HomeMy WebLinkAbout10262023 TS Commission AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II].
AGENDA
TEMECULA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
OCTOBER 26, 2023 - 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Carter
FLAG SALUTE: Chairperson Richardson
ROLL CALL: Ackerman, Carter, Matics, Richardson, Sullivan
PUBLIC COMMENT
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not
listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at
the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in
the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is
prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email
comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to
TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy
regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request
specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is
provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent
Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting
by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order
received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited .
Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must
be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to
TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy
regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54.
1.Approve Action Minutes of July 27, 2023 and September 28, 2023
That the Traffic Safety Commission approve the action minutes of July
27, 2023 and September 28, 2023.
Recommendation:
Page 1
Traffic Safety Commission Agenda October 26, 2023
Action Minutes - July 27, 2023
Action Minutes - September 28, 2023
Attachments:
BUSINESS
Members of the public may address the Commission on Business items that appear on the agenda. Each
speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a
speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still
images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments
may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to
the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to
TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy
regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54.
2.Camino Piedra Rojo - Stop Controls Analysis
That the Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing
Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and
Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta.
2. Recommend staff implement striped pedestrian crosswalks at
intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta
pending City Council adoption of Multi-Way Stop Controls.
Recommendation:
Agenda Report
Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
Attachments:
3.Complete Streets Policy
That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report .Recommendation:
Agenda Report
Draft Complete Streets Policy Document
Attachments:
4.Electric Bicycles Feedback
That the Traffic Safety Commission provide feedback for future
consideration by Commission and City Council.
Recommendation:
Page 2
Traffic Safety Commission Agenda October 26, 2023
Agenda Report
Temecula Municipal Code for Bicycles on Sidewalks
TVUSD E-Bkes Letter
California E-Bike Law Summary
Carlsbad E-Bike Policy.pdf
Lake Forest E-Bike Policy.pdf
Solana Beach E-Bike Policy.pdf
Attachments:
5.Median Modification on Rancho California Road between Yukon Road and Margarita Road
That the Traffic Safety Commission approve the proposed median
modification on Rancho California Road between Yukon Road and
Margarita Road.
Recommendation:
Agenda Report
Exhibit A – Proposed Median Modification
Attachments:
6.Reschedule Traffic Safety Commission Meetings of November and December 2023
That the Traffic Safety Commission direct Staff to cancel and reschedule
the regular meetings of November and December 2023, and perform the
appropriate posting and noticing requirements per the Government Code.
Recommendation:
Agenda ReportAttachments:
DIRECTOR REPORT
7.California Highway Patrol Report
California Highway Patrol Report - September 2023Attachments:
8.Police Chief's Report
Police Chief's Report - September 2023Attachments:
9.Traffic Engineer's Report
Traffic Engineer's Report - September 2023Attachments:
DIRECTOR REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Public Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, November
23, 2023, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Page 3
Traffic Safety Commission Agenda October 26, 2023
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting
of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Public Traffic Safety Commission regarding any item on the
agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during
normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's
website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding
any item on the agenda, please contact the Public Works Department at (951) 694-6444.
Page 4
Item No. 1
1
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
JULY 27, 2023 - 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairperson Carter
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Carter
ROLL CALL: Ackerman (absent), Carter, Matics, Richardson (absent), Sullivan
PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS
The following individual(s) addressed the City Council:
• Louis Towd (Item #2) • Eric Mickillicen (Item #2)
• Liselle D. (Item #2) • Greg Cole (Item #2)
• Amy (Item #2) • Donna Cole (Item #2)
• Madelyn (Item #2) • Ashley Arms (Item #2)
• Kenzie Ellis (Item #2) • Stephen Benavides (Item #2)
• Julie (Item #2) • Steve Sommers (Item #2)
• Kev (Item #2) • Stacie Jalzuttis (Item #2)
• Mark LeTourneau (Item #2) • Molly Howard (Item #2)
• Yolanda Wagner (Item #2) • James Howard (Item #2)
• Israel Gutierrez (Item #2) • Robert Chen (Item #2)
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approve Action Minutes of May 25, 2023
Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes
of May 25, 2023.
Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0; Ackerman and Richardson absent): Motion by Sullivan,
Second by Matics. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Ackerman and Richardson
absent.
BUSINESS
2. Ynez Road/De Portola Road Traffic Calming Workshop
Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Direct Staff to implement the near-term traffic calming measures on
Ynez Road-De Portola Road.
2. Direct Staff to continue to study the long-term traffic calming measures
on Ynez Road-De Portola Road.
2
Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0; Ackerman and Richardson absent): Motion by Sullivan,
Second by Matics. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Ackerman and Richardson
absent.
DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and File)
4. Police Chief’s Report
5. Traffic Engineer’s Report
DIRECTOR REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:57 PM, the Traffic Safety Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Thursday, August 24,
2023, at 6:00 PM, in the Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Robert Carter, Chairperson
Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
1
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 - 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairperson Carter
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Matics
ROLL CALL: Ackerman, Carter, Matics, Richardson, Sullivan (absent)
PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA ITEMS
The following individual(s) addressed the Commission:
• Adriana Mejia
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approve Action Minutes of July 27, 2023
Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes
of July 27, 2023.
Action minutes to be brought to next meeting for approval due to two abstentions and one
absence.
BUSINESS
2. Coordinated Signal Timing Report for PW18-05 Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade
Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on the
coordinated signal timing for project PW18-05 Fiber Optic Communication
System Upgrade.
Receive and file only, no action.
3. Stop Controls and Pedestrian Analysis for Mercedes Street between 6th Street and 3rd Street
Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing
Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersections of Mercedes Street/5th
Street and Mercedes Street/4th Street.
2. Recommend staff implement striped pedestrian crosswalks at
intersections of Mercedes Street/6th Street, Mercedes/5th Street,
Mercedes/4th Street, and Merecedes/3rd Street pending City Council
2
adoption of Multi-Way Stop Controls.
Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0; Sullivan absent): Motion by Ackerman, Second by
Richardson. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Sullivan absent.
DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and File)
4. California Highway Patrol Report
5. Police Chief’s Report
6. Traffic Engineer’s Report
DIRECTOR REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:00 PM, the Traffic Safety Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Thursday, October 26,
2023, at 6:00 PM, in the Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Robert Carter, Chairperson
Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Item No. 2
1
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 2023
SUBJECT: Camino Piedra Rojo – Stop Controls Analysis
PREPARED BY: Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer
Erick Escobedo, Associate Engineer II
RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls
at the intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta.
2. Recommend staff implement striped pedestrian crosswalks at intersection of Camino
Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta pending City Council adoption of
Multi-Way Stop Controls.
BACKGROUND: In late 2022, City of Temecula staff received a public comment at Traffic
Safety Commission meeting with a request to consider the feasibility of implementing all-way
stop controls to address concerns of excessive speeding and pedestrian crossing conditions at the
intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta (Exhibit A). The
citizen referenced concerns with speeding and uncontrolled pedestrian crossings at this
intersection specifically during pickup and drop-off times for nearby middle school as there are
no convenient controlled pedestrian crossings nearby. The request for an all-way stop and
pedestrian controls at the intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida
Bicicleta would provide additional controlled access for students heading to/from Vail Ranch
Middle School. In 2023, several field reviews were performed by staff at this intersection and,
based on vehicular and pedestrian activity observed, it was determined that the intersection of
Camino Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta warranted further analysis for stop and
pedestrian controls.
Camino Piedra Rojo is a forty-four (44) foot wide residential collector roadway providing access
to numerous single-family residences between Butterfield Stage Road and Vail Ranch Parkway.
The posted speed limit on Camino Piedra Rojo is 25 MPH due to several residential homes
fronting this roadway and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on is approximately 4,380
ADT. Recent speed data collection confirmed an 85th percentile speed of 33 MPH for this stretch
of Camino Piedra Rojo.
2
Parown Drive is a forty (40) foot wide local residential roadway that provides access to Camino
Piedra Rojo for numerous single-family residences located within the area. Parown Drive has a
speed limit of 30 MPH and carries approximately 1,048 ADT.
Avenida Bicicleta is a forty (40) foot wide local residential roadway that provides access to
Camino Piedra Rojo for numerous single-family residences located within the neighborhood.
Avenida Bicicleta has a speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 201 ADT.
In August 2023, staff generated speed and volume data during the school semester from January
2023 thru May 2023 using Streetlight Data software. Over this five (5) month period, review of
prevailing (85th percentile) speeds indicates that speeds vary from 30 to 33 miles per hour during
peak AM and PM hours on posted 25 MPH segments of Camino Piedra Rojo. The results of the
speed data review indicate that most speeding is occurring during peak AM and PM hours.
The collected volume data was used to evaluate entering volumes and prevailing speeds for the
intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta. In addition to the data
collection, a review of intersection characteristics and conditions were performed, which
included an evaluation of sight distance, collision history, and completion of a multi -way stop
warrant analysis at both intersections.
An evaluation of sight distance was performed at the intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and
Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of 150 feet is required
for the posted 25 mph speed limit on Camino Piedra Rojo. The results of the evaluation are
shown in the table below:
Location Sight Distance Required Visibility
(Posted 25 MPH)
Parown Drive (Southbound)
Looking East
Looking West
Avenida Bicicleta (Northbound)
Looking East
Looking West
300’
220’
225’
200’
150’
150’
150’
150’
As shown, the visibility at the intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida
Bicicleta is more than adequate for the posted speed limit.
A review of the collision history for the three (3) year period from June 1, 2020 to May 31, 2023,
indicates there were no (0) reported collisions at the intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and
Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta.
The Multi-Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets’ warrant criteria was used to
evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs at the intersection. The warrants allow for the
installation of multi-way stop signs when the following conditions are satisfied:
3
1. Minimum Traffic Volumes
a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is equal
to or greater than three hundred (300) vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of
an average day; and
b. The combined vehicular volume and pedestrian volume from the minor street is
equal to or greater than one hundred (100) per hour for the same eight (8) hours.
2. Collision History
a. Three (3) or more reported collisions within a twelve (12) month period of a type
susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include
right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Roadway Characteristics
a. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000)
vehicles per day,
b. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more
away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs.
c. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent
(40/60%) split; and
d. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower.
Warrants for Minimum Traffic Volumes, Collision History and Roadway Characteristics must be
met to justify the installation of a multi-way stop. Other criteria that may be considered when
evaluating the need for multi-way stop signs include:
4. Visibility
a. The intersections sight distance is less than:
150 feet for 25 MPH
200 feet for 30 MPH
250 feet for 35 MPH
5. The need to control left-turn conflicts.
6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high
pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers.
7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route to School plan.
8. There are no traffic signals or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of the
intersection.
4
9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation
needs of the residential area.
The multi-way stop warrant analysis performed found that the required Warrants 1, 2 & 3 were
not satisfied and all-way stop controls are not justified at the intersection based on quantitative
data.
The Policy does however provide the flexibility to consider the need to control vehicle and
pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks
and activity centers. During field reviews, staff noticed elevated amounts of vehicular and
pedestrian traffic at the existing uncontrolled striped crosswalk at the intersection of Camino
Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta which provides access to Vail Ranch Middle
School. Staff observed that many of these school age pedestrians where crossing the uncontrolled
crosswalk without an available crossing guard and were dependent on vehicles yielding for them
to cross safely. Staff observed elevated speeds and volumes on Camino Piedra Rojo during
morning school drop-off and afternoon pickup while witnessing several close calls with
distracted pedestrians. Based on the review of the intersection under these criteria, and the fact
that it acts as a suggested school route to a school for residents in the area, staff has determined
there is justification for all-way stop controls at the intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and
Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta
Staff recommends establishing all-way stop controls and striped pedestrian crosswalks at the
intersection of Camino Piedra Rojo and Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta.
FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
Major Street: 25 MPH
Minor Street:25 MPH
Yes No X
7:00 AM 8:00 AM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM Hour
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes No X
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes No X
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes No X
Yes X No
250 feet for 35 MPH
Satisfied
195 325
100
207
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
3 OR MORE
the intersection.
9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic
circulation needs of the residential area.
5. The need to control left-turn conflicts.
8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of
7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan.
6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate
high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers.
MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets)
Critical Approach Speed
Critical Approach Speed
Satisfied
NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
300 385
per day,
1. Minimum Vehicular Volume
Camino Piedra Rojo
Parown Drive/Avenida Bicicleta
Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Total All
437Approaches
Combined Vehicular
509
200 feet for 30 MPH
0
(Minor Street)
3. Roadway Characteristics
from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs,
D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower.
4. Visibility
C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%)
A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles
396
4 3 16 19 12 13 18 13
403
Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered)
B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away
The intersection sight distance is less than:
150 feet for 25 MPH
split, and
Ped Volume
(All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied)
2. Collision History Satisfied
Satisfied
Item No. 3
1
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager
DATE: October 26, 2023
SUBJECT: Complete Streets Policy
PREPARED BY: Katie Garcia, Planning Technician
RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report.
BACKGROUND: Complete Streets is a transportation policy and design approach aimed at
creating roadways that accommodate and prioritize the needs of all users. Comple te Streets are
thoughtfully planned, designed, and built to accommodate people of all ages and abilities safely
and comfortably, including pedestrians, cyclists, equestrians, transit users, motorists, as well as
freight and service operators. This Complete Streets Policy sets forth an agency’s commitment to
and implementation process for integrating Complete Streets concepts in transportation planning
decisions and roadway design.
In advance of the City of Temecula’s General Plan Update, the City is complying with Assembly
Bill (AB) 1358, the “California Complete Streets Act.” AB 1358 requires cities and counties in
California to consider the needs of all road users (including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders,
and motorists) in the planning and design of transportation projects that receive state or federal
funding.
The Complete Streets Policy builds on the City’s current initiatives to improve multimodal safety
and access. The Temecula Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update, adopted in 2016,
was driven by the community’s desire to develop a comprehensive on-street and off-street bicycle
and trail network. The City’s Quality of Life Master Plan (2022) states that the City’s
transportation-related goals are to coordinate land uses to promote a range of mobility options and
draft a Complete Streets Policy. An update to the Urban Forest Management Plan was adopted in
2022, setting an ambitious goal to increase citywide tree canopy coverage by 20% over the next
40 years to mitigate the community’s greatest climate and health risks. The City also prepared a
Local Road Safety Plan (2022), which identifies infrastructure-oriented safety countermeasures to
prioritize within the City.
By adopting a Complete Streets policy, the City of Temecula is committing to develop a
comprehensive transportation system that facilitates safe access, mobility, economic growth,
appealing public spaces, health, and overall well-being for all members of the community. The
City’s Complete Streets Policy shifts the focus of transportation planning and project development
2
from vehicle movement as the primary goal to the safe movement of people and goods. The Policy
acknowledges streets can have varying roles, functions, and levels of activity depending on the
context of the surrounding land use and community.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Complete Streets Policy Document
Subject: Complete Streets Policy
Policy Number: TBD
Issue Date: N/A
Effective Date: N/A Revised Date: N/A
______________________________________________________________________________
BACKGROUND
Complete Streets is a transportation policy and design approach aimed at creating roadways that
accommodate and prioritize the needs of all users. Complete Streets are thoughtfully planned, designed,
and built to accommodate people of all ages and abilities safely and comfortably , including pedestrians,
cyclists, equestrians, transit users, motorists, as well as freight and service operators. This Complete
Streets Policy sets forth an agency’s commitment to and implementation process for integrating Complete
Streets concepts in transportation planning decisions and roadway design.
In advance of the City of Temecula’s General Plan Update, the City is complying with Assembly Bill (AB)
1358, the “California Complete Streets Act.” AB 1358 requires cities and counties in California to consider
the needs of all road users (including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists) in the planning
and design of transportation projects that receive state or federal funding.
This Complete Streets Policy builds on past and current initiatives to improve multimodal safety and access
in Temecula. Temecula’s Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), adopted in 2022, recognizes transportation
mobility and connectivity as a core value of the City and specifically lists development of a Complete Streets
Policy as a key goal for 2040. Driven by the community’s desire to develop a comprehensive on-street and
off-street bicycle and trail network, the City completed a comprehensive update of its Multi-Use Trails and
Bikeways Master Plan in 2016. The City also identified several infrastructure-oriented safety
countermeasures to prioritize through development of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) in 2022.
Additionally, the City completed an update of its Urban Forest Management Plan (2022), which set an
ambitious goal to increase citywide tree canopy coverage by 20% over the next 40 years to mitigate the
community’s greatest climate and health risks.
By adopting a Complete Streets policy, the City of Temecula commits to developing a comprehensive
transportation system that facilitates safe access, mobility, economic growth, appealing public spaces,
health, and overall well-being for all members of the community. The City’s Complete Streets Policy shifts
the focus of transportation planning and project development from vehicle movement as the primary goal
to the safe movement of people and goods. The Policy acknowledges streets can have varying roles,
functions, and levels of activity depending on the context of the surrounding land use and community.
VISION AND INTENT
The City of Temecula is committed to creating a comprehensive multimodal transportation system. Through
implementation of this Complete Streets Policy, the City will consistently plan, design, construct, and
maintain all transportation facilities within the public right-of-way so that are safe, reliable, efficient,
convenient, and connected for all transportation modes.
This Policy directs City decision-makers to consider all transportation system users when making decisions
regarding transportation and land use planning. The City shall work to advance Complete Streets to the
greatest extent possible, with a focus on ensuring safe access for people of all ages and abilities.
This Policy shall gradually help reduce the dependence of the automobile from being the only reliable
source of travel to a transportation network that supports all modes of transp ortation, benefiting residents
and visitors alike. This approach involves investing in transportation infrastructure that not only supports
walking, biking, and public transportation, but also anticipates future transportation trends and facilities,
including vehicle ride hailing (such as Uber or Lyft), carpooling, and potentially autonomous transportation
options.
The following guiding principles will be considered to implement Complete Streets in the City:
GOALS
1. Serve all users and modes. Develop a transportation network that is context-sensitive and
prioritizes safety, comfort, accessibility, and convenience for people of all ages and abilities within
the roadway context.
2. Increase transportation and mobility options. Incorporate considerations for walking, biking,
public transit, and other alternative transportation modes into all planning and construction
endeavors.
3. Establish a connected multimodal transportation network . Expand and enhance the existing
transportation network by completing missing links with appropriately sized streets. Project designs
should proactively identify and rectify modal gaps or shortcomings, striving to strike a harmonious
balance where all modes are served.
4. Coordinate land use and transportation. Create a balanced, modern, and integrated
transportation system that is capable of serving current and future travel demand.
5. Preserve community character and health. Establish a transportation system that reduces
automobile dependency, improving community health and overall quality of life, while maintaining
the unique qualities and assets that make Temecula a desirable place to live.
APPLICABILITY
Except as otherwise stated below, this Policy applies to all roadway project phases undertaken by or under
the authority of or subject to the supervision of the City of Temecula, for the improvement of any street and
public right-of-way (ROW), including planning, programming, design, acquisition of land, construction,
construction engineering, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurf acing, retrofit and operation. Accommodation
for all modes of transportation to safely use the roadway shall be provided during construction or repair
work.
In the case where a project is within or connects to a City ROW and/or is owned by another entity, City staff
shall work with the ROW/easement owner, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Riverside
County, and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as may be appropriate, to the
greatest extent possible, to advance Complete Streets designs. In addition, this Policy requires City staff to
evaluate new development and redevelopment projects and require s connected pedestrian and bicycle
access within the development and connecting to and from the surrounding transportation system for
approval.
