Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout062320 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 23, 2020 - 7:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time the item for Public Comments is called. Email comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time public comments are closed on the agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda items for this Council meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Pro Tempore Maryann Edwards INVOCATION: TBD FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank Page 1 City Council Agenda June 23, 2020 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation Attachments That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Agenda Report 2. Approve Action Minutes of June 9, 2020 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of June 9, 2020. Attachments: Action Minutes 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Attachments RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands 4. Approve City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2020 Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of Page 2 City Council Agenda June 23, 2020 5. April 30, 2020. Attachments: Agenda Report Treasurer's Report Approve Third Amendment to Lease Agreement Between City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau DBA Visit Temecula Valley Recommendation: Attachments: That the City Council approve the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between the City of Temecula and Visit Temecula Valley (VTV) and authorize the Assistant City Manager to execute the amendment. Agenda Report Amendment RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 3 City Council Agenda June 23, 2020 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 6. Approve Action Minutes of June 9, 2020 Recommendation Attachments That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of June 9, 2020. Action Minutes CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, July 14, 2020, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 4 City Council Agenda June 23, 2020 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 7. Receive Update on Proposed Temporary Expanded Dininp-/Retail Program in Old Town Recommendation: That the City Council receive an update on the proposed temporary expanded dining/retail program in Old Town and provide general direction to staff. Attachments: Agenda Report 6/9/2020 - Agenda Report 8. Consider the Vacancv on the Citv Council and Provide Direction Re2ardin2 the Same Recommendation: That the City Council consider the vacancy resulting from the resignation of James Stewart and provide direction on whether to fill the vacancy by Council appointment or election. Attachments: Agenda Report 9. Consider the Vacancy of the Position of Mayor and Provide Direction Regarding the Same Recommendation: That the City Council consider the vacancy of the position of Mayor and provide direction regarding the same. Attachments: Agenda Report 10. Consider Appointments to 2020 City Council Committees Recommendation: That the City Council appoint members to serve on existing City Council Committees for the balance of calendar year 2020 and evaluate the need for an additional committee. Attachments: Agenda Report 2020 Council Committee Assignments DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 11. Community Development Department Monthly Report Page 5 City Council Agenda June 23, 2020 Attachments: Agenda Report Planning Activity Report Statistics Charts 12. Fire Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Fire Report 13. Police Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report 14. Public Works Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Project Status Report COMMISSION REPORTS PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, July 14, 2020, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 6 Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 9, 2020 - 7:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N 29 20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID 19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N 29 20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time the Mayor calls the item for Public Comments. Email comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time the Mayor closes public comments on the agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda items for this Council meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting. CALL TO ORDER at 7:00 PM: Mayor Pro Tempore Maryann Edwards INVOCATION: Aaron Adams FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Rahn ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on non-agendized items: • Kristiana Ruiz • Stephanie Tabares • Jessica Ward • Christopher Bout • Eva Smith • Ana L. Moreno • Gia Rueda • Courtney Sheehan • Israel Mazariegos • Charity Barczyszyn • Savannah McLaughlin 0 Karen Wilson-Bonnar • Saman Arzo • Allen Kugi • Amber Sosa • Frederick Ricky Denham Il • Alyssa Garcia • Rain Rosilez • Judy C. Torres • Karleigh Shepard • Victoria Serrano • Ginger Hitzke • Sarah Velotta • Abram Cerda • Mia Michael • Annabelle Flectcher • Delainey Pack • Mackenzie Orr • Emily Kim • Gabriella Waltz • Chris Mitchell • Nicolo Villasis • Kirk Lentz • Jonathan Chang • Emily Carian • Laurel LaMont • Sherry Bondy • Riley Wold • S. Fairchild • Abraham Tehrani • Kathryn Wright • Teresa Dugan Mansfield • Sally Price • Ashley Clingingsmith • Reina Diaz • Tim McDonald • Tami Sims • Frederic Ball • Nathan Price • Ira L. Robinson • Chris Smith • Leanne Gaffney • Sarah Payton • Alicia Rosenthal • Anonymous • Ronald L. Prentice • Shire The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on agendized items: • Al Rubio (11) • Cherise Manning (11) • Kim Kelliher (11) • Brian Connors (11) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2. Approve Action Minutes of May 21 and May 26, 2020 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of May 21 and May 26, 2020. 2 3. 4. 5. 6. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2020-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Adopt Ordinance 2020-06 Amending Chapter 17.21 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone of the Temecula Municipal Code (Long Range Project No. LR20-0279) (Second Readingl Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO.2020-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.21 REGARDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3) Adopt Resolution Reaffirming and Proclaiming the Existence of a Local Emergency Related to the COVID-19 Virus Pandemic Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2020-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REAFFIRMING AND PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATING TO THE COVID-19 VIRUS PANDEMIC AND ISSUING CERTAIN ORDERS FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY AFFAIRS DURING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY Adopt Resolutions Regarding the November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the following resolutions regarding the November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election: RESOLUTION NO. 2020-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING 3 OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2020, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES RESOLUTION NO. 2020-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2020 WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE RESOLUTION NO. 2020-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2020 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION FOR ELECTIVE OFFICES IN THE EVENT OF A TIE VOTE AT ANY MUNICIPAL ELECTION 7. Receive and File the 2019 General Plan Annual Progress Report Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the 2019 General Plan Annual Progress Report (GPAPR). RECESS: At 8:37 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting. At 8:40 PM, the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL / COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT JOINT PUBLIC HEARING 9. Approve Update to the 2017-22 Citizen Participation Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2019-20 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan Recommendation: That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled: 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT AN UPDATED CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN SETTING THE CITY'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK PROGRAM (CDBG) FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN, ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING, ANNUAL ACTION PLANS, ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS, SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTS, AND DISASTER RECOVERY AND SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2020-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE 2019-20 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 10. Approve Fiscal Years 2021-25 Capital Improvement Program . (CIP) and Adopt Fiscal Year 2020-21 CIP and Annual Operating Budgets for the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment A.gency_(SARDA) Recommendation: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2020-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021-25 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2020-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET, ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS, ESTABLISHING CONTRACT AUTHORITY OF THE GENERAL MANAGER, ESTABLISHING LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY OF THE GENERAL MANAGER 5 RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2020-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2021-25, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2020-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET, ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS, ESTABLISHING CONTRACT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER, ESTABLISHING LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER RESOLUTION NO. 2020-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AND SALARY SCHEDULE RESOLUTION NO. 2020-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. BUSINESS 11. Provide General Direction to Staff on a Proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program in Old Town Recommendation: That the City Council provide general direction to staff on whether to proceed with a proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program in Old Town. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSION REPORTS c PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 9:58 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 23, 2020, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Adjourned in memory of George Floyd Maryann Edwards, Mayor Pro Tempore ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Approve List of Demands PREPARED BY: Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,808,179.02. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of June, 2020. Maryann Edwards, Mayor Pro Tempore ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of June, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 05/28/2020 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/04/2020 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/28/2020 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 06/04/2020 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 505,076.46 659,475.86 466,096.37 177,530.33 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 6/23/2020 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 1,808,179.02 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 560,152.04 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 455.50 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 6,527.46 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5,393.12 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 108,247.06 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 251.68 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 3,432.37 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R STREET ROAD MAINTENANCE 2,500.00 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 11,515.59 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 3,727.25 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 256,884.50 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,120.71 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 746.25 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 52,367.63 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 2,812.44 340 FACILITIES 52,202.52 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE 117.51 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNS HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 117.61 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 117.61 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 133.22 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 117.61 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 148.85 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 117.61 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 2,799.93 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 2,005.89 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAND 1,792.05 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 380.76 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 2,181.86 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 1,236.13 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 875.49 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 8,205.50 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 183.52 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 544.66 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 116.69 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 5,114.86 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 1,244.08 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 854.78 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE 564.41 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 1,715.05 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 111.57 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 7,100.92 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 3,897.88 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 12,888.88 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 21,906.25 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 240.46 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 299.00 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 7,055.68 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 2,424.07 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 127.89 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 321.59 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 8,986.94 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 169.39 $ 1,164,552.32 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 437,996.50 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 1,258.43 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 8,705.48 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 121,397.86 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 500.12 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 2,418.02 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 374.54 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 2,655.02 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,871.39 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1,590.06 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 49,038.90 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 5,181.78 340 FACILITIES 8,266.18 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE 232.76 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 232.64 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 232.64 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 288.46 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 232.64 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 344.30 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 232.64 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 0.01 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREI 0.89 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAN 0.02 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 0.17 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 0.89 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUP 0.46 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 0.89 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 96.69 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 0.05 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 0.36 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 0.08 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 147.75 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELC 0.89 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOME 0.28 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE 0.25 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 1.05 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 0.02 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 3.90 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 2.08 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 92.23 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 95.71 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 0.13 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 0.27 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 62.78 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 1.73 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADIT] 0.04 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 0.27 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 66.32 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRJ 0.13 TOTAL BY FUND: 643,626.70 $ 1,808,179.02 apChkLst 05/28/2020 12:18:21PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 8818 5/22/2020 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER VARI APR WATER 3026656 31367 LA 11,667.70 11,667.70 DISTRICT SERENA 8819 5/28/2020 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 899.07 899.07 SUPPORT 8820 5/28/2020 021301 ICMARETIREMENT-PLAN ICMA-401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN 1,134.62 1,134.62 106474 PAYMENT 8821 5/28/2020 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 13,581.25 13,581.25 303355 PAYMENT 8822 5/28/2020 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAXES PAYMENT 24,818.87 24,818.87 8823 5/28/2020 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT 84,026.43 84,026.43 8824 5/28/2020 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 10,959.93 10,959.93 SOLUTION 8825 5/28/2020 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT 28.51 28.51 SOLUTION PAYMENT 8826 5/28/2020 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT 615.14 615.14 SOLUTION PAYMENT 8827 5/28/2020 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 107,116.82 107,116.82 RETIREMENT) 8828 5/18/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-30-066-2889 30051 RANCHO CAL 12.78 12.78 8829 5/18/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-40-765-3021 28916 PUJOL ST 32.27 32.27 8830 5/18/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-40-765-3179 28922 PUJOL ST 80.18 80.18 8831 5/18/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-29-974-7899 26953 YNEZ RD 162.76 162.76 8832 5/18/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-30-608-9384 28582 HARVESTON 289.62 289.62 DR 8833 5/18/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-02-351-5281 30875 RANCHO 2,733.29 2,733.29 VISTA RD Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 O5/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 8834 5/18/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-05-791-8807 31587 TEM PKWY 8836 5/19/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-29-223-9571 30395 MURRIETA HOT SPR 8837 5/19/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-31-419-2659 26706 YNEZ RD 8838 5/19/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-28-171-2620 40820 WINCHESTER RD 8841 5/20/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 32131 S LOOP RD 8842 5/20/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST 8843 5/20/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 28816 PUJOL ST 8844 5/26/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 42569 MARGARITA RD 8845 5/26/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 30875 RANCHO VISTA RD 8846 5/26/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 30600 PAUBA RD 8847 5/20/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY 8848 5/20/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY 8849 5/22/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- EXTERNAL DMV LINE 8850 5/22/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 8851 5/26/2020 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER APR WATER 32131 S LOOP RD DIST 8852 5/26/2020 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER APR WATER 32131 S LOOP RD DIST 8853 5/26/2020 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER APR WATER 31991 RORIPAUGH DIST VALLEY RD Amount Paid Check Total 8,809.03 8,809.03 11.92 11.92 144.97 144.97 545.93 545.93 237.21 237.21 282.12 282.12 586.83 586.83 586.83 586.83 586.83 586.83 598.03 598.03 5.31 5.31 5.31 5.31 111.84 111.84 130.98 130.98 53.79 53.79 95.28 95.28 98.48 98.48 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 05/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 8854 5/26/2020 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER APR WATER 39656 DIEGO DR DIST 8855 5/26/2020 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER APR WATER 32131 S LOOP RD DIST 8856 5/26/2020 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER APR WATER 31991 RORIPAUGH DIST VALLEY RD 8857 5/22/2020 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY APR 091-085-1632-041951 MORAGARD 8858 5/22/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-33-237-4818 30499 RANCHO CAL 8859 5/26/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-29-974-7568 26953 YNEZ RD 8860 5/26/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-31-693-9784 26036 YNEZ RD 8861 5/22/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-26-887-0789 40233 VILLAGE RD 8862 5/22/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-00-397-5059 33340 CAMINO PIEDRA 201618 5/28/2020 019075 ADORAMA INC MISC A/V PROD. EQUIP: PEG SUPPLIES 201619 5/28/2020 021830 ALL AMERICAN FIRE SYSTEMS REFUND: PERMIT F19-4226 CONTRACTOR 201620 5/28/2020 013015 ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW TESTING SVC: MEADOWS BACKFLOW, AKA NANETTE PKWY SEMAN 201621 5/28/2020 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: BC INC MPSC FACILITY SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES:HUMAN SVCS PRGRMS TCSE SUPPLIES:TVM EVENTS & EXHIBITS COVID-19 SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE SMALLTOOLS -PREV MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT MISC OFC SUPPLIES: COVID-19 201622 5/28/2020 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF AFN Amount Paid Check Total 124.53 124.53 207.74 207.74 761.37 761.37 395.13 395.13 108.34 108.34 109.48 109.48 364.21 364.21 1,849.46 1,849.46 3,927.32 3,927.32 455.50 455.50 223.00 223.00 27.00 27.00 610.71 506.74 235.19 203.51 108.92 67.96 35.88 32.60 28.99 1,830.50 340.50 340.50 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 O5/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 201623 5/28/2020 021689 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC CEQAANALYSIS: ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY 201624 5/28/2020 011666 B P S TACTICAL INC TACTICAL BALLISTIC VEST COVER: POPTEAM 201625 5/28/2020 011348 BONCOR WATER SYSTEMS MAY WTR TANK FILTER REPL: STA 73 LLC, DBA SUNSHINE WATER SOFT 201626 5/28/2020 008013 BOSTRE-LE, ANNIE COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM: BOSTRE-LE, A. 201627 5/28/2020 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES MAY 11 CANON COPIERS LEASE: INC LIBRARY 201628 5/28/2020 018828 CASC ENGINEERING AND, APR MISC ENG SVCS: WQMP/PLAN CK CONSULTING INC SVCS ENG/GIS SVCS:CATCH BASIN DEVICE At ENG SVCS:BTRFLD STG RD PH III, PW1E MISC ENG SVCS: WATER CONVERSION MAR WQMP PLAN CK - PW13-09 TPL 201629 5/28/2020 020025 CIVIL SOURCE INC MAR ENG SVCS: BUTTERFIELD STG, PW15-11 MAR ENG SVCS: BUTTERFIELD STG, PVA MAR PROF SVCS:LIBRARY PRKG PH IIIJ 201630 5/28/2020 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS CHARITIES PAYMENT 201631 5/28/2020 021230 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR DISTR, DBA CALIF ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 201632 5/28/2020 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 MISC SUPPLIES - MPSC 201633 5/28/2020 017038 CPS HR CONSULTING EMPLOYEE TRAINING 11/13/19-HR 201634 5/28/2020 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & KITCHEN REPAIR - STAT 73 HVAC INC 201635 5/28/2020 019325 CROWELL, PAULA COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM: CROWELL, P. 201636 5/28/2020 012600 DAVID EVANS AND MAR DSGN SVCS: TPL PARKING PH II ASSOCIATES INC PW13-09 Amount Paid Check Total 3,791.00 3,791.00 600.30 600.30 279.96 279.96 1,872.33 1,872.33 671.56 671.56 8,875.50 7,646.50 4,640.18 4,266.00 572.99 26,001.17 17,128.75 14,490.00 5,800.00 37,418.75 4.00 4.00 736.51 598.13 297.43 108.75 1,740.82 1,298.62 1,298.62 1,000.00 1,000.00 642.71 642.71 2,000.00 2,000.00 5,220.00 5,220.00 Page:4 apChkLst 05/28/2020 12:18:21PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 201637 5/28/2020 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 126.79 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT 101.71 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV 69.62 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT 879.04 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI 824.99 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW CIP 233.68 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC DIV 228.66 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE 178.53 2,643.02 201638 5/28/2020 002577 ENGINEERING RESOURCES APR ENG SVCS: OVERLAND DR: 11,582.00 PW16-06 APR ENG SVCS: SIDEWALK: 5TH ST: PW 5,045.00 16,627.00 201639 5/28/2020 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 4/22-4/30 EXP MAIL SVCS: FIRE 103.04 103.04 201640 5/28/2020 021831 GARRISON, JANET REFUND: CRC KITCKEN RENTAL6/19 & 1,265.00 1,265.00 6/20 201641 5/28/2020 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES:BLDG & SAFETY 163.06 INC OFC SUPPLIES -PLANNING 104.02 OFC SUPPLIES -PLANNING 17.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES:BLDG & SAFETY 13.14 297.40 201642 5/28/2020 003792 GRAINGER MISC SAFETY SUPPLIES PW PARKS 54.70 54.70 201643 5/28/2020 002109 HD SUPPLY CONSTR. SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 1,033.33 LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP CONST MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 855.95 1,889.28 201644 5/28/2020 020420 HOWE, HUNTER COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM: HOWE, 2,000.00 2,000.00 H. 201645 5/28/2020 003571 INTLASSN OF PLUMBING AND, MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:CLEMENTS, 300.00 300.00 MECHANICAL OFFICIAL-IAPMO B. 91674 201646 5/28/2020 021180 INTUIPLAN LLC, DBA JOLT SFTWR RENEWAL:CRC STAFF 2,159.76 2,159.76 SCHEDULING 201647 5/28/2020 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 1/17-3/31 GEOTECH:BTRFLD PH3, 32,047.15 PW15-11 APR GEOTECH SVC:BTRFLD STG,PW15- 8,383.20 REVIEW:PROPOSED CONGREGATE HO( 2,200.00 42,630.35 201648 5/28/2020 021828 MAGNUM REALTY GROUP INC, HOMELESS PREV PRGM: SANTOYO 1,395.00 1,395.00 MANAGEMENT ONE PROFESSION Pages apChkLst 05/28/2020 12:18:21PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 201649 5/28/2020 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA MISC SIGNAGE:PW PARKS 1,293.00 ATHACO INC CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP 1,147.21 MISC SIGNAGE:PW PARKS 964.36 CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP 779.84 CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP 484.39 4,668.80 201650 5/28/2020 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC APR CDBG ADMIN SVCS 4,425.00 APR LABOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING 166.25 4,591.25 201651 5/28/2020 013827 MIKO MOUNTAINLION INC LIEFER ROAD REGRADE 2,500.00 2,500.00 201652 5/28/2020 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CRC 453.14 INC MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PW PARK, 99.80 552.94 201653 5/28/2020 016883 MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT, MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: 90.00 90.00 ASSOCIATION OF SO CALIF KELLY-LEHNER, L. 201654 5/28/2020 003663 PECHANGA BAND OF FEB CULTURAL 1,279.25 1,279.25 LUISENO, MISSION INDIANS MONITOR: F.V.PKWY/1-1 5,PH. 11 201655 5/28/2020 018462 PERDUE ROBERT S DBA, APPRAISAL SRVCS:PLNG DEPT 8,000.00 8,000.00 PERDUE RUSSELL & MATTHIES 201656 5/28/2020 012904 PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN APR PLAN REVIEW SRVCS:FIRE PREV 1,081.50 1,081.50 AND, CONSULTING 201657 5/28/2020 008605 PSOMAS 3/27-4/23 CONSULT SRVC:PECH 6,100.00 6,100.00 PKWY,11-01 201658 5/28/2020 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, RENEW PERMIT:SAM HICKS PRK 146.00 146.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SNACK BAR DEPT 201659 5/28/2020 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVCS:CIVIC CENTER 35.23 35.23 LOCKSMITH SRVC 201660 5/28/2020 021829 SIMON LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE EXEC STAFF LEADERSHIP TRNG 3/5/20 4,000.00 4,000.00 INC, THE 201661 5/28/2020 000645 SMART AND FINAL INC MISC SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES 184.74 184.74 PRGM 201662 5/28/2020 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY, FY19/20 AQMD FEE:FOC 137.63 MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FY19/20 AQMD FEE:CIVIC CENTER 137.63 FY19/20AQMD FEE:LIBRARY 137.63 412.89 201663 5/28/2020 003000 STATE WATER RESOURCE STORM WATER PERM IT1-15/SR-79S 1,492.00 1,492.00 CONTROL, BOARD Page.-6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 05/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 201664 5/28/2020 017814 STC TRAFFIC INC APR FIBER OPTIC COMM SYS UPGRD, 13,770.00 PW18-05 APR TRAF SGNL SYS UPGRADE:HSIP C) 195.00 201665 5/28/2020 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC MAY SWEEPING SVCS: PRKG 540.00 STRUCTURE 201666 5/28/2020 006529 TEMECULA VALLEY GARDEN REFUND: CC RENTAL CANCELLED 200.00 CLUB 6/9/20 201667 5/28/2020 020967 TESLA ENERGY REFUND: PERMIT B20-0747 126.72 CANCELLED 201668 5/28/2020 003487 VETERANS OF FOREIGN FY19/20 COMMUNITY SERVICE 4,784.00 WARS 4089 FUNDING 201669 5/28/2020 008668 WES FLOWERS SUNSHINE FUND 61.43 201670 5/28/2020 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE AGRMNT PMT:STREETLIGHT 13,099.93 COUNCIL OF, GOVERNMENTS IMPLEMENTATION (WRCOG) 201671 5/28/2020 004567 WITCHER ELECTRIC, AKA ELECTRICAL SRVCS:PUMP TRACK, 1,485.00 TERRENCE KEVIN WITCHE PW18-04 Grand total for UNION BANK: 13, 965.00 540.00 200.00 126.72 4,784.00 61.43 13,099.93 1,485.00 505,076.46 Page-7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 O5/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA 96 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 505,076.46 Page:8 apChkLst 06/04/2020 9:09:02AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 8864 5/29/2020 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER VARI APR WATER 3001040 SPORTS 19,939.92 19,939.92 DISTRICT PARK 8865 5/29/2020 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY APR 015-575-0195-2 32211 WOLF 144.00 144.00 VALLEY RD 8866 5/27/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST 46.48 46.48 8867 5/29/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 41845 6TH ST 586.83 586.83 8868 5/29/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 28922 PUJOL ST 586.83 586.83 8869 5/28/2020 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAY INTERNET SVCS- 32380 DEER 586.83 586.83 HOLLOW WAY 8870 6/1/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL 5,340.56 5,340.56 8871 6/1/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL 2,695.70 2,695.70 8872 6/1/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- MPSC 150.98 150.98 8873 5/28/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- MPSC 194.92 194.92 8874 5/28/2020 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAY INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL 295.98 295.98 8875 6/4/2020 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAXES PAYMENT 14,657.33 14,657.33 8876 6/4/2020 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT 43,438.15 43,438.15 8877 5/26/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-30-099-3847 29721 RYECREST 11.74 11.74 8878 5/29/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON APR 2-30-296-9522 46679 PRIMROSE 25.82 25.82 AVE 8879 5/29/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-28-331-4847 32805 PAUBA RD 74.60 74.60 8880 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-34-624-4452 32131 S LOOP RD 1,337.48 1,337.48 Page-1 apChkLst 06/04/2020 9:09:02AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 8881 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-33-357-5785 44747 REDHAWK 24.14 24.14 PKWY 8882 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-41-072-5394 29429 TEM PKWY 57.55 57.55 8883 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-40-576-0232 44173 14.72 14.72 BUTTERFIELD STG 8884 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-35-164-3515 32932 LEENA WAY 12.01 12.01 8885 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-35-164-3663 42335 MEADOWS 12.01 12.01 PKWY 8886 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-35-164-3242 44270 MEADOWS 11.78 11.78 PKWY 8887 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-35-164-3770 43487 13.36 13.36 BUTTERFIELD STG 8888 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-29-933-3831 43230 BUS PK DR 2,225.46 2,225.46 8889 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-21-981-4720 30153 TEM PKWY 15.76 15.76 8890 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 241-072-5246 29429 TEM PKWY 36.30 36.30 8891 6/1/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-28-904-7706 32329 OVERLAND 132.60 132.60 TRL 8892 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-35-421-1260 41955 4TH ST 11.44 11.44 8893 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-31-419-2873 43000 HWY 395 11.74 11.74 8894 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-29-657-2787 41638 11.74 11.74 WINCHESTER RD 8895 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-34-333-3589 41702 MAIN ST 11.88 11.88 8896 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-29-807-1226 28077 DIAZ RD 12.15 12.15 8897 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAY 2-29-807-1093 28079 DIAZ RD 12.15 12.15 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 06/04/2020 9:09:02AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 8898 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8899 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8900 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8901 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8902 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8903 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8904 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8905 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8906 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8907 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8908 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8909 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8910 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 8911 6/2/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 201615 5/27/2020 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RECORDER 201616 5/27/2020 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RECORDER 201617 5/27/2020 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RECORDER (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MAY 2-31-031-2616 27991 DIAZ RD 12.58 12.58 MAY 2-31-282-0665 27407 DIAZ RD 12.69 12.69 MAY 2-41-502-0478 28402 MERCEDES 23.29 23.29 ST MAY 2-14-204-1615 30027 FRONT ST 23.53 23.53 MAY 2-31-536-3481 41902 MAIN ST 120.52 120.52 MAY 2-19-171-8568 28300 MERCEDES 157.47 157.47 ST MAY 2-02-502-8077 43210 BUS PK DR 273.57 273.57 MAY 2-18-937-3152 28314 MERCEDES 474.63 474.63 ST MAY 2-02-351-4946 41845 6TH ST 728.34 728.34 MAY 2-31-912-7494 28690 MERCEDES 878.01 878.01 ST MAY 2-31-536-3655 41904 MAIN ST 1,326.06 1,326.06 MAY 2-29-224-0173 32364 OVERLAND 1,993.35 1,993.35 TRL MAY 2-00-397-5042 43200 BUS PK DR 3,354.17 3,354.17 MAY 2-32-903-8293 41000 MAIN ST 16,779.48 16,779.48 NOE FEE:LR20-0209 OLD TOWN SPA 50.00 50.00 NOE FEE:LR18-1506 (CEQA 50.00 50.00 TRANSPORT) NOE FEE:LR20-0279 AFFORDABLE 50.00 50.00 HOUSING Page.