Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout101221 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 12, 2021 - 7:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 6:00 P.M. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. The City and the owner of the Warehouse at Creekside, Keith Shibou, are involved in a dispute concerning their respective interpretations of the loan documents and the regulatory agreement for the Project that might result in litigation. See Keith Shibou's letter to the City Council of September 23, 2021. Attachments: Closed Session - Letter Dated September 23, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards INVOCATION: TBD FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Proclamation for Toastmasters Month Proclamation for Domestic Violence Month Proclamation for National Cybersecurity Awareness Month Proclamation for National Manufacturing Month Certificate of Recognition for Bob Sher, Retiring Southwest Manufacturing Council Member BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission, Old Town Local Review Board and Planning Commission Page 1 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Attachments: Agenda Report 2. Approve Action Minutes of September 28, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of September 28, 2021. Attachments: Action Minutes Page 2 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Attachments RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands 4. Adopt Ordinance 2021-04 Amending Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.04.030 to Prohibit Conduct at City Council and Other Public Meetings that Actually Disrupts, Disturbs or Otherwise Impedes the Orderly Conduct of Meetings (Second Reading) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2021-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT CONDUCT AT CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS THAT ACTUALLY DISRUPTS, DISTURBS OR OTHERWISE IMPEDES THE ORDERLY CONDUCT OF MEETINGS Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance 5. Authorize a City Sponsorship to Support the Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country and Temecula Valley Horsemen's Association at the January 1, 2022 Pasadena Tournament of Roses (Rose Parade) At the Request of Subcommittee Members Mayor Edwards and Council Member Stewart Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to provide a City Sponsorship that supports the Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country and Temecula Valley Horsemen's Association in the amount of $10,000 for expenses associated with the January 1, 2022 Pasadena Tournament of Roses (Rose Parade); and 2. Appropriate $10,000 from the undesignated General Fund balance to the Economic Development line -item account within the Economic Page 3 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 Development Department Budget. Attachments: Agenda Report Press Release LogoImages 6. Amend the Capital Improvement Program CIP) for Fiscal Years 2022-26 to Add the Traffic Signal - Promenade Mall Ring Road Project and Approve the Appropriation of Measure "S" Funds Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2022-26 TO ADD THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PROMENADE MALL RING ROAD PROJECT AND APPROVE THE APPROPRIATION OF MEASURE "S" FUNDS 2. Approve the appropriation of $300,000 from Measure "S". Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Project Description Project Location 7. Approve Tract Map 37509 (Located at the Southwest Corner of Date Street and Ynez Road) Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve Tract Map 37509 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; and 2. Approve the Subdivision Improvement and Monumentation Agreements with the Developer; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City. Attachments: Agenda Report Fees and Securities Report Vicinity Map Tract Map No. 37509 Page 4 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 5 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 8. Approve Action Minutes of September 28, 2021 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of September 28, 2021. Attachments: Action Minutes CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS Page 6 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, October 26, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 7 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. For all Public Hearings each speaker is limited to five minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. At Public Hearings involving land use matters the property owner or the applicant/property owner has the burden of proof and, therefore, shall be allowed fifteen (15) minutes for an initial presentation and an additional ten (10) minutes for rebuttal by its development team following other comments on the matter. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the property owner or applicant. An appellant, other than the property owner or applicant, and the spokesperson for an organized group of residents residing within the noticed area of the property, which is the subject of the Public Hearing, shall be allowed fifteen (15) minutes to present the appellant's position to the Council. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the appellant. All other members of the public may speak during the Public Hearing for a maximum period five (5) minutes each. Deferral of one speaker's time to another is not permitted. In the event there is a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 9. Adopt a Resolution to Approve the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update (6th Cam)and an Update to the Public Safety Element (Long Range Planning Project Number LR18-1620) Recommendation That the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND UPDATES TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR18-1620) AND APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Page 8 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 NO. 2021-01 TO THE GENERAL PLAN Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution 2021-2029 Housing Element Update 2021-2029 Housing Element Update (Appendices) Public Safety Element Updates General Plan Addendum No. 2021-01 Senate Bill 99 Analysis Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-28 Public Correspondence Notice of Public Hearing DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS (Receive and File) 10. City Council Travel/Conference Report Attachments: Agenda Report Itinerary CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS Any Council Member, including the Mayor, may request an item be placed on a future agenda. Any such request will be discussed under this section. In making the request, a Council Member may briefly describe the topic of the proposed agenda item and any timing associated with the placement of the item on the agenda. This description shall not exceed three (3) minutes unless extended by a majority vote of the City Council. No substantive discussion on the subject of the motion may occur. General discussion amongst the City Council on items listed under this section of the agenda shall be limited to 15 minutes. Items may only be placed on the agenda by Council Members pursuant to policy or by the City Manager based on administrative or operational needs of the City. Public comments on the placement of these agenda items shall be limited to a maximum of 30 minutes. Individual comments shall not exceed three (3) minutes. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings and Agenda Placements by Council Members adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. Page 9 City Council Agenda October 12, 2021 ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, October 26, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 10 //RWG October 8, 2021 City Council City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Peter M. Thorson T 213.626.8484 F 213.626.0078 F pthorson@rwglaw.com Re: Closed Session Potential Litigation October 12, 2021 Council Meeting -- Warehouse at Creekside Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: 350 South Grand Avenue 37th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 rwglaw.com On October 12, 2021, the Council the following matter will be discussed in closed session: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. The City and the owner of the Warehouse at Creekside, Keith Shibou, are involved in a dispute concerning their respective interpretations of the loan documents and the regulatory agreement for the Project that might result in litigation. See Keith Shibou's letter to the City Council of September 23, 2021. Attached is Mr. Shibou's letter to the City Council of September 23, 2021. In my opinion, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Peter M. Thorson Attachment Los Angeles San Francisco Orange County Temecula Central Coast City Council October 8, 2021 cc: Aaron Adams Kevin Hawkins Luke Watson 11086-0001\2579887v1.doc Page 1 2 September 23, 2021 Mayor Maryann Edwards and Temecula City Council Temecula, California RE: The Warehouse at Creekside LP Proposed Sale of 42801 Third Street Temecula CA 92590 Mr. Luke Watson has advised that the City of Temecula, ("the city") has concerns regarding the amount of Loan for which the prospective buyers are requesting "the city" to approve. We understand his concern is based on the wording of Section 7 of a Loan Commitment letter dated August 12, 2008. (Exhibit A), which states in part: "(ii) the principal; amount shall not exceed an amount which, when added to the Agency's Permanent Loan is 100% of the value of the Project upon completion". According to Mr. Watson's interpretation, based on a current value of $7,000,000, (Exhibit B) the maximum allowable loan could only be $1,000,000, ($7,000,000 value minus $6,000,000 "RDA" Grant) This int�retati®n_ is abs )Iutely incorrect The original loan to which the Commitment Letter refers was negotiated for the sole purpose of providing collateral to the Construction Lender's interim financing. The Redevelopment Agency's ("RDA") loan was subsequently converted to a Grant on February 9, 2009. (Details are provided later in this Brief). This fact is also unquestionably verified by the details provided in this Brief). Accordingly, the calculation as to the principal amount allowed under the above stated Commitment Letter should not include the 6,000,000 Grant. When the present Owners purchased the property in 2011, they re9led on the fact that the Redevelopment Agency's ("RDA") funding of $6,000,000 was a Grant not a Loan. 2707 BONITA CIRCLE -PALM SPRINGS CA. 92264 - PH 760-325-1214 -FAX 760-320-6497 MEMBERS: AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ISRAELI INSTITUTE OF CERTIFilED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Accordingly, they were able to purchase the property with a $3,000,000 bank loan and the "RDA" subrogated their Grant of $6,000,000 to the Bank's first trust deed. Further, when the present Owners renewed the bank loan in 2016, they again relied on the fact that the $6,000,000 was a Grant and not a loan. This understanding was confirmed by the actions of "the RDA". The property when purchased in 2011 was worth no more than $4,000,000 as construction had not been completed. Later, in 2016 on the loan renewal date the property was appraised by the Commercial Bank for $5,000,000. At both loan dates the combined Bank loan and Grant exceeded 100% of the value of the property. But "the city" approved the financing. Obviously, "the City" felt that the Owners had complied with the provisions of the Loan Commitment letter and relative amendments. The present Owners relied on "the City's" 2011 interpretation of Section 7 when deciding to purchase the property, and naturally looked to the future when the time would come to sell the property. Now, "the city" is adopting an arbitrary and capricious position that would effectively prevent the ro ert from bein sold until the Grant was removed in a roximatel 45 ears. This would cause a ma -or reduction in the ro ert value with considerable resultant dams es to the resent Owners. The current bank loan of approximately $2,550,000 is shortly coming due. If "the City" was to consider the $6,000,000 as a loan, not a Grant and the provisions of Sect.7 of the Loan Commitment Letter were applicable, this would mean that "the City" could not approve a loan renewal for the $2,550,000 resulting in the present owners not being able to re -finance their loan. This would cause additional significant damages. The "City's" current interpretation does not make any sense. For unknown reason(s) they are arbitrarily changing their position and trying to enforce the terms of a su erseded Commitment Letter. This is not right, and the Council should therefore confirm that the $6,000,000 Grant should not be considered in the calculation of "loan to value". 2 SUPPORTING FACTS (1) "The property" at 42801 Third Street was purchased by the present owners after the execution of the Second Amendment to the Owner Participation Agreement and Irrevocable Commitment Letter. (Exhibit C) The Shibou's, the present owners, due to advancing age and health issues wish to sell "the property" so that it will continue to be managed by experienced operators in a first- class manner for the benefit of low-income families. (2) When "the property" was purchased by the Shibou's in 2011 they obtained a new First Trust Deed from the Commercial Bank in the amount of $3,000,000. "The city" subordinated their lien which nevertheless continued to protect "the city's" ability to enforce compliance with the Regulatory Agreement. (3) At the 2011 purchase date the original owners (the Daltons) were in financial difficulty. The main floor of "the property" had not been completed; there were no windows or doors in the commercial spaces; homeless were living inside the uncompleted areas; the exterior street had not been completed; landscaping was not completed; the building roof had major leakage problems; there were plumbing problems; etc. All these problems had a significant effect on the value of "the property" and were corrected by the present owners at a cost of several hundred thousand dollars. (4) The value of the property in 2011 was no more than $4,000,000. The 2011 bank loan of $3,000,000 plus the subordinated grant lien of $6,000,000 far exceeded this amount. (5) In 2016 after major improvements were completed and the two commercial spaces were leased for approximately $9,000.00 per month, the then $2,800,000 outstanding bank loan plus the subordinated lien of $6,000,000 totaling $8,800,000 far exceeded the then bank appraisal for $5,000,000, but "the city" nevertheless approved the re -finance. 3 (6) The current Buyers propose to finance their acquisition by obtaining a first Trust Deed in the amount of $4,850,000. (Exhibit D). Based on a purchase price of $7,000,000 (Escrow documents previously submitted), the Buyers will be providing equity funds of $2,150,000 plus purchase costs. The Loan to Value is therefore only 69%. (7) A history of the various Agreements relating to the $6,000,000 Grant are as follows: a) August 12, 2008: The Redevelopment Agency ("RDA") issued an Irrevocable "Loan" commitment letter, (Exhibit A) for a permanent loan of $6,000,000. This "Loan" was to bear no interest 6 and re wire no a meats. b) August 12, 2008: A "Loan" Agreement was entered into between the "RDA" and The Warehouse. (Exhibit E). This Agreement specified under section 2(b) that the "loan" shall not bear interest and shall be for iven in 55 ears". c) February 9, 2009: the Second Amendment to the "OPA" was entered into between the "RDA" and the Warehouse. (Exhibit B'). Section D of the recitals state in part that "the RDA" and developer desire to modify the "OPA", related documents, and the Commitment Letter to reflect that the "RDA" has the right to make a $6,000,000 Grant in li� the $6,000,000 Loan. Article 1, (a) the modifications state that the "RDA" may make a grant of $6,000,000 in lieu of the $6,000,000 loan. (b) elaborates on the change from a "loan" to a "grant" and include wording that "no promissory note shall be required" Article 2(a) states that "this second amendment constitutes the entire agreement and su ersedes all rior a reements,►. !� d) May 12, 2010: recorded Deed of Trust, page 2, (Exhibit F), refers to the $6,000,000 as a GRANT not a Loan. e) May 12, 2010: The Regulatory Agreement ("RA"), (Exhibit G), part D under Recitals refers to the "RDA" Grant not Loan. Nowhere in this "RA" is there a� ? re.`eu ec�ce to a s-Oan� SUMMARY of HISTORY "The City" originally provided The Warehouse with $6,000,000 which was referred to as a loan, although the terms and conditions of the advance (no repayment and no interest") more closely resembled a Gift than a Loan. Subsequently, by amendment all commitment letters, loan agreements etc. were superseded and the "loan" was converted to a GRANT. The main difference between a grant and a loan is repayment. A loan requires you to repay the money you borrow, whereas a grant does not. Grants are essentially a gift with conditions attached. The borrower of a Loan is required to repay with interest and within a certain time. If repayment is defaulted, the lender usually has the right to enforce collection. There is no repayment or interest required in connection with the "RDA" Grant. The agreement between "the city" and the state requires Redevelopment Grants, not loans to be made to regulated housing projects. SUMMATION There is absolutely no question that the $6,000,000 advanced by "the city„ is a Grant, not a Loan. Accordingly, any calculation under Section7 of the Irrevocable Loan Commitment Letter dated August 12, 2008, must exclude this amount. 5 We respectively suggest that "the City" abide by the terms of the existing Agreements, and their previous interpretations and allow the prospective Buyers to finance the purchase with a first Trust Deed in the amount of $4,850,000. Sincerely, Keith A Shibou CPA Per: ORIGINAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92590 August 12, 2008 The Warehouse at Creekside, LLC 41911 5th Street, Suite 302 Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: William Dalton Re: Irrevocable Permanent Loan Commitment for The Warehouse at Crcekside LLC Loan Amount: $6,000,000 Property: 42081 3`d Street, Temecula, CA 92590 APN: 922-06-012 Gentlemen: This letter constitutes our irrevocable permanent loan commitment ("Commitment") whereby Agency shall loan Borrower the sum of up to Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) ("Agency's Permanent Loan") on the Following terms and conditions: Permanent Lender: 2. Construction Lender: 3. Borrower: 4. Agency's Permanent Loan Amount: 5. Term of Commitment: 6. Terms: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula ("Agency"), Commercial Bank of California ("Bank") 695 Town Center Drive, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 The Warehouse at Creekside LLC, a California limited liability company (`Borrower") $6,000,000 (maximum) 24 months from date of this letter. 55 years; no interest and no payments if conditions of OPA (as defined in Paragraph 11) are rnet, Loan documents to be in form acceptable to Agency. Sectlr . Second trust deed on the real property and mixed use (commercial/residential) building to be constructed at 42801 Third Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ("the Project"), (APN 922-046-012). The improvements ("Improvements") shall include nineteen (19) one - bedroom apartments, twelve (12) two -bedroom townhomes and one (1) two -bedroom apartment (the "Project"). Agency trust deed to be recorded at funding. The initial construction loan, and any 11087-002111071074v1.doc refinance of the construction loan, shall: (i) have an interest rate not to exceed the prevailing market rates for similar loans; and (ii) the principal amount shall not exceed an amount which, when added to the Agency's Permanent Loan is 100% of the value of the Project upon completion. Regulatory Agreement: Prior to funding and recording the deed of trust in favor - of the Agency, a Regulatory Agreement as defined in §4.5 of the OPA shall be recorded against the Project and must be senior to any and all liens encumbering the Project. Purpose: In reliance on this commitment Ietter, Bank will make a construction loan in a principal amount of up to $8,500,000 to BOrrawer ("the Construction Loan"). The loan proceeds of the Agency's Permanent Loan shall be for the sole purpose of paying down the Construction Loan (to the extent it was used for the Project) when the conditions set forth in Paragraph 10 are met. 10. Candi[ioris to Futrdin�: In iao event shall the Agency be obligated to fund the Agency's Permanent Loan prior to July 1, 2009 or after the expiration of this commitment. In addition to the Other requirements herein, satisfaction of the following are conditions to the Agency's funding of the Agency's Permanent Loan: (a) Borrower shall have completed the Improvements; (b ) Borrower shall have obtained and there shall remain in effect a Certificate of Occupancy for the Improvements; (c) Borrower shall cause a Notice of Completion (as described in California Civil Code §3093) with rWpcct to the Improvements to be recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County, California; (d) there shall be issued to Agency an ALTA lender's title policy which insures the Agency's deed of trust, that is acceptable in form and substance to the Agency and insures the lien of the Agency's deed of trust as a second priority lien (subordinate only to the lien securing the unpaid balance of the construction loan); (e) presentation to" Agency of evidence (such as insurance certificates) of such fire and casualty insurance on the Project as may be required by Agency. The insurance carrier providing the insurance shall be chosen by Borrower subject to Agency's approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and the policy shall include a standard mortgagee loss payable clause. 11. Owner Partini atiott A reexnent: Bank shall not be bound by the terms of the OPA or any other documents between Agency and Borrower. fI087-002111071074vI.doc 1.2• Assi nment: DATED: August' �, 2008 Borrower may assign this Commitment to Bank or any Other lender providing construction financing. AGENCY. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECC7 , a p lie y, coz �-a , and politic By r Ron Roberts ATTE5S-T-�-�, Temecula Redevelopment Agency Chairperson Susan 3ofi es, MG City CleKk Agency ecretary BORROWER: APPROVED AS TO FORM: RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON a profes �al coop -ation By: . Peter Thorson, Agency Counsel 11087-0021\1071074vLdoc TIC WAREHOUSE A REEKSIDE LLC, a California limit ility company By: William R. Dalton, Marta M M r By. Todd W. Dalton, Managing Member July 29, 2021 Ms. Jennie Smith, Real Estate Analyst Greystone Servicing Company, LLC 419 Belle Air Lane Warrenton, VA 20186 And Fannie Mae Re: Appraisal of Real Property The Warehouse at Creekside 42081 3rd Street Temecula, California 92590 BBG File No. 0121012088 Dear Ms. Smith: In accordance with your authorization, we have conducted the investigation necessary to form the folio win opinion of values: g p neon • As Is, Encumbered value of the Fee Simple Interest of the subject pro • As If Unencumbered, H Property, as Of July 16, 2021. Hypothetical value of the Fee Simple Interest of the subject property, as Of July 16, 2021. If • Insurable Value. The Warehouse at Creekside is an elevatorServed mixed -use residentiai/retail development with two 2 buildings an a 0.52-acre site. The buildings have a gross building area of 33,201 square feet, with 23,020 square feet of rentable residential area, The primary building features two ground level retail spaces totaling 323,0 square e t o ntable building has three floors, configured as two residential floors over a ground level podium parkin e units. The seconds ea The primary N building is positioned in an inner courtyard of the primary building and contains ereident all units only, The buildings were constructed in 2009 of wood frame with stucco, siding, and brick masonry exteriors and a flat roof. The buildings are demised for 32 affordable residential units at "low to moderate" income I based on the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development and Housing Authority he County of Riverside California Redevelopment agency's annuallylevels provided information, this is 60% and 11o% of the area AM[. The length) of the regulatory agreencome and rent ment isfor 55 netts years from May 12, 2010 it is scheduled to expire in 2065. This report is intended for use only by Greystone Servicin g Company, LLC, Fannie Mae, and related entities, successors and/or assigns. and their successors and assigns ("Lender). The use by others is not intended b g Inc. Furthermore, the report is intended only foruse in collateral valuation for a proposed secured credit tr and is not intended for any other use. Y 6G, ansaction This is an appraisal report, which is intended to conform with the requirements of the Uniform Standards Professional Appraisa! Practice (USPAP), as well as your institution's guidelines set forth in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 19 9 (FIRE of and the December 2010 Interagency A guidelines and requirements, the appraisal g Y Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines. 89 (FIRREAj, This report is for the use and benefit of, and may be relied upon by, a) Greystone Servicing Company, LLC, Fannie Mae, and related entities, successors and/or assigns. , and a successors and assigns, b) Independent auditors, accountants, attorneys and other professionals acting on behalf of Lender; any c) Governmental agencies having regulatory authority over Lender; THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE APPRAISAL Ms. Smith July 29, 2021 Page 1 d) Designated persons pursuant to an order or legal process of any court or governmental agency; e) Prospective purchasers of the Mortgage; and f) With respect to any debt (or portion thereof) and/or securities secured, directly or indirectly, by the Property which is subject of this report, the following parties and their respective successors and assigns: • Any placement agent or broker/dealer and any of their respective affiliates, agents or advisors; • Any initial purchaser or subsequent holder of such debt and/or securities; • Any Servicer or other agent acting on behalf of the holders of such debt and/or securities; • Any indenture trustee; ® Any rating agency; and • Any institutional provider from time to time of any liquidity facility or credit Sup port financings. In addition, this report, or a reference to this report, may be included or quoted in any offering circular, offering memorandum, registration statement, private brochure (in either electronic or hard copy format) in connection with aesecurit zat on orment circular, information debt (or portion thereof) and/or securities, memorandum, prospectus or sales nsaction involving such The impact of the COViD-19 virus has created near -term instability in the capital and real estate markets. It is currently unknown what director indirect effect, if any, this event may have on the national economy, the local economy, and the s should local market. As such, the associated risk may not yet be priced into the real estate +narket. The reader should note the data and camparables used in this report are data points e Post, and there is projection risk associated with using lagging indicators. The opinions of this report are as of that occurred in th specific point in time and may change in the near terra. Please reference the COVID-19 Overview in the Market Analysis section of the appraisal report for further discussion. III The values presented within this appraisal report are subject to the extraordiRna 9 a um Standconditions listed below. Pursuant to the requirement within Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Standards Rule 2-2(a)(xi), it is stated here that the use of any extraordina ptions and hypothetical assigrds Rule 2-2 aveafe Practice extraordinary assumptions might have affected the ExtraordinaryAssumption(s) The subject is encumbered by a Regulatory g RedevelopmentAge ncyoftheCityofTemecuIa,whce h strctsetenantincome and rents on all 32 residential units to "low- and moderate -income levels." Income and rent limits are based on the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development and Housing Authority of the County of Riverside California Redevelopmentagency's annually published income and rent limits. According to provided information, this is 60% and 110% of the area AMI. The length of the regulatoryagreementis for55 years From May12, 2010, it is scheduled to expire in 2065. Our analysis is predicated on the assumption that this is true, and should these restrictions change, then the as is encumbered" value conclusion set forth herein will warrant reconsideration. HypotheticalCondition(s) The subject is encumbered b y a Regulatory th the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, which restrictshrestrictsetenant nt lincome and rents on all 32 residential units to "low- and moderate -income levels." Per the requirements of the client, a hypothetical condition is employed that assumes the absence of the restricting documents and, therefore, any restrictions associated with income or rent. The expressed intent of the hypothetical condition is to provide a market value of the property such that both income and expenses reflect market levels with no influence from any restrictive encumbrances. THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE APPRAISAL BBT' �u , _`j Ms. Smith July 29, 2021 Page 3 Based on our inspection of the property and the investigation and the analysis undertaken, we have developed the following value opinion(s). Mb it unencumbered, Hypothetical JUIv lo, <u21 $7,000,000 Fee Simple July 16, 2021 $10,850.000 Based on recent market transactions, as well as discussions with market participants, a sale of the subject property at the above -stated opinion of market value would have required an exposure time of a less months. Furthermore, a marketing time of approximately 6 months, or less monthspscourrentl 1 V,,a months, the subject Property, This letter must remain attached to the report, which should be transmitted in its entirety, in order for the value opinion set forth to be considered valid. Our firm appreciates the opportunity to have performed this appraisal assignment on your behalf. If we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, BBG, Inc. Alireza Khoshbin CA Certified General Appraiser Lice n s e #: AG 044624 714-415-0154 akhoshbin@bbgres,com THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE APPRAISAL L N2 o� ass IRREVpCAI3GE LOAN CpMM]'T11IENTSTECEMENT AND THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT AND iRREVOCA13LE LOAN COMMITMENT [the "Second Amendment" s dated as 0 f February 9, 2009 and is entered into by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGErNCY OF THE CITY OF TEIVIECULA, a public body, corporate and politic " CREEKSIDE, LLC, a California limited liability company and THE WAREHOUSE AT COMMERCIAL BANK OF CALIFQRNIA ("ConstrtrctpiorlLender").elope,,), with the consent of RECITALS A• Agency and Developer entered into can Owner Participation Agreement dated as of August 12, 2008, and amended it by a First Amendment to owner Participation Agreement dated as of February 24, 2009 (including all exhibits thereto, the "OPA")� The OPA provides far, among other things, the execution, delivery and recordation of a Regulatory Agreement between Agency and Developer (the "Regulatory Agreement") for affordable housing (the "Project") on the property described in the OPA, and a permanent loan by the Agency to the Developer to be used to repay construction financing provided to Developer by the Construction Lender to construct the Project. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the OPA. B. Agency and Developer entered into an Irre August 12, 204vocable Loan Cominitrnerzt dated $, which was amended by a First Amendment to Irrevocable Loan Commitment dated February 24, 2009, that conditionally requires the Agenc, repay the construction Ioan for the Project [the "Contnzitment Lettery tomake a $6,000,000 loan to '}. (The Con�rnitment Letter expires on February 12, 2011.} C. Pursuant to Assignment of Commitment Letter dated march 4 2009, Developer assigned its rights under the Commitment Letter. to Construction Lender, and the Agent executed a Consent to Assignment dated March 6, 2009• Y D. Agency and Developer desire to modify the OPA, the documents described therein, and the Commitment Letter (with the consent of the Construction Lender) to I•e€lect that the Agency has the right to make a conditional rant of eveloper in Ii $6,000,000 loan (but if the Agency fails to make the grant, $6,000,000 6 DOA,g00cy Dail remain obligated f ttrn make the $6,000,000 loan as currently described in the Commitment better and OPA). g NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and other consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, Agency and Developer hereby agree as follows: I. Modi�cation5. a. Developer, Agency and Construction Lender agree that the Agency may make a grant of $6,000,000 to Developer in lieu of the $6,000,00Q loan described in the OPA and Commitment Letter; however, Agency hereby agrees and confirms that if Agency does riot make such grant, Agency shall remain Obligated to make the $6,0007000 lean described in the OPA 1 1087-0021 \ 1188948 v ].do(; and Commitment Letter upon and sub - Commitment Letter, -ect to the terms and conditions in the OPA and b, If a grant is made by the Agency, the grant shall be disbursed upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions as set forth in the Conmitment Letter, except that no promissory note shall be required, and the Regulatory Agreement and Deed of Trust (which have not yet been executed) shall reflect that a grant rather than a loan is being made and that the grant shall become reitnbut-sable tQ the Agency by Developer upon the occurrence of any of the eve that would entitle the Agency to accelerate the Loan under the current terms of OPA and Loan nts Agreement. General Provisions. a• Entire A reerrrent, This Second Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Second Amendment may not be modified, amended, supplemented, or otherwise changed, except by a writing executed by both parties hereto. b• LVaiver. No failure or delay by ally party in the exercise of any right hereunder r partial exercise of any such right shall constitute a waiver thereof, nor shall any single o preclude other or further exercise thereof, or any other right, C. Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts and by different parties hereto an separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deetried an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. d. Covernirr° Law This Second Amendment shall be deemed to be a contract made under the laws of the State of California and for all purposes shall be govenied by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. e- Attorne s' Fees and Costs Second Amendm. If a dispute arises under or in connection with this ent (including, without limitation, the enforcement or interpretation of this Second Amendment), the prevailing party (as determined by the trier of fact) shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' Fees and costs from the other party. 11087-0021\1188948v1.doc 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above written. THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE, LLC, a California limited iability company By: William R. Dalton, Managing Me ber By: 'I'odd�„ alton, Managing Member REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic By: Mike Naggar, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan Jo es, CMC City Cle Agency S retat-y APPROVED TO FORM: Richards, Watson & Gershon, a professional corporation By; Peter Thorson, Agency Counsel 11087-0021\1188948v .doe APPROVED By CONSTRUCTION COMMEI' L BANK OF CALIFORNIA By: Print :Name�_: �,o Title- teU��ctA�� 11087-0021U 188948V1_doc 4 FIRS-h C0khMFRCIAL , I .. I RE: The Warehouse at Creekside Temecula, CA 92590 TERM SHEET Loan Type Fannie Mae MAH Immediate Delivery Proposed Loan Amount $4,850,000 Loan Term 10 Years mortization Period 30 Years Interest Only Period 3 Years Index Rate 10-year Treasury Note *The yield used for the underlying rate for the note rat will be the greater of the yield on the index at lock or a Fannie Mae treasury flo❑ of 0,90% bps Proposed Interest Rate 3.70% [223 basis points plus the Index Rate] Prepayment Terms 9.5 years Yield Maintenance Maximum Loan -to -Value 70% as determined by UW Minimum Debt Service Coverage 1.20x as determined by UW DSC) UW nterest Accrual Basis Actual/360 lecourse Non -Recourse (exceptions may apply) Y pp Y) Gil Figueroa, CEO First Commercial Capital, Inc. 14241 E. Firestone Blvd., Suite 400 La Mirada, CA 90638 Gil@Firstcommercialcapital.com Direct: 562-754-5626 Office: 562-293-4076 Efax:562-381-8501 LOAN AGREEMENT This LOAN AGREEMENT (this "Loan Agreement") is made and entered into effective as of August 12, 2008 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"), and THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE LLC, a California limited liability company ("Borrower"). RECITALS A. Pursuant to that certain Owner Participation Agreement dated as of August o� 2008 between Agency and Borrower (the "OPA") and that certain Irrevocable Permanent Loan Commitment dated concurrently herewith, Agency has agreed to provide financial assistance to Borrower for construction of certain improvements on that certain land located in the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area No. I988-1 (the "Project_ Area"), in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California that is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property") that are to be used for affordable rental housing for low and moderate income persons and families. B. The purpose of this Loan Agreement is to further the Agency's affordable housing goals in the City of Temecula (the "City") by facilitating the construction of nineteen (19) one - bedroom apartments, twelve (12) two -bedroom townhomes and one (1) two -bedroom apartment (each, a "Unit" and collectively, the "Units") on the Property (the "Project") and thereby increase the supply of affordable housing in the City. C. The Agency desires to lend to the Borrower, and the Borrower agrees to borrow from the Agency, $6,000,000 from the Agency's affordable housing set -aside funds as a permanent loan that will repay part of the construction loan for the Project. D. The Project is in the best and vital interests of Agency and the City, and the health, safety and welfare of the residents and taxpayers in the City, and is in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable state and local laws. Completion of the Project will eliminate significant blight in the community as required by the Housing Element of the General Plan and the Redevelopment Implementation Plan for the Project Area, r NOW, THEREFORE, THE AGENCY AND THE BORROWER AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. FundamentaI Provisions. (a) Amount of Loan: $6,000,000,00. (b) Borrower's Address for Notices: 11087-002111071117v l .dot -1- The Warehouse at Creekside LLC 41911 5th Street, Suite 302 Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: William Dalton 2. Loan Agreement. (a) Agency hereby agrees to lend to Borrower, and Borrower agrees to borrow, on the terms and conditions set forth herein, the amount set forth in Section L(a), above (the "Loan"). The Loan shall also include any additional advances made by the Agency in connection with the Project (including improvements on which the Project is to be located and any and all costs of curing defaults under the loan(s) for such improvements) in excess of the amount set forth in Section 1(a) above. The Loan to Borrower shall be evidenced by and conditioned upon Borrower's execution of the OPA and: (i) this Loan Agreement; (ii) a Promissory Note; (iii) a Regulatory Agreement; (iv) a Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (with Assignment of Rents) (the "Deed of Trust"); and (v) such other documents relating to the Loan as the Agency may require (collectively, the "Loan Documents"), (b) The Loan shall not bear interest except as may be provided otherwise in the Note. The entire outstanding principal balance shall be forgiven upon the Fifty- fifth (55`h) anniversary of the date of the Promissory Note provided no Event of Default by Borrower has occurred under this Loan Agreement or the OPA. (c) The Loan may be prepaid, in whole or in part, without penalty. Borrower shall have not have any right to re -barrow any such prepaid amounts. (d) The Loan must close on or before the date which is two (2) years after the date of this Loan Agreement. 3. Use of Proceeds. Borrower shall use the Loan for the sole purpose of paying the construction loan used to construct the improvements (the "Improvements") described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto (the "Scope of Development"). 4. Conditions to Closing. As a condition precedent to the Agency's Loan, Borrower shall satisfy all conditions to closing in the OPA. All Loan Documents must be in form and substance acceptable to the Agency in the Agency's sole and absolute discretion 5. Disbursement. Provided the conditions to closing have been satisfied and Borrower is not in default under this Loan Agreement or the OPA, Agency, or its authorized agents, shall disburse the Loan proceeds to the escrow described in the OPA with instructions to apply the proceeds to the construction loan provided that escrow has sufficient funds to pay, and actually pays, the entire construction loan and is committed to reconvey the deed of trust securing said construction loan. 6. Completion of Construction. Borrower agrees to commence and complete construction of the Project in accordance with the OPA. 1 1087-002111071117v l .doc -2 7. Agency Remedies. If the Agency should, pursuant to any express provision of the Loan Documents, if any, or in the exercise of the Agency's rights provided by law, cure any default of a mortgage, pay any taxes that are delinquent, or expend -any other sums to protect the Agency's security interest in the Property and Improvements, as provided in the Loan Documents or otherwise, such expenditures shall at the Agency's option be charged against the Agency's disbursement obligations as advances on the Loan, or shall be considered additional advances thereunder. 8. Notice of Completion. Borrower shall, upon the reasonable request of the Agency, sign and file for record any notices of completion, notices of cessation of labor or any other notice or written document that the Agency may deem necessary to file or record to protect the Agency's security or interests hereunder. 9. No Liability to Contractors. The Agency shall in no way be liable for any act or omission of Borrower, the architect, general contractor, any subcontractor, any agent of any of them, or any person furnishing labor and/or materials used in or related to such construction. The Borrower shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless the Agency on account of any claims that may be made against the Borrower by the architect, general contractor, any subcontractor, any agent of any of them, or any person furnishing labor and/or materials used in or related to such construction, or any third party on account of any work performed or materials provided by any of them. 10. Hazardous Materials. Borrower shall not release or permit the release of any Hazardous Material into, onto, beneath or from the Property, and any such release of any Hazardous Material into, onto, beneath or from the Property shall be an Event of Default hereunder. The Agency shall have the right to suspend any disbursement of Loan proceeds hereunder upon a reasonable belief of such a present release by, or permitted by, Borrower, of any Hazardous Material into, onto, beneath or from the Property. The Agency may, upon reasonable notice, enter and inspect the Property for the purpose of determining the existence, location, nature and magnitude of any past or present release of any Hazardous Material into, onto, beneath or from the Property upon a reasonable belief of the existence of a past or present release or threatened release of any Hazardous Material into, onto beneath or from the Property. Hazardous Materials are defined in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 11. Insurance. Until the repayment or forgiveness of the principal and interest under the Note and the satisfaction of Borrower's obligations under this Loan Agreement, Borrower shall comply with the following. (a) Borrower shall obtain and maintain at no cost or expense to Lender, with a reputable and financially responsible insurance company reasonably acceptable to Lender, both commercial broad form general public liability insurance, (insuring against claims and liability for bodily injury, death, or property damage arising from the construction, use, occupancy, condition, or operation of the Project) and automobile liability insurance. Such general public liability insurance and automobile insurance shall each provide combined single limit protection of at least $2,000,000. Such insurance policy(s) shall name the City and the 11087-002111071117v1.doc -3- Agency and their elected officials, council members, board members, officers, employees, consultants, independent contractors, attorneys and servants as additional insureds_ (i) Before commencement of any work by Borrower on any portion of the Property, Borrower shall obtain and maintain in force until completion of such work (i) "all risk " builder's risk insurance with a combined single limit of at least $2,000,000, including coverage for vandalism and malicious mischief, in a form and with a company reasonably acceptable to the Lender, and (d) workers' compensation insurance covering all persons employed by Borrower in connection with work on the Project, or any portion thereof, Such builder's risk insurance shall cover improvements in place and all material and equipment at the job site furnished under contract, but shall exclude contractors', subcontractors', and construction managers' tools and equipment and property owned by contractors' and subcontractors' employees. (ii) Borrower shall also furnish or cause to be furnished to the Lender evidence satisfactory to the Lender that any contractor with whom it has contracted for the performance of work on the Property or otherwise pursuant to this Agreement carries workers' compensation insurance as required by law. Gil) With respect to each policy of insurance required above, Borrower and each of Borrower's general contractors shall furnish to the Lender an insurance certificate on the insurance carrier's form setting forth the general provisions of the insurance coverage (as well as a copy of each insurance policy promptly upon receipt by Borrower). The required certificate shall be furnished by Borrower prior to commencement of the Project. (iv) All such policies required by this Section small be issued by responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in California with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than ANIII, be primary and noncontributing, shall be nonassessable and shall contain language to the effect that (i) the policies cannot be canceled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' written notice by the insurer to the Lender by certified mail, and (ii) the Lender shall not be liable for any premiums or assessments_ All such insurance shall have deductibility limits which shall be commercially reasonable. (v) Each policy of insurance required above shall include a waiver by the insurer of all rights it may have to be subrogated to rights against Lender (or its elected officials, council members, board members, officers, employees, agents and representatives) in connection with any insured loss, and Borrower hereby waives any rights it may have against such persons or entities in connection with matters covered by insurance. (vi) Borrower represents and warrants that it has provided a copy of this Loan Agreement to its insurers and that the insurers are aware of all of the obligations of Borrower under this Loan Agreement. 12. Representations and Warranties. Borrower makes the following representations and warranties as of the date of this Loan Agreement and agrees that such representations and warranties shall survive and continue after the Loan is paid: 11087-0021\1071117v1.doe -4- (a) Authority. Borrower has complied with all laws and regulations concerning Borrower's organization, existence and transaction of business. Borrower has the right and power to own and develop the Property and Improvements thereon as contemplated in the Loan Documents. Borrower has, or at all appropriate times shall have properly obtained, all permits, licenses and approvals necessary to construct, occupy and operate the Improvements on the Property and in so doing has, or shall have (as appropriate), substantially complied with the plans and specifications for construction and all other applicable statutes, laws, regulations and ordinances. (b) Enforceability. Borrower has full right, power and authority to execute and deliver the Loan Documents and to perform the undertakings of Borrower contained in the Loan Documents, The Loan Documents constitute valid and binding obligations of Borrower which are legally enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to the laws of bankruptcy, creditor's rights exceptions, and equity. (c) No Breach. To the best of Borrower's knowledge, none of the undertakings of Borrower contained in the Loan Documents violates any applicable statute, law, regulation or ordinance or any order or ruling of any court or governmental entity, or conflicts with, or constitutes a breach or default under, any agreement by which Borrower is, or the Property and Improvements thereon are, bound or regulated. (d) Financial Information. To the best of Borrower's knowledge, all financial information delivered to the Agency by Borrower, including, without limitation, information relating to Borrower, the Property, and the Improvements thereon, fairly and accurately represents such financial condition. No material adverse change in such financial condition has occurred. (e) Proceedings. To the best of Borrower's knowledge, Borrower is not in violation of any statute, law, regulation or ordinance, or of any order of any court or governmental entity. Borrower has no actual knowledge of any claims, actions or proceedings pending or threatened against Borrower or affecting the Property or Improvements that are not covered by insurance, other than those disclosed to the Agency in writing. (f) Accuracy. To the best of Borrower's knowledge, all documents, reports, instruments, papers, data, information and forms of evidence delivered to the Agency by Borrower with respect to the Loan are accurate and correct, are complete insofar as completeness may be necessary to give the Agency true and accurate knowledge of the subject matter thereof, and do not contain any material misrepresentation or omission. The Agency may rely on such reports, documents, instruments, papers, data, information and forms of evidence without any investigation or inquiry, and any payment made by the Agency in reliance thereon shall be a complete release in the Agency's favor of all sums so paid. (g) Taxes. Borrower has filed all federal, state, county and municipal Lax returns required to have been filed by Borrower and has paid all taxes which have become due pursuant to such returns or to any notice of assessment received by Borrower. Borrower has no knowledge of any basis for additional assessment with respect to such taxes. 11087-0021\ 1071117v 1.doc -5- (h) Utilities. To the best of Borrower's knowledge, all utility services necessary for the development and the occupancy of the Property, including without limitation gas, water, sewage, electrical and telephone, are available at or within the boundaries of the Property or all steps necessary to assure that such utility services will be available upon completion of the Improvements have been taken by Borrower. (i) Impairment of Security. No materials, equipment, fixtures, carpets, appliances, or any other part of the Improvements shall be purchased or installed under conditional sales agreements, leases, or under other arrangements wherein the right is reserved or accrues to anyone to remove or to repossess any such items. This paragraph shall not be construed to prohibit the leasing of tools used for construction of the Improvements. 13, Default of Borrower. (a) Events of Default. The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute an Event of Default by Borrower hereunder. (i) Borrower's failure to pay by the due date any sums or amounts due the Agency under this Loan Agreement, the Promissory Note, the Deed of Trust, the Regulatory Agreement, or any other Loan Document that is not cured within five (5) days after written notice from Agency; (ii) Borrower's breach of any warranty or representation hereunder; (iii) Borrower's breach or default under any of the Loan Documents that is not otherwise described in this Section and failure to cure the same after notice and within the time period described in Section 6.1 of the OPA; (iv) The occurrence of an Event of Default under the OPA. (v) The failure to deliver a monthly progress report under Section 7 of this Loan Agreement and failure to cure such failure within five (5) business days after written notice from the Agency. (vi) Any other act, omission or event which is described as an "Event of Default" elsewhere in this Loan Agreement, the OPA or in any other Loan Document. (b) Rernedies. In addition to any other remedies available to Agency at law and equity: (i) Agency may terminate this Loan Agreement; (h) Borrower shall be liable to Agency for any damages caused by such default, and Agency may thereafter commence an action for damages against Borrower with respect to such default; (iii) Agency may, at Agency's option, commence an action for specific performance of the terms of this Loan Agreement or any other agreement between Borrower and Agency pertaining to such default; (iv) all sums disbursed or advanced by Agency shall, at the option of Agency, immediately become due and payable; (v) the Agency shall be released from any and all further obligations to Borrower under the terms of this Loan Agreement; and (vi) Agency shall have the right to obtain the appointment of a receiver for the Project and related improvements upon exparte motion; and/or (vii) Agency 11 os7-0021 \ 1071 117v 1.doc -6- may foreclose the Deed of Trust judicially (if a deficiency is sought) or nonjudicially. Agency's rights and remedies under this Loan Agreement include, without limitation, recovery of improper disbursements and overpayments, or reduction of payments and termination of this Loan Agreement. 14. No Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. No disbursement of Loan proceeds shall constitute a waiver of any conditions to the Agency's obligation to make further disbursements nor, in the event Borrower is unable to satisfy any such conditions, shall any such waiver have the effect of precluding the Agency from thereafter declaring such inability to constitute a default under this Loan Agreement. No disbursement of proceeds based upon inadequate or incorrect information shall constitute a waiver of a right to receive a refund thereof. No failure or delay on the part of the Agency in the exercise of any power, right or privilege hereunder or under any of the other Loan Documents shall impair such power, right or privilege or be construed to be a waiver of any default or acquiescence therein, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such power, right or privilege preclude any other or further exercise thereof or of any other right, power or privilege. All rights and remedies existing under this Loan Agreement or the other Loan Documents are cumulative to and not exclusive of any rights or remedies otherwise available. The Agency's acceptance of less than the entire amount due for any payment on the Promissory Note shall not constitute a waiver by the Agency to thereafter demand the entire amount due. 15, Disbursements in Excess of Maximum Loan Amount. In the event the total disbursements by the Agency exceed the maximum Loan amount, the total of all disbursements shall be secured by the applicable Loan Documents. lb. Empowerment of A enc . Borrower does hereby irrevocably appoint, designate, empower and authorize the Agency as Borrower's agent, coupled with an interest, to sign and file for record any notice or written document that the Agency may deem necessary to file or record to protect the Agency's security or interests hereunder, 17, Borrower's Indemnity of Agency and Cit . Borrower hereby agrees to, and shall defend (with counsel approved by the Agency), indemnify and hold Agency, the City and their Representatives harmless from and against all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, expenses, or liabilities, including attorneys' fees and court costs, arising from, in connection with, or in any way resulting from (i) Borrower's breach of this Loan Agreement or any of the Loan Documents, (ii) Borrower's negligence or intentional misconduct with respect to the Property or the Improvements or the subject matter hereof, or (iii) the construction of the Improvements, including without limitation, any act or omission of Borrower, the general contractor, the architect, any agent of any of them, or any person furnishing labor and/or materials used in or related to such construction. Agency shall have no liability whatsoever for any acts or omissions of Borrower or its architects, contractors, or agents, or any one of them, or any other person furnishing services, labor and/or material to Borrower in connection with the Property. 18. Assi nment of Agreement and Transfer. No assignment or transfer, voluntary or involuntary, may be made of this Loan Agreement or of any right hereunder, and no attempted transfer shall be binding upon or in any way affect the Agency without the Agency's 11087-0021 \ 1071117v l .doc -7- prior written consent, which may be withheld in the Agency's sole and absolute discretion. Borrower acknowledges that the identity of Borrower is of particular concern to Agency, and it is because of Borrower's identity that Agency has entered into this Loan Agreement with Borrower. No voluntary or involuntary successor in interest of Borrower shall acquire any rights or powers under this Loan Agreement. In the event of an assignment or transfer that is not approved by the Agency, the Agency shall have the right to declare the entire principal balance of the Loan and all accrued interest, if any, immediately due and payable. 19. Governing Law,• Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Loan Agreement. Any action must be instituted in either the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or in an appropriate court in that County. 20. Obligation to Refrain from Discrimination. (a) There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person, or group of persons, on account of sex, marital status, age, handicap, race, color, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Property, and Borrower (itself or any person claiming under or through Borrower) shall not establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees, or vendees thereof or any portion thereof. (b) Borrower shall refrain from restricting and shall cause each Unit owner to refrain from restricting the rental, sale or lease of the Property or any portion thereof, on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, age, handicap, marital status, race, color, religion, creed, ancestry or national origin of any person. All such deeds, leases or contracts shall contain or be subject to the nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses set forth in the OPA. 21. Severability. If any term or provision of this Loan Agreement or the application thereof shall to any extent be held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Loan Agreement, or the application of such term or provision to circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Loan Agreement shall be valid and shall be enforced to the extent permitted by law. 22. Notices. All notices, demands or other communications under this Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall be given in writing by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, by personal delivery or by a nationally recognized overnight courier, addressed to the parties as follows (provided that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall thereafter be given as demanded in that notice): To Agency: Temecula Redevelopment Agency 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Telephone: (909) 694-6444 11087-002111071117v1.doc -8- Telecopier: (909) 694-1999 Attention: Executive Director With a copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon 355 South Grand Avenue, 401h Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-3101 Attention: Peter M. Thorson, Esq. Telephone: (213) 626-8484 Telecopier: (213) 626-0078 To Borrower: At the address set forth in Section 1(b), above. Notices shall be considered given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery; (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested; or (c) one (1) business day following deposit with a nationally recognized overnight courier. 23. Litigation. If either party shall be or shall become a party to any legal proceedings instituted primarily against the other party (as determined by the trier of fact) in connection or arising out of the Improvements and/or the Property, or in the event of any dispute between the parties hereto arising out of this Loan Agreement, the losing party (as determined by the trier of fact) shall pay to the prevailing party (as determined by the trier of fact) all sums paid or incurred by the prevailing party as costs and expenses in the legal proceedings, including but not limited to actual attorneys' fees and costs. 24. Successors and Assigns. Subject to the terms and conditions of Section 26 hereof, this Loan Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns, and may be amended, altered, revoked, modified or waived, in whole or in part, only by an instrument in writing signed by Borrower and Agency. If more than one person executes this Loan Agreement as Borrower, the obligations of each of such persons hereunder- shall be joint and several obligations. 25. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of this Loan Agreement and of each and every provision hereof. 26. Wa rrant A ainst Payment of Consideration for this Loan A regiment. Borrower warrants that Borrower has not paid nor given, and will not pay nor give, any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Loan Agreement, 27. Nonliability of AEncy Officials and Employees. No member, official or employee of Agency shall be personally liable to Borrower or any successors in interest in the event of any default or breach by Agency or for any amount which may become due to Borrower or Borrower's successors or on any obligations under the terms of this Loan Agreement, 28. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Loan Agreement is made for the sole protection of Agency and Borrower and their respective permitted successors and assigns, and no other person or persons shall have any right of action hereon, nor should any laborer, materialman, subcontractor, or other third party rely upon the funds deposited hereunder as a 11087-002111071117vl.doc -9- source of payment for work done or labor and/or materials supplied in respect to the Improvements contemplated hereunder or otherwise, notwithstanding any representation to the contrary made by Borrower, the general contractor or any other person. This Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents contain all of the terms and conditions agreed to by Borrower, and no other agreement regarding the subject matter of this contract, unless it is in writing and signed by Agency and Borrower, shall be deemed to exist or to bind any party hereto. 29. AgencY_Approval. Unless specifically provided for herein, the Agency's approval, including, without limitation, approval of the form of the Loan Documents and of amendments to this Loan Agreement, shall be satisfied by the approval of the Agency's Executive Director. 11087-002 L 11071117v 1.doc -10- STEWART TITLE -Riverside RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO Redevelopment Agency of the City of Telnecul- 43200 Business Park Drive TSR Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Clerk og-zIx, DOC # 2010-0223773 05/9.4/2010 08:00A Fce;NC Page 1 of 11 Recorded in Official Records County of Riverside Larry W. Ward Asse'sor, County Clerk &•Recorder 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 III U I PAGE I SIZE i DA I MISC I LONG I RFD j COPY 465 1 426 PCOR NCOR SMF NCH rAl EjXAM T: CTY UNI Exem t from recording fees pursuant to Gov. Code Section 27383 (Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use) DEED OF TRUST, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILING (WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS) This DEED OF TRUST, SECURITY: AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILING (WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS) (the "Deed of Trust")is made as of May 12, 2010, by THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE LLC, a California limited liabilify 'company ("Trustor"), whose address is 41911 5th Street, Suite 302, Temecula, -CA- 92590, to STEWART TITLE ("Trustee"), for the benefit of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 'OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic ("Beneficiary" ), whose address is Post Office Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92589-9033; Telephone: (951) 694- 6415; Fax: (951) 694-6477. The Trustor grants, transfers and assigns to the Trustee in trust, upon the covenants, conditions and agreements and for the uses and purposes hereinafter contained, with power of sale, and right of entry and possession, all of its right, title and interest in that certain land (the "Site") in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Together with the Trustor's interest in all buildings, structures and improvements of every nature whatsoever now or hereafter situated on the Site; and Together with the rents, issues and profits thereof; and together with all buildings and improvements of every kind and description now or hereafter erected or placed thereon, and all fixtures, including but not limited to goods which are or which become fixtures, and all gas and electric fixtures, engines and machinery, radiators, heaters, furnaces, heating equipment, laundry equipment, steam and hot-water boilers, stoves, ranges, elevators and motors, bathtubs, sinks, water closets, basins, pipes, faucets and other plumbing and heating fixtures, mantles, cabinets, refrigerating plant and refrigerators, whether mechanical or otherwise, cooking apparatus and appurtenances, and all shades, awnings, screens, blinds and other furnishings, it being hereby agreed that all such fixtures and furnishings shall to the extent permitted by law be deemed to be permanently affixed to and a part of the realty; and Together with all building materials and equipment now or hereafter delivered to said premises and intended to be installed therein; and Together with all plans, drawings, specifications, etc., and articles of personal property now or hereafter attached to or used in and about the building or buildings now erected or hereafter to be erected on the Site which are necessary to the completion and comfortable use and occupancy of such building or buildings for the purposes for which they were or are to be erected, including all other goods and chattels and personal property as are ever used or furnished in operating a building, or the activities conducted therein, similar to the one herein described and referred to, and all renewals or replacements thereof or articles in substitution therefor, whether or not the same are, or shall be attached to said building or buildings in any manner. To have and to hold the property hereinbefore described (including the Site and all appurtenances), all such property being referred to collectively herein as the "Property," to the Trustee, its successors and assigns forever. FOR THE PURPOSE of securing (1) Truster's conditional obligation to repay a grant made by the Trustor to the Beneficiary under that "Second Amendment to Owner Participation Agreement and Irrevocable Loan Commitment" dated February 9, 2010 executed by Trustor and Beneficiary, such obligation to repay being set forth in Section 10(b) of that certain Regulatory Agreement dated concurrently herewith between Trustor and Beneficiary; (2) performance by Trustor under and compliance of Trustor with Regulatory Agreement; (3)_performance -by Trustor and compliance by Trustor with all extensions, amendments, modifications or renewals of the Regulatory Agreement. AND TO PROTECT THE SECURITY OF THE DEED OF TRUST, THE TRUSTOR COVENANTS AND AGREES: That it will pay sums due under the Regulatory Agreement at the time and in the manner provided therein and will perform and comply with the terms of the Regulatory Agreement; 2. That it will not permit or suffer the use of any of the Property for any purpose other than the use set forth in the Regulatory Agreement; 3. Upon the occurrence of a default under any Regulatory Agreement that is not cured after any notice from Agency required therein is given and any applicable cure period has expired (an "Event of Default"), the Beneficiary, at its option, may declare the grant repayable; 4. That all rents, profits and income from the'Property covered by this Deed of Trust are hereby assigned to the Beneficiary for the purpose of discharging the obligations hereby secured. Permission is hereby given to the Trustor, so long as no Event of Default exists, to collect such rents, profits and income; -2- That upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the Beneficiary shall be entitled to the appointment of a receiver by any court having jurisdiction, without notice, to take Possession and protect the Property described herein and operate same and collect the rents, profits and income therefrom; 6. To pay, at least ten (10) days before delinquency, any taxes and assessments affecting said Property when due, all encumbrances, charges and liens, with interest, on said Property or any part thereof which appear to be prior or superior hereto, all costs, fees and expenses of this Trust; 7. To keep said Property in good condition and repair, and not to remove or demolish any buildings thereon; to complete or restore promptly and in good and workmanlike manner any building which may be constructed, damaged, or destroyed thereon and to pay when due all claims for labor performed and materials furnished therefor (unless contested in good faith if the Trustor provides security satisfactory to the Beneficiary that any amounts found to be due will be paid and no sale of the Property or other impairment of the security hereunder will occur); to comply with all laws affecting said Property or requiring any alterations or improvements to be made thereon; not to commit or permit waste thereof; not to commit, suffer or permit any act upon said Property in violation of law and/or covenants, conditions and/or restrictions affecting said Property; not to permit or suffer any alteration of or addition to the improvements hereafter constructed in or upon said Property without the consent of the Beneficiary; 8. To appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of the Beneficiary or the Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of evidence of title and attorneys' fees in a reasonable sum, in any such action or proceeding in which the Beneficiary or the Trustee may appear; 9. Should the Trustor fail to make any payment or do any act as herein provided, then the Beneficiary or the Trustee, but without obligation so to do and without notice to or demand upon the Trustor and without releasing the Trustor from any obligation hereof, may make or do the same in such manner and to such extent as either may deem necessary to protect the security hereof, The Beneficiary or the Trustee being authorized to enter upon said Property for such purposes, may commence, appear in and/or defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of the Beneficiary or the Trustee; may pay, purchase, contest or compromise any, encumbrance, charge, or lien which in the Judgment of either appears to be prior or superior hereto; and, in exercising any such powers, may pay necessary expenses, employ counsel, and pay its reasonable fees; 10. Trustor shall maintain reasonable casualty and liability insurance on the Property, .and the Beneficiary shall have the right to obtain and pay for such insurance should the Trustor fail to do so and Trustor shall promptly reimburse Beneficiary for such costs within ten (10) business days after written demand. All such payments not made by the Beneficiary shall be added to the principal sum secured hereby; 11. To pay immediately and without demand all sums so expended by the Beneficiary or the -3- Trustee, under permission given under this Deed of Trust, with interest from date of expenditure at the highest rate of interest permitted by law, after an Event of Default; 12. The Trustor further covenants that it will not voluntarily create, suffer or permit to be created against the Property subject to this Deed of Trust any lien or liens except as authorized by the Beneficiary and further that it will keep and maintain the Property free from the claims of all persons supplying labor or materials which will enter into the construction of any and all improvements now being constructed or to be constructed on the Property; 13. That any and all improvements made or about to be made on the Property, and all plans and specifications, shall comply with all applicable municipal ordinances and regulations and all other regulations made or promulgated, now or hereafter, by lawful authority, and that the same will upon completion comply with all such municipal ordinances and regulations and with the rules of the applicable fire rating or inspection organization, bureau, association or office; IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 14. Should the Property or any part thereof be taken or damaged by reason of any public improvement or condemnation proceeding, or damaged by fire, or earthquake, or in any other manner, the Beneficiary shall be entitled to all compensation, awards, and other payments or relief therefor, and shall be entitled at its option to commence, appear in and prosecute an its own name, any action or proceedings, or to make any carnpromise or settlement, in connection with such taking or damage. All such compensation, awards, damages, rights of action and proceeds, including the proceeds of any policies of fire and other insurance affecting said Property, are hereby assigned to the Beneficiary. After deducting therefrom all its expenses, including attorneys' fees, the balance of the proceeds shall be applied to the amounts secured hereby, to the extent permitted by applicable law; 15. Upon the occurrence of 'an Event of Default, the Beneficiary may declare all sums secured hereby immediately due and payable and may exercise its rights and remedies under the Regulatory Agreement and applicable law, including, without Iimitation, delivery to the Trustee of written declaration of default and demand for sale, and of written notice of default and of election to cause the Property to be sold, which notice the Trustee shall cause to be duly filed for record; 16. Beneficiary's remedies shall include, without limitation, after the lapse of such time as may then be required by law following the recordation of said notice of default, and notice of sale having been given as then required by law, the right to cause the Trustee, without demand on the Trustor, to sell said Property at the time and place fixed by it in said notice of sale, either as a whole or in separate parcels, and in such order as it may determine at public auction to the highest bidder for cash in lawful money of the United States, payable at time of sale. The Trustee may postpone sale of all or any portion of said Property by public announcement at the time and place of sale, and from time to time thereafter may postpone the sale by public announcement at the time fixed by the M preceding postponement. The Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser its deed conveying the property so sold, but without any' covenant or warranty, express or implied. The recitals in the deed of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof Any person, including the Trustor, the Trustee or the Beneficiary, may purchase at the sale. The Trustee shall apply the proceeds of sale to payment of. (a) the expenses of such sale, together with the reasonable expenses of this trust including therein the Trustee's fees or attorneys' fees for conducting the sale, and the actual cost of publishing, recording, mailing and posting notice of the sale; (b) the cost of any search and/or other evidence of title procured in connection with such sale and revenue stamps on the Trustee's deed; (c) all sums expended under the terms hereof, not then repaid; (d) all other sums then secured hereby; and (e) the remainder, if any, to the person or persons legally entitled thereto; 17. The Beneficiary may from time to time substitute a successor or successors to the Trustee named herein or acting hereunder to execute this Deed of Trust. Upon such appointment, and without conveyance to the successor trustee, the latter shall be vested with all title, pourers, and duties conferred upon the Trustee herein named or acting hereunder. Each such appointment and substitution shall be made by written instrument executed by the Beneficiary, containing reference to this Deed of Trust and its place of record, which, when duly recorded in the proper office of the county or counties in which the Property is situated, shall be conclusive proof of proper appointment of the successor trustee; 18. The pleading of any statute of limitations as a defense to any and all obligations secured by this Deed of Trust is hereby waived to the fullest extent permissible by law; 19. At such time as the obligations secured herby are paid in full (or become no longer repayable) and the obligations under the Regulatory Agreement have been performed- and the term thereof has expired, the Beneficiary may submit a written request stating that all obligations secured hereby have been paid or forgiven, and upon surrender of this Deed of Trust and the Regulatory Agreement to the Trustee for cancellation and retention and upon payment of its fees, the Trustee shall reconvey, without warranty, the property then held hereunder. The recitals in such reconveyance of any matters of fact shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. The grantee in such reconveyance may be described as "the person or persons legally entitled thereto;" 20. The trust created hereby is irrevocable by the Trustor; 21. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and binds all parties hereto, their heirs, legatees, devisees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. The term "the Beneficiary" shall include not only the original Beneficiary hereunder but also any future owner and holder, including pledgees of the Note secured hereby. In this Deed of Trust, whenever the context so requires, the masculine gender includes the feminine and/or neuter, and the singular number includes the,plural; 22. The Trustee accepts this trust when this Deed of Trust, duly executed and acknowledged, is made public record as provided by law_ Except as otherwise provided by law the Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under this Deed of -5- Trust or of any action or proceeding in which the Trustor, the Beneficiary, or the Trustee shall be a party unless brought by the Trustee;. 23. The Trustor agrees at any time and from time to time upon receipt of a written request from the Beneficiary, to furnish to the Beneficiary a detailed statement in writing of income, rents, profits and operating expenses of the Property, and the names of the occupants in possession, together with full information regarding all purchase and sale and occupancy agreements, and such other information regarding the Property and its use as may be requested by the Beneficiary; 24. The Trustor shall permit the Beneficiary and its agents or representatives to inspect the Property at any and all reasonable times with or without advance notice. Inspections shall be conducted so as not to interfere with the occupants' use and enjoyment of the Property; 25. For purposes of this Deed of Trust, "Hazardous Materials" shall mean any substance, chemical, compound or mixture which is (or contains or is the decomposition product of any substance, chemical compound, or mixture which is): (a) a "Hazardous Substance," "Hazardous Material," "Hazardous Waste," or "Toxic Substance" under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601, et 54., the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C, §§ 1801, et s_eg., or the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901, et seq.; (b) an "Extremely Hazardous Waste," a "Hazardous Waste," or a "Restricted Hazardous Waste," under §§ 25115, 25117 or 25122.7 of the California Health and Safety Code, or is listed or identified pursuant to §§ 25140 or 44321 of the California Health and Safety Code; (c) a "Hazardous Material," "Hazardous Substance," "Hazardous Waste," "Toxic Air Contaminant," or "Medical Waste" under §§ 25281, 25316, 25501, 25501,1, 25023.2 or 39655 of the California Health and Safety Code; (d) "Oil" or a "Hazardous Substance" listed or identified pursuant to § 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321, as well as any other hydrocarbonic substance or by-product; (e) Iisted or defined as a "Hazardous Waste," "Extremely Hazardous Waste," or an "Acutely Hazardous Waste" pursuant to Chapter 11 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations; ( listed by the State of California as a chemical known by the State to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity pursuant to § 25249.9(a) of the California Health and Safety Code; (g) a material which due to its characteristics or interaction with one or more other substances, chemical compounds, or mixtures, damages or threatens to damage, M health, safety, or the environment, or is required by any law or public agency to be remediated, including remediation which such law or public agency requires in order for the Property to be put to any lawful purpose; (h) any material whose presence would require remediation pursuant to the guidelines set forth in the State of California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Field Manual, whether or not the presence of such material resulted from a leaking underground fuel tank; (i) pesticides regulated under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 136 et seq.; (j) asbestos, PCBs, and other substances regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq.; (k) any radioactive material including, without limitation, any "source material," special nuclear material," "by-product material," "low-level wastes," "high-level radioactive waste," "spent nuclear fuel," or "transuranic waste," and any other radioactive materials or radioactive wastes, however produced, regulated under the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2011 et siN., the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, 42 U,S.C. §§ 10101 et s. ear ., or pursuant to the California Radiation Control Law, California Health and Safety Code §§ 25800 et set r:1 (1) regulated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651 et or the California Occupational Safety and Health Act, California Labor Code §§ et seq.; and/or (m) regulated under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. or pursuant to Division 26 of the California Health and Safety Code; 26. In addition to the general and specific representations, covenants and warranties set forth in this Deed of Trust or otherwise, the Trustor represents, covenants and warrants, with respect to Hazardous Materials, as follows: a. Neither the Trustor nor, to the best knowledge of the Trustor, any other person, has ever caused or permitted any Hazardous Materials to be manufactured, placed, held, Iocated or disposed of on, under or at the Property or any part thereof, and neither the Property nor any part thereof or any property adjacent thereto has ever been used (whether by the Trustor or, to the best knowledge of the Trustor, by any other person) as a manufacturing site, dump site or storage site (whether permanent or temporary) for any Hazardous Materials; b. The Trustor hereby agrees to indemnify the Beneficiary, its officers, employees, contractors and agents, and hold the Beneficiary, its officers, employees, contractors and agents harmless from and against any and all tosses, liabilities, damages, injuries, costs, expenses and claims of any and every kind whatsoever paid, incurred or suffered by, or asserted against the Beneficiary, its officers, employees, contractors or agents for, with respect to, or as a direct or indirect -7- result of, the presence or use, generation, storage, release, threatened release or disposal of Hazardous Materials- on or -under the Property after the date hereof or the escape, seepage, Ieakage, spillage, discharge, emission or release of any Hazardous Materials from the Property after the date hereof (including, without limitation, any losses, liabilities, damages, injuries, costs, expenses or claims asserted or arising under CERCLA, any so-called "Superfund" or "Superlien" law, or any other federal, state or local statute, Iaw, ordinance, code, rule, regulation, order or decree regulating, relating to or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning any Hazardous Materials), regardless of whether or not caused by, or within the control of the Trustor; C. The Trustor has not received any notice. of: (i) the happening of any event involving the use, spillage, discharge or cleanup of any Hazardous Materials ("Hazardous Discharge") affecting the Trustor or the Property; or (ii) any complaint, order, citation or notice with regard to air emissions, water discharges, noise emissions or any other environmental, health or safety matter affecting the Trustor or the Property ("Environmental Complaint") from any person or entity, including, without limitation, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"). If the Trustor receives any such notice after the date hereof, then the Trustor shall give, within seven (7) business days thereafter, oral and written notice of same to the Beneficiary; d. Without limitation of the Beneficiary's rights under this Deed of Trust, the Beneficiary shall have the right, but not the obligation, to enter onto the Property or to take such other actions as it deems necessary or advisable to clean up, remove, resolve or minimize the impact of, or otherwise deal with, any such Hazardous Materials or Hazardous Discharge upon its receipt of any notice from any person or entity, including without limitation, the EPA, asserting the existence of any Hazardous Materials or an Environmental Complaint on or pertaining to the Property which, if true, could result in an order, suit or other action against the Trustor affecting any part of the Property by any governmental agency or otherwise which, in the sole opinion of the Beneficiary, could jeopardize its security under this Deed of Trust. All reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the Beneficiary in the exercise of any such rights shall be secured by this Deed of Trust and shall be payable by the Trustor upon demand, together with interest thereon at a rate equal to the highest rate payable under applicable law; e. The foregoing representations, covenants, indemnities and warranties shall be continuing and shall be true and correct for the period from the date hereof to the date of the full release and reconveyance of this Deed of Trust (whether by payment of the indebtedness secured hereby or foreclosure or action in lieu thereof), and these representations, covenants, indemnities and warranties shall survive such release and reconveyance. All expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs and allowances) incurred in connection with an action to foreclose, or the exercise of any other remedy provided by this Deed of Trust, including the curing of any default or Event of Default, shall be the responsibility of the Trustor. "TRUSTOR": THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE LLC, a California limite 1' bility company By: Wil lam R. Dalton, Mana ing tuber By: C , Todd W. Dalton, Managing Member I Us ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of kvlpl�� On before me, —f j (insert name and title of the ❑ffi r) personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)-Fs/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that,hei6h /they executed the same in Wis her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by laWher/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal, UICKI L. PETERSEN 'n0�" CoMM.# 1733339IYE&SIOE comy � ul RSignature (Seal) a a�l>a. EXP. MAA- 22. 2or} Signature of Notary Public ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of On before me, (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) Signature of Notary Public 1 1087-0021\1214431 v l.doc Old: 1071129. 1 ; New: 1071129.2 STEWART TITLE -Riverside Recording Requested By and when recorded return to: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Clerk DOC # 2010-0223771 05/14/2010 08:00R Fee:NC Page 1 of 16 Recorded in Official Records County of Riverside Larry W. Ward Assessor, County Clerk & Recorder IIIIIII IIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111111111 IT IN U I PAGE SIZE DA I MISC LONGT RFD COPY L A I L 465 1 426 PCOR NCOR SMF NCI•IG (EXANr T: CTY UNI F—✓ Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 REGULATORY AGREEMENT 0�i 01* THIS REGULATORY AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), is entered into as of May 12, 2010, by and between THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE LLC, a California limited liability company (hereinafter "Owner"), and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic (hereinafter the "Agency"). RECITALS A. On June 12, 1988, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside adopted Ordinance No. 658 adopting and approving the "Redevelopment Plan for Riverside County Redevelopment ;Project No, 1-1988" (hereafter the "Plan") in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. On December 1, 1989, the City of Temecula was incorporated. The boundaries of the Project Area described in the Plan are entirely within the boundaries of the City of Temecula. On April 9, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Ordinance Nos. 91-08, 91-11, 91-14, and 91-15 establishing the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan from the County to the City. Pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 91-11 and 91-15, the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula assumed jurisdiction over the Plan as of July 1, 1991. B. Agency desires to effectuate the provisions of the Housing Element of the General Plan of the City of Temecula by providing affordable housing set -aside funds of the Agency to expand the supply of housing affordable to moderate and lower income people. C. Owner owns that certain real property (the "Property") described on Exhibit "A", erence herein. Owner has developed a 32 unit apartment attached hereto and incorporated by ref project on the Property (the "Project") which includes nineteen (19) one -bedroom apartment units, twelve (12) two -bedroom townhame units and one (1) two -bedroom apartment unit (said 32 units being hereinafter referred to as the "Units"). D. The Agency requires that the Units be leased only to lower and moderate income households at an affordable rent. In order to help the Owner obtain and then repay the construction loan used to construct the Units, Agency has agreed to make Owner a conditional grant from the Agency's affordable housing set -aside funds in the amount of $6,000,000 Said document signed in counter parts 1I087-0026\1214432YI.doc Old: 1071 104.2; New: 1071104.3 (hereinafter the "Grant"), pursuant to that certain Owner Participation Agreement dated August 12, 2008, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Owner Participation Agreement dated February 24, 2009 and that certain First Amendment to Irrevocable Loan Commitment dated February 24, 2009, and that certain "Second Amendment to Owner Participation Agreement and Irrevocable Commitment" dated February 9, 2010 (the "OPA"). E. As an inducement to Agency to enter into the OPA and make the Grant, Owner has agreed to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, Agency and Owner mutually agree as follows: I. Terra. The terra of this Agreement (the "Term") shall commence on the date of recordation of this Agreement, and shall continue in full force and effect until the 55th anniversary of the date of recordation hereof in the Official Records of the Riverside County Recorder (the "Expiration Date"), 2. Nature of Covenants Reservations and Restrictions. (a) Owner hereby subjects the Property to the covenants, reservations and restrictions set forth in this Agreement for the Term, Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying Owner's interest in the Property, or any portion thereof, including, without limitation, any ]eases, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to this Agreement and the covenants, reservations and restrictions set forth in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such lease, assignment, contract, deed or other instruments. (b) Owner covenants by and for itself, its representatives, its successors and assigns and every successor in interest to the Property or any part thereof, that during construction of the improvements on the Property and thereafter Owner shall not use or permit the use of the Property in violation of the Redevelopment Plan, Owner further covenants and agrees to comply in all respects with the terms, provisions, and obligations of Owner set forth in the OPA. Owner further covenants and agrees that upon completion of the project described in the OPA for the .Property and as further described in the Scope of Development attached to the OPA, Owner shall maintain the Property and improvements thereon (including landscaping) (collectively, the "Project") in the manner of first class residential planned developments, as further described herein and in the OPA. 3. Use and Rental of the Pro ert . Owner covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, assignees, and every successor in interest that the Units shall be restricted as follows: (a) Units Restricted to Persons or Families of Moderate and Lower Income. The twelve (12) two -bedroom townhome units shall be rented exclusively to persons or families whose incomes do not exceed one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the area median income (adjusted for family size appropriate- for the Unit) i.e., moderate income persons or families), and only for use by such persons and families as their principal residence. The nineteen (19) one bedroom apartments and the one (1) two bedroom apartment shall be rented exclusively to persons or families where income do not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the area median income (adjusted for family size appropriate for the Unit) i.e., low income persons or 1 1087-002611214432v l .doc Old: 1071104.2; New: 1071104.3 families), and only for use by such persons and families as their principal residence. Owner shall not permit any transient or commercial use or subletting of the Units except as approved by Agency in writing. Only such persons and households shall be entitled to occupy the Units. (b) Maximum Rents. Owner shall rent the Units at a rent that does not exceed the "affordable rent" (as defined below) that may be charged under California Health & Safety Code Section 50053 (as amended from time to time). Subject to the foregoing limitations, Owner shall be entitled to increase rents one time per year to an amount equal to the maximum amount of "affordable rent" (including a reasonable allowance for utilities) that may be charged under California Health & Safety Code Section 50053 (as amended from time to time). Owner shall submit a request for an increase in rents to Agency for review and approval sixty (60) days prior to each yearly anniversary of the initial occupancy of any Unit in the Project and each year thereafter. (c) Definitions. W "Area median income" shall mean the area median income for Riverside County as published by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50093, or the most closely related successor thereto. (ii) "Affordable rent" means the rent determined under California Health & Safety Code Section 50053 based upon area median income (adjusted for family size appropriate for the Unit) for the Iow or moderate income person or household in question including a reasonable utility allowance, as such Section is amended from time to time. (iii) "Principal residence" means the principal dwelling place a Person or household uses as such person's or household's usual place of return and occupancy. If a person or household fails to reside in and return to such person's or household's unit for at least four (4) days per week for a period of at Ieast nine (9) months out of any twelve (12) month period, then it will be conclusively presumed that the Unit is not the principal residence of that person or household. The terms defined in this Subsection 3(c) are further defined in Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations Section 69I0, e1 5ep., as from time to time amended, and any successor regulations thereto. The terms and provisions of California Health and Safety Code Sections 50093 and 50053 and Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations Section 6910, et seq., as amended, and any successor statutes or regulations thereto, are incorporated herein b this reference, y 4. Ri hts of A enc Prior to the rental of any Unit, Owner shall obtain from the proposed tenant a completed income computation and certification form, in such form as may be approved by the Executive Director of the Agency, and shall verify the income of the proposed tenant. Owner shall verify the proposed tenant's income by standard and customary income verification procedures and practices used for determining eligibility for income qualifying housing. In addition to its rights under Section 9 below, Agency shall have the continuing right during the Term hereof to require from the Owner and the tenants' information 1 1087-0026\ 121443 2 v 1. d oc Old: 1071104.2; New: 1071104.3 and evidence necessary or convenient to verify that the restrictions, limitations and requirements Of Section 3 are being complied with and to establish and/or continue an affordable housing program at the Property. Covenants and Obligations. (a) Insurance. Owner covenants to keep all improvements from time to time existing on the Property insured against perils included within the general classifications as "fire," "extended coverage," "vandalism," "malicious mischief," and "special extended perils," and all such insurance shall be evidenced by a standard fire and extended coverage insurance policy or policies in an amount not less than the full replacement cost of the improvements (not including the costs of foundation concrete and excavation that would not have to be incurred upon replacement of the improvements). In addition, Owner shall maintain and have in full force and effect, during the term of this Agreement, a "Broad Form Commercial General Liability" insurance policy in a combined single limit of $3 million dollars. Such policies shall be endorsed with a standard mortgagee clause listing Agency as loss payee (in the case of the extended coverage -insurance) and an additional insured (in the case of the liability insurance). A copy of any insurance binders or certificates of insurance shall be provided to Agency in conjunction with the accounting described in Section 9(b) herein. Said policies shall provide that they cannot be canceled or terminated without thirty (30) days prior written notice to Agency. To the extent that the provision hereof are inconsistent with the insurance requirements of the Agency Documents, the provisions of the Agency Documents shall control. (b) Corn fiance with BuiIdin and Health and Safet Codes. Owner covenants that the Property shall be maintained in conformance with applicable health, building, and safety codes. Owner further covenants that any construction, renovation, repair or rehabilitation of the improvements shall be undertaken in compliance with all building codes of the City of Temecula applicable at the time of such construction, renovation, repair or rehabilitation. (c) ObIi ation to Refrain from Discrimination. Owner covenants that there shall be no discrimination against any person, or group of persons, on account of sex, sexual orientation, marital status, race, color, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Property, or any part thereof, and Owner (or any person or entity claiming under or through Owner) covenants and agrees not to establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants or sublessees of the Property or any part thereof. Owner also agrees to refrain from any form of discrimination as set forth above pertaining to deeds, leases or contracts. (d) Form of Nondiscrimination and No re ation Clauses. All deeds, leases or contracts entered into by Owner that relate to the site or any portion thereof shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses: 0) In deeds: "The grantee herein covenants by and for and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group or persons on account of any basis listed in subdivision (a) or 1 1087-0026\ 1214432v l .doc Old: 1071 104.2; New: 1071104.3 A of Section 12955 of the California Government Code, as those bases are defined in Sections 12926, 12926, 1, subdivision (m) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section 12955, and Section 12955.2 of the California Government Code, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee himself, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the land herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding paragraph, with respect to familial status, said paragraph shall not be construed to apply to housing for older persons, as defined in Section 12955.9 of the California Government Code. With respect to familial status, nothing in said paragraph shall be construed to affect Sections 51.2, 51.3, 51.4, 51.10, 51.11, and 799.5 of the California Civil Code, relating to housing for senior citizens. Subdivision (d) of Section 51 and Section 1360 of the California Civil Code and subdivisions (n), (o) and (p) of Section 12955 of the California Government Code shall apply to said paragraph." 00 In leases: "The lessee herein covenants by and for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him, and that this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group or persons on account of any basis listed in subdivision (a) or (d) of Section 12955 of the California Government Code, as those bases are defined in Sections 12926, 12926.1, subdivision (m) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section 12955, and Section 12955.2 of the California Government Code, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, or enjoyment of the land herein leased nor shall the lessee himself, or any person claiming under or through hire, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the land herein leased. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding paragraph, with respect to familial status, said paragraph shall not be construed to apply to housing for older persons, as defined in Section 12955.9'of the California Government Code. With respect to familial status; nothing in said paragraph shall be construed to affect Sections 51.2, 51.3, S1.4, 51.10, 51.11, and 799.5 of the California Civil Code, relating to housing for senior citizens. Subdivision (d) of Section 51 and Section 1360 of the California Civil Code and subdivisions (n), (o) and (p) of Section 12955 of the California Government Code shall apply to said paragraph." 610 In contracts: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group or persons on account of any basis listed in subdivision (a) or (d) of Section 12955 of the California Government Code, as those bases are defined in Sections 12926, 12926. 1, subdivision (in) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section I2955, and Section 12955.2 of the California Government Code, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land, nor shall the transferee himself or any person claiming under or through him, establish or permit any such practice or practices of l 1087-0026\1214432v 1.doc 5 Old: 1071104.2; New: 1071 104.3 discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the land. !Notwithstanding the immediately preceding respect to familial status, said paragraph shall not be construed to apply o bou sing or older Pe as defined in Section 12955.9 of the California Government Cade. With respect to familial status, nothing in said paragraph shall be construed to affect Sections 51.2, 51.3, 51.4, e, relating to housing for senio 51.10, 51.11, and 799.5 of the California Civil Codr citizens. Subdivision (d) of Section 51 and Section 1360 of the California Civil Code and subdivisions paragraph." (n), (o) and (p) of Section 12955 of the California Governme nt Code shall apply to said (e) Duration of Covenants and Obli ations. The covenants and obligations contained in Sections 3(a), 3(b) and 5(a) shall remain in effect until the expiration of the Term, and the covenants against discrimination provided for in subsections 5(b), 5(c) and 5(d) shall remain in effect in perpetuity. 6• Mana ernent of the Im rovements. (a) Manager. The Project shall at all times be managed by an experienced manager (the "Manager") reasonably acceptable to the Agency, with demonstrated ability to operate residential developments like the Project in a manner that will provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing. The Owner shall submit for the Agency's approval the identity of any Proposed Manager. The Owner shall also submit such additional informatio background, experience; and financial condition of any proposed n about the is reasonably Manager as necessary for the Agency to determine whether the proposed Manager meets the standard for a qualified Manager set forth above. If the proposed Manager meets the standard for a qualified Manager set forth above, the Agency shall approve the proposed Manager by notifying Owner in writing. (b) Performance Review. The Owner shall cooperate with the Agency in an annual review of management practices, in connection with which the Agency shall have the right to review and approve the annual operations and management budget; provided, however, that the Agency reserves the right to conduct reviews more frequently at its sole discretion. The Purpose of each annual review will be to enable the Agency to determine if the Improvements are being operated and managed in accordance with the requirements and standards of this Agreement. (c) Re [acement of Mana e:r. as a result of the annual review, the Agency determines in its reasonable judgment that the Improvements are not being operated and managed in accordance with any of the requirements and standards of this Agreement, the Agency shall deliver notice to the Owner of its intention to cause replacement of the Manager. Within fifteen (15) days of receipt by the Owner of such written notice, the Agency and the Owner shall meet in good faith to consider methods for improving the financial and operating status of the Project including, without limitation, replacement of the Manager, 1 1087-0026\1214432v l .doc Old: 1071104.2; New: 1071104.3 6 00 If, after such meeting, the Agency elects to proceed with the replacement of the Manager, the Agency shall so notify the Owner in writing within fifteen (15) days following the meeting. Thereupon, the Owner shall promptly dismiss the then Manager, and shall appoint as the Manager a person or entity meeting the standards for a Manager set forth in this section and approved by the Agency pursuant to this section. Agency shall have the right to disapprove the replacement Manager within thirty (30) days, and in such case Owner shall promptly dismiss the replacement Manager, and Agency may, at its option, appoint the Manager. (iii) Any contract for the operation or management of the Property entered into by the Owner shall provide that the contract can be terminated as set forth above. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a limitation on any other provision herein entitling Agency to replace the Manager under any other circumstances. (d) The Owner agrees that the Project shall be preserved and maintained throughout the term hereof in good condition and repair so as to provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing, and in conformance with all applicable ordinances, statutes and regulations promulgated by any governmental entity having jurisdiction over the Project. (e) Annual dnspection. Subject to the rights of the occupants of the Units, Agency shall have the right to perform an annual on -site inspection of the units, common areas and grounds and to perform an annual tenant file review to ensure that Owner is managing the Project in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. (f) Annual Bud et. Owner shall submit or shall cause its Property Manager to submit to the Agency's Executive Director on or before the completion of the Project, and each anniversary thereof, an annual budget for the ongoing operation of the project for approval by Agency, which will not be unreasonably withheld. At the Agency's request, delivered within thirty (30) days after receipt of the budget, each of Owner and the Agency shall cause its respective representative(s) to meet within thirty (30) days following the receipt of request to review the budget. Such review is without obligation to either party to propose or agree to any modification of permitted operating expenses. (g) Management of Property. Owner shall be completely responsible for the management, administration and operation of the Project including, but not limited to the hiring and discharge of employees, salaries and all other related Project expenses, maintenance and repairs, including capital expenditures, tine financial operations of the Project, the rental and re -rental of the apartment units in accordance with the occupancy requirements set forth in this Agreement and all operational, maintenance and management responsibilities of an owner in a typical multi -family residential housing project. (h) Reserves. The Owner will maintain operating and replacement reserves satisfactory to the Agency and will not withdraw funds from such reserves without the consent of the Agency, which will not be unreasonably withheld. management agency appointed by Owner for management ofevent the theProject o'ect fails to J perform the 11087-0026\1214432v1.doc Old: 1071104.2; New: 107.1 104.3 obligations imposed upon Owner by this Section 6, such failure shall constitute a default under Section 10 hereof, and if Owner shall fail to cure such default as provided in Section 10 hereof, then Agency shall have the right, in addition to any other remedies of Agency, to require Owner, upon thirty (30) days' prior written notice, to appoint a substitute management agency, reasonably acceptable to both Agency and Owner. 7. Indemnification. Owner shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for and hold Agency, and its respective elected and appointed officers and employees, harmless from all costs (including attorneys' fees and costs), claims, demands, liabilities, and judgments for injury or damage to property and injuries to persons, including death, which may be related to the Property or caused by any of Owner's activities under this Agreement, whether such activities or performance thereof be by Owner or anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by Owner and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement, This indemnity includes, but is not limited to, any repair, cleanup, remediation, detoxification, or preparation and implementation of any removal, remedial, response, closure or other plan (regardless of whether undertaken due to governmental action) concerning any hazardous substance or hazardous wastes including petroleum and its fractions as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et sec .1, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ["RCRA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seg.] and California Health and Safety Code Section Code Section 25280 et sLeq on the Property or at any place where Owner owns or has control of real property pursuant to any of Owner's activities under this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity is intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107(e) of CERCLA and California Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to assure, protect, hold harmless and indemnify Agency from liability. This indemnity shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason. This indemnity shall not be construed in any way to be a limitation on Owner's indemnity obligations under the OPA. 8. Com liance. with Local State and Federal Laws. Owner shall carry out the provisions of this Agreement and own and operate the Project in conformity with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations including, without limitation, all regulations and conditions of funding with respect to Housing Set -Aside Funds under Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2 (as amended from time to time). 9. Accounting_to Agency. (a) The books and accounts of the Project shall be kept in conformity with generally accepted accounting practices. (b) Owner shall submit to Agency annually, on or before May I of each calendar year, a report setting forth the rental rate of all Units and the income and number of known occupants of all Units. The income information required by this Section shall be supplied by the tenants of the Units in a certified statement on a forth from time to time provided by Agency. ) Owner shall provide operations of the Projectshowing therent and periods of time each Unitstatements was rented. The fir st l 1087-0026N 1214432v l .doc Old: 1071104.2; New: 1071 104.3 accounting period for which such statements shall be provided shall end on the last day of the month in which all of the Units have been initially rented to the first occupants, the accounting shall be made to Agency within 30 days of such date, but need not be audited. Thereafter, annual audited financial statements shall be prepared annually for each calendar year, and such audited financial statements shall be delivered to the Agency by April 1 of the following calendar year. (d) Owner shall maintain a complete and accurate rent roll listing all Units, and the names of all tenants, the dates of their tenancies and the amounts of rents and security deposits charged and collected. (e) Agency, its agents and employees, shall have the right, after reasonable notice, to review and inspect, at reasonable times during business hours, the books, records and accounts of Owner specifically regarding the property, from and after the date of the recordation of this Agreement and until the expiration of this Agreement, (f) Owner shall retain all documents and records pertaining to the rents charged, income of tenants and all matters relating to Owner's obligations under Section 3 of this Agreement for a period of three (3) years and make shall them available to Agency on five (5) business days' prior notice, provided however that if the provisions of any federal or state law or regulation requires a longer period of retention, Owner shall comply with such period or retention. (g) Agency may conduct audits of the rents charged, income of tenants and all matters relating to Owner's obligations under this Agreement and within three (3) years - after the last day of the applicable period to which such records relate, and Owner shall cooperate with the Agency's auditors in conducting the audit. Such audits shall not occur more frequently than once each year. Agency shall pay for the costs of the audit unless the audit reveals that Owner did not materially comply with the provisions of this Agreement, in which case, Owner shall pay all costs of the audit. 