The City will approach every planned project as an opportunity to create a safer and more accessible
transportation system for all users.
EXCEPTIONS
There are specific circumstances in which it may not be appropriate to provide bicycle, pedestrian, and/or
transit facilities. These exceptions include:
a. LIMITED-ACCESS ROADWAYS
This Policy does not apply to corridors where specific users are prohibited by law (e.g.,
interstate freeway, pedestrian mall). Exclusion of certain users on particular corridors should
not exempt projects from accommodating other permitted users.
b. ORDINARY MAINTENANCE
This Policy does not apply to routine maintenance such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping,
pothole filling, spot repair, concrete joint repair, or other regular or seasonal maintenance.
c. DISPROPORTIONATE COSTS
This Policy does not apply to projects where the cost of integrating Complete Streets design
elements is excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use.
d. PRE-EXISTING PROJECTS
This Policy does not apply to projects where a reasonable and equivalent project along the
same corridor is already programmed to provide adequate Complete Streets design elements.
All exceptions shall be specific and approved by the City’s CIP Engineering Manager, Director of Public
Works, and Director of Community Development (as applicable).
LAND USE & CONTEXT SENSITIVITY
Complete Streets implementation should be sensitive to the unique characteristics of the City's physical,
economic, and social environment. The City will take a context-sensitive approach to process and design,
giving significant consideration to stakeholder and community values. The City will also consider the
surrounding community's current and expected land use and transportation needs . The City shall consider
new and revised land use policies, Specific Plan guidelines, and zoning ordinances to specify how
transportation projects will serve current and future land use needs. The intent is to establish a
comprehensive multimodal transportation system that is coordinated closely with the Circulation Element
of the City’s General Plan and capable of serving future growth in the City. The City is dedicated to reducing
congestion, increasing access for all modes, and encouraging mixed use development at activity nodes
throughout the city. The City will work to preserve the desirable characteristics of quiet, calm, safe, family-
oriented neighborhoods, while also taking into account the connectivity of the transportation system as a
whole for all modes and users.
CALIFORNIA POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
Active transportation has been increasingly recognized as a viable opportunity to reduce vehicle miles
traveled (VMT), thereby reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, improving public health, reducing
transportation costs, and improving the economic climate. Diminished driving levels and increased
preference for walkable, bikeable, and transit-connected communities, particularly among millennials and
empty nesters, is well documented. The movement to make cycling, walking, and public transit feasible
transportation options is also supported by several recent pieces of California legislation, including :
Caltrans Director’s Policy 37 (DP-37)1
o This policy requires all new transportation projects funded or ove rseen by Caltrans to
provide comfortable, convenient, and connected Complete Streets facilities for people
walking, biking, and taking transit or passenger rail.
Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB 1358)
o This act requires all cities and counties in California to include Complete Streets policies
as part of any substantial revision to the Circulation Element of their General Plan.
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (A B 32) and Sustainable Communities and Climate
Protection Act of 2008 (Senate Bill 375)
o These acts outline California’s goals for reducing GHG emissions through integrated land
use and transportation planning.
COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN
Transportation projects and maintenance activities shall be:
Suitable and appropriate to the function and context of the transportation facility.
Sensitive to neighborhood context and cognizant of neighborhood needs.
Flexible in project design to ensure that all users have safe access and use .
Considered a component of a comprehensive, integrated, and interconnect ed transportation
network that allows all users to choose between different modes of travel .
Consistent and compatible with the City of Temecula’s Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan,
General Plan, Quality of Life Master Plan, Local Road Safety Plan, Urban Forest Management
Plan, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self Evaluation and Transition Plan, Communications
Master Plan, and any relevant Specific Plans.
Facilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with current applicable laws a nd regulations,
using best practices and guidance from a variety of organizations, as long as they do not conflict with the
principles outlined in this Complete Streets Policy.
Best practices may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Caltrans Complete Streets Elements Toolbox
1 https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/esta/documents/dp-37-complete-streets-a11y.pdf
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ’ (AASHTO) Guide for the
Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrians Facilities
AASHTO’s Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities
Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Achieving Multimodal Networks: Applying Design
Flexibility and Reducing Conflicts
FHWA’s Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide
FHWA’s Incorporating On-Road Bicycle Networks into Resurfacing Projects Report
Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context
Sensitive Approach
National Association of City Transportation Officials’ (NACTO) Urban Street Design Guide
NACTO’s Transit Street Design Guide
NACTO’s Urban Bikeway Design Guide
NACTO’s Urban Street Stormwater Guide
U.S. Access Board’s Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program’s (NCHRP) Multimodal Level of Service Analysis
for Urban Streets Report
Design standards required for state or federally funded projects will supersede local requirements if there
is an actual conflict between the local and state or federal standards and if funding will be impacted by
adherence to the local standards.
Design standards include, but are not limited to, the following:
U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) ADA Standards for Accessible Design
AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (Green Book)
Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual (HDM)
Caltrans’ Plans Preparation Manual (PPM)
Caltrans’ California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)
FHWA’s Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS
Complete Streets implementation will require ongoing cooperation and collaboration among a diverse array
of stakeholders. The City will take the following steps to facilitate the process:
The City shall integrate Complete Streets principles and design guidelines into all City plans,
policies, processes, manuals, ordinances, and programs. This includes updating the City’s General
Plan and Street Design Manual to align with the principles of this Policy.
The City shall develop a layered network concept as part of the Circulation Element in the General
Plan Update to identify the priority mode(s) (Transit, Pedestrian, Bicycle, Auto, or Goods
Movement) for each corridor depending on the context of the adjacent land use. This approach
reduces potential conflict inherent in trying to design all roadways for all uses. By overlaying various
modal layers, a logical and more comfortable multimodal network is created.
The City shall develop an internal decision-making process to ensure that transportation
infrastructure projects (new facilities, upgraded facilities, and maintenance projects) are
implementing Complete Streets where practical by considering the feasibility of Complete Streets
improvements and ensuring consistency with other planning documents the City has adopted.
The City shall review, revise, and/or recommend changes to all policies, procedures, and design
standards associated with site plans and other requirements for public and private development to
ensure best practices are utilized to support Complete Streets.
The City shall promote collaboration and coordination between City departments, including
Planning, Traffic, CIP, Land Development, and Fire, and with other transportation and planning
agencies.
The City shall develop new design policies and guidelines or revise existing ones to reflect the
current state of best practices in transportation design. The City may also consider adopting
national, state, or SCAG’s local design guidance.
The City shall continue to identify local, state, and federal funds to implement Complete Streets
projects to supplement Temecula’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This will require a
continued partnership and coordination with SCAG, Caltrans, and Riverside County. Local funding
opportunities include, but are not limited to, the following:
o Proactively incorporating and bundling multimodal improvements with maintenance
projects, capital improvement projects, ROW construction, and other local and regional
transportation projects to transition the existing ROW to a more complete corridor.
o Considering lower-cost, high-benefit, quick-build engineering treatments for near-term
traffic safety improvements.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Complete Streets implementation will be a process that requires regular evaluation to assess progress and
effectiveness. The City’s Planning and Traffic Departments will be responsible for annual tracking and
reporting performance measures. The performance measures that will be evaluated include, but are not
limited to, the following:
Miles of bicycle lanes, routes, and trails installed/dedicated by width and type
Number of bicycle parking facilities installed
Number of traffic calming facilities installed
Linear feet of pedestrian accommodations installed or repaired
Number of crosswalks installed or improved
Number of missing or noncompliant curb ramps
Number of ADA accommodations installed
Number of transit accessibility improvements installed
Transit ridership
Percent of City lane miles that meet or exceed Pavement Condition Index (PCI) standard of 70
Number of new trees planted
Number of exceptions approved
Citywide average Walk Score rating
Bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and traffic counts
Bicycle and pedestrian crash data involving serious injuries or fatalities
Total dollar amount spent on Complete Streets projects or portions of projects
Item No. 4
1
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 2023
SUBJECT Electric Bicycles Feedback
PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Management Assistant
Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission provide feedback for future
consideration by Commission and City Council.
BACKGROUND: Electric bicycles, more commonly referred to as E-bikes, are
increasingly becoming a more popular mode of transportation. An E-bike boosts a cyclist’s ability
with the help of an electric motor. There are many different shapes, sizes and types with speeds
ranging from 20 to 28 miles per hour (MPH).
In October of 2015, Assembly Bill No. 1096 (AB 1096) was approved by the Governor and filed
with the Secretary of State. This bill would define the term “electric bicycle”, provide stipulations
for certain classes of electric bicycles and describe requirements relating to the operation of
bicycles. Before AB 1096 was enacted E-bikes were regulated similar to mopeds, with access only
allowed on public streets and roads. The new assembly bill granted riders access to additional
California bikeways if the local jurisdiction permits it.
With E-bikes increasing in popularity, the City would like Commission feedback on E-bikes as
local jurisdictions will be responsible for implementing and enforcing policies. Attached to this
report are various E-bike literature references which include Temecula’s existing Municipal code
for bicycles on sidewalks, Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) letter to parents,
California E-bike laws summary, and various municipal agency municipal code examples.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Temecula Municipal Code for Bicycles on Sidewalks
2. TVUSD E-bikes Letter
3. California E-bike Law Summary
4. Carlsbad E-bike Policy
5. Lake Forest E-bike Policy
6. Solana Beach E-bike Policy
Temecula, California Municipal Code
Title 10 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
Chapter 10.24 DRIVING RULES
10.24.040 Bicycles on sidewalks—When allowed.
A. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10.24.030, bicycles may be ridden on sidewalks except as follows:
1. No person shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk within any business district; upon the sidewalks of bridges; in pedestrian
underpasses; on pedestrian overpasses; or upon sidewalks adjacent to any school building.
2. No person shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk in an area where riding a bicycle or unicycle is prohibited by ordinance of the city
council and appropriate signage is posted advising of the prohibition.
B. Any person riding a bicycle upon a sidewalk shall ride in the direction of travel in a safe manner with due care and caution, yield
the right-of-way to any pedestrian, and when overtaking and passing a pedestrian, shall give an audible signal and shall pass to the left of
the pedestrian only under conditions permitting such movement in safety. Any person riding a bicycle, upon entering a roadway or driveway
from a sidewalk, shall yield to all traffic.
C. As used in this section the following words are defined as follows:
1. “Bicycle” means a device upon which any person may ride, propelled exclusively by human power through a belt, chain, or gears,
and having one or more wheels, including, but not limited to, a bicycle, electric bicycle, unicycle, skateboard, roller skates, or other wheeled
toys.
2. “Sidewalk” means that portion of city right-of-way designated or used for pedestrian travel, including, but not limited to, sidewalks
and portions of sidewalks. (Ord. 20-07 § 1; Ord. 91-16 § 2 (12.08.455))
Contact:
City Clerk: 951-694-6444
Published by Quality Code Publishing, Seattle, WA. By using this site, you agree to the terms of use.
31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, CA 92592 | 951.676.2661 | www.tvusd.k12.ca.us
Subject: Important Information Regarding E-Bike Safety and Regulations
Dear TVUSD Parents,
We would like to bring to your attention a matter of utmost importance regarding the recent
uptick in e-bike accidents among our students. Ensuring the safety of our students is our top
priority, and we believe that awareness and understanding of the laws pertaining to e-bikes
can play a crucial role in safeguarding their well-being.
In the following pages, you will find a comprehensive guide that explains the differences in e-
bikes and the specific laws that apply to each type. We strongly encourage you to review this
document with your child to ensure they have a clear understanding of the rules and
regulations related to e-bikes.
In addition to providing this educational resource, we would like to inform you that our School
Resource Deputies from the Riverside Sheriff's Department will be actively enforcing the
vehicle code in the coming weeks. This enforcement aims to promote safer e-bike usage and
ensure that all students are in compliance with the relevant laws.
It is essential for both parents and students to be aware of the potential risks associated with
e-bikes and to take responsibility for adhering to the law. Understanding the rules not only
keeps our students safe but also helps prevent citations for violations of the vehicle code.
We kindly request that you take the time to go through the attached guide with your child
and emphasize the importance of responsible e-bike usage. By doing so, we can collectively
work towards creating a safer environment for our students as they navigate their daily
routines.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding e-bike regulations or safety, please do not
hesitate to reach out to us. Your feedback and involvement are invaluable as we strive to
promote the well-being of our students.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, and for your continued support in keeping our
school community safe.
Sincerely,
Jason Vickery
Director, Safety & Security
Kimberly Velez, Ed.D.
