Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout081412 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET AUGUST 14, 2012 – 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. – The City Council will convene in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: 1) Conference with Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation. The City Council will meet in closed session with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to the following matter of pending litigation concerning the Liberty Quarry project to which the City is the Plaintiff/Petitioner: "City of Temecula v. County of Riverside, et. al., Granite Construction Co. et. al., real party in interest" Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC 1211312. 2) Public Employee performance evaluation for the incumbent position of City Manager pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: 12-07 Resolution: 12-60 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chuck Washington Prelude Music: To Be Announced Invocation: Pastor Bill Cate of Trinity Lutheran Church Flag Salute: Mayor Pro Tem Naggar ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Official Welcome to the dignitaries of the Island of Huahine, French Polynesia Introduction of City Interns and brief overview of program 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of July 24, 2012. 3 List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 2 4 City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2012 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2012. 5 Amendment to Fiscal Year 2011-12 Bio-Tox Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Agreement between City of Temecula and Bio-Tox Laboratories for DUI Drug and Alcohol Screening Services to increase the payment amount to $36,000; 5.2 Approve an additional expenditure of $6,000 for a total annual expenditure of $36,000 to Bio-Tox Laboratories for Fiscal Year 2011-12. 6 Roripaugh Ranch Project — Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding with the owners of several Planning Areas that provides a framework for the negotiation of a future Operating Memorandum concerning (1) separation of the planning and permitting process for Planning Areas, (2) completion of the Phase I Neighborhood Park and disposition of the Development Impact Fees for this Park, and (3) development of a priority list for use of Roripaugh Ranch Community Facilities District funds for the remaining public improvements RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, Roripaugh Investors III, LLC, Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC, Roripaugh Valley Neighborhood Park, LLC, HRA Roripaugh 1 LLC, HRA Roripaugh 2 LLC, and Sunwood Roripaugh Ranch LLC. 7 Fiscal Year 2012-13 Economic Development Operating Budget Agreement with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the Operating Agreement for Fiscal Year 2012-13 with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $135,000. 8 Agreement for funding the acquisition of open space property (APN 940-140-011) between Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority and the City of Temecula RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 3 RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING THE ACQUISITION OF OPEN SPACE PROPERTY BETWEEN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AND CITY OF TEMECULA" (APN 940-140-011) 8.2 Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to issue a warrant for the sum of $135,000 to be deposited in an escrow account, to complete the transaction. 9 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City -Maintained System within Tract Map No. 24188 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 24188) 10 Construction Contract for Environmental Mitigation for French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements, PW02-11 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Award the construction contract for Environmental Mitigation for French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements, PW02-11, to Natures Image, Inc. in the amount of $195,559; 10.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $19,555.90, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 10.3 Make a finding that Environmental Mitigation for French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements, PW02-11 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 11 Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements — Phase II, PW09-02 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the plans and specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements — Phase II, PW09-02. 4 12 Acceptance of Improvements and Notice of Completion for the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Energy Management and Retrofit, PW11-05 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Accept the construction of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Energy Management and Retrofit, PW11-05, as complete; 12.2 Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract amount; 12.3 Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 13 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 12-06 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 12-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(D) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 12-01 Resolution: No. CSD 12-07 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 14 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the action minutes of July 24, 2012. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, August 28, 2012, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 6 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY — no meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY — no meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY — no meeting 7 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 Review the recommendations and goals resulting from the Jefferson Avenue Study Area public visioning process and authorization to proceed with the preparation of a Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Review and approve the recommendations and goals from the Jefferson Avenue Study Area public visioning process and authorize staff to proceed with the preparation of a Specific Plan. 16 Special Needs Update (at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Naggar) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Receive and file. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, August 28, 2012, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NONCE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.orq — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694- 6444. 8 PRESENTATIONS I� City of Temecula On behalf of the citizens of Temecula, California, U.S.A., we would like to extend a warm welcome and wish a memorable visit to: Marcelin Lisan Mayor, Ret., of the Island of Huahine, French Polynesia Executive Member of the French Polynesia Assembly It is a great honor for this City to have the opportunity to meet you and to share in a cultural exchange that fosters relations from across the world as a bridge for foreign cooperation and humanity. The City of Temecula welcomes you and your contingency from the Island of Huahine of the French Polynesia and we wish you a very memorable vi sit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of August, 2012. Chuck Washington, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk IP I� 1 City of Temecula On behalf of the citizens of Temecula, California, U.S.A., we would like to extend a warm welcome and wish a memorable visit to: Nelson Tepa Secretary General Island of Huahine, French Polynesia It is a great honor for this City to have the opportunity to meet you and to share in a cultural exchange that fosters relations from across the world as a bridge for foreign cooperation and humanity. The City of Temecula welcomes you and your contingency from the Island of Huahine of the French Polynesia and we wish you a very memorable vi sit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of August, 2012. Chuck Washington, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk IP I� City of Temecula On behalf of the citizens of Temecula, California, U.S.A., we would like to extend a warm welcome and wish a memorable visit to: Francis Villierme Secretary General, Retired Executive Advisor to the Island of Huahine, French Polynesia It is a great honor for this City to have the opportunity to meet you and to share in a cultural exchange that fosters relations from across the world as a bridge for foreign cooperation and humanity. The City of Temecula welcomes you and your contingency from the Island of Huahine of the French Polynesia and we wish you a very memorable vi sit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of August, 2012. Chuck Washington, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk IP I I� City of Temecula On behalf of the citizens of Temecula, California, U.S.A., we would like to extend a warm welcome and wish a memorable visit to: Moehau Colombani President of 0 Huahine Te Ti'araa and Special Task to the Executive Member of French Polynesia Assembly, Marcelin Lisan It is a great honor for this City to have the opportunity to meet you and to share in a cultural exchange that fosters relations from across the world as a bridge for foreign cooperation and humanity. The City of Temecula welcomes you and your contingency from the Island of Huahine of the French Polynesia and we wish you a very memorable vi sit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of August, 2012. Chuck Washington, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk IP CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 1 Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET JULY 24, 2012 – 7:00 PM 5:30 P.M. – The City Council will convene in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: 1) Public Employee performance evaluation for the incumbent position of City Manager pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. 2) Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the acquisition of the City of the YMCA building located at 29119 Margarita Road, Temecula 92591 on a portion of Margarita Park. The parties to the negotiations for the acquisition of this building are: YMCA of Riverside City and County and the City of Temecula. Negotiators for the City of Temecula are: Bob Johnson, Aaron Adams, and Tamra Irwin. Under negotiation are the price and terms for the acquisition of the building. 3) Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property negotiations for completion of the acquisition of the real property commonly known as 27495 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, California and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 921-480-013 in connection with the Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road, Project Number PW00-26. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and Christine and Michael Smith dba Temecula Marine. The City's negotiators are Greg Butler and Amer Attar. Under negotiation are the price and terms. 4) Conference with legal counsel—Potential litigation. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) with respect to one matter of pending potential litigation and will discuss whether to initiate litigation against the County of Riverside relating to its certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Liberty Quarry Project. 5) Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding one parcel of real property owned by the City of Temecula consisting of approximately 30.2 acres (APN 909-370-002) located northwesterly of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway. The parties to the negotiations for an amendment to the terms of sale of this property are: Wild Rivers Temecula LLC and the City of Temecula. Negotiators for the City of Temecula are: Bob Johnson, Patrick Richardson, and Luke Watson. Under negotiation are the price and terms of the sale of the property to Wild Rivers Temecula LLC. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. 1 At 5:30 P.M., Mayor Washington called the City Council meeting to order and recessed to Closed Session to consider the matters described on the Closed Session agenda. The City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Chuck Washington Prelude Music: The Second Hand Brass Band Invocation: Elder Bob McLean of Sunrise Christian Fellowship Flag Salute: Council Member Edwards ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Certificates of Recognition to Miss Pre -Teen Temecula, Regan Von Richter; Miss Junior Teen Temecula, Lanae Bussey; and Miss Teen Temecula, Christina Bates Certificate of Achievement to Jacob Adams for attaining the rank of Eagle Scout Certificate of Achievement to Lisa Fu for being awarded the Mayor's Purchase Award in the Ralph Love Plein Air Festival PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals addressed the City Council Members: • Peg Moore • Jimmy Moore • Ed Dool • Dr. Teo Beam • Cathe Bjorklund • Mariann Byers • Walt Allen • Matthew Fagan • Paul Jacobs • Craig Puma • Dione Moser • Bryan Bolund • Kathleen Hamilton • Tiffany Robertson • Wayne Hall CITY COUNCIL REPORTS 2 CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of July 10, 2012. 3 List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Fiscal Year 2012-13 Marketing Agreement - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the Marketing Agreement with Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau for publication and distribution of the Temecula Valley Tourism Rack Brochure/Map in the amount of $40,000 for Fiscal Year 2012-13. 5 All -Way Stop Control — Old Kent Road and Fox Road/Vermont Road - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. 3 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF OLD KENT ROAD AND FOX ROADNERMONT ROAD 6 Parking Restriction — Peach Tree Street, Primrose Avenue, and Ritchart Court - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A TIME LIMITED PARKING RESTRICTION ON PEACH TREE STREET FROM PRIMROSE AVENUE TO 600 FEET SOUTH OF VINE STREET, PRIMROSE AVENUE FROM PEACH TREE STREET TO RITCHART COURT, AND RITCHART COURT, BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 9 A.M. AND 12 P.M., MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, EXCEPT HOLIDAYS, AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A" At 7:17 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Public Financing Authority. At 7:58 P.M., the City Council resumed with regular business. PUBLIC HEARING 15 Weed Abatement Lien Resolution for Fiscal Year 2011-12 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 4 By way of Power Point presentation, Building Official, Rich Johnston, presented the staff report as per agenda material. There being no public comments, the public hearing was closed. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 16 Old Town Local Review Board Appointments — Reappointed Committee Members Albert Blair and Craig Puma, and appointed Tiffany Robertson to serve full three- year terms through June 15, 2015 (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Appoint three applicants to serve full three-year terms on the Old Town Local Review Board through June 15, 2015. City Clerk, Susan Jones, presented the staff report as per agenda material. 17 Budget Appropriation and Business Plan for the Temecula Small Business Incubator and Resource Center (located at 43200 Business Park Drive) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve Estimated Incubator Revenues in the amount of $16,850; 17.2 Approve budget appropriation in the amount of $65,000 for Year 1 Operating Expenditures of the Incubator from Fund Balance Restricted for the Dutch Villages Settlement; 17.3 Authorize staff to move forward with development of incubator programs and facility capital improvements. By way of Power Point presentation, Economic Development Analyst, Cheryl Kitzerow, presented the staff report as per agenda material. The following individuals addressed the City Council with regard to this item: • Paul Jacobs • Tom Courbat 5 18 Ordinance Amending Section 10.28.010(D) of the Temecula Municipal Code regarding Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets Approved staff recommendation only with regards to Del Rey Road, Via Norte to Solana Way (4-0-1, with Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Comerchero; and electronic vote showed approval with Council Member Roberts absent. Approved staff recommendation only with regards to Winchester Road, Fuller Road to Dendy Parkway (4-0-1, with Mayor Washington absent) Council Member Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Comerchero; and voice vote showed approval with Mayor Washington absent. Approved staff recommendation with the noted abstentions (5-0-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and voice vote showed unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 12-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(D) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS City Attorney Thorson introduced and read by title only Ordinance No. 12-06. Greg Butler, Public Works Director/City Engineer, presented the staff report as per agenda material. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 19 City Council Travel/Conference Report - June 2012 20 Planning Department Monthly Report 21 Economic Development Monthly Report 22 Police Department Monthly Report 23 Public Works Department Monthly Report 6 CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Per advice of the City Attorney, at 8:45 P.M., Mayor Washington recessed to Closed Session to complete one of the matters described on the Closed Session agenda. With regard to the real property negotiations, City Attorney Thorson noted that no action will be taken without the agreements coming before the Council for approval with the exception of Item 3 which will depend whether there is an agreement to a potential settlement. As to the potential litigation matter, Item 4, City Attorney Thorson noted that the City Council voted 5-0 providing direction to the City Attorney to file a lawsuit against the County of Riverside and Granite Construction. ADJOURNMENT At 9:04 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 14, 2012, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] 7 Chuck Washington, Mayor Item No. 3 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager Mr- Atd r, CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Wilson, Chief Financial Officer DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Leah Thomas, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $11,350,800.48. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of August, 2012. Chuck Washington, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 12- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of August, 2012, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 07/12/2012 TOTAL CHECK RUN $ 3,059,651.79 07/19/2012 TOTAL CHECK RUN 3,761,331.58 07/26/2012 TOTAL CHECK RUN 4,061,860.09 07/19/2012 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 467,957.02 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08/14/2012 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 11,350,800.48 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 4,617,072.16 130 RECOVERY ACT JAG FUNDING 2,524.92 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 1,497.40 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 412,165.30 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 707,132.25 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 76,654.76 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,749.16 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 1,670.00 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 25,551.99 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 20,150.35 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 1,064,964.26 300 INSURANCE FUND 14,580.84 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 72,424.08 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 7,430.08 340 FACILITIES 59,576.51 375 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM 391.46 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 3,601,631.36 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 3,979.42 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 3,638.66 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 2,201.64 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 3,985.83 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 3,559.27 477 CFD- RORIPAUGH 3,516.06 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 2,186.79 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 1,724.17 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 3,467.24 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 472.20 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 2,522.06 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 1,198.30 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 962.46 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 5,605.46 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 581.33 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 1,820.63 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 97.68 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 3,244.85 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 3,259.93 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 1,224.74 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 840.62 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 23,142.12 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 109.87 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 10,796.41 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 7,731.86 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 5,736.21 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 26,403.26 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 288.05 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 532.74 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 25,756.43 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 2,176.85 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 54.69 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 538.06 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 42,197.82 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 122.87 $ 10,882,843.46 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 276,700.49 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 1,757.51 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 6,824.50 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 135,804.34 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 231.56 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 2,729.30 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 541.98 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,066.01 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,380.45 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 21,416.25 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3,996.74 340 FACILITIES 10,743.02 375 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM 2,230.13 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 93.15 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 62.46 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 74.21 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 13.57 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 150.41 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 27.24 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 38.64 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 255.38 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 2.54 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 11.62 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 7.85 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 170.40 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 36.33 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 21.02 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 18.38 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 42.38 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 3.70 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 157.88 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 84.58 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 229.02 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 387.56 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 9.29 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 10.25 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 217.85 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 70.21 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 3.19 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 10.25 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 321.19 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 4.19 467,957.02 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 11,350,800.48 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1961 07/12/2012 003626 TEMECULA GARDENS LP FY12/13 pledge fund payment 305,000.00 305,000.00 99901 07/05/2012 015051 FAST, LISA refund:Parent'n Me swim lessons 36.00 36.00 99902 07/05/2012 015052 GRAHAM, YVONNE refund:Summer day camp 0405.205 96.00 96.00 99903 07/05/2012 015053 OIKE-FISCHER, YASUKO refund:Summer day camp 0400.200 322.00 322.00 99904 07/05/2012 015054 RASHID, MUNEERA refund:Multisport Camp 1825.201 132.00 132.00 99905 07/05/2012 015055 RISLEY, TAWNI refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston 150.00 150.00 99906 07/05/2012 015056 WILLIAMS, SINCEE refund:Level 4/5 swim lessons 45.00 45.00 99907 07/05/2012 014978 YAM, HEI refund:Summer day camp 0405.202 202.00 202.00 153021 07/06/2012 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 5/16-6/15 gen usage:IT,PD,CM,council 768.82 768.82 153022 07/12/2012 001985 A E P (ASSOC OF ENVIRO Membership 12/13: West, Dale 150.00 150.00 PROF) 153023 07/12/2012 007186 AB MAILING SOLUTIONS mailing svcs: 12/13 Theater brochures 4,500.00 mailing svcs: 12/13 Theater brochure 153024 07/12/2012 015045 ACES FOUNDATION refund:4th of July Parade 4444.200 153025 07/12/2012 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL Jun training: PD K9s Rudy/Astin INC 153026 07/12/2012 010904 AFECO INC thermal image camera: Stn 84 153027 07/12/2012 014531 ALLEN EMBROIDERY SERVICE staff uniforms: children's museum 153028 07/12/2012 004422 AMERICAN BATTERY batteries: Stn 84 CORPORATION 1,350.00 5,850.00 25.00 25.00 283.34 283.34 8,727.75 8,727.75 693.91 693.91 86.32 86.32 153029 07/12/2012 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES DUI & drug screenings: Police 127.14 (AFN) DUI & drug screenings: Police 847.60 974.74 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 153030 07/12/2012 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS intro water skills: aquatics 153031 07/12/2012 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE Apr animal control services VALLEYS 153032 07/12/2012 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC Bottled wtr svcs: CM Bottled wtr svcs: VRMS Bottled wtr svcs: Skate Park Bottled wtr svcs: PBSP Bottled wtr svcs: CRC Bottled wtr svcs: Library Bottled wtr svcs: FId Op Ctr Bottled wtr svcs: MPSC Bottled wtr svcs: CHS aquatics Bottled wtr svcs: TES pool Bottled wtr svcs: Ch Museum Bottled wtr svcs: Theater Bottled wtr svcs: TCC Bottled wtr svcs: TV Museum 153033 07/12/2012 007065 B & H PHOTO VIDEO INC MICROPHONE SYSTEM: LIBRARY Amount Paid Check Total 10.00 10.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 38.91 -10.00 6.45 43.68 90.97 71.92 75.61 95.81 97.03 40.44 28.92 36.45 16.95 19.11 652.25 1,499.95 1,499.95 153034 07/12/2012 005709 BAMM PROMOTIONAL softball awards: sports pgrm 849.67 PRODUCTS staff uniforms: aquatics 475.63 1,325.30 153035 07/12/2012 010508 BEST BUY STORES, L.P. SCANNERS/DVD/PROJECTORS: 3,483.97 3,483.97 FACILITIES 153036 07/12/2012 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS promot items: Theater tote bags 2,012.77 promo items: skate park 1,478.00 3,490.77 153037 07/12/2012 012946 BIOCOM SAN DIEGO 12/13 mb: economic development 2,000.00 2,000.00 153038 07/12/2012 014329 BOOK WHOLESALERS, INC (7) books: library 115.31 (1) book: library 17.10 132.41 153039 07/12/2012 014299 BOOKS ON TAPE (1) BOOK ON TAPE: LIBRARY 25.86 (1) BOOK ON TAPE: LIBRARY 32.33 58.19 153040 07/12/2012 014498 BOWERS, CHRISTOPHER advance:JAG cf 7/23-27 Orlando CB 300.00 300.00 153041 07/12/2012 014916 BRANDING HIVE, THE branding svcs: TV Museum 650.00 650.00 Page:2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153042 07/12/2012 003138 CAL MAT PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 150.44 PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 460.47 PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 798.75 PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 664.19 2,073.85 153043 07/12/2012 005071 CALIF ASSN OF PARKS & REC 12/13 CAPRCBM mb: city 190.00 190.00 153044 07/12/2012 004248 CALIF DEPT OF DUI & drug screenings: Police 1,820.00 JUSTICE-ACCTING DUI & drug screenings: Police 70.00 DUI & drug screenings: Police 35.00 1,925.00 153045 07/12/2012 000398 CALIF MUNI TREASURERS 12/13 CMTA mb: City of Temecula 155.00 155.00 ASSN 153046 07/12/2012 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY May liability claims mgmnt:finance 462.55 462.55 INC 153047 07/12/2012 000137 CHEVRON AND TEXACO City vehicles fuel: Police 401.73 401.73 153048 07/12/2012 004931 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY easement rpt: rrsp desilting basin 500.00 500.00 153049 07/12/2012 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS alarm repair: Library 150.00 alarm repair: civic ctr 93.75 243.75 153050 07/12/2012 013286 CONNEXON TELECOM INC Jun Enterprise 911 Svc:IT 250.00 250.00 153051 07/12/2012 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL electrical supplies: parks 646.50 646.50 DIST. 153052 07/12/2012 010865 CONSTANT CONTACT INC 1 yr subsc email marketing:temeculagov 1,920.00 1,920.00 153053 07/12/2012 011868 CONVALIAN PRODUCTIONS performance:Turn the Page 7/19 1,500.00 1,500.00 153054 07/12/2012 010331 COOPER, JOSIAH reimb: day camp snacks 7/6/12 59.29 59.29 153055 07/12/2012 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE misc supplies:4th of July patrols 151.15 151.15 153056 07/12/2012 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC plumbing svcs: crc restroom 250.00 plumbing svcs: crc plumbing svcs: sam hicks park plumbing svcs: PBSP restroom plumbing repair: Stn 84 185.00 185.00 148.00 632.04 1,400.04 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 153057 07/12/2012 008810 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL & signal camera maint: PW Traffic DATA 153058 07/12/2012 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. May citation svcs: Police 153059 07/12/2012 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATES Jun legislative cnslt svc: CM 153060 07/12/2012 011027 DEL RIO ENTERPRISE INC. sidewalk/gate repairs: RRSP 153061 07/12/2012 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS Amount Paid Check Total 840.00 840.00 952.17 952.17 3,500.00 3,500.00 8,822.00 8,822.00 portable restroom svc: 6/29 378.98 portable restroom svc: Stn 84 7/4 portable restroom svc: Stn 84 7/4 light tower equip rental: st painting 153062 07/12/2012 004438 DICK BLICK COMPANY INC misc supplies: TV Museum 153063 07/12/2012 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING INC 25.00 76.16 618.00 1,098.14 231.71 231.71 Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD 1,606.13 Fuel for City vehicles: Info Tech 59.99 Fuel for City vehicles: B&S 405.90 Fuel for City vehicles: Police 91.80 Fuel for City vehicles: Code Enf/Pln 594.10 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Maint 1,485.25 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Traffic 391.12 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Idv/npdes 182.50 Fuel for City vehicles: PW cipildv/npde 404.42 Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD 70.02 5,291.23 153064 07/12/2012 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Jun meter:32131 So Loop Rd Ldsc 92.19 DIST Jun meter:32131 So Loop Rd DCDA 196.50 288.69 153065 07/12/2012 014419 ELLIOTT, MICHAEL G. Jun inspection svcs: parks 1,000.00 1,000.00 153066 07/12/2012 011203 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING Jun janitorial svc: PD OT office 571.86 Jun janitorial svcs: tcsd parks 5,265.00 5,836.86 153067 07/12/2012 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE May cnslt svc: EIR Bella Lindaor 79,089.26 79,089.26 ASSOC. Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 153070 07/12/2012 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE Description landscape maint: deportola rd landscape maint: duck pond irrigation sys improve: duck pond landscape maint: meadows park landscape maint: temeku park landscape maint: temeku park equip repair/maint: duck pond plant installation: library irrigation repairs: vail ranch slope replace trees: sunset park replace plants: paseo del sol medians replace shrubs: civic center landscape maint: margarita rd Jun landscape maint: south slopes Jun landscape maint: north slopes Jun landscape maint: parks Jun landscape maint: parks Jun landscape maint: parks backflow enclosures:wolf crk park sod installation: harveston lake park irrigation repairs: mirada slope backflow repair: temeku hills slope irrigation repairs: harveston slope irrigation repairs: Stn 84 irrigation repairs: harveston slope irrigation repairs: harveston slope landscape maint: veterans park landscape maint: veterans park landscape maint: vail ranch irrigation repairs: vail ranch slope irigation repairs: martinique slope Jun landscape maint:city facilities plant installation: CRC plant installation: CRC PLANT INSTALLATION: CRC PLANT INSTALLATION: CRC plant installation: vail ranch slope PLANT INSTALLATION: VAIL RANCH plant installation: rancho ca medians plant installation: marg n medians landscape improvements:duck pond landscape imprv:tradewinds slopes plant installation:paloma del sol park replace irrigation control: rch solana plant installation:temeku hills slope plant installation:crowne hill park irrigation repairs: vail ranch slope Amount Paid Check Total 223.22 305.10 2,343.00 2,159.00 477.74 205.89 4,918.00 2,751.00 3,850.00 1,050.00 1,288.00 450.00 700.00 34,844.87 19,749.97 50,935.88 16,469.70 47,825.10 13,348.00 12,500.00 221.72 156.93 339.92 323.53 166.46 166.46 166.46 166.46 201.11 191.89 197.19 9,443.13 680.00 300.00 1,400.00 5,300.00 6,129.00 736.00 3,330.00 208.00 2,125.00 22,300.00 765.00 476.25 1,500.00 675.00 511.93 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 153071 07/12/2012 012170 E -Z UP DIRECT.COM, LLC 153072 07/12/2012 014752 FAITH COM, INC. 153073 07/12/2012 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 153074 07/12/2012 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER Description tree planting: vail ranch slope irrigation repairs: vineyard slope plant installation: civic ctr plant installation: rancho ca medians plant installation: old town plant installation:temeku hills slope irrigation repairs: villages slope irrigation upgrade:martinique slope E -Z Ups: civic center replace light fixtures:city hall/maint replace light fixtures:city hall/maint 5/9-31 city express mail services Amount Paid Check Total 390.00 107.64 768.00 192.00 192.00 1,820.00 102.20 1,125.00 279,268.75 1,984.11 1,984.11 6,507.95 19,809.40 26,317.35 458.71 458.71 013338 APPLE STORE GY iPad serial # dmphn8ggdnqr 799.21 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES JC regist:NLC cf Boston 11/27-12/1 460.00 006937 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES GY refund airfare: Woods, Andrew -1,061.20 006937 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES GY airfare: Scanlon, Terry 1,061.20 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING GW recruitment ad: HR 200.00 ASSOCIATION 006952 PAYPAL GW Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction 59.95 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GW gfoa web training: Cardenas, R 170.00 OFFICERS 011368 MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, GW web subscr: enr.com RG 9.95 THE 015041 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION GW cpe ethics books/exams: GW/RG 149.50 1,848.61 SVCS LP 153075 07/12/2012 004074 FRANCHISE MGMT SERVICES event supplies: high hopes July 4th 247.03 247.03 INC 153076 07/12/2012 014983 FU, LIJUAN (LISA) Plein Air Mayor's Award 500.00 500.00 153077 07/12/2012 007866 G C S SUPPLIES INC toner/ink cartridges: info tech 1,713.51 1,713.51 153078 07/12/2012 010326 G E MOBILE WATER, INC Jun power washer exchange:Stn 73 63.58 63.58 153079 07/12/2012 001937 GALLS INC uniform boots: police 316.52 316.52 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 153080 07/12/2012 014234 GEARS 2 ROBOTS, LLC (Continued) 153081 07/12/2012 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS INC 153082 07/12/2012 014405 GORM INCORPORATED 153083 07/12/2012 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS 153084 07/12/2012 013049 GUIDANT CORP 153085 07/12/2012 005311 H2O CERTIFIED POOL WATER SPCL. 153086 07/12/2012 010210 HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC, THE 153087 07/12/2012 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE 153088 07/12/2012 002701 HUB INT'L INSURANCE SERVCS INC 153089 07/12/2012 004406 IGOE & COMPANY INC 153090 07/12/2012 013695 INLAND EMPIRE SHRED IT 153091 07/12/2012 011228 INLAND PLANNING AND DESIGN INC Description refund:rental fees:Conf Ctr Office Supplies: B&S Office Supplies: PW Office supplies: HR Office Supplies: Pln/Code Enf Office supplies: Info Tech misc janitorial svcs: parks misc cleaning supplies: library misc cleaning supplies: city facilities 9/12-8/13 GFOA mb: Bilby, David refund:grading dep PM 23354 refund:grading dep PM 23354 Jun fountain maint:town square Jun pool maint: citywide pool clean up svcs: aquatics crc Jun fountain maint: civic center misc tools/equip: civic ctr misc tools/equip: civic ctr misc tools/equip: library Jun '12 special events premiums May flex benefit plan pmt 6/25 doc shred svcs: PD mall office MAY CNSLT SVCS: JEFFERSON CORRIDOR 153092 07/12/2012 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY pool sanitizing chemicals: aquatics INC 153093 07/12/2012 012295 JAMESON MANAGEMENT INC door repair: Stn 92 door repair: Stn 92 door repair: Stn 84 door maint: Stn 84 Amount Paid Check Total 100.00 59.39 713.05 165.94 355.58 615.28 1,465.40 993.02 3,231.26 150.00 995.00 995.00 175.00 900.00 255.00 500.00 1,605.70 117.07 416.42 2,071.91 200.00 15.00 4,100.00 698.87 427.49 735.35 471.72 289.43 100.00 1,909.24 5,689.68 150.00 1,990.00 1,830.00 1,722.77 416.42 2,071.91 200.00 15.00 4,100.00 698.87 1,923.99 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153094 07/12/2012 013200 JAROTH INC July pay phones:duck pond,Library,CRC 212.64 212.64 153095 07/12/2012 012285 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY misc tools: civic ctr 153.54 misc tools: civic ctr 172.28 325.82 153096 07/12/2012 013490 KANEKO, KOZO program fees:Daisen 4/5-4/16 RR 3,150.00 3,150.00 153097 07/12/2012 015044 KRIEL, TRACY refund:bal. on acct:Basketball skills 30.00 30.00 153098 07/12/2012 000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC maint supplies: Stn 84 109.97 maint supplies: Civc Ctr/PW 1,842.14 1,952.11 153099 07/12/2012 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. TCSD instructor earnings 346.50 TCSD instructor earnings 245.00 591.50 153100 07/12/2012 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC medical supplies: paramedics 752.27 medical supplies: paramedics 45.35 medical supplies: paramedics 437.90 1,235.52 153101 07/12/2012 013769 LIGHTSQUARED LP Jun satellite phone svc: CM/Fire 149.04 149.04 153102 07/12/2012 008965 LOWDER, BOB entertainment:hot summer ngts 7/13 550.00 550.00 153103 07/12/2012 015018 MAASBERG, LAURA CITLALI TCSD Instructor Earnings 115.50 115.50 153104 07/12/2012 008716 MAGEE, BILL Entertainment:Hot Summer Nights 7/13 650.00 650.00 153105 07/12/2012 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS MISC SIGNS: PW MAI NT 51.72 51.72 153106 07/12/2012 004141 MAINTEXINC Custodial supplies:var. parks 1,522.29 1,522.29 153107 07/12/2012 004307 MARINE BIOCHEMISTS Jun water maint srvcs:Hary/Duck Pond 3,900.00 3,900.00 153108 07/12/2012 014767 MARKETING POWER, INC. lighting retrofit srvcs:fire stn 73 3,725.72 lighting retrofit srvcs:mpsc 4,692.38 lighting retrofit srvcs:history museum 2,101.18 lighting retrofit srvcs:fire stn 84 4,606.18 lighting retrofit srvcs:var facilities 6,280.54 21,406.00 153109 07/12/2012 014918 MARTINEZ, CHELSEA refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston 422.00 422.00 153110 07/12/2012 013274 MCCAIN, KEITH Refund:grading dep PM 22515 1,056.00 1,056.00 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153111 07/12/2012 015048 MCGONEGAL, TIMOTHY refund:sec dep:rm rental:Conf Ctr 150.00 150.00 153112 07/12/2012 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS INC. Reimbursement:marketing expenses 500.60 500.60 153113 07/12/2012 013965 MONOPRICE, INC. MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:INFO 350.28 350.28 TECH 153114 07/12/2012 006745 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE Veh repair & maint:pw patch truck 372.52 372.52 153115 07/12/2012 001986 MUZAK LLC Jul dish network programing:foc 123.18 123.18 153116 07/12/2012 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS Auto parts & misc supplies:stn 84 87.09 Auto parts & misc supplies:stn 84 196.74 Misc parts & supplies:pw maint 924.19 1,208.02 153117 07/12/2012 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Jun legal advertising:City Clerk/PIn 807.84 Jun advertising:Street Painting 450.00 1,257.84 153118 07/12/2012 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS office supplies:history museum 72.80 DIV office supplies:history museum 664.40 737.20 153119 07/12/2012 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs:Police CAP 29.54 29.54 153120 07/12/2012 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY recreation supplies:crc 210.04 INC recreation supplies:crc 123.25 333.29 153121 07/12/2012 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 197.88 Petty Cash Reimbursement 359.76 557.64 153122 07/12/2012 015050 PHILLIPS III, ANALEEN C. OR refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston 200.00 200.00 153123 07/12/2012 002354 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS INC Promo items:fire safety prevention 3,823.77 3,823.77 153124 07/12/2012 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE 7/17/12-7/15/13 subscr:PW 16178628 187.20 187.20 COMPANY INC 153125 07/12/2012 013725 PROCRAFT INC facility maint:civic center 95.00 95.00 153126 07/12/2012 014873 PROTECH THEATRICAL Safety inspection & repair:theater 2,500.00 2,500.00 SRVCS, INC. 153127 07/12/2012 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS Reprographic services:FV Pkwy, ph I 429.92 429.92 Page:9 apChkLst 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 153128 07/12/2012 000271 RBF CONSULTING 153129 07/12/2012 015043 REALITY RALLY, ATTN: CORINNA CORAM 153130 07/12/2012 004498 REPUBLIC INTELLIGENT (Continued) Description May eng consultant:diaz/dendy refund:sec dep:rm rental:Conf Ctr TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT:FRONT & 1ST/SANTIAG 153131 07/12/2012 008928 RIGEL PRODUCTS & SERVICE Equip repair & maint:pw maint 153132 07/12/2012 015047 RIVERA, MANUEL 153133 07/12/2012 000352 RIVERSIDE CO ASSESSOR 153134 07/12/2012 010777 RIVERSIDE CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE 153135 07/12/2012 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 153136 07/12/2012 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 153137 07/12/2012 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 153138 07/12/2012 008739 ROSE CITY LABEL 153139 07/12/2012 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC 153140 07/12/2012 005329 SAFE ALTERNATIVE FOR EVERYONE 153141 07/12/2012 005755 SCANLON, TERRY 153142 07/12/2012 006554 SHAFFER, FRED 153143 07/12/2012 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC refund:sec dep:rm rental:TCC May assessor map copies:Bldg & Safety JUN ANIMAL SHELTER PMT 4/5/12-5/2/12 law enforcement Explorer Acad. 7/15-20 ar/nt/et/mf/dd Adv Search Warrant Prep 8/14-16 B.P. Fire Prevention promo items Misc supplies:crc Misc supplies:crc fy 11/12 comm srvc funding:S.A.F.E. pgrm Advance, Nat'l School Safety Cf 7/23-27 Entertainment:Hot Summer Nights 7/13 Jazz @ the Merc 6/28/12 153144 07/12/2012 004460 SILVERADO BLUEGRASS BAND Entertainment:Hot Summer Nights 7/13 Amount Paid Check Total 5,715.00 100.00 2,374.08 296.95 400.00 9.00 10,549.40 1,509,699.40 1,175.00 155.00 446.32 93.73 205.01 10,000.00 450.00 500.00 569.00 750.00 5,715.00 100.00 2,374.08 296.95 400.00 9.00 10,549.40 1,509,699.40 1,175.00 155.00 446.32 298.74 10,000.00 450.00 500.00 569.00 750.00 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 153145 07/12/2012 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 153146 07/12/2012 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Description Misc supplies:var special events Recreation supplies:cultural events Recreation supplies:cultural events Misc supplies:aquatics pgrm MISC SUPPLIES:HIGH HOPES PGR misc supplies:summer day camp Recreation supplies:summer day camp Misc supplies:F.I.T pgrm Misc supplies:crc Jun 2-20-798-3248:42081 Main St Jun 2-05-791-8807:31587 Tem pkwy L Jun 2-10-331-2153:28816 Pujol St Jun 2-29-479-2981:31454 Tem pkwy T July 2-01-202-7330:var LS -1 Allnite July 2-33-777-1950:40135 Village Rd Jun 2-01-202-7603:Arterial STLT Jun 2-29-974-7899:26953 Ynez rd LS3 Jun 2-31-031-2590:28301 Rancho Cal Jun 2-29-657-2563:42902 Butterfield Jun 2-31-936-3511:46488 Pechanga pl Jun 2-27-805-3194:42051 Main St Jun 2-30-066-2889:30051 Rancho vistE Jun 2-25-350-5119:45602 Redhawk Jun 2-02-351-5281:CRC Jun 2-30-608-9384:28582 Harveston 153147 07/12/2012 014783 SOFTRESOURCES, LLC Jun consultant srvcs:new permit sys May consultant srvcs:new permit sys 153148 07/12/2012 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST pest control srvcs:pbsp CONTROL INC Pest control services: sp08 pbsp, plac€ Pest control services: sp08 pbsp, plac€ Jun pest control srvcs:City fac's 153149 07/12/2012 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA July gen usage:0141,0839,2593,9306 153150 07/12/2012 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC refreshments:summer day camp 6/28 153151 07/12/2012 012789 STUART, JENNIFER SARAH TCSD Instructor Earnings 153152 07/12/2012 015042 SULLIVAN SOLAR POWER refund:permit fee overpmt:B12-1118 153153 07/12/2012 009811 SUNNY HILLS TOWING vehicle towing services:Tem. Police LOWBED SRVC Amount Paid Check Total 2,001.87 89.70 59.45 191.30 93.12 16.33 579.25 436.14 300.14 3,767.30 1,714.06 9,522.70 1,374.77 96.66 76, 503.68 594.23 27, 876.10 172.50 38.56 194.84 25.05 5,978.51 22.59 24.05 8,144.14 805.88 133,088.32 9,775.00 16,775.00 26,550.00 70.00 94.00 136.00 748.00 1,048.00 479.33 479.33 257.41 257.41 7,115.50 7,115.50 20.00 20.00 337.50 337.50 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 153154 07/12/2012 015046 SZYCHULDA, STEVEN T. refund:eng grad dep:LD11-036GR 153155 07/12/2012 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL 2/25-4/30 consulting srvcs:fv pkwy/115 2/25-4/30 consulting srvcs:wnchstr/I15 153156 07/12/2012 012265 TEMECULA ACE HARDWARE misc hardware supplies:var. parks C/O 153157 07/12/2012 010679 TEMECULA AUTO Vehicle maint & repair: stn 84 REPAIR/RADIATOR 153158 07/12/2012 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS L LC MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM. P. D. MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM. MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM. 153159 07/12/2012 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER State of the City 4/26 DB/PB/MB/BG/JD OF 153160 07/12/2012 007340 TEMECULA VALLEY FIRE Fire Extinguisher Maint Svc:Stn 73 153161 07/12/2012 008518 TEMECULA VALLEY FOUNDATION Amount Paid Check Total 3,000.00 3,000.00 202,299.92 128,090.33 12.05 330,390.25 12.05 327.96 327.96 186.46 706.42 692.49 1,585.37 200.00 200.00 25.00 25.