-3 apChkLst 06/04/2020 9:09:02AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 201672 6/4/2020 002786 4N6XPRT SYSTEMS FORENSIC SOFTWARE 250.00 250.00 UPDATE:POLICE 201673 6/4/2020 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL K-9 EQUIPMENT: TEMECULA PD 46.33 LLC MAY K9 TRAINING: DAYKA/BORIS: POLIC 350.00 396.33 201674 6/4/2020 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET 212.33 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET 259.06 471.39 201675 6/4/2020 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO MAY DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: 56.57 56.57 POLICE SW ST 201676 6/4/2020 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC POOL TESTING SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 980.98 980.98 201677 6/4/2020 003691 ATS INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS SOFTWARE RENEWAL FOR 2,888.96 2,888.96 INC, DBATRAFFICWARE LLC TRAFFIC:PW 201678 6/4/2020 004262 BIO TOX LABORATORIES PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF 1,241.00 PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF 507.00 1,748.00 201679 6/4/2020 018408 BOB CALLAHAN'S POOL MAY POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT: VAR 950.00 SERVICE FACS MAY POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT: VAR F 1,100.00 2,050.00 201680 6/4/2020 021588 BRAUN PETER, DBA JUN PLANTSCAPE SVCS: CIVIC CTR 500.00 TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE JUN PLANTSCAPE SVCS: TPL 200.00 700.00 201681 6/4/2020 004248 CALIF DEPT OF APR BLOOD & ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: 175.00 175.00 JUSTICE-ACCTING TEM SHERIF 201682 6/4/2020 004241 CALIF DEPT OF STATE REMITTANCE OF AB1379 - QE MAR 1,596.40 1,596.40 ARCHITECT 2020 201683 6/4/2020 001610 CALTRANS, DEPT OF COOPAGMNT 1515/A-1;CITYAGMNT 71.45 71.45 TRANSPORTATION 12-025 201684 6/4/2020 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW IT EQUIPM - STA 92 178.12 GOVERNMENT LLC MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO TECF 2,169.80 IT EQUIPM - STA 92 2,998.70 RACK ENCLOSURE:CRC PD SUBSTATIOI 97.89 5,444.51 201685 6/4/2020 021230 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CRC 1,169.06 1,169.06 DISTR, DBA CALIF ELECTRIC SUPPLY 201686 6/4/2020 017038 CPS HR CONSULTING MID-MGMT LEADERSHIP TRNG 1,200.00 11/13/19-HR PRODUCTIVE TEAMS TIRING 11/6/19-HR 4,450.00 5,650.00 Page:4 apChkLst 06/04/2020 9:09:02AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 201687 6/4/2020 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & PLUMBING SVCS: FIRE STA 84 691.34 HVAC INC MISC PLUMBING SVCS: VAR PARKS 1,028.48 INSTALL COUNTERTOPS: PD STOREFRC 5,800.00 7,519.82 201688 6/4/2020 016098 CULTIVATING GOOD INC, DBA RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT 9,711.28 9,711.28 EAT MARKETPLACE 201689 6/4/2020 012600 DAVID EVANS AND APR DSGN SVCS: DLR SIDEWALKS. 2,032.00 ASSOCIATES INC PW19-18 APR DSGN SVCS: DIAZ RD PROJ PW17-: 28,752.37 30,784.37 201690 6/4/2020 002990 DAVID TURCH AND JUN FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY 5,500.00 5,500.00 ASSOCIATES MGR 201691 6/4/2020 021835 DID WHOLESALE DIST REFUND: VIOLATION DISMISSAL 305.00 305.00 #322455 201692 6/4/2020 008943 DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES MASSAGE APPEAL SVCS: AMAZING 2,625.00 2,625.00 (DGS) MASSAGE 201693 6/4/2020 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL PORTABLE TOILET SVCS: CORONA 124.97 SRVCS VIRUS: PD TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC 95.00 219.97 201694 6/4/2020 019720 DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES MAY WTR QUALITY MAINT:DUCK 6,969.00 6,969.00 INC PND/HARV. 201695 6/4/2020 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV 131.49 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI 31.46 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE 128.55 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI 588.24 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW CIP 90.82 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC 205.39 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 304.46 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT 126.29 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT 697.66 2,304.36 201696 6/4/2020 021836 DRENK, DANYELLE REFUND: VIOLATION DISMISSAL 70.00 70.00 #340513 201697 6/4/2020 020904 ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES INC CONDENSER H2O SYSTEM MAINT: 196.11 196.11 CRC 201698 6/4/2020 002577 ENGINEERING RESOURCES APR ENG SVCS: BIKE TRAIL PGM: 13,286.00 13,286.00 PW19-11 201699 6/4/2020 000164 ESGIL LLC FEB PLAN CK SVCS: BLDG & SAFETY 10,996.74 10,996.74 Page:5 apChkLst O6/04/2020 9:09:02AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 201700 6/4/2020 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS 2,112.60 LOCATIONS IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VAR SLOPES 1,686.52 MAY LDSCP MAINT: MEDIANS 21,133.27 MAY LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW 24,635.75 MULCH: CROWN HILL SLOPE 2,790.00 MAY LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS PV 58,921.01 MAY LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS PN 57,870.52 MAY LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW 40,615.26 MAY OVERLAND EXTENSION PROJ LDS( 300.00 210,064.93 201701 6/4/2020 015330 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, OF APR CDBG SUB -RECIPIENT: FAIR 1,490.66 1,490.66 RIVERSIDE COUNTY INC HOUSING SVC 201702 6/4/2020 010804 FEHR AND PEERS APR CEQA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 19,030.80 19,030.80 UPDATE -VMT 201703 6/4/2020 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS SOUND/LIGHTING & MISC SUPPLIES: 713.33 713.33 THEATER 201704 6/4/2020 017866 GARDEN STATE FIREWORKS DEPOSIT/FIREWORKS DISPLAYATH 19,250.00 19,250.00 INC OF JULY 201705 6/4/2020 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS OFC SUPPLIES: INFO TECH 29.79 INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CENTRAL SVCS 23.32 OFC SUPPLIES: CRC 93.25 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE 59.76 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE 55.20 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 73 88.45 MISC OFC SUPPIES: COVID 19 63.62 OFC SUPPLIES:BLDG & SAFETY 63.62 477.01 201706 6/4/2020 004890 GOLDEN STATE FIRE Sprinkler/Standpipe Inspection: Garage 6,400.00 6,400.00 PROTECTION Page.-6 apChkLst O6/04/2020 9:09:02AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 201707 6/4/2020 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC MISC HDWR SUPPLIES: CODE 130.65 ENFORCEMENT HARDWARE SUPPLIES: VARI FIRE STATI 1,151.67 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS 641.86 MISC SUPPLIES: HARVESTON LAKE PAF 129.61 MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 1,166.29 MAINT SUPPLIES: TCC 2.89 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI DEPTS 127.68 MAINT SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 299.07 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI DEPTS 3,405.20 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI DEPTS 1,579.34 MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC 318.76 MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER 8.99 MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINI 289.84 MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: PW - TRAI 251.55 9,503.40 201708 6/4/2020 012748 HARDYAND HARPER INC PARKING LOT PAVING: CRC 16,072.50 16,072.50 201709 6/4/2020 020628 HASA INC VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC 742.81 742.81 FACILITIES 201710 6/4/2020 002109 HD SUPPLY CONSTR. SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 699.22 699.22 LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP CONST 201711 6/4/2020 013749 HELIXSTORM INC FIREWALL ANNUAL SUB RENEWAL: 1,261.81 1,261.81 INFO TECH 201712 6/4/2020 003198 HOME DEPOT MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER 1,783.27 1,783.27 201713 6/4/2020 012285 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 456.75 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 59.81 516.56 201714 6/4/2020 001091 KEYSER MARSTON FEB FISCAL IMPACT 1,138.75 ASSOCIATES INC ANALYSIS: HElRLOOM JAN REAL ESTATE CONSULT: AFFORDAE 566.02 1,704.77 201715 6/4/2020 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDYAND APR HR LEGAL SVCS FOR 342.00 342.00 W H ITMORE TE060-00001 201716 6/4/2020 018253 LOPEZ, OSCAR REIMB:DOOR BELL-HR COVID 107.66 107.66 SCREENING 201717 6/4/2020 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET 125.64 125.64 ATHACO INC MAINT 201718 6/4/2020 020302 MARIS IMAGING SOLUTIONS DOCUMENT IMAGING SVCS: CITY 17,938.00 17,938.00 LLC CLERK Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 O6/04/2020 9:09:02AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 201719 6/4/2020 019823 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC DEEP CLEANING: IWTCM 201720 6/4/2020 018314 MICHAEL BAKER ENG SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL SVC: ULT. INTRCHG, PW04-08 201721 6/4/2020 021343 MILLER ARCHITECTURAL 3/1-4/30 ARCHITECT SVCS: PW19-06 CORP 201722 6/4/2020 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: TPL INC MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PW PARK 201723 6/4/2020 018099 NATIONAL SAFETY DOT TESTING: HR COMPLIANCE INC 201724 6/4/2020 001323 NESTLE WATERS NORTH WTR DLVRY SVC: TCC AMERICA, DBA READYREFRESH WTR DLVRY SVC: TPL WTR DLVRY SVC: CITY MGR OFC WTR DLVRY SVC: SKATE PARK WTR DLVRY SVC: CRC WTR DLVRY SVC: FOC WTR DLVRY SVC: PBSP WTR DLVRY SVC: THEATER WTR DLVRY SVC: TVM WTR DLVRY SVC: AQUATICS WTR DLVRY SVC: HELP CTR WTR DLVRY SVC: MRC 201725 6/4/2020 021121 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 201726 6/4/2020 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS 201727 6/4/2020 019851 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC PRGS PMT #33: ULT. INTRCHG, PW04-08 201728 6/4/2020 000472 PARADISE CHEVROLET VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT:FIRE CADILLAC 201729 6/4/2020 020472 PARKING LOGIX INC REPEATER FOR AC POWER:PRKG STRUCTURE 201730 6/4/2020 021834 PITT, ROBERTA REFUND: VIOLATION DISMISSAL #340727 Amount Paid Check Total 4,260.00 4,260.00 1,345.00 1,345.00 2,420.00 2,420.00 434.75 404.93 839.68 89.95 89.95 90.93 86.07 87.42 17.22 99.16 123.15 34.44 82.64 65.26 32.60 101.29 8.69 828.87 84.50 84.50 581.15 581.15 9,357.18 9,357.18 163.49 163.49 114.81 114.81 70.00 70.00 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 06/04/2020 9:09:02AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 201731 6/4/2020 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC PRODUCTS INC FACILITIES VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC FACILITIE 201732 6/4/2020 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE SUBSCR:CENTRAL SRVCS 181108943 COMPANY INC 201733 6/4/2020 014379 PROFESSIONAL IMAGE BANNER PROGRAM:ECON DEV ADVERTISING, DBA EXTREME SIGNSGRAPHICS JAN-JUN BANNER MAINT PRGM:ECON C 201734 6/4/2020 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR, MAR'20 PRKG CITATION CONTROLLER ASSESSMENTS APR'20 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 201735 6/4/2020 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO APR EMERG RADIO RENTAL: TEM TECHNOLOGY SHERIFF 201736 6/4/2020 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, RENEW PERMIT:FIRE STN 95 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 201737 6/4/2020 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M HOSPITAL PARADE 2020 PRESTON 201738 6/4/2020 013695 SHRED -IT US JV LLC, DBA: 5/11 DOC SHRED SRVCS: TEM SHRED -IT USA LLC SHERIFF 201739 6/4/2020 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW SIGN POSTING SRVCS 201740 6/4/2020 021647 SO COAST LIGHTING & DESIGN INC 201741 6/4/2020 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 201742 6/4/2020 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, TELEPHONE COMPANY PA19-0940/0941:PLNG SIGN POSTING SRVCS LR20-0209:PLNG SIGN POSTING SRVCS PA20-0192:PLNG REPLACEMENT BOLLARD: MERCEDES STREET PEST CONTROL SRVCS:WOLF CREEK PARK MAY PEST CONTROL SRVCS:CITY FACS PEST CONTROL SRVCES:LOMA LINDA P, PEST CONTROL SRVCS:SPLASH PAD PEST CONTROL SRVCS: FIRE STN 73 JUN GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,2593,9306 Amount Paid Check Total 253.22 594.35 54.11 4,480.00 3,181.75 4,523.00 4,193.17 2,359.72 1.203.00 250.00 20.11 427.50 641.25 213.75 1.865.06 49.00 881.00 94.00 49.00 68.00 603.93 847.57 54.11 7,661.75 8,716.17 2,359.72 1,203.00 250.00 20.11 1,282.50 1,865.06 1,141.00 603.93 Page9 apChkLst 06/04/2020 9:09:02AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 201743 6/4/2020 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT SUPPLIES:COVID-19 7.88 SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES PRGM 43.76 SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES PRGM 21.63 SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES PRGM 23.91 SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES PRGM 73.37 SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK 342.91 CREDIT.SUPPLIES/POLICE MALL STORE -31.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC 277.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC 5.21 SUPPLIES:CRC 22.02 SUPPLIES:POLICE OLD TOWN STOREFF 45.79 833.00 201744 6/4/2020 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CARPET CLEANING:CIVIC CENTER 12,200.00 CLEANING CARPET CLEANING SRVCS:MPSC 175.00 CARPET CLEAN:PD STOREFRONT/VISIT 225.00 12,600.00 201745 6/4/2020 015648 STEIN ANDREW, DBA PARKINK DAY CAMP SUPPLIES:CRC 266.14 SUPPLIES:CRC 207.46 DAY CAMP SUPPLIES:CRC 677.66 1,151.26 201746 6/4/2020 019494 SUPPORT WAREHOUSE HP SUPPORT WARRANTY:INFO TECH 896.48 896.48 LIMITED 201747 6/4/2020 010924 TAND D COMMUNICATIONS CABLING SERVICES:COUNCIL 735.81 735.81 INC CHAMBERS 201748 6/4/2020 019714 TAYLOR'SAPPLIANCE KITCHEN EQUIP: FIRE STN 92 4,623.98 4,623.98 201749 6/4/2020 021361 TELECOM LAW FIRM PC F/N/A, 4/8-5/11 LEGAL SRVCS:PLNG 1,663.00 1,663.00 KRAMER TELECOM LAW FIRM 201750 6/4/2020 010679 TEMECULAAUTO VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT:TCSD 58.16 58.16 REPAIR/RADIATOR, DBAAUTO ENTERPRISE INC 201751 6/4/2020 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS 174.00 COMPANY PARKS PLUMBING SUPPLIES:CIVIC CENTER 28.71 202.71 201752 6/4/2020 016311 TIERCE, NICHOLAS GRAPHIC DESIGN SRVCS: THEATER 2,520.00 2,520.00 201753 6/4/2020 017885 TRANSAMERICAN DIRECT INC. POSTAGE & MAILING:CITYWIDE 2,500.00 2,500.00 RECYCLING 201754 6/4/2020 000161 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC SUPPORT & UPDT-TIME & 3,627.75 3,627.75 ATTENDANCE MOD Page:10 apChkLst 06/04/2020 9:09:02AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 201755 6/4/2020 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE MAY UNDRGRND UTILITY LOCATOR 203.05 ALERT, OF SOUTHERN ALERTS:PW T CALIFORNIA MAY UNDRGRND UTILITY LOCATOR ALE 105.60 308.65 201756 6/4/2020 012549 UPODIUM, AKA JOHN VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES - STA 95 51.56 FONTEYN VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES - STA 92 213.54 VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES - STA 12 325.77 590.87 201757 6/4/2020 013647 VICAR OPERATING, INC., DBA: VET MEDICAL EXAM:DAYKA 5/28 68.90 68.90 VCAANTECH, INC. 201758 6/4/2020 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC CONSTR MGMT SRVCS:PECH.PKWY 13,300.00 13,300.00 CONSULTING INC WIDEN 201759 6/4/2020 007987 WALMART MISC SUPPLIES:FIRE STN 92 272.04 SUPPLIES:HUMAN SRVCS PRGM-SFSP 307.21 579.25 201760 6/4/2020 021833 WALTER, BEVERLEE RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT 89.95 89.95 201761 6/4/2020 001881 WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS PRGM 940.39 940.39 INC 201762 6/4/2020 008668 WES FLOWERS SUNSHINE FUND 63.93 63.93 201763 6/4/2020 003730 WEST COASTARBORISTS INC 4/16-30 EMERG TREE MAINT VAR 3,384.45 SLOPES 4/16-30 TREE MAINT:CAMPOS VERDES 1,228.50 4/16-30 TREE MAINT:VAIL RANCH 9,828.00 4/16-30 TREE MAINT:TEMEKU HILLS 1,512.00 TREE/STUMP REMOVAL:OLD TOWN FRC 3,097.50 19,050.45 201764 6/4/2020 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC APR TRAF ENG SVC:PED SGNL 4,423.97 EQUP,PW19-10 APR TRAF ENG SVC:RDHWK & V.RANCH 1,078.50 5,502.47 Grand total for UNION BANK: 659,475.86 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 O6/04/2020 9:09:02AM CITY OF TEMECULA 144 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 659,475.86 Page:12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Approve City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2020 PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2020. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of April 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2020 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary April 30, 2020 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951)694-6430 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 45,633,534.42 45,633,534.42 45,633,534.42 32.19 1 1 0.684 0.694 Retention Escrow Account 878,851.60 878,851.60 878,851.60 0.62 1 1 0.055 0.056 Letter of Credit 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 Trust Accounts 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 8.19 1 1 6.372 6.460 Local Agency Investment Funds 63,622,507.57 64,098,468.51 63,622,507.57 44.89 1 1 1.625 1.648 Federal Agency Callable Securities 13,000,000.00 13,110,410.00 13,000,000.00 9.17 1,343 452 1.729 1.753 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 7,000,000.00 7,177,350.00 7,000,000.00 4.94 1,122 700 2.001 2.029 141,741,717.68 142,505,438.62 141,741,717.68 100.00% 179 77 1.729 1.753 Investments Cash Passbook/Checking 10,415,831.68 10,415,831.68 10,415,831.68 1 1 0.000 0.000 (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 152,157,549.36 152,921,270.30 152,157,549.36 179 77 1.729 1.753 Total Earnings April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 214,678.34 1,672,033.85 Average Daily Balance 145,288,931.92 140,726,356.77 Effective Rate of Return 1.80% 1.42% Reporting period 04/01/2020-04/30/2020 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2020 Page 1 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 233358001-6 01-2 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 11,359.60 11,359.60 11,359.60 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 233358006-6 01-2 REF RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 508,476.70 508,476.70 508,476.70 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 233358000-6 01-2 REF ST First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 359,689.79 359,689.79 359,689.79 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213009-6 03-02 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213008-6 03-02 IMPR First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 711.68 711.68 711.68 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213006-6 03-02 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 749,582.49 749,582.49 749,582.49 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164741002-6 03-03 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 164741008-6 03-03IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 228,002.24 228,002.24 228,002.24 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164741006-6 03-03RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 408.92 408.92 408.92 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164741000-6 03-03SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 720,373.10 720,373.10 720,373.10 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164742002-6 03-06 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.630 1.608 1.630 1 164742000-6 03-06SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 103,650.69 103,650.69 103,650.69 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 229462007-6 03-1 2012 RF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 3.80 3.80 3.80 0.260 0.256 0.260 1 229462002--6 03-1 BOND FD First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 2,192.43 2,192.43 2,192.43 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 229462009-6 03-1 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462006-6 03-1 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,595.19 17,595.19 17,595.19 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 229462000-6 03-1 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 348,424.52 348,424.52 348,424.52 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 94669921-6 03-1ACQ11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 94669911-6 03-1ACQA11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669917-6 03-1 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669916-6 03-1 RESB11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669000-6 03-1 SPTAX11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213002-6 03-2 REFU First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,103.56 17,103.56 17,103.56 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213000-6 03-2 SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 246,958.11 246,958.11 246,958.11 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 94686001-6 03-4ADMIN11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 533.67 533.67 533.67 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 94686005-6 034PREP11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 13.66 13.66 13.66 0.150 0.148 0.150 1 94686000-6 034RED11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 150,157.12 150,157.12 150,157.12 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 94686006-6 034RES11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 21,750.85 21,750.85 21,750.85 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213022-6 16-01 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 69,306.31 69,306.31 69,306.31 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213023-6 16-01 CAPINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 276213029-6 16-01 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213028-6 16-01 IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 6,718,996.71 6,718,996.71 6,718,996.71 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213026-6 16-01 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 3,186,385.59 3,186,385.59 3,186,385.59 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213020-6 16-01 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 1,461,119.69 1,461,119.69 1,461,119.69 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 218848001-6 2017A&B INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 1,407.77 1,407.77 1,407.77 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 218848008-6 2017ABPRIORP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,945.80 17,945.80 17,945.80 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2020 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 218848013-2 2017B COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848000-6 2017B DS First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 1,601,595.06 1,601,595.06 1,601,595.06 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 218848002-6 2017B PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 981.71 981.71 981.71 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 218848009-6 2017B_PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 13,113,488.74 13,113,488.74 13,113,488.74 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 233358009-6 233358009-6 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-6 RDA-021NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434161-6 RDA-02PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886000-6 RDA-06AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001-6 RDA06APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-6 RDA06BINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886011-6 RDA06BPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.680 0.671 0.680 1 107886016-6 RDA06BRES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886020-6 RDA071NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886021-6 RDA07PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.930 0.917 0.930 1 107886028-6 RDA07PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886026-6 RDA07RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 136343008-6 RDA10APROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-6 RDA10BPROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343000-6 RDA10INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343001-6 RDA10PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343006-6 RDA10RSRV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161000-6 RDA11AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161001-6 RDA11APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INT1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 146161008-3 RDA11APROJ Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1 146161006-3 RDA11ARSRV Federated Institutional Tax Fr 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669000-5 03-01SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2020 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669902-5 03-1 bond fd Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-5 034 ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94686005-5 034 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686006-5 034 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 276213008-1 03-02 IMP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 13,311,171.50 13,311,171.50 13,311,171.50 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 164742006-1 03-06 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 329,373.79 329,373.79 329,373.79 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 229462007-1 03-1 2012 RE CA Local Agency Investment Fun 808,015.09 808,015.09 808,015.09 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 94669911-1 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 94669921-1 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 744727011-1 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 164741006-1 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,526,313.85 1,526,313.85 1,526,313.85 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 107886026-1 RDA 07 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 229462020-0 03-01 CASH USBANK 444.69 444.69 444.69 0.000 0.000 1 233358050-1 01-2 SPECESC U.S. Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.360 0.355 0.360 1 Subtotal and Average 46,211,952.45 45,633,534.42 45,633,534.42 45,633,534.42 0.684 0.694 1 Retention Escrow Account PACIFIC PREMIER 20190607-882 PACIFIC PREMIER 08/01/2019 94,237.12 94,237.12 94,237.12 0.000 0.000 1 218848050-0 2002 ESCROW USBANK 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848060-0 2006AESCRO USBANK 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848070-0 2006BESCRO USBANK 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848080-0 2007ESCROW USBANK 07/01/2019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462020-2 03-01 ESCROW U.S. Treasury 784,614.48 784,614.48 784,614.48 0.063 0.062 0.063 1 Subtotal and Average 877,993.27 878,851.60 878,851.60 878,851.60 0.055 0.056 1 Letter of Credit 218848006-1 2017B RESER ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL COR 07/01/2019 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 233358006-1 01-2 REFRESI ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2019 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 Subtotal and Average 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2020 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Trust Accounts 6746058700 PARS Pension US Bank Trust 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 6.460 6.372 6.460 1 Subtotal and Average 10,887,848.52 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 6.372 6.460 1 Local Agency Investment Funds SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun 33,483,100.51 33,733,588.09 33,483,100.51 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,873.62 1,887.64 1,873.62 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 30,137,533.44 30,362,992.78 30,137,533.44 1.648 1.625 1.648 1 Subtotal and Average 63,504,785.17 63,622,507.57 64,098,468.51 63,622,507.57 1.625 1.648 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 3133ELFX7 01252 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3130AANA2 01227 Federal Home Loan Bank 3130ABYY6 01235 Federal Home Loan Bank 3130ACN83 01238 Federal Home Loan Bank 3134G8PP8 01220 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 3134GBGZ9 01232 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 3134GBNK4 01234 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 3134GBL42 01237 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 3134GSMF9 01246 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 3134GU6D7 01253 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 3136G3CL7 01218 Federal National Mtg Assn 3136G3TE5 01221 Federal National Mtg Assn 3136G4UL5 01255 Federal National Mtg Assn Subtotal and Average 13 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3133EJT74 01249 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ELMA9 01254 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ELTU8 01256 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3130ADEB4 01240 Federal Home Loan Bank 3130ADSJ2 01244 Federal Home Loan Bank 3130AHF81 01251 Federal Home Loan Bank 3135GOU92 01250 Federal National Mtg Assn Subtotal and Average ,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 12/30/2019 1,000,000.00 1,008,800.00 1,000,000.00 1.650 1.627 1.650 608 12/30/2021 01/30/2017 1,000,000.00 1,003,240.00 1,000,000.00 1.750 1.726 1.750 90 07/30/2020 08/24/2017 1,000,000.00 1,011,390.00 1,000,000.00 1.750 1.726 1.750 299 02/24/2021 10/30/2017 1,000,000.00 1,000,530.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.677 1.700 14 05/15/2020 03/30/2016 1,000,000.00 1,004,470.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.661 1.684 152 09/30/2020 04/27/2017 1,000,000.00 1,029,770.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.964 1.991 636 01/27/2022 05/30/2017 1,000,000.00 1,001,110.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 28 05/29/2020 09/28/2017 1,000,000.00 1,005,140.00 1,000,000.00 1.670 1.647 1.670 150 09/28/2020 05/30/2018 1,000,000.00 1,025,420.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 3.000 1,120 05/26/2023 01/28/2020 1,000,000.00 1,007,330.00 1,000,000.00 1.650 1.627 1.650 1,183 07/28/2023 03/24/2016 1,000,000.00 1,004,590.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.401 1.420 146 09/24/2020 06/29/2016 1,000,000.00 1,001,660.00 1,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 1.250 59 06/29/2020 02/26/2020 1,000,000.00 1,006,960.00 1,000,000.00 1.650 1.627 1.650 1,396 02/26/2024 13,000,000.00 13,110,410.00 13,000,000.00 1.729 1.753 452 11/15/2018 1,000,000.00 1,042,370.00 1,000,000.00 3.050 3.008 3.050 563 11/15/2021 02/07/2020 1,000,000.00 1,030,700.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.401 1.420 1,193 08/07/2023 03/18/2020 1,000,000.00 1,013,820.00 1,000,000.00 0.920 0.907 0.920 1,417 03/18/2024 01/12/2018 1,000,000.00 1,012,210.00 1,000,000.00 2.125 2.096 2.125 256 01/12/2021 03/08/2018 1,000,000.00 1,018,350.00 1,000,000.00 2.460 2.426 2.460 311 03/08/2021 10/25/2019 1,000,000.00 1,020,060.00 1,000,000.00 1.600 1.578 1.600 542 10/25/2021 01/11/2019 1,000,000.00 1,039,840.00 1,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 2.625 620 01/11/2022 7,000,000.00 7,177,350.00 7,000,000.00 2.001 2.029 700 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Total and Average 145,288,931.92 141,741,717.68 142,505,438.62 141,741,717.68 1.729 1.753 77 Page 5 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash April 30, 2020 Page 6 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Passbook/Checking Accounts 1453718479 WORKERS BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC 07/01/2019 13,512.09 13,512.09 13,512.09 0.000 0.000 1 SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2019 3,911.00 3,911.00 3,911.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 10,389,699.39 10,389,699.39 10,389,699.39 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2019 8,709.20 8,709.20 8,709.20 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 Total Cash and Investments 145,288,931.92 O 152,157,549.36 152,921,270.30 152,157,549.36 1.729 1.753 77 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEMECULA Through April 2020 Fund # Fund Name Beginning Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $ 34,238,423.75 $ 6,106,810.39 $ 5,453,601.84 $ 34,891,632.30 002 MEASURE S FUND 8,397,164.03 2,181,062.94 - 10,578,226.97 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 525,596.97 423,999.54 525,596.97 423,999.54 102 RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT 738,486.64 198,574.96 - 937,061.60 103 STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND 2,566,181.99 6,431.99 2,572,613.98 106 JEFFERSON STREET IN LIEU FEES 495,656.25 394,647.01 - 890,303.26 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 3,339,070.25 19,777.74 393,933.10 2,964,914.89 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 362,300.65 1,031.22 120.00 363,211.87 145 TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM 197,090.52 561.95 - 197,652.47 150 AB 2766 FUND 239,494.98 625.78 - 240,120.76 160 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES 17,135.39 16,699.69 17,135.39 16,699.69 161 TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND 26,943.87 76.82 - 27,020.69 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 1,891,640.40 2,409.37 33,003.88 1,861,045.89 170 MEASURE A FUND 6,603,901.22 17,300.25 193,951.48 6,427,249.99 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 1,256,472.45 - 912,025.77 344,446.68 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 23.71 2,244.45 2,268.16 - 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 436,534.55 5,105.44 4,815.40 436,824.59 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT 20,838.16 58.17 - 20,896.33 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 401,758.90 1,146.32 21,150.30 381,754.92 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 407,802.64 1,836.69 65,845.51 343,793.82 198 PUBLIC ART 51,667.82 978.45 - 52,646.27 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 13,597,320.14 7,659,555.97 1,671,011.24 19,585,864.87 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 227,837.03 165.21 228,002.24 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 14,994,792.30 75,150.35 1,614,870.23 13,455,072.42 278 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 6,714,128.27 4,868.44 - 6,718,996.71 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,191,993.23 10,471.50 20,185.79 1,182,278.94 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 1,900,528.68 5,874.19 6,010.73 1,900,392.14 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 1,992,912.79 5,624.55 - 1,998,537.34 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,379,088.92 5,333.60 375,108.69 1,009,313.83 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 1,567,617.12 4,181.17 48,025.77 1,523,772.52 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 53,147.69 42.59 22,875.47 30,314.81 335 CENTRAL SERVICES 345,154.16 932.75 - 346,086.91 340 FACILITIES 654,425.58 3,615.33 91,604.76 566,436.15 350 FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND 198,773.78 393.55 - 199,167.33 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 14,724,743.00 10,677.08 14,735,420.08 381 REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST 140,028.08 1,845.33 141,873.41 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 94,495.41 269.43 - 94,764.84 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 930,769.58 1,280.07 2,219.35 929,830.30 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,998,715.38 5,540.93 2,219.50 2,002,036.81 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 192,257.64 214.33 1,679.64 190,792.33 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,639,896.96 10,230.65 2,353.34 2,647,774.27 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 478,765.46 2,020.73 2,219.50 478,566.69 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,062,940.84 1,239.22 2,487.34 1,061,592.72 478 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 4,750,412.28 5,987.48 2,219.50 4,754,180.26 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 7,317.28 29.50 2,463.11 4,883.67 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 98,386.26 281.13 2,014.70 96,652.69 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 34,671.92 107.90 2,808.91 31,970.91 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 2,772.96 8.45 372.79 2,408.62 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 19,083.09 75.84 2,060.81 17,098.12 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 33,063.75 101.04 1,210.67 31,954.12 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 4,320.06 14.62 840.83 3,493.85 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 82,316.87 261.03 6,718.59 75,859.31 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 28,135.44 80.30 179.63 28,036.11 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 11,067.94 32.42 526.21 10,574.15 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 2,818.25 8.17 120.53 2,705.89 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 93,781.74 281.76 4,222.80 89,840.70 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 21,147.47 65.76 3,117.78 18,095.45 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 7,528.02 22.30 794.30 6,756.02 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 7,455.66 22.06 574.66 6,903.06 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 54,938.84 158.16 1,175.78 53,921.22 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 1,387.91 4.11 120.49 1,271.53 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 43,370.94 134.79 5,546.11 37,959.62 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 96,504.51 277.74 3,243.14 93,539.11 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 196,837.44 595.06 14,412.08 183,020.42 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 2O1,923.33 10,559.26 19,769.56 192,713.03 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 6,647.61 1,999.82 228.65 8,418.78 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 18,787.87 53.62 400.11 18,441.38 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 52,035.29 171.39 23,517.94 28,688.74 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 60,337.14 175.58 2,280.79 58,231.93 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 870.78 2.69 75.99 797.48 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 8,208.10 23.80 637.40 7,594.50 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 445,509.14 1,278.17 35,845.07 410,942.24 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 2,540.70 6.55 112.19 2,435.06 530 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 35,953.56 102.51 - 36,056.07 701 PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND $ 10,863,056.33 743,765.76 - $ 11,606,822.09 Grand Total: $ 146,587,605.66 $ 17,957,594.91 $ 11,623,930.27 $ 152,921,270.30 Journal Entries completed after March's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts / Disbursements columns. Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Approve Third Amendment to Lease Agreement Between City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau DBA Visit Temecula Valley RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between City of Temecula and Visit Temecula Valley (VTV) and authorize the Assistant City Manager to execute the amendment. BACKGROUND: Roughly 30-days into the economic impacts that began as a result of the City, County & State response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, in mid -April the City responded favorably to a request from VTV to defer rent for a three-month period beginning with the April 2020 rent and concluding with the June 2020 rent due to an anticipated decrease in revenues impacting VTV's cash flow. The amendment executed at that time included provisions that monthly rent payment would recommence July 1, 2020 and that both parties agree to negotiate terms of repayment of the deferred rent. At that time no one knew how long and how deeply the local economy would be impacted. As reported during the June 9, 2020 City Council meeting Fiscal Year 2020-21 budget presentation, the City's revenues, including Sales Tax and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) amongst others, have been dramatically impacted. Fortunately for the City, due to the current and former City Councils' leadership, prudent fiscal policies are in place so the City could accumulate reserves to weather this financial storm. VTV has been hit much harder as their fiscal solvency relies solely on tourism revenue streams which include: a hotel based business improvement district assessment (City), a Wine Country Tourism Marketing District (County), and a Memorandum of Understanding with the Pechanga related to the Pechanga Resort and Casino. Each of these have been severely impacted by travel restrictions resulting from the State of California's Stay at Home Order issued in March 2020. Although leisure travel restrictions for many of the businesses in the tourism industry sector were relaxed on Friday June 12, 2020, there is still uncertainty of how long the tourism economy will be affected by the State's executive order to stay at home in response to COVID-19. VTV is projecting a 62% or greater loss in revenue for 2020. Therefore, VTV is requesting their rent and utilities be waived for a twelve (12) month period to assist in their recovery. Like the City they have taken extreme measures to reduce expenses, including furloughing a majority of their staff. A large part of economic recovery for Temecula Valley will be based on the recovery of the local tourism industry. VTV intends to focus/direct their limited resources on marketing Temecula. They have been diligently working on a Recover and Reopening Marketing Plan to help support our travel and leisure partners and the community. There is no question, one of the primary drivers of the recent fiscal expansion of the local tourism economy is the marketing efforts of VTV. Our community has grown to depend on Visit Temecula Valley to expand this key industry sector, their efforts will be a key component of restarting this local economic engine. The City Attorney's office has opined that granting this waiver is permissible as it would be considered an Economic Development incentive geared toward reviving a key industry sector of the local economy. Staff is supportive of this request as the return on this "investment" will pay dividends in the long run with the robust recovery of the City's tourism economy. FISCAL IMPACT: In approving this amendment, the City would forego roughly $95,000 in annual rental revenue, plus roughly $12,000 in annual utility cost recovery. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment 3 to VTV Lease Agreement THIRD AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU DBA VISIT TEMECULA VALLEY This Third Amendment to Office Lease ("Third Amendment") Between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau dba Visit Temecula Valley is made by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City" or "Landlord") and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau, a California non-profit corporation, dba Visit Temecula Valley ("Tenant") and is effective on the date it is fully executed. The City and Tenant may be referred to below collectively as the "Parties". 1. RECITALS. This Third Amendment is made with respect to the following purposes and facts that the Parties acknowledge as true and correct: A. On February 13, 2018, the Parties entered into that certain Office Lease between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau dba Visit Temecula Valley ("Office Lease") regarding the extension of the lease by Tenant of the Premises described in Exhibit "A" to a November 2009 Office Lease between the Parties, and authorizing Tenant to lease the Expansion Premises described in Exhibit "A" to the Office Lease pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Office Lease. B. Recital J of the Office Lease recognized the value of Tenant's operations to the City of Temecula and its residents and the value of having Tenant's offices located adjacent to City Hall within the tourism district of Old Town. C. On February 13, 2019, the Parties entered into that certain First Amendment to the Office Lease between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau dba Visit Temecula Valley ("First Amendment") to amend Section 4.B. of the Office Lease to provide for up to $250,000.00 in reimbursement for the Tenant Improvements and to modify the Monthly Rent set forth at Section 5.A.1) of the Office Lease and the Security Deposit set forth in Section 5.C. of the Office Lease in consideration of the $50,000.00 increase in reimbursement for the Tenant Improvements. D. On May 5, 2020, the Parties entered into that certain Second Amendment to Office Lease between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau dba Visit Temecula Valley ("Second Amendment"). Section 5.A.1) of the Office Lease provides for the payment of monthly rent set forth therein by Tenant on or before the first business day of each calendar month. The state of emergency declared by federal, state, and local governments in response to the public health impact of the novel coronavirus ("COVID-19") and closures of non -essential businesses impacted the tourism industry. The Second Amendment amended Section 5.A. of the Office Lease to add a new Section 5.A.2) to provide for the deferment of the monthly rent for a three-month period to assist Tenant during the COVID-19 public health crisis and to provide for the negotiation of the deferred rent. E. COVID-19 has greatly impacted the national, state, and local economies. COVID-19 public health concerns, State of California's Stay -at -Home Order issued in March 2020, and travel restrictions have impacted the tourism industry and tourism revenue streams on which Tenant relies, including a hotel -based business improvement district assessment (City), a Wine Country Tourism Marketing District (County), and a Memorandum of Understanding with the Pechanga related to the Pechanga Resort and Casino. There is uncertainty regarding how long the tourism sector will be affected by COVID-19. Tenant is projecting a loss in revenue of 62% or greater for 2020. Based on this, Tenant has requested from City a waiver of rent and waiver of payment of any utilities that are contracted for by City for a twelve-month period -1- 11086-0111\2408821v2.doc commencing on April 1, 2020 to assist in Tenant's recovery. Tenant will focus its efforts and direct its limited resources on marketing the Temecula area, including working on a Recover and Reopening Marketing Plan to help support the travel and leisure partners and the community. Tenant's marketing efforts fosters local tourism and will help in the local economic recovery. The waiver in rent and waiver of payment of utilities contracted for by City represents an economic development incentive aimed at reviving this key industry sector of the local economy. Accordingly, the City and Tenant wish to enter into this Third Amendment to (1) Amend Section 5.A.2) to the Office Lease to provide for a twelve-month waiver of rent and (2) Amend Section 12 by adding a new Section 12.A. to provide for a waiver of payment of utilities contracted for by City for a twelve-month period. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions of this Third Amendment, the City and Tenant agree to amend Sections 5.A.2) and Section 12. of the Office Lease, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below. 2. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 5.A.2) OF OFFICE LEASE. The City and Tenant agree to amend and replace 5.A.2), which was added as part of the Second Amendment, so that Section 5.A.2) reads as follows: 5. RENT; ADJUSTMENTS; SECURITY DEPOSIT. A. Monthly Rent. 2) Based on the national, state, and local emergencies declared in connection with the COVID-19 public health crisis and resulting impacts to the economy and tourism industry, the Parties agree that the monthly rent specified in Section 5.A.1) shall be waived for a period of twelve months, commencing with the rent due on April 1, 2020 ("Waived Rent"). Accordingly, based on the Waived Rent, the next monthly rent in accordance with Section 5.A.1) shall be due on April 1, 2021. 3. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 12 OF OFFICE LEASE. The City and Tenant agree to amend Section 12 of the Office Lease titled "UTILITIES; HVAC" by adding a new Section 12.A. to read as follows: 12. UTILITIES; HVAC. City will provide and pay for water and trash pick-up. Tenant will obtain and pay for all other utilities, including gas, electricity, internet service, and phone service. Tenant will pay Tenant's reasonable prorated share of utilities contracted for by City (including electricity and gas), as determined by City, on a monthly basis within ten days after City gives written notice to Tenant of the amount due. A. Waiver of Payment of City -Contracted Utilities. In accordance with the Waived Rent provision of Section 5.A.2), City waives Tenant's obligation to pay Tenant's reasonable prorated share of utilities contracted for by City, including electricity and gas ("City - contracted utilities") under Section 12 of the Office Lease for a twelve-month period, commencing April 1, 2020 and ending March 30, 2021. Tenant's obligation to pay the City -contracted utilities pursuant to Section 12 of the Office Lease will resume on April 1, 2021. This Section 12.A. has no impact on Tenant's obligation to pay any utilities not contracted for by the City, including phone and internet service. 4. NO OTHER CHANGES. Except for the changes specifically set forth in this Third Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Office Lease, as amended by the First Amendment and Second Amendment, will remain in full force and effect. -2- 11086-0111\2408821v2.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Third Amendment as of the date set forth below: City/Landlord: CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation Dated: 12020 By: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk Tenant- TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU, a California nonprofit corporation, dba Visit Temecula Valley Dated: 0 Print Name: Title: Dated: By: Print Name: Title: , 2020 2020 -3- 11086-0111\2408821v2.doc Item No. 5 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 9, 2020 CALL TO ORDER at 8:37 PM: President Schwank ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 8. Approve Action Minutes of May 26, 2020 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of May 26, 2020. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 8:40 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 23, 2020, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Receive Update on Proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program in Old Town RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive an update on the proposed temporary expanded dining/retail program in Old Town and provide general direction to staff. BACKGROUND: At the June 9, 2020 City Council meeting the Council heard a presentation, considered and ultimately approved a plan to temporarily close certain streets in Old Town to allow for expanded dining and retail -shopping opportunities in an effort to offset the limitations brought about by social distancing guidelines. The initial concept for the proposed program was generally supported when introduced at a meeting of Old Town business owners prior to the County and State allowing these businesses to reopen. Once allowed to open, these business owners focused their attention on getting open and preparing to safely have patrons return to their places of business. Now that they have been open for a few weeks, it seems interest in this program has fallen, with more and more Old Town merchants preferring vehicle traffic along the streets over a pedestrian paseo that could be used to expand outdoor dining and outdoor shopping opportunities. Staff will provide an update on the various comments and sentiment that Old Town Merchants shared at meetings they attended related to this subject. Staff is looking for general direction from the City Council on whether to proceed with the program. FISCAL IMPACT: If the program moves forward, existing funds would be adequate to implement and facilitate the needed City support costs. Participant program expenses could be offset by increased retail sales that would otherwise be absent under the current COVID-19 circumstances. If the program does not move forward, there would be no additional expense. ATTACHMENTS: June 9, 2020 Agenda Report Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: June 9, 2020 SUBJECT: Provide General Direction to Staff on a Proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program in Old Town PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide general direction to staff on whether to proceed with a proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program in Old Town. BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented burden on local restaurants and retail establishments. Over the past few months, many restaurants located within the City of Temecula have been operating with limited service (to -go) or no service at all. A significant portion of retail establishments were limited/closed. Under the current public health orders, social distancing, reduced occupancy, and other operational restrictions are limiting the ability of restaurants and retail establishments to service customers as they are allowed to reopen/expand operations. Analysis from the National Restaurant Association and National Retail Federation indicates the following: • Restaurant sales have fallen to the lowest level in 35 yearsl • Three decades of restaurant jobs were lost in the last two months • Retail sales have dropped 16.4% in April (nationwide)' Even amongst these challenging circumstances, the National Restaurant Association's analysis shows that there is strong consumer demand for restaurants. As the State of California, and Riverside County Public Health loosen restrictions, the City Council has directed staff to implement multiple programs (Temecula Revive) that accelerate local economic activity while maintaining compliance with all State or County mandates. Staff has developed the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program to assist businesses during these challenging times. The Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program consists of two different avenues for businesses to temporarily expand their businesses. 1 https://www.restaurant.orWresearch 2 https://www.restaurant.orWresearch s https://nrfcom/media-center/press-releases/april-retail-sales-drop-nearly-twice-much-march-during-coronavirus 1. Temporary expansions on private property 2. Temporary expansions within the public right-of-way in Old Town Temecula Temporary Expansions on Private Property Temporary expansions on private property would consist of businesses temporarily expanding their footprint in outdoor areas such as adjacent private parking spaces, private courtyards, or underutilized private sidewalk/frontage areas. Under the proposed program, applicants would submit a no fee Temporary Use Permit with a next -day turnaround. The Temporary Use Permit would ensure that all safety/legal requirements are met. Safety/legal requirements include maintaining fire access, temporary barriers in parking spaces to protect customers from vehicles, Americans with Disability Act compliance, and property owner approval. This program would serve a wide range of restaurant and retail establishments throughout the City but would not provide adequate relief to restaurants and retail establishments within Old Town Temecula, due to the urban nature of the district. Temporary Expansions within the Public Right -of -Way in Old Town Temecula The unique urban nature of Old Town Temecula requires a different solution than other areas of the City. Consequently, staff has developed a Temporary Expansion Dining/Retail program within the public right-of-way for Old Town Temecula. The proposed expansions in Old Town would allow restaurants/retail to utilize temporary street closures and sidewalks within the public right- of-way to temporarily expand the footprint of businesses. Under the current proposal, Old Town Front Street, Fifth Street, and Fourth Street would be temporally closed to vehicular traffic. Applicants for the program would submit a Special Event Permit at no cost, with a next day turnaround. The Special Event Permit would include a licensing agreement that would allow the program to be stopped at the City's discretion. Staff is working with various internal and external partners to address prospective issues, take appropriate public safety precautions, and help support our businesses within the Old Town area. On Friday, May 29, 2020, the City Council Old Town Steering Subcommittee (Naggar/Schwank) received a presentation from staff regarding the proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program. At the conclusion of that meeting the City Council subcommittee directed staff to bring the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail proposal to the City Council on June 9, 2020. Staff received fourteen public comments regarding the proposed program. All comments were supportive of the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program. Staff is looking for general direction from the City Council on whether to proceed with the program. CEQA The proposed Program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act because it can be with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption and implementation of the proposed program may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Program only provides for temporary uses of already developed urban space. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. The uses authorized by the proposed program are minor public or private alterations in the condition of land which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees. Therefore, the proposed program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15304(e) of the California Code of Regulations. FISCAL IMPACT: Existing funds would be adequate to implement and facilitate the program. Program expenses could be offset by increased retail sales that would otherwise be absent under the current COVID-19 circumstances. ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Consider the Vacancy on the City Council and Provide Direction Regarding the Same PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the vacancy resulting from the resignation of James Stewart and provide direction on whether to fill the vacancy by Council appointment or election. BACKGROUND: On June 4, 2020, former Mayor and City Council Member James Stewart tendered his resignation effective immediately from the City Council. Government Code Section 36512 states that within 60 days of its occurrence, the City Council must fill the vacancy by appointment or call for a special election. A general election option is also discussed below. The sixty-day deadline is August 3, 2020. While the vacated position is currently at -large, it is scheduled to transition to District 2 with the November 2020 election. Option 1: Appointment Government Code Section 36512(b) requires that if a vacancy is filled by appointment, the actual appointment be made within 60 days (in this case August 3, 2020). When the full Council is engaged in the appointment process, the Brown Act is applicable and public noticing and access requirements must be met. While the law does not dictate the specific process by which the appointment must be made, there are several industry best practices to follow. It is anticipated that the process would be similar to that which was utilized in filling the vacancy left by now Supervisor Chuck Washington in 2015. The best practices are as follows: Candidate Pool — To ensure the process is open and available to all residents as this is a citywide seat currently, the appointment would be available to all residents of the City of the Temecula, over the age of 18, continuously registered for at least 30 days prior to the date of appointment. Advertising and Outreach — To ensure consistency with our existing efforts for board and commission recruitments, the same advertising and outreach would be conducted for this appointment. Current advertising efforts include printed newspaper, website publication, physical postings and social media usage. Application — The application for appointment would be similar to that which was utilized in 2015 and include information related to contacts, education, employment, public service, open-ended questions, and the ability to include supplemental information. Presentation / Interview — The presentation/interview would be at a special and/or regularly scheduled council meeting. The Council would conduct 10-minute rounds for each applicant consisting of a 5-minute presentation to be followed by a 5-minute question/answer period. The question/answer period provides the Council with an opportunity to obtain additional information related to the application packet or the presentation. Applicants present in alphabetical order based on last name. Depending upon the number of applications, times and days could be adjusted. The presentation/interview, as well as City Council deliberation, must be publicly noticed and accessible pursuant to the Brown Act. Timing and Term for Appointment - If the appointment option is selected, the new Council Member must be seated on or before the August 3, 2020 deadline pursuant to the Government Code. If the new Council Member is seated at the July 28, 2020 City Council meeting, the regularly scheduled meeting prior to the deadline, he or she will continue to serve until December 8, 2020, approximately four months from the date of taking office. Costs for Appointment - The approximate cost associated with filling the vacancy by appointment is $500 or less and will cover advertising, supplies and materials. Timeline for Appointment - The general timeline associated with the appointment option to fill the vacancy is as follows: • June 23, 2020 — Direct Staff to Pursue Appointment Option • June 25, 2020 — Advertise/Publish/Post Vacancy by Appointment • June 25, 2020 — July 10, 2020 - Open Application Period for Vacancy • July 10, 2020 — Deadline to Submit Application for Appointment • July 14, 2020 — Special City Council Meeting to Conduct Presentations/Interviews and Deliberate on Selection of Appointee • July 28, 2020 — Seat New City Council Member at 2nd Meeting in July Option 2: Election (No Action Required) Government Code Section 36512(b) states that a special election to fill a vacancy shall be held on the next regularly established election date not less than 114 days from the call of the special election. The 114-day date is October 15, 2020. Established election dates set forth in Election Code Section 1000 are March, April, June and November. As such, the next available date for a special election is November 3, 2020. However, a general election has already been called for this date. On June 9, 2020, the City Council approved resolutions calling for the general municipal election for Districts 2 and 4 to be held on November 3, 2020. The nomination period for the general election is July 13, 2020 — August 7, 2020, notwithstanding a five-day extension if an incumbent does not file. The term of office under a general municipal election would be a full term through 2024, versus a shortened term under an appointment or special election. A general municipal election would cost approximately $3.50 per registered voter, the cost of which is accounted for in the existing budget. Based on the above, it is recommended that the City Council consider the vacancy and provide direction regarding whether it wishes to fill the position through an appointment or election. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the consideration of this item. Specific fiscal impacts associated with each option are discussed above. ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Consider the Vacancy for the Position of Mayor and Provide Direction Regarding the Same PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the vacancy of the position of Mayor and provide direction regarding the same. BACKGROUND: On June 4, 2020, former Mayor and City Council Member James Stewart tendered his resignation effective immediately from the City Council rendering the position of Mayor vacant. The City does not have a formal or written policy addressing vacancies in the position of Mayor and/or Mayor Pro Tempore. Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.04.070, which addresses addresses presiding officers, states as follows: A. City council shall meet on the Tuesday after the general municipal election and choose one of its members as mayor and one of its members as mayor pro tempore. B. The mayor, and the mayor pro tempore, shall serve a term of one year, or until a successor for each position is chosen. Three affirmative votes shall be required to choose or change the mayor or mayor pro tempore. C. In addition to the powers and duties of a council member, the mayor, or in the mayor's absence, the mayor pro tempore, shall be the presiding officer of the city council. Option 1: Appoint the Mayor Pro Tempore as Mayor, Select New Mayor Pro Tempore While there is no set requirement, traditionally the Mayor Pro Tempore has rotated into the position of Mayor. If the Council wishes to appoint the Mayor Pro Tempore as Mayor, the position of Mayor Pro Tempore would become vacant and the Council would need to appoint a new Mayor Pro Tempore. The terms for both positions would be through 2020. Option 2: Appoint Another Council Member as Mayor Since there is no set requirement, another Council Member may be appointed as Mayor. If the Council wishes to appoint another Council Member as Mayor, the newly appointed Mayor would serve through 2020. The Mayor Pro Tempore would also continue to serve in the existing capacity for the remainder of 2020. Option 3: Leave Position of Mayor Vacant, No Action Required Since there is no set requirement, the position of Mayor may also be kept vacant for the remainder of 2020. A new Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore would be selected when a full Council is seated. If this option is selected, the Mayor Pro Tempore would continue to serve in the existing capacity for the remainder of 2020. It is therefore recommended that the City Council consider the vacancy in the position of Mayor and provide general direction regarding the same. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 10 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to 2020 City Council Committees PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint members to serve on existing City Council Committees for the balance of calendar year 2020 and evaluate the need for an additional committee. BACKGROUND: The City Council annually appoints members of its legislative body to serve as liaisons to City commissions, external organizations, standing committees and ad hoc subcommittees. Each year the City Council Committee Assignments List is reviewed and revised for the upcoming calendar year. The Council Members appointed serve a calendar year (January 1 — December 31). For appointments to external organizations that include a stipend, Form 806 is completed and posted pursuant to the regulation requirements of the Fair Political Practices Commission. On January 14, 2020, the City Council appointed members of its legislative body to serve as the primary and alternate appointees to a variety of committees. On June 4, 2020, former Mayor and Council Member James Stewart tendered his resignation from the City Council, thereby vacating his appointments to various committees. In addition, on June 9, 2020, the City Council individually provided comments under the Council Comments portion of the agenda regarding the peaceful protests and racial equity conversations that are taking place in the community. Through those comments, the City Council expressed a desire for additional work and effort to be undertaken with respect to this important subject matter. It is therefore recommended that the City Council not only review the committee list to make appointments to the vacated positions resulting from the resignation, but also provide direction on whether a new subcommittee is desired to work with staff in the racial equity and community engagement space. If the consensus is that all Council Members would like to equally participate in this space without a subcommittee, staff will proceed with the development of a comprehensive agenda item for the first meeting of July. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: City Council Committee Assignments List 2020 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS Commission Liaison One Member Current Member Community Services Commission Schwank Old Town Local Review Board Schwank Planning Commission Naggar Public/Traffic Safety Commission Stewart Standing Committees (Two Members) Current Members Arts and Cultural Affairs Subcommittee Edwards, Schwank City Sustainability Program Subcommittee Rahn, Stewart E-Government and Temecula Outreach Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Economic Development Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Old Town Steering Subcommittee Naggar, Schwank Finance Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Infrastructure Beautification Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Joint City Council/TVUSD Subcommittee Rahn, Schwank Military Subcommittee Rahn, Schwank Move 1-15 Through Temecula Valley Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn Murrieta/Temecula Subcommittee Edwards, Naggar Parks, Recreation and Community Services Subcommittee Schwank, Stewart Public Works Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Southwest Cities Coalition Subcommittee Edwards, Schwank Representative Assignments (External Organizations - Stipend Not Included) Current Member(s) Animal Shelter Liaison/JPA Representative Stewart League of California Cities — Voting Delegate Rahn, (Alternate Stewart) National League of Cities — Voting Delegate Rahn, Alternate Stewart Pechan a Tribal Council Representative Naggar Rancho California Water District Liaison Stewart, (Alternate Schwank) Southwest Riverside County Energy Authority (SRCEA) JPA Edwards, Schwank Temecula Sister City Liaison Stewart Representative Assignments External Organizations — May Include Stipend Current Member(s) RCA Representative Edwards, (Alternate Stewart) Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Board Stewart, (Alternate Edwards) Riverside County Transportation Commission Naggar, Alternate Edwards Riverside Transit Agency Representative Schwank, Alternate Edwards WRCOG Executive Committee and Zone Committee Stewart, (Alternate Schwank) Ad Hoc Committees Two Members Current Members Altair Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn French Valley Parkway Interchange Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn General Plan Update Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Rahn Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn Human Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Rahn Margarita Recreation Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Schwank Murrieta Creek Project Ad Hoc Subcommittee Rahn, Schwank Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Schwank Promenade in Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Schwank Public Safety Ad Hoc Subcommittee Rahn, Stewart Roripaugh Ranch (aka Sommers Bend) Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Service Level Assessments Ad Hoc Subcommittee Rahn, Schwank Short Term Vacation Rentals Ad Hoc Subcommittee Rahn, Stewart Strategic Fiscal Planning Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Stewart Supportive Housing/Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn Trails / Open Space Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Schwank TVE2 (Small Business Incubator) Ad Hoc Subcommittee Rahn, Stewart Uptown Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Naggar Winchester Hills Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Rahn Ad Hoc Subcommittees are formed for a specific limited purpose and operate for a limited time until its purposes are fulfilled ("ad hoc") as opposed to "standing committees" that have continuing subject matter jurisdiction. The descriptions of the purposes and duration of the ad hoc subcommittees are as follows: Altair Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide staff direction on development options for the property located west of Pujol below the western escarpment. Development on this property would include the construction of the Western By -Pass Corridor and has potential for an "in town" residential neighborhood adjacent to Old Town. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the development and disposition of the property. Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee reviews funding applications from various non-profit organizations requesting Community Service funding for the year. This subcommittee will meet in September/October 2020 and will make specific recommendations to the City Council for fiscal year 2020-2021 Community Service funding. Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee is responsible for evaluating and negotiating terms and conditions associated with the disposition and development of the Agency owned property located at the North West Corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the development or disposition of the property. French Valley Parkway Interchange Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee shall work with representatives from Caltrans, Federal Highways, and elected officials at the city, state, and federal levels. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the construction of the interchange project. General Plan Update Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide direction and recommendations relating to the General Plan update project, which will kick-off with updating several supporting components including the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), Housing Element, Circulation Element. The term of this subcommittee is through the adoption of a comprehensive General Plan Update. Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee is responsible for attracting and facilitating the development of a higher education facility and programs in the City of Temecula, including the new higher education complex acquired by MSJC and expansion of CSUSM in the City. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by December 2020. Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will monitor and provide feedback on the implementation of the development plan for the existing Temecula Valley Hospital. It is anticipated that this subcommittee will need to continue through the implementation of the development plan. Human Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will evaluate services and programs related to special needs, homelessness, senior citizens and mental health awareness to identify non-profit stakeholders to enhance and coordinate delivery of these services. This subcommittee will also review funding associated with these programs and services for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 and report back on its recommendations to the City Council by December 2020. Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee — While this subcommittee will not be negotiating individual infill projects, the subcommittee will be working closely with staff to identify and consider potential infill sites in 2020, ensuring consistency with the City's General and Growth Management Plans and zoning designations. Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee is responsible for the attraction of luxury car dealerships to the City. Auto sales represent a large percentage of sales tax revenue to the City and the expansion and attraction of dealerships will preserve a revenue stream to maintain City services. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by December 2020. Margarita Recreation Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will work with staff to explore concepts for an intergenerational recreation and human services facility and provide input based upon community workshops and needs assessments during the design process. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the renovations at the Margarita Recreation Center. Murrieta Creek Project Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide direction and recommendations that involve the Army Corps of Engineers Project that improves Murrieta Creek to provide added flood protection. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the Murrieta Creek Improvement Project. Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee is responsible for evaluating and negotiating terms and conditions associated with the disposition and development of the Agency owned property located adjacent to the Town Square along Main Street in Old Town. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the adjacent properties. Promenade in Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee would provide direction and review of any potential development applications associated with the City's regional mall in 2020. This subcommittee will meet on an as -needed basis and will report back to the City Council with appropriate recommendations by December 2020. Public Safety Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will work with staff to monitor the County's efforts to implement the KPMG law enforcement efficiency review, and evaluate and discuss the City's own public safety operations, efficiencies, and other items related to the joint powers authority conversation. This subcommittee will also provide direction on efforts to construct a public safety memorial as referenced in the existing CIP. The term of this subcommittee will be through the completion of the County's implementation of the review and completion of the construction of the public safety memorial. Roripaugh Ranch (aka Sommers Bend) Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will monitor and report on the issues affecting the Community Facility District Bonds, and development issues affecting the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the development now known as Sommers Bend. The term of this subcommittee is through the build out of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Service Level Assessments Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide staff direction regarding landscape maintenance zones throughout the City, proposal(s) for new assessments, public outreach and recommendations to the full City Council. The term of this subcommittee will be through the completion of the Proposition 218 process through December 2020. Short Term Vacation Rentals Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide staff direction on the development of regulations pertaining to the use and operation of short-term vacation rental businesses. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the adoption of a related ordinance. Strategic Fiscal Planning Ad Hoc Subcommittee —This subcommittee will provide direction regarding fiscal policies and strategies related to new revenue streams and a new User Fee Study. The term of this subcommittee is through 2020. Supportive Housing/Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will work with staff to identify and implement solutions to provide both housing and supportive services for families and individuals who meet the criteria of Extremely Low, Very Low and Low Income by evaluating affordable housing development opportunities utilizing remaining affordable housing bond proceeds. The subcommittee will make recommendations regarding the selected developments responding to the Request for Proposals for Affordable Housing issued in 2017. The term of this subcommittee is through the expenditure of the available Affordable Housing bond proceeds. Trails and Open Space Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide direction and input on the efforts underway to enhance existing trails, complete trail connections, as well as consider additional possible trail ways for multi -purpose uses including equestrian, pedestrian, and cycling. This subcommittee also provides staff direction on potential annexations of areas within the City's Sphere of Influence and potential purchase of permanent open space property similar to property purchased along the escarpment west of the City limit which was purchased by the City and deeded to the RCA. It is anticipated that this subcommittee will need to continue through 2020. TVE2 (Small Business Incubator) Ad Hoc Subcommittee —This subcommittee will evaluate policies and procedures related to incubator use and application selection. This subcommittee will also review applications from developing entrepreneurs for incubator use and selection in 2019 and make related recommendations to the City Council by December 2020. Uptown Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee — City Council has given staff direction to analyze the redevelopment of Uptown Temecula, the City's first commercial district. This subcommittee will provide staff with direction as we analyze the potential for an urbanized extension of Old Town including increased commercial and corporate office opportunities as well as mixed use residential development and the initial implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and the In -Lieu Road Fee. The term of this subcommittee is through the implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will work with staff to make recommendations regarding community members who have made significant contributions to the City of Temecula in 2020. This subcommittee is needed on an ongoing basis to potentially recognize outstanding citizens. Winchester Hills Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This Subcommittee will work with staff and the property owner, to provide direction on potential land use proposals for this approximately 100-acre vacant property at the intersection of Date/Ynez Streets. The site will be bisected by the proposed French Valley Interchange project. The site is currently zoned for Service Commercial land uses. The property owner has indicated a desire to consider mixed -use development on the site which would necessitate an amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan and the Winchester Hills Development Agreement. The term of this subcommittee is through the disposition of the property. Item No. 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report for May 2020. VIRTUAL TRANSITION The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the virtual shift of many functions of the City, and Community Development in particular. Community Development, in collaboration with Business License, Fire, Land Development, Police, and IT, shifted all Permit Center services online in under one week. Building and Safety has begun implementation of virtual inspections utilizing FaceTime. While keeping the health and safety of staff and the community as the top priority, the division has been able to increase the volume of inspections conducted, and keep projects moving with this new process. Community Development was able to resume public hearings and meetings beginning in April by shifting to virtual meetings, conducted via Zoom webinars. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES Planning processed 40 new applications and conducted seven (7) Public Hearings in May. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report. Plan Type May 2020 Conditional Use Permit 2 Extension of Time 2 Home Occupations 15 Maps 3 Modifications 10 Pre-Applicatian 1 Assessary Dwelling Unit 2 Temporary Use Permit 1 Zoning or Planning Letter 3 Total 40 Woodspring Suites (PA20-0072): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 60,600 square foot, four-story, 130 room Woodspring Suites Hotel located on the west side of Madison Avenue between Buecking Drive and McCabe Court. (COOPER) Winchester Hills Specific Plan Amendment (PAs18-0660 and 18-0661): The City is processing a Specific Plan Amendment to the Winchester Hills Specific Plan for a Residential Overlay within portions of Planning Area 12, allowing up to 1,000 residential units; and a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations for Planning Area 12 to Specific Plan Implementation (SPI). The project is located on the corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. (COOPER) Heirloom Farms (PAs 18-0659, 18-0660, 18-0661): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of 321-unit single-family community on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes, attached townhomes, and duplexes. Community meetings were held on June 19, 2018 and February 20, 2020, and further outreach will take place prior to a public hearing. The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. The project is located on the corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. (COOPER) Arrive @ Rancho Highlands (PA19-1448): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 270- unit multi -family community adjacent to the Temecula Duck Pond, southeast of Rancho California Road on Ynez Road. The project includes leasing offices, clubhouse, fitness center, pool, tot lot, and dog park. The project is located within the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The project proposes 20% of the units (55 units) as affordable at or below 60% average median income. (COOPER) Solana Assisted Living (PAs19-0940 and 19-0941): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an approximately 91,002 square foot, two story, 107 unit assisted living and memory care facility located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and Solana Way. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project by a consultant and the public review and commenting period is from May 27, 2020 to June 27, 2020. (COOPER) Lantern Crest Temecula (PA19-1452, PA20-0530): The City is processing a Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA17-0328) for an approximately 526,762 square foot, four- story, 494 unit, independent and assisted living community; and a Minor Exception for a 4'-9" increase in allowable building height for architectural elements. The project is located at the southeast corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. The project site was previously approved as the WESTliving Assisted Living Facility in the Winchester Hills Specific Plan. This project is scheduled for Planning Commission on June 17, 2020. (COOPER) Sommers Bend Home Product Review (PAs 20-0328, 20-0329, and 20-0330): The City is processing the second phase of a single-family residential home product review for Sommers Bend. This phase is all age -qualified homes encompasses three villages located in PAs 22, 23A, and 24, for a total of 192 units. All three are scheduled for Planning Commission on July 15, 2020. (COOPER) Sommers Bend Age Qualified Private Recreation Center (PA20-0278): The City is processing a Development Plan for the Sommers Bend age qualified private recreation center consisting of an approximately 11,159 square foot clubhouse building (including a fitness center, multi -purpose room, and kitchen), pool, spa, pickleball courts, bocce ball, group BBQ, yoga lawn, cabanas, and 45 parking spaces located within PA23B at Sommers Bend. This project is scheduled for Planning Commission on July 15, 2020. (COOPER) Roripaugh Ranch - Wingsweep Tract Maps (PAs 20-0567, 20-0568, 20-0569): The City is processing three Tentative Tract Maps (TTM) for the remaining three non -entitled residential planning areas of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: TTM 37925 (PA10) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin; TTM 37928 (PA33A) for the creation of 15 single family lots, 5 open space lots, and a water quality basin; TTM 37928 (PA33A) for the creation of 15 single family lots, 5 open space lots, and a water quality basin. (COOPER) MS Mountain View Industrial Buildings (PAs 20-0533, 20-0534, 20-0535, and 20-0536): The City is processing four (4) separate industrial buildings located on individual lots along Avenida Alvarado. The square footage of each individual building is 15,641 square feet, 14,544 square feet, 15,944 square feet, and 11,824 square feet. (COOPER) LONG RANGE PLANNING Temporary Expanded Outdoor Dining and Retail in Old Town: As the State of California, and Riverside County Public Health loosen restrictions related to the COVID 19 pandemic, City Council has directed staff to implement multiple programs (Temecula Revive) that accelerate local economic activity while maintaining compliance with all State or County mandates. Staff has developed the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program to assist businesses during these challenging times. On Friday, May 29, 2020, the City Council Old Town Steering Subcommittee (Naggar/Schwank) received a presentation from staff regarding the proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program. At the conclusion of that meeting, the City Council Subcommittee directed staff to bring the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail proposal to the City Council on June 9, 2020. Staff received fourteen public comments regarding the proposed program. All comments were supportive of the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (LR20-0209): Staff prepared an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to allow for four-story hotels in the Downtown Core District. Previously, outside of the Hotel Overlay District, the Specific Plan only allowed four-story buildings in the Downtown Core District when at least one floor is residential or when one floor is office and parking is provided for that floor. Staff worked with Ascent Environmental to prepare an EIR Addendum for the project and presented the Specific Plan Amendment to the Planning Commission on May 6, 2020, and the City Council approved the Specific Plan Amendment on May 26, 2020. (FISK) CEQA Traffic Impact Analysis - VMT Thresholds and Guidelines (LR18-1506): The City has been selected by Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG), through the Sustainable Communities Program, to update the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to facilitate compliance with SB 743 Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT). The City's TIA Guidelines provide a methodology for assessing potential traffic and circulation impacts of proposed projects. The Guidelines use Level of Service (LOS) based on intersection delay to analyze impacts to intersections and roadway segments. The City will transition the Guidelines from LOS based to VMT based before the state deadline of July 1, 2020. Staff is working with Fehr & Peers to update the Guidelines to include VMT methodology, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures. On January 28 and April 23, 2020, Staff met with the General Plan Update Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tern Edwards and Council Member Rahn. The Planning Commission approved the Guidelines on April 22. On April 23, the project was presented to the Public Traffic Safety Commission. On May 26, 2020, the City Council of the City of Temecula voted 5-0 to approve the CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines. (TOMA) Old Town Parking Study (LR17-1502): Staff is working with Fehr & Peers to update the 2010 Old Town Parking Management Plan. The Plan will take a detailed look at existing parking policies, standards, supply and demand within the study area, as well as the effect that planned future development and recently approved projects will have on future demand. The study will also identify strategies and standards for management of the parking supply. Per direction provided by the City Council Old Town Subcommittee, consisting of Council Members Naggar and Schwank, staff presented the study findings to the Old Town Local Review Board on October 14, 2019. On December 10, 2019, staff provided an update to the Subcommittee. Staff has presented the findings to the Public Traffic/Safety Commission and Community Services Commission. Staff will present the findings to the Planning Commission Old Town Subcommittee and the full Planning Commission. (JONES) Objective Design and Development Standards (LR18-1684): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Objective Design and Development Standards for multi -family and mixed -use residential developments, with the goal of expediting housing production, streamlining approval processes, and establishing the foundation for future regulations and housing laws. Staff is working on creating Objective Design Standards that will conform with SB 35, as well as to incorporate objective design guidelines into the City's Development Code. (TOMA, RABIDOU) Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Park Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan. The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. The goals are to identify existing trails and implement a strategy to fill in the missing links. (PETERS) HOUSING Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City has received a formal Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. Entitlements are expected to be completed in June 2020, and CHW will apply for funding through the State of California in July. (LEHNER, RABIDOU, WATSON) Mission Village Rehabilitation: The City partnered with Affirmed Housing for modifications to their regulatory agreements on the existing Mission Village Affordable Housing Complex. This will result in the complete rehabilitation of the complex and secure affordable covenants for an additional 55 years. The modifications to the agreement were approved by City Council on August 13, 2019. The County Oversight Board approved the modifications on September 5, 2019, and the State Department of Finance approved the project on October 18, 2019. The construction loan for the rehabilitation project closed on March 14th. As part of the negotiations, the City received an additional $1.3 million to use towards the development of affordable housing. Construction for the rehabilitation will begin in 2020. (LEHNER, WATSON) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. Temecula Pacific Associates is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior to the commencement of construction. (LEHNER, WATSON) Housing Element Update (LR18-1620 and LR17-1757): The City is working with De Novo Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA process, community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tern Edwards and Council Member Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Youmans, will serve as advisory bodies during the process. (WEST, TOMA, PETERS) Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) (LR17-1757): Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029. On May 7, 2020, the SCAG Regional Council delayed adoption of the Connect SoCal for up to 120 days. After the adoption of Connect SoCal, each local jurisdiction will receive formal notification from SCAG on their draft RHNA allocation. The Final RHNA Allocation is anticipated in October 2020. (WEST) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) Temecula Assist: On Thursday, May 21, 2020, during the City Council Budget Workshop, the Temecula City Council gave the greenlight to a half million dollars in aid for Temecula small businesses. The program, branded as "Temecula Assist," is a set of two small business emergency relief grants designated for Temecula business owners coping with the financial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Temecula Assist is comprised of two grants: Rent Recovery and Job Retention Grant (funded through CDBG-CV) and a Business Improvement Grant (funded through the General Fund). The application period is May 26 through June 9. The Substantial Amendment to the 2019- 20 CDBG Annual Action Plan will be heard at a public hearing at City Council on June 9, 2020. The grant program is expected to assist 67 local businesses. (LEHNER) CDBG Administration: The 2020-21 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for CDBG funding was released in November 2019. Two technical workshops were held for applicants on December 12, 2019. The Finance Committee provided recommendations for the 2020-21 program on March 10, 2020. City Council approved the following recommendations on April 28, 2020. (LEHNER) Organization Project Name Finance Program Description Committee 0 [11 Recommendation] Assistance League of Temecula Valley Operation School Bell Clothing & supplies for low$5,491 income students in TVUSD Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County Before and After School Care Round trip school transportation; $5,491 activities before and after school Canine Support Teams, I nc. Service Dogs for Disabled Provide service and assistance $5,491 Persons dogs to people with disabilities. Homeless Prevention and Connecting homeless individuals City of Temecula with services and financial $20,000 Diversion Program assistance Community Mission of Hope Housing Resource Center Provide case management for $5,491 homeless; food pantry Fair Housing Council of Riverside County Comprehensive Fair Housing Fair housing education, training, technical assistance; landlord/ $20,000 Program tenant mediation Hospice of the Valleys Senior Assistance Program Provide direct costs of hospice $5,491 care for senior citizens Anti Violence Education and Provide support and services to Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Crisis Intervention survivors of sexual assault $5,491 Safe Alternatives for Everyone(SAFE) Creating SAFE Families Victim awareness; case $5,491 management; support for victims Voices for Children Court Appointed Special Case management and advocacy $5,491 Advocate (CASA) Program for foster children in Temecula Total Public Service Funds Requested for 2020-21 $83,928 BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for May 2020 are highlighted in the following table. Additional statistics are attached to this report. Building & Safety Statistics May 2020 Perm its 198 New Single Family Units 22 New Commercial Building 0 Photovoltaic 29 Tenant Improvements 11 Non Construction C of O 9 Number of Active Plan Checks 495 Number of New Plan Checks 241 Number of Finaled Permits 146 Inspections Inspections Per Day 77.2 Inspections Per Person Per Day Stops Per Month Visitors to Counter 0 New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check • Truax Hotel (161,586 sf) • Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 sf) • Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 sf each) • Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) • iA Robotics (24,659 sf) • Hotel (38,202 sf) on Jefferson and Winchester • Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 sf) • Trinity Lutheran Church Preschool (9,530 sf) • Temecula Valley Lexus Dealership (54,898 sf) Tenant Improvement • Bottega Italia — 28475 Old Town Front Street • Mountain Mike's Pizza — 27644 Ynez Road • Nana's Tamales — 28286 Old Town Front Street • Los Panchos Mexican Gill Seafood and Cantina — 41301 Margarita Road CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of May, Code Enforcement responded to 91 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 135 code cases, conducted 202 inspections, and forwarded 34 referrals. Type of Code Case May 2020 Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 7 Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance / Rodent/ Mold 2 Business ar Home Occupation w/o license/CUP 5 Trash and Debris {Dumping Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds/ Fire Hazard 23 Green Poal / Vector Control {Stagnant Water Graffiti 7 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control Trailer/ RV stored/Boat/Parking 11 Construction w/a Permit/Building Code Encroach Public ROW /Trash Cans 10 Zoning/signs 12 Public Safety & Health 23 Tota I N u m ber of Cases 13s Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. Foreclosure Tracking May 2020 Residential - Default 45 Residential- Foreclosure 57 Residential - REO 39 Total - Residential Commercial - Default 0 Commercial - Foreclosure 1 Commercial - RED 3 Total - Commercial 4 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Current Planning Activity Report 2. Community Development Statistics 3. Community Development Charts PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA20-0566 27535 Jefferson Ave 909-240-023 Eric Jones 05/01/2020 Steve Rawlings Hilbert Group PL Conditional Out Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Temecula Weddings and Event Center Conditional Use Permit: A Conditional Use Permit to allow a wedding and event center to sell beer, wine, and distilled spirits with a Type 47 License at 27535 Jefferson Avenue. PA20-0567 964-460-007 Scott Cooper 05/04/2020 Thomas Fuller Wingsweep Corp PL Maps Plan Review Case Title / Description: Roripaugh Ranch Tentative Tract Map 37925 (PA10): A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II PA20-0568 964-460-009 Scott Cooper 05/04/2020 Thomas Fuller Wingsweep Corp PL Maps Plan Review Case Title / Description: Roripaugh Ranch Tentative Tract Map 37926 (PA12): A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II PA20-0569 964-460-018 Scott Cooper 05/04/2020 Thomas Fuller Wingsweep Corp PL Maps Plan Review Case Title / Description: Roripaugh Ranch Tentative Tract Map 37928 (PA33A): A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots, 5 open space lots, and a water quality basin for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II PA20-0571 28495 Old Town Front St 922-026-008 Eric Jones 05/05/2020 05/11/2020 Michael Wardlaw CELIA PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92590 SANCHEZ Case Title / Description: 28495 Old Town Front Street Minor Mod (Planning Review Only): A Modification application (Planning Review Only) to allow wood roof shingles to be replaced with asphalt roof shingles. The project is located at 28495 Old Town Front Street. PA20-0574 46135 Grace Ct 962-410-026 Jaime Cardenas 05/07/2020 05/07/2020 Jacqueline CAM THACH PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Bonaparte Occupation Case Title / Description: Martin Financial Services: a home occupation business license for real estate brokering services. PA20-0576 40037 Amberley Cir 957-162-014 Jaime Cardenas 05/07/2020 05/07/2020 Denise Marie PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Chandler Occupation Case Title / Description: Something Lettered Designs: a home occupation business license for wedding stationery, calligraphy and signage services. Page 1 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA20-0579 30788 Eastgate Pky 957-550-011 Jaime Cardenas 05/08/2020 05/12/2020 Kimberly Trask PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Bronzed Booty Sunless Tan: a home occupation business license for mobile tanning services. PA20-0580 43127 Corte Calanda 955-172-007 Jaime Cardenas 05/08/2020 05/12/2020 Tiffany Singler PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Tiffany Case Singler Ballet Instruction: a home occupation business license for ballet instruction services. PA20-0586 44225 Festivo St 959-301-003 Eric Jones 05/11/2020 David Arneson Joan McCarthy PL Secondary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Dwelling Unit Case Title / Description: Joan McCarthy Accessory Dwelling Unit: A 1,150 square foot accessory dwelling unit located 44225 Festivo Street. PA20-0588 41852 Marwood Cir 921-581-001 Jaime Cardenas 05/12/2020 Arturo Dicochea SIV CHENG PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Gonzalez Shed MOD: a modification application for a detached 16' x 24' storage shed at the rear yard of the existing single family home located at 41852 Marwood Circle. PA20-0590 41307 Rue Jadot 953-490-001 Jaime Cardenas 05/12/2020 05/12/2020 Surya Von Rosen PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: California Serve: a home occupation business license to provide legal services. PA20-0592 27711 Diaz Rd 921-030-002 Jaime Cardenas 05/12/2020 05/14/2020 Tiffany Golson RBI TEMECULA PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92590 PROP Planning Letter Case Title / Description: Light Industrial ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 27711 Diaz Road (APN 921-030-002). PA20-0593 43050 Calle Cristal 944-332-040 Jaime Cardenas 05/13/2020 05/14/2020 Alex Wilkinson PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: SecurityNational Mortgage Company: a home occupation business license for broker, stock and securities services and consulting. PA20-0595 33343 Decada St 962-323-028 Jaime Cardenas 05/13/2020 05/14/2020 Mateo Willis PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Willis Pool Company: a home occupation business license for pool cleaning services. Page 2 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA20-0597 44274 George Cushman Ct 960-020-042 Jaime Cardenas 05/13/2020 05/18/2020 Lauren Colson MPCW PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92592 REDHAWK Planning Letter OWNER Case Title / Description: 44274 George Cushman Court ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 44274 George Cushman Court (APN 960-040-042). PA20-0598 41257 Margarita Rd 921-830-002 Jaime Cardenas 05/14/2020 Judy Doss PFP TEMECULA PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 REAL ESTATE Planning Letter HOLDINGS Case Title / Description: 41257 Margarita Zoning Letter: a zoning letter for the property located at 41257 Margarita Road, Suite B103 (921-830-002). PA20-0599 44551 La Paz Rd 922-240-082 Jaime Cardenas 05/14/2020 05/18/2020 Nathaniel Lohli PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: UAS 3D Solutions LLC: a home occupation business license for designing computer imaging and mapping solutions. PA20-0600 43564 Savona St 959-281-036 Jaime Cardenas 05/15/2020 05/18/2020 Courtnie Stauffer PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: FAWN Clothing Co.: a home occupation business license for online retail sales of apparel clothing. PA20-0601 28848 Bristol Rd 916-353-003 Jaime Cardenas 05/15/2020 05/18/2020 Zsanna Marble PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Zsanna Marble, LMFT: a home occupation business license for marriage and family therapy counseling services. PA20-0604 28495 Old Town Front St 922-026-008 Eric Jones 05/19/2020 06/02/2020 Michael Wardlaw CELIA PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92590 SANCHEZ Case Title / Description: Texas Lil's Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor Modification Application (Planning Review Only) to allow paint color revisions to an existing commercial structure located at 28495 Old Town Front Street. PA20-0605 31853 Via Tafalla 955-322-034 Jaime Cardenas 05/19/2020 05/20/2020 Seth Woolson PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Coastal Refrigeration Heating & Air: a home occupation business license for HVAC heating & cooling services. PA20-0607 33311 Avenida Bicicleta 960-124-013 Jaime Cardenas 05/19/2020 05/20/2020 GUILLERMO PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 PINA Occupation Case Title / Description: McPina Technology Services: a home occupation business license for computer repair, networking and photography services. Page 3 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA20-0609 33079 Puffin St 962-430-013 Jaime Cardenas 05/19/2020 05/20/2020 Heather Ann PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Ramaha Occupation Case Title / Description: Healthy Acupuncture: a home occupation business license for acupuncture services and alternative health consultations. PA20-0611 43500 Villa Del Sur Dr 959-040-003 Jaime Cardenas 05/19/2020 Gary Ingram RUBEN BACA PL Secondary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Dwelling Unit Case Title / Description: Baca ADU: an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) application to convert part of an existing barn structure and expand it to total as an 826 square foot ADU at the rear of the existing single-family home located at 43500 Villa Del Sur Drive. PA20-0612 31241 Comotilo Ct 918-292-045 Jaime Cardenas 05/20/2020 05/26/2020 JOSE PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 GUTIERREZ Case Title / Description: Gutierrez Addition MOD: a modification application with a proposed 307 square foot addition to expand the kitchen and living room of the existing single-family home located at 31241 Comotilo Court. PA20-0613 31700 Temecula Pky 959-080-026 Jaime Cardenas 05/20/2020 Sanveer Chhina TEMECULA PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 VALLEY HOSPITAL INC Case Title / Description: Temecula Valley Hospital EV Chargers MOD: a modification application for the installation of five (5) electric vehicle charging stations at the Hospital located at 31700 Temecula Parkway. PA20-0614 42375 Remington Ave 909-370-036 Jaime Cardenas 05/20/2020 Jeffrey Miller 5670 PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 TEMECULA Case Title / Description: Scott's Company Shade Structure MOD: a modification application to install a lattice structure underneath the facade architectural element at the front of the building entrance located at 42375 Remington Avenue. PA20-0615 27555 Ynez Rd 921-270-054 Eric Jones 05/21/2020 Melissa Tsai Heritage PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Partners Case Title / Description: Tower Plaza Modification Application (Planning Application Only): A Modification Application (Planning Review Only) to allow for paint revisions for an existing commercial structure located at 27555 Ynez Road (Tower Plaza). PA20-0616 28721 Old Town Front St 922-073-026 Eric Jones 05/26/2020 Neil Cleveland Neil Cleveland PL Extension of Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Time Case Title / Description: First and Front Extension of Time: The first Extension of Time for a previously approved Major Modification application for a commercial structure located at 28721 Old Town Front Street. Page 4 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company PA20-0617 28721 Old Town Front St 922-073-026 Eric Jones 05/26/2020 Neil Cleveland Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: First and Front Extension of Time (CUP): The first Extension of Time application for a previously approved Conditional Use Permit. The project is located at 28721 Old Town Front Street. PA20-0618 28721 Old Town Front St 922-073-026 Eric Jones 05/26/2020 Neil Cleveland Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: First and Front Modification Application (Planning Review Only): A Minor Modification application (Planning Review Only) to allow revisions to originally approved COA timing thresholds for a previously approved Major Modification. The project is located at 28721 Old Town Front Street. PA20-0619 30135 Rancho California Rd 944-370-008 Scott Cooper 05/26/2020 05/26/2020 Daniel Dobron Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Temecula Village Mail Room MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Development Plan (PA16-1427) to relocate the mail room from inside the leasing office to a free standing approximately 338 square foot accessory structure on the project site. The project is located at 30135 Rancho California Road. Owner Plan Type Status Neil Cleveland PL Extension of Plan Review Time Neil Cleveland PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula Village PL Modifications Approved Development, LP PA20-0621 31917 Jaybee Ln 962-580-029 Jaime Cardenas 05/26/2020 05/26/2020 Sharen Gloriani PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Gomez Occupation Case Title / Description: GrazefulleYours, LLC: a home occupation business license for charcuterie boards and box arrangement and deliveries. PA20-0623 31222 Mangrove Dr 961-430-054 Jaime Cardenas 05/26/2020 05/26/2020 Victoria Scarth PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Temecula Mediation: a home occupation business license for divorce mediation services. PA20-0624 44686 Longfellow Ave 961-450-007 05/27/2020 Erin Washington PL Home Plan Review (Change Of Address) Occupation Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Erin Washington - Barber, Beauty, Nails PA20-0627 964-640-010 Scott Cooper 05/28/2020 Jared Aronowitz Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend Model Home Complex (PAs22, 23A, 24): a Model Home Complex for Planning Areas 22, 23A, and 24 of Sommers Bend for seven (7) model homes, a sales office, landscaping, and parking lot. WOODSIDE 05S PL Temporary Plan Review Use Permit Page 5 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA20-0628 41923 2nd St 922-043-027 Eric Jones 05/28/2020 Joe Holasek JIM MENDOZA PL Conditional Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Margarita's Restaurant Conditional Use Permit: A Conditional Use Permit to allow a new restaurant to obtain a California Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 47 License and offer live entrainment. The project is located at 41923 2nd Street, Suite 106 PA20-0629 28588 Old Town Front St 922-033-021 Eric Jones 05/28/2020 Jeff Lohman Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Top Spin Pizza & Pong Modification: A Modification application to allow for facade improvements to the second floor of an existing commercial structure located at 28588 Old Town Front Street. Ronald Darling PL Modifications Plan Review PREAPP20-0 27985 Diaz Rd 921-040-041 Jaime Cardenas 05/07/2020 John Avila M & D Prop PL Plan Review 577 Temecula, CA 92590 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Diaz Road Hydrogen Fueling Station Pre-app: a pre -application to review a proposed hydrogen fueling station adjacent to the Downs Energy fuel station site (27985 Diaz Road). The project site is located at 28011 Diaz Road (APN 921-040-040). Page 6 of 6 Community Development Statistics - Previous 12 Months 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 12 Month Total/Average BUILDING AND SAFETY Inspections 1,393 1,552 1,862 1,897 2,072 1,591 1,606 1,788 1,999 1,025 1,754 1,544 20,083 Inspections Per Day 69.65 70.54 84.63 82.47 90.08 88.38 82.36 85.14 105.2 44.1 78.7 77.2 80 Inspections Per Person Per Day 17.41 17.63 21.15 16.49 22.52 20.1 20.6 21.29 26.3 20.1 19.9 19.3 20 Permits 257 293 372 241 296 260 288 270 280 336 159 198 3,250 New SFR Permits 3 9 16 1 41 57 64 0 35 39 0 22 287 New Projects in Plan Check 148 159 129 142 151 163 129 124 63 142 392 241 1,983 Number of Permits Finaled 151 147 163 159 185 160 206 216 160 120 110 146 1,923 Photovoltaic Permits 49 71 86 63 60 88 85 35 71 72 42 29 751 Non Construction C of O 39 23 28 27 30 19 27 35 28 20 5 9 290 Tenant Improvements w/ C of O 8 19 15 10 13 9 5 13 8 8 3 11 122 PLANNING Public Hearings 3 2 4 3 3 5 1 3 8 0 6 7 45 Planning Applications* 36 34 25 30 38 41 48 29 35 30 32 24 402 Conditional Use Permits 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 Development Plans 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 4 0 12 Extensions of Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General Plan Amendments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maps 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 Massage Permits 3 3 3 1 5 9 11 2 0 0 0 0 37 Modifications 11 18 12 14 16 11 17 5 10 13 6 10 143 Planned Dev. Overlays 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Accessory Dwelling Unit 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 2 14 Specific Plans - New 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SpecificPlans- Amendments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Temporary Use Permits 3 3 5 2 4 4 6 4 6 9 1 1 48 LR Applications Initiated 1 0 1 3 2 4 5 4 6 1 3 0 30 Pre -Applications 6 3 2 6 1 5 3 7 4 3 2 1 43 Community Development Statistics - Previous 12 Months 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 12 Month Total/Average CODE ENFORCEMENT 0 Code Inspections 971 432 310 389 439 299 466 321 303 236 168 202 4,536 Code Enforcement Cases 137 194 129 198 179 105 74 129 119 127 112 135 1,638 Vehicle Abatement Cases 6 6 0 7 3 9 3 3 3 5 4 7 56 Annual Fire Inspection Code Cases 0 5 8 4 2 2 3 4 7 5 0 0 40 Weed Abatement Cases 15 28 17 16 20 9 0 12 9 8 8 23 165 ADMINISTRATION Visitors to C Desk 1,067 1,072 1,112 999 1,232 928 979 1,211 1,038 363 0 0 10,001 Records Requests Processed 26 29 24 13 31 24 13 11 21 29 35 26 282 My CivicApp Inquiries 79 61 43 74 90 56 59 78 97 144 134 132 1,047 ECONOMIC INDICATORS 0 Residential - Default 52 53 58 55 56 53 53 53 54 61 52 45 645 Residential - Foreclosed 63 58 51 55 60 60 60 61 62 60 58 57 705 Residential REO 52 50 46 44 41 42 42 41 42 40 39 39 518 Commercial - Default 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 12 Commercial - Foreclosed 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 5 Commercial - RED 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 36 Home Occupations 26 23 28 21 22 24 27 55 43 20 13 16 318 * does not include Home Occupations Communirg Development Perlormance Report Building Inspections 2072 1999 2000 1862 1897 1788 1754 1552 1591 1606 1544 1500 1393 1025 1000 500 0 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 New Building Permits 372 300 293 296 257 w 241 200 100 260 288 270 280 336 159 198 01 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 Finded Permits III L 200 150 100 50 0 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 MAY 2020 iUAVG OTAL 3250 AV6 146 01923 Visors ro the C Desk 1232 1211 1067 1072 1112 1038 1000 999 928 979 500 363 01 0 0 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 Records Requests Processed 0 20 10 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 1V19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 MU CivicApp Inquiries 150 1 144 50 AVG 833 TOTAL' 10,001 AVG 87.25 n1047 6/19 7119 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2120 3/20 4/20 5/20 ''� The Community Development Desk, or C-Desk, is a one- 1w Wj stop shop for development! 