The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAsBuilt Geology Rough Grading I I@ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OPnntot<l"" ,",,,,," Pap." Converse Consultants Over 50 Years of Dedication in Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Sciences AS-BUILT GEOLOGY. ROUGH GRADING, GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION REPORT Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California .' Prepared For: Newland Communities 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 253 Temecula, California Converse Project No. 99-81-112-53 March 6, 2003 \ 10391 Corporate Drive, Redlands, California 92374 Telephone: (909) 796-0544 . Facsimile: (90g) 796-7675 . e~mail: redlands@converseconsultants.com I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I @ Converse Consultants Over 50 Years of Dedication in Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Sciences March 6, 2003 Mr. Jim Stewart Director of Engineering Newland Communities 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 253 Temecula, CA 92591 Subject: AS-BUILT GEOLOGY. ROUGH GRADING, GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION REPORT Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Converse Project No. 99-81-112-53 Dear Mr. Stewart: Converse Consultants (Converse) has prepared this report to present the results of our geotechnical/geology observations, field density and laboratory testing performed during roughlmass grading of the tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 in the Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community, Temecula, California. These services were performed in accordance with our proposal dated February 11, 1999. Field density tests were performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard 01556-00 (Sand Cone) and 02922-96 (Nuclear Gauge) test methods to determine the in-place density of compacted fill soils. The approximate test locations are plotted on Drawings No. 1 through 7, Field Density Test Locations. Results of the field density tests performed during roughlmass grading are summarized in Table No. A-1, Summary of Field Density Test Results, in Appendix A, Summary of Field Density Test Results. Laboratory testing performed during rough/mass grading included tests to determine maximum dry density and optimum moisture relationships of the soils used as compacted fill in accordance with the ASTM Standard 01557-00 test method. The results of these laboratory tests are summarized in Table No. B-1, Summary of Laboratory Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Test Results, in Appendix B, Laboratory Testing Program. 1-- OPrml~dO/'l ... R"~1c,..<l ... Pape' 10391 Corporate Drive, Redlands, California 92374 Telephone: (909) 796~0544 . Facsimile (909) 796-7675 . e-mail: ccieconv@aolcom I I I I I I I I I II I I , I I I I I I I As-buill Geology and Rough Grading Report Tract Nos. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page ii Based on the results of our field observation, in-place density and laboratory testing, it is our opinion that the earthwork associated with the roughlmass grading of the subject Tracts has been completed in substantial compliance with the project plans and specifications. We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service to the Newland Communities. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at (909) 796-0544. CONVERSE CONSULTANTS I I \ Hashmi S. E. Quazi, Ph.D., P. E. Senior Vice President/Principal Engineer Dist.: 5/Addressee HSQ/wHC/bag ,; ~ ~ Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICE\JOBFILE\ 1999\81\99-112\99112-53.asb I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tract Nos. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page Hi PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION This report has been prepared by the staff of Converse Consultants (Converse) under the supervision of the registered engineer and engineering geologist whose seals and signatures appear hereon. The findings, conclusions, recommendations, or professional opinions presented in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering and engineering geologic principles and practice in effect in Southern California at this time. There is no other warranty, either expressed or implied. _>il;~/)-;F I~-l~-~~'\- l~t/J '....-, Roy J.'Rushing, C.E.G.-~ ~ Senior Geologist e~~): I/i;~ " 0' RUs1,-",ii' 'I~ Cl >:;y <;\, ICo <l.:' G> o~\ ~ ~\ ,'-' -< I Itc. waD .L ~ Exp.h'- j 1- I' I 1\- 0i;'~~':-"C ~~l\t't~ ~.. ":-;7 _ C;,.' c- e#~~~ M~~<;)~.;j;:0-HSt,'i/..1.')..~ ~9.: ~'-'1>%;".,;.-.,. .fl,....,;:, (';:'v" ~~fj 6' ,,"24[;2 ~)~~. LU In \."\ "',.,{/!2"6 fJJ ,-1tf, . J"* . ~ (I" G'^ ~ ~'C,:JJ '>;;;~;;;."... William H, Chu Principal Engineer, G.E. ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFILEI1999181199-112199112-30.asb I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tract Nos. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 2.1 GENERAL 1 2.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2 2.3 SITE GRADING (EARTHWORK REQUlREMENTSIRECOMMENDA TIONS 2 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 4 3.1 FIELD OBSERVATION AND IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING 4 3.2 . LABORATORY TESTING 4 3.3 DATA EVALUATION AND REpORT PREPARATION 5 4.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND GROUNDWATER 5 4.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING 5 4.2 PREGRADING GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 6 4.3 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS OBSERVED DURING GRADING 6 4.4 GROUNDWATER 6 5.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY 6 5.1 FAULTING 6 5.2 SEISMICITY 7 6.0 GRADING AND EARTHWORK 7 6.1 GENERAL 7 7.0 FIELD DENSITY AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 8 7.1 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS 8 7.2 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 9 8_0 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION 9 8.1 BUlLDING FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS 9 8.2 SLABS-ON-GRADE 11 8.3 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS 13 8.4 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SECTIONS 13 8.5 CONCRETE WALKS, DRlVEW A YS, ACCESS RAMPS, CURB AND GUTTER 14 8.6 CORROSION PROTECTION 15 9.0 CONCLUSIONS 17 a>- W Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-30.asb A I il I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tract Nos. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page v 10.0 LIMITATIONS 17 11.0 REFERENCES 19 ILLUSTRA nONS Following Page No. Figure No.1, Site Location Map ................................................ ......... ... ......................1 TABLES Table No.1, Suggested Guidelines for Design & Construction of Foundations and Slabs-on-Grade for One- and Two-Story Residential Buildings... ............ .12 Table No.2, Recommended Pavement Sections.................................................14 Drawings NO.1 through 7, Field Density Test Locations .....................In Map Pockets APPENDICES Appendix A....................................................... Summary of Field Density Test Results Appendix B........... ..............................................................Laboratory Testing Program Appendix C..... ..... ...............................................................Soil Corrosivity Study ~ ~ Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-30.asb -5 I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report contains the results of geotechnical field observations, in-place density and laboratory testing, geotechnical design and construction recommendations performed during roughlmass grading of Lots NO.1 through 73 of Tract 24188, Lots NO.1 through 118 of Tract 24188-2, and Lots No. 1 through 100 of Tract 24188-3 in the Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community, in Temecula, California. Earthwork associated with the rough/mass grading was performed by TNT Grading Inc., from July through October 2002. Rough/mass grading was performed in accordance with the requirements and recommendations set forth in the project rough/mass grading plans prepared by the Keith Companies, grading requirements of the County of Riverside, Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC, 1997) and the geotechnical report listed below: "Geotechnica/ Investigation Report, Tracts 24136, 24187, 24188, and 25418, Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community, City of Temecula, California", prepared by Converse Consultants, dated May 6,1999, Project No. 99-81-112-01, This report was prepared for the project described herein and was intended for the sole use of Newland Communities and its authorized agent(s). It may not contain sufficient information for use by others andlor for any other purposes. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 General Prior to grading, the subject tracts consisted of undeveloped but partially disturbed land situated in an unincorporated area of Riverside County, California, as shown in Figure No.1, Site Location Map. The proposed Tracts are bound on the north by Pauba Road, on the east by Butterfield Road, on the south by Meadows Drive, and on the west by Meadows Parkway. The topography at the site was characterized by a series of well rounded gently sloping hills that descended from approximately 1335 feet MSL in the northeast corner to approximately 1180 feet MSL in the southwest corner. A well- defined east-west-draining channel divided the site. Fill soils associated with the grading within the site have been observed by Converse. The northwest corner of the site also included pre-existing certified fill areas. The southern-most valley fill area was covered with loose fill soils that contained construction debris. Vegetation consisted ~ ~ W Converse Consultants CCI ENTlOFFICEIJOBFILE\2001 181 10 1-26510 1265-30.asb I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO CORONA C1J c::: z ~ -\ ::(j '" ~ Al ~'<- \f) ~ ~ V-p..pG R/l' Q;-4'; \:J ~ S\: fT\ c1 Gl if ~ I R pH" PROJECT SITE pAUBA City 0 f Temeculo DE PORtOLA A E HIGHWAY CAMPANULA WAY V\ TO SAN DIEGO VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE LOCATION MAP Scale Project No. PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Not To Scale 99-81-112-53 Date March, 2003 Prepared by KQ Checked by GT Approved by RJR Figure No. @ Converse Consultants 1 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As.Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community T emecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 2 primarily of grasses and tumbleweeds, with some shrubs in the hilly regions. A few trees were located adjacent to the channel. 2.2 Proposed Development Development of the subject property is proposed as single-family residential housing tracts. It is our understanding that the development will include construction of one andlor two-story single-family residences and associated driveways, streets with curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and above and underground utilities. The residences are likely to be of wood-frame and stucco construction founded on continuous andlor isolated footing foundations with slab-on-grade. Based on the grading plans provided by the Keith Companies, entitled "Tract No. 24188- 2, Rough Grading", dated 5/29/02 Sheet No.1, 4/22/02 Sheets No.3, 4, 6, and 9, 5/30102 Sheet Nos. 2, 5, 7, and 8, and 5/31/02 Sheets No. 10, 11, and 12, cut- and fill-slopes within the subject lots were planned to be constructed at gradients no steeper than 2:1 horizontal:vertical (H:V). The maximum removal depth was on the order of approximately 25 feet, and the maximum fill thickness is on the order of approximately 44 feet. A natural drainage valley is to remain undeveloped. Information on anticipated subsurface conditions and recommendations for tract development including earthwork, were provided by the above-referenced geotechnical report. 2.3 Site Grading /Earthwork Requirements/Recommendations Site grading was performed in accordance with the development requirements set forth in the above-referenced rough/mass grading plans. Based on the grading plans and the existing ground surface elevations, site grading involved cut within portions of the tracts, and using the soil cuttings compacted as fill within other portions of the tract. The natural grade of the terrain is shown in the set of above referenced drawings by the Keith Companies. Proposed final grades are also shown in each drawing. The project Geotechnical Investigation Report, referenced in Section 1.0, Introduction, contains site-specific grading and earthwork recommendations. The recommendations from the report are summarized as follows: ~ W Converse Consultants 'b CCIENTlOFFICEIJOBFILE\2001 181 101.265101265.30.asb I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As. Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 3 . Surface trash, vegetation and other organic materials should be removed from the grading area. Organic matter resulting from the clearing and grubbing should be hauled off-site. . The surficial soil and loose shallow colluvial soils should be removed to bedrock by stripping during grading. These soils vary in thickness from 3 to 11 feet. Artificial fills are present within the east-west drainage. The road fill slopes for Meadows Parkway, Pauba Road, and Butterfield Stage Road will require overexcavation and replacement as compacted fill. The temporary back-cut slope configuration adjacent to these roadways will be dependent upon existing utilities, height of slope and proposed final grades. Artificial fills placed as part of Pas eo Del Sol grading will require overexcavation of the approximately upper two (2) feet of soils disturbed by erosion; vegetation andlor deposits of undocumented fill. Existing fill/natural contacts are anticipated to require excavation up to 6 feet to remove colluvial soils adjacent to compacted fill. . The cut andlor fill transition lots should be over-excavated to provide at least three (3) feet of compacted fill over the entire pad. . Proposed fills shall be placed on competent subgrade soils as determined by representatives from the geotechnical consultant. . After removal of unsuitable materials, subgrade soil surfaces that will receive compacted fills shall be scarified to a depth of at least twelve (12) inches. The scarified soils shall be moisture-conditioned within two percent of optimum and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction as per ASTM Standard 01557-00 test method. . Soils removed during excavation procedures may be utilized as compacted fill, provided they have been cleaned of organic and other deleterious matter. . Fill shall be placed in suitable lifts, with lift thickness modified as necessary to achieve adequate compaction. Fill should be compacted mechanically throughout to the specified density at or above the optimum moisture content. . All fill shall be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent as per ASTM Standard 01557-00 test method. If the thickness of structural fill is more than 20 feet, we recommend that the upper 20 feet of fill be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction and that the remainder of the fill below 20 ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFiLE\200 1 \81 \01-265\0 1265.30.asb l\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 4 feet be compacted to 95 percent relative compaction as per ASTM Standard D1557-91. · Fill placed over cut slopes or natural slopes shall be benched into unyielding bedrock or native soil. · In-place density and moisture content of the compacted fill soils shall be measured in accordance with the ASTM Standard 01556-00 andlor ASTM 02922-96 test methods. If a field density test shows less than the required minimum relative compaction or moisture more or less than within the specified range, additional compaction efforts or moisture conditioning shall be applied to the fill volume represented by the failing test until a subsequent field density test shows passing results. · All cut slopes remaining at the site should be over-excavated and replaced with compacted fill, as directed by Newland Communities. Geologic observation of all cut slopes should be conducted during grading to observe if any adversely oriented planes of weakness are present. . Fill slopes should be constructed no steeper than 2:1 H:V and should be properly compacted out to slope face. This may either be achieved by either over building and cutting back to the compacted core or by utilizing other methods that meet the intent of the project specifications. 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 3.1 Field Observation and In-place Density Testing Full-time observation of grading and field density testing of compacted fill soils were performed by Converse soil technicians working under the supervision of the project engineer and geologist. Our scope of work also included providing necessary geotechnical consultation services during rough/mass grading. 3.2 Laboratory Testing Our scope of work during rough/mass grading included laboratory maximum density/optimum moisture tests to evaluate the dry density and moisture content ~ W Converse Consultants CCI ENT\OFFICEIJOBFILE\2001 181 101-26510 1265.30 .asb \0 I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Pas eo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 5 relationships of the fill soils. The results of these laboratory tests were utilized in the evaluation of the in-place density of the compacted fills. Additional laboratory tests including sieve analysis, sand equivalent, direct shear, consolidation, corrosivity, R-value, and expansion index were performed on representative samples retrieved at the completion of roughlmass grading. 3.3 Data Evaluation and Report Preparation The lead field technician and project engineer examined data obtained during field density testing for the purposes of quality assurancelcontrol. The results of laboratory tests were analyzed and evaluated for relevant engineering parameters, This report was prepared to summarize field observations, results of geologic mapping, and field density and laboratory testing. Results of additional laboratory testing, data analysislinterpretation, geotechnical design parameters and construction recommendations for building foundations, slabs- on-grade, and associated facilities are provided in this report. 4.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND GROUNDWATER A general description of the regional and site-specific geologic hazards was presented in the above-referenced geotechnical investigation report. A portion of the discussions is presented herein for continuity. Presented also in this section is a description of the subsurface conditions, various materials and groundwater conditions encountered at the site during geotechnical investigation and grading. 4.1 Geologic Setting II , \ I I I I I The site is situated within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of Southern California, which is an area that extends from the San Gabriel Mountains southeasterly into Baja, California, Mexico. This geomorphic province is characterized by northwesterly trending mountain ranges bounded by systems of northwesterly trending faults and alluvial-filled basins. The project area lies along the southwestern edge of the Perris Block, a northwest-trending structural block that lies between the Elsinore Fault Zone on the southwest and the San Jacinto Fault Zone on the northwest. The Perris Block is characterized by Mesozoic metamorphic and plutonic rock and Cenozoic sedimentary and volcanic rock formations that form hills of low to moderate relief. The subject site is underlain by late Pleistocene Pauba Formation- siltstone, sandstone and conglomerate which crops out nearly continuously for more than three miles in the lower Pauba Valley. ~ ~ Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFILE\2001 181 101-265101265-30.asb \\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 2418B.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 6 4.2 Pregrading Geologic Conditions The project site was underlain by residual soils, alluvium and sedimentary bedrock (Pauba formation) near surface and at depth. 4.3 Geologic Conditions Observed During Grading Residual and alluvium soils were encountered within the project site, as anticipated. These materials consisted of silty sands, sandy silts and clays. They were removed to competent soils or bedrock prior to placement of compacted fill. Sedimentary bedrock underlies the soil and alluvium at depth and is also exposed in outcrops at the ground surface. No unusual or unanticipated geologic conditions were encountered during grading. 4.4 Groundwater As reported in the referenced preliminary geotechnical investigation report, groundwater was encountered in the exploratory borings drilled during the previous investigations performed by Converse. These borings were located within the topographically low-lying alluvial areas. Depths to groundwater as encountered in the exploratory borings at the time of drilling range between 18 and 22 feet. Some slight seepage was observed during toe-of-fill keyway excavation along lots No.1 through 6 of tract No. 24188-3. 5.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY 5.1 Faulting As discussed in the geotechnical report dated May 6, 1999, there are no known active faults projecting toward or extending across the project site. The nearest known active fault zones designated as the Earthquake Fault Zone by the State of California is the Elsinore Fault. The Temecula (Elsinore) Fault Zone is located southwest of the project site and is about 2.0 mile from the southwest corner of the proposed site. ~ ~ Converse Consultants CCIENliOFFICE\JOBFI LE\200 1 \81 \0 1.265\0 1265-30.asb \2- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community T emeeula, California March 6, 2003 Page 7 5.2 Seismicity The project site is situated in a seismically active region. As is the case for most areas of Southern California, ground shaking resulting from earthquakes associated with nearby and distant faults may occur. During the life of the project, seismic activity associated with active faults in the area may generate moderate to strong ground shaking at the site. According to the Uniform Building Code (1997), the project site is situated in Seismic Zone 4. Major damage corresponding to intensities VIII or higher on the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale may occur within this zone. Seismic Zone 4 also includes those areas that lie within a zone of major (Richter Magnitude, M>7) historic earthquakes and recent high levels of seismicity. Seismic foundation design parameters as presented in the referenced geotechnical investigation report dated May 6, 1999, and Recommended Site Coefficients letter prepared by Converse Consultants in March 22, 2002, remain applicable and are presented in Section 8.3, Seismic Design Parameters, of this report. There have been no changes in the potentials for secondary effects due to seismic activity. 6.0 GRADING AND EARTHWORK 6.1 General Earthwork associated with grading was performed by TNT Grading, Inc. between July 23 and October 29, 2002. Earthwork equipment included dozers, excavators, loaders, scrapers, motor graders, water trucks and water pulls. Prior to grading, the ground surface was grubbed and cleared of vegetation, and all deleterious debris was removed and disposed off-site. Alluvial soils within the overexcavation areas were removed to competent bedrock. Subgrade soils were scarified, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction as per ASTM Standard 01557-00 test method prior to placement of compacted fill soils. Excavated site soils and import soils were placed as compacted fill. Fill was placed in loose, six (6) to eight (8) inch thick lifts, mixed and moisture conditioned, if necessary, within two (2) percent optimum moisture. The loose fill lifts were then compacted to a a>- W Converse Consultants CCI ENTlOFF ICEIJOBF I LE\200 1 181 10 1-26510 1265-30.asb \" I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 8 relative compaction of at least 90 percent as indicated by random in-place density testing. Where proposed fill depths were greater than 20 feet, that portion of the fill below 20 feet from finished grade, was compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction. The field density tests were performed in accordance with either the ASTM Standard 01556-00 or 02922-96 test methods. If the results of a field density test indicated failing results, the representative fill volume was reworked and re-compacted by the contractor until a subsequent field density test indicated passing results. Where fill was placed against existing slopes steeper than 5:1 H:V, the new fill slopes were keyed and benched to provide increased lateral support. The surficial unsuitable soils were removed when present. Generally, fill slopes were over-built three (3) to four (4) feet and were compacted as they were filled horizontally. Overfilled slope faces were then trimmed to finish grade. Per instructions from Newland Communities personnel, all proposed cut slopes were over-excavated and replaced with compacted fill. The slope fill was continuous with the both the fill pad below and the fill pad at the top of the slope. 7.0 FIELD DENSITY AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 7.1 Field Density Test Results The earthwork associated with the grading was observed from a geotechnical point of view and in-place density of the compacted soil was tested by Converse on a full-time basis. At the end of each working day, our lead soil technician prepared a Daily Field Report of Grading Observation documenting the geotechnical observations made during the day. A copy of the daily field report was submitted to the client's representative. Nuclear Gauge (ASTM Standard 02922-96) and/or Sand Cone (ASTM Standard 01556-00) test methods were utilized to evaluate the in-place density of compacted fills at random locations. The results of the field density tests performed during rough/mass grading are summarized in Table No. A-1, Summary of Fie/d Density Test Results, located in Appendix A, Summary Of Field Density Test Results. The approximate locations of the field density tests are plotted in Drawings NO.1 through 7, Field Density Test Locations. ~ W Converse Consultants CCI ENTlOFFICE\JOBFI LE\200 1 181 10 1.265\0 1265-30.asb \A. II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 9 The relative compaction for each field density test reported in Table No. A-1, Summary of Field Density Test Results, is obtained by dividing the measured in-place dry density by the maximum laboratory dry density of the same "soil type" presented in Table No. B-1, Summary of Laboratory Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Tests, in Appendix B, Laboratory Testing Program. The required minimum relative compaction for each test is also shown in the "Required Relative Compaction" in Table No. A-1, Summary of Field Density Test Results. 7.2 Laboratory Test Results Representative bulk samples of the fill soils were retrieved during rough/mass grading and tested in the laboratory to determine their laboratory maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents. These tests were performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard D1557-00 test method. Results of these tests are summarized in Table B-1, Summary of Laboratory Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Tests. At the completion of the grading, representative bulk samples were collected and tested for expansion potential. Results of these tests are presented in Table B-2, Summary of Expansion Index Test Results. Results of other laboratory testing including R-value, sand equivalent, grain size analysis, direct shear, consolidation, and corrosivity are also presented in Appendix B. 8.0 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION This section contains our recommendations regarding design and construction of various facilities including building foundations, slabs-on-grade, retaining walls, pavements, driveways, walkways, and curb and gutter. 8.1 Building Foundation and Retaining Walls One and/or two-story buildings and retaining walls may be supported by continuous andlor isolated spread footings. Foundation design as presented in Section 9.1 of the geotechnical investigation report dated May 6, 1999 is still applicable. Continuous footings should be at least 12 inches and 18 inches wide for one-story and two-story buildings, respectively. The recommended minimum depth of embedment and reinforcement for footings for various ranges of expansion potential of the subgrade soils are included in Table No.1, Suggested Guidelines For Design and Construction of Foundations and Slabs-On- ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICE\JOBFILE\2001 \81 \01-265\01265-30.asb ",. \:::> I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 1 0 Grade for One and Two Story Residential Buildings. For lot classifications based on expansion potential, see Table No. B-2, Summary of Expansion Index Test Results, in Appendix B, Laboratory Testing Program, Structural design may require wider footings andlor more reinforcement. Footings placed at a depth of 12 inches and 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade may be designed based on an allowable net bearing capacity of 1,800 pounds per square foot (psf) and 2,000 psf, respectively. . This bearing stress may be increased by one-third for short duration loading such as wind or seismic forces. This allowable bearing pressure should be used with the allowable stress design load combinations specified in Section 1612.3, Load Combinations Using Allowable Stress Design, of the UBC (1997). Building clearance from ascending slopes, footing setback from descending slopes and foundation elevations should meet the requirements of Section 1806.5, Footings on or Adjacent to Slopes, of the UBC (1997). Active lateral earth pressures from soils at the site may be taken as equal to that developed by a fluid of density of 45 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for horizontal backfill conditions. At-rest earth pressure may be taken as equal to that developed by a fluid of density of 65 pcf, In recommending these values, it is assumed that adequate measures will be taken to prevent development of hydrostatic pressure on the retaining walls during their service life. Resistance to lateral loads can be assumed to be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressures against the sides of the foundations andlor walls. An ultimate value of the coefficient of friction of 0.35 between concrete and soil may be used with the dead load forces. An allowable value of the passive earth pressure resistance of 250 psf per foot of depth (including a factor of safety of 1.5) may be used for the sides of footingslretaining walls. The maximum value of the passive pressure should be limited to 2,500 psf. The lateral resistances provided by the friction and the passive resistances may be combined directly without any reduction. These lateral resistances may be increased by one-third for short duration seismiclwind forces. Footings should be founded on firm and uniform native bedrock or compacted fill. Footing excavations should be observed and approved by the project geotechnical consultant after the rebaris in place and prior to placing any concrete. ~ W Converse Consultants CCI ENTlOFFICEIJOBFILE\200 1 \81 10 1-26510 1265-30.asb \" I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community T emecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 11 The total footing settlement will depend, among other factors, on the actual load applied to the subgrade soils, type of subgrade materials (e.g. bedrock or compacted fills), soil type, thickness of compacted fills underneath the footings and changes in the moisture conditions of the subsurface soils. Anticipated total settlements of footings, designed and constructed in accordance with the recommendations provided herein, should be less than one (1) inch. The expected differential settlement between similarly loaded footings for individual residences may be taken as equal to one half of the total settlement. 8.2 Slabs-On-Grade Based on the expansion index tests, the pad subgrade soils can be classified as having very low to high expansion potential as shown in Table No. B-2, Summary of Expansion Index Test Results, in Appendix B, Laboratory Testing Program. Recommendations regarding slabs-on-grade thickness, reinforcement and presoaking of subgrade soils at the time of construction should be determined for each lot using Table NO.1 below, and the expansion index representative of that lot as determined from Table No. B-2, in Appendix B. TABLE NO.1, SUGGESTED GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS-ON-GRADE FOR ONE. AND TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Foundation System Type I Type II Type III Type IV Type V Expansion Potential Very Low Low Medium Hiqh Very Hiqh Expansion Index 0.20 21.50 51 - 90 91.130 Above 130 (E.!.) Footing Depth One Two One Two One Two One Two One Two Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Perimeter JZ 18" JZ 18" 1.[: 1.[: 1.[: 1.[: 30" 30" Interior 12" 18" 12" 18" 12" 18" 18" 18" 18" 18" Footing 1-#4 Bar 1 -#4 Bar 1. #4 Bar 2-#4 Bars 2- #4 Bars Reinforcement Top and Bottom Top and Bottom Top and Bottom Top and Bottom Top and Bottom Garage Grade 12" x 12" 12" x 12" 12" x 12" 12" x 12" 18" x 18" Beam At Door w11. # 4 Bar w/1.#4Bar w/1- # 4 Bar w/1- # 4 Bar w11. # 4 Bar Opening Top and Bottom Top and Bottom Top and Bottom Top and Bottom Top and Bottom Floor Slab 4" Actual 4" Actual 4" Actual 4" Actual 6" Actual Thickness ~ W Converse Consultants CCI ENTlOFFICEIJOBFI LE\200 1 181 10 1.265101265.30.asb \1 , . I. . I . I I I I I I I I I I I . I I As. Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 12 TABLE NO.1, SUGGESTED GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS-ON-GRADE FOR ONE- AND TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Foundation System Type I 'Type II Type III Type IV Type V . Floor Slab #3 rebar al 18" O.C.. #3 rebar al 18" O.C.. #3 rebar al 18" O.C.. Reinforcement each way or 6" x 6" - each way or 6" x 6" - each way or 6" x 6" - #4 al 18" o.c. Dwellinas Not Mandatory #10/ # 10 #10/# 10 #10/#106"x6"- each way Garages Not Mandatory 6" x 6". #10/# 10 #10/# 10 6" x6" -#6/# 6 Subgrade Moisture 120% of Optimum 120% of Optimum 120% of Optimum 120% of Optimum Requirement at Moisture to 12" Moisture to 24" Timeef Optimum or Higher Below Slab and Moisture to 18" Below Below Slab and Moisture to 30" Below Construction Footing Slab and Footing Footing Slab and Footing Structural designs may require slab thickness and/or reinforcement greater than recommended herein. It is recommended that adequate reinforcement be provided to minimize development of shrinkage cracks. Slabs-on-grade should be underlain by 10-mil Visqueen (or equivalent) moisture barrier. To help break capillary rise of soil moisture, to aid concrete curing, and to prevent puncture, we recommend that at least two (2) inches of clean sand be placed above and under the moisture barrier. Joints in the moisture barrier should be lapped a minimum of six (6) inches and properly sealed. Slabs-on-grade subgrade soils must be firm and uniform. All loose or disturbed soils including under slab utility trench backfill should be recompacted prior to the placement of clean sand base underneath the moisture barrier. Joints for concrete slabs-on-grade must be carefully designed. Joint spacing is dependent upon slab thickness and concrete properties and should be selected by the structural engineer. Joints should be properly sealed. Unless local conditions and concrete properties indicate otherwise, the joint spacing (in feet) should not exceed approximately twice the slab thickness (in inches), Joint spacing may be increased if slabs are heavily reinforced. During hot weather, the contractor should take appropriate curing precautions after placement of concrete to minimize cracking of the slabs. The potential for slab cracking may be lessened by the addition of fiber mesh to the concrete, andlor control of waterlcement ratio. Concrete should be cured by protecting it against loss of moisture and rapid temperature changes for at least seven (7) days after placement. Moist curing, waterproof paper, white polyethylene sheeting, white liquid membrane compound, or a combination thereof, may be used after finishing operations have been ~ W Converse Consullants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\2001 \81\01.265\01265.30.asb \ ~ . I. I I I . I I . I I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 13 completed. The edges of concrete slabs exposed after removal of forms should be immediately protected to provide continuous curing. Recommendations regarding garage grade beams at door openings for various expansion potential conditions are also included in Table No.1, Suggested Guidelines For Design and Construction of Foundations and Slabs-on-Grade for One- and Two- story Residential Buildings. 8.3 Seismic Design Parameters In accordance with UBC (1997) Table 16-J, the geologic subgrade classification for the site is Sc. The site coefficients are: . Seismic Source Classification = Type B . Na =1.2, Ca= 0.48 . Nv= 1.5, Cv= 0.82 8.4 Flexible Pavement Sections An analysis was performed to evaluate structural sections for asphalt concrete pavements corresponding to Traffic Indices (Tis) of 5 and 6 and R-values of 12 and 14 obtained from laboratory testing of representative bulk soil samples. The analysis was based on Caltrans' design procedure for flexible pavement structures without the recommended safety factor of 0.20 feet, when evaluating the required Gravel Equivalent (GE) of the Asphalt Concrete (AC). City of Temecula minimum pavement sections where also applied where applicable. The results of our analysis are summarized in the following table. Table No.2, Recommended Pavement Sections '. . .; .",,' , , " '.>..' " '. . . .. . ,', '. ",Pav~me~t l;l....~tion', . , , , ., ,,-'" '. " ,....',.. '.'" , _ ..' i' 'J. ~ . Street S9ction~, . , . R:Value . "Traffichidex.(TJ:)i' i. AG,(inch), ..' .)AB;(incti): ....'0_ '.-;,.,;.:.....:.,...... . ," .-. .... Rothenberg Drive, Lyles Drive, 5 3.0 8.5 Gronlund Court, Grandcolas Drive, 14 Click Court, Guadagno Drive 6 3.0 12.0 Garcia Way, Bradshaw Drive, Rivera 5 3.0 8.5 Drive, Dahl Drive, Macke Drive, Adams Ct., Bingham Dr., Beaven Ct., 12 Bodley Ct., Driscoll Ct., Beamer Ct., 6 3.0 12.5 Corrigan Ct., Burnett Way, Deila Way, Greene Clr. ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFiCEIJOBFi LE\200 1 181 101.265101265.30.asb \'\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As.Buill Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188-3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 1 4 Pavement subgrade should be prepared in accordance with Section 301 of the (SSPWC 1994). Prior to placement of base aggregate, at least 12 inches of subgrade soils should be excavated and replaced as compacted fill. The upper 12 inches of subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction as defined by ASTM Standard 01557-91 test method. Base materials should conform to Section 200-2.2, "Crushed Aggregate Base," of the current Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC) and should be placed in accordance with Section 301.2 of the SSPWC. Asphaltic concrete materials should conform with Section 203 of the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC) and should be placed in accordance with Section 302.5 of the SSPWC. Positive drainage should be provided away from all pavement areas to prevent seepage of surface and/or subsurface water into the pavement base and/or subgrade. 8.5 Concrete Walks, Driveways, Access Ramps, Curb and Gutter Except as modified herein, concrete walks, driveways, access ramps, curb and gutters should be constructed in accordance with Section 303-5, Concrete Curbs, Walks, Gutters, Cross-Gutters, Alley Intersections, Access Ramps, and Driveways, of the Standard Specifications for Public Works (SSPWC, 2000). At least the upper 12 inches of the subgrade soils under these structures should be scarified, moisture conditioned to slightly above optimum and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The subgrade soils under the driveways of various lots should be pre-soaked prior to pouring concrete in accordance with the recommendations provided for concrete slabs- on-grade in Section 9.2, Slabs-an-Grade. The thickness of driveways for passenger \ cars should be at least four (4) inches. Transverse control joints for driveways should be spaced not more than 10 feet apart. Driveways wider than 12 feet should be provided with longitudinal control joints. Concrete walks subjected to pedestrian and bicycle loading should be at least four (4) inches thick. Transverse joints should be spaced 15 feet or less and should be cut to a depth of one fourth the slab thickness. ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICEIJOBFI LE\2001 181 101.265101265.30.asb 20 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As.Buill Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 1 5 Positive drainage should be provided away from all driveways and sidewalks to prevent seepage of surface and/or subsurface water into the concrete base and/or subgrade. 8.6 Corrosion Protection Based on the corrosion laboratory tests, subgrade soils within the subject tracts are not significantly deleterious to concrete. The soluble sulfate content of site soil can be categorized as negligible per UBC. Type I or II Portland Cement may be used in concrete construction. Standard concrete cover, that is 2.0 inches if placed against forms and 3,0 inches if placed directly against earth, may be used to protect reinforcing bars. Site soils are classified as corrosive to ferrous metal. If additional corrosion recommendations are desired, we recommend that a qualified corrosion specialist be contacted. 8.7 Site Drainage, Slope Protection, Recommendations and Landscape ~rigation Future homeowners should be informed regarding the importance of maintaining a constant level of soil moisture. Homeowners should be made aware of the potential negative consequences of both excessive watering, as well as allowing expansive soils to become too dry. Improperly designed, constructed or maintained planters often pond water and cause deep moisture penetration and soil moisture change. Placement of planters adjacent to foundations or other sensitive hardscape, such as pools and spas, should be conducted with proper maintenance. If adequate or proper maintenance of irrigation and drainage is not performed by the homeowner, some degree of foundation/slab movement may be expected and cause stucco cracking or dry wall separation. Adequate drainage should be provided away from the structures to prevent ponding and to reduce percolation of water into structural fill. A desirable slope for surface drain and adequate positive drainage away from structures should be provided to prevent ponding and to reduce percolation of water into subgrade andlor other structural fills. Building pad drainage should satisfy the requirements of Section 3315, Drainage and Terracing, of the UBC (1997). Planters and landscaped areas adjacent to the building perimeter should be designed to minimize water infiltration into the subgrade soils. Gutters and downspouts should be installed on the roofs, and runoffs should be directed to storm drains through non-erosive devices. ~ ~ Converse Consultants eel ENTlOFFICEIJOBFI LE\200 1 181 101-265101265-30.asb 2.\ I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I As.Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 1 6 Subdrains were installed at fill/bedrock contacts in the major swales to collect and transport infiltrating groundwater from rainfall and/or landscape irrigation and other sources at locations deemed necessary by Converse based on observations made during grading. The presence of relatively permeable fill soils and weathered bedrock materials over less permeable bedrock materials within the Pauba Formation bedrock can "perch" trapping infiltrating water at the contacts and result in saturated conditions in areas away from subdrains. Subdrains were installed as depicted on the enclosed Drawings No. 1 through 7, Field Density Test Locations. The subdrains were 6 inches in diameter and discharge to a suitable non-erosive drainage device. It is recommended that all slopes be planted with drought-tolerant, ground cover vegetation as soon as practical to protect against erosion by reducing runoff velocity. Deep-rooted vegetation should also be established to provide resistance to surficial slumping. Over-steepening of existing slopes should be avoided during fine grading and construction. Slopes should be provided with adequate erosion control measures as soon as possible. Erosion control may include planting the slopes with appropriate drought- resistant vegetation as recommended by a landscape architect. Landscaping should disturb the soils as little as possible. Care should be exercised to prevent loose fills from being placed on slopes during construction and landscaping. Slopes should not be over-irrigated, as this can soften the near surface soil resulting in surficial slope failures. Rodent burrows, small concentrations of uncontrolled surface/subsurface water, or localized depression of utility trench backfill on slopes should be controlled andlor repaired as soon as possible. Most hillside residential lot problems are associated with water. Homeowners should be aware that altering drainage patterns, landscaping and the addition of patios, planters and other improvements, broken pipes, as well as irrigation and variations in seasonal rainfall, all affects moisture conditions of the subgrade soils. Excessive landscape irrigation may significantly increase the subgrade soil moisture conditions resulting in localized ponding and saturation of the subsurface soils. Percolating groundwater may even flow from upper-grade lot areas to adjacent lower-grade lot areas. Excessive soil moisture affects performance of buildings and other structures, slopes and pavements, as well as landscaping. Homeowners should consult a professional landscape architect for planting and irrigation recommendations. Local drainage collection and transporting devices such as subdrains may be required if saturated conditions develop in the future. ~ W Converse Consultants -z;z.. CCI ENTlOFFICEIJOBFI LE\2001 181 \01.26510 1265.30.asb I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 17 Modifications to the graded pad areas should not be attempted without the approval of a qualified soils engineer andlor geologist. 9.0 CONCLUSIONS . Based on our field observation, in-place density and laboratory testing, and data analysis and interpretation, it is our opinion that earthwork associated with the grading of the subject lots within the Tracts 24188, 24188-2, and 24188-3 were completed in substantial compliance with the project plans and specifications. . Excavated site soils were placed as compacted fills. The fill soils were composed primarily of sands, silty and clayey sands and silt. . The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the fill soils ranged from 113.5 pound per cubic foot (pcf) to 133.5 pcf, and 8.0 percent to 14.0 percent, respectively. . Fill slopes have been graded at 2:1 H:V or flatter, and are considered to be grossly stable under static as well as anticipated seismic loading conditions. . All cut slopes were over-excavated and replaced by compacted fill. . Some surficial erosion may occur on slopes prior to the establishment of vegetation, particularly where there are primary sands with little of no fines at the surface. . Evidence of active or potentially active faulting was not observed during grading of the site. . Single and multi-family residential structures may be supported on continuous andlor isolated spread footings. 10.0 LIMITATIONS The findings, conclusions, recommendations and opinions contained in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering and engineering geologic principles and practice within our profession in effect at this time in Southern California. Our conclusions and recommendations are based on field observation, field and laboratory testing performed in accordance with applicable ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICEIJOBFILE\200 1 181 101.265101265.30.asb 23 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As.Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 1 8 industry standards, data analysis/interpretation and our experience. We make no other warranty, either expressed or implied. Our field density testing to evaluate fill compaction was performed at random and discrete locations, and at various time intervals during the fill placement operations. Our test results are considered to be representative of the locations and materials tested within the compacted fill. Some variations in the densities and moisture of the compacted fills at other locations should be expected. This report presents our opinion formed as a result of our observations of fill placement. We have relied on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compaction efforts and moisture to the fill to meet the project specifications. The tests were performed on compacted fill in accordance with ASTM Standards to calibrate our observer's judgment, and to provide data on the overall compactive efforts. Although the graded lots are considered suitable for construction at the time of completion, natural weathering and degradation of the near-surface soils may occur with time. It has been our experience that significant deterioration of surficial soils, in particular growth of vegetation and erosion, may occur if a significant period of time elapses before construction. We recommend that the conditions of impacted lots, if any, be re-evaluated by Converse prior to construction. ~ W Converse Consultants CCI ENTlOFFICEIJOBFI LE\2001 181 101-265101265.30 .asb 2i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I As.Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Soi Master Planned Community Temecula, California March 6, 2003 Page 1 9 11.0 REFERENCES "Geotechnical Investigation Report, Tracts 24136, 24187, 24188, and 25418, Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community, City of Temecula, California", prepared by Converse Consultants, dated May 6, 1999. Annual Book Of ASTM Standards (2001), Vol. 04.08, Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics. International Building Code, Uniform Building Code (UBC, 1997). Standard Specifications For Public Works Construction (2000), Building News, Inc., Los Angeles, California. ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFF ICEIJOBFI LE\2001 181 101.265101265.30 .asb 25' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS 2' I I . Table No..A-1, Field Density Test Results .' . . Comp- Test TeSt t~ocatr()fl Tract Approx. Test; Appro~.F!U pry Moist. Soli Remarks No. Date:' I. No. Etev. Below Test Pemslty Content Type :action (90.% Req.uniO$S noted) (It) (It) (pc!) (%) (%) , GRAPiNG 1 07/23/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, LOT 6 24188.3 1215 BTM 105.9 9.6 2 93 2 07/23/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, LOT 4 24188-3 1211 BTM 105.0 12.4 2 92 3 07/23/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, LOT 6 24188.3 1213 3 118.6 8.2 1 93 4 07/23/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, LOT 4 24188-3 1215 4 117.1 9.0 1 92 5 07/23/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, LOT 3 24188-3 1219 1 119.6 10.4 1 93 6 07/23/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, LOT 5 24188.3 1217 6 123.4 8.7 1 96 7 07124/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1219 2 123.0 10.3 1 96 LOT 7 8 07/24/02 lOT 3 24188-3 1225 BTM 107.1 10.0 2 94 9 07/24/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1226 8 120.6 12.2 1 94 LOT 3 10 07/24/02 LOT 6 2418B.3 1223 BTM 97.B 19.5 2 85 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 11 07/24/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1222 7 121.6 10.0 1 95 LOT 6 12 07/24/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 2418B-3 1223 B "122.6 10.3 1 96 LOT 6 13 07/24/02 LOT 2 24188.3 1229 2 117.1 14.0 3 96 14 07/24/02 LOT 2 24188-3 1230 3 115.1 15.6 3 94 95% Req., Failed, See RT #14A 14A 07/24/02 LOT 2 24188.3 1230 3 116.4 14.1 3 95 95% Req., RT of #14 15 07/24/02 LOT 6 24188-3 1225 10 116.9 6.6 1 91 16 07/24102 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 2418B-3 1226 11 113.3 7.1 1 89 Failed, See RT #16A LOT 6 16A 07/24/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1226 11 117.2 10.2 1 92 RT of #16 LOT 6 17 07/24/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1225 14 117.0 6.8 1 91 LOT 7 18 07/24/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 2418B.3 1224 15 115.7 7.0 1 90 LOT 7 19 07/24/02 LOT 6 24188-3 1220 2 122.5 7.3 1 96 95% Req. 20 07/24/02 LOT 6 24188-3 1222 4 109.2 12.0 2 95 95% Aeq. 21 07/25/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1226 4 115.6 10. f 1 90 22 07/25/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1227 6 117.1 12.7 1 92 23 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1229 1B 123.4 6.1 1 96 LOT 7 24 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1230 19 122.2 7.4 1 96 LOT 7 25 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1222 4 121.2 9.9 1 95 LOT 7 26 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, 8ELOW 24188-3 1226 5 125.0 10.1 1 98 LOT 7 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 1 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2-1 Converse Consultants CCIENTiOFFICEIJOBFJlE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188Jdl I I . TablllNo. A-1., Field [)ensity Test Results - . Test location Tract ApprQX. rll$t ApprQx. Fill pry Moist. SelIl Camp- Remarko Pate: Elev; Below Test Oenslty COtitent Type action (90% Req.llnl~nO~) No, (It) lit) (pel) ('!>) (%) 27 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1215 BTM 9B.3 19.5 2 B6 Native Bottom, 85% LOT 33 Req, 2B 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1215 BTM 117.1 9.1 1 92 lOT 32 29 07/25/02 LOT 33 24188.3 1209 BTM 114.6 12.2 1 90 30 07/25/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1230 5 123.1 8.B 1 96 31 07/25/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1231 6 122.1 12.1 1 96 32 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1226 7 112.3 B.6 1 BB 95% Req., Failed, LOT 6 See RT #32A 32A 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1226 7 123.7 B.2 1 97 95% Req., RT of #32 LOT 6 33 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1225 6 115.3 10.7 1 91 95% Req., Failed, lOT 5 See RT #33A 33A 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1225 6 122.9 9.0 1 96 95% Req., RT of #33 LOT 5 34 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1212 3 115.2 12.2 1 90 LOT 33 35 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1215 4 117.9 7.2 1 92 LOT 33 36 07/25/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188 1213 6 l1B.3 10.4 1 92 LOT 63 37 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1219 19 119.1 B.5 1 93 LOT 32 3B 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1221 21 118.5 7.B 1 93 LOT 32 39 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1223 B 124.0 9.0 1 97 LOT 33 40 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1225 10 123.3 B.4 1 96 LOT 33 41 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1229 4 122.9 9.6 1 96 LOT 32 42 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1231 6 110.7 8.9 1 B7 95% Req., Failed, LOT 32 See RT #42A 42A 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1231 6 123.5 8.0 1 97 95% Req., RT of #42 LOT 32 43 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1232 21 124.2 8.7 7 94 LOT 7 44 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1234 23 120.0 9.3 7 91 LOT 7 45 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 122B 17 116.1 9.2 1 91 LOT 5 46 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1229 19 117.3 10.3 1 92 LOT 5 47 07/26/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1231 7 122.8 9.4 7 93 LOT 2 4B 07/29/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1230 16 124.2 9.1 1 97 LOT 33 49 07/29/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1231 15 124.2 9.3 1 97 LOT 33 50 07/29/02 LOT 6 24188-3 1230 9 121.5 6.8 1 95 51 07/29/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1249 13 117.8 10.2 1 92 LOT 1 52 07/29/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1250 12 l1B.5 9.2 1 93 LOT 1 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I z.g, Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFILEI1999\81\99-112199112-53.tr24188.fdt I I Table No. A'1, Field bensity TestResults . . Appro~. Test Appro.. Fill pry !ilolst. Corm'" Test Test LOcation :Ti'act Soli Remarks No. P.te EI~v. Below:Test DEm~lty Content Type action (90%Req. unless noted) No. 1ft) . (ft) 1Pc!) 1%) (%) 53 07/29/02 LOT 97 24188-3 1253 8TM 119.5 7.3 1 93 54 07/29102 LOT 60 24188-3 1237 8TM 108.3 11.7 3 90 55 07/30102 LOT 1 24188-3 1246 3 111.1 11.4 3 92 95% Req., Failed, See AT #55A 55A 07/30/02 LOT 1 24188-3 1246 3 116.6 12.6 3 96 95% Req., RT of #55 56 07/30/02 LOT 1 24188.3 1246 3 110.4 11.2 3 91 95% Req., Failed, See RT #56A 56A 07130102 LOT 1 24188.3 1246 3 115.7 12.2 3 96 95% Req., RT of #56 57 07/30/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1234 3 120.0 10.7 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #57 A 57A 07/30102 LOT 5 24188.3 1234 3 121.5 11.7 1 95 95% Req., RT of #57 58 07/30102 LOT 5 24188-3 1239 3 113.4 14.3 3 94 95% Req., Failed, See RT #58A 58A 07/30/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1234 3 116.3 12.8 3 96 95% Req., AT of #58 59 07/30/02 LOT 59 24188-3 1238 2 116.2 11.1 1 91 95 % Req., Failed, See RT #59A 59A 07/30102 LOT 59 24188.3 1238 2 123.1 9.8 1 96 95% Req., AT of #59 60 07/30/02 LOT 5 24188.3 1234 8 116.0 15.4 1 91 95% Req. Failed, See AT #6DA 60A 07/30102 LOT 5 24188.3 1234 8 123.4 11.1 1 96 RT of #60 61 07/30/02 lOT 5 24188-3 1234 8 117.4 11.0 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT of #61A 61A 07/30/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1238 8 121.6 10.0 1 95 95% Req., RT of #61 62 07/30/02 LOT 33 24188.3 1229 16 119.9 8.3 1 94 63 07/30/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1229 16 120.9 9.7 1 94 64 07/30/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, 24188.3 1223 16 111.0 7.8 1 87 Failed, See RT #64A LOT 33 64A 07/30/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, 24188-3 1223 16 115.8 9.8 1 91 RT of #64 LOT 33 65 07/30/02 LOT 33 24188.3 1223 17 109.8 8.7 1 86 Failed, See RT #65A 65A 07130/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1223 17 114.9 9.6 1 90 RT of #65 66 07130/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1240 10 119.2 9.1 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #66A 66A 07/30102 LOT 3 24188-3 1240 10 123.3 9.2 1 96 95% Req., RT of #66 67 07/30/02 LOT 3 24188-3 1239 9 118.0 9.8 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT #67 A 67A 07/30/02 lOT 3 24188-3 1239 9 123.4 9.6 1 96 95% Req., RT of #67 68 07/30/02 lOT 6 24188-3 1238 14 120.9 9.9 7 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT #68A 68A 07/30/02 lOT 6 24188-3 1238 14 123.1 9.0 1 96 95% Req., RT of #68 69 07/30/02 lOT 6 24188-3 1237 13 118.3 9.0 7 90 95% Req., Failed, See RT #69A Field Dens~y Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6. 2003 Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.1\ Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdl I I I I Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results I. . Appro.. Test Appro.. Fill PlY Moist. Camp.; Test Test Location Tract Soli Remarks No. Date ~ No,. Elev. Below Test Pensity Content .; Type action' (M% Req.unless noted) .. (It) (ft) (J><:!) ('!o) (%) 69A 07/30/02 LOT 6 24188-3 1237 13 125.5 8.2 7 95 95% Aeq., RT of #69 70 07/30/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1239 38 122.8 8.8 7 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #70A 70A 07/30/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1239 38 126.0 9.4 7 96 95% Req., AT of #70 71 07/30/02 LOT 5 24188.3 1238 37 123.8 9.2 7 94 95 % Req., Failed, See RT #71A 71A 07/30/02 LOT 5 24188.3 1238 37 127.3 7.0 7 96 95% Req" AT of #71 72 07/30/02 LOT 32 24188-3 1231 4 118.4 9.3 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #72A 72A 07/30/02 LOT 32 24188.3 1231 4 123.6 8.9 1 97 95% Req., RT of #72 73 07/30/02 LOT 32 24188.3 1230 3 117.5 8.6 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT #73A 73A 07/30/02 LOT 32 24188-3 1230 3 123.8 9.2 1 97 95% Req., RT of #73 74 07/30/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1229 4 118.1 9.0 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT #74A 74A 07/30/02 LOT 33 24188.3 1229 4 123.7 8.2 1 97 95% Req., RT of #74 75 07/30/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1228 3 119.6 8.9 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #75A 75A 07/30/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1228 3 124.3 7.9 1 97 95% Req., RT of #75 76 07/30/02 LOT 6 24188.3 1238 6 125.6 9.0 7 95 77 07/30/02 LOT 6 24188-3 1239 5 125.9 9.8 7 95 7B 07/30/02 LOT 1 24188-3 1241 4 123.6 8.6 1 97 79 07/30/02 lOT 1 24188.3 1242 5 122.0 9.3 1 95 80 07/31/02 LOT 1 24188-3 1251 12 119.2 8.0 12 93 81 07131/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1250 26 116.5 13.4 12 91 82 07/31/02 LOT 59 24188-3 1240 4 118.0 10.5 12 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT #a2A B2A 07/31/02 LOT 59 24188.3 1240 4 119.2 9.8 4 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #82B 82B 07/31/02 LOT 59 24188.3 1240 4 121.3 9.6 4 95 95% Req., RT of #82A 83 07/31/02 LOT 2 24188-3 1251 20 119.8 12.4 12 94 84 07/31/02 LOT 58 24188-3 1238 3 121.7 12.4 12 95 85 07/31/02 LOT 55 24188-3 1248 3 120.8 10.5 12 95 86 07/31/02 LOT 61 24188-3 1249 3 118.8 10.8 12 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #86A 86A 07/31/02 LOT 61 24188.3 1249 3 121.0 9.8 4 95 95% Req., AT of 1/86 87 07/31/02 LOT 63 24188-3 1251 BTM 116.6 10.3 1 91 88 07/31/02 LOT 57 24188-3 1233 BTM 115.1 9.8 1 90 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CC!ENT\OFFJCEIJOBFILEI1999\B 1 199.112\99112-53.tr2418B.fdl 3c I I Table No. )1.-1,. Fielll Density Test Results . Approx. TO$! Approx.flll Dry Moist. Corol> TO$! Test, LocatlQn Tract SOli Remarks No. Date No. Elev. BelowT,st Pensl\)' Content Ty.pe action (00% Req. unless noted) . (ft) (It) (pC!) (%) (%) 89 07/31/02 ROTHERNBERG DR., 24188.3 1245 11 123.3 10.6 1 96 STA 12+80 90 07/31/02 ROTH ERN BERG DR., 24188.3 1246 12 123.3 11.9 1 96 STA 12+85 91 07/31/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188-3 1242 12 122.0 11.9 1 95 STA 10+90 92 07/31/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188.3 1243 13 122.7 I1.S 1 96 STA 10+93 93 08/01/02 LOT 32 24188.3 1241 12 120.5 8.3 1 94 94 08/01/02 LOT 32 24188.3 1240 13 120.6 8.0 1 94 95 08/01/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1239 9 121.4 8.0 1 94 96 08/01/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1238 8 117.7 9.4 1 92 97 08/01/02 LOT 34 24188-3 1234 9 114.4 11.2 1 89 Failed, See RT #97 A 97A 08/01/02 LOT 34 24188-3 1234 9 126.0 7.0 6 95 RT of /t97A 98 08/01/02 LOT 34 24188.3 1235 10 115.6 8.1 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See AT It 98A 98A 08/01/02 LOT 34 24188-3 1235 10 126.3 7.4 6 95 95% Req., RT of #98 Tests No. 99, 100, and 101 were not used 104 08/01/02 LOT 60 24188-3 1250 10 125.4 9.5 5 96 105 08/01/02 LOT 60 24188.3 1249 9 121.5 11.0 12 95 106 08/01/02 LOT 58 24188.3 1248 8 121.0 12.5 12 95 107 08/01/02 LOT 58 24188.3 1248 8 124.8 9.4 5 96 108 08/01/02 LOT 60 24188.3 1250 5 122.9 10.6 1 96 109 08/01/02 LOT 60 24188.3 1250 5 122.9 9.8 1 96 110 08/01/02 LOT 62 24188.3 1252 3 124.1 9.3 5 95 111 08/01/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1253 3 122.3 8.6 1 96 112 08/01/02 LOT 57 24188-3 1251 19 124.3 9.6 5 95 113 08/01/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1251 19 121.6 9.8 1 95 114 08/01/02 LOT 31 24188-3 1244 7 110.1 7.9 1 86 Failed, See AT #114A 114A 08/01/02 LOT 31 24188-3 1244 7 123.6 8.4 1 97 RTof#114 115 08/02/02 LOT 31 24188-3 1243 6 111.3 10.0 1 87 Failed, See RT #115A 115A 08/02/02 LOT 31 24188-3 1243 6 122.5 8.4 1 96 RTof#115 116 08/02/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1038 11 115.1 8.9 1 90 95% Req., Failed, LOT 32 See RT #116A 116A 08/02/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1038 11 121.7 9.0 1 95 95% Req., RT of #116 LOT 32 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 5 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I ,I 3\ Converse Consultants CCIENl\OFFICEIJOBfILE\ 1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdl I I Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Rll$Ults . Appro.. TO$! ApI"Olt,FIII PrY Mo,>I. Camp- I. TO$! Test Location Tract son Remarks No. Date No; Elev; Below Test Deosl'-Y Content Type action (90% Req. UI1IE!Ss rioted) (It) (It) (pel) (%) (%) 117 08/02/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188-3 1037 10 110.6 9.4 1 86 Failed, See RT #117A LOT 32 117A 08/02/02 CHANNEL SLOPE, BELOW 24188.3 1037 10 123.5 8.8 1 97 RTof#117 LOT 32 118 08/02/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1240 15 122.1 9.3 6 92 119 08/02/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1241 16 121.8 8.5 6 92 120 08/02/02 LOT 34 24188.3 1236 6 127.0 7.5 6 96 121 08/02/02 LOT 56 24188.3 1239 4 117.6 8.4 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT#121A 121A 08/02/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1239 4 121.1 9.7 1 95 95% Req., RT of #121 122 08/02/02 LOT 56 24188.3 1239 4 116.5 7.7 1 91 95 % Req., Failed, See RT #122A 122A 08/02/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1239 4 122.1 8.0 1 95 95% Req., RT of #122 123 08/02/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188.3 1238 8 118.6 8.9 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See STA 12+00 RT #123A 123A 08/02/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188.3 1238 8 121.6 10.0 1 95 95% Req., RT of #123 STA12+00 124 08/02/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188-3 1238 8 117.9 9.2 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See STA 12+05 RT #124A 124A 08/02/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188-3 1238 8 122.1 9.7 1 95 95% Req., RT of #124 STA 12+05 125 08/02/02 LOT 54 24188-3 1234 8TM 124.1 9.9 5 95 126 08/02/02 LOT 54 24188-3 1235 1 118.9 11.7 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT#126A 126A 08/02/02 LOT 54 24188.3 1235 1 121.7 10.6 1 95 95% Req., RT of #126 127 08/02/02 LOT 11 24188-3 1239 4 121.0 10.2 1 95 128 08/02/02 LOT 11 24188-3 1239 5 121.4 10.4 1 95 129 08/02/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188-3 1240 5 124.6 10.3 5 95 STA 12+00 130 08/02/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188-3 1240 5 121.6 12.0 1 95 STA 12+00 131 08/05/02 ROTHEN8ERG DR. 24188-3 1239 15 121.0 10.9 1 95 132 08/05/02 ROTHEN8ERG DR. 24188-3 1240 16 122.4 11.1 1 96 133 08/05/02 LOT 58 24188-3 1254 21 123.7 10.5 1 97 134 08/05/02 LOT 58 24188.3 1255 22 123.6 9.5 1 97 135 08/05/02 LOT 61 24188.3 1258 25 115.3 8.0 1 90 136 08/05/02 LOT 61 24188-3 1257 24 116.4 9.5 1 91 137 08/05/02 LYLES OR. 24188-3 1241 2 121.0 7.8 1 95 138 08/05/02 LYLES OR. 24188-3 1240 2 122.3 8.9 1 96 139 08/05/02 LOT 4 24188-3 1240 8 122.2 7.8 1 96 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 6 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I :/l- Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFJCE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I II I . . Tallie NQ. A-1, FieldOensity Test Resul.ts . Approx. Tesl Approx. Fill Dry MOl$!. CamP'" Test T~t location Tract Elev~ BelOW-Test Deoslly Content SOli. 'action Remarks No. Date No. (ft) 1ft) (pol) ('!oj TYpe ('!oj (90% Req. unless noted 140 08/05/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1250 26 121.6 7.5 1 95 141 08/05/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1242 2 117.7 6.9 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT #141A 141A 08/05/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1242 2 121.0 8.0 1 95 95% Req" RT of #141 142 08/05/02 LOT 58 24188-3 1248 5 116.3 6.0 1 91 95% Req., Failed, See RT #142A 142A 08/05/02 LOT 58 24188.3 1248 5 121.8 8.9 1 95 RTofH142 143 08/05/02 LYLES DR. 24188-3 1244 2 121.5 9.2 1 95 144 08/05/02 LYLES DR. 24188-3 1244 2 122.1 8.7 1 95 145 08/06/02 ROTHEN8ERG DR., 24188-3 1243 4 110.0 15.6 2 96 95 % Req. LOT 59 146 08/06/02 LOTS 60 & 61 24188-3 1250 BTM 121.1 9.3 1 95 95% Req. 147 08/06/02 LOT 1 & 2 24188.3 1256 22 119.1 9.2 1 93 148 08/06/02 LOT 5 24188.3 1250 30 113.3 9.B 3 94 149 08/06/02 LOTS 6 & 7 24188-3 1248 23 113.3 10.4 3 94 150 08/06/02 LOT 7 24188.3 1246 15 114.0 14.6 2 99 95% Req. 151 08/06/02 LOT 4 24188-3 1253 29 116.5 8.1 1 91 152 08/06/02 LOT 2 24188-3 1244 13 114.1 13.6 2 99 95% Req. 153 08/06/02 lOT 1 24188-3 1246 5 121.5 9.8 1 95 95% Req. 154 08/06/02 LOT 6 24188-3 1248 25 116.6 12.6 3 96 95% Req. 155 08/06/02 LOT 3 24188-3 1257 22 119.3 11.8 3 99 156 08/06/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1256 25 117.1 12.7 3 97 157 08/06/02 LOT 7 24188-3 1239 4 119.5 7.6 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RTof#157A 157A 08/06/02 LOT 7 24188.3 1239 4 122.5 8.0 1 96 95% Req., RT of #157 158 08/06/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1246 13 121.3 7.4 1 95 159 08/06/02 GRAND COLAS DR. 24188-3 1242 7 115.2 11.9 3 95 160 08/06/02 GRAND COLAS DR. 24188.3 1244 9 115.6 11.1 3 96 161 08/06/02 LOT 10 24188-3 1240 7 121.8 7.9 1 95 162 08/06/02 LOT 10 24188-3 1241 8 115.8 11.8 3 96 163 08/06/02 LOT 62 24188 1224 2 123.4 8.1 1 96 164 08/06/02 LOT 62 24188 1228 6 123.3 10.0 1 96 165 08/07/02 LOT 62 24188 1232 10 110.5 17.6 2 97 Field Dens~y Tables Newland Homes Tracl24188 March 6, 2003 Page 7 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 33 Converse Consuttants CCIEN1\OFFICEIJOBFllE\ 1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 2418a March 6, 2003 Page 8 I Table No.. A~1. Field Density Test Results Comp- . Test Test Location Tract Approx. Test Approx. FlU Dry Moist Soil Remarks No. Date .. No. Elev. Below Test Density Content Typo action (90% Req.unl8Snoted) (It) (It) (pel) ('Yo) ('Yo) 166 08/07/02 LOT 62 24188 1234 12 117.1 7.0 3 97 167 08/07/02 lOT 35 24188.3 1234 BTM 118.1 9.8 3 98 168 08/07/02 LOT 63 24188 1235 9 108.2 17.1 2 95 169 08/07/02 LOT 63 24188 1237 11 119.9 9.6 3 99 170 08/07/02 LOT 2 24188.3 1253 22 112.3 11.2 3 93 171 08/07/02 LOT 2 24188-3 1255 24 115.9 7.2 1 91 172 08/07/02 LOT 32 24188.3 1245 21 121.1 11.0 1 95 173 08/07/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1247 28 121.2 9.8 1 95 174 08/07/02 lOT 100 24188-3 1257 6 119.5 14.7 3 99 175 08/07/02 LOT 98 24188.3 1258 9 122.8 10.1 1 96 176 08/07/02 LOT 31 24188.3 1242 8TM 121.9 8.5 1 95 95% Req. 177 08/07/02 LOT 31 24188-3 1244 2 122.3 8.4 1 96 95% Req. 178 08/07/02 ROTHENBER DR., 24188.3 1240 5 123.5 8.0 1 97 95% Req. STA 10+00 179 08/07/02 ROTHENBERG DR., STA 24188.3 1242 7 122.8 7.5 1 96 95% Req. 10+00 - . 180 08/07/02 AIVE.RA DR., STA 10+10 24188-3 1242 BTM 124.1 10.4 1 97 95% Req. 181 08/07/02 RIVERA DR., STA 10+10 24188.3 1244 2 126.4 10.7 6 95 95% Req. 182 08/07/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1251 20 127.8 7.9 6 96 95% Req. 183 08/07/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1253 22 127.2 9.0 6 96 184 08107/02 LYLES DR., FRONT OF 24188.3 1247 8 112.0 9.9 3 93 LOT 59 185 08/07/02 LYLES DR., FRONT OF 24188.3 1247 8 109.3 9.7 3 90 LOT 59 186 08/07/02 LYLES DR., FRONT OF 24188-3 1254 3 115.6 14.1 3 96 LOT 61 187 08/07/02 LYLES DR., FRONT OF 24188.3 1254 3 115.5 13.4 3 96 LOT 61 188 08/08/02 LOT 59 24188-3 1251 14 109.1 15.9 2 95 95% Req. 189 08/08/02 LOT 59 24188-3 1253 16 106.0 17.1 2 93 95% Req.. Failed, See RT #189A 189A 08/08/02 LOT 59 24188-3 1253 16 108.8 15.0 2 95 95% Req., RT of #189 190 08/08/02 LOT 99 24188.3 1257 7 124.3 10.8 1 97 95% Req. 191 08/08/02 LOT 99 24188.3 1259 9 117.9 9.5 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT #191A 191A 08/08/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1259 9 122.5 9.0 1 96 95% Req., RT of #191 192 08/08/02 GRAND COLAS OR., 24188-3 1247 7 120.4 12.5 1 94 STA 10+50 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt ~ I I. I .~. ~ . Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results Test Test Location- Tract APpro". Test Approx. Fill Dry MOl,t. SOli Comp- Remarks No. Date No. Elev. 8elow Test Density Content Typ~ action (90% Req.unl~ noted) . (It) (It) (pel) (\'0) (%) 193 08/08/02 GRAND COLAS DR.. 24188.3 1249 9 110.2 13.5 2 96 95% Req. STA 10+50 194 08/08/02 LOT 54 24188.3 1249 8 118.7 13.0 3 98 95% Req. 195 08/08/02 LOT 54 24188~3 1251 10 121.6 13.1 1 95 95% Req. 196 08/08/02 LOT 10 24188.3 1246 19 121.2 8.7 1 95 95% Req. 197 08/08/02 LOT 11 24188~3 1248 21 121.8 8.5 1 95 95% Req. 198 08/08102 LOT 55 24188~3 1249 9 117.8 12.0 3 97 95% Req. 199 08/08/02 lOT 55 24188.3 1252 12 116.7 9.1 3 96 95% Req. 200 08/08/02 LOT 61 24188 1236 5 114.3 11.5 3 95 201 08/08/02 LOT 61 24188 1236 6 115.2 11.2 3 95 202 08/08/02 LOT 1 24188.3 1257 23 121.0 10.8 1 95 203 08/08/02 LOT 1 24188~3 1259 25 121.7 11.7 1 95 204 08/08/02 LOT 5 24188.3 1254 23 122.6 9.2 1 96 205 08/08/02 LOT 5 24188.3 1256 25 121.8 9.1 1 95 206 08/08/02 LOT 31 24188~3 1245 2 125.6 7.3 6 95 207 08/08/02 LOT 31 24188~3 1247 4 126.0 7.5 6 95 208 08/08/02 LOT 52 24188~3 1245 8TM 117.5 11.5 3 97 209 08/08/02 LOT 65 24188~3 1259 8TM 121.4 10.7 1 95 210 08/09/02 LOT 58 24188~3 1251 16 117.7 10.9 1 92 211 08109102 LOT 58 24188.3 1252 17 118.3 10.5 1 92 212 08/09/02 LOT 57 24188.3 1253 20 116.4 13.0 3 96 213 08/09/02 LOT 57 24188~3 1254 21 116.8 13.1 3 97 214 08/09/02 LOT 54 24188~3 1254 13 121.4 10.6 1 95 215 08/09102 LOT 52 24188~3 1252 7 118.5 10.7 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #215A 215A 08109/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1252 7 121.7 10.1 1 95 95% Req., RT of #215 216 08/09/02 LOT 53 24188~3 1254 2 122.3 9.8 1 96 217 08/09/02 LOT 53 24188~3 1254 3 121.9 9.3 1 95 218 08/09/02 LOT 54 24188~3 1256 15 114.4 13.9 3 95 95% Req. 219 08/09/02 LOT 54 24188~3 1258 17 122.0 10.9 1 95 95% Req. 220 08/09/02 LOT 5 24188.3 1252 27 119.6 8.1 1 93 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 9 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I . I I I I I I 3$' Converse Consultants CC1ENT\OFFICEIJOBFILE\1 999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdl I' I :r"ble No. A-t, Field Density Test Results Test Test Locathm Tract Approx. Test Approx.FIII Dry Moist Soli Com".. Remarks No. Date Elev~ Below Test Density Content Type action (90% Req. unless noted) No. (ft) (It) (pel) (%) (%) 221 08/09/02 LOT 5 24188.3 1254 29 122.3 8.9 1 96 222 08/09/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1263 13 122.7 8.6 1 96 95% Req. 223 08/09/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1265 15 121.5 11.7 1 95 95% Req. 224 08/09/02 LOT 52 24188-3 1254 9 123.6 9.6 1 97 95% Req. 225 08/09/02 LOT 52 24188-3 1256 11 119.0 11.0 3 98 95% Req. 226 08/12/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1257 32 121.8 8.7 1 95 227 08/12/02 LOT 60 24188-3 1258 16 116.6 8.0 1 91 228 08/12/02 LOT 61 24188-3 1260 15 118.1 7.2 1 93 229 08/12/02 LOT 6 24188.3 1253 25 127.5 6.6 5 98 230 08/12/02 LOT 56 24188.3 1257 22 122.1 8.8 1 95 231 08/12/02 LOT 53 24188.3 1259 11 124.6 8.8 1 97 95% Req. 232 08/12/02 LOT 53 24188.3 1261 13 126.7 10.1 7 96 95% Req. 233 08/12/02 LOT 100 24188-3 1262 2 121.8 8.4 1 95 234 08/12/02 LOT 100 24188-3 1264 4 127.3 8.4 6 96 235 08/12/02 LOT 98 24188-3 1264 4 122.1 7.6 1 95 236 08/12/02 LOT 98 24188.3 1266 6 121.8 7.4 1 95 237 08/12/02 LOT 63 24188.3 1260 4 120.9 8.9 1 95 \ 238 08/12/02 LOT 63 24188.3 1262 6 123.1 7.0 1 96 239 08/12/02 LOT 29 24188.3 1246 8TM 118.3 3.6 6 89 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 240 08/12/02 GRAND COLAS DR., 24188.3 1237 8TM 120.5 7.0 6 91 LOTS 19 & 53 241 08/12/02 GLICK CT.. LOTS 12 & 19 24188.3 1232 8TM 125.4 9.8 6 94 242 08/13/02 LOT 97 24188.3 1264 4 117.2 11.0 1 92 243 08/13/02 LOT 97 24188-3 1266 6 112.9 9.0 3 93 244 08/13/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1262 4 117.2 10.0 1 92 245 08/13/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1264 6 121.4 9.2 7 92 246 08/13/02 LOT 3 24188-3 1259 34 118.5 9.8 1 93 247 08/13/02 LOT 54 24188-3 1262 20 114.9 13.2 3 95 248 08/13/02 LOT 57 24188-3 1261 24 118.9 9.8 1 93 249 08/13/02 LOT 57 24188.3 1263 26 116.8 7.6 1 91 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 10 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt ~ I I Table No. A.1, Field Density Test Results . Test Tl!$t Location Tract Appro:x.,.T~ Approx. FUI Dry Moist. Soli Camp'" Remarks No; Date E:lev. Below Test Density Content Typo action (90% Roq. unloss noted) No. 1ft) (ft) (pd) (%) ('1;) 250 08/13/02 LOT 4 24188.3 1261 21 112.7 10.5 3 93 251 08/13/02 LOT 4 24188-3 1263 23 113.5 11.3 3 93 252 08/13/02 LOT 98 24188-3 1264 3 116.5 10.5 1 91 253 08/13/02 LOT 61 24188-3 1262 5 120.8 12.9 7 92 254 08/13/02 ROTHENBERG DR., 24188-3 1261 26 115.8 9.0 1 91 STA 13+00 255 08/13/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1262 22 118.4 9.1 1 93 256 08/13/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1263 24 118.1 10.9 1 92 257 08/13/02 LOT 63 24188-3 1264 12 111.9 16.1 2 98 95% Req. 258 08/13/02 LOT 63 24188-3 1266 14 108.4 16.5 2 95 95% Req. 259 08/13/02 LOT 11 24188-3 1242 8TM 121.0 8.7 1 95 260 08/13/02 LOT 11 24188-3 1244 2 121.8 8.8 1 95 261 08/13/02 LOT 19 24188.3 1236 8TM 119.6 9.4 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT of #261A 261A 08/13/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1236 8TM 121.8 8.3 1 95 95% Req.RT of #261 262 08/13/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1238 2 120.2 9.2 1 94 95% Req., Failed, See RT of #262A 262A 08/13/02 LOT 19 24188.3 1238 2 122.1 8.8 1 95 95% Req., RT of #262 263 08/13/02 LOT 51 24188-3 1248 8TM 121.9 8.6 1 95 264 08/13/02 LOT 51 24188-3 1250 2 122.3 8.9 1 96 265 08/13/02 LOT 20 24188-3 1251 8TM 121.9 8.8 1 95 266 08/13/02 GUADAGNO DR., 24188.3 1254 2 122.1 8.2 1 95 LOTS 20 & 49 267 08/14/02 LOT 11 24188.3 1246 10 115.2 12.0 3 95 268 08/14/02 LOT 11 24188-3 1248 12 116.2 11.5 3 96 269 08/14/02 LOT 12 24188.3 1242 4 114.5 12.6 3 95 270 08/14/02 LOT 52 24188-3 1251 4 115.0 14.0 3 95 271 08/14/02 LOT 12 24188-3 1247 7 116.1 11.7 3 96 272 08/14/02 LOT 2 24188.3 1265 32 123.2 8.4 1 96 273 08/14/02 LOT 2 24188.3 1266 33 122.6 8.6 1 96 274 08/14/02 LOT 4 24188.3 1260 21 121.9 9.2 1 95 275 08/14/02 LOT 4 24188-3 1262 23 123.0 8.7 1 95 276 08/14/02 LOT 7 24188.3 1256 15 122.0 8.8 1 95 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :% Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFllE\1999\81 \99-112\99112.53.tr24188.fdt I I Table No. A.t, Field Density Tilst Results TeSt Test Location Tract Approx. Test App'o~.FIII pry Moist. Soli Comp.. Remarks Elev. BeloW-Test Density Content Type action (900/. Req. unl... noted) No. Date No. (It) (It) (pel) (0/.) ("to) . 277 08/14/02 LOT 7 24188-3 1258 17 121.7 9.8 1 95 278 08/14/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1264 38 115.4 8.5 1 90 279 08/14/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1266 41 117.5 7.5 1 92 280 08/14/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1264 33 116.6 7.6 1 91 281 08/14/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1266 35 117.8 7.2 1 92 282 08/14/02 LOT 7 24188-3 1260 19 116.9 7.8 1 91 283 08/14/02 LOT 7 24188.3 1264 23 118.5 8.0 1 93 284 08/14/02 LOT 95 24188-3 1282 2 118.8 10.6 1 93 285 08/14/02 LOT 64 . 24188-3 1265 2 114.9 8.9 1 90 08/14/02 LYLES DR., LOTS 64 & 95 24188.3 1278 8TM 108.7 3.0 1 85 Native Bottom, 85% 286 Req. 287 08/14/02 LOT 67 24188.3 1272 2 115.0 9.9 1 90 288 08/14/02 LOT 52 24188-3 1253 8 118.3 9.2 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT d288A 288A 08/14/02 lOT 52 24188.3 1253 8 122.3 8.9 1 96 95% Req., RT of #288 289 08/14/02 LOT 50 24188.3 1269 2 120.0 9.5 1 94 95% Req., Failed, See RT d289A 289A 08/14/02 LOT 50 24188.3 1269 2 121.9 9.0 1 95 95% Req., RT of #289 290 08/14/02 lOT 67 24188-3 1258 2 116.1 10.4 3 96 291 08/14/02 LOT 67 24188-3 1260 2 117.1 10.9 3 97 292 08/14/02 LOT 89 24188-2 1204 8TM 108.2 10.5 3 90 293 08/14/02 LOT 87 24188.2 1207 BTM 110.6 8.8 1 86 Failed, See RT #293A 293A 08/14/02 LOT 88 24188.2 1207 8TM 112.4 9.5 1 88 Failed, See RT #293B 2938 OB/14/02 LOT 89 24188-2 1207 8TM .115.7 9.4 1 90 RT of t/293A 294 08/14/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1209 2 111.7 12.9 3 92 295 09/10/02 GREENE CIR. IN FRONT OF 24188-2 1217 14 125.4 8.6 6 94 LOT 95 296 08/14/02 LOT 91 24188.2 1197 2 118.8 7.1 1 93 297 08/14/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1206 2 107.2 8.7 1 84 Failed, See RT #297A 297A 08/14/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1206 2 114.6 9.2 1 90 RT of #297 298 08/15/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1217 3 119.0 6.3 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT d298A 29BA 08/15/02 LOT 28 24188.2 1217 3 106.9 6.7 1 88 95% Req., Felled, See RT #298B 2988 08/15/02 LOT 28 24188.2 1217 3 115.4 7.6 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See #298C Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 12 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.1r24188.fdI S1 I I Table No.A-1, Field OensityTest Results Tesl Test Location Tract Appro.. Test Appro.. Fill Dry Moist. Soli Camp- Remarks No. Dale. No. Elev. Below Test Density Content Type action (90% Req; unlessn()ted) {ft) (ft) (pel) ('Yo) (%) 298C 08/15/02 LOT 28 24188.2 1217 3 114.6 9.5 3 95 95% Req., RT of #2988 299 08/15/02 LOT 27 KEYWAY AREA 24188.2 1205 3 116.8 4.9 1 91 95 % Req., Failed, See RT #299A 299A 08/15/02 LOT 27 KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1205 3 113.0 8.6 3 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #299B 299B OB/15/02 LOT 27 KEYWAY AREA 24188.2 1205 3 116.7 9.4 3 96 95% Req., RT of #299A 300 OB/15/02 LOT 10, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1210 3 121.7 9.5 1 95 95% Req. 301 08/15/02 LOT 27, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1208 6 121.3 10.2 1 95 95% Req. 302 08/15/02 LOT 11, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1212 8 117.2 9.6 3 97 95% Req. 303 08/15/02 LOT 10, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1212 6 119.3 7.7 1 93 95 % Req., Failed, See RT #303A 303A 08/15/02 LOT 10, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1212 6 122.0 7.5 1 95 95% Req., RT of #303 304 08/15/02 LOT 28, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1219 6 117.5 10.6 3 97 95% Req. 305 08/15/02 LOT 27, KEYWAY AREA 24188.2 1215 10 118.2 12.5 3 98 95% Req. 306 08/15/02 LOT 11, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1214 13 121.6 9.3 1 95 95% Req. 307 08/15/02 LOT 27, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1217 15 121.0 9.0 1 95 95% Req. 308 08/15/02 LOT 9, KEYWAY AREA 24188-2 1222 8 117.5 9.1 3 97 95% Req. 309 08/15/02 LOT 28, KEYWAY AREA 24188.2 1224 9 121.3 8.7 1 95 95% Req. 310 08/15/02 BETWEEN LOTS 10 & 11, 24188-2 1216 12 114.4 12.0 3 95 95 % Req. KEYWAY AREA 311 OB/15/02 LOT 27, END OF 24188.2 1220 8 120.0 13.1 3 99 95% Req. CUL-OE-SAC 312 08/15/02 LOT 28, END OF 24188-2 1222 10 121.3 9.0 1 95 95% Req. CUL-DE-SAC 313 08/15/02 LOT 28, NE RAMP AREA 24188-2 1224 2 114.8 9.1 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See RT#313A 313A 08/15/02 LOT 28, NE RAMP AREA 24188.2 1224 2 117.4 9.1 1 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT#313B 313B 08/15/02 LOT 28, NE RAMP AREA 24188.2 1224 2 117.0 8.2 1 91 95% Req., Failed, See RT#313C 313C 08/15/02 LOT 28, NE RAMP AREA 24188.2 1224 2 118.2 10.2 3 98 95 % Req., RT of #313B 314 08/15/02 LOT 21 24188.3 1260 3 122.6 7.9 1 96 95% Req. 315 08/15/02 LOT 21 24188-3 1262 5 121.1 7.7 1 95 95% Req. 316 08/15/02 GUADAGNO DR. . 24188.3 1258 4 121.6 8.9 1 95 95% Req. 317 08/15/02 GUADAGNO DR. 24188.3 1260 6 122.4 8.5 1 96 95% Req. 318 08/15/02 LOT 67 24188.3 1276 6 117.4 7.2 1 92 319 08/15/02 LOT 68 24188.3 1278 10 116.9 7.1 1 91 320 08/15/02 LOT 51 I 24188-3 1269 14 117.3 7.2 1 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81 199-112199112-53.tr24188.fdt 3>~ II I I Table No. ,1),-1, Field Density Test ResUlts . . Approx; Test Approx. Fill Dry Moist, Comp- Test Test LOcation Tract Soli Remarlts No., Date No. Elev. Below'Test Density Content Type action (90%Req. unless noted) . (ft) (ft) (pcf) (0/0) (%) 321 08/15/02 LOT 51 24188-3 1270 15 118.2 7.6 1 92 322 08/15/02 LOT 20 24188-3 1263 13 122.7 7.0 1 96 95% Req. . 323 08/15/02 LOT 19 24188.3 1253 13 121.8 9.0 1 95 95% Req. 324 08/15/02 LOT 20 24188.3 1265 15 122.2 7.4 1 96 95% Req. 325 08/15/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1262 14 122.5 7.7 1 96 326 08/15/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1264 16 121.9 8.5 1 95 327 08/15/02 LOT 66 24188-3 1275 10 122.3 8.1 1 96 328 08/15/02 LOT 66 24188-3 1275 10 121.6 7.8 1 95 329 08/15102 LOT 20 24188.3 1265 15 118.5 11.5 3 98 330 08/15102 LOT 20 24188-3 1265 15 119.7 11.4 3 98 331 08/16102 LOT 9, SLOPE, RAMP 24188-2 1223 13 118.8 9.2 3 98 95% Req. AREA 332 08116/02 LOT 11, SLOPE 24188.2 1225 25 121.0 8.8 1 95 95% Req. 333 08/16/02 LOT 27, SLOPE 24188-2 1220 24 119.5 8.7 1 93 334 08/16/02 LOT 11, SLOPE 24188.2 1220 16 116.2 10.0 3 96 95% Req. 335 08/16/02 lOT 9, SLOPE 24188.2 1224 2 117.8 9.1 3 97 95% Req. 336 08/16/02 LOT 11, SLOPE 24188-2 1221 22 119.3 10.9 1 93 337 08/16/02 LOT 10, SLOPE 24188-2 1224 21 113.9 10.4 3 94 338 08/1 6/02 LOT 27, SLOPE 24188-2 1229 27 117.7 7.0 1 92 339. 08/16/02 LOT 11, SLOPE 24188.2 1230 3 115.0 10.0 3 95 95% Req. 340 08/16/02 LOT 9 24188-2 1230 15 117.8 12.0 3 97 95% Req. 341 08/16/02 LOT 27 24188.2 1223 6 121.4 10.0 1 95 95% Aeq. 342 08/16/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1225 8 108.9 11.6 2 95 95% Req. 343 08/16/02 LOT 9 24188.2 1229 4 114.8 7.8 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See RT #343A 343A 08/1 6/02 LOT 9 24188.2 1229 4 124.5 6.3 1 97 95% Req., RT of #343 344 08/16/02 LOT 10 24188.2 1226 6 117.2 9.8 3 97 95% Req. 345 08/16/02 LOT 27 24188-2 1225 15 108.5 15.0 2 95 95% Req. 346 08/16/02 LOT 8 24188-2 1228 12 114.9 8.0 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See RT #346A 346A 08/16/02 LOT 8 24188-2 1228 12 117.4 10.1 3 97 95% Req., RT of #346 347 08/16102 LOT 28 24188-2 1224 9 108.9 13.1 2 95 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 2418a March 6, 2003 Page 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .3'\ Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53,tr24188.fdt I I . Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results Test Test Location Tract Approx. Test Approx. Fill Dry Moist. Soli Comp- Remarks No. Date. No, Elev. Below Test DensIty Content Typ~ action (900/. Req. unless noted) (It) (It) (pel) (o/ci) (0/.) . 348 08/16/02 LOTS 11 & 27 24188-2 1229 5 115.6 10.0 3 96 349 08/16/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1244 23 115.8 7.7 1 90 350 08/16/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1244 23 117.4 7.9 1 92 351 08/16/02 LOT 34 24188-3 1241 20 115.3 16.0 3 95 352 08/16/02 LOT 34 24188-3 1241 20 115.6 16.5 3 95 353 08/16/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1260 4 115.3 8.0 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See RT #3S3A 353A 08/16/02 LOT 64 24188-3 1260 4 121.9 8.2 1 95 95% Req., RT of #353 354 08/1 6/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1260 5 115.4 7.9 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See RT #354A 354A 08/16/02 lOT 64 24188-3 1260 5 122.1 8.0 1 95 95% Req., RT of #354 355 08/16/02 LOT 50 24188-3 1273 8 121.5 7.0 1 95 356 08/16/02 LOT 50 24188.3 1273 8 120.3 7.8 1 94 357 08/16/02 LOT 19 24188.3 1254 12 116.6 11.1 3 96 358 08/16/02 LOTtS 24188.3 1254 12 115.6 10.9 3 96 359 08/16/02 LOT 63 24188 1240 17 117.4 7.8 1 92 360 08/16/02 LOT 63 24188 1241 18 116.3 8.4 1 91 361 08/16/02 LOT 62 24188 1240 15 122.9 8.7 1 96 362 08/16/02 LOT 62 24188 1242 17 123.4 9.4 1 96 363 08/16/02 LOT 63 24188.3 1266 14 116.4 7.7 1 91 364 08/16/02 LOT 63 24188-3 1268 16 117.2 7.6 1 92 365 08/16/02 LOT 52 24188-3 1257 12 116.2 10.2 3 96 366 08/16/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1259 14 117.3 10.8 3 97 367 08/16/02 LOT 51 24188.3 1272 10 122.4 8.6 1 96 368 08/16/02 LOT 50 24188.3 1274 12 122.9 7.9 1 96 369 08/1 9/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1255 15 122.6 8.7 1 96 370 08/19/02 GRANDCOLAS DR.. 24188-3 1265 20 123.2 9.8 1 97 LOTS 52 & 20 371 08/19/02 GRANDCOLAS DR., 24188-3 1267 22 122.6 8.3 1 96 LOTS 52 & 20 372 08/19/02 LOT 51 24188-3 1272 10 114.9 11.0 1 90 373 08/19/02 LOT 51 24188.3 1274 12 116.0 10.9 1 91 374 08/19/02 LOT 64 24188-3 1270 10 114.7 10.2 1 90 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 15 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt L\o I I Table No. A-1. Field Density Test Results . . Test Test Loeatl()n Tract Appro.. Test Appro.. Fill Dry MOI~. Soli COllll>' Remarks No; Date No. Elev. SelowTest Density Content Type action (90% Req. unless noted) . .. (ft) (ft) (pel) ('Yo) ('Yo) 375 08/19/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1272 12 121.7 10.0 1 95 376 08/19/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1269 21 118.3 10.4 1 92 377 08/19/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1270 22 117.1 9.9 1 92 378 08/19/02 lOT 21 24188-3 1272 7 118.7 9.9 1 93 379 08/19/02 lOT 21 24188-3 1273 8 119.7 10.1 1 94 380 08/19/02 LOT 28. SLOPE 24188.2 1233 9 112.8 13.4 3 93 381 08/19/02 LOT 27, SLOPE 24188-2 1232 30 114.7 9.2 1 90 382 08/19/02 LOT 9, SLOPE 24188.2 1228 10 122.8 7.8 1 96 383 08/19/02 LOT 27 24188-2 1227 15 123.2 7.8 1 96 384 08/19/02 LOT 10. SLOPE 24188-2 1228 6 124.9 9.3 1 98 385 08/19/02 LOT 28. SLOPE 24188.2 1236 11 113.5 7.5 1 89 95% Req., Failed, See RT #385A 385A 08/19/02 LOT 28, SLOPE 24188-2 1236 11 115.1 6.8 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See RT #385B 3858 08/19/02 LOT 28; SLOPE 24188-2 1236 11 114.3 10.9 3 95 95% Req., RT of #385A 386 08/19/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1228 4 108.7 14.7 2 95 387 08/19/02 LOT 27, SLOPE 24188.2 1228 20 118.7 10.4 3 98 388 08/19/02 LOT 10 24188.2 1232 7 116.7 13.3 3 96 389 08/19/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1244 20 117.2 9.8 1 92 390 08/19/02 LOT 34 24188-3 1244 18 121.6 8.0 6 91 391 08/19/02 LOT 62 24188 1240 19 115.0 8.5 1 90 392 08/19/02 LOT 36 24188-3 .1245 5 104.3 14.9 3 86 Failed, See RT #392A 392A 08/19/02 LOT 36 24188.3 1245 5 109.2 12.5 3 90 RT of #392 393 08/19/02 LOT 35 24188.3 1242 11 115.1 8.1 1 90 394 08/19/02 LOT 34 24188-3 1245 17 110.8 12.1 3 92 395 08/19/02 LOT 63 24188 1244 21 111.9 14.2 3 93 396 08/19/02 LOT 35 24188-3 1244 4 110.8 10.3 3 92 397 08/1 9/02 RIVERA DR. 24188-3 1250 8 104.8 11.8 3 87 Failed, See RT #397A 397A 08/20/02 RIVERA DR. 24188-3 1250 B 111.0 12.2 3 92 RT of #397 398 08/20/02 LOT 53 24188.3 1270 18 119.1 9.5 1 93 399 08/20/02 LOT 53 24188-3 1272 20 118.5 9.8 1 93 Field Oens~y Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6,2003 Page 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A.\ Converse Consuftants CCIENT\OFFICEWDBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.lr24188. fdt I I T<lble No. A-1, Field Density Test Results . Test Test Lo~tlOrl Tract Appr()x~ TeSt Approx. 'FlU DrY Moist 'Soli Camp- Remarks No. Date No. E'lev. Below Test Density Content Type action '(90%Req~unless:noted) (ft) (ft) (pet) ('/0) ('!o) 400 08/20/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1272 24 124.6 8.3 6 94 401 08/20/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1272 26 122.5 8.4 1 96 402 08/20/02 LOT 19 24188.3 1251 19 122.9 9.7 1 96 403 08/20/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1261 21 126.8 9.9 6 95 404 08/20/02 GLICK CT.. LOTS 12 & 19 24188.3 1261 20 122.9 7.9 1 96 405 08/20/02 GLICK CT., LOTS 12 & 19 24188.3 1252 22 121.6 7.8 1 95 406 08/20/02 LOT 55 24188-3 1254 18 125.6 8.9 6 94 407 08/20/02 LOT 55 24188-3 1258 19 125.8 10.2 6 95 408 08/20/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1259 12 121.3 7.1 1 95 409 08/20/02 LOT 28 24188.2 1243 12 121.8 7.5 1 95 410 08/20/02 LOT 27/28 24188.2 1243 8 119.2 8.3 1 93 411 08/20/02 LOT 27/28 24188.2 1238 8 119.7 7.9 1 94 412 08/20/02 LOT 9 24188-2 1238 16 117.8 6.9 1 92 413 08/20/02 LOT 9 24188.2 1239 16 119.1 6.5 1 93 414 08/20/02 ALONG PAUBA RD., 24188.3 1250 8TM 105.2 6.2 1 82 Pass, Due to Dry lOT 77, KEYWAY Density; 100 pet Req. 415 08/20/02 ALONG PAU8A RD.. 24188-3 1256 8TM 113.0 5.1 1 88 Native Bottom, 85 % LOT 82, KEYWAY Req. 416 08/20/02 ALONG PAUBA RD., 24188-3 1264 8TM 121.6 5.6 1 95 LOT 84, KEYWAY 417 08/20/02 LOT 62 24188 1247 25 113.3 14.4 3 94 418 08/20/02 LOT 63 24188 1248 25 113.4 14.0 3 94 419 08/20/02 RIVERA DR. 24188-3 1245 8 113.2 10.5 3 94 420 08/20/02 LOT 36 24188.3 1242 3 113.3 12.0 3 94 421 08/20/02 LOT 97 24188-3 1267 15 121.1 10.6 1 95 422 08/20/02 LOT 94 & 95 24188.3 1290 2 110.1 10.2 3 91 423 08/20/02 LOT 94 24188.3 1291 3 113.7 10.2 3 94 424 08/20/02 LOTS 29 & 30 24188.2 1238 2 113.6 12.2 3 94 425 08/20/02 LOT 28, SLOPE 24188.2 1238 18 119.5 11.6 1 93 426 08/20/02 LOT 27, SLOPE 24188.2 1236 34 115.0 8.0 1 90 427 08/20/02 LOT 10, SLOPE 24188-2 1235 31 118.3 9.3 1 92 428 08/20/02 LOT 27, SLOPE 24188-2 1230 4 109.9 12.1 3 91 Field Densny Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4Z-- Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdl I I . Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results . . Appro.. T"$\ ApprQx, Fill Dry Moist. Camp- Test Test Location Tract 5011 Remarks ,No. Date EIEW. Below Test Denslty Content Type action (90% Req. unless noted) No. (ft) (ft) (pel) (%) (%) . 429 08/20/02 LOT 29. SLOPE 24188-2 1230 4 119.8 10.1 1 94 430 08/20/02 LOT 30 24188-2 1246 6 111.3 11.6 3 92 431 08/20/02 LOT 11 24188-2 1223 10 114.8 8.5 1 90 432 08/20/02 LOT 8 24188.2 1232 16 114.5 8.6 1 90 433 08/20/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1236 8 122.4 6.0 1 96 434 08/20/02 LOT 28. SLOPE 24188-2 1236 29 108.8 11.2 3 90 435 08/20/02 LOTS 10 & 11 24188.2 1237 33 110.7 13.3 3 92 436 08/20/02 LOT 27 24188-2 1236 8 125.0 7.2 1 98 437 08/20/02 LOT 32 24188-2 1250 4 118.4 8.9 1 93 43B 08/20/02 LOT 33 24188-2 1254 6 112.0 11.8 3 93 439 08/20/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1246 20 113.8 11.4 3 94 440 08/20/02 LOT 27 24188-2 1237 7 116.0 12.4 3 96 441 08/20/02 LOT 11 24188.2 1245 10 , 17.1 10.2 3 97 442 08/20/02 LOT 9 24188.2 1242 12 116.3 13.1 3 96 443 08/21/02 BEHIND LOT 79 24188.3 1254 2 119.8 8.6 1 94 95% Req., Failed, See RT #443A 443A 08/21/02 8EHIND LOT 79 24188-3 1254 2 122.5 8.6 1 96 95% Req., AT of 1/443 444 08/21/02 BEHIND LOT 82 24188.3 1257 2 118.9 8.2 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #444A 444A 08/21/02 8EHIND LOT 82 24188-3 1257 2 123.1 8.2 1 96 95% Req., RT of #444 445 08/21/02 8EHIND LOT 78 24188.3 1256 4 122.6 9.0 1 96 446 08/21/02 8EHIND LOT 80 24188.3 1258 4 121.4 9.7 1 95 447 08/21/02 8EHIND LOT 83 24188-3 1259 2 122.6 8.8 1 96 448 08/21/02 BEHIND LOT 78 24188.3 1258 6 121.9 9.2 1 95 449 08/21/02 8EHIND LOT 82 24188.3 1260 4 123.3 8.2 1 96 450 08/21/02 BEHIND lOT 84 24188.3 1261 4 122.1 9.0 1 95 451 08/21/02 BEHIND LOT 79 24188.3 1258 6 123.5 8.6 1 97 452 08/21/02 BEHINO LOT 82 24188.3 1264 B 124.0 8.0 1 97 453 08/21/02 8EHIND LOT 83 24188-3 1262 5 121.6 9.2 1 95 454 08/21102 BEHIND LOT 7B 24188-3 1260 10 122.3 B.6 1 96 455 OB/21/02 BEHIND LOT BO 24188-3 1262 9 122.4 9.0 1 96 Field DensilyTables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 18 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt ~ I I Field Oens1ty Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 19 I Table No. A-1, Field Density Test .Results . Test Test Location Tract Al>prox. Test Approx. Fill Dry MJ>lol. Soli Cornp- Remarks No. Date Elev. Below Test Density Content Type attlon (90% Req. unlllSonoted) No. (ft) (ft) (pel) (%) (%) .. 456 08/21/02 BEHIND LOT 82 24188.3 1266 10 121.6 9.8 1 95 457 08/21/02 BEHIND LOT 83 24188.3 1270 13 121.9 9.6 1 95 458 08/21/02 BEHIND LOT 82 24188-3 1268 13 123.2 8.0 1 96 459 08/21/02 BEHIND LOT 78 24188.3 1263 13 122.4 7.0 1 96 460 08/21/02 LOTS 94 & 95 @ STREET 24188-3 1281 15 116.2 11.0 1 91 461 08/21/02 LOTS 92 & 93 @ STREET 24188-3 1285 4 116.1 9.0 1 91 462 08/21/02 LOT 95 24188.3 1281 20 108.9 10.5 3 90 463 08/21/02 LOT 96 24188-3 1278 15 11S.8 12.7 3 96 464 08/21/02 LOT 94 24188-3 1286 10 108.8 10.7 3 90 465 08/21/02 LOT 50 24188-3 1277 5 120.9 10.5 1 95 466 08/21/02 LOT 18 24188-3 1266 3 123.8 10.1 1 97 467 08/21/02 LOT 13 24188-3 1252 8 124.5 11.2 1 97 468 08/21/02 LOT 53 24188.3 1272 20 120.5 12.9 1 94 469 08/21/02 LOT 18 24188-3 1272 12 124.0 10.4 1 97 470 08/21/02 LOTS 95 & 96 24188.3 1270 8 109.9 11.8 3 91 471 08/21/02 LOT 96 24188-3 1265 10 120.5 11.0 1 94 472 08/21/02 LOT 68 24188-3 1280 9 117.0 10.3 1 91 473 08/21/02 LOT 94 24188-3 1287 7 118.3 9.2 1 92 474 08/21/02 LOT 51 24188.3 1276 21 112.5 12.5 3 93 475 08/21/02 LOT 28, SLOPE 24188.2 1249 24 117.5 6.0 1 92 476 08/21/02 LOT 27, SLOPE 24188.2 1245 23 114.1 12.8 3 94 477 08/21/02 LOT 11, SLOPE 24188-2 1245 21 112.4 13.6 3 93 478 08/21/02 LOT 9. SLOPE 24188-2 1244 26 119.1 11.7 1 93 479 08/21/02 LOT 29. MIDDLE 24188-2 1246 13 116.3 12.2 3 96 95% Req. 480 08/21/02 lOT 26, CUL-DE-SAC 24188-2 1244 6 113.9 12.2 3 94 95% Req., Failed, RT #480A 480A 08/21/02 LOT 26 24188-2 1244 6 114.5 12.4 3 95 95% Req., RT of #480 481 08/21/02 LOT 28, SLOPE 24188.2 1250 25 110.6 11.3 3 91 482 08/21/02 LOT 27 24188.2 1246 24 116.7 8.1 1 91 483 08/21/02 LOT 10 24188-2 1245 16 108.7 14.4 2 95 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I ~ Converse Consultants CCJENT\OFFICEIJOBFJLE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I , Table No. A-1, FieldOensityTest Results Test Test Location Tract Approx. To,st Approx.FIII pry Moist. Soli Comp. Remarks . No. Date No. Elev. Below Test Density 'Content Type action (90%Req. unless<noted) (It) (11) (pel) ('Yo) ('Yo) 484 08/21/02 LOT 29 24188.2 1248 15 116.5 13.0 3 96 485 08/21/02 LOT 30, MIDDLE 24188-2 1250 8 113.5 11.2 3 94 486 08/21/02 LOT 26. PARKWAY 24188.2 1244 8 116.4 13.3 3 96 95% Req. 487 08/21/02 LOT 29 24188.2 1254 20 114.4 10.7 3 95 95% Req. 488 08/21/02 LOT 28. CUL-DE-SAC 24188-2 1248 18 112.8 13.2 3 93 489 08/21/02 LOTS 26 & 27 24188-2 1249 15 113.0 15.3 3 93 490 08/21102 LOT 10 24188-2 1246 17 119.8 9.7 1 94 491 08/22/02 LOT 78 24188.3 1266 16 123.3 8.3 1 96 492 08/22102 LOT 78 24188.3 1267 17 121.6 8.1 1 95 493 08/22/02 BEHIND LOT 80 24188-3 1270 15 119.2 7.9 1 93 494 08/22102 BEHIND LOT BO 24188.3 1271 16 l1B.6 8.0 1 93 495 OB/22/02 BEHIND LOT B3 24188-3 1275 18 121.3 7.8 1 95 496 08/22/02 BEHIND lOTS 82 & 83 24188.3 1276 19 118.5 7.9 1 93 497 08/22/02 BEHIND LOT 79 24188.3 1273 13 120.8 7.2 1 94 498 08/22/02 BEHIND LOT 80 24188-3 1273 11 117.4 7.7 1 92 499 08/22/02 BEHIND LOT 83 24188.3 1275 7 119.2 7.3 1 93 500 08/22/02 BEHIND LOT 83 24188-3 1280 9 116.8 8.2 1 91 501 08/22/02 BEHIND LOT 84 24188.3 1280 16 118.6 7.3 1 93 502 08122/02 BEHIND LOT 80 24188-3 1278 5 117.6 8.0 1 92 503 08/22/02 BEHIND LOT 80 24188-3 1276 3 116.9 8.3 1 91 504 08122/02 BEHIND LOT 82 24188-3 1277 2 117.1 7.3 1 92 505 08/22/02 BEHIND LOT 83 24188-3 1280 12 116.8 7.3 1 91 506 08/22/02 LOT 26. CUL-DE-SAC 24188.2 1250 20 112.1 14.3 3 93 507 08/22/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1253 23 108.0 16.6 2 94 508 08/22/02 LOT 32 24188.2 1259 9 120.6 11.0 1 94 509 08/22102 LOT 31 24188.2 1257 11 117.6 11.8 1 92 510 08/22102 LOT 28. SLOPE 24188-2 1260 35 109.0 12.8 3 90 51 , 08/22/02 LOT 8 24188-2 1254 15 106.4 16.0 2 93 512 08/22/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1256 3 109.9 14.3 3 91 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 20 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdl A$ I I . Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results. Test Test Location Tract Approx. Test Approx. Fill Dry Moist. Soil Camp.- RemarkS No. Date Elev. Below Test Density Content Type action (90%Req. unless noted) No. (ft) (ft) (pcf) (OJ.) ('10) . 513 08/22/02 LOT 27 24188-2 1254 30 109.0 13.9 3 90 514 08/22/02 LOT 11 24188-2 1249 25 108.5 17.4 2 95 515 08/22/02 LOT 9 24188-2 1252 13 109.5 16.2 2 96 516 08/22/02 LOT 11 24188-2 1251 15 113.6 16.8 3 94 517 08/22/02 LOT 26, MIDDLE 24188-2 1253 11 122.0 13.5 1 95 518 08/22/02 LOT 10 24188.2 1250 19 110.5 15.9 3 91 519 08/22/02 LOT 10 24188-2 1253 2 119.1 16.4 1 93 520 08/22/02 LOT 27 24188-2 1255 21 116.0 9.5 1 91 521 08/22/02 LOT 26 24188-2 1260 11 116.4 9.1 1 91 522 08/22/02 LOT 28, SLOPE 24188.2 1261 35 118.4 9.4 1 93 523 08/22/02 LOT 30 24188-2 1257 14 110.6 15.5 3 91 524 08/22/02 LOT 29 24188.2 1261 18 115.0 11.6 3 95 525 08/22/02 LOT 11 24188.2 1253 17 111.4 15.1 3 92 526 08/22/02 LOT 26 24188-2 1255 7 119.3 15.9 1 93 527 08/22/02 LOT 31 24188.2 1260 14 114.1 12.6 3 94 528 08/22/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1253 13 100.9 23.2 2 88 Failed, See RT #528A 528A 08/22/02 lOT 9 24188-3 1253 13 104.3 16.5 2 91 RT of #528 529 08/22/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1255 15 99.3 23.6 2 87 Failed, See RT #529A 529A 08/22/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1255 15 104.3 15.7 2 91 Rr of #529 530 08/22/02 lOT 95 24188.3 1276 2 116.3 8.7 1 91 531 08/22/02 LOT 95 24188-3 1277 3 116.3 7.5 1 91 532 08/22/02 LOT 97 24188-3 1267 14 116.2 7.1 1 91 533 08/22/02 LOT 97 24188.3 1266 13 120.8 11.8 1 94 534 08/22/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1266 14 118.7 12.3 1 93 535 08/22/02 LOT 62 24188.3 1266 14 119.6 12.3 1 94 536 08/22/02 GLICK CT., LOTS 12 & 18 24188-3 1257 19 114.1 11.0 1 89 Failed, See RT #548 537 08/22/02 LOT 51 24188-3 1281 31 112.8 12.3 1 88 Failed, See RT #538 538 08/22/02 LOT 51 24188-3 1281 16 115.6 6.2 1 90 RT of #537 539 08/22/02 LOT 65 24188.3 1277 16 119.0 9.1 1 93 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I Converse Consultants CC1ENT\QFFICEIJOBF1LEI1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr241 BB.fdt 4lP I I Table No.. A-1, Fielcl Den$ity T$$t Re$ulls Test Test Location Tract Approx, :Te$t Approx. Fill Dry Moist. Soli Comp- Remarks No. Date No. Elev. BEllow Test Density Content Type action (90% Req. unle$! Mted) .. (ft) (ft) (pel) (%) (%) 540 08/22/02 LOT 65 24188-3 1277 16 116.1 8.2 1 91 541 08/22/02 LOT 94 24188-3 1277 3 118.9 10.3 1 93 542 08/22/02 LOT 95 24188.3 1281 8 114.0 7.1 1 90 543 08/22/02 LOT 95 24188-3 1280 8 109.8 7.0 1 85 Failed, See RT #569 544 08/22/02 LOT 97 24188-3 1271 8 114.4 12.1 3 95 545 08/22/02 LOT 97 24188.3 1271 8 112.5 12.9 3 93 546 08/23/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1250 8 123.2 7.3 1 96 547 08/23/02 LOT 13 24188.3 1250 6 121.8 9.0 1 95 548 08/23/02 GLICK CT.. LOTS 12 & 18 24168.3 1257 4 123.5 7.2 1 97 RT of #536 549 06/23/02 LOT 76 24188-3 1235 8TM 119.6 8.9 . 1 93 550 08/23/02 LOT 21 24188 1232 BTM 105.8 18.5 1 83 Pass, Due to Dry Density, 100 pet Req. 551 08/23/02 LOT 75 24188-3 1232 2 . 119.5 10.0 1 93 95% Req., Failed, RT #551A 551A 08/23/02 LOT 75 24168-3 1232 2 122.0 9.9 1 95 95% Req., RT of #551 552 08/23/02 LOT 20 24188 1230 2 120.2 9.5 1 94 95% Req., Failed, RT #552A 552A 08/23/02 LOT 20 24166 1230 2 121.8 9.3 1 95 95% Req., See AT #552 553 06/23/02 LOT 76' 24188.3 1238 3 123.1 8.9 1 96 554 08/23/02 LOT 21 24186 1236 4 122.2 9.2 1 96 555 06/23/02 LOT 75 24188-3 1237 5 121.9 10.6 1 95 556 06/23/02 LOT 19 24188 1230 5 116.6 13.0 3 96 557 06/23/02 LOT 75 24188-3 1240 6 116.0 12.6 3 96 ~ 556 06/23/02 LOT 19 24168 1233 6 117.3 12.6 3 97 559 08/23/02 LOT 76 24188.3 1241 6 116.2 13.6 3 96 560 08/23/02 LOT 20 24188 1238 6 121.6 10.0 1 95 561 06/23/02 LOT 75 24188-3 1244 12 122.3 9.2 1 96 562 08/23/02 LOT 19 24168 1237 12 121.9 9.5 1 95 563 08/23/02 LOT 20 24188 1241 12 122.3 9.2 1 96 564 08/23/02 LOT 75 24186-3 1246 16 115.8 14.3 3 96 565 08/23/02 LOT 21 24168 1246 14 114.9 13.9 3 95 566 08/23/02 LOT 94 24168-3 1266 8 121.0 11.1 1 95 Field Densrt.y Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 22 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt 41 I I Field Densfty Tables Newland Homes Tract 241S8 March 6, 2003 Page 23 I Table No.A-1. Field Density Test Results Tost TeSt Location Tract Approx. Test Approx.FIIi Dry Moist. Soli Compo Romarl<s No, Date No. Elev. Below. Test Dfimslly Content Typo action {90% Req. unlessnotedl (It) (It) (pel) (%) (%) 567 08/23/02 LOT 94 24188-3 1289 8 115.0 13.4 1 90 568 08/23/02 LOT 94 24188-3 1279 8 108.6 14.4 3 91 569 08/23/02 LOT 95 24188-3 1280 8 110.4 16.9 3 92 RT of #543 570 08/23/02 LOT 96 24188-3 1269 8 113.0 13.0 3 93 571 08/23/02 LOT 96 24188.3 1269 8 114.3 13.4 3 95 572 24188.2 . 08/23/02 LOT 92. SLOPE SE 1195 2 118.6 12.5 1 93 573 08/23/02 LOT 92, SLOPE SE 24188-2 1195 2 119.5 10.9 1 93 574 08/23/02 LOT 92, SLOPE SW 24188-2 1197 4 118.8 12.9 1 92 575 08/23/02 LOT 92, SLOPE WEST 24188.2 1197 4 121.3 11.4 1 94 576 08/23/02 LOT 92, SLOPE WEST 24188-2 1198 5 118.6 12.5 1 92 577 08/23/02 LOT 92, SLOPE WEST 24188.2 1198 5 120.6 12.1 1 94 578 08/23/02 LOT 7 24188-3 1259 28 119.2 10.1 1 93 579 08/23/02 LOT 7 24188-3 1260 29 111.5 8.1 3 92 580 08/23/02 LOT 31 24188-3 1255 13 115.8 10.7 1 90 581 08/23/02 LOT 31 24188-3 1256 14 112.0 10.0 3 93 582 08/23/02 LOT 32 24188.3 1253 30 108.8 9.1 3 90 583 08/23/02 LOT 32 24188.3 1254 31 112.5 8.9 3 93 584 08/23/02 LOT 7. ENO OF CUL-DE- 24188.3 1255 15 117.3 11.5 1 92 SAC, NORTH END 585 08/23/02 LOT 7, END OF CUL-DE- 24188.3 1256 16 118.3 10.7 1 92 SAC, NORTH END 586 08/23/02 LOT 11 24188-3 1254, 18 112.7 8.0 3 93 587 08/23/02 LOT 11 24188.3 1255 19 110.3 8.7 3 91 588 08/23/02 LOTS 12 & 13, LATERAL 24188.3 1257 18 114.7 9.1 1 90 589 08/23/02 LOTS 12 & 13. LATERAL 24188-3 1258 19 115.7 9.0 1 90 590 08/23/02 LOT 9 24188.3 1256 12 115.4 8.0 1 90 591 08/23/02 LOT 9 24188.3 1257 13 116.7 9.7 1 91 592 08/23/02 LOT 10 24188-3 1258 31 108.6 15.4 3 90 593 08/23/02 LOT 10 24188.3 1259 32 108.5 15.6 3 90 594 08/23/02 LOT 7 24188.3 1264 33 116.1 7.5 1 91 595 08/23/02 LOT 7 24188.3 1265 34 117.8 7.4 1 92 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 4f> Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFF!CEIJOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt . I. Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 24 I table No. A-t, Field Density Test Restllts Test Test > Location Tract ApP'~" Test Appro.. Fill , PI"}' Moist. Soil Comp.. , Remarks Elev. Below Test Density Content action No. Date No. (It) (It) (Pd) (%) T~pe (%) ,(9(),"oReq. unless 'notecl) . 