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 6,321.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 9,933.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 1,400.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 7,704.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 4,060.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 2,465.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 9,632.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 870.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 4,495.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 4,350.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 2,635.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 1,240.00 TVFEE Instructor Earnings 5,270.00 60,375.00 153162 07/12/2012 005970 TEMECULA VALLEY PLAYERS "Oliver" June '12 performance 7,632.92 7,632.92 153163 07/12/2012 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith srvcs:civic center 78.98 78.98 CENTR 153164 07/12/2012 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE July high speed internet:42081 Main St 58.49 July high speed internet:40135 Village 235.47 293.96 153165 07/12/2012 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC Sound & tech srvcs:4th of July 19,500.00 19,500.00 153166 07/12/2012 015049 TINOCO, EVELYN refund:sec dep:rm rental:TCC 400.00 400.00 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153167 07/12/2012 011611 TRAN, QUANG HONG Refund:permit/30975 via norte 995.00 995.00 153168 07/12/2012 004124 TRUELINE tennis ct surfacing:gardner mid school 26,890.00 26,890.00 153169 07/12/2012 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE Jun undrgrnd svcs alert tickets:PW 205.50 205.50 ALERT 153170 07/12/2012 012549 UPODIUM Auto maint supplies: stn 84 83.09 Auto maint supplies:stn 84 29.09 Auto maint supplies:stn 84 98.21 210.39 153171 07/12/2012 008977 VALLEY EVENTS INC Rental equip:4th of July event 749.75 749.75 153172 07/12/2012 014848 VALUTEC CARD SOLUTIONS, Ticketing Services: theater 1,082.18 1,082.18 LLC 153173 07/12/2012 004789 VERIZON July Internet svcs:SW DSL:PD:Jones,C. 39.95 39.95 153174 07/12/2012 004848 VERIZON SELECT SERVICES Jun long distance phone svcs 12.74 INC Jun long distance phone svcs 7.30 20.04 153175 07/12/2012 015057 VETERANS SUPPLEMENTAL FY12/13 Council Community Srvc 1,000.00 1,000.00 SUPPORT Funding 153176 07/12/2012 012292 VIAMEDIA INC Jun adveritising: Street Painting 2012 2,167.00 2,167.00 153177 07/12/2012 013647 VICAR OPERATING, INC. VETERINARY SRVCS:POLICE K-9 UNIT 305.58 305.58 153178 07/12/2012 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC custodial supplies:Cityfac's 2,630.40 2,630.40 153179 07/12/2012 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 5/16-31 tree trimming/removal:var.slopes 674.00 6/1-15 tree trimming:rrsp 196.00 5/16-31 tree trimming:campos verde sl 5,110.00 5/16-31 tree trimming:citywide 13,469.00 5/16-30 tree trimming:citywide 1,428.00 6/1-15 tree trimming:var. slopes 3,913.00 24,790.00 153180 07/12/2012 010637 WESTERN CENTER Excursion: history museum 7/12 84.00 84.00 COMMUNITY 153181 07/12/2012 014781 WILLIAMS ARCHITECTS, INC. Jun design srvcs TCC 5,200.00 5,200.00 153182 07/12/2012 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL Reimb:supplies for 4th of July event 73.90 73.90 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14 07/12/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 153183 07/12/2012 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Equipment maintenance: Medics Amount Paid Check Total 1,548.53 1,548.53 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 3,059,651.79 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15 07112/2012 1:11:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA 169 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 3,059,651.79 Page:15 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1962 07/19/2012 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Ins Payment 25,278.41 25,278.41 1963 07/19/2012 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 89,406.64 89,406.64 1964 07/19/2012 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- Project Retirement Payment 6,436.74 6,436.74 SOLUTION 1965 07/19/2012 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Nationwide Retirement Payment 11,841.28 11,841.28 SOLUTION 1966 07/19/2012 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payment 147,000.17 147,000.17 RETIREMENT) 1967 07/19/2012 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD Support Payment 1,176.34 1,176.34 SUPPORT 1968 07/11/2012 015065 RIVERSIDE CO OFFICE OF THE Jan -Jun' 12 tax increment revenue 377,154.99 377,154.99 1969 07/12/2012 015064 GRANITE ESCROW SERVICES land acquisition:apn 940-300-026 130,000.00 130,000.00 153184 07/19/2012 000733 ABBEY PARTY RENTS linen rental: budget wkshp 97.50 97.50 153185 07/19/2012 010851 ADAMIAK, DAWN reimb: generator Mayor's event 6/9 119.71 119.71 153186 07/19/2012 008552 ADKINS DESIGN CONSULTING Jun graphic design svcs: Theater 2,000.11 credit: billing adj inv exceeds contract -997.61 1,002.50 153187 07/19/2012 014695 ALL AMERICAN equip repair/maint:police bicycles 1,961.05 1,961.05 MOTORSPORTS, INC 153188 07/19/2012 006915 ALLIES PARTY EQUIPMENT equip rental: Westem Days 5/19-20 1,017.39 equip rental: aglow in the park 6/29 1,218.01 2,235.40 153189 07/19/2012 012943 ALPHA MECHANICAL SERVICE plumbing svcs: parking garage 510.19 510.19 INC 153190 07/19/2012 015079 ANGUIANO, FRIDA refund: security dep CRC 7/7 400.00 400.00 153191 07/19/2012 008314 AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP Jun design svcs: crc waterslide 500.00 May design svcs: crc waterslide 1,000.00 1,500.00 153192 07/19/2012 011961 AT&T MOBILITY June Trip wire:Graf itti:Police 130.20 130.20 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153193 07/19/2012 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS TCSD instructor earnings 153194 07/19/2012 010962 BILBY, DAVID reimb: GFOAJCPFO pgrm costs 153195 07/19/2012 005665 BLACK'S TOWING towing svcs: Police 153196 07/19/2012 012583 BLANCA Y PRICE 4/23-5/29/12 consulting srvcs:Pln 153197 07/19/2012 008605 BONTERRA CONSULTING May cnslt svcs: M Crk Brdg/Overland credit:billing adj reimb expenses 153198 07/19/2012 014329 BOOK WHOLESALERS, INC (4) books: library 153199 07/19/2012 014229 BOXFORLESS.COM boxes boat regatta: FAM 8/17 153200 07/19/2012 003048 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB 11 Halloween carnvial booth fee 153201 07/19/2012 003878 BRANDT, LAUREN 01/02 CFD 88-12 reimbursement 153202 07/19/2012 006908 C C & COMPANY INC entertainment: 4th of July event 153203 07/19/2012 004462 C D W GOVERNMENT INC (7) iPad doc adapt/display:Info Tech 153204 07/19/2012 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials PW patch truck materials PW patch truck materials PW patch truck materials PW patch truck materials 153205 07/19/2012 013265 CALIF BUILDING 153206 07/19/2012 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVATION 153207 07/19/2012 000647 CALIF DEPT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 882.00 882.00 215.09 215.09 1,805.00 1,805.00 3,710.00 3,710.00 27,295.12 -25.04 27,270.08 42.00 42.00 760.99 760.99 150.00 150.00 185.46 185.46 1,200.00 1,200.00 471.34 471.34 299.87 160.55 307.51 279.32 169.20 2nd Qtr Pymt SB1473 2012 -165.00 2ND QTR PYMT SB1473 2012 2012 2nd qtr pymt: strong motion 2012 2nd qtr pymt: strong motion cpa license renewal:Graciano, Rudy 153208 07/19/2012 004248 CALIF DEPT OF May fingerprinting svcs: PD/HR JUSTICE-ACCTING 153209 07/19/2012 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY Helium tanks rental/refihl:TCSD 1,216.45 1,653.00 1,488.00 4,768.96 -238.45 4,530.51 120.00 120.00 4,503.00 4,503.00 56.50 56.50 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153210 07/19/2012 014609 CAMPBELL, KENTON SCOTT refund: dupl pymt online bl# 022235 35.00 35.00 153211 07/19/2012 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY Jun liability claims mgmnt: SBO 438.63 438.63 INC 153212 07/19/2012 014726 CHAPTER 13 STANDING SUPPORT PMT 182.77 182.77 TRUSTEE 153213 07/19/2012 000137 CHEVRON AND TEXACO City vehicles fuel: Police 1,855.67 1,855.67 153214 07/19/2012 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH Community Health Charities Payment 51.00 51.00 CHARITIES 153215 07/19/2012 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL misc electrical supplies: Civic Ctr 86.20 DIST. misc electrical supplies: pkg garage 105.60 191.80 153216 07/19/2012 012353 CONSTRUCTION TESTING May soil insp/testing: crc rehab 630.00 630.00 153217 07/19/2012 013379 COUSSOU, CELINE 153218 07/19/2012 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC 153219 07/19/2012 013560 CROWN BUILDING MAINT CO INC TCSD Instructor Eamings 616.00 TCSD Instructor Eamings 504.00 plumbing svcs: MPSC 768.01 plumbing svcs: city hall 5,800.00 plumbing svcs: MPSC 405.27 Jun janitorial svcs: Harveston Park 131.84 1,120.00 6,973.28 Jun janitorial svcs: Fld Op Ctr 763.80 Jun janitorial svcs: Harveston Ctr 233.96 Jun janitorial svcs: city facilities 4,077.02 5,206.62 153220 07/19/2012 012734 CROWN CASTLE USA INC refund: traffic control pin ck svcs 27,657.69 27,657.69 153221 07/19/2012 014580 DANCE THEATRE COLLECTIVE Theater procurement agreement 12/13 7,200.00 7,200.00 153222 07/19/2012 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. Jun citation svcs: Police 1,381.86 1,381.86 153223 07/19/2012 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL restroom svc: 4th July RRSP 3,980.31 SRVCS restroom svc: 4th July Parade 343.14 4,323.45 153224 07/19/2012 004438 DICK BLICK COMPANY INC exhibit supplies: TV Museum 724.05 724.05 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 153225 07/19/2012 004068 ECALDRE MANALILI-DE VILLA, AILEEN 153226 07/19/2012 011202 EMH SPORTS & FITNESS INSTITUTE 153227 07/19/2012 003665 EXCEL COMMERCIAL 153228 07/19/2012 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE Amount Paid Check Total TCSD Instructor Eamings 551.25 TCSD Instructor Eamings 491.75 TCSD Instructor Eamings 252.00 TCSD Instructor Eamings 98.00 TCSD Instructor Eamings 283.50 TCSD Instructor Eamings 297.50 TCSD Instructor Eamings 140.00 TCSD Instructor Eamings 392.00 2,506.00 TCSD instructor earnings 577.50 577.50 Jun long distance phone svcs 54.57 54.57 replace backflow cages:wlf creek 27,005.91 27,005.91 153229 07/19/2012 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 006942 ONTARIO AIRPORT RR parking:APTA Rail cf 6/2-6 Dallas 90.00 001060 HYATT RR htl:APTA Rail cf 6/2-6 Dallas 723.91 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES RR regist:NLC cf Boston 11/27-12/1 460.00 1,273.91 153230 07/19/2012 011145 FOSTER, JILL C. TCSD instructor earnings 966.00 TCSD instructor earnings 714.00 TCSD instructor earnings 441.00 2,121.00 153231 07/19/2012 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 50.00 50.00 153232 07/19/2012 007279 GAIL MATERIALS INC infield mix: PBSP 3,089.73 3,089.73 153233 07/19/2012 001937 GALLS INC uniform svcs: PD Volunteers 28.20 28.20 153234 07/19/2012 013552 GANDS PRODUCTIONS LLC sttlmnt: Country at the Merc 7/7 819.00 819.00 153235 07/19/2012 014773 GARDENA, CITY OF regist:Adv Ofc Tr Gonzalez, Salvador 270.00 270.00 153236 07/19/2012 010452 GAYLORD BROS INC helmet/hat stand: TV Museum 58.01 58.01 153237 07/19/2012 014234 GEARS 2 ROBOTS, LLC TCSD instructor earnings 1,750.00 1,750.00 153238 07/19/2012 008805 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES equip maint: npdes wtr smpl meter 3,577.80 3,577.80 INC Page4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 153239 07/19/2012 000177 GLENN IES OFFICE PRODUCTS INC 153240 07/19/2012 014402 GROEPPER, BROOKE ELIZABETH 153241 07/19/2012 015080 HANCOCK, LORENA 153242 07/19/2012 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 153243 07/19/2012 001135 HEALTH POINTE MEDICAL GROUP INC 153244 07/19/2012 012204 HERITAGE FAMILY MINISTRIES 153245 07/19/2012 015078 HUGHES, NANCY 153246 07/19/2012 000194 IC MA RETIREMENT -PLAN 303355 153247 07/19/2012 000863 IP MA 153248 07/19/2012 014062 ID CARD GROUP 153249 07/19/2012 004406 IGOE & COMPANY INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Office Supplies: CRC Office Supplies: tcsd aquatics/parks Office Supplies: Library Office Supplies: Fire Dept Office Supplies: MPSC Office Supplies: TV Museum TCSD instructor earnings History Museum presentation 7/26 Hardware supplies: TV Museum Hardware supplies: tcsd parks Hardware supplies: civic ctr/parks Hardware supplies: Library Hardware supplies: Ch Museum Hardware supplies: Old Town Hardware supplies: TCC Hardware supplies: CRC Hardware supplies: Aquatics Hardware supplies: Fire Dept Hardware supplies: Info Tech Hardware supplies: PW Traffic Hardware supplies: PW Maint Hardware supplies: Harveston Hardware supplies: B&S emp industrial care svcs: HR TCSD Instructor Eamings TCSD Instructor Eamings refund: 4th July Fun Zone ICMA Retirement Trust 457 Payment recruitment ad: HR ID BADGE PRINTER: INFO TECH Jun flex benefit plan pmt Jul flex benefit plan pmt 564.11 353.58 1,056.19 1,759.19 25.39 478.61 364.00 75.00 99.39 519.66 268.71 32.71 21.24 18.08 48.44 650.38 257.17 1,003.11 35.00 308.19 2,058.32 6.42 24.01 393.00 3,675.00 2,384.38 25.00 6,544.51 175.00 3,823.42 200.00 4,237.07 364.00 75.00 5,350.83 393.00 6,059.38 25.00 6,544.51 175.00 3,823.42 200.00 400.00 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153250 07/19/2012 009693 INLAND VALLEY CLASSICAL sttlmnt: Swan Lake July' 12 1,296.62 1,296.62 BALLET 153251 07/19/2012 003266 IRON MOUNTAIN OFFSITE Jun offsite storage: records mgmnt 476.16 476.16 153252 07/19/2012 003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO broadcasting: street painting fest 1,006.00 1,006.00 153253 07/19/2012 004546 KING, JAMES N. entertainment:hot summer nts 7/20 1,250.00 1,250.00 153254 07/19/2012 015066 LAWLOR, JODY Refund:eng deposit/LD02-143GR 995.00 995.00 153255 07/19/2012 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. TCSD instructor earnings 955.50 955.50 153256 07/19/2012 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC medical supplies: Paramedics 2,395.54 2,395.54 153257 07/19/2012 012709 MARGARITA MEDICAL CONDO Refund:eng deposit/LD01-033GR 995.00 995.00 DEV 153258 07/19/2012 014536 MARKEN, KERI E. Jun cataloging srvcs:History Museum 1,780.00 1,780.00 153259 07/19/2012 014431 MARTLAND, BETTE B History Museum presentation 7/25 75.00 75.00 153260 07/19/2012 011179 MC MILLIN REDHAWK LLC TCSD Instructor Eamings 630.00 630.00 153261 07/19/2012 015077 MEDINA, LUIS Refund:securitydeposit/tcc 7/3 250.00 Refund:security deposit/tcc 4/4 150.00 400.00 153262 07/19/2012 012264 MIRANDA, JULIO C. TCSD Instructor Eamings TCSD Instructor Eamings TCSD Instructor Eamings 153263 07/19/2012 004586 MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC install swing gate:children's museum 153264 07/19/2012 001214 MORNINGSTAR audio/visual srvcs:every 15 min prgm PRODUCTIONS, LLC 153265 07/19/2012 010908 MR APPLIANCE OF Appliance repair/maint:pbsp WINCHESTER Appliance repair & maint:pbsp 1,008.00 840.00 420.00 2,268.00 1,655.00 1,655.00 4,755.43 4,755.43 284.25 524.00 808.25 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 153266 07/19/2012 013375 MYERS-RUSSO, ERICA Description Amount Paid Check Total TCSD Instructor Eamings TCSD Instructor Eamings TCSD Instructor Eamings TCSD Instructor Eamings 153267 07/19/2012 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Jun newspapersubscr:MPSC 96.00 128.00 96.00 128.00 448.00 26.00 26.00 153268 07/19/2012 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS Misc office supplies:Finance 417.69 DIV Misc office supplies:Finance 49.93 467.62 153269 07/19/2012 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD 350.19 350.19 153270 07/19/2012 014092 P & P HARDWARE Uniforms:TCC prgm 480.89 480.89 153271 07/19/2012 014313 PENA, GINGER C. Plein Air First Place Award 200.00 200.00 153272 07/19/2012 013381 PEREZ, AARON TROY TCSD Instructor Eamings 472.50 TCSD Instructor Eamings 441.00 913.50 153273 07/19/2012 013115 PETERSON NUGENT, KRISTIN TCSD Instructor Eamings 1,333.50 1,333.50 153274 07/19/2012 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 222.57 Petty Cash Reimbursement 495.17 717.74 153275 07/19/2012 015076 PICENO, GABBY Refund:security deposit/harveston center 200.00 200.00 153276 07/19/2012 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL pool supplies & chemicals: citywide 408.68 408.68 PRODUCTS INC 153277 07/19/2012 000253 POSTMASTER Express Mail & Postal Svcs 17.75 17.75 153278 07/19/2012 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE Jun recruitment ads:HR 1,097.15 1,097.15 COMPANY INC 153279 07/19/2012 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL Jun uniform/11r matftwt rentals:city 1,228.95 SUPPLY Jun uniform/flr mat/twt rentals:civic 743.35 1,972.30 153280 07/19/2012 008964 PULSIFER, JAMES Entertainment:hot summer nights 7/20 750.00 750.00 153281 07/19/2012 011020 RAGLAND, JACK Plein Air Second Place Award 100.00 100.00 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 153282 07/19/2012 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Description Amount Paid Check Total Jun 01-05-19387-1 27498 Enterprise 48.46 Jun 01-05-19378-1 27498 Enterprise 28.47 Jun 01-06-99000-14 28640 Pujol St 9.29 Jun Floating meter - com:PW 207.32 Jun var water meters:TCSD 4,028.53 June var water meters:Fire Stns 738.80 June var water meters:TCSD & PW 2,214.73 June var water meters:TCSD svc lev C 56,843.12 64,118.72 153283 07/19/2012 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN vehicle maint & repair:Stn 84 29.15 29.15 MERCURY 153284 07/19/2012 000907 RANCHO TEMECULA CAR Jun City vehicle detailing srvcs:var 63.00 63.00 WASH 153285 07/19/2012 004498 REPUBLIC INTELLIGENT Signal pole replace:butterfield stage rd 3,480.63 3,480.63 153286 07/19/2012 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & May 2012 legal services 106,821.71 106,821.71 GERSHON 153287 07/19/2012 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT Jun '12 K -Rat payment 230.00 230.00 153288 07/19/2012 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 5/03-30/12 law enforcement 1,544,032.28 1,544,032.28 DEPT 153289 07/19/2012 001365 RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF Jan -Mar vector control services 1,970.72 1,970.72 153290 07/19/2012 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. reimb:APTA Rail cf 6/2-6 Dallas 364.60 364.60 153291 07/19/2012 013827 RYAN MONTELEONE Liefer Road clean up from min damage 1,670.00 1,670.00 EXCAVATION INC 153292 07/19/2012 014297 SALDANA, PATRICIA Refund:security deposit/crc 150.00 150.00 153293 07/19/2012 014845 SCOTT IBEX -SCOTT KAUFMAN sttlmnt: Welcome Home Temecula 157.50 157.50 153294 07/19/2012 008529 SHERIFFS CIVIL DIV- SUPPORT PAYMENT 100.00 100.00 CENTRAL 153295 07/19/2012 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC FY12/13 Procurement Agreement 11,550.00 Jazz © the Merc 7/5/12 499.10 Jazz © the Merc 7/12/12 515.00 12,564.10 153296 07/19/2012 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Recreation supplies:High Hopes 364.45 364.45 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153297 07/19/2012 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Jun 2-28-171-2620:40820 Winchester 1,298.97 Jun 2-31-419-2659:26706 Ynez rd TCI 63.28 1,362.25 153298 07/19/2012 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST pest control srvcs:parks 493.00 CONTROL INC pest control srvcs:o.a.t.c. 48.00 541.00 153299 07/19/2012 005786 SPRINT May 26 -Jun 25 cellular usage/equip 4,931.53 4,931.53 153300 07/19/2012 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC Rfrshmnts:Rod Run/Bluegrass Festival 595.01 595.01 153301 07/19/2012 008023 STATER BROTHERS MARKETS misc supplies:dinnerw/Fire Fighters 100.02 100.02 153302 07/19/2012 009061 STURDIVANT, ANGELA P. TCSD Instructor Eamings 272.16 272.16 153303 07/19/2012 007698 SWANK MOTIONS PICTURES, rental:movies in the park 7/13/12 21.00 21.00 INC. 153304 07/19/2012 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD misc supplies:crc teen room 179.07 SRVCS 153305 07/19/2012 010046 TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION & misc supplies:crc misc supplies:aquatics misc supplies:summer day camp misc supplies:summer day camp 179.20 166.34 223.40 100.85 May' 12 Bus. Impry District Asmnts 108,665.11 May' 12 BID admin fee 848.86 -2,173.30 106,491.81 153306 07/19/2012 007340 TEMECULA VALLEY FIRE Fire Extinguisher Maint Svc:Stn 92 272.00 Fire Extinguisher Maint Svc:Stn 92 85.00 Fire Extinguisher Maint Svc:Stn 84 110.50 467.50 153307 07/19/2012 013997 TEMECULA VALLEY GIRLS Refund:snack bar deposit 200.00 200.00 153308 07/19/2012 010286 TEMECULA VALLEY NATIONAL Refund:snack bar deposit 200.00 200.00 153309 07/19/2012 003067 TEMECULA VALLEY R V Fire trailer repair: Stn 84 1,313.66 SERVICE Veh repair & maint:pd command post 322.45 1,636.11 153310 07/19/2012 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith srvcs:civic center 10.51 10.51 CENTR 153311 07/19/2012 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE July high speed internet:32364 Overland 44.95 44.95 153312 07/19/2012 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL Equip repair& maint:PW Maint 697.39 697.39 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 153313 07/19/2012 000325 UNITED WAY 153314 07/19/2012 004789 VERIZON 153315 07/19/2012 011869 WEITZ, MICHELLE S. Description Amount Paid Check Total United Way Charities Payment July Internet svcs:Library July Internet svcs:Theater Performance:smr concert series 7/26 51.00 51.00 0.08 134.99 135.07 1,500.00 1,500.00 153316 07/19/2012 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 5/16-31 tree trimming srvcs:citywide 13,276.00 6/1-15 tree trimming srvcs:citywide 616.00 13,892.00 153317 07/19/2012 002841 WESTERN OILFIELDS SUPPLY Irrigation rental for 4th of July 4,953.07 4,953.07 CO, DBA: RAIN FOR RENT 153318 07/19/2012 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE Jun '12 TUMF Payment 754,670.16 754,670.16 COUNCIL OF 153319 07/19/2012 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE Jun '12 MSHCP payment 103,912.62 103,912.62 COUNTY 153320 07/19/2012 000230 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SPECIAL TAX CONSULTING:FINANCE 20,880.88 20,880.88 SERVICES DEPT 153321 07/19/2012 013068 WILSON, BRUCE Refund:eng deposit/LD00-077GR 995.00 995.00 153322 07/19/2012 005935 WOODSIDE, SCOTT Refund:Sec. Deposit/CRC 6/29 200.00 200.00 999102 07/13/2012 015068 ABEYTA, [CASEY refund: summer day camp Audrey 192.00 192.00 999103 07/13/2012 015069 BALDWIN, REBEKAH & DANIEL refund: ballroom dance lessons 2240 22.40 999104 07/13/2012 015069 BALDWIN, REBEKAH & DANIEL refund: ballroom dance lessons 2240 22.40 999105 07/13/2012 015070 DUNN, PLESHETTE refund: summer day camp Mikhi 48.00 48.00 999106 07/13/2012 015071 DUVAUCHELLE, MICHELE refund: my first art class Cade 52.00 52.00 999107 07/13/2012 015072 RAYSIN, SHAWN refund: level 4/5 swim lessons Kyle 45.00 45.00 999108 07/13/2012 015073 RESENDIZ, AGUSTIN refund: level 1 swim lessons 72.00 72.00 999109 07/13/2012 015074 STADLER, MELISSA refund: my first art class Kayley 52.00 52.00 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 999110 07/13/2012 015075 WALTER, ROBIN refund: cust bal summer day camp 999111 07/13/2012 015067 RAMOS, YAZMIN MERINO refund: security dep harveston ctr 216.00 216.00 200.00 200.00 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 3,761,331.58 Pagel 1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 07/19/2012 4:44:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA 157 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks. 3,761,331.58 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1970 07/23/2012 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 2nd qtr '12 UI & ET 16,948.45 16,948.45 1971 07/27/2012 005460 U S BANK '11 RDA TABs series A debt service 750,996.88 750,996.88 1972 07/27/2012 005460 U S BANK '06 RDA TABs series A debt service 638,318.13 638,318.13 1973 07/27/2012 005460 U S BANK '10 RDA TABS series B debt service 486,123.22 486,123.22 1974 07/27/2012 005460 U S BANK '10 RDA TABs series A debt service 265,837.50 265,837.50 1975 07/27/2012 005460 U S BANK '02 RDA tax allocation bonds debt srvc 1,155,355.63 1,155,355.63 153323 07/26/2012 006915 ALLIES PARTY EQUIPMENT party rental equip: 4th July RRSP 1,293.92 equip rental: street painting fest 916.63 2,210.55 153324 07/26/2012 012943 ALPHA MECHANICAL SERVICE HVAC maint: MPSC 210.33 210.33 INC 153325 07/26/2012 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES DUI & drug screenings: Police 720.46 (AFN) DUI & drug screenings: Police 211.90 932.36 153326 07/26/2012 014235 AND ALL THAT JAZZ TCSD Instructor Earnings 1,575.00 1,575.00 153327 07/26/2012 014294 ANFINSON, STEVEN performance: hot summer nights 600.00 600.00 153328 07/26/2012 013338 APPLE STORE employee computer loan pgrm 1,457.43 1,457.43 153329 07/26/2012 003814 BALLREICH, MICHAELA employee computer loan program 1,941.17 1,941.17 153330 07/26/2012 008868 BANK OF SACRAMENTO Escrw 2893-165 RJ Noble/Marg Rd prjt 2 12,022.86 12,022.86 153331 07/26/2012 013482 BAS SECURITY security Svcs: 4th of July RRSP 3,185.50 3,185.50 153332 07/26/2012 014293 BIBLIOTHECA ITG, LLC smart label equip: library 570.30 570.30 153333 07/26/2012 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS promo items: 4th of July event 1,962.00 TCSD instructor earnings 1,130.50 3,092.50 153334 07/26/2012 014284 BLAKELY'S TRUCK SERVICE emergency generator repair: CH 1,616.76 1,616.76 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153335 07/26/2012 008605 BONTERRA CONSULTING 5/11-6/8 cnslt:murr creek bridge 18,687.01 18,687.01 153336 07/26/2012 010817 BURNS, DAVID performance: Hot Summer Nights 650.00 650.00 153337 07/26/2012 001035 C R & R INC commercial/recycle bins 443.87 443.87 153338 07/26/2012 004248 CALIF DEPT OF Jun fingerprinting svcs: PD/HR 2,884.00 2,884.00 J USTICE-ACCTING 153339 07/26/2012 014273 CALIFORNIA PROPERTY Jun relocation svc:murr crk/overland 3,768.75 3,768.75 153340 07/26/2012 009640 CERTIFION CORPORATION Jun database subscr: Police 150.00 150.00 153341 07/26/2012 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL misc electrical parts: library 323.25 323.25 DIST. 153342 07/26/2012 014501 COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL mechanical systems svcs: civic ctr 3,699.04 SYSTEMS mechanical systems svcs: civic ctr 2,766.81 6,465.85 153343 07/26/2012 014364 CUNNINGHAM, GRISELDA TCSD Instructor Earnings 735.00 735.00 CLEMENTINA 153344 07/26/2012 008943 DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES ALJ hours: Oasis Center 2,760.00 (DGS) ALJ hours: Gao/Leisure Spa 2,744.00 5,504.00 153345 07/26/2012 015087 DOS PALOS CANINE, INC. regist: K9 trial 8/3-4 Cramer/Staat 140.00 140.00 153346 07/26/2012 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING INC Fuel for City vehicles: PW Maint 1,313.00 Fuel for City vehicles: PW cipild/npdes Fuel for City vehicles: PW Traffic Fuel for City vehicles: Code Enf Fuel for City vehicles: B&S Fuel for City vehicles: PW Id/npdes Fuel for City vehicles: Police 153347 07/26/2012 002981 DYNA MED medical supplies: aquatics 456.10 445.61 357.29 237.36 140.64 38.20 2,988.20 318.11 318.11 153348 07/26/2012 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER July water meter:39656 Diego Dr 357.77 DIST July water meter:39569 Seraphina Rd 236.03 593.80 153349 07/26/2012 011202 EMH SPORTS & FITNESS TCSD instructor earnings 630.00 630.00 INSTITUTE Page:2 apChkLst 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 153350 07/26/2012 004111 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT Demographic Report: Econ Dev DEPT 153351 07/26/2012 015019 ESCUELA DEL SOL TUTORING LLC 153352 07/26/2012 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 153353 07/26/2012 015060 FALLBROOK CHAMBER ORCHESTRA 153354 07/26/2012 010804 FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES 153355 07/26/2012 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings irrigation repairs: harveston park performance: hot summer nights JUN CNSLT SVCS: JEFFERSON CORRIDOR MAY CNSLT SVCS: JEFFERSON COI sttlmnt: Dancing in the Vines Jul '12 153356 07/26/2012 011922 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC Jun database subscrp: Code Enf INC geographic package realquest: Code E Amount Paid Check Total 272.00 892.50 714.00 166.82 300.00 9,883.29 1,131.30 891.26 38.50 272.00 1,606.50 166.82 300.00 11,014.59 891.26 36.00 74.50 Page:3 apChkLst 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 153357 07/26/2012 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC 015094 SPUNTINO 006952 PAYPAL 005531 FRONT STREET BAR & GRILL 015110 BEST SHUTTLE TRANSPORTATION 006087 NATURE WATCH 006690 BEST WESTERN 010865 CONSTANT CONTACT INC 005043 EXECUTIVE VIP AIRPORT SHUTTLE 008956 PANERA BREAD 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 015062 DREAMHOST.COM 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 013338 APPLE STORE 015111 ARCO AM PM 015112 ENVATO.COM 015063 PLIMUS, INC. 009486 SHELL OIL 013851 STORM SOURCE, LLC 013851 STORM SOURCE, LLC 008123 JOANN ETC 015093 RANCHO FRUIT MARKET 153358 07/26/2012 014951 FIRST NIGHT INC. Description AA dvds/cds/books: library Amount Paid Check Total RJ NLC lunch: NLC conf 6/7-6/9 (Partial Reimb. by Abbot SJ meal: closed council mtg 6/26 AA Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction SJ meal: closed council mtg 6/12 RJ NLC airport shuttle: NLC conf 6/7 AA misc supplies: summer explorers camp GB htl:transims cf LA 6/6-6/8 Pina, Art MH Jun domain name: temeculagov RJ NLC airport shuttle: NLC conf 6/7 RJ lunch: CSUSM Roripaugh tour 6/25 AA misc supplies: human svcs MH (2) iPad cases: info tech MH hosting svcs: info tech MH iPad case: info tech MH iPad case: info tech RJ gas: CM vehicle PR wordpress template: econ dev MH card recovery software: info tech RJ NLC transportation: NLC conf 6/7 MH appointments plus: info tech MH appointments plus: info tech RJ NLC tablecloth: NLC conf 6/7 SJ meal: closed council mtg 6/26 12/13 membership: City of Temecula 9,234.75 722.90 t Vascular) 261.00 255.80 220.00 213.00 211.58 201.52 200.00 160.00 118.64 105.96 74.96 69.40 59.95 50.16 40.35 40.00 39.95 36.31 20.00 20.00 18.03 12.00 2,500.00 12,386.26 2,500.00 153359 07/26/2012 000380 FIRST STUDENT CHARTER transportation: summer day camp 7/5 424.81 424.81 Page:4 apChkLst 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 153360 07/26/2012 003633 FOOTHILL EASTERN TRANSPORTN. 153361 07/26/2012 013552 GANDS PRODUCTIONS LLC 153362 07/26/2012 013076 GAUDET, YVONNE M. 153363 07/26/2012 014234 GEARS 2 ROBOTS, LLC 153364 07/26/2012 014436 GOLDEN ARROW ENGINEERING, INC 153365 07/26/2012 014405 GORM INCORPORATED 153366 07/26/2012 014402 GROEPPER, BROOKE ELIZABETH 153367 07/26/2012 009950 HALL, JONATHAN 153368 07/26/2012 004188 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 153369 07/26/2012 015084 HICKS, WAYLON 153370 07/26/2012 015095 HOWARD-STARKS, YVONNE 153371 07/26/2012 003624 HOWELL, ANN MARIE 153372 07/26/2012 010530 I P C INDUSTRIES INC 153373 07/26/2012 004833 IMPERIAL PAVING COMPANY INC 153374 07/26/2012 011228 INLAND PLANNING AND DESIGN INC (Continued) Description Nov -Jun toll roads usage:var. depts sttlmnt: Country at the Merc 7/21 TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings partial retention release: PW11-05 Jun const: CRC energy retrofit misc cleaning supplies: civic ctr misc cleaing supplies: parks/library TCSD instructor earnings employee computer loan program Jun const mgmt: french vlly pkwy performance: hot summer nights refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston May graphic design svcs: Econ Dev June graphic design svcs:eco dev equip rental: 4th of July ASPHALT REPAIRS: SANTIAGO/YNEZ ASPHALT REPAIR: WINCHESTER/DI JUN CNSLT SVCS: JEFFERSON CORRIDOR 153375 07/26/2012 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT Jun copier leases: Civic Center SOLUTIONS Jun copier leases: Library 153376 07/26/2012 014828 JACKSON MFG COMPANY, INC. book return drop bags: library Amount Paid Check Total 120.30 487.50 997.50 1,662.50 17,783.50 12,303.05 2,037.55 1,544.06 500.50 2,000.00 95,344.28 600.00 200.00 3,150.00 2,835.00 378.25 11,590.00 1,400.00 3,800.00 4,499.70 535.08 315.90 120.30 487.50 997.50 1,662.50 30,086.55 3,581.61 500.50 2,000.00 95,344.28 600.00 200.00 5,985.00 378.25 12,990.00 3,800.00 5,034.78 315.90 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 153377 07/26/2012 012285 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY (Continued) 153378 07/26/2012 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC 153379 07/26/2012 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. 153380 07/26/2012 015085 LONG EAR DONKEY RESCUE INC 153381 07/26/2012 015096 LOVE, FLORETTA 153382 07/26/2012 014228 LSK, LLC 153383 07/26/2012 004813 M & J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC 153384 07/26/2012 013311 MATERIAL HANDLING SUPPLY INC 153385 07/26/2012 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC 153386 07/26/2012 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS INC. Description ladder leveler: civic ctr Jun affd housing cnslt svcs TCSD instructor earnings performance: summer camp 7/24 refund:Sr excursion 4100.202 Aug facility lease: harveston center Jolly jump rental:Cinco de Mayo forklift maint/repair:PW Maint Traffic sgnl pole/equip:Marg/Dartolo Rd Marketing & promo srvcs: old town 153387 07/26/2012 004586 MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC tennis ct windscreen: gardner mid sch install steel fence: crc pool 153388 07/26/2012 004238 MURRIETA, CITY OF 153389 07/26/2012 004490 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING INC 153390 07/26/2012 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 153391 07/26/2012 015092 PADILLA, JASON 153392 07/26/2012 015091 PEFFER, DONNA 153393 07/26/2012 000249 PETTY CASH 1/2 pg ad lifelines magazine:Eco relamp field lights: tem middle school relamp field lights: rrsp replace field lights: var sports parks City Vehicle Maint Svcs:Land Dev City Vehicle Maint Svcs:Parks Maint partial refund: N PDES veh viol.:4633 refund:bal. on acct:adv youth tennis Petty Cash Reimbursement Petty Cash Reimbursement Amount Paid Check Total 238.34 238.34 1,453.11 1,453.11 808.50 808.50 600.00 600.00 16.00 16.00 4,853.88 4,853.88 99.00 99.00 114.79 114.79 1,542.89 1,542.89 6,000.00 6,000.00 13, 700.00 2,890.00 16,590.00 500.00 500.00 15, 281.00 11,043.63 6,253.00 32,577.63 541.18 125.46 666.64 200.00 200.00 85.00 85.00 603.64 16.85 620.49 Page:6 apChkLst 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 153394 07/26/2012 015097 POLLERO, ALICE 153395 07/26/2012 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS INC 153396 07/26/2012 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY INC 153397 07/26/2012 003155 PRICE CHOPPER INC 153398 07/26/2012 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY (Continued) Description refund:Deep water aerobics 3940.202 chemicals & supplies: park fountains 6/16/12-7/10/13 subscr:Pln 19575818 Wristbands:aquatics pgrm Jun const:pave rehab marg rd proj 2 153399 07/26/2012 009818 R K ENGINEERING GROUP INC Jun traffic analysis:mira !oma apt dev 153400 07/26/2012 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 153401 07/26/2012 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS 153402 07/26/2012 009725 RAZAVI, MANDIS 153403 07/26/2012 000271 RBF CONSULTING 153404 07/26/2012 013759 RICE, KENNETH 153405 07/26/2012 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR 153406 07/26/2012 003698 RIVERSIDE CO ECONOMIC 153407 07/26/2012 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 153408 07/26/2012 013250 RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, SHERIFF 153409 07/26/2012 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC July var water meters:TCSD svc lev C June Lndscp meter:41951 Moraga Rd June Lndscp meter:40135 Village Rd June Lndscp meter:Calle Elenita June D.C. meter:Landings Rd Blueprints:Land Dev TCSD Instructor Earnings MAY ENG SRVCS:I-15/SR-79 ULT INTRCHG Amount Paid Check Total Performance: Hot Summer Nights 7/27 FY 12/13 LAFCO cost allocation:pin Apr -Jun real property srvcs:f. vly pkwy Interview/Interrogation 9/5-7 1/12/12-06/14/12 YOUTH COURT PGRM Stencil truck repairs & supplies:PW Mntc 32.00 135.77 187.84 240.43 228,434.27 5,285.00 18,830.34 1,459.58 271.28 63.35 15.33 11.85 336.00 17,433.03 600.00 5,235.13 6,851.74 223.00 752.70 32.00 135.77 187.84 240.43 228,434.27 5,285.00 20,639.88 11.85 336.00 17,433.03 600.00 5,235.13 6,851.74 223.00 752.70 513.41 513.41 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153410 07/26/2012 014579 ROADWAY ENGINEERING Rel.stop ntc:CA Prof Eng/library prkg 21,125.00 21,125.00 153411 07/26/2012 012251 ROTH, DONALD J. TCSD Instructor Earnings 630.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 280.00 910.00 153412 07/26/2012 014955 RUGGLES, RAY C. Traffic control & flagger trng:PW 1,000.00 1,000.00 153413 07/26/2012 009568 SEW WHAT? INC. Curtain legs for stage:theater 589.66 589.66 153414 07/26/2012 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Jazz @ the Merc 07/19/12 462.00 462.00 153415 07/26/2012 009013 SISQUOC, LORENE A Lecture & workshop: history museum 7/17 200.00 200.00 153416 07/26/2012 013029 SITEIMPROVE INC Website crawling proofing software:I.T. 1,874.00 1,874.00 153417 07/26/2012 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Misc supplies:day camp 221.15 221.15 153418 07/26/2012 000537 SO CALIF EDISON June 2-00-397-5059:Comm Svc UTL 6,995.55 June 2-26-887-0789:40233 Village rd F 2,313.89 June 2-27-560-0625:32380 Deerhollow 2,171.48 July 2-31-536-3655:41904 Main St 1,338.09 July 2-18-937-3152:28314 Mercedes S 1,160.42 June 2-31-693-9784:26036 Ynez rd TC 329.23 July 2-31-536-3481:41902 Main St 329.15 June 2-30-296-9522:31035 Rancho vis 238.84 July 2-28-904-7706:32329 Overland Tr 132.11 June 2-29-974-7568:26953 Ynez rd TC 121.04 June 2-28-331-4847:32805 Pauba rd L 101.86 June 2-33-237-4818:30499 Rancho cal 82.79 July 2-21-981-4720:30153 Tem pkwy tl 30.62 June 2-33-357-5785:44747 Redhawk 30.14 June 2-30-099-3847:29721 Ryecrest 22.95 15,398.16 153419 07/26/2012 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 153420 07/26/2012 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 153421 07/26/2012 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC July 015-575-0195-2:32211 Wolf vly rd 107.70 June 055-475-6169-5:PHBSP 89.20 196.90 Jul pest control srvcs: stn 84 80.00 80.00 Refreshments:day camp pgrm 7/12 267.41 267.41 153422 07/26/2012 008023 STATER BROTHERS MARKETS refreshments:dinner w/FF prgm 49.93 49.93 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 153423 07/26/2012 001505 STEFFEN, SUE reimb:supplies for City Coucnil mtgs 62.58 62.58 153424 07/26/2012 006145 STENO SOLUTIONS Jun transcription srvcs:Police 854.84 854.84 TRANSCRIPTION 153425 07/26/2012 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC Jul sweeping srvcs: of parking garage 500.00 500.00 153426 07/26/2012 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD Misc supplies:mpsc 53.40 53.40 SRVCS 153427 07/26/2012 010191 TAYLOR, JUDY Performance: History Museum 8/2 150.00 150.00 153428 07/26/2012 014740 TED ENTERPRISES, INC. Release retention:Calle Fiesta storm 7,279.79 7,279.79 153429 07/26/2012 014785 TEDDE, II, ROBERT 50% deposit/performance:smr concert 8/2 900.00 900.00 153430 07/26/2012 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS Motorcycle repair/maint:Tem.P.D. 77.61 77.61 LLC 153431 07/26/2012 010493 TEMECULA TOWNE CENTER Jul lease payment:pd mall office 1,458.33 1,458.33 ASSOC LP 153432 07/26/2012 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Locksmith services:Parks Maint 21.26 21.26 CENTR 153433 07/26/2012 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Aug high speed internet:41000 Main St 4,342.25 July high speed internet:32211 Wolf 102.17 4,444.42 153434 07/26/2012 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC Sound & tech srvcs:summer concert 2,250.00 2,250.00 series 153435 07/26/2012 008977 VALLEY EVENTS INC equip:ground breaking ceremony 2/14 475.00 475.00 153436 07/26/2012 004261 VERIZON June xxx-0074 general usage 2,727.96 July xxx-5072 general usage 1,522.62 July xxx-0073 general usage 101.30 4,351.88 153437 07/26/2012 004789 VERIZON July Internet svcs:Civic Center 269.99 July Internet svcs:Library 174.99 July Internet svcs:Harveston Center 90.00 July Internet svcs:Tem PD DSL 49.99 584.97 153438 07/26/2012 009101 VISION ONE INC Jun ShoWare ticketing srvcs:Theater 2,037.40 2,037.40 Page:9 apChkLst 07/26/2012 Final Check List Page: 10 1:28:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) 153439 07/26/2012 014375 VN ENTERPRISES, INC 153440 07/26/2012 006612 WEATHERPROOFING TECH, INC 153441 07/26/2012 010993 WEAVER, DANA 153442 07/26/2012 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 153443 07/26/2012 000339 WEST PUBLISHING CORP 153444 07/26/2012 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL 999112 07/24/2012 015099 ADAME, SHERI 999113 07/24/2012 015100 ARIAS, JENNIFER 999114 07/24/2012 015101 BELL, PATRICIA 999115 07/24/2012 008303 BUSTAMANTE, LORI 999116 07/24/2012 015102 DREW, DANIELLE 999117 07/24/2012 014996 GREENUP, MICHELLE 999118 07/24/2012 015103 GUNAWAN, HENDRA 999119 07/24/2012 015104 SCHUBERT, SANDY 999120 07/24/2012 015105 MAINGUENE, CAROLYN 999121 07/24/2012 015106 MELNYCHUK, LEAH 999122 07/24/2012 015107 QUE, SHANNON Description Idscp mulch:var park sites replace roof: tem wedding chapel replace roof:sam hicks park restrooms reimb: HUD NEPA trn LA 6/25-29 6/16-30 tree trimming srvcs:Harveston 6/16-30 tree trimming srvcs:Var. Parks tree trimming srvcs:citywide grant 6/16-30 tree trimming srvcs:Dawn Cres 6/16-30 tree trimming srvcs:Big Sage C 6/15-30 tree trimming srvcs:Corte del Jun City hall legal publications Reimb:Artist Reception/Mem.Dedication refund:Teen graphic design 1142.201 refund:Adv toddler swim lessons refund:TVFEE Geometry 9600.205 refund:Health care provider CPR refund:Bear cub univ 4000.202 refund:Extreme youth tennis 1420.202 refund:Advanced youth tennis 1421.202 refund:Pennypickle's wkshp refund:Cardio tennis wkouts 1424.202 refund:Health care provider CPR refund:TVFEE Spanish 2 9600.212 Amount Paid Check Total 2,151.60 18,990.00 15,900.00 225.52 2,151.60 34,890.00 225.52 11,015.00 6,196.00 1,890.00 294.00 138.00 69.00 19,602.00 309.26 309.26 170.68 170.68 36.00 36.00 45.00 45.00 311.00 311.00 15.00 15.00 187.20 187.20 85.00 85.00 170.00 170.00 35.00 35.00 95.00 95.00 65.00 65.00 311.00 311.00 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 07/26/2012 1:28:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 999123 07/24/2012 015108 QUILES, NATHALIE 999124 07/24/2012 011706 QUINN, AMY 999125 07/24/2012 015109 TURNER, SHEILA Description Amount Paid Check Total refund:Teen summer day camp 0406.205 refund:Musical theater dance camp refund:Summer day camp 0405.205 208.00 100.00 96.00 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 208.00 100.00 96.00 4,061,860.09 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 07126/2012 1:28:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA 142 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 4,061,860.09 Page:12 Item No. 4 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager Po -r - go CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Wilson, Chief Financial Officer DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2012 PREPARED BY: Rudy Graciano, Revenue Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2012. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of June 30, 2012. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2012 Investments City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary June 30, 2012 Par Market Value Value Book %of Value Portfolio City of Temecula 41000 Main Street P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA, 92590 (951)694-6430 Days to YTM YTM Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 355 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 60,789,459.56 60,789,459.56 60,789,459.56 42.48 1 1 0.215 0.218 Retention Escrow Account 6,676,366.79 6,676,366.79 6,676,366.79 4.67 1 1 0.000 0.000 Letter of Credit 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 Local Agency Investment Funds 42,658,853.70 42,704,586.05 42,658,853.70 29.81 1 1 0.353 0.358 Federal Agency Callable Securities 14,000,000.00 14,134,220.00 14,000,000.00 9.78 1,546 970 1.837 1.863 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 19,000,000.00 19,168,420.00 18,988,750.00 13.27 1,241 784 1.145 1.160 Investments 143,124,681.05 143, 473, 053.40 143,113,431.05 100.00% 317 200 0.528 0.535 Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 2,1 20,3 43.41 145,245,029.46 2,1 20,343.41 2,1 20,343.41 1 1 0.000 0.000 145,593,401.81 145,233,779.46 317 200 0.528 0.535 Total Earnings June 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Fiscal Year Ending Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 65, 900.98 152, 018, 659.92 0.53% Reporting period 06/01/2012-06/30/2012 Run Date: 97/23/2012 -13:31 938,286.65 141,087,265.46 0.66% 938,286.65 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept8.42 Report Ver. 5.00 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2012 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 1 2221 6003-2 CITY COP RE2 ASSURED GUARANTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1 104348008-1 01-2 IMP 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 104348006-4 01-2 RESA2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 104348016-3 01-2 RESB2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 104348000-4 01-2 SPTAX2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669911-2 03-1 ACQA2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-3 03-1 ACQB3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BON D3 First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-3 03-1 RES A3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669916-2 03-1 RES B2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669900-4 03-1 SPTAX1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593011-2 03-2 ACQ 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593009-2 03-2 EMW D 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593007-2 03-2 IMP 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593016-4 03-2 LOC 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593010-2 03-2 PWADM2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593006-2 03-2 RES 2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593000-3 03-2 SPTX2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727011-2 03-3 ACQ2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727002-2 03-3 BOND 2 First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727007-2 03-3 CITY2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727009 03-3 EMW D 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727006-3 03-3 RES3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 744727000-4 03-3 SP TX 4 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-2 03-4 ADMIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686005-1 03-4 PREP1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686000-1 03-4 RED1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686006-2 03-4 RES2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776002-2 03-6 BON D2 First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776007-2 03-6 IMP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776006-2 03-6 RES2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 786776000-3 03-6 SP TX3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 95453510-2 88-12 BON D2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 95453518-4 88-12 GI4 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 1 2221 6003-4 CITY COP RE4 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 122216008-3 CITY COPCIP2 First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 1 2221 600 0-2 CITY COPLPF2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INTI First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94 43 41 61-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Run Date: 07/23/2012 - 13:31 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.42 Report Ver. 5.00 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2012 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 107886008-2 RDA 06 CIPA2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001 RDA 06 PRIN First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886000-2 RDA O6A INT2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886018-3 RDA 06B CIP3 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-2 RDA O6B INT2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886016-2 RDA 06B RES2 First American Treasury 202,117.75 202,117.75 202,117.75 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 107886030-2 RDA 07 CAPI2 First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886027-2 RDA 07 ESC2 First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886020-2 RDA 07 INT2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886028-2 RDA 07 PROJ2 First American Treasury 209,288.89 209,288.89 209,288.89 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 107886026-2 RDA 07RES2 First American Treasury 1,104,096.37 1,104,096.37 1,104,096.37 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 136343006 RDA 10 DS 1 First American Treasury 1,269,756.48 1,269,756.48 1,269,756.48 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 136343008 RDA 10A CIP2 First American Treasury 07/01/2011 19,946.16 19,946.16 19,946.16 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 136343001-2 RDA 10A -INTI First American Treasury 07/28/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 07/01/2011 1,184,418.23 1,184,418.23 1,184,418.23 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 136343000-1 RDA 106 -INTI First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94432360-2 TCSD COP INT First American Treasury 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 104348006-5 01-2 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 440,473.58 440,473.58 440,473.58 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 104348016-5 01-2 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 202,768.38 202,768.38 202,768.38 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 104348000-5 01-2 SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 820,960.81 820,960.81 820,960.81 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 15,127.38 15,127.38 15,127.38 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 388.92 388.92 388.92 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 864,179.20 864,179.20 864,179.20 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 222,883.24 222,883.24 222,883.24 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 94669000-5 03-01 SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 817,750.92 817,750.92 817,750.92 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 786776006-5 03-06 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 337,941.04 337,941.04 337,941.04 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 786776000-5 03-06SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 528,008.91 528,008.91 528,008.91 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 793593011-5 03-2 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 745,830.80 745,830.80 745,830.80 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 793593009-5 03-2 EMW D11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 5,191.46 5,191.46 5,191.46 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 793593016-5 03-2 LOC1 1 Federated Tax Free Obligations 141,950.43 141,950.43 141,950.43 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 793593010-5 03-2 PWADM11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 397.98 397.98 397.98 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 793593006-5 03-2 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 368.15 368.15 368.15 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 793593000-5 03-2 SPTX Federated Tax Free Obligations 2,249,227.97 2,249,227.97 2,249,227.97 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 793593007-5 03-2-IMPR11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 1,143.99 1,143.99 1,143.99 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 744727006-5 03-3 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 2,171,544.35 2,171,544.35 2,171,544.35 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 744727011-5 03-3ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 1,397.21 1,397.21 1,397.21 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 94686001-5 03-4 ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 5,517.46 5,517.46 5,517.46 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 94686005-5 03-4 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94686000-5 03-4 RED11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 95,424.41 95,424.41 95,424.41 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 Run Date: 07/23/2012 - 13:31 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.42 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2012 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 744727000-5 03-SSPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 146161000-5 146161000-5 Federated Tax Free Obligations 1 461 61 006-5 RDA 11 DS11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 146161008-5 RDA 11ACIP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 1 461 61 009-5 RDA 11ACO111 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94432363 02001 Financial Security Assurance 793593011-1 03-2-1 ACQUI CA Local Agency Investment Fun 793593009-1 03-2-1 EMWD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 793593007-1 03-2-1 IMPRO CA Local Agency Investment Fun 793593010-1 03-2-1 PW AD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 793593006-3 03-2-3 RESER CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1 2221 600 8 CITY COP CIP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 122216003-1 CITY COP RE1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886008-1 RDA 06 CIP-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886018-2 RDA 06 CIP-2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886030-1 RDA 07 CAP -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886027-1 RDA 07 ESC -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886026-1 RDA 07 RES -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886006 RDA 06 RES A MBIA Surety Bond 94434166 RDA TABS RES MBIA Surety Bond SYS95453516-1 95453516-1 USBANK Subtotal and Average 59,087,960.49 73,014.28 73,014.28 73,014.28 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 1,658,177.91 1,658,177.91 1,658,177.91 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 07/27/2011 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 1,308,730.03 1,308,730.03 1,308,730.03 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 13,126,161.82 13,126,161.82 13,126,161.82 0.080 0.079 0.080 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 25,469,638.45 25,469,638.45 25,469,638.45 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 1,572,526.02 1,572,526.02 1,572,526.02 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 290,438.02 290,438.02 290,438.02 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 3,632,327.32 3,632,327.32 3,632,327.32 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 342.57 342.57 342.57 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 60,789,459.56 60,789,459.56 60,789,459.56 0.215 0.218 1 Retention Escrow Account 194012308-16 RJ NOBLE Bank of Sacramento 12/01/2011 216,632.47 216,632.47 216,632.47 0.000 0.000 1 ARMY CORPS Army Corps Union Bank 06/01/2012 600,000.00 600,000.00 600,000.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSPI aza Prtnr PI aza Prtnr Wells Fargo Bank 01/01/2012 4,000,066.86 4,000,066.86 4,000,066.86 0.000 0.000 1 PORTOLA TRRC Portola Trrc Wells Fargo Bank 01/01/2012 1,859,667.46 1,859,667.46 1,859,667.46 0.000 0.000 1 Subtotal and Average 6,676,213.72 6,676,366.79 6,676,366.79 6,676,366.79 0.000 0.000 1 Letter of Credit 104348006-1 02008 ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2011 Subtotal and Average Run Date: 07/23/201 2 - 13:31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.42 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2012 Page 5 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Funds 94669911-1 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 315,746.98 315,746.98 315,746.98 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 94669921-1 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 3,910,890.03 3,910,890.03 3,910,890.03 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 744727011-1 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 933,823.23 933,823.23 933,823.23 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 744727007-1 03-3 CITY 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 786776007-1 03-6 IMP 1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun 22,692,456.54 22,720,133.24 22,692,456.54 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,737.22 1,739.34 1,737.22 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 SYSRDA 10 DS 2 RDA 10 DS 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 SYSRDA 10A CIP1 RDA 10A CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,891.90 1,891.90 1,891.90 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 14,802,307.80 14,820,361.33 14,802,307.80 0.358 0.353 0.358 1 Subtotal and Average 45,295,520.37 42,658,853.70 42,704,586.05 42,658,853.70 0.353 0.358 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 3134G1Y65 01162 Federal Horne Loan Mtg Corp 01/25/2011 1,000,000.00 1,000,850.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 1.500 754 07/25/2014 3134G2NK4 01170 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 07/11/2011 1,000,000.00 1,000,190.00 1,000,000.00 1.125 1.110 1.125 740 07/11/2014 3134G2RX2 01173 Federal Horne Loan Mtg Corp 07/25/2011 1,000,000.00 1,000,470.00 1,000,000.00 1.200 1.184 1.200 754 07/25/2014 3134G3BV1 01179 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/09/2011 1,000,000.00 1,011,540.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.381 1.400 1,622 12/09/2016 3134G3CL2 01181 Federal Horne Loan Mtg Corp 12/16/2011 1,000,000.00 1,005,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1,080 06/16/2015 3134G3PH7 01186 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 02/24/2012 1,000,000.00 1,000,210.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1,515 08/24/2016 3136F9CB7 01088 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/11/2008 2,000,000.00 2,051,640.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 253 03/11/2013 3136F9DP5 01090 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/27/2008 1,000,000.00 1,027,480.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 269 03/27/2013 3136FPZD2 01157 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/03/2010 1,000,000.00 1,003,460.00 1,000,000.00 1.125 1.110 1.125 885 12/03/2014 3136FRZQ9 01171 Federal National Mtg Assn 07/20/2011 1,000,000.00 1,000,480.00 1,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 1.250 841 10/20/2014 3136FRB44 01172 Federal National Mtg Assn 07/22/2011 1,000,000.00 1,016,570.00 1,000,000.00 2.125 2.096 2.125 1,482 07/22/2016 3136FTBQ1 01176 Federal National Mtg Assn 10/24/2011 1,000,000.00 1,011,190.00 1,000,000.00 1.350 1.332 1.350 1,576 10/24/2016 3136FT4R7 01188 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/27/2012 1,000,000.00 1,005,140.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1,549 09/27/2016 Subtotal and Average 14,866,666.67 14,000,000.00 14,134,220.00 14,000,000.00 1.837 1.863 970 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 31331GE47 01135 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/29/2009 1,000,000.00 1,020,680.00 997,500.00 2.250 2.284 2.316 393 07/29/2013 31331GG37 01137 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/04/2009 1,000,000.00 1,011,040.00 1,000,000.00 2.150 2.121 2.150 218 02/04/2013 31331GZ44 01144 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/15/2009 1,000,000.00 1,003,940.00 1,000,000.00 1.550 1.529 1.550 106 10/15/2012 31331KCA6 01164 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/10/2011 1,000,000.00 1,016,570.00 1,000,000.00 1.375 1.356 1.375 589 02/10/2014 31331KTK6 01174 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/01/2011 1,000,000.00 1,010,080.00 1,000,000.00 0.875 0.863 0.875 761 08/01/2014 31331KE55 01175 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/06/2011 1,000,000.00 1,018,770.00 1,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 1.300 1,558 10/06/2016 31331KK5B 01177 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/26/2011 1,000,000.00 1,013,940.00 1,000,000.00 1.050 1.036 1.050 1,212 10/26/2015 31331KV98 01178 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/23/2011 1,000,000.00 1,011,050.00 1,000,000.00 0.970 0.957 0.970 1,240 11/23/2015 Run Date: 07/23/201 2 - 13:31 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.42 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2012 Page 6 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Bullet Securities 31331KY79 01180 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/29/2011 1,000,000.00 1,000,300.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 516 11/29/2013 31331K2P4 01182 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/09/2011 1,000,000.00 1,011,910.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1,256 12/09/2015 31331K6P0 01183 Federal Farm Credit Bank 01/19/2012 1,000,000.00 1,006,170.00 1,000,000.00 0.850 0.838 0.850 1,297 01/19/2016 3133XVEM9 01150 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/04/2009 1,000,000.00 1,005,690.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 143 11/21/2012 313372UH5 01166 Federal Horne Loan Bank 03/15/2011 1,000,000.00 1,009,860.00 1,000,000.00 1.125 1.110 1.125 439 09/13/2013 313374CZ1 01168 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/22/2011 1,000,000.00 1,012,430.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 813 09/22/2014 313376V77 01184 Federal Horne Loan Bank 01/23/2012 1,000,000.00 1,000,770.00 1,000,000.00 0.520 0.513 0.520 936 01/23/2015 313376YQ2 01185 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/13/2012 1,000,000.00 997,470.00 1,000,000.00 0.400 0.395 0.400 957 02/13/2015 313378AC5 01187 Federal Horne Loan Bank 02/22/2012 1,000,000.00 998,990.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 1,055 05/22/2015 313378QH7 01189 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/28/2012 1,000,000.00 1,017,070.00 1,000,000.00 0.900 0.888 0.900 1,366 03/28/2016 31398AYM8 01139 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/10/2009 1,000,000.00 1,001,690.00 991,250.00 1.750 2.024 2.052 40 08/10/2012 Subtotal and Average 19,322,083.33 19,000,000.00 19,168,4 20.00 18, 988, 750.0 0 1.145 1.160 784 Total and Average 152,018,659.92 Run Date: 07/23/2012 - 13:31 143,124,681.05 143,473,053.40 143,113,431.05 0.528 0.535 200 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.42 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash June 30, 2012 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Page 7 Retention Escrow Account SYSAAA#1202 AAA#1202 COMMUNITY BANK 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 4110170281 EDGEDEV TORRY PINES BANK 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 23303800 PCL CONST Wells Fargo Bank 07/01/2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Passbook/Checking Accounts SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2011 2,910.00 2,910.00 2,910.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSFIex Ck Acct Flex Ck Acct Union Bank of California 07/01/2011 26,601.30 26,601.30 26,601.30 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 2,083,921.11 2,083,921.11 2,083,921.11 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2011 6,916.00 6,916.00 6,916.00 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 1 Total Cash and Investments 152,018,659.92 Run Date: 07/23/201 2 - 13:31 145, 245,029.46 145, 593,401.81 145,233,779.46 0.528 0.535 200 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.42 CITY OF TEMECULA CASH BALANCES AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 Fund # Fund Name Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $ 33,466,541.75 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 1,773,159.96 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 6,342,016.59 150 AB 2766 FUND 244,667.36 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 24,253,490.39 170 MEASUREA FUND 5,443,156.19 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 1,073,409.15 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 67,230.94 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 63,650.49 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT 10,062.66 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 279,551.36 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 124,473.77 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 14,295,266.74 273 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL IMPROVEMENT FUND 4,242,153.31 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 935,220.44 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 27,794,330.72 260 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY- CIP PROJECT 166,535.94 300 INSURANCE FUND 357,616.96 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 1,152,656.71 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 265,921.42 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 313,674.03 340 FACILITIES 63,553.10 375 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM 17,997.62 360 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,906,665.57 460 CFD 66-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 65,060.60 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 1,495,366.59 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,953,404.56 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 177,666.64 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,161,476.91 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 914,932.43 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 7,665,163.51 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 27,355.33 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 55,664.63 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 33,575.53 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 4,564.42 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 19,265.65 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 15,64942 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 6,665.91 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 VILLAGE GROVE 56,67902 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 15,246.20 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 9,47a 74 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 1,526.06 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 51,926.47 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 7,65924 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 7,067.15 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 3,653.77 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE I6TRADEWINDS 72,706.90 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 1,226.65 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TEMEKU HILLS 46,236.03 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE I9CHANTEMAR 61,356.31 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 176,69931 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 154,675.13 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 2,137.91 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 12,651.05 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 165,927.42 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 40,196.45 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERY TRADITION 663.12 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 2,616.13 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 WOLF CREEK 265,764.49 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 5,64937 530 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 33,023.47 Grand Total: $ 145,593,401.81 Item No. 5 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager ffi/re-r- Ad CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Andre O'Harra, Chief of Police DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Amendment to Fiscal Year 2011-12 Bio-Tox Agreement PREPARED BY: Heidi Schrader, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve an amendment to the fiscal year 2011-12 Agreement between City of Temecula and Bio-Tox Laboratories for DUI Drug and Alcohol Screening Services to increase the payment amount to $36,000; 2. Approve an additional expenditure of $6,000 for a total annual expenditure of $36,000 to Bio-Tox Laboratories for fiscal year 2011-12. BACKGROUND: The City uses Bio-Tox Laboratories for DUI and Drug analysis within the City of Temecula. Temecula pays for all DUI and drug testing performed on drivers apprehended within the City limits by any authorized Law Enforcement agency. The City of Temecula Police Department and Temecula Area of the California Highway Patrol utilize Bio- Tox Laboratories for almost all drug and alcohol screenings utilizing blood and/or urine. Bio-Tox is one of two vendors, providing this service, the other being the California Department of Justice. The payment term of the agreement includes an additional $6,000 for fiscal year 2011-12 as the previous contract limit was reached prior to the end of June 2012. Although it was estimated that services for Bio-Tox would not exceed $30,000 in fiscal year 2011-12, there has been a spike in services in the last two months of fiscal year 2011-12. A portion of this increase is due to a DUI Mini Grant the City obtained from the California Office of Traffic Safety. This grant pays for six DUI checkpoints within fiscal year 2011-12 and 2012-13. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds remain within the Police Department fiscal year 2011-12 Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: First Amendment to Agreement between City of Temecula and Bio-Tox Laboratories for DUI Drug and Alcohol Screening Services. PD12-12 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND BIO-TOX LABORATORIES FOR DUI DRUG & ALCOHOL SCREENING SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 14, 2012 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Bio-Tox Laboratories, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2011, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for "DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening Services", in the amount of $30,000.00. b. The parties now desire to increase the fiscal year 2011112 payment in the amount of $6,000.00 and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The First Amendment amount shall not exceed Six Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($6,000.00), for additional drug and alcohol testing for fiscal year 2011-2012 for a total Agreement amount of Thirty -Six Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($36,000.00). 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 R:/Finance/Agreements/Finance Dept Agreements/Agreements 2011-2012/Bio Tox Lab Services.Amend 1.PD12-12.7-12-12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA BIO-TOX LABORATORIES (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Chuck Washington, Mayor Dale R. Somers, Chief Executive Officer/President ATTEST: By: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk Tracey Stangarone, Chief Financial Officer/Business Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Bio-Tox Laboratories Attn: Tracey Stangarone 1965 Chicago Avenue, Ste. C Riverside, CA 92507 951-341-9355 951-341-9359 tracey(a�biotoxlabs.com PM Initials: q Date: Y 2 R:/Finance/Agreements/Finance Dept Agreements/Agreements 2011-2012/Bio Tox Lab Services.Amend 1.PD12-12.7-12-12 •Y ACC Rise CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE nneto lVYY) 06/06/7012 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pollcy(les► must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, sub}ect to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the cerUflcate holder In (leu of such endorsement(,). vROOUCFR LIC e0929.170 1-925-I5a-7700 Rdgewood Partnere :neurance Centers (EPIC) (Irvine Branch) P.C. Box 5003 Sam Ream, CA 94503 1 '/' ' L.:. 'Iti(.Vi<d _. _. . _, J CONTACT N Od Partners Insurance Liter 901-0671 JPAHICO_NEtisk (128) 266-7700 PAX tIAIC.Nl3 (925) geNooOlne.o, 1MrE Y1CcesteQedo NMNtEIgO(ANaRpNB C01161AOi _ /,A1C 33111 k., 19690 • 36630 YMtIRIRA: LAYOYAB[ AES MIS CO 2COIl01K ESN (10 PUREE 8iotol / Mettle Laboratories RE O 1m) lt 1R0 1965 Chicago Avenue, Suite C *I'llics ©1' t JUN�TD1Z Riverside, CA 92507 FAmoOCLB .BIR 61,000,000 x oOae/ER(:�Al DERE uaalRY PIPMER e : • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDIT:ON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUII NT NTTH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES DESCRIBED HEREIN 15 SUBJECT TO AU. THE TERMS, _ EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. Ltiyt T17EpMNRIAIICE elan aY4 1'O11L1M�01 POLIC1I i.aransYYYVI IYMIB A 0INIMLISRuty TM.CS10600 - 06/01/12 08/01/13 FAmoOCLB .BIR 61,000,000 x oOae/ER(:�Al DERE uaalRY PREMISESay 6 50.000 - 2 atemeacel MED ESP(AINAaepuial) 35.000 Z BI/PD t 2,500 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1.000.000 GENERAL AOIRIBOATE 6 8 O�EINL AGGREIG�ATEI Leel APIPL�EIS PER PRODUCTS.CO1I10PA06 61.000.000 POLICY I1 1 ( i LOC 2 El UAIMUIY 01C10802745 06101/17 06/01/13 comma)ma1.ELISIT Eacoewn 61,000,000 ~ _ ANY AUTO _ _ / O0 .Y NANNY (Per meant 6 — ALL ONMEO AUTOS _ SCHEDULED AUTOS / BOORT MAW (Per erslarq $ 2 HIRED AUTOS Z YlED wow fL� �,� 1'ER TM 6 4(Jr 6 UMSNl1ANAO _ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ CH SUUAb —1 c s OE it AOOREOATE 76 l OLD REIEmbON6 8 C WORMERSCO PENSAT10M Asommowitrumam 220005761)131 06/O1/1: 06/01/13 ZI WC uIqS R I 1FR iO1tY 11W YIN ARYmaRe ETORPARTNEREZECUroE OFfICSHAAENSER EXCLUDE0? MIA /EL. EAOHAOCIDFM 11.000.000 1' Nr $1,000,000 Illanememy El. DISEASE � EAMMOYEE Myes. b~MJ und DESCLLVTION OF OPERATIONS serer EL CISFAS. . POLICYLYR 61.000.000 A 260 Claims Nhad► ,500/61aL V LUC818688 06/01/1: 06/01/13 / Bed Prof Lich Per Claim 1,000,000 / Cmbiced Agg /3,000,000 to Of OPERATIONS/ Tides VEHICLES�R/y/AcOA 101, Addl... Ream. ech.aar. 1 won reqss..9 / RE: roti the Named Danny wb� R ADDITIOIIAL ILTSOILEDI City of Temecula, Temecula Community BerViCea Dirrtrlct and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment liability Agency under the general and auto llablitty'0ol iciee CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of Temecula //P,i! P.O. DOA 9033 Tse la, CA 92599 USA , /5THE 11- SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICES BE CANCELLED BEFORE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. NOTICE WILL BE DEUVERED IN ACCORDAIICE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTIIDRIIlD RiJN1[,lNTATAIE ACORD 25 (2010105) r)ohneonl-cry 27568226 01968-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 3 R:IFinance/Agreements/Finance Dept Agreements/Agreements 2011-2012IBio Tox Lab Services.Amend 1.PD12-12.7-12-12 1 m R 0 �"yU g w N elpflPtn .7D ii!JIJ S .� oa>me^ I 3Y § a YptyoY ;7•$e.1gR fin - 3�; sggs2gIA.Z ° V a7�COO alOZAYsa`t .nC i;J aJ1P! trd OY $ 1 3 7zcx g. - yy ]g� ng 44 > gu 13 b1 i aVI !II $ �Ia 1 iL' t ill 3f :fl J a3 s $" ea Q. 52 Fa moi °' §'e I.•.4a Ys 3 4$x; 6 $:1 ?fir s�'l 2 alff.Y 1 z 0 1. N d a N Piz ,� UO() 7 a �'G.pae " a v o uc)8 c } -s j n o r y�1 y� 8 �, il141. fli a YI-'"i df� 24.a� •j Q� e o3l .go nSd gc$'ddu�411 :11;o' §f���•Sf°$b.7 ��7'. �.�,�fi O�9gQ.r3��3 ag�os n o #, S A -011-a.4 11 5fi1;;VV? 5 Sia 1!I i i/3ao 2".< !; gG <-�65vacf,;4 io6 ii! v n� gum$ xc o a ivbc o .7n 4*1 a° !yt��QTyyyp'rrgkgsra ;b�§.1gQag>a,A `Y p3 sr a L `FQ d8 i%'o � ^ Q ia ,if :-i5 7 Qi is i 3°'. o MI ■ 4 R:IFinancelAgreements/Finance Dept Agreements/Agreements 2011-2012IBio Tox Lab Services.Amend 1.PD12-12.7-12-12 0 z 0 0 n Ra 0 173 y 2 GLASS REPAIR - WAIVER OF DEDUCTIBLE a 3 a 3 22—ii o - < C O `e . 11 S pPM q g S I g 114/i aC :4 C ��Q N4X n ci n' n P 05 ill 11. 1 "�q i2� � t:1)3 m a Rg - ' p ` ryg i fAcfaQn11�(�a f y QLjp 340 s dal § a I a' o.°o mG 9 aqm' o "g85 S2 p 2 Osakm gI s 4p 3$a bE o$m a�]Qii 3 7 5 R:IFinancelAgreements/Finance Dept Agreements/Agreements 2011-2012IBio Tox Lab Services.Amend 1.PD12-12.7-12-12 V C a PI 11414 ,we VH DM 0 5wr `�> mZ1 a' '4. Om ;3 111 '" O 3 s w w D 9 k,0m5niV$ g� daz a a 0.. o g !�D a 5' o h qN :s me ..itqA 2p a2cD i- �Foil .gin sA r RI fa, gg qA gq li 16y11 T,4,8,1- v Ah Z m 0 �am�D pm WI oK.,?m vA�smx� $1 a :,43 13 a z Olt ° tg niliol n' �'h a o.,..° 0 ig ad 741 a 3 Aa rg ar n ffa qiiim Hik °t°.. :?.,4 `�Zmm1 qi;! a4io OS •e,$i1 $l64',3° 05 02 0!: Wi 4! !!!!It fa! ii11H! if 11ig a_R oria "O'k � 2°iZags UN - 1 gt 2/ 114 33Lg,Er ai 3°SQA -` s a it BLANKET ADQrIONAL INSURED 6 R:IFinancelAgreements/Finance Dept Agreements/Agreements 2011-20121Bio Tox Lab Services.Amend 1.PD12-12.7-12-12 F.dl(rwood Paulsen In.uraace ( reicrf (F VI( 1 • PO RA Cl/Ili San Ramon. 94561 tna..n'o Electronic Sen ice lit wit ski" 12171 1.0129 AT (1.371 1iy,Lullh41lllinin:I,IhhtIIhilliiPP/P .Ii Iu4hlll City of Tenacula P.O. 80X 9033 TEMECULA. CA 92669-9031 3 -DILL '1.23 EBIX BPO This document was brought to you by Certificatesnow. - If you have question• regarding the content of this document, please - call (1/9S) 744-7700 and ask for an available certificates team member. - Ivor new certificate requests or if you need changes made to an *elating certificate, please forward the current certificate Issued with requested changes - via a -nail: IPSCcerteSedpevocdins.cam or Ivacsimile: (925) 901 -0671 - Please Note: All requeate for new certificates or changes to existing certificates must be requested by the Named Insured. - cc: Tho dole included in Inds notice end In the attached document is conridential 10 Ebix BPO and the party responsible for bringing you this intormabon. 7 R:IFinancelAgreements/Finance Dept Agreements/Agreements 2011-20121Bio Tox Lab Services.Amend 1.PD12-12.7-12-12 Item No. 6 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager Piie-r- AA) rA, CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Roripaugh Ranch Project — Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding with the owners of several Planning Areas that provides a framework for the negotiation of a future Operating Memorandum concerning (1) separation of the planning and permitting process for Planning Areas, (2) completion of the Phase I Neighborhood Park and disposition of the Development Impact Fees for this Park, and (3) development of a priority list for use of Roripaugh Ranch Community Facilities District funds for the remaining public improvements RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, Roripaugh Investors III, LLC, Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC, Roripaugh Valley Neighborhood Park, LLC, HRA Roripaugh 1 LLC, HRA Roripaugh 2 LLC, and Sunwood Roripaugh Ranch LLC. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING The proposed Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU) would provide a framework for the negotiation of a future Operating Memorandum concerning the following proposed terms: (1) separation of the planning and permitting process for Planning Areas; (2) completion of the Phase I (Panhandle) Neighborhood Park and disposition of the Development Impact Fees for this Park; and (3) development of a priority list for use of Roripaugh Ranch Community Facilities District funds for the remaining public improvements. The proposed MOU also provides that in the negotiation of the future Operating Memorandum, the parties would also insure that the proposed Operating Memorandum protects the City in the following manner: (1) continue to provide for the completion of such public improvements as are necessary to support the residential and commercial uses in the various areas prior to the issuance of building permits for those uses; (2) continue to provide for the implementation of the City's obligations under the agreements for the issuance of the Bonds and for the protection of the Bonds and the rights of the Bondholders; (3) provide for the maintenance of the public and private improvements by a homeowner association or associations. The MOU is only an agreement to negotiate the future Operating Memorandum. The City is not obligated to approve the proposed changes—only to negotiate them in good faith. Once the terms are negotiated by the Staff, the proposed new Operating Memorandum will be presented to the City Council in open session for review and discussion. BACKGROUND: Specific Plan and Development Agreement On November 26, 2002, the City Council approved the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) which provides a specific plan for 804.7 acres in the north east portion of Temecula. The Specific Plan provides for the development of: (1) a maximum of 2,015 dwelling units (but is currently planned for 1,745); (2) 110,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial retail space; (3) a 12 acre elementary school site; (4) a 20 -acre middle school site; (5) a 19.7 acre sports park (Planning Area 27); (6) a 5.1 acre neighborhood park (Planning Area 6); (7) a fire station site and fire station (Planning Area 32); (8) 202.7 acres of natural open space, flood control improvements to Santa Gertrudes Creek and Long Valley Wash; and (9) on-site and off-site public infrastructure improvements ("Project" or "Roripaugh Ranch Project"). On December 17, 2002 the City Council also approved a Development Agreement for the Roripaugh Ranch Project ("Development Agreement"). The Development Agreement contains provisions that: (1) Vests authorized land uses and land use requirements for the Project; (2) provides for certain development fee credits based on the developer's construction of designated public improvements; and (3) conditions the issuance of building permits on the completion of designated public improvements necessary to mitigate the impacts of the Project. CFD Bonds for Public Improvements On April 27, 2006, the Temecula Public Financing Authority issued $51,250,000 Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), 2006 Special Tax Bonds ("Bonds"). The Community Facilities District comprises the area of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proceeds of the Bonds will finance the construction of certain designated public improvements to mitigate impacts of the Project. The debt service on the Bonds is paid for with Special Taxes levied only on property within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area. All special taxes have been paid. On May 12, 2009, the City Council and the Authority approved an Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement. This Agreement provides that the City is authorized to construct and complete the designated Priority Public Improvements (as described in the Agreement, but principally Butterfield Stage Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road) and may construct other public improvements authorized by the Bond Documents if it elects to do so. With the ownership of the Roripaugh Ranch Project now split among several owners without a master developer, the construction of Butterfield Field Stage Road could most efficiently be constructed by the City. The City's costs to construct the Priority Public Improvements will be paid directly with Bond proceeds. The Agreement also provided for the payment of certain funds to contractors and suppliers who furnished material and labor for the public improvements and were distributed through an escrow agreement. The first phase of construction of Butterfield Stage Road is nearing completion and the request for bids for the second phase will be authorized on August 14, 2012. Ownership Changes The original developer, Ashby USA, LLC, no longer has any interest in the Roripaugh Ranch Project or the Development Agreement. Ownership is split among several owners who have acquired their respective properties by foreclosure sale or acquisition of the Ashby USA loans from AmTrust Bank/Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. AmTrust was the lender for Ashby USA, LLC, and was taken over by the FDIC. All applicable agreements between the City and Ashby USA LLC were assigned to Roripaugh Valley Restoration LLC pursuant to an Assignment Agreement approved by the City Council on April 26, 2010. Roripaugh Valley Restoration LLC owns most of the Phase II (Pan) properties of the Project. A map showing the various ownerships and their respective properties is attached to the proposed MOU. DISCUSSION Proposed Term—Coordination of Planning and Processing of Planning Areas. The first term to be negotiated under the MOU would provide that the City would recognize each of the Owners of the various Planning Areas of the Roripaugh Ranch Project as an "Owner" for purposes of the Development Agreement. It is the multiple ownerships of the Planning Areas and the absence of a master developer that has created the need to coordinate the planning and processing of land use entitlements in the various Planning Areas and to coordinate the prioritization public improvements to be funded with the proceeds of the CFD Bonds. Under this proposed term, each Planning Area would be treated separately for planning and permitting purposes. The issuance of building permits for each Planning Area would be remain subject to the completion of the Public Infrastructure Improvements thresholds, as required by the Development Agreement and the Specific Plan, but no Owner would be deemed to have assumed the obligations of Ashby USA LLC to complete the Public Infrastructure Improvements. Each Owner's compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreement would be determined on a case-by-case basis, based solely on the compliance of each separate Owner and such Owner's Planning Areas with the requirements of the Development Agreement. Each Owner would still be obligated to comply with the threshold requirements for completion of the Public Improvements required by the Development Agreement and Specific Plan prior to obtaining building permits for their respective Planning Areas, but no Owner would be deemed to have assumed the obligations of Ashby USA LLC as a master developer under the Development Agreement, but. Phase 15.1 Acre Neighborhood Park The second term of the proposed Operating Memorandum to be negotiated would provide that the Phase I Neighborhood Park would not be a requirement or expense to be borne by the Owners of the Phase II (Pan) Area. Under Operating Memorandum Nos. 5 and 6 HRA and Sunwood agreed to pay $625,000 in Development Impact Fees to the City for the 5.1 acre Neighborhood Park that would be refunded upon completion of the Park. The proposed Operating Memoranda would confirm that HRA and Sunwood have agreed to partially assign to the party that actually constructs the Park their respective rights to Park DIF Reimbursements Remaining CFD Public Improvement Funds The third term of the proposed Operating Memorandum to be negotiated would provide that all remaining funds available to the CFD would be prioritized for the completion of public improvements in a manner oriented toward accelerating the issuance of building permits for the Phase II (Pan) Tracts, subject to reimbursement of traffic signal costs in the Phase I (Panhandle) Area, and with no changes to current plans for completion of Murrieta Hot Springs and Butterfield Roads that would limit, affect or prevent any Panhandle Tract Owner's ability to obtain building or occupancy permits. The proposed Operating Memorandum will continue to require the threshold Public Improvements be completed before building permits would be issued to owners in the Phase II (Pan) Tracts. Other Provisions for the Protection of the City In negotiating the proposed Operating Memorandum, the Staff will continue the Council policy that the public improvements required to serve a housing development be in place prior to the occupancy of those homes that are served by the public improvements. The proposed Operating Memorandum would continue to provide for the implementation of the City's obligations under the agreements for the issuance of the Bonds and for the protection of the Bonds and the rights of the Bondholders. Finally, in negotiating the proposed Operating Memorandum, the Staff will continue to provide terms as are necessary to provide for the maintenance of the public and private improvements by a homeowner association or associations. FISCAL IMPACT: None. This is only an agreement to negotiate the proposed changes. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Memorandum of Understanding with map of Roripaugh Ranch ownerships AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("Memorandum") is made and entered into as of August , 2012, by and between City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Roripaugh Investors III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("RI -3"), Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("RVR"), Roripaugh Valley Neighborhood Park, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("RVR Park" and collectively as the "RVR Parties), HRA Roripaugh 1 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("HRA 1"), HRA Roripaugh 2 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("HRA 2" and collectively as "HRA") and Sunwood Roripaugh Ranch LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Sunwood"). Each of the foregoing shall herein be referred to as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties". In consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed as follows: RECITALS: A. On December 17, 2002, the City and Ashby USA, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Ashby") entered into that certain agreement entitled "Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC" which Development Agreement was recorded on January 9, 2003 in the Official Records of Riverside County ("Official Records") as Document No. 2003-108567, which was amended on February 28, 2006 by the "First Amendment to Development Agreement Between City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC" recorded on March 7, 2006 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2006-0162268 (collectively, the "Development Agreement"). B. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was approved by the City on November 26, 2002 and was amended on January 11, 2005 and February 14, 2006 (the "Specific Plan"). The Specific Plan is part of the Development Plan as defined in Section 1 of the Development Agreement. "Project" as used herein, means that the development project described in the Development Agreement and the Specific Plan. C. The Specific Plan and Development Agreement require the construction of certain public improvements necessary to support the homes to be built within the Project. The Specific Plan and Development Agreement further provide that the issuance of building permits is dependent on the completion of specific public improvements as set forth in the Specific Plan and Development Agreement, in order that the homes are not constructed without completion of the public improvements necessary to support the homes. D. The Project was originally intended to be developed in phases, as a single, integrated mixed use project. The initial phase, commonly known (and sometimes referred to herein as the "Panhandle"), consists of : (i) approximately 515 residential lots in five (5) separate tracts (each a "Panhandle Tract" and collectively the "Panhandle Tracts"), each of which is currently owned by one (1) or more parties (each a "Panhandle Tract Owner" and collectively the "Panhandle Tract Owners"); and (ii) future phases of the Project were intended to be developed within the area commonly known (and referred to herein) as the "Pan", 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 consisting of approximately 1,500 residential lots distributed among various separate tracts (each a "Pan Tract"), each of which is currently owned by RVR and one (1) or more other owners (the "Pan Tract Owners"). E. Section 3.5.5 of the Development Agreement authorizes an Owner and the City to approve an "Operating Memorandum which does not constitute an amendment to the Development Agreement, in order to implement the Development Agreement or provide for "changes, adjustments, or clarifications [that] are appropriate to further the intended purposes" of the Development Agreement. The First Operating Memorandum was entered into on October 21, 2004 and was recorded November 3, 2004 as Document No. 2004-0874441 of Official Records of the Riverside County Recorder, the Second Operating Memorandum was entered into on March 21, 2006 and was recorded on March 30, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0225016 of Official Records, the Third Operating Memorandum was entered into on August 31, 2006 and was recorded October 19, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0770494 of Official Records, the Fourth Operating Memorandum was entered into on March 6, 2007 and was recorded on March 8, 2007 as Document No, 2007-0160512 in the Official Records, the Fifth Operating Memorandum (the "Fifth Operating Memorandum") was entered into on October 26, 2010 and was recorded on November 18, 2010 as Document No. 2010-0557219 in the Official Records and the Sixth Operating Memorandum (the "Sixth Operating Memorandum") was entered into on January 25, 2011 as Document No. 2011-0093836 in the Official Records (collectively the "Operating Memoranda"). F. On April 27, 2006, the Temecula Public Financing Authority issued $51,250,000 Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), 2006 Special Tax Bonds ("Bonds"). The Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD") comprises the area of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proceeds of the Bonds were to finance the construction of certain designated public improvements to mitigate impacts of the Project. The debt service on the Bonds is paid for with Special Taxes levied on the property within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. G. On or about July 21, 2009, the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") and Ashby entered into that certain Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement (the "Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement"). Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement, Ashby agreed that the City would construct the Phase I public improvements as described in the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement, and the Authority agreed to fund the City's construction of such improvements through the Authority's Communities Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD"). H. In the Fifth Operating Memorandum, the City agreed to issue 199 building permits to HRA prior to the completion of all of the Phase I public improvements subject to the conditions and terms set forth in such Fifth Operating Memorandum. I. Pursuant to the Sixth Operating Memorandum, the City agreed to issue to Sunwood 113 building permits for its property, to BHT Roripaugh WB 99, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("BHT") 99 building permits for its property, and to Wingsweep Corporation a California corporation ("Wingsweep") 98 building permits for its property, of the 515 building permits for Phase I of the Project prior to the completion of all of the Phase I public 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal -2- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 improvements subject to the conditions and terms set forth in such Sixth Operating Memorandum. J. Pursuant to the Fifth Operating Memorandum and the Sixth Operating Memorandum, it was agreed that no credit for the "park and recreation DIF component" described in Section 4.1.1.5 of the Development Agreement would be allowed and that the various owners who entered into these Operating Memoranda would pay the entire DIF fee for the 5.1 Acre Neighborhood Park (the "Phase I Neighborhood Park"). However, upon the completion of the Phase I Neighborhood Park, the City agreed to refund the park and recreation DIF, without interest, within 45 days following the City's acceptance thereof along with the street and right of way improvements described in Section 4.1.1.5.c of the Development Agreement. K. Ashby caused to be recorded with respect to the Project (i) a Declaration of Development Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Roripaugh Ranch recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County on May 15, 2003 as Document No. 2003-351750 ("Development Declaration"), and (ii) a Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, and Reservations of Easements for Roripaugh Ranch, which was recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County on May 15, 2003 as Document No. 2003 351751 ("Master Declaration"). L. RI -3 is the fee owner of three (3) non-residential Panhandle lots, consisting of (i) Planning Area 5, a nearly completed recreation building, pool and associated improvements (collectively, the "Clubhouse Parcel"), and (ii) Planning Areas 1A and 7A reserved for open space, trails, park, detention basin and similar uses (the "Open Space Parcels"). The Clubhouse Parcel and the Open Space Parcels are herein referred to as the "RI -3 Property". The RI -3 Property is located in Phase I of the Project (Panhandle Area). M. RI -3 acquired the RI -3 Property in July 2010 by foreclosure of the deed of trust that RI -3 acquired through the bankruptcy of USA Investment Partners, LLC ("USAIP"). N. RVR is the fee owner of Planning Areas 14-31 of the Project (the "RVR Property"). RVR Park owns Planning Area 6, the site of the Phase I Neighborhood Park. The RVR Parcels were acquired from Ashby through a Deed in Lieu Settlement Agreement with AmT CADC Venture, LLC ("AmT"), the successor to Ohio Savings Bank, a Federal Savings Bank ("OSB"). AmT continues to hold a first lien deed of trust securing the original loan made by Ashby in favor of OSB. O. A map of the various planning areas of Roripaugh Ranch is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Each of the owners shown on said Exhibit is herein referenced as an "Owner". Each of the Planning Areas shown on said Exhibit is herein referred to as a "Planning Area". P. Through separate transactions, Ashby purported to transfer the rights of the Declarant under the Development Declaration and the Master Declaration to both RI -3 and RVR. Both RI -3 and RVR assert ownership claims with respect to the RI -3 Property (the "Dispute"). RI -3 and RVR have agreed to settle the Dispute as hereinafter described (the "Settlement"). 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal -3- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 Q. This Memorandum is intended to create a pathway for the negotiation of one or more Operating Memoranda concerning the following general terms, more specifically described in Section 2: (i) acknowledge and implement the Settlement of the Dispute; (ii) memorialize the fact that the Project ownership has become fragmented as a result of Ashby's defaults under its Project loans and provide for the coordination of construction of all public improvement and the maintenance obligations for improvements as originally contemplated by the Development Agreement; (iii) allow the Project to be entitled, processed and permitted as separate projects under the ownership of "Owners" as contemplated by Section 2.5 of the Development Agreement; and (iv) to create a pathway for the negotiation of a Operating Memorandum with RVR with respect to its Planning Areas. 1 Settlement. RI -3 and the RVR Parties warrant and represent to the City that they have agreed to settle the Dispute and the City hereby acknowledges (without consenting to or in any way becoming a party to the Settlement) that RI -3 and the RVR Parties have agreed to settle the Dispute on the following basis: (i) AMT and the RVR Parties are to relinquish all claims to the RI -3 Property; (ii) The RVR Parties will agree not to assert any claim to "Declarant" status under the Development Declaration and the Master Declaration with respect to the Panhandle Tracts; (iii) RI -3 has agreed to waive any claim to Declarant status under the Development Declaration and the Master Declaration with respect to the Pan Tracts owned by the RVR Parties ; (iv) The Pan Tracts owned by the RVR Parties shall not be annexed to or become part of the Master HOA of the Project pursuant to the Master Declaration; (v) With respect to the Pan Tracts owned by Wingsweep (Planning Areas 10, 11 and 12) and those additional tracts owned by Wingsweep (Planning Areas 33A and 33B) (collectively, the "Wingsweep Non -Panhandle Tracts"), RI -3 shall not seek to exercise any annexation or other rights as declarant under the Master Declaration, and neither RI -3 nor RVR shall seek to exercise any rights as declarant under the Development Declaration, except (i) in the case of RI -3, to the extent that Wingsweep seeks to annex to the Master Declaration in the Panhandle and RI -3 is willing to permit such annexation, or (ii) in the case of RVR, to the extent that Wingsweep seeks to annex to the homeowner association to be formed in the Pan. In this regard, RI -3 and the RVR Parties intend that Wingsweep be permitted, in each case at Wingsweep's option, to annex to the Master Declaration in the Panhandle (if RI -3 is willing to accept such annexation), to annex to the homeowner association to be formed in the Pan (if 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal -4- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 RVR is willing to accept such annexation), or to form its own homeowner association for the Wingsweep Non -Panhandle Tracts. (vi) HRA and Sunwood have agreed to partially assign to the party that actually constructs the Phase I Park ("Constructing Party") their rights to reimbursement of the approximately $2,800 to be paid by each at the time of building permit issuance, which would otherwise be reimbursed to HRA or Sunwood following completion of the Phase I Neighborhood Park pursuant to Section 3.A.6 of the Fifth Operating Memorandum or Section 5.A.6 of the Sixth Operating Memorandum, respectively (as applicable, the "Park DIF Reimbursement "), with the portion so assigned totaling $625,000 when all the HRA and Sunwood lots have become eligible for such reimbursements; and (vii) Upon the City's approval of this Memorandum, subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement (defined in Section 8 below), RI -3 shall dismiss with prejudice that certain action previously filed with respect to the Dispute and currently pending in the Riverside Superior Court as Case No. RIC 1201193. 2 Agreement to Negotiate. (i) The City and RVR shall negotiate in good faith, without being bound to agree, one or more Operating Memoranda, consistent with the requirements of Section 3.5.5 of the Development Agreement, based on the following proposed terms and concepts: a. The City would recognize each of the Owners of the various Planning Areas as an "Owner" for purposes of the Development Agreement. Accordingly, each Planning Area would benefit from and shall be subject to the terms of the Development Agreement. Each Planning Area would be treated separately for planning and permitting purposes. No Owner would be deemed to have assumed the obligations of Ashby to complete any of the Public Infrastructure Improvements (as described in the Development Agreement); provided, however, the permitting associated with each Planning Area would be subject to the completion of the Public Infrastructure Improvements, as required by the Development Agreement (as amended by the Operating Memoranda) and the Specific Plan. Each Owner's compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreement would be determined on a case-by-case basis, based solely on the compliance of each separate Owner and such Owner's Planning Areas with the requirements of the Development Agreement. No Owner would be deemed to have assumed the obligations of Ashby as a master developer under the Development Agreement, but each would still be obligated to comply with the requirements for completion of the Public Improvements required by the Development Agreement and Specific Plan prior to obtaining building permits for their respective Planning Areas. b. The Phase I Neighborhood Park would not be a requirement or expense to be borne by the RVR Parties. The Operating Memoranda would confirm that HRA and Sunwood have agreed to partially assign to the Constructing Party their respective rights to Park DIF Reimbursements, up to an aggregate amount of Six Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($625,000.00). 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal -5- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 c. All remaining funds available to the CFD would be prioritized for the completion of public improvements in a manner oriented toward accelerating the issuance of building permits for the Pan Tracts subject to reimbursement of traffic signal costs for [ ], and with no changes to current plans for completion of Murrieta Hot Springs and Butterfield Roads that would limit, affect or prevent any Panhandle Tract Owner's ability to obtain building or occupancy permits. d. Changes in Phase II thresholds or any amendments to the Pan Tracts portion of the Specific Plan would not require approval from Panhandle Tract Owners as long as such changes would not adversely impact the Panhandle Tract Owners. e. Such additional terms that would provide for the completion of such public improvements as are necessary to support the residential and commercial uses in the various areas prior to the issuance of building permits for those uses. f. Such additional terms that would continue to provide for the implementation of the City's obligations under the agreements for the issuance of the Bonds and for the protection of the Bonds and the rights of the Bondholders. g. Such additional terms as are necessary to provide for the maintenance of the public and private improvements by a homeowner association or associations. (ii) RI -3, HRA and Sunwood hereby declare their support for the adoption of an Operating Memorandum or, if necessary an amendment to the Development Agreement, reflecting such terms, provided that the actual Operating Memorandum or Development Agreement amendment does not impose additional obligations or conditions to development of the Panhandle Tracts or otherwise adversely affect the timing or cost of development of the Panhandle Tracts. In this regard, RI -3, HRA and Sunwood acknowledge that terms in the Operating Memorandum will not be construed as having such an adverse effect merely because they enhance the RVR Planning Areas' chances for advanced entitlement processing and prioritization of CFD financing as contemplated above RI -3, HRA and Sunwood also declare their willingness, subject to the same condition as in the preceding sentence, to join in one or more Operating Memoranda whose purpose is to evidence the partial assignment of Park DIF Reimbursements as set forth above 3 Attorneys' Fees. If any motion or other legal action is instituted to interpret or enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. 4 Discretionary Decisions. The Parties hereby agree and acknowledge that (i) the execution of this Memorandum shall not divest the City of its authority to exercise its discretion with respect to the proposed Operating Memorandum, (ii) the implementation of one or more of the matters described in Paragraph 2(i) above, may require an amendment to the Development Agreement and execution of this 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal -6- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 Memorandum shall not divest the City of its authority to exercise its discretion with respect to any such amendment, (iii) the implementation of one or more of the matters described in Paragraph 2(i) above may require the joinder of one or more third parties to the extent such implementation would impose additional obligations or conditions on or adversely affect the rights of such owners, and (iv) any discretionary land use entitlements referred to in this Memorandum shall require compliance with certain legal procedures, regulations, public hearings and compliance with various applicable laws, including, the California Environmental Quality Act and City Ordinances. Nothing in this Memorandum shall constitute or be construed to constitute a commitment by or a requirement of the City to approve any discretionary land use entitlements referred to in this Memorandum. 5 Governing Law. This Agreement has been negotiated and entered into in the State of California, and shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of California. 6 Severability. If any material covenant, condition or provision herein contained is held to be invalid, void or unenforceable by a final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, the invalid, void, or unenforceable provision shall become void. 7 Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties and their respective heirs, representatives, executors, administrators, successors, insurers and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each and all of those released, and to their heirs, representatives, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. 8 Integration; Entire Agreement; Amendments. No Party has made any warranty or representation to another Party as an inducement to enter into this Agreement or otherwise, which is not set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties hereto pertaining to the limited obligations of the parties to this Memorandum of Understanding, fully supersedes any and all prior oral understandings, representations, warranties and agreements between the Parties hereto, or any of them, or their predecessors in interest, or any of them, pertaining to the limited obligations of the parties to this Memorandum of Understanding. No written agreement between the Parties here to, or any of them, or their predecessors in interest, or any of them, concerning the Project, including but not limited to, the Development Agreement, each amendment to the Development Agreement, the Operating Memoranda entered into pursuant to Section 3.5.5 of the Development Agreement, the agreements implementing the terms of the Development Agreement, and agreements, bonds, Releases and other documents concerning the Bonds shall be in any way amended, altered or otherwise modified by this Memorandum of Understanding. The Parties have not relied upon any promises, warranties or undertakings other than those expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement signed by all of the Parties hereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, as between the RVR Parties and RI -3, HRA and Sunwood, nothing herein shall be deemed to modify or affect the rights and obligations of RI -3 or any RVR Party under the agreement that implements the Settlement ("Settlement Agreement") and the 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal -7- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 other agreements and instruments delivered pursuant thereto, to which the City is not party. Additionally, nothing herein shall limit, modify or otherwise affect the rights and obligations of any Panhandle Tract Owners under the Fifth and Sixth Operating Memoranda, or limit or suspend issuance of building or occupancy permits that would otherwise be issuable under the Fifth and/or Sixth Operating Memoranda. 9 Independent Advice of Counsel. The Parties hereto, and each of them, represent and declare that in executing this Agreement they rely solely upon their own judgment, belief and knowledge, and the advice and recommendations of their own independently selected counsel, concerning the nature, extent and duration of their rights and claims, and that they have not been influenced to any extent whatsoever in executing the same by any of the Parties hereto or by any person representing them, or any of them. 10 Voluntary Agreement. The Parties hereto, and each of them, further represent and declare that they have carefully read this Agreement and know the contents thereof, and that they sign the same freely and voluntarily. 11 Notice to Parties. Written notices, demands and communications among the Parties, shall be sufficiently given by either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service such as, but not limited to, FedEx, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal To RI -3: Roripaugh Investors III, LLC 9740 Apaloosa Road, Suite 230 San Diego, California 92131 Attention: Don Faye and Don Knox Telephone: (619) 573-1806 Facsimile: (619) 573-1808 With a copy to: Roripaugh Investors III, LLC Attention: Mr. James H. Hunter 1025 S. Bridgeway Place, Suite 290 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Telephone: (208) 484-6401 Facsimile: (208) 577-5510 And to David Bagley, Esq. Hecht Solberg Robinson Goldberg & Bagley LLP 600 West Broadway, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 239-3444 Facsimile: (619) 232-6828 -8- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 To AMT Parties: AMT CADC Venture, LLC Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1550 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attention: Ken Kraemer Telephone: (949) 255-2680 Facsimile: With a copy to: R. Michael Joyce, Esq. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 1900 Main Street, 5th Floor Irvine, California 92614-7321 Phone: (949) 553-1313 Facsimile: (949) 553-8354 To HRA1 and HRA Roripaugh 1, LLC HRA2: HRA Roripaugh 2, LLC 12340 El Camino Real, Suite 250 San Diego, California 92130 Attention: Mr. Eliot Peters Telephone: (858) 704-3282 Facsimile: (858) 704-3201 With a copy to: HRA Roripaugh 1, LLC HRA Roripaugh 2, LLC Attention: Mr. James H. Hunter 1025 S. Bridgeway Place, Suite 290 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Telephone: (208) 484-6401 Facsimile: (208) 577-5510 To Sunwood: 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal Sunwood Roripaugh Ranch LLC 9740 Apaloosa Road, Suite 230 San Diego, California 92131 Attention: Mr. Donald R. Faye Telephone: (619) 573-1806 Facsimile: (619) 573-1808 -9- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 To City of Temecula: 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal To RI -3: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Post Office Box 9033 Temecula California 92589 Attention: City Manager Telephone: (951) 694-6444 Facsimile: (951) Roripaugh Investors III, LLC 9740 Apaloosa Road, Suite 230 San Diego, California 92131 Attention: Don Faye and Don Knox Telephone: (619) 573-1806 Facsimile: (619) 573-1808 With a copy to: Roripaugh Investors III, LLC Attention: Mr. James H. Hunter 1025 S. Bridgeway Place, Suite 290 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Telephone: (208) 484-6401 Facsimile: (208) 577-5510 And to David Bagley, Esq. Hecht Solberg Robinson Goldberg & Bagley LLP 600 West Broadway, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 239-3444 Facsimile: (619) 232-6828 To AMT Parties: AMT CADC Venture, LLC Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1550 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attention: Ken Kraemer Telephone: (949) 255-2680 Facsimile: With a copy to: R. Michael Joyce, Esq. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 1900 Main Street, 5th Floor Irvine, California 92614-7321 Phone: (949) 553-1313 Facsimile: (949) 553-8354 -10- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 To HRA1 and HRA Roripaugh 1, LLC HRA2: HRA Roripaugh 2, LLC 12340 El Camino Real, Suite 250 San Diego, California 92130 Attention: Mr. Eliot Peters Telephone: (858) 704-3282 Facsimile: (858) 704-3201 With a copy to: HRA Roripaugh 1, LLC HRA Roripaugh 2, LLC Attention: Mr. James H. Hunter 1025 S. Bridgeway Place, Suite 290 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Telephone: (208) 484-6401 Facsimile: (208) 577-5510 With a copy to: Peter M. Thorson, Esq. Richards, Watson & Gershon 355 South Grand Ave., 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 626-8484 Facsimile: (213) 626-0078 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Understanding as of the day and year first above written. RI -3: RORIPAUGH INVESTORS III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By Jim Hunter, Manager RVR: RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By Its 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal -11- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 RVR PARK: RORIPAUGH VALLEY NEIGHBORHOOD PARK, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By Its HRA: HRA RORIPAUGH 1 LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal By: HRA RORIPAUGH HOLDING COMPANY I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Its: Manager By: HRA RORIPAUGH MANAGEMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Its: Manager By By Joel L. Reed, its Member James J. Zehentbauer, its Member By: HUNTER RA LLC, an limited liability company Its: Manager By: Name: Title: HRA RORIPAUGH 2 LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company By: HRA RORIPAUGH HOLDING COMPANY I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Its: Manager By: HRA RORIPAUGH MANAGEMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Its: Manager By Joel L. Reed, its Member -12- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 By James J. Zehentbauer, its Member By: HUNTER RA LLC, an limited liability company Its: Manager By: Name: Title: Sunwood: SUNWOOD RORIPAUGH RANCH LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 958260.03100 372235-00002/7-31-121nnjlpal BY: SUNWOOD AND ASSOCIATES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its Manager By Its By Its -13- AMLGMN Comments 7/31/2012 CITY CITY OF TEMECULA 958260.03/OC 372235-00002/7-31-12/rmj/pal Chuck Washington Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney DB -14- EXHIBIT "A" RI -3 Comments 7-19-2012 Roripaugh Ranch Ownership Map ilia • ••i• • -141/6 . iii AJ -11.11 Aii.., i., - a if • Al 4 el • • d� u s g a s r .`a_ o a ffai § E Vt aeB U-nlig Y =_ "-iay6 vc 'amu 9 TO 3'E vo y mo c a• 3 8 3u° -c p�•r, as n I A• m: E 8 y`, 38 - 4 1 wri 0 Q • 3 al elf T 1 co 0 R1-3 Comments 7-19-2012 958260 03/0C EXHIBIT "A" :72235-00002/7.3 I-129-au/pal -I- • Item No. 7 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager 07 -e -r - CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2012-13 Economic Development Operating Agreement with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce PREPARED BY: Christine Damko, Economic Development Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Operating Agreement for Fiscal Year 2012-13 with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $135,000. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula partners with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce (TVCC) in order to enhance the City's economic development efforts. The Economic Development Committee consisting of Mayor Washington and Council Member Roberts met with staff met to discuss the Economic Development funding requests on March 22, 2012. The Committee recommended approval of $135,000 and the City Council subsequently approved this funding level in the Fiscal Year 2012-13 Operating Budget. Exhibit "A" to the attached agreement outlines services to be provided during the 2012-2013 Fiscal Year, to carry on promotional activities on behalf of the City of Temecula. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce The mission of the TVCC is to promote positive economic growth for the business community, by doing so, support the programs which preserve and improve the quality of life for the entire community. The TVCC provides access to a complete list of members who have the expertise needed to assist member businesses and the community to manage their financial, organizational and marketing issues. The TVCC's efficient, friendly and energetic staff responds to a vast range of requests for information. In 2011, the TVCC responded to over 27,800 requests for relocation, tourism, and business information via phone, walk-in, email, and mail. The TVCC continues to assist legitimate firms seeking to relocate to Temecula and provide them with exceptional customer service. In addition, the TVCC's CEO works in conjunction with City staff and Southwest Economic Development Corporation (SWEDC), participating in site visits to large businesses throughout the year. The Chamber's CEO periodically acts as the liaison between the business community and City/Utility companies related to specific issues facing the business. This service provides a positive benefit for the economic development of the business community. The TVCC currently coordinates over 200 events, programs and opportunities each year for members to network and connect with other local businesses. The TVCC partners with the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) to offer business counseling services and on a monthly basis provides Small Business Training Workshops, offering information on key business issues such as employer taxes, opportunities for doing business with the Government and SBA loans. The TVCC is also a strong partner in the Temecula Valley Entrepreneur's Exchange, and as part of this agreement the TVCC is providing one year trial memberships to a maximum of sixteen start-up companies who will locate within the City's incubator. The Chamber also provides meeting space to many local non-profit organizations (at no charge ex: SAFE, The Arts Council, Dorland Mountain Arts Colony, Race For Humanity, Temecula Noon Rotary, and SCORE representatives) who offer counseling services to individuals starting businesses and businesses wishing to expand. With 46 years of experience, the TVCC offers its members and the community at large unprecedented benefits, events, programs, discounts and opportunities, coordinated to help them succeed. The TVCC serves as an advocate for business, dedicated to regional prosperity. Through these cooperative efforts the TVCC can accomplish collectively what no one business could do individually. The TVCC represents the voice of business, taking positions on local issues based upon our mission statement, access to sources of information and input from stakeholders. By taking a leadership role on key issues, the TVCC becomes the focal point and can direct its resources as well as alliance partners to address the issues. The TVCC board of directors is comprised of 23 respected business owners and members, each representing a key business segment of this area. The TVCC's request in the Operating Budget. FISCAL IMPACT: Commerce is available Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: amount of $135,000 was budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2012-13 Appropriate funding for the Temecula Valley Chamber of in the Fiscal Year 2012-13 Economic Development Department Fiscal Year 2012-13 Operating Agreement OPERATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE This Agreement is made and effective as of this 14th day of August, 2012, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA ("City"), and TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ("CHAMBER"), a California nonprofit corporation. In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a business, industrial, tourist and resident center; disseminating information relative thereto, and of properly following up and giving consideration to inquiries made relative to the various activities of City of Temecula ("City) and its possibilities as such to residential, industrial, tourist and business interests. b. The CHAMBER has special knowledge, experience and facilities for disseminating information; and is organized for and equipped to carry on promotional activities on behalf of City; and to publicize and exploit its advantages. c. Such activities are recognized by law as being in the public interest and serving public purpose. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2012, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2013, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. SERVICES CHAMBER shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. CHAMBER shall complete the tasks according to the Schedule of Events which is also set forth in Exhibit B. 4. PERFORMANCE CHAMBER shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. CHAMBER shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of CHAMBER hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay quarterly, in accordance with the payment rate and term and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit C, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spend on the services. Any terms in Exhibit C other than the payment rate and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One Hundred Thirty -Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($135,000) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. CHAMBER shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. CHAMBER shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and CHAMBER at the time City's written authorization is given to CHAMBER for the performance of said services. c. CHAMBER will submit invoices quarterly for actual services performed. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice. 6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to CHAMBER the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the CHAMBER will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 5. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The CHAMBER's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that CHAMBER is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating CHAMBER for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the CHAMBER. If such failure by the CHAMBER to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the CHAMBER's control, and without fault or negligence of the CHAMBER, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the CHAMBER is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the CHAMBER with written notice of the default. The CHAMBER shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the CHAMBER fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. CHAMBER shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. CHAMBER shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. CHAMBER shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the CHAMBER. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, CHAMBER shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 9. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 10. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by July 1, 2012 its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this projectilocation or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall riot be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. CHAMBER is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of CHAMBER shall at all times be under CHAMBER's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of CHAMBER or any of CHAMBER's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. CHAMBER shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. CHAMBER shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to CHAMBER in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to CHAMBER as provided in the Agreement, City shall riot pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to CHAMBER for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to CHAMBER for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The CHAMBER shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any mariner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The CHAMBER shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall riot be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the CHAMBER to comply with this section. 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by CHAMBER in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by CHAMBER without City's prior written authorization. CHAMBER, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided CHAMBER gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. CHAMBER shall promptly notify City should CHAMBER, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent CHAMBER and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. CHAMBER agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by CHAMBER. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 14. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City via U.S. Mail: To Consultant: City of Temecula Mailing Address: 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 Attention: Christine Damko Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce 26790 Ynez Court, Suite A Temecula, CA 92591 Attention: Alice Sullivan, President/CEO 15. ASSIGNMENT The CHAMBER shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, CHAMBER's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the CHAMBER. 16. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, CHAMBER shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 17. GOVERNING LAW The City and CHAMBER understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Courts judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub- contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of CHAMBER warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the CHAMBER and has the authority to bind CHAMBER to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Chuck Washington, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 26790 Ynez Court, Suite A Temecula, CA 92591 (951) 676-5090 DB By: Name: Isaac Lizarraga Title: Chairman of the Board By: Name: Alice Sullivan, IOM Title: President/CEO By: Name: Janet Scott Title: Secretary By: Name: Jerry Konchar Title: Treasurer EXHIBIT "A" SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce shall undertake, during the 2012-13 Fiscal Year, to carry on promotional activities on behalf of the City of Temecula and to particularly render the following services: 1. Business Retention site visits - (2 per month: schedule and attend) 2. Business Relocation assistance (average 30 businesses/year) 3. Tourism inquiry fulfillment (10,500 inquiries) 4. Residential and business relocation inquiry fulfillment (4,600 inquiries) 5. Demographic information inquiry fulfillment (4,200 inquiries) 6. SCORE — Weekly meeting space for counseling services 7. SBDC — Bi -weekly meeting space for counseling services 8. SBDC — Nine Workshops (QuickBooks, Marketing, Business start-up, HR) 9. Promotion of Shop Local program 10. Maintain website promoting local commerce, tourism and events 11. Street Map (Production and distribution) 12. Business Resource/Relocation Guide (Production and distribution, Print & Online) 13. Business Workshops on behalf of City of Temecula Topics to include: Signage, Business Licenses, TUP (Held quarterly) 14. Promotion of City events (Job Expo, College & Career Fair) 15. Legislative Advocacy (Consultant fee, maintain website, staff participation) 16. Candidate forums (City and County offices) 17. Temecula Today — full Page Article (6 per year, distribution of 1,400 copies) 18. Restaurant Month promotions 19. Student of the Month/Year 20. Ribbon Cuttings/Grand Opening Events (48 per year) 21. Valley Young Professionals 22. Chamber Networking Events - See Exhibit B, Schedule of events 23. Introductory one year memberships for incubator businesses (16 @ $325/each) 24. RTA Bus pass sales outlet 25. Provide conference room space to local non-profit organizations 26. Community -wide E -Waste events (2 per year) 27. Community Travel programs 28. City participation at Chamber special events: Awards Gala (Event partner - 10 seats) State of the City (Event partner - 30 seats) Economic Forecast (Event partner - 10 seats) Wine Country Classic (Event partner — 5 Reservations) Legislative Summit (Event partner - 10 seats) Women In Business EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF EVENTS TEMECULA VALLEY CHVIBER F COMMERCE "LEADING THE WAY` 2012 TVCC Event Dates Mixers 5:30-7:30pm Wednesday, January 18, 2012 - Barley & Hops Olde World Family Tavern Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - Provident Bank Wednesday, March 21, 2012 - Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac Wednesday, April 18, 2012 - Murrieta Day Spa Wednesday, May 16, 2012 - RKR Marketing & Advertising Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - Thornton Winery Wednesday, July 18, 2012 - Wright Management Services Wednesday, August 15, 2012 - Amante & Associates Wednesday, September 19, 2012 - Monte Carlo Extravaganza Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - Business Expo Wednesday, November 14, 2012 - TBD Wednesday, December 12, 2012 - Member Appreciation Night Industry Networking 8-9:30am (Temecula Chamber of Commerce) Tuesday, January 31, 2012 - Home Buying, Housing, and Real Estate More to come Membership Committee Meeting 8:00-9:OOam (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Wednesday, January 11, 2012 Wednesday, February 8, 2012 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Wednesday, May 9, 2012 Wednesday, June 13, 2012 Advocacy Meeting 9:00-10:OOam (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Wednesday, January 11, 2012 Wednesday, February 8, 2012 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Wednesday, May 9, 2012 Wednesday, June 13, 2012 Networking Breakfast 7:30-9:15am (B] Wednesday, January 25, 2012 Wednesday, February 22, 2012 Wednesday, March 28, 2012 Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, 's Restaurant) Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, July 11, 2012 August 8, 2012 September 12, 2012 October 10, 2012 November 14, 2012 December 12, 2012 July 11, 2012 August 8, 2012 September 12, 2012 October 10, 2012 November 14, 2012 December 12, 2012 July 25, 2012 August 22, 2012 September 26, 2012 Wednesday, April 25, 2012 Wednesday, May 23, 2012 Wednesday, June 27, 2012 Wednesday, October 24, 2012 November -DARK December -DARK Coffee Connection 8:00-9:30am (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Friday, January 6, 2012 Friday, February 3, 2012 Friday, March 2, 2012 Friday, April 6, 2012 Friday, May 4, 2012 Friday, June 1, 2012 Friday, July 6, 2012 Friday, August 3, 2012 Friday, September 7, 2012 Friday, October 5, 2012 Friday, November 2, 2012 Friday, December 7, 2012 New Member Reception 4:00-5:30pm (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Thursday, February 2, 2012 Thursday, April 5, 2012 Thursday, June 7, 2012 Thursday, August 2, 2012 Thursday, October 4, 2012 Thursday, December 6, 2012 Ambassador Luncheons 11:30-1:OOpm (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Tuesday, February 28, 2011 Tuesday, May 22, 2011 Tuesday, September 25, 2011 Thursday, December 13, 2011 Ambassador Training 9:00-10:OOam (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) (Training dates may be added as needed) Thursday, February 2, 2012 Thursday, April 5, 2012 Thursday, June 7, 2012 Thursday, August 2, 2012 Thursday, October 4, 2012 Thursday, December 6, 2012 Power Networking Workshop 12:00-1:30pm (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Tuesday, February 7, 2012 Tuesday, May 1, 2012 Tuesday, August 7, 2012 Tuesday, November 6, 2012 SBDC Seminars (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Wednesday, February 1, 2012 -"Get the Tax Facts" 9:OOam - 3:OOpm Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - "How to Start Your Small Business" 9:OOam - 11:OOam Wednesday, April 4, 2012 - "QuickBooks for Beginners" 9:OOam - 11:OOam Tuesday, June 6, 2012 - "The Science of Buying a Franchise" 9:OOam - 12:00noon Tuesday, August 13, 2012 - "How to Start Your Small Business" 9:OOam - 11:OOam Wednesday, August 24, 2012 - "Marketing Your SmaII Business" 9:OOam - 12:00noon Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - "How to Start Your SmaII Business" 9:OOam - 11:OOam Wednesday, September 5, 2012 - "Marketing Your Small Business" 9:OOam - 11:OOam SBDC Seminars (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) 12 - 1:30pm Tuesday, April 10, 2012- Small Business Development Center "HR Overview for Office Managers and Owners" Tuesday, July 10, 2012- SmaII Business Development Center "How to Speak Like a Leader" Tuesday, September 11, 2012- Small Business Development Center "Incorporating Your SmaII Business" Tuesday, November 13, 2012- SmaII Business Development Center "Dealing with Difficult Employees" Business Success Forum 12:00-1:30pm (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Tuesday, January 10, 2012- John Dubots, Capital Management, "Retirement Dream Building; Understanding your retirement options as a business owner or sole proprietor" Tuesday, February 14, 2012- Jason DeArmond, J. DeArmond Design, "Branding Your Business" Tuesday, March 13, 2012- Kaelan Sutherland, Sutherland Networks, "Telecommunications" Professional Development Series 9:00-11:OOam (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Friday, January 27, 2012 - Marketing (1) Friday, February 10, 2012 - Marketing (2) Friday, February 24, 2012 - Marketing (3) Friday, March 9, 2012 - Marketing (4) Friday, April 13, 2012 - Leadership (1) Friday, April 27, 2012 - Leadership (2) Friday, May 11, 2012 - Leadership (3) Friday, May 25, 2012 - Leadership (4) Friday, July 13, 2012 - Sales (1) Friday, July 27, 2012 - Sales (2) Friday, August 10, 2012 - Sales (3) Friday, August 24, 2012 - Sales (4) Friday, October 12, 2012 - QuickBooks (1) Friday, October 26, 2012 - QuickBooks (2) Friday, November 9, 2012 - QuickBooks (3) Friday, November 16, 2012 - QuickBooks (4) Valley Young Professionals VYP Planning Committee Meetings Commerce) Thursday, January 5, 2012 Thursday, February 2, 2012 Thursday, March 1, 2012 Thursday, April 5, 2012 Thursday, May 3, 2012 Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:00-9:OOam (Temecula Valley Chamber of Thursday, July 5, 2012 Thursday, August 2, 2012 Thursday, September 6, 2012 Thursday, October 4, 2012 Thursday, November 1, 2012 Thursday, December 6, 2012 VYP Civic Committee Meetings 12:OOpm-1:OOpm (Commerce Bank of Murrieta) Monday January 23 Monday February 27 Monday March 26 Monday April 23 Monday May 28 Monday July 23 Monday August 27 Monday September 24 Monday October 22 Monday November 26 Monday June 25 Monday December none VYP Education Committee Meeting 8:00-9:OOam (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Tuesday January 10 Tuesday July 10 Tuesday February 7 Tuesday August 7 Tuesday March 6 Tuesday September 11 Tuesday April 10 Tuesday October 9 Tuesday May 8 Tuesday November 6 Tuesday June 12 Tuesday December 11 VYP Event Committee Meeting 9:30-10:30pm (E.A.T. Market Place) Thursday January 12 Thursday July 12 Thursday February 9 Thursday August 9 Thursday March 8 Thursday September 13 Thursday April 12 Thursday October 11 Thursday May 10 Thursday November 9 Thursday June 14 Thursday December 13 VYP Hospitality Committee Meeting 10:00 — 11:OOam @ Sunset One Escrow Monday January 10 Monday July 16 Monday February 20 Monday August 20 Monday March 19 Monday September 17 Monday April 16 Monday October 15 Monday May 21 Monday November 19 Monday June 18 Monday December 17 VYPER 6:00-8:OOpm Thursday, February 23, 2012 Thursday, April 26, 2012 Thursday, June 28, 2012 Thursday, August 23, 2012 - Thursday, October 25, 2012 — Location TBD Thursday, December 20, 2012 — Member Appreciation Night Speed Networking 11:30am-1:OOpm (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Wednesday, January 11, 2012 Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Wednesday, September 12, 2012 Wednesday, November 14, 2012 Lunch & Learn 12:OOam-1:30pm (Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce) Wednesday, March 7, 2012, Speaker: Bill Wilson, Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Speaker: John Dubots Wednesday, July 18, 2012, Speaker: Think Tank 6:OOpm-8:OOpm Tuesday, March 27, 2012, Book: "Onward", by Howard Schultz Tuesday, June 19, 2012, Book: Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Book: Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Book: (Smaller Book) Special Events: Awards Gala- Saturday, February 18, 2012, 5:30 -Midnight @ Pechanga Resort and Casino State of the City Address - Thursday, April 26, 2012, 7:30-10:30am @ City of Temecula Civic Center Business & Economic Forecast— May 31, 2012, South Coast Winery Resort & Spa Chamber Golf Classic - Friday, June 22, 2012, 10:OOam-6:OOpm @ Temecula Creek Inn Wine & Bingo — Friday July 13, 2012, Wilson Creek Winery Monte Carlo Mixer — Sept 19, 2012, Wilson Creek Winery Legislative Summit— September 20, 2012, South Coast winery Resort & Spa Business & Health Expo - Wednesday, October 17, 2012, 5:00-8:00 pm, location TBD Women in Business -Sept. 12, 2012 at South Coast Winery Resort & Spa Southwest California Legislative Council Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors, 26529 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula Monday, January 23, 2012 Monday, February, 27, 2012 Monday, March 26, 2012 Monday, April 23, 2012 Monday, June 25, 2012 Monday, July 23, 2012 Monday, August 27, 2012 Monday, September 24, 2012 Monday, October 22, 2012 Monday, November 26, 2012 (Planning Retreat — Closed Meeting) December - Dark EXHIBIT "C" PAYMENT RATE AND SCHEDULE That in consideration of the promotional activities and services performed by the CHAMBER for the City of Temecula, as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, City hereby agrees to pay CHAMBER, during the term of this Agreement, the sum of One Hundred Thirty -Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($135,000) for the Fiscal Year 2012-13. The sum of $135,000 for the fiscal year 2012-13, is payable upon receipt of invoice quarterly beginning on execution of the Agreement. Item No. 8 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager 07 -e -r- 110 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Bob Johnson, City Manager DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Agreement for funding the acquisition of open space property (APN 940-140-011) between Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority and the City of Temecula PREPARED BY: Theresa Harris, Development Processing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING THE ACQUISITION OF OPEN SPACE PROPERTY BETWEEN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AND CITY OF TEMECULA" (APN 940-140-011) 2. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to issue a warrant for the sum of $135,000 to be deposited in an escrow account, to complete the transaction. BACKGROUND: Anthony T. Carr is the owner of a 4.76 acre parcel located on Via Horca. The property was appraised in June 2012 by an agent for $135,000. Temecula's Escarpment Strategies Report, prepared in 2009 by the Riverside Land Conservancy, recommends acquisition of this highly visible parcel. The Western Riverside County Conservation Authority (RCA) has agreed to serve as the City's agent. The RCA will be responsible for closing costs and they have agreed to accept and maintain the property as open space in perpetuity. No matching grants are available at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: The 2012-13 Capital Improvement Open Space Acquisition Program has earmarked $510,163 for open space acquisition. Funds are available in the Development Impact Fee Open Space Account. The land was appraised in June 2012 for $135,000. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Funding Agreement 3. Map of Carr Property 4. Map of previously acquired properties RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING THE ACQUISITION OF OPEN SPACE PROPERTY BETWEEN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AND CITY OF TEMECULA" (APN 940-140-011) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ("RCA") has entered into that certain agreement dated as of September 10, 2012, entitled "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property with Escrow Instructions" with Anthony T. Carr ("Purchase Agreement") for the purchase of approximately 4.76 acres of land west of the City of Temecula (the "Property") as identified on Exhibit A, Legal Description, of the Purchase Agreement A. RCA will dedicate the Property to open space uses with public trails. B. The Property is located outside the City boundaries, but within the City's Sphere of Influence. C. The Property is located outside of the City boundaries, but within the City's Sphere of Influence. D. Acquisition of the Property and its dedication to open space and trail purposes will provide substantial value to the City of Temecula. The Property is a prominent natural feature dominating the western viewscape for the City in the areas known as the "Escarpment." Use of the Property for these purposes fulfills the goals and policies of the Open Space/Conservation Element of the General Plan for the City of Temecula and particularly the following: Goal 3, conservation of important biological habitats and protection of plant and animal species of concern, wildlife movement corridors, and general biodiversity; Goal 5, conservation of open space areas for a balance of recreation, scenic enjoyment, and protection of natural resources and features; Policy 5.1, conserve the western escarpment and southern ridgelines, the Santa Margarita River, slopes in Sphere of Influence; and Goal 8, development of a trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs. E. Acquisition of the Property by RCA with the contribution from the City and the dedication of the Property to open space and trail purposes is consistent with the City's General Plan and each element thereof. F. The City Council has duly considered all terms and conditions of this Agreement and finds and determines that the Agreement is in the best interests of the City and the health, safety, and welfare of their residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements. Section 2. Approval of Funding Agreement. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain agreement entitled "AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING THE ACQUISITION OF OPEN SPACE PROPERTY BETWEEN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AND CITY OF TEMECULA" (the "Agreement"), with such changes in the Agreement as may be mutually agreed upon by the RCA and City Manager as are in substantial conformance with the form of such Agreement on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement, on behalf of the City. A copy of the final Agreement when executed by the Mayor shall be placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Section 3. City Manager's Authority. The City Manager (or his designee), is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to take all actions necessary and convenient to carry out and implement the Agreement, and to administer the City's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be performed under the said Agreement including, but not limited to, approval and execution on behalf of the City of the such escrow instructions, escrow agreements, implementing agreements, acceptances, certificates, estoppel letters, implementing agreements and other similar agreements and documents as contemplated by or described in the Agreement or as necessary and convenient to implement the Agreement. Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of August, 2012. Chuck Washington, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 12- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of August, 2012, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING THE ACQUISITION OF OPEN SPACE PROPERTY BETWEEN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AND CITY OF TEMECULA (ANTHONY T. CARR PROPERTY) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority, a public agency and joint powers authority ("RCA") and the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and shall be dated as of August 14, 2012. In consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: I. Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each party finds and determines to be true and correct: A. RCA is a joint powers authority, of which the City is a member agency, that was formed to implement the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP"), a multi jurisdictional habitat conservation plan focusing on the conservation of both sensitive species and associated habitats to address biological and ecological diversity conservation needs in western Riverside County, and setting aside significant areas of undisturbed land for the conservation of sensitive habitat while preserving open space and recreational opportunities. B. RCA has negotiated the terms of that certain agreement entitled "AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY WITH ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" with Anthony T. Carr dated September 10, 2012 ("Purchase Agreement") for the purchase of approximately 4.76 acres of real property located in the unincorporated area of Riverside County and abutting the City of Temecula, Assessor's Parcel Number 940-140-011 (the "Property") more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. C. RCA will designate the Property as Additional Reserve Lands pursuant to the MSHCP. (1 MSHCP, §§ 3.2.1 & 3.2.2; Implementing Agreement, §§ 3.3 & 3.72, p. 4.) D. The Property is located outside of the City boundaries, but within the City's Sphere of Influence. E. Acquisition of the Property and its dedication to open space and trail purposes will provide substantial value to the City of Temecula. The Property is a prominent natural feature dominating the western viewscape for the City in the areas known as the "Escarpment." Use of the Property for these purposes fulfills the goals and policies of the Open Space/Conservation Element of the General Plan for the City of Temecula and particularly the following: Goal 3, conservation of important biological habitats and protection of plant and animal species of concern, wildlife movement corridors, and general biodiversity; Goal 5, conservation of open space areas for a balance of recreation, scenic enjoyment, and protection of natural resources and features; Policy 5.1, conserve the western escarpment and southern 26493.00297\7515081.1 ridgelines, the Santa Margarita River, slopes in Sphere of Influence; and Goal 8, development of a trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs. F. City desires to assist the RCA in funding the purchase of the Property. G. Acquisition of the Property by RCA with the contribution from the City and the dedication of the Property to open space and trail purposes is consistent with the City's General Plan and each element thereof. H. The City Council has duly considered all terms and conditions of this Agreement and finds and determines that the Agreement is in the best interests of the City and the health, safety, and welfare of their residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements. II. City Contribution of Funds for Acquisition of Property. A. City shall pay to RCA the sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND Dollars ($135,000) for the purchase price of the Property. B. City shall pay such sum into the escrow for the purchase of the Property pursuant to the Purchase Agreement ("Escrow") within five (5) business days of notice to the City by RCA that the Escrow is ready to close. RCA's notice to the City shall provide directions for the wiring of the City funds to Escrow. C. Within five (5) business days of the close of Escrow, RCA shall provide City with a copy of the Grant Deed and a closing statement. III. RCA to Dedicate Property to Open Space and Trail Uses. A. As soon as practical, but not later than three (3) months from the date of the close of Escrow, RCA shall record a restrictive covenant, or another similar document, as determined by the RCA, to dedicate the Property to open space and trail uses that would be consistent with the MSHCP. B. City shall be a third party beneficiary to such restrictive covenant or similar document with the right to enforce its provisions. C. City shall consent to such restrictive covenant or similar document prior to its recordation, provided such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. IV. Establishment of a Trail System on Property. A. City may use its reasonable efforts to establish a trail system on the Property for pedestrians and equestrians, consistent with the MSHCP. RCA agrees to work with the City to assure the trail system's consistency with the MSHCP. B. City agrees to pay for all costs associated with and undertake all other actions necessary in constructing and maintaining any trail system that may be developed on the 2 26493.00297\7515081.1 Property and agrees to indemnify RCA against any liability, except such liability that may be the result of RCA's negligence. V. Consideration of Annexation of Property into City. A. City may use its reasonable efforts to investigate the feasibility of annexing the Property into the City. RCA shall cooperate in the process to the extent appropriate. B. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to be, nor shall it be construed to be, a commitment on the part of the City to annex the Property into the City. VI. General A. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by written notice to the other party: City: CITY OF TEMECULA PO Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager With a copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon 355 South Grand Ave., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attn: Peter M. Thorson RCA: WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 3403 Tenth Street, Suite 320 P.O. Box 1667 Riverside, CA 92502-1667 Attn: Executive Director With a copy to: Best, Best & Krieger LLP 3390 University Avenue, 5th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Michelle Ouellette B. This Agreement is the result of negotiations between the Parties and is intended by the Parties to be a final expression of their understanding with respect to the matters herein contained. This Agreement supersedes any and all other prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. 3 26493.00297\7515081.1 C. Amendments hereto must be in writing executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and RCA. D. The parties agree that each party has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to have their counsel and real estate advisors review and revise this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. E. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the feminine and masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and "party" include corporation, partnership, firm, trust, or association wherever the context so requires. F. Each person signing below personally warrants and represents to the parties that the party he or she represents has approved this Agreement, intends to be bound by its terms and that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the party they represent. G. The parties acknowledge that time is of the essence in this Agreement. H. If any term or provision of this Agreement shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. I. A waiver or breach of covenant or provision in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any other covenant or provision in this Agreement, and no waiver shall be valid unless in writing and executed by the waiving party. An extension of time for performance of any obligation or act shall not be deemed an extension of the time for the performance of any other obligation or act. J. Each party acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement is valid, binding and enforceable against the party. K. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts. Each shall be deemed an original and all, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. 4 26493.00297\7515081.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, a public agency and a joint powers authority Chuck Washington Mayor Charles V. Landry Executive Director ATTEST: ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC Honey Bernas City Clerk Clerk of the RCA Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson Best Best & Krieger, LLP City Attorney General Counsel 5 26493.00297\7515081.1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Lot 9 of Tract 25980, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 243, Pages 92 to 96, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. Assessor's Parcel Number: 940-140-011-4 Exhibit "A" 26493.00297\7515081.1 33°29'0"N 117°9'0"W Carr Escarpment Property Habitat Management Unit - Santa Ana Mtns Rough Step Unit 5 Area Plan - Southwest Area Sub Unit -SU1 - Murrieta Creek Highways Project Site RCA MSHCP Conserved Lands Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Lands Criteria Cells 0 City 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 Map Prepared - June 27, 2012 Aerial Data - March 2012 2,000 Feet 33°29'0"N *411'9, r1A M EDE1 F'-�s �. �4 RD tor3 L, a„,„„„ rD WM,A 11,1)1441° SEt� "4 Status of Escarpment Properties Pftp Y r 746 btrAt1;. lip A.' • _ .101,c-fil -‘,."-- ok‘ 4 pC Y ip olio," ,3-- 00-- .z x c`s' ^ ‘ III 1010,r• e 1' al oFrar� �t �� ' • 101* FEbIIN'-',2,1��-1 10:11:‘," . TA 111. A , \J "a �i .1,1. ii...., it ....•:., s. MI(#"%G �'1, D.,10=.• � eat � m � �. 15 ri. ro,J • v�reaAY CHUFF. 0-04 54 5 m 9J �i tx� Highways Streets Properties with HANS Protection or Preserved Open Space City of Temecula Joint Riverside Conservation Authority Acquired Properties Visible Properties to Consider for Future Acquisition Murrieta Temecula Parcels H Existing House 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet HANS/ERP data layers were manually created from Riverside County TLMA Land Information System Website (December 20111K. Seal). July 10, 2012 R:Igislarcmap projectslplanning,Escarpment_Properties_11X17_no_buyjd.rtocd Item No. 9 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager 07 -e -r - Al -td r -o CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City -Maintained System within Tract Map No. 24188 PREPARED BY: Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 24188) BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 24188 was recorded by the County Recorder on December 28, 2005. The owner dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes streets designated as lettered lots on the map. The City Clerk accepted the offers of dedication. Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. However, the one-year Warranty Bond and Labor and Materials Bond have not been released. The Warranty Bond will be released at the end of the one-year period in August, 2013. The Labor and Materials Bonds will be released six months into the one-year warranty period in February, 2013. The public streets now being accepted by this action are as follows: Portion of Meadows Parkway, portion of Pauba Road, portion of Sunny Meadows Drive, Nacke Drive, Bradshaw Drive, Dahl Drive, portions of Garcia Way, and Rivera Drive. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 12 - with Exhibits "A — B" inclusive RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 24188) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 24188 was recorded by the County Recorder at December 28, 2005 in which offers of dedication for street and public utility purposes were accepted by the City of Temecula from Cal -Paseo Del Sol, LLC; and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed; and, WHEREAS, Only the Warranty Bond and Labor and Material Bond pertaining to this tract have not been released; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City -Maintained Street System the streets and associated drainage improvements offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of August, 2012. Chuck Washington, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 12- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of August, 2012, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2012 - Accepting certain public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map 24188 into the City - Maintained Street System as described as follows: 1. Lot "A" (portion of Meadows Parkway) of said Tract Map No. 24188 2. Lot "B" (portion of Pauba Road) of said Tract Map No. 24188 3. Lot "C" (portion of Sunny Meadows Drive) of said Tract Map No. 24188 4. Lot "D" (Nacke Drive) of said Tract Map No. 24188 5. Lot "E" (Bradshaw Drive) of said Tract Map No. 24188 6. Lot "F" (Dahl Drive) of said Tract Map No. 24188 7. Lot "G" (portion of Garcia Way) of said Tract Map No. 24188 8. Lot "H" (portion of Garcia Way) of said Tract Map No. 24188 9. Lot "I" (Rivera Drive) of said Tract Map No. 24188 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION No. 2012 - TRACT MAP 24188 71 R. 59 70 X61 n 69 66 67 Item No. 10 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager 07 -e -r - go r, CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Construction Contract for Environmental Mitigation for French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements, PW02-11 PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Engineer — CIP William Becerra, Associate Engineer — CIP RECOMMENDATION: 1. Award the construction contract for Environmental Mitigation for French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements, PW02-11, to Natures Image, Inc. in the amount of $195,559; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $19,555.90, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 3. Make a finding that Environmental Mitigation for French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements, PW02-11 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. BACKGROUND: On February 23, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 10-14 to approve the French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements, PW02-11 and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City, in conjunction with the resource agencies, selected an appropriate mitigation site to implement measures necessary to offset impacts to riparian habitats. The site is located along the northern bank of Temecula Creek, approximately 1/4 mile west of Pechanga Parkway. On June 26, 2012, City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to solicit construction bids. On Tuesday, July 31, 2012, two bids were electronically opened and publicly posted on PlanetBids. The results were as follows: 1. Natures Image Inc. $ 195,559 2. Habitat Restoration Services Inc. $ 229,205 Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found Natures Image Inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. Natures Image Inc. has completed similar work for other cities. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $230,000. The project specifications allow for 20 working days, which is an approximate duration of one calendar month. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is an element of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) to conserve open space, nature preserves and wildlife to be set aside in some areas. It is designed to protect over 150 species and conserve over 500,000 acres in Western Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a permittee to the MSHCP and as such is required to abide by the Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Fee Remittance and Collection Policy adopted by Resolution 07-04 on September 10, 2007. The RCA is a joint regional authority formed by the County and the Cities to provide primary policy direction for implementation of the MSHCP. Beginning July 1, 2008 the RCA required that locally funded Capital Improvement Projects contribute applicable MSHCP fees within 90 -days of construction contract award. Fees outside the public right of way are calculated on a cost per acre of disturbed area basis, while fees for typical right-of-way improvements projects are 5% of construction costs. Projects funded by TUMF or Measure A are exempt from MSHCP fees, as those programs contribute directly to the MSHCP. French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements, Project No. PW02-11 is funded, in part, by TUMF and Measure A and is therefore exempt to the 5% MSHCP fees. FISCAL IMPACT: The French Valley Parkway Interchange Environmental Mitigation Project is budgeted within the City's Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2013-17 and is funded with several sources including Capital Project Reserves, DIF — Streets, Measure A, and TUMF. There are sufficient funds in the project account 210.165.719.5804 for the contract amount of $195,559 plus the 10% contingency amount of $19,555.90 for a total encumbrance of $215,114.90. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract 2. Mitigation Site 3. Project Location 4. Project Description CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT FOR FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY INTERCHANGE — ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROJECT NO. P02-11EM THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of August, 2012 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Natures Image Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY INTERCHANGE — ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION, PROJECT NO. PW02-11EM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard Plans and Specifications, (latest edition), issued by the California Department of Transportation, where specifically referenced in the Plans, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc. (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY INTERCHANGE — ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION, PROJECT NO. PW02-11EM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: BNi Building News Division of BNi Publications, Inc. 1612 South Clementine St. Anaheim, California 92802 (714) 517-0970 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY INTERCHANGE — ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION, PROJECT NO. PW02-11 EM. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY INTERCHANGE — ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROJECT NO. PW02-11 EM All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. 3. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. 4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: One Hundred Ninety Five Thousand Five Hundred Fifty Nine DOLLARS and No CENTS ($ 195,559.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Twenty (20) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6. PAYMENTS A. LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the Director of Public Works a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Director of Public Works may require. This schedule, as approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. B. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. C. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. D. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES — EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. Within ten (10) calendar days of the occurrence of such delay, CONTRACTOR shall give written notice to CITY. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the occurrence of the delay, CONTRACTOR shall provide written documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to CITY. CONTRACTOR'S failure to provide such notice and documentation shall constitute CONTRACTOR'S waiver, discharge, and release of such delay claims against CITY. 8. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 9. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are available from the California Department of Industrial Relations' Internet Web Site at http://www.dir.ca.gov. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $50.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY OF TEMECULA, TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, and/or TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CONTRACTOR. 12. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that none of its partners, members or shareholders are related by blood or marriage to any employee of the CITY who has participated in the development of the specifications or approval of this project or who will administer this project nor are they in any way financially associated with any CITY officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ nor any person with an ownership interest in the CONTRACTOR has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. 16. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 17. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plants of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 18. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 19. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body who has participated in the development of the specifications or approval of this project or will administer this project shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract or the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 21. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Mailing Address: Greg Butler Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Street Address: Greg Butler Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Natures Image Inc. 20361 Hermana Circle Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 680-4400 By: Steven Reinoehl Director of Operations By: Michelle Caruana President (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney By: Chuck Washington, Mayor -' as r/ i IMI A • !.4r FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY / INTERSTATE-15 OVER-CROSSING AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE I Circulation Project Location Aerial Data - March 2010 0 250 500 Feet 1,000 50 2012-13 2016-17 CITY OF TEMECULA Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2013-17 FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY / INTERSTATE -15 OVER -CROSSING AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE I Project Description: This project includes the design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and construction activities to portions of the French Valley Parkway and Interstate 15 over -crossing and interchange. The project will add a new southbound off -ramp from Interstate 15 to French Valley Parkway, construct the northern half of French Valley Parkway from the off -ramp to Jefferson Avenue, widen the existing southbound off -ramp from Interstate 15 to Winchester, and construct a new auxiliary lane between French Valley Parkway and the Winchester Road southbound off -ramp. Other features include permanent and temporary retaining walls, erosion control and irrigation, and a new traffic signal and roadway improvements at the intersection of French Valley Parkway and Jefferson Avenue. The project requires oversight by Caltrans and coordination with the City of Murrieta. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by providing another southbound off -ramp from Interstate 15 and adds a lane to the Interstate 15 southbound off -ramp to Winchester. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Protect Status: Construction is estimated to be completed by December 2013. Department: Public Works -Account No. 210.165.719 Level: I Project Cost: Actuals to Date Future Total Project 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Years Cost Administration $ 607,271 $ 118,239 $ 56,000 $ 781,510 Acquisition $2,357,447 $ 4,072,266 $ 91,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 6,429,713 Construction $ 503,922 $10,800,000 $5,493,839 $ 16,797,761 Construction $ 444,203 $ 444,203 Engineering $ 1,860,000 $ 931,270 $ 2,791,270 Design $1,910,670 $ 30,671 $ 1,941,341 Environmental $ 765, 000 $ 92,500 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 232,500 Totals $5,379,310 $16,973,676 $6,516,109 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ - $ 28,974,095 Source of Funds: Actuals to Date Future Total Project 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Years Cost Capital Project Reserves $ 129,831 $ 91,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 325,831 DIF (Street Improvements) $ 444,203 $ 444,203 Measure A -Local Street and Road $1,147,289 $ 1,722,062 $ 2,869,351 TUMF (CETAFYRCTCr $ 765, 000 $12, 809, 891 $6,425,109 $ 20,000, 000 TU M F (RCTC)(2) $2,462,295 $ 917,112 $ 3,379,407 TUMF (WRCOG)(3) $ 560,523 $ 560,523 TUMF (WRCOG)(4) $ 1,394,780 $ 1,394,780 Total Funding: $5,379,310 $16,973,676 $6,516,109 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ - $ 28,974,095 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs: 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 (1) TUMF (CETAP'RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to the RCTC Agreement No. 11-72-0036-00 in the amount of $20,000,000 to date ($4,700,000 -ROW $15,300,000 -Construction). (2) TUMF (RCTC) - Regional funding is pursuant to the RCTC Agreement No. 06-72-048-00 for a total of $7,517,000 ($5,517,000 -ROW and $2,000,000- PS&E). Phase I is $1,682,000 -ROW and $203,784-PS&E- See also Phase II. (3) TUMF (WRCOG) - Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05 -SW -TEM -1064 for a total of $4,078,000 ($108,724-PS&E; $3,969,296- PS&E) - See also Phase II. (4) TUMF (WRCOG) - Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 06 -SW -TEM -1079 for a total of $11,575,000 ($975,752-PA&ED; $8,925,000- PS&E; $1,674,248 -ROW) - See also Phase 11. 51 Item No. 11 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager 07 -e -r- 74-19 r -o CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler , Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements — Phase 11, PW09-02 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer David McBride, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: Approve the plans and specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements — Phase 11, PW09-02. BACKGROUND: On May 13, 2008, City Council directed staff to proceed with completing priority public improvements conditioned upon the Roripaugh Ranch Development. The priority improvements consisted primarily of arterial roadways segments of (1) Murrieta Hot Springs Road from Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road, and (2) Butterfield Stage Road from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to La Serena Road. In July of 2009 the City, acting as the Temecula Public Financing Authority, and the Developer of Roripaugh Ranch entered an Agreement allowing the City to take over construction of the aforementioned priority public improvements and establishing funding of the work would through Community Facilities District No. 03.02 bond proceeds. Due to right of way issues the segment of Butterfield Stage Road was broken down into two phases, with Phase 11 consisting of Butterfield Stage Road from Calle Chapos/South Loop Road to La Serena Road. Construction on Phase I of the project began in late November of 2011 and will be completed in August of 2012. The plans & specifications and right of way for Phase II are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the office of the Director of Public/City Engineer. The estimated construction cost for this project is $6,000,000 and the allowable working days are 200 (10 month duration). FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded with Roripaugh Ranch Community Facility District No. 03-02 bond proceeds. Adequate funds are available in the project accounts. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Description 2. Project Location BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION Circulation Project Location uJ uJ g 3 ' ,707. "RING CAMINO CIELO 13 0 /34t, 4411/GH VAL x Z YRD • 100 • CALLE GIRASOL*- tik•ab Ix • t -Z. 0 T3 zit/ 0 0/1 ON 1,14Y.01, •11:"L' 047- J i• 2 0 A 0 0,4 1:2 KLARER us, , *. y S 6 0 11 /5 0) LU 6 Q Z 6 Z ce N4 0 0 al 1, k- ki A sq. Ok — RD ANE CT -..., cr SOUTH LOOP RD CALLE CHAPOS 44, 1.04,o 4)0 °OLDE, </oN Dji,N - ft,QUE Aerial Data - March 2010 0 512.5 1,025 Feet 2050, 46 CITY OF TEMECULA Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2013-17 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION Prosect Description: This project includes the complete design and construction of four lanes on Butterfield Stage Road (from Rancho California Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road), four lanes on Murrieta Hot Springs Road (from Butterfield Stage Road to the City limits), and two lanes on Calle Chapos (from Butterfield Stage Road to Walcott Road), totaling approximately 3.2 miles of road. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by providing a crucial north and south arterial road on the eastern side of the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Protect Status:, Phase 1 of this project is under construction. It is anticipated that Phase II of this project will begin construction during fiscal year 2012-13. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.723 Level: I Project Cost: Actuals to Date Future Total Project 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Years Cost Administration $ 585,319 $ 807,141 $ 100,000 $ 1,492,460 Acquisition $15,006,728 $ 2,051,352 $1,166,991 $ 17,058,080 Construction* $ 504,761 $ 22,153,126 $1,066,991 $ 23, 724, 878 Construction $ 173,808 $ 173,808 Engineering $ 21,480 $ 338,520 $ 360,000 Design $ 572,852 $ 87,052 $1,166,991 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 659,904 Environmental $ 240,000 $ 240,000 Totals $16,691,140 $25,677,191 $1,166,991 $ - $ - $ - $ - $43,535,322 Actua Is Source of Funds: to Date 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Future Total Project Years Cost CFD (Roripaugh Ranch) $15,253,140 $25,503,383 $1,166,991 $ 41,923,514 Reimbursement/ Other (Shea Homes) $ 173,808 $ 173,808 TUMF $ 1,438,000 $ 1,438,000 Total Funding: $16,691,140 $25,677,191 $1,166,991 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 43,535,322 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs: 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 $ 18,360 $ 18,727 $ 19,102 $ 19,484 *Construction funding is for Phase 1 in fiscal year 2011-12 and Phase II in fiscal year 2012-13. Note: Assumes that only minor right-of-way acquisitions would be necessary and that all major right-of-way dedications are voluntary. 47 Item No. 12 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager 07-e-r- rA, CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements and Notice of Completion for the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Energy Management and Retrofit, PW11-05 PREPARED BY: David McBride, Senior Engineer — CIP Bill McAteer, Construction Manager RECOMMENDATION: 1. Accept the construction of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Energy Management and Retrofit, PW11-05, as complete; 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract amount; 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On September 13, 2011, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Golden Arrow Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $342,000 to complete the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Energy Management and Retrofit, PW11-05. The scope of this project included the replacement of 21 HVAC units on the main CRC building, the replacement of all exhaust fans and the installation of a computerized energy management control and programming system for the CRC building and gymnasium. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. All work will be warranted for a period of one year from May 21, 2012; the date the City obtained "beneficial use" of the project improvements. The retention for this project will be released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code Section 7107. FISCAL IMPACT: The Community Recreation Center (CRC) Energy Management and Retrofit Project is included in the City's Fiscal Year 2012-16 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget and was funded with Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG). The base amount of the construction contract was $342,000. Contract change orders totaled $13,670.05, for a total contract amount of $355,670.05. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92589-9033 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to Golden Arrow Engineering, Inc., 1533 E. Grand Avenue, Pomona, CA 91766 to perform the following work of improvement: Community Recreation Center (CRC) Energy Management and Retrofit PW11-05 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on August 14, 2012. That upon said contract the Western Surety Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: Community Recreation Center (CRC) Energy Management and Retrofit PW11-05 6. The location of said property is: 30875 Rancho Vista Rd, Temecula, California 92592. Dated at Temecula, California, this 14th day of August 2012. City of Temecula Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 14th day of August 2012. City of Temecula Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk Bond No. 58688404 Premium included in performance bond CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE BOND FOR COMMUNITY CENTER RECREATION (CRC)ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND RETROFIT PROJECT NO. PW11-05 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT: Golden Arrow Engineering, Inc. 1960 Chicago Ave. Suite D13 Riverside, CA 92507 NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S a Corporation (fil in whethervCorporation, Partnership or individual) . hereinafter called Principal, and Western Surety Company G30UCanoga Ave,Ste 115OVVWoodland Hills, CAQ13G7 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY hereinafter called GURBY, are held and firmlybound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter cafled OWNER, in the penal sum cf Thirty FiveThousand Five Hurdred Sixty Seven DOLLARS and 01 CENTS ($ 35.587.01 ) in lawful money of the United Statgs, said sum being not less than ten (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contnact, for the payment of which, we bind ourae|vea, euoceaoora, and aSsignS. jointly and severally, firrnly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 13th day of September , 2011, a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER (CRC) ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND RETROFIT,PROJECT NO. PW11-05. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the (]VVNER, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on May 21.2O12 .2Q11. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, thaif within one year from the date of approvat of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said vvork, and the caingoutoftheh*rmaOfa8id{}nntroot.Vritaha|iappearthetdefeotivemmteria|ovvere furnished thareunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shalt be void. MAINTENANCE BOND MB -1 rwnnoCRC Spec 000k.docx As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 10th day of July (Seal) SURETY Western Surety Company By: William Syrkin , 2011. 2012 PRINCIPAL Golden Arrow Engineering, Inc. ) g i NA' -/S (Name) (Name) Attorney -in -Fact PRFS iv et - (Title) (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney By: (Name) (Title) Attach Notarial Acknowledgement or Jurat for both the Surety and Principal Signatures MAINTENANCE BOND MB -2 PW11-05 CRC Spec Book.docx Western Surety Company POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Know All Men By These Presents, That WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a South Dakota corporation, is a duly organized and existing corporation having its principal office in the City of Sioux Falls, and State of South Dakota, and that it does by virtue of the signature and seal herein affixed hereby make, constitute and appoint Owen Brown, Richard Adair, William Syrkin, Sergio D Bechara, Margaret Gilmore, Rebecca Haas -Bates, P. Bauer, Individually of Irvine, CA, its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, seal and execute for and on its behalf bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature - In Unlimited Amounts - and to bind it thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by a duly authorized officer of the corporation and all the acts of said Attorney, pursuant to the authority hereby given, are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attomey is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the By -Law printed on the reverse hereof, duly adopted, as indicated, by the shareholders of the corporation. In Witness Whereof, WESTERN SURETY COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Senior Vice President and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed on this 17th day of March, 2011. State of South Dakota County of Minnehaha } ss WESTERN SURETY COMPANY Paul .eNn�.sG Paul . Bruflat, Senior Vice President On this 17th day of March, 2011, before me personally came Paul T. Bruflat, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he resides in the City of Sioux Falls, State of South Dakota; that he is the Senior Vice President of WESTERN SURETY COMPANY described in and which executed the above instrument that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto pursuant to like authority, and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporation. My commission expires November 30, 2012 + r D. KRELL I NOTARY PUBLIC i SOUTH DAKOTA r + r r r CERTIFICATE D. Krell, Noo2ry Public 1, L. Nelson, Assistant Secretary of WESTERN SURETY COMPANY do hereby certify that the Power of Attomey hereinabove set forth is still in force, and further certify that the By -Law of the corporation printed on the reverse hereof is still in force. In testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the said corporation this 10th so y,RE 1W'4O 1.'D Z Form F4250-09-06 day of July 2012 WESTERN SURETY COMPANY 47 CDIr 2&J• L. Nelson, Assistant Secretary CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT �,.•••• n,V,c,✓, •,a.;alc," v q c Ts State of California County of Orange On 07/10/2012 before me, Date personally appeared William Syrkin A. Wilkison, Notary Public Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer Name(s) of Signer(s) A. WILKISON Commission # 1866283 L u !, Notary Public - California z Orange County Comm. Expires Sep 26_2013 C Place Notary Seal Above who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/slae/they executed the same in hisPeer•it reir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/Itter/444e4 signature(4 on the instrument the person*, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons -acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature U`i *ily Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond No. 58688404 Document Date: 07/10/2012 Number of Pages: Two (2) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Individual Corporate Officer — Title(s): Partner — L, Limited O General El Attorney in Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator C Other: William Syrkin Signer Is Representing: Western Surety Company HIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumb here Signer's Name: ❑ Individual [] Corporate Officer — Title(s): i Partner — 0 Limited 0 General Attorney in Fact Trustee E Guardian or Conservator C Other: Signer Is Representing: dr u ut'u r�r r rt�rt'✓ 'rr-ut'u r •u ur•a,t +� u ur'?/t rt`•✓r rt ut'a!L::f ut Top of t. BPRR{T rnb here rt•rt .v art;ri-rt,e/ •e/ 02007 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave.. P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 • www.NationalNotaryorg Item 45907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1-800-876-6827 CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE COMMUNITY CENTER RECREATION (CRC) ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND RETROFIT PROJECT NO. PW11-05 This is to certify that Golden Arrow Engineering, Inc. , (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER (CRC) ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND RETROFIT, PROJECT NO. PW11-05, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Community Recreation Center Maintenance and Energy Management Retrofit, City of Temecula INSERT ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: N/A Description Dollar Amount to Dispute N/A Pursuant to Public Contract Code §7100, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. Dated: 7/9/12 By: RELEASE CONTRACTOR Signatur Kirby Hays, President Print Name and Title R•1 PW11-05 CRC Spec Book.docx Item No. 13 ORDINANCE NO. 12-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(D) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 10.28.010(D) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: Name of Street And Portion Affected Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit Miles Per Hour Butterfield Stage Road La Serena Way to Temecula Parkway 50 Butterfield Stage Road Temecula Parkway to Nighthawk Pass 45 Del Rey Road Via Norte to Calle Pina Colada 30 Del Rey Road Calle Pina Colada to Avenida Del Reposo 35 Jefferson Avenue North City Limits to Rancho California Road Meadows Parkway La Serena Way to De Portola Road 40 45 Meadows Parkway De Portola Road to Temecula Parkway 40 Rancho California Road West City Limit to Diaz Road 50 Rancho California Road Diaz Road to Moraga Road 40 Rancho California Road Moraga Road to Margarita Road 50 R:/Ords 2012/Ords 12-06 1 Rancho California Road Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road 55 Temecula Parkway Bedford Court to Avenida De Missions 50 Temecula Parkway Avenida De Missions to East City Limits 55 Via Norte Solana Way to Calle Pina Colada 30 Via Norte Calle Pina Colada to Avenida Del Reposo 35 Winchester Road Diaz Road to Dendy Parkway 50 Winchester Road Diaz Road to Margarita Road 40 Winchester Road Margarita Road to Nicolas Road 45 Winchester Road Nicolas Road to East City Limits 55 Ynez Road Date Street to Jedediah Smith Road 45 Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 3. The City Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. R:/Ords 2012/Ords 12-06 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of August, 2012. Chuck Washington, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Ords 2012/Ords 12-06 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 12-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of July, 2012, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of August, 2012, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk R:/Ords 2012/Ords 12-06 4 Engineering and Traffic Survey — Summary of Recommendations Recommended Speed Limit OOOOOII) 0OO LO LA LO U) L!) II) M M ('7 OOOOO et III f)1d7U)0 � V 7r V OOOOOOOLS)Lf) LS) '-.u' 7r U) U) Lf) U) OO 0II)L!) LO II) Li) L() Li) Posted Speed Limit u) u) U) LS) O LS) 0 Lf) Lf) U) Lf) U) V I() If) II) 01 () 07 O O O O O VI 7r V In In V) L{i Lf) O 7r V 7r V O O O O O O O LS) 0 LS) U) V 7r V U) U) Lf) Lf) I() If) Lf) LSI If) Lf) LI Lf) Lf) Lf) Segment La Serena Way to Rancho California Road Rancho California Road to Rancho Vista Road Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road Pauba Road to De Portola Road De Portola Road to Temecula Parkway Temecula Parkway to Welton Way Welton Way to Nighthawk Pass Via Norte to Solana Way Solana Way to Calle Pina Colada Calle Pina Colada to Avenida Del Reposo North City Limits to Winchester Road Winchester Road to Overland Drive Overland Drive to Via Montezuma Via Montezuma to Del Rio Road Del Rio Road to Rancho California Road La Serena Way to Royal Oaks Drive Royal Oaks Drive to Rancho California Road Rancho California Road to Rancho Vista Road Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road Pauba Road to De Portola Road De Portola Road to Temecula Parkway West City Limit to Diaz Road Diaz Road to 1-15 Southbound Ramps 1-15 Southbound Ramps to Ynez Road Ynez Road to Via Las Colinas Via Las Colinas to Moraga Road Moraga Road to Cosmic Drive Cosmic Drive to Margarita Road Margarita Road to Meadows Parkway Meadows Parkway to Butterfield Stage Road Bedford Court to Pechanga Parkway Pechanga Parkway to Avenida De Missions Avenida De Missions to Margarita Road Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road Butterfield Stage Road to East City Limits O V O J 1. Butterfield Stage Road 2. Del Rey Road 3. Jefferson Avenue 4. Meadows Parkway 5. Rancho California Road 6. Temecula Parkway Engineering and Traffic Survey - Summary of Recommendations Recommended Speed Limit O O LO CO CO ('7 0 0 0 0 O O O O Lf) Lf) Lf) LO 1O 7r V V V V LO Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf) Lf ) V V V V V Posted Speed Limit Ln LD L) M(7(r) in in 0 O O O O O Ln in in v vv v v7rLf) in 14) 14) 14) in in 14) 14) V V V 14) V 14) Segment Solana Way to Del Rey Road Del Rey Road to Calle Pina Colada Calle Pina Colada to Avenida Del Reposo Diaz Road to Fuller Road Fuller Road to Dendy Parkway Diaz Road to Enterprise Circle North Enterprise Circle North to Jefferson Avenue Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road Ynez Road to Promenade Mall West Promenade Mall West to Promenade Mall East Promenade Mall East to Margarita Road Margarita Road to Roripaugh Road Roripaugh Road to Nicolas Road Nicolas Road to East City Limits Date Street to Equity Drive Equity Drive to Winchester Road Winchester Road to Overland Drive Overland Drive to Solana Way Solana Way to Rancho California Road Rancho California Road to Rancho Vista Road Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road Pauba Road to Santiago Road Santiago Road to La Paz Street La Paz Street to Jedediah Smith Road Location a) O Z as 5 N 8. Winchester Road 9. Ynez Road — DECREASE TO POSTED SPEED LIMIT XX — INCREASE TO POSTED SPEED LIMIT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Item No. 14 ACTION MINUTES of July 24, 2012 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District Meeting convened at 7:49 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 7 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Director Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Director Washington; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the action minutes of July 10, 2012. CSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT 8 Community Services Department Monthly Report CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS 1 CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:50 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 14, 2012, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] 2 Jeff Comerchero, President Item No. 15 COUNCIL BUSINESS Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer Cit Manager Mr - go CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Review the recommendations and goals resulting from the Jefferson Avenue Study Area public visioning process and authorization to proceed with the preparation of a Specific Plan PREPARED BY: Katie Innes, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the recommendations and goals from the Jefferson Avenue Study Area public visioning process and authorize staff to proceed with the preparation of a Specific Plan. BACKGROUND: The Jefferson Avenue Study Area is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, east of Diaz Road/Murrieta Creek and south of Cherry Street. The Study Area is approximately 560 acres and consists primarily of a mix of developed commercial property, and property designated as conservation/open space (Murrieta Creek). At one time, the Jefferson Avenue Study Area was vibrant and bustling with activity — the area was once an important, locally -serving community destination along historic route Highway 395 which was the primary vehicular thoroughfare through the area prior to the construction of Interstate 15. Following the incorporation of the City in 1989, the area continued to develop under typical post -World War II development patterns: an eclectic mix of auto -oriented light industrial, office, strip -commercial and retail uses serving the local community. Although the businesses within the Study Area continue to remain economically -vital, Jefferson Avenue has been overshadowed by new development activity taking place at the Promenade Mall and Old Town. As a result, it was determined that enhancing the study area's economic assets would be critical to sustaining the area's long term future viability. To assist the City with public outreach and visioning, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) selected the Jefferson Avenue Study Area Visioning Process as a "demonstration project," and awarded the City grant funding through their Compass Blueprint program. The City and SCAG selected MIG, Inc. as the planning consulting firm to assist City staff with the public outreach and visioning workshops for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area. The City also hired Inland Planning + Design to assist with the presentation of technical planning topics at the public workshops. The public workshops were intended to cultivate a publicly -driven, community based vision for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area to drive the revitalization and redevelopment of the area in the future. The public participation process included a series of six community workshops held over a nine- month period, as well as multiple stakeholder interviews, and technical analyses from City staff and consultants. The six pubic visioning workshops were held with business owners, property owners, and other interested community members, to develop a community-based vision for the study area's long term future. The task at hand was to develop a vision that would guide the study area's revitalization and future development over the next 30 years. To date, Planning Staff has completed the public visioning workshop series for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area. The visioning workshop dates and topics are outlined below: Visioning Workshop 1 October 18, 2011 Existing Conditions, Future Vision, Opportunities and Challenges Visioning Workshop 2 December 6, 2011 Urban Design and Placemaking Visioning Workshop 3 February 2, 2012 Identifying Conceptual Districts within the Study Area Visioning Workshop 4 April 5, 2012 Transportation and Complete Streets Visioning Workshop 5 June 14, 2012 Market Analysis and Development Scenarios Visioning Workshop 6 July 19, 2012 Visioning Policy Recommendations and Case Studies Visioning Recommendations and Goals Staff and the consultant team have reviewed the feedback received from the workshop attendees over the course of the public visioning workshops and identified eight recommendations and goals that will guide the future vision. At the final Jefferson Avenue Study Area Visioning Workshop, which was held on July 19, 2012, staff received strong support from the public for these eight recommendations and goals. The public supported the development of a specific plan based upon these eight recommendations and goals. The eight recommendations and goals will provide the structure and policy direction for the development of a future Specific Plan for the study area. Furthermore, to obtain additional feedback and to ensure comprehensive involvement from various commissions, staff presented the eight draft recommendations and goals to the Old Town Local Review Board on July 9, 2012, to the Public Traffic Safety Commission on July 26, 2012, the Planning Commission on August 1, 2012 and the Community Services Commission on August 13, 2012. Staff will present a verbal update of the various recommendations from these commission meetings at the Council meeting. Tonight, staff will present the overall future vision, as well as the eight recommendations and goals to the City Council for review and approval and request authorization to proceed with the preparation of a Specific Plan for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area, focusing on the eight recommendations and goals that resulted from the culmination of the nine month visioning process. The eight recommendations and goals for the study area are as follows: Recommendation Goal Recommendation 1: Strengthen Economic Development Goal 1: Spark the revitalization of the area through comprehensive economic development strategies that support a sustainable fiscal foundation for the future. Recommendation 2: Expand the Mix of Uses Goal 2: Allow for greater flexibility and a wider array of land use options within the study area. Recommendation 3: Define Districts and Neighborhoods Goal 3: Encourage the definition and development of districts within the area based upon current and historical uses in order to cultivate unique character. Recommendation 4: Improve Transportation, Mobility, Connectivity and Circulation Goal 4: Encourage the development of a multi -modal, interconnected circulation network that improves circulation for vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians and transit. Recommendation 5: Integrate Recreation, Open Spaces and Trails Goal 5: Encourage public and private investment in the development of world class walking and biking trails, public open spaces and active and passive recreation spaces. Recommendation 6: Create Updated and Flexible Development Standards Goal 6: Create urban development standards that will guide future development while being flexible and adaptable to changing market demands and economic conditions. Recommendation 7: Build and Maintain a Comprehensive Infrastructure System Goal 7: Ensure adequate infrastructure capacity to support future urban development. Recommendation 8: Establish Distinct Identity Goal 8: Establish a recognizable identity, experience, and brand for Uptown Jefferson. At the final Jefferson Avenue Study Area Visioning Workshop, which was held on July 19, 2012, meeting attendees participated in an interactive polling exercise to gauge their level of support for the draft recommendations and goals. The polling results showed strong support for the development of a Specific Plan based upon these eight recommendations and goals. FISCAL IMPACT: If authorized, the preparation of the Specific Plan and associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be required. The Specific Plan will be prepared by City staff in-house. The total cost of the EIR ($189,220) has been budgeted and a contract with Environmental Sciences Associates (ESA) was approved by the former Redevelopment Agency on March 22, 2011. The contract with ESA is an approved Recognized Obligation of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Jefferson Avenue Study Area - Final Vision Report 2. Visioning Workshop # 6 Polling Results 3. Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Report .k e arson avenue City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA CITY OF TEMECULA VISION REPORT Introduction The Jefferson Avenue Study Area, which encompasses approximately 560 acres located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, east of Diaz Road and south of Cherry Street, includes much of city's first commercial development. At one time, the Jefferson Avenue Study Area was vibrant and bustling with activity—the area was once an important, locally -serving community destination along historic route Highway 395 which was the primary vehicular thoroughfare through the area prior to the construction of Interstate 15. Following the incorporation of the City in 1989, the area continued to develop under typical Post -World War II development patterns: an eclectic mix of auto -oriented light industrial, office, strip -commercial and retail uses serving the local community. Although the businesses within the Study Area continue to remain economically -vital, Jefferson Avenue has been overshadowed by new development activity taking place at the Promenade Mall and Old Town. As a result, it was determined that enhancing the study area's economic assets would be critical to the area's and the City's long term future. General Plan Framework The City of Temecula General Plan supports the strategic revitalization efforts of the Jefferson Avenue Study Area. The General Plan encourages mixed-use commercial, office and residential development projects at key locations surrounding Interstate 15 (LU -32). It acknowledges that as Temecula begins to age, development opportunities are emerging within older commercial corridors on both sides of 1-15, and provides opportunities for creative reuse such as commercial, residential, office, employment, technology or mixed-use centers (LU -43). Visioning Purpose and Process In an effort to determine how the study area could evolve over time, the City embarked on a public participation process which included a series of six community workshops, multiple stakeholder interviews, and technical analyses from City staff and consultants over a nine month period. The six pubic visioning workshops were held with business owners, property owners, and other interested community members, to develop a 1 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report jefferson iv nue community-based vision for the study area's long term future. The task at hand was to envision the study area's development potential 30 years from now. Visioning is typically done as the first step for any planning process. The purpose of the visioning process is to have the community assess where they are now, and determine where they hope to go in the future. The community's long-term vision that emerged from this process identified specific action steps that will lead to the transformation of the area over a 30 year timeframe. What it the purpose of the visioning process? Where are we now? Visioning Process Flowchart Future Vision Formulate the implementation framework and strategy Where do we want to be? FuttweJeferso;i Avenue Sp Plan The planning topics covered at the visioning workshops include existing conditions, urban design and "placemaking," districts, transportation and mobility, streets, and an economic market assessment completed for the study area. The Visioning Process Timeline is shown below. 2 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report .E 1910N Jerson Jefferson Avenue Study Area Visioning Workshops Timeline October 18, December 6, 2011 2011 • February 2, 2012 April 5, 2012 June 14, 2012 July 19, 2012 Workshop # 1 Workshop # 2 Existing Conditions, Urban Design & Vision, Opportunities "Mac ernalring" & Challenges Workshop # 3 Went tying Contepttral Dilir iGt9 Workshop # 4 Transportation & Complete Streets Workshop # 5 Market Analysis & Workshop # 6 Development Visioning Policy Scenarios Recommendation* & Case Studies The outcomes of the community discussions and technical analyses contributed to development of the overall vision. This Vision Report includes community -supported policies that promote strategic economic development, enhance property values, and contribute to the long-term health of the local economy and community. This policy framework will serve as the basis for a future Jefferson Avenue Specific Plan and future General Plan Updates. Existing Conditions The Jefferson Avenue corridor (from Cherry Street to Rancho California Road) is approximately 2.3 miles long. Of the study area's 560 acres, 240 acres are currently zoned Open Space -Conservation (OS -C) or Public/Institutional (PI) within the study area, yielding approximately 317 acres of commercially zoned property with future development and revitalization potential. No residential development, mixed use development, parks or recreational facilities currently exist within the study area. The study area benefits from a range of assets including Murrieta Creek and nearby open spaces, successful locally -owned businesses providing niche services and products, hotels, and a tourism base. However, it also experiences significant 3 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report challenges including traffic congestion at key intersections during commute hours, few transportation options, lack of identity, numerous under-utilized or disinvested properties, incomplete public improvements, and no residential uses. Despite the recent economic downturn, Temecula's current population of 103,000 is expected to grow 2% annually over the next 25 years, leading to 112,200 in 2020 and 118,900 in 2035. Where will this growth occur since the City is 85% built -out? General Plan policies encourage development of village centers in older commercial and industrial areas such as the Jefferson Avenue Study Area. This area becomes an important location to capitalize on future economic growth and development. Uptown Jefferson: A New Vision What can we expect? By peering through a visionary Tens, Uptown Jefferson will be Temecula's newest "destination." Vibrant, sophisticated and unique, the area will be home to a diverse mix of residents of all ages, experiences and interests, living in eclectic, up-and-coming neighborhoods. These neighborhoods in Uptown Jefferson provide a unique metropolitan experience, rivaled by no other place in the city or region. The neighborhoods are up -scale and culturally robust, each with a distinct character and identity, offering a mix of homes, shops, offices, restaurants and other locally - serving uses. Complemented by an expanded mix of new locally -owned and corporate businesses, collectively they provide high quality jobs, as well as goods and services to local residents. The urbane neighborhoods in Uptown Jefferson are located within walking distance to a hub of quality and thriving businesses, technologically innovative employment centers, and higher -education facilities. The vibe of Uptown Jefferson fosters creativity, stimulates innovation, and provides a place for community members to work, learn and refashion the world around them. And, historically important locally -owned and operated business and services continue to thrive, side-by-side with the new wave of entrepreneurs. Uptown Jefferson also contributes to the local tourism industry with expanded hotel offerings, restaurants and shops. In addition to expanding its service to traditional weekend -oriented tourism, the stronger presence of businesses and corporations fill hotel rooms and support small conventions and events that occur during the week. Esthetically enhanced and interconnected street networks provide expanded mobility options to residents, workers and visitors. In addition, one-stop parking combined with efficient transit, tree lined sidewalks and safe bikeways create the feeling of "complete streets." These expanded networks of bicycle paths, sidewalks, and multi -use trails connect neighborhoods, businesses, and recreation areas. Trails along Murrieta Creek connect active play fields and parks in the northern area, Old Town in the south, the business park to the west, and Promenade Mall and other neighborhoods to the east. 4 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report IBIUN je erson avenue Uptown Jefferson is designed and built from the collective, shared efforts of public participation, private development, and public investments. These efforts are driven by a community-based vision and priorities for strategic, feasible and flexible revitalization. Policy Framework Eight community -supported visioning themes have been identified resulting from the culmination of the public visioning process. These eight themes provide the structure and direction for development of specific policies and plans for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area. Recommendation 1: Strengthen Economic Development Goal: Spark the revitalization of the area through comprehensive economic development strategies that support a sustainable fiscal foundation for the future. Future Actions: • Build upon the community's existing assets. • Identify a variety of economic development incentives that will encourage public and private reinvestment, attract desired uses, and spur new urban development. • Incentivize the revitalization of underutilized parcels that are currently functioning at less than their market potential. • Encourage property owners to consider the formation of a Business Improvement District. • Implement the City's Quality of Life Master Plan to attract high -wage jobs, quality employers, and higher education facilities into the area. • Build public infrastructure and make investments in public facilities as a catalyst for private investment Recommendation 2: Expand the Mix of Uses Goal: Allow for greater flexibility and a wider array of land use options within the study area. Future Action: • Establish land use standards that will provide a mutually -supportive, economically viable mix of land uses that will: 5 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report P__ erson avenue o Attract professional high -wage jobs and corporate employment opportunities, hotel and tourism related uses, locally -serving retail, higher education, and cultural arts -oriented uses. o Provide high quality urban -residential housing development aligned with market forces and trends. o Activate the area by day, night and weekends. o Provide public open space amenities and recreational opportunities. Recommendation 3: Define Districts and Neighborhoods Goal: Encourage the definition and development of districts within the area based upon current and historical uses in order to cultivate unique character. Future Action: • Identify and establish inter -related, compatible districts and neighborhoods, with their own unique identity, providing opportunities to live, work, shop and play in a compact urban environment. Recommendation 4: Improve Transportation, Mobility, Connectivity and Circulation Goal: Encourage the development of a multi -modal, interconnected circulation network that improves circulation for vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians and transit. Future Action: • Implement Capital Improvement Projects to establish an efficient, interconnected multi -modal mobility network that capitalizes on north -south and east -west circulation connectivity, including: o French Valley Interchange Improvements o Overland Bridge Extension o Rancho Way Extension o Jefferson Avenue Streetscape Beautification • Identify, prioritize, and program new circulation infrastructure projects to enable mobility for vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians and transit. 6 .k.ISION Jefferson avenue City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report • Expand the existing roadway network by establishing development standards that incentivizes the development of human -scaled streets, blocks, alleys, and innovative parking systems. • Expand the feasibility of transit and encourage transit oriented development. • Coordinate with RTA on siting the future transit center. Recommendation 5: Integrate Recreation, Open Spaces and Trails Goal: Encourage public and private investment in the development of world class walking and biking trails, public open spaces and active and passive recreation spaces. Future Actions: • Orient future development to relate to the planned trail network. • Develop form -based standards that will require future development to orient toward open space amenities, particularly Murrieta Creek and the hillside to the west. • Coordinate with the appropriate agencies to construct the Murrieta Creek Flood Control Improvements, trail system and associated recreational amenities. • Work with the appropriate agencies to develop a plan to implement the passive and active recreational opportunities in the flood basin at the north end of the study area. • Develop form -based code standards that will require new development to incorporate plazas, open spaces and passive/active recreational amenities. Recommendation 6: Create Updated and Flexible Development Standards Goal: Create urban development standards that will guide future development while being flexible and adaptable to changing market demands and economic conditions. Future Actions: • Draft a form -based code tailored to the study area to guide future revitalization and achieve the community's overall vision. • Establish development standards that strengthen the character of the streetscape and public realm. 7 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report • -11: • Jefelson avenue • Maximize property values by allowing for greater density and increased building heights, which are both economically feasible and compatible with the character of the surrounding community. • Consider the use of flexible, urban parking standards and parking provisions that allow for shared parking facilities. • Consider a streamlined review process for projects that meet the requirements of the form -based code. Recommendation 7: Build and Maintain a Comprehensive Utility Infrastructure System Goal: Ensure adequate infrastructure capacity to support future urban development • Coordinate with appropriate utility providers, including water, sewer, electrical, solid waste, gas and communications, to ensure adequate service and future capacity. • Develop an infrastructure financing and phasing plan for the area. • Link strategic investments in public infrastructure to community priorities and private developments to support the transformation of the area. Recommendation 8: Establish Distinct Identity Goal: Establish a recognizable identity, experience, and brand for Uptown Jefferson. Future Actions: • Implement Streetscape Beautification Improvements along Jefferson Avenue to create "Temecula's Great Street." • Develop public signage standards as a branding strategy to guide the design and placement of way -finding signage, neighborhood/district monumentation, gateway signage, and light pole banner signs. • Implement a district identity that reflects Highway 395's historic legacy. • Establish branding and/or create themes to guide future development for each defined district or neighborhood. • Emphasize the unique characteristics of the Study Area's location, natural setting, built environment and adjacent uses when establishing branding. 8 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report kf&V!S10N ietterson avenue • Establish architectural guidelines to ensure consistency in building materials and architectural styles to achieve the future vision and identity. Focus Areas [ORIENTED TO STUDY AREA MAP IN DRAFT BROCHURE] During the visioning process, community members, property owners, City staff and consultants identified focus areas that represent potential gateways into the study are, and/or "catalytic" sites that could be a first step in spurring revitalization. In addition, key circulation infrastructure improvements are identified and will be phased -in over time as future development occurs. Overland Drive Gateway Once the city's first true commercial core, this focus area has good east -west vehicular circulation, freeway access and visibility, and a strong connection to the Promenade Mall. The existing Winchester Square shopping center could be transformed as a catalytic site to create Temecula's new city -center, bustling with residential and mixed - used development, allowing residents to walk to nearby goods, services and employment. Winchester Road Gateway The existing eclectic mix of automobile -oriented office, retail, and hotels enjoys direct freeway access, and a visual window from 1-15. The strong east -west connectivity and links to surrounding amenities could support a prominent gateway into the study area, and provide a signature mixed-use district reflecting the area's unique "uptown" identity with urban dwellings in close proximity to employment, recreation and retail. Del Rio Road "Y" Currently characterized by a cluster of older strip -commercial centers and service oriented uses, its proximity to the future Murrieta Creek Trail and western views of the hills could encourage creek -oriented, urban neighborhoods that enhance the overall character of Murrieta Creek. Rancho California Road Gateway: Today's existing cluster of hotels, restaurants and other highway and tourist -oriented commercial uses enjoy strong accessibility, circulation and highway visibility. Building on these assets and close proximity to Old Town, this southern -most gateway to the study area could be enhanced with additional full service hotels, meeting spaces and other tourist serving uses that enhance the area's identity as a visitor -oriented destination. Murrieta Creek Trail Improvements: The study area is set against lush hillside views and bordered by Murrieta Creek to the west, which provides an important eco -corridor connecting the built environment to its nearby natural environs. Future development will orient toward the creek, aligning with 9 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report ISION ieiterson avenue current planning efforts aimed at transforming Murrieta Creek into a vibrant, active recreational amenity with a multi -use trail for pedestrians, cyclists and equestrians. The trail will also provide important connections to Old Town to the south, the active/passive recreational open space area and Murrieta to the north, and the Promenade Mall to the east. Active/Passive Recreational Opportunities: This 115 acre, unimproved detention basin collects rainwater during large storms, and is designated by the City's General Plan as Open Space (OS), which includes areas intended to be used as public or private permanent open space for parks, recreational facilities, trails and natural open space, among others. The Riverside County Flood Control District owns this property and plans to improve the site as an active sports park with baseball/softball diamonds, soccer fields, and trails. These recreational amenities will become a key community feature and destination for sports fans, athletes and recreation enthusiasts alike, providing a welcomed refuge from the surrounding urban landscape. Future Transit Center: The Riverside Transit Agency is currently studying the feasibility of locating a future transit center in the northern portion of the study area near the French Valley Interchange and Cherry Street. The future transit center is expected to become an important part of the regional transportation system, serving commuters, cyclists and pedestrians with local bus service, in addition to bus -rapid transit to surrounding cities and Metrolink stations. Additionally, the transit center will present opportunities for transit oriented development (TOD) to support the feasibility of expanded transit service in the future. Planned Infrastructure Improvements [ORIENTED TO STUDY AREA MAP IN BROCHURE] French Valley Interchange Constructed in two phases, this project includes the construction of a new freeway off - ramp at Cherry Street/French Valley Parkway on southbound Interstate 15. Additionally, Phase 11 involves the construction of a new bridge over interstate 15 will connect Date Street to the east and Cherry Street to the west (5 years to completion). Overland Drive Extension Overland Drive will be extended west of Commerce Center Drive, with a bridge connecting across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road to the west. (5-10 years to completion). Rancho Way Extension Rancho Way will be extended east of Diaz Road, with a bridge connecting across Murrieta Creek and Interstate 15 to the east, eventually connecting to Ynez Road to the east. (20-30 years to completion). 