Loading...
022312 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk's Department at 951-694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] MEETING AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD AT TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, February 23, 2012, 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner ROLL CALL: Carter, Cosentino, Coram, Youmans, Hagel PRESENTATIONS: Captain Ernie Sanchez, California Highway Patrol Introduction of Problem Oriented Police (POP) Team PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of fifteen minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Any public writings distributed by the City Staff to at least a majority of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding any item on this regular meeting agenda will be made available at the City Clerk's Office at Temecula Civic Center, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92589, during normal business hours. COMMISSION REPORTS Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. 1 COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Action Minutes of January 26, 2012 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of January 26, 2012. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Request for Multi -Way Stop Signs — Roripaugh Road RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Deny the request for Multi -Way Stop Signs on Roripaugh Road; 2.2 Direct Staff to schedule a workshop with the residents of Roripaugh Hills to discuss and develop potential neighborhood traffic calming alternatives; and 2.3 Direct Staff to schedule this item for further consideration at a future Commission meeting. 3. School Area Traffic Safety Workshop — Area 1, Redhawk Elementary School and Jackson Elementary School RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the report. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORTS POLICE CHIEF'S REPORTS FIRE CHIEF'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, March 22, 2012, at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at Main Reception, Temecula Civic Center, (41000 Main Street, Temecula) or the Temecula Library (30600 Pauba Road, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website— www.citvoftemecula.org Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review at the Main Reception, Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula— 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website —www.citvoftemecula.org—and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please contact City Clerk's Department — 951-694-6444. 2 ITEM NO. 1 Action Minutes of January 26, 2011 ACTION MINUTES OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, January 26, 2011 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Youmans ROLL CALL: Carter, Coram, Cosentino, Youmans, Hagel PRESENTATIONS: Teen Injury Prevention Fair Maureen Bowlin, Trauma Program Manager Inland Valley Medical Center PUBLIC COMMENTS Matt Kwiatkowski addressed the commission. COMMISSION REPORTS COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Action Minutes of October 27, 2011 - Approved staff recommendation — (2-0-3) — Commissioner Youmans made the motion; it was seconded by Commissioner Hagel; and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioners Carter, Coram and Cosentino who abstained. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of October 27, 2011. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Election of Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson — Appointed Chairperson Hagel to serve another year as Chairperson — (5-0-0) — Commissioner Youmans made the motion; it was seconded by Commissioner Carter and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Appointed Commissioner Youmans to serve another year as Vice Chairperson — (5-0- 0) — Commissioner Hagel made the motion; it was seconded by Commissioner Carter and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Recommend that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission entertain nominations to elect a Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson to preside through the 2012 calendar year, 3. School Area Traffic Safety Workshop — Area 1, Earle Stanley Gardner Middle School and Luiseno Elementary School — received and filed the report. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the report. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORTS POLICE CHIEF'S REPORTS FIRE CHIEF'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT At 7:42 P.M., Commissioner Youmans moved, seconded by Commissioner Carter, to adjourn the Public Traffic Safety Commission meeting to Thursday, February 23, 2012, at 6:00 PM. Bob Hagel Chairperson Greg Butler Director of Public Works / City Engineer 2 ITEM NO. 2 Request for Multi -Way Stop Signs — Roripaugh Road TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission reg Butler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 23, 2012 Item 2 Request for Multi -Way Stop Signs — Roripaugh Road Prepared By: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer — Traffic RECOMMENDATION: 1. Deny the request for Multi -Way Stop Signs on Roripaugh Road; 2. Direct Staff to schedule a workshop with the residents of Roripaugh Hills to discuss and develop potential neighborhood traffic calming alternatives; and 3. Direct Staff to schedule this item for further consideration at a future Commission meeting. BACKGROUND: Staff received a request from the residents of Roripaugh Hills, to consider the feasibility of installing multi -way stop signs at various intersections along Roripaugh Road to reduce vehicular speeds and provide right-of-way control. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process and by mail. In the past, Staff has received numerous requests to consider multi -way stop signs along Roripaugh Road in an effort to reduce vehicular speeds and volumes in the Roripaugh Hills neighborhood. The previous requests have been consistently denied because the conditions and volumes at the intersections studied have not satisfied the suggested multi -way stop warrant criteria shown in the California, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD). The previous intersections studied along Roripaugh Road include Starling Street, Senna Court, and Swallow Court. Roripaugh Road is a forty-four (44) foot wide residential collector roadway, which provides access to the arterial roadway network for numerous single family residential enclaves. Currently, Roripaugh Road carries 3,300 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) south of Winchester Road and 2,900 ADT west of Senna Court. The speed limit is posted at 25 MPH between Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. Starling Street is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway, which provides access for numerous single family residential units to Roripaugh Road. Starling Street carries 300 ADT east of Roripaugh Road. The prima facie speed limit on Starling Street is 25 MPH. Sanderling Way is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway, which provides access for numerous single family residential units to Roripaugh Road. Sanderling Way carries 260 ADT south of Roripaugh Road. The prima facie speed limit on Sanderling Way is 25 MPH. Swallow Court is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway, which provides access for numerous single family residential units to Roripaugh Road. Swallow Court carries 130 ADT north of Roripaugh Road. The prima facie speed limit on Swallow Court is 25 MPH. Senna Court is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway, which provides access for numerous single family residential units to Roripaugh Road. Senna Court carries 140 ADT north of Roripaugh Road. The prima facie speed limit on Senna Court is 25 MPH. In February 2012, a review of conditions was performed on Roripaugh Road at Starling Street, Senna Court, Swallow Court, and Sanderling Way. The review included an evaluation of sight distance, collision history, school age pedestrian counts, and completion of a multi -way stop warrant analysis. The sight distance evaluation revealed the following: • Roripaugh Road at Starling Street The sight distance visibility at this intersection exceeds the minimum sight distance required for conditions and prevailing speeds. The results of the evaluation indicate the sight distance is approximately 360 feet looking north and 250 feet looking south from the east leg of Starling Street. The sight distance on the west leg of Starling Street is approximately 216 feet looking north and approximately 250 feet looking south. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of approximately 155 feet is required for the 25 MPH posted speed limit. • Roripaugh Road and Sanderling Way The sight distance visibility at this intersection exceeds the minimum sight distance required for conditions and prevailing speeds. The results of the evaluation determined the sight distance is approximately 200 feet looking west and 250 feet looking east from Sanderling Way. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of approximately 155 feet is required for the 25 MPH posted speed limit. • Roripaugh Road and Swallow Court The sight distance visibility at this intersection exceeds the minimum sight distance required for conditions and prevailing speeds. The results of the evaluation indicate the sight distance is approximately 270 feet looking east and 200 feet looking west from the north leg of Swallow Court. The sight distance on the south leg of Swallow Court is approximately 200 feet looking east and 500 feet looking west. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of approximately 155 feet is required for the 25 MPH posted speed limit. • Roripaugh Road and Senna Court The sight distance visibility at this intersection meets/exceeds the minimum sight distance required for conditions and prevailing speeds. The results of the evaluation indicate the sight distance is approximately 250 feet looking east and 250 feet looking west from the north leg of Senna Court. The sight distance on the south leg of Senna Court is approximately 300 feet looking west and 155 feet looking east. The sight distance looking east can be improved beyond 155 feet by trimming/removing the vegetation on the southeast corner of the intersection. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of approximately 155 feet is required for the 25 MPH posted speed limit. 2 A review of the collision history for the twelve (12) month period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, indicates there were no reported collisions at any of the intersections studied. In fact, a review of the roadway segment collision history for the same twelve (12) month period revealed there were no reported collisions on Roripaugh Road between Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. This favorable record can be attributed to driver familiarity with roadway conditions and exercising due care when traveling through the neighborhood. The Multi -Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets' warrant criteria was used to evaluate the need for multi -way stop signs at the four (4) intersections on Roripaugh Road. The warrants allow for the installation of multi -way stop signs when the following conditions are satisfied: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is equal to or greater than three -hundred (300) vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day and b) The combined vehicular volume and pedestrian volume from the minor street is equal to or greater than one -hundred (100) per hour for the same eight (8) hours. 2. Collision History a) Three (3) or more reported collisions within a twelve (12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left -turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Roadway Characteristics a) The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles per day, b) The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs; c) The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split; and d) Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. WARRANTS 1, 2, and 3 MUST BE SATISFIED Other criteria that may be considered when evaluating the need for multi -way stop signs include: 4. Visibility a) The intersections sight distance is less than: • 155 feet for 25 MPH • 200 feet for 30 MPH • 250 feet for 35 MPH 5. The need to control left -turn conflicts. 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route to School plan. 8. There are no traffic signal or all -way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. 9. The installation of multi -way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs for the residential area. 3 The Multi -Way Stop warrant analysis at the four (4) intersections along Roripaugh Road found that Warrants 1, 2, and 3 are not satisfied and multi -way stop signs are not justified at any of the four (4) locations. Moreover, an evaluation of the optional criteria, such as intersection sight distance, Indicates there are no special circumstances that would justify the need for right-of-way control provided by multi -way stop signs. Based on the results of the evaluation, staff recommends denial of the request for multi -way stop signs on Roripaugh Road. Over the years, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission has considered similar requests to install multi -way stop signs to control vehicular speeds on roadways that function as a residential collector. The Commission has consistently upheld Staff's opinion that multi -way stop signs should not be used to reduce vehicular speeds or volumes on a roadway. Past studies have proven that multi -way stop signs are ineffective at reducing vehicular speeds or volumes and should be installed only to regulate traffic flow and improve safety. The Residential Multi -Way Stop Sign Policy is just one of the many tools available in the City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (NTCP), which addresses traffic conditions on residential streets. Since the four (4) intersections did not satisfy the minimum warrant criteria for multi -way stop signs, other potential NTCP tools such as striping to narrow the roadway, "V -Calm" radar speed display sign, and speed fine placards should be considered as possible alternatives to address vehicular speeding concerns on Roripaugh Road. Staff recommends the Commission direct staff to schedule a workshop the residents of Roripaugh Hills to discuss and develop potential neighborhood traffic calming alternatives and schedule this item for further consideration at a future Commission meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts associated with staff recommendation. Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" — Multi -Way Stop Warrant Analysis 4 EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP THE 1:IT1 1W -moi TEMECULA Request for Multi -Way Stop Signs - Roripaugh Road 0 600 1200 1800 ft. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. Map center: 6289311, 2139399 Legend City ,/ Streets Parcels Aerial 2011 Scale: 1:6,024 EXHIBIT "B" MULTI -WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS Major Street: Minor Street: MULTI -WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Roripaugh Road Starling Street Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied 1. Minimum Vehicular Volume MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Satisfied 7-8 AM 8-9 AM 1-2 PM 1 2-3 PM 3-4 PM Yes No X 4-5 PM 5-6 PM 6-7 PM Hour 'Total All Approaches 300 386 193 195 288 295 331 350 254 Combined Vehicular Ped Volume (Minor Street) 100 35 19 19 22 19 18 24 18 2. Collision History MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 3 OR MORE 0 3. Roadway Characteristics (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) Satisfied Satisfied Yes No Yes No A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles Yes per day, B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, Yes C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split, and Yes D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. Yes Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) 4. Visibility The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet for 25 MPH 200 feet for 30 MPH 250 feet for 35 MPH 5. The need to control left -turn conflicts. Yes Yes 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. Yes 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. Yes 8. There are no traffic signal or all -way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. Yes 9. The installation of multi -way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. Yes X X X No No No No Satisfied X X No No No No No No X X X X X X X Major Street: Minor Street: MULTI -WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Roripaugh Road Sanderling Way Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied 1. Minimum Vehicular Volume MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 7-8 AM 8-9 AM 1-2 PM Satisfied Yes No X 2-3 PM 3-4 PM 4-5 PM 5-6 PM 6-7 PM Hour Total All Approaches 300 362 184 186 281 285 327 340 297 Combined Vehicular Ped Volume (Minor Street) 100 36 22 10 40 22 18 18 15 2. Collision History MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 3 OR MORE 0 3. Roadway Characteristics (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles per day, Satisfied Yes Satisfied Yes No No Yes X No B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, Yes C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split, and Yes D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. Yes Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) 4. Visibility The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet for 25 MPH 200 feet for 30 MPH 250 feet for 35 MPH X No No No Satisfied Yes No 5. The need to control left -turn conflicts. Yes 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. Yes 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. 8. There are no traffic signal or all -way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. Yes Yes 9. The installation of multi -way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. Yes X X X No No No No No X X X X X X X Major Street: Minor Street: MULTI -WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Roripaugh Road Swallow Court Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied 1. Minimum Vehicular Volume Satisfied Yes No X MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 7-8 AM 8-9 AM 1-2 PM 1 2-3 PM 1 3-4 PM 1 4-5 PM 5-6 PM 1 6-7 PM Hour Total All Approaches 300 379 181 159 300 279 293 287 203 Combined Vehicular Ped Volume (Minor Street) 100 10 8 8 10 11 16 8 9 2. Collision History MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 3 OR MORE 0 3. Roadway Characteristics (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) Satisfied Satisfied Yes No Yes No A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles Yes per day, B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, Yes C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split, and Yes D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. Yes Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) 4. Visibility The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet far 25 MPH 200 feet for 30 MPH 250 feet for 35 MPH X X X No No No No Satisfied Yes No 5. The need to control left -turn conflicts. Yes 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. Yes 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. Yes 8. There are no traffic signal or all -way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. Yes 9. The installation of multi -way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. Yes X No No No No No X X X X X X X X Major Street: Minor Street: MULTI -WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Roripaugh Road Senna Court Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied 1. Minimum Vehicular Volume MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Satisfied Yes No X 7-8 AM 8-9 AM 1-2 PM 1 2-3 PM 3-4 PM 4-5 PM 5-6 PM 6-7 PM Hour Total All Approaches 300 380 183 161 305 277 291 293 205 Combined Vehicular Ped Volume (Minor Street) 100 11 10 10 15 9 14 14 11 2. Collision History MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 3 OR MORE 0 3. Roadway Characteristics (AII Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) Satisfied Yes Satisfied Yes A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles Yes per day, B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, Yes C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split, and Yes D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. Yes Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) 4. Visibility The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet for 25 MPH 200 feet for 30 MPH 250 feet for 35 MPH Yes 5. The need to control left -turn conflicts. Yes 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. Yes 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. Yes 8. There are no traffic signal or all -way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. Yes 9. The installation of multi -way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. Yes X X X No No No No No No Satisfied X No No No No No No X X X X X X X X ITEM NO. 3 School Area Traffic Safety Workshop Area 1 Redhawk Elementary School and Jackson Elementary School AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: fjreg Butler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 23, 2012 SUBJECT: Item 3 School Area Traffic Safety Workshop — Area 1, Redhawk Elementary School and Jackson Elementary School Prepared By: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the report. BACKGROUND: At the meeting of September 13, 2011, the City Council directed Staff to review traffic safety at each school site within Temecula Valley Unified School District's (TVUSD) jurisdiction and conduct a workshop with all stakeholders including TVUSD administrators, school site administrators, Temecula Police Department, and parents. Staff will provide a brief presentation of school area traffic conditions at Redhawk Elementary School and Jackson Elementary School. FISCAL IMPACT: None. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Supervise DATE: February 6, 2011 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - January, 2012 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of January, 2012: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 27 B. Total signs installed 0 C. Total signs repaired 74 D. Banners Replaced 94 E. Christmas Wreaths 48 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 119 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 4,287 B. Total Tons 91 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 129 B. Down Spouts 0 C. Under sidewalks 0 D. Bowls 14 E. Channels 1 V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. 244 New and repainted legends B. 0 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 0 Bull Nose D. 0 Thermal Plastic E. 0 RPMs Installed 0 117 4,847 R UTAINTAIMMOACTRPT Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 51 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 47 service order requests for the month of December, 2011. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 55.5 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of January, 2012 was $64,192.00 compared to $15,308.00 for the month of December, 2011. Account No. 5402 $ 64,192.00 Account No. 5401 $ - 0 - Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - Electronic Copies: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Maya De La Torre, Senior Engineer Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer Capital Improvements - Land Development - Traffic Division RIMAMTAINUWACTRPT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED FISCAL YEAR 2011 - 2012 Date Submitted: Submitted By: Prepared By: 07 -Feb -12 GREG BUTLER RODNEY TIDWELL :._ .. �>..,, ytt,�a.FaRTr CONTRACTORS- - JANUARY F,FEBRUARYpMARCHt`, APRIL_. '-*r•,MAY rr ,JUNE „ 9,�2NDHA0JTOTALSYEAR=TO=DATE; Asphalt Square Feet 0 Concrete Square Feet 0 Drainage Channels 0 TOTAL COSTS $0.00 0 0 0 $0.00 0 0 0 $104,946.00 CONTRACT STRIPING Striping Linear Feet 0 - 0 0 Sandblasting Linear Feet - 0 0 0 TOTAL COSTS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TREE CONTRACTORS Frees trimmed 611 611 611 Trees Removed 6 6 6 TOTAL COSTS $32,102.00 $32,102.00 $32,102.00 R.O.W. SPRAYING 0 Square Feet 520,000 520,000 520,000 TOTAL COSTS $28,725.00 $28,725.00 $41,708.00 CITY MAINTENANCE CREW Banners 94 94 673 Signs Replaced 27 27 471 Signs Installed 0 0 954 Signs Repaired 74 74 654 Catch Basins Cleaned 143 143 1,483 Trees Trimmed 119 119 737 R.O.W. Weed Abatement 0 0 45,660 New & Repainted Legends 244 244 2,032 After Hours Call Outs 56 56 817 Service Order Requests 51 51 399 Graffiti Removal - Sq Ft 4,847 4 847 26,480 TOTAL COSTS $25,858.34 _ $25,858.34 $ 510,786.20 RIMINTAIN ORK In JAN TO JUNE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT STREET MAINTENANCE FISCAL YEAR 2011 - 2012 Date Submitted: Submitted By: Prepared By: February 7, 2012 Greg Butler Rodney Tidwell W iSCOPE OF.ORK3,1 tSsa WORK COMPLETED JAN. '12 ;r WORK - WORK) COST FOR FEB. ., COMPLETED COST FOR -FEB. COMPLETED COST FORS ;'THIS '12 '. FEB,'12' ., ,.'12 ::;- .,.,MARCH�12 , MARCHo12�^1.. TOTAL COSTTOR FISCAL a ;.