HomeMy WebLinkAbout032310 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title Ili
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
MARCH 23, 2010 — 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can
be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
`6:00 P.M. -- Closed 'Session of the City Council/Temecula 'Redevelopment Agency
pursuant to Government Code Section:
'1) _ Conference with City Attorney pursuant'to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
with respect to one matter of pending litigation to which the City is a defendant.
The title of the. litigation is Daniel D. Sorenson vs. City of Temecula,, et.
al. Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 526355(tort damages. litigation).
2) Conference with °City Attorney, pursuant'to Government Code Section, 54956.9(b)
with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect to such matter, the
City. Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a
significant.exposureto litigation involving the City and City related.entities.based
on existing facts and circumstances.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City, and `various parties
rnay be acquired byieviewinq the public documents held by the City Clerk.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: 10-07
Resolution: 10-25
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero
Prelude Music: Jordan Koford
Invocation: Pastor Dominic Rivkin of Trinity Lutheran Church
Flag Salute: Council Member Edwards
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day Proclamation
California State University San Marcos Month in Temecula Proclamation
1l1-31111[0ZdS a]'I ,WkII&`
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an
item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are
called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak"
form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a
five minute (5) time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for
separate action.
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2 Action Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the action minutes of March 9, 2010.
3 List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT
A
City Council authorization to apply for a Caltrans Multiiurisdictional Transportation
Planning Grant
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESIGNATING TEMECULA AS THE RECIPIENT, AND THE WESTERN
RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG) AS THE SUB -
RECIPIENT FOR PURPOSES OF SUBMITTING A GRANT APPLICATION TO
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL CORRIDOR PLANNING
PROGRAM
Acceptance of Improvements and Notice of Completion for Pechanga Parkway Phase II
Street Improvements — Proiect No. PW99-11
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Accept the Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements, Project No.
PW99-11 as complete;
5.2 Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the
Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount
of 10% of the contract amount;
5.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Reiect all Construction Bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Proiect FY2009-10 Roripaugh
Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicholas Valley Areas — Proiect No. PW09-06
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Reject all Construction Bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Project for FY2009-10,
Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas Valley Areas, Project
No. PW09-06;
6.2 Authorize Staff to Re -advertise the Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009-10,
Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas Valley Areas, Project
No. PW09-06 for Construction Bids.
7 Acceptance of Improvements and Notice of Completion for DePortola Road Pavement
Rehabilitation — Project No. PW06-10
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Accept the construction of the De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project,
Project No. PW 06-10, as complete;
7.2 Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the
Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount
of 10% of the contract amount;
7.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after fling of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
8 Resolution of Support for District Attorney's Office Enforcement of Existing Violent
Sexual Offender Laws (at the request of Mayor Comerchero and Council Member
Naggar
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SUPPORTING THE COMBINED EFFORTS OF THE TEMECULA POLICE
DEPARTMENT AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE FOR STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF EXISTING VIOLENT SEXUAL
OFFENDER LAWS
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE
CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 10-01
Resolution: No. CSD 10-02
CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name for the record.
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
9 Action Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve the action minutes of March 9, 2010.
10 Santa's Electric Light Parade and Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony in Old Town
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve the relocation of the Annual Santa's Electric Light Parade to Old Town
Front Street, from its current location on Jefferson Avenue;
10.2 Approve the relocation of the Annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony to the
Civic Center in Old Town Temecula, from its current location at the Temecula
Duck Pond.
11 Acceptance of Improvements and Notice of Completion for the Temecula Communit
Center Expansion Project — Project No. PW06-05
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Accept the Temecula Community Center Expansion, Project No. PW06-05 as
complete;
11.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance
Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the
contract amount;
11.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
12 Award the Construction Contract for the Temecula Community Center Expansion -
Phase 2, Renovation of Historical Buildings — Project No. PW06-05
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Award a construction contract for the Temecula Community Center Expansion -
Phase 2, Renovation of Historical Buildings, Project No. PW06-05 to Caltec
Corp. in the amount of $520,950;
12.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $130,237.50, which is equal to 25% of the contract
amount;
12.3 Approve the acceleration and transfer of $159,200 from the Capital Improvement
Budget of FY2010-2011 for the Old Town Gymnasium to the current FY2009-
2010 for the Temecula Community Center Expansion - Phase 2, Renovation of
Historical Buildings, Project No. PW06-05;
12.4 Make a finding that the Temecula Community Center Expansion - Phase 2,
Renovation of Historical Buildings project is exempt from Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees.
CSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
13 Community Services Department Monthly Report
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 13, 2010, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular
session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 10-01
Resolution: No. RDA 10-04
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Mike Naggar
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington,
Naggar
RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name for the record.
RDA CONSENT CALENDAR
14 Action Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve the action minutes of March 9, 2010.
RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
15 Redevelopment Department Monthly Report
RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT
RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
RDA ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 13, 2010, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular
session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
91
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
2119[a:IX_1NI.V
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or
may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at
the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited
to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
16 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending portions of Title 17
of the Temecula Municipal Code (Long Range Planning Project No. LR09-0001)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 10 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
TO REVISE FAMILY DAYCARE REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
STATE LAW, UPDATE PUBLIC NOTICING REQUIREMENTS, REQUIRE A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN WINE TASTING
ESTABLISHMENTS, MODIFY SIGN PROGRAM REGULATIONS, CLARIFY
GOVERNMENTAL EXEMPT SIGNS, STREAMLINE EXTENSION OF TIME
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS, REMOVE THE TERM "GRANNY FLAT,"
REVISE GUEST HOUSE REQUIREMENTS AND MAKE OTHER MINOR
CLARIFICATIONS OR TYPOGRAPHICAL CORRECTIONS (LONG RANGE
PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR09-0001)
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
17 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 10-06/Implementation of Existing 2008 Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) Contract Provision - PERS Contract Amendment/Early
Retirement Option
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Waive further reading and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 10-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT
BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM
17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
10
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING TO GRANT ANOTHER DESIGNATED PERIOD
FOR TWO YEARS ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT
17.3 Certify PERS Form CON -12, Certification of Governing Body's Action;
17.4 Certify PERS Form CON -12A, Certification of Compliance with Government
Code Section 7507;
17.5 Certify PERS Form, Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section
20903.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
18 Planning Department Monthly Report
19 City Council Travel/Conference Report - February 2010
20 Police Department Monthly Report
21 Public Works Department Monthly Report
22 Economic Development Monthly Report
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 13, 2010, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular
session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
11
PRESENTATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, beginning in 1950 and ending with troop evacuations in 1975, the Vietnam War was the longest conflict in American
history; and
WHEREAS, 324,400 Californians served in the Vietnam War, putting their lives on the line for the cause of freedom; and
WHEREAS, thousands more served in Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and in the waterways throughout Southeast Asia in support ofthe
war effort; and
WHEREAS, during the Vietnam War, more than 18,000 Californians were wounded and 5,822 were killed; and
WHEREAS, although our nation was divided in its support of the Vietnam War, we must pledge to never forget the outstanding
strength, service and sacrifice of those who fought to defend democracy; and
WHEREAS, as a Nation, we have not appropriately recognized the contributions of these brave military men and women, nor
appropriately thanked them for their service; and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger signed AB 717 which established March 30, 2010 as "Welcome
Back Home Vietnam Veterans Day," and encourages other institutions to recognize the contributions of all those involved in the Vietnam
War.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Jeff Comerchero, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the 30"' day of
March to be
"Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day"
in the City of Temecula and commend those Temecula veterans who risked their lives in protecting our country's freedom.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to
be affixed this twenty-third day of March, 2010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, California State University San Marcos is celebrating its 20th anniversary in 2010; and
WHEREAS, 23,000 students have graduated from the University and 9,700 students are currently enrolled; and
WHEREAS, California State University San Marcos has contributed to the economic growth and success of ourregion with nearly
90 percent of its alumni remaining in the region providing a pool of skilled and talented workers; and
WHEREAS, California State University San Marcos students provide over 165,000 hours in community service annually; and
WHEREAS, California State University San Marcos opened a Temecula campus in 2008;
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Jeff Comerchero, on behalf ofthe City Council ofthe City of Temecula, hereby proclaim March 2010 to
be;
"California State University San Marcos Month in Temecula"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to
be affixed this twenty-third day of March, 2010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk
CONSENT CALENDAR
Item No. 1
Item No. 2
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
MARCH 9, 2010 — 7:00 PM
6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council/Temecula
pursuant to Government Code Section:
1) Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)
with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect to such matter, the
City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a
significant exposure to litigation involving the City and City related entities based
on existing facts and circumstances. With respect to such matter, the City Council
will also meet pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) to decide whether
to initiate litigation.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties
may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk.
At 6:00 P.M., Mayor Comerchero called the Closed Session meeting to order.
The City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero
Prelude Music: Great Oak High School Jazz Combo
Invocation: Pastor Gary Nelson of Calvary Chapel of Temecula
Flag Salute: Council Member Washington
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificate of Achievement - Eagle Scout Patrick Baker
Certificate of Achievement - Eagle Scout Hans Britsch
Certificate of Achievement - Eagle Scout Brian Hizon
Certificate of Appreciation - The Castillo Family
1
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jeannie Hardy and Rita O'Neill, representing the Temecula Valley Council of PTA and Citizens
Scholarship Foundation of Temecula Valley, addressed the City Council.
Paul Jacobs commented on the California Environmental Quality Act.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure - Approved Staff
Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member
Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and
electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the action minutes of February 23, 2010.
3 List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member
Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and
electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT
A
4 City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2010 -Approved Staff Recommendation (5-
0-0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council
Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2010.
5 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids
for the Storm Drain Repair at Rancho California Road, Project No. PW09-08 -
Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Washington made the
motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote
reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public
Works to solicit construction bids for the Storm Drain Repair at Rancho California
Road, Project No. PW09-08.
6 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids
for Road Reconstruction at Jedediah Smith Road, Project No. PW09-10 and approval of
an Amended Spending Plan for Proposition 1 B funding - Approved Staff
Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve an amendment to the City's Proposition 1 B Spending Plan for FY 2008-
09 to include East Vallejo Road and Cabrillo Avenue as part of the Road
Reconstruction at Jedediah Smith Road Project;
6.2 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public
Works to solicit construction bids for the Road Reconstruction at Jedediah Smith
Road, Project No. PW09-10.
7 Payment of the City's share of the Regional Municipal Stormwater Permit for the Santa
Margarita Watershed for FY 2009-2010 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) —
Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council
Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve payment to the Riverside County Flood Control District in the sum of
$188,825.16 as the City's portion of the cost-sharing reimbursement pursuant to
the Implementation Agreement between the Santa Margarita Watershed
Permittees approved by the City Council in January 2005.
8 Support of the Local Taxpayer, Public Safety, and Transportation Protection Act of 2010
(at the request of Council Member Washington) - Approved Staff Recommendation
(5-0-0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by
Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
EXPRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL'S SUPPORT FOR THE LOCAL
TAXPAYER, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND TRANSPORTATION PROTECTION ACT
OF 2010, WHICH IS A BALLOT MEASURE SCHEDULED FOR THE
NOVEMBER 2010 STATEWIDE BALLOT, AND WOULD PROHIBIT THE
STATE FROM TAKING, BORROWING OR REDIRECTING LOCAL
TAXPAYER FUNDS DEDICATED TO PUBLIC SAFETY, EMERGENCY
RESPONSE AND OTHER VITAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES
9 Designation of March 2010 as Census Month (at the request of Council Member
Washington) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member
Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and
electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO
SUPPORT THE UNITED STATES CENSUS - MAKE YOURSELF COUNT
MONTH MARCH 2010
10 Approve Payment for Golden Valley Music Society. Inc. - Approved Staff
Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve the payment to Golden Valley Music Society, Inc. in the amount of
$36,375 for services provided from December 13, 2007 to March 31, 2010.
11 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 10-04 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) —
Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council
Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 10-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION NO. 2 PRE -ZONING
APPROXIMATELY 4,510 ACRES, LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST
OF THE PRE-EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF
INTERSTATE -15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND
RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY WITH ZONING DESIGNATIONS HILLSIDE
RESIDENTIAL -SANTA MARGARITA (HR -SM) AND CONSERVATION
DISTRICT -SANTA MARGARITA (OS -C -SM) (LR09-0024)
12 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 10-05 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) —
Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council
Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 10-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY
ADOPTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL -SANTA
MARGARITA (HR -SM) AND OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION DISTRICT -
SANTA MARGARITA (OS -C -SM) AND ADOPTING HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR A PRE -ZONING OF THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA
ANNEXATION NO. 2 OF APPROXIMATELY 4,510 ACRES, LOCATED
IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST OF THE PRE-EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA
BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF INTERSTATE -15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN
DIEGO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY (LR09-0024)
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
17 ADDroval of Interaovernmental Aareements with the Pechanaa Band of Luiseno Indians
for the Mitigation of Off -Reservation Impacts from the Pechanga Gaming Center
pursuant to the Tribal State Compact between the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
and the State of California - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council
Member Roberts made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards;
and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE "INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT" BETWEEN THE
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISEIVO INDIANS AND THE CITY AND APPROVING
THE "MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING LAW
ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AT PECHANGA CASINO" BETWEEN THE
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISEIVO INDIANS, CITY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
AND THE SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
City Attorney Thorson presented the staff report as per agenda material.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
With respect to the Closed Session item, City Attorney Thorson advised that there was no
action to report.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:47 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 23, 2010, at
5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Item No. 3
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: List of Demands
PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager
Leah Thomas, Accounting Specialist
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review
and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached
claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or
authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies
and procedures.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
List of Demands
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on
file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and
that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $3,143,914.52.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 23rd day of March, 2010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of March, 2010, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IG1 011�Ko1l1►NllNdiIAdi1:l4:&1
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
03/04/2010 TOTAL CHECK RUN
03/11/2010 TOTAL CHECK RUN
03/04/2010 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
$ 2,192,092.76
508,449.08
443,372.68
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/23/2010 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 3,143,914.52
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND
CHECKS:
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 1,616,884.24
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
20,771.03
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
297,224.26
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
152.02
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE
70,195.04
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
1,500.46
195
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R
1,562.50
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
4,845.09
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
9,522.20
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND
541,240.70
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT
29,413.48
300
INSURANCE FUND
6,668.98
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
51,597.42
330
SUPPORT SERVICES
7,926.85
340
FACILITIES
29,528.50
375
SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM
82.44
477
CFD- RORIPAUGH
4,054.00
700
CERBT CALIFORNIA BE RETIREE-GASB45
7,372.63
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 262,119.30
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
10,835.14
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
107,308.89
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
136.86
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE
3,457.20
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
1,414.71
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
1,223.64
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
380.16
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT
4,171.24
300
INSURANCE FUND
1,310.62
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
23,342.22
330
SUPPORT SERVICES
5,665.21
340
FACILITIES
10,018.05
700
CERBT CALIFORNIA BE RETIREE-GASB45
11,989.44
TOTAL BY FUND:
$ 2,700,541.84
443,372.68
$ 3,143,914.52
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
03/04/2010 3:03:15PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
010851
Check#
Date
Vendor
008698
Description
1429
03/04/2010
000642
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
Child Care Reimbursement Payment
1430
03/04/2010
000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES'
PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payment
RETIREMENT)
1431
03/04/2010
001065
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
Nationwide Retirement Payment
SOLUTION
1432
03/04/2010
000283
INSTATAX(IRS)
Federal Income Taxes Payment
1433
03/04/2010
000444
INSTATAX (EDD)
State Disability Ins Payment
1434
03/04/2010
000245
PERS - HEALTH INSUR PREMIUM
PERS Health Admin Cost Payment
Blue Shield HMO Payment
1435
03/04/2010
010349
CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT
Support Payment
1436 03/04/2010 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
SOLUTION
137259 02/25/2010 000478 FAST SIGNS
137260 03/04/2010 003552 AFLAC
137261 03/04/2010 001104 ARM A
137262 03/04/2010 004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI
137263 03/04/2010 013367 ACTIVE MICRO INC
137264
03/04/2010
010851
ADAMIAK, DAWN
137265
03/04/2010
008698
ADVANCEDAPPLIED
ENGINEERING
OBRA- Project Retirement Payment
Signage/banners:Prkg Structure
AFLAC Cancer Payment
regist:ARMA cf 3/31 MB/GF
TCSD instructor earnings
Misc Tools & Equipment: PW Traffic
Misc Tools & Equipment: PW Traffic
reimb:'10 Egg Hunt Prizes
Oct -Jan eng design:79S park & ride
Amount Paid
9,165.30
114,670.87
15,384.34
81,029.31
25,324.57
78,844.24
0.00
553.84
2,441.14
3,118.30
3,502.30
160.00
760.00
789.95
310.33
52.20
3,790.00
Check Total
9,165.30
114,670.87
15,384.34
81,029.31
25,324.57
78,844.24
553.84
2,441.14
3,118.30
3,502.30
160.00
760.00
1,100.28
52.20
3,790.00
Page:1
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 2
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137266
03/04/2010
013015
ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW
annual backflow test: MPSC
25.00
backflowtestng & repair:medians/parks
50.00
backflow testing: library
50.00
backflow testing: TV Museum
50.00
credit: billing adj fees invoice 12110
-6.00
credit: billing adj fees inv 12010
-3.00
backflow repairs:various locations
482.86
backflow testing: CRC
50.00
credit: billing adj fees inv 12210
-6.00
credit: billing adj fees inv 12510
-6.00
credit: billing adj fees inv 12410
-6.00
680.86
137267
03/04/2010
004240
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES
DUI & drug screenings: Police
237.00
(AFN)
DUI & drug screenings: Police
355.50
Mar Stand By fee: Police
1,200.00
1,792.50
137268
03/04/2010
002648
AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIF
Membership: 80925362 Levis, M
47.00
Membership: 34054446 Ludwig, Perry
47.00
94.00
137269
03/04/2010
004040
BIG FOOT GRAPHICS
TCSD instructor earnings
644.00
TCSD instructor earnings
385.00
1,029.00
137270
03/04/2010
012583
BLANCA Y PRICE
2/2326 Ldscp Plan Ck/Insp:Planning
1,250.00
credit: PA05-0332 fees adjusted
-500.00
credit: PA06-0137 fees adjusted
-500.00
2/10.12 Ldscp Plan Ck/Insp: Planning
1,000.00
2/17-19 Ldscp Plan Ck/Insp: Planning
1,850.00
3,100.00
137271
03/04/2010
000128
BROWN & BROWN OF CALIF INC
Ins policy WV0000092 7/09-10
1,016.77
WC ins hacrub9055151210 2/10-11
81,443.00
Ins plc#1052338752/10-11 Crime
4,076.00
86,535.77
137272
03/04/2010
005055
BROWN, STEPHEN
Retirement Medical Payment
695.00
695.00
137273
03/04/2010
009082
CBC TECHNICAL INC
misc supplies: Theater
80.64
misc supplies: Theater
166.17
246.81
137274
03/04/2010
003138
CAL MAT
PW patch truck materials
214.15
PW patch truck materials
474.64
PW patch truck materials
541.16
PW patch truck materials
363.72
PW patch truck materials
179.93
PW patch truck materials
211.74
PW patch truck materials
404.97
PW patch truck materials
398.89
PW patch truck materials
402.94
3,192.14
Page2
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 3
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137275
03/04/2010
001159
CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE
Jan Fingerpnnting Svcs:Hr/Police
3,932.00
3,932.00
137276
03/04/2010
008644
CANTRELL, ROGER, AIA, AICP
Dec design cnslt svcs: Planning
1,595.00
credit: billing adj sq ft recalculated
-40.40
1,554.60
137277
03/04/2010
004006
CARROLL, JOSEPH
portrait photography: Council
799.31
799.31
137278
03/04/2010
000137
CHEVRON AND TEXACO
City vehicles fuel: CM
180.80
180.80
137279
03/04/2010
004405
COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES
Community Health Charities Payment
66.00
66.00
137280
03/04/2010
004414
COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN
Dec enviro design svcs:msp
4,871.70
4,871.70
GROUP
137281
03/04/2010
000442
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
2/5-3/31 parking structure alarm svcs
97.16
97.16
137282
03/04/2010
000447
COMTRONIX
equip move/transfer: PW Maint
788.96
788.96
137283
03/04/2010
006303
CONDUIT NETWORKS, INC
misc computer supplies: city hall
481.35
481.35
137284
03/04/2010
012353
CONSTRUCTION TESTING
Jan geotech svcs: Civic Center
7,181.00
7,181.00
137285
03/04/2010
013379
COUSSOU, CELINE
TCSD Instructor Earnings
159.60
TCSD Instructor Earnings
186.20
345.80
137286
03/04/2010
003986
COZAD & FOX INC
Jan Survey Svc:S Margarita Annex
1,200.00
1,200.00
137287
03/04/2010
013016
CR STUDIO 4
TCSD Instructor Earnings
168.00
168.00
137288
03/04/2010
004123
D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES
Mar storefront lease:police old town
2,790.26
2,790.26
137289
03/04/2010
012600
DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES INC
Dec design eng secs: Liefer Rd
9,230.41
Jan design eng svcs: Liefer Rd
72.90
9,303.31
137290
03/04/2010
013445
DECENA, JENNIFER
refund:picture... reading 1075.103
70.00
70.00
Page3
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 4
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137291
03/04/2010
003945
DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
Mar portable restrooms: Riverton
52.88
SRVCS
Mar portable restrooms: Redhawk
52.88
Mar portable restrooms: Vail Ranch
52.88
Mar portable restrooms: Veterans
52.88
Mar portable restrooms: Lng Cyn
52.88
264.40
137292
03/04/2010
011202
E M H SPORTS & FITNESS
TCSD instructor earnings
588.00
TCSD instructor earnings
308.00
896.00
137293
03/04/2010
002528
EAGLE GRAPHIC CREATIONS INC Safety Flashlights: TCC
1,121.91
1,121.91
137294
03/04/2010
011292
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Aug Liberty Quarry: EIR Review
7,396.96
7,396.96
ASSOC.
137295
03/04/2010
001056
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
Jan Idscp maint: north slopes
21,860.00
Jan Idscp maint: south slopes
39,158.00
Jan Idscp maint: medians
16,487.00
Jan Idscp maint: city facilities
9,685.00
Jan Idscp maint: parks/schools
43,040.00
irrigation maint: Redhawk medians
50.00
landscape maint: library
155.04
130,435.04
137296
03/04/2010
000478
FAST SIGNS
exhibit signage: TV Museum
45.33
exhibit signage: TV Museum
86.73
132.06
137297
03/04/2010
011922
FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC
Jan database subscr: code enf
6.00
INC
Dec database subscr: code enf
18.00
24.00
137298
03/04/2010
003633
FOOTHILL EASTERN
Jul '09-Jan'10toll roads usage
129.85
129.85
TRANSPORTN.
137299
03/04/2010
011967
FULL VALUE ENTERTAINMENT
sttlmnt: Live at the Merc 2/19
171.50
171.50
137300
03/04/2010
004944
FULLCOURT PRESS
Business License Certs finance
356.16
356.16
137301
03/04/2010
000172
GASB
GARS 1 yr 3/10-3/11: Finance
495.00
495.00
137302
03/04/2010
010326
G E MOBILE WATER, INC
osmosis washer maint/rent: Stn 73
147.27
147.27
137303
03/04/2010
013361
GARCIA, JACALYN LOPEZ
exhibition fee:Lifecyles Exhibit
350.00
350.00
137304
03/04/2010
013076
GAUDET, YVONNE M.
TCSD Instructor Earnings
800.80
TCSD Instructor Earnings
245.00
1,045.80
Page:4
apChkLst
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 5
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137305
03/04/2010
000177
GLENN I ES OFFICE PRODUCTS
Office Supplies: Library/Info Sys
511.04
INC
Office Supplies: CRC/Aquatics
374.22
Office Supplies: Records Mgmt
21.16
Office Supplies: Info Sys/GIS
71.09
Office Supplies: PW
274.64
Office Supplies: Central Svcs
19.37
Office Supplies: TCSD/MPSC
375.03
1,646.55
137306
03/04/2010
000175
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
GAAFR review newsletter: Finance
50.00
50.00
OFFICERS
137307
03/04/2010
013446
GUTIERREZ, GRACIELA
refund:beg hip hop 1310.102
50.00
50.00
137308
03/04/2010
000520
HDL COREN & CONE INC
Jan -Mar '10 property tax cnslt: Finance
5,000.00
5,000.00
137309
03/04/2010
001135
HEALTH POINTE MEDICAL GROUP
Emp industrial care srvcs:HR
380.81
380.81
INC
137310
03/04/2010
012204
HERITAGE FAMILY MINISTRIES
TCSD Instructor Earnings
1,092.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings
364.00
1,456.00
137311
03/04/2010
001013
HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS &
3rd qtr sales tax cnslt svcs:finance
3,162.81
3,162.81
ASSOC
137312
03/04/2010
000963
HOGAN, DAVID
Retirement Medical Payment
695.00
695.00
137313
03/04/2010
003624
HOWELL, ANN MARIE
Graphic Design Svcs: Eco Dev
1,044.00
1,044.00
137314
03/04/2010
000194
1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN
I C M A Retirement Trust 457 Payment
6,622.49
6,622.49
303355
137315
03/04/2010
012342
INLAND CUTTER SERVICE INC
paper drill maint: Central Svcs
275.00
275.00
137316
03/04/2010
006914
INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT
equip repair/maint: central svcs
125.00
SOLUTIONS
Jan copier maint/usage: citywide
2,661.78
Jan copier maint/usage: library
538.48
3,325.26
137317
03/04/2010
001186
IRWIN, JOHN
TCSD instructor earnings
83.30
TCSD instructor earnings
568.40
TCSD instructor earnings
627.20
1,278.90
137318
03/04/2010
012883
JACOB'S HOUSE INC
Jacob's House Charity Payment
220.00
220.00
137319
03/04/2010
012285
JOHNSTONESUPPLY
thermostat: CRC
29.08
29.08
Pages
apChkLst
03/04/2010
003726
Final Check List
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
012962
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check#
Date Vendor
MAIN STREET SIGNS
Description
137320
03/04/2010 000488
KNOTTS BERRY FARM
excursion: Knotts Berry Farm 3/9
137321
03/04/2010 000482
LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC
Jan geotech test svcs:OT Parking
137322
03/04/2010 004176
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Feb Long distance & internet svcs
137323 03/04/2010 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY&WHITMORE Jan HR legal svcs for TE060-01
137324
03/04/2010
003726
LIFE ASSIST INC
medical supplies: paramedics
03/04/2010
012962
MILLER, MISTY
137333
medical supplies: paramedics
137325
03/04/2010
003782
MAIN STREET SIGNS
Misc signs: PW Maint
MIRANDA, JULIO C.
Misc signs: PW Maint
Misc signs: PW Maint
Misc signs: PW Maint
Traffic signal pole straps:pw traffic
137326
03/04/2010
004141
MAINTEX INC
custodial supplies: var city sites
137327
03/04/2010
000944
MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC
Qty 18 210 conflict monitor unit:pw
137328
03/04/2010
006571
MELODY'S AD WORKS INC.
Mar mrktg & promo srvcs:old town
137329
03/04/2010
003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
MetLife Dental Insurance Payment
137330 03/04/2010 009541 MEYER AND ASSOCIATES
137331
03/04/2010
013390
MILLER, JOSHUA
137332
03/04/2010
012962
MILLER, MISTY
137333
03/04/2010
012580
MINUTEMAN PRESS
137334
03/04/2010
012264
MIRANDA, JULIO C.
137335 03/04/2010 001892 MOBILE MODULAR
Jan consulting srvcs:barn relocation
Dec consulting srvcs:barn relocation
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
Window envelopes:fnance
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
2/10-3/11 modular lease: The Pantry
Amount Paid
257.43
2,134.50
741.00
405.00
240.21
16.89
489.38
3,652.87
312.66
4,030.76
902.91
2,688.78
4,976.36
3,000.00
7,978.50
2,500.00
2,404.00
175.00
525.00
931.00
HAWN
21.00
168.00
420.00
1,042.91
Page: 6
Check Total
257.43
2,134.50
741.00
405.00
257.10
9,388.58
2,688.78
4,976.36
3,000.00
7,978.50
4,904.00
700.00
931.00
481.06
609.00
1,042.91
Pages
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
03/04/2010 3:03:15PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid
137336 03/04/2010 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS Dec Consulting: French Vly/1-15 Overcross 70,497.29
137337 03/04/2010 011329 MOGHADAM, ALI Retirement Medical Payment
137338 03/04/2010 010990 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN Youth Master Plan: Csd
INC
137339 03/04/2010 001986 MUZAK -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Mar media broadcasting signal: FOC
137347 03/04/2010 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS
DIV
137348 03/04/2010 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
137349 03/04/2010 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
Misc office supplies:police mall office
Misc office supplies:police mall office
Misc office supplies:police mall office
Misc office supplies:central services
City Vehicle Maint Svcs: PW Maint
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Maint
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Maint
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW CIP
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD
650.72
143.75
103.66
69.11
25.20
210.00
50.40
134.40
126.00
30,393.51
30,302.30
4,054.00
1,054.53
2,148.69
1,428.84
564.02
415.13
400.05
10.98
34.25
6.09
61.30
58.00
128.61
120.00
319.16
127.20
36.57
46.96
Check Total
70,497.29
650.72
143.75
172.77
546.00
60,695.81
4,054.00
3,203.22
1,428.84
979.15
400.05
112.62
625.77
210.73
Page:7
Mar Music Broadcast Old Town
137340
03/04/2010
013375
MYERS-RUSSO, ERICA
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
137341
03/04/2010
008528
NICHOLS, MELBURG & ROSETTO
Jan Eng Srvs:Civic Center Ph II
Jan Dsgn:Old Town Infrastructure
137342
03/04/2010
010273
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Jan legal srvcs:roripaugh cfd 03-02
137343
03/04/2010
010244
NO LIMITS SILK SCREEN
Softball awards:Sports pgrm
Lifeguard uniforms:aquatics pgrm
137344
03/04/2010
002139
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Jan advertising:Temecula Presents/Thtr
137345
03/04/2010
006140
NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS
Apr -Jun assn dues xx20: French Vly
PARK
Apr -Jun assn dues xx17: French Vly
137346
03/04/2010
002292
OASIS VENDING
cofteelkitchen supplies:city hall
137347 03/04/2010 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS
DIV
137348 03/04/2010 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
137349 03/04/2010 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
Misc office supplies:police mall office
Misc office supplies:police mall office
Misc office supplies:police mall office
Misc office supplies:central services
City Vehicle Maint Svcs: PW Maint
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Maint
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Maint
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW CIP
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD
650.72
143.75
103.66
69.11
25.20
210.00
50.40
134.40
126.00
30,393.51
30,302.30
4,054.00
1,054.53
2,148.69
1,428.84
564.02
415.13
400.05
10.98
34.25
6.09
61.30
58.00
128.61
120.00
319.16
127.20
36.57
46.96
Check Total
70,497.29
650.72
143.75
172.77
546.00
60,695.81
4,054.00
3,203.22
1,428.84
979.15
400.05
112.62
625.77
210.73
Page:7
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 8
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137350
03/04/2010
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:City Mgr
43.75
43.75
137351
03/04/2010
004538
PAULEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Equip repair & maint:tcsd
91.28
91.28
137352
03/04/2010
013381
PEREZ, AARON TROY
TCSD Instructor Earnings
805.00
805.00
137353
03/04/2010
001958
PERS LONG TERM CARE
PERS Long Term Care Payment
169.04
169.04
PROGRAM
137354
03/04/2010
001999
PITNEY BOWES
Apr -Jun postage meter lease: Cntrl Srvcs
271.60
271.60
137355
03/04/2010
012251
PORTRAIT PRODUCTIONS
TCSD Instructor Earnings
378.00
378.00
137356
03/04/2010
005820
PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC
PrePaid Legal Services Payment
460.35
460.35
137357
03/04/2010
000254
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY
3/10.3/11 subscr:City Mgr 9298672
165.36
INC
2/10.2/11 subscr:City Clerk 1633708
175.76
341.12
137358
03/04/2010
012904
PRO ACTIVE FIRE DESIGN
Feb plancheck srvcs: Fire Prev
1,377.73
1,377.73
137359
03/04/2010
005075
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
Jan uniform/fir mat/twt rental:City
1,229.32
1,229.32
137360
03/04/2010
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT
Feb various water meters:crowne hill
114.07
Feb water meters 30875 rncho vista
637.01
Feb water meters 30650 pauba rd
145.98
Feb water meters 30650 pauba rd
17.35
914.41
137361
03/04/2010
003761
RANCHO METALS & SUPPLY
Metal for Facility Maint:Fire Stn 84
13.70
13.70
137362
03/04/2010
000907
RANCHO TEMECULA CAR WASH
Jan City vehicles detailing srvcs
52.50
52.50
137363
03/04/2010
004584
REGENCY LIGHTING
credit: items returned/crc
-32.32
Misc electrical supplies:t mus/c museum
154.90
Misc electrical supplies:library
390.39
512.97
137364
03/04/2010
002110
RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION
Tool and equipment rental: PW Maint
26.99
26.99
137365
03/04/2010
004498
REPUBLIC INTELLIGENT
Jan traffic sig repair & maint:pw
939.81
939.81
Pageb
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 9
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137366
03/04/2010
000352
RIVERSIDE CO ASSESSOR
Dec/Jan assessor maps: b&s dept
24.00
24.00
137367
03/04/2010
000267
RIVERSIDE CO FIRE
Oct-Dec'09 fire services
1,149,597.21
1,149,597.21
DEPARTMENT
137368
03/04/2010
001592
RIVERSIDE CO INFO
Jan radio rental & maint:police/prk
1,568.58
1,568.58
TECHNOLOGY
137369
03/04/2010
000406
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT
Jan '10 booking fees:Police
5,380.00
5,380.00
137370
03/04/2010
003310
RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY
S.Marg. Annex Application fee
6,900.00
6,900.00
137371
03/04/2010
003310
RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY
S.Marg. Annex Sphere of Influence
2,300.00
2,300.00
137372
03/04/2010
004822
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
Janco -op agrmnt:temecula trolley
25,000.00
25,000.00
137373
03/04/2010
005842
RODECKER, ERIC
Retirement Medical Payment
367.83
367.83
137374
03/04/2010
002226
RUSSO, MARY ANNE
TCSD Instructor Earnings
294.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings
962.50
TCSD Instructor Earnings
577.50
1,834.00
137375
03/04/2010
007582
SAFEGUARD DENTAL & VISION
SafeGuard Vision Plan Payment
933.00
933.00
137376
03/04/2010
009980
SANBORN, GWYN
Country @ the Merc 02/20/10
724.50
724.50
137377
03/04/2010
013169
SCHINSKY, WILLIAM C.
Feb catalog artifacts: history museum
975.00
975.00
137378
03/04/2010
011511
SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA
TCSD Instructor Earnings
420.00
420.00
137379
03/04/2010
010803
SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING &
Jan prgs pmt #1:RRSP desilting basin
46,170.00
46,170.00
CONST
137380
03/04/2010
008529
SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL
Support Payment
200.00
200.00
137381
03/04/2010
008529
SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL
Support Payment
100.00
100.00
137382
03/04/2010
008529
SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL
Support Payment
100.00
100.00
Page9
apChkLst
03/04/2010
Final Check List
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check#
Date Vendor
Description
137383 03/04/2010 004814 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING INC Jan Dsgn:Main Street Bridge/Murr Creek
137384
03/04/2010
010079
SIMPKINS, KATHLEEN
137385
03/04/2010
004534
SKYTERRA
137386
03/04/2010
000645
SMART & FINAL INC
137387
03/04/2010
013273
SMITH, JAMES
137388
03/04/2010
003002
SMOOTHILL SPORTS
DISTRIBUTORS
Retirement Medical Payment
Feb EOC Stn Satellite Phone Svcs
Misc supplies:holiday tree lighting
Misc supplies:emp recognition
Misc supplies:dog house pgrm
Misc supplies:mpsc
Misc supplies:dog house pgrm
Misc supplies:date nite 2/13/10
Misc supplies:art gallery show
Retirement Medical Payment
Recognition:skate park competition
Amount Paid
11,472.56
695.00
147.38
4.01
46.34
104.65
228.76
76.09
328.43
59.58
349.99
314.13
Page: 10
Check Total
11,472.56
695.00
147.38
847.86
349.99
314.13
Page 10
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 11
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date Vendor Description
Amount
Paid
Check Total
137389
03/04/2010 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Feb 2-20-817-9939: Police
224.12
Feb 2-25-393-4681:41951 moraga rd
247.03
Feb 2-19-171-8568 Tern Wed Chapel
75.99
Feb 2-29-223-8607:42035 2nd st PED
475.77
Feb 2-31-282-0665:27407 diaz PED
23.59
Feb 2-02-351-4946 Sr Ctr
775.12
Feb 2-18-937-3152:41950 moreno rd
551.13
Feb 2-29-458-7548:32000 rncho cal
232.20
Feb 2-29-953-8249:46497 wlf crk PED
20.89
Feb 2-29-953-8082:31523 wolf vty rd
23.59
Feb 2-00-397-5042:City Hall
4,695.42
Feb 2-29-657-2332:45538 redwd PED
19.55
Feb 2-31-031-2616:27991 diaz PED
21.57
Feb 2-29-933-3831:43230 bus pk dr
1,466.77
Feb 2-29-807-1226:28077 diaz PED
21.57
Feb 2-29-807-1093:28079 diaz PED
22.92
Feb 2-31-419-2873:43000 Hwy 395
20.22
Feb 2-14-204-1615:30027 front st rdio
27.61
Feb 2-31-536-3481:41902 main st
199.63
Feb 2-31-536-3655:41904 main st
1,005.60
Feb 2-29-657-2787:41638 wnchstr rd
22.24
Feb 2-31-404-6020:28771 OT frnt st
1,335.74
Feb 2-29-295-3510:32211 wolf vty rd
813.87
Feb 2-29-224-0173: Fire Stns
1,606.17
Feb 2-28-904-7706:32329 overind td
176.69
Feb 2-21-981-4720:30153 Tem Pkwy
39.78
Feb 2-28-331-4847:32805 pauba LS3
130.55
Feb 2-27-371-8494:42189 winchester
34.90
14,310.23
137390
03/04/2010 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Feb 101-525-1560-6:27415 enterprise
324.36
Feb 095-167-7907-2:30650 pauba
323.18
Feb 015-575-0195-2:32211 wolf vty
497.80
Feb 125-244-2108-3 Library
831.33
Feb 026-671-2909-8 Theater
649.43
Feb 196-025-0344-3:C. Museum
240.25
Feb 181-383-8881-6 Museum
187.73
Feb 101-525-0950-0:28816 pujol st
178.34
Feb 021-725-0775-4 Sr Ctr
246.79
Feb 091-024-9300-5:30875 rncho vista
4,588.24
Feb 133040-7373-0 Maint Fac
134.16
8,201.61
137391
03/04/2010 000282 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC Adult softball rulebooks: sports pgrm
540.00
Adult softball rulebooks: sports pgrm
456.00
996.00
Page 11
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 12
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137392
03/04/2010
002503
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY
generator ann'I op fees: civic center
293.21
generator emissions fees: civic center
109.00
gen.ann'I op fees:Roripaugh Fire Stn
86.69
gen.emissions fees:Roripaugh Fire Stn
109.00
597.90
137393
03/04/2010
000519
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL
Pest control srvcs: Redhawk Park
84.00
INC
pest control:O.A.T.C.