10 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report k I810N Jefferson avenue Next Steps and Implementation This vision and policy framework for the Jefferson Avenue study area represent a major milestone for the community's revitalization and the City of Temecula's continued economic development. Community members, property owners, the City Council, City staff, the development community, and partner agencies will continue to plan collaboratively and strategically to develop the Jefferson Avenue Specific Plan. Upon adoption by the City Council, the Specific Plan will serve as the regulatory policy document guiding the study area's growth over a 30 year horizon. Key planning and implementation partners include: • The City of Temecula • Property Owners and Residents • Community Organizations • Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce • Temecula Convention and Visitors Bureau • Riverside County Flood Control District • Riverside Transit Agency • Jefferson Avenue Study Area Visioning Meeting Attendees • Caltrans Acknowledgements The City of Temecula would like to thank the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for grant funding that was provided as part of their Compass Blueprint Demonstration Project program which made the Jefferson Avenue Study Area Visioning Process possible. Also, special thanks and appreciation for all of the community members who participated in the Jefferson Avenue Study Area visioning workshops and stakeholder interviews, providing valuable feedback and input to help shape the study area's future vision. City Council • Chuck Washington, Mayor • Mike Naggar, Mayor Pro -Tem • Jeff Comerchero, Council Member and Jefferson Avenue Study Area Ad Hoc Subcommittee member 11 City of Temecula: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Draft Vision Report E tdie1st Jefferson avenue • Ron Roberts, Council Member and Jefferson Avenue Study Area Ad Hoc Subcommittee member • Maryann Edwards, Council Member Planning Commission • Carl Carey, Planning Commissioner and Jefferson Avenue Study Area Planning Commission Subcommittee Member • Pat Kight, Planning Commissioner and Jefferson Avenue Study Area Planning Commission Subcommittee Member • Ron Guerriero, Planning Commissioner • Stan Harter, Planning Commissioner • John Telesio, Planning Commissioner City Staff • Bob Johnson, City Manager • Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services • Greg Butler, Director of Public Works • Luke Watson, Senior Planner • Katie Innes, Project Manager • Dale West, Associate Planner • Cheryl Kitzerow, Economic Development Analyst • Annie Bostre-Le, Special Projects Engineer • Barbara Smith, Senior Management Analyst, Community Services Consultants • Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. • Inland Planning + Design 12 Turning Graphical Results by Question Session Name: Current Session Created: 7/19/2012 7:52 PM 1.) I am a... (multiple choice) Responses Resident 9 22.50% Business/Property Owner 17 42.50% Both of the above 8 20% Other 6 15% Totals 40 100% 2.) Recommendation 1: Strengthen Economic Development (multiple choice) Responses Very Supportive 24 63.16% Somewhat Supportive 12 31.58% Not Supportive 2 5.26% Totals 38 100% eResident oBoth of the above • Business/Property Owner D Other Page 1 of 5 1360%. 63.200/0 •Very Supportive oNot Supportive aSornewhat Supportive 3.) Recommendation 2: Expand the Mix of Uses (multiple choice) Responses Very Supportive 34 87.18% Somewhat Supportive 2 5.13% Not Supportive 3 7.69% Totals 39 100% 4.) Recommendation 3: Define Districts and Neighborhoods (multiple choice) Responses Very Supportive 23 63.89% Somewhat Supportive 10 27.78% Not Supportive 3 8.33% Totals 36 100% 5,10% 7.70% IMMO 87.20% ■Very Supportive oNot Supportive ■Somewhat Supportive f •Very Supportive ■Somewhat Supportive oNot Supportive Page 2 of 5 5.) Recommendation 4: Improve Transportation, Mobility, Connectivity and Circulation (multiple choice) Responses Very Supportive 32 84.21% Somewhat Supportive 5 13.16% Not Supportive 1 2.63% Totals 38 100% 6.) Recommendation 5: Integrate Recreation, Open Spaces and Trails (multiple choice) Responses Very Supportive 26 72.22% Somewhat Supportive 4 11.11% Not Supportive 6 16.67% Totals 36 100% DVery Supportive ONot Supportive 84:20% •Somewhat Supportive ■Very Supportive •Somewhat Supportive ONot Supportive Page 3of5 7.) Recommendation 6: Create Updated and Flexible Development Standards (multiple choice) Responses Very Supportive 30 83.33% Somewhat Supportive 4 11.11% Not Supportive 2 5.56% Totals 36 100% 8.) Recommendation 7: Build and Maintain a Comprehensive Utility Infrastructure System. (multiple choice) Responses Very Supportive 31 86.11% Somewhat Supportive 5 13.89% Not Supportive 0 0% Totals 36 100% 11.10%, 5.60% 83.30% •Very Supportive oNot Supportive •Somewhat Supportive 13,9D% L0% ran 1010 88.10% eVery Supportive •Somewhat Supportive oNot Supportive Page 4 of 5 9.) Recommendation 8: Establish Distinct Identity multi • le choice Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not Supportive Totals Res•onses 29 78.38% 6 16.22% 2 5.41% 37 100% 78;40% e Very Supportive ■Somewhat Supportive oNot Supportive Page 5 of 5 ADVISORS IN: REAL ESTATE REDEVELOI'MENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SAN FRANCISCO A. JERRY KEYSER TIMOTHY C. KELLY KATE EARLE FUNK DEBBIE M. KERN REED T. KAWAIIARA DAVID DOEZEMA KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES ADVISORS IN PUBLIC/PRIVATE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services City of Temecula From: KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment LOS ANGELES KATHLEEN H. HEAD JAMES A. RABE I. INTRODUCTION GREGORY D. SOO-HOO KEVIN E. ENGSTROM JULIE L. ROMEY A. Background SAN DIEGO GERALD M. TRIMBLE Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA) prepared a market assessment and evaluation of PAUI. C. MARRA development potential for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area (Study Area). The Study Area boundary is defined as Rancho Califomia Road to the south, Interstate 15 to the east, Cherry Street to the north, and Diaz Road to the west. It is the KMA understanding that the City is interested in determining the types of land uses that the Study Area could support based on prevailing market factors, trade area growth projections, and anticipated macroeconomic changes within each major land use category. In addition, the City plans to adopt a new Specific Plan to encourage new investment and private redevelopment in the Study Area. B. KMA Approach The focus of the KMA market assessment was to evaluate the potential for development of new mixed-use development in the Study Area. The assessment relied upon readily available third -party demographic and market data sources. KMA reviewed both existing and historical market trends to better understand future development potential. KMA also prepared 10 -year market demand projections for various land uses within the Study Area. In completing this assignment, KMA undertook the following principal work tasks: • Reviewed relevant background materials, resource documents, and maps. 1660 HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH. SUITE 716 > SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108 > PHONE 619 718 9500 > FAX 619 718 9508 WWW.KEYSERMARSTON.COM 12111ndh 19545 032 025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 2 Market Assessment • Compiled data on regional and local commercial and residential market conditions. • Conducted interviews with key stakeholders. • Reviewed proposed developments planned or under construction. • Identified the key strengths and weaknesses affecting development potential in the Study Area. • Identified the near- and long-term development opportunities and estimated supportable demand by land use. C. Report Organization This memorandum report has been organized as follows: • Section II presents the KMA key findings in terms of market demand and development opportunities for the Study Area. • Section III presents an overview of demographic conditions for the City of Temecula and surrounding trade area. • Sections IV through VII present the KMA market overviews for employment uses (office and industrial), hotel, residential, and retail land uses, respectively. • Section VIII details limiting conditions pertaining to the KMA market assessment. II. KEY FINDINGS A. Existing Mix of Uses in Study Area The Study Area benefits from excellent freeway frontage and access at the Winchester Road and Rancho California Road interchanges. There is a broad mix of commercial and industrial land uses within the Study Area, including office, industrial/business park, lodging, and specialty and service retail. There are no residential uses in the Study Area. The Study Area is largely built out, with very limited undeveloped contiguous land remaining for development. However, numerous opportunities exist for privately owned land to be redeveloped with new buildings and uses that are better suited for current and future market conditions. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Subject: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment July 27, 2012 Page 3 Existing Mix of Building Area by Use I— Retail • Office • Industrial • Hotel • Institutional • Vacant Buildings B. Overview of Strengths and Weaknesses The following presents the KMA summary of the principal strengths and weaknesses affecting development potential within the Study Area. Strengths Weaknesses • High freeway visibility and access • Incubator for "mom and pop" tenants • Proximity to existing business park (eating and drinking demand) • High personal and household incomes in the trade area • The City is nearly 85% built out • Projected high rate of increases in population, housing units, and jobs over the next 25 years • Lack of district identity/image • Incomplete street grid and wayfinding • Incomplete/inconsistent public improvements • High traffic volume and lack of pedestrian -friendly infrastructure ill- suited to create walkable environment for prospective residents and patrons • Numerous underutilized properties and older retail space exhibit disinvestment • Unsightly land uses will be incompatible with potential new development 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Subject: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment July 27, 2012 Page 4 Strengths Weaknesses • Growing demand for alternative multi- family housing types (townhomes, condominiums, and apartments) resulting from scarcity of land, rising housing costs, and the increase in non - family households • Increasing life expectancy and changing lifestyle patterns support a range of multi -family and mixed-use development types • Apartments represent an increasingly strong investment in locations close to employment and transportation • Rising land values/shrinking employment land inventory in North San Diego County and 1-15 Corridor may present opportunities to attract corporate campuses and/or research facilities • Planned creek bridges, proposed pedestrian/bike trails, and mountain views are an amenity for future residents and visitors • Future planned Temecula Transit Center at the north end of the Study Area to provide additional transportation option • Future French Valley Parkway, connecting Jefferson Avenue and Ynez Road, to provide easier east -west access • Limited vacant development sites available for large-scale campus or master -planned development; assemblage/acquisition required • Absence of residential base to support retail/restaurants or generate nighttime activity • Competition from Old Town and Promenade Mall 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Subject: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment C. Market Support by Land Use July 27, 2012 Page 5 Based on the demographic trends and market conditions for the Study Area and surrounding trade area, KMA assessed the market support for each land use in the near-, mid-, and long- term. These rankings are summarized as follows: Market Support Near -Term by Land Use (0 to 5 years) Mid -Term (5 to 10 years) Long -Term (10+ years) Office Weak Moderate Strong Hotel Weak Moderate Moderate Residential Moderate Strong Strong Retail Weak Moderate Moderate D. Supportable Demand by Land Use KMA projects that over the next 10 years, the Study Area can support a total of 2.4 to 4.1 million square feet (SF) of new development, broken out as follows: 10 -Year Demand by Land Use Low High Office 478,000 SF 717,000 SF Hotel (1) 132 Rooms 293 Rooms Residential (2) 1,368 Units 2,280 Units Retail/Restaurant 142,000 SF 324,000 SF Total New Development SF 2,435,000 SF 4,125,000 SF (1) Assumes 800 gross SF per room. (2) Assumes 1,250 gross SF per unit. E. Development Opportunities and Recommendations Based on the development potential identified above, and the current trends in comparable mixed-use districts, KMA formulated a series of specific development opportunities and related recommendation for the City's consideration. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 6 Market Assessment Image and Distinct Identity New investment in the Study Area in both private development and public infrastructure should strive to foster a district for the Study Area. For example, the City and key stakeholders should consider the following key steps: • Emphasize unique characteristics of the location, natural setting, built environment, and adjacent uses • Establish a branding and/or create themes to guide development: o Access to nature o Active recreation o Health and well-being o Ecological sustainability • Implement monumentation, signage, and wayfinding consistent with district identity • Explore the potential for a Business Improvement District (BID) to manage and promote the Study Area Employment Uses Plans for the Study Area should strive to: • Strengthen the existing employment base and encourage job growth in high wage sectors by attracting high-technology sectors, biotechnology sectors, other innovation/research sectors, and corporate headquarters campuses. • Distinguish the Study Area from the business park area. • Consider the potential to recruit a charter school or higher -education facility/satellite campus focused on science and engineering and/or arts and culture. Commercial and Mixed -Use Development The City should work with existing property owners and/or developers to rehabilitate and/or replace existing underutilized commercial developments with viable uses compatible with the district identity. Key steps should include: • Encourage development that incorporates employment and residential uses integrated either vertically or horizontally with retail uses. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 7 Market Assessment • Target local -serving retail/restaurants and identify sustainable and themed retail uses such as farm -to -table restaurants and food markets, artisan restaurants and shops, craft breweries, wine and gift shops, studios for artists and artisans, and commercial recreation. • Focus on the development of one or more full-service hotels targeted to business travelers with meeting space large enough to accommodate 150+ people. • Encourage placemaking amenities such as outdoor public seating areas, enhanced landscaping, and pedestrian circulation. Residential The City should encourage developments with walkable environments and easy access to retail, services, and amenities. Current market trends indicate that high-end rental apartments are the most likely type of residential development. However, plans for the Study Area should accommodate a variety of housing types, including: • High-density rowhomes/townhomes • Texas "wrap" or podium apartments/condominiums • Both rental and ownership • With or without ground -floor retail uses Public Investment and Amenities New public investment in infrastructure, public facilities, and recreational amenities provides a strong catalyst for private development. The City and key stakeholders should: • Evaluate and prioritize required infrastructure improvements, such as landscaping, street lighting, walkable blocks and sidewalks, monumentation, signage, and wayfinding. • Identify potential recreational amenities/facilities, such as sports fields/complex, water play facilities, parks/picnic facilities, and gathering plazas. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 8 Market Assessment III. DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW This section reviews the demographic factors, obtained through Claritas, Inc., U.S. Census, and California Department of Finance, for the City, 5- and 10 -mile trade areas, and Riverside County. The demographic tables can be found within Appendix A, attached. Key demographic factors are discussed below. • Historically, Riverside County's population growth was mainly attributable to naturally caused increases, versus net in -migration. In the past two decades, net in -migration has become the leading driver in populating Southwestern Riverside County, largely due to housing affordability levels. • According to newly released U.S. Census estimates, the Inland Empire's growth in population continues to outpace the rest of the State. • Temecula's population has increased from 57,700 in 2000 to 103,000 in 2012, or 5% annually. • By 2017, Temecula is expected to see an increase of 7,100 people and 1,300 households. • Population and households in the City are projected to increase by 2% annually over the next 25 years. 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Temecula Population and Household Growth, 2000 to 2035 112,242 118,893 100,097 57,716 34 320 37,171 18,293 2000 2010 2020 2035 o Population u Households 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Subject: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment July 27, 2012 Page 9 • Median household and per capita incomes in the City and trade area greatly exceed those of the County. Estimated Income Characteristics, 2012 5 -Mile Radius 10 -Mile Radius City County Median Household Income 1 $70,600 $74,200 $75,800 $53,800 Per Capita Income $26,900 $27,700 $28,400 $22,100 Aggregate Personal Income $4.4 Billion $8.7 Billion $2.9 Billion $49.2 Billion IV. EMPLOYMENT MARKET OVERVIEW The national residential market downturn contributed to decreased office space demand from related users, e.g., mortgage, title, and escrow companies; lenders and investors; and homebuilders. While the residential downturn was likely the initial cause of the decreased demand for office space, the recession that followed was a major contributing factor for increased vacancies in both office and industrial space. As businesses downsized or closed, the inventory of sublease space put additional downward pressure on rental rates for Class A and B office space. (According to the Building Owners and Managers Association International's rating system, Class A and B office space facilities typically are considered good to premier and have rents that are above average for the region.) In addition, the residential market downturn contributed to decreased industrial space demand from related users, e.g., homebuilders, textile industry, and home furnishings. The industrial sector is anticipated to recover stronger than the other real estate sectors as consumer demand rebound will lead to manufacturing output and growth in the shipment of goods. Industrial vacancy rates are projected to decrease as demand rises and little new construction of industrial space has occurred. As the ratio of office space per employee declines and the increased desire to incorporate amenities and quality of life features within workplaces, office users are shifting toward non- traditional office space. High-tech companies are looking for unusual spaces that are reflective of their corporate culture. Knowledge-based firms are reviving inner-city neighborhoods by adapting and designing building to be more ecologically sustainable. Another new real estate trend that is expected to increase over the next few years is the development of data centers, mainly used by corporations requiring communication speed and power. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 10 Market Assessment Appendix B, attached, presents the detailed market tables for industrial and office uses. The following presents a summary of KMA's key market factors for the employment land uses of office and industrial space: A. Employment Trends • According to the California Employment Development Department, the four largest employment industries in the Inland Empire are in Local Government, Retail Trade, Education and Health Care, and Professional and Business Services. Combined, these industries account for about half of the total jobs in the Inland Empire. • Unemployment rates remain high and are higher in the Inland Empire than other regions in Southern California and the State. • According to Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), employment in the Inland Empire is expected to nearly double the number of existing jobs by 2035 (from 490,000 jobs in 2008 to 967,000 jobs in 2035). • The largest industry sectors in Temecula/Murrieta are Retail Trade (30%), Education and Health Services (15%), and Professional and Business Services (14%). These three industry sectors account for nearly 60% of the total number of jobs in Temecula/Murrieta. • Over the last few years, research and development subsectors such as biopharmaceuticals, research and lab services, medical devices, and biofuels/industrial biotechnology have experienced significant job growth in San Diego County. These increases, combined with rising land values and shrinking employment land inventory in North San Diego County and the 1-15 Corridor, may present opportunities in the long- term to attract corporate campuses and/or research and development facilities to the Temecula Valley. B. Industrial Market Trends The following summarizes key market factors for industrial space in the Inland Empire, City, and trade area: • In terms of industrial space, the Inland Empire contains an estimated 435.6 million SF of industrial space, with about one-fourth of the inventory housed within buildings containing more than 500,000 SF. • In the 1st quarter of 2012, there were 5.2 million SF of industrial space under construction in the Inland Empire. About 60% of this new inventory is being constructed in the City of 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 11 Market Assessment Moreno Valley which is developing a build -to -suit distribution warehouse for the Skechers shoe company. • The Inland Empire industrial market continues to experience an increase in lease rates, which are currently averaging $0.36 per SF. Vacancy is also at its lowest rate since 2007, averaging at 6.34% -- a declining trend that is expected to continue through the end of the year. • The Temecula Valley submarket contained a total of 23 million SF of industrial space, of which nearly 50% is located in the City of Temecula. • The average asking lease rate in the City of Temecula is $0.40 per SF, with an 8.8% vacancy rate. • A survey of industrial building sales over the past three years finds that values for industrial properties in the City range between $65 and $169 per SF, with a median value of $72 per SF. C. Office Market Trends The following summarizes key market factors for office space in the Inland Empire, City, and trade area: • The Inland Empire contains a total of 38.7 million SF of office space with the largest inventory of office space in the City of Riverside (9.6 million SF). • The majority of office space in the Inland Empire is comprised of Class B space. • As of 1st quarter 2012, average asking lease rates in the Inland Empire are at $1.66 per SF with a 17% vacancy rate. • The Temecula Valley contains an estimated 5.8 million SF of office space, which represents approximately 15% of the Inland Empire's total. • The City of Temecula added 420,000 SF of office space in past five years, for a current total inventory of 2.8 million SF. • The average asking lease rate in the City of Temecula is $1.40 per SF, with a 16.8% vacancy rate. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 12 Market Assessment • A survey of office building sales over the past three years finds that values for properties in the City are generally between $120 and $200 per SF. Employment Space Demand KMA prepared a 10 -year demand forecast for office space in the Study Area. KMA's estimate of office space demand is based on anticipated growth in employment by sector in the Temecula/Murrieta area, the percent of workforce requiring office space, and potential capture of office space in the Study Area. On this basis, KMA estimates that the Study Area can support between 478,000 SF (low) and 717,000 SF (high) of office space through 2022. V. HOTEL MARKET OVERVIEW Despite strong market performance in many submarkets, new hotels have been difficult to finance due to the recession, overall market performance, and more stringent lending requirements. In 2008, non-essential travel declined as individuals and businesses became more budget conscious. This trend continued throughout 2009, with declining economic growth, historically high unemployment levels, declining home values, and depressed consumer confidence. Due to these factors, the U.S. hotel market experienced one of the deepest and longest recessions in the history of the lodging industry. In 2010, the Southern California lodging market began to see increases in demand for hotel rooms, with certain submarkets returning to near 2007 occupancy levels. Regardless of market conditions, Southern California remains one of the most desirable visitor destinations in the U.S., due to favorable climate, beaches, and ample entertainment, dining, and shopping opportunities The detailed hotel market tables can be found within Appendix C, attached. The following presents a summary key market factors for the hotel market: • Visitor spending in Temecula Valley has increased from $131 million in 2000 to $557 million in 2010, which represents an increase of 324°x. • Tourism -related employment in the Temecula Valley added 4,480 jobs from 2000 to 2010. • Since 2000, the City has added 10 new hotels representing an additional 715 rooms, not including the 522 rooms at Pechanga, for a total of 1,237 rooms. • Existing hotels in the Study Area account for 35% of the total hotel room inventory in Temecula, wine country, and Murrieta. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 13 Market Assessment Distribution of Existing Hotel Rooms in Temecula/Murrieta • Study Area ■ Old Town Murrieta • Pechanga Resort ▪ Other Parts of Temecula and Wine Country • Hotel room occupancy on Fridays and Saturdays is robust with occupancy rates ranging between 81% and 94% and peaking at nearly 100% during the summer months. • Business travel is low as evidenced by mid -week occupancy ranging between 50% and 60%. • Large meeting space for groups of 150 people or more is limited and can only be accommodated at a few hotels, such as: o Pechanga Resort — 35,600 SF o South Coast Winery —14,400 SF o Temecula Creek Inn — 8,300 SF Hotel Room Demand in the Study Area KMA prepared a 10 -year demand forecast for hotel rooms in the Study Area. KMA evaluated the existing hotel room inventory, occupancy trends, and planned/proposed hotels in order to estimate future hotel demand in the Temecula/Murrieta area. KMA then applied capture rates to estimate the number of rooms that can be supported in the Study Area. KMA estimates that a total of 132 to 293 new hotel rooms can be supported in the Study Area through 2022. 12111ndh 19545 032 025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 14 Market Assessment VI. RESIDENTIAL MARKET OVERVIEW The national rental apartment market is expected to continue to strengthen due principally to two current economic conditions: (1) households that have faced a short sale or foreclosure of a home; and (2) stricter mortgage lending standards that have caused young and/or newly formed households to postpone homeownership. This demand has caused a decrease in vacancy rates and increase in rents. In the long-term, there are strong fundamentals supporting attached housing development in in -fill locations. Scarcity of land, rising housing costs, and the increase in non -family households will continue to generate demand for townhomes, condominiums, and apartments. Higher density residential developed as part of walkable, amenitized, mixed-use districts demonstrates value premiums. One trend that is expected to continue in the multi -family housing market is the development of affordable housing due to the financial benefits (such as tax credits and other financing vehicles) that it offers developers and public agencies. In addition, increasing life expectancy and changing lifestyle patterns will generate demand for alternative development types among the baby boomers/empty nesters and Generations X and Y. Similar to the national housing market, the Southern California housing market seems to have hit bottom, but the recovery is expected to be sluggish. According to the real estate brokerage firm of Grubb & Ellis, development will continue to be slow due to the scarcity of developable land, high construction costs, and underwriting difficulties. The residential market tables can be found within Appendix D, attached. The following presents key market factors for the Inland Empire and Temecula Valley residential market: • Based on a report by Marcus & Millichap, the apartment market has maintained steady improvement since its lowest point in 2009. Effective apartment rents in the Inland Empire have increased about 2% over the past year, yielding a current average monthly rent of $1,004. • Vacancy rates in the Inland Empire have continued to decline and are at their lowest rates since 2007 (4.5% as of 1st quarter 2012). • Sales of apartment buildings in the Inland Empire have increased over the past year, with cap rates hovering around the mid -6% to low -7% range. • Approximately 19% of the housing inventory in Temecula and Murrieta is multi -family. The two cities combined have added about 7,100 multi -family units since 2000. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 15 Market Assessment • A survey of apartment building sales since 2007 finds that there have been few sales in Murrieta and Temecula. The majority of apartment complex sales occurred in 2011 and were located in the City of Murrieta. These sales resulted in a median value of approximately $147,000 per unit, which is generally below replacement costs. • Well -located, highly amenitized apartment communities command higher market rents, e.g., rents of $1.75 per SF per month and up. • According to Beacon Economics, building permits for single-family development continue to decline, but multi -family building permits are flat and are expected to remain flat in the near term. • A survey of median home prices in April 2012 finds Temecula home values are well above the Riverside County median. Residential Unit Demand in the Study Area KMA prepared a 10 -year demand forecast for residential units in the Study Area. The KMA analysis was based on the anticipated growth of multi -family housing units in the Temecula!Murrieta area and applying capture rates to estimate the number of housing units that can be supported in the Study Area. On this basis, KMA anticipates that the Study Area can support a total of 1,368 to 2,280 units through 2022. VII. RETAIL MARKET OVERVIEW Commercial real estate markets are experiencing a high level of uncertainty, dysfunction, and lack of confidence due to the global economic crisis. Problems originally concentrated in the housing market have spread to other land use sectors. The retail sector is particularly impacted, with consumer spending at its lowest level in years, and retail landlords struggling to find or retain tenants. In addition, increases in on-line sales are causing retailers to develop smaller format establishments. Supermarkets and convenience retailers are among the first to begin the transition to smaller formats. Several corporate retailers have scaled back or closed a number of their stores, which has allowed small "mom & pop" stores to take advantage of current market conditions. The current vacancy rates and lower rents have provided them with leasing opportunities in markets that were previously inaccessible. National retail sales are on the rise and discount retailers are doing quite well as they have been able to capture market share from their upscale competitors. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 16 Market Assessment The growth in baby boomer, senior, and immigrant populations is increasing the demand for mixed-use developments with active pedestrian environments that offer specialty stores, eating and drinking, and entertainment venues. In order to capitalize on this demand, regional retail centers are being re -positioned as open-air "lifestyle" or "main street" centers emphasizing apparel, home goods, and electronics stores in combination with restaurants and entertainment. Many of the regional malls throughout Riverside, San Diego, and Orange Counties are undergoing expansion, renovation, and/or re -tenanting along these lines in order to remain competitive. Appendix E presents the detailed tables related to the retail market. The following summarizes key factors in the Inland Empire and Temecula Valley retail market: • According to Voit Real Estate Services, the Inland Empire currently contains a total of 110 million square feet (SF) of retail space. • Retail vacancy in the Inland Empire is currently at 8.7%, which is higher than other Southern California areas. • There is still very little new construction, a trend which is expected to continue until some of the existing vacant space can be absorbed. • Lease rates in the Inland Empire are slightly down from the end of 2011, yielding a current average asking lease rate of $1.32 per SF. • The Temecula Valley represents approximately 16% of the Inland Empire's retail inventory. Temecula and Murrieta combined contain about 9 million SF of retail space. • The City of Temecula achieved a vacancy rate of 13.4% and experienced positive net absorption in 1st quarter of 2012. Asking lease rates are at $1.43 per SF, higher than the Inland Empire average. • A survey of retail building sales in the City (west of 1-15) finds that building values vary widely ranging between $82 per SF for a former grocery store to $202 per SF for a restaurant building. Retail Space Demand in the Study Area KMA prepared a 10 -year forecast for retail space in the Study Area. The KMA estimate of retail space assumes demand from four (4) market segments: 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 17 Market Assessment 1. 10 -mile trade area (visitors from beyond the Study Area) — based on aggregate incremental income resulting from population growth over the next 10 years and estimated capture rates of spending potential in the Study Area. 2. New residents in the Study Area — based on the spending potential of residents choosing to live in the Study Area as a result of new housing developed in the Study Area. 3. New office workers in the Study Area — based on a capture of a portion of the new employment workforce (daytime population) derived from new office development that will potentially spend dollars in the Study Area on retail goods and services. 4. New hotel visitors in the Study Area — based on a capture of a portion of visitor spending from hotel visitors occupying newly developed hotel rooms within the Study Area. Based on these assumptions, KMA estimates 10 -year demand from these segments will total 141,600 SF (low) to 324,000 SF (high) of retail space. VIII. LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. KMA has made extensive efforts to confirm the accuracy and timeliness of the information contained in this document. Such information was compiled from a variety of sources deemed to be reliable including State and local government, planning agencies, and other third parties. Although KMA believes all information in this document is correct, it does not guarantee the accuracy of such and assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies in the information provided by third parties. Further, no guarantee is made as to the possible effect on development of current or future Federal, State, or local legislation including environmental or ecological matters. 2. The accompanying projections and analyses are based on estimates and assumptions which were developed using currently available economic data, project -specific data, and other relevant information. It is the nature of forecasting, however, that some assumptions may not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes are likely to be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, require review or revision of this document. 3. The findings are based on economic rather than political considerations. Therefore, they should be construed neither as a representation nor opinion that government approvals for development can be secured. 12111ndh 19545.032.025 To: Patrick Richardson, Director of Development Services July 27, 2012 Subject: Jefferson Avenue Study Area Page 18 Market Assessment 4. Development opportunities are assumed to be achievable during the specified time frame. A change in development schedule requires that the conclusions contained herein be reviewed for validity. 5. The analysis, opinions, recommendations and conclusions of this document are KMA's informed judgment based on market and economic conditions as of the date of this report. Due to the volatility of market conditions and complex dynamics influencing the economic conditions of the building and development industry, conclusions and recommended actions contained herein should not be relied upon as sole input for final business decisions regarding current and future development and planning. attachments 12111ndh 19545.032.025 Technical Appendix Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment City of Temecula Tables in Technical Appendix Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment APPENDIX A: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Table A-1 Overview of Population and Households, 2012 to 2017 Table A-2 Comparative Overview of Income Characteristics, 2012 Table A-3 Distribution of Population by Age Group and Area, 2012 APPENDIX B: EMPLOYMENT USES Table B-1 Table B-2 Table B-3 Table B-4 Table B-5 Table B-6 Table B-7 Table B-8 Table B-9 Employment Trends by Industry and Area, 2006 to 2011 Industrial Space Market Factors, Temecula/Murrieta, 2007 to 2012 Industrial Building Sales, 2009 through 1st Quarter 2012 Office Space Market Factors, Temecula/Murrieta, 2007 to 2012 Office Building Sales, 2009 through 1st Quarter 2012 Vacant Developable Employment Acres, North San Diego County, 2008 to 2030 Estimate of Additional Office Space Needed, Temecula/Murrieta, through 2022 - Low Estimate of Additional Office Space Needed, Temecula/Murrieta, through 2022 - High Summary of Office Space Demand, Jefferson Study Area, through 2022 APPENDIX C: HOTEL MARKET Table C-1 Table C-2 Table C-3 Table C-4 Table C-5 Table C-6 Table C-7 APPENDIX D: Table D-1 Table D-2 Table D-3 Table D-4 Table D-5 Inventory of Existing Hotels, Temecula/Murrieta, 2012 Hotel Room Supply and Demand, 2000 to 2011 Hotel Room Occupancy and Average Daily Rate by Day of Week Estimate of Hotel Room Night Demand, 2012 through 2022 - Low Estimate of Hotel Room Night Demand, 2012 through 2022 - High Projected Hotel Room Night Supply vs. Demand, 2012 through 2022 Summary of Hotel Room Demand, Jefferson Study Area, through 2022 RESIDENTIAL MARKET Housing Inventory Trends, Temecula/Murrieta, 2000 to 2010 Summary of Apartment Market Rents, Temecula/Murrieta, 2012 Apartment Complex Sales, Temecula/Murrieta, 2007 through 1st quarter 2012 Trends in Median Home Sales Price, Temecula/Murrieta, 2007 to 2012 New Housing Units, Temecula/Murrieta and Jefferson Study Area, through 2022 APPENDIX E: RETAIL MARKET Table E-1 Table E-2 Table E-3 Table E-4 Table E-5 Table E-6 Table E-7 Table E-8 Retail Space Market Factors, Temecula/Murrieta, 2007 to 2012 Retail Building Sales, 2009 through 1st Quarter 2012 10 -Mile Trade Area Demand Projection, Jefferson Study Area, 2012 through 2022 Aggregate Household Income, Incremental New Residents, Jefferson Study Area Retail Expenditures Captured from Incremental New Residents, Jefferson Study Area Retail Demand from New Office Workers, Jefferson Study Area Retail Demand from New Hotel Rooms, Jefferson Study Area Summary of Retail Demand, Jefferson Study Area, through 2022 APPENDIX A Demographic Profile TABLE A-1 COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW OF POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS, 2012 TO 2017 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA I. Population A. 2012 Population (Estimate) Historical Average Annual Growth, 2000-2012 B. 2017 Population (Forecast) Average Annual Growth, 2012-2017 C. Median Age, 2012 (Years) 5 -Mile 10 -Mile City of Riverside Ring (1) Ring (1) Temecula (2) County 162,595 4.74% 186,207 2.75% 312,172 5.99% 364,075 3.12% 103,092 4.95% 110,189 1.34% 2,227,577 3.09% 2,524,143 2.53% 31.5 32.8 31.4 33.3 II. Households A. 2012 Households (Estimate) Historical Average Annual Growth, 2000-2012 B. 2017 Households (Forecast) Average Annual Growth, 2012-2017 C. Average Household Size, 2012 51,548 4.64% 58,569 2.59% 96,728 5.65% 111,494 2.88% 3.13 3.21 (1) From the 27000 block of Commerce Center Drive. (2) KMA adjusted current and projected population and household growth based on 2010 Census figures. Source: Claritas, Inc.; California Department of Finance Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename:Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment17/27/2012;ema 32,521 4.91% 33,795 0.77% 709,529 2.85% 779,796 1.91% 3.14 3.16 TABLE A-2 COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW OF INCOME CHARACTERISTICS, 2012 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA 5 -Mile 10 -Mile City of Riverside Ring (1) Ring (1) Temecula County Median Household Income $70,635 $74,211 $75,757 $53,770 Per Capita Income (PCI) $26,931 $27,748 $28,371 $22,076 Aggregate Personal Income $4.38 $8.66 $2.92 $49.18 Billion Billion Billion Billion (1) From the 27000 block of Commerce Center Drive. Source: Claritas, Inc. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment\7/27/2012;ema TABLE A-3 DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION BY AGE GROUP AND AREA, 2012 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA 17 and 55 and Under 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 Above Five -Mile Ring (1) 31.8% 9.8% 12.9% 13.9% 15.4% 16.3% Ten -Mile Ring (1) 30.0% 9.9% 12.9% 12.7% 15.9% 18.7% City of Temecula 31.9% 9.8% 12.9% 14.0% 15.6% 15.9% Riverside County 29.1% 9.7% 13.4% 13.7% 13.4% 20.7% (1) From the 27000 block of Commerce Center Drive. Source: Claritas, Inc. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;7/27/2012;ema APPENDIX B Employment Uses TABLE B-1 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS BY INDUSTRY AND AREA, 2006-2011(1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKETASSESSMENI CITY OF TEMECULA Temecula/Murrieta Riverside/San Bernardino Counties Average Average 2006 % of 2011 % of Annual 2000 % of 2006 % of Annual 2011 % of Total Total Total Total 2006-2011 Total Total Total Total 2000-2006 Total Total Retail Trade 19,746 26.4% 21,760 29.7% 2.0% 127,000 12.8% 173,200 13.7% 5.3% 157,200 13.9% Professional and Business Services 10,153 13.6% 10,006 13.6% -0.3% 96,800 9.8% 142,400 11.2% 6.6% 126,100 11.2% Educational and Health Services 9,475 12.7% 10,620 14.5% 2.3% 101,900 10.3% 122,100 9.6% 3.1% 137,900 12.2% Finance, Insurance, and Information 8,021 10.7% 6,609 9.0% -3.8% 50,000 5.1% 66,800 5.3% 4.9% 54,200 4.8% Leisure and Hospitality 5,710 7.6% 6,567 9.0% 2.8% 100,600 10.2% 128,100 10.1% 4.1% 124,300 11.0% Transportation, Warehousing, and Wholesale 5,806 7.8% 6,231 8.5% 1.4% 84,500 8.5% 118,000 9.3% 5.7% 117,900 10.4% Manufacturing 6,838 9.1% 5,298 7.2% -5.0% 119,700 12.1% 123,400 9.7% 0.5% 85,800 7.6% Construction 5,376 7.2% 3,885 5.3% -6.3% 79,900 8.1% 127,500 10.1% 8.1% 58,700 5.2% Government 1,376 1.8% 1,031 1.4% -5.6% 192,100 19.4% 222,500 17.5% 2.5% 227,300 20.1% Natural Resources and Mining 1,008 1.3% 861 1.2% -3.1% 1,300 0.1% 1,400 0.1% 1.2% 1,000 0.1% Other Services 1,362 1.8% 474 0.6% -19.0% 34,800 3.5% 42,500 3.4% 3.4% 39,300 3.5% Average Annual 2006-2011 -1.9% -2.4% 2.5% -4.1% -0.6% 0.0% -7.0% -14.4% 0.4% -6.5% -1.6% Total Employment 74,871 100.0% 73,342 100.0% -0.4% 988,600 100.0% 1,267,900 100.0% 4.2% 1,129,700 100.0% -2.3% (1) Reflects employment by place of work. Source: Claritas, Inc. and Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information Division Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment17/2712012;ema TABLE B-2 INDUSTRIAL SPACE MARKET FACTORS, TEMECULAIMURRIETA, 2007-2012 (1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (2) I. Temecula Rentable Area (SF) 10,722,439 10,869,220 11,484,270 11,484,270 11,484,270 11,489,680 Vacancy Rate 5.9% 6.5% 8.4% 7.1% 6.4% 8.9% Average Asking Lease Rate (3) $0.70 $0.62 $0.48 $0.42 $0.41 $0.40 Net Absorption YTD 9,451 65,656 359,796 154,559 75,079 (282,307) Change, 2007-2012 Averag e Absolute Annual 767,241 1.4% 8.6% ($0.30) -10.6% II. Murrieta Rentable Area (SF) 4,678,769 4,808,113 4,808,113 4,832,713 4,832,713 4,832,713 Vacancy Rate 5.4% 8.3% 11.3% 10.5% 8.1% 8.0% Average Asking Lease Rate (3) $0.81 $0.73 $0.52 $0.49 $0.45 $0.45 (4) Net Absorption YTD 415,531 (19,341) (144,975) 63,908 111,821 9,139 153,944 0.6% 8.2% ($0.36) -11.1% III. Total Rentable Inventory - TemeculalMurrieta 15,401,208 15,677,333 16,292,383 16,316,983 16,316,983 16,322,393 (1) Survey consists of buildings containing more than 5,000 SF. (2) Based on 1st quarter data. (3) Per SFfmonth triple -net (NNN). (4) Lease rate not available. KMA has assumed no change from 4th quarter 2011. Source: Voit Real Estate Services Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment1712712012;ema 921,185 1.2% TABLE B-3 INDUSTRIAL BUILDING SALES, 2009 THROUGH 1ST QUARTER 2012 (1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Date Sold Address 05/03/10 04/02/09 07/17/09 01/24/12 07/06/11 04/23/11 10/06/09 12/30/10 08/09/11 10/05/11 11/08/11 42181 Avenida Alvarado 27590 Commerce Center Dr. 42363 Avenida Alvarado 27260 Jefferson Ave. 42142 Roick Dr. 27531 Enterprise Circle W. - Bldg. B 27635 Diaz Rd. 42192 Sarah Way 42380 Zevo Dr. 42136 Sarah Way 42387 Avenida Alvarado Sales Price Acres $1,140,000 $1,032,954 $890,900 $2,603,140 $1,150,000 $599,000 $2,798,470 $450,000 $1,278,808 $820,000 $870, 740 N/A 0.50 0.46 2.02 1.06 0.95 10.43 0.70 1.32 0.70 0.91 Building SF ISE 6,728 8,398 8,160 25,810 13,518 8,344 39,129 6,300 18,806 12, 449 13,396 $169 $123 $109 $101 $85 $72 $72 $71 $68 $66 $65 Year Built Property Description 1988 1990 1989 1995 2003 2005 1985 1987 1999 1987 1988 Class C R&D building Class C warehouse Class B warehouse Class B warehouse Class B warehouse Class B distribution Class B manufacturing Class B warehouse Class C manufacturing Class C manufacturing Class C warehouse Minimum Maximum Median Average (1) Survey area represents the City of Temecula, west of Interstate 15. Source: CoStar Group Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment\7/27/2012; ema $450,000 $2,798,470 $1,032,954 $1,239,456 0.46 10.43 0.93 1.91 6,300 39,129 12, 449 14,640 $65 $169 $72 $91 1985 2005 1989 1992 TABLE B-4 OFFICE SPACE MARKET FACTORS, TEMECULAIMURRIETA, 2007-2012 (1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (2) I. Temecula Rentable Area (SF) 2,388,643 2,670,429 2,715,274 2,811,274 2,811,274 2,811,274 Vacancy Rate 15.5% 23.0% 20.6% 20.0% 18.2% 16.8% Average Asking Lease Rate (3) $1.90 $1.69 $1.44 $1.32 $1.24 $1.40 Net Absorption YTD 112,263 36,537 99,698 92,565 51,463 49,748 Change, 2007-2012 Average Absolute Annual 422,631 3.3% 1.7% ($0.50) -5.9% II. Murrieta Rentable Area (SF) 1,258,834 1,354,079 1,411,992 1,411,992 1,411,992 1,523,748 Vacancy Rate 19.8% 23.5% 24.3% 24.0% 21.2% 19.6% Average Asking Lease Rate (3) $2.37 $2.08 $1.85 $1.72 $1.67 $1.35 Net Absorption YTD 182,137 26,271 33,390 3,601 40,392 41,278 264,914 3.9% -0.2% ($1.02) -10.6% III. Total Rentable Inventory - TemeculalMurrieta 3,647,477 4,024,508 4,127,266 4,223,266 4,223,266 4,335,022 (1) Survey consists of buildings containing more than 10,000 SF. (2) Based on 1st quarter data. (3) Per SFlmonth full-service gross. Source: Voit Real Estate Services Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment1712712012;ema 687,545 3.5% TABLE B-5 OFFICE BUILDING SALES, 2009 THROUGH 1ST QUARTER 2012 (1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Date Sold Address Traditional Office Space Building Year Sales Price Acres SF $/SF Built Property Description 06/30/10 43448-43450 Business Park Dr., Bldg. M $812,500 0.09 4,095 $198 2006 Class B office 04/30/10 28475 Old Town Front St. $775,000 0.20 4,000 $194 1979 Class C office 04/23/10 27476-27482 Via Industria, Bldg. B $1,935,020 4.87 11,216 $173 2008 Class B office 03/15/11 41840 Enterprise Circle N. $2,000,000 1.85 11,805 $169 1991 Class C office 09/11/09 43448-43450 Business Park Dr., Bldg. M $625,000 0.09 4,095 $153 2006 Class B office 06/30/09 43525 Ridge Park Dr. $842,501 0.19 6,499 $130 1991 Class B office 12/30/10 27268 Via Industria, Bldg. L $375,000 N/A 3,072 $122 2008 Class B office 09/24/10 43513 Ridge Park Dr. $515,000 0.06 5,144 $100 1991 Class B office 12/01/10 41951 Remington Ave. $2,500,000 6.72 32,500 $77 2007 Class B office Minimum $375,000 0.06 3,072 $77 1979 Maximum $2,500,000 6.72 32,500 $198 2008 Median $812,500 0.19 5,144 $153 2006 Average $1,153,336 1.76 9,158 $146 1999 Office Condominiums 02/16/10 41900 Winchester Rd., Unit 100 $600,000 N/A 2,831 $212 2007 Office condominium 07/22/09 43442-43446 Business Park Dr., Unit C2 $330,000 N/A 1,644 $201 2006 Office condominium (1) Survey area represents the City of Temecula, west of Interstate 15. Source: CoStar Group Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment\7/27/2012; ema TABLE B-6 VACANT DEVELOPABLE EMPLOYMENT ACRES, NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY, 2008 TO 2030 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA 2008 2030 Average Annual Acres Absorbed Commercial/ Commercial/ Commercial/ CitvlCommunity Industrial Office Services Total Industrial Office Services Total Industrial Office Services Total Carlsbad 507 22 149 678 169 14 51 234 15 0 4 20 Escondido 115 29 227 371 36 7 78 121 4 1 7 11 San Marcos 327 14 145 486 236 10 67 313 4 0 4 8 Oceanside 319 43 319 681 153 23 174 350 8 1 7 15 Poway 164 8 28 200 99 5 14 118 3 0 1 4 Rancho Bernardo 44 55 4 103 17 4 2 23 1 2 0 4 Vista 98 10 214 322 22 3 88 113 3 0 6 10 Totals 1,574 181 1,086 2,841 732 66 474 1,272 38 5 28 71 Source: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessmenti712712012; ema TABLE B-7 ESTIMATE OF ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE NEEDED, TEMECULAIMURRIETA, THROUGH 2022 - LOW JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Num ber of Em ployees 2011 (1) Retail Trade 21,760 Professional and Business Services 10,006 Educational and Health Services 10,620 Finance, Insurance, and Information 6,609 Leisure and Hospitality 6,567 Transportation, Warehousing, and Wholesale 6,231 Manufacturing 5,298 Construction 3,885 Government 1,031 Natural Resources and Mining 861 Other Services 474 Averag e Annual Rate 2011-2022 (2) 4.5% 4.5% 5.0% 3.0% 4.0% 1.0% 2.5% 2.5% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% Number of Employees % 2022 of Total 33,793 32% 15,539 15% 17,299 16% 8,882 8% 9,721 9% 6,883 6% 6,782 6% 4,973 5% 1,257 1% 861 1% 474 0% Num ber of Portion Using Number of # of SF Em ployees Office New Office Per Person c Added/(Lost) Space (3) Users 200 (4) 12,033 20% 5,533 75% 6,679 50% 2,273 75% 3,154 5% 652 5% 1,484 5% 1,088 5% 226 10% 0 0% 0 100% 2,407 481,000 SF 4,150 830,000 SF 3,339 668,000 SF 1,705 341,000 SF 158 32,000 SF 33 7,000 SF 74 15,000 SF 54 11,000 SF 23 5,000 SF 0 0 SF 0 0 SF Total - Cities of Temecula/Murrieta 73,342 3.4% 106,463 100% 33,121 36% 11,942 2,390,000 SF Average Annual 239,000 SF (1) Source: Claritas, Inc. Reflects employment by place of work. (2) KMA estimate based on review of annual growth rates in Riverside and San Bemardino Counties for each employment category. (3) KMA assumption. (4) Reflects rentable SF of office space. KMA assumption. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;712712012;ema TABLE B-8 ESTIMATE OF ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE NEEDED, TEMECULAIMURRIETA, THROUGH 2022 - HIGH JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Num ber of Em ployees 2011 (1) Retail Trade 21,760 Professional and Business Services 10,006 Educational and Health Services 10,620 Finance, Insurance, and Information 6,609 Leisure and Hospitality 6,567 Transportation, Warehousing, and Wholesale 6,231 Manufacturing 5,298 Construction 3,885 Government 1,031 Natural Resources and Mining 861 Other Services 474 Averag e Annual Rate 2011-2022 (2) 5.0% 5.0% 5.5% 3.5% 5.0% 1.5% 5.0% 5.0% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% Number of Employees % 2022 of Total 35,445 31% 16,299 14% 18,140 16% 9,323 8% 10,697 9% 7,231 6% 8,630 8% 6,328 6% 1,526 1% 861 1% 474 0% Num ber of Portion Using Number of # of SF Em ployees Office New Office Per Person c Added/(Lost) Space (3) Users 200 (4) 13,685 20% 6,293 75% 7,520 50% 2,714 75% 4,130 5% 1,000 5% 3,332 5% 2,443 5% 495 10% 0 0% 0 100% 2,737 547,000 SF 4,720 944,000 SF 3,760 752,000 SF 2,035 407,000 SF 206 41,000 SF 50 10,000 SF 167 33,000 SF 122 24,000 SF 50 10,000 SF 0 0 SF 0 0 SF Total - Cities of Temecula/Murrieta 73,342 4.2% 114,954 100% 41,612 33% 13,847 2,768,000 SF Average Annual 276,800 SF (1) Source: Claritas, Inc. Reflects employment by place of work. (2) KMA estimate based on review of annual growth rates in Riverside and San Bemardino Counties for each employment category. (3) KMA assumption. (4) Reflects rentable SF of office space. KMA assumption. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;712712012;ema TABLE B-9 SUMMARY OF OFFICE SPACE DEMAND, JEFFERSON STUDY AREA, THROUGH 2022 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA I. Estimated Office Demand Office Space Need through 2022 Jefferson Avenue Study Area Capture @ Low 2,390,000 SF 20.0% High 2,768,000 SF 30.0% II. Total Office Space Demand through 2022 Average Annual Space Demand 478,000 SF 47,800 SF 717,000 SF 71,700 SF Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;7/27/2012;ema APPENDIX C Hotel Market TABLE C-1 INVENTORY OF EXISTING HOTELS, TEMECULAIMURRIETA, 2012 (1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Participate AAA Rack Rates Meeting Year in STR Trend Rating Hotel/Location Location Rooms (Low/High) Space (SF) Built Report? Not Rated Ponte Vineyard Inn Temecula 60 N/A N/A 2012 No 35001 Rancho California Road Not Rated SpringHill Suites Temecula Valley Wine Country Temecula 134 $109 to $189 2,490 2009 Yes 28220 Jefferson Avenue ♦*♦ La Quinta Inns & Suites Temecula 56 $98 to $164 630 2008 Yes 27330 Jefferson Avenue ♦+4 Fairfield Inn & Suites Temecula 94 $71 to $102 200 2007 Yes 27416 Jefferson Ave ♦4♦ Hampton Inn & Suites Temecula 99 $119 to $219 1,100 2004 Yes 28190 Jefferson Avenue Not Rated South Coast Winery Resort Temecula 76 $199 to $289 14,400 2004 No 34843 Rancho California Road ♦♦ Comfort Inn & Suites Near Temecula Wine Country Murrieta 65 $75 to $100 0 2003 Yes 41005 California Oaks Road Not Rated Extended Stay America Temecula 107 $60 to $120 0 2002 Yes 27622 Jefferson Avenue ♦4+4 Pechanga Resort Temecula 522 $119 to $999 35,600 2002 No 45000 Pechanga Parkway Not Rated Inn at Churon Winery Temecula 24 $180 to $450 3,300 2001 No 33233 Rancho California Road +4+ Holiday Inn Express Temecula 90 $89 to $219 625 1999 Yes 27660 Jefferson Avenue Source: Smith Travel Research, Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, AAA, Internet research Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment17/27/2012;ema TABLE C-1 INVENTORY OF EXISTING HOTELS, TEMECULAIMURRIETA, 2012 (1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Participate AAA Rack Rates Meeting Year in STR Trend Rating Hotel/Location Location Rooms (Low/High) Space (SF) Built Report? +4+ Embassy Suites Temecula 176 $109 to $199 3,500 1990 Yes 29345 Rancho California Road ♦♦ Ramada Inn Temecula 70 $58 to $140 535 1989 Yes 28980 Old Town Front Street ♦♦ Quality Inn Wine Country (formerly Comfort Inn) Temecula 74 $86 to $86 500 1989 Yes 27338 Jefferson Avenue Not Rated Motel 6 Temecula 135 $50 to $80 0 1988 Yes 41900 Moreno Road ♦♦ Best Western Country Inn Temecula 74 $69 to $159 0 1987 Yes 27706 Jefferson Avenue Not Rated Rodeway Inn Temecula 39 $60 $150 0 1983 Yes 28718 Old Town Front Street Not Rated Rancho California Inn Temecula 24 N/A 0 1983 No 41873 Moreno Road ♦•♦ Temecula Creek Inn Temecula 130 $119 to $249 8,300 1969 Yes 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road Not Rated Palomar Inn Hotel Temecula 10 $50 to $96 0 1927 No 28522 Old Town Front Street Total/Average 2,059 $50 to $999 71,180 (1) Excludes bed and breakfast inns. Source: Smith Travel Research, Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, AAA, Internet research Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment17/27/2012;ema TABLE C-2 HOTEL ROOM SUPPLY AND DEMAND, 2000 to 2011 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Participating Room Night Supply Room Night Demand Room Occupancy Number of Number Percent Percent Percent Year Hotels (1) of Rooms Total Increase Total Increase Total Increase 2000 8 739 269,735 188,265 69.8% 2001 8 739 269,735 0.0% 200,049 6.3% 74.2% 6.3% 2002 9 895 304,227 12.8% 234,392 17.2% 77.0% 3.9% 2003 10 960 334,605 10.0% 233,017 -0.6% 69.6% -9.6% 2004 11 1,059 371,586 11.1% 258,841 11.1% 69.7% 0.0% 2005 11 1,059 386,535 4.0% 270,384 4.5% 70.0% 0.4% 2006 11 1,059 386,535 0.0% 280,075 3.6% 72.5% 3.6% 2007 12 1,153 415,299 7.4% 306,661 9.5% 73.8% 1.9% 2008 13 1,209 437,981 5.5% 270,893 -11.7% 64.4% -12.8% 2009 14 1,343 457,633 4.5% 270,893 0.0% 59.2% -8.1% 2010 14 1,343 490,195 7.1% 301,024 11.1% 61.4% 3.7% 2011 14 1,342 490,042 0.0% 324,712 7.9% 66.3% 7.9% Average Annual Increase, 2000-2005 7.5% 7.5% Average Annual Increase, 2006-2011 4.9% 3.0% Average Annual Increase, 2000-2011 5.6% 5.1 % (1) See Table C-1 for list of participating hotels. Source: Smith Travel Research Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;7/27/2012;ema TABLE C-3 HOTEL ROOM OCCUPANCY AND AVERAGE DAILY RATE BY DAY OF WEEK(1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA I. Occupancy Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday March 2011 49.8% 59.2% 61.0% 62.8% 66.0% 77.1% 92.8% April 2011 45.0% 54.6% 58.0% 59.0% 61.3% 86.7% 95.4% May 2011 56.8% 47.4% 52.2% 58.6% 61.9% 87.2% 97.3% June 2011 56.7% 62.5% 66.7% 62.7% 65.6% 91.5% 99.0% July 2011 62.7% 58.6% 65.8% 75.2% 73.5% 85.5% 99.2% August 2011 51.7% 57.2% 58.6% 59.5% 67.4% 83.7% 97.7% September 2011 62.7% 50.6% 54.5% 59.2% 67.1% 85.1% 98.6% October 2011 53.5% 54.7% 62.4% 59.5% 63.4% 85.6% 97.9% November 2011 49.5% 52.2% 57.2% 64.5% 77.7% 88.2% 88.6% December 2011 43.5% 45.4% 47.8% 50.2% 47.6% 57.1% 82.7% January 2012 46.6% 44.8% 50.8% 51.4% 52.8% 70.7% 86.3% February 2012 59.5% 50.2% 60.4% 55.4% 57.0% 79.1% 93.7% Total Year 53.3% 53.0% 57.8% 60.0% 63.3% 81.3% 94.1% Total Month 66.6% 67.4% 64.6% 71.6% 75.2% 67.1% 68.8% 68.2% 67.8% 54.3% 56.6% 64.7% 66.0% II. Average Daily Rate Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday March 2011 $81 $84 $83 $82 $83 $102 $120 April2011 $81 $83 $85 $86 $85 $106 $120 May 2011 $93 $85 $82 $82 $85 $112 $127 June 2011 $85 $86 $86 $82 $84 $118 $127 July 2011 $87 $84 $84 $82 $83 $110 $126 August2011 $79 $82 $80 $80 $83 $112 $125 September 2011 $88 $87 $89 $87 $88 $111 $131 October2011 $82 $85 $85 $82 $82 $110 $125 November 2011 $83 $84 $82 $85 $85 $111 $121 December 2011 $77 $80 $80 $78 $76 $98 $123 January 2012 $80 $83 $84 $82 $79 $100 $114 February 2012 $83 $85 $85 $84 $81 $110 $125 Total Year $84 $84 $84 $83 $83 $109 $124 (1) See Table C-1 for list of participating hotels. Source: Smith Travel Research Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;712712012;ema Total Month $92 $97 $98 $98 $98 $94 $101 $97 $95 $93 $91 96 $96 TABLE C-4 ESTIMATE OF FUTURE HOTEL ROOM NIGHT DEMAND, 2012-2022 - LOW JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Existing Demand for Occupied Rooms by Market Segment Estimated Market Segment Mix 2011 Tourism/Leisure 75.0% 243,534 Commercial/Corporate 15.0% 48,707 Meetings/Groups 10.0% 32,471 Total Existing Demand 100.0% 324,712 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Tourism/Leisure 7.0% annual rate of increase 261,000 279,000 299,000 320,000 342,000 366,000 392,000 419,000 448,000 479,000 513,000 Commercial/Corporate 6.0% annual rate of increase 52,000 55,000 58,000 61,000 65,000 69,000 73,000 77,000 82,000 87,000 92,000 Meetings/Groups 6.0% annual rate of increase 34 000 36 000 38 000 40 000 42 000 45 000 48 000 51 000 54 000 57 000 60 000 Subtotal, Demand 347,000 370,000 395,000 421,000 449,000 480,000 513,000 547,000 584,000 623,000 665,000 Annual Increase in Demand: Absolute 22,288 23,000 25,000 26,000 28,000 31,000 33,000 34,000 37,000 39,000 42,000 Percent 6.9% 6.6% 6.8% 6.6% 6.7% 6.9% 6.9% 6.6% 6.8% 6.7% 6.7% Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;7/27/2012;ema TABLE C-5 ESTIMATE OF FUTURE HOTEL ROOM NIGHT DEMAND, 2012-2022 - HIGH JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Existing Demand for Occupied Rooms by Market Segment Estimated Market Segment Mix 2011 Tourism/Leisure 75.0% 243,534 Commercial/Corporate 15.0% 48,707 Meetings/Groups 10.0% 32,471 Total Existing Demand 100.0% 324,712 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Tourism/Leisure 8.0% annual rate of increase 263,000 284,000 307,000 332,000 359,000 388,000 419,000 453,000 489,000 528,000 570,000 Commercial/Corporate 7.0% annual rate of increase 52,000 56,000 60,000 64,000 68,000 73,000 78,000 83,000 89,000 95,000 102,000 Meetings/Groups 7.0% annual rate of increase 35 000 37 000 40 000 43 000 46 000 49 000 52 000 56 000 60 000 64 000 68 000 Subtotal, Demand 350,000 377,000 407,000 439,000 473,000 510,000 549,000 592,000 638,000 687,000 740,000 Annual Increase in Demand: Absolute 25,288 27,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 37,000 39,000 43,000 46,000 49,000 53,000 Percent 7.8% 7.7% 8.0% 7.9% 7.7% 7.8% 7.6% 7.8% 7.8% 7.7% 7.7% Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;7/27/2012;ema TABLE C-6 PROJECTED HOTEL ROOM SUPPLY VS. DEMAND, 2012-2022 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA I. Low Scenario A. Estimated Room Night Demand 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 347,000 370,000 395,000 421,000 449,000 480,000 513,000 547,000 584,000 623,000 665,000 B. Estimated Supply of Hotel Room Nights 490,042 505,372 525,812 573,335 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 Add: Hotels PlannedlUnder Construction 15,330 (1) 20,440 (2) 47,523 (3) 55,955 (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal, Estimated Supply of Hotel Room Nights 505,372 525,812 573,335 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 C. Over/(Under) Supply of Hotel Room Demand 158,372 155,812 178,335 208,290 180,290 149,290 116,290 82,290 45,290 6,290 (35,711) D. Over/(Under) Supply of Rooms @ 70.0% Stablilized Occupancy 620 610 698 815 706 584 455 322 177 25 (140) (Less) Loss in Room Supply (5) (27) (55) (82) (109) (137) (164) (191) (218) (246) (273) (300) Adjusted Over/(Under) Supply of Hotel Rooms 593 555 616 706 569 421 264 104 (68) (248) (440) II. High Scenario A. Estimated Room Night Demand 350,000 377,000 407,000 439,000 473,000 510,000 549,000 592,000 638,000 687,000 740,000 B. Estimated Supply of Hotel Room Nights 490,042 505,372 525,812 573,335 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 Add: Hotels PlannedlUnder Construction 15,330 (1) 20,440 (2) 47,523 (3) 55,955 (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal, Estimated Supply of Hotel Room Nights 505,372 525,812 573,335 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 629,290 C. Over/(Under) Supply of Hotel Room Demand 155,372 148,812 166,335 190,290 156,290 119,290 80,290 37,290 (8,711) (57,711) (110,711) D. Over/(Under) Supply of Rooms @ 70.0% Stablilized Occupancy 608 582 651 745 612 467 314 146 (34) (226) (433) (Less) Loss in Room Supply (5) (27) (55) (82) (109) (137) (164) (191) (218) (246) (273) (300) Adjusted Over/(Under) Supply of Hotel Rooms 581 528 569 636 475 303 123 (72) (280) (499) (734) (1) Ponte Vineyard Inn expecting to open Spring 2012 (60 rooms). (2) Anticipated Crowne Plaza to be developed in City of Temecula (approximately 80 rooms). Exact opening date unknown. (3) Anticipated Hampton Inn to be developed in the City of Murrieta (approximately 106 rooms). Exact opening date unknown. (4) Anticipated Courtyard by Marriott to be developed in the City of Murrieta (approximately 219 rooms). Exact opening date unknown. (5) KMA estimate of rooms to be demolished or substantially rehabilitated over 10 years. Survey represents 50% of rooms built before 1990. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment,7/27!2012,ema TABLE C-7 SUMMARY OF HOTEL ROOM DEMAND, JEFFERSON STUDY AREA, THROUGH 2022 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA I. Hotel Room Demand through 2022 Undersupply of Hotel Rooms Jefferson Avenue Study Area Capture of Undersupply of Hotel Rooms @ Total Hotel Room Demand Low High 440 Rooms 30% '132 Rooms 734 Rooms 40 293 Rooms II. Total Hotel Room Demand through 2022 Average Annual Room Demand 132 Rooms 13 Rooms 293 Rooms 29 Rooms Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;7/27/2012;ema APPENDIX D Residential Market TABLE D-1 HOUSING INVENTORY TRENDS, TEMECULA/MURRIETA, 2000-2010 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA 2000 2010 Total % Mix Total % Mix I. Housing Units Single-family 27,638 81.2% 52,627 78.6% Multi -family 5,521 16.2% 12,647 18.9% Other (includes mobile homes) 861 2.5% 1,707 2.5% Total Units 34,020 100.0% 66,981 100.0% Change, 2000-2010 Average Total Annual 24,989 6.7% 7,126 8.6% 846 7.1% 32,961 7.0% II. Tenure Owner -occupied Renter -occupied Total Occupied Units 24,770 7,760 32,530 Source: California Department of Finance, U.S. Census Bureau Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment\7/27/2012;ema 76.1% 23.9% 100.0% 42,842 19,070 61,912 69.2% 30.8% 100.0% 18,072 11,310 29,382 5.6% 9.4% 6.6% TABLE D-2 SURVEY OF APARTMENT MARKET RENTS, TEMECULAIMURRIETA, 2012 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Com piex Somerset Apartments The Vineyards at Old Town Silverado Temecula Creek Villas Vista Pointe Acacia Park Resort Cape May at Harveston Sonoma at Mapleton The Hilltop at Winchester Creek Via Del Sol Sage Canyon Crescent Heights Eagle Glen Apartment Homes Mira Loma Apartments Portofino Apartments Tuscany Ridge Solana Ridge Gables Alta Murrieta Margarita Summit Summer Breeze Vintage View Apartments Sycamore Terrace Apartments Number Year Citi ( of Units Built Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula Murrieta Murrieta Temecula Temecula Murrieta Murrieta Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula Murrieta Temecula Temecula Temecula Temecula 318 274 492 180 144 320 300 193 175 48 344 184 320 114 344 220 312 180 143 125 220 225 N/A 2010 2007 2007 2007 2005 (1) 2005 2005 2005 2005 (2) 2004 (3) 2002 2002 2000 1999 1999 1998 1990 1989 1987 1987 1986 Average Rents by Bedroom Type One Bedroom Two Bedroom Unit Monthly Unit Monthly SF Rent RentISF SF Rent RentISF 841 747 $1,350 $1.81 € 1,389 679 $1,170 $1.72 942 853 $1,270 $1.49 € 1,125 722 $1,320 $1.83 € 1,041 720 $1,038 $1.44 1,035 720 $1,160 $1.61 € 1,173 781 $1,075 $1.38 1,055 813 $1,258 $1.55 1,364 913 $885 $0.97 993 869 761 $1,103 $1.45 € 1,060 898 $1,137 $1.27 € 1,114 850 $825 $0.97 990 787 $1,095 $1.39 940 766 $1,407 $1.84 1,041 766 $1,263 $1.65 € 1,041 710 $1,144 $1.61 € 1,019 1,011 1,004 672 $970 $1.44 892 725 $965 $1.33 1,067 $970 $1,883 $1,540 $1,698 $1,640 $1,288 $1,778 $1,347 $1,746 $1,010 $1,038 $1,335 $1,413 $900 $1,275 $1,611 $1,598 $1,334 $1,121 $1,169 $1,195 $1,162 $1.15 $1.36 $1.63 $1.51 $1.58 $1.24 $1.52 $1.28 $1.28 $1.02 $1.20 $1.26 $1.27 $0.91 $1.36 $1.55 $1.54 $1.31 $1.11 $1.16 $1.34 $1.09 .0..00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0.................0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0.1 Three Bedroom Unit Monthly SF Rent RentISF 1,331 $1,893 $1.42 1,278 1,815 $1.42 1,223 $1,868 $1.53 1,269 $1,740 $1.37 1,682 $2,001 $1.19 960 1,273 $1.33 1,454 $1,700 $1.17 1,363 $1,623 $1.19 1,170 $1,095 $0.94 1,217 $1,695 $1.39 1,320 $1,846 $1.40 1,320 $1,848 $1.40 1,279 $1,365 $1.07 Minimum Maximum Median Average (1) Originally built in 2000; remodeled in 2005. (2) Originally built in 1989; remodeled in 2005. (3) Originally built in 1986; remodeled in 2004. 48 492 220 235 Source: apartments.com; ForRent.com Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment1712712012;ema 1986 2010 2002 2000 672 $825 913 $1,407 764 $1,140 771 $1,135 $0.97 $1.84 $1.47 $1.49 841 $900 1,389 $1,883 1,038 $1,335 1,046 $1,366 $0.91 960 $1,095 $0.94 $1.63 € 1,682 $2,001 $1.53 $1.28 1,279 $1,740 $1.37 $1.30 € 1,297 $1,674 $1.29 TABLE D-3 APARTMENT COMPLEX SALES, TEMECULA/MURRIETA, 2007 THROUGH 1ST QUARTER 2012 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Date Sold Address Building Units Year Sales Price Acres SF ISF Total $/Unit Built 12/20/07 31037 Samantha Ln. Temecula $36,900,000 9.30 193,150 $191 180 $205,000 2007 02/01/11 41780 Butterfield Stage Rd. Temecula $27,150,000 19.45 146,000 $186 152 $178,618 1998 11/02/11 24405 Village Walk Place Murrieta $45,500,000 16.36 649,800 $70 260 $175,175 (1) 2010 11/30/11 24850 Hancock Ave. Murrieta $49,500,000 20.51 271,700 $182 420 $117,857 1990 12/23/11 40125 Los Alamos Rd. Murrieta $19,900,000 10.49 154,960 $128 200 $99,500 1989 07/20/11 24425 Skyview Ridge Dr. Murrieta $34,400,000 13.48 258,916 $133 396 $86,869 (1) 1991 Minimum $19,900,000 9.30 146,000 $70 152 $86,869 1989 Maximum $49,500,000 20.51 649,800 $191 420 $205,000 2010 Median $35,650,000 14.92 226,033 $158 230 $146,516 1995 Average $35,558,333 14.93 279,088 $148 268 $143,837 1998 (1) Senior apartment complex. Source: CoStar Group Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment18/2/2012; ema TABLE D-4 TRENDS IN MEDIAN HOME SALES PRICE, TEMECULA/MURRIETA, 2007-2012 (1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012(2) Temecula $381,250 $267,250 $270,000 $280,000 $294,000 $253,800 Murrieta $325,000 $248,900 $230,000 $240,500 $233,000 $182,500 Riverside County $351,500 $207,000 $195,000 $200,000 $194,000 $168,500 (1) Reflects median sales price of attached and detached homes. (2) As of April 2012. Source: Califomia Association of Realtors Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment17/27/2012:ema Average Annual Change TABLE D-5 NEW HOUSING UNITS, TEMECULAIMURRIETA AND JEFFERSON STUDY AREA, 2012-2022 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Projected Units Temecula! Annual Increase Murrieta Percent Absolute 12,647 (2) 12,647 0.0% 12,647 0.0% 13,026 3.0% 13,417 3.0% 13,820 3.0% 14,511 5.0% 15,236 5.0% 15,998 5.0% 17,278 8.0% 18,660 8.0% 20,153 8.0% 21,765 8.0% 0 0 379 391 403 691 726 762 1,280 1,382 1,493 1,612 Jefferson Avenue Study Area Capture of Projected Growth (1) Low Capture 15.0% 0 0 57 59 60 104 109 114 192 207 224 242 High Capture 25.0% 0 0 95 98 101 173 181 190 320 346 373 403 Total, 2012-2022 Average Annual 9,118 760 1,368 137 2,280 228 (1) KMA assumption. (2) See Table D-1. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;712712012;ema APPENDIX E Retail Market TABLE E-1 RETAIL SPACE MARKET FACTORS, TEMECULAIMURRIETA, 2007-2012 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (1) I. Temecula Rentable Area (SF) 4,917,897 4,546,324 4,546,324 3,678,953 4,657,419 4,657,419 Vacancy Rate 5.2% 4.6% 7.8% 11.7% 14.9% 13.4% Average Asking Lease Rate (2) $2.34 $1.92 $1.58 $1.44 $2.10 $1.43 Net Absorption YTD 172,813 3,791 (196,649) (108,720) 7,771 67,403 Change, 2007-2012 Averag e Absolute Annual (260,478) -1.1% 20.8% ($0.91) -9.4% II. Murrieta Rentable Area (SF) 3,183,473 3,454,857 3,507,785 3,337,007 4,280,005 4,280,005 Vacancy Rate 3.0% 5.9% 8.5% 8.7% 11.4% 12.7% Average Asking Lease Rate (2) $1.80 $2.38 $1.40 $2.07 $1.48 $1.44 Net Absorption YTD 462,521 222,078 (93,160) (19,965) (12,086) (57,489) III. Total Rentable Inventory - TemeculalMurrieta 8,101,370 8,001,181 8,054,109 7,015,960 8,937,424 8,937,424 (1) Based on 1st quarter data. (2) Per SF/month triple -net. Source: CB Richard Ellis Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment1712712012;ema 1,096,532 6.1% 33.5% ($0.36) -4.4% 836,054 2.0% TABLE E-2 RETAIL BUILDING SALES, 2009 THROUGH 1ST QUARTER 2012 (1) JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Date Sold Address 07/08/09 06/04/10 09/29/11 09/16/09 06/13/11 03/27/12 41841 Moreno Rd. 27300 Jefferson Ave. 41925 3rd St. 28030 Del Rio Rd. 41720 Winchester Rd. 27475 Jefferson Ave. 9/SF Sales Price Acres Land $1,450,000 $415,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,725,000 $2,464,000 Building Year SF ISF Built Property Description 0.77 $43 7,186 $202 N/A Restaurant building 0.45 $21 2,124 $195 1989 Restaurant building 0.16 $172 6,200 $194 1985 Freestanding retail building 1.60 $17 10,434 $115 1983 Religious facility 1.23 $32 16,302 $106 2005 Two-story retail building 2.73 $21 30,080 $82 1984 Former Stater Bros. building Minimum Maximum Median Average $415,000 $2,464,000 $1,325,000 $1,409,000 0.16 2.73 1.00 1.16 $17 $172 $27 $51 (1) Survey area represents the City of Temecula, west of Interstate 15. Excludes service stations. Source: CoStar Group Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment\7/27/2012; ema 2,124 30,080 8,810 12,054 $82 $202 $154 $149 1983 2005 1985 1989 TABLE E-3 10 -MILE TRADE AREA DEMAND PROJECTION, JEFFERSON STUDY AREA, 2012 THROUGH 2022 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Total Incremental Income, 2012-2022 $3,119,863,000 Low @ High 5.0% 7.5% Percent Capture in Study Area $155,993,000 $233,990,000 Income Allocation I. Trade Area Growth Generated Demand General Merchandise Other Comparison Good 8% Convenience Goods 8% Eating and Drinking 4% Home Improvement 3% 5% Assumed Capture Rate Low Hiah 20% 20% 50% 30% 20% Total Retail Goods/Services Captured in Study Area (Local and Visitor Supported Demand) II. Demand from Beyond the Trade Area Estimated Spending Low Hiah Sales Productivity Per SF Retail Space Demand (SF) Low Hiah 30% $350 4,000 10,000 30% $350 7,000 16,000 60% $400 16,000 28,000 40% $500 4,000 7,000 30% $500 2,000 4,000 Increased Demand 33,000 65,000 for Retail Space (1) 25.0% of Locally Supported Demand (2) $1,560,000 $2, 496, 000 $6,240, 000 $1, 872, 000 $936,000 $13,104,000 $3,510,000 $5,616,000 $11,232,000 $3,744,000 $2,106,000 $26,208,000 8.000 16.000 III. Total Local and Visitor Supported Demand through 2022 Average Annual Space Demand 41,000 81,000 4,100 8,100 (1) Does not reflect impact of a potential increase in sales capture by existing retail outlets. (2) Assumes that out-of-town visitors will provide 25% of additional demand. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment1712712012; em TABLE E-4 AGGREGATE HOUSEHOLD INCOME, INCREMENTAL NEW RESIDENTS, JEFFERSON STUDY AREA JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Rental For -Sale I. Number of Households Housing Housing Projected Residential Unit Absorption Thru 2022 912 (1) 912 (1) Average Occupancy Rate 97.5% 100.0% Number of Households 889 912 II. Required Annual Income Average Sales Price Down Payment 10.0% Interest Rate 6.0% Term (Years) 30 Monthly Payment Property Tax 1.00% of Value Insurance 0.25% of Value HOA Fees $300 /Month Monthly Payment Total Monthly Costs Income Allocation @ Minimum Income Required (Rounded) 33% $1,500 $1,500 $54,545 $55,000 $275,000 $247,500 $1,484 $229 $57 $300 $586 $2,070 $75, 285 $75,000 Aggregate Annual Household Income $48,896,000 $68,386,000 Aggregate Annual Household Income - Rental and For -Sale $117,282,000 (1) Reflects approximate mid -point between Low and High average residential absorption (see Table D-5. Absorption assumed to be split 50/50 between rental and for -sale housing. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessm ent;7/27/2012;em a TABLE E-5 RETAIL EXPENDITURES CAPTURED FROM INCREMENTAL NEW RESIDENTS, JEFFERSON STUDY AREA JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Annual Incremental Aggregate Household Income - New Residents $117,282,000 General Merchandise Other Comparison Goods Convenience Goods Eating and Drinking Home Improvement Income Assumed Capture Allocation Rate Estimated Spending Low High Low High 5% 20% 30% $1,173,000 $1,759,000 8% 20% 30% $1,877,000 $2,815,000 8% 50% 60% $4,691,000 $5,630,000 4% 30% 40% $1,407,000 $1,877,000 3% 20% 30% $704,000 $1,056,000 Sales Productivity Retail Space Per SF Demand (SF) $350 $350 $400 $500 $500 Low High 3,000 5,000 5,000 8,000 12,000 14,000 3,000 4,000 1.000 2.000 Total Retail Goods/Services from New Residents Captured in Study Area $9,852,000 $13,137,000 Average Annual Space Demand Increased Demand 24,000 33,000 for Retail Space(1) 2,400 3,300 (1) Does not reflect impact of a potential increase in sales capture by existing retail outlets. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment1712712012; em TABLE E-6 RETAIL DEMAND FROM NEW OFFICE WORKERS, JEFFERSON STUDY AREA JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Increase in Office Employment in Jefferson Avenue Study Area Estimate of Office Worker Spending per Year Total Annual Spending by New Office Workers Estimated Sales Productivity Per SF Low High 2,390 $6, 500 (1) $15,535,000 $400 3,585 $6,500 (1) $23,303,000 $400 I. Estimated Demand from Incremental Employment (2) 39,000 SF 58,000 SF Jefferson Avenue Study Area Capture @ 40.0% 50.0% II. Total Retail Space Demand Captured from New Office Workers through 2022 Average Annual Space Demand 15,600 SF 1,600 SF 29,000 SF 2,900 SF (1:Source: International Council of Shopping Centers, Office Worker Retail Spending, 2012. Reflects Office Worker spending, including those who spent nothing, and excluding transportation and online purchases. Assumes average expenditures for 50 weeks. Excludes demand from non -office workers, visitors, and residents from beyond trade area. (2; Does not reflect impact of a potential increase in sales capture by existing retail outlets. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment;7/27/2012;ema TABLE E-7 RETAIL DEMAND FROM NEW HOTEL ROOMS, JEFFERSON STUDY AREA JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA Number of Rooms Visitors per Room Occupancy Rate Number of Annual Visitors Low High 132 1.5 70 % 50,597 Retail Spending per Visitor (1) $146 Percent of Retail Sales Captured in Jefferson Avenue Study Area 30% Total Annual Retail Sales from New Hotel Room Visitors in Jefferson Study Area $2,218,000 Estimated Sales Productivity Per SF $400 293 1.5 70 % 112,462 $146 40 % $6,572,000 $400 Total Estimated Demand from New Hotel Room Visitors through 2022 (2) Average Annual Space Demand 61,000 SF 6,100 SF 181,000 SF 18,100 SF (1) Based on data as provided in the Temecula Valley Travel Impacts 2000-2010. The study finds that Hotel/Motel visitors spend $240/day/person, inclusive of accommodations. KMA has deducted the 2010 Average Daily Rate (ADR) of $93.30 from the Smith Travel Research analysis in order to reflect only commodity spending. Does not include transportation -related spending. (2) Does not reflect impact of a potential increase in sales capture by existing retail outlets. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment\7/27/2012; ema TABLE E-8 SUMMARY OF RETAIL SPACE DEMAND, JEFFERSON STUDY AREA, THROUGH 2022 JEFFERSON AVENUE STUDY AREA MARKET ASSESSMENT CITY OF TEMECULA I. Estimated Retail Space Demand 10 -Mile Trade Area Demand (Table E-3) New Residents (Table E-5) New Office Workers (Table E-6) New Hotel Visitors (Table E-7) Low High 41,000 SF 24,000 SF 15,600 SF 61.000 SF 81,000 SF 33,000 SF 29,000 SF 181.000 SF II. Total Retail Space Demand in Study Area through 2022 Average Annual Space Demand 141,600 SF 14,200 SF 324,000 SF 32,400 SF Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Jefferson Study Area Market Assessment:7/27/2012:ema Item No. 16 Approvals City Attorney Chief Financial Officer City Manager 07 -e -r - CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, Executive Director of Community Services DATE: August 14, 2012 SUBJECT: Special Needs Update (at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Mike Naggar) PREPARED BY: Yvette Martinez, Inclusion Services Specialist RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: The Temecula City Council has recognized that youth with special needs and their families have unique and complex issues that are not easily addressed. Through a community based process the City Council directed the Community Services Department to prepare an addendum to the adopted youth master plan that focuses on youth with special needs. The Human Services Division has taken the strategic direction of the Youth Master Plan Addendum on taking actions focused on addressing the needs of all youth including those with special needs. This process has included community education, volunteerism, training, public-private partnerships, resources and programs and services. Several recent programs have been introduced to the City of Temecula including: Resource Guide: The Special Needs Resource Guide is a new and innovative tool that connects parents, caregivers, and individuals affected by disabilities to local services and resources. It includes a comprehensive list of resources that are located throughout Southwest County. Many city officials, including Mayor Pro Tem Mike Naggar, believe that this guide is the important first step in making sure those going through a critical time in their lives receive the help they need. The first edition of the Resource Guide was released on Tuesday, July 10th, and a tentative update for the guide is scheduled for October 10th, 2012 at quarterly intervals. The guide is available on the City of Temecula website and/or available in print by request. Green Acres SKIP: The SKIP (Supporting Kids Involving Parents) meeting for the month of July was held at Green Acres Ranch in Temecula. During this meeting, the staff at the ranch provided a complimentary learning enrichment session in which children and their families were able to tour the ranch and learn about different animals. The children interacted with chickens, goats, and horses, learned about feeding the animals, and participated in a hands-on learning session with farm equipment. A certified hypnotherapist also provided information to the parents on interactive therapy and healing services offered by their facility while the children interacted with YAC (Youth Advisory Council) members. Afterwards, the group was introduced to Dr. Kurtain the director of the Sadler Center for Quality at Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego as well as the founder and medical director of "Our Place", a wellness center and spa for children and adults with disabilities. Dr. Kurtain donated his time to speak to the parents about medical awareness and yoga practices for children and adults with special needs. He will also be returning to provide a free class to children and parents at our next SKIP meeting. The meeting concluded with a meal for attendees that included a sandwich, chips, apple slices, and a cookie, which was provided by Subway that was free of charge for children. The event was well attended with over 75 people including children, parents, siblings, and grandparents. The outpouring of support from our community has been tremendously positive. Inclusive Internship Program: In collaboration with Charles Walker in Economic Development, the Human Services Division has made the Internship program inclusive to all individuals including those with special needs. Providing an opportunity for integration allows for individuals to have the same quality of life as others, provides for learning, raises awareness, and promotes sensitivity and diversity in the workplace. In addition, the human services division has partnered with TMI, Inc (Towards Maximum Independence) to create and promote volunteerism opportunities for individuals with special needs. This partnership among private organizations will improve coordination, bridge gaps in services, and leverage resource opportunities to the City of Temecula. These opportunities will also help individuals with special needs with job skills, training and development. Resource Fair: On August 11, 2012, the City of Temecula in partnership with Neighborhood Healthcare, Inland Regional Center and Our Nicholas Foundation held its first Annual Special Needs Community Resource and Wellness Fair. Over fifty agencies in attendances and over 200 people attended including children and family from surrounding communities. The fair provided information on resources, products and services available to families and caregivers of special needs children and adults. The fair also serves as a great networking opportunity for professionals in the community to connect with other agencies/organizations. There were fun and exciting raffle prizes donated by agencies, as well as complimentary blood pressure checks, dental screenings, glucose tests, low vision assessments and interactive drum therapy demonstrations. Area Board 12 Presentation: On September 13, 2012 from 4:00 pm — 8:00 pm, State Council on Developmental Disabilities Area Board 12 in collaboration with the City of Temecula will be hosting a citywide staff training called "Ages and Stages". This training will give city staff an opportunity to learn about the developmental milestones of children with special needs. It is designed to give insight and resources for child caregivers regarding what to look for if a child may have a special need and/or developmental delay. The objective of the training will raise awareness and promote inclusion to all recreational staff working with children and families. The second part of the training will be an IEP/IPP workshop to all parents/caregivers in the community. This particular training is designed to assist individuals, parents/families with active IEP/IPP to come and talk with an advocate regarding questions or problems they are having with service delivery or any other related issues. Literature and material on "tips" will be provided for IEP/IPP meetings. Parents/Families will have the opportunity to learn about the IEP process, their rights, and strategies on developing the IEP. The workshop will allow for parents/caregivers to bring in their IEP and get direction and questions answered by trained professionals. Upcoming Autism Task Force Meeting: The next Southwest Riverside Autism Task Force Meeting is set for September 26, 2012 from 3:00 — 5:00 pm at the Riverside Board Chambers in downtown Riverside. All autism task force elected officials have confirmed their attendance. Primary items for discussion will include the recently completed Resource Guide as well as a presentation on the Southwest Riverside Autism Playbook will be a comprehensive guide that is intended to provide a model and road map on how the Community's regional efforts come together to address the growing need to provide services and programs to youth and families affected by autism and/or special needs. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None