Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01252022 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 25, 2022 - 7:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 6:00 P.M. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the acquisition of an approximate 52,092 square foot area in fee (Project Parcel 24624-1) from and the owner's interest in the billboard and ground lease in connection with the billboard on the real property located on the vacant real property located on the east side of 1-15/1-215 and on the west side of Jackson Avenue in the City of Murrieta, California, and identified as APNs 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, and 910-060-015 in connection with the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owner, Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company. Negotiators for the City are Patrick Thomas and Kendra Hannah-Meistrell. Under negotiations are price and terms for the acquisition of the above -described subject property interests. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn PRELUDE MUSIC: Susan Miyamoto INVOCATION: Marti Treckman of Grace Presbyterian Church FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Presentation by Connie Stopher, Economic Development Coalition Executive Director Presentation by Robb Grantham, Rancho California Water District General Manager BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Planning Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Page 1 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Attachments: Agenda Report 2. Approve Action Minutes of January 18, 2022 Recommendation: Attachments: That the City Council approve the action minutes of January 18, 2022. Action Minutes 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Page 2 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 4. 5. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands Authorize the Submittal of an Application to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for Funding from the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AUTHORIZE THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES RECYCLING AND RECOVERY (CALRECYCLE) FOR FUNDING FROM THE SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Approve Purchase and Sale Agreement for Acquisition of Certain Property Interests and Loss of Ground Lease Rent and Interests for Billboard on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, 910-060-015 in Connection with I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase H, PW 16-01 Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND LARCHMONT PARK, LLC IN CONNECTION WITH THE I-15/FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS — PHASE II (PORTIONS OF APN'S 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, 910-060-015) 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute all necessary Page 3 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 6. 7. documents, including those in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report, and take all necessary actions to effectuate the purchase of the approximate 52,090 square foot fee area from and the loss of ground lease rent and interests of owners in and to the billboard on the real property located on the vacant real property located on the west side of Jackson Avenue in the City of Murrieta, California, and identified as APN's 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, 910-060-015. Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Purchase and Sale Agreement Property Location Project Description Project Location Approve First Amended and Restated Term Sheet with United States Department of Transportation for I-I5/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II, PW 16-01 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the First Amended and Restated Term Sheet with the United States Department of Transportation for I-I5/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II, PW 16-01. Attachments: Agenda Report First Amended and Restated Term Sheet Project Description Project Location Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Pavement Rehabilitation Program - CiWyide - West Side Business Park Area, PW 19-17 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the improvements for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program Citywide - West Side Business Park Area, PW 19-17, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release Page 4 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 8. Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for ADA Compliance for Pavement Rehab Projzram - West Side Business Park Area, PW20-08 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the improvements for the ADA Compliance for Pavement Rehab Program - West Side Business Park Area, PW20-08, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 5 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President James Stewart ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 9. Approve Action Minutes of January 18, 2022 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of January 18, 2022. Attachments: Action Minutes CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS Page 6 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 7 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CALL TO ORDER: Chair Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart SARDA PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. SARDA CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 10. Approve Action Minutes of January 18, 2022 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of January 18, 2022. Attachments: Action Minutes SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS Page 8 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 SARDA ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING Page 9 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. For all Public Hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. At Public Hearings involving land use matters the property owner or the applicant/property owner has the burden of proof and, therefore, shall be allowed 15 minutes for an initial presentation and an additional 10 minutes for rebuttal by its development team following other comments on the matter. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the property owner or applicant. An appellant, other than the property owner or applicant, and the spokesperson for an organized group of residents residing within the noticed area of the property, which is the subject of the Public Hearing, shall be allowed 15 minutes to present the appellant's position to the Council. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the appellant. All other members of the public may speak during the Public Hearing for a maximum period of 5 minutes each. Deferral of one speaker's time to another is not permitted. In the event there is a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 11. Conduct a Public Hearing for the Purposes of Redistricting in the City of Temecula Recommendation: That the City Council conduct the third of four public hearings for the purposes of redistricting in the City of Temecula. Attachments: Agenda Report Presentation Draft Maps 12. Adopt Ordinance Amendiniz Title 15 and Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code Pertaininii to (1) Large Family Daycare Homes, (2) Clarify the Standards that Apply to Senior Housings Transitional Housing„ Supportive Housing Emergency Shelters, Trash Enclosures, Self -Storage or Mini -Warehouse Facilities and to Projects Using the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, (3) Establish Standards and Requirements for Dedications and Improvements for Developments Without a Subdivision, (4)Update Hose Development Impact Fees Can Be Used, (5) Clarify Where Artificial Turf Can Be Installed, and (6) Make Minor Typographical Edits and Finding the Ordinance to be Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3) Recommendation: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: Page 10 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 15 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) COMPLY WITH STATE LAW CHANGES TO LARGE FAMILY DAYCARE HOMES, (2) CLARIFY THE STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO SENIOR HOUSING, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING, SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, SELF -STORAGE OR MINI -WAREHOUSE FACILITIES AND TO PROJECTS USING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, (3) ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT A SUBDIVISION, (4) UPDATE HOW DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CAN BE USED, (5) CLARIFY WHERE ARTIFICIAL TURF CAN BE INSTALLED, AND (6) MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (13)(3) Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance Planning Commission Agenda Report Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-41 Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Exemption 13. Introduce an Ordinance Amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to Revise the Multi -Family Definition and Require that Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments Comply with Objective Design Standards and Adopt Resolution to Establish Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development Consistent with State Housing aws Recommendation: That the City Council: Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE THE MULTI -FAMILY DEFINITION AND REQUIRE THAT MULTI -FAMILY AND MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENTS COMPLY WITH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS AND MAKE THE FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3) AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION Page 11 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 Attachments BUSINESS 65852.21(J) AND 66411.7(N) (LONG-RANGE PROJECT NO. LR18-1684) 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTI -FAMILY AND MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENTS Agenda Report Ordinance Resolution Obiective Design Standards for Multi-Familv and Mixed -Use Development "Exhibit A" Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Exemption Planning Commission Agenda Report Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-40 Any member of the public may address the City Council on items that appear on the Business portion of the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 14. Appoint Member to the Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission Recommendation: That the City Council appoint a member to the Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission. Attachments: Agenda Report Application Packet DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 15. Community Development Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Planning Activity Report Page 12 City Council Agenda January 25, 2022 16. Police Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Incident Summaries 17. Public Works Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Project Status Report ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS Any Council Member, including the Mayor, may request an item be placed on a future agenda. Any such request will be discussed under this section. In making the request, a Council Member may briefly describe the topic of the proposed agenda item and any timing associated with the placement of the item on the agenda. This description shall not exceed 3 minutes unless extended by a majority vote of the City Council. No substantive discussion on the subject of the motion may occur. General discussion amongst the City Council on items listed under this section of the agenda shall be limited to 15 minutes. Items may only be placed on the agenda by Council Members pursuant to policy or by the City Manager based on administrative or operational needs of the City. Public comments on the placement of these agenda items shall be limited to a maximum of 30 minutes. Individual comments shall not exceed 3 minutes. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings and Agenda Placements by Council Members adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 13 Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 18, 2022 - 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 7:00 PM: Mayor Matt Rahn PRELUDE MUSIC: Susan Miyamoto INVOCATION: Sylvester Scott of Baha'is of Temecula FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Presentation Regarding Incoming/Outgoing Mayor and President Presentation Regarding Years of Service for Council Member James Stewart (5) and Commissioners Bradley Sullivan (5), Robert Carter (10) and Bob Hagel (15) Presentation of Proclamation for National Mentoring Month to Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Inland Empire BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission, Planning Commission, and Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT Riverside County Sheriffs Department PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council on non -agenda item(s): • Bob Kowell • Julie Zulfiqar PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment on an agenda item(s): • Rick Reiss (Item #13) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion Schwank, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2. Approve Action Minutes of December 14, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of December 14, 2021. 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4. Approve Annual Citywide Records Retention Schedule and Records Destruction for Calendar Year 2022 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE ESTABLISHED CITYWIDE RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE, THEREBY AMENDING AND RESTATING THE RECORDS RETENTION POLICY, AND APPROVING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS 5. Approve Annual Legislative Platform for Calendar Year 2022 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the annual legislative platform for calendar year 2022. 6. Annrove Annual Boards and Commissions Handbook for Calendar Year 2022 2 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the annual boards and commissions handbook for calendar year 2022. 7. Approve Second Amendment to the Agreement with Placeworks Inc. for the Creation of Objective Design Standards Recommendation: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the agreement for consultant services with Placeworks Inc., in the amount of $3,000, for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. 8. Adoat Resolution Annrovina Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Purchase of an Approximate 325 Square Foot Permanent Easement on the Real Property Located South of Nicolas Road and West of Butterfield Stage Road (APN's 957-130-003 and 957-130-013) in Connection with Drainage, Flood Control, and Flood Channel Improvements Along the Santa Gertrudis Creek Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT, SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, GENERAL RELEASE, AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND 3270 W. LINCOLN LLC (RIVERSIDE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 957-130-003 AND 957-130-013) 9. Establish All -Way Stop Control at the Intersection of Roripaugh Road and Swallow Court Recommendation: RECESS: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF RORIPAUGH ROAD AND SWALLOW COURT AND FINDING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15301(c) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES At 7:37 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting and the Successor Agency of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 7:41 PM the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 12. Consider Appointments to City Council Committees for Calendar Year 2022 Recommendation: That the City Council appoint members to serve on committees for calendar year 2022 and approve related City Council Committee Appointments List. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion Stewart, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 13. Consider State and Federal Legislative Mandates (At the Request of Mayor Rahn) Recommendation: That the City Council consider state and federal legislative mandates and provide general direction regarding the same. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion Schwank, Second by Edwards. The vote reflected unanimous approval. City Council provided general direction regarding the same. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS — Receive and File 14. Police Department Monthly Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS A. Recognition for Supervisor Chuck Washington (At the Request of Mayor Pro Tempore Schwank) Council Approved (5-0): Motion Edwards, Second by Alexander. The vote reflected unanimous approval. B. Medal of Bravery for Extraordinary Courage (At the Request of Council Member Alexander) Council Approved (5-0): Motion Stewart, Second by Edwards. The vote reflected unanimous approval. C. Term Limits for City Council Members (At the Request of Council Member Alexander) Council Approved (5-0): Motion Alexander, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 4 ADJOURNMENT At 9:00 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 25, 2022, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Adjourned in Memory of Peg Moore Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pam Espinoza, Accounting Technician I RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $4,392,936.43. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 01/06/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/06/2022 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: $3,773,224.48 619,711.95 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 1/25/2022 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 4,392,936.43 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 3,091,066.65 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 3,090.63 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 4,237.49 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 4,655.38 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 226,991.76 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 933.00 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 4,780.15 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 16,577.60 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 224,398.80 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,378.55 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 9,429.43 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 86,213.98 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 4,973.56 340 FACILITIES 17,416.06 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 34.44 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 34.44 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 103.05 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 34.44 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 103.22 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 68.82 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 2,350.00 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 1,450.62 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 1,650.62 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 326.54 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 1,500.61 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 750.61 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 500.05 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 5,908.02 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 75.05 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 250.61 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 62.55 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 3,654.11 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 1,165.80 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 450.05 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 400.05 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 965.80 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 70.88 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 3,892.47 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 2,629.43 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 5,808.15 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 10,052.18 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 162.55 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 226.42 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 5,854.46 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 4,081.68 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 62.55 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 250.62 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 9,130.46 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 100.09 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 11,920.00 $ 3,773,224.48 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 325,790.48 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 496.53 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 4,142.18 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 141,296.28 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,398.16 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 583.13 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 3,752.80 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,526.28 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 2,184.26 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 53,632.90 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,319.37 340 FACILITIES 8,856.48 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 31.83 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 31.83 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 95.61 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 31.83 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 95.53 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE 11 63.68 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 0.05 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 0.56 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 0.56 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 0.56 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 0.56 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 0.56 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 0.05 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 291.21 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 0.05 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 0.56 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 0.05 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 145.53 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 14.54 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 0.05 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 0.05 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 14.54 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 0.05 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 87.30 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 122.28 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 291.14 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 553.38 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 0.05 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 0.86 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 232.97 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 29.04 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 0.05 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 0.56 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 582.49 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT (0.06) 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 67,013.20 $ 619,711.95 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 4,392,936.43 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 01/04/2022 3:05:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 207725 1/6/2022 009980 SANBORN GWYNETH A, CO COUNTRY LIVE! @ THE MERC 12/04 TEMECULA MUSIC ACADEMY 207726 1/6/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 002185 US POSTAL SERVICE Void Check Amount Paid Check Total 990.00 990.00 0.00 0.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: $990.00 Page:1 apChkLst 01/04/2022 3:05:57PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 501593 1/6/2022 013015 ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW TESTING: FACILITIES 189.00 BACKFLOW, AKA NANETTE SEMAN BACKFLOW TESTING: FACILITIES 324.00 BACKFLOW TESTING: FACILITIES 648.00 1,161.00 501594 1/6/2022 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES JAN STAND BY FEE: POLICE 1,379.17 1,379.17 AFN 501595 1/6/2022 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO DEC DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: PW 28.28 28.28 501596 1/6/2022 021400 AYERS ELECTRIC INC ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: OLD TOWN 200.00 MAINT ELECTRICAL LABOR/INSTALL: PALOMAR 2,700.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: IWTCM 2,850.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: ICE RINK 450.00 6,200.00 501597 1/6/2022 018941 AZTEC LANDSCAPING INC NOV MAINT SVCS: PARKS/SCHOOLS: 9,766.50 9,766.50 PW 501598 1/6/2022 021588 BRAUN PETER, DBA DEC PLANTSCAPE SVCS: TPL 200.00 200.00 TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE 501599 1/6/2022 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM SERVICE CALL: CIVIC CTR 310.00 JAN-MARALARM SYS MONITORING: VAF 6,765.00 ALARM SVC CALL: LIBRARY 80.00 7,155.00 501600 1/6/2022 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & PLUMBING REPAIR: CIVIC CTR 591.17 HVAC INC PLUMBING SVCS: PARKS: PW 395.50 986.67 501601 1/6/2022 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL TEMP FENCING: LONG CANYN CRK 1,392.68 1,392.68 SRVCS PRK Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 01/04/2022 3:05:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 501602 1/6/2022 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL 501603 1/6/2022 012217 DUDEK 501604 1/6/2022 019823 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC 501605 1/6/2022 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING INC 501606 1/6/2022 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 501607 1/6/2022 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 501608 1/6/2022 002925 NAPAAUTO PARTS (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: 161.83 PW FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI 968.72 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW 81.47 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT 1,662.50 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PN 486.03 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI 65.09 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE 212.46 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: ECO DEV 58.34 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: EOC 93.80 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI 1,284.15 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PN 415.34 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI 1,021.69 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW 112.13 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE 197.18 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT 1,318.72 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: F 71.08 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: F 153.75 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT 1,983.35 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP 176.00 10,523.63 NOV CONSTRUCT MGMT SVCS: 16,896.10 FLOOD CNTRL 11- URBAN FOREST MGMT PLAN & INVENT( 30,487.75 47,383.85 ENHANCED COVID CLEANING: CNCL 270.00 CHAMBERS ENHANCED COVID CLEANING: FACILITIE 270.00 540.00 WELDING SVC: CRC POOL: PW 65.00 ON -CALL WELDING: PW PARKS 2,625.00 2,690.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 263.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PW PARKS 24.01 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PD STOREFROr 92.96 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PD STOREFROr 574.23 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PD STOREFROr 633.31 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CHILDRENS ML 78.87 1,666.60 WINDOW PAINTING: SPEC EVENTS: 750.00 750.00 TCSD MISC AUTO PARTS: STREET MAINT: 55.92 55.92 PW Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 01/04/2022 3:05:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 501610 1/6/2022 022599 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC IRRIGATION REPAIRS: DUCK POND 91.46 PARK SOD INSTALLATION: DUCK POND 3,900.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: HARVESTON PAF 88.51 NOV LDSCP MAINT: PW SLOPES 58,553.00 NOV LDSCP MAINT: 1-15/79 LOOP 6,977.00 INSTALL LDSCP DRAIN: LONG CANYON 3,980.00 INSTALL GRANITE PATH: REDHAWK PRK 2,732.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: FIRE STATION 73 180.01 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RIVERTON PARK 382.35 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: HARVESTON SLC 102.13 NOV LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS PV 54,150.00 NOV LDSCP MAINT: CITY FACS 10,150.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RRSP 133.48 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: SADDLEWOOD 249.95 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: TEMEKU PARK 117.85 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RRSP 329.17 Irrigation Repair: Pat Birdsall Sports 512.00 REPLACE PLANT MATERIAL: CIVIC CTR 1,590.00 INSTALL GRANITE: DUCK POND 1,870.00 LDSCP IMPROVEMENTS: SERENA HILLS 2,300.00 148,388.91 501611 1/6/2022 021121 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR Medical Screenings: HR 65.00 65.00 OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 501612 1/6/2022 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE VEH MAINT & REPAIR:PW STREET 48.69 INC MAINT VEHICLE REPAIRS: LAND DEV: PW 360.14 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: PARK RANGER 43.43 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: LAND DEV: PW 90.26 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: CIP: PW 40.59 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: LAND DEV: PW 71.24 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: PARK RANGER 46.86 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: FACILITIES: PV1 40.59 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: BLDG & SAFET 100.98 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: PARK RANGER 278.56 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: PARK RANGER 70.21 VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT: LAND DEV: PW 281.15 1,472.70 501613 1/6/2022 020544 PARKHOUSE TIRE SERVICE TIRE SVC: PW STREETS 941.85 INC TIRE SVC: STREET MAINT: PW 888.46 TIRE SERVICE: STREET MAINT: PW 4,033.37 5,863.68 501614 1/6/2022 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SERVICES: PW: STREETS 85.10 LOCKSMITH SRVC LOCKSMITH SVCS: TVE2 142.50 LOCKSMITH SVCS: TVM 52.19 LOCKSMITH SVCS: CIVIC CTR 228.41 508.20 Page:4 apChkLst 01/04/2022 3:05:57PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 501615 1/6/2022 021620 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC STREET LIGHT: TRAFFIC MAINT: PW 9,516.23 REPLACE TRAFFIC POLE: PW TRAFFIC 6,635.56 16,151.79 501616 1/6/2022 006145 STENO SOLUTIONS TRANSCRIPTION SVCS: TEM SHERIFF 128.16 128.16 TRANSCRIPTION, SRVCS INC 501617 1/6/2022 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE TRIMMING: RIGHT OF WAY: PW 11,970.00 11,970.00 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 276,427.74 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 01/04/2022 3:05:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA 26 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 277,417.74 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 01/06/2022 4:17:53PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 12407 12/29/2021 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT RETIREMENT) 12533 12/28/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE DECEMBER INTERNET SVCS 32380 DEER 12534 11/9/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 002185 US POSTAL SERVICE ZH POSTAGE STAMPS: POLICE DEPT 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER ZH STATE OF THE CITY: POLICE OF, COMMERCE 12537 12/23/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC DEC INTERNET SVCS: DMV 12538 12/23/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC DEC INTERNET SVCS: DMV 12539 12/27/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY NOV 091-085-1632-0 41951 MORAGA RD 12566 12/29/2021 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT SUPPORT 12567 12/29/2021 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAX PAYMENT 12568 12/29/2021 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 12569 12/29/2021 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 12571 1/6/2022 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT SUPPORT 12572 1/6/2022 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT FSA THE ADVANTAGE GROUP PAYMENT 12573 1/6/2022 021301 I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN 106474 PAYMENT 12574 1/6/2022 000194 IC M A RETI REMENT-PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST457 303355 PAYMENT 12575 1/6/2022 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE DISABILITY INS PAYMENT 12576 1/6/2022 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT Amount Paid Check Total 117,778.46 117,778.46 598.63 598.63 60.00 240.00 300.00 100.98 100.98 130.98 130.98 1,535.91 1,535.91 88.29 88.29 14,270.91 14,270.91 53,415.81 53,415.81 1,812.42 1,812.42 482.15 482.15 22,336.74 22,336.74 384.62 384.62 17,115.23 17,115.23 34,364.17 34,364.17 107,699.74 107,699.74 Page-1 apChkLst 01/06/2022 4:17:53PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 12577 1/6/2022 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 13,497.25 13,497.25 SOLUTION 12578 1/6/2022 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT 344.39 344.39 SOLUTION PAYMENT 12579 1/6/2022 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT 2,610.94 2,610.94 SOLUTION PAYMENT 12580 1/6/2022 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 162,717.12 162,717.12 PREMIUM 207727 1/6/2022 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: 207.54 PW PARKING LOT BASE MATERIAL: OLD TO1 867.63 1,075.17 207728 1/6/2022 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES MISC OFC SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW 81.50 INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: HR 57.62 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO TECH 92.37 STAND & SWITCH: MOBILE CART: INFO l 477.40 708.89 207729 1/6/2022 020691 ANN M HOWELL, DBAANN GRAPHIC DSGN: CITYWIDE 2,909.00 2,909.00 HOWELL DESIGN NEWSLETTER 207730 1/6/2022 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 2,446.88 2,446.88 207731 1/6/2022 007065 B&H PHOTO & ELECTRONICS MISC AV EQUIPMENT. PEG SUPPLIES 118.26 CORP MISC CABLES: MOBILE MEDIA CART PE( 420.37 MISC AV EQUIPMENT: PEG SUPPLIES 1,334.00 MISC AV EQUIPMENT: PEG SUPPLIES 149.46 2,022.09 207732 1/6/2022 011954 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 98.72 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 134.82 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 20.12 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 180.92 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 310.43 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 41.09 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 708.32 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 16.84 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 36.40 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 6.35 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD 54.34 1,608.35 207733 1/6/2022 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL LETTERMAN JACKET: RUSSO: TCSD 92.44 PRODUCTS INC STAFF UNIFORMS: INFO TECH 78.23 170.67 207734 1/6/2022 001323 BLUETRITON BRANDS INC, 11/15-12/14 WTR DLVRY SVC: TVE2 51.85 DBA READYREFRESH 11 /11 -12/10 WTR DLVRY SVC: FOC 180.88 232.73 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 01/06/2022 4:17:53PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 207735 1/6/2022 003138 CAL MAT, DBAVULCAN MATERIALS CO 207736 1/6/2022 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE, ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS 207737 1/6/2022 021851 CALIF NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP, DBA SO CALIF NEWS GROUP 207738 1/6/2022 004462 CDW LLC, DBACDW GOVERNMENT LLC 207739 1/6/2022 004837 CHERRY VLY FEED & PET SUPPLY 207740 1/6/2022 016530 COMMUNITY MISSION OF HOPE (Continued) Description ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PV1 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PV1 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: COLE, T LEGAL PUBLICATIONS: CITY CLERK OCT PUBLIC NTC AD: PLANNING MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO TECH ETHERNET SWITCHES: TRAFFIC WIFI EXPANSION: FOC: INFO TECH MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO TECI MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO TECI ADOBE RENEWAL: INFO TECH MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO TECI K9 FOOD: TEM SHERIFF CDBG REIMBURSEMENT. JUL - SEP'21 207741 1/6/2022 022709 COMPUTERSHARE MRAP MORTGAGE GRANT RECIPIENT MORTGAGE SRV INC, 1/3 SPECIALIZED LOAN SRV LLC MRAP MORTGAGE GRANT RECIPIENT 2, 207742 1/6/2022 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 PEG MOBILE MEDIA CART: TELEVISION 207743 1/6/2022 005766 DATA BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 2021 Tax Forms: Finance Dept 207744 1/6/2022 012600 DAVID EVANS AND DSGN CONSULT SVCS: PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATES INC COURTS 21- DSGN SVCS: RECYCLED WATER PROJE 207745 1/6/2022 022577 DELIRIUM MUSICUM THEATER PERFORMANCE: 01/08/22 207746 1/6/2022 016839 EHS INTERNATIONAL INC EMPLOYEE SAFETY PRGM: RISK MGMT EMPLOYEE SAFETY PRGM: RISK MGMT 207747 1/6/2022 021859 EXP US SERVICES INC CONSULT SVCS: SANTAGERTRUDIS CRK TRAIL 207748 1/6/2022 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT Amount Paid 512.32 520.14 347.14 95.00 341.20 2,069.00 680.14 88,965.89 1,622.07 216.41 246.62 5,790.84 679.11 140.05 384.00 1,558.71 1,558.71 437.14 296.47 2,813.00 5,111.00 7,600.00 4,235.00 2,765.00 10,024.39 1,708.84 Check Total 1,379.60 95.00 2,410.20 98,201.08 140.05 384.00 3,117.42 437.14 296.47 7,924.00 7,600.00 7,000.00 10,024.39 1,708.84 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 01/06/2022 4:17:53PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 207749 1/6/2022 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: PEG: LIFT GATE 207750 1/6/2022 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK AKA STTLMNT: NUTCRACKER BALLET THEATRE, CO AND BALLET 12/17-12/23 THEATER 207751 1/6/2022 019016 FLEETCREW INC, DBA DIESEL ENGINE FILTER CLEANING: FLEETCREW STREETS: DIESEL ENGINE FILTER CLEANING: STREETS: 207752 1/6/2022 022726 FORENSIC NURSING OF SART EXAM: TEM SHERIFF SOCAL INC 207753 1/6/2022 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103 207754 1/6/2022 014865 FREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA, RECOGNITION PROGRAM: HR CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE PADFOILIO: PLAN 207755 1/6/2022 019721 GOVCONNECTION INC COMPUTER REPLACEMENT: INFO TECH HARD DRIVES: LIBRARY: INFO TECH 207756 1/6/2022 020725 GRANICUS LLC, DBA ECOMMENT MODULE: INFO TECH GRANICUS Amount Paid Check Total 154.00 62,869.01 534.95 459.95 800.00 194.39 122.23 837.59 11, 078.30 3,541.99 1,485.48 207757 1/6/2022 003198 HOME DEPOT REFUND DBL CREDIT TAKEN 229.23 207758 1/6/2022 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA RECOGNITION PRGM: EDWARDS, M. 239.25 TEMECULA TROPHY&DES REMEMBRANCE BENCH: DUCK POND 777.56 CREDIT: -194.39 ENGRAVING SVCS: TEAM PACE 40.78 207759 1/6/2022 019884 LEONIDA BUILDERS INC STP NTC: RED HAWK SVCS: PW08-04 -184,672.73 SANTA GERTRUDIS CRK PEDESTRIAN EXT 265,810.67 STP NTC: RED HAWK SVCS: PW08-04 -63,489.10 207760 1/6/2022 010490 LISA SAPINKOPF ARTISTS, AKA Theater Performance: JAN 8, 2022 1,900.00 LISA SAPINKOPF 207761 1/6/2022 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 337.25 ATHACO INC CITY STREET SIGNAGE: STREET MAINT: PW 484.88 207763 1/6/2022 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL HMO PAYMENT 14,559.13 COMPANY 207764 1/6/2022 020349 NETFILE INC E-FILING SYSTEM: CITY CLERK 5,260.00 154.00 62,869.01 994.90 800.00 194.39 959.82 14,620.29 1,485.48 229.23 863.20 17,648.84 1,900.00 822.13 14,559.13 5,260.00 Page:4 apChkLst 01/06/2022 4:17:53PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 207765 1/6/2022 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: FRENCH VALLEY: PW: 560.64 PARK CIP ASSOCIATION: FRENCH VALLEY: PW: CII 707.93 ASSOCIATION: FRENCH VALLEY: PW: CII 681.01 ASSOCIATION: FRENCH VALLEY: PW: CII 521.05 2,470.63 207766 1/6/2022 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS OFFICE SUPPLIES: CIP: PW 47.95 47.95 DIV 207767 1/6/2022 003663 PECHANGA BAND OF NOV PROF SRVCS: S.GERTRUDIS 307.84 307.84 LUISENO, MISSION INDIANS CRK, PW 08-0 207768 1/6/2022 010338 POOL AND ELECTRICAL, VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 148.30 148.30 PRODUCTS INC 207769 1/6/2022 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 191.35 191.35 INC, DBA LEGALSHIELD 207770 1/6/2022 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 12/14 CREDIT: UNIFORM RENTAL: -122.60 SUPPLY STREETS: P 12/14 UNIFORM RENTAL: PARKS: PW 186.19 12/2 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CI\j 95.70 11/23 UNIFORM RENTAL: PARKS: PW 65.49 12/09 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: Cl 95.70 11/30 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: F( 9.70 UNIFORM SVCS: PW MAINT 51.24 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT 67.34 448.76 207771 1/6/2022 002012 R D O EQUIPMENT COMPANY MISC EQUIPMENT PARTS: STREET 851.36 851.36 MAINT 207772 1/6/2022 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 9/23-10/20 LAW ENFORCEMENT 2,587,093.71 2,587,093.71 DEPT 207773 1/6/2022 012984 ROTARY CLUB OF OLD TOWN HOLIDAY DECOR: CIVIC CTR 640.00 640.00 207774 1/6/2022 015364 SEASIDE ICE LLC, DBA ICE OUTDOOR SKATING RINK: TCSD 18,125.00 18,125.00 AMERICA 207775 1/6/2022 013376 SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES EMERGENCY REPAIRS: TPL 1,098.00 INC, SSD SYSTEMS EMERGENCY REPAIRS: TPL 6,193.07 EMEGENCY MAINT SRVCS: LIBRARY 597.00 BATTERY REPLACEMENT: LIBRARY 2,141.52 10,029.59 207776 1/6/2022 015873 SESAC BROADCAST MUSIC LIC FEE: OLD 2,430.00 2,430.00 TOWN: TCSD 207777 1/6/2022 013695 SHRED -IT US JV LLC, DBA: DOCUMENT SHRED SVCS: POLICE 235.00 SHRED -IT USA LLC SUBSTATIONS 11/17 DOC SHRED SVCS: POLICE 41.13 276.13 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 01/06/2022 4:17:53PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 207778 1/6/2022 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 207779 1/6/2022 019250 ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC LLC (Continued) Description PEST CTRL SVCS: SENIOR CENTER PEST CTRL SVCS: WEST WING PEST CONTROL SRVCS: AQUATICS PEST CTRL SVCS: DUCK POND PEST CONTROL SVCS: MPSC: CIP: PW PEST CTRL SVCS: CRC PEST CTRL SVCS: MUSEUM AT SAM HIC PEST CTRL SVCS: HARVESTON PARK PEST CTRL SVCS: TCC PEST CONTROL: FOC PEST CTRL SVCS: TCC PEST CTRL SVCS: MRC PEST CTRL SVCS: TVE2 PEST CTRL SVCS: THEATER PEST CTRL SVCS: HARVESTON PARK PEST CONTROL: PW: PARKS PEST CONTROL: PW: PARKS PEST CTRL SVCS: LIBRARY PEST CTRL SVCS: WOLF CREEK PARK PEST CTRL SVCS: SAM HICKS PEST CONTROL: PW PARKS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT: PW: STREETS 207782 1/6/2022 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT COMPANY 207783 1/6/2022 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAYMENT 207784 1/6/2022 021120 STAR PRODUCTS LLC IC RELEASE: STREET MAINTENANCE 207785 1/6/2022 008164 SUN CITY GRANITE INC GRANITE STONE ENGRAVING: PARKS 207786 1/6/2022 010924 TAND D COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL CABLING SERVICES: CIVIC INC CTR 207787 1/6/2022 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION MEMBERSHIP DUES PAYMENT 207788 1/6/2022 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & MISC SMALL TOOLS: STREET MAINT: SUPPLY PW 207789 1/6/2022 017415 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION EMERG ELEVATOR SRVCS: PRKG STRUCTURE EMERG ELEVATOR SVCS: PRKNG STRU Amount Paid Check Total 29.00 40.00 59.00 49.00 9,650.00 90.00 42.00 94.00 299.00 52.00 246.00 70.00 56.00 90.00 95.00 70.00 94.00 180.00 49.00 94.00 94.00 4,950.00 9,662.64 1.323.31 1,019.14 3,420.00 1,132.65 5,058.22 556.80 531.38 226.12 11, 542.00 4,950.00 9,662.64 1,323.31 1,019.14 3,420.00 1,132.65 5,058.22 556.80 757.50 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 01/06/2022 4:17:53PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 207790 1/6/2022 022102 UNITED PARCEL SERVICES INC 207791 1/6/2022 021957 US AIR CONDITIONING, DISTRIBUTORS LLC 207792 1/6/2022 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 207793 1/6/2022 022692 VERSA PRODUCTS INC 207794 1/6/2022 001890 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 207795 1/6/2022 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC CONSULTING INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total EXPRESS MAIL SRVCS: FINANCE 38.10 EXPRESS MAIL SRVCS: INFO TECH 133.09 EXPRESS MAIL SRVCS: GIS: INFO TECH 9.75 180.94 HVAC SUPPLIES: TVE2 237.29 237.29 11 /11 -12/10 TASK FORCE TABLETS 487.71 487.71 POLICE ERGONOMIC EQUIPMENT: RISK MGMT 461.61 461.61 FRONT DOOR HARDWARE: MPSC 2,019.18 2,019.18 NOV CONSTRCTN MGMT SVCS: FIBER 3,100.00 3,100.00 OPTIC Grand total for UNION BANK: 3,495,806.74 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 01/06/2022 4:17:53PM CITY OF TEMECULA 86 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 3,495,806.74 Page:8 Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Authorize the Submittal of an Application to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for Funding from the SB1383 Local Assistance Grant Program PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AUTHORIZE THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES RECYCLING AND RECOVERY (CALRECYCLE) FOR FUNDING FROM THE SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM BACKGROUND: On January 4, 2022, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) released the SB1383 Local Assistance Grant Program pursuant to Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016. This non-competitive grant program will provide one-time funding to local jurisdictions to assist with the implementation of regulation requirements associated with SB 1383. In September 2016, Governor Edmund Brown Jr., set methane emissions reduction targets for California, under SB 1383 in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants to reduce organic waste disposal 50% by 2020 and 75% by 2025, and to implement an edible food recovery program to distribute at least 20% of currently disposed surplus food by 2025. Effective January 1, 2022, all jurisdictions will need to provide organic waste collection services to all residents and businesses and recycle these materials to generate biofuel, electricity or make soil amendments. Local governments must also meet certain procurement requirements to use recycled organic products, implement and monitor an edible food recovery program, provide inspection and enforcement, and maintain recordkeeping that demonstrates compliance with the law. The SB1383 Local Assistance Grant Program will provide one-time funding to local jurisdictions based on a per capita calculation to assist with the implementation of SB1383 compliance measures. The City of Temecula is eligible to receive up to the funding estimate of $148,929. Eligible activities include capacity planning, collection, edible food recovery, public education and outreach, enforcement and inspection, procurement requirements, record keeping, administration, consulting services, and personnel. Applicant must submit their applications by February 1, 2022, and are required to upload an authorizing Resolution to the Grants Management System (GMS) by or before March 1, 2022 to be considered for first round funding. Applicants must also identify the status of adopting an enforceable ordinance, pursuant to Section 18981.2 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. CalRecycle will consider funding recommendations and conditionally approve grant awards on April 1, 2022 (tentatively). FISCAL IMPACT: The requested program grant funds in the amount of $148,929 are due to be advanced to the local jurisdiction to offset the costs to perform and implement regulation requirements. Grant Program Funds will be programmed in the appropriate Annual Operating Budget (AOB) line items upon receipt. There is no fiscal impact to submit the application. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AUTHORIZE THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES RECYCLING AND RECOVERY (CALRECYCLE) FOR FUNDING FROM THE SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs (grants) in furtherance of the State of California's (State) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the State thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety and the environment; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of this authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management of the grants; and WHEREAS, CalRecycle grant application procedures require, and are not limited to, an applicant's governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Temecula authorizes the submittal of an application to CalRecycle for the SB1383 Local Assistance Grant Program; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Temecula all grant documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant program or project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these authorizations remain in effect from the date of adoption of this resolution, up to and including the grant term end date of September 2, 2024 to December 31, 2024, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Purchase and Sale Agreement for Acquisition of Certain Property Interests and Loss of Ground Lease Rent and Interests for Billboard on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, 910-060- 015 in Connection with I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II, PW16-01 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Kendra Hannah-Meistrell, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND LARCHMONT PARK, LLC IN CONNECTION WITH THE I-I5/FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS — PHASE II (PORTIONS OF APN'S 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, 910-060-015) 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute all necessary documents, including those in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report, and take all necessary actions to effectuate the purchase of the approximate 52,090 square foot fee area from and the loss of ground lease rent and interests of owners in and to the billboard on the real property located on the vacant real property located on the west side of Jackson Avenue in the City of Murrieta, California, and identified as APN's 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, 910- 060-015. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula (City), in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), seeks to construct the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II (Phase II) to alleviate traffic congestion and improve operational efficiency within the limits of the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements Project. As part of Phase II, the City proposes to construct a two-lane northbound collector/distributor system along I-15 from the Winchester Road/I-15 interchange northerly on -ramps to just north of the I-15/I-215 junction with connectors to I-15 and I-215. The Phase II project requires the acquisition of privately -owned lands to accommodate the proposed public improvements. On May 28, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-30 approving a Cooperative Agreement, Agreement 08-1667, with Caltrans for the design of Phase II. Pursuant to Agreement 08-1667, City is the implementing agency for right of way and is responsible for acquisition of the property interests needed for Phase II. In addition, Phase II also requires the cooperation of the City of Murrieta ("Murrieta"). The City and Murrieta entered into that certain Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the City of Murrieta in Connection with the French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements Project — Phase II, which was executed by the City of Temecula on May 13, 2021 and by the City of Murrieta on July 28, 2021 ("Temecula-Murrieta Cooperative Agreement"). Pursuant to the Temecula-Murrieta Cooperative Agreement, the City and Murrieta set forth their agreement to cooperate on right-of-way issues in connection with Phase II. Murrieta agreed that the City may acquire properties located in the City of Murrieta in connection with Phase II. Phase II requires the acquisition in fee of an approximate 52,090 square foot portion ("Subject Fee Property") of that certain vacant real property located on the west side of Jackson Avenue near Fig Street in the City of Murrieta, California, and identified as APNs 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910- 060-003, 910-060-009, 910-060-015 ("Larger Parcel") for public use, namely public street and highway purposes, retaining wall construction, drainage, public utilities, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the City's proposed construction of Phase II. Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company is the record fee owners of said real property. A billboard structure is located on the property line of the parcel identified as APN 910-060-002 and will be affected by the construction of Phase II. The owners of the Larger Parcel receive rental income from the billboard's north advertising side based on a ground lease for said billboard. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, on August 10, 2021, the City Council set just compensation for the approximate 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property, the loss of ground lease rent for the affected billboard, and all interests of Larchmont Park, LLC in and to the subject billboard (collectively "Subject Property Interests") at the fair market value as determined by the City's independent appraiser based on an October 7, 2020 date of value. The City Council also authorized the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to make offers and negotiate the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The City and its consultant, Overland, Pacific & Cutler, hand -delivered a written offer dated October 11, 2021 to Larchmont Park, LLC to purchase the Subject Property Interests at the fair market value established by the City's independent appraiser. The parties negotiated in good faith the City's purchase of the Subject Property Interests, including severance damages to the remainder portions of the Larger Parcel. As of December 14, 2021, the parties had not reached an agreement for the City's purchase of the Subject Property Interests. On December 14, 2021, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a hearing in accordance with the Eminent Domain Law (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq.) and adopted Resolution No. 2021-70, A Resolution of the City Council of Temecula Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II (Certain Property Interests on APNs 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, & 910-060-015). The parties resumed their negotiations after the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-70, and have reached an agreement on the terms of the City's purchase of the Subject Property Interests, subject to ratification by the City Council. The Purchase and Sale Agreement describes the details of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. It provides that the City Staff will present to the City Council for approval a Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 2021-70 within thirty (30) business days of the close of escrow. During negotiations, Larchmont Park, LLC informed the City that BWTB Jackson Street, LLC has an unrecorded interest in and to an approximate 23,076 square foot portion of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property located on APN 910-060-003 and an approximate 13,031 square foot portion of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property located on APN 190-060-009. BTWB Jackson Street, LLC was involved in the negotiations. The total purchase price the City will pay for the Subject Property Interests is the sum of $1,600,498.00 (One Million Six Hundred Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Eight Dollars) ("Purchase Price") for the fair market value of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property described in the Exhibits to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the compensation for the impact of Phase II on the remainder portions of the Larger Parcel, impact of the acquisition of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property and Phase II on the subject billboard, including loss of the ground lease rent in connection with said subject billboard, and any and all damages related thereto. The total Purchase Price reflects a negotiated agreement for the value of the of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property for the total compensation of $781,350.00. The difference between the total Purchase Price of $1,600,498.00 and said $781,350.00 represents the compensation for all interests of Larchmont Park, LLC in and to the billboard impacted by Phase II, including the ground lease, loss of ground lease rent, and severance damages for the impact of Phase II and the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The Purchase and Sale Agreement provides that Larchmont Park, LLC is responsible for any apportionment or allocation of the Purchase Price if required for any separately held interests that may exist in the Subject Fee Property, including any compensation due by Larchmont Park, LLC to BWTB Jackson Street, LLC in connection with any interest that BWTB Jackson Street, LLC may have in connection with any portions of the Larger Parcel. BWTB Jackson Street, LLC will submit a Consent and Disclaimer of Interest into Escrow as part of this transaction. Accordingly, the Purchase Price represents the total all-inclusive just compensation for the Subject Property Interests, the compensation for the impact of Phase II on the remainder portions of the Larger Parcel, impact of the acquisition of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property and Phase II on the subject billboard, including loss of the ground lease rent in connection with said subject billboard, and any and all damages related thereto. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests were studied as an integral part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration approved for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements Project. The findings made by the City Council at its meeting on February 23, 2010 in approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration are the appropriate findings for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. A re -validation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved on July 9, 2021. In connection with the attached Agreement, City staff reviewed all of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Phase II project, including, but not limited to, the re -validation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the initial environmental study, the mitigation monitoring program and agenda report related to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Phase II project and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. FISCAL IMPACT: The I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2022-26. The project is funded with Measure S, TUMF (WRCOG), TUMF (CETAP/RCTC), SAFETEA- LU, STIP, and INFRA Grant. The City will pay $1,600,498.00 for the City's purchase of the partial fee acquisition and the loss of lease rent for the billboard plus any escrow -related costs, which are not expected to exceed $15,000. Sufficient funds are available in the Project accounts. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Purchase and Sale Agreement with Exhibits Exhibit "A" — Legal Description of Subject Fee Property (Caltrans Parcel 24624-1) Exhibit `B" — Depiction of Subject Fee Property (Caltrans Parcel 24624-1) Exhibit `B-1" — Rough Depiction of Subject Billboard Impacted by Phase II Exhibit "C" — Form of Grant Deed Exhibit "D" — Form of Consent and Disclaimer of Interest of BWTB Jackson Street, LLC 3. Property Location 4. Project Description 5. Project Location RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND LARCHMONT PARK, LLC IN CONNECTION WITH THE I-15/FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II (PORTIONS OF APN'S 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, 910-060-015) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. A. The City of Temecula (City), in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), seeks to construct the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II (Phase II) to alleviate traffic congestion and improve operational efficiency within the limits of the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements Project (Project). City completed Phase I of the Project, which was designed to provide interim relief by widening the existing southbound off -ramp at Winchester Road, construction of the southbound off -ramp at the French Valley Parkway and construction of the westbound portion of French Valley Parkway between the new off -ramp and Jefferson Avenue. As part of Phase II, City proposes to construct a two-lane northbound collector/distributor system along I-15 from the Winchester Road/I-15 interchange northerly on -ramps to just north of the I-15/I-215 junction with connectors to I-15 and I-215. B. Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company is the record owner of that certain vacant real property located on the west side of Jackson Avenue in the City of Murrieta, California, and identified as Riverside County Tax Assessor's Parcel Number 910-020- 077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009 and 910-060-015 ("Larger Parcel"). The Larger Parcel is approximately 209,944 square feet (4.82 acres) in size. The Larger Parcel is not improved with any buildings. An outdoor advertising structure/ billboard ("subject billboard") is located on the property line of the portion of the Larger Parcel identified as APN 910-060-002 that abuts the adjacent parcel identified as APN 910-060-004. Seller receives income from the subject billboard's north advertising side based on a ground lease dated December 19, 2006 between Lamar Advertising Company (successor to the interests of Lamar Companies) and Judith A. Blake. Seller is the successor to the interests of Judith A. Blake in connection with said ground lease. Said ground lease is a month -to -month lease and provides for a flat rent of $1,200 per month or $14,400 per year. APNs 910-020-077 and 910-060-002 are herein collectively called the "Northerly Parcels" and APNs 910-060-003 and 910-060-009 are herein collectively called the "Southerly Parcels". C. Phase II is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Years 2022-26. D. On May 28, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-30 approving a Cooperative Agreement, Agreement 08-1667, with Caltrans for the design of Phase II. Pursuant to Agreement 08-1667, City is the implementing agency for right of way and is responsible for acquisition of the property interests needed for Phase II. E. Phase 11 also requires the cooperation of the City of Murrieta ("Murrieta"). The City and Murrieta entered into that certain Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the City of Murrieta in Connection with the French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements Project — Phase II, which was executed by the City of Temecula on May 13, 2021 and by the City of Murrieta on July 28, 2021 ("Temecula-Murrieta Cooperative Agreement"). Pursuant to the Temecula-Murrieta Cooperative Agreement, the City and Murrieta set forth their agreement to cooperate on right-of-way issues in connection with Phase 11. Murrieta agreed and acknowledged that the City could acquire property located in the City of Murrieta. The City and Murrieta also agreed and acknowledged that each City may exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire real property for a public use if each City meets all legal requirements, including the payment of just compensation to the owner or into the court for the benefit of the owner. (California Constitution, Article 1, Section 19). F. Phase II requires the acquisition in fee of an approximate 52,090 square foot portion of the Larger Parcel ("Subject Fee Property") for public use, namely public street and highway purposes, retaining wall construction, drainage, public utilities, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the City's proposed construction of Phase 11. The acquisition of the Subject Fee Property and construction of Phase II will impact the subject billboard and Larchmont Park LLC's interest in and to the ground lease in connection with the subject billboard. The approximate 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property, the loss of ground lease rent for the affected billboard, and all interests of Larchmont Park, LLC in and to the subject billboard are referred to collectively as the "Subject Property Interests". G. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2, on August 10, 2021, the City Council set just compensation for the Subject Property Interests at the fair market value as determined by the City's independent appraiser based on an October 7, 2020 date of value. The City Council also authorized the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to make offers and negotiate the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. H. The City and its consultant, Overland, Pacific & Cutler, hand -delivered a written offer dated October 11, 2021 to Larchmont Park, LLC to purchase the Subject Property Interests at the fair market value established by the City's independent appraiser. 1. The parties negotiated in good faith the City's purchase of the Subject Property Interests, including severance damages to the remainder portions of the Larger Parcel. As of December 14, 2021, the parties had not reached an agreement for the City's purchase of the Subject Property Interests. Accordingly, based on the timing of Phase II and status of negotiations, on December 14, 2021, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a hearing in accordance with the Eminent Domain Law (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq.) and adopted Resolution No. 2021-70, A Resolution of the City Council of Temecula Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in N Connection with the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II (Certain Property Interests on APNs 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, & 910-060-015). J. The parties resumed their negotiations after the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-70, and have reached an agreement on the terms of the City's purchase of the Subject Property Interests, subject to ratification by the City Council. The Purchase and Sale Agreement describes the details of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. It provides that the City Staff will present to the City Council for approval a Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 2021- 70 within thirty (30) business days of the close of escrow. K. The total purchase price the City will pay for the Subject Property Interests is the sum of $1,600,498.00 (One Million Six Hundred Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Eight Dollars) ("Purchase Price") for the fair market value of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property described in the Exhibits to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the compensation for the impact of Phase II on the remainder portions of the Larger Parcel, impact of the acquisition of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property and Phase II on the subject billboard, including loss of the ground lease rent in connection with said subject billboard, and any and all damages related thereto. The total Purchase Price reflects a negotiated agreement for the value of the of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property for the total compensation of $781,350.00. The difference between the total Purchase Price of $1,600,498.00 and said $781,350.00 represents the compensation for all interests of Larchmont Park, LLC in and to the billboard impacted by Phase II, including the ground lease, loss of ground lease rent, and severance damages for the impact of Phase II and the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. The Purchase and Sale Agreement provides that Larchmont Park, LLC is responsible for any apportionment or allocation of the Purchase Price if required for any separately held interests that may exist in the Subject Fee Property, including any compensation due by Larchmont Park, LLC to BWTB Jackson Street, LLC in connection with any interest that BWTB Jackson Street, LLC may have in connection with any portions of the Larger Parcel. BWTB Jackson Street, LLC will submit a Consent and Disclaimer of Interest into Escrow as part of this transaction. Accordingly, the Purchase Price represents the total all-inclusive just compensation for the Subject Property Interests, the compensation for the impact of Phase II on the remainder portions of the Larger Parcel, impact of the acquisition of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property and Phase II on the subject billboard, including loss of the ground lease rent in connection with said subject billboard, and any and all damages related thereto. L. At its meeting of February 23, 2010, the City Council approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements Project. The City Council found that based on the record before it (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment that cannot be adequately and feasibly mitigated; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. The City duly filed the Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA. Section 2. Approval of Purchase and Sale Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions between the City of Temecula and Larchmont Park, LLC in Connection with I 15/French Valley Parkway 3 Improvements - Phase II (Portions of APNs 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060- 009 and 910-060-015). Section 3. Environmental Analysis. The environmental effects of the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests were studied as an integral part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration approved for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements Project. The findings made by the City Council at its meeting on February 23, 2010 in approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration are the appropriate findings for the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. A re- validation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved on July 9, 2021. In connection with the attached Agreement, City staff reviewed all of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with the Phase II project, including, but not limited to, the re -validation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the initial environmental study, the mitigation monitoring program and agenda report relating to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, City staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Phase II project and that the City has obtained no new information of substantial importance that would require further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the appropriate findings with respect to the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. Section 4. City Manager's Authority. The City Manager is authorized to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached. A copy of the final Agreement shall be placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Manager (or the City Manager's designee), is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to take all actions necessary and convenient to carry out and implement the Agreement, and to administer the City's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be performed under the Agreement, including but not limited to, execution of the Certificate of Acceptance, escrow instructions, and other similar agreements and documents as contemplated by or described in the Agreement or as necessary and convenient to effectuate the transaction contemplated therein. Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND LARCHMONT PARK, LLC IN CONNECTION WITH THE I-15/FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II (PORTIONS OF APNs 910-020- 077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009 and 910-060-015) This Agreement for Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions between the City of Temecula and Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company in Connection with I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II (Portions of APNs 910-020-077, 910-060- 002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009 and 910-060-015) ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("Buyer" or "City") and Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Seller") and constitutes an agreement to purchase and sell certain real property interests between Seller and Buyer and the joint escrow instructions directed to First American Title Company ("Escrow Holder"). Seller and Buyer are referred to below collectively as the "Parties". The Agreement is effective on the date it is fully executed by the Parties ("Effective Date"). RECITALS A. Seller is the record owner of that certain vacant real property located on the west side of Jackson Avenue near Fig Street in the City of Murrieta, California, and identified as Riverside County Tax Assessor's Parcel Number 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910- 060-009 and 910-060-015 ("Larger Parcel"). The Larger Parcel is approximately 209,944 square feet (4.82 acres) in size. The Larger Parcel is not improved with any buildings. An outdoor advertising structure/ billboard ("subject billboard") is located on the property line of the portion of the Larger Parcel identified as APN 910-060-002 that abuts the adjacent parcel identified as APN 910-060-004. Seller receives income from the subject billboard's north advertising side based on a ground lease dated December 19, 2006 between Lamar Advertising Company (successor to the interests of Lamar Companies) and Judith A. Blake. Seller is the successor to the interests of Judith A. Blake in connection with said ground lease. Said ground lease is a month - to -month lease and provides for a flat rent of $1,200 per month or $14,400 per year. APNs 910- 020-077 and 910-060-002 are herein collectively called the "Northerly Parcels" and APNs 910- 060-003 and 910-060-009 are herein collectively called the "Southerly Parcels". B. City, in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans"), seeks to construct the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II ("Phase II") to improve traffic congestion and improve operational efficiency within the limits of the I-I5/French Valley Parkway Improvements Project ("Project"). City completed Phase I of the Project, which was designed to provide interim relief by widening the existing southbound off -ramp at Winchester Road, construction of the southbound off -ramp at the French Valley Parkway and construction of the westbound portion of French Valley Parkway between the new off -ramp and Jefferson Avenue. As part of Phase II, City proposes to construct a two-lane northbound collector/distributor system along 1-15 from the Winchester Road/I-15 interchange northerly on -ramps to just north of the I- 15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215. -1- 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc C. Pursuant to Cooperative Agreement 08-1667 ("Cooperative Agreement"), City is the implementing agency for right of way and is responsible for acquisition of the property interests needed for Phase II. D. Phase II also requires the cooperation of the City of Murrieta ("Murrieta"). The City and Murrieta entered into that certain Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the City of Murrieta in Connection with the French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements Project — Phase 11, which was executed by the City of Temecula on May 13, 2021 and by the City of Murrieta on July 28, 2021 ("Temecula-Murrieta Cooperative Agreement"). Pursuant to the Temecula-Murrieta Cooperative Agreement, the City and Murrieta set forth their agreement to cooperate on right-of-way issues in connection with Phase II. They recognized that public agencies may jointly exercise any power common to them pursuant to Government Code Section 6502 and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.140(b). Government Code Section 6502 provides that "[i]f authorized by their legislative or governing bodies, two or more public agencies by agreement may jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties". California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.140(b) provides that "[t]wo or more public agencies may enter into an agreement for the joint exercise of their respective powers of eminent domain, whether or not possessed in common, for the acquisition of property as a single parcel." The City and Murrieta also agreed and acknowledged that each City may exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire real property for a public use if each City meets all legal requirements, including the payment of just compensation to the owner or into the court for the benefit of the owner. (California Constitution, Article 1, Section 19). E. City extended to Seller a written offer dated October 11, 2021 pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2 to purchase in fee an approximate 52,090 square foot portion of the Larger Parcel ("Subject Fee Property") for public use, namely public street and highway purposes, retention wall construction, drainage, public utilities, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the City's proposed construction of Phase II. The approximate 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property that the City seeks to acquire in fee is identified as Caltrans Parcel No. 24624-1 and described more particularly on Exhibit "A" hereto and depicted on Exhibit "B" hereto, which are incorporated herein by this reference. The approximate 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property consists of the following areas from four of the parcels that are part of the Larger Parcel: (1) An approximate 3,044 square foot portion of APN 910-020-077 and an approximate 12,939 square foot portion of APN 910-060-002 comprising an approximate 15,983 square foot portion of the Northerly Parcels. (2) An approximate 23,076 square foot portion of APN 910-060-003 and an approximate 13,031 square foot portion of APN 910-060-009 comprising an approximate 36,107 square foot portion of the Southerly Parcels. A rough depiction of the subject billboard impacted by Phase II is attached as Exhibit "B-1" hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The City's offer letter also included compensation for the impact of Phase 11 on the subject billboard. It is the understanding of the Parties that the subject billboard cannot be relocated due to the City of Murrieta's sign regulations and thus the lease for -2- 1 1086-0204\26 l 0497v2.doc the subject billboard for which Seller receives rent will be impacted by Phase II and the acquisition of the Subject Fee Property. F. The Parties negotiated City's purchase in fee of the Subject Fee Property. During negotiations, Larchmont Park, LLC informed City that BWTB Jackson Street, LLC may have an interest in portions of the Larger Parcel. Any such interest of BWTB Jackson Street, LLC, however, is not recorded against the parcels comprising the Larger Parcel. The Parties continued their negotiations, but, as of December 14, 2014, the Parties had not reached an agreement regarding the terms of City's purchase of the Subject Fee Property, improvements thereon, and impact to the ground lease in connection with the subject billboard. Based on the timing of Phase II and critical right-of-way certification deadlines, it was necessary for the City Council of the City of Temecula to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition of the Subject Fee Property by eminent domain. G. On December 14, 2021, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a hearing in accordance with the Eminent Domain Law (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq.) and adopted Resolution No. 2021-70, A Resolution of the City Council of Temecula Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements —Phase II (Certain Property Interests on APNs 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009, & 910-060-015). Pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-70, the City Council found that the City is authorized to acquire the Subject Fee Property by eminent domain for public street and state highway purposes, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, including, but not limited to, public street, highway, retention walls, drainage, and utilities in connection with the proposed construction of Phase II by virtue of the authority conferred on the City by Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution, California Government Code Sections 6502, 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404, California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to Sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.140, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law. H. After the adoption of the Resolution No. 2021-70, the Parties resumed their negotiations and have reached an agreement, subject to ratification by the City Council, regarding the terms of City's purchase of the Subject Fee Property, any improvements thereon, and impact of the acquisition of the Subject Fee Property and Phase II on the remainder portions of the Larger Parcel and on the ground lease in connection with the subject billboard. I. Seller desires to sell to City the Subject Fee Property, and City desires to purchase the Subject Fee Property, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals and for other valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, City and Seller agree as follows. 1. Purchase and Sale. On the Close of Escrow, as defined in Section 2 below, Seller agrees to sell in fee the Subject Fee Property (Caltrans Parcel 24624-1) described in Exhibit "A" and roughly shown on Exhibit "B" to the City and City agrees to purchase the Subject Fee Property in fee from Seller on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. -3- 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc 2. Opening and Close of Escrow. Within five (5) business days after the Effective Date, City will deliver a copy of the fully -executed Agreement to Escrow Holder. Opening of Escrow means the date on which Escrow Holder receives a copy of the fully -executed Agreement. The Parties can execute the Agreement in counterparts as set forth in Section 20.d. below. This Agreement shall serve as the instructions to Escrow Holder for consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. City and Seller agree to execute such additional and supplementary escrow instructions as may be appropriate to enable Escrow Holder to comply with the terms of this Agreement; provided, however, that in the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the terms and provisions of any supplementary escrow instructions, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. For the purposes of this Agreement, "Close of Escrow" shall be the date on which the Grant Deed for the Subject Fee Property in favor of City is recorded in the Official Records of the Riverside County Recorder's Office. Provided all of Seller's and City's obligations to be performed on or before Close of Escrow have been performed and all the conditions to the Close of Escrow set forth in this Agreement have been satisfied, escrow shall close thirty (30) calendar days after the Opening of Escrow ("Closing Date"). All risk of loss or damage with respect to the Subject Fee Property shall pass from Seller to City at the Close of Escrow. Possession of the Subject Fee Property shall be delivered to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow. 3. Purchase Price. The total purchase price that City will pay to Seller for the Subject Fee Property is the sum of $1,600,498.00 (One Million Six Hundred Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Eight Dollars) ("Purchase Price") for the fair market value of the Subject Fee Property, the compensation for the impact of Phase II on the remainder portions of the Larger Parcel, impact of the acquisition of the Subject Fee Property and Phase II on the subject billboard, including loss of the ground lease rent in connection with said subject billboard, and any and all damages related thereto. The total Purchase Price reflects a negotiated agreement for the value of the of the 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property for the total compensation of $781,350. The difference between the total Purchase Price of $1,600,498 and said $781,350 represents the compensation for all interests of Larchmont Park in and to the billboard impacted by Phase 11, including the ground lease, loss of ground lease rent, and severance damages for the impact of Phase 11 and the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests on the Northerly Parcels. a. The Purchase Price is the total price for the Subject Fee Property without distinction or separation for various interests that may be held in the Subject Fee Property, except for any compensation due by the City to Lamar Advertising Company in connection with the impact of Phase Il on the subject billboard structure. The billboard structure is owned by Lamar Advertising Company. The Purchase Price does not include any compensation that is owed to Lamar Advertising Company in connection with the impact of Phase 11 on said subject billboard structure. Except as otherwise provided herein, Seller is responsible for any apportionment or allocation of the Purchase Price if required for any separately held interests that may exist in the Subject Fee Property, including any compensation due by Seller to BWTB Jackson Street, LLC in connection with any interest that BWTB Jackson Street, LLC may have in connection with any portions of the Larger Parcel. As a matter which is not to concern the Buyer or Escrow Holder, Seller represents that Seller will apportion $541,605 of the total Purchase Price to the Southerly Parcels and the remaining $1,058,893 portion of the Purchase Price to the Northerly Parcels outside of this Escrow. Seller expressly agrees and acknowledges that Buyer and Escrow Holder will have no responsibility or liability in connection with said apportionment or disbursement of -4- 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc the Purchase Price by Seller and will indemnify and hold Buyer and Escrow Holder harmless for any claims, causes of action, or damages arising in connection with said apportionment or Seller's disbursement of any portion of the Purchase Price. 