48.00
pest control:Fire Stn 73
48.00
pest control:Fire Stn 92
42.00
222.00
137394
03/04/2010
007762
STANDARD INSURANCE
Mandatory Life Insurance Payment
9,873.29
9,873.29
COMPANY
137395
03/04/2010
012723
STANDARD INSURANCE
Voluntary Supp Life Insurance Payment
656.90
656.90
COMPANY
137396
03/04/2010
001972
STANLEY R HOFFMAN
fiscal study:santa marg annex
7,000.00
7,000.00
ASSOCIATES
137397
03/04/2010
009061
STURDIVANT, ANGELA P.
TCSD Instructor Earnings
548.80
548.80
137398
03/04/2010
000305
TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS
Misc. supplies:tiny tots pgrm
62.75
Misc. supplies:childrens museum
29.98
Misc. supplies:childrens museum
80.59
Misc. supplies:mpsc
126.05
Misc. supplies:date night 2/13/10
101.71
401.08
137399
03/04/2010
001547
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
Union Dues Payment
4,940.00
4,940.00
137400
03/04/2010
012265
TEMECULA ACE HARDWARE C/O
Misc supplies:var park sites
26.28
Misc supplies:var park sites
9.37
Misc supplies:var park sites
73.94
109.59
137401
03/04/2010
010679
TEMECULA AUTO
City vehicle repair & maint:Medics
284.08
REPAIR/RADIATOR
City vehicle repair & maint:Medics
43.05
327.13
137402
03/04/2010
010848
TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE
Feb plant lease srvcs:Library
200.00
200.00
137403
03/04/2010
011736
TEMECULA TROPHY INC
Recreation Supplies- Sports Prgm
31.48
31.48
137404
03/04/2010
009194
TEMECULA VALLEY NEWS
Feb Advertising:Temecula PresentsfFhtr
286.40
286.40
137405
03/04/2010
005970
TEMECULA VALLEY PLAYERS
tix sales/"Rumors" production
8,831.62
tix sales/'Vday temecula 2010"
7,781.75
16,613.37
Page:12
apChkLst
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 13
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137406
03/04/2010
004274
TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY
Locksmith srvcs:Harveston Park
100.88
100.88
CENTR
137407
03/04/2010
007636
THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL
Gas monitor repair supplies-Sta 73
289.31
289.31
137408
03/04/2010
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
Mar high speed internet:MPSC
44.95
Feb high speed internet:FS#92
102.45
147.40
137409
03/04/2010
000978
TIP OF SW RIVERSIDE COUNTY
1st Qtr Emerg. Response Vol. Prgm
2,442.00
2,442.00
INC
137410
03/04/2010
012725
TRZOP, MICHELLE
TCSD Instructor Earnings
1,344.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings
1,344.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings
2,016.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings
2,016.00
6,720.00
137411
03/04/2010
000199
UNITED STATE TREASURY
Support Payment
250.00
250.00
137412
03/04/2010
000325
UNITED WAY
United Way Charities Payment
62.00
62.00
137413
03/04/2010
012549
UPODIUM
Apparatus maint: Sta 12
318.97
318.97
137414
03/04/2010
005805
URISA
'10 mbrshp:k.beal/j.degange/a.matthews
525.00
525.00
137415
03/04/2010
004261
VERIZON
Feb xxx-5274 gen usage:Tem PD DSL
36.83
Feb xxx-5696 gen usage:sports complex
36.36
Feb xxx-5706 gen usage: FOC
183.06
Feb xxx-2676 general usage
36.36
Feb xxx-2016 gen usage: Reverse 911
120.27
Feb xxx-9196 gen usage TCC SAFE
169.48
Feb xxx-3526 gen usage fire alarm
109.07
691.43
137416
03/04/2010
004789
VERIZON ONLINE
Feb internet svcs:Tern PD DSL
42.99
42.99
137417
03/04/2010
012292
VIAMEDIA INC
Broadcasting:old town spcl events
495.00
495.00
137418
03/04/2010
001342
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC
Custodial supplies:City fac's
746.74
Custodial supplies:City fac's
738.72
Custodial supplies:Sta 73
243.17
1,728.63
137419
03/04/2010
006612
WEATHERPROOFING TECH, INC
Roof maint:theater
6,710.48
6,710.48
Page:13
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 14
03/04/2010
3:03:15PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
137420
03/04/2010
003730
WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC
Tree removal srvcs:rancho highlands
636.00
Tree removal srvcs:nsp
378.00
01/1-15/10 tree trimming srvcs:citywide
13,720.00
14,734.00
137421
03/04/2010
011740
WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIRENS
Pre-emption lights:police motor
364.32
364.32
INC
137422
03/04/2010
002109
WHITECAP INDUSTRIES INC
Misc maint supplies:pw maint div
64.42
Misc maint supplies:pw maint div
391.50
Misc maint supplies:pw maint div
187.83
Misc maint supplies:pw maint div
16.32
660.07
137423
03/04/2010
013442
WILDOMAR, CITY OF
state/city:s.nelson/b.johnson/g.yates
30.00
30.00
137424
03/04/2010
000341
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC
Traffic sgnl installation:pw CIP
1,990.00
1,990.00
137425
03/04/2010
013083
XTREME CLEAN HOODS
mpsc kitchen hood inspection srvc
400.00
400.00
137426
03/04/2010
003776
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
Medical Supplies: Paramedics
515.08
515.08
Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 2192 092.76
Page:14
Item No. 4
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: City Council authorization to apply for a Caltrans Multijurisdictional Transportation
Planning Grant
PREPARED BY: Dale West, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DESIGNATING TEMECULA AS THE RECIPIENT, AND
THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
(WRCOG) AS THE SUB -RECIPIENT FOR PURPOSES OF
SUBMITTING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL CORRIDOR PLANNING PROGRAM
BACKGROUND: In February 2009, Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
requested from their member agencies, project suggestions for a multijurisdictional transportation
corridor planning project. City staff proposed expanding planning efforts currently underway along
the Jefferson Avenue and I-15 corridor. These efforts include the WRCOG Transit Oriented
Development Project, the proposed Temecula Transit Center at Jefferson Avenue and Sanborn
Avenue, the Old Town Specific Plan Update, and the I-15 Interregional Partnership.
Based on the interest level of the cities and the planning studies which focus on this area, WRCOG
selected to move forward with a Caltrans grant application for the Jefferson corridor as proposed by
City staff. The 2009/2010 Caltrans grant would have provided funds for a coordinated transportation
and land use planning effort along the Jefferson Avenue corridor between the Cities of Temecula,
Murrieta and Lake Elsinore. Although District 8 Caltrans staff listed the project as "high" with strong
recommendation to fund, only one application was funded in the 2009/2010 funding cycle. Caltrans
staff expressed interest in the function of the Jefferson Corridor with the proposed transit center and
recommend the proposal be resubmitted in the 2010/2011 funding cycle. They also suggested
strengthening the proposal by adding the City of Wildomar.
The 2010/2011 Caltrans Transportation Planning Grants funding cycle has begun and City staff is
again proposing that the City of Temecula participate in the transportation planning effort. Under
this proposal, the City of Temecula would be identified as the lead agencyand recipient of the grant,
with WRCOG as a sub -recipient for the purposes of administering the grant; the Cities of Murrieta,
Lake Elsinore, and Wildomar would participate in the planning process. Upon award of the grant
funds, the City of Temecula and WRCOG will enter into an MOU in order to fund and administer the
grant program. The adoption of this Resolution does not obligate the City to accept grant funds
should the participating agencies be unable to fully negotiate terms of the MOU.
Pursuit of the Caltrans Community -Based Transportation Planning Grant is consistentwith past and
present planning studies and will promote public engagement, livable communities' concepts, and a
sustainable transportation system that addresses mobility, access, and safety for the Jefferson
Corridor. For the City of Temecula, the study will analyzing affordable housing opportunities, and
the impacts and opportunities associated with increased intensity and density of mixed-use land
uses, as well as the impacts and opportunities to the transportation network, as Jefferson Avenue
redevelops. Additionally, the Community -Based Transportation Planning Grantwould complement
the Urban Land Institute study for the Jefferson Corridor, which will evaluate land use and transit
opportunities and impacts as a result of the high speed rail alignment through the Cityof Temecula.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total grant amount requested is $248,200. The grant requires a 10
percent matching fund of which one-fourth may be in-kind services. The 10 percent match
requirement ($24,820) would be equally divided, upon agreement, among the four participating
jurisdictions. The match requirement for the City of Temecula is $6,205. The Jefferson Corridor
Study area is within the Redevelopment Project Area. The Redevelopment Agency Affordable
Housing Fund has adequate funds available to provide forthe City of Temecula's proportional share
of the matching fund requirement. A component of the Jefferson Corridor study will be to analyze
potential transit village development districts which will include development standards to facilitate
affordable housing which is consistent with California Redevelopment Law (CRL Section 33334.19).
The 10 percent match of affordable housing funds would be proportionate to the study's affordable
housing component.
ATTACHMENT: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING TEMECULA AS THE
RECIPIENT, AND THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL
OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG) AS THE SUB -RECIPIENT
FOR PURPOSES OF SUBMITTING A GRANT
APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
MULTIJURISDICTIONAL CORRIDOR PLANNING
PROGRAM
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine and declare that:
A. The California Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as
"Caltrans" has issued a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for Transportation
Planning Grants for Community Based Transportation Planning to provide grant funds
for coordinated transportation and land use planning that promotes public engagement,
livable communities, and a sustainable transportation system which includes mobility,
access, and safety.
B. The City of Temecula will be submitting a proposal to the California
Department of Transportation for Transportation Planning Grant Funds for Fiscal Year
2009-2010 under the category of Community -Based Transportation Planning to conduct
a Multijurisdictional Corridor Planning Study.
C. The Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), a Joint
Powers Authority, hereinafter sometimes to as WRCOG, will be identified as the sub -
recipient for the purposes of submitting a proposal to the California Department of
Transportation for Community -Based Transportation Planning to conduct a
Multijurisdictional Corridor Planning Study.
D. The stakeholders for this program includes, but is not limited to the
following entities: the City of Temecula, acting as the lead agency and recipient for
Community Based Transportation Planning Funds with Caltrans, the Western Riverside
Council of Governments (WRCOG), serving in the capacity of sub -recipient, and the
participating (letters currently being sought) Cities of Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, and
Wildomar.
E. Upon award of the grant funds, WRCOG and the City of Temecula will
enter into a formal MOU in order to fund and administer the grant program.
F. The City of Temecula is authorized to act as the lead agency for the
purposes of applying for and administering Caltrans the Community Based
Transportation Planning Program Grant, and the City Manager or his representative is
authorized and empowered to execute all contracts and agreements necessary to enter
into a contract with Caltrans for the purposes of submitting this proposal.
G. The City of Temecula shall submit to Caltrans Headquarters through
Caltrans District 8 a Community Based Transportation Planning Grant Application for
$249,000 to initiate the "Making the Connection: Exploring Multi -Jurisdictional Corridor
Planning" program with the WRCOG for the tasks and deliverables to be outlined in the
scope of work.
Section 2. Environmental Findings
A. Staff has determined that this Resolution is exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, Section 15262 — Feasibility and Planning Studies.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 23th day of March, 2010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23th day of March, 2010, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IG1 011�Ko1l1►NllNdiIAdi1:l4:&1
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
Item No. 5
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements and Notice of Completion for Pechanga Parkway
Phase II Street Improvements, Project No. PW99-11
PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer, CIP
Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer, CIP
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Accept the Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements, Project No. PW99-
11 as complete; and
2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the
Performance Bond and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount
of 10% of the contract amount; and
3. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: The Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements Project
(the Project) consisted of widening Pechanga Parkway to its ultimate width from Temecula
Parkway to Pechanga Road, approximately 2.7 miles. This project included asphalt pavement,
curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscaped medians, minor drainage facilities, water line, traffic signals
and striping. The project will provide for easier access to and from Redhawk, Wolf Creek and
the Pechanga Casino.
On April 22, 2008, City Council awarded the project's construction contract to All American
Asphalt (AAA) in the amount of $8,131,964.98 and authorized a contingency in the amount of
$813,196.50, which is 10% of the contract amount for a total authorization of $8,945,161.48. On
October 13, 2009, City Council authorized an increase to the project contingency in the amount
of $350,000 to cover unanticipated paramount changes associated with (a) project site
modifications along the Wolf Creek development side necessitating raising the elevations along
the east side of Pechanga Parkway, (b) placement of deep lifts of asphalt concrete at
intersections to minimize inconveniences to the public and to expedite the roadway work and (c)
construction of a thicker roadway sections as required by the updated soils report. Due to this
increase, the total project authorization is $9,295,161.48.
The contractor has substantially completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. However, there are few
outstanding unresolved items that include the following:
(a) EMWD claim: EMWD has filed a claim against both AAA and the City, for this project.
The claim is in the amount of $84,012.96 for lift station damages that AAA has allegedly
caused during the course of construction. Staff is currently discussing this claim with
AAA and is encouraging them and their insurance to address it promptly. The City
anticipates that AAA will address this claim accordingly and that there will be no cost
impacts to the City.
(b) Outstanding Punchlist Items: The items include: (1) the reconstruction of seven EMWD
manholes and (2) roadway repairs to specific locations along Pechanga Parkway, due to
the quality of the ride. These punchlist items have been scheduled, but to date, have not
been completed, due to inclement weather. The reconstruction of manholes will have a
cost impact to the City in the amount of $73,500. However, based on discussions and
negotiations with EMWD and AAA, the City anticipates that they will participate in the
cost associated with this rework. It is anticipated that EMWD's and AAA's participation
will be $27,300 and $11,550 respectively, for a total cost recovery amount of $38,850.
There are no cost impacts to the City for Item (2) above (roadway repairs).
(c) Outstanding Invoice Payment from EMWD: The City issued an invoice to EMWD for
work associated with the Reimbursement Agreement between EMWD and the City. The
invoice is in the amount of $69,910. Currently, EMWD has placed a hold on this payment
until their claim against the City and AAA is resolved.
In an attempt to not jeopardize the project's federal funds, staff is recommending that City
Council accept these improvements and direct City Clerk to proceed with the filing and
recordation of the Notice of Completion for this project. This will allow us to meet specific project
reporting criteria and requirements for federally funded projects.
All work will be warranted for a period of one (1) year from the date the City obtained "beneficial
use" (i.e., July 5, 2009) of the project improvements. The retention for this project will be
released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code Section 7107 and upon completion
of the outstanding punchlist items.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Pechanga Parkway Ph II Street Improvements, Project No.
PW99-11, is a Capital Improvement Project funded with Development Impact Fees — Street
Improvements, a Pechanga Indian Tribe Contribution, a Federal Public Lands and Highways
Grant, Reimbursements from RCWD and Standard Pacific Homes and the Wolf Creek
Community Facilities District (CFD). The total initial authorization for this project was
$8,945,161.48, which includes a contract amount of $8,131,964.98 and a 10% contingency of
$813,196.50. The first and only project contingency increase in the amount of $350,000 brings
the total project authorization to $9,295,161.48.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bonds
3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590.
3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to All
American Asphalt to perform the following work of improvement:
Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements, Project No. PW99-11
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the
City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on March 23, 2010. That upon said
contract the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland was surety for the bond given bythe said company
as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows:
Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements
Project No. PW99-11
6. The location of said property is: Pechanga Parkway, Temecula, California
Dated at Temecula, California, this 23 1h day of March, 2010
City of Temecula
Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 231h day of March, 2010
City of Temecula
Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND Bond No. 089 03 501
Executed in Two (2) Parts
CITY OF TEMECULA PROJECT NO. PW99-11
PECHANGA PARKWAY. PHASE 11 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FEDERAL PROJECT NO. PLHL-5459(014)
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT:
All American Asphalt, 400 East Sixth Street, Corona, CA. 92879
NAMEAND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S
a _ Corporation _ _ , hereinafter called Principal, and
(I,7( In whether a Cowmf pn, PartnerrhO orhoMduat) — —
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, 801 No. Brand Blvd, Glendale, CA. 91203
NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY
r
hereinafter called SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal Sum of Ewht Hundred Ninetv Five Thousand.
(y 895,019.00 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten
(10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the
Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a
certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 22nd day of April , 2008, a copy
of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of CITY OF TEMECULA
PROJECT NO. PW09-11 , PECHANGA PARKWAY PHASE It STREET IMPROVEMENTS,
FEDERAL PROJECT NO. PLHL-5459(014).
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER
against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period;
and
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on
March 23. 2010 : ee8e--
NOW, THEREFORE, TH' CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year
from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done
under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work,
and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or R shall appear that defective materials were
furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this
instrument shall be void.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and
reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by
the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and
included in any judgment rendered.
WRIEMANCE BOND Ma acrovnoxs+sora!o-nrr.nww se.xxq.wtartee�,oAewcwrm.nr«..rxxw
The Surety hereby stipulates and? agrees that no change, extension of'tiine; alteration, or addition
to the terms of the Con"ot, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications
accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby
waive notice of any such change, extension of bine, alteration, or addition to the terms of the
Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications:
Signed, and sealed this 9th day of March, 2010
(Seal)
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
SURETY
BY. �r�n__o� Tse t1�P�i oris
Rebecca Haas -Bates
(N me)
At orney-in-Fact
(I Itle)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey
All American Asphalt
(Nanus)
Se C f e
(Title)
MAINTENANCE Bt)Nb r.A�2 rt�aem,m>re�w�•xaangrawrs�:ai�w.+aew.*o++a�sntw»xw+rxmw
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Riverside
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
hist/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by 4whec/their
signatures) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf
CARMEN MARIE OCHOA of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
• � Commission # 1812634
z ;-r Notary Public - California > I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of
' Riverside County California that the forgoing paragraph is true and correct.
My Comm. Expires Sep 8, 2012
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature W,_,���V
Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of D
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other T
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Robert Bradley
o Individual
X Corporate Officer—Title(s): Vice President
❑ Partner— o Limited o General
o Attorney in Fact
o Trustee
o Other:
Top of thumb here
Signer's Name: Mark Luer
o Individual
XCorporate Officer —Title(s): Secretary
o Partner— o Limited o General !11l1!lllAlll
o Attorney in Fact
o Trustee
o Other:
Signer is Representing: I I Signer is Representing:
Top of thumb here
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
aae�<._ �<.w,.��a,. a. avas:��: U c�.c..�.c.�.s�. �:v�: ..•,:.a..> - s� .stt.,i zsn i..+aua. a. av .a. n.
State of California l
County of Orange Jy
On 3-9-10 before me, Barbara J. Bender, Notary Public
Date Here Insert Name and Title of the officer '
personally appeared Rebecca Haas -Bates
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(a) whose names) is/afe subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she)'" executed the same in -h her/thelr authorized
capacity(iee), and that by his/herAhaic signature(4 on the
instrument the person(*,, or the entity upon behalf of
which the persons} acted, executed the instrument.
BARBARA J. BENDER
Commission # 1801899 1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
.m Notary Public - California § of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
Orange County ' ' true and corrig
My Comm. Expires Jul 13, 2012
WITNESS ictal s
Signature
Place Notary Seal Above gnature otary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond No. 089 03 501
Document Date: 3-23-10 Number of Pages: Two (2)
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: All American Asphalt
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
❑ Individual
Rebecca Haas -Bates
Corporate Officer—Title(s): _
❑ Partner — ❑Limited 11 General
0 Attorney in Fact
�j Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Top of thumb here
Signer's Name:
❑ Individual
❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s):
❑ Partner —❑ Limited ❑ General _
!❑ Attorney in Fact rI -
Trustee Top of thumb here
E Guardian or Conservator
O Other:
Signer Is Representing:
020(3]19ational Notary Aaaa afion-9350 De Soto Ave.. P.b.eex 2402•ChaL rth, CA 91313-2402,w NalionalNdaryorg Item 45907 Reorder. Call TolbFreet-8W 76.6827
Power of Attorney
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a
corporation of the State of Maryland, by WILLIAM J. MILLS, Vice President, and GREGORY E. MURRAY, Assistant
Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of saidy, which are set forth on
the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and//ffect on the d Mereby nominate,
constitute and appoint William SYRKIN, Rebecca HAAS-BATEgan f Irvine, California,
EACH its true and lawful agent and Attomey-in-Fact, to mak e 'u behalf as surety, and
as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undert ecu ' or undertakings in pursuance of
these presents, shall be as binding upon I d 1 ' ents and purposes, as if they had been
duly executed and acknowled y ele ompany at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their
own proper persons er m on behalf of William SYRKIN, Rebecca HAAS -BATES,
Sergio D. BEC and/ ed April 8, 2008.
The said Assistant " es e e certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI,
Section 2, of the By -L s said Company, and is now in force.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and
affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 25th day of
September, A.D. 2009.
State of Maryland 1 ss..
City of Baltimore
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
By:
Gregory E. Murray Assistant Secretary
William JMills Vice President
On this 25th day of September, A.D. 2009, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly
commissioned and qualified, came WILLIAM J. MILLS, Vice President, and GREGORY E. MURRAY, Assistant Secretary
of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers
described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being
by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid,
and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal
and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of
the said Corporation.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year fust above
written.
Maria D. Adamski Notary Public
My Commission Expires: July 8, 2011
POA -F 012-0033
444q 10 -
L
Maria D. Adamski Notary Public
My Commission Expires: July 8, 2011
POA -F 012-0033
r^
RECEIVE® CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAR 11 2010 CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
CITY OF I EMECULA CITY OF TEMECULA PROJECT NO. PW99-11
IC WORKS DERARTMEND CHANGA PARKWAY PHASE 11 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FEDERAL PROJECT NO. PLHL-5459(014)
This is to certify that ALL AMERICAN AspHALthereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares
to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor,
services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of
the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the
execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection,
construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as CITY OF TEMECULA
PROJECT NO. PW99-11 , PECHANGA PARKWAY PHASE It STREET IMPROVEMENTS,
FEDERAL PROJECT NO. PLHL-5459(014), situated in the City of Temecula, State of California,
more particularly described as follows:
Pechanga Parkway from Temecula Parkway (79 South) to Pechanga Road
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Progress payment
retention
TOTAL:
Dollar Amount to Dispute
$ 355,354.60
61,950.00
921,606.2-3
$1,338,910.83
Pursuant to Public Contract Code §7100, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated: a 9 my
CONTRACTOR
By:
3bi,1':G!.., t
Name and Title
R -t a+onnccisesnvaro.r��av,.a�..�n rm..rmosa.
r:"
Item No. 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Reject all Construction Bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Project for FY2009-10,
Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas Valley Areas,
Project No. PW09-06
PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer - CIP
Chris White, Assistant Engineer- CIP
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Reject all Construction Bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Project for FY2009-10,
Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas ValleyAreas, Project No.
PW09-06
2. Authorize Staff to Re -advertise the Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009-10,
Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas ValleyAreas, Project No.
PW09-06 for Construction Bids
BACKGROUND: The Citywide Slurry Seal Project for FY2009-10, Roripaugh Hills
Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas ValleyAreas, Project No. PW09-06, is an annual project
that will help protect and seal the roadways in the designated areas against water intrusion and
asphalt concrete pavement wearing surface. Ideally, slurry seal is applied every five to seven years
to prolong pavement life and delay more costly rehabilitation measures such as asphalt concrete
overlays or removal and reconstruction. Slurry sealing involves cleaning and sealing the existing
cracks on the roadway surface, applying the Slurry Seal, and restoring pavement delineation.
On September 22, 2009, the City Council approved the Plans and Specifications and authorized
staff to solicit construction bids. On Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 6 bids were opened and publicly read
aloud. The results were as follows:
1. American Asphalt South, Inc. $ 515,161.38
2. Doug Martin Contracting Company, Inc. $ 519,003.38
3. Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. $ 607,782.33
4. Valley Slurry Seal Company $ 680,566.03
1-17
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
00�
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Reject all Construction Bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Project for FY2009-10,
Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas Valley Areas,
Project No. PW09-06
PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer - CIP
Chris White, Assistant Engineer- CIP
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Reject all Construction Bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Project for FY2009-10,
Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas ValleyAreas, Project No.
PW09-06
2. Authorize Staff to Re -advertise the Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009-10,
Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas ValleyAreas, Project No.
PW09-06 for Construction Bids
BACKGROUND: The Citywide Slurry Seal Project for FY2009-10, Roripaugh Hills
Estates, Campos Verdes Tract and Nicolas ValleyAreas, Project No. PW09-06, is an annual project
that will help protect and seal the roadways in the designated areas against water intrusion and
asphalt concrete pavement wearing surface. Ideally, slurry seal is applied every five to seven years
to prolong pavement life and delay more costly rehabilitation measures such as asphalt concrete
overlays or removal and reconstruction. Slurry sealing involves cleaning and sealing the existing
cracks on the roadway surface, applying the Slurry Seal, and restoring pavement delineation.
On September 22, 2009, the City Council approved the Plans and Specifications and authorized
staff to solicit construction bids. On Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 6 bids were opened and publicly read
aloud. The results were as follows:
1. American Asphalt South, Inc. $ 515,161.38
2. Doug Martin Contracting Company, Inc. $ 519,003.38
3. Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. $ 607,782.33
4. Valley Slurry Seal Company $ 680,566.03
Pavement Coatings Company $ 733,336.41
All American Asphalt $ 751,134.41
The project specifications gave bidders the opportunity to bid one of two products: Rubberized
Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (REAS) Type II or Tire Rubber Modified Slurry Seal (TRMSS). Staff
reviewed the submitted bids and found that the lowest bidder, American Asphalt South, Inc.,
submitted a bid for a product not specified in the project specifications -- Rubber Polymer, Modified
Slurry (RPMS). Staff reviewed the specifications for the RPMS and determined thatthe product can
be considered as an equal to TRMSS or REAS. In staff's opinion, all three products -- RPMS,
REAS, or TRMSS -- would satisfy the City's needs for prolonging the service life of the roads.
Public Contract Code 3400 requires that when a public agency is aware of an equal product
manufactured in California, it must name such a product in the specifications. Staff was not aware
of the existence of the RPMS product prior to bidding this project. Since staff did not specify the
RPMS product and did not give bidders the opportunity to bid that equal product, staff is
recommending that the City Council reject all bids and authorize the Department of Public Works to
re -advertise the project for construction bids and include the RPMS product in the specifications
along with the REAS, and TRMSS products.
The Engineer's Estimate for the work was $672,000. The specifications allows for a work schedule
of 35 working days.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. None
Item No. 7
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements and Notice of Completion for De Portola Road
Pavement Rehabilitation, Project No. PW06-10
PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer — Cl P
Jon Salazar, Associate Engineer - CIP
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Accept the construction of the De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project,
Project No. PW 06-10, as complete;
2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the
Performance Bond and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of
10% of the contract amount; and
3. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On February 10, 2009, the City Council awarded a construction
contract to Hardy and Harper, Inc. in the amount of $1,161,000.00 to complete the De Portola Road
Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Project No. PW 06-10.
The project included reconstruction of the De Portola Road roadway between Jedediah Smith Road
and Margarita Road, installation of Asphalt Concrete berms on both sides of the roadway, drainage
improvements, roadway restriping, and utility relocations.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. All work will be warranted for a period of one (1)
year from October 30, 2009, the date the City obtained "beneficial use" of the project improvements.
The retention for this project will be released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code
Section 7107.
FISCAL IMPACT: The De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Project No.
PW06-10 is funded by Measure A and a Federal Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL)
funds. The base amount of the construction contract was $1,161,000.00. Approved contract
change orders totaled $255,681.95, which increased the total construction contract amount to
$1,416,681.95.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590.
3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to Hardy &
Harper. Inc.. 1312 E. Warner Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92705 to perform the following work of improvement:
DE PORTOLA ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. PW06-10
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the
City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on March 23, 2010. That upon said
contract the International Fidelity Insurance Companywas suretyforthe bond given bythe said company
as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows:
DE PORTOLA ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. PW06-10
6. The location of said property is: De Portola Road between Jedediah Smith Drive and
Margarita Road , Temecula, California 92592.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 23 Id day of March. 2010.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
City of Temecula
Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk
I, Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 23 rd day of March, 2010.
City of Temecula
Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk
CAProgram FilesW eevia. ComUo cum ent ConverterkempA962585. do
EXECUTED IN QUADRUPLICATE BOND # 0495222-A
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PREMIUM INCLUDED ON
PERFORMANCE BOND
MAINTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO. PW06-100
DE PORTOLA ROAD PAVEMENT REHABIUTA T(ON
STPL 5459 (017)
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT:
HARDY & HARPER, INC. OF 1312 EAST WARNER AVE, SANTA ANA, CA 92705
NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S
a CORPORATION , hereinafter called Principal, and
(fid Gr wherhera Ca"nidan, Parhwrs1* orkxffi chap
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, 13400 SABRE SPRINGS PARKWAY, SUITE 270, SAN DIEGO, CA 92128
NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY
hereinafter called SURETY, are held and finely bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY SEVEN THOUSAND -FOUR
HUNDRED NINETY TWO-------------------------- DOLLARS and ZERO------------------------------------- CENTS
($137,492.00 --------------- y in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten
(10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the
Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a
certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 10th day of FEBRUARY, 2009, a Copy
of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW06-
10, DE PORTOLA ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STPL 5469 (017).
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER,
against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period;
and
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on _
MARCH 2ND 2010
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION 1S SUCH, that if within one year
from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done
under the terms of said Contract shalt disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work,
and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were
furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this
instrument shall be void.
M-1 0LIPIPAa=MPWhVA%10D0*UandRMall4pea'J1 pe i*
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and
reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attomey's fees incurred by
the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and
included in any judgment rendered.
The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition
to the terns of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications
accompanying the same, shall In any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby
waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the
Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications.
Signed and sealed this 3RD day of MARCH 2010
(Seal)
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY
SURETY
By:
(Name) DWIGHT REILLY
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
.-D .
ji � ✓ �/ X�
Steve Kirschner
Corporate Secretary
(Title)
MAMTENANCE Bono M3 mc�wnossnvssvAs.fooePomunaRMed�4mb�yendoc
as'A ns .t�.vavav- aN.a¢� .av�G�'•,.,a>. _ a IPaP. .�. saL.: • - �.:�'
State of California
County of grange
On
March 4, 2020 before me, Jo -Ann Lyons, Notary Public
Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
personally appeared Steve Kirschner
Name(s) of Signer(s)
MY Conun. FxPires Apr. 17, 2013
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(e) whose name(*) is/am subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/%M/Aeby executed the same in his/Iar/tkVir authorized
capacity(ip6), and that by his/M/a8ir signature(IP) on the
instrument the person(4), or the entity upon behalf of
which the person(*) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
WITNESS y and and o 'cial seal.
Signature
Place Notary Seal AboveSignature of Notary P lic
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond
Document Date: Marh�z 2010 Number of Pages: 2
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Dwight Reilly
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signers Name: RtPvP K rarhnwr
Signer's Name:
IQ
❑ Individual
F Corporate Officer—Title(s): Vice ProgidPnt
❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s):
❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General _ _
❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
❑ Attorney in Fact
MY Conun. FxPires Apr. 17, 2013
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(e) whose name(*) is/am subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/%M/Aeby executed the same in his/Iar/tkVir authorized
capacity(ip6), and that by his/M/a8ir signature(IP) on the
instrument the person(4), or the entity upon behalf of
which the person(*) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
WITNESS y and and o 'cial seal.
Signature
Place Notary Seal AboveSignature of Notary P lic
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond
Document Date: Marh�z 2010 Number of Pages: 2
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Dwight Reilly
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signers Name: RtPvP K rarhnwr
Signer's Name:
❑ Individual
❑ Individual
F Corporate Officer—Title(s): Vice ProgidPnt
❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s):
❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General _ _
❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
❑ Attorney in Fact
❑ Attorney in Fact
❑ Trustee
Top of thumb here
❑ Trustee
Top of thumb here
❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:
❑ Other:
Signer Is Representing:
y A Harv. Inc
Signer Is Representing: -
02007 National Notary Association- 9350 De. Soto Ave., P.O.B. 2402 -Chatsworth, CA 913132402 -www. NallonaiNotaryong torn #5907 Roomer: Call Toll -Free 1-800-876-6827
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ORANGE
On March 3rd, 2010 before me, ALLISON RITTO, NOTARY PUBLIC
(insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared DWIGHT REILLY
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hefshe/ttrey executed the same in
his,'„ M ei authorized ca acit
p y(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official sealAuiSDlo RITro
2¢ F ,
f�.. Commission
182
NotaTra Public ,9
nia
My COMM. nge County
Signature (Seal) Expires Dec 23 201
AL ISON RITTO
62-7200 POWER OF ATTORNEY
its true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact to execute; seal and deliver for and on its behalf as surety,any and all bonds and undertakings contracts of indemnity and
other ,writings obligatory in the nature thereof,. which are or may be allowed required or permitted by law, stature, rule, re��uillatron, contract or otberwise, and
the execution of such instrument(S)in pursuance of these: presents, shall be as binding upon the said INI'F.RNATiUNAL FIDELITY INSURANCE
COMPANY as fully and amply, to all intents, and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by its regularly elected officers at its
principal office.
This Power of Attorneyy is executed, and maybe revoked, pursuant to and by authority. of Article 3 -Section 3, of the By -Laws adopted by the Board of
Directors of INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting called and held on the 7th day of February, 1974,
The President or any vice President, Executive; Vice President, Secretary of Assistant Secretary, shall: have power and authority
(1) To appoint Attorneys -in -fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the Seal of the Company thereto, bonds and
undertakings, contracts of indemnity and;other writings; obligatory in the nature thereof and,
(2) To remove, at any time, any such attorney -in fact and revoke the authority given.
Further, this Power of Attorne is signed and sealed by facsimile pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors of said Company adopted at a meeting
duly called and field on the 29th day of April, 1982 of which the following is tme excerpt:
Now therefore the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any suchpower of attorney or any. certificate relating thereto by
facsimile, and any such power of: attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and bindingg upon the Company and any
such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures. and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the: Company in the future with respect; to any
bond.. or undertaking to which it. is attached.
TY l/yS IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this instrument to be
�\ O- & signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officer, this 16th day of October, A.D. 2007.
O�hOl �f, INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY
c SEAL
r Z j 904 STATE OF NEW JERSEY
p ' County of Essex
1Hi
Secretary
On this 16th day of October 2007, before a came the individual who executed thee�rrecedingg instrmnent, to me personal] known, and, being by me duly
authorized officer of the INTERNA'x'10NAL FIDELITY INSURANCE C�MPANYi that the seal affixed to
sworn, said the is is the therein described and P y g y y
said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said om an - thaf the said Corporate Seal and his signature were dui affixed b order of the Board of Directors of
said Company. ;<
rON
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed my Official Seal,
at the City of Newark, New Jersey the day and year first above written.
RY N _
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW06-10
DE PORTOLA ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
STPL 5459 (017)
This is to certify thatHardv & Harper, zAbereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares
to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor,
services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of
the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the
execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection,
construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW06-10,
DE PORTOLA ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STPL 5459 (017), situated in the City of
Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: -
DE PORTOLA ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD
AND MARGARITA ROAD
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description Dollar Amount to Dispute
N/A
Q1M
Pursuant to Public Contract Code §7100, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts,demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated: 3/3/10 By
Steve Kirschner- Vice President
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R-1 RAMPRodecraPWOWW06-1e oeRerWand R"1SP=UPVUaSP=.dX
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FINAL REPORT UTILIZATION OF DISADVANTAGED BUSINESSES
PROJECT NO. PW06-10
DE PORTOLA ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STPL 5459 (017)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LOCAL ASSISTANCE FEDERAL - FINAL REPORT - UTILIZATION OF
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DBE), FIRST-TIER
SUBCONTRACTORS
Revised 8/04 -
CONTRACT NUMBERCOUNTY
vuyina. pms ene c.py. wee mauaea m me nepon or eapnnmmres.
LOCATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO.
ADMINISTERING AGENCY
CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE
PW06-10 Riv
rsde
Temecu
a C PAvin
STPL-5459 017
it of Temecula
1 31 10
a,�larltwectsvvmmwvos-to oaronaawaewets,�mlroumsp�,.ao�
1312 E. Warner Avenue
local
UNT
Hardy & Harper, Inc.
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(For agenoYro complete)
$
$1,374920.49
-
DESCRIPTION OF.
DBE CERT.
CONTRACT PAYMENTS
FEDERAL SHARE $
CONTRACT
WORK PERFORMED
SUBCONTRACTOR NAME
NUMBER & EXP.
DBE
DBE (NON-
DBE
DATE WORK
DATE OF FINAL
ITEM No.
AND MATERIAL
-AND BUSINESS ADDRESS
DATE
NON -DBE
DBE
MINORITY
(MINORITY
PROVIDED
(MINORITY)
WOMEN
WOMEN
COMPLETE
PAYMENT
N/A Did GDod
Faith
Effort ldvertising
for
Project
$ N/A. 19/00 TOTAL PAYMENTS $ -0- $ -0- $ -O- $ -0- Is —0—
ORIGINALDUE COMMITMENT Onginal DBE% DBE GOAL ATTAINMENT 0%
List all First Tier Subcontractors and all Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) regardless of tier, whether or not the firms were originally listed for goal credit. If actual DBE utilization (or item of work) was different than that
approved at time of award, provide comments on the back of the form. List actual amount paid to each of the DBE even if different than originally listed for goal credit.
CO U REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER
DATE
RESIDENT PROJECT ENGINEERS SIGNATURE
BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER
DATE
AGENCY
visnieuuwr. l V
vuyina. pms ene c.py. wee mauaea m me nepon or eapnnmmres.
,.
(2)
Copy- local agency files
-
ExRiBIT 17-F FINAL REPORT UTILIZATION.OF DISADVANTAGED BUSINESSES
UTILIZATION
U- 1
a,�larltwectsvvmmwvos-to oaronaawaewets,�mlroumsp�,.ao�
Item No. 8
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Andre O'Hara, Police Chief
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Resolution of Support for District Attorney's Office Enforcement of Exisiting
Violent Sexual Offender Laws (At the Request of Mayor Comerchero and
Council Member Naggar)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE COMBINED EFFORTS OF THE
TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR STRICT
ENFORCEMENT OF EXISTING VIOLENT SEXUAL OFFENDER
LAWS
BACKGROUND: Mayor Jeff Comerchero and Council Member Mike Naggar have
requested the City Council consider adoption of the attached Resolution that supports the
District Attorney's Office efforts to strictly enforcing existing violent sexual predator laws. Due to
recent, high profile cases involving convicted sexual offenders, this issue has focused attention
on the status of existing State laws that provide for severe penalties for offenders convicted of
violent sexual crimes.
The Temecula Police Department aggressively enforces all existing laws that relate to violent
sexual assaults and this action supports both the Temecula Police Department and the
Riverside County District Attorney's Office for strict enforcement to include severe penalties for
those convicted of violating these laws. The attached Resolution of Support will further
demonstrate the City Council's commitment to law enforcement and the District Attorney's
Office efforts in seeking the maximum penalties under existing laws.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Support
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE COMBINED
EFFORTS OF THE TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT
AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE FOR STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF EXISTING
LAWS RELATING TO VIOLENT SEXUAL OFFENDERS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula places the highest priority on public safety; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula supports the Police Department's commitment
to aggressively enforcing both Jessica's Law and Megan's Law; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula supports the efforts of the Temecula Police
Department and the Riverside County District Attorney's Office relating to enforcement
of existing laws relating to violent sexual offenders; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula supports prosecution to the fullest extent of the
current law and is committed to assisting the Riverside County District Attorney and the
Temecula Police Department in collective efforts to strengthen those laws and keep
violent offenders off our streets: and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula recognizes and supports the District Attorney's
discretion in utilizing the most punitive charging guidelines as it pertains to violent
sexual offenders; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula supports the judicial system in sentencing
convicted criminals that have shown violent tendencies in the commission of their
crimes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Temecula supports
the Riverside County District Attorney's Office Strict Enforcement of Existing Laws
Relating to Violent Sexual Offenders.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 23rd day of March, 2010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of March, 2010, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IG1 011�Ko1l1►NllNdiIAdi1:l4:&1
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
Item No. 9
ACTION MINUTES
of
MARCH 9, 2010
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
The Temecula Community Services District Meeting convened at 7:29 PM.
CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
13 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Director Comerchero
made the motion; it was seconded by Director Edwards and electronic vote
reflected unanimous approval
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve the action minutes of February 23, 2010.
14 Innerstate Dance Project Grant - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Director
Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Director Edwards and
electronic vote reflected unanimous approval
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve the estimated grant Revenue in the Old Town Community Theater
Budget for the Innerstate Dance Project in the amount of $15,000;
14.2 Appropriate $15,000 in expenditures from the OTC Theater Grant Revenue for
the Innerstate Dance Project program;
14.3 Authorize the General Manager, on behalf of the Board of Directors, to take all
actions necessary and convenient to carry out and implement the Innerstate
Dance Project, and to administer the TCSD's obligations, responsibilities, and
duties to be performed under the Project, including but not limited to, approval
and execution on behalf of the TCSD of the Innerstate Dance Project with the
ODC Theater, certificates and other similar agreements and documents as
necessary and convenient for the implementation of the project.
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Parker invited the community to the Special Games Event,
Saturday, March 13, 2010, at 10:00 A.M., at the Chaparral High School football stadium,
advising that the event has 100 registered participants along with 200 support volunteers.
CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
At 7:31 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, March 23, 2010, at 5:30 PM., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing
at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Item No. 10
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM: Herman D. Parker
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Santa's Electric Light Parade and Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony in Old
Town
PREPARED BY: Julie Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1) Approves the relocation of the Annual Santa's Electric Light Parade to Old Town Front
Street, from its current location on Jefferson Avenue, and:
2) Approves the relocation of the Annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony to the Civic
Center in Old Town Temecula, from its current location at the Temecula Duck Pond.
BACKGROUND: The Annual Santa's Electric Light Parade has been held in
Temecula for the past 17 years attracting as many as 15,000 spectators and participants. Over
the past 16 years the parade has been held on Jefferson Avenue between Del Rio and
Overland Roads. The parade has been a huge success and is well received by the community
and has become one of Temecula's premiere special events. At Council's request, staff has
evaluated relocating the parade to a new location in Old Town on Front Street. Although the
parade route would be shorter and have height restrictions, staff feels that the parade can be
held in the Old Town area successfully, with the route beginning at Santiago Road and running
north on Front Street concluding at Moreno Road. The Old Town area will provide a wonderful
ambience and small town feel to this special event.
Our Annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony has been held at the Temecula Duck Pond for
the past several years. It has become a very popular event with wonderful refreshments,
caroling, a visit from Santa, and the lighting of the Christmas Tree. Staff is recommending
moving the Annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony to the Old Town Civic Center Plaza to
begin a new tradition in the heart of the downtown area. The plaza and Town Square provide
more space, better parking and add to the Old Town holiday festivities. The existing "live"
Christmas Tree at the Temecula Duck Pond at the corner of Ynez and Rancho California Road,
will continue to be lit during the holiday season. An artificial Christmas Tree will be assembled
and decorated for the lighting ceremony in the Old Town Civic Center Plaza.
By relocating both of these special events to our Old Town area it creates a more vibrant
downtown and builds synergy in the Old Town area during the holiday season. These two
special events will complement existing programs and enhance our downtown tourist and retail
district.
FISCAL IMPACT: Moving Santa's Electric Light Parade will have no fiscal impact to
the TCSD. Staff is pursuing the donation of a 32' artificial outdoor Christmas Tree for display in
the Civic Center Town Square area. This tree may require decorating, minor enhancements
and storage. We estimate this cost to be $18,000. These funds will be included in the
upcoming TCSD Annual Budget.
Item No. I I
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements and Notice of Completion for the Temecula
Community Center Expansion Project No. PW06-05
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Amer Attar, Principal Engineer — Cl P
William Becerra, Associate Engineer —CIP
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1. Accept the Temecula Community Center Expansion, Project No. PW06-05 as
complete; and
2. Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance
Bond and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the
contract amount; and
3. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On November 18, 2008, The Temecula Community Services District Board of Directors
awarded the project's construction contract to Erickson Hall Construction Company in the
amount of $1,184,000.00 and authorized a contingency in the amount of $118,400.00, which is
10% of the contract amount for a total authorization of $1,302,400.
This Project consisted of the construction of a 3500+ square foot, single story, wood frame
building. The building's exterior is fiber cement siding with a standing seam metal roof. The
interior contains an office space, an activity room and public restrooms. The site work included
all wet and dry utilities, below ground drainage systems, concrete, interlocking pavers, asphalt
parking areas and landscape.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. All work will be warranted for a
period of one (1) year from the date of substantial completion (September 25, 2009). The
retention for this project was released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code
Section 7107.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Temecula Community Center Expansion project is a Capital
Improvement Program project and is funded through a Community Development Block Grant,
Development Impact Fees and Quimby. The total construction cost was $1,242,053.63, which
is comprised of the original contract amount of $1,184,000.00 and an expended contingency of
$58,053.63.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590.
3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to Erickson
Hall Construction Co.. Inc. 500 Corporate Drive, Escondido, CA 92029 to perform the following work of
improvement:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT NO. PW06-05
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the
City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on March 23, 2010. That upon said
contract the Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America was surety for the bond given by the said
company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT NO. PW06-05
6. The location of said property is: 28910 Pujol Street, Temecula, California 92592.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 23 Id day of March, 2010.
City of Temecula
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk
I, Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 23 rd day of March, 2010.
City of Temecula
Susan W. Jones MMC, City Clerk
CAProgram FilesW eevia. ComUo cum ent ConverterkempA962592. do
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
MAINTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO. PW06-05
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT:
Bond #105174494A
Erickson Hall Construction Co.. Inc., 500 Corporate Drive, CA 92029
NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S
a Corporation , hereinafter called Principal, and
(fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership or individual)
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, 9325 Sky Park Court, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92123
NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY
hereinafter called SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of One Hundred Eighteen Thousand Four
Hundred DOLLARS and NO/100
CENTS ($ 118.400 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than
ten (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the
Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a
certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 180' day of November, 2008, a copy of
which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW06-05,
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION.
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER,
against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period;
and
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and the final estimate was approved on
September 25'" 2009.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year
from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done
under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work,
and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were
furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this
instrument shall be void.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and
reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by
MAINTENANCE BOND M-1 R:ICIPDROdECTSMO6Ww060sreawmaC�rnyC�ExparsiontuddinyBid DmUCCfed aemaRlhoc
the Gty of Temecula In successfully enforcing thls obligation, all to be taxed as costs and
Included In any judgment rendered.
The Surety hereby stipulates and agnea that no change, extension of time, aderatlon, or addition
to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications
accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obllgatlona on this bond, and It does hereby
walve notice of any such change, extension of time, atteraWn, or addition to the terms of the
Contract, or to the work, or to the Specificationa.
Signed and seated this 14th day of November 2003.
(Seal)
Travelers Casualty and Surety
Cc in of America
SUR
SY
Penny E. Kelley
(Name)
Attomev-in-Fact
(Tide)
APPRO D AS TO FORM:
Pe7r M, Thorson, City Attorney
Erickson -Nall Construction Co.
PRINCIPAL
By:
01tie)
WK EWICEBM W2 WmKu
CALIFORNIA•ACKNOWLEDGMENT
9t' Vt'n"..{... ✓ •>/9:'. i:..i'�h. V �•ir:..r:..>. VN..>:. �."9<:9.:9'.9C..'..>V, y::•.h: V>:n!'...R..C.S("n%5..�.9M.Ft 9f.�.t..y(' t;�t M:Si..:.Nh ..>.9t.,.S...l
State of California l
County of Sen Diego J)
On Nov 14 before me, Johanna Smith NoPublic
nw tary a
personally appeared Penny E�K_0M.
iwtiG1 a'6pti u
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(o whose names) ism subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that
kaV olftq executed the same in 1dc/herfWr authorized
JOHANNA SMITH capacity(1w), and that by ksUrAbec sigt,ature(t on fine
COMW #1750064 instrument the persons), or the entity upon behalf of
NOTARYPl1BLIC-CAUFORNIA V which the person(%) acted, executed the instrument.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY Ci
MY Cortnnasion EVm —
JUNE 10, 2011 1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of Califomia that the foregoing paragraph Is
true and coned.
WITNESS my hand qr;d official
Signature v%at
OPTIONAL
Tho,o ffm nANmation below B not required by law, it may prate wM arable to rSom rtlty4p off CIe oocun e w
nd
aooW protest hau&*M remun
oval and reasaGent or Nils to anodfer doaxnant.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signers)
Signer's Name:
❑ Individual
❑ Corporate Office—Title(s): —
❑ Partner — O Limited O General
O Attorney In Fact
❑ Trustee
O Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:
Signer Is Representing:
r,�xr na;-aswtan
nL 5'.SliCn :.
Number of Pages:
Signer's Name:
O Individual
❑ Corporate Officer — Tiile(s): _
O Partner —O Limited O General
O Attomey in Fact
O Trustee
O Guardian or Conservator
O Other:
Signer Is Representing:
r . •� -' • '�` WAnnaNti: IHI> nmtn IN tri runnel u rvvKw nrrrrw� Tree neat Mtvcn
TRAVELERS J POWER OF ATTORNEY
earmlagto , Casualty Company St. Purl Guardian lawraocc Company
Fidelity and Guaranty trouirstace Company St. Paul Mercury Imserwa Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Uaderwrkers, tar. 7yavelers Casualty and Sully Company
Seaboard Surety Company Tsavelen Casualty amd Surety Company of America
St. Paul Fire all Marine Insurance Company United Suter Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Attorney -In Fut No. 217991 mak Na. 0 0 2 4 6 7 3 0 4
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESEN117S: That Saboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Stats of New York, mat Sc Paul
Fre and Marim Insurance Company. St. Paul Guadim Insurance Company and St Paul Memory Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws
of the State of Minnesota, that Farmington Casualty Company. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Compam of Ameeiu are
corporations duly Merited under the laws of the Stec M Connecticut, that United Styes Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the
Iowa of the State of Maryland, that Fidelity ad Ouanety Insurance Company is t corporation duly organized under the laws of the Sure of to+a, sed that Fidelity and
Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under she laws of the Sure of Wisconsin (herein cealketivaly called the `Coanpa ics'). and the
the Companies do hereby make. constitute and appoint
Christine A. Paterson, Penny E. Kelley, James Baldassare Jr., Lawrence F. McMahon, James R Sommerville, and America San Martn .
of the City of San Diego State of California , their one all lawful Anomey(s)-in-Fact,
each in their separate capacity if more elan one is named above, to sign, execute, regi and acknowledge any and all bonds, mcogniz nces, conditional undertakings and
other writings obligatory in the naurc dnaeof on behalf of the Compania in their business of gusranttting du 6dshty of persons, guaranteeing the performance of
contract; and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings requined or pernomtd maty actiau or proceedings allowed by law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the C anies have caused this instrument to be June 2008
signed and then co 25th
g corporate coats m be lureto affszed. Nis
day of
Farmington Casuatty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance: Company
Fidelity and Guaranty tasurance Underarriters, Inc
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Karim Insurance Company
St Paid Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury la Company
TraMers Casualty and Surety Company
Travelers Casualty and Surely Company at America
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
SaElr - 'dJ yrs, i•„% +''.,,W p'`M� ���
c teal a�ansam i� but, v,.ao
,77
t851 .A.aa 3.
Sutc of Connecticut
City of Hartford as.
By:
A-10,nionrpsm.Dior ate president
On this the 25th day of June pefare roe persauily appeared George W. Thompson, who acknowledged himself
a be the Senior Yncs Praldent of Farmington Casualty Company, Fidelity all Guaranty Insurance Company, Fidelity, and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc..
Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fre and Maritsa Lawrance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury insurance: Company, Travelers
Casualty all Surety Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, and United Sura Fidelity and Guaranty Company, sed that he, w such, being
authorized so w do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein remained by signing on behalf of the cmpuratiom by himself a a duly authorized oP,icer.
p,Tiy
In Witness Whereof, I hercuruo set my band and official seal. TAR
My Conmission aspires the Jfkh day of June. 2011. {s 'OfrEU�+ e
58440-5-07 Printed in U.S.A.
�
Qlu% 01.
Marie C. Tenea,rn. Nuuuy Put he
WAWW: THS POWER OF ATM"EY IS INVAID WfDIOUT THE RED BDRPER
This Power of Anormy is granted under and by the sudsaity of the followiag resolutions adopted by the Bards of Director of Fa n ingma Ceuaky Company, Fidelity
AM Guaranty Insutarsa Company, Fidelity and Guranty, Wunna Underwriters. Inc. Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Inmrance Company,
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company. St. Pad Memory Issaaaace Company. Travelers Casualty and Suety Company. Travelers, Casualty and Surety Company of
America, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, which ne olunons art now in full force add elfin, reading as follows:
RESOLVED, the the Chairman. Use presides, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice Resident. any Senior Vice President, say Vitt President any Sacrad Vice
President. the Treasurer, any Asaistaot Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may appoint At omeys,-ln-Fatt Aad Agear to act for and on behalf
of the Campaoy and nary give such appointee such authority as his or her certificate of authority may prescribe to sign with the Company's name and real with the
Company's seal bonds, reeognizerms, contracts of Indemnity, and edits wirings obligatory in the nature of a bond, neoognizaatt, or conditsiml undertaking. and any
of said officers or the Board of Directors at gay mute may remove toy such appointee and revoke she power given him or ha; And it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chairman, the Presides, any Vice Chairman, my Etecutive Vitt president, my Senior Vitt President or any Vim Praidcs may
delegate all or my paf of Use foregoing authority to one or most officers or employees of this Company, provided that each such delegation is in writing and a copy
Ihc"f is filed in the office of the Secretary: and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that any bond, recognizance, contract of indemnity, w writing obligatory in the nature of a bond. recognizance, a conditional undertaking
shall be raid and binding upon the Company when (a) sigrxd by the President, any Vice Chairman, army Esecutive Vitt President, my Senior Vice President wary Vice
President. my Second Via president the Treasurer, my Assdunt Treasurer, the Corporate Smsetary or my Assistant Secretary and duly attested and se" with the
Company s Ral by a Smmtary or Awsunt Secretary; or (b) duly executed (under seal, if required) by use a mac Attomeys-imleact and Agents pursuant to the power
peseibed in his or her certificate or their certificates of authority or by one or more Company officers pursuant to a wihen delegation of authority; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the signature of each of the following officer: President, my Executive Vice President, my Senior Vice President, Any Vice Presid"L
my Assirmr Vice President any Secretary. my Assistant Secretary, and the Rat of tis Company may be affixed by facsimile to Any power of attorney o so my cenifscate
relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents. Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys:m-Fact for purposes only of aecuting and arresting bonds and
undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof and Any such power of money a certificate having such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be
valid and binding upon the Company and my such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile scat shall be valid and binding on the
Company in the future with respect to my bond or understanding to vhich it is aruched.
L Kuri M- Johanson, the undersigned. Assistant $mercury, of F'arrningtoo Casualty Company. Fidelity and Guumty Insurance Company. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance
Underwriters, Inc., Seaboard Surety Company. Sc Paul Fire and Maine tnsu%u Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
Company, Travelers Casualty And Surety Company. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. -And United Stain Fidelity and Gummty Company do hereby
certify the the above and fotgoing is a true and correct copy of the "a of Attorney executed by said Companies, which is in full force and effect Aad has no been
revoked.
NOV 14 2008
LN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affited the seats of said Companies dun day of
Kai M. Johann Assistant Sccretey
�.�,• 1971
art, t o i;' t O
1951 gtse 14'. SELL �O get 0
smrr7-
To verify the authenticity of dus Power of Anamy, call 1-800-421-1886 or comet us at www.travelersbood.com. Please refer to the Attorney to -Fact number, the
above-named individuals and the details of the bad to which the pswe is attached.
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW06-05
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION
This is to certify thatfpi -14W 100 (iTf!**414h, (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares
to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor,
services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of
the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the
execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection,
construction, nr repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW06-05,
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION, situated in the City of Temecula, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Turrjc,al � %fY mUN i (�Vter
DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK HERE
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contract Code §7100, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
CONTRACTOR
Dated: t I �'lU By:
Signature
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R-1 RICIPPROJECTSIPWO61PW06-05TemmWaCo uno Centr ipanion\BridingMDasITCCW bidd%s R1.dm
Item No. 12
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Award the Construction Contract for the Temecula Community Center
Expansion - Phase 2, Renovation of Historical Buildings, Project No. PW06-05
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Amer Attar, Principal Engineer — Cl P
William Becerra, Associate Engineer —CIP
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors;
Award a construction contract for the Temecula Community Center Expansion -
Phase 2, Renovation of Historical Buildings, Project No. PW06-05 to Caltec
Corp. in the amount of $520,950.00.
2. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $130,237.50, which is equal to 25% of the contract
amount.
3. Approve the acceleration and transfer of $159,200 from the Capital Improvement
Budget of FY2010-2011 for the Old Town Gymnasium to the current FY2009-
2010 for the Temecula Community Center Expansion - Phase 2, Renovation of
Historical Buildings, Project No. PW06-05.
4. Make a finding that the Temecula Community Center Expansion - Phase 2,
Renovation of Historical Buildings project is exempt from Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees.
BACKGROUND: On September 22, 2009, the Board of Directors approved the
Construction Plans and Specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit
construction bids for the Temecula Community Center Expansion - Phase 2, Renovation of
Historical Buildings, Project No. PW06-05. This Project includes the renovation of the Escalier
House (1,227 square feet) and Barn (800 square feet). The house will be converted into usable
office space and the barn will be used for storage. Work also includes the installation of wet
and dry utilities, below ground drainage systems, landscape and irrigation, accessible site work,
and an asphalt concrete parking lot.
Due to the multitude of unknowns in the renovation historic buildings, staff is requesting a 25%
contingency for unforeseen conditions encountered during construction.
Eleven (11) bids were received and publicly opened on Tuesday, March 4, 2010. The results
were as follows:
1.
Caltec Corporation.
$
520,950.00
2.
Sean Malek Engineering and Construction
$
548,000.00
3.
AVI-CON Inc.
$
567,000.00
4.
Dalke & Sons
$
588,480.00
5.
3D Construction Inc.
$
619,800.00
6.
Allstar Services Corporation
$
623,118.00
7.
R Moody Construction Inc.
$
634,570.00
8.
Prava Construction Services.
$
639,145.00
<Engineer's Estimate>
$
640,000.00
9.
Hamel Contracting
$
677,600.00
10.
Mark Sauer
$
710,000.00
Rasmussen Brothers Construction Inc. submitted a lump sum bid in the amount of $515,630.00.
Their bid was deemed "unresponsive" because their bid sheet included an aggregate amount
for the entire project under a single bid item. The contractor wrote the word "included" on line
items of two of the three items in the bid sheet instead of providing a cost for those items.
"Instruction to Bidders" Item 2 (k) on Page IB -2 of the project's specifications states "Bidders
shall give unit prices for each and all of the items set forth. No aggregate bids will be
considered. Any bid item left blank in the Schedule of Prices will deem the entire bid
unresponsive and the bid will be disqualified." A copy of the bid summary is available for review
in the office of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found Caltec Corporation of Westminster, CA to be the
lowest responsible bidder for this project. Based on the documentation submitted with their bid,
Caltec Corporation has done similar work for other agencies.
The specifications allow one hundred twenty (120) working days for the completion of the
project. Since this project is funded, in part, by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds, the bids have been reviewed by the Economic Development Agency of Riverside County
as administrator of the CDBG Federal program and the District is cleared to award the contract.
In order to fully fund the project it will be necessary to accelerate $159,200 from the FY10-11
budget year for the Old Town Gymnasium project and transfer these funds to the current FY09-
10 fiscal year renovation project.
The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is an element of the Riverside
County Integrated Project (RCIP) to conserve open space, nature preserves and wildlife to be
set aside in some areas. It is designed to protect over 150 species and conserve over 500,000
acres in Western Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a permittee to the MSHCP and as
such is required to abide by the Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Fee Remittance and
Collection Policy adopted by Resolution 07-04 on September 10, 2007. The RCA is a joint
regional authority formed by the County and the Cities to provide primary policy direction for
implementation of the MSHCP.
As of July 1, 2008 the RCA requires that locally funded Capital Improvement Projects contribute
applicable MSHCP fees within 90 -days of construction contract award. Fees outside the public
right of way are calculated on a cost per acre of disturbed area basis, while fees for typical right-
of-way improvements projects are 5% of construction costs. Projects funded by TUMF or
Measure A are exempt from MSHCP fees, as those programs contribute directly to the MSHCP.
The Temecula Community Center Expansion site will occupy land previously used as a paved
parking lot, therefore there is no new disturbed area subject to the per acre MSHCP fees. As
such, the project is exempt.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Temecula Community Center Expansion - Phase 2,
Renovation of Historical Buildings is a Capital Improvement Program project and is funded
through a Community Development Block Grant, Development Impact Fees and Quimby. With
the recommended acceleration and transfer of Community Development Block Grant Funds in
the amount of $159,200.00 from Old Town Gymnasium Account Number 210-190-186,
sufficient funds will be available in the Temecula Community Center Expansion Account
Number 210-190-197. The table below shows the recommended actions.
APPROPRIATION DETAILS
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Contract
2. Project Location
3. Project Description
4. Old Town Gymnasium Project Description
Acceleration &
Account No.
Account No.
FY09-10
Transfer from
210-165-197
Adjusted
210-165-197-
Balance
210-190-186
Transfers
Balance
FY10-11
5801 FF&E
$
20,000.00
$
0.00
$
0.00
$
20,000.00
5801 Admin
$
61,216.00
$
111,796.00
$
5,009.00
$
178,021.00
5802 Design
$
9.00
$
0.00
($
9.00)
$
0.00
5804 Constr.
$
604,596.00
$
47,404.00
$
0.00
$
652,000.00
5805 Constr. Eng
$
30,599.00
$
0.00
($
5,000.00)
$
25,599.00
TOTALS:
$
716,420.00
$
159,200.00
$
0.00
$
875,620.00
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Contract
2. Project Location
3. Project Description
4. Old Town Gymnasium Project Description
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PWO6-05
TEMECULA COMMUNITYCENTER EXPANSION - PHASE 2, RENOVATION OF
HISTORICAL BUILDINGS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 23rd day of March 2010 by
and between the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT', and Caltec Corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually
agree as follows:
1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW06-05, TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION — PHASE 2,
RENOVATION OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all
modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard Plans and
Specifications, (latest edition), issued by the California Department of Transportation
where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest
version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all
supplements as written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc (hereinafter,
"Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions,
and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW06-05, TEMECULA COMMUNITY
CENTER EXPANSION — PHASE 2, RENOVATION OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS.
Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
BNi Building News
Division of BNi Publications, Inc.
1612 South Clementine St.
Anaheim, California 92802
(714) 517-0970
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW06-
05, TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION — PHASE 2, RENOVATION OF
HISTORICAL BUILDINGS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW06-05, TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION—PHASE 2,
RENOVATION OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by DISTRICT.
3. DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be
furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and
subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives.
4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and
CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the
sum of: Five Hundred Twenty Thousand Nine hundred Fifty DOLLARS and
No/100CENTS ($ 520,950.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed One Hundred
Twenty1( 20) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by
DISTRICT. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by
DISTRICT.
5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the Board of Directors,
except that the General Manager is hereby authorized by the Board of Directors to make,
by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the
contingency as established by the Board of Directors.
6. PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
A. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the Deputy Director of Public Works a schedule of values allocated to the various
portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to
substantiate its accuracy as the Deputy Director of Public Works may require.
This schedule, as approved by the Deputy Director of Public Works, shall be used
as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
B. Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT, the CONTRACTOR shall
be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the DISTRICT on
forms provided by the DISTRICT.
C. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the
work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
D. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty
(30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
E. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code. a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory and the project
is more than 50% complete. The District hereby delegates its authority to reduce
the retention to the Deputy Director of Public Works.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES — EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to DISTRICT the sum
of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by DISTRICT. Within ten
(10) calendar days of the occurrence of such delay, CONTRACTOR shall give written
notice to DISTRICT. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the occurrence of the delay,
CONTRACTOR shall provide written documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to
DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR'S failure to provide such notice and documentation shall
constitute CONTRACTOR'S waiver, discharge, and release of such delay claims against
DISTRICT.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for compensation
as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount
of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release
of all claims against the DISTRICT related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
9. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are available from the California
Department of Industrial Relations' Internet Web Site at http://www.dir.ca.gov.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
DISTRICT, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for
each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in
violation of the provisions of the Contract.
10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT,
CITY, and/or AGENCY its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability,
injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to
property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the
operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising
through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT for
any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against the
project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final
payments due to the DISTRICT.
12. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to DISTRICT's
employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or
securing favorable treatment with respect thereto.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any District officer or
employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and
Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its
employ has been employed by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice
Inviting Bids.
14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
15. NOTICE TO DISTRICT OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has
knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the
timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to DISTRICT.
16. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the
DISTRICT.
17. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by DISTRICT and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plants of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
18. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
19. GOVERNING LAW. The DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of
the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any
litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal
district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of
litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined
by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
20. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of
a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract or the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no
board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether
contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business
of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest
comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all
such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such
interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with
Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the
Government Code of the State of California.
21. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the DISTRICT addressed as follows:
Mailing A ddress:
Greg Butler
Director of Public Works
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula. CA 92589-9033
Street Address:
Greg Butler
Director of Public Works
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula. CA 92590
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
DATED:
ATTEST:
CONTRACTOR
Caltec Corporation
8723 Westminster Blvd., Suite 2
Westminster, CA 92683
(714) 717-1638
a
Hamid Abghari
President
a
Hamid Abghari
Secretary
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
a
Chuck Washington, President
PROJECT LOCATION
Project Title: TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION
INR:
FeuxvnLoeznve
x
€am
�Fz
O
PO
eS,Q' PppOP
aF
RIDGE PARK DR
L�
pP
L
6�
m� c��FN
4�ep
OSS
?phR
�c00
T
hF'�
V, �RRpO
h�
h�
4�
h
U
b
O
'N"T NGO R
ga
0
QM�No
0
e
R0
JP`Y
oar��
0
0
N
A
A
F� Php
INR:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Title: TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION PRIORITY: III
Project Type: Infrastructure
Description: Add 3,653 square feet of space adjacent to the Temecula Community Center to accommodate additional human services programs.
Also includes site preparation, utilities, and tenant improvements for the relocation of the Escalier house and barn.
Department: Community Services — Account No. 210.190.197
Scope of Project: Project will include the design and construction of an additional 3,653 square feet of office and meeting space.
Benefit: Project will provide additional space for human services for the community.
Project Cost:
Actuals
Total Project
to Date
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Cost
Administration
$
131,489
$
196,287
$
327,776
Construction
$
339,425
$
1,652,236
$
1,991,661
Construction Engineering
$
8,602
$
51,398
$
60,000
Design
$
234,808
$
53,755
$
288,563
Fixtures/Fum/Equip
$
20,000
$
20,000
Totals
$
714,324
$
1,973,676 $ $ $ $
$
2,688,000
Source of Funds:
CD13G*
$
612,834
$
1,677,817
$
2,290,651
DIF(Parks and Recreation)
$
295,859
$
295,859
DIF (Quimby)
$
101,490
$
101,490
Total Funding:
$
714,324
$
1,973,676 $ $ $ $
$
2,688,000
Future O & M Cost: $ 1,000 Annually
*TCC Expansion Project $1,740,651, and Temecula Community Pantry Project $550,000
Hip]
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Title:
Project Type:
Description:
Department:
Scope of Project:
Benefit:
OLD TOWN GYMNASIUM
Infrastructure
PRIORITY: 11
Design and construct an 8,500 square foot gymnasium to be located adjacent to the Boys & Girls Club. Project may be done in
two phases depending upon timing of funding. Phase I to include parking lot, underground utilities, and foundation.
Community Services - Account No. 210.190.186
Design and construct a gymnasium that will include a full-sized basketball court, bleacher seating for approximately 200
spectators, restrooms, storage, and a small office.
Project will provide additional recreational facilities for City residents and with a joint -use agreement, this facility will provide
additional activities for the Boys & Girls Club, which is located adjacent to the gym site.
Project Cost:
Actuals
Total Project
to Date
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Cost
Administration
$
23,283
$
26,717
$
25,000
$
75,000
$
150,000
Construction
$
250,000
$
2,000,000
$
2,250,000
Construction Engineering
$
25,000
$
73,000
$
98,000
Design
$
33,405
$
316,595
$
350,000
Fixtures/Fum/Equip
$
175,000
$
175,000
Totals
$
56,688
$
343,312
$
300,000
$
2,323,000 $ $
$
3,023,000
Source of Funds:
Boys & Girls Club Donation
$
401,000
$
401,000
CDBG
$
56,688
$
343,312
$
300,000
$
1,710,000
$
2,410,000
Reimbursements/Other*
$
50,000
$
50,000
EDI
$
162,000
$
162,000
Total Funding:
$
56,688
$
343,312
$
300,000
$
2,323,000 $ $
$
3,023,000
Future O & M Cost:
$
5,000
Annually
*County Supervisor 3rd District Discretionary Funding
Advance of CDBG Funds will be requested in FY 2011-12 to complete the project
105
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
Item No. 13
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: Gail Zigler, Administrative Assistant
The Redhawk Park Improvement project Phase 1 bid opening was held and a contractwas awarded
at the October 27, 2009. Phase 1 construction has begun and will include construction of a
restroom, parking lot improvements, and a basketball court at Redhawk Community Park, as well as
a permanent dog park.
The Escallier House and Barn have been relocated as part of the Temecula Community Center
(TCC) expansion project. A bid opening was held on March 4, 2010. The project calls for
refurbishment of the Escallier House and Barn which will be the future home of the Temecula
Community Pantry. A construction contract will be awarded in April.
A conceptual design for the Old Town Gymnasium project is complete and a recommendation to
approve the design will move forward to Council in April.
A City -Wide Community Clean-up will be held on Saturday, April 10, 2010 at Chaparral High School
from 8:OOam to 2:OOpm. This event is for Temecula residents only and allows for the disposal of
bulky items, yard debris, household electronic devices, and more.
The Community Services Department is currently programming for spring and summer activities and
events. The Temecula Special Games to be held on March 13, 2010, the Annual Easter Egg Hunt
will be held on Saturday, April 3, 2010 at four park sites. In addition, staff is planning for the Spring
Community Services Expo, the Annual Summer Sunsets Film and Concert Series, the 4th of JUly
Parade and Fireworks Show and many more activities and events.
The Cultural Arts Division continues to program and carry -out the classes and activities as outlined
in the Guide to Leisure Activities, and the Old Town Temecula Community Theater's musical and
theatrical performance line-up. The Cultural Arts Division is responsible for the day-to-day
operations of the Old Town Temecula Community Theater, the Temecula Valley History Museum
and Pennypickle's Workshop, Temecula Children's Museum.
The Community Services Department continues to participate in the development review of projects
within the City, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the
contract for refuse and recycling, and assessment administration.
The TCSD Maintenance Division plays an integral role in assisting with the many citywide special
events held each month. In addition, the Maintenance Division has responded to numerous
maintenance situations arising out the inclement weather we have experienced during the past
month, as well as continuing to oversee the maintenance and rehabilitation of all City parks and
facilities.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
Item No. 14
ACTION MINUTES
of
MARCH 9, 2010
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
The Temecula Redevelopment Agency Meeting convened at 7:31 PM.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Mike Naggar
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Washington, Roberts,
Naggar
RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
RDA CONSENT CALENDAR
15 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Agency Member
Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero
and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve the action minutes of February 23, 2010.
16 Third Amendment to the Exclusive Neaotiatina Aareement with Pelican Properties LLC
for the lease and development of Agency owned property - Approved Staff
Recommendation (5-0-0) — Agency Member Washington made the motion; it was
seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and electronic vote reflected
unanimous approval
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Approve the Third Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement ("ENA")
between Pelican Properties LLC ("Pelican"), and the Temecula Redevelopment
Agency ("Agency").
RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
Executive Director Nelson invited the public to the attend the Temecula Spring Rod Run in Old
Town, Friday and Saturday, March 12 and 13, 2010, advising that the new Civic Center parking
structure will be open.
RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT
RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
RDA ADJOURNMENT
At 7:32 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, March 23, 2010, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing
at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Michael S. Naggar, Chair Person
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
RDA DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
Item No. 15
Approvals
City Attorney /10
Director of Finance
City Manager
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Executive Director/Agency Members
FROM: Patrick Richardson, Planning and Redevelopment Director
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Redevelopment Departmental Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
REDEVELOPMENT
Temecula Vallev Convention and Visitors Bureau Lease of Commercial Soace in the Old Town
Parking Garage - The Agency and the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau have
executed an Office Lease for commercial space in the Old Town Parking Garage. The
Convention and Visitor's Bureau is currently in the process of working with the architect of the
Civic Center project to design the tenant improvements.