Allison Barclay
Danny Gonzalez
Dr. Joseph Komrosky
Steven Schwartz
Jennifer Wiersma
Board of Education
Interim Superintendent
31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, CA 92592 | 951.676.2661 | www.tvusd.k12.ca.us
EBIKE CLASS & VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS
CLASS 1 or 2 E-BIKE
PEDAL OPERATED OR THROTTLE - 20 MPH max
assisted speed
NO LICENSE PLATE REQUIRED
NO MINIMUM AGE
NO DRIVER’S LICENSE REQUIRED
HELMET REQUIRED FOR RIDERS UNDER 18 YEARS
ALLOWED WHERE REGULAR BIKES ARE, UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED
21202(a) - Right half of the roadway
21203 - Hitching rides on vehicles
21205 - Carrying articles, not holding
handlebars
21211(b) - Impede/Block others on bicycle
trail/path
21212(a) - Under 18 MUST wear a helmet
21456.2(a) - Failure to obey traffic control signs
21650.1 - Travel in the same direction of vehicles
(on the roadway)
22110(a)/(b)/(c) - Failure to use hand and arm
signals
TMC - 10.24.040 - Bicycles on sidewalks
adjacent to schools
COMMON VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS EQUIPMENT
21201(a) - Wheel brake required
21201(b) - Handlebar height no higher than
shoulders
21201(c) - Operator able to reach ground
21201(d)(1-4) - Lights/reflectors during darkness
21204(a) - Must have a permanent seat
attached
24016(d) - Modify tamper to increase speed
ANY E-bike that exceeds over 28 MPH is NOT street-legal
31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, CA 92592 | 951.676.2661 | www.tvusd.k12.ca.us
CLASS 3 E-BIKE
PEDAL OPERATED - 28 MPH ASSISTED MAX
SPEED
NO LICENSE PLATE REQUIRED
16 YEARS MINIMUM AGE
NO DRIVER’S LICENSE REQUIRED
BICYCLE HELMET REQUIRED FOR ALL RIDERS
NOT ALLOWED ON TRAILS OR CLASS 1 & 2 BIKE
PATHS
COMMON VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS EQUIPMENT
21201(a) - Wheel brake required
21201(b) - Handlebar height no higher
than shoulders
21201(c) - Operator able to reach ground
21201(d)(1-4) - Lights/reflectors during
darkness
21204(a) - Must have a permanent seat
attached
21201(C) - Operator able to reach ground
21202(a) - Right half of the roadway
21203 - Hitching rides on vehicles
21205 - Carrying articles, not holding
handlebars
21207.5 - Riding on bicycle trail/path/lane,
hiking/equestrian/recreation trail
21211(b) - Impede/block others on bicycle
trail/path
21213(a) - Under 16 years old operating
21213(b) - No helmet (any age)
21456.2(a) - Failure to obey traffic control signs
21650.1 - Travel the same direction as vehicles
(on roadway)
22110(a)/(b)/(c) - Failure to use hand and arm
signals
TMC - 10.24.040 - Bicycles on sidewalks
adjacent to schools
ANY E-bike that exceeds over 28 MPH is NOT street-legal
31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, CA 92592 | 951.676.2661 | www.tvusd.k12.ca.us
MOTORIZED BICYCLE
PEDALS OPTIONAL - THROTTLE 30 MPH MAX
SPEED
LICENSE PLATE REQUIRED
16 YEARS MINIMUM AGE
M1 DRIVER’ LICENSE REQUIRED
DOT HELMET REQUIRED
COMMON VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS EQUIPMENT
5030 - Special license plate required
5037(a) - License plate attached
5200(b) - Rear plate required
24600(a) - Tail lamp required
24603(a) - Brake light required
24607(a) - Rear red reflector required
25650.5 - Lighted headlamp as engine
runs
26311(a) - Brakes required for both wheels
26709(a) - One rearview mirror required
27000(a) - Horn required
4000(a)(1) - Registration required
16028(a) - Proof of insurance
14601.1(a) - Suspended driver (M)
12500(a) - Unlicensed driver (M)
12500(b) - M1 or M2 Endorsement required (M)
23127 - Unauthorized vehicle on trail/path (M)
27465(b)(1) - Bald Tires
27803(b) - Driver DOT helmet required
27803(c) - Passenger DOT helmet required
TMC - 10.24.040 - Bicycles on sidewalks
adjacent to schools
ANY E-bike that exceeds over 28 MPH is NOT street-legal
31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, CA 92592 | 951.676.2661 | www.tvusd.k12.ca.us
ELECTRIC SCOOTER
15 MPH MAX SPEED
16 YEARS OLD MINIMUM AGE
DRIVER’S LICENSE OR LEARNERS PERMIT
REQUIRED
HELMET REQUIRED UNDER AGE OF 18
NOT ALLOWED ON SIDEWALK
COMMON VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS EQUIPMENT
21235(a) - Must have mechanical brake
21223(a)(1) - Front ight during darkness
visible
21223(a)(2) - Rear red reflector visible
21223(a)(3) - Side Reflector white or yellow
visible
21226(b) - Adequate muffler/prevent
excessive noise
21226(d) - Modified exhaust system
21228 - Must ride on right side of roadway
21229(a) - Must ride in bicycle lane
21229(b) - Unsafe movement out of bicycle lane
21235(b) - Shall NOT ride on HWY posted higher
than 25 unless in bicycle lane
21235(c) - Helmet required (under 18)
21235(d) - Must have valid DL or Instruction
permit
21235(e) - No passengers
21235(f) - Carrying load preventing at least one
hand on handlebar
21235(g) - Riding on sidewalk prohibited
21235(h) - Handlebars above shoulders on HWY
21235(i) - Leave on side blocking
sidewalk/pathway
21235(j) - Ride while attached to a vehicle
22411 - Shall not exceed 15 MPH (max speed)
ANY E-bike that exceeds over 28 MPH is NOT street-legal
31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, CA 92592 | 951.676.2661 | www.tvusd.k12.ca.us
Chapter 10.56
OPERATION OF REGULATED MOBILITY DEVICES
Sections:
10.56.010 Definitions.
10.56.020 Operation of regulated mobility device.
10.56.030 Enforcement.
10.56.040 Exemptions.
10.56.050 Severability.
10.56.010 Definitions.
“Bicycle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 231, as it may be
amended from time to time.
“Electric bicycle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 312.5, as it may be
amended from time to time.
“Electric personal assistive mobility device” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code
Section 313, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Electrically motorized boards” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section
313.5, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Low speed vehicle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 385.5 , as it
may be amended from time to time.
“Motorized scooter” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 407.5, as it
may be amended from time to time.
“Operator” means a person who owns, operates, and/or controls a regulated mobility device.
“Public area” means any outdoor area that is open to the members of the public for public use,
whether owned or operated by the city or a private party.
“Regulated mobility device” means bicycles, electric bicycles, electric personal assistive mobility
devices, electrically motorized boards, low-speed vehicles, motorized scooters, shared mobility
devices, or other similar vehicles.
“Rider” means a traveler riding in or on a regulated mobility device who is not operating it.
“Shared mobility device” has the same meaning as in California Civil Code Section 2505, as it
may be amended from time to time.
“Vehicle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 670, as it may be
amended from time to time.