4. Title and Title Insurance. a. Title Insurance. Upon the Opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder will obtain and issue a title commitment for the Subject Fee Property. Escrow Holder will also request two copies each of all instruments identified as exceptions on said title commitment. Upon receipt of the foregoing, Escrow Holder will deliver these instruments and the title commitment to City and Seller. Escrow Holder will insure City's interest in the Subject Fee Property described in Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" to this Agreement at the Close of Escrow by a CLTA Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance (or an ALTA Extended Coverage Form of Title Policy ("Alta Extended Policy") if the City elects such coverage as provided below in Section 4.b.) in the amount of the Purchase Price ("Title Policy"), with liability in the full amount of the Purchase Price, insuring title to the Subject Fee Properly as vested in City, free and clear of all monetary liens and encumbrances and other matters affecting title to the Subject Fee Property, except for the permitted title exceptions defined below and any permitted conditions of title that Buyer approves in writing (collectively "Permitted Title Exceptions): i. General and special real property taxes and assessments for the then current tax fiscal year which are a lien not then due and payable; ii. The applicable zoning, building, and development regulations of any municipality, county, state, or federal jurisdiction affecting the Larger Parcel; iii. Such other non -monetary exceptions listed in the Preliminary Title Report that City has approved within ten (10) business days after the date the City receives the title commitment and legible copies of instruments noted as exceptions therein. If City conditionally disapproves any exceptions, then Seller will use good faith efforts to seek to cause such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. In no event will Seller be required to file any legal action to seek to remove any exception conditionally disapproved by the City. If such conditionally disapproved non -monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, the City may, at the City's option, either accept the Subject Fee Property subject to such encumbrances or terminate the Escrow. In the event Escrow is terminated, within ten (10) business days of the written notice of termination to Escrow, Escrow will disburse the City any funds deposited into Escrow by City less any escrow cancellation charges. iv. Any exceptions directly or indirectly caused by City or City's agents, employees or contractors. b. The City will have the option of obtaining an ALTA Extended Policy or a CLTA Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance. If the City, in its sole discretion, determines to obtain an ALTA Extended Policy, the City will, at its expense, procure an ALTA survey. The City will also pay for the cost of any such ALTA Extended Policy. -5- 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc C. Acts After Date of Agreement. During the period from the date of this Agreement through the Close of Escrow, Seller shall not encumber the Subject Fee Property, record or permit to be recorded any document or instrument relating to the Subject Fee Property, or physically alter the Subject Fee Property or permit or cause to be altered without the prior written consent of Buyer, which consent may be withheld in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion. Escrow. a. Deposit of Funds in Escrow. City covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder the Purchase Price and any such escrow funds that are required within five (5) business days of receiving written notice from Escrow holder regarding the confirmation of the completion of the conditions required herein for the Close of Escrow. b. Deposit of Documents in Escrow by Seller. Seller covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder the following documents within ten (10) business days of the Opening of Escrow: i. Grant Deed. The Grant Deed in the form attached as Exhibit "C" hereto ("Grant Deed") duly executed and acknowledged by Seller. Exhibit "C" is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ii. A California 593 certificate and federal non -foreign affidavit. iii. Any other documents reasonably required by Escrow Holder or the Title Company to be deposited by Seller to carry out this escrow. iv. Consent & Disclaimer. Consent and Disclaimer of Interest of BWTB Jackson Street, LLC in and to the Subject Fee Property and to the just compensation that the City will pay for the Subject Fee Property in the form attached as Exhibit "D" hereto ("Consent and Disclaimer"). V. Assignment of Ground Lease. Seller agrees to execute and deposit with Escrow Holder an Assignment of the Ground Lease for the subject billboard in the form acceptable to Buyer. C. Deposit of Documents in Escrow by City. i. Certificate of Acceptance. An executed Certificate of Acceptance in the form attached to the Grant Deed (attached hereto as Exhibit "C"). ii. Any other documents reasonably required by Escrow Holder to be deposited by Buyer to carry out this escrow. d. Recordation of Grant Deed and Consent & Disclaimer; Delivery of Funds and Possession. Upon receipt of the funds and instruments described in Section 5, Escrow Holder shall cause the Grant Deed and the Consent and Disclaimer to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, California. Thereafter, Escrow Holder shall deliver the proceeds of this escrow (less appropriate charges as shown on a preliminary Settlement Statement -6- 11096-0204\2610497v2.doc executed by City and Seller) to Seller, and Seller shall deliver to City possession of the Subject Fee Property free and clear of all occupants. e. Prorations. Real property taxes for the Subject Fee Property shall not be prorated, but must be paid by Seller for the current tax period. Seller may apply for a refund of property taxes in the event any property taxes paid are allocable to the period after the Close of Escrow and City shall reasonably cooperate therewith. City, as a municipal corporation acquiring property for Phase II, is exempt from property taxes pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922, and other provisions of law. All property assessments shall be prorated between Buyer and Seller as of the Close of Escrow based on the latest available tax information. All prorations for such assessments shall be determined on the basis of a 365-day year. Escrow Holder is authorized to pay from the Purchase Price any unpaid delinquent taxes and/or penalties and interest thereon, and for any delinquent or non -delinquent assessments or bonds recorded against the Subject Fee Property. f. Costs of Escrow. City will pay for the cost of the Title Policy (or ALTA Extended Policy if City elects to obtain such extended coverage). City will also pay for escrow fees and Escrow Holder's customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long distance telephone calls, etc. City will pay for recording the Grant Deed, and any documentary or other local transfer taxes, if any, and for any recording costs (if any). City will also pay for the costs of an ALTA survey if it determines to obtain an ALTA Extended Policy. g. Escrow Cancellation Char es. If escrow fails to close through no fault of either party, City will pay all escrow and title cancellation charges. In the event that this escrow shall fail to close by reason of the default of either party hereunder, the defaulting party shall be liable for all escrow and title cancellation charges 6. Conditions to the Close of Escrow. Escrow shall not close unless and until both Parties have deposited with Escrow Holder all sums and documents required to be deposited as provided in Section 5. Additionally, City's obligation to proceed with the transaction contemplated by this Agreement is subject to the satisfaction of all of the following conditions precedent, which are for City's benefit and may be waived only by City: a. Seller shall have performed all obligations to be performed by Seller hereunder. b. Title Company shall have issued or shall have committed to issue the Title Policy to City, for the amount of the Purchase Price, showing fee title to the Subject Fee Property to be vested in City subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions. Escrow Holder will use the proceeds of the Purchase Price to obtain a full reconveyance of any monetary liens encumbering the approximate 52,090 square foot Subject Fee Property, so that said Subject Fee Property is free and clear of monetary liens and encumbrances at the Close of Escrow. Escrow Holder will obtain final approval from Seller regarding the disbursement of the proceeds prior to disbursing any such proceeds to the holder(s) of the monetary liens encumbering the Subject Fee Property. C. If any of the conditions to Close of Escrow are not timely satisfied for a reason other than a default of City or Seller under this Agreement, and this Agreement is - 7_ 1 1086-0204\2610497 v2.doc terminated, then upon termination of this Agreement, Escrow Holder will promptly return to City all funds (and all interest accrued thereon, if any) and documents deposited by City in escrow and return to Seller the documents deposited by Seller in escrow that are held by Escrow Holder on the date of the termination (less any escrow cancellation charges). 7. Permission to Enter/Due Diligence Testing. During the period commencing on the Effective Date ("commencement date") and ending at 5:00 p.m. fifteen (15) business days after said commencement date (referred to as the "Due Diligence Period"), City may inspect the Subject Fee Property as necessary for the purpose of making inspections and other examinations of the Subject Fee Property, including, but not limited to, the right to perform soil and geological tests of said Subject Fee Property and an environmental site assessment thereof. City will give Seller written notice twenty-four (24) hours before going on the Subject Fee Property to conduct such due diligence testing. City's physical inspection of the Subject Fee Property shall be conducted during normal business hours. No invasive testing or boring shall be done by City without the prior written notification to Seller and obtaining Seller's written permission of the same, which permission shall not be unreasonably withheld. City does hereby indemnify and forever save Seller, Seller's heirs, successors and assigns free and harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, damages, costs, expenses, demands, causes of action, claims or judgments, arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Subject Fee Property in connection with any accident or other occurrence at the Subject Fee Property in connection with City's due diligence testing and environmental site assessments involving entrance onto the Subject Fee Property pursuant to this Section. If City fails to acquire the Subject Fee Property due to City's default, this license/permission to enter will terminate upon the termination of City's right to purchase said Subject Fee Property. In such event, City will remove or cause to be removed any personal property, facilities, tools, and equipment from the Subject Fee Property left in the area comprising the Subject Fee Property in connection with the due diligence testing and restore said area to as close as possible to the condition of said area prior to City's due diligence testing. The Parties agree that the City will provide to Seller a copy of any studies, reports, or other written documents in connection with such due diligence testing. The City will also provide copies of any such studies, reports, or other written documents in connection with such due diligence testing to its attorneys, Caltrans, FHWA, if applicable, the City of Murrieta, and consultants for Phase II. The Parties will not distribute or disclose to third parties said studies, reports, or other written documents in connection with such due diligence testing unless such disclosure is required by applicable law, the Public Records Act, or other pertinent statutory, or constitutional requirement. 8. Representation and Warranties of Seller. Seller hereby represents and warrants to City the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and will survive the Close of Escrow: a. That to the best of Seller's knowledge on the Close of Escrow (i) the Subject Fee Property will be free and clear of Hazardous Materials (defined in Section 14.a. below) or toxic substances and waste, including, but not limited to, asbestos; (ii) businesses, if any, on the Subject Fee Property have disposed of their waste in accordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations; and (iii) Seller has no notice of any pending or threatened action or proceeding arising out of the condition of the Subject Fee Property or alleged violation of Environmental Laws (defined in Section 14.b. below), health or safety statutes, ordinance, or regulations. -8- 1 1086-0204\2610497v2.doc b. That other than the BWTB Jackson Street, LLC interest, as has been disclosed, Seller is the sole owner of the Subject Fee Property free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments from adjacent properties, encroachments by improvements or vegetation on the Subject Fee Property onto adjacent property, or rights of way of any nature, other than those that may appear on the title commitment. Seller will not further encumber the Subject Fee Property or allow the Subject Fee Property to be further encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow. C. Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder, including the transfer of the Subject Fee Property to City, violates or will violate any contract, agreement, or instrument to which Seller is a party, or which affects the Subject Fee Property, and, except for the Consent and Disclaimer discussed in Section 5.b.iv., the Seller's grant to City of the Subject Fee Property pursuant to this Agreement does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto. d. Except as disclosed in the title commitment referred to in Section 4.a, there are no claims or liens presently claimed or that will be claimed against the Subject Fee Property by contractors, subcontractors, or suppliers, engineers, architects, surveyors or others that may have lien rights for work performed or commenced prior to the Effective Date. Seller agrees to hold City harmless from all costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or any similar lien claimed against the Subject Fee Property and arising from work performed or commenced prior to the Close of Escrow. e. Except as disclosed in the title commitment referred to in Section 4.a., there are no written or oral leases or contractual rights or options to lease, purchase, or otherwise enjoy possession, rights, or interest of any nature in and to the Subject Fee Property, or any part thereof, and no persons have any right of possession to the Subject Fee Property, or any part thereof. Seller agrees to hold City harmless from all costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including attorneys' fees, arising from or relating to any claims by any person or entity claiming rights to possession of any portion of the Subject Fee Property. f. Seller has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential litigation, action or proceeding against Seller or any other party before any court or administrative tribunal that involves the Subject Fee Property. 9. Representations and Warranties of City. City hereby represents and warrants to Seller the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and will survive the Close of Escrow: a. City has taken all required action to permit it to execute, deliver, and perform its obligations under this Agreement. b. City has the power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder and consummate the transaction contemplated herein. 10. Total Consideration. City's payment to Seller of the Purchase Price set forth in this Agreement is an all-inclusive settlement and is the full and complete consideration and -9- 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc payment of just compensation for the fair market value of the Subject Fee Property, any improvements thereon, severance damages, inverse condemnation, precondemnation damages, attorneys' fees, interest, appraisal costs, loss of rents, lost profits, ground lease interest in connection with subject billboard, impact to subject billboard, any other damages of every kind and nature suffered by Seller by reason of City's acquisition of the Subject Fee Property, or Phase II for which City is acquiring the Subject Fee Property, and all costs and expenses whatever in connection therewith. 11. Business Goodwill. a. No Loss of Business Goodwill. Seller agrees and acknowledges that Seller will not suffer any loss of business goodwill under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510 as a result of City's acquisition of the Subject Fee Property or the construction of Phase II because Seller does not operate a business on the Larger Parcel. The Larger Parcel is not improved with a structure or building and no business operates on said Larger Parcel. Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510, the owner of a business conducted on the property taken, or on the remainder if the property is part of a larger parcel, will be compensated for loss of goodwill if the owner proves that (i) the loss is caused by City's acquisition of the property or the injury to the remainder; (ii) the loss cannot reasonably be prevented by a relocation of the business or by taking steps and adopting procedures that a reasonably prudent person would take and adopt in preserving the goodwill; (iii) compensation for the loss will not be included in payments under Government Code Section 7262; and (iv) compensation for the loss will not be duplicated in the compensation otherwise awarded to the owner. 12. Releases. a. This Agreement is a voluntary agreement and Seller on the Close of Escrow, on behalf of Seller, Seller's successors and assigns, fully releases City, its Councilmembers, officers, counsel, employees, representatives and agents, from all claims and causes of action by reason of any damage that has been sustained, or may be sustained, as a result of City's efforts to acquire the Subject Fee Property, or any preliminary steps thereto. Seller further releases and agrees to hold City harmless from any and all claims and causes of action asserted by any party, including BWTB Jackson Street, LLC, claiming to have an interest in or rights to possession of any portion of the Subject Fee Property or to any just compensation paid by City to Seller in connection with the Subject Fee Property. b. Seller acknowledges that it may have sustained damage, loss, costs or expenses that are presently unknown and unsuspected, and such damage, loss, costs or expenses that may have been sustained, may give rise to additional damages, loss, costs or expenses in the future. Nevertheless, Seller hereby acknowledges that this Agreement has been negotiated and agreed upon in light of that situation, and hereby expressly waives any and all rights that Seller may have under California Civil Code Section 1542 as it relates to the releases set forth in this Section 12, or under any statute or common law or equitable principle of similar effect. California Civil Code Section 1542 provides as follows: "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT -10- 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED RTY. Seller's Initials: City's Initials: Seller's waiver of rights and release of claims set forth above in Section 12.a. and Section 12.b. will not extend to and is not intended to extend to claims related to or alleged to arise out of negligence on the part of City, its agents or contractors, in connection with the physical construction of Phase II. This Section 12 will survive the Close of Escrow. 13. City's Contingencies. For the benefit of City, the Close of Escrow and City's obligation to consummate the purchase of the Subject Fee Property is contingent upon and subject to the occurrence of all of the following (or City's written waiver thereof, it being agreed that City can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow: a. That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are all true and correct; b. The delivery to Escrow Holder of all documents pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement; C. Escrow Holder's commitment to issue, in favor of City, the Policy with liability equal to the Purchase Price showing City's interest in the Subject Fee Property, subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions; and d. City's approval prior to the Close of Escrow of any due diligence testing, environmental site assessment, soils or geological reports, or other physical inspections of the Subject Fee Property that City might perform prior to the Close of Escrow. 14. Certain Definitions. a. The term "Hazardous Materials" will mean and include the following, including mixtures thereof: any hazardous substance, pollutant, contaminant, waste, by-product or constituent regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601 et seq.; oil and petroleum products and natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas and synthetic gas usable for fuel; pesticides regulated under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. Section 136 et seq.; asbestos and asbestos -containing materials, PCBs and other substances regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 2601 et seq.; source material, special nuclear material, by-product material and any other radioactive materials or radioactive wastes, however produced, regulated under the Atomic Energy Act or the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982; chemicals subject to the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, 29 C.F.R. Section 1910.1200 et seq.; industrial process -11- 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc and pollution control wastes, whether or not hazardous within the meaning of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq.; any substance defined as a "hazardous substance" in California Civil Code Section 2929.5(e)(2) or California Code of Civil Procedure Section 736(f)(3); and any other substance or material regulated by any Environmental Laws. b. The term "Environmental Laws" will mean and include all federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect on or prior to the Effective Date relating to environmental quality, health, safety, contamination and clean-up, including, without limitation, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 7401 et seq.; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq.; and the Water Quality Act of 1987; the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 7 U.S.C. Section 136 etseq.; the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, 33 U.S.C. Section 1401 et seq.; the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 4321 et seq.; the Noise Control Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 4901 et seq.; the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 651 et seq.; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq.; as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984; the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 300f et seq.; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act 42 U.S.C. Section 9601 et seq. as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act and the Radon Gas and Indoor Air Quality Research Act; the Toxic Substances Control Act 15 U.S.C. Section 2601 et seq.; the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 2011 et seq.; and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, 42 U.S.C. Section 10101 et seq.; and state and local environmental statutes and ordinances, with implementing regulations and rules in effect on or prior to the Effective Date. 15. Evidence in Court Proceeding. The Parties agree that the total Purchase Price of $1,600,498 or any inference of per square foot value of the Subject Fee Property on said Purchase Price will not be admissible as evidence of the fair market value of the Subject Fee Property in any eminent domain or other proceeding or litigation concerning the Subject Fee Property, or any portion thereof. 16. Default. In the event of a breach or default under this Agreement by either City or Seller, the non -defaulting party will have, in addition to all rights available at law or equity, the right to terminate this Agreement and the Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Subject Fee Property, by delivering written notice thereof to the defaulting party and to Escrow Holder, and if City is the non -defaulting party, City will thereupon promptly receive a refund of all of the deposits it deposited with Escrow Holder, if any, less City's share of any escrow cancellation charges. Such termination of the escrow by a non -defaulting party will be without prejudice to the non -defaulting party's rights and remedies at law or equity. 17. Notices. All notices and demands will be given in writing by personal delivery, certified mail, postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by Federal Express or other overnight carrier. Notices will be considered given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery, (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, or (c) one (1) business day following deposit with Federal Express or other overnight carrier. A copy of all notices will be sent to Escrow Holder. The Parties will address such notices as provided below or as may be amended by written notice: -12- 11086-0204\26l 0497v2.doc BUYER: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 Attention: Aaron Adams, City Manager COPY TO: Richards, Watson & Gershon 350 South Grand Avenue, 37th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Attention: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney SELLER: Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company Post Office Box 2467 Temecula, California 92593-2467 Attention: Stephen Wheeler, Manager ESCROW First American Title Insurance Company HOLDER: One Ridgegate Drive Suite 225 Temecula, California 92590 Telephone No. 951.296.2948 Attention: Debbie Fritz, Escrow Officer Electronic Mail: dfritz@firstam.com 18. Broker Commissions. No brokers represented the Parties in connection with this transaction. Seller will be solely responsible for the payment of any and all broker's commissions or similar compensation due to any broker representing Seller, if any, and Seller will defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against any and all claims for any broker's commissions or similar compensation that may be payable to any broker claiming it represented Seller in connection with this transaction. Each party will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against all claims of any agent, broker, finder or other similar party based upon such party's own acts in connection with this transaction. The provisions of this Section 18 will survive the Close of Escrow. 19. Rescission of Resolution No. 2021-70. The City agrees that within thirty (30) business days of Close of Escrow, City Staff will present to the City Council for approval a Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 2021-70. -13- 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc 20. Miscellaneous. a. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement will be effective only when duly executed by both City and Seller and deposited with Escrow Holder. b. Attorneys' Fees. In any action between Buyer and Seller seeking enforcement of any of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be awarded, in addition to damages, injunctive or other relief, its reasonable costs and expenses, not limited to taxable costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and reasonable fees of expert witnesses. C. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the Parties hereto with respect to the matters contained herein, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements or understandings, oral or written, pertaining to any such matters are merged herein and shall not be effective for any purpose. d. Counterparts, Facsimile, and Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile or electronic signatures/counterparts to this Agreement will be effective as if the original signed counterpart were delivered. e. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. f. Governing Law. This Agreement is deemed to have been prepared by each of the Parties hereto, and any uncertainty or ambiguity herein will not be interpreted against the drafter, but rather, if such uncertainty or ambiguity exists, will be interpreted according to the applicable rules of interpretation of contracts under the laws of the State of California, and not the substantive law of another state or the United States or federal common law. This Agreement will be deemed to have been executed and delivered within the State of California, and the rights and obligations of the Parties will be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. g. Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement, expressed or implied, is intended to confer upon any person, other than the Parties hereto and their successors and assigns, any rights or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement. h. Additional Documents. Each party hereto agrees to perform any further acts and to execute, acknowledge, and deliver any further documents that may be reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. i. Authority of City Manager. The City Manager may give any and all notices, consents, and terminations hereunder on behalf of the City provided they are in writing. The City Manager may execute the Agreement, Certificate of Acceptance, escrow documents, and any such documents or instruments that are necessary to effect the transfer of property interests contemplated herein. -14- 1 1086-0204\26 l 0497v2.doc j. Interpretation and Construction. Each of the Parties has reviewed the Agreement and each has had the opportunity to have its respective counsel and real estate advisors review and revise this Agreement and any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party will not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. The recitals and captions of the Sections and Subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein will in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction, or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement. k. Remedies Not Exclusive and Waivers. No remedy conferred by any of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each and every remedy will be cumulative and will be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The election of any one or more remedies will not constitute a waiver of the right to pursue other available remedies. 1. Severability. If any part, term or provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining provisions will not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the Parties will be construed and enforced as if this Agreement did not contain the particular part, term, or provision held to be invalid. in. Exhibits. The Exhibits attached hereto are incorporated in this Agreement by this reference. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] -15- 1 l 086-0204\2610497v2.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth below. Dated: l 4 — Lr Dated: -16- ] 1086-0204\2610497v2.doc SELLER Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company f By: Title: lilt!G' 20 C�I)A /4 I -It 41l11Q1 s7e v e 4 eIe lee el BUYER City of Temecula, a municipal corporation Aaron Adams, City Manager ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Exhibit "A" Legal Description of Subject Fee Property (Caltrans Parcel 24624-1) EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Those portions of Lots 124 and 125 per MAP of the TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY showing the Subdivision of a Portion of the TEMECULA RANCH, situated in the City of Munieta, County of Riverside, State of California, said map recorded in Book 8 of Maps, page 359, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Diego, said portions lying northeasterly of the freeway and southwesterly of the fallowing described LINE "A".. COMMENCING at the comer common to Lot 123 and Lot 124, of said map, in the centerline of Jackson Avenue as shown on map filed in Book 142 of Records of Survey, pages 89 through 104, in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside County.- thence along the line common to said lots South 48017'42' West 494-16 feet to the freeway right of way and the southeasterly most corner of that certain Parcel of land described in deed to the Stale of California recorded October 21, 1974, in Book 1974, page 134994 in Official Records of said Riverside County, said comer being the southerly terminus of the segment of fine described as South 31047'59' East 856-15feet in said deed, said comer- also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of said LINE mA!'-, thence departing said common line and proceeding along said freeway right of way and said segment of line North 31047'58' West 207.48 feet- thence departing said freeway right of way and said segment North 25000'07° West 457.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 3550.00 feet-, thence along said curve through a central angle of 7008'21' a distance of 442.34 feet- thence North 23'59'5:1'West 175.08 feet; thence North 33028'38'West 212-63 feet; thence South 6215113' West 23-24 feet to the freeway Fight of way and the northeasterly line of that certain parcel of land described in deed to the State of California recorded February 24, 1975 in Book 1975„ Page 21238 in said Official Records; thence along said freeway right of way and said northeasterly line North 27'08'47'West 143.81 feet to the northerly most angle point of said northeasterly line, and the southerly most comer of that certain parcel of land described by Directors Deed recorded October 18, 1982 in Book 1982, Page 179874 in said Official Records. - thence North 27008'47"West 396.65 feet along said freeway right of way and the southwesterly fine of said Director's Deed to the POINT OF TERMINUS of said LINE "A", said terminus being the intersection of said freeway right of way and the southwesterly Fight of way line of said Jackson Avenue. Containing 52,090 square feet, more or less. Together with underlying fee interest, if any, contiguous to the above described prop" in and to the adjoining freeway. 08-Rri- I 5-PM 8.3 Exhibit "All I I 086-0204\2610497v2.doc EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the GRANTOR hereby releases and relinquishes to the STATE any and all abutter's. rights including access rights, appurtenant to GRANTOR's remaining property, in and to the freeway. The bead ngs and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of -1983, Zone 6. Divide distances shown by Q.99991351 to obtain ground level distances. This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. X.T signature, �'f r " ✓L '�'v`^'f AFc- AND Prof essional Land Survsyur A. Date. September 14 2021 08-Rig-15-PM 83 Exhibit "A" EXP. 12/31 /21 CALL 1i 2/2 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc Exhibit `B" Depiction of Subject Fee Property (Caltrans Parcel 24624-1) 08—RI V-15 I ll N Qm J i 0 4608.96' 3 4 ( 6 7 43.3 ral\ 1 451+65Jr. "CO2° LLnt e� 7 56'04" Y � Y I R=200P 0.00 I 1 � 2 i6.59 432+45.2+ Por "cue LINE 955 6 165D.Ba' "CD9" L1r4E comple+en ss of Olglfa! 14 ges of +rila map. h 96.27' RT 44 +G8.97 "AT' LINE= 'y u a 9 440 1 2 3 A 44S PT 46446, •m t4z A44+aor.4e"AI" LtnEa ,^ N 75'41i'•1.3" A PRc 4l 2445,k4 YL6? LINE 440 L=1377.7T I !!1 1 8 9 460 [3 4 I I N WA 7'58" w 435 6 2o,.46. "TT Tla Trrr TrTr T7KT 1 F.i. N 25'00'07" w 457.28• .a f . ksr ` �o aT !i 414+71.60 � 910-060-009 PROPOSED--• a• L'3-� R/w T= 4" - EXIST R/IY 4 'CO;" LINE �3000, 00• \L 443+66.E+ f,9 Lr 167.10' . r F 855 :g2' - 176 - N 2<'�9-4!" w A4, •_•.. le�g��> zaa.de' 466.D5_ TT 7� �� YR7T TTTr ITITry I tr.TT7 �79m-- 1A7.37'" T N 41 rr 4rwwT6 T / Yy POR LOT I24 1602 910-060-006 ` SD CO MER 2/35-J H 41" w (3'50. '-L•1 910-0/60-014 - Y 41°4�• -ter— / RirI f / 010 r 1 H ;tax' _��. •,G1^ o _ r� N 214297346 I E 6279901:00 f / f of a / ANC pGs[pI N��i6 �° I 1 i STrYiEO�•I���I1992 �1 JJ 1219'� TI / 10•R 1, DETA IL NO 74674-1 1 F I LARCHWONT PARK ,11}a•�J-� 15 - C�' 4 S� LET/AI ..910-A40-007 ��' Ikt7{E-r~ lR1 • �.� �.���y1A+ • �OpOSL � ! qsr-trea-ao � -• H • Rn � ,Yne o A..�J�JAy --- ,so�GlL A .�5 / 4�6{5= C/L? !NP ("A7" L]NE) jI / c/L Iw I / $46+.1t 21 !; i I "C7.. , AL mT X C2" LINE I r A I 6 IS 7 I AS5+14Y.59 ''� C wi:n LINE PDT\"cozL1raE 465 6 1 PT 4L9+G7.! �- C/L FIG 5T N 1 44waII.13 ; 1 ra4 uNE tip o 1 4454F8.� Llhr fr. 4..` •� N27'08-4)^w rT T7Tr ryK• T7779'46 w - T + w •-.d•111 711, •a � 42.42' �+�-'' - rl� = 2 01 - hr..44 R- 5 1 J q�i�'+6 DETAIL 'A' `'--- (FROM SHT. 61 --- C/L JACKSON 1 209,1344 1 5?.,090 Exhibit `B" II086-0204\2610497v2.doc Exhibit "B-1" Rough Depiction of Subject Billboard Impacted by Phase 1I JIM \ North Face Exhibit "B-1" 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc Exhibit "C" Form of Grant Deed Exhibit "C" 11086-0204\2610497v2.doc RECORDING REQUESTED BY When Recorded Mail To City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: City Clerk FREE RECORDING: This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula, and is entitled to be recorded without fee or tax. (Govt. Code 6103, 27383 and Rev. & Tax Code 11922) APN: 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009 GRANT DEED (CORPORATION) Space above this line for Recorder's Use District County Route Postmile Number 08 Riv 15 8.3 Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company, hereinafter called GRANTOR hereby grants to CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation hereinafter called GRANTEE, that real property in the City of Murrieta, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED 08-Riv-15-PM 8.3 Number Dated this day of 20_ Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company BY NAME: ITS: BY NAME: ITS: 08-Riv-15-PM 8.3 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Those portions of Lots 124 and 125 per MAP of the TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY showing the Subdivision of a Portion of the TEMECULA RANCH, situated in the City of Murrieta, County of Riverside, State of California, said map recorded in Book 8 of Maps, page 359, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Diego, said portions lying northeasterly of the freeway and southwesterly of the following described LINE "A": COMMENCING at the corner common to Lot 123 and Lot 124, of said map, in the centerline of Jackson Avenue as shown on map filed in Book 142 of Records of Survey, pages 89 through 104, in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside County; thence along the line common to said lots South 48017'42" West 494.16 feet to the freeway right of way and the southeasterly most corner of that certain parcel of land described in deed to the State of California recorded October 21, 1974, in Book 1974, page 134994 in Official Records of said Riverside County, said corner being the southerly terminus of the segment of line described as South 31 °47'59" East 856.15 feet in said deed, said corner also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of said LINE "A"; thence departing said common line and proceeding along said freeway right of way and said segment of line North 31 °47'58" West 207.48 feet; thence departing said freeway right of way and said segment North 25000'07" West 457.28 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 3550.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 7008'21" a distance of 442.34 feet; thence North 23°59'51" West 175.08 feet; thence North 33028'38" West 212.63 feet; thence South 62051'13" West 23.24 feet to the freeway right of way and the northeasterly line of that certain parcel of land described in deed to the State of California recorded February 24, 1975 in Book 1975, Page 21238 in said Official Records; thence along said freeway right of way and said northeasterly line North 27008'47" West 143.81 feet to the northerly most angle point of said northeasterly line, and the southerly most corner of that certain parcel of land described by Director's Deed recorded October 18, 1982 in Book 1982, Page 179874 in said Official Records; thence North 27008'47" West 396.65 feet along said freeway right of way and the southwesterly line of said Director's Deed to the POINT OF TERMINUS of said LINE "A", said terminus being the intersection of said freeway right of way and the southwesterly right of way line of said Jackson Avenue. Containing 52,090 square feet, more or less. Together with underlying fee interest, if any, contiguous to the above described property in and to the adjoining freeway. 08-Riv-15-PM 8.3 1/2 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the GRANTOR hereby releases and relinquishes to the STATE any and all abutter's rights including access rights, appurtenant to GRANTOR's remaining property, in and to the freeway. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Divide distances shown by 0.99991351 to obtain ground level distances. This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor's Act. Signature Professional Land Surveyor Date: September 14 2021 LAND 9L�� EXP. 12/31 /21 IMCAL�Fb 08-Riv-15-PM 8.3 2/2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature 08-Riv-15-PM 8.3 (Seal) CITY OF TEMECULA Office of the City Clerk 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED (Govt. Code § 27281) (Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009) This is to certify that the attached Grant Deed, which conveys in fee to the City of Temecula that certain real property located in the City of Murrieta, County of Riverside described more particularly in Exhibit "A" to said Grant Deed, is hereby accepted under the authority of the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation Aaron Adams, City Manager Exhibit "D" Form of Consent and Disclaimer of Interest of BWTB Jackson Street, LLC Exhibit "D" 11086-0204\2610497v2.doe RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Clerk's Office Space Above for Recorder's Use Assessor's Parcel Nos. [X] Portions 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009 and 910-060-015 Documentary Transfer Tax $0.00 This Instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is exempt from Recording Fees (Govt. Code § 27383), Filing Fees (Govt. Code § 6103), and Documentary Transfer Tax (Rev & Tax Code § 11922). CONSENT AND DISCLAIMER OF INTEREST OF BWTB JACKSON STREET LLC Larchmont Park, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Owner") is the record fee owner of that certain vacant real property located on the west side of Jackson Avenue near Fig Street in the City of Murrieta, California, and identified as Riverside County Tax Assessor's Parcel Numbers 910-020-077, 910-060-002, 910-060-003, 910-060-009 and 910-060-015 ("Property"). Owner intends to sell to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation in fee an approximate 52,090 square foot portion of the Property ("Subject Fee Property") for public use, namely public street and highway purposes, retention wall construction, drainage, public utilities, and all uses necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the City's proposed construction of the I- I5/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II ("Phase II") and described more particularly in Exhibit "A" hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference. The Subject Fee Property includes any interests of Owner in and to a ground lease in connection with the outdoor advertising structure/ billboard ("subject billboard") located on the property line of the portion of the Larger Parcel identified as APN 910-060-002 that abuts the adjacent parcel identified as APN 910-060- 004. BWTB Jackson Street, LLC, a California limited liability company (`BWTB Jackson Street, LLC") claims to have an interest in portions of the Property. Owner has informed BWTB Jackson Street, LLC of Owner's intent to sell to the City the Subject Fee Property in connection with Phase II. BWTB Jackson Street, LLC hereby consents to Owner's sale to the City of the Subject Fee Property and hereby disclaims any right, title or interest in or to the Subject Fee Property more particularly described in Exhibit "A" hereto, including any interests in and to the subject billboard. Further, BWTB Jackson Street, LLC also disclaims any right or interest in and to the just compensation that the City may pay to Owner for the Subject Fee Property. BWTB Jackson Street, LLC, a California limited liability company Date: By: Title: Exhibit "A" Legal Description of Subject Fee Property EXHIBIT "A!' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Those portions of Lots 124 and 125 per MAP of the TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY showing the Subdivision of a Portion of the TEMECULA RANCH, situated in the City of Murrieta, County of Riverside, State of California, said map recorded in Book 8 of Maps, page 359, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Diego, said portions lying northeasterly of the freeway and southwesterly of the following described LINE 'A': COMMENCING at the comer common to Lot 123 and Lot 124, of said map, in the centerline of Jackson Avenue as shown on map riled in Book 142 of Records of Survey, pages 89 through 104, in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside County- thence along the line common to said lots South 48'17'42'West 494-16 feet to the freeway right of way and the southeasterly most comer of that certain parcel of land described in deed to the State of Calffomla recorded October 21, 1974, in Book 1974, page 134994 in Official Records of said Riverside County, said comer being the southerly terminus of the segment of line described as South 31'47'59" East 856.15 feet in said deed, said comer also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of said LINE 'W'; thence departing said common line and proceeding along said freeway right of way and said segment of line North 31'47'58' West 207.48 feet,- thence departing said freeway right of way and said segment North 25100'0T West 45728 feet to the beginning of a curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 3550-00 feet-, thence along said curve through a central angle of 7"08'21' a distance of 442.34 feet, thence Noah 23'5951'West 175,013 feet" thence North 33'28'38' West 212-63 feet; thence South 62'51'13' West 23-24 feet to the freeway right of way and the northeasterty line of that certain parcel of landdescribed in deed to the State of California recorded February 24, 1975 in Book 1975, Page 21238 in said Official Records-, thence along said freeway right of way and said northeasterly line North 27'08'47'West 143-81 feet to the northerly most angle point of said northeasterly line, and the southerly most comer of that certain parcel of land described by Directors Deed recorded October 18, 1982 in Book 1982, Page 179874 in said Official Records-, thence North 27'08'47'West 396.65 feet along said freeway right of way and the southwesterly line of said Director's Deed to the POINT OF TERMINUS of said LINE "A', said terminus being the intersection of said freeway right of way and the southwesterly right of way line of said Jackson Avenue, Containing 52, G90 square feet, more or less_ Togetherwith underlying fee interest if any, contiguous to the above described property in and to the adjoining freeway- 08-Riv-1 5-PM 83 1/2 EXHIBIT "AH LEGAL DESCRIPTION This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the GRANTOR hereby releases and relinquishes to Me STATE any and all abutter's rights including access rights, appurtenant to GRANTOR's remaining property, in and to the freeway. The bean ngs and distances used in the above description are fused on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6_ Divide distances shown by 0 99991351 to obtain ground Ievel distances. This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. signature: 4aN Pm`ession.al Land Surveyor H�L;�Fj. Date September 14. 202 EXP. 12 f 31 /21 P 08-Riv-15-PM 8.3 2/2 A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of On before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) LARCHMONT PARK, LLC APNs 910=020=077, 93.o-o6o-002 003, 009, 015 INTERSTATE 215 EXIST RW E;ISTRW ���� E%ST RhY 810.989-099 PROPOSED FEE c ::I: 9ID-0W OPOSED PA (� Y ✓ Fee-52,090SF ✓ Lease Interests of Billboards and APN gio-o6o-002 Alft c7" The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/1-15 IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road Interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the 1-15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215. Benefit: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing the northbound collector/distributer road system. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: The environmental re-evaluation and design are estimated to be completed in Fiscal Year2021-22. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.726 / PW16-01 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2020-21 Adjusted 2021-22 Adopted Budget 2022-23 Projected 2023-24 2024-25 Projected Projected 2025-26 Projected Total Project Cost Administration 2,552,128 251,670 227,000 227,000 227,000 3,484,799 Construction 88,950,000 88,950,000 Construction Engineering 1,279 10,899,721 10,901,000 Design & Environmental 17,898,086 1,221,217 19,119,303 Land Acquisition 9,393,251 5,826,900 743,100 15,963,251 Utilities 1,993 1,993 Total Expenditures 29,846,738 107,149,508 970,100 227,000 227,000 138,420,346 Source of Funds: CFD 01-02 (Harveston) 1,005,840 1,005,840 DIF-Street Improvements 75,360 75,360 General Fund 4,236,174 4,236,174 INFRA Grant 50,000,000 50,000,000 Measure A 1,627,914 1,627,914 Measure S 454,000 3,837,485 970,100 227,000 227,000 5,715,585 Reimbursements 6,008,000 6,008,000 SAFETEA-LU 1,602,360 1,602,360 STIP-Surface Transportation 47,600,000 47,600,000 Improvement Program TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 472,841 999,668 1,472,509 TUMF (RCTC) 2,343,000 2,343,000 TUMF (WRCOG) 11,450,112 5,283,492 16,733,604 Total Funding 27,673,241 109,323,005 970,100 227,000 227,000 138,420,346 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: 71 Alk c7" The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/1-15 IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project 2021-22 Prior Years 2020-21 Adopted 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. General Fund Includes Required Contribution match for TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) funds. 2. State Transportation Improvement Program 2014 RCTC Call for projects as approved by the Commission on November 13, 2013 ($10,000,000). 3. TUMF (RCTC)- Regional funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No.06-72-048-00 for a total of $7,517,000 ($5,517,000-ROW; $2,000,000-PS&E). $200,000 City Match, Phase I expended $3,174,000-ROW; $2,000,000 PS&E; $200,000 City Match. Phase II expended $2,343,000 ROW. 4. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 06-SW-TEM-1079 for a total of $11,575,000 reduced to $11,451,875 ($975,752-PA&ED; $8,801,875-PS&E; $1,674,248-ROW) for Phase I and Phase II. 5. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $4,078,000 reduced to $4,043,000 ($108,724 PA&ED;3,934,296 PS&E) for Phase I and Phase II. 6. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $1,925,000-ROW. No expenditures for Phase I. 7. TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to the RCTC Agreement No.17-73-007-00 in the amount of $1,472,509 ($673,562 ROW; $798,947 DESIGN; $106,603 City Match). 72 pF TF.q£C G" French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements - Phase 11 Circulation Project Location 0 400 800 Feet Them a p FrenchValleyParkway_Phasell.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis 2018 Aerial Data 58 Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve First Amended and Restated Term Sheet with United States Department of Transportation for I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II, PW16-01 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Kendra Hannah-Meistrell, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the First Amended and Restated Term Sheet with the United States Department of Transportation for I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II, PW 16-01 BACKGROUND: On February 25, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-11 which approved a Term Sheet under the fiscal year 2019 INFRA program with the United States Department of Transportation. The schedule for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II project has changed since the approval of the Term Sheet. This First Amended and Restated Term Sheet is necessary to incorporate the revised project schedule. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval and execution of the First Amended and Restated Term Sheet. ATTACHMENTS: 1. First Amended and Restated Term Sheet 2. Project Description 3. Project Location U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TERM SHEET UNDER THE FISCAL YEAR 2019 INFRA PROGRAM This first amended and restated term sheet is between the United States Department of Transportation (the "USDOT") and the City of Temecula (the "Project Sponsor"). The USDOT and Project Sponsor executed a term sheet on May 7, 2020 ("the Original Term Sheet"). This term sheet amends and restates in its entirety and replaces the Original Term Sheet. This term sheet reflects the conditional selection of the Project Sponsor to receive an INFRA Grant for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements Phase 2. The purpose of this term sheet is to set out the parties' mutual understanding regarding material terms and conditions to be included in subsequent agreements that the parties intend to execute to implement an INFRA Grant. The parties therefore agree to the following: 1. The INFRA Application. (a) The Project Sponsor's application for funding was dated March 4, 2019 and titled "Interstate 15/French Valley Parkway Improvements Phase 2." In this term sheet, the "Project" means the project proposed in the application, as modified by schedules A, B, and C. (b) The Project Sponsor states that: (1) all material statements of fact in the application were accurate when that application was submitted; and (2) Schedules A, B, and C document all material changes in the information contained in that application. 2. General Terms and Conditions. (a) In this term sheet, "General Terms and Conditions" means the content of the document titled "General Terms and Conditions Under The Fiscal Year 2019 INFRA Program: FHWA Projects," dated July 29, 2019, which is available at https:Hgo.usa.gov/xprMe. The General Terms and Conditions are part of this term sheet. (b) The Project Sponsor states that it has knowledge of the General Terms and Conditions. (c) The Project Sponsor acknowledges that the General Terms and Conditions impose obligations on the Project Sponsor and that the Project Sponsor's non-compliance with the General Terms and Conditions may result in remedial action, terminating of the INFRA 1of10 Grant, disallowing costs incurred for the Project, requiring the Project Sponsor to refund to the USDOT the INFRA Grant, and reporting the non-compliance in the Federal - government -wide integrity and performance system. 2of10 SCHEDULE A PROJECT TERMS 1. Scope of Work. (a) General Project Description. The Project Sponsor will construct a two-lane northbound collector -distributor system along I-15 from the Winchester Road/I-15 interchange to the I-15/I-215 junction. The collector -distributor system will be barrier -separated from the mainline highway and is approximately 3.3 miles long. The Project represents Phase 2 of a larger three-phase project to increase capacity on I-15. (b) Project Activities. This project will consist of the following activities: • Utility policy certification is anticipated on November 10, 2021. • Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) are anticipated to be submitted to Caltrans for approval on December 7, 2021. • Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration / Environmental Assessment with Finding of No Significant Impact Re -validation was approved on July 9, 2021. The original environmental clearance was approved on January 29, 2010. The environmental review and consultation of the project was carried -out by Caltrans under its assumption of responsibility pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. • Right of Way Acquisition activities are anticipated to be completed on March 31, 2022. • Supplemental Project Report is anticipated to be completed on October 24, 2021. • Supplemental New Connection Report is anticipated to be completed on October 24, 2021. • The Project's RTL date is anticipated on April 1, 2022, followed by the procurement of the construction contract. • Construction NTP is anticipated on October 31, 2022, with a 19-month construction duration ending on June 12, 2024. 2. Project Budget. INFRA Grant Amount: $ 50,000,000 INFRA Grant Amount Subject to 23 U.S.C. 117(d)(2): $ 0 Total Project Cost: $ 137,306,531 Previously Incurred Project Costs: $ 28,587,270 3of10 Sources of funds for Future Eligible Project Costs: INFRA Grant Amount: $ 50,000,000 Other Federal Funds: $ 1,602,360 State Funds (Non -Federal STIP): $ 47,600,000 Local Funds (TUMF): $ 4,710,296 Local Funds (City): $ 4,806,605 Private Funds: $ 0 Other Funds: $ 0 Total Future Eligible Project Cost: $ 108,719,261 3. Project Schedule. (a) Project Permitting, Planning, Licensing, and Other Approval Milestones. • 2019 FTIP Amendment Approval: December 31, 2019. • The Section 404 Nationwide 14 Permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement: March 11, 2022. • Construction Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans: March 31, 2022. • Supplemental Project Report: October 24, 2021. • Supplemental New Connection Report: October 24, 2021. (b)Pre-construction Schedule. • Preliminary Design Complete January 31, 2020 • NEPA Complete • Final Design Complete • Right of Way Complete • PS&EBid-Ready • Obligate & Advertise (c) Construction Schedule. July 9, 2021 December 7, 2021 March 31, 2022 April 1, 2022 June 10, 2022 The following construction schedule is approximate and is contingent upon a fully executed Fund -Obligating Agreement by the "PS&EBid-Ready" date listed in subsection (b) of this Project Schedule. 4of10 • Begin Construction October 31, 2022 • Construction Complete June 12, 2024 5of10 SCHEDULE B PROJECT -SPECIFIC ACCOUNTABILITY TERMS 1. Purpose of this Schedule. This schedule B documents project -specific information used to implement the accountability provisions in section 5 of the General Terms and Conditions. 2. Project Delivery Milestones. None. For the purpose of section 5 of the General Terms and Conditions, this schedule B does not enumerate any specific project delivery milestones. 3. Project Success Indicators. None. For the purpose of section 5 of the General Terms and Conditions, this schedule B does not enumerate any specific indicators of project success. 6of10 SCHEDULE C MATERIAL CHANGES FROM ORIGINAL TERM SHEET Schedule: This project's schedule has changed due to the unanticipated preparation of additional cultural reports for the environmental re -validation. These activities extended the duration of the environmental re -validation and delayed all other project tasks including extending the construction completion date from December 30, 2022 to June 12, 2024 MATERIAL CHANGES FROM APPLICATION The total future eligible Project costs have decreased by $1,411,920 since the application submittal, and the previously incurred Project costs have increased by the same amount. This change is due to payments for ongoing design work. The STIP funding noted in the application narrative will be allocated as State -only STIP funds instead of being changed to local funds. The Project Sponsor will utilize $1,500,000 of INFRA funding for right of way acquisition for advanced construction authorization. The same amount, $1,500,000, of local funds will be moved from right of way acquisition to construction. 7of10 EXECUTION BY THE PROJECT SPONSOR By signature below, the Project Sponsor acknowledges that it accepts and agrees to be bound by this term sheet. Executed this day of , 2021. Signature of Project Sponsor's Authorized Representative Name of Project Sponsor's Authorized Representative Title 8of10 EXECUTION BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By signature below, the State Department of Transportation (the "SDOT") acknowledges that it accepts and agrees to be bound by this term sheet, agrees to act as the Recipient to assist in the receipt and disbursement of the FY2019 INFRA Grant awarded for the Project, and agrees to perform such other administrative and oversight duties with respect to the award and the project as the Project Sponsor and the SDOT shall agree upon between themselves. Further, the SDOT shall comply with all applicable Federal laws, regulations, executive orders, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate to the duties it assumes under this term sheet in compliance with the term sheet's terms and conditions. Executed this _day of 92021. Signature of State Department of Transportation Designated Official Representative Name of State Department of Transportation Designated Official Representative Title 9of10 EXECUTION BY THE USDOT Executed this _day of , 2021. Signature of USDOT's Authorized Representative Name of USDOT's Authorized Representative Title 10 of 10 Alft c7" The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/1-15 IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road Interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the 1-15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215. Benefit: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing the northbound collector/distributer road system. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: The environmental re-evaluation and design are estimated to be completed in Fiscal Year2021-22. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.726 / PW16-01 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2020-21 Adjusted 2021-22 Adopted Budget 2022-23 Projected 2023-24 2024-25 Projected Projected 2025-26 Projected Total Project Cost Administration 2,552,128 251,670 227,000 227,000 227,000 3,484,799 Construction 88,950,000 88,950,000 Construction Engineering 1,279 10,899,721 10,901,000 Design & Environmental 17,898,086 1,221,217 19,119,303 Land Acquisition 9,393,251 5,826,900 743,100 15,963,251 Utilities 1,993 1,993 Total Expenditures 29,846,738 107,149,508 970,100 227,000 227,000 138,420,346 Source of Funds: CFD 01-02 (Harveston) 1,005,840 1,005,840 DIF-Street Improvements 75,360 75,360 General Fund 4,236,174 4,236,174 INFRA Grant 50,000,000 50,000,000 Measure A 1,627,914 1,627,914 Measure S 454,000 3,837,485 970,100 227,000 227,000 5,715,585 Reimbursements 6,008,000 6,008,000 SAFETEA-LU 1,602,360 1,602,360 STIP-Surface Transportation 47,600,000 47,600,000 Improvement Program TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 472,841 999,668 1,472,509 TUMF (RCTC) 2,343,000 2,343,000 TUMF (WRCOG) 11,450,112 5,283,492 16,733,604 Total Funding 27,673,241 109,323,005 970,100 227,000 227,000 138,420,346 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: 71 Alk c7" The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/1-15 IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project 2021-22 Prior Years 2020-21 Adopted 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. General Fund Includes Required Contribution match for TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) funds. 2. State Transportation Improvement Program 2014 RCTC Call for projects as approved by the Commission on November 13, 2013 ($10,000,000). 3. TUMF (RCTC)- Regional funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No.06-72-048-00 for a total of $7,517,000 ($5,517,000-ROW; $2,000,000-PS&E). $200,000 City Match, Phase I expended $3,174,000-ROW; $2,000,000 PS&E; $200,000 City Match. Phase II expended $2,343,000 ROW. 4. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 06-SW-TEM-1079 for a total of $11,575,000 reduced to $11,451,875 ($975,752-PA&ED; $8,801,875-PS&E; $1,674,248-ROW) for Phase I and Phase II. 5. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $4,078,000 reduced to $4,043,000 ($108,724 PA&ED;3,934,296 PS&E) for Phase I and Phase II. 6. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $1,925,000-ROW. No expenditures for Phase I. 7. TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to the RCTC Agreement No.17-73-007-00 in the amount of $1,472,509 ($673,562 ROW; $798,947 DESIGN; $106,603 City Match). 72 pF TF.q£C G" French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements - Phase 11 Circulation Project Location 0 400 800 Feet Them a p FrenchValleyParkway_Phasell.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis 2018 Aerial Data 58 Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Citywide — West Side Business Park Area, PW19-17 PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer Shawna Bennetts, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the improvements for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Citywide — West Side Business Park Area, PW19-17, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On December 29, 2020, the City Manager, under the authorities delegated by the City Council of the City of Temecula in Resolution 2020-83, awarded a construction contract to All American Asphalt, in the amount of $1,711,230.62, and authorized the City Manager to approve changes up to $171,123.06, to construct the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Citywide — West Side Business Park Area, PW 19-17 (Project). The completed project included the pavement rehabilitation of the entire lengths of Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Drive, Avenida Alvarado, Enterprise Circle North, Via Montezuma (east of the low flow crossing to Jefferson Avenue,) Del Rio Road, Las Haciendas, Calle Cortez, Business Park Drive and Via Dos Picos. All American Asphalt has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works / City Engineer. All work is warranted for a period of one year from August 27, 2021, the date the City obtained "beneficial use" of the Project. The retention for this project will be released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code 7107. The final contract amount is $1,650,876.14, which includes the original contract amount of $1,711,230.62, a net reduction of $75,440.72 based on a balancing of actual contract item quantities, and three contract change order totaling $15,086.24. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the Project and filing of the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to All American Asphalt, 400 E. Sixth St, Corona, CA 92879 to perform the following work of improvement: Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Citywide, West Side Business Park, PW19-17 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on January 25, 2022. That upon said contract the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, 777 S. Figueroa Street, Ste. 3900, Los Angeles, CA 90017 was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: Pavement Rehabilitation Program Citywide, West Side Business Park, PW19-17 6. The location of said property is: Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Drive, Avenida Alvarado, Enterprise Circle North, Via Montezuma (east of the low flow crossing to Jefferson Avenue,) Del Rio Road, Las Haciendas, Calle Cortez, Business Park Drive and Via Dos Picos in the City of Temecula. Dated at Temecula, California, this 25t" day of January, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 25th day of January, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO. 7664933 MAINTENANCE BOND for PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — CITYWIDE WEST SIDE BUSINESS PARK AREA PROJECT NO. PW19-17 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT All American Asphalt — 400 Sixth Street Corona CA 92879 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR a _Corporation (hereinafter called "Principal'), and (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland — 777 S. Fi Ueroa Street, Suite 3900, Los Angeles. CA 90017 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (hereinafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA (hereinafter called "Owner") in the penal sum of _ one Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Eighty Severs DOLLARS AND 611100 CENTS ($-165,087.61_) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the Owner, dated the 8th day of December , 2020 a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — CITYWIDE — WEST SIDE BUSINESS PARK AREA, PROJECT NO. PW19-17. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the Owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on this the 27th day Of -August -_, 2021 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 17th day of November , 2021 (Seal] - SUREJTY: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland By: L�! C.GCS2. L�aaCl�ctjt¢,p, Rebecca Haas -Bates (Name) Attorney -in -Fact (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney PRINCIPAL: All American Asphalt By: (Name) V (,Ce (es"Cfe`c f (Title) a JK c kc z (Name) Se C/-G { (Title) NOTE: Signatures of two corporate officers required for corporations. A Notarial Acknowledgement or Jurat must be attached for each of the Surety and Principal Signatures. CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached. and not the truthfulness. accuracv. or validity of that document. State of California County of Riverside On NOVEMBER 19, 2021 before me, Sarah Amanda Langley, Notary Public Date Here Insert name and Title of the Officer personally appeared Edward J. Carlson and Michael Farkas Name(s) of Signer(s) I who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in SARAH AMANDA LANGLEY his�hel: their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/ /their Notary Public • California signature(s)on the instrument the erson s or the entity upon behalf Riverside County � p (), Y p Commission # 2337877 of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. My Comm. Expires Nov 20. 2024 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the forgoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS hand and official seal. SignatureS %4A-- &94u(� Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document MAINTENANCE BOND Document Date: 11 /17/2021 Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Rebecca Haas Bates -Attorney in Fact Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Edward J. Carlson ❑ Individual X Corporate Officer—Title(s): Vice President ❑ Partner ❑ ❑ Limited ❑ General RIGHT THUMBPRINT ❑ Attorney in Fact OF S12NER ❑ Trustee Top of thumb here ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: 9 Signer's Name: Michael Farkas ❑ Individual X Corporate Officer — Title(s): Secretary ❑ Partner u ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact 70Pof thumb h ❑ Trustee ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: CALIFORNIA•ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 118-1 • w<.w..w•!T<.w<.w .ael4a<.w•!.�•.a .a<.wt.a< a<.w .a .a<.a . �•.aN.w<.aN.v,..a -a . <!s� .w<.c� .a a<.a .aC✓d .w _w. a .ae�'e� .a .w<. A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of Orange ) On 11/17/2021 before me, Liliana Gomez, Notary Public Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared Rebecca Haas -Bates NameKof SignerN who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person* whose name* is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/iftey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity Nis), and that by his/her/their signatureZ8 . on the instrument the person(, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. LILIANAGOMEZ Notary Public - California Orange County - ° Commission # 2243326 My Comm. Expires May 20, 2022 Place Notary Seal Above I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature 175 Signature of NotaryZic OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond No. 7664933 Document Date: 11/17/2021 Number of Pages: Two 2 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: All American Asphalt Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Rebecca Haas -Bates ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual W Attorney in Fact Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: {�4�,{'✓ -✓{v -'i4'✓5���✓.5��:��5'.viti'.{'u{'L{�ti✓. 'r/S'.ei.�.{'L - {C:. a"�'/0.�{'✓ •L -d -a ✓ -s a/{ ✓ - EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES "Article V, Section 8, Attorneys -in -Fact. The Chief Executive Officer, the President, or any Executive Vice President or Vice President may, by written instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attorneys -in -fact with authority to execute bonds, policies, recognizances, stipulations, undertakings, or other like instruments on behalf of the Company, and may authorize any officer or any such attorney -in -fact to affix the corporate seal thereto; and may with or without cause modify of revoke any such appointment or authority at any time. CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Secretary of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that Article V, Section 8, of the By - Laws of the Companies is still in force. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day of December 1998. RESOLVED: "That the signature of the President or a Vice President and the attesting signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any Power of Attomey...Any such Power or any certificate thereof bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company." This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day of May, 1994, and the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 1 Oth day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice -President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seals of the said Companies. this 17th day of November 2021 o SEAL 167%...,✓' eta? I331: Brian M. Hodges Vice President TO REPORT A CLAIM WITH REGARD TO A SURETY BOND, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE CLAIM INCLUDING THE PRINCIPAL ON THE BOND, THE BOND NUMBER, AND YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION TO: Zurich Surety Claims 1299 Zurich Way Schaumburg, IL 60196-1056 www.rei)ortsfclaims azurichna.com 800-626-4577 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of New York, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Illinois, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Illinois (herein collectively called the "Companies"), by Robert D. Murray, Vice President, in pursuance of authority granted by Article V, Section 8, of the By -Laws of said Companies, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, do hereby nominate, constitute, and appoint William SYRKIN, Rebecca HAAS-BATES, Sergio D. BECHARA and Richard ADAIR, all of Irvine, California, EACH, its true and lawful agent and Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings, and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Companies, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at its office in New York, New York., the regularly elected officers of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., and the regularly elected officers of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., in their own proper persons. The said Vice President does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article V, Section 8, of the By -Laws of said Companies, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President has hereunto subscribed his/her names and affixed the Corporate Seals of the said ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this I Ith day of June, A.D. 2019. o Rtt,s, .a u�orr, 0�`b_ of - — y4r.r�1 ATTEST: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND By: Robert D. Murray Vice President By: Dawn E. Brown Secretary State of Maryland County of Baltimore On this I lth day of June, A.D. 2019, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, Robert D. Murray, Vice President and Dawn E. Brown, Secretary of the Companies, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and acknowledged the execution of same, and being by me duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he/she is the said officer of the Company aforesaid, and that the seals affixed to the preceding instrument are the Corporate Seals of said Companies, and that the said Corporate Seals and the signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporations. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. Constance A. Dunn, Notary Public My Commission Expires: July 9, 2023 CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE for PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — CITYWIDE WEST SIDE BUSINESS PARK AREA PROJECT NO. PW19-17 This is to certify that All American Asphalt (hereinafterthe "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, underoath, thathe/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM — CITYWIDE — WEST SIDE BUSINESS PARK AREA, PROJECT NO. PW19-17, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Pavement Rehab Program Westside Business Park PW 19-17 ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. Dated: ����'`� 04�171 By: CONTRACTOR: Signature Michael Farkas, Secreta Print Name and Title Print Name and Title CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached. and not the truthfulness. accuracv. or validitv of that document. State of California County of Riverside On December 28 2021 before me, Sarah Ainanda Langley, Notai.y, Public Dale Here Insert name and Title of the Officer personally appeared Michael Farkas Name(s) of Signer(s) SARAH AM?4DA LANGLEY Notary Public - California Riverside County Cam misslon M 2337877 My Comm, Expirei Nov 20, 2024 who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(&) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in hislheAhei, authorized capacity(ios), and that by his/tie-rlheir signature(e) on the instrument the person(s), or the utility upon behalf of which the person(&) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the forgoing paragraph is true and correct WITNESS my.hand and official seal 5Stonaltir, F Place Notary Seal Above Slgnalure of Notary Public OPTIONAL 6Z j - Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release Document Date: December 28, 2021 Signer(&) Other Than Named Above Capacity(ie ,) Claimed by Signer(s.) Signer's Name: Michael Farkas ❑ Individual X Corporate Officer— Title(s): Corp. Secretary ❑ Partner u ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: Top of thumb here Number of Pages: Signer's Name: _ _ NJA Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for ADA Compliance for Pavement Rehab Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW20-08 PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer Shawna Bennetts, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the improvements for the ADA Compliance for Pavement Rehab Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW20-08, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On May 25, 2021, the City Council awarded a construction contract to IE General Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $186,000.00, and authorized the City Manager to approve changes up to $18,600.00, to construct ADA Compliance for Pavement Rehab Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW20-08 (Project). The completed project included the reconstruction of 28 curb ramps to meet current ADA standards. The ramps are located adjacent to streets scheduled for rehabilitation under the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — West Side Business Park project, PW19-17. IE General Engineering, Inc. has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works / City Engineer. All work is warranted for a period of one year from October 1, 2021, the date the City obtained "beneficial use" of the Project. The retention for this project will be released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code 7107. The final contract amount is $186,000.00, same as the original contract amount since no contract change orders were issued and all contract quantities were utilized. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the Project and filing of the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to All American Asphalt, 400 E. Sixth St, Corona, CA 92879 to perform the following work of improvement: ADA Compliance for Pavement Rehab Program — West Side Business Park, PW20-08 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on January 25, 2022. That upon said contract the Arch Insurance Company, 210 Hudson Street, Ste. 300, Jersey City, NJ 07311 was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: ADA Compliance for Pavement Rehab Program West Side Business Park, PW19-17 6. The location of said property is: Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Drive, Avenida Alvarado, Enterprise Circle North, Via Montezuma (east of the low flow crossing to Jefferson Avenue,) Del Rio Road, Las Haciendas, Calle Cortez, and Business Park Drive in the City of Temecula. Dated at Temecula, California, this 25t" day of January, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 25th day of January, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk BOND NO. SU1174679 MAINTENANCE BOND for ADA COMPLIANCE FOR PAVEMENT REHAB PROGRAM — WEST SIDE BUSINESS PARK AREA PROJECT NO. PW20-08 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT IE General Engineering, Inc., 1440 Beaumont Ave, Suite A2-130, Beaumont, CA 92223 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR a Corporation (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) (hereinafter called "Principal"), and Arch Insurance Company, 210 Hudson Street, Suite 300, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07311 - 1107 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (hereinafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA (hereinafter called "Owner") in the penal sum of Eighteen Thousand Six Hundred DOLLARS AND nomoo CENTS (S 18.600.00 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the Owner, dated the day of _ , 20 , a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of ADA COMPLIANCE FOR PAVEMENT REHAB PROGRAM — WEST SIDE BUSINESS PARK AREA, PROJECT NO. PW20-08. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the Owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on this the 1 st day of October P 20 21 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 13th day of December , 2021 . (Seal) SURETY: Arch Insurance C mpany By:l�f_ Mark D. Leskanic (Name) Attorney -in -Fact (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney PRINCIPAL: IE Geperal Engineering, Inc. By: tr (Name) (Title) By: Fa-r (Name) (Title) NOTE: Signatures of two corporate officers required for corporations. A Notarial Acknowledgement or Jurat must be attached for each of the Surety and Principal Signatures. Individual Acknowledgment State of County of On this } ss: day of , 2021, before me personally came to me known and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same My commission expires Principal Acknowledgment State of } ss: County of Notary Public On this day of , 2021, before me personally came to me known and who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he is the of . the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation, that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that he signed his/her name thereto by like order. My commission expires Notary Public Surety Acknowledgment State of Massachusetts } ss: County of Middlesex } On this 13th day of December 2021, before me personally came Mark D. Leskanic tome known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he/she is arattorney-in-fact of Arch Insurance Company the corporation described in and which executed the within instrument; that he knows the corporate seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the within instrument is such corporate seal, and that he signed the said instrument and affixed the said seal as Attorney -in -Fact by authority of the Board of Directors of said corporation and by authority of this office Un er the Standing Resolutions thereof. My commission expires 3/24/2028 otary Public WOSTA FLETCHER Notary ftW 0o v0wn* d CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of On I CCe �x`r- 1�eT� before me, i�GU0e-L- [Her9 r s n name 4 tue at the Officer) personally appeared 6 i L9 d - who pray d to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personksf whose named is re subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that li ,she/they executed the same ino/her/their authorized capacity, and that by is her/their signature,z) on the instrument the person}; or the entity upon behalf of 9 which the personKacted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. _ CANA L. CAMPB£LL WITNESS my hand and official seal. �p COMM .#2282589 U1 q" NOTARY PU9liC.CAIIFORNIA N RiVEE r �uw—`MY CQuM_Exp.MAR. 25, 2U23 � Notary Public Signature (Notary Public Seal) ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL INFORMATION NSTRUCTIONS FOR COV PLETNGTHIS FORIvt This farm complies with current Caftfornia statutes regaMn,; notary wording and, DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT lfneeded, should be completed and attached to the document. Acknowledgments from other states may be completed for documents being sent to that state so long ��n ff as the wording does not require the California notary to violate California notary 'k iC� V law. (Title or description of attached document. . • State and County information must be the State and County where the document p !S U " ` siguer(s) personally appeared before the notary public for acknowledgment. • Date of notarization must be the date that the signers) personally appeared which (Title or description of attached domment continued) must also be the same date the acknowledgment is completed. • The notary public must print his or her name as it appears within his or her Number of Pages Document Date i commission followed by a comma and then your title (notary public). • Print the name(s) of document signer(s) who personally appear at the time of notarization. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY THE SIGNER • indicate the correct singular or plural forms by crossing off incorrect forms (i.e. he/she/tl y, is /are) or circling the correct forms. Failure to correctly indicate this ❑ Individual (s) information may lead to rejection of document recording. ❑ Corporate Officer • The notary seal impression must be clear and photographically reproducible. Impression must not cover text or lines. If seal impression smudges, re -seal if a (Titte) sufficient area permits, otherwise complete a different acknowledgment form. ❑ Partner(s) • Signature of the notary public must match the signature on file with the office of the county clerk. ❑ Attorney -in -Fact Additional information is not required but could help to ensure this ❑ Trustee(s) acknowledgment is not misused or attached to a different document. Other _ Indicate title or type of attached document, number of pages and date. Indicate the capacity claimed by the signer. If the claimed capacity is a corporate officer, indicate the title (i.e. CEO, CFO, Secretary). Securely attach this document to the signed document with a staple. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION DECEMBER 31, 2020 Assets Cash in Banks $293,990,621 Bonds owned $ 3,620.730,816 Stocks $ 653,208,881 Premiums in course of collection $ 525,571,487 Accrued interest and other assets $ 593,248,584 Total Assets $ 5,686,750,389 Liabilities Reserve for losses and adjustment expenses $2,577,386,588 Reserve for unearned premiums $ 946,480,428 Ceded reinsurance premiums payable $ 377,159,781 Amounts withheld or retained by company for account of others $ 170,189,032 Reserve for taxes, expenses and other liabilities $ 483,069,562 Total Liabilities 4,554,285,393 Surplus as regards policyholders 1,132,464,997 Total Surplus and Liabilities $5,686,750,389 By: ter---� Attest: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer State of) J r l SS County of W Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Thomas James Ahern, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and Regan Shulman, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary being duly sworn, of ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Missouri; and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of financial condition of said company, as of December 31, 2020. d n to before me this A tin of WA nuf-�4 Subscnbed an war y w.. Notary P licaw ' 1•rf :,�="`� BARVARA A. LEE Notary Public. Slale of New Jorsey & • �.€+ r IL Commission # 50107758 Comm en Exurbs Jga� 27. 2024 1 AIC 0000358981 This Power ofAttorney limits the acts of those named herein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. Not valid for Note, Loan, Letter of Credit Currency Rate, Interest Rate or Residential Value Guarantees. POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Persons By These Presents: That the Arch Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, having its principal administrative office in Jersey City, New Jersey (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") does hereby appoint: Mark D. Leskanic of Natick, MA its true and lawful Attomey(s)in-Fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver from the date of issuance of this power for and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other surety obligations, in the penal sum not exceeding Ninety Million Dollars {9p M 000.001. This authority does not permit the same obligation to be split into two or more bonds In order to bring each such bond within the dollar limit of authority as set forth herein. The execution of such bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other surety obligations in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the said Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by its regularly elected officers at its principal administrative office in Jersey City, New Jersey. This Power of Attomey is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of the Company on December 11, 2020, true and accurate copies ofwhich are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect: "VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or the Executive Vice President, or any Senior Vice President, of the Surety Business Division, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys -in -fact, and to authorize them subject to the limitations set forth in their respective powers of attorney, to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other surety obligations obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process." This Power of Attorney is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of the Company on December 11, 2020: VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, or the Executive Vice President, or any Senior Vice President, of the Surety Business Division, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to the resolution adopted by the Board of Directors on December 11, 2020, and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company. In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by their authorized officers, this 22nd day of June, 2021 Attested and Certified�`an w Arch Insurance Co party Y i : V WRtR71NTE �4 ��y - sEAI Regan A. Shulman, Secretary I9Irl Stephen C. Ruschak, Executive Vice President STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA SS COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA SS I, Michele Tripodi, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that Regan A. Shulman and Stephen C. Ruschak personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are respectively as Secretary and Executive Vice President of the Arch Insurance Company, a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duly authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as their own free and voluntary acts for the uses and purposes therein set forth. /] "WedKO" County --- — WCanrrdr m E%pirnMy ]I. MS Canrnirkm "WWI r t i81d2! Michele Tripodi, Notary Public CERTIFICATION My commission expires 07/31/2025 I, Regan A. Shulman , Secretary ofthe Arch Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the attached Power of Attorney dated.I rny22 242_I on behalf ofthe person(s) as listed above is a true and correct copy and that the same has been in full force and effect since the date thereof and is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the said Stephen C. Ruschak, who executed the Power of Attorney as Executive Vice President, was on the date of execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected Executive Vice President of the Arch Insurance Company. 1N TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the Arch Insurance Company on this 131h day or UecGROW 2021 Regan A. Shulman, Secretary This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. PLEASE SEND ALL CLAIM INQUIRIES RELATING TO THIS BOND TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: Arch Insurance — Surety Division �• 3 Parkway, Suite 1500 ik)tin�w4> of Philadelphia, PA 19102 s gtM. 1071 To verify the authenticity of this Power of Attorney, please contact Arch Insurance Company at 5uretyAuthent+et9arcft%prance. Please refer to the above named Attorney -in -Fact and the details of the bond to which the power is attached. AICPOA040120 Printed in U.S.A. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE fo r ADA COMPLIANCE FOR PAVEMENT REHAB PROGRAM — WEST SIDE BUSINESS PARK AREA PROJECT NO. PW20-08 This is to certify that IE General Engineering Inc. (hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as ADA COMPLIANCE FOR PAVEMENT REHAB PROGRAM — WEST SIDE BUSINESS PARK AREA, PROJECT NO. PW20-08, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: ADA Compliance for pavement Rehab Project # PW20-08 ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract. the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, Isom any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. C TRACTOR: l21'6LIVA Dated: B v' Sig ature 6 5 d A,117L, 1 Print Name and Title CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of On e � � �a� before me, ) L u tr nn }} Hefe ft name a atte or me o =r1 personally appeared 0 r vAA,-�C� - who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons,$) whose namedare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she/they executed the same in��IiVherltheir authorized capacity�jag}; and that by , herltheir signature61 on the ins`tirument the personN, or the entity upon behalf of C�ich the person (zj acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. ,�^`°' DANA L. CAMPBELL - COMM. # 2282589 to WITNESS my hand and official seal. (� •m, y 3 NOTA.RYPUBLI_ CALFORNiA N RIVERSIDE COUNTY Y4�aaa �+rw°1v1Y Co61M. E!;P. M tR- 2G, 2D23; Notary Public Signature zl-(Notary Public Sea]) ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT (Title ordescripdan of a ed document) (Title or description of attached document continued) Number of Pages —L Document Date CAPACITY CLAIMED BY THE SIGNER ❑ Individual (s) ❑ Corporate Officer (Titfe) ❑ Partner(s) ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee(s) ❑ Other 2u15•tiJr-5.'_- NSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORNI Phis forth complies with current California stanites regarding uolmy wording and, ifneeded, should be completed and attached to the document. Acknowledgments from other states mqv be completed for documenrs being sent to. that stare so long as the wording does not require the Califonr[a notary to Walare California notary law. • State and County information must be the State and County where the document signers) personally appeared before the notary public for acknowledgment. • Date of notarization must be the date that the signer(s) personally appeared which mmust also be the same date the acknowledgment is completed. • The notary public must print his or her name as it appears within his or her commission followed by a comma and then your title (notary public). • Print the name(s) of document signer(s) who personally appear at the time of notarization_ • Indicate the correct singular or plural forms by crossing off incorrect forms (i.e. he)sheldiey: is lefe) or circling the correct forms. Failure to correctly indicate this infartmation may lead to rejection of document recording. ■ The notary seal impression must be clear and photographically reproducible. Impression must not cover text or lines. If seal impression smudges, re -seal if a sufficient area permits, otherwise complete a different acknowledgment form. • Signature of the notary public must match the signature on file with the office of the county clerk. Additional information is not required but could help to ensure this actmowledgment is not misused or attached to a different document. Indicate title or type of attached document, number otpages and date. Indicate the capacity claimed by the signer. If the claimed capacity is a corporate officer, indicate the title (i.e. CEO, CFO, Secretary), • Securely attach this document to the signed document with a staple. Item No. 9 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 18, 2022 CALL TO ORDER at 7:37 PM: President James Stewart ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Alexander, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 10. Approve Action Minutes of December 14, 2021 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of December 14, 2021. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:39 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. James Stewart, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 10 ACTION MINUTES SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 18, 2022 CALL TO ORDER at 7:39 PM: Chair Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart SARDA PUBLIC COMMENTS - None SARDA CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Stewart, Second by Alexander. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 11. Approve Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and Administrative Budget for the Period of July 1, 2022 Through June 30, 2023 (ROPS 22-23) Recommendation: That the Board of Directors 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2022-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING A RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2022 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2023 PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34177 AND TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2022-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34177 AND TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS SARDA ADJOURNMENT At 7:41 PM, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 25, 2022, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Matt Rahn, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Conduct a Public Hearing for the Purposes of Redistricting in the City of Temecula PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct the third of four public hearings for the purposes of redistricting in the City of Temecula. BACKGROUND: Every ten years, local governments use new census data to redraw their district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. Assembly Bill 849 (2019) and Assembly Bill 1276 (2020) require cities and counties to engage communities in the redistricting process by holding public hearings and doing public outreach. In Temecula, the City Council is responsible for drawing council districts and the redistricting process must be completed by April 17, 2022. District lines are adopted using the following state and federal criteria: Federal Laws: Equal Population (based on total population of residents as determined by the most recent federal decennial census and adjusted by the State to reassign incarcerated persons to the last known place of residence) Federal Voting Rights Act No Racial Gerrymandering California Criteria for Cities (to the extent practicable and in the following order of priority): 1. Geographically contiguous districts (Areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. Areas that are separated by water and not connected by a bridge, tunnel, or regular ferry service are not contiguous), 2. Geographic integrity of local neighborhoods or communities shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division, 3. Easily identifiable boundaries that follow natural or artificial barriers (rivers, streets, highways, rail lines, etc.), and 4. Lines shall be drawn to encourage geographic compactness. In addition, boundaries shall not be drawn for purposes of favoring or discriminating against a political party. The City Council will be holding hearings to receive public input on redistricting on the following dates: August 24, 2021 (1 st Pre -Draft Public Hearing) - Completed September 28, 2021 (2nd Pre -Draft Public Hearing) January 25, 2022 (1 st Post -Draft Public Hearing) March 8, 2022 (2nd Post -Draft Public Hearing) Redistricting information, including dates and times of hearings, and how to participate in the process, can be found online on the City's website at www.temeculaca.gov. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation 2. Draft Maps January 25, 2022 Shalice TiltonM, National Demographics Corporation Redistricting Process Step Two Initial Hearings Aug. 24 & Sept 28 Census Data Release Aug. 12 California Data Release Late Sept / Early Oct. Two Draft Map Hearings Jan. 25 & Mar. 8 Description Held prior to release of draft maps. Education and to solicit input on the communities in the Districts. Census Bureau released official 2020 Census population data in legacy format. California Statewide Database releases California's official `prisoner - adjusted' 2020 redistricting data, then mandated three-week waiting period for City or City's consultant to release NDC. Two Public Hearings to discuss and revise the draft maps and to discuss the election sequence. Map Adoption Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption. By Apr. 17 Map adopted via ordinance. Redistricting Rules and Goals Equal Population Federal Voting Rights Act No Racial Gerrymandering Itts 1. Geographically contiguous 2. Undivided neighborhoods and "communities of interest" (Socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together) 3. Easily identifiable boundaries 4. Compact (Do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people) Prohibited: "Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party." Minimize voters shifted to different election years Respect voters' choices / continuity in office Future population growth Preserving the core of existing districts Existing Districts/° a< a cole' ew n P ¢a a o °ACo ae e�` Q P aye < ao sPc^ r • -L' O a rcr N Qa i A Cam Cielo "IDS Rd a Liefer Rd °i c \a5 Fb N LOoP Rd dPe Rd i S Loop Rd Ostia "we, 79 ion „'�c9ee Gee\o � �o e- m aaag5Od '^ � 3 a Via Norte ,'a � Ford r iar Way 4 Pie ereC e6� o Q i e1 ReV Rd \a a\e0< 3 PG o o � a Q a 2020 Census a a ac �a gasU-a, �a°r°A °t o V`\y pO orte Las ruces d6 0` el", L 6 5t ofQ ap oC5 Cam Nune Pa Gc d ala on Greco cm,,Sene Qao\ G11 pYa9 �eQa Hili St 3 o G° 3 f Rancho Vista a5tA, RosarCt a LPrFe St Rosario Ct rt °12tR �< m O Gad o �di�P 4ata St Ca, m d o Rd ti C Cl/ Cd� �e Cd�a x av z a° ao e Sag ntze �d aptC Pensador St Ma°tO sICRV t Q< apo9a D� a Campanula Way to Win a je?-6 y qay� N v 2q 7e t4ott Cam P,dia R030Vya0 lQL alleloAve 5tangrat�9odpl kt`t,So` Maalew0 �. Via R' a y�nda Rd tte t eioO Ct Gordoa n ro i° CG \115 �y�a "he _ ro i Cir yJ�a 1 mbasSY Pv CF ® i � a I \aQ 3-t ��C c� � Rhine Ave � ie oya °may Citizen Voting Age Pop District 3 is under -populated by 8.77% District 1 is over -populated by 5.98% Total deviation 14.75% Highest Latino CVAP 29% in D5; D5 is majority -minority City, ofT'emecula - Exis ting Districts Field 1 2 3 4 5 Total Total Population 23,367 21,948 20,114 22,242 22,568 110,239 Population Deviation r 1,319 -100 -1,934 194 520 3,253 Pct. Deviation 5.98% -0.45% -8.77% 0.88% 2.36% 14.75% Total 14,927 14,452 14,212 15,430 15,196 74,217 Hisp 22% 26% 22% 22% 29% 24% NH White 55% 57% 64% 65% 49% 58% NH Black 4% 6% 5% 5% 8% 6% Asian/Pac.Isl. Pr 17% 11% Pr 8% 8% 14% 12% Native Amer. 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Draft A aKem" a � v m O ° mac' awn o` E 0 i © Chant 0 v Q< F� t�a`�Mcoleilip6l� PA pie e Qµ�Ac pie �a to e q � a c°r N Qa < 3 m Ca m _. aprin9s Rq m Cielo j Li Ca Rd a��° �N L° Rd9 Minimal Change for Population dge �. 5 Loop Rd i�gtianP}eadoWRd�- o �o Balance e mpCncpearce° O m aaa F°rd pr via Norte eposo No Council Pairings dey a`iaC' iar Way 4 p p` a, dei ReV Rd �a5da\eQt p� • Deviation 5. ! O% ti � Ftd �A ¢ ✓ - o and o 'n a ,aca Pasqua, 5�c� `� o an _ or V, m e! b °rte Las races Co VM p e6 Q� m°n Sri d y 0�5 Cam Nune Fa Cc C,�,e°° Germ Sene a°O O0%Ara Go ePa Se`es�o'(°rte�`e me Hilot c, y i J�a data f Rancho Vista o 3 0, -12 St � Sdnr�a90 O` � �z �P Ca�drbo o nappy ✓e tolrtd R�a�aco ref St J'a C Or O`Cd6��!. lac baba nsador St Mynrova (1 c 50� 09 �a �o Ca anula Way\tS IeF`d Wins p. ,0 ya V�eZ0 11Z °na 79 y40 Cam Pied.La "Yallej°Ave, de pon5tance St ktCs°C Ma PA co Via Rama :%Oda Pd a tte C P�°O 3n+ COcd°b�e� a 3 d Jed 0 iry C'�-r Am me-5 N n� d� 5on baSsY atP cb C, ,o ine Ave -0 u dS��F �Joc aia °c3 Gt 6' p o c� sa e a �-� ad 15 I�12'O 2020 Census Citizen Votuig Age Pap Field Total Population Papulatiau Deviatiou Pct. Deviation Total Hisp 1\7 I White NrH Black AsianJPac.Isl Native Amer. • Highest Latino CVAP 29% in D5; D5 is majority -minority • D3 southern boundary moves southerly to follow de Portola Rd. between Margarita Rd and Meadows Pkwy • D2 southern boundary to include a c` portion of the Red Hawk Golf Course and the homes west of Tiburcio Drive (Golf Clubhouse). e 2e Draft A of Temecula - 1 2 3 4 5 Total 21,648 22,469 21,312 2-2,242 22,568 110,239 -400 421 -736 194 520 1,256 -1.81% 1.91% -3.34% 0.88°�6 2.36N 5.706/6 13,776 14,601 15,213 15,430 15,196 74,217 2C 26% 22%22% 29% 24% C2D/o ss% 57% 63% 65% 49% 58% 50/0 60/6 5% 5% 8°f6 60/6 I 17% 110/6 9010 80/0 14% 12% 2°l0 1% OP/6 I% 16/6 10/6 Draft B aKem" a � v m .Z, ® Chant 0 v Q< a zt� �Qµ b o e �,eaQ° • o • °yaa�t �prrh9s Rd Cam Ciel0 j (ram-y°F a liefer Rd \v��a �� L°°p Rd9 Minimal Change for Population age c �?,. 5 Loop Rd �gtian qti eadoW Rd �e o �o Balance 79 Son C'ncfleetce\° n aaa F°rd p1 Norte epos° No Council Pairings de\ a`iac` iar Way 4 p p 0, dei tyeV Rd \ayaa\e�� P� I • Deviation 6.36% �c act an gaSQ�a\RS c�cA N p - pY Ln �� o d6 V�Qr pel�vn S L °rte Las races d m y 0�5 C Cam Nune Fa c a°' °d ala on c'�'e°° Cam Sene Qa°��G Ara G°wePa Se\e5\0-w eo�e Hil St c, a t`Gr m L J\a Ga\a m !' FPS Qa o (Rancho Vista a Y mo w R�a9 ■ �c. pi a°' q a �dii -(ara St w Fv RV e Aa P"` S 4��� �` �e tv�a9v Rtl c°Ot m° O��d✓Pd'�i to �actia a �a\arena st ManCOJaOr U, o�a0� 09 p y Ca anula Way F'ote Rd Wins r a� o aG Vhe e a �e y,1o\t 6 Cam PVed.La 4 k°� Valle" Z Ra L e ° St od ph Ma PA ea to Ave °nstanlg,6 " �tC`rv` T Via Rama Linda Rd tte C P�oO m �, Ca o � ordoba eta a � a L c4i V1a C �\a� !rye Qr _ 4, Ile_lrcmba Av Ave S. ci` c a o0 o rn u `1 V J ti a � c � a 7 0 v Category 2020 Census J V V )J V �_ Citizen Votuig Age NDC Pap Field Total Population Population Deviatiou Pct. Deviation Total Hisp 1LTH White NrH Black AsianJPac.Isl Native Amex. • Highest Latino CVAP 29% in D5; D5 is majority -minority • D3 southern boundary moves southerly to entirely follow de Portola Rd. • D2 southern boundary moves ay southerly to Temecula Creek to c` include Pechanga Drive and e 2e of Temecula - Draft B Cupeno Ln. 1 2 3 4 22,497 21,165 21,767 22,242 449 -883 -281 194 2.04% -4.009/0 -1.27°/Q 14,389 13,786 15,415 15,430 219/0 27°/o 22°/u 220/0 ss% 56% 63% 65% 50/0 60/6 5% 5% r 17% 110/6 90/0 80 0 2110 1% OP/0 1% 5 22,568 520 2.36 o 15,196 29% 49% 8°f° 14% 1 °/o Total 110,239 1,403 G.3G°/u 74 21 24°/0 58°J° 60/u 12°/0 10/6 Draft C Cam Cielo ° defer Rd 9 � o�a5 Rtl ,ge Cnr�gtiae( Meadow Rd I jo 9 5on VcDe 4 ° m as 3nf°rd �a Via Norte oene oso Dr ueuay de�ReP�a nar Way P�e� P'�eyej 6 Rd 1a e0 p aq N Loop Rd . 5 Loop Rd G Q< yA de; R day F� "ANicole Squat or Pp 'PJ�S Ore cP,e Q-a yRe"\40 ei so =�" Li5a�4a Dr '9 Corte Las races —`6 d Deln�0ryte prey ao C -Ve da O `sue sV ( a 6 (G tL y S Cam Nune d Pa Gc ��aa �aoaeP o o Dr C n�a5 ysta�Ya9°n q Cem 5 ee a°" o P o a Y 4a5 v 3_ �O C°lrte AlaZnar JHiloil t m ° Qac`r �;a y'Pz .Rancho Vista 1 ase° G cc Ro a 610 � Le')2 m' co Ra m�m.3 Let Rosario Ct �t 1110 -(afa F0 es�d °' d'n Cdd ib o S,t o (� \a Rd Fa c C e//!S m Pt ° di �( ?too y') o '' £ a tto Pensador St MagtO�a oc�d6 N��°Y9Qt a%9a L Q Campanula Way (eF`tl Win a�� S° o a�F ayR o v 4 y 79 '�40tt Cam PVed.La R " Q Q t tlp. M �a Vallejo Ave ConStanc$ra�o° etC" oe. aPlev L.�ndao aeca _ 4 ne G m A� embassy G d s � a aAc° sa aQc � 4q d u Gt ro P Sri d�J G lle� �aA 1; Oa) 16 `1 V ~ a c � a 7 ° v Category 202D Census J V V V V �— Citizen Votuig Age NDC Pap Ct Follows Neighborhood HOAs • No Council Pairings. Deviation 2.49% Highest Latino CVAP 27% in D5 • D3 moves northerly to include all Temeku Hills/Chardonnay Hills, northern border follows Serena Way • D4 moves northwesterly to pick up all Winchester Creek Campos Verdes Roripaugh Hills, mostly follows Margarita Rd. D4 moves south to pick up all of Woodcrest/Rancho Del Sol/Costain Signet/Villages. • D2 picks up Crowne Hill. D2 extends westerly to include area around Temecula Community Park • D5 picks up Starlight Ridge/Lake Village/Alta Vista City of Temecula - Draft C Field 1 2 1 3 Total Population 22,148 22,253 22,130 Population Deviatiou 1 DD 205 82 Pct. Deviation 0.45% 0.93% 0.37% Total 14,197 14,758 15,631 Hisp 21% 26% 220/6 1L7H White 550fo 561/u GG% NrH Black 4% G°/o 4% Asian/Pac.151. 17% 120/6 80/0 Native 'kmef. 20/0 10f0 0% 4 5 Total 22,005 21,703 110,239 -43 745 550 -0.20% -1.5610 2.499/6 17.699 13,931 74,217 25 °/0 2 i % 24% 590/0 52% 581)/0 GD/o 8°fo 60/6 1 D°r0 pr 12% IF 12% 00f 0 1 p/0 10/6 CY of Temecula - DYwft A Category Field 1 2 3 4 5 Total Total Population 21,648 22,469 21,312 22,242 22,568 110,239 2020 Census Population Deviation -440 421 -736 194 524 1,256 Pct. Deviation -1_816/0 1.916/0 -3.34°/0 0.880/4 2-30e,.3 5.706/6 Total 13,776 14,601 15,213 15,430 15,196 74,217 HYsp 22% 260/6 22% 2-20/4 29°IO 2411/6 Citizen Voting ?age NH Mute 55% 570/6 630/6 65% 49% 580/6 Pop NTH Blau 56/4 60/0 5% 5 0 86/0 60/6 ?isian/Pac.Isl. 17 010 11°/6 9°/O 80/6 14°/O 12% Native Amer- 2'6 1 °'6 0°'0 1 °'6 16/6 1% IC of Temecula - Draft B Category Field 1 2 3 4 5 Tatal Total Population 22,497 21,165 21,767 22242 22,568 114,239 2020 Census Population Deviation 449 -883 -281 1p9p4 520 1,403 Pct. Deiiation 2.046/6 -4.44°/0 -127% 4.006/6 2.369/6 6-369'6 Total 14,389 13,786 15,415 15,430 15,196 74,217 Hlsp 21% 276/6 226/6 22% 296/6 241,'6 CitizenVotuigAge NTHWlite 550/0 56% 63% 65% 49°/O 580/6 Pop NTH Black 5 0 6% 5% - -0 0 80/O 60/4 aisigm/Pac.Isl. 17% pr 11% 9°/O 8% 14% 12% ILTahre ?uner. 2°/6 10/6 4°'0 1 6/6 1% 1 6/6 CY of Temecula - Draft C Category Field 1 2 3 4 5 Tatal Total Population 22,148 22,253 22,130 22,005 21,703 110,239 2020 Census Population Deviation 100 205 82 -43 -345 550 Pct. Deiiation 4.456/O 0.93% 0_376/6 -4.206/6 -1.561.3 2.499,'0 Total 14,197 14,758 15,631 15,699 13,931 74,217 Hisp 2111/6 26% 22% 2511/6 2�6/0 246/0 Citizen Voting ?age NTH Wlute 550/6 560/6 66% 590/6 520/6 58% Pop NTH Black 4°, 66/6 4Ol O �}qf6 80/6 6% si-m/Pac.Isl. 17°'0 12% 8O/0 1(r/6 12O/0 12°/6 Native Amer- 2N 10/6 (r/O OD/O 1% 1% Proposed Sequencing ❑ Election Year 2022: Districts 1, 3, 5 ❑ Election Year 2024: Districts 2, 4 ❑ After focus maps are identified, it is recommended the City Council review and, if needed, adjust the district number assignments. Public Hearing & Discussion ❑ Public hearing to receive input on draft maps. ❑ Goal to identify 1-2 focus maps. ❑ Review and adjust the district assignments on the focus maps, if needed. ❑ Council can request variations be drawn on the focus map(s). ❑ All the maps and the full demographic summaries can be viewed on the website at https://temeculaca.gov/1172/Redistricting- Information ❑ The best way to view the maps in detail is through the interactive map viewer at this link: I.ILLub: / /art.;g.is/ObOj4 City of Temecula 2021 Redistricting Existing Districts 11' Gw Oa wa _a o, m � L� Cam Cielo 11 9s Rd p ° Liefer Rd 3 o N\co\a� N Loop Rd d e c S Loop Rd rist\an p\ �' o ]on C'n a�a deb G\e\O7161 as QS° 4• Via Norte Dr oso e�I �eQ�a C c Chant�jnj rWay 4 P1e o Rd �a �' Ot G aO�Ga ton W aY J deA Atey A a d r a /\ �� � Pr at�a Nicole) n ` act anQaSQ`'a\��Ja�`�� � o P e a a� ��= / `G Lr No �Q •9ti° Q�e�et� ° �s0 �D Ave Cima del � C L y DPI Corte Las ruces �e� ego trey �aa 5 1? 3 NU�be SQ< mOn St L pa d I \c aP a O /y Gm or - Cam Nunez a0- a\� n ec° �n Sene �e P ■ o ■ a v� _ �pa 9Pdd d C\\ FrayePacr 1-e Hill St `Rancho Vi yco McCaRosarCt o, VPr� St m 3 at�a Rosad° Ct Ria9P A w 0 Ga�\c a �d��d Tara St FOX R R ata\do a aro %� Ql ��5a o o d9 Cto �>Oadri t `0d6p nsador /a oQ< 010amp. Ma�°troy a OC Way to�eWin ay t O 2� �a aP Ga °\aid 79 �140 �tC,am Pi E y� Rojo ce St �IIJ° Ave deco°�stan�Ct " PwoO Ct V66 a LindaT' J� ttN O Ca o m Game pi @ d ' m L. o-- ® v Q� OS�a �II Emsq Ae G. 0 a d S id aoi a 1 4 d 00 o �d S d�7d�Jt°c Ja �c0 d CpJP �a �d 16 � e H pee u Qe Map layers Current v Census Block o Streets v Landmark Point Landmark Area Water Area National Demographics Corporation January 10, 2022 ©2021 CALIPER City of Temecula - Current Plan Category Field 1 2 3 4 5 Total 2020 Census Total Population 23,367 21,948 20,114 22,242 22,568 110,239 Population Deviation 1,319 -100 -1,934 194 520 3,253 Pct. Deviation 5.98% -0.45% -8.77% 0.88% 2.36% 14.75% Hispanic/Latino 26% 29% 24% 26% 34% 28% NH White 45% 47% 58% 56% 42% 49% Total Pop. NH Black 6% 5% 4% 5% 7% 5% NH Asian/Pac.Isl. 20% 15% 11% 11% 15% 15% NH Native Amer. 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Total 14,927 14,452 14,212 15,430 15,196 74,217 Hisp 22% 26% 22% 22% 29% 24% Citizen Voting Age Pop NH White 55% 57% 64% 65% 49% 58% NH Black 4% 6% 5% 5% 8% 6% Asian/Pac.Isl. 17% 11% 8% 8% 14% 12% Native Amer. 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Total 13,817 12,609 13,243 14,777 11,568 66,014 Latino est. 23% 23% 18% 19% 26% 21% Voter Registration Spanish -Surnamed 21% 21% 17% 17% 24% 20% (Nov 2020) Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% NH White est. 66% 68% 74% 75% 63% 70% NH Black 5% 7% 1 5% 4% 8% 1 6% Total 11,562 10,518 11,391 12,678 9,268 55,417 Latino est. 22% 21% 17% 17% 24% 20% Voter Turnout Spanish -Surnamed 20% 20% 16% 16% 22% 19% (Nov 2020) Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% NH White est. 66% 68% 74% 75% 63% 70% NH Black 5% 7% 5% 1 4% 8% 6% Total 6,996 6,267 7,611 8,345 5,454 34,673 Latino est. 19% 18% 15% 14% 21% 17% Voter Turnout Spanish -Surnamed 18% 17% 14% 14% 19% 16% (Nov 2018) Asian -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Filipino -Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% NH White est. 70% 71% 77% 78% 67% 73% NH Black est. 5% 6% 5% 4% 8% 5% age0-19 33% 32% 34% 25% 30% 31% Age age20-60 53% 54% 50% 53% 56% 53% age60plus 13% 13% 16% 21% 14% 16% Immigration Immigrants 18% 18% 12% 14% 18% 16% naturalized 67% 64% 69% 69% 54% 64% english 74% 75% 83% 80% 70% 76% Language spoken at spanish 12% 16% 10% 12% 20% 14% home asian-lang 9% 7% 5% 4% 7% 7% other lang 5% 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 9% 9% 5% 6% 9% 7% hs-grad 49% 50% 45% 47% 53% 49% (among Education those g bachelor 24% 21% 25% 22% 18% 22% age(25+) graduatedegree 12% 11% 15% 14% 11% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 54% 46% 47% 36% 43% 45% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 69% 65% 64% 1 68% 66% income 0-25k 6% 9% 5% 10% 14% 9% income 25-50k 8% 15% 11% 12% 17% 13% Household Income income 50-75k 18% 16% 13% 16% 16% 16% income 75-200k 52% 49% 56% 50% 44% 50% income 200k-plus 15% 11% 16% 1 13% 9% 12% single family 95% 78% 95% 940 53% 82% Housing Stats multi -family 5% 22% 5% 6% 47% 18% rented 24% 38% 21% 22% 62% 34% owned 76% 62% 79% 78% 1 38% 66% Total population data from California's adjusted 2020 Census data. Citizen Voting Age Population, Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Turnout and Registration data from California Statewide Database ("Latino" figures calculated by NDC using Census Bureau's Latino undercount by surname estimate). City of Temecula 2021 Redistricting Draft A reae m O ` aoOL 0 79 M a ..� FZQe��\r,��p�'Cc�P�0 sPc\, aQ t•-aaaai o H 'J IQ*�• anford pr Chant Way 0 >A r o_PpCv!Pfo 9• i fu Of V aa s� o J -"" 9s RdCam Ciel RaN Loop Rd e � S Loop Rdd oRo -1 ia Norte Wa Ser-e4 �P64 aJ de\ Rey da >�. pasQua\ Ra �\,� o �� ar r Vr �0¢G 0d �o 0 o<�sCass`e Cam Nune�YP�. Qj '. C1\ \aa90 e?.&C, o en�e �+65ea 3� Rancho Vi `• ascoC +� 3 0• ermost apt ado ��� Via Campo Gaeea i� cd k Ra `ell Ct, dn��d90 G C° �00Ra StunPescadoor�'toar�oJa ,or Ago pCa Way 5 oCeRdWi�S1 \ Yrye2 R 2 �0 RQ 79 qAo�k/Tty `�Ilejo Ave stiarce S Mdr �\ CO pia Rio I din �i C� 3 hill s� q Vid Saw , ..n. Or d6 t, rt /t -i �a Cir . T '� p > �ve Ot n , d00 3 � +� o - d,, 16 o SC I-- .a National Demographics Corporation January 19, 2022 ►5 • Map layers Draft A Current Streets Landmark Point Landmark Area Water Area • Council City of Temecula - Draft A Category Field 1 2 3 4 5 Total Total Population 21,648 22,469 21,312 22,242 22,568 110,239 2020 Census Population Deviation -400 421 -736 194 520 1,256 Pct. Deviation -1.81% 1.91% -3.34% 0.88% 2.36% 5.70% Hispanic/Latino 26% 29% 24% 26% 34% 28% NH White 44% 47% 58% 56% 42% 49% Total Pop. NH Black 6% 5% 4% 5% 7% 5% NH Asian/Pac.Isl. 20% 16% 12% 110/0 15% 15% NH Native Amer. 2% 1% 1 1% 1% 2% 1 2% Total 13,776 14,601 15,213 15,430 15,196 74,217 Hisp 22% 26% 22% 221/o 29% 24% Citizen Voting Age Pop NH White 55% 57% 63% 65% 49% 58% NH Black 5% 6% 5% 5% 8% 6% Asian/Pac.Isl. 17% 11% 91/0 8% 14% 12% Native Amer. 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% Total 12,690 12,992 13,987 14,777 11,568 66,014 Latino est. 23% 23% 18% 19% 26% 21% Voter Registration Spanish -Surnamed 21% 21% 16% 17% 24% 20% (Nov 2020) Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% NH White est. 66% 68% 74% 75% 63% 70% NH Black 6% 6% 6% 4% 8% 6% Total 10,581 10,868 12,022 12,678 9,268 55,417 Latino est. 22% 21% 17% 17% 24% 201/o Voter Turnout (Nov Spanish -Surnamed 21% 20% 16% 16% 22% 19% 2020) Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% NH White est. 66% 68% 74% 75% 63% 70% NH Black 6% 6% 6% 4% 8% 6% Total 6,373 6,451 8,050 8,345 5,454 34,673 Latino est. 20% 18% 15% 14% 21% 17% Spanish -Surnamed 18% 17% 14% 14% 19% 16% Voter Turnout (Nov 2018) Asian -Surnamed 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% Filipino -Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% NH White est. 70% 71% 76% 78% 67% 73% NH Black est. 5% 6% 6% 4% 8% 1 5% age0-19 34% 32% 34% 25% 30% 31% Age age20-60 53% 55% 50% 53% 56% 53% age60plus 13% 13% 16% 21% 14% 16% Immigration immigrants 18% 18% 12% 14% 18% 16% naturalized 67% 65% 69% 69% 54% 64% english 74% 74% 84% 800/0 70% 76% Language spoken at spanish 12% 16% 10% 12% 20% 14% home asian-lang 9% 7% 5% 4% 7% 7% other Lang 5% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well' 9% 9% 5% 6% 9% 7% hs-grad 49% 50% 44% 47% 53% 49% Education (among those 25+) bachelor 24% 21% 25% 22% 18% 22% age graduatedegree 12% 11% 15% 14% 11% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 55% 46% 47% 36% 43% 45% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 69% 1 64% 64% 68% 66% income 0-25k 6% 9% 5% 10% 14% 90/0 income 25-50k 9% 14% 11% 12% 17% 13% Household Income income 50-75k 19% 16% 13% 16% 16% 16% income 75-200k 52% 50% 56% 50% 44% 50% income 200k-plus 15% 11% 16% 13% 9% 1 12% single family 95% 78% 950/0 94% 53% 82% Housing Stars multi -family 5% 22% 5% 6% 47% 18% rented 25% 39% 21% 22% 62% 34% owned 75% 1 61% 1 79% 78% 38% 66% Total population data from California's adjusted 2020 Census data. Citizen Voting Age Population, Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Turnout and Registration data from California Statewide Database ("Latino" figures calculated by NDC using Census Bureau's Latino undercount by surname estimate). City of Temecula 2021 Redistricting Draft B f0 'F Cf Cam Cielo 4 p o Liefer Rd U 5 �a 9 a, n N�cO\a C 0 d � Oar a o ' 79 �aaa Stewart II q. Co ° °^Qa\� ac y2024 P\�O\�eQoSoPo< �ay ® ,Chant 5 e J�aVPJeono �e64 1�1 caeV ar m Rd eO� and �n Po �T Ot R p p A det day c m �i F 90 t�Z Nicole n ���Je °� o° c�a SgUa\�Avncy°c L a Pa�`te O N PJe Y°n Q-a q_ r R a9 PJewe, ° s0 ° La e ^� 5 a° 5 l J q Ave Cima del 00 F L J Vey cGreS ataa o aL VS Sy �a P a� ~4�2a°Q�� o Empire Crk a a� r° 0 - taco o m a �r Rd N Loop Rd S Loop Rd osXta5 J e< Cam Nunez a Pa GK, oeeac�eco 022ards QaHill St < oe O G � K\ o v w n° is— eo e Si C RaAcho Vi Sow � 3 3n 4 � � la Alturas Dr Gaga -3 w n d on�R� hwank Gay ed ° c� • o 2 2 Sdant Ikot't�aa pJ-,a o c Go CraPp a ttya elIe Ct o thgat Ave e, S(ah+ Rd v ° 1 CC C 0e6od C, \a°� K o ens r St Maot°Ja 5 a ° % c e cC '°yo�� a 4 C a Way co '44o\f Wins a 0 D d.o q Roo o- atiQ.! v °V, a �s m Cam Pi2trtr� J �Q 2 Ra Qo S'c 2 C�i I cY;e'° Ave deCooStance Marti ear Lp Go,,Q5 Vis Verd O'vga L. d o U Z o0' mac G�� p�t� ati �A d IS, d �aA� �taQ-aS ��a oo & e5t Ls ry Fa'a a cao Copper G<� `r vQ`ae J j a 16 Pia -a c v o� Map layers iE e Draft B U Streets m Landmark Point v Landmark Area F 3 Water Area D v a • Council Y .i5 1.�.ti Currents r! .. National Demographics Corporation January 10, 2022 02021 CALIPER City of Temecula - Draft B Category Field 1 2 3 4 5 Total Total Population 22,497 21,165 21,767 22,242 22,568 110,239 2020 Census Population Deviation 449 -883 -281 194 520 1,403 Pct. Deviation 2.04% -4.00% -1.27% 0.88% 2.36% 6.36% Hispanic/Latino 25% 31% 24% 26% 34% 28% NH White 45% 46% 58% 56% 42% 49% Total Pop. NH Black 6% 5% 4% 5% 7% 5% NH Asian/Pac.Isl. 20% 15% 12% 110/0 15% 15% NH Native Amer. 2% 1% 1 1% 1% 2% 1 2% Total 14,389 13,786 15,415 15,430 15,196 74,217 Hisp 21% 27% 22% 221/o 29% 24% Citizen Voting Age Pop NH White 55% 56% 63% 65% 49% 58% NH Black 5% 6% 5% 5% 8% 6% Asian/Pac.Isl. 17% 11% 91/0 8% 14% 12% Native Amer. 2% 1% 1 0% 1% 1% 1 1% Total 13,324 12,044 14,301 14,777 11,568 66,014 Latino est. 22% 24% 18% 19% 26% 21% Voter Registration Spanish -Surnamed 20% 22% 16% 17% 24% 20% (Nov 2020) Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% NH White est. 66% 67% 74% 75% 63% 70% NH Black 5% 6% 6% 4% 8% 6% Total 11,189 9,990 12,292 12,678 9,268 55,417 Latino est. 22% 22% 17% 17% 24% 201/o Voter Turnout (Nov Spanish -Surnamed 20% 21% 16% 16% 22% 19% 2020) Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% NH White est. 66% 67% 74% 75% 63% 70% NH Black 5% 6% 6% 4% 8% 6% Total 6,774 5,855 8,245 8,345 5,454 34,673 Latino est. 18% 20% 15% 14% 21% 17% Spanish -Surnamed 17% 18% 14% 14% 19% 16% Voter Turnout (Nov 2018) Asian -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Filipino -Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% NH White est. 70% 70% 76% 78% 67% 73% NH Black est. 5% 6% 6% 4% 8% 1 5% age0-19 34% 32% 34% 25% 30% 31% Age age20-60 53% 55% 50% 53% 56% 53% age60plus 13% 13% 16% 21% 14% 16% Immigration immigrants 18% 18% 12% 14% 18% 16% naturalized 68% 64% 69% 69% 54% 64% english 75% 73% 84% 800/0 70% 76% Language spoken at spanish 11% 17% 10% 12% 20% 14% home asian-lang 9% 7% 5% 4% 7% 7% other Lang 5% 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well' 8% 9% 5% 6% 9% 7% hs-grad 49% 50% 45% 47% 53% 49% Education (among those 25+) bachelor 24% 21% 25% 22% 18% 22% age graduatedegree 12% 11% 15% 14% 11% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 54% 46% 47% 36% 43% 45% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 69% 65% 64% 68% 66% income 0-25k 5% 10% 5% 10% 14% 90/0 income 25-50k 8% 15% 11% 12% 17% 13% Household Income income 50-75k 18% 16% 13% 16% 16% 16% income 75-200k 53% 49% 56% 50% 44% 50% income 200k-plus 16% 10% 16% 13% 9% 1 12% single family 95% 77% 95% 94% 53% 82% Housing Stars multi -family 5% 23% 5% 6% 47% 18% rented 24% 39% 21% 22% 62% 34% owned 76% 1 61% 79% 78% 38% 66% Total population data from California's adjusted 2020 Census data. Citizen Voting Age Population, Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Turnout and Registration data from California Statewide Database ("Latino" figures calculated by NDC using Census Bureau's Latino undercount by surname estimate). City of Temecula 2021 Redistricting m -` Jprin9s Draft C � Cam Cielo Rd p ° Liefer Rd 9 tC v c°�as�d N Loop Rd p tJ c obi �. Mo d9e 5 5 Loop t ��� Pl oW Rd m b� % Oar �aa o n Chrpeer \°o 19• )o P o 4 m 4 Via Norte ettie so f 4ac tand Dr J e\�ep� Chant Way A eOJe Pie C°J < Way � Pdel Rey Rd \a S ton ,aP� FOa0 Car t� Nicole n ca SQ�a\ �°� o� o r ° Q�eyet� ° �scoL Ave Cima d der ( y Oeimon ••;•'Corte L ruces dye a�° ° e �aa � a ���' NuR` � sOr •.t� St '1 Pa d Cam Nunez C; Sene �e P ■ p` ■ o aA � 901 °'s Cll Pray° ar 3 e°tie Q Hill St 0 5 4 3. dS O orte`Rla -\O K h, c� C,, a2, r V Fe N Qac ova ¢�� o Rancho Vi - a5Co McCaRosa Ct erg SF e■L�°'2P '1'fl..Cats ed/ Rosadst t F dt 9e p �� c Tr y O Ca o CO iarc m ok Rd �a ..-P.�� ° C�°G0 Cda/dbr4 °JF G_eta n� �.�' ores t ��p a OCi O 96 yLP Da � Qati C t4••;allejo Ave a. d nto ari a Or 4r Pensador St Ma°to a> g d 2 a Camp O Way St°rem Win�5�y Cam Pi ea Rojd Lyd, nce SaC Np0d P �F Mdoiew° .R rna \3ndaQata °<te CP 3 Ct 1 a pin a `oco C,/,. PIN v n Ember 01Q o o m S V O P 7 H C O 'gyp C C C Map layers 3 Draft C v ° Census Block Streets Landmark Point National Demographics Corporation January 10, 2022 Landmark Area Water Area Currents ©2021 CALIPER City of Temecula - Draft C Category Field 1 2 3 4 5 Total Total Population 22,148 22,253 22,130 22,005 21,703 110,239 2020 Census Population Deviation 100 205 82 -43 -345 550 Pct. Deviation 0.45% 0.93% 0.37% -0.20% -1.56% 2.49% Hispanic/Latino 25% 28% 23% 291/o 34% 28% NH White 45% 49% 60% 51% 42% 49% Total Pop. NH Black 6% 5% 4% 5% 6% 5% NH Asian/Pac.Isl. 20% 15% 110/0 12% 15% 150/0 NH Native Amer. 2% 2% 1 1% 1% 2% 1 2% Total 14,197 14,758 15,631 15,699 13,931 74,217 Hisp 211/6 26% 22% 25% 27% 24% Citizen Voting Age Pop NH White 55% 56% 66% 59% 52% 58% NH Black 4% 6% 4% 6% 8% 6% Asian/Pac.Isl. 17% 12% 89/o 100/0 12% 12% Native Amer. 2% 1% 1 0% 0% 1% 1 1% Total 13,102 13,256 14,915 13,816 10,925 66,014 Latino est. 22% 22% 17% 23% 24% 21% Voter Registration Spanish -Surnamed 20% 20% 15% 21% 22% 20% (Nov 2020) Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 1% 2% 3% 2% NH White est. 66% 68% 76% 70% 66% 70% NH Black 5% 6% 5% 5% 8% 6% Total 11,001 11,130 12,882 11,599 8,805 55,417 Latino est. 22% 21% 16% 21% 22% 201/o Voter Turnout (Nov Spanish -Surnamed 20% 19% 15% 20% 20% 19% 2020) Asian -Surnamed 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 10/0 2% 3% 2% NH White est. 66% 68% 76% 70% 66% 70% NH Black 5% 6% 5% 5% 8% 6% Total 6,645 6,733 8,823 7,382 5,090 34,673 Latino est. 19% 18% 14% 18% 19% 17% Spanish -Surnamed 17% 17% 13% 17% 17% 16% Voter Turnout (Nov 2018) Asian -Surnamed 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Filipino -Surnamed 3% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% NH White est. 70% 71% 79% 74% 70% 73% NH Black est. 5% 6% 4% 5% 8% 5% age0-19 34% 33% 31% 27% 32% 31% Age age20-60 53% 53% 500/0 54% 56% 53% age60plus 13% 14% 20% 19% 13% 16% Immigration immigrants 18% 17% 12% 14% 18% 16% naturalized 68% 68% 66% 68% 53% 64% english 75% 76% 83% 76% 72% 76% Language spoken at spanish 11% 14% 11% 15% 19% 14% home asian-lang 9% 7% 4% 6% 7% 7% other Lang 5% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well' 8% 9% 6% 6% 8% 7% hs-grad 49% 47% 44% 50% 54% 49% Education (among those 25+) bachelor 24% 23% 25% 20% 18% 22% age graduatedegree 12% 13% 16% 12% 10% 13% Child in Household child-underl8 54% 51% 40% 38% 44% 45% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65% 66% 63% 66% 70% 66% income 0-25k 5% 7% 7% 11% 14% 90/0 income 25-50k 8% 12% 11% 13% 18% 13% Household Income income 50-75k 18% 14% 14% 16% 17% 16% income 75-200k 53% 54% 55% 48% 42% 50% income 200k-plus 16% 13% 14% 12% 8% 1 12% single family 95% 91% 96% 829/o 49% 82% Housing Stars multi -family 5% 9% 4% 18% 51% 18% rented 24% 29% 19% 37% 60% 34% owned 76% 1 71% 81% 63% 40% 66% Total population data from California's adjusted 2020 Census data. Citizen Voting Age Population, Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. Turnout and Registration data from California Statewide Database ("Latino" figures calculated by NDC using Census Bureau's Latino undercount by surname estimate). Item No. 12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance Amending Title 15 and Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code Pertaining to (1) Large Family Daycare Homes, (2) Clarify the Standards that Apply to Senior Housing, Transitional Housing, Supportive Housing, Emergency Shelters, Trash Enclosures, Self -Storage or Mini -Warehouse Facilities and to Projects Using the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, (3) Establish Standards and Requirements for Dedications and Improvements for Developments Without a Subdivision, (4) Update How Development Impact Fees Can Be Used, (5) Clarify Where Artificial Turf Can Be Installed, and (6) Make Minor Typographical Edits and Finding the Ordinance to be Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3) PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 15 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) COMPLY WITH STATE LAW CHANGES TO LARGE FAMILY DAYCARE HOMES, (2) CLARIFY THE STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO SENIOR HOUSING, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING, SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, SELF -STORAGE OR MINI -WAREHOUSE FACILITIES AND TO PROJECTS USING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, (3) ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT A SUBDIVISION, (4) UPDATE HOW DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CAN BE USED, (5) CLARIFY WHERE ARTIFICIAL TURF CAN BE INSTALLED, AND (6) MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: An Ordinance amending Title 15 and Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code related to (1) comply with state law changes to large family daycare homes, (2) clarify the standards that apply to senior housing, transitional housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, trash enclosures, self -storage or mini -warehouse facilities and to projects using the affordable housing overlay zone, (3) establish standards and requirements for dedications and improvements for developments without a subdivision, (4) update how development impact fees can be used, (5) clarify where artificial turf can be installed, and (6) make minor typographical edits. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula City Council adopted the Municipal Code in January 1990. Since its adoption, the City Council has periodically made amendments to various sections of the Code to improve its clarity, make corrections and to make necessary additions. The proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code include amendments to Title 15 (Building and Construction) and Title 17 (Zoning). The proposed amendments are not substantial policy changes and do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed in accordance with the Municipal Code. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65800, the Planning Commission is required to review and make recommendations to the City Council regarding zoning regulations and amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code. On December 1, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted resolution number 2021-41 recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to Title 15 and Title 17. Listed briefly below are the proposed changes to Title 15 and Title 17 of the Municipal Code. 1. Updates to Senior Housing/Congregate Care Facilities. The proposed changes further clarify development requirements for Senior Housing/Congregate Care Facilities within the Public/Institutional zoning district. 2. Updates to transitional housing, supportive housing, and emergency shelters. The State of California passed Assembly Bill 139 ("AB 139") which adjusts how a city may regulate transitional and supportive housing. Additionally, the City's 5th and 6th Cycle Housing Element require the City to update the Municipal Code to comply with state law. The proposed changes require the City to treat supportive and transitional housing in a manner that is similar to a single- family residence. 3. Updates to emergency shelters. The State of California passed AB-139 which adjusts how a city may regulate emergency shelters. Additionally, the City's 5th and 6th Cycle Housing Element require the City to update the Municipal Code to comply with state law. The proposed changes require robust standards for emergency shelters, which include occupancy standards, lighting, spacing, staffing ratios, security personnel requirements, among several other requirements that allow the City to ensure that emergency shelters are operated in safe manner. 4. Updates to trash enclosures. Trash enclosures are required for new residential, commercial, and industrial development. Staff has received feedback from our Code Enforcement team that illegal waste dumping and illegal access to trash enclosures are becoming more common. Additionally, federal and state water quality standards require pollutants to be addressed from trash enclosures. The proposed changes will impose standards that enhance safety, reduce illegal entry/dumping, reduce potential pollutants, and provide consistency to applicants that are building trash enclosures within the City of Temecula. 5. Updates to self -storage or mini -ware house facilities. The proposed changes further clarify existing requirements. 6. Updates to projects using the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The proposed changes reinforce Affordable Housing Overlay Zone requirements for properties located within the Public/Institutional zoning district. 7. Updates to Large Family Daycare facilities. The State of California passed Senate Bill 234 ("SB-234") which removed zoning permit and business license requirements for Large Family Daycare facilities. The proposed changes consolidate Small and Large Family Daycare facilities into one use and further clarifies that these uses are permitted by right. Staff has confirmed that licensing and inspections will still occur through the State of California and the Fire Prevention Division. 8. Updates to Accessory Dwelling Unit Language. The proposed change removes antiquated "Secondary Dwelling Unit" language from the Municipal Code. The changes also further clarify the components of a kitchen. 9. Updates to artificial/synthetic turf. The proposed changes re -affirm that artificial/synthetic turf is not a plant. The changes further clarify that artificial/synthetic turf is permitted for bona fide recreational facilities and single-family homes. 10. Updates to Title 15 establishing standards and requirements for dedications and improvements for developments without a subdivision as well as language to update how development impact fees can be used. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed ordinance does not have a direct fiscal impact, if adopted. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Planning Commission Agenda Report 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-41 4. Notice of Public Hearing 5. Notice of Exemption ORDINANCE NO.2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 15 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) COMPLY WITH STATE LAW CHANGES TO LARGE FAMILY DAYCARE HOMES, (2) CLARIFY THE STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO SENIOR HOUSING, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING, SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, SELF -STORAGE OR MINI - WAREHOUSE FACILITIES AND TO PROJECTS USING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, (3) ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT A SUBDIVISION, (4) UPDATE HOW DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CAN BE USED, (5) CLARIFY WHERE ARTIFICIAL TURF CAN BE INSTALLED, AND (6) MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make minor revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 15 (Building and Construction), and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code. B. The code amendments are being made to address changes in State law where the City is now preempted from regulating large day care homes. In addition, this Ordinance amends the code to address and reflect the City's standard pattern and practice with respect to (1) improvements for developments without subdivisions (2) use of development impact fees, (3) the standards that apply to senior housing, transitional housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, trash enclosures, and self -storage or mini -warehouse facilities, and (4) the standards that apply to projects in the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The code amendment also reaffirms when artificial turf can be installed and amends the definition of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. Finally, the code amendment makes minor typographical edits to the code. C. As required by State law, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Ordinance") on December 1, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2021-41, recommending that the City Council approve the code amendments. E. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on , 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. F. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the general plan. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be treated as any other residential use would be treated. The proposed revisions to transitional and supportive housing clarify the standards that apply to these uses and are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. All other proposed amendments are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are consistent with Goal 5 of the Growth Management/Public Facilities element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to ensure "Public and quasi -public facilities and services that provide for the social, cultural, civic, and religious, and recreational needs of the community." As a quasi -public facility, day care homes provide needed services to residents who may require day care services. For transitional, supportive, and emergency shelter facilities, Housing Element Policy 2.4 of the General Plan states, "Pursue all available forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development and implementation of the City's housing programs." The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." The remaining proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code are minor 2 clarifications and typographical edits and do not result in a contrary policy direction, or indicate an inconsistency between the Temecula Municipal Code and the adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be as treated as any other residential use would be treated. Changes to transitional and supportive housing are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." All other proposed amendments are clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Municipal Code amendments would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, changes required by state law or revisions that reflect the City's standard practice and patterns, and clarifications or typographical corrections, which do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Table 17.03.010 (Planning and Zoning Approval Authority) of Section 17.03.010 (Purpose and intent) of Chapter 17.03 (Administration of Zoning) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.03.010 remaining unchanged: Table 17.03.010 Planning and Zoning Approval Authority Application Administrative Planning Planning City Approval Director Commission Council General plan amendment Recommendation) X1 Zoning amendment: text 1 Recommendation X1 changes Zoning amendment: map Recommendation) X1 changes 3 Zoning amendment: specific plan, includes specific plan amendments Recommendation' X1 Conditional use permit— existing building 1 2 X Conditional use permit with a development plan 1 2 3 X ° ° 1 3 X Development plan (10,000 sq. ft. or greater) X i Development plan (less than 10,000 sq. ft.) X1 Major modifications X2°4 X IA Minor modifications X2 Administrative development plan X2 Home occupation plan X2 day heffie X - - �family eaf:e y Minor exceptions X2 Sign permits X2 Sign programs, including sign program modifications X2 Temporary use permits X2 Variance X1 Seeendafy ' Accessory Dwelling Unit Xs Hillside development permit X1 Section 5. Table 17.06.030 (Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.030 (Use regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.06.030 remaining unchanged: Table 17.06.030 Residential Districts Description of Use I HR I RR I VL I L- I L- I LM I M H HR-SMy 1 2 Residential Single-family detached P P P P P P P - P Duplex (two-family dwellings) - - - -2 -2 -2 P P - Single-family attached (greater than P P P two units) Multiple -family - - - - - - P P - Manufactured homes P P P P P P P P P Mobilehome park - - C8 C C C C C - Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or dependent or neglected P P P P P P P P P children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or dependent or neglected C C C C C C P P C children (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or P P P P P P P P P treatment facility (six or fewer) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or C C C8 C C C P P C treatment facility (seven or more) Description of Use (residential HR RR VL L L LM M H HR-SM9 continued) 1 2 Residential care facilities for the P P P p P P P P P elderly (six or fewer) Residential care facilities for the C C C C C C P P C elderly (seven or more) Residential care facilities (six or P P P P P P P P P fewer) Residential care facilities (seven or C C C C C C C P C more) Congregate care residential facilities _ P P p p for the elderly Rooming and boarding house - - - - - - C C - Accessory dwelling units P P P P P P P P P Guest house P P P P P P P4 P4 P Family day care homes —small and P P P P P P P P P large Family cafe iefnes_ -crrgc} P P P P P P P P P Day care centers C C C C C C C C C Bed and breakfast establishments C C C C C C C C C Emergency shelters C C C8 C C C P P C Transitional housing i G P — G P Es P C P C P EP — P P EP — Supportive housing'2 EP G P C- P C P C P EP P P EP Efficiency units - - - - - - P P - Nonresidential Agriculture/open space uses6 P P P P P P P P C Religious institutions C C C C C C C C C Public utility facilities C C C C C C C C C Educational institutions C C C C C C C C C Libraries C C C, C C C C C - Commercial marijuana activity - - - - - - - - - Marijuana cultivation10 - - - - - - - - - Medical marijuana dispensaries - - - - - - - - - Museums and art galleries (not for profit) C C C8 C C C C C - Kennels and catteries6 C C C - - - - - - Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats P P P P P - - - P Temporary real estate tract offices P P P P P P P P P Recreational vehicle storage yard - C C8 C C C C C - Parking for commercial uses - - - - - - P P - Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls - - - - - - P P - Convalescent facilities - - - - - - P P - Golf courses C C C8 C C C C C - Home occupations P P P P P P P P P Construction trailers',6 P P P P P P P P P Short-term rentals - - - - - - - - - Notes: 12. Transitional housingand nd supportive housing shall be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Section 6. Table 17.06.050A (Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L- 1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning District) of Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.06.050A remaining unchanged: Table 17.06.050A Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L-1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts Accessory Structure Carports Detached guest house Garage Storage/utility enclosure Swimming pool Swimming pool equipment Spa Antennas Gazebo/garden structure Solar collector (ground mounted) Decks not too ee gre (not to exceed 36 inches above the round Front Yard Not permitted Not permitted in the actual front yard' 20 ft. (Entrance faces street) 10 ft. (Entrance from side not facing front yard) Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted in front yard Not permitted Rear Yard 5 ft. min. for support columns Refer to the rear yard setbacks in Table 17.06.040 5 ft. min., but no less than 15 ft. from centerline of alley 3 ft. 5 ft. to water's edge 3 ft. 3 ft. to water's edge 5 ft. 5 ft. 1n 44 n;,-. 5 ft. min. Interior Side Yardl 5 ft. min. for support columns Refer to the side yard setbacks in Table 17.06.040 5 ft. min. 3 ft. 5 ft. to water's edge 3 ft. 3 ft. to water's edge 5 ft. 5 ft. if interior side yard 10 ft. if street side yard on corner lot 1n4 n;r 5 ft. min. Must meet district development standards (i.e. setbacks, height, coverage, etc.) 7 Table 17.06.050A Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L-1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts Accessory Structure Front Yard Rear Yard Interior Side Yardl Patio covers 15 ft. 5 ft. min. 5 ft. min. measured at vertical supports Section 7. Subsection "I" (Family Day Care Home Facilities) of Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Zoning Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety, with all other provisions of Section 17.06.050 remaining unchanged. Section 8. Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to change any reference to the terms "Alcoholism and/or drug treatment facility" or "Alcoholism or drug treatment facility" to "Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility". Section 9. Subsection "M" of Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplement Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text) with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "M. Senior Housing/Congregate Care Facilities. Senior housing and congregate care facilities are permitted in the zoning districts identified in the land use tables, subject to the approval of a development plan. Senior housing and congregate care facilities shall comply with the following: 1. Senior housing shall comply with all the provisions of the development code, unless modified by the following provisions: a. The maximum densities for senior housing are as follows: i. In the high density residential zoning district and the community commercial, highway tourism, service commercial, public/institutional district, and professional office zoning districts, the maximum density shall be thirty units per acre. ii. In the medium density residential zoning district and the neighborhood commercial zoning district, the maximum density shall be twenty units per acre. iii. In the low medium residential zoning district, the maximum density shall be eight units per acre. b. The net livable area for each dwelling unit shall not be less than four hundred square feet for an efficiency unit, five hundred fifty square feet for a one -bedroom unit, and seven hundred square feet for a two -bedroom unit. Kitchenettes may be permitted, provided they are sized to meet the immediate needs of the occupants of the unit. c. Senior housing shall comply with the requirements for senior housing developments set forth in Civil Code Section 51.3 et seq. 2. Congregate care projects shall comply with all the provisions of the development code unless modified by the following provisions: a. The maximum densities for congregate care facilities are not limited specifically to density requirements so long as all the site development standards are met (i.e., required setbacks, parking, landscaping, open space, etc.). b. The disabled units shall comply with the standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The provisions of this subsection shall apply to all approved specific plans within the city of Temecula, unless the specific plan contains specific standards for the type of housing being considered." Section 10. Subsection "N" of Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "N. Self -Storage or Mini -Warehouse Facilities. 1. Development Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new self - storage or mini -warehouse facilities: a. The design of the facility shall be compatible with the surrounding area in terms of design, bulk and mass, materials and colors. Building exteriors shall not be corrugated metal or similar surface, but shall be of finished quality. Metal containers are prohibited; b. In commercial zoning districts the rear and side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten feet. In industrial zoning districts no rear or side yard setbacks are required. The director of planning may increase the setbacks to a maximum of twenty-five feet when adjacent to an existing residential development project. The front yard setback shall maintain the setback for the underlying zoning classification; c. The maximum lot coverage and floor area ratio (FAR) shall be sixty-five percent; d. The development site shall provide a minimum of ten percent landscaped open space for a project within commercial districts. In industrial districts, the total landscaping shall be equal to the required setback areas. No interior landscaping is required, but the setback areas shall be landscaped; e. A manager's residential unit may be provided, but is not required; f. Required parking spaces may not be rented as, or used for, vehicular storage. However, additional parking area may be provided for vehicles, boats, buses, trailers, etc., provided that the storage area is adequately screened from public view with enhanced landscaping, decorative walls, fences, or other methods as deemed appropriate by the director. 2. Performance and Use Regulations. a. Any business activity, other than rental of storage units, including the on -site sale of merchandise or garage sales, and transfer/storage businesses which utilize vehicles as part of the business is prohibited. No servicing or repair of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers, or any similar equipment is permitted. b. Storage units shall not be used for the storage of flammable liquids, highly combustible or explosive materials, or hazardous chemicals. c. Truck or vehicle rental is prohibited without obtaining all necessary approvals subject to the development code schedule of permitted uses." Section 11. A new Subsection "R" is hereby added to Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "R. Emergency Shelters. Emergency shelters shall be allowed in accordance with the land use table for the specific zone and provided that the following development standards are met: 1. The minimum floor area per occupant shall beat least one hundred fifty (150) square feet and the maximum number of occupants to be served at any given time shall not exceed fifty (50). 2. A minimum distance of three hundred feet (300') shall be maintained from any other emergency shelter. 3. The maximum stay per occupant at the facility shall not exceed ninety (90) days in a three hundred sixty five (365) day period. 4. On site client waiting and intake areas shall be located inside the building and shall be screened from public and private property where feasible. If not feasible, an exterior waiting area shall be provided that (a) contains a minimum of ten (10) square feet per bed provided at the facility; (b) is in a location not adjacent to the public right of way; and (c) is visibly separated from public view by a minimum six foot (6) tall visual screening. 5. A minimum of one employee per fifteen (15) beds shall be on duty and remain on site during operational hours whenever clients are on the site. Licensed security personnel shall also be provided during operational hours whenever clients are on the site and when people are waiting outside the facility. The licensed security personnel shall be in addition to the minimum employee requirement set forth above. 6. Exterior lighting shall be provided for the entire outdoor area of the site, and shall be stationary, shielded, and directed away from adjacent properties and public rights of way. Lighting should be provided at a minimum illumination of one footcandle across parking areas and two footcandles at entrances. 7. A minimum of one parking space for every ten (10) beds, plus one-half (1/2) parking space for each bedroom designated for families with children, plus one parking space for each 10 employee/volunteer on duty, shall be maintained. The number of parking spaces may be reduced by twenty-five percent (25%) if the shelter is located within one thousand feet (1,000') of a public transit stop. Bicycle rack parking shall also be provided at the facility. 8. The facility may provide the following services and facilities to clients in a designated area separate from the sleeping areas: a. A recreation area either inside or outside the shelter. If located outside, the area shall be screened from public view with landscaping. b. A counseling center for job placement, educational, healthcare, legal, or mental health services. c. Laundry facilities to serve the occupants at the shelter. d. A kitchen for the preparation of meals. e. A dining hall. f. Client storage areas (i.e., for the overnight storage of bicycles and personal items). 9. The operator of the facility shall provide, at the city's request, an annual report of the use of the facility and determination of compliance with the city's development standards for the use. 10. A management plan shall be submitted to be reviewed, approved, and enforced by the director of community development. The management plan shall be approved before issuance of a building permit (including those building permits solely utilized for occupancy only). The management plan shall be comprehensive and shall address, at a minimum, hours of operation, eligibility requirements, admission hours and process, staff training, case management, neighborhood outreach and privacy, resident counseling and treatment, maintenance plans, residency and guest rules and procedures including rules pertaining to drugs, alcohol, tobacco, weapons and fraternization, staffing and volunteer needs, including job descriptions, procedures related to families with children, policies related to personal effects, disciplinary procedures, safety policy, grievance procedures, and emergency preparedness plan." Section 12. A new Subsection "S" is hereby added to Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "S. Trash Enclosures Trash enclosures shall be designed in a manner that incorporates the following requirements: 1. Trash enclosures shall be designed in a size, manner, and location that is approved by the City's trash purveyor and the City. 2. Trash enclosures shall be designed in accordance with the City's most recent design standards. 3. Trash enclosures shall incorporate architectural design features from the surrounding architecture, including finishes, roofing, and colors. 4. Trash enclosures shall incorporate a solid (non -permeable) roof and working interior illumination (a minimum of one foot candle throughout the interior). IF 5. Trash enclosures shall have working locking mechanisms on all access gates, including pedestrian access gates, that shall remain locked and accessible only to authorized users (residents, commercial tenants, etc.) during times when pick-up service is not scheduled. 6. Trash enclosures shall have anti -dumping design features incorporated into the design of the trash enclosure, which prevent (a) the transfer of materials over or around the trash enclosure, and (b) the unauthorized entry into any portion of the trash enclosure or unauthorized dumping. Anti -dumping features must be designed in complimentary design manner to the existing or proposed building, and shall not include chain link fence, razor wire, or barbed wire. 7. When required by the Public Works Department, the trash enclosures shall have a drain that is tied into the sewer purveyor and designed to the sewer purveyor's standards. 8. When required by the Public Works Department, trash enclosures shall have a functioning hose bib located within the interior of the trash enclosure to keep the trash enclosure free of potential pollutants. The hose bib shall have a detachable key and/or locking mechanism. The hose bib shall be designed in a manner where the hose bib is protected from damage occurring from normal operations by location or another physical barrier. 9. Upgrades to existing trash enclosures may be required as determined by the Public Works Director, based upon the scope of tenant improvements to an existing building, building additions or other similar modifications. Tenant improvements at restaurants, automobile repair facilities, and other uses with a higher likelihood of pollutants will require upgrades to the existing trash enclosures." Architectural Roof s - ` Durable Doors with Locking - Anti -dumping r� Mechanism l��ls. r Features Matching Building Finishes(Stucco, Brick, Etc.) SAWLE TRASH ENCLOSURE Section 13. Note 4 of Table 17.12.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses— Public/Institutional Districts.) of Section 17.12.030 (Use Regulations) of Chapter 17.12 (Public/Institutional District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby 12 amended to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.12.030 remaining unchanged: "4. Residential, multiple -family housing shall be allowed in the PI zone only if W the affordable housing overlay (AHO) applies to the property, (2) the proposed development complies with all of the requirements of the High Density Residential District Standards outlined in Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards — Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.040 (Development Standards) and (33,) the proposed development complies with all requirements of Chapter 17.21." Section 14. Table 17.12.040 (Development Standards — Public Institutional Districts) of Section 17.12.040 (Development Standards) of Chapter 17.12 (Public/Institutional District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new note 1 to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text): GG Table 17.12.040 Development Standards—Public/Institutional Districts Development Standard' PI District Minimum lot size 7,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot width 50 ft. Minimum lot depth 100 ft. Maximum lot coverage 35% Floor area ratio 0.3 Setbacks': Front yard 20 ft. Interior side yard 5 ft. Street side yard 15 ft. Rear yard 15 ft. Rear yard —adjacent to alley or street 20 ft. Minimum landscape coverages 25% Note: 1. Residential. multiple-familv housing utilizing the affordable housing overlav (AHO) shall comply with all of the requirements of the High Density Residential District Standards outlined in Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards — Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.040 (Development Standards) and the development shall comply with all reauirements of Chapter 17.21." Section 15. Table 17.22.116 (Schedule of Permitted Uses Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay District-2) of Section 17.22.116 (Use regulations.) of Chapter 17.21 (Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO-)) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and 13 additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.22.116 remaining unchanged: Table 17.22.116 Schedule of Permitted Uses Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay District-2 Description of Use PDO-2 Residential Single-family detached P1 Duplex (two-family dwellings) P1 Single-family attached (greater than two units) P Multiple -family P Manufactured homes P Mobilehome park - Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled or dependent or neglected children (six or fewer) P Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled or dependent or neglected children (seven to twelve) P Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or fewer) P Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility seven or more P Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or more) P Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly P Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities C Secondary dwelling units - Guest house P3 Family day care homes —small and large P Family y ea,.o > efne& 1arge R Day care centers C Bed and breakfast establishments Emergency shelters P Transitional housing P Nonresidential Agriculture/open space uses P Religious institutions - Public utility facilities - Educational institutions - Public libraries C Public museums and art galleries (not forprofit) - Kennels and catteries - Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats - Temporary real estate tract offices P Recreational vehicle storage yard CZ 14 Parking for commercial uses I- Section 16. Section 17.23.020 (Definitions) of Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text) with all other provisions of Section 17.23.020 remaining unchanged: "Accessory dwelling unit" or "ADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code section 65852.2, as the same may be amended from time to time. An Accessory dwelling unit contains a kitchen, which may include plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and/or physical space set aside for cooking or meal preparation facilities, which may include space for a refrigerator, sink, wet bar. and/or dishwasher. "Attached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a physical expansion (i.e. addition) of the primary dwelling and shares a common wall with the primary dwelling. "Detached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a separate structure from the primary dwelling, which does not share any walls with the primary dwelling. "Existing structure" means an existing single-family dwelling or other accessory structure that can be safely converted into habitable space under the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the city, and other applicable law. "Junior accessory dwelling unit" or "JADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 65852.22, as the same may be amended from time to time. A : u� nior accessory dwelling unit contains at least an efficiency kitchen, which may include plumbing_, electrical, mechanical, and/or physical space set aside for cooking or meal preparation facilities, which may include space for a refrigerator, sink, wet bar, and/or dishwasher. "Primary dwelling", for purposes of this chapter, means the existing or proposed single- family dwelling on the lot where an ADU would be located. "Public transit", for purposes of this chapter, has the meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 65852.20), as the same may be amended from time to time. Section 17. Subsection "K" of Section 17.32.060 (Landscape Design Requirements.) of Chapter 17.32 (Water Efficient Landscape Design) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new number "9" to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.32.060 remaining unchanged: "9. Artificial/synthetic turf is not a permitted plant material in commercial, industrial, or mixed -use zones and/or multi -family projects. Green artificial turf may be permitted in commercial, industrial, and/or mixed -use zones or multi -family projects when utilized for bona fide recreational facilities such as a sports field. Green artificial/synthetic turf is a permitted non - plant material for single family homes when used in place of a lawn or other landscaped area of the home." 15 Section 18. The Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 15.07 (Dedications and Improvements Where No Subdivision is Involved) to Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) which shall read as follows: "Chapter 15.07 Dedications and Improvements Where No Subdivision is Involved 15.07.010 Purpose. 15.07.020 Dedications required. 15.07.030 Design of public improvements and security. 15.07.040 Deferrals of Public Improvement Requirements. 15.07.050 Exemption for Expansion of Existing Single Family Homes. 15.07.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards and requirements for dedications and improvements in connection with the development of land in which no subdivision is involved. 15.07.020 Dedications required. A. Applicants who propose new development within the city shall provide, by means of an offer of dedication or other appropriate conveyance as approved by the city attorney, the rights -of -way necessary for the construction of any street, trail, and/or bicycle path as shown on the circulation plan in the general plan or any supplemental document identified in the general plan, any applicable specific plan, or as otherwise required by the city engineer in connection with a land use entitlement pursuant to Title 17. Rights -of -way shall also be provided for improvements to existing facilities including rights -of -way for storm drains, trails, bicycle paths, or other required public facilities. All rights -of -way shall be accompanied by a title examination report and be free of all liens and encumbrances. Dedications required by this section shall be made before the issuance of a building permit for a subject property. 15.07.030 Design of public improvements and security. A. Public Improvements. Applicants shall construct public improvements to city standards and shall comply with the requirements set forth in Section 16.30.080, with the following modifications: 1. Any reference to "tentative map" or "final or parcel map" is replaced with "land use entitlement"; and 2. Any reference to "subdivider" is replaced with "applicant" B. Security. Applicants are required to guarantee the construction of public improvements by executing an improvement agreement secured by a bond or cash deposit before issuance of a building permit for the subject property. If the building permit is not exercised, the improvement obligation shall terminate and the security shall be returned. The city engineer is authorized to execute agreements on behalf of the city. The improvement agreement and security 16 shall comply with the requirements set forth in Section 16.30.100 (A) through (E) with the following modifications: 1. Any reference to "subdivision improvement agreement" is replaced with "improvement agreement"; 2. Any reference to "subdivider" is replaced with "applicant"; 3. The reference in Section 16.30.100(B) to agreements being executed by "those parties executing the final or parcel map" shall be replaced with "the applicant"; and 4. The reference in Section 16.30.100(C) to "final tract map, parcel map waiver, lot line adjustment, or lot merger" is replaced with "land use entitlement". 15.07.040 Deferrals of Public Improvement Requirements. Any required frontage improvements may be deferred when deemed appropriate by the city engineer. Deferral shall be allowed only when the city engineer finds that construction is impractical due to physical constraints. When improvements are deferred, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city for the installation of all frontage improvements at a future date as determined by the city engineer. The agreement shall be approved by the city attorney. The agreement shall provide for the following: A. Construction of required improvements shall begin within ninety (90) days of the receipt of notice to proceed from the city engineer; B. In the event of default by the applicant or successors, the city is authorized to cause the construction to be done and charge the entire cost and expense to the applicant or successors, including interest from the date of notice of the cost and expense until paid; C. The agreement shall be recorded with the county recorder, at the expense of the applicant, and shall constitute: 1. Notice to all successors of title to the real property of the obligation; and 2. A lien in an amount to fully reimburse the city for the cost of constructing the improvements, including interest as outlined above, subject to foreclosure in the event of default in payment. D. In the event of litigation caused by a default of the applicant or successors, the applicant or successors agree to pay all costs involved, including reasonable attorney's fees, which shall become a part of the lien against the real property; E. The term "applicant" shall include not only the present owner but also heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns, with the intent that the obligations undertaken shall run with the real property and constitute a lien against it: and F. Other provisions deemed necessary by the city engineer. 15.07.050 Exemption for Expansion of Existing Single Family Homes. A. The following developments shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter to construct street improvements: The addition, enlargement, expansion, alteration, extension, reconstruction or replacement of any existing single family dwelling and/or accessory 17 structure up to a maximum increase in square footage of 25% to the existing dwelling or structure 2. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit up to 1,200 square feet in size. 3. The development of non -habitable accessory structure(s) as provided for under Section 17.06.050 of this Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts). B. A development that is exempt from the requirement to construct street improvements as provided for in this section shall remain subject to the requirement to provide the city with an irrevocable offer of dedication for the ultimate street right-of-way for any addition, enlargement, expansion, alteration, extension, reconstruction or replacement of an existing single family dwelling and/or habitable accessory structure regardless of size. C. No exemption from the requirement to construct street improvements shall be granted if the city engineer determines that the lack of street improvements in this case would be a potential danger to the public health, safety, and welfare." Section 19. Section 15.06.060 (Use of Funds.) of Chapter 15.06 (Public Facilities Development Impact Fee) of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby renamed "Accounting and Use of Development Impact Fees, and amended in its entirety to read as follows: "The City shall establish separate accounts for each category of development impact fee established by the City Council and deposit development impact fees collected into the appropriate account. The money deposited into these accounts, and any interest earnings thereon, shall be used solely for the public improvements, public services, and community amenities for which the development impact fees were imposed. Development impact fees may be used to pay the principal, interest and other costs of bonds, notes and other obligations issued or undertaken by or on behalf of the City to finance such improvements, services and amenities." Section 20. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. Section 21. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 22. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. 18 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2022. ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 19 Matt Rahn, Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 251h day of January, 2022, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 20 Randi Johl, City Clerk STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: December 1, 2021 PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Long Range Planning Project Number LR20-1223, a resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled, "An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending Titles 15 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to (1) comply with state law changes to large family day care homes, (2) clarify the standards that apply to senior housing, transitional housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, trash enclosures, self -storage or mini -warehouse facilities and to projects using the affordable housing overlay zone, (3) establish standards and requirements for dedications and improvements for developments without a subdivision, (4) update how development impact fees can be used, (5) clarify where artificial turf can be installed, and (6) make minor typographical edits and finding that this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15061 (b)(3)" RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Planning Commission Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance. CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15061 (b)(3) BACKGROUND SUMMARY The City of Temecula City Council adopted the Municipal Code in January 1990. Since its adoption, the City Council has periodically made amendments to various sections of the Code to improve its clarity, make corrections and to make necessary additions. The proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code include amendments to Title 15 and Title 17. The proposed amendments are not substantial policy changes and do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed in accordance with the Municipal Code. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65800, the Planning Commission is required to review and make recommendations to the City Council regarding zoning regulations and amendments to Title 17 (Development Code) of the Temecula Municipal Code. As such, this staff report only addresses proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code. The remaining proposed amendments to Title 15 will be considered by the City Council. The proposed amendments to the other title of the Temecula Municipal Code are included in the attached draft Ordinance for the Planning Commission's review but are not reflected in this staff report. Listed briefly below are the proposed changes to Title 17 of the Municipal Code, each of which is discussed in greater detail below. Listed briefly below are the proposed changes to Title 17 of the Municipal Code. 1. Updates to Senior Housing/Congregate Care Facilities. The proposed changes further clarify development requirements for Senior Housing/Congregate Care Facilities within the Public/Institutional zoning district. 2. Updates to transitional housing, supportive housing, and emergency shelters. The State of California passed AB-139 which adjusts how a city may regulate transitional and supportive housing. Additionally, the City's 5th and 6th Cycle Housing Element require the City to update the Municipal Code to comply with state law. The proposed changes require the City to treat supportive and transitional housing in a manner that is similar to a single- family residence. 3. Updates to emergency shelters. The State of California passed AB- 139 which adjusts how a city may regulate emergency shelters. Additionally, the City's 5th and 6th Cycle Housing Element require the City to update the Municipal Code to comply with state law. The proposed changes require robust standards for emergency shelters, which include occupancy standards, lighting, spacing, staffing ratios, security personnel requirements, among several other requirements that allow the City to ensure that emergency shelters are operated in safe manner. 4. Updates to trash enclosures. Trash enclosures are required for new residential, commercial, and industrial development. Staff has received feedback from our Code Enforcement team that illegal waste dumping and illegal access to trash enclosures are becoming more common. Additionally, federal and state water quality standards require pollutants to be addressed from trash enclosures. The proposed changes will impose standards that enhance safety, reduce illegal entry/dumping, reduce potential pollutants, and provide consistency to applicants that are building trash enclosures within the City of Temecula. 5. Updates to self -storage or mini -ware house facilities. The proposed changes further clarify existing requirements. 6. Updates to projects using the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The proposed changes reinforce Affordable Housing Overlay Zone requirements for properties located within the Public/Institutional zoning district. 2 7. Updates to Large Family Daycare facilities. The State of California passed SB-234 which removed zoning permit and business license requirements for Large Family Daycare facilities. The proposed changes consolidate Small and Large Family Daycare facilities into one use and further clarifies that these uses are permitted by right. Staff has confirmed that licensing and inspections will still occur through the State of California and the Fire Prevention Division. 8. Updates to Accessory Dwelling Unit Language. The proposed change removes antiquated "Secondary Dwelling Unit" language from the Municipal Code. The changes also further clarify the components of a kitchen. 9. Updates to artificial/synthetic turf. The proposed changes re -affirm that artificial/synthetic turf is not a plant. The changes further clarify that artificial/synthetic turf is permitted for bona fide recreational facilities and single-family homes. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in The Press -Enterprise on November 18, 2021. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Ordinance No. 2021- is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, changes required by state law or revisions that reflect the City's standard practice and patterns, and clarifications or typographical corrections, which do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines if the ordinance is adopted. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 2. Exhibit A — Draft City Council Ordinance 3. Notice of Public Hearing PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 15 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) COMPLY WITH STATE LAW CHANGES TO LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES, (2) CLARIFY THE STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO SENIOR HOUSING, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING, SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, SELF - STORAGE OR MINI -WAREHOUSE FACILITIES AND TO PROJECTS USING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, (3) ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT A SUBDIVISION, (4) UPDATE HOW DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CAN BE USED, (5) CLARIFY WHERE ARTIFICIAL TURF CAN BE INSTALLED, AND (6) MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 17 (Zoning) and Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) and Title 15 (Building and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code on December 1, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. C. The proposed amendments to Title 17 are consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, and each element thereof. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A". E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: The Planning Commission, in recommending adoption of the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the general plan. The proposed amendments to Title 15 & Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be treated as any other residential use would be treated. The proposed revisions to transitional and supportive housing clarify the standards that apply to these uses and are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. All other proposed amendments are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are consistent with Goal 5 of the Growth Management/Public Facilities element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to ensure "Public and quasi -public facilities and services that provide for the social, cultural, civic, and religious, and recreational needs of the community." As a quasi -public facility, day care homes provide needed services to residents who may require day care services. For transitional, supportive, and emergency shelter facilities, Housing Element Policy 2.4 of the General Plan states, "Pursue all available forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development and implementation of the City's housing programs." The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." The remaining proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not result in a contrary policy direction, or indicate an inconsistency between the Temecula Municipal Code and the adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be as treated as any other residential use would be treated. Changes to transitional and supportive housing are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program 43 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." All other proposed amendments are clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Ordinance No. 2021- is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, changes required by state law or revisions that reflect the City's standard practice and patterns, and clarifications or typographical corrections, which do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council of the City of Temecula adopt a Notice of Exemption for the proposed ordinance. Section 4. Recommendation. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council approve Planning Application No. LR20-1223, a proposed Citywide Ordinance as set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 1 st day of December 2021. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of December, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary ORDINANCE NO.2021- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 15 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) COMPLY WITH STATE LAW CHANGES TO LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES, (2) CLARIFY THE STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO SENIOR HOUSING, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING, SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, SELF -STORAGE OR MINI - WAREHOUSE FACILITIES AND TO PROJECTS USING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, (3) ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT A SUBDIVISION, (4) UPDATE HOW DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CAN BE USED, (5) CLARIFY WHERE ARTIFICIAL TURF CAN BE INSTALLED, AND (6) MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make minor revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 15 (Building and Construction), and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code. B. The code amendments are being made to address changes in State law where the City is now preempted from regulating large day care homes. In addition, this Ordinance amends the code to address and reflect the City's standard pattern and practice with respect to (1) improvements for developments without subdivisions (2) use of development impact fees, (3) the standards that apply to senior housing, transitional housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, trash enclosures, and self -storage or mini -warehouse facilities, and (4) the standards that apply to projects in the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The code amendment also reaffirms when artificial turf can be installed and amends the definition of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. Finally, the code amendment makes minor typographical edits to the code. C. As required by State law, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Ordinance") on December 1, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2021-, recommending that the City Council approve the code amendments. E. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on , 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. F. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the general plan. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be treated as any other residential use would be treated. The proposed revisions to transitional and supportive housing clarify the standards that apply to these uses and are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. All other proposed amendments are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are consistent with Goal 5 of the Growth Management/Public Facilities element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to ensure "Public and quasi -public facilities and services that provide for the social, cultural, civic, and religious, and recreational needs of the community." As a quasi -public facility, day care homes provide needed services to residents who may require day care services. For transitional, supportive, and emergency shelter facilities, Housing Element Policy 2.4 of the General Plan states, "Pursue all available forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development and implementation of the City's housing programs." The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." The remaining proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code are minor 2 clarifications and typographical edits and do not result in a contrary policy direction, or indicate an inconsistency between the Temecula Municipal Code and the adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be as treated as any other residential use would be treated. Changes to transitional and supportive housing are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." All other proposed amendments are clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Municipal Code amendments would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, changes required by state law or revisions that reflect the City's standard practice and patterns, and clarifications or typographical corrections, which do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Table 17.03.010 (Planning and Zoning Approval Authority) of Section 17.03.010 (Purpose and intent) of Chapter 17.03 (Administration of Zoning) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.03.010 remaining unchanged: Table 17.03.010 Planning and Zoning Approval Authority Application Administrative Planning Planning City Approval Director Commission Council General plan amendment Recommendation) X1 Zoning amendment: text 1 Recommendation X1 changes Zoning amendment: map Recommendation) X1 changes 3 Zoning amendment: specific plan, includes specific plan amendments Recommendation' X1 Conditional use permit— existing building 1 2 X Conditional use permit with a development plan 1 2 3 X ° ° 1 3 X Development plan (10,000 sq. ft. or greater) X i Development plan (less than 10,000 sq. ft.) X1 Major modifications X2°4 X IA Minor modifications X2 Administrative development plan X2 Home occupation plan X2 day heffie X - - �family eaf:e y Minor exceptions X2 Sign permits X2 Sign programs, including sign program modifications X2 Temporary use permits X2 Variance X1 Seeendafy ' Accessory Dwelling Unit Xs Hillside development permit X1 Section 5. Table 17.06.030 (Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.030 (Use regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.06.030 remaining unchanged: Table 17.06.030 Residential Districts Description of Use I HR I RR I VL I L- I L- I LM I M H HR-SMy 1 2 11 Residential Single-family detached P P P P P P P - P Duplex (two-family dwellings) - - - -2 -2 -2 P P - Single-family attached (greater than P P P two units) Multiple -family - - - - - - P P - Manufactured homes P P P P P P P P P Mobilehome park - - C8 C C C C C - Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or dependent or neglected P P P P P P P P P children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or dependent or neglected C C C C C C P P C children (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or P P P P P P P P P treatment facility (six or fewer) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or C C C8 C C C P P C treatment facility (seven or more) Description of Use (residential HR RR VL L L LM M H HR-SM9 continued) 1 2 Residential care facilities for the P P P p P P P P P elderly (six or fewer) Residential care facilities for the C C C C C C P P C elderly (seven or more) Residential care facilities (six or P P P P P P P P P fewer) Residential care facilities (seven or C C C C C C C P C more) Congregate care residential facilities _ P P p p for the elderly Rooming and boarding house - - - - - - C C - Accessory dwelling units P P P P P P P P P Guest house P P P P P P P4 P4 P Family day care homes —small and P P P P P P P P P large Day care centers C C C C C C C C C Bed and breakfast establishments C C C C C C C C C Emergency shelters C C C8 C C C P P C Transitional housing i G P — G P Es P C P C P EP — P P EP — Supportive housing'2 EP G P C- P C P C P EP P P EP Efficiency units - - - - - - P P - Nonresidential Agriculture/open space uses6 P P P P P P P P C Religious institutions C C C C C C C C C Public utility facilities C C C C C C C C C Educational institutions C C C C C C C C C Libraries C C C, C C C C C - Commercial marijuana activity - - - - - - - - - Marijuana cultivation10 - - - - - - - - - Medical marijuana dispensaries - - - - - - - - - Museums and art galleries (not for profit) C C C8 C C C C C - Kennels and catteries6 C C C - - - - - - Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats P P P P P - - - P Temporary real estate tract offices P P P P P P P P P Recreational vehicle storage yard - C C8 C C C C C - Parking for commercial uses - - - - - - P P - Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls - - - - - - P P - Convalescent facilities - - - - - - P P - Golf courses C C C8 C C C C C - Home occupations P P P P P P P P P Construction trailers',6 P P P P P P P P P Short-term rentals - - - - - - - - - Notes: 12. Transitional housingand nd supportive housing shall be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Section 6. Table 17.06.050A (Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L- 1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning District) of Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.06.050A remaining unchanged: Table 17.06.050A Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L-1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts Accessory Structure Carports Detached guest house Garage Storage/utility enclosure Swimming pool Swimming pool equipment Spa Antennas Gazebo/garden structure Solar collector (ground mounted) Decks not too ee gre (not to exceed 36 inches above the round Front Yard Not permitted Not permitted in the actual front yard' 20 ft. (Entrance faces street) 10 ft. (Entrance from side not facing front yard) Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted in front yard Not permitted Rear Yard 5 ft. min. for support columns Refer to the rear yard setbacks in Table 17.06.040 5 ft. min., but no less than 15 ft. from centerline of alley 3 ft. 5 ft. to water's edge 3 ft. 3 ft. to water's edge 5 ft. 5 ft. 1n 44 n;,-. 5 ft. min. Interior Side Yardl 5 ft. min. for support columns Refer to the side yard setbacks in Table 17.06.040 5 ft. min. 3 ft. 5 ft. to water's edge 3 ft. 3 ft. to water's edge 5 ft. 5 ft. if interior side yard 10 ft. if street side yard on corner lot 1n4 n;r 5 ft. min. Must meet district development standards (i.e. setbacks, height, coverage, etc.) VA Table 17.06.050A Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L-1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts Accessory Structure Front Yard Rear Yard Interior Side Yardl Patio covers 15 ft. 5 ft. min. 5 ft. min. measured at vertical supports Section 7. Subsection "I" (Family Day Care Home Facilities) of Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Zoning Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety, with all other provisions of Section 17.06.050 remaining unchanged. Section 8. Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to change any reference to the terms "Alcoholism and/or drug treatment facility" or "Alcoholism or drug treatment facility" to "Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility". Section 9. Subsection "M" of Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplement Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text) with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "M. Senior Housing/Congregate Care Facilities. Senior housing and congregate care facilities are permitted in the zoning districts identified in the land use tables, subject to the approval of a development plan. Senior housing and congregate care facilities shall comply with the following: 1. Senior housing shall comply with all the provisions of the development code, unless modified by the following provisions: a. The maximum densities for senior housing are as follows: i. In the high density residential zoning district and the community commercial, highway tourism, service commercial, public/institutional district, and professional office zoning districts, the maximum density shall be thirty units per acre. ii. In the medium density residential zoning district and the neighborhood commercial zoning district, the maximum density shall be twenty units per acre. iii. In the low medium residential zoning district, the maximum density shall be eight units per acre. b. The net livable area for each dwelling unit shall not be less than four hundred square feet for an efficiency unit, five hundred fifty square feet for a one -bedroom unit, and seven hundred square feet for a two -bedroom unit. Kitchenettes may be permitted, provided they are sized to meet the immediate needs of the occupants of the unit. c. Senior housing shall comply with the requirements for senior housing developments set forth in Civil Code Section 51.3 et seq. 2. Congregate care projects shall comply with all the provisions of the development code unless modified by the following provisions: a. The maximum densities for congregate care facilities are not limited specifically to density requirements so long as all the site development standards are met (i.e., required setbacks, parking, landscaping, open space, etc.). b. The disabled units shall comply with the standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The provisions of this subsection shall apply to all approved specific plans within the city of Temecula, unless the specific plan contains specific standards for the type of housing being considered." Section 10. Subsection "N" of Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "N. Self -Storage or Mini -Warehouse Facilities. 1. Development Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new self - storage or mini -warehouse facilities: a. The design of the facility shall be compatible with the surrounding area in terms of design, bulk and mass, materials and colors. Building exteriors shall not be corrugated metal or similar surface, but shall be of finished quality. Metal containers are prohibited; b. In commercial zoning districts the rear and side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten feet. In industrial zoning districts no rear or side yard setbacks are required. The director of planning may increase the setbacks to a maximum of twenty-five feet when adjacent to an existing residential development project. The front yard setback shall maintain the setback for the underlying zoning classification; c. The maximum lot coverage and floor area ratio (FAR) shall be sixty-five percent; d. The development site shall provide a minimum of ten percent landscaped open space for a project within commercial districts. In industrial districts, the total landscaping shall be equal to the required setback areas. No interior landscaping is required, but the setback areas shall be landscaped; e. A manager's residential unit may be provided, but is not required; f. Required parking spaces may not be rented as, or used for, vehicular storage. However, additional parking area may be provided for vehicles, boats, buses, trailers, etc., provided that the storage area is adequately screened from public E view with enhanced landscaping, decorative walls, fences, or other methods as deemed appropriate by the director. 2. Performance and Use Regulations. a. Any business activity, other than rental of storage units, including the on -site sale of merchandise or garage sales, and transfer/storage businesses which utilize vehicles as part of the business is prohibited. No servicing or repair of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers, or any similar equipment is permitted. b. Storage units shall not be used for the storage of flammable liquids, highly combustible or explosive materials, or hazardous chemicals. c. Truck or vehicle rental is prohibited without obtaining all necessary approvals subject to the development code schedule of permitted uses." Section 11. A new Subsection "R" is hereby added to Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "R. Emergency Shelters. Emergency shelters shall be allowed in accordance with the land use table for the specific zone and provided that the following development standards are met: 1. The minimum floor area per occupant shall beat least one hundred fifty (150) square feet and the maximum number of occupants to be served at any given time shall not exceed fifty (50). 2. A minimum distance of three hundred feet (300') shall be maintained from any other emergency shelter. 3. The maximum stay per occupant at the facility shall not exceed ninety (90) days in a three hundred sixty five (365) day period. 4. On site client waiting and intake areas shall be located inside the building and shall be screened from public and private property where feasible. If not feasible, an exterior waiting area shall be provided that (a) contains a minimum of ten (10) square feet per bed provided at the facility; (b) is in a location not adjacent to the public right of way; and (c) is visibly separated from public view by a minimum six foot (6) tall visual screening. 5. A minimum of one employee per fifteen (15) beds shall be on duty and remain on site during operational hours whenever clients are on the site. Licensed security personnel shall also be provided during operational hours whenever clients are on the site and when people are waiting outside the facility. The licensed security personnel shall be in addition to the minimum employee requirement set forth above. 6. Exterior lighting shall be provided for the entire outdoor area of the site, and shall be stationary, shielded, and directed away from adjacent properties and public rights of way. Lighting should be provided at a minimum illumination of one footcandle across parking areas and two footcandles at entrances. 7. A minimum of one parking space for every ten (10) beds, plus one-half (1/2) parking space for each bedroom designated for families with children, plus one parking space for each 10 employee/volunteer on duty, shall be maintained. The number of parking spaces may be reduced by twenty-five percent (25%) if the shelter is located within one thousand feet (1,000') of a public transit stop. Bicycle rack parking shall also be provided at the facility. 8. The facility may provide the following services and facilities to clients in a designated area separate from the sleeping areas: a. A recreation area either inside or outside the shelter. If located outside, the area shall be screened from public view with landscaping. b. A counseling center for job placement, educational, healthcare, legal, or mental health services. c. Laundry facilities to serve the occupants at the shelter. d. A kitchen for the preparation of meals. e. A dining hall. f. Client storage areas (i.e., for the overnight storage of bicycles and personal items). 9. The operator of the facility shall provide, at the city's request, an annual report of the use of the facility and determination of compliance with the city's development standards for the use. 10. A management plan shall be submitted to be reviewed, approved, and enforced by the director of community development. The management plan shall be approved before issuance of a building permit (including those building permits solely utilized for occupancy only). The management plan shall be comprehensive and shall address, at a minimum, hours of operation, eligibility requirements, admission hours and process, staff training, case management, neighborhood outreach and privacy, resident counseling and treatment, maintenance plans, residency and guest rules and procedures including rules pertaining to drugs, alcohol, tobacco, weapons and fraternization, staffing and volunteer needs, including job descriptions, procedures related to families with children, policies related to personal effects, disciplinary procedures, safety policy, grievance procedures, and emergency preparedness plan." Section 12. A new Subsection "S" is hereby added to Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "S. Trash Enclosures Trash enclosures shall be designed in a manner that incorporates the following requirements: 1. Trash enclosures shall be designed in a size, manner, and location that is approved by the City's trash purveyor and the City. 2. Trash enclosures shall be designed in accordance with the City's most recent design standards. 3. Trash enclosures shall incorporate architectural design features from the surrounding architecture, including finishes, roofing, and colors. 4. Trash enclosures shall incorporate a solid (non -permeable) roof and working interior illumination (a minimum of one foot candle throughout the interior). 11 5. Trash enclosures shall have working locking mechanisms on all access gates, including pedestrian access gates, that shall remain locked and accessible only to authorized users (residents, commercial tenants, etc.) during times when pick-up service is not scheduled. 6. Trash enclosures shall have anti -dumping design features incorporated into the design of the trash enclosure, which prevent (a) the transfer of materials over or around the trash enclosure, and (b) the unauthorized entry into any portion of the trash enclosure or unauthorized dumping. Anti -dumping features must be designed in complimentary design manner to the existing or proposed building, and shall not include chain link fence, razor wire, or barbed wire. 7. When required by the Public Works Department, the trash enclosures shall have a drain that is tied into the sewer purveyor and designed to the sewer purveyor's standards. 8. When required by the Public Works Department, trash enclosures shall have a functioning hose bib located within the interior of the trash enclosure to keep the trash enclosure free of potential pollutants. The hose bib shall have a detachable key and/or locking mechanism. The hose bib shall be designed in a manner where the hose bib is protected from damage occurring from normal operations by location or another physical barrier. 9. Upgrades to existing trash enclosures may be required as determined by the Public Works Director, based upon the scope of tenant improvements to an existing building, building additions or other similar modifications. Tenant improvements at restaurants, automobile repair facilities, and other uses with a higher likelihood of pollutants will require upgrades to the existing trash enclosures." Architectural Roof s - ` Durable Doors with Locking - Anti -dumping r� Mechanism l��ls. r Features Matching Building Finishes(Stucco, Brick, Etc.) SAWLE TRASH ENCLOSURE Section 13. Note 4 of Table 17.12.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses— Public/Institutional Districts.) of Section 17.12.030 (Use Regulations) of Chapter 17.12 (Public/Institutional District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby 12 amended to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.12.030 remaining unchanged: "4. Residential, multiple -family housing shall be allowed in the PI zone only if W the affordable housing overlay (AHO) applies to the property, (2) the proposed development complies with all of the requirements of the High Density Residential District Standards outlined in Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards — Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.040 (Development Standards) and (33,) the proposed development complies with all requirements of Chapter 17.21." Section 14. Table 17.12.040 (Development Standards — Public Institutional Districts) of Section 17.12.040 (Development Standards) of Chapter 17.12 (Public/Institutional District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new note 1 to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text): GG Table 17.12.040 Development Standards—Public/Institutional Districts Development Standard' PI District Minimum lot size 7,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot width 50 ft. Minimum lot depth 100 ft. Maximum lot coverage 35% Floor area ratio 0.3 Setbacks': Front yard 20 ft. Interior side yard 5 ft. Street side yard 15 ft. Rear yard 15 ft. Rear yard —adjacent to alley or street 20 ft. Minimum landscape coverages 25% Note: 1. Residential. multiple-familv housing utilizing the affordable housing overlav (AHO) shall comply with all of the requirements of the High Density Residential District Standards outlined in Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards — Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.040 (Development Standards) and the development shall comply with all reauirements of Chapter 17.21." Section 15. Table 17.22.116 (Schedule of Permitted Uses Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay District-2) of Section 17.22.116 (Use regulations.) of Chapter 17.21 (Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO-)) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and 13 additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.22.116 remaining unchanged: Table 17.22.116 Schedule of Permitted Uses Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay District-2 Description of Use PDO-2 Residential Single-family detached P1 Duplex (two-family dwellings) P1 Single-family attached (greater than two units) P Multiple -family P Manufactured homes P Mobilehome park - Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled or dependent or neglected children (six or fewer) P Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled or dependent or neglected children (seven to twelve) P Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or fewer) P Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility seven or more P Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or more) P Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly P Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities C Secondary dwelling units - Guest house P3 Family day care homes —small and large P Family y ea,.o hefne& 4arge R Day care centers C Bed and breakfast establishments Emergency shelters P Transitional housing P Nonresidential Agriculture/open space uses P Religious institutions - Public utility facilities - Educational institutions - Public libraries C Public museums and art galleries (not forprofit) - Kennels and catteries - Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats - Temporary real estate tract offices P Recreational vehicle storage yard CZ 14 Parking for commercial uses I- Section 16. Section 17.23.020 (Definitions) of Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text) with all other provisions of Section 17.23.020 remaining unchanged: "Accessory dwelling unit" or "ADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code section 65852.2, as the same may be amended from time to time. An Accessory dwelling unit contains a kitchen, which may include plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and/or physical space set aside for cooking or meal preparation facilities, which may include space for a refrigerator, sink, wet bar. and/or dishwasher. "Attached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a physical expansion (i.e. addition) of the primary dwelling and shares a common wall with the primary dwelling. "Detached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a separate structure from the primary dwelling, which does not share any walls with the primary dwelling. "Existing structure" means an existing single-family dwelling or other accessory structure that can be safely converted into habitable space under the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the city, and other applicable law. "Junior accessory dwelling unit" or "JADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 65852.22, as the same may be amended from time to time. A junior accessory dwelling unit contains at least an efficiency kitchen, which may include plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and/or physical space set aside for cooking or meal preparation facilities, which may include space for a refrigerator, sink, wet bar, and/or dishwasher. "Primary dwelling", for purposes of this chapter, means the existing or proposed single- family dwelling on the lot where an ADU would be located. "Public transit", for purposes of this chapter, has the meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 65852.20), as the same may be amended from time to time. Section 17. Subsection "K" of Section 17.32.060 (Landscape Design Requirements.) of Chapter 17.32 (Water Efficient Landscape Design) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new number "9" to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.32.060 remaining unchanged: "9. Artificial/synthetic turf is not a permitted plant material in commercial, industrial, or mixed -use zones and/or multi -family projects. Artificial turf may be permitted in commercial, industrial, and/or mixed -use zones or multi -family projects when utilized for bona fide recreational facilities such as a sports field. Artificial/synthetic turf is a permitted non -plant material for single family homes when used in place of a lawn or other landscaped area of the home." 15 Section 18. The Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 15.07 (Dedications and Improvements Where No Subdivision is Involved) to Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) which shall read as follows: "Chapter 15.07 Dedications and Improvements Where No Subdivision is Involved 15.07.010 Purpose. 15.07.020 Dedications required. 15.07.030 Design of public improvements and security. 15.07.040 Deferrals of Public Improvement Requirements. 15.07.050 Exemption for Expansion of Existing Single Family Homes. 15.07.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards and requirements for dedications and improvements in connection with the development of land in which no subdivision is involved. 15.07.020 Dedications required. A. Applicants who propose new development within the city shall provide, by means of an offer of dedication or other appropriate conveyance as approved by the city attorney, the rights -of -way necessary for the construction of any street, trail, and/or bicycle path as shown on the circulation plan in the general plan or any supplemental document identified in the general plan, any applicable specific plan, or as otherwise required by the city engineer in connection with a land use entitlement pursuant to Title 17. Rights -of -way shall also be provided for improvements to existing facilities including rights -of -way for storm drains, trails, bicycle paths, or other required public facilities. All rights -of -way shall be accompanied by a title examination report and be free of all liens and encumbrances. Dedications required by this section shall be made before the issuance of a building permit for a subject property. 15.07.030 Design of public improvements and security. A. Public Improvements. Applicants shall construct public improvements to city standards and shall comply with the requirements set forth in Section 16.30.080, with the following modifications: 1. Any reference to "tentative map" or "final or parcel map" is replaced with "land use entitlement"; and 2. Any reference to "subdivider" is replaced with "applicant". B. Security. Applicants are required to guarantee the construction of public improvements by executing an improvement agreement secured by a bond or cash deposit before issuance of a building permit for the subject property. If the building permit is not exercised, the improvement obligation shall terminate and the security shall be returned. The city engineer is authorized to execute agreements on behalf of the city. The improvement agreement and security shall comply with the requirements set forth in Section 16.30.100 (A) through (E) with the following modifications: 16 1. Any reference to "subdivision improvement agreement" is replaced with "improvement agreement"; 2. Any reference to "subdivider" is replaced with "applicant"; 3. The reference in Section 16.30.100(B) to agreements being executed by "those parties executing the final or parcel map" shall be replaced with "the applicant"; and 4. The reference in Section 16.30.100(C) to "final tract map, parcel map waiver, lot line adjustment, or lot merger" is replaced with "land use entitlement". 15.07.040 Deferrals of Public Improvement Requirements. Any required frontage improvements may be deferred when deemed appropriate by the city engineer. Deferral shall be allowed only when the city engineer finds that construction is impractical due to physical constraints. When improvements are deferred, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city for the installation of all frontage improvements at a future date as determined by the city engineer. The agreement shall be approved by the city attorney. The agreement shall provide for the following: A. Construction of required improvements shall begin within ninety (90) days of the receipt of notice to proceed from the city engineer; B. In the event of default by the applicant or successors, the city is authorized to cause the construction to be done and charge the entire cost and expense to the applicant or successors, including interest from the date of notice of the cost and expense until paid; C. The agreement shall be recorded with the county recorder, at the expense of the applicant, and shall constitute: 1. Notice to all successors of title to the real property of the obligation; and 2. A lien in an amount to fully reimburse the city for the cost of constructing the improvements, including interest as outlined above, subject to foreclosure in the event of default in payment. D. In the event of litigation caused by a default of the applicant or successors, the applicant or successors agree to pay all costs involved, including reasonable attorney's fees, which shall become a part of the lien against the real property; E. The term "applicant" shall include not only the present owner but also heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns, with the intent that the obligations undertaken shall run with the real property and constitute a lien against it: and F. Other provisions deemed necessary by the city engineer. 15.07.050 Exemption for Expansion of Existing Single Family Homes. A. The following developments shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter to construct street improvements: 1. The addition, enlargement, expansion, alteration, extension, reconstruction or replacement of any existing single family dwelling and/or accessory structure up to a maximum increase in square footage of 25% to the existing dwelling or structure 17 2. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit up to 1,200 square feet in size. 3. The development of non -habitable accessory structure(s) as provided for under Section 17.06.050 of this Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts). B. A development that is exempt from the requirement to construct street improvements as provided for in this section shall remain subject to the requirement to provide the city with an irrevocable offer of dedication for the ultimate street right-of-way for any addition, enlargement, expansion, alteration, extension, reconstruction or replacement of an existing single family dwelling and/or habitable accessory structure regardless of size. C. No exemption from the requirement to construct street improvements shall be granted if the city engineer determines that the lack of street improvements in this case would be a potential danger to the public health, safety, and welfare." Section 19. Section 15.06.060 (Use of Funds.) of Chapter 15.06 (Public Facilities Development Impact Fee) of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby renamed "Accounting and Use of Development Impact Fees, and amended in its entirety to read as follows: "The City shall establish separate accounts for each category of development impact fee established by the City Council and deposit development impact fees collected into the appropriate account. The money deposited into these accounts, and any interest earnings thereon, shall be used solely for the public improvements, public services, and community amenities for which the development impact fees were imposed. Development impact fees may be used to pay the principal, interest and other costs of bonds, notes and other obligations issued or undertaken by or on behalf of the City to finance such improvements, services and amenities." Section 20. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. Section 21. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 22. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula the _day of , 2021. a Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2021- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2021, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 19 Randi Johl City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula ,. PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: 1989 CASE NO: LR20-1223 APPLICANT: City of Temecula PROPOSAL: A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommending that the City Council of the City of Temecula adopt an ordinance entitled, "An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending Titles 15 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to (1) comply with state law changes to large family day care homes, (2) clarify the standards that apply to senior housing, transitional housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, trash enclosures, self -storage or mini -warehouse facilities and to projects using the affordable housing overlay zone, (3) establish standards and requirements for dedications and improvements for developments without a subdivision, (4) update how development impact fees can be used, (5) clarify where artificial turf can be installed, and (6) make minor typographical edits and finding that this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15061 (b)(3)" ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA Section 150619 (b)(3) CASE PLANNER: Brandon Rabidou, (951) 506-5142 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: December 1, 2021 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. C:\USERS\LEGISTARV PPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECH NOLOGIES\EASVPDF 8\@BCL@D40F57F4\@BCL@D4OF57F4.DOCX PC RESOLUTION NO.2021-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 15 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) COMPLY WITH STATE LAW CHANGES TO LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES, (2) CLARIFY THE STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO SENIOR HOUSING, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING, SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, SELF - STORAGE OR MINI -WAREHOUSE FACILITIES AND TO PROJECTS USING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, (3) ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT A SUBDIVISION, (4) UPDATE HOW DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CAN BE USED, (5) CLARIFY WHERE ARTIFICIAL TURF CAN BE INSTALLED, AND (6) MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 17 (Zoning) and Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) and Title 15 (Building and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code on December 1, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. C. The proposed amendments to Title 17 are consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, and each element thereof. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A". E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: The Planning Commission, in recommending adoption of the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the general plan. The proposed amendments to Title 15 & Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be treated as any other residential use would be treated. The proposed revisions to transitional and supportive housing clarify the standards that apply to these uses and are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. All other proposed amendments are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are consistent with Goal 5 of the Growth Management/Public Facilities element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to ensure "Public and quasi -public facilities and services that provide for the social, cultural, civic, and religious, and recreational needs of the community." As a quasi -public facility, day care homes provide needed services to residents who may require day care services. For transitional, supportive, and emergency shelter facilities, Housing Element Policy 2.4 of the General Plan states, "Pursue all available forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development and implementation of the City's housing programs." The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." The remaining proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not result in a contrary policy direction, or indicate an inconsistency between the Temecula Municipal Code and the adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be as treated as any other residential use would be treated. Changes to transitional and supportive housing are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." All other proposed amendments are clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Ordinance No. 2021- is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, changes required by state law or revisions that reflect the City's standard practice and patterns, and clarifications or typographical corrections, which do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council of the City of Temecula adopt a Notice of Exemption for the proposed ordinance. Section 4. Recommendation. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council approve Planning Application No. LR20-1223, a proposed Citywide Ordinance as set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 1 st day of December 2021. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTEST: uke a son Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2021-41 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of December, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Turley-Trejo, Watts C ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Ruiz, Tele uke Watson Secretary ORDINANCE NO.2021- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 15 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) COMPLY WITH STATE LAW CHANGES TO LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES, (2) CLARIFY THE STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO SENIOR HOUSING, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING, SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, SELF -STORAGE OR MINI - WAREHOUSE FACILITIES AND TO PROJECTS USING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, (3) ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT A SUBDIVISION, (4) UPDATE HOW DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CAN BE USED, (5) CLARIFY WHERE ARTIFICIAL TURF CAN BE INSTALLED, AND (6) MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make minor revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 15 (Building and Construction), and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code. B. The code amendments are being made to address changes in State law where the City is now preempted from regulating large day care homes. In addition, this Ordinance amends the code to address and reflect the City's standard pattern and practice with respect to (1) improvements for developments without subdivisions (2) use of development impact fees, (3) the standards that apply to senior housing, transitional housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, trash enclosures, and self -storage or mini -warehouse facilities, and (4) the standards that apply to projects in the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The code amendment also reaffirms when artificial turf can be installed and amends the definition of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. Finally, the code amendment makes minor typographical edits to the code. C. As required by State law, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Ordinance") on December 1, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2021-, recommending that the City Council approve the code amendments. E. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on , 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. F. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the general plan. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be treated as any other residential use would be treated. The proposed revisions to transitional and supportive housing clarify the standards that apply to these uses and are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. All other proposed amendments are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are consistent with Goal 5 of the Growth Management/Public Facilities element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to ensure "Public and quasi -public facilities and services that provide for the social, cultural, civic, and religious, and recreational needs of the community." As a quasi -public facility, day care homes provide needed services to residents who may require day care services. For transitional, supportive, and emergency shelter facilities, Housing Element Policy 2.4 of the General Plan states, "Pursue all available forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development and implementation of the City's housing programs." The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." The remaining proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code are minor 2 clarifications and typographical edits and do not result in a contrary policy direction, or indicate an inconsistency between the Temecula Municipal Code and the adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed changes to family day care homes are required by recent state legislation that requires all day care facilities to be as treated as any other residential use would be treated. Changes to transitional and supportive housing are required to adhere to state law in compliance with Housing Program #3 of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Standards for emergency shelters are in Compliance with Housing Program #2 of the Housing Element. The proposed changes related to senior housing are supported by Housing Element Policy 5.3 of the General Plan that states, "Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly..." All other proposed amendments are clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Municipal Code amendments would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, changes required by state law or revisions that reflect the City's standard practice and patterns, and clarifications or typographical corrections, which do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Table 17.03.010 (Planning and Zoning Approval Authority) of Section 17.03.010 (Purpose and intent) of Chapter 17.03 (Administration of Zoning) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.03.010 remaining unchanged: Table 17.03.010 Planning and Zoning Approval Authority Application Administrative Planning Planning City Approval Director Commission Council General plan amendment Recommendation) X1 Zoning amendment: text 1 Recommendation X1 changes Zoning amendment: map Recommendation) X1 changes 3 Zoning amendment: specific plan, includes specific plan amendments Recommendation' X1 Conditional use permit— existing building 1 2 X Conditional use permit with a development plan 1 2 3 X ° ° 1 3 X Development plan (10,000 sq. ft. or greater) X i Development plan (less than 10,000 sq. ft.) X1 Major modifications X2°4 X IA Minor modifications X2 Administrative development plan X2 Home occupation plan X2 day heffie X - - �family eaf:e y Minor exceptions X2 Sign permits X2 Sign programs, including sign program modifications X2 Temporary use permits X2 Variance X1 Seeendafy ' Accessory Dwelling Unit Xs Hillside development permit X1 Section 5. Table 17.06.030 (Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.030 (Use regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.06.030 remaining unchanged: Table 17.06.030 Residential Districts Description of Use I HR I RR I VL I L- I L- I LM I M H HR-SMy 1 2 11 Residential Single-family detached P P P P P P P - P Duplex (two-family dwellings) - - - -2 -2 -2 P P - Single-family attached (greater than P P P two units) Multiple -family - - - - - - P P - Manufactured homes P P P P P P P P P Mobilehome park - - C8 C C C C C - Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or dependent or neglected P P P P P P P P P children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or dependent or neglected C C C C C C P P C children (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or P P P P P P P P P treatment facility (six or fewer) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or C C C8 C C C P P C treatment facility (seven or more) Description of Use (residential HR RR VL L L LM M H HR-SM9 continued) 1 2 Residential care facilities for the P P P p P P P P P elderly (six or fewer) Residential care facilities for the C C C C C C P P C elderly (seven or more) Residential care facilities (six or P P P P P P P P P fewer) Residential care facilities (seven or C C C C C C C P C more) Congregate care residential facilities _ P P p p for the elderly Rooming and boarding house - - - - - - C C - Accessory dwelling units P P P P P P P P P Guest house P P P P P P P4 P4 P Family day care homes —small and P P P P P P P P P large Day care centers C C C C C C C C C Bed and breakfast establishments C C C C C C C C C Emergency shelters C C C8 C C C P P C Transitional housing i G P — G P Es P C P C P EP — P P EP — Supportive housing'2 EP G P C- P C P C P EP P P EP Efficiency units - - - - - - P P - Nonresidential Agriculture/open space uses6 P P P P P P P P C Religious institutions C C C C C C C C C Public utility facilities C C C C C C C C C Educational institutions C C C C C C C C C Libraries C C C, C C C C C - Commercial marijuana activity - - - - - - - - - Marijuana cultivation10 - - - - - - - - - Medical marijuana dispensaries - - - - - - - - - Museums and art galleries (not for profit) C C C8 C C C C C - Kennels and catteries6 C C C - - - - - - Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats P P P P P - - - P Temporary real estate tract offices P P P P P P P P P Recreational vehicle storage yard - C C8 C C C C C - Parking for commercial uses - - - - - - P P - Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls - - - - - - P P - Convalescent facilities - - - - - - P P - Golf courses C C C8 C C C C C - Home occupations P P P P P P P P P Construction trailers',6 P P P P P P P P P Short-term rentals - - - - - - - - - Notes: 12. Transitional housingand nd supportive housing shall be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Section 6. Table 17.06.050A (Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L- 1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning District) of Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.06.050A remaining unchanged: Table 17.06.050A Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L-1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts Accessory Structure Carports Detached guest house Garage Storage/utility enclosure Swimming pool Swimming pool equipment Spa Antennas Gazebo/garden structure Solar collector (ground mounted) Decks not too ee gre (not to exceed 36 inches above the round Front Yard Not permitted Not permitted in the actual front yard' 20 ft. (Entrance faces street) 10 ft. (Entrance from side not facing front yard) Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted in front yard Not permitted Rear Yard 5 ft. min. for support columns Refer to the rear yard setbacks in Table 17.06.040 5 ft. min., but no less than 15 ft. from centerline of alley 3 ft. 5 ft. to water's edge 3 ft. 3 ft. to water's edge 5 ft. 5 ft. 1n 44 n;,-. 5 ft. min. Interior Side Yardl 5 ft. min. for support columns Refer to the side yard setbacks in Table 17.06.040 5 ft. min. 3 ft. 5 ft. to water's edge 3 ft. 3 ft. to water's edge 5 ft. 5 ft. if interior side yard 10 ft. if street side yard on corner lot 1n4 n;r 5 ft. min. Must meet district development standards (i.e. setbacks, height, coverage, etc.) VA Table 17.06.050A Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L-1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts Accessory Structure Front Yard Rear Yard Interior Side Yardl Patio covers 15 ft. 5 ft. min. 5 ft. min. measured at vertical supports Section 7. Subsection "I" (Family Day Care Home Facilities) of Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Zoning Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety, with all other provisions of Section 17.06.050 remaining unchanged. Section 8. Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to change any reference to the terms "Alcoholism and/or drug treatment facility" or "Alcoholism or drug treatment facility" to "Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility". Section 9. Subsection "M" of Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplement Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text) with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "M. Senior Housing/Congregate Care Facilities. Senior housing and congregate care facilities are permitted in the zoning districts identified in the land use tables, subject to the approval of a development plan. Senior housing and congregate care facilities shall comply with the following: 1. Senior housing shall comply with all the provisions of the development code, unless modified by the following provisions: a. The maximum densities for senior housing are as follows: i. In the high density residential zoning district and the community commercial, highway tourism, service commercial, public/institutional district, and professional office zoning districts, the maximum density shall be thirty units per acre. ii. In the medium density residential zoning district and the neighborhood commercial zoning district, the maximum density shall be twenty units per acre. iii. In the low medium residential zoning district, the maximum density shall be eight units per acre. b. The net livable area for each dwelling unit shall not be less than four hundred square feet for an efficiency unit, five hundred fifty square feet for a one -bedroom unit, and seven hundred square feet for a two -bedroom unit. Kitchenettes may be permitted, provided they are sized to meet the immediate needs of the occupants of the unit. c. Senior housing shall comply with the requirements for senior housing developments set forth in Civil Code Section 51.3 et seq. 2. Congregate care projects shall comply with all the provisions of the development code unless modified by the following provisions: a. The maximum densities for congregate care facilities are not limited specifically to density requirements so long as all the site development standards are met (i.e., required setbacks, parking, landscaping, open space, etc.). b. The disabled units shall comply with the standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The provisions of this subsection shall apply to all approved specific plans within the city of Temecula, unless the specific plan contains specific standards for the type of housing being considered." Section 10. Subsection "N" of Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "N. Self -Storage or Mini -Warehouse Facilities. 1. Development Standards. The following standards shall be applied to all new self - storage or mini -warehouse facilities: a. The design of the facility shall be compatible with the surrounding area in terms of design, bulk and mass, materials and colors. Building exteriors shall not be corrugated metal or similar surface, but shall be of finished quality. Metal containers are prohibited; b. In commercial zoning districts the rear and side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten feet. In industrial zoning districts no rear or side yard setbacks are required. The director of planning may increase the setbacks to a maximum of twenty-five feet when adjacent to an existing residential development project. The front yard setback shall maintain the setback for the underlying zoning classification; c. The maximum lot coverage and floor area ratio (FAR) shall be sixty-five percent; d. The development site shall provide a minimum of ten percent landscaped open space for a project within commercial districts. In industrial districts, the total landscaping shall be equal to the required setback areas. No interior landscaping is required, but the setback areas shall be landscaped; e. A manager's residential unit may be provided, but is not required; f. Required parking spaces may not be rented as, or used for, vehicular storage. However, additional parking area may be provided for vehicles, boats, buses, trailers, etc., provided that the storage area is adequately screened from public E view with enhanced landscaping, decorative walls, fences, or other methods as deemed appropriate by the director. 2. Performance and Use Regulations. a. Any business activity, other than rental of storage units, including the on -site sale of merchandise or garage sales, and transfer/storage businesses which utilize vehicles as part of the business is prohibited. No servicing or repair of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers, or any similar equipment is permitted. b. Storage units shall not be used for the storage of flammable liquids, highly combustible or explosive materials, or hazardous chemicals. c. Truck or vehicle rental is prohibited without obtaining all necessary approvals subject to the development code schedule of permitted uses." Section 11. A new Subsection "R" is hereby added to Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "R. Emergency Shelters. Emergency shelters shall be allowed in accordance with the land use table for the specific zone and provided that the following development standards are met: 1. The minimum floor area per occupant shall beat least one hundred fifty (150) square feet and the maximum number of occupants to be served at any given time shall not exceed fifty (50). 2. A minimum distance of three hundred feet (300') shall be maintained from any other emergency shelter. 3. The maximum stay per occupant at the facility shall not exceed ninety (90) days in a three hundred sixty five (365) day period. 4. On site client waiting and intake areas shall be located inside the building and shall be screened from public and private property where feasible. If not feasible, an exterior waiting area shall be provided that (a) contains a minimum of ten (10) square feet per bed provided at the facility; (b) is in a location not adjacent to the public right of way; and (c) is visibly separated from public view by a minimum six foot (6) tall visual screening. 5. A minimum of one employee per fifteen (15) beds shall be on duty and remain on site during operational hours whenever clients are on the site. Licensed security personnel shall also be provided during operational hours whenever clients are on the site and when people are waiting outside the facility. The licensed security personnel shall be in addition to the minimum employee requirement set forth above. 6. Exterior lighting shall be provided for the entire outdoor area of the site, and shall be stationary, shielded, and directed away from adjacent properties and public rights of way. Lighting should be provided at a minimum illumination of one footcandle across parking areas and two footcandles at entrances. 7. A minimum of one parking space for every ten (10) beds, plus one-half (1/2) parking space for each bedroom designated for families with children, plus one parking space for each 10 employee/volunteer on duty, shall be maintained. The number of parking spaces may be reduced by twenty-five percent (25%) if the shelter is located within one thousand feet (1,000') of a public transit stop. Bicycle rack parking shall also be provided at the facility. 8. The facility may provide the following services and facilities to clients in a designated area separate from the sleeping areas: a. A recreation area either inside or outside the shelter. If located outside, the area shall be screened from public view with landscaping. b. A counseling center for job placement, educational, healthcare, legal, or mental health services. c. Laundry facilities to serve the occupants at the shelter. d. A kitchen for the preparation of meals. e. A dining hall. f. Client storage areas (i.e., for the overnight storage of bicycles and personal items). 9. The operator of the facility shall provide, at the city's request, an annual report of the use of the facility and determination of compliance with the city's development standards for the use. 10. A management plan shall be submitted to be reviewed, approved, and enforced by the director of community development. The management plan shall be approved before issuance of a building permit (including those building permits solely utilized for occupancy only). The management plan shall be comprehensive and shall address, at a minimum, hours of operation, eligibility requirements, admission hours and process, staff training, case management, neighborhood outreach and privacy, resident counseling and treatment, maintenance plans, residency and guest rules and procedures including rules pertaining to drugs, alcohol, tobacco, weapons and fraternization, staffing and volunteer needs, including job descriptions, procedures related to families with children, policies related to personal effects, disciplinary procedures, safety policy, grievance procedures, and emergency preparedness plan." Section 12. A new Subsection "S" is hereby added to Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.10.020 remaining unchanged: "S. Trash Enclosures Trash enclosures shall be designed in a manner that incorporates the following requirements: 1. Trash enclosures shall be designed in a size, manner, and location that is approved by the City's trash purveyor and the City. 2. Trash enclosures shall be designed in accordance with the City's most recent design standards. 3. Trash enclosures shall incorporate architectural design features from the surrounding architecture, including finishes, roofing, and colors. 4. Trash enclosures shall incorporate a solid (non -permeable) roof and working interior illumination (a minimum of one foot candle throughout the interior). 11 5. Trash enclosures shall have working locking mechanisms on all access gates, including pedestrian access gates, that shall remain locked and accessible only to authorized users (residents, commercial tenants, etc.) during times when pick-up service is not scheduled. 6. Trash enclosures shall have anti -dumping design features incorporated into the design of the trash enclosure, which prevent (a) the transfer of materials over or around the trash enclosure, and (b) the unauthorized entry into any portion of the trash enclosure or unauthorized dumping. Anti -dumping features must be designed in complimentary design manner to the existing or proposed building, and shall not include chain link fence, razor wire, or barbed wire. 7. When required by the Public Works Department, the trash enclosures shall have a drain that is tied into the sewer purveyor and designed to the sewer purveyor's standards. 8. When required by the Public Works Department, trash enclosures shall have a functioning hose bib located within the interior of the trash enclosure to keep the trash enclosure free of potential pollutants. The hose bib shall have a detachable key and/or locking mechanism. The hose bib shall be designed in a manner where the hose bib is protected from damage occurring from normal operations by location or another physical barrier. 9. Upgrades to existing trash enclosures may be required as determined by the Public Works Director, based upon the scope of tenant improvements to an existing building, building additions or other similar modifications. Tenant improvements at restaurants, automobile repair facilities, and other uses with a higher likelihood of pollutants will require upgrades to the existing trash enclosures." Architectural Roof s - ` Durable Doors with Locking - Anti -dumping r� Mechanism l��ls. r Features Matching Building Finishes(Stucco, Brick, Etc.) SAWLE TRASH ENCLOSURE Section 13. Note 4 of Table 17.12.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses— Public/Institutional Districts.) of Section 17.12.030 (Use Regulations) of Chapter 17.12 (Public/Institutional District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby 12 amended to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.12.030 remaining unchanged: "4. Residential, multiple -family housing shall be allowed in the PI zone only if W the affordable housing overlay (AHO) applies to the property, (2) the proposed development complies with all of the requirements of the High Density Residential District Standards outlined in Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards — Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.040 (Development Standards) and (33,) the proposed development complies with all requirements of Chapter 17.21." Section 14. Table 17.12.040 (Development Standards — Public Institutional Districts) of Section 17.12.040 (Development Standards) of Chapter 17.12 (Public/Institutional District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new note 1 to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text): GG Table 17.12.040 Development Standards—Public/Institutional Districts Development Standard' PI District Minimum lot size 7,000 sq. ft. Minimum lot width 50 ft. Minimum lot depth 100 ft. Maximum lot coverage 35% Floor area ratio 0.3 Setbacks': Front yard 20 ft. Interior side yard 5 ft. Street side yard 15 ft. Rear yard 15 ft. Rear yard —adjacent to alley or street 20 ft. Minimum landscape coverages 25% Note: 1. Residential. multiple-familv housing utilizing the affordable housing overlav (AHO) shall comply with all of the requirements of the High Density Residential District Standards outlined in Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards — Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.040 (Development Standards) and the development shall comply with all reauirements of Chapter 17.21." Section 15. Table 17.22.116 (Schedule of Permitted Uses Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay District-2) of Section 17.22.116 (Use regulations.) of Chapter 17.21 (Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO-)) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and 13 additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.22.116 remaining unchanged: Table 17.22.116 Schedule of Permitted Uses Margarita Road Planned Development Overlay District-2 Description of Use PDO-2 Residential Single-family detached P1 Duplex (two-family dwellings) P1 Single-family attached (greater than two units) P Multiple -family P Manufactured homes P Mobilehome park - Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled or dependent or neglected children (six or fewer) P Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled or dependent or neglected children (seven to twelve) P Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or fewer) P Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility seven or more P Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or more) P Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly P Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities C Secondary dwelling units - Guest house P3 Family day care homes —small and large P Family y ea,.o hefne& 4arge R Day care centers C Bed and breakfast establishments Emergency shelters P Transitional housing P Nonresidential Agriculture/open space uses P Religious institutions - Public utility facilities - Educational institutions - Public libraries C Public museums and art galleries (not forprofit) - Kennels and catteries - Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats - Temporary real estate tract offices P Recreational vehicle storage yard CZ 14 Parking for commercial uses I- Section 16. Section 17.23.020 (Definitions) of Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text) with all other provisions of Section 17.23.020 remaining unchanged: "Accessory dwelling unit" or "ADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code section 65852.2, as the same may be amended from time to time. An Accessory dwelling unit contains a kitchen, which may include plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and/or physical space set aside for cooking or meal preparation facilities, which may include space for a refrigerator, sink, wet bar. and/or dishwasher. "Attached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a physical expansion (i.e. addition) of the primary dwelling and shares a common wall with the primary dwelling. "Detached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a separate structure from the primary dwelling, which does not share any walls with the primary dwelling. "Existing structure" means an existing single-family dwelling or other accessory structure that can be safely converted into habitable space under the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the city, and other applicable law. "Junior accessory dwelling unit" or "JADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 65852.22, as the same may be amended from time to time. A junior accessory dwelling unit contains at least an efficiency kitchen, which may include plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and/or physical space set aside for cooking or meal preparation facilities, which may include space for a refrigerator, sink, wet bar, and/or dishwasher. "Primary dwelling", for purposes of this chapter, means the existing or proposed single- family dwelling on the lot where an ADU would be located. "Public transit", for purposes of this chapter, has the meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 65852.20), as the same may be amended from time to time. Section 17. Subsection "K" of Section 17.32.060 (Landscape Design Requirements.) of Chapter 17.32 (Water Efficient Landscape Design) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new number "9" to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section 17.32.060 remaining unchanged: "9. Artificial/synthetic turf is not a permitted plant material in commercial, industrial, or mixed -use zones and/or multi -family projects. Artificial turf may be permitted in commercial, industrial, and/or mixed -use zones or multi -family projects when utilized for bona fide recreational facilities such as a sports field. Artificial/synthetic turf is a permitted non -plant material for single family homes when used in place of a lawn or other landscaped area of the home." 15 Section 18. The Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 15.07 (Dedications and Improvements Where No Subdivision is Involved) to Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) which shall read as follows: "Chapter 15.07 Dedications and Improvements Where No Subdivision is Involved 15.07.010 Purpose. 15.07.020 Dedications required. 15.07.030 Design of public improvements and security. 15.07.040 Deferrals of Public Improvement Requirements. 15.07.050 Exemption for Expansion of Existing Single Family Homes. 15.07.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards and requirements for dedications and improvements in connection with the development of land in which no subdivision is involved. 15.07.020 Dedications required. A. Applicants who propose new development within the city shall provide, by means of an offer of dedication or other appropriate conveyance as approved by the city attorney, the rights -of -way necessary for the construction of any street, trail, and/or bicycle path as shown on the circulation plan in the general plan or any supplemental document identified in the general plan, any applicable specific plan, or as otherwise required by the city engineer in connection with a land use entitlement pursuant to Title 17. Rights -of -way shall also be provided for improvements to existing facilities including rights -of -way for storm drains, trails, bicycle paths, or other required public facilities. All rights -of -way shall be accompanied by a title examination report and be free of all liens and encumbrances. Dedications required by this section shall be made before the issuance of a building permit for a subject property. 15.07.030 Design of public improvements and security. A. Public Improvements. Applicants shall construct public improvements to city standards and shall comply with the requirements set forth in Section 16.30.080, with the following modifications: 1. Any reference to "tentative map" or "final or parcel map" is replaced with "land use entitlement"; and 2. Any reference to "subdivider" is replaced with "applicant". B. Security. Applicants are required to guarantee the construction of public improvements by executing an improvement agreement secured by a bond or cash deposit before issuance of a building permit for the subject property. If the building permit is not exercised, the improvement obligation shall terminate and the security shall be returned. The city engineer is authorized to execute agreements on behalf of the city. The improvement agreement and security shall comply with the requirements set forth in Section 16.30.100 (A) through (E) with the following modifications: 16 1. Any reference to "subdivision improvement agreement" is replaced with "improvement agreement"; 2. Any reference to "subdivider" is replaced with "applicant"; 3. The reference in Section 16.30.100(B) to agreements being executed by "those parties executing the final or parcel map" shall be replaced with "the applicant"; and 4. The reference in Section 16.30.100(C) to "final tract map, parcel map waiver, lot line adjustment, or lot merger" is replaced with "land use entitlement". 15.07.040 Deferrals of Public Improvement Requirements. Any required frontage improvements may be deferred when deemed appropriate by the city engineer. Deferral shall be allowed only when the city engineer finds that construction is impractical due to physical constraints. When improvements are deferred, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city for the installation of all frontage improvements at a future date as determined by the city engineer. The agreement shall be approved by the city attorney. The agreement shall provide for the following: A. Construction of required improvements shall begin within ninety (90) days of the receipt of notice to proceed from the city engineer; B. In the event of default by the applicant or successors, the city is authorized to cause the construction to be done and charge the entire cost and expense to the applicant or successors, including interest from the date of notice of the cost and expense until paid; C. The agreement shall be recorded with the county recorder, at the expense of the applicant, and shall constitute: 1. Notice to all successors of title to the real property of the obligation; and 2. A lien in an amount to fully reimburse the city for the cost of constructing the improvements, including interest as outlined above, subject to foreclosure in the event of default in payment. D. In the event of litigation caused by a default of the applicant or successors, the applicant or successors agree to pay all costs involved, including reasonable attorney's fees, which shall become a part of the lien against the real property; E. The term "applicant" shall include not only the present owner but also heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns, with the intent that the obligations undertaken shall run with the real property and constitute a lien against it: and F. Other provisions deemed necessary by the city engineer. 15.07.050 Exemption for Expansion of Existing Single Family Homes. A. The following developments shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter to construct street improvements: 1. The addition, enlargement, expansion, alteration, extension, reconstruction or replacement of any existing single family dwelling and/or accessory structure up to a maximum increase in square footage of 25% to the existing dwelling or structure 17 2. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit up to 1,200 square feet in size. 3. The development of non -habitable accessory structure(s) as provided for under Section 17.06.050 of this Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts). B. A development that is exempt from the requirement to construct street improvements as provided for in this section shall remain subject to the requirement to provide the city with an irrevocable offer of dedication for the ultimate street right-of-way for any addition, enlargement, expansion, alteration, extension, reconstruction or replacement of an existing single family dwelling and/or habitable accessory structure regardless of size. C. No exemption from the requirement to construct street improvements shall be granted if the city engineer determines that the lack of street improvements in this case would be a potential danger to the public health, safety, and welfare." Section 19. Section 15.06.060 (Use of Funds.) of Chapter 15.06 (Public Facilities Development Impact Fee) of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby renamed "Accounting and Use of Development Impact Fees, and amended in its entirety to read as follows: "The City shall establish separate accounts for each category of development impact fee established by the City Council and deposit development impact fees collected into the appropriate account. The money deposited into these accounts, and any interest earnings thereon, shall be used solely for the public improvements, public services, and community amenities for which the development impact fees were imposed. Development impact fees may be used to pay the principal, interest and other costs of bonds, notes and other obligations issued or undertaken by or on behalf of the City to finance such improvements, services and amenities." Section 20. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. Section 21. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 22. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula the _day of , 2021. a Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2021- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2021, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 19 Randi Johl City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: LR20-1223 Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide Proposal: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending Titles 15 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to (1) comply with state law changes to large family day care homes, (2) clarify the standards that apply to senior housing, transitional housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, trash enclosures, self -storage or mini -warehouse facilities and to projects using the affordable housing overlay zone, (3) establish standards and requirements for dedications and improvements for developments without a subdivision, (4) update how development impact fees can be used, (5) clarify where artificial turf can be installed, and (6) make minor typographical edits and finding that this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15061 (b)(3). Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA Section 15061 (b)(3). PLACE OF HEARING: City of Temecula, Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA DATE OF HEARING: January 25, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P.M. Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition forjudicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, orvoid any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Mondaythrough Fridayfrom 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Brandon Rabidou, City of Temecula City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 694-6400. City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951 ) 694-6400 • TemeculaCA.gov January 19, 2022 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Long Range Planning Application Number LR20-1223, an Ordinance amending Title 15 & Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Citywide) Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00, for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Brandon Rabidou at (951) 506- 5142. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Enclosures: Check Copies of this letter (2) Self-addressed stamped envelopes (2) Previous Filing Fee Receipt (if applicable) 1 CD229 C:\USERS\LEGISTARVAPPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASVPDF 8\@BCL@B0090837\@BCL@B0090837.DOCX City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Long Range Planning Application Number LR20-1223, an Ordinance amending Title 15 & Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Citywide) Description of Project: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending Titles 15 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to (1) comply with state law changes to large family day care homes, (2) clarify the standards that apply to senior housing, transitional housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, trash enclosures, self -storage or mini -warehouse facilities and to projects using the affordable housing overlay zone, (3) establish standards and requirements for dedications and improvements for developments without a subdivision, (4) update how development impact fees can be used, (5) clarify where artificial turf can be installed, and (6) make minor typographical edits and finding that this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15061 (b)(3) Project Location: Citywide Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula The City Council approved the above -described project on January 18, 2022, and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) ❑ Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); ❑ Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); ❑ Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); ❑ Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) ❑ Categorical Exemption: (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) ® Other: Section 15061(b)(3) Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: Theproposed Ordinance is exemptfrom the requirements ofthe California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA') pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, changes required by state law or revisions that reflect the City's standard practice and patterns, and clarifications or typographical corrections, which do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. Contact Person/Title: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst Telephone Number (951) 506-5142 Signature: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date: Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: 2 CD229 C:\USERS\LEGISTAR\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECH NOLOG IES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@B0090837\@BCL@B0090837.DOCX Item No. 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Introduce an Ordinance Amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to Revise the Multi -Family Definition and Require that Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments Comply with Objective Design Standards and Adopt Resolution to Establish Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed - Use Development Consistent with State Housing Laws PREPARED BY: Sara Toma, AICP, Associate Planner I RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE THE MULTI- FAMILY DEFINITION AND REQUIRE THAT MULTI -FAMILY AND MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENTS COMPLY WITH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS AND MAKE THE FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3) AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65852.21(J) AND 66411.7(N) (LONG-RANGE PROJECT NO. LR18-1684) 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTI -FAMILY AND MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENTS SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: An amendment to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to revise the multi -family definition and to establish objective design standards that will apply to any housing development project or mixed used housing project that, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review, but a Specific Plan or Planned Development Overlay (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project. BACKGROUND: PC DISCUSSION In recent years, the State of California has adopted various housing laws that streamline housing approvals. Specifically, the legislature has taken steps to reduce the amount of subjective discretion jurisdictions have to deny or reduce the density of residential and residential -mixed -use projects. In that regard, towns, cities, and counties are developing objective (measurable) standards to be in conformance with state laws while ensuring quality development projects that fit their city's existing architecture styles. Development of the Objective Design Standards The development of the Objective Design Standards document has been a year -long process of working with internal departments and a consultant, with the guidance of Planning Commission and City Council infill subcommittees. Staff worked with the consultant to establish the following six architectural styles for the Objective Design Standards (sometimes referred to as "Standards"): 1. Mission — Spanish Colonial 4. American Rural 2. Craftsman 5. East Coast Traditional 3. Tuscan 6. Italianate These six styles are the most versatile and compatible with Temecula's existing neighborhoods and Specific Plans. An "objective" standard is one that involves no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criteria available and knowable to both the development applicant and public official prior to submittal. Working with these six styles, staff developed objective standards for new multi -family and mixed -use residential developments that would be applicable city-wide for projects requesting approval through a streamlined or ministerial process, or for projects that allow for discretionary review, but for which no other objective design standards exist. Infill Subcommittee Meetings In September 2020, Staff and the Consultant met with the Planning Commission Infill Subcommittee and met with the City Council Infill Subcommittee in October 2020. Staff and the Consultant started development of objective design standards with twelve potential architectural styles. These twelve styles would be narrowed, refined, and reduced to six styles, as detailed in the scope of work for the project. Staff recommended the inclusion of six architectural styles in the objective design standards, and the Subcommittees concurred with this recommendation. The subcommittees also agreed that the styles are consistent with existing architectural styles within the City. In October 2021, Staff met with the Subcommittees again to present the objective design standards hearing draft. The Subcommittees were supportive of the six architectural styles and objective design standards. The proposed objective design standards will result in high quality multi -family and mixed -use developments while meeting the requirements of State law. Relationship to Development Code and Applicability All developments must comply with standards of the Temecula Municipal Code Title 17 (Zoning). The draft ordinance amends Title 17 (Zoning) to revise the multi -family residential definition so that it applies to any project with two or more units. The draft ordinance also amends Title 17 to require that certain projects comply with Temecula Objective Design Standard for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments. These standards apply to all multi -family and mixed -use housing developments that, pursuant to State law, require ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review, but a Specific Plan or PDO does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project. These standards would apply city-wide. Planning Commission On December 1, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of the Objective Design Standards. The Planning Commission discussed compatibility of the proposed architecture styles with existing neighborhoods. During discussion of the Objective Design Standards Commissioner Turley-Trejo requested the addition an additional blue color to the Craftsman architectural style. Staff has incorporated the additional color request. The Planning Commission Staff Report and associated documents are attached. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in The Press -Enterprise on January 13, 2022 and posted outside City Hall. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the proposed Ordinance has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review as there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Ordinance revises the multi -family definition so that it applies to any housing project with two or more units and requires that multi- family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards. The proposed Ordinance will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what's currently allowed. Moreover, Government Code Sections 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) provide that an ordinance adopted to implement SB 9 is not a project under CEQA. Staff is recommending that a Notice of Exemption be prepared and be filed in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended action to adopt the Ordinance will not have any direct impact on the General Fund. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Resolution 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development "Exhibit A" 4. Notice of Public Hearing 5. Notice of Exemption 6. Planning Commission Agenda Report 7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-40 ORDINANCE NO.2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE THE MULTI- FAMILY DEFINITION AND REQUIRE THAT MULTI- FAMILY AND MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENTS COMPLY WITH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS AND MAKE THE FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3) AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21(J) AND 66411.7(N) (LONG-RANGE PROJECT NO. LR18-1684). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. In 2017, the Housing Accountability Act ("HAA") was significantly strengthened through the passage of three bills, Senate Bill ("SB") 167, Assembly Bill ("AB") 678 and AB 1515. These bills were part of a comprehensive group of laws enacted to address California's housing shortage. This signaled a significant shift in the focus of the state's housing policies from planning to production. In 2018, AB 3194 further amended and strengthened the HAA. As clarified by AB 3194, when there are inconsistencies between the General Plan and zoning regulations, the General Plan policies take precedence; and B. On January 1, 2018, SB 35, intended to help address California's housing shortage, went into effect, requiring a streamlined and ministerial review process for multi -family housing projects meeting specific qualifications; and C. On January 1, 2019, AB 2162, intended to help address California's need for supportive and emergency housing, went into effect, requiring a streamlined and ministerial review process for supportive housing meeting specific qualifications; and D. On January 1, 2020, SB 330, intended to create certainty in the development of housing projects, went into effect, speeding up the review of these project, and created restrictions on new local regulations; and E. On January 1, 2022, SB 9 will go into effect, that requires cities to ministerially approve, within single family residential zones, housing developments containing no more than two residential units and parcel maps for urban lot splits; and F. With certain limitations, the above -referenced laws permit the City to impose design standards on housing projects, so long as those standards are objective and involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. Staff developed the "Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments" (referred to as "Objective Design Standards") to establish objective design standards that will apply to any housing development project, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval. Staff also identified the need to amend a portion of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to revise the multi- family definition and to require that multi -family and mixed -use developments comply with Objective Design Standards as permitted by State law; and G. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Ordinance") on December 1, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; and H. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2021-40, recommending that the City Council adopt (1) a Resolution adopting the Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments and (2) an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula Amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to revise the multi -family definition and require that multi -family and mixed -use developments comply with objective design standards and make the finding that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and Government Code Section 65852.210) and 66411.7(n); and I. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on January 25, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or opposition of this matter; and J. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council; and K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the General Plan. The proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any changes to land use designations. The proposed amendments to Title 17 require that multi -family and mixed -use residential developments comply with objective design standards. These projects will still need to comply with the land use designation of the General Plan. N 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs, and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. Requiring that multi -family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards conforms with Goal 2 of the Design Element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to ensure "design excellence in site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signs," and Policy 2.1 to "establish and consistently apply design standards and guidelines for both residential and non-residential development," and Policy 2.3 to "provide development standards ensuring higher quality building and site design that is well integrated with the infrastructure and circulation systems." 3. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The adoption of objective design standards for multi -family and mixed -use housing developments will ensure quality designs for multi -family and mixed -use residential projects. Requiring that these project comply with objective design standards furthers Goal 2 of the Design Element of the Temecula General Plan which is to ensure "design excellence in site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signs," and with Policy 2.1 to "establish and consistently apply design standards and guidelines for both residential and non-residential development," and with Policy 2.3 to "provide development standards ensuring higher quality building and site design that is well integrated with the infrastructure and circulation systems." Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Ordinance has been deemed to be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The Ordinance revises the multi- family definition so that it applies to any housing project with two or more units and requires that multi -family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards. The adoption of the Ordinance will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what's currently allowed. Moreover, Government Code Sections 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) provide that an ordinance adopted to implement SB 9 is not a project under CEQA. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby adopts a Notice of Exemption for the proposed ordinance. Section 4. Chapter 17.06 (Residential District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Section titled "17.06.90 (Objective Design Standards — Multi -Family and Mixed -Use)" to read as follows: "Any housing development project that pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review, but a Specific Plan or a Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project shall comply with the Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments." Section 5. Table 17.06.030 (Residential Districts) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.06.030 (Residential Districts) remaining unchanged: Table 17.06.030 Residential Districts Description of Use FIR RR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H HR-SM9 Duplex (two-family dwellings) - - - 2,12 2,12 2,12 Pie Pie - Multi -Family _ _ _ _ - _ piz piz _ Notes: 12. Anv housiniz development Droiect that. pursuant to State law. reauires ministerial approval or where the housingdevelopment project is subject to discretionary review but a Specific Plan or a Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project shall comply with the Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments. Section 6. Subsection "D" of Section 17.06.070 (Residential Performance Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, (with deletions shown in strikethrough text, and additions shown in underline) with all other provisions of Section 17.06.070 remaining unchanged: "D. Multi -Family or Attached Single -Family Residential Development. The following design criteria shall apply to all new multi -family or attached single-family residential projects. 1. Obiective Design Standards. Anv housiniz development Droiect that, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review, but a Specific Plan or a Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project shall comply with the Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments. 2. Streetscape. Use creative entry treatments and other architectural features such as porches, balconies, shutters and dormers. Use a variety of complementary colors and avoid the use of a single dark color without contrast. Use various window shapes and sizes with special details such as multipaned or curved windows. Develop a consistent design theme throughout the project through the use of similar materials, colors, shapes, and forms and architectural design details. Buildings should be designed so that there is visual relief in building facades, especially those viewed from the street. This can be accomplished by using appropriate combinations of building materials, use of materials with texture or depth, providing appropriately located window or door openings and by providing variations in the building footprint. 3. Massing and Scale. The bulk of the building should be divided to reduce the apparent scale and provide visual interest. Box -like designs should be avoided. This can be accomplished through the following strategies: a. Use variations in the building footprints and facades. Such variations should be proportional to the overall bulk of the buildings with variations being greater for large buildings. b. Use a variety of shapes and forms including architectural projections such as roof overhangs, box windows, stairways, balconies, and cantilevers that create shadows on the building. c. Use contrasting vertical and horizontal elements that help to break the visual mass of the fagade into small areas. d. The bulk of the roof should be divided into smaller areas to reduce the apparent scale of the building and provide visual interest. 4. Compatibility. Where a neighborhood area has an identifiable character, new development within that neighborhood should be designed to maintain that character. This can be accomplished by designing new housing to be in scale with the existing structures by using similar or complementary materials or colors and by using similar building forms, shapes, or architectural details. Section 7. Section 17.08.030 (Use Regulations) Table 17.08.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Chapter 17.08 (Commercial/Office/ Industrial Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add footnote 9 to Residential, multi -family housing under Description of Use as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text): Description of Use NC CC HT SC PO BP LI Residential, multi -family housing - C9 - - P8,9 Notes 9. Anv housing development proiect that, pursuant to State law, reauires ministerial annroval or where the housingdevelopment project is subject to discretionary review, but a Specific Plan or a Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project shall comply with the Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments. Section 8. Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new section titled "17.10.030 Objective Design Standards — Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development) to read as follows: "Any housing development project that, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review, but a Specific Plan or a Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project shall comply with the Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments." Section 9. Article I. Generally of Chapter 17.22 (Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (POD-)) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new section titled "17.22.110 (Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed - Use Developments) to read as follows: "Any housing development project that, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review, but a Specific Plan or a Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project shall comply with the Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments." Section 10. Section 17.34.010 (Definition and illustrations of Terms) of Chapter 17.34 (Definition of Terms) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to revise the definition of "multi -family dwelling" as follows (deletions shown in strikethrough text, additions shown in underline), with all other provisions of Section 17.34.010 remaining unchanged: "Dwelling, Multifamily. "Multifamily dwelling" means a building or portion thereof and/or designed as a residence with tie two or more separate dwelling units. Section 11. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. Section 12. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 13. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 251h day of January, 2022, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTI -FAMILY AND MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine, and declare that: A. In 2017, the Housing Accountability Act was significantly strengthened through the passage of three bills, Senate Bill ("SB") 167, Assembly Bill ("AB") 678 and AB 1515. These bills were part of a comprehensive group of laws enacted to address California's housing shortage. This signaled a significant shift in the focus of the state's housing policies from planning to production. In 2018, AB 3194 further amended and strengthened the HAA. As clarified by AB 3194, when there are inconsistencies between the General Plan and zoning regulations, the General Plan policies take precedence; and B. On January 1, 2018, SB 35, intended to help address California's housing shortage, went into effect, requiring a streamlined and ministerial review process for multi -family housing projects meeting specific qualifications; and C. On January 1, 2019, AB 2162, intended to help address California's need for supportive and emergency housing, went into effect, requiring a streamlined and ministerial review process for supportive housing meeting specific qualifications; and D. On January 1, 2020, SB 330, intended to create certainty in the development of housing projects, went into effect, speeding up the review of these project, and created restrictions on new local regulations; and E. On January 1, 2022, SB 9 will go into effect, that requires cities to ministerially approve, within single family residential zones, housing developments containing no more than two residential units and parcel maps for urban lot splits; and F. With certain limitations, the above -referenced laws permit the City to impose design standards on housing projects, so long as those standards are objective and involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. Staff developed the "Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments" (referred to as "Objective Design Standards") to establish objective design standards that will apply to any housing development project that, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review, but a Specific Plan or a Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project; and G. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Objective Design Standards attached hereto as Exhibit "A" on December 1, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the city staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. H. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Objective Design Standards attached hereto as Exhibit "A". I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the adoption of the Objective Design Standards has been deemed to be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The adoption of the Objective Design Standards will not increase the intensity or density of any land use above what's currently allowed. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby adopt a Notice of Exemption for the proposed ordinance. Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments attached hereto as "Exhibit A". The City Council further resolves that the Planning Commission may revise the Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments from time to time without further review by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25t" day of January, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Objective Design Standards for Multi- Family and Mi Mixed -Use Development FIM I(My �a I Le Hrar l aF Soulf�ci n i .nl' ur uia 4'Jine C'i}iin�ry City Council Hearing Draft January 25, 2022 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY COUNCIL Maryann Edwards, Mayor Matt Rahn, Mayor Pro Tem Zak Schwank, Counci/member James "Stew" Stewart, Councilmember Jessica Alexander, Counci/member PLANNING COMMISSION Gary Watts, Chairman Lanae Turley-Trejo, Vice Chair John H. Telsio, Planning Commissioner Bob Hagel, Planning Commissioner Adam Ruiz, Planning Commissioner CITY OF TEMECULA EXECUTIVE STAFF Aaron Adams, City Manager Kevin Hawkins, Assistant City Manager Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Peter Thorson, City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Stuart Fisk, Planning Manager Matt Peters, Senior Planner Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst Sara Toma, Associate Planner l Mark Collins, Assistant Planner Scott Cooper, Associate Planner // Eric Jones, Associate Planner/1 Jaime Cardenas, Planning Technician Brian Clements, Building Official, Bui/ding & Safety Randy Wood, Plan Checker, Building & Safety CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ron Moreno, Principal Civil Engineer CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT Elsa WigIe, Assistant Fire Marsha/ CONSULTANT PlaceWorks Alan Loomis, Principal, Urban Design Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 2 ADOPTION/AMENDMENTS LOG Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. How to Use these Standards....................................................... 5 Chapter 2. Site Design Standards................................................................. 9 Chapter 3. General Building Design Standards.........................................17 Chapter 4. Mission - Spanish Colonial Revival............................................24 Chapter5. Craftsman....................................................................................31 Chapter6. Tuscan.......................................................................................... 38 Chapter 7. American Rural............................................................................45 Chapter 8. East Coast Traditional................................................................52 Chapter 9. Italianate......................................................................................59 Chapter 10. Definitions...................................................................................66 Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 4 1.1 PURPOSE The Objective Design Standards provide a clear set of architectural and site design requirements for new multi -family residential, including mixed -use developments. Objective Design Standards are numeric and/or quantifiable and can be measured as opposed to subjective standards, which require interpretation. These standards will ensure development maintains the unique character and quality of design within the City of Temecula. The State of California continues to enact new laws that accelerate housing production by streamlining the approval of housing development at the local level. The Objective Design Standards supplement the development standards of the City of Temecula Municipal Code and further the goals, policies, and actions of the City of Temecula General Plan, which encourages an elevated design and fosters an enhanced quality of life through the built environment. Design Standards Structure The Objective Design Standards are structured in an easily understandable document using accessible language and imagery to convey site planning and architectural requirements. There are three primary sections to these standards: 1. Site Design Standards outline best practices for the placement of buildings, the orientation of building entrances, the design of convenient pedestrian pathways, the use of landscape, and the design of outdoor spaces. Site Design Standards ensure that buildings contribute to high -quality neighborhoods and desirable places to live. 2. Building Design Standards provide general direction on disposition of building mass and scale as expressed through forms, roof lines, and fagade articulation. Building Design Standards are intended to ensure a minimum standard of design and construction quality in the development of new multi -family residential projects in City of Temecula. 3. Architectural Style Standards respond to local design precedents, regional climate conditions, and local building practices and materials. Drawn from regional vernacular and contemporary styles, the Mission - Spanish Colonial Revival, Craftsman, Tuscan, American Rural, East Coast Traditional, and Italianate descriptions included herein are intended to establish a strong, consistent design image and direction that reflects the desires, aspirations, and vision of the City of Temecula. Precedent images, descriptive text and illustrative diagrams are utilized to communicate the essential features of each style. Within each style, required design elements relating to form and massing, roofs, walls and windows, materials and colors and architectural features are outlined. Additional treatments to heighten visual interest and design integrity are noted as well. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT Page 5 Chapter 1, How to Use these Standards 1.2 APPLICABILITY These standards are applicable to any housing development project (as further defined below) that, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review but a Specific Plan or a Planned Development Overlay Zoning District (PDO-) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project. A housing development project includes (1) a multi -family residential project with two or more units, or (2) a mixed -use development that includes housing. These standards apply city- wide but shall not apply to a project if it is otherwise prohibited by State law. 1.3 USER GUIDE The Objective Design Standards are for residents, property and business owners, developers and builders, architects and designers, and City staff involved in the review and approval process of multi -family and/or mixed -use development in City of Temecula. The following steps are a quick way to understand the different sections of the document and how to use it. Additionally, this document has interactive checkboxes for each standard to facilitate an efficient review and completion of the proposed project. Step 1: Review the Site Design Standards. Site Planning involves a careful analysis of the opportunities and constraints of the site, including existing features such as mature trees, topography, and drainage patterns. The components of site development extend beyond building placement and configuration, including surrounding uses, retaining walls, landscape design, hardscape considerations, and parking. The Site Plan Design Standards outline several requirements on these topics. Step 2: Review the General Building Design Standards. While new projects need not copy existing development, their mass and scale shall respect adjacent building context and uses. The General Building Design Standards establish requirements on these issues. Standards related to garage doors and entries are also established here. These standards apply no matter which style is being utilized for the project design. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 6 Chapter 1, How to Use these Standards Step 3: Review the Architectural Style Standards. The design and detailing of buildings are paramount to a quality environment, and the City of Temecula is committed to authentic expressions of architectural style. Architectural design elements and materials shall be consistent throughout the project, recognizing that a building is 3-dimensional and must be well designed on all sides. Detailing, choice of materials, window and door choices shall reinforce the overall project design. To provide guidance on architectural styles, the Standards offer a menu of architectural traditions individual buildings may be designed in. Developments with multiple buildings may utilize more than one style if desired. However, styles may no be mixed within a single building. These styles are as follows: • Mission - Spanish Colonial Revival, • Craftsman • Tuscan, • American Rural, • East Coast Traditional, and • Italianate. Within each style description, various elements related to roof forms, windows, decorative details, and other topics are enumerated. The Architectural Style Standards require certain elements, while other elements may be selected from a menu of options. Step 4: Review the Mixed -Use Development Standards, if applicable. For developments that incorporate a commercial component in addition to residential housing, Mixed -Use Development Standards, located at the end of each chapter of architectural style, provide direction on design of storefronts, type of decorative accents, and other relevant topics. Mixed -use proposals shall be consistent with these standards. Step 5: Review the City of Temecula Municipal Code and consult with Community Development Staff. All developments must comply with the standards of the Temecula Municipal Code Title 17 (Zoning), and any applicable Specific Plan or Planned Development Overlay Zoning District. Step 6: Consultwith the Community Development Department (Planning) It is highly recommended for prospective applicants to obtain and become familiar with the application and submittal requirements fora project priorto a formal submittal. Additionally, the Community Development Department offers a Pre -Application Service that is available to the public. A pre -application allows applicants to receive staff review from various departments prior to a formal application submittal. Applicants shall follow application procedures as directed by staff. The City of Temecula Municipal Code establishes required procedures for submitting and reviewing development applications. Applicants shall follow these procedures and requirements. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 7 2.1 OVERVIEW Site planning shall result in an attractive, safe, and economically viable community. It shall minimize the visual effects of parking, feature high quality landscaping, accommodate pedestrian movement where possible, and encourage connections to surrounding environment. These site design standards shall be used in conjunction with City of Temecula Development Standards and Citywide Design Guidelines. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT Page 8 Chapter 2, Site Design Standards 2.2 BUILDING AND PARKING a. Alley access, when available, shall be utilized when garage parking is proposed. This arrangement is intended to provide maximum landscaping at the street edge, as well as front41 facades dominated by porches and entries instead of garage a doors. YES - Entries and Windows b. Curb cut on corner lots shall not be located closer than 120 feet from a curb return. Where parcel size precludes this standard, the curb cut shall be located as far from the curb return as possible. A curb return is the point where the radius of a curve or intersection ends. c. Vehicular driveways with access to the public right of way shall have sidewalks and pedestrian connections on both sides of driveway. d. Parking spaces shall be separated from buildings by a pedestrian sidewalk (minimum 4 feet) and a landscape strip (minimum 6 feet), measured from curb face, when in the right of way. e. Trash enclosures shall be separated from adjacent parking stalls with landscape planters and paved surfaces behind the curb to ensure adequate space is available for individuals to access vehicles. f. Canopy trees shall be used in parking areas to reduce the impact of large expanses of paving, to provide shade, and to reduce glare and heat build up. These trees shall have a 30- foot to 40-foot canopy potential and be sized at 24-inch box or larger at the time of installation. g. Raised planting areas, with a minimum interior dimension of 5 feet, shall be used to separate double -loaded parking areas. NO - Garage Doors The front facade shall be dominated by entries and landscape not garage doors. Parking spaces shall be separated from buildings by a pedestrian sidewalk and a landscape strip. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 9 Chapter 2, Site Design Standards h. One landscaped finger island shall be provided per every 10 spaces. Islands shall be a minimum of 5 feet (inside dimension). Drive aisle 6" min. u Landscape 7' 5' Finger Island min. min. T-6" Min. c' Landscaping finger islands should be provided 1 per 10 spaces and should be designed as illustrated Landscape islands shall be provided 1 per every 10 parking spaces. All end parking stalls shall be adjacent to landscape planters. The landscape planter shall contain a 12-inch strip of concrete inside the 6-inch curb of the planter, to create an 18-inch concrete strip for a person to step on when getting into or out of a vehicle. This step -out area shall not reduce the minimum inside dimension of the 5-foot wide landscape planter. j. Parking shall be screened from the street by landscaping, berming, low walls or fences, or buildings. k. No more than 25% of public right of way frontage shall be used for parking. I. Below -grade or structured parking must be screened from the street, and is encouraged for new mixed use development that includes a large apartment building. r Berm & 1 Landscaping � Planter "'� � wall '!„ &wall _', 3 Various methods f Zr¢ 3' high are available to r Berm ✓� shrub screen parking from the street Parking shall be screened from the street. m. Dead-end drive isles at garages or parking stall row shall include a recessed 5'-0" minimum hammerhead extending five feet into the landscape and as wide as the drive isle to permit back out. n. One tree shall be provided for every four parking spaces, see Section 17.24.050.H of City of Temecula Municipal Code. Trees shall be located within parking areas for shade potential. Where space is limited due to property line or wall proximity and walkway location, tree planter cut-outs can be used. If parking spaces are covered by shelters, exceptions to tree requirements may be requested. o. Enhanced or textured paving or stripping shall be included where pedestrian crossing occurs in parking areas. p. Non loading zones shall include appropriate striping to deter parking in these areas. q. Where multiple garages front onto an alley or street, landscaping shall be provided between every garage at a minimum size of 2' x 2' for a planting well, or 30 gallons for a planter box. Yes I NO Parking shall be located on the side or behind buildings where possible. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 10 Chapter 2, Site Design Standards 2.3 OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING a. Landscaping must be used to: • Define areas such as building entrances, key activity hubs, focal points, and the street edge; • Provide screening for service areas; and • Serve as buffers between neighboring uses. b. A minimum 5-foot wide planted parkway shall be provided on arterial corridors between the street and sidewalk. Parkways shall be planted with shade trees to provide a more pleasant pedestrian environment and to contribute to streetscape continuity. c. Flowering and fruit -bearing trees must be avoided within six feet of pedestrian walkways. d. Evergreen trees must be used to soften the appearance of blank walls and provide visual screening but shall not be a replacement for enhanced architecture. e. Plants shall be grouped in high and low maintenance zones and shall coordinate with irrigation plans to minimize the use of water and the placement of irrigation tubing. f. Landscape planting must be designed to contribute to crime prevention. Shrubs that create hiding places shall not be placed in areas of pedestrian movement, such as along walkways and building entrances. g. Drip irrigation shall be used wherever possible. No overhead irrigation is allowed within 24" of a non -permeable surface. h. Turf areas shall be placed in areas for recreational use only and must have a 10' minimum diameter. Landscape is used to define building entrance. A minimum 5-foot wide planted parkway shall be provided on arterial corridors between the street and sidewalk. Use plants to soften the appearance of blank walls. Group plants with similar irrigation needs. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 11 i. Street trees shall be 24" box with a 30' to 40' maximum spacing and consistent with the existing street tree theme or designated street tree selection per the specific plan if any. j. Palm trees shall only be used in community pool areas and as main entry focal points. k. Inorganic ground cover (gravel, river rock, etc.) is not an alternative for plant material or the required 3" mulch under shrubs and trees, and 1 1/2" mulch under groundcover from flats. It shall only be used as an accent material in combination with plants and cover no more than 15 percent of the total landscape area. I. Storm water retention requirements for your specific project area shall be reviewed with the City's Engineering Department. For a list of plant material refer to the Specific Plan and/or City of Temecula Approved Plant List. Additional plant material specifically addressing water retention areas can be gleaned from the Low Impact Development Manual for Southern California prepared by the Southern California Stormwater Monitoring Coalition. m. Provide root barrier when trees are located 5' or closer to any hardscape element or building. n. Landscaping shall comply with City of Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 17.32 Water Efficient Landscape Design. o. Trees and understory plant material shall be low water use. For a list of additional approved plant material, refer to the approved plant list (Appendix C) in City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.32.200. p. Landscaping with trees or shrubs is required where side -lot spacing between buildings is 6' or more. Street trees shall be 30' to 40' maximum spacing. Palm trees shall only be used in community pool areas and as main entry focal points. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 12 Chapter 2, Site Design Standards 2.4 UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS Applicants are encouraged to contact utility companies early in the planning stages of their projects. By consulting with their local project coordinators, applicants are made aware of the current construction requirements and design standards before g' they initiate any design work. 2.4.1. New and Existing Water Service Design Considerations: a. Underground water plans shall be provided to the City to allow Community Development staff to verify the proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check (DDCs) prior to final agreement with the utility companies. b. Double detector check valves shall be placed above ground to meet Rancho California Water District's Standard Drawing RW-20. Double detector checks shall be installed in a location that is internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, or placed in a manner that is architecturally integrated into the building design. c. The placement of DDCs and other water related utilities in alleyways, parking lots, or within a building "notch out" (internal to the project site) is required to better integrate the utility equipment into the building's architectural design. d. DDCs and other water related utilities shall not be placed adjacent to the sidewalk along the building facades that face the street. This will ensure safe and comfortable pedestrian path of travel along the sidewalks. e. Compact, vertical DDC's shall be used whenever feasible. f. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide required screening. A three-foot clear zone shall be provided around fire double detector checks as required by the Riverside County Fire Department. Utility equipment shall be grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an afterthought. DDCs and other water utility equipment shall be placed on private property and not within the right of way. Easements shall be obtained for DDCs and other water utility equipment when they are placed on private property. h. Fire Department connections shall be wall mounted on the street side of the building. Fire sprinkler risers shall not be obstructed in any manner. The fire system riser(s) is to be provided with 18" clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser. Access shall be provided by means of an exterior door with the minimum dimensions of thirty inches wide by six feet eight inches tall. The fire system riser room shall house the fire sprinkler riser(s) and main fire alarm control panel and not share with any other equipment (i.e. mechanical, electrical, etc.). The fire sprinkler riser room will be located on an accessible corner of the structure with easy access for all fire department personnel. 2.4.2. New and Existing Electrical Service Design Considerations: a. As required by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 04-02, all new electrical lines up to 34 Kv shall be undergrounded. b. All utility equipment shall be located out of the primary pedestrian path of travel. If utility equipment must encroach in the pedestrian path of travel, ensure a minimum paved clearance of three feet for ADA passage around equipment. All electrical utility equipment, electrical meters, and junction boxes shall be placed Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 13 Chapter 2, Site Design Standards within a utility room. If a utility room is not feasible, then h. Trees and shrubs shall be placed a minimum of 5' away all utility equipment shall be purposefully designed as an from water meter, gas meter, or sewer laterals; a minimum integral part of the building development, placed adjacent to of 10' away from utility poles; and a minimum of 8' away alleyways, within parking areas, or within rear or side yards, from fire hydrants and fire department sprinkler and and screened from public view. standpipe connections. c. Early coordination with Southern California Edison shall i. Electrical box doors shall be clear of any plant material or occur in order to ensure that transformers are well screened obstruction which might hinder direct access. and in compliance with utility provider's standards. 2.5 AIR CONDITIONING 2.4.3. New and Existing Natural Gas Service Design Standards: a. Ensure safe ingress and egress togas meters for maintenance, meter reading, and service while simultaneously placing equipment to reduce visiblity of meters to the public right- of-way and common areas. b. All utility equipment shall be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. All utility equipment shall be purposefully and aesthetically placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, rear or side yards, or within building "notch outs" and screened from public view. c. Gas meters shall be well screened and in compliance with utility provider's standards. A 3' wide minimum clearance shall be provided when landscaping is utilized as the screening method. d. Gas meters shall be painted to blend into the built environment. e. Consultation with Southern California Gas regarding meter cabinet design guidelines and appropriate screening methods shall occur early in the project design process. f. All in ground utility box lids shall be hot stamped with appropriate labels. a. Air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be placed in the back of the unit and not visible from public view. b. If the mechanical equipment cannot be placed in the back, it shall be either placed on the ground and screened with landscape, or placed on the roof and screened with architectural materials such as roof or parapet consistent with the overall architectural style. 2.6 REFUSE STORAGE AREAS a. All developments shall provide each unit with the appropriate number of trash containers as required by the City of Temecula trash & recycling contractor, and shall comply with the following: i. Trash enclosures shall comply with City of Temecula Waste & Recycling Guidelines for Multi -Family and Commercial Development. ii. Trash containers shall be stored within designated storage areas. iii. Locate recycling and trash enclosures away from building fronts and major entries, and/or screen such receptacles from view in fixed enclosures. g. Irrigation valve box lids will be numbered and irrigation valves iv. Trash receptacles shall be accessible for trash tagged to designate controller and sequences numbers. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT M Page 14 Chapter 2, Site Design Standards collection but shall not block circulation drives near loading areas or conflict with parking. v. Place vines on three sides of trash enclosure to deter graffiti and blend structure into the landscape. Provide vines on two sides of trash enclosure if enclosure is attached to a building. vi. Enclosures shall be separated from adjacent parking stalls with a minimum 5' wide planter area. vii. Provide a separate side pedestrian access to all trash enclosures. 2.7 WATER HEATER a. Each dwelling unit shall have a separate hot water heater or may be provided with a centralized circulation water heater system sufficient to serve all dwelling units on the property. b. The location of the water heater shall be incorporated into the design of each unit. No exterior water heater enclosures shall be permitted. Water heaters must not be visible. c. Water heaters may be substituted with tankless water heaters. Tankless water heaters shall be listed by an approved testing agency (UL, UPC, etc.) and be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements. 2.8 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS a. The station installation and equipment shall be consistent with the rules and regulations in CALGreen Building Standards Code and CBC Chapter 11A and 11B as applicable. b. Required designated parking spaces for carpool/vanpool vehicles, electric vehicles, and zero emissions vehicles shall be conveniently located close to building entrances. c. Signage. Each charging station space shall be posted with signage indicating the space is only for electric vehicle charging purposes. Days and hours of operation shall be included if it has time limits. d. Clearance. Charging station equipment mounted on pedestals, light posts, bollards or other devices shall be a minimum of 24 inches clear from the face of curb. e. Charging Station Equipment. Charging station outlets and connector devices shall be no less than 36 inches or no higher than 48 inches from the top of surface where mounted, and shall contain a retraction device and/or a place to hang permanent cords and connectors sufficiently above the ground or paved surface. f. Charging Station Equipment Protection. When the electric vehicle charging station space is perpendicular or at an angle to curb face and charging equipment, adequate equipment protection, such as wheel stops or concrete - filled steel bollards shall be used. g. Charging Station Location. Charging station shall not be placed within any portion of the required parking space area (i.e. 9' x 18'). Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 15 Chapter 2, Site Design Standards 2.9 WALLS AND FENCES a. A combination of elements, including decorative masonry walls, berms, and landscaping, shall be used to screen objects at the ground plane. b. Fences and walls shall be constructed as low as permitted while still performing screening, noise attenuation, and security functions. c. All exterior perimeter walls located along public streets shall have an offset a minimum of 5 feet deep for every 50 linear feet to 75 linear feet of the wall length. d. All non -transparent perimeter walls shall incorporate standards to provide for wall inserts and/or decorative columns or pilasters every 20 feet to provide relief. e. All non -transparent perimeter walls and/or fences shall be architecturally treated on both sides and shall incorporate landscaping whenever possible. f. All fences and walls required for screening purposes shall be of solid material. Chain link fencing with inserts shall not be used. g. Fences placed adjacent to a street shall be screened with a landscape buffer consistent with Development Code standards. h. Walls and fences shall be designed with materials and finishes that complement project architecture and be planted with vines, shrubs, and trees. k. Parking lot screening shall be a minimum of three feet in height at the time of installation, measured from the interior of the parking lot. I. A minimum 15 feet of landscaped setback shall be provided for parking lots adjacent to the street edge and shall include one or more of the following: • rolling berms (2:1 slope) • low screen walls • changes in elevation • landscaping 2.10 SITE LIGHTING a. Light fixtures shall be architecturally compatible with the building design. b. All building entrances shall be well -lit. c. Street lighting within development shall be a maximum of 15 feet high. d. Walkways and paseos shall be illuminated with a minimum of 1 foot-candle to ensure safe nighttime conditions. e. Parking lots and access thereto shall be illuminated with a minimum of 1 foot-candle of lighting. f. The design of parking lot lighting fixtures shall be compatible with the development's architectural style. 2.11 MAILBOXES i. Walls on sloping terrain shall be stepped to follow the terrain. a. Common mailbox enclosures shall be designed using the j. Similar elements, such as columns, materials, and cap details, same materials and colors as the surrounding residential shall be incorporated on perimeter walls that transition from buildings. one development to another. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT M Page 16 3.1 BUILDING FORM a. Multi -family development adjacent to single-family neighborhoods shall provide a buffer of single story and/ or detached units along the adjoining property line. b. No more than six side -by -side dwelling units shall be attached in any single structure. c. The maximum length of any individual building containing townhouse dwelling units or multifamily dwelling units shall be 200 linear feet, regardless of the number of units. d. For every 100 feet of building length, there shall be a plane - break along the facade comprised of an offset of at least five feet in depth by 25 feet in length. The offset shall extend from grade to the highest story. e. The street -facing front fagades of buildings shall be articulated with wall offsets (e.g., projections or recesses in the facade plane) that are at least two feet deep and spaced no more than 30 feet apart. No more than 6 attached units be permitted in a single structure. Break development into separate vertical planes to reduce the appearance of bulk. Creating variation in mass and building height is encouraged. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT Page 17 Chapter 3. General Building Design Standards f. In addition to wall offsets, street -facing front fapades shall provide at least three of the following articulation elements: i. A covered porch; ii. A recessed entrance; iii. One or more dormer windows or cupolas; iv. Pillars, posts, or pilasters; v. One or more bay windows projecting at least 12 inches from the fapade plane; vi. Eaves projecting at least four inches from the fapade plane; vii. Raised corniced parapets over the entrance door; viii. Multiple windows with a trim at least four inches wide; or ix. Integral planters that incorporate landscaped areas or places for sitting. g. Corner buildings at street intersections shall incorporate architectural elements including prominent towers, cornice features, roof shapes and roof line variation. h. The massing of upper stories, particularly those over a garage, shall be modulated by stepping back elements a minimum of two feet from the ground floor setback, and/or through the use of projecting bays. i. Structures three stories or more should emphasize horizontal planes through the use of trim, awnings, eaves, other ornamentation, or a combination of complementary colors. j. The upper story of buildings over two stories shall be stepped back to reduce the scale of fapades facing streets, courtyards, or open space areas. k. Combinations of one, one and -one-half, and two-story units are encouraged to create variation in mass and building height. I. For row -type townhouses, each unit shall be varied in height and setback. m. At least two different architectural styles, as defined in Chapter 4, shall be included in projects with more than ten buildings. However, different styles may not be mixed within a single building. The upper story shall be stepped back to reduce the scale of fagades. For row -type townhouses, each unit shall be varied in height and setback. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 18 Chapter 3. General Building Design Standards 3.2 ROOF FORM IN a. Multi -family buildings shall be designed to create varying roof forms (e.g., gabled, hipped, and shed roof combinations and break up the massing of the building.S b. Rooflines shall be broken at intervals no greater than 50 feet long by changes in height or stepbacks. c. Deep roof overhangs (eight inches minimum) are required to Multi -form roof combinations are encouraged. create shadow and add depth to facades. d. Where applicable to the architectural style, any roof eaves shall extend a minimum of twenty-four (24) inches from the primary wall surface to enhance shadow lines and articulation of surfaces. e. When employed hipped or gable roofs shall cover the entire building. Mansard roofs or segments of pitched roofs applied at the building edge shall not be used unless permitted by the architectural style. f. If the interior side of a parapet is visible from pedestrian view, it shall be finished with the same materials and a similar level of detail as the front fapade. g. If parapets are used, one or more of the following detail treatments should be included: pre -cast elements, continuous banding or projecting cornices, dentils, caps, corner details, or variety in pitch (sculpted). h. Rooftop equipment shall be screened so that it is not visible by pedestrians in the public right of way. shadow and add depth to facades. t; The parapet is the same material as the front fagade. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 19 Chapter 3. General Building Design Standards 3.3 WINDOWS, DOORS, AND ENTRIES a. Window and door type, material, shape, and proportion shall be dictated by the architectural style of the building. b. As defined by the architectural style, windows shall be generously inset from building walls to create shade and shadow detail. The minimum inset shall be 3" inches for wood siding, 3"-6" for stucco, and C-12" for masonry. c. Windows shall be articulated with sills, trim, kickers, shutters, or awnings authentic to the architectural style of the building. d. Faux shutters shall be two shutters to each window opening. e. Each unit's entry shall be easily identifiable, distinguishable, and oriented to the street whenever possible. f. Upper floor entries shall have a distinct design that complements the main building frontage. g. Long, monotonous balconies and corridors that provide access to multiple units shall be avoided. Instead, access points shall be clustered. h. Project icons, thematic pilasters, special paving treatment, and specialty landscaping shall be used at building and common space entryways to unify a project. The minimum inset shall be three inches. 3.4 ARTICULATION a. Architectural elements that add visual interest, scale, and character, such as recessed or projecting balconies, trellises, recessed windows, verandas, and porches, are required. b. Stairways shall be designed as an integral part of the overall architecture of the building, complementing the building's mass and form. Exterior stairwells shall be solid; prefabricated metal stairs are prohibited. �1 i Balconies, trellises, and porches add visual interest to the structure. Stairways shall be designed as an integral part of the overall architecture Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 20 Chapter 3. General Building Design Standards 3.5 MATERIALS AND COLORS a. As defined by the architectural style, materials and textures shall vary between the base and body of a building to break up large wall planes and add visual base to the building. b. Material changes shall occur at intersecting planes, preferably at inside corners of changing wall planes or where architectural elements intersect, such as a chimney, pilaster, projection, or fence line. c. Contrasting colors shall be used for trim, windows, doors, and key architectural elements. Heavier materials and textures shall be used lower on the building elevation to form the building base. 3.6 GARAGE DOORS a. Garages and garage doors shall be located on secondary facades and designed to minimize their visual impact and minimize the dominance of garage doors on the street. b. Garage entries, loading and service entries, utility rooms, stairs, elevators, and other similar inactive elements shall occupy no more than 20% of the width of a public street facing building fagade. c. Garage doors shall be designed consistent with the overall style of the building. Material, pattern, and color to be coordinated with architectural style. d. Where visible by the public or by other residents, garage entrances shall be recessed and/or accompanied by projecting elements like porches, bay windows, trellises, architectural ornament, and/or landscaping. Garage entrances shall be recessed. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 21 Chapter 3. General Building Design Standards 3.7 MIXED -USE This document also presents standards for residential mixed - use projects in City of Temecula. The purpose of the mixed -use residential standards is to allow for a variety of housing types in the city that serve all types of households, while also achieving neighborhood goals for an active pedestrian realm along transit corridors, an attractive street appearance, and minimizing impacts on neighboring properties. The standards are also to ensure a quality living environment that will be desirable and hold its value over time. When mixed -use residential projects are well designed, they can provide good quality housing and an active and vibrant commercial corridor. Mixed -use residential development is typically a multistory building with commercial uses on a ground floor, and a shared residential entry lobby, and common access areas such as hallways or stairways that lead to individual residential units above or behind the commercial uses. Parking is often shared, whether in a garage or parking lot. In certain instances, if a project is located on a large site, there may be a mixture of residential unit types, for example multi- family apartments and townhomes. In this case, each unit type shall be designed to the specific standards and guidelines of the unit type. Mixed use projects shall comply with all applicable standards in this document in addition to the following standards. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 22 Chapter 3. General Building Design Standards Below are additional design standards for mixed -use projects. a. Primary entrances shall be visible from the adjoining street. The primary entrances of buildings shall be identified and highlighted through architectural details, lighting, and signage. b. At sidewalk level, buildings shall be primarily transparent. At least fifty (50) percent of the building frontage facing a public street, primary pedestrian way, or parking lot shall be devoted to pedestrian -oriented features (e.g., storefronts, pedestrian entrances to nonresidential uses; transparent display windows; landscaping). c. Variations in the front building plane shall be incorporated through the use of varying building setbacks, variations in wall planes, and the inclusion of pedestrian amenities. d. When nonresidential and residential uses are located in a vertical mixed -use structure, separate pedestrian entrances shall be provided for each use. e. The pedestrian entrance to residential portions of the building or additional commercial suites (upper floors) shall be accessed through a street level lobby, architecturally integrated entry corridor, from an adjacent alley, or from an internal parking area. f. Vehicular access shall be provided through the alley when present. For lots without an alley, vehicular access shall be provided from the secondary street. g. For lots without a secondary street frontage and without alley access, vehicular access may be permitted from the primary street. In this case, reciprocal or shared access is encouraged to decrease the number of driveways taking access from the primary street frontage. h. On a corner lot, the building shall be located no more than 20 feet from either adjacent street property line. i. Buildings on corner lots shall be oriented toward the primary intersection and the primary and secondary street frontages, while parking and auto access shall be located away from the primary intersection corners. j. Parking shall not be visible from the primary street. k. Parking entrances that impact the aesthetics of any building facade facing the street shall be architecturally integrated into the building facade. Buildings shall incorporate a variety of design elements to create an attractive streetscape. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 23 4.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION Derived from Spanish/Mediterranian and early Californian influences, these styles emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Projects a visually rich environment with allusions to regional history. Generally, Spanish Colonial Revival style buildings are asymmetrically arranged. The style features low-pitched roofs with little or no overhang covered with S Type Clay red roofing tiles. These houses were almost always wood frame with stucco siding. The use of the arch was common, especially above doors, porch entries and main windows. x6VIlSCelW0114eZe":RX;ZeZ6I11 ARCHED WINDOWS OVERHANGING EAVES WITH EXPOSED RAFTER TAILS RED CLAY TILE ROOFS TALL, DOUBLE —HUNG WINDOWS Ali 01 444 ARCHED EN DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURES RECESSED ENTRANCES i DECORATIVE IRON GRILLES Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT BALCONY SMALL PORCH Page 24 Chapter 4. Mission - Spanish Colonial Revival 4.2 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ELEMENTS A. FORM & MASSING Required Elements i. Asymmetrical fagade/elevations ii. Multiple roof planes iii. Balconies or small porches iv. Entrances recessed at least 12" Required Elements (Choose at least 1 ) v. Arcades supported by columns vi. Articulated facades with massing breaks every 50' W r Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 25 Chapter 4. Mission - Spanish Colonial Revival B. ROOF DESIGNS Required Elements i. Low pitched roof (4:12 maximum) ii. Red, fired, clay tile roofs. Common shapes include both Spanish (S-shaped) and Mission (halfcylinder) types iii. Shallow eaves iv. Overhanging eaves (minimum 24 inches on elevation that face a public street) with exposed rafter tails or beams v. Small V-0" or less decorative exposed rafter tails Optional Elements (Choose at least 2) vi. Gabled and shed roofs, gabled roofs are on the side and front facing vii. Shaped parapet with coping viii. Brackets or knee braces at gabled ends ix. Hipped -roof towers or belvederes (square, rectangular or circular in plan) ■ Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 26 Chapter 4. Mission - Spanish Colonial Revival C. WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS Required Elements i. White or tan stucco wall with smooth or lightly textured finish (i.e. hand troweled or smaller particles) ii. Arched (flat arch or semi circle arch) windows iii. Recessed windows with sill and/or headers surrounds iv. Simple divisions of window muntins Optional Elements (Choose at least 1 for at least 65% of the total windows) v. Casement windows, typically arranged in pairs vi. Tall, double -hung windows LM a �4 _�_ "^�, h�Cy. a s7 s '^� •h III Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 27 Chapter 4. Mission - Spanish Colonial Revival D. MATERIALS & COLORS Required Elements i. Window frames in dark color such as black, dark brown, forest green, and navy blue Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 28 II'ir a>n n c' SMALL P !EDECORATIVETILE CL WO WROUGHT IRON RAILING COURTYARDS RECESSED NICHES WINDOW GRILLES DARK METAL OR WROUGHT IRON STUCCO FINISH CHIMNEY PAIRED WOOD GARAGE FABRIC AWNINGS WITH LIGHT FIXTURE WITH CURVING IWITHROUNDOR DOORS WITH IRON METAL SPEAR SUPPORTS BRACKETS RECTANGULAR OPENINGS HARDWARE MIXED -USE ELEMENTS Required Elements i. Ground -floor storefronts differentiated from upper - story facades by material change or entablature ii. Windows surrounded by stucco shall be recessed from the face of the facade at least 6 inches iii. Provide shade via arcades, trellises or awnings iv. Use wood, iron, glazed tile, plaster and stone as decorative accents Optional Elements (Choose at least 2) v. Horizontal orientation with towers as vertical accents at corners and entries vi. Exposed rafter tails and brackets vii. Crown molding viii. Arched openings around windows and doors ix. Thick arches springing from piers DUPLEX AND TRIPLEX ELEMENTS Required Elements i. All design elements shall be consistent with Mission - Spanish Colonial Revival standards ii. Driveway access shall be shared by all units iii. A common sharred walkway / pedestrian pathway shall be provided to access front doors to all units iv. If pedestrian access and driveway access is provided via the same pathway, decorative paving materials shall be employed in lieu of poured concrete or asphalt paving v. All units shall have private outdoor space measuring a minimum of 8 feet x 6 feet; said outdoor space may be provided via an at -grade patio, courtyard, yard, or an upper -level terrace, including a roof terrace. vi. Garden walls shall be used to delinate private outdoor space provided to individual units, if said outdoor space is provided at -grade 5.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION The Craftsman or California Bungalow style is derived from the influential residential style that emerged in the early 20th century out of the Arts and Crafts movement. In City of Temecula, this style is deployed to create a visually rich residential environment with allusions to regional history. As indicated in the accompanying precedent images and illustrative diagram, recognizable elements include the artful use of wood and natural materials, low-pitched gabled or hipped roofs, horizontal orientation and earth - toned colors. Common design elements also include exposed rafters and beams under eaves, decorative brackets and fasteners, full- or partial -width porches and large columns or piers. Though this style exhibits a horizontal emphasis, vertical architectural elements are often deployed to accentuate corners and entrances. Period Craftsman residences often featured exterior cladding of wood shingles or clapboard siding and details such as extended lintels and decorative lighting with geometric detailing. WINDOW WITH MULLION AND DIVIDED LITES OVERHANGING EAVES WITH RAFTERTAILS INCORPORATE BUILDING BASE WITH NATURAL MATERIAL CONTINUOUS MOLDING EMPHASIZES HORIZONTALITY LOW PITCHED GABLE ROOF BALCONY TRELLIS WOOD 4-POST COLUMN WITH STONE PIER Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT Page 32 Chapter 5. Craftsman 5.2 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ELEMENTS A. FORM & MASSING Required Elements i. Multiple roof planes ii. Porches or balconies iii. Design elements that emphasize horizontal orientation; such as long window groupings, fencing, rails, siding, balconies iv. Articulated facades with massing breaks every 25 feet minimum W i Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 33 Chapter 5. Craftsman B. ROOF DESIGNS Required Elements Low- to moderate -pitched gable or hipped roofs (typically from 6:12 to 8:12) ii. Overhanging eaves (minimum 24 inches along primary elevation) with exposed rafter tails or beams iii. Brackets or knee braces at gabled ends iv. Use of wood or asphalt shingle (or fiber cement imitation or imitation synthetic asphalt shingles) Optional Element v. Chimneys visible at the exterior and located on the side fagade are acceptable Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 34 Chapter 5. Craftsman C. WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS Required Elements i. Windows shall have mullion and divided lites ii. Use of wood shingles, clapboard siding, or fiber cement siding iii. Utilize wood trim around windows and doors iv. Window and door trim color shall contrast with color of walls V .T M pp iSEEN I=1- Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 35 Chapter 5. Craftsman 1W'W D. MATERIALS & COLORS Required Elements i. Extensive use of wood (or imitation wood fiber cement siding) and natural materials such as arroyo stone or bricks ii. Use of dark, neutral, earth -toned color pallete, such as browns and greens or beach -inspired pallete, such as light blues, aquas and whites. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 36 KNEE BRACE 4ap' r' BARGEBOARD EXPOSED I RAFTERTAILS i DECORATIVE r' ATTIC/GABLE VENT EXTENDED LINTELS . ABOVE WINDOWS EXTENDED LINTEL ABOVEDOOR 9 1 STONE PIER AND BATTERED METAL FRAME WITH WOOD SUPPORT GEOMETRIC PATTERI r. WRAPAROUND PORCH WITH LOW WALL Y DORMERS ON FRONT FACADE SECOND -STORY BALCONY RECTANGULAR OR ROUND DOWNSPOUTS MIXED -USE ELEMENTS Required Elements i. Gable or shed roof entry porch and/or building form projection ii. Clapboard or shingle siding and wooden accents iii. Sash windows with multiple small panes above single large pane Optional Elements (Choose at least 2) iv. One gabled or shed dormer (side -gabled version only) centered along elevations visible from the public right-of-way with small single window or paired windows v. Porch supported by piers that extend to the ground vi. Porch enclosed by wooden railings or clapboard or shingle cladding or masonry or stone vii. Paired and/or ribbon windows, including narrow windows placed on both sides of a broad window r Ago I I��' DUPLEX AND TRIPLEX ELEMENTS Required Elements i. All design elements shall be consistent with Craftsman standards ii. Driveway access shall be shared by all units iii. A common sharred walkway / pedestrian pathway shall be provided to access front doors to all units iv. If pedestrian access and driveway access is provided via the same pathway, decorative paving materials shall be employed in lieu of poured concrete or asphalt paving v. All units shall have private outdoor space measuring a minimum of 8 feet x 6 feet; said outdoor space may be provided via an at -grade patio, courtyard, yard, a raised front porch, or an upper -level terrace, including a roof terrace. vi. Garden walls shall be used to delinate private outdoor space provided to individual units, if said outdoor space is provided at -grade 6.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION A interpretation of traditional Mediterranean architectural style based on precedents found in the Spanish Revival style joined by rural Italian elements. This style harkens to the Mediterranean variants found throughout California, with rustic elements that speak to City of Temecula's rural context. As indicated in the accompanying precedent images and illustrative diagram, recognizable elements include the use of stone and stucco, light earth tones, and red tiled roofs. Classical elements such as columns and arches and decorative iron work add visual complexity. Squared towers and projections speak to Italianate references. Porches and porticoes are common, as are vertically -oriented recessed windows. 11E] n n ARCHED OPENING RED CLAYTILES WINDOW WITH FLAT LINTEL AND DIVIDED LITES OVERHANGING EAVES VARIATION OF ROOF PLANES EXPOSED RAFTERTAILS VERTICALLY -ORIENTED RECESSED WINDOWS SQUARED PROJECTION REFERENCES ITALIANATE PRECEDENTS DECORATIVE METAL LIGHT FIXTURE RECESSED ENTRY USE OF STONE AND .� SMOOTH STUCCO WITH LIGHT EARTH TONES Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT Page 40 Chapter 6. Tuscan 6.2 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ELEMENTS Required Elements i. Asymmetrical arrangement of windows and design elements along primary elevation ii. Porches, porticoes and/or Juliet balconies iii. Recessed entries A. FORM & MASSING in - 1161 � 116I l�- r &.UILW 11VIVE I" ! C Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 41 Chapter 6. Tuscan B. ROOF DESIGNS Required Elements i. Flat or low to moderate -pitched roof (maximum 6:12 slope) ii. Red -toned clay tiles iii. Variation of roof planes iv. Overhanging eaves (minimum 12 inches along primary elevation) M mol , Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 42 Chapter 6. Tuscan C. WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS Required Elements i. Vertically oriented rectangular or arched windows arranged in asymmetrical patterns ii. Casement or double -hung sash with flat or arched lintels iii. Walls shall be composed of predominantly flat surfaces iv. Windows shall be recessed 3 to 12 inches from outer wall v. Divided lite windows Optional Elements (Choose at least 1 ) vi. Pedimented or framed windows vii. Paired decorative wood shutters r Rv r oe s Is n -' 0 119�. Q r S Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 43 Chapter 6. Tuscan D. MATERIALS & COLORS Required Elements i. Incorporate rough-hewn stone as accent feature ii. Flat stucco walls in light earth tones qk ter, Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 44 /l. �� 177 RAFTER EXTENSIONS ANTUCCO IND SHALLOW JULIET BALCONIES BRACKETS w� ��. STUCCO OR STONE RECTANGULAR OR ARCHED DOOR LIGHT /DARK WOOD CHIMNEYS DES OVERHANGS Al ARCADE OR PORCH AT ENTRY USE OF BRICK, STONE OR WOOD DECORATIVE IRO K (WINDOW GRILLES, COLUMNS RAILINGS, LIGHT FIXTURES, DECORATIVE PLANTERS) MIXED -USE ELEMENTS Required Elements i. Arches above doors and windows ii. Use of brick, stone or wood columns Optional Elements (Choose at least 1) iii. Facade most commonly symmetrical iv. Smooth stucco with simple stone window and door surrounds is considered w'T rR DUPLEX AND TRIPLEX ELEMENTS Required Elements i. All design elements shall be consistent with Tuscan standards ii. Driveway access shall be shared by all units iii. A common sharred walkway / pedestrian pathway shall be provided to access front doors to all units iv. If pedestrian access and driveway access is provided via the same pathway, decorative paving materials shall be employed in lieu of poured concrete or asphalt paving v. All units shall have private outdoor space measuring a minimum of 8 feet x 6 feet; said outdoor space may be provided via an at -grade patio, courtyard, yard, or an upper -level terrace, including a roof terrace. vi. Garden walls shall be used to delinate private outdoor space provided to individual units, if said outdoor space is provided at -grade L 7.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION American Rural is a interpretation of traditional rural residential forms and materials. This style reflects City of Temecula's agricultural and ranching history and regional context. As indicated in the accompanying precedent images and illustrative diagram, the style utilizes elements such as vertical or horizontal wood siding, monochrome colors with contrasting accents and sparse or simple ornamentation. Roofs are typically medium to high-pitched. Minimal detailing often includes awnings, porches and wall - mounted gooseneck lights. HIGH PITCHED ROOF HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL WOOD BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING MULTIPLE ROOF PLANES FIXED AWNING WITHOUT SIDES t ACCENTUATED VERTICAL ORIENTATION _V Lu/ / CASEMENT WINDOWS WITH MUNTINS DORMERS LOR WITH ENTS �J Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT Page 48 Chapter 7. American Rural 7.2 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ELEMENTS U Required Elements i. The facades emphasize verticality. ii. Incorporate farm and ranch forms inspired by barns, silos, sheds, tank houses and granary towers iii. Multiple gable and shed roof planes iv. Covered porches and awnings to break up volumes between lower and upper floors FORM & MASSING �e E H:' o nI1�;E'eF�13 �� Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 49 Chapter 7. American Rural Required Elements i. Medium to high-pitched (minimum 6:12 slope) ii. Front and/or side facing gables iii. Variation in heights and/or planes iv. Asphalt shingle, metal roofs or synthetic slate shingles B. ROOF DESIGNS I C Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 50 Chapter 7. American Rural C. WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS Required Elements i. Utilize board and batten siding, corrugated panels to give texture and variation to exterior walls ii. Siding materials include wood, engineer wood, vinyl, steel, fiber cement iii. Minimal molding around window and door openings iv. Double hung or casement windows with muntins Optional Elements (Choose at least 1 ) v. Horizontal or vertical siding vi. Contrast color of window sash with color of the body of the building III it - -- I Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 51 Chapter 7. American Rural D. MATERIALS & COLORS Required Elements i. Unadorned materials: metal, wood, masonry ii. Neutral or muted colors shall be predominant iii. Monochrome accents of doors, windows or architectural features iv. Stucco prohibited c Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 52 WIDE FRONT PORCH OR BALCONY WITH SIMPLE COLUMNS ME 1 ■ 0 .IN CARRIAGE -STYLE GARAGE DOORS 11 �1 IRON -INSPIRED BARN -STYLE LIGHTING r'" F-® 7,11 =-- „ METAL AWNING WITHOUT SIDES IMillij.! DARK SHUTTERS AND WINDOW SHED DORMERS SASHES PORCHES WITH ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE CEILING FANS Mrs 0 w ■ i SIMPLE GABLE BRACKETS, VENTS AND TRIM iii SANS SERIF FONT HOUSE NUMBERS MIXED -USE ELEMENTS Required Elements i. Windows and doors shall be expressed with large openings with a minimum size of 6'x6 ii. Utilize board and batten siding, corrugated panels to give texture and variation to exterior walls iii. Utilize siding in a vertical (board and batten) or horizontal pattern to give texture and variation to exterior walls iv. Doors and Windows shall be framed with wood trim v. Wall -mounted gooseneck lights Optional Elements (Choose at least 2) vi. Utilize weathered or unfinished materials to communicate authenticity vii. Awnings and trims that contrast with primary facade color are encouraged viii. Awnings and trellises utilized to mitigate glare and heat N 1 DUPLEX AND TRIPLEX ELEMENTS Required Elements i. All design elements shall be consistent with American Rural standards ii. Driveway access shall be shared by all units iii. A common sharred walkway / pedestrian pathway shall be provided to access front doors to all units iv. If pedestrian access and driveway access is provided via the same pathway, decorative paving materials shall be employed in lieu of poured concrete or asphalt paving v. All units shall have private outdoor space measuring a minimum of 8 feet x 6 feet; said outdoor space may be provided via an at -grade patio, courtyard, yard, a raised front porch, or an upper -level terrace, including a roof terrace. vi. Garden walls shall be used to delinate private outdoor space provided to individual units, if said outdoor space is provided at -grade .4 8.