Town Square Market Place - As part of the Civic Center Master Plan, the City has created a
development opportunity for approximately 52,000 square feet of commercial and office
development surrounding the Town Square along the reconfigured Main Street. The Agency
issued a Request for Interest to select a preferred development partner. On August 26, 2008,
the City Council entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Pelican Properties
to develop the project. Pelican has participated in several meetings with Old Town stakeholders
and adjacent property owners. They have worked closely with staff on site planning issues. On
January 22, 2009 the Executive Director granted a three-month extension to the Exclusive
Negotiating Agreement which expires on May 26, 2009. Due to the state of the economy staff
recommends the Agency extend the ENA an additional six months. On May 26, 2009 Agency
Board approved a six (6) month extension to the ENA. Recently the Agency staff and Pelican
Properties representatives met and agreed that it is necessary to discuss the possibility of an
additional extension. Agency staff met with the Agency sub -committee in February and
received direction to take an extension of one year with the possibility of an additional one year
administrative extension which the Agency approved on March 9, 2010.
Auto Mall Sign - The Agency and Auto Dealers Association have entered into a Loan
Agreement for a loan from the Agency to the Auto Dealers Association in the amount of
$875,000 for a state of the art high definition marquee sign. Part of the agreement stipulates
that the City will have 10 percent of the time between sunrise and 11:00 p.m. daily to use the
sign to promote City interests. The sign will be located on the currently vacant parcel south of
Rancho Ford. The old sign will be removed. Per the Loan Agreement the Auto Mall sign shall
be constructed on or before October 13, 2010. The Auto Dealers Association anticipates
construction of the sign to begin late February.
Facade Improvement Program - The Fagade Improvement Program provides funding
assistance to Old Town business and property owners to provide exterior improvements to their
buildings and property. Funding in the amount of $80,000 is available during FY 2009-2010
The following Fagade improvements are in process or recently completed:
• Emporium Center — Fagade Renovation
• Temecula Stage Stop — Outdoor canopy renovation
• Pennypickle's Workshop — Change copy and refurbish sign
• The applications currently under review have exhausted the Fagade Improvement
Program budget for this Fiscal Year. Staff will advise all subsequent applicants that
funds are not available for the remainder of this Fiscal Year.
Currently the program is temporarily frozen due to the State of California Redevelopment
Budget take. The Agency hopes to reinstate the program in the Spring of 2010.
AB 4X 26 — State of California Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund Shift for
Fiscal Year 2009-2010 - On July 28, 2009 the Governor signed AB 4X 26 to address the fiscal
emergency declared by the Governor on July 1, 2009. This bill amends the Health and Safety
code to require a $1.7 billion SERAF shift from redevelopment agencies for Fiscal Year 2009-
2010 and a $350 million SERAF shift for Fiscal Year 2010-2011. Per this legislation, the
California State Department of Finance has notified the Agency that its payment obligation for
Fiscal Year 2009-2010 SERAF shift is ($4,354,450.00).
The City is required to notify the County Audit -Controller of its intent to fund it SERAF payment
by March 1, 2010. The Agency is required to make findings via resolution of insufficient other
moneys in order to be able to utilize housing set-aside funds. The Agency intends to make its
SERAF payments with housing set-aside funds. The notification of the County Auditor -
Controller was approved February 9, 2010. Concurrently, the issue of utilizing housing set-
aside funds in order to make the SERAF payment was also approved by the Agency Board at
its February 9, 2010 meeting.
HOUSING
2010 Tax Allocation Bond - On December 8, 2009, the Redevelopment Agency adopted a
Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
Designating Consultants in Connection With the Proposed Issuance of Tax Allocation Housing
Bonds and Authorizing and Directing Certain Actions With Respect Thereto," expressing the
intent of the Agency to issue tax allocation housing bonds to finance housing activities of the
Redevelopment Agency, and designating various professionals, including a financial advisor, a
fiscal consultant, bond counsel, disclosure counsel and a bond underwriter, to assist the
Redevelopment Agency in connection with the issuance of the bonds.
The Redevelopment Agency Staff and consultants have been working to prepare the necessary
documents to issue the bonds, including an indenture of trust which provides for the terms of the
proposed bonds, a preliminary official statement which describes the bond issue and is to be
used to market the bonds to prospective investors, a bond purchase agreement pursuant to
which the bonds would be sold, and a continuing disclosure certificate regarding ongoing
disclosure of the Agency over the term of the bonds. It is proposed that the proceeds of the
bonds be used to finance housing activities of the Redevelopment Agency within or of benefit to
the Temecula Redevelopment Project No. 1. The primary activities anticipated to be financed
with proceeds of the bonds include (i) funding the Redevelopment Agency's $6,000,000
contribution to the Warehouse at Creekside development which was approved by Resolution
RDA No. 08-06 by the Redevelopment Agency Board and City Council Resolution No. 08-81 on
August 12, 2008, and (ii) using approximately $6,000,000 of bond proceeds to assist in the
development of a mixed income affordable housing project on Redevelopment Agency -owned
property (and adjacent parcels) on Pujol Street adjacent to the Main Street Apartments. Bond
proceeds may also be used for other housing activities of the Redevelopment Agency.
The TAB Housing bonds were approved for sales by the Agency board at the February 9, 2010
meeting. Subsequently the Bonds were successfully sold and are scheduled to close escrow in
early March.
R.C. Hobbs Exclusive Negotiating Agreement - Hobbs recently approached the Agency
regarding the possible development of mixed income affordable housing on vacant Agency
owned property located at 28640 Pujol Street. Considering Hobbs' background and recent Staff
experience working with the organization staff felt that Hobbs would be a quality partner on an
affordable housing development at the aforementioned location. Hobbs requested that the
Agency and Hobbs enter into an ENA with a one-year term with a potential six month extension
by written approval of the Executive Director. The Agency considered and approved the ENA at
its February 9, 2010 meeting.
The Warehouse at Creekside - On August 12, 2008, the City Council approved an Owner
Participation Agreement with Warehouse at Creekside for an Affordable Housing Mixed Use
Project. The Agency is currently working with Bill Dalton on a new development on 3'' Street in
Old Town. The proposed development includes 32 units of affordable housing and a 3500
square foot ground floor of commercial. The project includes one dedicated parking space for
each residential unit. Grading permits have been issued for the project. The project is currently
under construction and is slated to be completed by spring 2010. In conjunction with the
proposed Housing Tax Increment Bond sale anticipated to close (if approved) in late February,
the Agency and Developer have tentatively agreed to minor language modifications of the
Owner Participation Agreement. The Language modifications are evidenced in a draft Second
Amendment to the Owner Participation Agreement approved by the Agency Board at its
February 9, 2010 meeting.
Diaz Road Exclusive Negotiation Agreement - The Agency issued a Request for Interest to
select a preferred development partner for the 30 -acre site located on Diaz Road. Seven firms
have responded. On September 9, 2008, the City Council entered into an Exclusive Negotiating
Agreement with RC Hobbs Company to develop the project. Due to the State of California's
Redevelopment SERAF take it is not possible for the Agency to pursue a project with the Hobbs
Company on the Diaz site at this time. The Agency negotiated a Purchase and Sale Agreement
and Escrow Instructions ("PSA") for the sale of approximately 20 acres to Clearwater
Development for the development of a water park. The Agency Board approved the PSA on
September 22, 2009. Major terms of the PSA are a purchase price of $6.7 million with a $1
million "holdback" to mitigate existing soils conditions. Since the Agency and Clearwater
Development entered into the PSA Clearwater requested an extension to the escrow of 6
months. At the October 27, 2009 Agency Board meeting the extension was approved. The new
close of escrow is scheduled for April 30, 2010.
First Time Homebuyers Program - On July 22, 2008, the City Council approved an amendment
to increase the loan amount for down payment assistance from $24,000 to $65,000. This down
payment assistance allows qualifying households to purchase homes in the $250,000-$300,000
price range. An article published in the Californian on July 5, 2009 has generated tremendous
interest in the program. However, on July 24, 2009, the State Legislature passed a budget that
proposes a take of $2.05 Billion in statewide redevelopment agency funds to help close the
State's current budget deficit. This means that about $4,300,000 in City of Temecula
Redevelopment Agency funds could be diverted to the state this Fiscal Year and an additional
$900,000 diverted to the state in Fiscal Year 2010/2011. As a result, funding for this program is
temporarily frozen and no new applications are being considered at this time.
Summerhouse - The Agency negotiated an Owner Participation Agreement ("OPK) with
Summerhouse Housing Partners L.P for the purchase and development of the Summerhouse
community. The Agency Board approved the OPA on September 22, 2009. The OPA terms
require the development of 70 affordable units at very -low income, 20 units at moderate income,
and 20 units at senior affordable income. The terms of this agreement place affordability
restrictions on the property for 55 years.
Summerhouse Housing Partners L.P. has closed escrow and taken full title to the property and
has begun the clean-up and restoration of the site. A development plan has been submitted to
the City and completion of the partially completed units shall begin within 120 days with
completion of those 20 units no more than 15 months thereafter.
Residential Improvement Program - The program budget for FY 2009/2010 is $200,000.00.
However, on July 24, 2009, the proposed State budget take of about $4,300,000 from the City
of Temecula Redevelopment Agency has required unreserved funds budgeted for this program
to be temporarily frozen. The Redevelopment Agency is currently processing five applications
totaling $34,295 that were in the queue prior to Monday, July 27. No new applications are being
considered at this time. Eleven applications are on hold pending release of funds for this
program.
PUBLIC HEARING
Item No. 16
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Richards, Director of Planning and Redevelopment
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending portions of Title
17 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Long Range Planning Project No. LR09-0001)
PREPARED BY: Betsy Lowrey, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
Introduce and read by title only an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 10 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE FAMILY DAYCARE
REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW,
UPDATE PUBLIC NOTICING REQUIREMENTS, REQUIRE A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN WINE TASTING
ESTABLISHMENTS, MODIFY SIGN PROGRAM REGULATIONS,
CLARIFY GOVERNMENTAL EXEMPT SIGNS, STREAMLINE
EXTENSION OF TIME APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS, REMOVE
THE TERM "GRANNY FLAT," REVISE GUEST HOUSE
REQUIREMENTS AND MAKE OTHER MINOR CLARIFICATIONS
OR TYPOGRAPHICAL CORRECTIONS (LONG RANGE
PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR09-0001)
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: The proposed ordinance is an update to several sections of
Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Development Code) to provide clarifications and make
revisions as follows: (1) Large Family Daycares (8-14 children maximum) shall be consistent with
State Law and require a State License. In addition, a Notice of Intent to approve a Large Family
Daycare shall be sent to neighbors within 100 feet and no public is required unless requested.
Further, large family daycares shall comply with the City's noise regulations, provide a 500 foot
separation between other large family daycares, and provide pick-up and drop-off parking spaces;
(2) All onsite public notice postings shall be consistent with State law requirements of one 4'x4' sign
per improved street frontage or two 4'x4' signs per street frontage for sites larger than five acres,
except in cases where the Director of Planning may require supplemental and/or larger signs for
projects that may change or intensifythe existing use or zoning; (3) Pursuant to State law, the term
"Granny Flats" is obsolete and shall be removed from the Development Code and the existing
provisions for second dwelling units apply; (4) Guest Houses may be allowed up to 1,200 square
feet if bathroom facilities are installed for guest houses larger than 800 square feet; (5) The
requirements mandating a shopping or business center to submit a sign program are revised to
apply only to historic structures, developments greater than 100,000 square feet, or buildings or
sites with unique characteristics infeasible of applying standard signage requirements; (6) Clarify
that governmental directional signs including public colleges/university directional signs are
consistent with other civic directional signs located within the City and standards are provided for its
location in the right of way areas of the City; (7) Clarify that a conditional use permit for wine tasting
shops is only required within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Zone or if the alcohol license
proposed is other than Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 02; and that wine tasting
shops are otherwise permitted outright within the Community Commercial (CC), Highway Tourist
(HT) and Service Commercial (SC); and, (8) Allow for extensions of time applications to be
administratively approved if there are no major changes; however the Planning Director reserves the
right to refer any matters to the Planning Commission for consideration.
BACKGROUND: Since adoption of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the City Council
periodically amends its Development Code to improve its clarity, make corrections consistent with
State Law, and/or add, simplify or clarify regulations. These cyclical updates ensure the
Development Code is current and up-to-date. This proposal was presented to the Planning
Commission on February 3, 2010. The Planning Commission recommended approval, with a few
minor adjustments which have been incorporated into the proposed Ordinance. An overview for
each topic is provided below and includes all Planning Commission recommendations.
Family Daycare Permits
Currently, the City's Development Code requires a public hearing for the approval of a large family
day care which could allow up to 14 children subject to certain age restrictions (small family day
cares allow up to eight children). Since State law directs that large family day cares be
administratively approved, the proposed Development Code amendment eliminates the public
hearing requirement for a large family day care. A notice of administrative approval (or denial) of a
large family day care home, however, shall be mailed to all property owners within 100 feet of the
proposed large family day care home ten days prior to the effective date of the decision and any
affected party may then request that the matter be presented at a public hearing for approval. In
addition, approval of a large family day care must meet certain standards set by the State which
have been incorporated into the Ordinance including the following: (1) a minimum distance of 500
feet to the nearest large family day care home; and, (2) compliance with all applicable City noise
regulations; and (3) one off-street parking space shall be provided for each nonresident employee
(in addition to required residential parking) and two driveway spaces for pick-up and drop-off of
children. All family day cares require a State license to operate in compliance with all applicable
State and local health and safety requirements and regulations. The proposed amendment to the
City's Development Code regulates family day cares to the extent allowable by State law.
Public Noticing
The City of Temecula posts 4'x4' freestanding signs at sites where projects are proposed for
hearing. For properties less than five acres in size, one sign per improved street frontage is posted
on site. For properties greater than five acres in size, two signs per improved street frontage are
posted on site. This posting is required by State law and the City of Temecula is not mandated by
State law or CEQA to post any other larger or supplemental signs. It is staff's recommendation that
posting consistent with State law as described herein provides adequate signage. Automatically
mandating larger or supplemental signs for projects will be repealed by this Amendment; however,
the caveat remains that the Director of Planning may require larger or supplemental signs for
projects that require special attention such as in cases where the land use may intensify over its
existing zoning or other instances as deemed appropriate by the City. In addition, the proposed
Amendment removes redundancy in the required language for posted, published or mailed notices
of public hearings and makes minor clarifications consistent with State law. A redlined proposal is
attached as Exhibit "A".
Granny Flats
Pursuant to State law, "Granny Flats" is an obsolete term. When adding a secondary living quarter
to a private residence, the City's standards for "secondary dwelling units" are set forth within the
City's Development Code to adequately reflect State law requirements for second dwellings and
shall apply. Therefore, staff recommends all references to "granny flats" be deleted.
Guest Houses
Currently, guest houses on residential lots are restricted to 800 square feet, whereas secondary
dwelling units are allowed to be 1,200 square feet. The primary difference between a "guest house"
and a "secondary dwelling unit" is secondary dwelling units are independent living quarters and
therefore have cooking and bathroom facilities so as to function independently whereas guest
houses do not. Property owners that would like a guest house are constrained to 800 square feet
unless they revise their plans to install a bathroom and cooking facilities to qualify as a "secondary
dwelling unit" with independent living quarters, even if they do not want such facilities. Staff
recommends that it would be appropriate to allow a guest house to be 1,200 square feet, which is
the same size limit as a secondary dwelling unit.
Planning Commission Comments: The Planning Commission expressed concerns that a property
owner with a guest house over 800 square feet (with no kitchen or bath facility) might actually use
the guest house as a secondary unit providing unsafe conditions for tenants without cooking or
bathing facilities and therefore recommended that a bathroom be mandated for guest houses larger
800 square feet. Staff has incorporated this provision within the Ordinance and further defined that
guest houses shall not be used as secondary living quarters. A redlined proposal is attached as
Exhibit "B".
Sign Programs
To date, the Planning Department has approved 121 sign programs for various existing and new
retail/office centers throughout the City, including the majority of the larger commercial
developments. As intended all of these sign programs are protected in place and serve as the
guideline for each new sign approval within these 121 centers. While comprehensive sign programs
are beneficial to ensure overall cohesiveness of larger projects, staff has determined that the
existing Development Code design standards (regulating size, material, illumination, compatibility
with surroundings, etc.) are adequate for smaller developments without requiring a sign program.
Staff recommends that future comprehensive sign programs be preserved for developments larger
than 100,000 square feet, historical buildings, or in cases where the unique characteristics of the
architecture or site cannot accommodate standard signage. Streamlining sign program
requirements will eliminate expenses for smaller property owners and businesses, but still achieve
the high level of design review as prescribed by the sign standards (with minor changes proposed to
clarify and enhance the sign criteria) within the City's Development Code. Staff's proposal to modify
the sign design criteria and sign program requirements is redlined on Exhibit "C" attached.
Directional Signs
The City's Development Code currently allows any official government sign, public notice or a
warning required by an applicable Federal, State or local law, regulation or ordinance to be exempt
from the commercial sign regulations within the Development Code. It is the City's policy that such
governmental signs include directional signs in the right-of-way that benefit the general public to
help find public facilities, including public colleges and universities as well as other public
organizations or offices. This Development Code Amendment codifies this policy and provides
standards for public universities and colleges directional signs to ensure that they are consistent
with the other civic directional signs located within the City. A redlined proposal is attached as
Exhibit "D".
Wine Tastin
A "Wine Tasting Shop (including product sale for off-site consumption)" is a permitted use within
certain zones within the City. Staff recommends that clarification be provided so that it is clearto all
applicants this provision is intended for Wine Tasting Shops consistent with the Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control License Type 02 which allows for wine tasting for wine growers. Any
Wine Tasting Shop that exceeds a Type 02 License Type would require a City -approved Conditional
Use Permit. A redlined proposal is attached as Exhibit "E."
Extension of Time
Currently projects approved by a hearing body are required to return to the hearing body for each
Extension of Time, even if there are no changes to the proposal. Staff recommends streamlining
the process to allow extension of time requests be approved by the Director of Planning so long as
there are no major modifications to the project proposal. As already specified within the Code,
major modifications to projects which were approved by the Planning Commission or City Council
would still need to be considered by the original approval body. Also, at any time the Director of
Planning reserves the right to require any Extension of Time to return to the approval board if
needed.
Planning Commission Comments: Commission recommended that an notice of intent to approve
any Extension of Time application for a project previously approved at a public hearing be posted at
the site and mailed out in order to notify surrounding properties owners of the extension of time
application approval and thatthe Director of Planning refer items of special significance or impactto
the Planning Commission for consideration. These recommendations have been incorporated into
the proposal and a redlined copy is attached as Exhibit "F".
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Redlined exhibits
Ordinance
EXHIBIT A
17.03.040 Public hearing and notification.
A. Setting Public Hearing. A public hearing for an application shall be in
accordance with the California Government Code. The hearing date will be set before
the City Council, Planning Commission, Planning Director, or other appropriate hearing
body only when the following have occurred:
1. The Pplanning Ddepartment has determined that the application is
complete.
2. All required procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and Temecula guidelines for the implementation of CEQA have been met.
B. Notice of Hearing for Review of Applications. Not less than ten 10
calendar days prior to the date of a public hearing, the Cgity Cslerk shall give notice
^^',o 1d:n9 hethat shall include the following information concerning the public hearing
time, place, identity of the approval body, nature of the application, and -the -general
explanation of the matter to be considered and a general description (in text or by
diagram) of the location of the real property ., if any, that is the
subject of the hearing. The appreval-bedyCity Clerk shall ebservedistribute the notisiR
requirement set feFth notice as follows:
1. A copy of the notice shall be published at least once in at least one local
newspaper of general circulation in the city: provided however, that if there is no
newspaper of general circulation in the city, the notice shall be posted in at least
three publislypublically accessible locations in the city ld by state la
and the FRURiGipal Gode.
2. The notice shall be mailed first class and postage pre -paid to the applicant
and its representative,, (as shown on the application); to the property owner
shown on the latest available equalized assessment roll of the County of
Riverside or the owner's agent; to all persons whose names and addresses
appear on the latest available assessment roll of the county of Riverside as
owners of property within a distance of six hundred 600 feet from the exterior
boundaries of the site for which the application is filed (a minimum of thirty
property owners); to anyone filing a written request for notification; and to such
other persons whose property might, in the planning GOMMOSIS.'On'sPlanning
Director's judgment, be affected by the establishment of the use or zone
requested.
3• All posted er mailed nnfinps of Notices shall be sent to public hearings to
be senducted_departments, bureaus, or agencies which are determined by the
planniRg planRiRg Planning Director to be affected by the
application or sit�seunsilotherwise reouiring notice.
4. Whenever the Temecula City Council Planning Commission Planninq
Director, or any -other appropriate hearing body ef the Git -"-I' t
following considers the adoption or amendment of policies or ordinances
affecting drive-through facilities the City Clerk shall incorporate where
necessary, notice procedures to the blind aped and disabled communities in
order to facilitate their participation.
5 Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Tf-. cic City Council,
{Planning Commission, Planning Director, or other body--as--appropriate]-is
hearing body shall be filed within time required by, and shall be controlled by4he
statute of�o t forth ' , Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the
California Code of Civil Procedure. Any-asiian All posted, published or
preseedingmailed notices of public hearings to attack, review, set aside, er void
any desisien- of be conducted by the TemeGUIa City Council—{,_Planning
Commission, Planning Director, or other appropriate hearing body as
apprepr atej ;s, shall contain the following:
"Any petition for iudicial review of a decision of the City Council. rPlannin
Commission. Planning Director, or other appropriate hearing bodyl shall
be filed within time required by, and controlled by Chapter -2-.36 Sections
1094.5 and 1094.6 of the TemeGLIG IVIURiGipai�Caliifornia Code-. of Civil
Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of,
which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Temecula
City Council [Planning Commission, Planning Director, or other body --as
appropriate hearing bodvl shall be limited to those issues raised at the
hearing as provided iR Chapter 2.36 of the TemeoulaIVIUR'Gipal Ge
Gity k.
4. All published ROt'Ges of publIG hearings to be GonduGted by the Gity GGURGil
planning commission, planning direGtOF, or other apprepriate bedy shall Gentain
the #eAewing:
If YOU Wish tO Ghallenge the above *R GeuFt, the GhalleRge will be limited to GRIY
these you or - else raised at the publiG hearing or
Wio
• _ .•.
6. All noticing requirements required by the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and the cCity guidelines for the implementation of CEQA shall be
followed.
C. Posting of Property.
1. Standard Notice. The property, which is the subject of the proposed
development, shall be posted with informational signs that are four ,{Meet by
fours feet in size, and shall include a description of the proposed
development, the date, time, and location of the public hearing, and the location
where further information can be obtained. For properties less than five (5)
acres in size, one aLsign per improved street frontage shall be posted on site.
For properties greater than five nacres in size, twos signs per improved
street frontage shall be posted on site. For properties that are unusually shaped
or within a unique location, the direGtGF Of planningPlanning Director may
determine the location for sign posting or require additional noticing of the
proposed project. For proiects that may change or intensify the existing use or
zoning, the Planning Director may require supplemental_ or larqer signs or both.
NO
NOTICE OF FILING
w. W: fact 19876 T
!PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 127
Appoc•nl: rume 1N•An0
TevAce Delopers Q
rwweuw pImmm ommm
ort" flop !&4400
VINE
Up—
will
D. Continuances._ If, for any reason, testimony on a case cannot be heard or
completed at the time set for such hearing, the chair of the hearing body may continue
or extend the hearing to another time. Before adjournment or recess, the chair shall
publicly announce the time and place at which the hearing will be continued. If the
hearing is continued to a specific time and place, no further notice shall be required.
E. Notice of Decision. The City Council. Planning
Commission, Planning Director, or d'reGter of plaRRhIgOther appropriate hearing bodv
shall hear relevant testimony from interested persons and shall make its decision within
fifteen days after the close of the public hearing._ Notice of the decision shall be filed by
the diresier-of planningPlanning Director with the sits- slerkCity Clerk, together with a
report of the proceedings, not more than fifteen days after the decision. _A copy of the
notice of decision shall be mailed tofirst class and postage pre -paid to both the applicant
and to its representative (as shown on the application) and to any person who has
made a written request for a copy of the decision.
F. Withdrawal of an Application. Any application may be withdrawn at any
time prior to a public hearing by filing with the approving body a written request for
withdrawal. The request for withdrawal shall be signed by all persons who signed the
original application or their designated agents or current fee owner. Any such
application or petition may be withdrawn after commencement of a public hearing
thereon, with approval of the hearing body. At the time of the withdrawal of the
application, consideration may be given for refunding of application fees in whole or in
part, based upon the time expended by the eityCity staff up to the time of withdrawal of
the application._ Refunding policies shall be established by the city-ceunsitCity Council.
EXHIBIT B
17.34.10 Definitions and Illustrations of terms.
"Guest House" means an additional structure unit -to a primary residence on a parcel zoned for single-
family residentialee, attached or detached, utilized
PUFPesesras an incidental use to the primary residence but shall not be utilized as self contained
living quarters or a secondary dwelling unit (see Secondary Dwelling Unit) and shall does -not contain
cooking facilities which require outside venting per the Uniform Building Code. A guest house shall -and
dnw; not exceed twelve eigHt-hundred square feet in area and shall contain a bathroom with a toilet.
sink, and a bathtub and/or shower if it is over eight hundred square feet
"Secondary dwelling unit" means an additional complete dwelling unit on a lot with an existing single-
family residence that provides independent living facilities for one or more persons.
EXHIBIT C
17.28.080 Sign programs.
A. Sign Program Required. In addition to the sign permits required by this Chapter, certain types of signs and
developments require a sign program to ensure that all proposed signs are in harmony with other on-site
signs buildings and surrounding developments For existing developments without sign programs the
purpose of this provision is to bring centers or buildings without sign programs into conformance with the
development code while allowing existing legal signage to remain until new signage is proposed
1. New Sion Program. For new developments land for approved or existing developments that
propose a major modification or propose to replace or construct a new permanent freestanding or
wall mounted sion) a new sign program is required only if any of the following circumstances
exist:
a. Whenever a shopping center, neighborhood commercial center, office center, building or
development is greater than 100,000 square feet in total building area and has more than a
total of four permanent signs counting wall mounted and free standing signs:
b. Whenever the development contains a historic structure: or
C Whenever a proposed permanent sign exceeds or cannot comply with the standards
required by this Chapter due to unique characteristics of the site or building facade upon
which the sign is placed.
2. Existing Sign Program All approved sign programs for existing or approved developments shall
remain in full force and effect. Any revision to an approved sign program shall require a
modification planning application.
B. Findings. The following findings must be made by the approval body prior to approving a sign program:
1. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to:
a. All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by incorporating
several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign
type or sign shape,
b. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors or design
motifs included in the building being identified, and
C. Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring
adjacent approved signs;
2. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in
building tenants; and
3. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this chapter, in that the sign program complies
with all the regulations of this chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area,
number, location and height. Further, to the extent the sign program does not comply with the
requirements of this chapter as to sign area, number, location and height, the proposed sign
program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of this chapter.
17.28.070.13 General requirements for permanent signs.
3. Area.
b. Wall signs shall not cover more than one square foot of sign area per linear foot of the
architectural facade upon which the sign is located (and no more than seventy-five percent of the
surface of the building face that the sign is located on excluding window and door areasl.-This
provision shall net apply to pFimaFy Maximum area of sign shall also not exceed one
square foot of sion area per linear foot of business frontage
C. Wall signs shall not extend more than seventy-five percent of the suite length for
multitenant buildings or building frontage for single tenant buildings. This pFevision shall not apply t
primaFy tenant signs.
6. Illumination.
b. External illumination is not permitted unless approved through a sign pFegFarngp_pgrt of a
Planning application (sign program minor modification major modification or development plan as
applicable).
17.28.240 Requirements for wall mounted business or building identification signs for buildings with
two stories or less in commercial districts.
Wail mounted business identification signs are intended to provide identification for the individual
businesses located in buildings with two stories or less in commercial districts.
A. Maximum number of signs shall be one per frontage for each tenant.
B. Maximum area of signs shall be one squaFe feet ef sign aFea f19F eaGh sign peF lipeal feet of
building fFentage not exceed one souare foot of sign area per linear foot of the architectural fagade
upon which the sign is located (and shall not cover more than seventy-five percent of the surface of
the building face that the sign is located on excluding window and door areas) Maximum area of
sign shall also not exceed one square foot of sign area per linear foot of business frontage
C. Building identification signs are only permitted if no tenant identification signs are placed on
the building.
17.28.325 Freeway oriented signs in professional office district.
Only travel oriented commercial uses such as gas stations, restaurants, fast food establishments and hotels/motels
with freeway frontage are permitted, thFaugh appFeval ef a sign PFegramq-tepermitted to have freeway oriented
signs. Freeway oriented signs are permitted as freestanding and wall mounted signs. Freestanding signs may
identify centers, multiple tenants, and/or single tenants. The provisions included in Section 17.28.210 shall apply to
all signs permitted by this subsection.
EXHIBIT D
17.28.050 Exempt signs. —
----- - -----------
The following signs are exempt from the requirement to obtain a sign permit pursuant to this chapter if
they meet these specified requirements; however, they may require building permits:
F. Government Signs. Any official government sign_ including a governmental directional
sign or a public notice or warning required by an applicable federal, state or local law, regulation
or ordinance.
1. Offsite directional signs for Public college or Public universities
a. General Requirements.
iii. Maximum height of the Pole shall be ten feet
iv. The edge of the bottom of the sign shall not be lower than seven
feet above ground level.
V. Maximum sign area for each sign shall be six square feet
b. Findings.
EXHIBIT E
17.08.030 Use regulations.
The land uses list in the following Table 17.08.030 shall be permitted in one or more of the
commercial zoning districts as indicated in the columns corresponding to each residential
district. Where indicated with a letter "P," the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated
with a "-," the use is prohibited within the zone. A letter "C" indicates the use shall be
conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit.
Table 17.08.030
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts
Description of Use NCI CC HT SC PO BP LI
A
Alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with
an otherwise allowable use (examples
include: bowling alleys and; golf courses -and
Wine tasting )l
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
W
Wine tasting shop with or without product
C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
sale for off-site consumption (Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control License Types
other than T e 02
Wine tasting shop (ixeluding, with or without
product sale for off-site consumption
(Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
C
P
P
P
License T e 02)
Notes:
1. Subject to the supplemental development standards contained in Chapter 17.10 of this code.
2. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
3. See Chapter 5.22 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
4. Senior housing residential projects in the CC, SC, HT and PO zones shall use the residential
performance and development standards for the high density residential zone. Senior housing
residential projects in the NC zone shall use the residential performance and development standards for
the medium density residential zone and the applicable supplemental development standards in
Chapter 17.10. Congregate care facilities shall use the residential performance standards.
5. New office buildings in the BP and LI zones are subject to performance standards contained in
Section 17.08.070(E).
6. Supplemental Design Review. Office buildings that are less than 50,000 square feet may be
approved, conditionally approved, or denied by the city council.
EXHIBIT F
17.05.020 Administrative approval of development plan.
H. Time Extension. The direeteF of planningPlanning Director may, upon an application being filed -Re
prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-
year extensions of time. Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year increments only. Upon
granting of an extension, the Planning Director diFester--of-planning-shall ensure that conditions of the
administrative approval complies with all current development code provisions.
1. For any time extension that administratively extends an approval that was originally
approved at a public hearing notice of the Planning Director's decision to administratively approve a
time extension shall be posted at the site and mailed at least ten days prior to its approval to the
applicant and its representative (as shown on the application); to the property owner (as shown on the
latest available equalized assessment roll of the County of Riverside) or the owner's agent; to all
Persons whose names and addresses appear on the latest available assessment roll of the county of
Riverside as owners of property within a distance of six hundred (600) feet from the exterior boundaries
of the site for which the application is filed (a minimum of thirty property owners); to anyone filing a
written request for notification: and to such other persons whose property might in the Planning
Director's iudgment, be affected by the establishment of the use or zone requested Notice shall also
be sent to public departments bureaus or agencies which are determined by the Planning Director to
be affected by the application.
2. For matters that are considered to have special significance or impact the Planning
Director may refer such items to the Planning Commission for consideration at a noticed public
hearing.
17.05.010 Development plans.
H.Time Extensions. The Planning Director approvingauthertty may, upon an application being filed
within�s-prior to the expiration, grant a time extension of one year (up to three extensions may
be granted). Upon granting the extension, the Planning Director approvingAx)dy shall ensure that the
development plan complies with all development code provisions.
oe attectea pv the application.
2. For matters that are considered to have special significance or impact the Planning
Director may refer such items to the Planning Commission for consideration at a noticed public
hearing."
17.04.010 Conditional use permits.
H. Time Extension. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the
conditional use permit, apply for up to three one-year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan.
Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year increments only.
An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Pplanning Ddirector, on forms provided by
the planning department and shall be filed with the pPlanning Ddepartment, accompanied by the
appropriate filing fee. Within thirty days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the
planning director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may
be granted by the pPlanning Ddirector only upon a determination that the property and use are
consistent with the general plan, land use ordinance, and all other city ordinances and regulations. For
any time extension that administratively extends an approval that was originally approved at a public
hearing, notice of the Planning Director's decision to administratively approve a time extension shall be
posted at the site and mailed at least ten days prior to its approval to the applicant and its
representative (as shown on the application): to the property owner (as shown on the latest available
equalized assessment roll of the County of Riverside) or the owner's agent: to all persons whose
names and addresses appear on the latest available assessment roll of the county of Riverside as
owners of property within a distance of six hundred (600) feet from the exterior boundaries of the site
for which the application is filed (a minimum of thirty property owners); to anyone filing a written request
for notification: and to such other persons whose property might in the Planning Director's judgment
be affected by the establishment of the use or zone requested Notice shall also be sent to public
departments, bureaus, or agencies which are determined by the Planning Director to be affected by the
application. For matters that are considered to have special significance or impact the Planning
Director may refer such items to the Planning Commission for consideration at a noticed public
hearing.
Any conditional use permit which is not used within the time specified in the grant of approval, or, if no
time is specified, within one year of the effective date of such approval, shall become subject to
termination. The Planning DirectorPlaRRiRg GGmmi6sion may extend such approval for a period not to
exceed one year. Provided an application requesting the extension is filed prior to the original
expiration date. For purposes of this section, "used" means the commencement of construction activity
or any activity authorized by the grant of approval or conditional approval.
17.03.090 Appeals.
A. Purpose of Appeals. The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a general
method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or dissatisfied with any action by an administrative
agency of the city in the administration or enforcement of any provision of this development code.
B. Decisions Which May Be Appealed to Planning Commission. The following actions
may be appealed to the planning commission:
1. Actions by the director of planning on approval of development permits, conditional
use permits and extensions of time;
2. Actions by the director of planning on the approval of sign permits.
C. Decisions Which May Be Appealed to the City Council. The following actions may be
appealed to the city council:
All decisions of the planning commission.
ORDINANCE NO. 10 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 17 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE FAMILY
DAYCARE REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
STATE LAW, UPDATE PUBLIC NOTICING
REQUIREMENTS, REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR CERTAIN WINE TASTING
ESTABLISHMENTS, MODIFY SIGN PROGRAM
REGULATIONS, CLARIFY GOVERNMENTAL EXEMPT
SIGNS, STREAMLINE EXTENSION OF TIME
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS, REMOVE THE TERM
"GRANNY FLAT," REVISE GUEST HOUSE
REQUIREMENTS AND MAKE OTHER MINOR
CLARIFICATIONS OR TYPOGRAPHICAL CORRECTIONS
(LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR09-0001)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. The proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code
was processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by the
California Environmental Quality Act.
B. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on February 3, 2010, to consider the proposed amendment at which time
the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in
support or opposition to the matter.
C. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearing and due consideration of the proposed amendment, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 10-04 recommending that the City Council
approve the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
D. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on the proposed amendment at which time all persons interested in the
proposed amendments had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these
matters, and following receipt of all public testimony closed the hearing.
Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed
Temecula Municipal Code amendments in Long Range Planning Project No. LR09-
0001, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040
("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code
are allowed in the land use designations in which the uses are located, as shown on the
land use map, or are described in the text of the General Plan.
B. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code
are in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of
the General Plan.
C. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code
are consistent with the General Plan and all applicable provisions contained therein.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. Pursuant to California Environmental
Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental
effects of the approval of the proposed Ordinance amending portions of Title 17 Of the
Temecula Municipal Code to revise family daycare requirements to be consistent with
State law, update public noticing requirements, require a Conditional Use Permit for
certain wine tasting establishments, modify sign program regulations, clarify
governmental exempt signs, streamline extension of time application requirements,
remove the term "granny flat," revise guest house requirements and make other minor
clarifications or typographical corrections Application, as described in the Initial Study
("the Project'). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined
that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on
the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared.
A. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as required by law. The public
comment period commenced on July 16, 2009, and expired on August 15, 2009.
Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the
offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California 92590.
B. No written comment(s) were received during the public comment period.
C. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration and any
comments received regarding the Negative Declaration prior to and at the February 17,
2010 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the
Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial
evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3)
Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning
Commission.
D. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning
Commission recommended on February 17, 2010 that the City Council adopt the
Negative Declaration prepared for this project.
