Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout112304 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE NOVEMBER 23, 2004 — 7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Sections: Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect to such matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate litigation. 2. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property negotiation located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Lane (APN 909-370-002). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency and The AGK Group. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of real property interests. The City/Agency negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O'Grady, and John Meyer. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2004-15 Resolution: No. 2004-114 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Sienna Naggar accompanied by Helen Miller Invocation: Reverend Lance Kerwin Calvary Chapel of Temecula Flag Salute: Councilman Stone ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, Naggar R:\Agenda\112304 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Candlelight Tribute Proclamation Certificate of Appreciation for Darrell Connerton PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 2004; 2.2 Approve the minutes of November 9, 2004. 3 Resolution approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:\Agenda\112304 RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Acceptance of the northerly half -width of Deer Hollow Way into the City -maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 29305-1 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE NORTHERLY HALF -WIDTH OF DEER HOLLOW WAY INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO.29305-1) 5 Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEM) Grant Application for FY 2005-2006 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive and file this report regarding our Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEM) Grant Application for the development of the Temecula Park and Ride Landscape Enhancement Project and authorize the Director of Public Works to forward said application to the California Resources agency; 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE TEMECULA PARK AND RIDE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT 6 Revisions to the Schedule of Authorized Positions RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Schedule of Authorized Positions as amended. Purchase of six City Vehicles RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the purchase of the following vehicles from Paradise Chevrolet: R:\Agenda\112304 • One 2005 - Sedan Impala • One 2005 — SUV Trailblazer $17,457.78 $27,208.87 7.2 Approve the purchase of the following vehicles from Carriage Motor Company: • Two 2005 — 2WD GMC Sierra Pick-up Trucks $17,801.38 (each) • One 2005 —4WD %ton GMC Sierra Pick-up Truck $24,670.95 • One 2005 —1 ton Cargo Van $20,131.67 Appointment to Weed Abatement Appeals Board RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Appoint the Standing Chairs of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and the Community Services Commission to the Weed Abatement Appeals Board. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 04-14 (Temecula Creek Village) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 04-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) ZONING DOCUMENT TO PERMIT THE SALE OF ALCOHOL IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL PLANNING AREA AND OTHER MINOR TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR CLARIFICATION xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AGENCY xxxxxxxxxxx RAAgenda\112304 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2004-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2004-12 CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Stone, Washington PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 9, 2004. PW01-17CSD RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve an agreement with Petra Geotechnical, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $91,015.00 to provide as needed geotechnical, material testing services, and special inspection for the Wolf Creek Sports Complex - Project No. PW01- 17CSD — and authorize the President to execute the agreement; R:Wgenda\112304 2.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the contingency amount of $9,101.00, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. PW04-13 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve an agreement with Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation in an amount not to exceed $114,426.00 to provide professional civil engineering design services for Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 — and authorize the President to execute the agreement; 3.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the contingency amount of $11,442.60, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount; 3.3 Approve the acceleration of funding from the FY2005-06 Capital Improvement Program budget in the amount of $56,000.00 to the FY 2004-05 Capital Improvement Program budget. 4 Ratification of Election Results — Tract Mao No. 26828-1, -2 and Final 5 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL -IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2004, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Accept two Landscape Easement Deeds from property owners within Tract Map No. 19872 adjacent to Pechanga Parkway; 5.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the Landscape Easement Deeds. Wolf Creek Specific Plan — Service Level B. Service Level C. and Service I Rates and Charges RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RAAgenda\112304 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT MAP NOS. 29798 SERIES AND 30264 SERIES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 7 Subcommittee for the Ronald Reagan Sports Park RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Appoint two Board Members to serve on an ad hoc subcommittee to address Issues related to a proposed memorial at the Ronald Reagan Sports Park. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, December 7, 2004, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\112304 /�L #,s+ aaE}R�bs>jg3'y,h";; ----- { `S r� **!r*#Iritk*ifY**}kk!*RRi�f �"' 'r ;� „'tM�ECUt�►*REDE�ELOPME�1�1�3�GE(a�MfiEf�IN'G'� �;"" �"��� r ,�,�" � �.4*R� � x ".. #K � �'. J,•. r�".'Y' L il'Yh=4 i, .t4 ?��� ti"Y i3`w '".. a�p� 7 .i'.:'%.:Y .. .. 6'k. _ il. +F� k `•;.C�.v t. +-.d .'z,� °v. jYL:TM' `.5.`.:s -n" h Y:.s. M. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2004-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2004-10 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar, Stone, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 9, 2004. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, December 7, 2004, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:Wgenda\112304 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. TPFA 2004-01 Resolution: No. TPFA 2004-11 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Mike Naggar ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, Naggar PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Temecula Public Financing Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 9, 2004 TPFA PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Temecula Public Financing Authority before a public Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. R:Wgenda1112304 Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Rorioauoh Ranch) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Continue the public hearing related to the Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) to Tuesday, December 7, 2004, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers located at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT BOARD MEMBERS'REPORTS ADJOURNMENT R:\Agenda\112304 10 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 10 Target Corporation — PA03-0726 — 11 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO ALLOW THE SALES OF BEER AND WINE (TYPE 20 LICENSE) WITHIN AN EXISTING 101,909 SQUARE FOOT TARGET STORE LOCATED AT 19676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.921-320-053 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIN AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02- 0360, 02-0363, 02-0364, 02-0365, AND 04-0540) 11.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:Wgenda\112304 11 RESOLUTION NO.04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMEDNING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) ON 20.2 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND GENERALLY KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02-0360) 11.3 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO.04- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMMENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATIN OF THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) AND REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING AREA 9, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD (PA02-0363) 11.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30719 TO SUBDIVIDE 20.2 ACRES INTO 12 PARCELS, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02- 0365) 11.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0364 — A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 162,860 SQUARE FEET OF COMMECIAL RETAIL SPACE, INCLUDING THREE MAJOR TENANTS, SEVEN PADS, AND A TOTAL OF FOUR DRIVE -THROUGH FACILITIES, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100- 013 11.6 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:1Agenda\112304 12 RESOLTUION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0540 — A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING A TOTAL OF FOUR DRIVE -THROUGH FACILTIES WITHIN A RELATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA02-0364) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 162,860 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL SPACE, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, December 7, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:Wgenda\112304 13 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS «O T N U O A C� F F O N A X �U ^ w oz •Q M y N w � •5 U 3b� i� a ct V U U V N U� U lfji'•�•'1; O Q V i U U ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 26, 2004 The City Council convened in Open Session at 7:00 P.M., on Tuesday, October 26, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: 5 Councilmembers: Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, and Naggar Absent: 0 Councilmembers: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Matthew Fagan. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor John Ruhlman of Life Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was presented by Councilman Roberts. PRESENTATION/PROCLAMATIONS National Immigrants Day Proclamation Accepting the proclamation, "Nick the Greek" thanked the City Council for this proclamation. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Lorena Spencer, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the Old Town Farmer's Market as it is presently constituted. She spoke in opposition to retail businesses operating in direct competition to Old Town Merchants. B. Lori Stone Rubin, Temecula, on behalf of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, thanked the Mayor for being the honorary chair of the "Lee Denim Days," and stated they had doubled the participation because of his leadership. C. Addressing the City Council regarding the extension of North General Kearny in the Meadowview tract, Richard Moriki, Temecula, requested that even though members of the City Council have a conflict on this issue, he asked that this decision not be delayed until after Councilman Stone's replacement has been chosen. D. Ellen Ellish, Temecula, addressed the City Council regarding the extension of North General Kearny, asking that Meadowview be retained as a rural area, by not putting this street through. RAMinutes\102604 1 Councilman Washington asked the City Attorney to address when it would be appropriate to discuss the extension of North General Kearny. City Attorney Thorson explained the two issues, stating the recommendation to extend North General Kearny, came from the General Plan Advisory Committee, and in order for it to go into effect, it must have a public hearing before the Planning Commission and a hearing before the City Council. He also addressed the conflicts of the City Council, both Councilmen Washington and Roberts own property in Meadowview and Councilman Stone lives in close proximity, thereby causing impacts to his property. Mr. Thorson further explained that this issue will not come up prior to the Planning Commission hearings which will take place early next year. At this time, Councilman Stone will not be on the Council. If there is a desire to take action prior to this time frame, Mr. Thorson recommended getting an opinion from Fair Political Practices Commission, on whether this could take place. E. Addressing the City Council and the citizens of Temecula, Brad Snell, Temecula, stated as a Deputy District Attorney in Riverside County, Proposition 66 would release dangerous, repeat criminals into our streets, causing unneeded danger to our citizens. He asked that all those listening vote "no" on Proposition 66. F. Addressing the Council regarding the extension of North General Kearny, Sean Hummel asked that this road not be extended. G. Rosemary Prieke, Temecula, also requested North General Kearny not be extended, due to traffic concerns and the rural nature of the area. H. Also regarding the extension of N. General Kearny, Terry Stute requested this road not be extended due to safety concerns for children in the area, and due to increased traffic. I. Maryann Edwards, Temecula, invited the audience and Council to join her in singing Happy Birthday to Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Comerchero. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilman Washington told the Meadowview residents that they will have the opportunity to voice their opinions regarding North General Kearny at the appropriate time. He also encouraged all Temecula citizens to vote next Tuesday, November 2nd Councilman Roberts requested that the City Attorney get a ruling from the FPPC whether the Council can draw straws to resolve the conflict regarding the North General Kearny extension. City Attorney Thorson answered he will write a letter to the FPPC asking whether the Council could draw straws and resolve this issue prior to Councilman Stone leaving office. Mr. Roberts also reported on his S. Korean trip representing SCAG, showing slides of the progress Seoul has made in a very short period of time regarding transportation and redevelopment. Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero thanked Meadowview residents for speaking regarding the extension of North General Kearny. He clarified that other than a recommendation from a citizen group, there has been no action regarding this issue. RAMinutes\102604 2 Also addressing Lorena Spencer's views on the Farmer's Market, he clarified that the Farmer's Market is a private enterprise, not a City -sponsored event. He stated, however, that the City will sponsor a meeting with the concerned parties to see if a compromise could be reached. Councilman Stone thanked the Meadowview residents for voicing their concerns, and explained there is no conspiracy to open North General Kearny. The General Plan Advisory Committee has been asked to make recommendations regarding the General Plan, however the City Council has the responsibility to make the difficult decisions and to honor commitments made in the past to the residents of Temecula. He also stated the City is currently in litigation with the County of Riverside to address traffic concerns and the needs of the City of Temecula and that he, as the incoming County Supervisor, will act more responsibly to address the needs of residents in this district. Mayor Naggar stated that misinformation is detrimental to the process of amending a General Plan, and further clarified that the Council is addressing many aspects all over the City. He explained that a process was set up, with many people involved, to make recommendations and address needs of the entire City. He explained that the issue of the North General Kearny extension, will not be likely heard until early next year. He stated that this Council has a long- standing commitment to its citizens in upholding their needs and desires. City Attorney Thorson clarified the statement made by Councilman Stone, reporting the lawsuit challenging the County's General Plan, is currently pending, and is based on the County not adequately taking care of traffic problems of southwest Riverside County. CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of October 12, 2004. — Councilman Roberts abstained. Resolution approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RAMinutes\102604 RESOLUTION NO. 04-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Community Service Funding Program RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Review and approve the 2004-05 Community Service Funding Program grants per the attached table outlining the Committee's recommendations of $127,300 to 41 organizations. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0717 — A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 45-FOOT TALL MONO -PALM WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY WITH FOUR OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS PROPOSED AT 31575 ENFIELD LANE, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ENFIELD LANE, APPROXIMATELY 3,200 FEET EAST OF RIVERTON LANE (APN 957-170-012) AND DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0717 Resolution adopting a penalty schedule for the Community Standards Preservation Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RAMinutes\102604 RESOLUTION NO. 04-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A PENALTY SCHEDULE IN SUPPORT OF THE COMMUNITY STANDARDS PRESERVATION ORDINANCE 7 Adoption of Riverside County Operational Multi -Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan LHMP RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN AS REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL DISASTER MITIGATION AND COST REDUCTION ACT OF 2000 8 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping Project No. PW02-20 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping - Project No. PW02-20. Theater Project No. PW02-23 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve an Agency Agreement with the Rancho California Water District pertaining to the two specific parcels of land that comprise the Old Town Temecula Community Theater site (PW02-23) and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement; 9.2 Approve a Water System Grant Deed with Rancho California Water District thereby transferring all rights, title, and interests in specific portions of the water system improvements to be constructed as part of the Old Town Temecula Community Theater - Project No. PW02-23 - to the District and authorize the City Manager to execute the Deed. R:\Minutes\102604 10 Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements —Final Stage— Proiect No PW99-11 CH RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 5 to the existing contract with Road Builders, Inc. in the amount of $1,037,230.00, adding the construction of the downstream segment of the Wolf Valley Creek Channel — Stage 1 — from 900± feet north of Muirfield Drive to Temecula Creek; 10.2 Increase the project contingency and the City Manager's Contract Change Order approval limit by $103,723.00 above the previously approved 10% contingency. 11 Award of Construction Contract for the Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station — Proiect No PW03- 01 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Award a construction contract for the Roripaugh Fire Station — Project No. PW03-01 — to Tovey/Schultz Construction, Inc. in the amount of $3,298,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 11.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $329,800.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 11.3 Accelerate the appropriation of budgeted funds in FY 1005-2006 to FY 2004-2005 in the amount of $3,782,830.00; 11.4 Approve an appropriation of $937,170 for the Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station from Community Facility District (CFD) Reimbursables and County of Riverside Reimbursables; 11.5 Increase estimated revenues for the Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station in the amount of $648,585 for CFD Reimbursables and $288,588 for Riverside County Reimbursables. 11.6 Approve an advance of $815,000 from the General Fund to the Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station. 12 Professional Services Agreement with Vanir Construction Management Inc for RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the agreement with Vanir Construction Management, Inc. to provide professional construction management, material testing, and special inspection services in an amount not to exceed $273,240.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 12.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the contingency amount of $27,300 which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. R:\Minutes\102604 13 RECOMMENDATION 13.1 Enter into a purchase agreement with Margarita Canyon, LLC for Assessor Parcel Nos. 922-210-060, 922-210-061, and 922-210-052. The purchase price is currently under negotiation with the owner of the property. Staff expects the negotiations to be completed prior to the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on October 26, 2004 and within the budget range. Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and Mayor Naggar abstained on Item No. 13. City Attorney Thorson advised that the purchase price will be $7,105,000. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-13. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts abstaining on Item No. 2. Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and Mayor Naggar abstaining on Item No. 13. Mayor Naggar recessed the City Council Meeting at 7:50 P.M. Following the Community Services District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Meetings, Mayor Naggar reconvened the City Council Meeting at 8:02 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING 14 An Appeal of the Plannino Commission's aooroval of PA03-0027 (Conditional Use Permit 4.72 acre lot — continued from the October 12, 2004 City Council meeting RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration; 14.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0027 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0027 TO ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A LATTER DAY SAINTS CHURCH FACILITY CONSISTING OF SANCTUARY, MULTI -PURPOSE ROOM, CLASSROOMS, AND MEETING ROOMS TOTALING 24,287 SQUARE FEET ON A 4.72 ACRE VACANT PARCEL LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD AND 140 FEET WEST OF CORTE VILLOSA ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 955-050-017 RAMinutes\102604 Director of Planning Debbie Ubnoske presented the staff report (of record.) Mayor Naggar announced the public hearing has been previously opened and continued to this date. Rocky Snyder, representing the applicant, agreed to the conditions as set forth by the resolution, and thanked the City Council, especially the subcommittee consisting of Mayor Naggar and Councilman Washington. Rebecca Longo, Temecula, thanked the City Council and subcommittee, for the combined efforts to reach a mutual agreement. Stephen Longo, Temecula, agreed with conditions as set forth, and thanked all parties involved to reach a mutually agreeable solution. Mayor Naggar asked if all the residents have signed the paperwork agreeing to the conditions. Director of Planning Ubnoske said that everyone is in agreement in concept and they are working on obtaining all the needed signatures. Mayor Naggar closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero thanked all members involved for working together successfully to reach agreement. Councilman Washington thanked the representative of the LDS Church for working with the residents to reach this agreement. Councilman Stone congratulated members of the subcommittee and also representatives of the church for working successfully with surrounding neighbors. MOTION: Councilman Washington moved to approve staff recommendation on Item No. 14.1 and 14.2. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. 15 User Fees Revisions RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF CITYWIDE FEES Deputy Building Official Mark Harold, presented the staff report (of record.) Mayor Naggar opened the public hearing. Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Naggar closed the public hearing. R:\Minutes\102604 8 Councilman Washington supported staff recommendation and staffs efforts to modify these fees. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Item No 15. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. 16 Zone Change from L-1 to L-2 (PA02-0372) and Tentative Tract Mal) to create seven residential lots ranging from .5 to .82 acres in lot area (PA02-0371) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 04- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0372, A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-1) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-2), GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, OPPOSITE QUIET MEADOWS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 473 LINEAR FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SANTIAGO ROAD, A 4.57 ACRE PARCEL KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 945-060-006 16.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0371 — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30169 SUBDIVIDING 4.57 GROSS ACRES INTO SEVEN SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, OPPOSITE QUIET MEADOWS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 473 LINEAR FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SANTIAGO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.945-060-00 Principal Planner Hazen presented the staff report (of record.) Councilman Stone asked what the surrounding zoning is of this property. Mr. Hazen answered that the immediate tract to the south is L2, and the surrounding parcels are L1, one -acre minimum. Mr. Stone further asked if this project has been conditioned with infrastructure improvements to the intersection of Santiago and Ynez. Public Works Director Bill Hughes answered there is no condition for off -site improvements to this intersection, explaining that the number of homes is consistent with what was planned for this area. R:\Minutes%102604 Asking about the egress of this project, Councilman Roberts asked if this would be "right -in, right -out' or whether it would have full -turning movements. Public Works Director Hughes answered that the project realigned the road coming from the East, and a good four-way intersection will exist, allowing full -turning movements. Councilman Stone asked why increasing the density would be an asset to the community. Mr. Hazen answered this was considered a transition density and would be consistent with the community. He also explained that this is a part of the newly adopted Interim Chaparral Policy. Deputy City Manager Thornhill further clarified that the density has not changed in this area, only the lot sizes. Clarifying the issue, Mr. Stone explained the Council was addressing the entire Chaparral area, and not specifically this one area. Mayor Naggar opened the public hearing. Larry Markham, Temecula, representing the applicant, emphasized that this is not a General Plan Amendment. It is consistent with the Chaparral Policy Plan, as recommended by the General Plan Committee and the Council. He further explained that the net effect actually cuts the density by going to the gross half -acre density on the remainder of the Chaparral area. The configuration is now at a seven -lot, gated community configuration, with improved alignment to the street for better traffic flow. He clarified that the slope areas, and street frontage will be maintained by a home owners association. In conclusion, Mr. Markam stated the applicant is in support of staff and Commission recommendations. Mayor Naggar asked if this community would be gated. Mr. Markam answered that it is the intent for this to be a private street -gated community. Larry Slusser, Temecula, spoke in support of the subdivision as a near -by resident, and felt this is a reasonable transition, and will be of benefit to the community. Also addressing the issue, as a resident just south of the site, Chris Hermann, Temecula, spoke in support of the proposed development. Ralph E. Neimeyer, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the proposed development, stating he feels it should remain as one -acre lots. He also requested a block wall be installed to surround his property should this project be approved. Paul Tanna, Temecula, read a letter from Steve Liss, an adjacent property owner, in opposition to the change of zone, and requested the minimum one -acre lot size be maintained. Also opposing the zone change, Dianne Tanna, addressed the City Council asking that the current zoning be maintained. Bob Burns, Temecula, also a resident residing on Santiago, spoke in opposition to the proposed zone change. He asked that this area be maintained as one -acre minimum lots. Mayor Naggar closed the public hearing. Councilman Stone stated the Chaparral area is an equestrian area, and the majority of homes are on 2-3 acre lots, with a rural life-style. He expressed his desire to keep the zoning at one - acre minimum lots, due to the surrounding uses. He explained that there is no compelling reason to change the zone to half acre lot sizes. RAMinutes\102604 10 City Attorney Thorson stated the applicant needs the opportunity for rebuttal Larry Markham, representing the applicant, stated he feels this development will provide an amenity to the community by widening the road and providing a quality development. He addressed concerns regarding the surrounding residents, agreeing to a condition for a block wall surrounding abutting resident's properties. He said he feels this project is consistent with the current policy, and concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Councilman Washington stated he feels the applicant is planning a quality development, and questioned whether it would be significantly different whether it is two or three homes. Mayor Naggar stated this issue has been discussed at length over the past year, with it culminating in the development of a policy. He said he feels it is important to stay consistent with the policy, since the developer used this policy to move forward. He agreed that a block wall should be installed surrounding Mr. Neimeyer's property. Councilman Stone expressed his views on this policy, stating it was done with a "broad brush" effect, and that individual cases need to be considered. He expressed his desire to keep this zoning at the large -lot size, to protect the property values of surrounding neighbors. Explaining the Chaparral Policy that was developed, Councilman Comerchero, stated that the gross density of two dwelling units per acre in this area "may" be allowed. Further elaborating, he stated that the intent was to have the ability to make value judgments whether it warranted an increase, based on what amenities the City would derive in exchange for the zone change. He stated he does not feel the developer is providing anything that does not benefit the project itself. Councilman Roberts expressed his concern for keeping the rural nature of the area and his desire to retain the larger lot size zoning. Councilman Washington stated he feels that if all the lots along Ynez were at the lower lot size it would have a better fit for the area. Otherwise, this one differing area doesn't seem to be compatible. He also questioned whether single-family lots go through architectural review. Deputy City Manager Thornhill responded that only sub -divisions go through this type of review. Mayor Naggar expressed concern that if the lots are sold individually, there will be no control over the product being built. Councilmember Stone stated that anyone building homes on these large lots, will be of the caliber that the community will support. He explained that the lots which will be sold at approximately $300,000 a piece will probably support $1 million dollar homes. He responded that custom homes will not want the restrictions of a home owners association. MOTION: Councilman Roberts moved to deny the Zone Change with the accompanying resolution of denial. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone. Further Council discussion ensued. Mayor Naggar asked about the topic of amenities. Mr. Markham stated he would entertain a continuance to discuss what amenities the developer could provide the City where they would feel comfortable approving the project. He said it would have to be something that would be affordable to the developer, and mutually agreed upon. RAMinutes\102604 Mayor Naggar further asked if amenities could not be mutually agreed upon, would the developer like a continuance with the ability to amend the map and bring it back for consideration. Mr. Markham agreed that the applicant would like to do so. City Attorney Thorson clarified that to amend the map, the applicant would have to withdraw the current plan, and essentially start over. Mayor Naggar asked that a two week continuance would be granted to see if amenities could be mutually agreed upon. Councilman Washington asked if the project came back as a four -lot project, would the street alignment be lost. Mr. Hughes stated that even with a four -lot project, Public Works would still insist on the street alignment. Mr. Washington further asked if a continuance is requested, will it be meaningful, or should the denial go forward. Councilman Stone clarified that he could find no compelling reason to approve this higher density and zone change. He said he feels this change is not an appropriate transition to this area, and agrees with surrounding residence. Mayor Naggar stated he feels it is the intent of the Council, if this zone change is denied, that the applicant could amend his map to a four -lot subdivision, without incurring further application costs. Concurrence was reached on this point. Clarifying his intent, Councilman Roberts amended his motion, with Councilman Stone amending his second to the following: MOTION: Councilman Roberts moved to deny the Zone Change and adopt a resolution denying the zone change, and referred the subdivision portion to the Planning Commission to consider a four -lot subdivision. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECESS Mayor Naggar called a recess at 9:35 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:50 P.M. 17 First Extension of Interim Ordinance: Prohibition of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Adopt an ordinance, by a 4/5ths vote, entitled: URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 04-14 AN URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING, CONTINUING, AND EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE CITY City Attorney Thorson presented the staff report (of record.) RAMinutes\102604 12 Mayor Naggar opened the public hearing. Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Naggar closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilman Washington moved to adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 04-14. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. COUNCIL BUSINESS 18 Community Services Commission Appointments RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Appoint two applicants to serve full three-year terms on the Community Services Commission through October 10, 2007. Deputy City Clerk Ballreich presented the staff report (of record.) MOTION: Councilman Washington moved to reappoint Commissioners Henz and Hogan to serve full three-year terms. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. 19 Public Traffic Safety Commission Appointments RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Appoint two applicants to serve full three-year terms on the Public Traffic Safety Commission through October 10, 2007. Deputy City Clerk Ballreich presented the staff report (of record) Robert Wheeler, Murrieta, addressed the Council in support of reappointing Commissioner Darrell Connerton to the Public Traffic Safety Commission. MOTION: Councilman Washington moved to reappoint Paul Jacobs and appoint Tomi Arbogast to serve a full three-year term on the Public Traffic Safety Commission. Mayor Naggar suggested splitting the motions to vote on each candidate separately. Councilman Washington withdrew his motion so this could take place. Councilman Stone spoke in support of reappointing Darrell Connerton, especially in view of the many accomplishments, including his work on "Measure C." He thanked Commissioner Connerton for his unselfish work on this Commission and for the City of Temecula as a whole. MOTION: Mayor Naggar moved to reappoint Paul Jacobs to serve a full three-year term on the Public Traffic Safety Commission. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. RAMinutes\102604 13 MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to reappoint Darrell Connerton to serve a full three- year term on the Public Traffic Safety Commission. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero. Voice vote reflected the motion failed 2-3, with Councilmembers Stone and Comerchero in favor, and Mayor Naggar, and Councilmembers Roberts and Washington in opposition. MOTION: Mayor Naggar moved to appoint Tomi Arbogast to serve a full three-year term on the Public Traffic Safety Commission. The motion was seconded by Councilman Washington. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 20 City Council Meeting Schedule — December 2004 RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Provide direction to the City Clerk to reschedule or cancel a meeting in December 2004, and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements of the Government Code. Deputy City Clerk Ballreich presented the staff report (of record.) MOTION: Councilman Roberts moved to reschedule the December City Council meetings to December 7 and 14, 2004. The motion was seconded by Councilman Washington and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 21 Freeway Bridge Fencing (At the request of Councilman Roberts) RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Provide direction to staff regarding the installation of additional barrier fencing on freeway bridges within the City of Temecula. Councilman Roberts reported he asked for this item to be placed on the agenda, to look at fencing on freeway bridges. He suggested that due to the large amount of traffic utilizing these bridges, the extra funding needed would be well worth the cost. Councilman Washington asked whether the current configuration is in full compliance with Caltrans, and if extra fencing would be over and above current requirements. City Attorney Thorson confirmed this is correct; however the City does have the option to request that Caltrans put in additional fencing. Strongly supporting further analyses by staff, Councilman Comerchero stated his support of extra fencing on freeway bridges. Councilman Stone supported the requested, but further suggested this be brought to the Public Traffic Safety Commission for their input. Mayor Naggar asked what the proper action would be at this point. Public Works Director stated the City has had discussions with Caltrans on the City's options. He explained that Caltrans is in full compliance with their standards, however if the City wishes to entertain further fencing, at the City's costs, that is possible. He further said that engineering will need to be RAMinutes\102604 14 done to determine what options will work, and cost estimates are assuming lengthy Caltrans process which each fence being designed individually. Charity Smith, Temecula, presented the City Council with a petition containing over 450 signatures, in support of additional fencing. She explained that her boyfriend went over the Rancho California Bridge and anything that could be done to help prevent these incidents would be well worth the cost. MOTION: Councilman Roberts moved to explore fencing options, to analyze the bridges, to advise the Public Traffic Safety Commission of options, and to forward a letter to Caltrans. Councilman Stone seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS None given. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Nelson reported the General Plan Workshop scheduled for Thursday, November 4, 2004, in the Council Chambers, will begin at 6:00 P.M. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson reported that with respect to Closed Session Item No. 1, listed on the agenda, and also on the Consent Calendar, Mayor Naggar and Councilman Comerchero did not participate in that discussion. Pertaining to all other Closed Session Items, direction was given to staff. ADJOURNMENT At 10:15 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to a regular meeting on Tuesday, November 9, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CIVIC City Clerk [SEAL] RAMjnutes\102604 15 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 9, 2004 The City Council convened in Open Session at 7:00 P.M., on Tuesday, October 26, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: 4 Councilmembers: Absent: PRELUDE MUSIC Councilmembers: Comerchero, Stone, Washington, and Naggar Roberts The prelude music was provided by Eve Craig. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Minister Felicia Brown of Imani Church of God in Christ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was presented by Boy Scout Troop 337. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Mr. Phil Hoxey, Temecula, read a statement prepared by Mr. Sam Pratt (copies were submitted to the City Council). The statement addressed Mr. Pratt's concern with traffic congestion and his support of a Congestion Management Program. B. Alarmed by the business failure in Old Town, Ms. Lorena Spencer, Temecula, commented on the competition the Farmers' Market has created for the businesses in Old Town and offered the following resolution: that every new business be given the opportunity of a free booth at the market to enable business owners to introduce their businesses and that the remaining Old Town merchant booths be made available to business owners on a rotating basis. C. Commenting on the projected closure of the Temecula Chapter, Mr. J.D. Sander, Murrieta, representing the Workforce Development Center — Experience Unlimited, provided an overview of the services provided by this facility and expressed a hopefulness for the combined efforts of the City Managers and the Mayors of each community to find a resolution in keeping this particular facility open. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. In response to Ms. Spencer's comments, Mayor suggestion as a responsible request but reiterated that the private business — the City does not own it — but that her owners of the Farmers' Market. Pro Tern Comerchero viewed her Farmers' Market in Old Town is a suggestions will be relayed to the RAMinutes\110904 B. Readdressing the Circulation Element in the General Plan and comments received with regard to that issue from Meadowview residents, Councilman Washington informed the public that Councilman Roberts and he have conflicts of interest and will not be participating in the discussion or the decision with regard to North General Kearney. Expressing his respect, appreciation, and gratitude to the past, current, and future veterans, Mr. Washington invited the community to the Veterans' Memorial Dedication on Thursday, November 11, 2004, at 2:00 P.M., at the Duck Pond. C. Having attended the Western Riverside County Council of Governments, Councilman Stone advised that the County is actively collecting the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation fees, noting that interest will be charged if not received in a timely fashion. Due to the costs of concrete and steel, Mr. Stone advised that the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee will be increased by 8% -- not a tax to present residents pay but a tax to new homebuyers to pay for regional infrastructure. Apprising the Council and the public of an unfortunate circumstance with regard to a teenager from Murrieta who was infected with the West Nile Virus, Councilman Stone commented on his recent visit/tour of the Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District in Northwestern Riverside County, noting that the Cities of Temecula and Murrieta are not a part of the Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control to which Assistant to the City Manager Yates noted that the City has contracted with the Riverside County Environmental Health Division and are basically completing the same responsibilities through the City's Code Enforcement Division. Considering the potential seriousness of this problem, Mr. Stone relayed his support of the City contracting with a service that regularly sprays, etc. versus solely operating through constituent complaints. Assistant to the City Manager Yates reassured Mr. Stone and the public of the City's proactive approach with regard to this issue through regular patrols. In response to Mr. Stone's comments regarding the West Nile Virus, Mayor Naggar commented on the City's proactive approach for the past two years but stated that any suggestions with regard to this devastating virus would be welcomed. Mr. Stone as well invited the public to the Veterans' Memorial Dedication on Thursday, November 11, 2004, at 2:00 P.M., at the Duck Pond. With regard to the Veterans' Memorial Dedication, City Manager Nelson noted that a public shuttle service, starting at 1:00 P.M., will be provided from the Rancho California Sports Park. D. Echoing his colleagues' comments, Mayor Naggar as well invited the public to attend the Veterans' Memorial Dedication and encouraged everyone to come early. Having visited Old Town this past weekend, Mayor Naggar commented on the success of the Erle Stanley Gardner Mystery Weekend in Old Town. With regard to the communication with regard to North General Kearney, Mayor Naggar welcomed such communication. Addressing Mr. Sander's comment with regard to the potential closure of the Experience Unlimited facility, Mayor Naggar requested that staff provide specifics of the potential closure along with potential solutions in keeping the facility open. RAM!nutes%110904 2 CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Resolution approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 City Treasurer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 2004. 4 Liability Insurance Renewal RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the City of Temecula Liability Insurance Policy Renewal with Clarendon America Insurance Company/Arch Specialty Insurance Company, in the amount of $274,063 for general and excess liability insurance for the period of December 1, 2004, through December 1, 2005. 5 Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Annual Holiday Parade on December 10, 2004, and Delegate Authority to issue Special Events/Street Closures Permit to the Director of Public Works/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RAMinutes\110904 RESOLUTION NO.04-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES FOR JEFFERSON AVENUE AND ABUTTING STREETS FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO OVERLAND DRIVE AND ALSO THE LOW FLOW CROSSING AT VIA MONTEZUMA AT DIAZ ROAD FOR TEMECULA'S ANNUAL HOLIDAY PARADE ON DECEMBER 10, 2004, AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING STREET CLOSURES Santa Gertrudis Valley — Harveston/Date Street Storm Drain, Stage 2 Proiect No. 7-0- 0189, Tract Map No. 29639-2 — Cooperative Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Santa Gertrudis Valley — Harveston/Date Street Storm Drain, Stage 2 Project No. 7-0-0189, Tract No. 29639-2 — Cooperative Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Harveston LLC, and the City of Temecula. 6.2 Approve Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $601,002 (six hundred and one thousand and two dollars) and Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $601,002 (six hundred and one thousand and two dollars) as security for the agreement. 6.3 Authorize the execution of such agreements in their final form by the Mayor, City Attorney, and City Clerk. Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans for the Relinquishment of State Route 79 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Review and approve the attached Cooperative Agreement between the City of Temecula and Caltrans specifying the terms and conditions of transferring the responsibility of the Temecula portion of State Route 79 from Caltrans to the City of Temecula and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RAMinutes\110904 RESOLUTION NO. 04-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (NO. 8-1268) BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) TO ACCEPT RELINQUISHMENT OF THOSE SEGMENTS OF WINCHESTER ROAD (SR 79N) AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH (SR 79S) EXTENDING FROM 1-15 TO THE APPROXIMATE CITY LIMITS RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $66,400 for the demolition of improvements on City -owned property. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 8. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent. At 7:32 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Temecula Public Financing Authority. At 7:39 P.M., the City Council resumed with regular business. PUBLIC HEARING 9 Amendment to Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay No. 4 (PA04-0384) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO.04-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE "TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) ZONING DOCUMENT TO PERMIT THE SALE OF ALCOHOL IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL PLANNING AREA, AND OTHER MINOR TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR CLARIFICATION By way of overheads, Senior Planner Papp presented the staff report (of record). In response to the Councilmembers, Mr. Papp noted the following: that the Planning Commission would encourage the City Council to approve the request of permitting the sale of alcohol in the Village Commercial area (PDO-4V) with the exception of a convenience market which will not be a permitted use; that the applicant/owner has no objection with the deletion of the convenience RAMinutes\110904 market from PDO-4V; that most uses with the exception of restaurants with beer and wine sales only (a permitted use) would require a Conditional Use Permit; that the area of discussion would not be viewed by the State as an area of over concentration of alcohol licenses; that liquor stores will not be permitted in the Village Commercial Area but will be permitted in the other general retail area; and that liquor stores are a conditionally permitted use in the PDO-4R area. For Councilman Stone, Deputy City Manager Thornhill clarified that because the PDO-4V area has been designed as a pedestrian -oriented development that caters to the needs of the people residing in the area, the sale of alcohol would not be permitted in this particular area and that the proposed zoning is project specific. Councilman Stone commended Senior Planner Papp on a job well done and as well commended the Planning Commission on its efforts associated with this project. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Not desirous of addressing the City Council, the applicant indicated concurrence with the staff report. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Encouraging the development of pedestrian -oriented communities, Councilman Washington relayed his support of the recommendation. Viewing this project as truly the City's first mixed -use project, Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero commended Senior Planner Papp and those involved with this project and expressed his support of it. Assistant City Attorney Curley introduced Ordinance No. 04-14 by title only. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to introduce ordinance No. 04-14. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent. 10 An Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of PA 03-0723 (Development Plan), a proposal to develop two single -story retail buildings totaling 13,350 square feet on 1.3 acres RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:Winutes%110904 RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0723 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0723 TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE TWO SINGLE - STORY RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 13,350 SQUARE FEET ON 1.3 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND MARGARITA ROAD ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-810-021, 029 & 921-830- 030 By way of overheads, Principal Planner Hazen presented the staff report (as per agenda material), noting that the Planning Commission had denied the project; that the Commissioners voting in opposition of the project were of the opinion that the Master Site Plan proposed a single, free-standing building and that a multiple, L-shaped building would not provide the level of desired architectural quality; and that Commissioners Chiniaeff and Telesio supported the project recognizing that the proposed project would be located eight feet below grade, making the man doors not visible to the general public because of landscaping and the retaining wall. In response to the Councilmembers, Mr. Hazen noted that staffs recommendation to the Planning Commission was to approve the project; that parapet walls were designed to screen any rooftop equipment; that staff had no concern with the size of the proposed building with respect to the size of the lot; that the building would be proportional to the scale of development on the site; that it would meet all required setbacks; that a water fountain display will be located in the plaza opening area to further enhance this area; that the Planning Commission had explored the possibility of flipping the L-shaped building (frontage facing the street and back facing other corporate buildings) but concluded that it would not have benefited the entire site considering the grade separation, descending from the street level to access the project; that possibly false windows could be installed on the rear elevation to further enhance this elevation in order to minimize the differentiation between the front and rear elevations; that a monument sign would not be permitted on the corner of Margarita and Overland Roads; that a multiple tenant, retail building has been proposed; that two trash facilities (double bin enclosures) along with decorative trellis work with vines and vegetation along the block walls for screening have been proposed; that the trash enclosures will be colored stucco to match the building; and that monument signs have been proposed and will be permitted at both entryways. Councilman Stone noted that extensive detail has been focused on the rear of the building to meet the architectural standards of the General Plan. In response to Mayor Naggar, Chairman Telesio provided an overview of the Planning Commission's review of this project, stating the following: That the prevailing three votes were primarily concerned with flipping the building, insufficient embellishments considering the importance of the corner, rejecting the building -orientation concept but not necessarily offering specific ideas but it was concluded that the proposed orientation was appropriate R: Ainutes\110904 • That the opinion of the two Commissioners in support was that sufficient embellishments were provided taking into consideration the elevation difference, the topography, the landscaping, and the orientation. At this time, Mayor Naggar opened the public hearing Commending staff on the summarization of the issues, Mr. Allan Abshez, Los Angeles, representing the applicant, reiterated that the site of discussion is located below grade; that it will not be accessible by pedestrians from Margarita and Overland Roads; that the proposed architectural elements will present an attractive frontage to Margarita and Overland Roads; and that once existing landscaping has matured, the building will be substantially screened. In closing, Mr. Abshez requested the Council's approval of the project. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. Having reviewed the packet of information with regard to this project, Councilman Stone reiterated that the proposed architectural standards are outstanding; that the proposed building will benefit future retail businesses; and therefore, spoke in support of the project and to uphold the appeal. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to uphold the appeal. Due to the lack of a second, this motion died. Echoing Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero's concerns with regard to the rear building elevation, Councilman Washington noted that considering that the building will be located below grade and as well as the existing landscaping and the proposed monument signs, the architect has done a good job to the rear of the building and that the front of the building would not work on Margarita and Overland Roads; that would he view the proposed building properly sited and situated on the parcel; and, therefore, after giving it some additional thought, would be inclined to support the project. Considering the building and its options, Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero stated that, in his opinion, the architect has explored all possible options to mitigate the rear elevation and, therefore, would as well support it but suggested the consideration of more mature landscaping. For Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that most of the landscaping is existing and that additional landscaping will be provided; that the Council may direct staff to further work with the applicant to explore the feasibility of windows on the rear elevation. Mr. Comerchero expressed his support of Mr. Thornhill's suggestion. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to uphold the appeal and to direct staff to work with the applicant to enhance the rear architecture of the building. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero. (This motion was ultimately amended.) To ensure future landscaping will be as proposed by the submitted exhibits, Mayor Naggar requested that the motion include verbiage that the final landscaping product should substantially conform to a specific Exhibit No. Not necessarily supporting the installation of additional windows, Mr. Naggar recommended additional trellising or planting treatments against the building. RAMinutes\110904 With regard to landscaping, Councilman Washington noted that too much landscaping would not be any more desirable than not having any landscaping, commenting on the need to create a balance with the project. AMENDED MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to uphold the appeal; to approve the request, directing staff to work with the applicant to enhance the rear architecture of the building; and to reference that the final product shall substantially conform to a specific Exhibit No. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent. ta'�Y k iiIT�FCel -Z I:7&I:74Is] :41 No additional comment. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT There being no Closed Session, the Assistant City Attorney had nothing to report. ADJOURNMENT At 8:36 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to a regular meeting on Tuesday, November 23, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. California. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CIVIC City Clerk [SEAL[ R:Wlinutes\110904 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 04_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,605,569.24. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 23rd day of November, 2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos 2004/Resos 04- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 04- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23n day of November, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Resos 2004/Resos 04- CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 11/04/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 1,527,139.29 11/10/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 719,861.73 11/04/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 358,568.22 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 1123/04 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 2,605,569.24 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 779,500.52 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 2,756.50 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 11,369.32 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 130,773.20 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL'B' STREET LIGHTS 87.65 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL'C' LANDSCAPE/SLOPE 11,434.82 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL'D' REFUSEIRECYCLING 7,403.47 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 960.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROV PROJECT FUND 1,179,947.82 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 1,250.00 274 JOHNWARNERAD 2,496.25 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -CIP PROJECT 26,835.11 300 INSURANCE FUND 13,659.53 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 32,821.13 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 2,751.92 340 FACILITIES 17,388.90 390 TCSD COP DEBT SERVICE-TEMEUCLA 01 4,050.00 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND 6,889.88 470 HARVESTON CFD 01-2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,600.00 473 CROWNE HILL CFD 03-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,125.00 475 WOLF CREEK CFD 03-3 DEBT SERVICE FUND 10,000.00 $ 2,247,001.02 001 GENERAL FUND 247,454.28 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 5,467.14 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 62,606.55 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL'B'STREET LIGHTS 114.93 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL'C' LANDSCAPEISLOPE 5,400.24 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL'D' REFUSE/RECYCLING 851.27 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -CIP PROJECT 2,812.65 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,055.14 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 21,982.59 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3,443.97 340 FACILITIES 7,379.46 358,568.22 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 2,605,569.24 PREPARED BY RETA W ESTON, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. SHAW N NELSON, CITY MANAGER apChkLst 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 401 11/04/2004 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PREMIU PERS Health Admin Cost Payment 59,244.49 59,244.49 402 11/04/2004 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Ins Payment 18,182.20 18,182.20 403 11/04/2004 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 68,985.37 68,985.37 404 11/04/2004 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SO Nationwide Retirement Payment 18,302.10 18,302.10 405 11/04/2004 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREME PERS ER Paid Member Contr Pmt 89,599.68 89,599.68 406 11/04/2004 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA), OBRA - Project Retirement Payment 2,886.34 2,886.34 95730 11/04/2004 003552 A F L A C AFLAC Cancer Payment 1,732.20 1,732.20 95731 11/04/2004 000434 ACCELA.COM 25 Permits Off icelink licenses 540.25 540.25 95732 11/04/2004 001916 ALBERT A W EBB ASSOCIATES Annual Admin:CFD 03-3 Wolf Creek 10,000.00 1st Otr Admin:CFD 1-02 Harveston 2,500.00 1st Otr Admin:CFD 03-1 Crowns Hill 2,125.00 1st Otr Admin:CFD 88-12 Ynez 1,500.00 Consulting:CFD 88-12 sales tax reimb 1,250.00 17,375.00 95733 11/04/2004 003859 ALL ABOUT SELF STORAGE TVM offsite storage ann'I lease 1,200.00 1,200.00 95734 11/04/2004 008243 ALL STAR GLASS COMPANY I glass to repair radar trailer 135.81 135.81 95735 11/04/2004 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES Nov Stand-by svcs forensic secs 500.00 500.00 95736 11/04/2004 004446 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL Membership: Scott Harvey 306039 195.00 195.00 95737 11/04/2004 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALL Sept animal control services 8,750.00 8,750.00 95738 11/04/2004 000101 APPLE ONE INC. Temp help PPE 10116 GK/ML 1,200.16 Temp help PPE 10/9 GK/ML 1,188.00 Temp help PPE 10/16 Wills 828.40 Temp help PPE 10/16 Buchanan 540.00 3,756.55 95739 11/04/2004 008062 ARROW STAFF RESOURCES, I Temp help PPE 10/24 Grove/Neer 2,789.96 2,789.96 Page:t apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95740 11/04/2004 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC Bottled wtr servs @ City Hall 314.10 Bottled wtr servs @ Mntc Fac 184.94 Bottled wtr servs @ C.Museum 93.31 Bottled wtr servs @ CRC 74.42 Bottled wtr servs @ TCC 31.73 Bottled wtr servs @ T.Museum 28.84 Bottled wtr servs @ Skate Park 17.02 Bottled wtr servs @ TES pool 9.69 Credit: City Hall filter rental -2.66 751.39 95741 11/04/2004 005335 ARTIST TOUCH STUDIO Sister City Gift - Duckpond artwork 237.92 237.92 95742 11/04/2004 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TCSD mntc staff polo shirts 371.74 371.74 95743 11/04/2004 006364 BARNES AND NOBLE STORE Medics reference materials 486.34 486.34 95744 11/04/2004 008305 BATES, MICHAEL Refund: Sports -BB Mans League 50.00 50.00 95745 11/04/2004 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV Channels drainage repairs 6,520.00 6,520.00 95746 11/04/2004 005432 BEL VILLAGGIO Refund:Depst:41273 E Margarita 1,500.00 1,500.00 95747 11/04/2004 008306 BEVERIDGE, THOMAS Refund: Sports -BB Mans League 50.00 50.00 95748 11/04/2004 006721 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE Holiday Lights brochure paper 315.17 Misc office supplies:Finance 111.68 Misc office supplies:Finance 54.52 Misc office supplies: Police Dept 28.51 509.88 95749 11/04/2004 008307 BOYNES, HOWARD Refund: Security depst: CRC 100.00 100.00 95750 11/04/2004 007806 BROWN, HERMAN Reimb: ENCASE tmg:9/20-24/04 2.68 2.68 95751 11/04/2004 005055 BROWN, STEVE Reimb: Clerical teambidg luncheon 83.77 83.77 95752 11/04/2004 008303 BUSTAMANTE, LORI Refund: Picnic shelter rental: RCSP 25.00 25.00 95753 11/04/2004 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/ACCT Jul DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening 3,080.00 Credit: Billed incorrect agency -980.00 2,100.00 95754 11/04/2004 000933 CALIF DEPT OF Trffc Signal plan ck:Hwy 79s Rustic GI 4,000.00 4,000.00 Page2 apChkLst 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95755 11/04/2004 005660 CALIF EMS AUTHORITY Recertification: Curtiss Tate P05442 130.00 130.00 95756 11/04/2004 004381 CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE ACLS medics renewal certifications 165.00 165.00 95757 11/04/2004 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARI Community Health Charities Payment 158.00 158.00 95758 11/04/2004 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS T.Museum fire system eve call 75.00 75.00 95759 11/04/2004 003739 COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATE Oct Consultant: update general plan 2,250.41 2,250.41 95760 11/04/2004 005567 CUSTOM GEAR AND INK 4th of July T-shirts & logo 961.20 961.20 95761 11/04/2004 008308 DESANCHEZ, RAMON & TELES Refund: Fac Impr Prgm Devel fees 135.00 135.00 95762 11/04/2004 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL C.Museum portable restroom rental 114.95 Bttrfld Prk portable restroom rental 57.48 172.43 95763 11/04/2004 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK Oct special events premiums 3,814.69 3,814.69 95764 11/04/2004 002438 ENGEN CORPORATION Sept Geotech:Veteran's Memorial 345.00 345.00 95765 11/04/2004 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE Sept Idscp impr:Sports Park 1,707.25 1,707.25 95766 11/04/2004 000478 FAST SIGNS Special events banners 78.04 78.04 95767 11/04/2004 003397 FIRE ENGINEERING Annual Subscription to Fire Eng. 19.95 19.95 95768 11/04/2004 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER AMAZON.COM, INC DU Books:Cega & 01Supplement 240.00 FISH HOUSE INC. DU Refreshments:lnterview panel 82.58 SIZZLER RESTAURANT DU Refreshments:Planning Com. Mtg 52.27 MEXICO CHIQUITO DU Refreshments:Planning Com. Mtg 50.82 BLACK ANGUS DU Refreshments:Working Mtgs 41.85 PENFOLD'S CAFE DU Refreshments:Planning Com. Mtg 20.00 ORIGINAL PANCAKE HOUSE DU Refreshments:Planning Com. Mtg 18.65 PENFOLD'S CAFE DU Refreshments: Planning Com. Mtg 9.67 515.84 Page3 apChkLst 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95769 11/04/2004 004239 FISHER SEHGAL YANEZ INC Architectual Design:Old Town 3,301.50 Architectual Design:Old Town 670.50 3,972.00 95770 11/04/2004 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Support Payment Case # 573767112 102.66 102.66 95771 11/04/2004 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY I Day timer supplies-PW/Eng 1,460.76 1,460.76 95772 11/04/2004 004514 G T S I CORP 2 CPU Mini Towers: Fire Sin 534.44 534.44 95773 11/04/2004 003792 GRAINGER Stn 92 Medic Cabinet/Shelfs 400.83 400.83 95774 11/04/2004 007069 GRAY, DARIN Reimb:lnvestigators trng:10/12-16 749.28 749.28 95775 11/04/2004 007038 HART, GENE Refund: Sports -BB Mans League 50.00 50.00 95776 11/04/2004 006250 HAZ MAT TRANS INC Haz Waste Disposal for PW 1,815.00 1,815.00 95777 11/04/2004 008309 HERD, MAIDA Reimb: Budgeting tmg:10/28-29 81.53 81.53 95776 11/04/2004 004811 HEWLETT PACKARD 2 HP LaserJet paper trays 971.91 971.91 95779 11/04/2004 002107 HIGHMARK INC Voluntary Supp Life Insurance 622.70 622.70 95780 11/04/2004 000963 HOGAN, DAVID Reimb: CCAPA Conf:10/16-20 217.34 217.34 95781 11/04/2004 004399 HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH Refund: Security depst: MPSC 100.00 100.00 95782 11104/2G04 006581 HULING, HARRIET Refund: Practical Yoga 57.00 57.00 95783 11/04/2004 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 45 1 C M A Retirement Trust 457 Pmt 7,173.60 7,173.60 95784 11/04/2004 004833 IMPERIAL PAVING COMPANY I Citywide A.C. Repairs for PW 51,621.00 51,621.00 95785 11/04/2004 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I Pool sanitizing chemicals 158.93 158.93 95786 11/04/2004 008302 JENKS, JULIE Refund: Tiny Tots:Terrific 3's 51.00 51.00 Page:4 apChkLst 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95787 11/04/2004 004908 JIFFY LUBE 1878 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 49.65 49.65 95788 11/04/2004 006666 JUSTUS, JEANETTE Refund:Yoga Postnatal 52.00 52.00 95789 11/04/2004 008304 KAUP, ROBERT Refund: Tiny Tots - Terrific 3's 59.00 59.00 95790 11/04/2004 004481 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES I Sept Design Prgss:Mulfi-Purpose Td 9,981.00 9,981.00 95791 11/04/2004 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC Aquatic - Pool Mntc supplies 79.87 79.87 95792 11/04/2004 000488 KNOTTS BERRY FARM TCSD teen excursion:Scary Farm 1.394.00 1,394.00 95793 11/04/2004 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC Aug/Sept geo test:R.Cal Widening 980.00 980.00 95794 11/04/2004 000586 LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDE Website muni code ann'I storage 495.00 495.00 95795 11/04/2004 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC Supplies for Paramedic squad 3,945.59 Supplies for Paramedic squad 374.50 Supplies for Paramedic squad 68.64 4,388.73 95796 11/04/2004 006182 M C M CONSTRUCTION, INC. Prgs pmt #11:R.C. Bridge Widening 602,386.00 602,386.00 95797 11/04/2004 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS Road signs & hardware: PW 453.47 Road signs & hardware: PW 78.12 531.59 95798 11/04/2004 004141 MAINTEX INC Sr Ctr custodial supplies 239.94 CRC custodial supplies 97.93 337.87 95799 11/04/2004 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SER Temp help We 10/17 Dankworth 658.40 658.40 95800 11/04/2004 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE Metlife Dental Payment 7,765.28 7,765.28 95801 11/04/2004 007210 MIDORI GARDENS irrigation repairs:Vail Ranch Prk 9/22 451.14 irrigation repairs:Vail Ranch Prk 9/30 340.36 irrigation repairs:Crowne Hill Prk 9/13 98.66 890.16 95802 11/04/2004 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS Spark/Love toy drive fliers: Fire Prev 133.83 business cards:A.Bostre-Le/K.Hannah 85.66 business cards: A. McClanahan 42.83 business cards:S. Lee 42.83 305.15 95803 11/04/2004 004534 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES Nov EOC Stn Satellite Phone Svcs 70.75 70.75 Pages apChkLst 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check If Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95804 11/04/2004 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Clean Channel: Empire Creek 3,950.00 Clean Channel: Calls Medusa 2,950.00 6,900.00 95805 11/04/2004 008299 MORALES, FELICIA Refund: Intro to Taekwondo 45.00 45.00 95806 11/04/2004 007011 MORRIS MEYERS MAINTENAN Sep maint svcs:park r.r./picnic shelter 4,847.50 4,847.50 95807 11/04/2004 001986 MUZAK -SOUTHERN CALIFORN Nov "On -Hold" phone music:City Hall 120.86 120.86 95808 11/04/2004 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS Fire Prev vehicle parts/maint 9.68 9.68 95809 11/04/2004 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 725.44 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 231.53 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 218.30 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 60.83 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 39.96 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 19.29 1,295.35 95810 11/04/2004 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY TCC recreation supplies 153.86 Parent & Me Prgm supplies 109.75 263.61 95811 11/04/2004 002256 P & D CONSULTANTS INC Sep -Oct temp bldg inspection: R. H. 8,425.92 8,425.92 95812 11/04/2004 005656 PAPA Anaheim Sem:12/1:D.Camberos 55.00 55.00 95813 11/04/2004 003218 PELA Sep Idscp inspection svos:R.C. Rd 236.50 236.50 95814 11/04/2004 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE FROG PERS Long Term Care Payment 288.55 288.55 95815 11/04/2004 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash:Team Pace event:11/18 280.00 280.00 95816 11/04/2004 001999 PITNEY BOWES Dec -Mar rental/postage:Stn 84 63.85 63.85 95817 11/04/2004 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES I Prepaid Legal Services Payment 324.85 324.85 95818 11/04/2004 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN annual subscription:I.S.:4462959 160.16 160.16 95819 11/04/2004 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTAN Aug -Sep dsgn svcs:Murr.Crk/Ovedand 923.80 923.80 95820 11/04/2004 008024 QUARTERMASTER INC Temecula Police uniform patches 246.68 246.68 Page£ apChkLst 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95821 11/04/2004 001364 R C P BLOCK & BRICK INC graffiti removal supplies: PW 303.86 303.86 95822 11/04/2004 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC Sep dsgn svcs:W.C.Sports Complex 10,454.03 10,454.03 95823 11/04/2004 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST Various Water Meters 2,471.75 2,471.75 95824 11/04/2004 008097 RECY-CAL SUPPLY COMPANY trash recepticle: G.O.H.S. 323.25 323.25 95825 11/04/2004 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING Old Town electrical supplies 437.55 City Hall electrical supplies 354.77 var parks electrical supplies 196.84 City Hall electrical supplies 141.91 C. Museum electrical supplies 44.22 C. Museum electrical supplies 32.33 1,207.62 95826 11/04/2004 002907 REINHART FONTES Appraisal of Parkland Property 6,500.00 6,500.00 95827 11/04/2004 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE Citywide emerg cleaning 10/19-21/04 1,207.00 1,207.00 95828 11/04/2004 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & Sep Recording/Copy fees: RDA 132.00 132.00 95829 11/04/2004 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP Sept 2004 Booking Fees 8,500.80 8,500.80 95830 11/04/2004 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP Traf Collision lnv:8/23:K.Reld 132.00 Crime Scene Inv:9/28:F. Wright 40.75 172.75 95831 11/04/2004 003587 RIZZO CONSTRUCTION INC remove/replace well caps: Pala Prk 960.00 960.00 95832 11/04/2004 007830 ROAD BUILDERS INC Prgs Pmt #4:Pechanga Pkwy Ph 2 242,152.34 242,152.34 95833 11/04/2004 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. Reimb:N.L.C. Committee:9/29-10/3 59.12 59.12 95834 11/04/2004 004598 S T K ARCHITECTURE INC Sep dsgn svcs: W.C. Fire Sm 2,865.00 2,865.00 95835 11/04/2004 007582 SAFEGUARD DENTAL & VISION SafeGuard Vision Plan Payment 991.46 991.46 95836 11/04/2004 005227 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF Support Payment Case # DF099118 25.00 25.00 95837 11/04/2004 006815 SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF Support Payment Acct # 581095025 12.50 12.50 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95838 11/04/2004 000793 SCANTRON FPC CORPORATIO scantron inspection forms: B&S Opt. 883.34 883.34 95839 11/04/2004 004562 SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CDR Sep plan check svcs:Fire Prev 5,500.00 5,500.00 95840 11/04/2004 008072 SECURITY SPECIALISTS Refund:Sports-BB Mans League 50.00 50.00 95841 11/04/2004 004609 SHREDFORCE INC Oct coo shred svcs: Rcrd Mgmt 110.00 Oct doc shred svcs: P.D. O.T. Stn 24.00 134.00 95842 11/04/2004 007342 SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGE Sept legal services pmt 198.03 198.03 95843 11/04/2004 004814 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING I Sep dsgn svcs: Main Street Bridge 16,210.38 16,210.38 95844 11/04/2004 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Halloween Carnival supplies 766.32 Children's Museum supplies 75.01 Teen prgm supplies 73.66 Halloween Carnival supplies 64.32 Team Pace misc supplies 60.79 Children's Museum supplies 44.51 1,084.61 95845 11/04/2004 002718 SO CALIF CITY CLERKS ASSN SCCCA mtg:Jones/Ballreich: 11/18 60.00 60.00 95846 11/04/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Oct 2-02-502-8077 Maint Fac 1,887.82 Sep 2-19-683-3263 Various Mfrs 1,254.31 Oct 2-00-397-5067 Various Mfrs 1,009.04 Oct 2-22-575-0876 Various Mtrs 258.03 Oct 2-18-528-9980 Santiago Rd 48.95 4,458.15 95847 11/04/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Sep 2-19-999-9442 Various Mfrs 1,362.91 Oct 2-24-628-8963 Btrfld Stage 28.18 1,391.09 95848 11/04/2004 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Oct 091-085-1632-0 T.E.S. pool 701.25 various City Facilities gas mtrs 159.07 860.32 95849 11/04/2004 008300 SO CALIF TURFGRASS COUNCI Turfgrass/Ldscp Inst.:12/15:KH/DT 170.00 170.00 95850 11/04/2004 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST pest control svcs: T. Museum 42.00 pest control svcs: C. Museum 36.00 pest control svcs: Wedding Chpl 32.00 pest control svcs: P.D. Caboose 29.00 pest control svcs: Sr Center 29.00 168.00 95851 11/04/2004 007762 STANDARD OF OREGON Mandatory Life Insurance Payment 2,450.00 2,450.00 PageB apChkLst 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95852 11/04/2004 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FUN Oct 04 Worker's Comp Premium 48,457.14 48,457.14 95853 11/04/2004 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FUN FY 03/04 audit w/o payment 2,129.28 2,129.28 95854 11/04/2004 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL Aug -Oct Constr Support: R.0 Bridge 1,124.85 1,124.85 95855 11/04/2004 000305 TARGET STORE High Hopes Supplies 96.96 96.96 95856 11/04/2004 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 Union Dues Payment 3,742.00 3,742.00 95857 11/04/2004 006465 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR Medic Squad vehicle repair/maint 511.60 Medic Squad vehicle repair/maint 28.40 540.00 95858 11/04/2004 005412 TEMECULA GARDEN & POWER PW small equipment repair/maint 39.86 39.86 95859 11/04/2004 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL repair & maint:Police motorcycles 266.99 266.99 95860 11/04/2004 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPAN Halloween Carnival supplies 194.04 Good Neighbor award plaque 110.07 Good Neighbor perpetual plaque 16.16 name tag/name plate: R. Parks 15.62 335.89 95861 11/04/2004 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Repair panic bar: Sr Center 312.70 312.70 95862 11/04/2004 008296 TEMECULA VALLEY YOUNG MA FY 04/05 Comm Svc Funding Award 2,600.00 2,500.00 95863 11/04/2004 008296 TEMECULA VALLEY YOUNG MA Refund:Sec.Deposit:CRC: 10/23 100.00 100.00 95864 11/04/2004 008298 TEMECULA VLY MOTHERS MU Refund:Sec.Deposit/Rental: 10/24 125.00 125.00 95865 11/04/2004 007250 TETRA TECH INC Sep -Oct dsgn svcs: Rnbw Cyn guard 244.86 244.86 95866 11/04/2004 005316 THOMPSON, MICHELLE Refund:room rental:CRC:12/16 45.00 45.00 95867 11/04/2004 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC DJ Svcs:Fall Skaters Challenge:10116 400.00 DJ Svcs:Teen Dance 10/15 350.00 DJ Svcs: Teen Dance: 9/24 350.00 DJ Svcs:Teen Talent Show 10/23 250.00 1,350.00 95868 11/04/2004 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL PW small equipment parts 14.46 PW small equipment parts 9.29 23.75 PageB apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 11/04/2004 1:18:44PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95869 11/04/2004 005873 TRI AD ACTUARIES INC Child Care Reimbursement Payment 7,180.77 7,180.77 95870 11/04/2004 006360 TVS ELITE Refund:Sec. Deposit:10/24 100.00 100.00 95871 11/04/2004 005592 TWINING LABORATORIES inspect/testing final report:Soundwall 364.00 364.00 95872 11/04/2004 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL AS 2001 TCSD COP trusteetarbitrage fee 4,050.00 4,050.00 95873 11/04/2004 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 368.00 368.00 95874 11/04/2004 007909 UNLIMITED PROTECTIVE COAT remove/replace flooring: Sin 84 2,355.67 2,355.67 95875 11/04/2004 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERI Long Term Disability Payment 6,760.34 6,760.34 95876 11/04/2004 008297 URBAN STEPS/HIP-HOP X-PO Refund:Sec. Deposit:CRC:10/23 100.00 100.00 95877 11/04/2004 004368 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATES I Aug inspect svcs:Painter/Hernandez 11,681.00 11,681.00 95878 11/04/2004 007602 VANCE CORPORATION Prgs Pmt #3: Diaz Rd Realignment 66,907.21 66,907.21 95879 11/04/2004 004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION Internet svcs:xx7411 72.35 72.35 95880 11/04/2004 004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION Internet svcs:xx0544 72.35 72.35 95881 11/04/2004 004864 VINEYARD OF THE NEW WINE- FY 04/05 CDBG Funding 2,756.50 2,756.50 95882 11/04/2004 005995 WESTWAYS & JOURNEY PUBL Nov -Dec ad:Westways Mag.:Econ Dev 4,250.00 4,250.00 95883 11/04/2004 007141 ZIGLER, GAIL L. TCSD Instructor Earnings 187.20 187.20 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 1,527,139.29 Page:10 apChkLst 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check If Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95884 11/10/2004 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATES Sept consultant-Roripaugh/Bttdfield 5,933.28 5,933.28 95885 11/10/2004 007522 ALL STAR WATER HEATERS Refund:Duplicate Permit issued 65.01 Refund:State Permit required 30.00 95.01 95886 11/10/2004 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening 357.50 357.50 95887 11/10/2004 000101 APPLE ONE INC. Temp help PPE 10/23 GK/ML 1,210.28 Temp help PPE 10/23 Wills 697.60 TEMP HELP PPE 10123 BUCHANAN 540.00 Temp help PPE 10/23 McEntire 94.50 2,542.38 95888 11/10/2004 008062 ARROW STAFF RESOURCES, I Temp help PPE 10/31 JG/JH 3,146.04 3,146.04 95889 11/10/2004 004845 ARROW STAR INC Hand truck for Central Svcs 208.66 208.66 95890 11/10/2004 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE FY 04/05 Comm Svc Grant 10,000.00 10,000.00 95891 11/10/2004 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV Emerg repairs:Santiago/Ynez 3,523.25 Emerg repairs:J.Wamer @ ret. pond 1,255.90 4,779.15 95892 11/10/2004 008320 BIG JOHN'S HILLBILLY KETTLE Refund: Halloween Carnival Vendor 35.00 35.00 95893 11/10/2004 005145 BLUE FOUNTAIN POOLS, INC Refund: SMIP Permit fee adjtmt 33.58 33.58 95894 11/10/2004 000128 BROWN & BROWN OF CALIF. I Insurance policy: 41852 Main 422.00 422.00 95895 11/10/2004 004621 C-18 INC Citywide Street Striping Project 57,083.71 57,093.71 95896 11/10/2004 005911 CALIF FIRE PREVENTION Fire Prev Wkshp:3/14-18:Horton 275.00 275.00 95897 11/10/2004 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION S CPRS award submittal:Recycling Cal. 40.00 40.00 95898 11/10/2004 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY Helium tanks refill:TCSD 29.18 29.18 95899 11/10/2004 004017 COMERCHERO, JEFF Nat'l League Cities Cf:3/5-9/04 173.52 Nat'l League CED Steering:5/13-18 24.09 197.61 95900 11/10/2004 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS Jul/Aug geotech: Jefferson Rehab. 3,982.50 3,982.50 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95901 11/10/2004 001029 DATAQUICK INC Final svcs property data info 284.44 284.44 95902 11/10/2004 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Comm clean-up portable restroom re 91.55 91.55 95903 11/10/2004 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIALFUELI Fuel for city vehicles: TCSD 1,118.17 Fuel for city vehicles: PW Mntc 1,117.84 Fuel for city vehicles: Land Devel 901.88 Fuel for city vehicles: B&S 623.44 Fuel for city vehicles:Police/Planning 377.94 Fuel for city vehicles: CIP Division 280.23 Fuel for city vehicles: Traffic D. 144.33 Fuel for city vehicles: Code Enforce 64.13 Fuel for city vehicles: City Van 19.93 4,647.89 95904 11/10/2004 004990 ELEMENT K JOURNALS Inside Microsoft Frontpage:exp5/05 167.00 167.00 95905 11/10/2004 002438 ENGEN CORPORATION Geotech test:J. Warner Assmnt 2,496.25 2,496.25 95906 11/10/2004 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE Aug Idscp impr: Slope Svcs 125.20 125.20 95907 11/10/2004 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC Express mail services to Sister City 333.73 Express mail services 218.04 Express mail services 80.63 632.40 95908 11/10/2004 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Lot book reports: Sroka 75.00 Lot book reports: Smith 75.00 150.00 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95909 11/10/2004 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 001060 HYATT RR Htl:NLC Steering:9/30-10/3 915.06 000867 W ESTIN SEATTLE, THE GR Htl:Eden Conf:Simpson:9/20-23 605.88 001054 CALIF BUILDING OFFICIALS AE Energy Trng:Staff:l 0/25-26 455.00 006948 ALAMO RENT -A -CAR RR Car:NLC Steering:9/30-10/3 350.38 008326 AVIS RENT -A -CAR HP Car Rental:NRPA Cf:10/13-16 178.10 000879 RADISSON HOTEL JC Hotel:NLC Steering:9/30-10/2 131.34 008160 HARRAHS RENO HP HtVMeals:NRPA Cf:10/13-16 129.09 007053 LINDBERGH PARKING SAN DIE RR Airpt Pkg:NLC Steering:9/30-10/3 114.00 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION S HP Job Ad:Cul Arts Admin 80.00 007044 CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT HP Refreshments:lnterview Panel T.M 70.23 007053 LINDBERGH PARKING SAN DIE JC Airpt Pkg:NLC Steering:9/30-10/2 66.00 002612 RADIO SHACK INC GY DVD Player for main conf room 64.64 008323 VALET AIR PARK RR Pkg:Seoul Devel :10/15/04 52.58 RR Various bank charges 51.23 006942 ONTARIO AIRPORT HP Airpt Pkg:NRPA Cf:10/13-16 48.00 007029 BLACK ANGUS GR Refreshments:lnterview panel 22.35 008324 ISLEfA ONE STOP RR Fuel:NLC Steering:9/30-10/3 16.40 3,350.28 95910 11/10/2004 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL MED Employee first aid care 234.39 Pre -employment physicals 70.00 304.39 95911 11/10/2004 004239 FISHER SEHGAL YANEZ INC Architectural design: Comm.Theater 7,005.75 7,005.75 95912 11/10/2004 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY I Day timer supplies - Planning 21.86 21.86 95913 11/10/2004 004514 G T S I CORP 8 - AC Adapter & Batteries: IS 2,419.46 2,419.46 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check It Date Vendor Description 95914 11/10/2004 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Misc Office Supplies: Fire Stn 84 Misc Office Supplies: B&S Misc Office Supplies: Info System Misc Office Supplies: CM Misc Office supplies:Land Devel Misc Office Supplies:TCSD Misc Office supplies: CIP Division Misc Office Supplies: City Clerk Misc Office Supplies:Ctrl Svcs Misc Office Supplies: Records Mgmt Misc Office Supplies: Finance Misc Office Supplies: CRC Misc Office Supplies:Planning Misc Office Supplies:Fire Stn 84 95915 11/10/2004 005311 H2O CERTIFIED POOL WATER Oct pool mntc svcs @ CRC / TES 95916 11/10/2004 004053 HABITAT WEST INC 95917 11/10/2004 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 95918 11/10/2004 007610 ICTV Lg Canyon detention basin mntc Lg Canyon detention basin mntc Hardware supplies: Parks Hardware supplies: PW Hardware supplies: C.Museum Hardware supplies: PW mntc Hardware supplies: CRC Hardware supplies: City Hall Hardware supplies: Info System Hardware supplies: Old Town T.Museum exhibit supplies Hardware supplies: Sr Center Hardware supplies: TCC Refund: Security Deposit CRC 95919 11/10/2004 005579 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY Sept weed abatement svcs 95920 11/10/2004 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I Pool sanitizing chemicals 95921 11/10/2004 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD instructor earnings 95922 11/10/2004 OOB321 JANDA, TYLER Refund: Teen Knott's Scary Farm 95923 11/10/2004 008241 JOHN WEBER CONSTRUCTION Oct prgss:Japanese Garden Amount Paid 1,005.15 938.07 413.75 385.83 333.87 192.06 178.83 168.29 115.35 87.81 71.68 56.58 51.34 -162.49 1,942.44 450.00 -281.63 1,027.12 226.16 186.93 166.87 160.46 118.87 68.46 41.70 18.13 12.35 12.04 100.00 2,845.00 127.15 348.00 35.00 42,750.00 Check Total 3,836.12 1,942.44 168.47 2,039.09 100.00 2,845.00 127.15 348.00 35.00 42,750.00 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 95924 11/10/2004 008139 KELLEHER, PAT (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Refund: Picnic Shelter RCSP 30.00 30.00 95925 11/10/2004 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT Oct Real Estate Econ svcs Oct Affordable housing development Oct affordable housing consultant svc Aug Welty bldg rehab/Old Town 95926 11/10/2004 003900 KIMCO PALM PLAZA FY 03104 CFD 88-12 Reimbursement 95927 11/10/2004 006857 KIMCO PALM PLAZA FY 03104 CFD 88-12 Reimbursement 95928 11/10/2004 008256 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES I Bus svcs: Knotts Scary Farm 95929 11/10/2004 008322 LEON, ELIZABETH Refund: Security depst: CRC 10/8/04 95930 11/10/2004 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICE Oct svcs-library system agnnnt Oct svcs-library system agnnnt 95931 11/10/2004 006897 LORY, SUSAN, J. TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings 95932 11/10/2004 000394 MAINTENANCE Haz-Mat First Responder TmA 1116 95933 11/10/2004 004141 MAINTEX INC City Hall custodial supplies var parks custodial supplies Old Town custodial supplies Old Town custodial supplies Old Town custodial supplies 4,235.00 3,000.63 1,840.00 951.25 65,786.96 15,444.04 ler. 11,453.63 1,211.20 378.00 367.50 294.00 213.50 196.00 168.00 42.00 28.00 r rf 335.35 267.33 224.87 18.85 17.09 10,026.88 65,786.96 15,444.04 636.59 100.00 12,664.83 1,687.00 50.00 863.49 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95934 11/10/2004 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN TCSD Instructor Earnings 505.75 TCSD Instructor Earnings 388.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 294.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 252.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 210.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 208.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 56.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 28.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 28.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 28.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 28.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 28.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 14.00 2,067.75 95935 11/10/2004 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SER Temp help We 10/24 Dankworth 526.72 526.72 95936 11/10/2004 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSN Oct Sports Prgm Officiating Svcs 1,900.00 1,900.00 95937 11/10/2004 001256 MARRIOTT HOTEL Fire Prev Inst:3/13-17/05:83671074 369.60 369.60 95938 11/10/2004 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD Instructor Earnings 205.20 205.20 95939 11/10/2004 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC modem hardware for traffic server 1,713.23 1,713.23 95940 11/10/2004 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS Holiday in O.T. Promotion svcs 2,500.00 Reimb. expenses:HalloweerVE.S.G. 142.64 2,642.64 95941 11/10/2004 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEER Aug -Sep Svcs:F.V.Pkwy/1-15 Intrchg 68,473.40 68,473.40 95942 11/10/2004 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Remove 4000 C.Y./silt:Via Lobo Chn1 19,400.00 Construct 3 desilting ponds:Var loc 8,500.00 Srvc Level'R' grading dirt roads 960.00 Remove steel grates from stone drain 950.00 29,810.00 95943 11/10/2004 001986 MUZAK -SOUTHERN CALIFORN Nov Music broadcast: Old Town 64.86 64.86 95944 11/10/2004 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS small equip parts: PW Maint Div 84.02 small equip parts: PW Maint Div 23.52 107.54 95945 11/10/2004 005608 NEUMAN, JASON Reimb:Land Use Planning/text bk 421.00 421.00 95946 11/10/2004 007409 OLD TOWN DINING LLC Rfrshmnts:Japanese Dedication:11/19 875.00 875.00 PageB apChkLst 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95947 11/10/2004 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 53.00 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 40.33 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 20.37 113.70 95948 11/10/2004 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES Oct Duck Pond water maint. svcs 531.40 531.40 95949 11/10/2004 008326 PACIFIC ROOFING & DESIGN Refund: Eng Dep:Tract 9833 Lot 8 995.00 995.00 95950 11/10/2004 000359 PARKER, HERMAN Reimb:NRPA Conf:10/13.16/04 16.12 16.12 95951 11/10/2004 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA IN High Hopes prgm supplies 53.61 53.61 95952 11/10/2004 002099 PASCOE MANAGEMENT LLP Nov Iease:Old town restroom 826.00 826.00 95953 11/10/2004 004538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT COMPAN Mule rental for Code Enforcement 134.40 134.40 95954 11/10/2004 003218 PELA Oct plan check svcs: TCSD 5,171.00 Oct plan check svcs: Planning 5,070.00 10,241.00 95955 11/10/2004 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 553.72 Petty Cash Reimbursement 233.91 787.63 95956 11/10/2004 000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA Oct film/photo dev:T.Mus/TCSD 412.65 412.65 95957 11/10/2004 008318 PISCULLI, MARTHA Refund:Tennis Beginning Jr. 40.00 40.00 95958 11/10/2004 002579 POTAMUS PRESS Inspection Request Bks: Land Dev 343.24 343.24 95959 11/10/2004 004529 QUAID TEMECULA HARLEY-DA motorcycles repair/maint: Police 2,877.50 2,877.50 95960 11/10/2004 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS INC Trash containers for City Hall 6,177.31 6,177.31 95961 11/10/2004 004792 R H A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Dsgn svcs: Pablo Apis Park 160.61 160.61 95962 11/10/2004 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY PRGS PMT# 9: R.C. WIDENING 15,770.48 15,770.48 95963 11/10/2004 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST install water meter.O.T. Gateway Idsc 7,785.00 7,785.00 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95964 11/10/2004 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST Various Water Meters 8,666.06 Various Water Meters 1,031.02 Oct 01-08-38009-0 Fire Stn 92 69.45 Various Water Meters 65.27 9,821.80 95965 11/10/2004 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS Dup. Blueprints:Jefferson Ave 41.21 Dup Blueprints:W.C.Sports 32.97 dup. blueprints: Diaz Road Ellen 6.59 80.77 95966 11/10/2004 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING City Hall electrical supplies 70.95 City Hall electrical supplies 63.36 134.31 95967 11/10/2004 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE clean up sidewalks/R-O-W's:10/27-28 962.40 962.40 95968 11/10/2004 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC Sep On -Call Traffic Signal Maint 95969 11/10/2004 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & Sep 2004 legal services 95970 11/10/2004 000352 RIVERSIDE CO ASSESSOR Sep Assessor Maps: B&S Dept 95971 11/10/2004 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT May -Oct 2004 MSHCP 95972 11/10/2004 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT Jul-Sep'04 K-Rat payment 95973 11/10/2004 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP Radar Oper. tm:9/13: J. Nunley Laser Oper. trn:9/16: J.Nunley 95974 11/10/2004 007041 RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S ASSN. Public Safety Expo T-shirts 95975 11/10/2004 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE var recruitment ads for H.R. dept 95976 11/10/2004 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 95977 11/10/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 95978 11/10/2004 008280 SOFTWARE MEDIUM INC High Hopes prgm supplies High Hopes prgm supplies Gift Giving Campaign supplies Oct 2-00-397-5042 City Hall Nov 2-02-351-5281 CRC Nov 2-20-798-3248 C. Museum Nov 2-10-331-2153 TCC Websense 250 users, 12 month lice sales tax 1,242.37 77,154.29 81.00 17,177.00 2,550.00 72.00 25.00 125.00 1,443.23 177.27 98.60 43.23 6,664.80 4,333.63 1,398.52 792.79 6,054.00 -434.00 1,242.37 77,154.29 81.00 17,177.00 2,550.00 97.00 125.00 1,443.23 319.10 13,189.74 5,620.00 Page8 apChkLst 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check If Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Cheek Total 95979 11/10/2004 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST pest control svcs: CRC 90.00 pest control svcs: City Hall 56.00 pest control svcs: Maint Fac 40.00 pest control svcs: TCC 36.00 222.00 95980 11/10/2004 007851 SOUTHCOAST HEATING & AIR Install vent 0 CRC showers 550.00 550.00 95981 11/10/2004 005786 SPRINT 9/15-10/14/04 cellular svcs 16,858.60 16,858.60 95982 11/10/2004 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CL Floor waxing/buffing svcs:City 1,000.00 Water extraction svcs @ Sr Center 185.00 1,185.00 95983 11/10/2004 006145 STENO SOLUTIONS TRANSCRI Oct transcription svcs:Police 1,311.20 1,311.20 95984 11/10/2004 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL Jul -Oct dsgn svcs: Roripaugh Ranch 675.00 675.00 95985 11/10/2004 008315 TACO BELL CORPORATION Settlement Agreement Pmt 11,000.00 11,000.00 95986 11/10/2004 000305 TARGET STORE MPSC recreation supplies 105.59 105.59 95987 11/10/2004 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL Sunshine Fund 242.23 242.23 95988 11/10/2004 008311 TEMECULA VALLEY ATHLETIC Carnival booth operator:10/29/04 302.50 302.50 95989 11/10/2004 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & SU slopeslparks irrigation supplies 304.37 304.37 95990 11/10/2004 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Locksmith svcs: Var. Parks 32.33 32.33 95991 11/10/2004 007250 TETRA TECH INC Refund:Ovrpmt of fees:959-410-002 1,639.00 1,639.00 95992 11/10/2004 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC PA/Stage Renals:Hal.Camival:10/29 825.00 825.00 95993 11/10/2004 008310 TOO SPICE GIRLS TCSD Instructor Earnings 455.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 157.50 612.50 95994 11/10/2004 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE 1 18" traffic cones for special events 228.97 traffic control supplies:PW Maint 88.36 317.33 95995 11/10/2004 006192 TRISTAFF GROUP Temp help w/e 10/24 Longrridwell 1,167.40 Temp help w/e 10/10 Longrrldwell 1,099.15 Temp help w/e 10/17 Long 858.00 3.124.55 Page9 apChkLst 11/10/2004 12:11:28PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check If Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 95996 11/10/2004 004132 TRUCK HYDRAULIC EOUIPMEN PW boom truck maint1svc 326.05 326.05 95997 11/10/2004 008317 TRUEVINE PENTECOSTAL CHU Refund: Ovrpmt of fees 25.82 25.82 95998 11/10/2004 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALE Nov Udrgrnd svcs alert tickets:PW 96.60 96.60 95999 11/10/2004 004981 UNISOURCE SCREENING & 10/16-31/04 bckgmd screening svc 121.00 121.00 96000 11/10/2004 004502 UNITED GREEN TECH INC sales tax for controllers for 2 Parks 767.25 767.25 96001 11/10/2004 004504 VAIL RANCH SELF STORAGE Nov offsite storage:Rcrds Mgmt 67.00 67.00 96002 11/10/2004 004261 VERIZON Oct xxx-5509 general usage 147.54 Oct xxx-9897 general usage 90.15 Oct xxx-1999 general usage 37.40 Oct xxx-0049 general usage 30.11 Oct xxx-2629 Nagger 28.32 333.52 96003 11/10/2004 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. Oct access -CRC phone line 348.48 Oct access-C. Museum phone line 292.72 641.20 96004 11/10/2004 007695 VIDO SAMARZICH INC Prgs Pmt #2: Pablo Apis Park 69,538.09 69,538.09 96005 11/10/2004 004861 VON RICHTER, POLLY Rb:Mechanics/Bond Sale:10/27-28 105.00 105.00 96006 11/10/2004 001890 VORTEX DOORS garage doors maint/repair: Stn 84 288.87 288.87 96007 11/10/2004 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC Sep -Oct 04 TUMF fees 45,875.40 45,875.40 96008 11/10/2004 004829 WILSON GROUP LLC, THE Nov State lobbyist svcs for City issues 3,500.00 3,500.00 96009 11/10/2004 008319 YEAGLEY, STEPHANNIE Refund:Dance:Tot Pre Dance 90.00 90.00 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 719,861.73 Page:10 A [I APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: ity Manager/City Council FROM: Vj_ jxilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Northerly Half -Width of Deer Hollow Way into the City -Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 29305-1 PREPARED BY: �tonald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Steve Charette, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE NORTHERLY HALF -WIDTH OF DEAR HOLLOW WAY INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 29305-1) BACKGROUND: The northerly half of Deer Hollow Way was dedicated to the City of Temecula as an easement for public road and drainage purposes per Instrument No. 440865, as recorded by the County Recorder on December 4, 1990. The centerline of Deer Hollow Way acts as the boundary between the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside. The construction of the north and the south portions of Deer Hollow Way have been completed by the developer of Tract 29305-1 and the Temecula Valley Unified School District, respectively. The completion of the road was expedited to allow access to the new Great Oaks High School located at the southeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow Way. City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements for the northerly portion of Deer Hollow Way and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. Following acceptance by City Council, staff will reduce the Performance Bond to ten -percent and retain a Warranty Bond for one year. The Labor and Materials Bond will be released six months into the one-year warranty period. The public street now being accepted by this action is the northerly half -width of Deer Hollow Way located between Pechanga Parkway and the easterly subdivision boundary of Tract No. 29305-1. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and / or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2004-_with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. t RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\TM29305-I.Dee,H.11.w.Smee ccepmnce.do RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE NORTHERLY HALF -WIDTH OF DEAR HOLLOW WAY INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 29305-1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, On December 4, 1990, the County Recorder recorded an Offer of Dedication by separate instrument Document No. 440865, in which an offer of dedication as an easement for public road and drainage purposes for the northerly half -width of Deer Hollow Way was accepted by the City of Temecula: and, WHEREAS, the developer of Tract Map No. 29305-1 has completed the street and drainage improvements for the northerly half -width portion of Deer Hollow Way located within the City of Temecula: and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed: and, WHEREAS, A Warranty Bond will be held by the Clerk for a period of one year after acceptance by City Council of northerly half -width of Deer Hollow Way: and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby a ccepts i nto the C ity-Maintained S treet System t he n ortherly h alf-width o f D eer H ollow Way offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of November, 2004. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Michael S. Naggar, Mayor 2 RdAGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\TM29305-1.DeerHollow.StreetAccepmnce.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2004- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on 23rd day of November, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\TM29305-I.Dee,H.11.w.StreetAccepmnce.doc EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2004- Accepting a certain street offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula into the City -Maintained Street System as described below: That portion of the northerly half -width of Deer Hollow Way dedicated to the City of Temecula as an easement for public road and drainage purposes per Instrument No. 440865, recorded by the County Recorder on December 4, 1990. 4 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\TM29305- I. DeerHollow.StreetAccept nce.doc EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO.2004- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE - PUBLIC STREET INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED -STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: NOTE: MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEND STREET OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACCEPTED INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM 5 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\TM29305-I.DeerHollow.Str el ecepunce.doc ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL r CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER \/jai/__ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 23, 2004 Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEM) Grant Application for FY 2005-2006 Julie Dauer, CIP Specialist That the City Council: Receive and file this report regarding our Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEM) Grant Application for the development of the Temecula Park and Ride Landscape Enhancement Project, and authorize the Director of Public Works to forward said application to the California Resources Agency. 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.2004 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE TEMECULA PARK AND RIDE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND: The Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation (EEM) Program was enacted by the Legislature of the State of California through AB 471. Administered by the California Resources Agency, the program is intended to provide $10 million annually (up to $250,000 per project) for grant funds to local, state, federal and nonprofit entities for projects to enhance and mitigate the environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities. The Public Works Department has prepared a grant application request that we believe meets the goals of the EEM funding program. Our grant application seeks $50,000 in EEM funds to further enhance and mitigate the environmental impacts of the park and ride facility by implementing the Temecula Park and Ride Landscape Enhancement Project. The proposed project is a Highway Landscape and Urban Forestry project associated with the construction of the new park and ride facility to be located at State Route 79 South and La Paz Street. i R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\2005-06EEM Grant Applicaticn.doc If the grant application is successful, the Temecula Park and Ride Landscape Enhancement Project will demonstrate a direct relationship with the environmental impact of the construction of a new transportation facility. It will also provide the greatest and most appropriate degree of mitigation or enhancement over and above that required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Temecula has identified the Temecula Park and Ride Facility Project within its five-year Capital Improvement Program for FY 2005-2009. The combined cost estimate for the administration, design and construction of the Temecula Park and Ride Facility Project is $822,500. If successful, funding from the EEM program would provide $50,000 towards the additional mitigation and landscape enhancement relative to the park & ride facility. Capital Project Reserves and Assembly Bill 2766 funds have been identified. If our application is awarded funding an additional appropriation would be necessary for the remaining $200,000 cost of the improvements. Pursuant to the EEM program guidelines, the Resource Agency will forward all recommended projects and funding requests to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in April 2005. The CTC is expected to preliminarily announce funded projects in July 2005. Awarded funds must be expended within three fiscal years. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2004- Vicinity Map 2 R:WAGENDA REPORTS12004\112304\2005-06EEM Grant Application.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE TEMECULA PARK AND RIDE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted AB 471 (Chapter 106 of the Statutes of 1989), which is intended to provide $10 million annually for a period of 10 years for grant funds to local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit entities for projects to enhance and mitigate the environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, the Resources Agency has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing grant proposals and is required to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of recommended projects from which the grant recipients will be selected; and WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the Resources Agency required a resolution certifying the approval of the applicant's governing body before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the environmental enhancement and mitigation project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows Section 1. Approves the filing of an application for the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for grant assistance. Section 2. Certifies that the City of Temecula will make adequate provisions for operation and maintenance of the project. Section 3. Appoints William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of November 2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor 3 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\2005-06EEM Grant Application.doc ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2004-_was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of November, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: - 01413 COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 4 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\2005-06EEM Grant Application.doc w a w d 'o^ Pr ITEM 6 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII CITY MANAGER, CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Grant Yates, Human resources Director DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Revision to the Schedule of Authorized Positions RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Schedule of Authorized Positions as amended. BACKGROUND: The City's Labor Attorney has completed a review of the exempt/non- exempt status of several City classifications under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This review was triggered when there was employee turn -over in the Information Systems Department. This turn -over created the opportunity for the City to review the Information Systems positions against the final FLSA regulations that were issued on August 23, 2004. The results of this review determined that the Information Systems Specialist and the Senior Information Specialist should be classified as non-exempt. When the duties for these two positions were compared to the final FLSA regulations, it was determined that these classifications did not meet the criteria for exempt status. Therefore, this action will amend the City's Schedule of Authorized positions to reflect this required change. The positions of Information Specialist and Senior Information Specialist will be non-exempt and eligible for overtime compensation in accordance with the law. Finally, the Labor Attorney's Office reviewed the other exempt classifications in the City's classification plan, and no other changes were recommended. FISCAL IMPACT: This change will result in two employees now receiving overtime pay. Adequate funds are available in the Information Systems Budget to cover these new costs. ATTACHMENTS: Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions 01YATESMFIEPORTSUS Staff Exempt Status.dw City of Temecula SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS FY 04/05 Building & Safety ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR II BUILDING INSPECTOR III COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECH DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL DIRECTOR, BUILDING & SAFETY OFFICE ASSISTANT OFFICE SPECIALIST PLAN CHECKER/BLDG INSPECTOR SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR Building & Safety City Clerk ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT CENTRAL SERVICES COORDINATOR CITY CLERK/DIR OF SUPPORT SERV DEPUTY DIR OF SUPPORT SERVICES MINUTE CLERK OFFICE ASSISTANT OFFICE SPECIALIST SR. RECORDS COORDINATOR Authorized Exempt/ Count Minimum Maximum NonExempt 1.00 7.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Subtotals: 20.00 City Clerk Subtotals: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 2.00 1.00 8.50 City Council COUNCILMEMBER 5.00 City Council Subtotals: 5.00 Citv Manager\Human Resources ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ASST TO CITY MNGR/HR DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST MARKETING COORDINATOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST City Manager\Human Resources Subtotals: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE $ 3,641 $ 4,661 NE $ 3,941 $ 5,045 NE $ 3,010 $ 3,854 NE $ 5,475 $ 7,009 E $ 6,845 $ 8,761 E $ 2,020 $ 2,585 NE $ 2,178 $ 2,788 NE $ 3,941 $ 5,045 NE $ 4,344 $ 5,559 E $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE $ 2,478 $ 3,171 NE $ 6,845 $ 8,761 E $ 5,263 $ 6,739 E $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE $ 2,020 $ 2,585 NE $ 2,178 $ 2,788 NE $ 3,047 $ 3,900 NE $ 0 $ 860 NE $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE $ 9,260 $ 11,853 E $ 6,845 $ 8,761 E $ 0 $ 13,203 E $ 3,816 $ 4,885 E $ 4,199 $ 5,375 E $ 3,414 $ 4,370 E $ 4,619 $ 5,913 E $ 5,102 $ 6,531 E Page 1 of 11/16/2004 4Updated on: City or Temecula SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS FY 04105 Authorized Exempt/ Count Minimum Maximum NonExempt Community Services ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE AQUATICS SUPERVISOR 1.00 $ 3,579 $ 4,581 NE CULTURAL ARTS ADMINISTRATOR 1.00 $ 5,494 $ 7,034 E CUSTODIAN 2.00 $ 2,162 $ 2,768 NE DEPUTY DIR. OF COMMUNITY SVCS 1.00 $ 6,549 $ 8,382 E DEVELOPMENT SVCS ADMINISTRATOR 1.00 $ 5,509 $ 7,052 E DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES 1.00 $ 8,174 $ 10,463 E FACILITY MAINTENANCE COORD. 1.00 $ 2,984 $ 3,818 NE LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR 2.00 $ 3,067 $ 3,924 NE LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER 2.00 $ 3,027 $ 3,873 NE MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 1.00 $ 4,237 $ 5,423 E MAINTENANCE SUPT. - TCSD 1.00 $ 5,206 $ 6,663 E MAINTENANCE WORKER 3.00 $ 2,571 $ 3,291 NE MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.00 $ 4,619 $ 5,913 E MUSEUM SERVICES MANAGER 2.00 $ 3,679 $ 4,711 NE OFFICE SPECIALIST 3.00 $ 2,178 $ 2,788 NE PARK/LANDSCAPE MAINT SUPV 1.00 $ 4,237 $ 5,423 E RECREATION COORDINATOR 1.00 $ 2,923 $ 3,741 NE RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT 1.00 $ 5,494 $ 7,034 E RECREATION SUPERVISOR 3.00 $ 3,579 $ 4,581 NE SENIOR LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR 1.00 $ 3,525 $ 4,512 NE SENIOR RECREATION COORDINATOR 1.00 $ 3,216 $ 4,115 NE THEATRE MANAGER 1.00 $ 4,437 $ 5,680 E Community Services Subtotals: 33.00 Finance ACCOUNTANT 1.00 $ 3,717 $ 4,759 NE ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT 2.00 $ 2,404 $ 3,077 NE ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST 2.00 $ 2,781 $ 3,558 NE ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST -PAYROLL 1.00 $ 2,781 $ 3,558 NE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 1.00 $ 6,490 $ 8,309 E BUSINESS LICENSE SPEC/CASHIER 1.00 $ 2,485 $ 3,182 NE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 1.00 $ 8,174 $ 10,463 E FISCAL SERVICES MANAGER 1.00 $ 5,699 $ 7,295 E PURCHASING COORDINATOR 1.00 $ 2,781 $ 3,558 NE REVENUE MANAGER 1.00 $ 5,102 $ 6,531 E SENIOR ACCOUNTANT 1.00 $ 4,745 $ 6,074 E SENIOR DEBT ANALYST 0.50 $ 5,102 $ 6,531 E Finance Subtotals: 14.50 Fire ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE OFFICE SPECIALIST 1.00 $ 2,178 $ 2,788 NE Fire Subtotals: 2.00 Page 2 of 11/16/2004 4Updated on: City of Temecula SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS FY 04/05 Authorized Exempt/ Count Minimum Maximum NonExempt Information Systems ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION SYSTEM 1.00 $ 6,845 $ 8,761 E GIS ADMINISTRATOR 1.00 $ 4,717 $ 6,037 E GIS ANALYST 1.00 $ 3,592 $ 4,598 NE I.S. ADMINISTRATOR 2.00 $ 4,717 $ 6,037 E INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPECIALIST 1.00 $ 3,864 $ 4,946 NE SR. I.S. SPECIALIST 1.00 $ 4,237 $ 5,423 NE WEBMASTER 1.00 $ 3,592 $ 4,598 NE Information Systems Subtotals: 9.00 Planning ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE ASSISTANT PLANNER 1.00 $ 3,737 $ 4,784 NE ASSOCIATE PLANNER 6.00 $ 4,238 $ 5,424 NE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 2.00 $ 3,489 $ 4,466 NE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II 1.00 $ 3,839 $ 4,913 NE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER 1.00 $ 9,163 $ 11,729 E DEVELOPMENT PROC. COORDINATOR 1.00 $ 3,840 $ 4,915 NE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 1.00 $ 7,581 $ 9,704 E OFFICE ASSISTANT 2.00 $ 2,020 $ 2,585 NE OFFICE SPECIALIST 2.00 $ 2,178 $ 2,788 NE PRINCIPAL PLANNER 3.00 $ 6,154 $ 7,878 E SENIOR PLANNER 1.00 $ 5,353 $ 6,852 E Planning Subtotals: 22.00 Police MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.00 $ 4,619 $ 5,913 E Police Subtotals: 1.00 Page 3 of 11/16/2004 4Updated on: City of Temecula SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS FY 04/05 Authorized Exempt/ Count Minimum Maximum NonExempt Public Works ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 $ 2,888 $ 3,697 ASSISTANT ENGINEER 7.00 $ 4,177 $ 5,349 ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 8.00 $ 4,912 $ 6,287 CIP SPECIALIST 0.75 $ 3,317 $ 4,246 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 1.00 $ 4,999 $ 6,616 DEPUTY DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS 1.00 $ 7,329 $ 9,381 DIR OF PUB WORKS/CITY ENG 1.00 $ 9,163 $ 11,729 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 1.00 $ 2,822 $ 3,613 JUNIOR ENGINEER 1.00 $ 3,247 $ 4,156 LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER 4.00 $ 3,027 $ 3,873 MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 1.00 $ 4,237 $ 5,423 MAINTENANCE SUPT. - P/W 1.00 $ 5,206 $ 6,663 MAINTENANCE WORKER 5.00 $ 2,571 $ 3,291 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.00 $ 4,619 $ 5,913 OFFICE ASSISTANT 3.00 $ 2,020 $ 2,585 OFFICE SPECIALIST 3.00 $ 2,178 $ 2,788 PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 3.00 $ 6,597 $ 8,444 PROPERTY AGENT 1.00 $ 4,912 $ 6,287 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 2.00 $ 3,671 $ 4,699 SENIOR ENGINEER 2.00 $ 5,792 $ 7,414 SENIOR PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 4.00 $ 4,221 $ 5,403 SENIOR SIGNAL TECHNICIAN 1.00 $ 4,237 $ 5,423 SPECIAL PROJECTS ENGINEER 1.00 $ 4,912 $ 6,287 Public Works Subtotals: 53.75 Redevelopment ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DIR OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.00 Redevelopment Subtotals: 3.00 Totals: Building & Safety 20.00 City Clerk 8.50 City Council 5.00 City Manager 9.00 Community Services 33.00 Finance 14.50 Fire 2.00 Information Systems 9.00 Planning 22.00 Police 1.00 Public Works 53.75 Redevelopment 3.00 Total of Authorized Positions: 180.75 1.00 1.00 $ 2,888 $ 7,581 $ 4,619 $ 3,697 $ 9,704 $ 5,913 NE NE E NE E E E NE NE NE E E NE E NE NE E E NE E NE NE E NE E E Page 4 of 11/16/2004 4Updated on: ITEM 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE - - ---- CITY MANAGER ------ TO: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council �q/� / FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance)J/v DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Purchase of Six (6) City Vehicles PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1) Approve the purchase of the following vehicles from Paradise Chevrolet: One (1) 2005, Sedan Impala One (1) 2005, SUV Trailblazer $17,457.78 $27,208.87 2) Approve the purchase of the following vehicles from Carriage Motor Company: Two (2) 2005, 2WD GMC Sierra Pick-up Trucks $17,801.38 (each) One (1) 2005, 4WD % ton GMC Sierra Pick-up Truck $24,670.95 One (1) 2005, 1 ton Cargo Van $20,131.67 DISCUSSION: The adoption of the fiscal year 2004/05 Annual Operating Budget approved the funding for the purchase of six (6) vehicles. The six (6) vehicles are additions to the current fleet and will be used by the Community Services District (1), Public Works, CIP Division (1), Fire (1) and Building and Safety (3). On October 25, 2004 the Requests for Proposal (RFPs) were mailed to all of the local dealerships for the purchase of the six (6) vehicles (see attached vendor list). Three (3) proposals were received as listed below. Based on previous purchases the received bids are considered competitive and are recommended by staff. The low bids are under the budgeted amounts and the purchase of these vehicles will satisfy the vehicular requirements for the identified departments. Building and Safety Department One (1) Four Door Sedan Dealer Paradise Chevrolet Carriage Motor Company Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge Vehicle/Model Four Door Impala Four Door Buick LaSabre Four Door Chrysler 300 Price $17,457.78 (low bid) $20,662.14 $23,186.72 Public Works Department One (1) SUV 4WD Four Door Dealer Vehicle/Model Price Paradise Chevrolet Mid -Size SUV 4WD Four Door $27,208.87 (low bid) Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge Mid -Size SUV 4WD Four Door $28,325.78 Carriage Motor Company Mid -Size SUV 4WD Four Door $31,562.49 Building and Safety Department Two (212WD % ton Pick-up Trucks Dealer Carriage Motor Company Paradise Chevrolet Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge Fire Department One (1) %ton 4WD Pick-Uo Truck Dealer Carriage Motor Company Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge Paradise Chevrolet Community Services District One (1) 1 ton Cargo Van Vehicle/Model Two (2) 2WD GMC 1500 Sierra Pick- up Truck Two (2) 2WD Chevy 1500 Pick-up Truck Two (2) 2WD 1500 Quad Pick-up Truck Vehicle/Model Full-size Y44 ton Pick-up Full-size 1/4 ton Pick-up Full-size 3/4 ton Pick-up Price $17,801.38 (low bid) $18,313.20 $18,712.94 Price 4WD Extended Cab $24,670.95 (low bid) 4WD Extended Cab $25,170.40 4WD Extended Cab $25,775.71 Dealer Vehicle/Model Price Carriage Motor Company 1 ton GMC 3500 Cargo Van $20,131.67 (low bid) Paradise Chevrolet 1 ton Chevy 3500 Cargo Van $21,022.29 Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge 1 ton Cargo Van No Bid FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Vehicle Internal Service Fund for this purchase. Adequate funds are also budgeted in the respective departments for depreciation expense. ATTACHMENT: Vehicle Vendor List 2 Vehicle Vendor List Carriage Motors 41872 Motor Car Pkwy Temecula Ca 92591 Norm Reeves 26755 Ynez Road Temecula Ca 92591 Rancho Ford 26895 Ynez Road Temecula Ca 92591 Saturn of Temecula 27540 Ynez Road Temecula. Ca 92591 Toyota of Temecula 26631 Ynez Road Temecula Ca 92591 Paradise Chevrolet 26845 Ynez Road Temecula Ca 92591 Nissan of Temecula 41895 Motor Car Pkwy Temecula Ca 92591 ITEM 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE' CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Cou lrA FROM: Debbie Ubnosk , irector of Planning DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Appointment to Weed Abatement Appeals Board PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Principal Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint the standing Chairs of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and the Community Services Commission to the Weed Abatement Appeals Board. BACKGROUND: Chapter 8.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code requires each property owner to abate hazardous vegetation that may constitute a fire hazard. If the property owner does not remove the hazardous vegetation in a timely manner, the City's Code Enforcement Division authorizes forced abatement through a private contractor. The property owner has the right to appeal if they believe that the City is in error regarding the abatement of hazardous vegetation on their property. Section 8.16.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code delineates the appeal procedure. An appeals board must convene to hear the appeal. The composition of the board consists of one Fire Department Officer selected by the fire chief and two persons selected by the City Council. Recently, an appeal was filed with the City regarding weed abatement and there is a need to select the appeals board. Staff suggests that the Council appoint the standing chair of both the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and the Community Services Commission. Appeals are infrequent and board would most likely meet once a year during weed abatement season to hear appeals. Staff envisions that the chairman of the above two committees would have an additional d uty to s it o n the a ppeals board a nd a II f uture chairman of these two committees would have this duty during their tenure. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None RABROW NS\Code\weed abatefnehW eed Abatement Appeals Board CC Staffryt 11-20-04.doc ITEM 9 ORDINANCE NO. 04-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE "TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) ZONING DOCUMENT TO PERMIT THE SALE OF ALCOHOL IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL PLANNING AREA, AND OTHER MINOR TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR CLARIFICATION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay as described below. A. Add the listing for `Incidental alcoholic beverage sales" and modify the listings for Convenience Market, Restaurants and other eating establishments in Table 17.22.136B of the Temecula Municipal Code with the following: Table 17.22.136B Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use PDO-411 PDO-4 Blueprint, Copying and Duplicating Service P P Convenience market (without the sale of alcoholic beverages) P Convenience market (with the sale of alcoholic beverages) C Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an C C otherwise allowable use Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club Restaurants and other eating establishments (with or without the P P4 sale of beer and wine) Restaurants and other eating establishments (with the sale of C4 beer, wine, and distilled spirits) Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment C B. Footnote Number 1 has been revised to show the correct Code citation. C. The original footnotes 3 and 4 have been deleted because these uses were not permitted and were inconsistent with the Development Code. D. The remaining footnotes have been renumbered 1-6 as shown below: 1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.10.020(B), special standards for the sale of alcoholic beverages. 2. Subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 3. In PDO-4, all senior housing residential projects shall use the development and RJOrds 2004/Orris 04-14 performance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions contained in Section 17.06.050.H. 4. The size of the use or activity is limited to 5,000 square feet. 5. Outdoor entertainment in conjunction with an eating establishment is permitted provided that the outside noise levels do not interfere with off -site conversation. 6. Drive through facilities are not allowed in the Village Planning Area. Section 2. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 3. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. Section S. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of November, 2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R /Ords 2004/Ords 04-14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 04-14 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the g`" day of November, 2004 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of November, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RJOrds 2004/Ords 04-14 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT NOVEMBER 9, 2004 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:32 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Stone, and Washington ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Roberts Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 2004. Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for Project No. PW04-15CSD - Erie Stanley Gardner Exhibit RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW04-15CSD - Erie Stanley Gardner Exhibit. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 -2. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Director Roberts who was absent. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No additional comments. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT Commending the Community Services and Public Works Departments for its efforts associated with the completion of the Veterans' Memorial, General Manager Nelson invited the public to the dedication ceremony at the Duck Pond on Thursday, November, 11, 2004, at 2:00 P.M. Mr. RAMin utes.csd\110904 Nelson also apprised the public of another upcoming dedication ceremony at the Duck Pond on Friday, November 19, 2004, for the Japanese Friendship Garden. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS President Washington echoed his appreciation and gratitude to staff for the hard work associated with the completion of the Veterans' Memorial and as well extended his gratitude to Mr. David Micheal for his volunteer efforts. Director Comerchero commented on the 16 letters of actual letters written by veterans displayed at the memorial and encouraged the public to take the time to read these touching letters. ADJOURNMENT At 7:37 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, November 9, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chuck Washington, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] RAMinutes.csd\110904 ITEM 2 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FI CITY MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: I Herman Parker, Director of Community Services 44 illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for Geotechnical and Material Testing Services, and Special Inspection — Petra Geotechnical, Inc. Wolf Creek Sports Complex, Project No. PW01-17CSD PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Bill McAteer, Construction Manager- Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Approve an agreement with Petra Geotechnical, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $91,015.00 to provide as needed geotechnical, material testing services, and special inspection for the Wolf Creek Sports Complex, Project No. PW01-17CSD, and authorize the President to execute the agreement. 2. Authorize the General Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the contingency amount of $9,101.00, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. BACKGROUND: The Wolf Creek Sports Complex, Project No. PW01-17CSD will require geotechnical, materials testing, and special inspection services. The contract with Petra Geotechnical, Inc. will provide the needed professional services for the project. On September 28, 2004, the Board of Directors awarded a construction contract for the Wolf Creek Sports Complex Improvements, Project No. PW01-17CSD, to Douglas E. Barnhardt, Inc. Thereafter, City staff evaluated seven proposals received for geotechnical, materials testing, and special inspection services for the subject project. Petra Geotechnical, Inc. was selected to provide the needed services based upon their experience with similar projects, previous work performed for the City, and their expertise with specific task assignments. This Professional Services Agreement with Petra Geotechnical, Inc. is for an amount not to exceed $91,015.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The Wolf Creek Sports Complex Project is funded through Development Impact Fees (Parks and Recreation and Quimby), Certificates of Participation Bond Proceeds, Capital Project Reserves, Proposition 40, Community Facilities District (Wolf Creek) and Developer Contributions. The total authorization for this request is $100,106 which includes the agreement amount of $91,015.00 plus a 10% contingency amount of $9,101.00. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 210-190-173-5805. R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\PWO1-17CSD Geotech.agr.tloc ATTACHMENTS: Project Location Project Description Agreement with Petra Geotechnical, Inc. RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004\112304\PW01-17CSD Geotech.agr.doc MO 0 M t` •, w „ o N 69 t 6 s a a l— O O O W M O O O U U � 69 604 69 69 69 6H 0 0 N O O N 0 0 N C O O 0 0 0 0 0 N M M EA 69 l� O O O DO v M N h O O l— O M O O N 7 O� p O M M'I M N M 6A 69 69 6s 6s Fls 0 0 e d o 00 M W A d ds es es 6,s to o W U U A H h U M vl M D\ O O O O M M l� Vl O O O O a c o o v d' N O N �D O� l-N �O M .4 .. Oi .�. 69 6s 69 69 69 6A 69I69II a O a c � u x w N PG O w G v X -or 3 O ti N y N Q 'r1 y ti u A a o�OR o AA u ULCUf�F+ N N AGREEMENT PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIAL SERVICES WOLF CREEK SPORTS COMPLEX PROJECT NO. PW 01-17CSD THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of November 23, 2004, between the Temecula Community Services District, City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("District") and Petra Geotechnical Inc.,("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on November 23, 2004, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2006, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the Board of Directors has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations' Internet web site at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall paythe adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5,1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 5. PAYMENT. a. The District agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of p ayment a s s et f orth i n E xhibit A, P ayment R ates a nd Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit A other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Ninety One Thousand Fifteen Dollars and No Cents ($91,015.00 ) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the General Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by R:\CIP\Proiects\PW01-171Hareement\Petra Geotech aar General Manager and Consultant at the time District's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The General Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the Board of Director. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the District disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The District may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the District suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the District shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the District. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the District pursuant to Section 4. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, District shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the General Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the District shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by District that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi- R:\CIPtProjects\PW01-17Wgreement\Petra Geotech agr fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of District or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give District the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit District to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained fora period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computerfiles containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the District and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the District without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the District, upon reasonable written request by the District, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the District, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the District. 10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 1185 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional L iability I nsurance s hall b e w ritten o n a p olicy f orm providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: R:\CIP\Projects\PW01-17\Agreement\Petra Geotech agr (1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the General Manager. At the option of the General Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the D istrict, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self - insured maintained by the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respectto the limits of the insurer's liability. R:\CIP\Projects\PW01-17\Hgreement\Petra Geotech agr (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either parry, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the District. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the District. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the District with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the District. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the District's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the District a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither District nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the District. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against District, or bind District in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, District shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for District. District shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The District, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without District's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the General Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the General. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives District notice of such court order or subpoena. R:\CIP\Projects\PW01-17\Agreement\Petra Geotech agr b. Consultant shall promptly notify District should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the District. District retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with District and to provide District with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, District's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by District to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (1) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To District: City of Temecula Temecula Community Services District Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: General Manager To Consultant: Petra Geotechnical Services, Inc. 41640 Corning Place, Suite 107 Murrieta, California 92562 Attention: Grayson Walker 15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without priorwritten consent ofthe District. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the Board of Directors and the Consultant. 16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 17. GOVERNING LAW. The District and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the Temecula Community Services District, City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights underthis Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the Temecula Community Services District, Cityof Temecula shall have anyfinancial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the District that no officer or employee of the Temecula Community Services District, City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the District in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. R:\CIP\Projects\PW01-17Wgreement\Petra Geotech agr IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA Chuck Washington, President Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Petra Geotechnical Services, Inc. 41640 Corning Place, Suite 107 Murrieta, California 92562 (951) 600-9271 Siamak Jafroudi, Owner Robert Ruff, Co -Owner (Two Signatures of Corporate Officers Required For Corporations) R:\CIPtProjectstPW01-17V+greementtPetra Geotech agr EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED And PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIAL SERVICES WOLF CREEK SPORTS COMPLEX PROJECT NO. PW 01-17CSD R:\CIP\Projects\PW01-lMgreement\Petra Geotech agr PETRA OFFICES IN THE COUNTIES OF ORANGE • SAN DIEGO • RIVERSIDE • LOS ANGELES • SAN BERNARDINO November 10, 2004 P.N.1649-04 Mr. Bill McAteer CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589-9033 Subject: Proposal to Provide Geotechnical and Laboratory Material Testing Services During Rough -Grading and Post -Grading Operations, Wolf Creek Sports Complex, Project No. PW01-17CSD, City of Temecula, Riverside County, California Petra Geotechnical, Inc. (Petra) is pleased to submit this proposal for providing geoteclmical engineering and engineering geologic field and laboratory services during rough -grading and post -grading operations for the subject site. In preparing this proposal, we have performed the following. • Geotechnical review of the Ninyo & Moore geotechnical investigation report for the site dated July 2, 2003. • Review of construction plans prepared by RJM Design Group, Inc. and project specifications. • Consulted with you to discuss the scope with regard to approximate time frame for rough grading and the scope of services during post grading. • In-house consultation with senior personnel to evaluate project requirements so that we may provide estimated fees for our services that are both realistic and complete. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES Our services will include professional geotechnical, laboratory materials and special inspection testing services for the Wolf Creek Sports Complex. Services will be provided for grading (overexcavation and backfill), utilities, sewer line and storm drain, asphalt paving, concrete PETRA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 41640 Corning Place • Suite 107 . Murrieta • CA 92562 • Tel: (909) 600-9271 • Fax. (909) 600-9215 CITY OF TEMECULA Wolf Creek Sports Complex/Temecula November 10, 2004 P.N.1649-04 Page 2 paving, concrete curb and gutter, concrete walks, retaining walls, lighting foundations and concession, restroom and maintenance building construction. The project will be completed within 280 days. Scone of Services Petra will provide the geotechnical and laboratory material testing and special inspection required, including furnishing labor, equipment materials, tools, supervision and services required to complete the work specified in the RFP. Our scope of services will be as follows. • Review project plans and specifications regarding geotechnical and laboratory materials testing services. • Provide geotechnical consultation and attend progress meetings, as required. • During grading operations, provide an experienced soil technician and geologist to observe and document removals and test and document compaction of fill. • Daily field reports documenting the name of the technician, type of service, hours worked and a summary of the operations. Reports will be submitted on a daily basis. • Provide field observation and testing during trench backfilling. • Provide field density testing during subgrade and base compaction. • Provide field sampling and testing of base and asphalt concrete. • Laboratory testing to support field services. • Preparation of field and final compaction reports, as required. • Provide batch plant inspections, if requested (optional service). • Provide structure backfrll observation and testing. • Perform concrete sampling and testing. • Provide special inspection services. 0 CITY OF TEMECULA November 10, 2004 Wolf Creek Sports Complex/Temecula P.N. 1649-04 Page 3 ESTIMATE OF FEES Our rough -grading and post -grading services are expected to be performed on both a full-time and part-time basis, respectively. Our fee greatly depends on the duration of the project, project coordination, quality of the work, subsurface soil condition and the number of times our professional, supervisory and field personnel are required to visit the site, which are beyond our control. Therefore, Petra proposes to charge for our services on a time - and -cost basis in accordance with our Amended Standard Fee Schedule — Public Works Support (Prevailing Wage Projects; attached). The scope of services provided within this proposal was based on previous discussions with you, on in-house consultation among some of our senior personnel and on certain assumptions that had to be made. Please carefully review our anticipated scope of services and assumptions and contact us regarding questions or changes that may be required. Rough Grading Based on our experience, we have determined that we will need one full-time senior engineering technician for the rough -grading portion of the project and a part-time geologist/engineer during rough grading related to overexcavation operations and geologic mapping. Additional meetings, additional reports, plan review, retesting of unsatisfactory work, overtime, weekend work, holiday work or other work not described above is not included in our estimate and would be billed as additional services on a time -and -cost basis in accordance with our Amended Standard Fee Schedule. A separate proposal for such services can be provided upon request. The following table provides the task, personnel, hours and rates to complete rough -grading CITY OF TEMECULA Wolf Creek Sports Complex/Temecula November 10, 2004 P.N.1649-04 Page 4 Task; Sernce Title/Test Estimated Rate/:. Toth] Hours Hour, 1 Review Project Plans and Specifications Project Engineer 4 $105 $420.00 Geotechnical Consultation (if needed) Project Engineer 10 $105 $1,050.00 2 Attend Pre -Grade and Progress Meetings Field Operations 20 $95 $1,900.00 3 Supervisor Field Services Senior Engineering 380 $70 $26,600.00 Technician 4 Project Geologist 40 $105 $4,200.00 Laboratory Testing Maximum Density 5 tests $125 $625.00 Sieve Analysis 2 tests $85 $170.00 5 Expansion Index 4 tests $85 $340.00 Corrosion 4tests $160 $640.00 R-Value 2 tests $200 $400.00 Project Management/Site Visits Project Engineer 6 $105 $630.00 6 Preparation of Grading Report Principal Engineer 6 $135 $810.00 7 Project Geologist 12 $105 $1,260.00 Drafts erson 8 $70 $560.00 TOTAL $39,605.00 Post Grading Post -grading services performed on a part-time basis are expected to generally vary from 2 to 4 hours per site visit, depending on the service that is needed. Furthemlore, some full-time service will also occasionally be needed. Meetings, additional reports, retesting of unsatisfactory materials testing, overtime, weekend work, holiday work or other work not described above is not included in our estimate and would be billed as additional service on a time -and -cost basis in accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule - Public Works Support (Prevailing Wage Projects). A separate proposal for such services can be provided upon request. Based on our knowledge of the site, jurisdictional requirements and the RFP, the following table provides the tasks, personnel, rates and hours to complete post -grading services. CITY OF TEMECULA Wolf Creek Sports Complex/Temecula November 10, 2004 P.N. 1649-04 Page 5 Task, . Service'" �- TiNeaest Estimated Hours Rate/ Hour Total. Utility -Trench Backfill, Curb, Gutter 1 and Walk-Subgrade and Aggregate Base Engineering Technician 290 $60 $17,400.00 Observation and Testing Sampling and Analysis — Backfill, Soil, Aggregate Base, Asphalt Concrete - Soil technician Engineering Technician 4 $60 $240.00 2 - Laboratory testing — soil Maximum Density 4 tests $125 $500.00 Sieve Analysis 4 tests $85 $340.00 Laboratory Testing — Asphalt Hveem density 2 tests $75 $150.00 Extraction 2 tests $75 $150.00 Gradation 2 tests $45 $90.00 Street Subgrade, Aggregate Base and Engineering Technician 24 $60 $1,440.00 ' Paving/Observation and Testing Special Inspector 4 - Structural Concrete, Welding, Masonry Special Inspector 320 $65 $20,800.00 Laboratory Testing - concrete Concrete cylinders 150 tests $16/test $2,400.00 - Aggregate Fine Sieve analysis 2 tests $45/test $90.00 5 Coarse Sieve analysis 2 tests $40/test $80.00 Fine Specific gravity 2 tests $45/test $90.00 Coarse Specific gravity 2 tests $40/test $80.00 - Mortar/Grout Sieve analysis 2 tests $85/test $170.00 Cylinders 60 tests $16/ $960.00 cylinder Field Meetings and Quality Control 6 - Senior engineering technician Field Operations Supervisor 24 $95 $2,280.00 Report Preparation Principal Engineer 6 $135 $910.00 Field Operations 24 $95 $2,280.00 7 Supervisor Sr. Assoc. Geologist 4 $125 $500.00 Drafrsman 8 $70 $560.00 TOTAL $51,410.00 0 CITY OF TEMECULA Wolf Creek Sports Complex/Temecula Optional Services November 10, 2004 P.N.1649-04 Page 6 Estimated,Ratej TOtatT z *• st r •y 1 �I. s-'°' Servtce� n; TIiIC:3= .s ? Hoo"r's; Houi;. w Batch Plant Inspector Special Inspector 8 $65 $520.00 It should be noted that these estimated man hours are considered tentative based on the information provided. Please contact us prior to the execution of this proposal to refine our assumptions. If necessary, a revised man-hour estimate can be provided. Please note that travel time and minimums will not be charged to the project. In addition, no special charges for nuclear gauges and vehicles will be billed. It should be noted that our fee estimate is based on information previously provided. Should the contractor utilize manpower and equipment that would require additional technicians, we will prepare a field memo for your project representative that outlines the need for these services. Furthermore, a letter will be prepared for your project manager for approval, which will outline the details of the extra services required along with associated fees. INVOICES AND PAYMENT Petra will submit detailed invoices to you for payment on a monthly basis. Invoices will specify the actual fees accrued during the billing period, which is the first of the month though the end of the month. Invoices for geotechnical and materials testing services will reference the specific tasks for which the fees were accrued. Indirect costs, such as equipment, materials and subcontracted work, will also be included. The invoices are due and payable on or before 30 days after the date of the invoice. AUTHORIZATION The opportunity to present this proposal is sincerely appreciated. If this proposal and the attached "Exhibit A - Conditions" meet with your approval, please sign below and Page 3 of It CITY OF TEMECULA Wolf Creek Sports Complex/Temecula November 10, 2004 P.N.1649-04 Page 7 Exhibit "A" - Conditions and return a copy of this proposal to our office or provide us with your Agreement for Professional Consultant Services. If you have questions regarding the content or terminology of this proposal or conditions, please contact us at your convenience. Revisions must be agreed upon by both parties prior to commencement of work. Respectfully submitted, PETRA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. V Cliffor A. Craft, GE Principal Engineer GE 243 CAC/RLG/kec Fee Estimite $91;015.00 Approved By: (Please Sign Exhibit "A" Page 3) Date: Fee Eshtnate Optional Services $520 00 k Approved By: (Please Sign Exhibit "A" Page 3) Date: Attachment: Amended Standard Fee Schedule - Public Works Support (Prevailing Wage Projects) Exhibit "A" — Conditions Distribution: (2) Addressee Wr AMENDED STANDARD FEE SCHEDULE PUBLIC WORKS SUPPORT (PREVAILING WAGE PROJECTS) January 1,2004 Principal Engineer/Geologist $135.00/lu. Senior Associate Engineer/Geologist $125.00/hr- Associate Engineer/Geologist $115.00/lu. Senior Project Engineer/Geologist $110.00/hr. Project Engineer/Geologist $105.00/h r. Senior Staff Engineer/Geologist $ 95.00/lu'. Staff Engineer/Geologist $ 85.00/hr $95.00/lu. Field Operations Supervisor $70.00/hr* Senior Engineering Technician $ 60.00/lu'.* Soils Field Technician $ 65.00/hr. Deputy Inspector $ 65.00/hr. Building Construction Inspector $ 85.00/hr. Senior Laboratory Technician $ 65.00/11r. Laboratory Technician $ 70.00/hr. Draftsperson $ .25/sheet Xerox Rate Cost + 20% Outside Consultants Cost + 20% Drilling/Equipment Rental Cost + 20% Postage/Freight Cost + 20 /� Blueprints Cost Travel & Transportation Cost Subsistence Company Equipment Usage No Charge Mileage/Truck Usage No Charge Word Processing/Clerical No Charge * Costs for Field Density Testing are included. It CITY OF TEMECULA November 10, 2004 Wolf Creek Sports Complex/Temecula P.N. 1649-04 Page 1 EXHIBIT "A" - CONDITIONS RIGHT OF ENTRY The Client will provide for right of entry of Petra Geoteclmical, Incorporated (Petra) personnel, as well as all equipment and other personnel necessary in order to complete the work. Petra will take reasonable precautions to minimize any disturbance to, damage to, or accumulation of excavation spoils on the property, but it is understood by the Client that in the normal course of work some disturbance and damage may occur and some spoils may be generated, the restoration and correction of which is not part of this Agreement. The Client accepts this fact and will not hold Petra responsible for any disturbance and damage other than that caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct of Petra or its personnel. UTILITIES In the prosecution of this work, Petra will take all reasonable precautions to avoid damage or injury to subterranean structures or utilities. The Client understands that all such structures or utilities will not be known to Petra, and agrees not to hold Petra responsible for damage to subterranean structures or utilities which are not called to Petra's attention and fully and accurately described and located on the plans furnished. STANDARD OF CARE Services performed by Petra under this agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession providing similar services at the same time under the same conditions and locality. The Client acknowledges that subsurface conditions can vary from conditions encountered at the location where borings or explorations are made by Petra and that the data, interpretations of the data, and reconu tendations of Petra are based solely on the information, which was available to Petra. Petra will not be responsible for any interpretation by others of data or information developed. The data obtained during the investigative phase is subject to confirmation by conditions, which are encountered during the construction. The Client warrants that all information supplied by Client to Petra for their use in completing its services under this Agreement are accurate and sufficient for use by Petra, and that Petra can rely on their completeness and accuracy. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Services provided by Petra may, at time, require subsurface explorations in areas where hazardous materials may be encountered. The Client acknowledges and warrants that Client has no knowledge of, or reason to suspect, that hazardous materials are present at the subj ect site. Should hazardous materials be present or subsequently discovered, whether they are known or unknown by Petra, Client agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Petra, its officers, employees, and agents or subcontractors from all claims which result, or are alleged in whole or in part, to the fault of Petra in providing their services that involves, in whole or in part, the presence of hazardous materials. The Client also agrees to compensate Petra for any and all time and/or expenses incurred by Petra in defense of any claim; for storage, transportation and disposal of contaminated samples; and for disposal of contaminated consumables and/or decontamination of equipment. All such compensation shall be based upon Petra's prevailing "Schedule of Fees." it CITY OF TEMECULA November 10, 2004 Wolf Creek Sports Complex/Temecula P.N. 1649-04 Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" - CONDITIONS Petra reserves the right to unilaterally suspend or terminate all services under this Agreement at its sole discretion in the event that hazardous materials are discovered. If Petra's services are terminated or suspended, Petra agrees to negotiate in good faith a new agreement to continue to meet Client's needs. DISPUTES In the event any bill or portion thereof is disputed by Client, Client shall notify Petra within ten days of receipt of the bill in questions, and Client and Petra shall work together to resolve the matter within 30 days of its being called to Petra's attention. If resolution of the matter is not attained within 30 days, either party may terminate this Agreement in accordance with conditions indicated below (see "Termination of Agreement"). If Client for any reason fails to pay the undisputed portion of Petra's invoices within 30 days of presentation, Petra shall cease work on the project and Client shall waive any claim against Petra, and shall defend and indemnify Petra from and against any claims for injury or loss stemming from Petra's cessation of service. Client shall also pay Petra the cost associated with premature project demobil- ization. In the event the project is remobilized, Client shall also pay the cost of remobilization, and shall renegotiate appropriate contract terms and conditions, such as those associated with budget, schedule, or scope of service. Neither the Client nor Petra may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer his or its duties or interest in this Agreement without the prior express written consent of the other party. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY In recognition of the relative risks and benefits of the project to both the Client and Petra, the risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to hunt the liability of PGI and its subconsultants to the Client and to all construction contractors and subcontractors on the project for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages or any nature whatsoever or claims expenses from any cause or causes, so that the total aggregate liability of Petra and its subconsultants to all those named shall not exceed $50,000.00, or Petra's total fee for services rendered on this project, whichever is greater. Such claims and causes include, but are not limited to, negligence, professional errors or omissions, strict liability, breach of contract or warranty. Client and Petra acknowledge that this provision was expressly negotiated and agreed upon. Further, client specifically agrees, without regard to any limitation of liability amount set forth above, to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Petra and its agents, employees, and consultants from and against all claims brought by or on behalf of third parties including any damages, losses and expenses, including attorneys fees arising out of or in any way relating to Petra's work. Such claims include but are not limited to all claims demands, or liability for any error, omission or other negligence, including but not limited, to, theories based upon negligence, professional negligence, strict liability, warranty or breach of contract. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement shall apply regardless of any active and/or passive negligent act or omission on the part of Petra, its agents, employees or consultants, but shall not apply to claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of same. CITY OF TEMECULA November 10, 2004 Wolf Creek Sports Cornplex/Temecula P.N. 1649-04 Page 3 EXHIBIT "A"- CONDITIONS For an additional fee of $750.00 or five percent (5%), whichever is greater, of the fees paid by the Client to Petra for the project, Petra agrees to increase the total aggregate liability of Petra and its subconsultants to all those named to a mutually agreed upon amount not to exceed $ [_Client's Initials] TERMINATION Either the Client or Petra may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause upon giving the other party 10 calendar days prior written notice. The Client shall within 30 calendar days of termination notice pay Petra for all services rendered and all costs incurred up to the date of termination, in accordance with the compensation provisions of this contract. Petra will provide to the Client a copy of the work product generated to the point of termination of this agreement within 10 days from receipt of full compensation for the work performed to the date of temunation. The Client agrees to hold Petra harmless from any claims against Petra arising out of any future work provided by replacement consultants should the Client or Petra terminate their Agreement prior to completion of services and the Client then proceeding with the project. I/We have read this proposal and Exhibit "A" - Conditions, agree to the terms and conditions set forth, and authorize work to proceed. These terms and conditions as set forth are binding upon those ordering and/or authorizing this work, and on the assigns or successors in interest. NAME OF CLIENT (Please Print) ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE TELEPHONE LENDER/CITY SIGNATURE OF CLIENT/AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE ITEM 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER 0 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services 1 William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for Civil Engineering Design Services— Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation Margarita Road Under Crossing - Project No. PW04-13 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Brian Guillot, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve an agreement with Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation in an amount not to exceed $114,426.00 to provide professional civil engineering design services for Margarita Road Undercrossing, Project No. PW04-13, and authorize the President to execute the agreement. 2. Authorize the General Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the contingency amount of $11,442.60, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. 3. Approve the acceleration of funding from the FY 2005-06 Capital Improvement Program budget in the amount of $56,000.00, to the FY 2004-05 Capital Improvement Program budget. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to a cooperative agreement with Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, the City operates and maintains a Class I Bike Lane/Multipurpose Trail within the Santa Gertrudis Creek channel. The trail consists of an approximately 3-mile section of asphalt concrete paved surface along the south side of the creek channel. This project continues the efforts to provide added safety for trail users and eliminate the need to cross major streets that intersect the trail. The City constructed an undercrossing at Winchester Road similar to one proposed for this project at Margarita Road. On June 8, 2004, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2005-2009 Capital Improvement Program, which includes a project entitled Multi -Trails System -Citywide. The project scope identifies the construction of a new trail segment that would include the undercrossing at Margarita Road. The project will provide continuous, safe access under Margarita Road connecting schools and residential areas. On August 31, 2004, the Public Works Department requested proposals from several civil engineering design firms to provide professional services for the Margarita Road undercrossing at Santa Gertrudis RIAGENDA REPORTS\2004U 12304\PW04-13LAN.Agr. DOC Creek. On September 23, 2004 the City received four proposals, which were thereafter evaluated by City Staff. Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation (LAN) was selected to provide the needed services based upon the unique qualifications of their staff, their demonstrated capability with similar projects in the Inland Empire, and their demonstrated project understanding. FISCAL IMPACT: The professional services forthe Margarita Road Undercrossing will be funded through Development Impact Fees — Open Space, and Senate Bill 821 funding. The total authorization for this professional services agreement is $125,868.60, which includes the agreement in the amount of $114,426.00 plus a 10% contingency of $11,442.60. To fully fund the design services agreement and provide adequate funds for administration, it is necessary to accelerate $56,000.00 from the project's FY2005-2006 appropriation. Within this acceleration of funds, adequate funds will be available in Account No. 210-190-185-5802. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description 3. Agreement with Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004U 12304\PW04-13LAN.A9r. DOC RFP No. 131 Margarita Road Under Crossing EXHIBIT "B" LOCATION MAP MARGARITA ROAD UNDER CROSSING Exhibit"B" RWM131 Margarita Road Undemroaaing\RFP131.doc n G W F u d i q 4 00 o� N 0 0 00 0 0 y F° 0 0 0 a yaoo�� y y U ds F» ss En v � C3 h 03 w o ov y �•y � U . O 00 N y ❑ O q y d O N b O � ❑� N U a N yy O r' o 0 N to 0 C b o N O O O O p O p O CA h O •--� N b 00 N cc: O b9 b9 69 0 0� ob o 0 0 N b" 'NO O O O O C C N 00 N z •� y h a A+ N O l'i V V � .m /.. 69 69 69.. 0. o " w O O '00 N U N 0 0 _I -S `� o o C 0o y V of w o b q , O N kn r 0 q W U w O or fJ. 69 69 69 P. N Y o oEn o.W FL Cd o W Uaq�nF h O O q a u R� u 4: gb u u d A� v FC o F �UAF O O 7 Wto 0 b 00 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES MARGARITA ROAD UNDER CROSSING PROJECT NO. PW04-13 THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of November 23, 2004, between the Temecula Community Services District, District of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("District") and Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on November 23, 2004, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than November 23, 2006, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently, and to the best of his or her ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the Board of Directors has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations' Internet web site at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8,1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 5. PAYMENT. a. The District agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One Hundred Fourteen Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and No Cents ($114,426.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. r:\CIP\Projects1PW04-13tLim&Nascimento Pyr b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the General Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by General Manager and Consultant at the time District's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The General Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement or $25,000.00, but in no event shall the total sum of the agreement exceed twenty - five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this a mount s hall b e approved by the Board of Directors. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The District may at anytime for any reason with or without cause suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the Districts suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the District shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the District pursuant to Section 4. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, District shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the General Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its defaultwithin such period of time, the District shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. r:\CIP\Projects\PW04-13\Lim&Nascimento qqr 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by District that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of District or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give District the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit District to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the District and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the District without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent orwrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 1185 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. r:\CIP\Projects\PW04-13\Lim&Nascimento qqr (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) peroccurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Workers Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Anydeductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the General Manager. At the option of the General Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. r:\CIP\Projects\PW04-13\Lim&Nascimento Agr (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' priorwritten notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the District. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the District. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Covera-ge. Consultant shall furnish the District with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the District. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. As an alternative to the District's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the District a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither District in or any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as setforth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the District. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against District, or bind District in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, District shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for District. District shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. r:\CIP\Projects\PW04-13\Lim&Nascimento Agr 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without District's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the General Manager or unless requested bythe CityAttomey, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any projector property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives District notice of such court order orsubpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify District should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. District retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with District and to provide District with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, District's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by District to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (1) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Temecula Community Services District Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: General Manager To Consultant: Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation 1887 Business Center Drive, 2nd Floor, Suite 6 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Attention: Peter Lim, Chief Executive Officer r:\CIP\Projects\PW04-13\Lim&Nascimento Agr 15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination oras may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the Board of Directors and the Consultant. 