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION The East Coast Traditional styles of multi -family housing incorporate elements of American domestic architecture dating back to the early English and Dutch houses built in the first century of colonial settlement. These precedents have been interpreted and re -interpreted during successive waves of residential design and development over the past 140 years, and presently incorporate an eclectic mixture of elements. Common characteristics of new East Coast Traditional buildings include materials such as wood and brick; front entrances accentuated with pediments and pilasters; windows with double - hung sashes and articulated lintels and sills; and porches supported by thin columns. RECTANGULAR DOUBLE - HUNG WINDOWS WITH LINTEL AND SILL DETAIL SHUTTERS CONTRAST WITH BODY COLOR ------- MAIN ENTRY ACCENTUATED WITH PEDIMENT AND PILASTERS DECORATIVE ROOF VENT — DENTIL MOLDING ALTERNATING COLORS AND MATERIALSfr'4'' SIDE -GABLED MEDIUM -PITCHED ROOF WITH ASPHALT SHINGLES R� S� FLAT FAgADE SHALLOW PORCH WITH SLENDER COLUMNS Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT Page 56 Chapter 8. East Coast Traditional 8.2 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ELEMENTS Required Elements i. Accentuated front entrance ii. Flat facades iii. Porches and shallow projections allowed iv. Side -gabled and front -gabled roof forms A. FORM & MASSING 1 Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development i Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 57 Chapter 8. East Coast Traditional B. ROOF DESIGNS Required Elements i. Medium to High-pitched roof (minimum 6:12 slope) ii. Asphalt shingles or synthetic slate shingles Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development i Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 58 Chapter 8. East Coast Traditional C. WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS Required Elements i. Rectangular windows oriented vertically ii. Windows detailed with arched or flat lintels and sills iii. Double -hung sashes with muntins Optional Elements (Choose at least 1 ) iv. Dormer Windows v. Shutters (sized to match adjoining window openings) vi. Bay or pop -out window assemblies r L L Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development i Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 59 Chapter 8. East Coast Traditional D. MATERIALS & COLORS Required Elements i. Brick cladding, wood, engineer wood, or vinyl siding cladding ii. Attached townhomes shall alternate color and cladding from one unit to the next iii. Off-white and earth tones, muted colors iv. Asphalt shingles v. Stucco prohibited Optional Elements vi. When shutters are utilized, their color shall contrast with the body of the building 1 NM I= In Ili11 err m ■ t rons ell, Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development i Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 60 dm PORCH WITH SLENDER COLUMNS CORNICE RETURNS ON THE GABLE ENDS II ■r � LF 4 ENTRY DOOR MAY HAVE PILASTERS OR A CROWN •\ AWN F, ARCHED WINDOW WITH A KEYSTONE DETAIL y 1 � PEDIMENTED ENTRY PORCH DECORATIVE ATTIC VENTS FRONT DOOR WITH DENTAL MOLDINGS ALONG THE EAVES SIDELIGHTS AND ARCHED MIXED -USE ELEMENTS Required Elements i. Utilize wooden trim around windows and doors ii. Utilize board and batten siding, corrugated panels to give texture and variation to exterior walls iii. Entrance shall be expressed with large openings with a minimum size of 6'x6' Optional Elements (Choose at least 2) iv. Awnings and trims that contrast with primary facade color are encouraged v. Awnings and trellises utilized to mitigate glare and heat vi. Wall -mounted gooseneck lights k MO m 71 .yyyy w+ }I E. DUPLEX AND TRIPLEX ELEMENTS Required Elements i. All design elements shall be consistent with East Coast Traditional standards ii. Driveway access shall be shared by all units iii. A common sharred walkway / pedestrian pathway shall be provided to access front doors to all units iv. If pedestrian access and driveway access is provided via the same pathway, decorative paving materials shall be employed in lieu of poured concrete or asphalt paving v. All units shall have private outdoor space measuring a minimum of 8 feet x 6 feet; said outdoor space may be provided via an at -grade patio, courtyard, yard, a raised front porch, or an upper -level terrace, including a roof terrace. vi. Garden walls shall be used to delinate private outdoor space provided to individual units, if said outdoor space is provided at -grade "lei b 9.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION The Italianate style originated in England during the early 19th century as a part of the Picturesque movement, a reaction to the more formal classical ideals that were expressed through art and architecture at the time. Italianate architecture is based upon the characteristics of informal Italian farmhouses. The style migrated to the United States during the 1830s and remained popular here through the 1870s. In California, the Italianate style is synonymous with the state's early mansions and was typically applied in less formal fashion than in eastern and midwestern states. LO\ WIT RE SHA HOR0 ORNAMENTAL CORNICE LARGE, DECORATIVE BRACKETS FLATTRIM WITH A KEYSTONE BAY WINDOWS DOOR WITH LARGE PANES OF GLASS COLUMNED ENTRYWAY RECESSED ENTRY Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Dec 1, 2021 DRAFT Page 64 Chapter 9. Italianate 9.2 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ELEMENTS A. FORM & MASSING Required Elements i. Blocky with no curved walls and in both asymmetrical arrangements as well as simple, symmetrical layouts Optional Elements (Choose at least 1 ) ii. Urban rowhouses or mixed -use buildings typically feature symmetrical elevations iii. All types frequently include a square - shaped cupola or tower "I-- -: i■ - Zvi "I IIth "WAi Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 65 Chapter 9. Italianate Required Elements i. Shallow roof -pitch (no more than 4:12) ii. Large overhanging eaves and cornices supported by corbels are a defining feature of Italianate architecture Optional Elements (Choose at least 1) iii. Simple hipped roofs iv. Mansard roof forms and center -gable forms (at steep roof pitches) are acceptable as accents B. ROOF DESIGNS _ fl i _ in■ Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 66 Chapter 9. Italianate C. WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS Required Elements i. Windows shall be tall, narrow and double -hung ii. Some windows shall be paired together or grouped in threes Optional Elements (Choose at least 2) iii. Window adornments, of one or more of the following types: 1. The hooded version (curved windows); 2. The bracketed with entablature (rectangular windows); 3. Framed with trim molding (either curved or rectangular) iv. Bay window forms (especially in rowhouse types) v. Faux "quoins" at exterior corners are acceptable r LLE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE 1�. V. r w Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 67 Chapter 9. Italianate D. MATERIALS & COLORS Required Elements i. Exterior walls are brick or shiplap wood siding ii. Decorative details are painted wood Optional Element iii. Bright and expressive paint colors are acceptable options T7 , u GI- Vi TT Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 68 DOUBLIFT117 L1fETED CORNICE ACCENTED WINDOW SHUTTER'. ti _ k ti 1 IMPOSING CORNICE LINE DOMINATED BY STRONG, STONE STAIRS WIDE WINDOW TRIM WITH A KEYSTONE ■ PORCH TOPPED ITH BALUSTRADED BALCONIES PEDIMENTED WINDOWS 3f ~ TRANSOM ABOVE DOOR SQUARE TOWER OR CUPOLA ABOVE THE ROOFLINE MIXED -USE ELEMENTS Required Elements i. Storefront windows are in -line with the wall plane above ii. First floor storefront is differentiated from upper floors by a strong --�;7 iii. Tall narrow storefront windows, featuring a transom iv. Narrow RW columns are located between storefront windows e .r 3 DUPLEX AND TRIPLEX ELEMENTS Required Elements i. All design elements shall be consistent with Italianiate standards ii. Driveway access shall be shared by all units iii. A common sharred walkway / pedestrian pathway shall be provided to access front doors to all units iv. If pedestrian access and driveway access is provided via the same pathway, decorative paving materials shall be employed in lieu of poured concrete or asphalt paving v. All units shall have private outdoor space measuring a minimum of 8 feet x 6 feet; said outdoor space may be provided via an at -grade patio, courtyard, yard, a raised front porch, or an upper -level terrace, including a roof terrace. vi. Garden walls shall be used to delinate private outdoor space provided to individual units, if said outdoor space is provided at -grade 11 �I r.� r�I��� • Arcade Articulation Awning Definitions "A." Arcade. A roofed passageway or lane. A series of arches supported by columns, piers, or pillars, either freestanding or attached to a wall to form a gallery. Articulation. The small parts or portions of a building form that are expressed (materials, color, texture, pattern, modulation, etc.) and come together to define the structure. Attached. Joined to or by a wall, especially by sharing a wall with another building; not freestanding. Awning. A roof -like structure, often made of canvas or plastic, that serves as a shelter, as over a storefront, window, door, or deck. Definitions "B." Balcony. A platform that projects from the wall of a building and is surrounded by a railing, balustrade, or parapet. Balustrade. A row of decorated uprights (known as balusters) supporting a rail along the top. CHAPTER 10. DEFINITIONS lag Balustrade Brackets Canopy Battered. Those forms that slope from a true vertical plane from bottom to top, as in the outside surface of a wall. Board and Batten. A form of sheathing for wood frame buildings consisting of wide boards, usually placed vertically, whose joints are covered by narrow strips of wood over joints or cracks. Brackets. A projection from a vertical surface providing structural or visual support under cornices, balconies, windows, or any other overhanging member. Buffer. A term often applied to landscaped areas separating incompatible land uses. Can also mean an area of a "transitional" land use that lies between two incompatible land uses. Definitions "C." Canopy. A protective roof -like covering, often of canvas, mounted on a frame over a walkway or door or niche; often referred to as an awning. Coping (Cap). A flat cover of stone or brick that protects the top of a wall. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 72 Cornice. The projection at the top of a wall or part of a roof which projects over the side wall. Cornice Corrugated Panels. Panels shaped into folds of parallel and alternating ridges and valleys, either to provide additional strength, or to vary the surface pattern. Courtyard. An extent of open ground partially or completely enclosed by walls or buildings. Cupola. A small dome or tower, IN placed on the roof level. A cupola is used to ventilate and provide natural light for the structure underneath it. Curb Cut. The elimination of a Cupola street curb to enable increased access to crosswalks/sidewalks, entry driveways or parking lots. Definitions "D." Decorative Attic/Gable Vents. A non -venting louver mounted in the top of the gable. Dentil. A band of small, square, toothlike blocks forming part of the Dentil characteristic ornamentation of the Ionic, Corinthian, and Doric orders. Detached. Standing apart from others; separate or disconnected. Dormer Eave Entablature Detail. An element of a building such as trim, moldings, other ornamentation or decorative features. Divided Lite. Individual panes of glass held in place by wood or synthetic material to create a pattern. Dormer. A structure projecting from a sloping roof usually housing a vertical window that is placed in a small gable, or containing a ventilating louver. Downspout. A vertical pipe used to conduct water from a roof drain or gutter to the ground or cistern. Definitions "E." Eave. The projecting lower edge of a roof. Eclectic. Selecting or employing individual elements from a variety of sources, systems, or styles. Elevation. An orthographic view of the vertical features of a building (front, rear, side, interior elevation). Entablature. A horizontal structural element frequently supported by columns or pilasters. It consists of three horizontal layers: the architrave, the cornice and the frieze. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 73 Definitions "F." Fagade. The entire exterior side of a building; especially the architectural front, sometimes distinguished from the other sides by elaboration of architectural or ornamental details. Fagade Faux. A simulation or false representation of something else, as in faux wood or stone. Fenestration. The stylistic arrangement of windows in a building. Gable Roof Hip Roof Focal Point. A building, object, or natural element in a street -scene that stands out and serves as a point of focus, catching and holding the viewer's attention. Front -Gabled Roof. A gabled -roof that faces the road or main entrance. Definitions "G." Gable Roof. A ridge roof that slopes up from only two walls. A gable is the vertical triangular portion of the end of a building from the eaves to the ridge of the roof. Gooseneck Lights. A type of light fixture in which a lamp or lightbulb is attached to a flexible, adjustable shaft to allow the user to position N. Kicker Lintel -.-M A the light source without moving the fixture or item to be illuminated. Definitions "H." Hipped (Hip Roof). A roof that is sloped on all four sides. Definitions "I." Definitions "J." Definitions "K." Knee Brace. A diagonal corner member for bracing the angle between two jointed members; being joined to each other partway along its path serves to stiffen and strengthen the joint. Kicker. A piece of wood that is attached to a formwork member to take the thrust of another member. Definitions "L." Lintel. A horizontal supporting crosspiece over an opening. Definitions W." Maintenance. The work of keeping something in proper condition; upkeep. Mansard. A hip roof, each face of which has a steeper lower part and a shallower upper part. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 74 Mixed Use Mullion and Muntin Porch Mixed -Use. A project allows for horizontal and/or vertical combination of residential and non- residential buildings in a given area. Mullion. The vertical member separating adjacent windowpanes. Muntin. Wood or metal strips separating panels in a window. Definitions "N." Definitions "O." Overhanging Eaves. The projecting overhang at the lower edge of a roof that sheds rainwater. Definitions "P." Parapet. A retaining wall at the edge of a roof, porch, or terrace. Parking. To put or leave (a vehicle) for a time in a certain location. Pediment. The triangular space at the end of a gabled roof, usually low in height compared with the use of its base. Pier. A vertical, non -circular masonry support, more massive than a column. Pilaster. A rectangular column with a capital and base, set into a wall as Rafter Tails an ornamental motif. Pitch. To set at a specified downward slant, i.e. pitch the roof at a steep angle. Porch. A covered platform, usually having a separate roof, at an entrance to a building. An open or enclosed gallery or room attached to the outside of a building; a veranda. Portico. A structure consisting of a roof supported by columns or piers, usually attached to a building as a porch. Proportion. The relationship of size, quantity, or degree between two or more things or parts of something. Definitions "Q." Definitions "R." Rafter Tails. The portion of the rafter that hangs over the wall. Rooflines. Various forms to a roof, such as pitch, ridge, hip, etc., often at different angles. Definitions "S." Scale. The proportion of one object to another. "Pedestrian" or "human" Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 75 Shed Roof Sill scale incorporates building and landscape elements that are modest in size. "Monumental" scale incorporates large or grand building elements. Setback. 1) The recessing of the upper part of the fapade due to the smaller area of the upper floors; 2) The distance a building is recessed from the property line, curb of the street, or the edge of the sidewalk. Shed Roof. A roof shape having only one sloping pane. Shutter. A movable cover for a window used for protection from weather and intruders. Sidewalk. A paved walkway along the side of a street. Sill. The horizontal exterior member at the bottom of a window or door opening, usually sloped away from the bottom of the window or door for drainage of water and overhanging the wall below. Streetscape. The overall appearance of a street or grouping of streets in an area and/or the Trellis Window Sash Muntins (Grids) Glazing [Glass] Sash Frame relationship of buildings to the surrounding sidewalk and streets. Stucco. A durable finish for exterior walls, usually composed of cement, sand, and lime and applied while wet. A fine plaster for interior wall ornamentation, such as moldings. Definitions "T." Townhome. An urban building without side yards, containing one residence on one or more floors. Trellis. A system of horizontal joists supported on posts, often designed to support growing plants. Trim. Any visible woodwork or moldings that cover or protect joints, edges, or ends of another material. Examples: baseboards, cornices, door trim, and window trim. (Figure G-56) Definitions "U." Definitions N." Definitions "W." Window Sash. The moveable part of a window made up of the vertical and horizontal frame that holds the glass. Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 76 Window Types. • Awning - Top hinged. • Bay - Extends beyond the exterior face of the wall. • Bow- Projected window with a curved surface often in the glass itself. • Casement - Side hinged. • Combination - The integration of two or more styles into one unit. • Double Hung - Two sash, vertical sliding. • Hopper -Bottom hinged. • Horizontal sliding - Two or more sashes designed to slide over one another. • Jalousie - Glass slats (Venetian blind principle) with hand crank to open. • Oriel - Windows that project from an upper story, supported by a bracket. • Picture Window - Fixed sash. Definitions "X." Definitions "Y." Definitions "Z." Hopper Bay Windows �OJ Fixed/Picture Casement Single Hung Double Hung Bow Windows Horizontal sliding Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development I Temecula, CA - Jan 25, 2022 DRAFT Page 77 Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: LR18-1684 Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide Proposal: An amendment to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code, to revise the multi -family definition and to establish objective design standards that will apply to any housing development project that requires ministerial approval pursuant to State law or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review but a Specific Plan or Planned Development Overlay (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the proposed Ordinance has been deemed to be exemptfrom further environmental reviewas there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Ordinance revises the multi- family definition so that it applies to any housing project with two or more units and requires that multi -family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards. The proposed Ordinance will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what's currently allowed. Moreover, Government Code Sections 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) provide that an ordinance adopted to implement SB 9 is not a project under CEQA. Staff is recommending that a Notice of Exemption be prepared and be filed in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. PLACE OF HEARING: City of Temecula, Council Chambers, 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA DATE OF HEARING: January 25, 2021 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 PM Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Mondaythrough Fridayfrom 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Sara Toma, City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 506-5185. City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov January 26, 2022 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Long Range Project No. LR18-1684 Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00, for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30- day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Sara Toma at (951) 506-5185. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Enclosures: Check Copies of this letter (2) Self-addressed stamped envelopes (2) Previous Filing Fee Receipt (if applicable) City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Long Range Project No. LR18-1684 Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments Description of Project: Long Range Planning Application No. LR18-1684, an amendment to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to revise the multi -family definition and to establish objective design standards that will apply to any housing development project or mixed used housing project that, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review but a Specific Plan or Planned Development Overlay (PDO) does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project. Project Location: Citywide Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula The Deputy City Manager approved the above described project on January 26, 2022 and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) ❑ Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); ❑ Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); ❑ Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); ❑ Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) ® Categorical Exemption: (Section Number 15061 (b)(3), Class l(d), and Government Code Section 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) ❑ Other: Section 15162 Categorical Exemption Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the proposed Ordinance has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review as there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Ordinance revises the multi -family definition so that it applies to any housing project with two or more units and requires that multi -family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards. These Ordinances will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what's currently allowed. Moreover, Government Code Sections 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) provide that an ordinance adopted to implement SB 9 is not a project under CEQA. Staff is recommending that a Notice of Exemption be prepared and be filed in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. Contact Person/Title: Sara Toma/Associate Planner I Phone Number: (951) 506-5185 Signature: Date: Luke Watson Deputy City Manager STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: December 1, 2021 PREPARED BY: Sara Toma, Associate Planner I PROJECT Long Range Planning Application No. LR18-1684, an amendment to SUMMARY: Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to revise the multi- family definition and to establish objective design standards that will apply to any housing development project or mixed used housing project that, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review but a Specific Plan or PDO does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project. CEQA: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the proposed Ordinance has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review as there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Ordinance revises the multi -family definition so that it applies to any housing project with two or more units and requires that multi -family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards. These Ordinances will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what's currently allowed. Moreover, Government Code Sections 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) provide that an ordinance adopted to implement SB 9 is not a project under CEQA. Staff is recommending that a Notice of Exemption be prepared and be filed in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt (1) a Resolution adopting the Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments and (2) an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula Amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to revise the multi -family definition and require that multi -family and mixed -use developments comply with objective design standards and make the finding that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and Government Code Section 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) (Long -Range Project No. LRI8-1684). BACKGROUND SUMMARY In recent years, the State of California has adopted various housing laws that streamline housing approvals. Specifically, the legislature has taken steps to reduce the amount of subjective discretion jurisdictions have to deny or reduce the density of residential and residential -mixed -use projects. Instead, in certain contexts. In that regard, towns, cities, and counties are developing standards to be in conformance with state laws of streamlining housing approvals while still ensuring quality development projects that can be easily adapted within their city's existing architecture styles. To meet the State's requirements, as well as the City's Housing Element goals and policies of providing adequate housing for all Temecula residents, staff has placed considerable effort to attain State funding to put in place programs that would further streamline housing production while maintaining the City's architectural styles to provide high quality housing developments. In the Fall of 2019, the Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") awarded the City's Community Development Department funding under Senate Bill ("SB") 2 Planning Grants Program in the amount of $310,000 (three hundred ten thousand dollars) for four (4) different planning projects. One of the projects is the Objective Design Standards. The project is funded by the SB 2 Grant. Development of the Objective Design Standards The development of the Objective Design Standards document has been a year -long process of working with internal departments, a consultant, and with the guidance of Planning Commission and City Council infill subcommittees. Staff has done extensive research of existing City documents that pertain to design standards for multi -family housing, such as the city-wide Design Guidelines, Municipal Code, state laws, and any other research items pertaining to the design standards to elevate the quality of the document. Staff worked with the consultant to establish 12 potential architectural styles for the Objective Design Standards (sometimes referred to as "ODS"), and following six styles were ultimately selected: 1. Mission — Spanish Colonial 2. Craftsman 3. Tuscan 4. American Rural 5. East Coast Traditional 6. Italianate Working with these six styles, staff developed objective standards for new multi -family and mixed -use residential developments that would be applicable city-wide for projects requesting approval through a streamlined or ministerial process, or for projects that allow for discretionary review, but for which no other objective design standards exist. Infill Subcommittee Meetings In October 2020, staff and consultant met with the City Council Infill Subcommittee to present the initial 12 architectural styles to obtain guidance on the direction of the project. Staff recommended the inclusion of six architectural styles in the objective design standards, and the Subcommittee agreed with this recommendation and agreed that the styles are consistent with existing city architecture within the city. Since the October 2020 meeting, staff made substantial progress on the project and in September 2021, staff met with the Council Subcommittee again to present the draft document. The Council Subcommittee was delighted with staff s progress and directed staff to establish standards that would lead to higher quality product for multi -family and mixed -use development. In September 2020, staff and consultant met with the Planning Commission Infill Subcommittee to kick-off the project and present staff s initial 12 architectural styles with staff s recommendation of the selected six styles and to obtain guidance on the direction of the project. The Subcommittee supported staff s recommendation and was interested in further development of the standards. In October 2021, staff and consultant presented to the Subcommittee the draft document. RELATIONSHIP TO STATE HOUSING LEGISLATION Housing Accountability Act Originally passed by the California Legislature in 1982, the Housing Accountability Act ("HAA") (Government Code Section 65589.5) is designed to promote and encourage infill development and streamline housing approval processes. Over the intervening years, additional legislation and case law have clarified and refined its implementation and scope. In short, the HAA limits local jurisdictions' (cities and counties) authority by requiring that decision makers base the denial of a conforming housing development project on a very specific set of findings established by state law. At its core, the HAA requires that when a proposed housing development project meets all "applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards and criteria, including [objective] design review standards," the local agency cannot "disapprove the project" or "approve it upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density" unless the agency makes two specific findings: 1. The project would have a specific adverse impact on the public health or safety unless the project were disapproved or developed at a lower density; and 2. There is no feasible method of mitigating or avoiding the impact other than disapproval or reduction in density. Pursuant to the HAA, a "housing development project" includes affordable or market -rate multifamily residential projects, specified mixed -use, and transitional or supportive housing. The various requirements in the HAA apply to all these types of projects, as well as emergency shelters. Although the term is not defined in the statute, objective standards generally include quantifiable requirements (such as building height, size, setbacks, and parking requirements) and other standards that do not require anyone to exercise personal or subjective judgment to determine compliance. 3 Senate Bill ("SB") 35 California State Senate Bill ("SB") 35 (Government Code Section 65913.4), which went into effect on January 1, 2018, was part of a comprehensive bill package aimed at addressing the State's housing shortage and high costs. SB 35 requires cities and counties to streamline review and approval of eligible affordable housing projects through a ministerial approval process, exempting such projects from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). This process does not allow public hearings to consider the merits of the project; rather only design review or public oversight of the development is allowed, which must be objective and strictly focused on assessing compliance with criteria required for streamlined projects as well as objective design review of the project (Section 65913.4(c)(1)). SB 35 required the availability of a streamlined ministerial approval process for multifamily residential developments in jurisdictions that have not yet made sufficient progress toward meeting their regional housing need allocation (RHNA) goal for construction of above -moderate income housing and/or housing for units below 80% area median income (AMI). Currently, surrounding communities, including Temecula, have not met their RHNA goals for affordable housing below 80% AMI. Therefore, at this time, projects providing on -site affordable housing at 80% AMI are eligible for streamlining in City of Temecula provided they meet all the eligibility criteria. Cities are allowed to establish objective design standards for multifamily residential development that apply to State law. Senate Bill (11SB11) 330 California State Senate Bill ("SB") 330 Housing Crisis Act of 2019, which went into effect on January 1, 2020, and will sunset on January 1, 2025. The act amends existing state laws and creates new regulations around the production, preservation, and planning of housing. SB 330 will affect both project planning procedure and community planning outcomes by restricting local rules that limit housing production and further strengthens the Permit Streamlining Act adopted in 1977 (Government Code Section 65920 et seq.) and HAA. The intent of the Housing Crisis Act is to create certainty in the development of housing projects, speeding up the review of these projects, and to create restrictions on new local regulations. SB 330 prohibits cities and counties, including the electorate (by using its local initiative or referendum power), from establishing rules that would effectively: • Change the land use designation or zoning of parcels to a less intensive use or reducing the intensity of the land use within an existing specific or general plan or zoning district below what was allowed under the land use designation as of January 1, 2018 • Impose or enforce a moratorium on housing development within all or a selection of the local agency's jurisdictions • Impose or enforce new design standards established on or after January 1, 2020, that are not objective standards • Establish or implement limits on permit numbers issue by the city or county unless the limit was approved before January 1, 2005, in a "predominantly agricultural County." Senate Bill ("SB") 9 California State Senate Bill ("SB") 9, Ministerial Approval of Duplexes and Urban Lot Split, will go into effect January 1, 2022. SB 9 generally requires cities to ministerially approve, within single-family residential zones, housing developments containing no more than two residential units and parcels maps for urban lot splits. Ministerial approval means that the City cannot impose ad hoc conditions of approval that reflect an exercise of the City's discretion. Further, the City cannot deny an application solely because it "proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance." The City may impose objective zoning standards, subdivision standards, and design standards, provided that the objective standards do not preclude the development of up to two units of at least 800 square feet in floor area. Objective standards, as defined by the law, means standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. ANALYSIS Purpose of the Document The Objective Design Standards provide a clear set of architectural and site design requirements for new multi -family residential, including mixed -use developments. Objective Design Standards are numeric and/or quantifiable and can be measured as opposed to subjective standards, which require interpretation. These standards will ensure development maintains the unique character and quality of design within the City of Temecula. The State of California continues to enact new laws that accelerate housing production by streamlining the approval of housing development at the local level. The Objective Design Standards supplement the development standards of the Temecula Municipal Code and further the goals, policies, and actions of the Temecula General Plan, which encourages an elevated design and fosters an enhanced quality of life through the built environment. Defining Objective vs. Subjective Standards An "objective" standard is one that involves no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criteria available and knowable to both the development applicant and the public official prior to submittal. Many design standards, however, are "subjective" and require personal interpretation of their meaning and application. This interpretation, in turn, can lead to a lengthy project review and approval process. For example, a building height limit of three (3) stories is an objective standard. In comparison, a requirement that a building must blend appropriately with the neighborhood character is a subjective standard. The proposed design standards for multi -family and mixed -use developments are intended to protect Temecula's aesthetic and community character, while complying with State laws that only allow for the imposition of objective standards. Relationship to Development Code and Applicability All developments must comply with the standards of the Temecula Municipal Code Title 17 (Zoning). The draft ordinance amends Title 17 to revise the multi -family residential definition so that it applies to any project with two or more units. The draft ordinance also amends Title 17 to require that certain projects comply with Temecula Objective Design Standard for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments. Ni These standards apply to all multi -family and mixed -use housing developments that, pursuant to State law, require ministerial approval or where the housing development project is subject to discretionary review but a Specific Plan or PDO does not otherwise set forth objective design standards applicable to the project. These standards would apply city-wide. Document Organization The Objective Design Standards are organized to offer an efficient review process for residents, property and business owners, developers and builders, architects and designers, and City staff involved in the review and approval process of multi -family and/or mixed -use development in Temecula. Staff worked closely with the consultant to structure the document in a logical order from how to use these standards, site design standards, to general building design standards. The applicant has six (6) architectural styles to select from, they are as follows: 1. Mission — Spanish Colonial Revival 2. Craftsman 3. Tuscan 4. American Rural 5. East Coast Traditional 6. Italianate To create comprehensive design standards, staff and consultant include standards for residential mixed -use projects. The purpose of the mixed -use residential standard is to allow for a variety of housing types in Temecula that serve all types of households, while also achieving neighborhood goals for an active pedestrian realm along transit corridoes, an attractive street appearance, and minimizing impacts on neighboring properties. Mixed -use residential development is typically a multistory building with commercial uses on a ground floor, and a shared residential entry lobby, and common access areas such as hallways or stairways that lead to individual residential units above or behind the commercial uses. Parking is often shared, whether in a garage or parking lot. In certain instances, if a project is located on a large site, there may be a mixture of residential unit types, for example multifamily apartments and townhomes. In this case, each unit type shall be designed to the specific standards and guidelines of the unit type. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in The Press -Enterprise on November 18, 2021, and posted outside City Hall. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the proposed Ordinance has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review as there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Ordinance revises the multi -family definition so that it applies to any housing project with two or more units and requires that multi -family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards. The proposed Ordinance will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what's currently allowed. Moreover, Government Code Sections 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) provide that an ordinance adopted to implement SB 9 is not a project under CEQA. Staff is recommending that a Notice of Exemption be prepared and be filed in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-XX 2. City Council Ordinance No. 2021-XX - "Exhibit A" 3. Draft City Council Resolution No. 2021-XX 4. Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Development 5. Notice of Public Hearing 6. Notice of Exemption PC RESOLUTION NO.2021-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT (1) A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTI- FAMILY AND MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENTS AND (2) AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE MULTI -FAMILY DEFINITION AND REQUIRE THAT MULTI -FAMILY AND MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENTS COMPLY WITH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS AND MAKE THE FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3) AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65852.21 (J) AND 66411.7(N) (LONG-RANGE PROJECT NO. L1118-1684)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine, and declare that: A. In 2017, the Housing Accountability Act ("HAA") was significantly strengthened through the passage of three bills, Senate Bill ("SB") 167, Assembly Bill ("AB") 678 and AB 1515. These bills were part of a comprehensive group of laws enacted to address California's housing shortage. This signaled a significant shift in the focus of the state's housing policies from planning to production. In 2018, AB 3194 further amended and strengthened the HAA. As clarified by AB 3194, when there are inconsistencies between the General Plan and zoning regulations, the General Plan policies take precedence; and B. On January 1, 2018, SB 35, intended to help address California's housing shortage, went into effect, requiring a streamlined and ministerial review process for multi -family housing projects meeting specific qualifications; and C. On January 1, 2019, AB 2162, intended to help address California's need for supportive and emergency housing, went into effect, requiring a streamlined and ministerial review process for supportive housing meeting specific qualifications; and D. On January 1, 2020, SB 330, intended to create certainty in the development of housing projects, went into effect, speeding up the review of these project, and created restrictions on new local regulations; and E. On January 1, 2022, SB 9 will go into effect, that requires cities to ministerially approve, within single family residential zones, housing developments containing no more than two residential units and parcel maps for urban lot splits; and F. With certain limitations, the above -referenced laws permit the City to impose design standards on housing projects, so long as those standards are objective and involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. Staff developed the "Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments" (referred to as "Objective Design Standards") to establish objective design standards that will apply to any housing development project, pursuant to State law, requires ministerial approval. Staff also identified the need to amend a portion of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to revise the multi- family definition and to require that multi -family and mixed -use developments comply with Objective Design Standards as permitted by State law; and G. The Ordinance was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; and H. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the application and environmental review on December 1, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the city staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; and I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Ordinance hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the General Plan. The proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code do not propose any changes to land use designations. The proposed amendments to Title 17 require that multi -family and mixed -use residential developments comply with objective design standards. These projects will still need to comply with the land use designation of the General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs, and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. Requiring that multi -family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards conforms with Goal 2 of the Design Element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to ensure "design excellence in site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signs," and Policy 2.1 to "establish and consistently apply design standards and guidelines for both residential and non-residential development," and Policy 2.3 to "provide development standards ensuring higher quality building and site design that is well integrated with the infrastructure and circulation systems." 3. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The adoption of objective design standards for multi -family and mixed -use housing developments will ensure quality designs for multi -family and mixed -use residential projects. Requiring that these project comply with objective design standards furthers Goal 2 of the Design Element of the Temecula General Plan which is to ensure "design excellence in site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signs," and with Goal 2 "design excellence in site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signs," and with Policy 2.1 to "establish and consistently apply design standards and guidelines for both residential and non-residential development," and with Policy 2.3 to "provide development standards ensuring higher quality building and site design that is well integrated with the infrastructure and circulation systems. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Ordinance has been deemed to be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Ordinance revises the multi -family definition so that it applies to any housing project with two or more units and requires that multi- family and mixed -use housing developments comply with objective design standards. The proposed Ordinance will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what's currently allowed. Moreover, Government Code Sections 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) provide that an ordinance adopted to implement SB 9 is not a project under CEQA. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council of the City of Temecula adopt a Notice of Exemption for the proposed ordinance. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt (1) a Resolution adopting the Objective Design Standards for Multi -Family and Mixed -Use Developments and (2) an ordinance entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula Amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to revise the multi -family definition and require that multi -family and mixed -use developments comply with objective design standards and make the finding that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and Government Code Sections 65852.210) and 66411.7(n) (Long -Range Project NO. LR18-1684)." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 1" day of December, 2021. � M � �v ""- Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Nut6 Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2021-40 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1 St day of December 2021, by the following vote: AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Ilagel, Turley-Trejo, Watts NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Ruiz, Tel" q Luke Watson Secretary Item No. 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Appoint Member to the Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint a member to the Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (REDI) Commission. BACKGROUND: Effective January 14, 2022, former REDI Commissioner Imelda Huerta resigned her position on the commission due to a schedule change with her new employment creating a vacancy on the seven -member commission. The City Council conducted its annual appointment process for all boards and commissions, including the REDI Commission, at the December 14, 2021 meeting, less than 60 days prior to the current vacancy. Those vacancies were advertised and recruited for utilizing a variety of methods, including but not limited to, the printed newspaper, City website, Channel 3, social media, and community stakeholder platforms. The application period for those vacancies was September 1, 2021 — October 31, 2021. Pursuant to Council policy, since the vacancy on the REDI Commission is occurring within the 60-day period from the previous appointments, it is recommended that the City Council consider the REDI Commission applications submitted during the above -referenced period and appoint a member to the Commission. The term of the appointment will be January 25, 2022 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Redacted Applications Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) Commission Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission (One Vacancy) 1. Tiffany Baker 2. Venus M. Becker 3. Martin Bermudez 4. Jessica Christopher 5. Aamena Darqsha 6. Adam M. Eventov (Appointed December 14, 2021) 7. Eric D. Faulkner 8. Jonathan D. Flietstra 9. Alexandra E. Galeano 10. Sandra S. Greenberg 11. Yuan Hawkes 12. Martha A. Howard 13. Windy L. Johnson 14. Regina D. Knight-Paquet 15. Lyman Legters 16. Victor McDowell 17. Paula A. Minger 18. Farhat Niazi 19. Marty J. Nicholson 20. Stuart Pieklik 21. Seena Trigas City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 25, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Tiffany Baker First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 3 tbaker@theempowermentcenterintl.com Email Address Business: (951) 514-2939 Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. - Licensed Minister, Shepherds Footsteps Temecula, CA - Licensed Hospital Chaplain, Southwest Healthcare System, Wildomar, CA - Certified Gallup Strengths Coach, Gallup - Certified Adult Mediator and Youth Mediator, Community Action Partnership - Professional Life Coach, American Association of Christian Counselors - Parent Educator Certification, Positive Discipline Tiffany Baker Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. The Empowerment Center 27262 Via Industria Temecula, CA 92590 President and Founder 2005 to Present Duties & Responsibilities: - Recognized for positive impact and inclusive programming by Riverside County Board of Supervisors, California State Senate, and California State Assembly. - Provides diversity and equity training to School Districts, Government Agencies, and Large Corporations. - Uses positive psychology and strengths -based training to address cultural challenges and build unity within community organizations and agencies. - Provides Strengths Training and professional development for businesses and agencies throughout Riverside and San Diego county, including Iipay Tribal Nation of Santa Ysabel and many more. - Provides human capacity building programs, liaison support services, and training and resources, working closely with Temecula Valley Unified School District, Murrieta Valley Unified School District, charter schools, youth and families and other agencies in the community. - Provides services and programming for foster youth, working closely with Oak Grove Center, Rancho Damacitas and Aspire Transitional Homes. - Organizes service providers to assess and expand services to at -risk youth, families, and communities. - Motivational counselor to individuals and organizations to set and reach goals. Southwest Healthcare System 36485 Inland Valley Dr, Wildomar, CA 92595 Head Chaplain 2002-2014 Duties and Responsibilities: - Managed and oversaw a team of 20+ chaplains and the chaplaincy program for two hospitals, Inland Valley Hospital and Rancho Springs Medical Center. - Created and implemented a program standard for chaplains of cultural sensitivity and inclusion to ensure patients of diverse backgrounds received equitable treatment and spiritual services. - Provided crisis intervention, including emotional and spiritual support to families, patients, and staff members in the event of death, fatal diagnosis, and other life -changing moments. - Provided counseling services and spiritual guidance to patients and their families, as well as facility staff members, of various faiths and religious belief systems. - Answered questions regarding end -of -life concerns and other spiritual issues while maintaining confidentiality regarding all consultations and counseling sessions. - Conducted and assisted in spiritual rituals, such as the administration of the last rites, prayer with patients, families, and staff members, and sometimes performed spiritual services outside of the hospital including patient funerals. - Conducted regular rounds of the hospital wards where critically ill patients were treated, such as the intensive care unit, and worked on call and on rotational schedules during all shifts, including nights, weekends, and holidays. - Served as a community liaison between the medical facility and local religious organizations and churches, and the medical facility and its patients. Service Experience Tiffany Baker Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. City of Temecula REDI Commission from November 2020 - present Position held: Chairwoman (January 2021 - present) Years of service: 1 County of Riverside Community Action Partnership Positions held: Chairwoman (2018 - present), Vice Chair (2016 - 2018), Commissioner (2012 - present) Years of Service: 9 Mission: Community Action Partnership works with the community, and facilitates opportunities that lead individuals towards self-sufficiency through advocacy, education, wealth building, energy assistance. Details: - Serves as Chairman of a tripartite board that includes Low Income, Private Sector, and Public officials, including representatives from the City of Perris, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Hemet, the University of California Riverside Blum Initiative on Global and Regional Poverty, The United Way of Inland Valley, and the regional chapter of the NAACP. - Created and chaired the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Ad -Hoc Sub Committee to ensure equitable practices are upheld among commissioners, throughout the agency and the delegate community agencies. Hope Collaborative - Child Abuse Prevention Council (CAPC) for Riverside County Position Held: Chairwoman Years of Service: 2 (2013 - 2015) Mission: The mission of the HOPE Collaborative is to promote the safety of children and prevent abuse and neglect in Riverside County. Details: - Served as Chairwoman for the District 3 Temecula- Murrieta Chapter, and directed and led HOPE Collaborative Commissioners to fulfill its mission of child - abuse prevention in Riverside County. - Provided meeting space to bring community organizations and service providers together for the betterment of youth and families. - Recognized as the Child and Family Advocate of the Year by the HOPE Collaborative Commission in 2014, one of the first to receive this award in the region. Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Oak Grove Center Position Held: Program Facilitator, Speaker, and Trainer Years of Service: 7 - Served as speaker and trainer for at -risk youth and the staff that served them. - Provided facility location for community youth programs. Women Organizing Women Position Held: Facilitator and Engaged Community Member Years of Service: 3 - Provided meeting location for the organization. - Served as trainer for inclusive community youth programs. - Facilitated collaborations and partnerships amongst agencies servicing the community. 100 Women Who Care Temecula Valley Position Held: Facility Location Site, Organization Award Reward Recipient Years of Service: 1 - Provided meeting location for the organization. - Facilitated collaborations and partnerships amongst agencies servicing the community. - Recognized as a Quarterly Grant Recipient for the Temecula Valley Chapter. United Way of Inland Valley Position Held: Program Facilitator Years of Service: 8 - Developed and implemented Financial Literacy and Life Skills Program for Transitioning Foster Youth in the Inland Empire. - 3rd consecutive year grant recipient for The Empowerment Center's community programs servicing local youth and families. Temecula Valley Unified School District Position Held: Program and Event Facilitator Years of Service: 6 years - Served as Program Facilitator for on -campus Financial Literacy and Life Skills Programs for at -risk youth. - Provided a safe space and facilitated TVUSD Parents Bullying Forum for district parents, law enforcement, staff, and press to voice their concerns on the bullying issues facing TVUSD. Statement of Interest Tiffany Baker Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. It is my desire to serve for a second term on the REDI commission because I love Temecula. I have enjoyed the opportunity to lead in my hometown. In addition, my 20 years as a Temecula resident have provided a well-rounded experience working with youth and families of all backgrounds throughout the community here in Temecula, and working with local agencies and organizations of the Inland Empire region across the Riverside, Orange, and San Diego Counties. I have used my experience and education to unite diverse groups of residents, stakeholders, community based organizations and legislators for the common good. I have worked closely with agencies in the private sector and the public sector to connect and serve the most vulnerable populations, improve stability, and enlarge their positive impact. To create a community hub for local youth and families, in 2005, 1 founded The Empowerment Center in Temecula, a safe place that supports the development of resiliency and empowers individuals and organizations to overcome challenges through strengths -based solutions. TEC also serves as a hub for non-profit organizations and agencies to form valuable community partnerships that connect and expand their outreach to provide services in the region. We have had the privilege to bring diverse, equitable, and inclusive programming to school districts, group homes, and tribal communities here in the Temecula area and the impact is felt with every life we are blessed to touch. I have a heart for empowering others, making sure all have a fair seat at the table, and ensuring that their voices are heard. Since 2012, 1 have served on the County of Riverside Community Action Partnership (CAP) Commission, helping people move from poverty toward prosperity through economic, social, and policy opportunities. As Chair of this commission since 2018, 1 have been fortunate to bring CAP's programs and services to low-income residents in need in Temecula and Riverside County. In response to the wake of social injustice that has plagued our country, I created and implemented an Ad -Hoc Committee for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) to lead efforts that examined the agency's culture. I recruited members of the community from diverse cultures, backgrounds, and socio-economic statuses to provide resources and work with CAP staff to develop equity recommendations for implementation in all areas affecting both the agency and the community residents we serve. Now, the agency will continue the work of the DEI Committee to expand the recommended diversity strategies in its business model, including agency policies and protocols that directly affect the community. My desire is to bring this same level of care and intentionality to the REDI Commission of the City of Temecula. Not only do I have a knack to develop policy and procedures that improve the overall structure of an organization, but I desire to bring balance and understanding to the commission so that we can create more positive change here in our great city of Temecula. Through my years of service working with diverse populations, I have found that when humanity is a common denominator of a group of people, complex ideas often become clear and achievable. I want to bring this level of understanding to my fellow residents as we work to achieve inclusion and equity throughout our community. I thank you for considering me for a second term on the REDI commission and I look forward to serving my fellow residents in this city that I call home. Value Statement Tiffany Baker Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I personally place a high value on the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion in all aspects of my life. This value serves as the heart-beat for the human -capacity building work that I do. If reappointed, I will continue to uphold and add to these principles by improving the lines of communication for everyone that has a seat at this table. I have a no nonsense, practical, down-to-earth way of dealing with the tough issues that we all need to face. I have the ability to neutralize emotion in difficult situations to build a bridge that connects different viewpoints and creates a forum for understanding. It's my strength to unify and bring diverse groups of people to the table as I help them navigate through their objectives. I can remain neutral in times when polarizing opinions are being expressed. My personal belief is that everyone has the right to be heard but it must be done in a respectful way. As the REDI Chair and Commissioner, I have created safe spaces for people to tell the truth and help all participants to feel seen and heard. Diversity says, "I don't have to agree with you to hear you or respect you." I will uphold these values and ensure that connectedness to our larger mission and teamwork is fostered for the betterment of our diverse city of Temecula. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Colleen Wallace, Mayor of the City of Banning Phone: Email: cwallace@banningca.gov Karlee Meyer, Mayor of the City of Hemet Phone: Email: kmeyer@hemetca.gov Julie Farnbach, Former Board Member on Temecula Valley Unified School District Phone: I Email: Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Tiffany Baker Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question a plies to multiple boards Temecura REDI Commission Recommendation - _Supervisor_Washington.pdf Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials. please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. V I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Tiffany Baker COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE District Office: French Valley 37600 Sky Canyon Drive, #505 Murrieta, CA 92563 (951) 955-1030 — Fax (951) 677-0669 Michelle DeArmond, Chief of Staff E-Mail: D3Email@rivco.org www.SupervisorChuckWashington.com Supervisor Chuck Washington Third District October 30, 2020 Dear Honorable Temecula City Council Members, Riverside Office: 4080 Lemon Street, 51h Floor Riverside, CA. 92501 (951) 955-1030 — Fax (951) 955-2194 Hemet Office: 43950 Acacia Ave, Suite A Hemet, CA. 92544 (951) 955-1030 — Fax: (951) 692-3182 The Riverside County Third District Supervisor's office is pleased to recommend Tiffany Baker for appointment to the City of Temecula's Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission. In 2005, Ms. Baker founded The Empowerment Center, a local nonprofit that has served and empowered thousands of foster youth, low- income residents, and at -risk residents by equipping them to overcome generational struggles, poverty, abuse, low self-esteem and other barriers to success. In 2019, our office presented Ms. Baker with a Riverside County Board of Supervisors Proclamation acknowledging The Empowerment Center's impactful Strengths Discovery Program. This program serves diverse communities — including the lipay Nation of Santa Ysabel's youth and families — with the highest level of cultural competence and understanding. Ms. Baker serves as chair of Community Action Partnership of Riverside County, the largest anti -poverty agency in the nation. Their mission is to use advocacy, education, wealth building and energy assistance to facilitate opportunities toward self-sufficiency. As chair, Ms. Baker effectively leads a tripartite board that ensures low-income communities, the private sector, and the public sector all have a seat at the decision -making table. This position allows her to travel to Sacramento to advocate for policies that improve the lives of our most vulnerable residents. Ms. Baker understands the critical need for collaboration. The Empowerment Center has developed meaningful collaborations with Oak Grove Center, The United Way of the Inland Valleys, school districts and charter schools in order to provide effective interventions for youth and families. Tiffany Baker would be a valuable member of the City of Temecula's Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Committee. She is a community leader with a passion for unity and a talent for bridging the gap between various organizations and government agencies. Thank you for your consideration of this recommendation. Should you have any questions, please contact my office at 951-955-1030. Sincerely, aA,4le'— Chuck Washington Riverside County Third District Supervisor City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 06, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Venus M Becker First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 4 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Real Estate License AS Business Administration Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See Resume Venus M Becker Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Rancho Glen Oaks Homeowners Association - Board Member - 2021 Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Rancho Glen Oaks Homeowners Association - Board Member - 2021 Pauba Valley PTA - PTA Member - 2018-2019 Crowne Hill Elementary School PTA - PTA Member/School Volunteer - 2017-2019 Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I want to serve on the commission because it's my way of serving the community and giving back. I am the first person in my family to be born in this country, and I'm proud of this country. I wanted to serve in the military but due to my health, I wasn't able to. Serving the community in this capacity allows me the opportunity to serve my country - even if it's just a small portion of the country with my local community. As a community member I attend as many city sponsored events with my family as possible- in fact we look forward to the Christmas events every year. I have been actively involved in my children's schools for many years and now I am a member of my HOA board of directors. I am involved because I want to make a positive difference for everyone - it is important to be actively engaged and involved in your community and that is exactly what I continue to do. It's important to set an example for our children and more importantly, to ensure that the environment in which our children are exposed is a positive one. Currently, I am an Account Executive with AtWork Staffing Services where I engage with many members of the community, both businesses and community members. It is my responsibility to ensure that every person I meet with feels that they are heard and their needs/wants are met. I am also a licensed real estate agent with Keller Williams. Once again, I engage with many members of the community to help them with their greatest asset - their home. And lastly, I am currently serving as board member on my board of directors HOA panel. In all three of these roles I am actively engaging with members of the community - all different ages, races, political ideas, and it is my responsibility in every role to ensure that they feel their voices are heard, that they matter, and that they are included. I believe it is my engagement and ability to empathize with people, the ability to put myself in their shoes, that makes me an ideal candidate for serving with the City of Temecula. Value Statement Venus M Becker Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. As a first generation American I am the first person in my family to be born in this country. I understand the importance of inclusion and ensuring that everyone feels that they have a voice. I want to help create the bridge between the city members and Spanish speakers and others of color. Especially in these volatile societal times, it's important that all community members, regardless of color, race, background, sexual orientation, that everyone feels that their voice matters. I know what it's like to have to live with that uncertainty of knowing whether or not your voice matters, so I can relate. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Ryan Gaut/Professional and Personal/Activities Director Briana Gray/Professional/Supervisor Dairia Hidalgo/Professional/Office Coordinator Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question a plies to multiple boards Venus Resume 2021 - _Uadated.docx Resume - If you wish to attach a resume.. please do so here. Venus M Becker Question applies to multiple boards 4429_001.pdf Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. W I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Venus M Becker IM=I PERSONNEL 9/21/21 Re: Reference Letter for Venus Becker To whom it may concern: Venus Becker is an Account Executive with @Work Personnel in Temecula, CA. She is a hard worker and strives to employ as many individuals in the valley with her clients as she can. In the short time she has been with us, she has built strong relationships with her clients, candidates, and team members. She is dependable and reliable and has what it takes to be successful. Venus has a passion to help others and wants to give back to her community. I feel she would be a great addition to any part of the City Council's organization. Since y, Ju Contreras Director of Operations/HR 951-297-3591 x 103 jontreras@atwork.com Venus Becker Phone: Email: Summary Statement Recruiting and sales specialist with over 10 years of experience. Quick thinking, versatile and bilingual professional with management experience ranging from small local teams to nationwide remote teams resulting in knowledge requirements of state laws for several states. Employment History Valuations Recruiter Mueller Reports, Tonawonda, NY • Prospect and lead generate through phone calls and online searches • Contacted and hired appraisers as W2 nationwide (including AK and HI) • Made over 600 cold calls a month • 100% cold calling • Hired 15-20 appraisers a month for bifurcation assignments as W2 employees • Met and exceeded weekly department goals • Remotely maintained a 90% job fill rate average over 10 regions • Managed appraiser progress throughout the hiring process • Responsible for whole state territories Realtor Associate Self Employed, Temecula, CA • Prospect and lead generate through in person meetings, phone calls and open houses • Work closely with buyers and sellers to lead the sales transaction • Negotiate contracts and handle client issues Recruiting Coordinator Welk Resorts Group, Escondido, CA • Remotely maintained a 90% job fill rate average over six locations • Hired 15-20 applicants a month through six regions 0 Screened over 150 applicants a month Sales Associate Welk Resorts Group, Escondido, CA • Sold vacation trial packages to touring guests • Achieved and maintained a 10% close rate • Reached top commission bonus levels as #2 sales agent Post Tour Ambassador Welk Resort Group Inc, San Marcos, CA • Developed, implemented and hosted three live webinars for owner training • Launched a customized digital platform to obtain feedback from touring guests maintaining an 85% guest satisfaction rating • Advocated for the company in social media spaces engaging in dialogue with guests, owners and the public • Responsible for maintaining a positive public image for the brand Marketing Team Lead Hilton Grand Vacations Club, Los Angeles, CA • Opened HGVCs first IPC marketing location in Los Angeles • Managed a team of 5 team members • Sold vacation packages for HGVC properties • Identified new market segment opportunities • Created and implemented strategies to increase sales within market segments Marketing Team Lead Grand Pacific Resorts Inc, Carlsbad, CA • Opened two hotel marketing locations in San Diego County • Recruited for new locations • Managed a marketing staff of 11 intermittently • Sold vacation packages for HGVC property MarBrisa • Identified new market segment opportunities • Created and implemented strategies to increase sales within market segments City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 09, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Martin First Name Home Address Temecula City Bermudez Middle Initial Last Name Suite or Apt CA 92591 State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap * W District 4 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Bachelor's Degree in English Literature from California State University, Northridge. (See Resume) Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. I have been employed as a Senior Home Loan Advisor for the past 5 years. (See Resume) Martin Bermudez Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. No Board or Commission Service History. I have lived in Temecula and raised my family here since December of 2005. (See Resume) Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. (See Resume) Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I wish to serve on this Commission because I genuinely care about the health, well-being and prosperity of all Temecula's Citizens. I have served thousands of families over the years and helped bring long- lasting wealth into their lives through Home Ownership. I am grateful to Temecula for the opportunities and helping me build a great business and create a great home for my beloved Family. I have been a very active participant, contributor, patron and cheerleader for great local organizations like the Temecula Chamber of Commerce, Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors (SRCAR), Safe Alternatives For Everyone, National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals (NAHREP), National Association of Real Estate Brokers and Realtists (NAREB), Asian Real Estate Association (AREAA). It's a great time in my life to serve and be a guardian of Temecula's unique heritage, quality of life and inclusiveness. My goal is for Temecula to become the Greatest City in America and I have a lot to offer our Community so that we can continue to be a Model City not only now but for generations to come. Thank you! Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I would uphold these values by living these values everyday, in both my personal and business dealings. This is not difficult when you truly and deeply respect your fellow men & women and wish only the very best for them and their families. Diversity and Inclusion are also easy to uphold when you reflect on the richness that diverse cultures bring to our area and amazing business opportunities that deliver on the promise of prosperity for all. A sense of Mission is important. I do not underestimate the importance of these board positions. Public Services is a Noble Calling and I am truly in awe of those that serve our Community everyday. References Martin Bermudez Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): John Schwab, CEO, Brad Smith, Financial Advisor, Tommy Dutcher, Title Company Executive, Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Martin_ Bermudez_ Magnum Opus _2021.pdf Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Martin Bermudez Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. V I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Martin Bermudez Martin Bermudez Temecula CA 92591 Experienced Mortgage Sales and Management Professional well versed in Building Lasting Relationships with Clients, Business Partners & Peer Groups in a Production Environment. My Goal is to use my Experience and Education to Achieve the Highest Quality of Leadership possible, bringing Satisfaction and Mutual Benefits to my Employer, Myself and the Customers we serve. Career Experience Bank of the West, Newport Beach Mortgage Banker 02/20 — Present • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in a Both a High Net -Worth Private Client & Emerging Markets Environment. • Build -out, Recruitment, Hiring and Training of Mortgage Bankers at my Mortgage -Only Branch location. • Top -Producer Level Personal Production in a 100% Self -Sourced Non -Network Market. • Emerging Markets Product Development and Implementation in Urban, Suburban and Rural Markets Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Temecula 02/19 — 01/20 Senior Home Mortgage Consultant • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets at the Top -Producer Level. (Jumbo/FHANA/USDA/Conventional) • Consumer Direct Mortgage Production in Distributed Retail environment specializing in a Realtor Partnership Business Model. Guaranteed Rate, Temecula 11/18 — 02/19 Loan OfficerNP of Mortgage Lending • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets (Jumbo/FHANA/USDA/Conventional) at the Top -Producer Level with special emphasis on Self -Sourced Purchase Business. Stearns Lending, Temecula 04/18 — 10/18 Branch Manager • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets (Jumbo/FHANA/USDA/Conventional) at the Top -Producer Level with special emphasis on Self -Sourced Purchase Business. • Comprehensive Sales Management. Recruitment & Training. Brand -Building in Expansion Markets. RPM Mortgage Inc., Corona 09/16 — 04/18 Branch Manager • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets (Jumbo/FHANA/Conventional) at the Top -Producer Level with special emphasis on Self -Sourced Purchase Business. • Comprehensive Sales Management. Recruitment & Training. Brand -Building in Expansion Markets. Academy Mortgage Corporation, Temecula 12/14 — 08/16 Branch Manager • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets (Jumbo/FHANA/USDA/Conventional) at the Top -Producer Level with special emphasis on Self -Sourced Purchase Business. • Comprehensive Sales, Underwriting, and Operations Management. Recruitment. Brand -Building. P&L Governance. New Penn Financial, San Diego 09/14 —12/14 Senior Loan Consultant • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets (Jumbo/FHANA/Conventional) at the Top - Producer Level with special emphasis on Self -Sourced Purchase Business. New American Funding, San Diego 02/14 — 09/14 Senior Loan Consultant • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets (Jumbo/FHANA/USDA/Conventional) at the Top -Producer Level with special emphasis on Self -Sourced Purchase Business. Citibank, San Diego 07/13 — 02/14 Senior Home Mortgage Consultant • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets (Jumbo/FHA/VA/Conventional) with special emphasis on Self -Sourced Business within the Retail Partnership Channel. PNC Bank, San Diego 01/13 — 07/13 Senior Loan Officer • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in Diverse Markets with special emphasis on Self -Sourced Business HSBC Bank USA, San Diego 02/12 — 01/13 Premium Mortgage Consultant • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans with special emphasis on Jumbo Purchase Loans and Self -Sourced Business in a High Net -Worth Client environment JPMorgan Chase, Carlsbad 01/09 — 03/10 Senior Loan Officer • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans at the Top Producer Level in both a high -volume Private Client Market as well as Emerging Markets Environment. Bank of the West, San Diego 09/07— 01/09 Senior Home Mortgage Consultant. • Origination of Purchase & Refinance loans in a High Net -Worth Private Client & Emerging Markets Environment. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, San Diego 02/07 —09/07 Sales Mana eg_r. • Comprehensive Sales Team Management. Recruitment, Hiring & Training. • Excellence in Loan Quality, High -Volume Loan Origination at the Top -Producer Level. Downey Savings, San Diego 12/05 —02/07 Senior Loan Officer. • Comprehensive Sales Team Management. • Excellence in Loan Quality, High -Volume Loan Origination at the Top -Producer Level. US Bank, Santa Monica 02/04 —09/04 Sales Manager. • Comprehensive Sales Team Management. • Excellence in Loan Quality, High -Volume Loan Origination at the Top -Producer Level. Countrywide Home Loans, Los Angeles 03/02 —07/03 Branch Manager. • Comprehensive Sales Team Management. • Excellence in Loan Quality, High -Volume Loan Origination at the Top -Producer Level. Broadway Federal Savings, Los Angeles 10/95 —03/02 Chief Lending Officer. • Comprehensive Loan Sales & Operations Team Management. • Recruitment, Hiring & Training of Sales & Fulfillment Staff throughout Los Angeles & Orange Counties • Writing of Master Agreements, Portfolio Management, Secondary Market, Bulk Sales. • Underwriting and Quality Control of Residential Mortgage Loans. • Excellence in Loan Quality, High -Volume Loan Origination at the Top -Producer Level. Home Savings of America, Los Angeles 09/94 —09/95 Loan Officer. • Origination of Purchase & Refinance Mortgage Loans in a high -volume environment. • Wide Range of Business Development Activities and Community Outreach Activities. • Broad -based Marketing to Professional Groups, Non -Profit Organizations and Consumer Direct. • Excellence in Loan Quality, High -Volume Loan Origination at the Top -Producer Level. Education School of Arts and Humanities, English Language and Literature California State University, Northridge Liberal Studies Our Lady, Queen of Angels Seminary College Preparatory Skills/Languages Fluent English and Spanish Virtuoso Sales Trainer, Seminar Presenter and Public Speaker. Microsoft Office Applications and Most Mortgage -Specific Applications including Encompass, Point, Unifi aka HALO, LoanSoft, PC Lender, IHM, LQB & Others City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 31, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Jessica First Name Home Address Temecula City Christopher Middle Initial Last Name Suite or Apt CA 92591 State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap * W District 4 jzc@value-n-sales.com Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See Resume Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See Resume Jessica Christopher Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See Resume Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See Resume Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I have been attending city council meetings and feel I can bring some need balance to the REDI committee. I am 11th generation American; my family was here before this country was a country. I have within my family, Hispanic, Filipina, Native Americans from the Choctaw and Cherokee Nations, my extended family includes African Americans. In the 20 years my husband served In the US Navy as an active duty enlisted submariner, we had the chance to live in various diversified communities around the U. S. I have lived in the south, I know what Red Lining looks like, I have seen racism up close and personal, and I have fought racism effectively in my lifetime. I believe that what some would say are disadvantages are a gift, and despite growing up with those so-called disadvantages, I have, as Marten Luther King would say, Overcome. Like Martin Luther King, I believe that people should be judged by their character, not their skin color. Our founding fathers strived to create a system of checks and balances. I believe I can add some balance to the REDI committee. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I would lead by example with kindness and forgiveness. I think every resident of Temecula should have the same opportunities for success and happiness regardless of race, gender, or political beliefs. I was a city employee when I worked for the Kingsland Police department many years ago. I know what it means to be a public servant. I would bring to the REDI commission the same ethics I have for every position I have been trusted to hold. I believe everyone has the right to be treated equally and fairly. References Jessica Christopher Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Kevin Bussdieker, Business owner"Susan kevinb@ace-inspectons.com Mary Augusta, Business owner, Pifari, Business owner, susan@foresightinsurance.net Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards JESSSICA Z CHRISTOPHER RESUME. City of Temecula.pdf Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recomdation.pdf Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Jessica Christopher Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. V I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Jessica Christopher JESSICA CHRISTOPHER - Certified Residential Appraiser/Realtor Temecula, CA 92591 Phone Cell JZC@JZCAppraisals.com Professional Profile Licensed trainee appraiser in 08/05 and Certified Residential in 07/11 working as a fee appraiser since being certified, licensed Real Estate Agent since 07/09. Professional Experience • Grievance/Pro Standards Committee for SRCAR 2012-2021 • Added to Old Republic online review panel 2017 • Added to VA panel in 2017 • Added to REL's High -end appraisal panel 2014 • Complex Single Family Residential • Certified by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) • Single Family Residential / Manufactured • Condominium//Townhomes Appraisals Career Highlights • Appraiser, JZC Appraisals 05/10-Present • Appraiser, Lynch Associates 04/12-5/13 • Appraiser, So Cal Appraisals 02/08-05/10 • Appraiser, Advanced Real Estate Appraisal 08/05-02/08 Professional Associations • Certified Residential Specialist • CaCAP, California Coalition of Appraisal Professionals • NAA, National Association of Appraisers • Southwest Board of Realtors, Pro Standards Member Volunteer Activities • Veterans of Foreign Wars, Life Member • Habitat for Humanity • Appraised Real Estate Pro Bono for Habitat for Humanity Southwest • Donated over $3000 and 400 hours to support the Veterans of Foreign Wars Motorcycle Clubs Food Box and Veterans Home inspection programs Education Associate of Science degree in Real Estate from Mount San Jacinto College. Quality education for continuing education. The most recent continuing education includes; • Real Estate Laws 02/05/2021 • Cost Approach Appraisals 03/08/2021 • 2020-2021 National USPAP Course 01/24/2020 • Accredited Green Appraiser Build It Green 10/09/2019 • Valuation Resources for Solar Photovoltaic Systems 06/10/2019 • Persistent Appraisal Failures the Hagar Institute 06/05/2019 • Valuation Expo, Allterra 2018 Appraisal Policy and Procedures 5/2018 • Affiliated Appraiser Workshops USPAP 8/2017 (2018-2019 USPAP) • Affiliated Appraiser Workshops Federal & California State Laws 9/27/2018 • US Department of Housing and Urban Development, FHA Appraisal 09/2017 • Valuation Expo, Allterra Group Keynote / Fraud / Regulator Update 07/2016 • Valuation Expo, Allterra USPAP 06/2014 • Valuation Expo, Allterra Group Visionaries / Regulatory Compliance 06/2014 Additional education provided by request. October 31, 2021 Re: Recommendation for Jessica Christopher Temecula Mayor and City Council: I have had the pleasure of working with Jessica Christopher for around 20 years in the Real Estate industry. Throughout the course of business, I have had the opportunity to observe Jessica's behavior and judgment. On all occasions I have found Jessica to be fair and honest. She is an upstanding role model and exhibits the qualities of a just leader. She is generous with her time and resources. She is willing to help other real estate appraisers even when they compete for work with the same companies. She is highly professional and is one of the most knowledgeable people I know. It is a pleasure to know Jessica and I would recommend her for any position, committee or board with the City of Temecula. Sincerely, Mary Augusta Carlsbad, Ca 92010 Ph # Certified Real Estate Appraiser License # AR027148 City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 08, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Aamena Darqsha First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap PF District 1 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Bachelor's in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. None. I was a fulltime homemaker. Aamena Darqsha Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. I have never worked in USA Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. I have volunteered Non profits at my home country . I was a techinical girl who taught underprivileged students. One of the nonprofits that I work very closely is Let Us serve foundation Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. lam an immigrant .United states is the land of opportunities. No matter what,where we are from it has a fair system where people from different ethnic backgrounds gets the opportunity at any given point of time . I beleive my flexibility, honesty and dedication with a patient behaviour makes me standout. I believe this role is what lam looking to start my professional career while being close to my two precious kids. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I come from a country of multiple Religions & race . AND I live in a country of immigrants. I always wanted to work in a division where I can proudly standout to show the beauty of this country. I coudnot resist myself from applying this postion. My dedication to my efforts made me realize how I can be a assert to the city. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Mahammad Hessan obili(senior ro ram Manager)-Husnu Pari--Sonal Rana(software engineer) - Self -Selection Options Aamena Darqsha Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. PF I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Aamena Darqsha City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 18, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Adam M Eventov First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92591 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 4 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Community Services Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Bachelor's of Science, Psychology, University of Southern California Master's of Arts, Communications - Journalism, Cal State Fulerton Tribal Administration Certificated Program, Drucker School of Management, Claremont College Group/San Manuel Adam M Eventov Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Nov. 1, 2019 to Present: SoCalGas Public Affairs Manager February 1, 2017 to November 1, 2019: San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Intergovernmental Affairs Manager June 16, 2010 to February 1, 2017: Wellsaid! Communications, owner, principal Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. None Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Mt. San Jacinto College Foundation Board of Directors: Board member, June 2020 to present; Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce: Board Member, February 2020 to present, Shop Local Committee Chairman, REDI Committee founding member; Murrieta-Temecula Group, member; Economic Development Coalition of Southwest Riverside County, member; Beaumont Chamber of Commerce: Board Member, March 2020 to present; Menifee Valley Chamber of Commerce: Secretary and Board member, 2014-February 2017; Academy for Grass Roots Organizations: Board Member, 2010-2012; Menifee Rotary Club, member, July 2021 to present; Hemet -San Jacinto Multicultural Network, member; Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. For the past 22 years, I have grown a deep understanding of our City and our region from my work as a journalist, public relations professional, tribal government affairs manager and public affairs manager for SoCalGas. In that time, I have seen the successes and failures of programs and events held throughout Riverside and San Bernardino counties and can bring a broad perspective to the Commission as we produce programs and events that enrich the lives of our residents. In my various roles, I have attended and presented issues and land use projects to the City of Temecula and city and county governments throughout the region. Some of these projects include the Villages of Lakeview 8,500-home development, the Terramor development in Temescal Valley, the Temecula Gateway Project and 2 gigawatts of commercial solar projects. As a 23-year resident and parent of two now grown children, I have attended city concerts, chalk festivals, car shows, charity fundraisers and holiday parades as both a spectator and participant through Cub Scouts and Girl Scouts clubs, and various sports and dance teams. Value Statement Adam M Eventov Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. As a board member of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, it has been my privilege to be a founding member of the Chamber's Race Equity Diversity and Inclusion Committee. I am a firm believer in the Committee's mission (and helped write the mission and goals of the groups) as well as the mission and goals of the City's REDI Commission. I am fortunate to work for Sempra Energy and SoCalGas and share its belief that supporting the advancement of underserved communities strengthens our community and, in the case of SoCalGas, our company. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Al Rubio, Chairman, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, Al Rubio ARubio@DCHUSA.com; Chuck Washington, Riverside County Supervisor, c.washington@rivco.org[ Jackie Steed, REDI Commissioner, Secretary of the Temecula Valley Chamber Board of Directors, Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Adam M Eventov Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Adam Eventov BIO.docx Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. Ff I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Adam M Eventov BIO for Adam Eventov Adam Eventov is a public affairs manager for SoCalGas. Before recently joining the company, Adam served as Government Affairs Manager for the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, where he worked with Tribal leadership and staff on a variety of Indian, environmental, gaming and local government affairs issues. Prior to his time with the Tribe, Adam worked as a public relations consultant, helping to secure the development of more than $4 billion and more than 2 gigawatts of solar energy, natural gas and home development projects. He holds a master's degree in journalism and was a business reporter and editor for several Inland Empire newspapers covering economic development, energy, transportation, and real estate development. Adam lives in Temecula with his wife Kristen. Their son Ian is a senior at Temecula Valley High School and their daughter is a senior at UC Santa Barbara. City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 02, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Eric D Faulkner First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 2 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Bachelor of Science in Health Sciences Master of Sciences in Health Administration Certification in Diversity, Inclusion and Equity in the Workplace from University of Southern Florida Business College Eric D Faulkner Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Health Administrator VA San Diego Healthcare System 2016 - 2017 VA Veteran Experience Office, Management Analyst 2017 - 2021 Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Temecula REDI Commission Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. View Church, Board of Directors Vice Chair, 3 years Temecula Chamber Commerce, 1 year Big Brothers/Big Sisters, Volunteer Mentor, 6 months Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I would like to serve on this commission to continue to move and lead Temecula into a diverse/inclusive environment. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. If selected I would provide direction and leadership that unites the communities of Temecula towards a city where all are valued. I would provide sound decision making that is unbiased and free of any political pressure References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Danny Youn , Riverside Sheriff Department, odd Hlavac, Retired Navy and Registered Nurse, i" Antonio Allen, Command Master Chief United States Navy, - Eric D Faulkner Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards EricBio2.doc Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. W I Agree Eric D Faulkner Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Eric D Faulkner Master Chief (ret) Eric Faulkner, a native of Memphis TN, enlisted in the Navy July 1987, attending Boot Camp at RTC, Great Lakes, IL. He retired after 27 years of honorable and faithful service to his country and to his Navy in 2014. Tours included: Naval Hospital Charleston, SC: served as General Duty Corpsman and Leading Petty Officer. (El-E4) Naval Hospital Yokosuka, JA: served as a Physical Therapy Technician. (E5) Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, CA: served as a Physical Therapy Technician and Leading Petty Office. (E5 to E6) 1st Marine Division, Camp Pendleton, CA: served as Independent Duty Corpsman, Leading Chief and Senior Medical Department Representative. (E6 to E8) Naval Medical Center San Diego, CA: served as Independent Duty Corpsman and LCPO for the Emergency Department, SEL for Director of Medical Services, SEL for Directorate of Nursing Services, SEL Expeditionary Medical Facility Kuwait and Deputy Command Master Chief. (E8-E9) Ist Marine Logistics Group, Camp Pendleton, CA: served as the Command Master Chief for 1st Medical Battalion and Acting Command Master Chief for 1st Marine Logistics Group. Upon completion of this tour was selected as a Command Master Chief (9580). Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron Eight (Eightballers) Coronado, CA: served as CMDCM for the Motivated Eightballers. (9580) Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, CA: served as CMDCM and lead the relocation of hospital. (9580) Relationship Manager for Kaplan University developing degree programs for service members giving maximum credit for military experience and training. Healthcare Administrator for the VA San Diego Healthcare Systems Escondido Community Based Outpatient Clinic. Management Analyst with the Veterans Administrations Veterans Experience Office focused on improving the veterans experience with healthcare, benefits and cemetery support services to veterans. Vice Chair Board of Directors View Church. (3 years) City of Temecula Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commissioner working to ensure that programs and policies across the city are created to ensure that all subsets of population demographics are considered when developing programs across the city. (2 months) Mentor to young middle and high school aged young men. (8 years +) Master Chief(ret) Faulkner is married to the beautiful Cassandra Faulkner and they have two amazing adults, Stephan and Jazmyn. He earned his Enlisted Fleet Marine Force, Enlisted Aviation Warfare Specialist, and numerous personal awards. He has completed his Bachelor of Science in Health Sciences and Master of Science in Health Administration from Trident University International City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 01, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Jonathan D Flietstra First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 3 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. CSU Long Beach— BS in Sports Psychology & Coaching (2006-2010) Fuller Theological Seminary — Masters in Divinity (2013-2016) Jonathan D Flietstra Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Professional Golfers Career College, Director of Admissions (2018-Present). Emmanuel Reformed Church, Inner City Pastor (2015-2018). Parks & Rec., Program Manager, City of Bellflower (2003-2007) Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. City of Bellflower Youth/Adult Sports coordinator, (2007-2008). Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Secretary/Treasurer of the Riverside County Basketball Officials Association (2020-Present). Being Human Community Organizer, Temecula/MeetUp App (2018-Present). Above the Rim board Member, Paramount, Community Basketball League (2016-2018). The Compton Initiative Team Leader, Compton, (2016-2018). Crazy-4-Sports founder/Creator, community youth athletics, Lakewood (2012-2014). Laurel Pines Campground Director of Staff, Big Bear, (2006-2010). Statement of Interest Jonathan D Flietstra Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. My wife and I moved here from the Compton/Paramount area 3 years ago. I am just starting to experiment/inquire with getting involved with the city of Temecula. As a white male growing up in the South LA area, though I was surely a benefactor of the systematic privileges I was born into, many of the settings I would find myself located in were ones where I was the minority. For example, I grew up playing basketball and was usually the only white one on the teams I would participate. When I played soccer, the same reality would take place. In these examples, I would find myself invited into the African American and Mexican-American/Latino cultures. This was part of my "normal." Inside of these other cultures was my home away from home. Once we were settled in here in Temecula, I noticed something in my first few weeks here: for the first time in my life, I was living in a city where I was not the minority. I was clearly the majority and would often realize that instead of being the only white one in a room, we were all white. When I lived in Paramount/Bellflower/Compton, even though (as a white male) I am a holder of certain privileges in society, most places I went, I was the lone white person in the building. There was a respect and honor I felt I owed to the host culture, when I was "let in" to these other communities. Once I was welcomed, I felt like it was my duty to bring the journeys, narratives, and stories of oppression from these marginalized communities back to the White community I was a part of— often the holders of positions of power. I felt it was also my duty to shine a spotlight on and share the incredibly wonderful aspects of these groups as well. I feel the desire to be not only an ally, but an advocate for these stories to be heard, To have platforms to share, To create space for others to listen. For ten years, I was a pastor who struggled with the idea of a "god" who we waited on to act. Maybe we are the ones to act? What was I supposed to do with the idea of a god who loved people and acted on their behalf less than myself. Wasn't god supposed to love all people? All nations? All stories? Why was I continually seeing the same systems of oppression in place over certain groups and "god" not intervening? I left my role as clergy/pastor, pressed the reset button, and started a once a month group called "Being Human." You can find out more on the MeetUp App. Here, we try to connect on the common theme of humanity. We gather, eat, and discuss various topics once a month. I believe these kind of conversation lay the groundwork for empathy. Empathy is needed if I want to treat my neighbor better. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. See above response. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Mike DeMaster, Executive Director, Emmanuel Church, ndrew Camacho, City of Lakewood Operations, Jed Manimtim, Executive Pastor, jmanimtim@sunridgechurch.org Matt Arellano, President RCBOA, Self -Selection Options Jonathan D Flietstra Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. W I Agree Jonathan D Flietstra Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Jonathan D Flietstra r� t City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 31, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Alexandra E Galeano First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92591 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 5 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Please see resume. Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Please see resume. Alexandra E Galeano Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. I currently do not have any experience to add to this section. Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Temecula Elementary PTA, President, position being held for 2021-2022 school year. Additionally, please see resume. Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. Thank you for taking the time to read this. I have been a Temecula resident for the past 8 years. Temecula is my home, where my children are growing up, and where my family's roots are placed. Just like the roots of a tree or a plant, the soil of our city needs time and attention to help it flourish. I would have no higher honor than to serve as a part of the vessel that supports our city in this endeavor. What I may lack in previous government experience, I make up for in determination, grit, and compassion for the place that we reside in. In the last year, I have had more time to interact with members of the city council and attend city council meetings. I attended several city council meetings this year, most notably with my daughter. We spoke on behalf of support for the REDI commission and keeping its original mission and name. From my time spent at the city council meetings, I realized the importance of engaging, serving, and speaking in a capacity that directly and positively impacts the people of our community. I would be honored to do that from a commissioner's standpoint. Value Statement Alexandra E Galeano Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. As a Mexican -American woman, mother, and person with differing abilities, I am aware of and understand firsthand the importance of each of those principles. I practice inclusion, embrace diversity, and search for solutions to obtain equity daily without hesitation. I understand being marginalized because of the color of my skin, the socio-economic background I come from, and the importance of inclusion. Currently, I serve as a PTA President to one of the most diverse schools in cultures, races, and socio-economic backgrounds in Temecula. My frame of mind is constantly centered around the significance of diversity and how as a community we are so much stronger when we are aware of our differences as well as embracing them. Having that awareness, allows opportunities to find solutions that uplift our community, including the most vulnerable members. Additionally, I am employed as a Life Coach for Oak Grove Center, a non-profit that provides community -based services to foster and probation youth in Riverside county. My experience in both roles provides me the opportunities daily to practice these principles. I will implement them every chance I get as a commissioner. As a person with differing abilities, I am 30% deaf in my left ear. After the time I have spent at city council meetings, I reached out to Council -member Stewart to forward an idea to the REDI commission about adding closed -captioning to city council meetings. The implementation of closed captioning would benefit many in our community who manage the same issue as me. On a separate occasion, I reached out to Council -member Schwank about a marketing picture used on social media for the recent Halloween event put on by the city. I noticed that people of color and differing abilities were missing from the marketing. Council -member Schwank assured me that the message would be passed along to take notice in the future. The person I am and the experiences I have had contribute to these values placed so highly by the city of Temecula. If placed in an official capacity, I would continue to support these principles. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Stephen Liapis, Housing Navigator, Allison Donahue -Beggs, LCSW, Courtney Enriquez, Registered Nurse, - Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Alexandra E Galeano Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards GaleanoAResume.pdf Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Galeano_ Recommendation_Letter.pdf Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. W I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Alexandra E Galeano October 1, 2021 Letter of Recommendation for Alexandra Galeano to be appointed to the REDI (Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion) Commission Dear City Council Members: 1 am honored to write a letter of recommendation for Alexandra Galeano as a REDI Commission member. I am a 23-year resident of Temecula and have raised my two sons here along with my husband. My youngest son is a Junior at Great Oak High School. I am a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and have worked for Riverside County Department of Public Social Services for 22 years. I have known Mrs. Galeano for over four years and can confidently say she is a person of impeccable character. Mrs. Galeano is an excellent candidate for the REDI Commission as she has worked tirelessly to better her community. Mrs. Galeano has first-hand experience of racial issues here in Temecula. She also recently graduated from Cal State San Marcos with a BA in Social Sciences with a focus in Sociology, Women and Gender Studies, and Political Science. Mrs. Galeano has two Associate Degrees from MSJC (A.A. in Liberal Arts in Social and Behavioral Sciences and A.A. in Arts, Humanities, and Communications). Alexandra Galeano has been a resident of Temecula for eight years and has three beautiful children. Her oldest daughter recently spoke in front of the City Council in support of the REDI Commission (as did Mrs. Galeano herself). Her daughter is a 5th grader (who recently interviewed for Student Council) and her son is a V grader. Her youngest will be going into Kindergarten next year. Mrs. Galeano has worked in customer service, has worked with children, and currently works for the Oak Grove Center. Mrs. Galeano is dedicated to serving her community and aid in our city's efforts for developing an inclusive environment for all of our community members. One characteristic that stands out is Mrs. Galeano's positivity and desire to be solution -focused. Mrs. Galeano does not spend time focusing on the negatives, but works to see the good in everyone and find solutions for the good of the entire group. Mrs. Galeano does not shy away from difficult situations and makes her voice heard in a respectful and effective manner. I recommend Mrs. Alexandra Galeano for the REDI Commission without hesitation. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at Sincerely, Allison Donahoe -Beggs, LCSW Temecula, CA 92592 N M V) GaleanoResume * d o File Edit View Insert Format Tools Add-ons Help Last edit was seconds ago hr% e-ii Cy AV 100% - Normal text - Georgia - — 11 + B j U A A$' c--� +p Q - _ - T= "' 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Alexandra Galeano Temecula, CA Empathetic, analytical, and collaborative university graduate with a Social Sciences degree. Seeking a position on the City of Temecula's REDI or Community Services commission to serve in a position with a high social impact and civic involvement. EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts in Social Sciences, California State University San Marcos - San Marcos, CA Study emphasis included: Political Science, Sociology, and Women and Gender Studies. • Developed a marketing plan to create awareness of the campus food pantry and cultivate recipes for students who were food insecure. • Graduated Fall 2020 • Dean's List Spring 2020 • Commencement Speaker for the College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Science, Class Of 2021 8 Share n Associate of Arts Degrees, Mt. San Jacinto College - Menifee, CA • A.A. in Liberal Arts in Social and Behavioral Sciences Q > City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 31, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Sandra S Greenberg First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 2 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Bachelor of Science with major in Special Education from Arizona State University State certified Insurance Agent Sandra S Greenberg Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Worked as a tutor to underprivileged Spanish speaking children who were having trouble acclimating to public schools in San Diego Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. No previous service of this nature. Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Volunteered for various political candidates and was a poll watcher. In addition, I oversaw signature verification at Board of Elections Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. As a new resident of Temecula, I wish to hit the ground running in what I perceive as a very vibrant and welcoming community. I've been researching hiking trails and dog centered activities and must confess I've had trouble finding them. There is an abundance of information on wineries and casinos, but a lack of concise information on outdoor activities. I'd like to formulate a plan in conjunction with existing apps, to familiarize myself with existing parks and add make that information more accessible. Having taught school for six years, then raised four children, planning events was something that became second nature to me. I really enjoy it and I'm excellent at it. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. Parks and community events are the perfect venues to bring people together from all different backgrounds. I would research the various groups of Temecula residents in order to understand their needs. Different heritage festivities could be planned to demonstrate the rich cultural diversification that makes up Temecula. Inclusivity of people from all different backgrounds would be something I would strive for and accomplish. Sandra S Greenberg References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Gwen Lampman Friend Diane Hickman Tony Krvaric tkrvaric�tx krvariccapital.com Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Sandra S Greenberg Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. V I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Sandra S Greenberg City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 31, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Yuan Hawkes First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92591 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 5 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Ph.D. Molecular Biology, University of Illinois at Chicago; B.S. Biology, Wuhan University (See Resume) Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. 2019-present, Springs Charter School, 27740 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, CA 92590, Board Director, overseeing and approving the sound fiscal and operational management of the school. (See Resume) Yuan Hawkes Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. NONE Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. 2018-present, President, Homeowners Association; 2020-21, VP membership, Optimal Speakers Toastmasters; 2015-16 Board of Directors of Toastmasters District 12; 2015-16 Area Director, Toastmasters International District 12; 2014-15 President, Temecula Toastmasters; 2015-16, Teacher, Good News Club; 2013-14, Sunday School Teacher, Rancho Community Church. (See Resume) Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I want to serve on the community service sommission because I love our community and I want to give back. Temecula is home. I was married here and my children were born and raised here. In a way, my family has grown with the city in the last 14 years. We have thoroughly enjoyed the family friendly environment and the quality of living. We actively participate in city's events: library story times, swim lessons, drawing lessons, photo contests, concerts, museums, and fireworks. We love engaging with the community and making friends along the way. I have applied for commissioners twice because I want to be part of the team that makes our community strong. I have been on the receiving end of the commission and I can bring valuable feedback to make the community service even better. I believe I am qualified because I am a leader, planner and communicator. I have served on various committees. Currently I am the vice chair of the board of directors of Harbor Springs Charter School and the president of my HOA. I have also served as area director, president and VP membership of Toastmasters. I volunteer regularly at my church and my children's school. I was voted the Toastmaster of the year because of my leadership. My PhD training and research work gave me a keen eye for details and the ability to solve problems and think critically. I am also an award -winning speaker and I desire to use my skills whenever needed. I am competitive, compassionate and competent. I have an all -in attitude that causes me to strive for excellence. In addition, I am a team player who wants the best for the whole team. Therefore, I believe I will be a valuable addition to the commission. I am also interested in the REDI commission as I do not see an Asian female represented on the current commission. I believe my background will bring value to this commission. I am ready to serve wherever the council see fit. Value Statement Yuan Hawkes Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I have great appreciation for equity, diversity and inclusion ever since I arrived in the United States. The equity I received, the diversity I experienced and the inclusion I felt since the first day I set my foot on this land influenced me greatly on my decision to become a naturalized citizen. I have had opportunities to uphold those values. I enjoy being part of a community with a diverse population of various ethnic, economic, educational and age levels. Through my position as a director on the governing board of Springs Charter School, together with other board members, I take pride in the diversity of our student population. While I was the area director or president of Toastmasters I made sure I treated everyone equally with no partiality. As the VP of membership for Toastmasters, I ensured everyone was included regardless they were a member or a guest. If appointed, I will continue to uphold those principles and draw from my experience. Because when I include everyone on the team, treat everyone with respect and impartially and appreciate the diversity of the team, then I have a winning team that can accomplish anything. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Kathleen Hermsmeyer, Ed.D. Superintendent, Springs Charter School, kathleen.hermsmeyer@springscs.org; Mary Jo Jarrell, Marketing Director, Chick-fil-A Murrieta,- Steven Solorzano, Business Owner, Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? None Selected Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Yuan Hawkes Attachments Question applies to multiple boards modified _CV -Yuan Hawkes.pdf Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Dr. _Yuan _Hawkes_Letter _of Rec_051421.pdf Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. Ff I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Yuan Hawkes I ppw— - — AOAIW arm wo I 5rings CHARTER SCHOOLS May 13, 2021 Dear City Council of Temecula, I highly recommend Dr. Yuan Hawkes as a candidate for the Temecula planning commission. In fact, she is well suited to any role or position that requires intelligence, critical thinking, responsibility, excellent communication, and leadership. My name is Dr. Kathleen Hermsmeyer, and I am the Superintendent of the Springs Charter School network, which enrolls more than 9500 students in and around the Temecula area. Dr. Hawkes began with us as a board member for Harbor Springs Charter School in 2019. In this role, she works tirelessly promoting our school's mission of parent choice and continuing our commitment to excellence. Her background as an innovative scientist, Toastmasters area director, and public speaker means that she is able to add value to our board and truly support the growth and development of our expanding operation. Yuan deeply believes in our charter school's core belief of personalizing learning for all students. She is an active parent at River Springs Charter School's Temecula Student Center, her children's school site. Yuan is always willing to volunteer for extra duties, including several subcommittees. At all times, she is prepared and thoughtful. Our board packets are often over 200 pages each month, so that's no small feat! We appreciate Yuan's energy and fearlessness in advocating for students. She is successful because of her grace, professionalism, and a "can -do" spirit. Dr. Hawkes would be an asset to the planning commission and has my highest recommendation. If you have any further questions with regard to her background or qualifications, please do not hesitate to call me on my cell phone at Sincerely, Kathleen Hermsmeyer, Ed.D. Yuan Hawkes, PhD Temecula, CA 92591 QUALIFICATIONS • Award winning leader with 10+ years experience. • High performing research scientist with 10 years of post graduate experience and excellent academic qualifications. • Substantial knowledge in molecular biology, antibody engineering and cancer biology. • Exceptional follow-through abilities to plan and oversee projects from concept to successful delivery. Well -organized and detail oriented. • Demonstrated ability to prioritize multiple responsibilities to achieve results. • Extensive experience working with cross -functional teams. • Excellent presentation, written and project management skills. • Highly motivated with a proven record of productivity. • Strong experiment design and troubleshooting skills. EDUCATION AND WORK EXPERIENCE Director 2019-present Springs Charter School Scientist III 2008- 2011, Millipore, Antibody Development Scientist II 2007-2008, Millipore, Antibody Development Research Asso 2003-2007, The Scripps Research Institute, Post-doc 2002-2003, Alexion Antibody Technologies Ph.D. 1997-2002, University of Illinois at Chicago, Molecular Biology. B.S. 1993-1997, Wuhan University, Biology. VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE 2018- present: HOA President (Award Series Association) 2020-2021: VP of Membership (Optimal Speakers Toastmasters) 2015-2016: Area Director (Toastmasters District 12) 2014-2015: President (Temecula Toastmasters) 2015-2016: Teacher (Good News Club) 2013-2014: Teacher(Rancho Community Church) WORK EXPERIENCE 2019- present: Board Director (Springs Charter School) • Oversee the sound fiscal and operational management of the school 2007-2011: Research Scientist II & III (Millipore, Bioscience) Successfully developed a recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibodies program which rescued the antibody production from unstable rabbit hybridomas. Yuan Hawkes—Curriculum vitae e2 • Independently developed a novel method of engineering recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibodies from rabbit hybridoma cells within 6 months of date of hire. • Promoted from scientist II to scientist I II after 5 months on the job. • Successfully launched 20 recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibodies which became the top sellers among Millipore's antibody portfolio, • Constructed CHO stable cell lines for production and easy scale -up. • Provided technical leadership and guidance to junior Scientists. • Consistently received "high meet" on annual performance review. Converted human antibodies to mouse or rabbit recombinant antibodies. • Achieved great success by developing the top two selling antibodies, among several thousand, in less than a year since their launch in 2009,bringing in $200k annual revenue. • Demonstrated success in forging and nurturing collaborations among R&D, marketing and manufacturing. • Delivered these antibodies ahead of timelines 2003- 2007: Postdoctoral Scientist (The Scripps Research Institute, Dr. Carlos F Barbas, III ) Project 1: Studied the effect of engineered tetravalent bispecific antibodies in tumor angiogenesis. • Engineered one of a kind bispecific tetravalent antibodies in adenovirus system and transient transfection system. • Purified large scale of adenovirus and recombinant antibodies for in vivo tumor model. • Designed and executed mouse xenograft tumor models. • Characterized the engineered antibodies by FACS, western blotting, ELISA, proliferation and migration assays. • Stained xenograft tumor tissues using Immunohistochemistry. Project 2: Designed and produced various IgG fusions proteins. 2002- 2003: Postdoctoral Scientist (Alexion Antibody Technologies, Inc.) Discovering therapeutic antibodies for cancers byphage display technology. • Constructed phage display libraries • Performed whole cell panning using constructed libraries. • High -throughput screening using 96-well FACS and ELISA on Tecan. • Obtained and characterized a panel of potential targets after high -throughput screening. 1997-2002: Ph-D thesis research (University of Illinois at Chicago, Molecular Genetics) Studied the roles of a breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Project 1: Identified a novel pathway of BRCA2 by its interaction with a cytoskeleton protein filamin-1. Yuan Hawkes—Curriculum vitae e3 • Extensively characterized the interaction and mapped the interaction domains. • Established a number of stable cell lines through retroviral infection or electroporation. • Discovered novel roles of filamin-1 in mammalian DNA damage response through its interaction with BRCA2. • Identified down -regulation of filamin-1 in colon, stomach, uterus and rectum tumors by cDNA hybridization. Project 2: Identified a novel protein BCCIPa (a potential tumor suppressor) as a BRCA2- interacting protein. • Thoroughly characterized the interaction and mapped the interaction domain in BRCA2. • Purified BCCIPa for polyclonal antibody production. PROFESSIONAL SKILLS • Molecular biology: DNA/RNA extraction, gene cloning, vector design, library construction, PCR, RT-PCR, and site -specific mutagenesis. • Cell biology: stable CHO cell construction and banking, retroviral infection, large scale adenovirus CSC12 purification/infection, lipo-transfection, eletroporation, flow cytometry, cell cycle analysis, immunohistochemistry, fluorescent and confocal microscopy, cell -based assays (e.g. DNA repair, proliferation, migration assays) • Biochemistry: recombinant protein expression and purification, FPLC purification, Western blotting, cellular protein fractionation, and protein -protein interaction assays (GST pull -down, co-immunoprecipitation & yeast two -hybrid). • High -throughput screening: ELISA, 96-well FACS, automated machine (Tecan and Qpix). • Computer skills: Accolade, Oracle, Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Photoshop, DNA Star, Macvector, VectorNTl, CellQuest and bioinformatics. • Preclinical tumor models: model design, anesthesia, IP, IV and SC injection, eye or tail vein bleeding, tumor measurement and in vivo Matrigel plug assay. • Written skills: Scientific writing of publications and grant applications. MANAGEMENT SKILLS • Trained and supervised junior scientists and visiting scholars on recombinant monoclonal antibody projects (2005-2011) PUBLICATIONS • Tragoolpua, K., Intasai , N., Kasinrerk, W., Mai, S., Yuan, Y. and Tayapiwatana, C. 2008. Generation of functional scFv intrabody to abate the expression of CD147 surface molecule of 293A cells. BMC Biotechnology 8:5 • Yuan, Y., Meng, X.,_Maestas, A. and Shen, Z. 2004. Recovery from DNA damage -induced G2 arrest requires actin -binding protein filamin-A/actin-binding protein 280. J Biol Chem. 279: 6098-105 • Yuan, Y., and Shen, Z. 2001. Interaction with BRCA2 suggests a role for filamin-1 (hsFLNa) in DNA damage response. J Biol Chem. 276:48318-24. Yuan Hawkes—Curriculum vitae e4 • Liu, J., Y. Yuan, Huan, J., and Shen, Z. 2001. Inhibition of breast and brain cancer cell growth by BCCIPa, an evolutionarily conserved nuclear protein that interacts with BRCA2. Oncogene 20:336-45. MEETING PRESENTATIONS • Yuan Y. J. Archdeacon. etc. 2009, AACR, Recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibodies recognizing polyubiquitin chians joined through lys 48 or lys63. • Yuan, Y. and C. Yang. 2007, Engineering of recombinant rabbit antibodies, Millipore science expo. • Yuan, Y. and N. Jendreyko, M. Popkov, C. Rader and C. Barbas. 2005. Targeting tumor angiogenesis with intrabodies. Keystone Symposia. Santa Fe, NM. • Yuan, Y. and Z. Shen. 2002. A role of filamin-1 in the adaptation of G2-arrest following irradiation. 49th Annual Meeting of the Radiation Research Society, Reno, Nevada. • Yuan, Y., G. Iliakis and Z. Shen. 2001. Role of filamin-1 in DNA damage response. Gordon Research Conference (Radiation Oncology). Ventura, CA. • Yuan, Y. and Z. Shen. 2000. Lack of ABP-280 renders melanoma cells hypersensitive to gamma radiation. Second annual Steve Schiff Center for Skin Cancer Research Mini -Symposium. Albuquerque, NM. AWARDS • 1st place, Toastmasters Speech Contest, 2016, 2017, 2019 • 2nd Place,Toastmasters International Speech Contest, 2017, 2019 • 3rd Place, Toastmasters Humorous Speech Contest, 2016 • Toastmaster of The Year, 2014-1015 • Young Investigator Travel Award, 49th Annual Meeting of the Radiation Research Society, Reno, Nevada, 2002 • First Place Poster Winner, University of New Mexico, 2000 City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 07, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Martha A. Howard First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92591 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 5 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. BA Psychology AA Liberal Arts AA Behavioral Social Science AA Humanities Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. I'm a retired military spouse; please see resume listing past employers. Martha A. Howard Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Please see resume. Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Latina Association of Riverside County, President and Founder. This is a civic engagement organization since 2011. Please see resume to expand information related to this question. Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I'm a 27 years Temecula resident. I know my community well, and I am familiar with its accomplishments and needs; as a long time resident, I want to contribute drawing from my own personal experiences, and to give back to my community. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I will hold equity, diversity, and inclusion values with honesty, respect, and understanding that our personal world view had to provide space for differences. Also I will place a high value on these principles by truly representing my community at large, knowing our resources, strengths, and weaknesses that I may be able to advocate for better education, economic growth, and a healthy community. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Allison Donahoe -Beggs, Social Worker. Maureen Bodine, Retired Registered Nurse. Tami Simms, Retired Registered Nurse. Self -Selection Options Martha A. Howard Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards RESUME _FOR _THE _REDI_COMMISSION _TEMECULAIpdf Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Letter of Recommendation_for _REDI_Commission.pdf Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards BA in Psychology.pdf Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. PF I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Martha A. Howard Z4r trustees of Zhe f if=T*a �t* Pnijamik me recommenbation of t c fan t of Taft-farnia *##tt#e Uuiujeroft�an Marras halic cmtiferreb upon MARTHA ANGELICA HOWARD the rie$ree of BACHELOR OF ARTS PSYCHOLOGY £u0 afl t4je ru oa oib privileges pertttimg t4treto (6ioen of Aan Parrus, Udarnia, on tlTis ifvzdd -first Lair of December, duo tllaus=b anb six. �reaiIIed of }fie $Hulot �l�r Q'al�rtm o4fa{e �i3ribrr�iiQ Pr � mb uf $rrultts vw " vrt.r.ettl Gia[ifnrrrie �hdt �niUertAe ,,San �$iartm September 2, 2021 To Whom This May Concern, My name is Steven Schwartz and I am proud to offer my recommendation of Martha Howard who I have known for six years to be a member of the REDI Commission. Martha has work tirelessly as President of the Latina Association of Riverside County for almost nine years to secure fair and equal treatment of Latinos in the County During my relationship with Martha I have experienced an individual who shows up earlier than asked, works hard, and carries herself in a polite and respectable manner. Martha has always presented herself with levelheadedness and grace. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should require any further information. Steven Schwartz Board Member TVUSD Martha Howard Resume for REDI Commission September 6, 2021 Martha A. Howard Temecula, CA 9259 Email: Areas of Practice: Administrative Support. Human Development. Medical Administration. Social and Behavioral Community Engagement. Experience: One hundred percent of experience devoted to Human Development Services, Public Policy, and Psychosocial Services. Since my retirement, I founded a community engagement organization Latina Association of Riverside County; we partnership with other organizations and professionals to advocate for public policy, provide bilingual citizenship classes, health clinics to the unhoused, immigration clinics, and voting registration drives. Education: California State University San Bernardino (Accepted to the M.A. Social Work Program 2008). California State University San Marcos B.A. Diploma in Psychology, 2006. Mount San Jacinto JR College A.A. Diplomas in Humanities, Liberal Arts, and Behavioral Social Science, 2002. Honors and Awards: City of Temecula Certificate of Recognition, 2018 NAACP Women of the Year, 2018. Martha Howard Resume for REDI Commission Perris Alliance for Community Empowerment, 2013. Past Employment Positions (1994-2008). Hospice of the Valleys, Murrieta, California. MCAS Miramar CDC, San Diego California. Rancho Springs Medical Center, Murrieta California. City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 07, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Windy L Johnson First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap PF District 1 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See Resume Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See Resume Windy L Johnson Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. None Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Saint Jeanne de Lestonnac School Parent Volunteer Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I have reached a point in my life where I am ready to give back more fully to the community where we raised our family. We have lived and loved living in Temecula for over 20 years. We've witnessed historic growth and development and seen businesses flourish and flounder. My husband and I have attended city meetings regarding the placement of stoplights; we've attended school board meetings when we feel our expectations are not being met. The Fourth of July parade in Old Town was a yearly tradition for us and both of our daughters have marched in the parade at one point. We've ice skated in Old Town and celebrated New Year's Eve there as well regularly patronizing the stores and restaurants. As I see it, Temecula is and has been a beautiful town to call home, yet my fresh perspective, my guiding hand, and my clear eyes will lead it into the glory years. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. To uphold the principles of equity, diversity, and inclusion I would quite simply be true to my own self. I am a confident woman who is strong in faith values, and justice. In fact, my maiden name is Just and during college, I had several professors remark that I always has a "just" way of looking through a lens. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Kristen Mora, Principal St. Jeanne de Lestonnac School, kmora@sjdls.com Heather Janikowski, co-worker, Shelly Bendykowski, co-worker,- sbendykowski@sjdls.com Windy L Johnson Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Windy_ Johnson_resume.pdf Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. W I Agree Windy L Johnson Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Windy L Johnson Windy Johnson SUMMARY An enthusiastic and dedicated employee who strives to actively engage in meaningful life experiences to develop my full potential. Highly motivated, creative, and flexible team player who has managed and mentored young professionals. Works well with a variety of personality types. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE TEACHER I ST. JEANNE DE LESTONNAC August, 2009 - Present I Temecula, CA • Provides a structured and nurturing learning environment with clear expectations that encourage students to perform at their high level of excellence • Implements differentiation strategies with learning centers to address the various educational needs of 24 plus students • Collaborates with coworkers and administration with planning, supporting, and sharing school -wide responsibilities as well as the success of all students • Communicates with parents on a regular basis through the use of emails, phone calls, conferences, and weekly newsletters • Observes, plans, and develops meaningful lessons and activities to promote growth mindset in the classroom COUNSELOR and EDITOR I ADVANCED COLLEGE SOLUTIONS September, 2007 - June, 2009 1 Temecula, CA • Responsible for editing student's college admissions essays • Edited and proofread student's college applications • Facilitate the college application process for students and parents PRODUCATION EDITOR PINE FORGE PRESS June, 1997 - April, 1999 Thousand Oaks, CA • Produced and edited over 100 college text books in the fields of Sociology, Sociology of Family, among others • Managed the production process from manuscript stage to bound book, meeting deadlines • Edited and proofread titles for grammatical inconsistencies EDITOR I PRICE STERN SLOAN June, 1995 - June, 1997 1 Los Angeles, CA • Edited and authored a variety of children's books including, but not limited to: Mad Libs, WorkStation, PlayStation, calendars, Muppets titles, and individual titles • Edited titles for factual information as well as grammatical correctness • Worked directly with authors, outside editors, proof readers, coov editors to meet deadlines I:K6l211HMom FO 13 Temecula, CA 92592 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cerro Coso Community College Child Development Teacher EDUCATION BACHELOR OF ARTS Pepperdine University December, 1994 English Major Spanish Minor City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 29, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Regina D Knight-Paquet First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92591 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 5 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. History - AA History - BA Higher Education - MS Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Temecula Tutor - Manager of Operations The operation of the business Accounts receivable/payable Human Resources/Payroll Regina D Knight-Paquet Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. River Springs Charter School PTSA - Positions held: President/Vice President/Secretary - 5 years Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Girls Scout Leader for Troop 2458 - 4 years Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. My goal in this position is to maintain the racial diversity from the voices of our beloved community. I have lives within the wonderful city for over 10 years. Within this time I have noticed how special it is and how the people who live in this community not only truly care for it, but are so kind to one another. If I can add to this by bringing our community closer together in our understanding of our diversity, knowing that we may look different and have different cultures, we are all still one. And due to this diversity, allows our community to flourish. Over the years I have watched this city grow into a beautiful and special place in which I know I can continue to help narrow the bridge of tolerance in racial division. I truly look forward to making this happen. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. Placing a high value on the principles of equity, diversity, and inclusion would be the number one reason of why I want this position. How would I maintain this high value would come with tolerance of other. This would be the key! Research and learning from past appointed members would also be how it would be maintained. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Helai Miller (Owner of Temecula Tutor) Phone - Michael Grimmett (Fallbrook City School Bus Division) Phone: Charles Grimmett (Temecula Tutor Consultant) Phone: Regina D Knight-Paquet Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. rJ I Agree Regina D Knight-Paquet Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Regina D Knight-Paquet City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 17, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Lyman Legters First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Greenbelt MD 20770 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 5 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See resume Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. See resume Lyman Legters Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. King County (WA) Coalition on Racial Equity, Executive Team, 2005-2012 City of Seattle Racial Justice Roundtable, 2010-2012 WA State Governor's Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee, Member, 2004-2007 Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. People's Institute for Survival and Beyond, National Board of Directors, 2019-current DC Unity and Justice Fellowship, Leadership Team, 2018-2021 Citizen Heights Church (DC), Associate Pastor, 2014-2021 Little Lights Urban Ministries, Race Literacy 101 Group Facilitator 2019-2021 CityYear Seattle/King County (WA), Board of Directors, 2004-2010 Alliance on Racial Equity, Steering Committee, 2005-2010 Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. My wife and I just relocated to Temecula from the Washington, DC, area. I have not worked with the City previously, and am excited to be of service to my new community. I have a passion for justice and equity along with significant experience, and believe I can add value to the mission and work of the Commission... and desire to contribute to Temecula. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. These principles are core to my own values and orientation. If appointed I commit embracing and modeling that each of these principles in Commission discussions, analyses and decisions. I will use my experience in organizing and facilitation of justice centered efforts to contribute to the business of the Commission. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Denyse Wilson, Realtor/REDI Commissioner: I Adriene V. Brown, Writer/Anti-racist Organizer: ajordan@freedupfilms.com Dr. Kimberley Richards, Executive Director, People's Institute for Survival and Beyond kmberley@pisab.org Lyman Legters Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Lyman _Legters_resume _2.01.docx Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards City of Temecula_RaceRev.2.docx Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. 9 1 Agree Lyman Legters Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Lyman Legters 1 - PRIVATE City of Temecula Race, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion Commission Letter of Recommendation for Lyman Legters To Whom It May Concern, I am pleased to offer my recommendation for Lyman Legters as a prospective member of the Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission for the City of Temecula. I met Lyman and his wife Stevey-Wonderful as they were relocating to Temecula from the Washington, DC area. They became official residents of Temecula in August and are looking to connect in the community. From the moment I met Lyman and his lovely wife via zoom I got a good-hearted feeling about him and his character. He is truly about the cause of justice and bringing people together. He is a great listener, thinks about a solution before acting, and love collaborating with people. I have invited them to my church, and they have already started meeting people in our community. Lyman has extensive experience and expertise in social services, with a strong focus on racial justice and equity. He has served on numerous boards and commissions in support of racial justice efforts. Lyman is a trained anti -racist organizer and has experience facilitating numerous equity -focused efforts across public systems, including the federal government, philanthropy, and the faith community. Lyman's character and values align with the equity, diversity and inclusion principles embraced by the city. The combination of his experience, expertise, commitment to community and passion for justice make him a viable candidate for the Commission, and I highly recommend his appointment. Sincerely, Denyse Wilson, REDI Commissioner Lyman Legters Temecula, CA 92591 Ilegters@casey.org SUMMARY Proven visionary leader who creates strategic alliances across sectors, systems and contexts, and with community to effectively develop and execute key initiatives. Demonstrated track record in improving organizational health in complex environments, and developing high performance teams through selecting, developing and motivating skilled professionals. Results - based orientation with strong business acumen. Skilled communicator with a focus on creating and reinforcing clarity. Strategic thinker with a multi -systems orientation. Effective in motivating and leading change, and a student of implementation science. Lifelong orientation towards anti - racism, equity and justice, with a particular focus on eliminating racial disparities and dismantling systems/structures that perpetuate inequities. EXPERIENCE Casey Family Programs 6/2002 - Present Senior Director, Strategic Consulting. 01/2016 to Current Washington, DC Cultivates partner relationships with leaders from state, county, and tribal child and family serving systems within specific states and across the country. Develops strategic plans and manages foundation's investments and resources devoted to reform efforts, all aligned with Casey Family Program's mission to provide, improve and ultimately prevent the need for, foster care. Provides expert consulting services to jurisdiction leaders. Represents the foundation in national efforts: Youth Transition Funders Group; US Department of Justice, Office of Victims of Crime, Linking Systems of Care; Alliance for Racial Equity; PACE Centers All About Girls Network and Summit. Contributes to strategic planning and racial equity efforts within the foundation. Senior Fellow, US Department of Justice. 03/2012 to 12/2016 Washington, DC Senior Fellow at the US Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs. Provided expert consultation and technical support to Attorney General's Defending Childhood Initiative, and DOJ's National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention. Provided consultation to Assistant US Attorney General and Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Administrator on: Organizational health and leadership development; cross -systems alignment and coordination; philanthropic engagement; racial, gender and sexual orientation equity; juvenile justice systems reform; community, youth and family engagement. Spearheaded cross -functional, cross -agency initiative to alignment between Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice Systems reform initiatives. Supported DOJ engagement efforts with the Faith community. Senior Director, Seattle Field Office. 06/2002 to 02/2012 Seattle, WA Leadership responsibility for all aspects of the field office operations. Provided vision, leadership and strategic direction to Field Office Management Team, staff, partners and stakeholders. Led the office through major transformation at outset of Casey's 2020 vision, shifting the fundamental focus and work from long-term foster care to permanency and safe reduction of children in foster care. Managed all field office operations including personnel actions, resource allocations, budget development and monitoring, external communications and crisis and risk management. Provided sound analysis and recommendations internally and externally regarding human services system improvement efforts. Provided leadership and direction for highly skilled, highly motivated, well -trained team of professionals. King County, WA 01/1982-06/2002 Manaaer. Juvenile Court Services. 01/1992 to 06/2002 King County Superior Court 0 Seattle, WA Provided direct probation services for youth accused/adjudicated of criminal behavior; supervision of probation services; implementation of evidenced based intervention and prevention programs across King County and Washington State, and front end practice change through state-wide implementation of Motivational Interviewing; ultimately responsible for leadership/management of probation services and programs across King County. EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts: Political Science, Washington State University 0 Pullman, WA, USA Minor in Sociology Master of Arts: Public Administration, University of Washington 0 Seattle, WA, USA CURRENT PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Peoples Institute For Survival And Beyond — National Board of Directors (www.pisab.org) Youth Transition Funders Group - National Steering Committee (www.ytfg.org) Georgetown University Center for Juvenile Justice Reform PUBLICATIONS Investing to Improve the Well -Being of Vulnerable Youth and Young Adults https://www.ytfg.org/2015/12/wellbeing/ http://ytfg.org/2021/05/investing-in-the-well-being-and-well-becoming-of-americas-young- people -recommendations -for -philanthropy -policy -and -practice/ City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 03, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Victor First Name Home Address Temecula City McDowell Middle Initial Last Name Suite or Apt CA 92591 State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap * W District 4 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Assoc Degree in the Adminstration of Justice via West College and the Los Angeles Police Academy. Hundreds of hours in in-service training over 34 years in law enforcement from June 1981 to May 2015 Victor McDowell Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Los Angeles Police Dept from June 1981 to May 2015 (Retired Police Detective) May 2015 to Dec 2016 Defensive Coord (Football Coach) at Walnut High School, in Walnut CA. Aug of 2017 Asst Middle School Football Coach at Linfield Christian School, Temecula,CA. Jan 2018 to Present Head Football Coach Middle School Tackle Football at Linfield Christian School, Temecula, CA. September 2019 to Present, Personal Trainer Owner/Operator High Impact Sports, Temecula, CA Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. As a Police Officer and Detective with Los Angeles Police Department, I have been connected to numerous members of many communities. I was a Junvenile Investigator directly connected to our youth. I have been a board member on numerous youth sports leagues. I was the president of a non profit charity public safety football team. I'm currently the general manager for the Los Angeles Centurions (LAPD charity Football team) Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. California Blue Knights Southern California StrikeForce DIAMOND Bar Pop Warner Diamond Bar Pony Baseball Walnut Valley Cowboys Rialto Pop Warner Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I wish to serve on the commission due my experience as a child of the Civil rights movement. Also being an African American male that spent the majority my life in law enforcement. Growing up in the inner city gives me a view that not many law enforcement officials have. Also I have continued to work with youth for over 30 years. I have coached and continued to coach kids from many backgrounds. Diversity is a driving force in my life. Inclusion is a daily mission for me Value Statement Victor McDowell Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. With my unlimited ability to communicate the importance of other views. Expanding our outlook of how we receive people that have a different path. Everyone has a different path. Respecting our differences along with learn the challenges and enlightenment of others References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Jeff McCain Coach/Business Owner Patriot Pipeline/ Jim Toth, friend/Business Owner Chick-fil-A, Temecula/ Keife Alex, Friend„/Sgt USCDPS, kalex@caps.usc.edu, Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Victor McDowell Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. IW I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Victor McDowell City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 02, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Paula First Name Home Address Temecula City A Minger Middle Initial Last Name Suite or Apt CA 92591 State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap * W District 4 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. High School 1969 and LVN license 1973 Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Retired Business owner for majority of my life. Sold to Clntas Corp Paula A Minger Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. None Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. None Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I retired to Temecula in 2012 My husband and I absolutely love this City and want to maintain the small town feel while keeping up with the times Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I support these principles for all our citizens References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): After I've learned more about the position Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. PaulaA Minger Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. V I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. PaulaA Minger City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 16, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Farhat Niazi First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 3 Email Address Primy one Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. B.Sc Education/biological science Diploma in art, business management Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Associate at the HomeDepot at various positions Farhat Niazi Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. None Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Volunteer at elementary school Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I was engaged in school ELAC meetings, and budget planning. An immigrant and a member of different race would know better that in today's society, how much racial equity and Non discriminatory behavior is needed for the benefit and welfare of each individual and overall just society. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I think there are few factors that contribute to racial discrimination like ignorance about different cultures and ethnicities, Fear of unknown and lack of empathy. Each individual should be exposed from beginning about these differences. I will work to promote awareness that difference do exist but we should on every stage, level and job work together for betterment of society. Just like diversity in garden promotes harmonious ecosystem. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): April human resource assistant Home Depot lia Suri , Friend Sara B ,department supervisor Home Depot Self -Selection Options Farhat Niazi Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards farhat resume 2021 retail.doc Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. PF I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Farhat Niazi Farhat Niazi • Temecula, CA 92592 • OBJECTIVE: Apply my customer service knowledge to provide a pleasant and professional experience for our customers. QUALIFICATIONS: • Provide efficient, and considerate customer service • Excellent communication skills • Strong ability to develop customer relations EXPERIENCE Customer Service Associate - The Home Depot • Provide assistance in various departments • Leading in New Pro customer signups • Selected for and Completed HD Supervisor training • Highest Sales of Marquee paint during 2016 and 2017 • Platinum homer award 2017 / Gold homer award - 2016 Cashier - The Home Depot • Front End Point of Sales Effective instruction at a variety of academic level Implementation of curriculum Classroom management and discipline 2015 -- Present 2014 - 2015 • Employee of the Month - Oct. 2014 • Highest number of new Credit-card sign-ups Self Employed 2004 - Present • Operating home -based alteration and design for commercial and individual clientele Teacher Assistant - Paloma Elementary, Mesa View and Perris Head Start, Perris, CA 2009 - 2014 • Assisted primary teacher in checking homework, organizing papers and making instructional materials e.g. flash cards • Book reading in class room environment. • Assisted in planning and organizing library trip/farewell party for preschool children. • Art Classes Sales Associate/Cashier - Target Corporation, Valencia, CA 2003 - 2004 • Daily management for cash handling, opening and closing register. • Demonstrated effective communication skills through customer service. • Positive interaction with individuals at all levels. • Worked well independently as well as part of a team. Elementary School Teacher - Public School, Multan, Pakistan 1996 - 2001 • Instructed classroom of up to 25 students, from 2"d to 8d' grades, and earned accolades for the quality of teaching by using effective techniques in teaching diverse subjects e.g. Math, English, Science and Social Studies. • Taught biology to 9`' grade for one term. • Communicated progress to parents in trimester -based progress reports. • Established and maintained positive relationships with students, parents, fellow teachers and school administrators. Private Tutoring - Self Employed, Pakistan 1996 -1999 • Worked one-on-one with elementary school students in subjects including Math, Science, and English. EDUCATION 1 CERTIFICATION Bachelor of Science - Science & Education - Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan 1999 Courses - Marketing, Interior Design, Art - College of the Canyon, Valencia, CA 2004- 2005 Passed USPS Postal Exam (Carrier) 2006 SKILLS Languages Urdu and English. Can read Arabic Computer Related Microsoft Office, Photoshop, Internet (IE, Firefox, Chrome) Personal Interests Gardening, Reading, Cooking, Furniture Refinishing, Crafting, Sewing City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 31, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Marty J. Nicholson First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 3 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Bachelor's of Science in Education, Master's in Public Administration and Juris Doctorate in Law. Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Nicholson Law Firm 2019-2020 Calhoun & Associates 2016-2019 Tyler & Bursch 2013-2017 Marty J. Nicholson Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Southern California Municipal Athletic Federal Board, 1997-2000 City of La Quinta, Cultural Arts Commission, staff liaison 1995-1997 City of Fontana, Parks & Recreation Commission, staff liaison 1997- 2000 County of San Diego, Spring Valley Planning Commission elected 1982-1985 Spring Valley Improvement Association, Vice President 1981-1985 Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Salt & Light Ministry 2007-present Calvary Chapel Bible Fellowship Culver City Exchange Club, member and President 2000-2007 Culver City YMCA Board Member 2001-2007 Temecula Youth Basketball Association, Board Member 1999-2000 Fontana Exchange Club, secretary 1995-1997 Boys & Girls Club, Board member 1995-1997 Soroptimist, member and President 1982-1990 Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I would like to serve the City of Temecula in order to improve the quality of life for its residents. I am very interested in public service and have recently retired and am no longer commuting to other cities to serve. I have attended planning meetings on certain issues and attended city events in the past. Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. I would strive to make sure every decision I make upholds the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. I spent five years as a civil rights attorney making sure the disabled population has equal access and would continue to strive towards that goal. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Mike Naggar, project manager, I think you have his email. Robert Tyler, attorne , _rtyler@tylerbursch.com Harold Coleman, attorney, Self -Selection Options Marty J. Nicholson Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. PF I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Marty J. Nicholson City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Sep 01, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Stuart Pieklik First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap W District 3 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. High school diploma Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Retired from local union 250 pipefitters Stuart Pieklik Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. This board needs more diversity Value Statement Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. Honesty,fairness and experience References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Mark Sinai Kevin Knox Evan gray Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Stuart Pieklik Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. V I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Stuart Pieklik City of Temecula - Boards and Commissions Appointment Application Important Information Submit Date: Oct 18, 2021 The appointment process is a public process subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and Public Records Act. An applicant presentation is required at a City Council meeting. An applicant must be a resident of the City of Temecula at the time the application is submitted. All applications on file at the close of an advertised period for a vacancy will be considered. Profile Seena Trigas First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt Temecula CA 92592 City State Postal Code Which district do you live in? Find your district here: https://temeculaca.gov/districtmap PF District 1 Email Address Primary Phone Note: The City of Temecula has one board and four commissions. While more than one selection may be made below, applicants are encouraged to only select that board and/or commission(s) that they truly wish to serve on. Thank you. Which Boards would you like to apply for? Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission: For Review Education and Employment Question applies to multiple boards List Educational Background (Degrees, Licenses, Certificates, etc.). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Master of Arts: New York University with a major in U.S. History Bachelor of Arts: George Washington University with a major in Political Science Community College Teaching Credential: U.S. History Secondary School Teaching Credential: Social Science Seena Trigas Question applies to multiple boards List Employment History for Five Years (Employer Name and Address, Position Title, Primary Responsibilities). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. Palomar College: Adjunct Professor teaching U.S. History 101 and U.S. History 102 (1992-2021) Vista Unified School District: Social Science Department Chair and teacher (history, government, economics) - 1992-2010 Service Experience Question applies to multiple boards List Previous City/County/State Board/Committee/Commission Service (Name of Entity, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. San Marcos Unified School District Trustee: 1983-1996 (President and other positions on the board) San Diego County School Boards Association: 1988-90 President and member of the Executive Committee 1983-96) Carlsbad Planning Commission: Chair: (1996-2000) Carlsbad Library Board: President and trustee (1980-96) Carlsbad Citizens Committee for Growth Management Plan Initiative 1986 Question applies to multiple boards List Organizational Service (Professional, Technical, Volunteer, Non -Profit, Service Clubs) (Name of Group, Positions Held, Years of Service). State "see resume" if attaching a resume with this information at the end of this application. American Association of University Women (AAUW): Board positions and member (2009- current) Batiquitos Lagoon Foundation: Co -Founder and past member/President 1987-88 La Costa Youth Organization: Co -Founder 1979 League of Women Voters: Director 1980-84 Statement of Interest Question applies to multiple boards Describe why you wish to serve on this commission, how you have engaged with the City previously (i.e., attending meetings and events, etc.), and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. I moved to Temecula in October 2019 to be close to my daughter and family. They have lived here for 18 years and established strong ties in the community. My son-in-law, Jimmy Peters, is Artistic Director at Temecula Dance studio. I was very active in North County and taught at both the high school level(Vista High) and college (Palomar College) level in the social sciences. I believe strongly in giving back to my community; it has become a commitment I have made to myself even in my retirement. I am currently volunteering with AAUW to send middle school girls to STEM programs in the summer and helping to raise funds for women to continue their education at the college/graduate level in STEM programs. I have a strong interest in promoting equal opportunity for all Americans and believe that we must protect against discrimination at any level. As my background information indicates, giving back to my community has been my life's work, as well as teaching high school and college level students. With my recent move to Temecula, I am now ready to get involved in community service and look forward to learning more about my newly adopted home. Value Statement Seena Trigas Question applies to multiple boards The City of Temecula places a high value on the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. If appointed, how would you uphold and/or contribute to these principles. As a teacher of U.S. History and government, I have always connected the lessons of the past with the issues of today. My major focus has always been on the responsibility of citizenship and applauding our diversity as a nation. As an elected school board member (San Marcos Unified) I have had many occasions where the issues of diversity and equity has led our agenda and our board successfully dealt with those issues, often during politically divisive times. My entire adult life has been one of supporting equity for women and minority groups, and I will continue to pursue this in my Temecula community. References Question applies to multiple boards List Three Professional and/or Personal References (Name, Position, Phone, Email): Carlsbad City Council: Priya Bhat Patel Pbp@priyabhatpatel.com Former Carlsbad City Council: Ann Kulchin EHPS History Department Co -Chair: Palomar College: Bill Jahnel, Professor of History, bjanell@palomar My legal name is Marsha Seena Trigas but I have never been called Marsha and have always used the name Seena. Self -Selection Options Question applies to multiple boards Equal Employment Opportunity The City of Temecula is required by federal and state law to collect certain information and maintain statistical data on applicants. Your responses to the next three questions are confidential and will be filed and tracked separately from your application for appointment. Results are used for reporting purposes only. Question applies to multiple boards What is your gender? Question applies to multiple boards What range does your age fall into below? Question applies to multiple boards What is your ethnic background? Attachments Seena Trigas Question applies to multiple boards Resume - If you wish to attach a resume, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Recommendations - If you wish to attach a letter of recommendation, please do so here. Question applies to multiple boards Miscellaneous - If you wish to attach other materials, please do so here. Acknowledgment Question applies to multiple boards I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information pursuant to the California Public Records Act. rJ I Agree Question applies to multiple boards Note: Please click "save" to ensure proper retention of all information, including attachments, prior to viewing/printing PDF and submitting. Seena Trigas Item No. 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report. The following are the highlights for Community Development for the months of November and December 2021. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES Planning processed 74 new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted six (6) Public Hearings in November and December 2021. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report. Plan Type November 2021 December 2021 Accessory Dwelling Unit 1 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Development Plan 4 0 Extension of Time 0 Home Occupation 16 21 Maps I Massage Permits 19 7 Minor Exception 1 0 Modifications 10 7 Pre -Application 4 4 Residential Tract Product Review 1 0 Temporary Use Permit 2 1 Zoning or Planning Letter 3 5 Tatal 65 46 Everhome Suites (PA21-1350): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 64,500 square foot, four-story, 117 room Everhome Suites Hotel located on the west side of Madison Ave. between Buecking Dr. and McCabe Ct. (COOPER) Temecula Village Phase II (PAs 20-0323, 20-0324, 20-0325, 20-0326): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 134 unit multi -family community built on 7.61 acres; a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel; a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village). The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis and with an environmental consultant to prepare and environmental document. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. (COOPER) Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER) Solana Winchester (PA20-1371): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 350-unit apartment community located within the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan at the terminus of Date Street approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road. The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. (COOPER) Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station (PAs 21-0075, 21-0076): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling pumps, convenience store, quick service restaurant, and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480 Sanborn Avenue. (COOPER) Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA21-0128): The City is processing a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. (COOPER) Firenze (PA21-1023): The City is processing a Development Plan application for an approximately 498,557 square foot hotel and apartment project. The approximately 148,545 square foot, five story, 224 room hotel includes a conference center, restaurant, wine market multi -tenant space, and outdoor courtyard dining space. The approximately 350,012 square foot, seven story, 121 unit apartment building include a roof top area that contains a pool/spa, cabanas, fire pit, media wall, kitchen, fitness area, and lawn/game area. The parking for the project is located on the interior of the apartment building that is wrapped with the residential units. The project is located approximately 665 feet north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. (COOPER) Prado (PAs 21-0838, 21-0839): The City is processing Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map applications for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres consisting of detached rental condominiums. The project includes a clubhouse, pool, bocce ball court, cornhole court, tot lot walking paths, and fitness center. The project is located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road. (COOPER) MS Mountain View Ph. IV (PAs 21-1470, 21-1471, 21-1472): The City is processing three (3) Development Plan applications industrial buildings of 9,867 square feet, 19,727 square feet, and 38,714 square feet located along Avenida Alvarado. (COOPER) Jefferson/Buecking Apartments (PA21-1454): The City is processing a Development Plan application for a 260 unit apartment community located on the north and south side of Buecking Drive at the Jefferson Avenue intersection. (COOPER) Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan Update (PA21-1525): The City is processing a Modification to the previously approved Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan. The updated Master Plan, at buildout will include the existing 237,305 square foot hospital building and 5,180 square foot storage building along with an approximately 102,000 square foot, four story Behavioral Health Building in Phase 2, an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the emergency department, a 125,000 square foot, five story second hospital tower, a 80,000 square foot medical office buildings, and a 12,600 square foot utility plant in Phase 3, and an approximately 125,000 square foot, five story third hospital tower, a 80,000 square three story foot medical office building, and a four story parking structure with the existing helipad relocated to the roof of the structure in Phase 4. The project is located at 31700 Temecula Parkway. (COOPER) LONG RANGE PLANNING General Plan Update The Long Range Planning Division has developed a four -phase, multi -year process to update the General Plan. Phase I is complete and included updates to Housing and Public Safety Elements. Phase I also included an update to the City's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to analyze Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) for CEQA. Phase II is in process and includes an update to the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), reconciling the City's GIS Maps on a parcel by parcel basis, a baseline EIR analysis of the City's Circulation Element, and developing a Complete Streets Policy document. Phase III will include a Fiscal Land Use Study to analyze the City's remaining development capacity and market absorption potential for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The final phase is to work with a General Plan Advisory Committee to update to the General Plan and EIR over an 18-month timeframe. (PETERS) Quality of Life Master Plan Update On April 27, 2021, the City Council established a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP). The QLMP identifies the City's six core values, including: 1) Healthy and Livable City; 2) Economic Prosperity; 3) Safe and Prepared Community; 4) Sustainable City; 5) Transportation Mobility and Connectivity; and 6) Accountable and Responsive City Government. Projects and programs proposed in the City's Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Program must be consistent with the City's Core Values. Performance measures (indicators) are measured annually to track progress and the completion of goals and objectives. (PETERS) Expanded Outdoor Dining and Retail in Old Town: Staff brought this item before City Council on June 8, 2021 for further discussion. The City Council directed staff to extend the temporary program for one year and develop a permanent outdoor dining program. (TOMA, WATSON) Objective Design and Development Standards (LR18-1684): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Objective Design and Development Standards for multi -family and mixed -use residential developments, with the goal of expediting housing production, streamlining approval processes, and establishing the foundation for future regulations and housing laws. Staff is developing Objective Design Standards that will conform with SB 35, and will incorporate objective design guidelines into the City's Development Code. Staff has hired P1aceWorks, to assist with development of our design standards for multifamily and mixed use. On September 28, 2020, staff and Consultant presented six architectural styles to the PC Infill Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo. The Subcommittee agreed with staffs six recommended styles. On October 13, 2020, staff and Consultant presented to the CC Infill Subcommittee consisting of Council Member Naggar and Rahn, the six recommended architecture styles. The Council Members agreed with staffs recommendation to move forward with detailing the styles for the Objective Design Standards. In October 2021, staff and consultant presented to the PC Subcommittee the draft document. The Subcommittee was happy with staff s document and asked to continue requiring higher quality product for residential developments. Since the October 2020 meeting, staff made substantial progress on the project and in September 2021, staff met with the Council Subcommittee again to present the "Hearing Draft" document. The Council Subcommittee was delighted with staffs progress and directed to establish requirements standards that would lead to higher quality product for multi -family and mixed - use development. Furthermore, an anticipating with adoption of SB-9, which allows single-family property to be subdivide into two lots and place duplex on each lot, Staff has directed consultant to develop an additional Duplex/Triplex sheet to be inserted into our document addressing the new state law which goes into effect on January 1, 2022. The project was reviewed by the Planning Commission on December 1, 2021 and is scheduled for review by City Council on January 25, 2022. (TOMA) Permit Ready ADU Program (LR19-1464): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare, adopt, and implement a Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. The ADU program will encourage the construction of ADUs, offering property owners a selection of pre -approved ADU building plans that can be obtained at the community Development Department, free of charge. On September 16, 2020, the RFP closed on PlanetBids. The City received three detailed proposals from qualified consultants. After detailed review of all the proposals, staff selected checkerboardSTUDIOS Consultant Firm. On March 18, 2021, staff kicked off the project with the Consultant and staff from Planning, Building, Public Works, and Fire. This will be a joined effort between the internal departments and the consultant. Staff is working with the consultant on the first task (Phase 1: Schematic Design), staff has provided feedback of the Schematic Design taking into consideration the School District and Development Impact Fee (DIF) fees, and appropriate unit type and size. On, October 19, 2021, staff presented at the draft site plan and architecture designs to the Southern Riverside County Association of Realtors (SRCAR). On November 30, 2021, staff held an Open House to solicit feedback from the professional community (i.e., Engineers, Contractors, Architects, etc.), the meeting will be open to the public. The next step is for the Consultant to complete the construction drawings to make available for the public. (TOMA, RABIDOU) Transportation Discovery and Existing Conditions Analysis (LR20-1071): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal document for staff to identify potential transportation focused areas as part of Phase 2 of our General Plan Update process and timeline. The City has hired Fehr & Peers (F&P) to document existing transportation conditions in the City, provide benchmarking information on how transportation facilities, transportation use and policies compares to other peer agencies (through benchmarking) and will evaluate how much of the current Circulation Element has been implemented. Staff worked with F&P to identify methodology, thresholds, and mitigation to address VMT for CEQA evaluation, which the City Council adopted in May 2020. On July 19, 2021, Staff has a scheduled internal meeting with Fehr & Peers, they present to staff the Data Collection Status. Currently, the consultant is developing the three scenario runs to be reviewed by staff prior to conducting a full model run. (PETERS, TOMA) Mobile Food Trucks (LR20-1472): On February 23, 2021, staff presented to the Economic Development Subcommittee members (ME/JS) on Mobile Food Trucks (MFT). This was a noticed meeting with one public comment in favor of MFT, read by Stuart Fisk. The intent of the meeting was to get the subcommittee's feedback on the potential for MFT to operate in the City. Staff presented the definition of MFTs, existing regulations, standards of operation to consider, and Pros & Cons list. The subcommittee advised staff to create a framework and come back to the committee for discussion. Staff is working on developing the framework. (COLLINS) Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Parks Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan. The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. (PETERS) HOUSING Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City is processing a Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. The developer held a virtual community workshop on July 28, 2020. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on October 7, 2020. An amendment to the Loan Agreement was approved at the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March, 2021. The applicant has submitted Building Permits and Grading Permits. CHW was awarded tax credits in June, 2021. The project is ready to issue Building Permits as of January 1, 2022. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. The developer is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior to construction. The City and developer will collaborate with the County of Riverside and the State Department of Housing and Community Development for additional funding opportunities through the Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March, 2021. (WATSON) Housing Element Update (LR18-1620): The City is working with De Novo Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA process, community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tern Edwards and Council Member Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo, will serve as advisory bodies. Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029. The Final RHNA allocation was issued in September 2020. Staff is working with the consultant to update data and write draft chapters. A Housing Workshop was held on August 17, 2021, with approximately 12 attendees. The item was recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission at the September 15, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. The Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) and California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection have signed -off on the Housing Element. The item was approved by the City Council on October 12, 2021. Staff is waiting for a response from the California Department of Housing and Community Development. Staff will be returning to the City Council in February 2022. (RABIDOU, PETERS) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP): Pre -applications are open for the City of Temecula Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP). This program will provide rental and mortgage assistance to those eligible recipients who were negatively impacted by COVID-19. Checks are being issued for eligible recipients. Over $70,000 in funds have been distributed. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Five Year Consolidated Plan: The City is kicking -off an update to the CDBG Consolidated Plan. Workshops were held on October 27, 2021. Citizens and other stakeholders attended the meeting and provided feedback. A survey is available online for the outreach. Additional information will be available at TemeculaCA.gov/CDBG. (RABIDOU, WATSON) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for November and December 2021 are highlighted in the following table. Building & Safety Statistics November 2021 December 2021 Permits 369 363 New Single Family Units 25 23 New Commercial Building 1 a Photovoltaic 115 117 Tenant Improvements 14 7 Non Construction C of 0 35 Number of Active Plan Checks 327 1117 Number of New Plan Checkt 135 Number of Finaled Permits 226 233 Inspections 2501 24S1 Inspections Per Day 125 91.9 Inspections Per Person Per 31.26 22.97 Stops Per Month 751 711 Visit4rstoCounter 710 752 New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check • Truax Hotel (161,586 SF) • Milgard Windows (30,960 SF canopy) • Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 SF) • Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 SF each) • Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) • Hotel (38,202 SF) on Jefferson and Winchester • Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 SF) • New Industrial Building (32,792 SF) • New Margarita Recreation Center (8,161 SF) New Commercial Buildings • Trinity Lutheran Church Preschool (9,530 SF) Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy • Avery Tea, 40573 Margarita Road (1,500 SF) • Our Matcha Place, 42072 5th Street (1,050 sf) • Vintage Begonia Warehouse, 42309 Winchester Road (3,445 SF) Tenant Improvement • Barber Canvas, 31285 Temecula Parkway (1,450 SF) • Cotijas Taco Shop, 43985 Mahlon Vail Road (1,500 SF) • 100% Chiropractic Temecula, 32909 Temecula Parkway (1,620 SF) CODE ENFORCEMENT During the months of November and December, Code Enforcement responded to 158 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 194 code cases, conducted 299 inspections, and forwarded 41 referrals. Type of Code Case November December Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 0 5 Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance /infestation/ Mo Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP 7 25 Trash and Debris/ Dumping Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard 3 2 Green Paol / Vector Control / Stagnant Water Graffiti 16 10 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control Trailer/RV Stored/Boat/Parking 12 2 Construction w/o Pe rm it/Bu i I d i ng Cade Encroach Public ROW/ Trash Cans S 5 Zaning/signs Public Safety & Health 0 4 Total N u m ber of Cases Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. Foreclosure Tracking November 2021 December 2021 Residential - Default 15 14 Residential - Foreclosure 1 23 21 Residential - RED 14 13 Total - Residential 52 49 Commercial - Default Commercial - Foreclosure 1 1 Commercial - REED 4 Total - Commercial 5 5 ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1435 45607 Gleneagles Ct 922-312-032 Jaime Cardenas 11/01/2021 McManus & McManus & Michael PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Associates, Inc. Associates, McManus Modifications Inc. Case Title / Description: McManus Addition MOD: a modification application for a room addition at the rear of the home and expand the garage of the current single-family residence located at 45607 Gleneagles Court. PA21-1436 33251 Corte Yaca 965-351-021 Jaime Cardenas 11/01/2021 12/27/2021 Moises Villegas PL Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Modifications Case Title / Description: 33251 Corte Yaca MOD: a modification application for a 321 square -foot building addition to the existing single-family home located at 33251 Corte Yaca. PA21-1440 32225 Temecula Pky 960-010-047 Jaime Cardenas 11/02/2021 TJ Suwanswetr REDHAWK PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 TOWNE Modifications CENTERII Case Title / Description: Walmart Expansion MOD: a Modification to a development plan for a 4,600 square foot addition on the west side of the existing Walmart located at 32225 Temecula Parkway. PA21-1442 964-640-027 Jaime Cardenas 11/02/2021 Dena Upp escrow acct WOODSIDE PL Residential Corrections CA 5074 05S Tract Product authorized Review user Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA31A HPR: Home Product Review for Planning Area 31A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for three (3) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 81 lots. PA21-1451 42200 Moraga Rd 921-310-014 Jaime Cardenas 11/04/2021 Joshua O'Fair PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 42200 Moraga ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 42200 Moraga Road. PA21-1453 42197 Margarita Rd 921-700-017 Jaime Cardenas 11/04/2021 Steve Rawlings AU ENERGY PL Conditional Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Loop Market Type 20 ABC CUP: a conditional use permit application for an ABC Type 20 (off -site beer and wine sales) for Loop Neighborhood Market located at 42197 Margarita Road. Page 1 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1454 910-272-014 Scott Cooper 11/04/2021 Adam Covington Greystar Hoff PL Out CA Investments Development Plan Case Title / Description: Jefferson/Buecking Apartments DP: A Development Plan for a 260 unit apartment community located on the north and south side of Buecking Drive at the Jefferson Avenue intersection PA21-1455 27901 Jefferson Ave , 101 921-050-003 Jaime Cardenas 11/04/2021 Burley Wright Dan Henderson PL Extension of Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Time Case Title / Description: Hendo's Barrel House EOT: a first Extension of Time permit to allow for a Conditional Use Permit for a Type 74 (Craft Distiller) and Type 23 (Small Beer Manufacturer) ABC License for the proposed brewery, distillery and restaurant to operate at 27901 Jefferson Avenue. PA21-1462 40680 Winchester Rd 910-420-029 Eric Jones 11/08/2021 Amelia Beltran Seritage PL Maps Out Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: SoCal Auto Style Parcel Creation Map: A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide an existing parcel located at 40680 Winchester Road. PA21-1463 921-330-057 Scott Cooper 11/08/2021 11/24/2021 Todd Balicki Griffin Living, PL Approved CA LLC Modifications Case Title / Description: Solana Assisted Living MOD: A Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA19-0940) to revise exterior elevations related to the location and number of windows and doors and the addition of stone material in additional areas. The project is located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and Solana Way PA21-1465 959-301-016 Eric Jones 11/08/2021 12/16/2021 John Thorpe Paseo Del Sol PL Approved CA Master Assn Modifications Case Title / Description: Paseo Del Sol Phase IV Tree Removal Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow for tree removal and replacement due to disease for Paseo Del Sol common areas. PA21-1469 28225 Heirloom Dr 916-400-035 Scott Cooper 11/10/2021 12/13/2021 Sherri Severino Meritage PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Homes Use Permit Case Title / Description: Heirloom Farms Construction Trailer TUP: A Temporary Use Permit to allow for a temporary construction trailer on site throughout the construction of Heirloom Farms PA21-1470 42660 Avenida Alvarado 909-290-052 Scott Cooper 11/10/2021 Mario Calvillo MS -Mountain PL Out Temecula, CA 92590 View, LLC Development Plan Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 12 DP: Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 38,714 square foot industrial building located on the north side of Avenida Alvarado approximately 625 feet east of Via Industria (APN: 909-290-0051, 52) Page 2 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1471 42672 Avenida Alvarado 909-290-050 Scott Cooper 11/10/2021 Mario Calvillo MS -Mountain PL Out Temecula, CA 92590 View, LLC Development Plan Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 13 DP: Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 19,727 square foot industrial building located on the north side of Avenida Alvarado approximately 350 feet east of Via Industria (APN: 909-290-050) PA21-1472 909-290-011 Scott Cooper 11/10/2021 Mario Calvillo MS -Mountain PL Plan Review CA View, LLC Development Plan Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 20 DP: Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 23,788 square foot industrial building located on the south side of Avenida Alvarado approximately 720 feet east of Via Industria (APN: 909-290-011) PA21-1487 43501 Ventana St 944-330-005 Scott Cooper 11/16/2021 Kim Berry RTA Rancho PL Temporary Out Temecula, CA 92592 Highlands, LLC Use Permit Case Title / Description: Arrive & Rancho Highlands Construction Trailer TUP: A Temporary Use Permit to allow for a temporary construction trailer on site throughout the construction of Arrive @ Rancho Highlands PA21-1492 27326 Jefferson Ave 910-282-004 Jaime Cardenas 11/17/2021 Robert Burnside Plaza Temecula PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Inc Permits Case Title / Description: Pacific Spa MEP: A Massage Establishment Permit renewal for Pacific Spa located at 27326 Jefferson Avenue. PA21-1503 28715 Las Haciendas St 921-050-016 Brandon Rabidou 11/18/2021 Rosalind Ross Community PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 HousingWorks Modifications Case Title / Description: Las Haciendas MOD: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to make minor exterior alterations to the Las Haciendas projects (previously approved under PA20-0345). PA21-1504 42649 Avenida Alvarado 909-290-010 Scott Cooper 11/18/2021 Josh Barrett MS -Mountain PL Out Temecula, CA 92590 View, LLC Modifications Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Basin 2 MOD: A Modification to Parcel Map 21382 for th, construction of a master bioretention basin on Parcel10 to serve Parcels 49 through 52 and 11 through 14 for storm water drainage and water quality purposes located on the south side of Avenida Alvarado approximately 930 feet east of Via Industria (APN: 909-290-010) PA21-1509 32909 Temecula Pky 960-030-042 Jaime Cardenas 11/19/2021 Dennis Lam PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Permits Case Title / Description: Massage Envy MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit (MEP) renewal for Massage Envy located at 32909 Temecula Parkway, Suite 105. Page 3 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1512 44638 Corte Capistrano 961-052-017 11/19/2021 Dave Madden Jeffrey Kadis PL Accessory Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Dwelling Unit Case Title / Description: Kadis ADU: an Accessory Dwelling Unit application for a proposed 850 square -foot ADU located at the rear of the existing property located at 44638 Corte Capistrano. PA21-1516 41995 Remington Ave 909-373-017 Jaime Cardenas 11/22/2021 12/28/2021 Dave Henrikson Garmon Corp PL Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Modifications Case Title / Description: Garmon Equipment Enclosure MOD: a Modification Application for a proposed 392 square foot equipment enclosure and convert 4,300 existing square feet into warehousing space. PA21-1519 28772 Calle Cortez 921-050-020 Jaime Cardenas 11/22/2021 Erin Hagy PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: Las Haciendas ZL: a zoning verification letter for the properties with associated assessor's parcel numbers 921-050-020 and 921-050-016. PA21-1520 27380 Nicolas Rd 920-100-016 Jaime Cardenas 11/22/2021 Austin Williams CHAPPARAL PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 SELF Planning Letter STORAGE PARTNERS Case Title / Description: 27380 Nicholas Road ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 27380 Nicolas Road. PA21-1522 42450 Moraga Rd 944-290-021 Jaime Cardenas 11/23/2021 Jennifer TEMECULA PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Whitehorn RIDGE LTD Modifications PARTNERSHIP Case Title / Description: Temecula Ridge Apartments Paint MOD: a modification application to change the exterior building colors of an apartment complex located at 42450 Moraga Road. PA21-1524 42353 Avenida Alvarado 909-251-016 Jaime Cardenas 11/23/2021 Charlie Pedrick PL Conditional Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Pet Crematorium CUP: a Conditional Use Permit application for a proposed pet crematorium facility located at 42353 Avenida Alvarado. Page 4 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1525 31700 Temecula Pky 959-080-026 Scott Cooper 11/24/2021 Steve Wilson HMC Architects TEMECULA PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 VALLEY Modifications HOSPITAL INC Case Title / Description: TVH Master Plan Update MOD: A Modification to the previously approved Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan. The updated Master Plan, at buildout will include the existing 237,305 square foot hospital building and 5,180 square foot storage building along with an approximately 102,000 square foot, four story Behavioral Health Building in Phase 2, an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the emergency department, a 125,000 square foot, five story second hospital tower, a 80,000 square foot medical office buildings, and a 12,600 square foot utility plant in Phase 3, and an approximately 125,000 square foot, five story third hospital tower, a 80,000 square three story foot medical office building, and a four story parking structure with the existing helipad relocated to the roof of the structure in Phase 4. The project is located at 31700 Temecula Parkway. PA21-1528 28500 Old Town Front St 922-024-008 11/24/2021 Gabriela Marks PL Minor Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Exception Case Title / Description: 28500 Old Town Front Street Minor Exception: A Minor Exception to allow for greater separation between the columns of a proposed commercial structure located at 28500 Old Town Front Street. PA21-1542 29379 Rancho California Rd 944-290-004 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Dawnn Russell PL Massage Plan Review ,200 Permits Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Dawnn Russell MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Dawnn Russell located at 29379 Rancho California Road, Suite 200. PA21-1543 27715 Jefferson Ave , 201 921-400-024 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Hilda Reyes Hilda Reyes PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Permits Case Title / Description: Ethereal Day Spa 1 MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Ethereal Day Spa 1 located at 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201. PA21-1544 41720 Winchester Rd , B 909-270-017 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Tao Guan K & K CHAE PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 DEV INC Permits Case Title / Description: Aros Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Aros Massage located at 41720 Winchester Road, Suite B. PA21-1545 28910 Rancho California Rd 921-060-024 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Qing Jie Zhou CRAIG PL Massage Plan Review 1101 NELSON Permits Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Dream Tree Spa MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Dream Tree Massage located at 28910 Rancho California Road, Suite 101. Page 5 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1546 27536 Ynez Rd , F-19 921-320-052 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Suhua Chen PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Permits Case Title / Description: Massage by Sue Sue MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Massage by Sue Sue located at 27536 Ynez Road, Suite F-19. PA21-1547 26491 Ynez Rd 910-300-018 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Lirong Ming KIMCO PALM PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 PLAZA Permits Case Title / Description: Happy Buddha Foot Reflexology Spa (Ynez) MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Happy Buddha Foot Reflexology Spa located at 26491 Ynez Road, Suite S. PA21-1548 40150 Winchester Rd , 1 920-100-034 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Lirong Ming SCOOBY DOO PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 PROP Permits Case Title / Description: Happy Buddha Foot Reflexology Spa (Winchester) MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Happy Buddha Foot Reflexology Spa located at 40150 Winchester Road, Suite 1. PA21-1550 31741 Temecula Pky, , B 961-080-022 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Jianhua Zhao Temecula New Plan Excel PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 massage Realty Trust Inc. Permits Case Title / Description: Temecula Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit application for Temecula Massage located at 31741 Temecula Parkway, Suite B. PA21-1551 27715 Jefferson Ave 921-400-024 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Yunjue Guo PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Permits Case Title / Description: Moon Bay Spa MEP: a massage establishment permit application for Moon Bay Spa located at 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 108. PA21-1560 32467 Temecula Pky 960-020-058 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Matee ORIGO REAL PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Suksunpanteep ESTATE INV Permits FUND Case Title / Description: MC Thai Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for MC Thai Massage located at 32467 Temecula Parkway; Suite F101. PA21-1561 27393 Ynez Rd , 261 921-260-018 Jaime Cardenas 11/29/2021 Shari Schock / Shari Schock / Amethyst PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Brewster Brewster Healing Touch Permits Massage Studio Case Title / Description: Amethyst Healing Touch Massage Studio MEP: a massage establishment permit to renew Amethyst Healing Touch Massage Studio located at 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 261. Page 6 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1562 26780 Ynez Ct 921-750-009 Jaime Cardenas 11/30/2021 YanYan YanYan MIKE & LEANN PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Banuelos Banuelos AZEVEDO LTD Permits PARTNERSHIP Case Title / Description: Massage Poise MEP: a massage establishment permit for Massage Poise where at least 75% of the floor area is used as a yoga studio located at 26780 Ynez Court, Suite B. PA21-1563 27725 Jefferson Ave 921-400-031 Jaime Cardenas 11/30/2021 Shu Wei Collier PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Permits Case Title / Description: Blue Water Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Blue Water Massage located at 27725 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 106. PA21-1565 27470 Jefferson Ave 910-310-008 Jaime Cardenas 11/30/2021 Min Huang M & J RAMSAY PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 CORP Permits Case Title / Description: 5 Star Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for 5 Star Massage located at 27470 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 3 PA21-1566 28061 Jefferson Ave, 204 921-060-009 Jaime Cardenas 11/30/2021 Ling Lou JEFFERSON PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 ETC Permits Case Title / Description: Zen Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Zen Massage located at 28061 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 204. PA21-1567 41892 Enterprise Cir South, 909-270-013 Jaime Cardenas 11/30/2021 WALTER ANN SAUNA Smokers Land PL Massage Plan Review F ISENBERG Inc Permits Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Ann Sauna MEP: a massage establishment permit for Ann Sauna located at 41892 Enterprise Circle South, Suite F. PA21-1568 28120 Jefferson Ave 921-060-032 Jaime Cardenas 11/30/2021 Ping He JEAN PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 DOMENIGONI Permits Case Title / Description: Spa Rejuv MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Spa Rejuv located at 28120 Jefferson Avenue, Suite B-201. PA21-1579 30680 Rancho California Rd 921-700-016 Jaime Cardenas 12/01/2021 Gary Craig PK I PALOMAR PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 VILLAGE Use Permit Case Title / Description: Gary's Strawberry Stand TUP: a Temporary Use Permit to allow a strawberry stand to be located at 30680 Rancho California Road. The stand will be open from March 1 through July 31, 2021 from 9:00 a.m. to 7 p.m. PA21-1580 29379 Rancho California Rd 944-290-004 Jaime Cardenas 12/01/2021 Paula Massie Paula PL Massage Plan Review ,207 Massage Permits Temecula, CA 92592 Massage Case Title / Description: Paula Massie Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Paula Massie Massage located at 29379 Rancho California Road, Suite 207. Page 7 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1586 27250 Madison Ave 910-272-004 Jaime Cardenas 12/02/2021 01/04/2022 Nick Vertucci BV Prop PL Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Modifications Case Title / Description: Vista Paint Solar PV: a modification application for the addition of 50 solar panels to the existing Vista Paint building located 27250 Madison Avenue. PA21-1587 42295 Avenida Alvarado 909-251-010 Jaime Cardenas 12/03/2021 Melanie PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Williams Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 42295 Avenida Alvarado, Unit 2 ZL: a zoning verification for the property located at 42295 Avenida Alvarado, Unit 2. PA21-1612 31670 Rancho California Rd 953-090-028 Eric Jones 12/13/2021 Kal Farah Kevin Purvis PL Maps Cancelled Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Racho-12 Tentative Tract Map: A Tentative Tract Map to create twelve residential lots from one existing lot. The project is located at 31670 Rancho California Road. PA21-1613 27574 Commerce Center Dr 921-400-064 Jaime Cardenas 12/13/2021 Liqin Huang Jefferson Court PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Permits Case Title / Description: Ivy Spa MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Ivy Spa located at 27574 Commerce Center Drive, Suite 138. PA21-1614 27403 Ynez Rd 921-260-019 Jaime Cardenas 12/13/2021 Sabrina Timms PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Permits Case Title / Description: Balance of Wellness MEP: a massage establishment permit application for Balance of Wellness located at 27403 Ynez Road, Suite 216. PA21-1615 27393 Ynez Rd 921-260-018 Jaime Cardenas 12/13/2021 Carol Campbell PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Permits Case Title / Description: Fusion Therapeutic Massage MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit application for Fusion Therapeutic Massage located at 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 252. PA21-1617 27645 Jefferson Ave 921-480-058 Jaime Cardenas 12/13/2021 Qirong Liu Jim Robbins PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Permits Case Title / Description: Lavender Massage MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit application for Lavender Massage located at 27646 Jefferson Avenue; Suite 104B. PA21-1618 27365 Jefferson Ave 909-270-047 Jaime Cardenas 12/13/2021 Hu Xiaoling JEFFERSON PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 AVENUE Permits TEMECULA Case Title / Description: Oasis Spa Massage MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit application for Oasis Spa Massage located at 27365 Jefferson Avenue, Suite K. Page 8 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1620 28751 Rancho California Rd 921-280-003 Jaime Cardenas 12/13/2021 Choongdae FIRST & PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Kong CENTER Permits Case Title / Description: Amore Day Spa: a Massage Establishment Permit for Amore Day Spa located at 28751 Rancho California Road, Suite 102. PA21-1621 42200 Margarita Rd 954-020-006 Jaime Cardenas 12/13/2021 Dante Russell VENTANA PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 PROP Modifications Case Title / Description: Margarita Summit Apartments MOD: a Modification Application for the removal of decks of the building's second story balconies. The project site is located at 42200 Margarita Road. PA21-1622 31891 Rancho California Rd 954-030-002 Jaime Cardenas 12/14/2021 01/04/2022 Ron Bartlo & Ron Bartlo & PL Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Associates Inc Associates Inc Modifications Case Title / Description: 31891 Rancho California Trellis MOD: a modification application for the installation of a trellis in the outdoor patio area of 31891 Rancho California Road. PA21-1625 31963 Rancho California Rd 954-030-002 Jaime Cardenas 12/15/2021 Christina PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Mikhail Modifications Case Title / Description: Wells Fargo Light MOD: a modification application to remove and replace the light fixtures of the parking lot and Wells Fargo Bank building located at 31963 Rancho California Road. PA21-1628 29489 Via Las Colinas 944-290-023 Jaime Cardenas 12/15/2021 Naomi Ngoka SUMMER PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 BREEZE DEV Planning Letter Case Title / Description: Summer Breeze Apartments ZL: a zoning verification letter for Summer Breeze Apartments located at 29489 Via Las Colinas (APN 944-290-023). PA21-1638 40497 Margarita Rd 910-470-027 Jaime Cardenas 12/15/2021 Faith Palmer NUMBER 2 PC PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: Promenade Mall Planning Area 1 ZL: a zoning verification letter for the following properties located at 40497 Margarita Road, 40531 Margarita Road, 40551 Margarita Road, and 40573 Margarita Road. PA21-1639 42081 3Rd St 922-046-012 Jaime Cardenas 12/15/2021 Tara Hood Warehouse at PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Creekside Planning Letter Case Title / Description: The Warehouse at Creekside ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 42081 3rd Street. PA21-1644 29630 Avenida Del Sol 921-140-009 Jaime Cardenas 12/17/2021 Dave Henrikson Eric Elizalde PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Modifications Case Title / Description: Elizalde Guest House: a Modification Application for a 998 square foot, two-story guest house located at 29630 Avenida Del Sol. Page 9 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-1651 41925 4Th St 922-033-016 Jaime Cardenas 12/21 /2021 Vanessa PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Narvios Modifications Case Title / Description: 41925 4th Street Fence MOD: a Modification Application for a proposed wall and wrought iron fence at the front of the existing property located at 41925 4th Street. PA21-1671 31775 De Portola Rd 959-080-035 Jaime Cardenas 12/30/2021 Kim Dunn ERR PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 31775 De Portola Road ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 31775 De Portola Road (APN 959-080-035). PA21-1672 40760 Winchester Rd , 130 910-420-030 12/30/2021 RYAN HUYNH Temecula PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Towne Center Modifications Assoc Case Title / Description: Amazon Storefront MOD: a Modification Application for a proposed storefront improvement for a future Amazon storefront store located at 40760 Winchester Road, Suite 130 PREAPP21- 28613 Pujol St 922-054-011 Jaime Cardenas 11/01/2021 12/29/2021 Kate Du PL Completed 1434 Temecula, CA 92590 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: JMK/28613 Pujol Residential Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review two proposed ten unit townhouse structure totaling approximately 8,502 square feet combined. The project is located at 28613 Pujol Street. PREAPP21- 921-281-014 Jaime Cardenas 11/02/2021 11/29/2021 Mike Bareh PL Completed 1439 CA Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Small Steps Pre-App: A Pre -Application for an approximately 8,900 square foot industrial building located on the northwest corner of Baldaray Circle. PREAPP21- 42775 Margarita Rd 945-050-014 Jaime Cardenas 11/04/2021 Jared Hermelin City of PL Plan Review 1452 Temecula, CA 92592 Temecula Pre -Application Case Title / Description: RR Sports Park Crown Castle Wireless Pre-App: a pre -application for the a proposed modification to the Crown Castle's existing wireless facility located on Ronald Reagan Sports Park located at 42775 Margarita Road. PREAPP21- 80134 Winchester Rd 920-110-005 Scott Cooper 11/18/2021 David Kross Cypress West PL Out 1499 Temecula, CA 92591 Realty Pre -Application Acquisition Company Case Title / Description: Temecula Medical Collective Pre-App: A Pre -Application for an approximately 58,000 square foot medical office building campus consisting of three buildings located at 80134 Winchester Road. Page 10 of 11 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PREAPP21- 922-100-038 Scott Cooper 12/01/2021 Jafar Monazzam PL Out 1577 CA Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Old Town Living Pre-App: A Pre -Application for an approximately 36,600 senior citizen housing project for residents 55 years of age or older located on the west side of Old Town Front Street approximately 915 feet south of Santiago Road. PREAPP21- 40575 Winchester Rd 910-290-010 Jaime Cardenas 12/03/2021 12/16/2021 Ramsey Krieps Kimley-Horn Velo PL Completed 1588 Temecula, CA 92591 Corinthians Pre -Application LTD Partnership Case Title / Description: Krispy Kreme: a proposed Tenant improvement and modification to the existing Yellow Basket Restaurant located at 40575 Winchester Road to accommodate a proposed Krispy Kreme. PREAPP21- 961-290-003 Scott Cooper 12/15/2021 Riccardo PL Plan Review 1624 CA Ferguson Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Parker Medical Gateway Pre-App: A Pre -Application for a three story medica office building with podium parking located on the west side of Avenida De Missiones approximately 540 feet south of Temecula Parkway PREAPP21- 965-400-001 Eric Jones 12/23/2021 Jim McMenamin STAGE & PL Plan Review 1660 CA DEPORTOLA Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Stage Portola Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to allow for the review of a proposed Map consisting of 139 attached and detached residential units. The project is generally located on the northeast corner of Butterfield Stage and De Portola. Page 11 of 11 Item No. 16 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (December 2021) PREPARED BY: Joseph Greco, Sergeant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for December 2021. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 6,502 "Priority One" calls for service 76 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 6.58 VOLUNTEERS Chaplain 28 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 716 Reserve officer hours (patrol) 83 Explorer 88 Station/Administration 57 Total Volunteer hours 972 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served 213 Fingerprints/Live Scans 54 Police reports filed 8 Citations signed off 10 Total receipts $2,871 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention/Neighborhood watch meetings 1 Safety presentations/Training 0 Special events 3 Residential/Business security surveys conducted 12 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0 Station Tours 0 Planning Review Projects 0 Temp Outdoor Use Permits SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM) On sight felony arrests 1 On sight misdemeanor arrests 14 Felony arrest warrants served 5 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 72 Area Checks 94 Camp Checks 75 Pedestrian Checks 40 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks 14 Outreach attempts / Success 8/4 SPECIAL TEAMS (Special Enforcement Team) On sight felony arrests 3 On sight misdemeanor arrests 30 Felony arrest warrants served 3 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 6 Follow-up investigations / search warrants 1 Parole/Probation Searches 0 Pedestrian Checks 24 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks 44 Marijuana Dispensary Checks 0 SPECIAL TEAMS (Metro District Team) On sight felony arrests 2 On sight misdemeanor arrests 14 Felony arrest warrants served 12 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 39 Bar/Business checks 250 D.U.I. Arrests 14 Traffic/Parking citations 85 Citations issued for hazardous violations 471 Non -hazardous citations 237 Parking citations 101 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 41 Seatbelts 4 Cell Phone Cites 50 Injury collisions 30 D.U.I. Arrests 39 Grant funded D.U.I. Traffic safety checkpoints / saturation enforcement 0 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket / traffic enforcement 0 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 125 Total Cases Assigned 29 Total Cases Closed 37 Search Warrants prepared/served 15 Arrests 5 Out of Custody Filings 1 1' ; i7ulil12I:�7ilu/:vilil m.30-1 Calls for service 413 Felony arrest/filings 4 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 23 Traffic Citations 26 Total customers served 557 Fingerprints/Live Scans 160 Total receipts $6,108 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests 1 Misdemeanor arrests 8 Reports 26 Citations 20 Meetings/Presentations 172 Incident summaries: Calls for Service: Officers responded to 6,502 calls for service in December 2021. Below is a snapshot of those calls. This is not a comprehensive list. Please be mindful these calls can range from several minutes to several hours, to investigate at the patrol level. Many of these investigations are forwarded to the Detective Bureau for even further investigation and follow-up. Call Type Number of Calls Call Type Number of Calls Arson 5 Hazard 11 Assault with a Deadly Weapon 7 Homeless Outreach 6 Battery (Fights) 50 Illegal Dumping 3 Burglary -Commercial 22 Indecent Exposure 3 Burglary -Residential 12 Juvenile -incorrigible 20 Burglary -Vehicle 60 Juvenile -Run Away 13 Child Abuse 11 Juvenile -Located 5 Domestic Violence Abuse 18 Juvenile -Medical Aid 12 Fraud 57 K9 Uses 44 Homicide Keep the Peace 24 Rape 3 Mail Theft 20 Robbery 4 Marijuana Cultivation Theft- PettyUnder $950 98 Mentally Disturbed Person (5150) 51 Theft -Grand (over $950) 33 Missing Adult or Child 8 Narcotics Violations 80 Person Down 28 Alarm -Audible 486 Prowler 5 Alarm -Robbery Receiving Stolen Property 1 Alarm -Silent 27 Restraining Order Violation 6 Animal Cruelty 3 Sex Offender Registrants Annoying Phone Calls 19 Sexual Battery 6 Area Checks 802 Shooting at a Dwelling 11 Assist Other Department 124 Stolen Vehicle 40 Brandishing a Firearm 5 Stolen Vehicle Recovery 5 Check the Welfare 100 Suicide threat 31 Child Stealing 31 Suspicious Person 131 Criminal Threats 2 Suspicious Vehicle 63 Disoriented Subject 6 Trespassing 97 Disturbing the Peace 323 Unattended Death 9 Drunk in Public 40 Vandalism 59 Extra Patrol Requests 43 Vehicle Embezzlement 1 Fireworks 6 Vicious Dog 3 Follow -Up Investigations/Patrol 279 Warrant Service 235 911 Calls 759 Item No. 17 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 25, 2022 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Low -Flow Crossing, PW19-15 Description: Preliminary design of the Extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz Road, including a new low -flow crossing of Murrieta Creek. Cost: $2,387,000 Status: In design until March 2022. Hydraulic, geotechnical, traffic and biological reports are complete. Preliminary design is under review. Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25 Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road. Cost: $11,457,436 Status: Phase 1 design and Phase 1 & 2 environmental studies November 2019 — October 2022. Current activities include consultant preparation of 90% PS&E, City review of several engineering and environmental studies, and coordination with utility companies. French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two-lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $137,356,246 Status: Currently in design. Environmental revalidation is complete. Right of way acquisition process is well underway. 1 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) 1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02 Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp. Cost: $8,382,225 Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — September 2022. Current activities include City revision of 95% Roadway and Structures PSE, Storm Water Data Report, Drainage Report, and Permit Engineering Evaluation Report. The 1s' Draft Environmental Document has been reviewed by Caltrans. Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South. Cost: $52,025,657 Status: Per a 3-year Landscape Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans, the City will maintain the interchange site from June 30, 2020 through June 30, 2023. The City is working with Caltrans on the relinquishment of the interchange right-of-way to the State inventory. Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. Cost: $14,307,394 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. RCA provided comments to the JPR application on 7/30/2020. NEPA approval is anticipated in Q1 of 2022, Caltrans review time has been longer than anticipated. Biological monitoring in Temecula Creek for potential mitigation site is complete as of July 2021. CEQA is pending results of Temecula Creek monitoring and review by RCA. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years. Caltrans HBP Program management has proposed reducing the curb to curb width of the bridge that is considered "participating" for grant funding purposes. Staff will address this with Caltrans HBP Program as the bridge width is the same as original approved grant application. 2 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11 Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights, and installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $1,340,400 Status: Design is at 60%. Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Rancho California Road at Tee Drive. Cost: $346,646.50 Status: Project is currently in design. Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access to the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Cost: $1,347,674 Status: City Council awarded the construction contract at the meeting on May 25, 2021. Construction started June 21, 2021. Construction completion is anticipated in March of 2022. 3 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Bike and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting Description: Project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road. Cost: $400,000 Status: Project is currently in design. Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07 Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment. Cost: $5,000,000 Status: Phase 1 design. Reviewed 100% plans. Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe. This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, irrigation, and transportation art between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange. Cost: $3,533,483 Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — June 2022. Environmental revalidation completed October 2020. Current activities include 90% design plans, design of new power and irrigation water service, and Design Engineering Evaluation Report. 4 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21 Description: Demolition and Reconstruction of New Margarita Recreation Center Building and Pool Cost: $10,656,507.91 Status: RFP responses were received on August 27, 2020. The project was re -advertised on November 25, 2020 to account for increased project budget and proposals were received on December 23, 2020. The Design - Build Contract was awarded at the March 9, 2021 City Council Meeting to De La Secura Builders, Inc., for a Guaranteed Maximum Price of $8,680,459.00. Design phase is well underway. The second building plan submittal was submitted on January 7, 2022 and is under review City Staff is currently vacating the existing MRC building which will be completed by February 11, 2022. The Fire Department is scheduled to use the building for training the week of February 14, 2022. The demolition of the existing MRC building is scheduled to start on February 22, 2022. It is anticipated building construction will be complete in January 2023 with a grand opening in Spring 2023. Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13 Description: The project includes the enhancement and renovation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. Work includes new exterior siding, painting, replacement of perimeter soffits, fascia boards, eaves, and select doors & windows. Cost: $1,000,000 Status: In design. Reviewed 90% plans. Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail. Cost: $6,288,595 Status: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. The Notice to Proceed for construction was issued to the contractor with a work start date of April 19, 2021. Groundbreaking event occurred on May 4, 2021. Completion is anticipated in March of 2022. 5 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing, PW19-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the undercrossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location. Cost: $2,716,764 Status: The project is in design. 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PSE) expected in April 2022. Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road. Cost: $198,920 Status: Project is currently in design. Sidewalks — DLR Drive, PW19-18 Description: New sidewalks on the north and west side of DLR Drive. Cost: $442,077 Status: Project is currently in design. Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road. Cost: $467,403 Status: Project is currently in design. 11 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02 Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side Fifth Street, between Front Street and Murrieta Creek. Improvements include grind/overlay of entire street, tree grates, bollards, streetlights. Cost: $159,267.30 Status: Construction is complete. Citywide — Slurry Seal, PW21-01 Description: Construction involves roadway preparation by removal of existing striping and pavement markings, cleaning the roadway surface and sealing cracks. This is followed by application of slurry seal and subsequent restoration of striping and pavement markings. The project consists of slurry sealing over 7 million square feet of residential roadway throughout Temecula Cost: $1,546,980.04 Status: Project is complete. 7 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site. Cost: $1,280,284 Status: The environmental document, CEQA IS/MND, was approved at the July 27, 2021 Council Meeting. Project was advertised for bids between September 9, 2021 and October 7, 2021. Bids were opened on 10/07/2021. Construction contract was awarded at the 10/26/2021 City Council meeting. Construction is underway with anticipated completion by March 1, 2022. Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Butterfield Stage Park and Vail Ranch Park. Cost: $1,127,800 Status: Project is currently in design. Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks. Cost: $800,000 Status: An RFP is being prepared for the design, purchase & installation for three playground project sites — Redhawk Community Park, Long Canyon Creek Park & Temecula Creek Park. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of a new restroom building, including additional stalls and urinals, a large snack bar and a dedicated storage case. Cost: $1,120,000 Status: Project is currently in design. Construction is anticipated in Winter 2022. 8 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT January 25, 2022 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS Hilton Garden Inn Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 66,991 square foot, three-story, 104 room Hilton Garden Inn Hotel with underground parking and additional off -site parking located approximately north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. Status: Permit issued October 4, 2019. Ongoing review of project by the Land Development division. Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch) Description: Land Development oversight of the following submittals in plan check: Final Map reviews, Community Sports Park Improvement Plan, Sommers Bend — Rough Grading Plan; Street Improvement Plan; Storm Drain Improvement Plan; Street Light Plan; Signing & Striping Plan. Status: Grading Permit issued September 27, 2018. The Loop Road (Sommers Bend) is completely paved with streetlights installed. The Community Sports Park has kicked off construction in June 2020. Models in three tracts are under construction. The Sommers Bend recreation center is also under construction. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Models are open. Production homes are under construction. Temecula Village Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of a 160-unit apartment community located on the south side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Drive. Status: Permit issued June 27, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Traffic signal has been installed at Via Portofino. p] REQUEST TO SPEAK FORMS. ELECTRONIC COMMENTS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD G Public Comment: Non-Agendized Item: Agenda Item No. For ❑ REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Agendized Item: ❑ Against Date: 1— Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: 17 l'J /7C� Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 8:27 AM To: Latina Association Subject: FW: Item 11 Public Comment Redistricting January 25 2022 Attachments: Item 11 Redistricting Public Comment 25 January 2022 Temecula City Concil.pdf Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl(a temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Latina Association < Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:37 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Item 11 Public Comment Redistricting January 25 2022 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Randi, I'm enclosing a pdf with my public comment for Redistricting Thank you, Martha Angelica Howard Latina Association of Riverside County, President LULAC Council 3190 Member Former Temecula City Council District 5 Candidate Temecula Woman of the Year NAACP-W.I.N. Latina Association Riverside County "To make a difference through engaging in public policy, education, and culture affirmation. " https://www.facebook.com/papes/Lati na-Association-of-Riverside-Cou nty/209501775871863 Martha Howard January 25, 2022 City Council Item 11 Redistricting the City of Temecula I find it important to provide a background for my comment as follows: Although the council approved on September 28, 2021, to meet for a redistricting workshop with the REDI Commission, the council and community members the city retracted from its promise stating that minimal community participation was not worth the consultant's fees adding also the present in - person health concerns. We certainly don't dispute the in -person meeting; however, we could have had a zoom meeting, but the city clerk following administrative advice did not provided such option. Let me further elaborate by mentioning, that since 2017 we had acted and participated in good faith and reason requesting the previous and present council to include community involvement beyond public comments. When the city overlooks our past five years of engaging as "minimal participation," it oversimplifies our efforts and the communities of interest we represent. Unfortunately, faith and reasons were betrayed by your abuse of legislative power; therefore, even with all the obstacles the city placed on us we submitted to the Demographer and council members a modified map from the city's Draft A. We created this map with the technical collaboration from MALDEF (Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund). This map meets the CVAP (California Voting Age Population) of 50% plus for District 5, and potentially before next redistricting for District 1 and 3, that a majority minority would elect a member of their choice within their community. This map meets population, contiguous, and preserves communities of interest such as Latino population who share socioeconomic and cultural commonalities. For example, District 5 has the largest Latino population and the largest multi -dwelling residence; in addition, the residents are the working force who elevate our tourism industry providing customer, food, and entertainment services. It only makes sense to adopt Draft A Modified Map we are presenting to you tonight. Thank you. From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 4:53 PM To: Ira Robinson Subject: Public Comment for 1-25-22 - Item #11 Attachments: 2618_001.pdf Thank you for your comments dropped off at City Hall. They were received and will be read into the record at the next meeting pursuant to Council policy. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randiJohl(a.temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Randi, Enclosed are my comments on tonight's Item 11. My computer won't let me forward it. If I don't make the meeting, please read them into the record, I'll record it and watch on TV. Thanks. Ira (01/25/2022) CITY OLZRM mvr. Comments on January 25,2022 Agenda item 11 (Redistricting) "- CITY CLIRKS DEPT. Mr. Mayor, Members of Council and Staff: Once again, this is a plea for meaningful and substantial public involvement in Temecula's current redistricting process. As I understand it, the law requiring certain local governing bodies to change from at -large to by -district elections was enacted primarily to make it easier for citizens who are members of a "protected class" to elect candidates of their choice. Under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, a protected class includes citizens of any race or color, and members of any "language minority group". A "language minority group" includes persons who are American Indian, Asian American, Alaskan Natives or of Spanish heritage. Given the primary intent of the law, a number of Temecula residents and I have been continuously pushing the City to permit the full involvement of protected class members and the general public with the City's hired demographer and City staff in the redistricting process. How does it make sense to exclude the primary intended beneficiaries of the law from the process? In 2017, the City in response to what it claimed to be an imminent threat of costly litigation decided to make the required change from at -large elections to elections by district. Despite our request that the city encourage and permit full public involvement in the line drawing process, the public was limited to choosing between three maps prepared by a City hired demographer who essentially worked free of public involvement or oversight. On September 28, 2021, the Council held its second of four scheduled public hearings concerned with redistricting. The third hearing was scheduled for today, January 25, 2022. A fourth public hearing is scheduled for March 8, with adoption of the final map by April 17 being the hope. Following comments from then Mayor Edwards, members of Council, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the then Chair of the REDI Commission and the demographer, the City Clerk summed up the discussion as follows: "We'll go ahead and move forward with the general direction from the Council to do a public workshop of sorts with the REDI Commission as well as the demographer over the next few months. And we'll try to schedule that prior to the January hearing." Following the September 28 meeting, not a word was said by the City to the public or to us about the agreed upon public workshop or a proposed date, time and place for such a session. Then, on January 18, 2022, the City Clerk forwarded an email message to Ms. Howard and me which said among other things: III "Unfortunately due to ongoing COVID concerns, the lack of availability of the consultants for additional in -person gatherings, and the limited expressed interest by the community, we will not be able to hold an additional workshop between now and the conclusion of our redistricting process. " In other words, during the 112 days that followed the September 28 hearing, absolutely nothing was said or done to make the agreed upon workshop happen. The good news in all of this is that over the 82 days remaining between now and April 17, there should be time for the City to do what was decided upon over four months ago. It is respectfully recommended and requested that the Council use the time remaining between now and then to right the ship and give the people a chance. COVID will soon be a memory, but the new districts will be with us for the next 10 years. Let's get it right this time. Thank you for allowing me to present these comments. Ira Robinson (01/25/2022) PS: If there is time for additional comments: 1. The City did a much better job with its 2016 promotion of Measure S, a voter approved sales tax measure that delivers to the City an additional revenue windfall of well in excess of $20 million a year. 2. In connection with the City Clerk's mention of "little expressed interest by the community ", the question is: Without any announcement, date, time or place for a public workshop, what could we have done to promote it? 3. In connection with the meetings reportedly held at each of the five board or commission meetings, it should be noted that those meetings were reported at the September 28 meeting. 07A011le 2021=2023 WORK PLAN LAYING THE FOUNDATION It is evident that the current members and officers of the EDC have worked hard to build a foundation to launch an effective and successful economic development organization. To maintain that excitement and momentum, it will be essential that we continue to foster collaboration and participation in the process. It is my belief that the most successful economic development efforts are where everyone has a role to play. Building awareness around our mission will help us bring more members to the table and help us be more successful in our business recruitment efforts. Ater, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COALITION 4 valley of Innovation THE WORK PLAN This work plan will serve as a guide for' staff, officers, and members as we work to strengthen the economy of the Southwest Riverside region by focusing our efforts on our mission of promoting the region to stimulate business growth. Business recruitment takes time. The average project from the first point of contact to the groundbreaking takes 2 years, and not all projects make it that far. It is important that while we work on those projects, we are creating meaningful deliverables along the way. It is intended that this plan will be referenced throughout the year and also used as a building block for the coming year. We'll reflect on our success and areas for growth and keep our eyes on the vision of a thriving Valley of Innovation. STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 1 FIRST 30 DAYS Meet with all local city and county offices. Begin a dialogue on goals and priorities. • Schedule meetings with all current EDC members. Gain an understanding of their reasons for supporting the organization. • Meet with each EDC officer. Identify organizations that have been previously approached about membership and any that have expressed interest. • Schedule opportunities to speak with local groups such as Chambers, Rotary Clubs, etc, to share what the EDC does and why it's important to the region • Develop a target list for new members. Current industries that are underrepresented include: Banks, Title Companies, Telecom, Car Dealerships, Construction. 2 FIRST 60 DAYS • Develop new social media strategy. Emphasize original content, increase engagement & reach. FIRST 60 DAYS CONT. Connect with the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development. Gain an understanding of incentive programs and the flow of RFI's for recruitment projects. • Work with local governments and brokers to identify tops sites for development/redevelopment. Meet with potential members that were identified in first 30 days. • Meet with regional Higher Education and Training providers to gain a better understanding of the talent pipeline. • Reach out to Site Selectors that I have a relationship with to let them know about my move and the opportunities in the Southwest Riverside County region. #ValleyofInnovation STRATEGIC INITIATIVES continued 3 FIRST 6 MONTHS • Develop Site Selector Newsletter. Highlight available sites, talent pipeline, new business announcements. • Develop clear branding for the region. Begin planning for FAM tour. Ideally, 3 site selectors focused on: Life Sciences, Food & Beverage, Pharmaceuticals, and Corporate Office. • Continue to develop and foster partnerships and collaborations with regional and statewide organizations YEAR • Develop marketing collateral for sites and communities. Develop member testimonials & elevator pitches for why they believe in the EDC and its mission Develop a staff training program to expand the capacity of the organization. • Develop a membership & engagement committee focused on bridging gaps in membership & participation. • Deliver ROI that shows investment • Hold first F • Continue tc partnership regional an • Develop marketing collateral for sites and communities. 2021-2023 VALLEY OF INNOVATION STRATEGIC INITIATIVES continued 1 YEAR CONT. • Expand 1/2 time admin position to full time. Added duties include social media, website maintenance, member communication. Provide training & mentorship in economic development best practices. Identify members who are currently at Executive & Business level memberships that can increase their giving. 5 18 MONTHS-2 YEARS • Begin planning for the 2nd annual FAM tour. • Create targeted outreach to businesses in the San Diego, LA areas for business recruitment. • Leverage the activities of statewide agencies to promote the region (trade missions, trade shows, etc) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COALITION Valley of Innovation J CONCLUSIO "A goal without a plan is just a wish." Antoine de Saint-Exupery Successful economic development takes the collaborative efforts of a whole region. The partnership between public and private organizations and higher education is key to successfully grow a region and sustaining economic development activities. Assisting local businesses in their expansion efforts, developing relationships with site selectors and State recruitment officers, and fundraising are the three most critical efforts that the staff and officers will need to focus on in the coming years. The Southwest Riverside County region has many assets and opportunities. With the right targeted approach, those will yield an even stronger economy. 2021-2023 VALLEY OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS The Attorney General of California has prepared the following circulating title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure: (21-0016A1.) PROVIDES THAT LOCAL LAND -USE AND ZONING LAWS OVERRIDE CONFLICTING STATE LAWS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Provides that city and county land -use and zoning laws (including local housing laws) override all conflicting state laws, except in certain circumstances related to three areas of statewide concern: (1) the California Coastal Act of 1976; (2) siting of power plants; or (3) development of water, communication, or transportation infrastructure projects. Prevents state legislature and local legislative bodies from passing laws invalidating voter -approved local land -use or zoning initiatives. Prohibits state from changing, granting, or denying funding to local governments based on their implementation of this measure. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Fiscal effects of the measure depend on future decisions by the cities and counties and therefore are unknown. To the Honorable Secretary of State of California We, the undersigned, registered, qualified voters of California, residents of County (or City and County), hereby propose amendments to the Constitution of California and petition the Secretary of State to submit the same to the voters of California for their adoption or rejection at the next succeeding general election or at any special statewide election held prior to that general election or as otherwise provided by law. The proposed constitutional amendments read as follows: SECTION 1. The people of the State of California find and declare all of the following: (a) The circumstances and envi- ronmental impacts of local land use decisions vary greatly across the state from locality to locality. (b) The infrastructure required to maintain appropriate levels of public services, including police and fire services, parklands and public open spaces, transportation, water supply, schools, and sewers varies greatly across the state from locality to local- ity. (c) Land use decisions made by local officials must balance devel- opment with public facilities and services while addressing the eco- nomic, environmental, and social needs of the particular communities served by those local officials. (d) Thus, it is in the best interests of the state and local communities for these complex decisions to be made at the local level to ensure that the specific, unique characteristics, constraints, and needs of those com- munities are properly analyzed and addressed. (e) Gentrification of housing adjacent to public transportation will reduce or eliminate the avail- ability of low or very low income housing near public transit, resulting in the loss of access by low or very low income persons to public transit, declines in pub- lic transit ridership, and increases in vehicle miles travelled. (f) The State Legislature cannot properly assess the impacts upon each community of sweeping centralized and rigid state land use rules and zon- ing regulations that apply across the state without regard to community im- pacts and, as a result, statewide land use and zoning will do great harm to local communities with differing circumstances and concerns. (g) Community development should not be controlled by state planners, but by local governments that know and can address the needs of, and the impacts upon, local communities. Local initiatives approved by vot- ers pertaining to land use and zoning restrictions should not be nullified or superseded by the actions of any local or state legislative body. (h) Numerous state laws that target communities for elimination of zon- ing standards have been enacted, and continue to be proposed, that eliminate or erode local control over local development and circumvent the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), creating the potential for harmful environmental impacts to occur. (i) The purpose of this measure is to ensure that all decisions regard- ing local land use controls, includ- ing zoning law and regulations, are made by the affected communities in accordance with applicable law, including but not limited to CEQA (Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.), the California Fair Employ- ment and Housing Act (Government Code §§ 12900 — 12996), prohibitions against discrimination (Government Code § 65008), and affirmatively furthering fair housing (Government Code § 8899.50). This constitutional amendment would continue to pro- vide for state control in the coastal zone, the siting of a power plant that can generate more than 50 megawatts of electricity, or the development or construction of water, communication or transportation infrastructure proj- ects which the Legislature declares are matters of statewide concern and are in the best interests of the state. For purposes of this measure, it is the intent that a transportation infrastruc- ture project shall not include a transit - oriented development project that is residential, commercial, or mixed -use. SECTION 2. Section 4.5 is added to Article XI of the California Constitu- tion, to read: SEC. 4.5. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), in the event of a conflict with a state statute, a county charter provision, general plan, spe- cific plan, ordinance or a regulation adopted pursuant to a county charter, that regulates the zoning, development or use of land within the boundaries of an unincorporated area of the county shall be deemed a county affair within the meaning of Section 4 and shall prevail over a conflicting state statute. No voter approved local initiative that regulates the zoning, development or use of land within the boundaries of any county shall be overturned or otherwise nullified by any legislative body. (b) A county charter provision, gen- eral plan, specific plan, ordinance or a regulation adopted and applicable to an unincorporated area within a county, may be determined only by a court of competent jurisdiction, in accordance with Section 4, to address either a matter of statewide concern or a county affair if that provision, ordinance, or regulation conflicts with a state statute with regard to only the following: (1) The California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Re- sources Code), or a succes- sor statute. (2) The siting of a power generating facility capable of generating more than 50 megawatts of electricity and the California Public Utili- ties Commission has deter- mined that a need exists at that location that is a matter of statewide concern. (3) The development or construction of a water, com- munication or transportation infrastructure project for which the Legislature has declared in statute the reasons why the project addresses a matter of statewide concern and is in the best interests of the state. For purposes of this paragraph, a transportation infrastructure project does not include a transit -oriented development project, whether residential, commercial, or mixed -use. (c) No modification to appro- priations for state funded programs shall occur, and no state grant applications or funding shall be denied as a result of the applica- tion of this section. No benefit or preference in state appropriations or grants shall be given to an entity that opts not to utilize the provi- sions of this section. (d) The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not af- fect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. SECTION 3. Section 5.5 is added to Article XI of the California Constitu- tion, to read: SEC. 5.5. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), in the event of a conflict with a state statute, a city charter provision, general plan, spe- cific plan, ordinance or a regulation adopted pursuant to a city charter, that establishes land use policies or regulates zoning or development standards within the boundaries of the city shall be deemed a municipal affair within the meaning of Section 5 and shall prevail over a conflicting state statute. No voter approved local initiative that regulates the zoning, development or use of land within the boundaries of any city shall be overturned or otherwise nullified by any legislative body. (b) A city charter provision, general plan, specific plan, ordinance or a regulation adopted pursuant to a city charter, may be determined only by a court of competent jurisdiction, in accordance with Section 5, to ad- dress either a matter of statewide concern or a municipal affair if that provision, ordinance, or regulation conflicts with a state statute with re- gard to only the following: (1) The California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000) of the Public Re- sources Code), or a succes- sor statute. generating facility capable of generating more than 50 megawatts of electricity and the California Public Utili- ties Commission has deter- mined that a need exists at that location that is a matter of statewide concern. (3) The development or construction of a water, com- munication or transportation infrastructure project for which the Legislature has declared in statute the reasons why the project addresses a matter of statewide concern and is in the best interests of the state. For purposes of this paragraph, a transportation infrastructure project does not include a transit -oriented development project, whether residential, commercial, or mixed -use. (c) No modification to appro- priations for state funded programs shall occur, and no state grant applications or funding shall be denied as a result of the applica- tion of this section. No benefit or preference in state appropriations or grants shall be given to an entity that opts not to utilize the provi- sions of this section. (d) The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not af- fect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. SECTION 4. Section 7 of Article XI of the California Constitution is amended to read: SEC. 7. La,) A county or city may make and enforce within its lim- its all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not that are not. except as provided in subdivision (h in conflict with general laws. A coun , or city mU not supersede or otherwise interfere with any voter approved local initia- tive pertaining to land use or zoning_ restrictions. (2) The siting of a power 2 (b) A county or city general plan specific plan ordinance or re ula- provision or application tion that regulates the zoning,- de-velopment or use of land within the boundaries of the coun1y or city shall prevail over conflicting_ eneral laws, except for only the following - (A) A coastal land use plan ordinance or regulation that conflicts with the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Sec- tion 30000) of the Public Re- sources Code) or a successor statute. Q An ordinance or regula- tion that addresses the sitin of a power generating facility capable of generating more than 50 megawatts of electric- ity and the California Public Utilities Commission has determined that a need exists at that location that is a matter of statewide concern (C) An ordinance or re ula- tion that addresses the de- velopment or construction of a water, communication or transportation infrastruc- ture project for which the Legislature has declared in statute the reasons why the project addresses a matter of statewide concern and is in the best interests of the state For purposes of this sub- paragraph, a transportation infrastructure project does not include a transit -oriented development project whether residential, commercial,or mixed -use. (c) No modification tc app opria- tions for state funded programs shall occur, and no state grant applications or funding shall be denied as a result of the application of this section No benefit or preference in state appro- priations or grants shall be given to an entity that opts not to utilize the provi- sions of this section. (d) The provisions of this subdivision are severable. If any provision of this subdivision or its application is held invalid. that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS The Attorney General of California has prepared the following circulating title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure: (21-0016A1.) PROVIDES THAT LOCAL LAND -USE AND ZONING LAWS OVERRIDE CONFLICTING STATE LAWS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Provides that city and county land -use and zoning laws (including local housing laws) override all conflicting state laws, except in certain circumstances related to three areas of statewide concern: (1) the California Coastal Act of 1976; (2) siting of power plants; or (3) development of water, communication, or transportation infrastructure projects. Prevents state legislature and local legislative bodies from passing laws invalidating voter -approved local land -use or zoning initiatives. Prohibits state from changing, granting, or denying funding to local governments based on their implementation of this measure. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Fiscal effects of the measure depend on future decisions by the cities and counties and therefore are unknown. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SEE AN "OFFICIAL TOP FUNDERS" SHEET. THIS PETITION MAY BE CIRCULATED BY A PAID SIGNATURE GATHERER OR A VOLUNTEER. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASK. THE PROPONENTS OF THIS PROPOSED INITIATIVE MEASURE HAVE THE RIGHT TO WITHDRAW THIS PETITION AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE MEASURE QUALIFIES FOR THE BALLOT. All signers of this petition must be registered to vote in This column for g P g County. ffi ' I I 1. o cta use on y Residence Print Name: Address ONLY: Signature: City: 2. Residence Print Name: Address ONLY: Signature: City: 3. Residence Print Name: Address ONLY: Signature: City: 4. Residence Print Name: Address ONLY: Signature: City: 5. Residence Print Name: Address ONLY: Signature: City: 6. Residence Print Name: Address ONLY: Signature: City: 7. Residence Print Name: Address ONLY: Signature: City. 8' Residence Print Name: Address ONLY: Signature: City: DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR (To be completed in circulator's own hand after the above signatures have been obtained.) 1, (print name) am 18 years of age or older. - My residence address is . I circulated this section of the petition (address, city, state, zip) and witnessed each of the appended signatures being written. Each signature on this petition is, to the best of my information and belief, the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. All signatures on this document were obtained between the dates of and (month, day, year) (month, day, year) I showed each signer a valid and unfalsified "Official Top Funders" sheet. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on at CA. (month, day, year) (place of signing) Signature of Circulator (complete signature indicating full name of circulator) Supplemental Material Item No. 11 – Conduct Public Hearing for the Purposes of Redistricting in the City of Temecula City of Temecula Draft Maps January 25, 2022 Shalice Tilton, Sr. Consultant National Demographics Corporation 2 Redistricting Process 2 Step Description Two Initial Hearings Aug. 24 & Sept 28 Held prior to release of draft maps. Education and to solicit input on the communities in the Districts. Census Data Release Aug. 12 Census Bureau released official 2020 Census population data in legacy format. California Data Release Late Sept / Early Oct. California Statewide Database releases California’s official ‘prisoner- adjusted’ 2020 redistricting data, then mandated three-week waiting period for City or City’s consultant to release NDC. Two Draft Map Hearings Jan. 25 & Mar. 8 Two Public Hearings to discuss and revise the draft maps and to discuss the election sequence. Map Adoption By Apr. 17 Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption. Map adopted via ordinance. 3 Equal Population Federal Voting Rights Act No Racial Gerrymandering Minimize voters shifted to different election years Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office Future population growth Preserving the core of existing districts 1. Federal Laws 2. California Criteria for Cities 1.Geographically contiguous 2.Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (Socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together) 3.Easily identifiable boundaries 4.Compact (Do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people) Prohibited: “Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party.” 3. Other Traditional Redistricting Principles 3 Redistricting Rules and Goals 4 Category Field 1 2 3 4 5 Total Total Population 23,367 21,948 20,114 22,242 22,568 110,239 Population Deviation 1,319 -100 -1,934 194 520 3,253 Pct. Deviation 5.98%-0.45%-8.77%0.88%2.36%14.75% Total 14,927 14,452 14,212 15,430 15,196 74,217 Hisp 22%26%22%22%29%24% NH White 55%57%64%65%49%58% NH Black 4%6%5%5%8%6% Asian/Pac.Isl.17%11%8%8%14%12% Native Amer.2%1%1%1%1%1% City of Temecula - Existing Districts 2020 Census Citizen Voting Age Pop •District 3 is under-populated by 8.77% •District 1 is over-populated by 5.98% •Total deviation 14.75% •Highest Latino CVAP 29% in D5; D5 is majority-minority 5 •Minimal Change for Population Balance •No Council Pairings •Deviation 5.70% •Highest Latino CVAP 29% in D5; D5 is majority-minority at 51% •D3 southern boundary moves southerly to follow de Portola Rd. between Margarita Rd and Meadows Pkwy •D2 southern boundary to include a portion of the Red Hawk Golf Course and the homes west of Tiburcio Drive (Golf Clubhouse). 6 •Minimal Change for Population Balance •No Council Pairings •Deviation 6.36% •Highest Latino CVAP 29% in D5; D5 is majority-minority at 51% •D3 southern boundary moves southerly to entirely follow de Portola Rd. •D2 southern boundary moves southerly to Temecula Creek to include Pechanga Drive and Cupeno Ln. 7 •Follows Neighborhood HOAs •No Council Pairings. •Deviation 2.49% •Highest Latino CVAP 27% in D5 •D3 moves northerly to include all Temeku Hills/Chardonnay Hills, northern border follows Serena Way •D4 moves northwesterly to pick up all Winchester Creek Campos Verdes Roripaugh Hills, mostly follows Margarita Rd. D4 moves south to pick up all of Woodcrest/Rancho Del Sol/Costain Signet/Villages. •D2 picks up Crowne Hill. D2 extends westerly to include area around Temecula Community Park •D5 picks up Starlight Ridge/Lake Village/Alta Vista 8 •Submitted by Martha Howard. •Two Pairings in District 2 •Deviation 1.22% •Highest Latino CVAP 31% in D5 •District 5 is majority-minority at 54% 9 10 11 Proposed Sequencing 11 Election Year 2022: Districts 1, 3, 5 Election Year 2024: Districts 2, 4 After focus maps are identified, it is recommended the City Council review and, if needed, adjust the district number assignments. 12 Public Hearing & Discussion 12 Public hearing to receive input on draft maps. Goal to identify 1-2 focus maps. Review and adjust the district assignments on the focus maps, if needed. Council can request variations be drawn on the focus map(s). All the maps and the full demographic summaries can be viewed on the website at https://temeculaca.gov/1172/Redistricting- Information The best way to view the maps in detail is through the interactive map viewer at this link: https://arcg.is/Ob0j4