10. Deed of Trust; Conditional Grant; Violation of Regulatory Agreement and/or Deed of Trust by Owner. (a) The Regulatory Agreement is secured by a Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (with Assignment of Rents) dated concurrently (or substantially concurrently) herewith executed by Owner, as trustor, in favor of Agency, as beneficiary. (b) Upon an Event of Default (as defined below) under this Agreement occurs, then Owner shall immediately repay the Grant to Agency. (c) The occurrence of a default Linder -that continues after any required notice is given by the Agency and any applicable cure period has expired, and Owner's failure to cure a default under this Agreement as permitted under Section 10(b) below, shall each constitute an "Event of Default" under this Agreement. (d) If a default under this Agreement occurs, Agency shall give written notice thereof to Owner by registered mail addressed to Owner at the address stated in this 11087-002611214432v 1,doc 9 Old: 1071104.2; New: 1071104.3 Agreement, or to such other address as may have been designated by Owner. If such violation is not cured within thirty (30) days after the date such notice is received, or if such violation is a non -monetary obligation that cannot reasonably be cured within such thirty (30) day period, then if Owner fails to commence to cure such violation within said thirty (30) day period or fails diligently to prosecute such cure to completion as soon as reasonably possible but, in not event, no later than three (3) calendar months after receipt of notice of such violation, then Agency may without farther notice, declare in writing a default under this Agreement effective on the date of such declaration of default. (e) Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default under this Agreement, Agency may apply to any court, State or Federal, for specific performance of this Agreement for an injunction against any violation by Owner of this Agreement or of the Agency Documents, and/or for the appointment of a receiver to take over and operate the Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or the Agency Documents, or for such other relief as may be appropriate, including without limitation damages, and the cost to Agency in enforcing the terms of this Agreement (including the reasonable time expended by Agency staff, consultants, auditors, attorneys and other personnel involved in such enforcement}. The remedies is Agency herein, or under any other instrument providing for or evidencing the financial assistance Provided herein, are cumulative, and the exercise of one or more of such remedies shall not be deemed an election of all remedies and shall not preclude the exercise by Agency of any one or more of its other remedies. (t) Agency shall provide by mail copies of any notice of any violation to all other lien holders who have delivered a request therefor to the Agency and have also recorded a Request for Special Notice in accordance with California Civil Code Section 2924e (as amended), at the address for notices most recently provided by Owner or such lien holders for such notices, and such parties shall have the same right to cure Owner's defaults hereunder on behalf of Owner. 11. General Provisions. (a) The covenants which have been established pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed to be covenants running with the land for the benefit of the Project Area and Agency in carrying out its statutory responsibilities under California Redevelopment Act (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et sec .) to implement the Redevelopment Plan and to provide for the development of low and moderate income housing in the community. The covenants hereof shall be binding upon the Property and run for the benefit of the Project Area and Agency and its successors and assigns, and such covenants shall run in favor of Agency for the entire period during which such covenants shall be in force and effectregard to , without whether Agency is or remains an owner of any land or interest therein to which such covenants relate. Agency is deemed the beneficiary of the terms and provisions of this Agreement and of the covenants running with the land, for and in its own rights and for the purposes of protecting the interests of the community and other parties, public or private, in whose favor and for whose benefit this Agreement and the covenants running with the land have been provided. Only Agency and its successors in interest may enforce this Agreement; nothing herein is intended to create any third party beneficiaries to this Agreement, and no person or entity other than Agency or Owner, and the permitted successors and assigns of either of them, shall be authorized to 11087-002611214432v Ldoc 10 Old: 1071 104.2; New: 1071104.3 enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The tenants of the Property are not intended to be third party beneficiaries hereunder. (b) This Agreement and the covenants reservations, restrictions and agreements contained herein shall be a burden upon the Property and shall bind Owner, its successors and assigns with respect to the Property. Owner may not assign any of the benefits of this Agreement, or delegate any of Owner's obligations hereunder, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of Agency. (c) Agency and its successors and assigns, and Owner and its successors and assigns, shall have the right to consent and agree to changes in, or to eliminate in whole or in part, any of the covenants, reservations and restrictions contained in this Agreement. (d) This Agreement (and the OPA and Deed of Trust) represent the entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and may not be altered or amended except by writing executed between the parties to be charged. (e) In any action between the parties to interpret, enforce, reform, modify, rescind, or otherwise in connection with any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the Prevailing party in the action shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled, reasonable costs and expenses including, without limitation, litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. M If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any circumstance, shall, at any time or to any extent, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the application thereof to circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and each term, covenant, condition and provision of this Agreement, shall be valid and enforceable, to the fullest extent permitted by law. The use of the plural the singular shall include)the plural, and the l use of one n this Aggender shall reement hbeldeemed to incIude all include the singuiand genders. (h) Time is of the essence hereof. (i) No waiver by Agency of any breach of or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 0) This Agreement and all related documents shall be deemed to be contracts made and delivered in the State of California and shall be governed and construed and interpreted in accordance with convenience only and shall not influence any construction or interpretation, the laws of said State. Headings and titles herein are for 1 1087-0026\1214432v I .doc 1 1 Old: 1071104.2; New: 1071104.3 (k) Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be given by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, at the addresses specified below, or at such other addresses as may be specified in writing by the parties hereto as follows. - If to Agency: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attn.: Executive Director Tel.: (909) 694-6444 Fax: (909) 694-1999 With a copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon 355 South Grand Ave., 40`h Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Attn.: Peter Thorson Tel.: (213) 626-8484 Fax: (213) 626-0078 If to Owner, to: The Warehouse at Creekside LLC 41911 5th Street, Suite 302 Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: William Dalton (1) This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in multiple counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, and each of which shale, be deemed to be an original. l 1087-002611214432v l.doc 12 Old: 1071104.2; New: 1071104.3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Regulatory Agreement as of the day and year first above written. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic Attest: Mike Naggar, Chai Susan W_Anes Secretary Approved as t Form: RICHARD , WATSON & GERSHON, a profess' nal corporation n. Peter Thorson, Agency Counsel 11087-0026\1214432vl.doc 13 Old: 1071 104.2; New: 1071104.3 THE WAREHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE LLC, a California limited is 'lity company By; William R. Dalton, Managing Member B y; odd W.. Dalton, Managing Member S-, 5 f, j Co L-k ^ -Cr P --F ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of On I �z.�P before me, �1 _i r r '� t. (insert name and title -of the officer) personally appeared t t _ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that*efsle/they executed the same in Ws/faeritheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his� r/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature —/�Signature of Notary Public State of California County of On personally appeared before me, _ MKI L. PETERSEN (Seal) COMA.# 1733339 r� V1 '® °NOTARY PUBLIC • CAUFORHM Vi RivERmE CouRry Mr COW UP. MAR. 22. = ACKNOWLEDGMENT (insert name and title of the officer) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature _ (Seal) Signature of Notary Public 1 1087-002611214432v 1.doc 14 Old: 1071104.2; New; 1071104.3 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California County of Riverside, City of Temecula, and described as follows: Parcel(s) 1 of Parcel Map No. 36055, as shown by map on file in Book 230 Page(s) 52-54, inclusive, of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California, Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: October 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 - 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 7:00 PM: Mayor Maryann Edwards INVOCATION: Aaron Adam, City Manager FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Presentation by General Manager Robert Grantham of Rancho California Water District Certificate of Recognition to Lariah Gill - 2021 IMMAF Youth MMA World Championship Proclamation for Dyslexia Awareness Month Proclamation for Fire Prevention Week BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Planning Commission and Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT Riverside County Sheriffs Department PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council on non-agendized item(s): • Bob Kowell • Eric Bunge • Gillian Larson • Greta Pontarelli • Larry Slusser The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment non-agendized item(s): • Brigette Green The following individual(s) addressed the City Council on agendized item(s): • Bob Kowell (Item #10) • Dale Borgeson (Item #11) The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment agendized item(s): • Dana Kizlaitis (Presentation) • Cindy Kennedy (Item #10) • Martha Angelica Howard (Item #9) • Rick Reiss (Item #10) • Tami Sims (Item #9) • Suzanne Lane (Item #10) • Ira Robinson (Item #9) 0 Jeff Pack (Item #10) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2. Approve Action Minutes of September 14, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of September 14, 2021. 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4. Approve Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide, Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road, PW 19-08 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide, Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road, PW 19-08; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement; and 3. Appropriate $227,337 in Reimbursement revenue and Construction costs to Capital Improvement Project 210.265.655 - Pavement Rehabilitation Program -Citywide. 5. Receive and File Temporary Street Closures for 2021 Autumnfest Events Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the temporary closure of certain streets for the following 2021 Autumnfest Events: State of the City 2 COVID Flag Remembrance Ceremony Halloween Carnival Veterans Day Old Town Christmas Tree Install RECESS: At 9:02 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting and the Successor Agency of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Meeting. At 9:09 PM the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 8. Approve Resolution to Amend the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)Program Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion Rahn, Second by Alexander. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 9. Conduct a Public Hearing for the Purposes of Redistricting in the City of Temecula Recommendation: That the City Council conduct the second of four public hearings for the purposes of redistricting in the City of Temecula. Conducted public hearing, no action. BUSINESS 10. Approve City Council Protocol Manual Policies (At the Request of Mayor Edwards and Mayor Pro Tem Rahn) Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE CITY COUNCIL PROTOCOL MANUAL AND ADOPTING FIVE CITY COUNCIL POLICIES GOVERNING THE OPERATIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3 Approved the Staff Recommendation (3-2): Motion Rahn, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Alexander and Stewart opposing. 2. Introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2021-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT CONDUCT AT CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS THAT ACTUALLY DISRUPTS, DISTURBS OR OTHERWISE IMPEDES THE ORDERLY CONDUCT OF MEETINGS Approved the Staff Recommendation (3-2): Motion Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Alexander and Stewart opposing. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS — Receive and file 11. Community Development Department Monthly Report 12. Fire Department Monthly Report 13. Police Department Monthly Report 14. Public Works Department Monthly Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 9:56 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, October 12, 2021, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 4 Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: October 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve List of Demands PREPARED BY: Tricia Hawk, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $7,973,537.65. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 12th day of October, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 12th day of October, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 09/16/2021 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 3,180,887.36 09/23/2021 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 4,251,076.72 09/16/2021 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 541,573.57 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 10/12/2021 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 7,973,537.65 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 4,242,237.47 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 13,617.86 165 RDA DEV LOW/MOD 20% SET ASIDE 1,872.29 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 272,121.65 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 309.80 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 11,191.57 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 31,289.97 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 2,646,691.75 300 INSURANCE FUND 17,490.98 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 3,707.30 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 81,019.74 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 6,076.75 340 FACILITIES 82,426.83 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE 5.02 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 5.02 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 14.97 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 5.02 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 15.10 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 10.04 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 23.97 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAND 1,331.04 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 0.10 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 22.22 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 15.47 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 133.30 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 5.40 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 0.10 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 81.83 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 1,529.34 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE 131.39 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 24.73 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 184.37 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 1,103.17 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 153.32 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 4,357.67 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 136.21 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 4,772.48 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 51.65 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 3.73 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 0.10 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 7,773.73 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 19.63 $ 7,431,964.08 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 328,243.24 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 475.88 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,719.58 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 148,498.56 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,348.73 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 571.98 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 3,095.39 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,599.92 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1,994.34 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 36,122.18 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 4,502.42 340 FACILITIES 7,751.98 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 28.07 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 28.07 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 84.42 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 28.07 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 84.22 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 56.18 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 0.06 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 0.59 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 0.59 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 0.59 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 0.59 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 0.59 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 0.06 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 287.54 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 0.06 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 0.59 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 0.06 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 143.75 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 14.36 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 0.06 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 0.06 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 14.36 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 0.06 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 86.21 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 120.71 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 287.59 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 546.40 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 0.06 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 0.83 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 230.05 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 28.70 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 0.06 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 0.59 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 575.13 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 0.04 TOTAL BY FUND: 541,573.57 $ 7,973,537.65 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 09/14/2021 2:21:18PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 501041 9/16/2021 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES SEP STAND BY FEE: POLICE AFN 501042 9/16/2021 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO SEP DRINKING WTR MAINT: PD STOREFRONT AUG DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: THEATI 501043 9/16/2021 021400 AYERS ELECTRIC INC ELECTRICAL LABOR: OFC RELOCATE: HR ELECTRICAL LABOR: OFC RELOCATE: H 501044 9/16/2021 018941 AZTEC LANDSCAPING INC JUL MAINT SVCS: PARKS/SCHOOLS PW AUG MAINT SVCS: PARKS/SCHOOLS PVC 501045 9/16/2021 022519 BUREAU VERITAS TECHNICAL, FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT - ASSESSMENTS LLC PW 501046 9/16/2021 016688 CALIFORNIA WATERSHED ENG DSGN SVCS: FLOOD CONTROL CORP, DBACWE CHANNEL PW11-10 501047 9/16/2021 017542 COX, KRISTI LYN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 501048 9/16/2021 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & FIRE MAINT INSPECTION: CIVIC CTR HVAC INC MISC PLUMBING REPAIRS: FOC FIRE MAINT INSPECTION: TVE2 KITCHEN HOOD INSPECTION: MPSC KITCHEN HOOD INSPECTION: CRC FIRE MAINT INSPECTION: CIVIC CTR 501049 9/16/2021 020436 CRONBERG, RICHARD N TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 501050 9/16/2021 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL ADARESTROOM: MORAGARD SRVCS ADA RESTROOM: MORAGA RD TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC 501051 9/16/2021 019720 DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES JUL WTR QUALITY MAINT:DUCK INC PND/HARV. 501052 9/16/2021 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 501053 9/16/2021 020904 ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES INC JUL CONDENSER WTR SYS PM: CIVIC CTR 501054 9/16/2021 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT AUG '21 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADM IN: INC WRKRS COM Amount Paid 1,379.17 61.96 28.28 3,000.00 1,600.00 9,766.50 9,766.50 20,298.96 609.72 579.60 1,900.00 848.21 775.00 532.00 532.00 160.00 140.00 325.76 325.76 95.00 95.00 7,213.00 745.38 538.67 1,250.00 Check Total 1,379.17 90.24 4,600.00 19, 533.00 20,298.96 609.72 579.60 4,747.21 140.00 841.52 7,213.00 745.38 538.67 1,250.00 Page:1 apChkLst 09/14/2021 2:21:18PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 501055 9/16/2021 021308 GILLIS + PANICHAPAN ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: CRC PW19-07 12,340.00 ARCHITECTS, INC ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: FIRE STA 84 PW19-14 6,065.00 18,405.00 501056 9/16/2021 022556 HANSON AGGREGTE PACIFIC VOID-CNSTRCTN CONTRACT: 0.00 0.00 SW LLC, DBAATP GENERAL PAVEMNT REHAB ENG CONTR 501057 9/16/2021 020628 HASA INC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: 357.82 357.82 VARIOUS POOLS 501058 9/16/2021 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC MISC PARTS/SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 612.26 612.26 501059 9/16/2021 021370 MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY DSGN & ENVIRO SVCS: CONG 38,902.18 38,902.18 INC RELIEF,PW19-02 501060 9/16/2021 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC JUL LABOR COMPLIANCE MONITOR 393.00 393.00 SVC:ADA 501061 9/16/2021 019823 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC JUL JANITORIAL SVCS: VARI CITY 23,705.78 23,705.78 FACS 501062 9/16/2021 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING GUARDRAIL/POWDERCOAT LIGHTS: LIBRARY 5,500.00 5,500.00 INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 501063 9/16/2021 012264 MIRANDA, JULIO C 1,486.80 1,486.80 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: TPL 867.50 501064 9/16/2021 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FOC 588.08 INC MISC ELECTRIC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 208.80 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 127.40 MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: WEST WING 66.56 1,858.34 501065 9/16/2021 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J, ART EVENTS: TVM: TCSD 3,600.00 DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS ART EVENTS: TVM: TCSD 400.00 4,000.00 501066 9/16/2021 020946 MUSSON THEATRICAL INC SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES: 509.83 509.83 THEATER 501067 9/16/2021 009337 NV5 INC JUL PROJ MGT SVCS: MRC, PW17-21 19,635.00 19,635.00 501068 9/16/2021 021121 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR 8/20 MEDICAL SCREENING: HR 103.00 OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 8/18 MEDICAL SCREEING: TCSD 32.50 135.50 Paget apChkLst 09/14/2021 2:21:18PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 501069 9/16/2021 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL 7/21-29 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: 6,700.00 MANAGEMENT MURR CRK 8/18-26 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: TEM 6,420.00 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: EMPIRE CRh 2,950.00 8/11-12 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: TEM 2,945.00 8/4-5 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: MURR 2,485.00 8/5 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: TEM CRIN 1,845.00 AUG SHOPPING CART CLEANUP: CITY F 1,774.00 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: MURR CRK 1,665.00 26,784.00 501070 9/16/2021 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CIVIC CENTER 66.31 66.31 LOCKSMITH SRVC 501071 9/16/2021 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 9/2 790.00 790.00 501072 9/16/2021 003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY SERVICE AWARD: HR 94.82 SERVICE AWARD: HR 94.82 189.64 501073 9/16/2021 016311 TIERCE, NICHOLAS AUG GRAPHIC DSGN SRVCS: 4,620.00 4,620.00 THEATER 501074 9/16/2021 021580 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SEPT CONSULTING SRVCS: CITY 6,000.00 6,000.00 INC CLERK 501075 9/16/2021 011351 TRITECH SOFTWARE REPORT WRITING SRVCS: INFO TECH 2,400.00 2,400.00 SYSTEMS 501076 9/16/2021 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE AUG UNDERGRND UTILITY LOCATOR 208.00 ALERT, OF SOUTHERN ALERTS: PW CALIFORNIA AUG DIG SAFE BRD BILLABLE TCKTS: P' 94.30 302.30 501077 9/16/2021 008977 VALLEY EVENTS INC ENTERTAINMENT: AOTW 9/3 400.00 400.00 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 219,620.23 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 09/14/2021 2:21:18PM CITY OF TEMECULA 37 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 219,620.23 Page:4 apChkLst 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 11812 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700025366655 41955 4TH ST 13.13 13.13 11813 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700240713022 41997 MARGARITA 14.28 14.28 RD 11814 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700230816695 28077 DIAZ RD 14.36 14.36 11815 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700451136031 41702 MAIN ST 15.13 15.13 11816 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700404123666 41638 15.20 15.20 WINCHESTER RD 11817 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700230666549 28079 DIAZ RD 15.85 15.85 11818 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700390915502 27991 DIAZ RD 16.21 16.21 11819 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700369097471 27407 DIAZ RD 16.72 16.72 11820 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700593904368 46497 WOLF 18.11 18.11 CREEK DR 11821 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700593845259 31523 WOLF 19.44 19.44 VALLEY RD 11822 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700170354373 28402 MERCEDES 25.74 25.74 ST 11823 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700541167387 30027 FRONT ST 36.25 36.25 11824 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700116187149 44465 41.43 41.43 BUTTERFIELD STG 11825 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700271963590 42061 MAIN ST 42.20 42.20 11826 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700169846034 41902 MAIN ST 152.12 152.12 11827 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700047442340 30498 TEMECULA 216.11 216.11 PKWY 11828 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700021560619 28300 MERCEDES 413.72 413.72 ST Page:1 apChkLst 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 11829 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700622434290 29119 MARGARITA 603.61 603.61 RD 11830 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700338442744 43210 BUS PARK 834.79 834.79 DR 11831 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700295805887 41375 MCCABE CT 886.64 886.64 11832 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700618295727 41952 6TH ST 977.93 977.93 11833 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700014812146 41951 MORAGA RD 1,025.68 1,025.68 11834 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700492769845 28373 OLD TOWN 1,279.45 1,279.45 FRONT ST 11835 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700395923227 28314 MERCEDES 1,396.87 1,396.87 ST 11836 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 70016990332541904 MAIN ST 1,685.47 1,685.47 11837 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700562810212 32380 DEER 2,113.17 2,113.17 HOLLOW WAY 11838 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700024603688 41845 6TH ST 2,263.29 2,263.29 11839 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700168560580 28690 MERCEDES 2,446.69 2,446.69 ST 11840 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700138949110 STA 92 3211 WOLF 2,580.43 2,580.43 11841 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700169717813 28690 MERCEDES 3,571.25 3,571.25 ST 11842 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700350108713 43230 BUS PARK 4,047.33 4,047.33 DR 11843 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 70000005066543200 BUS PARK 4,393.93 4,393.93 DR 11844 9/7/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700474429468 41000 MAIN ST 38,878.10 38,878.10 11871 9/9/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700593944784 31738 WOLF 14.47 14.47 VALLEY RD Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 11872 9/9/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11873 9/9/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11874 9/9/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11875 9/9/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11876 9/9/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11877 9/9/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11878 9/9/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11879 9/9/2021 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 11880 9/13/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11881 9/13/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11882 9/13/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11883 9/13/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11884 9/13/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11886 9/9/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 11887 9/9/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 11888 9/10/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 11889 9/10/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total AUG 700402997759 45538 REDWOOD 14.66 14.66 RD AUG 700505220908 45610 PECHANGA 29.11 29.11 PKWY AUG 700171448958 33451 S HWY 79 31.84 31.84 AUG 700404043945 45303 REDWOOD 116.52 116.52 RD AUG 700335018442 45850 N WOLF 420.75 420.75 CREEK AUG 700395478239 30017 RANCHO 1,256.97 1,256.97 CAL RD AUG 700385358210 30600 PAUBA RD 16,371.63 16,371.63 7/16-8/15 16,583.78 16,583.78 CELLULAR/BROADBAN D:CITYW I DE AUG 700390905802 28301 RANCHO 29.26 29.26 CAL RD AUG 700454673905 40750 103.61 103.61 BUTTERFIELD STG AUG 700039456210 46146 WOLF 213.87 213.87 CREEK DR AUG 700213755712 28816 PUJOL ST 1,067.23 1,067.23 AUG 700173434428 42051 MAIN ST 7,508.60 7,508.60 AUG 101-525-1560-6 27415 105.47 105.47 ENTERPRISE CIR SEPT INTERNET SVCS - THEATER 150.98 150.98 AUG 098-255-9828-8 29119 MARGARITA 22.04 22.04 RD AUG 117-188-6393-6 32131 S LOOP RD 100.87 100.87 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 11890 9/14/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700581895061 29028 OLD TOWN FRONT ST 11891 9/14/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700418750458 31777 DE PORTOLA RD 11892 9/14/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700251991189 45602 REDHAWK PKWY 11893 9/14/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700306036256 31454 TEMECULA PKWY 11894 9/14/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700116582930 44205 MAIN ST 11895 9/14/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700572390172 46899 REDHAWK PKWY 11896 9/14/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700037888042 32005 MURRIETA HOT SPR 11897 9/16/2021 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT SUPPORT 11898 9/16/2021 021301 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN 106474 PAYMENT 11899 9/16/2021 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 303355 PAYMENT 11900 9/16/2021 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAX PAYMENT 11901 9/16/2021 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 11902 9/16/2021 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT SOLUTION 11903 9/16/2021 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 11904 9/16/2021 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 206821 9/16/2021 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SEP EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM: LLC, DBAAETNA RESOURCES HR Amount Paid Check Total 13.61 13.61 14.48 14.48 18.10 18.10 117.54 117.54 126.85 126.85 129.40 129.40 148.65 148.65 509.83 509.83 1,134.62 1,134.62 14,899.45 14,899.45 29,494.21 29,494.21 94,193.51 94,193.51 12,150.00 12,150.00 344.39 344.39 2,954.08 2,954.08 1,386.00 1,386.00 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 206822 9/16/2021 010905 ALLIED TRAFFIC & ARROWBOARD LIGHT RETROFIT KITS: EQUIPMENT, RENTALS INC PW 206823 9/16/2021 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Misc Small Tools/Equipment: HR INC REC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: MALL: PD MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD FURNITURE & FIXTURES: OFC CHAIRS: REC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO TECH MISC SMALL TOOLS/EQUIP: EOC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: P\ 206824 9/16/2021 017149 B G P RECREATION INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 206825 9/16/2021 011954 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL - TCSD BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY 206826 9/16/2021 016446 CHRISTIAN STITCHERY INC, BIBS - FIT FUN COLOR RUN: CRC: DBA SO CAL IMPRESSIONS TCSD 206827 9/16/2021 005417 CINTAS PROTECTION NO2, FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT CINTAS FIRE 636525 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 206828 9/16/2021 022596 CITYGATE ASSOCIATES LLC PROF SVC AGREEMENT: PD ASSESSMENT 206829 9/16/2021 022679 CLAASIC LLC MRAP RENTALASSIST. GRANT RECIPIENT 206830 9/16/2021 019814 CODE 5 GROUP LLC ANNUAL TRACKING SLAP ON TRACKERS:PD 206831 9/16/2021 011922 CORELOGIC INC, DBA AUG PROP ID SFTWR: CODE CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS ENFORCEMENT Amount Paid Check Total 4,751.25 4,751.25 163.78 1,154.73 173.98 96.88 407.66 38.23 977.66 1,081.51 354.10 29.94 52.08 64.96 4,595.51 7,730.80 7,730.80 16.53 8.28 519.91 544.72 1,596.80 1,596.80 165.42 146.16 272.11 91.13 248.75 181.66 209.02 514.49 1,828.74 2,882.25 2,882.25 7,500.00 7,500.00 4,362.00 4,362.00 339.50 339.50 Pages apChkLst 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 206832 9/16/2021 014521 COSTAR REALTY SEP'21 WEB SUBSCRIPTION: ECO 1,200.00 1,200.00 INFORMATION INC DEV 206833 9/16/2021 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 MISC KITCHEN SUPPLIES: PLANNING 177.21 Misc supplies: QLMLP meeting 92.97 Misc supplies: QLMLP meeting 144.58 MISC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIRE 143.22 557.98 206834 9/16/2021 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 MISC SUPPLIES: VITICULTURE: TCSD 213.45 213.45 206835 9/16/2021 003053 FAGAN, MATTHEW ART OFF THE WALLS EVENT: MUSIC: 225.00 225.00 TCSD 206836 9/16/2021 019469 FALCON ENGINEERING CNSTRCTN MGMT SVCS: SANTA 40,208.58 40,208.58 SERVICES GERTRUDIS CRK 206837 9/16/2021 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXP MAIL SVCS: FIRE DEPT 26.96 EXP MAIL SVCS: FIRE DEPT 23.73 50.69 206838 9/16/2021 013749 HELIXSTORM INC SURVEILLANCE SWITCHES SUPPORT: 8,940.00 8,940.00 IT 206839 9/16/2021 001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & SALES TAX & RECOVERY SVCS: 1ST 7,824.54 7,824.54 ASSOC QTR 206840 9/16/2021 003198 HOME DEPOT MISC SUPPLIES: VITICULTURE: TCSD 27.07 27.07 206841 9/16/2021 014435 INLAND EROSION CONTROL Misc erosion ctrl supplies: PW Streets 1,650.00 1,650.00 SRVCS 206842 9/16/2021 021896 JP HANDMADE CORP, DBA MISC STAFF BUSINESS CARDS: TCSD 150.75 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS: WATSON, L: PLANNIP 150.75 301.50 206843 9/16/2021 001091 KEYSER MARSTON Rendezvous Apts PA20-1325 Fiscal 370.63 370.63 ASSOCIATES INC Impact 206844 9/16/2021 022622 LIA SHANNON-MARSH BOOTH, MUSIC PERF: 2ND SATURDAY EVENT: 400.00 400.00 DBA LIA BOOTH MUSIC TVM 206845 9/16/2021 015733 LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF, CALIBRATION SVCS: TEM SHERIFF 100.00 100.00 AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER 206846 9/16/2021 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA MISC STREET SIGNAGE: HR 53.82 53.82 ATHACO INC Page.-6 apChkLst 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 206847 9/16/2021 021434 MATRIX TELECOM LLC DBA AUG 800 SERVICES: CIVIC CENTER 69.49 69.49 LINGO 206848 9/16/2021 013443 MIDWEST TAPE LLC BOOKS ON TAPE: LIBRARY 32.61 BOOKS ON TAPE: LIBRARY 43.49 76.10 206849 9/16/2021 021343 MILLER ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: MPSC 26,840.00 26,840.00 CORP RENOVATION 206850 9/16/2021 021283 MT PIT LLC, THE Theater Student Led Theater Production 900.00 900.00 206851 9/16/2021 019019 MUSIC CONNECTION LLC STTLMNT: SPEAKEASY AT THE MERC 674.80 674.80 9/11 206852 9/16/2021 018099 NATIONAL SAFETY DOT Testing: HR 179.90 179.90 COMPLIANCE INC 206853 9/16/2021 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE 26 WKS SUBSCR:PLANNING 180905646 554.90 554.90 COMPANY INC 206854 9/16/2021 019712 RED HELMET TRAINING FIRE INSPECTOR TRNG M. 240.00 240.00 GARAY-EALEY 206855 9/16/2021 017391 RISE INTERPRETING INC AUG SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING: 2,590.00 2,590.00 CLASSES 206856 9/16/2021 008511 RIVERSIDE CO AIRPORT LAND ALUC APPL: GEN.PLN ELEMENT 420.00 420.00 USE, COMMISSION REVIEW 206857 9/16/2021 000411 RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD DEPOSIT FEE: SANTA GERTRUDIS 1,000.00 1,000.00 CONTROL AND, WATER CRK CONSERVATION DIST 206858 9/16/2021 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 7/1-28/21 LAW ENFORCEMENT 2,539,461.81 2,539,461.81 DEPT 206859 9/16/2021 009980 SANBORN GWYNETH A, CO COUNTRY LIVE! @ THE MERC 9/4 935.00 935.00 TEMECULA MUSIC ACADEMY 206860 9/16/2021 022678 SEPHTON, ERICA REFUND: BEAR CUB UNIVERSITY 152.25 152.25 CLASS Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206861 9/16/2021 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 206862 9/16/2021 013551 SUMMERHOUSE HOUSING ASSOC 206863 9/16/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 206864 9/16/2021 020911 T-MOBILE USA, INC. 206865 9/16/2021 018147 WADDLETON, JEFFREY L 206866 9/16/2021 007987 WALMART 206867 9/16/2021 000339 WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, DBA:THOMSON REUTERS 206868 9/16/2021 021148 WEX BANK (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total AUG PEST CONTROL: VAR. PARKS 493.00 SEPT PEST CONTROL: STA 73 68.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: WEST WING 40.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: STA 95 80.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: PALOMA DEL SOL 94.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: PBSP 70.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: WOLF CREEK PAF 49.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: THEATER 90.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: PW PARKS 95.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: K. HINTERGARDT 188.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: HARVESTON PAR 188.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: DUCK POND 49.00 1,504.00 MRAP RENTALASSIST. GRANT 2,244.00 2,244.00 RECIPIENT SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 30755 754.71 AULD RD SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 41000 MA 3,457.97 SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 41973 6TF 754.71 SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 32211 WC 194.34 AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 28300 MERCE 598.64 SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 29119 MAI 324.96 AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 29119 MARGA 1,655.67 AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 32364 OVERL, 119.99 AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 40820 WINCHI 598.64 SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 40820 5.32 AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 32380 DEER F 598.64 9,063.59 GPS LOCATE SVCS-6/23-7/23/21 930.00 930.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 273.00 273.00 THEATER HOSPITALITY & MISC 269.79 SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES: MERC GALLERY RECEI 11.43 281.22 AUG CLEAR SUBSCRIPTION: TEM 984.53 984.53 SHERIFF 8/6-9/6 FUEL USAGE: POLICE 1,790.70 1,790.70 Grand total for UNION BANK: 2,961,267.13 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 09/16/2021 2:15:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA 114 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 2,961,267.13 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 09/21/2021 8:42:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206820 9/9/2021 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVATION Description Amount Paid Check Total 2ND QTR SMI 2021: BLDG & SAFETY 4,942.98 Grand total for UNION BANK: 4,942.98 4,942.98 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 09/21/2021 8:42:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 501078 9/23/2021 016450 AIR EXCHANGE INC GYM/GARAGE: FIRE STA 73: PW19-13 501079 9/23/2021 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEM AFN SHERIFF DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEM SHERIF 501080 9/23/2021 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO SEP DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: INFO TECH 501081 9/23/2021 011666 B P S TACTICAL INC TACTICAL BALLISTIC VEST COVERS: PD 501082 9/23/2021 021349 CASA CENTER AGAINST SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SEXUAL, ASSAULT OF SW RIV CO SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF sexual assault exams: tern sheriff— SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF 501083 9/23/2021 004412 COMPLETE TENNIS CAMP, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS CTC TENNIS AKA KERRY LE 501084 9/23/2021 021291 COOKE AARON, DBA PROPER SIGNAGE FOR COLOR RUN: CRC: MANAGEMENT TCSD 501085 9/23/2021 004382 DEKRA LITE INC DEP: OT LIGHTING/DECOR: SPEC EVENTS 501086 9/23/2021 022506 DESIGN PATH STUDIO Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit 501087 9/23/2021 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT: PW FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC DIV FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG & SAFI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: F FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEP' Amount Paid Check Total 22,795.28 22,795.28 935.90 32.90 968.80 28.28 28.28 569.46 569.46 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 800.00 800.00 800.00 800.00 800.00 11,200.00 1,078.00 1,078.00 78.83 78.83 5,051.80 5,051.80 10,743.75 10,743.75 1,463.26 896.47 373.91 307.77 218.86 187.08 113.35 97.79 51.68 3,710.17 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 09/21/2021 8:42:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 501088 9/23/2021 002577 ENGINEERING RESOURCES, ENG CONSULT SVCS: OVERLAND: OF SOUTHERN CALIF., INC. PW20-11 501089 9/23/2021 010804 FEHR AND PEERS Transportation Discovery/ Benchmarking 501090 9/23/2021 021814 GIROUARD ERICK JOSEPH, NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION: MPSC: DBA E&G DISTRIBUTION LLC TCSD 501091 9/23/2021 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNING MISC OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY MISC OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY MISC OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNING 501092 9/23/2021 004890 GOLDEN STATE FIRE FIRE SPRINKLER MAINT: FIRE STA 73 PROTECTION 501093 9/23/2021 020673 INTEGRITY SUPPORT PRE -EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS - HR SERVICES INC, EMPLOYMENT SCREENING RESO 501094 9/23/2021 022018 KNOWBE4 INC STAFF TRAINING: INFO TECH 501095 9/23/2021 021370 MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY JUL DSGN CONSULTANT SVCS: INC CHERRY ST EXT 501096 9/23/2021 022598 MCE CORPORATION AUG LDSCP MAINT: SCHOOLS/SPORTS PARKS 501097 9/23/2021 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC AUG CDBG-CV EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSIST PGM AUG CDBG-CV EMERGENCY RENTAL AS 501098 9/23/2021 020946 MUSSON THEATRICAL INC SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES: THEATER 501099 9/23/2021 021832 QLESS INC EQUIPMENT FOR QLESS: INFO TECH 501100 9/23/2021 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 9/9/21 501101 9/23/2021 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO PERMIT B18-2118 PAYMENT REG, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Amount Paid Check Total 6,218.07 14,424.38 125.00 203.54 81.72 72.60 60.51 41.84 5.08 744.00 381.74 7,762.50 24,550.36 57,154.76 2,446.00 1,121.00 278.09 3,480.00 550.00 20.23 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 6,218.07 14,424.38 125.00 465.29 744.00 381.74 7,762.50 24,550.36 57,154.76 3,567.00 278.09 3,480.00 550.00 20.23 175,945.79 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 09/21/2021 8:42:43AM CITY OF TEMECULA 25 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 180,888.77 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 09/21/2021 2:43:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 501102 9/23/2021 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO 501103 9/23/2021 021400 AYERS ELECTRIC INC 501104 9/23/2021 020592 BANNER BANK Description SEP DRINKING WTR MAINT: CIVIC CTR AUG DRINKING WTR MAINT: CIVIC CTR SEP DRINKING WTR MAINT: AQUATICS SEP DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: AULD R SEP DRINKING WTR MAINT: MPSC SEP DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: THEATE SEP DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: JRC SEP DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TVM SEP DRINKING WTR MAINT: TCC SEP DRINKING WTR MAINT: TPL SEP DRINKING WTR MAINT: PW SEP DRINKING WTR MAINT: FOC LED Lighting Install: Paloma del Sol Pk ELECTRICAL WORK: LIGHTING STORAG ELECTRIC BUS CHARGER INSTALLATIOI ELECTRICAL WORK: LED LIGHTING REP ELECTRICAL WORK: REPLACE BATHRO, ELECTRICAL WORK: REPAIR LIGHTING: RET.TO ESCROW1838:RJNOBLE/PVMNT REHAB 501105 9/23/2021 021588 BRAUN PETER, DBA SEP PLANTSCAPE SVCS: CIVIC CTR TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE SEP PLANTSCAPE SVCS: TPL 501106 9/23/2021 020904 ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES INC SEP CONDENSER WTR SYS PM: CIVIC CTR 501107 9/23/2021 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC TEACHING SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE DEPT TEACHING SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE DEP 501108 9/23/2021 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC AUG CDBG - LABOR COMPLIANCE PW20-08 501109 9/23/2021 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING ON -CALL WELDING: PW PARKS INC ON -CALL WELDING: PW PARKS ON -CALL WELDING: PW PARKS 501110 9/23/2021 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 95 INC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 95 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 73 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 95 Amount Paid Check Total 212.00 183.71 67.34 56.57 34.75 28.28 28.28 28.28 28.28 28.28 28.28 28.28 2,700.00 1,500.00 900.00 400.00 200.00 100.00 4,399.13 500.00 200.00 538.67 3,394.79 30.56 847.13 950.00 380.00 75.00 73.92 69.19 50.18 24.36 752.33 5,800.00 4,399.13 700.00 538.67 3,425.35 847.13 1,405.00 217.65 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 09/21/2021 2:43:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 501111 9/23/2021 022599 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC IRRIGATION REPAIRS: HARVESTON LAKE PARK IRRIGATION REPAIRS: HARVESTON SLO IRRIGATION REPAIRS: HARVESTON SILO IRRIGATION REPAIRS: TEMEKU HILLS IRRIGATION REPAIRS: NAKAYAMA PARK IRRIGATION REPAIRS: HARVESTON LAK 501112 9/23/2021 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: POLICE INC CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: POLICE 501113 9/23/2021 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW CIP INC CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW PARKS CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW PARKS CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW PARKS CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW STREEI CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW FACS CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW PARKS CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW PARKS 501114 9/23/2021 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: CODE INC ENF 501115 9/23/2021 002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS INC MOTOR HELMETS: POLICE TRAFFIC 501116 9/23/2021 022553 PAL GENERAL ENGINEERING 8/2-9/1 PARK & RIDE ACCESS IMPRVS, INC 18-11 501117 9/23/2021 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY AUG PRGS 4: PAVEMENT REHAB, PW18-01 501118 9/23/2021 002412 RICHARDS WATSON AND AUGUST 2021 LEGAL SERVICES GERSHON 501119 9/23/2021 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CRC/AQUATICS LOCKSMITH SRVC LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CIVIC CENTER LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CIVIC CENTER 501120 9/23/2021 006145 STENO SOLUTIONS AUG TRANSCRIPTION SVCS: TEM TRANSCRIPTION, SRVCS INC SHERIFF 501121 9/23/2021 003840 STRONG'S PAINTING PAINT SHELTER: DUCK POND Amount Paid Check Total 470.60 422.93 337.75 116.29 63.45 63.45 729.31 460.34 398.96 238.63 204.42 171.26 73.29 49.99 46.94 39.87 39.87 840.84 26,133.36 83,583.50 499.00 313.12 53.83 41.87 84.51 3,800.00 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 1,474.47 1,189.65 1,223.36 39.87 840.84 26,133.36 83,583.50 499.00 408.82 84.51 3,800.00 137,362.64 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 09/21/2021 2:43:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA 20 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 137,362.64 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 11845 9/17/2021 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER VARIOUS AUG WATER 3015553 DEER DISTRICT HOLLOW WY 11860 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 017443 OPERATING CO.LLC RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL MTG: MED.CUISINE, DBA: DAPHNE'S 07/27 CALIFORNIA 005531 FRONT STREET BAR & GRILL RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL MTG 7/13 DBA, BAILY WINE COUNTRY CAFE 008956 PANERA BREAD RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL SPECIAL MTG 7/20 008956 PANERA BREAD RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL SPECIAL MTG 7/20 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE RO ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION: CITY COMPANY INC CLERK 009612 BJS RESTAURANTS INC RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL MTG: 08/10 019472 NNA SERVICES LLC RO MEMB.FEES & SUPPLIES: RAMIREZ 021453 SACRAMENTO BEE RO SUBSCRIPTION: ONLINE DIGITAL SUBSCRIP 11861 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 021003 CVS PHARMACY MW HOMESLESS OUTREACH 020489 GREYHOUND LINES MW TRANSP: HOMELESS OUTREACH 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC MW RFRSHMNTS: TEAM MTG 8/6/21 002861 PETSMART MW HOMELESS OUTREACH 002861 PETSMART MW SUPPLIES: HELP CTR 022560 UBER MW TRANSP: HOMELESS OUTREACH 022560 UBER MW TRANSP: HOMELESS OUTREACH 022560 UBER MW TRANSP: HOMELESS OUTREACH 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC MW RFRSHMNTS: TEAM MTG 07/26 022560 UBER MW TRANSP: HOMELESS OUTREACH 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD MW HOMESLESS OUTREACH SRVCS 010307 CHICK FILA INC MW RFRSHMNTS: HIGH HOPES EVENT Amount Paid Check Total 69,256.33 69,256.33 241.85 248.38 297.30 96.15 14.00 320.92 855.00 12.99 2,086.59 25.00 163.99 46.52 15.21 51.53 60.06 80.98 72.05 124.97 66.99 100.00 636.19 1,443.49 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 11862 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 019967 MISAC 004171 DOMINO'S PIZZA 019967 MISAC 008567 GODADDY.COM INC. 11863 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 022498 TEMECULAT-SHIRT PRINTER 020886 NETFLIX.COM 022594 CONCORD THEATRICALS CORP 022594 CONCORD THEATRICALS CORP 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY INC 002702 USPS - POC, ACCOUNT#8089685 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING, CENTERSINC 006364 BARNES AND NOBLE STORE 006952 PAYPAL 000152 CALIF PARKS AND RECREATION SOC, C P R S 007987 WALMART 007987 WALMART 012085 ISTOCK INT'L INC. 022680 FEVER USA 11864 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 015626 EVENTBRITE.COM 015626 EVENTBRITE.COM 015626 EVENTBRITE.COM (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MH MEMB RENEWAL: 390.00 HESLIN/PATRICK/CROWELL MH RFRSHMNTS: TEAM PACE 95.12 MH AWARD SUBMISSION: INFO TECH 100.00 MH DOMAIN RENEWAL: 95.85 680.97 GROWTEMECULAVALLEY KH PRINTING SVCS: COVID MEMORIAL 26.10 FLAGS KH MONTHLY CHARGE FOR SVC: CRC 8.99 TEEN ROOM KH PERFORMANCE RIGHTS: THEATER 2,549.96 KH SCRIPTS: WIZARD OF OZ: 352.59 THEATER KH MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION: TCSD 18.00 KH CONF REGISTRATION: 100.00 FLETCHER/DAMKO KH WELLNESS CHALLENGE: HR 50.00 KH OVER THE CREDIT LIMIT FEE: TCSD 39.00 KH SUBSCRIPTION: BETTER IMPACT: 504.00 TCSD KH MEMBERSHIP FEES: RAYA, S. 425.00 KH HOSPITALITY & MISC SUPPLIES: 286.86 THEATER KH HOSPITALITY & MISC SUPPLIES: 261.79 THEATER KH SUBSCRIPTION: PROMO IMAGES: 120.00 TCSD KH ADMISSION: EXHIBIT: 82.00 4,869.59 F R I C K/BARN ETT ZH REGIST: CRITICAL INCIDENT: 125.00 STALLARD ZH REGIST: CRITICAL INCIDENT: 125.00 ROBERTS ZH REGIST: CRITICAL INCIDENT: 125.00 375.00 GARCIA Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 11865 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 015534 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC, DBA NEOGOV 022676 TRAINHRLEARNING 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 021482 GIFTCARDS.COM 018323 GOAT & VINE, THE 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 000154 C S M F O 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 018979 ICMA 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS, ASSOCIATION, GFOA 006952 PAYPAL 015534 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC, DBA NEOGOV 11867 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 007651 FILIPPIS PIZZA GROTTO 018389 IN-N-OUT BURGER INC 008669 VONS 022674 THE WEST HOLLYWOOD EDITION 009194 VILLAGE NEWS, INC 010514 CAMPINI'S ITALIAN DELI 008956 PANERA BREAD 010514 CAMPINI'S ITALIAN DELI (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total IG RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING: HR 119.00 IG WEBINAR REGISTRATION: OBMANN 145.00 IG SUPPLIES: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS 113.01 IG SUPPLIES: EMPOLOYEE 584.85 WELLNESS IG EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: EOQ: 218.82 HR IG RFRSHMNTS: TEAM PACE 106.03 IG EMPLOYEE WELLNESS SUPPLIES: 65.25 HR IG RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING: HR 400.00 IG CREDIT: ITEM NOT DELIVERED: HR -44.94 IG RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING: HR 225.00 IG RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING: HR 150.00 IG RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING: HR 300.00 IG RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING: HR 130.00 2,512.02 AA RFRSHMNT: ATTORNEY MTG: 79.55 STAFF REIMBUR AA RFRSHMNTS: BOARD MTG: CCMF 11.44 AA RFRSHMNTS: CITY COUNCIL MTGS 50.55 AA LODGING: BOARD MTG: CCMF: 404.73 ADAMS AASBSCRPTN: ONLINE & PRINT: CITY 69.95 MGR AA RFRSHMNT: ATTORNEY MTG: 95.77 STAFF REIMB'D AA RFRSHMNTS: STRATEGIC 453.78 PLANNING 7/20 AA RFRSHMNTS: STRATEGIC 19.48 1,185.25 PLANNING 7/20 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 11868 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 021342 RING.COM JC SUBSCRIPTION: OVERLAND TRAIL: FIRE 018323 GOAT & VINE, THE JC RFRSHMNTS: COVID MTG: PREVENTION 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING, JC MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: WIGLE, E. CENTERSINC 003198 HOME DEPOT JC DRYER PUCHASE: FIRE STA 95 013338 APPLE STORE JC ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: MILLER, W. 021845 WETOKOLE.COM JC SEAT COVERS: FIRE DEPT 003198 HOME DEPOT JC DRYER PURCHASE: FIRE STA 73 022607 CMC RESCUE JC BAGS FOR EQUIPMENT: FIRE DEPT 003198 HOME DEPOT JC DRYER PUCHASE: FIRE STA 95 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 JC BEREAVEMENT FLOWERS: GUTIERREZ 11869 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING, ME CONF REGISTRATION: EDWARDS, CENTERSINC M. 11870 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020236 CLIPPERCREEK, INC. PT BUS CHARGER: FOC 022672 CALIF BOARD FOR PT RENEWAL: CIVIL ENG LICENSE: PROFESSIONAL, ENGINEERS, THOMAS LAND SURVEYORS 022673 LOCAL TECHNICAL ASSIST PT REGIST: WEBINAR: SHARP, A. PRGM 11885 9/10/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING, JS CONF REGISTRATION: STEWART, J. CENTERSINC JS CREDIT ON ACCOUNT: CITY MGR 11906 9/15/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700619554097 30051 RANCHO CAL RD 11907 9/15/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700503663349 28916 PUJOL ST 11908 9/15/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700503770150 28922 PUJOL ST 11909 9/15/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700025717269 30875 RANCHO VISTA RD Amount Paid Check Total 100.00 220.09 265.00 -109.13 0.99 359.62 920.41 147.62 1,037.86 47.47 2,989.93 50.00 50.00 1,178.15 180.00 25.00 1,383.15 50.00 -0.36 49.64 14.66 14.66 47.29 47.29 185.76 185.76 9,668.32 9,668.32 Page:4 apChkLst 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 11910 9/15/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 600001509166 27220 JEFFERSON 19,094.63 19,094.63 AVE 11911 9/16/2021 022556 HANSON AGGREGTE PACIFIC CNSTRCTN CONTRACT SVCS: 1,976,982.59 1,976,982.59 SW LLC, DBAATP GENERAL PAVEMNT REHAB ENG CONTR 11912 9/15/2021 020062 MEDLINE INDUSTRIES INC QE JUN 2021 SALES TAX PHS 318,651.00 318,651.00 11913 9/16/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC SEPT INTERNET SVCS - EOC 157.69 157.69 11914 9/17/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC SEPT INTERNET SVCS - LIBRARY 5.31 5.31 11915 9/17/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC SEPT INTERNET SERVICES - LIBRARY 5.31 5.31 11916 9/20/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700618534991 30395 MURRIETA 31.87 31.87 HOT SPR 11917 9/20/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700367835663 28582 HARVESTON 880.50 880.50 DR 11918 9/20/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 600001004059 41320 5,050.35 5,050.35 BUTTERFIELD STG 11919 9/20/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER AUGUST WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH 49.20 49.20 DIST LOOP RD 11920 9/20/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER AUGUST WATER SVCS 31991 97.60 97.60 DIST RORIPAUGH 11921 9/20/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER AUGUST WATER SVCS 39656 DIEGO 131.39 131.39 DIST DR 11922 9/20/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER AUGUST WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH 193.60 193.60 DIST LOOP RD 11923 9/20/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER AUGUST WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH 2O5.56 205.56 DIST LOOP RD 11924 9/20/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER AUGUST WATER SVCS 31991 1,986.23 1,986.23 DIST RORIPAUGH 11926 9/21/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700145715868 30499 RANCHO 103.21 103.21 CAL RD Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 11927 9/21/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700030933344 26706 YNEZ RD 11928 9/21/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700246573943 26953 YNEZ RD 11929 9/21/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG 700036969370 40820 WINCHESTER RD 11930 9/21/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY AUG 091-085-1632-0 41951 MORAGA RD 102096 9/20/2021 022611 PRO INSTALLATION CO REFUND: CANCELLED PERMIT B21-4587 206869 9/23/2021 010904 AFECO INC DBA FIRE ETC SMALL TOOLS: FIRE DEPT. 206870 9/23/2021 003552 AFLAC PREMIUM HOLDING, AFLAC ACCIDENT INDEMNITY C/O BNB BANK LOCKBOX PAYMENT 206871 9/23/2021 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES MISC EQUIP: BC/CHIEF: FIRE DEPT INC MISC EQUIP: PREVENTION: FIRE DEPT MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TVM: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIR 206872 9/23/2021 011954 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY 206873 9/23/2021 010469 BOZONELOS, BOB MUSIC PERFORMANCE: TVM: TCSD 206874 9/23/2021 022681 BSREP II WS HOTEL REFUND: PA20-0072 APPLICATION EXPANSION, HOLDING LLC WITHDRAWN 206875 9/23/2021 021851 CALIF NEWSPAPERS AUG PUBLIC NTC ADS: CITY CLERK PARTNERSHIP, DBA SO CALIF NEWS GROUP 206876 9/23/2021 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO GOVERNMENT LLC TECH 206877 9/23/2021 010307 CHICK FILA INC RFRSHMNTS: HEALTH FAIR 206878 9/23/2021 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING: HR 206879 9/23/2021 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA AUG FSA& COBRAADMIN: HR THE ADVANTAGE GROUP Amount Paid Check Total 126.48 126.48 175.57 175.57 1,111.30 1,111.30 242.95 242.95 143.10 143.10 811.48 811.48 3,790.56 3,790.56 98.91 753.27 241.92 13.04 1,107.14 373.45 19.55 39.65 432.65 250.00 250.00 2,366.85 2,366.85 1,608.80 1,608.80 267.26 267.26 699.81 699.81 200.00 200.00 601.20 601.20 Page.-6 apChkLst 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 206880 9/23/2021 021683 COMMERCIAL Class A Driver License: Training Class 6,233.82 TRANSPORTATION, SERVICES INC VEHICLE INSPECTION FORMS: PUBLIC 1 176.18 6,410.00 206881 9/23/2021 010865 CONSTANT CONTACT INC SFTWR RENEWAL: INFO TECH 3,576.00 3,576.00 206882 9/23/2021 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 AGENCY MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 180.00 180.00 206883 9/23/2021 012600 DAVID EVANS AND AUG CONST BID SUPPOT: SANTA 1,210.00 ASSOCIATES INC GERTRUDIS CR AUG DSGN SVCS: RRSP EXPANSION 18- 170.00 SURVEY & ENVIRO: TRAFFIC SIGNAL PA 8,812.06 AUG DSGN SVCS: DIAZ RD PROJ PW17-: 7,041.15 AUG DSGN SVCS: DLR SIDEWALKS. PW 10,420.68 DSGN SVCS: RECYCLED WATER PROJE 4,849.00 32,502.89 206884 9/23/2021 002990 DAVID TURCH AND AUG FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY 5,500.00 5,500.00 ASSOCIATES MGR 206885 9/23/2021 022483 DE LA SECURA INC, DBA DLS DSGN-BUILD SVCS: MRC PW17-21 278,408.66 278,408.66 BUILDERS 206886 9/23/2021 003633 FOOTHILL EASTERN TOLL ROADS USAGE: POLICE 8.65 8.65 TRANSPORTN., CORRIDOR AGNCY (TOLL RIDS) 206887 9/23/2021 021527 GIANT DESIGN DEP: GRAPHIC DSGN, GOODS & 10,471.90 10,471.90 SVCS: TCSD 206888 9/23/2021 003198 HOME DEPOT MISC HRDWR SUPPLIES: THEATER 175.16 175.16 206889 9/23/2021 013286 INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC SEPT ENTERPRISE 911 SVC: IT 300.00 300.00 206890 9/23/2021 018352 JAMES ELLIOTT TEMECULA PRESENTS: LED ZEPAGAIN 3,500.00 3,500.00 ENTERTAINMENT 206891 9/23/2021 018352 JAMES ELLIOTT TEMECULA PRESENTS: LONG RUN 3,500.00 3,500.00 ENTERTAINMENT 206892 9/23/2021 018352 JAMES ELLIOTT TEMECULA PRESENTS: TINA TURNER 3,300.00 3,300.00 ENTERTAINMENT 206893 9/23/2021 022682 KELLY, VIVIAN G RELEASE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT: RISK 16,500.00 16,500.00 DEPT Page:? apChkLst 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 206894 9/23/2021 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDYAND AUG HR LEGAL SVCS FOR 1,545.00 WHITMORE TE060-00001 FEB HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 1,415.00 DEC HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 5,173.20 8,133.20 206895 9/23/2021 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA CITY STREET SIGNAGE: STREET 810.32 810.32 ATHACO INC MAINT: PW 206896 9/23/2021 016297 MID-AMERICAARTS ALLIANCE EXHIBIT RENTAL FEE: THRIFT STYLE: 1,050.00 1,050.00 TCSD 206897 9/23/2021 021343 MILLER ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SVCS: 880.00 CORP MERC: CIP ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SVCS: MERC: 5,200.00 6,080.00 206898 9/23/2021 001323 NESTLE WATERS NORTH 08/11-09/10 WTR DLVRY SVC: FOC 180.34 180.34 AMERICA, DBA READYREFRESH 206899 9/23/2021 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS OCT-DEC'21 ASSN DUES 3561 #19: FV 729.62 PARK OCT-DEC'21 ASSN DUES 3561 #17: FV 557.91 OCT-DEC'21 ASSN DUES 3561 #16: FV 600.67 OCT-DEC'21 ASSN DUES 3561 #20: FV 758.46 2,646.66 206900 9/23/2021 020472 PARKING LOGIX INC PRKG MGMT SYS PARTS: PRKG 300.00 300.00 STRUCTURE 206901 9/23/2021 015931 PAST PERFECT SOFTWARE ANN'L SOFTWARE SUPPORT 540.00 540.00 INC RENEWAL:TCSD 206902 9/23/2021 003663 PECHANGA BAND OF AUG PROF SRVCS: S.GERTRUDIS 923.52 LUISENO, MISSION INDIANS CRK, PW08-04 AUG PROF SRVCS: PARK & RIDE, PW18- 1,215.68 2,139.20 206903 9/23/2021 010338 POOL AND ELECTRICAL, VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 77.14 77.14 PRODUCTS INC 206904 9/23/2021 008447 PRO AUTO COLLISION INC VEHICLE REPAIRS: FIRE 1,049.23 1,049.23 206905 9/23/2021 019170 PROFESSIONAL WOMEN 10/1/21-9/30/22 MEMBERSHIP DUES 108.00 108.00 TOASTMASTER Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206906 9/23/2021 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 206907 9/23/2021 014365 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC 206908 9/23/2021 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PKASSOC 206909 9/23/2021 011853 RANCON COMMERCE CNTR PH2,3&4 206910 9/23/2021 022537 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES, DISTRIBUTOR 206911 9/23/2021 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK AND RECORDER (Continued) Description 8/12 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: MPSC 7/29 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: MP 7/27 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FO 7/13 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FO 7/20 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FO 7/22 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: MP 8/17 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FO 7/8 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: MPS 7/1 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIVP 7/6 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC 8/12 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIS 8/5 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: MPS 7/8 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIVP 7/15 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIS 8/5 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIVP 7/22 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIS 8/3 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC 8/10 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FO 7/29 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIS 9/14/21-9/13/22 LEASE: INFO TECH OCT-DEC'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: TVE2 OCT-DEC'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: DIAZ R OCT-DEC'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: FOC OCT-DEC'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: OVRLND PRJT OCT-DEC'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: OVRLN OCT-DEC'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: OVRLN HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVC CENTER HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVC CENTER HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVC CENTER HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVC CENTER HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVC CENTER HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE NOE CRC SPLASH PAD & SHADE, PW21-07 Amount Paid Check Total 23.15 23.15 9.70 1.89 9.70 23.15 9.70 23.15 95.70 9.70 95.70 23.15 95.70 95.70 95.70 95.70 9.70 9.70 95.70 4,870.86 2,234.14 2,033.07 1,843.17 198.38 177.27 249.03 16.20 28.11 281.67 119.50 42.54 28.10 250.67 42.54 114.91 92.79 129.82 457.09 50.00 845.74 4,870.86 6,110.38 624.68 1,603.94 50.00 Page9 apChkLst 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 206912 9/23/2021 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE FPARC-TM, 233975, 20/21, Q4 921,639.84 921,639.84 DEPARTMENT 206913 9/23/2021 000411 RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD 7/21 CHANGES: S.GERTRUDIS CRK 1,497.31 CONTROLAND, WATER CONSERVATION DIST 7/21 CHANGES: MURR CRK CHNL 128.18 ADD'L DEPOSIT:MURR CRK ENCROACH 1,000.00 2,625.49 206914 9/23/2021 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC TRAFFIC ROAD PAINT: PW STREET 4,184.10 4,184.10 MAINT 206915 9/23/2021 009980 SANBORN GWYNETH A, CO COUNTRY LIVE! @ THE MERC 9/18 708.75 708.75 TEMECULA MUSIC ACADEMY 206916 9/23/2021 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: TVM/MURAL 170.00 PRESTON 9/14 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: WELCOME HOMI 170.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: DUCK POND 9/11 170.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: NAT'L PREPARE[ 220.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: CMO 8/10 90.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: EE LUNCHEON 9 170.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: MPSC 9/16 170.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: TVM 9/11 170.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: MERC/FIRST FRI 170.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: COLOR RUN 9/1f 220.00 1,720.00 206917 9/23/2021 012839 SCHOOL OUTFITTERS LLC WHITE BOARD TABLES: EMERGENCY 3,686.72 3,686.72 MGMT 206918 9/23/2021 020545 SOCIAL WORK ACTION GROUP AUG HMLESS/STR OUTREACH 19,067.50 SVCS:TCSD HOMELESS/STREET OUTREACH SVCS:I 4,000.00 23,067.50 206919 9/23/2021 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST PEST CONTROL: CIVIC CENTER 120.00 CONTROL INC AUG PEST CONTROL: AQUATICS 59.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: WED CHPL 32.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: CRC 90.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: SPLASH PAD 49.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: HISTORY MUSEUI 42.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: SENIOR CENTER 29.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: TCC 123.00 AUG PEST CONTROL: LIBRARY 90.00 634.00 206920 9/23/2021 019250 ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC LLC AUG ON -CALL TRAF SGNL MAINT: PW 1,036.10 1,036.10 TRAFFIC Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206921 9/23/2021 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT (Continued) Description OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES: POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES: POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES: THEATER OFFICE SUPPLIES: THEATER OFFICE SUPPLIES: THEATER OFFICE SUPPLIES: POLICE OTSF MISC SUPPLIES: LIBRARY MISC SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 206922 9/23/2021 014665 STAR WAY SYSTEMS SOUND SYSTEM REPAIR: OLD TOWN CORPORATION 206923 9/23/2021 020985 TEAMWORK PROMOTIONAL, CRIME PREV SUPPLIES: TEM SHERIFF ADVERTISING INC CRIME PREV SUPPLIES: TEM SHERIFF 206924 9/23/2021 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER Q4 2021 TVCC SPONSORSHIP FUNDS OF, COMMERCE 206925 9/23/2021 005970 TEMECULA VALLEY THEATER PERFORMANCE SEPT 23, PLAYHOUSE, DBATEMECULA 2021 VLY PLAYERS MAMMA MIA! TICKET SALES 9/3-19/21 206926 9/23/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 41000 MAIN ST SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 32131 S L SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 28816 PU. SEPTEMBER INTERNET SVCS 41000 MA 206927 9/23/2021 022532 UPTOWN JAZZ ORCHESTRA THEATER PERFORMANCE: OCT 3, 2021 206928 9/23/2021 020963 UPTOWN TEMECULAAUTO JUL VEHICLE DETAILING SRVCS: FIRE SPA LLC 206929 9/23/2021 009101 VISION ONE INC, DBA AUG SHOWARE TICKETING SRVCS: ACCESSO THEATER 206930 9/23/2021 007987 WALMART THEATER HOSPITALITY & MISC SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES: TVM/SECOND SATURD, REC SUPPLIES: CRC -TCSD THEATER HOSPITALITY & MISC SUPPLIE MISC SUPPLIES: TVM/STUDENT MURAL REC SUPPLIES: CRC -TCSD 206931 9/23/2021 020670 WEBB MUNICIPAL FINANCE POST PROPOSITION 218 BALLOT LLC PROCEEDINGS Amount Paid Check Total 168.58 80.39 48.42 463.78 38.48 27.47 14.59 258.74 15.36 80.55 3,818.65 321.45 1,518.75 50,000.00 1,000.00 57,988.06 280.91 250.66 598.64 1,106.70 9,300.00 68.00 2,169.00 28.14 106.19 28.14 248.49 42.76 516.68 781.32 1,196.36 3,818.65 1,840.20 50,000.00 58,988.06 2,236.91 9,300.00 68.00 2,169.00 970.40 781.32 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206932 9/23/2021 020193 WHITE CAP LP 206933 9/23/2021 022684 WILLIAMSON, KATHRYN L 206934 9/23/2021 018687 WOJNIAK, MIKE (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 3,961.81 MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 1,087.50 MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 489.38 5,538.69 PAYMENT OF WAGES AFTER 403.09 403.09 EMPLOYEE DEATH ENTERTAINMENT:AOTW 10/1/21 300.00 300.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 3,932,825.31 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 09/23/2021 3:18:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA 103 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 3,932,825.31 Page:13 Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: October 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance 2021-04 Amending Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.04.030 to Prohibit Conduct at City Council and Other Public Meetings that Actually Disrupts, Disturbs or Otherwise Impedes the Orderly Conduct of Meetings (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2021-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT CONDUCT AT CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS THAT ACTUALLY DISRUPTS, DISTURBS OR OTHERWISE IMPEDES THE ORDERLY CONDUCT OF MEETINGS BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present. Ordinance No. 2021-04 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of September 28, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO.2021-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT CONDUCT AT CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER PUBLIC MEETINGS THAT ACTUALLY DISRUPTS, DISTURBS OR OTHERWISE IMPEDES THE ORDERLY CONDUCT OF MEETINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2.04.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.04.030 Conduct Prohibited at City Council Meetings that Disrupts, Disturbs or Otherwise Impedes the Orderly Conduct of City Council Meetings A. The Council expects persons speaking at City Council meetings to do so in a civil manner that promotes the free exchange of ideas and encourages public participation. Any person who engages in behavior that actually disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of any City Council meeting shall, upon an order by the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a majority of the City Council, be barred from further audience before the City Council during that meeting. B. Examples of disruptive behavior. Examples of behavior that can actually disrupt, disturb, or otherwise impede the orderly conduct of a City Council meeting include, but are not limited to, the following: of that item. 1) Speaking without being recognized by the Mayor or the presiding officer. 2) Continuing to speak after the allotted time has expired. 3) Speaking on an item at a time not designated for discussion by the public 4) Throwing objects. 5) Speaking on an issue that is not within the jurisdiction of the City Council. 6) Speaking to the audience rather than to the City Council. 7) Interrupting a person who is speaking to the City Council during such person's allotted time. 8) Preventing a person from speaking to the City Council during such time as is allocated for comments from the public. 9) Wearing of a mask, costume, disguise or other regalia or paraphernalia that actually disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the City Council meeting. 10) Uttering loud, threatening, or abusive language that actually disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the City Council meeting. 11) Clapping, whistling, stomping feet, and sign waving that actually disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the City Council meeting. C. Enforcement. The rules of conduct for City Council meetings set forth in this section shall be enforced in the following manner: 1) Warning to desist. Whenever practicable, the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a majority of the City Council shall give a warning to a person whose behavior is actually disrupting, disturbing or otherwise impeding the orderly conduct of a City Council meeting. The warning shall identify the disruptive behavior and the manner in which the person must comply. A warning shall not be necessary when it would not be effective due to extraordinary circumstances. Examples of extraordinary circumstances in which no warning is required include situations in which a warning would be difficult to hear over the noise of the disturbance; situations involving an immediate threat to public safety such as the throwing of objects or the display of a weapon; and situations involving a person who has been warned about the same type of disruptive behavior at a City Council meeting held within the prior thirty (30) calendar days. 2) Recess. If, after receiving a request from the Mayor, the person persists in violating the rules, the Mayor may order a recess. Any representative of law enforcement who is present at the meeting when the violation occurs shall be authorized to warn the person that his or her conduct is violating the rules and that he or she is requested to cease such conduct and could be removed from the meeting or prosecuted. 3) Order barring person from meeting. The Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a majority of the City Council may issue an order barring a person from the remainder of a City Council meeting if such person was warned at that City Council meeting about disruptive behavior and such person again engages in behavior that actually disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. Additionally, the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a majority of the City Council may issue an order barring a person from the remainder of a City Council meeting without a warning if there are extraordinary circumstances and the person engages in behavior that actually disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. 4) Removal. If a person barred from the remainder of a City Council meeting does not voluntarily exit the Council chambers, the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a City Council majority may direct the Sergeant -at -arms to remove that person from the Council chambers and exclude that person for the remainder of that meeting. 5) Clearing the Room. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.9, in the event that any meeting is willfully interrupted by a person or groups of persons so as to disrupt, disturb or otherwise impede the orderly conduct of such meeting and order cannot be restored by the removal of the individuals who are willfully interrupting the meeting, City Council may order that the meeting room may be ordered cleared and the meeting shall continue in session. The motion to clear the room shall be by a vote not less than three members of the City Council in favor. Only matters appearing on the agenda may be considered in such a session. Representatives of the press or other news media, except those participating in the disturbance, shall be allowed to attend any session held pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.9. 6) Violation of the California Penal Code. A person or persons who substantially impairs the conduct of a City Council meeting by knowingly and intentionally violating these rules of decorum may be prosecuted under Penal Code Section 403 for disturbing a public meeting. Every person who violates Penal Code Section 403 is guilty of a misdemeanor. 7) Violations of this Section may also be enforced pursuant to the provisions of Chapters 1.16, 1.20 and 1.21 of this Code. The administrative penalty for violation of this section pursuant to Chapter 1.21 shall be five hundred dollars ($500.00) for the first offense and one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for the second and each subsequent offences or such other amount as may be set by Resolution of the City Council. D. Unlawful behavior. The following conduct shall be unlawful: 1) Engaging in behavior that actually disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of a City Council meeting after receiving a warning at that meeting from the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a City Council Member. 2) Refusing to leave the Council chambers after being barred for the remainder of a City Council meeting by the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a City Council majority. 3) Returning to the Council chambers before the conclusion of a City Council meeting after being barred for the remainder of that meeting by the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a City Council majority. E. Sergeant -at -arms. The Sheriff, or such members of the Sheriff's Department as he or she may designate, shall attend each Council meeting and shall be Sergeant -at -arms of the City Council unless otherwise directed by the City Manager. The Sergeant -at -arms shall carry out all lawful orders given by the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a majority of the City Council for the purpose of maintaining order at City Council meetings. The Sergeant -at -arms shall have the authority and power to enforce the orders of the Mayor, or the presiding officer, or a majority of the City Council relating to the order and conduct of City Council meetings. F. Motion to Enforce. If the Mayor fails to enforce the rules of decorum set forth herein, any Council Member may move to require the Mayor to do so, and an affirmative vote of three members of the Council shall require the Mayor to do so. If the Mayor fails to carry out the will of the majority of the Council in this matter, the Council by an affirmative vote of three Council Members may designate another Council Member to act as Mayor for the limited purpose of enforcing the rules of decorum established herein for that meeting. G. Application to all City Meetings. The provisions of this section shall apply to all public meetings of all commissions, boards and committees of the City as well as the City Council meetings. The term "Mayor" shall be construed to mean presiding office of the commission, board or committee, and "City Council" shall be construed to mean the legislative body of the commission board or committee. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 12th day of October, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Maryann Edwards, Mayor 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2021-04 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of September, 2021, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 12th day of October, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: October 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Authorize a City Sponsorship to Support the Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country and Temecula Valley Horsemen's Association at the January 1, 2022 Pasadena Tournament of Roses (Rose Parade) (At the Request of Subcommittee Members Mayor Edwards and Council Member Stewart) PREPARED BY: Betsy Lowrey, Assistant to the City Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Authorize the City Manager to provide a City Sponsorship that supports the Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country and Temecula Valley Horsemen's Association in the amount of $10,000 for expenses associated with the January 1, 2022 Pasadena Tournament of Roses (Rose Parade); and 2. Appropriate $10,000 from the undesignated General Fund balance to the Economic Development line -item account within the Economic Development Department Budget. BACKGROUND: The Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country (HOT) received notice that their Rose Parade Application was accepted by the Equestrian Committee for the 2022 Pasadena Tournament of Roses, which will be held on January 1, 2022, in Pasadena, CA. Recently, HOT re -titled their Rose Parade entry application to be the Temecula Valley Horsemen's Association (TVHA). Collectively referred to herein as HOT-TVHA, the two groups are merging to collaborate at the Rose Parade and will represent the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley's Equestrian lifestyle. In addition to riding in the five and a half mile -long Rose Parade route on Saturday, January 1, HOT-TVHA is also invited to take part in Equestfest on Wednesday, December 29, 2021, at the Los Angeles Equestrian Center. Participating in the coveted Equestrian Category of the Pasadena Tournament of Roses is a very competitive process. HOT-TVHA is seeking a City sponsorship to provide funding assistance for parade expenses. The Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country previously participated in the January 1, 2020 Rose Parade for the first time, and commendably represented the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley's equestrian, agricultural/ranching, and wine country community. At the time, the City donated $5,000 as an Economic Development Sponsorship. In turn, HOT included the City of Temecula in their promotional/marketing materials and adorned their horses with a custom saddled blanket embroidered with the City of Temecula logo. (See attachment of images reflecting the City's logo on horses.) HOT-TVHA will again commit to similar marketing and promotion of the City of Temecula. The City will also advertise their presence at the Rose Parade. HOT-TVHA are groups deeply rooted in a rural farming, ranching and equestrian lifestyle. Their love of country and pride of city compels them to preserve this rich heritage. Today's Temecula remains a special place where despite busy modern-day life, rural living continues to flourish within our valley's countryside framed with mountains, rolling hills and beautiful vineyards. HOT-TVHA promotes and preserves an attainable, safe lifestyle within the rural and agricultural region. Many members live an equestrian lifestyle and work with the community to keep trail easements secure and safe for public use. The Economic Subcommittee met on September 28, 2021 and determined that HOT-TVHA would represent the City well, again, and that viewership and exposure at the coveted Rose Parade is beneficial to the City of Temecula. This is an economic benefit to the City of Temecula because millions of viewers will be watching the parade. The Rose Parade is America's iconic New Year's Day tradition viewed worldwide. This sophisticated group of equestrian leaders will represent Temecula on a premier stage that will impact our community by attracting new and returning visitors to explore, shop, dine and stay as well as promote filming and potential business expansion opportunities. Below is 2019 viewership data published by the Pasadena Tournament of Roses: Individual Viewership- 37 Million Household Viewership- 27 Million Local Broadcast Household Viewership- 1.9 Million Twitter (@roseparade)- 18,900 Facebook (/roseparade)- 77,900 Instagram (@roseparade)- 17,900 Page Views (toumamentofroses.com)- 2.2 Million The January 1, 2021 Rose Parade was canceled due to COVID-19 concerns, and it is anticipated the January 1, 2022 viewership may rise due to high demand by the public to enjoy this legendary and famously celebrated parade once again. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $10,000 will be appropriated from available General Fund balance to the Economic Development Line -Item Account 001.111.999.5264 within the Economic Development Department Budget. Expenses will be paid directly to vendors. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Press Release published by Tournament of Roses of Equestrians selected for the 2022 Rose Parade including Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country 2. Images of City's logo on horses ATTACHMENT "1" Press Release published by Tournament of Roses of Equestrians selected for the 2022 Rose Parade including Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country EQUESTRIANS SELECTED FOR 2022 ROSE PARADE PASADENA, Calif. (August 26, 2021) — The Pasadena Tournament of Roses® is proud to announce 18 outstanding equestrian groups to ride in the 133rd Rose Parade® presented by Honda, themed "Dream. Believe. Achieve." Equestrians participating in the Rose Parade showcase a variety of breeds as well as unique tack and costumes. All riders must have previous } parade riding experience. In addition to riding in the five and a half mile -long Rose Parade route ,w EflUET#tEA+i on Saturday, January 1, these equestrian groups are invited to take part in Equestfest on ITS Wednesday, December 29, 2021, at the Los Angeles Equestrian Center. During Equestfest, groups perform trick riding, drills, dancing and roping skills, and attendees can walk through the # ` stables and speak with the riders.�Y' 4� Turning the corner of Orange Grove Blvd. and down Colorado Blvd. make a lasting impression. The fantastic lineup of equestrian units will complement the floats and bands that will journey down the 5 1/2-mile route during the 2022 Rose Parade presented 2022 Rose Parade Equestrian units (listed alphabetically): o-1 by Honda. • 1 st Cavalry Division Horse Cavalry Detachment (Fort Hood, Texas) Arabian Horse Association (Sierra Madre, California) • Blue Shadows Mounted Drill Team (Castaic, California) Budweiser Clydesdales (St. Louis, Missouri) • Hawaii Pa'u Riders (Waimanalo, Hawaii) Horsewomen of Temecula Wine Country (Temecula, California) Los Hermanos Banuelos (Altadena, California) Merced County Sheriff Posse (Hilmar, California) Mini Therapy Horses (Calabasas, California) The New Buffalo Soldiers (Shadow Hills, California) Norco Cowgirls Rodeo Drill Team (Norco, California) Norwegian Fjord Horses (Berthoud, Colorado) Painted Ladies Rodeo Performers (Roseville, California) • Scripps Miramar Ranch — American Saddlebred Horses (San Diego, Spirit of the West Riders (Chino Valley, Arizona) • USMC Mounted Color Guard (Barstow, California) The Valley Hunt Club (Pasadena, California) Victorian Roses Ladies Riding Society (Descanso, California) California) ATTACHMENT "2" City's Logo Promoted on HOT Horses Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: October 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Amend the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2022-26 to Add the Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road Project and Approve the Appropriation of Measure "S" Funds. PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2022-26 TO ADD THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL — PROMENADE MALL RING ROAD PROJECT AND APPROVE THE APPROPRIATION OF MEASURE "S" FUNDS 2. Approve the appropriation of $300,000 from Measure "S". BACKGROUND: The Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road project includes the design and construction of a fourth traffic signal on the Promenade Mall Ring Road. The new signal will be constructed at the intersection of the Promenade Mall East and the Ring Road. This is the most easterly entrance to the mall on Winchester Road, just west of Margarita Road. On June 26, 2007, the City and Temecula Town Center Associates, L.P., "Developer," entered into Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. This agreement provided for the development of a Ring Road Enhancement Plan to improve traffic on the Ring Road for the benefit of the Promenade Mall and City streets surrounding the Mall Property. The Ring Road Enhancement Agreement also required the Developer to fund the Ring Road improvements described in the Plan up to a maximum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). The Developer constructed all Ring Road Improvements as required by the Plan except for the fourth traffic signal. The Developer expended $1,955,554 of the $2,000,000 for Ring Road Improvements as required by Ring Road Agreement, leaving $44,446 available for further Ring Road Improvements. On August 27, 2013, the City and Developer entered into a Joint Funding Agreement for Fourth Traffic Signal Promenade Mall Ring Road. According to the Agreement, the City, at its sole cost and expense, shall design and construct the fourth traffic signal on the Ring Road at the Promenade Mall East entrance from Winchester Road just west of Margarita Road. The traffic signal shall include full vehicular and pedestrian controlled movements, interconnection to the Winchester Road/ Promenade Mall East intersection and infrastructure to support future closed circuit video monitoring equipment. The Agreement states that the Developer shall pay the sum of Forty -Four Thousand Four Hundred Forty -Six Dollars ($44,446) toward the cost of the traffic signal. This is the amount available based on the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. City staff and Promenade Mall management have agreed that the fourth traffic signal warrants construction at this time. As stated in the Joint Funding Agreement for the Fourth Traffic Signal Promenade Mall Ring Road, the City will take the lead in the design and construction of the traffic signal. It is necessary to amend the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget to add this project. At the October 6, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed the proposed amendment to the Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget and made a determination that the proposed amendment is consistent with the adopted City of Temecula General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: The amendment of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2022-26 will add Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road Project. This project will be funded with $300,000 from Measure "S" and $44,446 from Developer's Contributions. This brings the total appropriation for this project to $344,446. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Project Description 3. Project Location RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2022-26 TO ADD THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL — PROMENADE MALL RING ROAD PROJECT AND APPROVE THE APPROPRIATION OF MEASURE "S" FUNDS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council finds, determines, and declares that: A. On June 26, 2007, the City and Temecula Town Center Associates, L.P., "Developer," entered into Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. This Agreement provides for the development of a Ring Road Enhancement Plan to improve traffic on the Ring Road for the benefit of the Promenade Mall and City streets surrounding the Mall Property. The Ring Road Agreement also provides for Developer to fund the Ring Road improvements described in the Ring Road Plan up to a maximum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). Developer has constructed all the Ring Road Improvements as required by the Ring Road Plan except for the fourth of the four traffic signals required by the Ring Road Plan. Developer expended $1,955,554 of the $2,000,000 for Ring Road Improvements as required by Ring Road Agreement, leaving $44,446 available for further Ring Road Improvements. B. On August 27, 2013, the City and Developer entered into a Joint Funding Agreement for Fourth Traffic Signal Promenade Mall Ring Road. According to the Agreement, the City, at its sole cost and expense, shall design and construct the fourth traffic signal on the Ring Road at the Promenade Mall East entrance from Winchester Road just west of Margarita Road. The traffic signal shall include full vehicular and pedestrian controlled movements, interconnection to the Winchester Road/ Promenade Mall East intersection and infrastructure to support future closed circuit video monitoring equipment. The Agreement further states that the Developer shall pay the City the sum of Forty -Four Thousand Four Hundred Forty -Six Dollars ($44,446) toward the cost of the traffic signal. This is the amount available based on the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. C. The Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road project includes the design and construction of a fourth traffic signal on the Promenade Mall Ring Road. The new signal will be constructed at the intersection of the Promenade Mall East and the Ring Road. This is the most easterly entrance to the mall on Winchester Road, just west of Margarita Road. D. City staff and Promenade Mall management have agreed that the fourth traffic signal warrants construction at this time. As stated in the Joint Funding Agreement for the Fourth Traffic Signal Promenade Mall Ring Road, the City will take the lead in the design and construction of the traffic signal. E. Adding and appropriating the needed funds for the Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2022-26 is necessary to construct the fourth traffic signal on the Ring Road of the Promenade Mall. F. The Capital Improvement Program as amended by this Resolution is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and each element thereof. Section 2. Amendment of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) A. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2022-26 is hereby amended to incorporate the Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road project. B. An appropriation of $300,000 from Measure "S" for Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road project is hereby approved in Fiscal Year 2022-26. C. Developer's contribution in the amount of $44,446 brings the total appropriation for this project to $344,446 for the Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road project in Fiscal Year 2022-26. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 12th day of October, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 12th day of October, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 33 C-4� AWA The Heart of Southern California Wine Country TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PROMENADE MALL RING ROAD Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will design and construct a fourth traffic signal on the Promenade Mall Ring Road. The new signal will be constructed at the intersection of the Promenade Mall East and the Ring Road. This is the most easterly entrance to the mall on Winchester Road, just west of Margarita Road. The project include full vehicular and pedestrian controlled movements, interconnection to the Winchester Road/ Promenade Mall East intersection and infrastructure to support future closed circuit video monitoring equipment Benefit: This project improves vehicular and pedestrian traffic safety and circulation in the Promenade Mall and surrounding areas. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: This is a new project. Design and preparation of the construction documents will commence after City Council approval. City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program 2021-22 Prior Years 2020-21 Adopted 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration 26,000 26,000 Construction 290,446 290,446 Construction Engineering 8,000 8,000 Design & Environmental 20,000 20,000 Total Expenditures 1 344,446 344,446 Developer's Contribution(u I 44,446 I 44,446 Measure S 300,000 300,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs (1) Per Joint Funding Agreement for Fourth Traffic Signal Promenade Mall Ring Road between the City of Temecula and Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P. dated 08/27/2013. 711E CITY of TEMECULA Traffic Signal - Promenade Mall Ring Road Legend Parcels Street Names Highways HWY . INTERCHANGE . INTERSTATE OFFRAMP ONRAMP . USHWY Hospitals City of Temecula Boundary Public Facilities Parks Schools 4: Notes 1,460.7 0 730.34 1,460.7 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site an is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not b NGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere accurate, current, or otherwise reliable D Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: October 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Tract Map 37509 (Located at the Southwest Corner of Date Street and Ynez Road) PREPARED BY: Ron Moreno, Principal Engineer — Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve Tract Map 37509 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; and 2. Approve the Subdivision Improvement and Monumentation Agreements with the Developer; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND: Meritage Homes of California, Inc., a California Corporation Tract Map 37509 has been approved for subdivision purposes to create 111 single family lots, 31 condominium lots and nine open space lots on 27.86 acres for Heirloom Farms. The property is located at the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. This project is in the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. This tract map subdivides Parcels 1 through 3, inclusive, and Parcel 6 of Parcel Map 36336, as filed in Book 239, Page 33 through 38, inclusive, of parcel maps, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, together with Parcel D of Lot Line Adjustment No. PA15-1434, recorded December 15, 2015 as Instrument No. 2015-0542235 of Official Records of Riverside County, California. Securities have been posted for the public improvements, street, storm drain and traffic signal improvement and monumentation as conditioned by the approval of Tentative Tract Map 37509 by the Planning Commission on January 6, 2021. The property owner/developer has met the terms of the Conditions of Approval for map recordation, and this Tract Map is in conformance with the approved Tentative Tract Map. The approval of a Subdivision Map, which substantially complies with the approved Tentative Tract Map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. All fees have been paid. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fees and Securities Report 2. Vicinity Map 3. Tract Map 37509 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP 37509 Date: October 12, 2021 FAITHFUL LABOR & MATERIALS MONUMENTATION TRACT 37509 PERFORMANCE SECURITY SECURITY SECURITY Traffic Signal $ 552,000 $ 276,000 Street and Storm Drain $ 3,771,500 $ 1,885,750 Monumentation $ 67,400 VICINTY MAP N.T.S. NUMBER OF NUMBERED LOTS = 142 NUMBER OF LETTERED LOTS = 36 NUMBERED LOT ACREAGE = 15.407 LETTERED LOT ACREAGE = 9.952 TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE = 2.497 TOTAL GROSS ACREAGE = 27.856 OWNER'S STATEMENT WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKE AND RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OVER TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE AS SHOWN HEREON. WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND EMERGENCY ACCESS AS DESIGNATED BYQi , AND AS SHOWN HEREON. WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG YNEZ ROAD AND DATE STREET TO THE PUBLIC. THE OWNERS OF LOTS AB AND AC ABUTTING THESE HIGHWAYS AND DURING SUCH TIME WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. ANY CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS DEDICATION AS TO THE PART VACATED. WE ALSO HEREBY RESERVE UNTO OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, OUR ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT LOTS 115, "1", U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, AB, AC, AND AD FOR OPEN SPACE, SLOPE, IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PURPOSES. WE ALSO HEREBY RESERVE UNTO OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, OUR ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT HEIRLOOM DRIVE (LOT AE), BIRCHFIELD DRIVE (LOT AF), ASHTREE STREET (LOT AG), MELROSE DRIVE (LOT AH AND LOT AJ), AND OAKDALE DRIVE (LOT AI) FOR PRIVATE STREET PURPOSES. WE ALSO HEREBY RESERVE UNTO OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, OUR ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT LOTS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, AND T FOR PRIVATE ALLEY. MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AS OWNER m NAME: TITLE: CONDOMINIUM NOTE LOTS 112 - 142 OF THIS MAP ARE TO BE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS AS DEFINED IN SECTION 1350 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE. LOTS 1-1 1 1 ARE FEE SIMPLE AND ARE NOT SUBDIVIDED FOR CONDOMINIUMS. ABANDONMENT NOTE PURSUANT TO SECTION 66434 (G) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE FILING OF THIS TRACT MAP CONSTITUTES ABANDONMENT OF THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS FOR ACCESS PER PARCEL MAP NO. 36336 FILED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE. SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 SIGNATURE OMISSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING INTEREST HOLDERS HAVE BEEN OMITTED: FIDELITY REALTY CORPORATION, HOLDER OF OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS RIGHTS BY DEED RECORDED MAY 22, 1929 IN BOOK 815, PAGE 214 OF DEEDS. HOEHN ENTERPRISE 4 TEMECULA LLC, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 2016 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2016-0073721 AND AS DOCUMENT NO. 2016-0073722 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER RECORDED APRIL 21, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016-0158842 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR ACCESS AND UTILITY MAINTENANCE RECORDED JULY 6, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016-0277692 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016-0470147 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SHEET 1 OF 12 SHEETS FILED THIS DAY OF 20 AT M. IN BOOK OF MAPS, AT PAGES AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA. NO. FEE PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR - COUNTY CLERK - RECORDER BY: DEPUTY SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF MLC HOLDINGS, INC. IN JUNE OF 2020. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN SUCH POSITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT, AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THIS SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN. DATED: m MICHAEL J. KNAPTON, L.S. 8012 CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT LAND S�\ No. 8012 z ��qTF OF CA��Fp��\P I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF TWELVE (12) SHEETS HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND FOUND TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 37509 AS FILED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON JANUARY 6, 2021, THE EXPIRATION DATE TAX BOND CERTIFICATE BEING JANUARY 6, 2024. THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPILED WITH, AND I AM SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $ HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED CORRECT. WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL, AND ALL SPECIAL DATED: 20 ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID BOND FOR PATRICK THOMAS CITY ENGINEER HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. BY: MATTHEW C. HICKS, L.S. 7644 (AS DELEGATED) p LAND s DATE: 20 CITY OF TEMECULA �`�� C 4, �w F CASH OR SURETY BOND MATT JENNINGS cn COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BY: DEPUTY -�l L.S. 7644 £� ��qTF OF CA��Fp��\P TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES, OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO BE $ DATE: MATT JENNINGS, COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR la , DEPUTY CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CLERK, RANDI JOHL, HEREBY APPROVES THE TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF THE EASEMENT FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITIES PURPOSES OVER TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE. WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND EMERGENCY ACCESS. WE ALSO ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG YNEZ ROAD AND DATE STREET AS DEDICATED. DATED: RANDI JOHL CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT. STATE OF COUNTY OF ON BEFORE ME, PERSONALLY APPEARED , A NOTARY PUBLIC WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. SIGNATURE (NAME PRINTED), NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MY COMMISSION NUMBER A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT. STATE OF COUNTY OF ON BEFORE ME, PERSONALLY APPEARED ASS , A NOTARY PUBLIC WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES (NAME PRINTED), NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE MY COMMISSION NUMBER A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT. STATE OF COUNTY OF ON BEFORE ME, PERSONALLY APPEARED , A NOTARY PUBLIC WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES (NAME PRINTED), NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE MY COMMISSION NUMBER SHEET 2 OF 12 SHEETS h W O Project Site �5 o F UiTY P DR 15 �y5� G 7s �O 'G �L F 5 O S� � TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE ki VICINITY MAP N.T.S. "PPBF" N: 2 248 987.066 E: 6 278 618.647 "POINT A" -0°30' 10.07" C.G.F.: 0.9999129919 N2o 2 , 2 Coro `��l w 0 86 0 o�, GAO Off/ O � \ , N Z ROAD_ _ GRID TIE DIAGRAM N.T.S. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA N: 2 139 658.870 E: 6 282 851.638 � DATE STREET 5 3433 Dl 23 2$% l3 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC "BILL" N: 2 154 994.964 E: 6 313 564.161 v �� N u? V f1l N �s �o NSSo06 , Chi o�9 "P477" "POINT B" N: 2 127 663.656 N: 2 138 744.680 E: 6 298 482.750 E: 6 282 595.217 SEPTEMBER 2020 LEGEND INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING BASIS OF BEARINGS SHEET 3 OF 12 SHEETS SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM CCS83, ZONE 6 EPOCH 2010.00, BASED LOCALLY ON NGS AL CORS STATION SYMBOL CORS CONTROL STATIONS "PPBF", "BILL" AND CSRC CGPS STATION "P477" AS INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED HEREON SHOWN HEREON. ALL BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE GRID. QUOTED BEARINGS AND DISTANCES FROM REFERENCE MAPS OR DEEDS ARE AS SHOWN (J INDICATES RECORD DATA PER REFERENCE NOTED PER THAT RECORD REFERENCE. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND S.F.N. SEARCHED, FOUND NOTHING DISTANCES UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. GRID DISTANCES, MAY BE OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING THE GROUND DISTANCE BY A COMBINATION FACTOR OF FD FOUND 0.9999129919. CALCULATIONS ARE MADE AT "POINT A" WITH COORDINATES OF MKD MARKED N: 2139658.870, E: 6282851.638, USING AN ELEVATION OF 1096' NAVD88. BD BRASS DISK CL OR CENTERLINE REC. RECORD ESTAB. ESTABLISHED i i i i i i i i INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS EASEMENT NOTES �1 A PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF HOEHN ENTERPRISE 4 TEMECULA LLC RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 2016 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2016-0073721 AND AS DOCUMENT NO. 2016-0073722 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECORDED APRIL 21, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016-0158842 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A PUBLIC ACCESS AND UTILITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT RECORDED JULY 6, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016-0277692 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016-0470147 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. QAN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND EMERGENCY ACCESS DEDICATED HEREON TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA. DRAINAGE NOTE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS SHEET AFFECTING THIS MAP IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECULA, IN E.C.S. BOOK T, PAGE 415. THIS AFFECTS ALL LOTS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 200 CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS (M) LENGTH (M) DELTA (M) RADIUS (R) LENGTH (R) DELTA (R) REF. CI 863.00' 49.13' A=3° 15'43" 863.00' 49.13' d=03° 15'43" RI & R2 C2 525.00' 66.45' 6=07015'07', 525.00' 66.45' d=07015'07" RI & R2 C3 1660.00' 73.49' A=2032' 1 1" 1600.00' 73.49' 4=02032' 1 1" RI & R2 C4 1600.00' 2.94' A=0°06' 19" 1600.00' 2.94' 4=0000619" RI & R2 C5 1533.00' 8.54' A=00 19'09" 1533.00' 8.54' d=000 19'09" RI & R2 C6 1600.00' 8.54' A=0° 18'21 " 1600.00' 8.54' d=000 1821 " RI & R2 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 PROCEDURE OF SURVEY MONUMENT NOTES REFERENCES: M 1 FD 1-1 /2" COPPERWELD MONUMENT STAMPED "LS 4547", PUNCHED, FLUSH IN AC PER R 1 PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, P.M.B. 239/33-39 R2. ACCEPTED AS POINT ON CL OF DATE STREET. R2 TRACT NO. 29639-2, M.B. 345/ 1-19 M2 FD NAIL & TAG MARKED "LS 4547" FLUSH IN CONCRETE PER R2. ACCEPTED AS POINT R3 LLA NO. PA 15-1434, INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 ON E'LY LINE OF PARCEL 6 OF R 1. M3 FD 1-1/2" COPPERWELD MONUMENT STAMPED "LS 4547", PUNCHED, FLUSH IN AC PER R2. ACCEPTED AS CL INTERSECTION OF DATE STREET AND YNEZ ROAD. M4 FD 1-1/2" COPPERWELD MONUMENT STAMPED "LS 4547", PUNCHED, FLUSH IN AC PER 02 ACCEPTED AS END OF CURVE ON YNEZ ROAD _ MONUMENT SYMBOL MS FD 1-1 /2" COPPERWELD MONUMENT STAMPED "LS 4547", PUNCHED, FLUSH IN AC PER M3 M6 M5 REMOVED FOR CLARITY R2. ACCEPTED AS BEGINNING OF CURVE ON YNEZ ROAD. V4 ol M6 FD 1-1/2" COPPERWELD MONUMENT STAMPED "LS 4547", PUNCHED, FLUSH IN AC PER Nbb°�29 ' PROPOSED MONUMENT NOTES q�. � C4- j� R2. ACCEPTED AS CL INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE. M4 1pR21 o1v�� �v`� g 9c R, & 1. 0 INDICATES SET I" IP W/TAG "LS 8012", FLUSH. S.F.N. \ _L3 N65°53'36"E(RJ YN� �i ���p S.F.N. \ Z RQ i �-L5 2. O INDICATES SET I" IP & TAG "LS 8012", FLUSH, IN THE 00 _ D R1 &R 21 _� \ GROUND OR IN ASPHALT OR A NAIL AND TAG 1S 8012" °o° w�'<;, oo . `; N67°49'08"W ° �pq_51 "„ M� C3 0 ��` a o �`b �33.22' - 0.00' L=1178.46' A=42 12'02" (L=1177.45' A= \ �O IN CONCRETE. �, C2 -_ e °o - - - .-C 1 N25° 14'52"W �5 S.F.N. o �D' (33.21' R 1) L=1175.52' A=42°05'43" - - 3. SET I" IP & TAG "LS 8012", FLUSH, IN THE GROUND OR IN 1 &R2) i 29.99' ASPHALT OR A NAIL AND TAG "LS 8012" IN CONCRETE AT ALL R=7655. ° M& R i (30.13' R l &R2) 00' L=)027.41- A=35034'07" (1 =1026.36' A=35 31 '57' i i b�' \ G LOT CORNERS, EC'S, BC'S AND CORNER CUTBACKS, UNLESS N30°19'28"E(R)J 2 OTHERWISE NOTED. PRC 39' N33°35' 1 1 "E(R)J 'Too Q 4. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN 39, PRC ? o, ACCORDANCE WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE 461.9 N26°20'04"E(R)- r "0 -0 AND THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT FOR THIS MAP. PCC o N�.b d �r z -0 04 110, ow- _ C) b M2 �0 `n �;a Q / (R= 148.00'L=39.21' M&R 1 &R2)`„� A=15°10'41" (A=15°10'42" R1 &R2) i i 1�b N59009' 13"W(R) PRCJ i� \ (R=196.00' L=51.92' M &R 1 &R2), �11 ? A=15010'41" (A=15010'42" R1 &R2) Lrlo 61 tx •oo � w -N80040'48"E(R) Q �� / N80°40'48"E ,---(78.00-M&RI&R2) Q� S.F.N. N80040'48"E(R) ESTAB AT REC. ANGLE PER M 1 MONUMENT SYMBOL G� M 1 - M3 AND DIST. PER M2. b� REMOVED FOR CLARITY L8- ` C6-N74001'33"W(R) G N74 ° 19'54 "W I9S67.00' 4„4;3j° N74000'45' W(R)J Q P M�R19 S2„ _ N38°39'03"E(R)-\ 50 p0 M &Rl W &R21 � R2� \ �,, ` N40°39'04" P (731.53'M&RI) N39°26'24"E(R)�\ (L=340.95 22 ° 585, R=889.00' a N56006'59"E O � (L=IS3.75') �(40.80'M&R3) (4=9054'32" M&R3) Q SHEET 4 OF 12 SHEETS LINE DATA TABLE - BEARING (M) LENGTH (M) BEARING (R 1 &R2) LENGTH (R 1 &R2) L 1 N240 00' 05"W 59.93' N23059'49"W 59.92' L2 N650 53' 36"E 55.00' N65053'52"E 55.00' L3 N240 00' 00"W 39.00' N23059'49"W 39.00' L4 N230 4753"E 60.00' - - L5 N660 12' 07"W 28.94' N66009'40"W 29.89' L6 N740 19' 54"W 95.41' N74019'43"W 95.41' L7 N 150 40' 06"E 54.60' N 15°40' 17"E 54.60' L8 N740 19' 54"W 12.00' N74019'43"W 12.00' SHEET 5 OF 12 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 0 100 200 400 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 SHEET INDEX MAP LEGEND INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP INDICATES SHEET LIMITS OX O INDICATES SHEET NUMBER INDICATES FIRST LOT AND LAST LOT -FEZ ROAD Iw AB AC HEIRLOOM qI LOT AE DRIVE IP4 Iw AC �� I U AD Y LOT AG k LOT Al � OAKDALE AB DRIVE 11 - - I I TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 LINE DATA TABLE - BEARING LENGTH L 1 N040 19' 25"W 24.00' L2 N 180 36' 32"E 24.00' L3 N41 ° 32' 44"E 24.00' L4 N290 31' 07W 24.00' L5 N31 ° 31' 59"W 24.00' L6 N360 15' 50"W 24.00' L7 N290 31' 07W 34.25' L8 N670 49' 53"W 28.01' L9 N590 00' 00"E 60.00' CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C 1 481.00' 33.58' A=4°00'02" C2 335.00' 36.52' A=6° 14'53" C3 335.00' 52.80' A=9001 '53" C4 335.00' 24.01' A=4°06'20" C5 335.00' 24.01' A=4006'20" C6 335.00' 24.01' A=4°06'20" C7 335.00' 7.36' A=1 ° 15'32" C8 68.00' 41.99' A=35022'52" C9 68.00' 24.69' A=20048'00" CIO 68.00' 46.46' A=39008'42" CI1 1790.00, 18.50' A=0035'3I" C 12 1790.00' 24.00' A=0046'05" C 13 1790.00' 24.00' A=0046'06" C 14 1668.00' 2.95' A=0006'04" C 15 18.00' 28.27' A=90000'00" C 16 18.00' 28.52' A=90°46'42" C 17 52.00' 35.66' A=39017'49" C 18 26.49' 20.96' A=45019'47" C 19 1850.00' 1 1.15' A=0020'43" C20 275.00' 20.09' A=4011'12" C21 18.00' 2.61' A=8019-21" C22 1790.00' 4.64' A=0008'56" TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE SEE SHEET 1 I SHEET 8 OF 12 3FffT3 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO 1.7snq. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 M6 N66000'00"E 19_2.88' _ - 78.00 .1 o- / o oI LO NOTES: - _ EMI M 01 SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS. 1"�� / N28°00'02"W(R)� _ N66°00'00"E 1 14.88' z I �'6�° IIt Oo Lo " N36°53'55"W(R)� ` - - N66000'00"E 105.54' - ��0 , Z SEE SHEET 4 FOR MONUMENT NOTES. cP - C 1 � 97.02' �� L=2.94_ ' LOT AB ` L=7 4.7 0 LOT I N65°42'54"E(RJ�d' �. 6 0006' 19" M5 SEE SHEET 1 1 FOR EXISTING EASEMENTS. SEE SHEET 11. ��=g° 5 3 5 3 8.52 �' J 3,098 SQ. FT. C 14� ° L�96.2 00" 18.00'� � N65 53'36"E °,6q / , 1 \ �'"OPEN SPACE" 1 13.68' �i 55.00' Ob N48021'55"W(R) �'11028 '_ N60°28'S3"E 131.68' %�N48°27' 18"W 9.64' N65036'50"E(R)- M 12.00' 3 i y pp - N b.1 o i� 120 10 N p q5% °3q0� g-12.00' w °0M `�' 7,445 SQ. FT. -' d �q %b Ob 0 �q b 3 �a, °0 3 Z N60028'53"E 1 1.05'- 12.00'- / c�D�q �`i �Ob° 3q p�1,° `L$ 1 9,6812Q. FT. 0 1 60°28'S3"E 97.87' 1 / �,Nr� 1 D 01 C`J - N i \ N CV �f -N59050'23"W R ° 122 z o () 10,293 SO. FT. 01 LOTH 12.00'- - it �, �� o 1 7,515 SQ. FT. ` 1 1 00 N �9 gb3�3q 0'A �b _ N60°28'S3"E 97.88 J � a 123 � N60°01'10"E(RJ� Lo ��o 10,311 SO. FT. w •-C7 1 0 00 ii ^ 11 `� N ° ° N36°59'35"W(R)� �� F-N35044'03"W(R) N59°42' 1 1 "E(RJ PRC a a F�-� d °p -N71 23'28"W 9.92' N71 ° 19'02"W(R) \ �'- \ 12.00' �6, 5 5 0 3, \\ �i PCC C8 �. ' -C 18 �� / °24 41" R=68.00, d N � o �'�% ° D,9 N00°21' 1 1 "W(R) R=68.00'-Ii �`Ij�It 9 .,�N81 °00'00"W(R) PRC 119 o F�-� ii o 124 °�, N50 30'36"W(R)� ° �' o n ii -12.00' N74 39'03"W(R) R=26.49'�4'��, ',rr. \C21 15,079 SQ. FT. I D LOT AB1010 ,324 SO. FT. �N46°24' 16"W R � , & ° M SEE SHEET 1 1. �° 5 0 S° `N20 26'49"E(R) R=68.00' �� �� 1 1 2� .5 5 �, .��o, oC�-N89° 19'21 "W(R) R=18.00' 00 / �gb��cb�` � ���0 � ° � / Flo o � � N59°55'26"W(R)� ° �= w-N59035'3 I "E R PRC 11 u �� 80 N67 32'38"W 13.74'-)N ? O N58°28'Ol"E 14.38'- � l i /fQ �" 6� / N35°44'03"W(R)� i �0 �� 00'- 30 1 \ Cl1-N59000'00"E(R) 1 T T �_ ° J�6 q°�� N62° 1 1'33"W R D'2b° 2-N59°20'43"E(R) / _ , / N82 4749"W R (J b8 C 19- pp' 30.00 = , _ -C22 107•65' "' () �o D ° ,�24 LOT X , 30. _ _�= - - N5802801 "E 125 12.00'- - i N58°27'40"E(R) �.i N61 07'S3"W � � 2,565 SQ. FT. - L9 � 1 � 10,336 SQ. FT. - (3 GE' 'i �,-N58°51'04"E(RJ N69020'16"W(R) 5.00' 1 00 SPP 15, 15' ° I .`L1 „OPEN E 147 57 N59 00'00"E(RJ U 107.65' 0 1 ti8 N73°26'36"W R �. ,Gp� N62°10'23"W(R)� /�i �' N49°21'03 96 0 °�° _ N58°28'O1"E 2° (J / _ op' - ° LOT G o c, 1 C20� 44 3,143 0 N58 04'S9"E(RJ ,n ab N� �26 O� O �� - 2,585SQ. FT. ,�� N66 21 35"W(R)- 'i ° ° ° 0O ° 95 o SQ. FT. o�h i \ 460p 2,640 0 DJa �N57°07'12"E(R)� �' ^O 2.05'- , 94 o SO. FT. - ° -N85°40'35"E 10.12' Cb'°A,\ 3,1 16 o w �' �. _ I °N° o� 118 a 55' v t. � SQ. FT. o � �? _ o <- 14,843 SQ. FT. `�' l Ii� 12.00' 10,34?SQ. FT. N82°51'26"W(RJ� ; �� pq , �� °`LO o �, i z q 3 !�47 96 ,�� o 0 o i' � 12 - 2 87, �n o ch N85°43' 14"E(RJ c.i ri -- / - ° `' i� i v O 00 c�� Q'�a` �b ° 0 0/ 440p 9 8 f '- co 0 0 (S0' o a o u n N80040'48"E(R)7 A.- I ` h o C\ 0 ^ h M 0, 11 1 Q 0 M ( 11 '4� a o M cv It 0; 00 O N O 11 J C I 10 O n o It 0; N h n N8S° ° h �h qq/ '`�S Z f' 88, 44 Opl,og"E �� Z N �v o 1 °° _ `Y'a 403SF N87 43'44"E(RJ�\ ii� °`� �rb W ,� O JQ �� 57 'i - N�9 2 o ,0 ° °° "_ \� ��°° -12.00' 1 I36 ♦ �' �. q7' a w u n ii A c� on 40 8pQ� �� 52' �z �' o ro 97 � 11 cv m oN 00 8E N80°38-37"E(RJ 328�%` � �'�; i - �-- o 98 C `-- 2,947 M �'� o% N53044'10"E 14.39'- T n 12.00' i °� Q FT �V / Cy O a / °o w� SQ. FT. �_ _ / ° / N N 01 �� o SEE DETAIL "A" / o 2,640 68, ° i � N54°07' 13"E R 5' , N53 43'50"E(R) ^' o I36 i �/ h SHEET 0` 99 SQ. FT. i� 45• 'i N55 14'S4"E(RJ , (J 1o7.6 i h 10 0 80- C� 1� N w� 3,296 o' - 5501 - 1 N53°g4'10"E r01 CO ii w 0 D rJ\�F T 12.00'- v 127 _. j� SQ. FT. `pop, %E ��6.5g 102 n W T F 8,219 SQ. FT. ° ; - 44. 1 03 Z �° o Q ce �►O Q. FT• M it N8337'24"E(RJ oN 569o�i - N4q 2 0 3,134 N H 1 2,58 4 S SQ. FT. Ul w 65' a �i N8S° 30, 1 1' 47.57 101 0 Q w N5 °441 O'E 107 10 4 3 0\ LN77°42'51 "E(R) 03S"F "� �%'� 3 L 0 T A D o'-' 2,640 0 J O> ^ I3S N74°35'31 "E v 0' cr 100 0 \ 0 06 13.50' ��� �'�',, 2,965 0 SQ. FT. �N53°21'07"E(RJ It N it �1 60' o SQ. FT. o y�`J 49 80' \ - 0 11 �42.80 - 44 3T �N53°22'59"E(R) o a N74035-31 "E R J ° 44 0 o3„E 1 LOT AB LOT U () N40 38'S7"W _ � i � � °21' a o 10,003 SQ. FT. ° 15.00'c �. 5� 52` - N49 N 117 SEE SHEET 11. "OPEN SPACE" N68 20'38"E(R)� �v N ` t o N68020'38"E 13.50'-,�-�104 N - 10,3 \ J-N65016'00"E(R) 135.11, / SEE DETAIL "A" N57°15'47 E 128 9.3 92 V 105 SHEET8 SEE SHEET 7 SEE SHEET 8 o� L7 I ooi oo I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 0 20 40 80 I LL, I �u I L o I of 0 I R=2.00' _ I t R=2.00' I L=3.14' 4=90°00'00 ZI z�,'-L=3.14' 4=90-00,00'. I N40°39'04"W-�� \ N40°39'04"W < I 1.00, - 10.00_ I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I L 12' 24' � J DETAIL "B" NOT TO SCALE `V w _ cn w LL.I IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 -17.03' SEE DETAIL "D" SEE DETAIL "C" -N33°1753"W 77 SHEET 12 490 �i 60.00' 03 - N39°31 'O6"W 162.02' SHEET 12 42.02' -� �. 60.00' r- i i 60.00' _7 LOT AD 92 <r 2,760 SQ. Fr. o I I I 011"91 88 N33°17' �Q) - j3,201 SQ. Fr. aoq °6 2,880 SQ. FT o o 87 0p o 5u I. S3" o <r- / W I '- h� o I o �i_ I 3,1 14 SQ. FT. o N i 60.00' ,� o (N33°31'19" o N39°31'06" � 4jo oo L 0 T W 60.00' o N39042'S2"W i 64.74' - O o I 60.00' ! v 93 I 90 12'00 3,157 SQ. Fr. - ( N �O 0 Q� h 2 L_ 3,259 SQ. Fr. o ooLo 89 I o o� 12 86 0 Lo \I �; 12' N �Z 3,120 SQ. FT. I c-i o` I 2,886 SQ. FT. N Z \ N69 18' 15"E(R)— R _4 \1 60 49, (il `� / �` 24' I Ql yl i �z I� 24' w 11 l c3 R;2 j 6 -1,_ ;�I i L-N56°42'07"E(R) / I `. / I 9.38'- 23.23, S.Op C3 40.08' l% 60.00'50.62' - `--1 3p6 00 4�67°20'43 - - N39031'06"W 194.32' 4,49924 4;9 ° MELROSE ol� ,� �\ �3500-N68°20'38"E(R) N3913u'O6'W 194,62- 43.92' T N0501o,on F1R1---i p _-67�2 \ I, 4c8 o �R, S 34, 00'2S„ 490. p0, 4' 1 0 1 4 706 °39,04 912.1 p 2 „ 4 �106 °39'44„ 9.2 9. 68 4'31 °19'S2„ 4 =70— �4z� __R; `N57° 15'35"E(R) - 39'44„ ==31=d=31°101 "" -- N40"3Y'04' SEE SHEET 11. SEE DETAIL "E" SHEET 12 0 0 0 0 N Lo CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS LENGTH DELTA Cl 335.00' 27.63' A=4°43'30" C2 335.00' 24.01' A=4006'20" C3 275.00' 29.86' A=6° 13' 13" AInTCQ- SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS. SEE SHEET 4 FOR MONUMENT NOTES. SEE SHEET 1 I FOR EXISTING EASEMENTS. SEE SHEET 8 SEE DETAIL "B" SEE DETAIL "B" SEE DETAIL "B" THIS SHEET THIS SHEET THIS SHEET N40°39'04"W 420.00' 60.00' / 60.00' %i 60.00' 60.00' %i 60.00' 1 F / i�- 1 60.00' %i 60.00' SHEET 7 OF 12 SHEETS LINE DATA TABLE - BEARING LENGTH L 1 N320 44' 13"W 24.00' L2 N390 31' 06"W 24.00' L3 N400 39' 04"W 24.00' L4 N400 39' 04"W 24.00' L5 N400 39' 04"W 24.00' L6 N400 39' 04"W 24.00' L7 N400 39' 04"W 9.00, L8 N500 28' S4"E 60.00' I O O I I O O I ( O O O 83 82 77 76 � � 71 70 � c, 65 2,820 SQ. Fr. I I o 0o I �3,060 SQ. Fr. 2,820 SQ. Fr. I I io 0o I (3,060 SQ. FT. 2,820 SQ. Fr. I I i-oo o I I3,060 SQ. FT. 2,820 SQ. Fr. N40°39'04"W I o ° N40039'04"W Lrt � �o IJ ° N40°39'04"W L� ono fiJ ° o N40°39'04"l� 60.00' �. "�� N40 39'04"W �_ 60.00' �. N40 39'04"W �_ 60.00' cl I 39'04"W cn /_ 60.00' 60.00' ! I 60.00'-� 60.00' �r �. I - � ;o 12' o I � � � 12' I � 01 ° � o_ o_'� I"Ooo01 0o I oo�I CD CD I 000l o0o I o 84 �� �� 81 78 75 72 69 66 0 - 1 Nit pro I O" `t I oaf v� I v I oar vo 12,640 SQ. Fr. �aNt 2,640 SQ. Fr. I o� o 2,640 SQ. FT. -v 2,640 SQ. FT. - v 2,640 SQ. Fr. w �t 2,640 SQ. FT. - v �r 2,640 SQ. Fr. w �r<r 12' �{ ZI o 12' �a ZI o Z Z Nr IN N N40039'04"W N40039'04"W N40039'04"W N40039'04"W w- N40°39'04"W `L'- I N40°39'04"W W- I - N40°39'04"W - 60.00' o 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' Lo o o I 60.00' � I 1 60.00' 0 12 l I 160.00' 12 o I I~ I ° - 3,128o SQ. Fr. I � � I 80 0..",:,:' 0 79 I o o I 74 00 0 73 0 0 68 0 0 67 "to � 2,880 SQ. FT. � 3,120 SQ. Fr. II c-i 00 INt11 2,880 SQ. FT. �06 "' 3,120 SQ. FT. I N 00 1 2,880 SQ. Fr. � N 3,120 SQ. FT. 1 Z Q�24 Z d Qj �l I h l 24' z d I I I `ztI I I I I Lo I I �\ �24' \ 01 �\ nIT \I /, in nn, \I / in nIT I \I TEMECULA DRIVE CENTER —DRIVE SEE SHEET 11. N40039nd"W 7,11.53' N40039'04"W 514.60' LOT AH "PRIVATE STREET' SEE SHEET 11. N40039'04"W 731.53' SEE DETAIL "B" THIS SHEET 63 I-- 12 62 I F- 24' 00 — 00 r1l i GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 NOTES: SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 SHEET 8 OF 12 SHEETS i 24' i II 12 12 I I I R=2.00' R=2.00' I -L=3.14' ��-L=3.14' d=90000'00" i d=90°00'00" �� IN40038'57"W-ll 10.00' i� N40038'57"W 1.00, I w I w o- - SEE SHEET4 FOR MONUMENT NOTES. / - oo o 1I a -- SEE SHEET 1 1 FOR EXISTING EASEMENTS. / I z ^� Z / - L8 LOT AC SEE SHEET 11. YNEZ ° - -��- � _ � L=597.1 21�2310211 - N31°54'03"E(R)� \ - - _ - ` - R=1 L=1178.46'=42 12 0� _ N34°17'39"E 13.87' - L=578.37' 2A= 0°42'41"12.00'- N45°0'55"E(R) - L7 Lu �1N36°4241 "E(RJ� ° 5q' 57' o 00 - L_375.48 �4=12 4p 04 p%4°48 38, j `n '- c) L 1 ti� -co �0 "' N43°19'26"E(RJ� 12°5g 11" _�--N34°17'39"E 13.90' - LOT AB R=1655.00' L=1027.41' A-35°34'07" S45°11'45"W(RJ� z I 8 pp L- �_4 4 12 pp_ , / -\2.00' � SEE SHEET 11. - L=108•44 _ � 377• ° 9'3q Z N47°04'41 "E(RJ- i A=3°45'15" R=166 L_j40 54' - L6 ° m 112 �� - N53043'50"E(R) L=543.48' A=78048'5.5 C10 - --N41032'20"E(R) I �' =166 00 - C9 �\ C5 L3' I SEE DETAIL "H" L=137.95' A=4°44'19" .6 A= 8° 2 " C6 lI ! �" /I 1 `T SHEET 12 I w 113 O N53044' 10"E 14.39'- _ ° �� r-; L 10-- i L ° N48 59-31 "E R-12.00' i �''� _ �, �\ N43 19'55"E R I \ Z ° 14,230 SQ. FT. 12.00'--12.00' ()- - () o N49 21'03"E 14.72'- N47°04'33"E(RJJ � � I -L 12° w� L 1 12.00'- 1, % -L9 N45 35'50"E i ° u o i L2 N02038'43"E -C3 ' -C7 �i `� I8.28' CIQ 18.19'� C2 --CI 1 Y o LOT Z �� i LOT AA Z 114 O I 1, 071 SQ. FT. 66' Z `-' o o , cv � "OPEN SPACE" 996 SQ. FT. Q 14,848 SQ. FT. o_ - r< �r Q O - L 10 "OPEN SPACE" ° w o N 118 w 117 w` 116 - �O� IWQN� 01 115 W OJN m 116°° _0 14,832 SQ. FT. M c � 7,099 SQ. FT. M w o N W w ►-� ►-� w 9,165 SQ. FT. m � w J Z�r az � z "OPEN SPACE" a 61 c4 „W410 30 __oN Q, Na 01 N55°42'21a a a zz 116 pp' " oo CL `O ° �? 33' 33' o _ 410 3p, - o \\ �N53 21 '07"E(R) N 0.23'�°42 2 -C4 � 2.57'- � � SEE DETAIL F L=123.30' A=3°56'47" rr " �- 54.78' °� - 33.00' �� 33.00'- �'-3.79' - SHEET 12 'ii ` \ 46 N ti--R=179o.00 L=319.95' A-10014'28" -� N40038'57"W 77.07' �i�N40°30'18"W N40°30'18"W 36.94' R=170.00 / 00 , ° w ° ()J ° �i a N 10° 17'07"W r r ° 4.67' p - bp. \ i (-n \ 3,120 SQ. FT. c y BIRCHFIELD N49 24'20"E R N70 47'S3"W_ N40 38'S7"W L-4° 24" / 411. 2 \Z� \ U' W 13.88' 6 13.91' A=15 03' �1 41 \ o00 \-- / w S5°42'21„ 60 pp' i 2,880 SQ. FT. �o 24 m LL1 - C8 N ' �-12 \. _R=182 325.31' A=10°14'28" -.�._ 121.97' ! �- 82.03' -h- �N36°37'48"E(RJ pp 40 N o \w \ „� �j w - - - R=1850.00' - N40038'57"W 204.00' - ' 30 pp i 60 \ \ 3,120 SQ. FT. 0 12, ! N55°4'2 o /1 8 W N53022'59"E R -\ ti� N4903947"E R `t O - L=322.71' O R=260 44, /� � 'ij � 35 \ w� "' \ 1"W � I `� � 60 pp1 � � N40°38'57"W L= 62 o N 4' ! ° 2 \ w N\ o 50 i \ \�- 2 5 42� o � A-9°59'40" �N51 31'19"E(RJ � N40°38'S7"W 9.97'�` °p3�24" - _ � 2,880 SQ. FT. � N5 0 49.91' - A=15 v, • 0 12 O0 \ \ 45 %/ � L=60.02' %/ �. , L=10.09' � � L 0 T A � � �- L=51.06' � � = L=9.38' Z. j \ 2,640 SQ. FT. I I A=1°51'40" A=12°43'15" \ i ` \ d=2020'09" �� \ cn\ I \ °42'21„W 42 \ \ \ 24' -� i I A=1°51'32" I `i #d=0°18'44" o \ w� Ln \ 12 .' �j N55 00, Z� 0 2,640 SO. FT. \ \ M I If N 1 Vv \ N by w'O O I \ 1 03 0 24' M Qj "PRIVATE STREET' �„ 30 �� , 4 34 I ° 2 \ ° 2 \ 2 w 55 42 w 55 42 10 2 M 108 I o I v� 9' 3,124 SQ. FT. N 39 N 49 I 12,911 SO. FT. M`t M °�° 109 w w \--121 p SQ FT•�n 60.00' \oo� moo\ 2,640 SQ. FT. w I °42'21„W \ 'j 6p.00' M 3,151 SQ. FT. I - o I 2,880 SQ. FT. P 12 \ o \ 5 / o I� 12' CO �. I oN I \ m \ I \ 3, ° 21„W 36 \ o °, \ NS by 0p `\ o i \ 44 0 -_ N40°38'S7"W w l I �� �_ ° �, o �0 121 \ I ` \N5564 OD o 0 2,640 SQ. FT. \ I \\ 1"W I `\ oo ,\ 2,820 SQ. FT. 60.00' > N40°38'S7"W w-� ! I N40 38'S7"W j � m ! N55°42 \'P PN\ 33 N55°42 2 o P cr 43 0 - I 21" \ 3,060 SQ. FT. 60 00 I I o oM 60.00' 0 �� I 00, �� oo�r o I a o 0 60.00' I o0 oLricr o w o bp. \ o 'o�\ 2,640 SQ. FT. ! °42' "N \��\1 60 o 'o \ 110 N 31 \X.\ N55 pp, `\� o o 104 I NO �tN o 2,640 SQ. FT. \ 60. \ 38 NW 12,640 SQ. FT. �� 107 12' o W I 37 \ oo'I j\2,820 SO. FT. I 60 00' 12' i �-o I z ^ I 2,640 SQ. FT. N 0 1„W \ �. / 1„ 2,640 SQ. FT. I z I 12 N55°42'2 - ! \ N55°420 v, \� 98 52, ° _ 60 00 j \ 6p.00' � f 3,060 SQ. FT. p0' W 3 N40 38'57"W I ° z L 0 T W !� \ o \`. ` 6p' 42 1 I I N40 38'S7"W \ 32 I� z o 60.00' N40°38'57"W i o 60.00' 'I u N, oN55° SEEDS SHEET ET 12 i o 60.00' I O I \ N Ni \ 2,758 SQ. FT. � - p pp' \ SEE DETAIL 7' �? 6 10 0 105 N 106 I 111 O SHEET 12 \� �y 52' - 13,068 SQ. FT. i LO �2,760 SQ. FT. JI 3,000 SO. FT. o 38• SEEDSHEET DETAIL 2 L 0 T Y I ` I ` `-N40039'04"W 22.24' L ` `� �- 60.00' L `� �- 60.00' N38029' 10"W - - N40038'57"W 120.00' ' SEE DETAIL "A„ 60.04 THIS SHEET LOT AD SEED S SHEET SEE SHEET 7 NOT TO SCALE LINE DATA TABLE - BEARING LENGTH L 1 N360 15' 50"W 24.00' L2 N400 38' 57"W 24.00' L3 N550 42' 21 "W 18.00' L4 N340 1739"E 18.00' L5 N340 1739"E 18.00' L6 N550 42' 21 "W 24.00' L7 N550 42' 21 "W 24.00' L8 N400 38' 57"W 9.00, L9 N450 35' 50'E 1 1.30' L 10 N450 35' 50"E 12.06' L 1 1 N21 ° 01' 36"W 9.53' L 12 N880 08' 10"E 18.68' L 13 N640 14' 49"W 9.79' L 14 N020 38' 43'E 31.36' L 15 N880 08' 10"E 31.14' CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C 1 21 1.75' 14.41' A=3°53'52" C2 203.00' 13.81' A=3053'52" C3 137.00' 9.32' A=3053'52" C4 1790.00' 1.71' A=0003'17" C5 1668.00' 52.20' A=1 04735" C6 1668.00' 55.78' A=1 °54'58" C7 170.00' 11.57' A=3053'52" C8 200.00' 52.56' A=15003'24" C9 1655.00' 54.37' A=1 052'57" CIO 1655.00' 54.07' A=1 052' 19" W, 139 'It 10 o� N LOT T IN29°05'39"E(R)-7 z �. - L 16 L4- L 17• L=65.83' L13- - -L 14 =4042'12" L 15 R=802.00' - L11 -L18- I L=283.51' 0=20015'77" LOT AC L 1 I wrl 140 CO CD 0 M Z r--N25°40'34"E(R) L=59.80' _ ' �L12 R=802.00' _ �l L=140.09' A=10°00'28" IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO 1.7snq. SHEET 9 OF 12 SHEETS GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 NOTES: ` SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS. J SEE SHEET 10 � ` SEE DETAIL "J" / 2 z SEE SHEET FOR MONUMENT NOTES. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 z 18 SHEET 10 SEE SHEET 1 1 FOR EXISTING EASEMENTS. 19 \ D � 742 _�\ N1 2°2 f 10.97'-� \vw P �s oo 00-1 CD 0' -��pS/�3,3/5130 SQ. FT. -(R/)-I'- 30 Lo 13.83' o d=34725"_z i rt N59°09' 13"W (R) 0°39, \ Zo o 2,640 SQ. FT. m 3 (R)2 % 1_ i zz z wo 3,3303Q. FT. m 15p $ g4.00, ' 52.83 n r N M2 53 �,? - W N�2 0, - �� z 26 W 2,748 SQ. FT. w� �`'� w i�' S553 q8' \ Z 25 o w 3,038 SQ. FT.%� I oow ctilt 00390SQ. FT. .. 7 24 w \ 0 3,296 SQ. FT. o? 13' 67, 5p 67' _ �i 54 N mi ` i ` D N72°?7 2 53 16 % 3,900 SQ. FT. "�: ! i 0 (R)3 / _ �' 44. p ' / \ IV40°39' I (R)4-\ - ��C5 ' q3 p0' - A 3 02 / SEE DETAIL "J" 00, OS .o � M / I- 1, I �3� / SHEET 10 Z LOT V - : � r _ 5 27 •o 858 SQ. FT. 19j 028, ly �(RJ610 � \ p \I �O Z N 3,697 SQ. FT. \(05 EN SPACE" C 17- �� () LOT AC R 7� \, a I R 5 N � oN860 a N l SEE SHEET 11.co 12.00'- _ . CID SQ. FT. `� o O z 29 c SQ. FT. ,4°28, - i SQ. FT. d" ° aN a' m �1.12 1�Ui N40 22'S9"E R h m N40°39 �S L=I3 R-770. p 9" �i l L=60.43' i i ° O �'O�� a 0 2,990 SQ. FT. pp, - iLn p4„ �i 7 S 0' 4-4° , r-N39 06'53"E(R) $ �h V `r N 4�• 12 12.00'- I- \wS,dT�3 4 =1Q° 29'48" ,.! �i,' I C 14- = G� G ��0 0 131 LLI 6p, l L1 74 03„ �N44°52'47 E(RJ _ ` / �'O�� ` . m �b p0' ,2°2742 L2 �1 v° W T - 36.21 ' - _. O / Rz=: L=17.04'_ j ° �N34°14'24"E(RJ p� c� i -(R)8 \ N FT 1 N72°2742"W o Z N40°39 R/I / E 0=42_89 4=1 ° 16'O6" N50 53'07"W b �� 3 �� D 1 55 Sa (J - / o Ln 04„� 4U-i69 STREET, 4 03„ N50°53'07"W L=98'3, 58 ��/.,`L�° 5��� `L �� 86.6 CC9 �. "� o LL.I DETAIL 1" NOT TO SCALE SEE DETAIL "B" SHEET 7 1rl ��43� 1.35 N49020'55"E- 5.10' l i 0 - ,1--N48°31 13 E(R) - - 36.21' A=bb°1�� �D��1�� �O N'2°2�'A2'W42 19' i °�; r� 1� - �� L= R'830.40. ° NO1609-01"W(R) R = 1 15.00'� %� 'i i i i 14g.2S' N50 53'07"WS0 N o L-`S6.65' 4=10°14'0 36 21' " N86°39'42"W(R) R = 18.00'- -i -CIO 4- 3 i C� -3 ° 54'37" il L=56.62'11 5� i N44036'36"E(R)- 4=3054,32„ � _C72-�� 35.19\ \ �C 1 l�i q°09 52 \ 2 1 N40042'04"E(R)J 1.02'- �-N28000'51 "E(R) L O c�,10 OR\0 JM a 136 9,067 SQ. FT. °- 2 r -12.00 Z N N m N i ° 0 3 141 �` w o 00 � �,, 10,534 SQ. FT. N ,0 CO � � � rn co 140 N 137 a ~ 0- �u � w '� 139 w 10,505 SQ. FT. 00 co 9,175 SQ. FT. �; ° _1 � - 138 w - ") 9,931 SQ. FT. ° M M 9,496 SQ. FT. ,� N o 12.00'- i 2 "� 2 cn Z cv Z \V40° L> -12. 00' L=52.,30, �N45°36'46"E(R) 39p4„ - 4=3° � SOS3 j W - - - 44'10" _i. i L=80.67' 12.00'- r 4=5° -L5 / i,%-N39°51'34"E 7.38' ��N33°47'S1"E(R) 45'48" 12.00'-/ ; i L=84.71' L=65.83' N40°39 p4„ ` \3 j 53, W LOT AC SEE SHEET 11. CULA CE L _158.7 I NTE�IOR41'S= R �� N40°39 R DRIVE--, 04„ 731.53, W SEE SyEET I -� b =889.00, L- °o 153.75 h�O , 4=9°.Se'Qn„ 9 i R=802.00' L=283.51' A=20015'17" LN39°50'58"E(R) R=850.00' L=499.66' A=33°40'50" N21°24'15"E(R)- 1 L=59.80' 0=4 a=802.00� .rw_s7„ SEE DETAIL "L" THIS SHEET 12.00'- _ L;gp.2 Sq„ 5° 4A 8„ 2.66'- �: °p0'2 69' p;10 LINE DATA TABLE - BEARING LENGTH L 1 N 170 32' 18"E 24.00' L2 N720 27' 42"W 29.63' L3 N720 27' 42"W 24.00' L5 N500 08' 41 "W 24.00' L6 N400 39' 04"W 24.00' L7 N400 39' 04"W 28.26' L8 N 150 40' 06"E 416.10" L9 N 150 40' 06"E 421.06' L10 N270 1 1' 05"W 60.00' L I 1 N720 23' 23"W 15.82' L 12 N500 22' 55"W 12.86' L 13 N620 43' 25"W 3.93' L 14 N270 39' 47"E 3.21' L 15 N620 43' 25"W 15.75' L 16 N620 20' 13"W 12. 00' L 17 N62° 20' 13"W 12. 00' L 18 N62° 43' 25"W 19.68' 142 10,447 SQ. FT. 1q, N60040'06"E 19.12'7- - N 17°32' 18"E 9.86' \ � 6890 % N7'q°1q,566 2A, -N74 ° 19'54 "W i 12.00' '\ ° 9'5 95.41 I / q, 1 � z 61 vM 1 ° - o m 1 4° l q 5A„� \ N b� pp, R=1533.00' L=8.54'- ' A=0°19,09"-N74°00'45"W(R) R=1600.00' --L=8.54' A=0°18'20" ` I `N74°01 '34"W(R) CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C 1 135.00' 35.76' A=150 10'41 " C2 209.00' 55.37' A=15° 10'41 " C3 196.00' 51.92' A=150 10'41 " C4 200.00' 10.67' A=3°03'20" C5 200.00' 16.16' A=4037'38" C6 1 15.00' 34.58' A=17013'36" C7 18. 00' 28.27' A=90°00'00" C8 18. 00' 28.27' A=90°00'00" C9 18. 00' 25.09' A=79°52'31 " CIO 18. 00' 7.64' A=24° 19'29" CII 1 15.00' 22.28' A=1 1 °O6'02" C 12 830.00' 22.98' A=1 °35' 1 1 " CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C 13 830.00' 12. 00' A=0049'43" C 14 55.00' 4.68' A=4052'29" C 15 55.00' 107.10' A= 111'34'35" C 16 55.00' 24.07' A=25°04'35" C 17 55.00' 19.39' A=20° 12'02" C 18 55.00' 58.96' A=61 °25'29" C19 115.00' 56.30' A=28°03'0I" C20 85.00' 165.53' A= 111'34'35" rC21 200.00' 5.49' A=1 °34' 18" RADIAL DATA TABLE - BEARING RADIUS (R)1 N59009' 13"W 135.00' (R)2 N62056'38"W 209.00' (R)3 N 19°06'36"E 200.00' (R)4 N55014'06"W 1 15.00, (R)5 N22009'56"E 200.00' (R)6 N47023'07"W 55.00' (R)7 N2701 I '05"W 55.00' (R)8 N2701 I '05"W 1 15.00, GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 NnTF.q: SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS. SEE SHEET 4 FOR MONUMENT NOTES. SEE SHEET 1 I FOR EXISTING EASEMENTS. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE _ COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS titi _ INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _ KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 h �R=1600.00' M4 I -- 8.46' 4=42012'02_ � _ M3 L-S97.IS' p=21°23'02 _ _N66°12�107.90' _ 00 r-N30°19'28"E(RJ =429 YNEZ ROAD d=1 ° S6 R = 1655.00' titi, 4 S2'16 �N31°54'03"E(R)l R-g R=o668 00 L =377 S l `/ d L o �O �N33°35' 1 1 "E(R) R= 525.00' I N34 113.8 8 4=12°S8111" 3 IS43 - �N26°20'04"E(R) 13.87' - - - � L=44 ��T ,qC � R-1660.00' rN23°47'S3"E(RJ 12.00'- 80' - C 17 i - i LS 4=1°32-79„ �i R=8S0 00 - L=73.49' 6=2032'77" - L6 12.00'- 1 (R) I` a L=48.39, i� Y=34.97=C16 ,��C 12 3 IS'43„ i 4-3043'26" i �-33.13:.1 � C83 � -C11 - L2 o (R)2J =3031'41"i 0 1 L(R)3 (R)4J J L(R)5 `(R)6 ,� w 113 �, � i 1 2 i h. M m W_ Lu 2,980 SQ. FT. Lo 0 3,847 SQ. FT. SEE DETAIL "J" co 0 ~ rk `� 112 �, ' M N O Ill- iQ � _c� THIS SHEET w M O^ 0 14,599SQ. FT. ^ oLo� _____ z��� , of = J `� o LOT A z , _ _-lo.so' 103.50' I T o = M 5,643 SQ. FT. �. �44.00' �- _ 64.60' L0 44 _ _ 53.80'- _�i z 12.00'- N720°027'42"W 108.6 1- (� N46038-4 I W(R) R = 100.00'7 G�_ - - - w L _ - 39.43' 'i w a0 _ T N42°35' 10"E(R) R=68.00`1 i ° o �, 1 BIti� 104 i i N72 27'42"W o0 o N o - o ,o i d 1 j _ ASS°4221 "w I C4- i I �'L4 5 00 0 00 2 0 '� O \o o 10 �IFIEL Q30' � -C3 i -C6 2,770 SQ. Fr. c6 � SQ. Fr. z 3,288 SQ. FT. Q w t� ui ,A 4222 D DRI UN��i �N66°08'46"E(R) Z ° - V .4 30 RIVE (R)�� ,`sv i��! - 64.16' _� �, N72�4 00 "W 163-93' 55.77 \ o a 44.00' i 50.75 'i -� L (R)8 , _ _ -C 14 69.18' Z C� I\ �� iREET, o -Cj� / �� j/� �N72°55'45"E(R) - 7 00 0 8 I C� C1 6 ^ o 3,103 SQ. Fr. O ►-] 6Q00, NSS°4221 "W M `L/ U` 3,372 0 * 2,640 0 6 - N 6 SEE DETAIL "J" 411.02' 3�� SQ. Fr. - SQ. FT. r., +� THIS SHEET 46 0 47 , io l 60.00, ,� I ` z z 0 2,880SQ. FT. co, / �i 15.04' _-- ----- ��---1 / 0.40' i _ \ 14244.O.16' t 52.70' I I , o o / 12 52 00 /� 549 66' - 44.00'2.20' 55.24'- 2 y M �; M 3,120 SQ. FT. --N72°27'42"14890__60oo, __ -Lr i oo IVS54221"wla i l obo - - 1 C) M �\ o OO CN O M ^ O = rr 48 /boo INS 60.00 65' o 0 1� 9 10 2,640 SQ. FT. d o S 4�2 a 11 'o 3,373 SQ. FT. LOT AC I l= rr l 1 w o "' 35' 30' 2,980 SQ. FT. Z 2,640 SQ. Fr. z SEE SHEET 11. 51 0 6p 004 ~ l 2,640 SQ. FT. d 'Lu co _� 44.00' -� - 57.20' � 67' /V`Ss°4221" , l� I = Lu Mo {� 49.66' 44.94' �j 48.74' ,.'i 0 57.18' 'i - 80' �l � 60 i. h I,`'11 ' ' - N72027'42' W 150.86' 49 IIVS °42 �' _ 0 w 14 3, 060 SQ. Fr. / / ) S 2I " IN i 0 N 12 - _ 13 o0 2, 983 SQ. FT. o cy)0 2,696 M _ o SEE DETAIL "J" I i J/ rj0 o J a � 3,431 SQ. FT. o 6 SQ. FT. 'O N � THIS SHEET /' 2,820 SQ. FT. �' z o 10 z VS 2`Ii ,14426.6-` L 50.70 398 S2, 600p, 57.18' 44.94' 6I - - w -_----4.00'=54.-69' J- w 5- oo N72°27'42"W 152.82- - I I SEE DETAIL "G" w w SHEET 12 ry w �0 N 1 � 10 W Z 17 oM 16 00 15 �� N I 10 r" 2,640 O '� 3,340 SQ. FT. F 0 3,248 SQ. FT. z Z LOT Y = �, ' o z SQ. FT. 10 56.65' 44.00' + i `- I _ 44.00' - - N72 207'42"W 154.78' 1Lu w 20 �_ 19 0 18 M 3,136 SQ. Fr. 30' - -I'- 30' oo N 2,640 o N _ o SEE DETAIL "J" 60' � 3,570 SQ. FT. oo 0 SQ. FT. �_ N 1 ° THIS SHEET z � - 44.00' �. 53.24' 1, 59.50' - i 148.00' I _ = N72027'42"W 156.74' _ - ' 23 22 LINE DATA TABLE - BEARING LENGTH L I N250 14' 52"W 20.43' L2 N660 09' 51 "W 25.04' L3 N260 05' 14"E 21.02' L4 N340 17' 39"E 13.45' L5 N550 42' 21 "W 24.00' L6 N660 12' 07"W 28.94' L7 N770 03' 42" E 61.46' RADIAL DATA TABLE - BEARING RADIUS (R)1 N30021'44"E 850.00' (R)2 N33037'27"E 850.00' (R)3 N29054'O 1 "E 538.00' (R)4 N26022'20"E 1673.00' (R)5 N26005'2 I "E 1673.00' (R) 6 N24 °40'34 "E 1673.00' (R)7 N44047'30"W 124.00' (R) 8 N63 °08'41 "E 68.00' SHEET 10 OF 12 SHEETS CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C 1 15.00, 19.18' A=73° 14'39" C2 124.00' 23.62' A=10054'51 " C3 100.00' 15.81' A=9°03'40" C4 68.00' 9.84' A=8017'31 " C5 68.00' 24.40' A=20°33'31 " C6 68.00' 3.56' A=3°00'05" C7 68.00' 86.93' A=73° 14'39" C8 1673.00' 74.06' A=2 °32' 1 I" C9 2.00' 3.14' A=90°00'00" CIO 2.00' 3.14' A=90°00'00" C 11 1673.00' 24.54' A=0°50'25" C 12 1673.00' 8.26' A=0° 16'59" C 13 1673.00' 41.26' A=1 °24'47" C 14 68.00' 8.05' A=6046'59" C 15 68.00' 41.08' A=34°36'33" C 16 538.00' 68.10' A=7° 15'07" C 17 525.00' 66.45' A=7° 15'07" C 18 38.00' 48.58' A=73° 14'39" I- - ���C97°32o18"E 1.00' I N72 27'42"W 16.00' N p0 l0 ►0 SIN 1 to o� �Iz N72°27'42"016.00'' ' CIo - - -N 17°32' 18"E 1.00' L DETAIL "J" NOT TO SCALE SEE SHEET 9 LINE DATA TABLE LINE DATA TABLE - BEARING LENGTH - BEARING LENGTH L 1 N400 38' 57"W 36.94' L 12 N560 06' 59"E 148.97' L2 N880 08' 10"E 31.14' L 13 N290 2700"W 63.2 1' L3 N450 35' 50'E 1 1.30' L 14 N 100 1707"W 13.91' L4 N020 38' 43"E 31.36' L 15 N490 29' 42"E 124.18' L5 N460 41' 57W 60.34' L 16 N450 35' 50"E 88.78' L6 N790 45' 19"E 41.16' L 17 N500 53' 07"W 36.2 1' L7 N540 16' 17W 36.14' L 18 N290 1738"E 39.00' L8 N710 1 I' 35"E 64.06' L 19 N600 03' 06"E 33.41' L9 N 180 48' 25"W 20.00' L20 N270 1 1 ' 05"W 30.00' L 10 N71 ° 1 1 ' 35"E 64.06' L21 N270 1 1 ' 05"W 30.00' L 1 I N540 16' 17W 47.97' L22 N270 1 1' 05"W 60.00' LINE DATA TABLE - BEARING LENGTH L23 N590 00' 00"E 30.00' L24 N590 00' 00"E 30.00' L25 N590 00' 00"E 60.00' L26 N770 03' 42"E 61.46' L27 N400 30' 18"W 33.00' L28 N400 30' 18"W 33.00' L29 N400 39' 04"W 30.00' L30 N500 28' 54"E 60.00' L31 N500 28' 54"E 30.00' L32 N500 28' 54"E 30.00' IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C23 55.00' 107.10' A=1 11 °34'35" C24 55.00' 63.64' 4=66° 17'58" C25 55.00' 43.46' A=45° 16'37" C26 85.00' 165.53' A=1 1 1 °34'35" C27 85.00' 67.17' A=45° 16'37" C28 85.00' 98.36' A=66° 17'58" C29 38.00' 23.45' A=35°2129" C30 38.00' 25.13' A=37°53' 10" C31 68.00' 86.93' A=73°14'39" 2� o b lli0 b`6' N� i i I-N59°00'00"E R ° coo co', _, � 0 ao L=44.67 °4221 �, q, 3 4 _ () N70 47'S3"W 13.88'� J 00 J 'I i d- I5°03'24" N55 0.40'- ' Z ►-i r °� L=30l. N40038-57"W Z Z - �, i R- 45 4=9°38'S7" \��. , �. / jj�1�►��•+,�' 411.02 0 LOT AB _ L23-1790.00' L=319.95' p_ ° 77.07' - - , Cil/ 2 W �-+ 0.416 ACRES G`I� h I R=18 -70 14'28" - 0 23'- L 14- L 1 wt N55°42 41 62 w O� �j o N25° 14'52"W 29.99'- N66° 12'07"W 28.94'�� - i G�0 __----N26°20'04"E(R) PCC--\ N33°35' 1 I "E(R) PRC C7 -N30° 19'28"E(R) PRC \ C6 - G ;� N66°09'51 "W--" -N67049'08"W 33.22' - HEIRLOOM DRIVE _ / 8 , 2s.o4' - 9,225 SQ. FT. ROAD _ .- C5 N25014'52"W _-N65°53'36"E R _ YNE Z ' 20.43' (J "PRIVATE STREET' � i i - � v 12059'58 � � � � R=1655.00'-N43°19'26"E(R) O0 37 5.48' �- ° 58,11„ it i LOT AC 40 ACRES o ��i LN65°42'54"E(R) L-543.48' 4- ° L=1027.40' p=35034'08" ° o L= =12 i i i , L_377.58 N30021'44"E(R) PRCJ i "OPEN SPACE" o a, "-N67°49'S3"W 28.01' 18 48'SS" N47 04'41 "E(RJ� C 19 - J l °� o R 1668'00' L=542.63' - ° -L4 �i' -C20� N43°19'S5"ERR 1668.00, N33 37N260 2 0"E _ L= 3803 N26°22'20"E(R) PCC-1 ,' -p-38°38'06" 2 o 0 4-18 38 21" L2 () - _N72°55'45"E R 4' N47°04'33"E(RJJ i -L3� C3� �� 'N88°08' 10"E 18.68' _ ( J N02038'43"E 18.19'-' ��� -C4 �`� iN21001'36"W 9.53' 30.14" � i0� - � , L=41.08' N45 35'50"E 12.06' N64014'49"W 9.79'- ��(, ' � w LOT AE � 3p' - � C2� ,� � p=34036'33" i N59°35'31 "E(R) PRC �N59°35'31 "E(RJ PRC `�' N - 9,226 SQ. FT. "PRIVATE STREET' 1"W 41 1 C29�; i ° N a 'O o� o R=170.00' S5°A2'2 3p' 31.32'- \/ L=18.50' p=0 35'31 " K N oLlr) N � N „W 41 �• -C30 SHEET 11 OF 12 SHEETS CURVE DATA TABLE - RADIUS LENGTH DELTA C 1 59.00' 77.5 1' A=75° 16' 18" C2 59.00' 77.5 1' A=75° 16' 18" C3 203.00' 13.81' A=3°53'52" C4 137.00' 9.32' A=3°53'52" C5 850.00' 48.39' A=3°15'43" C6 863.00' 49.13' A=3°15'43" C7 525.00' 66.45' A=7°15'07" C8 538.00' 68.10' A=7° 15'07" C9 1673.00' 74.06' A=2032' 1 1 " CIO 1660.00' 73.49' A=2°32' 1 I" C 11 135.00' 35.76' A=15° 10'41 " C 12 148.00' 39.2 1' A=15° 10'41 " C 13 196.00' 51.92' A=15° 10'41 " C 14 209.00' 55.37' A=15010'41 " C 15 32.50' 30.93' A=54°32'08" C 16 12.50' 1 1.90' A=54032'08" C 17 230.00' 60.44' A=15°03'24" C 18 200.00' 52.56' A=15003'24" C 19 1655.00' 108.44' A=3°45' 15" C20 170.00' 11.57' A=3°53'52" C21 38.00' 48.58' A=73° 14'39" LL22r38.00' 63.22' A=95019'34" "OPEN SPACE" I ` - 20 325.31' p=700 4'28" 36.89'- ' �g Q N35°44'03"W(RJ� Y /I 'L24 � - -_.- 121.97' 82.03' ; m o .9 l R=18so. LOT AF N40°38'57"W 204.00' - C 18 o d'o �,1 M2 PCC i .1 �n i �� 00' L=322.77' p=9°59'40" 49.91 N40°38'57"W C17 - N35°44'03"W R - i�i -N59°I5' A 0'2 L=317 56' p=9°38'S7" "� \ (J i � `�-L=1 1.15' p=0°20'43" _ �. .� 65,391 SQ. FT. � \\ 1 �i (J N55°22'39"W R ' ?-N40°38'S7"W 9.97' �l 2 \ o C 1 l� N59°09' 13"W(R) PCC o � i �N59°20'43"E R () PRIVATE STREET ,� •�,, N59 09' 13"W R PRC o 0p0 � i -`-N67032'38"W 13.74' o C2 G� Z-N25055' 15"W(R) i/ �� �, ° w Cl -4 N LN35°44'03"W(R) � - - 0 18.37'_ G�i �o "' O N ° w N40°38'S7"W�cp --N55°42'21 "W 60.00' „W 398 52 NO 1 °44'42"E ? "�A M2 w M2 \ �N62 11'33"W(R) 30.00' .o 55°42'21 �, �i�6 -N61 °07'53"W 5.00' 0 0.679 ACRES m - ; -N34° 17'39"E 45.22' N LOT Y o L-o- '% N62° 10'23"W(RJ-` i _ ° o LOT W "OPEN SPACE" �. - i-N40°39'04"W 22.24' 0.857 ACRES ° c, \� ` L=20.09' p=4 1 1' l 2" Q. 22.50'� ' r w I r "OPEN SPACE" N40 39'05"W 48.80'- �Q \ I N34017'39"E 29.34'� 4 N49°20'55"E 17.90'- : N66°21'35"W(R)- - L13 � N40°38'S7'W 15.00'-�N38°29'10"W N40°38'S7"W z N49°20'S6"E 15. 0'- � o s U �� .-60.04' 120.00' o. _ _ - - �. N36054'02"W o 91.17' 328.83' L5 N40°39'04"W t<`�� 0.441 ACRES ° M - N40039'04"W 420.00' - ' 120.00' .o 2� o0 o�� 705.23' "OPEN SPACE" N50 28'54"E 36.56'-: Nt o U'- 6, - 1 18.93' ,1 0 CC) °� LOT AD i 77. ri o �o�`Ao, ``' N33° 03' - - N39031'06"W 162.02' -� �, N C0• ° 6 0l� 7753"W A N 0- o ° \�99 `sr "� - N27° 1 1 '05"W(RJ- ;q so\ U U � � .� 9 \ s .2 v'- sr° °� o ; � I n 1 10 01 ° 0 00 o °2 Z �N69 18' 15"E(RJ oo °moo N 6 a Ci�� iN �/ I - -N2701 1 '05"W(R) o ° 4�� Q s�8,, `�. r L - 90.34' ^ z `� N50053'07"W 36.2 1'-- �' v o h h U r� 9�° ���� 418°49'21' 9.38'- - ��. �^ ^ z -G`L� `� a Q 150.70' - - - G ^�' `rl ' �0�,, �ELROS - - N39°37'06"W 194.32' - - N40039'04"W 514.30' - - r� N60040'06"E 19.12' E �I DRIVE _ l0°14'03" _ o� ° L31- � � o _ - N40039'04"W 514.60' - - � � i� � °,�� p G � � �- L=137.53' A= - n0. t0 ri �l o. 'o�p SEE DETAIL "K" N39 31 '06"W 194.62' , , N - �� , = '36.12' 1 50,663 SQ. FT. R=800.00' L 17- b 0-LOT AH L=142.89' A=10°14'03' _ ''b N25°40'34"E R 1� q6 i 1' °� � SHEET 12 L32` 7� n-N40°39'04'W 30.00' "PRIVATE STREET' F- (J ,b$' 9' / N39°37'06"W 150.70' = N40°39'04"W 469.60' R=830.00' 03„ `-N50°53'07"W 36.21' 00 �'� 'L. o s' 'rN80°40'48"E(R) LOT AJ N 14°55'04"W 16.10,-- /i i ° \ `-N65040'05"W 16.55' L=148.25' p=10°14' $0`L• Oq 1�°l\G q Qo, �rL9 44,621 SQ. FT. w o0 N50022'55"W 12.86'- �� �0. g , �1 N 3 s09,"PRIVATE STREET' (, ° a oW LOT Al N62043'25"W 19.68'- \ i i �10° 00 `L q� a o 9,000 SQ. FT. N72 23'23"W 15.82'- \ i i D�1 °31 3 ; �1 � PRIVATE STREET N29005'39"E(R)-3`L i N29°17'38"E(RJ� 2 Sb 3°3 2 3 4 � _ � � SEE DETAIL "E" LOT AC ,1q p%� 50' o _ o N ° TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE 0.640 ACRES Al" o ^ a SHEET 12 °15 02' 3 I r o o C z DEDICATED HEREON 2.497 ACRES. "OPEN SPACE" 51, p=20 ��� -C 15 - 151.11' I I M�0' cam, _ _ _ L=2g3 50" cP bb, ��� L7=26795, 4=31°1 N40°39'04"W I - Z `�' N40°39'04"W505.31' R=802-083 87; �_4760 31 p;33° 9021,20 N80°40'48"E(RJ , / R, 29 9 52" 142.12' N' I-� ° 496.31' , ' ` , LR= L 13 R=-N29017'38"E(R) L=23.17' d=2 20'16' �� i �� , - - N40 39'04"W 731.53' a, _ _ 811.00 L= g,81' g5 N78°20'32"E(R �28�� L;2892_ - 11, ;' I i M �_ _ h._ L=158.71'=10°41'53 �N38°39'03"E(RJ 4-31°79'S2" 11' N40°39'04"W731.53' -� R__889.00' `` N56°O6'59"E GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET R 3 4=28° 0 40 80 160 568. 00, 5 9'36 " 1 l i 22' M 9° 5 4' 3 2"-. �40.80' 310.6p, - - 107.49' 624.04' - L=153.75' p= �N39°26'24"E(R) 4=31°79'52" - - N40039'04"W 731.53' 2 3 4 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 37509 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THROUGH 3, INCLUSIVE, AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA15-1434, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542235 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC SEPTEMBER 2020 9.00 IN39031'06"W wI W col ono coLo I O I o O z z � R=2.00' R=2.00' „-L=3.14' L=3.14'- �� l �, �' A=90°00'00" A=90000'00" II_N39°31'06"W- 10.00' 7 1.00' N39°31 'O6"W 12' 12' -� 24 1 I n FTA ll PAJI ilJ Jl-F1LC %� 9.50 IN33°17S3"W .I w I N of W o- I R=2.00' I L=3.14'- R=2.00' A=90000'001, ` ` 7 / I--L=3.14' Imo' A=90°00'00" N33017'53"W 10.00' - I 1.00' N33077,53"w I 72' I I 24' DETAIL "D" NOT TO SCALE r I � LOT Al w; "PRIVATE STREET' 10 co oz 1 I w� N� 101131 W I o1 o � Q ol N Z N40039'04"W 10.68'- 151.12' - - -�`- 62.49' AB „oLOT 46.55' 46.55' -142.12' 93.10' - N40039'04"W 731.53'- �~ y DETAIL "E" NOT TO SCALE 1 i� J 00 N r 132 --10.68' N40°39'04"W ,` 505.31' , 60.05' - ti \ ` '12.73' LOT AC ,�� "OPEN SPACE" 496.31- y L_ J DETAIL "F" NOT TO SCALE I12 \ r _N55042'21 "W N5510 00 1.00' \\ i� R=2.00' '-L=3.14' A=90°00'00" R=2.00' L=3.14'- d=90°00'00" z\ 'o O` \ m\ 0�2'21„W i \ N55 9 00"- I I nFTA ll II�II uwjuwriwaxi� NN z Z oo, LOT AB / �N� "OPEN SPACE" / so 4 h 26> sr l -8.42' 1 1 DETAIL X" NOT TO SCALE F-LO-TAC- "OPEN SPACE" 3.64' - \ 9-00N55°42 21 i 1 B.00, I Z w y fi N55042'21 "W- \ 'A3.00' i I zjp- w 115 m LOT D nFTAll "H" IVVI IV Jl..f1LL z w 0 y m SHEET 12 OF 12 SHEETS -N55042'21 " 3.00' F \ �z \R z 33 31 R=3.00' \ A=90°00'00" \ N5515.001 VJ \\z I\ Z w \ \0 s 32 \ m \ �\ LOT W �\ "OPEN SPACE" N \ 1\ 0 \ R=3.00' \ o� L=4.71 '� \ A=90°00'00" ` , -N34° 17'39"E 12 00 0.50' �. 1 0- 4 00, 125 42'21 W 2 I �.� N55 15 -00 J n FTA ll "I" IVVI IV Jl�/'1LC Item No. 8 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 CALL TO ORDER at 9:02 PM: President Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 6. Approve Action Minutes of September 14, 2021 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of September 14, 2021. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 9:07 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: October 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution to Approve the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update (61h Cycle) and an Update to the Public Safety Element (Long Range Planning Project Number LR18-1620) PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND UPDATES TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR18-1620) AND APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM NO. 2021-01 TO THE GENERAL PLAN BACKGROUND: The original City of Temecula General Plan Housing Element was approved in 1993 and updated in 2002, 2010, and 2014, pursuant to the amendment cycle for local agencies under the jurisdiction of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). A comprehensive General Plan Update was adopted by the City Council on April 12, 2005, which included an update to the City's Public Safety Element, and a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) was prepared in association with the comprehensive General Plan Update. Upon the Housing Element's most recent update (2014), an Addendum to the City's General Plan FEIR was prepared. State Housing Element Law (California Government Code Sections 65580-65589) requires all cities and counties to update their Housing Elements at least every eight years to reflect the community's changing needs. This update covers the 2021-2029 planning period, pursuant to the sixth update cycle for jurisdictions within the SCAG region. In June 2019, the City entered into an agreement with De Novo Planning Group (De Novo) to assist in the development of the Housing Element update for the current cycle and prepare a targeted update to the City's Public Safety Element in accordance with State law. The consultant and the City have been working diligently to engage the public, prepare the updated Housing Element and Public Safety Element, and provide a public Draft Housing Element. The City is required to send the Draft Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review and comment. HCD has a maximum of 60 days to provide comments on the Administrative Draft. If HCD provides any comments that need to be addressed by the City, the City's consultant will revise the Housing Element and present the revised draft to the City Council for approval. The Housing Element will then be submitted to HCD for certification. For agencies under the jurisdiction of SCAG, the statutory deadline to adopt an updated Housing Element is October 15, 2021. If a local government fails to adopt is Housing Element within 120 days of the statutory due date (February 12, 2022), the local government will be required to update the Housing Element every four years until it adopts two consecutive revisions by the applicable due date. On September 15, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the updated Housing Element and Public Safety Element. There were three written comments and eight public speakers. Public speakers spoke on a wide variety of issues, including the need for affordable/workforce housing, concerns regarding water, traffic, growth, and housing for senior citizens. The Planning Commission also recommended that staff incorporate two additional policies based on public feedback from public outreach efforts. One policy would be for the exploration of a housing trust with the Western Riverside County Council of Governments (WRCOG). The second policy addition would be to explore a voluntary partnership to solicit funds from companies who may need workforce housing for employees, possibly in cooperation with a nonprofit. Analysis The purpose of a General Plan Housing Element is to address local and regional housing needs. A Housing Element is required to: • Provide housing opportunities to all income segments of the population; • Provide adequate sites to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA); • Remove governmental constraints in maintaining and developing housing; • Conserve and improve the existing housing stock; • Implement statutes under State Housing Law; • Provide equal access to housing opportunities; • Affirmatively furthering fair housing, and • Preserve at -risk housing units. In accordance with State law, staff conducted a housing needs assessment which included the following components: An analysis and update of Temecula's demographic, household, and housing characteristics; • An analysis and update of Temecula's potential constraints; • An evaluation of land and resources to address housing needs; • An evaluation of accomplishments under the adopted Housing Element; and • A housing plan to address the City's identified housing needs. Regional Housing Needs Assessment (Proposed Housing Element, 2021-2029) The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) is a minimum projection of additional housing units needed to accommodate projected household growth of all income levels by the end of the Housing Element's statutory planning period. The RHNA is developed by Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and allocated to cities and counties in the region. Historically, Temecula has generated thousands of units (including many that were naturally more affordable) over the past 30 years, often to the benefit of communities that have not produced adequate units (at all income levels) in major urban centers. In September 2019, the City advocated for a revision to the proposed methodology based on various concerns related to infrastructure and consistency with various regional plans and statewide goals. Many jurisdictions, like the City of Temecula, advocated for a change to the RHNA allocation, based on various similar concerns. At that time, the City projected that it would be assigned a RHNA allocation between 6,393-11,231 units. Unexpectedly, SCAG voted to reverse a historical trend of placing higher RHNA allocations on suburban/inland communities and increased the responsibility of communities near major employment/urban centers to provide units. A substantially lower RHNA allocation was provided to the City of Temecula, as described below. The Regional Housing Needs Allocation was originally anticipated to be adopted in October of 2020. The Final RHNA allocation was not adopted until March 4, 2021 and was not adopted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) until March 22, 2021, a six-month delay. Upon completion, SCAG distributed the sixth cycle RHNA for all local agencies under its jurisdiction. RHNA includes targets for Extremely Low, Very Low, Moderate, and Above Moderate Income categories. The City of Temecula needed to plan for 4,193 new housing units for people working in our community in the next eight years. Temecula's 2021- 2029 allocation is distributed among the five standard income categories shown below. Income Level Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) % of Total Allocation (Rounded) Extremely Low 679 Units 16% Very Low 680 Units 16% Low 801 Units 19% Moderate 778 Units 19% Above Moderate 1,255 Units 30% Total RHNA 4,193 Units 100% State law requires the City to provide enough suitable sites with appropriate zoning and density to accommodate the affordable housing needs for of all income levels, listed above. Any units constructed between July 1, 2021 and the adoption of the Housing Element will be credited to the 6th Cycle RHNA allocation. 511 Cycle Progress (Current Housing Element, 2014-2021) The City's 5th Cycle Housing Element addresses housing needs for the City from 2014 through 2021. During the 5th Cycle, the City was required to accommodate 1,494 housing units under the previous RHNA allocation. The private market then constructs housing units based on market considerations. The market exceeded the total RHNA allocation goal, with 1,895 housing units being built or under construction. This equates to 127% of the City's Total 5th Cycle RHNA. However, while the market was successful in having housing built at the above -moderate income level, the market did not construct all units at the lower income levels, which is an issue that most jurisdictions face in California. Three deed restricted workforce/affordable projects (Arrive at Rancho Highlands, Las Haciendas, and Vine Creek) were approved during the 5th Cycle RHNA but are expected to be constructed in the next couple of years, during the 6th Cycle RHNA. Suitable Sites and Capacity An important component of the Temecula Housing Element is the identification of sites for future housing development. Equally important is an evaluation of the adequacy of this site inventory in accommodating the City's share of regional housing growth. As part of this Housing Element update, the City conducted a parcel -by -parcel analysis of vacant residential sites based on data obtained from the City's geographic information system (GIS). The vacant land inventory for the City of Temecula includes an estimated development capacity for the identified vacant parcels. Appendix A of the Housing Element summarizes the available housing unit capacity based on vacant residential sites. Residential capacity for each vacant parcel is based on the current zoning for each parcel. Each parcel is assumed to develop at 75%-85% of its maximum capacity, which allows for setbacks, landscaping, right-of-way dedications, and other non-residential uses. The City has found that it has adequate capacity to accommodate its RHNA allocation at all income levels. The proposed Housing Element does not include any zone changes or General Plan amendments to accommodate additional units. Currently, the City has a surplus of 5,313 units above the 4,193 units already mandated by the RHNA allocation. Future Municipal Code Amendments Upon certification of the Housing Element Update by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), at least six Zoning Code Amendments will be required to ensure that the Temecula Municipal Code complies with State Housing Law. City staff will work with the City Attorney's office to draft the necessary amendments, which will be brought before the Planning Commission and City Council at future hearing dates. First, the City will update the Zoning Code to comply with Government Code Sections 65660 through 65668 in relation to low barrier navigation centers. A low barrier navigation center is a Housing First, low -barrier, service enriched shelter focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides temporary living facilities while case manager connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter and housing. The City's Municipal Code does not prohibit low barrier navigation centers currently, but State law requires explicit language that permits low barrier navigations by right in certain zones. Second, the City will need to develop Municipal Code language for agricultural worker housing, consistent with Health and Safety Code Section 17021.8. Third, the City will need to develop Municipal Code language for employee housing, consistent with State law. Fourth, the City will need to update the Municipal Code to comply with a numerous State laws, including SB 35, SB 330, Government Code Section 65905.5, 65913.4, 65940, 65941.1, 65950 and 66300 related to streamlined housing reviews and affordable housing projects. Staff is currently working on these changes and will bring these changes forward at a future hearing date. Fifth, the City will need to update the Municipal Code to comply with AB 139, which outlines requirements for emergency shelter parking. Staff is currently working on these changes and will bring these changes forward at a future hearing date. Finally, the City will need to amend Planning Development Overlay Zone 2 and 7 to specifically allow Accessory Dwelling Units consistent with State law. Upon HCD's review of the City of Temecula's updated Housing Element, it is possible that additional amendments will be identified to comply with State Housing Law. Outreach The City conducted significant outreach, even amongst a challenging environment related to COVID-19 restrictions. The City's outreach included: • A dedicated website, TemeculaCA.gov/housing • A dedicated email list for interested parties • A dedicated Housing Element brand/presence on social media, "#housethis? " • 33,000 newsletter mailers that included a Housing Element article • 63,000 social media impressions • Over 860 survey respondents, which included printed copies for seniors/constituents without access to a computer • A virtual workshop, conducted in English and Spanish, and made available online throughout the duration of the public outreach process • An in -person workshop, conducted in English, with live Spanish translation available • Virtual meetings with real estate groups • Over 10,800 direct emails sent, with thousands of additional emails sent by partners at the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, local real estate organizations, religious institutions, and nonprofits • Direct emails sent to existing affordable housing developments within the City and prospective affordable housing developers • Flyers in foods banks, coffee shops, and the public libraries • Surveys and flyers at the Temecula Help Center (which serves those constituents who are at risk of becoming homeless or are already homeless) • Advertisements and educational materials shared on Channel 3 (local broadcast) and the City's YouTube channel Public Safety Element Changes are proposed for the City's Public Safety Element to comply with State law. These changes include references to the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), County of Riverside Multi jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, additional background information regarding fire hazards, as well as revisions to existing policies and additional policies to comply with State law. An analysis, compliant with Senate Bill 99, was also completed to identify residential development in hazard areas and evaluate access to emergency evacuation routes. Further revisions and updates to the Public Safety Element are anticipated with the City's future comprehensive General Plan Update. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are currently programmed for the Community Development Department to adopt and implement the 2021-2029 Housing Element and Public Safety Element updates. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. 2021-2029 Housing Element Update 3. 2021-2029 Housing Element Update (Appendices) 4. Updates to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan 5. General Plan Addendum 2021-01 6. Senate Bill 99 Analysis 7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-28 8. Public Correspondence 9. Notice of Public Hearing RESOLUTION NO. 2021 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT AND UPDATES TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR18-1620) AND APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM NO. 2021-01 TO THE GENERAL PLAN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine, and declare that: A. The City of Temecula adopted its first Housing Element (Second Cycle) on November 9, 1993. B. The City of Temecula first amended its Housing Element (Third Cycle) on October 8, 2002. C. The City of Temecula adopted a Comprehensive Update of its General Plan on April 12, 2005. D. The City of Temecula amended its Housing Element (Fourth Cycle) on July 27, 2010. E. The City of Temecula amended its Housing Element (Fifth Cycle) on January, 2014. F. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) completed the Sixth Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) on March 4, 2021, with a minor amendment adopted on July 1, 2021. G. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) approved the RHNA allocation on March 22, 2021. H. Government Code Section 65588 establishes October 15, 2021, as the due date for cities located in the SCAG region to submit their 2021-2029 Housing Element Update to the State. I. The City of Temecula must adopt its 2021-2029 Housing Element within 120 days of the above -referenced due date in order to remain on an eight year planning cycle. J. The Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element includes an analysis of potential sites that indicates that the City of Temecula has adequate development capacity under existing zoning designations to meet its RHNA of 4,139 total units and related affordable housing needs for lower and moderate income households. K. On August 17, 2021, the Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element was released to the community for public comment and review including to groups that represent lower income and special needs populations in Temecula; and L. On August 17, 2021, the City hosted a community open house to introduce the Draft Housing Element and solicit public feedback on the Housing Plan. M. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, codified at Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR § 15000 et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the adoption of the 2021-2029 Housing Element and the update to the Public Safety Element (the Project); and N. This Housing Element Update and Update to the Public Safety Element was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by law. O. The Planning Commission considered the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and Update to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan and environmental review on September 15, 2021 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. P. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2021-28 recommending that the City Council adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update, Update to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, and EIR Addendum No. 2021-01 to the General Plan, based upon the findings set forth hereunder. Q. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the 2021-2029 Housing Element (Sixth Cycle), and Update to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. R. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council approved the 2021-2029 Housing Element (Sixth Cycle), and Update to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, Long Range Planning Project No. LR18-1620 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. S. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in adopting the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and update to the Public Safety Element hereby finds, determines and declares that: General Plan Amendment A. The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and Minor Updates to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update has been designed to be consistent with State Housing Law, the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for local agencies under jurisdiction of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and to be internally consistent with the other elements of the Temecula General Plan with implementation of the identified programs. The updates to the Public Safety Element are being updated to comply with State law. B. The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and Minor Updates to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan will not have a significant impact on the character of the built environment; The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update is compatible with the nature, condition and development of existing uses, buildings and structures and will not adversely affect the existing or planned uses, buildings, or structures. The Housing Element Update contains the goals, policies, and programs that will help guide the production of future housing within the City, in concert with other elements of the General Plan. The Housing Element Update will provide flexibility and opportunity in the development of residential uses to meet the needs of all economic segments of the community within the City. The specific programs of the Housing Element Update will provide opportunity for affordable housing through the identification of appropriate sites and density, provisions for density bonus law, provisions for transitional, supportive, and employee housing, as well as establishment of development standards for emergency shelters. The Housing Element and the City's current General Plan have adequate capacity to accommodate all units. Furthermore, the proposed updates to the Public Safety Element will update the Public Safety Element to comply with State law. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the General Plan FEIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed updates to the General Plan Housing Element and Public Safety Element do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required. C. The nature of the proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and Minor Updates to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update will promote the health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the City and its residents through the goals, policies, and implementation programs geared towards ensuring adequate housing for all income levels in the community. The proposed Housing Element Update complies with all statutory requirements and is internally consistent with the other elements of the General Plan with implementation of the identified programs. The proposed Housing Element will not expose people to an increased risk of negative health or public safety impacts and potential impacts related to the health, safety and general welfare of the community were analyzed in the environmental review and determined to be less than significant as a result of this project. The Housing Element and the City's current General Plan have adequate capacity to accommodate all units. Furthermore, the updates to the Public Safety Element will further enhance safety, in compliance with State law. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the General Plan FEIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed updates to the General Plan Housing Element and Public Safety Element do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required. Section 3. Further Findings. The Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element has been prepared to meet the requirements of State law and local housing objectives, and is consistent with the other elements of the current Temecula General Plan. Section 4. Environmental Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommendation for approval of the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and Minor Updates to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, Long Range Planning Project No. LR18-1620. A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff has reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the General Plan certified by the City Council on April 12, 2005 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003061041), including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Staff has also reviewed the Harveston Specific Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2019070974), Altair Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2014111029) and Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2013061012). B. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the General Plan FEIR (Addendum 2021-01) has been prepared which concludes that the proposed updates to the General Plan Housing Element and Public Safety Element do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. No new development is permitted under the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update where it is not currently permitted in the General Plan, and all new development analyzed in the Housing Element Update is in areas already designated for residential or mixed use. In addition, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced since the certification of the General Plan EIR. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required. C. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council herby adopts General Plan Addendum 2021-01 prepared for this project. Section 4. Adoption. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby adopts the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update, Updates to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan and General Plan Addendum 2021-01 in substantially the same form as attached here to as Exhibit "A„ PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 12th day of October, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 12th day of October, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT August 2021 UILY ui i ernecuia f, 41000 Main Street **! Jemecula, CA 92590 httpsl/temeculaca.ggv/ a 12--+*- _ _ • - mmm ���:� • �� K ,Yr -., n Al 1 { _ »..�.« .. �..,�....�- .:��-;;;sue-�--=���• � ,�;�; *+�� PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT PREPARED FOR: CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 PREPARED BY: DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 180 E Main Street Suite 108 Tustin, CA 92780 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT ORGANIZATION Part 1: Housing Plan Part 1 of the 2021-2029 Housing Element is the City's "Housing Plan", which includes the goals, policies, and programs the City will implement to address constraints and needs. The City's overarching objective is to ensure that decent, safe housing is available to all current and future residents at a cost that is within the reach of the diverse economic segments which comprise Temecula. Part 2: Background Report Part 2 of the 2021-2029 Housing Element is the "Background Report" which identifies the nature and extent of Temecula's housing needs, including those of special populations, potential housing resources (land and funds), potential constraints to housing production, and energy conservation opportunities. By examining the City's housings, resources, and constraints, the City can then determine a plan of action for providing adequate housing, as presented in Part 1: Housing Plan. In addition to identifying housing needs, the Background Report also presents information regarding the setting in which these needs occur. This information is instrumental in providing a better understanding of the community, which in turn is essential for the planning of future housing needs. Appendix A: Housing Sites Inventory The Housing Element must include an inventory of land suitable and available for residential development to meet the City's regional housing need by income level. Appendix B: Glossary The Housing Element includes, as Appendix B, a glossary of key terms and phrases. Appendix C: Public Engagement Summary As part of the Housing Element Update the process, the City hosted numerous opportunities for the community and key stakeholders to provide feedback on existing housing conditions, housing priorities, priority areas for new residential growth, and topics related to fair housing. Public engagement was facilitated in both English and Spanish to further engage the Temecula community. Public participation played an important role in the refinement of the City's housing goals and policies and in the development of new housing programs, as included in Part 1: Housing Plan. The public's input also helped to validate and expand upon the contextual information included in Part 2: Background Report. The City's efforts to engage the community in a meaningful and comprehensive way are summarized in Appendix C. Appendix D: 2017 Assessment of Fair Housing In 2017 the City of Temecula prepared an Assessment of Fair Housing. This Assessment provides the foundation and context for the City's Assessment of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, as included in Part 2 of the Housing Element. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT PART 1: HOUSING PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE This page intentionally left blank. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-2 I. INTRODUCTION The eight -year plan is the centerpiece of the 2021-2029 Housing Element for Temecula. The Housing Plan sets forth the City's goals, policies, and programs to address the identified housing needs. Housing programs included in this plan define the specific actions the City will take to achieve specific goals and policies. The City's overall strategy for addressing its housing needs has been defined according to the six goals: 1. Providing adequate housing sites; 2. Assisting in development of affordable and special needs housing; 3. Removing constraints to housing production; 4. Conserving and improving existing housing stock; 5. Affirmatively furthering fair housing; and 6. Promoting public participation. A. Goals and Policies Provide Adequate Housing Sites Goal 1 Provide a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social, and economic needs of existing and future residents of Temecula. Discussion The City provides for a mix of new housing opportunities by designating a range of residential densities and promoting creative design and development of vacant land and reuse of developed land. By providing for the construction of a range of housing, the needs of all sectors of the community can be met. Policy 1.1 Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient to accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of housing types in terms of cost, density, unit size, configuration, and type, and presents the opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing types. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-3 Policy 1.3 Require a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new developments around the village centers to enhance their pedestrian orientation and diversity. Policy 1.4 Support the use of innovative site planning and architectural design in residential development. Policy 1.5 Encourage the use of clustered development to preserve and enhance important environmental resources and open space, consistent with sustainability principles. Policy 1.6 Encourage the development of compatible mixed -use projects that promote and enhance the village concept, facilitate the efficient use of public facilities, support alternative transit options, and provide affordable housing alternatives by establishing a program of incentives for mixed -use projects. Policy 1.7 Where feasible, use City -owned or City -controlled land for affordable housing projects. Policy 1.8 To the extent feasible, make use of the tools available to the City to assemble land or sell land at a write -down for affordable housing. Policy 1.9 Maintain adequate capacity to accommodate the City's unmet Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for all income categories throughout the planning period. Policy 1.10 Allow by -right approval for housing developments proposed for non -vacant sites included in one previous housing element inventory and vacant sites included in two previous housing elements, provided that the proposed housing development consists of at least 20 percent lower income and affordable ` housing units. Assist in Development of Affordable and Special Needs Housing Goal Provide housing for people of different economic segments and with special needs. Discussion The City of Temecula works to provide a variety of affordable housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community. By coordinating with other government agencies and nonprofit organizations to access funding sources for affordable housing and to partner in the creative provision of affordable housing, the City CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-4 helps provide safe and affordable housing for all residents in the community. The City is also committed to ensuring that adequate housing opportunities are available for persons with special needs, such as the elderly, persons with disabilities, including persons with developmental disabilities, large families, single -parent households, and the homeless. Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population, and provide opportunities to meet Temecula's fair share of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate- income housing by promoting the City's program of density bonuses and incentives. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs groups. Policy 2.3 Encourage the use of nontraditional housing models, including single -room occupancy (SRO) or Efficiency Unit Housing structures and manufactured housing, to meet the needs of special groups for affordable housing, temporary shelter, and/or transitional housing. Policy 2.4 Pursue all available forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development and implementation of the City's housing programs. Policy 2.5 Require that all new affordable housing developments incorporate energy- and water -efficient appliances, amenities, and building materials to reduce overall housing -related costs for future low- and moderate -income households and families. olicy 2.6 Establish and maintain a City database to monitor trends in the economy and Temecula's demographics to be able to anticipate shifts in trends, while continuing to provide relevant affordable housing. Policy 2.7 Develop and coordinate multi -agency, regional, and cross - jurisdictional approaches to homelessness and special needs housing, including transitional housing. Remove Constraints to Housing Production Goal 3 Reduce and/or remove governmental and non- governmental constraints in the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-5 Discussion The City's goal is to reduce or remove constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing to ensure the provision of housing affordable to all members of the community. Governmental requirements for the development and rehabilitation of housing often add to the cost of the provision of affordable housing and may result in fewer opportunities for housing affordable to lower -income households. Although nongovernmental constraints like the cost of land, construction costs, and the availability of financing are primarily market - driven and generally outside direct government control, Temecula can influence and offset the negative impact of nongovernmental constraints through responsive programs and policies. Policy 3.1 Expedite processing procedures and fees for new construction or rehabilitation of housing. Policy 3.2 Consider mitigating development fees for projects that provide affordable senior housing, and special needs. Policy 3.3 Periodically review City development standards to ensure consistency with the General Plan and to ensure high -quality affordable housing. Policy 3.4 Monitor State and federal housing -related legislation, and update City plans, ordinances, and processes as appropriate to remove or reduce governmental constraints. Policy 3.5 Regularly identify and evaluate the impact of nongovernmental constraints on housing development and implement programs to reduce negative impacts. Conserve and Improve Existing Housing Stock Goal 4 Conserve the existing housing stock with an emphasis on affordable housing. Discussion Along with providing for new affordable housing opportunities, the City also has a goal to preserve existing affordable housing opportunities for residents. By providing incentives and programs to maintain both the affordability and the structural integrity of existing units, the City ensures that affordable housing opportunities are preserved as the housing stock ages. Policy 4.1 Monitor the number of affordable units eligible for conversion to market -rate units and continue the means to minimize the loss of these units. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-6 Policy 4.2 Develop programs directed at rehabilitating and preserving the integrity of existing housing stock for all income levels. Policy 4.3 Support the efforts of private and public entities in maintaining the affordability of units through implementation of energy conservation and weatherization programs. Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Goal Affirmatively further fair housing, providing equal housing opportunity for all residents in Temecula. Discussion In order to make provisions for the housing needs of all segments of the community, the City must affirmatively further fair housing and ensure that equal and fair housing opportunities are available to all residents. Policy 5.1 Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and insurance practices to purchase, sell, rent, and lease property. Policy 5.2 Support fair housing efforts to ensure that all income segments of the community have unrestricted access to appropriate housing. Policy 5.3 Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for persons with special needs, such as the elderly, persons with disabilities, including persons with developmental disabilities, large families, single -parent households, and the homeless. Policy 5.4 Encourage and consider supporting local private nonprofit groups that address the housing needs of the homeless and other disadvantaged groups. Policy 5.5 Prohibit discrimination in the sale or rental of housing based on age, familial status, race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics for all housing projects approved by the City. Policy 5.6 Encourage the equitable spatial distribution of affordable housing throughout the City, particularly where adequate support facilities exist (i.e. alternative transportation, jobs, etc.). Policy 5.7 Educate the public on lower -income and special needs housing through existing annual reports or other forms of media. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-7 Policy 5.8 Assist in affirmatively furthering and enforcing fair housing laws by providing support to organizations that provide outreach and education regarding fair housing rights, receive and investigate fair housing allegations, monitor compliance with fair housing laws, and refer possible violations to enforcing agencies. Policy 5.9 Accommodate persons with disabilities who seek reasonable waiver or modification of land use controls and/or development standards pursuant to procedures and criteria set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Promote Public Participation Goal Encourage collaboration between housing developers and neighborhood organizations on affordable housing projects and addressing neighborhood concerns. Discussion The promotion of public participation in the planning process is an important responsibility for local agencies. Residents and other stakeholders like the development community and neighborhood organizations are all influenced by the City's housing plans and programs and their input must be considered and reflected in the City's decision - making process. Policy 6.1 Use the public participation process to educate the public on lower -income and special needs housing through existing annual reports or other forms of media. Policy 6.2 Strengthen opportunities for participation in the approval process for all housing projects, including affordable housing. B. Housing Programs The goals and policies contained in the Housing Plan address Temecula's identified housing needs and are implemented through a series of housing programs. Housing programs include both programs currently in operation in the city and new programs that have been introduced to address the unmet housing needs, affirmatively further fair housing, and ensure that Temecula's housing goals, policies, and programs are aligned with federal and state requirements. This section provides a description of each housing program and future program goals, along with identifying the program funding sources, responsible agency, and time frame for implementation. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-8 Provide Adequate Housing Sites (Goal 1) A key element in satisfying the housing needs of all segments of the community is the provision of adequate sites for housing of all types, sizes, and prices. This is an important function in both zoning and General Plan designations. 1. Land Use Policy and Development Capacity The Land Use Element of the Temecula General Plan and the City's Development Code designates land within the city for a range of residential densities that support residential development suitable for all income levels. The City of Temecula received a RHNA of 4,193 units for the 2021- 2029 RHNA period. After credits for constructed units (27) and approved units (132) are taken into consideration, the City of Temecula has a remaining 2021-2029 RHNA of 4,034 units, including 1,327 extremely/very low-income, 702 low-income, 757 moderate -income and 1,249 above moderate -income units. The residential sites inventory consists of accessory dwelling units, vacant residential land exclusive of Specific Plan areas, and vacant residential land inside Specific Plan areas. Together, these resources have the capacity to accommodate at least 9,347 new units at all income levels. These sites can accommodate the remaining RHNA for all income levels through year 2029. The City will continue to maintain an inventory of available sites for residential development and will continue to make it available on the City's website; it will also be provided to prospective residential developers upon request. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will reglarly monitor the availability of sites zoned for Nresidential uses to ensure sufficient capacity exists to accommodate Temecula's Regional Housing Need Allocation at all income levels for the duration of the planning period. • The City will continue to maintain an inventory of sites suitable for residential development and provide that information online and to interested developers. • The City will encourage the reservation of land that is currently designated for multiple -family development by providing the multi -family sites inventory to multi -family housing developers to solicit development interest. The City will update the multi -family sites inventory at least once a year. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-9 The City will continue to allow residential mixed use to be permitted at a density of at least 30 units per acre to encourage the construction of multi -family housing by right. In addition, the City will continue to provide appropriate flexible development standards such as increased building height and shared parking opportunities for developments with minimum densities of 20 dwelling units per acre in the Zoning Ordinance. The City will continue to promote its Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) Zoning District, which is applicable to over 100 acres in the City and has resulted in the approval of multiple affordable housing projects during the prior planning period. Information related to the AHO will continue to be provided online and proactively to affordable housing developers working in and around the City of Temecula. As part of preapplication meetings (which are provided at no charge), the City will continue to educate the development community on the AHO and highlight the opportunities to develop affordable housing in the City of Temecula. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tlm efram e • Ongoing implementation and annual reporting throughout the planning period 2. Maintain Adequate Sites Throughout the Planning Period The City will monitor the consumption of residential acreage, including review of proposed General Plan amendments, Zoning map amendments, and development projects, to ensure an adequate inventory is available to meet the City's 2021-2029 RHNA obligations. The City will develop and implement a monitoring procedure pursuant to Government Code Section 65863 and will make the findings required by that code section if a site is proposed for development with fewer units or at a different income level than shown in the Housing Element. Should an approval of development result in a reduction of capacity below the residential capacity needed to accommodate the remaining need for lower income, moderate, or above CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-10 moderate income households, the City will identify and, if necessary, rezone sufficient sites within 180 days to accommodate the shortfall and ensure "no net loss" in capacity to accommodate the RHNA, consistent with State law. Any site rezoned will satisfy the adequate site requirements of Section 65583.2 and will be consistent with the City's obligation to affirmatively further fair housing. Eight -Year Objectives Review each housing approval on sites listed in the Housing Element and make findings required by Government Code Section 65863 if a site is proposed with fewer units or a different income level than shown in the Housing Element. If insufficient suitable sites remain at each income level, identify and, if necessary, rezone sufficient sites within 180 days. Identify additional sites that may be required to be upzoned to meet "no net loss" requirements for Housing Element adoption in 2025 (a mid -cycle review). Any site identified to be upzoned will satisfy the adequate site requirements of Section 65583.2 and will be consistent with the City's obligation to affirmatively further fair housing. • Report as required through the HCD annual reporting process. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources 'I• Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Ongoing implementation, at time of approval of a project on a site listed in the Housing Element, and annual reporting throughout the planning period 3. Public Property Conversion to Housing Program The City will maintain a list of surplus City -owned lands, including identification of address, APN, General Plan land use designation, zoning, current use, parcel size, and status of and (surplus land or exempt surplus land). The City will work with non -profits and other public agencies to CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-11 evaluate the feasibility of transferring surplus City -owned lands identified to be feasible for conversion to affordable housing and not committed to other City purposes for use in the development of affordable housing by the private sector. The inventory will be updated annually in conjunction with the APR (Program 1). Any disposition of surplus lands shall be conducted consistently with the requirements of Government Code Section 54220 et. seq. Eight -Year Objectives • Maintain an accurate list of surplus City -owned lands for the duration of the planning period • Collaborate with developers of affordable housing to explore opportunities to develop affordable housing at City -owned lands Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget and federal and State technical assistance grants Tim efram e • Annually 4. Replacement of Affordable Units Consistent with the requirements of Government Code Section 65583.2(g), development projects on sites in the housing inventory (Appendix A) that have, or have had within the past five years, residential uses restricted to rents affordable to low or very low income households or residential uses occupied by low or very low income households, shall be conditioned to replace all such units at the same or lower income level as a condition of any development on the site and such replacement requirements shall be consistent with Section 65915(c)(3). Eight -Year Objectives • Identify need for replacement for all project applications and ensure replacement, if required, is carried out CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-12 Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget; replacement costs to be borne by development of any such site Tim efram e • Ongoing 5. Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units QADUs) help meet the City's housing needs for all income levels and also provide a housing resource for seniors and low- and moderate -income households throughout the entire community, not just in any single geographic area. The City will continue to apply Development Code regulations that allow accessory units (also known as second units or granny flats) by right in all residential zones, in accordance with State law. The City of Temecula will continue to amend the ordinance based on future changes to State law and work with HCD to ensure continued compliance with State law. The City will also continue to monitor the extent of ADU production to ensure that the ordinance modifications are successful and that the Housing Element goals can be met. Eight -Year Objectives • Survey and evaluate potential methods to encourage ADU 14 development throughout the community and adopt appropriate procedures, policies, and regulatory provisions. • Monitor State law for future updates to ADU regulations and update the City's Development Code to be consistent with future updates as needed. • Continue educating the community on the opportunity to develop ADUs and promote the development of ADUs affordable to lower -income households. • Prepare and adopt "permit ready" ADU plans to promote the development of ADUs in all geographic areas of the City. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-13 Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Adopt "permit ready" ADU plans by December 31, 2022; ongoing education of ADU development options and distribution of material online and at City Hall Assist in the Development of Affordable and Special Needs Housing (Goal 2) New construction is a major source of housing for prospective homeowners and renters. However, the cost of new construction is substantially greater than other program options. Incentive programs, such as density bonuses, offer a cost-effective means of providing affordable housing. Other programs, such as the County's First Time Home Buyer Program, increase the affordability of new and existing housing. Additionally, the programs to work with the development community to promote the production of housing suitable for persons with special needs can help ensure that equal opportunities are available for persons of different economic backgrounds and housing needs. 6. Density Bonus Ordinance The City will provide for density bonuses consistent with State law, including provisions for density bonuses and incentives for projects that contain 100% very low and low income units. The City will monitor State law updates which impact density bonuses and will update local plans and programs as necessary. Eight -Year Objectives • Continue to encourage density bonus opportunities which increase the total allowable density for senior and affordable housing projects. • Monitor State law for updates to density bonus regulations and update the City's Development Code as needed. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART 1: HOUSING PLAN HP-14 Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efmm e • Ongoing implementation 7. Land Assemblage and Affordable Housing Development The City can utilize CDBG funds to purchase land for the development of lower- and moderate -income housing. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will continue to acquire land for use in the provision of affordable housing. The City will facilitate the development of housing units affordable to lower -income households by publicizing its density bonus program and its incentives, and by making this information available to developers and nonprofit housing agencies through the development application process. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • CDBG Funds Tim efram e Ongoing, as projects are processed through the Planning Department. The City will publicize program incentives on the City's website on an on -going basis. The City will acquire land if, and when, the City has available funds to do so. The City will begin a project if and when funds are secured to do so. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-15 8. Housing for Extremely Low -Income Households Under state law, the City shall identify zoning to encourage and facilitate housing suitable for extremely low-income households, such as supportive housing and efficiency unit housing. The City allows Efficiency Unit Housing in the Medium and High Density Residential zoning districts and conditionally permits them in the Community Commercial and Professional Office zones. Eight -Year Objectives The City will encourage the development of housing for extremely low-income households through a variety of activities, such as conducting outreach to housing developers on an annual basis, providing financial assistance (when feasible) or in -kind technical assistance or land write -downs, providing expedited processing, identifying grant and funding opportunities, applying for or supporting applications for funding on an ongoing basis, reviewing and prioritizing local funding at least twice in the planning period, and/or offering additional incentives beyond the density bonus. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Ongoing, as projects are processed through Planning Department and annual outreach with local developers 9. Special Needs Housing Construction Special needs housing developers work to ensure housing opportunities are available that are accessible to and supportive of persons and households with special needs, such as persons with developmental disabilities. The City will continue to encourage qualified housing developers to pursue development of housing that addresses populations with special housing needs in the City. The City will continue to collaborate with housing developers, specifically special needs housing developers, to identify potential sites, write letters of support to help secure governmental and private -sector CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-16 funding, and offer technical assistance related to the application of City incentive programs (e.g., density bonus). Eight -Year Objectives • The City will advise developers regarding the community's special needs populations and work with developers to promote the inclusion of product types and units that meet the needs of the City's special needs groups. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Contact with developers at least annually and on an ongoing basis to implement the above objectives 10. Mortgage Credit Certificate Program The Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) program is administered countywide by the County of Riverside Economic and Development Agency (EDA) and is a way for the City to further leverage homeownership assistance. MCCs are certificates issued to income - qualified first time home buyers authorizing the household to take a credit against federal income taxes of up to 20% of the annual mortgage interest paid. This tax credit allows the buyer to qualify more easily for home loans as it increases the effective income of the buyer. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will continue to promote the regional Mortgage Credit Certificate program to assist an average of ten households annually by publicizing the program and making the program known to developers and nonprofit housing agencies. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART 1: HOUSING PLAN HP-17 Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Ongoing 11. Energy Conservation and Energy Efficiency The City will encourage the use of energy conservation features in residential construction and remodeling. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will partner with Southern California Edison (SCE) and the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) to promote energy -saving programs such as the Residential Multifamily Energy Efficiency Rebate program, the Heating and Cooling Rebate program, and incentives of up to $4,000 available to SCE and SoCalGas residential customers. • The City will annually ensure that local building codes arc consistent with state -mandated green building standards. l� The City will be responsible for implementing the state's energy conservation standards (e.g., Title 24 Energy Standards). This includes checking building plans and other written documentation showing compliance and inspecting construction to ensure that the dwelling units are constructed according to those plans. Applicants for building permits must show compliance with the state's energy conservation requirements at the time building plans are submitted. • The City will review the General Plan to determine if updates are needed to support and encourage energy efficiency in existing and new housing, especially in areas of the City with lower CalEnviroScreen scores which may suffer from elevated levels of environmental burdens. Responsihle Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-18 Tim efram e • Ongoing, as programs are available. Annually review local building codes, as projects are processed through Planning Department and annual outreach with local developers Remove Constraints to Housing Production(Goal 3) Under state law, the Temecula Housing Element must address, and where appropriate and legally possible remove, governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. The City must also consider the role of nongovernmental constraints to housing development and, to the extent feasible, develop programs to reduce the impacts of nongovernmental constraints. The following programs are designed to lessen constraints to housing development. 12. Development Fees Developers of affordable/senior housing may qualify to receive from the City of Temecula a deferral of development fees, reduction of development fees, or a reimbursement of development fees paid by the developer. Typically, developers of affordable/senior housing pay the City the required development fees. If the development qualifies for a deferral of development fees or a reimbursement of development fees, the developer enters into a contract with the Agency, which then sets the terms of the deferral or reimburses the developer for the fees paid. Eight -Year Objectives • The City of Temecula will continue to enter into development agreements with qualifying senior/affordable housing projects on a case -by -case basis to provide deferral, reduction, and/or reimbursement of development fees. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • CDBG Tim efram e Ongoing, as projects are processed through the Planning Department CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-19 13. Expedite Processing of Affordable Housing Projects Under state housing law, residential projects with an affordable component have priority processing when it comes to the provision of water service from water purveyors. Similarly, the City of Temecula will continue to expedite processing of affordable housing projects. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will continue to implement expedited review to all projects with an affordable housing component. • The City will need to develop objective criteria to evaluate affordable housing projects to qualify them for expedited processing. • The City will continue to prioritize projects based on the level of affordability being proposed in order to meet its regional housing need. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Ongoing, as projects are processed through the Planning Department. The City already prioritizes affordable housing project processing. The City will advertise via the City's website. 14. Emergency Shelters and Transitional/Supportive Housing The Temecula Development Code provides for the provision of emergency shelters and transitional/supportive housing within the City consistent with State law. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will continue to permit emergency shelters and transitional/supportive housing as identified in the Development Code consistent with Government Code requirements. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-20 • The City will continue to work with public agencies and private entities to provide adequate resources for the community's homeless population. The City will also, to the extent feasible, participate in efforts to unite organizations and entities that provide services to the homeless. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Ongoing implementation and annual reporting throughout the planning period 15. Periodic Consistency Review of General Plan, Municipal Code, and State Law To minimize governmental constraints due to inconsistencies between the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, California codes, state law, or regulatory requirements, the City will conduct a biannual review of the Municipal Code and General Plan to ensure internal consistency and to ensure consistency with legislative and regulatory amendments, adoption of new state laws, and policy changes resulting from case law. Eight -Year Objectives • City staff will track and stay abreast of changes in state housing law and work with the City Attorney to incorporate changes into the General Plan and Municipal Code in order to reduce or remove housing constraints. • The City Attorney will advise staff on significant case law interpretations that may cause the need to amend the General Plan or Municipal Code. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART 1: HOUSING PLAN HP-21 Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Biannually review for consistency 16. Zoning Code Amendments — Housing Constraints The City shall update the Zoning Code to remove constraints to a variety of housing types and ensure the City's standards and permitting requirements are consistent with State law. The update shall address the following: A. Low barrier navigation centers: The Zoning Code shall be updated to define and permit low barrier navigation centers consistent with the requirements of Government Code Sections 65660 through 65668, including treating low barrier navigation centers as a use by right in areas zoned for mixed use and nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses. B. Agricultural worker housing: The Zoning Code will be updated to define agricultural worker housing and to identify that any agricultural worker housing consisting of no more than 36 beds in a group quarters or 12 units or spaces shall be deemed an agricultural land use and permitted in the same manner as agricultural uses consistent with Health and Safety Code Section 17021.6. The Zoning Code will also be updated to provide for streamlined, ministerial approval of agricultural worker housing that meets the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 17021.8. C. Employee housing: The Zoning Code will be updated to define employee housing separately from agricultural worker housing and to clarify that employee housing serving six or fewer employees shall be deemed a single family structure and shall be subject to the same standards for a single family residence in the same zone. D. Streamlined and ministerial review for eligible affordable housing projects: The Zoning Code will be updated to ensure that eligible multifamily projects with an affordable component are provided streamlined review and are only subject to objective design standards consistent with relevant provisions of SB 35 and SB 330 as provided by applicable sections of the Government Code, including but not limited to Sections 65905.5, 65913.4, 65940, 65941.1, 65950, and 66300. State law defines objective design standards as those that CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART 1: HOUSING PLAN HP-22 "involve no personal or subjective judgement by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant and public official prior to submittal." E. Emergency shelter parking: The Zoning Code will be updated to require sufficient parking to accommodate all staff working in the emergency shelter, provided that the standards do not require more parking for emergency shelters than other residential or commercial uses within the same zone, in compliance with AB 139. F. Accessory Dwelling Units in PDO Zones: The City will amend Planning Development Ordinance Zones 2 and 7 to specifically allow for Accessory Dwelling Units consistent with State law. Eight -Year Objectives • Ensure that the City's Zoning Code is consistent with State law and update the Zoning Code as needed to comply with future changes. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Zoning Code Amendments adopted by February 2023 Conserve and Improve Existing Housing Stock (Goal 4) A community's existing affordable housing stock is a valuable resource that should be conserved and, if necessary, improved to meet habitability requirements. 17. Preserve At -Risk Housing Units The City of Temecula will implement the following programs on an ongoing basis to conserve the community's affordable housing stock. a. Monitor Units At Risk: Monitor projects at risk of converting to market rate within the planning period. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-23 b. Work with Potential Purchasers: Establish contact with public and nonprofit agencies interested in purchasing and/or managing units at risk. c. Tenant Educa tion: The California Legislature passed AB 1701 in 1998, requiring that property owners give a nine -month notice of their intent to opt out of low-income restrictions. The City will work with tenants of at -risk units and provide them with information regarding tenant rights and conversion procedures. The City will also provide tenants with information regarding Section 8 rent subsidies through the Riverside County Housing Authority and other affordable housing opportunities. d. Assist Tenants of Existing Rent -Restricted Units to Obtain Priority Status on Section 8 Waiting List: Work with the Riverside Housing Authority to place tenants displaced from at -risk units on a priority list for Section 8 rental assistance. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will monitor the status of affordable projects at risk of converting to market rate. • The City will identify nonprofit organizations as potential purchasers/managers of at -risk housing units. • The City will explore funding sources available to preserve the affordability of projects at risk of converting to market rate or to provide replacement units. • The City will assist qualified tenants to apply for priority status on the Section 8 voucher/certificate program immediately should the owners of the at -risk project choose not to enter into additional restrictions. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department and Riverside Housing Authority Funding Sources • CDBG Funds, and Section 8 Vouchers/ Certificates Tim efram e • Annually monitor CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-24 18. Code Enforcement While the majority of the existing housing stock in Temecula is less than 30 years old, there is a need to enforce housing maintenance for some of the older housing units. The City implements a code enforcement program to correct housing and building code violations. The City has adopted and enforces the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Eight -Year Objectives • The City will continue to seek voluntary compliance for code - related issues and violations to enforce the UBC and offer information regarding the City's housing rehabilitation programs to low- and moderate -income households cited for code violations. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Ongoing 19. ResiderAdal Improvement Program The City adopted a Five -Year Consolidated Plan and became a CDBG Entitlement City as of July 2012. The Five -Year Consolidated Plan includes funding a new Residential Improvement Program with CDBG funds. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will utilize CDBG funds or other funds, as available, to provide financial assistance for minor repairs of homes owned and occupied by lower -income homeowners. Eligible repairs include plumbing, electrical, painting, carpentry, roof repairs, and masonry work. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-25 Funding Sources • CDBG Funds Tim efram e • Ongoing, as funding is available 20. Section 8 Rental Assistance Program The Section 8 rental assistance program extends rental subsidies to very low-income families and the elderly that spend more than 30% of their income on rent. The Section 8 certificate subsidy represents the difference between the excess of 30% of the monthly income and the actual rent (up to the federally determined Fair Market Rent (FMR)). Most Section 8 assistance is issued to recipients as vouchers, which permit tenants to locate their own housing and rent units beyond the FMR, provided the tenants pay the extra rent increment. The City contracts with the Riverside County Housing Authority to administer the Section 8 Certificate/Voucher Program. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will continue to contract with the County of Riverside to administer the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program and provide rental assistance to at least 105 very low-income Temecula households. • The City will support the County of Riverside's applications for additional Section 8 allocation. • The City will promote the Section 8 program to second unit owners by publicizing this program and making the information known to City and County agencies and to housing nonprofits. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • HCD Section 8 allocations Tim efram e • Ongoing CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-26 21. Mobile Home Assistance Program (MPAP) To preserve affordable housing opportunities found within mobile home parks, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) provides financial and technical assistance to low- income mobile home park residents through the Mobile Home Assistance Program (MPAP). The MPAP provides loans of up to 50% of the purchase price plus the conversion costs of the mobile home park so that low- income residents or organizations formed by low-income residents can own and/or operate the mobile home park. Heritage Mobile Home Park is the only mobile home park in Temecula. The owners have indicated that they intend to operate the park indefinitely. In the event that the owners decide to close the park, the City will work with the tenants to acquire funding through the MPAP program. Eight -Year Objectives The City will provide technical assistance to Heritage Mobile Home Park residents in pursuing MPAP funds in the event that the owners propose to close the mobile home park. Responsihle Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Ongoing, as funding is available Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (Goal 5) The City of Temecula is committed to implementing programs that affirmatively further fair housing. 22. Equal Housing Opportunity In order to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community, the housing program must include actions that affirmatively further fair housing and promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, family size, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, age, disability, or other protected characteristics. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-27 The Riverside County Consortium, of which the City is a member, has adopted an Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice and has conducted fair housing planning to implement the recommendations identified in the Al. The Fair Housing Program of Riverside County maintains a comprehensive approach to affirmatively further and ensure equal access to housing for all persons. The three major components of this approach are education, training/technical/consultant assistance, and fair housing rights assistance. The Fair Housing Program of Riverside County is also an advocate for affordable housing, legislative reform, local compliance, and research projects relative to fair housing and human rights issues. The agency works with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing and HUD in the referral, enforcement, and resolution of housing discrimination cases. In 2017, the City prepared an Assessment of Fair Housing which included a thorough analysis of fair housing issues and goals and programs related to affirmatively furthering fair housing. This Assessment is included as Appendix D to the Housing Element and provides a detailed roadmap for addressing fair housing issues. The Housing Plan includes the City's 2017 Assessment of Fair Housing by reference and directs the City to implement the programs identified therein in accordance with the Assessment's direction. Eight -Year Objectives • Temecula will continue to participate in the Riverside County Consortium in implementing the fair housing plan. • The City will place fair housing brochures at City counters, public libraries, the Temecula Community Center, and the Temecula Community Recreation Center. Material will be provided in English and Spanish. Copies will also be made available for other venues as requested or identified at later dates. • The City will continue to post information regarding fair housing services on the City website. Information will be provided in English and Spanish. Future fair housing workshops can also be advertised on the City website. • The City will continue to provide referral services to the Fair Housing Program of Riverside County for residents inquiring about fair housing issues. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-28 • The City will continue to update its fair housing brochures to conform to state law. • The City will undertake ongoing efforts to educate the public about affordable housing. • The City will work with the Fair Housing Program of Riverside County to identify any specific geographic areas in the City which have higher levels of discrimination claims and will target outreach and education to these areas. • The City will continue to utilize CDBG funds to affirmatively further fair housing choice through the provision of fair housing education, counseling, anti -discrimination and landlord -tenant mediation services and to provide equal housing opportunities for protected classes. • Implement the programs identified in the City of Temecula 2017 Assessment of Fair Housing Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim ef-.am e • Ongoing 23. Housing Referral Directory The City provides housing referral services through its Housing Referral Directory. People contacting the City are provided information on housing projects offering housing specific to a person's needs. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will continue to offer housing referral services through its Housing Referral Directory. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-29 Funding Sources • Departmental Budget Tim efram e • Ongoing, as funding is available 24. Economic Displacement Risk Analysis The City of Temecula can reduce the impact of displacement when it occurs by preventing practices that increase or enable displacement. To determine if market force economic displacement is occurring due to development of new housing, increased housing costs, or other factors, the City will conduct a study to determine if individuals and families are being displaced and to evaluate local conditions that may contribute to displacement. The study will analyze gentrification locally and will assess how new development and community investments may potentially influence displacement. If this study shows that displacement is occurring, the City will develop an action program based on the identified causes of displacement, including specific actions to monitor and mitigate displacement. Annual review of the action program may result in modifications to further reduce displacement risk. This program addresses the fair housing issue of disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. Eight -Year Objectives Conduct a Displacement Risk Analysis Study to identify the local conditions that lead to displacement and develop and implement an action program based on the results. Identify potential partners to participate in the study that specialize in eviction -related topics related to displacement. Annually monitor program effectiveness. Responsjble Agencies 'qql;4� • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-30 Tim efram e Conduct study by December 31, 2023 and begin to establish resulting programs by June 1, 2024. Ongoing implementation and annual reporting throughout the planning period. Promote Public Participation (Goal 6) The City of Temecula values the role the public plays in planning for fair and equitable housing options for current and future residents. 25. Housing Element Monitoring and Reporting To ensure that the housing programs identified in this Housing Element are implemented and achieve their goals, an accurate monitoring and reporting system is required. Service agencies receiving CDBG funding from the City are required to report on their program accomplishments at least annually. Records from service agencies help the City assess the extent of housing and supportive service needs, particularly regarding special needs populations. The City is also required to submit annual reports to the state addressing its success in implementing the General Plan and Housing Element. These reports provide decision -makers with useful information regarding how successful the housing programs are in meeting the needs of the community. Eight -Year Objectives • The City will continue to require that service agencies report their accomplishments annually. This information will be used by the City to assess the community's housing needs and how well these needs are being met by the existing programs. • The City will continue to submit annual reports to the state assessing the implementation of the General Plan and Housing Element. Responsible Agencies • Planning Department Funding Sources • Departmental Budget and CDBG Funds CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART 1: HOUSING PLAN HP-31 Tim efram e • Annually II. QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES State law requires the Housing Element to include quantified objectives for the maximum number of units that can be constructed, rehabilitated or conserved. Policies and programs establish the strategies to achieve these objectives. The City's quantified objectives are described under each program, and represent the City's best effort in implementing each of the programs. Assumptions are based on past program performance and funding availability, construction trends, land availability, and future programs that will enhance program effectiveness and achieve full implementation of the City's housing goals. The new construction objectives shown in the table are based on the City's RHNA for the 2021-2029 planning period for very low-, low and moderate -income housing, historic trends, and expectations for new second units. Rehabilitation and conservation objectives are based on specific program targets, including such programs as use of Section 8 rental housing vouchers. The table below summarizes the City's quantified objectives for housing during the 2021-2029 planning period. Table 1: Quantified Objectives 2021-2029 Income Category New Construction Rehabilitation Conservation/ Preservation Extremely Low 136 0 180 Very Low 136 35 Low 240 0 Moderate 622 0 0 Above Moderate 1,004 0 0 Totals 2,138 35 180 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT PART l: HOUSING PLAN HP-32 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT PART 2: BACKGROUND REPORT CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE Qom. This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Cycle6 Housing Element Update............................................................................................................................1 I. Introduction....................................................................................................................................................1 A. Community Context...................................................................................................................................1 B. State Policy and Authorization...................................................................................................................2 C. Organization of the Housing Element Background Report and Policy Document.....................................3 D. Relationship to Other General Plan Elements...........................................................................................4 E. Data Sources and Glossary.......................................................................................................................4 F. Public Participation....................................................................................................................................5 II. Accomplishments Under the 5th Cycle Housing Element............................................................................11 A. Review of 5' Cycle Housing Element.....................................................................................................11 B. Housing Production During 5th Cycle RHNA Period...............................................................................11 C. Appropriateness and Effectiveness of 5th Cycle Housing Element.........................................................12 III. Housing Needs Assessment.............................................................................................................................25 1. Introduction and Background...................................................................................................................25 2. Population Trends and Characteristics....................................................................................................26 C. Household Characteristics..................................................................................................................31 D. Income................................................................................................................................................ 33 E. Housing Characteristics......................................................................................................................37 F. Housing Costs.........................................................................................................................................42 G. Future Housing Needs.................................................................................................................................51 H. Special Needs Groups.................................................................................................................................52 I. Units at Risk of Conversion............................................................................................................................66 J. Estimates of Housing Need...........................................................................................................................69 IV. Constraints on Housing Production..............................................................................................................71 A. Potential Non -Governmental Constraints................................................................................................71 B. Governmental Constraints.......................................................................................................................74 C. State Tax Policies and Regulations.......................................................................................................109 D. Infrastructure Constraints......................................................................................................................110 E. Environmental Constraints....................................................................................................................111 V. Housing Resources....................................................................................................................................116 A. Regional Housing Need.........................................................................................................................116 B. Progress Towards the RHNA................................................................................................................117 C. Sites for Housing Development.............................................................................................................120 C. Housing, Financial, and Services Resources........................................................................................130 D. Administrative Resources......................................................................................................................135 E. Environmental Constraints....................................................................................................................137 F. Energy Conservation and Climate Change...........................................................................................137 G. Consistency with the General Plan............................................................................................................138 H. Relationship to Other City Plans and Policies............................................................................................139 I. Priority for Water and Sewer........................................................................................................................139 VI. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Analysis..............................................................................141 A. Fair Housing Needs Assessment.....................................................................................................142 B. Analysis of Available Federal, State, and Local Data and Local Knowledge....................................143 C. Disproportionate Housing Need........................................................................................................154 D. Displacement Risk............................................................................................................................156 E. Assessment of Contributing Factors to Fair Housing Issues in Temecula........................................157 F. Analysis of Sites Pursuant to AB 686....................................................................................................159 G. Analysis of Contributing Factors and Fair Housing Priorities and Goals...........................................161 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBR-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Regional Housing Needs Allocation - 5th Cycle Progress...............................................................12 Table 2: 5th Cycle Program Evaluation.............................................................................................................14 Table 3: Population Trends - Neighboring Jurisdictions................................................................................26 Table 4: Population by Age (2018).....................................................................................................................27 Table 5: Race and Ethnicity(2018).....................................................................................................................27 Table 6: Job Growth and Employment Status...................................................................................................28 Table7: Jobs by Industry ...................................................................................................................................29 Table8: Jobs by Occupation..............................................................................................................................29 Table 9: Travel Time to Work(2018)...................................................................................................................30 Table 10: Commute Method(2018).....................................................................................................................30 Table 11: Households by Tenure and Age (2018).............................................................................................32 Table 12: Household Size by Tenure (2018)...................................................................................................... 33 Table 13: Median Household and Per Capita Income.......................................................................................33 Table 14: Household Income for All Households and by Tenure(2018).........................................................34 Table 15: Households by Income Group(2017)................................................................................................35 Table 16: Occupations with Wages for Extremely Low to very Low -Income Households (2020).................36 Table 17: Housing Stock by Type and Vacancy (2020)....................................................................................37 Table 18: Vacancy by Type(2018)......................................................................................................................38 Table 19: Housing Stock Conditions (2018)...................................................................................................... 39 Table 20: Overcrowding by Tenure(2018).........................................................................................................41 Table 21: Household Size by Tenure (2018)......................................................................................................41 Table 22: Number of Bedrooms by Tenure (2018)............................................................................................42 Table 23: Homes for Sale (May 2021).................................................................................................................43 Table 24: Median Home Value by Community..................................................................................................44 Table 25: Rental Costs(2018).............................................................................................................................44 Table 26: Rental Rates by Number of Bedrooms..............................................................................................45 Table 27: State Income Limits - Riverside County(2021)................................................................................46 Table 28: Housing Affordability by Income Group...........................................................................................47 Table 29: Households by Income Level and Overpayment (2017)..................................................................49 Table 30: Deed Restricted Affordable Housing Units....................................................................................... 50 Table 31: Mobile Home Parks in Temecula....................................................................................................... 51 Table 32: Regional Housing Needs Allocation - 6th Cycle..............................................................................52 Table 33: Senior Population and Households (2010 and 2018).......................................................................53 Table 34: Householder Age by Tenure (2018)................................................................................................... 54 Table 35: Disabilities by Disability Type(2018)................................................................................................. 56 Table 36: Disabled Persons by Employment Status (2018).............................................................................57 Table 37: Developmentally Disabled Persons by Residence Type (2018)......................................................58 Table 38: Facilities and Services for Disabled Persons...................................................................................59 Table 40: Household Size versus Bedroom Size by Tenure(2018)................................................................. 61 Table 41: Families and Female Householder with Children Under 18 (2018)................................................. 62 Table 42: Homeless Facilities(2020)*................................................................................................................65 Table 43: Facilities and Services for the Homeless.......................................................................................... 66 Table 44: Summary of at -Risk Subsidized Housing Units............................................................................... 67 Table45: Summary of Needs.............................................................................................................................. 70 Table 46: Residential Development Standards................................................................................................. 77 Table 47: Residential Development Standards - Old Town Specific Plan......................................................79 Table 48: Residential Development Standards - Planning Development Overlays.......................................80 Table 49: Parking Space Requirements.............................................................................................................81 Table 50: Permitted Housing By Zoning District...............................................................................................88 Table 51: Permitted Housing By Zoning District...............................................................................................90 Table 52: Housing Qualifying for Density Bonus.............................................................................................. 93 Table 53: Density Bonuses Allowed..................................................................................................................93 Table 54: Planning Fee Schedule*......................................................................................................................99 Table 55: Development Impact Fees For The City of Temecula....................................................................101 Table 56: Total Processing and Fees for Typical Single- and Multi -Family Units........................................102 Table 57: Typical Processing Times for Single- and Multi -Family Units......................................................106 Table 58: Regional Housing Need Allocation, 2021-2029...............................................................................116 Table 59: Progress Towards Meeting the 2021-2029 RHNA...........................................................................117 Table60: Remaining RHNA..............................................................................................................................119 Table 61: Vacant Residential Sites (Exclusive of Specific Plans).................................................................124 <11) `I 11 \I1' 111 V (�1 \11: Al I,[ VA ll�1I oI]')11'1V(,III\11\I 1�\'I'(.1v"U\1)1"1 V`IyI Table 62: Vacant Residential Land within Specific Plan Areas.....................................................................125 Table63: Large Lot Inventory ...........................................................................................................................129 Table 64: Comparison of RHNA Candidate Sites Realistic Capacity and RHNA..........................................130 Table 65: Overview of ROI Data Point Indicators............................................................................................147 Table 66: People -Based Regional Opportunity Index (ROI) Low and Lowest Opportunity Census Tracts, Temecula............................................................................................................................................................150 Table 67: Place -Based Regional Opportunity Index (ROI) Low Opportunity Census Tract, Temecula ...... 150 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Median Home Sales Price for Existing Homes..................................................................................43 Figure 2 Vacant Developable Parcels in the City of Temecula......................................................................127 Figure 3: Regional Opportunity Index, People, 2014, Temecula....................................................................148 Figure 4: Regional Opportunity Index, Place, 2014, Temecula......................................................................149 APPENDICES Appendix A — Housing Site Inventory Appendix B — Glossary Appendix C — Public Engagement Summary Appendix D — 2017 Assessment of Fair Housing, Temecula CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-III GENERAL P LA.I\�l HOUSING ELEMENT I. INTRODUCTION A. Community Context Nestled in Temecula Valley in southwestern Riverside County, just north of the San Diego County line, sits the City of Temecula, which was incorporated in 1989. Having grown from a modest initial incorporated population of 27,099, the City of Temecula is currently home to approximately 112,000 residents in an area of roughly 30 square miles. The City is bounded by the City of Murrieta to the north, unincorporated areas within the County of Riverside to the east, west, and south, and unincorporated areas within the County of San Diego to the south. Regional access to the City is provided by Interstate 15, a north/south freeway that connects the Inland Empire region of Riverside and San Bernardino counties to San Diego County, and State Route 79, a primarily east/west highway (although it runs concurrent with I-15 through the City of Temecula) that links Interstate 10 with Interstate 15, and links Temecula to communities further east in unincorporated Riverside and San Diego counties. Since its early beginning, the Temecula Valley has always been a place where the combination of mild climate and beautiful rolling hills have attracted human settlement. The hillsides were the home of the Temecula Indians, the first residents of the area. Ancestors of the Temecula Indians were in this area as early as 900 A.D. The native people from here to the coast who shared the same language and culture became commonly known as the Luisefios, because many of their villages were once under the influence of Mission San Luis Rey. Temecula's modern European history began in the 1800s, when Old Town Temecula played an important role as a stop along the Butterfield Overland stagecoach line, which was to run between St. Louis and San Francisco. Old Town Temecula is the historic core of the City and is located in its western portion. Change from a small agricultural community to an urbanized City began in earnest in 1964 when Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical purchased the 87,500-acre Vail Ranch. Development of the ranch occurred under the design of a master plan that continues to influence the land use pattern and circulation system of Temecula today. While much of the City's development pattern has been guided by master plans over the past 50 years, as the City looks to CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBR-1 accommodate a new generation of residents, future development will occur in line with new master plans (including "Specific Plans") which set the framework for more diverse communities which offer a broader range of housing and lifestyle choices. Moreover, while there continues to be vacant land left to develop in Temecula, the majority of it is currently entitled, under construction, or undevelopable; looking forward, the City is excited to plan for and implement strategic programs which reflect this new development pattern. B. State Policy and Authorization State Housing Law (Government Code Section 65583) requires that a "housing element shall consist of an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. The housing element shall identify adequate sites for housing, including rental housing, factory -built housing, and mobile homes, and shall make adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community." This report is an update of the Housing Element adopted by the City in 2013. The assessment and inventory must include all of the following: • Analysis of population and employment trends, documentation of projections, and a quantification of the locality's existing and projected housing needs for all income levels. Such existing and projected needs shall include the locality's share of the regional housing need in accordance with Section 65584 of the Government Code. • Analysis and documentation of household characteristics, including level of payment compared to ability to pay, housing characteristics, including overcrowding, and housing stock condition. • An inventory of land suitable for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having potential for redevelopment, and an analysis of the relationship between zoning, public facilities, and city services to these sites. Analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels and for persons with disabilities, including land use controls, building codes and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and other exactions required of developers, local processing and permit procedures, and any locally adopted ordinances that directly impact the cost and supply of residential development. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-2 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Analysis of potential and actual non -governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the availability of financing, the price of land, the cost of construction, requests to develop housing at densities below the minimum densities in the inventory of sites, and the length of time between receiving approval for a housing development and submittal of an application for building permits that hinder the construction of a locality's share of the regional housing need. • Analysis of any special housing needs, such as those of the elderly, disabled, including developmentally disabled, large families, farmworkers, families with female heads of households, and families and persons in need of emergency shelter. • Analysis of opportunities for energy conservation with respect to residential development. • Analysis of existing assisted multifamily rental housing developments that are eligible to change from low-income housing to market -rate during the next 10 years. C. Organization of the Housing Element Background Report and Policy Document The City faces important housing issues such as preserving the historic traditions of the community, ensuring that new development is compatible with the existing character, providing a range of housing that meets the needs of all residents, ensuring that affordable housing is available to all segments of the community, and balancing employment with housing opportunities. The Background Report of this housing element identifies the nature and extent of Temecula's housing needs, including those of special populations, potential housing resources (land and funds), potential constraints to housing production, and energy conservation opportunities. By examining the City's housings, resources, and constraints, the City can then determine a plan of action for providing adequate housing. This plan is presented in the Housing Plan, which is the policy component of the Housing Element. In addition to identifying housing needs, the Background Report also presents information regarding the setting in which these needs occur. This information is instrumental in providing a better understanding of the community, which in turn is essential for the planning of future housing needs. Since the update of the City's last Housing Element in 2013, statutory changes have occurred that must be included in the 2021-2029 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBR-3 Temecula Housing Element. These laws have been incorporated in the appropriate sections throughout this Background Report (Part 2 of the Housing Element) as well as in its accompanying Housing Plan (Part 1). D. Relationship to Other General Plan Elements The Temecula General Plan comprises the following 10 elements: (1) Land Use; (2) Circulation; (3) Housing; (4) Open Space/ Conservation; (5) Growth Management/Public Facilities; (6) Public Safety; (7) Noise; (8) Air Quality; (9) Community Design; and (10) Economic Development. Background information and policy direction presented in one element is also reflected in other General Plan elements. For example, residential development capacities established in the Land Use Element are incorporated within the Housing Element. The General Plan goals and policies were reviewed for consistency with proposals recommended in this Housing Element update. This Housing Element builds upon other General Plan elements and is consistent with the goals and policies set forth by the General Plan. City staff maintains a conscious effort to ensure that revisions to any element of the General Plan achieve internal consistency among all General Plan elements. The City also recognizes that recent changes to State laws require the updating of various elements of the General Plan, upon update of the Housing Element, to address the following issues: • Required amendment to address flood hazards and flood management, fire hazards, sea level rises, and other climate change -related issues. E. Data Sources and Glossary The data used for the completion of this Housing Element comes from a variety of sources, including the United States Census, the American Community Survey, Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, various studies produced by the City of Temecula, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) approved data set, the California Department of Finance, the California Department of Employment Development, local newspapers, and local real estate agents. These data sources represent the best data available at the time this Housing Element was prepared. This Housing Element Background Report, along with the state - mandated requirements, includes a glossary of terms used in the element. This glossary has been included to allow readers to better CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-4 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT understand the terminology used in the Housing Element discussion; it can be found in Appendix B of this element. F. Public Participation State law requires that "the local government shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element ." (Government Code Section 65583). Residents of Temecula and other key community stakeholders have had, and will continue to have, several opportunities to provide input during the development of the Housing Element. In February 2020, the City launched its Housing Element Update website (TemeculaCA.gov/housing) to provide the community with an overview of the project, answer key questions, explain the Regional Housing Needs Allocation, and host links for community surveys and workshops. Housing Survey V� On March 26, 2020, the City released a robust Housing Survey to assess current conditions and better understand community priorities regarding housing in Temecula. By the time the survey was closed at the end of August 2020, the City had received over 850 responses. From March through August 2020, the City undertook the following activities to promote the Housing Element Update, educate the community regarding housing opportunities and challenges, and encourage participation in the Survey: Newsletter sent to every resident (approximately 33,000 addresses) which included an article about the Housing Element Numerous social media posts using the hashtag #HouseThis? resulting in 52,000 social media impressions/views and 729 social media impressions generated • Emails sent to over 10,000 stakeholders • Targeted advertisements shared with the Temecula Chamber and Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors • Advertisements and educational material shared on Channel 3 (local broadcast) and the City's YouTube channel e Paper copies of the Housing Survey were made available at City Hall, the Senior Center, area laundromats, and through the City's Homeless Liaisons CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBR-5 The results of the Housing Survey were summarized in a Community Survey Report which was finalized in October 2020 and posted to the City's website for public review and consideration; the Community Survey Report is included as Appendix C. Virtual Community Workshop In an effort to further educate the community regarding the Housing Element Update, the City hosted a live bilingual (English and Spanish) Virtual Community Workshop on September 23, 2020 using Zoom due to social distancing requirements related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Virtual Community Workshop consisted of a recorded presentation providing an overview of the project, local housing conditions and socioeconomic information, and key issues and opportunities which will be addressed in the City's updated Housing Element. Videos of the English- and Spanish -language presentations (which included translated PowerPoint presentations) were made available on the City's website following the live presentation. As of June 1, 2021, the presentation has been viewed 131 times. This this process, the City received the following general types of feedback: • More affordable housing options should be available to meet the needs of all household incomes • The historic character of Temecula should be preserved • New residential growth should be balanced with new infrastructure improvements • People who grow up in Temecula should be able to afford to continue to live here Draft Housing Element Public Review The Draft Housing Element was circulated for a 30-day Public Review on August 17, 2021 (set to conclude on September 15, 2021). As part of this review period, the City hosted a community open house on August 17, 2021 to introduce the Draft Housing Element and solicit public feedback on the Housing Plan. The community open house was advertised on social media in English and Spanish and flyers were posted throughout the community in both languages. Through this process, the City received the following feedback, which is also detailed in Appendix C: • To be summarized upon conclusion of Public Review CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-6 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Stakeholder Engagement The City mailed or emailed meeting notification letters to numerous stakeholders and interested parties, including: • Affirmed Housing • Amcal Housing • Assistance League of Temecula Valley • Atria Senior Living • Autism Society Inland Empire • Birth Choice • Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County • Bridge Housing • Building Industry Association • California Apartment Association Inland Empire • California State University San Marcos, Temecula • Canine Support Teams • Catholic Charities • Chemo Buddies 4 Life • Circle of Care Ministries • City of Murrieta k* • City of Temecula • CityNet • Coachella Valley Housing Coalition • Community Access Center • Community Mission of Hope • Comprehensive Autism Center • County of Riverside Department of Social Services • County of Riverside Economic Development Agency • County of Riverside Health Department • Court Appointed Special Advocate of Riverside County • Desert AIDS • Economic Development of Southwest California • Fair Housing Counsel of Riverside County, Inc. • Foothill AIDS • Go Banana • GRID Alternatives • Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley • Health to Hope • Hitzke Consulting • Homeowners Associations • Hospice of the Valleys • Housing Authority of the County of Riverside • Inland Regional Center • John Stewart Company • Ken Follis • League of Women Voters CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBR-7 • Love of Christ Fellowship Church • Michelle's Place • Mission Village Apartments • OC YMCA • Our Nicholas Foundation • Path of Life Ministries • Pechanga Casino • Project Touch • Rancho Community Church • Rancho Damacitas • Rancho en Espanol • Riverbank Village Apartments • Riverside City and County CoC • Riverside County Office on Aging • Riverside County Sheriff • Riverside Transit Agency • Riverside County Veterans Services • Rose Again Foundation • SAFE Alternatives for Everyone • Safety Research Associates, Inc • Smart Moms • Solari Enterprises • Southern California Council of Governments • Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors • Southwest Workforce Development Center • St. Catherine's Catholic Church • State Council on Developmental Disabilities • State of California Department of Housing and Community Development • Temecula Homeless Coalition • Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission • Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce • Temecula Valley Historical Society • Temecula Valley Unified School District • Temecula Valley Union School District Adult Transition Program • Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association • The Center for Life Change • U.S. Vets Initiative • VA Loma Linda Healthcare • Various religious institutions • Voice of Children • Wells Fargo • Western Riverside Council of Governments CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-8 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Final Housing Element Also prior to adoption the Draft Housing Element a Notice of Public Hearing will be published in the local newspaper and a direct mailing sent to organizations representing the interests of low and moderate income households and persons with special needs Other Comments Received The City has not yet received any other public comments on the Housing Element Update separate from those collected through the above mentioned engagement efforts. o�. r� CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBR-9 This page intentionally left blank. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-10 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT II. ACCOMPLISHMENTS CINDER THE 5TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT The following sections reviews and evaluates the City's progress in implementing the 5th Cycle (2014-2021) Housing Element. This section also analyzes the difference between projected housing need and actual housing production. A. Review of 51h Cycle Housing Element The 5th Cycle Housing Element program strategy focused on the accomplishment of policies and implementation of programs to provide adequate housing sites; assist in development of affordable housing; remove governmental constraints; conserve and improve existing affordable housing; and promote equal housing opportunity. The 5th Cycle Housing Element identified the following goals: GOAL 1: Provide Adequate Housing Sites Provide a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social, and economic needs of existing and future residents. GOAL 2: Assist in Development of Affordable Housing Provide affordable housing for all economic segments of Temecula. GOAL 3: Remove Governmental Constraints Remove governmental constraints in the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible. GOAL 4: Conserve and Improve Existing Affordable Housing Conserve the existing affordable housing stock. GOAL 5: Promote Equal Housing Opportunities Provide equal housing opportunities for all residents in Temecula. B. Housing Production During 5th Cycle RHNA Period The City's 5th Cycle Housing Element specifically addressed housing needs for the City from 2014 through 2021 and will continue to be implemented through October 2021, when the City's 6th Cycle Housing Element will be adopted. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-11 Table 1 below shows the total number of housing units built in the City during the 5th RHNA cycle to date and compares these units with the units required to be accommodated under the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). During the 2014-2021 RHNA period, 1,604 units were constructed in the City and another 291 are under construction and will be delivered on or before June 30, 2021, as shown in Table 1. Between units built and under construction, the City will have delivered 1,895 housing units, 127% of its 5' Cycle RHNA. Table 1: Regional Housing Needs Allocation — 5th Cycle Progress y T E 3 i J K W J ; a) J y 7 y N "O O W CD > `� O N 'O Q O m O � RHNA 187 188 251 271 596 1,493 Allocation Built 7 15 1,574 1,604 Under 0 0 85 206 291 Construction/ Permitted Remaining 180;RN 180 25 171 0 (Surplus 0 Allocation of 1,184 units) Source: City of Temecula, 2021 C. Appropriateness and Effectiveness of 5th Cycle Housing Element The overarching goals and policies of the 5th Cycle Housing Element continue to be appropriate to encourage the City's housing goals. While most goals, policies, and programs included in the 5th Cycle Housing Element continue to be appropriate to address the City's housing needs, the Housing Plan will be updated to provide clearer guidance, to remove redundancies, and to provide more specific direction to encourage affordable and special needs housing at viable sites and affirmatively further fair housing. The Housing Plan will also be updated to streamline programs so that they are easier for staff to implement and to include a matrix of programs that includes mid -cycle timing priorities to make it easier to identify the applicability and timing of programs during the planning period. To improve the ease of use of the Housing Plan, the housing programs will be presented as a user- friendly table. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-12 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT As discussed in Table 2, most housing programs have been effective or are necessary. The intent of these programs will be kept in the Housing Plan, with revisions to address identified specific housing needs, constraints, affirmatively furthering fair housing, or other concerns identified as part of this update. The City implemented many of the housing programs in the last several years and anticipates that these changes will further encourage workforce, affordable, and special needs housing. The City of Temecula has a variety of affordable housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community. By partnering with government agencies, non-profit organizations, and private property owners, it works to create safe and affordable housing for all residents of our community. All the affordable housing units located within the City of Temecula are owned and managed by private property managers. The City maintains a robust "Affordable Housing Brochure" which is available online and at City Hall which catalogs all the City's affordable multi -family rental units and provides the address, unit count, and contact information for each property. The Housing Plan, included as Part 1 to the City's updated Housing Element, included in this 2021-2029 Housing Element includes modifications to make programs more effective, clarify objectives, and ensure that the programs are implementable. See the Housing Plan provided for the goals, policies, and programs of this Housing Element. While the City took a number of significant steps to promote housing during the prior planning period, including adopting General Plan Amendments that added over 3,000 additional residential units to the City's housing stock, the experience of Temecula and other small communities throughout the State demonstrates that it is very difficult for local governments to meet their fair share housing goals for lower and moderate income housing when working alone. All cities, including Temecula, have limited financial and staffing resources and require substantial state and/or federal assistance, which is not always available at the levels necessary to support the City's housing needs, as well as the technical assistance of area non-profit housing developers and agencies. Additionally, Temecula is also facing infrastructure constraints outside of its control, including an immediate need for I-15 improvements and other transportation improvements. As discussed below, the City has modified some of its existing programs to better reflect community priorities and meet state housing objectives, and has introduced a number of new programs to further address short- and long-term housing needs. In order to develop an effective housing plan for the 2021-2029 period, the City must assess the effectiveness of its existing housing programs and determine the continued appropriateness of such programs in CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-13 addressing housing adequacy, affordability, and availability issues. This section evaluates the accomplishments of each program against the objectives established in the 5th Cycle Housing Element, explains any discrepancy in program achievements, and recommends programmatic changes to the 2021-2029 Housing Element. Table 2: 5th Cycle Program Evaluation Program Eight -Year Objective Progress/Effectiveness Continue/Modify/Delete Provide Adequate Housing Sites 1. Land Use Element • The City will monitor the The City continues to monitor the Continue and Development Code availability of sites zoned for availability of sites suitable for residential uses to ensure residential development and has sufficient capacity exists to maintained adequate capacity for accommodate Temecula's the duration of the current planning Regional Housing Need period. Allocation. The City maintains an inventory of • The City will maintain an suitable housing sites, including inventory of sites suitable for whether the site is developed of residential development vacant, and provides this inventory (including underutilized to the development community via commercial sites) and the City's online GIS dataset, which provide that information to includes identification of vacant interested developers. land. • The City will encourage the The City continues to allow reservation of land that is residential mixed use projects to be currently designated for developed at densities of at least 30 multiple -family development units per acre. by providing the multi -family sites inventory to multi- In 2018 the City adopted its family housing developers to Affordable Housing Overlay solicit development interest. (AHO) Zoning District (Chapter The City will update the 17.21 of the Temecula Municipal multi -family sites inventory Code). The purpose of the AHO is at least once a year. to facilitate the development of • The City will continue to affordable multifamily housing, allow residential mixed use to enable the city to meet its housing be permitted at a density of goals, and ensure that affordable 30 units per acre to housing developments will be encourage the construction compatible with surrounding land of multi -family housing by uses by establishing an affordable right. In addition, the City housing overlay zoning district. A will continue to provide property designated within the appropriate flexible affordable housing overlay may be development standards such developed either in the manner as increased building height Provided by the AHO or in the and shared parking manner provided in the underlying opportunities for zoning district. Projects that comply developments with minimum with the requirements of the AHO densities of 20 dwelling units are permitted by right. Two projects per acre in the Zoning have been entitled in the AHO Ordinance. Zoning District and are moving • The City will address Zoning forward with construction. and General Plan Land Use Designation inconsistencies. • To accommodate Temecula's regional housing need for units affordable to lower - CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-14 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT income households totaling 2,007 (1381 4th cycle unaccommodated plus 626 for the 5th planning period), the City will establish an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) on the sites identified in Appendix B, applicable to at least 100 acres. After establishment of the AHO, sites identified in Appendix B will require the following: o Minimum densities of 20 units per acre with a maximum allowable density of 30 units per acre under the AHO 0 50 percent of the remaining need (1,003 units) will be accommodated on sites allowing exclusively residential uses where no commercial or mixed used development is _ allowed. o Multifamily uses at the densities established under the AHO will be allowed by right, without a CUP, planned development permit or other discretionary action pursuant to GC Section 65583.2 (h) and (i) o If needed, the City will amend existing development standards to accommodate the increased allowable densities within the overlay areas. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-15 2. Sites for Emergency • The City will continue to The City continued to work with the Continue Shelters permit emergency shelters as Riverside County Continuum of identified in the Care and other nonprofit Development Code. organizations to provide resources • The City will continue to for homeless persons seeking work with public agencies shelter. Several nonprofit agencies and private entities to continue to provide referrals to provide adequate resources housing facilities for the homeless in for the community's the Temecula Valley area. homeless population. The The City has utilized CDBG funds City will also, to the extent to Support a continuum of services feasible, participate in efforts in Riverside County to prevent and to unite organizations and eliminate homelessness including, entities that provide services but not limited to, homelessness to the homeless. prevention programs, emergency • The City will develop shelter programs and transitional standards for emergency housing. Since July 1, 2017, the City shelters consistent with has funded $71,647 of CDBG funds Government Code Section towards the program administered 65583. through the Temecula Help Center and collaborative efforts to local Community Based Organization (CMOH — Community Mission of Hope). During the City's Consolidated Plan Cycle, which the City is in its 4th year of its 5-year plan the Program has assisted 453 persons on a projected goal of 350 persons for the 5-year cycle. The City has continued to focus on this need and continues to place the high importance on addressing the City's residents facing homelessness and those at risk of being homeless. Additionally, the City provides funding to help support Project TOUCH, a winter shelter operated out of the Roadway Inn in Temecula. For the 2020-2021 season, the City of Temecula provided financial assistance in the amount of $10,000 and the facility provided shelter for 10-12 individuals per night. 3. Sites for • The City will amend the In April 2013 City amended the Modify: The City has Transitional/Supportive Temecula Municipal Code to Municipal Code to require amended its Municipal Housing ensure that supportive and transitional/supportive housing to Code as specified. The transitional housing are be subject to the same permit City will identify new treated as residential uses processing procedures as other objectives to ensure subject only to the same housing in the same zone and to that sites continue to restrictions that apply to require SROs to be permitted by be available for other residential dwellings of right within residential zones. In transitional/supportive the same type in the same April 2013, the City Council housing. zone. adopted an Ordinance permitting transitional and supportive housing, as well as efficiency unit housing in residential zones. Assist in Development of Affordable Housing 4. Density Bonus • The City will establish a In 2018 and 2020, the City adopted Continue Ordinance density bonus program a density bonus program consistent consistent with State Density with State Density Bonus Law CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-16 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Bonus Law (Government (Ordinance 18-10 and Ordinance Code Section 65915). No. 2020-05). • The City will inform The City continued to encourage residential development density bonus opportunities which applicants through the pre- increase the total allowable density application process and/or for senior and affordable housing through the Development projects. Review Committee meeting of opportunities for density increases. 5. Land Assemblage • The City will continue to The City approved one deed- Continue and Affordable acquire land for use in the restricted affordable housing Housing Development provision of affordable developments during the 2017 housing. calendar year. The project resulted • The City will facilitate the in the construction of 15 new very development of housing low-income units. The City units affordable to lower- approved two deed -restricted income households by affordable housing developments publicizing its density bonus during the 2020 calendar year. program and its incentives, Together, they will result in the and by making this construction of 131 affordable information available to units. developers and nonprofit The City issued a Request for housing agencies through the Proposals to develop various city - development application owned sites. One land purchase is process. underway (Uptown Sports District) for affordable housing development. The City actively participates in events and seminars with the development community in order to advertise and communicate our incentives. The City also promotes its Pre -application development process in which incentive information is provided in the initial planning of a future project. 6. ADUs • The City will continue The City continued to allow and Continue to allow and promote the promote the construction of construction of affordable affordable second units. The City second units to result in the has developed a comprehensive construction of ten new website dedicated to sharing second units. The City will information about the opportunity also promote the program by to develop second units and is publicizing the program and currently working on preparing notifying owners of permit -ready ADU plans (not yet underutilized residential complete). property. 7. Mortgage Credit • The City will continue to The City continued to promote the Continue Certificate Program promote the regional MCC Program administered by the Mortgage Credit Certificate Riverside County Economic program to assist an average Development Agency (EDA). Two of ten households annually households were assisted under this by publicizing the program program between 2014 and 2020. and making the program The City actively provides known to developers and information about the MCC nonprofit housing agencies. Program to the general public when inquiries about homebuyer assistance programs are received. Participation in the Coun 's MCC CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-17 Program is approved by the City Council on an annual basis. Last year, an article about the program was published in a local newspaper. 8. First Time Home • The City will work with The City studied the opportunity to Delete Buyer (FTHB) Program Riverside County to establish participate in the County's FTHB a consortium to participate in program but ultimately participation the County's FTHB program. was not feasible. The City will also review state Notices of Funding Availability (NOFAs) as they are released in an effort to participate in the state FTHB program. 9. Housing for • The City will encourage the The City conducts regular Continue Extremely Low -Income development of housing for inspections of affordable housing Households extremely low-income units, and provides them with any households through a variety resources they may request. The of activities, such as City has also syndicated Mission conducting outreach to Village Apartments with a 55-year housing developers on an covenant, rehabilitation, and project annual basis, providing wide solar to reduce climate financial assistance (when impacts. Additionally, Rancho feasible) or in -kind technical California Apartments re -upped assistance or land write- their convent for 55 years, rehabbed downs, providing expedited the project, and made energy processing, identifying grant improvements. and funding opportunities, The City hosts an annual Temecula applying for or supporting Trekkers program to educate real applications for funding on estate agents on the City's zoning an ongoing basis, reviewing process, permitting process, and and prioritizing local funding available support and services. at least twice in the planning The City offers a free pre - period, and/or offering application to all developers to assist additional incentives beyond with due diligence. the density bonus. The City conducted an affordable housing RFP. Two projects are in the pipeline (Rancho Highlands and Las Haciendas). Both projects used streamlining, (AHOZ and Uptown Temecula Specific Plan). One 14 additional affordable project, Vine Creek has also been entitled. 10. Energy • The City will partner with The City has promoted energy Continue Conservation Southern California Edison conservation in a variety of ways, (SCE) and the Southern including: California Gas Company • 2014 newsletter mailer that (SoCalGas) to promote included energy efficiency tips, energy -saving programs such have a request with our social as the Residential Multifamily media team to identify examples. Energy Efficiency Rebate • Nov. 7 2012 Energy Upgrade program, the Heating and California Workshop held at Cooling Rebate program, and library incentives of up to $4,000 • Flex Alerts on August 18, 2020 available to SCE and • Oct. 24, 2019 Wildfire Safety SoCalGas residential Energy Alert customers. • The City will annually ensure • July 8, 2018 Wildfire Safety Alert that local building codes are • November 9, 2020 Recycling consistent with state- Day CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-18 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT mandated green building The City continues to review local standards. building codes to ensure they are • The City will be responsible consistent with state -mandated for implementing the state's green building standards. The City energy conservation also continues to implement the standards (e.g., Title 24 state's energy conservation Energy Standards). This standards and requires applicants includes checking building for building permits to demonstrate plans and other written compliance at the time building documentation showing plans are submitted. compliance and inspecting construction to ensure that the dwelling units are constructed according to those plans. Applicants for building permits must show compliance with the state's energy conservation requirements at the time building plans are submitted. Remove Governmental Constraints 11. Development Fees • The City of Temecula Continue Reimbursement will continue to enter into The City continues to approve development agreements Owner Participation Agreements to with qualifying assist with the development of senior/affordable housing affordable housing and projects on a case -by -case reimbursement of City fees as basis to provide development appropriate. fee reimbursement. 12. Expedite Processing • The City will continue to The City continued to implement Continue of Affordable Housing implement expedited review shorter processing times for Projects to all projects with an affordable housing projects. Three affordable housing affordable housing projects received component. expedited review and processing • The City will need to develop during the 2014-2021 planning objective criteria to evaluate period. affordable housing projects The City continues to implement to qualify them for expedited expedited review to all projects with processing. an affordable housing component. • The City will continue to The City also establishes priority prioritize projects based on based on the level of affordability the level of affordability being proposed in order to further being proposed in order to meet the RNHA. meet its regional housing As part of the City's new Affordable /need. Housing Overlay (AHO) Zoning District (adopted in 2018), the City established Regulations and Development Standards applicable to projects developed pursuant to the AHO. The City is currently undertaking an update to its Zoning Code to identify potential issues related to objective/subjective design standards and will update the Code to create consistent objective design standards in accordance with State law. 13. Periodic • City staff will track and stay The City continued to track and stay Continue Consistency Review of abreast of changes in state abreast of changes in state housing housing law and work with law which would require CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-19 General Plan, Municipal the City Attorney to amendments to the General Plan Code and State Law incorporate changes into the and Municipal Code. There were General Plan and Municipal several housing -related Code. amendments made to the code • The City Attorney will advise during the 2014-2021 planning staff on significant case law period, including amendments interpretations that may related to accessory dwelling units, cause the need to amend the short-term rentals, and density General Plan or Municipal bonus. The City also facilitates Code. weekly meetings with the City Attorney, Staff receives training from the City Attorney, and the City Attorney prepares opinion letters. Conserve and Improve Existing Affordable Housing 14. Preserve At- • The City will monitor The City continued to work with Continue Risk Housing Units the status of affordable interested parties to renew the projects at risk of converting covenants on any expiring to market rate. affordable restrictions. Specifically, • The City will identify the Rancho California Apartments nonprofit organizations as have been rehabilitated and potential upgraded and the property's Section purchasers/managers of at- 8 contract, which was set to expire risk housing units. in 2013, has been renewed for 55 • The City will explore funding years (through 2068). The City has sources available to preserve also worked closely with Mission the affordability of projects at Village as well. risk of converting to market rate or to provide City staff continues to assist the replacement units. general public and tenants with • The City will assist qualified Section 8 rental information. The tenants to apply for priority City continues to work with the status on the Section 8 Riverside County Housing voucher/certificate program Authority regarding displaced immediately should the tenants. owners of the at -risk project choose not to enter into additional restrictions. 15. Code Enforcement • The City will continue to seek The City continued implementation Continue voluntary compliance for of Weed Abatement and code -related issues and Abandoned Vehicle Abatement violations to enforce the programs. Annually during the UBC and offer information 2014-2021 planning period, the City regarding the City's housing generally conducted 20,444 rehabilitation programs to complaint -driven code case low- and moderate -income inspections, 22,015 proactive code households cited for code case inspections, [6,488 weed violations. abatement cases, and 328 abandoned vehicle cases. 16. Residential • The City will utilize CDBG Thirty-four households received Continue Improvement Program funds or other funds, as CDBG funds through the Habitat available, to provide financial for Humanity Critical Home assistance for minor repairs maintenance repair program and an of homes owned and additional five households were occupied by lower -income supported through the CRID homeowners. Eligible repairs Alternatives Solar Improvements. include plumbing, electrical, During the 2014-2021 planning painting, carpentry, roof period, the City has worked with repairs, and masonry work. Habitat for Humanity on CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-20 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT rehabilitation programs. Additionally, CDBG-CV2 funds will be used for mortgage assistance. Since July 1, 2017, the City has funded $151,127.00 of CDBG funds towards the program administered through Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley. During the City's Consolidated Plan Cycle, which the City is in its 4th year of its 5-year plan the Program has assisted 18 households on a projected goal of 15 for the 5-year cycle. The City has continued to focus on this need and continues to place the high importance on assisting low-income residents with maintaining an affordable housing stock and ensuring that owners are able to address critical repairs needed to their homes through these grants. Eligible residents are eligible for $10,000 grants in address the critical needs necessary to their household. 17. Section 8 Rental • The City will continue to The Section 8 Rental Assistance Continue Assistance Program contract with the County of Program is administered by the Riverside to administer the Riverside County Housing Section 8 Rental Assistance Authority. The City assists qualified Program and provide rental tenants to apply for the Section 8 assistance to at least 105 very voucher/certificate program and low-income Temecula provides information about the households. Section 8 rental assistance • The City will support the voucher/certificate program. County of Riverside's Since 2014, 758 units have been applications for additional assisted. Section 8 allocation. City staff provides information on The City will promote the handouts and on the City website Section 8 program to second regarding affordable housing and unit owners by publicizing contact information for the this program and making the Riverside County Housing information known to City Authority regarding Section 8. and County agencies and to housing nonprofits. 18. Mobile Home • The City will provide The City will provide technical Continue Assistance Program technical assistance to assistance to Heritage Mobile Home (MPAP) Heritage Mobile Home Park Park residents in pursuing MPAP residents in pursuing MPAP funds in the event that the owners funds in the event that the propose to close the mobile home owners propose to close the park. There are been no requests for mobile home park. this assistance during the 2014-2021 planning period. Promote Equal Housing Opportunities 19. Equal Housing • Temecula will continue to The City continued to participate in Continue Opportunity participate in the Riverside the Riverside County Consortium in County Consortium in implementing the fair housing plan, implementing the fair post information regarding fair housing plan. housing services on the City • The City will place fair website, and provide referral housing brochures at City CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-21 counters, public libraries, the services to the Fair Housing Temecula Community Program of Riverside County. Center, and the Temecula City staff placed posters at all Community Recreation affordable housing locations, City Center. Hall, public libraries, the • The City will continue to post Community Center, and the information regarding fair Community Recreation Center. All housing services on the City brochures updated and provided to website. Future fair housing the City by the Fair Housing workshops can also be Council are placed at these locations advertised on the City for the public to access. website. • The City will continue to The City actively maintains a provide referral services to website identifying affordable the Fair Housing Program of housing complexes in Temecula. Riverside County for To support and ensure equal access residents inquiring about fair to housing opportunities, the City housing issues. has utilizes CDBG funds to • The City will continue to affirmatively further fair housing update its fair housing choice through the provision of fair brochures to conform to housing education, counseling, anti - state law. discrimination and landlord -tenant • The City will undertake mediation services, and to provide ongoing efforts to educate equal housing opportunities for the public about affordable protected classes. Since July 1, 2017, housing. the City has funded $76,838 of CDBG funds towards the program administered through Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. During the City's Consolidated Plan Cycle, which the City is in its 4th year of its 5-year plan the Program has assisted 1,205 households on a projected goal of 1,750 households for the 5-year cycle. The City has continued to focus on this need and continues to place the high importance on assisting low-income residents with fair housing services for both residents and landlords. 20. Housing Referral • The City will continue to The City continued to offer housing Continue Directory offer housing referral referral services through its Housing services through its Housing Referral Directory. Referral Directory. 21. Housing for • The City will continue to The City continues to implement Continue Persons with treat licensed residential care the Temecula Municipal Code Disabilities facilities and State -licensed which treats licensed residential care group homes serving six or facilities and State -licensed group fewer persons no differently homes serving six or fewer persons than other by right single- no differently than other by right family housing uses. In single-family housing uses. addition, the City will Implementation of the Municipal continue to allow residential Code also allows residential care care facilities with seven or facilities with seven or more persons more persons, by right in the by right in the High Residential zone High Residential zone district district and conditionally in all other and conditionally in all other residential zones. residential zones. The City continues to support and • The City will continue to provide resources for individual provide a formalized homeowners requesting exemptions reasonable accommodation to zoning and development CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-22 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT process for individual homeowners requesting exceptions to zoning and development standards to accommodate a disability. standards in order to accommodate a disability. The City has updated Pala Park to be more accessible. Separately the City has invested in Eagle Soar Splash Pad, an accessible splash pad. The City also makes significant investments in specific programming for people with special needs and hybrid programming (helping people with disabilities interface with those people without disabilities). 22. Employee Housing • The City will amend the The City has undertaken a number Continue Temecula Municipal Code to of updates to its Municipal Code define and permit employee during the past planning period to housing providing address State law. The City will accommodations for six or continue to implement amendments fewer employees. Employee to its Municipal Code to meet all housing shall be deemed a State law requirements. single-family structure with a residential land use designation. • The City will review, and if necessary amend the Temecula Municipal Code to comply with the other requirements of the Employee Housing Act detailed above. 23. Housing Element • The City will continue to The City continues to submit annual Continue Monitoring and require that service agencies reports to the state assessing the Reporting report their accomplishments implementation of the General Plan annually. This information and Housing Element. will be used by the City to assess the community's housing needs and how well these needs are being met by the existing programs. • The City will continue to submit annual reports to the state assessing the implementation of the General Plan and Housing Element. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-23 This page intentionally left blank. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-24 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT III. HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction and Background The purpose of the Housing Needs Assessment is to describe housing, economic, and demographic conditions in Temecula, assess the demand for housing for households at all income levels, and document the demand for housing to serve various special needs populations. The Housing Needs Assessment also addresses whether assisted housing projects are at risk of converting to market rate projects. The Housing Needs Assessment is intended to assist Temecula in developing housing goals and formulating policies and programs that address local housing needs. Several sources of data were used to describe existing demographic and housing conditions, including the following: • Pre -Certified Local Housing Data package for the City of Temecula developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and pre -certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for use in 6th cycle housing elements. • Data from the 2010 U.S. Census, 2014-2018 U.S. Census American Community Survey (ACS), California Department of Finance (DOF), California Employee Development Department (EDD), and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is included to provide information on population, household, housing, income, employment, and other demographic characteristics. • Regional information from the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. • Other sources of economic data such as information from the websites Zillow.com and Apartments.com, and other published data are used where current Census, ACS, DOF, HUD, and other standard data sources do not provide relevant data. • Interviews with key agencies and organizations were conducted to obtain information on housing needs and, in particular, needs of populations with special housing needs. • Research and data related to fair housing, including Census Scope, Social Science Data Analysis Network, the UC Davis Center for Regional Change and Rabobank, N.A., and the California Fair Housing Task Force. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-25 Due to the use of multiple data sources (with some varying dates), there are slight variations in some of the information, such as total population and total household numbers, presented in this document. However, these variations do not significantly affect the discussion of overall housing trends and changes. 2. Population Trends and Characteristics Population Growth Table 3 shows population growth for Temecula and other jurisdictions in the region from 2000 through 2020. According to data prepared by the California DOF, the population of Temecula in 2020 was 111,970 persons, an increase of approximately 11.9% since 2010. During the previous decade (2000 to 2010), the City's population increased by 73.4%. Temecula's growth rate has been higher than the countywide growth rate, with Riverside County experiencing significantly lower population growth rates than Temecula during the 2000 to 2010 period, and slightly lower population growth rates than Temecula during the 2010 to 2020 period, as shown in Table 3. Factors for growth include its affordable housing (compared to Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego County) desirable climate, high quality education system, and geographical features. The rapid growth in Temecula during the 2000 to 2010 period can be partially attributed to the annexation of Vail Ranch in 2001, and Redhawk in 2005. Other Of neighboring jurisdictions, the City of Murrieta had both the greatest numeric change in population (71,279 persons) and the largest percentage change in population (161%). Table 3: Population Trends — Neighboring Jurisdictions Jurisdiction 2000 2010 2020 Change 2000-20 %Change 2000.20 Temecula 57,716 100,097 111,970 54,254 94.0% Lake Elsinore 28,928 51,821 63,453 34,525 119.4% Hemet 58,812 78,657 85,175 26,363 44.8% Perris 36,189 68,386 80,201 44,012 121.6% Murrieta 44,282 103,466 115,561 71,279 161.0% Riverside County 1,545,387 2,189,641 2,442,304 896,917 58.0% Sources: US Census, 2000; DOF, 2020 Age Changes in the age groups can indicate future housing needs. Table 4 compares age cohort sizes in 2018 for Temecula and Riverside County. In Temecula, children under 15 comprise 22.9% of the City's population, teens and young adults (15 — 24) represent 14.3%, and CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-26 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT adults in family -forming age groups (25 - 44) comprise 26.5%. Adults aged 45 to 64 represent 26.1% of the population and seniors (65 and over) comprise 10.3%. In 2018, the median age in Temecula (34.8 years) was half a year lower than that of Riverside County (35.3 years) and a year and a half lower than the statewide median age (36.3 years). The median age of City residents increased, up from 32.8 years in 2010. Table 4: Population by Age (2018) Age Temecula Number Percent Riverside County Number Percent Under 5 Years 7,165 6.4% 158,008 6.6% 5 to 9 8,474 7.6% 169,403 7.1 % 10 to 14 10,027 8.9% 177,796 7.5% 15 to 19 8,768 7.8% 177,697 7.5% 20 to 24 7,232 6.4% 170,153 7.1 % 25 to 34 14,834 13.3% 328,917 13.8% 35 to 44 14,957 13.3% 303,627 12.7% 45 to 54 17,390 15.5% 303,884 12.8% 55 to 64 11,849 10.6% 265,192 11.1 % 65 to 74 7,363 6.6% 186,772 7.8% 75 to 84 3,039 2.7% 101,900 4.3% 85 and Over 1,132 1.0% 39,937 1.7% TOTAL 112,230 100% 2,383,286 100% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS Race and Ethnicity Table 5 shows the ethnic composition of Temecula's population. More than two-thirds (69.2%) of the City's population identify as White. The next largest racial group is "other race" (9.3%), followed by Asian (8.6%), "two or more races" (6.7%), Black or African American (5.1 %), American Indian or Alaska Native (0.6%), and Native Hawaiian and w Pacific Islander (0.6%). More than one quarter of the population (29.6%) is of Hispanic or Latino origin. Temecula is a less culturally diverse community than the County as a whole, which can influence buying preferences and the demand for special needs housing (e.g., multigenerational housing). Table 5: Race and Ethnicity (2018) Temecula Riverside County Race/Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent White 77,689 69.2% 1,450,134 60.8% Black or African American 5,675 5.1 % 153,545 6.4% CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-27 American Indian or Alaska Native 639 0.6% 19,281 0.8% Asian 9,656 8.6% 152,130 6.4% Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 624 0.6% 6,843 0.3% Some Other Race 10,440 9.3% 495,241 20.8% Two or More Races 7,507 6.7% 106,112 4.5% TOTAL 112,230 100% 2,383,286 100% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 33,194 29.6% 1,154,517 48.40% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS Employment One of the factors that can contribute to an increase in demand for housing is expansion of the employment base. Table 6 shows the employment and unemployment rates for persons 16 years and older that were in the labor force in 2010 and 2018. In 2018, ACS data indicated that there were 56,371 employed persons in the Temecula labor force and that the unemployment rate was approximately 6.7%, a decrease from 8.6% in 2010 as the City (and country) emerged from the Great Recession. According to the labor report data compiled by the California EDD, the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Metropolitan Area's average annual unemployment rate in 2018 was estimated at 4.3%, Riverside County's rate was 4.5%, while California's was 4.1%. Table 6: Job Growth and Employment Status 2010 Number Percent 2018 Number Percent Total Persons in Labor Force 49,321 100% 56,371 100% Employed 45,094 91.4% 52,619 93.3% Unemployed 4,227 8.6% 3,752 6.7% Sources: US Census, 2006-2010 ACS and 2014-2018 ACS Industry and Occupations Of Temecula's employed residents, the "Educational services, health care and social assistance" industry employed the most people at 20.7%. The second largest employment sector was the "Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, food services" industry, which had 16.1 % of the total employed persons in Temecula. The top two employment categories in Riverside County were the "Educational services, health care and social assistance" industry at 20.7% and the "Retail trade" industry at 12.9%. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-28 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 7: Jobs by Industry Industry Number Percent Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, mining 228 0.4% Construction 3,348 6.5% Manufacturing 4,564 8.8% Wholesale trade 1,326 2.6% Retail trade 6,067 11.8% Transportation, warehousing, utilities 2,872 5.6% Information 1,131 2.2% Finance and insurance, real estate and rental and leasing 3,013 5.8% Professional, scientific, management, administrative, waste mgmt. 5,356 10.4% Educational services, health care and social assistance 10,691 20.7% Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, food services 7,300 14.2% Other services 2,470 4.8% Public administration 3,210 6.2% TOTAL (Civilian Labor Force) 51,576 100% Armed Forces 1,043 100% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS The City's workforce holds a variety of types of jobs as shown in Table 8, with the largest sector (38.8%) working in management, business, science, and arts occupations, followed by 24.1% in sales and office occupations. Employment and occupation trends play an important role in defining housing needs. This relationship extends beyond the impact of employment growth on housing demand in the City and includes how wage levels and median earnings affect the type of housing affordable to workers and households in Temecula. There is a significant gap, for example, between the median earnings of a resident employed in management and a resident employed in a service occupation, and this translates into the type of housing that is needed in the City. Table 8: Jobs by Occupation Occupation Number Percent Median Earnings* Management, business, science, and arts occupations 20,013 38.8% $72,450 Service occupations 10,783 20.9% $22,418 Sales and office occupations 12,429 24.1 % $32,454 Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations 3,622 7.0% $47,230 Production, transportation, and material moving 4,729 9.2% $35,390 *Median earnings in previous 12 months prior to survey Sources: SCAG 6th Cycle Data Package; US Census, 2014-2018 ACS CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-29 Travel to Work Approximately 53% of Temecula workers 16 years and over travelled less than 30 minutes to work. Comparatively, more than a quarter (25.5%) of workers drive more than 60 minutes to work, which reflects the fact that many individuals working in Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego counties live in Temecula due to its relatively more affordable home prices. Most Temecula workers, 78.0%, drive alone to work and 11.4% carpool. Table 9 identifies travel time to work and Table 10 identifies commute methods for Temecula workers in 2018. Table 9: Travel Time to Work (2018) Number Percent Less than 10 minutes 5,726 12.1% 10-19 minutes 13,544 28.6% 20-29 minutes 5,702 12.0% 30-44 minutes 5,710 12.0% 45-59 minutes 4,625 9.8% 60 + minutes 12,092 25.5% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS Table 10: Commute Method (2018) Number Percent Drive Alone 39,867 78.0% Carpooled 5,827 11.4% Public Transportation 50 0.1% Walk 611 1.2% Other 1,044 2.0% Work at Home 3,716 7.3% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-30 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT C. Household Characteristics According to the Census, a household is defined as all persons living in a housing unit. This definition includes families (related individuals living together), unrelated individuals living together, and individuals living alone. A housing unit is defined by the Census as a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied (or if vacant, is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live and eat separately from any other persons in the building and which have direct access from the outside of the building or through a common hall. The occupants may be a single family, one person living alone, two or more families living together, or any other group of related or unrelated persons who share living arrangements. People living in retirement homes or other group living situations are not considered "households" for the purpose of the U.S. Census count. The household characteristics in a community, including household size, income, and the presence of special needs households, are important factors in determining the size and type of housing needed in the City. Table 11 below identifies the ages of householders in Temecula and Riverside County in 2018 based on ACS data from 2014-2018. Homeowner households are generally headed by residents early middle-aged to middle-aged, with 56.4% of homeowner households headed by a resident 35-59 years of age; however,13.5% of homeowner households are headed by someone 65-74 years. Households who rent their homes trend slightly younger; about 74% of renter households are headed by a person aged 25-54. Qv CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-31 Table 11: Households by Tenure and Age (2018) Temecula Riverside County Number % Number % Total: 33,889 - 718,349 Owner Occupied: 22,127 65.3% 472,401 65.8% Householder 15 to 24 years 172 0.5% 2,850 0.4% Householder 25 to 34 years 2,425 7.2% 43,381 6.0% Householder 35 to 44 years 3,843 11.3% 77,261 10.8% Householder 45 to 54 years 5,896 17.4% 101,801 14.2% Householder 55 to 59 years 2,742 8.1 % 54,048 7.5% Householder 60 to 64 years 2,214 6.5% 49,348 6.9% Householder 65 to 74 years 2,977 8.8% 80,773 11.2% Householder 75 to 84 years 1,384 4.1 % 46,189 6.4% Householder 85 years and older 474 1.4% 16,750 2.3% Renter Occupied: 11,762 34.7% 245,948 34.2% Householder 15 to 24 years 565 1.7% 12,648 1.8% Householder 25 to 34 years 2,604 7.7% 56,200 7.8% Householder 35 to 44 years 3,037 9.0% 60,241 8.4% Householder 45 to 54 years 3,039 9.0% 47,171 6.6% Householder 55 to 59 years 966 2.9% 18,293 2.5% Householder 60 to 64 years 403 1.2% 14,055 2.0% Householder 65 to 74 years 809 2.4% 21,041 2.9% Householder 75 to 84 years 239 0.7% 10,839 1.5% Householder 85 years and older 100 0.3% 5,460 0.8% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year Data Profile (Table B25007) Table 12 identifies the household sizes by housing tenure. In 2018, the majority of households consisted of 2 to 4 persons, which is consistent with the County's profile although Temecula's percentage was higher (70.5% vs. 60.3%). Large households of 5 or more persons made up 15.6% of the total households in Temecula. The average household size was 3.31 persons in Temecula, compared to 3.27 persons for the County. Additionally, the average household size in 2018 for an owner - occupied unit was 3.34 persons per household and 3.25 persons per household for a renter -occupied unit. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-32 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 12: Household Size by Tenure (2018) Temecula Riverside County Number % Number % Owner Households 22,127 100.0% 472,401 100.0% Householder living alone 2,659 12.0% 94,214 19.9% Households 2-4 persons 16,040 72.5% 297,075 62.9% Large households 5+ persons 3,428 15.5% 81,112 17.2% Average Household Size 3.34 persons 3.25 persons Renter Households 11,762 100.0% 245,948 100.0% Householder living alone 2,065 17.6% 61,899 25.2% Households 2-4 persons 7,852 66.8% 135,765 55.2% Large households 5+ persons 1,845 15.7% 48,284 19.6% Average Household Size 3.25 persons 3.3 persons Total Households 33,889 100.0% 718,349 100.0% Householder living alone 4,724 13.9% 156,113 21.7% Households 2-4 persons 23,892 70.5% 432,840 60.3% Large households 5+ persons 5,273 15.6% 129,396 18.0% Average Household Size 3.31 persons 3.27 persons Sources: SCAG 6th Cycle Data Package; U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 ACS; 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year Data Profile (Table B25009) D. Income Household Income From 2000 to 2018, the median household income increased by 52.8% to $90,964 and the per capita income increased by 58.3% to $34,135. From 2010 to 2018, there was an increase in both per capita and median household incomes. Table 13 identifies the per capita and median household incomes. Table 13: Median Household and Per Capita Income 2000 2010 2018 Median Household Income $59,516 $77,850 $90,964 Per Capita Income $21,557 $29,089 $34,135 Sources: US Census, 2000; US Census, 2014-2018 ACS In 2018, the majority (76.9%) of Temecula's households earned in excess of $50,000 per year. The incidence of households earning less than $35,000 per year was significantly higher among renter households (25.5%) than owner households (9.7%). Table 14 identifies household income by tenure. As shown in Table 14, the median income of owner households is approximately $43,000 more than renter households. Compared to the County, median household incomes are higher for both owner and renter households - by 37.6% and 50.9%, respectively. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-33 Table 14: Household Income for All Households and by Tenure (2018) Income All Households Number Percent Owner Households Number Percent Renter Households Number Percent Less than $5,000 485 1.4% 195 0.9% 290 2.5% $5,000 to $9,999 328 1.0% 65 0.3% 263 2.2% $10,000 to $14,999 706 2.1% 327 1.5% 379 3.2% $15,000 to $19,999 707 2.1% 256 1.2% 451 3.8% $20,000 to $24,999 901 2.7% 268 1.2% 633 5.4% $25,000 to $34,999 2,008 5.9% 1,026 4.6% 982 8.3% $35,000 to $49,999 2,706 8.0% 1,391 6.3% 1,315 11.2% $50,000 to $74,999 5,585 16.5% 3,250 14.7% 2,335 19.9% $75,000 to $99,999 5,173 15.3% 3,331 15.1% 1,842 15.7% $100,000 to $149,999 7,904 23.3% 5,770 26.1% 2,134 18.1% $150,000 or more 7,386 21.8% 6,248 28.2% 1,138 9.7% Median Household Income - Temecula $90,964 $107,349 $64,060 Median Household Income - Riverside County $63,948 $77,991 $42,445 Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS Households by Income Group A special aggregation of 2013-2017 ACS data performed by HUD - tided the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data - provides a breakdown of households by income group by tenure. The number of households in extremely low, very low, low, and moderate/above moderate -income groups is shown in Table 15. Nearly 80% of all households are at or above moderate income. The HUD CHAS data indicates the extremely low-income group represents 5.6% of households, and a higher proportion are renters (1,315) than owners (565). The very low-income group represents 6.6% of households and the low-income group represents 10.4% of households. The City's RHNA (see Table 32) identifies the City's share of regional housing needs for extremely low, very low, and low-income households, as well as for moderate and above moderate -income households. As shown in Table 15, there is a larger proportion of renters in the extremely low, very low, and low-income groups, while there is a larger proportion of moderate and above moderate -income groups in owner households. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-34 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 15: Households by Income Group (2017) Income Group Total Owner Renter Households Percent Households Percent Households Percent Extremely Low (<30% AMI) 1,880 5.6% 565 2.6% 1,315 10.9% Very Low (31-50% AMI) 2,210 6.6% 705 3.3% 1,505 12.5% Low (51-80% AMI) 3,510 10.4% 1,900 8.8% 1,610 13.4% Moderate and Above Moderate (>80% AMI) 26,050 1 77.4% 18,430 1 85.3% 7,620 63.3% TOTAL 33,645 100% 21,600 100% 12,045 100% Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2013-2017 Available: https:Ilwww.huduser.gov/portalldatasetslcp.html Poverty Levels The 2014-2018 ACS data indicates that 1,632 (5.9%) of all Temecula families and 7,678 individuals (6.9%) had incomes at or below the poverty level. According to the ACS data, poverty rates are disparate between races and economic indicators are greatest for those identified as Black or African American. In 2018, those identified as Black or African American had a poverty rate of 11.8% compared to 9.2% for American Indian and Alaska Natives, 8.7% for "some other race alone," 7.8% for Hispanics/Latinos, 7.0% for Asians, and 6.4% for Whites. The level of poverty in a jurisdiction often influences the need for housing to accommodate those persons and families in the very low and low-income categories. The U.S. Census Bureau measures poverty by using a set of money income thresholds that vary by family size and composition of who is in poverty. If a family's total income is less than the family's threshold, then that family and every individual in it is considered in poverty. For example, the poverty threshold for a family of two with no children would be $17,120, a household of two with a householder aged 65 or older and no children has a poverty threshold of $15,453, and the poverty threshold of a family of four with two children under the age of 18 would be $25,926. (U.S. Census Bureau, 2019). Extremely Low -Income Households Extremely low-income (ELI) households are defined as those earning up to 30% of the area median household income. For Riverside County, the median household income in 2020 was $75,300. For ELI households in Temecula (and the rest of Riverside County), this results in an income of $26,200 or less for a four -person household or $15,850 for a one -person household. ELI households have a variety of housing situations and needs. For example, most families and individuals CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-35 receiving only public assistance, such as social security disability insurance or disability insurance, qualify as ELI households. Table 16 provides representative occupations with hourly wages that are close to, but not within, the ELI income range as reported by the Employment Development Department. Note that all occupations indicated median annual wages above the ELI income threshold for a one -person household, perhaps suggesting that any employment in Temecula could lift a household out of the extremely low-income group. As shown in Table 15, ELI households make up 5.6% of all households in Temecula. Based on Table 29, 86.4% of ELI households in Temecula pay more than 30% of their incomes for housing. Table 16: Occupations with Wages for Extremely Low to very Low -Income Households (2020) Occupation Title Median Hourly Wage Cleaners of Vehicles and Equipment $12.67 Bartenders $12.64 Gaming Change Persons and Booth Cashiers $12.63 Hosts and Hostesses, Restaurant, Lounge, and Coffee Shop $12.59 Cooks, Fast Food $12.58 Pressers, Textile, Garment, and Related Materials $12.57 Amusement and Recreation Attendants $12.56 Waiters and Waitresses $12.56 Dishwashers $12.40 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations $12.36 Graders and Sorters, Agricultural Products $12.33 Ushers, Lobby Attendants, and Ticket Takers $12.32 Gaming Dealers $12.23 Door -to -Door Sales Workers, News and Street Vendors, and Related Workers $12 20 Farmworkers and Laborers, Crop, Nursery, and Greenhouse $12.20 Dining Room and Cafeteria Attendants and Bartender Helpers $12.15 Source: Employment Development Department, Long -Term Occupational Projections 2018-2028 (accessed May 2021) Pursuant to Government Code Section 65583(a)(1), 50% of Temecula's very low-income regional housing needs assigned by HCD are projected to be extremely low-income households. As a result, from the very low-income need of 1,359 units (see Table 32), the City has a projected need of 679 units for extremely low-income households (i.e., households earning 30% or less of the area median income). Based on current figures, extremely low-income households will most likely be CITY OF TLMLCULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-36 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT facing an overpayment, overcrowding, or substandard housing conditions. Some extremely low-income households could include individuals with mental or other disabilities and special needs. To address the range of needs of ELI households, the City will implement several programs including the following programs (refer to the Housing Element Policy Document for more detailed descriptions of these programs): • Program 4: Replacement of Affordable Units • Program 7: Land Assemblage and Affordable Housing Development • Program 8: Housing for Extremely Low -Income Households • Program 8: Special Needs Housing Construction • Program 14: Emergency Shelters and Transitional/Supportive Housing • Program 17: Preserve At -Risk Housing Units • Program 20: Section 8 Rental Assistance Program • Program 22: Equal Housing Opportunity • Program 23: Housing Referral Directory • Program 24: Economic Displacement Risk Analysis E. Housing Characteristics Housing Type Table 17 identifies the types of housing units in Temecula in 2020. The table summarizes total housing stock according to the type of structure. As shown in the table, the majority of housing in Temecula is single- family detached housing, which accounted for 78.5% of units in 2020. Mobile homes represent 0.4% of the housing stock. Multifamily units represent 17.5% of the housing stock, with duplex through fourplex units accounting for 2.3% and multifamily developments with five or more units accounting for 15.2%. Single-family attached homes represent 7.2% of housing units. Table 17: Housing Stock by Type and Vacancy (2020) Total Single Family Multifamily Mobile Homes Occupied Vacant Detached Attached 2-4 5 +Units Units 36,550 28,701 1,300 847 5,540 162 34,511 2,039 Percent 100% 78.5% 7.2% 2.3% 15.2% 0.4% 94.4% 5.6% Sources: SCAG 6th Cycle Data Package; DOF E-5 Report 2020 Vacancy Rate Table 18 also shows the number and percentage of occupied units and the percentage of vacant units. It is important to note that these counts CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-37 include all vacant units, including those units that are newly constructed but not yet occupied. In order for the housing market to function properly in a city there should always be some level of housing vacancy, otherwise rents or housing prices could skyrocket. The 5.6% vacancy in Temecula is in line with the historical equilibrium in California (5.5% for rental vacancy and 1.2% for homeownership vacancy). ' The 2014-2018 ACS data indicates that there were 2,047 vacant units in 2018. As shown in Table 18, of the total vacant units in 2018, 717 were for rent, 169 were for sale, 180 were rented or sold but not yet occupied, and 503 were for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use. The overall vacancy rate in Temecula in 2018 was 6.0%, a rate which has fluctuated since 2010. Table 18: Vacancy by Type (2018) Vacancy Type Number Percent For rent 717 35.0% Rented, not occupied 117 5.7% For sale only 169 8.3% Sold, not occupied 63 3.1% For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 503 24.6% For migrant workers 0 0.0% Other vacant 478 23.4% TOTAL 2, 047 100% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS Housing Conditions The U.S. Census provides only limited data that can be used to infer the condition of Temecula's housing stock. In most cases, the age of a community's housing stock is a good indicator of the condition of the housing stock. Moreover, many federal and state programs also use the age of housing as one factor in determining housing rehabilitation needs. Typically, housing over 30 years of age is more likely to have rehabilitation needs that may include plumbing, roof repairs, electrical repairs, foundation rehabilitation, or other significant improvements. The 2014-2018 ACS data indicates that only a small percentage (1.9%) of the housing in the City is greater than 50 years old (i.e., built before 1970). Another 5.3% of units were built between 1970 and 1979. The majority of housing in the city (92.8%) was built after 1980. The age of the housing stock indicates that while the need for maintenance and rehabilitation assistance may grow during the planning period, it will likely be attributable to only a small proportion of total housing. Units built prior to 1970 may require aesthetic and maintenance repairs 1 "California's low residential vacancy rates signal more construction," First Tuesday Journal (February 15, 2021). CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-38 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT including roof, window, and paint improvements and some units in this age range may also require significant upgrades to structural, foundation, electrical, plumbing, and other systems. When examining a housing stock to determine what condition it is in, there are certain factors that the Census considers. For example, older units may not have plumbing that is fully functional or the plumbing might be substandard. Table 19 indicates that a small percentage of occupied dwelling units (0.2%) lacked complete plumbing facilities in 2018. Table 19: Housing Stock Conditions (2018) Year Structure Built Owner -Occupied Number Percent Renter -Occupied Number Percent Total Number Percent 2014 or later 539 2.4% 108 0.9% 647 1.9% 2010 to 2013 879 4.0% 390 3.3% 1,269 3.7% 2000 to 2009 7,136 32.3% 4,406 37.5% 11,542 34.1% 1990 to 1999 7,643 34.5% 3,470 29.5% 11,113 32.8% 1980 to 1989 4,516 20.4% 2,356 20.0% 6,872 20.3% 1970 to 1979 1,004 4.5% 808 6.9% 1,812 5.3% 1960 to 1969 226 1.0% 71 0.6% 297 0.9% 1950 to 1959 93 0.4% 50 0.4% 143 0.4% 1940 to 1949 27 0.1 % 44 0.4% 71 0.2% 1939 or earlier 64 0.3% 59 0.5% 123 0.4% TOTAL 22,127 1 100% 11,762 100% 33,889 100% Plumbing Facilities (Occupied Units) Units with Complete Plumbing Facilities 22,095 99.9% 11,727 99.7% 33,822 99.8% Units Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities 32 0.1% 35 0.3% 67 0.2% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS (Table B25036) As noted, the City's housing stock is relatively new with only 7.2% of dwelling units in Temecula having been constructed prior to 1980. As such, while structural deterioration and maintenance problems may exist, only a small portion is likely to require rehabilitation. To supplement the Census information regarding housing conditions, the City of Temecula included specific questions pertaining to the quality of the City's housing stock in its Housing Element Update community survey, which was available on the City's website from March 26 through September 30, 2020 (this is further detailed in Appendix B). When asked to rate the physical condition of the residence they lived in, the majority (46.4%) responded that their home shows signs of minor deferred maintenance such as peeling paint or chipped stucco, while 33.2% indicated that their home was in excellent condition. Another 12.6% of respondents indicated that their home CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-39 Qv was in need of a modest repair (like a new roof or new siding) and only 5.0% reported that their home needed a major repair (such as new foundation, complete new plumbing, or complete new electrical). Homeowners were more likely than renters to respond that their residence was in excellent condition (40% to 16%). Community members were also asked to report the type of home improvements they have considered making to their homes. The most popular answers that applied were improvements for painting, "does not apply" (meaning they are not considering any improvements at this time), solar, and new heating and air conditioning (HVAC). Additionally, the City's Planning Division has identified homes built prior to 1990 as potentially in need of rehabilitation and multifamily homes built prior to 2000 may be in need of energy efficiency retrofits and other rehabilitation. The City will continue to implement its Residential Improvement Program using CDBG funds to help lower - income homeowners to rehabilitate substandard housing. Overcrowding Typically, a housing unit is considered overcrowded if there is more than one person per room and severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 persons per room. Table 20 summarizes overcrowding data for Temecula. It should be noted that kitchenettes, strip or Pullman kitchens, bathrooms, porches, balconies, foyers, halls, half -rooms, utility rooms, unfinished attics, basements, or other space for storage are not defined as rooms for Census purposes. Overcrowded households are usually a reflection of the lack of affordable housing available. Households that cannot afford housing units suitably sized for their families are often forced to live in housing that is too small for their needs, which may result in poor physical condition of the dwelling unit. In 2018, 994 housing units (2.9% of the total occupied units) were overcrowded, which represented 2% of owner units and 4.7% of renter units. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-40 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 20: Overcrowding by Tenure (2018) Persons per Room Owner Number Percent Renter Number Percent Total Number Percent 1.00 or less 21,682 98.0% 11,213 95.3% 32,895 97.1% 1.01 to 1.50 378 1.7% 396 3.4% 774 2.3% 1.51 or more 67 0.3% 153 1.3% 220 0.6% TOTAL 22,127 100% 11,762 100% 33,889 100% Overcrowded 445 2.0% 549 4.7% 994 2.9% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS As shown in Table 21, the average household size in Temecula was 3.31 persons in 2018, which was slightly higher than the City's average household size in 2010 (3.15). Table 21 shows Temecula's household sizes for owner, renter, and all households. The average household size was higher for owners (3.34 persons). Renter households had an average size of 3.25 persons. The majority (72.5%) of owner households had two to four persons, compared to 66.8% of renter households that were two to four persons in size. Table 22 identifies bedrooms by tenure. Although large owner households and large renter households are proportionally equivalent (15.5% vs. 15.70/o), the proportion of larger homes (4 or more bedrooms) is significantly higher for owner households. Table 21: Household Size by Tenure (2018) Household Size Owner Number Percent Renter Number Percent Total Number Percent 1-person 2,659 12.0% 2,065 17.6% 4,724 13.9% 2-person 6,974 31.5% 3,182 27.1% 10,156 30.0% 3-person 4,326 19.6% 2,137 18.2% 6,463 19.1% 4-person 4,740 21.4% 2,533 21.5% 7,273 21.5% 5-person 2,300 10.4% 1,334 11.3% 3,634 10.7% 6-person 749 3.4% 325 2.8% 1,074 3.2% 7-or-more-person 379 1.7% 186 1.6% 565 1.7% TOTAL 22,127 100% (65.3% of total) 11,762 100% (34.7% of total) 33,889 100% Average Household Size 3.34 3.25 3.31 Source: SCAG 6th Cycle Data Package CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-41 Table 22: Number of Bedrooms by Tenure (2018) Bedroom Type Number Owner Percent Renter Number Percent Total Number Percent No bedroom 65 0.3% 172 1.5% 237 0.7% 1-bedroom 6 0.0% 1,396 11.9% 1,402 4.1% 2-bedroom 1,375 6.2% 3,941 33.5% 5,316 15.7% 3-bedroom 8,416 38.0% 3,177 27.0% 11,593 34.2% 4-bedroom 9,090 41.1% 2,348 20.0% 11,438 33.8% 5 or more bedroom 3,175 14.3% 728 6.2% 3,903 11.5% TOTAL 22,127 100% 11,762 100% 33,889 100% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS F. Housing Costs As shown in Figure 1, between 2000 and 2018, median home sales prices in Temecula increased 134% while prices in the SCAG region increased 151%. The 2018 median home sales price in Temecula was $460,000, down from a high of $491,500 experienced in 2006. Prices in the City have ranged from a low of 76.5% of the SCAG region median in 2008 to a high of 97.4% in 2004. In May 2021, there were 172 homes listed for sale on Zillow.com with prices ranging from $79,000 (manufactured home) to $6,900,000 for a 9 bed/10 bath home. Of these homes, there were 149 detached single- family homes with sales prices beginning at $429,999. As shown in Table 23, most homes for sale are in the $700,000+ price range (55.2%), with 32.6% of homes in the $500,000 to $699,999 range and 12.2% of homes priced under $500,000. Zillow identified the April 2021 median sales price as $586,159. While the median sales price is not affordable to lower and moderate -income households (see Table 28), the City's home sales prices, which are more than $100,000 higher compared to Riverside County (Zillow reported a median home sales price of $475,454 for the County in April 2021), could result in demand from the above -moderate income group who seek higher priced units that may offer more space or amenities than other homes in the southern California region, including Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego counties. Additionally, the long-term home cost impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic remain to be seen. While it is possible that some price impacts are temporary (i.e., higher than average rental rates), it is possible that the pandemic will leave a permanent impact on the housing market; the City will continue to monitor these changes and work proactively to address issues related to home availability and cost as defined in the Housing Plan. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-42 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 23: Homes for Sale (May 2021) Price Homes Percent $700,000 and more 95 55.2% $600,000 - $699,999 27 15.7% $500,000 - $599,999 29 16.9% $400,000 - $499,999 20 11.6% $300,000 - $399,999 0 0% $200,000 - $299,999 0 0% $100,000 - $199,999 0 0% $0 - $99,999 1 0.6% Source: Zillow.com, 2021 Figure 1: Median Home Sales Price for Existing Homes $500.000 $400.000 - $300.000 $200,000 - - $100.000 — 120.0% 100.0% -'-- s0.0% 60.00/4 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 00 (S' O1 0"� Off` 00 d, OA 00 d, 'y0 ,� Y'1. y", Y11 tih y0 yA y0 �O ry0 y0 0ry0 ry0 f �O 0f ti0 0'p �O �O �O �O 'p 'P --*—Temecula —*-- SGAG - - - Temecula Percentage of SCAG Price Source: SCAG 6th Cycle Data Package Housing costs are affected by supply and demand and can affect the affordability of the housing in the City of Temecula. Table 24 shows the median home value in Temecula was $426,400 in 2018. Home values in Temecula are some of the highest in the region, highlighting the importance of Temecula's commitment to continue to provide additional opportunities for more affordable and attainable housing options. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-43 Table 24: Median Home Value by Community Table 25: Rental Costs (2018) W J Jurisdiction Median Home Value Perris $261, 000 Menifee $329,800 Murrieta $400,300 Temecula $426,400 Lake Elsinore $333,600 Riverside County $347,600 Source: American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates, 2018. Rental Housing Table 25 summarizes rents paid in Temecula in 2018 by rental range. The range with the highest percentage of units rented was between $1,500 and $1,999 at 33.4% (3,809 units). Only 8.7% of rentals were under $1,000 per month. Almost one-third (35.7%) of all rentals were over $2,000 per month. Based on a review of rental ads on Zillow.com, Hotpads.com, and Apartments.com, the median rent in Temecula is $2,435 per month. There were 120 rentals available in May 2021. Rents ranged from $1,460 to $3,000 for 2 bed/2 bath homes to $2,400 and more for a four -bedroom home. It should be noted that this data was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, when rental rates are at an all-time high due to limited supply, public health concerns, and renters' inability to secure other safe and affordable housing options. Table 25 below reflects rental costs as of 2018, which may be more indicative of long- term rental rates than the units specifically listed for rent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rent Range Number Percent Less than $500 215 1.9% $500 to $999 774 6.8% $1,000 to $1,499 2,520 22.1% $1,500 to $1,999 3,809 33.4% $2,000 to $2,499 2,575 22.6% $2,500 to $2,999 1,137 10.0% $3,000 or more 358 3.1 % Median (dollars) $ 1,787 Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-44 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 26: Rental Rates by Number of Bedrooms Bedroom Type Rental Survey Units Available Range Average Rent Studio 0 N/A N/A 1 bed 7 $1,345 - $2,850 $1,632 2 bed 80 $1,460 - $3,000 $1,816 3 bed 20 $2,000 - $3,600 $2,290 4 bed or more 13 $2,400+ N/A Sources: Zillow.com and Apartments.com, May 2021 Income Groups The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) publishes household income data annually for areas in California. Table 27 shows the maximum annual income level for each income group adjusted for household size for Riverside County. The maximum annual income data is then utilized to calculate the maximum affordable housing payments for different households (varying by income level) and their eligibility for housing assistance programs. • Extremely Low -Income Households have a combined income at or lower than 30% of area median income (AMI), as established by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). • Very Low -Income Households have a combined income between 30 and 50% of AMI, as established by HCD. • Low -Income Households have a combined income between 50 and 80% of AMI, as established by HCD. • Moderate -Income Households have a combined income between 80 and 120% of AMI, as established by HCD. • Above Moderate -Income Households have a combined income greater than 120% of AMI, as established by HCD. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-45 Tabie 27: State Income Limits - Riverside County (2021) Income Group 1 Person 2 Person 3 Person 4 Person 5 Person 6 Person 7 Person 8 Person Extremely Low $16,600 $19,000 $21,960 $26,500 $31,040 $35,580 $40,120 $44,660 Very Low $27,650 $31,600 $35,550 $39,500 $42,700 $45,850 $49,000 $52,150 Low $44,250 $50,600 $56,900 $63,200 $68,300 $73,350 $78,400 $83,450 Moderate $65,100 $74,400 $83,700 $93,000 $100,450 $107,900 $115,300 $122,750 Above Moderate $65,100+ $74,400+ $83,700+ $93,000+ $100,450+ $107,900+ $115,300+ $122,750+ Source: HCD 2021 Riverside County Income Limits Housing Affordability Table 28 shows the estimated maximum rents and sales prices, respectively, that are affordable to very low, low, moderate, and above moderate -income households. Affordability is based on a household spending 30% or less of their total household income for shelter. Affordability is based on the maximum household income levels established by HCD (Table 27). The annual income limits established by HCD are similar to those used by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for administering various affordable housing programs. Maximum affordable sales price is based generally on the following assumptions: 4% interest rate, 30-year fixed loan, and down payments that vary with income level, as described in Table 3- 25. Comparing the maximum affordable housing costs in Table 28 to the rental rates in Table 25 and Table 26, rental rates in Temecula as of mid-2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic which has increased housing costs across the board, are generally affordable to moderate - income and above moderate -income households. While there may be IN, some units affordable to lower -income households, units are generally scarce. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Temecula, like cities all over the country, has seen limited supply and increased A*W*ANkL demand for safe and affordable housing. It can be expected that as the City recovers from the impacts related to COVID-19, housing options will increase to pre -pandemic levels and home costs may become more affordable. In May 2021, there were no rental units available under $1,345 a month - meaning available units are not affordable for extremely low or very low-income groups. Moderate and above moderate -income households can afford a broad range of available housing. Although there are homes for sale in Temecula available to very low, low, moderate, and above moderate income groups based on a comparison of Table 24 and Table 28, the majority of homes (i.e. in CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-46 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT the $700,000+ range) are affordable to only above moderate -income households. Table 28: Housing Affordability by Income Group One Person Two Person Four Person Six Person Income Group Home Sale Price* Monthly Rent or Housing Cost Home Sale Price* Monthly Rent or Housing Cost Home Sale Price* Monthly Rent or Housing Cost Home Sale Price* Monthly Rent or Housing Cost Extremely Low $55,163 $396 $63,941 $453 $92,887 $655 $126,874 $879 Very Low $100,051 $660 $114,682 $754 $143,945 $941 $167,550 $1,093 Low $165,423 $1,055 $188,833 $1,205 $235,848 $1,506 $270,347 $1,748 Moderate $255,004 $1,581 $290,315 $1,808 $360,740 $2,259 $417,119 $2,620 Above Moderate $255,004+ $1,581+ $290,315+ $1,808+ $360,740+ $2,259+ $417,119+ $2,620+ *Maximum affordable sales price is based on the following assumptions: 4.0% interest rate, 30-year fixed loan; down payment: $5, 000 — extremely low, $10, 000 — very low; $15, 000 — low, $25, 000 — moderate; property tax, utilities, and homeowners insurance as 30% of monthly housing cost (extremely low/very low), 28% of monthly housing cost (low), and 25% of monthly housing cost (moderate/above moderate). Homes sales prices are rounded to nearest $100. Source: De Novo Planning Group, 2021 Extremely Low income Households As previously described, extremely low-income households earn less than 30% of the County Area Median Income (AMI). Depending on the household size, these households can afford rents between $396 and $879 per month and homes priced at $55,163 to $126,874. As of May 2021, there were no rental homes listed on Zillow or Apartments.com that would be affordable to extremely low-income households. However, based on US Census data, approximately 8% of renters pay monthly rents affordable to extremely low-income households. Extremely low-income households may be able to afford to purchase a mobile home in Temecula; however, real estate listings for these homes indicate that homes affordable at this price point may have age restrictions and are in very limited supply. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-47 Very Low-income Households Very low-income households earn between 31% and 50% of the County Area Median Income (AMI). Depending on the household size, these households can afford rents between $660 to $1,093 per month and homes priced at $100,051 and $167,550. As of May 2021, there were no rental homes listed on Zillow or Apartments.com that could be affordable to very low-income households. However, based on US Census data, approximately 9% of renters pay monthly rents affordable to very low-income households (inclusive of units also affordable to extremely low-income). Very low-income households may be able afford to purchase a mobile home in Temecula; however, even those affordable to very low-income households may have age restrictions and there continues to be a very limited supply. Low-income Households Low-income households earn between 51% and 80% of the County Area Median Income (AMI). Depending on the household size, these households can afford rents between $1,055 to $1,748 per month and homes priced at $165,423 to $270,347. As of May 2021, some rentals listed on Zillow or Apartments.com would be affordable to low- income households; these units include one- and two -bedroom options. Based on US Census data, about one-third (30.8%) of renters pay monthly rents affordable to larger low-income households, meaning the rent is less than $1,748 per month. However, it should be noted that most renters are not six -person households, so the actual affordability by household size may be significantly more limited. Low- income households may be able to afford to purchase a mobile home in Temecula; however, even those affordable to low-income households may have age restrictions and there continues to be a very limited supply. Moderate income Households Moderate -income households earn between 80% and 120% of the County Area Median Income (AMI). Depending on the household size, these households can afford rents between $1,581 to $2,620 per month and homes priced at $255,004 to $417,119. As of May 2021, most rental units available were affordable to moderate -income households; these units included multifamily homes as well as single-family homes listed for rent by the homeowner. As of mid-2021, moderate -income households still cannot afford the vast majority of homes listed for sale as of May 2021 (which are primarily single-family detached homes), but may be able to afford other housing choices such as mobile homes and multifamily homes. This is further confirmed by US Census data. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-48 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Overpayment As with most communities, the location of the home is one of the biggest factors with regard to price. Relative to Riverside County, housing in Temecula is more expensive. Furthermore, housing is generally not affordable to extremely low, very low, and low-income households of smaller sizes. As shown in Table 29, 49.9% of renters in Temecula and 29.7% of homeowners overpay for housing. The majority of renters that overpay are in the lower income groups, with 79.8% in the extremely low- income group and 73.1% in the very low-income group severely overpaying for housing (over 50% of their monthly income). Comparatively, 77.9% of extremely low-income owners and 66% of very low-income owners are severely overpaying. Therefore, while overpayment is more predominate among lower income renter households, overpayment is an issue for both renter and owner households. More than one-third (37%) of all households in Temecula overpay for housing. Table 29: Households by Income Level and Overpayment (2017) Household Overpayment Renters Owners Total % of Income Category Extremely Low -Income Households 1,315 565 1,880 100% With Cost Burden >30% 1,115 / 84.8% 505 / 89.4% 1,625 86.4% With Cost Burden >50% 1,050 / 79.8% 440 / 77.9% 1,495 79.5% Very Low -Income Households 1,505 705 2,210 100% With Cost Burden >30% 1,300 / 86.4% 560 / 79.4% 1,855 83.9% With Cost Burden >50% 1,100 / 73.1% 465 / 66% 1,565 70.8% Low -Income Households 1,610 AOL 1,900 3,510 100% With Cost Burden >30% 1,375 / 85.4% 1,200 / 63.2% 2,580 73.5% With Cost Burden >50% 810 / 50.3% 770 / 40.5% 1,585 45.2% Total Extremely Low, Very Low, and 3,790 / 85.6% 2,265 / 71.5% 6,060 80% of lower income Low-lnco % households Moderate and Above Moderate -Income 7,620 18,430 26,050 100% Households With Cost Burden >30% 2,225 / 29.2% 4,160 / 22.6% 6,385 24.5% With Cost Burden >50% 210 / 2.8% 520 / 2.8% 735 2.8% 12,04 21,600 With Cost Burden >30% 6,015 / 49.9% 6,425 / 29.7% 12,445 37.0% With Cost Burden >50% 3,170 / 26.3% 2,195 / 10.2% 5,365 15.9% Note: Data is rounded to the nearest 5. Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2013-2017 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-49 Affordable Housing Inventory The City uses various funding sources to preserve and increase the supply of affordable housing through new construction and the acquisition and/or rehabilitation of renter -occupied units. Affordability covenants in Temecula include developments that hold federal subsidy contracts, received tax credits or mortgage revenue bonds, and/or were financed by redevelopment funds or non-profit developers. Table 30 shows assisted units with covenants that require rents to be maintained at affordable levels for various agreed upon periods of time. In 2020, Temecula had 759 total deed -restricted affordable units. A recorded deed restriction serves as an affordability covenant that restricts the income level of a person who occupies the property, and ensures the property will remain available for low to moderate -income persons through the foreseeable future. Table 30: Deed Restricted Affordable Housing Units No. of No. of Total Project Name Address Type Restricted Units Units Cameron Historical Building 41925 5th St., Temecula CA Equal Opportunity 24 24 92590 Housing Cottages of Old Town Varies 17 17 Creekside Apts. 28955 Pujol St., Temecula CA 49 49 92590 Front Street Plaza 28693 Old Town Front St., Family/Seniors 23 23 Temecula CA 92590 Habitat I Varies 2 2 Habitat II Varies 7 7 Madera Vista Apts. 44155 Margarita Rd., Temecula Family/Seniors 110 110 CA 92592 Mission Village Apts. 28497 Pujol St., Temecula CA Family 75 76 92590 Oaktree Apts. 42176 Lyndie Ln., Temecula CA Family 44 45 92591 Palomar Heritage 41955 5th St., Temecula CA Family 22 22 Apartments 92590 Portola Terrace Apts. 28701 Pujol St., Temecula CA Family/Seniors 44 45 92590 Rancho California Apts. 29210 Stonewood Rd., Temecula Family 54 55 CA 92591 Rancho Creek Apts. 28464 Felix Valdez Rd., Temecula Family 30 30 CA 92590 Rancho West Apts. 42200 Main St., Temecula CA Family 150 150 92590 Riverbank Apts. 28500 Pujol St., Temecula CA Senior 65 66 92590 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-50 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Temecula Reflections 31111 Black Maple Dr., Temecula Family 11 11 Townhomes CA 92592 Warehouse at Creekside 42081 Third St., Temecula CA Family 32 32 Apts. 92590 Total 759 764 Sources: California Housing Partnership, 2021; National Housing Preservation Database, 2021; US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2021 Mobile Homes Mobile homes offer a more affordable option for those interested in homeownership. The median value of a mobile home in Riverside County in 2018 was $60,200 (2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profile). Overall, 161 mobile homes are located in Temecula (DOF, Table 2: E- 5, 1 /1 /2019). As shown by Table 31, there is one mobile home park in the City with a total of 196 permitted spaces. In addition to the cost of a mobile home, owners must either purchase a residential site or rent a mobile home space. And although they present a more affordable alternative, mobile home rents have risen steadily throughout southern California since 2009.2 Table 31: Mobile Home Parks in Temecula Park Name/Address Operator MH Spaces HERITAGE MH COMMUNITY (33-0386-MP) 31130 S. CAREFREE COMMUNITIES CA, LLC 196 GENERAL KEARNY RD, TEMECULA, CA 92591 Total Mobile Home Spaces 196 Source: HCD 2019 Mobile Home Park Listings G. Future Housing Needs A Regional Housing Needs Plan (RHNP) is mandated by the State of California (Government Code Section 65584) for regions to address housing issues and needs based on future growth projections for the area. The RHNP for Temecula is developed by the Southern California '416�;S3 Association of Governments (SCAG), and allocates a "fair share" of regional housing needs to individual cities. The intent of the RHNP is to ensure that local jurisdictions address not only the needs of their immediate areas but also that needs for the entire region are fairly distributed to all communities. A major goal of the RHNP is to ensure that every community provides an opportunity for a mix of affordable housing to all economic segments of its population. Z Jeff Collins, "Soaring rents jolt senior tenants at mobile home park," OC Registrar (July 20, 2018). CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-51 As the regional planning agency, SCAG determines the City's fair share of housing through the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process. This Housing Element addresses SCAG's RHNA schedule for the 6th Cycle, from 2021 through 2029. The City will need to plan to accommodate 4,193 new units, which includes 679 extremely low- income units, 680 very low, 801 low, 778 moderate, and 1,255 above moderate -income units. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65583(a)(1), 50% of Temecula's very low-income regional housing needs assigned by HCD are extremely low-income households, and hence the 679 ELI units. Table 32 summarizes Temecula's fair share, progress to date, and remaining units. Table 32: Regional Housing Needs Allocation — 6th Cycle Status Extremely Low Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate TOTAL RHNA Allocation 679 680 801 778 1,255 4,193 Constructed/ 0 0 0 21 6 27 Under Construction/ Permits Issued (Since 6/30/2021) Approved/Entitled/ 24 8 99 0 0 132 In Process Remaining Allocation 656 671 702 757 1,249 4,034 Source: Southern California Association of Governments, 2020; City of Temecula, 2021 H. Special Needs Groups Government Code Section 65583(a)(7) requires a housing element to address special housing needs, such as those of the elderly; persons with disabilities, including a developmental disability, as defined in Section 4512 of the Welfare and Institutions Code; large families; farmworkers; families with female heads of households; and families and persons in need of emergency shelter. The needs of these groups often call for targeted program responses, such as temporary housing, preservation of residential hotels, housing with features to make it more accessible, and the development of four -bedroom apartments. Special needs groups have been identified and, to the degree possible, responsive programs are provided. A principal emphasis in addressing the needs of these groups is to continue to seek state technical assistance grants to identify the extent and location of those with special needs and identify ways and means to assist them. Local government budget limitations may act to limit effectiveness in implementing programs for these groups. Please refer to Section 6E of this Element for a discussion of agencies and programs that serve special needs populations in Temecula. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-52 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Seniors Seniors are considered persons age 65 or older in this Housing Element. However, it must be noted that some funding programs have lower age limits for persons to be eligible for their senior housing projects. Seniors have special housing needs primarily resulting from physical disabilities and limitations, fixed or limited income, and health care costs. Additionally, senior households also have other needs to preserve their independence including supportive services to maintain their health and safety, in -home support services to perform activities of daily living, conservators to assist with personal care and financial affairs, public administration assistance to manage and resolve estate issues, and networks of care to provide a wide variety of services and daily assistance. Various portions of the Housing Element describe characteristics of the senior population, the extent of their needs for affordable housing, housing designated for seniors, and City provisions to accommodate their need. Senior household growth in Temecula from 2010 to 2018 is shown in Table 33. Table 33: Senior Population and Households (2010 and 2018) Population 2010 2018 Number 7,009 11,534 Percent Change - 64.6% Annual Percent Change - 8.1% Households 2010 2018 Number 3,694 5,983 Percent Change - 62.0% Annual Percent Change - 7.7% Source: HCD 2019 Mobile Home Pork Listings Ithe large increase in elderly persons is likely due to the residential growth experienced in Temecula as well as aging in place of Temecula's residents. Senior households increased by 62% from 2010 to 2018. While seniors represent approximately 10% of the City's population, senior households represent approximately 18% of total households, which is primarily due to the smaller senior household size. Table 34 summarizes senior households by age and tenure. The majority of senior households are owners, 4,835 or approximately 81%, whereas approximately 19% of senior households, 1,148, are renters. Temecula has a lower percentage of both owner -occupied elderly households than in Riverside County (14.3% vs. 20%) and renter - occupied elderly households (3.4% vs. 5.2%). Elderly renters tend to prefer affordable units in smaller single -story structures or multi -story CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-53 structures with an elevator, close to health facilities, services, transportation, and entertainment. During the planning period, senior households are anticipated to increase at a rate commensurate with overall population and household growth. Senior housing types can include market rate homes, senior single-family housing communities, senior apartments, and mobile homes. Table 34: Householder Age by Tenure (2018) Owners Renters Age Group Number Percent Number Percent 65-74 years 2,977 61.6% 809 70.5% 75-84 years 1,384 28.6% 239 20.8% 85 plus years 474 9.8% 100 8.7% TOTAL 80.8% 19.2% 4,835 1,148 (of total) (of total) Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS ("fable B25007) The median income of households with a head of household that is 65 years and over is $64,955, significantly less (36.4%) than the median household income of $90,964. Senior Housing There is increasing variety in the types of housing available to the senior population. This section focuses on three basic types. Independent Living — Housing for healthy seniors who are self- sufficient and want the freedom and privacy of their own separate apartment or house. Many seniors remain in their original homes, and others move to special residential communities which provide a greater level of security and social activities of a senior community. Group Living — Shared living arrangements in which seniors live in close proximity to their peers and have access to activities and special services. Assisted Living — Provides the greatest level of support, including meal preparation and assistance with other activities of daily living. Temecula permits residential care facilities serving six or fewer persons by right in all residential zones, and those serving more than six persons by conditional use permit in residential and commercial zones. The California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division reports that as of May 2021, 18 residential care facilities serve the elderly in Temecula. Seniors and their caregivers also utilize larger CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-54 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT scale residential care facilities for the elderly. There are four commercially operating assisted living residential care facilities for the elderly in the City: • Highgate Senior Living -Temecula, 42301 Moraga Rd. — assisted living facility offering memory care and couples care • Temecula Memory Care, 44280 Campanula Way — memory care facility • Vineyard Ranch at Temecula, 27350 Nicolas Rd. — assisted living community offering memory care services • The Chateau at Harveston, 40024 Harveston Dr. — senior independent living with additional third party services Several programs address the non -housing needs of seniors in Temecula. Additional support for senior residents is provided by the city -operated Mary Phillips Senior Center (MPSC), which serves as the primary site for senior services programs offered by the City and non- profits. Some of the programs and services provided at the MPSC include nutrition/meal programs, health screening and general medical exams, transportation programs, library and computers with internet access, and recreational activities. The City also partners with RTA to provide senior transportation services, including Dial -A -Ride, throughout Temecula. Disabled Persons A "disability" includes, but is not limited to, any physical or mental disability as defined in California Government Code Section 12926. A "mental disability" involves having any mental or psychological disorder or condition that limits a major life activity. A "physical disability" involves having any physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that affects body systems. In addition, a mental or physical disability limits a major life activity by making the achievement of major life activities difficult including physical, mental, and social activities and working. Physical, mental, and/or developmental disabilities could prevent a person from working, restrict a person's mobility, or make caring for oneself difficult. Therefore, disabled persons often require special housing needs related to potential limited earning capacity, the lack of accessible and affordable housing, and higher health costs associated with disabilities. Additionally, people with disabilities require a wide range of different housing, depending on the type and severity of their disability. Housing needs can range from institutional care facilities to facilities that support partial or full independence (i.e., group care CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-55 homes). Supportive services such as daily living skills and employment assistance need to be integrated in the housing situation. Individuals with a mobility, visual, or hearing limitation may require housing that is physically accessible. Examples of accessibility in housing include widened doorways and hallways, ramps, bathroom modifications (e.g., lowered countertops, grab bars, adjustable shower heads, etc.) and special sensory devices including smoke alarms and flashing lights. Individuals with self -care limitations (which can include persons with mobility difficulties) may require residential environments that include in -home or on -site support services ranging from congregate to convalescent care. Support services can include medical therapy, daily living assistance, congregate dining, and related services. • Individuals with developmental disabilities and other physical and mental conditions that prevent them from functioning independently may require assisted care or group home environments. • Individuals with disabilities may require financial assistance to meet their housing needs because a higher percentage than the population at large are low-income and their special housing needs are often costlier than conventional housing. According to the 2014-2018 ACS, there were 9,442 persons with one or more disabilities in Temecula. Of the disabled population, 62.8% were aged 5 to 64, 36.1% were aged 65 and over, and 1.2% were aged 5 and under. Table 35 identifies disabilities by type of disability. Table 35: Disabilities by Disability Type (2018) Persons Ages 5.64 Persons Ages 65+ Total Type of Disability Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Hearing Difficulty 1,393 23.5% 1,552 45.59% 2,991 31.7% Vision Difficulty 821 13.9% 591 17.36% 1,479 15.7% Cognitive Difficulty 2,796 47.2% 648 19.04% 3,444 36.5% Ambulatory Difficulty 1,835 31.0% 1,937 56.90% 3,772 39.9% Self -Care Difficulty 953 16.1% 741 21.77% 1,694 17.9% Independent Living Difficulty 1,628 27.5% 1,645 48.33% 3,273 34.7% Total Persons with One or 100% / 62.8% 100% / More Disabilities' 5,925 of disabled 3,404 36.1 % of 9,442 100% disabled 'A person may have more than one disability, so the total disabilities may exceed the total persons with a disability Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-56 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT As shown in Table 36, the 2014-2018 ACS indicates that for individuals between the ages of 16 and 64, approximately 2,562 persons had some form or type of disability and were not in the labor force. This indicates that their disability may impede their ability to earn an adequate income, which in turn could affect their ability to afford suitable housing accommodations to meet their special needs. Therefore, many in this group may be in need of housing assistance. Table 36: Disabled Persons by Employment Status (2018) Ages 16 to 64 Percent Employed with Disability 2,190 42.8% Unemployed with Disability 369 °o Not in Labor Force with Disability 2,562 500 Total 5,121 100% Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS While recent Census data does not provide income levels or overpayment data for persons with a disability, the 2014-2018 ACS survey does report on indicators that relate to a disabled person's or household's income. The 2014-2018 ACS data indicates that 733 persons with a disability are below the poverty level. It is likely that a portion of these disabled persons are in households that overpay for housing due to their limited income. The 2014-2018 ACS data indicates that 24.8% of households receiving food stamps or similar assistance have a disabled member. Of the 6,932 households with a disabled member, 447 households receive food stamps or similar assistance. The 2014-2018 ACS data indicates that the median earnings for males 16 years and over with a disability were $49,500 compared with $52,107 for males with no disability. Median earnings for females 16 years and over with a disability were $31,993 compared to $29,632 for females with no disability (which may be the result of disabled females receiving disability and SSI benefits). The persons in the "with a disability" category in Table 35 and Table 36 include persons with developmental disabilities. "Developmental disability" means "a disability that originates before an individual attains age 18 years, continues, or can be expected to continue, indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual." This term includes an intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, and disabling conditions found to be closely related to intellectual disabilities or to require treatment similar to that required for individuals with an intellectual disability, but does not include other handicapping conditions that are solely physical in nature. While the U.S. Census reports on a broad range of disabilities, the Census does not identify the subpopulation that has a developmental disability. The California Department of Developmental Services CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-57 (DDS) maintains data regarding people with developmental disabilities, defined as those with severe, life-long disabilities attributable to mental and/or physical impairments. The DDS data is reported by zip code, so the data reflects a larger area than the City of Temecula; however, the data was joined at the jurisdiction level by SCAG to approximate the counts for Temecula. The DDS/SCAG data indicates that 272 developmentally disabled persons reside in zip codes 92592, 92591, and 92590. Table 37 breaks down the developmentally disabled population by residence type. Of these persons, the majority (262) live at home with a parent or guardian and only 5 live independently. Table 37: Developmentally Disabled Persons by Residence Type (2018) Home of Parent/ Independent/ Community Intermediate Foster/ Family Supported Care Facility Care Facility Home Other TOTAL Guardian Living Temecula" 262 5 0 0 5 0 272 Data is jor the Temecula portion of zip codes 92592, 92591, and 92590 Sources: CA DDS, 2019; SCAG 6th Cycle Data Package Housing for Disabled Persons Households with a disabled member will require a mixture of housing units with accessibility features, in -home care, or group care housing facilities. Some of these households will have a member with a developmental disability and are expected to have special housing needs. Developmentally disabled persons may live with a family in a typical single-family or multifamily home, but some developmentally disabled persons with more severe disabilities may have special housing needs that may include extended family homes, group homes, small and large residential care facilities, intermediate care, and skilled nursing facilities and affordable housing such as extremely low/very low/low- income housing (both rental and ownership), Section 8/Housing Choice Vouchers, and single room occupancy -type units. Although there are no assisted living residential care facilities for adults with special needs, including physical, mental, and developmental disabilities in Temecula, there are a number of resources available throughout the County to serve the disabled residents of Temecula. Table 38 identifies some of the organizations in or near Temecula that specialize in providing services for the disabled and developmentally disabled population. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-58 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 38: Facilities and Services for Disabled Persons Organization Name Type of Service Provided Homeless Population Served Towards Maximum Independence (TMI) Employment and family support Disabled adults services California Department of Rehabilitation Vocational rehabilitation, independent living Developmentally disabled adults Coyne & Assoc. Early start, behavioral services for 12 months to 12 years children Goodwill Industries of the Inland Counties Vocational evaluation, training, and Adults with physical, psychiatric, and employment opportunities developmental disabilities Inland Respite, Inc. Caregivers and companion care Developmentally disabled adults Maxim Homecare Services Home healthcare, autism services Mentally disabled persons Project T.O.U.C.H. (Together Our Unity Shelter and homeless services Disabled adults Conquers Homelessness) CARE Learning Center and Counseling Educational and counseling services Disabled children and adults Services A.C.C.E.S.S. Therapeutic services Developmentally disabled children and adolescents Community Access Center (CAC) Advocacy, assistive technology Disabled adults The 2014-2018 ACS data indicates that for individuals between the ages of 5 and 64, approximately 1.6% of the total population of Temecula have an ambulatory difficulty, 0.7% have a vision difficulty, 1.2% have a hearing difficulty, and 1.5% have an independent living difficulty. These types of disabilities may impede their ability to find suitable housing accommodations to meet their special needs. Therefore, many in these groups may be in need of housing assistance. Households containing physically handicapped persons may also need housing with universal design measures or special features to allow better physical mobility for occupants. The 2014-18 ACS data also indicates that 6,932 households (20.5%) in Temecula had one or more disabled persons, including developmentally disabled persons. It is anticipated that this rate will remain the same during the planning period. Housing needed for persons with a disability during the planning period is anticipated to include community care facilities or at-home supportive services for persons with an independent living difficulty or self -care difficulty (approximately 4.9% of the population), as well as housing that is equipped to serve persons with ambulatory and sensory disabilities. Approximately 20.5% of the RHNA, 860 units, may be needed to have universal design measures or be accessible to persons with a disability. The City of Temecula is committed to improving the housing options for persons with special needs by proactively working with the development community. In 2015, a developer requesting a General CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-59 'A�NN�L� Plan change was required to offer construction options on the development in order to provide better for -sale options for those who may need unique construction requirements (in the special needs community), but cannot afford expensive retrofits of existing units. These options included: • Sound absorbent ceilings and walls • Tempered glass windows and mirrors • Natural light with sky lights or sun tubes • Clerestory lighting • Bathrooms with 4' tiled walls and flooring with floor drains • Bathroom plumbing with scaled prevention • Fiberglass and Dutch doors • Automatic swinging door operations • Pre -wiring for security systems • Wider doors Large Family Households Large family households are defined as households of five or more persons. Large family households are considered a special needs group because there is often a limited supply of adequately sized housing to accommodate their needs. The more persons in a household, the more rooms are needed to accommodate that household. Specifically, a five - person household would require three or four bedrooms, a six -person household would require four bedrooms, and a seven -person household would require four to six bedrooms. In Temecula, 5,273 households, 15.6% of all households, have five or more persons as described in Table 21. Of the large households, 65% own their home and 35% rent. Typically, there are more owner - occupied large households that are cost burdened when compared to renter households and the population as a whole. However, the 2014- 2018 ACS survey does not provide data regarding overpayment for large households. Table 39 compares the median income for households with five or more persons to the citywide median income for 201 S. For each large family category, the median household income was higher versus the citywide median of $90,964. Table 39: Median Income By Household Size (2018) Size Median Income 5-Person Households $109,958 6-Person Households $115,667 7 or More Person Households $113,556 Median Household Income (All Households) $90,964 Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-60 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Large families can have a difficult time finding housing units large enough to meet their needs. In Temecula, there appears to be a significant amount of both ownership housing and rental housing available to provide units with enough bedrooms for larger households. Table 40 identifies the number of large households by household size versus the number of large owner and rental units. While there are adequate units in Temecula to accommodate large owner and renter households, it does not mean that there is a match between housing units that exist and large families. As described in Table 20, 2% of owner -occupied homes and 4.7% of renter -occupied homes are overcrowded. Table 40: Household Size versus Bedroom Size by Tenure (2018) 5 Person Households 6 Person and Larger Households Tenure U BR 4+ BR Units Households Shortfall/ Households Shortfall/ Excess Excess Owner 8,416 2,300 6,116 12,265 1,128 11,137 Renter 3,177 1,334 1,843 3,076 511 2,565 Source: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS Large households require housing units with more bedrooms than housing units needed by smaller households. In general, housing for these households should provide safe outdoor play areas for children and should be located to provide convenient access to schools and child care facilities. These types of needs can pose problems particularly for large families that cannot afford to buy or rent single-family houses. Based on the proportion of the City's households that are at least five persons, it is anticipated that approximately 16% of the regional housing needs allocation units will be needed to accommodate large households and an emphasis should be placed on ensuring rental units are available to large households. Ingle Parent and Female Headed Households Single parent households are households with children under the age of 18 at home and include both male- and female -headed households. These households generally have a higher ratio between their income and their living expenses (that is, living expenses take up a larger share of income than is generally the case in two -parent households). Therefore, finding affordable, decent, and safe housing is often more difficult for single parent and female -headed households. Additionally, single parent and female -headed households have special needs involving access to daycare or childcare, health care, and other supportive services. While the majority of households in Temecula are either two -spouse couples or single person households, 20.5% of family households are CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-61 headed by a single male or single female. There are 1,393 male heads of household with no wife present and 581 of these households have children under 18. There is a larger number of female householders with no husband present — 4,296 households or 15.5% of family households — and 2,488 of these female -headed households have children under 18. Table 41 identifies single parent households by gender of the householder and presence of children. The median income of female -headed households (no husband present) is $53,651, 23.8% less than the median income of a male - headed, no wife present family ($70,432) and 41% less than the median income of all households in the City ($90,964). Approximately 4.8% of all households are under the poverty level; 26.4% of female -headed households with related children under 18 are under the poverty level. Table 41: Families and Female Householder with Children Under 18 (2018) Category Number Percent Total Families 27,657 100% Male householder, no wife present 1,393 5% With children under 18 581 2% Female householder, no husband present 4,296 15.5% With children under 18 2,488 9% Source: US Census, 20/4-201SACS As Temecula's population and households grow, there will be a continued need for supportive services for single parent households with children present. To address both the housing and supportive services needs of single parent households, additional multifamily housing should be developed that includes childcare facilities (allowing single parents to actively seek employment). In addition, the creation of innovative housing for female -headed households could include co -housing developments where childcare and meal preparation responsibilities can be shared. The economies of scale available in this type of housing would be advantageous to this special needs group as well as all other low-income household groups. Limited equity cooperatives sponsored by non-profit housing developers are another financing structure that could be considered for the benefit of all special needs groups. Farmworkers Farmworkers are traditionally defined as persons whose primary incomes are earned through permanent or seasonal agricultural labor. Agricultural lands have historically been one of Riverside County's most important land uses and agriculture continues to play a large role in the local economy. While Riverside County has recently experienced CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-62 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT an unprecedented level of population growth leading to a more diverse economic base that includes manufacturing, technology, and service - oriented sectors, it remains strongly tied to an agricultural base. Nonetheless, there are only two very minor agricultural operations in the City and no agricultural zoning district exists although agricultural uses are permitted in the residential districts. Despite this fact, the 2014-2018 ACS data estimates that only 228 (0.4% of the working population) of Temecula's residents were employed in agriculture (or related industries — forestry, fishing and hunting, mining) in 2018. It is possible (although statistics are not available) that the number of residents employed in agriculture as opposed to those employed in forestry, fishing and hunting, or mining is smaller than 228. In addition, it is possible (although statistics are not available) that a number of active farmworkers are not full-time residents of Temecula, and migrate into the area depending on seasonal crop harvest. Such farmworkers may find temporary housing by living with relatives, or short-term rental of a single unit for several families, resulting in overcrowded conditions. Homeless Persons Government Code Section 65583(a)(7) requires that the Housing Element include an analysis of the needs of homeless persons and families. Homeless persons are defined as those who lack a fixed and adequate residence. People who are homeless may be chronically homeless (perhaps due to substance abuse or mental health issues) or situationally homeless (perhaps resulting from job loss or family strife). Homeless people face critical housing challenges due to their very low incomes and lack of appropriate housing. Thus, State law requires jurisdictions to plan to help meet the needs of their homeless populations. The law also requires that each jurisdiction address community needs and available resources for special housing opportunities known as transitional and supportive housing. These housing types provide the opportunity for families and individuals to "transition" from a homeless condition to permanent housing, often with the assistance of supportive services to assist individuals in gaining necessary life skills in support of independent living. Homeless Estimates Counting the homeless population is problematic due to their transient nature; however, through the efforts of the Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) estimates have been developed. The Riverside County CoC is a consortium of individuals and organizations with the common purpose of developing and implementing a strategy CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-63 to address homelessness in Riverside County. The Riverside County CoC is responsible for managing U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds for homelessness, and is uniquely positioned to identify system needs and take steps to address them with the collaboration and partnership of community stakeholders. As the primary coordinating body for homeless issues and assistance for the entire County, the Riverside County CoC accomplishes a host of activities and programs vital to the County, including an annual point -in -time "snapshot" survey to identify and assess the needs of both the sheltered and unsheltered homeless. Riverside County's 2020 Point -in -Time (PIT) Count was conducted on January 29, 2020 and was planned, coordinated, and carried out by County agencies, city municipalities, non-profit service providers, and volunteers, including those experiencing homelessness. The 2020 PIT Count identified 59 people in the City of Temecula experiencing homelessness, representing 2.0% of Riverside County's total homeless count (2,884 individuals). For Riverside County, an estimated 729 (25.3%) of the 2,884 homeless individuals were sheltered and an estimated 2,155 (75%) were unsheltered. The 59 people identified in Temecula were unsheltered. Housing Accomm oda dons The Temecula Zoning Code allows emergency shelters by right in the Medium Density Residential and High Density Residential zones, subject to compliance with objective standards consistent with the requirements identified in Government Code Section 65583(a)(4). Emergency shelters are also permitted by way of conditional use permit in all other residential zones and in all commercial, office, and industrial districts. Likewise, transitional and supportive housing are allowed by right in the Medium Density Residential and High Density Residential zones and subject only to the same requirements for residential uses of the same type (e.g., single-family or multifamily) in the same zone. Transitional and supportive housing are also permitted by way of conditional use permit in all other residential zones and in all commercial, office, and industrial districts. Housing Program 16 will amend the Zoning Code to ensure that the Code complies with SB 745 and allows transitional and supportive housing by right in all zones allowing residential uses and are not subject to any restrictions (e.g., occupancy limit) not imposed on similar dwellings in the same zone. The Housing Plan includes policies and programs directed to encourage the provision of housing and services for the homeless population as well as persons and households at risk of homelessness. There are two emergency shelters operating in the City — Project T.O.U.C.H. (130 beds) and Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission. CITY OF TEMECULA GLNERAL PLAN HBK-64 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Furthermore, Temecula supports a regional effort to provide emergency shelters and transitional and supportive housing among the various local agencies making up the Riverside County CoC. The most recent inventory of resources available within Riverside County for emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing units comes from the 2020 Housing Inventory reported to HUD by the Riverside County CoC. Table 42 shows the total beds offered by homeless facilities in the Riverside County CoC area. Table 42: Homeless Facilities (2020)* Facility Type Riverside City & County CoC Family Units Family Beds Adult -Only Beds Total Year -Round Beds Emergency Shelter 80 310 505 839 Transitional Housing 11 42 50 92 Permanent Supportive Housing 112 414 1,330 1,744 Rapid Re -Housing 69 238 80 318 TOTAL UNITS/BEDS 272 1,004 1,965 2,993 *Numbers are for the total Riverside County Continuum of Care region for which Temecula is a participating member Source: HUD 2020 Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs, Housing Inventory Count Report Emergency Shelters — An emergency shelter is defined as housing with minimal supportive services for homeless persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less. Furthermore, no individual or household may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay. • Transitional Housing — Sometimes referred to as "bridge" housing, provides housing accommodations and support services for persons and families, but restricts occupancy to no more than 24 months. In the Riverside County CoC region, a total of 92 transitional housing beds are provided. • Permanent Supportive Housing — Supportive housing has no limit on length of stay and is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist residents in retaining the housing, improving their health status, and maximizing their ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. A total of 1,744 permanent housing beds are provided in the Riverside County CoC region. • Rapid Re -Housing — Rapid re -housing provides short-term rental assistance and services. The goals are to help people obtain housing quickly, increase self-sufficiency, and stay housed. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-65 A network of local and regional service providers operates a number of programs to serve the needs of varied homeless subpopulations. Table 43 provides a list of emergency and transitional shelters and available services for the homeless population in and around Temecula. Table 43: Facilities and Services for the Homeless Organization Name Type of Service Provided Homeless Population Number of Beds Served Transitional housing, Project TOUCH - Temecula All 215 emergency shelter Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission - Temecula Emergency shelter All N.A. People with substance Transitional housing, abuse problems, 80 men; Set Free Ranch - Lake Elsinore substance abuse counseling People with mental 30 women illness, domestic - violence survivors Transitional housing, Salvation Army Emergency Shelter - Hemet All N.A. emergency shelter Valley Restart Shelter - Hemet Emergency shelter, All 35 Interfaith Community Services Coastal Service Transitional and permanent AII, Center - Oceanside housing, emergency shelter, Veterans 49+ employment development Operation HOPE - Vista Emergency shelter Women and families N.A. Jericho House Transitional hou ' g Men with substance N.A. abuse problems Social Work Action Group (SWAG) 90-day stabilization program Substance Problems 20 Assessment ofNeed Based on the available information, there is a countywide homeless population of 2,884 persons and 2,993 beds, indicating sufficient supply for homeless persons. It is noted that the 2020 point -in -time survey identified 729 sheltered homeless persons and 2,155 unsheltered homeless persons. The discrepancy between sheltered homeless persons and the county's total capacity to house homeless persons indicates a need for additional community services resources to assist n%\,3 and match the homeless population with the countywide shelter and housing resources. I. Units at Risk of Conversion Assisted Housing at Risk of Conversion California housing element law requires jurisdictions to provide an analysis of low-income, assisted multifamily housing units that are eligible to change from low-income housing uses during the next 10 years (2021-2031) due to termination of subsidy contracts, mortgage prepayment, or expiration of restrictions on use (Government Code CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-66 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT 65583). These units risk the termination of various subsidy groups which could convert certain multifamily housing from affordable to market rate. State law requires housing elements to assess at -risk housing in order to project any potential loss of affordable housing. The California Housing Partnership (CHP) provides data on assisted housing units, including those in Temecula. Table 44 indicates the extent of subsidized multifamily rental housing in the City, the subsidy programs that are in place for each project, and the likelihood of current housing assisted projects to convert to market rate projects that would not provide assistance to lower income residents. Table 44: Summary of at -Risk Subsidized Housing Units Project/Address No. & Type of Type of Subsidy Current Owner Earliest Date of Risk Units Conversion Cameron Historical Building 41925 5th St. 24 Family RDA Loan WINCHESTER 12 2062 Low PARTNERS LP Temecula CA 92590 Cottages of Old Town Individual Property Address Varies 17 RDA Loan Owners 2047 Low LIHTC Creekside Apts. reek idePujis 48 Section 515, RC Investment Group 2040 Low Section 538, A — California LP Temecula CA 92590 Section 521 Front Street Plaza 28693 Old Town Front St. 23 Family & RDA Loan FRONT STREET 2069 Low Seniors PLAZA PARTNERS Temecula CA 92590 FT-02-029 32504 Strigel Court 1 LIHTC Individual Property 2027 Moderate Owner Temecula CA 92592 Habitat I & II 9 Land/Cash Individual Property 2047 Low Contribution Owners Madera Vista Apts. Summerhouse 44155 Margarita Rd. 110 Family & LIHTC Housing Associates 2068 Low Seniors LP Temecula CA 92592 Mission Village Apts. 28497 Pujol St. 75 Family LIHTC Affirmed Housing 2029 Moderate Group Temecula CA 92590 LIHTC Oaktree Apts. 42176 Lyndie Ln. 39 Family Section 5, Highland Property 2040 Low Section 53838, Development Temecula CA 92591 Section 521 Palomar Building 41955 5th St. 22 Family RDA Loan CROSSROADS AT 2062 Low WINCHESTER Temecula CA 92590 Portola Terrace Apts. 28701 Pujol St. 44 Family & Seniors LIHTC AMCAL Pujol Fund LP 2067 Low Temecula CA 92590 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-67 Rancho California Apts. 29210 Stonewood Rd. Temecula CA 54 Family LIHTC Rancho California LP 2067 Low 92591 Rancho West Apts. 42200 Main St. 150 Family RDA Loan WESTMINSTER 2708 2026 High HOLDING Temecula CA 92590 Rancho Creek Apts. 28464 Felix Valdez Rd. Temecula CA 30 Family RDA Loan 1717 SUNDSRT PLAZA 2026 High 92590 Riverbank Apts./Pujol Street Senior Apartments Corp for Better 28500 Pujol St. 65 Senior LIHTC Housing 2058 Low Temecula CA 92590 Temecula Reflections (Temecula Lane) Builder Individual Property 31111 Black Maple Dr. 11 Family Financed/Develo Owners 2065 Low pment Rights Temecula CA 92592 Warehouse at Creekside Apts. 42081 3rd St. 32 Family RDA Loan WAREHOUSE AT 2065 Low CREEKSIDE Temecula CA 92590 Sources: California Housing Partnership, May 2021; National Housing Partnership Database, 2021 Preservation Options qN Depending on the circumstances of the at -risk projects, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units. The following discussion highlights ways that the City's at -risk units could be preserved as affordable housing. All of the presented alternatives are costly and beyond the ability of the City of Temecula to manage without large amounts of subsidy from federal and/or state resources. Replacement Through New Construction The construction of new lower income housing units is a means of replacing the at -risk units should they be converted to market rate. The cost of developing new housing depends on a variety of factors such as density, size of units, location and related land costs, and type of construction. Assuming an average development cost of $143,000 per unit for multifamily rental housing (1,200 square foot unit), replacement of the 180 high at -risk units would require approximately $25.7 million dollars, excluding land costs, which vary depending upon location. Purchase ofReplacement Units One preservation option is for a non-profit organization to purchase similar units. By purchasing similar units, a non-profit organization can secure lower -income restrictions and potentially enable the project to become eligible for a greater range of governmental assistance. The CITY OF TEMECULA GLNEKAL PLAN HBK-68 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT cost of purchasing similar units depends on a number of factors, including the market conditions at the time, occupancy rate, and physical conditions of the units to be acquired. Current market value for the at -risk units is estimated on the basis of the units' potential annual income, and operating and maintenance expenses. The actual market value at time of sale would depend on market and property conditions, lease-out/turnover rates, among other factors. Purchase ofAffordability Covenants Another option to preserve the affordability of at -risk projects is to provide an incentive package to the owners to maintain the projects as affordable housing. Incentives could include writing down the interest rate on the remaining loan balance, and/or supplementing the subsidy amount received to market levels. To purchase the affordability covenant on these projects, an incentive package should include interest subsidies at or below what the property owners can obtain in the open market. To enhance the attractiveness of the incentive package, the interest subsidies may need to be combined with rent subsidies that supplement the HUD fair market rent levels. Rental Assistance Tenant -based rent subsidies could be used to preserve the affordability of housing. Similar to Housing Choice Vouchers, the City, through a variety of potential funding sources, could provide rent subsidies to very low-income households. The level of the subsidy required to preserve the at -risk units is estimated to equal the Fair Market Rent (FMR) for a unit minus the housing cost affordable by a very low- income household. �\ J. Estimates of Housing Need Several factors influence the degree of demand, or "need," for housing in Temecula. The major needs categories considered in this Element include: • Housing needs resulting from the overcrowding of units • Housing needs that result when households pay more than they can afford for housing CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-69 Housing needs of "special needs groups" such as elderly, large families, female -headed households, households with a disabled person, farmworkers, and the homeless State law requires that cities quantify existing housing need in their Housing Element. Table 45 summarizes the findings. Table 45: Summary of Needs Summary of Households/Persons with Identified Housing Need Percent of Total Population/Households Households Overpaying for Housing: Renter Households Overpaying 11.3% of households Owner Households Overpaying 6.7% of households Extremely Low-income Households (0-30% AMI) Overpaying 4.8% of households Very Low-income Households (0-30% AMI) Overpaying 5.5% of households Low-income Households (0-30% AMI) Overpaying 7.7% of households Overcrowded Households: Overcrowded Renter Households 1.6% of households Overcrowded Owner Households 1.3% of households All Overcrowded Households 2.9% of households Special Needs Groups: Elderly Households 17.7% of households Disabled Persons 8.5% of pop. Developmentally Disabled Persons 0.2% of pop. Large Households 15.6% of households Female Headed Households 12.7% of households Female Headed Households with Children 7.3% of households Farmworkers 0.2% of pop. Homeless 0.05% of pop. Affordable Housing Units At Risk of Conversion to Market Rate Costs 180 units Sources: US Census, 2014-2018 ACS; Riverside County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-70 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT IV. CONSTRAINTS ON HOUSING PRODUCTION Constraints to housing development are defined as government measures or non -government conditions that limit the amount or timing of residential development. Government regulations can potentially constrain the supply of housing available in a community if the regulations limit the opportunities to develop housing, impose requirements that unnecessarily increase the cost to develop housing, or make the development process so arduous as to discourage housing developers. State law requires housing elements to contain an analysis of the governmental constraints on housing maintenance, improvement, and development (Government Code, Section 65583(a) (4)). Non -governmental constraints (required to be analyzed under Government Code, Section 65583(a) (5)) cover land prices, construction costs, and financing. While local governments cannot control prices or costs, identification of these constraints can be helpful to Temecula in formulating housing programs. A. Potential Non -Governmental Constraints The City of Temecula takes a number of proactive steps to address non -governmental constraints. This includes implementing the City's Affordable Housing Overlay, providing a fee deferral/reimbursement program, and streamlining processes. Temecula provides a free pre - application process where a developer can receive no cost feedback from all City departments during conceptual, due diligence, and pre - submittal timeframes. Many cities charge thousands of dollars for this process, which adds to development costs and potentially discourages developers from evaluating projects. The City's digital review is another developer friendly process that is minimizing time and reducing costs for the development community. Prior to COVID-19, the City undertook extensive information system upgrades to enable digital reviews. The cost savings add up quickly, with printing cost and permit running costs reaching well over $10,000 just for printing. Temecula hosts Temecula Trekkers (annually), a multi -day educational session, that educates real estate agents on the Planning Department and provides a direct liaison for future projects. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-71 1. Land and Construction Costs A major cost associated with developing new housing is the cost of land. Most vacant residential parcels in Temecula have been subdivided, while others are contained within planned communities. The cost of to develop housing is influenced by the cost of the raw land, the cost of holding the land during the development process, and the cost of providing services to meet City standards for development. The cost of raw land is influenced by variables such as scarcity, location, availability of public utilities, zoning, general plan designation, and unique features like trees, water frontage, views, and adjoining uses. A review of lots for sale and recently sold indicates that land prices range from approximately $20,000 to $80,000 per acre for land approved for residential development based on a review of Zillow and Loopnet listings. Construction cost is determined primarily by the cost of labor and materials. The relative importance of each is a function of the complexity of the construction job and the desired quality of the finished product. As a result, builders are under constant pressure to complete a job for as low a price as possible while still providing a quality product. This pressure has led (and is still leading) to an emphasis on labor-saving materials and construction techniques. The International Code Council JCC) provides estimates for the average cost of labor and materials for typical Type VA protected wood -frame housing. Estimates are based on "good -quality" construction, providing for materials and fixtures well above the minimum required by state and local building codes. In the 2020 edition of the Building Safety Journal, the ICC estimated that the average per square -foot cost for good -quality housing in the region was approximately $118 for multi -family housing, $131 for single-family homes, and $148 for residential care/assisted living facilities. Although construction costs are a substantial portion of the overall development cost, they are consistent throughout the region and therefore are not considered a major constraint to housing production. The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic social distancing guidelines may increase constructions costs for an unknown period. Construction cost increases, like land cost increases, affect the ability of consumers to pay for housing. Construction cost increases occur due to the cost of materials, labor, and higher government imposed standards (e.g., energy conservation requirements). The development community is currently producing market rate for -sale housing that is affordable to moderate and above moderate income households. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-72 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT 2. Availability of Financing Financing is critical to the housing market. Developers require construction financing, and buyers require permanent financing. The two principal ways in which financing can serve as a constraint to new residential development are the availability and cost of construction financing and the availability and cost of permanent financing. • If financing is not easily available, then more equity may be required for developing new projects and fewer homebuyers can purchase homes, since higher down payments are required. • Higher construction period interest rates for developers result in higher development costs. For homebuyers, higher interest rates translate into higher mortgage payments (for the same loan amount), and therefore reduces the purchasing power of homebuyers. On February 25, 2021, the reported average rate for a 30-year mortgage was 2.97% with 0.6 points (FreddieMac, 2019). From 2005 through 2021, average monthly mortgage rates have ranged from a high of 6.76% in July 2006 to today's record lows. For homebuyers, it is necessary to pay a higher down payment than in the immediate past, and demonstrate credit worthiness and adequate incomes, so that loan applications meet standard underwriting criteria. While adherence to strict underwriting criteria was not required during the early and mid- 2000s, the return to stricter standards is consistent with loan standards prior to 2001. 3. Affordable Housing Development Constraints In addition to the constraints to market rate housing development discussed above, affordable housing projects face additional constraints. While there is a range of sites available for potential affordable housing projects, as well as projects that focus on special needs populations, financial assistance for the development of affordable housing is limited and highly competitive. Multiple funding sources are needed to construct an affordable housing project, since substantial subsidies are required to make the units affordable to extremely low, very low, and low income households. It is not unusual to see five or more financing sources required to make a project financially feasible. Each of these sources may have different requirements and application deadlines, and some sources may require that the project has already successfully secured financing commitments. Since financing is so critical and is also generally competitive, organizations and agencies that provide funding often can effectively dictate the type and sizes of projects. Thus, in some years senior housing may be favored by financing programs, while in other CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-73 years family housing may be preferred. Target income levels can also vary from year to year. This situation has worsened in recent years. Federal and state funding has decreased and limited amounts of housing funds are available and the process to obtain funds is extremely competitive. Tax credits, often a fundamental source of funds for affordable housing, are no longer selling on a one for one basis. In other words, once a project has received authorization to sell a specified amount of tax credits to equity investors, the investors are no longer purchasing the credits at face value, but are purchasing them at a discount. (Tax credits are not worth as much to investors if their incomes have dropped.) 4. Building Permit Timing Typically, single family home developers apply for the first building permits for a subdivision upon receipt of a grading permit. For simple projects or projects that must remain static in their design, building permits may be processed concurrently with grading plan reviews. Building permits typically take 60-90 days, assuming two to three plan checks. Building permits can be issued in as few as 30 days if there are no corrections, but this is rarely the case for residential subdivisions or multifamily projects. Typically, it takes approximately 6-18 months between approval of a project and request for/issuance of building permits. This varies widely depending on the complexity of the project and required permits or environmental review. B. Governmental Constraints Housing affordability is affected by factors in both the private and public sectors. Actions by the City can have an impact on the price and availability of housing in Temecula. Land use controls, site improvement requirements, building codes, fees, and other local programs intended to improve the overall quality of housing may serve as a constraint to housing development. These governmental constraints can limit the operations of the public, private, and nonprofit sectors, making it difficult to meet the demand for affordable housing and limiting supply in a region. All City zoning, development standards, specific plans, and fees are posted online and available to the public, consistent with the requirements of AB 1483. 1. Land Use Controls The Land Use Element of the Temecula General Plan and corresponding Development Code provide for a range of residential types and densities dispersed throughout the City. Maximum residential densities, in terms of dwelling units per acre (DU/Ac), in Temecula cover a wide spectrum, including the following categories: CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-74 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT • Hillside Residential (HR) (0.1 DU/Ac) • Rural (RR) (0.2 DU/Ac) • Very Low Density Residential (VL) (0.4 DU/Ac) • Low Density Residential-1 (L-1) (2 DU/Ac) • Low Medium Density Residential (LM) (6 DU/Ac) • Medium Density Residential (M) (12 DU/Ac) • High Density Residential (H) (20 DU/Ac) These residential categories provide for a range of housing types to be developed in Temecula. The City has also set target density levels for the following residential uses: • Very Low Density Residential (VL,) (0.3 DU/Ac) • Low Density Residential-1 (L-1) (1.5 DU/Ac) • Low Medium Density Residential (LM) (4.5 DU/Ac) Target density levels are used in projecting future development. The target density establishes a ceiling within the range which cannot be exceeded without Planning Commission/City Council approval. Targets of 10 DU/Ac for Medium Density Residential and 16.5 DU/Ac for High Density Residential are shown in Table LU-1 of the Land Use Element. These numbers are for analysis and are used when calculating maximum allowable density bonuses. However, projects that provide amenities or public benefits will be allowed to exceed the target level. For example, affordable housing is considered a public benefit and is therefore not subject to the established target density level of 10 DU/Ac for Medium Density Residential and 16.5 DU/Ac for High Density Residential. Other types of amenities or public benefits may include providing road connections, parks, or a fire station. These amenities typically apply to large-scale planned development projects. In addition, the Land Use Element includes a Mixed -Use Overlay that adds residential uses to permitted uses and increases the maximum density and target floor -to -area ratio (FAR). As stated in the General Plan Land Use Element, for each area, a daily trip cap is defined, based on the maximum number of daily trips permitted. Within the daily trip cap for each area, flexible, high -quality design and creative mixes of adjacent uses are encouraged. Development project proposals that exceed the specified trip caps will not be approved. Residential densities would average approximately 28 units per net acre. According CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-75 to the Land Use Element, the total number of units possible in Mixed - Use Overlay areas ranges from approximately 1,173 to 2,348 units. The trip caps for each Mixed Use Overlay area are as follows: Area 1 — 15,000 trips; Area 2 — 30,000 trips; Area 3 — 6,000 trips. The total number of trips, 51,000, is equivalent to 8,500 residential dwelling units (at 6 trips per unit for high -density residential development), or 102 acres of commercial development (at 500 trips per acre), or a combination of the two. Approved and Built Densities While the City's regulations identify minimum and maximum densities that may be developed in the City (exclusive of most Specific Plans, including Old Town, Altair, and Harveston), individual developers may opt to build at the lower, mid -range, or higher end of allowed densities. Recent projects in Temecula that are built or are under construction are consistent with the densities anticipated by the City's General Plan, Specific Plans, and Zoning Code and typically built within 5% of the maximum allowable density. The City has received feedback from the development community that the maximum density levels are realistic and achievable, and the City expects to continue to see projects built at or around the maximum allowable density. 2. Residential Development Standards Temecula's residential development and parking standards are summarized in Tables 46 and 47. Residential standards have been adopted by the City to protect the safety and welfare of Temecula residents. The Development Code and General Plan allow for modification and flexibility in the development standards through the provision of a Mixed -Use Overlay, Village Center Overlay, Affordable Housing Overlay, and Planned Development Overlay. Flexibility in planning for overlay areas is allowed to promote a greater range of housing opportunities within the City, promote development of affordable housing options, and affirmatively further fair housing. Diversity of housing, including affordable housing, is one of the performance standards for the Village Center Overlay and is a central component of the City's Affordable Housing Overlay. The Planned Development Overlay zoning district also encourages the provision of additional housing opportunities for the community. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-76 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 46: Residential Development Standards HR RR VL L-1 L-2 LM M NC CC HT PO SP PDO H4 HR-SM Minimum Net Lot — — — — — 7,200 7,200 30,000 30,000 20,000 40,000 For SP- — — Area (square feet) 5, see Minimum Average 10 acres 5 acres 2.5 acres 1.0 acre 0.5 acres — — - _ - - Table H- _ 10 acres Net Lot Area per 26A. For See Dwelling Unit all TableTable Density Range <0.1 0.1- 0.2- 0.5- 0.5- 3.0-6.9 7.0-12.9 20.05 30.05 30.05 30.05 others, of refer H-26B 13.0- <0.1 (Dwelling Units per 0.2 0.4 2.9 2.9 individual 20.0 Net Acre)' specific plans. Lot Dimensions Minimum Lot 50 ft. 50 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 50 ft. Frontage at Front Property Line For SP- Minimum Lot 40 ft. 40 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 5, see 20 ft. 40 ft. Frontage for a Flag Table H- Lot at Front 26 For Property Line . See Minimum Width at 100 ft. 100 ft. 100 ft. 70 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. 40 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. 80 ft. 80 ft. others, Table H-266 30 ft. 100 ft. Required Front refer to Setback Area individual Minimum Average 100 ft. 100 ft. 80 ft. 70 ft. 60 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. - _ - - specific 50 ft. 100 ft. Width plans. Minimum Lot 150 ft. 150 ft. 120 ft. 100 ft. 90 ft. 80 ft. 80 ft. 100 ft. 100 ft. 100 ft. 120 ft. 100 ft. 150 ft. Depth Setbacks Minimum Front 40 ft. 40 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft. Z 10 ft. 2 10 ft. 2 - - - - For SP- 20 ft. 2 40 ft. Yard 5, see Minimum Corner 40 ft. 40 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. - _ _ - Table H- 15 ft. 40 ft. Side Yard 26A. For See Minimum Interior 25 ft. 25 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. Variable3 Variable3 0 0 0 0 all others, Table Variable3 25 ft. Side Yard3 refer to H-26B Minimum Rear 25 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. individual 20 ft. 25 ft. Yard specific plans. Other Requirements — l I I l O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N H-77 HR RR VL L-1 L-2 LM M NC CC HT PO SP PDO H4 HR-SM Maximum Height 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 40 ft. 35 ft. 50 ft. 75 ft. 75 ft. For SP- 50 ft. 2 floors, 5, see 30-40 ft. Table H- from 26A. For See foundation Maximum % of Lot 10% 15% 20% 25% 25% 35% 35% 25% 30% 30% 50% others, allTableTable 30% 2 floors, Coverage refer to H-26B 30-40 ft. individual from specific foundation plans. Open Space 90 % 75% 70 % 60% 40% 25% 25% 25% 20% 20% 25% For SP- 30% 2 floors, Required 5, see 30-40 ft. Table H- from 26A. For foundation all Private Open NA NA NA NA NA NA 200 NA NA NA NA others, 150 2 floors, Space Per Unit refer to 30-40 ft. individual from specific foundation plans. SOURCE: The City of Temecula Municipal Code, Sections 17.06.040 and 17.06.080. Accessed June 2021. Notes: 1. Affordable housing and congregate care facilities may exceed the stated densities pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.10.020M. 2. In the H residential zoning district, dwelling units with entrances that have direct access to the street, such that the predominant features of the home fronting the street are the windows and the front door, may have a minimum setback of 15 feet. 3. In order to allow for more flexible site planning, variable interior yard setback for both sides must equal at least LM zoning district: The combined interior side yard setback for both sides must equal at least 15 feet. One side shall have at least 5 feet and the other side shall have at least 10 feet and shall be located on the same side as the driveway to provide for potential vehicular access to the rear of the property. M and H zoning districts: The combined interior side yard setbacks shall not be less than 10 feet. This is intended to permit a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side yard and 10 feet on the opposite side yard. 4. Except as otherwise stated in the Temecula Municipal Code, the objective standards and regulations applicable to multifamily projects in the high density residential zoning district, as outlined in Chapter 17.06, shall apply to all projects developed pursuant to the Affordable Housing Overlay. 5. As allowed by the Affordable Housing Overlay. 0 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-78 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 47: Residential Development Standards - Old Town Specific Plan District DTC RILMU NR Minimum Net Lot Area (square feet) 3,500 3,125 3,750 Minimum Average Net Lot Area per Dwelling Unit _ - _ Maximum Dwelling Units Per Acre' 70 70 35 Lot Dimensions Minimum Lot Frontage at Front Property Line 25 25 50 Minimum Lot Frontage for a Flag Lot at Front Property Line - - - Minimum Width at Required Front Setback Area 10 10 Minimum Average Width - - - Minimum Lot Depth 140 125 75 Setbacks Minimum Front Yard 20 20 20 Minimum Corner Side Yard - - 5 Minimum Interior Side Yard - - 5 Minimum Rear Yard 5 5 10 Other Requirements Maximum Height 50 50 50 Maximum % of Lot Coverage - - - Open Space Required - - - Private Open Space Per Unit 75-100 50-75 100 SOURCE: City Of Temecula, Old Town Specific Plan Notes: Rear yard setback is 0 feet where an alley occurs, or 5 feet in NR District. C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N H-79 Table 48: Residential Development Standards - Planning Development Overlays PDO-2 PDO-5 PDO-6 PDO-7 PDO- PDO- PDO- 10 11 12 Minimum Net Lot Area (square feet) 2,700 - 40,000 7,200 7,000 2,400 4,500 Minimum Average Net Lot Area per Dwelling 2,400 - - - - - - Unit Maximum Dwelling Units Per Acre 20 - - 12 10 2 Lot Dimensions Minimum Lot Frontage at Front Property Line 30 ft. - 60 ft. 30 ft. - - Minimum Lot Frontage for a Flag Lot at Front 12 ft. - - 20 ft. - Property Line Minimum Width at Required Front Setback 40 ft. - 80 ft. 40 ft. - - - Area Minimum Average Width 40 ft. - - 50 ft. 50 ft. 40 ft. 45 ft. Minimum Lot Depth 55 ft. - 120 ft. 80 ft. 100 ft. 60 ft. 100 ft. Setbacks Minimum Front Yard 8 ft. 45 ft.' 20 ft.' 10 ft. - 5 ft. 15 ft. Minimum Corner Side Yard 0 ft. 45 ft.' - 15 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. Minimum Interior Side Yard 0 ft. 45 ft.' 10 ft. - 5 ft. 5 ft. Minimum Rear Yard 5 ft. 45 ft.' 10 ft. 20 ft. 10 ft. 20 ft. Landscape Setback - 25 ft. - - - - Other Requirements Maximum Height 35 ft. 28 ft./40 40 ft. 40 ft. 50 ft. 25 ft. 35 ft. ft.3 Maximum % of Lot Coverage 50% - 50% 35% 50% - - Floor Area Ratio - 1.004 - - - - - Open Space Required 30% - 25% 25% 20% Private Open Space Per Unit 120 sf - - 200 sf 200 sf SOURCE: City of Temecula Municipal Code, Sections 17.22. Accessed June 2021. Notes: For Sub Area C along the eastern and southerly property line. A minimum 25-foot landscape buffer setback from the property line shall be provided in Sub Areas A and B along Rancho California Road and between Sub Area A and existing residential development to the east. 28 feet and 1 story in Sub Area A; 40 feet and 3 stories in Sub Area C. Maximum floor area ratio (with bonuses). Target floor area ratio is .50 10 feet on service and access roads and 25 feet adjacent to residentially zoned property. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-80 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 49: Parking Space Requirements Land Use Required Parking Spaces Single -Family Unit Duplex, Triplex Multi -Family Units (12 units or less) — 3 or fewer bedrooms Multi -Family Units (13 or more units) Mobile Home Park Accessory Dwelling Units 2 enclosed spaces 2 covered spaces/units, plus 1 guest space/4 units 2-5 units: 2 covered spaces/units, plus 2 guest spaces per project 6-12 units: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus 3 guest spaces 1 covered parking space plus 0.5 uncovered parking space for 1 bedroom units. In addition, 1 guest space for every 6 units 1 covered parking space plus 1 uncovered parking space for 2 bedroom units. In addition, 1 guest space for every 6 units 2 covered parking spaces and 0.5 uncovered parking space for three bedroom (or more) units. In addition, 1 guest space for every 6 units A minimum of 4 guest spaces is required for all multifamily residential with 13 or more units 1 covered space/trailer site, plus 1 guest space/2 trailer sites 1 parking space per newly constructed detached ADU except as otherwise provided in Chapter 17.23. The parking space may be provided as tandem parking on the driveway Senior Citizens Housing Complex/Congregate % covered space/unit, plus 1 Care uncovered guest space per 5 units Congregate Care Housing '/2 covered space/unit, plus 1 4 uncovered guest space per 5 units SOURCE: City of Temecula Development Code, 2021. Additional flexibility in development standards is also provided in the Development Code through the use of variable setbacks. This flexibility allows for creative site planning, especially for irregular sites. For example, the City adopted a Planned Development Overlay district for the Temecula Creek Village project to provide for mixed -use commercial/residential development. Residential uses for the Planned Development Overlay district include medium- and high -density muld- family uses. Affordable Housing Opportunities To provide additional opportunities for affordable housing, the Development Code and General Plan also allow senior housing, congregate care facilities, and affordable housing in some nonresidential zoning districts. Senior housing is also permitted in the CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-81 Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Community Commercial (CC), Service Commercial (SC), Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT), and Professional Office (PO) zoning districts. Congregate care facilities are allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial, Highway/Tourist Commercial, Service Commercial, and Professional Office zoning districts. Residential, multiple -family housing shall be allowed in the PO zone only if the affordable housing overlay (AHO) applies to the property and the proposed development complies with all requirements of Chapter 17.21. Affordable housing and affordable senior housing projects are entitled to receive various incentives, provided the project meets the requirements of Section 65915 of the California Government Code. Affordable housing projects are entitled to receive qualifying density incentives through Section 17.10.020(M)(3)(a) of the Temecula Municipal Code and may also receive qualifying concessions through Section 17.10.020(M)(3)(b) of the Temecula Municipal Code. The types of concessions that may be offered for specific housing projects are discussed in detail in the Density Bonus and Incentive Law section of this Housing Element. Specific Plans A specific plan is a comprehensive planning document that guides the development of a defined geographic area in a mix of uses including residential, commercial, industrial, schools, and parks and open space. Specific plans typically include more detailed information than the General Plan about land use, traffic circulation, affordable housing programs, resource management strategies, development standards, and a comprehensive infrastructure plan. Specific plans are also used as a means of achieving superior design by providing flexibility in development standards beyond those contained in the Zoning Ordinance. the City Council has adopted more than a dozen specific plans. Each one contains detailed regulations, conditions, programs, and design criteria unique to a defined geographic area within Temecula and is intended to implement the General Plan. The adopted specific plans are consistent with the General Plan. Future specific plans, specific plan amendments, and development projects must be consistent with policies contained in the General Plan, including the General Plan Land Use and Community Design Elements. The following discussion summarizes three specific plans that will accommodate a significant portion of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) through the planning period. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBR-82 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Old Town Specific Plan The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted in 1994 and subsequently comprehensively amended in 2010 to plan comprehensively for the revitalization of Old Town Temecula. The intent of the Old Town Specific Plan is to create a dynamic, walkable and pedestrian friendly mixed -use core in Old Town that consistent of attractive, high quality development, respectful of its existing historic buildings, while maintaining a unified design theme and unique architectural character. The Old Town Specific Plan is a form -based code and does not include minimum or maximum development standards. Although the Old Town Specific Plan allows for mixed -use development in horizontal and vertical formats, projects are allowed to be 100% residential. As included in the Regulating Plan for the Specific Plan, the Downtown Core area is expected to see development at densities between 40-70 du/ac, the Residential/Limited Mixed Use area is expected to see densities of 20-70 du/ac, and the Neighborhood Residential area is expected to see densities between 20-35 du/ac. Residential development in the Old Town Specific Plan area can occur at densities of at least 30 du/ac. During the past planning period, the City has seen significant development interest in the Old Town area. In particular, the Old Town area has been particularly attractive for affordable housing development, and the City recently approved two affordable housing projects in Old Town under the City's Affordable Housing Overlay, which applies to several properties within the Old Town Specific Plan. Harveston Specific Plan The Harveston Specific Plan is an approximately 550-acre planned community that was initially approved by the City of Temecula City Council in 2001. The Specific Plan was divided into 12 planning areas in an effort to create a distinct cluster of future uses/activities and to identify potential time frames for individual project development to occur in a timely manner within the overall Specific Plan concept. The Specific Plan proposed a maximum 1,921 dwelling units (1,621 single- family residences and 300 multi -family residences); a 110.4-acre service commercial area; a 17.3-acre lake/lake park facility; a 19.5-acre community park; a 13.9-acre arroyo park; a 2-acre paseo park; three mini parks totaling 1.5 acres; a 1.8-acre village green, trails, paseos, and bike lanes; a 12-acre elementary school on a 550-acre site; and 63.9 acres of major streets. The Specific Plan also allowed for an approximately 13-acre mixed -use district overlay intended to function as the Village Center. This area allowed up to 20,000 square feet of retail, restaurant and office uses; a daycare facility; a congregate care facility; a worship site; an approximately 15,000 square -foot private club house with fitness center; and residential, educational, recreation, and park uses. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-83 The Harveston Specific Plan area has been mostly developed. However, in 2020, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment to change the General Plan land use designation from Service Commercial to Specific Plan Implementation and add a residential overlay to approximately 87.54- acres of Planning Area 12, allowing for the future development of a maximum of 1,000 additional residential units. At this time, the unit mix of single-family residences and multi -family residences is unknown as there are no specific detailed project plans or proposed project designs. For the purposes of this analysis, the residential overlay assumes 1,000 small lot detached single family homes that would be developed, the majority of which would be market -rate. However, the 1,000 units allowed for under the Residential Overlay may be distributed over any of the Residential Overlay parcels so that the net density of one parcel could be significantly greater than another parcel. The expected density range for parcels in the Residential Overlay varies from 7-20 du/ac, but the Specific Plan expressly states that densities may exceed this range, with no maximum density identified, so long as the total number of units allowed under the Residential Overlay does not exceed 1,000 units. This area, which has been identified as a key location to accommodate a portion of the City's RHNA, includes the lot south of the Audi Temecula car dealership, and the lot east of the Mercedes Benz of Temecula, which are currently vacant. The remaining planning areas of the Harveston Specific Plan are developed with single family and multi- family residences; the Ysabel Barnett Elementary School; the ABC Child Care Village; the Harveston Lake and Harveston Lake Park; the Harveston Community Park; and open space areas. Implementation of the additional residential development would require the construction of public facilities and services to serve the future development of a maximum of 1,000 residential units. Services include: water, wastewater, storm drainage, electricity, natural gas, telecommunications, and solid waste disposal. The adequacy of these services were evaluated in the environmental document prepared to support the General Plan and Specific Plan Amendment and specific programs and improvements have been identified in order to support development of these new housing units. Altair Specific Plan The Altair Specific Plan applies to development of a 270-acre land parcel west of the Old Town planning area. Previously, the General Plan and Zoning Map had designated the majority of the project area as Specific Plan-8, Westside Specific Plan. However, this was a previously adopted document that never developed as a built project. CITY OF TEMECULA GLNERAL PLAN HBK-84 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT In 2017, the City Council approved Specific Plan-15, Altair, to reimagine the site and plan for a new vibrant development area just outside of Old Town Temecula. Altair is envisioned as the complementary residential component to the Old Town Specific Plan area of the City of Temecula. The two plan areas are integral to a successful urban mixed -use environment. Altair is located directly adjacent to Old Town Temecula and its added residential population base will support the commercial uses of Old Town. There are few housing opportunities in Old Town currently, limiting the clientelle of Old Town's shops and restaurants to visitors who arrive primarily by car. Old Town businesses are therefore very dependent on tourism, which can fluctuate dramatically. The downtown area must also satisfy the intense parking demand of all of those visitors. Altair will provide up to 1,750 new homes for a range of household sizes, income and demographics. The homes of Altair will be a pedestrian -oriented community within walking or cycling distance of Old Town. The dense design will attract residents looking for an urban lifestyle, a demographic that tends to patronize the type of restaurants and shops already in Old Town. These residents will broaden and stabilize the consumer base for Old Town businesses. Altair also provides public amenities close to Old Town. A central park, plazas, play field and an elementary school are proposed. A new Western Bypass links Temecula Parkway with Rancho California Road, an important public benefit to alleviate traffic congestion in Old Town. Altair's attractive trails, vistas and parks will add to and diversify the tourism market of the vicinity. The Altair project area is comprised of two portions: the majority 215 acres (which will be developed) and a non-contiguous 55-acre site to the south that is designated for a use benefitting the public, predominantly through conservation. The site slopes dramatically, offering striking views from vantage points on the site as well as providing a visual backdrop to Old Town. A substantial portion of the site will be added to the wildlife corridor established under the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and will, therefore, be maintained in a natural state. The Altair Specific Plan lays out a vision to provide a range of housing types at different densities and intensities. In particular, the Specific Plan identifies the following allowable building types, at densities and intensities allowing for at least 30 du/ac: • Detached housing • Multiplex • Rowhouses • Live/Work CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-85 • Micro Units • Multifamily Walk-up • Multifamily Podium The Altair Specific Plan does not set minimum or maximum density requirements. The Specific Plan identifies a range of appropriate densities for residential development by sub -planning area, which anticipates development to occur at densities ranging from 4 du/ac (in very limited areas adjacent to natural open space) to 33 du/ac (closer to Old Town). The density ranges identified for each sub -planning area may be increased by the transfer of unused development intensity from one village to another administratively, so long as the total number of dwelling units in the Altair Specific Plan is not exceeded. This approach allows for significant flexibility to respond to market trends and demands, accommodate affordable housing, provide a variety of housing types, and create connections to Old Town Temecula. Additionally, the City has seen significant development interest in building affordable housing in the Old Town area, and anticipating development of additional affordable housing in the Altair community reflects the City's vision to accommodate more affordable development near Old Town and adjacent to goods and services in a walkable, mixed -use environment. Uptown Specific Plan The Uptown Specific Plan, adopted in 2014, is intended to bring new life to the Jefferson Avenue corridor by encouraging residential, commercial and retail uses, and reducing development obstacles, such as environmental review, parking, and permit processing. The Uptown Specific Plan is a form based code, expecting residential densities of at least 30 du/ac. The recommended minimum density for all zoning districts within the Uptown Specific Plan area is 25 du/ac, and building heights range from 4- to 8-stories, for areas designated for residential development (as included in Appendix A). The Uptown Specific Plan does not include a maximum density or intensity for new development. The City has seen significant development interest in the Uptown Specific Plan area, with a special focus on affordable housing. These projects are attracted to the form based environment in Uptown and find that the proximity to goods and services coupled with the flexible development plan allow for more affordable housing options to be developed in Temecula. As the City continues to promote Uptown as a desirable location for new affordable residential development, the City expects to continue to see development at densities of at least 30 du/ac (or higher), and finds that Uptown is a logical location to accommodate a portion of the City's lower income RHNA. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-86 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT 3. Provisions for a Variety of Housing Housing element law specifies that jurisdictions must identify adequate sites to be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards to encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multi -family rental housing, agricultural employee housing, manufactured homes, senior and affordable housing, congregate care facilities, emergency shelters, transitional housing, supportive housing, efficiency unit housing, second dwelling units, and housing for persons with disabilities. Table H-50 summarizes Temecula's permitted residential housing by zoning district and the following paragraphs describe the City's provision for these types of housing. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-87 Table 50: Permitted Housing By Zoning District ZONE HOUSING TYPE HR RR VL L-1 L-2 LM M CC HT NC SC PO PDO SP H HR-SM' Single-family detached P P P P P P P C C C C C — P Duplex (two-family dwellings) — — — _2 _2 _2 P P — See Refer to Single-family attached (greater _ _ P p Table H- individual P — than two units) 28B specific plans. Multiple -family — — — — — — P C - - - - P — Manufactured homes P P P P P P P P P Mobile home park — — C3 C C C C C — Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or P P P P P P P P P dependent or neglected children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally Refer to disordered, disabled, or C C C C C C P See individual P C dependent or neglected children Table H- specific (seven to twelve) 28B plans. Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six P P P P P P P P P or fewer) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility C C C3 C C C P P C (seven or more) Residential care facilities for the P P P P P P P P P P P P P P elderly (six or fewer) Residential care facilities for the C C C C C C P P P P P P P C elderly (seven or more) See Refer to Residential care facilities (six or P P P P P P P - Table H individual P P fewer) specific plans. Residential care facilities (seven C C C C C C C _ _ P C or more) V Congregate care residential P P P - - P facilities for the elderly' l I l O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L P L A N H-88 ZONE HOUSING TYPE HR RR VL L-1 L-2 LM M CC HT NC SC PO PDO SP H HR-SM' Boarding, rooming and lodging _ _ C C — facilities Accessory dwelling units P P P P P P P See Refer to P P Table H- individual Guest house P P P P P P P� 28B specific P° P plans. Family day care homes —small P P P P P P P - P P Family day care homes —large' P P P P P P P - - P P Day care centers C C C C C C C - C C Bed and breakfast C C C C C C C C C establishments6 Refer to Emergency shelters C C C3 C C C P - Table eH- individual P C Transitional housing C C C3 C C C P - - 28B specific plans. P C Supportive housing C C C3 C C C P - P C Efficiency Unit housing - - - - P - P Source: City of Temecula 2021. Notes: General Note - A Conditional Use Permit for new construction requires Director's Review and Hearing which includes consideration at a noticed public hearing, for matters that are considered to have special significance or impact, the Director of Planning may refer such items to the Planning Commission for consideration. Conditional Use Permits without Development Plans are approvable by the Director of Planning. Conditional Use Permits with Development Plans are approvable by hearing body required for the Development Plan. Major Modifications of projects requiring Development Plans which were approved by the Planning Commission or City Council shall be considered by the original approval body. Increases in building square footage that result in a building larger than 10,000 square feet shall be considered by the Planning Commission. 1. Development within the HR-SM zoning district is subject to Section 17.06.080, Hillside development standards. 2. A duplex or two-family dwelling may be permitted on corner lots with a Planned Development Overlay pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.22 of this title. 3. These uses are not permitted within the Nicolas Valley rural preservation area, as identified in Figure LU-5 of the land use element of the general plan. 4. Subject to the supplemental development standards contained in Chapter 17.10 of this title. 5. Reserved 6. Allowed only with a single-family residence. 7. Subject to the provisions of Section 17.06.050(I). 9; CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-89 Table 51: Permitted Housing By Zoning District ZONE PDO-1 PDO-2 PDO-7 Area PDO-7 Area PDO-7 HOUSING TYPE 1A, 1B 2 Area 3 Single-family detached P' P P P Duplex (two-family dwellings) P' P Single-family attached (greater than two units) P P Multiple -family P P Manufactured homes P Mobile home park Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or P dependent or neglected children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, disabled, or P dependent or neglected children (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility P (six or fewer) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility P (seven or more) Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P C C Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or p C C more) Residential care facilities (six or fewer) P Residential care facilities (seven or more) P Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly P Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities � C - - - Accessory dwelling unit Guest house P2 Family day care homes —small P Family day care homes —large' P - - Day care centers _ C - - - Bed and breakfast establishments - - - - Emergency shelters k P - - - Transitional housing P - - - Supportive Housing - - - - Efficiency Unit Housing - - - - SOURCE: City of Temecula 2021. Notes: 1. Detached residential or zero lot -line units, duplexes and two-family dwellings are permitted only with the approval of the Planning Commission. 2. Allowed onlv with a sinale-familv residence. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-90 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Permanent and Seasonal Housing for Agricultural Employees: Agriculture is a predominant industry in Riverside County, but there is very little farmland that is considered prime, unique, or of local importance within the City limits (General Plan, Figure OS-3). While there are no agricultural operations in the City of Temecula, nearby wineries represent an employee base for agricultural workers. Agricultural workers face various housing issues due to their typically lower incomes and the seasonal nature of their work. However, since there is an insignificant amount of existing agricultural land, the City does not provide agricultural employee housing and does not anticipate a need for permanent and seasonal agricultural employee housing. Other opportunities for agricultural worker housing are discussed earlier in this Housing Element. Additionally, Program 16 is proposed to address compliance with the Employee Housing Act which includes employee housing requirements for agricultural employees. Factory -Built Housing/Modular and Mobile Homes: Temecula allows for the provision of manufactured housing in all of its residential zoning districts, but requires a permanent foundation. Mobile home parks are allowed with a conditional use permit in all of the residential zoning districts, except Hillside Residential (HR) and Rural Residential (RR), where they are not permitted. Manufactured housing must be certified according to the National Mobile Home Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 and must conform to all other development and use requirements applicable to the primary units in the zoning district. The units must stand on a permanent foundation, and the materials used for the siding must be approved by the Planning Director. Additionally, the City recognizes the potential for additional affordable factory -built housing as second dwelling units. Senior Housing/Affordable Housing: There are a total of 17 affordable housing developments throughout the City of Temecula. Affordable housing is permitted in High, Medium, and Low Density Residential zoning districts and in the City's Affordable Housing Overlay areas. In addition to development on vacant land within the permitted zones and overlay areas, the City recognizes the potential for additional affordable housing in future mixed -use areas and Specific Plan areas, including Old Town, Harveston and Altair. Affordable housing can also be achieved in the form of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The Municipal Code allows for ADUs in all residential and mixed -use zoning districts where single-family residences are permitted, in accordance with State law. For additional information on affordable housing within the City, please reference the Housing Element sections on housing stock and housing resources. Senior and affordable housing are permitted by -right in the High, Medium, and Low Medium Density Residential zoning districts, with approval of a development plan. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-91 Senior housing is also allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial, Service Commercial, Highway/Tourist Commercial, and Professional Office zoning districts. Senior housing constructed in the Neighborhood Commercial zone will be developed to be consistent with the development and performance standards allowed in the Medium Density Residential zoning district. For the Community Commercial, Service Commercial, Highway/Tourist Commercial, and Professional Office zoning districts, senior housing will be developed consistent with the development and performance standards allowed for the High Density Residential zoning district. Affordable Housing Affordable housing is permitted by -right where the parcel is identified with the Affordable Housing Overlay. There are various types of income levels when defining affordable housing: Moderate -Income Household. Persons or families whose income does not exceed 120% of area median income (AMI), adjusted annually for family size. Low -Income Household. • Persons or families whose income does not exceed 80% of AMI, adjusted annually for family size. Very Low -Income Household. • Persons or families whose income does not exceed 50% of AMI, adjusted annually for family size. Extremely Low -Income Household.- Persons or families whose income does not exceed 30% of AMI, adjusted annually for family size. Affordable Housing Project Incentives Currently, there are two basic sources of law governing affordable housing project incentives within the City: (1) density bonus law; and (2) Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.21, which defines the City's Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District. in► Density Bonus and Incentive Law The state density bonus statutes require the City to grant a density bonus and incentives or concessions to a developer who agrees to construct or donate land for affordable housing. Density bonuses are allowed as per regulations in Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.06.050. Table 52 below lists the thresholds in which the State decides if a project can be deemed all or partly affordable housing. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-92 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 52: Housing Qualifying for Density Bonus Type of Qualifying Housing Required Percentage of Unit Lower Income 10% of proposed units Very Low Income 5% of proposed units Senior Citizen Housing Development Any senior housing development Moderate -Income Condominium or Planned 10% of proposed units Development Once the Project has been deemed a partly or fully affordable housing project, the applicant maybe allowed to develop additional density. The City must calculate the extra density to which an applicant is entitled. The density bonus law not only uses a base percentage of the project (listed below), but a sliding scale allows for greater density bonuses when an applicant includes more than the minimum qualifying percentage of affordable units. To qualify for a density bonus through donation of land, the applicant must propose a tentative tract map, parcel map, or other residential development project. The donor of land meeting the specified criteria is entitled to a base 15% density bonus, with a sliding scale increase of 1% and an additional increase of 1% for each unit in the total number of affordable units entitled on the donated land in excess of the 10% qualifying percentage. Listed below are the base and sliding scale bonuses (see Table 53).] Table 53: Density Bonuses Allowed Type of Qualifying Base Density Bonus Sliding Scale Density Bonus Housing Lower Income 20% increase in the 1.5% increase in density bonus for each 1% number of units, increase in lower -income affordable units to a unless a lesser maximum density bonus of 35% of proposed units \ percentage is requested by the applicant Very Low Income 20% increase in the 2.5% increase in density bonus for each 1% number of units, increase in very low-income affordable units up to unless a lesser a maximum density bonus of 35% of proposed percentage is units requested by the applicant Senior Citizen 20% increase in the No sliding scale increase Housing number of units, Development unless a lesser percentage is requested by the applicant Moderate -Income 5% increase in the 1 % increase in density bonus for each 1 % increase Condominium or number of units, in moderate income affordable units up to a Planned unless a lesser maximum density bonus of 35% of proposed units. Development percentage is requested by the applicant CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-93 Percentage Of Affordable Units 10% Lower Income or 5% Very Low Income 1 or 10% Moderate Income (condo/planned development) 20% Lower Income or 10% Very Low Income 2 or 20% Moderate Income (condo/planned development) 30% Lower Income or 15% Very Low Income 3 or 30% Moderate Income (condo/planned development) Number of Incentives or Concessions In addition to the density bonuses described above, the applicant may request specific incentives or concessions. Provided that the agency cannot make findings sufficient to deny requested incentives or concessions, as provided by Government Code Section 65915(d), incentives or concessions must be granted if requested by the applicant. The potential concessions include: • An increase in the amount of required lot coverage; • A modification to the setback or required yard provisions; • An increase in the maximum allowable building height; • A reduction in the amount of required on -site parking; • A reduction in the amount of on -site landscaping, except that no reduction in on -site recreational amenities may be approved unless the affordable housing is in close proximity with easy access to a public park with recreational amenities; or • A reduction in the minimum lot area. An applicant who receives a density bonus and/or other concessions or incentives must agree to ensure the continued affordability of all low- and very low-income density bonus units for at least 30 years, unless a longer period of time is required. The minimum length of the affordability covenant will depend upon whether the City grants any additional concessions or incentives on top of the density bonus as well as whether any City Housing Fund moneys were also used for the project. Efficiency Unit Housing: Efficiency unit housing offers one opportunity for low-cost housing that is specifically designed to meet some of the varying needs of several special needs groups. Efficiency unit housing provides viable housing alternatives for individuals in these special needs groups. The Temecula Municipal CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-94 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Code allows efficiency unit housing in the Medium (M) and High (H) density residential zoning districts and conditionally permits them in the Community Commercial and Professional Office zones. Congregate Care: Congregate care facilities are not limited specifically to density requirements as long as all of the development standards for the zoning district are met. Congregate care facilities are allowed in the Low -Density Residential, Low Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial, Highway/ Tourist Commercial, Service Commercial, and Professional Office zoning districts. In Temecula, congregate care facilities include facilities for seniors and the disabled in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 50062.5, which requires facilities that are "planned, designed, and managed to include facilities and common space that allow for direct services and support services that maximize the residents' potential for independent living and which is occupied by elderly or handicapped persons or households, as defined in Sections 50067 and 50072. Direct services and support services which are provided or made available shall relate to the nutritional, social, recreational, housekeeping, and personal needs of the residents and shall be provided or made available at a level necessary to assist the residents to function independently." Accessory Dwelling Units: The City of Temecula allows accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in all residential and mixed -use districts where a detached single-family unit is permitted. In 2020, the City updated its Zoning Code to implement the requirements of Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 to allow accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units in a manner that encourages their development but simultaneously minimizes impacts on traffic, parking, density, and other areas where the city is still permitted to exercise local control. ADUs cannot be sold but may be rented for a period of at least 31 days. See the Housing Element section on housing resources for additional information on second dwelling units. As specified in Program 16, the City will amend its Zoning Code as it relates to Planned Development Overlays 2 and 7 to allow for accessory dwelling units in accordance with State law. Transitional and Supportive Housing: Transitional and supportive housing is provided to socially support individuals and provide basic life skills and is coupled with social services such as job training, alcohol and drug abuse programs, and case management. The Temecula Municipal Code allows transitional and supportive housing in all residential areas within the City. Transitional and supportive housing are permitted by right in Medium and High Density CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-95 Residential and require a conditional use permit in all other residential zones. Transitional and supportive housing are also allowed in the Community Commercial and Professional Office zoning districts with a conditional use permit. Emergency Shelters/Homeless Housing: The City facilitates the development of emergency shelters by permitting the development of such facilities in the Medium and High Density Residential districts by right without a conditional use permit or other discretionary action. These uses are also permitted in other residential districts with a conditional use permit. Emergency shelters are also permitted with a conditional use permit in the Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial, Highway/Tourist Commercial, Service Commercial, Professional office, Business Park, and Light Industrial zoning districts. Housing for Persons with Disabilities: The City provides housing opportunities for disabled persons through the provision of affordable, barrier -free housing. The requirements for accessibility in the California Building Code and the Temecula Municipal Code ensure reasonable accommodation and compliance with accessibility requirements and are provided in all projects within Temecula. Residential care facilities (group homes) for six or fewer residents are permitted in all residential zoning districts. The development of residential care facilities for seven or more residents is permitted in the High Density Residential zoning district by right, without a conditional permit, or other discretionary action. Facilities for seven or more residents are also permitted in all other residential zoning districts with a conditional use permit The maximum densities for residential care facilities are not limited specifically to density requirements so long as the project complies with all development standards of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. The City does not restrict occupancy of unrelated individuals in group homes, and Section 17.34.010 of the Zoning Code defines "family" as one or more persons living together as a single housekeeping unit in a single dwelling unit. Family also means the persons living together in a licensed residential facility, as that term is defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 1502(a)(1) serving six or fewer persons, excluding the licensee, the members of the licensee's family, and persons employed as facility staff who reside at the facility. The City permits housing for special needs groups, including for individuals with disabilities, without regard to distances between such uses or the number of uses in any part of the City. The City allows some variation from the application of its parking standards. Section 17.24.040 of the Zoning Ordinance would allow, for example, the CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-96 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT reduction of parking spaces for a unique use such as a senior housing project or other special needs. Currently, Temecula has two group homes for teenagers with a total capacity of 18 persons. In addition, two residential facilities in the City offer housing for up to approximately 14 developmentally disabled persons. Although, cities retain land use jurisdiction regarding these homes, the State Fire Marshal ensures the safety of group homes with seven or more residents. The City of Temecula contracts with the State Fire Marshal through the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) in conjunction with the Riverside County Fire Department. The Building and Safety Division has developed a positive working relationship with the County Fire Department that ensures that any improvements and/or maintenance for group homes are handled through the City's normal concurrent review process. It has been a departmental philosophy to provide complete direction for applicants, as well as looking for solutions when problems or barriers present themselves on a project. Because of this, in the past the City has had success finding reasonable solutions to noncompliant code issues with successful end results. The City's site planning requirements and assistance programs reduce housing constraints for persons with disabilities by providing necessary regulations for a variety of disabilities and housing conditions. The City does not impose special permit procedures or requirements that could impede the retrofitting of homes for accessibility. Compliance with these development standards ensures reasonable accommodation is provided for all new projects. The City will continue to implement the existing requirements as well as continue to implement its formalized reasonable accommodation processes for individual homeowners requesting exceptions to development standards to accommodate a specific disability. In addition, retrofit assistance for persons with disabilities may be available through a future Residential Rehabilitation Program for lower income families as listed in the City's Five -Year Consolidated Plan. 4. Development and Planning Fees The cost of development is a constraint to the implementation of affordable housing projects. Typically, the cost of developing raw land is significantly increased by the various regulations and fees local governments impose on developers. The City of Temecula charges various fees and assessments to cover the cost of processing permits and providing certain services and utilities. Table 54 summarizes that City's planning fee requirements for residential development, while Table 55 depicts the City's CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-97 development impact fees for residential development. The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) mitigation fee was established in order to implement the goals and objectives of the MSHCP and to mitigate the impacts caused by new developments in western Riverside County. The fee is part of the mitigation fees for species protection required under the MSHCP. The collection of the fees supplements the financing for the acquisition of lands supporting species covered by the MSHCP and to cover new development's share of this cost. Developments where the MSHCP fee applies have the same fee structure throughout the MSHCP plan area. Nearly all of the vacant developable parcels located west of I-15 in western Temecula are within the MSHCP criteria cell and core linkage areas, as are all parcels located in the southwestern corner of the City. Additional vacant developable parcels in the northeast corner of the City are also located in the MSHCP criteria cell and core linkage areas. Few underutilized residential properties are located in the MSHCP criteria cell and core linkage areas. If a site is located in a criteria cell, a HANS application must be completed and submitted to the City along with a $1,500 check made payable to Western Riverside Conservation Authority (RCA). The check and one copy of the application are mailed to the County for review and determination of any site inclusion for the MSHCP conservation area. It is estimated that the total development fees are $13,375 for a single- family unit and $10,920 for a multi -family unit. These fees are similar to other fees in the region. Comparing the cost of one jurisdiction's development and planning fees to another is difficult since each jurisdiction calculates and applies its fee schedule in its own unique way. While no recent studies available to the general public have been completed in Riverside County to compare the fees charged by various jurisdictions, a recent trend used by other jurisdictions is to assess a deposit that varies per application type, and then charge an hourly "fully burdened" rate to recover costs. The City of Temecula assesses a fixed rate for each application type, based on the average hours of staff time required to process each application. This fee schedule is adjusted annually based on the consumer price index for the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area. Table H-31 reflects the fee schedule for the 2012-2013 fiscal year. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-98 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 54: Planning Fee Schedule* Project Type City of Department of Temecula Fee Environmental Health Fee Planning and Zoning Conditional Use Permit - No Site Changes'.2,3,4 $4.089 $234 Conditional Use Permit - with a Development Plan' 2,3.4 $1,303 N/A Development Agreement $65,820 N/A Development Agreement - Major Modification' 2,3.4 $15,078 N/A Development Agreement - Minor Modification' 2,3,4 $4,309 N/A DIF Credit or Reduction $1,100 N/A Development Plan -Less than 10,000 sf' 2,3,4 $9,839 $136 Development Plan - 10,000 sf to 100,000 sf' 2'3,4 $13,366 $136 Development Plan - Over 100,000 sf' 2'3,4 $16,078 $136 General Plan Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment - Text or Exhibit 1,2,3,4 $9,287 $59 General Plan Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment - Official Zoning Map $7,278 $59 and Land Map' 2,3,4 General Plan Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment - Official Zoning Map $5,009 $59 or Land Map'•2,3.4 Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit $934 N/A Variance' 43,4 $4,721 $120 Minor Exception' 2,3,4 $634 N/A Minor Exception (individual homeowner) $158 N/A Municipal Code Amendment' $7,279 Specific Plan - New',2,3,4 $104,279 $197 Specific Plan Amendment - Major $41,388 $61 Specific Plan Amendment - Minor ' $14.441 $61 Planned Development Overlay' 2,3,4 $38,367 N/A Subdivisions Certificate of Land Division Compliance (fee per parcel)''2'3'4 $1,594 $138 Common Interest Development Conversion',2,3p $5,524 N/A Lot Line Adjustment $1,612 N/A Merger of Contiguous Parcels $2,419 N/A Minor Change (to approved Tentative Map) $2,442 N/A Parcel Map - Tentative (Residential) w/Waiver of Final Map' 2,3 $3,927 $389 Parcel Map - Tentative (Residential) Standard',2'3 $4,904 $675 Parcel Map -Tentative (Vesting)' 2,3 $4,298 $424 Parcel Map - Tentative (Revised)' z3 $4,273 $203 Condominium Mapl,2,3 $14,326 $538 Tract Map - Standard 5-34 lots/units' 2,3 $12,874 $203 Tract Map - Standard 35-75 lots/units''2,3 $14,563 $203 Tract Map - Standard 76-165 lots/units' 2,3 $16,688 $203 Tract Map - Standard 166+ lots/units' 2'3 $18,661 $203 Tract Map - Standard - Revised Map',z3 $7,292 $203 Tract Map - Vesting 5-34 lots/units''2,3 $16,520 $424 Tract Map - Vesting 35-75 lots/units' 2,3 $18,347 $424 Tract Map - Vesting 76-165 lots/units' 2,3 $20,570 $424 Tract Map - Vesting 166 lots/units''2,3 $22,319 $424 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-99 Project Type City of Temecula Fee Department of Environmental Health Fee Tract Map — Vesting — Revised Map' 2,3 $10,262 $424 Phasing Plan for Tentative Map — Sewered $4,366 $57 Phasing Plan for Tentative Map — Subsurface Disposal $4,366 $138 Residential Tract Product Review' 4 $12,631 N/A Reversion to Acreage $930 $72 Miscellaneous Charges Certificate of Historic Appropriateness' 2,3,4 $562 N/A Substantial Conformance $7,706 $61 Extension of Time with Public Hearing' 2,3,4 $3,429 $63 Extension of Time without Public Hearing',2,3,4 $1,739 $63 Extension of Time — Subdivision Ordinance' 2,3,4 $4,301 $63 'SOURCE: Temecula User Fee Schedule (2021-2022); updated annually each July 1. 1. Add CEQA Fee of $325 for environmental determination. If environmental determination is not exempt from CEQA, add $5,552 for Negative Declaration without Mitigation, or $7,590 for Negative Declaration with Mitigation. If EIR is required, add $59,811 for City -managed EIR or $88,192 for applicant -managed EIR. 2. Add UC Regents Fee of $60 (if required) — not applicable to duplicate applications 3. Add Traffic Study Fee (if required) of $3,008 (major) or $752 (minor) 4. Add DRC Landscape Fee of $250 (if new/modified landscaping is proposed) and DRC Architectural Review Fee of $.05 per building square foot (if new/modified architecture is proposed) 5. $528 to Environmental Health if Sewered; $424 to Environmental Health if Subsurface Disposal R 11 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-100 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 55: Development Impact Fees For The City of Temecula Development Fee Street System Improvements Traffic Signals and Traffic Control Systems Corporate Facilities Police Facilities Fire Protection Facilities Parks and Recreational Improvements Open Space & Trails Development Libraries Total Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Single Family Multi -Family Stephen' Kangaroo Rat Plan Fee (K-RAT) Lot greater than % gross acre — per dwelling unit All other Residential — per gross acre Multispecies Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Residential Less than 8.0 DU Residential Between 8.1 and 14.0 DU Residential Greater than 14.1 DU Art in Public Places Residential — Single/Multi — Family Quimby — In -Lieu Fee $310,000 per acre Single Family residential (Detached Garage) Single family Attached (Attached Garage) Multi -Family Attached (2-4 Units) Multi -Family Attached (5 or More Units) Mobile Homes School Developer Fees Single Family and Multifamily Residential Restricted Senior Communities SOURCE: City of Temecula 2021. Land Use (Fee/Unit) Residential Attached Residential Detached $1,717.58 $243.11 $356.92 $627.33 $390.77 $2,901.20 $845.65 $772.74 $7,866.30 $9, 810 $6,389 $250-$500 IN3 $2,935 $1,473 $670 1/10 of 1 % of project cost in excess of $100,000 3.12 Avg. Density/DU 2.85 Avg. Density/DU 2.48 Avg. Density/DU 2.43 Avg. Density/DU 2.00 Avg. Density/DU $3.20/Sq. Ft $0.66/Sq. Ft. $2,453.64 $347.33 $665.69 $354.58 $842.15 $4,049.59 $1,180.35 $1,078.60 $10,971.93 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-101 Table 56 provides the ratio of typical development cost to fees per unit for single and multi -family developments in Temecula that do not require preparation of a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report. The exact fees associated with an individual project will vary greatly based on the exact project parameters. However, the City reviews its fees annually to confirm that its fees are in line with those charged by other agencies in the region and that they do not present a constraint to development. Table 56: Total Processing and Fees for Typical Single- and Multi -Family Units Housing Type Total Fees Estimated Development Estimated Proportion of Fees to Cost per Unit Development Costs per Unit Single Family Unit $13,375 $350,000 3.8 % Multi -Family Unit $10,920 $200,000 5.5 % SOURCE: City of Temecula, 2021. 5. Building Codes and Enforcement Staffing and Process As Building and Safety and Code Enforcement are under the same department supervision, the exchange of information between Building and Code Enforcement staff members is excellent. Enforcement items are a regularly occurring weekly meeting topic during Building and Safety weekly staff meetings. The Code Enforcement Division consists of three permanent officers. Each officer has an assigned geographic area of the City and is very familiar with problematic properties. Each officer regularly patrols their area to ensure that any prior complaints have been resolved and that they have responded to any new complaints. The department is complaint -driven, which means that officers respond to complaints as they come in to the City. In addition, the officers make every effort to be proactive in their assigned geographic areas. Several of the code enforcement officers have received training in dealing with housing issues and are able to respond with building inspectors to calls on substandard housing. Building Codes The City of Temecula has adopted the California Building Code, 2019 Edition, Volumes 1 and 2 (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including Appendix C-Agricultural Buildings, and Appendix F—Rodent Proofing. This includes the Historical Building Code, Existing Building code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, Administrative Code, Energy Code, Green Building CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-102 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Standards Code, Reference Standards Code, and Residential Code. A copy of each code is maintained in the office of the City Clerk and is made available for public inspection. This collection of codes is considered to be the minimum necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. The City is responsible for enforcement of all the model codes. Further, the requirements for accessibility in the California Building Code will ensure that reasonable accommodation and compliance with accessibility requirements are provided in all projects within Temecula. Overall, the housing stock is in excellent condition. The City's Code Enforcement program is complaint -based and will not constrain the development or preservation of housing. When housing code violations are cited for units occupied by low- and moderate -income households, the Code Enforcement staff may offer information regarding rehabilitation programs. Reasonable Accommodations The City's process for providing reasonable accommodations allows individuals, or their representatives, to make requests for reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities as part of the permit process. No additional permits are required or additional fees charged by the City. Requests for reasonable accommodations to meet the needs of persons with disabilities are generally approved administratively, and a use permit is not required. An exception would be a use (in contrast to an accessory structure or appurtenance) that requires a discretionary (use) permit, such as a residential care facility of seven or more persons. City staff is available to provide assistance regarding the processing of requests for the construction of accessory structures. Information regarding the approval of these structures is included within all public notices and agendas, as applicable. 6. Local Processing and Permit Procedures ^ The time and cost of permit processing and review can be a constraint to housing development if significant development review is required. Project review and permit processing are necessary steps to ensure that residential construction proceeds in an orderly manner. The time required for project approval is often not so much a factor of the approval body (Director versus Planning Commission), but the complexity of the project and associated environmental issues. However, small infill projects that can be approved administratively are generally less complex and take a shorter time to obtain appropriate approvals. Large, residential subdivision maps, subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA compliance) require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-103 The evaluation and review process required by City procedures contributes to the cost of housing in that the holding costs incurred by developers during the review period are ultimately manifested in the unit's selling price. All discretionary development projects that involve new construction but are less than 10,000 square feet are subject to a Planning Director's hearing. The hearing is a publicly noticed hearing that permits the Planning Director to be the decision -maker on relatively minor applications. The Temecula Municipal Code contains findings that must be made for project approval. If the project meets the required findings, the project cannot be denied by the Planning Director. Development applications for projects greater than 10,000 square feet are subject to a Planning Commission hearing. The Planning Commission hearing is a publicly noticed hearing and the Commission may be the decision -maker for such applications provided there is no legislative action associated with the development application, such as a zone change or a General Plan amendment. The Planning Commission may also serve as an appeal board for the Director's hearing decisions. The Temecula Municipal Code contains findings that must be made for project approval. If the project meets the required findings, the project cannot be denied by the Planning Commission. Required findings for approval of a conditional use permit are as follows: 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the development code. 2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. 3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. 4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. 5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-104 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. Required findings for approval of a development plan are as follows: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The City Council hearing is a noticed public hearing for development applications that require a legislative action. The City Council may also serve as an appeal board for decisions made by the Planning Commission. The Temecula Municipal Code contains findings that must be made for project approval. If the project meets the required findings, the project cannot be denied. The City Council is the final decision -maker on all appeal actions. Mixed -use projects may be subject to any of the above types of public hearings, but are unlikely to be heard at the Planning Director's hearing because of the size of the project. The processing and permit procedures for mixed -use projects are no different than the processing of any other development application. The General Plan Land Use Element and Housing Element discuss concessions that can be made to accommodate the scale, density, or intensity of such projects. As a result, findings can be made to support consistency with the General Plan. Some minor development applications, such as a Minor Modification of an approved Development Plan, may be approved at the staff level. IN The average time for such administrative approvals is two to three weeks (see Table 57). The average time for projects to get to a Planning Director's hearing is eight to 14 weeks. Once approval is given, the A4%NL property owner must submit a grading plan to the Public Works Department and a building plan to the Building and Safety Department. Once approval is given, the property owner must submit the approved plans to the Community Development and Public Works departments to obtain the required permits. The average period for a project to get to the Planning Commission is four to six months. If the project needs to be heard by the City Council, the average time to get to this hearing is 12 to 18 months. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-105 Table 57: Typical Processing Times for Single- and Multi -Family Units Single Family Unit Multi -Family Unit Grading plan Development plan 6-9 months Building plans Submit for grading/ plan prior to PC approval Typical Approval Building permit Requirements Receive approval 3-6 months Home Product Review Building plans review 4-6 weeks Development Plan Condo Map Est. Total Processing Time rMinisterial 4-6 weeks Building Permit 1 to 1.5 years* SOURCE: City of Temecula, 2013 *Please note: total processing time has increased from the previous planning period due to volume of development. The City has not adopted any special design or environmental review processes that would add additional time to the processing period. However, the City must comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Riverside County regulations. In 2009, the City produced an environmental review procedures handbook for private development projects. The goal of this handbook is to help guide developers, City staff, and consultants through the environmental and City review process. This handbook is publicly available on the City's website. CEQA applies to all projects that require discretionary approval unless the project is determined to be exempt. A discretionary project is one that requires the exercise of judgment or deliberation by a public agency in determining whether the project will be approved or if a permit will be issued. For example, if a property owner wants to construct a new building or subdivide a property, it would be considered a discretionary project because the City must review the proposal before issuing an approval or permit. CEQA also applies to decisions that could lead to indirect impacts, such as making changes to local codes, policies, and general and specific plans. Usually CEQA does not apply to projects that are only subject to ministerial approval. A ministerial project is one that requires a public official to determine only that the project conforms to applicable zoning and building code requirements and that applicable fees have been paid. Some examples of projects that are generally ministerial include sign permits, roof replacements, interior alterations to residences, and landscaping changes. In addition to the CEQA process, Riverside County has completed a comprehensive planning effort called the Riverside County Integrated CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-106 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Project (RCIP). RCIP integrates three regional planning efforts: the County General Plan, a Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process to determine present and future roadway infrastructure, and the MSHCP to conserve listed and sensitive species and their habitats. The final MSHCP was approved by the County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003, and went into effect in March 2004. The MSHCP is a comprehensive, multi -jurisdictional effort that includes the County and 16 cities. Rather than deal with endangered species on a one -by -one basis, this plan focuses on the conservation of 146 species. The MSHCP supports a reserve system of approximately 500,000 acres, of which approximately 347,000 acres are currently in public ownership and 153,000 acres are currently in private ownership. The approved MSHCP contributes to the economic viability of the region by providing landowners, developers, and those who build public infrastructure with more certainty, a streamlined regulatory process, and identified project mitigation. The MSHCP is administered by the Regional Conservation Authority which represents the County and 16 cities which are participants in the plan. 7. Streamlining Approvals Lower Income Sites Included in Previous Elements While the site plan review process is not considered a constraint to housing, Program 16 has been provided to comply with Government Code 65583.2. This program will provide for ministerial approval (e.g., Planning Division Director's approval of site plan review and entitlements other than a subdivision map) of housing projects with a minimum of 20 percent of units affordable to lower income households and will increase certainty for affordable and multifamily developers related to residential sites throughout the community, as identified in Appendix A. SB 35 SB 35 provides provisions for streamlining projects based on a jurisdiction's progress towards its RHNA and timely submittal of the Housing Element Annual Progress Report. When jurisdictions have insufficient progress toward their above moderate income RHNA and/or have not submitted the latest Housing Element Annual Progress Report, these jurisdictions are subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 (Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017) streamlining) for proposed developments with at least 10% affordability. HCD reviews the annual progress report deadlines and RHNA progress on an annual basis. Temecula is currently subject to SB 35 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-107 streamlining provisions when proposed developments include 50% affordability. Program 16 has been provided to incorporate the mandatory streamlining provisions into the City's Zoning Code. These streamlining provisions will reduce approval requirements for projects that include a minimum of 50 percent of units affordable to lower income households and that meet the criteria specified by State law. 8. On- and Off -Site Improvements The Circulation Element of the Temecula General Plan identifies eight different roadway classifications (Table C-2) and cross -sections (Figure C-1) that include minimum dimensions for right-of-way accounting for lane width, center median, bike lane and/or multipurpose trails, curb, gutter, landscaping, and sidewalks. Figure C-2 of the Circulation Element identifies the locations and alignments of each road in Temecula by classification. Applicants for new development applications should consult the Circulation Element to determine the roadway classification fronting the project site and to determine the type of improvements that may be required for the proposed project. The City makes available standard drawings for on- and off -site improvements that establish infrastructure or site requirements that support new residential development. Typical site improvements for high density development include half -width street improvements for all frontage streets, built to General Plan standards. A typical local street width is 60 feet with 40 feet of pavement (two lanes). In addition, the appropriate level of R-O-W landscaping, 6-inch curb and gutter, and sidewalk improvements (either curb or parkway adjacent) are required for property frontage. Water, sewer, and drainage facilities are traditionally not under the direct control of the City. The City of Temecula coordinates with several water and sewer districts IN that directly administer the construction of water and sewer improvements. These improvements, for a high density/affordable housing project, typically require both potable and reclaimed water A4%NL systems. With respect to flood control and drainage facilities, these on - site improvements are under the direct control of the Riverside County Flood Control. While these improvements are necessary to ensure that new housing meets the City's development goals, the cost of these requirements can represent a significant share of the cost of producing new housing. Site improvement costs include the cost of providing access to the site, clearing the site, and grading the pad area. In the case of a subdivision, such costs may also include major improvements such as building roads and installing sewer, water, and other utilities. As with land costs, several variables affect costs, including site topography and proximity to established roads, sewers, and water lines. Engineering and other technical assistance costs are usually included with site improvements as these services are required to ensure that CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-108 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT development is constructed according to established codes and standards. Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the Municipal Code outlines site improvement requirements (Chapter 16.30) for a variety of parcel map division and subdivision scenarios and includes specific requirements for streets, domestic water, fire protection, sewage disposal. These and other site improvement costs are typical of all cities in California and do not impose a significant constraint on the development of housing in Temecula. The City does not impose any unusual requirements as conditions of approval for new development. Ak The City of Temecula requires full -frontage improvements for all approved development projects. The City typically does not make exceptions for frontage improvements because of the need to make connections for existing bike lanes and trails, and to correctly align roadways to avoid bottlenecks at narrower sections. The City may permit the possibility of deferring some improvements on a project -by - project basis. The deferral of improvements may be permitted when the costs of the improvements greatly outweighs the contractor's ability to enter into a reimbursement agreement or when timing of the needed improvements is beyond the control of the applicant, such as improvements to be made by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The City of Temecula recognizes that such requirements can potentially be considered regulatory barriers to affordable housing if the jurisdiction -determined requirements are greater (and hence, more costly) than those necessary to achieve health and safety requirements in the community. However, the cost to design such improvements is dramatically decreased when utilizing the City's standard drawings. C. State Tax Policies and Regulations 1. Article 34 of the California Constitution Article 34 was enacted in 1950. It requires that low rent housing projects developed, constructed, or acquired in any manner by any state or public agency, including cities, receive voter approval through the referendum process. The residents of Temecula have not passed a referendum to allow the City to develop, construct, or acquire affordable housing. While California Health and Safety Code further clarifies the scope and applicability of Article 34 to exclude housing projects that have deed - restrictions on less than 49% of the units or rehabilitation/ reconstruction of housing projects that are currently deed -restricted or occupied by lower -income persons, Article 34 still constitutes an obstacle for local governments to be directly involved in the production of long-term affordable housing. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-109 2. Environmental Protection State regulations require environmental review of proposed discretionary projects (e.g., subdivision maps, use permits). Costs resulting from fees charged by local government and private consultants needed to complete the environmental analysis, and from delays caused by the mandated public review periods, are also added to the cost of housing and passed on to the consumer. However, the presence of these regulations helps preserve the environment and ensure environmental safety to Temecula's residents. In addition, much of the remaining vacant residential land is located within approved specific plan areas for which the required environmental review has already been completed. D. Infrastructure Constraints Another factor adding to the cost of new construction is the cost of providing adequate infrastructure (major and local streets; curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; water and sewer lines; and street lighting), which is required to be built or installed in new development. In most cases, these improvements are dedicated to the City, which is then responsible for their maintenance. The cost of these facilities is covered by developers and is added to the cost of new housing units, which is eventually passed on to the homebuyer or property owner. In addition, two areas of the City, which are designated for residential uses, are partially developed and do not have sewer service. Development of this land is limited to Very Low Density Residential uses. The majority of the remainder of future residential development within the City will occur in master planned communities or on sites adjacent to existing infrastructure. As a result, future residential development will not be constrained by the lack of sufficient infrastructure in the remainder of the City. The Rancho California Water District (RCWD) is the retail supplier of potable water to Temecula. According to the Growth Management/Public Facilities Element of the General Plan, the RCWD has adequate water supply to meet current demand and is investigating a number of sources to meet long-range demands. Upgrading existing wells, adding new wells, implementing a water recharge program, and increasing the use of reclaimed water are among the major strategies devised by the RCWD. Wastewater facilities in Temecula are provided by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), which has adequate capacity to meet current treatment demand. By closely working with the RCWD and the EMWD in developing supply options, conservation techniques, including the use of reclaimed water; and development CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-110 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT monitoring systems, the City can ensure that development does not outpace the long-term availability of water and the adequacy of wastewater treatment capacity. With the City of Temecula and its infrastructure providers coordinating planning and construction consistent with General Plan land use policy, future needs, including the 2021-2029 RHNA, can be met. To comply with Senate Bill 1087, upon adoption the City will immediately forward its adopted Housing Element to its water and wastewater providers so they can grant priority for service allocations to proposed developments that include units affordable to lower - income households. E. Environmental Constraints Temecula is impacted by various environmental hazards that include active fault traces, liquefaction and subsidence, steep slopes, and flooding. These natural hazards constrain residential development by threatening public safety and infrastructure. To protect the health, safety, and welfare of residents in Temecula, the City has adopted regulations that limit development within areas of high risk and/or require design standards that can withstand natural hazards. Other environmental constraints include infrastructure constraints. In preparing the City's inventory of vacant sites designated for residential development, the City considered the extent to which sites were constrained by hazards, and potential hazards are accounded for as part of the capacity study. Parties interested in obtaining more information for specific parcel listings in Appendix A may do so by contacting the City of Temecula Planning Department or by visiting the City's website at TemeculaCA.gov. The City's Information Systems department maintains an online GIS parcel search that can be used to identify any parcel within Temecula, including known environmental and other on - site constraints. Flood Plain (FP) Overlay District: The City has applied a Flood Plain Overlay District to portions of the City that are threatened by flooding hazards. The overlay district includes design requirements that must be met for new construction and substantial improvement of structures within the district. These design standards have been adopted to reduce the flood hazards threatening people and structures within the overlay district. Development on this property must comply with specific structural design standards that raise the cost of construction. However, this property represents only a fraction of the City's vacant land with Medium Density Residential zoning. The environmental constraints and the associated cost factor impacting this property will not compromise the City's ability to provide adequate CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-111 sites to accommodate its RHNA at all income levels for the duration of the planning period. Pursuant to the default density assigned to the City of Temecula through Section 65583.2, affordable housing is expected to be accommodated within areas where density is 30 units per acre by right or more through density bonus provisions. The City's Medium Density Residential zone allows a density of up to 12 units per acre by right and up to 18 units per acre with a density bonus. Medium Density Residential zoned property therefore is not considered suitable for affordable housing. Dam Inundation: Portions of Temecula face inundation if any of the three dams located in areas surrounding Temecula should fail. Lake Skinner Dam is an earthen dam at Skinner Reservoir (also known as Lake Skinner and located approximately 4.5 miles northeast of Temecula). Failure of the Lake Skinner Dam would result in flooding along Tucalota Creek and Benton Road, which is located near the south side of the reservoir, as well as flooding along parts of Santa Gertrudis Creek and Warm Springs Creek. Vail Lake is located over 6.0 miles southeast of Temecula; dam failure would inundate portions of the Pauba and Temecula valleys, including I-15 and an adjacent 3-mile area. Diamond Valley Lake is the largest reservoir in Southern California and is located north of Skinner Reservoir, nearly 6.0 miles northeast of Temecula. Its water is detained by two earthen dams. Failure of the western dam would result in flooding in the northern parts of the City. Several vacant developable parcels located near the western and southern perimeters of the City are at risk of inundation if dams north of the project site were breached. Far fewer vacant underutilized residential properties would be at risk of inundation. 100-Year and 500-Year Floodplains: A 100-year flood has an annual 1 % probability of occurring, and a 500-year flood has an annual 0.2% probability of occurring. The 100-year floodplain in the City of Temecula forms a "U" along the alignment of the northern, western (west of and adjacent to I-15), and southern perimeters of the City. The 500-year floodplain is noncontiguous and is generally located in the western and southern areas of the City, adjacent to 100-year floodplains. The 100-year floodplain includes several vacant developable parcels near the northern and western perimeters of the City, and the 500-year floodplain is generally outside of or adjacent to vacant developable parcels in the same area. In general, no underutilized residential parcels are located in the 100-year floodplain or the 500-year floodplain. Alquist-Priolo: Temecula is located within a highly active seismic region. Three Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones are located in Temecula: Wildomar, Willard, and Wolf Valley. These zones have been delineated by the State Geologist and encompass the area on either side CITY OF TEMECULA GLNERAL PLAN HBK-112 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT of potentially or recently active fault traces where the potential for surface rupture exists. The Wildomar fault is the predominant fault in the City. This fault trends in a northwest direction and transects the length of the City. The Willard fault is located southwest of the Wildomar fault zone. South of the Willard fault is the Wolf Valley fault zone. Within an Alquist-Priolo earthquake fault zone, habitable structures must maintain a minimum 50-foot setback distance from the fault trace per state law. The existence of Alquist-Priolo zones in Temecula effectively limits the amount of land and the intensity of development of residential uses adjacent to these zones. However, only a few vacant residential sites designated for Very Low Density Residential use are impacted by these Alquist-Priolo zones. Faults and Fault Zones: The Elsinore and Wildomar faults and their associated fault zones extend through the western side of the City on a northwest -southeast alignment across I-15. Although the Elsinore fault zone is one of the largest in Southern California, it has been one of the quietest. The southeastern extension of the Elsinore fault zone, the Laguna Salada fault, ruptured in 1892 in a magnitude 7.0 earthquake, but, as noted in the City's General Plan Public Safety Element, the main trace of the Elsinore fault zone has only seen one historical event greater than magnitude 5.2. In 1920, a magnitude 6.0 earthquake near Temescal Valley produced no known surface rupture. Other faults that surround Temecula include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, San Gabriel, Newport -Inglewood, and San Clemente Island faults. The Elsinore fault and fault zones extend through several vacant developable land parcels, as well as through a large underutilized residential parcel. Liquefaction: Liquefaction can occur as a secondary effect of seismic shaking during an earthquake or another event significant enough to cause equivalent pressure on the susceptible soils, like a dam failure and inundation. Liquefaction is unlikely to occur unless the earthquake is large with multiple shaking cycles. Liquefaction occurs in areas of saturated, loose, fine- to medium -grained soils where the water table is 50 feet or less below the ground surface. Seismic shaking temporarily eliminates the grain -to -grain support normally provided by the sediment grains. The waters between the grains assume the weight of the overlying material and the sudden increase in pore water pressure results in the soil losing its friction properties. The saturated material (with the frictionless properties of a liquid) will fail to support overlying structures. Liquefaction -related effects include loss of bearing strength, ground oscillations, lateral spreading, and slumping. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-113 In Temecula, liquefaction zones generally align with areas in the City subject to 100-year and 500-year floods and the areas subject to inundation if a nearby dam is breached. The liquefaction zones are, however, more far-reaching. Although only a few underutilized residential properties are located in areas subject to liquefaction, many vacant and developed properties are located within or immediately adjacent to areas subject to liquefaction. Liquefaction and other seismic -related issues are addressed by the state Universal Building Code (UBC). The UBC requirements for construction in liquefaction zones are not significantly more costly than standard California construction standards and will not compromise the City's ability to provide adequate sites to accommodate its RHNA. In addition, the City analyzes and mitigates for liquefaction constraints when applicable. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA): Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Areas encroach at the City's western and southern boundaries, encompassing or partially encompassing several large vacant developable parcels, including the Altair Specific Plan. As included in the Altair Specific Plan, the project's Western Bypass will serve as a fire break between wildland areas and new development. In addition, a Fuel Modification Plan was be prepared as part of the project and incorporated into the Altair Specific Plan to identify appropriate structure setbacks and landscape requirements for the interior of the project to address this hazard. Also, the project is required to adhere to all fire suppression requirements in accordance with the most recent Uniform Fire Code, which provides minimum fire safety measures that would be incorporated into all building designs. With these mitigation measures, residential development is permitted to occur throughout the Altair project area and is not considered a constraint to development. Hazardous Waste Sites: Small hazardous waste sites are located along and near the west side of I-15. These sites encompass small portions of vacant developable land and are near several vacant developable parcels. None of underutilized residential properties are located on or near hazardous waste sites. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP): Encompassing the western one-third of Riverside County and approximately 1.26 million acres, the Western Riverside County MSHCP is a comprehensive, multi -jurisdictional habitat conservation plan (HCP) designed to conserve species and their habitats. The goal is to maintain biological and ecological diversity within an increasingly urbanized area. The MSHCP includes areas in northern, western, and southern Temecula. Nearly all of the vacant CITY OF TLMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-114 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT developable parcels located west of I-15 in western Temecula are within the MSHCP criteria cell and core linkage areas, as are all parcels located in the southwestern corner of the City. Additional vacant developable parcels in the northeast corner of the City are also located in the MSHCP criteria cell and core linkage areas. Few underutilized residential properties are located in the MSHCP criteria cell and core linkage areas. Riparian Areas: Riparian areas are locales that relate to the bank of a stream, river, or lake. In Temecula, riparian areas encompass southern cottonwood -willow riparian and riparian scrub communities. These communities are limited to an area west of I-15 and an area in the southeast corner of the City. No vacant developable land or underutilized parcels are located in riparian areas. Although a few vacant developable parcels are located immediately adjacent to a riparian area, no underutilized parcels are located in or near a riparian area. Archaeological, Historic, and Native American Cultural Resources: Temecula has a rich history with many Native American Traditional Cultural Properties, villages and resources, places where significant events occurred, both historically and pre -historically, and historic buildings and locales identified within and surrounding its boundaries. While a large majority of these historic and pre -historic and resources have been formally recorded, there are still properties that contain buried cultural and archaeological resources and unrecorded structures. Because of the confidentiality of these resources, especially archaeological and Native American sites, the city will follow State law requirements with regards to analysis of these resources and consultation with local tribes. V` Q CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-115 V. HOUSING RESOURCES A. Regional Housing Need 1. Temecula's Regional Housing Need The City of Temecula falls under the jurisdiction of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). SCAG is responsible for developing a Regional Housing Needs Plan (RHNP) allocating the region's share of the statewide housing needs to lower -level councils of governments, which then allocate the needs to cities and counties in the region. The Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) is a minimum projection of additional housing units needed to accommodate projected household growth of all income levels by the end of the Housing Element's statutory planning period. This RHNA covers an 8-year planning period (2021 through 2029) and is divided into four income categories: very low, low, moderate, and above moderate. Pursuant to AB 2634, local jurisdictions are also required to project the housing needs of extremely low income households (0-30% AMI). In estimating the number of extremely low income households, a jurisdiction can use 50% of the very low income allocation; therefore, the City's very low income RHNA of 1,359 units can be split into 680 extremely low income and 678 very low income units Table 58 shows the breakdown of the 4,193 units in Temecula's RHNA into the required income categories. Table 58: Regional Housing Need Allocation, 2021-2029 Income Category Allocation Percentage Extremely Low 680 16% NIL Very Low 679 16% Low 801 19% Moderate 778 19% Above Moderate 1,255 30% Total 4,193 100% SOURCE: SCAG RHNP, 2020 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-116 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT B. Progress Towards the RHNA Since the RHNA uses June 30, 2021 as the baseline for growth projections for the 2021-2029 planning period, jurisdictions may count toward the RHNA housing units that have been developed, are under construction, and/or have received their building permits after June 30, 2021. Since this time, 27 housing units have been developed, are under construction, or have received their building permits in Temecula. Jurisdictions may also count projects that are approved/entitled but not yet built or under construction. While the City of Temecula is actively reviewing a number of project proposals, for the purposes of identifying process towards meeting the City's RHNA, the City has included two approved affordable projects (Las Haciendas and Rancho Highlands) that are expected to begin construction by the end of 2021. These two projects represent 132 affordable housing units, including 24 units affordable to extremely low income households, 8 units affordable to very low income households, and 99 units affordable to low income households. All affordable units are deed restricted. These credits towards meeting the City's RHNA are specified in Table 59, and the relative affordability of each unit type/project is described below. Table 59: Progress Towards Meeting the 2021-2029 RHNA Extremely Low income (0- 30% AMI) Very Low income (30-50% AMI) Low income (51- 80% AMI) Moderate income (81-120% AMI) Above Moderate income (121%+ AMI) Total Units Constructed/Under Construction/Building Permits Issued since June 30, 2021 Various Single -Family Units 0 0 0 0 6 6 Various Condos/Duplex/Town homes 0 0 0 21" 0 21 Subtotal 0 0 0 21' 6 27 Approved/Entitled Units Not Yet Under Construction Las Haciendas 24 8 44 0 1 77 Rancho Highlands 0 0 55 0 0 55 Subtotal 24 8 99 0 0 132 Total 0 24" 8"" 99— 21 7 159 Source: City of Temecula, 2021. *Note: These units do not have affordability restrictions. Market rate rents and sale prices for apartments and condominiums fall within levels affordable to the households earning moderate incomes (81-120%AMI) and are allocated as such. **Note: Units identified as affordable to extremely and very low and low income households are all deed restricted. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-117 1. Affordability of Units Credited Towards the RHNA Units credited towards the RHNA are distributed among the four affordability groups (extremely/very low, low, moderate, and above moderate) based on affordability restrictions (as is the case with affordable housing projects) or housing cost for those specific types of units based on real home rental/sale rates and established affordability levels. For example, the market rate rents and sale prices for apartments and condominiums in Temecula fall within levels affordable to households earning moderate incomes (81-120% AMI) and are allocated as such, as discussed in the above Housing Affordability by Income Level discussion. Based on rental data information from Zillow.com and Apartments.com, the average rents reported for Temecula $1,632 for 1-bedroom apartments, $1,816 for 2-bedroom apartments, and $2,290 for apartments with three or more bedrooms. Based on this data and the housing affordability thresholds shown in the Needs Assessment, these apartment unit sizes are affordable to 4-person moderate income (81-120% AMI) households (where the affordable monthly rent is $2,259), and the smaller apartment units (1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units) are affordable to 2-person moderate income (51-80% AMI) households (where the affordable monthly rent is $1,808). Actual unit affordability will vary greatly based on unit size and household size. However, because the City cannot predict the profile of household size and unit size, all multifamily rental units are credits towards meeting the City's moderate income RHNA, even though some units may ultimately be affordable to lower -income households depending on the household size and unit size. Condominium units are considered entry-level homes and based on pricing are allocated as affordable to moderate income households. According to Zillow.com, in February 2020 the median price for condominiums sold in the City was $360,000. While home prices have risen since April 2020 as a direct result of impacts of COVID-19 on the housing market, the average cost identified in April 2020 generally represents the "business -as -usual" model and provides a more realistic understanding of the long-term pricing trends associated with housing in Temecula, outside of the COVID-19 pandemic. This price is approximately equal to the affordability level for a 4- person, moderate income family and is allocated as such. As the maximum affordable price for a 4-person, moderate income family to purchase a home (as shown in the Needs Assessment) is $360,740, if condominiums continue to be priced higher than pre -pandemic values, the City may need to update its site inventory to reflect a high proportion of multifamily for -sale units being affordable to above moderate income households, versus moderate income households. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-118 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT However, as demonstrated later in this chapter, the City has identified a surplus of approximately 3,300 moderate income units and could easily accommodate a change in affordability level from moderate to above moderate income levels. The market rate cost of single-family units is considered affordable to above moderate income households. 2. Units Constructed or Under Construction According to City building permit records, since June 30, 2021, 27 new units have been constructed, are under construction, or have building permits pulled in Temecula, of which 21 are affordable to moderate income households based on market rate rents, and the remaining 6 units are affordable to above -moderate income households. 3. Units Approved/Entitled Based on City records, 159 units have recently been approved in Temecula; these units are not currently under construction but are expected to come online during the planning period. Of these 159 units, 32 will be deed -restricted affordable to extremely low/ very low income households and 99 will be deed -restricted to low income households. 4. Remaining RHNA Even in the short timeframe between the beginning of the planning period Quly 1, 2021) and preparation of this Housing Element (August 2021), the City has already demonstrated progress towards meeting its overall RHNA with housing units constructed, under construction, or approved/entitled or under review (159 units). Table 60: Remaining RHNA Extremely Very Low Moderate Above Total Low Low income income Moderate income (0- income (51- (81-120% income 30% AMI) (30-50% 80% AMI) (121%+ AMI) AMI) AMI) RHNA Allocation 680 679 801 778 1,255 4,193 Constructed, Under 0 0 0 21 6 27 Construction/Permits Issued (Since 6/30/2021) Units Approved/Entitled 24 8 99 0 0 132 Remaining Allocation 1 656 671 702 757 1,249 4,034 Source: City of Temecula, 2021, SCAG, 2020 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-119 C. Sites for Housing Development Housing element law requires an inventory of land suitable for residential development (Government Code Section 65583(a)(3)). An important purpose of this inventory is to determine whether a jurisdiction has allocated sufficient land for the development of housing to meet the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need, including housing to accommodate the needs of all household income levels. This section provides an analysis of the land available within the City for residential development. In addition to assessing the quantity of land available to accommodate the City's total housing needs, this section also considers the availability of sites to accommodate a variety of housing types suitable for households with a range of income levels and housing needs. This Housing Element identifies vacant sites that would accommodate residential uses within Temecula. It is noted that Temecula also has underutilized sites (sites where a significant portion of the property is vacant and there is a potential for additional residential units) which may be suitable to accommodate future residential development; however, these sites are not necessary to accommodate the City's RHNA and are not included in this inventory. A citywide parcel database, aerial photos, and General Plan GIS data were used to located parcels for this update. This update also considered the viability of sites identified in the prior planning period, many of which continue to be suitable sites for future development due to their proximity to transportation facilities, public services, goods, amenities, and activity centers. Parcel acreages by land use designation are based on assessor and GIS data. 1. Housing Affordable to Lower -Income Households The California Government Code states that if a local government has adopted density standards consistent with the population based criteria set by State law (at least 30 units per acre for Temecula), HCD is obligated to accept sites with those density standards (30 units per acre or higher) as appropriate for accommodating the jurisdictions share of regional housing need for lower -income households. Per Government Code Section 65583.2(c)(3)(B), sites designated with the City's Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) or Senior Housing Overlay (SHO) are consistent with the default density standard (30 units per acre) for metropolitan jurisdictions such as Temecula and therefore considered appropriate to accommodate housing for lower -income households; further, application of the AHO in and of itself requires that at least 20% of the units be deed-restricted/reserved for CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-120 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT households earning no greater than 80% of the area median home (i.e., low, very low, and extremely low income households) and that affordable units must be developed concurrent with market rate units, thereby promoting economic integrating and affirmatively further fair housing. Therefore, the capacity of sites that allow development densities of at least 30 units per acre are credited toward the lower - income RHNA based on State law. As previously described, the City has also adopted 15 Specific Plans to guide growth and development across the community. Four of these Specific Plans —Old Town, Uptown, Harveston and Altair —include vacant land and together lay the foundation for the development of thousands of new residential units in a variety of formats and densities and provide for densities at levels high enough (more than 30 du/ac) to accommodate a portion of the City's lower income RHNA. While these Specific Plans use a combination of typical development standards and form -based standards to regulate development, each Specific Plan was adopted to encourage new residential development in creative formats to promote development of a variety of residential types and various income levels. Moreover, since these Specific Plans were adopted, projects have been proposed and approved in Specific Plan areas (i.e., Uptown and Old Town) with product types and densities consistent with providing housing affordable to lower -income households. Additionally, based on the City's history of producing and supporting the production of affordable housing, Temecula is confident that vacant parcels within Specific Plan areas can be developed at densities of at least 30 du/ac to help satisfy the City's remaining extremely, very low, and low income RHNA. These Specific Plans and their potential development capacities are described in more detail later in this chapter. 2. Sites to Accommodate Remaining RHNA The City of Temecula's 6th Cycle residential sites fall into three categories: 1. Accessory dwelling units 2. Residentially zoned vacant land exclusive of Specific Plan areas, and 3. Residentially zoned sites inside Specific Plans As described throughout this section, the City has sufficient land appropriately zoned for residential uses throughout community to accommodate its RHNA for the 2021-2029 planning period. Moreover, Temecula has a proven track record of supporting the development of affordable projects, working with affordable housing CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-121 developers, promoting home types that are affordable to lower -income households including multifamily projects and mixed -use developments, and addressing needs of the community's vulnerable populations including seniors. These sites are illustrated on Figure H- 1, Housing Sites Inventory, and detailed in Appendix A. Accessory Dwelling Units As of January 2020, newly adopted State of California legislation pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) went into effect. The legislation changes specifically amended Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22. In response to these legislative changes, the City of Temecula updated its zoning ordinance to be consistent with State law. The details of the City's Zoning Ordinance relevant to ADUs are included in the Constraints section of this Background Report. The City of Temecula approved 3 ADUs in 2018 and no ADUs in 2019. However, once the City updated its ADU ordinance in 2020 and began advertising the opportunity to develop ADUs in Temecula, at least 18 ADUs were approved. Now that the City has promoted the production of ADUs as a viable option to add housing stock to the City's existing neighborhoods, prepared public education material to inform the public about the opportunity to develop ADUs, is moving forward with preparing streamlined guidance to support efficient review and approval of ADU applications, and confirmed that ADUs are explicitly allowed within a SPA (Temecula has 15 Specific Plans), it can be reasonably expected that the development of ADUs in Temecula will continue to be produced at the pace of production in 2020 and will likely accelerate. Moreover, the City has taken significant proactive steps to advertise the opportunity for residents to construct ADUs, including preparing a topic area fact sheet (available in English and Spanish), hosting presentations to the Planning Commission and City Council, and answering the public's questions in -person at City Hall and over the phone. The City has assumed production of ADUs at a rate of 18 units per year for the duration of the planning period (based on the number of ADUs approved in 2020), resulting in the assumed production of 144 ADUs. This is a modest assumption and production will likely outpace this target during the planning period. Additionally, the income level of these ADUs has been assumed to be consistent with the findings of SCAG's ADU affordability study, and the income of these units are allocated consistent with SCAG's findings for Riverside/San Bernardino Counties. 2. Vacant Residential Sites (Outside of Specific Plans) As part of this Housing Element update, the City conducted a parcel - by -parcel analysis of vacant residential sites for land outside of approved specific plans, based on data obtained from the City's CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-122 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT geographic information system (GIS). The vacant land inventory for the City of Temecula, including an estimated development capacity for the vacant parcels, can be found in Appendix A of the Housing Element. Table 61 summarizes the available housing unit capacity based on vacant residential sites located outside of approved specific plan areas. Residential capacity for each vacant parcel is based on the current zoning for each parcel. Each parcel is assumed to develop at 75% of its maximum capacity, which allows for setbacks, landscaping, right-of-way dedications, and other nonresidential uses. See Figure H- 1 for a map of these sites. Since the last planning period, the City adopted its Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO), which allows for an increase in density in the High, Medium, and Low Medium Residential zoning designations if the development is affordable housing, and also applies to specific parcels within the Planned Development Overlay areas (PDO-5 and PDO-10), Professional Office zone, and Uptown Specific Plan. The affordable overlay provides for a minimum density of at least 20 dwelling units per acre and up to 30 dwelling units per acre, excluding any potential density bonus for qualified projects. Development capacity at parcels designated with the Affordable Housing Overlay will allow for densities consistent with default densities of state housing element law and will therefore be appropriate to accommodate a portion of the City's lower income RHNA. Consistent with sites outside of the Affordable Housing Overlay, these parcels are also assumed to develop at 75% of their maximum capacity. Several commercial zoning districts throughout the City of Temecula also permit residential uses. The City's vacant land use survey identified all such vacant parcels and the realistic residential development capacity for each parcel if developed with residential uses. Table H-X also summarizes the residential development potential within currently vacant commercial parcels. Each parcel is assumed to develop at 75% of its maximum capacity. The inventory of vacant residential land greater than 0.50 acres in size (exclusive of those in specific plan areas) in Temecula totals 634 acres. It should be noted that the City's inventory does include vacant sites that are larger than 10 acres. The City has a long history of successfully subdividing large parcels into smaller developments resulting in the production of housing units at all income levels. This is discussed later in this chapter. These vacant properties, identified in Table H-X, have the potential to yield 3,430 units, 1,467 of which can accommodate lower -income housing, 1,600 can accommodate moderate -income housing, and 363 can accommodate above moderate -income housing. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-123 Table 61: Vacant Residential Sites (Exclusive of Specific Plans) General Plan Zoning Max Acres Realistic Affordability Density Capacity (units)* Community Commercial Community 20 du/ac 20 301 Moderate Commercial — High Residential High 20 du/ac 4 79 Ex Low/Very Residential/ Low/Low AHO Highway Tourist Commercial Highway Tourist 20 du/ac 7 110 Moderate Commercial** Low Medium Residential Low Medium 6 du/ac 41 184 Above Mod Residential Low Residential Low Residential 2 du/ac 55 82 Above Mod Medium Density Residential Medium Density 30 du/ac 11 256 Ex Low/Very Residential/AHO Low/Low Medium Density Residential Medium Density 12 du/ac 99 708 Moderate Residential Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood 12 du/ac 6 57 Moderate Commercial** Professional Office Planned 30 du/ac 7 157 Ex Low/Very Development Low/Low Overlay-5/AHO Professional Office Professional 30 du/ac 13 300 Ex Low/Very Office/AHO Low/Low Public Institutional Planned 30 du/ac 30 675 Ex Low/Very Development Low/Low Overlay-5/AHO Service Commercial Service 20 du/ac 28 423 Moderate Commercial** Very Low Residential Very Low 0.40 du/ac 321 96 Above Mod Residential Total 643 3,430 Source: City of Temecula, 2021 * Dwelling unit calculation is based on 75% ofpotential maximum capacity. ** Senior housing is also allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial, Service Commercial, and Highway/Tourist Commercial zoning districts. Senior housing constructed in the Neighborhood Commercial zone will be developed to be consistent with the development and performance standards allowed in the Medium Density Residential zoning district. For the Community Commercial, Service Commercial, and Highway/Tourist Commercial zoning districts, senior housing will be developed consistent with the development and performance standards allowed for the High Density Residential zoning district. 2. Vacant Residential Sites within Specific Plans The City conducted a records search and visual survey using aerial photos and site visits to estimate the remaining residential development capacity by number and type of housing within the approved specific plans. The City has 15 approved Specific Plan; nine have vacant land with residential development capacity remaining. Five of the nine Specific Plans with remaining residential capacity (Old Town, Wolf Creek, Harveston, Uptown, and Altair) allow for development at densities of at least 30 du/ac, which is appropriate to accommodate a portion of the City's lower income RHNA. While the exact affordability levels for CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-124 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT future development within these Specific Plan areas will be based on available funding for affordable development and other market conditions as the sites develop during the planning period, for those Specific Plans which allow for development of at least 30 du/ac, the City has assumed that some percentage of units will be affordable to lower income households, some percentage to moderate income households, and some percentage to above moderate income households. For those Specific Plans the allow for lower densities not suitable to accommodate the City's lower income RHNA, affordability levels are based on the market rate rents/sale prices of products with similar densities built and rented/sold elsewhere in the City. The inventory of vacant residential land greater than 0.50 acres in size within approved Specific Plans in Temecula totals 784 acres. It should be noted that some of these sites are larger than 10 acres. The City has a long history of successfully subdividing large parcels into smaller developments resulting in the production of housing units at all income levels. This is discussed later in this chapter. These vacant properties, identified in Table 62, have the potential to yield 5,773 units, 1,247 of which can accommodate lower -income housing, 2,787 can accommodate moderate -income housing, and 1,724 can accommodate above moderate -income housing. In Temecula, Specific Plan areas have historically developed to at least 95% of their total entitlement. However, for purposes of identifying adequate sites to accommodate its RHNA, the City has assumed that Specific Plan areas will develop at 85% of their capacity. Given that Specific Plans inherently include programs to develop sites effectively and efficiently at the densities and intensities identified within the Plan, and given the City's history of successful Specific Plan development at levels consistent with nearly the maximum allowable development levels, this is a reasonable expectation for the City's remaining vacant land in Specific Plan areas. Table 62: Vacant Residential Land within Specific Plan Areas Specific Plan General Allowable Acres Realistic Affordability Plan Land Density Capacity Use (units)* SP-2 - Rancho Highlands Highway Tourist 20 du/ac 1 5 Above Mod Commercial SP-4 - Paloma Del Sol Low Medium 6 du/ac 42 216 Above Mod Residential Specific Plan 30 du/ac 4 109 Ex Low/Very SP-5 - Old Town Low/Low/Mod/ Above Mod SP-9 - Red Hawk Medium 12 du/ac 7 68 Moderate Residential SP-11 - Roripaugh Low 2-12 du/ac 333 1,928 Moderate/ Above Residential, Mod CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-125 Low Medium, Medium Residential, Neighborhood Commercial SP-12 - Wolf Creek Community 20-30 du/ac 20 439 Moderate Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial SP-13 - Harveston Service 30 du/ac 80 846 Ex Low/Very Commercial Low/Low/Mod/ Above Mod SP-14 - Uptown Highway Tourist 30 du/ac 25 648 Ex Low/Very Commercial, Low/Low/Mod/ Industrial Park, Above Mod Service Commercial SP-15 — Altair Medium 30 du/ac 272 1,1,515 Ex Low/Very Residential, Low/Low/Mod/ High Above Mod Residential, Specific Plan Total 4 5,773 Source: City of Temecula, 2021 * Dwelling unit calculation is based on 85% ofpotential maximum capacity ,11 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-126 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Figure 2: Vacant Developable Land Use Zoning IHV Zoning Designations BUSINESS PARK (BP) - COMMUNITY COMM (CC) CONSERVATION(OS-C) - HIGH DENSITY RES (H) - HIGHWAY/TOURIST COMM (HT) O LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (L) 0 LOW DENSITY RES (L-1) - LOW DENSITY RES (L-2) O LOW MED DENSITY RES (LM) 0 MEDIUM DENSITY RES (M) 0 NEIGHBORHOOD COMM (NC) A PLANNED DEV OVERLAY (PDO-5) - PLANNED DEV OVERLAY (PDO-10) - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL (PI) - SERVICE COMMERCIAL (SC) SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-1) SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-2) SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-4) M SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) M SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-7) M SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-9) M SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) M SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-12) M SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-13) - SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-14) - SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-15) SVERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) City 1i Centedine L7 HOT SPRINGS hi 0 0.5 1 Miles I I I I I 3. Large Sites Analysis The City's site inventory (Appendix A) includes ten parcels that are over 10 acres in size that allow for a density of at least 30 du/ac and are found to be suitable sites to accommodate a portion of the City's lower income RHNA. Of these ten sites, four are between 10 and 11 acres (10.20, 10.23, 10.26, and 10.84 acres). The remaining six parcels range in size from 11.39 acres to 54.8 acres. Seven of the ten sites are located within approved Specific Plans which include processes for subdividing parcels into developable lots. The City has a proven track record of developing Specific Plans, including the subdivision of large lots, as evidence by the development of approved Specific Plans including Uptown (where one affordable housing projects were recently approved), Harveston (which is largely developed but was recently amended to allow for additional residential development), Old Town Specific Plan (where one affordable housing project was approved), Rancho Highlands Specific Plan (the location of the Arrive affordable housing project), and various other residential Specific Plans. The remaining three sites that are not located within a Specific Plan are all designated with the City's Affordable Housing Overlay, which specifies that residential development at these sites must include the applicable affordable housing component to develop as a residential project, and that the assumed density for these sites in 30 du/ac. Two of these sites are owned by the City of Temecula, and as the parcel owner, the City is in a unique position to ensure that the property will be developed as affordable housing, despite its size. The City also has the ability to subdivide the property into smaller lots, if that process is more likely to result in the production of affordable units. The largest lots are included in SP-15 (Altair), which is the City's newest Specific Plan. As development moves forward within the Altair project area, it is expected that the existing parcels will be subdivided in compliance with the Specific Plan and its land use pattern, and that this process will replicate similar successful efforts in other Specific Plan areas which have been fully or partially developed throughout Temecula. Additionally, the developer of Altair has expressed interest in promoting and building accessory dwelling units in concert with new construction, further demonstrating the City's ability to accommodate a portion of its RHNA through development of ADUs. Moreover, only sites identified with the City's Affordable Housing Overlay are anticipated to develop as 100% affordable projects (at 75% of maximum capacity). Larger sites located in Specific Plan areas are expected to provide a range of housing options and a variety of income CITY OF TLMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-128 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT levels; it is not assumed that large sites in Specific Plan areas will develop as exclusively affordable to lower income households. Rather, approximately 40% of the capacity is projected to be suitable to accommodate lower income households with the remainder serving the needs of moderate to above moderate income households. Table 63: Large Lot Inventory Affordable Lower General Total Parcel Owner Size Zoning Housing Income Plan Capacity Overlay RHNA CITY OF Public 909370050 TEMECULA 10.84 Institutional PDO-10 Yes 244 244 Facilities CITY OF Public 909370049 TEMECULA 19.14 Institutional PDO-10 Yes 431 431 Facilities 916400042 HARVESTON 10.21 Service SP-13 No 43 108 SAB Commercial 916400060 HARVESTON 10.26 Service SP-13 No 44 109 SAB Commercial HUB 3 Medium 922210011 10.23 Residential (7- SP-15 No 50 126 12 Du/Ac Max) 940320002 CITY OF 20.34 Specific Plan SP-15 No 100 250 TEMECULA Implementation HUB 3 Medium 940320007 12.72 Residential (7- SP-15 No 62 156 12 Du/Ac Max) KAISERMAN Medium 944290015 DONALD 11.40 Residential (7- M Yes 256 256 12 Du/Ac Max) TEMECULA Specific Plan 940320005 WEST 19.61 Implementation SP-15 No 96 241 VILLAGE TEMECULA Specific Plan 922210049 WEST 54.81 Implementation SP-15 No 270 675 VILLAGE Source: City of Temecula, 2021 7. Adequacy of Sites for RHNA ~' The City's site inventory demonstrates the availability of adequate sites to address the projected housing growth needs (see Appendix A). Overall, the vacant site inventory yields an estimated development capacity of 9,203 units. Based on these numbers, along with development of ADUs and the credits identified earlier in this chapter, and as shown in Table 64, the City is able to meet its 2021-2029 regional housing need of 4,193 and provide a surplus of sites at all income levels. Additionally, given that the capacities identified for vacant residential parcels outside of Specific Plan is based on a 75% yield from the maximum density and for vacant residential parcels inside of Specific Plans is based on 85% yield from the maximum CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-129 density, it could be expected that products will actually develop with unit counts higher than those assumed in this inventory. As is shown in Table 64, the City has adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA for all income levels. For lower income units (extremely low income, very low income, and low income), the City has a remaining allocation of 2,029 units and can accommodate 2,798 units via ADUs and on sites that allow densities of at least 30 units per acre, consistent with the assumptions for lower income sites established by Government Code Section 65583.2(c) (3) (B) (iii) and that are further supported by the City's history of successful affordable projects. The City also has a surplus of sites for moderate and above moderate income units. Table 64: Comparison of RHNA Candidate Sites Realistic Capacity and RHNA Candidate Extremely Very Low Low Moderate Above Total Sites Low income income income income Moderate (0-30% AMI) (30-50% (51-80% (81-120% income AMI) AMI) AMI) (121%+ AMI) Remaining 6th Cycle RHNA 656 671 702 757 1,249 4,034 ADUs 22 11 50 50 11 144 Vacant Residential Land Inventory 367 440 660 1,600 363 3,430 (exclusive of SPAs) Vacant Residential Land 312 312 624 2,787 1,724 5,773 in Specific Plans Total +45 (surplus) +92 (surplus) +632 +3,680(surplus) +849 (surplus) +5,313 (surplus) (surplus) C. Housing, Financial, and Services Resources Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program (AHSCI funds land use, housing, transportation, and land preservation projects that support infill and compact development and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Funds are available in the form of loans and/or grants in two kinds of project areas: Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Project Areas and Integrated Connectivity JCP) Project Areas. There is an annual competitive funding cycle. Community Development Block Grants (CDBG� funds are awarded to the City of Temecula, an entitlement community, on a formula basis for housing, community development, and economic development CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-130 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT activities. Activities eligible for CDBG funding include acquisition, rehabilitation, economic development and public services. HOME Investment Partnership funds are granted by a formula basis from HUD to increase the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing to lower income households. Eligible activities include new construction, acquisition, rental assistance and rehabilitation. The City participates in the San Diego County - administered HOME Program, which administers HOME funds to projects in participating jurisdictions. County -administered HOME funds for first time homebuyer assistance are made available to residents or employees of the local jurisdictions participating in the HOME program. New development projects are typically allocated funding on a competitive basis. Housing Choice Voucher Program (formerly Section 8provides monthly rental assistance payments to private landlords on behalf of low income families who have been determined eligible by the San Diego Housing Authority. The program's objective is to assist low income families by providing rental assistance so that families may lease safe, decent, and sanitary housing units in the private rental market. The program is designed to allow families to move without the loss of housing assistance. Moves are permissible if the family notifies the Housing Authority ahead of time, terminates its existing lease within the lease provisions, and finds acceptable alternate housing. Project Based Housing Voucher program is a component of the former Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program funded through HUD. The program's objective is to induce property owners to make standard housing available to low income families at rents within the program limits. In return, the Housing Authority or HUD enters a contract with the owner that guarantees a certain level of rents. Section 811 /202 Program (Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities/Elderl)� — Non- profit and consumer cooperatives can receive no interest capital advances from HUD under the Section 202 program for the construction of Very -Low income rental housing for '40�N�LNI seniors and persons with disabilities. These funds can be used in conjunction with Section 811, which can be used to develop group homes, independent living facilities and immediate care facilities. Eligible activities include acquisition, rehabilitation, new construction and rental assistance. California Housing Finance Agency (Ca1HFA) Multifamily Pro provide permanent financing for the acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation or new construction of rental housing that includes affordable rents for Low and Moderate income families and individuals. One of the programs is the Preservation Acquisition Finance Program that is designed to facilitate the acquisition of at -risk CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-131 affordable housing developments and provide lowcost funding to preserve affordability. CalHOME Program provides grants to local public agencies and non- profit developers to assist households in becoming homeowners. CalHome funds may be used for predevelopment, development, acquisition, and rehabilitation costs as well as downpayment assistance. While Ca1HOME funding has been limited to disaster assistance in recent years, this would be an appropriate program for the City to pursue to begin to develop a local portfolio of housing assistance programs and funds. California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA� offers permanent financing for acquisition and rehabilitation to for -profit, non-profit, and public agency developers seeking to preserve "at -risk" housing units. In addition, CHFA offers low interest predevelopment loans to nonprofit sponsors through its acquisition/rehabilitation program. Emergency Housing and Assistance Program HAP provides funds to local government agencies and non-profit corporations for capital development activities and facility operation for emergency shelters, transitional housing and safe havens that provide shelter and supportive services for homeless individuals and families. No current funding is offered for this program. Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) Program provides emergency shelter and related services to the County's homeless populations. Eligible activities include: the rehabilitation and conversion of buildings for use as emergency shelters; the provision of essential services to the homeless; operating support for emergency shelters; and homeless prevention/rapid rehousing activities. Federal Home Loan Bank System facilitates Affordable Housing Programs (AHP), which subsidize the interest rates for affordable housing. The San Francisco Federal Home Loan Bank District provides local service within California. Interest rate subsidies under the AHP can be used to finance the purchase, construction, and/or rehabilitation of rental housing. very low income households must occupy at least 20% of the units for the useful life of the housing or the mortgage term. Housing for a Healthy California (HHC) provides funding on a competitive basis to deliver supportive housing opportunities to developers using the federal National Housing Trust Funds (NHTF) allocations for operating reserve grants and capital loans. The Department will also utilize from a portion of moneys collected in calendar year 2018 and deposited into the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund to provide funding through grants to counties for capital and operating assistance. Funds will be announced through a Notice of Funding Availability. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-132 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Infill Infrastructure Grant Program (IIG� funds infrastructure improvements to facilitate new housing development with an affordable component in residential or mixed use infill projects and infill areas. If an affordable or special needs housing developer is interested in developing in the City's urban core, this program could be useful to fund infrastructure improvements. Joe Serna Jr. Farmworker Housing Grant Program finances the new construction, rehabilitation and acquisition of owner- and renter - occupied housing units for agricultural workers, with a priority for lower income households. No current funding is offered for this program. Low income Housing Tax Credits. The California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (CTCAQ administers the federal and state Low income Housing Tax Credit Programs. Both programs were created to encourage private investment in affordable rental housing for households meeting certain income requirements. Under these programs, housing tax credits are awarded to developers of qualified projects. 20% of federal credits are reserved for rural areas, and 10% for non-profit sponsors. To compete for the credit, rental housing developments must reserve units at affordable rents to households at or below 46% of area median income. The assisted units must be reserved for the target population for 55 years. The federal tax credit provides a subsidy over ten years towards the cost of producing a unit. Developers sell these tax benefits to investors for their present market value to provide up -front capital to build the units. Credits can be used to fund the hard and soft costs (excluding land costs) of the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of rental housing. Projects not receiving other federal subsidy receive a federal credit of 9% per year for ten years and a state credit of 30% over four years (high cost areas and qualified census tracts get increased federal credits). Projects with a federal subsidy receive a 4% federal credit each year for ten years and a 13% state credit over four years. The CTCAC also administers a Farmworker Housing Assistance Program and a Commercial 46, Revitalization Deduction Program. Low income Housing Preservation and Residential Home Ownership Act (IHPRHA) requires that all eligible HUD Section 236 and Section 221(d) projects "at -risk" of conversion to market -rate rental housing through the mortgage prepayment option be subject to LIHPRHA Incentives. The incentives to owners include HUD subsidies which guarantee owners an 8% annual return on equity. Owners must file a Plan of Action to obtain incentives or offer the project for sale to a) non-profit organizations, b) tenants, or c) public bodies for a 12 month period followed by an additional three-month sale to other purchasers. Only then are owners eligible to prepay the subsidized mortgages. Mobilehome Park Rehabilitation and Resident Ownership Program (MPRROP� makes short- and long-term low interest rate loans for the CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-133 preservation of affordable mobilehome parks for ownership or control by resident organizations, nonprofit housing sponsors, or local public agencies. MPRROP also makes long-term loans to individuals to ensure continued affordability. Funds are made available through a periodic, competitive process. MPRROP is currently accepting applications on an over-the-counter basis. Multifamily Housing Program HP) provides low interest loans to developers of affordable rental and transitional housing projects. Funds may be used for new construction, rehabilitation, acquisition and rehabilitation, or conversion of non-residential structures. National Housing Trust Fund is a permanent federal program with dedicated sources of funding not subject to the annual appropriations. The funds can be used to increase and preserve the supply of affordable housing, with an emphasis on rental housing for extremely low income households. California is receiving approximately $10.1 Million for the program in 2019. Funds will be made available through a competitive process and will be announced through a Notice of Funding Availability. Preservation Interim Repositioning Program IRP) is a short-term loan program designed to preserve housing at risk of conversion to market rates. Only non -profits, dedicated to the provision of affordable housing, may apply. Local matching funds, together with PIRP funds, may not exceed 20% of total costs. No current funding is offered for this program. SB 2 Planning Grants Program provides one-time funding and technical assistance to all eligible local governments in California to adopt, and implement plans and process improvements that streamline housing approvals and accelerate housing production. Eligible activities include updating a variety of planning documents and processes such as general plans and zoning ordinances, conducting environmental analyses, and process improvements that expedite local planning and permitting. The planning grants program is funded through the Building Homes and Jobs Act Trust Fund (SB 2, Chapter 364, Statutes AiOW of 2017). The City is eligible to receive funds through this program and this program should be considered to develop an affordable housing program for the City. California Community Reinvestment Corporation (CCRC) is a multifamily affordable housing lender whose mission is to increase the availability of affordable housing for Low income families, seniors and residents with special needs by facilitating private capital flow from its investors for debt and equity to developers of affordable housing. Eligible activities include new construction, rehabilitation and acquisition of properties. Supplement Security Income (SSI) is a federal welfare program for persons 65 and over and for blind or disabled persons of any age. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-134 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT "Disabled" means that you have a physical or mental disability that is expected to keep you from working for 12 months or longer, or will result in death. Medicare is a federal health insurance program for people who are 65 and over, for some younger people with permanent disabilities, and for people with end -stage kidney disease. SSI may provide total monthly income or it may supplement a low income. In addition to cash payments, SSI recipients are automatically covered by Medi-Cal, the state health insurance plan. D. Administrative Resources Agencies with administrative capacity to implement programs contained in the Housing Element include the City of Temecula and local and regional nonprofit private developers. The City of Temecula Planning Department takes the lead in implementing Housing Element programs and policies. The City also works closely with non-profit developers to expand affordable housing opportunities in Temecula. Development Services Department The Community Development Department manages the City's affordable housing programs, Building and Safety Division, code enforcement, land development, and planning (among other responsibilities). The department coordinates development activity within the City to ensure the planned orderly growth. The Planning Department administers the General Plan and zoning and environmental regulations, and provides primary staff assistance to the Planning Commission. Non -Profit Developments The City collaborates with a number of affordable housing developers and service providers to accommodate the housing needs of Temecula residents. The following are housing developers and service providers IN active in the City; several are included in the State's list of entities with the legal and managerial capacity to acquire and manage at -risk projects. The following are housing providers interested in developing and/or preserving affordable housing in the City: • Coachella Valley Housing Coalition 45-701 Monroe Street, Suite G Indio, CA 92201 Telephone: (760) 347-3157 • Habitat for Humanity 41964 Main Street Temecula, CA 92591 Telephone: (909) 693-0460 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-135 • Jamboree Housing Corporation 2081 Business Center Drive, Suite 216 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (949) 263-8676 • Affirmed Housing 13520 Evening Creek Drive North, Suite 360 San Diego, CA 92128 Telephone: (858)679-2828 • The Olson Company 30200 Old Ranch Pkwy, #250 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Telephone: (562) 596-4770 • San Diego Community Housing Corporation 8799 Balboa Avenue, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92123 Telephone: (858) 571-0444 • D'Alto Partners NN 41911 5th Street Temecula, CA 92590 Telephone: (951)304-0633 • DR Horton 2280 Warlow Circle, Suite 100 Corona, CA 92880 Telephone: (951)272-9000 • Bridge Housing Corporation 9191 Towne Center Drive, Suite L101 San Diego, CA 92122 Telephone: (858) 535-0552 • Highland Partnerships 285 Bay Blvd. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Telephone: (619) 498-2900 • National Community Renaissance (National CORE) 9421 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone: (909) 483-2444 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-136 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT E. Environmental Constraints The majority of the land available for residential development is located adjacent to existing infrastructure facilities or within a specific plan area where infrastructure will be provided as part of the development process. As a result, infrastructure facilities will be able to serve all of the future residential development. The sites inventory analysis reflects land use designations and densities established in the General Plan and Specific Plans. Thus, any environmental constraints that would lower the potential yield (e.g., steep slopes) have already been accounted for. Any additional constraints that would occur on a more detailed site review basis would be addressed as part of the individual project review process. The City's capacity to meet its regional share and individual income categories are not constrained by any environmental conditions. F. Energy Conservation and Climate Change Energy -related housing costs can directly impact the affordability of housing. While State building code standards contain mandatory energy efficiency requirements for new development, the City and utility providers are also important resources to encourage and facilitate energy conservation and to help residents minimize energy -related expenses. Efficient energy use can be encouraged by changing customer behavior, rewarding use of energy -saving appliances, and employing building design and construction approaches that reduce electric power and natural gas usage. The primary sources of energy in Temecula are electricity from Southern California Edison (SCE) and natural gas from SoCalGas. SCE provides technical assistance and incentives for residents and businesses to increase energy efficiency through energy audits, appliance rebate programs, and smart energy metering. As part of the City's Sustainability Plan, Temecula's mission is to reduce energy use while encouraging clean energy generation. New Development The City encourages energy conservation in residential projects. New subdivision and parcel reviews are considered in terms of street layout and lot design. Residential structures must meet the requirements of Title 24 (CalGreen) relating to energy conservation features of the California Building Standards Code. For example, production home builder, Woodside Homes has constructed hundreds of homes in Roripaugh Ranch (Sommers Bend) which include solar as well as passive and active energy savings techniques. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-137 Retrofit There are a number of methods available to improve conditions of existing structures and to decrease their energy demand, all of which fall under the general label of "retrofit." Among the most common techniques for increasing building efficiency are: insulation of ceilings, heating -ventilating air conditioning ducts and hot water heaters; weather stripping and caulking; night setback thermostats; spark ignited pilot lights; low flow shower heads; window treatment to provide shade; and furnace efficiency modifications. The City of Temecula monitors such modifications on substantial rehabilitation projects pursuant to the California Building Standards Code. Weatherization in existing dwellings can greatly cut down heating and cooling costs. Weatherization is generally done by performing or improving attic insulation, caulking, weather stripping and storm windows, furnace efficiency modifications, and certain mechanical measures to heating and cooling systems. The U.S. Department of Energy allocates money to states for disbursement to community - based organizations. Other means of energy conservation in residential structures includes proper design and location of windows, window shades, orientation of the dwelling in relation to sun and wind direction, and roof overhang to let the winter sun in and block the summer sun out. The City encourages maintenance and rehabilitation of housing to maximize energy efficiency. The City's residential rehabilitation programs provides funding assistance for lower income households to rehabilitate their home and provide weatherization and energy retrofit improvements. ING. Consistency with the General Plan Government Code Section 65300.5 states: "In construing the A4%NL provisions of this article, the Legislature intends that the general plan and elements and parts thereof comprise an integrated, internally consistent and compatible statement of policies for the adopting agency." Additionally, Government Code Section 65583 (c)(7) requires the identification of "means by which consistency will be achieved with other general plan elements and community goals." The Housing Element of a general plan sets out a city's overall long- range planning strategy for providing housing for all segments of the community. The California Government Code requires general plans to contain an integrated, consistent set of goals and policies. The Housing Element is, therefore, affected by policies contained in other elements of a general plan. The housing element is most intricately CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-138 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT related to the land use element. The Land Use Element establishes the framework for development of housing by laying out the land use designations for residential development and indicating the type and density permitted by a city. Working within this framework, the City of Temecula's Housing Element identifies priority goals, objectives, and program actions for the 2021-2029 planning period that directly address the housing needs of Temecula's existing and future residents. The policies contained in other elements of the City's General Plan affect many aspects of life that residents enjoy such as the amount and variety of open space; the preservation of natural, historic and cultural resources; permitted noise levels in residential areas; and the safety of the residents in the event of a natural or man-made disaster. The Housing Element has been reviewed for consistency with the City's other General Plan Elements and the policies and programs in this Element do not conflict with the policy direction contained in other parts of the General Plan. As the City moves forward with a General Plan Update and as portions of the General Plan are amended in the future, the Housing Element will be reviewed to ensure that internal consistency is maintained. The General Plan Update will address all requirements of State law related to the scope and content of a General Plan, including updated goals, policies, and programs to address complete streets, environmental justice, climate adaptation and resiliency, and air quality. H. Relationship to Other City Plans and Policies The Housing Element identifies priority goals, objectives, policies, and action programs for the next eight years that directly address the housing needs of Temecula. The City's other plans and policies including its Municipal Code, Zoning Code, Master Plan, and Specific Plans must all remain consistent with the Housing Element. As revisions are considered to the City's Code and various plans, each revision will be reviewed to ensure that no conflicts with the Housing Element occur. I. Priority for Water and Sewer Per Chapter 727, Statues of 2004 (SB 1087), upon completion of an amended or adopted housing element, a local government is responsible for immediately distributing a copy of the Element to area water and sewer providers. Water and sewer providers must grant priority for service allocations to proposed developments that include housing units affordable to lower -income households. As the responsible agency, the City of Temecula will supply a copy of the CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-139 adopted housing element to the Temecula Public Works Department, as well as to all water and sewer providers serving the City. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-140 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT VI. AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR Hous►NG (AFFH) ANfv.Ysls All Housing Elements due on or after January 1, 2021 must contain an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Final Rule of July 16, 2015. Under State law, affirmatively further fair housing means "taking meaningful actions, in addition to combatting discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics". These characteristics can include, but are not limited to, race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability. In 2017, the City of Temecula prepared a comprehensive and robust assessment of fair housing. This Report is included as Appendix D to the Housing Element and was approved in March 2017. Unless otherwise noted, the Figures and Tables references in this Section (Section VI) refer to those Figures and Tables included as part of the 2017 Assessment, included as Appendix D. As part of this effort, the City undertook a detailed community participation program, assessed past goals and actions, conducted a fair housing analysis including a demographic summary, identification of general issues related to segregation/integration, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs. Additionally, the Report included an analysis of publicly supported housing, disability and access, and fair housing enforcement, outreach capacity, and resource analysis. Finally, it included a series of fair housing goals and priorities, which have been integrated and updated within the Housing Plan, as appropriate. This analysis is a summary of the 2017 Report, the findings of which remain valid, as well as new information related to the City's 2021-2029 Housing Element, and in particular its sites inventory, and a description of how the City's housing programs affirmatively further fair housing. As a recipient of federal funds to administer housing and community development programs, the City of Temecula must affirmatively further fair housing. To accomplish this goal, the City of Temecula has contracted with the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County to provide fair housing services for Temecula residents at no cost. Citizens can get legal support for Fair Housing issues regarding rent payments, termination notices, lease renewal increases, habitability claims, illegal evictions, and any discrimination claim. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-141 A. Fair Housing Needs Assessment The City of Temecula is located in the extreme southwest corner of the Riverside -San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), which is the largest MSA in area in the continental United States. Because of its location in the corner of the region, one must be cautious to draw too many conclusions in comparing Temecula to the regional data supplied by HUD. The city's 2017 Assessment and the analysis included in this Housing Element compares and contrasts the City with the regional data, but as one would expect, there are some substantial differences in the data profiles and the needs between the City and the region. The City is located in a cluster of cities in Temecula Valley in southwest Riverside County. The other cities include Murrieta, Menifee, Wildomar and Lake Elsinore. All have experienced tremendous growth in the past twenty years, yet they remain separate and some distance from the metropolitan areas to the north and south. Through its growth, Temecula has remained an integrated and diverse City with racial and ethnic groups spread evenly throughout the City. There are no HUD -identified racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) in the City. During the housing crisis of 2007- 2008, the City was hit with many foreclosures and, as such, that issue was the greatest concern in the previous Analysis of Impediments, completed in 2010. Now with the housing industry in recovery, the greatest need in the City is affordable housing, as many new homebuyers find themselves priced out of the market. Like all cities in the State of California, Temecula is challenged by a lack of financial resources to address its affordable housing needs due to the dissolution of all the State's redevelopment agencies. This was the main source of hundreds of affordable housing units constructed in the Ni City since the 1990s. Fair housing issues in Temecula appear to be individualized and not systemic, but preventing systematic issues requires continuous training and education of those persons employed AO%NLL in the housing industry, as well as educating the residents of their fair housing rights. As included in its 2017 Assessment, the City had developed four fair housing goals to overcome the contributing factors identified in the Assessment of Fair Housing. These goals were prioritized based on feedback from community meetings, surveys, stakeholder interviews, staff, and data analysis. Highest priority was given to those contributing factors that limit or deny fair housing choice of access to opportunity. The goals are listed below, from highest to lowest priority. Goal 1: Amend Zoning Code to promote the development of affordable housing CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-142 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Fair Housing Issue(s): Disproportionate Housing Needs; Disparities in Access to Opportunity Contributing Factor 1A: Land use and zoning laws Goal2: Increase and preserve affordable units for renters and bomeowners Fair Housing Issue(s): Disproportionate Housing Needs; Disparities in Access to Opportunity Contributing Factor 2A: The availability of affordable units in a range of sizes Contributing Factor 2B: Location and type of affordable housing Goal 3: Provide greater access to public facilities and improvements for persons with disabilities Fair Housing Issue(s): Disparities in Access to Opportunity Contributing Factor 3A: Inaccessible sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, or other infrastructure Contributing Factor 3B: Inaccessible government facilities or services Goal4: Provide equal housing opportunities forprotected classes Fair Housing Issue(s): Disparities in Access to Opportunity Contributing Factor 4A: Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations Contributing Factor 4B: Private discrimination Based on the above goals and contributing factors, a number of actions were identified that can be taken over the next five years that will promote fair housing for its residents. These actions, outlined in the 2017 Assessment, have either already been completed (i.e., the adoption of an Affordable Housing Overlay) and assessed as part of the 5' Cycle Progress, or included as a Program in this Housing Plan. B. Analysis of Available Federal, State, and Local Data and Local Knowledge This section presents an overview of available federal, state, and local data to analyze fair housing issues in Temecula as included in the City's CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-143 2017 Assessment; these findings are supplemented with present day resources and local knowledge of existing conditions in the community to present a more realistic picture of fair housing concerns in Temecula and a more informed perspective from which to base goals, policies and programs to affirmatively further fair housing. Integration and Segregation Patterns and Trends According to the HUD provided Map 1-Race and Ethnicity, Temecula had no areas of concentrations of racial or ethnic groups. All ethnic groups are spread evenly throughout the City. The City also had no HUD -defined racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAP areas). Local knowledge confirmed this observation. Map 2 shows no appreciable difference from 1990. This is also confirmed with Table 3-Racial and Ethnicity Dissimilarity Trends. According to HUD, if a jurisdiction has an Index value of less than 40, there is high diversity (low segregation) in the City. The City has a score between 18.93 and 26.05 for the various racial and ethnic groups. Likewise, Map 3-National Origin shows no segregation pattern based on national origin. The top five population groups are spread evenly throughout the City, showing the City's diversity and high integration. In comparing the City with the region from Table 2-Demographic Trends, the percentage of Blacks and Hispanics is about half that in the region. There are more Whites and Asians in Temecula than the regional average. Twenty-two percent of the City's Hispanics were born in Mexico compared to 27% for the region based on calculation of figures in Table 1. Eighty-nine percent of the Hispanic immigrants are Limited English Proficiency (LEP). This is roughly the same as for the region. n%\31W There was a significant increase in the percentage of foreign born over the past twenty years, but the percentage of Limited English Proficiency (LEP) persons remained about the same, even though their population increased. Although only 3% of the population, 40% of Filipinos are LEPs, compared to 27% region -wide. According to Map 4-Persons with LEP, their populations are spread evenly across the City. According to Table 1, the largest disabled population are those who are ambulatory (3.831/o), followed by those with cognitive difficulty (3.54%), independent living difficulty (2.90%) and those with hearing loss (2.67%). There is probably considerable overlap in these populations. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-144 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT According to Table 1, eight percent of the City's population is seniors compared to 10.4% region -wide. Fifty-six percent of the households are families with children compared to 51 % region -wide. While all age groups increased in population, there was a slight decrease in the percentage of children and an increase in those of middle age. That could further be seen in a decrease in the proportion of families with children, even though it remains higher than the regional percentages. According to Table 2-Demographic Trends, racial and ethnic diversity has increased dramatically in the City over the past twenty years. Except Native Americans, the population of all racial and ethnic groups has grown; however, the Hispanic and Asian populations have increased at a much faster rate than the other population groups. Hispanics have increased from 14.5% to 25% of the population and Asians / Pacific Islanders from 2.40% to 9.71%. Despite an increase in population of over 28,000 in twenty years, the proportion of Whites has decreased from 80.23% in 1990 to 57% in 2010. Blacks have increased at a less dramatic rate from 1.3% to 4% from 1990 to 2010, but showed a slight decline percentagewise from 4.16% in 2000 to 3.88% in 2010, even though their population increased. While Native Americans constitute only .6% of the population, they were the only ethnic group to show a decrease in population between 2000 and 2010. Through the tremendous growth in populations, Table 3 demonstrates that the Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index range was still between 18.93 and 26.05, well below the HUD threshold of 40, meaning there is minimal segregation and high integration within the City. This compares to a range between 41.29 and 47.66 for the region. According to Maps 1 through 4 pertaining to racial and ethnic data and dissimilarity indexes, there are no patterns of segregation by race and ethnicity, national origin or LEP groups in the City. The majority of multi -family residential is located in areas with easy access to transit systems and employment centers throughout the City and not unduly constrained by perceived patterns of segregation. Based upon data in Table 2, the trend is that the City is becoming increasingly diverse as it has grown over the last twenty years. This is in line with trends throughout the region. Maps 1 and 2 do not reveal trends of segregation patterns forming within the City as a result of the growth. Information gathered from community meetings and surveys along with data sources provided stakeholders did not provide any information that segregation exists in the City affecting other protected characteristics was provided through stakeholder consultations. Workshop participants also concluded that the City is highly diverse. The region does have higher scores than the City, indicating a very diverse and integrated population, but as mentioned in the introduction, the region represents the largest MSA in the nation. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-145 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP) To assist communities in identifying racially/ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (RECAPS), HUD has developed a census tract -based definition of RECAPs. The definition involves a racial/ethnic concentration threshold and a poverty test. The racial/ethnic concentration threshold is straightforward: RECAPs must have a non- white population of 50 percent or more. Regarding the poverty threshold, Wilson (1980) defines neighborhoods of extreme poverty as census tracts with 40 percent or more of individuals living at or below the poverty line. Because overall poverty levels are substantially lower in many parts of the country, HUD supplements this with an alternate criterion. Thus, a neighborhood can be a RECAP if it has a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan/micropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower. HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within the City. Disparities in Access to Opportunity The UC Davis Center for Regional Change and Rabobank, N.A. partnered to develop the Regional Opportunity Index (ROI) intended to help understand social and economic opportunity in California's communities. The goal of the ROI is to help target resources and policies toward people and places with the greatest need to foster thriving communities. The ROI integrates a variety of data topics, including education, economic development, housing, mobility, health/environment, and civic life, and "maps" areas of potential investment by identifying specific areas of urgent need and opportunity. The ROI relies on many of the same data sources analyzed in the Housing Element, including the American Community Survey (ACS), the Longitudinal Employer -Household Dynamics (LEHD) Origin -Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) data, the California Department of Education, the California Department of Public Health, among others (data points are from 2014). There are two ROI "maps"; the "people" ROI illustrates the relative measure of the people's assets in education, the economy, housing, mobility/transportation, health/environment, and civic life) while the "place" ROI illustrates the relative measure of a place's assets in those same categories. The tool analyzes different specific indicators for each of the six data topics, as summarized in Table 65 on the following page. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-146 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Table 65: Overview of ROI Data Point Indicators People -Based Data Points Place -Based Data Points Education Elementary School Truancy High School Discipline rate • English Proficiency Teacher Experience • Math Proficiency UC/CSU Eligible • College Educated Adults High School Graduation Rate Economic Development Minimum Basic Income Bank Accessibility • Employment Rate Job Quality • Job Growth • Job Availability Housing Housing Cost Burden Housing Affordability • Homeownership Housing Adequacy Mobility Internet Access N/A • Commute Time • Vehicle Availability Health/Environment Years of Life Lost Air Quality • Births to Teens Health Care Availability • Infant Health Access to Supermarket • Prenatal Care CIVIC Life English Speakers Neighborhood Stability • Voting Rates US Citizenship As shown in Figures 3 and 4 on the following pages, Temecula has a range of opportunity levels throughout the community with slight differences between the relative measure of people -based assets versus placed -based assets, with place -based opportunities scoring slightly better than people -based opportunities. In general, most census tracts are shown to have average (yellow) to high (green) levels of opportunity, which indicates positive access to opportunities across the six data topics. However, in terms of people's assets, there are three census tracts which indicate lower levels of opportunity (shown in orange), and in terms of the place's assets, there is one census tract (which also includes areas outside of the City boundary) which indicates a lower level of opportunity (shown in orange). The higher and lower levels of opportunity for these three census tracts, by indicator, are summarized in Table 66 following the maps. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-147 Regional Opportunity Index: People, 2014 Description The R egionsI Oppnrt—ty Ind- (ROI): P-ple- relat" measure of —s in education, people's me a —.1. n—mg.—birtynransportan"". healthl—ir--t, and civic life. �= Regional Regional Opportunity Index: People- ❑ Some data not available - Lowest Opponunity ❑ L El Highest Opportunity m UCDAVIS U 2 4 S CENTER Miz REGIONAL CHANGE Figure 3: Regional Opportunity Index, People, 2014, Temecula J� J CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-148 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Regional Opportunity Index: Place, 2014 Description The R e ,—I Opp ert—ty Index (ROI): Place is a ie lathe measure of an area's asset In education, me a on"my. n—iZ—birtyn'anspodki . ,-Ithlenviro —t, and civic life. i•nr r.ge"d Regional Opportunity Index: Place ❑ Some data not available Lowest Opponunity ❑ _ Highest Opportunity m yc DAVIS U 2 4 S WPs'f;'" CENTER Miz REGIONAL CHANGE Figure 4: Regional Opportunity Index, Place, 2014, Temecula CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-149 Table 66: People -Based Regional Opportunity Index (ROI) Low and Lowest Opportunity Census Tracts, Temecula Census Tract Opportunity Average or Higher Lower Opportunities Level Opportunities 06065043216 Low Health/Environment Civic Life Opportunity Mobility/Transportation Housing • Economy • Education 06065043266 Low Health/Environment Civic Life Opportunity Mobility/Transportation Housing • Economy • Education 06065043220 Low Health/Environment Civic Life Opportunity Mobility/Transportation Housing • Economy • Education Source: UC Davis Center for Regional Change, 2021 (using 2014 data points) Table 67: Place -Based Regional Opportunity Index (ROI) Low Opportunity Census Tract, Temecula Census Tract Opportunity Average or Higher Lower Opportunities (Place) Level Opportunities 06065043254 Low Civic Life Health/Environment Opportunity Housing • Economy • Education 06065043252 west Civic Life Health/Environment Ortunity Housing • Education Economy Source: UC Davis Center for Regional Change, 2020 (using 2014 data points) The results of this analysis indicate that for those census tracts with lower -levels of people -based opportunities, the most significant issues revolve around civic life (lower levels of English speakers and voting rates), housing (lower levels of homeownership and higher cost burdens), the economy (households making the minimum basic income and low employment rates), and education (math proficiency). When considering place -based opportunities, which the City arguably has more control over, the City of Temecula fares very well, and only one census tract has a low level of place -based opportunity as described above. For both census tracts with lower levels of opportunity (which are both located along the City's boundary) there appears to be limited access to supermarkets, and, to a lesser extent, health care. 