Section 4. The row "Large family day care home facility" of Table 17.03.010
(Planning and Zoning Approval Authority) of Section 17.03.010 of Chapter 17.03
(Administration of Zoning) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is
hereby amended to delete footnote 1 in the row under "Large family day care home
facility" and relocate the "X" (for Approval Authority) to the column "Administrative
Approval' to read as follows:
Table 17.03.010
Planning and Zoning Approval Authority
Application
Administrative
Planning
Planning
City
Approval
Director
Commission
Council
Large family day care home
X
facility
Section 5. Section 17.04.050 (Large family day care permits) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Section 6. The row "Family day care homes — large" of Table 17.06.030
(Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.030 (Use regulations) of Chapter 17.06
(Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Family day care homes — large P P P P P P P P
Section 7. Note I" of Table 17.06.030 (Residential Districts) of Section
17.06.030 (Use regulations) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning)
of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
111. Subject to the provisions of Section 17.06.050(1) of this Chapter."
Section 8. Subsection I (Family Day Care Homes) of Section 17.06.050
(Special use standards and regulations) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title
17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
111. Family Day Care Homes.
1. Small family day care homes. Small family day care homes, as defined in
Chapter 3.4, Division 2 of the California Health and Safety Code, are permitted in
all residential zoning districts. Although no specific permit is required,
compliance with the performance standards contained in Section 17.06.050(1)(3)
is required.
2. Large family day care homes. Large family day care homes, as defined in
Chapter 3.4, Division 2 of the California Health and Safety Code, are permitted in
all single family zoning districts with the approval of a permit for a large family
day care home pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.06.050(1)(4).
Compliance with the performance standards contained in Sections
17.06.050(1)(3) is also required.
3. All family day care homes shall comply with the following requirements:
a. All family day care homes shall be state licensed and shall be
operated according to all applicable state and local health and safety
requirements and regulations; and
b. All family day care homes shall comply with all land use regulations
and site development standards of the zoning district in which they are
located.
4. In addition to the provisions of Section 17.06.050 (1)(3) above, large family
day care homes shall comply with the following requirements:
a. Standards. The Planning Director shall issue a use permit to a
large family day care home if the large family day care home meets the
following standards and requirements as prescribed by State law:
i. There shall be a minimum distance of five hundred feet
(500) between the exterior property line of the site on which the
large family day care home is located and the exterior property line
of the nearest large family day care home. The foregoing minimum
distance requirements shall not apply to small family day care
homes or school day care facilities.
ii. The operation of the large family day care home shall
comply with all applicable noise regulations of this Code or the
General Plan. The use of amplified music which can be heard from
a public right of way or neighboring property is prohibited during the
large family day care home's hours of operation.
iii. In addition to the parking otherwise required for a single-
family home, one off-street parking space shall be provided for
each nonresident employee, nonresident aide and any other
nonresident person engaged in the operation of the day care home.
The parking space may be in the third space of an extra wide
driveway or in the garage. At least two driveway spaces shall be
open for access and loading.
iv. At least one loading space, either in the driveway of the
home, or at the curb immediately in front of the home, must be
available for passenger loading and unloading, provided that the
use of the driveway will not block the public right-of-way and all
traffic laws are obeyed. Where street parking is available for
residential uses, that shall be sufficient for this purpose provided
that all traffic and parking regulations are obeyed and double
parking is prohibited.
b. Procedure. An application for a permit to operate a large family day
care home shall be filed with the Planning Director in a form provided by
the Director. Such application shall be completed and processed in
accordance with Section 17.03.030 and pursuant to the following
procedures as required by state law:
i. Notice. Notice of the Planning Director's decision to approve
or deny a large family day care home shall be shall be mailed, by
United States mail, postage prepaid, to the applicants and all
owners shown on the last equalized assessment roll as owning real
property within one hundred feet (100') of the exterior boundaries of
the proposed large family day care home ten at least (10) days
prior to the effective date of the decision.
ii. Hearing. No public hearing on the application shall be held
unless a hearing is requested in writing by the applicant or by an
affected party owning real property within one hundred feet (100')
of the exterior boundaries of the proposed large family day care
home. The hearing, if requested, shall be conducted by the
Planning Director.
iii. Appeal. The applicant or any interested party may appeal
the decision of the Planning Director to the Planning Commission.
The appellant shall pay the cost, if any, of the appeal."
Section 9. The term "family day care home" under Subsection F ("F"
Definitions and Illustrations) of Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"Family day care home" means a home which regularly provides care, protection,
and supervision of fourteen (14) or fewer children, in the provider's own home, for
periods of less than twenty-four (24) hours per day, while the parents or guardians are
away. This includes large and small family day care homes."
Section 10. The term "family day care home, small' under Subsection F ("F"
Definitions and Illustrations) of Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"Family day care home, small. "Small family day care home" means a home
which provides family day care to eight (8) or fewer children, including children under
the age of ten (10) years who reside in the home, as defined in Chapter 3.4, Division 2
of the California Health and Safety Code."
Section 11. The term "family day care home, large" under Subsection F ("F"
Definitions and Illustrations) of Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"Family day care home, large. "Large family day care home" means a home
which provides family day care to seven (7) to fourteen (14) children, including children
under the age of ten (10) years who reside in the home, as defined in Chapter 3.4,
Division 2 of the California Health and Safety Code."
Section 12. Section 17.03.040 (Public hearing and notification) of Chapter
17.03 (Administration of Zoning) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
17.03.040 Public hearing and notification.
A. Setting Public Hearing. A public hearing for an application shall be in
accordance with the California Government Code. The hearing date will be set before
the City Council, Planning Commission, Planning Director, or other appropriate hearing
body only when the following have occurred:
1. The Planning Department has determined that the application is
complete.
2. All required procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and Temecula guidelines for the implementation of CEQA have been met.
B. Notice of Hearing for Review of Applications. Not less than ten (10)
calendar days prior to the date of a public hearing, the City Clerk shall give notice that
shall include the following information concerning the public hearing: time, place,
identity of the approval body, nature of the application, general explanation of the matter
to be considered, and a general description (in text or by diagram) of the location of the
real property, if any, that is the subject of the hearing. The City Clerk shall distribute the
notice as follows:
1. A copy of the notice shall be published at least once in at least one
local newspaper of general circulation in the city; provided, however, that if there is no
newspaper of general circulation in the city, the notice shall be posted in at least three
publically accessible locations in the city.
2. The notice shall be mailed first class and postage pre -paid to the
applicant and its representative (as shown on the application); to the property owner (as
shown on the latest available equalized assessment roll of the County of Riverside) or
the owner's agent; to all persons whose names and addresses appear on the latest
available assessment roll of the county of Riverside as owners of property within a
distance of six hundred (600) feet from the exterior boundaries of the site for which the
application is filed (a minimum of thirty property owners); to anyone filing a written
request for notification; and to such other persons whose property might, in the Planning
Director's judgment, be affected by the establishment of the use or zone requested.
3. Notices shall be sent to public departments, bureaus, or agencies
which are determined by the Planning Director to be affected by the application or
otherwise requiring notice.
4. Whenever the Temecula City Council, Planning Commission,
Planning Director, or other appropriate hearing body considers the adoption or
amendment of policies or ordinances affecting drive-through facilities, the City Clerk
shall incorporate, where necessary, notice procedures to the blind, aged, and disabled
communities in order to facilitate their participation.
5. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council,
Planning Commission, Planning Director, or other appropriate hearing body shall be
filed within time required by, and shall be controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of
the California Code of Civil Procedure. All posted, published or mailed notices of public
hearings to be conducted by the City Council, Planning Commission, Planning Director,
or other appropriate hearing body, shall contain the following:
"Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council, [Planning
Commission, Planning Director, or other appropriate hearing body] shall be filed within
time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code
of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which
attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Temecula City Council
[Planning Commission, Planning Director, or other appropriate hearing body] shall be
limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to
the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice."
6. All noticing requirements required by the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the City guidelines for the implementation of CEQA shall be
followed.
C. Posting of Property.
1. Standard Notice. The property, which is the subject of the
proposed development, shall be posted with informational signs that are four (4) feet by
four (4) feet in size, and shall include a description of the proposed development, the
date, time, and location of the public hearing, and the location where further information
can be obtained. For properties less than five (5) acres in size, one (1) sign per
improved street frontage shall be posted on site. For properties greater than five (5)
acres in size, two (2) signs per improved street frontage shall be posted on site. For
properties that are unusually shaped or within a unique location, the Planning Director
may determine the location for sign posting or require additional noticing of the
proposed project. For projects that may change or intensify the existing use or zoning,
the Planning Director may require supplemental or larger signs or both.
D. Continuances. If, for any reason, testimony on a case cannot be heard or
completed at the time set for such hearing, the chair of the hearing body may continue
or extend the hearing to another time. Before adjournment or recess, the chair shall
publicly announce the time and place at which the hearing will be continued. If the
hearing is continued to a specific time and place, no further notice shall be required.
E. Notice of Decision. The City Council, Planning Commission, Planning
Director, or other appropriate hearing body shall hear relevant testimony from interested
persons and shall make its decision within fifteen days after the close of the public
hearing. Notice of the decision shall be filed by the Planning Director with the City
Clerk, together with a report of the proceedings, not more than fifteen days after the
decision. A copy of the notice of decision shall be mailed first class and postage pre-
paid to both the applicant and to its representative (as shown on the application) and to
any person who has made a written request for a copy of the decision.
F. Withdrawal of an Application. Any application may be withdrawn at any
time prior to a public hearing by filing with the approving body a written request for
withdrawal. The request for withdrawal shall be signed by all persons who signed the
original application or their designated agents or current fee owner. Any such
application or petition may be withdrawn after commencement of a public hearing
thereon, with approval of the hearing body. At the time of the withdrawal of the
application, consideration may be given for refunding of application fees in whole or in
part, based upon the time expended by the City staff up to the time of withdrawal of the
application. Refunding policies shall be established by the City Council."
Section 13. Subsection 17.03.090.B.1 of Subsection 17.03.090.13 (Decisions
Which May Be Appealed to Planning Commission) of Section 17.03.090 (Appeals) of
Chapter 17.03 (Administration of Zoning) of Title 17 (Zoning) is hereby amended to read
as follows:
111. Actions by the director of planning on approval of development permits,
conditional use permits and extensions of time."
Section 14. The entire row "Granny flat' of Table 17.06.030 (Residential
Districts) of Section 17.06.030 (Use regulations) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts)
of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby deleted.
Section 15. The entire row "Granny flat' of Table 17.24.040 (Parking Spaces
Required) of Section 17.24.040 (Parking Requirements) of Chapter 17.24 (Off Street
Parking and Loading) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
deleted.
Section 16. The Table 17.06.050A (Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR,
RR, VL, L-1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts) of Section 17.06.050 (Special use
standards and regulations) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning)
of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby modified to delete the words "granny flat or"
within the column Accessory Structure.
Section 17. The entire row "Granny flat' of Table 17.22.116 (Schedule of
Permitted Uses Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay District -2) of Section
17.22.116 (Use regulations) of Article III (Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay
District -2) of Chapter 17.22 (Planned Development Overlay Districts) of Title 17
(Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby deleted.
Section 18. The term and definition for "Granny flat housing" within Section
17.34.010.G (Definitions and illustrations of terms) of Chapter 17.34 (Definition of terms)
of Title 17 (Zoning) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Section 19. The term and definition for "Guest House" within Section
17.34.010.G (Definitions and illustrations of terms) of Chapter 17.34 (Definition of terms)
of Title 17 (Zoning) is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Guest House" means an additional structure to a primary residence on a parcel
zoned for single-family residential, attached or detached, utilized as an incidental
use to the primary residence, but shall not be utilized as self-contained living
quarters or a secondary dwelling unit (see Secondary Dwelling Unit) and shall
not contain cooking facilities which require outside venting per the Uniform
Building Code. A guest house shall not exceed twelve hundred square feet in
area and shall contain a bathroom with a toilet, sink, and a bathtub and/or
shower if it is over eight hundred square feet.
Section 20. Section 17.28.080 (Sign Programs) of Chapter 17.28 (Sign
Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"17.28.080. Sign Programs.
A. Sign Program Required. In addition to the sign permits required by this
Chapter, certain types of signs and developments require a sign program to ensure that
all proposed signs are in harmony with other on-site signs, buildings and surrounding
developments. For existing developments without sign programs, the purpose of this
provision is to bring centers or buildings without sign programs into conformance with
the development code, while allowing existing legal signage to remain until new signage
is proposed.
1. New Sign Program. For new developments (and for approved or existing
developments that propose a major modification or propose to replace or
construct a new permanent freestanding or wall mounted sign), a new sign
program is required only if any of the following circumstances exist:
a. Whenever a shopping center, neighborhood commercial center,
office center, building, or development is greater than 100,000 square feet
in total building area and has more than a total of four permanent signs
counting wall mounted and free standing signs;
b. Whenever the development contains a historic structure; or
C. Whenever a proposed permanent sign exceeds or cannot comply
with the standards required by this Chapter due to unique characteristics
of the site or building fagade upon which the sign is placed.
2. Existing Sign Program. All approved sign programs for existing or
approved developments shall remain in full force and effect and any revision to
an approved sign program shall require a modification planning application.
B. Findings. The following findings must be made by the approval body prior
to approving a sign program:
1. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with,
and visually related to:
a. All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be
accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as
materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign type or sign shape;
b. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing
materials, colors or design motifs included in the building being identified;
and
C. Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding
land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs.
2. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required
due to changes in building tenants; and
3. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this chapter, in that the
sign program complies with all the regulations of this chapter, except that
flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location and height.
Further, to the extent the sign program does not comply with the requirements of
this chapter as to sign area, number, location and height, the proposed sign
program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives
of this chapter."
Section 21. Subsection B (Standards for Permanent Wall Mounted Signs for
Buildings with Two Stories or Less) of Section 17.28.070 (General requirements for
permanent signs) of Chapter 17.28 (Sign Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"B. Standards for Permanent Wall Mounted Signs for Buildings with Two Stories
or Less.
1. Location. Wall signs shall not be located on windows or doors.
f�#►lTi1T�
a. For multitenant buildings, only the major tenant within the suite is
permitted to have a wall sign. Subleasing tenants are not permitted to
have wall signs.
b. Maximum of four signs per business shall be allowed including all
wall mounted business identification signs, freestanding signs and freeway
signs (if any permitted). However, businesses with freestanding freeway
signs shall only be permitted a maximum of three signs, or four signs as
permitted by Section 17.28.210(A)(1)(a).
AMEN
a. For businesses with more than one permitted wall mounted sign,
the second sign shall not exceed eighty percent, third seventy percent,
and fourth sixty percent of the maximum allowable for the corresponding
frontages. This standard shall not apply to a permitted wall mounted
freeway oriented signs.
b. Wall signs shall not cover more than one square foot of sign area
per linear foot of the architectural fagade upon which the sign is located
(and no more than seventy-five percent of the surface of the building face
that the sign is located on excluding window and door areas). Maximum
area of sign shall also not exceed one square foot of sign area per linear
foot of business frontage.
C. Wall signs shall not extend more than seventy-five percent of the
suite length for multitenant buildings or building frontage for single tenant
buildings.
4. Letter Height. Minimum letter height shall be eight inches. For wall signs
in two lines or more the second line may have a minimum letter height of six
inches.
5. Design.
a. A diversity of letter types and colors shall be encouraged for wall
signs within centers to create interest.
b. The use of graphics consistent with the nature of the product to be
advertised shall be encouraged, i.e., hammer symbol for a hardware store,
mortar and pestle for a drug store.
C. Sign colors shall be selected that provide a significant contrast
between the background colors and the letters.
[:SII ..DI"i1liFiiC.7i1A
a. Internal illumination for wall signs is acceptable in the following
forms:
i. Internally illuminated channel letters;
ii. Internally illuminated reverse channel letters; or
iii. Exposed neon if used in channel letters with transparent
face or no face with the inside of channel lettering colored the same
color as the neon;
iv. Other exposed neon applications.
b. External illumination is not permitted unless approved as part of a
planning application (sign program, minor modification, major modification
or development plan as applicable)."
Section 22. Subsection B of Section 17.28.240 (Requirements for wall mounted
business or building identification signs for buildings with two stories or less in
commercial districts) of Chapter 17.28 (Sign Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"B. Maximum area of signs shall not exceed one square foot of linear foot of
architectural fagade upon which the sign is located (and shall not cover more than
seventy-five percent of the surface of the building face that the sign is located on
excluding window and door areas). Maximum area of sign shall also not exceed one
square foot of sign area per linear foot of business frontage."
Section 23. Section 17.28.325 (Freeway oriented signs in professional office
district) of Chapter 17.28 (Sign Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.28.325 Freeway oriented signs in professional office district.
Only travel oriented commercial uses such as gas stations, restaurants, fast food
establishments and hotels/motels with freeway frontage are permitted to have freeway
oriented signs. Freeway oriented signs are permitted as freestanding and wall mounted
signs. Freestanding signs may identify centers, multiple tenants, and/or single tenants.
The provisions included in Section 17.28.210 shall apply to all signs permitted by this
subsection."
Section 24. Subsection F (Government Signs) of Section 17.28.050 (Exempt
signs) of Chapter 17.28 (Sign Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"F. Government Signs. Any official government sign, including a
governmental directional sign, or a public notice or warning required by an applicable
federal, state or local law, regulation or ordinance.
1. Offsite directional signs for public college or public universities.
a. General Requirements.
i. Each campus shall be permitted no more than three (3)
signs within the City of Temecula. The Planning Director may
authorize additional signs if it is determined necessary to serve the
public.
ii. Any sign proposed within the public right-of-way must obtain
an encroachment permit and approval by the Public Works
Director.
iii. Maximum height of the pole shall be ten feet.
iv. The edge of the bottom of the sign shall not be lower than
seven feet above ground level.
V. Maximum sign area for each sign shall be six square feet.
vi. Signs shall have a royal blue background with white letters
consistent with the governmental directional signs located within
the City of Temecula and shall not contain any logos or any
information other than the name of the public college or public
university and an arrow indicating direction of the school.
Maximum letter height shall be eight inches.
b. Findings.
i. Public colleges and public universities attract a constant
influx of new visitors to the area and adequate directional signage
is necessary to ensure the safety of the community by providing
guidance to nonresidents or the general public unfamiliar with the
area. These directional signs help to ensure the general public can
safely and easily find the school.
ii. Higher public education is a local as well as a regional
priority driven by public needs and coordination between City
government and public colleges/public universities will support and
benefit the general public's pursuit of higher education.
iii. The sign is intended to serve a public college or public
university located within the City and conforms to the intent and
language of the City's General Plan. The size, shape, color, visual
elements and placement of the described sign shall be compatible
with the surrounding area and with other lawful signs and will not
detract from the character or quality of the surrounding properties."
Section 25. The entire row "Wine tasting shop (including product sale for off-site
consumption)" of Table 17.08.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Section 17.08.030 (Use regulations) of
Chapter 17.08 (Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby deleted.
Section 26. Table 17.08.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Section 17.08.030 (Use regulations) of
Chapter 17.08 (Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add two additional rows inserted
alphabetically within Subsection W within Table 17.08.030 to read as follows:
Table 17.08.030
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts
Description of Use
NC
CC
HT
SC
PO
BP
LI
W
Wine tasting shop, with or without product
sale for off-site consumption (Department
C
P
P
P
C
C
C
of Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 02
only)
Wine tasting shop, with or without product
sale for off-site consumption (Department
C
C
C
C
of Alcoholic Beverage Control License
Types other than Type 02
Section 27. The entire row "Alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an
otherwise allowable use (examples include: bowling alleys, golf courses and wine
tasting establishments)" of Table 17.08.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Section 17.08.030 (Use regulations) of
Chapter 17.08 (Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby deleted.
Section 28. Table 17.08.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Section 17.08.030 (Use regulations) of
Chapter 17.08 (Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add one additional row inserted
alphabetically within Subsection A within Table 17.08.030 to read as follows:
Table 17.08.030
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts
Description of Use
NC
CC
HT
SC
PO
BP
LI
A
Alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with
an otherwise allowable use (examples
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
include: bowling alleys and golf courses'
Section 29. Section 17.05.020.H (Time Extension) of 17.05.020 (Administrative
approval of development plan) of Chapter 17.05 (Development Plans) of Title 17
(Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"H. Time Extension. The Planning Director may, upon an application being
filed prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three
one-year extensions of time. Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year
increments only. Upon granting of an extension, the Planning Director shall
ensure that conditions of the administrative approval comply with all current
development code provisions.
1. For any time extension that administratively extends an approval
that was originally approved at a public hearing, notice of the Planning
Director's decision to administratively approve a time extension shall be
posted at the site and mailed at least ten days prior to its approval to the
applicant and its representative (as shown on the application); to the
property owner (as shown on the latest available equalized assessment
roll of the County of Riverside) or the owner's agent; to all persons whose
names and addresses appear on the latest available assessment roll of
the county of Riverside as owners of property within a distance of six
hundred (600) feet from the exterior boundaries of the site for which the
application is filed (a minimum of thirty property owners); to anyone filing a
written request for notification; and to such other persons whose property
might, in the Planning Director's judgment, be affected by the
establishment of the use or zone requested. Notice shall also be sent to
public departments, bureaus, or agencies which are determined by the
Planning Director to be affected by the application.
2. For matters that are considered to have special significance or
impact, the Planning Director may refer such items to the Planning
Commission for consideration at a noticed public hearing."
Section 30. Section 17.05.010.H (Time Extension) of 17.05.010 (Development
plan) of Chapter 17.05 (Development Plans) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
"H. Time Extensions. The Planning Director may, upon an application being
filed prior to the expiration, grant a time extension of one year (up to three extensions
may be granted). Upon granting the extension, the Planning Director shall ensure that
the development plan complies with all development code provisions.
1. For any time extension that administratively extends an approval
that was originally approved at a public hearing, notice of the Planning
Director's decision to administratively approve a time extension shall be
posted at the site and mailed at least ten days prior to its approval to the
applicant and its representative (as shown on the application); to the
property owner (as shown on the latest available equalized assessment
roll of the County of Riverside) or the owner's agent; to all persons whose
names and addresses appear on the latest available assessment roll of
the county of Riverside as owners of property within a distance of six
hundred (600) feet from the exterior boundaries of the site for which the
application is filed (a minimum of thirty property owners); to anyone filing a
written request for notification; and to such other persons whose property
might, in the Planning Director's judgment, be affected by the
establishment of the use or zone requested. Notice shall also be sent to
public departments, bureaus, or agencies which are determined by the
Planning Director to be affected by the application.
2. For matters that are considered to have special significance or
impact, the Planning Director may refer such items to the Planning
Commission for consideration at a noticed public hearing."
Section 31. The first three paragraphs of Section 17.04.010.H (Time Extension)
of 17.05.010 (Conditional Use Permits) of Chapter 17.04 (Permits) of Title 17 (Zoning)
of the Municipal Code, commencing with the words "H. Time Extension.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may..." and ending with the words
"...authorized by the grant of approval or conditional approval." are hereby amended to
read as follows:
"H. Time Extension. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior
to the expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to three one-year extensions
of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shall be granted in one-
year increments only.
An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director,
on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the
Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty
days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning
Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An
extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a
determination that the property and use are consistent with the general plan,
land use ordinance, and all other city ordinances and regulations. For any time
extension that administratively extends an approval that was originally approved
at a public hearing, notice of the Planning Director's decision to administratively
approve a time extension shall be posted at the site and mailed at least ten days
prior to its approval to the applicant and its representative (as shown on the
application); to the property owner (as shown on the latest available equalized
assessment roll of the County of Riverside) or the owner's agent; to all persons
whose names and addresses appear on the latest available assessment roll of
the county of Riverside as owners of property within a distance of six hundred
(600) feet from the exterior boundaries of the site for which the application is
filed (a minimum of thirty property owners); to anyone filing a written request for
notification; and to such other persons whose property might, in the Planning
Director's judgment, be affected by the establishment of the use or zone
requested. Notice shall also be sent to public departments, bureaus, or
agencies which are determined by the Planning Director to be affected by the
application. For matters that are considered to have special significance or
impact, the Planning Director may refer such items to the Planning Commission
for consideration at a noticed public hearing.
Any Conditional Use Permit which is not used within the time specified in the
grant of approval, or, if no time is specified, within one year of the effective date
of such approval, shall become subject to termination. The Planning Director
may extend such approval for a period not to exceed one year provided an
application requesting the extension is filed prior to the original expiration date.
For purposes of this section, "used" means the commencement of construction
activity or any activity authorized by the grant of approval or conditional
approval."
Section 32. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph,
sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final
court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive
legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and
words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by
the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance.
Section 33. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days
after its adoption.
Section 34. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this _ day of , 2010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 10- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of I , the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IG1011�Ko1l1►NllNdil:4dil:l:4:& 1
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
COUNCIL BUSINESS
Item No. 17
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Shawn Nelson, City Manager
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 10-06/Implementation of Existing 2008
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Contract Provision - PERS Contract
Amendment/Early Retirement Option
PREPARED BY: Grant Yates, Deputy City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
Waive further reading and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 10-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION,
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING TO GRANT ANOTHER
DESIGNATED PERIOD FOR TWO YEARS ADDITIONAL SERVICE
CREDIT.
3. Certify PERS Form CON -12, Certification of Governing Body's Action
4. Certify PERS Form CON -12A, Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section
7507.
5. Certify PERS Form, Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 20903.
BACKGROUND: The first action is required to finalize the February 23, 2010, City
Council action relating to implementation of the 2008 MOU provisions. The recommendation is to
waive further reading and adopt Ordinance 10-06. The second action is to adopt a resolution
enacting the early retirement service credit option in compliance with Government Code Section
20471. This Resolution will designate a period from July 1, 2010 to December 27, 2010 for
designated employees to be eligible for additional service credit.
FISCAL IMPACT: The PERS contract amendment, related to the implementation of the
MOU, will increase the City's cost for retirement by 3.05% for the employer's portion. This equates
to a total cost of approximately $384,947 annually. However, due to staffing reduction levels since
the inception of the MOU (July 1, 2008), the City will pay $58,000 less in retirement costs for FY
10/11 than what was paid in FY 08/09. Further, the City will pay $2.2 million less in overall salary
and benefits for City employees in FY 10/11 than in FY 08/09.
Regarding the early retirement option with an estimated ten employees participating, the annual cost
will be approximately $35,000 per year over the next 20 years; however, the City will save
approximately $1.1 million annually in salary, retirement and benefit costs.
ATTACHMENT:
Proposed Ordinance, w/Amendment to Contract Exhibit
Proposed Resolution
Form CON -12, Certification of Governing Body's Action
Form CON -12A, Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 7507
Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 20903
ORDINANCE NO. 10-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that
certain amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Temecula
and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, a
copy of said amendment is attached hereto, marked EXHIBIT, and by such reference
made apart hereof as though herein set out in full.
Section 2. The Mayor of the City Council is hereby authorized, empowered, and
directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of the City of Temecula.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
adoption, and prior to the expiration of 30 days from the passage thereof shall be
published at least once in the Californian, a newspaper of general circulation, published
and circulated in the City of Temecula and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be
in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this day of 12010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Ords 2010/Ords 10-06
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 10-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of February,
2010, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City
of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
R:/Ords 2010/Ords 10-06 2
Ilia,,
CaIPERS
California
Public Employees' Retirement System
EXHIBIT
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Between the
Board of Administration
California Public Employees' Retirement System
and the
City Council
City of Temecula
The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency,
hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective
December 1, 1990, and witnessed November 8, 1990, and as amended effective
October 25, 1997, August 24, 2002, July 10, 2004 and April 24, 2009 which provides for
participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree
as follows:
A. Paragraphs 1 through 11 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed
effective April 24, 2009, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs
numbered 1 through 13 inclusive:
1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age' shall
mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members.
2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement
System from and after December 1, 1990 making its employees as
hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of
the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on
election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all
amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by
express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting
agency.
PLEASE DQ NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY"
3. Public Agency agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS) and its
trustees, agents and employees, the CaIPERS Board of Administration,
and the California Public Employees' Retirement Fund from any claims,
demands, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, judgments, expenses and
costs, including but not limited to interest, penalties and attorneys fees
that may arise as a result of any of the following:
(a) Public Agency's election to provide retirement benefits,
provisions or formulas under this Contract that are different than
the retirement benefits, provisions or formulas provided under
the Public Agency's prior non-CaIPERS retirement program.
(b) Public Agency's election to amend this Contract to provide
retirement benefits, provisions or formulas that are different than
existing retirement benefits, provisions or formulas.
(c) Public Agency's agreement with a third party other than
CaIPERS to provide retirement benefits, provisions, or formulas
that are different than the retirement benefits, provisions or
formulas provided under this Contract and provided for under
the California Public Employees' Retirement Law.
(d) Public Agency's election to file for bankruptcy under Chapter 9
(commencing with section 901) of Title 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code and/or Public Agency's election to reject this
Contract with the CaIPERS Board of Administration pursuant to
section 365, of Title 11, of the United States Bankruptcy Code
or any similar provision of law.
(e) Public Agency's election to assign this Contract without the prior
written consent of the CaIPERS' Board of Administration.
(f) The termination of this Contract either voluntarily by request of
Public Agency or involuntarily pursuant to the Public Employees'
Retirement Law.
(g) Changes sponsored by Public Agency in existing retirement
benefits, provisions or formulas made as a result of
amendments, additions or deletions to California statute or to
the California Constitution.
4. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as
are excluded by law or this agreement:
a. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as
local miscellaneous members).
PLEASE LO NOT API
UN "EXHIBIT ONLY
5. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by
said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become
members of said Retirement System:
a. SAFETY EMPLOYEES.
6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member in
employment before and not on or after July 10, 2004 shall be determined
in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 55
Full).
7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member in
employment on or after July 10, 2004 and not on or after the effective date
of this amendment to contract shall be determined in accordance with
Section 21354.4 of said Retirement Law (2.5% at age 55 Full).
8. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member in
employment on or after the effective date of this amendment to contract
shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354.5 of said
Retirement Law (2.7% at age 55 Full).
9. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
a. Section 20042 (One -Year Final Compensation).
b. Sections 21624 and 21626 (Post -Retirement Survivor Allowance).
C. Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits).
d. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service).
e. Section 20903 (Two Years Additional Service Credit).
10. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions
determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with
respect to local miscellaneous members of said Retirement System.
11. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows:
a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959
Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement
Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and
liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a
single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all
local miscellaneous members.
b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of
administering said System as it affects the employees of Public
Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the
periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
C. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special
valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of
the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public
Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and
valuation required by said Retirement Law.
13. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid
by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the
end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed
by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of
contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in
connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of
errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct
payments between the employee and the Board.
B. This amendment shall be effective on the '; day of
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION1,' �''' CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREN4EN. T §1 STEM CITY OF TEMECULA
BY BY
LORI MCGR� D, CHIEF PRESIDING OFFICER
EMPLOYE DIVISION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Witness f�
Attes.
Clerk
AMENDMENT ER#1522
PERS-CON-702A
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING TO GRANT
ANOTHER DESIGNATED PERIOD FOR TWO YEARS
ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. The City Council of the City of Temecula is a contracting Public
Agency of the Public Employees' Retirement System; and
B. Said Public Agency desires to provide another designated period
for Two Years Additional Service Credit, Section 20903, based on the contract
amendment included in said contract which provided for Section 20903, Two Years
Additional Service Credit, for eligible members;
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula does seek to add another
designated period, and does hereby authorize this Resolution, indicating a desire to add
a designated period from July 1, 2010 through December 27, 2010 for eligible Local
Miscellaneous members in Community Development, Community Services, Public
Works and Administrative Services (City Clerk, City Manager/Human Resources,
Finance) operations.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this day of 12010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
r_T40r:61n
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of February, 2010, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
1►to] x.�Ko1l1►NJlNd/IAd/l1J4:&1
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Actuarial and Employer Services Branch
Public Agency Contract Services
P.O. Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
(888) CalPERS (225-7377)
CERTIFICATION OF GOVERNING BODY'S ACTION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution adopted by the
;ity Council
(governing body)
;ity of Temecula
(public agency)
on 3/23/10
(date)
Clerk/Secretary Susan W. Jones
City Clerk
Title
PERS-CON-12 (rev. 1/96)
of the
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Actuarial and Employer Services Branch
Public Agency Contract Services
P.O. Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
(888) CalPERS (225-7377)
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7507
I hereby certify that in accordance with Section 7507 of the Government Code
the future annual costs as determined by the System Actuary for the increase
in retirement benefit(s) have been made public at a public meeting of the
City Council ofthe
(governing body)
City of. Temecula
(public agency)
on 2/23/10 which is at least two weeks prior to the adoption of the
(date)
Resolution / Ordinance.
Clerk/Secretary Susan W. Jones
City Clerk
Title
Em
PERS-CON-12A (rev. 1/96)
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Employer Services Division
Contract Maintenance Unit
P.O. Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 20903
In accordance with Government Code Section 20903 and the contract between the
Public Employees' Retirement System, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby
certifies that:
Because of an impending curtailment of, or change in the manner of performing
service, the best interests of the agency will be served by granting such additional
service credit.
2. The added cost to the retirement fund for all eligible employees who retire during
the designated window period will be included in the contracting agency's
employer contribution rate for the fiscal year that begins two years after the end of
the designated period.
3. It has elected to become subject to Section 20903 because of impending
mandatory transfers, demotions, and layoffs that constitute at least 1 percent of the
job classification, department or organizational unit, as designated by the
governing body, resulting from the curtailment of, or change in the manner of
performing, its services.
4. Its intention at the time Section 20903 becomes operative is to keep all vacancies
created by retirements under this section or at least one vacancy in any position in
any department or other organizational unit permanently unfilled thereby resulting
in an overall reduction in the work force of such department or organizational unit.
THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby elects to provide the
benefits of Government Code Section 20903 to all eligible members who retire within
the designated period, 7/01/10 through 12/27/10
CITY COUNCIL
OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
MR
Attest:
Clerk/Secretary Susan W. .Tones
Date
Presiding Officer
2yr certification -PA (Rev. 4/04)
9]01V_1:MIA101 Allk I
REPORTS
Item No. 18
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Monthly Report
The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department for the month of February, 2010.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
New Cases
The Division received 59 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home
occupations including 5 applications for public hearings during the month of February.
Special Projects & Long Range Planning Activities
The Long Range Planning Division commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame
projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple
ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of
the major special projects and long range planning activities currently in progress are described in
the paragraphs below:
Temecula Regional Hospital — This project was approved by the City Council on January 22,
2008. The CEQA challenge period for the Supplemental EIR expired on February 28, 2008.
No legal challenges were filed regarding the SEIR. The CEQA challenge period for the
second reading of the Zone Change expired on March 14, 2008. The Public Works
Department and Planning Department metwith the applicant and the applicant's architect on
May 21, 2009 regarding the status of grading plans, street improvement plans, the project's
Water Quality Management Plan, and fees. Staff met with representatives from UHS on
November 20 and December 18, 2009, to discuss revisions to the phasing plan. The
approval of the Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the project would expire
on January 22, 2010, however on December 30, 2009 the applicant submitted an application
for a one year extension of time and Council approved this extension on January 26, 2010.
Staff met with the applicant on February 1, 2010 at the applicant's request to discuss
grading plan, Water Quality Management Plan, traffic signal plan, and median plan submittal
requirements. Staff also made clear the Council's expectation for grading plan and building
plan submittals and timing forthe start of construction atthe February 1 meeting as outlined
in the time extension granted by Council on January 26, 2010. Staff received updated rough
grading plans on February 18, 2010 and continues to await re -submittal of plans to address
comments regarding street improvement plans and a Water Quality Management Plan.
(FISK)
General Plan Housing Element Update —Staff submitted the final draft Housing Element to
HCD on April 9, 2009, and HCD completed its review on June 9, 2009. Comments received
on the final draft contained a handful of suggested corrections and sample language to add
to the Housing Element. Staff completed an initial study and circulated a Negative
Declaration for a 30 -day public review and comment period from July 31, 2009 through
August 31, 2009. A Planning Commission hearing was held on September 2, 2009, and the
Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Housing Element Update and
adopt the Negative Declaration. City Council adopted the Housing Element on November
10, 2009 and the Housing Element has been submitted a final time to HCD for a 90 -day
Certification review. HCD completed its review on February 17, 2010 and has asked for
further revisions in order to fully comply with State housing element law. Staff is currently
working with HCD to address the comments and has tentatively scheduled the Housing
Element revisions for a Planning Commission hearing on May 5, 2010. (SCHUMA)
Nicolas Valley Rural Preservation Area — The March 2009 community survey responses
clearly indicated that there is not support for a CFD for roadway improvements (57% of
owners and 83% of registered voters within the CFD boundary would not support). The
survey did not clearly reveal an overwhelming decision on preferred zoning for each of the
districts. A Community Meeting was held on May 21, 2009 where 55 residents attended to
inform the residents of the survey responses and discontinue this work effort. The residents
requested the opportunity to conduct their own follow up survey to determine if a majority
could agree on a zoning preference for the area, but staff has yet to receive any results.
Staff finalized and posted on the website the revisions to the Dirt Road Policy to allow more
leniency for additions and replacement of existing residences. A hydrology study was
completed in September, providing a mapped boundary of properties impacted by the 100 -
year floodplain. Staff is currently working to complete the roadway design and traffic study.
No additional technical studies/consultant work will be completed. (PETERS/KITZEROW)
SCE Triton Substation — The CPUC has granted the City's request for "Party" status in the
approval process. This is a significant step as it (1) ensures that the City will get noticed of
all actions involving this case/project, and (2) gives the City the right (versus the privilege) to
file comment/participate in the process. In addition to Party Status, staff provided a comment
letter on the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Triton Substation to be
located at the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa in the Nicolas Valley
Rural Preservation Area. It is the City's opinion that the Draft MND fails to comply with the
requirements of CEQA. The City's interests in this matter include ensuring that the proposed
Triton Substation does not adversely impact the City of Temecula and its residents,
businesses or visitors. Based on substantial inadequacies in the Draft MND, the City has
requested that the California Public Utilities Commission suspend any further consideration
of the project and prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report that fully discloses the
potential impacts of the Project and fully complies with all other CEQA requirements.