16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 17. GOVERNING LAW. The District and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal court with geographic jurisdiction over the Temecula Community Service District of the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the District that no officer or employee of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the District in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each parry's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he orshe has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. r:\CIP\Projects\PW04-13\Lim&Nascimento Agr IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. DISTRICTOF TEMECULA Chuck Washington, President Attest: Susan W. Jones, CIVIC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corp. 1887 Business Center Dr, 2nd Fir, #6 San Bernardino, CA 92408 (909) 890-0477 Peter Lim, Chief Executive Officer William Nascimento, President (Two Signatures of Corporate Officers Required For Corporations) r:\CIPtProjectstPW04-13%Lim&Nasdmento Agr EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES MARGARITA ROAD UNDER CROSSING PROJECT NO. PW04-13 r:\CIP\Projects\PW04-13\Lim&Nascimento Agr Exhibit A - Page 1 of Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 DESCRIPTIONS OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS The City of Temecula operates a Class 1 Bike Lane/Multi-purpose Trail along the Santa Gertudis Creek Channel. At present, the trail crosses the Margarita Road Bridge at grade. Therefore, the trail is discontinued by the traffic on the Margarita Road, and the users need to cross the roadway to reach the trail on the other side of the bridge, which creates safety concerns for the trail users. The purpose of this project is to construct a trail undercrossing by depressing the trail underneath the existing Margarita Road Bridge. This undercrossing grade separates the trail users and roadway traffic; thus, it provides a continuous and safety trail passage under Margarita Road. The proposed project includes approximately 550 feet long trail modifications, approximately 200 feet upstream and downstream of the existing Margarita Road Bridge. The proposed project improvements include construction of a tieback wall or soil nail wall, bike trail improvements, grading, signing and striping, erosion control, geotechnical investigations, field survey, permitting, storm water prevention, and other related work. The scope of work includes the following tasks: TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT This task includes communication and coordination with the City of Temecula (City), subconsultants and stakeholders. The objective of this task is to provide overall management of the Engineering Services. We anticipated that we will conduct/attend the following meetings: Task 1.1 Project Kick-off Meeting: LAN will conduct a Project Kick -Off meeting to kick off the project, and communicate with team members regarding the important project issues, such as project goal, project schedule, work plan, etc. The attendees of the meeting include the Project Manager from the City of Temecula, LAN Project Manager/Task Managers, and Task Leader form each subconsultant. The meeting is anticipated to be held at the City's office. Task 1.2 Concept Review Meetings: Immediate after NTP, LAN will develop the bike trail conceptual Plan and Profile, study the feasible wall type, and define the limits of the Construction Work Area for building the wall. LAN will conduct a Concept Review Meeting to present the conceptual drawings to the City for comments and approval. LAN's environmental subconsultant and geotechnical subconsultant are anticipated to attend this meeting. The meeting is anticipated to be held at the City's office. Task 1.3 Utility Meetings: The City will handle the utility coordination with its own work force, and LAN will incorporate the utility information, received from the City, into the final Contract Plans. LAN Project Manager is anticipated to attend two (2) utility meetings to provide the support to City's utility coordination effort. The meeting is anticipated to be held at the City's office. Task 1.4 Project Meetings: LAN will hold three (3) project meetings, one of each prior to 35%, 65%, and 95% PS&E submittal, to coordinate/resolve project issues between team members, Exhibit A - Page 2 of 9 Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 is and inform the City Project Manager the project status. The meeting is anticipated to be held at the City's office. Task 1.5 Environmental Meetings: LAN Project Manager and environmental subconsultant are anticipated to attend three environmental meetings, one for each permitting agency (Army Corps of Engineers, California Regional Water Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Game) to coordinate and resolve project related issues. The meetings are anticipated to be held at each agency's office. TASK 2 — SURVEYS This task is to perform field survey to provide topographical mapping necessary to complete the design plans. All surveys shall be performed in accordance with accepted professional standards. Associated Engineers, LAN team survey subconsultant, will perform the survey task for the project. Task 2 includes the following activities: Task 2.1 Control Survey and Base Data Review ■ Data Collection - obtain agency approved survey control; • Monument Recovery - recover, tie and verify existing survey control; and • Survey Control Monument Densification - provide additional local horizontal and vertical control for design and construction surveys. Task 2.2 Design Data Surveys Detailed design surveys and tie-in surveys, to tie and map existing features; tie and dip all accessible inlets and manholes. ■ Trail alignment — cross sections at 50' intervals; • Trail connector tie-ins to Margarita Road; ■ Bridge surveys — abutments, bents and soffits for clearances; • Existing utility locations — tie and map all visible surface evidence; ■ Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel cross sections for 1000 LF at 100 foot intervals; and ■ Prepare and Deliver DGN, DTM and ASCII format files. Task 2.3 Monument Preservation ■ Locate and tie all existing survey monumentation within the project limits. • Prepare and file Corner Records for monuments exposed to be disturbed by construction. Task 2.4 Survey Control Monuments Identify and describe suitable Construction Staking Survey Control. Provide the data in written format. TASK 3 — GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT The geotechnical engineer will conduct field investigations, and prepare a Geotechnical Engineering Report including necessary design features. The work includes the following activities: Subtask 3.1: Permitting/Data Review MI Exhibit A - Page 3 of 9 Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 Research and review the existing project plans and available geotechnical information; contact Underground Service Alert (USA) to check boring locations for underground utilities. Subtask 3.2: Subsurface Investigation Drill 3 borings, one approximately 20 feet deep near the existing bridge and 2 approximately 10 feet deep approximately 100 feet from the bridge. Subtask 3.3: Laboratory Testing Perform 6 moisture content/dry density, 4 particle size analysis or Atterberg limits, 3 shear strength, 1 compaction, 1 corrosion, and 1 R-value tests. Subtask 3.4: Analysis/Reporting Provide a report with conclusions and recommendations regarding: seismic hazards based on published maps; earthwork/grading; discussion on various retaining wall type, and recommendation of preferred retaining wall type; retaining wall shallow foundation bearing capacity and settlement; lateral earth pressures; corrosion potential; and asphalt concrete pavement thickness for bike paths. Three (3) copies of the preliminary report will be presented for City review. Thereafter, review comments will be incorporated and three (3) copies of the final report will be delivered to the City. The report shall bear the signature and stamp of the California Registered Civil Engineer in responsible charge. The geotechnical work specifically excludes any investigation needed to evaluate the presence or absence of hazardous or toxic materials at the site in the soil, surface water, or groundwater. However, these services will be provided upon request. TASK 4 —PERMITTING The studies required for the preparation of permit applications includes a Habitat Assessment Report, and Jurisdictional Assessment. The Habitat Assessment Report and Jurisdictional Assessment are required for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404, California Regional Water Quality Control Board 401, and for the California Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602). Subtask 4.1: Perform Habitat Assessment ■ LAN environmental subconsultant, Gonzales Environmental Consulting (GEC), will work with engineers to obtain construction work area map, and topographical contours to define the construction work area. • GEC will request data from the California Natural Diversity Data Base, a unit of the California Department of Fish and Game. The information obtained will identify the known locations of rare, threatened, and endangered species and significant natural communities in the region, and assist in identifying the potential on -site presence of such species. • GEC will conduct a literature search of environmental documents from adjacent and nearby areas. The literature search will include a review of pertinent maps, which identify I�� Exhibit A - Page 4 of 9 Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 occurrences of sensitive biological elements, scientific literature and regional biological field guides. GEC will conduct field surveys after the literature review and records checks. Field surveys shall be conducted using methodologies accepted by the scientific community. Field work will be conducted at a time when the habitat can be adequately surveyed for evidence of the presence of, or the potential to support, sensitive biological resources. GEC will prepare the Habitat Assessment Report. The report will conform to the Riverside County's outline and include the following contents: ■ A discussion of the existing plant communities and wildlife habitat found on the site; ■ Documentation of the date, time, season, and weather conditions at the time of survey, site accessibility and both on- and off -site activities, including a discussion of how these or other conditions may have affected the field survey results and field methods used in surveying the site; and ■ Documentation and mapping of the plant and animal resources on the site. Discussion of any species which is identified as a category or candidate species as well as any rare, threatened, or endangered species or significant natural communities. If habitat on the site was disturbed, determine when and by whom, if possible, by questioning the owner/project proponent. ■ A discussion of anticipated impacts resulting from the proposed alternatives, including potential indirect and off -site impacts, and cumulative impacts. This discussion shall include consideration of any development plans for the project area that have been proposed or adopted. ■ A list of all plant and animal species which were observed or detected during field surveys. A separate list of species expected to be present seasonally during the year shall also be included. ■ Maps of biological survey data, including the location of all sample points; transects, and additional areas surveyed in the vicinity of the project site. • A discussion of whether or not habitat is available on -site for all species identified on the Riverside County Conservation Summary Report Generator and whether or not a focused survey is required. ■ Assessment for any riparian/river areas —identification and mapping of these habitat types (Section 6.1.2 Western Riverside MSHCP Final). Habitat assessments for riparian/river species. Subtask 4.2: Perform Jurisdictional Assessment GEC will investigate whether or not wetlands or waters of the U.S. and/or a Streambed Alteration Agreement will be required. The assessment will be completed using the Riverside County guidelines and format, and includes the following activities: ■ Assessment of the proposed project and property, including the size, topographic characteristics, water resources, soil types, weather conditions and land uses on the property and in the vicinity. • Field analysis of project site in relation to habitat, soils and hydrology. • Mapping of the project site. ■ Assessment of the botanical resources of the project. ED Exhibit A - Page 5 of 9 Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 ■ Existing plant associations, including disturbed areas, and list of the dominate species of each vegetative association. ■ Dominant vegetation type within project area will be discussed in the report and mapped. • Soil delineations of potential jurisdictional areas will be discussed in the report and mapped. ■ Hydrology analysis in relationship to state and federal requirements. ■ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE)/Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Game (F&G) jurisdictional determinations in acreage will be completed based on their requirements and mapped. • All direct and indirect project impacts to jurisdictional areas will be identified. ■ An evaluation of the perceived cumulative biological impacts, if any, to jurisdictional areas associated with the project will be made. Subtask 4.3: Permit Applications The permits listed as subtasks below are required for the project. The applications for each permit will be completed using the required guidelines and format of each agency. Once the draft applications are complete, the draft applications will be submitted to the City of Temecula for review. The Final applications will be completed and supplied to the City of Temecula within 7 working days after receipt of the City of Temecula's comments. Subtask 4.3.1: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit (404) Nationwide 15 Subtask 4.3.2: California Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602) Subtask 4.3.3: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Qualification Certification (401) Subtask 4.3.4: Riverside County Flood Control District and Water Conservation District Permit Subtask 4.3.5: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit Checklist of Required Documents for Permit Applications The following information will be needed so that complete permit applications can be submitted to the responsible agencies. ■ Biological Assessment Report ■ Wetland Delineation Report • Hydrology Report ■ Bike Path Plan and Profile, and Construction Work Area ■ Grading Plans ■ CEQA Document (City of Temecula) ■ (Archeological Studies, if not covered in CEQA Document ) (City of Temecula) ■ (Historical Studies, if not covered in CEQA Document) (City of Temecula) • Storm Water Permit Information/SWPPP (City of Temecula) TASK 5 — HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS REPORT It includes the following activities: Subtask 5.1: Research& Review Exhibit A - Page 6 of 9 Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 We will meet with the Riverside County Flood Control District to collect and review the available existing information. Subtask 5.2: Modeling We will evaluate the proposed channel creek hydraulics, taking into account the proposed modifications, from the nearest downstream control structure to upstream of the bridge. The hydraulic model will be prepared using HEC-RAS program pursuant to FEMA policy issued in April, 2001. Subtask 5.3: Report Preparation This task consists of the preparation of a Hydrology/Hydraulics Report in accordance with City of Temecula, and County of Riverside Flood Control District Standards. A brief report will be prepared documenting data used in the analysis, assumptions made, and results obtained. Three (3) copies of the preliminary report will be presented to City and County for review. Thereafter, review comments will be incorporated and three (3) copies of the final report will be delivered to the City. The report shall bear the signature and stamp of the California Registered Civil Engineer in responsible charge. TASK 6 —PS&E PREPARATION Subtask 6.1: Alternative Analysis/Alignment This task includes reviewing the existing data and information relevant to this Project, producing conceptual plans for bike trail alignments and profile, study feasible retaining wall type, and recommend the final retaining wall type. It includes the following activities: Subtask 6.1.1: Concepts Development LAN will develop conceptual bike lane/multipurpose trail plans to include horizontal alignment, profile, and typical sections. LAN will also study two wall types, soil nail wall and tie back wall, to retain the abutment slope. Immediately after the conceptual plans are developed, LAN will meet with the City to present the conceptual plans for City's review and approval. Subtask 6.1.2: Plan & Profile (Geometrics) LAN will continue developing 30% Plan and Profile sheet, and incorporating the comments received from the conceptual plans. Subtask 6.1.3: Construction Work Area /Access Road LAN will develop Construction Work Area/Access Road required for the wall construction. This plan will define the temporary grading area required within the creek, and will be used as supporting information to apply permits. Subtask 6.1.4: Cost Estimate LAN will develop preliminary project cost estimate for the studied alternatives, based on the current unit price. Subtask 61.5: Summary Letter Report Exhibit A - Page 7 of 9 Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 LAN will prepare a letter report to summarize the alternatives studied, the pros and cons of each alternative, preliminary project cost estimate for each alternative and recommendations for the prefer alternative. Subtask 6.1 Deliverable: LAN will provide three (3) full size, three (3) half size (I Px17) plan sets 30% drawings, preliminary project cost estimate, and three (3) copies of Summary Letter Report. Subtask 6.2: 70% PS&E This task includes the preparation of the 70% PS&E package. LAN will prepare 70% plans, quantity estimates for the project based on the 70% plans, a preliminary project cost estimate based on current unit prices, and develop draft construction special provisions, using City format and reference the latest version of the standard specifications. These specifications will be based upon the Standard Specification for Public Works Construction (Green Book). It includes the following activities: Subtask 6.2.1: Title Sheet/General Notes Subtask 6.2.2: Plan and Profile Subtask 6.2.3: Sections Subtask 6.2.4: Grading & Drainage Subtask 6.2.5: Drainage Details Subtask 6.2.6: Construction Details Subtask 6.2.7: Bikeway Signing and Striping Subtask 6.2.8: Construction Work Area / Access Road Subtask 6.2.9: Temporary BMPs Subtask 6.2.10: Structural Calculations Subtask 6.2.11: Structural Layout Subtask 6.2.12: Structural Sections Subtask 6.2.13: Structure Details No. 1 Subtask 6.2.14: Structural Details No. 2 Subtask 6.2.15: Specifications Subtask 6.2.16: Estimates Subtask 6.2 Deliverable: LAN will provide three (3) full size , three (3) half size (I Vx17") plan sets 70% drawings, three (3) copies of the Specifications with one copy shown with edits, three (3) copies of Geotechnical Report, three (3) copies of Hydrology/Hydraulics Report, and preliminary project cost estimate. Subtask 6.3: 90% PS&E This task includes completion of the 90% (Draft Final) Design Packages for review by City. The work consists of the following activities: Subtask 6.3.1: Title Sheet/General Notes Subtask 6.3.2: Plan and Profile Subtask 6.3.3: Sections Subtask 6.3.4: Grading & Drainage Subtask 6.3.5: Drainage Details Subtask 6.3.6: Construction Details Exhibit A - Page 8 of 9 Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 Subtask 6.3.7: Bikeway Signing and Striping Subtask 6.3.8: Construction Work Area / Access Road Subtask 6.3.9: Temporary BMPs Subtask 6.3.10: Structural Check Calculations Subtask 6.3.11: Structural Layout Subtask 6.3.12: Structural Sections Subtask 6.3.13: Structure Details No. 1 Subtask 6.3.14: Structural Details No. 2 Subtask 6.3.15: Specifications Subtask 6.3.16: Estimates Subtask 6.3 Deliverable: LAN will provide three (3) full size , three (3) half size (IVx17") plan sets 90% drawings, three (3) copies of the Specifications with one copy shown with edits, one (1) copy of structure calculations, and preliminary project cost estimate. Subtask 6.4: 100% PS&E This task is to incorporate City's review comments of 90% PS&E package. The work consists of the following activities: Subtask 6.4.1: Revisions/Submittal Subtask 6.4.2: RE Pending File Subtask 6.4 Deliverable: LAN will provide one (1) full size, plan sets 100% drawings, one (1) unbound Specifications, one (1) project cost estimate. Subtask 6.5: Camera Ready PS&E This task includes completion of the Signature Ready PS&E for project advertisement for bidding. The task deliverable includes the following: ➢ Drawings: One full size Mylar, with wet signature plan set. ➢ Specifications: One original, unbound set. ➢ Final Project Cost Estimate: Two (2) copies. ➢ Final electronic files of drawings in AutoCad 2000 format, and Specifications in MS Word format. TASK 7 —CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT (OPTIONAL Subtask 7.1: Bid Support LAN team will assist the City during the Bidding Phase of the project by preparing Addenda, providing answers to bidder's questions, as necessary, and participating in the pre -bid meeting. Subtask 7.2: RHICCO Support LAN will support the City during the construction of the project by providing engineering support to respond contractor Request for Information (RFI), review contractor produced shop drawings submittals, and review contractor change order request. We assume to review ten (10) RFIs, and two (2) submittals to support this task. 10 Exhibit A - Page 9 of 9 Scope of Work Margarita Road Undercrossing — Project No. PW04-13 Subtask 7.3: As-Builts LAN will draft the Resident Engineer's mark-up changes or the contractor markup plans, drawings, and other data onto the electronic plan files and provide these to the City. u EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE 10 r:\CIP\Projects\PW04-13\Lim&Nascimento Agr Cl) CD O 3 IL O z H U W O g � � a W O Z is a.y P � 0 LL a U OLU f- O p U U Q O Q H Q U O O a g Ln Ln N r, to M N c+/ N O NM q W to W n 69 � o 69 a M Cl) 0 c0 co CD ( d O Cl V N M T V 61> U 40 o � E E E E U C N O W Z > C c W Q N E m J mN z 0 O P IL U w a G U) z z O U ro U) M Exhibit 13- page 2 of 7 mmm-U BEER mmmm mmm ■■■■■■■I■ SIMONi �:�.E�tit����_��GSiit3Gsc•: �it3f...::.,..®�}� ..i., Exhibit B- page 3 of 7 ��:- Exhibit B- page 5 of 7 MEN mm,mm f�f�f�Jf�f�f�©frrrrrasJEII�L S� fr�� ■MEN 0 it ■■■■■■�®■■i�ii�iii Exhibit B- page 6 of 7 CURE==== �� dui Exhibit B - page 7 of 7 City of Temecula Project: Margarita Road Under Crossing, Project No. PW04.13 Rev. 0 - November 1. 2004 Client: City of Temecula Date: 11/01/04 Element: Department of Public Works Proj: 0 Ref # Description Unit Amount Cost/Unit Total 1 Reproduction/Plotting Number of Drawings (Half Size) 14 Ea Size of Drawings (Half Size) 1.5 Sq Ft Size of Drawings Full Size 6 Sq Ft Bluelines (Full Size) 15 Sets 1260 Sq Ft 0.15 / Sq Ft $189 Xerox (Full Size) 0 Sets 0 Sq Ft 0.50 / Sq Ft $0 Sepia transparency (Full Size) 0 Sets 0 Sq Ft 0.80 / Sq Ft $0 Contact Mylars (Full Size) 1 Sets 84 Sq Ft 1.90 / Sq Ft $160 Vellums Full Size 0 Sets 0 Sq Ft 0.95 / Sq Ft 0 Subtotal (1) $349 2 Copying/Binding Reports Ea Sheets 0.08 / Sheet 0 Calculations Ea Sheets 0.08 / Sheet 0 Specifications Ea Sheets 0.08 / Sheet 0 Half Size Drawings Sets 0 Sheets 0.25 / Sheet 0 Binding (Reports) Ea 0 Tot 1.5 Ea 0 Subtotal (2) $0.00 3 Plotting Plotting (Half Size) Sets 0 Sheets 5.75 / Sheet 0 Plotting Full Size 0 Sets 14 Sheets 6.50 / Sheet 0 Subtotal (3) $0.00 4 Transportation/Travel Flight 0 Persons 0 Trips EA 0 EA / Round Trip 0 Rental Car 0 Day(s) EA Trip 0 Trips Total 0 EA Day 0 Hotel/Per Diem 0 Days 0 0 EA Day 0 Personal Car (Mileage) 0 Miles Round Trip 11 Trip 0.3754 $ / mile 0 Subtotal (4) $0.00 5 Special Deliveries Express Mail 5 Deliveries 1 Ea 25 $ / EA 125 S ecial Delive 0 Ea 0 Ea 55 0 Subtotal (5) $125.00 6 Computer Costs Engineering Design 0 Hr 8 0 CAD 0 Hr 24 0 Subtotal (6) $0.00 7 Subconsultants Geotechnical LS Subtotal (Subs) $0 Total (1 through 6) $473.60 SCHEDULE OF RATES LIM & NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF RATES 2004 DESIGN: 1 Principal / Quality Assurance 185.00 / Hr 2 Project Manager (PM) 135.00 / Hr 3 Structure Engineer (SE) 110.00 / Hr 4 Senior Project Engineer / Senior Civil Engineer (SPE) 135.00 / Hr 5 Project Engineer (PE) 120.00 / Hr 6 Associate Engineer (AE) 80.00 / Hr 7 Assistant Engineer (Assi E) 70.00 / Hr 8 Design Technician 95.00 / Hr 9 CAD 80.00 / Hr 10 Administrator (Clr) 50.00 / Hr Court Appearance — Add $50 / Hr Reimbursable (other direct costs) billed at cost plus 10%. *Hourly rates are effective through the first 12 months of this contract. After the first 12 months of the contract, the above rates will increase by a maximum of 5 percent for each subsequent 12- month period. F kyyy Cl 3: 1 0- 07 2 L Z8 il 15 11:14 4'1 it !I 11111TI fill I I 8 a I I- 1- 1$2 1� IV 1$2 1;! I!P I!R 1�: IV IV I R l& Is' In IZ& In lie Ir In IA IR 1� I p ldd8 z :5 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIN, CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors Shawn D. Nelson, General Manager FROM: Susan W. Jones City Clerk/Director of Support Services DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Ratification of Election Results — Tract No. 26828-1, -2, and Final PREPARED BY: Cheryl Domenoe, Administrative SecretarycA RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL -IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2004 DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW BACKGROUND: At the meeting of September 14, 2004, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. CSD 04-11, which called for a Special Election to be held among the property owners of the parcels within Tract No. 26828-1, -2, and Final (Loma Linda Tract). The purpose of this election was to establish Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service Level D, rates and charges for street lighting, perimeter slope landscaping maintenance, and refuse/cycling collection services per residential parcel beginning FY 2005-06 This election was conducted by mail with a final date for acceptance of ballots to be no later than 1:30 p.m. on November 3, 2004. At 2:00 p.m. on that date, the City Clerk acting in her capacity as the City's Election Official and as the Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District declared the receipt period for receiving ballots closed. At 2:00 p.m., the Elections Canvassing Board duly appointed and consisting of City Clerk Susan Jones, Administrative Assistant Cheryl Domenoe, and Senior Records Coordinator Gwyn Flores, conducted the canvass of the results. The results of the votes cast, returned within the time allowed and publicly counted, are included within the body of the proposed resolution. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution ratifying the results of this election. Agenda Reports\Election CSD Tract 26828 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact as a consequence of the ratification of the election results. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. CSD 04- Official Tally of the Votes Vicinity Map Agenda Reports\Election CSD Tract 26828 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL -IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON OCTOBER 20, 2004 DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, a Special Mail -in Ballot Election was held and conducted in the City of Temecula, California, on November 3, 2004, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that the special election was for the purpose of obtaining approval by property owners within Tract No. 26828-1, -2, and Final, for establishment of the annual levy of TCSD Rates and Charges for each affected parcel as follows: Service Level B $25.68 for Residential Street Lighting and Service Level C $70.00 Rates and Charges for Perimeter and Slope Landscape Maintenance, per residential parcel beginning FY 2005-06; Service Level D ($180.70 is FY 2004 - 05 rate, the 2005-06 rate will change based on a contractual agreement with CR&R) for Refuse/Cycling Collection Services was properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. CSD 04-11, adopted September 14, 2004, the ballots were returned to the office of the City Clerk/Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District; the results were received, canvassed in public and are herein set forth in Section 2. NOW THEREFORE, THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the whole number of ballots cast in the homeowners election was one (1) and the whole number of provisional ballots cast in the election was none (0). Section 2. That the whole number of ballots cast for establishment of the annual levy for Service Level B rates and charges for Residential Street Lighting per residential parcel beginning FY 2005-06, Service Level C for Perimeter and Slope Landscape Maintenance per residential parcel beginning FY 2005-06, and Service Level D for Refuse/Cycling Collection Services per occupied parcel beginning FY 2005-06 on the ballot were as follows: Yes No Incomplete 1 0 0 Section 3. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District does declare and determine that as a result of the election, a majority of the voters voting on the measure relating to the establishment of Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service Level D Rates and Charges beginning Fiscal Year 2003-04 pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 6 of the California Constitution, did vote in favor of the measure and that the measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted and ratified. R:CSD Resos 2004\CSD 04- Section 4. The City Clerk/Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) shall enter in the minutes of the TCSD Board of Directors, a statement of the result of the election, showing: (1) The whole number of ballots cast in the City; (2) The votes in favor, (3) The votes in opposition and (4) Those received incomplete. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 23rtl day of November, 2004. Chuck Washington, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk/District Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 04- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District on the 23rtl day of November, 2004, by the following roll call vote. AYES: DISTRICT MEMBERS: NOES: DISTRICT MEMBERS: ABSENT: DISTRICT MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: DISTRICT MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary R:CSD Resos 2004\CSD 04- CANVAS FOR BALLOT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES FOR PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR REFUSE/CYCLING COLLECTION TRACT 26828-1, -2, AND FINAL YES NO TOTAL O Susan Cheryl Domldnoe, Administrative Assistant Elections Officer S o Ni �F%GQ7xQ/ Gwyn F res, Sfenior Records Coordinator Elections Officer Forms/Ballot Canvass MURRIETA HOT 459p1 GIB w CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY �SERAPHINA ROAD PROJECT SITE GENEPpAp,L RITA WAY . p JOSEPH ROAD N NICpLpSROADFINBROOK CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY NORTH TRACT N0. 26828-1, 26828-2 AND 26828 VICINITY MAP ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Servi es DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Landscape Easement Deeds from Property Owners within Tract 19872 Adjacent to Pechanga Parkway PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst W RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Accept two (2) Landscape Easement Deeds from property owners within Tract 19872 adjacent to Pechanga Parkway. 2. Authorize the City Clerk to record the Landscape Easement Deeds. BACKGROUND: On June 24, 2003 the City Council approved a resolution that ratified a property owner election to bring Tract Map Nos. 19872-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 and Final into a Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) landscape maintenance district. The new landscape maintenance area will include an expanded parkway along Pechanga Parkway and within the westerly right -of way of Via Gilberto. Subsequently, landscape plans have been designed and approved and on August 10, 2004 City Council accepted and approved a contract for America West Landscape, Inc. to install the landscaping. The area between the sound wall and Pechanga Parkway's right-of-way from Loma Linda to Via Gilberto requires a landscape easement from each property owner in order for TCSD to install and maintain the landscaping. On August 24, 2004 the Board approved 24 landscape maintenance easements of the required 28 landscape easements needed for this project. We were successful in obtain two (2) additional easements and it is our intention to continue trying to obtain the remaining two (2) easements from the property owners that have been either unwilling or unable to provide TCSD with a notarized landscape easement. Should TCSD be unable to obtain the rest of the easements the landscape plans will be altered to exclude areas outside of Pechanga Parkway's right-of-way and the property owners will continue to have maintenance responsibilities. RlsmithbNechanga Parkway EasementslStaff Report -Acceptance Easement 2.doc 11/052004 The annual assessment to fund the maintenance of this new landscape district (Service Level C) is twenty dollars ($20.00). However, for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 we anticipate that the improvements will be completed by January 2005 and for this initial year in the district, the property owners will only be assessed at a rate of $10.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The installation of the landscaping at a cost of $219,554.50 will be funded from AD 159 and CFD 03-3 Wolf Creek. The on -going maintenance of the landscaping will be funded from Service Level C assessment revenue collected from the property owners of Tract Map Nos. 19872-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 and Final on their property taxes. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Copy of Easement Deeds R:\smithb\Pechan5a Parkway Easements\StaffRepon-Acceptance Easement 2.doc ❑/05/2004 m a Recording requested by and when Recorded, mail to: City Clerk City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Exempt from Recording Fee per Govt. Code Sec. 27383 City of Temecula (Space above this line for Recorder's use) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS NONE. Public Agency exempt. Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Lesa K. DeLauder, an unmarried women, as her sole and separate property ("Grantor") hereby grants and conveys to the Temecula Community Services District ("Grantee") a public corporation, a perpetual easement and right- of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing irrigation equipment and plant material over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter described as follows in Exhibit "A " which is attached. If GRANTEE, or its, successors, or assigns, determine it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of the GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assignees of the GRANTOR. All as illustrated on the plat attached hereto and mwked Exhibit "B" IN WITNESS WHERE OF; this instrument has been executed this �, day of , 2004. i , / • &Ia I �' ��.t� l/�.I % / I -F - ----- EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LANDSCAPE EASEMENT THE NORTHEASTERLY 11.00 FEET OF LOT 45, OF TRACT 19872-2, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 154, PAGES 13 THROUGH 18, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BOUND BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 11.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 45, SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PALA ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. THIS DESCRIPTION ALSO BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" AND THEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: &kou" 0* L LA ROBERT C. OLLERTON DATE Oyo�a C. O� PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 7731 EXPIRES: 12-31-2005 g PLS 7737 MEMO C:\0201900.01\legal descriptions\TR 19872-2 LOT 45.doc L J r % CUPENO RAINBOW CYN. RU �Cq /���J J CLUBHOUSE DR.NWSMRSDR J7 aMURnELD LOM4 LINDA RO43 VIA CONSUMASK._ COM017LO CT. O 1 VIA GILBER �r �, 1 N WJN17Y A NOT TO SCALE NpRTNEAST pZY45 LOT 45 LOT 46 LOT o r�y- ys 47 O 1 ~ p LOT O Af 8 1 n 1 55 SCALE.- > =50' 11 1E�'ENQ PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERWSION OF ® LANDSCAPE EASEMENT W-C, a" s-IR-o4 ROBERT C. OUERTON P.L.S NO. 77J1 DALE EXPIRES.• J J1-05 RELm DRAWER OWNER' L L � (�� OAFIG�GIiUlaf! K. �5�°Np C. LESA '. po CaYKMy59rAWA67AWr M10A10 9Y * ' °" * EXH/B/T "B" COZ40 & FOX, INC. 12-310 5 DRAWN Br 151 S. OIR4RD ST. Jj y0 i� 3� tiP R.O. HEMET, CA 925M (909) 652-4454 oA cALi4 L14 004-2004 SHEET 1 OF ! CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Califor 'a ss. County of /(�if On before me,t�zs� Date _ Name and The of Officer (e g `Jane Dce, Notary Public") personally appeared CHRISTINE T. LEACH Commission 91294745 t w Notary Public - CaRforl L Riverside County ''�' MyComm.6pi1esFeb2D,2MSr personally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persor* whose name) is/)ee subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that)4she/ty executed the same in Y"er/t$ir authorized capacity((s), and that by *her/X'eir signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WI N S hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above l Signature of Notary Pubtho­ OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Title or Type of Document: _ Document Date: J a� -OY Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Clajmed y Siyner �/ ^e LL-42 Signer's Name: 33 /l Individual Top of thumb here ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner El Limited El General Eli Attorney n Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: �^ Signer Is Representing: N 0 1999 National Notary Assrcvelion • 931i0 De Bob Ave.. P.O. Box 2442 • Clatswof, CA 91313-2402 • vnee,eatmalralaryorp Peel. W. 5907 Reontl . Call ToIFFree 1E00-87B 7 Recording requested by and when Recorded, mail to: City Clerk City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Exempt from Recording Fee per Govt. Code Sec. 27383 City of Temecula DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS NONE. Public Agency exempt. Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, William J. Kolt and Joann K. Kolt, husband and wife as joint tenants ("Grantors") hereby grants and conveys to the Temecula Community Services District ("Grantee") a public corporation, a perpetual easement and right- of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing irrigation equipment and plant material over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter described as follows in Exhibit "A " which is attached. If GRANTEE, or its, successors, or assigns, determine it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of the GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assignees of the GRANTOR. All as illustrated on the plat attached hereto and marked Exhibit "B" IN WITNESS instrument has been execut this / 7 day of //sT 12004. Signature: Williaih olt Signature: 1/ Jo K. Kolt WHERE OF; this EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LANDSCAPE EASEMENT THE NORTHEASTERLY 11.00 FEET OF LOT 44, OF TRACT 19872-2, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 154, PAGES 13 THROUGH 18, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BOUND BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 11.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 44, SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PALA ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. THIS DESCRIPTION ALSO BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" AND THEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: ROBERT C. OLLERTON DATE y�oN oNos PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 7731 0``�0���� EXPIRES: 12-31-2005 g m Pis 7731 PIR �/ES` C:\0201900.01\legal descriptions\TR 19872-2 LOT 44.doc <LD(, 15 79(S) pEG� 40 a S CUFENO LN. RAINBOW CM. RD. CLUBHOUSE DR.� cr cf r L D-f MASTERS DR. MURRELD DR. 1 LORA LINDA ROAD q M CONSUELO MASKUAZ CT. COMOTILO CT. LOT VW GIIBER70 42 VIC/N/TY AL4P J NOT TO SCALE LJT 43 LOT oavfoFvp1Y44 44 O a � a `J-ell�y� OA J y� 55, 1 O O LJT n 46 SCALE.' 1=50' y 1 �>2 PREP�A�RED UNDER 7HE SUPERNS/ON OF ® LANDSCAPE EASEMENT &�.ua1 6. a s-/8.04 ROSERT C. 0LL£RT01V P.L.S. NO. 7731 DATE EXPIRES.• 3 31-05 RELIDRO OWNER kpL LANp M7 OF TE�'MM {4 ✓. KOL T & ANN ✓OAMV K. KCX T 4�sS10 sG e� C. Off^ pL� � � A a REOIS7RATION e , e camKwy SDNW a571BC'T EXH/B/T '°B" 89044m Br Gb7A0 & FOX, /NC. izai-0s DRAW BY 151 S MUD Sr HEWT, CA 91544 mT Ab ��� o R.O. (909f 651-4454 Op c SHEET 1 OF 1 RLE.19872-2 LOT 44.DNC dN. 02019M01 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ss. 71 i(/2.(',.Si.Oe '/ /voift�, On /7 D 7 before me, ��/ti 5rl Data Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary PublicZr personally CHRISTINE T. LEACH tom" Commission # 1294745 33 Notary Public - California q Riverside County MY „rxr.^t. (R,b20, 2005 Nandi of Signer(s) ❑ personally known to me -4 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s))K/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that*e/O(e/they executed the same in M/Wr/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by tW/iker/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WI NES m and and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Publi OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Title or Type of Document: Document Date: ? 17 0 3 Number of Pages: _ 13 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Signer's Namg: Individuals ❑ Corporate O ❑ Partner — ❑ Attorney in F ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or ❑ Other: � CI imed by Signer /0i//iA LT F UD4VAI iC��o47 Top of thumb here fficer — Title(s): ❑ Limited ❑ General act Conservator Signer Is Representing: 0 1M NaS l Notary Association • 9350 N Soto Aw., P.O. Box 2CO2 • Cba ewoM, CA 9131&24 • www.natonalrotaryo,9 PeA. No. 5907 Reorder Call Toll -Free 1�87a832> ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER i � TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services November 23, 2004 Wolf Creek Specific Plan - Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D Rates and Charges Barbara Smith, Management Analyst v� Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2004 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT MAP NOS. 29798 SERIES AND 30264 SERIES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope landscaping maintenance and refuse/recycling collection services to numerous residential subdivisions within the City of Temecula through Service Level "B", Service Level "C" and Service Level "D" respectively. The boundaries of the TCSD are coterminous with the City, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. Wolf Creek Specific Plan has been approved with open space, a commercial area, fire station elementary school, a 6 acre public park, a linear park along Wolf Creek Drive, a 43 acre public sports park and approximately 1811 residential units. The above rates and charges will only be levied on single-family residential parcels. The development currently consists of approximately 569 gross acres of vacant property located to the north of Pechanga Parkway (Pala Road), east of Loma Linda Road, and west of Deer Hollow Way. The property owners have requested that the TCSD establish the future parcel charges necessary to provide ongoing revenue for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and refuse/recycling collection services within this development. Rismithb\Elections\Wolf Creek\Staff-Notice of Hearing.doc 11/152004 Beginning Fiscal Year 2005-2006, the following TCSD rates and charges are proposed for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and refuse/recycling collection services within Wolf Creek Specific Plan: Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D (2004-2005 Rate) $ 25.68 per residential parcel $ 129.00 per residential parcel $179.86 per occupied parcel Pursuant to the provisions of Proposition 218, the TCSD is required to hold a public hearing and obtain voter or property owner approval in order to establish certain new rates and charges. In addition, a report must be prepared and filed with the Secretary/City Clerk which identifies all of the affected parcels and the amount of the proposed rates and charges. A notice is mailed to the property owner identifying the proposed rates and charges and date of the Public Hearing. The Public Hearing is held at least 45 days after the mailing of the notices. If the proposed rates and charges are not rejected pursuant to a written protest, then the TCSD will conduct a mailed ballot proceeding not less than 45 days after the public hearing. The proposed rates and charges for Service Level B and Service Level C cannot be imposed unless the property owners approve the new charges. In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners shall receive notice of the proposed charges for Service Level D, however, mailed ballot proceedings are not required to impose rates and charges for refuse/recycling collection services. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report on the proposed residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and refuse/recycling collection services rates and charges for Wolf Creek Specific Plan beginning in Fiscal Year 2005-2006 and schedule a public hearing concerning this issue for January 25, 2005. Staff will then proceed with noticing the owners of Wolf Creek Specific Plan regarding the proposed rates and charges and the public hearing date. If there is no majority protest against the rates and charges on January 25, 2005 staff will then proceed with the mailed ballot process for Service Level B and Service Level C. FISCAL IMPACT: If voter approved, upon build out of the development, the proposed rates and charges of $25.68 and $129.00 per parcel will generate an annual levy of $46,506, forthe Service Level B and $233,619 for Service Level C. The proposed Service Level D charge of $179.86 per parcel will generate an annual levy of $325,726. (Pursuant to Proposition 218, this amount may be increased by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 after conducting an additional public hearing. However, mailed ballot proceedings are not required to increase Service Level D rates and charges.) Actual costs for providing long-term residential street lighting and perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance services within Wolf Creek Specific Plan will be absorbed into Service Level B and Service Level C upon installation of said improvements. The owners of Wolf Creek Specific Plan has paid the administrative and mailing costs associated with the public notices and ballot information required per Proposition 218. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. TCSD Landscape Maintenance Area 3. Notice of Public Hearing 4. Resolution of Intention R:\smithbTlections\Wolf Creek\Staff-Notice of Hearing.doe 11/152004 Wolf Creek - VICINITY MAPA 0 pP� .�. Redh ® C 'den tial m PROJECT SITE Pechanga Resort and Casino Pechanga Legend eserytion Highways — �/ Centerline ®— O city I Pechanga Reservation 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet This map was made by the City of Te la Gepgaphic IMormabm system. The map Is denied born bass data Produced by the M.itle County Ass.Ws Depemnenl aMi Tmmpadabon and Manapemerrt Ag of RNersNle County. The Cky of Temecula msurtres no wen Is p.eDalresponslbllkyfW lnfamallan contained m Mubjed t Data aM lnfm Mbn mpmeenletl ograph cmp are aft onto update eM pwtliflmtbn. The Geographic Infwmatlon System aM abler soumm ahaultl be yuedetl f l Uso wresalB.I.. most nent n(amatlon. Thla map l8 na for repent or Map pmpaed OGobsr 13. 20 r�gis1ke1l1 iewyroJeci woffcreek_Nelnity_aff • Ot' !! � �lul Olt_ Ckrar flaw w ♦ .+. 111111111111■ I 1151111111 �a�1•IIIu U/// 11 Eallnnnuun. E= M. in =!?JII �/h �I�i �Ilul►/ M IIII/ •• 1j1 ■■ i►t'� •� 1•••IAO � Epp � I �Q�O�a1�l1�D �� � ��'1 � 111I1111111 ��• :pgputr�\_ •�� ..i nl Gin920 one ► .■ lr ■�► /nun �p R. ■WERMTS noon �. � I ..♦ ♦ �►' nnnnn� a :I �9■11: ••���uur■uI■ 11►p11 11111►\ p p1►P � i o�Wal 111 1111111 INV ►11,41111 • tl annnn IIDQI � a1�1� Ill/l�►ld still am MM II I I I1' I I I I I O►DF �lQ �11111"�111I1 11111' lrlll , �pl■ c� ■■ � � 1111OIIILa1111 i Q ■.r r■ s�1 11 i �� �l dt11IY►►1. all - I � DQitO��� •Or�O 7 p10� p� III , ■ i101. ����0�1••iiiln '•,♦ • �■OIL i III NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT MAP NOS. 29798 SERIES AND 30264 SERIES BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 Pursuant to the request of the property owners of 1,811 future residential lots within Tract Map Nos. 29798 Series and 30264, the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) has initiated proceedings to assume responsibility for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and refuse/recycling collection services within Tract Map Nos. 29798 Series and 30264 Series beginning with the 2005-2006 fiscal year. In response to this request, and in accordance with Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD has caused a written report ('Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which contains a description of the parcels within Tract Map Nos. 29798 Series and 30264 Series and the proposed amounts of the annual rates and charges for each parcel beginning in Fiscal Year 2005-2006. The TCSD Board of Directors will conduct a public hearing at the following date, time and location on the Report and the proposed imposition of rates and charges within Tract Map Nos. 29798 Series and 30264 Series: Date: January 25, 2005 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: City Council Chambers City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 At the public hearing, the City Council and TCSD Board of Directors will hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the Report and to the proposed rates and charges. Any property owner may file with the City Clerk a written protest against the rates and charges at any time prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. The TCSD operates under the authority of the Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, street and road maintenance, and trash/recycling collection services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are the same as those of the City of Temecula, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. S:\Clients\Temecula\Wolf Creek\Notice and Ballot\Notice of Public Hearing Nov 2004.doc 11/15/200411,4h2R084 Property owners only pay for the services that they actually receive through separate rates and charges on their property tax bill. The services proposed to be provided to Tract Map Nos. 29798 Series and 30264 Series by the TCSD are divided into three (3) service levels: 1. Service LPvPI R - Residential Street Lights_ The revenues from this Service Level are used to finance the operation, maintenance, utility costs and administration of residential streetlights. The annual charge is calculated by dividing the total estimated cost for the fiscal year by the total number of improved residential lots with residential streetlights. For fiscal year 2005-2006, this amount is proposed to be no more than $25.68 per residential parcel. 2. Service Lev I C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slone Maintenance. The revenues from this Service Level are used to finance the operation, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration of all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. The annual charge is calculated by dividing the total estimated cost for the fiscal year for landscaping and slope maintenance by the total number of proposed residential lots. For fiscal year 2005-2006, this amount is proposed to be $129.00 per residential parcel. 3. Service I PVPI D - Refuse/recycling Collection_ The revenues from this Service Level are used to finance the operation and administration of the trash/recycling collection program, including recycling and street sweeping services, for all single-family residential homes. The annual charge is calculated by dividing the total estimated cost of residential service for the fiscal year by the total number of improved residential lots. For fiscal year 2005-2006 this rate has not been determined, however the fiscal year 2004-2005 rate is $179.86 per occupied residential parcel. If you have any questions about this notice or the proposed rates and charges, please do not hesitate to contact the TCSD at (951) 694-6480. -2- 990211 11086-00007 rdw 1102106 0 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT MAP NOS. 29798 SERIES and 30264 SERIES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ('TCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. The TCSD provides long-term residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope landscape maintenance, and refuse/recycling collection services in numerous residential developments within the City of Temecula. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting (Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level C), and refuse/recycling collection (Service Level D) services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. Section 3. The TCSD hereby initiates proceedings to provide residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and refuse/recycling collection services within Tract Map Nos. 29798 Series and 30264 Series beginning Fiscal Year 2005-2006. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD has caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, (Exhibit A) which Report contains a description of the real property and the proposed amount of the Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service Level D rates and charges required for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and refuse/recycling collection services provided to each parcel within Tract Map Nos. 29798 Series and 30264 Series and its subsequent phases beginning fiscal year 2005-2006. The TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, shall be applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charges are levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrance for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 4. The Board of Directors hereby acknowledges the filing of the Report, and appoints the day of January 25, 2004 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590, as the time and place for the public hearing on the Report and the proposed Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service Level D rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors will hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the Report. The Board may continue the hearing from time to time. Section 5. The Secretary of the TCSD is hereby directed to give notice of the filing of the Report and of the time and place of hearing on the Report pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 61765.2 and Section 6 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution. Section 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 23'" day of November, 2004. Chuck Washington, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/District Secretary for the Temecula Community Services District, do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 04- was duly and regularly adopted by the board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on 23t' of November, 2004. AYES: BOARD MEMBERS NOES: BOARD MEMBERS ► e�-00 ►l ►lam W EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA (WOLF CREEK) (Tract 29798 Series and Tract 30264 Series) INITIAL LEVY REPORT Service Levels B, C and D Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Commencing Fiscal Year 2005/2006 INTENT MEETING: November 23, 2004 PUBLIC HEARING: January 25, 2005 NOW MuniFinandal Corporate Office 27368 Via Industria Suite 110 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (951) 587-3500 Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) Fax:(951) 587-3510 Office Locations Anaheim, CA Oakland, CA Jacksonville, FL Phoenix, AZ Lancaster, CA Sacramento, CA Los Angeles Regional Office San Diego, CA Seattle, WA www.muni.com TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1 II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS......................................................................3 A. General Description of TCSD Services.............................................................3 B. Services and Charges........................................................................................3 III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT..................................................................6 IV. TCSD LEVY SUMMARY AND PROPOSED CHARGES.................................8 APPENDIX A — DIAGRAMS....................................................................................11 APPENDIX B — PARCEL LISTING (FY 2005-2006)..................................................23 WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT I. INTRODUCTION Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the TCSD is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the TCSD. The TCSD collects property -related fees and charges (Charges) in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the TCSD. The TCSD was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code ("CSD Law"). Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Initial Levy Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D Rates and Charges for the parcels and territory identified as Wolf Creek (a residential development) and its subsequent phases beginning Fiscal Year 2005-2006. The area is composed of the Riverside County Assessor Parcels and Tract Numbers defined in the parcel listing of Appendix B. The former Tract Numbers for the area, 29305-1 and 29305-F, are in the process of being reconfigured into the new tracts as partially described in Appendix B - Parcel Listing (FY 2005/2006). The territory and properties identified and described in this Report includes all parcels within the Wolf Creek development a future residential subdivision, identified as the Riverside County Assessor Parcels and Tract Numbers in Appendix B - Parcel Listing. The development consists of approximately five -hundred (500) acres of vacant property located near the southern border of the City, north of Pechanga Parkway (Pala Road), east of Loma Linda Road, generally south of Via Del Coronado and west of Deer Hollow Way, and is bisected by Wolf Valley Road, with 1,811 planned residential units. The owners of record (four property owners) have requested that the TCSD establish the parcel charges and conduct a ballot proceeding as necessary to provide ongoing revenue for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and refuse collection within this future residential subdivision. Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report for the TCSD is prepared, filed and approved by the Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the TCSD, any changes to the TCSD and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005/2006, it is proposed that the Wolf Creek subdivision will be added to Service Levels B, C and D and levied for the corresponding rates and charges on the Riverside County Secured Roll. 1 WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT The TCSD provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the TCSD. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting (Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level C), refuse collection (Service Level D), and road improvement and maintenance (Service Level R) services furnished by the TCSD, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. Pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218) and CSD Law, the TCSD is required to hold a protest hearing (the "Public Hearing") and a ballot proceeding in order to establish certain new rates and charges. In addition, a report must be prepared and filed with the District Secretary/City Clerk that identifies all of the affected parcels and the amount of the proposed rates and charges. A notice is mailed to the property owner identifying the proposed rates and charges and the date of the Public Hearing. The Public Hearing is held at least 45 days after the mailing of the notices. If the proposed rates and charges are not rejected pursuant to a written protest, then the TCSD will conduct a mailed ballot proceeding not less than 45 days after the Public Hearing. The proposed rates and charges for Service Level B and Service Level C cannot be imposed if majority protest of the new charges are submitted by the property owners of record. Ballot proceedings are not required to impose rates and charges for refuse collection services. 4 WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS A. General Description of TCSD Services The TCSD provides certain property related services consisting of four (4) separate Service Levels to parcels throughout the TCSD. Each parcel within the TCSD is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is provided. The Service Levels are identified as follows: • Residential Street Lighting • Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance • Refuse Collection • Road Improvement and Maintenance (Not applicable to these Tracts) B. Services and Charges The proposed services applicable to parcels defined within Appendix B — Parcel Listing for which charges will be imposed beginning Fiscal Year 2005-2006 include: street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; and refuse collection. Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting — includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the TCSD provides on -going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the tracts and subdivision of Wolf Creek that local street lighting improvements are provided to, beginning in Fiscal Year 2005-2006. Kl WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance — includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the TCSD provides on -going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with each development. The landscaped areas associated with this specific development include, but are not limited to, parkway, perimeter and slope landscaping, and include but are not limited to the following: • 13,729 total square feet along the east side of Loma Linda Road between Redwood Road and Pechanga Parkway, and along the south side of Redwood Road from Loma Linda Road to Mahogany Parkway; • 4,091 square feet along the north side of Redwood Road from close to Loma Linda Road to Mahogany Parkway; • The north side of Pechanga Parkway, including 5,367 square feet from Loma Linda Road to Mahogany Parkway and 18,108 square feet from Mahogany Parkway to Wolf Valley Road; • 502 square feet on the west side of Mahogany Parkway near its intersection with Pechanga Parkway; • 59,849 square feet on the south side of Mahogany Parkway from Pechanga Parkway until close to the eastern edge of the development; • Along both west and east sides of Wolf Valley Road beginning from the north side of the development and continuing to Pechanga Parkway; including areas on the west side of 10,251 square feet, 7,649 square feet, and 561 square feet; and areas on the east side of 10,119 square feet, 7,473 square feet, 7,869 square feet and 595 square feet; • Along the south and west sides of Wolf Creek Drive South including areas of 19,328 square feet, 18,200 square feet, 22, 997 square feet and 554 square feet; • The north side of Pechanga Parkway, including 21,371 square feet from Wolf Valley Road until close to Wolf Creek Drive South and 6,616 square feet to the east of Wolf Creek Drive South; • 1,284 square feet along the west side of Deer Hollow Way. The level of maintenance required and the associated operating costs are consistent with the existing TCSD Service Level C-7. The rate and charges for Service Level 0 WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT C-7 are currently $129.00 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within Wolf Creek beginning in Fiscal Year 2005-2006. Service Level D, Refuse Collection — provides for the operation and administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the TCSD. The current rate and charges for Service Level D is $179.86 per single family residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be applied to all parcels within Wolf Creek that have been identified as developed with residential homes, beginning in Fiscal Year 2005-2006. Pursuant to Proposition 218, the rate and charges for this service may be increased by the TCSD after conducting an additional protest hearing on the matter. Mailed ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level D rates and charges. 5 WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The cost to provide services within parcels within Wolf Creek will be fairly distributed among each assessable property by the same method and formulas applied to all parcels within the various Service Levels of the TCSD. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's TCSD charges and is applied to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance); and Service Level D (Refuse Collection): Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The following tables (Table I through III) reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level. TABLE I Parcel Charge Calculation for Service Level B Property Type Parcel Unit X Charge per Parcel = Parcel Charge Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel Single Family Vacant 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel A charge is imposed on all residential parcels developed or undeveloped. Parks, open space areas, easements and non -buildable parcels are not assessed. WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TABLE II Parcel Charge Calculation for Service Level C Property Type Parcel Unit X Charge per Parcel = Parcel Charge I Multiplier Single Family Residential Rate C-7 1.00 1 $129.00 1 $129.00 1 Per Parcel A charge is imposed on all residential parcels developed or undeveloped. Parks, open space areas, easements and non -buildable parcels are not assessed. TABLE III Parcel Charge Calculation for Service Level D Property Type Parcel Unit X Charge per Parcel = Parcel Charge I Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 $179.86 $179.86 Per Parcel This charge is imposed only on developed single family residential parcels (with a residential home). Pursuant to Proposition 218, this amount may be increased by the TCSD after conducting an additional protest hearing. WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT IV. TCSD LEVY SUMMARY AND PROPOSED CHARGES Each Service Level within the TCSD provides different and specific services to various parcels within the TCSD. The rates and charges prescribed for each service and level of service are proportionately spread to only those parcels that are provided each respective service (Service Levels). Table IV on the following page provides general levy information for the various Service Levels within the entire TCSD for Fiscal Year 2004-2005. Et? WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TABLE IV TCSD Budget and Service Level Summary For Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Fiscal Year 2004/2005 Net Charge Change Total Total Total Levy Per Levy Per Levy Levy Parcels Service Levels District Statistics Budget Unit Unit Units Charged Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) $481,680 $25.68 0.00% 18,757.00 18,757 Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes) Rate Level #1 (C-1) $47,886 $46.00 0.00% 1,041.00 1,041 Rate Level #2(C-2) 94,340 89.00 0.00% 1,060.00 1,060 Rate Level #3 (C-3) 195,924 116.00 0.00% 1,689.00 1,689 Rate Level #4 (C-4) 405,300 175.00 0.00% 2,316.00 2,316 Rate Level #5(C-5) 94,010 70.00 0.00% 1,343.00 1,343 Rate Level #6 (C-6) 54,675 225.00 0.00% 243 243 Rate Level #7 (C-7) 228,201 129.00 0.00% 1,769.00 1,769 Rate Level #8 (C-8) 4,200 10.00 100.00% 420 420 Rate Level #9 (C-9) 44,000 200.00 100.00% 220 220 Rate Level #10 (C-10) 30,000 100.00 100.00% 300 300 Service Level C - Total $1,198,536 10,401.00 Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse) $3,587,128 $179.86 4.24% 19,944.00 19,944 Service Level R (Roads) Rate Level #1 (R-1) $7,146 $115.26 0.00% 62 75 Rate Level #2 (R-2) 2,014 95.86 -21.37% 21 34 Service Level R - Total $9,160 109 WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Table V provides estimated annual levy information for the various TCSD Service Levels proposed for the Wolf Creek development beginning in Fiscal Year 2005-2006. The "Planned Levy Budget" and "Planned Levy Units" reflect anticipated development at buildout. TABLE V PROPOSED SERVICE LEVEL CHARGES FOR WOLF CREEK Estimated Budget and Charges for Fiscal Year 2005-06 SERVICE LEVEL Total Levy Charge Per Levy planned Budget Unit Levy Units Service Level B: Residential Street $46,506 $25.68 1,811 Lighting Service Level C: Local Landscaping and Slopes $233,619 $129.00 1,811 Rate Level # 1 (C- Service Level D: Refuse Collection $325,726 $179.86 1,811 The "Planned Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Tables IV and V), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly apportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D are based on a per parcel count and includes all planned residential units and an estimate of future residential units to be developed within Wolf Creek. 10 WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Appendix A — DIAGRAMS The TCSD Parkway Maintenance Exhibit - Wolf Creek Site Plan, the Wolf Creek Maintenance Plan, the and the current County Assessor's Parcel Number maps (APN maps) encompassing Wolf Creek, are provided on the following pages. The original maps and documents depicted in this Report are by reference made part of this Report. 11 z E■! coo � 0-4 4 \)§, 2 )|§§ | § ft)! � k § ) §!§ a ! } O rig.•♦ 0�W� sir/Ilri �0 ooa III IIp 1��~,I � ;� /tnitlt11111: I � c �'11 11111 n1�� 11 Gj111t1111111111. +Ig11p Mason nnu_ __ ■cun in /111 00n1101 �q _ nI11t mill►\ I/IIp it�i i it1111H C� 11 �1 i i ` ��/QIG�IIIIIII on /•I/�iii ipii\� � � �IIIIIGr71111111 � ��11 ♦ i UI11111111 OWNS !y 11 �OtgOpt \ ►fit_ \�Utn �: �iuo► ► ► .. Ginnnr u /nun 7• ■noun .. FM ■unnnt .. •' �� ■ u1nuU i►�C no small MINE C C,*. I1//14y1IP • / ""Iloilo IIII A. ■■ �I/IIIIIIInI 11n1.- 1 � �IIIIIII� � ' 7 11111� C i�f,N � p 111=1� C �,tt pll ,t �1YY1111111 /�D\,�pl � • �� ttnnpll 1nD�OQ �/111111111 t1►t ' t11 �IIIII� rIn nD� �Iq �11111�11►11 11►Ot ppiIDmlt1:11111 I ' �t�111Pr� OR 'go, am r� .. .WE = Iln■fIL91111 ,•;t,`\/ IE;11 ii r� IlOtll li1111 rr � 1111f111 1'llll ' ►�� �� iRE M rOtlIp1111 ::► 00� ��� ••i1j1u ; IhIAM jj1�� �•�/ Iuunu,�ll Al w 22% a� 04 a _ 1 KKK e c . h. 0 �I�IIIIIII loo I��I�lilll III OR am RRR e a-, X- A s •O m a._ a ,Ho7a4:)H 833a— - ` I O rr o 6'inJ3iy31 - - - 'T�11/I i i • os = liazr 0 M .O 4 o- w of v ``� �tO` e � e a'33bj a uO ba •r, ,� dJpM O p0� "•� � A oc ss SZ sF CZ •v .d¢ 0 dq w.am ss "m *"� w F,a y.�y s IZ gt q Q sF 01 s ZZ Wla � SZ i'c � YJ is u 0 sa c N iZ 81 6' A w a p�� •`� `r �' 4 sr �o,o e q or of 6d �+ S ZI 4 is Lt ra LI .e�y d M1b n N m Q ri 91 ac SJ 61 O� N � 91 r1 an m os 6 A `•-,b .9Q 0� F O nfOl O� $ 41 o' ,t OQ g$g g$g W,- ~" j�[I R LI q FO r•- H H d w u dd n o � 91 .� 00£ r, ryy ��� ."•a ."'i W EI ; r of D N rl R' 4 £{O V 4 O i' O{ jw 2$ �^ Z� LZ AIR ss €aY elO n. a zwu,ua i e g / OM / I / e0 O =C H O Q N � U 25 R W U1 R O� _O ^O a C W •O I W I v I � z , , � 3 , , s , , <a NOV-10-2004 WED 08:47 AM .p 4 O+ a a6 & f FAX .o WIP.'1 y O J70M c 8 Triy� O °.a-r i1 y 37tn 3 ellr..m^^ Wr r � � �t1'I iPln1 MM T aK. J rrr rrve n»-' arN` Gn AM 0 5 77nav3s a U� 4 -na a I n � L 33vid 3d0731NY��' e � r sr SO n A 0 2 9 LL L I: to no NOV-10-2004 WED 08:48 AM FAX NO. P. 02 M O 4 I)vu O B • O decay �� RliML/ S °'ram a Q ag d R l J 8 I db NOV-10-2004 WED 08:48 AM FAX -10 m .. � Z V� c s �V,`P O F yM1O �Ov SAC ap� 4 ✓S 0 ` / 8 v zU 10�OJ OJ ^O CO `l • �9i , O o. ^U ar �y �•� Zs QCA spy a 09 h O V 2S 4 'e L / 4 _o a ? Oh 90 B 2xg t�� y 0 4 ` : HI WOLF CREEK INITIAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Appendix B — PARCEL LISTING (FY 2005-2006) The actual parcels subject to rates and charges for Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D beginning Fiscal Year 2005-2006 shall be those parcels within Wolf Creek and subsequent phases identified on the Riverside County Secured Roll at the time all TCSD rates and charges are submitted to the County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the tax roll for that fiscal year. The rates and method of apportionment outlined in this Report are consistent with the rates and methods previously approved by the TCSD Board of Directors for each applicable Service Level contained herein. However, all rates and methods described in this Report are subject to revision and modification within the prescribed parameters of the law. The actual rates and charges applied on the tax roll each fiscal year shall be apportioned and submitted according to the rates and method described in the final TCSD Annual Levy Report presented and approved by the Board of Directors at an annual Public Hearing. The following pages encompass a complete listing of all parcels within Wolf Creek subject to the TCSD Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D rates and charges beginning Fiscal Year 2005-2006. To the extent that these parcels will be further subdivided, the newly subdivided residential parcels will each be subject to the rates and amount charged and prescribed in this report for Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D. The rates and charges applied to each newly subdivided residential parcel will reflect the services provided and the development of each respective parcel at the time the rates and charges are applied. The table below provides a summary of the total proposed rates and charges for all properties within Wolf Creek based on the existing rates and charges per subdivided single family residential unit: Charge Existing Planned Future Subdivided Per Total Levy Subdivided Lots Subdivided Lots Lots (Estimated) SERVICE LEVEL Levy Unit Units Budget Unitsl Levy Units Levy Unitsi Levy Service Level B: Residential Street $25.68 1,811 $46,506 457 $11,736 1,354 $34,771 1,811 $46,506 Lighting Service Level C: Local Landscaping $129.00 1,811 $233,619 457 $58,953 1,354 $174,666 1,811 $233,619 and Slopes Rate Level # 1 (C-7) Service Level D: Refuse Collection $179.86 1.811 $325,726 457 $82,196 1,354 $243,630 1,811 $325,726 23 co V N N 0 O O 0 O O O O O O co O O O O O O O O co CO co co(O i W c0 aD W W ap co aD a0 a0 W W N W W N 00 00 M LO co co m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m j) N N V V V r nr- r n rr- n r r r rr� r r r r r 0) d N 0 M N N J N V) d) co V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) O O 0000000000000 O O O O O O d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V N n M O( Ln O O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O Lo N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0) >m OD (O m N N O) J V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) 6% V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V co 0 mmeoma000cococococococococococococo y m N m O O , W 0 W M 0 0 W 0 W* to W (O (O CO (O CO (o co V O (O (O O N Lo Ln Cn Lo Lo N U) Ln L N LA V) Lo N (n Cn U) iA � r N0 0) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N J � M d) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) N C C C C J 0) M r N N o cove - H c c c c 0 0 0 N y N N >>> > o a-0-0 m o mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm d U) (n in C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c m m d m m m m d d d m mmm m @vva-a-oaaaavavaa-ovvaa .co N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E W 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U.LL LL LL LL LL LL N c c c c c c m d d( d d (V Q) d d) d (D CD 0) N 0) N c c c C C C m m m m m m c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c a d a a a - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - m `- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a+ U O com 00 00 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 co 0000 00 0000 co 00 00 00 00 com m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m F � 0) N m m m m 0 m m W m W m On) 0) m m 0) m 0) m 0) N N " N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 'r' mmm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0) (Mo O 0 0 V v(o p d co00 V a co m 0 M Lo m N M V (O r M m 0 N M V t!) (O r CO m N .- N N N N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 V O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O M C? C? M M M M M C? M C? M M (M M C? M M M co (D (O (O O (O CO CO (O (t) (t) O (O O O O O (O m O (O O (O O O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m i Y F- W LY U WO- �aF U W (q O W Q0: HN Z� z 0 O U 3 w f W H W W W W 0 0 W W W W ow W 0 0 W W W W W W W 0 W W W W W W (O W N W 00 W W Co W W W W W W W W CO W W W Co W 00 W W N W W CO CO W 00 W 00 V W CA W 0) W M W. W. 0 W W 0) 0) m m 0) 0) W 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) m 0) 0) 0) •� d n n r n n n r r n r n n r r r r r r n n r n r r n r n r n n r � J V) N m (A (A EA m m ( A (A EA (A fA 6d (A (A (A m m m V) (A fA (A m (A (A 61i m (A fA y r o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U of N of of of of of N N of of of of of N of of of of of of of N � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d >�- rn d J fA E9 EA V3 fA EA E9 fA fA fA EA fA EA EA EA E9 fA fA EA fA fA fA EA fA E9 CO Vf EA fA fA co co 00WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW (.i m W (O co W W W W CO W (O W to CO co co (O (O (O W W (O W W W W W 0 W 0 0 W 2 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ln > N N N N N N N (� J M 64 6� (» (» (» of e» (» (» va (» (A (» (» fA (A (» (» M (» ua (» (» (» (» (» an (» ev (» a) 6 FT L CL Q m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 1cCCccCCcCCC C C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c N f0 N 0) N N N f0 N N h N N fN m 4) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) m 0) m 0) 0) O) 0) 0) m 0) m 0) 0) 0) O) 0) m O) 0) 0) 0) O) m 0) m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m (a m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL lL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. LL LL LL LL 0) m m 0) m 0) 0) m m 0) m 0) 0) () m N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) m m 0) 0) 0) () 0) 0) m C C C C C C C C C t C C C C C C C C G C C C C C C G C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w U W 00 00 00 W 00 w co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 W co co 00 w 00 W 0 00 00 00 W 00 00 00 00 ` M W W 0) 0) 0) M W W W W 0) 0) O M M W 0) 0) W 0) W W M 0) W 0) 0) CA M W mmmmmo)mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm0)m0mmm N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m@@@ m m m m m@ m m m@@@ m@ m m m@@@@ m C c c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c c c c c c c c c c c 0 C C C C @ d U a O N M V N W r W N M V W W n W d) O N M V 0 W n W W O, N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C, IL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W (P M m O O W 0 W m W W W W W W W m m W Q7 W m W W O W (n W Ln N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W CO W N N W W W W W 00 W W W W W W W CO W W W •� -y n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n w' yJ m (A fA <A (A !A (A (A fA fA <A m (A w fA (A (A fA (A !A (A (A m (A EA fA 69 w w w to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. 0 o. 0 o. 0 00000 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UV mmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmCA mCAm N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d c- 7 fA J va (A (» eA (» (A (» (» (A » (» (A (A (A (A e» (A fA (» (A eA (A eA EA (A (A fA (» <» (A (A WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW V m CO CO W W W W W W W CO W W W W (O CO CO CO W W Co. W CO W W W W W W W W •j Il) N iA N (Ci N (n N 0 N (n N (O N (A N (n N (n N In N In N In N to N Lo N �A N u'i N N N u! N ([! N m N LO N (n N (n N In N LO N N N N N In N LO N Lo N N 4) y J fA fA fA EA fA 69 fA FA fA 03,164 fA fA fA (A 641 641 E EA (A (A (A 6al (A (A fA !A fA <A (A N Q H 6 0 N @ @ f0 l6 (0 f6 5 l6 70 l0 @ f0 (6 l6 l0 l0 l0 f0 l6 f0 f0 l0 f0 f6 l6 70 f0 l0 76 70 1 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N 0) N@@ 0) N N N N N N N N@@ 0) 0) N N 0) N 0) N 0) -2 -2 va- ovavv -oavvva-oavavv ov-oava-o N N N !A (N N N fN N N N N 41 fn NZ NZ N N N N N (/1 Vl N N N N N N .E.L. .E.E.E.E.E..EEEE. .EE,£E.E.E.E, @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL _ _ _ _ @ @ _ _ _ _ _ N _ _ N _ _ _ _ _ _ N _ _ _ _ @ _ _ _ _ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N C1 00 W 600 co 00 00 co co 00 W 0D 0D 00 cb aD cb W 6 06 W 0D 00 00 00 c6 W aD 00 W au cc m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm0m0m0m H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C @ d V Q N N N N N N N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O @ �— O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 c- �— . e. a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M, M M M M M. M M M M M M M M M i M M M PO M M WWWW m m m m m m (O (O (D (D (O (D (D (D (O (O (O (D (O (D (D (O (D fD (O (D (O (D (D (0 (0 (0 (O (O (O (0 m roco ao meorom meo aomrocommweo meo ao maoromao 00e000wweo au U m a)0) m Oi m 01 (3) Oi fA m 0) 0) Oi 0) a) 0) a) m mm Oi OW fA (7i Oi O) Oi Oi m Oi Z y n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 4 Ol CO)J fA fA Vi fA fA fA fA fA fA fA EA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA M fA fA fA N 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Nommmomm N N N N N N N V > CO (DJ fA fA fA fA fA EA fA fA Vi N fA Eft fA fA EA FA 4) fA fA fA fA fA EA fA fA fA fA fA EA fA fA 00 m N 0o N 00 ao W ro ao fX1 0o co co w 00 0o ao ao w ao 00 00 0o co 00 00100 00 00 00 U m (fl (D f0 0 O (O CO O O Co. Co. fD (D (D (O O (O CD O (o O O fD (D (D O O (D (O (D (O •� (O N c) N (O N tO N LO N (O N (O N (A N (!) N tO N 0 N (O N (O N LO N LO N (O N (O N 6 N 6 N (n N (O 6 (0 6 (O (O (!') N N 6 N y N N N N N N N N N N N N (D J EA fA fA fA fA fA EA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA 69,1 9 fA fl> fA fA fA EA CO fA fA fA fA 613 fA fA fA Of C F C Q m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0) N N m m m m (U m m m m m N m 0) (U m m N m 0) m m -a v-o -ov o'2vvavva 2 �vvvaaavv'2v-o -oav,v_a-D N 41 N N N Vl N N N N N N Nl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M y N N 0) N N m m m m m N N (U m m m 0) N 0) N N m N 0) m 0) m m 0) N m 0) m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N _ N N N N _ _ N _ N N N N ? _ _ N _ N ? _ N N N N _ N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C U OD N 00 ml OD 00 00 c0 OD N W 8 8 00 W N W 8 W OD W 00 00 c0 a0 00 N 00 8 00 OD m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn N ... N N N N N N N rn N N N N N N ani N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C G C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m N U Q (O 0 n 00 M O .— N M V 0 O n M 0 O N M (D O n c0 T O N M (n N O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N 0 ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 00 0 m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N jL M (? M M M M M (? (? M M M M M (? (? M (M M M M M M (? M C? (M PM C? PM M O (0 O (D (0 (0 (D co (O O (o O (O (o (D co (D (D (o (D co 0 (O (D (D co (D co (o O (O rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn n N o w w w w o (o w (D (o (O (O w (O (O (o * cO co (o (0 07 (o (O (O to (O (O (O (O (0 CO OO 00 0O N 00 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 N 00 00 00 CO 00 N CO 00 00 00 O N N 00 00 00 N U 0) 0)M O M 0)M M@ M 0) 0) O 0) m M M 0 0 M 0) 0) M 0) 0)M M M M M 0 •2 —y r r r n r r r n n n n n n r r r r r r r n n n n n n n r r r r > N J N 61) w f9( A fA 6s V3 EA N fA<A(A 69 vi of w 69(4 N 64646s 64 ER 6s 64 64 64 y r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 N m m m m M m O m. N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a 0 (q N J fl3 fA Vj Hi Vj !A fA f9 fA 69 fA 64 V) Vi EA V) u) fA Vi EA M Vi 69 N fA fA 69 fA fA E9 fA ao� � M �(aoo �o � ��fl� 00 coco000000co00000000 00 co 00 co0000 co m� co(o (oco(oco cwo mm m o (o o •� 2N0Lo ui N ui N N 0 N N N N N N 6 N 6 N 6 N N NNNNN NN Lo N n N v N 0 N u N UN, uNi Nui Nui N NN 1Ni 0> Co JN fA fA EA A M vi fA fAN fA M EA fAfA EA A EA fR A fA fA A fAA Vf fA fA d a 0 a o m -a 7-0 m m m m m m m a m m m m o m(a m m m o m m m m 5 m m m 5 d c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 0) 0) 0) a 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) N -o v a -o v -o : o v a -o v a -o v v -o v: o a -o v a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a (I LL LL LL, LL. LL LL. LL. LL LL, lL LL LL, LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL, LL. LL LL. LL. LL lL LL LL. LL a 0 0) 0) _ 0) _ 0) _ N _ N _ N _ N _ N _ 0) _ 0) _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0 _ 0) _ a _ 0 _ 0) _ a) _ a _ 0) _ 0) _ N _ 0) _ a _ 0) _ 0) _ c c C c c c c cn c c C c c c c c c c c c C C c c c c c C c C c c CM P] 0•) M P9 M M M M C' ('M M M M (") <M P9 P7 C1 V OD 00 00 W 00 au W 00 00 � W aD W W OD 00 OD 00 ap CO OD W W OJ dD W � OD � OD � ` CA W O O CA CA W O CA T m CA m W W CA CA Cn 0 01 0 0 0 W O CA W CA Cn CP W H n r r r r n r n n n r r r r r r n n n n n r r r r n r n n n n W N O N N N T N CA N O N m N W N N N" N N N N N N N N N 0) N N " N N O N N N N N O N T N O N m N 0 N N N N N N N N N N N O N m m m m a a a a a a a m m a a a a a a a m a a a a a a a a a a a c C c c C c c c c c c c c c Im C C C C C C C C C C C C C c C C C a 01 U Q N M N M V LO W r 00 M N M V lA O r N M O, N M V to (O r 00 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a r)AA414vcvvvvv0000000000000000000 IL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C) M CM M M M M M M M M M M M Cl) Cl) m M (h <h M M M M M M M M 0? (h O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn 8 m (O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m (O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m •� y r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r a) y J Vi 64 fA fA fA to V) V) W EA Vi EA Vi Vi 64 Vi Vi V! Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi EA fA W EA Vi EA 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A U V W CA O) W CA W O) O) Q7 0 0) O) O m O d1 41 0 T 0) m m W CA M 0) Q) O) Cn O d) •� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y N > to d Vi V3 Vi fA Vi 64 fA Vi EA fA w w w Vi V) Vi to69 fA 69 Vi EA Vi N EA Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi co m m m co m m m m m m m co m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m co m um mmmmmm mmm(Ommcommmm(omm(oco(D(DCOmmmm(Om •Z L m m )O In )O )O LO )O m )O V) m m m V)m )O m m m 1n to N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N" N N N N N N N N N d 0 fn J EA fA Vi EA EA V! Vi W V) EA V) V) W EA Vi fA fA 69 EA 6 V) EA Vi Vi V! Vi EA fA Vi EA V! a) O. HT L a 0 fa (a l0 (a lO fa ca 75 R ca N @ N fa N (a (a N N fa @ z m m m m m m m m m (Lccccccccc�ccccccccccc�ccccccccc a) a) a) a) a) a) a) d d Q) d d d d ro a) ro ro 0 fu Q) a) a) (D 0 0 a) a) 4) a) (D a -0 -0 -0 70 -o v a a -0 a a -0 70 -0 a a -o v -o -0 -0 70 -0 -0 13 a 13 -0 -o -0 Q) 4) N 0) a) 4) a) 4) a) a) a) a) (D N 4) 4) a) 4) 0 0 V) V) Q) 4) a) (D CV a) a) (V 4) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LL LL LL. ll ll ll LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 11 ll LL ll ll LL LL LL LL LL ll LLa s a) a m N N aC;j m a) a) a 0) m a a a W a a) m(DC, () a N m m a a) a s c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c a c c c mmmomwow c c c c c c c r CM M (M P•) M (M M M M C•) (M M M M C? a•) a7 P7 M M M M M M CM M M P•) M P•) M V m m m 00 M a0 co W 0) 0) 0 fb 0) a) M 0) 0) 0 fb L O) CA m m O T O) M O Q) M O W E D7 M M W d1 T T m W M d) M a) M d) M O W M W M CP W M m W M W O M M rn m M rn rn M M M rn rn M M rn m M M M M M 0) 0) rn rn rn rn 0 M 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ N @ N N N @ @ @ @ c c c c c c c c c c C c C C c c c c c C C c c c c c c c c c c @ al V a O N M Q LO CO r m (A O N M V LO (O r m M O N M '7 LO m r m M O a) N N N N N N N N N N M M M co co M M M M M V V. v v v v"T v V' V LO ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ch (h M m M M M Eh M M M M M M M M C? M (h (M (h M M M M M M M th M (h m m m m m m m m m m m m m m (o m m m m m m m m m (o m m m m m m m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn N f0 (O CO (O f0 (O (O fO t0 (O (O f0 (O (O (O (O f0 (O (O (O (O (O (O (O f0 (O (O (O CO CO (O N 00 W OD W 00 Oi OD a0 N a0 CO of a0 a0 N N N 00 N OD a0 W a0 CO a0 a0 of OJ N N •2 —d n r r r r r r n r n n n n n r n n r r r r r n n n n r r n n r N J fA V3 N fA N N fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA FA fri fA fA fA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d U rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn w rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn •� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ... N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d > fA d J fA to fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA 69 fA to fA fA fA fA to fA fA fA 49 fA fA 69 fA fA fA 4)m fo fo co fo CO fo CO CO CO co co co co CO cn fo fo CO m ro fo CO ro co fo co fo fo fo fo m •� In In to 0 L L I 1 lA In to 1n 1n In to In In In N N In In 0 In In In 0 to In In 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N > a)N to EA fA EA fA EA fA 064 fA EA CO fA fA fA fA 69 fA fA fA fA fA M fA fA EA fA fA fA fA 69 d> d C. HT L C. o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 5 m m m m 1 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C C c c c c c c c c c C C d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d (D d d d d d a-ovava-ov7oava-ovvaaaavv-gvv72'03Mv_a,v_ o N M N N N N N Y) N N W tN 4) N N N bl U) U) !A d 0) d d d a) a) d d d d d d W d d 4) d) d d d d a) d d d a) d d d d d 0) d d a) d 4) d d d d @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ I d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ d _ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C M fM P•) M M fM M M fM M M M M M M M P7 M M M M Cl) Cl) Cl) M M In N to N a. co R m 0) m W a) 0) 0) 0) 0) m 0) m m 0) m m m m m m m m 0) 0) m T CD M CD CD n n r r r r r n r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r F m rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn N N N .. N N N .. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N @ @ @ @ N @ @ N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ d @ d V V Q M V LO O N M V In O r O m O N N M-ct 0 W r W N M I In d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ 0 0 0 0 0 0 . N N N N N N N N O 0 0 EL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M Cl) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M (O fD (O (O (O CO f0 (O (O (O (O (O (O (O f0 (O (O (O (O f0 (O f0 (O (O f0 f0 (O fO fD (O t0 rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m m rn rn rn fn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn O rM 0 0 0 (O (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (o (o (0 (O (O CO C0 (0 (0 c0 (O c0 (0 (O (O (0 N 00 00 00 co 00 co 00 00 co m CO 00 00 O 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 N CD 00 00 •� y r n r r r r n r r r n n r n n n n r n r r n n r n n r n n n r N N J EA 64 fA EA EA EA EA EA Vf EH EA EA EA W El) W W M W to EA CA EA EA EN EA fA E9 W EA EA o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 dn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vU •� mai ofm oim of of mof m m m of m m mai of of m of m mof m 0 of M ofm N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w > � � � � I � � I � � � � � � I � I � a I n c I I I � � � � dl d J EA fA fA fA fA f9 fA fA f9 fA Vj V3 fA Vl fA EA V3 fA fA EA Eli EA ER fA Vj EA fA fA EA fA V! m ao ao m ao co eo ro m eo co eo m ao m oo eo m ao m m ao eo m w eo ao o� 0o co m m (O O O W W O (o * O O O c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 O m O O m m O O O O O O c0 O O U N N N N N N N N 0) j N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y J fA FA fA fA N FA W fA 'A EA CO to (Al fA fA EA M EA fA fA ♦A FA EA fA FA fA fA 63 fA 63 FA m Q. H CL 2 l6 fli (O l6 (6 t6 l6 f0 (6 l0 76 76 a f0 f0 f0 5 t6 lO 70 <0 6 f0 <0 (O lO fO 75 75 lO 70 dCCCC C C c c C c c C c c C C C c C c c c c c c c c c C C c m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m v�:ova-ova-ov'o'o o-2-2-2-2-9vva-2va-2av o;ov:o N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ..EEEEE.E.EE.EEEEEE.E.E.EE m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL m m m m m m .222 m U m 0 U d m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Cn I? L9 L9 L9 t0 L? 9 Cn Cn N LI? l0 Ln N M L? Cn Cn Cn N l0 l0 Lo L? L9 9 N Cn 9 Cn U 00 00 00 00 co co 00 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 co 00 00 00 00 rn M M rn rn rn rn rn M rn M F rn rn m rn M rn M M rn m m o m m m o m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m C C m O) U Q (O r M 0 O N M t t0 O n M m 0 N M-CT 0 0 n N M-�r N O n M m N 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD o 0 0 0 01210 0 0 0 LL M M M M M M M M C) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M <M M M M M 00 M M M M M M C0 M M M M Cl? I M CM CM M M M M M M M CM M C? (o M (O CO (O (o (D [O Co (0 CO O N CO (O m O O O CO CO to CO (O O O O O (O to CO I m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mmmmmm m M m (o (o m m m m m co m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m y m@ m@@@ m m@ m m m N m m m m N m m m m m m m m@@ m@@ u� oiofoioioiaiofaioioioioioiofoioioiaiofoimofmofofmofmofmof •2 y n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n CO)J N 6) fl3 fA fA fA EA EA fA 60i fA EA Ni V) to EA EA EA (A fH N fA U9,64 fA 4B fA fA fA fA M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � U •� of of m of of of of ai of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of ai N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y d J fA Efl fA fA fJ3 fA to fA fA EA fA E9 N FA FA M to N V! M to fA fA fA N fA fA fA fA fA to m m m m m m m m m m m m m oo m m m m m m m m 00 m m m 00 m 00 00 m V m (O m (O CO m (O (o CO (O CO (O (O (D (O (O (o (O (o m to CO CO CO CO (O (O (O m CO m CO N N N N N N N N N N N Z 0) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N J Cn fA fA fA fA fA fA fA V) fA to fA fA Vi EA fA fA f9 fA fA M M fA fA E9 fA fA fA N Vi fA EA S F G o m m m m m m m 5 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -Ea m m m m m m m d c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c N N N N N 41 Vl N N N N N N tll N t� N N N N N tn N N .N N N Vl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (U N N N N N N N (U N fU N N N N N N N . 21 . cc @@@@@@ @@@co @@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m @ @ @ @ @ LL LLLLLLLLLLLLLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. LL LL LL LL _ @@NW@NN_ N@@@_ N_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N _ _ _? ________E____ c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 9 9 L? N M N CO NLI? In 9 9 In N L9 N CO N 9 N 9 9 to N Y V wYwg00 u mmmm00mmm(Dmmmooao00mao0)0)0)m )0)m o�mmm@@ m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn r n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n N. N. n n n n n n n n n n n N N N N rn N rn N N N rn N N N (n N N N N N rn N rn N rn N rn N N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N" N N N @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ co (o @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ C C C C C C C C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c CA @ 0) V a O N M V (O CO n N M V N m n m M O N M V N O N M V N M W N N N N N N N N N N CV CV N N N N 0 0 0 0 CL M M m M m P•) M M M M M m o•) M M M M M M M M M M M V cT V V V V V M M M M M M M Ch (h M M M M M M MC? M CM CM M M M M CM M M M M M M m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn N co m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 000000 mmmmm m 00 y m m m m m m CO m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m U� mmmDimmmmmmmmmDimmmmmmmm M mmmmmmm •2 y r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r d d Vl J V) V) V) Vi V) V) V) Vi M fA 64 V) V) V) V) V! to w V) (A V) 64 V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) r o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 00000000000 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U •Z M M M of of m ai of of of LT of of er LiJ L'A m m LT Di of LF of LT of m ai LT LT m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N R j V1 4) J »<»ViV)Vi Vf V)»»e»»(»»�V)V) VifAF»<»»»»»E»»»e»V)V)Vi m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m V m m Co. m m m c0 m m Co. Co. m Co. m m m t0 c0 co (o m m m m m m m m m m co 0•� m 0 0 0 N 0 Ln N m m m m Ln 0 0 m Ln lA m m LD N m LD m LD LD m 0 Lo N W j N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y V) J V) V) Vi V) V) FA 64 Vi FA N N V) V) V) N Vi V) V) FA fA V) N V) V) V) V) V) fA V) FA fA LU Q. HT L a O` N N f6 N a N N @ 76 fO 75 N f0 f6 a f0 f0 f0 f0 f6 f6 f0 f6 f0 f6 a f0 75 70 70 76 acccccccccccccccc�cccccccccccccc N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LU N N N N vv-ov-av:o vav-oaav'ov o-ovv-ovavva o:o-o N Vl N N N N N N N N N N N N Vi N N N !A N N N tN N N N N N f/1 !A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N R R R R m m m m m R R R m R R R m R R R m m R R m m R R R R R LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C gygvcoqqyVVvv55YVyVvvvyqqqqVVvvv u mmmmmwaommmmmmCDmmm0)0)m 00 m rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn m rn mmoommmoo0)romw rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn N N N m N N N N N rn rn rn rn rn rn rn N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N co R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R (aR R R R R R R R R co d C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C R v u Q LD (O r m m O N M V m (o r m m 0 N M V m m r m m 0 N M V NV O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M ` O O O O O O 99999999 O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R a v v v v v v c v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v M M (`) M M M M M M M th M M M M M M M M (? (h M M M M M M M M M M m m m m m m m m m m m (D m m m m m co (D m m m m m m m (O m (D m m mim m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Y f-H w0U WOE U w~q LSO O�w 3UU a� Fy z O 3 U W H m m m m m m m (D m m m m m m (O (O m m m 00 m m m (O (O (O f0 CO m m y W W W W W m N m 00 m CO W CO W CO CO W W W W W W 00 m CO 00 00 m W W W U m m O) MO) O O O) O O) O O) O m m m O) m O m m m m m m m m m m m m •2 y r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r d m M J fA fA fA fA fA EA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA M fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA r o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C J fA fA fA FA fA N V3 Vi EA fA fA fA fA fA fA W fA fA fA (A fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA m m m W co W ao W W m W m m m co m m m m m m m m 00 m W co W 00 co W Vm mm mmmmm(0(0 C0 m m CO m m m m m m m m m m m m m m(O CO W(O •� m LO W m m m m (0 T N (0 10 C0 (0 Lo N Lo m m m N m m m m N 0 0 U( m 0 > N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0) W N J fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fri fA Vi fA fA fA fA fA EA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA O) >1 0 C. o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m d C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m m m N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m d m m m m C c c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C IT g IT v v IT IT q W W W W m m m W W W W W W m m m W W W W W W m 0 W W co w w mm W 00 00 00 w m m co 06 00 00 m w m m 00 00 W m 00 00 00 wm ` m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rn r r r r r m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mmmmmm m m m C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c c c c c c c C c c C m m d L V Q 0 m r W m 0 N M V m m r m m 0 N M N M v 0 m r W m 0, N 0) M M M M M v v v v v v v v v N N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N N N N N N N N N N N N a v v v v v v v v v v v v IT v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v M M (h C? M CM M 111. M m m M M M M C? M Ch CM M M M M M M M M M M M M M m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m M Yhf WKU WOa (If UWq LLof p O>W U QK Cl) Z� z 0 O U D W 2 W F (O fO (O CO C0 (O (D (D (O (D (O (D (O (O (D (D (O (D CO (O (D (O (O (D (O (O (0 CO OD W CO W m M W a0 N 00 CO N CO W m CO m N m N OD m au W W Co. W W m W W N m N d mmmmmmmm mmmmmmmm m m m m m(nmmm 0)0)mm 0) 0) •� —d r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r d � � U1 J EA Eli EA EA N EA to EA (A EA EA EA EA EA EA fA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 61i EA EA EA EA fA Eli r o 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0.0000.0.0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d U Di of of of Oi of of m Oi Oi Oi of of of m of of m of Di o o ai of of Di of ai of d > �- �- CA d J EA Vi FA fA EA FA EA EA fA fA FA fA fA EA FA fA fA fA EA EA fA fA fA fA EA EA fA EA EA fA fA co O 00 00 00 00 W CO aD W OD 00 CO O 00 W W a0 W w w w 00 00 co 00 00 c0 N co 00 d m fO CO m CD (O (O (D m (O O (O (O N (o (O CO CO CD fo (0 CO O CO (D CO (O to CD to CD CO V Lo (D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y J (A EA EA EA EA 6% 6- EA 6% EA EA EA w EA EA FA EA FA FA EA EA 6sl EA CA EA (fl N EA fA CA d a F a Q m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m dcccccccccccccc c c c c c c c c c c c c c E c c c d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d a ovavvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvavvvv N N N N N 0) N N N N N N N N N h N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL d — d _ d _ d — d _ d _ d — d _ d -a_ d d _ d 'a' d d — d — d _ d _ d _ d _ d — d _ d _ d — d _ d 'a' d d — d _ d — d — d _ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N Cb O W CO 00 W OD 00 00 M 00 00 co W 00 OD 00 W CO N 00 c0 W Cn OD (O (O (O O m 0 co m 00 00 00 00 00 m 00 00 OD 00 OD 00 m 00 00 00 00 O co OD 00 m 00 00 co 00 N 00 00 w m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m F- m m m m m m m m mm N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m d C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m d V Q M C m N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M C')M M m Ch 0 0 0 0 0 a v vv v v v v v cv vvv vvv v v v vvvvvv(n (n (n (no C? C? C?fh C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C?M T Ch C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? C? M C? C? C? C? C?(O (O (0 (O (O f0 O (D (D (D (D (D m (O O O O (fl m (O (0 (0 O O O N O (O m O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LO M YHF W0 W� o:ar UWU U W 3�U QK rw Z} Z 0 O U 5 0 U W E H m cO cO w w w m m w m co w fmno wmn wmn wrnn mmm mrnn fmnO wmn wmn wmn wmn mrnn mrnn m N CO CO N m 00 00 00 m m m m 0m 0 N m 0n0 u mn mn mn rnn rnn rnn rnn mn mn mn mwn rnn rnn mmn rnn rnm •�t -Jy fmnA EmnA fA fA fA fA fA AA fAA Af wwmn A A fA O 0 O 0 O 0 O o O o O 0 O0 O 0 o o O 0 O0 O 0 O 0 O 0 Cc) 0 O 0O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O d) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (A fD J fA OY N fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA b9 fA fA fA iA fA Un, fA fA fA fA UY fA fA fA fA fA fA m m m m m m m w m w m w w m w w w w w w m m w w w w w w w w m �m mwwmcommwwwwwmwwcommwwwmmmwwmcommw •� N fn LO N N ui N to 00 N N N fn N lf) to lt) to N fn N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O) J fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA EA fA fA fti w fA fA fA 49 fA fA fA fA fA fA fA fA to fA d CL H CL o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m L1 C c c C c c C c c c c c C c c c c c c c c C C c c c c c c c c N N N N N y y N N N N N Vl N N N N N N Vi f0 f/1 N N N N h N N N N m m N m N N m 0) m m m C) m 07 N N N N N N N N N (U fU m m m m N m E . .E .E .E E .E .E .E .E E . .E .E .E .E .E .E .E .E .E .E ,E ,E .E .E .E .E E E m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N _ N _ m N m m 0) m m m m m O) _ N _ N _ m _ m _ O) 0) N N N _ N _ C) N 0) m N m 0) m _ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C a m m w w w w m w w w 19 w (9 w w m m w m m m w w w w m m w m m m U m m m m m OD OD w m m m m m OD m w m m m m m w m m m m m m f`f7 M m m 0) CD m m m m m m rn rn CDM m m m m m rn rn rn M rn m m m m m rn rn rn H n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n m N m N m N rn N rn N m N m N m N m N m N rn N rn N rn N rn N m N m N m N m N m N rn N rn N rn N rn N rn N m N m N m N m N m N m N rn N m m m Co m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m CDm C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m d L) Q m n m M 0 N M � Ln CO n m m O, N M It w n m m O N M '7 00 0) O O O O O O O O O O O O O c- N N N N N N N ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 a to Ln Ln fn N LO Lo LO N w In LO In to N 00Ln 0 In In 1n 4i Ll') Ln �n th CM CM M C? M M fh fh C] M C? M M (m fm M MM M" M M M M M M fh M M M M M w w w w m w w w w m w w m m w w w m w w m m m m w w w m m m m m rn rn m m m rn m rn m m m rn rn m rn rn m m m m 0)0)m rn rn m V W W (O CD W W W co W W W W (O 000 (O t0 (D W W W W W (O CO CO (D (O W W W W W W 00 00 W W W 00 W W c0 W W W N N m m W W W W W W W 00 N W W W U W 0) m M(n M CD Di M O) M 0) W 0) (A a) D) 0) 6 T 6 6 W W W 66 6 6 0 M —y n r r n r r r r r n n n n n n r r r r r n n n n n r n r r r n W CD•� y J V) to of V) of % % % V) Vi (A V) V) to V) V) V> Vi V) EA fA fA fA to V) V> (A V> V) fA fA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V U rn rn O) O d) m m W D1 O m m d) d) Q) O O W D1 O W 01 O O O d) T T W m W N j y d J fA (A V) (0 W W Vf V) VJ Vi V> fA W fA fA Vl CO V) V) V> V! V) V) Vd EA 64 CO V) V) V) Vi WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW V m W (O W W W W W (O CO (O CO W CO (D (D (O (O (O W (O (O W CO CO (O Co. (O c0 W W W •� 0 0 0 (O CO (O N (D 6 6 N 6 N Lo (O (O (O (O 0 0 0 (O N (O (n (D ui N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m 7 (n J V> V) V) V) Vi V) VJ V) fA V) V) (A V) CO V) V) V) VJ V) V) V) di di V) V> V> V) VJ V) V) V) N C H d C. 0 0 6 0 6 T 0 (6 N T(6 T 0 6 O O 0 0 0 6 T N T3 R 0 T 6 0 6 6 0 L d c C C CCCCCcccccccCCCCCCcCcccCCCCC m m m m m m m N 0) N 0) m N N m m m m m m N N m m m m m m m m m v a a a: o v a -o v a v v a a v a v a -o v v: o v v: o a'2 'o v v -o N tq N !A Ul y N N N N Ul N fN N N N N N tq N N N N N N fN N N N N 41 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N EEEEEEEEE E.E.E.EE.E.E,�Em m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL CLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL CL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL m m m m m d m m m m a? d m m mmmmmm m m mm m m m mm C C C C C C i C C c C C C C C C C C C [: C C C C C C C C C C (D(D(Dm(D(Dm(D(D(Dronrrnnnnnnnnrnnrrnnnn u 0o W W 0)00 W 07(O 0) ro w ao ao 0) w 0o 0o 0000 ` m MM w rn rn CD rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn m rn Mw w rn CD rn rn rn rn rn M rn rn M rn M rn rn rn rn rn rn rn I- M M CD rn M rn rn rn rn m rn rn m rn M M M M M M M M M M 0 m M M 0 M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C -a 'a 'mC C C C C m N v V Q r W M O N Cl) V CO (O n N cM V Cn W n W O O N N M 7 in (O r W 0 N N N M Cl) Cl) Cl) M Cl) CO M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2999999999999999999999,999990000 m d � LO iO (O (O � (O In 0 0N W W W W W W 000 (D W (O W co W W W W W W M CM M M M M M M M M C? M M M M M M M M C? C? M M M M M M M M M M W W W W (O W W W W W W W W W W W W W (D W (O W (O f0 W W W W W W W O m m O O m m W m m m m W W m O W m m m m d) O m O O r• M O O O O O (D O co O O O O O O O O O O O O co O O O O O O O O O W M W W W W W W W W W W M M M W W W co W W W W W 00 M N M M CO M M V O O m m m m O O O O O O m O m m m m O O O OM O m m m m m m m •� —y r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N O J fA 61) fA 69 69 fA (A fA fA N W fA fA fA ffi fA 69 Vi fA fA fA fA fA fA 64 fA fA fA ffi oil fA r O 0 o 0 O 0 O 0 O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 o O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 o O O o d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V U 'Z m O O m m m m m m m m O m m m m m m m m m of m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N >�- fu J fA fA fJi fA fA fA EA fA N fA fli fA fA fA Kf fA to FA fA fA fA 6-3 M fA N fA fA fA N fA Vi W M W W W W W W W W W W M W M M W W W W W W co W W W W W 00 M W �m co co'ofofoCo Co. Co(o'offlfofof9fDuofflfoCo(OWCO(oW(OtDcofo(ofof9W •� 41 Ll') N In N In N In N In N In N In N In N Lo N 0 N Yi N 0 N In N In N In N In N In N In N In N N 0 N 1A N 0 N I N to N L N In N 0 N In In N N N 7 N N N J fA 6Y Vi fA EA fA fA 69 fA EA fA Ui fA fA fA fA Vi 69 fA fA fA fA FA fA fA fA ffi fA fA fA fA d Q F Q l0 (0 (6 l6 N (6 l0 <0 @ 76 (6 76 76 N f0 c6 (6 (6 (fi (0 (0 f6 l0 f6 @ c6 WO f6 70 (6 70 accc c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c N N N N N N@ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 N N N N N N f/1 N tN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y N N N N N N N 41 N N N fU N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N M N N .E..EEEEE.EE.E.E.EEEEEE.E.E.E.EE.E.EE.E.E @@@@ M M M M M@@ M M@ M M M M@ c6 @ M M M M M M@ c6 @ M LL LL LL LL LL LL. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Nc C c C C C C C C C C C G C C C C �11 C C C C C C C c C C c c r r r r rr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rr u 000000co00co0000ooco00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00co00 00 00 00 0000co000000co00 m m O m m m m m m O O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O m m m m H r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O N m N m N m N m N m N O N O N m N m N m N m N m N O N O N m N O N m N m N m N m N m N O N O N m N m N m N m N m N m N 0 N N @ @ M @ @ @ @ M M M (am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ N @ @ @ @ @ c c c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c c c @ N V Q O O N M IT 0 M r M m 0 N CO It In W r W M 0 N M 7 iA W r M O d O — N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M ` O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o o o @ IL � � Q (0 (0 w w w w 0 (0 c0 (o (0 co (0 w (0 (0 w w 0 w W D M co M co co (O (O (O (O M M c? M M M M M M O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M (? th M M M M W M M M M (o W M M M M W W W M M M M W W W (O W W M M W W (o W M m m 0 m m m m 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0 (a(o(ow00(o w 00 w w v 0) 0) 00 2 r � 00 d > N U) J 00 M fA(A 44(R61! 64 (A o 0 0 0 0 o a d r o 0 0 0 U ai of of of N N N d > N M M y (D M w V) (A co w EA (A w w w w a w m d m co to co (D O Z d N N N N N� b > V% J N m 6s U�l N 61) m C R C LL C � y C C M m .0 M O 00 d T F c C 16 a >. o o L N O CL > > A O` A N l6 f0 d N a U) 0 a" avva m m 2` N N N U N N O 21 .� .@ .E d a) a ca LL 11 LL LL a a N d N N N N C C U C C C C - C - C - C - (0 m A El a v y 4) (V x r rrr- - c and U 00 c6 OD 00 rrrr(o(a mmmmvv > va N N N N 0 � N .a Cl) M a0 d y d a N f6 (6 l6 f0 N O C C C C M M C `) N � V N � C d m 10 m Q t ro E L) d O 0-6 O ` 999999 y m V mui d mco CO coww M M M m O O in d O (o (o (o (O (No (Na O O m m m m m Z m Cl) ITEM 7 APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY Gv iw - FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Sub -Committee For The Ronald Reagan Sports Park RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors appoint two Board Members to serve on an ad - hoc sub -committee to address issues related to a proposed memorial at the Ronald Reagan Sports Park. BACKGROUND: On September 28, 2004, the Board of Directors approved a recommendation from the Community Services Commission to rename the Rancho California Sports Park the Ronald Reagan Sports Park. Residents on the committee have expressed an interest in creating a memorial at the Ronald Reagan Sports Park that illustrates the reason for changing the name and also recognizes volunteers who assisted in the development of the sports park before the City's incorporation. This ad -hoc sub -committee will serve to provide input and direction as to the scope of the memorial, location and other pertinent information. FISCAL IMPACT: With the renaming of the park site, two entry monument signs will have to be replaced at an estimated cost of $12,000. The exact cost of an additional monument honoring the later president and those who helped to construct the park, will be determined once a final design has been approved by the City Council. RAZIGLERG\REPORW62204 BOD Children Museum.doc TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary Harveston Community Park is located in the Harveston Development, a large Specific Plan development in the northern part of the City east of Interstate 15. The park site will include two dedicated full size lighted soccer fields; 2 lighted ball field with 90' bases; age appropriate play areas; a group picnic area; community building; restroom/concession/maintenance building; parking with approximately 300 spaces; benches; tables; drinking fountains and walkways. This park site is currently in the 90 day maintenance period and staff anticipates dedicating this park site in the next 45 days. RHA Landscape Architects has prepared the construction documents for the improvements to Vail Ranch Park Site "C" Pablo Apis Park adjacent to Pauba Elementary School. This project is identified in this year's CIP. The new amenities will include a tot lot, picnic shelter, tables, benches and walkways. A contract for the construction project was awarded on May 11, 2004. The improvements are near completion. The conceptual Master Plan for the Wolf Creek Sports Complex is complete. The 43 acre park will offer parking, restroom/concession buildings, maintenance building, four lighted basketball courts, four lighted soccer and four lighted softball/baseball fields, tot play equipment, picnic areas and walkways. This project has been bid and a contract has been awarded for construction, which should begin in approximately 45 days. A Dedication Ceremony for the Veteran's Memorial was held on November 11, 2004. The project entitled "Letters Home' consists of a bronze statue of a soldier sitting in a bunker, writing a letter home. Sixteen letters written by service men to family are mounted in bronze on the monument. In addition all branches of the military are acknowledged and a Liberty tree is planted in a raised planter. The design of the memorial includes the installation of pre -ordered engraved pavers. Over 700 pavers were ordered to memorialize military personnel who are serving or have served our country. R AZI GLERGVCDEPTRPT1 1 104.doc In August 2004 the City Council approved the conceptual design for the Nakayama Garden at the Temecula Duck Pond. The Nakayama Garden is designed to reflect a traditional Japanese Garden. A dedication ceremony was held on Friday, November 19, 2004. The Erle Stanley Gardner exhibit at the Temecula Valley History Museum has completed the plan check process. This project recreates Erle Stanley Gardner's office in his Temecula residence known as Rancho Del Pisano. The exhibit area will also include other Erle Stanley Gardner artifacts and memorabilia. Staff anticipates this project is currently out to bid. The closing date is November 30, 2004. The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects within the City including Wolf Creek, Roripaugh, Villages of Old Town and Harveston, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the contract for refuse and recycling, cable television services and assessment administration. The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of all City parks and facilities, and assist in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation Division currently is preparing for the annual Holiday Parade, Holiday Lights and Festive Sights, the Tree Lighting Ceremony, Winter Wonderland and more. RAZIGLERGADEPTRPT 1104.doc REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NOVEMBER 9, 2004 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:36 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, and Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS Naggar, Stone, Washington, and Comerchero ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 2004. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Agency Member Roberts who was absent. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comments. R: Minutes.rda\110904 ADJOURNMENT At 7:37 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, November 23, 2004 in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CIVIC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R: Minutes.rda\110904 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 9, 2004 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public Financing Authority was called to order at 7:37 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 4 AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Stone, Washington, and Naggar ABSENT: 1 AUTHORITY MEMBER: Roberts Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes IaXeZiuu I a►l_ •► 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 28, 2004. MOTION: Authority Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Authority Member Stone and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Authority Member Roberts who was absent. PUBLIC HEARING 2 Roripaugh Ranch RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Open and continue the public hearing to the meeting of November 23, 2004. Finance Director Roberts briefly reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material). Mayor Naggar opened the public hearing. There were no requests to speak. MOTION: Authority Member Stone moved to continue the public hearing to November 23, 2004. The motion was seconded by Authority Member Comerchero and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Authority Member Roberts who was absent. RAMinutes.tpfa\110904 1 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Nelson noted that this Community Facilities District will be close to completion. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 7:39 P.M., the Temecula Public Financing Authority meeting was formally adjourned. Michael S. Naggar, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CIVIC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:wlinutes.tpfa\110904 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: Temecula Public Financing Authority FROM: Shawn Nelson, Executive Director DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) RECOMMENDATION: That the Temecula Public Financing Authority continues the Public Hearing related to the Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) to Tuesday, December 7, 2004 at 7:00p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ITEM 10 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City,Council CW FROM: Debbie Ubnosk irector of Planning DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Target Corporation, PA03-0726, Minor Conditional Use Permit and Findings of Public Convenience and Necessity PREPARED BY: Dan Long, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council uphold the Planning Commission decision. 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL FOR A MINOR CONDITONAL USE PERMIT AND FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECCESSITY TO ALLOW THE SALES OF BEER AND WINE (TYPE 20 LICENSE) WITHIN AN EXISTING 101,909 SQUARE FOOT TARGET STORE LOCATED AT 29676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-320-053 BACKGROUND: On December 23, 2003, the Target Corporation applied for a Minor Conditional Use Permit to sell beer and wine for off -site consumption (Type 20 license). This application went before the Planning Commission on April 21, 2004 and was denied 4-1. Commissioners Matthewson, Olhasso, Guerriero and Telesio voted to deny the application. Commissioner Chiniaeff voted to support the application. On May 6, 2004 the applicant filed an appeal requesting that the City Council overturn the Planning Commission denial. DISCUSSION: The staff report to the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Minor Conditional Use Permit and the findings of convenience and necessity for the proposed project. The Planning Commission voted to deny the project 4-1 as mentioned above. The applicant spoke in favor of their application by stating that over 40 Target stores in Northern California are now RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp= Staff Report-1.doc 1 selling beer and wine, and due to this success, the Target program is now expanding into Southern California. There were no other comments from the general public for or against the project. The Planning Commission discussion focused on the necessity for additional sales of beer and wine and the fact that the census tract is considered to be `over -concentrated" by virtue of the existing population. Based on the existing population of the census tract, Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) recommends a maximum of five (5) Type 20 permits in Census Tract 0432.16. There are currently nine (9) Type 20 permits issues for this census tract (see attached map). Commissioner Guerriero commented that there is not a public need or a convenience to approve an additional Type 20 license in the census tract. Commissioner Mathewson was also concerned about approving an additional Type 20 license in an over -concentrated area. Chairman Telesio held the opinion that staff should review the zoning ordinance because it is difficult to approve the proposed project (big box stores) when the City denied a similar request for a smaller store last year. Conversely, Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern about denying the request and mentioned that the census tract boundaries are arbitrary; commercial areas have less population, and that these are the areas that are typically permitted to sell alcohol. Commissioner Chiniaeff further commented that the City should be consistent and permit commercial establishments to sell alcohol even if ABC considers the tract to be over - concentrated. If the City determines that over -concentration is the criteria for making its decision, then the zoning ordinance should be changed to prohibit alcohol sales in commercial zones. In considering this appeal, the Council should first decide whether the CUP findings can be made to permit Target to sell beer and wine at their location, i.e. will this be detrimental to the surrounding community? If findings can be made to support the CUP, then the Council should determine whether there is a public convenience or necessity (PCN) to add another Type 20 (off -sale beer/wine) alcohol license in Census Tract 0432.16. Staff has attached a map showing the types and distribution of alcohol permits that have been issued for the census tract. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Resolution No. 04-_to deny the appeal 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2004-019 denying MCUP 3. Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes (April 21, 2004) 4. Exhibits (Aerial map, 500 foot separation radius map, census map) 5. Appeal Application and correspondence from Applicant RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp= Staff Report-1.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 04-_ RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp= Staff Report-t.doc 3 RESOLUTION NO. 04-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL FOR A MINOR CONDITONAL USE PERMIT AND FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO ALLOW THE SALES OF BEER AND WINE (TYPE 20 LICENSE) WITHIN AN EXISTING 101,909 SQUARE FOOT TARGET STORE LOCATED AT 29676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-320-053 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Target Corporation, filed Planning Application No. PA03-0726, Minor Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the application for the Project was processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by the California Environmental Quality Act; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on April 21, 2004 to consider the application for the Project; WHEREAS, following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-019, denying Planning Application No. 03-0726 subject to the conditions of approval; WHEREAS, Target Corporation, filed an appeal for Planning Application No. PA03- 0726, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to sell beer and wine (Type 20 license); WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Planning Commission proceedings as a Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA03-0726; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA03-0726 (Minor Conditional Use Permit — Appeal) on November 23, 2004, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition to Planning Application PA03-0726; WHEREAS, on November 23, 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula upheld the denial of the Planning Commission when it adopted Resolution No. 04-_. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings (Minor Conditional Use Permit): A. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Community Commercial) designation as well as the standards within the RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp\CC Reso Draft.doc Development within the Development Code. The proposed project is not within 500 feet of a public park, religious institution or school B. The proposed project is not compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures. C. The nature of the proposed use would be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the project would provide for additional alcoholic sales in a census tract area that is currently over -concentrated with type 20 licenses. Section 2. Findings, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings (Public Convenience and Necessity): A. Does the proposed establishment have any unique features, which are not found in other similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, or other special services)? Target offers a broad range of products (including clothing, food & beverage, kitchen and household items, home decor, toys, electronics, sporting goods, stationary, supplies, garden center) and services (pharmacy, film processing) all in one location. While other businesses sell some of the same products, Target offers customers the convenience of one -stop shopping for a variety of products. B. Does the proposed establishment cater to an under -served population (i.e. patrons of a different socio-economic class)? Target offers many items and offers convenient and affordable shopping for all income levels. Target does not cater to an under -served population. C. Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment (i.e. sales in conjunction with gasoline sales, etc.) be unique or differ from that of other establishments in the area? The proposed operation would not be unique or different from that of other establishments in the area. D. Are there any geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barriers (i.e. freeways, major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from other establishments? There are not any geographical boundaries or traffic barriers separating the establishment from other establishments. However, in addition to providing shoppers the convenience of one -stop shopping, adding wine sales will compliment the food and beverage items that Target sells now, and provide a convenience to Target's customers by eliminating the need for additional shopping trips. Target also plans to offer customers the opportunity to learn about the wines that Target sells through education events, led by professionals and wine industry members. E. Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a significant influx of population during certain seasonal periods? RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp= Reso Draft.doc During the various holiday seasons there is a significant influx of persons visiting the establishment because of the wide range of items offered. F. Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within the Census Tract of the proposed establishment? There are a total of 12 Type 20 licenses in Census Tract 0432.16 and a total of 5 are allowed in said tract. G. Are there any sensitive uses (i.e., schools, parks, hospitals, churches) in close proximity (500 feet) to the proposed establishment? There are not any sensitive uses within 500 feet of the Target building entry. H. Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive areas? The proposed use would not interfere with any sensitive uses because it is more than 500 feet away from the entry of Target. I. Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their property by the residents of the area? There are no residents within 100' of the property, and fewer than 30 residences within 600' of the property. Because of the physical separation factors between the Target store and the closest residences, and because the operations of the store will remain essentially the same as they are now; the proposed operations will not interfere with the quiet enjoyment of residents. Target prides itself in being a good neighbor and is committed to serving the community in a positive and responsible manner. We anticipate no adverse impact on the residents or general public by the issuance of the license. J. Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area? The Police Department has not provided any statistics or information indicating that the Target store is in a high crime or problem area for law enforcement. The Police Department was notified of Target's license application by staff and the ABC, and had no objections to or concerns regarding the issuance of the license. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of November, 2004 Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp= Reso DraR.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 04-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23`d day of November, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RAM C U P\2003W-0726 Target Corp= Reso Draft.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004-019 RAM C U P\2003\03-0720 Target Corp= Staff Report-t.doc 4 PC RESOLUTION NO.2004-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION PA NO. 03-0726, A REQUEST FOR MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TYPE 20 (OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOL LICENSE FOR TARGET LOCATED AT 29676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.921-320-053. WHEREAS, Beth Aboulafia, representing Target Corporation, filed Planning Application No. PA03-0726, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0726 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA03-0726 on April 21, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission denied Planning Application No. PA03-0726, after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA03-0726 does not conform to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in denying Planning Application No. PA03-0726 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Community Commercial) designation as well as the standards within the Development within the Development Code. The proposed project is not within 500 feet of a public park, religious institution or school. B. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures. C. The nature of the proposed use would be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the project would provide for additional alcoholic sales in a census tract area that is currently over -concentrated with type 20 licenses. ram: RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corpx]Final PC Denial Rest, doc Section 3. DENIED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on this 21't day of April 2004. �k, John Ilesio, Chairperson ATTEST: 2.066f'� D be bid Ubnoske, Secretary (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-019 as duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of -- the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 213t day of April 2004, by the following vote: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso Telesio NOES: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp\Pinal PC Denial Reso.dm ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AND MINUTES (APRIL 21, 2004) RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp= Staff Report-1.doc 5 STAFFREPORT— PLANNING (J%\NA1. CITY OF TEMECULA OR, PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: April 21, 2004 Prepared by: Dan Long Title: Associate Planner File Number PA03-0726 Application Type: MCUP Project Description: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale of beer and wine (Type 20 license, off -site) within an existing 101,909 square foot Target retail building, located at 29676 Rancho California Road (APN: 921- 320-053). Recommendation: CEQA: ® Approve with Conditions ❑ Deny ❑ Continue for Redesign ❑ Continue to: ❑ Recommend Approval with Conditions ❑ Recommend Denial ® Categorically Exempt ❑ Negative Declaration (Class) 15301 ❑ Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan ❑ EIR RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Cotp\STAFF REPORT-l.dm 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Applicant: Target Corporation, Beth Aboulafia Completion Date: March 2, 2003 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: June 2, 2004 General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: North: South: East: West: Lot Area: Commercial Center Total Floor Area/Ratio Landscape Area/Coverage 7.03 acres N/A Parking Required/Provided N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY ® 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The proposed project is a request to sell beer and wine (Type 20 license, off -sale beer and wine) in an existing retail commercial store, Target. The Development Code (Section 17.10) requires all uses not serving beer and wine at a restaurant to obtain a conditional use permit. The Development Code also states that any business selling beer and wine shall be no closer than 500 feet from any public park, religious institution or school. Staff's policy for measuring the 500 foot separation from religious institutions and school, is from the nearest door of either use. Parks are measures from the nearest door of the proposed use to the closest property line of the park. The GIS department has provided the necessary maps and staff has verified that the proposed use is not closer than 500 feet from any religious institution, school or public park. There are two parks in the vicinity, the Duck Pond (approximately 800 feet from door to property line) and the Margarita Community Park (approximately 800 feet from door to property line). There is one religious institution located on the south side of Rancho California Road; however it is approximately 700 feet from the entrance of Target to the entrance of the religious institution. RAM C U P,2003\03-0726 Target Cotp\STAFF REPORT-Ldw The Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has provided conditions of approval. Staff has verified through the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control that the project site is within census tract 0432.16. Currently a total of 12 Type 20 licenses exist in said tract; 5 are allowed. Since this census tract is over -concentrated with Type 20 licenses, Public Convenience or Necessity Findings are required. The proposed project is consistent with Section 17.10 of the Development Code. Staff feels that the findings for a Minor Conditional Use Permit can be made. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ® 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 15301, existing facilities, no expansion of facilities) CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the findings for a Minor Conditional Use Permit. In addition, staff recommends the Planning Commission determine that the project is exempt from CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301, existing facilities FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.040.010E) 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial ) and Zoning (Community Commercial designation), as well as, the standards within the Development Code. The project is not less than 500 feet from a religious institution, school or a public park. 2. The proposed minor conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed minor conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide additional convenience for the community, and allow Target to be competitive with other businesses selling beer and wine. 3. The nature of the proposed minor conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general RAM C U M003\03-0726 Tuget CorpWAFF REPORT-1 Am welfare to the community because the project will provide an additional convenience to the community, which will reduce vehicle trips and the site consistent with the city policies regarding separation of sensitive uses. In addition, the City Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has issued conditions for approval. ATTACHMENTS Plan Reductions — Blue Page 5 2. PC Resolution No. 2004-_ — Blue. Page 6 Exhibit A: — Conditions of Approval 3. Statement of Operation — Blue Page 7 RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Coip\STAFF REPORT-l.dm ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS RAM C U M003\03-0726 Target Cmp\STAFF REPORT-1 Am I sck: T xk a a^ > g } p r r y j �n :r c Kt r� _J f Y� tt 5 yy f" ! '3 � i s, t f'jL' a �t TT !__ F -'r — } _ � J ,-� rC '� t19'•.s't�r:y,�'+y� s''. IF hIM ig ie ' � � � r� j S an 'J.I� r ,s/ •s .*�,: Jam+"#/,�, '� j" r .r� �,' � JyR fT OVA ^ td„xr } t� r Ott- 5 {_'r T+ r l s � .• q mot\ d--to B F xtr, ap j hPl�'� t ..♦ _:i -r !&`a'r i 9>��""k - ^j��orsa`f }F. p' Highways Streets J ,.., ... ly! 200 0 200 400 Feet City of Temecula PA03-0726 Target, MCUP i A /U Highways Streets —, lbs MVwa mffi M N UY ofTOMOA xrok Parcels Parks " 200 A mAnT,ewoilmm.erj T&M." k f' o zoo 400 Feet des carp. TM�(T"t"'�°�� y4'>. D� b0�YfanMm#ft MIp ; Wwwm city YtmMmB/sOs^NOMrcum Yukb4Ab�bM ��ii mopaml Hm�M. Tbmpbn0.6�Yla�male. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004 RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Cotp\STAFF REPORT-1 dw PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PA NO. 03-0726, A REQUEST FOR MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TYPE 20 (OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOL LICENSE FOR TARGET LOCATED AT 29676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-320-053. WHEREAS, Beth Aboulafia, representing Target Corporation filed Planning Application No. PA03-0726, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0726 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA03-0726 on April 21, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA03-0726 subject to the conditions of approval after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA03-0726 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA03-0726 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Community Commercial) designation as well as the standards within the Development within the Development Coda. The proposed project is not within 500 feet of a public park, religious institution or school B. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide additional convenience for the community and allow the business to be competitive with other businesses selling beer and wine. C. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the project will provide an additional convenience to the community, which will reduce vehicle trips and the site consistent with the city policies R:M1 C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp\Draft PC Reso w- conditionsAoc regarding separation of sensitive uses. In addition, the City Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has issued conditions for approval. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0726 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities, Class 1). The proposed project will not add square footage to an existing commercial building, located at 29676 Rancho California Rd. (APN: 921-320- 053). Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request for a Minor Conditional Use Permit allow the sales of beer and wine (Type 20 license) in an existing Target building., attached hereto on Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on this 21" day of April 2004. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that, PC Resolution No. 2004-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21" day of April 2004, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:W C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp\Draft PC Reso w- conditions.do2 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RAM C U P0003\03-0726 Target Corp\Draft PC Rm w- conditions.dm 3 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0726 Project Description: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale of beer and wine (Type 20 license) in an existing commercial Target building, located at 29676 Rancho California Rd. (APN: 921-320-053) Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-320-053 Approval Date: April 21, 2004 Expiration Date: April 21, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty -Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicanUdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant shall comply with the statement of operations (attached) dated December 15, 2003, for PA03-0726 on file with the Planning Division, unless superceded by these Conditions of Approval. 3. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 5. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 6. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Cotp\Dnft PC Reso w- conditions.da 4 7. Prior to the commencement of any alcohol sales, the applicant shall submit verification the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control has issued the necessary Type 20 license (beer and wine permits). POLICE DEPARTMENT 8. The Temecula Police Department concurs with the hours of operation for the store facility. However, if any recurring problems should occur where the need for police response is needed due to the current hours of operations, or for any other reasons, the Temecula Police Department, at it's discretion, reserve the right to approach the City's Planning Commission and request the hours of operation be amended. 9. No distilled spirits may be on the premises at any time. 10. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association 1127-11tt' Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program. 11. Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department. 12. Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest procedures, personal safety, business security or any other related crime prevention training procedures are also available through the crime prevention unit. 13. Any business that serves or sell any alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business location where alcohol will be serviced for a fee and the event is open to the general public. 14. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business -advising customers of the "Inkless Ink program in use". If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above -mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature Date RAM C U A2003\03-0726 Target Corp\Dmft PC Reno w- conditions.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 STATEMENT OF OPERATION R: W C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp\STAFF REPORT-1 dw 260 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1001 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 TEL: 415.362.1215 FAX: 415.362.1494 December 15, 2003 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Knute Nowland Senior Planner Planning Department City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Re: Application for Conditional Use Permit/Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity Target Corporation, dba Target, 29676 Rancho California Rd., Temecula 92591 Dear Mr. Nowland Enclosed is Target Corporation's application for a conditional use permit to add package sales of alcoholic beverages to its existing store operations at 29676 Rancho California Road, in Temecula. Because the store is located in a census tract that has an "undue concentration" of off -sale licenses under Section.23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code, Target is also requesting a determination that public convenience and necessity will be served by issuance of the license. The following is an explanation of Target's intended operations. Target Corporation has applied to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for a Type 20 off -sale beer and wine license. While the license applied for permits sales of beer and wine, Target will begin initial operations with sales of wine only, perhaps adding beer at a later date. The wine will be displayed in the grocery section of the store, along with the other food and beverage products that Target sells. The operations of the store will remain essentially the same as they are now, without the sale of alcoholic beverages. The hours of operation, types of vehicular traffic, number of people involved (both as employees and as customers), outdoor activities and other operational aspects of the store will be unchanged. Alcoholic beverage sales will account for a small part of overall sales revenues at the store. Target projects that sales of alcoholic beverages will account for approximately 3-5% of sales at the licensed premises. Target plans to offer consumers an assortment of moderately priced wines, including wines from Northern California vineyards. Adding wine sales will provide a convenience to Target's customers by eliminating the need for an additional shopping trip. Target also plans to offer customers the opportunity to learn about the wines that Target sells through educational events, led by professionals and wine industry members. Knute Nowland Senior Planner December 15, 2003 Page 2 If you have questions about Target's proposed operations or need any additional documentation, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, SA lw Beth Aboulafia Encl. Mr. Hogan also relayed that for City -owned trails, proper maintenance would include: regular inspections, repairs and resurfacing as needed, weed control, safety signage, and stripping (if hard surfaced); that when the City trail facilities are constructed in easement areas, City liability for the trail is still covered through the General Plan Liability Policy; however, non -trail related liability will still remain the responsibility of the underlying property owners. Mr. Hogan further clarified that the proposed project is designed for large parcels; that it is a voluntary policy; that it would not apply to a person who would desire to build a home on their own lot; and that it would only apply if one were to have subdivisions of land. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Larry Markham, 41045 Enterprise Circle relayed that he is in favor of the project and noted that the proposed project would cut the density in half for the vast majority of the area with the exception of the parcels that are immediately adjacent to Ynez; and that it would allow flexibility on how to site the parcels with regard to clustering. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. It was the consensus of the Commission to combine Item No. 5 and 7. 5 Public Necessity and Convenience Findings 29676 Rancho California Road, Target Retail Building RECOMMENDATION 5.1 Approve Findings of Public Convenience Per the request of Commissioner Guerriero, Item No. 7 will be reviewed after Item No. 5 7 Associate Planner Long presented a staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: • That the proposed project is for a minor CUP that includes the Public Necessity and Findings for Target to sell beer and wine on site; • That the separation of criteria in the Development Code requires 500 feet separation from any schools, parks, hospitals, or religious institution; • That staff was able to make the findings and recommends the approval for a minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as well as the findings for convenience; RAM1nutesPC\042104 • That at this time, Target does not sell any alcohol or liquor; and that this is its first proposal. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Ms. Beth Aboulafia, 260 Calitornia Street, representing Target, relayed the following: • That Target started selling wine at its stores in California two years ago; • That currently there are 40 stores in Northern California that are licenses and have been selling wine; • That due to its success, Target started expanding the program to its stores in Southern California; • That Target has not had any problems or violations with selling to minors at any of the stores that have already been licensed in California; • That the application is for a Type 20 off site beer and wine license; • That there will be no consumption on the premises; • That although its a beer and wine license, Target will only be selling wine; • That all Target Stores have only been selling wine; • That the sales of wine will only represent 3% of sales; but that it would be a complement to the food and beverage products that Target currently has in its market section and will be a convenience to Target's customers; • That Target employees will be provided a training program relating to alcohol and beverage sales that is specific to the laws and regulations to California; • That there have been no objections from the few neighboring residents; • That there have been no objections from the Police Department; • That wine bottles will be located in the market section of Target; At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Guerriero is of the opinion that there is no need or convenience to approve a Type 20 beer and wine license. For Commissioner Olhasso, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that currently there are no plans for redevelopment in the Target Center. Commissioner Mathewson expressed concern with approving another license for beer and wine sales in the area. R:VAnutesPC\042104 4 For Commissioner Mathewson, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that when the state turned the jurisdiction over to the Cities, they did not give any criteria; and that the City Attorney developed the criteria for staff that is fairly consistent with other jurisdictions across the state. Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with denying the proposed item stating that the census tract boundary is arbitrary and that if the City is going to allow establishments to sell alcohol in commercial zones (which is established in the zoning ordinance), that the City should be consistent and; therefore, either allow more establishments to sell alcohol, or that if the Commission is of the opinion that there is over -concentration of Type 20 licenses, then the zoning ordinance should be changed; and that it would be inequitable to allow some stores to sell and others to not sell. Chairman Telesio is of the opinion that staff should be reviewing the zoning ordinance; that he finds it difficult to approve these findings of convenience for large box type stores and deny sales to smaller outlets. For the Commission, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that changing the zoning ordinance to not permit alcohol sales in commercial zones would be a huge detriment to economic development. Assistant City Attorney Curly relayed that the Commission has the ability on each discretionary land use decision to look at the specific criteria. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the findings of Public Convenience. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion voice vote reflected denial with the exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted yes. / MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to deny PC Resolution No. 2002-019 due to the fact that the nature of the proposed use is detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community because the census tract is over -saturated with liquor licenses at this time. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected denial of Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with the exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted No. Commissioner Chiniaeff requested that staff have the City Council evaluate their commercial uses as related to alcohol permits. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PA NO. 03-0726, A REQUEST FOR MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TYPE 20 (OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOL LICENSE FOR TARGET LOCATED AT 29676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-320-053. RAM1nutesPC\042104 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 EXHIBITS (Aerial Map, 500' Separation radius, Census Map) RAM C U P\2003\03-0726 Target Corp= Staff Report-1.doc 6 City of Temecula PA03-0726 i arget, muur + w \A ' PARK «xv 1 N 4 1 { t ,;� r ,r•-pry � �-i , Pt as ,wA,; ARAW CHURCHit Highways Streets Parcels Parks city NhUNar.NrmNRML 00Ti6 a. j" T 8ma4we =m byftcydTxrerrVaG NmpN IdpmetipbYUR. T &GmtEeAwdhartibasetlaU / \ pmCuo+dgmo WleisJn Coimty�/seepaMed N NIM1e Tn�npplgpm and Lvtl ll�nAa'���A9� Y . 200 0 200 400 Feet ThCtyd TmA. wm"Wftsrry NyvftdmmA ThG.W*c mmSymmaredaeqme mq� m ` rtaA oaredldan�etian. Rl411Wp I8fpt b'IC�II�y1B888. City of Temecula PA03-0726 Highways ---- Streets pmJimtlbyNreRna®bCaaM1yAc�esm/slkpaMreM arA W T�aepaletian sM �ltleregeneMMJawY Parcels N 200 0 200 400 Feet aw.rereyQle�respmslhr aaamnaummnwred 0 Parks A omsmap. omeemi amaam qew mamVsmp /� ages are amjaCrowdab as mod�re�im. me ceoaawwa City _ Infannetim Syemmmd oba srem Yvdtl be 9usiretl brtle moss wrereiNam¢tlun. ihsmapismf brrepiMa resale ABC Licenses in Census 0432.16 ABC Licenses in Census 0432.16 20 Off Site Sale of Beer and Wine (9) 21 Off Site Sale of Beer, Wine and Distilled Spirits (4) 41 On Site Sale of Beer and Wine - Restaurant (26) • 47 On Site Sale of Beer, Wine and Distilled Spirits -Restaurant (16) Highways Centerline Parcels Parks 0 Public Facilities 600 0 600 1200 Feet 0 Public Safety Facilities O Schools 0 City This map vies made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessors Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty a legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic a Information System and other sources should be queried for the Amost current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. Map prepared November 12, 2004. ragis\kellilarcviewpmjects1abc_census_0432.apr ATTACHMENT NO. 5 APPEAL APPLICATION AND CORRPESONDENCE FROM APPLICANT RAM C U Pt2003\03-0726 Target Corp\CC Staff Report-1.doc 7 City of Temecula D." SL�p Community Development Department 43200 Business Park Drive • Temecula • CA • 92590 P.O. Box 9033, Temecula • CA • 92589-9033 (909) 694-6400 • FAX (909) 694-6477 Original Case Number(s) ECENE� v r l r• 2004 The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or dissatisfied with an action taken by an administrative agency of the City in the administration or enforcement of any provisions of the Development Code. L-Malplacso• 11: ul ♦Y 1. Development Application. 2. Appeal Form. 3. Filing Fee. ► MY Lei wo]Niffin M •11/1 WWIulYl A notice of an appeal by any individual who is aggrieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by him or in his behalf, or with any action, order, requirement, decision or determination shall not be acted upon unless filed within fifteen (15) calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. Appealing the decision �o�iy�ss%s1/ (Specify Director of Planning or Planning Commission AND Action Date) Specify exactly what is being appealed: do-s')' / lloell-tl R:\rAGAtU UPUC\APP.APP 7/16/97 k 1 Reason or justification to support the appeal. Appellant must submit with this appeal each issue which the appellant alleges was wrongly determined together with every agreement and a copy of every item of evidence. (Attach separate sheet of paper if necessary). X Desired action to be taken: In the event any Notice of Appeal applicant fails to answer any information set forth above, then the request will be returned to the appellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant shall be allowed five 5 calendar days in which to refile the notice of appeal. A:VAGAM6"FUCU P.APP 9/16/97 t 260 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1001 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 TEL: 415.362.1215 FAX: 415.362A494 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS May 5, 2004 Dan Long Associate Planner Planning Department City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 92589-9033 III MAY 0 6 2004 I -UNMAN & CAP,MIC JADE LLP Re: Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of Planning Application No. PA03-0726 and Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity Dear Mr. Long, Please be advised that Target Corporation wishes to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to deny Planning Application No. PA03-0726 and a finding of public convenience or necessity to allow the sale beer and wine for off -site consumption at the Target store in Temecula to the City Council. A check in the amount of $351 for the appeal fee is enclosed. Target Corporation applied for a Minor Conditional Use Permit to add sales of beer and wine for off -site consumption to its existing store operations at 29676 Rancho California Road, in Temecula. Because the Target store is located in a census tract that is defined as "overconcentrated" with off -sale licenses under California Business and Professions Code § 23958.4, a finding of public convenience or necessity was also required from the Planning Commission. Both applications were denied by the Planning Commission by a vote of 4-1. Target believes the Planning Commission's decision was arbitrary and inconsistent with the city's General Plan and Development Code. The Commission denied Target's application, not based on any considerations or concerns regarding Target's business operations, but because the census tract in which the Target store is located is "overconcentrated." Target believes that an analysis based solely on census tract statistics is arbitrary and conflicts with the city's own General Plan. Moreover, the Commission has, in the past, regularly approved applications for markets and other large -box stores like Target, notwithstanding overconcentration. In that regard, the Commission acted inconsistently in denying Target's application. Because a fuller discussion of these issues may be helpful in evaluating Target's appeal, Target plans to submit a supplemental letter in support of its appeal next week. We understand that the City Council's procedures require that Planning Commission appeals be heard within 30 days, and we have no objection to extending the time for the appeal to be heard by the City Council. Dan Long Associate Planner May 5, 2004 Page 2 If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Beth Aboulafia Encl. 260 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1001 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 TEL: 415.362.1215 FAX 415.362.1494 BY MAIL AND FACSIMILE October 11, 2004 Dan Long Associate Planner Planning Department City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 92589-9033 T� U OCT 14 2111 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of Planning Application No. PA03-0726 and Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity Dear Mr. Long, This letter is written in support of Target's appeal. Target Corporation applied for a Minor Conditional Use Permit to add sales of beer and wine for off -premise consumption to its existing store operations at 29676 Rancho California Road, in Temecula. Because the Target store is located in a census tract that is defined as "overconcentrated" with off -sale licenses under California Business and Professions Code § 23958.4, a finding of public convenience or necessity was also required from the Planning Commission. Both applications were denied by the Planning Commission by a vote of 4-1. The Commission denied Target's application, not based on any considerations or concerns regarding Target's business operations, but because the census tract in which the Target store is located is "overconcentrated.nl Under California Business and Professions Code § 23958.4, there are 5 off -sale licenses 'allowed' for census tract 432.16 and 12 licenses existing. Some general observations about these numbers may be helpful in evaluating Target's appeal. First, the term 'allowable' licenses is perhaps misleading. It does not mean that additional licensed establishments are prohibited, or even discouraged; it simply means that the local jurisdiction has the ability to review any additional license applications to determine whether they are consistent with the city's general plan and with its business and development objectives. If so, the city may approve the application by making the required finding of public convenience or necessity. 1 The Planning Department staff, in recommending approval of the application, determined that the proposed use was consistent with the General Plan (community commercial) and zoning (community commercial designation), and with the standards in the City's Development Code. These determinations were undisputed by the Commission. A Dan Long Associate Planner October 11, 2004 Page 2 Second, the number of 'allowable' licenses is determined by population. What this means is that in census tracts that are primarily residential, a high number of licenses are allowed and in commercial areas, fewer licenses are allowed. This runs counter to the city's zoning plan, which seeks to locate alcohol -licensed businesses — indeed, most businesses — in centralized commercial areas. The Target census tract, CT 432.16, includes the highest density commercial area in the city of Temecula (north of Rancho California Rd., east of Highway 15 and south of Winchester Blvd.). It is no wonder then that there is a high concentration of off -sale alcohol licenses in this census tract. It is precisely where the city wants them to be. Indeed, of the eleven census tracts in the city of Temecula, the only other census tracts that are "overconcentrated" with off -sale licenses, based on statistics from the ABC, are CT 432.15 and CT 432.10, which together account for the rest of the city's central commercial area (along the west side of Highway 15 and the north side of Winchester Blvd east of Highway 15). Thus, if Target, or any other business owner, wanted to locate an off -sale alcohol establishment anywhere in the city except these designated commercial areas, it would be 'allowed' under the ABC's regulation, but likely disallowed by the city's zoning ordinances. It was apparent at the hearing that there was no consensus among the Commissioners on how to deal with the issue of "overconcentration." One Commissioner, recognizing the inconsistency between the ABC's census tract analysis and the City's commercial zoning plan, voted to approve Target's application. The other Commissioners voted to deny the application, although each for different reasons. One Commissioner voted to deny Target's application not because he was concerned about overconcentration — he announced that he "didn't care" about census tracts or proliferation of licenses — but because he perceived that the Commission had been acting discriminatorily in approving license applications for large markets and box stores, while denying them for "mom and pops." Just last month, however, the Planning Commission approved a finding of public convenience or necessity Winco Foods, another large chain store. Another Commissioner took view that the issue was solely a matter of the numbers, that is, if the census tract was "overconcentrated" under the ABC statistics, no new licenses should be approved, regardless of the nature of the business. The Commission, however, has not held consistently to this position either. Since Target's application was heard in April, the Planning Commission has approved findings of public` convenience or necessity for at least three other businesses allowing them to obtain alcohol licenses in overconcentrated census tracts. In fact, of the six applications for findings of public convenience or necessity that have come before the Planning Commission this year, Target's application is the only one that was denied. In short, the Planning Commission does not appear to have, or be applying, a consistent policy in dealing with the issue of "overconcentration." Dan Long Associate Planner October 11, 2004 Page 3 In light of the above, and the information originally submitted to the Planning Commission, Target asks the City Council to reconsider the Commission's decision and approve Target's application for a conditional use permit and finding of public convenience or necessity to add beer and wine sales to its existing retail operations. Sincerely, �5A- Abu Beth Aboulafia ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIN N CITY MANAGER f CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/Cit�ouncil FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, ire r of Planning DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Rancho Temecula Town Center, PA02-0360 General Plan Amendment; PA02- 0363 Specific Plan Amendment; PA02-0364 Development Plan; PA02-0365 Tentative Parcel Map; PA04-0540 Conditional Use Permit PREPARED BY: Dan Long, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the following Ordinance and Resolutions. 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, FOR THE RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02- 0360, 02-0363, 02-0364, 02-0365 AND 04-0540). 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) ON 20.2 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, AND GENERALLY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 920-100- 001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02-0360). R1D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 1 3. Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 04- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN FROM NEIBHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) AND REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING AREA 9, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION PA02- 0363) 4. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30719, TO SUBDIVIDE 20.2 ACRES INTO 12 PARCELS, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02- 0365) 5. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0364, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 162,860 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE, INCLUDING THREE MAJOR TENANTS, SEVEN PADS AND A TOTAL OF FOUR DRIVE THROUGH FACILITIES, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, KNOWN AS APN: 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 6. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0540, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING A R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Staff Report-1.doc 2 TOTAL OF FOUR DRIVE -THROUGH FACILITIES WITHIN A RELATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA02-0364) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 162,860 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL SPACE, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NUMBERS 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013. BACKGROUND: This project went before the Planning Commission on October 20, 2004. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 recommending the City Council approved the project and adopt a Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. The applications consist of the following: • General Plan Amendment: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC) • Specific Plan Amendment: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC) for Planning Area 9 • Tentative Parcel Map: Subdivide 20.2 acres into 12 lots • Development Plan: Approximately 162,860 square feet of commercial retail space • Conditional Use Permit: Allows a total of 4 drive -through facilities DISCUSSION: STAFF ANALYSIS Staff forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission based on the following analysis: General Plan Amendment The proposed land use change from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC) is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives in the General Plan. The General Plan refers to projects greater than 10 acres and greater than 10,000 square feet as appropriate for Community Commercial centers. In addition, the project site is located on a State Highway, which warrants a Community Commercial center rather than a smaller scale Neighborhood Commercial center. Specific Plan Amendment The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is a request to change the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC) and to include design guidelines and development standards for Planning Area 9. This request, if granted, RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 3 would bring the Specific Plan in conformance with the Land Use designation of the related General Plan Amendment. Tentative Parcel Mai) The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is a request to subdivide 20.2 acres into 12 lots. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is in conformance with the related General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments, and the Subdivision Ordinance. Development Plan The proposed Development Plan is a request to construct approximately 162, 860 square feet of commercial retail space. The project includes 3 anchor tenants, inline shops and seven pads. Two of the seven pads (Pads K and L) are required to go back before the Planning Commission for approval of the architectural design, the other five pads are subject to Administrative approval. The proposed project is consistent with the related General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments. Conditions of Approval were included, such as the requirement for the architecture of Major E (L.A. Fitness) to blend with the overall center and Major H (corner drug store) to include four-sided architecture. Additional Conditions were added to enhance the landscaping and screening of the drive -through facilities. Conditional Use Permit The proposed Conditional Use Permit is required for the drive -through facilities. A total of four drive -through facilities are proposed; two are anticipated as fast food type restaurants (Pads K and L), a potential bank (Pad J) and a prescription drug drop-off and pick-up (Major H). Conditions of Approval are in place requiring screening of the drive -through windows with trellis features and landscape berming. Environmental Review An initial study was prepared and staff determined that the potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to a less than significant level on the environment. The Conditions of Approval are in place and a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared for the project. Therefore, adoption of a Mitigated Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program is recommended. PLANNING COMMISSION ANALYSIS The Planning Commission agreed with staff's recommendation of approval. The Planning Commission discussion revolved around the architecture, drive -through facilities, loading areas, Major H (drug store at the corner), the monument at the Winchester Road and Nicolas Road intersection, rear of buildings and landscaping. The Planning Commission added various conditions of approval in regards to architecture and site layout. The Planning Commission voted 5-0, approving the project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 04-_ Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation monitoring Program Exhibit A — Initial study and Mitigation Monitoring Program RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 4 3. Ordinance No. 04-_ Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit A — Specific Plan Amendment 4. Resolution No. 04-_ Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval 5. Resolution No. 04- Development Plan Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval 6. Resolution No. 04-_ Conditional Use Permit Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval 7. Planning Commission Staff Report (October 20, 2004) 8. Excerpt from Draft Planning Commission Minutes (October 20, 2004) 9. Plan Reductions 10. Public comments and staff response to project and initial study RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 04- NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Staff Report-1.doc 6 RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02- 0360, 02-0363, 02-0364, 02-0365 AND 04-0540). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Pacific Development Partners, LLC filed Planning Application No. PA02-0360 General Plan Amendment; PA02-0363 Specific Plan Amendment; PA02-0365 Tentative Parcel Map; PA02-0364 Development Plan; and PA04-0540 Conditional Use Permit, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code and an initial study was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines; and, B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by the California Environmental Quality Act; and, C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on October 20, 2004 to consider the application of the Project and environmental review, at which time the City staff and interested persons has an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; and, D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-056, recommending the City Council approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. E. On , 2004 and 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. F. On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 04-_; Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an initial study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project could have a significant effect on the RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Final PC Peso Mitigated Neg Dec.doc 5 environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. A copy of the Initial Study, Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law and copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Planning Department, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92589. C. The City Council reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration were discussed at a public hearing of the City Council held on 2004. D. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA. E. There is no substantial evidence that the Project, as conditioned, will have a significant effect on the environment. F. The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. G. The Mitigation Monitoring Program set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with law. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project and approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this_, day of , 2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Jones, CIVIC, City Clerk SEAL] RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town CenterTinal PC Reso Mitigated Neg Dec.doc 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 2004 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Centeffinal PC Reso Mitigated Neg Dec.doc 7 EXHIBIT A INITIAL STUDY NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM 4 Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit October 20, 2004 Dan Long City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 fll OCT 2 5 2004 I Jan Boel Acting Director Subject: Planning Application Nos. PA02-0362 a General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Amendment and PA02-0364 is a Conditional Use PemutlDevelopment Plan SCH#: 2004091110 Dear Dan Long: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. The review period closed on October 19, 2004, and no state agencies submitted comments by that date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents,.pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above -named project, please refer to the ten -digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sincerely, Terry Roberts Director, State Clearinghouse 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 TEL (916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 w .opr.aa.gov City of Temecula artment SCH # 2004091110 Notice of Project Title: Planning Applications Nos. PA02-0360 a General Plan Amendment; PA02- Contact Person: Dan Long 0363, Specific Plan Amendment; PA02-0364 Development Plan, PA02-0365 Tentative Title: Associate Planner Parcel Map and PA04-0540 Conditional Use Permit Lead Agency: City of Temecula Phone: (951) 694-6400 Street Address: 43200 Business Park Drive City: Temecula, CA Zip: 92590 Project Location Within 2 miles City of Temecula, Riverside County State Hwy #: Interstate 15, Highway 79 Cross Streets: Southeast corner of Highway Airports: French Valley 79 South (Winchester Road) and Nicolas Waterways: Santa Gertruidis Creek Road Railways: None Schools: Chaparral High School Assessor's Parcel No.: 920-100-001through 13 Total Acres: 20.2 CEQA Document Type [ ]NOP [X]Negative Declaration [ ]Supplement EIR [ ]EIR (Prior SCH #) [ ]Early Consultation [ ]Draft FIR [ ]Subsequent EIR [ ]Other Local Action Type [ ]General Plan Update [X]Specific Plan [ ]Rezone [X]General Plan Amendment [ ]Master Plan [ ]Prezone [ ]General Plan Element [ ]Planned Unit Development [X]Use Permits [ ]Community Plan [X]Site Plan/Plot Plan [ ]Subdivision of Land [ ]Annexation [ ]Redevelopment [ ]Coastal Permit [ ]City Development Project [ ]Other Development Type [ ]Residential: Units---_ Acres_ [ ]Water Facilities: Type MGD [ ]Office: Sq.ft._ Acres_ Employees_ [ ]Transportation Type [X]Commercial: Sq.ft. 162,860 Acres 20.2 Employees_ [ ]Mining: Mineral [ ]Industrial: Sq.ft._ Acres_ Employees_ [ ]Power: []Educational: [ ]Waste Treatment: [ ]Recreational: [ ]Hazardous Waste: Type Type Type []Other: Project Issues Discussed in Document [X]Aesthetic/Visual [ ]Flood Plain/Flooding [ ]Schools/Universities [ ] Water Quality [ ]Agricultural Land [ ]Forest Land/Fire Hazard [ ]Septic Systems [ ]Water supply/groundwater [X]Air Quality [X]Geologic/Seismic [ ]Sewer Capacity [ ]Wetland/Riparian [X]Archeological/Historical [ ]Minerals [ ]Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grad [ ]Wildlife [ ]Coastal Zone [X]Noise [ ]Solid Waste [ ]Growth Inducing [ ]Drainage/Absorption [ ]Population/Housing Balances[ ]Toxic/Hazardous [ ]Land Use [ ]Economic/Jobs [ ]Public Services/Facilities [X]Traffic/Circulation [ ]Cumulative Effects [ ]Fiscal [ ]Recreation/Parks [ ]Vegetation [ ]Other: Light & Glare Present Land Use: Vacant Current Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial General Plan Use: Neighborhood Commercial Project Description: The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment text and map), Tentative Parcel Map, Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit. The General Plan R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\NOTICE OF COMPLETION.doc 1 Amendment is a request to amend the land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC). The Specific Plan Amendment is a request to amend the land use designation in Planning Area 9 of the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC). the Tentative Parcel Map is a request to subdivide 20.2 acres into 12 individual parcels. The conditional use permit and development plan application are a request to construct 162,860 square feet of commercial and retail space on 20.2 acres. Potential uses include an LA Fitness (45,000 square feet), Henry's Market (26,680 square feet) and a drug store (16,800 square feet) with a drive -up window for prescriptions. In addition, there are 7 pad buildings (3 with drive though windows), an outdoor food court and in -line retail shops. The CC Zone permits similar uses as the NC Zone; however the CC zone is not as restricted as the NC Zone in regard to floor area, size of lot and maximum square footage of any one user. Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 445-0613 R:\O F0002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Centet\NOTICE OF COMPLETION.doc 2 REVIEWING AGENCIES CHECKLIST Resources Agency Boating/Waterways _ Coastal Commission Coastal Conservancy _ Colorado River Board _ Conservation T Fish and Game Forestry _ Office of Historic Preservation _ Parks and Recreation _ Reclamation S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Commission Water Resources (DWR) Business, Transportation, & Housing Aeronautics T California Highway Patrol T Caltrans District No. 8 T Department of Transportation Planning (Headquarters) Housing & Community Development State & Consumer Services General Services T OLA (Schools) Public Review Period (to be filled in by lead agency) KEY S=Document sent by lead agency X=Document sent by SCH T=Suggested distribution Environmental Affairs Air Resources Board T APCD/AQMD California Waste Management Board _ SWRCB: Clean Water Grants _ SWRCB: Delta Unit T SWRCB: Water Quality SWRCB: Water Rights T Regional WQCB # 9 ( ) Youth & Adult Corrections Corrections Independent Commissions & Offices Energy Commission T Native American Heritage Commission _ Public Utilities Commission _ Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy _ State Land Commission Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Food & Agriculture Health & Welfare T Health Services Starting Date: September 20, 2004 Ending Date October 20, 2004 Signature Date September 17, 2004 Lead Agency (Complete if Applicable): City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: Dan Long Phone (951) 694-6400 Applicant Pacific Development Partners, LLS Address 30220 Rancho Viejo Rd. Suite B San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Phone (949) 481-0463 For SCH Use Only: Date Received at SCH Date Review Starts Date to Agencies Date to SCH Clearance Date Notes: R:M P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\NOTICE OF COMPLETIONAM 3 City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: PA02-0360 PA02-0363 PA02-0364 PA02-0365 PA04-0540 General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Amendment Development Plan Tentative Parcel Map Conditional Use Permit APPLICANT: Pacific Development Partners, LLC 30220 Rancho Viejo Rd., Ste. B, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway 79 North (Winchester Rd.) and Nicolas Rd., Assessor's Parcel Numbers 920-100-001-13. DESCRIPTION: PA02-0360 and PA02-0363 General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Amendment: The General Plan Amendment is a proposal to change the General Plan designation from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC). The Specific Plan Amendment is a proposal to amend the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan land use designation for Planning Area 9 from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial. PA02-0364 and PA04-0540 proposes a conditional use permit and development plan to construct 162,860 square feet of commercial and retail space on 20.2 acres. Potential uses include an LA Fitness (45,000 square feet), Henry's Market (26,680 square feet), and a drug store (16,800 square feet) with a drive -up window for prescriptions. The project also proposes 7 pad shops (3 drive-throughs), a food court and additional in -line retail area. PA02-0365 Proposes a Tentative Parcel map to subdivide 20.2 acres into 12 Darcels. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission intends to recommend the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design, conditions of approval and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached to this notice will be included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The Comment Period for this proposed Negative Declaration is September 20, 2004 to October 20, 2004. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033. City Hall is located at 43200 Business Park Drive. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: RAD M2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Noke of Intent -Rancho Center.doc X The Local Newspaper. X Posting the Site. X Notice to Adjacent Property Owners. If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact (Name and Title) at (951) 694-6400. Prepared by: Dan Long, Associate Planner. (Signature) (Name and Title) R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Notice of Intent -Rancho Center.doc 2 Vicinity Map RAD P\2002%02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Notice of Intent -Rancho Center.doc 3 City of Temecula Planning Department Agency Distribution List PROJECT: Planning Application No. PA02-0364 Development Plan Planning Application No. PA02-0362 General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Amendment DISTRIBUTION DATE: September 5, 2004 CITY OF TEMECULA: Building & Safety ..................................... (X) Fire Department ...................................... (X) Police Department .................................. ( ) Parks & Recreation (TCSD) .................... (X) Planning, Advance .................................. ( ) Public Works...........................................(X) STATE: Caltrans................................................... (X) Fish & Game ........................................... (X) Mines & Geology ..................................... ( ) Regional Water Quality Control Bd ......... (X) State Clearinghouse ............................... (X) State Clearinghouse (15 Copies)............ (X) Water Resources .................................... (X) FEDERAL: Army Corps of Engineers ............ I........... (X) Fish and Wildlife Service ......................... (X) REGIONAL: Air Quality Management District .............. (X) RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Notice of Intent -Rancho Center.doc 4 CASE PLANNER: Dan Long Western Riverside COG ......................... CITY OF MURRIETA: Planning................................................... RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Clerk and Recorder's Office .................... (X) Airport Land Use Commission ................ (X) Engineer..................................................( ) Flood Control .......................................... (X) Health Department ................................. (X) Parks and Recreation .............................. ( ) Planning Department ...............................( ) Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) . (X) Riverside Transit Agency ........................ (X) UTILITY: Eastern Municipal Water District ............. (X) Inland Valley Cablevision ........................ (X) Rancho CA Water District, Will Serve .... (X) Southern California Gas ......................... (X) Southern California Edison ..................... (X) Temecula Valley School District ............. (X) Metropolitan Water District ..................... (X) OTHER: Pechanga Indian Reservation ................. (X) Eastern Information Center ..................... (X) Local Agency Formation Comm .............. ( ) RCTC..................................................... ( ) Homeowners' Association .......................... ( ) RAD P12002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Notice of Intent -Rancho Center.doc 5 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Rancho Temecula Town Center Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Dan Long, Associate Planner 951 694-6400 Project Location Southeast corner of Highway 79 North (Winchester Rd.) and Nicolas Rd. Project Sponsor's Name and Address Pacific Development Partners, LLC., 30220 Rancho Viejo Rd., Ste. B, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 General Plan Designation Currently Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Pro osed Community Commercial CC Zoning Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan, Planning Area 9: Currently Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Proposed Community Commercial CC Description of Project The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment (text and map), Tentative Parcel Map (Map 30719) Conditional Use Permit and a Development Plan. The General Plan Amendment is a request to amend the land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC). The Specific Plan Amendment is a request to amend the land use designation in Planning Area 9 of the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC). The Tentative Parcel Map is a request to subdivide 20.2 acres into 12 parcels. The conditional use permit and development plan application is a request to construct 162,860 square feet of commercial and retail space on 20.2 acres. Potential uses include an LA Fitness (45,000 square feet), Henry's Market (26,680 square feet) and a drug store (16,800 square feet) with a drive -up window for prescriptions. In addition, there are 7 pad buildings (3 with drive though windows), an outdoor food court and in -line retail shops. The CC Zone permits similar uses as the NC Zone, however the CC zone is not as restricted as the NC Zone in regard to floor area, size of lot and maximum square footage of any one user. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Surrounding land uses include Santa Gertrudis Creek to the north, a self -storage facility and vacant land to the east, Nicolas Rd and a gas station (AM/PM) to the south, and Highway 79 North (Winchester Rd.) and a senior housing development to the west. In addition, there is a High School (Chaparral High School) located to the southwest. Other public agencies whose approval Other public agencies which may require approval and/or is required subsequent permits include: U.S Army Corps (USACE), Cal Trans, Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the County of Riverside Airport Land Use Commission ALUC . RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture Resources X Noise X Air Quality Po ulation and Housing Biological Resources Public Services X Cultural Resources Recreation X Geology and Soils X Trans ortation/Traffic Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems Hydrology and Water Quality X Mandatory Findings of Significance Land Use and Planning None Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not X be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the Droiect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Dan Long, Associate Planner Printed name Date For RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 2 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not X limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings rd.a. within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X uali of the site and its surroundings? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: 1. a.-c: No Impact: The proposed project is not located on or near a scenic vista, therefore, there will not be an adverse impact on a scenic vista. The project site is not located on a scenic highway. The project site is currently vacant with no structures, trees or rock outcroppings on the site. Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including trees, rock outcroppings or historic buildings. Due to the fact that the project site is vacant with no scenic vistas or resources, the project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 1. d.: Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is currently vacant with no sources of light or glare. The proposed project will introduce new generators of light and glare typically associated with retail commercial development. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Riverside County Mount Palomar Ordinance 655. Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Decorative lighting is allowed, however it will be required to be shut-off by 11:00 P.M. Mitigation Measures include the following: a. Comply with Riverside County Mount Palomar Ordinance 655. All lighting shall be fully shielded, directed down and parking lot lighting shall be low-pressure sodium. Decorative lighting shall be shut- off by 11:00 P.M. b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a photometric plan detailing the proposed light levels for the entire project site and onto adjacent project boundaries. c. The applicant shall comply with the City of Temecula Development Code and Design Guidelines for General Commercial lighting standards, which require minimum and maximum lighting levels in parking lot areas, loading areas, pedestrian circulation areas, primary building entries and lighting at project boundaries. R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-t.doc 3 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: 2. a.-c.: No Impact. The project site is not currently in agricultural production and in the recent and historic past the site has not been used for agricultural purposes. The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is it zoned for agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment, which would result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project R:\D P12002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 4 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X to an existing or projected air quality violation? C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- X attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? Comments: 3. a.: No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with the applicable air quality plan. The project site is comprised of 20.2 acres and encompasses the entire area of Planning Area 9 in the Specific Plan. The City of Temecula Final EIR for the General Plan takes into consideration the entire project site as commercial use. The primary difference between the land use designations are the size of buildings and size of any one particular user. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 3. b.: No Impact. The proposed project will not violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The proposed project will emit typical emissions and dust associated with commercial construction, however, the applicant will be required to comply with air emission standards as set forth below. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 3. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The proposed project is not considered a significant pollutant generator; however the prevailing winds can produce considerable dust and emissions into the air. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures outlined in the City of Temecula EIR and as specifically discussed below. 3. d.-e.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The proposed project could potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentration and could potentially create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The proposed project is located directly east of a future senior housing facility and an existing senior housing facility. Directly to the southwest is an existing four-year high school. Within a one -quarter of a mile to the southeast is a child day care. The following Mitigation Measures shall apply: a. The applicant shall submit a final URBEMIS 2002 air quality study which identifies air pollution levels during construction activities. Said study shall be prepared in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District. R1D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\lnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 5 b. The applicant shall construct bicycle lanes in the right-of-way as shown on the City's Master Trail plan and subject to the approval by the City of Temecula Community Services Department. c. The applicant shall provide a clear path with pedestrian signs to/from the San Gertrudis Creek trail to promote alternative transportation. d. The applicant shall coordinate with the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) to determine if a bus turn- out or other mass transit services are feasible for the project site. Written authorization shall be submitted to the City of Temecula. e. The applicant shall submit a final landscape plan for the project site incorporating native drought - resistant vegetation, mature trees. If more than 100 days elapses from the time grading is complete and beginning of construction, the City of Temecula may require temporary landscaping to reduce the amount of dust and prevent dust and erosion. f. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall verify that all earth moving and large equipment are properly tuned and maintained to reduce emissions. In addition, alternative clean - fueled vehicles shall be used where feasible. Construction equipment should be selected considering emission factors and energy efficiency. g. Electrical and/or diesel -powered equipment should be utilized in -lieu of gasoline -powered engines. During construction and grading phases, the project site shall be watered down in the morning before grading and/or construction begins and in the evening once construction and/or grading is complete for the day. The project site shall be watered down no less than 3 times (not including the morning and evening water -down) during construction and/or grading activities to reduce dust. i. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a watering program shall be submitted to the City of Temecula Planning Department for approval. Said program shall include control of wind-blown dust on site and on site access roadways. j. All fill being transported to and/or from the site shall be covered and the wheels and lower portion of transport trucks shall be sprayed with water to reduce/eliminate soil from the trucks before they leave the construction area. k. Prior to the issuance of a grading and building permit, the applicant shall submit verification that a ridesharing program for the construction crew has been encouraged and will be supported. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\lnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-t.doc 6 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Comments: 4. a.-f.: No Impact: The project site is void of any natural biological resources, including wetlands, riparian forests, vernal pools, and nursery sites. The project is not within a natural conservation plan or other local regional or state conservation plan, including area identified under the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The project site has been grubbed and disturbed for many years in order to comply with the City's weed abatement ordinance (Ord 8.16). In addition, the project site has been used for various activities such as Christmas tree lots, carnivals, pumpkin patches, fruit stands and other similar events. There are some grasses on the project site, however they are not considered sensitive habitat, nor is the site a part of a wildlife corridor. The project site is adjacent to Santa Gertrudis Creek and a Section 404 permit may be required subject to the approval of the Department of the Army. The applicant shall submit verification from the US Army Corps. (USACE) indicating if any permits are necessary. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Centerdnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-t.doc 7 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: 5. a.: No Impact: A Phase I survey (Historical/archaeological resource survey report, Rancho Temecula Town Center, CRM Tech, November 24, 2003) has been prepared for the proposed project. The survey did not identify any historical resources as defined in Section 15064.5 on the project site. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 5. b.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The above mentioned Phase I survey did not identify any archaeological resources nor did the historical records search identify the project site as a potential site for archaeological resources pursuant to Section 15064.5. However, the City of Temecula General Plan (Figure 5-6) identifies the project site as a sensitive archaeological resource area. The phase I study did not recommend any mitigation measures, however, the lead agency is recommending archaeological monitors during all grading and earth moving activities due to the adjacent Santa Gertrudis Creek.. 5. c.: No Impact: The City of Temecula Final EIR does not identify the project site as a potential site for paleontological resources. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 5. d.: No Impact: The phase I survey did not identify the project site as a potential site for historical resources, including human remains. No impacts are anticipated, however, mitigation monitoring, as required in 5.b. shall be required as part of the mitigation monitoring program. a. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant must enter into an agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians that addresses the treatment and disposition of all cultural resources, human resources and human remains discovered on -site. b. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including archaeological artifacts found on the project site, to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and disposition. c. The applicant shall provide an on -site archaeological and paleontological monitoring during all phases of earthmoving activities. d. If sacred sites are discovered during ground disturbing activities, they shall be avoided and preserved. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-7.doc 8 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial X adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on X the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv. Landslides? X Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X that would become unstable as a result of the project, rd.b. and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral, s readin subsidence, li uefaction or colla se? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B X of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: 6. a. i-iv: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures: A Geotechnical Investigation has been prepared for the proposed project (Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation, Rancho Temecula Town Center, Winchester & Nicolas Roads, Temecula, CA, Geocon Inc., June 17, 2003). The proposed project is located 3.1 miles from the Temecula segment of the Lake Elsinore Fault. The Lake Elsinore Fault is classified as an active fault and has the potential to produce large magnitude earthquakes (Geocon inc., June17, 2003). The project site has the potential for severe shaking in the event of a major earthquake on this or other nearby faults. The following mitigations measures shall be implemented: a. The applicant shall comply with all the recommendations within the Supplemental Geotechnical investigation, prepared by Geocon Inc., dated June 17, 2003. 6. b.: Less than Significant Impact. The project will not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. The project site is relatively flat will be developed in accordance with City standards, including National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards, which require the implementation of erosion control and best management practices (BMP's). The Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or mudslides located on the site or proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 6. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project is not located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. A geotechnical investigation has been prepared for the R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Centelllnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-i.doc 9 proposed project (Geocon, Inc., June 17, 2003) and has not identified any geologic unit or unstable soils that would become unstable. The project is required to comply with the recommendations in the investigation prepared by Geocon Inc., dated June 17, 2003. 6. d.: No Impact: The project is not located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property. The geotechnical investigation prepared by Geocon Inc., dated June 17, 2003 identifies the soils on the project site as "very low to low expansion potential as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) Table No. 18-1-B. The project is required to comply with the recommendations in the investigation report prepared by Geocon Inc., dated June 17, 2003. 6. e.: No Impact: The project site will not utilize septic tanks. A public sewer system is available and approvals from the Department of Environmental Health for solid wastes and waste water will be required. The project will connect to the public sewer system. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 10 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a.disposal a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through the routine transportation, use, or of hazardous materials? FCreate b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or X acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation Ian? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: 7. a.: No Impact: The project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed project consists of retail commercial uses and will not generate hazardous materials that would create a significant hazard. Typical transportation, use and disposal of wastes associated with commercial uses are anticipated, however these are not considered potentially significant. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7. b.: No Impact. The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The proposed project consists of general commercial uses. The releases of hazardous materials into the environment are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-t.doc 11 7. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located within one -quarter mile of an existing high school. However, the proposed project is not anticipated to emit substantial emissions, materials or wastes that would create a significant impact. The project is required to implement mitigation measures to reduce air quality emissions as required in the Air Quality analysis. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7. d.: No Impact: The project site is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, would not result in a significant hazard to the public or the environment. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 7. e.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The proposed project is located within the French Valley Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) has reviewed the proposed project. An approval letter dated July 22, 2004 has been submitted to the City and includes conditions of approval for the project. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval, which have been incorporated into the mitigation measures below. The applicant shall comply with the following mitigation measures: a. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval of the ALUC for file No FV-04-104, dated July 22, 2004. The following conditions of approval apply: 1. Provide avigation easements to the French Valley Airport prior to sale of any property to any entity exempt from the Subdivision Map Act, prior to recordation of any map, or issuance of any permit, whichever occurs first. 2. The notice, attached to the approval letter, dated July 22, 2004, shall be provided to each prospective buyer and/or tenant. 3. No obstruction of the "FAR Part 77 Conical Surface" shall be permitted. 4. Install hooded or shielded outdoor lighting to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the night sky (lights must directed downward). 5. The following uses shall be prohibited: i. Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following take off or toward an aircraft engaged in a final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA -approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. ii. Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport iii. Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract a large concentration of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. iv. Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to any operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. 6. No above ground storage of flammable materials shall be allowed. RID P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\lnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 12 7. f.: No Impact: The proposed project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 7. g.: No Impact. The proposed project is not located in an area and is not a portion of an emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore the project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7. h.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in or near a wildland area that would be subject to fire hazards. The location of the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No impact is anticipated as a result of this project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 13 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 8. a.: Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements because the proposed project is required to comply with Best Management Practices (BMP's), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations as well as National Pollution Elimination Discharge Elimination System standards. An Army Corps of Engineers permit may be required if the project proposes the inclusion of discharge or dredged or fill material into, including any redeposit of dredged materials within "waters of the United States" and adjacent wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972. The applicant is required to consult with the Department of the Army to determine the appropriate permits required, if any. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. b.: No Impact. The proposed project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 14 of the local groundwater table level. The proposed project is required to comply with local development standards, including lot coverage and landscaping requirements, which will allow percolation and ground water recharge. The nearest water wells are located along Margarita Road, north of the Santa Gertrudis and Winchester Road and along Nicolas Road, east of Leon Road. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 8. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. The proposed project will include an on -site drainage plan; however it will not alter off -site drainage patterns or alter the course of a stream or river, and will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on -or off -site. The project is also required to comply with Best Management Practices (BMP's), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations as well as National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPEDS) standards, which addresses drainage, siltation and erosion. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site because the project will not alter the course of a stream or river. The project is located adjacent to the San Gertrudis creek, however it will not result in flooding. The City of Temecula Public Works Department reviews all drainage plans and determines adequate drainage facilities are in place capable of on -site drainage and that off -site drainage facilities can accommodate additional flow. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 8. a.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The project is required to comply with Best Management Practices (BMP's), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations as well as National Pollution Elimination Discharge Elimination System standards, which address drainage and polluted runoff. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. f.: No Impact: The proposed project would not otherwise degrade water quality because the proposed project is not considered a significant pollutant generator and will not include excessive fertilizer application or other similar materials that could degrade water quality. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. g.: No Impact: The proposed project is not a residential project and therefore will not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 8. h.: Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is partially located within a 100 year flood boundary as shown in the Final EIR for the City of Temecula General Plan. The project will place structures within a 100-year flood hazard area, however they will be required comply with FEMA standards and will not impede or redirect flood flows. As a condition of approval a drainage plan is required; this plan will address flow and drainage facilities. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. i.: No Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. The proposed project is located in a Dam Inundation area for the Lake Skinner Dam. Said dam is a 43,800 acre-feet earthen dam located to the north east (approximately 15 miles) and a failure would result in the flooding of the Santa Gertrudis creek. In the event of a massive dam failure, there is a potential for structure loss, however this is considered a remote potential. Minor dam failure would not result in significant loss of structures or loss of life, injury or death on the project site. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. RAD P12002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 15 8. j.: No Impact. The proposed project is not located near a coast line which would be subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudf low. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-t.doc 16 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Ph sicall divide an established community? X b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Comments: 9. a.-c: No Impact. The proposed project is currently zoned commercial (Neighborhood Commercial, NC) and will not divide an established community or conflict with the applicable land use plan. The long term vision of the project is planned for commercial uses to provide services to the surrounding residential areas. The project is not subject to a habitat conservation plan or a natural community conservation plan. The Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) does not identify the project site as a critical site subject to additional studies or review. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\lnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-t.doc 17 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use Ian? Comments: 10. a.-b.: No Impact. The proposed project is not located in an area that is known to include minerals that are considered of value to the region and/or the state. The proposed project will not result in the loss of a locally - important mineral resource because the project site is not identified as an important site known to maintain such resources as shown in the Final EIR for the City of Temecula General Plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 18 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact incorporated Impact Impact a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X roundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without theproject? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: 11. a.-c, e. f..: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project consists of general retail uses such as restaurants and markets and is located on the northeast corner of Highway 79 South and Nicolas Road. The General Plan allows noise levels in commercial centers no greater than 70 CNEL. The City of Temecula General Plan and EIR have forecasted noise levels for this area to be within 70 CNEL. There may be temporary noise levels in excess of the maximum noise levels permitted in the General Plan during construction activities and during peak hour traffic periods. However this will be temporary in nature and is associated with typical commercial development. A final noise analysis is required in order to determine if special construction materials are required. Hours of operation for construction activities, consistent with the City's noise element in the General Plan will be enforced. The project is located near the French Valley Airport and is subject to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The ALUC has reviewed the proposed project and has determined it to be acceptable. A less than significant impact is associated due to noise levels from the airport. The French Valley Airport is a small scale airport and does not allow for large commercial jets. The airport is typically used as a small engine propeller recreation airport. There is not a private airstrip in the vicinity of the project that would potentially impact the project site. 11.d: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The General Plan noise element identifies the project site as an area that may include noise levels in excess of the maximum CNEL permitted in a commercial zone. A maximum noise level of 70 CNEL is permitted for commercial uses. The proposed project is located along Highway 79 North and may be subject to periodic noise levels that require noise attenuation measures. Buildings and outdoor dining areas along the highway may be subject to noise levels that require mitigation measures. The project shall be subject to the following Mitigation Measures: a. A final noise analysis shall be prepared verifying the type of construction materials required for all buildings and exterior dining areas in order to comply with the minimum noise attainment levels. R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 19 Said study shall address noise levels for interior and exterior areas, including outdoor dining areas. b. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one -quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday -Friday 6:30 a.m. — 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. — 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays RAD P\2002\02-0364 Rodpaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 20 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either X directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: 12. a.-c.: No Impact. The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project site is a commercial project and residential uses are not proposed. The project site is vacant and will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the site is developed within a commercial zone. The project will neither displace housing nor people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 21 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical X impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fireprotection? X Policeprotection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: 13. a.: Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The project will incrementally increase the need for some services. However, the project will contribute its fair share through City Development Impact Fees to be used to provide public facilities. The project will not have an impact upon, and will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City. The project will have a less than significant impact upon the need for new or altered public facilities. The Rancho California Water District and the Riverside Department of Environmental Health have been made aware of this project. A condition of approval has been placed on this project that will require the proponent to obtain 'Will Serve" letters from all of the public utilities agencies. Service is currently provided for the surrounding residential and commercial development, so extending service to this site is possible, which would result in less than significant impacts as a result of the project. RAO P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 22 14. RECREATION. Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Would the project increase the use of existing X neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require X the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: 14. a.: No Impact. The project is a commercial project in a commercial zone. The project will not displace recreationally zoned lands or remove vacant lands that are used for recreational purposes. The anticipated need to increase the neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities as a result of this project is not anticipated. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14. b.: No Impact. The proposed project does not include an open space or recreational aspect to the project. Furthermore, the project will not require the construction or expansion of additional recreational facilities. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 23 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in X relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of X service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or hi hwa s? C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either X an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature X (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X f.tb lt in inadequate parkingcapacity? X g.ict with adopted policies, plans, or programs X orting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, le racks)? Comments: 15. a.-b: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures: A traffic analysis and two supplemental traffic analysis has been prepared for the proposed project; "Traffic Study for Rancho Temecula Town Center, Katz, Okitsu & Associates, July, 2003", "Alternative Analysis for Winchester Road at Nicolas Road, Katz, Okitsu & Associates, July 27, 2004" and "Winchester Road at Nicolas Road, Katz, Okitsu & Associates, September 15, 2004." The proposed project is located on the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. Winchester Road is also known as Highway 79 North, which is subject to Caltrans jurisdiction. The traffic studies found that the intersection of Winchester Road at Nicolas Road would need to be improved, in order to maintain a Level of Service (LOS) of D or better, due to expected cumulative development in the area. It was recommended that near -term improvements could be achieved without widening of Nicolas Road. The City's Traffic Engineer has determined that at a minimum, additional dedication of right-of-way is required for the proposed project along with either: A. Improving the intersection at Winchester Road and Nicolas Road including a signal modification for the westbound Nicolas approach to provide i. two left turn lanes ii. one through lane and iii. one right turn lane The City of Temecula City Engineer shall have the discretion to determine which improvement is required in order to provide an adequate LOS for the intersection in question. With the above mentioned improvements, the LOS for the intersection will maintain a LOS of D or better at all times, including peak hours. R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\lnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 24 Table 1, below shows the delays and levels of service for the intersection for existing and near -term scenarios, assuming no mitigation. With no mitigation, the intersection would function at an LOS that is not acceptable under the City of Temecula General Plan. Table 1 — Delay and Level of Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Level of Delay Level of Service Service Existing Conditions 27.4 C 23.2 D Future Without Project 33.6 C 38.4 D Traffic Future With Project Traffic 35.2 D 75.7 E Note: Delay is in seconds per vehicle, average, The supplemental traffic study, dated September 15, 2004 identifies two potential scenarios that would mitigate the near term future impacts for the proposed project together with cumulative development impacts in the surrounding area. Table 2 shows the LOS that would be maintained if the mitigation included for split phase operation and included a left -turn land, an optional through -and -left -turn lane, and a right -turn land for westbound Nicolas Road at Winchester Road. Table 2 — Delay and Level of Service With Split -Phase Signal Mitigation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Level of Delay Level of Service Service Future With Project Traffic 37.4 D 29.8 C Note: Delay is in seconds per vehicle, average, Table 3 shows the LOS that would be maintained if the mitigation included two left turn lanes on Nicolas Road using conventional signal phasing by converting one of the through lanes into a left turn lane. Table 3 — Delay and Level of Service With Two Left Turn Lanes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Level of Delay Level of Service Service Future With Project Traffic 28.2 C 35.7 D Note: Delay is in seconds per vehicle, average, Table 2 and 3 both include improvements to the intersection that would mitigate the impacts to a LOS of D or better, which is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan. In addition, the dedication of additional right-of-way will provide the ultimate right-of-way for future road improvements that will serve development in the area (Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan). These improvements along with the dedication would mitigate the traffic and circulation impacts to a less than significant level. R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\lnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-i.doc 25 In addition, the City of Temecula City Engineer may require a traffic signal to be installed along Nicolas Road, approximately 700 feet south of the Nicolas Road and Winchester Road intersection. This signal would be required in order to provide additional access into the project site, thus reducing the amount of vehicles accessing the site directly from Winchester Road. A controlled intersection to and from the site allows for safer turning movements and reduces the potential for traffic backing onto public streets. The following Mitigation Measures are required for the proposed project: a. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Nicolas Road, approximately 700 feet east of the centerline of Highway 79 North (Winchester Road) or as approved by the Director of Public Works, b. Dedicate adequate right-of-way along westbound Nicolas road to allow additional lanes for ultimate road width, c. Submit a final traffic analysis prior to recordation of Tract Map No. 30719, d. Improve the intersection at Winchester Road and Nicolas Road including a signal modification for the westbound Nicolas Road approach (from northbound Nicolas Road to westbound Winchester Road) to provide : two left turn lanes, ii) one through lane, and iii) one right turn lane. The City of Temecula City Engineer shall have the final discretion to modify the mitigation measures mentioned above upon final review of the final traffic analysis. 15. c.: No Impact: The proposed project has been reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) and it was determined that the proposed project will not have an impact on the air traffic patterns and will not result in a substantial safety risk. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 15. d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project does not include the extension, construction or modification of any traffic patterns that would create sharp curves, dangerous intersections or establish incompatible uses that create a potentially significant impact. The proposed project is required to dedicate additional right-of-way for future turning lanes, however the dedication would not create an unsafe intersection, curve or traffic pattern. The applicant is proposing a monument sign at the corner of the intersection, which will require additional dedication of right-of-way, however, conditions of approval are in place that require the monument sign to provide adequate and safe visual clearances. 15. e.: No Impact: The proposed project includes four access points and proposes a fifth access point (easement) from the parcel to the east. The fifth access point will be provided once the project to the east is constructed. The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed project and have determined that adequate emergency access has been provided. In addition, on -site circulation has been reviewed using the emergency vehicle turning radius templates and it has been determined that on -site circulation is adequate for emergency vehicles. 15. f.: No Impact: The proposed project requires a total of 729 parking spaces. A total of 976 parking spaces are provided. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 15. g.: No Impact: The Riverside County Transit Agency (RTA) has submitted a letter requesting a bus turn- out. The proposed project has provided a bus turn -out as requested by the RTA. The applicant shall comply with the standards as set forth by the RTA. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town CenteNnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 26 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X aimlicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or X wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water X drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X accommodate the ro ect's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X regulations related to solid waste? Comments: 16. a. b. e.: Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16. c.: Less Than Significant Impact. The project will require on -site storm drains to be constructed. The project may require various State and Federal Permits. The project will include the construction of underground storm drains and drainage swales in various locations within the project site. No off -site storm drains or expansion of existing facilities are required as a result of this project. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District has reviewed the proposed plan and has determined that the proposed project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16. d.: No Impact. The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Rancho California Water District has provided "water available" letters to the City indicating water resources are available to serve to proposed project, provided the applicant signs an Agency Agreement with the Water District. The proposed project is also consistent with the General Plan and the General Plan Final EIR in regard to use and policies. Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\lnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-t.doc 27 16. f. g.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R1D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\lnitial Study Rancho Temecula Center-t.doc 28 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually X limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a Fc.b. project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current roiects, and the effects of robable future ro'ects ? Does the project have environmental effects which will X cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: 17. a.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The project will not degrade the quality of the environment on site or in the vicinity of the project. The developer may be required to obtain various State and Federal Permits including, Clean Water Act Section 401 permit from the U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers and clearance from the State Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). A traffic analysis has been completed and was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer to identify traffic calming devices and mitigation measures to maintain an acceptable level of service as required in the General Plan. 17. b.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The individual effects from the project are less than significant with Mitigation Measures incorporated into the project. The project will not have a cumulative effect on the environment since the project site is a commercial area in an urban area, surrounded by development. All cumulative effects for the various land uses of the subject site as well as the surrounding developments were analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. With the mitigation measures in place, the project will be consistent with the Specific Plan, General Plan and Development Code, the cumulative impacts related to the future development will not have a significant impact. 17. c.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The commercial project will be designed and developed consistent with the Specific Plan, Development Code, and the General Plan. Mitigation Measures are required in order to reduce impact to a less than significant level. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-1.doc 29 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 4. Traffic Study for Rancho Temecula Town Center in the City of Temecula, Katz, Okitsu & Associates, October, 2003, July 27, 2004 and September 15, 2004 5. Airport Land Use Commission Development Review, Riverside County, Conditions of Approval for file No. FV-04-104, July 22, 2004 6. Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Rancho Temecula Town Center, CRM Tech, November 24, 2003. 7. Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation, Rancho Temecula Town Center, Geocon Inc., June 17, 2003. 8. Hydrology and Hydraulic Report for Roripaugh Town Center, SB&O, Inc., July 22, 2004 9. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Program and Development Agreement, November 26, 2002 RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Initial Study Rancho Temecula Center-7.doc 30 2 k] m§ §_ � IL\ 2 ® /a cof /7 / CL fM \ [ )cc j/ ƒM3 co J k _ a o n 2 ° U)` CL f§ w \\ ��� CO cm §Ca mo CO) 2 \\\ \L)% = */ § E E ° ; )gp { 76 i §� \ o\9oA \ # ]§a \-�\/ -0 {=0 j\ )/j ))0\[ »k \ 9 LM P§� f f % tea a .off | a e d �vcl ; L- •co _ _ - \ E® §�)\\ ) �) \�f 0 w ))0C: 6 U 5 &f E/t, !)2 to \=e caC=mc >a\=a22 _� 03�%/&) 2«)§( \)\/ !{] \)){ g { R2-0 @ ca IL ƒ)-" +\E (n E //ƒk /\\f/\\CO 5" . _\aE S!2(»)m ��/\\ B k<k%8 «fQ) EIE � v g 0 0 c L /a £ /$#/{ 2R))z\= Q&) z 7`»:f )]c co �- ■ 2(2/9 E:= __, J »` )\/ w f ®(§){)§=0=w ) ®`^� « s k0og_�<eeo7.a� a 6(\\)f c :a M N N c N a) C.)_N U N U Y C 7 a) N Cni>N 07 07 .N- c N CO CL V a) c a) L C a) a) CDO Ea � Ea m a cy CL v v co o o Ir Um� Uco �ca � _� a�: U 7 y E c ca a) C E •„L„ O rn n O7 0) C (D � O 0) _ a) � c E 7 O) N 3o c c a) v -0 ca �-coo3�rLo- a.oc en m�y� a coo 0) c E ca a) 'gt ca m'2 o N my C U N O c N a as a) E� �E c a N c oC7 0 0 0 o N ccl as N a) 0 Cl u �a)cmoaci. �co=ccaac o N O coica�io �cac�E= 0 cgf,a 0 c ro c cca a y 0 a C C: cn0.V E c°m2) cu c�.��o.o 0QcaacE°oY°' c• > ar c• > N o N 16 ca2 o O c a'E m aN m N 2 N °'o_ C_ > •' a) ca a c O a) N L C O 7 > L C O O 'O a) O 7 � a) C >, _ 0 U C d can O N E U pa) a) O O d N O CO 'N Q U N N O_ is C y o Y c Co N -a E N O > N > N in Q .O-. O _ F N E O C .J = (a L N N co >. a) ca (n (Oj N Y .+' U Y m a) n Ecra a) av o E c mm� cov o a� o aa) o •° a`) ma ° °' d o a °D °a a� a�'S' a�LL ° o am a a) > 3L �o ca ar rn o` a._ o wuJ aa._ aU Ud a� N (a C caca C M c° ca a (a n ca a a) 5 U U ro U L U 0 c U) c E c c E m c ° c c o fA 2C1, a) ca oo Uf—C7 _ mo U1—C7 ago U!—C'3 CO O L Y o L a c CCa. c � c> H� 3) N o o nL ca O'ainn C i� L Y N L a) 7) O 0-0 enC a) ca a) N N O > N— iz CO a) O- O N Co N to.-. "O c a C L O ca r O ocao as a—ca`Z CL 0 Q c N 3 as c co p) •p i..) O L N a) N COcc ocn c E U m .N U o m c a) _,r is a) c E o O. (Ca E, Q V ca -O_ m .- -E M N a) U) L E (D ca a) 0 -a ` c Noon aZi > a) °E> ° o- E m"o)'`O 0 a Cr-° o � p c a) a c E E c U 3 — U Q CO �.T. N C O` N t N a) E 0 cc N V N N E N N CO c o L N> ca O L N N n m N a w E m d N asp E c °)o c c E aj Y c c mcaaa a) c ca > yU o ci N E ca a) I o ns a� o a) m ca 7 , c O Q 3 'O 7 O_ Q m p_ Q L e m U .O_ n >. O U co o cCa .fC_a m w CL a) c °o n�� aa)) O a� coo aa) o o aE ccccL N r.N a)-C _M nj a)t fca La) 0).5 E ML-06— ca �L N 7 a) 7 cL c) O~ C G m H H m F a m H H OL. N m H O r 0 O CO N Y 0 N r t N r >1 U U N U IL IL aE aE m ° m r c CO r c m Co a0 ro m a 0) O) o c c .L cY cY C ¢ a� a� a� m LCIS c C _ co N .- .� m > _ > Q m O O C ° O) N c a) C C zz O a) C p t Co - w E ca mm 0) o-E E oCOo co .._ �o>> m- ° °cia ) a) o m O m U °a N m 0 m C m C O Y M O-0U m O 7a N N N .N y C m 0)0 E 0)0 m - - m N Y O U 'C o m 3 -a ca C -0 �N N0 NNu (a U) 0 � YN E m aa C cO 3 00 O- a) a N a E7q 0U ) C7 U a1 Oa o ao ao'o �oa0 aE) O aaam 0)-m0 EL c m m m C m and ma ma ma 0 > > m O ' m o aa)i N C > o N a`) >1E c o aa)i a`) E c aa)i a`) >. >1E cad "O >1E �-° 7 O <n a) a) UHC7 Y a) m UFC7 a) O C .- CUI-0 0U) a) C .. 0E-0 m<n 00)ccn00)CDa) Y c' L C C U c a a) =0 "0 V Y0 o7ym O c a) N O m ca U E 0-0 `°ra-00 m c a). 0 o aa) E 3 U) c: m y. rnm' rn o �° 3 m. E O m n E o m° - c° ° o o a s L L = a N �-v N m 3 v° 3 aE E°- 9 c.0° °c'c 0 o az ° m N a�i o� aNi a�.>_ c o o mYc aa))( ro ro'aE0a 3m oDE0U)) m >..N c !n a) 0) 0)'0 = 'V (h 0) � y N ° c0i as a) cna) o f 3 a> E C 7L c D) S- N 0cts m�� ° ca <a O E> 7 01 CL 7 C a) 0 N H r 'c ° ca Own°� c d� m3`oo>mn>0 0�o>c- `) U> a> U O C m a) C 0 a) 0-0 m m 6 U y-- C 7 w a)ro O U -0 - -0 C "0 c m N 0 N ca N C C U N i= m Y C 0 7 m N _0 N N- a) m N m O a) U c a) \O N = L C) O (n (n c c 3 0) m N d !n E N ' L E U "0 U C 7 C _0 01 O c c 0 o m a> C j E d N ca .�0 ° O .L-. C Q C > p a) U a) m n a> U .0 to D) N -0 a) O U E m O` O C c CO N CO C N C 0) o N> 0. E a 0 CD � �- a) C ° orsa) L N 2 C> 7 .- r N= .c 4) 0 E m O m C fn � D a) r 3 m m N V) a ma`m9Em3-8a) a) C c aowNa)000C- 7 E 4> p Lmo Co 0 0 0-00ma3oCA'0 7 m k )§ �r 2 }/ a }} / $ 7\ 7\ ( CL ƒ� C }) ) ƒ\ �0_ c)0c00 § \&mmtf� ° 77c $ 2 k))a) \%{/�)�00 m*®%ffC 2 fo%!: o �D0±E `e® 2{/«a) \/.2 )Et°m ``f\2k))\ 0 f o- t \�£ $//§ §{£!$)ccl £ �)§Q2E g c0 ,CL>,0 2LE 3:c BE $ «/a7a a)c a)0= g(:m:0Lno -% m EE=j � \�72§ £»¥taa{ @f¥J!k_fE E :ln=> 25&f":\ /�o0)a) 2/ fc-ca E )\2m/= bE\/�® )=7 6)/78 CL=t{E§q »&&G§&COE§§ ) ) m- c - / \): d | _\ °EC 2 \EC-, \ k \/A§] 02$7J /� /0 =10C £�- �k/\En �\ /k\\7 \{ CL E, =2 ¢a,Eo� Iop, - `0 ¢7E� }�� �2\\ Ma) (Zr�\`L ®°\G=§ co c�/ = \S O C0 {{§@�/2£ 2=)P0 0c0aisrco O 9�5mm\ r§=f% `)%2 ® §$'+m° ° c 555\® (*(7 00 = )0 0 _ 0 §p,/q9 § ca � /{Q2�\ kU%2o f§)27%{ -/j�� 'E 0CE D)) co \- )k [j7q± &,2 (LEE= 3c5 k 2r aI � { \ ) 2 / / - \a - ) ) §/ 0/ 0aa\ f §� > k)\ /g £a*= §> E co �\o\\-02ko \�\)a), \ 0 `-£=±752j _ -\f222= �£ _ � fG2|m�£§c 2 § ° 22£ 2kl��\k\k r-:3Q) � c ' k§a)0E)-a:— �»a\a� ` ��_�/&#-mE 2i-f222:f« § ° / 0 C)= 77)>Co Fn ) tt:t! ! k \ ±72\§ocaEl� I �&&Om&I&§§ 0ca EEc§/o@ \ / \_ ; k � ) k 7k> _ cj § 2�| E6a)C) ` §\sƒ/ _\E$-& ±- °2E_� ,k% �% )\co \ S CO ul CD & @ > &�0m2 @2=- =_ °ƒ m- = 05 0 %Ca 33 K �j &/\)\ 7 CO- - 'e -0 0) §jk \\2 c 9 o -o \\±o_ a0 _0. ==m m_n m,&g @3@ # %_ c Co o§= 2 ) &�2f/f ®/006 ie#7 d4om�_ de\Eco , . tn q §• e£ £ {f a 3E �\ \k k \� a\ �k )A � _ m ) -c= 0w7\§u\ \\} # 7 /\)«tf\±% u 0U) 0 f\0 \\]\\o�\t %\f k f/) f)f\[)0\k - ¥a[a)U) -" \§\ | m \\u ()\\)r & i \9)E%ƒkk{ 1621 6)=&£=CO \\) \ ; ]\�» 2 k - A/7d r_ 0 / & £ a) Co 0 § [\Q cu - �t\ ()\j '*= CD >_ )&- ±k6) .,$0 k 2=Co =0.— a§{\ _ ®#_cm | )/t§ - k --EC is \\\> -0Z or 70(2 �§2/ n w \ / LCL 0 % = o S 6/mQ`a/ILzJ Ew k )/ m7 ■_ ccE IL 2 \ / CL ) m� ' ��0 _ ! C\/3§k\ 7 0 <5!E = ) / CL 0 CL > m 2 r=o %0Da) §logo E §#f\77\)ccc &_& s 7i))2\p/\s°§ § a)CU =-Ef)t£)D'0 c:=2:=/a CL )/§77-I\�a) I m&3IG0LLaom � �\#/G , {=]a\G @ e k Da \< � w 0 a ® . )% ■ 00 2 2 )± N � } z 0 k )\\ £ {f\ § )\3 \ '� a = 7-3 / () �§ 32 E { &co ] 3 / f l - ) j E \: 2 .0\ c ) {A\ )) !£2 5 $ § 2\ g §(§ - iMn $ E o 0 27 o e r! go b�. o f �&Q 6 \ CU S U)CL j7) \\ S 7 ) a) » ! \\\\)\ \}\#\c - n >_ tab[ ®a7k)\) [[£�/\ ]o-6 _0 �`0C \] 2 „ _ _] aac 6 iE t /±k%4/ a2 ) § \® k(CcL c={/ | \�\��0 \/\��\\ 5/=[&) o=oj)\m ; % 0-0 cn f ± t) za) £ ` f)(!_m= 2 )�\\$72 0 Qmc E . - ® C: f § o & - Q/�§±Ikfa\cts ui ca =)«Q)ca 2 2 ±<f]S/:g±CESo+o& - a 2 §2 ■r { �— 3 t k a cLk ) © =5 `m ` ®_f je CL /� �{ �/ �/Q) 0 � 2 a[ a, £me ){ )3 )/ )3Cl ) cc E . /% o0 \ 2/j ) )\2 �\\ \ \ k \k/ �\ \// t_ @ § »k! &® )co CL o= l ()f 0 ) 0a) 7\[ /%« 0a) k _®` ®' fib\ ±Q` Q� £9\ kt) 0-0 CO 00 I §m« CL =m2 =St »2/ » ƒ « ƒ CL _ e C: (2\ \j\ 7 g k ( a A \ § e ,7 / a) =\=]E 72 \\]§ ` 0'z° ca °,nt } 7n-0r =9 _ — + 22�c tt r- U) �)\[ 0 )`co )\2) \\ K \02 )� /)) c =2!! §f= §- ®�§—_° {: co bi/]\) )q 7k{{ c 0 a R )=)=2\ c tea) §®a a \/ D\ Z( \0->1 E} 2 6�� j0 \)\Cr) CO 2 2 g)#�)§ ))ma °E cam0 Ito��� & ! eEC6 �2 -Z {�!. « Z 2og\ §5\\a#==\» i=o. R § a/$eEa_ o±2ea5»Ia� a$(e s ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 04 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-t.doc 7 RESOLUTION NO. 04-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) ON 20.2 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100- 013 (PA02-0360) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a comprehensive, long-term General Plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well as any adjacent areas which, in the judgment of the city, bears a relationship to its planning; and B. Pacific Development Partners, LLC, filed Planning Application Nos. PA02-0360, General Plan Amendment, for the property consisting of approximately 20.2 acres generally located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 ("Project'); C. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act; D. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on October 20, 2004 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental review, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-056, recommending approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program; and F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-057, recommending approval of a General Plan Amendment; and, G. The City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on , 2004 to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment; and H. On , 2004 and 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Final PC GPA RESOLUTION.doc 5 I. On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 04-_; J. On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a General Plan Amendment for the Project when it approved Resolution No. 04- Section 2. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. B. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area. Section 3. Amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map. The City Council hereby amends the General Plan Land Use Designations for the City of Temecula for 20.2 acres, located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road, generally known as Assessor Parcel Numbers 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC). Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of QiZ1T91 Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town CenterTinal PC GPA RESOLUTION.doc 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2004 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan Jones, CIVIC, City Clerk RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Final PC GPA RESOLUTION.doc 7 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso GPA Draft.doc 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 041_ SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 8 ORDINANCE NO. 04-. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR PLANNING AREA 9 OF THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) AND INCORPORATE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING AREA 9 (PA02-0363). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Pacific Development Partners, LLC, filed Planning Application Nos. PA02-0360, General Plan Amendment; PA02-0363, Specific Plan Amendment; PA02-0364, Development Plan; PA02-0365; Tentative Parcel Map; and PA04-0540, Conditional Use Permit for the property consisting of approximately 20.2 acres generally located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 ("Project'); B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on October 20, 2004 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental review, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-056 recommending approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Project; Resolution No. 2004-057 recommending the City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 2004-059 recommending the City Council approval of a Tentative Parcel Map; Resolution No. 2004-060 recommending the City Council approval of a Development Plan; and Resolution No. 2004-061 recommending the City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit; E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-058, recommending approval of a Specific Plan Amendment; F. On 2004 and 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. G. On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 04-_; approving a General Plan Amendment, Resolution No. 04- _; approving a Tentative Parcel Map, Ordinance No. 04-_; approving a Development WO P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Pinal PC SPA RESOLUTION.doc 5 Plan, Resolution No. 04-_ ; and approving a Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 04- H. On 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Specific Plan Amendment for the Project when it approved Ordinance No. 04- Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan as described below. A. Amend the land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial as shown in Exhibit "A": B. Amend the text of Planning Area 9 to reflect Community Commercial and include updated language pertaining to development standards and design guidelines for commercial development as shown in Exhibit "B" Section 3. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of _, 2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Cenwr\Final PC SPA RESOLUTION.doc 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 04-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day of , 2004 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RA 3 P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\Final PC SPA RESOLUTIONAo 7 EXHIBIT A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN NO. i AMENDMENT NO.3 City of Temecula Community Development Department - Planning Division 432oo Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Phone: 909.694.6400 Fax: 909.694.6477 Contact: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning Applicant: Pacific Development Partners, LLC 177 S. Beverly Drive, znd Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90212-3002 Phone: 3i0.278.9595 Contact: Mark Burger June zoo4 Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan Ammdmmt No3 .Summary Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan No. 1, Amendment No. 3 (SPA 3) changes the existing neighborhood commercial designation for Planning Area 9 to community commercial. An associated General Plan Amendment has been submitted with SPA 3. Commercial Architectural Design Guidelines have been added for Planning Areas 9. All other land uses and design standards as outlined in Roripaugh Estates, Specific Plan Amendment No. 2, as approved by the City of Temecula City Council on August 8, 1994 shall remain in effect. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 04-_ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Staff Report-1.doc 9 RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30719 TO SUBDIVIDE 20.2 ACRES INTO 12 PARCELS, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02- 0365). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Pacific Development Partners, LLC, filed Planning Application Nos. PA02-0360, General Plan Amendment; PA02-0363, Specific Plan Amendment; PA02-0364, Development Plan; PA02-0365, Tentative Parcel Map; and PA04-0540, Conditional Use Permit for the property consisting of approximately 20.2 acres generally located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 ("Project'); B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act; C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on October 20, 2004 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental review, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-056 recommending approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Project; Resolution No. 2004-057 recommending the City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 2004-058 recommending the City Council approval of a Specific Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 2004-060 recommending the City Council approval of a Development Plan; and Resolution No.2004-061 recommending the City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit; E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-059 recommending approval of a Tentative Parcel Map; F. On , 2004 and 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. G. On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 04-_; approving a General Plan Amendment, Resolution No. 04- RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 1 approving a Specific Plan Amendment, Ordinance No. 04-_; approving a Development Plan, Resolution No. 04- and approving a Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 04- , H. On 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Tentative Parcel Map for the Project when it approved Resolution No. 04- Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. The Project, including the Tentative Map, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Project, including the Tentative Map, has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. B. The Project, including the Tentative Map, is compatible with surrounding land uses. C. The Project, including the Tentative Map, will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The Project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site and represents a relocation of existing land uses. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find determine and declare that: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, Subdivision Ordinance, General Plan, Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code for the following reason: The proposed subdivision map is consistent with the subject Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan development standards and related General Plan Amendment. B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract; C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map as proposed by the Applicant; D. The design of the proposed subdivision and the proposed improvements, with appropriate conditions of approval, is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no known fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off -site. IN addition, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and certified prior to action on the Application; E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 2 F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided; H. The subdivision is a commercial project and is not subject to Quimby fees. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 30719, Application No. PA02-0365, subdividing 20.2 acres into 12 parcels, for the property generally located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road known as assessors parcel no(s). 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 subject to the specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of 2004. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 04- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the th day of 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso TPM Final.doc 4 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP RAD P\2002NO2-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA02-0365 Project Description: A Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 30719) to subdivide 20.2 acres into 12 parcels located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. DIF: TUMF: MSHCP: Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION Retail Commercial Retail Commercial Retail Commercial 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 October 20, 2004 October 20, 2007 Within Forty -Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a check or money order made payable to the Riverside County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty -Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 6 employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application Nos. PA02-0360, PA02-0363, PA02-0364, PA02-0365 and PA04-0540. 5. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 6. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 7. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. A qualified paleontologist/archaeologist shall be chosen by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological/ archaeological impacts. A meeting between the paleontologist/ archaeologist, Planning Department staff, and grading contractor prior to the commencement of grading operations and the excavation shall be arranged. The paleontologisUarchaeologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. 9. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appear to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso TPM Final.doc 7 a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. This mitigation measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. 10. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall be contacted to afford the Band an opportunity to monitor ground -disturbing activities and participate in the decisions regarding collection and curation of any such resources. The applicant shall submit correspondence to the Planning Department that confirms that such contact has been made prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. The Applicant shall enter into a pre -construction agreement/treatment plan with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, prior to the issuance of grading permits, that sets forth and contains the terms and conditions for the treatment of discoveries of Native American cultural resources. The agreement/treatment plan shall contain provisions for the treatment of all Native American cultural items, artifacts, and human remains that may be uncovered during the project. The agreement/treatment plan may allow for the presence of Pechanga tribal monitors during any ground -disturbing activities. The applicant shall submit a signed copy of the pre -construction agreement/treatment plan to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 12. The Applicant and/or landowner agrees to relinquish all cultural resources, including all archeological artifacts, that are found on the Project area to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and disposition. This mitigation measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. 13. Prior to any ground disturbance activities a qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. This mitigation measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. 14. If any human remains are encountered on the project site, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will be terminated immediately and the County Coroner's office and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians will be contacted to arrange for the treatment of such remains. This mitigation measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 15. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: This property is located within thirty miles (30) of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. ii. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 8 iii. This project is within a liquefaction hazard zone. iv. This property is located within an area identified by the City of Temecula General Plan as being a sensitive area with regards to archeological resources. C. An Owners Association shall be established and the applicant shall submit a copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) that address the following: i. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance, identify and include methods of maintaining all landscape areas, drive aisles, private roads, parking areas and other common areas. ii. No lot or unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. iii. Every owner of a unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. 16. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross -lot access and parking across all lots. 17. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide verification that a landscape and irrigation plan has been submitted to Caltrans, for the project's frontage along Winchester Road (Highway 79 North) right-of-way. Three copies of the landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and the applicant shall pay the Landscape Plan Review Fee applicable at the time of submittal. Landscaping shall be approved by Caltrans and the City of Temecula and installed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. 18. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit a landscape bond for the installation of planting and irrigation required in the right-of-way along the project's Highway 79 North frontage in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department and/or Caltrans, whichever is applicable. 19. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the property owner shall submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso TPM Final.doc 9 period of one-year from the date of the installation of the landscaping in the right-of-way along the project's Highway 79 North frontage. Prior to Release of Power or First Occupancy Permit 20. Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, all landscape planting and irrigation required in the right-of-way along the project's Highway 79 South frontage shall be installed. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. General Requirements 21. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 22. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City -maintained road right-of-way. 23. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 24. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-way. 25. All improvement and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 26. The vehicular movement from the project site onto Winchester Road shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. 27. The vehicular movement from the project site's westerly access onto Nicolas Road shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. 28. The vehicular movement from the project site's easterly access onto Nicolas Road shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. Prior to Approval of the Tract Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: 29. A Final Traffic Analysis shall be submitted and approved. RAD Pt2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 10 30. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District C. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District d. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau e. Planning Department f. Department of Public Works g. Riverside County Health Department h. Cable TV Franchise i. Caltrans j. Community Services District k. Verizon I. Southern California Edison Company M. Southern California Gas Company 31. The Developer shall dedicate a 25-foot wide transportation corridor along Winchester Road. 32. The Developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Winchester Road (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities and utilities that serves this project (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Improve Nicolas Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' RAN) to include dedication of 17 additional feet of street right-of-way, installation of street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), raised landscaped median. i. Dedicate adequate right-of-way along westbound Nicolas Road to allow additional lanes for ultimate road width per the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan requirements which is defined in Condition No. 12.b.iii. ii. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Nicolas Road, approximately 700 feet east of the centerline of Highway 79 North (Winchester Road) or as approved by the Director of Public Works. iii. Improve the intersection at Winchester Road and Nicolas Road including a signal modification for the westbound Nicolas Road approach to provide 1. Two left turn lanes 2. One through lane 3. One right turn lane. RAO P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 11 iv. The developer shall design and construct the raised landscape median on Nicolas Road (Arterial Highway Standards —110' ROW), from Winchester Road to Roripaugh Road or as approved by the Director of Public Works. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. 33. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207A. C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground 34. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 35. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Highway 79 North (Winchester Road) on the Parcel Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 36. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Nicolas Road on the Parcel Map with the exception of three openings as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 37. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805. 38. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 12 39. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to City Council approval of the Parcel Map\Final Map, the Developer shall make an application for reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency. 40. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 41. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. 42. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 43. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off -site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the Final Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off -site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 44. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards by the cable company at time of street improvements. 45. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. 46. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 47. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 48. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 49. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: RAD P12002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 13 a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District C. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works 50. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. 51. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 52. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 53. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off -site or on -site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. 54. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction -phase and post - construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction - phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post -construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction -phase and post - construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post -construction BMPs. HAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso TPM Final.doc 14 55. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 56. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 57. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off -site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 58. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, Final Map 30719 shall be approved and recorded. 59. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 60. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 61. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 62. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 63. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District C. Department of Public Works 64. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 15 65. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 66. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 67. Any previous existing conditions for this project or any underlying map will remain in full force and effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here. 68. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 69. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III -A) 70. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 71. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land division per CFC Appendix III -A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a four-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III -A) 72. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4 x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 16 from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 73. All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii. 74. Intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level. 75. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road. 76. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field. 77. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 78. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) 79. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 80. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 81. Prior to building construction, this development and any street serving any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 82. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso TPM Final.doc 17 presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 83. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 84. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 85. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arcinfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. 86. Any existing or installed water system in support of hydrants or fire sprinkler systems that was installed as a common system serving the property that will now be divided into more than one parcel will be the responsibility of ALL PARCELS and will be maintained and repaired by ALL PARCELS in perpetuity. 87. This parcel when divided shall maintain reciprocal access to all parcels. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 88. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 30, 2004 from the Rancho California Water District. 89. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 26, 2002 from the Department of Environmental Health. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Applicant's Printed Name Date RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso TPM Final.doc 18 Board of Directors John E. Hoagland President cash. F. Ko Sr. Via President Stephen J. Corona Ralph H. Daily Ben R. Drake Li.. D. Herman John V. Rossi otrars: Brian J. Brady General Manager Phillip L Forbes Director of Finance -Treasurer E.P. "Bob' Lemon Director of Engineering Perry R. Louck Controller June 30, 2004 Dan Long, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 JUL 0 2 2004 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY, RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 30719; PARCELS NO. 1 THROUGH NO. 13 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 26232-1; APN 920- 100-002, APN 920-100-003, APN 920-100-004, APN 920-100-008, APN 920-100-009, AND APN 920-100-010; PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0365 Dear Mr. Long: Please be advised that the above -referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on -site and/or off -site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. Linda M. Fragoso District Secretary/Administrative Semrea Menagae This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium C. Miehael Cowett development, with individual building owners and an owners' association Beal Beat d Krieger LLP General counsel maintaining the common property and private water, fire protection, and landscape irrigation facilities. As a condition of approval for the project, RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on -site private water facilities. In addition to this agreement, RCWD would require individual water meters for each condominium unit. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 7M/iaael G. "Meyerpeter Development Engineering Manager 04\MM:aro83\FCF c: Bud Jones, Engineering Project Coordinator Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor 42135 W irahaaw, Road • Pint Once Box 9017 - Temeeula, California 92589 %17 • ON) 296 69M - PAX (909) 296-6860 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE • HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH July 26, 2002 City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 ATTN: Thomas Thornsley: RE: TRACT MAP NO. 30719 (52 LOTS) A Portion of Lots 168, 181, 183, and 184 of Temecula Land and Water Company, shown by map on file in book 8 page 359 of maps, San Diego County Records, together with those portions of Hamilton Avenue, Banana Street, John Jay Avenue, and the Northwesterly half of Apricot Street; Together with a portion of the Rancho Temecula as shown per map recorded in book 1, page 37 of patents in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, all being in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California. — Dz=ar Genti�ers __... _.._ The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tract Map 30719 and recommends: A water system shall be installed in accordance with plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Environmental Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor's Office. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans, shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Map 30719 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such "Tract Map". This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. A responsible official of the water company shall sign this certification. The plans 2. This Department has no written statement from Rancho California Municipal Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made PRIOR to the recordation of 4065 County Circle Drive • Riverside, CA 92503 • Phone (909) 358-5316 • FAX (909) 358.5017 (Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 • Riverside, CA 92513-7600) oa.ea..o*i.ayor•• Page Two Attn: Thomas Thornsley July 24, 2002 3. This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed in accordance with plans and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor's Office and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor's Office. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be singed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map No. 30719 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map". The plans must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to review at least two weeks PRIOR to the request for the recordation of the final map. 4. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized PRIOR to recordation of the final map. 5. It will be necessary for the annexation proceedings to be completely finalized PRIOR to the recordation of the final map. Sin Sa a Ine*.'uervisi vironmental Health Specialist (909)955-8980 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 04-, DEVELOPMENT PLAN RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doC 10 RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0364, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 162,860 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE, INCLUDING THREE MAJOR TENANTS, SEVEN PADS AND A TOTAL OF FOUR DRIVE -THROUGH FACILITIES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, KNOWN AS APN: 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Pacific Development Partners, LLC, filed Planning Application Nos. PA02-0360, General Plan Amendment; PA02-0363, Specific Plan Amendment; PA02-0365, Tentative Parcel Map; PA02-0364, Development Plan; and PA04-0540, Conditional Use Permit, for the property consisting of approximately 20.2 acres generally located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 ("Project'). B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on October 20, 2004 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental review, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-056 recommending approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Project; Resolution No. 2004-057 recommending the City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 2004-058 recommending the City Council approval of a Specific Plan Amendment; Resolution No.2004-059 recommending the City Council approval of a Tentative Parcel Map; and Resolution No. 2004-061 recommending the City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit; E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-060 recommending approval of a Development Plan; F. On , 2004 and 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. R1D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso DP-Drafl.doc G. On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 04-_; approving a General Plan Amendment, Resolution No. 04- _; approving a Specific Plan Amendment, Ordinance No. 04-_; approving a Tentative Parcel Map, Resolution No. 04-_ ; and approving a Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 04- H. On 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Development Plan for the Project when it approved Resolution No. 04- Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. The Project, including the Development Plan, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Project, including the Development Plan, has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. B. The Project, including the Development Plan, is compatible with surrounding land uses. C. The Project, including the Development Plan, will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The Project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site and represents a relocation of existing land uses. Section 3. The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula, the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan, the Development Code and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the project has been reviewed and it has been determined that the project is consistent with all applicable zoning ordinances, state law and the General Plan. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare, because the project has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and the project has been reviewed and conditioned to comply with the uniform building and fire codes. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Application for a Development Plan (PA02-0364) for the construction of approximately 162,860 square feet of retail commercial space, including three major tenants, seven pads and a total of four drive - through facilities, located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 subject to the specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Draft.doc Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of 2004 Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 04- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the th day of ,2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Draft.doc 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-DraR.doc EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA02-0364 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct approximately 162,860 square feet of commercial retail spaces, including three major anchor tenants, seven pads and a total of four drive -through facilities, located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. Development Impact Fee: Retail Commercial TUMF: Retail Commercial Approval Date: October 20, 2004 Expiration Date: October 20, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty -Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a check or money order made payable to the Riverside County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty -Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify RAD Pt2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Draft.doc both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 4. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan, contained on file with the Planning Department. 6. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved (Conceptual Landscape Plan) contained on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 7. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 8. This development Plan may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.05.010 of the City's Development Code. 9. Automatic shut-off of water and electrical systems, except for security and fire protection, shall be provided during non -business hours. 10. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso DP-Draft.doc a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. 11. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 12. The elevations for each pad, shall require a separate development plan application to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director (except pads K and L, which are subject to Planning Commission Approval). The architectural elevations, landscaping, hardscape and color palette shall blend with the overall center as approved by the Planning Director. 13. The architectural elevations and color palette for Major E shall be revised to blend with the architecture style and color palette of the overall center as approved by the Planning Director. 14. The west elevation of Major E facing the street (Nicolas Road) shall be revised to provide additional detail and articulation along this elevation, as approved by the Planning Director. The features shall blend with the architectural style throughout the project center. 15. Major E shall be revised to include additional landscaping at the base of the building along the front entry and along the elevation facing Nicolas Road, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 16. Buildings with upper story windows shall include decorative window sills and/or window surrounds in select locations as approved by the Planning Director. 17. The drive -through lanes for Pads K and L shall include a structural component over the drive -through lane the length of the building(s) and include landscaped berms for screening. Said component shall be compatible with the architectural style and color palette of the overall center. 18. The trash enclosure located on the eastern portion of the site, adjacent to the note indicating future drive easement shall be relocated to the northern side of the easement and remain within a landscaped planter. 19. Decorative lighting fixtures shall be provided in the courtyard area between Shops C and D-1 and along the primary driveway from Winchester Road. Final construction plans shall provide details of all light fixtures, including decorative entry lighting, parking lot lighting and wall mounted lighting. 20. All shopping cart storage areas shall be internalized to any building or screened, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 21. The decorative hardscape within the drive aisles at the internal intersection shall be revised to create decorative design and colors subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 22. The landscaped area along Winchester Road shall include a meandering berm with large shrubs to provide additional screening of the parking lot and drive -through. RAO P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Drakdoc 23. The rear elevation of Major H shall provide a screening component for the loading area, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 24. The sides and rear of Major H shall be enhanced with decorative details, features and landscaping (four-sided architecture). 25. The applicant shall provide details of the outdoor furniture and any fountain water features, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 26. The applicant shall submit a final color and finish detail for all decorative hardscape. 27. All trash enclosures shall blend with the architecture of the overall center and include a decorative roof type feature as approved by the Planning Director. 28. A minimum 5' width planting area shall be provided at the ends of all parking rows throughout the site. The planter length shall be equal to the adjoining parking space. The planter shall contain a minimum of one tree, shrubs and ground covers. 29. Larger trees shall be provided at the intersection of Winchester and Nicolas to provide a stronger focal point. The landscape layout shall be revised as required to allow for a minimum of four (4) large evergreen background trees (minimum 48" box size) to be installed behind the Crape Myrtles as approved by the Director of Planning. 30. One broad canopy type tree shall be provided per 4 parking spaces. The trees shall be in close proximity to the 4 parking spaces they are to shade, except for those parking spaces abutting the in -line shops(shops A-D). Broad canopy trees for the parking spaces abutting the in -line shops shall be provided throughout the parking lot areas. 31. Small color shrub plantings shall be incorporated throughout the project site as approved by the Director of Planning. 32. The round -about located in the center of the project shall be revised to include a decorative hardscape to match and blend with the other hardscape within the center as approved by the Director of Planning. 33. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan and cross section showing a meandering berm and landscaping along Winchester Road. The landscaped berm shall be a height that will adequately screen the parking lot and vehicles in the drive -through lane. Shrubs on the berm shall be of a type that will grow to an adequate height and be maintained at a height that will screen vehicles in the drive -through lane and the parking lot. 34. A sign program shall be submitted for review and approval for the project site. 35. The applicant shall relocate the roof access ladders to a discreet location, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 36. The applicant shall revise the corner entry monument (Winchester Road at Nicolas Road) and the drive aisle in front of Major H to enhance the area with landscaping and trellises and reduce the number of parking spaces, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso DP-Draft.doc 37. The applicant shall revise the rear of the elevations and loading areas to avoid the back of building appearance. The loading wing walls shall include decorative features and include landscaping with vines. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 38. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record a final map. 39. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage 40. The applicant shall submit verification that the project site includes a recorded cross -lot and reciprocal parking agreement. If such an agreement does not exist, the applicant shall provide staff with a recorded cross -lot and reciprocal parking agreement. 41. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 42. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval with the landscape construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carryout the detailed program. 43. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 44. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 45. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F', or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. C. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso DP-Draft.doc Prior to Building Occupancy 46. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. 47. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 48. All landscape plans within the Caltrans ROW shall be approved by Caltrans and the City of Temecula and fully installed. POLICE DEPARTMENT 49. Landscaping: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are kept at a height of no more than three feet (3') or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the building utilizing lower level windows. a. Applicant should ensure all trees surrounding the building roof top be kept at a distance so as to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Trees also act as a natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a 6 feet clearance from the building. b. The placement of all landscaping should comply with guidelines from Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). 50. Lighting: All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex should be energy -saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting Ordinance. Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting Requirements. a. All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed. 51. Hardware: All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 52. Graffiti: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building shall be removed or painted over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police Department immediately so a report can be taken. 53. Alarm System: Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the police department immediately of any intrusion. 54. Roof Hatches: All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 55. Public Telephones: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building should be placed in a well -lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the building. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Draft.doc 10 56. Marked Parking for Disabled Vehicles: All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 57. Crime Prevention: a. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association 1127-11tt' Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program. b. Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department. C. Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures are also available through the crime prevention unit. d. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business -advising customers of the "Inkless Ink program in use". If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 58. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 59. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City -maintained street right-of-way. 60. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 61. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-way. 62. All improvement plans, grading plans and raised landscape median plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Draft.doc t 63. The developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works Department. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approach, storm drain facilities and sewer and domestic water systems. 64. The vehicular movement from the project site onto Winchester Road shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. 65. The vehicular movement from the project site's westerly access onto Nicolas Road shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. 66. The vehicular movement from the project site's easterly access onto Nicolas Road shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. 67. A Final Traffic Analysis shall be submitted and approved Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 68. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 69. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 70. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 71. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 72. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction -phase and post - construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction - phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post -construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso DP-Draft.doc 12 a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with storm water and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction -phase and post - construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post -construction BMPs. 73. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District C. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e. Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau 74. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 75. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off - site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 76. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 77. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 78. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall comply with the following: a. Final Map No. 30719 shall be approved and recorded. b. Dedicate a 25 foot wide transportation corridor along Winchester Road. C. Dedicate adequate right-of-way along westbound Nicolas Road to allow additional lanes for ultimate road width per the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan requirements. 79. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Dratt.doo 13 a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, 801, 802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. g. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 80. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Winchester Road (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities and utilities that serve this project (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Improve Nicolas Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include dedication of additional street right-of-way to satisfy Condition No. 55 (above), installation of street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), raised landscaped median. C. The Developer shall design and construct the raised landscape median on Nicolas Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W), from Winchester Road to Roripaugh Road or as approved by the Director of Public Works. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. 81. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 82. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 83. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 84. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Drakdoc 14 Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 85. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer shall: a. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Nicolas Road, approximately 700 feet east of the centerline of Highway 79 North (Winchester Road) or as approved by the Director of Public Works. b. Improve the intersection at Winchester Road and Nicolas Road including a signal modification for the westbound Nicolas Road approach to provide Two left turn lanes One through lane iii. One right turn lane 86. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District C. Department of Public Works 87. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 88. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 89. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 90. Please provide an analysis of the floor area for all occupancies proposed, include ratio of differing areas, as applicable, per requirements of California Building Code section 504.3. 91, Provide on the plans appropriate number of plumbing fixtures as required in California Building Code Appendix Table A-29-A. 92. Provide sufficient details on the plans to show conformance with California Building Code Section 1127B.1 for accessible exterior routes of travel between buildings on site. (Consider path of travel from Buildings G, H, J, and M to other accessible buildings on site.) 93. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one -quarter mile of an occupied residence. R1D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Draft.doc 15 Monday -Friday 6:30 a.m. — 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. — 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 94. All perimeter landscaping including parkways within the ROW, fencing and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. 95. Any damage caused to the existing Class II Bike Lanes on Nicolas Road during construction shall be repaired and/or replaced to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 96. Developer shall provide pedestrian access from the Santa Gertrudis Creek trail to project. 97. Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. 98. Trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as a regular solid waste container. 99. Installation of the landscape improvements within the medians on Nicolas shall commence pursuant to a pre -construction meeting with the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent and monitored in accordance with the TCSD inspection process. 100. The developer, the developer's successors or assignees, shall be responsible for the landscaping maintenance of the medians until such time as maintenance duties are accepted by the TCSD. 101. The developer shall take protective measures to ensure that construction debris and silt does not flow into Santa Gertrudis Creek or onto the trail. 102. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 103. Prior to issuance of the first building permit or installation of arterial streetlights along Nicolas and Winchester Roads, which ever comes first, the developer shall submit to TCSD the approved Southern California Edison streetlight plans, along with a Streetlight Authorization forms and payment of Advanced Energy Fees. 104. The landscape plans for the proposed raised landscaped medians on Nicolas Road shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services. 105. The developer shall enter into an improvement agreement and post securities for the landscaped median on Nicolas Road. R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-DraR.doc 16 106. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 107. The landscape median shall be completed, including the 90 day maintenance period, to TCSD standards. FIRE DEPARTMENT 108. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 109. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2250 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 3100 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III -A) 110. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-13-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on -site and off -site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B). 111. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on -site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 112. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 113. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 114. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Dratt.doc 17 an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) 115. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 116. The gradient for all fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) 117. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 118. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 119. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 120. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, 'Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 121. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi -family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi -family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and /or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 122. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 123. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) RAD P\2002\02-0364 Rodpaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Drakdoc 18 124. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser door. (CFC 902.4) 125. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 126. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 127. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high -piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high -piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) 128. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 129. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required (on a case by case basis as required) to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA —13, 24, 72 and 231-C. 130. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 131. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 132. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso DP-Draft.doc 19 OUTSIDE AGENCIES 133. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 22, 2004 from the Army Corps of Engineers. 134. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 26, 2002 from the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. 135. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 15, 2003 from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. 136. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 4, 2003 from the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA). 137. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 22, 2004 from the Airport Land Use Commission of Riverside County. 138. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 30, 2003 from the Rancho California Water District. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Applicant's Printed Name Date RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso DP-Draft.doc 20 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O BOX 532711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325 PEPLY TO ATfENTx1N OF: June 22, 2004 Office of the Chief Regulatory Branch City of Temecula Planning Department Attention: Dan Long P.O. Box 9033 — Temecula, California 92589-9033"- Dear Mr. Long: It has comelmour attenti6nthat-you4ilanto coristntct-160;860 square feet of commercial space on 20.2 acres located on the southeast comer of Nicholas Rd. and Winchester Rd near Gertrudis Creek in the city of Temecula, Riverside County, California. This activity may require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit. A Corps of Engineers permit is required for the discharge of dredged or fill material into, including any redeposit of dredged material within, "waters of the United States" and adjacent wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972. Examples include, but are not limited to, 1. creating fills for residential or commercial development, placing bank protection, temporary or permanent stockpiling of excavated material, building road crossings, backfilling for utility line crossings and constructing outfall structures, dams, levees, groins, weirs, or other structures; 2. mechanized landclearing, grading which involves filling low areas or land leveling, ditching, channelizing and other excavation activities that would have the effect of destroying or degrading waters of the United States; 3. allowing nuioff or overflow from a contained land or water disposal area to re-enter a water of the United States; 4. placing pilings when such placement has or would have the effect of a discharge of fill material. -2- Enclosed you will find a permit application form and a pamphlet that describes our regulatory program. If you have any questions, please contact me at (213) 452-3418. Please refer to this letter and 200401337-CLM in your reply. Sincerely, Crystal L. Marquez Project Manager Enclosures COUNTY OF IUVMSIDE • HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH July 26, 2002 City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 RE: Development Plan No. PA02-0364 Dear Thomas Thomsley: The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Development Plan No. PA02-0364 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. 1. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the following items are required: a) "Will -serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330). c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055 will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: ♦ Underground storage tanks, Ordinance 4617.4. ♦ Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3. ♦ Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2. ♦ Waste Reduction Management Sincerely, Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Health Specialist (909)955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials 4065 County Circle Drive • Riverside, CA 92503 • Phone (909) 358.5316 • FAX (909) 358.5017 (Mailing Address — P.O. Box 7600 • Riverside, CA 92513.7600) WARREN D. WILLIAMS °�oexnnca General Manager -Chief Engineer rAT RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Thomas Thomsley Ladies and Gentlemen: August 15, 2003 Re: PA02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909.955.1200 909.788.9965 FAX 83853.1 The District does not usually review land divisions/land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters/flood hazard reports for projects that are located within incorporated Cities. Exceptions are made for cases with items of specific interest to the -District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issues. PA02-0364 is a proposal to design and construct a commercial center totaling 171,200 square feet on a 20.2 acre site located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Winchester and Nicolas Roads within the City of Temecula. The entire site is located within the Zone C boundary as delineated on Panel No. 0602453335D (panel not printed) of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid for by cashier's check or money order written to Flood Control District prior to the issuance of building or grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. The following information of a general nature is provided herewith for your use: • This project may need to obtain an applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coverage from the State Water Resources Control Board or the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) — San Diego Region. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determinedthat tt project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. !p Ii AUG 2 1 2003 '1 IJ� RV 83953.1 City of Temecula -2- August 15, 2003 Re: PA02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center • If the mapped flood plain is impacted by the project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the RWQCB — San Diego Region prior to issuance of the Corps 404 Permit. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Teresa Tung at 909.955.4050. Very truly yours, STEPHEN C. THOMAS Senior Civil Engineer TT:pin Riverside Transit Agerra, 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside, CA 92517-1968 Phone: (909)565.5000 Fax: (909) 565.5001 August 4,2003 Mr. Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner Planning Dept. City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: PA02-0364 (resubmittal), Rancho Temecula Town Center — RTA Comments Dear Mr: Thornsley: Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the proposed retail center at the north- easterly corner of State Highway 79 North (Winchester Rd) and Nicholas Rd. A copy of the RTA staff review memo regarding the project is attached. Existing RTA bus routes 23 and 79 pre- sently serve the project site and more routes are anticipated to serve Highway79 in the future. The proposed local transit Harveston Shuttle will likely also serve this shopping center. Riverside Transit Agency advises that we find the overall project design generally acceptable. However, to encourage and enhance future transit use in this vicinity, RTA recommends a condi- tion of approval requiring the following transit amenities be included on a revised site plan or street improvement plan: "A paved, lighted, RTA-standard and ADA-compliant bus turnout and bus stop, with space for related -amenities -shall -be -indicated along -the -east -side of State Highway 749 - North, approximately adjacent to the northwest comer of building "Major H", or half the way between the SH79-Nicolas intersection and the first "W7" driveway entry". Information note: Sufficient right-of-way appears available for a turnout without significant removal of sidewalks or required landscaping and with minimum disturbance of existing trees or utility structures. The RTA Best Practices Design Guide calls for bus turnouts to be positioned after, or down the street, from major intersections, depending on the direc- tion of traffic. The 'related amenities" for the bus stop should incorporate a paved pas- senger waiting area and adequate space for future installation of bus rider benches, shelters and bus route signage by RTA, the City or their designee. Thank you for considering this revision. If you need additional clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (909) 565-5164 or contact me online at mmccoK@riversidetransit. com. Sincere Michael McCoy AUG 0 5 2003 Senior Planner F:\data\PlanningWikeM\Word\Dev Review\Temecu1a\2003\RTA llrhd - RchTemecTownCtr AIRPORT LAND USE C RIVERSIDE COUNTY,it F i.I JUL L 6 C':;04 July 22, 2004 City of Temecula, Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attn: Daniel Long RE: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION (ALUC) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Fite No.: FV-04-104 Related File: PA02-0364 APN #: 920-100-001 thru 920-100-013 Dear Applicant: Simon Housman Random"e On July 15, 2004, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) found the M2, nd Tandy above -referenced project consistent with the French Valley Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP), subject to the conditions of approval: Sam Pntt Temecula 1. Provide Avigation Easements to the French Valley Airport prior to sale of any Mar" u9huer property to any entity exempt from the Subdivision Map Act, prior to recordation of Hemet any map, or issuance of any permit, whichever is first. STAFF Keith D.Downs 2. The attached Notice shall be given to each prospective buyer or tenant. Executive Director A.I.C.P., AAA.E 3 No obstruction of the "FAR Part 77 Conical Surface" shall be permitted. SSSSNb4mke. RheW rA 9PSW Tdp)x�sjr, 4. Install hooded or shielded outdoor lighting to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky (lights must be downward facing). Websik: ww1sGGU3 15. The following uses shall be prohibited: a. Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA -approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. b. Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. July 22, 2004 Page 2 of 2 C. Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor orwhich would attract a large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. d. Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to any operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. 6. No above ground storage of flammable materials shall be allowed. Should you have any questions regarding this action, please contact me at (951) 343- 5493. Sincerely, RIVERSIDE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION C-9 � Keith D. Down , A.I.C.P., A.A.A.E. Executive Director KDD-jg Attachments: Notice of Airport in Proximity cc: ALUC Staff Mathew Fagan F-.kMaredlEDCOMWIRPORTS%LUCTrench Va1ey\FV-04.104.LTR..doc V p 0 d o >1 N O _ cn m 0 N 0 C -+� >, O (� � to Q Q N -U� � � �4- � VQ N Cl)N .. N IMM-> 0 .0 M :� 0 cn O O L- •tn Q. 0 C p M r- C C '� 0 C O >, >, O a •- (u >, a)N 0 N N C - L LZ. O O (6 0 t6 ) -� 0 vcQ.0(u-0a)t. )v QZ o� L-o.>0o>�C 0. LL V o — O�pL. a)Cn V w cu > 0 > 0 >N M Q. 4. C L p -p C o � •� oZS >, 0 -0 C/) ~ -�a)� cbC 0 x L) C.) a) C/) a. — Z � .o �._�.o cn •� •> m •� m ° C- >, July 30, 2003 ad VAUG 2003 llil�W Thomas Thomsley, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Board ofDirerlors 43200 Business Park Drive J.HreF t- HinuOe Post Office Box 9033 President John L HoaBiand Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Sr. via President Stephen J. Coma SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY Ralph a D•BF PARCELS NO. i THROUGH NO. 13 OF PARCEL MAP Ban R: Drdu NO.26232-1; APN 920-100-001 THROUGH APN 920-100-013 Li" D. Herman RORIPAUGH TOWN CENTER Caaha F. Ro Dear Mr. Thornsley: Mats Jahn F. Hennisar Please advised--that--tire—above-referenced—property-is—located-within-the General Manager PhiIBP L ForMa boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, Dirado,eft'ee'°e- therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements Treasurer R.P.'Boh• Lemons between RCWD and the property owner and the construction of all require on- D1 of eog1°0`f1 a site and/or off -site water facilities. Beoneth C. Deady Dvermr of OPentboa A Malntenaaa If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees Perry R Louck and requirements. Cenwller L"" M. Fre(oao Distrfet$erretary1Adaitdatrative Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an S.M. Manager Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. C. Miehad Co�ett Bat Bed i Mager LLP a°°r.lc°noel If You should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager OWMal I83T012= r6\FCF Rancho Calif.." Water Dimriet 42135 Wtnehestar Bead a Pat 0(r.. Bee 9017 • Teaeeda. Cdifomia M89-N17 1909) 29"M- FAX(909) M-68W ATTACHMENT NO. 6 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 04-_ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 11 RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0540, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING A TOTAL OF FOUR DRIVE -THROUGH FACILITIES WITHIN A RELATED DEVELOMENT PLAN (PA02-0364) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 162,860 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, KNOWN AS APN: 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Pacific Development Partners, LLC, filed Planning Application Nos. PA02-0360, General Plan Amendment; PA02-0363, Specific Plan Amendment; PA02-0364, Development Plan; PA02-0365, Tentative Parcel Map, and PA04-0540, Conditional Use Permit, for the property consisting of approximately 20.2 acres generally located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 ('Project'). B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on October 20, 2004 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental review, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-056 recommending approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Project; Resolution No. 2004-057 recommending the City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 2004-058 recommending the City Council approval of a Specific Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 2004-059 recommending the City Council approval of a Tentative Parcel Map; and Resolution No. 2004-060 recommending the City Council approval of a Development Plan; E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-061 recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit; F. On , 2004 and Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity these matters. 2004, the City hearing on the Project at which time and did address the City Council on RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso CUP-Draft.doc G. On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 04-_; approving a General Plan Amendment, Resolution No. 04- _; approving a Specific Plan Amendment, Ordinance No. 04-_; approving a Tentative Parcel Map, Resolution No. 04-_ ; and approving a Development Plan Resolution No. 04-_ H. On , 2004, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Conditional Use Permit for the Project when it approved Resolution No. 04- Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. The Project, including the Development Plan, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Project, including the Development Plan, has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. B. The Project, including the Development Plan, is compatible with surrounding land uses. C. The Project, including the Development Plan, will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The Project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site and represents a relocation of existing land uses. Section 3. The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code A. The proposal, a request for four drive -through facilities, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan, the land use standards in the General Plan and the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the proposed use. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures because the project site is a commercial use on commercially zoned land. The building is designed to enhance the surrounding area and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. C. The conditional use is a request for four drive -through facilities on commercially zoned land. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed drive -through facilities without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code. D. The proposed Conditional Use Permit includes a request for four drive -through facilities. The nature of this use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of R:\D P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso CUP-Draft.doc the community because the proposed project is providing a service that is needed in the surrounding community and it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts, including health, safety and general welfare to the community. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA04-0540) to allow for a total of four drive -through facilities within a related Development Plan (PA02-0364) consisting of approximately 162,860 square feet of retail commercial space, located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 subject to the specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of 2004 Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 04 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the `h day of 2004, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso CUP-Draft.doc EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center\CC Reso CUP-Draft.doc EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA04-0540 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit allowing a total of four drive - through facilities within a related Development Plan (PA02-0364) consisting of approximately 162,860 square feet of retail commercial space, located on the northeast corner of Winchester road and Nicolas road, known as Assessors Parcel Numbers 920-100-001 through 920-100-013 DIF: TUMF: MSHCP: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Retail Commercial Retail Commercial Retail Commercial November 5, 2003 November 5, 2005 Within Forty -Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a check or money order made payable to the Riverside County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty -Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso CUP-Dratt.doc Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 4. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 6. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated September 30, 2004, (attached) on file with the Planning Department, unless superceded by these conditions of approval. 7. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 8. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. If future tenants request the sales of alcohol, a separate conditional use permit shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission. 9. The applicant shall submit a separate development plan application to review the architecture, hardscape and landscaping for each drive -through facility. The Drive - through lane (pads K and L) shall be screened with a structural component, the length of the building and include landscaped berms. 10. All drive -through lanes, including service windows shall be adequately screened, subject to approval by the Planning Director. POLICE DEPARTMENT 11. All exterior lighting surrounding the project site should be energy -saving and minimized after closing hours of business to comply with the State of California Lighting Ordinance. Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting Requirements. 12. All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed. RAD Pt2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso CUP-Draft.doc 13. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 14. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings shall be removed or painted over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police Department immediately so a report can be taken. 15. Upon completion of construction, the interior of this facility shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the police department immediately of any intrusion. All multi -tenant buildings located within the center should have their own alarm system. 16. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 17. Any public telephones located on the exterior of this facility should be placed in a well - lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of this facility. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Signature Applicant Printed Name Date RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Reso CUP-Draft.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT (OCTOBER 20, 2004) RAD P\200=2-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 12 ATTACHMENT NO.8 EXCERPT FROM DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES (OCTOBER 20, 2004) RAD P12002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 13 DRAFT EXCERPT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 20, 2004 (Item No. 6) PUBLIC HEARING 1)R,gr r Land Use Designation from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC): a Specific Plan Amendment to change the Specific Plan land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC) for Planning Area 9 in four drive -through businesses, located at the southeast corner of Highway 79 North (Winchester Road) and Nicolas Road Associate Planner Long presented the Planning Commission with a staff report (of record), noting the following: • That the proposed project would include a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, a Development Plan and a CUP, and a Tentative Parcel Map • That the proposed project will be located on the north/east corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road • That the General Plan Amendment is a request to amend the Land Use Designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial (CC) • That the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) reviewed the request in Spring of 2002 and was in favor of the proposed request • That the request would be consistent with the related General Plan Amendment request • That the text amendment provides language that allows three access points onto the project site from the public right-of-way; that the current SP allows for two access points; and that the City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the request and issued Conditions of Approval • That the Tentative Parcel Map is a request to subdivide 20.2 acres into 12 acres R:\MinutesPC\102004 • That the Development Plan is a request for 162,000 square feet of retail and commercial uses which include four drive-throughs which is a request for the CUP • That staff has worked with the applicant on various architectural themes and designs; and that staff has added a Condition of Approval (No. 15) requiring decorative window sills and/or window surrounds for select second -story windows subject to the approval of the Planning Director • That Major E which is being proposed to be an L.A. Fitness, does not blend with the architecture of the overall center; and that staff has included Condition of Approval (Nos. 13 and 14) that require Major E to blend with the shopping center as a whole (architecturally, materials and colors) • That a total of four drive -through businesses are proposed; that staff is of the opinion that the drive -through facilities nearest Winchester Road should be further screened; that while the applicant has provided berming with landscaping, staff is of the opinion that the drive -through windows should include a covered structure over the window to appear as a structural component of the buildings; and that in addition, landscape berming should meander and be at a height that adequately screens the drive -through lanes and parking and that staff has included a Condition of Approval (No. 34) requiring a structural component over the drive -through window for pads K and L. • That staff is of the opinion that the architecture for Major H warrants four-sided architecture; that the elevations of concern are the north and east elevation; that the east elevation includes the loading zone and the north elevation could use some architectural elements • That the applicant is in disagreement with some of the conditions in regard to landscaping that revolves around the focal points and entry into the plaza; and that conditions of concern are: Nos. 28, 29, 30 on the Development Plan • That staff would request to omit Condition of Approval No. 9 of the Development Plan which requires landscaping in the rear • That Condition of Approval No. 17 be revised to read: verification that landscape plans have been submitted to Caltrans prior to issuance of building permits and must be installed prior to certificate of occupancy which would allow the applicant some flexibility • That staff is requesting that the language referring to: a low wall, be deleted in Condition of Approval No. 33 • That staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and that staff has received numerous phone calls and emails from the Cultural Heritage Committee (submitted this evening to PC), but there has been no written correspondence • That the neighboring property, Ms. June Tool, has provided staff with an email expressing her concern with turning movements into her property south of the proposed site RAMinutesPC\1020D4 • The Deputy of Public Works Parks will be available to answer any questions regarding the design of the median • That it has been confirmed that there will be a left turning access to enter the center • That other issues that were identified in the environmental document include air quality, geology, soil, and noise; and that those issues have been reduced to a less than significant impact with the Mitigation measures in place • That in regard to traffic, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way on Nicolas Road for an eventual right-hand turn lane and that the applicant will also be required to restripe the intersection to allow dual left-hand turn motion from Nicolas onto westbound Winchester Road; and that this will be required to install a landscape median along Nicolas Road and install a signal 750 feet away from Winchester Road • That staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration, a Mitigation Monitoring Program, approve the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Development Plan, and CUP with the revised conditions mentioned above. For staff, Commissioner Chiniaeff queried on what the applicant would be proposing to do with the back sides of shops D-east elevation, Major E, east/south elevation, and Major B, west elevation. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Long responded that staff has not addressed in detail, the rears of shops D east elevation, Major E east/south elevation, and Major B, west elevation. Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that it is his opinion that the Planning Commission has clearly expressed, on more than one occasion, the concerns of man -doors in rears of buildings. Commissioner Chiniaeff also relayed that because the proposed project is on a major intersection of the community, he is of the opinion that a drug -store should not be a major entry into the center. Commissioner Chiniaeff also expressed concern with the color scheme of the L.A. Fitness and queried if the applicant would be willing to work with staff to find architecture/colors that would blend better with the surrounding buildings. Mr. Long relayed that he will defer Commissioner Chiniaeff's concerns regarding architecture and color scheme to the applicant, Mr. Mark Burger. Commissioner Chiniaeff also expressed concern with the proposed round -about; advising that it is his opinion that the round -about would not serve its purpose due to its small size, noting that it could cause confusion for drivers and would rather see a round design on the asphalt. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Long relayed that the request to amend the Land Use Designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial was discussed with and supported by the General Plan Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). RAMinutesPQ102004 For Commissioner Mathewson, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that due to the fact that Winchester Road is a major Road and due to the size of the parcel being 20 acres, it was the opinion of the CAC that it would be more appropriate for that particular area to be Community Commercial versus Neighborhood Commercial. For Chairman Telesio, Mr. Long noted that the proposed design for the L.A. Fitness is its prototype. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Mark Burger, founder and owner of Pacific Development Partners, offered the following: • That Pacific Development Partners has developed 70 to 75 projects throughout the Western United States, the vast majority in California • That Pacific Development Partners has developed multi -family, industrial, hotel, and mixed -use office and retail; and that the vast majority have been retail • That the applicant has been working with staff for over two years and he understands that the proposed project would be at a major intersection of the community • That the applicant has explored the different ways in which to make the site work; noting that there are certain things that are fixed on the site such as the three -driveways • That after exploring the possible uses for the site, it was determined that Community Commercial would be most appropriate on this site • That the applicant focused on obtaining tenants that are currently not in Temecula and that would be a benefit and complementary to what is currently established in the community • That in terms of a tenant lease, Rite Aid, L.A. Fitness, Henry's Market Place, are all signed leases and would be considered a major tenant • That Beverages and More will be a major tenant as well • That there will also be a Nary Federal Credit Union on Pad J • That all the above mentioned tenants will be an excellent tenant mix and one that currently does not currently exist in the City today • That the tenant Beverages and More will be 10,000 square feet and will feature wines from different wineries; and that they will also feature wine from the Temecula Valley as well as hold wine tasting events • That high quality finishes will be added as well as a special wet feature in the corner which will create a pedestrian atmosphere • That the entire team for the proposed project is available to answer any questions and address any concerns the Commission may have RAMinutesPC\1020D4 4 For Mr. Burger, Commissioner Chiniaeff queried if the applicant would be able to add landscaping along the edge of the creek bed to break-up the expanse on the back side of Henry's Market Place. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Burger noted that he would be happy to add some type of landscaping behind Henry's Market Place to help break up the massing. Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that the applicant relocate the exterior man -ladders where it would be less visible to the public such as between Major B and Building C. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Burger noted that as long as it is not a problem with the Fire Department, he would be happy to relocate the exterior man -doors. For Commissioner Chiniaeff and Commissioner Olhasso, Mr. Burger relayed that he will explore the possibility of softening the corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road (Rite -Aid) by pulling the landscaping toward the building. Mr. Burger relayed that the proposed drug -store (Rite -Aid), will be a convenient drug -store to a fairly significant senior population in the area. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Burger noted that he would also be willing to screen the drive- throughs with some type of landscaped wall. Commissioner Chiniaeff reiterated his concern with the round -about. Mr. Burger responded that the round -about was the suggestion of staff and removing it or enlarging it at this time, would cause a significant impact on the center; but that if is the will of the Commission, the applicant would be willing to install a special surface treatment around it. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Burger relayed that he does not have the percentages of sales for the drug -store drive -through. Mr. Burger also relayed that he understands his desire for a life-style entertainment center, but that because the project site is on a highway oriented site, this site would not be ideal for that type of center. Mr. Burger reiterated that in February 2005, it will have been five (5) years that the applicant has been working on this project and it is his opinion that he has come up with the best possible architecture design for the proposed site; advising that he is aware that the proposed site is on a very strategic location. He also noted that he will be happy to add landscaping to help screen the rears of the above mentioned elevations. Commissioner Mathewson noted his appreciation for the proposed project and queried on the drive -through at the drug -store. Mr. Burger relayed that the drive -through for the drug -store would not be a huge traffic generator but could possibly be a big sales generator and that it is the intent for all drug -stores to have drive-throughs. RAMinutesPC\102004 G Commissioner Olhasso commented on the hard surfaces and lack of landscaping on Pad F and queried if the applicant could soften this area. In response to Commissioner Olhasso, Mr. Zaich, representing L.A. Fitness responded that he would be willing to work with staff to articulate the building further with architectural elements and add landscaping features that could soften the face of the building as well as adding landscaping. Mr. Vincent Didonado, landscape architect representing the applicant offered the following comments: • That he is willing to add landscaping and articulation to soften the wall on the southside of Pad F For Commissioner Olhasso, Ms. Ubnoske added that a condition could be incorporated that states that more landscaping be added in front of Pad M. Mr. Long clarified that there is a condition that currently states that the applicant will need to return for a separate development plan subject to administrative approval which will blend with the overall center. Mr. Peruzzi, architect representing the applicant offered the following comments: • That most drug -stores demand 2 to 4 rows, 60 cars parking in their front entry • That the drug -store building has migrated closer to the corner; that the orientation to the entryway is toward the corner to create the pedestrian crossway and a corner feature element • That the applicant could add more architectural elements and change the hardscape from as asphalt to a stamped concrete feature. Commissioner Olhasso responded that she concurs with Mr. Peruzzi's above mentioned comments. Commissioner Guerriero relayed that the proposed site is the last significant corner and would like to see something that brings Wine Country into the architecture and also some trellis work; and that he is of the opinion that there are lots of avenues that can be explored to add enhancements, other than just a wall, trees, and flowers. For Commissioner Guerriero responded that his comments are well taken and he would be - willing to add a trellis which will enhance the corner area and that the design of the sign could be modified. Mr. Burger relayed that the fountain feature will create a gathering point in the middle of the center. At this time, the Planning Commission convened for a five minute break. The Commission expressed concern with the back sides of Major H, east elevation. RAMinutesPM102004 6 Mr. Dedonado offered the following comments: • That the wall around the Santa Gertrudis Creek will be heavily screened with pepper trees, evergreens, and some deciduous color which will help soften the wall • That he would also be willing to add landscaping to the back side of Major H • That he could soften the eastern elevation with planted -on arches along the fagade. Mr. Burger relayed that he would be happy to mitigate the Planning Commissions concerns regarding the east elevation of Major H. Mr. Dedonado expressed concern with Condition of Approval No. 30. In response to Mr. Dedonado's concern, Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that Condition of Approval No. 30 could be modified to read: the tree installation along the building will be approved by the Planning Director. Mr. Dedonado concurred with Commissioner Chiniaeff's comment regarding Condition of Approval No. 30. Mr. Burger noted that he will work with staff in regards to Condition of Approval No. 29. Commissioner Mathewson queried on Pads K and L. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Burger responded that Pads K and L are proposed to be restaurants; and that one pad will be an Archibald's which is a sit-down and drive -through restaurant. Commissioner Mathewson expressed concern with drive-throughs for Pads K and L and noted that he would prefer to have restaurants without drive-throughs. For the Commission, Mr. Burger responded that all he has worked hard to attract the most unique tenant mix and that the applicant is of the opinion that he has done a great job in achieving that. Mr. Burger also ensured the Commission that he will be notifying the tenants that they are to use architectural elements that will blend in with the overall center and reiterate the architectural standards that they must uphold. Mr. Fagan, representing the applicant ensured the Commission that the applicant's intent would be to create a high quality center that meets the architectural standards that the Commission upholds and respectfully requests approval of the proposed project. Mr. Greg Krzy's, Temecula resident, noted his excitement for the proposed project but expressed concern with traffic and preparation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and any issues related to biological impacts to the proximity to Santa Gertrudis Creek. For Mr. Krzy's, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, offered the following comments: RAM1nutesPC\102004 7 • That the proposed project has been evaluated from a traffic standpoint and that the LOS at the intersection of Diaz Road is currently at an E or F • That the Roripaugh Ranch SP has been conditioned to improve the intersection of Nicolas and Winchester Road to the ultimate configuration which will include a triple left from Nicolas onto Winchester, a dedicated right -turn, and one -through lane from Nicolas straight across • That the concerns addressed by Mr. Krzy's have been addressed and are conditioned with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (S)P and is part of the CFD for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP) • That the proposed project cannot be conditioned based upon the conditions of Roripaugh Ranch • That staff requested that the applicant for Roripaugh Ranch mitigate their impact, which will be a dedicated right-of-way necessary to complete the ultimate intersection from their property which includes an additional 14 feet along Nicolas Road or variation of that and some additional widening on Winchester Road • That in addition, staff has required the developer prior to occupancy (see COA No. 32), improve Winchester Road, improve Nicolas Road, dedicate right-of-way, install a traffic signal, and improve the intersection at Winchester Road and Nicolas Road, including a signal modification for the westbound Nicolas Road approach to provide two left -turn lanes, one through lane, and one right -turn land which will reduce the LOS at this intersection to D or better through the period of its occupancy. For Mr. Krzy's, Mr. Long clarified that when the project was submitted in 2002, the Department of Wild Life and Fish and Game and Army Corps of Engineers submitted their comments and Conditions of Approval which are currently set in place. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staffs recommendation with the following changes: • That landscaping and architectural elements be addressed at the drug -store (Rite Aid) • That L.A. Fitness modify their architecture to blend with the overall architecture of the center and that landscaping be added to soften the appearance of the back elevation • That the applicant work with staff to enhance the corner monument • That the wall near the Santa Gertrudis Creek be enhanced • That plantings on the round -about be eliminated • That staff ensure that the Pads K and L blend in with the architecture of the center • That architectural treatment be added to the drive-throughs, preferably eliminating them but not required • That a paving treatment be added around the round -about • That staff work with the applicant in regard to the number of trees per space • That Condition of Approval No. 33 modified • That Condition of Approval No. 9 be deleted • That staff work with the applicant on Condition of Approval No. 28 RAMinutesPC\102004 • That the ladders that are visible be relocated to a less visible area • That the Public Works Condition of Approval Nos. 77a, 77c, 44, and 32 be revised, (see staff report) • That Public Works Condition of Approval No. 32b be added, (see staff report) At this time, the Public Hearing was reopened. Mr. Zaich reiterated that he will meet with staff and the Planning Director and will articulate the L.A. Fitness building with more architectural elements. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval. RAMinutesPC\102004 ATTACHMENT NO.9 PLAN REDUCTIONS RAD Pt2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 14 ! # � ! ! -ig / ) . w&a2m ;2 ( H§ 1� \|k k ! |\ | !)a || u: n:gnn eee till? #!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ) � q,l..;.l..l,.... R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! § \ k »�: (2, �d� e a . aeDI. » .� VA oz- a� TS �I � mm ! j ! | } ! | ! !•l.J,CO ; # R ; � # \ �` \ �` §(/\o0000000 0 i Ilk i i t-j Hii $ ! .- b I I I I 9 gaajsoo s„ t W = Uw 15X: 3 R w ''. i-U o x U Q Ir )NM f�j 1 AI a . . iE s .� t lit� N ATTACHMENT NO. 10 PUBLIC COMMENTS AND STAFF RESPONSE TO PROJECT AND INITIAL STUDY RAD P\2002\02-0364 Roripaugh Town Center= Staff Report-1.doc 15 Public Comments a Staff Response for Rancho Temecula Town Center, located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road Project Title: Planning Applications Nos. PA02-0360 a General Plan Amendment; PA02-0363, Specific Plan Amendment; PA02-0364 Development Plan; PA02-0365 Tentative Parcel Map; and PA04-0540 Conditional Use Permit Comment 1: Sent via email: The Roripaugh Family Trust is the owner of parcels 920-100-017,18,19, which border the property that is the subject of this hearing. The Roripaugh Family Trust is the owner of parcels 920-100-032, 025,026,030, which are located across Nicolas Road from the Pacific Development project. These are located behind the Arco station facing frontage roads along both Wlnchester and Nicolas Roads. It is imperative that our properties be accessible by traffic traveling both ways on Nicolas Road . This is an economic as well as a safety issue for us. Travelers must be able to safely enter and leave our properties. Drivers making left turns from Nicolas need the protection of either a traffic light or at the least, a designated left turn waiting pocket to access entrances to our properties. To minimize driver frustration the signal and/or turn pockets would be as far back from the main intersection of Winchester and Nicolas as possible. Please provide me with a map showing planned traffic flow for this project. The seven parcels mentioned above will be developed eventually. Their future accessibility must be assured by traffic planners in this phase of development. If I can be of assistance or answer questions, please call. Thank you, June R. Tull, Trustee, Roripaugh 1975 Trust 1995 Monte Vista Dr. Palmer, AK 99645 Telephone (907)745-2854 Fax (907)746-2853 Staff Response 1: Staff has met with Ms. Tull and has provided adequate information regarding the location of the new signal on Nicolas Road, which is required as part of the mitigation measures and a median required to be constructed along Nicolas Road the length of the project site and up to Roripaugh Road. Ms. Tull is the trustee of the property located to the south and to the east of the project site. The required signal will provide a left turn opportunity onto Nicolas Road from this property. The property to the south will also maintain access to and from Nicolas Road. A median is required to be extended to Roripaugh Road, which provides primary ingress and egress to the parcels to the south The final design of the median is not complete at this time, however the Public Works Department has assured that a left turn pocket will be provided at this location. Comment 2: During the public comment period portion of the Planning Commission hearing on October 20, 2004, Mr. Greg Krzys brought two areas of concern; traffic and biology. Mr Krzys felt that the traffic study did not adequately address cumulative traffic impacts from the other projects in the area. In addition, he felt the initial study failed to address biological concerns to the creek. Staff Response 2: During the Planning Commission hearing, Mr. Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works responded to the traffic comments. Per CEOA, the project is not required to mitigate for impacts from other projects. For example, the developer cannot be held accountable for the impacts from the Roripaugh Ranch project. The project was therefore conditioned in a manner that mitigates all impacts as a result of the project as a stand-alone project with the existing development taken into consideration. The applicant was required to dedicate right-of-way, which will provide the ultimate width for future improvements such as Roripaugh Ranch as well as other mitigations that mitigate the potential significant impacts of the proposed project to a less than significant level. In regards to the biological issue, staff has walked the site and has determined that the project site does not include any sensitive habitat. The project site has been disturbed with grading and removal of vegetation numerous times. Staff has verified that the project site is not located within a criteria cell of the Multi -habitat Species Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and therefore is not required to initiate any further biological studies. In addition, the application and the initial study were sent to the state and federal agencies, including California Department of Fish and Game and U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife Service. Staff received no comments from either of these agencies or any other public or private agency regarding biological issues. Comment 3: Staff received a letter from Carol Gaubatz of the Native American Heritage Commission with concerns of potential discovery and treatment of historical and cultural resources (see attached letter). Staff Response 3: Staff has included mitigation measures and conditions of approval, which address the discovery and treatment of historic and cultural resources. VED: 10/19/04 12:13PM; ->CITY OF TEMECULA; N551 PAGE 1 a1AUQEQ8l.1EQRNlA NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION — 915 CAPITOL MALL. ROOM 364 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916) 6SS4082 (916) 657.6M- Fax October 19, 2004 Mr. Dan Long City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Draft EIR; Planning Applications Nos. PA02-0362, a General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Amendment and PA02-0364, a Conditional Use PermitrDevelopment Plan SCH# 2004091110 Dear Mr. Long: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above -referenced document The Commission was able to perform a record search of its Sacred Lands File for the project area, which failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. The absence of specific site information in the Sacred Lands File does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area_ Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites. We understand that a records search through your regional Information Centers and consultation with Native Americans in the vicinity have been conducted. Lads of surface evidence of archeological resources does not preclude the existence of such resources at a given location. Lead agencies should include provisions for accidentally discovered archeological resources and cemeteries during construction per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code §15064.5 (f). Both Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and Public Resources Code §W97.98 mandate the procedures to be followed in the event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery and should be included in all environmental documents. If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 653-6251. Sincerely, Carol Gaubatz Program Analy Cc: State Clearinghouse Page 1 of 1 Dan Long From: junetull Dunetull@mtaonline.net] Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 12:40 PM To: Dan Long Cc: Jack and Leslie Roripaugh; Chris Manes Subject: Roripaugh commercial parcels: left turn access from Nicolas Rd City of Temecula Planning Commission Attention: Dan Long regarding Planning Application No. PA02-0364 and PA02-0362 applicant: Pacific Development Partners, LLC, Southeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road Date of Hearing, October 20, 2004: The Roripaugh Family Trust is the owner of parcels 920-100-017,18,19, which border the property that is the subject of this hearing. The Roripaugh Family Trust is the owner of parcels 920-100-032, 025,026,030, which are located across Nicolas Road from the Pacific Development project. These are located behind the Arco station facing frontage roads along both Winchester and Nicolas Roads. It is imperative that our properties be accessible by traffic traveling both ways on Nicolas Road . This is an economic as well as a safety issue for us. Travelers must be able to safely enter and leave our properties. Drivers making left turns from Nicolas need the protection of either a traffic light or at the least, a designated left turn waiting pocket to access entrances to our properties. To minimize driver frustration the signal and/or turn pockets would be as far back from the main intersection of Winchester and Nicolas as possible. Please provide me with a map showing planned traffic flow for this project. The seven parcels mentioned above will be developed eventually. Their future accessibility must be assured by traffic planners in this phase of development. If I can be of assistance or answer questions, please call. Thank you, June R. Tull, Trustee, Roripaugh 1975 Trust 1995 Monte Vista Dr. Palmer, AK 99645 Telephone (907)745-2854 Fax(907)746-2853 10/29/2004 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN E CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during October 2004. The Police Department responded to 61 "priority one" calls for service during the month of October, with an average response time of approximately 5.8 minutes. A total of 4,559 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During October, the Temecula Police Department's Old Town Storefront served a total of 297 customers. Eighty sets of fingerprints were taken, 31 people filed police reports and eight people had citations signed off. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events, neighborhood watch and community -oriented programs during the month. He also coordinated requests for patrol ride-alongs and conducted police station tours. Additionally, he continued to provide residential and business security surveys/visits and past crime follow-up. Officer Fanene also continued to process City Planning Department submissions of site plans/conditions. During October, the POP Teams continued their problem oriented policing approach of areas within the community and made 10 felony and four misdemeanor arrests for various crimes. The function of the POP Teams is to address situations that typically require extended enforcement action or certain expertise in order to solve an on -going problem within a neighborhood. The POP Teams also continued working with the homeless by assisting them in relocation efforts whenever possible and appropriate. The POP Teams stepped up enforcement again in the area of Sam Hicks Park, which has been the site for a number of homeless related complaints by the public. Additionally, the POP Team was responsible for conducting nightly surveillance in the business districts of Temecula. Members of the POP Team also began establishing gang database information, and assisted the Investigations Unit with the service of several search warrants on child pornography cases. The traffic team reported that during the month of October there were 696 citations issued for hazardous violations, 89 citations were issued for non -hazardous violations and 140 parking citations were issued. During the month there were three injury traffic collisions, 48 non -injury collisions were reported and 15 drivers were arrested for DUI. In other citation summary information, the Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in 131 citations being Monthly Departmental Report— Police Department issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The SLAP (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in at least 310 citations being issued. During the month of October, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 50 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the month, calls and on -sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on five felony and 19 misdemeanor cases. Officers Joyner and Rahn continued to provide training to security staff during the month. The mall officers continued to work to prevent vehicle theft and vehicle burglaries. There were no vehicle thefts and two vehicle burglaries reported during the month of October at the mall. Our five school resource officers have remained active during October, with the beginning of the school year. The school resource officers conducted many counseling sessions with students. A total of 95 investigations/reports were conducted/written by the school resource officers during October. The school resource officers made felony arrests for illegal/dangerous weapons on campus, and a misdemeanor arrest for indecent exposure. The school resource officers are also working hard to quell racial tensions at Chaparral High School. The YAT program (Youth Accountability Team) continues to be a success in part through its Youth Court program. The YAT officer assisted at other schools when needed and conducted follow-ups with parents of juveniles in the program. Officer Medeiros also worked with "at risk" juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. She assisted the Riverside County District Attorney's Office and Probation Department by providing training during home visits with incorrigible/at risk juveniles during the month of October. Officer Medeiros is currently carrying a caseload of about 30 at -risk juveniles. During the month of October, the Special Enforcement Team (SET Team), consisting of Officers Jeff Fisher and James Kaffka, continued their narcotic enforcement efforts. Officers Fisher and Kaffka made five felony and one misdemeanor arrest for various crimes, including narcotic violations. Officers also recovered quantities of methamphetamine and marijuana during the month. The SET officers also made an important felony kidnapping arrest that potentially saved the life of the victim, who was located in the trunk of a suspect vehicle. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Lori Callahan and assistant coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 516 hours of service in October. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and telephone answering duties. Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program volunteers have continued their activities, patrolling the city for graffiti, conducting vacation residential checks and assisting patrol with special logistical needs and special events. Other duties these volunteers attend to are business checks and abandoned vehicles and traffic control. The goal of the program is high visibility, which prevents crime from occurring. CAP Team members contributed 94.5 hours of service to the community during the month of October. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 85 hours specifically on patrol in Temecula during October. Monthly Departmental Report — Police Department The Temecula Citizen Corps Program continued to make good progress during the month of October. The executive body, or the TCC Council, continued to hold their bi-weekly meetings at Station 84. During October there was a transition of police personnel assigned to the TCC. Lt. John Pingel and Officer Rachael Frost were replaced with Sergeant Dave Kondrit and Officer Morgan Griggs, respectively. There are high hopes and many indications that TCC will continue to grow and prosper within the community. During October the City of Temecula sponsored the Fall Old Time Car Show, the Race for the Cure and the Tractor Race. It was a busy month for special events, but all of these activities proceeded without any difficulty for law enforcement. There were no arrests at these events, and those attending seemed to enjoy the atmosphere. Monthly Departmental Report— Police Department TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager November 23, 2004 Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of October 2004. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Leads & Inquiries In the month of October, the City received 3 leads. Staff was contacted by Eric Altman, a broker, representing a client who would like to open a 30,000 sq. ft. bowling center in Temecula. Staff provided business and available site information to Mr. Altman. Staff provided available properties to a local boating company looking to expand its operations. Staff provided business and demographic information and a list of local software & software consulting companies to an individual in Sahuarita, AZ who is looking to open up a software consulting business in Temecula. Mayor Naggar prepared a letter to the Outdoor Channel congratulating them on The Outdoor Channel's debut on the Nasdaq National Market in September. A framed copy of the article with the Mayor's letter was presented to Andrew Dale, President & CEO, of the Outdoor Channel. Special Events Staff participated at the Temecula Chamber Business Showcase which was held on October 21st at The Promenade Mall. Temecula Planning, GIS, Fire, and City Manager's offices represented the City. The Temecula Citizen Core also had space located next to the City's exhibit space. Media/Outreach Materials Staff wrote the City article for the November Chamber of Commerce Newsletter announcing the upcoming Sheriff's K9 Trials and Public Safety Expo scheduled for November 6`h at Chaparral High School. C ITYMGR\ W OLMCKG\AUGUST'OOOE". REPT.00C Staff provided business data, project and demographic information to Paul Crosswhite of the Inland Empire Business Journal. An upcoming issue will contain a comprehensive look at Temecula. Staff is working closely with Dr. John Husing on updating the Temecula Demographic Community Profile. Meetings Staff attended the Economic Development Business Relations Committee Meeting on October Ph. Company contact reports included: Kuebler, Prudhomme & Company, Temecula Valley Drywall/Timberlake Painting, Financial Data Solutions, Inc. and Temecula Motor Sports. The EDC reported that they had followed up with Channell Corporation and all of their questions were resolved. There have been eight site visits completed in the fourth month of the fiscal year. Staff reported that Milgard was in the process of an expansion; a new golf store opened on So. Hwy. 79; Concordia University was having difficulty with completion of tenant improvements at their new office on Single Oak Drive; and new business buildings were under construction on Ridgepark Drive. Temecula staff met the new director of the Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) at March Air Reserve Base to discuss an FTZ designation with the city. Several meetings on the proposed Temecula hospital were held in October to discuss the hospital's site plan, architecture and agenda for meetings in November with Homeowner's Associations. Staff attended the Partners in Education Committee Meeting on October 4`h. The Career Pathways Workshop, job shadowing and 2004/05 projects were discussed. On October 121h, staff met with Mr. Westedt of CB Richard Ellis regarding commercial development opportunities in Temecula. On October 14th, staff met with representatives of the Eastern Municipal Water District to discuss possible locations in and near Temecula for the temporary storage of new motor vehicles, as well as the temporary storage of used vehicles awaiting shipment. The City has been working with its Automobile Dealers' Association to identify possible sites for this use. The Temecula Higher Education Campus Project Meetings were held on October 13`h and 27th. These are standing meetings which are attended by staff and developer AG Kading. On October 15`h, staff attended the joint meeting of the IRPP Policy/Technical 1-15 Working Groups in Escondido. CALTRANS has granted SANDAG $240,000 towards Phase II of this program. The group is considering using a portion of this money to pay a consultant in conjunction with a Riverside Economist to do an Employment Cluster Analysis and develop a methodological approach to identifying economic development "drivers" or clusters as well as look at business to business perspectives. This study was done in San Diego a few years ago and is in the process of being updated. This can be compared side by side to the study being proposed for SW Riverside County. In addition, the area of rail was discussed. Staff reported that the Temecula City Council has asked that as a part of Temecula's General Plan update to include a Transportation Element. Within this transportation element staff will explore vanpool/car pool transit opportunities as well as right -away corridors that may need to be preserved for future rail. Councilmember Washington and staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting on October 21st. New business items included: CITYMGR\WOLMCKGUUGUST'OOOEPf.REP .D n • The EDC made a $2,400 contribution to Team 1079 for an upcoming national robotics competition that the local high schools will participate in. • The EDC Board ratified a Letter of Opposition written by the EDC to the Riverside County Planning Commission rejecting the proposed General Plan Amendment for lack of infrastructure. • A representative of the Domenigoni/Barton Project will make a presentation regarding major transportation improvements to North Highway 79 to the EDC Transportation/Infrastructure Committee at its next meeting. • The EDC is soliciting proposals from Public Relations firms.