Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout041608 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 16, 2008 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Wednesday, April 16, 2008, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio Absent: None PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Larry Borcherding, Temecula, relayed his concern with new homes being built behind his home, and the obstruction of his view from his backyard. For Mr. Borcherding, Assistant City Manager Johnson advised that staff would contact him to address his concerns. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Director's Hearing Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 2 Planning Application No. LR08-0019, review the proposed Heritage Tree Ordinance. adding Chapter 8.36 to Title 8 of the Municipal Code, and recommend that the Citv Council adopt the Ordinance. Emerv Papp By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Senior Planner Papp highlighted on the following • Project Description • Background • Analysis • General Plan • Environmental Determination With respect to 8.36.230 Exception in the proposed Ordinance, under Public, Senior Planner Papp noted that this would apply to CIP projects; however, there would be exceptions that could be made in the event there was a threat to safety or removing a tree to widen a roadway. Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that Director of Public Works Hughes was involved in the proposed Ordinance and was comfortable with the language, but noted that it would not be a problem to add clarifying language. Having many years of experience with oak trees, Commissioner Chiniaeff queried if staff was referencing large circumference trees or large diameter trees. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Senior Planner Papp noted that the proposed Ordinance references large circumference trees measured at 4-feet above the ground. With respect to solar easements, Senior Planner Papp noted that the proposed Ordinance would address when it would be appropriate to alter a heritage tree which would include maintenance and/or pruning. For the Planning Commission, Senior Papp noted that the Planning Commission is being asked to approve the proposed Ordinance which is accompanied by the policy, but that the policy would not be referenced in the proposed Ordinance but would not be part of the proposed Ordinance; noted that for clarity purposes, an Arborist should review the definitions with respect to "Drip Lines'. Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that if the intention would be to preserve Oak Trees, he would encourage staff to work with an Arborist with respect to implementing a Heritage Tree Ordinance. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that the proposed Ordinance and policy manual would be two separate documents. After much discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission for staff to address the following issues and further clarify the following: • Proposed Ordinance: 8.36.230 Exceptions • Proposed Ordinance: 8.36.500 Definitions • Proposed Ordinance: 8.36.200 Mitigation Considerations • Proposed Ordinance: 8.36.310 Heritage Tree Preservation and Protection Plan • Proposed Ordinance: 8.36.410 Enforcement Remedies for Violation • Proposed Ordinance: 8.36.420 Collection of Penalties • Policy Manual: 2.4 Trenching and Protection Zones • Policy Manual: 3.2 C Protecting Fencing • Policy Manual: 4.0 Definitions • That inventory of all oak trees throughout the City be assessed • That a certified Arborist be involved in the process of the proposed Ordinance • That all trees should be identified and treated differently (per species) MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue staff recommendation to 45 days to allow staff an opportunity to define and clarify the above mentioned issues. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. With respect to Ynez Road and Tierra Vista, Deputy Director of Public Works York advised that the developer has been conditioned to install sidewalks. Chairperson Telesio reiterated his concern with merchandise (obstructions) in the walkway areas in front of stores and would request that Code Enforcement explore these types of scenarios at the various stores in the area. Mr. Telesio also remarked on the aesthetics of the new building at Margarita Road and Pauba Road (Paloma), noting that the back side facing Margarita Road displays the exposed air conditioning units which results in an eye-sore to the community. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Planning advised that staff is currently working on an Ordinance that will address foreclosures, noting that a workshop will be held which will include staff, property management companies, and residents of Temecula. ADJOURNMENT At 7:10 pm, Chairman Telesio formally adjourned to May 7, 2008 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. John Te sio Chairman ~~~ c~~ Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning