Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot 54-57, 65-71 & 90-96 Precise Grading GRADING NOTES: 1. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST PROVISION OF THE 1998 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, PRECISE GRADING PLAN APPENDIX CHAPTER 33, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 99-23. 9&/ppb AD 2. MINIMUM BUILDING PAD AND DRAINAGE SWALE SLOPE SHALL BE 1%. DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL BE A RAN ORo MINIMUM OF 0.2' DEEP AND BE CONSTRUCTED A MINIMUM OF 2' FROM THE TOP OF CUT OR FILL SLOPES. OAD CROINNE HILL NOTTINGHAM0 3. MAXIMUM CUT AND FILL SLOPES = 2:1. AH it Soh PROJECT S ITE 4. PROVIDE 5' WIDE BY 1' HIGH BERM OR EQUIVALENT ALONG THE TOP OF ALL FILL SLOPES OVER 5' HIGH. ' AUS 5. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF COMPETENT SOILS ENGINEER WHO SHALL �. VIA RAMI m CERTIFY THAT ALL FILL HAS BEEN PROPERLY PLACED AND WHO SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL COMPACTION � CRE o CAgEa REPORT FOR ALL FILLS OVER 1' DEEP. ANS PHASE 3 TRACT NO , 23143 10 and 11 ;_qg S AGO M� � � AC fol6. A REGISTERED CML ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WRITTEN aROAD $ ArPL z CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING w �, + PLAN PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE TO LINE, GRADE, LOTS 54 57 65 71 AND 90 96 ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF CUT FILL SLOPES. o 7. PROVIDE BROW DITCH DESIGNED TO HANDLE 100 YR. Q FLOWS, ALONG TOP OF CUT SLOPES. °F PIO PICO RD. B. FINAL COMPACTION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL FILLS GREATER THAN ONE FOOT. ItOND 9. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY SOILS ._ 400w memo anew HWY. 79 INVESTIGATION BY CONVERSE CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO 96-81-420-01 DATED 4-26-96 AND ALL �" -- -~-- �-- --- --- -- ADDENDA THERETO. TWO SETS OF THE FINAL COMPACTION REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY �- l -- -� �,,, ���� TO SAN DIEGO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WHICH SHALL INCLUDE FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS AND coop -� __ VICINITY AP CERTIFICATIONS THAT GRADING HAS BEEN DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF -� NOT TO SCALE THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT. ~-, NONNI NEW - � CRQ r r ....... �. wlvt 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TEL. 909,694--6411 AT LEAST 24 ` HOURS IN ADVANCE REQUESTING FINISH LOT GRADE AND DRAINAGE INSPECTION. THIS INSPECTION MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION FOR EACH LOT. 11. CUT SLOPES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND FILL SLOPES EQUAL TO OR '� T! GREATER THAN 5' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS OR GROUND COVER AS SHOWN --- '.. ' 1 ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PROTECT THE SLOPE FROM EROSION AND INSTABILITY IN ' ,� � .,r :y � P.L. C ACCORDANCE WITH CITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 17.06 PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF FINAL INSPECTI ,G' �f`; ; r; �:..`YN, ,:` dt' `� 12. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED ON EXISTING GROUND UNTIL THE GROUND HAS BEEN CLEARED OF WEEDS, DEBRIS, TOPSOIL, AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 96 ` 1 X MIN. a 90 �,, . 