Specifically, the City contends that Site Alternative B (located further to the west along
Nicolas Road) is a superior site and would significantly reduce aesthetic impacts to the
Nicolas Valley. The City wants a full analysis of alternative sites as is required in a Draft
EI R. The City objects to any further CPUC action on the Project and is formally requesting to
become a Party in any further proceedings. The PUC staff is currently reviewing comments
received on the MND and is especially concerned with the City's comment regarding
hydrology impacts at the proposed site. (PETERS/KITZEROW)
1-15 Interregional Partnership (IRP) — Staff is working with WRCOG, SCAG, RCTC, RTA,
SANDAG, and the Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore on Phase III of the 1-15
IRP which includes the development of a Smart Growth Concept Map, which will coordinate
land use and transportation decisions to accomplish the goals of SB 375 and AB 32. The
Smart Growth Concept Map is intended to be used as the Sustainable Communities
Strategy requirement of SB 375. A draft of the plan has been completed and was presented
to the 1-15 Interregional Partnership Policy Committee on December 16, 2009. The balance
of Phase 111 program is concluding with a meeting of the Policy Committee on March 9, 2010.
(WEST/INNES)
• City Sustainability Plan— Staff continues with the preparation of the draft Sustainability Plan
by focusing on the Green House Gas Emissions Inventory (explained below) and the
development of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant — The City was awarded the initial
grant award amount of $250,000 on September 24, 2009. The total dollar amount
available to the City is $940,700. Staff has prepared the energy efficiency and
conservation strategy and submitted the application to the Department of Energy.
DOE staff has asked for revisions to the original application. Full award of the
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant is anticipated in April 2010. Grant
activities include a citywide traffic signalization project, a municipal facility retrofit
project, and residential energy efficiency improvement program. (WEST)
The Green House Gas (ghg) Emissions Inventory- The committee selected 2007 as
the base year for ghg emissions inventory analysis. There are two separate
inventories being prepared; 1) a municipal operations inventory and 2) a
communitywide inventory. Staff has worked through the various City Departments to
obtain data for the municipal operations inventory, and worked with the utility
companies and water agencies for the communitywide inventory. A draft of the
municipal operations emissions inventory has been completed. Staff presented the
results of the analysis to the Sustainability TAC on January 26, 2010 and to initiate
the next steps, which is to select a target emission reduction and identify
implementation measures that will achieve the target. The committee established a
test target of 15 percent below the base year. Staff is currently reviewing potential
reduction measures to achieve the test ghg reduction target. (WEST)
Energy Efficiency Loan Program — Staff is currently developing a program which
would allow property owners to applyfor a low-interest loan for energy improvements
that would be paid through property taxes. This program is being modeled after the
Palm Desert program as authorized under AB 811. The draft Administrative
Guidelines and loan documentation has been prepared and staff is now identifying
eligible improvements for the program. Additionally, staff is working with the
Redevelopment Agency to make energy efficiency improvements an available
component of the Residential Improvement Program and working with Western
Riverside Council of Governments on a regional approach for an AB 811 type
program. The Energy Efficiency Loan Program is a component of the Energy
Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant. (WEST)
Santa Margarita Area Annexation — On February 23, 2010, the City Council approved
resolutions to proceed with a Sphere of Influence amendment and Annexation of
approximately 4,510 acres southwest of the City including SDSU's Santa Margarita
Ecological Reserve and some hillside residential properties ("Santa Margarita Area
Annexation No. 2"). Associated Ordinances will have a second reading by the City Council
on March 9, 2010 and the associated LAFCO applications will be submitted to the Riverside
County Local Agency Formation Commission thereafter. Staff anticipates that LAFCO will
schedule a hearing in June or July of 2010. (LOWREY/RICHARDSON)
Liberty Quarry Draft Environmental Impact Report —The County of Riverside has released
the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Granite Construction's Liberty Quarry Surface
Mining Permit, Change of Zone, and Noise Ordinance Exception. The project is a 75-year
land use permit for a rock quarry and associated aggregate processing facilities, hot mix
asphalt plant, ready mix concrete plant, concrete and asphalt recycling facility, administration
and employee buildings, a maintenance facility with diesel, gas and propane tanks, water
tanks, natural gas fuel engines for electric power generation, water and gas lines, settling
ponds, truck scales, and truck and equipment parking areas within a 414 acre-site located
approximately % mile from the City's southwest boundary within the County of Riverside.
The public review and comment period was extended 60 days beyond the original
commenting deadline. The City reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report and
provided comments to the County of Riverside on November 23, 2009. The City is awaiting
a response to comments from the County. (LOWREY/RICHARDSON)
Development Code Update — Staff prepared an update of the Development Code with
various changes that include: codification of the City's current policywhich allows directional
signs for colleges and universities; amendment to large family daycares consistent with
State Law; removal of granny flats from the code consistent with State Law; updating the
square footage allowance for guest houses to be the same as what is allowed for second
dwelling units; clarifying alcohol licenses for wine tasting shops that are other than the
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 02 would require a CUP, minimizing
requirements which trigger processing a sign program, and other minor clarifications within
the Code. Planning Commission approved these Development Code amendments, with
minor revisions, on February 17, 2010 and Planning Commission recommendations will be
brought forward to the City Council March 23, 2010. (LOWREY)
Old Town Specific Plan Update —Staff is working in conjunction with consulting firms Inland
Planning+Design and Fehr and Peers (parking and circulation) to prepare an update to the
Old Town Specific Plan that addresses the ten goals and recommendations for Old Town
presented to City Council on March 25, 2008. On August 11, 2008, the Old Town Local
Review Board formed a steering committee forthe Specific Plan Update currently consisting
of Board Members Blair and Moore, with the purpose of this committee being to provide the
Old Town Local Review Board with additional opportunities to review and comment on
concepts and preliminary plans as the Specific Plan update progresses and for the
committee to report back to the other Board members on the progress of the update.
Commissioners Guerriero and Kight are also members of the Steering Committee, which
most recently met on November 5, 2009 to review progress on the proposed sign section for
the Specific Plan Amendment. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been completed
for the project and the 45-day EIR public review period is underway and will conclude on
April 14, 2010. Staff has completed the first draft of the Specific Plan Amendment and
intends to hold Council briefings in March; to present the Draft Specific Plan and EIR to the
Old Town Specific Plan Steering Committee and the community on March 16 and 18,2010;
to the Old Town Local Review Board on April 12,2010; to the Planning Commission on April
21, 2010; and to City Council on May 11, 2010. (FISK/INNES/LOWREY)
SCAG 2012 RTP - The update to the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is underway. The RTP will include a
Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS); a new component to the RTP as a result of the
passage of SB 375. Staff will be working with the abovementioned agencies throughout the
update process. The first order of business is to provide input into the Base Year Conditions
and General Plan Based Growth Forecast/Distribution and Land use for years 2020 and
2035. (WEST)
WRCOG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan — Staff is working with Western Riverside
Council of Governments on a multi -jurisdictional network of bike and pedestrian routes which
will link transit and regional points of interest to local bicycle and multi -use trails linkages.
The first meeting was held on January 19, 2010 to review the components of the plan. The
project is funded through the SCAG Compass Blueprint program and is expected to be
completed by summer of 2010. (WEST)
Planning Agenda Report
2/1/2010 through 2/28/2010
1. Recently Approved
APN #
• PA10-0009 Bob/Gary's Straw Stand TUP 921700016 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS
A Major Temporary Use Permit for Bob and Gary's Field Fresh Berries open from March 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010,
seven days a week from 9:30 a. m. until dusk. The 16'x 12' stand will be located in a landscaped area along
Margarita Road and the southeast entrance to the center, setback approximately 40 feet from Margarita with
approximately six parking spaces provided for customers located at 42225 Margarita Road (Palomar Village)
Submitted Date Approved Date
1/19/2010 Feb 10 2010
APN #
• PA10-0019 PromenadeCarnival MTUP 910420005 ERIC JONES
A Major Temporary Use Permit to conduct a carnival at the Promenade Mall west parking lot from February 25
through February 28 featuring rides, food, and games of chance
Submitted Date Approved Date
1/28/2010 Feb 10 2010
1 of 4
Planning Agenda Report
2/1/2010 through 2/28/2010
Scheduled for Hearing
APN #
• PA09-0268 Feduniw Family Day Care Minor 957550002 ERIC JONES
A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow a home-based family day care facility to operate with up to 12 children at
30713 East Gate Parkway
Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date Directors Hearing
9/2/2009 Feb 25 2010
APN #
• PA08-0125 Temecula Village PDO -5 Amend1 944290012 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS
A Zoning Amendment to modify PDO -5 (Temecula Village) to permit Grocery Stores up to 15,000 square feet with a
Conditional Use Permit (currently allowed up to 10,000 SF w/CUP). Other changes include reducing landscape
buffer/setback along Rancho California Road from 25 to 20 feet and miscellaneous clean-up/references to previous
approvals. Temecula Village is located along the south side of Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road.
(Associated projects PA08-0122 and PA08-0123 - Fresh and Easy DP/CUP) Pending City Council hearing (date to
be determined).
Submitted Date
DRC Meeting Date
Planning Commision
6/4/2008
6/26/2008
Oct 15 2008
APN #
• PA08-0117 T -Mobile Cell Tower Redhawk 962040012 ERIC JONES
A Conditional Use Permit and Antenna Facility Application for a cell tower facility developed as three 35' flag poles
located 45100 Redhawk Parkway. An equipment enclosure will be incorporated with the project. (Previous
Application: PR07-0020)
Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision
5/22/2008 Mar 17 2010
2 of
3
Planning Agenda Report
2/1/2010 through 2/28/2010
New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting
APN #
• PA10-0052 Taste of Temecula Valley 922030032 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS
A Special Event Permit for "Taste of Temecula Valley" located in the Town Square on Sat. April 17th (10am-10pm)
and Sun. April 18th (10am-6pm). This event is a festival of food and entertainment designed to showcase local
restaurants in the Temecula area with each restaurant serving samples and some larger portions. Wine will also be
sampled. Live entertaimmnet will be provided on both days. No additional street closures required. Event is a non-
profit organized by the Temecula Foundation for Excellance in Education to raise funds to offset the losses to arts
sciences and technology from budget shortfalls.
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
2/23/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0054 Musicians wksp Major TUP 909290036 ERIC JONES
A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow the Musicians Work Shop to conduct The Temecula Valley International
Jazz Festival located at 27455 Tierra Alta Way on July 9th, 10th, and 11th. Approximalty 3,500 - 5,000 participants
are expected to attend. (APN:909-290-062).
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
2/24/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0063 Barno's Liquor Store Minor CUP 960020059 ERIC JONES
A Conditional Use Permit to operate a liquor store located at 32475 Temecula Parkway, Suite 103 A (APN: 960-020-
059). (Related Application: PA10-0064 - Public Convenience or Necessity)
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
3/2/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0067 Rotary Temecula Chall Triathlo 962020009 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS
A Special Event Permit for Temecula Rotary's Temecula Challenge Triathlon at Great Oak High School on
Saturday, April 18, 2010 from 5 a.m. to noon.
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
3/4/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0067 Rotary Temecula Chall Triathlo 962020009 CHRISTINE DAMKO
A Special Event Permit for Temecula Rotary's Temecula Challenge Triathlon at Great Oak High School on
Saturday, April 18, 2010 from 5 a.m. to noon.
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
3/4/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0068 Rotary Temecula Challenge Bike 922073024 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS
A Special Event Permit for the Temecula Rotary Club's Temecula Challenge Bike Ride to be held on Saturday, April
17, 2010 between 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. The event will begin at the City -owned parking lot behind the Stampede in Old
Town and continue south down Old Town Front Street, east on Temecula Parkway, south on Pechanga Parkway to
Rainbow Canyon past the City -limits to Mt. Palomar. The event includes a 25/50/100 mile fun bike ride.
3 of
Planning Agenda Report
2/1/2010 through 2/28/2010
APN #
• PA10-0036 Fall Rod Run 2010 922026008 CHRISTINE DAMKO
A Special Event Permit for the Fall Rod Run to take place on October 8th and 9th in Old Town. Front St. will be
closed for the event.
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
2/11/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0045 Springhlll Sultes Type 20/PCN 921060047 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS
A Minor Modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit (PA09-0174) to allow Springhill Suites by Marriott hotel
a Type 20 ABC license to permit the sale of beer and wine from the hotel's gift shop. Springhill Suites' current CUP
allows for a Type 70 ABC license for hotel guest'happy hour' complimentary alcohol. The request also includes a
Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity. The property is located at 28220 Jefferson Avenue, just north of
Rancho California Road.
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
2/16/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0002 Mm's Mlnor CUP 910290005 ERIC JONES
A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow Mimi's Cafe, located at 40705 Winchester Road, to upgrade their existing
liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
1/11/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0024 Rod Run 922026008 CHRISTINE DAMKO
Spring Rod Run to take place in Old Town on Friday, March 12 and Saturday, March 13 with Front Sreet street
closure
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
2/1/2010 TBD
4 of
Submitted Date
Anticipated DRC Meeting Date
No Hearing Planned
3/4/2010
TBD
APN #
• PA10-0036 Fall Rod Run 2010 922026008 CHRISTINE DAMKO
A Special Event Permit for the Fall Rod Run to take place on October 8th and 9th in Old Town. Front St. will be
closed for the event.
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
2/11/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0045 Springhlll Sultes Type 20/PCN 921060047 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS
A Minor Modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit (PA09-0174) to allow Springhill Suites by Marriott hotel
a Type 20 ABC license to permit the sale of beer and wine from the hotel's gift shop. Springhill Suites' current CUP
allows for a Type 70 ABC license for hotel guest'happy hour' complimentary alcohol. The request also includes a
Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity. The property is located at 28220 Jefferson Avenue, just north of
Rancho California Road.
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
2/16/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0002 Mm's Mlnor CUP 910290005 ERIC JONES
A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow Mimi's Cafe, located at 40705 Winchester Road, to upgrade their existing
liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
1/11/2010 TBD
APN #
• PA10-0024 Rod Run 922026008 CHRISTINE DAMKO
Spring Rod Run to take place in Old Town on Friday, March 12 and Saturday, March 13 with Front Sreet street
closure
Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned
2/1/2010 TBD
4 of
Item No. 19
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report - February 2010
PREPARED BY: Sue Steffen, Executive Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file
On February 3, 2010 Council Member Ron Roberts traveled to Los Angeles, California to attend the
Southern California Association of Governments Executive/Administration Committee,
Transportation Committee, and Regional Council meetings.
Attachment: Meeting Agendas
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION of
GOVERNMENTS
Main Office
81 a West Seventh Street
12th Floor
Los Angeles, California
90017-3435
t(213)236-1800
((2171236-1825
wwwscag.ca.gov
Officers
President
Jon Edney. El Centro
Ant Vice President
Larry M<Callon, Highland
Second Vice President
Pam O'Connor, Santa Monica
Immediate Past President
Richard Dixon, Lake Forest
Executive/Administration
Committee Chair
Jon Edney, EI Centro
Policy Committee Chairs
Community, Economic and
Human Development
Carl Morehouse, Ventura
Energy&Environment
Keith Hanks, Azusa
Transportation
MikeTen, South Pasadena
MEETING OF THE
Thursday, February 4, 2010
9:00 a.m. — 10:00 a.m.
SCAG Offices
818 W. 7th Street,
Board Room
Los Angeles, CA
(213) 236-1800
12th Floor
90017
If members of the public wish to review the attachments
or have any questions on any of the agenda items,
please contact Deby Salcido at (213) 236-1993 or via
email salcido R-scaa.ca.gov
Agendas IS, Minutes for the Executive/Administration
Committee are also available at:
www.seag.ca.gov/committees/eac.htm
SCAG, in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), will
accommodate persons who require a modification of accommodation in
order to participate in this meeting. If you require such assistance, please
contact SLAG at (213) 236-1928 at least 72 hours in advance of the
meeting to enable SCAG to make reasonable arrangements. To request
documents related to this document in an alternative format, please
contact (213) 236-1928.
The Regional Council is comprised of 83 elected officials representing 189 cities, six counties,
six County Transportation Commissions and a Tribal Government representative within Southern California.
Ft XECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
I:i�1=1
FEBRUARY 4, 2010
TIME PG#
The Executive/Administration Committee may consider and act upon any of the items
listed on the agenda regardless of whether they are listed as information or action items.
1.0 CALL'1'O ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
(Hoa. Jon Edney, Chub)
2.0 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD — Members of the public desiring to speak on items on the
agenda, or items not on the agenda, but within the purview of the Executive/Administration
Committee, must fill out and present a speaker's card to the Assistant Prior to speaking.
Comments will be limited to three minutes. The chair may limit the total time for all comments
to twenty minutes.
3.0 REVIEW AND PRIORITIZE AGENDA ITEMS
4.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
4.1 Approval Items
4.1.1 Minutes of January 7, 2010 Meeting Attachment 1
4.1.2 Penalty for Late Receipt of Consultant Attachment 7
Invoices
4.1.3 Sponsorship of Southern California Leadership Attachment 9
Network's California Connections Initiative
i$�_0k
4.1.4 Sponsorshiu of Move LA Event ($1,000) Attachment 11,
4.1.5 Sponsorship of Inaugural th•ban Land Institute Attachment 13
Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) Marketplace
($2,500)
4.2 Receive & File
4.2.1 Contracts/Purchase Orders between Attachment 15
$5A0 - $200,000
4.2.2 SCAG Subcommittees and Task Forces Attachment 34
EAC ... rebruary20I0
DOCIII55471 SALCIDO
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
EXECUTIVE/All MINISTRATION COMMIT'T'EE
TIME PG#
5.0 ACTION ITEMS
5.1 Administrative Authority to Implement Attachment 5 min 37
Pendine ".lobs 2" Bill
(Sharon Neely, Interim Deputy Executive Director)
Recommended Action: Authorize SLAG Executive
Director to take all necessary administrative actions in
order to facilitate the implementation of the tederal
".lobs 2" pending bill and assure that the region will he
able to receive all transportation related federal funds
eligible to it under the provisions of the Legislation and
report such actions at the following meeting
5.2 SCAG Clean Cities Program/ Attachment 10 min 39
Grant Projects with SANBAG and SCA MD
(Hason Iklu•ata, Executive Director)
Recommended Action: Authorize the SCAG Executive
Director or his designee to (1) negotiate and execute
an agreement with the San Bernardino Associated
Governments (SANBAG) for SCAG to perform
marketing/outreach tasks to support the J.B. Hunt LNG
Truck Project: Made in America Initiative; (2) negotiate
and execute agreements with the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for SCAG to
Perform marketing/outreach tasks to support the LIPS
Ontario -Las Vegas LNG Corridor Expansion Project and
The Heavy -Duty Natural Gas Drayage Truck Replacement
Initiative Project; and (3) at his discretion, terminate the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOIJ) with the
Southern California Economic Partnership (The
Partnership) for the annual operation of the Clean Cities
Program.
5.3 Contract Amendment Greater than 30% Attachment 5 min 41
(Leyton Morgan, SCAG Stafn
Recommended Action: Approve Amendment
EAC - February 2010
DOC4155471 SAL.CIDO
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
6.0
7.0
8.0
90
EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 4, 2010
TwE PG#
INFORMATION ITEMS
6.1 Draft -FY 10-11 Comprehensive Budget Update Attachment 15 min 45
(Wayne Moore, Chief Financial Officer)
6.2 Follow-up on Contracts Greater than $200,000 Attachment 5 min 301
(Leyton Morgan, SCAC Shifa
CFO MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
(Wayne Moore, Chief Financial Officer)
CLOSED SESSION
8.1 Public Employee Performance Evaluation
Govt. Code 1�54949�
Title: Executive Director
FUTURE, AGENDA rrEMS
Any Committee member or staff desiring to place items on a
Future agenda may make such request.
10.0 ANNOUNCEMENTS
11.0 ADJOURNMENT
Attachment 5 min 305
The next regular meeting of the Executine/Adininistration Conuid tce is scheduled
for Thursday, March 4, 2010 of the SCAC Los Angeles office.
GAC; - February 2010
DOC#155471 SALCIDO
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION Of GOVERNMENTS
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
MEETING OF THE
ASSOCIATION of
GOVERNMENTS
MaintNfice Thursday, February 4, 2010
818West Seventh Street 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
12th Floor
Los Angeles, SCAG Offices
90017.3435
t (213) 2361800 818 W. 7th Street, 12th Floor
((213)236-1825 Board Room
� scaacaAov Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 236-1800
Officers
President
Jon Edney,rey, El Centro
EI
If members of the public wish to review the attachments or
First Vice President
have any questions on any of the agenda items, please
Larry McCallon, Highland -
contact Deby Salcido at (213) 236-1993 or via email at
Second vice President
salcidoCa�scaa.ca.-a
Pam O'Connor, Santa Monica
ImmediateLioret
Richard Dixon,Lake
n, Forest
Agendas & Minutes for the Transportation Committee are
also available at: www.scaa.ca.aov/oommittees/tc.htm
Executive/Administmdon
Committee Chair
Jon Edney, El Centro
SCAG, in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), will
Policy Committee chairs
accommodate persons who require a modification of accommodation in order
Community,Emnomicand
to participate in this meeting. If you require such assistance, please contact
Human Development
SCAG at (213) 236-1928 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting to enable
Cad Morehouse,ventura
SCAG to make reasonable arrangements. To request documents related to
Energy&Environment
this document in an alternative format, please contact (213) 236-1928.
Keith Hanks,Awsa
Transportation
MikeTen,South Pasadena
The Regional Council is comprised of 83 elected officials representing 189 cities, six counties,
six County Transportation Commissions and aTribal Government representative within Southern California.
1.7.10
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 49 2010
The Transportation Committee may consider and act upon any of the items listed
on the agenda regardless of whether they are listed as information or action items.
1.0 CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
(Hon. Mike Ten, Chair)
2.0 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD — Members of the public desiring to speak on
items on the agenda, or items not on the agenda, but within the purview of the
Transportation Committee, must fill out and present a speaker's card to
the Assistant prior to speaking. Comments will be limited to three minutes.
The Chairman may limit the total time for all comments to twenty minutes.
3.0 REVIEW AND PRIORITIZE AGENDA ITEMS
4.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
4.1 AonrovalItem
4.1.1 Minutes of January 7.2010 Meeting Attachment
5.0 ACTION ITEMS
5.1 Draft 2008 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Attachment
Amendment 93 and Draft 2008 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP)
Consistency Amendment #08-34
(Ryan,Kao, SCAG Slaffi
Staff has been working with the County Transportation
Commissions on the Draft 2008 RTP Amendment #3
and Draft 2008 RTIP Consistency Amendment and
is finalizing the conformity analysis.
Recommended Action: Authorize staff to release
the Draft Amendments for a 30 -day public review
and comment period contingent upon staff
determining a positive conformity finding.
TIME PG#
10 min 10
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA unxyzola
ASSOCIATIONofGOVERNMENTS pock TC—PssxEBR
Salcido -1/27!2010 - 525:46 PM
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 49 2010
............................................................................
ACTION ITEMS — Cont'd
..................
TIME PG#
5.2 Upcoming Election of Policy Committee Chairs and Attachment 5 min 13
Vice -Chairs
(Joann Africa, Chief Counsel)
Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff
regarding the process for handling of the upcoming
elections for the Chair and Vice -Chair positions of the
Policy Committees, which has been recommended be
held at the March 2010 Policy Committee meetings.
6.0 INFORMATION ITEMS
6.1 Administrative Authority to Implement Pending Attachment 5 min 15
"Jobs 2" Bill
(Sharon Neely, Interim Deputy Executive Director)
Sharon Neely will provide information on the pending
"Jobs 2" Bill.
6.2 Metro's LongRange Transportation Plan (LRTP) Attachment 20 min 17
(Brad McAllester, Metro)
Metro staff will provide an update on the recently
adopted Long Range Transportation Plan for
Los Angeles County.
6.3 Regional Congestion Pricing Study
(Annie Nam, SCAG Staff
Staff will present an update on the status and progress
of SCAG's Regional Congestion Pricing Study.
7.0 CHAIR'S REPORT
8.0 STAFF REPORT
(Naresh Amatya, SCAG Staf )
ii
Attachment 20 min 18
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION Of GOVERNMENTS TC-FEBRUAZY2010
Doc# 155483
Salcido - 1/282010 - 9:57:02 AM
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 49 2010
....................................................................................................
9.0 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
TIME PG#
Any Committee member or staff desiring to place items on a future agenda may
make such a request.
10.0
11.0 ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the Transportation Committee is scheduled for Thursday,
March 4, 2010 at the SCAG Los Angeles office.
iii
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION Of GOVERNMENTS TC—FFBRUARY2010
DOO 155483
Salcido -1/27/2010 - 5:25:46 PM
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION Of
GOVERNMENTS
Main Office
018 West Seventh Street
12th Floor
Los Angeles, California
90017-3435
t(213)236-1800
f(2i3)236-10x5
vnnv.ttaryca.ryov
Officers
President
Jon Edney, El Centro
First Vice President
Larry McCallon, Highland
Second Vice President
Pam O'Connor, Santa Monica
Immediate past President
Richard Dixon, Lake Forest
Executive/Administration
Committee Chair
Jan Edney. EI Centro
Policy Committee Chairs
Comn unity, Economic and
Human Development
Carl Morehouse Ventura
Energy & Environment
Keith Hanks, Azusa
Transportation
Mike Ten, South Pasadena
No. 516
MEETING OF THE
Thursday, February 4, 2010
12:15 p.m. — 2:00 p.m.
SCAG Offices
818 W. 7th Street, 12th Floor
Board Room
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 236-1800
If members of the public wish to review the attachments
or have any questions on any of the agenda items,
please contact Deby Salcido at (213) 236-1993 or via
email at salcidoosca%ca.gov. In addition, regular
meetings of the Regional Council may be viewed live or
on demand at www.scag.ca.gov/sca.qty
Agendas & Minutes for the Regional Council are also
available at: www.scaci.ca.gov/committees/rc.htm
SCAG, in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), will
accommodate- persons who require a modification of accommodation in
order to participate in this meeting. If you require such assistance, please
contact SCAG at (213) 236.1928 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting
to enable SCAG to make reasonable arrangements. To request documents
related to this document in an alternative format, please contact (213) 236-
1928.
The Regional Council is comprised of 83 elected officials representing 189 cities, six counties,
six County Transportation Commissions and a Tribal Government representative within Southern California.
1.7.10
REGIONAL COUNCIL
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 49 2010
PAGE#
Regional Council may consider and act upon any of the items listed on the agenda
regardless of whether they are lister/ as information or action items.
1.0 CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
(Hou. Jon Edney, President)
2.0 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD — Members of the public desiring to speak on items on the
agenda, or items not on the agenda, but within the purview of the Council, must fill out
and present a speaker's card to the Assistant prior to speaking. Comments will be limited to
three minutes. The President may limit the total time for all comments to twenty minutes.
3.0 REVIEW AND PRIORITIZE AGENDA ITEMS
4.0 COMMITTEE REPORTS/ACTION ITEMS
4.1 Executive/Administration Committee (EAC) Report
(Hon. Jon Edney, Chair)
4.1.1 Administrative Authority to Implement Pending Attachment
"Jobs 2" Bill
(Sharon Neely, Interim Deputy Executive Director)
Recommended Action: Authorize SCAG Executive
Director to take all necessary administrative actions
in order to facilitate the implementation of the federal
"Jobs 2" pending bill, and assure that the region
will be able to receive all transportation -related
federal funds eligible to it under the provisions
of the Legislation and report such actions at the
following meeting.
4.1.2 SCAG Clean Cities Pro rg am Update/F-85 Attachment 3
(Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director)
Recommended Action: I)Review the new information
provided below; and 2) Approve the action taken by the
Executive/Administration Committee (EAC) on January
26, 2010, to proceed with the grant award process relating
to the "SCAG Clean Cities Coalition Expanding California's
E85 Ethanol Fueling Infrastructure" project (`8-85 Project").
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
REGIONAL COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 49 2010
PAGE#
COMMITTEE REPORTS/ACTION ITEMS — Cont'd
4.1.3 SCAG Clean Cities Program Update/Grant Projects Attachment 1.1
With SANBAG and SCAOMD
(Hasan 1kbratu, Executive Director)
Recommended Action: Authorize the SCAG Executive
Director or his designee to (1) negotiate and execute an
agreement with the San Bernardino Associated
Governments (SANBAG) for SCAG to perform
marketing/outreach tasks to support the J.B. Hunt LNG
Truck Project: Made in America Initiative; (2) negotiate
and execute agreements with the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) for SCAG to perform
marketing/outreach tasks to support the UPS Ontario -Las
Vegas LNG Corridor Expansion Project and the
Heavy -Duty Natural Gas Drayage Truck Replacement
Initiative Project; and (3) at his discretion, terminate the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the
Southern California Economic Partnership
(The Partnership) for the annual operation of the Clean
Cities Program.
4.1.4 Contract Amendment Greater than 30% of the Attachment 13
Contract's Original Value
(Leyton Morgan, SCAG Stafo
Recommended Action: Approve Amendment 2
to Contract 09 -033 -CI in the amount of $34,590
to continue services for region -wide (6 counties and
14 subregions) outreach, associated with the
implementation of Senate Bill 375.
4.1.5 Draft FY 10-11 Comprehensive Budget Update Attachment 17
(Wayne Moore, Chief Financia/ Offices)
Recommended Action: For information purposes
only; no action to be taken.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
REGIONAL COUNCIL
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 4, 2010
PAGE#
COMMITTEE REPORTS/ACTION ITEMS — Cont'd
4.l .6 Follow up on Contracts $200,000 or Greater Attachment 225
(Leyton Morgan, SCAG Staff
Recommended Action: For information purposes
only; no action to be taken.
4.2 Legislative/Communications and Membership
Committee Report
(Hon. Glen Becerra, Clair)
4.2.1 Federal and State Legislative Update Attachment 229
(Sharon Neely, Interan Deputy Executive Director)
Recommendcd Action: For infonnation purposes
only; no action to be taken.
4.3 Community, Economic and Human Development
Committee (CEHD) Report
(Hon. Carl Morehouse, Clair)
4.3.1 Report from Fiscalization of Land Use Subcommittee Attachment 276
(Peter Brandenburg, SCAG Slaff
Recommended Actions: Receive report and discuss
proposed options for next steps on reform
regarding Fisealization of land use.
4.4 Energy and Environment Committee (EEC) Rcnort
(Hon. Keith Hanks, Chair)
4.5 Transportation Committee (TC) Renort
(Hoz. Mike Ten, Chair)
5.0 PRESIDENT'S REPORT
5.1 New Committee Appointments
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ill
ASSOCIATION Of GOVERNMENTS
REGIONAL COUNCIL
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 4, 2010
6.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
PAGE#
6.1 Approval Items
6.1.1
Minutes of January 7, 2010 Meetine
Attachment
316
6.1.2
Sponsorship of Southern California Leadership
Attachment
325
Network's California Connections Initiative ($5,000)
6.1.3
Sponsorship of Move LA Event ($1,000)
Attachment
327
6.1.4
Sponsorship of Inaugural Urban Land Institute
Attachment
329
Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) Marketplace
($2,500)
6.1.5
Penalty for Late Receipt of Consultant Invoices
Attachment
331
6.2 Receive & File
6.2.1
Contracts/Purchase Orders between
Attachment
333
$5,000 - $200.000
6.2.2
SCAG Subcommittees and Task Forces
Attachment
350
7.0 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
(Hasan 1khrata, Executive Director)
7.1 Monthly ReporC
7.2 Nominating Process for 2010-11 SCAG Officers Attachment 353
8.0
8.1 CFO Monthly Financial Report Attachment 354
(Wayne Moore, CFO)
9.0 ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the Regional Council is scheduled for Thursday,
March 4, 2010, at lite SCAG Los Angeles office.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IV
ASSOCIATION Of GOVERNMENTS
Item No. 20
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Andre O'Harra, Chief of Police
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report
The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of
February 2010.
PATROL SERVICES
Overall calls for police service..................................................................................................
2274
"Priority One" calls for service.......................................................................................................
46
Average response time for "Priority One" calls.............................................................5.51
Minutes
VOLUNTEERS
3
Volunteer administration hours...................................................................................................
174
SpecialEvents..............................................................................................................................
17
Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours.......................................................................................
806
Reserve officer hours (patrol).......................................................................................................
19
Traininghours.............................................................................................................................
147
TotalVolunteer hours................................................................................................................
1131
CRIME PREVENTION/GRAFFITI
Crime prevention workshops /Neighborhood watch meetings conducted .....................................
7
Residential/business security surveys conducted..........................................................................
0
Businessesvisited........................................................................................................................
12
Businesses visited for past crime follow-up....................................................................................
3
Crime prevention articles................................................................................................................
0
Total square footage of graffiti removed..................................................................................
7,678
Number of Graffiti Locations........................................................................................
135
OLD TOWN STOREFRONT
Total customers served............................................................................................................... 303
Setsof fingerprints taken.............................................................................................................. 53
Policereports filed........................................................................................................................ 16
Citationssigned off....................................................................................................................... 90
Totalreceipts..................................................................................................................... $5,400.50
SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM (SET TEAM)
On sight felony arrests .........................................
On sight misdemeanor arrests .............................
Felony arrest warrants served .............................
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served ..................
Follow-up investigations .......................................
Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks ..............................
Massage Compliance Checks ............................
Crime Free Housing Checks ...............................
Citations issued for hazardous violations...................................................................................
494
D.U.I. checkpoints conducted.........................................................................................................
0
D.U.I. Arrest..................................................................................................................34
35
Non -hazardous citations.............................................................................................................
341
Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations.......................................................
155
Neighborhood Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) citations...................................................................
24
Parkingcitations..........................................................................................................................
117
SchoolZones..............................................................................................................24
Seatbelts..................................................................................................................24
CellPhone Cites.............................................................................................................
103
Injurycollisions..............................................................................................................................
25
Presentations.............................................................................................................0
INVESTIGATIONS
BeginningCaseload.................................................................................................................... 114
TotalCases Assigned.................................................................................................................. 33
TotalCases Closed....................................................................................34
Number of community seminars/presentations conducted............................................................ 0
PROMENADE MALL TEAM
Calls for service ........................
Felony arrest/filings..................
Misdemeanor arrest/filings.......
Vehicle burglaries ....................
Vehicle thefts ............................
Total receipts ............................
Felonyarrests.................................................................................................................................
1
Misdemeanor arrests......................................................................................................................
9
Citations........................................................................................................................................
35
Youthcounseled........................................................................................................................
209
Presentations............................................................................................................
3
IN14�:IeCKK�1�L ��e1-31������e1P�
Schoolvisits..................................................................................................................................
59
Homevisits......................................................................................................................................
0
Presentations (Jail Tour)...................................................................................................1
DrugTests...............................................................................................................11
TruancySweep..........................................................................................................0
Item No. 21
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the attached Department of Public Works Monthly
Activity Reports for the month of February 2010.
ITI] 7 e,\ �[11J111
TO: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works
FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Supervisor K
DATE: March 8, 2010 1989
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - February, 2010
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the
month of February, 2010:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 41
B. Total signs installed 23
C. Total signs repaired 26
D. Banners 152
II. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 5
III. ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
B. Down Spouts
C. Under sidewalks
3,902
64
111
0
0
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0
VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
VII. STENCILING
A. 127 New and repainted legends
B. 0 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
C. 0 Bull Nose
D. 39 Thermal Plastic
135
7,678
R:\ MAINTAIMMOACTRPT
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 90 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair,
A. C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 123 service order requests for the month of
January, 2010.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 55 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street
emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of February, 2010 was $43,652.00 compared to
$131,788.00 for the month of January, 2010
Account No. 5402 $ 21,852.00
Account No. 5401 $ 21,800.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ -0-
Electronic
0 -
Electronic Copies:
Amer Attar, Principal Engineer - (Capital Improvements)
Dan York, City Engineer
Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer - (Traffic Division)
R:%M TNTMMMOACTR
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Date Submitted: 08 -Mar -10
MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED
Submitted By: GREG BUTLER
FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010
Prepared By: RODNEY TIDWELL
Concrete Square Feet
2ND HALF
Asphalt Square Feet
0
97
0
2
0
Concrete Square Feet
0
0
348
440
Drainage Channels
3
2,2
6
8
TOTAL COSTS
$82,768.00
0
$104,568.00
0
$131,658.00
3,2
70
197
2,6
CONTRACT STRIPING
349
719
123
Striping Linear Feet
0
0
1,972,023
SandblastingLinear Feet
0
0
0
TREE CONTRACTORS
Trees Trimmed
356
767
1,575
Trees Removed
1
5
19
TOTAL COSTS
$18.070.00
czo ogg nn
2uF Ong nn
R.O.W. SPRAYING
SQUARE FEET
TOTAL COSTS
CITY MAINTENANCE CREW
Signs Replaced
Signs Installed
Catch Basins Cleaned
Trees Trimmed
R.O.W. Weed Abatement
New & Repainted Legends
After Hours Call Outs
Service Order Requests
Graffiti Removal
TOTAL COSTS
467
56
97
2
11
34
1
348
459
2,2
55
60
5
0
0
3,2
70
197
2,6
294
349
719
123
213
6
N V.W NWRV JNT, WORK WMPLEIIOTO JUNE
ASPHALT AC
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
STREET MAINTENANCE
FISCAL YEAR 2009 - 2010
Date Submitted: March 8, 2010
Submitted By: Greg Butler
Prepared By: Rodney Tidwell
TOTAL COST FOR -TI
COST FOR THIS FISCAL
MADOu 14A Vose
Square Footage:
1,145 $3,400.65
$147,112.95
$220,978.22
Tons
15Elm
$0.00
$0.00
TTER REPAIR
$134,036.43
$131,385.09
Square Footage:
0 $0.00Imm.