134 132 90 97 79 74 78 61 S6 59 43 Code Enrorcemenr Cases oQ 200 150 100 50 0 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 Code Enrorcemenr Inspections 07.1 1000 750 500 250 0 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 Vehic e Abatement Cases 7.5 5 2.5 I tOTAL 1638 AVG 202 TOTAL 4536 OTAL 56 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 ' That you can report Code concerns via the City's app? Planning Applications AO 40 20 0 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 Modficahons �o 15 10 5 x 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 Pre -Applications 5 2.5 0 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20 Did A pre -application is an informal, free, and helpful tool for • applicants to receive comments on potential projects. L_ —,,A Item No. 12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Division Chief DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly Report. OF T E MFCG •G1 {y a City of Temecula Fire Department Report 1989 Incidents Reported for the month of April 2020 and City of Temecula and Both (Code 2, Alpha, Omega Code 3, Charlie, Delta, Bravo, Echo) ■ False Alarm 60 10.3% Haz Mat 1 0.2°% Medical 417 71.9% Other Fire 7 1.2% ■ Other Misc 7 1 2% Public Senice Assist 33 5.7°% Res Fire 3 0.5°% N Rescue 1 0.2°% • Ringing Alarm 6 1.0°% • Standby 12 2.1°% Traffic Colfsion 29 5.0% Vehicle Fire 2 0.3°% Wldland Fire 2 0.3°% Total: 580 100.0% False Alarm 60 Haz Mat 1 Medical 417 Other Fire 7 Other Misc 7 Public Service Assist 33 Res Fire 3 Rescue 1 Ringing Alarm 6 Standby 12 Traffic Collision 29 Vehicle Fire 2 Wildland Fire 2 Incident Total; 580 �1 y. 4 1989 City of Temecula Fire Department Report L, • 0 ••w a r • % • w� • . s1:r,,-5 • • • • evc� Nasa • • •y. , r:.,. • • • • • •• 40, r «. .••. • • • • • �3• • • • •• • .48 • • •�• w • _ - •• • r • i � • tit- setir �.,�zz• • r-�; � >. aeon a: • • `i • • • j '�_"�• • • • • ••_ • r Jiy{ u�a *1 • • • i • • • N • �� • �x, I f • so Call Comparison for Month and year to date 3 Month 2019 YTD 2020 YTD April 741 580 Year Total 2925 2844 Legend • Fka • MQtllcal Rinerz itle Coirrty Fie Stettin • Hezvtl • Othc Msc Hez Met • PSA Reservatims ' cosines F T EMFCG •G1 19 City of Temecula Fire Department Report1989 ,H�o� Fire Department Prevention Plan Review and Inspections Review and Inskl=pections April Yeadate7 Plan Review 176 1053 Construction Inspections 84 632 Annual Inspections 742 1802 Counter/Public Inquiries 0 436 rMan y ,..nPH d, .. I ■ Item No. 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (May 2020) PREPARED BY: Steve DaSilva, Lieutenant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for the month of May 2020. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 5,999 "Priority One" calls for service 38 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 5.56 VOLUNTEERS Chaplain N/A Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours N/A Reserve officer hours (patrol) N/A Explorer N/A Station/Administration N/A Total Volunteer hours N/A CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention workshops N/A Neighborhood watch meetings conducted N/A Safety presentations/Training N/A Special events N/A Residential/Business security surveys conducted N/A Businesses visited N/A Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up N/A Station Tour N/A Planning Review Projects N/A Temp Outdoor Use Permits N/A Sq. Footage of Graffiti Removed 314 Total customers served 73 Fingerprints/Live Scans 4 Police reports filed 65 Citations signed off 12 Total receipts $1,104 SPECIAL TEAMS (PROBLEM ORIENTED POLICING) On sight felony arrests 3 On sight misdemeanor arrests 1 Felony arrest warrants served 0 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 2 Follow-up investigations 5 Parole/Probation Searches 2 Pedestrian Checks 6 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks 21 Crime Free Housing Checks 10 SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM) On sight felony arrests 2 On sight misdemeanor arrests 2 Felony arrest warrants served 1 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 1 Area Checks 215 Camp Checks 15 Pedestrian Checks (New Contacts) 25 Follow-up Checks (Old Contacts) 15 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks... 8 SPECIAL TEAMS (SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM) On sight felony arrests 4 On sight misdemeanor arrests 14 Felony arrest warrants served 1 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 0 Follow-up investigations 6 Parole/Probation Searches 3 Pedestrian Checks 0 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks... 0 Marijuana Dispensary Checks 0 SPECIAL TEAMS (Burglary Suppression Team) Felony arrests 7 Felony filings 4 Total Cases Assigned 20 Total Cases Closed 17 Search Warrants Served 7 Citations issued for hazardous violations 711 Non -hazardous citations 80 Parking citations 64 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 179 Seatbelts 23 Cell Phone Cites 64 Injury collisions 13 D.U.I. Arrests 17 Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints 0 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 161 Total Cases Assigned 25 Total Cases Closed 22 Search Warrants 25 Arrests 6 Out of Custody Filings 5 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls for service 90 Felony arrest/filings 0 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 1 Traffic Citations 0 Fingerprints/Live Scans 24 Total receipts $1,432 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests N/A Misdemeanor arrests N/A Reports N/A Citations N/A Meetings/Presentations N/A ***Schools Closed Month of May*** Item No. 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: http://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-Improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Butterfield Stage Road Extension - Phase III, PW15-11 Description: Widening of Butterfield Stage Road from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road, which includes widening of Rancho California Road to four lanes through the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road (Riverside County is a partner on this major circulation project). Cost: $8,018,372 Status: Construction began on June 10, 2019. Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25 Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch may be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. Cost: $4,566,513 Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — May 2021. Current activities include development and review of preliminary design alternatives. French Valley Parkway / Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $137,356,246 Status: Currently in design. Work continues on the environmental re-evaluation. 1 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) 1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02 Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp. Cost: $7,775,000 Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — May 2021. Current activities include traffic operations analyses, preliminary roadway design, initiation of noise study work program, and initiation of drainage studies. Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South. Cost: $51,959,957 Status: Construction complete. Working with Caltrans on project closeout and acceptance. Project information is available on the project website: www.1579South.info Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. Cost: $14,307,394 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. Request for Authorization of Preliminary Engineering submitted to Caltrans on March 14, 2018. Design consultant has been selected through the RFP process. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Design is underway. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. Pre -application meeting with RCA was held in November 2019. First Joint Project Review (JPR) environmental submittal to RCA is anticipated in Spring of 2020 and CEQA approval in Fall of 2020 oil City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Ynez Road (Winchester to Date), Equity Drive, County Center Drive Loop, and Winchester Road (Nicolas to Easterly City Limits), PW18-01 Description: Rehabilitation of Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Date Street, Equity Drive and County Center Drive loop, and Winchester Road from Nicolas Road to easterly City Limits. Cost: $936,623 Status: Currently on hold awaiting completion of Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and Developer improvements. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW19-17 Description: Rehabilitation of Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Road, Avenida Alvarado, Via Dos Picos, Business Park Drive, Del Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas Street, Enterprise Circle North, and Via Montezuma from Murrieta Creek to Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $2,200,000 Status: Currently in design. Construction September 2020 — February 2021. Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Cost: $1,032,674 Status: The project is currently in design. 3 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Ynez Road Improvements, PW17-17 Description This project includes widening Ynez Road, from Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscape medians, streetlights and modification of the traffic signal at Santiago Road. Cost: $4,571,766 Status: Design is at 60%. The design is scheduled to be completed during the FY 2020-2021. M City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Citywide Streetlight Acquisition and Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit, PW17-18 Description: The purchase and acquisition of 7,279 light poles, including Phases 1, 2 & 3, of the Southern California Edison (SCE) streetlights has been completed. Effective November 12, 2019, the City has assumed ownership, and operations and maintenance of the streetlight poles located within the City limits. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting system retrofit and the installation of a wireless lighting control node system for all streetlights Citywide has also been completed. SCE has offered a rebate for the lighting retrofit and we anticipate receipt of rebate funds in late Summer 2020. Cost: $8,003,311 Status: The purchase and acquisition, and LED retrofit of arterial and residential streetlights is complete. The SCE rebate for the LED retrofit is anticipated to be received late Summer 2020. Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, PW17-29 Description: The project includes the administration, design and construction of six (6) sites within the City for the conversion of water facilities from potable to recycled water. This effort is in cooperation with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) to administer the implementation of improvements in association with the State of California Department of Water Resources Proposition 84 Grant Agreement. Cost: $686,039 Status: Construction is underway and anticipated to be complete by August 2020. Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe. Cost: $3,887,550 Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — December 2020. Current activities include 60% design plans and preparation of environmental revalidation studies. 5 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21 Description: Construction of a new recreation center in Margarita Community Park in place of the former YMCA building. Includes demolition of the existing building and pool, and construction of a new building, as determined by a feasibility study. Phase II includes the design and construction of an expansion of the current on -site parking facility. Cost: $8,656,508 Status: Concept Designs for Bridging Documents are underway. Design -Build Team Prequalification responses were received on December 18, 2019 and staff is recommending to pre -qualify six firms at the February 25, 2020 City Council meeting. RFP for Design -Build Team was expected to be completed in April 2020 but project was placed on hold due to the Covid-19 situation. RFP will now be completed in June and posted in July of 2020. Old Town Parking Structure, PW17-15 Description: Design and eventual construction of a new parking facility in Old Town. The Old Town Parking Management Plan will outline a number of parking strategies best suited to serve Old Town Temecula. Cost: $1,000,000 Status: Parking study is being updated. Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail. Cost: $6,288,595 Status: Design is being finalized and the environmental document has been initiated. The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. Currently processing application for Caltrans Streamlined Oversite and Encroachment Permit/Plan Check with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC). Anticipate design to be completed in February 2020. Resubmittal of Environmental Documents to RCA took place on January 2, 2020. ISMND circulation is scheduled for February 14 with City Council approval in April of 2020. CTC request for construction fund authorization submitted in April for a June 2020 allocation; construction bidding would follow shortly thereafter. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks — Citywide (Third Street), PW17-24 Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side of Third Street, between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street and the west side of Mercedes Street from Third Street for approximately 150' to the north. Portion adjacent to the proposed parking structure for the hotel will be completed by private developer. Cost: To be determined Status: Design is almost complete. Project cannot be constructed until the Truax Hotel parking structure is under construction due the change in street grade. Sidewalks — Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement, PW17-16 Description: Replace boardwalk plank boards with colored concrete sidewalk. Cost: $1,112,563 Status: Construction Contract was awarded at City Council meeting on June 25, 2019. Construction started on August 12, 2019. Construction completed in May 2020. Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road. Cost: $198,920 Status: Project currently in design. 7 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Eagle Soar Splash Pad Control System Renovation Description: The project provides for the renovation and updating of the splash pad control system to meet current Health & Safety requirements. Cost: $200,000 Status: Control system design and installation due to be completed July 2020. Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site. Cost: $1,280,284 Status: Preparation of the environmental document is underway. Evaluating construction alternatives to lessen environmental mitigation requirements. Geotechnical investigation for design alternatives performed in mid -August 2019. Geotechnical report received October 1, 2019. Redesign started in February of 2020. CEQA to be completed in summer of 2020. Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Butterfield Stage Park and Vail Ranch Park. Cost: $1,127,800 Status: Project is currently in design. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued) Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks. Cost: $5,157,649 Status: Playground renovations & replacements planned for FY20/21 include Sam Hicks, John Magee, Stephen Michael Linen, and Winchester Creek Parks Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of the restroom building expansion, including adding stalls and urinals. It also includes renovating the snack bar, and enlarging the storage case. Cost: $725,000 Status: Project is currently in design. Sports Court Resurfacing Description: Repairs and resurfacing of sport court surfacing at various parks and facilities. This includes tennis courts, basketball courts, and hockey rinks at various parks. Cost: $270,257 Status: Repairs and court resurfacing planned next year upon City Council approval of the Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2021-2025. Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion Description: Replacement of aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports parks. Cost: $630,000 Status: Purchase and installation of Musco Lighting planned for Ronald Reagan Sports Park Upper Soccer Fields, and Skate Park and Hockey Rink in FY20/21. 9 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS Hilton Garden Inn Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 66,991 square foot, three-story, 104 room Hilton Garden Inn Hotel with underground parking and additional off -site parking located approximately north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. Status: Permit issued October 4, 2019. Ongoing review of project by the Land Development division. Mexico Cafe Description: Grading plan and Street Improvement Plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 13,375 square foot Mexico Cafe restaurant south of the Temecula Parkway and Pechanga Parkway intersection. Status: Permit issued September 13, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Rancho Soleo (Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road) Description: Grading plan to allow for the final map and construction of a 245-unit multi -family development. Status: Permit issued October 16, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Project is being phased at this time. It is anticipated the development will reach 25% occupancy in Spring of 2021. 10 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT June 23, 2020 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued) Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch) Description: Land Development oversight of the following submittals in plan check: Final Map reviews, Community Sports Park Improvement Plan, Sommers Bend — Rough Grading Plan; Street Improvement Plan; Storm Drain Improvement Plan; Street Light Plan; Signing & Striping Plan. Status: Grading Permit issued September 27, 2018. The Loop Road (Sommers Bend) is completely paved with streetlights installed. The Community Sports Park has kicked off construction in June 2020. Models in two tracts are under construction. The Sommers Bend recreation center is also under construction. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Anticipated completion of models in mid -summer of 2020. Staybridge Suites Description: Grading plan to allow for an approximately 90,832 square foot, 4-story, 125-room Staybridge Suites hotel located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue. Status: Permit issued March 11, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Temecula Village Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of a 160-unit apartment community located on the south side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Drive. Status: Permit issued June 27, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. 11 ELECTRONIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 8:43 AM To: Subject: RE: We support Law Enforcement/ Public Safety in Temecula Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the June 23d meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Mike Naggar <mnaggar@citycouncil.org> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:51 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: We support Law Enforcement/ Public Safety in Temecula „f Verified City Account Begin forwarded message: From: "Christine O'Neil" <bconeil105 Re: We support Law Enforcement/ Public Safety in Temecula Date: June 11, 2020 at 12:47:55 PM PDT To: Mike Naggar <mnaggar(cDcitycouncil org> Thank you....that is what we had in mind. God be with You and the other Members of the Council. On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:32 PM Mike Naggar <mna ar cit council.or > wrote: Thanks Christine. If you want this read into the record at our next council meeting you will have send to the city clerk. You can just let her know by replying. Luv Ya, Mike > On Jun 10, 2020, at 6:23 PM, Christine O'Neil < wrote: > We support all budgets/ spending for Law Enforcement & Public Safety in Temecula. > We greatly appreciate the excellent service we have received from the members of Law Enforcement/ First Responder's team. > Sincerely, > Brian and Christine O'Neill > 30 years Temecula Homeowners Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 8:26 AM To: Diana Gorham Subject: RE: Police Force Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randdi.johl temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Diana Gorham < Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 4:18 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Police Force Regarding the message with the first line "Isn't it time Temecula had its own Police Force". The msg. should be signed Ed Gorham (20 yr. Temecula resident.) From: Diana Gorham < Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 4:14 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Police Force Isn't it time Temecula had its own Police Force? Perhaps it could be about half the size it is now and make sure not to hire anyone who has ever used excessive force. Also, it would be good to hire people who live in Temecula, or the Pechanga Res. Randi Johl From: Diana Gorham < Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 9:51 AM To: RandiJohl Subject: Re: Police Force You may read the E mail at the council meeting, however please say it is from Ed Gorham On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:25 AM Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Diana Gorham < Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 4:18 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.iohl@temecuiaca.g_o_v> Subject: Police Force Regarding the message with the first line "Isn't it time Temecula had its own Police Force". The msg. should be signed Ed Gorham (20 yr. Temecula resident.) From: Diana Gorham < Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 4:14 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.mohl temeculaca. ❑v> Subject: Police Force Isn't it time Temecula had its own Police Force? Perhaps it could be about half the size it is now and make sure not to hire anyone who has ever used excessive force. Also, it would be good to hire people who live in Temecula, or the Pechanga Res. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:06 AM To: Suzanne Lane Subject: RE: Comment for council meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randijohi temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Suzanne Lane < Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 6:15 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comment for council meeting Please address and correct the county numbers of COVID patients as we have been including those being flown in at night, feom imperial valkey, who should not be MOVED if covid positive, as if they are our numbers. That's why our numbers are rising!! Dirty political game htt s://www.facebook.com/scott. arkinsonll osts/10219560391895191 Thankyou Suzanne Lane Sent from my Whone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:06 AM To: Suzanne Lane Subject: RE: Urgent! Regarding public comment Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohl@temeoulaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Suzanne Lane < Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 9:23 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Urgent! Regarding public comment Hi. Thank you for taking a minute to read these. 2 articles about Northern California mayor who lashes out at the latest face covering rule stating there's no law that there is NIO LAW that orders you to wear a mask! Thanks Suzanne Lane �] https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirusZar-ticle243686692.html htt s: www.latimes.com california stor 2020-06-21 ma or-of-nevada-cit -in-northern-california-lashes-out-at-face- coverines-rule Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:08 AM To: Suzanne Lane Subject: RE: Public comment submission Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Please note that we have received several emails from you. We will read the emails together up to the 3-minute time limit that is allowed for non -agenda public comments. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.io�a3temecuIaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Suzanne Lane < Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 4:32 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment submission I would like to comment on the June 18th "Guidance" for use of masks posted in the California State Health Department website. This has been touted and repeated in many newspapers and online news sources as "Governor Newsom issued an order that all Californians must wear masks". We do not live in a kingdom and he is not the king that can make a proclamation and tell us what to do. He is 1 of 3 co -equals. He is administration. Even via executive order, he can not legislate. He directs agencies, such as the health department to issue orders. So, Newsom can not compel any individual to do anything! Next, the state Public Health "Guidance" from June 18, 2020 is essentially a press release. It is not an order or mandate or law. If it were, it would reference the law being followed. Also, it would State what happens if not followed and the penal code # on it. If you look at what they posted, it has none of these and in fact says it is "Guidance". Yes it says we "must" wear face coverings but, "must" is not a legally enforceable word. The word "Shall" is enforceable. This is guidance and In fact is less restrictive than the one posted in April!! (Perhaps in a nefarious way, that is why so much media is portraying it as though we all have to wear them now. Perhaps because they know it's less restrictive "Guidance" and want to keep people in fear!?). also the "Guidance" has a whole list of persons who are exempt from wearing a covering", including "persons with a medical condition for whom wearing a face covering could instruct breathing! I say this would apply to every human as our bodies require a certain level of oxygen to function correctly. Only a licensed medical professional is qualified to determine if someone is healthy enough to wear a mask as it negatively affects the respiratory, immune and neurological systems. Also, HIPPA protects us from having to disclose our medical condition. So, we are all free to NOT wear face coverings according to law. Plus our sherriff will not enforce it. Social shaming is unacceptable. To shame me for nolt wearing a mask to protect you is unreasonable. When will it end? Will you forever wear a mask because there will ALWAYS be flu and diseases floating around. We need to breath and interact and build our immunity. Also, there is no science to show that masks protect you at all! All 7 studies noted 1 on the CDC website are inconclusive. If someone wants to wear one fine, but it is NOT an order and not enforceable. And please see California Civil Code Section 51.7 a and b for actual law that protects us from discrimination in places of business. And please reference the latest FDA announcement regarding hydroxychloroquine. The media also twisted this. It actually means that it's not just restricted for hospital use now. The most severe cases that they were seeing may not benefit as much, so it's open for everyone now. Any doctor can prescribe as he wishes It's been around for decades, FDA approved plus, the New England journal of medicine was wrong about it being dangerous. (See attached redaction). This medicine works for COVID and even as a preventative. Please let the people know the truth. Thank you very much! ='�r 'IV NEW ENGLAND JOC1RHr1Ln(MI?DICINI+. _ CORR ES PONDCNCE Retraction: Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med. DOI: 10.1056/NCJMoa2007621. lure d, 2020 D0I:'10.1056f NEIMc20'2122S Metrics 2 Citing Articles Related Articles TO THE EDITOR; lkcausr:ill the authors were not gi-mted access lu the n3W dnt:1 and Ilse rrrw data could not be made AvailnbICIO a third-p:ulyaudiuwr, WC;u'c unahIC to valid:lte the hrim:u'y data sow'CUS underlying our article, '(':IrdiOV%iscular DiSCON0, Drug Tlk-11py, and Mortality in Covid-14."1 % e therefore rcy11cS1 Ihat tliC:Irticle be retracted. 4Ve :ywlogizc to the edilorS and to residers of IheJnurnal liirthe dilllCUIOC'S Ihat this has Caused. hlancleep R. Mclim, NLD. Brigham And Wonwil's I lospital Hear) and Vascular Center, Ruston, MA mutchra(ilbwh.h:uvartl.ctiu Snpan S. Deaai, M.D., I''h.D, Surgisphere, Chicngo, IL SreyRant Ku)', M.D., lvL11.S. Ba.VIOI- CONCgVofViCdicine, Houstun,'1'S Timothy D. Henry, M.D. Chris) Hospital, Cincinnati, 011 Suzanne Lane Sent from my Whone 3 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:00 PM To: garrison 10 Subject: RE: Masks Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: garrisonl0 < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:57 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Masks We need to be united on enforcing the Governor and the cdc guidlines on wearing masks. The health of our city depends on your leadership. This is not the time to cave to non science argument's. This is not about being liked or worrying about you being reelected. TVUSD school board has one board member who agrees students should wear masks. She is marrried to a pediatrician. This is about saving lives not a popularity 12:48 (,P N 'Rwit 13% 3 THIS ISN'T ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL a FREEDOM. IT IS NOT AKIN TO CHOOSING WHETHER OR NOT TO WEAR A SEATBELT--IT'S CHOOSING WHETHER OR NOT TO DRIVE BLINDLY INTO A CROWD.' Jeffrey S. Hood 24 MINUTES AGO Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:18 PM To: Emily Carian Subject: RE: Public comment for 6/23/20 Temecula City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl r�?r_.temeculaca;goy 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Emily Carian < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:58 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment for 6/23/20 Temecula City Council Meeting Hello. Please read this comment at the 6/23/20 City Council meeting. "My name is Emily Carian and I am a Temecula resident. I write to call on our City Council members to propose and implement a robust plan for protecting Temecula residents from police violence. They must reallocate funds from policing to social services that improve the quality of life, mental and physical health, housing and food security, and economic outcomes of Temecula residents. The purview of police has expanded immensely over the last several decades. We now ask police to respond to situations they are not trained for, including mental health crises, homelessness, and discipline problems in school. The simultaneous militarization of our police means that officers respond to situations they are not trained for, with military grade weapons. We must narrow the focus of police work to situations officers are actually trained for, and reinvest some of the $38.5 million dollars Temecula spends contracting with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department into addressing these fundamental social problems. As one example, Temecula should develop and fund a dedicated team of mental health care professionals who will provide immediate care to residents in crisis. In 2016, Matthew Tucker, an 18-year-old Temecula resident, called 911 when he experienced suicidal thoughts. Riverside County Sheriffs responded to the scene and shot and killed him. Imagine if Matthew had been able to call a licensed mental health professional who could have deescalated the situation and connected him with long-term services. Because of the current budget priorities of our city, Matthew's best option was to call 911, and he was murdered. Some will object to defunding the police, saying decreasing police presence will make Temecula less safe. But one cannot argue that police presence made Matthew or his family safer. Decades of research show that people of color (particularly Black people) are subject to over -policing, police harassment, and police violence. In other words, police presence makes people of color less safe. All four of the City Council members promised action at the meeting on June 9. The strongest, most impactful action they could take is to reduce our city's police budget and reinvest that money in Temecula residents." Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:23 PM To: Julie Geary Subject: RE: Mask use in public spaces Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.joh I@temeculaca. gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Julie Geary < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:56 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Mask use in public spaces Hello my name is Julie Geary and I have been a resident of Temecula Valley since 1997. 1 am concerned that many businesses are not enforcing the mask order, putting their employees and customers at risk. Some business are not enforcing social distancing as well. The Riverside County sheriff originally said that they would not enforce the mask order even though there is copious amounts of scientific evidence to the efficacy of mask use. We have recently seen a dramatic spike in cases before the new mask order went into effect. I hope that the city takes this new order seriously and works with the health department to enforce this new rule. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ https.ljpubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.OcO3252?ref=pdf -Julie Geary Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM To: Tammy Meyer Subject: RE: Open Comments for 6/23 City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk ran&0ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Tammy Meyer < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:53 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Open Comments for 6/23 City Council Meeting To The Temecula City Council, I am extremely concerned about the lack of mask wearing that I see in our city. Granted the mask mandate only came from the State of California last week, this should have always been a requirement to reduce the exposure to this virus. Our local government (including the sheriff's department) must be a leader in this effort. When our city council representatives scoff at the idea of wearing a face mask and our sheriff states that he will not enforce mask wearing, you are telling us that you do not care about the public health. Shame on you for that. Our infection rates are going up as a result of businesses going back to business as usual, and two Temecula businesses have closed down due to staff members being infected. You must understand that these businesses have put our community at a risk and that is unacceptable. Mayor Edwards, please rise to the occasion. I know you love this community. Make the hard decision and mandate all businesses to require masks of their patrons and employees. Do the right thing before it's too late for the residents of Temecula. Thankyou Tammy from 92592 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM To: Subject: RE: June 23rd Board Meeting Comment/Question Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:55 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: June 23rd Board Meeting Comment/Question Hello, In light of the Governor's new mask orders that came down last week, I have concerns about local businesses who aren't enforcing the mandate. We all know that masks significantly contribute to reduced rates of infection and I consider it the easiest way I can contribute to the safety of my fellow residents. With that said, a majority of the COVID cases in Temecula stem from 92592 so it begs the question why businesses, gyms especially, who service residents in that zip code, aren't enforcing mask -wearing by their customers. If a business is open, they should be following the rules. Most gyms in town are not "outdoors," a caveat provided in the Governor's order. Exercise is important to us all during these times and I'm a fierce lover of my gym, but it's deeply concerning to see Fitness 19 on Temecula Parkway dismiss public health recommendations and create their own rules (that aren't being enforced). No doubt that this will backfire eventually. Especially considering how far droplets can extend with forced exhalation as seen with exercise, the standard 6 ft rule may not be sufficient to protect others sans a mask. Yes, working out with a mask isn't the easiest, but if we are all to enjoy the gym, it's important we all play by the same sets of rules. If we are truly "in this together," we need to protect one another and do our part. Thank you, Concerned Gym Goer Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM To: Christy Ramos Subject: RE: Comment for meeting tomorrow Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: Christy Ramos < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:25 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comment for meeting tomorrow Hi Randi, Hope you're having a good Monday. I'd like to include this comment. "Please enforce the order from the Governor about wearing masks. Several businesses are not adhering to the order and allowing customers to roam the aisles without social distancing and without masks. I understand this is a divisive issue but we need to stop the spread of COVID in our community. The only way to do that is to follow the Governors orders. Also, who do I contact to make complaints to report those not following orders? Thank you." Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:49 AM To: Sydney Warner Subject: RE: City council meeting 6-23-20 Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: Sydney Warner < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 11:35 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City council meeting 6-23-20 Council members, It's deeply concerning to me the blatant disregard the city of Temecula has shown in the wearing face masks/coverings. With the riverside county sheriffs department openly saying it would not enforce the CA mandate and our own council members snarking at the idea of wearing a face covering, I fear that COVID-19 will continue to spread in our county like wildfire. I ask that the council and local government please rise to the occasion and begin enforcing this new mandate before more businesses close and more people become infected. Please, I implore the City of Temecula and it's Local government to promote masks and prevent more deaths. Thank you for listening, Syd 92596 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:38 AM To: Darla Gordon Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Comment Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi. iohl@te_meculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Darla Gordon < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:36 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council Meeting Comment To Whom it May Concern, As a 14 year resident of this valley, I am emailing my concern with the city and this county regarding the spread of COVID-19. My concern is that Temecula and Riverside County will not enforce the mandatory face covering order from Governor Newsom. The increase in numbers in our valley is on the rise and if we do not require the face coverings and take precautions we will continue to see those number increase. Our County Sheriff Bianco has made public statements saying he will not enforce the order. This is problematic. His job is to protect and serve, yet he is refusing to protect the very constituents that elected him. As a voting, tax paying citizen I am asking that you enforce and urge all citizens to follow health and safety orders to keep us all as safe as possible during this time. Thank You, Darla Gordon Thanks, Darla Gordon Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM To: Tiffiny Gage Subject: RE: Unity in the Community Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohI0.temeculaca. gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Tiffiny Gage < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:38 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Unity in the Community Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Tiffiny Gage of French Valley/Winchester, am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Tiffiny Gage Resident Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee. The information may also be confidential and/or legally privileged. This transmission is sent for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction, or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and its attachments, if any. E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC SS 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:36 AM To: 'Julie Geary' Subject: RE: Unity in the Community Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johI@temeculaca. gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Julie Geary< Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:33 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Unity in the Community Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I Julie Geary of Temecula, CA am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Julie Geary Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:33 AM To: ZOYA BRYANT Subject: RE: Temecula Unity Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: ZOYA BRYANT < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:00 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula Unity Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I _Zoya Bryant_ of _Tenecula, CA)_ am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Zoya Bryant Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:34 AM To: Samantha Ingels Subject: RE: City council meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi jahl@temeculaca,aoy 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Samantha Ingels < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:52 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City council meeting Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Samantha Ingels of MURRIETA, CA am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, SAMANTHA INGELS Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:33 AM To: RE And Living Subject: RE: Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temecuiaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: RE And Living < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:10 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Vanessa Brooks, of Temecula, am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Vanessa Brooks Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:33 AM To: Julia Kandus Subject: RE: Bringing Unity to Temecula Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk ra nd i .johl@temecu I aca . g ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Julia Kandus < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:00 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Bringing Unity to Temecula Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Julia Kandus, of Temecula, CA am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Julia Kandus Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:35 PM To: Tim McDonald Subject: RE: Temecula Unity - To City Counsel Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk rand i.'ohl temeculaca. oov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Tim McDonald < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:27 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula Unity - To City Counsel Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Tim McDonald, a resident here since 1989, am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Tim McDonald Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:00 PM To: Ashley Clingingsmith Subject: RE: Temecula Unity Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk ra ndi.iohI(c_Dtemeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ashley Clingingsmith < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:57 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula Unity Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Ashley Clingingsmith of Temecula CA am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Ashley Clingingsmith Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:18 PM To: Ursula Antinelli Subject: RE: Lack of Attendance at last weeks community meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ursula Antinelli < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:17 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Lack of Attendance at last weeks community meeting Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last wee k Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I Ursula Antinelli of _Temecula Ca am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Ursula Antinelli Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM To: Christen Alarcon Subject: RE: Temecula Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: Christen Alarcon < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:34 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I , Christen Alarcon, of Temecula, am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. I would like to know exactly where Temecula officials stand on racism in our community. Do you support the white business owners of Old Town Temecula, whom I witnessed with guns on their laps while people peacefully advocated for equality? How do I explain that scene to my beautiful bi-racial children? You have been astonishingly quiet, which makes me question your leadership. Luckily, the youth of Temecula are We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Christen Alarcon Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:33 AM To: Jay Alarcon Subject: RE: City Council Meeting 6/23/2020 Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temecuiaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jay Alarcon < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:00 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council Meeting 6/23/2020 Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted "Unity in the Community" at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. As a participant, I was disappointed to see that there was no one from city council present at the event. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did even attempt to participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community, Please remember, it is no longer acceptable to not have a stance. With elections coming up, our voted council persons must represent the interest of their community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Jay Alarcon, PhD(c), MBA, MA Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:53 AM To: Julie Schwaben Subject: RE: Temecula Unity event Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk ra nd i.joh1.(a)te m egu I aca . gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Julie Schwaben < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:47 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johI@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula Unity event Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I Julie Schwaben of Temecula am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. Zak is always showing up and is an incredible man. I am sure he must have been ill. 1 am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Julie Schwaben Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:33 PM To: Brandon Whitney Subject: RE: Diversity in Temecula and Progress against Racism Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi. ohl terneculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Brandon Whitney < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:32 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Diversity in Temecula and Progress against Racism Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Brandon Whitney of Temecula, California, am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. I would like to know your plans to deal with the issues of diversity and racism in Temecula. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. Sincerely, Brandon Whitney Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM To: 'Reecha Upadhyaya' Subject: RE: For the council meeting today Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.0ahlCa7temeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Reecha Upadhyaya < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:44 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: For the council meeting today Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Reecha Hindes of Temecula, am deeply disappointed to see that there was such a blatant lack of city council representation at the event last week. What kind of message does that send to the community? Does temecula not want to be known as an inclusive community? Do you not want folks from diverse backgrounds help propel our economy and growth? Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. After all, you are elected to be the voice for all of us and not just a subset of our population. Please stand up for your good conscience and help make Temecula the paradise who wish it to be. Sincerely, Reecha Thank you! '+Reecho Upadhyaya" Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:34 AM To: Melissa Bahou Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk rand i. iohl(d)temeculaca.goy 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Melissa Bahou < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:59 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council Meeting Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last Wednesday evening, Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. The night was full of stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and a discussion of how we can come together to push forward diversity awareness and acceptance within our town. I , Melissa Bahou of Temecula was underwhelmed by the representation of City Council at this event. Council person Zak Schwank was the only member willing to attend and did send his regrets when he fell ill. I commend him for viewing the live stream and meeting with members of the community on his own time. I am saddened that other city council members made zero effort to be apart of a wonderful night of listening, sharing, and growing. I've lived in the area since 1994, 1 will be raising my children here as my husband is a local business owner, I cannot stand by and let this slide while also trying to set an example of love and acceptance for my daughter. We as a community need to be future ready, and that future includes equality for all and a love for every neighbor. I know Temecula wants to be apart of something great, wants to be a city where everyone feels supported and welcome, and that starts with you, City Council Members. My hope is for your participation and attendance at future events held by Temecula Unity, open dialogues for how we can work together and a future for Temecula where everyone is safe and loved. Sincerely, Melissa Bahou P.S. Wear a mask. Loving thy neighbor also includes wearing a mask during a very real pandemic that Riverside County is failing to defeat. Please encourage everyone to wear a mask. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:35 PM To: Yahoo Subject: RE: Council Meeting Concern Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: Yahoo < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 202012:41 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Council Meeting Concern Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Alma Gervacio of Riverside, am deeply disappointed to see that there was such a blatant lack of city council representation at the event last week. What kind of message does that send to the community? Does Temecula not want to be known as an inclusive community? Do you not want folks from diverse backgrounds help propel our economy and growth? Although I don't live in the city, I do work here and care about what's happening here. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. As city leaders, it is your job to listen to your community's concerns. Do not hide away from your own community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. After all, you are elected to be the voice for all of us and not just a subset of our population. Please stand up for your good conscience and help make Temecula the paradise you wish it to be. Sincerely, Alma Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:42 PM To: Karen Garner Subject: RE: Unity in the Community Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi johl(cDtemeculaca-c 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Karen Garner < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:41 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Unity in the Community Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Karen Garner of Temecula, CA, am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to Temecula. We have an amazing opportunity to make systemic change in Temecula that can work to ensure all residents feel included, safe and valued regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion or lack there of, gender identity or orientation or any other difference that makes them unique. I would love to see our city become purposefully inclusive in vision, action, and policy. Sincerely, Karen Garner Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:39 PM To: albia miller Subject: FW: Attachments: Temcula Stew 2.rtf Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: albia miller < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:21 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; randijohl@temeculaca.gov Subject: dear Ms. Johl Glad to hear you are well. Offices of Miller, Catlin, Rivera Save Councilman Stew Stewart June 23, 2020 Who has stood for Temecula by recommending partiipation in Local actvities and supported farmer's markets and started#Hometown Heroes? Who has stood for Protecting Small businesses So we can retain needed services if major systems have experienced a shut down? Who has stood for Temecula by voting against projects that would Endanger Native Wildlife Corridors? Locally elected official, Stew Steward who hasn't solicited more work as Project Managers for Developers paving over the Earth. Stew Stewart works for your everyday needs such as keeping the schools open, the roads safe, the water from geyser leaks, the parks manicured, the Boys and Girls Club funded. Stop Endangering Temecula by voting for people who vote for more Buildings!!! Temecula is not a small town. If you add the 100,000 cars and Trucks that pass the City Hall everyday to the 150,000 that live here that is 250,000 people in this town and another 25,000 for Entertainment, We are talking almost as large as Corona with Hotels, Pechanga, Resorts, visiting, Events, Enterprenuerings, Hiking, etc. Temecula is a mini Las Vegas and getting worse. Who would know more about the massive negative effects of more housing than the Local Council People like Stew Stewart unless they live Multi Regionally lives developing more and more congestion with destructive constructing and not even experiencing day to day in Temecula like Mike Naggar, project manager for more destruction or Mr. Haun more at UCSD than Temecula. That is part of reason for these new Hotels is to stay closer to their development. No sense of Community there. Temecula Stew as he is named is a serious contributor to keeping Temecula at its current over built Metropolitan former Rural area with a few Historical areas left instead of past elected officials who have actually solicitied developers. Can you even image more Hotels and Apartments which is on the Master Plan? Mr. Stewart supports remodeling any Historical venues like Vail Ranch and bringing it to the attention of schools and civic groups. However, he made a remark that has cost him his councilship. He needs to be forgiven and back in his seat. As emotions are running high and some Police choices are most Uncalled for and even Fatal and weapons do not forgive, we are all going to make communicaton indiscresions. Murrieta's Mayor Alan Long had a DUI and ran into four Night Hawk Cheerleaders in his truck and seriously injured one and he was reelected. Mr. Stewart said What? That he could not recall a good person of color being shot by Temecula Police. The Tyisha Miller shooting was Riverside Police and in deed was long term Honorably fought for Justice by many Temeula Citizens which means they had to go to court in Riverside. They even sat on the Freeway and stopped traffic to show solidarity with the decision that those Police needed to go to jail. Mr. Stewart is talking about Temecula police. Temecula would have a 3 billlion dollar economy from tax revenue from Hotels, tract housng and I say what for? This is the rural country: Temecula had nothing like that 35 years ago and nothing like an overcrowded, car wreck prone, crime ridden large town and it still had amazing and diverse activities from grape growing on much smaller scale, to avocado and citrus farms. It was quite, lovely, clean, great air quality, classical music, ballet, Native species, Western Art, the Great Oak Tree, churches, and Indian Museums and ceremonies. It had Everything accept traffic, bad air, poor water quanity and quality, extensive crme, and now, overrun with rodents. Mr. Stewart keeps us informed on his Face Book Page about the Statistics of COVID, keeps us up on Road Closures, Special People's Needs during COVID, works with Cal Fire to prevent Wildfires in Temecula, supports Candlelight walking tours of Temecula, and researches people for his #HometownHeroes and a Pro Small Business page on his Face Book and, there is no reason to lose this valuable Community Servant. He also confers with the Police as to their presence in a respectful position to Peaceful Protesting and that is why the Peace was kept during highly emotiional Protesting in Temecula. Under his leadership, we were able to express our outrage that another Human Being was terminated in the cruelest of ways when it was not only unnecessary but apart of someone else's political agenda. Life is to be lived out not extinguished at the hands of another mortal. The Final Judgement of Our Good Deeds and Works is in the Hands of Almighty Jehovah. May The Holy Spirit have Mercy on Our Souls. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:35 PM To: Ana M Subject: RE: Mask Mandate Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl(a)tememlaca. qov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ana M < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:29 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Mask Mandate Good Evening, I am a 10 year resident in South Temecula and I have serious concerns regarding the leniency of face mask mandate. All though we have a low # of positive cases here in Temecula, we have lots of visitors and tourist that visit our town. Most positive cases are from the 92592 zip code. We currently have several popular businesses that have shut down due to an infected employee, this is a RED flag and we must do something about it, sooner than later or we will have to close everything down again and I certainly would not like to see that in our beautiful city. Masks must be Mandatory, we are continuing to re -act to COVID-19. We are not ahead of this disease. We all know that masks significantly contribute to reduce rates of infection, this is the easiest way we as a community can contribute to the safety of our fellow residents and visitors. I wear a_Mask in public for the following reasons: 1. 1 do not know if I have COVID-19, it is clear that people can spread the disease and not have symptoms. 2. 1 don't know if the person that is near me has a kid battling cancer or any underlaying medical conditions. An elderly mom/dad they care for. 3. 1 want our community to thrive again, business to stay open and employees to stay healthy. We all need to do our part. I know TEMECULA has Heart! A very concerned citizen Ana Moreno Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:13 PM To: Mike Mamian Subject: RE: 2 issues for tonights meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk ra ndi. johl(uotemeculacagov_ 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Mike Mamian < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:06 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: 2 issues for tonights meeting I wanted to reach out about two issues regarding our city. I have lived in Temecula for 16 years and voted in every local election. 1) 1 am wondering why our police department operated by the Riverside County Sherriff is not enforcing the mandated mask -wearing policy issued by the governor. I see all around town in stores people without masks. My wife is a high risk for COVID-19 and it is a disgrace that our sheriff will not even ticket or do any sort of enforcement of this policy. If my wife or any of my family gets sick, will they be willing to pay for the hospital bills? 2) 1 can not believe that after the previous mayor's comments about black people that not one councilmember went to Last week's Temecula Unity in the community meeting at the Old Town Blues Club. We need the leaders of our community to engage in these conversations to make our community stronger. Thank you for your time. Mike Mamian Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:14 PM To: Troy Chavez Subject: RE: Public Comment (6/23) Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johI(QtemecuIaca. qov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Troy Chavez < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:02 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment (6/23) Hello Randi, I hope you are doing well. See below for my public comment. "Hello, My name is Troy Chavez and I was raised in this town for as long as I could remember. I moved out for college, lived in Whittier (near LA) for six years and then moved back here. What I have seen transpire in the last few weeks made me realize that as a city, the council should stand up against the county sheriff's department and the well -funded police union that supports almost every member of the Riverside County Board of supervisors -- including Sheriff Chad Biacno, himself. We contract their services and have an option to raise concern about their methods/practices. We should not be afraid to demand reform. This county and city need more action than symbolic gestures. We should set up a committee to tackle this issue and fill it with a mix of community leaders and one or two council members. The committee should take a long hard look at what it needs from the county sheriffs and what the future of policing will look like for the city and the county. We can be a megaphone for change, no matter how small our city is. I am willing to be a part of the committee and help coordinate, if the council finds it prudent to create. Let's show the people of temecula that we care about everyone in the community, not just the ones shielded from police brutality. Thank you." Have a great day! I Warm regards, Troy Chavez ( Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:13 PM To: Amber Mamian Subject: RE: Concerned Community Member Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi,johl@temeculaca.goy 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Amber Mamian < June 23, 2020 1:09 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Concerned Community Member Dear Members of the Temecula City Council, My name is Amber Mamian and I am a president of Temecula (have been for the past 16 years). I have three major concerns right now. 1) The lack of enforcement in regards to regulations for wearing masks. I am disappointed by the lack of consideration for our elderly and those who are high risk let alone ALL of our safety when it comes to this pandemic. I have a cousin who is head of a USC hospital in LA and another who is the Head of Contact Tracing for California and I will hold the city responsible financially should I be infected be of the carelessness around the reinforcement of the regulations set in place by Governor Newsom. I have contacted Riverside Sherrif as well and have heard zero response. 2) As the parent of two black children, I am saddened by the attendance of last week's Temecula Unity event. In case you were not aware Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club last week. There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Councilperson Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. 3) The Trump EZ Up is selling merchandise on Winchester (near Margarita) and is not displaying a current sales permit. Why is this allowed? Are we going to allow vendors to sell random items up and down our city streets? I hope you take into consideration the importance of unity at this time. I urge you to consider the scope of the pandemic and the precautions that protect Temecula citizens, enforcement of our laws in regards to sales permits, and where we can conduct business, and I hope that council considers coming to future events put on by Temecula Unity. Sincerely, Amber Mamian Founder, Global Munchkins I CEO, Rookie Moms O, The Oprah Magazine Ambassador Two time Iris Award® Nominee www.GlobalMunchkins.com I www.RookieMoms.com U13213 Latest on Global Munchkins I Latest on Rookie Moms *REACHING OVER 6 MILLION MOMS EACH YEAR". Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:00 PM To: Jon C Subject: RE: City Council Comments Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jon C < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:54 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johI@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council Comments Dear Mayor Pro Temp Edwards, and honorable council members, A few days ago, Governor Newsom issued an order requiring everyone to wear face masks when in public to slow the spread or COVID-19. We have not seen a decrease in reported number of cases, in fact the number of new cases has been steadily increasing. Sheriff Chad Bianco has made it clear through his previous statements he will not enforce these orders. How will you safeguard our community from the rising numbers of COVID-19? This is another reason why I, and so many others want our own police department. The current head of our law enforcement agency does not hold the same values as those in our community. Additionally, we will be able to enact lifesaving practices and policies to the way we enforce our laws. Sincerely, Jonathan Chang 92592 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:52 PM To: Adam Subject: RE: Comments for City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Adam < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:50 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comments for City Council Meeting Honorable City Council Members, I am writing to because I am concerned about our city during the ongoing pandemic. I continue to see stories of places closing down because of a COVID 19 infection. The virus is obviously spreading in both our county and city. I see hospitalizations and ICU admissions on the rise as well. As a result of this, California has placed Riverside County on a watch list and issued a statewide face mask mandate. Several recent studies have shown the number one way we can currently slow the spread of the virus, and prevent future waves, is if everyone were to wear a face mask. I have seen comments suggesting the Sheriff's Department is failing to enforce the face mask mandate, and even not wearing masks themselves. I want to ask the city council to consider how to help enforce the mandate and help protect our community from the Coronavirus. I know some people are adamantly against the wearing of face masks, and am extremely disappointed this has become a political issue when it should be one of safety. I expect you may here form them how bad masks are and how we need to defy the mandate. I urge you not to listen to them and to listen to the experts that say masks can and will help stop the Coronavirus. I want you to know there are community members that want to see the mandate followed and enforced. Thank you for your time. V/R Adam Labotka Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:18 PM To: Jennee Arango Subject: RE: Public Comments Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jennee Arango < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:02 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comments Dear Mayor Pro Tem Edwards and Esteemed City Council Members As you know Riverside County COVID-19 numbers continue to rise steadily and have done so since the county rescinded the requirement to wear masks in public. A few days ago Governor Newsom reinstated the order requiring everyone to wear face masks when in public to slow the spread of COVID-19. Riverside County Sheriff Bianco publicly asserted that he will not enforce any orders requiring citizens to wear face masks. In light of this, how will you, those entrusted with keeping the citizens of Temecula safe, do so? How will you ensure that our town is not overrun with those who choose to ignore science, those who flout the governor's order, and those who selfishly show little regard for the safety of others? It is high time that Temecula considers enshrining its own police force, so that its citizens are not subject to the whims of, although duly elected to serve and protect the people of Riverside County, a sheriff who chooses not to safeguard those very same communities. Also, please update your website as the "Email All Council Members" still includes former Mayor Stewart's email address. I thank you for your time and efforts. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:19 PM To: Christopher Bout Subject: RE: For Public Comment 6/23 - Thank you Randi Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johI@temeculaca. gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Christopher Bout < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:01 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: For Public Comment 6/23 - Thank you Randi Hi Randi, I'd like a brief public comment to be read publicly into the record tonight. Good evening Mayor Pro-Tem, City Council, City Manager Adams, and staff. My name is Christopher Bout and I am a 20- year Temecula resident, and unlike dozens of public comment contributors at our last council meeting, I can prove it. In my professional life I work in the energy sector and serve municipal clients and participate in organizations for civic leaders. As such, I follow several cities with whom I am working with and attend virtual council meetings throughout the Inland Empire regularly. I can tell you with absolute certainty, because of the tone, wording style, syntax and structure that the flood of emotion -based, misinformed police -hating public comments given at our last meeting was a structured, concerted effort by a small focus group intent on proliferating a false ideological narrative designed to disrupt and ultimately destroy our current social constructs. That same group, with the same message, with the same letters, also flooded Hemet, Ontario, Riverside, Anaheim, Escondido, Menifee, and others. Please let your rational, mature, level- headed conscious prevail and to give these leftist hate mobs ZERO credibility or space in your collective psyches. They are the loudest because they are the fringe, so they must scream to be heard. They remaining 99% of the population, who just want to work hard for their families, love America and for all She stands for, who respect law -enforcement and do not condemn an entire industry by the actions of a few.... THOSE people were not screaming for some twisted reform. THOSE people are the majority, and THOSE good, law-abiding people are the interests that you should have in mind, NOT the interests of the outraged hate mobs who threatened to wreak havoc over Stew's speech -to -text mistake and who are currently seeking to destroy American cities, our country, our history, so they can transform America into some decrepit socialist utopia where everyday is the Summer of Love. I ask that you take Aaron Adams' invocation to heart, and pray for divine guidance as you select Stew's replacement. Thank you. Randi- please confirm receipt. Thank you! Chris Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:48 PM To: Tami Simms Subject: RE: Letter to be read into the record for general meeting 06/23/2020 Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with allachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Tami Simms < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:08 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Letter to be read into the record for general meeting 06/23/2020 Thank you Randi for all your hard work, we ALL appreciate you!!! Dear Mayor Pro Tem Edwards, and honorable council members, I am a 32 year resident of Temecula and I have serious concerns regarding the leniency of face mask mandate. A few days ago, Governor Newsom issued an order requiring everyone to wear face masks when in public to slow the spread or COVID-19. I have not seen an increase of local Temeculians conforming in fact several have made it clear that they will not comply. Seeing a statement from our Riverside sheriffs department even undermining the rule of law from the Governor, stating while on duty they will not wear masks is so infuriating. I'm sorry but when those expected to protect and serve do not comply to wear a mask, we need to change and get our own police force, how is that even possible??? We have not seen a decrease in reported number of cases, in fact the number of new cases has been steadily increasing. Sheriff Chad Bianco has made it clear through his previous statements he will not enforce these orders. How will you safeguard our community from the rising numbers of COVID-19? I know some people are adamantly against the wearing of face masks, and am extremely disappointed this has become a political issue when it should be one of Science and 1 Safety. We currently have several popular businesses that have shut down due to an infected employee, this is a RED flag and we must do something about it, sooner than later or we will have to close everything down again and I certainly would not like to see that in our beautiful city. We all know that masks significantly contribute to reducing rates of infection, this is the easiest way we as a community can contribute to the safety of our fellow residents and visitors. Masks must be Mandatory, we are continuing to re -act to COVID-19. We are not ahead of this disease. As Council members you are here to serve our community, I urge you to make masks mandatory for the safety of our community, this is what you were elected to do. Thank You, Tami Sims Temecula Resident 4 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 2:10 PM To: Spencer Szczygiel Subject: RE: Council Meeting Public Comment Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi johl uG7terrseculaca.goy 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Spencer Szczygiel < Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 10:24 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: RE: Council Meeting Public Comment Randi, please see below: As an operator of multiple restaurants in Old Town I urge Temecula to close down Front St. to vehicle traffic as planned. In the short term it will allow businesses to offer a safer environment by spreading out our dining rooms even further and expanding upon outdoor seating which is recognized as a safer environment. I understand that there are considerable logistical challenges with residential and vendor deliveries that would require thought and consideration, but the safety of our community should be our foremost priority. In many cities over the world pedestrian neighborhoods have been tremendous for local businesses within the district and for generating tourism dollars and revenue for the city. If this could serve as a potential trial for a permanent change, it would be worthwhile to explore the opportunity. I understand there are vocal businesses locally who would not take advantage of the allowance but I firmly believe if more foot traffic comes to Old Town as a whole, every business would stand to benefit regardless of whether they expand their seating. Spencer Szczygiel Director of Restaurant Operations S enter tvwiner mans ement.com www.tvwiner mans ement.com TEMECULA VALLEY WINERY MANAGEMENT From: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 6:14 PM To: Spencer Szczygiel < Subject: RE: Council Meeting Public Comment You're welcome to email me the comment to be read into the record pursuant to the notice on the front page of the attached agenda. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk rand i.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Spencer Szczygiel< Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 2:48 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.iohl temeculaca.gov> Subject: Council Meeting Public Comment Hello, 1 would like to make a public comment regarding the potential Old Town street closure for the meeting scheduled Tuesday June 23rd. I understand the meeting is virtual and I'll need to provide my comment in advance. Can you please guide me on the process? Thank you in advance for all your help. Spencer Szczygiel Director of Restaurant Operations Spencer@tvwinerymanagement.com www.tvwinecymanagement.com TEMECULA VALLEY WINERY MANAGEMENT Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:06 AM To: Robert Danko Subject: RE: Old Town Front Street Closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: Robert Danko < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 7:38 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Old Town Front Street Closure At the last City Council Meeting, the plan to temporarily close Front Street and allow restaurants to expand seating capacity by utilizing the sidewalk and part of the public street was presented, discussed and ultimately approved. The Plan as shown in the diagram presented at the Council meeting was well thought out and seemed to be fair to restaurants, residents and non -restaurant businesses. Based on the approved Plan, our business has applied for the necessary ABC permit and obtain the required insurance. We have also expended thousands of dollars to purchase the patio furniture and containment barriers per our submitted plan. What has changed? A few members of the public late to the party, or misconception regarding the temporary nature? This past week I have been asked about the closure by numerous individuals, and while there were some initial negative comments, once I explained the plan was only temporary and designed to assist the struggling restaurants, I found the support overwhelmingly positive. Again, what has changed in the last few days? As a family owned restaurant I can attest to the fact that limiting the occupancy of our business changes the financial model we have worked with for over five years. A restaurant runs on very thin margins compared to other types of businesses. Limiting our revenue opportunity by 50% while our fixed costs remain at 100% makes a profitable business become one that is doomed to fail. We were forced to close our doors for a significant part of 2020, and upon re- opening have experienced an increase in costs, lower sales and no relief from rent, utilities, or equipment loans. I was thankful the City listened to the business owners and came up with a fair and reasonable solution. The most important fact to survival of our business and most of the other restaurants is building up our sales back to normal as quickly as possible. With the social distancing requirements in place we need the extra space that was approved by the City. The public is willing to once again enjoy the Old Town district and wants to safely socialize. Since the March shut down there have been several abuses in Old Town such over -crowding, use of parking lots and alleys, and serving people in the streets. While this has not been widespread, it is an indication that reversing the City's approval of the Plan may lead to more abuse and disobedience of the CDC guidelines. I urge the members of the Council to continue with the approved plan as long as the occupancy of our local businesses are restricted. Sincerely, Robert Danko Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 11:06 AM To: Whitney Friedrich Subject: RE: Road Closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director 1 City Clerk randi.iohlC&temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Whitney Friedrich < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 11:05 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: Road Closure I am Whitney Friedrich, I own Arrow Beauty Collective, I am against closing the street. It will negatively affect my business. Thank you Whitney Friedrich ( Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:48 PM To: Mad Osin Subject: RE: Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk ra n d i . jo hl@te m ecu laca. g ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt From: Vlad Osin < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:43 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Hi, Please do not close a Old TownFront street. Thank you. Best Regards Vladimir Osinovskiy SilverFever 1 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:50 PM To: Taos Territorial Traders Subject: RE: Old Town front street . Closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.0ohICaMemecuIaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Taos Territorial Traders < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:49 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Old Town front street . Closure To whom it may concern. My name is David Lewis I am the owner of 28551 and 28561 Old Town front street Taos territorial traders I am against all closures of Old Town front street it will directly impact all retail businesses . Including my own businesses. Please boat against closing Old Town front street I am not for it as a business owner Put the money that you would use for street closure signs into better use for promoting Old Town is open for business as usual thank you David Lewis Taos. I am against street closures. Get Outlook for Android Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:01 PM To: Subject: RE: My business will be impacted severely Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl temeculaca.cL 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Creative Director < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:14 PM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.Qov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank temeculaca. ov>; Mike Naggar <mnaggar@citycouncil.org>; Maryann Edwards <Ma ann.Edwards cit councilor > Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant temeculaca. ov> Subject: My business will be impacted severely Hello Randi Concerns: My business will be Very impacted by road closures As a 7-year tenant in the Pen fold building (which is a building the back of front street), the Salon will greatly be impacted with the closure that was voted on June 9, with NO communication to ME or many of us in this building and many other businesses. To be quite honest, I am upset and very disappointed in the City Council to make such a huge decision on my behalf without any notice of such meetings on May 29, because we were closed due to the Covid and the City Council to have this on Agenda with no notice for our concerns and voices to be heard. This has to be the lowest form of sneakiness and betrayal by our city council. Will these business impacted be compensated? As a Salon owner — 20 percent of our cliental average over 65 of age (covid risk) and another 25 percent are local Temecula residents just wanting their hair done then back home because they dislike all the traffic and people always drinking. Of course never any parking which is always a constant struggle. This is a struggle for our elderly and a safety issue if they cannot park close up. Yes I would be impacted greatly without our clients. Another safety concern the temperatures is extremely high and in asphalt is a major concern for the elderly cliental this would not benefit to their health, safety and my business. I know I have always had many challenges with the parking, because it is always congested and not enough parking structures or parking on this side of front street. Many parking spots were taken away to build riverbed in the back. Sometimes our clients get so frustrated they reschedule and leave disappointment. We have been impacted by weddings not taking place as we specialize in Bridal hair and makeup for over 300 brides a yr. and blowouts for over 3000 clients so yes we are hurting tremendously too! Because of state board and CDC we have to comply in the New norms which no more than 10 ppl in the salon including stylist so a small salon is now running at maybe 35 percent capacity at the moment. So, I would like to know how closing down Front Street helps my business and many others who have other business than just eating and drinking! Most of us have been shut down 3 months with no revenue as oppose restaurants were open for take-outs. Some did better thru the Pandemic than when opened by 50 percent and receive the PPP to help them get through these difficult times. So now, the city continues to hurts smaller businesses that were a phase 3 without resources, parking, and no voice. I understand the need to help restaurants in our area and I would rather you spend the efforts in lifting the ban of reopening and focusing on more parking spaces. Mayor Stew had mentioned parking structures on this end of Front Street. Where the beer wine / farmers market now again another change unbeknown to us! I did watch the meeting on U-Tube as (Luke Watson) city Management straight left out any other business are going to be affected. And you mentioned that you tossed this ides it around in 3 weeks and Yes without hearing everyone's concerns. I have to say this was a very poorly thought up plan to accommodate only the restaurants owners and trying to execute this would be a disaster on all other business not in the restaurant business. This would close down many business and I hope those are not your intentions. We will be impacted severely if road closure continues. Sincerely, Brenda Schultz Thomas Edward Salon and Dry bar Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:26 PM To: Subject: FW: Front street closure would impact me Attachments: Hello Randi revise.docx Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.jahlOD-temecu laca-gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Creative Director < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:35 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Front street closure would impact me I have attempted different emails and keeps be sent back to me. I hope this goes thru and I would appreciate this being read city council tomorrow evening. Also please a response if you receive this one. Thankyou Brenda Schultz Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone Hello Randi Concerns: My business will be Very impacted by road closures As a 7-year tenant in the Pen fold building (which is a building the back of front street), the Salon will greatly be impacted with the closure that was voted on June 9, with NO communication to ME or many of us in this building and many other businesses. To be quite honest, I am upset and very disappointed in the City Council to make such a huge decision on my behalf without any notice of such meetings on May 29, because we were closed due to the Covid and the City Council to have this on Agenda with no notice for our concerns and voices to be heard. This has to be the lowest form of sneakiness and betrayal by our city council. Will these business impacted be compensated? As a Salon owner — 20 percent of our cliental average over 65 of age (covid risk) and another 25 percent are local Temecula residents just wanting their hair done then back home because they dislike all the traffic and people always drinking. Of course never any parking which is always a constant struggle. This is a struggle for our elderly and a safety issue if they cannot park close up. Yes I would be impacted greatly without our clients. Another safety concern the temperatures is extremely high and in asphalt is a major concern for the elderly cliental this would not benefit to their health, safety and my business. I know I have always had many challenges with the parking, because it is always congested and not enough parking structures or parking on this side of front street. Many parking spots were taken away to build riverbed in the back. Sometimes our clients get so frustrated they reschedule and leave disappointment. We have been impacted by weddings not taking place as we specialize in Bridal hair and makeup for over 300 brides a yr. and blowouts for over 3000 clients so yes we are hurting tremendously too! Because of state board and CDC we have to comply in the New norms which no more than 10 ppl in the salon including stylist so a small salon is now running at maybe 35 percent capacity at the moment. So, I would like to know how closing down Front Street helps my business and many others who have other business than just eating and drinking! Most of us have been shut down 3 months with no revenue as oppose restaurants were open for take- outs. Some did better thru the Pandemic than when opened by 50 percent and receive the PPP to help them get through these difficult times. So now, the city continues to hurts smaller businesses that were a phase 3 without resources, parking, and no voice. I understand the need to help restaurants in our area and I would rather you spend the efforts in lifting the ban of reopening and focusing on more parking spaces. Mayor Stew had mentioned parking structures on this end of Front Street. Where the beer wine / farmers market now again another change unbeknown to us! I did watch the meeting on U-Tube as (Luke Watson) city Management straight left out any other business are going to be affected. And you mentioned that you tossed this ides it around in 3 weeks and Yes without hearing everyone's concerns. I have to say this was a very poorly thought up plan to accommodate only the restaurants owners and trying to execute this would be a disaster on all other business not in the restaurant business. This would close down many business and I hope those are not your intentions. We will be impacted severely if road closure continues. Sincerely, Brenda Schultz Thomas Edward Salon and Dry bar Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:58 PM To: Subject: RE: Old Town Front Street Closing for resturants Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohlCa7temeculaca.,gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Paul Babb < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:51 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johI@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council.assistant@temecula.gov Subject: Old Town Front Street Closing for resturants Cheryl's Antiques This would have a negative impact on my Business. Parking, foot traffic, flow of traffic, clean streets. People drinking, cost of insurance, lack of security. Loss of biker traffic. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:59 PM To: Liliya Osinovskaya Subject: RE: Request To reverse decision of close Old Town Front Street closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl a temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Liliya Osinovskaya < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:37 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: FW: Request To reverse decision of close Old Town Front Street closure Dear members of Temecula City Council We ask you to help all brick and mortar businesses in Old Town district, revisit the above -specified decision and correct it. Road closure affects walking and driving traffic, and any limitation of visitors will affect negatively the already struggling community of local businesses. I work our Temecula location regularly and I can tell you for certain that your decision to close will have a negative effect on all stores and businesses, which, obviously, will negatively affect the taxes that we bring to the City on regular basis. Any type of construction work or road limits is a negative effect, we all felt that last year when the sidewalk was changing. The road closure will have only a deeper negative impact. We always count on the support of the city. Please note that I am just one voice above many, all the stores and many restaurants voiced numerous concerns. Thank You, LGCG(Jia 0--i ov--k6llJia, Senior Buyer Silver Fever LLC www.silverfever.com Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:58 PM To: Letty Marquez Subject: RE: CLOSURE OF OLD TOWN STREET Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi iohl(a)-necuiaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Letty Marquez < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:44 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: CLOSURE OF OLD TOWN STREET Good afternoon Mr. Randi, I'm writing to express opposition to the closing of streets in Temecula Old Town. I believe that the job of our council members is to protect all business and not just few. Having a business in Temecula is expensive, rents along can take a lot from a business to be able to run, if they apply for the PPP grant, funds run out for most of them already, the city/county only offer one grant so I invite you to please put yourself in the shoes of many of these small business who many have older clients and unable to walk. Why hurt these small businesses any more than they've already been impacted? It seems completely unnecessary if this is an effort to control the spread of Covid-19. The CDC has already issued information that the virus doesn't spread from surface contact. If the issue is crowds not maintaining social distancing, or wearing masks, then why not police that? Set up a volunteer/senior police 'ambassadors' to do it. I pray you and everyone at the city decision making team realized that this is not the best strategy to help small businesses strive and survived Covid19 after been close for so long. Have a blessed day, Lefty A. Marquez, EA CLSA-NP/Tax Advisor MVP Notary and Tax Services 43180 Business Park Dr. Ste 103 Temecula, CA 92590 http://Mvpnotai3Landtax.com FAX 866-723-5859 "Lord grant me the strength to change the things I can, the ability to accept the things I can't, and the wisdom to know the difference between the two. "- Serenity Prayer - This e-mail and any attachment is intended for the above named and/or intended recipient(s) only, and may contain confidential information. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender of the miscommunication and delete the message. Failure to maintain the confidentiality of this e-mail and any attachment may subject you to penalties under applicable law. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:58 PM To: Ed Dool Subject: RE: TEMECULA STAGE STOP ( OLD TOWN FRONT STREET CLOSURE) Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohlCr temecuiac__ a,gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ed Dool < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:49 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Rinku patel <rinkurox310@yahoo.com> Subject: TEMECULA STAGE STOP ( OLD TOWN FRONT STREET CLOSURE ) This is Ed Dool, representing five business and owns of The Temecula Stage Stop 28464 Old Town Front St. we would like Old Town Front St.to be OPEN and would like to thank the City for there time and effort for giving Old Town 90 more parking spaces and fixing the alleys. Edward Dool Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:59 PM To: Carol Rocha Subject: RE: Old Town Street Closures Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohl ri temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Carol Rocha < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:11 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Old Town Street Closures Importance: High I'm writing to express opposition to the closing of streets in Temecula Old Town. Why hurt these small businesses any more than they've already been impacted? It seems completely unnecessary if this is an effort to control the spread of Covid-19. The CDC has already issued information that the virus doesn't spread from surface contact. If the issue is crowds not maintaining social distancing, or wearing masks, then why not police that? Set up a volunteer/senior police 'ambassadors' committee to do it. These are difficult times for all of us. Please don't cut off our nose to spite our face. Carol A. Rocha Haute Inspirations www.hauteinspirations.com ( Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:20 PM To: Subject: RE: Old Town Temecula Road Closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 4:48 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Old Town Temecula Road Closure Hello my name is Leslie Kavanagh and I am the owner of The Katwalk Boutique in old town Temecula. I have been at my location for 10 years. I adamantly oppose any closure of Front Street to compensate for the few restaurants versus all of the small businesses in the area. Such closure would be a huge detriment and financial loss for most businesses. Parking is already very limited. Closures such as the Rod Run, the holiday parade, etc. have caused a huge loss in income as well but I have never complained about these closures as they draw a lot of a attention & exposure to Temecula and are for a very limited period. The only compromise I can see is to close the designated blocks after small businesses close at 6:00 until midnight and only on Friday and Saturday. Most businesses don't get a huge lunch or dinner crowd during the week. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Leslie Kavanagh Sent frorn AOL Mobile Mail Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.00m Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:20 PM To: Rene ehmcke Subject: RE: revised letter from The Gambling Cowboy & Rene's Cowgirl Cantina Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randijohl(a)tein@�culaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Rene ehmcke < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 4:22 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: revised letter from The Gambling Cowboy & Rene's Cowgirl Cantina Hi, I am Rene Ehmcke , speaking along with Bill and Nltza Ehmcke , owners of both The Gambling Cowboy Chophouse and Rene's Cowgirl Cantina located on the corners of fifth and front in Old Town Temecula. First, we would like to thank Luke Watson for all his efforts and helping us to clear up the concerns we have around fifth street with parking, deliveries etc. and the proposed cjosure of Front Street. The original proposal of closing down the street seemed like a great idea and a way to allow the businesses to expand to help increase revenue with the capacity challenges we've been facing as small businesses trying to survive. However, now that many of the restrictions have been lifted , with just a drive through Old Town it's apparent that all the businesses seem to be getting back to speed, we think the closing of Front Street isn't as necessary as once thought. Parking is still a major issue and getting our guests as close to their destinations should be our concern. Perhaps a compromise of every Thursday from 5- 10pm with a Farmer's Market, Street Faire kind of atmosphere with Downtown businesses sharing their wares would satisfy both sides of the issue. For The Gambling Cowboy, and Rene's Cowgirl Cantina it just doesn't seem necessary at this time for "indefinite" street closures, especially with the recent closings of 2 Downtown Restaurants due to Covid 19. Thank you for your consideration. From: Rene ehmcke Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:25 PM To: Randi.Johl@temeculaca.g_v <Randi.Johl temeculaca. ov> Subject: Old Town Front Street Closure Hi, I am Rene Ehmcke , speaking along with Bill and Nltza Ehmcke , owners of both The Gambling Cowboy Chophouse and Rene's Cowgirl Cantina located on the corners of fifth and front in Old Town Temecula. First, we would like to thank Luke Watson for all his efforts and helping us to clear up the concerns we have around fifth street with parking, deliveries etc. and the proposed closure of Front Street. The original proposal of closing down the street seemed like a great idea and a way to allow the businesses to expand to help increase revenue with the capacity challenges we've been facing as small businesses trying to survive. However, now that many of the restrictions have been lifted , with just a drive through Old Town it's apparent that all the businesses seem to be getting back to speed, we think the closing of Front Street isn't as necessary as once thought. Parking is still a major issue and getting our guests as close to their destinations should be our concern. Perhaps a compromise of every Thursday from 5- 10pm with a Farmer's Market, Street Faire kind of atmosphere with Downtown businesses sharing their wares would satisfy both sides of the issue. For The Gambling Cowboy, and Rene's Cowgirl Cantina it just doesn't seem necessary at this time. :�°'. Virus -free. www.avast.com Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:26 PM To: Jackie Acosta Subject: RE: Old Town street closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl(o)temeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jackie Acosta < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:02 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Old Town street closure I am a salon owner at Hair & Co., Inc. by the corner of Front and Main. I feel the closure would affect my clients tremendously. It would increase the likelihood of not being able to find a parking space for my clients, which will drive them to search for another business that doesn't have parking issues. Not having adequate parking for my elderly clients is just inconsiderate. They need to park close to my location because some of them can't walk that far. I feel the street closure is only catering to restaurants with no respect to the rest of us small businesses, who are still trying to recover from the shutdown. Economically, it will impact my business a lot, and not in a positive way. Thank you, Jackie Acosta Owner Hair & Co., Inc. 42031 Main St. Ste. E Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM To: Neeru Sehgal Subject: RE: closer of roads in old town temecula Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohl(iNemeculaces,gay 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Neeru Sehgal < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:28 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: closer of roads in old town temecula Hi Randi, I heard you were the person to email regarding the road closer in old town front street. I am writing to that this is not a good Idea since there are a lot of other business in old town and not just restaurants that are hurting and shutting down the main street is going to be hurting those businesses also. As it is parking is tough in old town by shutting the roads lot of people are going to stop coming - I go into old town to pick up things and food and Will try to avoid that area if I have to walk 3 to 4 blocks to pickup the food or make deliveries. Even elderly people will stop going there as it is too far to walk. Please reconsider this as it is not feasible to everyone. Thanks NEERU SEHGAL SUNIL SETHI REAL ESTATE Realtor, Notary, Property Manager Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM To: Subject: RE: Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi. iohI@temecuIaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:39 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: To M. Randi Johl and the Temecula City Council: I am Sylvia Paulsen, owner of The Gardener's Cottage on Front Street since 2012. I have seen the affect of street closures on our daily sales numbers throughout the years. The impact is always negative. In spite of this, I have never expressed opposition to activities that build community spirit and bring traffic to the town. This is different. The proposal that a few restaurants can expand their access into the street causing blockage for everyone else is unfair to the majority of the businesses on the street. We all rely on abundant parking and free flow of traffic throughout Old Town for the survival of our stores. In the past two years, between the recent laying of updated sidewalks, installation of new sewer lines, widening of the flood control, and nearby large construction projects, all good but lengthy improvements, we have experienced innumerable interruptions to traffic access and parking for our customers, to the significant hardship of our bottom line. COVID-19 shutdowns and restrictions have of course added many further burdens to our family businesses. We need solutions that benefit all of Old Town. I am adamantly opposed to any activity that would block street access, for the benefit of a few and the detriment of everyone else. Sylvia Paulsen The Gardener's Cottage, Inc. 28465 Old Town Front Street #101 Temecula, CA 92590 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:26 PM To: michael Subject: RE: street closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randijohl(&temeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: michael < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:46 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: street closure This needs to be reconsidered my business Old Town Antique Faire is not going to benefit one bit form this, my older customer base will not hike down from the parking garage to my business which they have already informed me. Maybe consider closing a side street or do some kind of study on this matter. Try including the other merchants not just a couple of restaurants my business has been here since 1987 and it has and still is a draw for this town. thanks Michael Freville Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:28 PM To: Randy Subject: RE: Front street closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: Randy < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:03 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Front street closure Hi this is Ken Rauton from the Swing Inn Cafe, I have been operating on this corner for 45 years and can unequivocally tell you that closing front street is a bad idea. We as merchants have been through enough in the past 3 months and most of us are just now getting back the business we lost due to Covid-19. The time for an experimental "new old town" is not now, we have had 100% of our customers express they will do business elsewhere if the road closes. Just as we have gotten them back, the decision of the council is threatening to take them away. The logistics alone warrant this idea to be scrapped, a 40 foot tractor trailer in old town on 3rd street delivering food to us or another restaurant how does he turn around and get out. These are the issues we would face daily. And if we would have been properly notified of this idea the city council could have saved a tremendous amount of time and money if you would have taken the time to listen to the merchants. Ken Rauton Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:28 PM To: Subject: RE: Old Town Street Closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Richard Leigh < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:03 PM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn TemeculaCA. ov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann_.Ed_w_ arils@citycouncil.or >; Mike Naggar <m n aRga r@ cityco unci I, o rg> Cc: Luke Watson <luke.watson@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Old Town Street Closure Hello Council Members, We wanted to share our continued support of the City's plan to close part of Front Street to allow for expanded retail and restaurants on the sidewalks and parking spaces. A vast majority of the negative feedback has been north of 4th Street. The City has addressed that feedback by shortening the closure to south of 4th Street. The access to their parking lots and street parking will no longer be impacted. Claims that parking will be negatively affected is not accurate. The City has added more spaces than will be removed by the closure. Claims that the closure will decrease social distancing is also inaccurate. The closure creates more space for walking and more space for businesses, which encourages social distancing. Please note that the OTTA does not represent the whole of Old Town. In fact, they do not represent some of the largest employers in Old Town. Also, keep in mind that some of their members are also in favor of the closure. Most importantly, the decision to allow businesses to expand directly affects our ability to generate sales and in -turn keep valuable staff. The street expansion allows for a win -win situation. Restaurants and retail will have the ability to social distance and have enough space for customers to get close to pre-covid sales. In regards to 1909 specifically, the expansion gets us close to the seating we once had. It will be impossible to keep our entire staff if we are stuck at 50% capacity. Some of the feedback that we have heard is that business is "fine" since reopening. Many of these businesses have not been affected because they are not following the State's guidelines. Please give the businesses, and their employees, a chance to do the right thing AND stay in business. Please keep in mind that there is support for the program, in the form of applicants. And many shared their support during the last public hearing. I hope their voice is not lost this week. I also believe that many will join us, on the street, when the existing applicants prove that it is a worthwhile investment. It is universally understood that this is a temporary expansion. Nobody, including myself, can say that this will be perfect for Old Town or not. This is not a new idea. It has been proven in countless cities worldwide. But let's give it a chance and see if it is great. There couldn't be a more appropriate time to try out this concept. I urge the council to consider all the facts before making a decision to cancel the project. Many businesses have invested much time and money into preparing for the expansion. I have seen many of the plans, of the applicants, and can honestly say that they are well thought out and well designed. I believe it will be a great draw to Old Town. Thankyou Ricky Leigh 1909 Restaurant Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:30 PM To: Main Street Salon Subject: RE: Road closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi johl0NtemecuIaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Main Street Salon < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:14 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Road closure My name is Michael Lisa Kavanagh, I own Main Street Salon on Main Street. I am against the road closure of front street. I have already lost patrons do the article published about the street closures. My clients have stated that parking is already difficult enough and will be finding a salon elsewhere so they don't have to deal with the new road closure. I urge you to vote against the street closure to help old town businesses and not just a few restaurants, especially seeing has how 1909 already had to close down again due to a positive covid test. Thank you for your time Michael Lisa Kavanagh Main Street Salon Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:50 AM To: Mechel Marcucci Subject: RE: Front Street Closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi. johI(cDtemecuIaca.9ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Mechel Marcucci <mechel. Monday, June 22, 2020 7:17 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Front Street Closure I am aware of the decision to close Old Town in some areas to help restaurants and vendors rebuild business (June 24th)/ My concern is what happens to other businesses that are not on that end of town? As you know parking is at a premium. The employees on 5th St. all ready have difficulty parking to get to work on time and to assist our clientele. Will there be any parking assigned for 5th St. businesses? We have restaurants,retail,antique store,hair salons,candy store, cheese shop ,cupcake store and more. Myself included. We all would have appreciated more time and information before the decision was made for us. We all hope we are considered in your final decision. RepectfullX Mechel Marcucci Travel Consultant Office: All prices subject to change until booked and paid in full. Flight reservations placed on hold will cancel within 24 hours. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:49 AM To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery Subject: RE: No Street Closures Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk ra ndi.johl(a)temeculaca. aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Thomas Kinkade -gallery < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 10:30 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fw: No Street Closures For the City Council meeting regarding street closures, please see below from mad madeline's. Thomas Kinkade at Old Town 28545 Old Town Front St. Suite # 103 Temecula, CA 92590 ( ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Sid Hamilton < To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020, 08:51:18 PM PDT Subject: Fwd: No Street Closures Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Date: June 22, 2020 at 5:16:33 PM PDT To: "<Council.assistant temecula. ov>" <Council. assistant(o)TemecuIa. gov>, "<Randi.Johl(temecula.gov>" <Randi.Johl __Temecula.aov> Cc: Subject: No Street Closures Hi, I am writing this on behalf of Sidney Hamilton. Sid owns Mad Madeline's Grill. He is against closing the street because it will negatively affect his business. Please let us know if there are any updates on this issue. Thank you Have a Great Day! Christina Reynolds -Hamilton Mad Madeline's Grill, Inc. 28495 Old Town Front Street 4A Temecula, Calif. 92590 .goo % Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:49 AM To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery Subject: RE: For the City Council meeting - Front Street Closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi joh O)temeculaca.goy 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Thomas Kinkade -gallery < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 10:35 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: For the City Council meeting - Front Street Closure TITO look forward to my comments being read in their entirety for the record. City Council has been ignoring my emails, and this is the only way to be heard. Also, we were given an incorrect email address for you, so I wanted to confirm you received emails from Taos Traders, Vintage Begonia, Katwalk, Arrow Beauty, Silver Fever, Cheryl's Antiques, The Little Viking, Gardeners Cottage, and Thomas Edward Salon. I have forwarded you the email from Mad Madeline's. From Jerry at Thomas Kinkade Gallery City Council — I Here is the timeline of events... 6/13 Saturday - I emailed City Council and other elected officials regarding the street closures, when it was publicized in myvalley news. 6/15 Monday - Businesses were then told on Monday June 16th the street closure has been cancelled; which I emailed for confirmation and was told by Luke Watson was incorrect, it was simply delayed until Wednesday June 24th 6/16 Tuesday - I emailed again regarding parking constraints, delivery issues; and the previous closures due to sidewalks being replaced, protestors, and COVID closures and quarantines. 6/17 Wednesday - An article came out in myvalleynews, publicizing the plan; meeting with Luke Watson 20+ business owners at Mad Madeline's, where he told us City Council had voted for the street closure and it was a done deal. I called and left messages for Zak and MaryAnn, and additional emails. No response. emailed specifically asking for the list of 60-70 restaurant owners at the private meeting where they voted for closed the street, mentioned in the City Council meeting on 6/9. No response or list of those owners. I brought up that at the 6/9 meeting , they only read four comments that were read in support of closing the street; two were from former chamber of commerce members, one was a business owner whose business is NOT in Old Town, and the other was from a city resident. NONE were from actual Old Town business owners. Received a response from Mike Naggar saying the council had done their outreach, made their decision, and he said you email everyone on the council, it is hard for them to respond 6/18 - response from Zak they are taking our concerns seriously, I responded this matter was urgent and could not wait to be corrected, since they kept publicizing the plan of the street closures on the pe, myvalleynews, and temeculapatch. 6/22 Monday small businesses received notice from the OTTA on Monday 6/22 that we needed to submit our comments individually to the city council by 6/23 Tuesday for the meeting, despite us already sending multiple emails as a group. The email address they provided was incorrect. Multiple business owners received bounce back emails that their email was undeliverable. What about this plan does City Council feel was handled correctly? This initiative supposedly came from a private meeting of 60-70 restaurant owners. We have asked for the names of those owners in attendance and have yet to receive them. They supposedly voted based on those 60-70 restaurant owners but they feel ignoring emails from 20+ small business owners in Old Town was appropriate? Despite 10 days of emails, we were given 24 hours to voice our concerns and an incorrect email address to submit them to? z My concern stated in all original emails I sent.... The original plan was not publicized as it should have been. Business owners in Old Town were not consulted. This plan is a very narrow, short sighted view, when you consider how many restaurants one visitor can patronize. Any visitor, at max, visits two restaurants. Most diners come specifically for dinner, after the wineries close, and all the retail shops are closed for the day. No other city or shopping district has closed their streets indefinitely, with no end date. There is no precedence or justification for this. By closing the street to allow people to take over the street, it will become a swap meet environment with open containers. That does not appeal to the Old Town customers that we currently service. You cannot close Front Street for parking or through traffic. We just got over the city closing the sidewalk to remove the wood plank side walk - which also reduced parking, protestors marching down Front Street which forced us to close early due to curfew, and that is in addition to being closed for COVID quarantine. The solution here is not to further restrict access to Front Street, when all we have been dealing with is Front Street restrictions. Closing the streets to parking will make pickup of purchases and deliveries from UPS and Fedex impossible, and a lack parking will discourage people and make them go elsewhere. The plan does not replace all lost spaces. The current plan of closing three blocks is a loss of approximately 75 parking spaces. The message from the city needs to be Old Town is OPEN, there is parking, come visit. Thomas Kinkade at Old Town 28545 Old Town Front St. Suite # 103 Temecula, CA 92590 ( 3 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:38 AM To: Subject: RE: Street closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 -----Original Message ----- From: REBECCA WALTON < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:56 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Street closure I am completely AGAINST closing OLD TOWN FRONT STREET My customers are older - many 50 and up or with younger children plus I have many staff that cannot find parking now. Deliveries are Already a nightmare. I see no benefit to street closure. We are able to practice social distancing with NO problem. Seating guests 6 feet apart - - and wait listing them as necessary. All staff wear masks and are temp checked. Thank you. Rebecca Walton Texas Lils Mesquite Grill 32 years in business Sent from my Phone 1 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:39 AM To: Subject: RE: Small business owner in Old Town Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk rand iJohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Luke Watson <luke.watson@temeculaca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:16 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: Small business owner in Old Town .� Verified City Account; Comments for Old Town item tonight. Luke Watson Director of Community Development City of Temecula (951) 694-6415 I u ke. watso n Co)Te m ecu la CA.gov From: Megan Maclntyre < Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:26:28 PM To: Luisa Tovar <luisa.tovar temeculaca. ov> Cc: Luke Watson <luke.watson temeculaca. ov> Subject: Small business owner in Old Town Hello Council Members, It has been brought to my attention that there could potentially be a delay or cancellation in the Old Town Front Street project, and I just wanted to share my opinion on the matter. I am a fairly new business in Old Town (Under the Willow, where we just hit our 1 year mark In May), but have multiple I businesses in Carlsbad Village, CA. We are following every single practice set forth by CDC, as well as every retail best practice we have researched during this unique time. It has been challenging to keep things afloat, but I'm doing everything in my power to stay positive, and make sure we are adapting to anything and everything that has been thrown at us. We have removed fixtures, added sanitizing stations, and spread out everything in the store so that social distancing is 100% compliant. When I heard about the expansion, I immediately planned out next steps with my contractor to ensure we have a beautiful addition to the front, that does not reflect a temporary addition due to high standards and visual excellence. We have purchased the supplies, and scheduled the addition to take place this Friday and Saturday, so that we can open the expansion to the public on Sunday. We have been sharing this info with all of our customers, and everyone is thrilled to see the new curated space. My employee schedule for next week allows me to add 3-4 shifts each day (5-6 on weekends) for the additional space, which will make a huge difference in my staff's ability to receive their regular hours pre-covid. I would ask you to reconsider this delay/cancellation, and allow us to give this a try while social distancing is still so important in our everyday business. It would be a huge blessing to those of us who have closely followed the rules, and kept maximum capacity a huge priority during this time. Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions! Megan Maclntyre President/CEO Under the Willow Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:38 AM To: Subject: FW: Old Town Restaurant/Retail Expansion Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk ra ndi. iohlCa7temeculaca. gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 s• r� Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Begin forwarded message: From: "Chris O'Neill" < Subject: Old Town RestauranVRetail Expansion Date: June 23, 2020 at 8:55:33 AM PDT To: matt.rahnCtc7citycouncil.org mna. Iar@citycouncil.org, zak.schwankCa3.temeculaca.gov, m a rya n n. edwa rds()-citycou n ci I. oM Please excuse me if I have missed some council members email addresses... To the Temecula City Council, In advance of tonight's upcoming meeting, I would like to get my opinion on the record regarding my support for the street closure and Old Town restaurant and retail expansion. While Old Town itself is already a viable tourist destination, it is much less desirable to tourists and locals alike when dining establishments are either closed or limited in capacity. I have seen firsthand the dip in business when one or two popular restaurants are closed in Old Town. While it is difficult to gauge exact numbers and causation factors during a pandemic, I can attest to at least a 10% reduction in business when popular restaurants are not open or operating with limitations. The two weeks before Father's Day have historically been two of our busiest weeks at Temecula House of Jerky. This year our numbers were actually on a par with last year until 1909 and Luke's had to close down due to Covid-19 protecals. Based on the previous week and last year's numbers, that cost us a 20% reduction in business as people were not travelling to Old Town to eat. This also meant less foot traffic as diners typically visit the many local retail establishments while waiting for a table or deciding where to eat. While many retail owners may not see dining establishments as an important factor in their businesses, I truly believe many of these businesses would be in dire straits if it wasn't for the traffic these restaurants generate in Old Town. It is with this understanding that I support any ideas or initiatives to help our local restaurants at this time. Allowing them to increase their outdoor dining capacity is not only good for business as a whole in Old Town, it is also many times safer for our population during this pandemic. I have spoken with many business owners in Little Italy San Diego about their recent "al fresco" dining weekend and they got nothing but positive reviews from their customers. It was seen as something new and exciting to their customers while also allowing these businesses to increase sales in their effort to stay afloat during this difficult time. Old Town Temecula House of Jerky would welcome the street closure, as it would decrease the multiple speeding cars and motorcycles that use Old Town Front Street as a bypass for traffic on the 15 freeway. This increased vehicular traffic does not help my business, it most likely hurts it. The increased number of parking spaces will be a huge positive, as will the increased area for customers to walk, shop, and dine in areas where Old Town Front Street is closed. In terms of size, my store is probably the smallest in all of Old Town Temecula. While we have been in our location since 1995, our sales have suffered due to the need to socially distance. While normally we could pack our store with customers and welcome the additional business, we now can only allow one family or group into the store at a time to ensure social distancing. While some customers will wait outside until the group in front of them finishes their purchase and leaves, many will simply walk away. This is a huge detriment on the busy weekends, which allowing the expansion of retail onto the street will drastically help. With this plan, we can now sell outside and inside in a Covid compliant manner that keeps our customers and employees safe while not adversely affecting sales. I see nothing but positives for this plan and support it. I know many other business owners who think it is a good idea that could increase business. I am positive it will, as it has in many other cities across the country. Thank you for your time and consideration. Chris O'Neill Old Town Temecula House of Jerky TemeculaHouseOfJerk .com 28655 Old Town Front Street Temecula, CA 92590 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:37 AM To: Olivedipity Subject: RE: Old Town Closures Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi .'ohl@temeculaca..clov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Olivedipity < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:18 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Old Town Closures Hi Randi, We don't agree with shutting down the streets to add restaurant tables. We feel it is hard enough for visitors to find parking and it will look like we are under construction. Not to mention the delivery trucks that already block off streets and have a hard time getting through. I was told by Luke that we would have to have the trucks deliver in AM and it would not be a problem —but, that is a problem. Delivery trucks give you a window. For instance, I do request AM deliveries but, my window is 9-11 yesterday my truck showed up at 1:00pm. I realize my building is not in direct effect of this but, it is going to work against other business. Perhaps if the streets were blocked off around 5/6pm then it would assist the restaurants and not effect other retailers as much. We also don't feel it's good enough to close down this much when only a few restaurants are participating. It will be an open space for people to gather and hang out instead of social distancing, shopping and eating. Regardless of the time of blocking the streets off - you would be taking away handicap parking and making it extremely hard for customers to be dropped off at a location and for customers to pick up large or heavy purchases. When, after retail hours it makes it more of a win win.. Thank you for your time, Mike and Nicole Kelleher Get Outlook for iOS Get Outlook for iOS Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM To: Gillian Larson Subject: FW: Public comment request for 6/23/2020 Attachments: Public Comment street closure in Old Town for pedestrians only.docx Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohl atemecu}aca. cl ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Gillian Larson < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 202010:42 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment request for 6/23/2020 Hi Randi I have attached my public comment for this evening regarding pedestrian dining in Old Town. Hope it fits the 3 minutes. The links are just a reference to so much found in Google on this issue all over the country, links not to be read in the comment. Thanks Hope you are doing OK and you and your family are well Stay safe and well Gillian Reality Rally Thank My T.E.D talk. My S.U.E Talk Creator and Event Producer, President Reality Rally Inc www.realit rall .com Please sign up for our News Updates Reality Rally Thank you Follow us on facebook.com/realityrally Twitter @realityrally IG @realityrally CBS Survivor Reality Star Gillian Sizzle Reel https://www.youtube.comlwatch?v=Hr6Yr)FMwu-c For several years as Old Town has got busier and noisier, many have thought closing an area of Front street to traffic and making it pedestrian only would be a great idea. Temecula now has an opportunity and reason to do so and what a perfect trial period to benefit many and to see how valuable it could be in the future. Cities across the country are closing down town streets for Al Fresco dining. There are endless articles when googled. At the end of my comments there are 13 links, a few I had time to find not to be read but to show this is happening all over the country Benefits. • Increase patronage to restaurants with Covid spread safer dining opportunities. • It could be a draw for tourism if Temecula leads the way with pedestrian Old Town Al Fresco dining ■ Traffic safety and noise is a big drawback and would improve so people in general and with children and strollers more likely to frequent outdoor dining establishments now and in the future. • Long term this pedestrian area could be a beautified center point like many other cities have. I am sure the City task force leading this plan has given consideration to all possible drawbacks to make accommodations and will do so as others may arise Adequate signage Parking concerns Need for shade Access for residents Alcohol licensing Interestingly, the very popular Al Fresco dining in Europe was introduced due to the Spanish Flu of 1918 Thank you. Gillian Larson htt s: westchesterma azine.com coronavirus-covid-19-westchester eekskil1-croton- orktown- outdoor-dinin htt s: mv-voice.com news 2020 O6 22 no-cars-in-si ht-castro-street-closed-to-traffic-for-outdoor- dinin htt s: www.mv-voice.com news 202O O5 13 ever -seat-outside-would-hel -cities-consider-closin streets-to-traffic-to-make-s ace-for-stru lin - restaurants?utm cam ai n=ma net&utm source=article a e&utm medium=related articles https://www.washingtoUost.coml https://www.latimes.com/caIifornia/story/2020-05-19/iong-beach-m u IIs-opening-streets-for-dining- and-recreation https://www.Presshera Id.com/2020105/12/portia nd-floats-closing-downtown-streets-for-open-air- dining-retail htt s: www,usatoday.com/sto[y/money/2020/05/2 1coronavirus-reo enin -restaurants-outdoor- dining-streets-sidewalks-pa rking-lots/5217156002/ https://www.scpr.org/propra ms/airta Ik/2020/05120165639/socaI-cities-look-to-street-closures-to- expand-out/ https://www. statesm a n io u rna l.co m/st❑ ry/I ifelfoo d/2020/06/18/dow ntown-sa lem-resta u ra nts- outdoor-d ining-reotaening-oreeon-businesses153311120021 https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2020/05/14/dining-city-exploring-options-for-closing-streets-for-din_ ing� https:l/thecounter.org/covid-19-street-dining-tam pa-cincinnati-new-york/ https://www.biz'ourna Is.com/pittsburphZnews/2020/061221downtown-restaurants-outdoor-seating= expansion.html https://ny.eater.com/2020/5/6/21248077/restaurant-reopening-strategy-coronavirus-nyc-laws Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM To: Subject: RE: Old Town Street Closure Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk raridiiohl temec-L laca..gav 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Begin forwarded message: From: Andrew Doty < Subject: Fwd: Old Town Street Closure Date: June 22, 2020 at 5:29:19 PM PDT To: zak.schwank temeculaca. ov, "james. stewart" <'ames.stewart cit councilor >, Matt.Rahn cit councilor , maryann.edwards cr.citycouncil.org, mnaggar@citycouncil.org, Luke Watson <Iuke,watson@TemeculaGA.gvv> Cc: Richard Leigh < , Ricky Leigh < , Amanda Lane < , Bill Steinkirchner < , Kimberly Adams< Kelleher <Jkelliher all of you at Temecula City Hall.: This is for the hearing tomorrow evening JUNE 23rd. It is my understanding that there is potentially a movement to "reverse" the decision to close off Old Town streets as per the current, revised plan. I am not sure what made the City re -think their decision, but I am adamantly opposed to the reversal and fully believe with all my business instincts, that this will be great for Old Town and the business community. I am aware that there has been some "pushback" from some of the Old Town Businesses and even the OTTA, (mostly between 5th & 6th street)...... yet, you addressed their concerns by revising the plan. Which is now the right plan. There are many of us who support the effort and current plan. TEMECULA is a tourist destination. It is who we are now. By doing this will only reinforce our commitment to being one of the top draws in SoCal. Just today in New York City, restaurants are allowed to open for the first time for "outdoor seating". Guess what, they are doing the same thing that The City is offering Old Town. Expanding the footprints of restaurants to allow for social distancing and more capacity. The owners there are so excited and appreciative in NYC. Closer to home...... Carlsbad, CA has been doing it for a couple of months now.....and to great success. LA is still closed....... where do you think those folks are going to go for some relaxing and entertainment? I have already seen a great influx at my business from people from LA and other areas. LEADERS of TEMECULA ...... we will not get another opportunity to at least try this. No one knows for certain if this will be "successful" or not, but there is zero chance of ever finding out if we don't do this now. We have the 4th of July weekend around the corner, with no parade and no fireworks show....... let's give the people something special to participate in. IF YOU BUILD IT ....... they will come........ once the word is out ....... they will come from all over SoCal during the cool of the evenings to enjoy Old Town Temecula. Most every restaurant, bar and retail business will benefit immensely. You've done a great job with the additional parking. Revising the plan from 4th to 2nd WAS and IS the right move. From 4th to Main Street, you have almost unanimous business owner support for doing this. DO IT. Trust your instincts. Trust those business owners that actually have the largest stakes in Old Town. The ones that really "invest" in Old Town. Thank you. Regards, Andrew Doty ''BLUES TOYAW' WWW.OLDTOWNBLUESCLUB.COM ANDREW DOTY OLDTO WNB LU ESC LU B@GMAI L.COM 28636 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET #102 TEMECULA, CA 92590 "LIVE MUSIC LIVES HERE" Begin forwarded message: From: Richard Leigh < Subject: Fwd: Old Town Street Closure Date: June 22, 2020 at 4:27:19 PM PDT To: Andrew Doty < Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone From: Richard Leigh Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:03:22 PM To: james.stewart@temeculaca.eov <iames.stewart@temeculaca.gov>; matt.rahn@city_ council org<matt.rahn cit council.or >; zak.schwank@temeculaca.gov <zak.schwank@ temeculaca. oy>; maryann.edwards@,citycouncil.org <mar ann.edwards cit council.or g>; mnaggar@citycouncil.or<mna ar cit council.or > Cc: Luke Watson <luke.watson@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Old Town Street Closure Hello Council Members, We wanted to share our continued support of the City's plan to close part of Front Street to allow for expanded retail and restaurants on the sidewalks and parking spaces. A vast majority of the negative feedback has been north of 4th Street. The City has addressed that feedback by shortening the closure to south of 4th Street. The access to their parking lots and street parking will no longer be impacted. Claims that parking will be negatively affected is not accurate. The City has added more spaces than will be removed by the closure. Claims that the closure will decrease social distancing is also inaccurate. The closure creates more space for walking and more space for businesses, which encourages social distancing. Please note that the OTTA does not represent the whole of Old Town. In fact, they do not represent some of the largest employers in Old Town. Also, keep in mind that some of their members are also in favor of the closure. Most importantly, the decision to allow businesses to expand directly affects our ability to generate sales and in -turn keep valuable staff. The street expansion allows for a win -win situation. Restaurants and retail will have the ability to social distance and have enough space for customers to get close to pre-covid sales. In regards to 1909 specifically, the expansion gets us close to the seating we once had. It will be impossible to keep our entire staff if we are stuck at 50% capacity. Some of the feedback that we have heard is that business is "fine" since reopening. Many of these businesses have not been affected because they are not following the State's guidelines. Please give the businesses, and their employees, a chance to do the right thing AND stay in business. Please keep in mind that there is support for the program, in the form of applicants. And many shared their support during the last public hearing. I hope their voice is not lost this week. I also believe that many will join us, on the street, when the existing applicants prove that it is a worthwhile investment. It is universally understood that this is a temporary expansion. Nobody, including myself, can say that this will be perfect for Old Town or not. This is not a new idea. It has been proven in countless cities worldwide. But let's give it a chance and see if it is great. There couldn't be a more appropriate time to try out this concept. I urge the council to consider all the facts before making a decision to cancel the project. Many businesses have invested much time and money into preparing for the expansion. I have seen many of the plans, of the applicants, and can honestly say that they are well thought out and well designed. I believe it will be a great draw to Old Town. Thankyou Ricky Leigh 1909 Restaurant Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:00 PM To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery Subject: RE: Road closure Tuesday city meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johI cDtemecuIaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Thomas Kinkade -gallery < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:57 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fw: Road closure Tuesday city meeting Thomas Kinkade at Old Town 28545 Old Town Front St. Suite # 103 Temecula, CA 92590 ( ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Shawn Smoot < To: ' Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 01:11:47 PM PDT Subject: Road closure Tuesday city meeting This message is from Shawn at the cheese shop. I understand you need an email from me stating that I strongly disagree with the road closures in old town. So this is it. I think that every day is extreme and highly unnecessary. The whole idea is objectionable On so many points. In fact the businesses that were not involved in making this decision may be discriminated against. Please confirm that this is what you needed for the council meeting tomorrow thank you. Sent from my iPad Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:24 PM To: Milad Gendy Subject: RE: road closing Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randijohl@temecuiaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Milad Gendy < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:19 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: road closing Hi. I am milad Gendy from old town sweet shop and I am against close the road, it will effect my business. Thanks Milad Gendy Old Town Sweet Shop 1 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:43 PM To: 'Steven R. Lewis' Subject: RE: STREET CLOSURE Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca goy 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Steven R. Lewis < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:39 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fw: STREET CLOSURE Steven Lewis Director, Family Legal Centers ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Steven R. Lewis < To: randi. mohl temecu Ia. ca.clov <randi.johl cr,temecula.ca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 02:36:35 PM PDT Subject: Fw: STREET CLOSURE Steven Lewis Director, Family Legal Centers ----- Forwarded Message From: Steven R. Lewis < To: "randi.iohlCcDtemecualea.gov" <randi.iohlCc�temecualca.gov> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020, 03:21:43 PM PDT Subject: STREET CLOSURE DEAR COUNCIL MEMBERS, MY NAME IS STEVE LEWIS, IM THE OWNER OF FAMILY LEGAL CENTERS IN THE GAMBLING COWBOY BUILDING LOCATED AT 42072 5TH ST, TEMECULA CA. I KNOW YOU COLLECTIVELY THINK THAT THE CURRENT STREET CLOSURE COULD HELP THE OLD TOWN BUSINESS COMMUNITY, BUT I FIRMY BELIEVE ALONG WITH NUMEROUS OTHER BUSINESS OWNERS THAT YOUR DECISION DOES NOT REPRESENT THE MAJORITY OF OWNERS AND COULD PROVE TO BE THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMELS BACK .... ESPECIALLY DURING THIS COVID-19 RECOVERY PERIOD. NOW IS NOT THE THE TIME TO DISPROPORTUNATELY EXPERIMENT WITH OUR LIVELYHOODS... YOU HAVE NO RIGHT WITHOUT DOING THE PROPER RESEARCH TO INCLUDE, HAVING MORE PUBLIC HEARINGS, TO MAKE SUCH DECISIONS THAT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT SO MANY.... RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, STEVE LEWIS DIRECTOR / OWNER FAMILY LEGAL CENTERS Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:22 PM To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery Subject: RE: City Council meeting regarding street closure - from Coin Op Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl(o)temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Thomas Kinkade -gallery < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:20 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council meeting regarding street closure - from Coin Op Randi - Please see the email below from Coin Op, regarding the street closure. People keep receiving bounce back emails that their emails are not going through to you. Thanks. Jessica Thomas Kinkade at Old Town 28545 Old Town Front St. Suite # 103 Temecula, CA 92590 ( ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Peter Riccobono < To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 03:10:35 PM PDT Subject: Re: Please submit your comments and vote to City Council today, for their meeting tomorrow on the street closure Hello, My name is Peter Riccobono and I am an owner/operator of Coin -Op Game Room located on Fourth and Front Street. We as a company are against the street closure as we believe it would negatively affect our business. Please delay any closures until this can be voted on by local business owners. Thank you On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:47 PM Thomas Kinkade -gallery < wrote: Send it here, I will forward it to Randi Thomas Kinkade at Old Town 28545 Old Town Front St. Suite #103 Temecula, CA 92590 ( On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 02:42:14 PM PDT, Peter Riccobono < wrote: Yeah I tried that. I will send you my email Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Thomas Kinkade -gallery < wrote: A couple people did, they sent the email over incorrectly originally Try Randi.]ohl@tenieculaca. gov If that doesn't work, let me know and I can forward your email. Thomas Kinkade at Old Town 28545 Old Town Front St. Suite # 103 Temecula, CA 92590 ( On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 02:24:34 PM PDT, Peter Riccobono < wrote: I just sent out my email but am receiving a message that says blocked. Is anyone else having this issue. On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:35 AM Thomas Kinkade -gallery < wrote: Happy Monday! We just received notice the that City Council will be voting again on closing the street, tomorrow Tuesday the 23rd. The current plan is to start the street closure on this Wednesday the 24th and it will go on indefinitely. The City Council meeting will be online, due to covid. Despite the emails I have sent, the city would like to hear from individual owners, regarding the street closures, and have only given us 24 hours for individual owners to submit their comments via email. Please send an email today with your thoughts on the street closure to Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:19 PM To: Subject: RE: Comment for tonight's meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: John Kelliher < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:52 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comment for tonight's meeting Randi, Please enter this comment into the record at tonight's city council meeting. It relates to the agenda item regarding creating a pedestrian -only zone on Front Street in Old Town. Since Visit Temecula Valley was founded, its Board Members have discussed with enthusiasm and hope the possibility of a pedestrian zone in Old Town. Great destinations throughout the world have thriving pedestrian zones that become centers of social and economic vibrancy for visitors and locals alike. But few destinations have the ideal climate of Temecula, making an outdoor pedestrian zone an almost year-round attraction. There are many hurdles to consider, but at this unprecedented moment, there are compelling reasons to push past these hurdles to provide opportunities to business owners who have been shut down by government decree, and who now are opened but are forced to operate at capacity levels that can not sustain their business. Throughout the United States, eating and drinking establishments are literally moving out into the streets to expand their capacity and serve customers in a socially -distanced way. If nothing else, now is the time for a long-awaited experiment to determine if a pedestrian zone provides positives that outweigh the negatives. If pedestrian zones in other destinations are any indication, then it is likely that even the detractors will become fans once they witness the vibrancy that a pedestrian zone can provide. Cheers! John Kelliher Founder and Chief Wino A� Office: 951-693-5755 1 GoGrape.com Wvr1d's First Hardtop co Veoblp §hy Follow Us: Q facebookO 9vustapam Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:48 PM To: Al Rubio Subject: RE: Comment regarding Old Town Temecula outdoor dining for 6/23 Council meeting Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.'ohl temeculaca, ov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Al Rubio < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:53 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comment regarding Old Town Temecula outdoor dining for 6/23 Council meeting Dear Honorable City Council, I would like to encourage the City to persevere with your plans to help Old Town businesses, create opportunities, and embrace creative innovations, while following County guidelines regarding physical distancing and sanitizing. I would ask the City to allow for more feedback from merchants, so that they can construct a plan with consideration of all concerns. In addition, I would suggest the City to more publicly promote its intentions to market the closure of front street as a "Summer Nights" Activity to drive traffic to ALL Old Town businesses. • Lastly, I encourage the City to address how it will market and promote visitation in Old Town. Sincerely, Al Rubio I Chairman of the Board Chairman's Choice Recipient 2019 Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce 26790 Ynez Court, Ste. A Temecula, CA 92591 1 Subject:FW: Public Comment From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:19 PM To: Latina Association < Subject: RE: Public Comment Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Latina Association < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:10 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment Temecula Council Members and Mayor Pro Tem Edwards, I'd like to remind you of the responsibility we entrusted you to protect everyone regardless of your personal political alliance. I'm extremely concerned at the lack of enforcement the city has toward businesses that allow full capacity and without a mask; specifically, the bars and restaurants in Old Tow. Please, I urged you to take a strong stand on the matter. Respectfully, -- Martha Angelica Howard Latina Association of Riverside County, President Former Temecula City Council District 5 Candidate 2018 Temecula Woman of the Year NAACP-W.I.N. 2018 2 Latina Association of Riverside County "To make a difference through engaging in public policy, education, and culture affirmation." https://www.facebook.com/pages/Latina-Association-of-Riverside-County/209501775871863