Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout061306 CSD Minutes I I I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT JUNE 13,2006 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:58 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Washington, and Comerchero ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Roberts Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 28 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 28.1 Approve the minutes of May 23, 2006. 29 Temecula Communitv Services District Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Annual Maintenance Aareements RECOMMENDATION: 29.1 Approve the Annual Maintenance and Construction Contracts for Fiscal Year 2006- 2007 with: 1. Rizzo Construction for an amount not to exceed $200,000.00 2. Moore Fence for an amount not to exceed $150,000.00 3. Strong Painting for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 4. Alexander Pacific for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 5. N.P.G., Inc. for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 6. Imperial Paving Company, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 7. Monteleone Construction, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 R:IMinutes1061306 I I I 8. Craftsmen Plumbing for an amount not to exceed $75,000.00 9. Power Distributors, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 30 Second Amendment to the Elevator Service and Monitorina Aareement with ThyssenKruoo Elevator for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 RECOMMENDATION: 30.1 Approve the Second Amendment with ThyssenKrupp Elevator for $7,100.00 to provide Elevator Service and Monitoring of all City elevators and extend the Agreement to June 20, 2007. 31 Doa Park at Redhawk Community Park RECOMMENDATION: 31 .1 Approve a temporary dog park and the construction of a permanent dog park facility at Redhawk Community Park; 31.2 Find that the proposed off-leash area is exempt from the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act because it is categorically exempt under the Class 1 Categorical Exemption, Existing Facilities (14 Cal. Code Regs. ~15301), Class 4 Categorical Exemption, Minor Alterations to Land (14 Cal. Code Regs. ~15304), and Class 23 Categorical Exemption, Normal Operations of Facilities for Public Gatherings and direct the City Manager to file a Notice of Exemption as required by law. (Item No. 31 was pulled for separate action, see pages 3-6.) 32 Third Amendment to the Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Aareement with West Coast Arborists for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 RECOMMENDATION: 32.1 Approve the Third Amendment with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for $100,000.00 plus a 10% contingency of $10,000.00 to provide Citywide Tree Maintenance Service and extend the Agreement to June 30, 2007. 33 Second Amendment to the Facility Alarm System Service and Monitorina Aareement with Comouter Alert Systems for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 RECOMMENDATION: 33.1 Approve the Second Amendment with Computer Alert Systems, Inc. for $30,000.00 to provide Alarm System Service and Monitoring for City Facilities and extend the Agreement to June 30, 2007. R:\Minutesl061306 2 I I I 34 First Amendment to the Water Manaaement/Maintenance Services Aareement with Marine Biochemists for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 RECOMMENDATION: 34.1 Approve the First Amendment with Marine Biochemists for $78,260.00 to provide Water Management/Maintenance Services for Harveston Lake Park and Temecula Duck Pond and extend the Agreement to June 30, 2007. 35 Second Amendment to the Janitorial Services Aareement for Park Restrooms and Picnic Shelters with Morris Myers Maintenance for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 RECOMMENDATION: 35.1 Approve the Second Amendment with Morris Myers Maintenance for $80,000.00 to provide Janitorial Services for Park Restrooms and Picnic Shelters and extend the Agreement to June 30, 2007. 36 City Facilities Janitorial Services RECOMMENDATION: 36.1 Approve the Agreement with T and T Janitorial in the amount of $119,486.88 for Janitorial Maintenance Services for City Facilities. MOTION: Director Edwards moved to approye Consent Calendar Item Nos. 28-30 and 32-36 (Item No. 31 was pulled for separate discussion). Director Washington seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Director Roberts who was absent. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION 31 Doa Park at Redhawk Community Park RECOMMENDATION: 31.3 Approye a temporary dog park and the construction of a permanent dog park facility at Redhawk Community Park; 31.4 Find that the proposed off-leash area is exempt from the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act because it is categorically exempt under the Class 1 Categorical Exemption, Existing Facilities (14 Cal. Code Regs. ~15301), Class 4 Categorical Exemption, Minor Alterations to Land (14 Cal. Code Regs. ~15304), and Class 23 Categorical Exemption, Normal Operations of Facilities for Public Gatherings and direct the City Manager to file a Notice of Exemption as required by law. R:IMinutesl061306 3 I I I Director of Community Services Parker provided a staff report (of written material), advising that at the June 12, 2006, Community Services Commission meeting, the Commission heard testimony from approximately 45 indiYiduals; that approximately 13 were opposed to the construction of the dog park; that approximately 32 individuals were in support of the proposed dog park at Redhawk Community Park; and that at the conclusion of the meeting, the Community Services Commission, with the exception of Commissioner Hogan who was absent, voted to approve the temporary/permanent dog park at Redhawk Community Park. Advising that the City will be strictly enforcing the leash law, City Manager Nelson stated the following: . That Anima/ Friends of the Valley will be assisting the City with enforcing the leash law · That the City's Code Enforcement will also be enforcing the leash law · That the newly approved Park Ranger position will as well be monitoring the park for violations · That signs will be posted throughout the park, displaying the rules/regulations of the dog park · That if a dog were not licensed or vaccinated, the dog will not be able to use the dog park . That indiyiduals who violate the leash law will be cited. Clarifying for the Directors and the public, Director of Community Services Parker also noted that all dogs utilizing the dog park would need to be licensed, vaccinated, and on a dog leash until the dog enters the unleashed area and that individuals who do not abide by the rules will be cited. Referencing Director Naggar's comments, all dog owners will be accessing the dog park at their own risk and that dog owners will be expected to bring only those dogs that are well socialized to the park. Referencing the implementation of a dog park at Redhawk Community Park, City Attorney Thorson noted that based on all provisions of the City's Code, the City would have full authority to adopt an off-leash designation for the Redhawk Community Park; that individuals had an opportunity to speak at the Community Services Commission meeting; that there is no language in the old County Zoning Ordinance No. 348, in the current Zoning Code, in the Redhawk Specific Plan, in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), or in any other stated law that would require extensive notification my mail prior to making this particular change; and that the proposed modifications would be viewed as typical park recreation and, therefore, would not require the formal notification process. Ms. Willa Bagwell, representing Anima/ Friends of the Valley, noted the following: . That officers will be patrolling and enforcing the City's leash law · That any dogs over four months of age would be required to be vaccinated and licensed . That any dog owner caught violating the leash law will be cited . That public safety would be the main concern. R:IMinutesl061306 4 I I I In response to Director Edwards' query, City Attorney Thorson stated that there would be stronger enforcement mechanisms available if it were the desire of the City Council and that administrative/civil penalties would be available, advising that the fines would substantially increase. Ms. Bagwell noted that the fine would increase each time an individual is cited; that the fourth citation would be written as misdemeanor; that fines would range from $50 to $250; and that a civil penalty could go up to as much as $2,500 a day. At this time, the public hearing was opened. The following individuals spoke in favor of the proposed dog park at Redhawk Community Park: . Mr. Steve Mondero, Temecula . Ms. Donna Weiss, Temecula . Ms. Lynne Sorrentino, Temecula . Ms. Lois Miller, Temecula . Mr. Marc Green, Temecula . Mr. Michael Slocum, Temecula . Ms. Patty White, Temecula . Ms. Vikki Green, Temecula . Ms. Catherine Bagdasarian, Temecula . Mr. Randy Yount, Temecula . Ms. Trina Snow, Temecula . Mr. David Rothstein, Temecula . Mr. Matt Pegues, Temecula. The above-mentioned individuals spoke in favor of the proposed dog park at Redhawk Community Park for the following reasons: · That such a park would meet a certain need in the City of Temecula . That many dog owners in the community would use the proposed dog park · That the construction of three dog parks in the City ( northern, central, and southern) would be beneficial to the community as a whole · That the proposed Redhawk Community Park location would be an excellent choice for a dog park · That the only individuals against the dog park would be those residents that abut the park · That Redhawk Community Park was built for the whole community, not just for those residents who abut the park . That Redhawk