13. IF STEEP SLOPING TERRAIN OCCURS UPON WHICH FILL IS TO BE PLACED, IT MUST BE CLEARED, KEYED, 70 \ AND BENCHED INTO FIRM NATURAL SOIL FOR FULL SUPPORT. PREPARATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY A o REGISTERED SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL MATERIAL. rn - �. �k7f /r I39 89 - 71 �- - 2' 14. DURING ROUGH GRADING OPERATIONS AND PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT DRAINAGE I 65 3 (� 5' MIN STRUCTURES, TEMPORARY DRAINAGE CONTROL SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT PONDING WATER -� / PUBLIC MIN. �.. .-� � / UTILITY AND DAMAGETO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. I 5 E 9 5 / EASEMENT/ MIN. B 270 MIN. 15. DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. 91 V A5. _ -1 / / _ 0 ? 16. ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE COURSES ON THE PROJECT SITE MUST CONTINUE TO FUNCTION, ESPECIALLY I ? '--r DURING STORM CONDITIONS. PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS MUST Q3 BE USED TO PROTECT ADJOINING PROPERTIES DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. 8 / _ PUBLIC I � a f UTILITY 17. STABILITY CALCULATIONS WITH A FACTOR OF AT LEAST ONE AND FIVE TENTH (1.5) SHALL BE `� / 66V J EASEMENT I . I I SUBMITTED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR CUT AND FILL SLOPES -�. � � � � OVER 30' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT. 19 4 ► V a 5, 92 6 a a PUBLIC 18. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR SHALL SUBMIT CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING _ _ _ UTILITY EASEMENT CN PAD ELEVATION. WHERE SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS ARE REQUIRED, THE ELEVATION (WITH RESPECT TO MEAN --- '-' SEA LEVEL) SHALL BE GIVEN. IF AN ELEVATION WITH RESPECT TO ADJACENT GROUND SURFACE IS 87 I REQUIRED, THE ACTUAL DISTANCE ABOVE THE ADJACENT GROUND SHALL BE GIVEN. IdPw 51c% 19. EROSION CONTROL: ALL GRADED SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ROSEA ICE PLANT AT 12" ON CENTERS `� ""` ' ` �"'� 78 �" V � � '`� TYPICAL LOT � OR ANOTHER APPROVED GROUND COVER. SLOPES OVER 15' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT, IN ADDITION TO GROUND COVER, SHALL BE PLANTED WITH APPROVED TREES, SHRUBS, OR COMBINATION THEREOF. SHRUBS SHALL �,`G BE PLANTED AT 10 ON CENTERS. SLOPES OVER 4 93 67 DRAINAGE DETAIL IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL HAVE PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES PER U.P.C., CHAPTER 10.R V N.T.S. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN 20. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROM ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AT NOT LESS THAN 11,C PER FOOT FOR ",,^*` 5 Q SEE PLAN FOR DRIVEWAY GRADE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET. 86 � ��"' 56 ! `J' '4 / / 21. NO OBSTRUCTION OF FLOOD PLAINS OR NATURAL WATER COURSES SHALL BE PERMITTED. ® L 53 5 2 58 57 �.. r 22. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED iN THE FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION/GRADING. 59 -' 51 5' P.L. ;��� 5 0 MIN. , 23. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OR ITS AGENTS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE APPLICANT AND HIS 60 ENGINEER FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED ] /I �" z MIN z DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON REQUEST THE APPROPRIATE PLAN REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY Pil, J � � + FL 71 3 2 �� SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. MIN. 24. RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY BY THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT. ,, � e m m 3, 25. W.D.I.D N0. 933S317203 K " IG ' 2:1 MIN. �o � 26. SEE APPROVED WALL AND FENCING PLAN" FOR YARD AND PERIMETER WALLS AND FENCES - BACKWATER HAP• VALVE CHART ��1 27. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES NOT IMPLY OR PROVIDE ANY CLEARANCES - =~`- FROM STATE OR FEDERAL WILDLIFE AGENCIES REGULATING THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA OR NATIONAL LOT LOT LOT MIN. -� ENDANGERED SPECIES ACTS. THE CONTRACTOR/OWNER/DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE 2'l.4 MIN. APPROPRIATE CLEARANCES FROM THESE AGENCIES PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCES OR GRADING. 54 NO 67 NO 91 NO 20% MAX. r EARTHWORK UANTITI ES: 60.0' 55 ] YES 68 N0 82 NO ** 2' BENCH SLOPE HEIGHTREQUIRED LESSIF L�HANPE HS!G EE SECTION GREATER R 2X MIN. PAD ELEV. ____ 49.0 53.8 20X MAX. ,.i � 56 NO 69 NO 93 NO SECTION •A-A'' CUT = 900 CUBIC YARDS (50 C.Y./LOT) a 57 YES 70 NO 94 NO FILL = 900 CUBIC YARDS (50 C.Y./LOT) 2' So 25 50 100 N.T.S. 65 NO 71 NO 95 NO * FOOTING EMBEDMENT LEGEND _ GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"= 50DEPTHS SHALL CONFORM N oINDEX MAP 66 NO 90 NO 96 NO TO 97 UBC SEC. 18061 AC - ASPHALT CONCRETE TF - TOP OF FOOTING-- 6 LO ■ ■ 21 REQUIREMENTS, I.E. 12" PAD ELEV. MIN FOR 1 STORY AND P.L. ups BF BACKFLOW PREVENTER TG - TOP OF GRATE ,rte 18" MIN. FOR 2 STORIES, DF -- DEEPENED FOOTING •�•�_ ._ - �.. - TRACT BOUNDARY w 5 56 w _ ■ ■ ■ DW --� DRIVEWAY - FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED_____ 1� z MIN. o s MIN. FG - FINISHED GRADE - ---- --- PUB I TI ITY M NT PLAN 2Y GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 1 FL - FLOW LINE L C U L EASE E 2 820 SF PLAN � EROSION CONTROL BERM F.L.FL15'-20' TYP. � �"�` c� FS FINISHED SURFACE - SLOPE (2:1 MAX.) PLAN 1 ' 3 322 SF INTERNAL._ slaEs „IF.SLOPES LESS THAN 5' 10' MIN. ? m 3' FL ©I GB GRADE BREAK 2,621 SF HOUSE PLAN LEGEND ' P.L" J MIN. '�` m GF - GARAGE FLOOR 90 - LOT NUMBER HP - HIGH POINT PLAN 4C - HOUSE PLAN TYPE N.T.S. SECTION •p_De 2' 9 _ o FL 3' z 0. INV -•- INVERT FF=1109.67 - FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION N.T.S. MIN. ao - - - - PAD ELEV. �` ' MIN. TC -- TOP OF CURBVis`i. - _EAD._F1 VATION -. FOOTING TO BE "� _z EXTRA DEPTH OF � � PAD ELEV. ::�--� RE BENCH MARK COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE B.M. T-29--81 BASIS OF BEARING Underground 2 1 2" BRASS DISC IN CONC. CYLINDER LOCATED FROM THE INTERSECTION 1° PLANS (TYP) 2- OF :. / THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A PORTION DIMENSIONED ON _ Service Alert OF FRONT ST. AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, 1.8 MILES N.E. ON RANCHO OF THE CENTERLINE OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AS qX of Southern California CALIFORNIA ROAD TO THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NUMBER 23432 RECORDED IN OWNER/DEVELOPER: . .�: 2X MIN. 6" MIN. 2% MIN. �- 20?4 MAX. 20X MAX. Call: TOLL FREE MARGARITA ROAD, IN THE N.W. CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION 1 E. OFA BOOK 159, PAGES 38 THROUGH 61 OF MAPS, RECORDS GREYSTONE HOMES �'�' :. * PAD ELEV. e 1 -800 7' CHAIN LINK FENCE, 21'x 16' AROUND SO. CALIF. GAS VALVES, 40' N. OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING N 2756'23"W 40980 COUNTY CENTER DR., SUITE 110 PAD SECTION B-Bw OF P.P. (NO.#) 94' N. OF THE CENTERLINE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD. • � • - 422--4133 FIBERGLASS WITNESS POST SET 1' W. OF MONUMENT. TEMECULA, CA. 92591 sECTIoN (i C 2X MIN. N.T.S. ® LD03 316GR TWO 11111101I DAYS BEFORE You DIC ADJ. DATE 9/13/82 ELEV. 1128.410 TEL. (909) 719-1464 N.T.S. 20X MAX. LD03- 183GR CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS DATE ACC'D BENCH MARK SEAL: The Keith Companies " PLAN SCALE AS NOTED CITY OF T . � ADD WALL TO LOT 93 / ESS/ ` l9 Drawing No. contractor � RECOMMENDED BY: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS \\,\,'"M s PROFILE SCALE DATE: SEE ABOVE Inland Empire DivisionI or o Cwt�e AwI Suit .