596 08/23/02 LOT 18 24188.3 1267 15 121.1 9.4 1 95 597 08/23/02 LOT 18 24188.3 1268 16 120.8 9.3 1 94 599 08/26/02 LOT 77 24188-3 1258 10 113.6 11.3 8 94 600 08/26/02 LOT 75 24188.3 1245 15 115.6 10.8 8 96 601 08/26/02 LOT 75 24188-3 1247 17 115.5 11.8 8 96 602 08/26/02 LOT 77 24188.3 1272 8 116.3 11.9 8 96 603 08/26/02 LOT 79 24188.3 1274 21 121.8 10.8 1 95 604 08/26/02 LOT 80 24188-3 1280 7 122.3 9.2 1 96 605 08/26/02 LOT 83 24188-3 1282 14 118.6 8.3 1 93 606 08/26/02 LOT 79 24188.3 1272 19 118.1 11.1 1 92 607 08/26/02 LOT 77 24188-3 1267 15 118.6 10.3 1 93 608 08/26/02 LOT 20 24188-3 1250 25 115.8 9.3 8 96 609 08/26/02 LOTS 76 & 77 24188.3 1259 11 115.8 10.3 8 96 610 08/26/02 LOT 77 24188-3 1261 11 120.4 8.4 1 94 611 08/26/02 LOT 78 24188.3 1265 15 119.2 8.7 1 93 612 08/26/02 LOT 79 24188-3 1267 15 124.0 7.6 1 97 . 613 08/26/02 lOT 80 24188.3 1280 8 124.6 7.8 1 97 614 08/26/02 LOT 99 24188.3 1265 8 117.9 11.6 1 92 615 08/26/02 LOT 96 24188-3 1275 9 105.4 19.3 2 92 616 08/26/02 LOT 64 24188-3 1274 11 110.7 13.5 3 92 617 08/26/02 LOT 96 24188-3 1277 10 113.3 12.8 3 94 618 08/26/02 LOT 98 24188-3 1268 16 119.7 8.5 1 94 619 08/26/02 LOT 100 24188.3 1266 7 117.2 12.3 1 92 620 08/26/02 LOT 97 24188.3 1269 13 113.1 13.9 3 94 621 08/26/02 LOT 100 24188-3 1267 10 117.6 7.8 1 92 622 08/26/02 LOT 63 24188-3 1265 12 118.6 11.0 1 93 623 08/26/02 LOT 65 24188-3 1271 10 115.5 13.5 3 96 624 08/26/02 LOT 66 24188-3 1277 12 111.8 11.5 3 92 625 08/26/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1268 28 114.7 14.0 1 90 . . I I II I . I I I I I I I I I ~'\ Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I. I Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results ... . Compo Test Test " Location Tract Appro.. Test Appro.. Fill pry Moist' Soli RemarkS "'No. Pale No. Elev. Below Test Penslty Content Type action (90%Req. unless noted) (ft) (II) (pet) (0/.) ('!o) 626 08/26/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1269 29 117.3 12.4 1 92 627 08/26/02 LOT 11 24188-3 1262 26 117.3 7.6 1 92 628 08/26/02 LOT 11 24188-3 1263 27 116.0 9.0 1 91 629 08/26/02 LOT 9 24188.3 1260 16 114.6 11.7 1 90 630 08/26/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1261 17 115.3 10.8 1 90 631 08/26/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1271 31 116.8 7.8 1 91 632 08/26/02 LOT 19 24188.3 1273 32 117.6 6.6 1 92 633 08/26/02 LOT 18 24188-3 1271 19 114.9 14.0 1 90 634 08/26/02 LOT 18 24188.3 1272 20 116.4 14.2 1 91 635 08/26/02 LOT 17 24188.3 1268 17 115.2 13.3 1 90 636 08/26/02 lOT 17 24188-3 1269 18 114.7 13.6 1 90 637 08/26/02 LOT 12 24188.3 1265 26 117.6 13.2 1 92 638 08/26/02 LOT 12 24188.3 1266 27 117.9 13.4 1 92 639 08/26/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1262 18 114.6 12.2 1 90 640 08/26/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1263 19 114.8 12.0 1 90 641 08/27/02 LOT 99 24188.3 1270 4 119.7 7.9 1 94 642 08/27/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1271 5 116.8 9.5 1 91 643 08/27/02 LOT 97 24188.3 1277 10 120.8 9.4 1 94 644 08/27/02 LOT 97 24188.3 1278 11 118.6 7.1 1 93 645 08/27/02 LOTS 95 & 96, LATERAL 24188-3 1282 2 120.6 7.9 1 94 646 08/27/02 LOTS 95 & 96, LATERAL 24188-3 1283 3 121.4 7.6 1 95 647 08/27/02 LOT 67 24188-3 1282 9 108.5 19.7 3 90 648 08/27/02 LOT 67 24188-3 1283 10 113.7 15.0 3 94 649 08/27/02 LOT 50 24188-3 1280 9 109.2 16.9 3 90 650 08/27/02 LOT 50 24188-3 1281 10 108.7 17.2 3 90 651 08/27/02 LOT 97 24188-3 1280 13 110.7 9.3 3 91 652 0'8/27/02 LOT 97 24188-3 1281 14 111.9 9.7 3 92 653 08/27/02 LOT 98 24188-3 1276 15 115.8 11.5 1 91 654 08/27/02 LOT 98 24188-3 1277 7 115.2 9.8 1 90 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 25 I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. ~C) Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICE\JOBFILE\1999181\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I ^' Tablll No. A-1, FillldDllnsityTllStRllSults Test Test LocatlOli . Tract Approx. Test Appro.. Fill Pry' Moist. Soli Comp" Remarks No. Date No. Elev. Below Test Penslty Content Type action (9C.l%Req. unless noted) (ft) (ft) (pel) ('Yo) ('Yo) 655 08/27/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1273 8 116.8 7.5 1 91 656 08/27/02 LOT 99 24188.3 1274 8 118.2 7.4 1 92 657 08/27/02 LOT 100 24188.3 1269 8 120.4 7.0 1 94 658 08/27/02 LOT 100 24188.3 1270 9 117.7 8.0 1 92 659 08/27/02 LOT 91 24188.3 1290 BTM 110.2 20.9 3 91 660 08/27/02 LOT 19 24188 1230 BTM 113.8 8.9 3 94 661 08/27/02 LOT 23 24188 1236 BTM 118.1 8.9 1 92 662 08/27/02 LOT 22 24188 1239 BTM 115.7 7.4 1 90 663 08/27/02 RIVERADR" STA 18+50 24188 1265 BTM 119.6 7.B 1 93 664 08/27/02 LOT 19, SLOPE 24188 1228 BTM 115.8 9.0 8 96 95 % Req. 665 08/27/02 LYLESDR" STA 15+40 24188 1230 BTM 115.0 9.7 8 95 95% Req. 666 08/27/02 lOT 19, SLOPE 24188 122B 2 114.1 6.6 8 94 95% Req., Failed, See RT #666A 666A 08/27/02 lOT 19, SLOPE 24188 1228 2 117.3 8.4 3 97 95% Req., RT of #666 667 08/27/02 LOT 20 24188 1232 2 109.5 8.5 8 91 95%Req.,Failed, See RT #667 A B6lA 08/27/02 LOT 20 24188 1232 2 116.7 10.7 8 96 95% Aeq., RT of #667 668 08/27/02 LOT 69 24188-3 1281 2 106.3 9.7 8 B8 Failed, See RT #668A 668A 08/27/02 LOT 69 24188-3 1281 2 103.5 12.3 2 90 RT of #668 669 08/27/02 LOT 16 24188 1236 BTM 106.B 12.4 3 88 Native Bottom, 85 % Req. 670 08/27/02 LOT 17 24188 1231 BTM 110.1 12.9 3 91 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 671 08/27/02 LOT 20 24188 1234 4 115.2 9.7 B 95 672 08/27/02 LOT 21 24188 1234 BTM 114.4 14.9 3 95 673 08/27/02 LOT 20 24188 1237 4 118.0 12.5 3 9B 674 08/27/02 RIVERA DR., STA 19+52 24188 1239 3 114.8 9.4 8 95 675 OB/27/02 LOT 7B 24188-3 1267 17 113.3 11.8 3 94 676 08/27/02 LOT 80 24188.3 1282 10 120.0 9.3 1 94 677 08/27/02 LOT 68 24188-3 1285 4 98.6 17.3 2 86 Failed, See RT #677 A 677A 08/27/02 LOT 68 24188-3 1285 4 10B.5 14.7 2 95 RT of #677 67B 08/27/02 LYLES DR., STA 16+25 24188 1236 2 111.5 13.2 2 97 679 OB/27/02 LYLES DR., STA 15+40 24188 1238 4 112.5 13.3 2 98 Field Dens~y Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 26 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5\ Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFllE\1999181\99-112199112-53.tr24188.fdt I I , T~bl~ No.A-1, Fi~ld Density Test Results Test Test LO<:atIOfl Tract Apptox. Test Apptox. Fill Dry Moist. Soli Camp.. RelTiarks No. Date No. Elev. Below Test D~llslty Contel)t Type action (90% Req. "nl....noted) . (It) (It) (pel) (%) {%) . . 680 08/27/02 LOT 19 24188 1239 10 115.8 12.6 8 96 6S0i 08/28/02 LOT 19 24188 1239 10 115.8 12.6 8 96 681 08/28/02 LYLES DR.. LOTS 20 & 22 24188 1240 7 117.6 11.1 8 97 682 08/28/02 LOT 19 24188 1241 16 116.0 13.6 8 96 683 08/28/02 LOT 20 24188 1240 11 121.5 9.5 1 95 684 08/28/02 LYLES DR.. LOTS 19 & 23 24188 1242 8 119.1 9.4 1 93 685 08/28/02 LOT 19 24188 1244 18 123.2 8.4 1 96 686 08/28/02 LOT 22 24188 1240 5 114.9 13.4 8 95 687 08/28/02 LYLES DR., LOTS 21 & 22 24188 1242 4 117.4 13.2 8 97 688 08/28/02 LOT 20 24188 1245 20 116.5 12.9 8 96 689 08/28/02 LOT 19 24188 1242 16 121.4 9.4 1 95 690 08/28/02 LOT 75 24188-3 1240 8 121.9 9.9 1 95 691 08/28/02 LOT 77 24188-3 1268 4 121.2 9.0 1 95 692 08/28/02 LOT 79 24188-3 1271 2 122.0 8.9 1 95 693 08/28/02 LOT 80 24188.3 1276 3 119.9 7.8 1 94 694 08/28/02 LOT 19 24188 1246 16 121.5 7.5 1 95 695 08/28/02 LOT 23 24188 1242 7 122.3 8.1 1 96 696 08/28/02 LOT 20 24188 1240 7 115.9 12.9 8 96 697 08/28/02 Lor 21 24188 1240 8 116.6 13.2 8 96 698 08/28/02 LOT 69 24188-3 1283 4 110.6 11.8 8 91 699 08/28/02 lOT 68 24188.3 1284 8TM 97.9 23.1 2 86 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 700 08/28/02 LOT 67 24188-3 1286 2 102.9 20.8 2 90 701 08/28/02 LOT 90. SLOPE 24188-2 1208 6 114.6 14.5 3 95 702 08/28/02 LOT 92, SW CORNER OF 24188-2 1207 8 112.2 13.7 3 93 SLOPE 703 08/28/02 SUNNY MEADOWS, 24188.2 1205 6 108.7 16.7 3 90 LOT 92 @ SLOPE 704 08/28/02 LOT 93, SLOPE 24188-2 1223 7 113.4 9.9 8 94 705 08/28/02 LOT 92 24188-2 1214 8 107.5 15.9 2 94 706 08/28/02 LOT 93, NW CORNER 24188-2 1220 8 115.2 11.6 8 95 707 08/28/02 LOT 92. NW CORNER 24188-2 1209 9 118.1 8.6 1 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 27 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFICEIJOBFllE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I - Tabla No. A-1 , FialdDansity Tast Rasults T$st T""t Location Tract Approx. Test Appro~. FlU Dry MOist. SOil Comp- Remarks No. Date No. Elev. SerowTeSl Density Content Type action (90%Req. unless noted) (It) (ft) (pel) (%) (%) 708 08/28/02 LOT 92, SE CORNER 24188-2 1205 8 121.4 8.1 1 95 709 08/28/02 LOT 93. SLOPE 24188-2 1221 6 118.1 13.0 1 92 710 08/28/02 LOT 92. SLOPE 24188-2 1210 10 118.0 13.5 1 92 711 08/28/02 LOT 91, SLOPE 24188-2 1203 5 112.7 15.5 3 93 712 08/28/02 LOT 57 24188-3 1263 23 118.0 7.7 1 92 713 08/28/02 LOT 57 24188-3 1264 24 117.7 7.5 1 92 714 08/28/02 LOT 59 24188.3 1264 25 117.3 7.9 1 92 715 08/28/02 LOT 59 24188-3 1265 26 117.0 8.0 1 91 716 08/28/02 LOT 59 24188.3 1266 27 115.0 11.6 1 90 717 08/28/02 LOT 59 24188.3 1267 28 114.7 11.9 1 90 718 08/28/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1268 17 114.6 11.8 1 90 719 08/28/02 LOT 62 24188.3 1269 18 114.9 11.7 1 90 720 08/28/02 LOT 57 24188.3 1266 26 115.7 11.8 1 90 721 08/28/02 LOT 57 24188-3 1267 27 115.2 11.6 1 90 722 08/28/02 LOT 54 24188-3 1268 27 114.8 11.2 1 90 723 08/28/02 LOT 54 24188-3 1269 28 114.9 11.4 1 90 724 08/28/02 LOT 60 24188-3 1268 . 23 114.8 9.7 1 90 725 08/28/02 LOT 60 24188-3 1269 24 114.6 9.1 1 90 726 08/28/02 LOT 56 24188.3 1268 31 114.8 10.4 1 90 727 08/28/02 LOT 56 24188.3 1269 32 115.9 9.8 1 90 728 08/28/02 lOTS 62 & 55, LATERAL 24188.3 1269 19 115.0 9.0 1 90 729 08/28/02 lOTS 62 & 55, LATERAL 24188.3 1270 20 115.2 9.3 1 90 730 08/29/02 LOT 18 24188 1227 2 118.2 8.7 1 92 95% ReQ., Failed, See RT #730A 730A 08/29/02 lOTS 62 & 55, LATERAL 24188 1227 2 121.9 9.0 1 95 95% Req., RT of #730 731 08/29/02 LOT 16 24188 1222 2 119.0 8.8 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #731A 731A 08/29/02 LOT 16 24188 1222 2 122.6 9.1 1 96 95% Req., RT of #731 732 08/29/02 LOT 18 24188 1230 5 123.1 8.8 1 96 733 08/29/02 LOT 16 24188 1225 5 122.0 9.2 1 95 734 08/29/02 LOT 18 24188 1234 9 118.9 7.8 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #734A Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 28 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5?> Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results Test Test LQC1'itlon Tract Approx. Test Approx.FIU pry MOist. Soil Camp- Remarks No. Date . No. Elev. Below Test Density Content Type action (90% Req.'unless noted) . . (It) (It) (pel) (%) (%) 734A 08/29/02 LOT 18 24188 1234 9 122.3 9.2 1 96 95% Req., RT of #734 735 08/29/02 lOT 16 24188 1229 9 119.6 8.2 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT n735A 735A 08/29/02 lOT 16 24188 1229 9 121.6 9.8 1 95 95% Req., RT of #735 736 08/29/02 LOT 17 24188 1236 6 116.2 12.6 8 96 737 08/29/02 lOT 15 24188 1234 4 115.3 13.1 8 95 738 08/29/02 lOT 18 24188 1236 11 116.8 12.1 8 97 739 08/29/02 lOT 16 24188 1233 12 116.2 11.9 8 96 740 08/29/02 lOT 17 24188 1238 8 121.8 9.2 1 95 741 08/29/02 lOT 15 24188 1236 6 121.6 9.0 1 95 742 08/29/02 lOT 18 24188 1240 15 115.8 13.2 8 96 743 08/29/02 lOT 16 24188 1236 15 116.3 11.9 8 96 744 08/29/02 lOT 93 24188-2 1226 10 120.8 9.9 1 94 745 08/29/02 lOT 93, NW SLOPE 24188-2 1220 8 120.5 10.0 1 94 746 08/29/02 LOT 92, SW SLOPE 24188.2 1211 12 123.6 11.1 7 94 747 08/29/02 lOT 92 24188.2 1213 12 122.6 10.9 7 93 748 08/29/02 lOT 92 24188.2 1212 15 121.2 12.3 7 92 749 08/29/02 lOT 92 24188-2 1206 14 122.9 11.5 7 93 750 08/29/02 lOT 90 24188-2 1210 7 110.0 11.6 8 90 751 08/29/02 lOT 88 24188-2 1212 5 114.3 11.6 8 94 752 08/29/02 LOT 93 24188-2 1226 10 116.6 13.1 3 96 753 08/29/02 lOT 92 24188-2 1210 13 114.8 11.3 8 95 754 08/29/02 lOT 91 24188-2 1204 8TM 125.9 6.9 7 95 755 08/29/02 lOT 87 24188.2 1196 8TM 118.8 14.6 7 90 756 08/29/02 lOT 54 24188.3 1273 32 110.4 12.4 3 92 757 08/29/02 lOT 86 24188-2 1196 BTM 119.2 6.6 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #757 A 757A 08/29/02 lOT B6 24188.2 1196 BTM 111.7 B.l 3 92 95% Req., Failed, See RT #7578 757B 08/29/02 lOT 86 24188.2 1196 BTM 116.7 8.8 8 96 95% Req., RT of #757A 758 08/29/02 lOT 92 24188-2 1212 15 118.4 7.1 1 93 759 08/29/02 lOT 93 24188-2 1230 14 119.2 9.5 1 93 Field Dens~y Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 29 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt SA. I I TlIble No. A.t, Field Density Test R.esults Test T..t LoCation Tract Approx~ Test Approx. Fill Dry Moist. Soil Camp. Remarks No. Date No, . '"Elev;, Below Test Density Content TYP<' action (900/0Req. unlesS noted) . . (ft) (ftl (pel) (%) ('M 760 08/29/02 LOT86 24188.2 1209 8TM 114.1 13.7 3 95 761 08/29/02 LOT 59 24188.3 1269 29 110.7 12.4 3 92 762 08/29/02 LOT 60 24188.3 1271 32 116.8 6.4 1 91 763 08/29/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1270 19 111.7 14.6 3 92 764 08/29/02 LOT 61 24188-3 1271 26 112.8 9.1 8 93 765 08/29/02 LOT 57 24188.3 1268 33 108.6 10.2 8 90 766 08/29/02 LOT 87 24188.2 1200 3 119.6 10.3 8 99 767 08/29/02 LOT 89 24188-2 1202 BTM 123.4 7.3 1 96 768 08/29/02 LOT 87 24188-2 1202 5 124.1 7.6 1 97 769 08/29/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1203 7 114.8 11.3 8 95 770 08/30/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1281 18 118.2 9.7 1 92 771 08/30/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1282 19 118.0 12.2 1 92 772 08/30/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1276 27 116.6 B.7 1 91 773 08/30/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1277 28 116.8 9.0 1 91 774 08/30/02 LOT 55 24188.3 1274 34 114.6 9.7 1 90 775 08/30/02 LOT 55 24188.3 1275 35 115.0 9.2 1 90 776 08/30/02 LOT 53 24188-3 1279 27 116.2 7.7 1 91 777 08/30/02 LOT 53 24188-3 1280 28 115.8 8.4 1 90 778 08/30/02 LOT 15 24188 1239 9 123.0 8.2 1 96 779 08/30/02 LOT 17 24188 1240 12 121.6 9.2 1 95 780 08/30/02 LOT 16 24188 1241 13 122.4 8.8 1 96 781 08/30/02 LOT 18 24188 1243 16 121.9 9.9 1 95 782 08/30/02 LOT 16 24188 1243 15 115.6 1.2 8 96 783 08/30/02 LOT 18 24188 1245 18 116.2 11.2 8 96 784 08/30/02 LOT 20 24188 1256 31 116.6 12.6 8 96 785 08/30/02 LOT 16 24188 1245 17 121.7 9.2 1 95 786 08/30/02 LOT 18 24188 1248 20 122.3 9.0 1 96 787 08/30/02 LOT 20 24188 1258 33 123.1 7.9 1 96 788 08/30/02 BEHINO LOTS 85 & 86 24188-3 1276 3 116.4 10.9 1 91 95% Req., See RT #788A Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~'"'5 Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I . Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results Test Test Location Tract Approx. Test Appro.. Fill Dry MOIst. SOli Comp- Remarks No.' Date Elev; Below Test Density Content Type action .(90'YoReq. unless noted} No; (It} (It} (\>cfj (0/,) . (%) 788A 08/30/02 BEHIND LOTS 85 & 86 24188.3 1276 3 121.8 9.9 1 95 95% Req., RT of #788 789 08/30/02 BEHIND LOT B6 24188.3 1276 3 119.9 10.0 1 94 95% Req., See RT #789A 789A 08/30/02 BEHIND LOT B6 24188.3 1276 3 122.6 9.2 1 96 95% Req., RT of #789 790 08/30/02 LOT 15 24188 1244 14 121.3 8.8 1 95 791 08/30/02 LOT 17 24188 1250 22 122.6 8.2 1 96 792 08/30/02 LOT 87 24188-2 1205 7 108.5 5.6 8 90 95% Req., See RT #792A 792A 08/30/02 LOT 87 24188-2 1205 7 124.0 9.5 1 97 RT of #792 793 08/30/02 LOT 89 24188.2 1205 3 117.8 10.7 8 97 794 08/30/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1206 9 102.3 11.2 8 85 Failed, See RT #794A 794A 08/30/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1206 9 120.2 11.1 8 99 RT of #794 795 08/30/02 LOT 90 24188.2 1207 2 118.7 10.8 8 98 796 08/30102 LOT 93 24188-2 1223 13 118.5 10.7 1 93 797 08/30/02 LOT 92 24188-2 1215 18 123.2 8.6 1 96 798 08/30/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1213 10 125.0 9.8 7 95 799 08/30/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1211 6 120.0 11.1 7 91 800 08/30/02 LOT 87 24188.2 1208 10 122.1 7.5 1 95 801 08/30/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1210 11 116.4 10.6 8 96 802 08/30/02 LOT 92, SLOPE 24188.2 1213 15 112.7 13.6 3 93 803 08/30/02 LOT 92 24188.2 1207 BrM 113.5 6.9 1 89 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 804 08/30/02 LOT 57 24188-3 1273 33 114.7 12.6 3 95 805 08/30/02 LOT 55 24188-3 1276 36 113.7 11.3 3 94 806 08/30/02 LOT 53 24188-3 1280 28 114.4 12.9 3 95 807 08/30/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1276 25 109.4 16.5 3 90 808 08/30/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1282 26 108.8 15.5 3 90 809 08/30/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1282 19 114.1 13.5 3 94 810 08/30/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1283 20 113.6 14.5 3 94 811 08/30/02 LOT 66 24188.3 1286 20 113.9 14.2 3 94 812 08/30/02 LOT 66 24188-3 1287 21 113.0 14.0 3 93 813 08/30/02 LOT 67 24188-3 1287 21 113.6 13.0 3 94 Field DensilyTables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 31 I .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :$'" Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEW08FJLE\ 1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.1r24188.fdl I I Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results . . . Test TeSt Location Tract Appro". Test Appr~x. FlU Dry Moist. Soli Comp- Remarks N~. Date Ele:V; Below Test Density Content Typ~ action (00% floq. unl.... nQ1edl No. (ft) (ft) (pcf) (%) ('Yo) 814 08/30/02 LOT 67 24188.3 1288 22 113.6 13.5 3 94 815 08/30/02 LOT 69 24188-3 1286 20 108.6 16.0 3 90 816 08/30/02 LOT 69 24188.3 1287 21 108.8 16.2 3 90 817 09/03/02 LOT 92 24188.2 1214 11 117.0 10.6 1 91 818 09/03/02 LOT 87 24188.2 1208 12 114.7 8.1 1 90 819 09/03/02 lOT 68 24188-3 1290 24 115.6 7.1 1 90 820 09/03/02 LOT 68 24188.3 1291 25 116.4 7.0 1 91 821 09/03/02 LOT 66 24188-3 1290 24 110.0 14.5 3 91 822 09/03/02 LOT 66 24188-3 1291 25 108.6 16.3 3 90 823 09/03/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1286 23 108.8 12.7 3 90 824 09/03/02 LOT 64 24188.3 1287 24 109.7 12.9 3 91 825 09/03/02 LOT 62 24188-3 1279 28 109.0 11.9 3 90 826 09/03/02 LOT 62 24188.3 1280 29 109.2 121.1 3 90 827 09/03/02 LOT 60 24188-3 1273 31 111.8 14.7 3 92 828 09/03/02 LOT 60 24188.3 1274 32 113.5 14.2 3 94 829 09/03/02 LOT 89 24188-2 1208 10 118.9 9.3 1 93 830 09/03/02 LOT 92 24188-2 1220 17 120.0 9.6 1 94 831 09/03/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1252 27 118.2 7.4 1 92 832 09/03/02 LOT 33 24188.3 1253 28 118.6 7.6 1 93 833 09/03/02 LOT 35 24188.3 1249 17 115.4 5.7 1 90 834 09/03102 LOT 35 24188-3 1250 18 115.8 6.2 1 90 835 09/03/02 LOT 16 24188 1255 15 112.2 9.1 1 88 Failed, See RT #835A 835A 09/03/02 LOT 16 24188 1255 15 118.9 10.3 1 93 RT of #835 836 09/03/02 LOT 17 24188 1256 18 113.5 6.4 1 89 Failed, See RT #836A 836A 09/03/02 LOT 17 24188 1256 18 116.1 12.2 1 91 RT of #836 837 09/03/02 LOT 15 24188 1259 18 117.4 7.2 1 92 838 09/03/02 LOT 14 24188 1256 14 120.4 9.6 1 94 839 09/03/02 LOT 16 24188 1259 17 117.9 9.8 1 92 840 09/03/02 DAHL DR.. LOT 15 24188 1247 8 116.7 9.7 1 91 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 32 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~\ Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdl I I Table No, A-i, Field Density Test Results Tes! Test Location Tract Approx. Test Appro.. fill pry Moist. Soli Comp.. Remarks No. Da,~. No, Elev. lIelow Te.t Density Content Type action (Q()% Req. unl.... noted) (It) (It) (~Cf) (%) (%) 841 09/03/02 KEYWAY, LOT 10 24188 1231 2 116.2 9.9 3 96 842 09/03/02 KEYWAY, LOT 12 24188 1228 3 119.5 11.0 3 99 843 09/03/02 OAHLOR., LOT 26 24188 1247 10 113.7 17.1 3 94 844 09/03/02 KEYWAY, LOT 11 24188 1230 4 115.8 11.8 1 90 95% Req., Failed, See RT #844A 844A 09/03/02 KEYWAY, lOT 11 24188 1230 4 114.9 9.9 3 95 AT of #844 845 09/04/02 DAHL DR., LOT 12 24188 1230 9 111.6 10.2 3 92 846 09/04/02 DAHL DR., lOT 14 24188 1240 7 121.4 7.4 1 95 847 09/04/02 LOT 84 24188-3 1289 25 113.3 15.4 3 94 848 09/04/02 LOT 82 24188.3 1289 10 116.1 11.2 1 91 849 09/04/02 LOT 83 24188-3 1291 12 110.1 10.1 3 91 850 09/04/02 LOT 85 24188.3 1292 13 t 12.0 9.3 3 93 851 09/04/02 LOT 29 24188.3 1240 8TM 109.4 7.8 3 90 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 852 09/04/02 lOT 29 24188-3 1233 8TM 112.6 16.3 1 88 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 853 09/04/02 LOT 29 24188.3 1248 8TM 114.2 14.8 1 89 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 854 09/04/02 LOT26 24188-3 1230 8TM 114.3 6.8 1 89 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 855 09/04/02 LOT 29 24188.3 1255 8TM 99.6 27.7 2 87 Native Bottom, 85 % Req. 856 09/04/02 LOT 29 24188.3 1255 8TM 101.2 27.0 2 88 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 857 94/02 LOTS 82 & 83 24188-3 1294 12 117.2 9.0 1 92 858 09/04/02 LOT 86 24188.3 1296 24 112.0 10.4 3 93 859 09/04/02 LOT 89 24188.2 1217 15 122.4 9.9 1 96 860 09/04/02 LOT 91 24188-2 1217 13 115.0 9.3 1 90 861 09/04/02 LOT 86 24188.2 1216 6 115.6 9.7 1 90 862 09/04/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1217 15 114.7 12.0 8 95 863 09/04/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1217 13 115.4 11.7 8 95 864 09/04/02 LOT 92 24188-2 1219 15 120.6 11.2 1 94 865 09/04/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1219 15 118.4 12.1 1 93 866 09/04/02 LOT 28 24188.2 1260 34 113.7 14.5 8 94 867 09/04/02 LOT 30 24188-2 1259 24 113.3 15.1 8 94 868 09/04/02 LOTS 27 & 28 24188-2 1258 30 113.9 11.1 8 94 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 33 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt 5e I I I Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 34 I . Table No.A-1, Fie.ld Density Test Results Test Test Location" Tract Approx. TQ$t: App,ox. Fill pry Moist. Soli Camp- Remarks No. Date Elev. Below Test Density Content Type action (90% Roq. unieosnoted) No. (ft) (ft) (pet) (%) (%) , 869 09/04/02 LOT 29 24188-2 1260 25 113.7 12.0 8 94 870 09/04/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1254 29 115.3 7.9 1 90 871 09/04/02 LOT 33 24188-3 1255 30 115.5 7.4 1 90 872 09/04/02 LOT 30 24188 1255 9 116.9 13.8 1 91 873 09/04/02 LOT 30 24188 1256 10 115.3 14.1 1 90 874 09/04/02 LOT 35 24188.3 1251 19 120.4 9.8 1 94 875 09/04/02 LOT 35 24188.3 1252 20 120.5 9.9 1 94 876 09/04/02 LOT 60 24188 1252 17 120.6 10.3 1 94 877 09/04/02 LOT 60 24188 1253 10 118.2 10.5 1 92 878 09/04/02 LOT 36 24188.3 1254 22 114.9 12.1 1 90 879 09/04/02 LOT 36 24188-3 1255 23 114.8 12.0 1 90 880 09/04/02 LOT 59 24188 1252 2 118.4 8.6 1 93 881 09/04/02 LOT 59 24188 1253 3 118.9 8.8 1 93 882 09/04/02 LOTS 33 & 62 24188 1254 29 118.7 12.0 1 93 883 09/04/02 LOTS 33 & 62 24188 1255 30 118.0 12.4 1 92 884 09/04/02 lOT 31 24188 1257 11 121.0 5.9 1 95 885 09/04/02 LOT 31 24188 1258 13 120.0 5.9 1 94 886 09/05/02 LOT 83 24188-3 1290 20 121.4 8.3 1 95 887 09/05/02 LOT 84 24188-3 1280 13 117.9 13.6 1 92 888 09/05/02 LOT 85 24188.3 1295 15 117.3 12.1 1 92 889 09/05/02 LOT 86 24188-3 1299 23 118.8 9.2 1 93 890 09/05/02 LOT 29 24188.2 1262 30 108.6 149.0 3 90 891 09/05/02 LOTS 28 24188.2 1260 35 110.3 14.3 3 91 892 09/05/02 LOTS 28 24188.2 1260 10 111.4 18.6 3 92 893 09/05/02 LOT 27 24188-2 1263 18 108.9 13.9 3 90 894 09/05/02 LOTS 27 & 28 24188.2 1262 22 113.7 11.7 3 94 895 09/05/02 LOT 29 @ STREET 24188-2 1262 22 114.1 18.0 3 94 896 09/05/02 LOT 29 @ STREET 24188.2 1262 23 108.5 16.5 3 90 897 09/05/02 LOT 30 24188-2 1263 22 110.3 13.5 3 91 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~'\ Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFfCEUOBFrLE\ 1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I Table No. A-1, Field DellsityTestResl.llls Test Test Location Tta.;! ApprQX. Test Appro.. Fill pry Moist: Soli Comp- Remarks Elev. Below Test Density Content action No, Date No. (It) (It) (pC!) (%) Type (%) (90% Req. unless noted) :. 898 09/05/02 LOT 85 24188.3 1299 19 122.8 8.7 7 93 899 09/05/02 LOT 82 24188-3 1293 14 114.4 11.8 8 95 900 09/05/02 LOT 83 24188.3 1294 24 111.4 14.1 8 92 901 09/05/02 LOT 86 24188-3 1302 26 113.7 13.3 8 94 902 09/05/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1262 18 110.1 14.6 3 91 903 09/05/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1263 19 109.0 15.1 3 90 904 09/05/02 LOT 10 24188-3 1265 38 109.8 15.2 3 91 905 09/05/02 LOT 10 24188.3 1266 39 110.2 15.5 3 91 906 09/05/02 LOT 12 24188.3 1267 28 108.9 15.3 3 90 907 09/05/02 LOT 12 24188.3 1268 29 109.0 15.0 3 90 908 09/05/02 LOTS 58 & 59 24188 1255 5 115.9 9.0 1 91 909 09/05/02 LOTS 58 & 59 24188 1256 6 116.2 9.4 1 91 910 09/05/02 lOTS 34 & 35 24188 1254 9 116.8 9.9 1 91 911 09/05/02 LOTS 34 & 35 24188 1255 10 118.7 9.2 1 93 912 09/05/02 LOT 67 24188 1256 BTM 123.6 7.2 1 97 913 09/05/02 LOT 69 24188 1257 BTM 116.1 8.5 1 91 914 09/06/02 LOTS 86 & 87 24188.2 1214 13 119.2 7.0 1 93 915 09/06/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1216 6 120.2 7.0 1 94 916 09/06/02 LOTS 88 & 87 24188.2 1217 17 116.1 9.0 1 90 917 09/06/02 GREENE CIR. 24188.2 1203 BTM 107.4 7.7 3 89 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 918 09/06/02 GREENE CIR. 24188-2 1216 BTM 114.0 6.9 3 94 919 09/06/02 LOT 94 24188-2 1216 BTM 111.1 9.9 3 92 920 09/06/02 LOT 95 24188-2 1215 BTM 109.3 13.5 3 90 921 09/06/02 LOT 89 24188-2 1218 16 118.6 11.4 1 93 922 09/06/02 LOT 91 24188-2 1220 14 124.1 8.3 1 97 923 09/06/02 LOT 92 24188.2 1220 16 117.0 10.6 1 92 924 09/06/02 LOT 94 24188.2 1214 3 120.9 10.5 1 95 925 09/06/02 LOT 95 24188-2 1215 2 123.9 10.0 1 97 926 09/06/02 LOT 90 24188.3 1293 BTM 102.3 19.6 8 85 Failed, See RT #926A Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 35 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consuftants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\ 1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.1r24188.fdt ,"0 I I Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 36 I I , Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results Test Test" Location- Tract Approx. Test APprox. Fill Dry Moist. Soil Comp- Remarks Elev. BeloW'. Test Density Content action No. Date No. (ft) (ft) (!>Cf) ('Yo) Type (ltM (90% Req. uoless noto<l) 926A 09/11/02 LOT 90 24188-3 1293 8TM 114.3 13.0 8 95 RT of #926 927 09/06/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1293 8TM 102.9 18.5 8 85 Failed, See RT #927A 927A 09/11/02 LOT 99 24188-3 1293 8TM 114.2 12.6 8 94 RT of #927 928 09/06/02 LOT 86 24188-3 1300 25 104.8 19.1 8 87 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 929 09/06/02 LOT 85 24188-3 1300 17 103.7 18.7 8 86 Native Bottom, 85 % Req. 930 09/06/02 LOT 83 24188-3 1299 8TM 102.1 19.9 8 84 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 931 09/06/02 LOT 48 24188-3 1270 8TM 110.2 17.2 8 91 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 932 09/06/02 LOT 45 24188-3 1267 8TM 120.2 9.0 1 94 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 933 09/06/02 LOT 48 24188.3 1272 2 111.3 14.6 8 92 934 09/06/02 LOT 45 24188-3 1269 2 120.0 9.2 1 94 935 09/06/02 LOT 35 24188-3 1257 12 120.6 10.1 1 94 936 09/06/02 LOT 35 24188-3 1258 13 121.2 9.3 1 95 937 09/06/02 LOT 26 24188 1230 1 116.0 9.3 1 91 938 09/06/02 LOT 26 24188 1231 2 116.2 9.5 1 91 939 09/06/02 MIDDLE OF DAHL DR. 24188 1236 2 116.9 8.5 1 91 940 09/06/02 LOT 25 24188 1237 3 116.7 8.7 1 91 941 09/06/02 LOT 44 24188-3 1255 10 118.8 12.3 1 93 942 09/06/02 LOT 44 24188-3 1256 11 118.6 12.8 1 93 943 09/06/02 LOT 43 24188-3 1258 13 117.9 13.1 1 92 944 09/06/02 LOT 43 24188-3 1259 14 118.3 13.3 1 92 945 09/09/02 LOT 84 24188.3 1300 30 113.6 13.5 8 94 946 09/09/02 LOT 41 24188-3 1266 1 121.3 9.8 1 95 947 09/09/02 LOT 43 24188-3 1268 22 116.4 10.7 1 91 948 09/09/02 LOT 24 24188 1241 1 113.4 11.2 8 94 949 09/09/02 LOT 25 24188 1243 3 119.6 10.0 1 93 950 09/09/02 LOT 27 24188 1237 8 116.1 10.5 8 96 951 09/09/02 LOT 26 24188 1234 10 113.9 10.0 8 94 952 09/09/02 LOT 49 24188.3 1278 8TM 116.7 9.5 1 91 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 953 09/09/02 LOT 49 24188-3 1279 2 120.1 10.8 1 94 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (..\ Converse Consultants CCIENTiOFFICEIJOBFllE\ 1 999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr241 BB.fdt I I I T,.ble No. A.1, Field Density Test Results . . Approx. Test App,ox."FIU Dry Moist. ComF>- Test Test L$tloo Tract 5011 Remarks No. Date Elev. Below Test Density Content Type action (90% Req. unless noted) No. (ft) (ft) (pC!) (%) ('/0) 954 09/09/02 LOT 46 24188-3 1270 2 109.8 14.8 8 91 955 09/09/02 LOT 47 24188.3 1271 4 109.7 15.8 8 91 956 09/09/02 LOT 81 24188-3 1282 BTM 100.5 25.8 8 83 Native Bottom, 85 % Req. 957 09/09/02 LOT 81 24188-3 1284 2 109.9 14.2 8 91 958 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR., 24188.2 120B 3 121.6 7.2 1 95 95% Req. FRONT OF LOTS 88 & 89 959 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR., 24188-2 1209 4 122.4 7.9 1 96 95% Req. FRONT OF LOTS 88 & B9 960 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR. & 24188.2 1211 3 122.2 10.9 1 96 95% Req. DELTA WAY 961 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR. & 24188-2 1212 4 121.1 11.6 1 95 95% Req. DELTA WAY 962 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR. 24188.2 1211 6 121.5 11.2 1 95 95% Req. FRONT OF LOTS 87 & 88 963 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR., 24188-2 1212 7 121.2 11.4 1 95 95% Req. FRONT OF LOTS 87 & 88 964 09/09/02 LOT 95 24188-2 1213 3 121.6 10.7 1 95 95% Req. 965 09/09/02 LOT 95 24188.2 1214 4 121.9 10.8 1 95 95% Req. 966 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CtR., 24188.2 1214 9 116.4 9.5 1 91 FRONT OF LOTS 87 & 88 967 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR., 24188-2 1215 BTM 117.3 10.2 1 92 Native Bottom, 85% FRONT OF LOTS 87 & 88 Req. 968 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIA. & 24188-2 1214 6 120.B 9.8 1 94 DELTA WAY 969 09/09/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIA. & 24188-2 1215 7 121.0 10.0 1 95 DELTA WAY 970 09/09/02 LOT 88 24188.2 1214 2 122.6 9.3 1 96 95 % Req. 971 09/09/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1215 3 122.8 9.0 1 96 972 09/09/02 LOT 20 24188 1258 33 116.5 13.1 1 91 973 09/09/02 LOT 75 24188-3 1265 33 118.8 8.1 1 93 974 09/09/02 lOT 77 24188-3 1270 11 117.2 13.9 1 92 975 09/09/02 LOT 79 24188-3 1279 10 116.8 11.9 1 91 976 09/09/02 LOT 43 24188 1265 6 117.6 11.8 1 92 977 09/09/02 LOT 16 24188 1253 17 114.3 14.2 8 94 978 09/10/02 LOT 44 24188.3 1265 20 119.9 10.3 1 94 979 09/10/02 LOT 17 24188 1245 11 112.7 10.9 8 93 980 09/1 0/02 LOT 14 24188 1255 17 115.4 12.6 8 95 981 09/1 0/02 LOT 13 24188 1257 18 117.0 9.6 1 91 982 09/10/02 LOT 25 24188 1243 2 110.2 12.9 8 91 95% Req. Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 37 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "'z; Converse Consultants CCIENT'.OFFICEIJOBFILEI1999\81\99-112\99112-53.1r24188.fdI I I Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 38 I I , Table No. A.1, Field Density Test Results I . i\Pprox. Test Approx. Fill Dry Moist; COITlP" rest Test L.oCatlon Tract Soli RemarkS No. Date No, Elev; Below Test Density Cootent TYPe action (90'/0 Req.unles. noted) (ft) (ft) (pel) (%) ('/0) 983 09/1 0102 LOT 27 24188 1243 8 114.5 14.5 8 95 984 09/10/02 LOT 85 24188-3 1301 17 109.0 18.8 11 92 985 09/10/02 KEYWAY @ LOT 11 24188 1229 BTM 111.9 12.3 8 92 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 986 09/1 0/02 KEYWAY @ LOT 9 24188 1224 BTM 109.8 15.6 8 91 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 987 09/10/02 LOT 88 24188.2 1216 4 122.0 7.1 1 95 988 09/10/02 GREENE CIR.. IN FRONT OF 24188-2 1218 6 123.4 6.9 1 96 LOT 86 989 09/10/02 LOT 95 24188.2 1217 7 119.6 11.7 1 93 990 09/10/02 GREENE CIR., 24188-2 1216 10 118.3 12.8 1 92 IN FRONT OF LOT 87 991 09/10/02 GREENE CIR., 24188-2 1218 4 123.4 6.5 1 96 IN FRONT OF LOT 89 992 09/10/02 GREENE CIR.. 24188.2 1219 8 120.9 7.6 1 94 IN FRONT OF LOT 86 993 09/1 0/02 DELTA WAY, 24188.2 1219 10 123.4 7.5 1 96 LOTS 95 & 96 994 09/10/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1220 8 125.1 7.6 6 94 995 09/1 0/02 GREENE CIR., 24188-2 1217 14 125.4 8.6 6 94 IN FRONT OF LOT 95 996 09/1 0/02 LOTS 85 & 86 24188-2 1219 6 126.5 8.1 6 95 997 09/10/02 LOT 94 24188.2 1221 3 121.8 8.0 1 95 998 09/1 0/02 GREENE CIR.. IN FRONT OF 24188-2 1218 4 120.1 8.5 1 94 LOTS 94 & 95 999 09/11/02 LOT 86 24188-3 1302 30 113.4 11.8 8 94 1000 09/11/02 LOT 85 24188-3 1301 18 110.3 13.8 8 91 1001 09/11/02 LOT 8 24188.3 1264 4 106.6 16.5 11 90 1002 09/11/02 LOT 9 24188.3 1264 20 108.0 17.3 11 92 1003 09/11/02 LOT 8 24188-3 1266 6 117.4 10.7 1 92 1004 09/11/02 LOT 9 24188-3 1266 22 117.7 9.9 1 92 1005 09/11/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR. & 24188.2 1223 18 114.6 11.6 1 90 DELTA WAY 1006 09/11/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR. & 24188-2 1224 19 114.7 11.2 1 90 DELTA WAY 1007 09/11/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR.. 24188-2 1223 19 115.4 10.9 1 90 FRONT OF LOTS 87 & 88 1008 09/11/02 MIDDLE, GREENE CIR.. 24188-2 1224 2 115.9 10.6 1 91 FRONT OF LOTS 87 & 88 1009 09/11/02 DELTA WAY 24188.2 1224 14 122.9 11.6 1 96 1010 09/11/02 DELTA WAY@ LOT 96 24188-2 1222 4 120.0 10.6 1 94 1011 09/11/02 GREENE CIR. @ LOT 91 24188-2 1224 4 116.3 13.7 1 91 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,~ Converse Consultants CCJENT\OFFICEIJOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I Table No. A.1, FfeldDensity Test Results Test Test Location Tract Approx~ TeSt Approx. Fill DI'\f Molst. Soil Co~P" Remarks No. Oate Elev. BelowTest Density Content TyPQ action (90% Req.unl~s noted) No. (It) (It) (~ (0/.) ("/0) 1012 09/11/02 DELTA WAY@LOT94 24188-2 1224 9 117.0 10.5 1 91 1013 09/11/02 LOT 86 24188-3 1304 32 99.5 21.6 11 84 Failed -II; 1014 09/11/02 LOT 85 24188-3 1302 19 99.9 21.3 11 85 Failed II- 1015 09/11/02 LOT 84 24188-3 1300 32 105.0 17.2 11 89 Failed II- 1016 09/11/02 LOT 83 24188-3 1298 30 105.1 16.5 11 89 Failed .. 1017 09/11/02 LOT 100 24188-3 1271 FG 108.2 10.4 1 85 Failed .. 1018 09/11/02 LOT 99 24188.3 1275 FG 106.1 12.8 1 82 Failed * 1019 09/11/02 LOT 98 24188-3 1279 FG 138.3 6.0 1 N/A Not Valid 1020 09/11/02 LOT 98 24188-3 1279 FG 108.1 8.2 1 84 Failed ... 1021 09/11/02 LOT 97 24188.3 1283 FG 103.5 6.6 1 81 Failed ... 1022 09/11/02 LOT 96 24188.3 1286 FG 115.3 5.7 1 90 1023 09/12/02 LOT 1 24188-3 1266 FG 117.2 4.4 1 92 1024 09/12/02 LOT 2 24188.3 1267 FG 111.6 9.0 3 92 1025 09/12/02 LOT 3 24188.3 1268 FG 114.1 7.0 1 89 Failed, See RT #1025A 1025A 09/12/02 LOT 3 24188-3 1268 FG 118.2 9.2 1 92 RT of #1025 1026 09/12/02 LOT 4 24188-3 1269 FG 115.2 5.1 1 90 1027 09/12/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1269 FG 113.5 5.2 1 89 Failed, See RT #1027A 1027A 09/12/02 LOT 5 24188-3 1269 FG 116.6 5.2 1 91 RT of #1027 1028 09/12/02 LOT 6 24188-3 1268 FG 117.3 7.2 1 92 1029 09/12/02 LOT 7 24188.3 1268 FG 119.0 6.6 1 93 1030 09/12/02 LOT 10, NORTH SLOPE 24188 1227 2 118.7 9.0 1 93 1031 09/12/02 LOT 11, NORTH SLOPE 24188 1229 4 114.8 9.8 1 90 1032 09/12/02 LOT 78 24188.3 1277 4 109.8 16.8 8 91 1033 09/12/02 LOT 79 24188.3 1277 2 110.8 10.8 8 92 1034 09/12/02 LOT 76 24188.3 1269 34 111.8 10.8 8 92 1035 09/12/02 LOT 75 24188-3 1263 36 113.4 9.3 8 94 1036 09/13/02 LOT 17 24188 1255 21 123.6 8.2 1 97 1037 09/13/02 LOT 19 24188 1259 29 117.2 8.0 1 92 1038 09/13/02 LOT 14 24188 1250 25 115.5 8.9 1 90 Field Densay Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 39 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \9g.112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt GA I I , Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results , Test ,Test Location Tract Approx. Test Approx.FIII Dry Moist. Soli Camp. Remarks No. Date No. EIEW; Below Test Density Content Type action (90% Reg. unless noted) (ft) (11) (pel) (%) (%) 1039 09/13/02 LOT 15 24188 1252 13 111.0 11.0 8 92 1040 09/13/02 LOT 10 24188 1246 5 119.5 8.2 1 93 1041 09/13102 LOT 10 24188 1246 5 119.8 8.6 1 94 1042 09/12/02 LOT 84 24188.2 1212 BTM 119.1 8.B 1 93 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1043 09/12/02 LOT 86 24188-2 1214 2 121.9 7.4 1 95 1044 09/12/02 GREENE CIA. & 24188-2 1212 BTM 116.0 8.9 1 91 Native Bottom, 85% BURNETT WAY Req. 1045 09/12/02 GREENE CIR. & 24188.2 1214 2 121.8 8.5 1 95 BURNETT WAY 1046 09112/02 LOT 94 24188-2 1227 12 122.3 9.2 1 96 1047 09/12102 GREENE CIR. @ LOT 88 24188-2 1226 7 117.6 9.9 l' 92 1048 09112102 GREENE CIR. @ LOT 88 24188-2 1225 13 120.2 10.2 1 94 1049 09/12/02 GREENE CIR. & 24188-2 1224 19 116.8 11.3 1 91 DELTA WAY 1050 09/12/02 LOT 15 24188 1247 8 111.9 11.1 8 93 AT of #1051 1051 09/12/02 LOT 16 24188 1249 20 100.0 20.9 8 B3 Failed, See RT #1050 1052 09112/02 LOT 9, SLOPE 24188 1230 5 115.8 10.8 1 91 1053 09112/02 LOT 10. SLOPE 24188 1229 6 116.5 10.2 1 91 1054 09/12102 LOT 10, SLOPE 24188 1232 7 116.9 11.2 1 91 1055 09/12102 LOT 11, SLOPE 24188 1233 4 120.2 8.5 1 94 1056 09/13/02 GREENE CIR., STA 13+50 24188-2 1222 4 120.9 10.6 1 95 1057 09/13/02 GREENE CIR., SrA 14+50 24188.2 1222 4 124.2 8.0 5 95 1058 09/13/02 DELTA WAY, STA 14+50 24188-2 1226 11 117.7 10.2 1 92 1059 09/13/02 LOT 94 24188-2 1228 13 125.7 6.3 5 96 1060 09/13/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1230 21 116.8 9.8 1 91 1061 09113/02 LOT 87 24188-2 1228 14 123.9 6.6 5 95 1062 09/16/02 LOT 19 24188 1259 30 109.9 10.0 8 91 1063 09116102 LOT 18 24188 1260 30 110.1 11.3 8 91 1064 09116/02 LOT 12 24188 1256 6 114.5 12.2 8 95 1065 09/16/02 LOT 13 24188 1257 20 113.2 13.0 8 94 1066 09116/02 LOT 20 24188.3 1278 28 116.0 9.8 1 91 1067 09/16/02 LOT 20 24188-3 1280 26 117.3 8.2 1 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~.,. Converse Consultants CCIENTIOFF1CE\JOBF1LE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I Table No. A-1. Field Density TeslResults . Approx; Test. Appro.. Fill [lry Moist. Compo Test Test locittlon Tract Soli B,emarks No. [late No. Elev. Below Test ll~"slty Content Type action {900/0 Rect. unless noted) lff) (ft) (pel) l%j (%) 1068 09/16/02 LOT 21 24188-3 1280 11 117.3 6.4 1 92 1069 09/16/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1272 30 109.2 14.7 11 93 1070 09/16/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1274 24 109.1 15.5 11 93 1071 09/16102 LOT 13 24188-3 1268 4 120.3 12.6 1 94 1072 09/16/02 LOT 13 24188-3 1272 4 118.8 11.2 1 93 1073 09/16/02 lOT 12 24188.3 1270 35 113.1 12.8 8 93 1074 09116/02 LOT 12 24188-3 1272 33 116.8 12.3 1 91 1075 09/16/02 LOT 95 24188.2 1228 17 118.7 8.4 1 93 1076 09/16/02 LOT 95 24188-2 1230 19 117.3 8.4 1 92 1077 09/16102 GREENE CIR. 24188.2 1227 13 115.0 10.9 1 90 1078 09/16/02 GREENE CIA. 24188-2 1228 14 116.8 9.9 1 91 1079 09/16/02 LOT 89 24188.2 1228 16 118.7 10.4 1 93 1080 09/16/02 LOT 87 24188.2 1227 29 119.3 11.0 1 93 1081 09/16/02 LOT 85 24188-2 1217 5 115.8 12.1 8 96 1082 09116/02 LOT 83 24188.2 1216 6 116.3 11.8 8 96 1083 09/16/02 LOT 10 24188 1246 4 119.1 9.2 1 93 1084 09/16102 LOT 10 24188 1248 6 119.8 9.7 1 93 1085 09117/02 DELTA WAY 24188-2 1221 2 114.4 18.1 3 95 1086 09/17/02 lOT 83 24188-2 1217 4 112.6 10.0 3 93 95% Req., Failed, See Rr #1 086A 1087 09/17/02 LOT 82 24188-2 1218 6 112.5 8.3 3 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #1087A 1088 09/17/02 LOT 81 24188-2 1221 2 114.2 7.4 3 94 95% Req., Failed, See RT #1088A 1089 09/17/02 LOT 80 24188.2 1224 2 118.8 7.6 1 93 95% Req., Failed, See RT #1 089A 1090 09/17/02 LOT 95 24188-2 1232 21 116.5 8.7 1 91 1091 09/17/02 LOT 95 24188-2 1234 23 117.4 9.2 1 92 1092 09/17/02 LOT 94 24188-2 1232 17 114.9 10.8 1 90 1093 09/17/02 LOT 89 24188-2 1230 18 116.8 9.8 1 91 1094 09/17/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1231 22 120.9 8.9 1 94 1095 09/17/02 GREENE CIR" 24188.2 1228 7 117.0 9.0 1 91 LOTS 93 & 91 1096 09/17/02 LOT 85 24188-2 1220 8 116.0 12.9 8 96 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\ 1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.1r24188.fdt ~(,- . I I. . . Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results .. MOist. Test Test Location Tract APprox. Test APprox. Fill Dry Soli Comp- Remarks No. Date, No. Elev. Below! est Density Content TYPe acnon {90%"Req. unless rioted) (It) (It) . (pcfJ (0/0) (%) 1097 09/17/02 LOT 83 24188-2 1224 14 115.8 13.2 8 96 1098 09/17/02 LOT 57 24188 1257 2 116.0 12.2 1 91 1099 09/17/02 LOT 37 24188.3 1261 4 117.7 11.2 1 92 1100 09/17/02 LOT 43 24188.3 1269 23 112.5 12.2 8 93 1101 09/17/02 LOT 40 24188.3 1267 1 112.8 11.1 8 93 1102 09/17/02 LOT 42 24188-3 1270 18 116.9 9.1 1 91 1103 09/17/02 LOT 39 24188.3 1266 3 115.0 11.8 1 90 1104 09/17/02 LOT 69 24188-3 1287 2 118.3 11.2 1 92 1105 09/17/02 LOT 69 24188.3 1289 4 117.4 10.6 1 92 1106 09/18/02 LOT 53 24188 1266 8TM 115.4 13.6 1 90 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1107 09/18/02 LOT 40 24188.3 1268 2 116.2 13.4 1 91 1108 09/18/02 LOT 38 24188-3 1262 2 114.9 13.7 1 90 1109 09/18/02 LOT 38 24188.3 1264 4 115.8 11.0 1 91 1110 09/18/02 LOT 56 24188 1257 8TM 110.2 13.8 8 91 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1111 09/18/02 LOT 56 24188 1261 4 114.0 14.0 8 94 1112 09/18/02 LOT 54 24188 1264 2 113.4 14.3 8 94 1113 09/18/02 LOT 54 24188 1266 4 112.0 14.2 8 93 1114 09/18/02 LOT 33, SOUTH SLOPE 24188 1247 8TM 102.0 9.0 1 80 Min. 100 pef Dry Density Required 1115 09/18/02 LOT 32, SOUTH SLOPE 24188 1247 8TM 96.4 12.3 1 75 Failed * 1116 09/18/02 LOT 6, SOUTH SLOPE 24188 1257 8TM 95.6 11.7 1 75 Failed * 1117 09/18/02 LOT 4, SOUTH SLOPE 24188 1257 8TM 110.6 9.2 1 86 Min. tOO pef Dry Density Required 1118 09/18/02 LOT 2, SOUTH SLOPE 24188 1256 8TM 102.4 9.5 1 80 Min. 100 pef Dry Density Required 1119 09/19/02 LOT 52 24188 1267 8TM 116.8 9.0 1 91 1120 09/19/02 LOT 52 24188 1269 2 117.4 7.6 1 92 1121 09/19/02 LOT 50 24188 1272 2 112.6 11.7 8 93 1122 09/19/02 LOT 50 24188 1274 4 112.9 13.0 8 93 1123 09/19/02 LOT 17 24188.3 1276 2 114.8 10.5 1 90 1124 09/19/02 LOT 16 24188-3 1277 4 115.8 8.7 1 91 1125 09/20/02 LOT 64 24188 1259 FG 110.7 7.7 8 92 Field DensayTables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 42 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I tP"'\ Converse Consuttants GCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFllE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt I I Field Dens~y Tables Newland Homes Tract2~188 March 6. 2003 Page 43 I Tabl~~(),A-1, .. Fie.ld Density Test Resl.llts . '. Appro", T_ Appro.. Fill Test Test ldeatlOri Tract Dry Mol~ Soli Cornp- Remarks No. Oate< No. Elev. BelowTest Density Content TYpe action (900/. ll.eq. vnlessnote<l) . (ft) (ft) (pel) ..' (0/.) ('Yo) 1126 09/20/02 LOT 65 24188 1259 FG 109.5 7.4 8 91 1127 09/20/02 LOT 66 24188 1259 FG 111.2 8.4 8 92 1128 09/20/02 LOT 67 24188 1258 FG 117.2 6.2 8 97 1129 09/20/02 LOT 68 24188 1258 FG 126.0 4.8 1 98 1130 09/20/02 LOT 69 24188 1259 FG 120.9 3.8 1 95 1131 09/20/02 LOT 70 24188 1257 FG 116.7 3.4 1 91 1132 09/20/02 LOT 71 24188 1257 FG 121.2 5.1 1 95 1133 09/18/02 LOT 89 24188.2 1233 31 118.5 9.2 1 93 1134 09/18/02 LOT 87 24188-2 1230 32 120.2 9.0 1 94 1135 09/18/02 LOT 85 24188.2 1226 11 116.2 12.6 8 96 1136 09/18/02 LOT 83 24188-2 1226 15 115.6 12.9 8 96 1137 09/18/02 LOT 84 24188-2 1228 16 117.3 10.2 1 92 1138 09/18/02 GREENE CIR., LOT 98 24188-2 1225 12 119.2 9.2 1 93 1139 09/18/02 LOT 98 24188-2 1228 2 112.6 12.5 8 93 1140 09/18/02 LOT 79 24188.2 1227 2 115.5 13.6 8 96 1141 09/18/02 LOT 81 24188-2 1224 3 113.5 16.2 11 96 1142 09/18/02 LOT 78 24188.2 1232 2 114.2 14.9 11 97 1143 09/18/02 LOT 85 24188-2 1227 15 117.2 9.0 1 92 1144 09/18/02 GREENE CIA. 24188.2 1227 14 110.9 14.0 8 92 1145 09/18/02 LOT 87 24188-2 1234 36 113.2 13.8 8 94 1146 09/18/02 LOT 83 24188-2 1228 18 114.6 12.6 8 95 1147 09119/02 LOT 81 24188-2 1230 9 112.8 16.6 11 96 1148 09/19/02 LOT 81 24188-2 1232 11 113.4 15.4 11 96 1149 09/19/02 LOT 77 24188.2 1237 8TM 116.2 10.2 1 91 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1150 09/19/02 LOT 77 24188.2 1239 2 116.4 9.9 1 91 1151 09/19/02 LOT 80 24188-2 1229 8 113.0 16.2 11 96 1152 09/19/02 GREENE CIR., 24188-2 1232 11 117.2 12.1 8 97 CENTRAL LINE 1153 09/19/02 LOT 97 24188-2 1229 3 122.6 9.0 1 96 1154 09/19/02 LOT 98 24188.2 1231 5 121.9 8.9 1 95 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt ~l() I I Table NQ. A-1, J'ieldDenl!ity Tel!t Rel!ults . , . , -c . . Appro.. .Test App,~x.FIIl Dry Moist. Comp.. Teot Test Location Tract S~II Remarks No. Date No. Elev. I:JQlpw'Test Denslly Content Type aCtion (90% Req.u,'II~s: noted) (ft) (ft) (p<f) ('!o) ('!o) 1155 09/19/02 LOT 80 24188-2 1233 12 112.0 16.0 11 95 1156 09/19/02 LOT 80 24188-2 1237 16 110.6 14.6 11 94 1157 09/19/02 GREENE CIR. 24188.2 1234 13 109.6 13.6 8 91 1158 09/19/02 LOT 84 24188-2 1230 18 108.9 14.2 8 90 1159 09/19/02 LOT 82 24188-2 1232 14 115.8 9.3 1 91 1160 09/19/02 LOT 80 24188-2 1240 19 116.9 10.2 1 91 1161 09/19/02 LOT 96 24188.2 1230 6 122.6 9.2 1 96 1162 09/19/02 GREENE CIR. @ LOT 96 24188.2 1234 15 120.2 9.6 1 94 1163 09/20/02 LOT 96 24188-2 1227 2 119.4 10.2 1 93 '154 09/20/02 LOT 100 24188-2 1237 5 124.0 8.1 1 97 1165 09/20/02 LOT 98 24188-2 1230 4 108.9 12.6 8 90 1166 09/20/02 LOT 75 24188-2 1231 2 109.3 13.5 8 90 1167 09/20/02 LOT 96 24188-2 1230 5 117.2 9.3 1 92 1168 09/20/02 LOT 96 24188.2 1233 8 116.4 9.9 1 91 1169 09/20/02 LOT 99 24188-2 1235 2 121.6 8.8 1 95 1170 09/20/02 LOT 86 24188.2 1236 23 116.9 9.8 1 91 1171 09/20102 LOT 78 24188-2 1238 7 106.8 .16.2 11 91 1172 09/20/02 LOT 80 24188.2 1242 20 108.2 14.9 11 92 1173 09/20/02 LOT 67 24188-2 1248 14 106.0 14.9 11 90 1174 09/20/02 LOT 77 24188-2 1244 4 108.1 13.6 11 92 1175 09/20/02 LOT 78 24188-2 1240 9 116.0 10.6 1 91 1176 09/20/02 LOT 79 24188.2 1240 15 115.9 9.8 1 91 1177 09/12/02 LOT 20 24188 1261 30 120.0 11.9 1 94 1178 09/12/02 LOT 18 24188 1259 22 109.3 13.1 8 90 1179 09/17/02 LOT 16 24188 1258 24 111.7 14.4 8 92 1180 09/12/02 LOT 14 24188 1258 32 113.4 14.1 8 94 1181 09/12/02 LOT 12 24188 1257 8 110.7 14.3 8 91 1182 09/17/02 LOT 10 24188 1257 15 111.6 13.4 8 92 1183 09/18/02 LOT 31 24188-3 1261 FG 117.5 8.9 1 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 241BB March 6, 2003 Page 44 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\ 1999\81\99-112\99112-53.lr24188.fdl ~. I I ~ Table No. A4, Field Density Test Results ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ Approx.Test Appro.. fill pry Moist. Compo. Test Test 'L!)Catlon Tract Ere";. Below Test P""~Jty 'Content Soil ~ action Remarks No. Date 1':10; Ill) (ft) (p<:i) ('Yo) Typo ('Yo) :(9Q%'Req, ,\.Inlessnoted) 1184 09/18/02 LOT 32 24188.3 1261 FG 120.7 7.5 1 94 1185 09/18/02 LOT 33 24188.3 1261 FG 106.6 7.0 8 88 Failed * 1186 09/18/02 LOT 34 24188.3 1261 FG 113.0 11.7 8 93 1187 09/18/02 LOT 35 24188.3 1261 FG 107.2 6.5 8 89 Failed * 1188 09/18/02 LOT 36 24188.3 1261 FG 118.5 9.7 1 93 1189 09/18/02 LOT 90 24188~3 1290 5 91.7 32.9 11 78 Failed, See RT 1/ 1289 1190 09/18/02 LOT 88 24188.3 1295 2 110.6 8.0 8 91 1191 09/19/02 LOT 58 24188 1257 5 109.0 7.3 8 90 1192 09/19/02 LOT 59 24188 1257 8 112.9 7.5 8 93 1193 09/19/02 LOT 60 24188 1260 18 111.4 11.9 8 92 1194 09/19/02 LOT 61 24188 1258 28 115.2 9.7 8 95 1195 09/19/02 LOT 62 24188 1259 37 118.4 11.5 8 98 1196 09/19/02 LOT 63 24188 1259 9 118.8 9.5 8 98 1197 09/20/02 LOT 78 24188~2 1243 12 108.8 8.3 8 90 1198 09/20/02 LOT 79 24188.2 1243 18 111.7 19.3 8 92 1199 09/20/02 GREENE CIR. @ LOT 79 24188-2 1238 17 105.6 18.3 2 92 1200 09/20/02 LOT 75 24188.2 1245 21 108.3 12.5 8 90 1201 09/20/02 LOT 76 24188-2 1247 4 110.5 13.7 8 91 1202 09/20/02 LOT 77 24188.2 1245 5 110.3 12.8 8 91 1203 09/20/02 GREENE CIR. @ LOT 75 24188.2 1240 19 114.2 9.0 8 94 1204 09/20/02 LOT 86 24188-3 1306 FG 113.8 7.0 8 94 1205 09/20/02 LOT 85 24188.3 1305 FG 112.8 6.1 8 93 1206 09/10/02 LOT 49 24188-3 1281 3 102.3 22.4 2 90 1207 09/10/02 LOT 49 24188-3 1282 4 103.9 20.0 2 91 1208 09/10/02 LOT 46 24188.3 1275 7 118.4 9.0 1 93 1209 09/10/02 LOT 46 24188-3 1276 8 117.9 9.2 1 92 ~ Te$ts No. 1210 and 12.1' 1 were not used 1212 09/13/02 LOT 22 24188 1259 19 116.5 11.8 1 91 1214 09/13/02 LOT 24 24188 1257 17 119.8 11.6 1 94 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 45 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt 10 II I I , Table No. A-1, Field.Oerlsity Test~esults Test '-Test location T~ct Appro)L T~t Appro.. Fill pry MOist. SOil ComP'" Remarks Elev~ Below Test Den!>lty Content aetlon Noi D,ate- No; Type (90% Req. unless notod) .'. (It) ,(It) (~ (%) (%) 1215 09/13/02 LOT 25 24188 1259 24 122.5 8.2 1 96 1216 09/23/02 LOT 77 24188.2 1245 8 117.0 10.6 1 91 1217 9/23002 LOT 78 24188-2 1247 16 113.5 11.7 8 94 1218 09/23/02 LOT 79 24188-2 1249 24 109.8 13.0 8 91 1219 09/23/02 LOT 80 24188-2 1249 30 113.3 11.0 8 94 1220 09/23/02 LOT 83 24188.2 1245 25 116.2 9.6 1 91 1221 09/23/02 LOT 82 24188-2 1247 29 118.8 8.8 1 93 . TtfstNd.1222 was not used 1223 09/23/02 LOT 64 24188-3 1289 FG 123.7 6.0 1 97 1224 09/23/02 LOT 63 24188.3 1285 FG 131.0 6.7 1 102 1225 09/23/02 LOT 62 24188.3 1282 FG 124.6 7.5 1 97 1226 09/23/02 LOT 61 24188-3 1278 FG 118.4 6.3 1 93 1227 09/23/02 LOT 60 24188-3 1275 FG 111.7 7.2 1 87 Failed * 1228 09/23/02 LOT 59 24188.3 1271 FG 121.7 6.1 1 95 1229 09/23/02 LOT 58 24188-3 1271 FG 105.7 5.8 8 87 Failed * 1230 09/23/02 LOT 57 24188-3 1273 FG 110.8 4.2 8 92 1231 09/23/02 LOT 56 24188-3 1275 FG 121.9 5.1 1 95 1232 09/23/02 LOT 3, SOUTH OF 24188.3 1255 FG 118.5 9.1 1 93 SLOPE 1233 09/23/02 LOT 6, SOUTH OF 24188-3 1255 FG 118.7 8.2 1 93 SLOPE 1234 09/23/02 LOT 32, SOUTH OF 24188-3 1250 FG 119.5 9.7 1 94 SLOPE 1235 09/23/02 LOT 76 24188.2 1250 5 112.2 16.2 11 95 1236 09/23/02 LOT 77 24188.2 1250 10 110.6 15.8 11 94 1237 09/23/02 LOT 78 24188.2 1251 20 114.6 12.6 8 95 1238 09/23/02 LOTS 102& 103, 24188-2 1241 2 121.8 7.8 1 95 KEYWAY 1239 09/23/02 LOTS 110 & 111, 24188-2 1240 2 122.2 8.2 1 96 KEYWAY 1240 09/23/02 LOTS 115& 116, 24188-2 1241 2 115.2 12.2 8 95 KEYWAY 1241 09/24/02 LOT 80 24188.3 1286 FG 106.5 8.5 8 88 Failed, See RT # 1241 A 1241A 09/24/02 LOT 80 24188.3 1286 FG 109.5 7.9 8 91 RTof#1241 1242 09/24/02 LOT 77 24188-3 1275 FG 115.0 10.2 8 95 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENl\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdI "'\\ II I I T;lble No. A-t, Field Density Test Results . . Apprp.. FUI Dry MpI$\. Cpmp- TQ$t ,Tf:)St Locat,lon ;Tract Apprp..Test Spll Remarks Elev. Below'1es1 Densl,ty Content action No. Date No. (It) (It 1 (Pel) (o/.) Type (0/.1 (900/. Re<l. unles. hPted) . 1243 09/24/02 LOT 76 24188.3 1271 FG 108.5 4.9 8 90 1244 09/24/02 LOT 111 24188-2 1255 8TM 118.4 7.3 1 93 1245 09/24/02 LOT 67 24188-2 1255 2 106.0 15.2 11 90 1246 09/24/02 LOT 68 24188.2 1254 2 112.7 9.0 8 93 1247 09/24/02 LOT 79 24188-3 1282 FG 114.2 11.4 8 94 1248 09/24/02 LOT 78 24188.3 1279 FG 113.5 7.6 8 94 1249 09/24/02 LOT 75 24188.3 1268 FG 118.6 9.1 1 93 1250 09/24/02 LOT 21 24188 1264 FG 117.5 7.6 1 92 1251 09/24/02 LOT 20 24188 1263 FG 115.3 8.9 1 90 1252 09/24/02 LOT 19 24188 1262 FG 117.4 11.5 1 92 1253 09/24/02 LOT 18 24188 1261 FG 117.3 9.5 1 92 1254 09/24/02 LOT 17 24188 1261 FG 112.4 11.3 8 93 1255 09/24/02 LOT 67 24188.2 1253 19 112.5 11.9 8 93 1256 09/24/02 LOT 70 24188-2 1256 7 113.4 11.7 8 94 1257 09/24/02 LOT 61 24188.2 1257 2 116.5 7.3 1 91 1258 09/24/02 LOT 63 24188.2 1258 3 117.6 9.2 1 92 1259 09/24/02 LOT 67 24188-2 1255 21 113.6 10.5 8 94 1260 09/24/02 LOT 68 24188.2 1256 10 112.4 11.8 8 93 1261 09/24/02 LOTS 115 & 116. KEYWAY 24188-2 1242 2 119.2 8.2 1 93 1262 09/24/02 OTS 111 & 112, KEYWA 24188.2 1243 3 122.1 8.6 1 95 1263 09/24/02 LOTS 104&105. KEYWAY 24188.2 1244 5 121.2 9.0 1 95 1264 09/24/02 LOT 62 24188-2 1259 4 118.2 9.2 1 92 1265 09/25/02 LOT 67 24188.2 1257 23 110.9 11.3 8 92 1266 09/25/02 LOT 69 24188.2 1256 7 111.2 10.9 8 92 1267 09/25/02 LOT 72 24188-2 1256 2 110.6 12.0 8 91 1268 09/25/02 LOT 108 24188-2 1257 2 120.2 7.9 1 94 1269 09/25/02 LOT 110 24188-2 1257 2 119.6 8.9 1 93 1270 09/25/02 lOT 67 24188.2 1260 25 112.6 10.5 8 93 1271 09/25/02 LOT 70 24188.2 1257 8 113.6 11.2 8 94 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6. 2003 Page 47 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consuitants CCIENl\OFFICE\JOBFllE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt '1.~ I I Table NO. A4, Fiel~Density Test Re$ults . .. . ApprC))(. Test Af'prox; Fill . Test Test Location Tract PlY Moist. Soil CC)mp- Remarks No. 'Date Elev. Below Test Density Content Type actIon (90% Req. unless noted) No. (It) (It) (l>Of) (%) (%) . 