Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09282023 TS Commission Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Carter FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Matics ROLL CALL: Ackerman, Carter, Matics, Richardson, Sullivan PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited . Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 1.Approve Action Minutes of July 27, 2023 That the Traffic Safety Commission approve the action minutes of July 27, 2023. Recommendation: Page 1 Traffic Safety Commission Agenda September 28, 2023 Action MinutesAttachments: BUSINESS Members of the public may address the Commission on Business items that appear on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 2.Coordinated Signal Timing Report for PW18-05 Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on coordinated signal timing for project PW18-05 Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade. Recommendation: Agenda Report Temecula Coordinated Signal Timing Report Coordination Summary Results Attachments: 3.Stop Controls and Pedestrian Analysis for Mercedes Street between 6th Street and 3rd Street That the Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersections of Mercedes Street /5th Street and Mercedes Street/4th Street. 2. Recommend staff implement striped pedestrian crosswalks at intersections of Mercedes Street/6th Street, Mercedes/5th Street, Mercedes/4th Street, and Merecedes/3rd Street pending City Council adoption of Multi-Way Stop Controls. Recommendation: Agenda Report Mercedes Crosswalk Exhibit Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis Accident Data Attachments: DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and File) 4.California Highway Patrol Report California Highway Patrol Report - August 2023Attachments: Page 2 Traffic Safety Commission Agenda September 28, 2023 5.Police Chief's Report Police Chief's Report - August 2023Attachments: 6.Traffic Engineer's Report Traffic Engineer's Report - August 2023Attachments: DIRECTOR REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Public Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, October 26, 2023, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Public Traffic Safety Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Public Works Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 3 Item No. 1 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 27, 2023 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairperson Carter FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Carter ROLL CALL: Ackerman (absent), Carter, Matics, Richardson (absent), Sullivan PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Louis Towd (Item #2) • Eric Mickillicen (Item #2) • Liselle D. (Item #2) • Greg Cole (Item #2) • Amy (Item #2) • Donna Cole (Item #2) • Madelyn (Item #2) • Ashley Arms (Item #2) • Kenzie Ellis (Item #2) • Stephen Benavides (Item #2) • Julie (Item #2) • Steve Sommers (Item #2) • Kev (Item #2) • Stacie Jalzuttis (Item #2) • Mark LeTourneau (Item #2) • Molly Howard (Item #2) • Yolanda Wagner (Item #2) • James Howard (Item #2) • Israel Gutierrez (Item #2) • Robert Chen (Item #2) CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approve Action Minutes of May 25, 2023 Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes of May 25, 2023. Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0; Ackerman and Richardson absent): Motion by Sullivan, Second by Matics. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Ackerman and Richardson absent. BUSINESS 2. Ynez Road/De Portola Road Traffic Calming Workshop Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Direct Staff to implement the near-term traffic calming measures on Ynez Road-De Portola Road. 2. Direct Staff to continue to study the long-term traffic calming measures on Ynez Road-De Portola Road. 2 Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0; Ackerman and Richardson absent): Motion by Sullivan, Second by Matics. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Ackerman and Richardson absent. DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and File) 4. Police Chief’s Report 5. Traffic Engineer’s Report DIRECTOR REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT At 7:57 PM, the Traffic Safety Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Thursday, August 24, 2023, at 6:00 PM, in the Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Robert Carter, Chairperson Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Item No. 2 1 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 28, 2023 SUBJECT Coordinated Signal Timing Report for PW18-05 Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade PREPARED BY: Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer Erick Escobedo, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on coordinated signal timing for project PW18-05 Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade. BACKGROUND: On December 2, 2015, the City was awarded HSIP Cycle 7 grant funding for the Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade Project (PW 18-05) in the amount of $1,208,200. The project recently completed construction and installation of fiber optic communication systems including conduits, cables, closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras, traffic signal controllers, and related communication equipment to improve safety and operations on the corridors of Winchester Road, Rancho California Road, and Temecula Parkway. The new system provides consistent, reliable, and modern communications and controls which enables proactive traffic signal management and response to real time traffic conditions. In addition to the fiber communication upgrades, the project developed and implemented coordinated signal timing along the corridors. Ultimately the goal of the project was to improve public safety, shorten commute times, reduce greenhouse gas emission, and increase mobility for all modes of travel. Coordinated signal timing was developed and implemented on the following corridors: Winchester Road from Diaz Road to Nicolas Road (11 traffic signals including 2 Caltrans) Rancho California Road from Business Park Drive to Butterfield Stage Road (17 traffic signals including 2 Caltrans) Temecula Parkway from Old Town Front St/I-15 SB ramps to Butterfield Stage Road (15 traffic signals including 3 Caltrans) A detailed analysis of the coordination implementation and results on Winchester Road, Rancho California Road, and Temecula Parkway can be seen in Attachment 1. Based on the results of the data detailed in the Coordinated Signal Timing Report, all goals of the project were achieved. Significant improvements were made for AM, Midday, and PM traffic operations along the corridors. A simplified summary of results achieved on each corridor is summarized in Attachment 2. 2 Staff recommends the Commission receive and file this coordinated signal timing report. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1 – Temecula Coordinated Signal Timing Report 2 – Coordination Summary Results City of Temecula Coordinated Signal Timing Report August 2023 Prepared for: City of Temecula 41000 Main St Temecula, CA 92590 Prepared by: STC Traffic 5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 218 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Coordinated Signal Timing Report i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROJECT AREA .............................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 VOLUME DATA ............................................................................................................................. 1 4.0 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING ............................................................................................................. 2 5.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................ 3 6.0 CORRIDOR SYNCHRONIZATION .................................................................................................... 4 6.1 SIGNAL TIMING PARAMETERS .............................................................................................................. 4 6.2 COORDINATION PLAN OPTIMIZATION ................................................................................................... 5 6.3 TOD SCHEDULE DETERMINATION ................................................................................................. 5 7.0 PERFORMANCE METRICS ............................................................................................................ 12 7.1 WINCHESTER ROAD PERFORMANCE MEASURE ...................................................................................... 12 7.2 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD PERFORMANCE MEASURE ........................................................................... 16 7.3 TEMECULA PARKWAY PERFORMANCE MEASURE .................................................................................... 21 8.0 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 25 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3‐1: Project Area Map ........................................................................................................................ 2 Figure 7‐1: Winchester Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Eastbound) .............................. 13 Figure 7‐2: Winchester Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Westbound) ............................ 13 Figure 7‐3: Winchester Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Eastbound) ......................... 14 Figure 7‐4: Winchester Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Westbound) ....................... 15 Figure 7‐5: Winchester Road Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Eastbound) ..................... 16 Figure 7‐6: Winchester Road Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Westbound) .................... 16 Figure 7‐7: Rancho California Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Eastbound) .................... 17 Figure 7‐8: Rancho California Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Westbound) .................. 18 Figure 7‐9: Rancho California Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Eastbound) ............... 19 Figure 7‐10: Rancho California Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Westbound) ........... 19 Figure 7‐11: Rancho California Road Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Eastbound) .......... 20 Figure 7‐12: Rancho California Road Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Westbound) ........ 21 Figure 7‐13: Temecula Parkway Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Eastbound) ......................... 22 Figure 7‐14: Temecula Parkway Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Westbound) ........................ 22 Figure 7‐15: Temecula Parkway Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Eastbound) .................... 23 Figure 7‐16: Temecula Parkway Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Westbound) .................. 23 Figure 7‐17: Temecula Parkway Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Eastbound) ................. 24 Coordinated Signal Timing Report ii Figure 7‐18: Temecula Parkway Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Westbound) ............... 24 LIST OF TABLES Table 2‐1 Project Area ................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 4‐1 Existing Coordination Plans ........................................................................................................... 3 Table 5‐1 Peak Travel Direction .................................................................................................................... 4 Table 6‐1 Optimized Coordination Plans ...................................................................................................... 6 Table 6‐2 Winchester Road Coordinated Operation Description ................................................................. 6 Table 6‐3 Rancho California Road Coordinated Operation Description ....................................................... 8 Table 6‐4 Temecula Parkway Coordinated Operation Description ............................................................ 10 Table 6‐5 Margarita Road Coordinated Operation Description ................................................................. 11 Table 7‐1 Winchester Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison ..................................................... 12 Table 7‐2 Winchester Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison ............................................... 14 Table 7‐3 Winchester Road Before and After Stop Comparison ................................................................ 15 Table 7‐4 Rancho California Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison ........................................... 17 Table 7‐5 Rancho California Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison ...................................... 18 Table 7‐6 Rancho California Road Before and After Stops Comparison ..................................................... 20 Table 7‐7 Temecula Parkway Before and After Travel Time Comparison .................................................. 21 Table 7‐8 Temecula Parkway Before and After Average Speed Comparison ............................................. 23 Table 7‐9 Temecula Parkway Before and After Stops Comparison ............................................................ 24 APPENDICES Appendix A: Volume Figures Appendix B: Tru‐Traffic Data Appendix C: Field Notes Coordinated Signal Timing Report 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of Temecula received funding from the Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 7 to upgrade the communication and traffic signal system on three primary arterials: Winchester Road, Rancho California Road, and Temecula Parkway. The new system provides consistent, reliable, and modern communications and control and enables proactive traffic signal management and response to real time traffic conditions. Ultimately the goal of the project is to improve public safety, shorten commute time, reduce greenhouse gas emission, and increase mobility for all modes of travel. The project included signal timing and coordination program development and optimization along the three corridors. The new signal timing and coordination were made possible and utilizes the newly implemented systems. The purpose of this report is to summarize the optimized signal timing and coordination plan development for the intersections along the three corridors and document the new programs system performance. 2.0 PROJECT AREA The project area consists of 46 traffic signals, which include seven Caltrans signals. The project area is summarized below in Table 2‐1 and shown geographically in Figure 2‐1 on the following page. Table 2‐1 Project Area Corridor Limits Number of Intersections Winchester Rd Diaz Rd to Nicholas Rd 11 (2 Caltrans signals) Rancho California Rd Business Park Dr to Butterfield Stage Rd 17 (2 Caltrans signals) Temecula Pkwy Old Town Front St ‐ I‐15 SB Ramp to Butterfield Stage Rd 15 (3 Caltrans signals) Margarita Rd Margarita Road & Rancho Vista Road Margarita Road & De Portola Rd Margarita Road & Dartolo Rd 3.0 VOLUME DATA Traffic volume data was provided by the City which was obtained from Streetlight Data application. Streetlight Data is a web‐based data service company which uses location records from smart phones and navigation devices, and processes them into intersection turning movement counts, Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes, travel trip origin‐destination, etc. The service has several years of historical data from which the user can aggregate data for a specific period. Coordinated Signal Timing Report 2 Figure 3‐1: Project Area Map The data was averaged for the months of March, April, September, and October. Monday through Thursday data was averaged for weekday volumes and Saturday and Sunday data was averaged for weekend volumes. The data was processed to calculate the weekday AM, Mid‐Day, PM, and weekend Mid‐Day peak period volumes and the peak hour factor (PHF). The weekday peak periods are 6:30 AM‐ 9:30 AM, 11:00 AM‐1:00 PM and 2:30 PM‐6:00 PM. The weekend peak period is 11:00 AM‐2:00 PM. Schematic diagrams of the peak hour volumes are included in Appendix A. 4.0 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING The existing corridor coordination plans, limits and intersections included and not included in the plan, peak period, and cycle length are summarized in Table 4‐1. The three intersections along Margarita Road are currently operating free (non‐coordinated). Coordinated Signal Timing Report 3 Table 4‐1 Existing Coordination Plans Corridor Time Period Cycle Length (sec) Limits /Intersections Free Operation (Non‐ coordinated) Intersections Winchester Rd AM 120 Diaz Rd to Roripaugh Rd Nicolas Rd MD 120 Diaz Rd to Roripaugh Rd Nicolas Rd PM 120 Enterprise Circle to Ynez Rd Diaz Rd and Nicolas Rd 130 Promenade Mall W to Roripaugh Rd WE MD 120 Jefferson Ave to Ynez Rd Remaining intersections Rancho California Rd AM 100 I‐15 SB Ramp to Ynez Rd and Asteroid Wy‐Yukon Rd to Margarita Rd Remaining intersections MD 100 I‐15 SB Ramp to Ynez Rd and Asteroid Wy‐Yukon Rd to Margarita Rd Remaining intersections PM 100 I‐15 SB Ramp and I‐15 NB Ramp Remaining intersections 120 Ynez Rd and Asteroid Wy‐Yukon Rd to Margarita Rd WE MD 100 I‐15 SB Ramp to Ynez Rd Remaining intersections Temecula Pkwy AM 100 Bedford Ct to Mahlon Vail Rd Butterfield Stage Rd MD 110 Bedford Ct Butterfield Stage Rd 100 La Paz Rd to Mahlon Vail Rd PM 110 Bedford Ct to Pachanga Pkwy Butterfield Stage Rd 120 Jedediah Smith Rd to Mahlon Vail Rd WE MD 100 Bedford Ct Mahlon Vail Rd and Butterfield Stage Rd 110 La Paz Rd to Meadows Parkway 5.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS The trip attracting land uses in the project area consist of industry, commercial, office and institution and are located along most parts of Winchester Rd and Temecula Pkwy and the areas near Interstate 15 (I‐ 15). Most trips to these land uses originate from outside the City and access the area through the interchanges on the three project corridors. Traffic from within the City also access I‐15 through these interchanges. In general traffic flow is dominant in the westbound direction in the morning and in the eastbound direction in the evening. Other times of day are more balanced. Based on the volume data, the generalized peak direction of travel on each corridor by peak period is summarized in Table 5‐1. Coordinated Signal Timing Report 4 Table 5‐1 Peak Travel Direction Corridor Time Period Peak Travel Direction Winchester Rd AM Westbound MD Both PM Eastbound WE MD Both Rancho California Road AM Westbound MD Both PM Both WE MD Both Temecula Pkwy AM Westbound MD Both PM Eastbound WE MD Both Margarita Rd AM Both MD Both PM Northbound WE MD Both 6.0 CORRIDOR SYNCHRONIZATION Corridor synchronization plans were developed through a stepwise process utilizing the data collection and existing conditions assessment. First, signal timing parameters were reviewed, and values determined to create uniform baseline operations for the project intersections. Next, traffic models were created and optimized based on data and analysis. The last step is defining the schedule and time periods of operation for each plan. Each of these steps and the results are further detailed in the following subsections. 6.1 SIGNAL TIMING PARAMETERS As part of this project, the following signal timing parameters were reviewed and determined based on California MUTCD guidelines and City practice: walk, flashing don’t walk, minimum green, vehicle extension, max gap, max limit, yellow change, and red clearance. These parameters were calibrated onto the model to reflect updated standard timing values. Additionally, a new timing parameter was implemented, an advanced walk interval, on all project pedestrian signal approaches. Assembly Bill AB‐2264 Pedestrian Crossing Signals, was introduced to amend Section 21450.5 of the Vehicle Code, relating to pedestrians, which requires all pedestrian signals Coordinated Signal Timing Report 5 to be programmed with a leading pedestrian interval (LPI) that advances the walk signal while the red signal halting vehicular traffic continues to be displayed on parallel through or turning movements. 6.2 COORDINATION PLAN OPTIMIZATION Synchro analysis software was used to develop optimized signal timing and coordination. A traffic model was created, and the updated base signal timing and lead pedestrian interval parameters were input. The cycle length along a corridor was determined based on the minimum cycle length required at the most constrained intersections with high pedestrian crossing times and traffic demand. Winchester Road/Ynez Road, Rancho California Road/Jefferson Avenue, and Temecula Parkway/Margarita Road are examples of constrained intersections. Movement splits at each intersection were set based on the traffic demand. The phase sequence (lead/lag) at intersections along was set to establish a wide green band along the corridor. Some side streets heavy left turn movements were lagged so that they arrive at the downstream signal at the end of red or begin of green interval and merge with the platoon along the corridor. Offsets were adjusted to provide progression along the corridor and generally favor the peak direction of travel. If traffic volumes in both directions are more balanced, offsets were adjusted to provide progression in both directions of travel. Multiple cycle length alternatives were tested at the ramp signals along the three corridors to determine the optimum cycle length and splits that would improve the intersection condition and queuing compared to the exiting condition. The optimal ramp cycle lengths were determined to be either 100‐ or 120‐seconds dependent on location and time of day. Corridor zones were established for the ramp signals and City signals near the ramps and adjacent groupings of signals. The Synchro files and ramp signal timing plans were submitted to – and reviewed and approved by Caltrans and the City. 6.3 TOD SCHEDULE DETERMINATION Coordination plan time of day schedules were determined through review of daily traffic volume data at select locations along the corridors. The following time ranges were set for the peak period coordination plans based on the traffic volumes and patterns. Weekday Plan 1 – AM Peak period: 06:30 – 10:00 Plan 2 – MID‐DAY Peak Period: 10:00 – 15:00 Plan 3 – PM Peak Period: 15:00 – 19:00 Weekend Plan 4 – 10:00 – 19:00 The optimized coordination timing plans schedules, cycles, and limits are summarized in Table 6‐1. Corridor traffic characteristics and detailed coordination plan operations are described in Table 6‐2 through Table 6‐5. Coordinated Signal Timing Report 6 Table 6‐1 Optimized Coordination Plans Corridor Time Period Cycle Length (sec) Free Operation (Non‐Coordinated) Intersections Winchester Rd All Time Periods 120 – Diaz Rd to NB Ramp None None 140 – Ynez Rd to Nicolas Rd None None Rancho California Rd AM 100 – Ramps Signals 150 – City Signals Business Park Dr, Tee Dr, Meadows Pkwy and Butter Stage Rd MD Business Park Dr, Tee Dr, Meadows Pkwy and Butter Stage Rd PM Business Park Dr, Tee Dr, Meadows Pkwy and Butter Stage Rd WE MD Business Park Dr, Diaz Rd, Tee Dr, Meadows Pkwy and Butter Stage Rd Temecula Pkwy AM 120 SB Ramp‐Old Town Front St MD 120 SB Ramp‐Old Town Front St PM 120‐NB Ramp to Pechanga Pkwy 140 – Jedediah Smith Rd to Butterfield Stage Rd SB Ramp‐Old Town Front St WE MD SB Ramp‐Old Town Front St Margarita Rd AM 120 None MD 120 None PM 140 None WE MD 140 None Table 6‐2 Winchester Road Coordinated Operation Description General For all time periods, due to change in cycle length between NB Ramp and Ynez Rd, traffic in either direction will experience progression variation. Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd are utilized as a bypass for NB freeway traffic from Temecula Pkwy and Rancho California Rd. AM Favors WB traffic. High volume SB left turn at Jefferson Ave and NB left turn at Ynez Rd were lagged so that traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. Narrow green band at Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, Margarita Rd, and Nicolas Rd due to high side street traffic. The WB platoon may arrive at the end of red interval at Ynez Rd and Jefferson Ave and may experience brief delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Enterprise Cir, Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, Margarita Rd and Roripaugh Rd, and may experience congestion and backup. Coordinated Signal Timing Report 7 EB and WB platoons may experience congestion and traffic backup at both Nicolas Rd and Roripaugh Rd due to high pedestrian volumes from the nearby high school. Review possible removal of one EB or WB pedestrian movement from both intersections. Mid Balanced plan, no favor in either direction. To provide a wide green band WB left turn lag at Margarita Rd and Ynez Rd and EB left turn lag at Margarita Meadows. High volume NB left turn at Ynez Rd and Nicolas Rd was lagged so that the traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. Narrow green band at Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd due to high side street traffic. The EB platoon may arrive at the end of the red interval at Jefferson Ave, Margarita Rd, and Nicolas Rd and may experience brief delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Enterprise Cir, Jefferson Ave, I‐15 NB Ramp, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd. The WB platoon may arrive at the end of the red interval at Enterprise Cir, Margarita Meadows, and Margarita Rd and may experience brief delay. At Ynez Rd, part of the WB platoon may arrive on red. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd. The NB and SB movements at Margarita Rd experience heavy volume due to neighboring school traffic, creating delays for EB and WB platoons. EB and WB platoons may experience congestion and traffic backup at both Nicolas Rd and Roripaugh Rd due to high pedestrian volumes from the nearby high school. Review possible removal of one EB or WB pedestrian movement from both intersections. Due to high volume, major parts of the corridor may experience congestion and traffic backup. PM Generally, favors the EB traffic, as the EB traffic is higher than the WB traffic. To provide a wide green band WB left turn lag at Jefferson Ave, Promenade Mall W and Margarita Rd and, EB left turn lag at Margarita Meadows and Nicolas Rd. NB left turn at Ynez Rd and Nicolas Rd lags so that the traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. Narrow green band at Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd. Heavy WB volume from Margarita Rd to the NB on‐ramp causes vehicle staging in the #3 lane. The EB platoon may arrive at the end of red interval at Jefferson Ave and Margarita Meadows and may experience brief delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, Margarita Meadows, Margarita Rd, and Nicolas Rd. At Nicolas Rd, part of the EB platoon may arrive on red. WB platoon may arrive on red at Ynez Rd, Margarita Meadows and Margarita Rd and may experience delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Ynez Rd and Margarita Rd. At Margarita Rd, the later part of the WB platoon may arrive on red. Due to high volume, major parts of the corridor may experience congestion and traffic backup. WE MID Coordinated Signal Timing Report 8 Balanced plan, no favor in either direction. To provide a wide green band, WB left turn lag at Jefferson Ave, Promenade Mall W and Margarita Rd and, EB left turn lag at Ynez Rd and Margarita Meadows. High volume NB left turn at Ynez Rd was lagged so that the traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. Narrow green band at Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd due to high side street traffic. Platoons in both EB and WB directions may arrive early (at end of red) and experience a brief delay at several intersections. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, both the EB and WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at intersections. Table 6‐3 Rancho California Road Coordinated Operation Description General Due to a different cycle length at the ramp signals, traffic may experience full corridor progression on alternate cycles. Side‐street delay is experienced for signals between Moraga Rd and Margarita Rd. AM Favors the WB traffic. SB left turn at Diaz Rd was lagged so that the traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. SB left turn at Jefferson Ave was lagged to minimize delay at the adjacent intersection. EB platoon may arrive on red at Lyndie Ln and Yukon Rd and experience delay. WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Ynez Rd, Moraga Rd and Margarita Rd and may experience congestion and traffic backup. The heavy SB left turn traffic from I‐15 SB Ramp may get progression at the downstream signals. Mid Balanced plan, no direction favored. To provide a wide green band, WB left turn lag at Diaz Rd, Jefferson Ave, and I‐15 SB Ramp. SB left turn at Diaz Rd, Jefferson Ave and Moraga Rd, and NB left turn at Margarita Rd was lagged so that the traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. Narrow green band at I‐15 SB Ramp, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd due to high side street traffic. EB platoon may arrive at the end of red interval at Lyndie Ln and Yukon Rd and may experience a brief delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at I‐15 SB Ramp and Margarita Rd. WB platoon may arrive at the end of red interval at Via Las Colinas and Town Center and may experience a brief delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Ynez Rd. PM Balanced plan, no direction favored. To provide wide green band, WB left turn lag at I‐15 SB Ramp, Ynez Rd, Lyndie Ln, and Moraga Rd and, EB left turn lag at Portofino, Humber Dr and Margarita Rd. Coordinated Signal Timing Report 9 SB left turn at Jefferson Ave and NB left turn at Ynez Rd and Margarita Rd was lagged so that the traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. SB left turn at Diaz Rd was lagged to minimize the delay at the adjacent intersection. Narrow green band at Jefferson Ave, I‐15SB Ramp, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd due to high side street traffic. The EB platoon may arrive at the end of red interval at Lindie Ln and Margarita Rd and may experience brief delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Diaz Rd, Jefferson Ave, I‐15 SB Ramp, I‐15 NB Ramp, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd. WB platoons may arrive at the end of red interval at multiple locations and may experience brief delay. The WB platoon may arrive at the start of the red interval at Diaz Rd and may experience long delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Ynez Rd, Moraga Rd, Yukon Rd, and Margarita Rd. Due to high volume major part of the corridor may experience congestion and traffic backup. WE MID Balanced plan, no direction favored. To provide wide green band, WB left turn lag at Jefferson Ave, I‐15 SB Ramp, Ynez Rd, and Moraga Rd and, EB left turn lag at Margarita Rd. SB left turn at Moraga Rd and, NB left turn at Ynez Rd and Margarita Rd was lagged so that the traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. Narrow green band at Jefferson Ave, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd due to high side street traffic. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at I‐15 SB Ramp, I‐15 NB Ramp, Ynez Rd, and Margarita Rd. WB platoon may arrive at the end of red interval at Lyndie Ln, Moraga Rd and Humber Dr and may experience brief delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Ynez Rd, Moraga Rd, Yukon Rd, and Margarita Rd. Major part of the corridor may experience congested condition and traffic backup. Coordinated Signal Timing Report 10 Table 6‐4 Temecula Parkway Coordinated Operation Description AM Balanced plan, no direction favored. To provide wide green band, WB left turn lag at Bedford Ct and Pechanga Pkwy and, EB left turn lag at Jedediah Smith Rd. NB left turn at Margarita Rd was lagged so that the traffic can arrive at the end of red or begin of green interval at the adjacent intersection. Narrow green band at Bedford Ct and Margarita Rd. The EB platoon may arrive at the end of red interval at Pechanga Pkwy and may experience brief delay. The EB platoon may arrive at middle of red interval at Meadows Pkwy and may experience long delay. At Rancho Puenlo Rd, the later part of the platoon may arrive on red. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Bedford Ct. At La Paz Rd, the back of the platoon may arrive on red. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Bedford Ct, La Paz Rd and Margarita Rd. Mid Balanced plan, no direction favored. To provide a wide green band, WB left turn lag at Jedediah Smith Rd and Margarita Rd. Narrow green band at Bedford Ct, Margarita Rd, and Butterfield Stage Rd. The EB platoon may arrive at the end of the red interval at Rancho Puenlo Rd and Margarita Rd and may experience brief delay. At Wabash Ln, the later part of the platoon may arrive on red. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Bedford Ct. The WB platoon may arrive at the end of the red interval at Rancho Community Wy and Country Glen Wy and experience brief delay. The WB platoon may arrive at the beginning of red at Margarita Rd and may experience long delay. At Bedford Ct later part of the WB platoon may arrive on red. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Bedford Ct and La Paz Rd. PM Generally, favors EB traffic. Due to the change in cycle length between Pechanga Pkwy and Jedediah Smith Rd, traffic in either direction may experience variation in progression, stop and delay within a multiple number of cycles. To provide a wide green band, WB left turn lag at Margarita Rd and, EB left turn lag at La Paz Rd. Narrow green band at Margarita Rd and Meadows Pkwy. The EB platoon may arrive at the end of the red interval at Pechanga Pkwy, Margarita Rd and Meadows Pkwy and may experience brief delay. Later part of the WB platoon may arrive on red at Wabash Ln. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at Bedford Ct, La Paz Rd, Pechanga Pkwy and Margarita Rd and, may experience congestion and traffic backup. The WB platoon may arrive at the end of the red interval at Rancho Community Wy, Country Glen Wy and Meadows Pkwy and may experience brief delay. The WB platoon may arrive at Coordinated Signal Timing Report 11 the start of red interval at Camino Del Sol and may experience long delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at La Paz Rd. WE MID Balanced plan, but generally favors WB traffic west of Pechanga Pkwy. Due to a change in cycle length between Pechanga Pkwy and Jedediah Smith Rd, traffic in either direction may experience variation in progression, stop and delay within a multiple number of cycles. To provide wide green band, WB left turn lag at Jedediah Smith Rd and Margarita Rd and, EB left turn lag at Meadows Pkwy. Narrow green band at Bedford Ct, Margarita Rd, Meadows Pkwy and Butterfield Stage Rd. The EB platoon may arrive at the end of the red interval at Rancho Puenlo Rd and may experience brief delay. The EB platoon may arrive at middle of red interval at Margarita Rd and Butterfield Stage Rd and may experience long delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the EB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at most intersections and may experience congestion and traffic backup. The WB platoon may arrive at the end of the red interval at Rancho Community Wy, Country Glen Wy and Meadows Pkwy and may experience brief delay. Due to high volume and/or narrow green band, the WB thru traffic may not clear within the same cycle at most intersections and may experience congestion and traffic backup. Later part of platoon for traffic in either direction may arrive on red at few locations. Table 6‐5 Margarita Road Coordinated Operation Description AM Favors NB traffic. NB platoon may arrive at end of red interval at De Portola Rd and may experience brief delay. SB platoon may arrive at middle of red interval at Temecula Pkwy. Mid Favors NB traffic. SB platoon may arrive at middle of red interval at Temecula Pkwy and may experience long delay. PM Favors NB traffic. SB platoon may arrive at start of red interval at Temecula Pkwy and may experience long delay. The corridor in both directions may experience congestion and traffic backup. WE MID Favors NB traffic. SB platoon may arrive at start of red interval at Temecula Pkwy and may experience long delay. The corridor in both directions may experience congestion and traffic backup. Coordinated Signal Timing Report 12 7.0 PERFORMANCE METRICS Travel time runs were performed before and after the signal timing implementation to evaluate the performance of the corridor with optimized traffic signal coordination timing. The travel time runs were performed by driving in a car along the corridor with a laptop running Tru‐Traffic software and connected with a GPS device. The travel time runs record live positioning, timing, speed, and number of stops. A minimum of five runs in each direction of travel were performed during the AM (7AM – 9AM), MID (11AM‐ 1PM) and PM (4PM‐6PM) peak periods. The before travel time runs were performed on Tuesday (November 15th, 2022), Wednesday (November 16th, 2022) and Thursday (November 17th, 2022), to establish the baseline operations before the implementation of the optimized signal timing. The after travel time runs were performed on Tuesday (July 27th, 2023), Wednesday (July 28th, 2023), and Thursday (July 29th, 2023) after the implementation of the optimized signal timing. The data was post‐processed and analyzed for travel time, average speed, and number of stops. An average of five runs was used for the analysis. Tru‐Traffic data is provided in Appendix B. Travel Time is the duration of time taken by a vehicle to travel from one end of the corridor to the other end. Travel time includes the running time between the intersections and the signal delay. Average Speed is the length of the corridor divided by the travel time. It factors in the speed of travel between the signals and deceleration traversing through the signal. Number of Stops is the average number of stops experienced by motorists traveling along the corridor. Stops are recorded when the vehicle is at a standstill position and when the speed drops below 5mph after exceeding 15mph. 7.1 WINCHESTER ROAD PERFORMANCE MEASURE Winchester Road travel time comparison is summarized in Table 7‐1, Figure 7‐1, and Figure 7‐2. Table 7‐1 Winchester Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison Travel Time (min) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 7.2 9.2 13.1 After 7.1 6.1 8.8 % Change ‐1% ‐33% ‐32% WB Direction Before 8.7 7.9 8.3 After 6.9 6.4 7.0 % Change ‐20% ‐19% ‐16% Coordinated Signal Timing Report 13 Figure 7‐1: Winchester Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Eastbound) Figure 7‐2: Winchester Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Westbound) ‐1%‐33%‐32% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB) Before After ‐20%‐19%‐16% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 14 Winchester Road average speed comparison is summarized in Table 7‐2, Figure 7‐3, and Figure 7‐4. Table 7‐2 Winchester Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison Average Speed (mph) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 19.1 11.8 11.1 After 19.8 21.7 17.3 % Change 4% 85% 56% WB Direction Before 16.9 13.7 13.0 After 20.1 21.9 19.7 % Change 19% 60% 52% Figure 7‐3: Winchester Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Eastbound) 4%85%56% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)Speed (EB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 15 Figure 7‐4: Winchester Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Westbound) The Winchester Road number of stops comparison is summarized in Table 7‐3, Figure 7‐5, and Figure 7‐ 6. Table 7‐3 Winchester Road Before and After Stop Comparison Stops (numbers) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 4.6 7.0 9.0 After 4.8 3.7 5.0 % Change 4% ‐48% ‐44% WB Direction Before 6.4 5.8 5.8 After 5.0 3.4 4.2 % Change ‐22% ‐41% ‐27% 19%60%52% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 16 Figure 7‐5: Winchester Road Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Eastbound) Figure 7‐6: Winchester Road Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Westbound) 7.2 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD PERFORMANCE MEASURE Rancho California Road travel time comparison is summarized in Table 7‐4, Figure 7‐7, and Figure 7‐8. 4%‐48%‐44% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (EB) Before After ‐22%‐41%‐27% ‐100% ‐50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 17 Table 7‐4 Rancho California Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison Travel Time (min) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 11.0 11.4 11.9 After 5.6 6.2 4.5 % Change ‐49% ‐45% ‐62% WB Direction Before 11.5 10.8 12.0 After 6.6 5.0 5.6 % Change ‐42% ‐53% ‐54% Figure 7‐7: Rancho California Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Eastbound) ‐49%‐45%‐62% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 18 Figure 7‐8: Rancho California Road Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Westbound) Rancho California Road average speed comparison is summarized in Table 7‐5, Figure 7‐9, and Figure 7‐ 10. Table 7‐5 Rancho California Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison Average Speed (mph) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 23.8 23.0 22.0 After 28.8 26.1 35.6 % Change 21% 14% 62% WB Direction Before 22.8 24.2 21.6 After 24.0 31.7 31.1 % Change 5% 31% 44% ‐42%‐53%‐54% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 19 Figure 7‐9: Rancho California Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Eastbound) Figure 7‐10: Rancho California Road Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Westbound) 21%14%62% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)Speed (EB) Before After 5%31%44% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 20 Rancho California Road number of stops comparison is summarized in Table 7‐6, Figure 7‐11, and Figure 7‐12. Table 7‐6 Rancho California Road Before and After Stops Comparison Stops (numbers) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 7.4 7.4 7.6 After 2.4 4.0 1.4 % Change ‐68% ‐46% ‐82% WB Direction Before 7.6 7.8 7.8 After 4.3 1.4 2.2 % Change ‐44% ‐82% ‐72% Figure 7‐11: Rancho California Road Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Eastbound) ‐49%‐45%‐62% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Stops (EB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 21 Figure 7‐12: Rancho California Road Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Westbound) 7.3 TEMECULA PARKWAY PERFORMANCE MEASURE Temecula Parkway travel time comparison is summarized in Table 7‐7, Figure 7‐13, and Figure 7‐14. Table 7‐7 Temecula Parkway Before and After Travel Time Comparison Travel Time (min) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 8.8 9.9 11.1 After 6.8 7.7 7.7 % Change ‐22% ‐22% ‐31% WB Direction Before 9.9 9.5 10.4 After 6.5 8.8 9.0 % Change ‐34% ‐7% ‐14% ‐44%‐82%‐72% ‐100% ‐50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 22 Figure 7‐13: Temecula Parkway Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Eastbound) Figure 7‐14: Temecula Parkway Before and After Travel Time Comparison (Westbound) ‐22%‐22%‐31% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB) Before After ‐34%‐7%‐14% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 23 The Temecula Pkwy average speed comparison is summarized in Table 7‐8, Figure 7‐15, and Figure 7‐16. Table 7‐8 Temecula Parkway Before and After Average Speed Comparison Average Speed (mph) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 27.3 24.1 21.8 After 34.7 29.5 29.1 % Change 27% 22% 33% WB Direction Before 24.1 25.2 23.0 After 36.6 27.1 27.7 % Change 52% 8% 21% Figure 7‐15: Temecula Parkway Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Eastbound) Figure 7‐16: Temecula Parkway Before and After Average Speed Comparison (Westbound) 27%22%33% ‐100% ‐80% ‐60% ‐40% ‐20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)Before After Speed (EB) 52%8%21% ‐100% ‐50% 0% 50% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 24 The Temecula Pkwy no. of stops comparison is summarized in Table 7‐9, Figure 7‐17, and Figure 7‐18. Table 7‐9 Temecula Parkway Before and After Stops Comparison Stops (numbers) AM MID PM EB Direction Before 5.0 7.0 7.6 After 3.6 3.0 2.8 % Change ‐28% ‐57% ‐63% WB Direction Before 8.2 4.6 6.4 After 2.5 4.2 4.4 % Change ‐70% ‐9% ‐31% Figure 7‐17: Temecula Parkway Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Eastbound) Figure 7‐18: Temecula Parkway Before and After Number of Stops Comparison (Westbound) ‐28%‐57%‐63% ‐100% ‐50% 0% 50% 100% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (EB) Before After ‐70%‐9%‐31% ‐100% ‐50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB) Before After Coordinated Signal Timing Report 25 8.0 SUMMARY Implementation of coordinated signal timing occurred on‐site over the course of three weeks on a typical Tuesday for each of the three corridors. Deficiencies in operation and general signal operation were noted and adjusted in the field during observation periods. The field notes were recorded and can be found in Appendix C: Field Notes. Coordinated operation performed as expected based upon time‐space diagrams and Synchro model analysis. The previous travel time measurement results show eastbound and westbound traffic performance metrics significantly improved compared to the pre‐project