$7,575.00
$0.00
PCC Yards:
0 $0.00
$0.00
$23,765.00
STRIPING LINEAR FEET:
0
$0.00
$134,036.43
$131,385.09
IN-HOUSE PAINTING LEGENDS:
70
$560.00 _-�
$20,928.00
$28,408.00
SIGNS REPLACED
Material:
56
$2,800.00
$16,600.00
$32,500.00
Labor:
$1,477.84
$8,761.48
$17,153.50
SIGNS INSTALLED
Material:
- 11
$550.00
$7,600.00
$4,750.00
Labor:
$290.29
$4,011.28
$2,506.66
GRAFFITI
Square Footage:
4,202
awn
DRAINAGE CHANNELS CLEANED
Basins:
348
$9,183.72
$62,531.94
$109,070.57
Channels:
3
$82,768.00
$119,493.00
$103,237.78
IN-HOUSE TREES TRIMMED:
55
$1,445.95 _,. _ _ a
$14,113.15
$11,453.26
SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS:
123
AFTER HOURS CALL OUTS:
�-,.
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
RAMAINTAIMMOACTRn
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of February, 2010
DATE
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL COST
ACCOUNT
STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE
OF WORK
SIZE
GONTRACT07t_WEST
COAST ARBORFS'FS.,_
777777
Date:
02/01/10
CITYWIDE
ANNUAL TREE TRIMMING
TOTAL COST
$ 13,720.00
Date:
02/26/10
CITYWIDE
ANNUAL TREE TRIMMING
TOTAL COST
$ 8,132.00
Date:
TOTAL COST
Date:
TOTAL COST
.CONTRAG`FOR
, _,
BECKER ENGINEERING
Date:
02/02/10
DE PORTOLA AT MARGARITA
REMOVAL OF SAND, SILT & DEBRIS CAUSED
FROM
RECENT STORMS
TOTAL COST
$ 9,365.00
Date:
02/02/ 10
JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AT TEMECULA
REMOVAL OF SAND, SILT AND DEBRIS
CAUSED FROM
PARKWAY
RECENT RAIN STORMS
TOTAL COST
$ 7,815.00
Date:
02/01/10
JOHN WARNER RETENTION POND
REMOVAL OF SAND, SILT AND DEBRIS
CAUSED FROM
RECENT RAIN STORMS
TOTAL COST
$46,620.00
Date:
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401
$21,800.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402
$21,852.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402
- 0 -
RAMAINTAIMMOACTRn
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2010
BA
}A umo
fi i f4P X 07tI1
5 �
''',
02/01/10
MANZANO ROAD
AC OVERLAY
560
2.5
02/02/10
MANZANO ROAD
AC OVERLAY
588
WOLF VALLEY AT CAMINO SAN JOSE
AC OVERLAY
15
JEDEDIAH SMITH AT DE PORTOLA
POTHOLE
5
PIO PICO AT SANTIAGO
POTHOLE
25
YNEZ AT PAUBA
POTHOLE
1
3
02/03/10
MANZANO ROAD
AC OVERLAY
620
CITYWIDE
POTHOLES
8
5
02/04/10
N/B MARGARITA AT JEDEDIAH SMITH
R & R
300
8
02/08/10
CITYWIDE
POTHOLES
107
3
RANCHO VISTA AT YNEZ
POTHOLES
20
02/09/10
CITYWIDE
POTHOLES
97
02/10/10
YNEZ AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
POTHOLES
4
02/11/10
REDHAWK AT WOLF VALLEY
R & R
241
6
02/16/10
REDHAWK AT WOLF VALLEY
R & R
220
6
02/17/10
REDHAWK AT WOLF VALLEY
R & R
80
6
02/18/10
RANCHO VISTA AT ARGO COURT
R & R
75
3
02/22/10
CITYWIDE
POTHOLES
98
2
02/23/10
MARGARITA AT JEDEDIAH SMITH
R & R
45
MARGARITA AT AVENIDA BARCA
R & R
250
8
MARGARITA AT AVENIDA BARCA
R & R
203
5,5
PUJOL STREET
E.P. REPAIR
105
02/25/10
MARGARITA AT AVENIDA BARCA
R & R
210
CABRILLO ROAD
OVERLAY
120
PUJOL ROAD
E.P. REPAIR
25
6
TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 3.902
TOTAL TONS 64
R:NAWTA W [ W KCMPLTD W SPHALT.RPR
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2010
MINE02/01/10
CITYWIDE "HOT SPOTS"
CLEANED & CHECKED
16 CATCH BASINS
02/02/10
AREAS #2 & #5
CLEANED & CHECKED
3 CATCH BASINS
02/04/10
AREA #4
CLEANED & CHECKED
3 CATCH BASINS
02/08/10
CITYWIDE "HOT SPOTS'
CLEANED & CHECKED
21 CATCH BASINS
02/09/10
AREA #4
CLEANED & CHECKED
5 CATCH BASINS
02/10/10
AREA #1
CLEANED & CHECKED
8 CATCH BASINS
02/16/10
"HOT SPOTS'
CLEANED & CHECKED
17 CATCH BASINS
02/18/10
AREAS #1 - #5
CLEANED & CHECKED
4 CATCH BASINS
02/22/10
"HOT SPOTS'
CLEANED & CHECKED
25 CATCH BASINS
02/24/10
AREAS #1 - #5
CLEANED & CHECKED
9 CATCH BASINS
TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 111
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2010
02/01/10
.ss&rcx�"�-eba'sf�.-..:a-
MEADOWS PARKWAY AT ROYAL BIRKDALE
REMOVED
11 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TARGET CENTER
REMOVED
17 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
MARGARITA BRIDGE
REMOVED
375 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
NO. GENERAL KEARNY BRIDGE
REMOVED
48 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
LA SERENA AT CALLE PI NA COLADA
REMOVED
8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
LA SERENA AT WILLOW RUN
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
LA SERENA AT SO. GENERAL KEARNY
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
BIG SAGE AT SO. GENERAL KEARNY
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CALLE ARANDA AT SOLANA
REMOVED
15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SUNNY MEADOWS AT FERMO COURT
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TEMECULA CREEK AT CANTERFIELD
REMOVED
303 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SUNNY MEADOWS AT CAMPANULA
REMOVED
20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WALLABY AT JAGUAR
REMOVED
5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REDHAWK AT TIOGA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/02/10
PECHANGA AT MURFIELD IN CHANNEL
REMOVED
634 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CAMPANULA AT MEADOWS
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CAMPANULA AT AUGUSTA
REMOVED
30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WOLF VALLEY AT CAMINO SAN JOSE
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WOLF VALLEY AT CAMINO OLITE
REMOVED
64 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/03/10
TEMECULA CREEK AT 115 FWY BRIDGE
REMOVED
350 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WINCHESTER N/B 115 FWY ON-RAMP
REMOVED
14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WOLF CREEK AT LYON LANE
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
ANTELOPE PLACE
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD CITY LIMIT SIGN WEST END
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/04/10
RANCHO VISTA AT YNEZ
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/05/10
S/B WINCHESTER OFF -RAMP
REMOVED
140 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TEMECULA LANE AT CANTERFIELD
REMOVED
25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
R:IMAIMI'AM KCWLTMGRA=I\
R:�INTMMWKCM LTMGR HTL
-------------
02/08/10
REDHAWK AT WOLF STORE ROAD
REMOVED
41 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
EMPIRE CREEK
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/09/10
REDHAWK AT CAMINO BROZAS
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
LOMA LINDA AT PECHANGA PARKWAY
REMOVED
100 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CAMINO VERDE AT CAMINO DEL ESTE
REMOVED
580 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT CAMINO CAMPOS VERDES
REMOVED
5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
RANCHO VISTA AT MIRA LOMA
REMOVED
3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CROWNE HILL AT CASTLE COURT
REMOVED
3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REDHAWK AT WOLF STORE
REMOVED
80 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/10/10
LEENA WAY AT ABETO
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WOLF CREEK AT WOLF VALLEY
REMOVED
15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
ROCK BLUFF AT RAINBOW CREEK
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/11/10
CALLE PINA COLADA AT VIA NORTE
REMOVED.
25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/16/10
ROCKY BAR BEHIND SPORTS PARK
REMOVED
18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WOLF CREEK AT ROCKY BAR
REMOVED
86 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
DEER HOLLOW AT PEPPERCORN
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA LA COLORADA AT VIA PERALES
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
MEADOWS PARKWAY AT McCABE DRIVE
REMOVED
97 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
EMPIRE CREEK BEHIND TARGET CENTER
REMOVED
657 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/17/10
S/B 115 FWY AT OVERLAND BRIDGE
REMOVED
120 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
S/B 115 FWY AT OVERLAND BRIDGE
REMOVED
180 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
42344 VIA CONSUELO
REMOVED
12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
42340 VIA CONSUELO
REMOVED
40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SUNNY MEADOWS AT CALLE PORTOFINO
REMOVED
90 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SUNNY MEADOWS AT MEADOWS PARKWAY
REMOVED
16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CAMINO NUNEZ AT CAMINO CASANA
REMOVED
6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
MEADOWS PARKWAY AT CORTE ILLORA
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CUTCHOGUE DRIVE AT VAIL RANCH
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/18/10
PIO PICO AT CALLE REDONDELA
REMOVED
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
PIO PICO AT VIA ALLRIZO
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
R:�INTMMWKCM LTMGR HTL
MwA
¢RTf G b 7
02/18/10
LA SERENA AT SO. GENERAL KEARNY
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
BIG SAGE AT SO. GENERAL KEARNY
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
LA SERENA AT CALLE PINA COLADA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
DATE STREET BETWEEN MARGARITA & YNEZ
REMOVED
25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
YNEZ AT COUNTY CENTER
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT MARGARITA
REMOVED
36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT MARGARITA
REMOVED
240 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER CREEK
REMOVED
320 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT NICOLAS CREEK
REMOVED
200 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
BEHIND CHEVRON ON MORAGA
REMOVED
36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
EMPIRE CREEK AT TARGET
REMOVED
200 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
STONEWOOD APARTMENTS
REMOVED
101 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/19/10
AMARITA AT VIA NANZO
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
AMARITA AT VIA CEJA
REMOVED
9 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
AMARITA AT PIO PICO
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA ALLRIZO AT PIO PICO
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CALLE REDONDELA AT PIO PICO
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
AMARITA AT VIA GUERRO
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
26730 YNEZ COURT
REMOVED
152 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/22/10
FIRST STREET BRIDGE
REMOVED
17 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
RAINBOW CANYON AT BAYHILL DRIVE
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
PECHANGA AT RAINBOW
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
30725 LOMA LINDA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
30786 LOMA LINDA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
45677 PECHANGA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
32374 ROCKY BAR DRIVE
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WOLF CREEK AT CEDAR WAY
REMOVED
17 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WOLF CREEK AT ELM PLACE
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
PECHANGA AT LOMA LINDA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
AVENIDA DE MISSIONS AT CHANNEL
REMOVED
145 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/23/10
VAIL RANCH AT TOWN SQUARE
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
R1MAI TAIMWKCWLTMGa FM
R:�CWLTMGRAMTn
.L". VR4Qla
YY'�ll.t�.LtL`7,f
r'��
02/23/10
VIA CORDOBA AT CORTE CAROLINA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
PEPPERCORN AT CORTE BARELA
REMOVED
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
OVERLAND TRAIL AT HAFIZ
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SUNNY MEADOWS AT CAMPANULA
REMOVED
7 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
MIA LOMA CHANNEL
REMOVED
20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
MARGARITA AT AVENIDA SONOMA
REMOVED
3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
MARGARITA AT RAMSEY COURT
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA LA VIDA AT VIA RENATE
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA LA VIDA AT SOLANA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA LA VIDA AT VIA SEVILLA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT MARGARITA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT CAMINO CAMPOS VERDES
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT DEL REY
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
CALLE PINA COLADA AT DEL REY
REMOVED
6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
BEHIND TEMEKU CINEMAS
REMOVED
5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER
REMOVED
432 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
RUSTIC GLEN AT KNOLL RIDGE
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
DATE AT KINGWOOD
REMOVED
9 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK
REMOVED
5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
30040 DEL REY ROAD
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
DEL REY ROAD AT SOLANA
REMOVED
S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA NORTE AT CALLE PINA COLADA
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
RORIPAUGH AT STARLING
REMOVED
3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
RORIPAUGH AT SENNA
REMOVED
5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
115 FWY AT TEMECULA PARKWAY
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
MARGARITA AT RANCHO VISTA
REMOVED
6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SO. GENERAL KEARNY AT BRANFORD
REMOVED
7 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA LA VIDA AT VIA RENATE
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SOLANA AT CALLE ARANDA
REMOVED
3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/24/10
SUNNY MEADOWS AT CAPRI
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SUNNY MEADOWS AT CORBIE
REMOVED
16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SASSARI STREET AT CORBIE
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
R:�CWLTMGRAMTn
02/24/10 MODENA AT CORBIE
N.
A'
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
33320 VIA CORDOBA
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA CORDOBA AT CORTE CAROLINA
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA CORDOBA AT CORTE BRAVO
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
VIA CORDOBA AT VIA DEL CORONADO
REMOVED
1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
N/B 115 AT TEMECULA PARKWAY
REMOVED
175 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
LONG VALLEY AT YUKON
REMOVED
60 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
LONG VALLEY AT HUMBER
REMOVED
250 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/25/10
42050 MAIN STREET
REMOVED
2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
SOLANA AT MARGARITA
REMOVED
3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT CAMINO CAMPOS VERDE
REMOVED
4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
WINCHESTER ROAD BEHIND LOWE'S
REMOVED
138 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
NO. GENERAL KEARNY BRIDGE
REMOVED
651 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 7.678
TOTAL LOCATIONS 135
R:\MAPi'TAIMW CWLTD\GRAMTR
CITY OF TEMECULA
2010 GRAFFITI REMOVAL
51000
49000
47000
45000
43000
39000
37000
35000
33000
31000
29000
27000
25000
23000
21000
19000
17000
15000
13000
11000
9000
7000
5000
3000
1000
JAN FEB MAR APRIL MAY JUNE JLY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
SQ FT
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2010
DATE
REC'D
LOCATION
REQUEST
DATE WORK
COMPLETED'
11/25/09
42557 JOLENE COURT
TREE
01/27/10
01/19/10
WELTON AT CAMINO PIEDRA ROJO
ASPHALT REPAIR
02/10/10
01/22/10
44938 TEHACHAPI PASS
ASPHALT REPAIR
02/10/70
01/25/70
31767 CAMINO ROSALES -
ASPHALT REPAIR
02/10/10
01/25/10
YANKEE RUN AT BIG SAGE
CONCRETE REPAIR
02/01/10
01/29/10
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ
DEBRIS
01/29/10
NICOLAS ROAD AT NO. GENERAL KEARNY
DEBRIS
02/01/10
02/01/10
SANTIAGO AT YNEZ
ASPHALT REPAIR
02/01/10
WALLABY ROAD
GRAFFITI
02/01/10
MORAGA AT MARGARITA
GRAFFITI
02/01/10
SOLANA AT CALLE ARANDA
GRAFFITI
02/01/10
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT
DEBRIS
02/01/10
45938 - 45940 GOLD MINE DRIVE
GRAFFITI
02/01/10
GOLD MINE AT LODGE HOUSE
GRAFFITI
02/01/10
CAMPANULA AT MEADOWS
GRAFFITI
02/01/10
ROYAL CREST AT CROWNE HILL
SIGN REPAIR
02/02/10
02/02/10
ANTELOPE PLACE
GRAFFITI
02/03/10
WOLF VALLEY AT CAMINO ROSALES
GRAFFITI
02/03/10
02/03/10
CORTE BONILIO
DEBRIS
02/03/10
RANCHO VISTA AT YNEZ
GRAFFITI
02/04/10
YNEZ AT TOWN CENTER NORTH
GATE REPAIR
02/05/10
02/04/10
45965 GOLD MINE
GRAFFITI
02/04/10
02/05/10
WINCHESTER S/B OFF -RAMP
GRAFFITI
02/05/10
STONEWOOD AT MARGARITA
DEBRIS / SHOPPING CART P/U
02/05/10
44492 -44468 PENBROOK LANE
CONCRETE ISSUE
02/09/10
29830 MIRA LOMA
TREE
02/09/10
02/08/10
NICOLAS ROAD (DIRT SECTION)
LARGE HOLE IN ROAD
02/09/10
CAMINO ALAGON
GRAFFITI
02/08/10
R:\MA1NTATNNWRKC0MPLTD\S0W
DATE
REC'D
LOCATION
REQUEST
DATE WORK
COMPLETED
02/09/10
JEFFERSON AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
DEBRIS
02/10/10
32859 ADEN CIRCLE
DEBRIS
02/10/10
LEENA WAY AT LUCCA WAY
GRAFFITI
02/10/10
02/10/10
MORAGA AT SAGE CANYON
DEBRIS
02/10/10
02/11/10
WOLF CREEK BTWN. WOLF VALLEY & LION LANE
GRAFFITI
02/11/10
NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT NICOLAS ROAD
GRAFFITI
02/11/10
TETON AT LONE PINE
GRAFFITI
02/11/10
02/12/10
ANZA AT CAMINITO LORCA
GRAFFITI
02/12/10
STONEWOOD AT MARGARITA
DEBRIS (SHOPPING CART)
02/12/10
45864 JERONIMO STREET
TREE
02/16/10
ANGELES AT FOX
CONCRETE REPAIR
02/16/10
02/14/10
MARGARITAAT CALLE PINA COLADA
GRAFFITI
02/18/10
BIG SAGE AT SO. GENERAL KEARNY
GRAFFITI
02/18/10
02/16/10
NICOLASAT NO. GENERAL KEARNY
GRAFFITI
02/18/10
MCCABE AT MEADOWS PARKWAY
GRAFFITI
02/16/10
SO. GENERAL KEARNY AT LA SERENA
GRAFFITI
02/18/10
MARGARITA ROAD AT VERDES LANE
ASPHALT REPAIR
02/16/10
SUNNY MEADOWS AT MEADOWS PARKWAY
GRAFFITI
02/16/10
MCCABE AT MEADOWS
GRAFFITI
02/16/10
42340 VIA CONSUELO
GRAFFITI
02/17/10
02/17/10
CINON AT VAIL RANCH PARKWAY
SIGN REPAIR
02/17/10
41942 CAMINO CASANA
GRAFFITI
02/17/10
24060 - 42066 SWEET SHADE LANE
ASPHALT REPAIR
02/17/10
VIA CORDOBA AT LOMA LINDA
GRAFFITI
02/18/10
VIA CORDOBA AT CORTE ZORITA
GRAFFITI
02/18/10
PASEO PARALLON AT CORTE HIDALGO
GRAFFITI
02/17/10
CAMINO GUARDA AT CAMINO PALENCIA
GRAFFITI
02/17/10
MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS AT CHANDLER DRIVE
DEBRIS
02/19/10
VIA VASQUEZ AT CAMINO OSUNA
GRAFFITI
02/19/10
VIA VASQUEZ AT CAMINO DE LA TORRE
GRAFFITI
02/19/10
02/18/10
AMARITAAT VIA CEJA
GRAFFITI
02/19/10
REDHAW K AT PEPPERCORN
GRAFFITI
02/19/10
41586 YANKEE RUN COURT
GRAFFITI
02/19/10
R:\MAlNTAfNkWRKC0MPLrDNS0RS\
DATE
REC'D
LOCATION
REQUEST
DATE WORK
COMPLETED
02/18/10
VIA VASQUEZ AT CORTE CAMARA
GRAFFITI
02/18/10
26730 YNEZ COURT
GRAFFITI
02/19/10
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HOPE WAY
GRAFFITI
02/18/10
WOLF CREEK DRIVE AT ELM
GRAFFITI
02/22/10
02/19/10
MIRA LOMA DRIVE AT AVENIDA DE CALAZADA
SIGN REPAIR
02/19/10
REDHAWK PARKWAY AT VIA ALMAZAN
SIGN REPAIR
02/19/10
02/22/10
MARGARITA AT AVENIDA SONOMA
GRAFFITI
02/22/10
MARGARITA AT AVENIDA SONOMA
GRAFFITI
02/22/10
MEADOWVIEW AT AVENIDA VERDE
GRAFFITI
02/22/10
MARGARITA AT ENTRANCE TO SYCAMORE APARTMENTS
GRAFFITI
02/22/10
NICOLAS ROAD AT CALLE GIRASOL
ROAD ISSUES
02/22/10
RORIPAUGH ROAD AT SENNA COURT
GRAFFITI
02/22/10
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER
GRAFFITI
02/22/10
DEL REY AT AVENIDA VERDE
GRAFFITI
02/22/10
MORAGA BETWEEN CHURCH AND SCHOOL
DEBRIS
02/22/10
02/23/10
PUJOL STREET
DEBRIS
02/24/10
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HOPE WAY
DEBRIS (SHOPPING CARTS)
02/23/10
33250 CAMINO RUBANO
GRAFFITI
02/23/10
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT TEMECULA PARKWAY
POTHOLE
02/23/10
43460 RIDGE PARK DRIVE
BROKEN IRRIGATION
02/23/10
02/24/10
MEADOWVIEW AREA
CHANNELS
02/24/10
VIA CORDOBA AT VIA DEL CORONADO
GRAFFITI
02/24/10
S/B 115 AT TEMECULA PARKWAY
GRAFFITI
02/24/10
N/B BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT TEMECULA PARKWAY
POTHOLE
02/24/10
SUNNYMEADOWS AT CORBIE STREET
GRAFFITI
02/24/10
30219 VILLA ALTURAS DRIVE
TREE
02/26/10
02/25/10
VAIL RANCH AT OVERLAND
GRAFFITI
02/25/10
02/26/10
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MARGARITA
HAZMAT
02/26/10
AVENIDA DE MISSIONS (BEHIND CHURCH)
GRAFFITI
02/26/10
TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 90
R:WAINTAI N\WR KCOMPLTD\ ORS\
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SIGNS
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2010
R9MAINTAIM W KCMPLTD\SIGNS\
LOCATION.
WORK,C011.PLETED
ANNERS
VOLOMA
INSTALL
110 BANNERS & HARDWARE
R RD. & RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.
REPAIR
42 BANNERS
AT REDWOOD
NEW INSTALL
1 R2-40; 2 R2-35; 2 RW -30
WINCHESTER AT PROMENADE
REPLACED
R2-40
02/04/10
NICOLAS ROAD
REPLACED
27 CARSONITES
02/08/10
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ
REPAIR
"WELCOME HOME" SIGNS
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT 115 FWY
REPAIR
"WELCOME HOME" SIGNS
NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT CAMINO VERDES
REPAIR
W9-2
OAK PARK AT SAMILIN
REPLACED
SNS
OAK PARK AT SAMILIN
REPAIR
R3 -7R
02/09/10
ROYAL CREST ATCROWNEHILL
NEW INSTALL
W3-1
ROYAL CREST ATCROWNEHILL
REPLACED
R1-1
ROYAL CREST ATCROWNEHILL
REPAIR
SNS &W1-6
TEMECULA PARKWAY AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE
REPAIR
R2-55
REDHAW K AT OVERLAND TRAIL
REPAIR
2 DELINEATORS
PECHANGA AT CUPENO
NEW INSTALL
R2-40
PECHANGA AT CASINO
NEW INSTALL
R2-40
PECHANGA AT PECHANGA DRIVE
REPAIR
R8-7
02/10/10
WOLF CREEK DRIVE
NEW INSTALL
8 R2-30
OLD TOWN FRONT AT MORENO
REPLACED
R3-7
PAUBA RD. BTWN. VIA DEL MONTE & BUTTERFIELD
NEW INSTALL
2 R2-40
02/11/10
PAUBA AT CROWNE HILL
NEW INSTALL
2 R2-40
02/12/10
TEMECULA PARKWAY AT MARGARITA
REPLACED
R26 -COMBO
AT MARGARITA
REPLACED
R-26
EWINCHESTER
WINCHESTER AT RORIPAUGH
REPLACED
R-26
SUNNY MEADOWS AT MEADOWS PARKWAY
REPAIR
R4-7
R9MAINTAIM W KCMPLTD\SIGNS\
DATE
LOCATION
WORK;COMPLETED
02/16/10
McCABE AT VIA MEJA
REPAIR
R2-35
YNEZ AT EQUITY
REPAIR
R4-1 & K MARKER
VIA CORDOBA AT LOMA LINDA
REPAIR
R1-1
02/17/10
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ
REPAIR
CONSTRUCTION SIGN
VAIL RANCH AT.CUTCHOGUE DRIVE
REPAIR
R1-1
VAIL RANCH AT CINON DRIVE
REPAIR
R1-1
02/22/10
RAINBOW CANYON AT BAY HILL
REPAIR
R1-1
WOLF CREEK AT ANTELOPE
REPAIR
C -PACKAGE
VIA DEL CORONADO AT VIA CORDOBA
REPAIR
W1-1 (L)
VIA DEL CORONADO AT LOMA LINDA
REPAIR
C PACKAGE
DATE AT KINGWOOD
REPLACED
(2) R4-7
02/23/10
WELTON AT CAMINO PIEDRA ROJO
REPLACED
R1-7
VIA LA VIDA AT SOLANA WAY
NEW INSTALL
(2) R2-30
02/25/10
YNEZ AT RANCHO VISTA
REPAIR
192-45
VIA LA VIDA AT VIA RENATE
NEW INSTALL
(2) R2-30
VAIL RANCH AT OVERLAND TRAIL
REPLACED
Wt -7
PAUBA AT MARGARITA
REPLACED
W3-3
02/26/10
TEMECULA PARKWAY AT CAMINO DEL SOL
REPAIR
W3-3
MARGARITA AT SONOMA
REPLACED
R26
DATE AT YNEZ
REPAIR
R4-7
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 41
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 23
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 26
BANNER REPAIRS 152
R:\MAINTAI N\ W KCMPLTmSIGNS\
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
STENCILS / STRIPING
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2010
R:WA1NTAIM WRKCOMPLTD\STRIPING
LOCATION
WORK COMPLETED
LA PARKWAY BTWN. PECHANGA & MARGARITA
REPAINT
24 LEGENDS
p
ECULA PARKWAY AT PECHANGA
fRYDER
REPAINT
12 LEGENDS
NDA E/O PECHANGA PARKWAY
NEW INSTALL
2 LEGENDS
WAY AT ENTERPRISE
REPAINT
2 LEGENDS
HAZEL AT WOLF CREEK DRIVE
NEW INSTALL
2 LEGENDS
RANCHO VISTA AT LOMA PORTOLA DRIVE
REPAINTED
11 LEGENDS
02/11/10
RANCHO CALIFORNIA / EAST & WEST BOUND
REPAINTED
29 BULL NOSES
PECHANGA PARKWAY AT TEMECULA PARKWAY
REPAINTED
2 BULL NOSES
MARGARITA AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
REPAINTED
6 LEGENDS
MEADOWS PARKWAY AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
REPAINTED
2 LEGENDS
02/16/10
PECHANGA PARKWAY
NEW INSTALL
6 LEGENDS
02/17/10
PECHANGA PARKWAY
NEW INSTALL
6 LEGENDS
02/18/10
PECHANGA PARKWAY
NEW INSTALL
7 LEGENDS
02/19/10
PECHANGA PARKWAY
NEW INSTALL
6 LEGENDS
42700 VIA DEL CAMPO
NEW INSTALL
2 LEGENDS
02/23/10
PAUBA AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD
NEW INSTALL
2 LEGENDS
VIA LA VIDA AT SOLANA
NEW INSTALL
4 LEGENDS
02/25/10
3RD AT MERCEDES
NEW INSTALL
2 LEGENDS
TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 127
NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 0
R:WA1NTAIM WRKCOMPLTD\STRIPING
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2010
DATE
LOCATION '
WORK COMPLETED
02/11/10
RANCHO VISTA AT MIRA LOMA
TRIMMED
2 R.O.W. TREES
02/18/10
MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD
TRIMMED
1 R.O.W. TREES
02/22/10
30889 CALLE PINA COLADA
TRIMMED
1 R.O.W. TREES
02/26/10
TEMECULA PARKWAY AT CAMINO DEL SOL
TRIMMED
1 R.O.W. TREES
TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 5
14FI-11:111r_l0I►yi1:1:101TANI►yiINIL1119:1:1110]N161K
Monthly Activity Report
February/ March 2010
Prepared by: Amer Attar
Submitted by: Greg Butler
Date: 3/23/2010
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station
The majority of work was completed by April of 2006. The remaining work will be completed when the
mainline utilities are installed, which the City is undertaking - estimated start in March of 2010. A fire
engine/truck venting system (requested/added on 2/06) will be installed when the Contractor re-
mobilizes, this cost is also included in the approved change order total.
City Property at Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway (Northwest RDA Property) - Rough Grading
This project provided for the rough grading of the vacant City property at Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway.
All work was completed on March 28, 2007. Site restoration, including hydroseeding, was completed in
December of 2008. A notice of completion was approved by the City Council at the 1/13/09 meeting.
Ongoing maintenance expenses will be incurred for NPDES measures until such time the property is
developed. Minor BMP improvements were completed in late November of 2009.
Old Town Infrastructure Project -Town Square and Mercedes & Main Street
This project involves construction of the Town Square and street improvements on Mercedes & Main
Streets. The project was awarded on March 18, 2008. Various specialty items and added work
extended the completion date through Spring of 2010. In addition final paving in this contract will be
defferred to the completion of the Civic Center.
Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements from Temecula Parkway to City Limits @
Pechanga Rd.
This project widens Pechanga Pkwy to its ultimate width from Temecula Pkwy to Pechanga Rd. The
contractor has essentially completed the improvements including the "dual right turn lanes" work. The
remaining work consists of punch list items to include ridability and EMWD manhole work. The ridability
work is scheduled to start this week, the EMWD work is scheduled to begin the week of March 28th.
There is a claim against AAA and the City from EMWD regarding damages to their facilities that the AAA
has allegedly caused. We are working with AAA to address this claim. The project is substantially
complete, as of August 2009.
Old Town Infrastructure Projects
- Parking Structure & Office/Retail Frontage
This project includes the site grading and retaining walls for the Civic Center & the Parking Structure site
as well as construction of a parking structure, including office frontage shell space. Work is ongoing on
exterior facade, landscaping and hardscapes. The structure was opened to the public the first week of
March 2010.
Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal & Desiltation Pond
This project includes restoring the Best Management Practices (BMP) of the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP), the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and the requirements of
RWQCB by desilting the basin located near the Sports Park. 401 Certification, Streambed Alteration
Agreement, and Nationwide Permits have been acquired. Bids were opened on 08/26/08 and awarded
on 12/08/09. Notice to Proceed effective 01/04/10. Construction has begun. Vegetation removal and
habitat creation area grading is complete
Old Town Civic Center
This project will construct the Old Town Civic Center. City Council awarded the contract to Edge
Development, Inc. on 09/09/08. Edge began work on 4/8/09. Work is ongoing on steel stud framing,
and rough in of mechanical, electrical and plumbing.
Redhawk Park Improvements
This project will add amenities, which include ADA accessible parking, a restroom, a half -court
basketball court, and permanent dog park at Redhawk Community Park. As part of this project, a
seatwall will be installed at Sunset Park. The Notice To Proceed was issued 12/21/09. Construction
activities began in January 2010. Completion is anticipated in June 2010.
De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project (from Jedediah Smith to Margarita)
This project involves rehabilitating De Portola Rd pavement from Jedediah Smith to Margarita Rd. This
is a federally funded project. Construction began the week of 3/16/09, all contract and change order work
is complete as of 2/19/10. Notice of Completion to go to Council at 3/23/10 meeting.
Pavement Rehabilitation Rancho California Road (Ynez to East City Limit) - STPL Project
This project will rehabilitate Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to the City limits on the east.
Construction began on June 3, 2009. The contractor is working on punchlist items.
Winchester Road / State Route 79 North - North Corridor Beautification
This federally funded project will design and construct landscaping and irrigation enhancements to the
existing raised medians along Winchester Road between Ynez Road and the easterly City limits. The
Notice to Proceed was issued to the Contractor for a March 8, 2010 start date.
Traffic Signal Interconnect Equipment Installation
This project will install traffic signal interconnect equipment on Margarita Road, from Rancho California
Road to Pio Pico Road. Project is completed and waiting on final invoice to complete CCO#2 & Notice of
Completion.
1:1Zea]*4&1s3ml1LI[r1_1sin ;1:4961;1oil mel :a --]Ism
Temecula Community Center Expansion - Phase 2, Renovation of Historical Buildings
Phase 2 of this project will renovate the Escallier House and Barn. Bids were opened on March 4, 2010.
A recommendation to award a contract will go before the City Council at the 03/23/10 meeting.
Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009-2010
This project will slurry seal local streets within the Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campus Verdes and Nicholas
Valley Areas. Proposition 1 B funds will be used to fund this project. Projects bid opening was March 2,
2010. This matter will go before the City Council at the 03/23/10 meeting.
:111110]ME" &IIL1IQ*1NL1I
Re -Stripe Route 79 South to 8 lanes from Pechanga Parkway to 1-15
This project will provide four lanes in each direction on Temecula Parkway (formerly State Route 79
South) from 1-15 to Pechanga Parkway. The City is working to meet Caltrans requirements to do the
striping.
Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements - Environmental Mitigation
This project includes construction of new wetlands for the Wolf Valley Creek Channel Improvements -
Stage I. The wetlands will be created through construction of new landscape/irrigation systems. The site
is located along the north bank of Temecula Creek (within flood-plain/way areas). The environmental
regulatory agencies have approved this new mitigation area. Mylars are ready for signature. Offers for
purchase of the properties were made and City Council adopted a Resolution of Necessity to acquire the
property on 11/25/08. The proposed improvements can't be implemented until the City obtains
possession of the property. The California Department of Fish & Game (DFG) will have to sign off on this
acquisition since they have jurisdiction over land the City will use for access. The DFG just sent the City
a response with significant demands. Further discussions and a site visit are necessary. A site visit has
been scheduled for 03/16/10.
Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension from Commerce Center to Diaz Rd
The project includes the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center Drive to Diaz Road with a
bridge over Murrieta Creek. Coordination with RCFC & WCD, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
state environmental regulatory agencies is required. The City just received 100% plans. There are
comments and the consultant will have to resubmit.
Main Street Bridge Over Murrieta Creek (Replacement)
This project will replace the existing Main Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek. Design consultant Simon
Wong Engineering (SWE) and the City are continuing to pursue environmental permitting and
coordination issues associated with pursuing the bridge replacement as a project separate from the
Army Corps of Engineer's Murrieta Creek Improvement project. An inter -agency meeting was held on
9/16/09 to determine mitigation requirements for this project. The outcome of this meeting was that the
City will be required to mitigate for temporary vegetation loss incurred during construction, all other
mitigation will be included in the USACOE overall Murrieta Creek flood control project. A mitigation plan
has been prepared, resubmittal of environmental technical reports to Caltrans to take place shortly.
Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Over Santa Gertrudis Creek
This project includes the construction of an approx. 150' long ped/bike bridge over Santa Gertrudis
Creek near Chaparral H.S. This is a federally funded project, which will involve a NEPA document.
Caltrans has completed two reviews of environmental documents to date, environmental technical
reports resubmitted to Caltrans for third and final review on 3/11/10.
Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek
This project involves the design, environmental clearance, and construction of a new bridge over
Murrieta Creek at the westerly terminus of Western Bypass and an extension of Pujol Street to the new
structure. Once constructed, this will serve as the southerly connection of the Western Bypass Corridor.
Design is underway. Geotechnical investigations have been initiated and 90% Plans and Specs are
being reviewed. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted. Applications to the various
environmental agencies have been submitted.
Temecula Park and Ride (79 South)
This project will design and construct a park and ride facility on Temecula Parkway (formerly 79 South)
at La Paz. The 70% design drawings were returned to AAE for revision and resubmittal. City and
consultant are discussing some of the comments. The consultant is working to finalize the plans. 90%
submittal is expected after the lighting issue is resolved and the consultant make the necessary
changes.
Pechanga Pkwy -Dual Right Turn Lanes from
Temecula Parkway (SR 79S)
This project included the design and construction of 2 right -turn lanes on eastbound Temecula Pkwy to
southbound Pechanga Pkwy. The Pechanga Pkwy Ph II Street Improvements' contractor has completed
this work, as a change order to their contract.
French Valley Parkway/ Interstate 15 Over -Crossing and Interchange Improvements - Phase 1
(PS&E)
A southbound off -Ramp to Jefferson, an auxiliary lane, and widening the bridge over Santa Gertrudis
Creek at the Winchester southbound off -ramp are the components of Phase 1. City continued the design
work. Status is as follows:
> PS&E - City is preparing 95% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate.
> Right of Way - Establishing limits of dedication.
> Declaration of Units - Caltrans Approved Metric Exception for this phase.
> Utilities - Pothole of existing utilities within APE are complete.
Old Town Gymnasium
This projects involves the design of the approximately 9,000 square foot gymnasium adjacent the Boys &
Girls Club on Pujol Street. The land is to be utilized as staging area for the Murrieta Creek
Improvements project and it will need to be acquired from Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) for
the current design. A time line was established by TCSD for the design and environmental work. The
City Council subcommittee gave staff the go ahead to proceed with the construction drawings on 01-26-
2010. TCSD is scheduling this item for Commission and Council approval of the Master Plan and
authorization to move forward with developing the construction drawings.
Long Canyon Detention Basin - Access Road
Plans and specifications are 90% complete. City is seeking FEMA funds to remove excess silt deposited
within the basin before constructing the access road. Project is on hold until FEMA determination is
finalized.
Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect
The project will provide a Class I bicycle trail that connects the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek
Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail at Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Multi -Purpose Trail at Diaz Road. The City
Council approved an agreement with Hall & Foreman at the 11/25/08 meeting. The kick off meeting was
held on 01/08/09. The alignment study has been completed. Extension of time for the Bicycle
Transportation Account funds was approved on 05/01/09. The consultant has submitted 70% plans,
specifications and estimate.
Nicolas Valley - Assessment District (Liefer Road)
This project will study assessment district feasibility and formation, including completing the street and
minor storm drain improvements on the unimproved portions of certain streets within Nicolas Valley
(Liefer Road) area. The City Council approved an agreement for the street improvement design with
David Evans and Associates at the 10/28/08 City Council Meeting. The kick off meeting for the design of
the street improvements was held on 12/17/08. Consultant is preparing 90% plans, specifications and
estimate.
Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements - Phase I
Phase I includes the design & construction of Butterfield Stage Road (BSR) from Murrieta Hot Springs
Road (MHSR) to Calle Chapos, a portion of MHSR, Calle Chapos, South Loop Rd and making the Fire
Station functional. Liens and settlements have been resolved. On 11/24/09, David Evans and
Associates' (DEA) was awarded a contract to complete the design. 100% plans were submitted on
3/01/10, the City is currently reviewing them. On 1/12/10 Hirsh & Associates, Inc. was awarded a
contract to complete the landscape design. Both consultants are working on completing the designs.
Staff is working on the Bid Package. The City Attorney is to review the impacts associated with
Paradigm's involvement in regards to the FDIC's new involvement.
Traffic Signal Installation - Citywide
This project will install traffic signals at two intersections, Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road and Rancho
California Road at Yukon Road. Notice To Proceed was issued 12/21/09 for design activities.
Completion of Plans and Specifications is anticipated in June 2010. Consultant has submitted 70%
plans.
Road and Storm Drain Repair at Rancho California Road
Storm drain pipes have been determined to be essentially sound. The approach from this point will take
the form of rust removal and application of a protective coating to the pipe interior to extend the life of the
pipe, no major repair is anticipated. Authorization to bid was obtained from Council at the 3/9/10
meeting, bid advertisement to begin shortly.
Citywide Storm Drain Improvements - Rancho California Rd at Vincent Moraga Dr
Authorization to bid was received from City Council at the January 26, 2010 City Council Meeting, bid
advertisement is to begin shortly.
Road Reconstruction at Jedediah Smith Road
Staff is coordinating with a consultant to develop a bid package based on ARAM (Asphalt Rubber
Aggregate Membrane) technology. Authorization to bid was obtained from City Council at the 3/9/10
meeting, bid advertisement to begin shortly.
1-15 / SR -79S Ultimate Interchange
The City's consultant is preparing 30% PS&E package for Caltrans review in March 2010.
Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009-2010
This Project is the annual slurry seal project that will slurry seal local streets within the City.
Citywide Concrete Repairs FY 2009-2010
This project will consist of various concrete repair throughout the City. Specifications are complete and
the tentative schedule is to solicit bids is mid April.
nell]*@1&11LlII:I ;a Wil LlILlI ILl [elm r_W0
French Valley Parkway/ Interstate 15 Over -Crossing and Interchange Improvements (PA & ED)
Project Report - Approved January 2010.
Environmental Document -Approved January 2010.
New Connection Report - Under FHWA review.
Freeway Agreements - Under Caltrans review.
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PRIORITY
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
NO
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
PAID ($)
bid date)
PROJECTS UNDER CON RUCTION
Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station
The majority of work was completed by April of 2006. The remaining work will be
Contractor: Tovey Shultz Construction, Inc.
completed when the mainline utilities are installed, which the City is undertaking -
PW03-01
I
ContractAmount: $3,298,000
David McBride
97%(9110)
93%
estimated start in March of 2010. A fire engine/truck venting system (requested/added on
Approved Change Orders: $212,768.24
2/06) will be installed when the Contractor re -mobilizes, this cost is also included in the
Account No. 210-165-741
approved change order total.
City Property at Diaz Road and Dandy Parkway
This project provided for the rough grading of the vacant City property at Diaz Road and
(Northwest RDA Property) - Rough Grading
Dandy Parkway. Al work was completed on March 28, 2007. Site restoration, including
Contractor: Skanska
hydroseeding, was completed in December of 2008. A notice of completion was approved
PW06-03
I
Final Contract Cost $5,948,799.71
David McBride
Complete
100%
by the City Council at the 1/13/09 meeting. Ongoing maintenance expenses will be
incurred for NPDES measures until such time the property is developed. Minor BMP
improvements were completed in late November of 2009.
Old Town Infrastructure Project -Town Square and
This project involves construction of the Town Square and street improvements on
Mercedes & Main Street
Mercedes & Main Streets. The project was awarded on March 18, 2008. Various
Contractor: LH Engineering Contract Amt:
specialty items and added work extended the completion date through Spring of 2010. In
PWO6-07
7
$3,458,495.00
ha
Approveedd Change Orders) $ 265,133.48
David McBride99%
(4110)
97%
addition final paving in this contract will be defferred to the completion of the Civic Center.
(1C & 1
Account Nos.:
210-165-636
210-165-643
Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements
This project widens Pechanga Pkwy to its ultimate width from Temecula Pkwy to
from Temecula Parkway to City Limits @ Pechanga
Pechanga Rd. The contractor has essentially completed the improvements including the
Rd.
Mayne De La
"dual right turn lanes" work. The remaining work consists of punch list items to include
PW99-11
Contractor: All American Asphalt (AAA)
Tome/Amer
100%
95%
EMWD manhole work. This work is scheduled to begin the week of March 28th. There is a
(Ph II)
Contract Amount: $8,131,964.98
Attar
claim against AAA and the City from EMWD regarding damages to their facilities that the
Account No. 210-165-668-58XX
AAA has allegedly caused. We are working with AAA to address this claim. The project is
substantially complete, as of August 2009.
Old Town Infrastructure Projects
This project includes the site grading and retaining walls for the Civic Center & the Parking
- Parking Structure & Office/Retail Frontage
Structure site as well as construction of a parking structure, including office frontage shell
PW06-07
David
space. Work is ongoing on exterior facade, landscaping and hardscapes. The structure
(1 D)
Contractor: PCL Construction
Contract r PCL: $1 struc ion
McBride/ Bill
99%(3110)
97%
was opened to the public the first week of March 2010.
Approved Change Orders: $138,809.91)
McAteer
Account No. 210-165-644
Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal &
This project includes restoring the Best Management Practices (BMP) of the Stormwater
Desiltation Pond
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and
Contractor: Sean Malek
William
the requirements of RWQCB by desilting the basin located near the Sports Park. 401
PW05-13
I
Engineering Contract Amount: $182,900
Becerra/ Avlin
87%
25%
Certification, Streambed Alteration Agreement, and Nationwide Permits have been
Account No. 210-190-187-58XX
Odviar
acquired. Bids were opened on 08/26/08 and awarded on 12/08/09. Notice to Proceed
effective 01/04/10. Construction has begun. Vegetation removal and habitat creation area
grading is complete
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
NO
PRIORITY
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
PAID ($)
bid date)
Old Town Civic Center
This project will construct the Old Town Civic Center. City Council awarded the contract to
Edge Development, Inc. on 09/09/08. Edge began work on 4/8/09. Work is ongoing on
PW06-07
Contractor: Edge Development
Bill McAteer/
58%
exterior sheathing, and rough in of mechanical, electrical and plumbing.
Ph2
Contract Amount: $31,555,500
David McBride
(10104110)
54
Approved Change Orders: $88,093
Account No. 210-165-751-58XX
Redhawk Park Improvements
This project will add amenities, which include ADA accessible parking, a restroom, a half -
Contractor: IAC Engineering, Inc.
Kendra
court basketball court, and permanent dog park at Redhawk Community Park. As part of
PWO6-O6
Contract Amount: $787,094.92
Hannah-
20%(0612010)
0%
this project, a seatwall will be installed at Sunset Park. The Notice To Proceed was
Account No. 210-190-144-58XX
Meistrell1
Avlin Odviar
issued 12/21/09. Construction activities began in January 2010. Completion is
anticipated in June 2010.
De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project
This project involves rehabilitating De Portola Rd pavement from Jedediah Smith to
(from Jedediah Smith to Margarita)
Margarita Rd. This is a federally funded project. Construction began the week of 3/16/09;
Contractor: Hardy & Harper, Inc.
Jon Salazar/
all contract and change order work is complete as of 2/19/10. Notice of Completion to go
PW06-10
I
Contract Amount: $1,161,000
Amer Attar
124%
92%
to Council at 3/23/10 meeting.
Approved Change Orders (1-7): $251,660.95
Account No. 210-165-656-58XX
Pavement Rehabilitation Rancho California Road
This project will rehabilitate Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to the City limits on
(Ynez to East City Limit) - STPL Project
Kendra
the east. Construction began on June 3, 2009. The contractor is working on punchlist
PW06-14
I
Contractor: All American Asphalt
Hannah-
99%(0212010)
78%
items.
Contract Amt: $3,666,004.25
Meistrell 1
Avlin Odviar
Account No. 210-165-657
Winchester Road / State Route 79 North - North
This federally funded project will design and construct landscaping and irrigation
Corridor Beautification
enhancements to the existing raised medians along Winchester Road between Ynez
PW06-15
I
Contractor: Belaire-West Landscape, Inc.
Chris Whiter
5%
0%
Road and the easterly City limits. The Notice to Proceed was issued to the Contractor for
ContractAmount: $920,027.00
Amer Attar
a March 8, 2010 start date.
Account No. 210-165-638
Traffic Signal Interconnect Equipment Installation
Chris
This project will install traffic signal interconnect equipment on Margarita Road, from
PW04-05
I
Contractor: High -Light Electric, Inc.
White/Maym
100% (2/10)
34%
Rancho California Road to Pio Pico Road. Project is completed and waiting on final
Contract Amount: $211,878.00
De La Torre
invoice to complete CCO#2 & Notice of Completion.
Account No. 210-165-712-58xx
PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS
Temecula Community Center Expansion - Phase 2,
Phase 2 of this project will renovate the Escallier House and Barn. Bids were opened on
Renovation of Historical Buildings
William
March 4, 2010. A recommendation to award a contract will go before the City Council at
PW06-05
III
Contractor:
Becerra/ David
100%
100%
the 03/23/10 meeting.
Contract Amount:
McBride
Account No. 210-190-197
Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009-2010
This project will slurry seal local streets within the Roripaugh Hills Estates, Campus
Contractor:
Chris
Verdes and Nicholas Valley Areas. Proposition 1 B funds will be used to fund this project.
PW 09-06
1
Contract Amount
WhitelMaym
0%
0%
Projects bid opening was March 2, 2010. This matter will go before the City Council at the
Account Number: 210-165-512-58xx
De La Torre
03/23/10 meeting.
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PRIORITY
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
NO
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
PAID ($)
bid date)
PROJECTS BEING DESIGNED BY CONSULTANTS
Re -Stripe Route 79 South to 8lanes from Pechanga
This project will provide four lanes in each direction on Temecula Parkway (formerly State
Parkway to I-15
Kendra
Route 79 South) from 1-15 to Pechanga Parkway. The City is working to meet Caltrans
PW07-08
I
Consultant: JMD
Hannah-
60% (0212010)
50%
requirements to do the striping.
Amount: $29,210.00
Mn Oci l l
Avlin tiviar
Account No. 210-165-676-58XX
Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements-
This project includes construction of new wetlands for the Wolf Valley Creek Channel
Environmental Mitigation
Improvements -Stage 1. The wetlands will be created through construction of new
Iandscapelrrigation systems. The site is located along the north bank of Temecula Creek
Consultants: Community Works Design
(within flood-plain/way areas). The environmental regulatory agencies have approved this
PW99-
Contract Amount: $29,840
new mitigation area. Mylars are ready for signature. Offers for purchase of the properties
1
Mayne De La
98%
98%
were made and City Council adopted a Resolution of Necessity to acquire the property on
11 EM
Account No. 210-165-668-58XX
Torre
11/25/08. The proposed improvements can't be implemented until the City obtains
possession of the property. The California Department of Fish & Game (DFG) will have to
sign off on this acquisition since they have jurisdiction over land the City will use for
access. The DFG just sent the City a response with significant demands. Further
discussions and a site visit are necessary. A site visit has been scheduled for 03/16/10.
Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension
The project includes the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center Drive to Diaz
from Commerce Center to Diaz Rd
Road with a bridge over Murrieta Creek. Coordination with RCFC & WCD, U.S. Army
PW00-26
I
Chris White 1
97%
97%
Corps of Engineers and the state environmental regulatory agencies is required. The City
Consultant: Project Design Consultants
Contract Amount: $466,940
Amer Attar
just received 100% plans. There are comments and the consultant will have to resubmit.
Account No. 210-165-602-58XX
Main Street Bridge Over Murrieta Creek
This project will replace the existing Main Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek. Design
(Replacement)
consultant Simon Wong Engineering (SWE) and the City are continuing to pursue
Consultant: Simon Wong Engineering
environmental permitting and coordination issues associated with pursuing the bridge
Contract amount: $Contr 9
replacement as a project separate from the Army Corps of Engineer's Murrieta Creek
Amendment No. 1: Contract term extension
Amendment No 2: Contract term extension
Jon Salazar)
93%(Phases I
Improvement project. meeting was held on 9/16/09 to determine
PW03-05
Amendment No. 3: $322,305
Amer Attar
97% (2110)
& Iq - 97%
(Phase 3)
s for
mitigation requirements for this project. The Outcome Of this meeting was that the City will
Amendment No. 4: $24,063 (RCWD waterline)
be required to mitigate for temporary vegetation loss incurred during construction; all other
mitigation will be included in the USACOE overall Murrieta Creek flood control project. A
Account No. 210-165-743-58XX
mitigation plan has been prepared; resubmittal of environmental technical reports to
Caltrans to take place shortly.
Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Over Santa Gertrudis
This project includes the construction of an approx. 150' long ped/bike bridge over Santa
Creek
Gertrudis Creek near Chaparral H.S. This is a federally funded project, which will involve a
PW05-11
Consultant: Nolte Associates
Jon Salazar/
99 (2110)
91%
NEPA document. Caltrans has completed two reviews of environmental documents to
ContractAmount: $132,807
Amer Attar
date; environmental technical reports resubmitted to Caltrans for third and final review on
Account No. 210-165-738-58XX
3/11/10.
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PRIORITY
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
NO
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
PAID ($)
bid date)
Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek
This project involves the design, environmental clearance, and construction of a new
Consultant: TYLIN International
bridge over Murrieta Creek at the westerly terminus of Western Bypass and an extension
Contract Amt: $378,776.20
William
of Pujol Street to the new structure. Once constructed, this will serve as the southerly
PW06-04
I
Amendment 2Amt: $244,824.80
Becerral Avlin
80%
88%
connection of the Western Bypass Corridor. Design is underway. Geotechnical
Account No. 210-165-660-58XX
Odviar
investigations have been initiated and 90% Plans and Specs are being reviewed. The
Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted. Applications to the various environmental
agencies have been submitted.
Temecula Park and Ride (79 South)
This project will design and construct a park and ride facility on Temecula Parkway
(formerly 79 South) at La Paz. The 70% design drawings were returned to AAE for
revision and resubmittal. City and consultant discussing some of the comments. The
PW06-09
Design Development AAE, Inc.
Contract amount $109,085
Amer Attar
75%
75%
are
consultant is working to finalize the plans. 90% submittal is expected after the lighting
Amendment #1 $20,500
issue is resolved and the consultant make the necessary changes.
Account No. 210-165-747-58XX
Pechanga Pkwy -Dual Right Turn Lanes from
This project included the design and construction of 2 right -turn lanes on eastbound
Temecula Parkway (SR 79S)
Temecula Pkwy to southbound Pechanga Pkwy. The contractor for the Pechanga Pkwy
PW06-11
I
Consultant: Cozad & Fox
Mayne De La
100%
98%
Ph 11 Street Improvements has completed this work, as a change order to their contract.
Contract Amount: $29,010
Tome
Account No. 210-165-637-58XX
French Valley Parkway / Interstate 15 Over -Crossing
A southbound off -Ramp to Jefferson, an auxiliary lane, and widening the bridge over
and Interchange Improvements- Phase 1 (PS&E)
Santa Gertrudis Creek at the Winchester southbound off -ramp are the components of
Consultant: Moffatt & Nichol
Phase 1. City continued the design work. Status is as follows:
Amend. No. 1: $ 507,881.00
Amend. No. 4: $ 632,058.00
William
> PS&E - City is preparing 95% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate.
PW07-04
Amend. No. 8: $1,087,300.00
Becerrat
60%(05110)
61%
> Right of Way Establishing limits of dedication.
Notes:
Avm Odviarl
> Declaration of Units - Caltrans Approved Metric Exception for this ph ase.
pp p p
> Amend. Nos. 1, 4, & e amend original agreement
Amer Attar
> Utilities -Pothole of existing utilities within APE are complete.
under PW02-11.
> Amendment amounts represent portion
appropriated for PW07-04.
Old Town Gymnasium
This projects involves the design of the approximately 9,000 square foot gymnasium
Consultant: WLC Architects
adjacent the Boys & Girls Club on Pujol Street. The land is to be utilized as staging area
Contract Amount: $307,390.00
for the Murrieta Creek Improvements project and it will need to be acquired from Riverside
PW07-
11
Account No. 210-190-186
Amer Attar
10%(17109)
5%
County Flood Control (RCFC) for the current design. A time line was established by
05CSD
TCSD for the design and environmental work. The City Council subcommittee gave staff
the go ahead to proceed with the construction drawings on 01-26-2010. TCSD is
scheduling this item for Commission and Council approval of the Master Plan and
authorization to move forward with developing the construction drawings.
Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail
The project will provide a Class I bicycle trail that connects the existing Santa Gertrudis
Extension and Interconnect
Kendra
Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail at Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Multi -Purpose Trail at
Alignment Study, Design & Environmental Clearance
Hannah-
Diaz Road. The City Council approved an agreement with Hall & Foreman at the 11/25/08
PW08-04
II
Consultant: Hall & Foreman, Inc.
Meistrell1
70% (0812010)
40%
meeting. The kick off meeting was held on 01/08/09. The alignment study has been
Contract Amount: $246,865.00
Aylin Odviar
completed. Extension of time for the Bicycle Transportation Account funds was approved
Account No. 210-165-739-58XX
on 05/01/09. The consultant has submitted 70% plans, specifications and estimate.
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PRIORITY
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
NO
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
PAID ($)
bid date)
Nicolas Valley- Assessment District (Liefer Road)
This project will study assessment district feasibility and formation, including completing
Consultant: David Evans &Associates (DEA)
Kendra
the street and minor storm drain improvements on the unimproved portions of certain
Contract Amount: $120,900.00
Hannah-
streets within Nicolas Valley (Liefer Road) area. The City Council approved an agreement
PW08-06
II
Mei l
90% (0212010)
70%
for the street improvement design with David Evans and Associates at the 10/28/08 City
Account No. 210-165-502-58XX
AOdviar
Oddt
Amer Attar
Amar
Council Meeting. The kick off meeting for the design of the street improvements was held
on 12/17/08. Consultant has submitted 90% plans, specifications and estimate.
Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements- Phase I
Phase I includes the design & construction of Butterfield Stage Road (BSR) from Murrieta
Construction of Butterfield Stage Road/MHSR
Hot Springs Road (MHSR) to Calle Chapos, a portion of MHSR, Calle Chapos, South
Consultant: David Evans &Associates (DEA)
Loop Rd and making the Fire Station functional. Liens and settlements have been
Contract Amount: $304,125
m MaY De La
resolved. On 11/24/09, David Evans and Associates' (DEA) was awarded a contract to
PW09-02
I
Account No. 210-165-723-58XX
Tome/Amer
0%
0%
complete the design. 100% plans were submitted on 3/01/10; the City is currently
Attar
reviewing them. On 1/12/10 Hirsh & Associates, Inc. was awarded a contract to complete
the landscape design. Both consultants are working on completing the designs. Staff is
working on the Bid Package. The City Attorney is to review the impacts associated with
Paradigm's involvement in regards to the FDIC's new involvement.
Traffic Signal Installation - Citywide
Kendra
This project will install traffic signals at two intersections; Meadows Parkway at Pauba
Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road and Rancho
Hannah-
Road and Rancho California Road at Yukon Road. Notice To Proceed was issued
PW09-07
I
California Road at Yukon Road
Meistrell1
50% (0612010)
0%
12/21/09 for design activities. Completion of Plans and Specifications is anticipated in
Consultant: Willdan Engineering
Avlin R.
June 2010. Consultant has submitted 70% plans.
Contract Amt: $26,610
Odviar
1-15/SR-79S Ultimate Interchange
The City's consultant is preparing 30% PS&E package for Caltrans review in March 2010.
PW04-08
I
Consultant: RBF
Avlin Odviar
50% (0212011)
35%
Contract Amt: $2,032,600
EWA 01 Amt: $142,973
PROJECTS BEING DESIGNED BY STAFF
Long Canyon Detention Basin - Access Road
Plans and specifications are 90% complete. City is seeking FEMA funds to remove
PW04-07
I
??????????
0%
NIA
excess silt deposited within the basin before constructing the access road. Project is on
hold until FEMA determination is finalized.
Road and Storm Drain Repair at Rancho California
Storm drain pipes have been determined to be essentially sound. The approach from this
Road
point will take the form of rust removal and application of a protective coating to the pipe
PW09-08
I
Projectwill replace approximately 140 feet of aging
Jon Salazarl
0%
0%
interior to extend the life of the pipe; no major repair is anticipated. Authorization to bid
corrugated metal pipe under Rancho California Road,
Amer Attar
was obtained from Council at the 3/9/10 meeting; bid advertisement to begin shortly.
east of Hope Drive, with reinforced concrete pipe, and
reconstruct that portion ofthe roadway.
Citywide Storm Drain Improvements- Rancho
Authorization to bid was received from City Council at the January 26, 2010 City Council
California Rd at Vincent Moraga Dr
Jon Salazarl
Meeting; bid advertisement is to begin shortly.
PW09-09
I
Design and construct storm drain improvements to
Amer Attar
0%
0%
correct Flooding problems during storm events at this
location.
Road Reconstruction at Jedediah Smith Road
Staff is coordinating with a consultant to develop a bid package based on ARAM (Asphalt
PW09-10
I
Projectwill rebuild 28 feet (width) of roadway on
Jon Salazar/
0%
0%
Rubber Aggregate Membrane) technology. Authorization to bid was obtained from City
Jedediah Smith Road between Temecula Parkway
Amer Attar
Council at the 3/9/10 meeting; bid advertisement to begin shortly.
and Cabrillo Ave.
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
NO
PRIORITY
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
PAID ($)
bid date)
Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009-2010
This Project is the annual slurry seal project that will slurry seal local streets within the
PW 10-01
1
Contractor: xx
?���������
0%
p%
City.
Contract Amount: xx
Account Number: xx
Citywide Concrete Repairs FY 2009-2010
This project will consist of various concrete repair throughout the City. Specifications are
PW 10-02
1
Contractor: xx
??????????
0%
0%
complete and the tentative schedule is to solicit bids is mid April.
Contract Amount: xx
Account Number: xx
PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE
French Valley Parkway / Interstate 15 Over -Crossing
Project Report - Approved January 2010.
and Interchange Improvements (PA & ED)
Environmental Document - Approved January 2010.
Consultant: Moffatt & Nichol
New Connection Report - Under FHWA review.
Agreement Amount: $1,091,693.00
Freeway Agreements - Under Caltrans review.
Amend. No. 1 202,652.40*
:
Amend. No. 2: 21,630.00
CCO No. 1: 25,000.00
CCO No. 2: 8,000.00
CCO No. 3: 18,008.00
CCO No. 4: 11,320.00
William
PW02-11
I
CCO No. 5: 37,645.00
Becerral Avlin
y0%(06110)
90%
Amend. No. 3: 283,982.52
Odviarl Amer
Amend. No. 4: See PW07-04
Attar
Amend. No. 5: 169,000.00
Amend. No. 6: 110,917.00
Amend. No. 7: 14,573.36
Amend. No. 8 See PW07-04
Amend. No. 9 100,000.00
Amend No. 10 414,774.00
Notes:
> Amend. No. 1 also applies to PW07-04. See PW07
-04 for add'I apportionment.
PROJECTS WAITING IN THE WINGS
Temecula Creek Crossing - Access to Highway 79
The project consists of performing an alignment study to set a specific horizontal and
South (Temecula Parkway)
vertical alignment for an extension of Avenida de Missions southerly to gain vehicular
Bridge Alignment Study- Avenida de Missions over
Kendra
access to Loma Linda Road, including a bridge crossing over Temecula Creek. Final
PW08-03
11
Temecula Creek
Consultant Nol
Cote Associates, Inc.
annah-
Hannah -
Meistreill Avlin
100%
100%
engineering report is complete. Project is pending allocation of funds for design.
Contract Amount: $87,923.00
Odviar
Account No. 210-165-677-58XX
Multi -Trails System- Margarita Road Under Crossing
This project will construct a trail for bicycles and pedestrians along Santa Gertrudis Creek
Consultant: LAN Engineering
under Margarita Road. Data regarding existing utilities are being incorporated into the
PW04-13
I
Contract Amount: $114,426.00
William
100%
100%
design. RCFC has provided an Encroachment Permit. Plans & Specs are complete. This
Becerra
project cannot be constructed until adequate funds are identified. An application was
submitted for State Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) funds on 12/1/06.
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PRIORITY
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
NO
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
PAID ($)
bid date)
Auxiliary Lanes on I-15 in Temecula
A feasibility study will be conducted to determine if auxiliary lanes can be added between
on and off -ramps on 1-15 in Temecula to improve the freeway operation. An RFP to
PW06-17
I
Amer Attar
conduct the study was published on the City's website on 02/14/07. Proposals were
received on 03/16/07. The City reviewed the proposals and selected a consultant. Due to
funding constraints, this project is being delayed indefinitely.
RIGHT OF WAY RELATED PROJECTS
French Valley Parkway/ I-15 Overcrossing and
William
The review appraisal is complete. Caltrans has approved the appraisals. The City Council
PW02-11
I
Interchange, Project Report (PR)
Becerral Amer
NIA
NIA
reviewed this matter in Closed Session on June 9, 2009. Negotiations with two property
Attar
owners have begun and are on-going
Butterfield Stage Road - Roripaugh CFD
The developer will perform his MOU commitments and Obtain the required RNV. He was
Project Description: Right -of -Way issues associated
directed to first focus on the RNV issues related to properties within Ph 1 of the project. He
with the construction of specific improvements (BSR,
Mayne De La
was given City Attorney -approved release forms that the property owners must sign
CFD 03-02
MHSR, fire station, etc.)
Contractor: N/A; Contract: N/A
Tome/Amer
releasing the developer from all obligations. To date, the developer hasn't obtained any
Attar
signed release form. The FDIC has taken over the bank, Amtrust. Any funds to be
disbursed will have to be approved by the FDIC. It is unclear if the Developer is going to
have any future involvement. Discussions with the City Attorney are on-going.
Pechanga Parkway, Dual Right Turn Lanes from
Purchase & Sale Agreement was sent to the property Owner. He did not accepted the
Temecula Parkway
City's offer. City Council adopted the Resolution of Necessity at the 11/25/08 meeting. A
check was prepared for court deposit to file eminent domain lawsuit. Lawsuit was fled in
PW 06-11
Amer Attar
mid February. The City gained possession of the property as of June 5, 2009. Settlement
papers were signed by the property owner. The City attorney office is fling these papers
with the courts so the funds can be disbursed to the property owner and the matter can be
closed.
Pechanga Parkway, Mitigation Land
Purchase & Sale Agreement was sent to the property Owner. He has not accepted the
City's offer. City Council has adopted the Resolution of Necessity at the 11/25/08 meeting.
The City is working on the legal documents to gain possession of the property. The
PW 99-11
Amer Attar
California Department of Fish & Game (DFG) is now involved due to impacts to properties
that has Conservation Easements on them. They will have to sign off on this acquisition.
This will require discussions with them. The DFG just sent the City a response with
significant demands. Further discussions and a site visit are necessary. A site visit is
scheduled for 03/16/10.
Riverside County Flood Control Parcels -Old Town
Beryl
Final Purchase and Sale agreements4egals for portions of Museum, Theater and vacant
Yasinoskyl
property parcels are scheduled for City Coucil/RDA approval on 03/23/10. 1st/Front
Amer Attar
Street parcel agreement4egal descriptions is still in review.
Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension
To initiate this right of way work, seven title reports were ordered on 12/2/08. The City
received all legals and plats from the consultant. Staff met with the appraiser to go over
what needs to be acquired. The appraiser submitted a proposal for this work to the City. A
PW00-26
Amer Attar
PO is being processed so the work can begin. Property staking will be done to facilitate
the appraisal process. "Letters of a Decision to Appraise" were sent to all affected
property owners. The appraisal process is underway.
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PRIORITY
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
NO
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
PAID ($)
bid date)
Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek
Will Becerra)
City accepted the Offer of Dedication that was not accepted by County on Parcel Map PM
Beryl
8248, which was recorded on 2/15/1977. Four legals and plats will be prepared by the
PW06-04
I
Yasinoskyl
consultant. Title Reports for the required parcels were ordered. Once Iegals/plats are
Amer Attar
received, the City will obtain appraisals.
SPECIAL AND MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
Roripaugh Ranch CFD
Staff reviewed the submitted Reimbursement Request for the two bridges. Comments
were provided to Ashby USA representatives. Meetings were held with the developer
Annie Bostre-
seeking these reimbursements to finalize the numbers. The City Attorney was provided
CFD 03-02
Lel Amer Attar
NIA
the information. All outstanding liens have been paid. The City Attorney is to review the
impacts associated with Paradigm's involvement in regards to the FDIC's new
involvement..
CFD 01-02
Harveston CFD
Amer Attar
NIA
No activities during the last period
CFD 03-06
Harveston CFD
Amer Attar
NIA
NIA
No activities during the last period.
CFD 03-01
Crown Hill CFD
Amer Attar
NIA
NIA
During the last period, the developer submitted reimbursement request for the retention.
Wolf Creek CFD
Standard Pacific continues to obtain the required soundwall waivers. As of 09-08-09, 23
waivers have been received by the City. These waivers have been recorded. With respect
to properties in foreclosure, Caltrans advised the the developer is to write letters to the
CFD 03-03
Amer Attar
NIA
NIA
banks asking them to sign the waivers and that if developer does not hear from them
within a reasonable time, they can assume that the bank does not want the wall. In
addition, the developer started raising the walls the week of 07/06/09. Work on raising the
walls continues.
CFD 02-08
Serena Hills CFD
Amer Attar
NIA
NIA
No activities during the last period.
Quarterly Review- Tracking, preparing, and
Various Projects.
Various
I
processing Federal, State and TUMF Funds
Julie Dauer
On-going
NIA
Reimbursements
Contract Administration
On-going review of CIP project contracts, amendments, extra work authorizations &
Various
I
Julie Dauer
On-going
NIA
change orders and maintaining budget accounts. Providing assistance to staff in
processing invoices for all CIP division projects.
Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail
Project is complete and balance of federal funding to be requested for reimbursement and
PW01-27
I
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
submitted along with 'Final Report of Expenditures' for project closeout.
Surface Transportation Program (STP) - De Portola
Federal funding reimbursement requests will be submitted to Caltrans as project
PW06-10
I
Road Pavement Rehabilitation
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
progresses. $458,990 STP funds
PW03-05
I
Highway Bridge Replacement & Rehabilitation
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
Total HBRR funds $4,337,970.
Program (HBRR) - Main Street Bridge
SR2S- Safe Routes to School Program - Ped/Bicycle
Awaiting approval of environmental document from Caltrans. SR2S funding has been
PW05-11
I
Bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek to Chaparral Hig
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
awarded in the amount of $425,520. In addition to SR2S funding we have been awarded
$132,000 in SB821 funding.
CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 OF 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS - MONTHLY WORK PROGRESS SHEET 3/15/2010
%TIME
PROJECT
PRIORITY
PROJECT NAME, DESCRIPTION,
PROJECT
COMPLETE
CONTRACT
CURRENT STATUS & PROGRESS
NO
CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT $'s
ENGINEER
(Est. comp./
PAID ($)
bid date)
Various
I
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
TUMF reimbursement requests prepared quarterly for submittal to WRCOG & RCTC.
TE - Transportation Enhancement
Received approval of our 'Request for Allocation' through the CTC and have submitted our
PW06-15
I
Winchester Road/State Route 79 North Corridor
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
RFA package to Caltrans for'Authorization to Proceed with Construction'. Total funds
Beautification Projec
awarded per TE Funding adjustments $1,646,000.
Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements-
Project is essentially complete and upon payment of retention to contractor will process
PW99-11
I
Public Land & Highways Funded
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
'Final Report of Expenditures' and final invoice for reimbursement to Caltrans. Total PLH
(Phase II)
funding is $4,000,000.
Various
I
Bond Releases
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
Continued review of CIP project bonds scheduled for release.
2006/07 Bicycle Transportation Account
Cooperative Work Agreement (CWA) has been approved by Caltrans, BTA division. The
BTA Funds
CWA will extend the terms of the original agreement to allow for the continuation of project
PW08-04
I
Santa Gertrudis Creek Bicycle Trail Extension and
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
design. 2006/07 BTA funds approved for the planning & preliminary engineering and total
Interconnect
award of $395,000.
Standardize the format of the Specifications for all
Specifications library is continuously being updated and amended. The boiler -plate section
projects
is also being reviewed and updated. Federal Specifications were updated and
David McBride
On-going
NIA
standardized for De-Portola and Rancho California Road. All specifications were updated
to 2009. Federal specifications were updated to new DBE regulations.
Circulation Element Implement Plan
This Project is to identify all future projects necessary so that the current Circulation
Element of the General Plan is fully implemented. Data entry into the database is
complete. The tasks of field verification, cost estimates preparation, and aerial mapping
Amer Attar
NIA
NIA
have all been completed. The information gathering and the reporting stage of this
project is complete. CIP staff will work with GIS to automate the availability and the update
of the information.
Update Plans to Reflect As -Built Conditions for All
City receives blue prints from many contractors marked with As -Built conditions for various
Recent Projects
projects. Some of these As -Built conditions have never been transferred to the project
On-going 9 9
NIA
mylars. As -Built plans will be created for all recent projects, if it was not done at the time of
submission.
Consultant Selection
Information is now available on the City's web -site on how to be placed on the consultant
Various
I
Julie Dauer
On-going
NIA
(vendor) list and data stored in this manner will be source for future RFP's & RFQ's for
upcoming projects.
Pavement Rehabilitation - Rancho California Road
Project is currently in construction and preparation of reimbursement invoices will be
PW06-14
I
(STPL)
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
prepared for submittal to Caltrans as project progresses. STPL funding of $2,958,000.
Pavement Rehabilitation of Rancho California Road
from Ynez Road to Butterfield Stage Road
Citywide Traffic Light Synchronization System
City has been awarded $515,000 in Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP) funding
Purchase, install & implement an adaptive traffic
(Prop 1 B). Our request for Allocation has been submitted to the California Transportation
TBD
I
signal synchronization system along six corridors
Julie Dauer
NIA
NIA
Commission (CTC) for placement on their agenda for November 12, 2009 meeting. State
within the City.
to sell additional bonds to meet allocation requests.
Item No. 22
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager
DATE: March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: Economic Development Departmental Monthly Report
PREPARED BY: Christine Damko, Economic Development Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
The following lists some recent highlights of the Economic Development Department for the
month of February 2010:
SITE VISITS AND RIBBON CUTTINGS
February 5th: Staff attended a ribbon cutting for the Old Town Sweet Shop (formally The Country
Store).
February 16th: Staff and EDC representatives attended a site visit at Brookstone Emergency
Services. Brookstone Emergency Services has been a leader in providing highly specialized
services to meet the needs of local, state, and federal agencies. They have participated in
numerous incidents in California and across the nation relating to fire, emergency and disaster
preparedness, including Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita.
February 19th: Council Member Chuck Washington and Staff attended the ribbon cutting for
Promethean Biofuels Cooperative Corporation. Promethean converts cooking oil to biofuel. The
cooking oil can also be blended with diesel and is nearly 100 percent emission -free.
February 23 d: Staff, EDC and Temecula Chamber of Commerce representatives attended a site
visit for Temecula Recycling. Temecula Recycling, a family owned and operated facility offers a wide
variety of services including the recycling of most metals, cardboard, paper, and plastics. Temecula
Recycling also serves industrial and commercial businesses.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEWS
February 8`h through February 12`h, Staff in conjunction with Team California and Riverside
Economic Development Agency (EDA) exhibited at the Medical Design and Manufacturing
(MDM) Conference in Anaheim. MDM is one of the largest medical manufacturing conferences
in the western Unites States.
MEETINGS OF INTEREST
February 4`h: Staff attended the EDC Resource Team meeting and site tour at Azusa Pacific
University in Murrieta.
February 10`h: Staff attended the Temecula Chamber of Commerce Membership Committee
meeting and updated the group on upcoming special events and recently approved projects.
February 18`h: Staff attended the EDC Board of Directors General Meeting in Lake Elsinore.
February 22"': Staff partnered with the Temecula Chamber of Commerce on providing a "How to
Do Business with the City" vendor training. Approximately 25 local businesses attended the
training.
February 22"': Staff attended the RDA/Old Town Steering Committee with Council Members
Ron Roberts and Maryann Edwards. The meeting focused on the Old Town Specific Plan
updates.