� .,,;, YEAR;<., TOTAL'COST FOR LAST+FISCAL"° fr -'NEAR, ASPHALT AC Square Footage: 4,287 $12,732:39 $70,362.27 $95,917.63 Tons: 91 - $0.00 $0.00 SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER REPAIR Square Footage: 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PCC Yards: 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 STRIPING LINEAR FEET: 0 $0.00 $545.65 $6,242.18 IN-HOUSE PAINTING LEGENDS: 244 $1,952.00 $16,984.00 $27,488.00 SIGNS REPLACED Material: 27 $1,350.00 $23,450.00 $41,500.00 Labor: 0 $712.53 $12,376.91 $21,903.37 SIGNS INSTALLED Material: 0 $0.00 $8,700.00 $5,100.00 Labor: 0 $0.00 $4,59t86 $2,691.78 SIGNS REPAIRED Material: 74 $3,700.00 $16,500.00 $39,486.50 Labor: $1,952.86 $17,258.86 $15,965.95 GRAFFITI Square Footage: 4,847 DRAINAGE CHANNELS CLEANED Basins: 143 $3,773.77 $39,136.37 $69,854.33 Channels: 1 $0.00 $65,150.00 $177,505.50 IN-HOUSE TREES TRIMMED: 119 $3,140.41 $14,593.67 $26,812.24 SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS: 51 AFTER HOURS CALL OUTS: 56 $2,197.24 $32,315.34 $48,200.99 R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT: 0 $2,332.84 TOTALS $31,511.20 $323,544.57 5581,001.31 R:\MAI NTAIN\MOACTRPT\STREETMAI NTUAN.FEB.MAR.\07-08 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have Performed the following Projects for the month of January, 2012 DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT Date: 12.21.11 # 5402 CITYWIDE APPLICATION OF PRE & POST EMERGENT ALONG OPEN R.O.W. TOTAL COST $ 19,975.00 Date: 03.31.12 # 5402 CITYWIDE APPLICATION OF PRE & POST EMERGENT ALONG MAJOR ARTERIALS TOTAL COST $ 8,750.00 Date: # TOTAL COST Date: # TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. Date: 01.03.12 # 5402 CITYWIDE ANNUAL TREE TRIMMING PROGRAM TOTAL COST S 32,102.00 Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: BECKER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. Date: 01.17.12 # 5402 YNEZ ROAD AT DATE STREET REPAIR DAMAGED GUARD RAIL TOTAL COST $ 3,365.00 Date: # TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 64,192.00 ft:MAINTAIN \MOACTRPT SQUARE: FOOTAGE January February March April May June July August September October November December 4,847 CITY OF TEMECULA 2012 GRAFFITI REMOVAL TOTAL CALLS January February March April May June July August September October November December 117 51000 49000 47000 45000 43000 41000 39000 37000 35000 33000 31000 29000 27000 25000 23000 21000 19000 17000 15000 13000 11000 9000 7000 5000 3000 1000 DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV Totals for the Year. To Date: -FEB 1 , 2012: Sq. Foot Calls 4;847 117 -a- SQ FT N\MAINfENINCE\GI Afflll\GralIii Clun.12 J1lOdZ2I S AAIH3 ZZIrIOd RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 4.1 SOUTHWEST STATION CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT qui r-c!;Ar.. . To: Capt. O'Harra Lt. Madden Sgt. Leggett Cc: Sgt. Mc Donald Sgt. Lee Fm: Marianna Davis, Crime Analyst Date: February 3, 2012 Re: Part 1 Crime for the City of Temecula January 1 - 31 2011 In response to your request to provide information in regards to Part 1 Crimes for the above time frame, I found the following: Part 1 Calls for Service: 205 CRIME Total Homicide 0 A. •ravated Assault 14 Arson 0 Bu !la 40 _Larcen !Theft* 128 Ra.e 5 Robbe 4 Veh Theft 14 Grand Total 205 UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category. This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category. Data was obtained using Data warehouse. If you need any additional assistance in regards to this request, please do not hesitate to ask. Thanks. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SOUTHWEST STATION CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT SHERIFF CORONER STANLEY SNIFF 30)55-4 AULD ROAD, MURRIETA, CA 92563 To: Capt. O'Harra Lt. Madden Sgt. Leggett Cc: Sgt. Mc Donald Sgt. Lee Fm: Marianna Davis, Crime Analyst Date: February 3, 2012 Re: Part 1 Crime for the City of Temecula January 1 - 31 2011 In response to your request to provide information in regards to Part 1 Crimes for the above time frame, I found the following: Part 1 Calls for Service: 205 CRIME Total Homicide 0 Aggravated Assault 14 Arson 0 Burglary 40 Larceny/Theft* 128 Rape 5 Robbery 4 Veh Theft 14 Grand Total 205 * UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category. This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category. Data was obtained using Data warehouse. If you need any additional assistance in regards to this request, please do not hesitate to ask. Thanks. January 2012 Citations Totals Total Hazardous Citations 1000 Total Non -Hazardous Citations 379 Parking Citations 229 Total Citations 1608 Citation Breakdown S. L.A. P. 142 N.E.T. Citations 90 School Zones 50 Seatbelt Citations 24 Community Presentations 0 Traffic Collisions Non -Injury 15 Hit and Run 10 Injury 32 Fatal 0 Total 57 Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting in a written Police report. D. U.l. Arrests D.U.I. Arrests 28 Cell Phone Cites Total cell phone cites (23123 & 23124 