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Map Additionally, the Department of Housing and Community Development together with the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee established the California Fair Housing Task Force to CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-150 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT provide research, evidence -based policy recommendations, and other strategic recommendations to HCD and other related state agencies/departments to further the fair housing goals (as defined by HCD). The Task force developed the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Maps to understand how public and private resources are spatially distributed. The Task force defines opportunities as pathways to better lives, including health, education, and employment. Overall, opportunity maps are intended to display which areas, according to research, offer low income children and adults the best chance at economic advancement, high educational attainment, and good physical and mental health. According to the Task Force's methodology, the tool allocates the 20 percent of the tracts in each region with the highest relative index scores to the "Highest Resource" designation and the next 20 percent to the "High Resource" designation. Each region then ends up with 40 percent of its total tracts as "Highest" or "High" resource. These two categories are intended to help State decision -makers identify tracts within each region that the research suggests low income families are most likely to thrive, and where they typically do not have the option to live —but might, if given the choice. The remaining tracts are then evenly divided into "Low Resources" and "Moderate Resource". As shown in Figure 5, the majority of Temecula is classified as the "high" or "highest" resource designation, one census tract (east of I-15 and Old Town) is identified as "moderate". Other Access to Opportunity Indicators As part of its 2017 Assessment, the City also evaluated any disparities in access to proficient schools based on race/ethnicity, national origin, and family status. The City does not have jurisdiction over the local schools. They are administered by independent public school districts, such as the Temecula Valley Unified School District. Table 12 - Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity provides an index regarding how well fourth graders of the various racial and ethnic groups are doing on their State exams in comparison with national indices. Higher scores indicate higher proficiencies in the schools. According to Table 12, the school proficiency index is essentially the same for all races and ethnic groups in the City. On a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being the highest, Hispanics scored 79.00, Blacks at 80.36, Native Americans at 80.86, Asians at 81.58 and Whites at 82.20. In comparison, the region scored between 40.97 for Hispanics on the low end and 58.09 for Whites on the high end. The City has one Title 1 school (Temecula Elementary School) in the northern end of the City. A school is a Title 1 School if at least 40% of CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-151 the children participate in a free or reduced lunch program. The school is located in one of the City's CDBG eligible areas. There are no Title 1 Middle Schools or High Schools in the City. The school district has a policy that parents can transfer their children from school to school subject to availability. Parents would responsible for providing transportation to the new school. Public transportation is available, although it may be limited based on the location of the school from their place of residence. The City also previously evaluated any disparities in access to jobs and labor markets by protected class groups. The Jobs Proximity Index in Table 12-Opportunity Indicators provides an index for the physical distances between place of residence and jobs by race/ethnicity. The Labor Market Index also in Table 12 provides a measure of unemployment rate, labor -force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor's degree, by neighborhood. The higher scores represent greater the access to employment opportunities, and are better prepared to enter the labor market with higher incomes. According to the Map 10 series for Job Proximities, persons in the lower -income areas live substantially closer to employment opportunities than their counterparts in the higher -income areas, often located farther away from the Interstate. Again, there was little difference between racial and ethnic groups or national origin according to Map 10 and Table 12 for Job Proximity. The Labor Market Index for the various races and ethnicities range from 46.38 for Native Americans to 49.79 for Whites. These scores, which are based on a scale from 1 to 100, would be in the average range based on HUD's perspective nationwide. There was no difference between the City as a whole and those below the poverty line. In fact, all races except Asians who were below the poverty line had slightly higher scores than those above the poverty level. They ranged between 44.15 for Asians and 51.31 for Blacks with Whites at 48.79. When compared with the region, the City residents scored much higher. The region ranged from 24.20 for Hispanics to 43.02 for Asians and unlike the City, there was a substantial difference for those below the poverty line. They ranged from 16.42 for Hispanics to 30.51 for Asians. Whites were at 25.55. Although some classes are available locally, the lack of a community college in Temecula in 2010 is probably part of the reason for this deficiency. However, since 2010, several campuses have opened in Temecula, including Cal State San Marcos at Temecula, University of Redlands, Concordia University, and Mount San Jacinto. More recent data would CITY OF TEMECULA GLNERAL PLAN HBK-152 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT likely show an improvement in job readiness of the labor market. Other areas in the region have notably higher ratings such as in the vicinity of UC Riverside, Cal State San Bernardino and Redlands College in the north and in Orange County to the west. The Low Poverty Index rates family poverty by household (based on the federal poverty line) provides an index regarding the access to poverty by census tract. The higher the scores, the less likely a neighborhood is exposed to poverty. There was little difference between the various ethnic and racial groups. Indices ranged from 65.42 for Hispanics to 71.23 for Whites, which indicates that all racial and ethnic groups have low exposure to poverty in Temecula. Except for Asians, there was little difference between those below the poverty line. They ranged for 54.98 for Blacks to 67.95 for Native Americans. The only anomaly was for Asians at 46.21 who were more exposed to poverty than their counterparts. This could be reflective of recent Filipino immigrants which now constitute over 3% of the City's population and 40% are limited English speaking according to Table 1. Though a small minority group, there are a number living in a low income area. Again, there was a substantial difference between the City residents and those within the region. In the region, the range was between 37.51 for Hispanics to 60.42 for Asians. For those below the poverty line, there was even a larger difference. They ranged from 23.78 for Hispanics to 42.30 for Asians. City residents have less exposure to poverty than the region as a whole. According to Map 14-Demographics and Poverty, there were three adjoining census tracts in north Temecula that had low scores indicating a higher exposure to poverty. Three of the census tracts are CDBG eligible lower -income areas, but one of the adjoining areas is not, yet affected by its exposure to poverty. Another adjoining area is an eligible CDBG area but did not indicate a high exposure to poverty. The area has a number of market -rate and subsidized apartment complexes in the vicinity of the Temecula Elementary School, which may be affecting this index score. The corridor also contains many of ^ the City's commercial shopping centers. Summary of Access to Opportunity The vast majority of Temecula residents enjoy a consistent level of access to opportunities. Analysis of the HUD -provided maps and data did not reveal any overarching patterns of poor access to opportunity and did not reveal adverse community factors. However, Census Tract 432.16 along the Margarita Corridor, is identified on Map 14 as having high exposure to poverty. Two of the three block groups are in CDBG-eligible areas and the third is not. Yet the HUD data indicates that the third block group CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-153 also has a high exposure to poverty. The only Title 1 School in the district is located in this neighborhood. The area is characterized by commercial retail and uses and the presences of a mix of multifamily and single family housing. Two of the multi -family complexes in one of the block groups are subsidized, the 40-unit Oak Tree Apartments on Lyndie Lane and the 55 unit Rancho California Apartments off of Margarita Road. There are a number of subsidized units west of Interstate 15, which is a CDBG eligible area, but that area does not have a high exposure factor. This could be partly because the City has focused its CDBG and local funds in addressing this area. The City does not show any patterns of segregation, nor does it have any R/ECAPS. Consultations with residents and stakeholders confirmed the HUD - provided information regarding the lack of disparities in access to opportunity in Temecula affecting groups with other protected characteristics. The City is involved in a number of efforts aimed at improving air quality of the entire region including the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Clean Cities Coalition, which aims to reduce the consumption of petroleum fuels. The City also participates in WRCOG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The TUMF program makes improvements to the regional transportation system and provides transportation demand management through funds from new development. C. Disproportionate Housing Need The analysis of disproportionate housing needs within Temecula evaluated existing housing need, need of the future housing population, and units within the community at -risk of converting to market -rate (which are limited). Future Growth Need The City's future growth need is based on the RHNA production of 1,356 very -low and 801 low income units within the 2021-2029 planning period. As discussed throughout this Background Report, both existing and proposed affordable units are well dispersed throughout the community and do not present a geographic barrier to obtaining affordable housing. Appendix A of this Housing Element shows the City's ability to meet its 2021-2029 RHNA need at all income levels. This demonstrates the City's ability to accommodate the anticipated future affordable housing needs of the community. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-154 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Existing Need As described earlier in this Background Report, the City has a strong history of providing housing for lower -income households in Temecula. Temecula has 759 deed -restricted units, representing approximately 2% of the City's housing stock. The City is proud of meeting the needs of its existing residents but continues to identify and implement meaningful housing programs to expand opportunities for lower -income households throughout Temecula, including by continuing to implement its recently adopted Affordable Housing Overlay and Specific Plans, many of which allow for develop of housing projects at densities of at least 30 du/ac. HUD requires all grantees to compare and assess the burdens for housing for different groups in the community. A disproportionately greater burden exists when the members of a particular group experience a housing problem at a greater rate (90 percent or more) than the group as a whole. Table 10-Demographics of Household with Severe Housing Cost Burden demonstrates the number and percentage of persons by race/ethnicity and family size experiencing severe housing cost burden. There is no substantial difference between racial and ethnic groups. Non -family households demonstrated the highest cost burdens. The City scores are reflective of the region. According to Table 9, half of the City's households are experiencing one of the four housing problems identified above. There is a disparity in this category with 47.37% of the White households experiencing a housing problem, Asians at 54.31% and Blacks at 55.04%. Hispanics are higher at 62.24% and Native Americans at 80.90%. For severe housing problems, they range from 20.76% for White households to 35.56% for Hispanic households. Native Americans were at 33.71%. Map 5 - Publicly Supported Housing and Map 6 - Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) provides the location of the limited number of publicly supported and HVC housing units in the City. Given the housing costs in the City and the region, there is a high demand for affordable rental housing. While comparable with the region, all households, except Black households, were slightly more burdened in the City than in the region. For those below the poverty level, all groups, except for Native Americans, were less burdened in the City than in the region. Based on our examination of the data in Table 9 and demonstrated in Map 7- Housing Cost Burden and Race/Ethnicity, there were no disproportionate housing problems based on race, ethnicity, national origin, household type and size. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-155 These results are not unexpected with the high costs of housing in Southern California as a whole. Based on the data in the Table 11, there are a limited number of Project Based Section 8 units for families in the City. There are 54 two- and three -bedroom units and only 36 units are households with children. There are also a limited number of Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCV) units where there are 30 two- and three -bedroom units and only thirteen units are households with children. Additional affordable housing units for families continue to be a high demand in the City. Through its 2017 Assessment, the City identified the availability of affordable units in a range of sizes as a contributing factor of disproportionate housing needs. D. Displacement Risk As previously discussed, there are two deed -restricted affordable projects representing 180 units which can be considered as high risk as converting to market -rate units within the planning period. The City is actively engaged with the property owners of these projects (Rancho Creek Apartments and Rancho West Apartments) to evaluate preservation options. The City also has a number of units which are affordable to lower -income families but are not deed -restricted. As described in Section V of this Background Report, the City plans to accommodate the vast majority of its 2021-2029 RHNA on vacant parcels already zoned for residential development, with a focus on new development in the City's Specific Plan areas (Harveston, Altair, Uptown, and Old Town), which have good access to transit, amenities, and programmed infrastructure improvements. Given that new development is expected to occur on vacant parcels, there is not a IN significant displacement risk associated with the City's current affordable housing stock. The City has included Program 17 in the Housing Plan to assist in the preservation of at -risk housing units. The City recognizes that even though it has identified sufficient vacant land to accommodate its RHNA at all income levels, there is still the potential for economic displacement because of new development and investment. This "knock -on" effect can occur at any time, and it can be challenging for the City to predict market changes and development patterns which have the potential to impact rental rates and sales prices for housing units available in the marketplace. To date, the City has no evidence that new development (affordable or market -rate) has resulted in economic displacement. However, the City appreciates the possibility that economic displacement might occur in the future and has developed Program 24 to study and address potential issues related to displacement. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-156 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT The City has also considered the risk of displacement specifically for protected classes, including persons with disabilities, female -headed households, seniors, and nonwhite residents (as discussed previously throughout Section 3 of this Background Report). The highest levels of persons with disabilities, seniors, and female -headed households are not located in areas where no residential development is planned, and the risk of displacement to these groups (like to the City's lower -income residents) is low. However, some future housing sites are located in areas with high levels of Hispanic and nonwhite residents, and these groups appear to be more vulnerable to potential future displacement. As discussed above, Program 24 has been included in the City's Housing Plan to study and address issues related to future displacement, and the City remains committed to maintaining its existing affordable housing stock, which includes deed -restricted affordable units throughout the City, including in the census tracts with high levels of Hispanic and nonwhite residents. To the extent that future development occurs in areas where there is existing housing, all housing must be replaced according to SB 330's replacement housing provisions (Government Code Section 66300). SB 330 also provides relocation payments to existing low income tenants. The State has also adopted just cause eviction provisions and statewide rent control to protect tenants from displacement. The City is committed to making diligent efforts to engage underrepresented and disadvantaged communities in studying displacement. Programs 22 and 24, among others, detail efforts the City will take to engage these communities during the planning period. E. Assessment of Contributing Factors to Fair Housing Issues in Temecula In its 2017 Assessment of Fair Housing, the City identified the following contributing factors to fair housing issues in Temecula: • Increased demand of affordable housing with supportive services to serve special needs populations (Disproportionate Housing Needs) • High demand for affordable housing, due to the high housing costs in the community and the region (Publicly Supported Housing Location and Occupancy) • Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations (Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources) CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-157 The analysis above regarding other fair housing issues within Temecula yielded the following results: • The City does not have any racial or ethnic groups that score higher than 60 on the dissimilarity index, indicating that while there are racial and ethnic groups with higher levels of segregation than others within Temecula, none meet the standard set to identify segregated groups. • The City does not have any racially or ethnically concentrated census tracts (RECAPs) as identified by HUD. This indicates that there are no census tracts within Temecula with a non- white population of 50 percent or more or any census tracts that have a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan/micropolitan area. • The UC Davis Regional Opportunity Index shows that the majority of residents within Temecula have average- to high - levels of access to opportunity throughout the majority of the City, with three census tracts showing lower people -based access to opportunity and two census tracts showing lower place -based access to opportunity. Based on the data used to identify opportunity access, the City has varying degrees of ability to influence the trajectory of the indicator (for example, low rates of US citizenship result in a lower opportunity assessment for place -based civic life). The City accommodates a significant portion of its RHNA in areas planned for a mix of uses located in proximity to each other, where new residential development can be supported by easy access to goods and services (like supermarkets and financial institutions), and the introduction of new residential development into areas where these challenges exist can expand opportunities for existing residents. • Analysis of the TCAC/HCD opportunity Area Maps show that most census tracts in Temecula are classified with either the "High Resource", or "Highest Resource" designation, and the remaining one tract is classified as "Moderate Resource". This indicates that the most census tracts designated as "High Resource" or "Highest Resource" are within the top forty percent in the region in terms of areas that lower -income residents may thrive if given the opportunity to live there. • The City has demonstrated the ability to meet the anticipated future affordable housing needs of the community through the designation of sites to meet the very -low and low income CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-158 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT RHNA need (Section 5 of the Background Report) and Programs 1 and 2 address the City's ability to meet the 6th Cycle RHNA allocation and outline the mechanism to ensure continued compliance for the duration of the planning period. Existing deed -restricted affordable units are located throughout the community and new accessory dwelling unit production throughout the City will result in new development affordable to a variety of income levels. The City plans to accommodate its very low and low income RHNA need in key planned growth areas located near transit facilities and adjacent to major infrastructure projects, to ensure adequate access to goods, facilities and jobs, while jobs and housing to be located closer together, thereby reducing vehicle miles travels, improve air quality, and create a more equitable jobs -housing balance. The relationship between existing affordable units and comprehensively planned growth on vacant parcels in and outside of Specific Plan areas allows the City to minimize displacement and improve access to opportunities for existing and future residents. • There are 180 existing affordable units at -risk of converting to market -rate within the planning period. Program 17 addresses monitoring and working with partners, as feasible, to preserve at -risk units within the City over the planning period. F. Analysis of Sites Pursuant to AB 686 AB 686 requires that jurisdictions identify sites throughout the community in a manner that is consistent with its duty to affirmatively further fair housing. The site identification requirement involves not only an analysis of site capacity to accommodate the RHNA (provided in Section 5), but also whether the identified sites serve the purpose of replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas w of poverty into areas of opportunity. Segregation/Integration Both existing affordable units and proposed very -low and low income RHNA candidate sites are well dispersed throughout the city and do not disproportionately impact areas with larger concentrations of the Hispanic population, although as described previously, the City has no historic patters of segregation or isolation and there are no trends to indicate that a pattern may emerge in the future. The City of Temecula is proud to have adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay to promote the development of affordable housing options throughout the community. In addition, the City is proactively taking CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-159 steps to plan for, promote, and streamline development of accessory dwelling units as part of the solution to the City's housing needs. Together, the City's plan to accommodate its lower income RHNA at AHO sites and through ADUs will further strengthen the City's reputation as being a well -integrated community without patterns of isolation or segregation. R/ECAPs The City does not have any racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty and the identification of sites to accommodate the City's RHNA is not expected to alter this finding. Access to Opportunity No sites identified to accommodate the City's lower income RHNA are located in areas with low levels of place -based opportunity and only a limited number of sites, all within the City's Affordable Housing Overlay, are located in areas with lower levels of people -based opportunity. The concerns in these limited areas include high housing cost burdens, low levels of homeownership, and low voting rates. The introduction of new affordable housing options in this area, facilitated through the City's new Affordable Housing Overlay, will help to create more housing affordable to households at lower -income levels, introduce new residents to an area which can contribute to higher levels of civic engagement, and expand opportunities for people to live and work in the same area. Additionally, the Specific Plan areas identified to accommodate a portion of the City's lower income RHNA (specifically Harveston, Altair, Uptown, and Old Town) are located in areas with relatively high opportunity and resources. By located new affordable housing in these areas, the City continues to promote an integration of economic backgrounds and household incomes and ensure that all Temecula residents have access to high levels of opportunity, regardless of income or other characteristics. Displacement Risk The City plans to accommodate its RHNA for all income levels at vacant sites throughout the City. Past residential development projects have not caused displacement to existing Temecula residents, and there is no expectation that the City's program to accommodate its RHNA at vacant sites throughout the City would create displacement risk for current or future lower income residents. However, in an abundance of caution, the City ahs included Program 24 to study the risk if displacement to residents as a result of new residential development at vacant sites in and outside of Specific Plan areas. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-160 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT Site Analysis Findings The City of Temecula has a history of developing affordable housing projects throughout the community, at vacant and infill sites. To accommodate the City's RHNA, the City has undertake a robust inventory of available vacant residential sites inside and outside of Specific Plan areas, many of which are identified as part of the City's Affordable Housing Overlay. While the City's very -low and low RHNA needs are largely accommodated in its Specific Plan areas, which do not represent extremely concentrated racial or ethnic populations, the City has included programs to encourage additional development of lower - income units throughout the community through its accessory dwelling unit program and through its Affordable Housing Overlay. For these reasons, the City finds that the sites proposed to accommodate its RHNA need do not unduly burden existing areas of concentrated racial or ethnic homogeneity, poverty, or other characteristics. Moreover, the sites contribute to affirmatively further fair housing by helping to stimulate investing in areas where additional people- and place -based opportunity is desired, and where new residential and/or mixed -use development can help to improve some of the opportunity level characteristics discussed earlier in this section. G. Analysis of Contributing Factors and Fair Housing Priorities and Goals The December 2015 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule Guidebook identifies examples of contributing factors by each fair housing issue area: outreach, fair housing enforcement and outreach capacity, segregation and integration, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disparities in access to opportunities for persons with disabilities, disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risks, and sites inventory. Based on the analysis included in this Background Report, the City has identified the following potential contributing factors to fair housing issues in Temecula and, as described later in this section, has developed a series of specific programs to address these contributing factors. 1. Increased demand of affordable housing with supportive services to serve special needs populations. The City of Temecula is home to residents with special needs who need additional opportunities for safe and affordable housing. This includes persons with developmental disabilities. Program 9, Special Needs Housing Construction, has been included in the City's Housing Plan to address this contributing factor. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-161 2. High demand for affordable housing, due to the high housing costs in the community and the region. Temecula is located in an area easily accessible to San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, and Los Angeles counties. Due to its proximity to a variety of jobs centers, Temecula is a desirable and relatively affordable place to reside, and this pressure has increased demand for affordable housing options within the City. The City has included numerous programs in its Housing Plan to increase the supply of affordable housing, including Programs 1 and 2 to ensure that the City provides sufficient capacity to accommodate its RHNA at all income levels for the duration of the planning period, Program 4 which addresses the replacement of affordable units, and Program 5 which promotes ADUs as an option to expand the City's affordable housing stock. 3. Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations. Like agencies throughout the region, Temecula has limited resources available to implement a variety of fair housing plans and programs. Other agencies with which the City regularly partners, including the Riverside County Consortium and Fair Housing Program of Riverside County, also face limited resources. The City has included Program 22, Equal Housing Opportunity, to do its part in promoting fair housing agencies and organizations and working with partner agencies to affirmatively further fair housing in Temecula. To affirmatively further fair housing in Temecula, the City is committed to implementing its Affordable Housing Overlay, promoting affordable accessory dwelling units, and providing sites suitable for affordable housing in areas near transit, which are not unduly racially or ethnically concentrated, and where new residential development affordable to very -low and low income households can help to expand people- and place -based opportunities. The City of Temecula has a long history of supporting affordable housing development and as described previously in this Background Report. Moving forward, the City remains committed to providing a diversity of housing options for all income levels, and is committed to encouraging their development throughout the community to help overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. The vast majority of the City's Housing Programs designed to address fair housing are required to be implemented on an ongoing basis, with annual progress reports and programs evaluations to ensure they are achieving the City's objectives. The following list summarizes those programs identified in this Housing Element which affirmatively further fair housing and implement the City's 2017 Fair Housing Assessment: CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HBK-162 CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT • Program 5, to promote ADUs including ADUs affordable to lower -income households • Program 6, to ensure that the City's density bonus ordinance continues to be in compliance with state law • Program 7, to promote land assemblage and affordable housing development • Program 8, to address the special needs of the City's extremely low income households • Program 13, to expedite processing of affordable housing projects • Program 16, to accommodate specialized housing types and update the City's policies and procedures regarding low barrier navigation centers, supportive housing, employee housing, and farmworker housing • Program 17, to monitor and preserve at -risk housing • Program 22, to promote equal housing opportunities • Program 23, to continue offering housing referral services • Program 24, to study and address economic displacement risks To the extent that these programs represent ongoing work efforts, these programs are evaluated for effectiveness within Section 2 of this Background Report. The City has already undertaken a series of proactive amendments to its Zoning Ordinance to address new requirements related to density bonus law and accessory dwelling units, and the City will continue to partner with local and regional stakeholders to affirmatively further fair housing in Temecula. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HBK-163 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A: SITE INVENTORY d ECULA CI E N IER-AL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE APN OWNER GPLU GPDESCRIPT ZONING_Cur ZONEDESC_C Acres_O71121 AHO Density EL VL L M AM Total 9fi464000fi RORIPAUGHVALLEYRESTORATION L Low Residential (0.5-2Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 12.8862fi0453J4 2.00000000000 21.90fi60 21.906fi0 96464000E RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION L Low Residential (0.5-2Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 14.3958220369E 2.0000ORROM 0 24.4J29 24.4121 96464001E RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION M Medium Resitlen[ial (]-12 Ou/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 11.681916310J2 MOD wo00000 99.29629 99.29629 964640010 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION M Medium Residential (J-12 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-11) 11.81111491325 10.00000000000 100.3945 100.3945 96464000J RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION L Low Residemial(0.5-2Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 1J.38005171JJ2 5.00000000000 73.86524 731 524 96464001E RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION M Medlum Resldential(7-12 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-11) 12.55011155163 10.00000000000 306.6J59 106.6)59 964640012 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION L Low Residential(0.5-2Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-11) 20.02586N4729 LOp000omom 34.04396 34.04396 96464000E 91027100E RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION YNEZ ACRES M SC Medium Residential(J-12 Du/ACMax) Service Commercial SP-11 SC SPECIFIC PUN(SP-11) SERVICE COMMERCIAL (SC) 19.169)4914001 1.68521454]09 10.000000mom 20m 00000000 1fi2.9429 162.9429 25.27822 25.2]822 11021Z.14 HOFF INV SC Service Commercial SP-14 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-14) 1.7435549991E Ves 30.00000000000 4.446065 4.446065 8.89213 13,3382 13.3382 44.46065 9093]0050 9102]100) CITY OFTEMECUOU YNEZ ACRES PI SC Public lns[i[ufional Facilities Service Commercial PDO-10 SC PLANNED ON OVERLAY SERVICECOMMERCIAL(SC) 10.8398615531]Yes 2.)4]3932fi205 30.000000MOM 20.000000WON 60,97422 73.16907 1093531 243.8969 41.20)9 41.2079 91027201E 910272023 HOFF INV FOUNDATIONFORACOURSEINMIRACIESINC SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-14 SP-14 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-14) SPECIFIC LA 1.4325256005fi Ves 1.118045221 C 30.00000000000 30.D0000000000 3.65294 3.15294 J.30588110.112 11.11112 31.1214 2.876515 2.876515 5.]53031 B.EZ1146 8.629546 28.76515 91027202E 9102]1005 HOFF INV YNEZ ACRES SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-14 SC SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-14) SERVICECOMMERCIAL(SC) 1.02257251888 Yes 1.97981840115 30.00000000000 20.00ODOOO0000 26075E 26075E 5.21512 7.8226E 7.8226E 26.075E 29.6972E 29.6972: 91037201) 110212022 HOFF INV FOUNDATIONFORACOURSEINMIRACIESINC SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-14 SP-14 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-14) SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-14) 1.2033705223fi Ves 1.03611809]41 30A0000000000 30.000DOOD0000 3.068595 3.068595 6.13719 9.205]84 9.205784 3018595 2.642101 2.642101 5.284202 ).926303 7.926303 26.42101 909370049 910262003 CITY OF TEMECUTA A FFINV PI SC Public lns[i[ufional Facilities Service Commercial POO-10 SP-14 PLANNED ON OVERLAY IPDO-10) SPE[IFICPLAN(SP-14 19.1415]090441 Yes 1.3692958140E Yes 30.00000000000 30m D0000000 107.6713 129.2056 193.8084 430,6853 3A91]04 3.491J04 6.98340E 1D.47511 10.457SU 34.917. 91026200E 9102J2001 HOFFINV HOFFINV SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-14 SP-14 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-14) SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-14) 1.6411291954C Ves 1.E)9083163. Yes 30A000o0O0000 30.00000000000 4.1848J9 4.184879 8.36975E 12.55464 12.55460 41.8487E 4.281662 4.281662 8.563324 12.8449E 12.8449E 42.81662 9102]2021 910262010 A FFINV HOFFINV SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-14 SP-14 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-14) SPECIFIC PUN(SP-14) 1.53584219699 Yes 1.53091893299 Yes 30.D0000000000 30.00ODOOo0O00 3,916398 3.916398 7.832)95 11.74919 11,74919 39.16398 3.903843 3.903843 7.907687 11.171153 11.71153 39.03843 91027100fi 910172002 YNEZ ACRES HUFF INV SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SC SP-14 SERVICE COMMERCIAL (SC) SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-14) 2.4)54500905fi 1.]3662844051 20.00000000000 30.00000000000 37.131)5 3).13175 4,428913 4,428913 8.857821 13.186)4 13.286]4 49.28913 1102720IS 91fi400042 HOFF INV HARVESTONSAB SC SC Service COmmercial Service Commercial SP-14 SP-13 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-14) SPECIFICPLAN (SP-13) 1.34335204554 1D.1072920]OB] 30.000000OOOM Vanes 3,425548 3.42554E 6.851095 10.2]614 10.2J664 34.2554E 10.E4525 10.84525 21.6905 32.53574 32.535)4 108.4525 91640003E 916400063 HARVESTON SAB HARVEST IN SAB SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial Sp SP-13 SPECIFIC PUN(SP-13) LA SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-13) 5.96524900225 1.1951554121E Vanes Vanes 6.338077 6.338077 12.67615 19.01423 19.01423 63.380J7 1.269853 1.269853 2.539705 3.809558 3.80955E 12.698IS 916400064 9164000GE HARVESTONSAB HARVESTONSAB SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-13 SP-13 SPECIFIC PUN(SP-13) SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-13) 4.315575282UC 6.)749410936] Vanes Vanes 4,585299 4.585299 9.170597 13.7559 13.7559 45.85299 ).19E3)5 7.199375 14.39675 21.59512 21.59512 71.98375 916400034 916400036 HA"ESTON SAB HARVEST IN SAB SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-13 SP-13 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-13) SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-13) 4.030)3961384 4.01958611575 Vanes Vanes 4.282661 4.282661 8.565322 U.-: 12.8479E 41.12161 4.27081 4.27081 8.54162 12.81243 12.81243 42.7081 9164Do ED 91fi400031 HARVESTONSAB HARVESTON SAB SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-13 SP-13 SPECIFIC PUN(SP-13) SPECIFIC PUN(SP-13) 10.26397292025 3.64828296981 Vanes Vanes 10.90547 10.90547 21.81094 32.71641 32,71641 109.0547 3.876301 3.E]6301 7.712601 11.6289 11.6289 39.7 301 916400053 9164DO 62 YNEZ ACRES HARVESTON SAB SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SC SP-13 SERVICECOMMERCIAL(SC) SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-13) 7.86975680691 4.1J44466413C 20.00000000000 Vanes 118.041 118.04fi0 4.43535 0.43535 8.8J0699 13.30605 13.30605 44.3535 916400067 9164D0044 HARVESTONSAB HA.ESTON SAB SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-13 SP-13 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-13) SPECIFICPLAN (SP-13) 3.4426273]131 0.6830389522E Vanes Vanes 3,117792 3.117792 ].3111% 11.97337 10,97337 36.5)792 O.J25]29 O.J25J29 1.45145E 2.177187 2.177187 7.25128E 916400065 919043003 HARVESTON SAB LEESHIO CHAD SC VL Service Commercial Very Low Resldentla1:0.1-0.4 Du/ACMax) Sp VL SPECIFIC PUN(SP-13) VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 0.51268]18J88 0.]532381643] Vanes 0.4 0.544]3 0.54473 1.08546 1.63419 1.6341E S-7301 0.2259]3 0.225971 919190003 STARBUCK LESTER M VL Very Low Residential(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 1.062450O475 0.4 0.318)350.318735 919291004 CAIRNS ROSSD VL III Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 0.60267050206 0.4 O.1B0801 0.180801 919062//2 AMAVAVALDEMAR VL Very Low Residential �0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 0.5981695908E OA 0.1]9451 0.179451 920110004 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE p0 Profession al Office PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) 0.99696981341 Ves 30.00000000000 5.607955 6.729546 10.09432 22.43182 921120014 FARIS EODIE VU Very Low Residential (O2-0.4 Ou/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 0.54829980141 0.4 OA6449 0.16449 919151.12 VERHOEF ELLENE VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 0.5E6)7896551 0.4 0.176034 0.176034 919392011 PU U DO CRAIG VL Very Low Residential(0.2-oA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 0.62994823]02 0.4 0.188984 0.188984 92102008E CITY OF TEM ECUOU SC Service Commercial SC SERVICE COMMERCIAL (SC) 3.E5103419998 20.00OOOOl10000 54.76551 54.76551 921330052 TERZIAN MARTIN PO Professional Office PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE APO) 1.1089995327: Yes 30.00000000000 6,238122 7.485747 11.22862 24.95249 921330053 TERZIAN MARTIN PO Professional Office PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE APO) 1.1954639J309 Yes 30.000000OOOOC 6.724485 8.069382 12.3040J 26.89791 91916100] PRICE IACQUELYN M VL Very Low Residential(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 0.ED282726589 0.4 0.24084E 0.24084E 919162001 HSIEHCHIHSIANG VL Very Low Residential l0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 0.5)869264163 0.4 0.17360E 0.17360E 919251002 CAUGHEY LAMES GREGORY VL Very Low Residential �0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 0.51652898606 0.4 0.15495E 0.15495E 921161002 KUEBLERIOSEPHJ VL Very Low Residential �0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 0.55365E M4335 0.4 0.16617 0.16617 921211001 ER,BRADLEY JOHN VL IN Low Residentia1(0.2-0A Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 0.53622409062 DA O.1fi0867 0.160867 121300013 SAEEU.AANGELAC cc Community Commercial Cc COMMUNITY COMM(CC) 20.08M N2211 20.00000000000 301.3315 301.3325 921060058 WEUUPROFIT INTERNATIONAL INC HT Highway Tourist Commercial SP-14 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-14) 3.506536330J2 Yes 30.00000000000 8,941668 8.941668 17.88334 26.825 26.825 89,41668 921280002 CARLOS&EMMAALVAREZ FAMILY LTD PARTNER PO Professional Office PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) 1.2166808224O Yes 30.00000000000 6.84383 8.212596 12.3188E 2).3)532 92214001C CITY OF TEMECULA VL Very Low Residential(0.2-OA Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 1.7370689270E 0.4 2.321121 2.321131 922180015 BOSSELERIOVCEL VL Very Low Reslden[Ial (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.268136516)1 0.9 0.680491 0.680941 92210004E CHANG ROGER SDI Specific Plan Implementation SP-5 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-5) 0.1165913,342 30 2490328 2.490328 4.980657 7.47985 7,470985 24.90328 92212001) SHEK DAVID IT HlghwaV 1UFI1 Commercial HT HIGHWAY/TOURIST COM M(HT) O.8685753270E 20.000000WON 13.02863 13.11 92212001E SHEK DAVID HT Highway Touris[Commercial HT HIGHWAY/TOURIST COMM�HT) 1.3117016fi821 20.00000000000 19.6J553 19.fi7553 922120019 SHEK DAVID HT HlghwaV Tourist Commercial HT HIGHWAY/TOURIST CoM (HT) 1.1)894707131 20.00000000000 17.68421 1J.68421 92210003E UHT PARTNERSHIP SC Service Commercial SC SERVICE COMMERCIAL (SC) 0.85543382207 20.00000000000 12.83151 12.83151 9221fi0024 BOONERAYA VL Very Low Residential �0.2-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 3.266230)5354 0.4 0.979863 0.9]9863 922190033 RI IMASOOD VL Very Low Residential �0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 2.53345181579 0.4 0.Jfi0036 0.76003fi 922190034 ROSTAI MASOOD VL Very Low 11 identiall0.2-0.4Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 2.55079399454 0.9 O.J652110.)65231 92220000E EMMI ELEANORF VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 4,58515811152 0.4 1,371547 1.3]5547 92219001E NAKAMURAYUTAKA VL Very Low Residential(0.2-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 2.53981800351 1.4 0.761945 0.761945 922190022 ROSTAI MASOOD VL Very Low Residential(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 2.84385090147 0.4 0.813155 0.8531IS 12221001] HU83 M Medlum Resid:ntl l(J-12 Du/ACMax) SP-15 SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-15) 1D.2333J39326C Vanes 12,61263 11.61163 25.22527 37.837E 37.837E 116.1263 922230026 UPPALRUPINDER M Medium Resitlen[ial (]-12 Du/ACMax) M MEDIUM DENSITY RES(M) 30.11030)66873 1200000000000 2]0.9928 270.9928 921202002 SOLDANO ROGER VL Very Low Residential(0.2-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 1.1301J224421 1.4 0.339OS2 0.339052 921211002 BRINEGAR BRADLEY JOHN VL Very Low Reside U.I(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VI.) 0.5356919310E 0.4 O.160J08 O.1fi07. '22U5304) UZ SPI Spe<Iflc Plan Implementation Sp-5 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) 1.7420899264] 30 4.442328 4.442328 8.884656 13.32698 13.32698 44.42328 922190031 NAKAMURAYUTAKA VL Very Low Residential(O2-o.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 2.645969J4045 0.4 0.7937911.791791 92211006g QQQQ SC Service Commercial Sc SERVICE COMMERCIAL (SC) 0.809503125R 20.00011101 12.14255 12.142" 922310042 CHAI KING HT Highway Tourist Commercial HT HIGHWAY/TOURIST COMM (HT) 1.87967230305 20AOOOOOOOo00 28.19508 28.1950E 916400043 HARVESTONSAB SC Service Commercial SP-13 SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-13) 4.49100103581 Vanes 4.771689 4.771681 9.5433J7 14.31507 14.3150) 41.7168E 916400051 916400052 HARVESTON SAB HARVESTON SAB SC SC Service Commercial Service Commercial SP-13 SP-13 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-13) SPECIFICPLAN (SP-13) :.37:0 796662 5.358075782OC Vanes Vanes 6.11452E 6.11452E 1222905 18.3435E 18.3435E 61.1452E 5.692956 5.69295: 11.38591 1].078E] 1J.07887 56.92956 91640005E 1. 20002 HARVESTON SAB CITY OFTEMECUOU SC SPI Service Commercial Specifc Plan implementation SP-13 SP-15 SPECIFIC PUN(SP-13) SPECIFIC PIAN(SP-15) 4.8105841944] 20.3429444364E Vanes 5.11124E 1.11124fi 30.2224E 11.3331 11.3131 11.11241 25.0)268 25.DRGE 50.1453E )5.11804 ]5.21804 210.71 940320007 HU83 M Medium Residential]-12 Du/ACMax) SP-15 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-15) 12.7171631522C 15.673E 15.6739 31.34781 47.02171 47.021)1 "1.J39 94433000) IWISERMAN DONALD PO Professional Office PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) 3.0699220fi311 Ves 30.00OOO000000 17.26831 20.]219) 31.082:6 6107 25 944330008 GOSPEL RECORDINGS H High Residential(13-20 Du/ACMax) H HIGH DENSITY RES(H) 1.7428188256E Ves 30A0000000000 9.803356 11.76403 1].64604 39.21341 1" 90015 KAISERMAN DONALD M Medlum Resldentlal(7-12 Du/ACMax) M MEDIUM DENSITY RES(M) 11.39702339343 Yes 30.00000000000 64.10826 76.92991 115.394E 256.433 9443]0001 TEM ECUTAVILIAGEDEV PO Professional Office POO-5 PLANNEO OEV OVER �PDO-5) 0.937314031711., 30.DD W000000 5,272391 6,32687 9.490305 21.0895) 9443]0010 TEMECULA VILLAGE DEV PO Professional Office PDO-5 PLANNED DEV OVERLAY �PDD-5) 1.)12418)136fi Yes 30.00000000000 9.632355 11.55883 17.33830 38.52942 9...15 LEWIS CECELIA L Low Residential(0.5-2Du/ACMax) L-1 LOW DENSITY RES �L-1) 2.09339]3413C 2.00000000000 3.14009E 3.14009fi 945300005 NARON PACIFIC INC L Low Residential (0.5-2Du/ACMax) L-1 LOW DENSITY RES �L-1) 18.56052135404 2.00000000000 21.8407E 27.84078 94516001E MARGIOTTA LAMES P VL Very Low Residential(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES DVQ 0.66828941027 0.4 0200487 0200487 9443]OOOfi TEMECULA VILLAGE DEV PO Professional Office PDO-5 PLANNED DEN OVERLAY(PDO-5) 0.83631R03584 Yes 30.00000OMON 4.704289 5.645147 8.46772 18.81711 945090003 G& A THOMAS PROP LTD L Low Residential (OS-2Du/ACMax) L-1 LOW DENSITY RES (L-1) 4.15834616791 2.00000000000 6.237519 6.23J519 9451W022 MARGIOTTA IAMESP VL Very Low Residential l0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 11151191171 0.9 0.97076E 0.970766 944290017 0SERMAN DONALD M Medium Residential(7-12 DU/ACMax) M MEDIUM DENSITY RES(M) 7.99094738469 1200000000000 71.91853 71.91853 94518000fi GROMMISCH ROBERTG VL Very Low Resitlential �0.2-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 10.3019495157C 0.4 3.030585 3.030585 945180.12 GROMMISCH ROBERTG VL Very Low Residential �0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 3.45063801623 0.4 1.0351911.035191 949330019 GLOBAL HOTEL NETWORK INC HT Hlghway Tourist Commerclal SP-2 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-2) 1.3911111311 4 4.J53031 4,711016 94509000l NARON PACIFIC INC L Low Resitlential(0.5-2Du/ACMax) L-1 LOW DENSITY RES:L-1) 4.7133788010E 2.000000MOM 7.069]68 7.069768 945090007 RICHA PROP L L. Residential(0.5-2Du/ACMax) L-1 LOWDENSITY RES �L-1) 2.1265456233] 2.000000D0000 3.18981E 3.189818 9112"' :!MO Ell SAL VL Very Low Residential(0.2-idDu/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 2.63591952805 0.4 03Z 760.790776 94512.009 $IMONETTI SAL VL Very Low Residemial l0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 21.575415016J8 0.4 6.472625 94514000] MACHINECRAFTOFSAN DIEGO INC VL Very Low Residential �0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �NL) 5.2104084535E 0.4 1472625 1.563123 1.563123 919131009 FISHER THOMASN VL Very Law Residemial(0Z-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 0.177713121 0.4 0.164fi33 0.164633 919191007 CAMMARATA JACQUELINE M VL Very Low Residemial(0Z0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 0.65408278292 0.4 0.196225 0.196225 945070009 LALEZARI VICTORH L Low Residential l05-2Du/ACMax) L-1 LOWDENSITV RES �L-1) 1.39115774]51 2.000000DOo' 2.086737 2.08673J 945100019 TERICHMIKEJOHN L Low Resitlential l00V/AC Max) L-1 L0W DENSITY RES �11) 5.74364143579 20000000000O 8.615462 8.615462 94032000fi HUO3 H High Residemial(13-20 Du/ACMax) SP-15 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-15) 5.1.141187362 6.393485 6.393485 12.78697 19.18046 19.16046 63.93485 94437013' TEM ECULAVILIAGEDEV PO Professional Office PD0-5 PLANNED DIN OVERLAY O.J4G41474808 Ves 30.00000000000 4.198583 5.113 7.157" 16.J9433 9" 7000] TEMECULAVIUAGEDEV PO Profession al Office VD0-5 PLANNEDDEVOVERLAY IPDO-5) 0.9853399J95J Ves 30.000L%10L100o0 5.542537 6.651045 9.9J6567 22.1]O15 921112007 ROLF LAWRENCE0 VL Very Low Residential(0.2-0.4 DV/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 0,67W 333548 OA 0,201.11 0.202819 945070003 NARON PACIFIC INC L LDw Residemial(0.5-2 Du/AC Max) L-1 LOW DENSITY RES (L-1) 2.47376182039 2.00000000000 3.710643 3.7I= 9113001 GROMM15CH ROBERT G VL Very Low Residemial(OZ OA Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RE: 8.06555333884 0.4 2.419666 2.4196fifi 921242009 HSIEH CHI HSIANG VL Very Low Residential l0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �NL) 0.]2012309932 0.4 0.21603) O21603J 921330025 ABC CHILDCARE CENTER PO Professional Office PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE(PD) 0.94975530739 Yes 30.0000000OOM 5,342374 6.41084E 9.616272 21.36949 9221W 38 CHANG ROGER SPI Specific Plan Implementation SP-5 SPECIFIC PUN(SP-S) 0.8J076941318 30 2.220462 2.220462 4.440924 6.661386 6.661386 2220462 922300017 MARTIN DOROTHYF VL Very Low Residential(0.1-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 4.6319996fi194 0.4 1.3896 13896 922130025 UPPALRUPINDER M Medlum R-d11U1I(7-12 Du/ACMax) M MEDIUM DENSITY RES(M) 43.49404115289 12.00Ol%1000000 160.9642 260.9642 944060009 WILFORD LTD PARTNERSHIP H High Residemial(13-20 Uu/ACMax) H HIGH DENSITY RES(H) 1.77139264041 Yes 30.000000MOM 9.964084 119569 17.93535 39.85633 94429001fi RAISER MAN DONALD M Medium Resid-tial(7-12 Du/ACMax) M MEDIUM DENSITY RES (M) 8AL.27.27899 12.00000000000 52AR167 51.86167 955050015 CDR P OF PRES BISH CH OF IESUS CHRIST LDS VL Very Low Residemial(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 1.21225769872 DA 0.363677 0.3fi3677 949370013 TEMECULAVIUAGEDEV PO Professional OfflCe PD0.5 PLANNED DEN OVERLAY(PDO-5) 1:111013180 Ves 30.000DO000000 9.833179 11.79981 17.69972 39.33271 9450]0016 IALEZARI VICTOR H L Low Resitlential (0.5-20u/ACMax) L-1 LOW DENSITY RES (L-1) 0.64100920552 LOOOOOOOOOOO 0.961514 0.961514 945090020 NARON PACIFIC INC L LDw Residemial (0.5-2Du/ACMax) L-1 LOW DENSITY RES (L-1) 6.6511986968E 2.00000000000 9.97679E 9.97679E 94511000E DOZEKCORP L Low Residemial(0.5-id L-1 LOW DENSITY RES (L-1) 3.62939619539 2.00000000000 5.444090 SA44094 955050031 TELESIOJOHNH VL Very Low Resldential(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 1.05302559259 0.9 0.31590E 0.31590E 945120001 SIMS ARTHURJTRUST VL Very Low Residemial(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.93393695121 0.4 0.8W181 0.880181 945120002 SIMS ARTHURJTRUST VL Very Low Residential(0.1-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 2.61991" 7' 1.4 0.71751,711111 N5120DO7 SIMONETTI SAL VL Very Low Residemial(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 4.86962539]33 DA 1.4fi0888 1Afi0888 95504002/ BAY KENNETHG VL Very Low Resldentlal(0.1-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 2.07330719284 0.4 0.6291932 0.621932 95505001E KLOCK L0Y0 S VL Very Low Residential �0.2-0.4 DU/Ac Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �NL) 1.31135128831 0.4 0.393405 0.393405 955050034 TELESIOJOHNH VL Very Low Residemial(0.2-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 0.80]77341251 1.4 0.2423321.2132 95505001E KLOCK LOYDS VL Very Low Residentia1(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 4.J89J3681644 0.4 1.436914 1.436910 95]U80014 SERAPHINA DEVELOPMENT LM Low Medlum Resitlentlal(3-6 Du/ACMax) LM LOW MED DENSITY RES�LM) 30.19113984589 6.00OOCOIXIOl10 90.86013 90.86013 957080019 SERAPHINADEVfLOPMENT LM Low Metlium Resitlential (3-60u/ACMax) IM LOW MFO DENSITY RES � UM) 8.7913726073C 6.00000000000 39.56028 39.56028 957170031 GORHAM ROBERT LAMES VL Very Low Residential(0.1-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 2.0914416420C 1.4 0.627431 0.62J432 95J120017 FITZ DENNIS VL Very Low Residential(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 2.0075877fi424 0.4 O.fi03276 0.60227' 1:10012 HIRINA MARIANI VL Very Low Residentiall0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 3.16125806101 0.4 0.648377 0.648377 957080018 LASAGNA LAWRENCE T VL Very Low Resitlential (0.2-0.4 DU/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 4.5465388594E 0.4 1.363962 1.363962 957120005 CORPOF PRES BISHOP CH OF IESUS CHRIST LDS VL Very Low Residemial(0.2-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 19.76533561081 1.4 5.929fi01 5.929601 95J090010 RUBIANO REMEGIO VL Very Low Residemial(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 4.91668333852 0.4 1.47M51.475005 957090015 CORP OF PRES BISHOP CH OF IESUS CH RIST LDS VL Very Low Res ldemlal:0.1-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 4.8917"1J79B 0.4 1.46)5311.467531 957120009 C0RP OF PRES BISHOP CH 0F1ESU5 CHRIST L05 VL Very Low Resitlential �0.2-0.40u/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �NL) 9.0412376977] 0.4 2.]12371 2.7123]I 9573'13 TANG FRANKQ VL Very Low Residen[ial(0.2-0.4 Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 2.452J2543535 1.4 0.-L. 0.73581E 957340024 RUBIANO REMEGIO VL Very Low Residential (0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 3.05200965604 0.4 0.915fiO3 0.915603 955040005 BLAIR WILLIAMD VL Very Low Resldential �ll.2-O4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 3.258412J223B 0.4 0.977524 0.9J]524 955050003 TELESIO JOHNH VL Very Low Resitlential �D2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �NL) 1.02334888264 0.4 0,307005 0.3070is 955050033 KOCZARSKI JACK VL Very Low Residemial(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 0.92123611961 0.4 0.276371 0.176371 95]340021 YANG MOONS VL Very Low Residemial(OZ Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) fi.03098332872 0.4 1.809295 1.809295 95]1121 YANG MOON VL Very Low Resldentlal(0.1-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 2.53212386102 0.4 0.759637 0.759637 957170040 TIDWELL NORMA ALINE VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.4 DU/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 4.09663172895 0.4 1.22899 1,22899 957340022 YANG MOONS VL Very Low Residential(0.1-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 3.64678286035 1.4 1.ON 351.094035 95734003E BEAUDOIN GILLES VL Very Low Residemial(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 4.9:301175171 0.4 1.49)905 1A97905 159050009 RITCHIE HUGHI VL Very Low Resltlentla1:0.1-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 3.3862J019991 M1963 0.4 1.0158811.015881 957120003 CORP OF PRES BISHOP CH OF IESUS CHRIST LOS VL Very Low Residential �0.2-0.4 DU/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �NL) 3.795629 0.4 1.1387741.1387]4 9:1 117 ERRICO JOSEPHR VL III Residential(0.2-0.4Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 2.29658067885 1.4 0.688374 0.6883774 957340D25 RUBIANO REMEGIO VL Very Low Residential (0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 5.4J444293216 0.4 1.642333 1.642333 95. 002 CAL PASEO DEL SOL LM Low Metllum Resltlemlal(3-6 Du/ACMax) SP-4 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-4) 21.3396085080E 6 1..31 108.832 962o1000] SPM WOLF CANYON CC Comm unity Commercial SP-12 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-12) 12ol31919902C 30.00000000000 3M.3364 306.3364 9fi2020001 RH ACQUISITION CO M Medium Residemial()-12 Du/ACMax) SP-9 SPECIFIC PUN(SP-9) 6.6299986fi1" 12.00000000000 67.62599 ST '99 95J08o017 LASAGNA LAWRENCE T VL Very Low Res idential(0.2-OA Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 4.5290J73fi382 0.4 1.358723 1.358723 95715002C CERNOUSEK MARTA VL Very Low ResId Ial (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 5:14511884249 0.4 1.543656 1,511616 964460003 WINGSWEEPCORP L Low Resitlential (0.5-20u/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 2.0851313321E 200000000000 3.544]23 3.544723 964640002 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION L Low Residemial (0.5-2 DUI Max) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 6.36068733425 1.0000oMoo 0 10.81317 10.81317 9fi44fi0015 WINGSWEEPCORP M Medium Residemial(7-12 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAIN (SP-11) 4.84800429079 10.00000000000 41.Z804 41.208N 96464001E RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION M Metllum Resldential (J-12 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 12.1221317011 10.00000000000 303.0399 103.0399 964460009 WINGSWEEP CORP M Metlium Resitlential (]-120u/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 35.9972429117E 10.00000000000 135.976E 135.976E 9644fi0014 WINGSWEEPCORP L Low Residemial(03-2Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 4.71833093049 2.000000WOW 8.038129 8.038129 964:30005 RORIPAUGHVALLEYRESTORATION LM Low Medium Residential(3-6 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFICPIAN (SP-11) 34.J2787502365 6.00Oo000o000 177.1123 177.1122 964640004 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION L Low Resid-lal(0.5-2Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PIN(SP-11) 17.4936094099E 2.000000WON 29.73914 21,71111 96446001] WINGSWEEPCORP M Medium Resitlential (]-120u/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-11) 9.07580412911 10.00000000000 77.14434 14434 9644fi0018 WINGSWEEP<ORP M Medium Residential (J-12 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 1.22951583551 1owo0000000 10.4506E 10.4508E 964640015 RORIPAUGHVALLEYRESTORATION M Medium Residemial(7-12 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-11) 20.04829400505 10A0000000000 170.4105 1)0.4305 9646'o' RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION LM Low Medlum Resld-W(3-6 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PIN(SP-11) 24.62049243501 6.00OOCOON. 125.5645125.5645 964640003 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION L Low Resitlential(0.5-2Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-11) IU.74151244008 LOOOOODOW. 18.26057 18.26057 964630006 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION LM Low Medium Resitlential(3-6 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 7.87961]23124 6.000000WON 40.18605 40.18601 964640013 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION M Medium Residemial(7-12 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 32.57299063354 10A0000000000 191.8]04 191.8J04 964661011 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION M Medlum Resltlential(7-12 Du/ACMax) SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 0.]6189146R2 1o.000IX1000000 6.476077 6.476077 959400001 CAL PASEO DEL SOL LM Low Metlium Residential(36 DVAC Max) SP-4 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-4) 20.9]37:142721 6 106.9662 106.9612 961020026 SPM WOLF CANYON NC Neighborhood Commercial SP-12 SPECIFICPLAN (SP-12) 7.80685662523 20.00000000000 132.7166 132.716fi E6"'008 WINGSWEEPCORP NC Neighborhood Commercial SP-11 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 15.2106231055E 10A000o000000 114.0797 119.2903 909270024 VARELA LORENZO SC Service Commerclal SP-14 SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-14) 0.8373298821J Ves 30.000000000D0 2,135191 2.135191 4.270382 6.1111.1511 21.31191 909282013 91027200E KEETON eRUCEG HOFFINV IP Sc Industrial Park Service Commercial SP-14 SP-14 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-14) SPECIFIC PUN(SP-14) 0.6485701333E Yes 1.19670032486 Ves 30.00000000000 30.DOOD0000000 1.653854 1.653854 3.30770E 4.961562 4.961562 16.53854 3.051586 3.051586 6.103172 9.154757 9.154757 30.51586 9213301)" ABCCHILOCARECENTER PO Professional Offim PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE(PD) 4.81334253903 Ves 30A0000000000 27.07505 32-DOE 48.73509 108.3001 910282002 JAPANINVINC HT Hlghway -I. --dal SP-14 SPECIFIC PI (SP-14) 0.1329045230C Yes 30.000D0000000 2.'2390) 2.123907 4.247813 6.37172 6.37172 21.23907 12,53037 S&LHASAN INC SPI SpeciffC Plan lmplememation Sp-5 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) 0.67547373453 30 1.722458 1.722458 3.444916 5AG7374 5,167374 17.22458 919051010 GEN ERAL TELEPHONE CO OF CALIF VL IN Low ­idemia1(0.2-0.4 Du/ACM..) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 0.67570MO725 0.4 0.202712 0.202712 91915200E PRICE JACQUELYN M VL IN Low Resideatia1(0.1-0A Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 0.6)453799677 0.4 0.202361 0.202361 9201100M TSENG LIN SHU YIN NC Nelghlwdtood Commercial NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMM (NC) 6.36235347762 12.000OOowom 57.26118 57,26118 919331010 PACE CURTISA VL IN Low Residential(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 0.53030096774 0.4 0.15909 0.15909 919430012 WASEKIOSEPH VL IN Low Residemia1(0.1-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 0.738)7690155 0.4 0.221633 0.221633 919311005 PULIDO CRAIG VL IN Low Residentia1(0.2-0A Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 0.93207088208 0.4 0.279621 0.279621 919210015 KO NORMANL VL IN Low Resldentlal(0.2-0.4 Du/ACM,,) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 0.8259447001C 0.4 0.247783 0.24])83 921231001 CASTELLANO DAVID S VL Very Low Residentia1:0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 0.60654658067 0.4 0.181964 0.181969 9212310.2 CASTELLANODAVID S VL Very Low Residential �0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 1.04244916876 0.4 0.311735 0.312J35 :21162002 LABONTE GREGORYA VL Very Low Residentia1(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES(VL) 0.5444fi465871 0A 0.163339 O.1fi3339 910271002 VNE-13 S SC Service Commercial SC SERVICE COMMERCIAL (SC) 6 14432 79206 20.000OOOL10000 92.1649 92.1649 95)090022 NGOIAM VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERV LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 4.54]54894004 0.4 1.364265 1.1142El 95)15001) VANYO SCOTT VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 4.81293897831 0.4 1.446882 1.446882 95J1J0029 GORHAM ROBERT LAMES VL Very Low Residential Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 2.2743954624C 0.9 0112311 0.612319 95734003E BEAUDOIN GILLES VL 10.2-OA Very Low 0.esldea[Ial �O.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.51349330305 0.4 0.75409E 0.)54048 95)34003] READ OINGILLES VL Very Low Residential:0.2-0.4 DU/AC Max) VL VERV LOW DENSIIV RES �VL) 2.4685552563E 0.4 0,746567 0.746567 922190013 EL DORADO HOMES VL Very Low Residential �0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 3.1661687100E 0.4 0.949881 0.949881 94516000] PATEL KIRITKUMAR R VL Very Low Residentia1(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 3.3297599473E 0.9 0.998928 0.998928 9451W 15 NGUYEN THUAN THI VL Very Low Resldentlal(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 2.92433098219 0.4 0.81729: 0.67]399 90.514000E MACHINE CRAFT OF SAN DIEGO INC VL Very Low Residentia1:0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 4.55286014063 0.4 1.36585E 1.36585E 945020010 WU MEI CHEN VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 2.3310749305] 0.4 0.6993221.691322 94515001fi 31111 PESCADI VL Very Low Residentia1(0.2-OA Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.323631761:1 0.9 O.fi9J092 0.697092 945170005 31011 PESCADO VL Very Low Reside0tia110.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 3.63175284552 0.4 0.7. 26 0.789526 94503001E MAYORGA JOSER VL Very Low Residential(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2,32772799104 0.4 0.698318 0.698318 945070001 LAU-1 VICTOR L Low ­id-2 Du/ACMax) 11 LOW DENSITY RES(L-1) 2.)49J31681J3 1.000000000DC 4.12459E 4.124598 945170006 HADDAD MICHAEL5 VL Very Low Resideatial(0.1-OA Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.65.714fi954 0.9 0.796941 0.)96961 945180023 GROMMISCH ROBERT G VL Very Low Resldeatla1(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.151138111 0.4 0.)6516) 0.)6516J 90.5150011 TPMC SERVICES VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.40u/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 2.9357196582C 0.4 0.880]I6 0.88071E 922200010 EMMI ELEANORF VL Very Low Residemial (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 4.0550631367E 0.4 1.2161111.216519 955040002 BLAIR WILLIAMD VL Very Low Residential(0.2-OA Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 1.J348fi11142 0.9 0.52045E 0.52045E 95]33001] TURGEON JOSEPH6 VL Very Low Resldea[Ial (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.0397359511E 0.4 0.611921 0.611921 95)130022 TURGEON IOSEPHG VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.40u/ACMax) VL VERV LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 4,33:4813107] 0.4 1.300644 10 W644 95J330020 TURGEON JOSEPHG VL Very Low Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 3.4615992910] 0.4 0.7386E 0.7384E 95J370003 JONESROBERTC VL Very Low Residential �0.2-OA Du/AC Max) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES (VL) 4.9621fi1452 0.4 1.4 6" 1.48864E 959010013 MUSIC AMYL VL Very Low Residential �02-040u/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 3.2554849J]96 D. 0.976645 0.976645 959030014 KARPOU11S PARASKEVAS VL Very Low Residential �0.20.40u/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSIIV RES �VL) 2.41479953554 0.4 0.77. 0.)2444 95901000fi ALTSHULER IEFFREY MARTIN VL Very Law Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 2.43020100333 O4 0.7230E 0.7230E 959010011 MUSIC AMYL VL Very Low Residential 10.20.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.38554485141 0.9 0.715fi6: 0.)15fi63 95'10005 ALTSHULER IEFFREY MARTIN VL Very Low Resldeatla1(0.2-0.4 Du/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES:VL) 3.0J850994529 0.4 0.923553 0.923553 955U50012 KLOCK LOYDS VL Very Low Residential(0.2-0.4 )u/ACMax) VL VERY LOW DENSITY RES �VL) 2.65630187557 0A 0.]96891 0.796891 S64640011 RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION M Medium Residential(]-12 Du/ACMax) SPAL SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-11) 2.9171:13J11 10.000000D0000 24.)9934 24.79931 940320005 TEMECULAWESTVILIAGE SPI Specific Plan Implementation SP-15 SPECIFIC PLAN 19.61389543J05 24.1J413 24.1J413 48.34825 J2.52238 J2.52238 241.J413 922210049 TEMECUTA WEST VILLAGE SPI Spe<Iflc Plan Implementation SP-15 SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-15) 54.80545628053 6).547]2 67.59)72 135.0954 202.6432 202.6432 6J5.4)72 96141000E NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION HT Highway Tourist Commercial HT HIGHWAY/TOURIST COMM (HT) 2.11205103)01 20.00000000000 31.680E 31.68D8 9fi5400001 STAGE&PORTOLA M Medium Residential(]-12 Du/ACMax) M MEDIUM DENSITY RES(M) 8.5J559884431 12.00000000000 51.45359 51.45359 9fi5400001 STAGE&PORTOLA LM Low Medium Residential I— Du/ACMax) LM LOW MED DENSITY RES(LM) 11.87154414054 6.00000000000 53.42195 53.=5S This page intentionally left blank. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX B: GLOSSARY d ECULA CI E N IER-AL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE APPENDIX B: HOUSING ELEMENT GLOSSARY Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU): An attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family or multifamily dwelling is or will be situated. Acre: A unit of land measure equal to 43,560 square feet. Acreage, Net: The portion of a site exclusive of existing or planned public or private road rights -of -way. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH): As required by California Assembly Bill 686, the City of Temecula has a duty to affirmatively further fair housing by taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Affordability Covenant: A property title agreement which places resale or rental restrictions on a housing unit. Affordable Housing: Under state and federal statutes, housing which costs no more than 30 percent of gross household income. Housing costs include rent or mortgage payments, utilities, taxes, insurance, homeowner association fees, and other related costs. Area Median Income (AMI): The AMI is determined by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and is the midpoint income for the area —half of all wage earners have salaries higher than the median, and half of all wage earners have salaries lower than the median. Each year, HUD sets area median incomes for the Riverside area. The AMI is then used to establish income limits for certain housing programs. Annexation: The incorporation of land area into the jurisdiction of an existing city with a resulting change in the boundaries of that city. Assisted Housing: Housing that has been subsidized by federal, state, or local housing programs. At -Risk Housing: Multi -family rental housing that is at risk of losing its status as housing affordable for low and moderate income tenants due to the expiration of federal, state or local agreements. California Department of Housing and Community Development — HCD: The State Department responsible for administering State -sponsored housing programs and for reviewing housing elements to determine compliance with state housing law. Census: The official United States decennial enumeration of the population conducted by the federal government. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): A grant program administered by HUD. This grant allots money to cities and counties for housing rehabilitation and community development activities, including public facilities and economic development. Condominium: A building or group of buildings in which units are owned individually, but the structure, common areas and facilities are owned by all owners on a proportional, undivided basis. Congregate Care: Apartment housing, usually for senior citizens, or for the disabled in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 50062.5 that is arranged in a group setting that includes independent living and sleeping accommodations in conjunction with shared dining and recreational facilities (see Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.34.0103). Congregate Living Health Facility: A facility with a noninstitutional, home -like environment that provides inpatient care, including the following basic services: medical supervision, twenty- four hour skilled nursing and supportive care, pharmacy, dietary, social recreational, and at least one type of service specified in the Health and Safety Code. The primary need of congregate living health facility residents shall be for availability of skilled nursing care on a recurring, intermittent, extended or continuous basis. This care is generally less intense than that provided in general acute care hospitals but more intense than that provided in skilled nursing facilities (see Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.34.010.13). Density: The number of dwelling units per unit of land. Density usually is expressed "per acre," e.g., a development with 100 units located on 20 acres has density of 5.0 units per acre. Density Bonus: The allowance of additional residential units beyond the maximum for which the parcel is otherwise permitted usually in exchange for the provision or preservation of affordable housing units at the same site or at another location. H Development Impact Fees (DIF): A fee or charge imposed on developers to pay for a jurisdiction's costs of providing services to � r new development. U Development Right: The right granted to a land owner or other authorized party to improve a property. Such right is usually I expressed in terms of a use and intensity allowed under existing 1 zoning regulation. For example, a development right may specify the maximum number of residential dwelling units permitted per acre of land. Dwelling, Multi -family: A building containing two or more dwelling units for the use of individual households; an apartment or condominium building is an example of this dwelling unit type. Dwelling, Single-family Attached: A one -family dwelling attached to one or more other one -family dwellings by a common vertical wall. Row houses and town homes are examples of this dwelling unit type. Dwelling, Single-family Detached: A dwelling, not attached to any other dwelling, which is designed for and occupied by not more than one family and surrounded by open space or yards. Dwelling Unit: One or more rooms, designed, occupied or intended for occupancy as separate living quarters, with cooking, sleeping and sanitary facilities provided within the unit for the exclusive use of a household. Efficiency Unit Housing: Any residential building containing five or more individual secure rooms intended or designed to be used or which are used rented or hired out to be occupied for sleeping purposes by residents as their primary residence. Elderly Household: As defined by HUD, elderly households are one- or two- member (family or non -family) households in which the head or spouse is age 62 or older. Element: A division or chapter of the General Plan. Emergency Shelter: An emergency shelter is a facility that provides shelter to homeless families and/or homeless individuals on a limited short-term basis. Fair Market Rent (FMR): Fair Market Rents (FMRs) are freely set rental rates defined by HUD as the median gross rents charged for available standard units in a county or Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). Fair Market Rents are used for the Section 8 Rental Program and many other HUD programs and are published annually by HUD. First -Time Home Buyer (FTHB): Defined by HUD as an individual or family who has not owned a home during the three-year period preceding the HUD -assisted purchase of a home. Jurisdictions may adopt local definitions for first-time home buyer programs which differ from non -federally funded programs. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): The gross floor area of all buildings on a lot divided by the lot area; usually expressed as a numerical value (e.g., a building having 10,000 square feet of gross floor area located on a lot of 5,000 square feet in area has a floor area ratio of 2.0). Group Home: The City of Temecula's Zoning Code defines a group home as any residential care facility for six or fewer persons which is licensed by the state (Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.344.810.13). General Plan: The General Plan is a legal document, adopted by the legislative body of a City or County, setting forth policies regarding long-term development. California law requires the preparation of seven elements or chapters in the General Plan: Land Use, Housing, Circulation, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, and Safety. Additional elements are permitted, such as Economic Development, Urban Design and similar local concerns. Group Quarters: A facility which houses groups of unrelated persons not living in households (US Census definition). Examples of group quarters include institutions, dormitories, shelters, military quarters, assisted living facilities and other quarters, including single - room occupancy (SRO) housing, where 10 or more unrelated individuals are housed. Growth Management: Techniques used by a government to regulate the rate, amount, location and type of development. HCD: The State Department of Housing and Community Development. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA): The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act requires larger lending institutions making home mortgage loans to publicly disclose the location and disposition of home purchase, refinance and improvement loans. Institutions subject to HMDA must also disclose the gender, race, and income of loan applicants. Homeless: Unsheltered homeless are families and individuals whose primary nighttime residence is a public or private place not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings (e.g., the street, sidewalks, cars, vacant and abandoned buildings). Sheltered homeless are families and persons whose primary nighttime residence is a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter (e.g., emergency, transitional, battered women, and homeless youth shelters; and commercial hotels or motels used to house the homeless). Household: The US Census Bureau defines a household as all persons living in a housing unit whether or not they are related. A single person living in an apartment as well as a family living in a house is considered a household. Household does not include individuals living in dormitories, prisons, convalescent homes, or other group quarters. Household Income: The total income of all the persons living in a household. A household is usually described as very low income, low income, moderate income, and upper income based upon household size, and income, relative to the regional median income. Housing Problems: Defined by HUD as a household which: (1) occupies a unit with physical defects (lacks complete kitchen or bathroom); (2) meets the definition of overcrowded; or (3) spends more than 30% of income on housing cost. Housing Subsidy: Housing subsidies refer to government assistance aimed at reducing housing sales or rent prices to more affordable levels. Two general types of housing subsidy exist. Where a housing subsidy is linked to a particular house or apartment, housing subsidy is "project" or "unit" based. In Section 8 rental assistance programs the subsidy is linked to the family and assistance provided to any number of families accepted by willing private landlords. This type of subsidy is said to be "tenant based." Housing Unit: A room or group of rooms used by one or more individuals living separately from others in the structure, with direct access to the outside or to a public hall and containing separate toilet and kitchen facilities. HUD: See US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Income Category: Four categories are used to classify a household according to income based on the median income for the county. Under state housing statutes, these categories are defined as follows: Very Low (0-50% of County median); Low (50-80% of County H 0 U S N G median); Moderate (80-120% of County median); and Upper (over 120% of County median). Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU): A unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and contained entirely within an existing single-family structure. A junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities, or may share sanitation facilities with the existing structure Large Household: A household with 5 or more members. Low Income Home Energy Act Program (LIHEAP): LIHEAP helps pay the winter heating bills or summer cooling bills of low- income and elderly people. Manufactured Housing: Housing that is constructed of manufactured components, assembled partly at the site rather than totally at the site. Also referred to as modular housing. Market Rate Housing: Housing which is available on the open market without any subsidy. The price for housing is determined by the market forces of supply and demand and varies by location. Median Income: The annual income for each household size within a region which is defined annually by HUD. Half of the households in the region have incomes above the median and half have incomes below the median. Mobile Home: A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is at least 8 feet in width and 32 feet in length, is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling unit when connected to the required utilities, either with or without a permanent foundation. Mobile Home Park Assistance Program (MPAP): To preserve affordable housing opportunities found within mobile home parks, HCD provides financial and technical assistance to low income mobile home park residents through MPAP. MPAP provides loans of up to 50% of the purchase price plus the conversion costs of the mobile home park so that low income residents, or organizations formed by low income residents can own and/or operate the mobile home park. Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC): Administered by Riverside County, and authorized by Congress in the Tax Reform Act of 1984, the MCC provides assistance to first-time homebuyers for the purchase of owner -occupied single-family homes, townhomes, and condominiums. An MCC reduces the amount of federal income taxes otherwise due but not to exceed the amount of federal taxes owed for the year after other credits and deductions have been taken. (Unused tax credits can be carried forward three years, until used.) H Mortgage Revenue Bond (MRB): A state, county or city program providing financing for the development of housing through the sale of tax-exempt bonds. U Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP): The Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) was I established in March of 2004. The plan encompasses 1.2 million acres 1 in the western Riverside County and is designated to protect 146 species. Overcrowding: As defined by the US Census, a household with greater than 1.01 persons per room, excluding bathrooms, kitchens, hallways, and porches. Severe overcrowding is defined as households with greater than 1.5 persons per room. Office of Planning and Research (OPR): The Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) provides legislative and policy research support for the Governor's office. OPR also assists the Governor and the Administration in land -use planning and manages the Office of the Small Business Advocate. Overpayment: The extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed 30 percent of gross household income, based on data published by the US Census Bureau. Severe overpayment, or cost burden, exists if gross housing costs exceed 50 percent of gross income. Parcel: The basic unit of land entitlement. A designated area of land established by plat, subdivision, or otherwise legally defined and permitted to be used, or built upon. Poverty: The income cutoffs used by the Census Bureau to determine the poverty status of families and unrelated individuals included a set of 48 thresholds. The poverty thresholds are revised annually to allow for changes in the cost of living as reflected in the Consumer Price Index. The average threshold for a family of four persons in 1989 was $12,674. Poverty thresholds were applied on a national basis and were not adjusted for regional, state, or local variations in the cost of living. Project -Based Rental Assistance: Rental assistance provided for a project, not for a specific tenant. A tenant receiving project -based rental assistance gives up the right to that assistance upon moving from the project. Public Housing: A project -based low -rent housing program operated by independent local public housing authorities. A low- income family applies to the local public housing authority in the area in which they want to live. Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA): The RHNA is based on State of California projections of population growth and housing unit demand and assigns a share of the region's future housing need to each jurisdiction within the SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) region. These housing need numbers serve as the basis for the update of the Housing Element in each California city and county. Rehabilitation: The upgrading of a building previously in a dilapidated or substandard condition for human habitation or use. Section 8 Rental Voucher/Certificate Program: A tenant -based rental assistance program that subsidizes a family's rent in a privately owned house or apartment. The program is administered by local public housing authorities. Assistance payments are based on 30 percent of household annual income. Households with incomes of 50 percent or below the area median income are eligible to participate in the program. Service Needs: The particular services required by special populations, typically including needs such as transportation, personal care, housekeeping, counseling, meals, case management, personal emergency response, and other services preventing premature institutionalization and assisting individuals to continue living independently. Small Household: Pursuant to HUD definition, a small household consists of two to four non -elderly persons. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG): The Southern California Association of Governments is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) which encompasses six counties: Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura. SCAG is responsible for preparation of the RHNA. Special Needs Groups: Those segments of the population which have a more difficult time finding decent affordable housing due to special circumstances. Under California Housing Element statutes, these special needs groups consist of the elderly, handicapped, large families, female -headed households, farm workers and the homeless. A jurisdiction may also choose to consider additional special needs groups in the Housing Element, such as students, military households, other groups present in their community. Single -Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing: Any residential building containing five or more individual secure rooms intended or H designed to be used, or which are used, rented, or hired out, to be occupied for sleeping purposes by residents as their primary residence. U Subdivision: The division of a lot, tract or parcel of land in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.). I Substandard Housing: Housing which does not meet the minimum N standards contained in the State Housing Code (i.e., does not provide shelter, endangers the health, safety or well-being of occupants). Jurisdictions may adopt more stringent local definitions of substandard housing. Substandard, Suitable for Rehabilitation: Substandard units which are structurally sound and for which the cost of rehabilitation is considered economically warranted. Substandard, Needs Replacement: Substandard units which are structurally unsound and for which the cost of rehabilitation is considered infeasible, such as instances where the majority of a unit has been damaged by fire. Supportive Housing: A facility that provides housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population as defined by Section 50675.14 of the California Health and Safety Code, and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist tenants in retaining housing, improving their health status, maximizing their ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. Supportive Services: Services provided to residents of supportive housing for the purpose of facilitating the independence of residents. Some examples are case management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, child care, transportation, and job training. Tenant -Based Rental Assistance: A form of rental assistance in which the assisted tenant may move from a dwelling unit with a right to continued assistance. The assistance is provided for the tenant, not for the project. Transitional Housing: A residential facility that provides rental housing accommodations and support services for persons and families, but restricts occupancy to no more than 24 months. Support services may include meals, counseling, and other services. Uniform Building Code (UBC): First enacted by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) in 1927, the UBC provides standards for building codes. Revised editions of this code are published approximately every 3 years. US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): The cabinet level department of the federal government responsible for housing, housing assistance, and urban development at the national level. Housing programs administered through HUD include CDBG, HOME and Section 8, among others. Western Regional Council of Governments (WRCOG): WRCOG consists of representatives from all 14 cities and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, which have seats on the WRCOG Executive Committee, the group that sets policy for the organization. Together, as a joint powers agency, they take up regional matters, from air quality to solid waste and from transportation to the environment. Zoning: A land use regulatory measure enacted by local government. Zoning district regulations governing lot size, building bulk, placement, and other development standards vary from district to district, but must be uniform within the same district. Each city and county adopts a zoning ordinance specifying these regulations. CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX C: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY d ECULA CI E N IER-AL PLAN CYCLE 6 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE Community Survey Report City of Temecula Housing Element Update OCTOBER 2020 In partnership with De Novo Planning Group Contents Introduction............................................................................................................ 3 Survey Respondent Demographics...........................................................................3 Survey Responses Executive Summary.....................................................................4 VALUES AND PRIORITIES......................................................................................4 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY....................................................................................7 HOUSING MAINTENANCE....................................................................................8 HOUSINGFIT.....................................................................................................11 GENERALFEEDBACK..........................................................................................13 AppendixA: Survey..............................................................................................A-1 Appendix B: Summary of All Survey Responses..................................................... B-1 Appendix C: Summary of All Survey Responses by Group ....................................... C-1 Figures Figure 1: Why have you chosen to live in Temecula?.................................................5 Figure 2: If you wish to own a home in Temecula but do not currently own one, what issues are preventing you from owning a home at this time?....................................8 Figure 3: Which of the following housing upgrades or expansions have you considered making on your home?..........................................................................9 Figure 4: How would you rate the physical condition of the residence you live in? ... 10 Figure 5: Do you feel that the different housing types in Temecula currently meet your housing needs?.............................................................................................11 Figure 6: What types of housing are most needed in the City of Temecula? ............. 12 Fa Introduction The City of Temecula is updating its Housing Element as part of the 2021-2029 Housing Element Cycle (Cycle 6). Temecula is dedicated to meeting the future housing needs of its residents. The Housing Element Update process is a unique opportunity to connect with residents of Temecula and learn more about residents' values, priorities, concerns, and ideas. As part of the community outreach, a survey was conducted. The survey was available on the City's website from March 26 through September 30, 2020 and hard copies were also available around the community, including at the Senior Center. Advertisements were also placed in area laundromats. The City included a Housing Element article in 33,000 newsletters that were sent to each residence, had over 52,341 social media impressions, and sent over 10,000 emails to engage the public. Over 860 responses (provided online and in hard copy) were collected —a notable accomplishment given recent COVID-19-related public engagement challenges and a testament to Temecula's focus on outreach and community engagement. The survey was 16 questions long. The survey focuses on housing -related issues such as maintenance, affordability, home types, and living conditions in Temecula as well as demographic questions. This report is a summary of the responses received and the general themes that emerged. Appendix A includes a copy of the survey questions; specific questions are referenced throughout this report as relevant. Survey Respondent Demographics The survey contained 7 questions related to demographics. One of those questions included an opportunity for users to sign-up for more information about the Housing Element update process. The other 6 questions highlighted the following about the respondents: • Most respondents (42%) both lived and worked within the City. In total, approximately 86% of respondents live in Temecula, with only 13% working in the City but living elsewhere.' • Of those individuals who live in Temecula, approximately 58% have lived here for 10+ years. The next highest response (16%) was 5-10 years.Z • Most of the respondents own their home (71%), with 25% of respondents renting.3 • Most of the respondents (81%) live in single-family homes, with the next highest category being multi -family homes (12%).4 1 Question 1: Do you live and/or work in the City of Temecula? z Question 2: How long have you lived in the City of Temecula? s Question 6: Do you currently own or rent your home? 4 Question 8: Select the type of housing that best describes your current home. 3 • Of the respondents surveyed, the most common types of households include couples with children younger than 18 (33%), couples (25%), single -person households (11%), multi - generational households (10%) and single -parents household with children younger than 18 (6%). There was considerable range in household types including 6% (or 41 respondents), who were an unlisted household type including couples with adult children living with them, which could be a temporary phenomenon associated with the impacts of COVID-19 on housing patterns for young adults.' • The respondents represented a valid cross-section of the community's age profile; respondents were primarily 40-55 years old (36%), followed by 56-74 years old (30%), and 24-39 years old (26%).6 Survey Responses Executive Summary The survey responses reveal information about housing in Temecula. The results are grouped into 5 topical categories: values and priorities; housing affordability; housing maintenance; housing fit; and general feedback. In addition to looking at the survey results as a whole, this report also considers survey responses by demographic groups including how age, homeownership status, and household type influenced responses. VALUES AND PRIORITIES When respondents were asked, "Why have you chosen to live in Temecula,"' the most common answers were: • Safety of neighborhood (61%) • Affordability (52%) • Quality of local school system (49%) • Local recreational amenities and scenery (38%) • Proximity to shopping and services, including Old Town Temecula (33%) • Proximity to family and/or friends (32%) ' Question 9: Which of the following best describes your household type? 6 Question 11: What age range most accurately describes you? ' Question 5: Why have you chosen to live in Temecula? PI Figure 1: Why have you chosen to live in Temecula? Prox lm lty 28.80% jah,wt Quality ❑ 25 21% ho us i ng stac Lac recreational. Proximity t 31 95% family andlo. Affordability 51.58% Quality o 49AM localschoI) safety o 61 17% neighborhoa city servic 26 36% and pragra Prox i m ity t 33 24% shopping and.. Other (pleas 12.75% ecify sp D% 10% 20% KC° 4D% 50% 60% 70k 8C°k 9C°k 100't When responses are broken down further by demographic groups, the following differences occur: Respondents who own their own home vs. rent are far more likely to cite affordability as a factor (60%) than those who rent (33%). Similarly, quality of the housing stock is viewed more favorably by those who own (29%) than those who rent (17%), which may reflect the "pride of ownership" that comes with being able to maintain a property you own. There are also differences between respondents of different ages. Proximity to family and friends was far more important to those 75 years and older (42%) who may be less likely/able to travel long distances, than to those 23 years old or younger (29%) who are more mobile. However, quality of the local school system and safety of the neighborhood were far more important to those 23 years old and younger (71% for both indicators) who may be thinking about their own educational experiences or planning for the education of a child, than those 75 years old and older (9% and 33% respectively). There are also differences when it relates to household type. Couples with children under 18 ranked quality of school system (76%) and safety of neighborhood (76%) as their highest concern, while these issues were less important for single person households. Affordability was seen as a key issue across the board; it was ranked as the first or second highest issue in every household type except for young adults living with parents (where it fell to third). 0 When respondents were asked, "How important are the following concerns to you and your family?"' the following issues were identified as the most likely to be "very important": • Ensuring that children who grow up in Temecula can afford to live in Temecula (57%) • Encourage the rehabilitation of existing housing stock in older neighborhoods (49%) • Establish special needs housing for seniors, large families, veterans, and/or persons with disabilities (48%) • Ensure that the housing market in Temecula provides a diverse range of housing types, including single-family homes, townhomes, apartments, duplex/triplex and condominiums to meet the varied needs of local residents (48%) • Fair/Equitable Housing opportunities and programs to help maintain and secure neighborhoods that have suffered foreclosures (48%) • Establish programs to help at -risk homeowners keep their homes, including mortgage loan programs (47%) When responses are broken down further by demographic groups, the following differences occur: When it comes to comparisons of answers by age of respondents, there were some nuanced trends. Ensuring that children who grow up in Temecula can afford to live in Temecula was ranked highest by those 23 years old and younger (86%) and least important to those 75 years and older (39%); these trends represent the importance of affordability for young adults looking to move into their own home for the first time, versus the established housing choices of the community's older generation. Those aged 23 years old and younger felt extremely strongly (100%) about integrating affordable housing throughout the community to create mixed -income neighborhoods while only 28% of those 75 years and older felt that it was very important. Those 23 years old and younger also ranked "fair/equitable housing opportunities and programs to help maintain and secure neighborhoods that have suffered foreclosures" (86%) and "provide shelters and transitional housing for the homeless, along with services to help move people into permanent housing" as very important (71%). There were also differences in what mattered the most to homeowners versus those who rent. The issue of "ensuring that the housing market in Temecula provides a diverse range of housing types, including single-family homes, townhomes, apartments, duplex/triplex and condominiums to meet the varied needs of local residents," was far more important to those who rent (70%) than to those who own their own home (38%). Similarly, renters ranked the issue of, "integrate affordable housing throughout the community to create mixed -income neighborhoods," far higher (63%) than homeowners (25%). Likewise, renters placed higher value (61%) on the issue of "establish special needs housing for seniors, large families, veterans, and/or persons with disabilities," than did homeowners (42%). $ Question 12: How important are the following concerns to you and your family? 6 When it comes to household types, young adults living with parents and multi -generational households ranked "ensuring that children who grow up in Temecula can afford to live in Temecula," as much higher (74% and 71% respectively) that do single person households (36%). Multi -generational households also ranked "establish special needs housing for seniors, large families, veterans, and/or persons with disabilities," much higher (58%) than did couples with children under 18. However, for single parents with children under 18, the issue of "integrate affordable housing throughout the community to create mixed -income neighborhoods," ranks much higher (58%) than single person households (32%). HOUSING AFFORDABILITY When respondents were asked, "If you wish to own a home in Temecula but do not currently own one, what issues are preventing you from owning a home at this time?"9 the answers pointed to issues of affordability. The top 3 responses included: • 1 cannot find a home within my price range in Temecula (55%) • 1 do not currently have the financial resources for an appropriate down payment (52%) • 1 do not currently have the financial resources for an adequate monthly mortgage payment (33%) • Potential answers related to housing stock diversity or housing quality were not heavily selected, indicating that if people were able to overcome the financial obstacles, the housing choices available in Temecula are generally desirable. 9 Question 7: If you wish to own a home in Temecula but do not currently own one, what issues are preventing you from owning a home at this time? V� Figure 2: If you wish to own a home in Temecula but do not currently own one, what issues are preventing you from owning a home at this time? No home 55.44% 1 within price.. No harnes tha� 12.98?c suit my need 6o not ha_•e a 51.5B% down payi-, 6o not have 32 % enough for,,, No homes tha0 7.02% fit quality, do not wis17.54% m to own or re.. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 6D% 7G% BD% 9a% 10D% When responses are broken down further by demographic groups, the following differences occur: When it comes to differences between respondents of different age groups, Millennials (age 24-39) had the highest financial barriers: 71% say there are no homes within their desired price range; 64% do not have a down payment; and 46% do not have enough for a mortgage payment. When it comes to household type, couples with children under 18 had the most significant financial constraints, with 75% responding that there were no homes within their price range, and 55% reporting that did not have enough for a down payment. 1:to] II►II1Offid"TA N aM." ► 40 When respondents were asked, "Which of the following housing upgrades or expansions have you considered making to your home?s10 the top responses included: • Painting (42%) • Solar (28%) • HVAC (22%) io Question 3: Which of the following housing upgrades or expansions have you considered making to your home? 8 Figure 3: Which of the following housing upgrades or expansions have you considered making on your home? Room additiol 1 11.2 Roofing M 12.52% HVA1' 22.42% Painting 41.92% Solar 27.66% Accessory 8.739E Dwelling Unit Does not appl 33.92% Other [Pleas 14.9990 specify 0% 10% 21G% 30% 40 Rt `_()% 60% 73% 80% 90% 1OM While a large proportion of respondents indicated 1 or more improvements, over a third stated that this question does not apply, meaning that they are not considering any upgrades or expansions at this time. Not surprisingly, this question applied more to homeowners than renters. However, while 80% of renters responded, "Does not apply," the other 20% indicated that there were minor improvements including painting (10%) that occupants have considered making. When it comes to comparing respondents based on age, respondents age 40-55 had the longest list of upgrades and expansions they were considering including room additions (15%), roofing (12%), and accessory dwelling units (11%). Respondents were also allowed to provide specific feedback regarding other (non -listed) types of improvements they were interested in pursuing. The most popular write-in responses include: • New windows • New flooring • Pool construction • Upgraded landscaping • Kitchen renovation • Patio cover installation • Garage improvements P] When asked, "How would you rate the physical condition of the residence you live in?" respondents stated that their home: • Shows signs of minor deferred maintenance (i.e., peeling paint, chipped stucco, etc.) (46%) • Excellent condition (33%) • Needs 1 or more modest rehabilitation improvements (i.e., new roof, new wood siding, etc.) (13%) • Needs 1 or more major upgrades (i.e., new foundation, new plumbing, new electrical, etc.) (5%) Figure 4: How would you rate the physical condition of the residence you live in? condition 33.24% 4A Shows signs o 46.42% deferred... Needs modest 1261% rehabilitati... Needs major 5.01% upgrades [iA other [pleas 272% SPA p ECIf}� 0% 1D% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% SON 90% I&D% Homeowners were more likely than renters to rate the physical condition of their residence as excellent (40% as opposed to 16%). Single parents with children under 18 (17%), young adults living with parents (17%), and single persons living with roommates (20%) were the 2 household groups least likely to rate their housing condition as excellent. Respondents ages 75 and older were the age group most likely to rate their housing quality as excellent. 10 HOUSING FIT When asked, "How satisfied are you with your current housing situation?"" the top responses were: • 1 am very satisfied (48%) • 1 am somewhat satisfied (35%) • 1 am somewhat dissatisfied (10%) • 1 am dissatisfied (6%) There were significant differences in responses, however, between homeowners and renters. 61% of homeowners were "very satisfied" as opposed to only 15% of renters. Single parents with children under the age of 18 showed the highest levels of dissatisfaction with a 20% stating, "I am very dissatisfied," and 17% stating, "I am very satisfied." Only 14% of respondents age 23 and younger were very satisfied with their housing situation, as opposed to 61% of those 75 years old and older. When asked, "Do you feel that the different housing types in Temecula currently meet your housing needs?s12 respondents answered: • Yes (65%) • No (35%) Figure 5: Do you feel that the different housing types in Temecula currently meet your housing needs? No 35J6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 80% 70% 80% 90% 100% 11 Question 10: How satisfied are you with your current housing situation? 12 Question 13: Do you feel that the different housing types in Temecula currently meet your housing needs? 11 However, the breakdown along homeownerships lines were different with 77% of homeowners answering "Yes", as opposed to 40% of renters. The contrast was even more stark along household type comparisons. 63% of single parents with children under age 18 answered, "no" with the next lowest score being single persons living with roommates (56%). Those on the opposite end of the scale for age, had nearly opposite reactions. For those age 23 and younger, 71% said that Temecula did not meet their housing needs as opposed to 81% of those 75 years old and older who stated that it did meet their housing needs. When asked, "What types of housing are most needed in the City of Temecula?"13 respondents answered: • Single family detached (49%) • Senior Housing (34%) • Condominiums (multifamily ownership homes) (24%) • Other (24%) • Duplex/Attached Housing (20%) Figure 6: What types of housing are most needed in the City of Temecula? Single Family 4910% (Detached) DuplexjAttach20.3345 Housin ['.andaminiums (multifamily — Apartment Apartment 13.4,0% [multifamily.. Senior Mousin 33.73% Accessory 10.39%6 Dwel l i ng U n it Housing f.M 12.65% people with.. Other [pleas 23.950-/a specify 0% 10% 20% 3D% 40% SM CG% 7G% BG% 90% 10046 13 Question 14: What types of housing are most needed in the City of Temecula? 12 The household group most interested in more single-family homes are adult head of households (non - parents) with children under age 18 (75%) and the least interested in more single-family housing are single persons with roommates (22%). When it comes to age comparisons, Millennials are most interested in more single-family homes (61%) as opposed to seniors 75 years old and older (27%). A significant percentage of the respondents indicated that "other" (non -listed) types of housing options are needed in Temecula. Respondents provided a range of specific answers, many of which were already identified as an answer choice (i.e., senior housing, housing for persons with disabilities). Moreover, many respondents used this opportunity to indicate that they did not support new development of any type, generally due to concerns related to traffic, safety, and access to public facilities and infrastructure. Of those "other" types of housing identified in the individual responses, which were not already listed as a possible answer, the responses generally included: • Housing options affordable to people with lower incomes • Multigenerational homes • Permanent supportive housing • Mixed use development • Housing options specific to the needs of single parents • Single -story homes At the conclusion of the survey, respondents could provide general feedback on topics not addressed in earlier questions. As expected, general feedback received was varied in tone and content. Written responses were divided but fell into 2 general categories. Group A: Those who feel that Temecula is unaffordable and housing prices are too high across the board. These individuals suggested building more affordable housing of all types (from single family homes to multi -family housing) as well as taking care of seniors and the homeless. Some sample responses include: "The cost of rent here does not match the income that many of us have forcing many to struggle, have roommates, constantly move etc. More affordable housing that matches the jobs available that only want to pay $17 or less would help out a great deal so people can afford to live without roommates and without struggling to pay everything." 13 "Just want affordable housing for all income types. It would reduce homelessness and bring diversity to the city." Group B: Those who moved to Temecula for its affordability and safety, and feel that it has changed in a negative way over the years. These individuals are worried about continued impacts on congestion and lack of infrastructure. They want the City to focus on improving current conditions and adding more infrastructure (such as improved roadway conditions) instead of building additional housing. Some sample responses include: "It is disappointing to see zonings changed and other adjustments that are aimed to please the person(s) financially benefitting rather than thinking about the value in the original zoning as well as congestion and overloading the market." "Too much growth without infrastructure to support. Roads/traffic too heavy and maintenance not adequate to support the additional homes being built." "Temecula is overcrowded. Way too many apartments and condos. The city council was going the right direction with making it more of a destination or tourist town but now they want to ruin the natural beauty with more housing. There are areas north of Menifee that can take more housing and where new infrastructure can be built. Temecula is maxed out." Other issues that were raised include: • Making the process of building an accessory dwelling unit easier • Increasing the number and availability of bike and walking trails • Keeping water usage for landscaping low • Preserving open space and views of the mountains • Focusing on Temecula as a tourist destination • Address issues of housing discrimination and diversity Appendix A: Survey A-1 The City is in the process of updating the Housing Element of the General Plan for the 2021-2029 period as required by State law. The Housing Element establishes policies and programs to address Temecula's existing and projected housing needs, including the City's "fair share" of the regional housing need (or "RHNA"). If you live or work in the City of Temecula, please complete the following short survey to provide us with your input. Survey limited to one per household. 1. Do you live and/or work in the City of Temecula? 0 1 live in Temecula but work somewhere else 0 1 work in Temecula but live somewhere else 0 1 live and work in Temecula 0 1 live in Temecula and do not currently work/I am retired If you live somewhere other than the City of Temecula, where do you live? I 2. If you live in Temecula, how long have you lived in the City? (LJ 0-2 Years 0 2-5 Years 0 5-10 Years O10 + Years 3. If you are employed outside of your home, approximately how long is your one-way commute to work? ULess than 5 miles 0 5-10 miles 0 10-25 miles 25-40 miles OMore than 40 miles 4. Select the type of housing that best describes your current home: O Single Family Home (Detached) O Duplex/Attached Home O Multifamily Home (Apartment/Condominium) OOther (Guesthouse, Mobile Home, etc.) 1 5. Do you currently own or rent your home? OOwn O Rent 6. Are you satisfied with your current housing situation? OYes O No O Other (please specify) E:� 7. How would you rate the physical condition of the unit you live in? OExcellent condition Shows signs of minor deferred maintenance (i.e., peeling paint, chipped stucco, etc.) ONeeds one or more modest rehabilitation improvements (i.e., new roof, new wood siding, etc.) n Needs one or more major upgrades (i.e., new foundation, new plumbing, new electrical, etc.) C Other (please specify) 8. Do you think that the range of housing options currently available in the City of Temecula meet your needs? Yes No 9. What types of housing are most needed in the City of Temecula? U Single Family (Detached) Duplex/Attached Housing Condominiums (multifamily ownership homes) Apartments (multifamily rental homes) Senior Housing Housing for persons with disabilities Other (please specify) F IN 10. If you live in the City of Temecula, why have you chosen to live in the City? (Select all that apply) ❑ Proximity to job/work Quality of housing stock Local recreational amenities and scenery ❑ Proximity to family and/or friends ❑ Affordability ❑ Quality of local school system ❑ Safety of neighborhood ❑ City services and programs ❑ Proximity to shopping and services, including Old Town Temecula ❑ I do not live in Temecula Other (please specify) 11. If you wish to own a home in Temecula but do not currently own one, what issues are preventing you from owning a home at this time? (Choose all that apply) u I cannot find a home within my target price range in Temecula I cannot find a home that suits my living needs in Temecula (housing size, disability accommodations) 1-1 1 do not currently have the financial resources for an appropriate down payment I do not currently have the financial resources for an adequate monthly mortgage payment I cannot currently find a home that suits my quality standards in Temecula I do not currently wish to own a home in Temecula 12. How important are the following concerns to you and your family? Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important Don't Know Ensuring that children who grow up in Temecula can afford to live in Temecula. Create mixed -use (commercial/office and residential) projects in the community that O O encourage walkable neighborhoods and reduce dependency on automobiles. 3 Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important Don't Know Ensure that the housing market in Temecula provides a diverse range of housing types, including single-family 1 homes, townhomes, �J apartments, and condominiums to meet the varied needs of local residents. Establish special needs housing for seniors, n 0 large families, and/or U persons with disabilities. Integrate affordable housing throughout the community to create O O O mixed -income neighborhoods. Encourage energy conservation through O O O site and building design. Provide shelters and transitional housing for the homeless, along with O O 0 u services to help move people into permanent housing. Encourage the rehabilitation of existing U 0 u housing stock in older neighborhoods. Establish programs to help at -risk homeowners keep their homes, including mortgage loan programs. Fair/Equitable 0 Housing opportunities and programs to help maintain and secure neighborhoods that have suffered foreclosures. 13. What age range most accurately describes you? O 18-21 years old O 22-30 years old O 31-40 years old O 41-50 years old O50 + years old 14. Are there any comments you would like to share with the City of Temecula relevant to the upcoming Housing Element Update? 