� A brw�o CSI 92553-9024 909 653-0234 53613 ' t ACCEPTED BY: DATE: /t 2 PRECISE GRADING PLANS 15*, OBI PI s P p ed Under Supervision Of RONALD J. PARKS Completed N_ _ o RAW DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS PHASE 3 TRACT NO. 23143-10 & 11 CML a� Date L 7 D N BY. KS CP rA�_ DESIGN BY: MM LOTS 54-57, 65--71 do 90-96 R.C.E No. Expires ,� _--_-_ 46--30--07 ___- Sheet of P CHECKED BY: R.C.E No. 19744 Expires 930 OS � 1 2 ............... ...... P 11"rd JIM, :01 72 74 ......... c/?0 FH AV/AR b 97 A q * 140.04 F -Ai IG 07 735 W.V 1.0% w JD.0 I I Ur 20- 20-0r 10.X 4b 15.0' 2-OX IFF-1301.80 FLAN lot fn r MIN. M-1301.3 --- 10 Won'1301.0 0.71 1 PAID-1301.3 2-� 2:1 89 74-r M 7 C)+ .4 MIN. -37 1+32., 5 IN 0 ZM. k 1 66 47.4' ry / / .,� -._ 9 �L 16.0'D J FG TL-- i% f 1.0% L-J- 1 3, / T 1\1*.. ....... - a,.-.- - - 01- --- Nps ---- w . - U w -'0 1.0% AV/AR 63.7* 1" 2R L.3A W-IM.40 INC .9 .......... PAD-1294.9 / �°e' _ =--�_.. .9 11+01 Ka L L 1 6-C 74 PLAN I R k 2.OX 71 MIN. PF-1295.90 91 CX\ PAID-1295.0 PLAN 1 W.4 r. 04 IFF-1204.00 % PLAN 31t V-1 F%wq- PAID-1293.5 FF-1302.10 3IR So 16 PAID-1301.6 PF-1302M PAD-1301.7 *Alp Or 73 65 as 2.0% PAID-1314.8 - 9.D p' L- �'I r... C4 PLAN 1111 MIN. FF-1291.00 / / / .97 16 40.007 PAID-1290.5 - 3 190 1.0% > ............. -- ...............0I - --i . Q "k-ft" 4bj* Ir FH 2:1 C4 ri 2.30 Q+ LLJ 2.7X 2.2X / / iE� 1 04 IFF-130210 9,87-F.-T�.Uf If AD 20-W - PLM 2 CL PAD-1302.0 - ��' / / W-1302.90 P -1302.0 2.OX MIN cb 87 MIN. Ll PAID-1315.5 10.0 PLAN 3 ....... FS FIF 1295.90 25.3 1-10 PAD-1295.0 2 1 23- J.UA IFF-129,.3 0 g - / // //�' / WA??!)R '� 1f 1.03PAD-1290.5 13-1- 7. n / / b L5.2Acli 0 Iiiiii ir no 1288. 0 (7)LA. 2:1 PLM 31t ...........job ....... .0 p MMI Op 02 AV/AR �7• - . / Dim 2.0 Ir FH .(Y% $4.01 0 *4? JAM- # 86.16 f ------ 0; -, -- Q l l 6. �j aFI7 P fV 86 Nk 4�' / PAD-1315.6 0!r .. - h' t - `'' l FH b an v / Q W) 2:1 r-L PLAN 3 14 97 � 9 / /�z b / Ib FF-1 291.70 � / PAD-1291.2 r / / / / 34 PLM I 1r, / / / A3. I IFF-1300.70 53 UB�rl- WAIT %T PLAN 3 54 PAID-1294-2 1A P%D-1300.2 JW 3 V6 76 Ww'1303.10 // / V / RE RAS AA 57 Y SSPEPLAN 2 PAID-1302.6 13-V 14.84 Wm i 297.n v H, / 52 I POO-12973 14 .0W / / / / l / PF]�J' a 1M. FF-1305.70 PAID-1290-9 0* PAD-1305.2 • 1k 0.1 1 sow e I .e' .� �► / / / MID-1307.!! • , ' / L F 00. 51 / / PAD-1287.3 PAID-1310.4 *4 / O / / 60 ' / PAID-1313.2 OIL%. _% . 0 co lab, os 50 FAID-1283-8 �. rte. s. .�' BPI �• M o //S h C �/ 4A SE E* E HARWICK LAN jr WX 'PI ..................... .low .0i 49 PAID 1302.8 48 PAD-13w.6 47 FWD-1305.2 INDEX MAP 46 PAD-1310.8 30 Isso 91 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=30' A LD03-316CR LD03-183GR CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS DATE CC'D BENCH MARK SEAL: The Keith Companies PLAN SCALE , %/ 1"=30' CITY OF TEM ECULA ADD WALL TO LOT 93EDrawing No. . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Contrwtor RECOMMENDED BY. ole stge�djea DATE: Inland Empire Division PROFILE SCALE --------- ,,, ,,. SEE, SHEET 1 *d)w AWN^ 10 X9 Awom %ft CA rM3-i ") W-030 PRECISE GRADING PLANS w 53613 0 1 ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 64> Dcft Ew 08/" PI s ared Under Supervision Of RONALD J. PARKS TRACT NO. 23143-10 and 11 Compft - V A# A IL DRAWN BY: KS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBW WORKS A*it 4-3d PHASE 3 C MAL R.C.E No. Expires 06-30-07 DESIGN BY: MM 19744 I CHECKED BY: MWS &ph !DN/05 .. - LOTS 54-57v 65-71 AND 90-96 Sheet 2 Of 2