-- The EDC would like to educate the community regarding the benefits of economic development and the role of the EDC. • EDC plan to update their brochure. • The EDC rejected the IEEP's offer to partner with them as it is a duplication of resources provided by the EDC and Economic Alliance. Staff reported that Dr. John Husing is updating the Temecula demographic profile, city is planning to specify cites for installing cell towers, status of the Veteran's war memorial; and Wolf Creek Fire Station was approved. Staff, Southwest California Economic Alliance Solid State Stamping attended the Foreign Diamond Stadium Club on October 6`h. Mr. Consultants, made a powerpoint presentation on the expansion of the Foreign Trade Zone Zone can benefit a business or community. staff members, representatives of Guidant and Trade Zone Workshop at the Lake Elsinore David Harlow, President of International Trade on the Foreign Trade Zone Program. He spoke at March Air Base and how the Foreign Trade March Global Port does have the Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) designation. This allows eligible businesses to simplify paperwork and can have tax advantages for businesses that import or export. This can be advantageous for existing businesses, and this designation can also be applied to vacant land, increasing the marketability of the property. March is interested in expanding their designation and has contacted Temecula, as well as Corona and other nearby areas to determine if we are interested in pursuing an expansion. The Alliance partners feels that the Foreign Trade Zone Designation sounds promising and something that the Alliance might consider. The Alliance will verify the information with Phil Rizzo, executive director of the March Joint Powers Authority and also try to determine interest by the business and brokerage community in coordination with the Economic Development Corporation and Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. On October 25`h, staff attended the Southwest California Economic Alliance Partners Committee Meeting. Below are updates on the following agenda items: Web Site — Job Posting The Alliance is upgrading its web site to include job postings for local non -retail businesses (using EDC Business Relations site visit categories). This site will allow employers to post jobs directly or to link to their own web site. Preliminary discussions with employers indicate that this will be a much -appreciated service for existing firms, and will be yet another reason for prospective employers to locate in SW California. The development of the site itself is complete, and the Alliance is beginning to contact employers to build the listing base, and then will prepare a number of press releases and other announcements to publicize this to the residents of our region. CITYMGR\WOLNICKGNUGUST'WDEP .Mn.DOC Golf Tournament The Alliance reported that their web "hits" for information nearly doubled in August and September at about the time of the tournament, but is difficult to know if it was related to publicity from the golf tournament. Several prospective businesses were hosted by the Alliance at the tournament, and they appear to be good solid leads, including a biotech firm. An ad for the Alliance was shown several times on the Golf Channel. The Alliance will discuss sponsorship of next year's event at another meeting. Southwest California Economic Alliance Trademark Stan Harter (member of the EDC) is looking to trademark the Southwest California name and logo. This process was started shortly after the Alliance "launch" last January. In recent months, a group formed called the "Southwest California Business Alliance". Information about this group can be found on the "Bugle" website and consists of firms that have pledged not to hire undocumented workers. While the Alliance has encouraged others to use the name Southwest California (e.g. The Chamber and UCR for promoting the new leadership academy), the Bugle effort has a name quite similar to the Economic Alliance and could lead to confusion. Stan Harter has sent a letter asking them to not use this name because of the similarity to the Economic Alliance name. While they have not changed the name of this group, their website now has a statement that this group is not connected with the Southwest California Economic Alliance. Foreign Trade Zone Designation David Harlow attended the Alliance meeting and provided additional information on the Foreign Trade Zone Designation. TOURISM Media/ Outreach Materials/Advertisin Staff submitted special event information and photos to RV Journal magazine. Eight of Temecula's special events w/photos were featured in the Fall issue of RV Journal. (see attached) Staff provided information to Morris Miller of Affluent Living Publications. They are planning to include Temecula in one of their magazines. They produce direct mail magazines which are created as trade publications for homeowners. The City continues to advertise in Westways Magazine (Automobile of Southern California). Staff is updating the Tourism CD Rom. Revisions will include: Children's Museum, Old Town Community Theater, new special events & wineries. The CD is distributed at travel shows, in tourism & business press kits, and to the media. Staff updated the press releases in the City's Tourism Press Kit. Staff submitted major holiday events in Temecula to the Anaheim/Orange County Convention & Visitors Bureau to include in their holiday press releases and advertorial. Advertisina Co-O Disneyland's 50`h Anniversary Celebration is next year. The Anaheim/Orange County Area special commemorative, 12-page, 4-color insert which will appear in USA Today in 9 major markets on Friday, April 8, 2005. The distribution for the section will be a little over 1 million. The readership should be excess of 3 million potential visitors. Anaheim/OC Convention & Visitors Bureau is underwriting the insert by $55,000 so that advertisers can participate at specially reduced prices. A meeting will be held on November 16th at City Hall for those interested in participating in the co-op ad for Temecula. Meetings Staff attended the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Tourism Meeting on October 71h at Callaway Vineyard & Winery. The Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Speaker Bureau Presentation was given. This presentation is given to business, civic, non- profit groups to inform them of the economic benefits that tourism brings to the area. A presentation was given on the Anaheim/Orange County Area CVB supplement in USA Today that will support Disneyland in the launch of its 50`h Anniversary Celebration. Tourism destination reports were given. Staff reported on advertising: Westways, coverage in Inland Empire's Visitor Guide, incorporating Temecula in City of Ontario Technical Tours and Temecula packages for Golf & Wine Travel. Announced Fall Car Show & Old Town Cruise and Race for the Cure (pink lights hung at the Duck Pond). Staff attended the Temecula Valley CVB FAM Tour Committee Meeting on October 7'h at Callaway Vineyard & Winery. In March 2005 will be the first FAM tour. Staff met with Annie Howell and Tom Peterson on October 271h to discuss new photography, and design of tourism rack brochure and ad. Leads Staff provided information and contacts to several groups that planned to visit Temecula Wine Country in October including the Kiwanis in San Diego County and an Orange County group. ATTACHMENTS Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Activities Report Southwest California Economic Alliance Activities Report (not submitted) Media Coverage TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE November 12, 2004 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the October Monthly Activity Report as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of October at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights: In the month of October, 5 businesses requested to Temecula. They received a business packet, demographics, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, information on starting or relocating their business which included a copy of the City of Temecula organizations, etc. Board of Directors Highlights: Currently the Chambers of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore are actively working with a Chamber Advocacy firm to develop a regional government program. The program will actively track the numerous issues that impact the business community and will help create an advocacy program. Leadership Academy 2004 Update — The program concluded with the presentation of certificates on Thursday, October 28, 2004. The response from participants has been overwhelmingly positive and they appreciated the high level of instructors that who were secured. A list of seventeen individuals who have stated an interest in participating in a future Leadership Academy has been gathered. Committee Highlights: "New Benefits are underway for the "Shop Temecula First Campaign". For the first time, the STF program will be showcasing its purpose via television commercials through Adelphia Media. July and November will be Rewards Months in which consumers and participating businesses have the chance to win $1,000. Sponsors of the event are Callaway Coastal and The Press -Enterprise. Tourism & Visitors Council (TVCVB): Friday, October 1s`, posted RFP for new TVCVB Website. This website is designed to provide booking services to sell the Temecula Valley as a destination and also serve as a one -stop booking service. The contract will be awarded by November 10`h. The TVCVB site will be operational by February 1, 2005. The TVCVB site will link to many tourism -based business sites. Wednesday, October 6s', Held meeting with Melody Brunsting, Marketing representative for Old Town Temecula. Melody was asked to partner with the TVCVB to head up an Old Town committee for 2005. This committee will be designed to partner with key stakeholders. Our goals are to support and improve communication between venues, promote awareness of current events and upcoming events, festivals and support co-operative opportunities. Thursday, October 14`h, TVCVB held a "Haunted Halloween Fundraiser" Mixer at the Castle Bed and Breakfast. Over 200 local people attended the event and funds were raised to help support the efforts of the TVCVB. Tuesday, October 19`h, held planning meeting with TVCVB Committee Chair and Dr. Billie Blair from Leading & Learning Inc. This meeting was to review the current and future direction of the TVCVB and to establish a three-part work shop to develop a strategic planning process focusing on the fast growth of the Temecula Valley. We will perform a S.W.O.T. Analysis and address strengths, 26790 Ynez Court • Temecula, CA 92591 Phone: (951) 676-5090 • Fax: (951) 694-0201 www.temecula.org • el mail: info@temeculo.org growth of the Temecula Valley. We will perform a S.W.O.T. Analysis and address strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The first Leadership Group is scheduled for December 71h at Warner Spring Ranch. Thursday, October 21s1 - Saturday, October, 23 d worked with Black Diamond Productions on "The Taste of California" television series. The crew filmed at Hart Winery, Mount Palomar Winery, Thornton Winery, Warner Springs Ranch, Pechanga Resort and Casino, A Grape Escape, South Coast Winery and Magical Adventures. The series will air on United Airlines and the Travel Channel in the spring of 2005. Wednesday, October 271h, met with political consultants regarding campaign to increase "Visitor Fee" to fund the TVCVB. This proposal would support a November 2005 election. Thursday, October 281h, TVCVB staff attended business workshop meeting with the newly formed Fallbrook Tourism and Economic Development Implementation Committee. Present were Michael Cartwright, Karon Cartwright of Pala Mesa Resort, Vince Ross of the Fallbrook Village Association and Don McDougal from Grand Traditions. The TVCVB shared its vision of tourism and economic growth with the group in hopes to create a healthy and resourceful working relationship to benefit the entire Temecula Valley Region. Education Committee: The committee has begun planning for the 5s' Annual Youth Job Fair. The event will be held once again at the Promenade Mall. The committee will strive to secure larger employers outside of the mall to participate. Committee will be discussing the option of changing the judging criteria for the Scholarship to include an essay question combined with their application. Special Events Committee: The 131h Annual Business Expo was held on Thursday, October 21, 2004 at The Promenade In Temecula. 81businesses participated in the event. Nominations for Business, Citizen and Non -Profit Organization of the year were accepted during the month of October. The Chamber received a total of 75 nominations and will be announcing the nominees shortly. The Installation Committee is currently meeting to plan the February 19, 2005 Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Awards Gala to be held at Pechanga Resort & Casino. Local Business Promotions Committee: The Shop Temecula First Subcommittee now has 73 participants in the program. The months of October, November and December are covered for the minimum cable -TV participants per month. The Business Resource Program is researching topic ideas for a possible second DVD to produce. The Mystery Shopper winner for November is P'ZAZ! Gifts Unique. The Businesses of the Month for November, chosen by the Government Action Committee, are Alternatives to Domestic Violence and Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors. The Chamber Spotlight winner for November is Vanguard Industries, Inc. Government Action Committee: The Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore Chambers of Commerce have received a proposal from Chamber Advocacy, Inc. They will work together to create an effective advocacy program for membership and empowering the membership to create a healthy business environment. The Chamber has published a list of positions on upcoming propositions. The positions were included in the Chamber's E-Commerce Newsletter. Membership Committee: 29 businesses joined the Chamber in October. Staff and ambassadors attended 4 ribbon cuttings. Over 50 members attended new member reception. Business Spotlights were: Bill Seltzer/Temecula Valley Golf School and LaVonna Lacy/Re/max. Due to Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday, Ambassador Networking Breakfast will resume January 26, 2005 and Roundtable Discussion will resume February 4, 2005 Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distributors) Activity Report: • 168 Visitor Guide requests were processed from the City of Temecula's Westway's advertising marketing piece. • 420 Visitor Guides were distributed to John Geurts of the Chaparral Antique Mall for visitors coming to the area. 80 Visitor Guides, 80 Tourism Maps and 80 Winery Brochures were distributed to Ken Zignorski of OGB Partners for an investor meeting in Temecula. • 210 Visitor Guides and 350 Winery Maps were distributed to Diane Reyes with & Casino for tourist needs. • 60 Visitor Guides and 60 Tourism Maps were distributed to Ruby Howard with Faith Ministry for a conference in Temecula. Activity Report: • Tourism calls for the month of October — 1,561 • Phone calls for the month of October — 2,856 • Walk-ins for the month of October — 2,084 • Web Page User Sessions for the month of October — 3,316 • Website Tourism Survey - " How did you hear about Temecula' Article — 1 % Friend - 39% Link — 9% Magazine - 5% Other - 27% Radio — 1 % Search — 11 % TV — 7% Pechanga Resort Ecclesia Hearts In - 67 responses were received: Also, attached are the meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Government Action, Local Business Promotions, Membership and Marketing and Special Events committee. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call me at (951) 676 asullivan@temecula.org. Thank you. -5090 or e-mail Sincerely, Alice 8UUjv5n President/CEO cc: Mayor Mike Naggar Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Comerchero Councilman Jeff Stone Councilman Ron Roberts Councilman Chuck Washington Shawn Nelson, City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Monthly Activity Report October 2004 Chamber Vis. Center Year -To -Date PHONE CALLS This Month This Month Total TOURISM Tourism Referrals 294 3,263 Calendar of Events 144 1,640 Special Events 232 2,012 General Information 891 11,022 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,561 17,937 Relocation 133 1,981 Demographics 100 1,307 Chamber 770 8,726 Miscellaneous 292 2,759 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 2,856 32.710 WALK-INS Tourism 187 60 1,907 Calendar of Events 128 - 1,428 Special Events 87 7 801 General Information 733 51 7,634 Relocation 144 2 1,637 Demographics 112 1,195 Chamber 422 4,643 Miscellaneous 271 2,463 TOTAL WALK-INS 2,084 120 21,708 MAILINGS Tourism 1,247 7,200 Relocation 42 632 Demographics 38 601 TOTAL MAILINGS 1,327 8,433 E-MAIL Tourism 87 1, 048 Relocation 73 903 903 Miscellaneous 189 3,396 TOTAL E-MAIL 349 5,347 WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS 3,316 46,898 GRAND TOTALS This Month Year -To -Date PHONE CALLS 2,856 32,710 WALK-INS 2,084 21,708 MAILINGS 1,327 8,433 E-MAIL 349 5,347 WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS 3,316 46,898 Annual Volume Comparisons Chamber Chamber Percentage October 2003 October 2004 PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 278 294 6% Calendar of Events 158 144 -9% Special Events 171 232 36% General Information 1,255 891 -29% TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,862 1,561 -16% Relocation 193 133 -31% Demographics 162 100 -38% Chamber 976 770 -21% Miscellaneous 118 292 147% TOTAL PHONE CALLS 3,311 2,856 -14% WALK-INS Tourism 190 187 -2% Calendar of Events 137 128 -7% Special Events 71 87 23% General Information 765 733 -4% Relocation 168 144 -14% Demographics 144 112 -22% Chamber 450 422 -6% Miscellaneous 93 271 191 % Visitor Center Walk -Ins 182 120 -34% TOTAL WALK-INS 2,200 2,204 0% MAILINGS Tourism 800 1,037 30% Relocation 61 42 -31% Demographics 63 38 -40% TOTAL MAILINGS 924 1,117 21% E-MAIL Tourism 111 87 -22% Relocation 96 73 -24% Miscellaneous 393 189 -52% TOTAL E-MAIL 600 349 -42% WEBSITE USER SESSIONS 6,849 3,316 -52% * Chamber referrals reflect faxes, walk-ins and phone calls TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Tourism & Visitors Council Meeting Minutes Thursday, October 7`h, 2004 @ 11:30 a.m. Callaway Vineyard & Winery Chairperson: Cherise Manning (not present) Co -Chair: Kelly Daniels (present) Board Liaison: Rusty Manning (not present) Bette Endresen (not present) Michael Doblado (not present) Committee Present: Ken Westmyer, Rose Kamppila, Robin Varnet, Gloria Easterwood, Valarie Skovron, Ginny Mulhern, Jim Brady, Judi Brady, Isabelle Mizrahi, Clifford Nunn, Myron Tiemens, Donna Craig, Jennifer Eastmas, Darleen Henderson, Laurie Dimond, Jeri Smith, Kay McCain, Tanya Mattern, Cindy Bailey, Billie Blair, Gloria Wolnick, Bob Bryant, Jim Garber, Charlene Keys, Bill Long, Jeannie Miley, Jim Miley, Paul Cauchi, Melody Brunsting, Herry Masek, Nina Stanley, Deborah Ness, Jeff Brown, Emily Reyes, Bill Seltzer, Sheila Ryle Staff Present: Kimberly Adams & Carrie Kumano Call to Order/Introductions Daneils called the meeting to order at 12:00 p.m. Self Introductions were made around the group. Meeting Minutes Westmyer made a motion to approve the September 91h, 2004 Tourism & Visitors Council meeting minutes as written. Varnet seconded the motion, which carried. Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau — Speaker Bureau Presentation • Westmyer gave the Speaker Bureau presentation to the group.. Anaheim CVB — Special USA Today Section Advertising Opportunity • Bill Long and Jim Garber made a presentation to the group on behalf of the Anaheim CVB regarding an advertising opportunity with USA Today. Beginning in late Spring 2005, all of Anaheim and Orange County will support Disneyland in the launch of its 50th Anniversary Celebration `The Happiest Homecoming on Earth." To introduce this special time, the Anaheim / Orange County Area CVB is creating a 12-16 page, four-color, broad sheet size supplement to appear in regional sections of USA Today on Friday, May 13, 2005. The Anaheim / Orange County Area CVB is underwriting the piece by $55,000 so that advertisers can participate at specially reduced prices. The section will be 50% editorial and 50% advertising. They believe that these articles should drive midweek business and circulation should reach 1 million readers. All ad sizes are available but reservations are encouraged by November. For more information, please contact Jim at 626-355-3515 or Bill at 949-476-2788. Tourism Subcommittee Groups • Marketing & Research Subcommittee — We are currently putting the survey results together. The City of Temecula has agreed to fund the TVCVB website. Next subcommittee meeting Tue. 10/26 at 10:00am at the TVCC. • Speaker Bureau Subcommittee — The Speaker Bureau is continuing with their presentations through November. If anyone would like the Speaker Bureau to come and make a presentation to their group, please contact the TVCVB. Next subcommittee meeting Thu. 11/11 at 10:45am at the TVCC. • FAM/Tradeshow Subcommittee — The group has determined that March 2005 will be the first FAM Tour. Next subcommittee meeting Tue. 10/16 at 10:OOam at the TVCC. City Marketing Report • Wolnick reported that there were 500 leads from Westways Magazine for the month of September. They are participating in the following areas: Inland Empire's Visitor Guide for 2005; City of Ontario Technical Tours; Golf and Wine Travel to Australia and South Africa; Fall Car Show & Old Town Cruise; Race for the Cure (pink lights will be hung throughout the city). Tourism Destination Reports • Arts Council of Temecula — Ryle mentioned the Earl Stanley Gardner event and that the Dance, Dance, Dance Program will be shortened for next year. • Old Town Temecula — Brunsting mentioned Halloween in Old Town from 2p — 5p on Sat. 10/30 and Sun. 10/31. There will be the pet costume parade on Sat. along with a pet psychic. • Pechanga Resort & Casino — The new expansion grand opening will be on Wednesday, November 10, 2004. • Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association — No Report. • Temecula Valley International Film Festival — No Report. • Temecula Valley Museum & Children Museum — No Report. Member Updates • Rusty Acres Herb Farm will be at the Del Mar Fairgrounds this weekend, 10/9 — 10/10 with plants and veggies for sale. They will also be on channel 8 soon promoting their cookbook. For more information contact Jim or Judi Brady at (760) 731-7349 or visit www.rustyacres.com . • Premier Bride now has a new office in the Temecula area. For more information please contact Charlene Keys at (951) 308-1843. TVCC Board Update Adams reported Ambassador Networking Breakfast will be at 7:30am on Wednesday, October 271h, 2004 at Embassy Suites Hotel — Temecula Valley Wine Country. Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Haunted Castle Mixer on Thursday, October 14'h, 2004 from 6:30pm — 9:30pm at The Castle Bed & Breakfast. Business Showcase on Wednesday, October 20'h, 2004 from 5:00 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. at the Promenade Mall. Next Meeting Date: Thursday, November &h @ 11:30 a.m. Location: Hampton Inn & Suites 2 EDUCATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Thursday, January 8, 2004 9:00 a.m. Chair: Donna Wilder (Not present) Members Present: Mark Margolin, Tracy Hunter, Jimmy Moore, Danielle Clark, Donna Ramirez, Rick Shader, Cheryl Ferulli Staff Present: Laura Turnbow Approval of Minutes Moore made a motion to approve the December 11, 2003 meeting minutes. Hunter seconded, which carried. Goals Committee reviewed the 2003 Goals and added the following: • Add Take Your Child to Work or Take your Parent to School Day under the career education goals. • Support the College Campus plan • Adjust recognition goal to include all district personnel • Change verbiage from Diversity Awareness to "Stand Up For Our Community" Career Education Video Margolin reported that Partners in Education is offering their input in creating the videos. There has been discussion regarding mirroring the videos with the types of classes within the District. Video coverage should also include instruction on interview skills. Margolin noted that the TVUSD has allocated funds for the purchase of video equipment, which can be used to film the video. Stand Up For Our Communit Margolin offered a recap of this program. Additional funds to compensate the District for the cost of the performances are still needed. Committee members are contacting organizations that previously stated an interest in sponsorship or did not respond to requests. Additional funds are also needed to cover the cost of printing the posters, which will be displayed at the schools and sponsor locations. Youth Job Fair Hunter reported that next committee meeting is scheduled for January 14`h at 9:00 a.m. The Committee is looking to increase the number of both employer and student participants. Ferulli will inquire with RYLA (Rotary Youth Leadership) regarding participation. Ferulli suggested utilizing the Interact and Key Clubs for participation. Hunter stated the committee will be going door-to-door to solicit employer participation at the mall and other retail centers. School Employee Recognition Clark and Mapleton will meet to discuss the method by which certificates will be distributed to district personnel Student of the Month The Student of the Month Luncheon will take place on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 at 12:00 p.m. at Sizzler Restaurant. School and Colleges Update No Report. City Update No report. Board Update • Turnbow reported the next Chamber Mixer is January 21, 2004 at Aloha J's. • The Chamber's Annual Planning Conference is being held on January 22, 2004. Board members, Committee chairs and staff will attend. Meeting adjourned. Thank You! Next Education Committee Meeting is Thursday, February 12, 2004, 9:00 a.m. in the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Government Action Committee A Joint Committee ofMurrieta and Temecula Chambers of Commerce Meeting Minutes Monday, October 18, 2004 Murrieta Chamber of Commerce Present: Ralph Ferro, Dennis Frank, Karen Wikert, Kevin Jeffries, Jeff Greene, Kim Cousins, Billie Blair, Pete Zullo, Gene Wunderlich, Peg Moore, Bill Lohr, Marlene Best, David Graham Staff: Denise Fay, Valerie Preston — Murrieta; Alice Sullivan, Laura Turnbow —Temecula I. Meeting was called to order by Wunderlich at 12:05 pm. II. Self Introductions III. Approval of September Meeting Minutes IV. State reports A. CA State Senator Hollingsworth - No report B. CA State Senator Batten - Lohr stated Batten will be Vice Chair of Rules Committee. C. CA State Assemblyman Haynes - Greene reported 2004 Nosey Awards Winners. D. CA State Assemblyman Benoit- No report. V. Legislative Reports A. U.S. Congressional District 43, Calvert - No report. B. U.S. Congressional District 45, Mary Bono - No report. C. U.S. Congressional District 48, Issa - No report. VI. City Reports A. City of Murrieta — No report B. City of Temecula — No report C. City of Lake Elsinore - Best reported committee formed to change voting years to even numbered years. VII. Chamber Reports A. Temecula - Sullivan reported Business Expo on Oct. 20. Now accepting Business and Citizen of the Year nominations. B. Lake Elsinore - No report C. Murrieta - Preston reported Fall Business Expo to take place on 11-4. VIII. Committee voted to recommend support of Prop IA to Chamber Boards. Wunderlich advised of workshop Oct. 18`h for Wildomar annexation. Sullivan stated Board approved negotiations with Chamber Advocacy Inc. IX. Meeting adjourned 12:30 pm TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Local Business Promotions Committee MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, October 20", 2004, @ 8:00am TVCC Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Committee Chair: Bert Baluyut (present) Co -Chair: Kurt Peck (present) Board Liaison: Vacant Members Present: Bob Hagel, Lisa Fuess, Kirby Bown, Carole Crocker, Arnel Ticsay Staff: Carrie Kumano Welcome & Introductions Baluyut called the meeting to order at 8:02am. Self -introductions were made around the room. Approval of Minutes Bown made a motion to approve the September 15th, 2004 meeting minutes as written and Hagel seconded the motion, which carried. Shop Temecula First Crocker mentioned that currently we are short of budget for the year. Kumano handed out the most recent list of participants. We now have 57 participants and we still need 2 commercials for the month of November. Crocker asked all committee members to please contact some businesses and try to sign up 3-4 each so that we can meet our budget at the end of the program. Crocker will ask the Press Enterprise to allow one more rewards month in March to have an incentive for businesses to sign up even after November. She will also see if we can have one of the P.E. ads run on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. Shop Temecula First will have a booth at the Business Showcase this evening. Crocker also stated that if the subcommittee members did not want to sell the program, she would be willing to do the final "push" to try to get them to join. Fuess mentioned that she would be willing to call some of the members to help. Kumano will print out a list of possible interested members and e-mail to Fuess. Member Recognition Program Hagel reviewed the monthly winners. • Mystery Shopper Program (Courtesy of DHL Business Solutions & The Californian): — October — Unique Experience Hair & Nail Salon — November— P'ZAZ! Gifts Unique • Businesses of the Month (Courtesy of KMYT 94.5 FM): — October (Local Business Promotions) — Adelphia Media Services — October (Local Business Promotions) — First Team Real Estate — November (Membership) — RKR Media Associates — November (Membership) — Walmart Chamber Spotlight (Courtesy of FROGGY 92.9): -- October — Ziegler & Son Publishing — November — The Bently Foundation Hagel mentioned that we should check on the date of the contract between the chamber and DHL Business Solutions and make sure that Lori Downs is willing to continue with the program. Kumano will follow-up. Hagel also stated that he will announce DHL's name when presenting the award. Baluyut mentioned that Froggy 92.9, Callaway and The Press Enterprise will be recognized at the next Ambassador Networking Breakfast. Business Resource Program Baluyut mentioned that we will be determining specific questions in order to send out a new Zoomerang Survey to the members on what topic would be the most needed. Baluyut expressed the need for a new subcommittee chair and to please contact him with any volunteers or suggestions. Board Update Kumano mentioned that Greg Brown resigned as a Director for the TVCC and a new Director should be appointed at the next Board meeting. Kumano gave an update on the following: • Ambassador Networking Breakfast, Wednesday, October 27, 2004 at 7:30am at the Embassy Suites Hotel — Temecula Valley Wine Country. • Business Showcase, Wednesday, October 20th, 2004 from 5:OOpm to 8:OOpm at The Promenade. Member Updates None Adjournment Thank you for attending! NEXT MEETING: November 17th, 2004 at 8:OOam Location: TVCC Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Membership and Marketing Meeting Minutes Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:00 a.m. — 9:00 a.m. Chamber Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Mission Statement: Develop programs to maintain and build a membership commensurate with the growth of the Temecula business community and simultaneous growth of the Chamber. Serve as goodwill representatives and strive to enhance the value of membership encouraging ongoing dialogue between members. Committee Chair: Timmy Daniels Board Liaison: Stan Harter Co -Chair: Judy Zulfiqar Committee Present: Carole Crocker, Kirby Bown, Ginny Mulhem, Jacob Tomseth, Dan Brunell, LaVonna Lacy, David Bush, Bill Seltzer, Kimberly Webb, Don Myers, Bob Bryant, RJ Hagel, Judy Zulfiqar, Timmy Daniels, Alma Gonzales, Teresa Kosyzcars, Bob Lorum Board Liaisons Present: Stan Harter Staff Present: Cora Saxarra & Shirley Eilek Minutes Committee chair Timmy Daniels called the meeting to order at 8:10 a.m. The minutes of the previous meeting were reviewed and motioned for approval by Kirby Bown and seconded by Dan Brunell; which carried. Membership Report The committee reviewed the Membership packet. Currently there are 1,361 members (reflects 29 new members, 75 renewals, 24 drops). Incentive Program letters have been sent out to all members under the category and waiting for any interested members to response. Bush, Lacy, Bryant and Brunell's concerns were that bigger companies could offer better incentives than little companies. There will be further discussion at the next meeting to determine the selection process. Daniel explained the pros and cons and reminded the committee that the program has not been approved by the board and will discuss it again next committee meeting. Zulfiqar mentioned that some of the events under membership are in -need of chair/co-chair person, a sign-up sheet was distributed around for anyone interested. Committee discussed the possibility of moving special topic discussions to the Roundtable Discussions due to the fact that members prefer to network at the breakfast. Follow Up Calls: Due to time constraints, follow up call were not made in September, however Seltzer stated they would be done this month. Ribbon Cutting: Ambassadors attending ribbon cuttings are encouraged to check the calendar on the Chamber website (www.temecula.ore) under the Chamber section and TVCC Ribbon Cutting Calendar subsection, for any changes. There were 4 ribbon cuttings attended by staff and ambassadors for the month of October. Roundtable Discussion: Zulfigar suggested changing the date to allow more members to attend the Roundtable Discussion and would like a suggestion from the committee. She also asked the committee to submit a topic to be discussed as well as ideas on how to market the Roundtable. Membership Workshop: Committee members who have not attended the workshop are encouraged to attend. Mixer: Next mixer will be on Wednesday, November 171h hosted by Sterling Senior Communities, 41780 Butterfield Stage Road. Ambassador Networking Breakfast: Due to Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday Ambassador Networking Breakfast will resume January 26, 2005 Bill Seltzer/Temecula Golf School and LaVonna Lacy/Re/Max are the two spotlight businesses for the month of October. A description of the assigned tasks will be handed to the entire ambassadors who signed up for the events. If for some reason the ambassadors cannot be at the events Daniels suggested getting a replacement. New Member Reception: A Special "Thank you" to Judy Zulfigar who presented the benefits of being a chamber member, also to all ambassadors and new members who attended the new member reception. Next reception will be in January 11 2005. Meeting adjourned: Next Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 8:OOam Chamber Boardroom Sponsored By: Community Little Book Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Special Events Committee Meeting Minutes October 19, 2004 Chairperson: Jennifer Jones Co -Chair: Melodee Leavitt Board Liaisons: Bette Endresen, Joan Tossing Members Present: Laura Bruno, Jennifer Jones, and Melodee Leavitt Board Present: Bette Endresen and Joan Tussing Staff Present: Kimberly Adams, Michelle Eilek, Melissa Hayer, and Carrie Kumano Approval of Minutes Leavitt made a motion to approve the September 21s` meeting minutes as written. Eilek second the motion, which carried. Business Showcase Update The 13` Annual Autumn Fest Business Showcase is scheduled for Wednesday, October 20`h at the Promenade In Temecula. Unfortunately, rain is in the forecast for the set date but the event will go on, rain or shine. Bruno suggested sending out an email blast encouraging exhibitors to prepare for wet conditions. Title Sponsor is Community Little Book. An affiliate sponsorship is still needed, but looks unlikely. 94 exhibitors have been confirmed to date. TCI is donating 318 linens to cover the tables at this event - Thank You Doug. Installation The 2005 TVCC Awards Gala is scheduled for February 19`h, 2005 at Pechanga Resort & Casino. The committee has agreed on a theme and is working on event logistics. Invitations are currently being designed by Charlene Keys with Premier Bride. pm. at Pechanga Resort & Casino for a walk through. Board Updates The Chamber is now accepting board nominations. Committee Updates Adams and Kumano gave a presentation for their Speaker Bureau. They gave a general overview of the TVCVB and the great impact it has on the Temecula Valley. Results from their survey showed some of the main tourist destinations in the area. Wonderful job girls! Next Meeting Date Tuesday, November 16th at 11:30 a.m. at the TVCC. ED C ra Southwest Riverside County November 9, 2004 Jim O'Grady City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RE: EDC Activity Summary — October 2004 Business and Workforce Development Staff responded to the following seven business and workforce development requests in October 2004: Date Lead Source Re uest Action Taken 10/4/04 E-mail Client requested assistance with Forwarded employment resource internet link. obtaining ern to ent. 10/7/04 Phone Client requested assistance with Connected client with Workforce Development Center. obtaining employment 10/8/04 Phone Client requested contacts at City Provided client with Temecula website address. of Temecula for proposed baseball stadium project. 10/14/04 E-mail Client requested population Provided requested information via e-mail. growth information. 10/14/04 E-mail Client requested information on Provided client with referrals for marketing needs. marketing a home based business. 10/26/04 E-mail Client requested information on Called client several times and left message. No contact opening a local restaurant. made. 10/26/04 E-mail Client offered consulting services Connected client with the Southwest California to the Economic Alliance to assist Economic Alliance. with business attraction / venture capital of San Diego tech companies. Community Outreach Staff and/or directors attended the following meetings/events to promote or support economic development/community outreach: • First TEAM #1079 C.R.E.A.T.E. Annual Picnic (10/2) • Murrieta-Temecula Group Meeting (10/1) • TVCC Partners in Education Meeting (10/4) • Foreign Trade Zone Workshop at Diamond Stadium (10/6) • Komen Race for the Cure Meeting (10/12) • Economic Alliance Partner Meeting (10/25) • Leads Networking Meeting (10/19) • Murrieta Broker Meeting (10/28) City of Temecula EDC Activity Summary — October 2004 Page 2 of 2 Business Retention • Business Relations Committee Meeting (10/7) —Minutes are attached. Administration/Organization • EDC Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Meeting (10/14) • Joint Committee Meeting - Industrial & Education (10/13) — Minutes are attached. • EDC Board of Directors Meeting (10/21) —Minutes are attached. • Administration - Staff managed the daily operations of the EDC office; managed website updates; processed membership renewals and packets; attended Leadership Academy training; provided assistance to the Economic Alliance for its job database project, secured bids for new EDC brochure project and public relations/newsletter project, and distributed the following business development/community announcements: ➢ UCR 61h Annual Industry Day October 27, 2004 ➢ Valley EDC "Progressive Dynamics for Our Valley" Breakfast in San Jacinto ➢ Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce, I" Annual Education Summit Hemet/Temecula Employer Advisory Council & EDD Luncheon Seminar This concludes the activity summary for October 2004. Should you have questions or need further detail, please call me at 677-1862. Respectfully, Diane Sessions Executive Director DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MEETING MINUTES Thursday, October 21, 2004 - 9:00 a.m. Murrieta Chamber of Commerce 26396 Beckman Court Suite C, CA 92562 BOARD MEMBERS Marlene Best, City of Lake Elsinore Frank Casciari, California Bank and Trust John Fili, Solid State Stamping Dennis Frank, UC Riverside - Temecula Center Scott Hurst, ProjectDesign Consultants Stan Harter, Mirau, Edwards, Cannon, Harter & Lewin Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank Melanie Neiman, Eastern Municipal Water District Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Rex Oliver, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce Greg Prudhomme, Kuebler Prudhomme and Company Claude Reinke, The Californian Harry Shank, Southwest Community Bank Joan Sparkman, Temecula Valley Bank Al Vollbrecht, City of Murrieta Roger Zeimer, The Gas Company DRAFT MEMBERS AND GUESTS Dr. Billie Blair, Leading and Learning Inc. Cheryl Ferrulli, CLF Financial Christina Lindley, Keeton Construction Doug McCallister, Murrieta City Council Don Myers, Coldwell Banker ABR Chuck Washington, City of Temecula Diane Sessions Liz Yuzer Ken Lawrence EDC STAFF CALL TO ORDER • Board President Dennis Frank called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. He welcomed members and guests and presented membership renewal materials to a number of board members and new EDC members. APPROVE AGENDA • Motion was made by Joan Sparkman, seconded by Roger Ziemer and carried unanimously to approve the agenda as amended by adding item (f) IEEP Marketing Campaign, under New Business.. MINUTES • The Board reviewed the minutes of the September 16, 2004 Board of Directors Meeting. Motion was made by Jim O'Grady, seconded by Harry Shank and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the September 16, 2004 Board of Directors Meeting as presented. FINANCIAL REPORT • September 30, 2004 Financial Reports: The Board reviewed the September 30, 2004 Financial Report that showed total monthly revenues of $16,204, total expenses of $20,623 and total cash -in -bank of $135,905. Motion was made by Claude Reinke, seconded by Rex Oliver and carried unanimously to approve the September 30, 2004 Financial Report as presented. Exhibit 3.0 Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting — October 21, 2004 Minutes — Page 2 of 3 • Quarterly Luncheon Reconciliation: The Board reviewed the September 23, 2004 Quarterly Luncheon Reconciliation that showed total income of $3810, total expenses of $3255.90, and total income over expenses of $554.10. • Membership Renewals: Diane Sessions summarized the EDC membership renewals to date and reported that although there were still some outstanding, most renewals had been received. NEW BUSINESS • First TEAM 1079: John Fili announced an upcoming national robotics competition and the assembly of TEAM 1079 from the local high schools to participate. Frank Casciari gave a detailed description of the competition and suggested that the EDC make a monetary contribution to TEAM 1079. The Board discussed the benefits of investing in the development of manufacturing and engineering in the area. TEAM 1079 has raised $3000 of the required $6000 entry fee. Joan Sparkman motioned for the EDC to contribute the remaining $3000, seconded by Roger Ziemer. Diane Sessions made the Board aware that $2400 of soft money exists from the Manufacturer's Council merge. The motion was amended by Roger Ziemer to contribute the said $2400 from the EDC and the remaining $600 difference would be contributed by The Gas Company. The motion was carried. • Ratify Letter of Opposition to General Plan Amendment 00717: Motion was made by Rex Oliver, seconded by Greg Prudhomme and carried unanimously by the Board to ratify the October 14, 2004 Letter of Opposition written by the EDC to the Riverside County Planning Commission. The Board discussed the reasons for rejecting the proposed General Plan Amendment including lack of infrastructure. The project to build medical and educational facilities was considered not feasible. • Domenigoni/Barton Project: Dennis Frank updated the Board on new maps and changes to the Domenigoni/Barton Project which included major transportation improvements to N. Hwy. 79. Mr. Frank suggested that a representative from the project make a presentation to the EDC Transportation/Infrastructure Committee at the next board meeting. The Transportation Committee made it clear that they plan to get involved • Public Relations/Communication Proposal: Diane Sessions discussed the benefits of outsourcing a public relations campaign for the EDC. Ms. Sessions had received a bid from Parallax Communications and intended to receive proposals from several other marketing firms. The Board discussed the reasons for a concentrated public relations effort, including the need to educate the community regarding the benefits of economic development and the role of the EDC. Tactics for utilizing different media were mentioned, including an electronic newsletter and Comcast Cable coverage. • EDC Brochure Proposal: Diane Sessions introduced the idea of printing a new supply of EDC brochures and mentioned that she is taking bids from designers and printers. The board formed a committee for the approval of new brochures. Committed members included Melanie Neiman, Jim O'Grady, Stan Harter, and Mark Dennis. • lEEP Marketing Campaign: Diane Sessions described the IEEP's intentions to partner with the EDC and hold an event locally with public and private sector leaders. The Board made it clear that they did not support the IEEP's efforts to solicit memberships from within Southwest California. It was determined that the IEEP's presence was a duplication of resources provided by the EDC and Economic Alliance. Ms. Sessions was directed by the Board to reject the IEEP's offer. Exhibit 3.1 Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting — October 21, 2004 Minutes — Page 3 of 3 OPEN DISCUSSION • Corporate Name Change: Diane Sessions reported that the EDC had filed for a corporate name change to represent the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest California. Stan Harter described a potential conflict with Nancy Knight over the usage of the Southwest California location brand, and the Board discussed possible actions toward resolving the conflict. • Bylaw Review Committee Update: Stan Harter announced that the Bylaw Committee will continue its efforts in reviewing the Bylaws with intent to ultimately present their review to the Board of Directors. • Utilities Updates: Melanie Neiman expressed gratitude to Dennis Frank for an excellent leadership program, and reported the general well-being of the Eastern Municipal Water District. Diane Sessions announced that Southern California Edison renewed their membership with the EDC. • City Updates: City of Lake Elsinore — Marlene Best reported that a new high -quality shopping center at Railroad Canyon had been approved; a new fire station would be completed next year; construction had begun for the new Costco store; negotiations with investors regarding Storm Stadium had been reopened to proposals; and a new logo was being considered for the City of Lake Elsinore. City of Murrieta — Al Vollbrecht reported that Verizon was continuing to install fiber optic cable to all Murrieta properties; the issue regarding incorporation of the City of Wildomar was continuing to develop; and Murrieta's General Plan Review would be completed by March 2005. Doug McCallister reported that the 460,000-square-foot Orchard's shopping center was approved and that necessary road construction, including the widening of the Clinton Keith/215 bridge would be completed in two years. City of Temecula —Jim O'Grady reported that additional office space in Temecula had been approved; a demographic update was being conducted by Dr. Husing; the city was planning to specify cites for installing cell towers; a war memorial is scheduled to be erected; a forty-three acre park was approved; and a new fire station would be built. ADJOURNMENT • Dennis Frank thanked Rex Oliver for his efforts in providing the conference room for the meeting. At 10:15 a.m., motion was made by Keith Johnson, seconded by Joan Sparkman and carried unanimously to adjourn the board meeting. Respectively submitted by: Elizabeth Yuzer Recording Secretary Maryann Edwards Board Secretary Exhibit 3.2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, October 7, 2004 - 9:00 a.m. Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce 132 West Graham Avenue, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Committee Members Present: Guests: Kim Cousins, Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber Of Commerce Liz Yuzer, EDC Lisa Marie Ellis, Cutting Edge Staffing Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Greg Prudhomme, Kuebler, Prudhomme & Company Diane Sessions, EDC Call To Order • In the absence of Chair Stan Harter, Diane Sessions called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Follow-up Action Reports • Channell Corporation — Diane Sessions reported that she had followed up with Channell Corporation and all questions were resolved. Company Contact Reports • Kuebler, Prudhomme & Company — Diane Sessions reported on her visit with Greg Prudhomme—partner at Kuebler, Prudhomme & Company in Temecula. Kuebler, Prudhomme & Company had provided accounting and tax consulting services in Southwest California for 40 years. Their branches were in Hemet and Temecula. Business advantages of the area included new development and strong growth, particularly of the wealthy community. A disadvantage was the limited, qualified local labor force. Primary customers were characterized as wealthy individuals, corporations, and non-profit organizations from the local region including the cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Hemet, Menifee, and Sun City. The industry was described in general as stable. Mr. Prudhomme's company offered new services within the past three to five years, but did not plan to expand services within the next two years. The company leased their 3,500-square-foot facility, saw no potential for facilities expansion in the near future, and did not require an improvement in telecommunications technology. The staff made up twelve full-time employees, eight of whom resided in the Temecula/Murrieta area, one in Lake Elsinore/Wildomar, one in San Jacinto/Hemet, and one in Sun City/Menifee. Due to growth in their business, they were planning to increase their employee base by one or two individuals, but were experiencing major difficulties in recruiting additional qualified personnel. They were already using such avenues as newspaper advertisements, internet, and employment agencies among other recruiting methods. The company required technical, computer, office, and finance skills of their employees. Mr. Prudhomme was satisfied doing business in Southwest California, and he was willing to be a contact for companies relocating to the area. Action: Place Greg Prudhomme on Partnership in Education Internship program. • Temecula Valley Drywall/Timberlake Painting — Greg Prudhomme reported that he met with Doug Misemer of Temecula Valley Drywall/Timberlake Painting in Temecula. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes — October 7, 2004 Page 2 of 3 The company began their business locally fourteen years previous and specialized in commercial drywall, steel framing, and commercial painting. The business advantages of the area were its central location and economically -healthy development. Disadvantages included limited local suppliers, limited labor pool, and transportation issues. Their business was conducted primarily among commercial builders. It was growing in the region and they relied on local suppliers Lowe's and Hank's. In the past they had offered new services and intended to continue to add services in the near future. Their current facility was a 3,500-square-foot lease, and they planned to expand by opening a 4,000-square-foot Murrieta location. They had 110 employees, only ten of whom were seasonal or part-time. Nearly all were from Lake Elsinore, Wildomar, Hemet, or San Jacinto, with five from the Murrieta/Temecula area. They planned to hire an additional thirty employees due to growth, but had experienced a shortage of non -union, skilled construction personnel. Mr. Misemer would have liked to see more trade and vocational education offered. He was happy doing business in Southwest California and would be willing to be a contact for companies relocating to the area. Action: Inquire regarding construction apprenticeships at Mt. San Jacinto College. • Financial Data Solutions, Inc. — Diane Sessions reported that Harry Shank met with Alan J. Lane, CEO of Financial Data Solutions, Inc., located in Murrieta. The company specialized in imaging and item processing, statement rendering, and remittance processing. They began their business locally six years ago, noting the business advantage of the area was its central location between Riverside and San Diego. Disadvantages included traffic, parking, and general infrastructure issues. Customers were located throughout California and included banks, credit unions, and property management companies. They offered new services in recent years and planned to offer more new services in coming years. Their facility was a 12,000-square-foot lease operating at 100% capacity, with no foreseeable expansion. They utilized 62 full-time employees and 105 part-time employees, all from various cities in the region. Employees were required to have basic computer and technical skills. Major obstacles included government regulations. Mr. Lane expressed that telecommunications infrastructure improvements would benefit his company. He was absolutely happy doing business in the area and he was willing to be a contact for companies relocating to the area. • Temecula Motor Sports — Lisa Marie Ellis reported that Harry Shank met with Mike Findlay, owner of Temecula Motor Sports in Temecula. The company dealt in new motorcycle sales, jet boats, and some repairs. They opened locally five years ago and noted the business advantages of local growth as well as the pleasant interaction with the cities of Murrieta and Temecula. Customers were primarily local private parties, and business was growing due to the strong economy. Their existing facility was 30,000 square -feet and they planned on purchasing their leased building and expanding the building to 41,000 square -feet. They had forty full-time employees and planned to increase their personnel by ten to fifteen individuals with computer and technical skills. The major obstacle facing Mr. Findlay was the political climate of California and worker's compensation requirements, but he said he was very happy dong business in the area and would be a contact for companies relocating. Action: The EDC can help Temecula Motor Sports with skills training. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes — October 7, 2004 Page 3 of 3 Annual Goal Report • Diane Sessions announced that visits and phone interviews in the fourth month of the fiscal year were as follows: Goal: 60 surveys completed. YTD VISIT PHONE SURVEYS Goal 0 0 60 Actual 8 0 8 Open Discussion • EDC Board Update - Diane Sessions reported the EDC Quarterly Luncheon was a success and the Board presented a $10,000 donation to support lobbying efforts to keep March Air Reserve Base from a possible closure under the Base Realignment and Closure. A letter of support from the EDC Board was delivered to March Joint Powers Authority (MJPA) in support of its effort to obtain approval from Riverside County to house an international air cargo company at March Air Field. • Announcements — Jim O'Grady reported that Milgard was in the process of an expansion, a new golf store opened on South Hwy. 79; Concordia University was having difficulty with completion of tenant improvements at their new office on Single Oak Drive; new business buildings were under construction on Ridgepark Drive; and Mr. O'Grady met the new director of the Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) at March Air Reserve Base to discuss an FTZ designation within the city. Kim Cousins communicated that he is a proponent of FTZ which has major financial implications. Adiournment The meeting adjourned at 10:10 a.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY JOINT MEETING OF THE INDUSTRIAL COMMITTEE AND EDUCATION COMMITTEE Wednesday, October 13, 2004 — 8:30 a.m. EDC Offices, 37552 Winchester Road, Murrieta, CA 92563 Industrial Committee Members Present: Education Committee Members Present: John Fili, Committee Chair / Frank Casciari, California Bank & Trust Solid State Stamping, Inc. Maryann Edwards, Committee Chair / Charolette Fox, League of Women Voters / Temecula Valley Unified School District L.O.C.A.L. Partners with League of CA Cities Roger Ziemer, Bill Prouty, Global Economic & Southern California Gas Company Workforce Development Coalition Del Ross, Enviro-DAC Diane Sessions, Economic Development Corporation Call To Order • Industrial Committee Chair John Fili called the meeting to order at 8:40 a.m. and led self introductions. A joint meeting of the EDC Industrial Committee and EDC Education Committee was held to discuss a mutual project. The Industrial Committee agreed to postpone discussion of the following agenda items exclusive to the Industrial Committee: 1) Continue Stakeholders' Matrix 2) Committee Goals and Objectives Identify Regional Needs and Issues for Industrial Businesses Special Projects with the Education Committee. First Team #1079 — John Fili reported on the history of FIRST, a national robotics program that encourages the application of science, technology, and engineering through high-school team competitions. He further reported that C.R.E.A.T.E (Chaparral Robotic Engineers and Techno Explorers) joined FIRST several years ago with the help of founders Bill and Debbie Woolley. First Team 1079 had participated in various competitions and was seeking financial support for two upcoming competitions in Los Angeles and Atlanta, GA. Mr. Fili reported the former Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council was a past sponsor of First Team and he recommended that the Industrial Committee continue this role. Members of both committees agreed to partner on this project as it was an area of interest in both manufacturing and education. Mr. Fili reported that Team 1079 had raised $3,000 for the pending LA competition and needed a total amount of $6,000 by December 1, 2004. Industrial Committee Meeting Minutes — October 13, 2004 Page 2 of 3 Committee members discussed a sponsorship for the upcoming competition and for future ongoing support that would ensure longevity of the club. Diane Sessions reported there were funds left over in the Manufacturers' Council's bank account after the EDC/Council merger. The funds could be donated by approval of the EDC Board of Directors. Committee members discussed donating $1,500 in matching funds. Roger Ziemer announced that he would look into a possible sponsorship by The Gas Company. Both John Fili and Maryann Edwards agreed to seek board approval for a donation to support First Team 1079. Maryann Edwards recommended that regional manufacturers be contacted to seek their interest in future sponsorships or to house the program in a manufacturing plant. She further suggested that students in technology studies at local colleges/universities be contacted to seek interest in forming an advisory group for Team 1079. Mr. Fili suggested finding a teacher from the high school to facilitate the club, as the Woolleys would not continue in their role next year. Frank Casciari suggested that EDC members who are engineers be contacted for their involvement. Other Business • California Centers of Excellence Competitions — Bill Prouty reported on a series of workshops and competitions scheduled in November 2004 that promotes organizational performance, innovation and lean operations. Other reports by Mr. Prouty included matching grants through the Department of Labor for skills standards training and Employee Training Panel funds. • Foreign Trade Zone — John Fili reported on a recent workshop he attended on benefits of a Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) for manufacturers. He suggested that the committee discuss this topic at the November meeting. Bill Prouty agreed to contact the FTZ consultant to inquire if there were any negative or mitigating factors for manufacturers or cities should they apply for FTZ status. Action Items 1. Call Carl Johnson of Near -Cal Corp. for his interest in First Team 1079. (Diane Session) 2. Setup matching funds procedures/account for future contributions by EDC. (Diane Session) 3. Get contact for STEP from Charolette Fox. (Diane Session) 4. Arrange First Team presentation for EDC board meeting /place on agenda. (Diane Session) 5. Place announcements of First Team competitions in EDC email blast. (Diane Session) 6. Contact Joan Sparkman and Dr Geise (MSJC) and Dennis Frank (UCR) re: future partnership with First Team 1079. — Maryann Edwards Industrial Committee Meeting Minutes — October 13, 2004 Page 3 of 3 7. Contact Riverside Community College and David Hunt. (John Fili) 8. Contact Debbie Woolley about Career Fair at Lake Elsinore Storm. (Bill Prouty) 9. Contact FTZ consultant. (Bill Prouty) Next Committee Meeting • The next EDC Industrial Committee Meeting was scheduled for Monday, November 8, 2004 at 8:30 a.m. in the EDC offices. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 10:00 a.m. 'ter•° of 1 /AAz NE '� We t f i t l.e Y t �. 4 � � � f � 4 - , -• �r _. �=-ice � � �.,...�.- �n • i � L - (¢ 'tz � 1` x •. r / ,��+':.'- � ��..+ r L ems.: e7 t'•S � j 4 11 61 ol La 17* ld i' � •wn� „ ti i. t wp r"i r;, C3 nal.aco;m �;'I�il �� -.11. ��_y_. �' Ya / - •.c" j;. x `� �c`.. t; �xy c j_: i IP W Ca L W 0 Z Z F TEMECULA — Fall Events: 2004 Great Temecula Tractor Race, Oct 1-3. Enjoy Temecula's wackiest affair with live entertain- ment, midway carnival and don't miss the mud games including mud -bogging obstacle course, tug-o-war, and mud surfing contests! 8am-5pm. Cherry Street in Temecula (exit Winchester off I-15; go west to Jefferson; turn right on Jefferson and look for signs.) Admission: Free on Fri, $448, Sat -Sun. (Family of 4420.) Annual Outdoor Quilt Display, Oct 2. More than 150 colorful handcrafted quilts are N 1 BIG BEAR LAKE Big Bear Chamber of Commerce 630 Bartlett Rd, 877-866-5253 Q HEMET HEMET VISITOR AND TOURISM COUNCIL See ad on this page CAMPGROUNDS 1' AGUANGA O OUTDOOR RESORTS See ad on page 33 LL J Q U BIG BEAR LAKE BIG BEAR SHORES See ad on page 82 Holloway's Marina 8 RV Park 398 Edgemoor Road, 909-866-5706 INLAND EMPIRE displayed along Old Town Front Street from l0am-3pm. Quilt auction at 1pm. 951-506-5100 www.cityoftemecula.org Temecula Fall Car Show and Old Town Cruise, Oct 8-9. The Friday night cruise goes from arch to arch in Old Town, followed by an "Oldies" concert with performances by the Drifters and more. Show & Shine, treasure hunt, music, vendors and food are also offered. Admission is free. See ya' cruisin' CHINO PRADO REGIONAL PARK 50 shies w/full hook-ups, 25 w/water 8 elect. for groups. 16799 Euclid Ave., Chino, CA 91710 909-597-4260 CORONA T0HWY91 S CORONA N M'S FARM A R� �rv,C` •J/ TJLg1O -_\ HOT SPRINGS EL NORE GLEN IVY RV PARK 24601 Glen Ivy Road, Corona, CA 92883 Reservations 800-628-9044 or 909-277-4261 Secluded Canyon Location • Full Service Bar • Swimming • Restaurant • Store • Propane np Station • RV Club Facilities' Public Welcome Memberships Available • Lottery • Notary in Old Town Temecula. 951-325-7100 The Susan G. Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure, Oct 17. This benefit to help find a cure for breast cancer includes a health and fitness expo, kid's expo, kid's art contest, exhibits, celebri- ties, refreshment and entertainment. A special tribute to attending breast cancer survivors will be held all day, beginning at 6:30am. Promenade Mall in Temecula. Adults $25 (after Oct 10, $27; day of race $30) and $15 for survivors. 909-304-9500 •951-304-9500 www.iekomen.com Nr°'&,Eout Region 12 cont d on page 82 HEMET Florida Ave. 79 74 a' © Acacia Ave in y CASA an $01 N Q 5 RVPARK c ._ c >. J o' 1O m N RESORT Y A y HEMET " y tetson Ave CASA del SOL R.V. RESORT Daily, weekly 8 monthly rates. Group discounts avail. Across from Wal-Mart, close to got. 2750 W. Acacia, Hemet 92545. 888 925-2516 • Fax 909-925-8533. www.casadelsolrvpark.com Golden Village Palms RV Resort 3600 West Florida Ave, 800-323-9610 See ad on page 81 IDYLLWILD/SAN JACINTO Nurkey County 0 GARNER 'VALLEY �To PW Spige HURKEY CREEK COUNTY PARK 59 acres, 91 developed sites. Hiking, group camping. Reservations required. 800-234-7275. TO B.nn, QP N Q4 Idyllwild County Park© • IDYLLWILD COUNTY ¢R PARK RO, 0 3 TO Hemel p STATE H' 74 .MOUNTAIN CENTER To Palm Srfi p IDYLLWILO COUNTY PARK 202 acres, camping, equestrian trail, hiking/interpretive trail, picnic facilities. Reservations recommended. 800-234-7275. 1180 RV Jouma7 W It a 2 W 0 Z 1 Z — Z 11 0 LL J Q U e t lip`' coWLd f-- page 80 Old Town Temecula Howl-O- Ween, Oct 30-31. Mermaids, maid- ens, scary characters and cowboys are all invited to Old Town Temecula's Halloween celebration. Face painting, clowns, Dynamite Dave, costumed jugglers and more are part of the fun. A pet walk and costume contest will be held at Sam Hicks Park. Most events held in Old Town Temecula on Front Street from I Iam-5pm. Event is free. 951-694-6412 www.temeculacalifomia.com Old Town's Country Christmas Weekends, Nov 20- Dec 19. Carolers, bell -ringing choirs, children dancing to holiday tunes and the jolly of elf, Santa, are IDYLLWILD/SAN JACINTO ct'd MOUNT SAN JACINTO STATE PARK Idyllwild Campground Stone Creek Campground 909-659-2607, Res: 800-444-7275 ROYAL PINES HV PARK 26350 Delano Drive • P.O. Box 277, Idylhvild, CA 92549 909-659-2691 LAKE ELSINORE CITY CAMPGROUND & RECREATION AREA 32040 Riverside Drive, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 800-416-6992 for reservations. Crane Lakeside Park And Resort 15980 Grand Avenue, 909-678-2112 LAKE ELSINORE WEST MARINA & RV RESORT See ad on page 84 Lake Park Resort 32000 Riverside Drive, 909-674-7911 all part of the holiday festivities in Old Town. Santa arrives in a horse- drawn sleigh on Nov 20 and sets up his mini -village at the comer of 3rd and Front Street. He is accompa- nied by a horse-drawn trolley full of carolers; the trolley gives rides through Old Town. Entertainment includes high school and middle school bands, old-fashioned coun- try holiday bands, unique hammer dulcimers, marionette performances and colorful elves creating holiday balloon hats. Noon-5pm. 951-694-6412 www.temeculacalifomia.com Fourth Annual Holiday Tree Lighting Ceremony, Dec 6. Holiday music, hot chocolate, apple cider and holiday treats accompany Santa at this traditional tree light- ing. 6-8pm. Temecula Duck Pond, corner of Rancho California Road RIVERSIDE A Rancho Jumps Park 1\©. 350 acres in a peaceful setting near downtown Riverside. 70 sites w/electricity. Fishing, hiking, picnicking, equestri- an trails, group areas. Close to Jensen -Alvarado Historic Ranch & Louis Robidoux Nature Center 909-684-7032. Drop in or make reservations: 800-234-7275. come to Big Bear Shores The Ultimate ;1..: Recreation Vehicle Resort u've waited years for this. The dream of owning a mountain hideaway. Located Southern California's beautiful San Bernardino mountains, Big Bear Shores is utlimate R.V. resort. Complete with owner's clubhouse, marina, boat launch- ) ramp, tennis, swimming pool, spas, and a fitness center. The resort offers all i refinements of an exclusive country club. Rentals by reservation. wa sq ig Bear Shores PA. Box 1572, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 UMrekko one:909-866.4151 • Fax:909.866-4132 nail: info@bigbearshores.com www.bigbearshores.com and Ynez Road. Temecula's Electric Light Parade, Dec 10. Help celebrate the city's 14th anniversary as Santa's Electric Light Parade illuminates Temecula. You can submit an entry for a lighted vehicle or just be a spectator. Parade begins at 7pm. Jefferson Avenue between Del Rio Road and Overland Drive. 951-694-6480 SAGE RV PARK R CAMPGROUND In the foothlils of the Temecula Wine Colm* OPEN ALL YEAR • Full Hook-ups • Grocery Store • Amusement Arcade • Showers • Pool • Fishing • Propane • Hiking & Horse Trails • Playground • Hayrides 41601 BENTON RD., SAGE, CA !F!�open (909)767-0604 www.tucalota springs.com SAN BERNARDINO GLEN HELEN REGIONAL PARK 44 RV sites. 2555 Devore Rtl., San Bernardino, CA. 909-880-2522. TEMECULAMANCHO CALIFORNIA RANCHO CALIFORNIA ro sav DucoV\ N LAKE SKINNER RECREATION AREA 6040 acres. 300 campsites (200 with hook-ups,) fish- ing, boating, hiking/equestrian, camp store, cafe, mark ia, launch ramps and group areas. Pool open Memorial Day to Labor Day. Located 10 miles NE of Temecula. 909-926-1541. Reservations: 800-234-7275. VICTORVILLE MOJAVE NARROWS REGIONAL PARK 112 RV sites, 38 full hook-ups. 18000 Yates Road, Victorville, CA. 760-245-2226 YIJCAIPA YUCAIPA REGIONAL PARK 26 RV sites, 13 fully serviced. 33900 Oak Glen Road, Yucaipa, CA. 909-790-3127. M M fa an fo M St. au M fat inc m) m) wo Pet aro evc Eat boc ficl Ma del het and to n I CHI bA SMOL PA 51! THE PA COL A92 COR OUALn 129Ea: 0971 LJ 82 RV Jaumat FALL 2t Earle Stanley Gardner Mystery Weekend, Nov 6-7. Mystery buffs and crime solving fans of the Perry Mason Mysteries are invited to Old Town Temecula for the Erle Stanley Gardner Murder Mystery Weekend. Erle Stanley Gardner, the creator and author of the Perry Mason mystery series was one of Temecula's more famous residents. The weekend includes a mystery -solving contest, mystery writing competition, mystery writing and publishing workshops, a classic car show, Perry Mason characters acting up around town, and a Cowboy Poetry evening titled "Around Uncle Earle's Campfire." The prolific writer penned 151 books, including 82 about the fictional defense attorney, Perry Mason. From his house at Rancho del Paisano in the Temecula Valley, he would dictate his books into an audograph for his seven secretaries to transcribe. A renaissance man and practic- CHINO 1 I MORE POWE!MORE M.P.G.FOR YOUR MME ORTR 11A IjApnWafe AIR FILTERS Txsxsaisaoxs SMOG LEGAL HEADERS fjl TRAMSFER PACBRNM �Ylf/ FLOW, INC. ATank arket Fuel Tank Systems 22 YEARS EXPERIENCE "We'll beat anybody's Prices!" r5195 G STREET, CHINO, CA 91710 CALL I e 1 1 www.exhaustpro.com THE PAINT DEPARTMENT, INC. See ad page 86 COLTON ACACIA R.V. PERFORMANCE CENTER 295 N. Hermosa, Colton, CA 9; 909-824-9674 • Fax 909-825-l' CORONA QUALITY MOTORHOME RENTALS/SERVICE 129 East Grand Blvd., Corona, CA 92879 909-278-8868 • Fax 909-273-1486 ing attorney, Gardener founded the "Court of Last Resort" which aided prisoners who maintained that they had been unjustly convicted. He was also an avid outdoorsman who explored the Baja Peninsula regularly. His camping expeditions Actors perform clues to a Perry Mason mystery throughout Old Town to Baja led to the creation of some early version dune buggies. HEMET We service Matorhomes, Trailers & Campers Towing Systems • Remco - Electrical Appliance Repair - Insurance Work 1371 W. Acacia Ave., Hemet, CA 92543 Two blocks east of Mountain Valley RV Park 888-599.9169 • 909-929.2257 ONTARIO IRROW TRAILER SUPPLIES F Tn San Bernartlino Fw,. lw Anoeles OmAR10 � ., A AnaOH, I I W ONTARIO CHINO TR41LEa o AIRPORT COMPLETE RV SUPPLY STORE & SERVICE DEPT. 1363 W. Holt Blvd. Ontario, CA 91762............. ............... 909-986-3737 Throughout the streets of Old Town, actors perform clues to a Perry Mason mystery in antique stores, curio shops and restaurants beginning at I lam on both days. Amateur sleuths can pick up the list of clues and an entry blank from local stores or the museum to try their luck at guessing the culprit. All correct answers will be placed into a drawing of a $500 shopping spree in Old Town Temecula. Writing and publishing semi- nars are scheduled for Saturday and include talks from mystery writers, publishers, editors and agents. A mystery -writing contest is also being held. A classic car show for cars that have been traditionally restored is also planned. On Saturday, "Around Uncle Erle's Campfire" offers cow- boy poetry, western music and sto- ries. You can hear some Gardner SAN BERNARDINO ® • RV Accessories • Service • Installation "NNG•Camping Supplies WOPM. Your RV & Camping Supercenter Since 1966 1S1 E. Redlands Blvd., San Bernardino Ma 800.423.7S69 n D r 0 30 Z h J ., N I m CASTAWAY RV SERVICE 26068 Fifth Street, San Bernardino, CA 92410 909-889-3321•Fax 909-889-4121 SAN JACINTO Ramona Express Repair 1595 Potter Road, 909-654-3445 2 YUCAIPA 0 RIVERSIDE WIPPERT'S RV REPAIR 32645 Yucaipa Blvd., Yucaipa, CA 92399 RECOVERY ROOM RV INTERIORS 909-790-9598 ISeeadonpage86 See ad below 4: ... ! a, ALL CUSTOM WORK DONE ON OUR PREMISES! • Flexsteel furniture • Reupholstery • Day/night shades & drapes Valances & headboards • Floor coverings & mattresses Family owned & operated for 20 years! 144 Industrial Ave., Riverside, CA 92504 ww.recoveryroomrvacom (909) 688-4829 FALL 2004 83 ❑ W Ca L W 13 Z 5 Z I N r Q a 0 LL J Q A folklore here, too. Gardner died in 1970 and his ranch was later divided and sold. During his stay at Rancho del Paisano, he built numerous cabins and houses for the ranch hands and workers. An Orange County doctor owned the 780 acres that housed the buildings until 2001, when the Pechanga Band of the Luiseno Indians purchased the land for future development. 909-694-6412 www.temeculacalifomia.com SAN BERNARDINO — Harvest Fair: A trip Back to the Old West, Nov 6-7 and 13-14. Walk back in time to 1881. Old West style buildings line Main Street and old time ranchers, bankers, dance hall ladies, school marms and lawmen will be walking right along with you! An 1880's chuck wagon cooks up grub over an open fire and a nearby cowboy camp is full of wranglers who just rode into town hoping to paint it red! This is the Harvest Fair. The year is 1881; the president is James Garfield; Red Cloud is the Chief of the Oglala Sioux; there are 38 states in the union. The price of an acre of land is $1.25. The festival fun includes three stages of great entertainment all day long, old west shows, live country music, mariachi, square dancers, cloggers, folklorico dancers, Native American music and Old West living history groups. Enjoy the craft and antique booths that offer woodcrafts, pottery, paintings, jewelry, south- west crafts, antiques and more. Vintage cars on Nov 6, and rides in a Ford Model A are offered. A Veteran's Day Ceremony, Old West style, will be presented on Nov 14. Participants will wear the military color of the 1880's and they will bear solemn salute and render honors for our military ser- vice men and women. Great food and drink will be twvy,�si aaplti�� • Replace old stripin • RV detail services r • Photo murals & window mural • Box trailer design & graphics • Truck & auto pinstriping & graphics • Tow vehicle graphics • Commercial graphics & signs IIwu9) 3A-(6y5 iSan Bernarrdino CA 9240Bt II www.RVStrines-com RVSTRIPES®eman.ne; m RV DEALERS COLTON MCMANDN'$ RV See ad on, 909 ver& page 13 1312 RV Center Dc, Lot 16, 909-422-8970 LAKE ELSINOQE W EST MAQ1NA A UNIQUE RV PARK LOCATED ON HWY. 74 ®MM 4-'/2 MBes West of Interstate 15 on Southern For Reservations Phone California's Largest Natural Lake 909-678-1300 • Featuring 197 Full Hookup Sites with Cable Included In U.S. or Canada: • Jet Ski Rental • Launch Ramp • Tree Shaded 800-328-6844 • Small Mini -Mart with Groceries, Cold Beverages and Fax: 909-678-6377 Ice Cream • Small Tackle Shop Accessories Including Propane • Nic1500 upplycl.R. • 1500 Sq.Ft. Enclosed • n to and 1200 Sq.Ft. Open Pavilion for Meetings and Dinner/Dances 32700 Riverside Dr. • Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 L IBi1 offered. Everyone is encouraged to dress Old West or Country -Western style. General admission is $3. Children under 7 are free. 8088 Palm Lane, San Bernardino (off 4th Street, one block east of Waterman) 909-384-5426 www.harvestfair.net ■ HEMET XPRESS TRUCK IM & TRAILER SALES 4291 W. Florida Ave., Hemet, CA 92545 (888) 443-4054 SEE US. SAVE THOUSANDS W. Warranty and service is our specialty. Visit our web site and save even morel www.xPresstmcksales.com SEE CANYON LAKE AT WMGATEM.Com am 1�0 HOME BASE PARADISEI Impressive main lake waterfront home with 40' RV garage! Large family room with fabulous view deck, master suite with view deck. Canyon Lake is widely recognized as Southern California's recre- ational and residential paradise. Lots of photos, video clips, and information on the website. Maria Suttle, Agent, Prudential Canyon Lake Realty toll free: 1-877-700-5253 STORAGE FACILITIES' NORCO ST. AUGUSTINE RV AND SELF STORAGE 2587 Hamner Avenue, Norco, CA 92860 909-736-8044 ONTARIO RV Joumal APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIND CITY MANAGER � CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Anthony J. Elmo, Director of Building and SafeY61 DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report October 2004 Single Family Development Tracts The City continues to see tract development to be very active with 681 single family homes under construction. However, staff issued only 8 new tract houses in the month of Octoberwhich reflects the concentration of our residential developers in delivering their current inventory successfully by year end. Staff performed approximately 943 inspections on tract housing this past month. Multi -Family Development Fourteen (14) new apartments buildings were permitted in October representing approximately 134 new multi -family dwelling units. The Fountain Senior Apartment is progressing well. A very good looking project is the Temecula Creek Apartments and commercial center now under construction along Highway 79 South. Temecula Ridge Apartments off Moraga Rd and Rancho California Rd are beginning to see more activity as well as the Harveston Apartment project. There are currently 361 units under construction in Temecula. Commercial Development Five (5) new tenant improvement permits were issued representing 3,163 square feet of new business space along with two new commercial buildings in the area of 19,965 square feet. Hillcrest Academy has added a new classroom Baily's Restaurant is now open! Winco Foods also has now opened. TOTAL PERMIT AND INSPECTION ACTIVITY Staff issued 345 building related permits in October representing a construction valuation of $28,075,205 and fees collected of $477,426. The inspection staff performed over 4991 building inspections in October with only slight difficulty in maintaining our 24 hour response time. R:\BROC IXAGENDAIDEPARTMENTAL REPORT SEPT 2004.DOC 1 1114104 APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY �� DIRECTORFI CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of October, 2004. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report October / November 2004 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: November 23, 2004 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. John Warner Road Assessment District Under this project an assessment district was formed. This district includes the construction of street and storm drain improvements in the John Warner Road area. Outstanding p unch I ist i tems addressing resident complaints were addressed and completed the week of 10/18/04. All fieldwork is now complete. Filing the Notice of Completion is anticipated next month. 2. Rancho California Road Widening & Median Modifications East of Ynez Road The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. In addition, a dedicated right turn lane will be added on the eastbound direction on Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Final project close-out meeting is anticipated to be held the week of 11/15/04. Filing the Notice of Completion is anticipated next month. 3. Old Town Community Theatre This project will construct a 20,000 square foot community theater complex and refurbishes the existing Mercantile Building. The acquisition of 4th Street right of way is complete. All environmental permits have been obtained. Construction started on 3-3-04 and the allowable working days (14 months + 16 days) extends to 5-05-05. Work is progressing on the erection of structural steel, framing and site utilities. 4. Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements — Phase II This project will construct the storm drain triple box culvert and the channel improvements north of Loma Linda. As part of this stage the entire Pechanga Parkway, Phase II project will be environmentally cleared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Muirfiield Drive is temporarily closed to residents. Detour signs have been installed to direct the residents around the construction zone. Loma Linda Road will be repaved by the week of November 15. Pedestrians and school children have a separate sidewalk through the construction zone. The sidewalk has chain link fencing on each side to guide the pedestrians/school children through the construction zone. 5. Pechanga Parkway Phase 1113 Storm Drain Improvements (Wolf Valley Creek Channel - Stage 2) The project includes construction of a grass -lined channel/box culverts from Loma Linda Loma Linda Road will be repaved by the week of November 15. Pedestrians and school children have I C:\Documents and Settings\anUz.pyle\Local Seningffemporary Internet Fi1es\0LK28\0ctober-November.doc a separate sidewalk through the construction zone. The sidewalk has chain link fencing on each side to guide the pedestrians/school children through the construction zone. 6. Diaz Road Realignment Phase I, Traffic Signals Under this project, two traffic signals will be installed, one on Diaz Road at Rancho Way and the other one on Rancho California Road at Business Park Drive/Vincent Moraga. Also, a northbound lane will be added on Diaz Road from Rancho Way to Via Montezuma (Low Flow Crossing). Contractor has completed the paving on Diaz Road. Contractor has completed most of the work. The traffic signal poles have just been erected and the signals are waiting to be energized by Edison. 7. Vail Ranch Park (Near Pauba Valley School) - Add Amenities This project will add amenities, including play equipment, to the recently annexed Vail Ranch Park. A pre -construction meeting was held on June 7th. The contractor submitted the equipment information for review and approval. Equipment and Polygon Shade Structure have been ordered. Curb and sidewalk around the play area has been installed. Play equipment has been installed. Picnic tables, trash receptacles and benches have been delivered to the site. Shade structures frames were installed and the roofs are currently being installed. Irrigation and landscaping has begun. 8. Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - Phase II This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from south of Overland Drive to Rancho California Road. The design includes a complete reconstruction of the road within the project limits. In addition, problematic driveways will be reconstructed. Pavement rehab work on Diaz Rd is part of this project via Construction Change Order (CCO) No. 1 (per City Council meeting dated 6/22/04). Construction started on 07/06/04. The TCP was approved on 9/30/2004; night work began Sunday, 10/10. To date, Griffith has been unsuccessful in hitting any scheduled milestone. The majority of Ph 1 (i.e., west side) has been excavated & has not been protected by the contractor; certain areas have saturated subgrade. They were given direction to proceed w/ soil remediation; however, Griffith has elected to not proceed because the soil (as well as their dumping site) is saturated. Liquidated Damages started this week. We'll meet w/Peter Thorson regarding our options(i.e., steps in terminating contract). 9. Landscaping and Sidewalk On SR 79 South (Old Town Front Street to Pechanga Parkway) The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk, irrigation, and landscaping along State Route 79 South between Old Town Front Street and Pechanga Parkway. All work, including CCO's, was completed on 10/04/04. Acceptance of the work was submitted to Council on 10/12/04. Contractor's Affidavit of Completion of Work and Maintenance Bond have been filed. 10. Citywide Concrete Repairs - FY 2003/ 2004 This project continues the annual citywide concrete repairs program for City streets. Contractor has completed all of the concrete work. Once the contractor submits all of the necessary paper work, staff will recommend to the City Council project's acceptance. 11. Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide Under this project, traffic signals will be installed on Meadows Parkway at La Serena and at Rancho 2 CADocuments and Settings\anita.pyle\Local SettingsUemporary Internet Files\OLK28\October-November.doc Vista. Staff met with representatives of Temecula Valley Unified School District on November 20, 2003, to obtain their input on the installation of the traffic signal at the intersection of Meadows Parkway and La Serena. Bids were opened on July 13th. The lowest bidder was DBX, Inc. with a bid amount of $329,040.00. The City Council awarded the contract at the July 27th meeting. This project will begin construction in mid November 2004. The delay in construction is due to the availability of the traffic signal poles. 12. Veteran's Memorial This project will construct a Veteran's Memorial next to the Duck Pond. The artist and the concept have been chosen. Bid opening was held on 8/19/04; one bidder only, SFM Constructors, for $160.000. Construction began on 8/30/04. The project was substantially complete in time for the unveiling ceremony on 11/11/04. There is some lighting that needs to be installed yet, and some touch-up on some of the tile work. This will be complete the week of 11/15. SFM Constructors submitted a total of 24 Change Order Requests. Those will be evaluated and processed for inclusion in the final progress payment (November). Notice of Completion is anticipated to be filed early December. 13. Fire Station - Northeast Site (Roripaugh Ranch) This project will construct a new fire station in the north part of the City. The timing of the station will be impacted by the developer's ability to provide finished street grades, final site utilities, and finish all site grading. The project was awarded on 10-26-04 (200 Working Days) with an anticipated completion date of October of 2005. Work is estimated to start in December 2004. This is contingent on the developer completing grading, access and temporary utilities. 14. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson This project will widen Winchester road between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson Avenue. Itwill also add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. As of 11/15/04, one property (APN 909-281-019) remains in escrow; closing is anticipated before the end of November. Utility coordination and submittal review continue to constitute bulk of project activity. 15. Temecula Sports Complex A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built at the corner of Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow Way. B ids were o pened o n S eptember 16, 2 004. T he contract was awarded to Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. at the September 28, 2004 Council meeting. The contract award amount is $13,365,055.51. Notice to Proceed was given on 11/1/2004. Barnhart is mobilizing and will be installing SW PP BMP's and the construction fencing through 11/18. Oncethisworkis complete they will begin grading activities. Project progress meetings have been scheduled for Wednesdays at 9:00 AM. Design and specifications for the artificial turf are approximately 70% complete. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS NONE 3 C:\Documents and Settings\anita.pyle\Local Settingffemporary Internet Files\OLK28\October-November.doc PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Improvements — Phase II (SR 79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) to its ultimate width from the Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Pechanga road. The City is working with Caltrans' Local Assistance and City's Environmental Consultant to re-classify the Preliminary Environmental Document Classification (NEPA) of the project to Categorical Exclusion with required technical studies (involving Federal action). The City met with the consultant to review the remaining plan check comments. 100% plans should be submitted to the City within a couple of weeks. The Planning Department completed Addendum No. 3 to the Wolf Creek EIR and the Notice of Determination (NOD) for the project. The Addendum and NOD were needed to satisfy all CEQA requirements for the project. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) is requiring that the City process an individual permit in addition to a nationwide permit for the Wolf Valley Creek Channel. The individual permit will be provided to the City the week of October 18. This project was divided into two stages. The first stage is to construct the storm drain triple box culvert and the channel improvements north of Loma Linda. The second stage will construct the remaining street improvements and drainage structures. Construction of this stage will startonce the first stage is completed. 2. Pechanga Parkway - Muirfield Drive Traffic Signal Under this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Pechanga Parkway at Muirfield Drive. Traffic signal poles have been ordered and 90% plan check comments were returned to the consultant on November 12. Final design plans will be submitted to the City the week of November 15 for final comments and signature of plans. 3. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. A separate parcel has been created for the library for bond purposes. The City was approved for funding by the State on October 28, 2003. TCSD will coordinate the submittal of plans between the architect and the State. There were 16 respondents to the Geotech RFP. We are negotiating with one of the consultants. We also received 21 responses to the RSQ for general contractors and we are currently reviewing these RSQs. Letters were sent to all applicants postponing qualification announcements due to the high volume of respondents. Plan check corrections from Building and Fire have been resolved and the design consultant is working on the final drawings. These will need to be submitted to DSA. 4. Pauba Road Improvements — Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The City has reviewed the 100% Design Plans submitted by the consultant. Specifications are under review. Plans were sent to all utilities and utility issues are being addressed. Work is being coordinated with the library project, which resumed since State funds have been secured. A new RCWD waterline is under design to service the library project. It will tie into an existing line that 4 CADocuments and Settings\anita.pyle\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28\October-November.doc ends just west of Margarita Road. TCSD has requested the water line be extended past the Library. This extension was added to the second submittal, which was received on October 4, 2004. Comments are being returned to the consultant this week. 5. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. Coordination with RCFC & WCD and the Corp of Engineers is required. Staff has reviewed the 30% design plans and plan check comments were returned to the consultant for revisions and re -submittal to the City. 6. Bridge Barrier Rail Upgrade, Rainbow Canyon Road over Pechanga Creek/Del Rio Road over Empire Creek This project will replace the existing barrier rails of the Rainbow Canyon Bridge over Pechanga Creek and the Del Rio Road Bridge over Empire Creek. Project plans and specs are 100% complete and are ready to bid. Caltrans Local Assistance group was provided with copy of submittals for the third time. We finally got confirmation that it was sent to Caltrans HQ for Authorization to Construct. Construction Authorization was received and specifications are being updated so that the project can go out to bid. 7. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site A fire station will be built at the Wolf Creek Site. Re -design kick-off meeting was held on 10/13/04 between City, Standard Pacific Homes (SP), and STK (Project Architect). SP and STK are to coordinate on information transfer. Re -design and plan check estimated duration is 3 to 4 months. 8. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail This project will build portions of the equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek within City limits. The City has received a federal grant of $1,214,000. Caltrans has given the City the "Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering." We are working with US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and Riverside County Flood Control to coordinate the trail design with the Murrieta Creek Improvement project. The City received comments from Caltrans on the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) on April 22, 2004 and is working on addressing them. The Natural Environmental Study (Minimal Impacts) (NES (MI)) was submitted to Caltrans on April 7, 2004, no comments have been received to date. The PES response to comments was completed and resubmitted to Caltrans on September 23, 2004. 9. State Route 79 South Medians Under this project medians will be constructed on State Route 79 South within the City of Temecula limits. PDC is making the 1 st plan check (30%) corrections. PDC has submitted an alternate storm drain plan for City review. 10. Guardrail Installation and Replacement On Rainbow Canyon Road In this project, old guardrails will be replaced and new guardrails will be installed in needed locations on Rainbow Canyon Road within the City of Temecula. PS&E is 95% complete. NES (MI) was submitted to Caltrans on 10/18/04, approval is expected 11/24/04. Upon approval, Caltrans will approve the PCE/CE in compliance with NEPA. City has filed a NOE with the County to meet CEQA S C:\Documents and Settings\anita.pyle\Local Settings\Temporary Interne[ Files\OLK28\October-November.doc requirements; 30-day period ends 11/19/04. PS&E certification and Request for Authorization (to construct) have been initiated. 11.Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping Under this project, 10,000 square feet remnant parcel west of Front Street, which was created by the realignment of First Street, will be landscaped. Plans are essentially complete Advertising is anticipated in late November. Construction would begin early January. 12. Rancho California Road Widening, Old Town Front Street to 1-15 (Southside) This project will provide a right turn lane for southbound 1-15 motorists and explore the possibility of providing a dual left turn lane from westbound RCR to southbound Front Street. Alternatives study is complete and the City has chosen alternative no. 1. (widen the south side of the entire length between Old Town Front and 1-15). An MND (CEQA) was completed and a Notice of Determination was sent to the County on 10/11/04. Right of Entries to perform a geologic investigation on the roadway embankment (two properties) were sent out at the end of September. 13. Main Street Bridge Over Murrieta Creek (Replacement) This project will replace the existing Main Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek. The freeboard issue that was a potential stumbling block has been resolved, and the bridge profile will remain unchanged. Design process is ongoing; consultant is working toward 70% design. No significant changes since last month; 100% design plans is anticipated January 2005. 