15. Please leave your name and email address to receive updates and information on the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update. Name: Email: 1 Appendix B: Summary of All Survey Responses City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q1 Do you live and/or work in the City of Temecula? Answered:772 Skipped:90 Live ine 23.96% Temecula Work in Temecula M 13.47% Live AND work in Temecula Retired in Temecul 0% 10% ANSWER CHOICES Live in Temecula Work in Temecula Live AND work in Temecula Retired in Temecula TOTAL 42.49% 20.08% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% RESPONSES 23.96% 13.47% 42.49% 20.08% 185 104 328 155 772 1/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 IF YOU LIVE SOMEWHERE OTHER THAN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, WHERE DO YOU DATE LIVE? Menifee 9/24/2020 1:30 PM Murrieta 9/17/2020 5:08 PM Menifee 9/16/2020 8:11 PM Murrieta 9/16/2020 9:32 AM Murrieta 9/16/2020 9:21 AM unincorporated county/retired 9/16/2020 9:10 AM Hemet 9/16/2020 9:07 AM Murrieta 9/15/2020 2:08 PM Murrieta 9/15/2020 11:43 AM Murrieta 9/15/2020 11:29 AM Murrieta 9/14/2020 11:39 AM Murrieta 9/9/2020 3:41 PM Murrieta 9/9/2020 10:25 AM I live and work in Murrieta 9/8/2020 10:46 AM Menifee 9/7/2020 7:53 PM Lake Elsinore 9/7/2020 4:10 PM San Diego own two rentals in Temecula 9/5/2020 3:28 PM Wildomar 9/5/2020 11:44 AM Canyon Lake 9/5/2020 11:28 AM Sage 9/5/2020 9:44 AM Murrieta (County land, not city) Temecula Schools 9/5/2020 6:19 AM Caldwell, Texas 9/4/2020 8:12 PM Murrieta 9/4/2020 7:56 PM Menifee 9/4/2020 6:01 PM Menifee 9/4/2020 5:37 PM Menifee 9/4/2020 4:56 PM Canyon Lake 9/4/2020 4:50 PM Murrieta 9/4/2020 4:41 PM MURRIETA 9/4/2020 4:06 PM Oceanside 9/4/2020 3:55 PM Perris 9/4/2020 3:52 PM hemet 9/4/2020 3:44 PM I live in Canyon Lake but do some business in Temecula 9/4/2020 3:37 PM Winchester 9/4/2020 3:35 PM Wildomar 9/4/2020 3:33 PM Hemet 9/4/2020 3:24 PM Menifee 9/4/2020 3:23 PM 2/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey French Valley 9/4/2020 3:22 PM Murrieta 9/4/2020 3:22 PM Menifee 9/4/2020 3:20 PM Menifee 9/4/2020 3:17 PM Murrieta 9/4/2020 3:16 PM Menifee 9/4/2020 3:14 PM wildomar 9/4/2020 3:12 PM Sage 9/4/2020 3:08 PM Murrieta 9/4/2020 3:06 PM Murrieta 9/4/2020 3:05 PM Murrieta 9/4/2020 3:05 PM Menifee 9/4/2020 3:02 PM Wildomar 9/3/2020 2:31 PM Hemet 9/3/2020 7:15 AM Hemet 9/2/2020 6:08 AM Murrieta 9/1/2020 10:14 AM Winchester 8/31/2020 6:22 PM Hemet 8/31/2020 8:14 AM Winchester, CA 8/31/2020 7:31 AM Wildomar 8/31/2020 12:13 AM Murrieta 8/29/2020 11:57 PM Rancho cucamonga 8/29/2020 5:21 PM Moreno Valley 8/29/2020 2:11 PM Menifee 8/29/2020 11:03 AM Fallbrook 8/29/2020 9:10 AM Murrieta 8/29/2020 8:27 AM Wildomar 8/29/2020 7:33 AM Hemet 8/29/2020 7:23 AM Canyon Lake 8/29/2020 6:51 AM Temecula wine country 8/28/2020 9:40 PM Outside of wine country Winchester 8/28/2020 9:35 PM Temecula in Wine County 8/28/2020 9:32 PM Sun City 8/28/2020 8:21 PM San Jacinto 8/28/2020 7:08 PM Unincorporated Riverside county 8/28/2020 6:57 PM Menifee 8/28/2020 6:36 PM Murrieta 8/28/2020 6:04 PM Murrieta 8/28/2020 5:47 PM 3/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 76 Riverside 8/28/2020 5:26 PM 77 Los angeles 8/28/2020 3:52 PM 78 Winchester 8/28/2020 2:32 PM 79 Menifee 8/28/2020 2:24 PM 80 Murrieta 8/28/2020 2:15 PM 81 1 live in the Wine Country unincorporated area 8/28/2020 1:58 PM 82 Menifee 8/28/2020 1:56 PM 83 Sun City 8/28/2020 1:54 PM 84 Menifee 8/28/2020 1:50 PM 85 Murrieta 8/28/2020 1:44 PM 86 1 am filling this out for my parents who are retired. 8/28/2020 1:43 PM 87 Aguanga 8/28/2020 1:39 PM 88 Perris 8/28/2020 1:31 PM 89 Menifee. I am always down in Temecula, originally wanted to live there. 8/28/2020 1:29 PM 90 Menifee 8/28/2020 1:28 PM 91 1 live in the city of Perris 8/28/2020 1:24 PM 92 28500 Pujol Street #44 8/28/2020 1:19 PM 93 Menifee 8/28/2020 1:14 PM 94 Lake Elsinore 8/28/2020 1:13 PM 95 Lake Elsinore 8/28/2020 1:13 PM 96 Menifee 8/28/2020 1:13 PM 97 Murrieta 8/28/2020 1:12 PM 98 1 would like to move to the city of Temecula 8/28/2020 1:08 PM 99 Murrieta 8/28/2020 1:07 PM 100 fallbrook 8/28/2020 1:06 PM 101 Winchester/French Valley 8/28/2020 5:57 AM 102 Murrieta 8/25/2020 9:15 AM 103 Escondido 8/24/2020 6:56 PM 104 Warner Springs 8/24/2020 5:25 PM 105 Murrieta 8/24/2020 1:09 PM 106 City of Riverside 8/24/2020 12:48 PM 107 Menifee 8/24/2020 12:02 PM 108 Menifee 8/24/2020 11:57 AM 109 San Diego 8/22/2020 6:56 AM 110 Riverside. (Formerly Temecula) 8/21/2020 9:57 PM 111 Murrieta 8/21/2020 7:26 AM 112 Murrieta 8/19/2020 8:31 AM 113 Murrieta 8/18/2020 2:37 PM 4/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 114 Hemet, ca 8/18/2020 1:09 PM 115 Murrieta 8/17/2020 8:17 PM 116 Murrieta 8/17/2020 1:54 PM 117 French Valley 8/17/2020 11:06 AM 118 Menifee, CA 8/17/2020 10:53 AM 119 Murrieta 8/14/2020 6:23 PM 120 Murrieta 8/14/2020 9:52 AM 121 Murrieta 8/13/2020 5:48 PM 122 Riverside 8/12/2020 3:19 PM 123 We just moved away 8/12/2020 9:17 AM 124 Wildomar 8/12/2020 9:14 AM 125 French valley 8/12/2020 8:39 AM 126 Murrieta 8/11/2020 7:47 PM 127 Murrieta 8/11/2020 5:01 PM 128 Murrieta 8/11/2020 2:17 PM 129 Winchester 8/11/2020 2:15 PM 130 Murrieta 8/11/2020 2:00 PM 131 Temecula Wine Country Area 8/11/2020 1:28 PM 132 Riverside 8/10/2020 3:29 PM 133 Corona 8/10/2020 2:27 PM 134 Wildomar 8/10/2020 2:15 PM 135 Homeland 8/10/2020 2:14 PM 136 Murrieta 8/10/2020 7:15 AM 137 Wine Country 8/8/2020 11:25 PM 138 Lived in Temecula for years and may move back -have many friends there so my info is 8/7/2020 4:40 AM relevant. 139 Fallbrook 8/6/2020 11:42 PM 140 Winchester, CA 8/6/2020 8:43 AM 141 1 live in Temecula, partly telecommute and partly work within 40 minutes of here 8/5/2020 8:46 PM 142 Murrieta 8/5/2020 2:38 PM 143 Murrieta 8/5/2020 11:09 AM 144 Murrieta 8/4/2020 7:43 AM 145 Winchester 8/4/2020 7:37 AM 146 Wildomar 8/4/2020 6:36 AM 147 Murrieta 8/4/2020 12:57 AM 148 Murrieta 8/3/2020 7:40 PM 149 Lake Elsinore 8/3/2020 6:13 PM 150 TEMECUTA WINE COUNTRY 8/3/2020 4:31 PM 151 Riverside 8/3/2020 4:07 PM 5/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 152 Murrieta 8/2/2020 5:31 PM 153 Murrieta 8/2/2020 2:47 PM 154 Murrieta 8/2/2020 2:06 PM 155 Wildomar 8/2/2020 12:38 PM 156 San Juan Capistrano 8/2/2020 11:05 AM 157 Murrieta 8/2/2020 10:48 AM 158 Wildomar 8/2/2020 10:09 AM 159 Menifee 8/2/2020 8:46 AM 160 Menifee 8/1/2020 6:50 AM 161 Bonsall 7/31/2020 9:31 PM 162 Meadowview 7/31/2020 2:10 PM 163 Just outside of city limits toward wine country 7/31/2020 7:56 AM 164 French Valley 7/30/2020 10:29 PM 165 Menifee 7/30/2020 8:34 PM 166 Santee 7/30/2020 7:52 PM 167 Murrieta 7/30/2020 6:05 PM 168 Menifee 7/30/2020 6:03 PM 169 Murrieta 7/30/2020 5:49 PM 170 Lake elsinore 7/30/2020 5:46 PM 171 Perris 7/30/2020 5:32 PM 172 Near Pachanga 7/30/2020 5:19 PM 173 Menifee 7/30/2020 5:11 PM 174 Riverside County -Wine Country 7/30/2020 2:32 PM 175 1 am in the process is moving to Temecula from San Diego 7/30/2020 1:08 PM 176 Santa Clara 7/29/2020 1:55 PM 177 Murrieta 6/16/2020 4:03 PM 178 Anza 5/18/2020 8:46 AM 179 Murrieta 4/14/2020 3:28 PM 6/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q2 How long have you lived in the City of Temecula? Answered:695 Skipped:167 0-2 Years 12.37% 2-5 Years!1 13.53% 5-10 Years 10 + Years 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 0-2 Years 12.37% 86 2-5 Years 13.53% 94 5-10 Years 16.26% 113 10 + Years 57.84% 402 TOTAL 695 7/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q3 Which of the following housing upgrades or expansions have you considered making on your home? Answered:68-1 Skipped:175 Room additio 11.21% Roofing - 12.52% HVAC 22.42% Painting V 41.92% Solar 27.66% Accessory 8 73% Dwelling Unit Does not apply 33.92% Other (please 14.99% specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Room addition 11.21% 77 Roofing 12.52% 86 H VAC 22.42% 154 Painting 41.92% 288 Solar 27.66% 190 Accessory Dwelling Unit 8.73% 60 Does not apply. 33.92% 233 Other (please specify) 14.99% 103 Total Respondents: 687 8/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE Additional studio/kitchenette 9/28/2020 4:23 PM Flooring 9/24/2020 6:56 PM Lawn upgrade to drought tolerant rock 9/19/2020 12:13 PM Flooring, plumbing, electrical 9/16/2020 9:27 AM I'm renting 9/16/2020 9:13 AM Flooring, plumbing, electrical 9/16/2020 8:56 AM new flooring, landscaping 9/15/2020 10:18 AM repair support beam in garage 9/15/2020 9:58 AM Kitchen and bathroom upgrades replace fencing 9/6/2020 2:54 PM LANDSCAPING.. plumbing, windows etc.. 9/5/2020 1:03 PM all ready done 9/5/2020 8:46 AM Whole house fan in the attic 9/5/2020 7:08 AM Pool 9/4/2020 3:41 PM Kitchen, bath, landscaping 9/4/2020 3:30 PM Flooring 9/4/2020 3:25 PM pool 9/4/2020 3:05 PM Whole house fan 8/31/2020 4:27 PM Installation and soundproofing 8/31/2020 1:12 PM Pool 8/31/2020 11:09 AM Tankless water heater & new windows 8/30/2020 10:34 PM Windows. Interior doors. 8/30/2020 9:53 PM Windows 8/30/2020 4:15 PM Windows 8/30/2020 2:53 PM Upgrading bathrooms 8/30/2020 8:44 AM Water heater 8/29/2020 8:41 PM Pool 8/29/2020 4:44 PM Fencing 8/29/2020 2:54 PM Renovate/upgrade 8/29/2020 9:00 AM Windows and kitchen 8/29/2020 12:22 AM Driveway 8/28/2020 9:34 PM Shelves in the kitchen 8/28/2020 8:25 PM Energy efficient appliances 8/28/2020 7:31 PM Pool equipment, plumbing, appliances. 8/28/2020 6:40 PM Landscaping 8/28/2020 6:07 PM New flooring and upgraded bathrooms 8/28/2020 5:50 PM Major Interior Remodel 8/28/2020 3:05 PM Did an addition considering others. 8/28/2020 1:53 PM 9/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 Air purifier systems 8/28/2020 1:52 PM Making the stairs from the front and back door a ramp. 8/28/2020 1:46 PM All of the above have been done during my time here 8/28/2020 1:40 PM Looking to purchase in temecula 8/28/2020 1:29 PM Renting but want solar on MF affordable housing Riverbank with SOMAH program 8/28/2020 1:21 PM Tree removal/ service 8/28/2020 2:28 AM Remodel interior 8/27/2020 7:13 PM Water Heater, bathroom remodel, new floors 8/27/2020 5:54 PM A bunch of stuff 8/27/2020 1:52 PM Cracks on walls 8/26/2020 7:59 PM Kitchen and bathroom remodel, carpet and other flooring 8/26/2020 6:05 PM Buying 8/25/2020 7:21 AM I would like to see aprtment complexes have Solar. I would like to see Temecula stop building 8/24/2020 5:11 PM anything further. Kitchen upgrade 8/24/2020 10:05 AM Updating our whole home 8/21/2020 1:06 PM rain gutter, patio cover and land scaping 8/21/2020 11:46 AM New flooring and kitchen renewal 8/19/2020 1:35 PM Remodeling staircase 8/19/2020 12:05 PM flooring 8/19/2020 9:55 AM I also need to be able to rent two of my rooms out to people here on vacation to help me pay 8/19/2020 9:29 AM for my mortgage. I'm a single mom, but I can't do that right now because the city stopped letting us I currently rent, so no additions. 8/18/2020 1:38 PM pool & landscaping 8/17/2020 11:07 AM bathroom remodel, whole house fan 8/15/2020 12:51 AM Interior Remodeling of Bathrooms/ Upgrade Floors 8/12/2020 4:29 PM Pool 8/11/2020 3:52 PM Patio cover 8/10/2020 10:59 AM Remodel kitchen 8/9/2020 6:39 AM Add another garage 8/8/2020 6:30 PM Kitchen remodel 8/8/2020 3:09 PM Pool 8/7/2020 2:18 PM Want single story. 8/6/2020 9:56 PM interior remodeling 8/6/2020 5:18 PM New windows. 8/6/2020 4:21 PM Garage 8/5/2020 9:44 PM Pool remodel 8/5/2020 12:05 PM Interior remodel 8/5/2020 10:51 AM Garage door replacement/garage reno 8/5/2020 10:43 AM 10/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 75 Windows, doors 8/4/2020 12:50 AM 76 Windows 8/3/2020 10:06 PM 77 Pool/spa 8/3/2020 6:17 PM 78 Kitchen and bathroom upgrades 8/3/2020 5:52 PM 79 Pool 8/3/2020 4:17 PM 80 Kitchen remodel 8/3/2020 2:42 PM 81 New flooring and countertops 8/3/2020 1:56 PM 82 Pool 8/3/2020 1:21 PM 83 Full renovations 8/2/2020 5:23 PM 84 pool; remodel; flooring 8/2/2020 5:16 PM 85 Bathroom remodel 8/2/2020 11:07 AM 86 Moving to Temecula 8/1/2020 6:52 AM 87 Downsize 7/31/2020 5:48 PM 88 Pool 7/31/2020 5:17 PM 89 Bathroom upgrades 7/31/2020 3:32 PM 90 Driveway expansion 7/31/2020 2:05 PM 91 Patio Cover 7/31/2020 8:54 AM 92 General interior updates due to age of home 7/31/2020 6:39 AM 93 Kitchen and bathroom renovations 7/31/2020 1:13 AM 94 Pool 7/30/2020 10:47 PM 95 Bathtub install downstairs 7/30/2020 9:31 PM 96 1 Rent. It's not affordable for me to buy here although I work and live this community 7/30/2020 9:07 PM 97 Kitchen & bathroom renovation 7/30/2020 8:09 PM 98 Pool and landscaping. 7/30/2020 5:23 PM 99 I'm a renter. Would love to own. 7/30/2020 2:32 PM 100 None 7/30/2020 1:21 PM 101 Patio cover 7/30/2020 1:18 PM 102 Flooring, window coverings, patio cover 6/8/2020 11:14 AM 103 General replacement of outdated aspects of our home 6/2/2020 4:38 PM 11/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q4 How would you rate the physical condition of the residence you live in? Answered:698 Skipped:164 Excellent 0 condition 33.24% Shows sign defern Needs mo rehabilit Needs m upgrades Other (pl specify) 2.72% 46.42% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES Excellent condition Shows signs of deferred maintenance (i.e., peeling paint, chipped stucco, etc.) Needs modest rehabilitation improvements (i.e., new roof, new wood siding, etc.) Needs major upgrades (i.e., new foundation, new plumbing, new electrical, etc.) Other (please specify) TOTAL RESPONSES 33.24% 232 46.42% 324 12.61% 88 5.01% 35 2.72% 19 698 12/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) Good condition- well maintained Good condition for a 20+ year old Apartment I rent an apartment Need pest control. Found 2 big dead rat. Fencing I live in an apartment Doesnt apply Excellent for a 32 year old tract home. The aprtment I visit in Temecula is way too small and way pricey. Remodlers need to come in and make to or three apartment into one. Then, they need to take your over 50 empty commercial buildings and make them into apartment for the homeless An apt. So maintenance is done by management. Renting at the moment fence is falling down, hasn't been painted since 1998 so the wood trim is falling apart Apartment in good condition, but aging House was well kept modern Inside needs upgrades Decent Not currently living in Temecula do not live here DATE 9/16/2020 9:11 AM 9/6/2020 2:54 PM 9/3/2020 6:12 PM 8/29/2020 11:58 PM 8/28/2020 8:25 PM 8/28/2020 3:45 PM 8/28/2020 1:40 PM 8/28/2020 1:09 PM 8/26/2020 6:52 PM 8/24/2020 5:11 PM 8/19/2020 10:58 PM 8/19/2020 11:32 AM 8/19/2020 9:29 AM 8/12/2020 10:57 AM 8/12/2020 9:19 AM 8/8/2020 3:09 PM 7/30/2020 9:07 PM 7/30/2020 1:09 PM 7/29/2020 1:57 PM 13/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q5 Why have you chosen to live in Temecula? (Select all that apply) Answered:698 Skipped:164 Proximity tc job/wort Quality o housing stoc Loc, recreational. Proximity tc family and/o.. Afford Quality local schoo Safety o neighborhooi City service. and program Proximity tc shopping and.. Other (pleas ' 28.80% 25.21% 37.54% 31.95% hN51.58% 49.43% PF61.17% I26.36% "M 33.24% 12.75% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES Proximity to job/work Quality of housing stock Local recreational amenities and scenery Proximity to family and/or friends Affordability Quality of local school system Safety of neighborhood City services and programs Proximity to shopping and services, including Old Town Temecula Other (please specify) Total Respondents: 698 RESPONSES 28.80% 201 25.21% 176 37.54% 262 31.95% 223 51.58% 360 49.43% 345 61.17% 427 26.36% 184 33.24% 232 12.75% 89 14/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE wine country and balloon views 9/24/2020 4:43 PM Charter Schools with Academy Based Learning 9/24/2020 11:09 AM Family 9/16/2020 9:37 AM For retirement 9/16/2020 9:32 AM The weather 9/16/2020 9:28 AM Retirement 9/16/2020 9:21 AM moved to area for schools/ affordable living 9/16/2020 9:11 AM No comment 9/16/2020 9:05 AM The weather 9/16/2020 9:03 AM moved here 30 years ago-- too crowded now. Looking to move away. 9/15/2020 12:02 PM live with family 9/15/2020 11:57 AM Close to my daughter 9/15/2020 11:45 AM I came to CA to take care of my mother and wanted SoCal because of the weather. 9/15/2020 10:18 AM love this town.... especially the city employees and cops 9/5/2020 1:03 PM herh scince 1977 9/5/2020 8:46 AM Wine Country 9/5/2020 6:58 AM Lived here 32 years its a great place to live. 9/4/2020 5:09 PM Wineries 9/4/2020 3:41 PM I don't live in Temecula 9/4/2020 3:34 PM 10 years ago it was more affordable however now it is not so much 9/4/2020 3:30 PM My husband lives here 9/4/2020 3:15 PM Ive live here for almost 50 years. 9/4/2020 3:05 PM Weather 8/31/2020 1:12 PM Divine direction 8/31/2020 12:15 AM School Ratings 8/30/2020 4:15 PM Not too crowded 8/30/2020 12:12 PM We love Temecula 8/29/2020 9:11 AM Quality of living, somewhat peaceful but beginning to show signs of the demise of peaceful 8/29/2020 8:43 AM existence... building more dwellings BEFORE making roads to handle the traffic you're bringing in Purchased property in 1977 built a home 8/28/2020 9:37 PM work close by 8/28/2020 6:37 PM Good Air Quality 8/28/2020 6:17 PM i do not live in Temecula, but have in the past 8/28/2020 1:58 PM Gated communities 8/28/2020 1:52 PM Settled in 1977 working in the fields 8/28/2020 1:46 PM Moved to help sister when she purchased a home in 1990 8/27/2020 7:13 PM E 8/27/2020 5:44 AM 15/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Moved here 32 years ago for a safe, family environment. 8/26/2020 6:52 PM Came for the job, stayed for the city! 8/26/2020 6:24 PM Family 8/25/2020 12:23 AM I live in Multiple Sites in South Western Riverside County. I want this over building and Traffic 8/24/2020 5:11 PM to stop now. With the hope of new City Council People we can No Growth. Repari what we have. Temecula has a 3 Billion Dollar Revenu and it needs to go to the structures that are already here and need solar and water efficiency The number one reason we chose to live in Temecula is safety and beauty of the area 8/23/2020 5:40 PM family friendly 8/22/2020 7:22 PM Cost of living 8/21/2020 4:58 PM Quality of life. 8/21/2020 1:59 PM We fell in Love with the city 31 years ago and decided to live here and be close to our family 8/21/2020 1:06 PM that retired here Economy... covid... living with parents 8/21/2020 12:06 PM More open space / less crowded than San Diego and LA 8/21/2020 8:19 AM City values 8/21/2020 5:17 AM Kids 8/19/2020 10:30 PM 1994 affordability 8/19/2020 9:50 PM Friendly HOA and neighbors 8/19/2020 1:35 PM Centralized area 8/19/2020 11:44 AM Job 8/19/2020 10:11 AM small-town feel yet has all we need 8/19/2020 9:55 AM Safest city and school ratings. Pricing goes up every year which sucks 8/19/2020 9:46 AM I moved here because its the only place I could afford to buy a home to raise my 3 children in 8/19/2020 9:29 AM as a single mother Moved from out of state and chose family friendly area 8/18/2020 8:16 PM I didn't have a choice. I had to move in with family. 8/18/2020 4:12 PM Its barely affordable but more so than San diego. 8/17/2020 9:52 PM Proximity to church/school 8/17/2020 7:58 AM Conservative/Republican politicians and people 8/15/2020 12:51 AM Our church in Temecula 8/13/2020 11:56 PM Overall quality of life 8/12/2020 4:29 PM Originally came For those reasons, but we recently sold and left because of the homeless and 8/12/2020 9:19 AM other issues that are now playing in the city. Wineries 8/11/2020 9:12 PM Temecula Hospital, Wine Country, Diverse Community 8/7/2020 2:18 PM Move back to childhood home 8/7/2020 1:14 PM Good city leadership, spending priorities, and quality of life 8/6/2020 5:18 PM Used to be affordability but that seems to be evening out a little with other counties 8/6/2020 11:25 AM Beautiful weather year round 8/5/2020 9:51 AM N/A 8/3/2020 11:19 PM 16/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 Everything 8/3/2020 8:11 PM We were tired of living in the Bay Area 8/3/2020 2:42 PM Beauty of city 8/2/2020 2:07 PM Retired here because we had built-in friendships, we knew for years, relating to wine makers. 8/2/2020 10:38 AM Because I have for 30+ years 7/31/2020 2:35 PM Family oriented city. 7/31/2020 11:46 AM Moved here before all the building so for small town 7/30/2020 8:49 PM Moved here 40 years ago to get away from the cream of the crud 7/30/2020 7:17 PM Moved here over 20+ years ago because it was cheaper 7/30/2020 7:15 PM Moved here when it was affordable and schools were good. 7/30/2020 6:06 PM Easy drive to the beach. 7/30/2020 5:23 PM Quality of Life 7/30/2020 5:03 PM Retired now but worked here for 25 years and commuted into Temecula. Finally able to move 7/30/2020 5:01 PM here and then retired. My hometown born and raised 7/30/2020 4:53 PM Clean 7/30/2020 1:25 PM Conservative policies and values 7/30/2020 1:13 PM not applicable 7/29/2020 1:57 PM We could not afford to live in San Diego County when we were young working professionals in 6/2/2020 4:38 PM our early 30's 17/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q6 Do you currently own or rent your home? Answered:699 Skipped:163 Own 25.04% Live w oth( Currer home[ 71.10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Own 71.10% 497 Rent 25.04% 175 Live with others 3.58% 25 Currently homeless 0.29% 2 TOTAL 699 18/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q7 If you wish to own a home in Temecula but do not currently own one, what issues are preventing you from owning a home at this time? (Choose all that apply) Answered:285 Skipped:577 No homes I 55.44% within price... No homes tha 12.98% suit my need Do not have MW . down paymen 51.58% Do not have enough for... 32.98% No homes tha� 7.02% fit quality. do note17.54% r.. to own or re.. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES No homes within price range No homes that suit my needs Do not have a down payment Do not have enough for mortgage payment No homes that fit quality standards I do not wish to own or rent a home in Temecula Total Respondents: 285 RESPONSES 55.44% 158 12.98% 37 51.58% 147 32.98% 94 7.02% 20 17.54% 50 19/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q8 Select the type of housing that best describes your current home: Answered:671 Skipped: 191 Single Famil Home (Detached Accessory 0.75% Dwelling Uni... Mobile Home 1.34% Duplex/Attached 3.13% Home Multifamily Home... Currently 0.15% without... Other (pleas 1 49% specify 0% 10% 81.07% 12.07% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Single Family Home (Detached) 81.07% 544 Accessory Dwelling Unit, Granny Flat, Guest House 0.75% 5 Mobile Home 1.34% 9 Duplex/Attached Home 3.13% 21 Multifamily Home (Apartment/Condominium) 12.07% 81 Currently without permanent shelter 0.15% 1 Other (please specify) 1.49% 10 TOTAL 671 20 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) I don't know Apartment Apartment Section 8- Senior apartment complex Manufacture Home own the Land Sycamore Springs Ranches - a custom home and horse boarding ranch rental apartment Detached condo Rent a room Very tiny single bedroom apartment DATE 9/16/2020 9:19 AM 9/15/2020 11:47 AM 9/15/2020 10:06 AM 9/15/2020 10:03 AM 9/4/2020 3:27 PM 9/4/2020 3:14 PM 8/30/2020 12:02 AM 8/28/2020 2:32 AM 8/2/2020 9:59 AM 7/30/2020 4:33 PM 21/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q9 Which of the following best describes your household type? Answered:670 Skipped: 192 Single perso� o househol 11.19/° Cou Couple v kids Single par with kids Non -parent 119% with kids <18 M Young adult, 5.07/° ° living with... Multi-generati 10.45% nal househol Single with 1.34% roommate' Couple with 0.15% roommates Other (plea fys 6.12% speci 0% 10% 20% 30% ANSWER CHOICES Single person household Couple Couple with kids <18 Single parent with kids <18 Non -parent with kids <18 Young adult living with parents Multi -generational household Single with roommates Couple with roommates Other (please specify) TOTAL 7% 32.99% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% RESPONSES 11.19% 25.37% 32.99% 6.12% 1.19% 5.07% 10.45% 1.34% 0.15% 6.12% 75 170 221 41 8 34 70 9 1 41 670 22/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE I live with my daughter 9/16/2020 9:41 AM Divorce 9/16/2020 9:25 AM I live with my daughter 9/15/2020 1:17 PM Rent room 9/15/2020 10:13 AM Retired with Adult Disabled Son 9/6/2020 7:14 AM Single parent with child over 18 9/5/2020 10:07 PM Couple with adult children over 18 9/4/2020 3:36 PM couple living with cllege age children 9/4/2020 3:17 PM Single mom with children in college 8/31/2020 3:46 PM Single with adukt child 8/30/2020 5:04 PM Adult with adult special needs son 8/30/2020 11:27 AM Couple with children over 18 and under 18. 8/30/2020 12:32 AM Couple with 3 adult children over 18 8/28/2020 5:55 PM Single parent w/children over 18 8/28/2020 5:23 PM Couple with adult child 8/28/2020 2:41 PM couple with two adult children 8/28/2020 2:37 PM married couple with two adult children living at home 8/28/2020 2:02 PM Couple living with adult child 8/28/2020 1:56 PM my husband, 2daughters and myself 8/28/2020 1:44 PM Couple with college age children who live here during summer and breaks 8/28/2020 1:09 PM Couple with child over 18 8/28/2020 6:04 AM Mother/daughter birth adults 8/21/2020 9:57 PM Couple with Multiple adult children 8/20/2020 12:36 AM I'm head of household with an adult daughter that has epilepsy, two adult sons that have 8/19/2020 9:42 AM recently graduated from local universities and are living with me to pay off their student loans, and I am also a multi- generational household because My mom is living with us because she has cancer and is undergoing chemo Married couple with 3 kids renting room to me 8/14/2020 6:27 PM Empty Nesters with Occasional Stays by Children Over 18 8/12/2020 4:34 PM Couple with children over 18 8/10/2020 3:46 PM Adult Head of Household with children over 18 attending college 8/10/2020 2:30 PM Couple w adult children 8/7/2020 9:28 PM Couple with young adult child with intellectual disability 8/7/2020 5:07 AM Soon to be single person with young adult over 18 lives at home. 8/6/2020 4:29 PM Parents with two adult children (college age - 20/22) 8/5/2020 10:47 AM Couple with 13 and 21 yr olds 8/4/2020 9:36 AM single living with elderly mother 8/1/2020 8:11 AM Single parent with children 18+ I'm surprised this wasn't an option 7/31/2020 2:17 PM 23/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 36 37 38 39 40 41 Single parent with child (21 years old) Single parent with young adult children couple with children both under and over 18 Single Parent with 18 year old Son Couple with child over 18 Couple with children under 18, 1 child 18 + live in boyfriend, roommate 7/31/2020 9:02 AM 7/31/2020 7:02 AM 7/30/2020 10:33 PM 7/30/2020 9:19 PM 7/30/2020 8:55 PM 7/30/2020 5:52 PM 24 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q10 How satisfied are you with your current housing situation? Answered:671 Skipped: 191 I am very satisfied. Iamsomewha satisfied I am somewha 10.43% dissatisfied 35.32% 48.29% I a 5.96% dissatisfied 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES I am very satisfied. I am somewhat satisfied. I am somewhat dissatisfied. I am dissatisfied. TOTAL RESPONSES 48.29% 35.32% 10.43% 5.96% 324 237 70 40 671 25/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 IF YOU ANSWERED DISSATISFIED OR SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED PLEASE PROVIDE A DATE REASON BELOW. The condo we live in is too small and we are one rent increase away from getting priced out of 9/26/2020 8:43 PM the area Cost of rent 9/15/2020 12:16 PM Renters disruptive behavior towards owners 9/15/2020 12:04 PM I am somewhat satisfied because golf balls from golf course continue to damage our house. 1 9/15/2020 10:40 AM am unable to keep up with the repairs. Dissatisfied because 3 children living in house that always needs repairs 9/15/2020 10:24 AM want to move but higher taxes and low inventory make it hard 9/10/2020 10:17 AM Need a Special Needs Setting for son in future 9/6/2020 7:14 AM My property taxes are outrageous 9/5/2020 10:14 AM Neighborhood has a lot of crime 9/4/2020 5:40 PM We need more tennis courts 9/4/2020 3:54 PM Home is too old and needs too much work. HOA fees are too high and not worth price paid. 9/4/2020 3:36 PM New homes by builders have too high of tax. HOA prices on the rise. 9/4/2020 3:29 PM I live in an u safe place and the apartment owners do not take care of them 9/2/2020 6:11 AM Really wanted more garage space and bigger back yard but so few houses on the market we 8/31/2020 1:19 PM had to buy what was available Lessor does not take care of the rental property I live in 8/31/2020 11:13 AM Need larger home for mom with dementia and caregiver 8/30/2020 7:44 PM Small - needs upgrade. No yard 8/30/2020 12:24 PM I would like to own my own place. 8/30/2020 12:02 AM Need access to low income housing for inlaws who are currently living with me 8/29/2020 11:49 PM No HOA. Many ordinance/code violations in neighborhoods 8/29/2020 6:16 PM needs updated and repairs... can't afford to fix 8/29/2020 3:00 PM I prefer a larger house instead of a pricey rental apartment 8/29/2020 2:15 PM Traffic congestion is terrible on main arteries 8/29/2020 2:10 PM 55+ so daughter has been displaced. 8/29/2020 7:31 AM It's old, outdated, in need of significant updating and 16,000 sq ft of landscaping. 8/28/2020 8:06 PM Rent increase forcing me to move out of area. 8/28/2020 6:44 PM We are on fixed incomes and they raise the rent about $70.00 each year. Where are we 8/28/2020 6:01 PM suppose to get the money Difficult to find something affordable for my daughter and 1. 8/28/2020 3:50 PM too small and expensive for what im paying 8/28/2020 2:19 PM I live in a neighborhood filled with renters and families who do not take care of their homes but 8/28/2020 2:02 PM this is the only area of temecula we could afford I live in low income housing. There are so many rules that you can't get comfortable enough to 8/28/2020 1:56 PM make it feel like your home. I have a dream to have a home of my own that I can invite who I want over and stay as long as I want them to or paint a room or get a pet without having to get a drs note. 26 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 32 my house needs a lot of fixing 8/28/2020 1:44 PM 33 Many repairs are needed which my landlord ignores 8/28/2020 1:32 PM 34 Frustration with not having enough financial support to obtain my own home. 8/28/2020 1:23 PM 35 Need upgrading in electrical and plumbing 8/28/2020 1:18 PM 36 Inadequate space and not disabled friendly. 8/27/2020 10:16 PM 37 Want to get my own space 8/27/2020 6:49 PM 38 1 would prefer that all homes have 3 car garages. I don't like living on a street lined with cars 8/27/2020 3:32 PM on both sides. I'd prefer seeing tree lined streets and curb appeal. 39 Want to move 8/25/2020 12:26 AM 40 Our landlord increases our rent any time we ask her to fix anything, including this month, 8/24/2020 8:25 PM during the pandemic because our kitchen faucet was leaking. 41 House is too small 8/24/2020 3:14 PM 42 School district and need a larger home in a family neighborhood 8/24/2020 12:55 PM 43 Rent is Ridiculously expensive 8/24/2020 12:38 PM 44 Too much building everywhere and no sign of building for what we lack. AFFORDABLE 8/24/2020 10:16 AM HOUSING. 45 Would consider larger home in lower density neighborhood 8/24/2020 12:30 AM 46 We live in a working class neighborhood. We want homeowners and person's who are 8/23/2020 5:53 PM hardworking to remain in our neighborhoods. People who own seem more concerned with maintaining their homes and keeping the neighborhood safe and secure. We stand together as we live and work in a shared community. We support law enforcement in our neighborhood and across the city. 47 Looking for my own home 8/20/2020 7:08 AM 48 Apt. Is dark, no sunlight. 8/19/2020 11:04 PM 49 Affordability in our city is absent; therefore we have multigenerational accommodations. 8/19/2020 9:57 PM 50 Want a house at a reasonable price 8/19/2020 9:25 PM 51 Previous homeowner renting and want to buy again but prices are twice what they were 10 8/19/2020 5:37 PM years ago 52 1 just need to be able to rent out rooms as short term rental so that I can afford to keep my 8/19/2020 9:42 AM house. If there was grant money to help me paint or make repairs before it got too bad that would help a lot too 53 can't afford housing 8/19/2020 9:39 AM 54 The homogenous zoning doesn't help but the issue isn't availability of housing but employers 8/18/2020 4:19 PM paying too little. 55 Current living with a relative due to economic hardship and process of divorce 8/18/2020 3:11 PM 56 quality of life in Hemet is unacceptable, and while I work in Temecula, I cannot afford to live in 8/18/2020 1:17 PM Temecula. 57 Run down 8/18/2020 10:02 AM 58 The property management is racist and have harrassed us many times. Neighbors are section 8/17/2020 8:31 PM 8 trashy people, drink and smoke every single day for the past 2 years, with small kids that they do not parent. It turned ourlives into misery. 59 too cramped, too far to work 8/17/2020 10:55 AM 60 1 live in a one bedroom with my daughter because I can't afford a two bedroom for us. 8/14/2020 11:09 PM 61 1 shared restroom for 2 bedroom residence 8/14/2020 5:38 PM 27/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 62 Would like to own rather than waste so much money on rent 8/14/2020 4:21 PM 63 No parking, unsatisfied with property manager 8/14/2020 3:39 PM 64 Bothersome neibors 8/14/2020 1:16 PM 65 We are currently in the process of negotiating the purchase our rental house 8/14/2020 12:02 AM 66 1 would be very satisfied if I could move to a single story in the same neighborhood, there is a 8/12/2020 4:34 PM shortage of single story detached homes. 67 temporarily in an apartment, looking to buy. 8/11/2020 2:22 PM 68 Housing too dense. We can hear the neighbors breath 8/9/2020 10:17 AM 69 Retired 8/6/2020 10:01 PM 70 need more space 8/6/2020 6:01 PM 71 1 wish I had a yard for my dogs and child 8/6/2020 8:17 AM 72 Inadequate affordable housing catered to young adults 8/6/2020 3:55 AM 73 1 would love to be able to give my kids a home and a backyard 8/5/2020 10:19 AM 74 Need to add an ADU. City staff seems to discourage them. 8/5/2020 9:56 AM 75 Too far from work 8/4/2020 6:42 AM 76 Housing is not affordable for young families, almost unattainable. 8/4/2020 1:05 AM 77 Too many transients are starting to appear and crime is going up. 8/3/2020 5:55 PM 78 New houses are either way too expensive or they come built in very tight condos/single 8/3/2020 5:55 PM detached homes that are only 10 feet apart. I make $130k a year and can't even buy a decent home with a yard. 79 Too small and bad HOA 8/3/2020 2:52 PM 80 The house needs alot of updating and want to move away from the casino 8/2/2020 4:23 PM 81 1 would like to be able to afford a place by myself or with one other but not have to live with a 8/2/2020 12:44 PM large amount of people in one small space 82 Not having enough personal space from people within the household as well as neighbors 8/2/2020 11:35 AM 83 Too many cars that screech & race at all hours of the day & night. We need some kind of 8/2/2020 10:58 AM control over this 84 1 want to be able to live on my own without 4 roommates 8/2/2020 10:52 AM 85 Expensive still. Rents gone from 1100 to 2000 in about 8 yrs 7/31/2020 10:26 PM 86 It's a one bedroom guesthouse for 4 people (myself, my mom and my two kids). Can't afford 7/31/2020 9:36 PM anything more. 87 Expensive for age 65, need to downsize 7/31/2020 5:59 PM 88 Rent is too high for wages in the area 7/30/2020 11:20 PM 89 1 can't afford a 2 bedroom apartment. And I'd like a home where my son can have his own 7/30/2020 9:19 PM room 90 Too small 7/30/2020 9:05 PM 91 Pretty expensive would like to downsize but will end up with smaller house close to same price 7/30/2020 8:55 PM 92 It's 800 square feet, things are falling apart. 7/30/2020 6:08 PM 93 1 wish I lived closer to work 7/30/2020 5:51 PM 94 My house is too small for my family size and the neighborhood is not safe. 7/30/2020 5:43 PM 95 1 would prefer to own, though the home prices for a single parent and single income is 7/30/2020 5:10 PM impossible with the current home prices, not to mention the property tax and HOA fees. 28 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 96 Need more adequate space, storage for basic things like a bike of linens. An extra half bath, a 7/30/2020 4:33 PM dishwasher, washer and drier hookups so that I may purchase my own machines, an additional bedroom as there are two of us. 97 Would like to own a home in a 55+ community. Single story under 400k. 7/30/2020 3:27 PM 98 Every year my rent goes up. 7/30/2020 2:42 PM 99 1 would've preferred a one story, didn't plan it very well when we bought our home. 7/30/2020 2:28 PM 100 1 am grateful to be living in a nice city but we are a family of 6 living in a 2 bedroom apartment. 7/30/2020 12:05 PM We need a house but rent is so expensive out here! 29 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q11 What age range most accurately describes you? Answered:666 Skipped:196 Gen Z (0-23 I 1.05% years old) MilleniaL (24-39 years... Genera (40-55 y (Baby Boo 56-74 yeas ( Generat 27.48% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Gen Z (0-23 years old) 1.05% 7 Millenial (24-39 years old) 27.48% 183 Generation X (40-55 years old) 36.19% 241 (Baby Boomers) 56-74 years old 29.58% 197 (Silent Generation) 75 + years old 5.71% 38 TOTAL 666 30 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q12 How important are the following concerns to you and your family? Answered:670 Skipped:192 L_ M 29.24% Ensuring tha children who... Create mixed -use... Ensuretha the housing.. Estab special nei Integrate affordable... 9n_45°1 26.88% 41.80% 36.54% 36.64% 56.52% 48.35% 48.42% 31.08% 31/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 4.50% 37.24% 33.93% Provide shelters and... 23.12% 5.71 % 1& 49.10% 39.19% Encourageth rehabilitati... 8.71% 3.00% 0 46.54% 39.16% Establis programs to... V 11.30% Fair/Eq Ho 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Very Important 0 Somewhat Important M Not Important 0 Don't Know 32 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey VERY SOMEWHAT NOT DON'T TOTAL WEIGHTED IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT KNOW AVERAGE Ensuring that children who grow up in Temecula 56.52% 29.24% 12.14% 2.10% can afford to live in Temecula. 377 195 81 14 667 1.60 Create mixed -use (commercial/office and 41.80% 36.54% 20.45% 1.20% residential) projects in the community that 278 243 136 8 665 1.81 encourage walkable neighborhoods and reduce dependency on automobiles. Ensure that the housing market in Temecula provides a diverse range of housing types, including single-family homes, townhomes, apartments, duplex/triplex and condominiums to meet the varied needs of local residents. Establish special needs housing for seniors, large families, veterans, and/or persons with disabilities. Integrate affordable housing throughout the community to create mixed -income neighborhoods. Provide shelters and transitional housing for the homeless, along with services to help move people into permanent housing. Encourage the rehabilitation of existing housing stock in older neighborhoods. Establish programs to help at -risk homeowners keep their homes, including mortgage loan programs. Fair/Equitable Housing opportunities and programs to help maintain and secure neighborhoods that have suffered foreclosures. 48.35% 26.88% 23.42% 1.35% 322 179 156 9 666 1.78 48.42% 36.69% 13.53% 1.35% 322 244 90 9 665 1.68 36.64% 27.78% 31.08% 4.50% 244 185 207 30 666 2.03 37.24% 33.93% 23.12% 5.71% 248 226 154 38 666 1.97 49.10% 39.19% 8.71% 3.00% 327 261 58 20 666 1.66 46.54% 39.16% 11.30% 3.01% 309 260 75 20 664 1.71 48.20% 36.08% 11.68% 4.04% 322 241 78 27 668 1.72 33 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q13 Do you feel that the different housing types in Temecula currently meet your housing needs? Answered:657 Skipped:205 Yes 64.84% No 35.16% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 64.84% No 35.16% TOTAL 426 231 657 34 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q14 What types of housing are most needed in the City of Temecula? Answered:664 Skipped:198 Single Family (Detached) 49.10% Duplex/Attache 20.33% Housin Condominium 24.40% (multifamily.. r . _... .._ 13.40% (multifamily.. Senior Housinp� 33.73% Accessory 10.39% Dwelling Unit Housing 12.65/o o peoplee with.ith.. Other (pleas 23.95% specify 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Single Family (Detached) 49.10% 326 Duplex/Attached Housing 20.33% 135 Condominiums (multifamily ownership homes) 24.40% 162 Apartments (multifamily rental homes) 13.40% 89 Senior Housing 33.73% 224 Accessory Dwelling Unit 10.39% 69 Housing for people with disabilities (Please specify in comment field below) 12.65% 84 Other (please specify) 23.95% 159 Total Respondents: 664 35 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE Low rent/homeless housing 9/24/2020 7:39 PM Markets 9/16/2020 9:35 AM Markets 9/16/2020 9:22 AM No opinion 9/16/2020 9:19 AM We don't need more traffic/horrible 9/16/2020 9:13 AM AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLEASE 9/15/2020 12:16 PM or public financial assistance to make homes ADA compliant instead of building more 9/15/2020 10:40 AM structures to allow disabled persons to remain in their homes. Apartment that single people with children can afford 9/15/2020 10:24 AM I'd rather see conversions rather than new builds 9/15/2020 10:20 AM with washing machine and dryer 9/15/2020 10:10 AM low income housing 9/9/2020 3:44 PM Group complex for Disabled Adult son needing financial support in Special Needs Trust 9/6/2020 7:14 AM No more housing. We need a better infrastructure, more schools. Too many houses/ people to 9/5/2020 10:14 AM accommodate as it is. We are so full right now, the only thing is duplex's and I'am against. 9/4/2020 7:08 PM upscale 55 and older communities 9/4/2020 5:14 PM No opinion 9/4/2020 4:15 PM More Single Story Homes 9/4/2020 4:12 PM none 9/4/2020 3:17 PM all the above 9/4/2020 3:14 PM affordable housing 9/3/2020 7:21 AM Low income housing 9/2/2020 6:11 AM Low cost housing for people with low income 9/1/2020 10:20 AM T 8/31/2020 11:14 PM Not sure 8/31/2020 9:44 PM Stroke and brain injury survivors 8/31/2020 11:13 AM More affordable multi generation homes 8/30/2020 7:44 PM None. Stop building! Traffic is horrible 8/30/2020 5:04 PM None. I moved here from a similar town where I grew up. They quickly added apartments and 8/30/2020 12:22 PM multi use buildings and didn't plan for the increased traffic. Need affordable apts for special needs 8/30/2020 11:27 AM Low income senior housing 8/29/2020 11:49 PM Permanent Supportive Housing 8/29/2020 7:16 PM Fairly priced housing for the youth just starting to be out on their own. This will not force them 8/29/2020 7:31 AM to have to move to questionable neighborhoods. More multiuse property areas with reduced need for cars 8/28/2020 7:39 PM Affordable housing for people not requiring Section 8 housing, though cannot afford high rent. 8/28/2020 6:44 PM Affordable housing 8/28/2020 6:01 PM 36 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 WO Low income housing 8/28/2020 3:50 PM Affordable housing with disabled amenity's, so disabled people do not end up on the street & 8/28/2020 3:48 PM homeless. No more housing. 8/28/2020 3:14 PM affordable housing for all 8/28/2020 2:37 PM Don't know 8/28/2020 2:02 PM We need more house that low income people can buy!!!!! 8/28/2020 1:56 PM I have a daughter with a mental illness and it would be very good if we can get a house where 8/28/2020 1:44 PM we can live better Don't know, why would you expect this kind of information from a survey 8/28/2020 1:43 PM Single family 55+ homes. 8/28/2020 1:34 PM Homes low -mid income families Could afford 8/28/2020 1:32 PM low income housing opportunities 8/28/2020 1:21 PM Housing for homeless 8/28/2020 1:11 PM I feel Temecula should stop expanding and stop building houses. The community is already 8/28/2020 8:09 AM too impacted with people, cars, etc. I am opposed to the new law that allows ADUs. I purchased my home for the view and privacy. 8/27/2020 3:32 PM An ADU next door would affect both and I would move if that happened. Affordable 8/27/2020 1:23 PM Close to shops, affordable. 8/25/2020 12:26 AM None it's great as is 8/24/2020 1:02 PM AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR SIGLE MOM'S WITH CHILDREN TO LIVE NEAR WHERE 8/24/2020 10:16 AM THEY WORK. Homes that are handicap accessible for elderly and for disabled veterans 8/24/2020 12:30 AM I feel that people with PHYSICAL disabilities should have the same access to the Same 8/22/2020 5:30 AM Communities as the 55+ do, Since most of us require the same amount of care if not more! I strongly feel that people with Physical Disabilities who desire to live Independently should be able to do so in a SAFE city like Temecula CA I feel that the city doesn't need anymore housing and we are already at capacity 8/21/2020 1:15 PM Sorry I don't mean to be NIMBY but apartments and homeless populations can go be built in 8/21/2020 12:17 PM Murrieta or menifee. Designing these services will attract a different kind of demographic. No thanks. affordable housing for working families, homeless who want to stay here 8/21/2020 11:38 AM More affordable housing 8/21/2020 5:25 AM Most have 2-5year wait list for low income senior apts. 8/19/2020 11:04 PM None. There are plenty of housing types already. Temecula is overcrowded as it is. Plenty of 8/19/2020 9:24 PM room to build north of Menifee. None! No more new housing 8/19/2020 8:39 PM Affordable housing for low income families. 8/19/2020 7:05 PM Shelter 8/19/2020 5:15 PM Senior single unit detached homes that are affordable and size appropriate for retirement and 8/19/2020 1:39 PM special care needs. Not high rise apartments! Homeless 8/19/2020 10:15 AM 37 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 67 Low-cost housing for our very low-income and homeless population. 8/19/2020 10:02 AM 68 Single story homes for FTB 8/19/2020 9:50 AM 69 1 have a daughter with epilepsy and a son with a neurological condition, they will need housing 8/19/2020 9:42 AM if I die 70 Affordable housing 8/19/2020 8:36 AM 71 Down -payments are hard 8/19/2020 8:19 AM 72 We have enough! We need jobs 8/19/2020 7:57 AM 73 Anything affordable 8/17/2020 9:55 PM 74 Reasonably priced housing 8/17/2020 2:05 PM 75 medium income housing, not high or low 8/17/2020 10:55 AM 76 We do not want or need low income housing!!! Studies show that crime is increased in these 8/15/2020 12:59 AM areas making our children even more vulnerable! 77 Low income housing 8/14/2020 11:09 PM 78 live work play 8/14/2020 2:51 PM 79 More low income housing needed and housing to minimize the problems caused by homeless 8/13/2020 5:53 PM 80 No more homes needed. Too many now 8/12/2020 9:48 AM 81 No more development! The current infrastructure can't handle the existing traffic, much less 8/12/2020 8:14 AM additional families. 82 Stop building fix the off ramps 8/11/2020 9:53 PM 83 Affordable housing. SFR 8/11/2020 9:17 PM 84 Mixed neighborhoods with groceries 8/11/2020 5:54 PM 85 Single family homes under 2000sf are very difficult to find in Temecula. 8/11/2020 2:22 PM 86 No housing with a supported/group management office for individuals with special needs. 8/10/2020 3:46 PM 87 People with disabilities don't have many options for housing in Temecula and it drives people 8/10/2020 2:30 PM to move away from where they grew up because housing options are not available here. If they were, other programs could be brought in to help support them. 88 More affordable apartment's 8/10/2020 2:23 PM 89 More single story. More affordable housing. 8/9/2020 10:17 AM 90 NONE 8/7/2020 9:28 PM 91 Habitat for Humanity type housing opportunities 8/7/2020 8:34 PM 92 House with accessory sweeping unit or "casita" 8/7/2020 6:38 PM 93 Don't know 8/7/2020 2:22 PM 94 Small complexes of houses for co -housing, 8/7/2020 5:07 AM 95 Nothing , stop building more homes we do not need more housing here 8/7/2020 5:01 AM 96 more inclusive housing options like the upcoming Cypress Ridge townhomes on Pechanga 8/6/2020 5:34 PM Pkwy 97 Sliding scale housing. 8/6/2020 4:29 PM 98 We need more affordable apartments / condos 8/6/2020 4:11 PM 99 single level homes for aging population 8/6/2020 8:46 AM 100 We like Temecula a lot, but we don't want to pick between a tiny apartment or an oversized (for 8/6/2020 8:19 AM us) giant home, regardless of what we can afford. There are very few modest homes ever available for people like us. 38 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 101 Affordable rent 8/6/2020 7:35 AM 102 More one story homes 8/5/2020 8:57 PM 103 Autism 8/5/2020 8:51 PM 104 None 8/5/2020 2:18 PM 105 Do not want to change! Prefer single family homes. This is why we live in suburbs 8/5/2020 2:10 PM 106 More single -story homes instead of two-story homes 8/5/2020 10:47 AM 107 Affordable housing 8/5/2020 10:19 AM 108 1 don't know, not knowledgeable enough 8/5/2020 10:16 AM 109 There are too many homes in Temecula. 8/5/2020 10:06 AM 110 Please do not build any more houses! 8/5/2020 10:05 AM 111 Senior housing that doesn't cost $3000/mo. Actively encourage ADU's. 8/5/2020 9:56 AM 112 Single story 8/5/2020 9:40 AM 113 no more needed 8/4/2020 12:35 PM 114 Affordable workforce housing 8/4/2020 7:48 AM 115 Mixed -use commercial on ground, residential on top, mid -rise buildings 8/4/2020 12:55 AM 116 Less houses 8/3/2020 5:20 PM 117 Temecula seem to have reached housing variety 8/3/2020 3:20 PM 118 Low income housing for single parents 8/3/2020 7:17 AM 119 Affordable housing 8/2/2020 7:41 PM 120 We don't need anymore homes built. The infrastructure is not support mire homes 8/2/2020 4:23 PM 121 More truly affordable housing for working class people 8/2/2020 12:44 PM 122 Permanent supportive housing 8/2/2020 11:45 AM 123 Low income housing for single Moms, so the can live near where they work & can afford to live 8/2/2020 10:58 AM without their salaries being spent on rent! I know of no place in Temecula, life this for single parents, especially for single Moms. 124 Affordable Housing for all of the above 8/2/2020 8:55 AM 125 Homes with ample space between them 8/1/2020 10:54 AM 126 Small single family homes, not these gigantic 2 story 5 bedroom homes 8/1/2020 9:52 AM 127 Low income home for single parent 7/31/2020 10:26 PM 128 AFFORDABLE "Active" Senior 55+ Neighborhoods, AFFORDABLE Apartments, I feel there is 7/31/2020 5:59 PM enough assisted living 129 Properties with larger lots 7/31/2020 5:20 PM 130 The city is great as it is. It shouldn't keep growing bigger! Traffic's already getting heavy and 7/31/2020 5:01 PM stressful! 131 1 like the mixed -use housing concept like in Old Town 7/31/2020 2:59 PM 132 None. The area can not handle any more traffic!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 7/31/2020 2:54 PM 133 Smaller but still high quality homes (1200-1800 sqft) and homes with larger lot sizes. Newer 7/31/2020 2:17 PM stock seems to be mostly McMansions on postage stamp lots 134 Single story homes 7/31/2020 2:15 PM 135 Provide more single story homes and condo/townhomes as single story 7/31/2020 2:13 PM 39 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 136 We have too much traffic as it is. Dont need any more homes 7/31/2020 12:28 PM 137 1 feel there needs to be more options for single people, but not necessarily condiminiums as 7/31/2020 8:36 AM they usually come with large HOA costs. I would love to see neighborhoods of detached small homes with very low HOA fees that are accessible to lower income people. 138 Senior communities (not apartment style but whole communities) and SINGLE STORY 7/31/2020 6:47 AM OPTIONS. My in-laws have been looking for four years and no luck because they are so rare to find in anything besides a tiny little rundown duplex. 139 subsidized housing 7/30/2020 10:33 PM 140 Housing that's affordable, safe and nice like what you'd want to live 7/30/2020 9:19 PM 141 Workforce housing/ownership 7/30/2020 8:55 PM 142 We had a great city until the city council got in be with developers. Lots of apartments ruin a 7/30/2020 7:25 PM city and require lots of service calls from police and fire. Welcome to temec=downey whittier 143 Studio/loft/professional dwellings 7/30/2020 7:15 PM 144 Lower income housing 7/30/2020 5:54 PM 145 Housing options for single parents 7/30/2020 5:51 PM 146 Affordable housing 7/30/2020 5:43 PM 147 Affordable housing for lower income 7/30/2020 5:26 PM 148 Less rentals and more affordable homeownership 7/30/2020 4:33 PM 149 Homes for veteran and with physical disabilities 7/30/2020 3:31 PM 150 Smaller single family homes 7/30/2020 3:20 PM 151 Tiny homes that are affordable to low income people that work in Temecula 7/30/2020 2:58 PM 152 Unsure. There appears to be enough housing, would hate to see it become overpopulated and 7/30/2020 2:44 PM turn into another congested city. 153 Affordable Senior homes - smaller single units near shopping centers, grocers, pharmacies, 7/30/2020 2:35 PM etc. 154 Affordable to the kids who grew up here. 7/30/2020 1:39 PM 155 None 7/30/2020 1:37 PM 156 Wheelchair accessible housing 7/30/2020 1:07 PM 157 Low to moderate income affordable homes 7/30/2020 12:05 PM 158 Larger lots for single-family homes. Developments are too tightly -packed. Where are the 10- 6/8/2020 11:25 AM 15k square foot lots? It's either 5-7k square foot lots or multi -acre lots in De Luz/Wine Country. Very little in the middle. 159 Permanent supportive housing 6/2/2020 4:41 PM 40 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q15 Please remember to visit the website for more details on the Housing Element Update at the link below:https://temeculaca.gov/432/Housing- Element Are there any comments or concerns you would like to share with the City of Temecula relevant to the upcoming Housing Element Update? Answered:255 Skipped:607 41/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey # RESPONSES DATE 1 None 9/24/2020 1:53 PM 2 Senior communities would be nice. Or else we may move 9/24/2020 1:44 PM 3 The cost of rent here does not match the income that many of us have forcing many to 9/24/2020 1:18 PM struggle, have roommates, constantly move etc. More affordable housing that matches the jobs available that only want to pay $17 or less would help out a great deal so people can afford to live without roommates and without struggling to pay everything 4 Just want affordable housing for all income types. It would reduce homelessness and bring 9/24/2020 1:11 PM diversity to the city. 5 It is disappointing to see zonings changed and other adjustments that are aimed to please the 9/24/2020 11:21 AM person(s) financially benefitting rather than thinking about the value in the original zoning as well as congestion and overloading the market. 6 Please encourage low income senior housing as a priority. 9/24/2020 11:14 AM 7 Can't afford computer! Why do you waste so much water and still have trees and plants but cut 9/16/2020 9:13 AM in half and only water public areas in early AM late PM 8 Would like to see more housing for seniors with limited senior income. 9/16/2020 9:09 AM 9 The housing and property taxes here in Temecula are out of control. I believe it is designed to 9/15/2020 2:55 PM not integrate but segregate. 10 Too much growth without infrastructure to support. Roads/traffic too heavy and maintenance 9/15/2020 1:55 PM not adequate to support the additional homes being built. 11 Looking forward and praying that someday I can acquire my own Senior home. Many thanks 9/15/2020 11:41 AM for concern. 12 Can the City require Redhawk Golf Club to implement ways to minimize or mitigate damage 9/15/2020 10:40 AM caused by errant golf balls to our houses (windows, stucco, patio, or even people being injured)? It's probably a matter of when, not if, I or a family members gets seriously injured by an errant golf ball. I have been hit by a golf ball in the back. Thankfully it did not land on my head. I now have to wear a hard hat every time I am in our back yard. Thank you for considering my input. 13 1 come from a state that passed legislation to preserve open space. I am dismayed by all the 9/15/2020 10:20 AM building here. Every new development means more traffic lights, more traffic, more students in the schools, and more importantly more water usage. 14 No more apartments or section 8 9/14/2020 10:21 PM 15 Make it easier, faster and less expensive to develop new housing 9/5/2020 6:40 PM 16 Stop building more houses until you have the schools and infrastructure to support the people 9/5/2020 10:14 AM already here. 17 prices are out of control due to supply in demand.... 9/5/2020 7:12 AM 18 Dedicated Bicycle and walking trails, more open space parks, more exits from freeway and 9/5/2020 7:05 AM road widening to accommodate traffic as housing/population increases. 19 Make it easier to add an ADU. For example, provide (free!) the (approved!) architectural plans 9/5/2020 12:01 AM for 4-6 different ADUs. Rather than making each individual homeowner come up with their own (although that should still be an option) the city can just give out plans that meet all of their guidelines. 20 I'm very concerned about a housings duplex I heard about west Temecula parkway by 1-15, 9/4/2020 7:08 PM adding more congestion and ruining the beautiful hill side, that all Temecula's love seeing. 21 Transportation is an interdependency with housing, I don't see how they can be 9/4/2020 3:58 PM compartmentalized. 22 Retired people need more to do or they leave. Tennis Courts are extremely in need as are 9/4/2020 3:54 PM public places to Lap swim. Thank you for keeping Chs open for lap swim 42 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 23 24 25 KV, 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 W. 47 48 49 I think we need to do more to help get homeless of the street but what that looks like I am not 9/4/2020 3:49 PM sure. I do not want Temecula to turn into what LA, San Fran and Austin are seeing now. I believe in helping people get back on their feet and not in enabling them or making them rely on others. No 9/4/2020 3:36 PM You need to strongly consider the enormous tax assessments that are assessed to new 9/4/2020 3:36 PM homes. Even our home purchased in 2008 had unaffordable taxes. So we move to an older neighborhood within Temecula after 10 years because the taxes were out of control. Avoid construction of multi -units or apartments that makes real estate prices go down and 9/4/2020 3:29 PM increases traffic in the area. Install the infrastructure before building home or multi family homes PLEASE 9/4/2020 3:27 PM No 9/4/2020 3:14 PM N/A 9/4/2020 3:11 PM My family moved to Temecula in 1968, moved to Murrieta in 2013. 9/4/2020 3:07 PM Don't allow section 8 housing to be grouped Together. Don't allow homeless to live rear river 9/1/2020 10:24 AM beds. Continue police force. We are in great need of affordable housing options in our area for all types of people. 9/1/2020 10:20 AM no 8/31/2020 11:14 PM With the state, country, and world moving toward renewable energy -some HOAs in Temecula 8/31/2020 9:44 PM still do not allow solar on roofs. With the climate and typical yardscape here, solar installation on a roof just makes too much sense for the city and homeowners. Not too much reduce the stress on an overloaded power grid and reduce the risk of fires. The city should adopt a mandate that prevents HOAs from banning solar roofs. More solar initiatives 8/31/2020 11:13 AM n/a 8/31/2020 7:33 AM Predatory mortgage collection companies should be outlawed. 8/31/2020 12:20 AM I didn't see any homeless when I moved to Temecula 15 years ago. Now, there are many 8/30/2020 11:30 PM homeless people. Many of them are young people. They need assistance. No 8/30/2020 9:55 PM Reinstate short term rentals. These are OUR homes. Let us capitalize on the tourist income 8/30/2020 5:04 PM since you built it and brought all the traffic with it. Work on more affordable taxes or lower/shorter term Mello -Roos. 8/30/2020 12:24 PM Don't be so eager to plan for new housing development. I realize that the City can make money 8/30/2020 12:22 PM off of it but it may lose the charm of a quiet country town. I'd like to see this money and effort go towards fire safety, homeless and drug rehab programs and centers. Need assisted living for special needs 8/30/2020 11:27 AM I'm hoping that Temecula includes Murrieta, Wildomar, Menifee and surrounding suburbs. 8/30/2020 12:02 AM My inlaws have recently relocated from the East Coast to Temecula to be near family. They 8/29/2020 11:49 PM are in their 70's. While, I have them living with me for now, the intent was for them to find their own place in independent senior living. It is very disappointing that there is a 3 to 5 year wait list for low income senior housing in Temecula. There really needs to be more units available. I don't think that Ca should overrule CC&Rs allowing houses to run preschools in the middle of 8/29/2020 9:37 PM single housing tracts when businesses aren't allowed and we pay fees to maintain the CC&Rs. None 8/29/2020 8:48 PM Please adopt a by -right process for multifamily housing. 8/29/2020 7:16 PM You keep building houses but yet the infrastructure such as highways East to West is terrible. 8/29/2020 2:10 PM 43/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Winchester for an example takes me 50 min to 70 minutes to get from business park drive to Murrieta hot springs Anytime from 3:30 To 6:30pm and longer on weekends. I'm very frustrated.... and thinking of moving. Your planning needs a better plan .... 50 Never, ever build in the southwest hills, or near preservation areas. Limit building to housing, 8/29/2020 11:42 AM not entertainment venue. 51 No 8/29/2020 9:13 AM 52 No 8/29/2020 9:04 AM 53 There used to be more opportunities in buying a home that was a fixer upper. VA repos were 8/29/2020 7:31 AM affordable. Why is that not a program to be offered? 54 N/A 8/28/2020 10:29 PM 55 No comment. 8/28/2020 9:06 PM 56 no 8/28/2020 8:06 PM 57 My condo was built in 2005. I'm an original owner. Sloppy construction, no oversight and 8/28/2020 7:39 PM shoddy electrical work. Another area of concern is the lack of oversight of HOA Property Management Firms. Their charges to HOA's are aligned with THEIR desires, not owners within the HOA. Please address this lack of oversight as property owners are their clients. Thank you for seeking our input. 58 Thank you for reaching out to find out the needs of the surrounding communities. We visit and 8/28/2020 6:44 PM sop in your area. Attend your functions as well. 59 My concern is about the traffic issues when more homes are built. Is the traffic issue also part 8/28/2020 6:35 PM of this program? 60 Please let me know if there are any programs to purchase homes 8/28/2020 6:11 PM 61 Please get some sort of rent control in temecula, especially for seniors 8/28/2020 6:01 PM 62 Do not start building lower -income type housing in Temecula. There are other areas where 8/28/2020 5:23 PM lower -income families can go. As much as I hate to say it, lower -income families bring in more crime and depreciation to hard working succesful families dreams. I wish it would not be this way but these are the facts. 63 low income housing shouldn't be just for emergency needs. Ive tried everywhere and only 8/28/2020 3:50 PM found about 4-6 in the neighborhood. 64 no 8/28/2020 3:48 PM 65 More affordable housing for all. 8/28/2020 2:37 PM 66 property taxes are very high and this prevents lower income folks from buying 8/28/2020 2:29 PM 67 We need to have more homes build for single parents who have very limited income through 8/28/2020 2:19 PM Habitat for Humanity and the area 68 Have loved living in Temecula. Would not like to see great changes to the current General 8/28/2020 2:02 PM Plan or Housing Element. 69 Builders that are building in the area are pricing the new homes were not many people can 8/28/2020 2:00 PM afford. This includes more taxes and hoa paid by seniors at summers bend new communities. Hoa and taxes for 55 older adults are $300 and 1.79taxes. Younger than 55 pay $200 hoa and 1.7 taxes. Is this fair for seniors? Harold Stewart 9512901808 70 There's not a lot for seniors to do here. The senior center is only for low income folks and their 8/28/2020 1:55 PM day trips are to the library. Huh? I Think it's important to keep older citizens active and engaged in the community. This is a young family city. 71 Seniors do not have enough income to afford utilities. There should be a better program for 8/28/2020 1:54 PM this. This is for my parents and not for me. 72 1 live in perris and I am in the housing list 8/28/2020 1:44 PM 73 People like / need to feel safe. 8/28/2020 1:43 PM 44/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 97 98 NA 8/28/2020 1:32 PM Trying to past legislature that encourages millennial's to pursue owning a home in Temecula. 8/28/2020 1:23 PM The homeless population continues to grow in Temecula, creating unsafe environments in 8/28/2020 8:09 AM some areas. I am not comfortable allowing my teenagers to go to some areas of the city. Tax rates and the fact that I could get a larger, nicer house for less money kept me from 8/28/2020 6:04 AM buying in Temecula and sent me to French Valley. Some areas are priced high to keep minorities out. Lack of information on home loans for 8/27/2020 10:16 PM minorities. The apartment prequalifications are too high. Can afford rent, but having to make 2.5 times 8/27/2020 6:49 PM rent in salary is too much None 8/27/2020 2:00 PM Temecula is pushing out the middle class because of housing costs 8/27/2020 1:23 PM I'm concerned about city maintaining safety and keeping police of Temecula 8/27/2020 1:53 AM I would like to see the city offer some kind of insensitive to homeowners to prune their palm 8/26/2020 8:05 PM trees. No 8/26/2020 7:43 PM It has gone downhill since we lived here 2000-2010. Now 2016-present. Police aren't keeping 8/25/2020 12:26 AM things together, so many houses, a lot of cars. It's grown, in a bad way. Nothing to do and no longer perfect for a family. None 8/24/2020 8:52 PM We understand that is is a very nice area but the lack of a rent increase cap is hurting families. 8/24/2020 8:25 PM Please consider a rent increase cap to keep families who live and work here from having to relocate. The housing for sale and rental are way too expensive 8/24/2020 3:14 PM Adult autism housing 8/24/2020 3:12 PM We have too many homeless people along Temecula Parkway. They need to be relocated. 8/24/2020 2:50 PM I don't believe there should be any more low income housing in Temecula. If you need more 8/24/2020 1:02 PM money from the feds then you should figure out how to do a better job and quit spending our money. More resources for affordable housing need to be made available and also on the City Website 8/24/2020 12:38 PM You allow too many housing projects off major streets that are already difficult to drive on, 8/24/2020 10:16 AM because of traffic. One example is the building on Rancho California between Margarita & Ynez. Also, the unbelievable building along Butterfield, north of Rancho California. More traffic problems . It's quite obvious to me that the conservative leadership in Temecula doesn't work for all of the Temecula residents, but when "following the money", we can all see who is benefiting and who isn't. There is enough low income housing we want homeowners and people that are employed to be 8/24/2020 1:12 AM attracted to our community. They contribute their resources to build our communities. They are stakeholders and the backbone or all excellent cities. Temecula housing programs and strategies must be colorblind and open to all Americans 8/24/2020 12:30 AM regardless of race, creed, national origin, etc., while also promoting economic efficiency and free and open markets. It seems that we do have adequate low income housing in the city. Single family 8/23/2020 5:53 PM homeownership provides a stake in the community. Employed person's with resources make their lives here and contribute financially to support the cities businesses, medical facilities in a way that promotes positive growth for all. We feel discriminated in getting a loan from the lander or landlord. 8/22/2020 7:01 AM I would like to See More Homes/Apartments available for the PHYSICALLY disabled! The city 8/22/2020 5:30 AM 45/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey of Temecula has 55+ Communities which is great for those in need of it ... I STRONGLY believe that people who are PHYSICALLY disabled should be included in those communities 99 Please stop building anymore homes. We have over crowding here in the Temecula Valley and 8/21/2020 1:15 PM Everyone I talks to wishes that you would bring in more Jobs! Our streets are over crowded and Traffic is a Nightmare! 100 Maybe it will be different because of working remote for white collar workers but I lived in 8/21/2020 12:17 PM temecula and commuted to carlsbad/San Diego/riverside since 2001 and the last 3 years were torture it would take 30 mins to even hop on Rancho cal at 530am. There are no jobs here. I grew up here, I'm nearing 40, 1 have an mba and I love temecula but I have no kids. I'm here for now due to covid but given the choice between buying a big house in temecula with all my friends married and making fun of my life decisions (when are you getting settled down), i would rather live peacefully and simply in a small condo near the coast. The wine tourism is great here but it's hot, full of children. Keep temecula for FAMILIES not homeless or single people. We aren't your target market :) many of my friends with families are priced out of temecula and living in menifee. It feels like temecula is aging like me haha , my parents still live here and a lot of my friends from high school Parents also. I remember in the 90s heated discussions about apartments. We don't more apartments here the ones we have there are shootings at (Rancho cal just saying). I also don't know where the heck these homeless druggies are coming from it's been 10-15 years and it's disgusting to avoid the target Starbucks and vons because of fear of encountering a tweaker. 101 Everything about Temecula is great except the traffic. More housing means more people and 8/21/2020 8:29 AM more traffic. Please the importance of open spaces and the need for expanded roads and freeway on/off ramps when increasing housing. 102 The rent has gone up exponentially, so much so that people aren't able to maintain the cost of 8/21/2020 5:25 AM living in Temecula. 103 When housing prices increase, even with low interest, they're out of range of the average 8/21/2020 2:12 AM California worker, especially with the high property tax! 104 1 sincerely hope that this survey isn't use just to check a box, as a requirement to justify the 8/19/2020 9:57 PM Block Grants from state and federal. We need affordable housing. 105 Community College brings roommate situations that drive up rent for apartments and multi 8/19/2020 9:25 PM room homes - this hurts one income families 106 Yes. Temecula is overcrowded. Way too many apartments and condos. The city council was 8/19/2020 9:24 PM going the right direction with making it more of a destination or tourist town but now they want to ruin the natural beauty with more housing. There are areas north of Menifee that can take more housing and where new infrastructure can be built. Temecula is maxed out. 107 Stop building. This city is quickly becoming congested, leading to impatient drivers, increase 8/19/2020 8:39 PM littering and lack of care for the community. 108 Home prices have outpaced wages and the rental market has also doubled in price with a large 8/19/2020 5:37 PM amount of homes renting over $3000 and up. Lots of foreign investors buying up our market and setting rents very high. 109 no 8/19/2020 1:59 PM 110 Finding affordable housing for those who work and serve in the community is critical. Providing 8/19/2020 1:39 PM options for seniors to leave larger homes for affordable smaller and energy efficient homes is important for an aging population. 111 Need more mental health assistance for homeless. Need drug and alcohol programs for 8/19/2020 11:50 AM homeless outreach 112 The price range to buy a home in Temecula is expensive for a single parent 8/19/2020 11:36 AM 113 Not sure if this is the proper place but what is being done about the homeless population. In 8/19/2020 11:35 AM our short time of living in CA, especially in Temecula, I do not see an improvement with the homeless. They are still present in certain parts of town. There is so much land east of here, why can't shelters and a small community be built there? We pay so many taxes in CA but I'm having a hard time seeing where the money is going. 114 We need to have a system to accommodate low income and homeless persons. 8/19/2020 10:15 AM 46 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 115 People complain about our homeless population, yet we don't housing for them. I believe the 8/19/2020 10:02 AM City fears this would encourage and increase our homeless population, yet we must do something as, with the current economy, we will be seeing more and more homeless families. 116 Easy way to apply for FTB programs. It's hard to know which direction to go with no knowledge 8/19/2020 9:50 AM and I wish there would be a community resource that could help First time buyers who don't understand what to do. There are thousands of FTB in Temecula who need help but don't know where to go to. All my friends in their late 20's who are ready to buy in Temecula get intimidated by the pricing and not knowing all the info 117 1 respectfully ask for you to reconsider allowing us to go back to the short term rentals 8/19/2020 9:42 AM because its the only way that some of us can survive and pay our mortgages because we have sick or disabled family members that count on us. Without being able to rent rooms out on a short term basis when needed at least 3 people in my household would have to depend on county/city resources for housing and additional assistance. Thank you 118 1 have worked in Temecula for 15 years and have never been able to afford to purchase a 8/19/2020 8:36 AM home here. Always had to drive from cheaper cities. We need more affordable housing. 119 We have enough housing projects. We dont want homeless people here. 8/19/2020 7:57 AM 120 No 8/18/2020 7:47 PM 121 Please emphasize livability for residents over profitability for developers. Don't build 8/18/2020 4:19 PM apartments that look like prisons but cost as much as a home. More importantly please emphasize the issue isn't a housing shortage but an income shortage/affordability crisis. 122 I'd like information on housing programs to help first time home buyers with down payment 8/18/2020 3:11 PM options. 123 There's a lot of road rage here. A lot of bullying in schools (not currently for obvious reasons). 8/18/2020 2:01 PM And not enough police presence. Thank you. 124 Temecula, as a city, needs far more diversity. It doesn't feel or appear to include all races and 8/18/2020 1:17 PM individuals from various socio-economic backgrounds. It feels and appears to contain mostly White, affluent Republicans with racist beliefs and unfair practices towards minorities. This makes the housing situation biased and racially divided. 125 None 8/18/2020 10:02 AM 126 Remove the homeless 8/17/2020 9:01 PM 127 The safety of our neighborhood is in danger many, many robberies and car theft plus very low 8/17/2020 8:31 PM income trashy people taking the people's peace away due to section B. We cant wait to move away after 4 years in peace the last 2 has been horrible, with the tenants section 8 next door, drinking, smoking, fighting, sheriffs coming all the time etc. 128 Houses are very expensive in Temecula. Just because someone doesn't make a lot of money 8/17/2020 2:05 PM doesn't mean they are going to ruin the neighborhood. 129 Not at this time 8/17/2020 1:59 PM 130 Why not be more fair and balanced in your PSA's. We want facts not fear! 8/17/2020 11:14 AM 131 Please keep Temecula looking nice and clean. 8/17/2020 8:02 AM 132 1 would love a lower rental rate for my apartment in Old Town as I am turning 70 years old this 8/16/2020 9:59 PM month and would like to be able to have a little more money to enjoy my last years. I love Temecula and especially feel privileged to live in Old Town and in the same location for the last 14/15 years. 133 It is imperative that you not place low income housing next to family neighborhoods and 8/15/2020 12:59 AM schools. Studies show that Section 8 housing attracts drug use and other crimes and we don't want our children exposed to this type of environment. We would leave Temecula if the city does this. 134 Please help with the local homeless community in Old Town Temecula. I do not feel safe in the 8/14/2020 11:09 PM late evening when they are roaming around near my home. 135 The city needs to focus on providing affordable housing for its essential workers. People who 8/14/2020 4:21 PM work hard and are willing to pay a mortgage that meets their budget. 47/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 136 If you are going to build more buildings in old town temecula, then you need to make more 8/14/2020 3:39 PM parking garages or more available parking. It is extremely irritating to live in old town and not be able to park! 137 this is a good effort, thank you 8/13/2020 5:53 PM 138 It's ok to embrace slow growth 8/12/2020 9:58 AM 139 Not at this time. 8/12/2020 9:18 AM 140 Any plan must address the ingress and egress of commuters on 1-15. If the City isn't able to 8/12/2020 8:14 AM make changes to the freeway congestion, they shouldn't be adding to it with new housing. 141 We need very affordable housing and temporary, emergency housing to help the homeless 8/12/2020 6:15 AM 142 End better access to the freeway 8/11/2020 9:53 PM 143 Currently we need less housing and more commercial businesses like restaurants. Especially 8/11/2020 8:32 PM on Temecula parkway which lacks family friendly sit down restaurants. 144 Not a nimby but I would like any homeless to be directed away from public traffic. The duck 8/11/2020 5:54 PM pond has been an issue. 145 Allowing short term rentals within the city of temecula should be a priority for the city council. 8/11/2020 3:58 PM It helps improve tourism and allows home owners to create extra income and coup with the high cost of living Found in Temecula. 146 Would like to see either rents or mortgages at affordable rates for single mothers, single 8/11/2020 1:47 PM persons that can be able to affordable on single income. 147 As a special needs teacher in Temecula, my concern is two -fold: personal and professional. 8/10/2020 2:30 PM Personally, there are not options for a single teacher income for housing in Temecula. I don't qualify for low income housing and the regular prices of homes are too expensive, but I want to live in the community I work in. Unfortunately, this situation is pushing me to purchase further away from Temecula as I watch new homes being built in the $500K range around town. I would love to have an opportunity to stay in Temecula where my children grew up. Professionally, the students I serve are 18-22yo and many of them move out of the area to seek housing in areas who support the special needs community. Many of our families move here because of our special needs program in schools, but then what happens once they become adults? We need to continue to support them by offering more accessible home options for individuals with special needs that are close to public transit and the community needs (i.e. shopping, doctors, etc.). Our special needs population in Temecula continues to grow and we continue to support them as best we can, but we can do better by thinking long term. 148 You have no where for the homeless to get shelter or a place they can shower and eat hot food 8/10/2020 2:23 PM you really need to figure out how to help them. I think you should build or use an empty building to place the homeless and allow them to stay for a period of time to allow them to either get on their feet or place them in an apartment that they can afford. 149 Please oppose any state bills that take away single-family zoning, especially in these 8/10/2020 11:02 AM pandemic times. We need more open space, not less! 150 Temecula is over -crowded. The infrastructure cannot handle the population. We do not need 8/10/2020 7:20 AM any new housing to be built. It will only add to the congestion. 151 Adding ADU 's to existing homes create off street parking problems with streets lines with 8/9/2020 9:43 PM cars. 152 Working through city permit process for an ADU and it is arduous. So far the city is not being 8/9/2020 5:09 PM helpful and is quite disappointing. 153 More open space/parks/hiking trails/Agriculture. Would like to see more dedicated bike trails. 8/9/2020 1:14 PM Less high density - leads to more traffic and less happiness. 154 It takes too long to build and govt fees are contributing factor in increase costs. Stop cherry 8/9/2020 10:17 AM picking your friends. Why does Corona Family seek to rezone their property for Residential, but sue/demand EIR for adjacent housing tract on BFS and Tern Pkwy. The politics of valley are damaging the community. 48/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 155 No 8/8/2020 10:02 PM 156 All homes/apartments must be for homeowners or long term renters. No short term rentals as 8/8/2020 3:14 PM they take away from the infrastructure of Temecula. 157 We love Temecula. Please maintain quality of life and keep the area "low crime.". The only 8/8/2020 1:17 PM drawback is California leftest politics and primarily a single party state which may drive us out of the state 158 We have plenty of apartments - There is a lack of single story single family homes. 8/8/2020 9:21 AM 159 N/a 8/7/2020 10:38 PM 160 No more housing!! 8/7/2020 9:28 PM 161 No 8/7/2020 1:17 PM 162 1 think seniors need affordable housing most in this area. There are plenty of rentals for 8/7/2020 8:24 AM younger people. 163 More one story housing needed for us getting closer to empty nesting and seniors and for 8/7/2020 4:46 AM young families starting out. Affordable. Program fo make it more affordable. Homeless -hell support programs to get homeless off the street and into housing and also a program that San Diego has- a free bus ticket home if it can be verified they have friend or family who will house them at that location. 164 My hope is that the City will continue to develop Temecula's remaining land carefully as we 8/6/2020 5:34 PM approach build -out, with an eye for quality (at every price point) and inclusion. 165 Homeowners who are about to retire but cannot afford their homes need a nice choice of low 8/6/2020 4:29 PM income homes. Families who make under 50,000k need places to afford. 166 Please help with housing affordability. 8/6/2020 4:11 PM 167 Please keep some open spaces , so far this is a unique aspect to Temecula's relaxed and 8/6/2020 12:20 PM tourist environment. 168 Nothing additional 8/6/2020 8:19 AM 169 The traffic is already highly congested, creating not only pollution and safety issues- but 8/6/2020 8:17 AM concerns about expansion. Temecula needs to stop building before it becomes unrecognizable. With heavy traffic, people become agitated and stressed, and that is when it becomes dangerous for bikers, pedestrians, and we see higher amounts of traffic accidents. Let's keep Temecula safe and preserve the beauty 170 1 feel that developers will build homes that they can sell. So demand will encourage the 8/6/2020 7:44 AM construction of whatever homes are needed. 171 More mixed use so shopping isn't only at each end of town 8/5/2020 8:57 PM 172 We need to make sure the infrastructure is in place prior to building more housing. The traffic 8/5/2020 8:51 PM is one of the biggest negatives to our city, and I think that is fueled by the continued development without the infrastructure to support it. I do appreciate all the projects that are in the works on the freeway but the side streets are just as bad 173 Not every family has a dual income or high income. But those families live and work in 8/5/2020 2:51 PM Temecula and would like to buy a home. Think about the people who are different then you. 174 Please, no more apartments and limit the number of new housing developments 8/5/2020 2:18 PM 175 M 8/5/2020 2:10 PM 176 There needs to be more bike trails that enable people to ride a bike anywhere they want to go 8/5/2020 1:22 PM including the wineries and old town 177 Please no more massive developments of single family homes! 8/5/2020 12:08 PM 178 Not at this time 8/5/2020 10:47 AM 179 We should be promoting diversity of our community and providing more affordable housing. 8/5/2020 10:19 AM 180 There are too many homes in Temecula. Let's focus on our schools which have seemed to go 8/5/2020 10:06 AM 49/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey down the past few years. 181 Please do not build anymore housing, at least right now. Communities that grow too fast fall 8/5/2020 10:05 AM fast and I do not want that for Temecula 182 If you're going to build anymore new housing, PLEASE require larger backyards and houses 8/4/2020 5:04 PM that are further apart from each other. 183 Slow the growth - it's great where it is and will not be great if it keeps growing 8/4/2020 12:35 PM 184 I chose the French Valley area rather then Temecula because I got more bang for my buck. 1 8/4/2020 7:42 AM got a larger nicer house for a lot less and my taxes were lower. 185 Building new houses without upgrading and connecting existing roads, better freeway access 8/4/2020 3:23 AM and new thoroughfares will increase the traffic, which already is a miserable situation. It might just be what makes us move away from our beloved city of 27 years. 186 Homes are so overpriced including inflation of mortgages and property taxes. Would be nice to 8/4/2020 1:05 AM have a few homes that can be considered starter homes that are not in the high $300k. 187 No 8/3/2020 8:14 PM 188 If the city continues to build affordable housing in temecula, the city will go down hill and end 8/3/2020 5:55 PM up just like Riverside. 189 New single detached homes that are less than $500k and with an actual front / back yard for 8/3/2020 5:55 PM our kids to grow up don't exist. Right now my family is forced to pay over $600k for a new house within the Temecula School system, or $500k for a house that's even close to a very basic 2,000sgft floor plan. Otherwise, we are stuck with condos plagued with $300 HOAs (Rancho Soleo) and no parking. My family and I make over $130k without including any overtime at our jobs and we are forced to buy a very used 2006 house stuck in a neighborhood where each house is less than 10 feet apart. We have no privacy. How is this possible? 190 Please deal with traffic before every empty lot of land is developed with new houses. Amount 8/3/2020 5:20 PM of Houses on butterfield is crazy. When kids graduate we are out of here 191 Stop building and over crowding Temecula!! The traffic and amount of people here is awful!! 8/3/2020 3:24 PM 192 Please keep temecula a beautiful safe city . Please don't make it city like (busy) w a lot of 8/3/2020 2:45 PM apartments 193 Stop building master planes tract homes on 1/3 acre each and build some mixed use housing! 8/2/2020 5:25 PM The city has known they're deficient in housing for low to middle income earners for 10 years - do something about it already!! 194 Need more long term buyer attractive neighborhoods -that is, houses that have space between 8/2/2020 2:11 PM them and aren't shoved up right next to each other. 195 affordable single story housing that is not in the 55 and older community so that adults can 8/2/2020 1:09 PM share housing with young adult children 196 The city needs more affordable housing options 8/2/2020 12:14 PM 197 No thanks 8/2/2020 11:09 AM 198 1 think the new housing projects are moving too quickly, without concern for our roads & 8/2/2020 10:58 AM highways, which are in horrific condition. I have been trying for over a year to get SOMEONE to take responsibility for a 2-mile section of Pauba Rd., where this road (not a county owned road), is a "2-mile accident waiting to happen". Everyone I have talked to, has passed the buck! The government of Temecula is doing a lousy job, with representation being the major problem. Haven't been able to read the housing update; but you put it in the middle of this questionnaire, which doesn't make sense. We need better governance in Temecula. Too many representatives continue to be elected, yet do NOTHING to help Temecula prosper, just taking salaries & sitting on their duffs! 199 Would love to see more shelters especially for families. Also we need to see transitional 8/2/2020 9:37 AM housing for individuals with addiction and mental health issues. See too many homeless on the streetcar living in their cars on a daily basis. An increase in affordable housing for working people. Cannot gauge them with rent. Has to align with what the minimum wage is allowing them to spend. 50 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 200 There needs to be affordable housing in Temecula. It is not right to have your current grocery 8/2/2020 8:55 AM store workers working at a location near you but have no place for them to live in that city. 201 Clean up our dry creeks and rid them from trash and homelessness 8/1/2020 10:54 AM 202 1 understand that the City of Temecula is a family town and that is fantastic. However, it 8/1/2020 9:52 AM seems like Temecula has focused on creating very large 2 story houses for families. I believe Temecula needs to have smaller detached single family homes available. Not all families need or can afford such large homes. Smaller 3 bed two bath home at 1500-1800 square feet should be available. Additionally, the city should also consider adding in more condominiums. Thank you. 203 In five to eight years will be looking to downsize to a senior community seems most are in 8/1/2020 8:11 AM Murrietta. But prefer to live in Temecula 204 More affordable 55 and over homes are needed in Temecula 8/1/2020 6:57 AM 205 The cost of housing lacks diversity. There are no single family detached rental homes priced at 7/31/2020 7:24 PM appropriate levels for middle to low income families. 206 Please do NOT repeal prop 13 & raise property taxes even higher ! Please provide more 7/31/2020 5:59 PM affordable housing for young folks ages 20-40 working in Temecula who cannot afford to rent apartment of their own. Thank You 207 Keep a clean, friendly and safe community for all to enjoy 7/31/2020 5:46 PM 208 We definitely don't need any more apartments or condominiums. Traffic is terrible in our area. 1 7/31/2020 5:20 PM would also love to see more wide-open space type of parks. 209 The greatness of Temecula is its small size, quality of life and semi -rural character. Don't keep 7/31/2020 5:01 PM growing it with more housing! Then it turns into an urban center and I move away! 210 The city's zoning ordinance is designed to prevent the construction of inexpensive multifamily 7/31/2020 4:49 PM housing. This means that living in Temecula is going to continue to become more expensive than it already is. 211 Homeless shelters are definitely more needed now more than ever as well as keeping a 7/31/2020 3:50 PM balance of nature and not building more homes that people can't afford. 212 Really tired of rows and rows of cookie cutter homes! Get creative and sustainable! 7/31/2020 2:59 PM 213 The build out of Temecula has already exceeded the original plans. The lack of mass transit or 7/31/2020 2:54 PM additional freeway lanes means NO MORE HOUSING!!!!!!!!!! 214 I'd like priority for affordable active senior resident- owned housing - senior mobile home parks 7/31/2020 2:43 PM and 55+ resident owned homes. Resident owned mobile home space, not rented land space. And senior communities similar to The Colony in Murrieta, and The Knolls mobile home park in Murrieta. Not apartments - houses or mobile homes. 215 The other part of the housing equation is the job market —living in Temecula is less appealing 7/31/2020 2:17 PM when you have to drive an hour to find career -track jobs for college educated individuals outside of the retail/hospitality/tourism industries. 216 Don't over build!!! 7/31/2020 12:12 PM 217 -Limit STR's -Limit ADW's to those with onsite parking. 7/31/2020 11:49 AM 218 It would be nice to have additional new single family homes for the influx of new residents, but 7/31/2020 11:09 AM it needs to be paired with continued improvement to infrastructure and roads. 219 Please don't turn our city into an area of dispear . Don't allow homeless to over take the area 7/31/2020 9:38 AM as they are already doing to our shopping centers. Give owners options of rental property and Airbnb . 220 Let's continue to keep temecula clean and nice , keep homeless off the streets.find a solution 7/31/2020 9:26 AM for the people who protest at the duck pond . Was driving by with my kids and two people were fighting yelling and cussing at each other . NOT GOOD 221 Please no more building! Traffic is already out of control. 7/31/2020 8:02 AM 222 1 worry about how many new builds are going in well East of the 15 without developing anything 7/31/2020 6:47 AM 51/76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey that will ease the strain they will put on working families traveling to jobs. The housing I see most often targets young families due to large home sizes, which assumes more than likely two working parents. That's two more cars on the road. As someone who lives between a lot of these new builds and the freeway access, I worry that a difficult commute will become seriously worse as time progresses. I take some responsibility as I too commute to SD County for work, but only to Fallbrook, so about as close to Temecula as you can get. Most days I need to plan an hour for a drive that should take 25 minutes and the writing on the wall says it's only going to get more congested with the addition of neighborhoods like Sommers Bend when there isn't a reasonable alternative for getting north or south. 223 Housing/ rent pricing caused by investors buying up property in bulk and renting out. It's 7/30/2020 11:20 PM driving up costs and lowering the quality of inventory. 224 no 7/30/2020 10:33 PM 225 There are ppl who work really hard to provide a nice and safe environment for their families 7/30/2020 9:19 PM even when they can barely afford to. I work two jobs and it's still not enough. If I work here I should be able to live comfortably without having to stress about being a good parent or a working single mom who tries everything possible to put in quality time to produce a productive citizen while working 12-16 hours days sometimes 7 days a week. 226 People who work in Temecula should be able to live in Temecula. New housing projects should 7/30/2020 8:55 PM have lower -income subsidies so they can own as well. 227 Stop building. Buy land and turn it into parks. The problem is the Jeni is already out of the bag 7/30/2020 7:25 PM for Temecula. Traffic and crime are here to stay 228 We need more affordable housing options for lower income families 7/30/2020 7:18 PM 229 As someone who works in a position that often interacts with the homeless population in this 7/30/2020 7:08 PM city, I can firmly say that this city desperately needs to address homelessness in Temecula better and with more respect. Many homeless patrons that I have heard from say that they do not feel that there is nearly enough city resources to help support them and get them back on their feet. They also often complain that they don't feel respected, seen, or heard by the city and that is a major issue that Temecula needs to grapple with. Redirecting that funding toward social resources and programs would make a tremendous difference in our community. Also, the cost of housing (rent, buying a house, etc.) is FAR too high in this area. Neither I or my boyfriend would be able to afford our rent and living expenses on a monthly basis if one of us lost our income for any reason, and we live in what is considered one of the "cheapest" apartments in the city). This is a terrifying concern that needs to be promptly addressed, especially considering the hardships brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thankfully my boyfriend and I have been getting our steady income during this time but we were initially horrified at the start of all of this when we were unsure if we'd be keeping our jobs and be getting paid during this trying time. 230 There should be a housing program in the market for couples, without "forcing" them to live in 7/30/2020 6:10 PM a house with 3-4 rooms when they need just 1-2. 231 1 would like to be able to afford to live. 7/30/2020 6:08 PM 232 As a single mother I can say it's almost impossible for me to find something in Temecula 7/30/2020 5:51 PM where I would feel safe raising my son. It's daunting to feel that way. 233 1 have worked in Temecula for 10 years but cannot afford to live in this city. I am a single 7/30/2020 5:43 PM mother of 3 with a good paying job. I would benefit from an affordable housing element. I contribute to this city and should be able to live here as well. 234 1 accepted a job in Temecula at the beginning of the year and moved here for it. Then, we all 7/30/2020 5:10 PM were hit with Covid-19. I am highly interested in understanding the real estate market in the area as that I've noticed many homes going on MLS; I'm interested in as to why so many homes for sale. 235 Current infrastructure is strained to meet current housing levels. After watching Los Angeles 7/30/2020 5:09 PM and Orange Counties basically negatively impact the quality of life by overbuilding, the main reason for our move to Temecula was a better quality of life with limited growth at the time. Since moving here, we have seen the population growth negatively impact quality of life but from an economic view, it has been a positive. The challenge is to balance the growth while maintaining quality. 52 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 236 We love Temecula! However it is way too populated and too many residences being built. The 7/30/2020 5:09 PM infrastructure cannot handle what we have now! Very frustrating. All we hear are sirens anymore from emergency and/or police. It's sad when you live w miles from somewhere and it takes 15 to 20 minutes to get there. Stop building. There is enough population and tourist business to sustain the city. 237 We need less housing developments! Especially ones where the homes are so so close 7/30/2020 4:57 PM together with no yard. 238 Think about single mothers, lower income essential employees and the children whom are part 7/30/2020 4:33 PM of those families. This isn't about handouts, it's about the need for smaller practical homeownership options. 239 My son and his new wife wanted to move here from college in Irvine, but the one condo we 7/30/2020 3:49 PM found in their price range got 16 offers on it the first day. They were very discouraged at the lack of options, and will continue renting for the foreseeable future. 240 We need affordable single family homes for people who work blue collar jobs and low -paying 7/30/2020 3:20 PM white collar jobs in Temecula 241 The city of Temecula needs to work to create nice homes and neighborhoods for low income 7/30/2020 2:58 PM essential workers who work in Temecula. The apartments currently affordable to Temecula's low income earners are horribly inadequate. Stop building half a million+ $$ single family neighborhoods and think about our low income residents. 242 I'm currently renting and taking amenities away it's frustrating because of COVID 19,1 pay a lot 7/30/2020 2:42 PM of money for renting. 243 Smaller starter homes instead of McMansions are needed 7/30/2020 2:36 PM 244 Building AFFORDABLE Housing for all age groups and particularly for those who work in the 7/30/2020 2:35 PM service industries. Today's housing market is expensive and prejudicial. 245 Please open more affordable low income senior housing . 7/30/2020 2:28 PM 246 Not just low income, up and coming income. Kids who grew up here need to get a foothold in 7/30/2020 1:39 PM or near the community 247 No 7/30/2020 1:37 PM 248 1 have lived here since the 80's. I will most likely not be able to stay here in retirement due to 7/30/2020 1:36 PM housing costs (and lack of physicians). This is not a senior friendly town unless one is very well off. 249 Coming from an undesirable neighborhood before moving to Temecula , I worry bringing more 7/30/2020 1:30 PM apartments or " lower income" housing will devalue our neighborhood and bring in more crime. I saved and bought my home here because the city was safe and clean, I am concerned it will become more in lines of where I moved away from if more apartments and condos are built 250 Stop building apartments, condos and HUD housing. GET RID OF THE DRUG ADDICTS 7/30/2020 1:18 PM LIVING ON OUR STREETS. I'll take my tax money elsewhere. 251 Yes, please stop building homes. There is nothing attractive about a community with endless 7/30/2020 12:23 PM neighborhoods of cookie -cutter homes. The northern Inland Empire region is an example of the crime and pollution increase that results from not leaving any open space for recreation, parks, etc. Despite Temecula having several public amenities, there is a significant lack of public trails systems - I'm not talking about dirt paths through cookie -cutter neighborhoods - I'm talking about trail systems like Meadowview, or those in open, natural spaces that give our community members a sense of connection to nature. My family is currently not purchasing a home in Temecula because we are waiting to see if the City continues to flood every open space with a development, or if they change their approach to develop a balance community. Rehabilitate existing shopping centers, create consistency in building architecture, improve trail systems and stop thinking that growth is the only way to run a City. As a Civil Engineer, I am extremely troubled by the fact that City's do not understand the negative impact of growth to local pollution, congested roadways and natural open spaces. Increased tax revenue from residential housing is not valuable long-term to a community. Temecula is literally the last haven in the IE, and it looks like it will be a pain to live in at the current rate of growth. Improve local businesses to stimulate your economy to truly make this a tourist destination. Please!!! 53 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 252 1 am very, very concerned about the rash of bills coming from Sacramento that push upzoning 6/8/2020 11:25 AM and high -density housing on all communities in the state. Please resist these bills with every tool you have. Nobody wants their existing neighborhood upended. Local cities should be able to decide for themselves the type of housing they need and allow. 253 Temecula does not need any more single family detached homes. There are plenty of single 6/2/2020 4:41 PM family homes. 254 The NUMBER #1 concern is traffic on the freeway. Before any more units are built, the State 5/28/2020 10:43 AM needs to adequately fund infrastructure in the area. The area has grown tons in the last 30 years. Before more units are built, we need infrastructure. Also, the state should not tell cities that they must build more units, or change zoning. It is called local government for a reason. Sacramento needs to stop over ruling the wishes of communities. 255 no 4/14/2020 3:32 PM 54 / 76 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q16 If desired, please leave your name and email address to receive email updates, meeting announcements, and information on the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update. Note: Emails will solely be used for the purpose of dispersing information related to the Housing Element Update and will not be shared or used for any other purpose. Answered:244 Skipped:618 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES First Name: 98.36% 240 Last Name: 96.72% 236 Email: 97.13% 237 Note: Answers redacted for privacy. 55 / 76 Appendix C- Part 1 Q1 Do you live and/or work in the City of Temecula? Answered:644 Skipped:55 Q6: Own Q6: Rent QE othe Q6: Live in Temecula SWorkinTemecula 0 Live AND work in Temecula Retired in Temecula LIVE IN WORK IN LIVE AND WORK IN RETIRED IN TOTAL TEMECULA TEMECULA TEMECULA TEMECULA Q6: Own (A) 29.37% 0.000/0 47.08% 23.54% 71.89% 136 0 218 109 463 Q6: Rent (B) 24.05% 0.000/0 53.16% 22.78% 24.53% 38 0 84 36 158 Q6: Live with other household (Neither own nor 27.27% 0.00% 50.00% 22.73% 3.42% rent) (C) 6 0 11 5 22 Q6: Currently homeless (D) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.16% 0 0 0 1 1 Total Respondents 180 0 313 151 644 IF YOU LIVE SOMEWHERE OTHER THAN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, WHERE DO YOU TOTAL LIVE? Q6: Own (A) 0 0 Q6: Rent (B) 0 0 Q6: Live with other household (Neither own nor rent) 0 0 (C) Q6: Currently homeless (D) 0 0 1/57 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey # Q6:OWN DATE 1 Murrieta 9/16/2020 9:32 AM 2 Murrieta 9/16/2020 9:21 AM 3 unincorporated county/retired 9/16/2020 9:10 AM 4 Murrieta 9/15/2020 2:08 PM 5 Murrieta 9/15/2020 11:29 AM 6 San Diego own two rentals in Temecula 9/5/2020 3:28 PM 7 Wildomar 9/4/2020 3:33 PM 8 Murrieta 9/4/2020 3:05 PM 9 Murrieta 9/4/2020 3:05 PM 10 Winchester 8/31/2020 6:22 PM 11 Winchester, CA 8/31/2020 7:31 AM 12 Wildomar 8/31/2020 12:13 AM 13 Fallbrook 8/29/2020 9:10 AM 14 Outside of wine country Winchester 8/28/2020 9:35 PM 15 Temecula in Wine County 8/28/2020 9:32 PM 16 1 live in the Wine Country unincorporated area 8/28/2020 1:58 PM 17 Menifee 8/28/2020 1:56 PM 18 Menifee 8/28/2020 1:50 PM 19 1 am filling this out for my parents who are retired. 8/28/2020 1:43 PM 20 Menifee. I am always down in Temecula, originally wanted to live there. 8/28/2020 1:29 PM 21 Murrieta 8/28/2020 1:12 PM 22 Murrieta 8/28/2020 1:07 PM 23 Murrieta 8/24/2020 1:09 PM 24 French Valley 8/17/2020 11:06 AM 25 We just moved away 8/12/2020 9:17 AM 26 Murrieta 8/10/2020 7:15 AM 27 Lived in Temecula for years and may move back -have many friends there so my info is relevant. 8/7/2020 4:40 AM 28 Fallbrook 8/6/2020 11:42 PM 29 Winchester, CA 8/6/2020 8:43 AM 30 1 live in Temecula, partly telecommute and partly work within 40 minutes of here 8/5/2020 8:46 PM 31 Lake Elsinore 8/3/2020 6:13 PM 32 TEMECULA WINE COUNTRY 8/3/20204:31 PM 33 Riverside 8/3/20204:07 PM 34 San Juan Capistrano 8/2/2020 11:05 AM 35 Meadowview 7/31/2020 2:10 PM 36 Just outside of city limits toward wine country 7/31/2020 7:56 AM 37 Murrieta 7/30/2020 5:49 PM 38 Near Pachanga 7/30/2020 5:19 PM 39 Riverside County -Wine Country 7/30/2020 2:32 PM 2/57 # Q6: RENT 1 Hemet 2 Murrieta 3 Murrieta 4 Moreno Valley 5 Sun City 6 Menifee 7 Riverside 8 Los angeles 9 Menifee 10 1 live in the city of Perris 11 28500 Pujol Street #44 12 Menifee City of Temecula Housing Element Survey DATE 9/16/2020 9:07 AM 9/15/2020 11:43 AM 8/29/2020 11:57 PM 8/29/2020 2:11 PM 8/28/2020 8:21 PM 8/28/2020 6:36 PM 13 1 would like to move to the city of Temecula 14 Murrieta 15 Murrieta 16 Menifee 17 Murrieta 18 Menifee 19 1 am in the process is moving to Temecula from San Diego 20 Anza # Q6: LIVE WITH OTHER HOUSEHOLD (NEITHER OWN NOR RENT) 1 Perris 2 San Diego 3 Santa Clara # Q6: CURRENTLY HOMELESS 1 Menifee 8/28/2020 5:26 PM 8/28/2020 3:52 PM 8/28/2020 1:28 PM 8/28/2020 1:24 PM 8/28/2020 1:19 PM 8/28/2020 1:14 PM 8/28/2020 1:08 PM 8/17/2020 8:17 PM 8/2/2020 2:06 PM 8/1/2020 6:50 AM 7/30/2020 6:05 PM 7/30/2020 6:03 PM 7/30/2020 1:08 PM 5/18/2020 8:46 AM DATE 8/28/2020 1:31 PM 8/22/2020 6:56 AM 7/29/2020 1:55 PM DATE 7/30/2020 8:34 PM 3/57 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey QE othe Q6: Q6: Own (A) Q6: Rent (B) Q2 How long have you lived in the City of Temecula? Answered: 690 Skipped: 9 Q6: Own 9.8°° 1.97°° 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0 0-2 Years 2-5 Years 5-10 Years 10 + Years 0-2 YEARS 25 YEARS 5-10 YEARS 10 + YEARS TOTAL 9.13% 11.97% 14.60% 64.30% 71.45% 45 59 72 317 493 B B B B 18.13% 19.30% 21.05% 41.52% 24.78% 31 33 36 71 171 A A A A Q6: Live with other household (Neither own nor rent) (C) 29.17% 8.33% 8.33% 54.17% 7 2 2 13 Q6: Currently homeless (D) Total Respondents 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 1 0 0 1 84 94 110 402 24 0.29% 2 690 4/57 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q3 Which of the following housing upgrades or expansions have you considered making on your home? Answered:683 Skipped:16 Q6: Own 0 8 148 69 6 56 78 89 Q6: Rent Q6: Live other hou. Q6: Currently 2 homeless 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Room addition 0 Roofing 0 HVAC 0 Painting E Solar Accessory Dwelling unit 0 Does not apply. 0 other (please specify) ROOM ROOFING HVAC PAINTING SOLAR ACCESSORY DOES OTHER TOTAL ADDITION DWELLING NOT (PLEASE UNIT APPLY. SPECIFY) Q6: Own (A) 14.31% 16.77% 30.27% 55.01% 35.99% 11.45% 15.95% 18.20% 141.73% 70 82 148 269 176 56 78 89 968 B B B B B B B Q6: Rent (B) 3.59% 1.80% 2.99% 10.18% 7.19% 1.20% 79.64% 5.99% 27.53% 6 3 5 17 12 2 133 10 188 A A A A A A A Q6: Live with other household 4.00% 4.00% 0.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 68.00% 16.00% 4.25% (Neither own nor rent) (C) 1 1 0 2 2 2 17 4 29 Q6: Currently homeless (D) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Total Respondents 77 86 153 288 190 60 230 103 683 5/57 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey # Q6:OWN DATE 1 Flooring 9/24/2020 6:56 PM 2 Lawn upgrade to drought tolerant rock 9/19/2020 12:13 PM 3 Flooring, plumbing, electrical 9/16/2020 9:27 AM 4 Flooring, plumbing, electrical 9/16/2020 8:56 AM 5 new flooring, landscaping 9/15/2020 10:18 AM 6 repair support beam in garage 9/15/2020 9:58 AM 7 Kitchen and bathroom upgrades replace fencing 9/6/2020 2:54 PM 8 LANDSCAPING..plumbing, windows etc.. 9/5/2020 1:03 PM 9 all ready done 9/5/2020 8:46 AM 10 Whole house fan in the attic 9/5/2020 7:08 AM 11 Pool 9/4/2020 3:41 PM 12 Kitchen, bath, landscaping 9/4/2020 3:30 PM 13 Flooring 9/4/2020 3:25 PM 14 pool 9/4/2020 3:05 PM 15 Whole house fan 8/31/2020 4:27 PM 16 Installation and soundproofing 8/31/2020 1:12 PM 17 Tankless water heater & new windows 8/30/2020 10:34 PM 18 Windows. Interior doors. 8/30/2020 9:53 PM 19 Windows 8/30/2020 4:15 PM 20 Upgrading bathrooms 8/30/2020 8:44 AM 21 Water heater 8/29/2020 8:41 PM 22 Pool 8/29/2020 4:44 PM 23 Fencing 8/29/2020 2:54 PM 24 Renovate/upgrade 8/29/2020 9:00 AM 25 Windows and kitchen 8/29/2020 12:22 AM 26 Driveway 8/28/2020 9:34 PM 27 Energy efficient appliances 8/28/2020 7:31 PM 28 Pool equipment, plumbing, appliances. 8/28/2020 6:40 PM 29 Landscaping 8/28/2020 6:07 PM 30 New flooring and upgraded bathrooms 8/28/2020 5:50 PM 31 Major Interior Remodel 8/28/2020 3:05 PM 32 Did an addition considering others. 8/28/2020 1:53 PM 33 Air purifier systems 8/28/2020 1:52 PM 34 Making the stairs from the front and back door a ramp. 8/28/2020 1:46 PM 35 All of the above have been done during my time here 8/28/2020 1:40 PM 36 Tree removal/ service 8/28/2020 2:28 AM 37 Remodel interior 8/27/2020 7:13 PM 38 Water Heater, bathroom remodel, new floors 8/27/2020 5:54 PM 39 A bunch of stuff 8/27/2020 1:52 PM 40 Cracks on walls 8/26/2020 7:59 PM 41 Kitchen and bathroom remodel, carpet and other flooring 8/26/2020 6:05 PM 42 Kitchen upgrade 8/24/2020 10:05 AM 43 Updating our whole home 8/21/2020 1:06 PM 44 rain gutter, patio cover and land scaping 8/21/2020 11:46 AM 45 New flooring and kitchen renewal 8/19/2020 1:35 PM 46 Remodeling staircase 8/19/2020 12:05 PM 47 flooring 8/19/2020 9:55 AM 48 1 also need to be able to rent two of my rooms out to people here on vacation to help me pay for my mortgage. I'm 8/19/2020 9:29 AM a single mom, but I can't do that right now because the city stopped letting us 49 pool & landscaping 8/17/2020 11:07 AM 50 bathroom remodel, whole house fan 8/15/2020 12:51 AM 51 Interior Remodeling of Bathrooms/ Upgrade Floors 8/12/2020 4:29 PM 52 Pool 8/11/2020 3:52 PM 53 Patio cover 8/10/2020 10:59 AM 6/57 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey 54 Remodel kitchen 55 Add another garage 56 Kitchen remodel 57 Pool 58 Want single story. 59 interior remodeling 60 New windows. 61 Garage 62 Pool remodel 63 Interior remodel 64 Garage door replacement/garage reno 65 Windows, doors 66 Windows 67 Pool/spa 68 Kitchen and bathroom upgrades 69 Pool 70 Kitchen remodel 71 New flooring and countertops 72 Pool 73 Full renovations 74 pool; remodel; flooring 75 Bathroom remodel 76 Downsize 77 Pool 78 Bathroom upgrades 79 Driveway expansion 80 Patio Cover 81 General interior updates due to age of home 82 Kitchen and bathroom renovations 83 Pool 84 Bathtub install downstairs 85 Kitchen & bathroom renovation 86 Pool and landscaping. 87 Patio cover 88 Flooring, window coverings, patio cover 89 General replacement of outdated aspects of our home # Q6: RENT 1 Pool 2 Windows 3 Shelves in the kitchen 4 Looking to purchase in temecula 5 Renting but want solar on MF affordable housing Riverbank with SOMAH program 6 1 currently rent, so no additions. 7 Moving to Temecula 8/9/2020 6:39 AM 8/8/2020 6:30 PM 8/8/2020 3:09 PM 8/7/2020 2:18 PM 8/6/2020 9:56 PM 8/6/2020 5:18 PM 8/6/20204:21 PM 8/5/2020 9:44 PM 8/5/2020 12:05 PM 8/5/2020 10:51 AM 8/5/2020 10:43 AM 8/4/2020 12:50 AM 8/3/2020 10:06 PM 8/3/2020 6:17 PM 8/3/2020 5:52 PM 8/3/2020 4:17 PM 8/3/2020 2:42 PM 8/3/2020 1:56 PM 8/3/2020 1:21 PM 8/2/2020 5:23 PM 8/2/2020 5:16 PM 8/2/2020 11:07 AM 7/31/2020 5:48 PM 7/31/2020 5:17 PM 7/31/2020 3:32 PM 7/31/2020 2:05 PM 7/31/2020 8:54 AM 7/31/2020 6:39 AM 7/31/2020 1:13 AM 7/30/2020 10:47 PM 7/30/2020 9:31 PM 7/30/2020 8:09 PM 7/30/2020 5:23 PM 7/30/2020 1:18 PM 6/8/2020 11:14 AM 6/2/2020 4:38 PM DATE 8/31/2020 11:09 AM 8/30/2020 2:53 PM 8/28/2020 8:25 PM 8/28/2020 1:29 PM 8/28/2020 1:21 PM 8/18/2020 138 PM 8/1/2020 6:52 AM 8 1 Rent. It's not affordable for me to buy here although I work and live this community 7/30/2020 9:07 PM 9 I'm a renter. Would love to own. 7/30/2020 2:32 PM 10 None 7/30/2020 1:21 PM # Q6: LIVE WITH OTHER HOUSEHOLD (NEITHER OWN NOR RENT) DATE 1 Additional studio/kitchenette 9/28/2020 4:23 PM 2 I'm renting 9/16/2020 9:13 AM 3 Buying 8/25/2020 7:21 AM 4 1 would like to see aprtment complexes have Solar. I would like to see Temecula stop building anything further. 8/24/2020 5:11 PM # Q6: CURRENTLY HOMELESS DATE There are no responses. 7/57 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey Q4 How would you rate the physical condition of the residence you live in? Answered:695 Skipped:4 Q6: Own 11.27%d 62% :M= Q6: Rent 1 Q6:Live wit 0.00°0 6.00°° 8.00°°8.00°° other househ. Q6: Currently homeless 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Excellent condition Shows signs of deferred maintenance (i.e., peeling paint, chipped stucco, etc.) Needs modest rehabilitation improvements (i.e., new roof, new wood siding, etc.) Needs major upgrades (i.e., new foundation, new plumbing, new electrical, etc.) Other (please specify) EXCELLENT SHOWS SIGNS OF NEEDS MODEST NEEDS MAJOR UPGRADES OTHER TOTAL CONDITION DEFERRED MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION (I.E., NEW FOUNDATION, (PLEASE (I.E., PEELING PAINT, IMPROVEMENTS (I.E., NEW NEW PLUMBING, NEW SPECIFY) CHIPPED STUCCO, ETC.) ROOF, NEW WOOD SIDING, ELECTRICAL, ETC.) ETC.) Q6: Own (A) 39.84% 44.87% 11.27% 2.62% 1.41% 71.51% 198 223 56 13 7 497 B B B Q6: Rent (B) 16.37% 51.46% 15.79% 11.110/0 5.26% 24.60% 28 88 27 19 9 171 A A A Q6: Live with 20.000/b 48.00% 16.00% 8.00% 8.00% 3.60% other household 5 12 4 2 2 25 (Neither own nor rent) (C) Q6: Currently 0.000/0 50.000/0 0.00% 50.00% 0.000/0 0.29% homeless (D) 0 1 0 1 0 2 Total 231 324 87 35 18 695 Respondents # Q6: OWN DATE 1 Good condition- well maintained 9/16/2020 9:11 AM 2 Good condition for a 20+ year old 9/6/2020 2:54 PM 3 Fencing 8/28/2020 3:45 PM 4 Excellent for a 32 year old tract home. 8/26/2020 6:52 PM 5 fence is falling down, hasn't been painted since 1998 so the wood trim is falling apart 8/19/2020 9:29 AM 6 House was well kept modern 8/12/2020 9:19 AM 7 Inside needs upgrades 8/8/2020 3:09 PM 8/57 City of Temecula Housing Element Survey # Q6: RENT DATE 1 Apartment 9/3/2020 6:12 PM 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 I rent an apartment 8/29/2020 11:58 PM Need pest control. Found 2 big dead rat. 8/28/2020 8:25 PM I live in an apartment 8/28/2020 1:40 PM Doesnt apply 8/28/2020 1:09 PM An apt. So maintenance is done by management. 8/19/2020 10:58 PM Apartment in good condition, but aging 8/12/2020 10:57 AM Decent 7/30/2020 9:07 PM Not currently living in Temecula 7/30/2020 1:09 PM Q6: LIVE WITH OTHER HOUSEHOLD (NEITHER OWN NOR RENT) DATE The aprtment I visit in Temecula is way too small and way pricey. Remodlers need to come in and make to or three 8/24/2020 5:11 PM apartment into one. Then, they need to take your over 50 empty commercial buildings and make them i