1272 09/25/02 LOT 73 24188.2 1255 2 110.9 10.6 8 92 1273 09/25/02 LOT 71 24188-2 1256 2 112.0 10.2 8 93 1274 09/25/02 LOT 67 24188-2 1262 27 111.3 11.2 8 92 1275 09/25/02 LOT 107 24188.2 1252 13 119.6 9.4 1 93 1276 09/25/02 LOT 107 24188.2 1254 15 120.5 10.4 1 94 1277 09/25/02 LOT 110 24188-2 1256 16 117.6 9.8 1 92 1278 09/25/02 LOT 110 24188-2 1258 18 116.7 9.6 1 91 1279 09/25/02 LOT 104 24188-2 1251 13 125.3 9.9 1 98 1280 09/25/02 LOT 103 24188-2 1253 16 121.0 8.4 1 95 1281 09/25/02 LOT 16 24188 1261 FG 106.1 10.7 11 90 1282 09/25/02 LOT 14 24188 1260 FG 120.5 11.0 1 94 1283 09/25/02 LOT 12 24188 1259 FG 115.0 10.3 8 95 1284 09/25/02 LOT 10 24188 1259 FG 115.6 6.3 1 90 1285 09/25/02 LOT 4 24188 1257 FG 119.8 5.7 1 94 1286 09/25/02 LOT 3 24188 1256 FG 113.1 4.5 8 94 1287 09/25/02 LOT 2 24188 1256 FG 116.9 3.3 1 91 1288 09/25/02 lOT 1 24188 1255 FG 119.5 8.0 1 93 1289 09/25/02 LOT 90 24188-3 1293 5 114.0 8.0 3 94 RT of #1189 1290 09/25/02 LOT 83 24188-3 1300 FG 111.4 6.7 8 92 1291 09/25/02 LOT 82 24188-3 1298 FG 110.7 8.7 8 91 1292 09/25/02 LOT 54 24188-3 1279 FG 109.2 7.2 1 85 Failed, See RT #1292A 1292A 10/03/02 LOT 54 24188.3 1279 FG 113.3 8.2 8 94 RT of #1292 1293 09/25/02 LOT 6 24188 1258 FG 120.1 5.7 1 94 1294 09/25/02 LOT 5 24188 1257 FG 110.0 3.4 8 90 '295 09/25/02 LOT 89 24188.3 1297 8 111.2 11.2 8 92 1296 09/25/02 LOT 84 24188.3 1303 FG 110.9 9.2 8 92 1297 09/25/02 LOT 81 24188.3 1295 FG 108.4 7.9 8 90 1298 09/25/02 LOT 55 24188-3 1277 FG 103.4 6.9 8 85 Failed, See RT #1298A 1298A 10/03/02 LOT 55 24188.3 1277 FG 108.7 11.2 8 90 RT of #1298 Field Densrty Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 48 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ConverseConsuttanls CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\l 999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt ""\~ I I . Tallie No. A-1, Field Density Test Results , , , App'o~. Test App'o~.FIII Dry Moist. Comp- Test Test Location Tract SOli Remarks "0. ,Date, No. Elev. BeloW'Test Density ; Content Type actipo (90% Req. unless noted) (It) (It) (pel) (%) ('!o) 1299 09/25/02 LOT 15 24188 1260 FG 116.2 10.8 8 96 1300 09/25/02 LOT 13 24188 1260 FG 115.8 11.2 8 96 1301 09/25/02 LOT 11 24188 1260 FG 115.1 9.5 8 95 1302 09/25/02 LOT 9 24188 1259 FG 108.3 8.5 8 90 1303 09/25/02 LOT 8 24188 1258 FG 120.5 7.1 1 94 Cut Pads 1304 09/25/02 LOT 7 24188 1258 FG 120.9 7.1 1 94 Cut Pads 1305 09/26/02 LOT 71 24188.2 1257 4 108.4 14.9 8 90 1306 09/26/02 LOT 72 24188-2 1256 4 117.0 5.3 1 91 1307 09/26/02 LOT 73 24188.2 1256 4 114.2 10.2 8 94 1308 09/26/02 LOT 74 24188-2 1256 11 113.3 9.2 8 94 1309 09/26/02 LOT 105 24188-2 1255 4 113.8 9.0 8 94 1310 09/26/02 LOT 102 24188.2 1252 2 111.4 9.5 8 92 1311 09/26/02 LOT 100 24188.2 1250 2 115.0 8.8 1 90 1312 09/26/02 LOT 70 24188-2 1258 4 109.2 15.5 8 90 1313 09/26/02 LOT 68 24188-2 1259 9 114.8 11.4 8 95 1314 09/26/02 LOT 69 24188.2 1260 4 113.0 13.1 8 93 1315 09/26/02 LOT 67 24188-2 1262 17 110.8 12.8 8 92 1316 09/26/02 LOT 104 24188-2 1256 4 110.7 15.9 8 92 1317 09/26/02 LOT 101 24188-2 1252 2 117.3 6.8 1 92 1318 09/26/02 LOT 101 24188.2 1245 4 115.6 6.8 1 90 1319 09/26/02 LOT 99 24188-2 1240 8TM 120.7 7.4 1 94 1320 09/26/02 LOT 103 24188.2 1254 4 120.0 5.3 1 94 1321 09/26/02 LOT 102 24188-2 1251 8TM 102.2 19.5 2 89 Failed, See RT #1321A 1321A 09/27102 LOT 102 24188-2 1251 8TM 116.0 9.4 1 91 RTof#1321 1322 09/26/02 LOT 91 24188.2 1232 FG 125.1 11.2 1 98 1323 09/26/02 LOT 92 24188.2 1232 FG 108.6 13.0 8 90 1324 09/26/02 LOT 92, EAST SLOPE 24188.2 1222 FG 113.5 8.3 8 94 1325 09/26/02 LOT 91, EAST SLOPE 24188.2 1210 FG 109.3 7.8 8 90 1326 09/26/02 LOT 92, SOUTH SLOPE 24188-2 1210 FG 104.9 13.6 8 87 Failed, see retest # 1327 Field Density Tables Newland Homes 'Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 49 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ConverseConsuttants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt Il\ II I I .. . Table No. A-t, Field bensity Test Results Test Test Location 'Tract Approx. Test Approx, FIll pry Moist. Soil Cornp.. Remarks No. " Date- .. N'o. Elev. Below Test . pon.11y Content Type action (90% Req. unless noted) . . (fJ) (fJ) (pet) (0/.) (%) 1327 09/26/02 LOT 92, SOUTH SLOPE 24188-2 1205 FG 108.8 7.6 8 90 RT of #1326 1328 09/26/02 LOT 90 24188-2 1233 FG 110.9 8.2 8 92 1329 09/26/02 LOT 66 24188.2 1259 BTM 108.5 16.6 11 92 1330 09/26/02 LOT 64 24188-2 1260 1 106.3 17.3 11 90 1331 09/27/02 LOT 98 24188-2 1235 10 112.7 11.1 8 93 1332 09/27/02 LOT 98 24188.2 1232 8 115.7 10.5 8 96 1333 09/27/02 LOT 97 24188-2 1232 7 105.7 9.9 8 87 Failed, See RT #1333A 1333A 09/27/02 LOT 97 24188-2 1232 7 109.8 13.4 8 91 RT of #1333 1334 09/27/02 LOT 99 24188.2 1239 6 110.5 8.1 1 86 Failed, See RT #1334A 1334A 09/27/02 LOT 99 24188-2 1239 6 109.7 15.1 ' 8 91 RT of #1334 1335 09/27/02 LOT 100 24188.2 1242 10 113.8 9.6 8 94 1336 09/27/02 LOT 103 24188-2 1256 6 109.8 12.4 8 91 1337 09/27/02 LOT 104 24188.2 1257 5 111.2 13.1 8 92 1338 09/27/02 LOT 102 24188.2 1253 4 115.0 14.4 8 95 1339 09/27/02 LOT 99 24188-2 1241 8 115.5 12.9 8 95 1340 09/27/02 LOT 96 24188-2 1237 13 112.3 11.3 8 93 1341 09/27/02 LOT 98 24188-2 1243 11 120.6 10.5 1 94 1342 09/27/02 LOT 100 24188-2 1244 14 118.6 11.0 1 93 1343 09/27/02 LOT 57 24188.2 1260 2 112.5 10.6 8 93 1344 09/27/02 LOT 59 24188-2 1261 2 111.2 14.2 8 92 1345 09/27/02 LOT 65 24188-2 1262 4 112.0 14.0 8 93 1346 09/27/02 LOT 99 24188-2 1248 16 111.4 11.1 8 92 1347 09127/02 LOT 100 24188-2 1253 8 107.7 11.9 8 89 Failed, See RT #1347A 1347A 09/27/02 LOT 100 24188.2 1253 8 116.4 8.6 1 91 RT of #1347 1348 09/27/02 LOT 1 24188 1255 FG 114.2 8.0 8 94 Cut Pads 1349 09/27/02 LOT 2 24188 1256 FG 123.9 3.3 1 97 Cut Pads 1350 09/27/02 LOT 3 24188 1256 FG 123.4 4.5 1 96 Cut Pads 1351 09/27/02 LOT4 24188 1257 FG 121.2 5.7 1 95 Cut Pads 1352 09127/02 LOT 5 24188 1257 FG 115.2 3.4 1 90 Cut Pads Field DensilyTables Newland Homes Traet2418B March 6, 2003 Page 50 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ConverseConsultanls CCIENTiOFFICE\JOBFILE\ 1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188,fdt 15" I"' I I . table No. A.1.FieldDensity Test Results . . Appro~. TOOt APprox,FIII Dry Moist. Camp- TOOt Test Location Ti'a~ Elev; Below Test Density Content Soli action Remarks No'. Date No. (ft) (It) (l>Cf) '(%) Type (%) (90% Req; ui"iles,snoted) 1353 09/27/02 LOT 6 24188 1258 FG 119.7 5.7 1 94 Cut Pads 1354 09/27/02 LOT 7 24188 1258 FG 120.5 7.1 1 94 Cut Pads 1355 09/27/02 LOT 71 24188-3 1275 1 109.8 11.1 8 91 1356 09/27/02 LOT 72 24188.3 1270 BTM 112.1 10.4 8 93 1357 09/27/02 LOT 71 24188.3 1277 3 109.5 8.8 8 91 1358 09/27/02 LOT 72 24188-3 1272 2 108.7 10.8 8 90 1359 09/27/02 LOT 22 24188-2 1262 BTM 109.8 20.4 8 91 1360 09/30/02 LOT 8 24188 1257 FG 120.2 7.1 1 94 1361 09/30/02 LOT 53 24188.3 1281 FG 112.8 7.2 8 93 1362 09/30/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1283 FG 107.8 6.0 8 89 Failed, See AT #1362A 1362A 10/03/02 LOT 52 24188.3 1283 FG 11 1.7 10.4 8 92 AT of #1362 1363 09/30/02 LOT 5.1 24188-3 12B3 FG 10B.9 10.1 B 90 1364 09/30/02 LOT 50 24188.3 1283 FG 109.1 9.1 8 90 1365 09/30/02 LOT 99 24188.2 1250 18 109.4 10.0 8 90 1366 09/30/02 LOT 100 24188-2 1252 16 109.1 9.8 8 90 1367 09/30/02 LOT 101 24188.2 1250 6 111.6 10.1 B 92 136B 09/30/02 LOT 99 24188.2 1252 20 109.4 11.5 8 90 1369 09/30/02 LOT 101 24188-2 1253 18 107.0 14.8 11 91 1370 09/30/02 LOT 99 24188.2 1254 22 105.1 15.0 2 92 1371 09/30/02 LOT 36 24188.2 1258 BTM 103.3 14.0 8 85 Failed, See RT #1371A 1371A 09130/02 LOT 36 24188-2 1258 BTM 110.7 12.1 8 92 RT of #1371 1372 09/30/02 LOT 38 24188.2 1256 BTM 109.2 12.8 8 90 1373 09/30/02 LOT 101 24188-2 1256 12 115.5 6.9 1 90 1374 09/30/02 LOT 102 24188.2 1257 6 113.6 7.5 8 94 1375 09/30/02 LOT 12 24188.3 1274 35 112.6 15.2 B 93 1376 09/30/02 LOT 14 24188-3 1275 2 110.B 16.2 8 92 1377 09/30/02 LOT 13 24188-3 1276 12 112.4 14.6 8 93 1378 09/30/02 LOT 15 24188-3 1277 4 111.6 16.0 8 92 1379 10/01/02 LOTS 33 & 47, SLOPE 24188 1259 2 111.6 14.0 8 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 51 I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr2418S.fdt ,(p I II I . . . Table No.A-1., . Fieldbensity Test ResUlts . . ,Appro~Test Appro.. Fill pry 'MOist. Comp- Test T(tSt Location Tract SOil Remarks No. I, D1!rtQ No. elev. Below Test Densi1:Y Content Type action (90%Req. unless noted) ., (ft) (ft) (pcf) (0/0) ('!o) 1380 10/01/02 LOTS 36 & 44, SLOPE 24188 1257 2 112.2 14.5 .8 93 1381 10/01102 LOTS 37 & 43, SLOPE 24188 1259 9 112.1 14.1 8 93 1382 10/01/02 LOTS 32 & 47, SLOPE 24188 1261 4 110.3 14.6 8 91 1383 10/01/02 LOTS 35 & 45, SLOPE 24188 1260 5 110.6 13.2 8 91 1384 10101/02 LOTS 38 & 43, SLOPE 24188 1261 11 118.8 13.9 1 93 1385 10/01102 LOTS 33 & 47, SLOPE 24188 1264 6 118.6 12.6 1 93 1386 10/01/02 LOTS 36 & 44,SLOPE 24188 1262 7 111.6 13.7 8 92 1387 10/01102 LOTS 37 & 43, SLOPE 24188 1264 13 109.6 13.5 8 91 1388 10/01/02 LOTS 32 & 47, SLOPE 24188 1268 10 108.9 12.9 8 90 1389 10/01/02 LOTS 35 & 45, SLOPE 24188 1265 10 110.1 14.6 8 91 1390 10/01/02 LOTS 38 & 42, SLOPE 24188 1265 15 109.9 14.0 8 91 1391 10/01/02 LOT 49 24188.3 1283 FG 111.4 9.6 8 92 1392 10101/02 LOT 48 24188-3 1281 FG 122.8 8.3 1 96 1393 10/01/02 LOT 47 24188-3 1279 FG 121.5 11.4 1 96 1394 10/01/02 LOT 93, SLOPE 24188.2 1222 FG 111.1 9.1 8 92 1395 10/01102 LOT 92, WEST SLOPE 24188-2 1224 FG 107.2 12.1 8 89 Failed * 1396 10/01/02 LOT 88, SLOPE 24188-2 1225 FG 110.1 lOA 8 91 1397 10/01/02 LOT 87, SLOPE 24188-2 1226 FG 112.4 9.5 8 93 1398 10/01/02 lOT 89, SLOPE 24188-2 1224 FG 115.8 7.6 1 90 1399 10/01/02 LOT 85, SLOPE 24188-2 1231 FG 108.6 10.4 8 90 1400 10/01/02 lOT 84, SLOPE 24188.2 1225 FG 109.9 9.9 8 90 1401 10/01/02 LOT 82, SLOPE 24188-2 1240 FG 105.6 12.0 11 90 1402 10/01/02 LOT 79, SLOPE 24188-2 1240 FG 105.8 14.6 11 90 1403 10/01/02 LOT 48 24188-2 1261 8TM 124.6 8.6 1 97 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1404 10/01102 LOT 52 24188-2 1260 BTM 118.5 B.l 1 93 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1405 10/01/02 LOT 55 24188-2 1261 BTM 117.6 5.9 1 92 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1406 10/01/02 LOT 36 24188.2 1260 2 113.4 8.1 8 94 1407 10/01/02 LOT 36 24188.2 1261 3 10B.9 10.8 8 90 1408 10/01/02 lOT 37 24188.2 1260 2 111.6 13.2 8 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 52 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICEIJOBFllE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt 11 I I .. .. Table No. A4,. Field DellsityTest Results Test Test L,ocatlon Tract Appro~TeSt ApprQx. Fill Dry Moist. Soil Comp- Remarks No. Date No. Elev.: Below Test DensIty COntent Type actIon (90% Req. unless noted) . .. (ft) (ft) (pC{) (%) ('to) 1409 10101/02 LOT 38 24188.2 1259 2 118.3 6.5 1 92 1410 10101/02 LOT 40 24188.2 1251 BTM 118.8 6.8 1 93 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1411 10/01/02 LOT 36 24188.2 1262 4 104.7 15.3 11 89 Failed, See RT #1411A 1411A 10/01/02 LOT 36 24188.2 1262 4 106.8 15.3 11 91 RT of #1411 1412 10/01/02 LOT 37 24188-2 1262 4 112.0 13.4 8 93 1413 10101/02 LOT 38 24188.2 1261 4 110.5 15.3 8 91 1414 10/02/02 LOTS 34 & 36, SLOPE 24188 1264 7 109.3 12.1 8 90 1415 10102/02 LOT 42 24188 1262 12 10B.9 12.9 B 90 1416 10102/02 LOT 44 24188 1264 B 110.2 11.2 B 91 1417 10/02/02 LOT 46 24188 1265 B 109.0 11.0 8 90 1418 10102/02 LOT 47 24188 1266 8 107.8 15.8 11 91 1419 10102/02 LOT 42 24188 1262 12 106.5 16.5 11 90 1420 10102/02 LOT 44 24188 1266 7 108.0 16.0 11 92 1421 10102/02 LOT 46 24188 1266 9 107.6 14.6 11 91 1422 10/02/02 LOT 47 24188 126B 10 112.2 11.2 8 93 1423 10/02/02 LOT 46 24188 1268 11 113.2 12.2 8 94 1424 10/02/02 LOT 23 24188.2 1260 BTM 111.5 14.4 8 92 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1425 10/02/02 LOT 25 24188-2 1261 BTM 112.7 9.6 8 93 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1426 10/02/02 LOT 22 24188.2 1259 2 109.7 15.3 B 91 1427 10/02/02 LOT 24 24188-2 1262 2 110.3 11.1 8 91 1428 10/02/02 LOT 26 24188-2 1262 2 109.3 16.8 8 90 1429 10/02/02 LOT 24 24188.2 1263 3 110.2 15.0 8 91 1430 10102/02 LOT 42 24188.2 1252 2 112.8 12.9 8 93 1431 10/02/02 LOT 41 24188-2 1253 2 110.9 13.5 8 92 1432 10/02/02 LOT 39 24188-2 1249 BTM 110.6 13.2 8 91 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1433 10/02/02 LOT 40 24188-2 1251 2 108.7 12.9 B 90 1434 10/02/02 LOT 39 24188-2 1251 2 115.2 10.0 1 90 1435 10/02/02 LOT 41 24188-2 1254 4 114.9 7.8 1 90 1436 10102/02 LOT 46 24188-3 1277 FG 114.7 8.1 8 95 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract24188 March 6, 2003 Page 53 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFICEIJOBFllE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt 1~ I I , " ' Tab!eNo. A-1., Field Density TeslResults 7. .' " , Approx.T~ AppfQ..FIII Test ;Test Location Tract On' Ml)ist 5l)i1 Camp.. Remarks No. . Date No. EleY; B~low 'Test Density Cllhtent Type action ,{90%Req. unless noted) , (ft) (ft) (P<fl ('!o) .('!o) 1437 10/02/02 LOT 45 24188-3 1275 FG 109.5 9.3 8 90 1438 10/02/02 LOT B7 24188-3 1305 FG 101.1 5.6 8 84 Failed, See RT #1438A 1438A 10/02/02 LOT 87 24188-3 1305 FG 109.8 5.6 8 91 RT of #1438 1439 10/02/02 LOT 88 24188.3 1302 FG 116.6 8.1 8 96 1440 10/02/02 LOT 89 24188.3 1299 FG 110.6 4.9 8 91 1441 10/02/02 LOT 90 24188-3 1295 FG 115.2 8.9 8 95 1442 10/02/02 LOT 91 24188-3 1295 FG 111.8 5.7 8 92 1443 10/02/02 LOT 92 24188-3 1295 FG 113.7 9.8 8 94 1444 10/02/02 LOT 93 24188-3 1294 FG 110.6 6.8 8 91 1445 10/02/02 LOT 94 24188-3 1293 FG 113.4 11.2 8 93 1446 10/03/02 LOT 72 24188.3 1271 8TM 107.6 10.8 11 92 Native Bottom, 85% Req. 1447 10103/02 LOT 72 24188.3 1273 1 111.6 10.8 8 92 1448 10/03/02 LOT 93 24188-2 1232 FG 122.2 4.0 1 96 1449 10/03/02 LOT 94 24188-2 1234 FG 109.9 7.1 8 91 1450 10/03/02 LOT 40 24188.2 1235 FG 113.6 6.7 8 94 1451 10/03/02 LOT 52 24188 1272 FG 112.9 5.9 8 93 1452 10/03/02 LOT 53 24188 1269 FG 116.8 4.3 8 97 1453 10/03/02 LOT 42 24188-3 1264 14 116.9 12.9 1.0 91 1454 10/03/02 LOT 44 24188 1267 2 115.9 10.9 1.0 91 1455 10/03/02 LOT 47 24188 1270 8TM 112.6 13.5 8.0 93 Native B~ttom, 85% Req. 1456 10/03/02 LOT 42 24188.3 1266 16 113.3 12.4 8.0 94 ' 1457 10/03/02 LOT 44 24188 1269 1 116.2 8.2 1.0 91 1458 10/03/02 LOT 47 24188 1272 2 117.3 9.2 1.0 92 1459 10/03/02 LOT 43 24188 1266 2 114.7 12.1 8.0 95 1460 10/03/02 LOT 45 24188.3 1269 3 113.5 13.1 8.0 94 1461 10/03/02 LOT 48 24188 1273 2 111.6 13.5 8.0 92 1462 10/03/02 LOT 45 24188-3 1271 1 112.2 12.6 8.0 93 1463 , 0/03/02 LOT 40 24188-2 1253 4 114.6 13.4 8 95 1464 10/03/02 LOT 41 24188-2 1256 6 111.7 9.9 8 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 54 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.1r24188.fdt 1'\ I I , ' Table No. A-1, . Field Density Test Results . . Test Location Appro.. Test Appro~. FlU PlY Moist. Com~ , Tost Tract Elev. Below'Test' Qeo$lty COntent Soli action Remarks No. Date No. (It) (It) (pet) ,(Vo) Type ('l'ol (90:0/. Req. unless noted) . . , 1465 10/03/02 LOT 39 24188-2 1252 4 111.4 13.5 8 92 1466 10/03/02 LOT 42 24188-2 1254 4 116.8 11.7 1 91 1467 10/03/02 LOT 39 24188.2 1254 5 110.1 10.1 8 91 1468 10/03/02 LOT 38 24188-2 1263 6 111.7 11.1 8 92 1469 10/03/02 LOT 43 24188.2 1259 2 106.0 12.0 8 88 Failed, See RT # 1469A 1469A 10/03/02 LOT 43 24188-2 1259 2 112.4 8.1 8 93 RT of #1469 1470 10/03/02 LOT 37 24188.2 1263 6 109.4 6.8 8 89 1471 10/03/02 LOT 47 24188-2 1261 2 115.2 7.9 1 90 1472 10/03/02 LOT 47 24188.2 1263 4 117.5 6.3 1 92 1473 10/04/02 LOT 43 24188 1268 5 109.5 12.4 8 91 1474 10/04/02 LOT 46 24188 1274 5 108.3 13.3 8 90 1475 10/04/02 LOT 48 24188 1275 5 109.9 12.7 8 91 1476 10/04/02 LOT 71 24188.3 1278 4 108.2 16.0 11 92 1477 10/04/02 LOT 72 24188.3 1273 3 106.8 16.9 11 91 1478 10/04/02 lOT 72 24188-3 1275 5 107.7 14.9 11 91 1479 10/04/02 LOT 73 24188.3 1270 4 108.0 14.2 11 92 1480 10104/02 LOT 74 24186-3 1267 4 106.9 14.6 11 91 1481 10/04/02 LOT 54 24188 1267 FG 108.7 6.1 8 90 1482 10/04/02 LOT 4 24186.2 1252 2 108.6 16.7 8 90 1483 10104/02 LOT5 24188.2 1251 1 112.9 12.9 8 93 1484 10/04/02 LOT 8 24188.2 1253 3 113.1 13.8 8 94 1485 10/04/02 LOT 9 24188-2 1254 4 116.0 8.0 8 96 1486 10/04/02 LOT 6 24188-2 1253 3 108.7 19.4 8 90 1487 10/04/02 LOT 8 24188-2 1256 1 112.7 12.9 8 93 1488 10/04/02 LOT 9 24188-2 1256 2 117.5 10.9 8 97 1489 10/04/02 LOT 7 24188-2 1254 4 109.9 14.9 8 91 1490 10/07/02 LOT 28 24188-3 1259 3 121.0 10.8 1 95 1491 10107/02 LOT 26 24188.3 1267 2 117.6 12.5 1 92 1492 10/07/02 . LOT 24 24188.3 1271 2 110.2 13.3 8 91 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 55 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ConverseConsultanls CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFtLE\1999\81199.112\99112.53.tr24188.fdt ttP I I . Table No. A-1, ~iejd Density Test Results . Approx. TO$! Approx.FIII Pry Moist. Comp-. -. Test Test ~oc:atl(m Tract Soli . RemarkS No. Date Elev. Below'Test DerlS!Jy Content Type action (90%Req. unleSs noted) No. (ft) (ft) (1%1) (%) ('/0) 1493 10/07/02 LOT 27 24188-3 1264 4 110.7 13.3 8 92 1494 10/07/02 LOT 25 24188.3 1270 4 116.1 11.0 1 91 1495 10/07/02 LOT 28 24188-3 1261 5 116.2 10.0 1 91 1496 10/07102 LOT 26 24188-2 1264 4 108.3 14.2 8 90 1497 10/07/02 LOT 25 24188.2 1263 4 109.9 10.8 8 91 1498 10/07/02 LOT 23 24188.2 1264 4 106.2 16.5 11 90 1499 10/07/02 LOT 24 24188-2 1264 4 116.0 7.3 1 91 1500 10/07/02 LOT 21 24188-2 1259 2 114.4 13.9 8 95 1501 10/07/02 LOT 22 24188.2 1260 2 113.6 14.1 8 94 1502 10/07/02 LOT 22 24188.2 1262 4 111.6 13.5 8 92 1503 10/07/02 LOT 21 24188-2 1261 4 114.9 10.7 8 95 1504 10/07/02 LOT 26 24188-2 1263 6 111.7 17.6 8 92 1505 10/07/02 LOT 89 24188-2 1234 FG 108.4 11.3 8 90 1506 10/07/02 LOT 88 24188-2 1235 FG 112.5 10.8 8 93 1507 10/07102 LOT 87 24188.2 1237 FG 115.9 9.4 8 96 1508 10/07/02 LOT 83 24188-2 1246 FG 124.0 8.4 1 97 1509 10/07102 LOT 84 24188.2 1244 FG 108.9 6.2 8 90 1510 10/07102 LOT 82 24188.2 1249 FG 110.1 10.2 8 91 1511 10/08/02 LOT 86 24188.2 1239 FG 117.1 10.0 1 92 1512 10/08/02 LOT 85 24188-2 1241 FG 113.0 11.5 8 93 1513 10/08/02 LOT 23 24188.2 1264 10 120.1 7.2 1 94 1514 10/08/02 LOT 25 24188-2 1264 9 119.7 8.1 1 94 1515 10/08/02 LOT 26 24188-2 1266 10 120.1 7.9 1 94 1516 10/08/02 LOT 24 24188.2 1265 10 119.2 7.4 1 93 1517 10/08/02 LOT 1 24188-2 1250 2 120.2 8.8 1 94 1518 10/08/02 LOT 3 24188-2 1252 3 118.2 9.7 1 92 1519 10/09/02 LOT 2 24188.2 1251 2 118.9 8.5 1 93 1520 10109/02 LOT 2 24188-2 1253 5 116.7 9.2 1 91 1521 10/09/02 LOT 86. SLOPE 24188.3 1298 8 111.3 7.6 8 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 56 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENnOFFICE\JOBFILE\l 999\81\99-112\99112-53.1r24188.fdt ~\ II I I Table NQ. A,1, Field Density Test Results Test Test Location Tract ApP'Q~. TIl$!, ApprQ~.Fm PrY MQlot. SCllI Camp- Remarks Elev, Below Test De"~:lty Content Type action (9O%~eq. :.hl.... nQled) '1\10. Date NQ. (ft) (ft) (pel) (%) (%) . . . '. . 1522 10/09/02 LOT 84, SLOPE 24188.3 1298 5 109.8 8.6 8 91 1523 10/09/02 LOT 82, SLOPE 24188-3 1290 8 113.7 7.8 8 94 1524 10/09/02 LOT 78, SLOPE 24188-3 1270 9 109.7 9.0 8 91 1525 10/09/02 LOT 75, SLOPE 24188-3 1260 8 110.2 8.6 8 91 1526 10/09/02 LOT 19, SLOPE 24188 1254 8 116.0 8.5 1 91 1527 10/09/02 LOT 16, SLOPE 24188 1252 8 110.2 7.6 8 91 1528 10/09/02 LOT 12, SLOPE 24188 1251 8 114.9 7.7 1 90 1529 10/09/02 LOT 78 24188.2 1253 FG 109.2 6.3 8 90 1530 10/09/02 LOT 77 24188-2 1252 FG 109.7 10.2 8 91 1531 10109/02 LOT 76 24188-2 1251 FG 117.2 6.3 8 97 1532 10/09/02 LOT 75 24188-2 1251 FG 115.4 9.7 8 95 1533 10/09/02 LOT 79 24188-2 1252 FG 114.9 11.0 8 95 1534 10/09/02 LOT 80 24188-2 1251 FG 117.1 7.4 1 92 1535 10/09/02 LOT 81 24188-2 1251 FG 120.1 4.8 1 94 1536 10/09/02 LOT 118 24188.2 1255 FG 117.8 8.3 1 92 1537 10/09/02 LOT 117 24188-2 1256 FG 114.6 8.0 1 90 1538 10/09/02 lOT 116 24188-2 1258 FG 117.9 7.5 1 92 1539 10/09/02 LOT 115 24188-2 1259 FG 114.8 10.1 1 90 1540 10/09/02 lOT 114 24188.2 1260 FG 120.9 10.5 1 95 1541 10/10/02 LOT 42 24188 1266 FG 111.2 14.2 8 92 1542 10/10/02 LOT 43 24188 1268 FG 112.3 10.6 .8 93 1543 10/10/02 LOT 44 24188 1271 FG 113.2 10.3 8 94 1544 10/10/02 LOT 45 24188 1273 FG 113.7 10.1 8 94 1545 10/10102 LOT 46 24188 1275 FG 114.2 11.0 8 94 1546 10/10/02 LOT 47 24188 1275 FG 114.1 11.7 8 94 1547 10110/02 LOT 48 24188 1275 FG 116.1 8.3 8 96 1548 10110/02 LOT 49 24188 1275 FG 115.8 9.8 8 96 1549 10110/02 LOT 50 24188 1275 FG 115.1 9.4 8 95 1550 10/10/02 LOT 51 24188 1274 FG 115.9 8.3 8 96 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 57 I I I I I I I II I ,I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFF1CE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112~53.tr24188.fdt ~-z... I I . . Table No. A.1, Fie!d Del)sityTest Resu.lts . Approx. Test App'oX.FIII Dry Molst. . Comp.. Test Test LoCation Tract Soil Remarks ,,-'No,. : Oat..' No. Elev; BelowTest Detl$lty Content Type action (90% ReCi. unless tioted) ,." (ft) (ft) (pel) (%) (%) 1551 10/10/02 LOT 55 24188 1265 FG 114.5 7.3 8 95 1552 10/10/02 LOT 56 24188 1262 FG 114.8 8.4 8 95 1553 10/10/02 LOT 57 24188 1260 FG 115.3 7.7 8 95 1554 10/10/02 LOT 111 24188.2 1261 FG 124.5 8.2 1 97 1555 10/10/02 LOT 109 24188-2 1261 FG 119.2 6.0 1 93 1556 10/10/02 LOT 107 24188.2 1260 FG 102.4 8.3 8 85 Failed, See RT #1556A 1556A 10/10/02 LOT 107 24188-2 1260 FG 110.2 8.0 8 91 RT of #1556 1557 10/10/02 LOT 74 24188-2 1258 FG 108.7 6.5 8 90 1558 10/10/02 LOT 73 24188.2 1256 . FG 111.3 7.7 8 92 1559 10/10/02 LOT 67 24188-2 1264 FG 111.3 13.1 8 92 1560 10/10/02 lOT 70 24188.2 1262 FG 109.2 9.7 8 90 1561 10/10/02 LOT 113 24188-2 1261 FG 127.0 8.5 1 99 1562 10/10/02 LOT 112 24188.2 1261 FG 118.7 8.8 1 93 1563 10/10102 LOT 110 24188-2 1261 FG 119.8 12.1 1 94 1564 10/10/02 LOT 108 24188-2 1260 FG 117.1 7.8 1 91 1565 10/10/02 LOT 106 24188-2 1259 FG 112.5 8.2 8 93 1566 10/10/02 LOT 71 24188-2 1259 FG 106.9 9.3 8 88 Failed, See RT #1566A 1566A 10/11/02 LOT 71 24188-2 1259 FG 110.5 5.5 8 91 AT of #1566 1567 10/10/02 LOT 72 24188-2 1259 FG 115.9 7.9 1 91 1568 10110/02 LOT 68 24188.2 1263 FG 93.3 17.5 11 79 Failed, See RT #1568A 1568A 10/11/02 LOT 68 24188-2 1263 FG 110.1 9.7 8 91 AT of #1568 1569 10/10/02 LOT 69 24188.2 1262 FG 108.7 12.6 8 90 1570 10/10/02 LOT 66 24188-2 1263 FG 113.9 8.9 8 94 1571 10/10/02 LOT 57 24188-2 1263 FG 110.9 9.3 8 92 1572 10/10/02 LOT 65 24188-2 1262 FG 112.9 10.1 8 93 1573 10/11/02 LOT 60 24188-2 1261 FG 114.9 6.5 1 90 1574 10/11/02 LOT 62 24188.2 1260 FG 111.4 10.5 8 92 1575 10/11/02 LOT 64 24188-2 1262 FG 115.5 9.5 1 90 1576 10/11/02 LOT 103 24188-2 1258 FG 117.1 8.6 1 92 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tracl24188 March 6, 2003 Page 58 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt eo I I Table.No.A-1, Field Density Test Results Test TeSt Location Tract ; Approx.TBSt !\pprQX. Fill Dry M<>Ist. Soli Com~ Remarks No. D.te. No. EleY. Below Test De"$lty Content Type action (90% Req. l!nless noted) . , (ft) (ft) (pC!) (%) (%) 1577 10/11/02 LOT 102 24188-2 1258 FG 113.6 8.0 8 94 1578 10/11/02 LOT 101 24188.2 1258 FG 116.6 8.7 1 91 1579 10/11/02 LOT 100 24188-2 1257 FG 122.2 9.8 1 96 1580 10/11/02 LOT 61 24188.2 1261 FG 117.9 8.0 1 92 1581 10/11/02 LOT 63 24188-2 1260 FG 110.3 7.5 8 91 1582 10/11/02 LOT 59 24188-2 1263 FG 121.1 6.6 1 95 1583 10/11/02 LOT 58 24188.2 1263 FG 107.2 7.2 8 89 Failed, See RT #1583A 1583A 10/11/02 LOT 58 24188.2 1263 FG 110.1 9.7 8 91 RT of #1583 1584 10/11/02 LOT 105 24188-2 1259 FG 115.3 7.6 1 90 1585 10/11/02 LOT 104 24188.2 1259 FG 109.5 7.8 8 90 1586 10/11/02 LOT 99 24188-2 1257 FG 118.2 8.7 1 92 1587 10/14/02 LOT 22 24188 1263 FG 109.1 9.9 3 90 1587A 10/14/02 LOT 22 24188 1263 FG 111.7 9.9 3 92 1588 10/14/02 LOT 23 24188 1262 FG 121.9 10.6 1 95 1589 10/14/02 lOT 24 24188 1262 FG 113.1 8.5 8 93 1590 10/14/02 LOT 25 24188 1261 FG 111.0 8.3 8 92 1591 10/14/02 LOT 26 24188 1261 FG 110.4 13.0 3 91 1592 10/14/02 LOT 27 24188 1260 FG 110.2 7.2 3 91 1593 10/14/02 LOT 28 24188 1260 FG 108.4 5.6 3 90 1593A 10/14/02 LOT 28 24188 1260 FG 111.8 5.6 3 92 1594 10/14/02 LOT 29 24188 1260 FG 111.9 10.0 8 93 1595 10/14/02 LOT 30 24188 1258 FG 110.6 8.7 8 91 1596 10/14/02 LOT 31 24188 1258 FG 118.9 6.9 1 93 1597 10/14/02 LOT 32 24188 1257 FG 120.8 8.3 1 94 1598 10/14/02 LOT 33 24188 1257 FG 121.8 7.5 1 95 1599 10/14/02 LOT 28, SLOPE 24188.2 1264 2 116.7 11.5 3 96 1600 10/14/02 LOT 28, SLOPE 24188.2 1266 4 108.3 11.5 3 90 1601 10/15/02 LOT 34 24188 1257 FG 113.4 7.1 3 94 1602 10/15/02 LOT 35 24188 1256 FG 109.0 11.8 3 90 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract24188 March 6, 2003 Page 59 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENliOFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt ~ I I ~ Table No. )1,"1. FIeld Density Test Resulls . . Approx. Test Approx. Fill Dry 'Moist Camp- TeSt TeSt Location .. Tract SOlI Remarks No. , .Date No. Etev. Below Test Density Content Type 'action (90%Req. unless noted) (ft) (ft) (pcf) (%) (%) . 1603 10/15/02 LOT 36 24188 1255 FG 110.6 15.1 8 91 1604 10/15/02 LOT 37 24188 1255 FG 112.3 16.9 8 93 1605 10/15/02 LOT 38 24188 1254 FG 106.9 10.2 11 91 1606 10/15/02 LOT 39 24188 1254 FG 112.3 8.0 3 93 1607 10/15/02 LOT 40 24188 1254 FG 107.1 8.3 11 91 1608 10/15/02 LOT 41 24188 1256 FG 108.0 7.9 11 92 1609 10/15/02 Lot 37 24188-3 1262 FG 106.0 12.6 11 90 1610 10/15/02 LOT 38 24188.3 1265 FG 119.6 6.8 1 93 1611 10/15/02 LOT 39 24188-3 1268 FG 111.4 10.5 3 92 1612 10/15/02 LOT 40 24188-3 1271 FG 113.8 6.7 3 94 1613 10/16/02 LOT 41 24188.3 1272 FG 109.9 11.1 3 91 1614 10/16/02 LOT 42 24188-3 1272 FG 109.9 12.2 3 91 1615 10/16/02 LOT 43 24188-3 1271 FG 109.0 11.0 3 90 1616 10/16/02 LOT 44 24188.3 1271 FG 108.8 9.9 3 90 1617 10/16/02 LOT 8 24188-3 1268 FG 112.7 9.0 3 93 1618 10/16/02 LOT 9 24188.3 1268 FG 118.3 10.0 3 98 1619 10/16/02 LOT 16 24188-2 1252 2 116.3 10.0 1 91 1620 10/16/02 LOT 17 24188-2 1252 2 112.7 8.3 3 93 1621 10/16/02 LOT 14 24188.2 1253 2 122.4 10.2 1 96 1622 10/16/02 LOT 18 24188-2 1253 3 116.5 10.5 1 91 1623 10/16/02 LOT 12 24188.2 1255 4 112.7 10.9 3 93 1624 10/16/02 LOT 20 24188-2 1256 4 115.5 9.2 1 90 1625 10/16/02 LOT 11, SLOPE 24188-2 1253 FG 110.9 14.3 8 92 1626 10/16/02 LOT 8, SLOPE 24188-2 1250 FG 102.6 16.2 2 90 1627 10/16/02 LOT 5, SLOPE 24188.2 1251 FG 121.7 7.9 1 95 1628 10/17/02 LOT 12 24188.3 1277 FG 109.1 10.5 8 90 1629 10/17/02 LOT 13 24188.3 1278 FG 116.4 12.8 1 91 1630 10/17/02 LOT 14 24188-3 1278 FG 107.3 11.0 8 89 Failed, See RT #1630A 1630A 10/28/02 lOT 14 24188-3 1278 FG 115.4 12.2 8 95 RT of #1630 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 60 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ConverseConsuttants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFIlE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188Jdt ~~ I I I. , , Table No. A.1, Field:Oensity1est Results , '. Approx. Test Approx.FlU pry Moist. CamP:' Test I-Test_ LocatlOn Tract Elev. Below TeiSt Density Content Soli action Remarks . ,No. Date No. Typo (90% Req.unless noted) . . . " (ft) 1ft) (p<;f) ($'o) ("to) 1631 10/17/02 LOT 15 24188-3 1279 FG 117.6 7.8 1 92 1632 10/17/02 LOT 71 24188.3 1279 FG 117.1 8.3 1 92 1633 10/17/02 LOT 74 24188-3 1268 FG 104.9 10.9 8 87 Failed, See RT 11 1633A 1633A 10117/02 lOT 74 24188-3 1268 FG 110.5 8.7 8 91 RT of #1633 1634 10/17/02 LOT 10 24188-3 1271 FG 111.2 9.5 3 92 1635 10117/02 LOT 11 24188.3 1273 FG 117.2 7.1 1 92 1636 10/17/02 LOT 16 24188-3 1278 FG 110.9 8.9 3 92 1637 10/17/02 LOT 17 24188-3 1278 FG 119.7 7.0 1 94 1638 10/17/02 LOT 18 24188.3 1278 FG 114.4 8.8 3 95 1639 10/17/02 LOT 19 24188-3 1277 FG 116.4 5.9 1 91 1640 10/17/02 LOT 72 24188-3 1275 FG 110.8 6.5 3 92 1641 10117/02 LOT 73 24188.3 1271 FG 113.6 10.9 3 94 1642 10/17/02 LOT 28, SLOPE 24188-2 1252 FG 111.2 11.6 3 92 1643 10117/02 LOT 27, SLOPE 24188-2 1258 FG 108.6 8.9 3 90 1644 10118/02 LOT 20 24188-3 1282 FG 110.5 8.9 3 91 1645 10/18/02 LOT 21 24188.3 1281 FG 116.1 7.4 1 91 1646 10/18/02 LOT 22 24188-3 1278 FG 107.1 11.6 11 91 1647 10/18/02 LOT 23 24188-3 1276 FG 104.5 8.7 3 86 Failed, See RT #1647A 1647A 10/28/02 lOT 23 24188-3 1276 FG 111.0 13.4 3 92 RT of #1647 1648 10/18/02 LOT 24 24188.3 1274 FG 118.2 7.0 1 92 1649 10118/02 LOT 25 24188.3 1272 FG 117.9 6.2 1 92 1650 10118/02 LOT 26 24188.3 1270 FG 113.6 10.1 3 94 1651 10/18/02 LOT 27 24188-3 1266 FG 111.8 9.5 3 92 1652 10118/02 LOT 28 24188-3 1262 FG 115.0 7.5 1 90 1653 10118/02 LOT 29 24188.3 1261 FG 116.2 11.7 1 91 1654 10118/02 LOT 30 24188-3 1261 FG 114.4 10.8 3 95 1655 10118/02 LOT 101, SLOPE 24188-2 1250 FG 120.5 12.1 1 94 1656 10/18/02 LOT 108, SLOPE 24188-2 1254 FG 118.6 6.7 1 93 1657 10/18/02 LOT 115, SLOPE 24188.2 1251 FG 109.1 8.7 3 90 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tracl24188 March 6, 2003 Page 61 II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81\99-112\99112-53.tr24188. fdt 6'" I I I I '" Table No. A-1, Field Density Test Results . .... . Approx. Test Approx. Fut Dry Moist. Comp- Test Test Location Tract .5011 Remarks No. Date No, Etev. Below Test Density Cc;mtent Type action (90% Req, unl..snoted) . (ft) (ft) (pC!) (%) ('Yo) 1658 10/18/02 LOT 107, PARKWAY 24188.2 1256 3 102.3 12.4 3 85 Failed, See RT # 1658A 1658A 10/21/02 LOTS 106& 107, 24188-2 1256 3 120.4 5.6 1 94 RT of #1658 PARKWAY 1659 10/18/02 LOT ",, PARKWAY 24188-2 1257 2 120.9 6.4 1 94 1660 10/18/02 LOT 115, PARKWAY 24188-2 1254 2 115.3 7.2 1 90 1661 10/18/02 LOT 100, PARKWAY 24188-2 1253 4 104.9 6.7 3 87 Failed, See RT #1661A 1661A 10/21/02 LOT 101, PARKWAY 24188-2 1253 4 113.2 12.8 8 94 RTof#1661 1662 10/18/02 LOT 104, PARKWAY 24188-2 1255 4 104.5 8.5 3 86 Failed, See RT # 1662A 1662A 10/21/02 LOT 104, PARKWAY 24188-2 1255 4 109.2 8.8 8 90 RT pf #1662 1663 10/21/02 LOT 1 24188-2 1253 FG 115.0 6.5 1 90 1664 10/21/02 lOT 2 24188-2 1254 FG 118.0 8.5 1 92 1665 10/21/02 LOT 3 24188-2 1254 FG 116.1 4.5 1 91 1666 10/21/02 lOT 4 24188-2 1255 FG 120.6 8.2 1 94 1667 10/21/02 LOT 5 24188-2 1256 FG 123.8 6.4 1 97 1668 10/21/02 LOT 6 24188-2 1256 FG 123.9 6.2 1 97 1669 10/21/02 lOT 7 24188-2 1257 FG 120.6 6.9 1 94 1670 10/21/02 LOT 8 24188-2 1257 FG 110.0 9.5 3 91 1671 10/21/02 LOT 9 24188.2 1258 FG 117.7 7.1 1 92 1672 10/21/02 LOT 10 24188.2 1258 FG 123.6 6.6 1 97 1673 10/21/02 LOT 11 24188.2 1258 FG 123.9 5.0 1 97 1674 10/21/02 LOT 15 24188.2 1254 4 114.1 5.4 1 89 Failed, See RT #1674A 1674A 10/21/02 LOT 15 24188-2 1254 4 114.5 7.9 1 90 RT of #1674 1675 10/21/02 LOT 19 24188.2 1256 4 112.4 8.3 8 93 1676 10/21/02 LOT 13 24188.2 1255 4 112.1 9.9 8 93 1677 10/21/02 CORRIGAN CT. @ 24188.2 1259 2 111.6 9.6 8 92 LOT 65, WEST SIDE 1678 10/21/02 CORRIGAN CT. @ 24188-2 1259 2 101.7 13.0 8 84 Failed, See RT #1678A LOT 68, EAST SlOE 1678A 10/24/02 CORRIGAN CT. @ 24188-2 1259 2 108.9 13.3 8 90 AT of #1678 LOT 68, EAST SIDE 1679 10/21/02 DRISCOLL CT. @ 24188.2 1258 1 114.1 11.6 8 94 LOT 55, WEST SIDE 1680 10/21/02 DRISCOLL CT. @ 24188-2 1258 1 115.7 16.2 8 96 LOT 58, EAST SIDE 1681 10/21/02 BOOLEY CT. @ LOT 45, 24188-2 1259 2 116.8 11.7 8 97 WEST SIDE Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 62 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99.112\99112.53.tr24188.fdt <01 I I Tablll No. A-1,Field Density Test Rllsults . . . I Appro.. ToSt Approx, Fill pry MllI.t. -Camp.. Test Test Lcocaij"" Tract 51111 Remarks Date Ele,v. Below Test Oens1ty COl1tent Type action (90%Req.unlessnoted) No. No. (ft) (It) (pc!) ('/0) (%). 