14. Vail Ranch Middle School Basketball Court Lighting This project will add lights to the basketball courts at Vail Ranch Middle School. No bids were received at the bid opening due to the scheduling constraints contained in the specifications. The project will be re -bid this spring for construction during the summer break. 15. City Maintenance Facility and Corporate Yard Under this project, an expansion of the maintenance facility will be built on the property adjacent to City Hall. Design of Phase 1, the parking lot, is scheduled for completion by mid October with construction scheduled to begin in December. Concurrent with phase 1, schematic design of phases 1 & 2 (the expansion of the maintenance yard and the new building) will be progressing. Consultant is preparing responses to DRC and Business Park Association in hope of getting site plan approved. Once the Site Plan is approved, Phase 1, the parking lot, will be bid and constructed. 16. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. Staff is modifying the plans to incorporate the Phase I improvements. Right of Way acquisition process is ongoing. Plans have been sent to the utility companies for their review. 17. Bus Bench Upgrades Under this project, bus benches and shade structures will be installed and existing ones will be upgraded at various locations. Project research on locations of current bus stops, existing bus bench/shade structures, bus bench/shade structure costs and RTA routes is complete. B us 6 CADocuments and Settings\anita.pyle\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28\October-November.doc bench/shade structure design and location options were reviewed and a report with recommendations was prepared. The design and locations were approved. Staff is in the final stages of preparing the construction bid documents including ADA and permitting requirements. 18. Localized Storm Drain Improvements This project will fix the drainage problem at the south end of Front Street (at the MW D easement). Baseline right of way and utilities are established. Staff is preparing a conceptual design for presentation to MWD (since it will be on top of their waterline). 19. Traffic Signal at SR79 South and Country Glen Way Under this project, a traffic signal will be installed on State Route 79 South at Country Glen Way. Plans and specifications have been submitted to Caltrans to obtain the Encroachment Permit. 20. Long Canyon Detention Basin - Access Road This project will construct an access road to the Long Canyon Detention Basin being maintained. Surveys of the site are being prepared and design will begin shortly. 21. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - FY 2004/ 2005 This project continues the annual pavement rehabilitation program for City streets. Preliminary research is being performed in order to begin preparing plans. PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE 1. I-15/ SR 79 South Interchange -Project Report (PR) This project will modify the 1-15/ SR 79 South Interchange to accommodate projected future traffic. This is the next step of project development after the completion of the Project Study Report. RBF Consulting (firm that completed the Project Study Report) submitted the PA & ED Proposal. Comments from City and Caltrans were sent to RBF regarding the PA&ED Proposal. The revised proposal from RBF is expected in late November. Upon receipt, negotiations to finalize the design contract will begin. Signed contract is anticipated in early January. 2. French Valley Parkway Overcrossing and Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Preparation This project will construct an interchange between Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/1-215 split. The consultant continues to work on the Project Report. The consultant submitted a screen check for the Project Report (PR), New Connection Report, Fact Sheet, Flood Plain and Scour Analysis Report, and Traffic Operations Analysis to both F HWA a nd C altrans. W e a re a Iso continuing to pursue the acquisition of a number of properties to protect them from development. The work on the environmental document continues. 3. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula City Limits and Diaz Road Extension This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murrieta Creek crossing between 7 CADocuments and Settings\anita.pyle\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28\October-November.doc Winchester Road and the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Riverside County Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. The Consultant and Staff met with Riverside County Flood Control to discuss possible alignments. The consultant is currently awaiting data from Riverside County Flood Control in order to complete the work on the first draft of the alignment study. In order to proceed with the design of Diaz Road Extension for the proposed college, the alignment study was restarted with the existing information. The consultant is preparing a base map for the Diaz Road extension alignment. PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON -HOLD 1. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1.15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit -ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is revisiting the merits of this project in light of the Project Study Report for French Valley Parkway Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to accommodate the new Interchange. This project is suspended indefinitely. 8 CADocuments and Settings\anira.pyle\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28\October-November.doc W W 'N^ V/ NwN V ON w a Y O 4 J z U Z w0 25 LL OU W -a U w 0 S E v :2 E o m O m= LL C 0v Eccm C°Tvy v mcC cmmDTn _anmCvjvcmmy m rO Co o Z pv -r J m amOav m — >>K = J'❑ov O m 3mE m apyCmmym E❑mui m O O N O ONq • Omy 62 ° >m E v O of V m o o m m u v m c n U i '°^OyOv > 7 O o J to 0 a u°we`5UmNmm nCmm mrCJmmy m m Y p C L O d C` p y m 3 0 y m C m y - O m m` a y N � U C U m a T m� y0 C m m L v O E v« E 'p C ❑ •m L C m .� = y i- J v« N m 0 M 3 OI W '� 6 G C m y c m -CQX rn_ n n E m o y °mE € v -! -> mLL LE 3 '� y° U v a Ola O a a o a CCLLU m c c m C v6 O v y L U O� m m O > p U O 3 m J V a p3mm N nY U m m3myCU Lm mmO O 2 C O �%O O v Ud yC En O0 NU a CJ U ovyv a"md3O imdO'_^ n,vOc ycON'l m3u` Oc E y OI LyLyNp 0 LmmNovm mmmO. -zWi^Wy] E O a'ov 0c c u o OLLLou ypamUumv cW.c NmEE £Wavy Luy vNm c y uyc a w c o v-C cQ° '.nup_2 5 O o O v o yc EyL 0 O o v "'uv ❑a OO o mi 3 -Uc=«mmm?n O U N O ; v E y p a2om> CnyVp VCy m t C O :. rmoC2 ~Kvm vCmv° a_0U E cvevm 3 E Ye0 C c 0 C Ov m N0 WmO `am =Oy «c.E N(wNvEyuvn C a (� Z m O E y y> `o O L uv aui 'uoy u ayv va"V ETo wL «OHv vmE Lc = °o w m w aj c ' �° a m e c� m� n� v m a m n n m c J u 3 a c> c m J o c_ o r Q >o r c y o ui c m t 0 v 2 o m E c m m 0 v t � a y v'-v " O m Z iz iz U d O> F J d U �- U .L. i- J U N .L. L .L. ❑ w❑ w U .L.. r m m c 4; d e a e a a e a oa 3 a a e a O O O O O m O O O� 0 O N O 0 \ O r W ^' z Q m m 'az N 41 A m ❑f y N m w wN .. o o co mm mt N O n m m OI y a a v u m N y e m ^ E 0 C n L a ` M A. h ❑ m IO m ❑ m q U N fn Z a EU mm Ev o m T z :a rn9 mF 'c m~ ai'u a N y m �a N v o „= u > Y E a K c c a 0 a U 5 A m U= t d a ci 0c dnmyOo mm JUJEm nJaa y mYE o aL71f-cc myvv p ❑ >v3vp NC aYaL� Q0 o, J o E ua ' ° m° Z O worMtau ° adaamm> Sm�opC Sam2vC .cm. 0p I0-EENC3 (If E uN I , E 2 E yO CM O O N c0J my Kc'0 00 > °o `E c E E 00 E a E0ci a o >¢`n O V M N d a C a a E CD LL O ON N W Q l"' a J U Z WO m2 F- LL OU N S L O h= C u y W W O N .0. O 6 f/J L N N N t t T « d J U C r LL_ O O. Ur W°b FS W~ O « oF- o"WU O da:O .C. :w•' vKaocON amWvN "N `0NyN ` o uN o nr N JmC�5 on > cnmo m E °; oE m N u o m No o 0N n oW `°.ouC E N w > W U a CL X N d aNE NN oWc JrnN NaE o N—W E E O N U N C am W N CO N N '°OuoCNgyp N "rCU�i ... :'.. m E y cU v v>m O L o N yoo E a 9v� YJCco" > C 'Vo Na>>0L WU O E d N v O O E Z.0 3 U U a o a 0Cm UMEE o m y E Nm N O '^N C« N o n C ❑ N mo O6. O N U W 1 E— po N O ° ° oC yOQ r 0 w w 0 E D"a_OcV U m E m LVNEL O EJ o ay Z ° U O 2 O N > wN CN W O U` a > Q ZO W E Q� NNo Uo N°° w E N n o Lm oam Jom U v Om a U .c ? Do O v m E 3 a m '- w� °0 w w c mmi0 o o U o E w c o v m E a u ° 3 ° o o ' .N- N No o 0t °ymc°3uo«c 0°n N ar ` J O O m O 4 a% Nt Z VI O V 3L N O m O CrnCm m pNo O n N c m 0 ° o E ovo m 0Oa~ m« a u o o c x yLn w' o °= 0N2E U` m y o a ono rn iN N E C w Y Ed C J O W w O O 3m o p E a 3 o N u o 0 ¢ 3 U o U N co) w m m E n > ZU o— L m mt> 3 a ou N ¢ mU 7 v T T' Q Q Os a. UI' y 00 0 0 �0 00 00 LJ W z m 0 '> Z = a s h m o` 0 2 C7 UJ n m m n a z T~ C 0 � C _ N O O O y m N o 2 C Z H m C m mc. N q O c m o N u n e o m E u o E 0 c m c C4 z C4 o 0 > m o m o W:L .. w E E w a m w Q U : jsj C C m N 3 p m C m J L'm U m N O C N QC4 E n a U ` .� in c m m 2 .20 '° ," w c Z o f « u o o m> O J H N N r cm '.F ° J N V +Wj. m« C'IC- fON� °� V> ma m OI �Uln ua E m ELL c o o c CL V r O r J O N U a .. c a N m .. r .. L w .21 C O K m O N N O n w w m rfo 9$ o N m 10 L u o i20 $C m m m m 6 ` = o N VC C O UU cc m >� O Q:U O 3 mx z H o U « ^ 99 0 Q N .y V 0 0 a E: co LL N Or P'7 \ Lu Q a nt rnE cv O a-� `m E t o E E F' o i c?°H c N 3 d m a9i g c 0 N ° 3 d c p E u O d '° "m m n v n v m a F- u C C d Jrg 3 a o v O W v a ° rn L d N rm 'm y O E o m rn S?£ D N m y y N y v E a E o 9 o v L c_ v c v m a m m m v 0 r OIU Uj O n c d C 3 3 L N L a E W NO d❑ 9 W O d N O E "O d N O 3 NLs N V N C d j L 3 y a y U {UW�t N t rn O_ r d d m .= E c d y 0 tq c O1 d •`dJ .dC.. v y d x t E= ° v n.'m' 3 v E 9 5 0 3¢ t m a o m d¢ 6 E d O d C rO E C g U C C O. C N d J O y C d N d d O U : N 0 U r " 2 6 L 'y�-° d O• A U N �p _ y E O L E m OI n r J C C N d b b_ E E N C d J 0 c N d d 3 U >mv ~ OI O. V O o u W OI E O Y ` O. w y d N ram. O` OI N O r d O C a ❑ 9 d d 0_' d U .d.. y y O 3 E> 3 C W y T 'O O N U d E L W Z E 'O N J 'O ¢ S d V IL C O. �" (� 'O > O 2 N N d C OI N J t t U d c O .d. O t` O~ y J C N y j U C =0x ❑ a T .. N a Z' v ° SE avE Y v d E `o O E `m N E v o y v° c 1 u 'o ° y a '^ °> a c n° w m° rn w c❑ v E `�. y N T d a>i •L• « 0 6 L "O 6 n N C ° d Z N N E r¢ d ?.' i d d > CO ° Z O N 0 C N V N d d 'O 1.. d C Y O N O 3 J d d 0: ❑ t N U u a w '� m H o ° 30 c c 3 o a 0 E > v �NUdY O NJ yyEd aNdod 02)VE 'vOm d w F. 'io3cNys Nu ` C E �yd vy° CvdW 'vCy tLDN oCuO Cm o � o° u ° `Ov E ULC COL L•..CCO W O E rC0 T l —«q Ld U F-ON O d L . yO F- OZ VQ O T OI Z CI �:' Q• _ : w; ll++ h O O N W d q 12 p Y d CO d L0 m O'z '.CD ri N N C fq d m; fp 0 0. -: w m d a ~ m m J O d b Q o > m 7-5 c _ N U � Q O j '�'. d L L ❑ a o a ❑ a i F4 O ....///yyam3. d 0 O _v co '� oo.v E$ E U p N W E N p a C 2 : j J N C N Nr� �c9 d p Z -0 p�.N- Lm �» 'I� f4 `mmU❑ o `m3 a¢ Evc N m p ..r r an a .. r Ja toa 2 LU amof o ao Fa a?a` h ca a. as a w 3 ; a - a co LL O le W CD a U W w LL O u O O N W W W w a YNN O Z O 2 F- L) W 7 a o o z c v v JO 0- w D o t A 10 v 3 L E N= m o a 9 r°n o 8 O 0` U v c u J V v N N N j L U H E L« n 0 C n d W °i d b o m `O` ¢ c Y v 3 E. i w n ^-' o n$ ti m �_ y« LL m `o a o` m n U m y c m E _ �_ 3 3 E v E E v z O n E S y a L u .o '^ « v 2 E °u E o E E K u c S �^ we m O1 3 c.00Z. y �a m m H v m �'o. c y y v w- Eo-0 m `o .� 3 v c� `m m9 n U mOo v b Z rn v` -OD E �.m c s U d a v y g E p N o v O N O L r ill 9` n U O U N 6 U O E O N m ,LE-' WN ah LO N Zy Cm A« o Q000 U N >A O« O T m W C W O E s u o E of 2= E J n t 2 E °rn c¢ a Q a v= o N m m m D o y o 0 `o � m n � H o a m c c u v m° ° u w a v K j$ Q w o r U o °. `m a> y a � E ` 3 o n o v F"' m c m c m 0 c c c E c v !_^ m n a T° 7 ,aro p E n F: c p C) n c Or m ° °' m a c m m c n n a Q v w 9 0 O1� 'sl'. «rn3 rn10 n 3Yp H N�`°d� 3a WOZ�`o x a Ml 'tn m vn4:° N C J n N OI y b m O u m ti c m Y y Z c t voi`m m L y c a p¢ y c a C N U U O Z m w O o u E=m rW aTU mdi oon E Ggm E75 n o Evv ¢ a°m m u m E a mv a ooO x0v N M° n NQ 9�0. T O O C a a y v .p v� U E�v ;.�U UNwOv> wyoywO v`C ey C LI-Utm�°m m am�m�$mUpamm OoO SNO pv`c it 0vm WKC ma E m LmC 310a �Qa m W 0 0 �d N d p T m 10 N 25 0 0 a ;C7 0 m N m E c c z m ` �m ` m �� �¢ o � = a> = a> O o K 3 ` � N 0 a c o n O u m u C O C OI 6 OJ FY m O Y Y m m a « z N J 6 m d W m a yOj L m U m 0 o a p ) .y v m w m c E « m = o y y c W C O M m T R N J « y O J O N a C m o f C C o o m C C J m o a 22» wUU C7UU O Q_ d: fV 00 a 3 3 3 N 3 N 3 N 3 Li co le LL O ON In W Q � a W W U W 2 W LL O 'J m C O m O m r C C N O m O) m L y O m 0 y N C m V 0 O ' Z a� '� a z' m u a t m a> Cm Qc ° vc E .° °mm^> rnm o E a ° u o Q 000 0 r m ` wm 2 mO OVC N C OI r m N E C J m a v_ a N m C a > `m A u a N w e c m c m n a 3 m y m v c C W 3 n O w w N> w a m K N m U « �/ N «> C C m U« C O) O) L m J y m .. L m 0 V n a m C B o v $ C W p5_ LL L.. m O 0 N .0O m O 'E� am `po vc o o Nc a orn n a OraE E m c m mwm w apc o O o ` a C E Vl. E- EU N O N W N m m O L d y a c OU C .J.. U j C N N vi 4 O O N m O F p 3 c E ynj l a m o o m m O u 'w m v c E o n$ c c ° o N C W m c v rn n a E rn rn c y n Gsl rn U O E N n m N N O a N ( N0 v m N m m C O « U C V N J \ m O a a y N w O 46 OJ� Unm Nm O Em Lmm m mO AOE 6 O 6 O .N «m C LC aCOm C m c a o E N U d y W w o v n v o u `w v o � w °� o m v n m E£ n y y t o `m O U TJ E V E 6 m N m U .m. °� Y E V C w N U C C o.p O m C 3 0 dE��00C CU aCs Npm Nmd�Jt�hm nO mm NO m E O m E O `m 0 L 3 W« m U Z W L O N p E 3— m N Dip 0 N N O 0 0 Z u u O m U L« > f0 3 u m ,.t. a Tn a 3 0 Q V- � a 0 0- w 0 m V � Z Z 2 Ot a. U; wy o Q O !V � .;Z mm Aa O m 2 m O m 0 O E m m E o d p" W a CO 4J J Q m Q C c E N m y^ c n r m c a N U N � m r 0 N N O V u LL LLj E a Q E v 'c oa w c > W� a N O C m v /y� % O FG 'W O > OI >O O m U W O Cma E O fyt/-1 pv z r E c (If E rn�ON mm OEm wz E o E pym at: .0 n m Q o s m m m J Of p W N E m E 1 m 0 0 m La p m 0 0Moo a o > 10 ow Im a. m z q o o p 4 4 $ O m 4 o a'.' a N a a a e a: a W LL N Or <O \ W Q � a W U 0 a r Z W 2 W O a 2 n a E c v o m m 6 6 t K m K W 3 E c « v 0 0 O O m E m m o m o m w n« o `o « U a LL o m o : `v m_ E o 3 a o E c m E 3 E OC O W m O L (' Zc OVram.a W_�mmma 6.. 6H c o v m t c E a 3 o m m C rn .. v U m S '.°� U C U A N U y n C O E D N C m O m °o rn v n« E VJ: m E LL« 0 i Ol W LL y �" r0 OI 2« v q N p F C C v J O m N E c E o m J m o° o a c° c o` m a o a w m 3 a U U 3« N v ci Jo m m c u N v�w m E N E v O W 0 m m m 020 O m_ c H� c 6 Oa C E - o U vu c 3° Ov amvm Cm ° 0 E E o v Ca a`o c c v m o v 5= EOE E n L L^ a m C J> a N u m a a a L m C L 0 ° O L X B L y X X X O O C F :f CmHUf U� HWLLNH CTW VNQV m Wm nS Z Z fO v p a. N 1� T T p0.' IC9 o f m E o o n N m Q m Q n N N m V L N p Zj F O °o A >�o dm � o ^ E o 00 L Oao = v ya -. E N M x p v v Z v m E o V m 3 u v E c= W 3 v a c > 75 N U u' o E m 0 5 y m o E E v ag Jm o W o - mY � m �ro9E'�"'� a. a 0._. o � c c° a ❑ p m o g U m u u 0 r a cole O LL O ON N W Q a J x �z U Z w0 5; P- w H N LL H OU w H 3 U 0 a z w 2 w O w a 2 J Q F- a Q U 00 a LL NOr oD \ W a� a {L 7 U w a n m o E E L J m g u o o m c v d >o n v a u m n E o m v m v m v T O u o m° n E a 0 c m v o v n`16 `o ° c c m UD am tv ccI �n0 v .o ae v -avy2 o ° x o a v°c N C9. an W m q o m c n o 0'a m ami c m m m O HR a m v w m« p a t N .0 m c mu «0 c u >- > c _= c a m NV Nmm0LL nTQ2J nOn Uom > 3 0 C M C O m U a 'y m O L N Q0 O 0m Q c ° OLL O u O O am «m oa° o oo m cvm Nm mm ` vm nE hN V m y QJO.6U 0« 2 O mC O mm a L OU mU U m m0 0} Cm po E C° m ov LUCm m U -S v E n Ci C ' W C m i O J O N O E uv cm N a0o c 9 E° , « m� 3 N0 ou c0v mm $m v u oaq u mO O rn N C O t:O O J v° :mmcO OlmmC g o E u 0 mpCma . v o mmm0O'1 p❑ a0 Umy6am c VO rq mmC x v J q a c > c o a x 8 m E n (7 a 5 a m cm a° S c m iL O a m a H m v 5 U° b n¢ m m `m v CL g g a a a a g a a a e z< z z z z z z z z z z 0.a U wg WFa a m a w 9 c c c 'o F z z z z z z t? z t? 4' '.O d O O O �04 m m 04 m J J J m m N w a T m 1[1 m O m U LL Q 'Yi 6 N c C N F V J LL A U 0 0 0 N .N L .� m L m L Q O u 0 N N m° C W ` m u w um g ma a' c m ar c 0 m w O O o m K v m i. O W F K O` oo a m a N c E a❑ a« a s = pim N pm`� 0 «a m v c« a u C O m K m > C O n > O m m 6 m O W aof O 7 W U Z a.: J M O O N O N a MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: 011� Brad Baron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: November 2, 1004 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - October, 2004 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of October, 2004: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns Bl. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement V1. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. 139 New and repainted legends B. _0 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 27 2 0 10 3,295 23 226 100 11 1,797 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 90 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 34 service order requests for the month of September , 2004. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 347 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of October, 2004 was $ 71,098.00 compared to $ 29,677.00 for the month of September, 2004. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 19,004.00 51,134.00 960.00 cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) R WAI TA[M OAC RMW3-200 Q\ OdER 0 W YW J Oao 3 O N U U a m M N MO� a 0UY r u Z Z W rL 0 ' W 0 0 W Y oorno �o m ono 9 0o mrnc+�m� v v o V V N m m W N N m O pz O _ 0 N V Como O 0 0 0 0 M a M 7 M m 0 W N N m 0 eA -1 m Cl! r «> m. W U W C ix W L LU 1 O Z OOQO V Oyy f0 QUO 00 N NN 0OM V 001 ^ N W ^m m m Ln v r O r M N m N » O 000 O O O O O O O O 0 N N a:M N N T m 0» n W' N n M n IL W. N O O O O O O O OO m c W m N m m N m m N n? M N M M N N Q, 000 0o a�n o mm�nmom rn Y M N M J � U o O N LL QN zQa N�yV mm mm 0Q LL�cm CO a) cr W z�a� O � >O rO O ` L)Z N� UO U � �mO Z o ��H m0 U E$ ��N 0U O MiN U m'o `E2O O nm0 K �r0 Op rno�6 Ei0 �r UOr o nnr r rrr wmUr0�zamc� r N y �a 0 C` J ¢ p m Y ZLU N 7 LL > z z¢ 00¢ > f J W J W U w �ZMLL Q0 IL w 0 NF LU O y W U J} 0 N � LL N V N N N �tf W O O O O O O O 19 V OW If1 M O N O O 10 OI y N NW O N O Of O 10 Ifi fp d Of N W W O O O w IA D1 V O O fD �� It1 N N D1 Ltf W f0 Oi A OI 6 ' t0 AW W Oi O A O O O W N N M 0 W O 6 a N CI fD a r N O O 0 O O O O C O N T O O V f h Ox W W am W W O N O N A N O O p A (� W rs w W O N fD f0 O N N I9 O h g M O OJ A r% O A Oi A N w A N N O A A t9 N N t9 W N m I �t1j M M H A M ~Q LL N W W W w W yi W W LL o 0 0 09 Qa a N U 0 V 0 o O O W � f O � J O ti a 300 U Ir 0 0 0 OLL o w w o» y O UZ 0 0 0 Fw a O 0 LU J 3Ca OZ U O O O C O am am N O O O O CD O N O O O GD O O 10 O M A 0! O O! O Ci O CD O W a s 19 M1 m N am � O am yy y O w O M G 0w M F Y- m Lq M w O V W O M 00 N 19 N w N W O w 00 w w w U O 00 N O O ta0 t0+1 N T N OOf yAy O O ce A N W G w O J F 300 U d d) d N 01 9 •• •` 0 •• R 0 N O 0 d C d a OL a a 0 C m C 00 m WU L W y F 2 3 y P y H W N W ui W J J d O i LL O LL O W F w J LU W , y. Z p p F ¢ IL Q F W ZQZ W U 7 JQw = W y y < O j a g 9 U F 7 W Y W F W O O W ~ O W y K Z F- U' W y W 2 3 4 p y OJ LL 0 ya c x aZ a x z LLB, w p 0 N K STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of October, 2004 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST SIZE ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT Date: 10/04 CITYWIDE MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS, TRASH & WEED ABABEMENT ALONG CITY R-O-W'S TOTAL COST $ 10,000.00 # 5402 Date: 10/20/04 EMERGENCY WORK TREE & BRUSH REMIVAL DUE TO HEAVY RAINS 10/28/04 CITYWIDE # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 2,179.00 Date: 10/04 A.C. SAW CUTTING FOR IN-HOUSE PATCH CREW CITYWIDE # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 6,825.00 CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING Date: 10/08/04 YNEZ ROAD AT VALLEJO AVENUE EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO C.M.P. CULVERT PIPES # 5401 TOTAL COST $ 37,500.00 Date: 10/25/04 TO EMERGENCY WORK REMOVE SILT & DEBRIS FROM DESILTING 10/28/04 CITYWIDE PONDS & RECONSTRUCT; REMOVE SILT FROM # 5401 DUETO HEAVY RAINS STREETS TOTAL COST $ 6,734.00 CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Date: 10/24/04 1) EMPIRE CREEK CLEAN ALL SILT & DEBRIS FROM CHANNELS 2) CALLE MEDUSA CHANNEL AND DISPOSE OF TOTAL COST $ 6,900.00 # 5401 Date: 10/24/04 SERVICE LEVEL "R" ROADS GRADE ALL ROADS WITHIN SERVICE LEVEL "R" # 999-5402 TOTAL COST $ 960.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $ 51,134.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $ 19,004.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 960.00 RU1AINTAIMMOACTRPI W3-20N\ OBER CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2004 DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL TONS 10/04/04 AVENIDA BARCA ATA DEL REY A.C. OVERLAY 400 2.5 10/05/04 VIA CORSICA A.C. OVERLAY 375 2 10/06/04 CALLE PINA COLADA AT DEL REY A.C. OVERLAY 340 2 10/07/04 30385 DEL REY A.C. OVERLAY 245 2 10/12/04 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET / RIO NEDO R & R A.C. 345 3 10/13/04 RIO NEDO AT AQUA VISTA A.C. OVERLAY 480 3 10/14/04 RIO NEDO AT AQUA VISTA A.C. OVERLAY 802 3.5 10/25/04 VIA CORSICA AT DEL REY R & R A.C. 308 7 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 3,295 TOTAL TONS 23 RWAINTAINIWKCMPLTDVSPHALT.RPR\0.05\OC OBERS CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2004 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 10/05/04 AREA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 23 UNDERSIDEWALKS 10/11/04 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 46 CATCH BASINS 10/13/04 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 17 CATCH BASINS 10/18/04 CITYWIDE "RAIN' CLEANED & CHECKED 50 CATCH BASINS 10/19/04 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS 10/20/04 CITYWIDE "RAIN' CLEANED & CHECKED 36 CATCH BASINS 10/27/04 CITYWIDE "RAIN' CLEANED & CHECKED 34 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 226 RU AINTAIMWKCM=D\CATCHBAS\ 05\0C OBER CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2004 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 10/04/04 TARGET CENTER REMOVED 220 S.F. OFGRAFFITI 10/07/04 27911 JEFFERSON REMOVED 165 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/07/04 27780 JEFFERSON REMOVED 300 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/07/04 28999 JEFFERSON REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/12/04 26810YNEZ REMOVED 145 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/13/04 MORAGA AT EDISON STATION REMOVED 240 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/18/04 PEPPERCORN AT DEER HOLLOW REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/18/04 HWY. 79 SO. AT FRONT STREET REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/25/04 AVENIDA DE MISSIONES AT RIO TEMECULA REMOVED 120 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/25/04 TARGET CENTER REMOVED 78 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 10/25/04 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD BRIDGE REMOVED 500 S.F. OF GRAFFITI Ll TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 1,797 TOTAL LOCATIONS 11 R:\MAIN AIMWKCMPLTD\GRAMTI\00.05\OCTOBER O O O O O O O G O OD r� t0 Lr) RT m N r o O o0 .. �O C, 100 a a U L l� � O O O\ •• CO �p 7 N •--� 1� .� lD V V1 M .-i �+j 69 69 69 fA 64 fA 69 69 V3 69 i+ COO L A d cc 0Z0 U W O Z H U O F IL w Cl) C7 a J W 2 'a cc IL a a m w U. M 7 b O� O wz �(U Q rnUU 00 �O h h V N M v1 N O\ N EL N N T bA O CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2004 DATE REC'D LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 10/04/04 40210 DONOMORE COURT S.N.S. DOWN 10/04/04 10/04/04 28011 JEFFERSON AVENUE CHANNEL CLEANING 10/04/04 10/04/04 31965 CORTE SOLEDAD DEAD TREE 10/04/04 10/04/04 30244 DEL REY ROAD A.C. REPAIRS 10/04/04 10/05/04 45501 CLUBHOUSE DRIVE TREE CONCERN 10/05/04 10/05/04 43529 RIDGE PARK DRIVE FENCE REPAIR 10/05/04 10/05/04 30510 MIRA LOMA DRIVE SIDEWALK REPAIR 10/05/04 10/05/04 VIA LOBO CHANNEL LOCK ON GATE 10/05/04 10/06/04 31461 CORTE SONORA P.C.C. REPAIR 10/06;04 10/06/04 40210 DONOMORE COURT S.N.S. REPAIR 10/06/04 10/06/04 32108 CAMINO NUNEZ DEAD TREE 10/06/04 10/06/04 32162 CAMINO NUNEZ TREE REMOVAL 10/06/04 10/07/04 27523 SIENNA COURT TREE TRIMMING 10/07/04 10/07/04 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER DEBRIS REMOVAL 10/07/04 10/07/04 RORIPAUGH TREE TRIMMING 10/07/04 10/08/04 33370 ELIZABETH ROAD TREE TRIMMING 10/08/04 10/11/04 FENCE ON VIA LOBO FENCE REPAIR 10/11/04 10/11/04 45597 GLEN EAGLE COURT SLURRY QUESTIONS 10/11/04 10/11/04 27423 YNEZ ROAD DEBRIS PICK-UP 10/11/04 10/11/04 45343 ZUMA DRIVE TREE TRIMMING 10/11/04 10/11/04 VIA LOBO ROAD FENCE REPAIR 10/11/04 10/11/04 NICOLAS ROAD CATCH BASIN CLEANING 10/11/04 10/11/04 41543 AVENIDA DE LA REINA CATCH BASIN CLEANING 10/11/04 10/11/04 VIA LOBA ROAD FENCE REPAIR 10/11/04 10/12/04 27483 DANDELION ROAD TREE TRIMMING 00/12/04 R\MAINTAIN\WRKCOMRLTDIORS\ 05\0CTOSER DATE REC'D LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 10/12/04 41833 NIBLICK ROAD TREE TRIMMING 10/12/04 10/13/04 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT HWY 79 SO. DEBRIS REMOVAL 10/13/04 10/13/04 LONG CANYON DETENTION BASIN UNCOVER PIPES 10/15/04 10/14/04 33287 AVENIDA BICICLETA TREE TRIMMING 10/14/04 10/14/04 LOMA LINDA ROAD DEBRIS REMOVAL 10/14/04 10/14/04 39840 LONG LEAF STREET DEBRIS REMOVAL 10/14/04 10/14/04 39840 LONG LEAF STREET CONCRETE SPILL 10/14/04 10/14/04 32325 CALLE RESACA TREE TRIMMING 10/14/04 10/14/04 SANTIAGO ROAD AT FRONT STREET OVERHEAD SIGN FALLING 10/14/04 10/14/04 30620 BAYHILL DRIVE TREE DOWN 10/14/04 10/15/04 30510 MIRA LOMA DRIVE BACKFILL SIDEWALK 10/15/04 10/18/04 31965 CORTE SOLEDAD DISEASED TREES 10/18/04 10/18/04 42363 MASKUAZ COURT TREE TRIMMING 10/18/04 10/19/04 42781 LAS VIOLETTAS COURT OPEN TRENCH 10/19/04 10/19/04 28011 JEFFERSON DEBRIS REMOVAL 10/19/04 10/19/04 MURRIETA CREEK CLEAN OUT 10/19/04 10/19/04 32543 VALENTINO WAY POTHOLE 10/19/04 10/19/04 41250 VIA AGUILA TREE DOWN 10/19/04 10/19/04 44891 COUTE CARR TREE DOWN 10/19/04 10/19/04 32108 CAMINO NUNEZ DEAD TREE 10/19/04 10/20/04 COSMIC AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/20/04 NICHOLAS AT SO. GENERAL KEARNEY TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/20/04 VIA ALURA AT AMARITA TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/20/04 27851 DIAZ ROAD RESURFACING SCHEDULE 10/20/04 10/20/04 41986 ROANOAKE TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/20/04 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE CATCH BASIN PLUGGED 10/20/04 10/20/04 30195 YNEZ FLOODING 10/20/04 10/20/04 28426 PUJOL STREET STORM DRAIN PLUGGED 10/20/04 10/20/04 27851 DIAZ ROAD FLOODING 10/20/04 10/20/04 43343 CALLE NACIDO TREE DOWN 10/20/04 DATE REC'D LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 10/20/04 NICOLAS AT VIA LOBO TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/20/04 30905 BRANFORD DRIVE TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/20/04 31461 CORTE SONORA DEBRIS PICK-UP 10/20/04 10/20/04 29110 VALLEJO CULVERT BACKING -UP 10/20/04 10/20/04 28841 E. VALLEJO FLOODING 10/20/04 10/20/04 27851 DIAZ ROAD FLOODING 1020/04 10/20/04 SANTIAGO ROAD FLOODING 10/20/04 10/20/04 RANCHO VISTA AT CRC TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/20/04 40495 CALLE MEDUSA FLOODING 10/20/04 10/20/04 30085 LA PRIMAVERA TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/20/04 31026 CAMINO DEL ESTE TREE DOWN 10/20/04 10/21/04 47771 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD TREE DOWN 10/21/04 10/20/04 31138 CAMINO DEL ESTE TREE DOWN 10/25/04 10/22/04 31257 CORTE ALHAMBRA DEBRIS PICK-UP 10/22/04 10/22/04 29110 VALLEJO BLOCKED CULVERT 10/22/04 10/22/04 WINCHESTER AT MARGARITA CLOSE BIKE TRAIL 10/22/04 10/22/04 YNEZ AT YNEZ COURT R-26 DOWN 10/22/04 10/25/04 30600 DEL REY ROAD POTHOLE 10/25/04 10/25/04 PECHANGA PARKWAY POTHOLE 10/25/04 10/25/04 32325 CORTE ZAMORA POTHOLE 10/25/04 10/25/04 29051 YNEZ CULVERT BLOCKED 10/25/04 10/25/04 40783 CALLE KATERINE WATER LEAK 10/25/04 10/25/04 41250 FOSSE WAY SANDBAGS 10/25/04 10/25/04 NO. GENERAL KEARNEY BIKE PATH CLOSED 10/25/04 10/25/04 31625 DE PORTOLA ROAD EROISION 10/25/04 10/26/04 29000 OLD TOWN FRONT DEBRIS PICK-UP 10/26/04 10/26/04 27711 DIAZ ROAD CHANNEL BLOCKED 10/26/04 10/27/04 RANCHO VISTA AT MIRA LOMA TREE DOWN 10/27/04 10/27/04 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER DEBRIS PICK-UP 10/27/04 10/27/0=WARNER DIRT ROAD MUDDY 10/27/04 ]0/27/0RILLO DEBRIS PICK-UP 10/27/04 DATE REC'D LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 10/28/04 CALLE CEDRAL AT PAUBA ROAD FLOODED 10/28/04 10/28/04 41080 VIA HALCON TREE DOWN 10/18/04 1028/04 39445 PALA VISTA ROAD ROAD GRADING 10/28/04 10/28/04 LA PAZ AT HWY. 79 SO. SAND REMOVAL 10/28/04 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 90 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2004 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 10/01/04 OVERLAND REPLACED R-7 10/01/04 MARGARITA AT HONORS REPLACED R-7 10/01/04 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN REPLACED R-7 & "K" MARKER 10/01/04 VIA NORTE AT CALLE FIESTA REPLACED W-45 10/08/04 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT DE PORTOLA REPLACED R-1 10/11/04 OVERLAND AT VAIL RANCH REPLACED R-26-81 10/12/04 41955 MARGARITA REPLACED R-7, K MARKER 10/13/04 MARGARITA AT POST OFFICE REPLACED 2 DELINEATORS 10/13/04 CORTE CARA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY REPLACED R-7 10/13/04 LEENA WAY AT CALABRO REPLACED R-1 10/14/04 DE PORTOLA AT CAMPANULA REPLACED R-7 10/14/04 LA PRIMAVERA AT PAUBA REPLACED R-7 10/18/04 WOLF STORE ROAD AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE REPLACED W-41 10/19/04 VIA GILBERTO AT END REPLACED 3 "N" MARKERS 10/19/04 AMARITA AT VIA ALORA REPLACED R-2-40 10/22/04 YNEZ AT YNEZ COURT REPLACED R-26 10/22/04 MARGARITA AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REPLACED R-7, "K" MARKER 10/25/04 BUTTERFIELD STAGE AT RANCHO CALIF. ROAD REPLACED 2 DELINEATORS 10/25/04 JEREZ LANE AT MODENA PLACE INSTALLED R-1 10/25/04 JON CHRISTIAN AT RORIPAUGH INSTALLED R-1 10/28/04 LA SERENA REPLACED R-26-81 10/29/04 MARGARITA AT HWY. 79 SO. REPLACED R-18 TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 27 TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 2 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 0 R\MAINTAIMWKCMPLTD\SIGNS\O 05\OC OBER CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2004 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 10/01/04 AREA #3 MEADOWVIEW REPAINTED 23 LEGENDS 10/11/04 AREA #3 REPAINTED 35 LEGENDS 10/12/04 AREA #4 REPAINTED 30 LEGENDS 10/13/04 AREA #4 REPAINTED 39 LEGENDS 10/14/04 AREA #4 REPAINTED 12 LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 139 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 0 R WAINTAIMWRKCOMPLTD�TRIPING\M.05\OC OBER CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2004 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 10/07/04 SIENNA COURT AT RORIPAUGH TRIMMED 4 R.O.W. TREES 10/1 1/04 VIA SABINO AT ELIZABETH TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 10/13/04 COSMIC AT NORTH STAR TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 10/13/04 VIA CORDOBA AT VIA QUIVERA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 10/14/04 BRASSIE AT NIBLICK TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 10 RMIAIRTAIMWRKCOMPLTD\TREES\-05\0CTOBER CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2004 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 10/12/04 BACCARAT STREET ABATED 100 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS ABATED 100 R:WAINTAIMWKCOMPLTMWEEDSXM 05\=0BER APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City,ou ] FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, irector of Planning DATE: November 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 67 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home occupations and 7 applications for public hearings during the month of September. The new public hearing cases are as follows: DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS MAJOR MODIFICATION Status of Major Projects New Projects PM 28049 EOT — A fourth Extension of Time for Parcel Map 28049 (A proposed multi -family residential development. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Pujol Street and Calle Cerrillo. The application was submitted on September 30, 2004. The item has been tentatively scheduled for the December 2, 2004 Director's Hearing. (PA04-0539 HARRIS) • Temecula Town Center Modifications — A Major Modification to construct various fagade renovations and parking lot modifications within the Temecula Town Center. Located on the northeast corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. The application was submitted on September 23, 2004. Staff is awaiting plan revisions from the project architect. (PA04-0530 — HARRIS) RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004X10-2004 Report.doc • Alvarez Del Rio Building — A Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a 17, 378 square foot office/warehouse building on 1.43 acres. The subject property is located on the east side of Del Rio Road, south of Calle Cortez. (PA04-0543 — HARRIS) Rancho Baptist Church Monopine — A Conditional Use Permit application to construct an 80' foot monopine with shelter on the northwest corner of the Rancho Baptist Church property, located at 29775 Santiago Road, APN 922-130-017. (PA04-0578 — PETERS) Recently Approved Projects • Bev -Ray Camera: Staff worked with this established Old Town business ownerto help bring his signs into compliance with the sign program for the Temecula Stage Stop. This project was approved at the October meeting of the Old Town Local Review Board. • Fourth Street Antiques: New signs for this Old Town business were approved by the Old Town Local Review Board in October. • Harveston Neighborhood 6-A- Development Plan to construct 69 attached residential condominium units on 4.7 acres, located within Neighborhood G of the Harveston Specific Plan. The application was submitted on April 21, 2004. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on November 3, 2004. (PA04-0077 — HARRIS) • Harveston Neighborhood 12 - A Development Plan to construct 93 attached residential condominium units located within Neighborhood 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. The application was submitted on April 26, 2004. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on November 3, 2204. (PA04-0079 — HARRIS) • Creekside Plaza Pads 4 & 5 — An Administrative Development Plan to construct, establish and operate two commercial buildings of 5,600 and 9,600 square feet respectively. The subject site is located at the southwest corner of State Hwy 79 S. and Pechanga Parkway. The application was submitted on March 12, 2004. The DRC meeting was held on June 3, 2004. Second iteration letter sent on August 9, 2004. Applicant resubmitted on August 19, 2004. Project was administratively approved on October 10, 2004. (PA04 - 0170 — DAMKO) Beacon Industrial- A Development Plan requesting a 15,308 square foot multi -tenant light - industrial building. The property is located at 42103 Rio Nedo, just west of Diaz Road. A Pre- DRC meeting was scheduled on May 20, 2004. The DRC letter was sent on May 25, 2004. Applicant resubmitted on August 13, 2004. Approved by the Planning Commission on October 20, 2004. (PA04-0149 - DAMKO) • Tortelli second dwelling unit —Application for a 753 square foot second dwelling unit located at 29243 Providence Road in Harveston. Application was submitted on June 1, 2004. The DRC letter was sent on August 2, 2004. Applicant resubmitted on September 7, 2004. Project was administratively approved on October 11, 2004. (PA04-0378 - DAMKO) • Gallery Traditions — A product review for 8 single family residences including 3 floor plans and 2 architectural styles. The applicant submitted plans on June 2, 2004. DRC was held on August 5, 2004. DRC letter was sent on August 9, 2004. Applicant resubmitted on September 2, 2004. Project approved at the November 4, 2004 Director's Hearing. (PA04-0383 DAMKO) RMAONTHLY.RPT2004\10-2004 Report.doc • Southern California Car Company — A Minor Conditional Use Permit for an automobile sales facility with interior sales only (no outdoor display) from an existing building located at 28860 Old Town Front Street. This application was submitted on August 24, 2004. The project was approved at the October 21, 2004 Director's Hearing. (PA04-0508 — FISK) • La-Z-Boy— A Development Plan to construct a 15,000 square foot building for La-Z-Boy on .94 acres at the NE corner of North General Kearney and Promenade Loop Road. (APN 910-130- 088). A DRC meeting was held August 5, 2004. The Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions at its October 20, 2004 meeting. (PA04-0456 — PETERS) • Milgard Windows Addition — An Administrative Development Plan to construct an 8,775 square foot office addition to Milgard Windows located at 26879 Diaz Rd. An ad hoc Planning Commission sub -committee met with the applicant on September 15, 2004 to resolve design issues. A letter was sent to the applicant on September 20, 2004. Staff is reviewing revised plans. (PA04-0479 PETERS) • Temecula Creek Village —A zone change application to amend the text only of PDO-4 to change the schedule of Permitted Uses to allow alcohol sales in conjunction with restaurants and gift shops, located on the south side of Hwy 79 S. between Jedediah Smith Road and Avenida De Missiones. The item was approved at the City Council meeting on November 9, 2004. (PA04- 384 — PAPP) • Gallatin Parcel Map —A request to subdivide 2.89 acres into three lots with a minimum lot size of .92 acres located on the northeast corner of Margarita Road and DePortola Road. Gallatin Dental Group submitted the project on February 3, 2004. The project went to DRC on March 11, 2004. The project was resubmitted on August 3, 2004. This project was approved by the Planning Director on October 14, 2004. (PA04-0074 — LONG) • Horton Continental — A Product Review for 100 single family residences including four floor plans and four architectural styles. The project is in planning area 1 of Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The applicant submitted plans on Marchi , 2004 and submitted revised plans on May 25, 2004. Staff sent out comments on July 9, 2004. The applicant resubmitted plans on September 13, 2004. Staff is currently working on a staff report. The Planning Commission approved this project November 3, 2004. (PA04-0133 — LONG) Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints — An appeal of an approved Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan was filed by the "Homeowners of Temecula" on June 2, 2004.The approval will permit the applicant to construct and operate a 24,119 square foot single story church located on the north side of Pauba Road, approximately 170 linear feet west of the centerline of Corte Villoso. The project was approved by the Planning Commission at the May 191h Planning Commission hearing. The appeal was denied by the City Council on October 26, 2004, and the project is approved. (PA03-027 — HARRIS) Projects Under Review Commercial • Butterfield Square —A Development Plan to redevelop Butterfield Square in Old Town, resulting in four two-story buildings totaling 22,048 square feet on 0.56 acres located on the southeast l corner of Old Town Front Street and Third Street. The Applicant submitted plans on March 31, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on June 10, 2004. A DRC letter was sent to the applicant on R:\MONTHLV.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc July 13, 2004. Revised plans were submitted on September 29, 2004. The project was presented to the Old Town Local Review Board on November 8, 2004 and is anticipated to be heard in the January 2005 by Planning Commission. (PA04-0231 — FISK) Creekside Plaza Circle K/Unocal — An Administrative Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a service station, self service car wash and retail store within the Creekside Plaza Shopping Center. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of State Hwy 79 S. and Pechanga Parkway. The application was submitted on March 31, 2004. The DRC meeting was held on June 3, 2004. The applicant requested another meeting to further discuss plan revisions. The meeting was held on June 16, 2004. The DRC letter was sent on June 17, 2004. Applicant resubmitted on August 6, 2004. Sent 3rd iteration of comments out on September 1, 2004. Applicant resubmitted on October 7, 2004. Staff sent 4'" iteration of comments out on November 9, 2004 waiting for applicant response. (PA04 - 0232 — DAMKO) Roripaugh Town Center — A Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit and a Development Plan to design and construct approximately 171,200 square feet of commercial development, which include four major tenant buildings, six smaller freestanding buildings and inline shops on 20.2 acres. The project is located on the northeast corner of Nicholas Road and Winchester Road. Matthew Fagan Consulting Services submitted the application on July 24, 2003. A DRC meeting was held September 4, 2003. The project was resubmitted on November 12, 2003. Staff has reviewed the revised plans and at this time, the applicant has not complied with most of staff's initial comments, including: site layout, elevations, and pedestrian circulation. A Planning Commission subcommittee and Staff met with the applicant on March 29, 2004 to discuss the project. Staff sent a letter to the applicant on April 6, 2004, summarizing the issue's raised at the March 29, 2004 meeting. The applicant resubmitted plans on June 16, 2004. A DRC was held on July 22, 2004. On October 20, 2004 the Planning Commission made a recommendation that the City Council approve the project. Staff is currently scheduling this item for a City Council hearing. (PA02-0364 —LONG) St. Thomas Episcopal Church — A Development Plan /Conditional Use Permit for a 16,983 square foot sanctuary and a 12,768 square foot parish hall with day care on 3.74 acres, located at 29132 Avendia de Missiones. This application was submitted on June 4, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on August 12, 2004. The applicant has been discussing revised Concept plans with staff since August 12, 2004. Staff is currently awaiting submittal of revised plans. (PA04-0394 — FISK) Penny Dome Office Building — a Development Plan to construct a 5,296 square foot office building on 0.18 acres located at 41888 4'" street. This application was submitted on August 11, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on September 9, 2004 and a DRC letter was sent to the applicant on September 13, 2004. The project went before the Old Town Local Review Board on September 13, 2004. Revised plans were submitted on October 7, 2004. A second DRC letter was sent to the applicant on November 3, 2004 and staff is currently awaiting plan revisions. (PA04-0498 — FISK) • Moreno Road Office Building -A Development Plan to construct a two —story 7,000 square foot office building on .76 acres, located at 41919 Moreno Road. The application was submitted on July 12, 2004. Staff provided a DRC comment letter to the applicant on August 23, 2004 and continues to await plan revisions. (PA04-0470 HARRIS) RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc • Pauba Road Offices — A Development Plan to construct 2 two story office buildings totaling 18,237 square feet located at Pauba Road and Margarita Road. The office buildings will be used for retail and office space. A DRC meeting was held on October 7, 2004. A DRC letter was sent October 12, 2004. Staff is currently waiting for applicant response. (PA04-0476 — DAMKO) • Temecula Corporate Center —A Pre -application for a mixed -use business park was submitted on October 5, 2004, consisting of 17 office, "Flextech", and industrial buildings on two parcels (6.19 and 6.23 acres) on the east and west sides of Via Industria. The application was submitted October 5, 2004 and a DRC was held November 4, 2004. Staff is waiting for the formal submittal of a Development Plan application. (PR04-0017 — PETERS) • Vantage Oncology — A Minor Modification to an existing Development Plan was submitted on September 27, 2004 to add a 1,250 square foot addition to the Redhawk Medical Center at the southeast corner of George Cushman Court and Highway 79 South. The application was submitted September 27, 2004, and a DRC meeting was held October 28, 2004. Staff is currently waiting for response.(PA04-0535 — PETERS) • Calle Cortez — A Development Plan application was submitted on October 1, 2004 to construct two concrete tilt -up service commercial buildings. Building 1 is 16,954 square feet and building 2 is 15,432 square feet. The project is located on the north side of Calle Cortez, just west of Jefferson. Staff is reviewing plans. (PA04-0544 — DAMKO) • El Torito —A Development Plan to construct and operate a 7,380 square foot restaurant on 0.42 acres located at 40517 Margarita Road (Power Center II). The application was submitted on October 25, 2004 and staff is currently reviewing the plans. (PA04-0561 FISK) • Margarita Crossing — A Development Plan to construct a 37,173 square foot mixed use retail restaurant center on 5.56 acres located at the northwest corner of Margarita Road and Nicole Lane. The application was submitted on October 28, 2004 and staff is currently reviewing the plans (PA04-0563 — FISK) • Ruby's Restaurant — A Major Modification to include exterior material and color changes to convert an existing Coco's Restaurant to a Ruby's Diner at 26495 Ynez Road. The application is scheduled for the December 1, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. (PA04-0550 — PETERS) • Orchard Christian Fellowship —A Minor Modification to a 7,832 square foot assembly building to change windows and doors on two sides of the building, and add new steps and landscape planter. The application was submitted on October 18, 2004. A DRC meeting is scheduled for November 18, 2004. (APN 921-310-004) (PA04-0552 —PETERS) Subdivisions Seraphina Tract Map 32346 —A request to subdivide 28.6 acres into 67 lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet located on the north side of Nicolas Road. The project was submitted on March 16, 2004. The DRC letter was sent on April 20, 2004. The applicant submitted a draft development plan via email for staff's review on June 2, 2004. Staff reviewed draft development plan and sent comments via email on June 15, 2004. Staff met with applicant regarding additional issues in August. The applicant resubmitted on September 20, 2004. Staff sent third iteration letter on October 14, 2004. Waiting for applicant response. (PA04-0178- DAMKO) RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc • Wolf Creek PA 16—A Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 4.22 acres into 6 custom hillside lots averaging 30,000 square feet. The application was submitted on May 19, 2004 and a DRC meeting was held on July 1, 2004. A DRC letter was mailed to the applicant on July 6, 2004. The project was resubmitted on November 2, 2004 and staff is currently reviewing the revised plans. (PA04-0358/17M 32319 — KITZEROW) Industrial Roick/Regency Industrial Building —A Development Plan to construct an industrial building with four suites totaling 12,407 square feet on 1.87 acres on the southwest corner of Roick Drive and Winchester Road. James E. Horeca submitted the application for Regency, Inc, on July 1, 2003. A pre-DRC meeting was held on July 22, 2003. A DRC meeting was held on July 31, 2003 with the applicant. Staff was informed by the applicant on December 29, 2003 that there has been a change in architects. Applicant resubmitted on March 11, 2004, but the submittal package did not include revised landscape plans. Applicant was advised but has not yet submitted landscape plans. Letter was mailed to applicant on June 4, 2004 to extend application processing 6 months. New architect is working on revising plans. (PA03-0359 — KITZEROW) Temecula Industrial Park — A Development Plan to construct thirteen single -story office buildings totaling 56,900 square feet on 4.83 acres located on the west side of Business Park Drive, between Rancho Way and Rancho California Road, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho California Road. Scott Barone (Lot 11 BPD LLC) submitted the application on December 23, 2003. A DRC Meeting with the applicant was held on January 29, 2004. A DRC letter was sent to the applicant on February 2, 2004. The applicant submitted revised site plans on March 29, 2004, and again on April 28, 2004. A DRC was held July 15, 2004. Staff is reviewing revised plans submitted on September 9, 2004. A DRC meeting was held September 30, 2004 (PA03- 0728 -PETERS) Kearny Commerce Center — A Development Plan to construct an 86,175 square foot light industrial building on 5.55 acres located on the north side of Remington Avenue. Project was submitted on May 25, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on June 22, 2004. The DRC letter was sent June 23, 2004. The applicant resubmitted in July without fully addressing staffs comments. The second iteration letter was sent out on August 6, 2004. A tentative Planning Commission hearing date is scheduled for December 15, 2004. (PA04-0361 — DAMKO) Temecula Corporate Heights — Applicant is requesting a sign program for a multi -tenant industrial building at 42301 Zevo Drive, just west of Diaz Road. The DRC letter was sent on May 6, 2004. Applicant submitted on May 22, 2004. Sent 2"d iteration letter on June 8, 2004. The applicant resubmitted on June 29, 2004. Staff sent 3"d iteration comment letter on August 4, 2004. Applicant submitted on September 7, 2004. Staff sent 4th Iteration comment letter on September 17, 2004. Currently waiting for applicant response. (PA04-0198 - DAMKO) CBC Business Center — A Development Plan to construct two multi -tenant industrial buildings (Building A — 75,697 SF / Building B-56,193 SF) on 8.59 acres located on the north side of Remington Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet east of Winchester Road. The applicant submitted plans on March 1, 2004. A DRC meeting took place on May 20, 2004. A letter was mailed to the applicant on May 20, 2004. The application was resubmitted on June 28, 2004 and a letter requesting revisions was mailed to applicant on July 27, 2004. The application was resubmitted on August 23, 2004. Comments from other departments were due September 7, RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc 2004. Clearance from the county geologist is required prior to scheduling for hearing. This is anticipated to be received in November. (PA04-0134 - KITZEROW) Park Place Office: - A Development Plan to construct a 20,416 SF office building located at the southwest corner of Diaz Road. & Winchester Road. The applicant submitted plans on July 14, 2004. A Pre-DRC meeting was held on August 10, 2004.A DRC letter was mailed to the applicant on August 12, 2004. Revised plans were submitted on September 21, 2004. This item is tentatively scheduled for the December 1, 2004 Planning Commission. (PA04-0134 KITZEROW) • Weste Pointe Business Center —A Development Plan to construct 14 separate office buildings totaling 50,000 square feet set in a campus setting. The proposed buildings are located on the corner of Roick Road and Via Industria. A DRC meeting was held on September 29, 2004. Applicant resubmitted on November 4, 2004. A Planning Commission hearing date is tentatively scheduled for December 15, 2004. (PA04-0512 DAMKO) Mixed Use Old Town Queen Anne Victorian — A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 11,000 square feet mixed use building to include retail uses (restaurant) on the ground floor and office uses on the second floor on 1.93 acres, located at the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street. A DRC meeting was held on September 11, 2003. Revised plans were submitted on March 1, 2004. The project was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Old Town Local Review Board on April 12, 2004. Revised plans that were to address Public Works comments were submitted on July 28, 2004, and on September 9, 2004. The project is scheduled for the November 17, 2004 Planning Commission hearing. (PA03- 0447 — FISK) Residential Naron Pacific Tentative Tract Map 30434 — A proposal for a zone change from L-1 to L-2 on 31.93 acres and Tentative Tract Map to create 30 residential lots and 4 open space lots in the Chaparral area. The applicant has provided all materials, but is now proposing a PDO for the project. The CAC has made a recommendation on policy for the Chaparral Area allowing 1/2- acre lots if it does not increase the "net' density. A PDO was submitted on March 25, 2004. Staff met with applicant in April to discuss grading issues and begin preparation of an Initial Study. As of November 12, 2004 the applicant has not yet submitted a revised constraint map. (PA02-0204 — PAPP) Tierra Vista Condominiums — An Administrative Development Plan to construct 23 residential condominiums on 1.5 acres. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Tierra Vista Road and Ynez Road. The application was submitted on September 30, 2003. A DRC meeting was held on November 6, 2003. Revised plans were submitted on July 7, 2004. A second DRC letter was provided on September 10, 2004. Staff is awaiting plan revisions. (PA03-0552 — HARRIS) Del Val Second Dwelling Unit — An application for a second dwelling was received January 23, 2004 for a 768 square foot mobile unit at 31050 Nicolas Road at Leifer Road. A pre-DRC Meeting was held on March 9, 2004. A DRC meeting was held August 5, 2004. Waiting for applicant response. (PA04-0039 — PETERS) RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doo • Estero Street — A request for a Zone Change (from L-1 to L-2) and a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide a 1.39 acre parcel into two parcels for single family homes. The project is located at the end of Estero Street. The applications were filed on April 19, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on July 8, 2004. Staff is awaiting submittal of revised plans. (PA04 -0283 and PA04-0275 -PETERS) Temecula Ridge Apartments — A Development Plan for the addition of 20 units by adding a 3rd story to five buildings in a previously approved 220 unit apartment project. The site is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, southeast of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road. The application was submitted on April 13, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on June 10, 2004, and a letter was mailed to the applicant on June 14, 2004. Plans were resubmitted on October 12, 2004. This project is scheduled for the November 17, Planning Commission meeting. (PA04-0260 — KITZEROW) Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment - A Specific Plan Amendment (SPA), Tentative Tract Map and Zone Change PA04-0369, 0370, 0371. A request to change OS to LM and a tentative tract map to add 6 residential lots. SPA addresses fuel modification issues, general clean-up items such as fencing and inconsistencies. Staff sent a letter outlining concerns on June 28, 2004. The SPA was resubmitted on September 1, 2004. Staff sent out a correction letter on October 11, 2004. The project was resubmitted on October 29, 2004. Staff ils currently reviewing the document. (PA04-0369, 0370, 0371 LONG) • Saratoga Ridge —A Product Review for 10 detached single family residences which offer 2 floor plans, and 3 architectural styles. The project is located off Rancho Vista Road and Greentree. It was submitted on July 28, 2004. Sent comment letter to applicant on August 30, 2004. The applicant resubmitted on October 7, 2004. A Director's Hearing is scheduled for December 1, 2004. (PA04-0488 DAMKO) Temecula Lane — A Conditional Use Permit, Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map to construct 59 4-plex buildings totaling 236 units, 32 3-plex buildings totaling 96 units and 96 single-family detached units on a 47.5 acre site located at the northeast corner of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane. Staff is currently working with the applicant on completing the MSCHP — Hans review and assigning specific development standards for the project. (PA04- 0496 — HARRIS) Miscellaneous • Sprint 100 Margarita — A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the co -location of six (6) cellular telecommunication antennas on a mono -pine, which includes the replacement of the existing 57 foot high mono -pine with a 68'4 ft mono -pine. Located at 41520 Margarita Road. The application was submitted on September 23, 2004. A DRC letter was sent to the applicant on October 19, 2004 and staff is currently awaiting revised plans. (PA04-0529 — FISK) Faith Bible Church — A Minor Conditional Use Permit to establish a church facility at 42257 Avenida Alvarado. Project was submitted on April 13, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on May 20, 2004. Staff is currently waiting for revised plans. No change as of November 11, 2004. (PA04-0266 — LONG) Cingular Mono -Pine Wireless Antenna — A Conditional Use Permit to construct a 50' high monopine on Greentree Road, approximately 500' east of Via Sierra. Project was submitted on April 19, 2004. Staff sent a DRC letter on June 8, 2004. The applicant resubmitted plans on R:\MONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc September 23, 2004. Staff is in the process of contracting with a third party for review of the project. (PA04-0225 — FISK) AT&T and Verizon Wireless —A Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan to construct, operate and establish an unmanned wireless communication facility consisting of up to eight ±48' high "Italian Cypress" trees stealth antennas and an 8'x12' equipment area, located at the Rancho California Water District Water Reservoir Complex, east of Meadows Parkway. Staff has received phone calls from the surrounding residents expressing concerns about this proposal. The project was scheduled for the October 15, 2003 Planning Commission Hearing with a denial recommendation, however, the meeting was canceled and the project will be renoticed for a future Planning Commission Hearing. Staff met with the applicant on March 12, 2004, to discuss design alternatives. As of November12, 2004, the applicant has not resubmitted. (PA02-0335 — PAPP) Rancho Medical Group Sports Facility — A Conditional Use Permit for a recreation facility (for physical therapy and public use) in an existing 76,886 square foot building in the LI Zone located at 28780 Single Oak Drive. Proposal includes volleyball courts, basketball courts, martial arts studio and exercise equipment. The project was submitted on August 5, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on September 9, 2004. A DRC letter was sent on September 10, 2004. The project was resubmitted on September 14, 2004 and a second DRC letter was sent to the applicant on October 1, 2004. The project was resubmitted on October 27, 2004. Staff is reviewing the revised plans. (PA04-0493 KITZEROW) • Meadowview Golf Course — Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to design and construct a public golf course and driving range within the Meadowview Community. The Focused EIR requires modification. Staff provided an EIR comment letter to applicant the week of June 7, 2004. Staff is currently waiting for the revised EIR. (PA01-0375 — PETERS) Verizon Wireless Telecommunication — A Conditional Use Permit for a 60-foot high mono -pine within the Rancho California Water District Headquarters facility. Staff has informed the applicant that the proposed mono -pole is not an acceptable design for the area. The applicant indicated alternative sites would not be feasible; however, on November 10, 2003, they offered to look at alternative sites and designs. The applicant resubmitted on May 10, 2004. Staff met with the applicant on August 19, 2004 to discuss design alternatives. The applicant is continuing to cooperate with staff to develop an agreeable design solution. On September 16, 2004 the applicant submitted design concepts that were not supported by staff. There has been no formal resubmittal since May 10, 2004. (PA02-0637 — PAPP) Cyberzone — A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the establishment and operation of an Internet business to rent computer times for Internet and Microsoft applications within an existing suite of the Promenade Mall. Staff has received conditions of approval from other departments and scheduled the project for the April 7, 2004 Planning Commission Hearing The applicant lost their lease prior to the hearing, so the application has been continued off calendar in anticipation of another lease space becoming available within the mall. (PRJ00-906 — FISK) Temecula Regional Hospital: A General Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a fitness center, cancer center, two medical/office buildings (4 stories each) and a six story hospital structure all totaling approximately 535,000 square feet, located north of Highway 79 S, south of De Portola and west of Margarita Road. Project was submitted June 30, 2004. A DRC was held on August 18, 2004. Staff and the City Council subcommittee have met with the applicant twice. The applicant submitted revised plans and a R:\MONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc Tentative Parcel Map (PA04-0571) on November 4, 2004. Staff is currently reviewing the plans (PA04-0462, 0463 LONG) Verizon Wireless Telecommunication — A one year extension of time for a previously approved Minor conditional Use Permit (PA01-0019) to co -locate 3 antenna array panels on an existing monopine structure located at the RCWD tank in Chardonnay Hills, 31008 Rancho California Road. A Director Hearing was held on September 9, 2004 where it was re -directed to Planning Commission due to environmental concerns expressed by neighboring property owners. An Initial Study is being prepared to consider aesthetic impacts. The applicant has been notified that a Negative Declaration will be prepared. This item has not yet been scheduled for Planning Commission. (PA04-0264 PAPP) • Concordia University — A CUP to allow an education facility within an existing building in the LI Zone, located at 28780 Single Oak Drive. This application was received on October 29, 2004. Staff is currently reviewing plans and a Pre-DRC is scheduled for November 23, 2004. (PA04- 0565 KITZEROW) — • Nextel at Bennett —A Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a cellular telecommunications facility consisting of six antennas (total) on two light poles and 11.5" x 20" equipment building on 12 acres located at 32240 Highway 79 South. The application was submitted on November 1, 2004 and staff is currently reviewing the plans. (PA04-0566 — FISK) • Dalton Historic Building — A sign program for an approved 17, 334 square foot three-story office/retail building located at the northwest corner of Mercedes Street and Fifth Street. The application was submitted on November 4, 2004 and staff is currently reviewing the proposed sign program. (PA03-0711 — FISK) Small Business Assistance • La Tacqueria: Staff is working with the owners of this Old Town business on a revised plan for an exterior fagade improvement that includes new awnings, paint and signs. A proposal from the contractor is to be submitted to the Planning Department in December. • Rachel' Place — Planning staff is working with this new business in order to help them obtain funding for new signs under the Fagade Improvement Program. • Art Dispora — This new business located in Old Town has submitted designs for new signs that were approved by the Planning Department in October and were funded under the Fagade Improvement Program. • The Trick Shop: Planning staff is working with this applicant on signs for this new business in Old Town. The final elevations will be submitted to the Old Town Local Review board in November. • Fourth Street Antiques — New signs for this Old Town business were approved by the Old Town Local Review Board in October. This project will be funded under the Fagade Improvement Program. RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc 10 Special Event Permits • Temecula Tractor Race —This event took place on October 1, 2, and 3 at the Riverside County Flood Control property located at the southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Cherry Street. The City of Murrieta was notified of this activity since it is adjacent to their border. • American Cancer society Relay — Staff is helped this organization with their application for a fundraising event that took place on October 23, and 24, 2004 at Chaparral High School. • Halloween in Old Town — Staff assisted the Redevelopment Department with their temporary use permit application for this event that took place in Old Town on October 30, and 31, 2004. Special Projects & Long Range Planning Activities The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities are as follows: • Comprehensive General Plan Update —The third community workshop was held on November 4, 2004. The Screencheck Draft of the EIR is still expected to available for staff's review in mid November. (HOGAN) • Public Transit Master Plan — Staff is researching how these issues have been addressed by other jurisdictions as the first step in developing a work plan and scope of work. (WEST) • Santa Margarita River Watershed Planning Project - Staff members from the Planning and Public Works Departments are participating in the process to ensure that the results and recommendations are based upon good information, appropriate science, and that the interests of local residents are protected. Comments on the revised draft of the watershed assessment report will be provided in early November. (HOGAN) • Automobile Dealership Signage and Special Events — Staff met with the representatives of the Temecula Automotive Dealerships Association on November 1, 2004 to discuss these issues. The auto dealers have a subcommittee working on their recommended changes. • Staff has prepared a final draft ordinance to codify use restrictions and supplemental standards for "Cyber Cafes." The final draft was routed to the City Attorney on September 15, 2004. This item has not yet been scheduled for public hearing. (PAPP) • Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan Amendment — Staff is proposing to amend the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan to resolve commercial zoning issues and existing land uses adjacent to Area 8. (PA97-0443 WEST) • Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan, Amendment 8.1 and Supplemental EIR — Staff is waiting for the applicant to submit a revised project schedule and the draft of the Specific Plan and Supplemental EIR. (PA03-0402,0403 —WEST) • Telecommunications Facilities — Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for consultants to evaluate the technical reports submitted for new telecommunication facilities. The closing date for the proposals was November 3, 2004. Staff received seven proposals RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc 11 which are currently being reviewed. Staff anticipates selecting a firm by end of November 2004. (WEST) • Architectural Review — Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Architectural Review Services. The closing date was October 18, 2004. Staff received three proposals to provide this service. Staff anticipates selecting a firm by mid November 2004. (WEST) • Supplemental Development Standards (Alcohol Sales) — Staff and the City Attorney are developing additional performance standards. The tentative schedule has a proposed ordinance amendment going to the Planning Commission in December 2004. (HOGAN) • Hillside Development Policy — The policies are being examined for integration into the draft - grading ordinance. Staff is working with GIS to analyze topography, soil types, environmental (habitat), and other constraints. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. • Procedures to Implement CEQA — Staff initiated project to develop local guidelines and procedure manual for processing CEQA documents, including the adoption of local exemptions. The process will also conform to the new CEQA Guidelines, and will create new templates for standard CEQA forms. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. • Surface Mining Ordinance — The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. • Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance — Final changes are being made prior to scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. • South Side Street Improvement Project —The former South Side Specific Plan is being modified to design guidelines and a street improvement program for Old Town Front Street between First Street and Highway 79 South. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. • Update of the Citywide Design Guidelines - Staff has completed its review of the Guidelines and has provided a comprehensive set of comments to the consultant assisting in this effort. The consultant will require two to three weeks to respond to staff comments and prepare a Final Draft. A presentation to Planning Commission is tentatively scheduled for mid -December 2004. (PAPP) • Margarita Village Specific Plan Amendment. —A minor amendment was resubmitted to facilitate HOA ownership of the pool, tennis courts and tot lot. This item is scheduled for the Planning Commission on December 1, 2004. (PA04-0486 WEST) • City — Project environmental reviews and permitting: o Overland Drive Extension — Staff reviewed 2nd submittal of the draft initial study / Mitigated Negative Declaration and has provided comments to Public Works. No resubmittal to date. o Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping Project — Request from Public Works for Environmental Determination for this project. Previous Negative Declaration has been modified because the project description has changed. The revised N.D. has been routed to Redevelopment, TCSD, and Public Works for comments. Planning has not received RAMONTHLV.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc 12 comments. Planning will coordinate with Public Works to schedule this item for City Council. (EA-93 — PAPP) Diaz Road General Plan Level Improvements — Staff has prepared an initial study to determine the impacts of constructing ultimate improvements on Diaz Road. The initial study will need to be revised because of recent improvements at the intersection of Diaz Road and Rancho Way. Staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be prepared. Planning will coordinate with Public Works to schedule this item for City Council. (EA107 — PAPP) 0 1-15 / SR79 S. Ultimate Interchange Project — Staff has provided direction to the Public Works on the issues that need to be addressed in the NEPA/CEQA document that will be prepared. (EA111 WEST) o Mercedes Street Interim Parking Lots - Staff has review the proposed project and determined that a Categorical Exemption will meet the requirements of CEQA. (EA-115 HOGAN) General Plan Amendments PA03-0178 TERC 52, LLC —A General Plan Amendment application (and Zone Change PA03- 0177) to change the land use designation on 52.83 acres from Business Park to High Density Residential at the northwest corner of the Rancho California Business Park, adjacent to the Campus project. Staff is awaiting the submittal of additional information and has advised the applicant that the proposal will not go to hearing until the Comprehensive General Plan Update is complete. (PAPP) • Margarita Village General Plan Amendment (PA040391) and Specific Plan Amendment (PA04- 0390) to change the land use designation from VL (very low - .2 to .4 du/acre) residential to LM (low medium — 3 to 6 du/ac) for 18.3 acres along the west side of Butterfield Stage road, north of Chemin Clinet. This is associated with a Tentative Tract Map (PA04-0392) for 36 residential lots ranging in size from 7,200 to 25,000 SF. These applications were submitted on June 2, 2004. A DRC meeting is was held on July 8, 2004. The project was resubmitted on August 2, 2004 and a DRC letter was sent to the applicant on August 26, 2004. Staff is currently reviewing revised plans submitted on October 4, 2004. (KITZEROW) PA04-0411, Nicolas 73 — A General Plan Amendment application (and Zone Change PA04- 0414, and TTM PA04-040415) to change the land use designation on 73 acres from very low density Residential to L-1 at the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Via Lobo. Pre-DRC was held on July 8, 2004 and DRC was held on for July 15, 2004. Based upon issues raised at DRC and clarified in a follow-up letter the applicant was informed that staff does not support the GPA. Issues related to the overall project density and number of lots proposed on the map will require a resubmittal. The proposal will not go to Public Hearing prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive General Plan update. (PAPP) R:\MONTHLY.RPT\2004\10-2004 Report.doc 13 REQUESTS TO SPEAK REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. Date // - )-3 `0 `f' I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. For Against Subject: ` If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. Pam. I i Date l l )- 3-C) `/ I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. `ci--� Q�/'m,en For ainst Subject: C I � ( Address: ':� "City/State/Zip: _ If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. I P,"k1 l � Date I — ;,) �)-0 `t I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. �VY\ (Y\ eV\+ S For j / Against Subject: Ak If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. DateJ/WZdT For Subject: R-A Fes• I wish to speak on Agenda Item No Against <� .4 f All e'JI Name: 7"if -J�mj*A Cemr Phone: ? Address: State/Zip: /onL' eti If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: 3�n The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. After completing, Date For REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. I wish to speak on Agenda Against Item No. Co�}� If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. Date I I 11 L} e M I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. I For x Against Subject: r i 4/1" 1/ 4 /'0(,J-1 ce'�" Name: �� City/State/Zip: Z If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: U fC /le- The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 7 After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. Date 11-;3- 6� 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item No. I Subject: For Against i Name: City/State/Zip:- 00 If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: t�4LJ The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the 6 public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. Date 1-i3 -09 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item No. For Against Subject: Name: LPdZS Phone: ( Address: State/Zip: 56t� QUNI cad 2� GF If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. C'bi. CU REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. Date 'L5 2004 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item No. 1 For ✓ Against Subject: V Name: 1� Qti1Zo221 Phone: Address: ` City/State/Zip: 6,p IoL)34 If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA / After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. Date 0 / 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item No. For Against Subject: Name: Y WC� 1 )I PGW" Phone: ( � Address: City/State/Zip: CA If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: AUMW E F rc--- 00&0 7MH The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You. Date I �3 o ti For Subject: Name: I wish to speak on Agenda Item Against hone: ity/State/Zip:i �d/�Nb,C7t `fZ6� If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD 3M Scotchlite'" Dynamic Message Systems Active School Zone Signs • 4 11TW' . - n r How safe is the route to school? .1 Livery year, millions of children walk to school or to a bus stop. Students are at much greater risk traveling to and from school than at any other time in their school day. During the 1997-98 school year, about 800 children between the ages of 5 and 18 were killed while traveling by passenger car, foot, bicycle, public transportation and school bus during normal school transportation hours. Many more were injured or suffered close calls. School -age children are especially vulnerable to pedestrian crashes. They are often small in stature and difficult for drivers to see. Children can also lack good judgment when crossing streets. at can you do to alert drivers to the presence of children? To make sure children in your P 'Ci--- community are seen and not hurt, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has approved fluorescent yellow green color for use on school zone warning signs. Fluorescent yellow green is a highly visible color during the hours of dawn, daytime, dusk, and in inclement weather as well as at night. Actual performance tests of the new color show that drivers slow down 50 to 100 percent more often. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) also recommends using the 'variable display sign" to call greater attention to the speed limit in school zones. These signs display reduced speed only when children are present. They can also be programmed to show the actual speed of an approaching driver. In reviewing the relationship between vehicle travel speeds and resulting pedestrian injury, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that higher vehicle speeds are strongly associated with a greater likelihood of pedestrian crash occurrence and a more serious -resulting pedestrian Variable display signs command the attention and respect of drivers —especially at critical crossing locations where sight distance is obstructed, approach speed is relatively high, traffic volume is heavy or many children are on the scene. Now 3M` Scotchlite" Dynamic Message Systems Active School Zone Signs offer the best of both solutions in one application to improve sign visibility, alert drivers, and protect children at school crossings. Advanced technology for school zone signing 3M" Scotchlite"' Dynamic Message Systems Active School -Zone Signs offer advanced state- WM of -the -art _'!WM solutions that =� combine the high visibility of fluorescent IV yellow green and the impact of dynamic message systems. There are two programmable sign options. The variable speed limit sign gives motorists passing through a school zone the actual speed limit currently enforced in the zone. The driver feedback speed sign shows the passing motorist how fast they're actually going. Both signs are mounted and used in conjunction with static school crosswalk signs. EfficacN Driver Feedback Sign Efficacy Tests Maine DOT —56% reduction in vehicles speeding over 6+ mph —17% reduction in 85th percentile speed (34 to 28 mph) —23% reduction in mean speed (32 to 25 mph) Clarksville, TN —62% reduction in vehicles speeding over 6+ mph —15% reduction in 85th percentile speed (34 to 28 mph) —19% reduction in mean speed (27 to 22 mph Netherlands -67% reduction in excessive speeds Speed Data 3M Driver Feedback Sign Example of Speed Data Logging Feature .JQ OQ.J^^d to -lux n1WROM18%, dj_i-a-d b Fdl YW VOW Fgerl lank tlpta ltbdOW t* Select a Tab to Yew Repoli or Plot: 12/1f2l 12/1f2 Percent Speemr.l Veh"c Areraee spar aAe N Percenile Wet wtle Cunt I pate" VshWe Spero 12/1f2l Sunmrr 8epnrt Cuntdree speed tlon Cu.."we Speed I speeila Yatrcb. ' 12/1/2l 12M/21 IMlocatot l]rlaa ,M11s5 Isauennerd Periot 12n 12m4121e00 AM to QrM2004 e0000 AM 17/1/21 Sign Aeereac 1 ltlepor" Pwkxt: 121 0004121000 AM to 12rar2" R0000 AM 12n12 Pot0Pd Spwd LW& 35 WH 12M 12 12/10 121woomin 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 0 12/1/21 12tl2aaa2o 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a o 0 a 0 0 12p/21 l2jl20040•.30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12d 121100401.40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1211/20M0:50 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12W 1211r200t 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12rM 1211f20017:10 70 56 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 80 12rM 121lr20047:20 70 56 8 8 e 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 80 70 56 e 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a 8 80 12rM12$1120047:30 VJIAM 7:40 70 56 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a 6 80 12AM IZIIIM 750 70 56 8 e 8 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 80 12W 121trAN &.00 70 56 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 a0 12rM12f2J2M40: 10 70 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20 l2/2,f2004 0: 20 70 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20 12R/3 I2(2(2aN 0:30 70 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20 12a/A 1 0:40 70 14 2 2 2 2_ 2 2-2 _2 _. _2 _ _2__ 20 12rM 12rM TM111 Mw6w A Vebolea: 4300 kmalle Speed: 30Iwt 12M latex" wed Speat 25 - 27 WH INaratte 85M Percentile Splet .Al WI, 12W 1 MUNEW peed: 52-54 INK -_-Print 12W 12f3fd 12W Start Over h 12W R rrf12f3rb...�� L►in 1 aamy�rs MUE�Ft Carat IWOr Tate _ __ -_ L� ._ ._ .. - _ iP 6Jrn-13M r...� 7W - ftF.s-d-OFE.dr 0>oetawond Paroeeu...� •JLICAPnlva iFfinUMM... � grIwt�.�®0 Cal Tran sApproval STATE OF CALIFORNIA a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY DIRECTIVE TR-0011 (REV 711P2003) TRAFFIC OPERATIONS POLICY DIRECTIVE NUMBER PAGE 03-04 I OF 3 KARLA SUT I IVI N CHIEF (Signature) DATE ISSUED EFFECTIVE DATE 07/21 /03 08/01/03 SUBJECT DISTRIBUTION ❑ All District Directors VEHICLE SPEED FEEDBACK SIGNS All Deputy District Directors - Traffic Operations All Deputy District Directors - Maintenance ❑ All Deputy District Directors - Construction r ] All Deputy District Directors - Project Development r I All Deputy District Directors - Transportation Planning ❑ Chief, Division of Engineering Services ® Chief Counsel, Legal Division ❑ Publications (for Distribution to all holders of Traffic Manual) ❑ Headquarters Division Chiefs for: DOES THIS DIRECTIVE AFFECT OR SUPERSEDE ❑ YES NO IF YES, DESCRIBE ANOTHER DOCUMENT? NOT APPLICABLE WILL THIS DIRECTIVE BE INCORPORATED IN THE YES ❑ NO IF YES, DESCRIBE TRAFFIC MANUAL? Section 4-03.6 Individual Policies For Regulatory Signs DIRECTIVE The following Traffic Operations Policy Directive supplements the California Department of Transportation Traffic Manual, Section 4-03.6, Individual Polices For Regulatory Signs - R2 SPEED LIMIT SIGN. The Directive is applicable on public roadways in California. A Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with an R-2 Speed Limit Sign. 7 It checkW. See conlnwta pages) STATE OF CALIFORNIA . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY DIRECTIVE (Continued) r TR-0011 (REV 7/1/2003) DEFINITIONS When used in this Traffic Operations Policy Directive, the text shall be defined as follows: 1) Standard - a statement of required, mandatory, or specifically prohibited practice. All standards text appears in bold type. The verb shall is typically used. Standards are sometimes modified by Options. 2) Guidance - a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgement or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements text appears in underlined type. The verb should is typically used. Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options. 3) Option - a statement of practice that is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Options may contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance. All Option statements text appears in normal type. The verb may is typically used. 4) Support - an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. Support statements text appears in normal type. The verbs shall, should and may are not used in Support statements. ATTACHMENTS NONE CTCDC CTCEIC Minutes September 24, 2003 Page 17 of 21 Action: Item approved for experimentation. 03-15 Radar Speed Sign Note for reader's clarification: The Committee is dealing with two types of radar (changeable message) signs. In the previous meeting minutes, they were noted as "speed feedback" sign and "radar speed" sign. To clarify, the "speed feedback" sign is a single -mode sign that displays the speed of an approaching vehicle. The "radar speed" sign is a dual -mode sign, "steed limit/radar speed feedback" sign that displays speed limit and changes to vehicle speed when an approaching motorist is above the speed limit. The ".speed jeedbach" sign has been adopted as a standard traffic control device in California and the polity has been pasted on the jedlowing C'altrans website: hIto://%%w.dot.ca.eov/hn/ti affoos/sientech/siendeVoolicy.him TM dam as" sip,'ypeed ■sdlfr'adar speed hadhark" dip Is not as approved device Is CaBfortaix, therel6te, Me htahBOUon ofHt4 sip requires approval ftvm the CTCDC. Chairman Fisher asked Ed von Borstel to introduce Agenda Item 03-15 experimental request submitted by the City of Freemont. Ed reminded the Committee Members that during the last CTCDC meeting a similar type of request was approved for the City of San Jose, San Mateo and Vacaville. Ed introduced Rene Dalton and Sandeep Mangat, City of Freemont and asked them to present their request to the Committee. Rene stated that the City of Freemont is requesting approval for the "speed limit/radar speed feedback" sign at five residential street locations. Two of the locations are near elementary schools. The purpose is to remind motorists that they are in a 25-mph speed limit zone. The 85-percentile speed is from 33 to 35- mph. The average daily traffic volume varies from 1200 to 3100. The City will collect "before and after' data and will submit that data to the Committee. He asked for the Committee's approval for the experimentation and he is available for questions if there are any. Chairman Fisher opened discussion among Committee Members. Gerry Meis noted that the proposed sign displays posted speed limit for the roadway, however, when an approaching vehicle is over the speed limit, the message changes to the vehicles actual speed. Gerry added that presently six agencies have approval to conduct experiments with a similar type of sign at approximately 55-60 locations. So far, the Committee has not received any comprehensive data from the experimenting agencies, except, the City of Garden Grove has submitted a brief report, and the copies were mailed to Committee Members. Farhad Mansourian commented that the request is identical to the other approvals, which were given to the City of San Jose, San Mateo and Vacaville. Chairman Fisher commentated that during the last meeting an experiment was approved with two different signs, a dual -mode ("speed limit/radar speed feedback") and with a single -mode ("speed feedback"). The concern raised during the last meeting was not raised during the earlier approvals. He asked Rene whether they would consider the same process as was approved for the three cities during the last meeting. Merry Banks expressed that during the last meeting the Committee had asked the City of San Jose, San Mateo and Vacaville to use two different signs to see which one is more effective. Michael Montoya, Vendor, responded that the collection of post data will take between six -months and a year and at that time, the Committee would have enough information from all the agencies to determine the Sizes 2 size options: •24"x30" for 2 lane roads •36"x48" for multi -lane roads Application Itt -- Y o u R ys� SPEED Driver Feed Back Sign Caltrans and The MUTCD approval state: "A Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign that displays approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with an R-2 Speed Limit Sign" DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD aK 1 � � CLt1�25�0`F CALLE PINA COLADA TRAFFIC PROBLEM First and foremost I think this is not only a problem for Pina Colada residents but one affecting our entire community. In fact, a "Traffic Study" of Meadowview and surrounding communities was to be conducted some six (6) years ago. For this reason, any recommendation should be presented through our "Homeowner Association". Our primary problem is "Volume". There are simply not enough streets leading in or out of Meadowview in order to accommodate the normal traffic flow. The secondary reason for the excessive volume is due to the cut through traffic which should be using major roadways such as Margarita and La Serena Way. We are currently in a semi -gated community with the gate across Kahwea. Meadowview homeowners are limited in their ability to exit our community thereby creating the excessive volume of traffic on Pina Colada and several other streets. Thus, my first recommendation is that Meadowview traffic be allowed to exit our community via Kahwea. This would also reduce the traffic flow throughout our community by preventing motorists from driving around the circle of Del Rey to Pina Colada for their exit. I think that even the homeowners on Kahwea would appreciate a faster and safer exit. This would also provide safety for our children by allowing their parents to drive them to school by way of Kahwea exit without having to make that extremely dangerous left turn at Pina Colada and La Serena Way. I am not suggesting that Kahwea be a one way street. Kahwea residents will still be able to travel in both directions. Simply open half of the gate allowing motorist to "Exit Only" thereby eliminating a great deal of traffic not only on Pina Colada but on Del Rey, La Serena Way, etc.. Other recommended improvements are listed as follows: I - Reduce speed limit signs on Del Rey to 25mph. This is a residential street with ever increasing cut through traffic to the shopping center and other communities. Reducing the speed limit will make this cut through a little less attractive and much safer. LI 2- Add stop signs at hazardous intersection along Del Rey from Pina Colada to North Gen Kerney. This too should reduce cut through traffic making this residential short cut a little less desirable. 3- Post "No Trucks" signs at Pina Colada and La Serena Way. 4- Add reflectors of Pina Colada and Del Rey preventing motorist from running through the fence at that intersection. The above recommendations can be implemented with minimal cost and would be very helpful. Other solutions such as gated community, alternate roadway modifications, turn restrictions etc.. can be studied further. Sincerely, Ray Ouellette