CVC) 117 Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints / Click it or Ticket Operations Commission Members City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 February 23, 2012 Ref: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Division Activities/Events Dear Commission Members; Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of January, 2012. These activities include the following: • Citation statistics (attachment) • Community Action Patrol supported call -outs: None. • Community Action Patrol activity / patrol hours: 952 hours for January, 2012. Year-to-date total, 952 hours. **Included for January were 20 patrols with 31 CAP members participating, coupled with security monitoring / patrols at Promenade Mall, 5 nights, 1 CAP member participating** • Special Events for January, 2012: January 12, 2012, Regular CAP Meeting. • Radar Trailer Deployments: January 3 — 5, 2012 — Nicolas @ Alexandria — 13,498 vehicles. January 9 —12, 2012 — Winchester @ Margarita Meadows — 23,296 vehicles. January 9 —12, 2012 — Margarita @ San Fermin — 19,293 vehicles. January 16 — 18, 2012 — Sunny Meadows @ Bingham — 3,354 vehicles. January 23 — 25, 2012 — Jefferson @ Buecking —18,974 vehicles. If you have any questions regarding this package, please do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula Police Department - (951) 696- 3042 Sincerely, Sergeant Mark Leggett Temecula Police Department Traffic Division illOdZ2i S S3IHD taHiti Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics 0100011 r "Ir CAL FIRE SINCE 1885 CA o 4 o -4 \/ John R. Hawkins Fire Chief 2/8/2012 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIS Section Incidents Reported for the month of January,2012 and TEMECULA City Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics John R. Hawkins Fire Chief 2/8/2012 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIS Section Incidents Reported for the month of January,2012 and TEMECULA City Response Activity Incidents Reported for the month of )anuary,2012 and TEMECULA City False Alarm Medical Multi-Fam Dwelling Fire Other Fire Other Misc Public Service Assist Res Fire Standby Traffic Collision Vehicle Fire ■ Medical 436 69.6% False Alarm 68 10.9% • Traffic Collision 66 10.5% ■ Public Seruce Assist 35 5.6% • Standby 11 1.8% Other Fire 4 0.6% • Multi-Fam Dwelling Fire 2 0.3% Vehicle Fire 2 0.3% • Other Misc 1 0.2% • Res Fire 1 0.2% Total: 626 100.0% 68 436 2 4 1 35 1 11 66 2 Incident Total: Response Time= 626 <5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average % 0 to 5 min 475 93 9 2 3.9 82.0% `Excludes non emergency response times Page 2 of 5 Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction False Medial Multi-Fam Other Fire Other Public Res Fire Standby Traffic Vehicle Alarm Dwelling Misc Service Collision Fire Special District Battalion 15 Battalion Total 0 3 6 1 Battalion Total Grand Total Page 3 of 5 Incidents by Jurisdiction Fat Medical Multi-Fam Other Fire Other Misc Public Res Fire Standby Traffic Vehicle Alarm Dwelling Service Collision Fire iy of Temecula Page 4 of 5 Incidents by Supervisorial District - Summary DISTRICT 1 BOB DISTRICT 3 JEFF BUSTER STONE False Alarm Medical Multi-Fam Dwelling Fire Other Fire Other Misc Public Service Assist Res Fire Standby Traffic Collision Vehicle Fire 1 67 o 436 o 2 o 4 0 1 o 35 o 1 o 11 o 66 0 2 Page 5 of 5 2011 CITY OF TEMECULA EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND TRAINING REPORT PUBLIC SAFETY CLASS TOTALS 2012 Class Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Oct Nov Dec Total _ v=56 .f ", -. � t._ _ �CPR/AED._ FIRST AID 36 68 Haiafdoii .Material .. -_ __ _.. _ 36 P.EDIATRIQFIRST'AID_: ,. _.. _ � `_- - _ . _ �� �. , �. .. .- ^> �, .*. ' -., :.0_._. .. ... _ -.._0.:'_. SCHOOL CPR 436 Multi -Family Dwellui9_ '‘;. __~- .. '2 t,.-: _z. 0 SCHOOLEIRST AIDrr._-: �. _ _:.': .. ':_,. '. :... .. -�. . -. ..^_�..". �. ' r' ... STAFF HCP 19 4 OtheuMissc:_ _.__-.__:_� = _ _.. tt =off _ _ ._ o .- 19 HCP_.'-__. ____.' .-.'_9;..,'._._.. - <... _ _,... .... �.. - �. .'.-'.' _- .. _ ..1: _• _ PSA 35 ._._ _9"...: CERT 35 Reaoehtial Fire ' `''�..•.�_ :.. _.'s. -1 - _s' �' _ 4... __ 0 Total -; . -, _. -._:120 _. 0 -_; 0 " 0.__ _ _ _0.. 0 .' -_ 0 • _ ".0 ` 120 INCIDENTIRESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2012 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total CommerdiaLFire 0 •_ ", -. ,�...-:. t._ _ _.:..0 False Alarm 68 68 Haiafdoii .Material .. -_ __ _.. _ ,, 0 .., , .. . '- - -,, ;,. ... _ . !.' _ .. .. - .. .- --,.... s -., :.0_._. Medical 436 436 Multi -Family Dwellui9_ '‘;. __~- .. '2 t,.-: _z. �.. -, 1- •-.`--':• ".• '.'. ..; `, . -. :'. _'.. �.;2--.. Other Fire 4 4 OtheuMissc:_ _.__-.__:_� = _ _.. tt =off _ _ ._ o .- .- ._ - <... _ _,... .... �.. - �. .'.-'.' _- .. _ ..1: _• _ PSA 35 35 Reaoehtial Fire ' `''�..•.�_ :.. _.'s. -1 - _s' �' _ 4... __ Rescue 0 0 Standby____`_ - ...:: _ ..:._ c:__11. _,..: :': `- ,:. ... .; ^•.. . .'. <.�_ .._.. ...f '< .. _s. _... .- __. _11;. ,". Traffic Collision 66 66 Wildland Fire 0 TotaL_—:_—. 1—__ L-_626.:—___0_