condition. Coordinated Signal Timing Report Appendix A: Volume Figures RCR AM 1 25nia Rd2270025Humber Dr 13 15101 Cosmic Dr 109 20 22715754Rancho California Rd7565017Asteroid Wy 49 44 21 Yukon Rd2612253 613008R ancho California R d79359246Margarita Rd 308 366 52Margarita Rd 96548117 11290223646028351146Tee Dr7248 28294164Meadow s P kwy 3 2 018321 Meadows Pkwy38436204 71529108090135Butterfield Stage Rd 1 0 217346Rancho California Rd3865251Butterfield Stage Rd57 89645 Rancho California RdRancho California RdRancho California RdRancho California RdRancho California RdRancho California RdRancho Californi a Rd-34-16+7-13-13+32-19+128-22+161-48 RCR AM 2 Rancho California Rd03310Business Park Dr57 4 0 Ridge Park Dr 0 6 14338174713Rancho California Rd3528615Diaz Rd 18739150 Vincent Moraga Dr 44 119 7610190020167 143 106 56378678001203338Jefferson Ave176222142 I-15 SB Ramp Rancho Cali fornia Rd5411576961208I-15 SB Ramp942391133 I-15 NB Ramp 36 515378 Rancho California Rd12672141564998I-15 NB Ramp Ynez Rd 8 1 042587 Rancho California Rd3677005401121419141Ynez Rd74287354 Hope Wy 5 023 Rancho California Rd12972532162598Town Center 5 9040 Via Las Colinas 4503 Rancho Cali forni a Rd446758633170017803 Rancho California Rd1425440Lyndie Ln95078 Lyndie Ln 00051700206Rancho California Rd1504754Moraga Rd17674393 Moraga Rd 10 26 34551525225 626258Portofino106 054 Rendezvous 75 0 502517258Rancho California Rd2270025Humber Dr 1315101 Cosmic Dr 109 20 22715754Rancho California Rd765017Rancho California Rd525Rancho California Rd975560Old Town Front StRancho California RdRancho California Rd+131-66+46-240+38-25-2-21-38-43-4-23+18-280-17-10-49+10-27-34-16+7-24+23 RCR MD 1 44113015Rancho California Rd43118872Humber Dr11 647 Cosmic Dr 75 6 8610718Rancho California Rd 133107544Asteroid Wy 29 6 14 Yukon Rd22 3125 1595220Ranc ho Cal ifornia Rd 97676313Margarita Rd 350 450 54Margarita Rd22749279 596271588597226746Tee Dr5147 57582217Meadows Pkwy 2 2 520725 Meadows Pkwy3612984 294252330261119Butterfield Stage Rd 7650293Rancho Calif ornia Rd5335250Butterfield Stage Rd3184759 Rancho Calif ornia RdRa nch o California Rd Rancho California RdRancho Califo rni a RdRancho California RdRancho California RdRancho Calif or nia Rd RCR MD 2 Rancho California Rd41692Business Park Dr16314 0 Ridge Park Dr 0 8 137176179243Rancho California Rd3640015Diaz Rd 4829738 Vincent Moraga Dr 26 73 10611245024115 315 325 172675163790625425Jefferson Ave325348153 I-15 SB Ramp Rancho Calif or nia Rd11961833521050I-15 SB Ramp 83132827 I-15 NB Ramp 2 8 515487 Rancho Calif orni a Rd16753751118817I-15 NB Ramp Ynez Rd 4 4 746384 Rancho Calif ornia Rd6741048491110991172Ynez Rd139558471 Hope Wy 2 234 Rancho Calif ornia Rd225102512103585Town Center 1 8 3085 Via Las Colinas 7 0012 Ran cho Califo rn ia Rd18112765141168152 508 Rancho Calif ornia Rd8410709Lyndie Ln75036 Lyndie Ln 2046111356Rancho California Rd1819558Moraga Rd27828226 Moraga Rd 6 17 4721941209 38125025Portofino14 023 Rendezvous 25 0 2544113015Rancho California Rd43118872Humber Dr11 647 Cosmic Dr 75 6 8610718Rancho California Rd133107544Asteroid Wy 29 6 14 Yukon Rd22 3125 1595220R ancho Ca lifornia Rd6313Rancho California Rd975Rancho California Rd600275Old Town Front StRancho California RdRancho California Rd RCR PM 1 Humber Dr11 10 1414152515Rancho Ca lifornia Rd245140057Asteroid Wy 50 11 17 Yukon Rd2616157 28140045Ranc ho California Rd 140973392Margarita Rd 696 1171 226Margarita Rd367707103 568342291478137801003Tee Dr6461 195937330Meadows Pkwy 4 3 071799 Meadows Pkwy6126980 4949639312236201Butterfield Stage Rd 7498743Rancho Calif ornia Rd8662317Butterfield Stage Rd5 6 56860 Rancho Calif or nia RdRan cho Cal iforni a RdRancho California RdRancho Calif orni a RdRancho California RdRancho California RdRancho Calif ornia Rd-53+77-160+62+52+49+77-77+125-348 RCR PM 2 Rancho California Rd439932Business Park Dr41051 8 Ridge Park Dr 2 6 21260224342Rancho California Rd9293551Diaz Rd 912417100 Vincent Moraga Dr 63 174 2371694252599 696 403 3031550221972556480Jefferson Ave463409120 I-15 SB Ramp Rancho Califo rn ia Rd21402763671033I-15 SB Ramp1155361082 I-15 NB Ramp 1 8 287793 Rancho Calif ornia Rd260069212601187I-15 NB Ramp Ynez Rd 7 7 0826121 Rancho Calif or nia Rd88716748411921136202Ynez Rd165742523 Hope Wy 2 444 Rancho Califo rn ia Rd2141589011400113Town Center 2 8 9097 Via Las Colinas 8 6020 Ran cho Califo rn ia Rd251564114391661202 5017 Rancho Calif or nia Rd15214755Lyndie Ln2570109 Lyndie Ln 307161541173Rancho California Rd331142513Moraga Rd38567385 Moraga Rd 10 49 75671305286 1381724100Portofino12 054 Rendezvous 50 0 2575152572Rancho California Rd911600119Humber Dr11 749 Cosmic Dr 82 10 1414152515Rancho California Rd245140057Asteroid Wy 50 11 17 Yukon Rd26 16157 28140045Rancho Cali forni a Rd 140973392Rancho California Rd2075Rancho California Rd600175Old Town Front StRancho California RdRancho California Rd+38+57+19-1-1070-42-3+18+9+9-157-250-179+67+23+30+30+29+77+16+49-53+77-160+62-90 RCR WE MD 1 Humber Dr11 4 68 8 91316759Rancho Ca lifornia Rd169182546Asteroid Wy 43 13 24 Yukon Rd1811168 23147338Ra ncho Cal ifor nia Rd 1311287393Margarita Rd 470 745 87Margarita Rd321760115 731071299162793611273Tee Dr6752 971281261Meadows Pkwy 3 3 332838 Meadows Pkwy65234116 578022990068180Butterfield Stage Rd 101152412Rancho Calif ornia Rd10176561Butterfield Stage Rd4 8 577 1 7 9 Rancho Cali forni a RdRa ncho Ca lifornia Rd Rancho California RdRancho Calif ornia RdRancho California RdRancho California RdRancho Calif ornia Rd+13+20-122-56+103+25+83-40+149-236 RCR WE MD 2 Rancho California Rd32000Business Park Dr64 6 3 Ridge Park Dr 0 2 141122478Rancho California Rd1723921Diaz Rd 35513139 Vincent Moraga Dr 17 68 1201622751579 352 470 1125251091246500369Jefferson Ave474484106 I-15 SB Ramp Ranc ho Calif orn ia Rd13692906521087I-15 SB Ramp1205551238 I-15 NB Ramp 2 9 623910 Rancho Calif or nia Rd218039414501175I-15 NB Ramp Ynez Rd 6 8 0897133 Rancho Calif or nia Rd75816106701741423249Ynez Rd 211789568 Hope Wy 6 81614 Ra ncho Calif or nia Rd215167510101500131Town Center 2 4 80 1 1 9 Via Las Colinas 3 0015 Rancho Calif ornia Rd6187553111726252 7017 Rancho Calif or nia Rd58185015Lyndie Ln68035 Lyndie Ln 10715172556Rancho California Rd244167516Moraga Rd45625356 Moraga Rd 14 20 25391450316 66210020Portofino 19 042 Rendezvous 75 0 2525175011Rancho California Rd70200062Humber Dr11 467 Cosmic Dr 68 8 91316759Rancho Ca lifornia Rd169182546Asteroid Wy 43 13 24 Yukon Rd1811168 23147338Ra ncho Cal ifor nia Rd 1311287393Margarita Rd 470 745321760115 Rancho California Rd725Rancho California Rd475175Old Town Front StRancho California RdRancho California Rd-18-1-23+21-210+190-70-46-52+159-54-132-3+1+6-24+10-62+30-24-12+13+20-122-56+11-35 Temecula Pkwy AM 1 196107065Rancho Puenlo Rd541073 Avenida De Missiones 1135720155082Temecula Pkwy17106182Country Glen Wy34013 Country Glen Wy 127422291551113Temecula Pkwy229750114128329330 Redhawk Pkwy 361 542 140169925101Temecula Pkwy16082068Camino Del Sol431362 Camino Del Sol 71162378101228Temecula Pkwy7962698Meadows Pkwy126209146 Apis Rd 9273356584833Temecula Pkwy067527Mahlon Vail Rd 75765885Temecula Pkwy95400100Butterfield Stage Rd79403181 Butterfield Stage Rd 2 6931160Temecula Pkwy26650085Dartola Rd202124776677 Margarita Rd 88716116Dartola Rd391540De Portola Rd306890Margarita Rd7458533 Margarita Rd 108584 59 De Portola Rd267460131-39+29+77-24-30 +50+30+32-83-14-850-87-52 +48-25 Temecula Pkwy AM 2 Teme cu la Pkwy 46142523Bedford Ct 4 3 4 8 5 7 Bedford Ct 3 5 5 97 2 3 222850138Te me cu la Pkw y88171716L Paz 2 9 6 2 3 L Paz 1 6 1 82 5 0 192725168Tem ecula Pkwy 187622Wabash Ln 5 2 1 6292853 01100813Pachange Pkwy 1423 2032111450 91125039Jedediah Smith Rd13731259 Jedediah Smith Rd 46 15 11601374105 272115056Rancho Community Wy574116 Kevin Pl 461062881400222Temecula Pkwy196107065Rancho Puenlo Rd541073 Avenida De Missiones 1135720155082Temecula Pkwy17106182Country Glen Wy34013 Country Glen Wy 127422291551113Temecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTem ecula Pkw yTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula Pkwy+6-16+7-3+9+21-18+77-23+80-26+62-39+29+77-24 Temecula Pkwy MD 1 141482118Country Glen Wy76337 Country Glen Wy 185104860126784Temecula Pkwy3351070170229494214 Redhawk Pkwy 226 413 159 257925163Temecula Pkwy1891113166Camino Del Sol9433125 Camino Del Sol 16859459497555Temecula Pkwy153923120Meadows Pkwy124178109 Apis Rd 169 181667576747Temecula Pkwy0102545Mahlon Vail Rd 1282130750Temecula Pkwy238525194Butterfield Stage Rd89350129 Butterfield Stage Rd 1 6 523451Temecula Pkwy9945058Dartola Rd49103610081162 Margarita Rd 84738164Dartola Rd791685De Portola Rd26218159Margarita Rd12869215 Margarita Rd 90676111De Portola Rd13319610610 11 12 13 14 15 1617 19 20 21 22 23 55 58 69 75 78 85 96 98 100 101 Temecula Pkwy MD 2 T em ecula P kw y 32182533B edford Ct 4 8 3 0 7 3 B edford Ct 2 5 1 03 6 6 43222573T em e cula P kw y 80204617L P az 9 4 1 6 L P a z 1 9 21 01 1 3 292208117T e m ecu la P kw y223139W a b ash L n 2 3 1 8192293 01325943Pac hange P kw y 1022 2292401300 97142567Jedediah Smith Rd16965128 Jedediah Smith Rd 80 32 451471321130 48157566Rancho Community Wy33457 Kevin Pl 4847190142531Temecula Pkwy1161496131Rancho Puenlo Rd74364 Avenida De Missiones 7741519138941Temecula Pkwy141482118Country Glen Wy76337 Country Glen Wy 185104860126784 Temecula PkwyTemecula PkwyT e m ecu la P kw yTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula Pkwy1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 28 29 31 32 34 35 37 39 48 49 52 55 58 63 82 102 103 104 105 Temecula Pkwy PM 1 Temecula Pkwy162144171Country Glen Wy114339 Country Glen Wy 156185559110078Temecula Pkwy5571656250268786199 Redhawk Pkwy 203 887 283 354700199Temecula Pkwy2451879181Camino Del Sol853563 Camino Del Sol 159467210990343Temecula Pkwy4711314162Meadows Pkwy194261164 Apis Rd 190 3038168650104Temecula Pkwy0145074Mahlon Vail Rd 1334385675Temecula Pkwy489700233Butterfield Stage Rd148666162 Butterfield Stage Rd 1 6 6753148Temecula Pkwy158400116Dartola Rd1031638118110878 Margarita Rd 781428169Dartola Rd921493De Portola Rd55465195Margarita Rd20699121 Margarita Rd 951329 283 De Portola Rd17220517310 11 12 13 14 15 1617 19 20 21 22 23 40 55 58 69 75 78 85 96 98 100 101 Temecula Pkwy PM 2 Te m e cula P k w y31297534B e dford C t 7 8 3 0 8 8 B edford Ct 1 9 4 02 7 9 26205095T e m ecu la P kw y235300025L P az 1 5 1 0 2 1 L P a z 3 1 41 21 0 1 462044437T em e c u la P k w y326883W a bash L n 4 4 2 0582500 018001547Pacha nge Pk wy 1650 854346925 384230090Jedediah Smith Rd20677129 Jedediah Smith Rd 62 78 641231100217 136230086Rancho Community Wy10514145 Kevin Pl 56488152125060Temecula Pkwy1562150210Rancho Puenlo Rd1601490 Avenida De Missiones 12481621121587Temecula Pkwy162144171Country Glen Wy114339 Country Glen Wy 156185559110078Temecula PTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyT em ecula P kw yTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula Pkwy1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 28 29 31 32 34 35 37 39 48 49 52 55 58 63 82 102 103 104 105 Temecula Pkwy WE MD 1 104656204356Temecula Pkwy3951612246321682228 Redhawk Pkwy 298 696 223 3941550250Temecula Pkwy2601721194Camino Del Sol10856104 Camino Del Sol 20960732051775112Temecula Pkwy2321455149Meadows Pkwy165270223 Apis Rd 212 227 106 157157553Temecula Pkwy0164341Mahlon Vail Rd 13422561607Temecula Pkwy3111025237Butterfield Stage Rd186447196 Butterfield Stage Rd 264377138Temecula Pkwy2421150161Dartola Rd381331144117387 Margarita Rd 119 975 224 Dartola Rd13126113De Portola Rd24336243Margarita Rd216101721 Margarita Rd 107989152De Portola Rd18629215711 12 13 14 15 1617 19 20 21 22 23 69 75 78 85 96 98 100 101 Temecula Pkwy WE MD 2 T e m e cu la P kw y 31272541B e dford Ct 7 2 2 9 1 2 7 Bedford Ct 3 1 7 05 5 7 51364881Te m e c u la P kw y 117301623L P az 2 3 1 3 2 L P az 2 5 8 91 9 6 363567273T em ecula P k w y321966Wabash L n 6 1 2 3343817 018001475Pachan ge Pkw y 1757 3723802025 1501958101Jedediah Smith Rd20295194 Jedediah Smith Rd 112 39 692062045173 43215077Rancho Community Wy7220160 Kevin Pl 7089183220028Temecula Pkwy382174161Rancho Puenlo Rd1272020 Avenida De Missiones 10411412220132Temecula Pkwy42166155Country Glen Wy39022 Country Glen Wy 194104656204356Temecula Pkwy3951612246321682228Da313117387De Portol23324101721 Temecula PkwyTemecula PkwyT em ecula P k w yTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula PkwyTemecula Pkwy1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 21 28 29 31 32 34 35 37 39 48 49 52 55 58 63 82 102 103 104 105 Winchester MD Diaz Rd 4 976506 Wi nchest er Rd243749475325300Diaz Rd3 3 36 7 2 Enterpri se C ir 2 6 295139 Win c h e st er Rd671050159171811109Enterprise Cir1636232 Jefferson Ave 154 520 400 2691075151588775461Jefferson Ave650651199 I-15 SB Ramp Winchester Rd18133071185525I-15 SB Ramp145165652 I-15 NB Ramp 27415775 Winchester Rd251275014501236I-15 NB Ramp Ynez Rd 787465340 Winchester Rd38420059343131623158Ynez Rd208470320 Promenade Mall W 17138111 Winchester Rd275185035016618428Promenade Mall W261355 Promenade Mall E 25055128 Winchester Rd21415002001981600130Margarita Meadows862875 Margarita Rd 225 411 588 Winchester Rd26313751657331438101Margarita Rd150426200 Roripaugh Rd 8 304 Winchester Rd3620459911210456Roripaugh Rd125631 Ni c o la s R d3961993 7 5 1 7 5 0 2 6 6Winche ster R d 1 6 7 1 6 0 03 0 N ic ol a s R d 261875Wi nchest er RdWinchester RdWi nchester RdWin c he ster R d Winchester PM Diaz Rd 3 255767 Wi nchest er Rd279511452510382Dia z R d763 157 2 Ente rpr ise C ir 6 154232 Wi nchest er Rd115192528816261875Enterprise Cir20911643 Jefferson Ave 40 1029 675 6851600117545571610Jefferson Ave816819185 I-15 SB Ramp Winchester Rd27263751096550I-15 SB Ramp168474632 I-15 NB Ramp 18329575 Winchester Rd3100130014721511I-15 NB Ramp Ynez Rd 8981124446 Winchester Rd59622618382861735207Ynez Rd188488384 Promenade Mall W 20036162 Winchester Rd2152389250176194210Promenade Mall W28662 Promenade Mall E 22371225 Winchester Rd2042250169220175086Margarita Meadows1252675 Margarita Rd 274 919 1100 Winchester Rd43121001409301487200Margarita Rd200550199 Roripaugh Rd 1 1 545 Winchester Rd753125286202365115Roripaugh Rd2172777 Ni c o la s R d472116189 1 4 1 2 7 0 0 4 1 1Win c h e ster R d 2 5 1 1 8 5 0 1 3 9 N ic o la s R d1 006375Wi nchester RdWinchester RdWi nchest er RdWinc h ester R d Winchester WE MD Diaz Rd 616325 Wi nchester Rd0201323824349D iaz R d509 128 0 En te rpr is e Ci r 3 910175 Wi nc hest er Rd1410003812543135Enterprise Cir611414 Jefferson Ave 45493 600 1851050127773450440Jefferson Ave697746162 I-15 SB Ramp Winchester Rd193842210931025I-15 SB Ramp2009126567 I-15 NB Ramp 260231042 Winchester Rd312082518751600I-15 NB Ramp Ynez Rd 952551420 Winchester Rd370263211714982222179Ynez Rd345713440 Promenade Mall W 23833143 Winchester Rd275235065036825778Promenade Mall W24947 Promenade Mall E 300102202 Winchester Rd29318502985152475174Margarita Meadows1125883 Margarita Rd 306 628 747 Winchester Rd341170021210382487172Margarita Rd225781319 Roripaugh Rd 1 1 926 Winchester Rd24260014221359490Roripaugh Rd1332140 N ic o la s R d57514196 3 4 2 2 5 0 3 2 6Win c h e ster R d 2 5 7 2 9 5 02 5 N ico la s R d 281375Wi nchest er RdWinchester RdWinchester RdWinc h ester Rd Winchester AM Diaz Rd 5 5116125 Wi nchester Rd315021824860792Diaz Rd1 2 5372 Enterpr ise Cir 2 0 84924 Wi nchester Rd29323621761866142Enterprise Cir43449 Jefferson Ave 114 391 250 119500597281237557Jefferson Ave429497392 I-15 SB Ramp Winchester Rd9112701540825I-15 SB Ramp100393970 I-15 NB Ramp 441 11 486 Winchester Rd14135001937600I-15 NB Ramp Ynez Rd 367 185 84 Winchester Rd2541084585310178376Ynez Rd98510468 Promenade Mall W 25 12 25 Winchester Rd7910358284215110Promenade Mall W4412 Promenade Mall E 32 13 17 Winchester Rd988855576212186Margarita Meadows39851 Margarita Rd 154 340 335 Winchester Rd92650125873196282Margarita Rd133524217 Roripaugh Rd 40 615063 Winchester Rd12595031112300112Roripaugh Rd10813125 N icolas R d 4 2 6505117 3 7 3 5 9 4 9 4Winch e ster Rd 1 6 8 1 8 6 9 4 8 4 Ni c o la s R d 542557Wi nchester RdWinchester RdWinchester RdWin c h e st er Rd Coordinated Signal Timing Report Appendix B: Tru‐Traffic Data Rancho California Road Rancho California Road (Pre‐Optimization/Post‐Optimization)Between Diaz Rd and Margarita RdTravel Distance: 2.4 MilesBefore/After (EB)AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)11.011.411.95.66.24.5‐49%‐45%‐62%AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)23.823.022.028.826.135.621%14%62%AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)7.47.47.62.44.01.4‐68%‐46%‐82%Before/After (WB)AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)11.510.812.06.65.05.6‐42%‐53%‐54%AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)22.824.221.624.031.731.15%31%44%AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)7.67.87.84.31.42.2‐44%‐82%‐72%% ChangeStops (no.)BeforeAfter% ChangeAfter% ChangeSpeed (mph)BeforeAfterBeforeAfter% ChangeTravel Time (min)BeforeSpeed (mph)BeforeAfter% ChangeStops (no.)Travel Time (min)BeforeAfter% Change‐49%‐45%‐62%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB)BeforeAfter‐68%‐46%‐82%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.010.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (EB)BeforeAfter‐42%‐53%‐54%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB)BeforeAfter5%31%44%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB)BeforeAfter‐44%‐82%‐72%‐100%‐50%0%50%100%150%200%0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.010.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB)BeforeAfter21%14%62%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)BeforeAfterAppendix B Temecula Parkway Temecula Parkway (Pre-Optimization/Post-Optimization) Between Old Town Front St - I-15 SB Ramps and Butterfield Stage Road Travel Distance: 3.9 Miles Before/After (EB) AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 8.8 9.9 11.1 6.8 7.7 7.7 -22%-22%-31% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 27.3 24.1 21.8 34.7 29.5 29.1 27%22%33% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 5.0 7.0 7.6 3.6 3.0 2.8 -28%-57%-63% Before/After (WB) AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 9.9 9.5 10.4 6.5 8.8 9.0 -34%-7%-14% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 24.1 25.2 23.0 36.6 27.1 27.7 52%8%21% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 8.2 4.6 6.4 2.5 4.2 4.4 -70%-9%-31% Travel Time (min) Before After % Change Speed (mph) Before After % Change Stops (no.) Before After % Change Travel Time (min) Before After % Change Speed (mph) Before After % Change Stops (no.) Before After % Change -22%-22%-31% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB) Before After 27%22%33% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Speed (mph)Before After Speed (EB) -28%-57%-63% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Stops (no.)Stops (EB) Before After -34%-7%-14% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB) Before After 52%8%21% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB) Before After -70%-9%-31% -100% -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB) Before After Appendix B Winchester Road Winchester Road (Pre-Optimization/Post-Optimization) Between Business Diaz Rd and Nicolas Rd Travel Distance: 2.3 Miles Before/After (NB) AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 7.2 9.2 13.1 7.1 6.1 8.8 -1%-33%-32% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 19.1 11.8 11.1 19.8 21.7 17.3 4%85%56% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 4.6 7.0 9.0 4.8 3.7 5.0 4%-48%-44% Before/After (SB) AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 8.7 7.9 8.3 6.9 6.4 7.0 -20%-19%-16% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 16.9 13.7 13.0 20.1 21.9 19.7 19%60%52% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 6.4 5.8 5.8 5.0 3.4 4.2 -22%-41%-27% Travel Time (min) Before After % Change Speed (mph) Before After % Change Stops (no.) Before After % Change Travel Time (min) Before After % Change Speed (mph) Before After % Change Stops (no.) Before After % Change -1%-33%-32% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB) Before After 4%85%56% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Speed (mph)Before After 4%-48%-44% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Stops (no.)Stops (EB) Before After -20%-19%-16% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB) Before After 19%60%52% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB) Before After -22%-41%-27% -100% -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB) Before After Speed (EB) Appendix B Coordinated Signal Timing Report Appendix C: Field Notes Intersection Plan Deficiency Resolution/Suggestion Temecula Parkway & Margarita AM Ø1 split too short. Shortened vehicle extensions on Ø4 & 8, resulting in a faster gap, returning time to Ø1 & 5. Temecula Parkway & La Paz AM Sequence incorrect. Ø1 & 5 changed lagging to leading. Temecula Parkway & Jedediah Smith AM Ø1 split too short.No time could be taken from other phases. Impact on traffic too minor to make significant changes. Temecula Parkway & Margarita MD Ø5 releasing too early and hitting traffic at Dartola. Offset was adjusted so that vehicles arrive on green at Dartola. Temecula Parkway & Apis MD Ø3 split too short. Changed Ø3 to a lag so it runs with Ø8. Rancho California & Jefferson AM/MD/PM Ø2 & 5 loops are reporting detector failure. Reported to City for repair. Rancho California & Jefferson AM Ø1 split too short. Removed 5s from Ø2 to give to Ø1. Rancho California & Ynez AM/MD/PM Bad loop on Ø4 RTL. Turned off detector and reported to City. Rancho California & Ynez AM/MD/PM Vehicles releasing early from Via Las Colinas were arriving at the back of the platoon on red at Ynez. Adjusted offset by 5s at Ynez to allow the platoon to arrive on green. Rancho California & Ynez PM Ø1 EBL movement unable to clear due to lack of storage at neighboring NB intersection. Reported to City and recommended the nearby signal be coordinated. Rancho California & Portofino MD Ø4 video detection was placing a constant call due to poor zone dimensions. This was stopping the mainline and causing significant delay. Redrew zones. Rancho California & Portofino to Asteroid Way AM/MD/PM Due to a the 150s cycle, side street delay is more noticeable to residential intersections. Notified City and advised possible modifications such as P2P operation or hold/release operation in the future. Winchester & Roripaugh AM Ø4 FDW clearance interval creates a bust. Reduced LPI interval to 3s to compensate. Winchester & Nicolas AM/MD Heavy school traffic for pickup and dropoff causes congestion. Not enough storage capacity to compensate. Advised that City remove one of two side street pedestrian movements to prevent time being robbed from the mainline. Reduced LPI interval to 3s to compensate. Winchester & Ynez MD/PM Intersection is at capacity at a 140s cycle. Vehicles stage in the #3 lane as far as 3 signals back to get on the 15 NB. Advised City of increased traffic violation enforcement for red light runners and drivers blocking intersection. Winchester & Margarita MD/PM Heavy NBT and NBR volumes from the Middle School south of Winchester. Modified splits as much as possible without robbing more than 10s from the mainline. Intersection is at capacity and used as a passthrough for vehicles coming from Temecula Parkway & Rancho California to get to the 15. Winchester & Jefferson/Diaz PM Intersections both at capacity, especially NB movement. Corridors are being used as a bypass to get to the 15 from neighboring business parks. Possible signage/enforcement to prevent side street/frontage roads from being utilized as a shortcut. Temecula Parkway Rancho California Winchester Rancho California Road Rancho California Road (Pre‐Optimization/Post‐Optimization)Between Diaz Rd and Margarita RdTravel Distance: 2.4 MilesBefore/After (EB)AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)11.011.411.95.66.24.5‐49%‐45%‐62%AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)23.823.022.028.826.135.621%14%62%AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)7.47.47.62.44.01.4‐68%‐46%‐82%Before/After (WB)AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)11.510.812.06.65.05.6‐42%‐53%‐54%AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)22.824.221.624.031.731.15%31%44%AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)7.67.87.84.31.42.2‐44%‐82%‐72%% ChangeStops (no.)BeforeAfter% ChangeAfter% ChangeSpeed (mph)BeforeAfterBeforeAfter% ChangeTravel Time (min)BeforeSpeed (mph)BeforeAfter% ChangeStops (no.)Travel Time (min)BeforeAfter% Change‐49%‐45%‐62%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB)BeforeAfter‐68%‐46%‐82%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.010.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (EB)BeforeAfter‐42%‐53%‐54%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB)BeforeAfter5%31%44%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB)BeforeAfter‐44%‐82%‐72%‐100%‐50%0%50%100%150%200%0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.010.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB)BeforeAfter21%14%62%‐100%‐80%‐60%‐40%‐20%0%20%40%60%80%100%0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.0AM (7‐9) MID (11‐1) PM (4‐6)Speed (mph)BeforeAfterAppendix B Temecula Parkway Temecula Parkway (Pre-Optimization/Post-Optimization) Between Old Town Front St - I-15 SB Ramps and Butterfield Stage Road Travel Distance: 3.9 Miles Before/After (EB) AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 8.8 9.9 11.1 6.8 7.7 7.7 -22%-22%-31% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 27.3 24.1 21.8 34.7 29.5 29.1 27%22%33% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 5.0 7.0 7.6 3.6 3.0 2.8 -28%-57%-63% Before/After (WB) AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 9.9 9.5 10.4 6.5 8.8 9.0 -34%-7%-14% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 24.1 25.2 23.0 36.6 27.1 27.7 52%8%21% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 8.2 4.6 6.4 2.5 4.2 4.4 -70%-9%-31% Travel Time (min) Before After % Change Speed (mph) Before After % Change Stops (no.) Before After % Change Travel Time (min) Before After % Change Speed (mph) Before After % Change Stops (no.) Before After % Change -22%-22%-31% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB) Before After 27%22%33% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Speed (mph)Before After Speed (EB) -28%-57%-63% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Stops (no.)Stops (EB) Before After -34%-7%-14% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB) Before After 52%8%21% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB) Before After -70%-9%-31% -100% -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB) Before After Appendix B Winchester Road Winchester Road (Pre-Optimization/Post-Optimization) Between Business Diaz Rd and Nicolas Rd Travel Distance: 2.3 Miles Before/After (NB) AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 7.2 9.2 13.1 7.1 6.1 8.8 -1%-33%-32% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 19.1 11.8 11.1 19.8 21.7 17.3 4%85%56% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 4.6 7.0 9.0 4.8 3.7 5.0 4%-48%-44% Before/After (SB) AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 8.7 7.9 8.3 6.9 6.4 7.0 -20%-19%-16% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 16.9 13.7 13.0 20.1 21.9 19.7 19%60%52% AM (7-9)MID (11-1)PM (4-6) 6.4 5.8 5.8 5.0 3.4 4.2 -22%-41%-27% Travel Time (min) Before After % Change Speed (mph) Before After % Change Stops (no.) Before After % Change Travel Time (min) Before After % Change Speed (mph) Before After % Change Stops (no.) Before After % Change -1%-33%-32% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (EB) Before After 4%85%56% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Speed (mph)Before After 4%-48%-44% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Stops (no.)Stops (EB) Before After -20%-19%-16% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Travel Time (min)Travel Time (WB) Before After 19%60%52% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Speed (mph)Speed (WB) Before After -22%-41%-27% -100% -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 AM (7-9) MID (11-1) PM (4-6)Stops (no.)Stops (WB) Before After Speed (EB) Appendix B Item No. 3 1 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 28, 2023 SUBJECT: Stop Controls and Pedestrian Analysis for Mercedes Street between 6th Street and 3rd Street PREPARED BY: Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer Erick Escobedo, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersections of Mercedes Street/5th Street and Merecedes Street/4th Street. 2. Recommend staff implement striped pedestrian crosswalks at intersections of Mercedes Street/6th Street, Mercedes/5th Street, Mercedes/4th Street, and Merecedes/3rd Street pending City Council adoption of Multi-Way Stop Controls. BACKGROUND: To improve circulation and pedestrian safety in the downtown area, City of Temecula staff were requested to review the Mercedes Street corridor from 6th Street to 3rd Street. Due to the number of special events and lack of controlled and convenient crosswalk locations across Mercedes Street, the City wanted to explore options for pedestrian improvements. After a field review of the corridor, Staff determined that pedestrian crosswalks could be implemented at existing all-way stop sign locations on Mercedes Street. Additionally, Staff determined that the intersections of Merecedes Street/5th Street and Mercedes Street/4th Street warranted further analysis for stop and pedestrian controls. Mercedes Street is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway providing access to businesses and residential streets in the downtown area. The posted speed limit on Mercedes Street is 25 MPH and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on is approximately 3,000 ADT. Recent speed data collection confirmed an 85th percentile speed of 20 MPH for this stretch of Mercedes Street. 6th Street is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway providing access to business and residential units in the downtown area. 6th Street has a speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 850 ADT. 5th Street is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway providing access to business and residential units in the downtown area. 5th Street has a speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 830 ADT. 2 4th Street is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway providing access to business and residential units in the downtown area. 4th Street has a speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 870 ADT. 3rd Street is a forty (40) foot wide local roadway providing access to business and residential units in the downtown area. 3rd Street has a speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 1,060 ADT. In September 2023, staff generated speed and volume data for the months of April 2022 and September 2022 using Streetlight Data software. Over this two (2) month period, review of prevailing (85th percentile) speeds indicates that speeds vary from 15 to 20 miles per hour during peak AM and PM hours on posted 25 MPH segments of Mercedes Street and accompanying side streets. The results of the speed data review indicate that there is not a speeding issue along the downtown corridors. The collected volume data was used to evaluate entering volumes and prevailing speeds for the intersections of Mercedes Street/5th Street and Mercedes/4th Street. In addition to the data collection, a review of intersection characteristics and conditions was performed, which included an evaluation of sight distance, collision history, and completion of a multi-way stop warrant analysis at both intersections. An evaluation of sight distance was performed at the intersections of Mercedes Street/5th Street and Mercedes/4th Street. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of 155 feet is required for the posted 25 mph speed limit on Mercedes Street. The results of the evaluation are shown in the table below: Mercedes Street/5th Street Location Sight Distance Required Visibility (Posted 25 MPH) 5th Street (Eastbound) Looking North Looking South 5th Street (Westbound) Looking North Looking South 90’ 140’ 115’ 90’ 155’ 155’ 155’ 155’ 3 Mercedes Street/4th Street Location Sight Distance Required Visibility (Posted 25 MPH) 4th Street (Eastbound) Looking North Looking South 4th Street (Westbound) Looking North Looking South 90’ 115’ 115’ 115’ 155’ 155’ 155’ 155’ As shown, the visibility at the intersections of Mercedes Street/5th Street and Mercedes Street/5th Street does not meet required visibility for any side street movement for the posted speed limit. The reason for subpar sight visibility is due to parked cars on Mercedes Street. A review of the collision history for the three (3) year period from September 1, 2020 to September 30, 2023, indicates there were three (3) reported collisions at the intersection of Mercedes Street/5th Street. The accidents were property only damage accidents. A review of the collision history for the three (3) year period from September 1, 2020 to September 30, 2023, indicates there were two (2) reported collisions at the intersection of Mercedes Street/4th Street. The accidents were property only damage accidents. The Multi-Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets’ warrant criteria was used to evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs at the intersection. The warrants allow for the installation of multi-way stop signs when the following conditions are satisfied: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is equal to or greater than three hundred (300) vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day; and b. The combined vehicular volume and pedestrian volume from the minor street is equal to or greater than one hundred (100) per hour for the same eight (8) hours. 2. Collision History a. Three (3) or more reported collisions within a twelve (12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Roadway Characteristics a. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles per day, b. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs. 4 c. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split; and d. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. Warrants for Minimum Traffic Volumes, Collision History and Roadway Characteristics must be met to justify the installation of a multi-way stop. Other criteria that may be considered when evaluating the need for multi-way stop signs include: 4. Visibility a. The intersections sight distance is less than: 150 feet for 25 MPH 200 feet for 30 MPH 250 feet for 35 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route to School plan. 8. There are no traffic signals or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. The multi-way stop warrant analysis performed found that the required Warrants 1, 2 & 3 were not satisfied and all-way stop controls are not justified at the intersection based on quantitative data. However, the policy does provide the flexibility to consider the need to control vehicle and pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as business districts, parks, and activity centers. During field reviews, staff noticed elevated amounts of pedestrian traffic throughout the day on Mercedes Street accessing City Hall, the Sam Hicks Memorial Park, and downtown businesses. These pedestrians typically crossed at random uncontrolled locations on Mercedes Street. The Policy also allows the consideration to control vehicle and pedestrian conflicts near locations where visibility constraints occur. Based on the review of the intersections under these criteria of high pedestrian activity combined with visibility constraints, staff has determined there is justification for all-way stop controls at the intersections of Mercedes Street/5th Street and Mercedes Street/5th. For the locations of Mercedes Street/6th Street, Mercedes Street/5th Street, Mercedes Street/4th Street, Mercedes Street/3rd Street, staff recommends installation of striped pedestrian crosswalks to increase pedestrian visibility and safety. Implementation of these crosswalks may require 5 installation of upgraded ADA compliant curb ramps but that will be completed on an as-needed basis and as funding becomes available. Staff recommends establishing all-way stop controls and striped pedestrian crosswalks at the intersections of Mercedes Street/5th Street and Mercedes Street/5th. Staff also recommends installation of striped pedestrian crosswalks at the existing all-way stop intersections of Mercedes Street/6th Street and Mercedes Street/3rd. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with the recommended action. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1 – Mercedes Crosswalk Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis Exhibit 3 – Accident Data STOPMERCEDES ST.SIXTH ST.SIXTH ST.STOPSTOPFIFTH ST.MERCEDES ST.FIFTH ST. STOPSTOP MERCEDES ST.FOURTH ST.FOURTH ST. THIRD ST.MERCEDES ST.© 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS © 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS MERCEDES ST.MAIN ST.© 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS © 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS © 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS © 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS STOPSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOPMERCEDES ST.SIXTH ST.SIXTH ST.FIFTH ST.MERCEDES ST.FIFTH ST.MERCEDES ST.FOURTH ST.FOURTH ST.MERCEDES ST.THIRD ST.MERCEDES ST.SECOND ST.MERCEDES STREET & FOURTH STREETMERCEDES STREET & SIXTH STREETMERCEDES STREET & THIRD STREETMERCEDES STREET & FIFTH STREETMERCEDES STREET & MAIN STREETMERCEDES STREET CORRIDOR1 Major Street: 25 MPH Minor Street:25 MPH Yes No X 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM Hour Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the area. 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. 8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet for 25 MPH 200 feet for 30 MPH 250 feet for 35 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) Satisfied 4. Visibility per day, B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split, and 3 OR MORE in 1 year period 2 3. Roadway Characteristics Satisfied (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles 2. Collision History Satisfied MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 60 53 66 78 Ped Volume (Minor Street) 100 Combined Vehicular 66 89 97 76 491 520 592 509Approaches 300 Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied 1. Minimum Vehicular Volume Satisfied MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Total All 407 546 556 531 MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Mercedes Street Critical Approach Speed 5th Street Critical Approach Speed Major Street: 25 MPH Minor Street:25 MPH Yes No X 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM Hour Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the area. 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. 8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet for 25 MPH 200 feet for 30 MPH 250 feet for 35 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) Satisfied 4. Visibility per day, B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split, and 3 OR MORE in 1 year period 2 3. Roadway Characteristics Satisfied (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles 2. Collision History Satisfied MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 74 70 77 65 Ped Volume (Minor Street) 100 Combined Vehicular 77 99 97 83 465 489 576 489Approaches 300 Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied 1. Minimum Vehicular Volume Satisfied MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Total All 369 507 518 493 MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Mercedes Street Critical Approach Speed 4th Street Critical Approach Speed Collision Summary Report City of Temecula Public Works Traffic Division 9/20/23 From 09/01/2020 to 09/01/2023 Total Collisions: 3 Injury Collisions: 0 Fatal Collisions: 0 MERCEDES ST & FIFTH ST Page 1 of 1 TE210990247 04/09/2021 22:12 Friday Sideswipe Parked Motor Vehicle MERCEDES ST - FIFTH ST Improper Turning 91' Direction: NORTH Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 022107 Hit & Run: Misde Dark - Street Lig Clear Pty at Fault:1 Not Stated Age: Not Sta Assoc Factor: None Apparent Making Left Turn Sobriety: Impairment Not KnoVeh Type: NORTDriverParty 1 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER Not Stated Age: Not Sta Assoc Factor: None Apparent Parked Sobriety: Not ApplicableVeh Type: Not SParked VehicleParty 2 2017 SUBARU CROSSTREK Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Not Stated Age: 27M Assoc Factor: Other Other Sobriety: Not ApplicableVeh Type: Not SOtherParty 3 TE211990062 07/17/2021 21:00 Saturday Rear-End Parked Motor Vehicle MERCEDES ST - FIFTH ST Improper Turning 0' Direction: Not Stated Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 022107 Hit & Run: Misde Dark - Street Lig Clear Pty at Fault:1 Not StatedM/C Helmet Driver - Yes Age: 66M Assoc Factor: None Apparent Other Unsafe Turning Sobriety: HNBDVeh Type: SOUTDriverParty 1 1996 HARLEY DAVIDS MC Motorcycle Cell Phone Not In Use Age: Not Sta Assoc Factor: None Apparent Parked Sobriety: Not ApplicableVeh Type: SOUTParked VehicleParty 2 2020 HONDA CIVIC Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep TE221320285 05/12/2022 19:35 Thursday Rear-End Parked Motor Vehicle MERCEDES ST - FIFTH ST Unsafe Speed 58' Direction: SOUTH Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 022350 Hit & Run: Misde Dark - Street Lig Clear Pty at Fault:1 Cell Phone Not In Use Age: U Assoc Factor: None Apparent Proceeding Straight Sobriety: Impairment Not KnoVeh Type: SOUTDriverParty 1 2001 FORD RANGER Pickups & Panels Cell Phone Not In Use Age: Not Sta Assoc Factor: None Apparent Parked Sobriety: Not ApplicableVeh Type: SOUTParked VehicleParty 2 2018 MAZDA 6 Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Settings for Query: Street: MERCEDES ST Cross Street: FIFTH ST Intersection Related: True City: Temecula Sorted By: Date and Time Collision Summary Report City of Temecula Public Works Traffic Division 9/20/23 From 09/01/2020 to 09/01/2023 Total Collisions: 2 Injury Collisions: 0 Fatal Collisions: 0 MERCEDES ST & FOURTH ST Page 1 of 1 TE213530113 12/19/2021 01:00 Sunday Rear-End Other Motor Vehicle MERCEDES ST - FOURTH ST Improper Turning 110' Direction: NORTH Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 022107 Hit & Run: No Dark - Street Lig Clear Pty at Fault:1 Not Stated Age: M Assoc Factor: None Apparent Entering Traffic Sobriety: Impairment Not KnoVeh Type: NORTDriverParty 1 2015 CHEVROLET Pickups & Panels Not StatedLap/Shoulder Harness Used Age: 30F Assoc Factor: None Apparent Stopped In Road Sobriety: HNBDVeh Type: NORTDriverParty 2 2012 NISSAN JUKE Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep TE222940144 10/21/2022 14:51 Friday Broadside Other Motor Vehicle MERCEDES ST - FOURTH ST Improper Turning 0' Direction: Not Stated Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 022107 Hit & Run: No Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1 Cell Phone Not In UseLap/Shoulder Harness Used Age: 29M Assoc Factor: None Apparent Making U Turn Sobriety: HNBDVeh Type: SOUTDriverParty 1 2017 MAZDA MAZDA3 Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Cell Phone Not In UseM/C Helmet Driver - Yes Age: 50M Assoc Factor: None Apparent Proceeding Straight Sobriety: HNBDVeh Type: SOUTDriverParty 2 2019 BMW Motorcycle Settings for Query: Street: MERCEDES ST Cross Street: FOURTH ST Intersection Related: True City: Temecula Sorted By: Date and Time Item No. 4 California Highway Patrol Temecula Area Report for August 2023 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Services Provided •Child Safety Seats -12 •Traffic Safety Presentations –4 •Community Events/Booths –4 •Electric Bicycle Safety and Training Course now online This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC Enforcement Activity •Citations Issued –768 •Total Enforcement Contacts – 1342 •SEU in French Valley August 30th 2 sergeants and 11 officers. 100+ citations, 10 verbal warnings, 4 vehicles impounded, 1 drug DUI arrest This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Driving Under the Influence •Monthly Arrests –46 •DUI crashes -14 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY ND Traffic Collisions •Non-Injury –83 •Injury –62 •Fatal –3 •Fatal Year to Date –19 •Total Collisions –146 Fatal Traffic Collisions / Major Investigations •S/B I-15 s/of Wildomar Trail (3 vehicles) •S/B I-15 n/of California Oaks (solo vehicle) •SR-74 at 7th Street (2 vehicle head-on) This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Item No. 5 City of Temecula Traffic Report -August 2023 Southwest Sheriff Station Citation Totals Total Hazardous Citations 1156 Total Non-Hazardous Citations 224 Seatbelt Citations (Included)21 Cell phone Citations (Included)241 Parking Citations 156 Written Warnings Issued (Included)431 Total Citations Issued 1967 City Funded Targeted Enforcement S.L.A.P. Citations (Included)108 Commercial Enforcement Citations (Included)32 Driving Under the Influence D.U.I. Arrests 32 D.U.I. Arrests YTD 247 D.U.I. YTD Previous Year (2022)327 OTS/City Funded Special Operations DUI Checkpoints 1 Targeted Traffic Enforcement Saturation 1 June July Aug 3 Month Total Citations Issued for Hazardous Citations (Moving Viol.)1619 1052 1156 3827 Non-Hazardous Citations 195 112 224 531 “Click It or Ticket” and/or Seatbelt Citations 39 17 21 77 Distracted Driver (Cell Phone Use)296 240 241 777 Parking Citations 183 224 156 563 Written Warnings Issued 452 329 431 1212 Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) Red Light 177 49 108 334 Commercial Enforcement Citations 42 21 32 95 Non-Injury Collisions 20 23 24 67 Injury Collisions 28 25 25 78 DUI Arrests 31 25 32 88 Item No. 6