1682 10/21/02 80DLEY CT. @ LOT 48, 24188.2 1259 2 119.4 8.4 8 99 EAST SIDE 1683 10/21/02 8EAMER CT. @ LOT 62, 24188.2 1255 3 112.7 12.6 8 93 NORTH SIDE 1684 10/21/02 8EAMER CT. @ LOT 62, 24188.2 1255 3 111.8 14.9 8 92 NORTH SIDE 1685 10/21/02 8EAMER CT. @ LOT 52, 24186.2 1255 3 111.9 9.5 8 93 NORTH SIDE 1686 10/21/02 8EAMER CT. @ LOT 41, 24186-2 1259 2 112.9 10.4 6 93 NORTH SIDE 1687 10/22/02 LOT 21 24188.2 1261 FG 124.5 6.5 1 97 1688 10/22/02 LOT 22 24166.2 1262 FG 123.3 7.2 1 96 1669 10/22/02 LOT 23 24188.2 1265 FG 117.7 5.6 1 92 1690 10/22/02 LOT 24 24188.2 1266 FG 122.4 6.6 1 96 1691 10/22/02 LOT 25 24188-2 1267 FG 124.6 5.4 1 97 1692 10/22/02 LOT 26 24186-2 1267 FG 120.3 6.7 1 94 1693 10/22/02 LOT 27 24188-2 1267 FG 118.2 6.5 1 92 1694 10/22/02 LOT 28 24188-2 1267 FG 119.0 7.7 1 93 1695 10/22/02 LOT 29 24188.2 1267 FG 103.3 9.3 3 85 Failed, See RT 1/1695A 1695A 10/24/02 LOT 29 24186-2 1267 FG 109.4 9.6 3 90 RT of #1695 1696 10/22/02 LOT 30 24188-2 1266 FG 113.5 13.1 3 94 1697 10/22/02 BEAVEN CT. @ LOT 30 24188-2 1262 2 108.5 8.6 8 90 1698 10/22/02 8EAVEN CT. @ LOT 31 24186.2 1264 4 110.7 11.0 8 92 1699 10/22/02 SEA VEN CT. @ LOT 26 24186-2 1261 2 110.4 8.1 8 91 1700 10/22/02 LOT 12 24188.2 1256 6 112.8 9.6 3 93 1701 10/22/02 LOT 20 24188-2 1257 6 110.5 10.0 3 91 1702 10/22/02 LOT 18 24188-2 1255 6 113.1 10.3 3 93 1703 10/23/02 LOT 33 24186.2 1264 FG 112.6. 13.2 8 93 1704 10/23/02 LOT 34 24188-2 1264 FG 110.1 8.6 8 91 1705 10/23/02 LOT 35 24188.2 1264 FG 109.3 8.5 8 90 1706 10/23/02 LOT 46 24188-2 1264 FG 118.1 7.0 1 92 1707 10/23/02 LOT 45 24186-2 1263 FG 122.0 6.5 1 95 1708 10/23/02 lOT 44 24186-2 1262 FG 119.6 6.2 1 93 1709 10/23/02 LOT 43 24186.2 1261 FG 110.2 11.2 8 91 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract24188 March 6, 2003 Page 63 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt ~ II I Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 64 I . . Table No. A-1,Fielcl Density Test Results . . Test rest location 'Trac;t . Approx.Test APpro', flU Dry MOist. Soli Camp.. Remarks No; Date No; Efev. Below Test Density Content Type action (90% Req, unless noted) . .. 1ft) (ft) (PC!) (%) ('!o) 1710 10/23/02 LOT 42 24188.2 1258 FG 121.6 6.5 1 95 1711 10/23/02 LOT 31 24188-2 1265 FG 115.7 11.7 8 96 1712 10/23/02 LOT 32 24188-2 1265 FG 113.3 11.9 8 94 1713 10/23/02 LOT 36 24188-2 1263 FG 106.6 12.3 11 90 1714 10/23/02 LOT 37 24188-2 1263 FG 101.0 13.1 2 88 Failed, See RT #1714A 1714A 10/24/02 LOT 37 24188-2 1263 FG 104.8 19.1 2 92 RTof#1714 1715 10/23/02 LOT 38 24188-2 1261 FG 115.5 10.5 8 95 1716 10/23/02 LOT 39 24188-2 1254 FG 112.6 8.5 8 93 1717 10/23/02 LOT 40 24188.2 1256 FG 111.2 7.6 8 92 1718 10/23/02 LOT 41 24188.2 1257 FG 107.3 6.2 8 89 Failed, See RT #1718A 1718A 10/24/02 LOT 41 24188-2 1257 FG 109.6 8.1 8 91 Rlof#1718 1719 10/24/02 LOT 56 24188-2 1264 FG 121.3 8.4 1 95 1720 10/24/02 LOT 55 24188-2 1263 FG 119.8 10.0 1 94 1721 10/24/02 LOT 54 24188-2 1263 FG 115.1 7.0 1 90 1722 10/24/02 LOT 53 24188.2 1262 FG 109.7 6.6 8 91 1723 10/24/02 LOT 52 24188-2 1262 FG 114.0 7.2 8 94 1724 10/24/02 LOT 96 24188.2 1241 FG 116.2 7.1 1 91 1725 10/24/02 LOT 47 24188-2 1264 FG 118.1 7.4 1 92 1726 10/24/02 LOT 48 24188-2 1263 FG 118.3 6.9 1 92 1727 10/24/02 LOT 49 24188.2 1262 FG 119.8 10.4 1 94 1728 10/24/02 LOT 50 24188-2 1261 FG 114.6 5.3 1 90 1729 10/24/02 lOT 51 24188.2 1261 FG 115.4 6.3 1 90 1730 10/24/02 LOT 97 24188.2 1244 FG 114.6 7.1 1 90 1731 10/24/02 LOT 98 24188.2 1245 FG 116.8 6.0 1 91 1732 10/25/02 GREENE CIR., 24188.2 1245 2 110.6 10.5 8 91 STA15+25 1733 10/25/02 GREENE CIR., 24188-2 1240 2 110.0 10.1 8 91 STA 14+50 1734 10/25/02 CORRIGAN CT., 24188-2 1258 2 108.6 10.0 8 90 STA12+50 1735 10/25/02 GARCIA WAY, STA 11 +00 24188 1255 FG 110.3 11.2 3 91 1736 10/25/02 GARCIA WAY, STA 13+50 24188 1253 FG 110.0 9.5 3 91 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1 999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt ~~ I I Tl'ibleNo. A-1, Field Density Test Results Test ' Test.' Location Tract Approx. Test Appro.. Flit Dry Moist. Soil Comp- Remarks !No. Date No. Elev. Below Test DensIty COntent TyPO action (90%Req~, unless noted (ft) (ft) (PC!) (%) (%) 1737 10/28/02 LOT 12 24188.2 1258 FG 119.3 13.0 1 93 1738 10/28/02 LOT 13 24188-2 1257 FG 123.6 12.1 1 97 1739 10/28/02 LOT 14 24188-2 1257 FG 118.1 7.1 1 92 1740 10/28/02 LOT 15 24188-2 1256 FG 124.5 9.1 1 97 1741 10/28/02 LOT 16 24188-2 1256 FG 120.4 9.9 1 94 1742 10/28/02 LOT 17 24188-2 1255 FG 119.1 7.6 1 93 1743 10/28/02 LOT 18 24188-2 1256 FG 117.7 7.6 1 92 1744 10/28;02 LOT 19 24188-2 1258 FG 116.3 9.2 1 91 1745 10/28/02 LOT 20 24188.2 1259 FG 116.3 7.0 1 91 1746 10/28/02 BURNETT WAY, 24188-2 1248 2 115.0 4.7 1 90 STA 11+00 1747 10/28/02 8URNETT WAY, 24188.2 1249 2 118.0 4.6 1 92 STA 10+50 1748 10/29/02 LYLES DR.. STA 23+00 24188-3 1287 FG 112.6 12.1 3 93 1749 10/29/02 BRADSHAW DR., STA 24188 1256 FG 121.0 8.6 1 95 19+50 1750 10/29/02 GUADAGNO DR., 24188.3 1273 FG 118.7 10.9 1 93 STA 12+00 1751 10/29/02 R1VERADR., STA 15+00 24188 1265 FG 114.9 8.1 3 95 1752 10/29/02 BRADSHAW OR., STA 24188 1254 FG 109.5 7.7 3 91 12+00 1753 10/29/02 DAHLDR., ST A 12 + 50 24188 1255 FG 110.5 8.8 3 91 Field Density Tables Newland Homes Tract 24188 March 6, 2003 Page 65 I I I I I I I I I I Notes: 8TM: Bottom FG: Finish Grade I I The areas were scarified and recompacted, the degree of compaction was determined by visual observation and probing, no retests were taken. i: Repeated test number I I I .. I ConverseConsultanls CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\1999\81 \99-112\99112-53.tr24188.fdt <\0 //- II , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II' APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM ~\ I I I I D D D D D D D D D D D D D I I As. Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Page B.1 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM Laboratory tests were conducted on representative samples of the site soils for the purpose of evaluating physical properties and engineering characteristics. A brief description of the test procedures and results are presented below: Laboratory Maximum Densitv and Optimum Moisture Tests Laboratory maximum density and optimum moisture tests were performed on representative bulk samples of the site materials. These tests were performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard 01557-00 laboratory procedure. The results are presented in the following table. Table B-1, Summary of Laboratory Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Tests Soil . Maximum Optimum Type Soil Classification . Density . Moisture . . . . (pcf) ('!o) 1 CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine. to coarse-grained, brown. 128.0 9.0 2 CLAYEY SANDY SILT (ML), fine. to medium-grained, light brown. 114.5 14.5 3 SIL TV SAND (SM), fine. to medium'grained, with clay, brown. 121.0 12 4 SIL TV SAND (SM), fine. to medium-grained, trace of clay, brown. 129.0 9.0 5 SIL TV SAND (SM), fine- to medium-grained, trace of clay, brown. 130.6 8.6 6 SIL TV SAND (SM), fine- to medium-grained, brown. 133.5 8.0 7 SIL TV SAND (SM), fine- grained, brown. 132.0 9.0 8 SIL TV SAND (SM), fine- to medium.grained, with clay, brown. 121.0 11.5 9 SIL TV SAND (SM), fine- to coarse-grained, brown. 128.0 10.0 10 SIL TV CLAY I CLAYEY SILT (CLlML), brown. 113.5 12.5 11 SIL TV CLAY (CL), brown. 118.0 14.0 12 SILTY SAND (SM): trace of clay, brown. 127.8 8.4 12 SANDY CLAY (CL): fine- to medium- grained, brown. 119.0 12.5 ~ W Converse Consultants CCI ENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\2001 \81 \01.265\01265'30 .asb qz> I I I I I I . . . . . . . . . . . I I As.Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Page B.2 Expansion Index Tests Representative bulk samples were tested for expansion index to evaluate the expansion potential of materials encountered at the building pads. The test was conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 29-2. For test results, see the following table. Table No. B-2, Summary of Expansion Index Test Results Sample . '. . Representative E' '. Expansion. Tract No. '. Sampled from' xpanslon ' No. Lot No. Lots No: .. Index Potential 1 24188 32 1,2,31-33 6 Very Low 2 24188 15 3-13,15 55 Medium 3 24188 14 14 60 Medium - 4 24188 16 16-18 63 Medium 5 24188 20 19.21 53 Medium 6 24188 23 22-23; 26-27 51 Medium 7 24188 29 24, 25, 28-30 48 Low 8 24188 38 34-41 40 Low 9 24188 49 42-57 34 Low 10 24188 61 58-64 43 Low 11 24188 68 65.71 30 Low 12 24188 72 72-73 36 Low 13 24188-2 1 1-11 22 Low 14 24188-2 22 12-28 g Very Low 15 24188-2 29 29-30 30 Low 16 24188-2 34 31.35,38-43,52.56 30 Low 17 24188-2 37 36, 37 102 High 18 24188-2 47 44.51 32 Low 19 24188-2 57 57,58; 66 119 High 20 24188.2 65 59,64,65 71 Medium 21 24188-2 62 60-63 23 Low ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICEIJOBFILE\200 1 181 101.26510 1265.30 .asb q:? o II o g g 'g g g g m g g I I I I I I I As-Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188-2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Page B-3 '. Expansiol1 Expan~ion Sample Tract No. Sampled from Representative No. Lot No. Lots.No. Index . Potential 22 24188.2 68 67-74 94 High 23 24188.2 77 75.77 68 Medium 24 24188-2 79 78.80 67 Medium 25 24188.2 83 81-85 84 Medium . 26 24188-2 87 86.88 96 High 27 24188.2 91 89-92 34 Low 28 24188-2 94 93-95 79 Medium 29 24188-2 97 96.98 66 Medium 30 24188-2 104 99-104 44 Low 31 24188-2 105 105-107 39 Low 32 24188-2 108 108-118 20 Very Low 33 24188-3 2 1 and 2 90 Medium 34 24188.3 3 3-5 4 Very Low 35 24188.3 .6 6 and 7 23 Low 36 24188-3 39 8-9,37.44 32 Low 37 24188-3 28 10-18,24-29 57 Medium 38 24188.3 21 19.23 57 Medium 39 24188.3 33 30-36 16 Low 40 24188-3 50 45.50 21 Low 41 24188-3 56 51-58 49 Low 42 24188.3 65 59-67 57 Medium 43 24188.3 70 68.70 37 Low 44 24188.3 74 71.74 51 Medium 45 24188-3 75 75 39 Low 46 24188-3 77 76-78 53 Medium 47 24188.3 79 79-80 48 Low 48 24188.3 81 81 63 Medium ~ W Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICEIJOBFI LE\200 1 \81 10 1.26510 1265.30.asb DA n n n D D D D n o o D D o o o o D I I D As.Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Page B-4 .. I Sample Tract No. Sampled from. Representative Expansion I Expansion No. Lot No. Lots No. . .. .' Index .. . Potential 49 24188.3 82 82 54 Medium 50 24188.3 84 83.84 57 Medium 51 24188.3 86 85-86 28 Low 52 24188.3 87 87 53 Medium 53 24188-3 88 88-91 59 Medium 54 24188.3 100 92-100 29 Low R-value Tests Two representative soil samples were tested to evaluate the Resistance (R) value in accordance with the State of California Test Method 301-G. The test results are presented in the following table. Table No. B-3, Summary of R-value Test Results Sample:Location' , Bradshaw Dr. Sta. 19+90 J~"Valu~:.,-, ", 12 14 . . . .. - . :Soi I [)e!;cri plio'n:;, CLAYEY SAND (SC) SILTY SAND (SM) Lyles Dr. Sta. 23+00 Sand Equivalent Test Six (6) selected samples were tested in accordance with the Caltrans Method 217 to determine the Sand Equivalent (SE). Test results are summarized in the following table. Table No. B-4 SummarY of Sand Eauivalent Tests Sample Number/Depth .. Description Sand Equivalent (SE) 65/0.1' SILTY SAND (SM) 10 66/0.1' CLAYEY SAND (SC) 14 67/0.1' SILTY SAND (SM) 10 68/0.1' CLAYEY SAND (SC) 14 69/0.1' SILTY SAND (SM) 16 70/0.1' SILTY SAND (SM) 13 ~ ~ Converse Consultants CCI ENliOFFICEIJOBFILE\200 1 181 \01.26510 1265.30 .asb q:5' ID I I D I o o o o o o I I I I I I I I As.Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Page B.5 Grain Size Analvsis The grain-size distribution covers the quantitative distribution of particle sizes in soils. The particle distribution is used to aid in the classification of the soils. A total of four (4) tests were performed on representative samples in accordance with ASTM Standard 0422-63. For test results, see Drawing No. B-1 Gain Size Distribution Test Results. Direct Shear Tests Direct shear tests were performed on six (6) samples remolded to 90 percent of relative compaction at soaked moisture conditions. Samples contained in brass sampler rings were placed one at a time directly into the test apparatus and subjected to a range of normal loads appropriate for the anticipated conditions. Each sample was then sheared at a constant strain rate of 0.05 inch/minute. Shear deformation was recorded until a maximum of about 0.50-inch shear displacement was achieved. Peak strength was selected from the shear-stress deformation data and plotted to determine the shear strength parameters. Test results are presented in Drawings No. B-2 through B-7, Direct Shear Test Results. Consolidation Tests Data obtained from this test, performed on five (5) soil samples remolded to 90 percent of relative compaction were used to evaluate the settlement characteristics of on-site soils under loads. This test involved loading a specimen into the test apparatus, which contained porous stones to accommodate vertical drainage during testing. The specimen was then normally loaded. Resulting vertical deflections were recorded at various time periods, The load was increased after the sample reached a reasonable state of equilibrium. The samples were tested under field moisture conditions up to a normal load of 2 kips per square foot. The samples were then submerged with water. The test results are presented in Drawings No. B-8 through B-12, Consolidation Test Results. Corrosivitv Tests Bulk sample of the site soils was tested by M. J. Schiff and Associates of Upland, California, to evaluate soil corrosivity with respect to common construction materials. Results are included at the Appendix C, Soil Corrosivity Study. ~ ~ Converse Consultants CCI ENTlOFFICEIJOBFI LE\200 1 \81 \0 1-265\0 1265.30 .asb <\b . u U ,I I o o o I , I I I m I I I I I I As.Built Geology and Rough Grading Report Tracts No. 24188, 24188.2, and 24188.3 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Page B.6 Sample Storage Soil samples presently stored in our laboratory will be discarded 30 days after the date of this report unless this office receives a specific request to retain the samples for a longer period. ~ ~ Converse Consultants CCIENTlOFFICEIJOBF I LE\2001 181 10 1-265101265-30 .asb Cr\ m :. I m . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ Converse Consultants I ProjecllO: 01112-53,GPJ: Template: GRAIN SIZE U.S, SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES 4 2 U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 10 16 30 50 HYDROMETER 1/2 3 6 100 200 6 3 1.5 3/4 318 8 14 20 40 60 140 I I . I ~~ I I ,.. ~ 1\ \ 1\ \ --. 1\ 1\ ~ III1 \ 111.1 ~\ '\ I~ 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 >- J: C,2 60 UJ S >- 55 '" '" UJ 50 z u: >- 45 z UJ ~ 40 UJ a. 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 o 100 10 1 GRAIN SIZE IN MilLIMETERS 0.1 0.01 0.001 COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY coarse I fine coarse 1 medium 1 fine Boring No. Depth (ft) Description LL PL PI Cc Cu . LOT 23 1 -1.5' CLAYEY SAND (SC) IZI LOT 28 12 - 18' CLAYEY SAND (SC) .... LOT 49 12 - 18' SILTY SAND (SM) * LOT 57 0-1' SANDY CLAY (CL) Boring No. Depth (ft) 0100 060 030 010 %Gravel %Sand %Silt 1 %Clay . LOT 23 1 -1.5' 4.75 0.117 0.0 61.0 39.0 IZI LOT 28 12 -18' 4.75 0.267 0.0 63.0 37.0 .... LOT 49 12 -18' 4.75 0.248 0.0 63.7 36.3 * LOT 57 0-1' 4.75 0.075 0.0 40.0 60.0 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION RESULTS Project Name PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communitles Project No. 99-81-112-53 Drawing No. B.1 q~ I I 5,000 II I 4,000 I I - w "- 3,000 I >- <.9 z UJ '" >- (/) '" <( UJ J: (/) 2,000 I I I I 1,000 I I o o 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SURCHARGE PRESSURE, psI I I BORING NO. LOT 23 DEPTH (ft) 1 -1.5' OESCRIPTION CLAYEY SAND (SC) COHESION (psn 300 FRICTION ANGLE (degrees). 28 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 13.1 ORY OENSITY (pcn 109.1 I I I I ~ Converse Consultants I Project JD: 01112-53 GPJ; Template: DIRECT SHEAR NOTE: Ultimate Strength. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Project Name PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99-81-112-53 Drawing No. B-2 q~ ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5,000 4,000 - w "- 3,000 I >- <.9 z UJ '" >- (/) '" L5 J: (/) 2,000 1,000 o o 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SURCHARGE PRESSURE, psI BORING NO. LOT 28 DEPTH (ft) 12.18' DESCRIPTION CLAYEY SAND (SC) COHESION (psn 400 FRICTION ANGLE (degrees): 26 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 10.7 DRY DENSITY (pcQ 114.3 NOTE: Ultimate Strength, Sample Remolded to 90% relative compaction. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS I ~ Converse Consultants I ProjecllD: 01112-53GPJ; Template: DIRECT SHEAR Project Name PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99.81-112-53 Drawing No. B-3 \cO I II 5,000 I I 4,000 I I 1;; "- 3,000 I >- <.9 z UJ '" >- (/) '" <( UJ J: (/) 2,000 I I I I 1,000 I I o o 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 I I SURCHARGE PRESSURE, psf I BORING NO. : LOT 33 DEPTH (ft) 0 DESCRIPTION CLAYEY SAND (SC) COHESION (psn 250 FRICTION ANGLE (degrees): 30 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 13.4 DRY DENSITY (pcQ 107.1 I I NOTE: Ultimate Strength, Sample Remolded to 90% relative compaction. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS I ~ Converse Consultants I Project ID: 01112-53.GPJ; Template: DIRECT SHEAR Project Name PASEQ DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99.81.112.53 Drawing No B-4 \0\ II I 5,000 I I 4,000 I I 'ti "- 3,000 I- f- <.9 z UJ '" >- (/) '" <( UJ J: (/) 2,000 I I I I 1,000 I I o o 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SURCHARGE PRESSURE, psI I I I BORING NO. LOT 49 DEPTH (ft) 12 -18' DESCRIPTION SILTY SAND (SM) COHESION (psn 650 FRICTION ANGLE (degrees): 20 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 10.9 DRY DENSITY (pcQ 110.3 I I I ~ Converse Consultants I Project 10: 01112-53GPJ; Template: DIRECT SHEAR NOTE: Ultimate Strength, Sample Remolded to 90% relative compaction. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Project Name PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99-81.112-S3 Drawing No. B-S \ 0 "Z>- I I 5,000 I I 4,000 I I - w "- 3,000 I >- <.9 z UJ '" >- (/) '" L5 J: (/) 2,000 I I I I 1,000 I I o o 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 I SURCHARGE PRESSURE, psI I BORING NO. LOT 57 DEPTH (ft) 0.,' DESCRIPTION SANDY CLAY (CL) COHESION (psn 400 FRICTION ANGLE (degrees). 17 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 14.5 DRY DENSITY {pcQ 106.5 I I I NOTE: Ultimate Strength. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS I @ Converse Consultants I Project 10: 01112-SJ.GPJ; Template: DIRECT SHEAR Project Name PASED DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecuta, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99-81-112-53 Drawing No. B-6 ,03 II I I 5,000 I I 4,000 I I - w "- 3,000 I >- (9 z UJ '" >- (/) '" L5 J: en 2,000 I I I I 1,000 I I o o 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 I SURCHARGE PRESSURE, pst I BORING NO. LOT68 DEPTH (ft) '0' DESCRIPTION CLAYEY SAND (SC) COHESION (psn '50 FRICTION ANGLE (degrees): 2. MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 11.2 DRY DENSITY (pcn 109.1 I I I NOTE: Ultimate Strength. Sample Remolded to 90% Relative Compaction. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS I @ Converse Consultants I Project 10: 01112-53.GPJ; Template: DIRECT SHEAR Project Name PASED DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99-81-112-53 Drawing No. B.7 \cf\ II I ;;e a ~ ~ '------ --. '- - ~ 5 '------ -----.. "-- ",- '--I--- ~ '-------- ~ - 0 5 0 1,000 10,000 105 I I I I I ;;i ~ 1 >- (/) I I I I I I I 2 100 STRESS, psI I BORING NO. LOT 23 I DEPTH (ft) 1 -1.5' DESCRIPTION. CLAYEY SAND (SC) MOISTURE I DRY DENSITY I PERCENT I VOID CONTENT (%) (pcQ SATURATION RATIO INITIAL 12.5 109.2 65 0.510 FINAL 16.6 "6 100 0.422 I I I NOTE: Solid Circles Indicate Readings After Addition Of Water, Sample Remolded to 90% relative compaction. CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS I ~ Converse Consultants I ProjecllD: 01112-53.GPJ; Template: CONSOLIDATION Project Name PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99.81-112-53 Drawing No. B-B \r:$" I * u ~ ~ '-...... ----. '--- '------- '----., '" 5 '- r----r--. ~ h ~ ,. 0 - -- - - -- - -- -- -- - -_.- _._---~-_.._- ---- -- -- - -- -- ----- -~- - - - -- - 5 0 I I I I I I z ~ 1 >- (/) I I I I I I 2 100 1,000 10,000 105 STRESS, psI I BORING NO. LOT 28 I DEPTH (ft) 12 -18' DESCRIPTION. CLAYEY SAND (SC) MOISTURE I DRY DENSITY I PERCENT I VOID CONTENT (%) (pcn SATURATION RATIO INITIAL 10 114.5 60 0.407 FINAL 15.2 '18.2 100 0.363 I I I NOTE: Solid Circles Indicate Readings After Addition Of Water, Sample Remolded to 90% relative compaction. CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS I ~ Converse Consultants I ProjecllD: 01112-53.GPJ: Template: CONSOLIDATION Project Name PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99-81.112-53 Drawing No. B-9 \O~ I I I 1 u ----- -------. '-------- ------.... ~ i'--", 5 l- \ - 0 5 0 1,000 10,000 105 I I I I '<!' I z ~ 1 >- (/) I I I I I 2 100 STRESS, psI I BORING NO. LOT 49 T DEPTH (ft) '2.18' DESCRIPTION: SILTY SAND (SM) MOISTURE I DRY DENSITY I PERCENT I VOID CONTENT (%) (pcn SATURATION RATIO INITIAL '0.9 109.7 57 0.504 FINAL 15.3 116.1 100 0.421 I I I NOTE: Solid Circles Indicate Readings After Addition Of Water, Sample Remolded to 90% relative compaction. CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS I ~ Converse Consultants I Pcoj'" ID. 01112-53 GPJ. T'mpl'" CONSOLlOATION Project Name PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99-81-112-53 Drawing No. B.10 \01 I z ~ 1 >- (/) u ---------- r----.. ----- --, >------- '----- "" \ "-i"- 5 ~ ~ "" "'" ", 0 5 0 I I I I I I 'if'- I I I I I I 2 100 1,000 10,000 105 STRESS, psI I BORING NO. LOT 57 I DEPTH (ft) : 0.1' DESCRIPTION: SANDY CLAY (CL) MOISTURE I DRY DENSITY I PERCENT I VOID CONTENT (%) (pen SATURATION RATIO INITIAL 14.9 105.6 70 0.562 FINAL 21.1 107.1 100 0.540 I I I NOTE: Solid Circles Indicate Readings After Addition Of Water, Sample Remolded to 90% relative compaction. CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS I @ Converse Consultants I Peoj",! 10 01112~53.GPJ. T.mpl'" CONSOLlOATlON Project Name PASEO DEL SOL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY Temecula, California For: Newlands Communities Project No. 99-81.112.53 Drawing No. B-11 \fi> I I 1 LT ~ --------- ---- --, >-- ~ ~ 5 !" [\ \ \ h \ 0 \ . 5 0 1,000 10,000 105 I I I I I "" I z ~ 1 >- (/) I I I I 2 100 I STRESS, psf I BORING NO. LOT 68 I DEPTH (ft) 10' DESCRIPTION. CLAYEY SAND (SC) MOISTURE I DRY DENSITY I PERCENT I VOID CONTENT (%) (pcn SATURATION . RATIO INITIAL 11.1 108.7 57 0.517 FINAL 15.3 118.1 100 0.397 I I I NOTE: Solid Circles Indicate Readings After Addition Of Water, Sample Remolded 10 90% relative compaction. CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS I @ Converse Consultants Project No. 99-81-112.53 Drawing No. B-12 \0<\ I Project 10: 01112-53.GPJ; Template: CONSOLIDATION II ,I I I , I I ,I I II I I I I I I I I I I II APPENDIX C SOIL CORROSIVITY STUDY \\t> 1'1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -~ M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. Consulting Corrosion Engineers - Since 1959 Sample ill !"~::"\~:::'~'j;:!:t "-""..'.",-_,,,"'-'. .',.w:.;<~:'l~.;;.::.'_ ,; ..._ Resistivity as-received saturated pH Electrical Conductivity Chemical Analyses Cations calcium magnesium sodium Anions carbonate bicarbonate chloride sulfate :~ :;: ':-'-'~: :::' Uuits ohm-em ohm-em mS/cm Ca2+ Mg2+ Nal+ mglkg mglkg mglkg cot mglkg HCO/ mglkg Cll- mglkg sot mg/kg Other Tests ammonium NH41+ mg/kg nitrate NO,'- mglkg sulfide S'- qual Redox mv 1308 Monte Vista Avenue, Suite 6 Upland, CA 91786-8224 Phone: 909/931-1360 Table I - Laboratory Tests on Soil Samples Paseo sel TR 24188 Your #99-81-112-53, MJS&A #02-1082LAB 5-Nov-02 Lot # 49 @12"}8tt '._h' "'1- 19,000 1,800 8.5 0.11 16 NO 57 NO 79 70 NO na na na .: ;~J''':,:;1~-j.~,!f;;r;;1j~:::~];:;t:r\~;/::~l~,,:~''''r:- --= -::--:-..,;t' :: na Electrical conductivity in millisiemens/cm and chemical analysis were made on a 1:5 soil-ta-water extract. mg/kg ~ milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) of dry soil. Redox ~ oxidation-reduction potential in millivolts NO = not detected na = not analyzed Page I of 1 \\\