10.56.020 Operation of regulated mobility devices.
A. Prohibition of regulated mobility devices where posted.
It is prohibited to operate or ride on a regulated mobility device in public areas where
such prohibition is posted by signs or as otherwise set forth in this ordinance. A list of
public locations where regulated mobility devices are prohibited shall be on file in the
city clerk’s office. The list may be amended from time to time by resolution of the city
council.
B. No operating or riding on sidewalks and public facilities.
No person shall operate or ride a regulated mobility device upon any sidewalk, in any
public drainage facility, culvert, ditch, channel, or any other public athletic/sports court,
or gymnasium in the city.
C. Duty to operate with due care, reduce speed.
1. The operator of a regulated mobility device shall exercise all due care and shall
reduce the speed of the device, obey all traffic control devices, and take all other
action relating to operation of the device as necessary to safeguard the safety of
the operator, passengers, and any persons or other vehicles or devices in the
immediate area. It shall also be unlawful to transport any other person upon the
bar, handle bars, floorboard or other area of regulated mobility device not
designed for passenger riding or designed for a single person, or cling to or
attach oneself or one’s regulated mobility device with an operator or rider on
board to any moving vehicle or motorized or non -motorized wheeled device.
2. Persons operating or riding a regulated mobility device on a city trail must
dismount the regulated mobility device where the trail width is less than 5 feet
and a pedestrian or equine is within a distance of 50 feet from the regulated
mobility device.
10.56.030 Enforcement.
In lieu of a fine or administrative citation as authorized by this code, and in lieu of filing charges
in any court having jurisdiction over a violation, the police chief or designee may allow a
violator of this chapter to complete a police department provided safety course for regulated
mobility devices.
10.56.040 Exemptions.
A. Public agency personnel.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, or any other section of this code,
city and public agency personnel may operate regulated mobility devices or other
vehicles at any place in the city in the performance of their official duties.
B. Disability.
This chapter is not intended to apply to or otherwise restrict regulated mobility devices
used in a safe manner by physically disabled persons as defined under the Am ericans
with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq.).
10.56.050 Severability.
If any portion of this chapter, or its application to particular persons or circumstances, is held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, the
decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter or the application
of the chapter to persons or circumstances not similarly situated.
(949) 461-3400
(949) 461-3400 Calendar/ EventsNewsContact
Electric bicycles, more commonly referred to as E-bikes, are growing in popularity because
they allow people of many ages and abilities to get out and enjoy the fun and enjoyment of
cycling with assistance from an electric motor. Just like a traditional bicycle, there are many
different styles of e-bikes, from cargo e-bikes to beach cruisers to mountain bikes, making them
useful and fun in many ways. E-bikes also provide a great alternative to getting into a car to
travel around town.
If you ride, or are considering riding an e-bike in and around Lake Forest please take the time to
learn what is and isn't allowed, what the applicable laws are, and follow guidelines and
recommendations for the riding safety of yourself and others.
What is an Electric Bicycle?
An E-bike is an electric bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less
than 750 watts.
The same rules of the road that apply to traditional human-powered bicycles apply to all types
of electric bikes and human-powered bicycles.
Electric bicycles do not require registration, licensing or insurance like a car or motorcycle.
E-bike 101
California designates three classes of electric bicycles. Knowing the class of your E-bike will tell
you where and how you can ride.
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
Bikes with a top assisted
speed of 20 mph that must
be pedaled to operate.
Bikes with a top assisted speed of
20 mph that can be operated
without pedaling by using a
handlebar-mounted throttle.
Bikes with a top assisted
speed of 28 mph that must
be pedaled to operate.
P U B L I C S A F E T Y
Alert OC
Business Watch
Neighborhood Watch
Emergency Preparedness
Internet Safety
Know Before You Fly
Living With Urban Wildlife
CERT
Drowning Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention
Catalytic Converter Theft
Electric Bicycles
Home Departments Public Safety Electric Bicycles
E L E C T R I C B I C Y C L E S
Residents Business Community Departments Government
AGENDAS
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
Rider Requirements
No minimum age
Helmet required for
riders age 17 and under
Rider Requirements
No minimum age
Helmet required for riders age 17
and under
Rider Requirements
Minimum age 16
Helmet required for all
ages
Where to Ride?
Allowed wherever
regular bicycle are
permitted
Where to Ride?
Allowed wherever regular bicycle
are permitted
Where to Ride?
Allowed in bike lanes or
separated bikeways
adjacent to the roadway
NOT allowed on trails
It is against the law in California to modify or otherwise tamper with electric bicycles in a way that
changes the speed capability, unless the rider also changes the bicycle’s classification. Electric
bicycles with motors of more than 750 watts, and bicycles with gas motors are technically
motorcycles according to the law and require Class M licenses, registration, insurance, and meet
the minimum age requirement.
Electric Bicycle Feedback
Have you noticed unsafe e-bike riding behavior? If so, please call the Sheriff non emergency
number at (949) 770-6011. By providing information, you are helping your community become
educated on the issue.
Rules of the Road
All cyclists (e-bike riders included) are subject to all the same rules of the road as motorists.
Cyclists who don’t follow the rules are subject to ticketing and fines as defined by the California
Vehicle Code or Municipal Code.
Make sure to follow these guidelines:
Traffic lights, signs, and signals apply to all road users, including electric bicycle riders
Cyclists must ride to the right edge of the road as practical. If you're riding slower than traffic,
ride in the bike lane. You can leave the bike lane to turn left, pass someone, avoid a road
hazard or avoid cars turning right
Must stop at red lights and stop signs
Cyclists can ride no faster than 5 mph on City sidewalks
Cyclists must yield the right-of-way to any and all pedestrians on City sidewalks
Always yield the right-of-way to pedestrians on City trails
Must stop before a right turn at red lights
Riding against the flow of traffic is prohibited
When a bicycle lane is available, bicyclists are required to use the bike lane unless they are
traveling as fast as traffic
It is illegal to carry passengers on your electric bicycle unless your bike has an extra
permanent seat or when using a child safety seat
Weaving in and out of traffic is prohibited
Be aware of other road users, and try to match the average speed
Always wear a properly-fitted bicycle helmet with the chin strap securely fastened
The City of Lake Forest
100 Civic Center Dr.
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Phone:
(949) 461-3400
First Name*Last Name*
Email*
Newsletter
CAPTCHA
Monday through Thursday from 8 am to 6 pm
Friday from 8 am to 5 pm
Building & planning counters are closed from 11:45 am to
1 pm Monday - Friday & 1 pm to 6 pm Wednesdays
SUBMIT
Check the box to
complete captcha
challenge.