Community Park is a large enough park to accommodate many uses/users; that the proposed area would be far enough removed from the play area as well as the entrance to the park The following individuals spoke in opposition to a dog park at Redhawk Community Park: . Ms. Freddie Wiemer, Temecula . Mr. Don Swift, Temecula . Ms. Betty Johnson, Temecula R:IMinulesl061306 5 I I I . Mr. Dennis Trombine, Temecula . Mr. Ken Johnson. The above-mentioned individuals spoke in opposition to the dog park at Redhawk Community Park for the following reasons: · That dog owners have been in violation of the leash law for years · That dog owners have not been responsible in cleaning up after their dogs · That Wolf Valley Park should be considered versus Redhawk Community Park . That public noticing was not properly administered . That other sites for a dog park should be explored . That a dog park in the Redhawk Community would increase traffic. At 9:08 pm, the public hearing was closed. Understanding the need for dog parks and advising that he is not a dog owner, Director Washington noted that, in his opinion, Redhawk Community Park would be an ideal location for a dog park. Noting that every park in the City should be used to its fullest capacity, Director Naggar stated that, in his opinion, Redhawk Community Park is not being utilized to its fullest extent; expressed his support of the proposed location; and requested that a zero-tolerance protocol with regard to the leash law be implemented. Referencing the concerns of the opposing individuals, Director Edwards noted that it would be her opinion that all issues of concern have been addressed; concurred with zero tolerance for leash law violators; supported the construction of a dog park at Redhawk Community Park; and requested that a restroom be installed at this park. Speaking in full support of the proposed dog park at Redhawk Community Park, President Comerchero noted that the proposed park is a large enough park to accommodate a dog park as well as other everyday uses; stated that Redhawk Community Park, in his opinion, I currently underutilized; relayed that the fenced area for dogs will allow safer opportunity for other that play at the park; and viewed the construction of a dog park as an amenity that the park will not be changed but rather will have another amenity added to it. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve staff recommendation, subject to the adoption of zero tolerance with regard to leash laws and licensing/vaccination laws. Director Washington seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Director Roberts who was absent. Director Comerchero thanked all the above-mentioned speakers for their input. R:IMinulesl061306 6 CSD BUSINESS I 37 Review and Adootion of FY2006-2007 Annual Ooeratina Budaet 37.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 06-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2006-07 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS By way of a PowerPoint presentation, General Manager Nelson reviewed the proposed Annual Operating Budget (as per staff report and as was presented at the May 17, 2006, Budget Workshop). General Manager Nelson, for Director Edwards, noted that funding for the TAP Program will not be an issue. With regard to the REST Program, General Manager Nelson, for Director Naggar, advised that approximately $21 million of REST monies, over the past five years, has benefited the residents and that approximately $30 million of REST monies since the inception of the program. I Concurring with Director Edwards' request to construct a restroom at the Redhawk Community Park, General Manager Nelson noted that funds necessary for the construction of a restroom will be made available. Commenting on the history of the Redhawk Community Park, Director Washington stated that the City does not build 14-acre passive parks and viewed this large park as a waste of beautiful park space that is not being enjoyed by the community. The District Members concurred that it would be its will to construct a restroom at the Redhawk Community Park. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to adopt Resolution No. CSD 06-07. The motion was seconded by Director Edwards and electronic yote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Director Roberts who was absent. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Community Services Director Parker thanked his staff for its efforts associated with the Recreation Brochure and encouraged the public to take advantage of the many various activities. CSD GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT No additional comment. I R:IMinulesl061306 7 CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS I No additional comments. CSD ADJOURNMENT At 9:40 p.m., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 27, 2006, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ATTEST: I I R:IMinulesl061306 8