E l e c t r i c B i ke S a f e t y
HOME >COMMUNITY >PUBLIC SAFETY >ELECTRIC BIKE SAFETY
Electric bicycles (e-bikes) are more popular than ever and allow people of ma
assistance from an electric motor. There are many styles of e-bikes – from car
bikes – and the riding possibilities are endless.
As e-bike popularity continues to increase, education about e-bike safety is of
yourself and your children with the rules of the road, e-bike speci cs and safe
and e-bike accident-free!
W h a t q u a l i f i e s a s a n e -b i ke?
An e-bike is an electric bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an ele
The same rules of the road that apply to human-powered bicycles apply to
bicycles.
Electric bicycles do not need registration, licensing or insurance like a car o
V i r t u a l B i ke E d u c a t i o n C l a s s : A l l A b o u t E-B i k
You're invited! SANDAG hosts quarterly virtual bike education classes that are
next class—Tuesday, March 14 at noon—to learn all about e-bikes from indust
Coalition. E-bikes are growing in popularity, and they are great for completing
Topics include:
Tips on where to ride
How to ride legally and safely
Different classes of e-bikes and their speci c regulations
You can also download, share, and print the class yer here: All About E-Bikes
Click here to register for this course.
Thanks so much for your interest in learning about e-bikes and bike commut
class on Tuesday, thank you to everyone who attended.
If you were unable to attend or would like to share the class with colleagues o
found here on our YouTube page.
E-bike Classi cations
Rules of the Road
Passengers
Visibility
Safety
Snap shot of Fines Associated with Violations
California Vehicle Codes
More Information
CONTACT US
Solana Beach City Hall
635 S. Highway 101,
Solana Beach, CA 92075
STAY CONNECTED
E-Newsletter Signup
Facebook
Twitter
HELPFUL LINKS
Upcoming Events
Meetings
COMMUNITY
ABOUT SOLANA BEACH
CITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
CITY INITIATIVES
EVENTS CALENDAR
EXPLORE SOLANA BEACH
PUBLIC SAFETY
Electric Bike Safety
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
STAY CONNECTED
RECREATION ENROLLMENT
VISITOR CENTER
+
+
+
+
-
+
AAA-+
english
Search
858-720-2400
Monday - Thursday
7:30 am - 5:30 pm
Every Other Friday
8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Instagram Council Meetings & Public
Workshops
Job Opportunities
Website Disclaimer of
Liability
Item No. 5
1
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 2023
SUBJECT Median Modification on Rancho California Road between Yukon Road and
Margarita Road
PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Management Assistant
Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission approve the proposed median
modification on Rancho California Road between Yukon Road and Margarita Road.
BACKGROUND: In October of 2023, City staff received a request from a member of
the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department Temecula Traffic Team. The request was for an
extension of the median along Rancho California Road between Yukon Road and Margarita Road,
limiting the left turn movement from the Palomar Village Shopping Mall onto Rancho California
Road (Eastbound).
The Sheriff’s Department noted that within the last five years there have been 29 written traffic
collisions, 16 of which involved various injuries. These incidents involved drivers attempting to
make the left turn movement from the Palomar Village Shopping Mall onto Rancho California
Road (Eastbound) and being hit by traffic heading west on Rancho California Road. Issues with
visibility combined with the speed of traffic at this location have resulted in drivers having
difficulty being able to make the turn safely.
The Traffic Engineering Division evaluated the segment of Rancho California Road between
Yukon Road and Margarita Road and have determined the best option would be to extend the
existing median. This would limit drivers ability to make the left turn movement from the Palomar
Village Shopping Mall onto Rancho California Road (Eastbound) while still preserving the ability
to enter from Rancho California Road (Eastbound). Staff recommends commission approve the
proposed median modification on Rancho California Road between Yukon Road and Margarita
Road.
FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with median modification.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A – Proposed Median Modification
Item No. 6
1
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 2023
SUBJECT Reschedule Traffic Safety Commission Meetings of November and December
2023
PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Management Assistant
Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission direct Staff to cancel and
reschedule the regular meetings of November and December 2023, and perform the appropriate
posting and noticing requirements per the Government Code.
BACKGROUND: Due to the upcoming November and December Holiday Season, it
is recommended that the Commission consolidate the meetings of November 23, 2023 and
December 28, 2023 into one (1) Special meeting to be scheduled Thursday, December 7, 2023.
The public has been notified of the Traffic Safety Commission’s consideration of this issue through
the agenda notification process.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: None.
Item No. 7
California
Highway Patrol
Temecula Area
Report for September 2023
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Services Provided
•45 Child Safety Seats
• 3 Community Traffic Safety
Event
• 1 Teen Traffic Safety
Presentation
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC
Enforcement Activity
•Citations Issued – 845
•Total Enforcement Contacts –
1499
•Labor Day MEP 133 speeding, 3
over 100 MPH, 21 unsafe lane
change/unsafe turning, 3
distracted driver, 72 other PCF,
6 seatbelt, 16 verbal warning, 8
vehicles impounded, 10 DUI
arrests (238 citations total)
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Driving Under the
Influence
•Monthly Arrests – 51
•DUI crashes - 11
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC
BY-ND
Traffic Collisions
•Non-Injury – 77
•Injury – 65
•Fatal –2
•Fatal Year to Date – 21
•Total Collisions – 142
Fatal Traffic Collisions /
Major Investigations
•N/B I-15 s/of Franklin
•SR-74 w/of Cortrite
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Item No. 8
City of Temecula Traffic Report -September 2023
Southwest Sheriff Station
Citation Totals
Total Hazardous Citations 1112
Total Non-Hazardous Citations 263
Seatbelt Citations (Included)16
Cell phone Citations (Included)293
Parking Citations 163
Written Warnings Issued (Included)382
Total Citations Issued 1920
City Funded Targeted Enforcement
S.L.A.P. Citations (Included)94
Commercial Enforcement Citations (Included)17
Driving Under the Influence
D.U.I. Arrests 18
D.U.I. Arrests YTD 265
D.U.I. YTD Previous Year (2022)352
OTS/City Funded Special Operations
Targeted Traffic Enforcement Operations 2
July Aug Sep 3 Month Total
Citations Issued for Hazardous Citations (Moving Viol.)1052 1156 1112 3320
Non-Hazardous Citations 112 224 263 599
“Click It or Ticket” and/or Seatbelt Citations 17 21 16 54
Distracted Driver (Cell Phone Use)240 241 293 774
Parking Citations 224 156 163 543
Written Warnings Issued 329 431 382 1142
Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) Red Light 49 108 94 251
Commercial Enforcement Citations 21 32 17 70
Non-Injury Collisions 23 24 28 75
Injury Collisions 25 25 31 81
DUI Arrests 25 32 18 75
Item No. 9