Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout022703 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 Business Park Drive Teinecula, California Thursday, February 27, 2003 at 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Katan, Ramos, Wedel, Connertou, Lanier PRESENTATION: Police Chief Domenoe - Introduction of new Temecula Police Sergeant and Lieutenant Fire Station 84 Paramedic Squad - Update and demonstration of new rescue units PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. ~aere is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of January 23~ 2003 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of January 23, 2003. I COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. State Route 79 North (Winchester Road) - Construction Schedulin~ and Traffic Signal Improvements RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report. 3. Request for Multi-Way Stop Signs - Bntterfield Stage Road and Channel StreeffWelton Way RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council and the County Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Welton Way/Channel Street. 4. Promenade Chardonna¥ Hills - Multi-Way Sto~ Signs RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission continue the discussion of the Promenade Chardonnay Hills request for Multi-Way Stop Signs. 5. Temecula Citizen Corps Program RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission appoint one Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner to assist each Temecula Citizen Corps area, and appoint the Public/Traffic Safety Commission Chairman to oversee all areas. 6. Traffic Engineer's Report 7. Police Chief's Report 8. Fire Chief's Report 9. Commission Reports ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, March 27, 2003 at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Califomia. 2 ITEM NO. '1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 23, 2003 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, January 23, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Connerton. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Katan, Ramos, Wedel, Connerton, and Chairman Lanier. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Principal Engineer Butler, Principal Engineer Attar, Associate Engineer Gonzalez, Battalion Chief McBride, Police Chief Domenoe, Police Sergeant Lohman, Deputy Fire Marshal Neumann, Fire Safety Specialist Horton, Fire Safety Specialist Branaugh, Administrative Secretary Pyle, Minute Clerk Hansen, and Minute Clerk Ross. *(It is noted that Commissioner Katan arrived at 6:03 p.m.) PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Introduction of new Fire Department Staff- Battalion Chief McBride Battalion Chief McBride introduced the following new employees to the Commission: Fire Safety Specialist Mike Horton, Fire Safety Specialist Shawn Branaugh, and Deputy Fire Marshal Jason Neumann. Chairman Lanier congratulated Battalion Chief McBride on his promotion and welcomed all the new Fire Department employees to the City of Temecula. Police Department Update - Police Chief Domenoe Police Chief Domenoe provided the Commission with an update on the progress of the Citizen Corps Program, as follows: · That the Citizen Corps Program will consist of members of government, the school district, the community, the Fire and Police Departments, the City, the business community and community-at-large; · That weekly meetings are being held with the Council in order to formalize a training program; · That on January 16, 2003, the first community informational meeting was held to solicit citizens who wish to participate in this program; and that it was met with a very positive response; · That at the January 16 meeting, interest cards were distributed to attendees who were also advised that program information was available as well as being made available on the City's website. Approximately 25 interest cards have been received to date and each individual is being contacted personally; · That on January 30, 2003, a second public introduction meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers at 7 p.m; · That presently staff is developing a marketing plan and budget for the program. Police Chief Domenoe conveyed to the Commission that he was very excited about the program and assured to keep them the Commission updated on the Citizen Corps' progress. In response to Commissioner Wedel's request for an organizational chart of the Citizen Corps Program, Chief Domenoe stated that he would make the chart available to the Commission. Commissioner Connerton congratulated Police Chief Domenoe and all the members of the Police and Fire Departments for organizing such a great program. Chief Domenoe advised that it was a team effort; and that he is very optimistic that this program will be a model for this area and, perhaps, even the nation. For Commissioner Katan, Chief Domenoe advised that an initial budget of $5,000 was appropriated from the Police Department. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of October 24 and December 127 2002 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of October 24, 2002. 1.2 Approve the Minutes of December 12, 2002. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Wedel and voice vote reflected approval, with the exception of Commissioner Ramos who abstained from Consent Calendar Item No. 1. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Request for Multi-Way Stop Si.qns - Promenade Chardonnay Hills RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request for Multi-Way Stop Signs along Promenade Chardonnay Hills. Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report of record, reviewed the background of the request, and recommended that the Commission approve staff's request to deny the request for multi-way stop signs along Promenade Chardonnay Hills. In response to Chairman Lanier's query and in reference to the chart on page 2 of the staff report, Senior Engineer Moghadam clarified that the data in the chart was compiled prior to the purchase of the light emitting diode (LED) signs. Replying to Commissioner Connerton's inquiries, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised, as follows: · That at present, there were currently no temporary stop signs in Chardonnay Hills; · That one sign was present in the west northerly direction for approximately months; · That one stop sign was present for a few weeks but removed due to a resident's complaint; and the fact that a policy was not in place at the time, therefore, the sign was unenforceable. For Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised that there were no realized benefits from the signs because they weren't up long enough to do a complete before and after speed data study; however, in conversations with residents and in the R:\trafficminutes\012303 3 perception of drivers, he advised that people were slowing down as a result of the LED sign and that the signs elicited a positive response. For clarification purposes, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised that the location of the sign for the westerly or northerly direction was just east of Chemin Margaux and the sign in the easterly direction was north of Parducci Lane; and that it was the sign north of Parducci Lane that was removed. In response to Commissioner Wedel's inquiry, Senior Engineer Moghadam stated that, although the data was seven to eight months old, staff had recently completed daily observational counts; and there were no significant changes in traffic because most of the homes were still under construction and not currently occupied. At this time, Chairman Lanier opened the public hearing. The following citizens stated their support for the installation of stop signs in the Chardonnay Hills area: · Joseph LaMarca, 41138 Promenade Chardonnay · Don Smith, 41209 Promenade Chardonnay · Tracy Enalen, 41200 Promenade Chardonnay · James Wrather, 41194 Promenade Chardonnay · Vincent Cocca, 41132 Promenade Chardonnay The above citizens were in favor of the installation of stop signs in the Chardonnay Hill area for the following reasons: · That cut-through traffic has increased and traffic conditions have become worse with the increased growth; · That the safety of the neighborhood children is of concern; · That drivers speeding issues is 24 hours a day; · That the LED signs were not working or not working long enough; · That the traffic creates excessive noise impacts. At this time, Chairman Lanier closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wedel thanked the citizens for their comments and summarized the issues as follows: · That the neighborhood perception is one of excessive speeding which has been validated by the recommendation of the Public/Safety Traffic Commission for Stage #1 traffic calming; however, in this case, traffic calming efforts were not successful; · That a problem does exist - excessive speed; and that the issue is how to address it appropriately; · That, in addition, the issue of liability should be addressed if unwarranted stop signs were installed; · That the idea that stop signs are not effective in slowing traffic should be challenged. Via overhead projection, Commissioner Wedel referred to a chart distributed by the Public Works Commission from an issue of the Urban Transportation Monitor called "The Effectiveness of Traffic Calming Measures to Reduce Speeds." The effectiveness of stop signs fell in the middle of the chart; · That warrants are guidelines--not laws; · That the preface should be customer friendliness and creating a peaceful quiet safe environment; · That a staff report, which recommends no stop signs, cannot be supported without providing an alternate solution. Commissioner Connerton made the following points: · That it has not been proven that stop signs slow traffic but that they function as part of an overall program to control traffic; · That because these are public streets, cut-through traffic is very difficult to control; · That traffic speeds could be studied by placing the radar trailer in the neighborhood which measures and records speeds. Because there is an obvious problem with traffic/speed in the neighborhood and the Commission is charged with finding the most appropriate solution, Commissioner Connerton recommended that the radar trailer be placed on the neighborhood streets for a period of three to four days; that the trailer then be removed and that traffic speeds be enforced by motor officers for several days; that the radar trailer be put back in the neighborhood and repeat the cycle in order to make a good determination of the traffic/speed issue. Commissioner Ramos commended the residents and homeowners of Chardonnay Hills for investing their time and efforts and agreed with Commissioner Wedel that a solution needs to be found to alleviate the neighborhood traffic issues. Commissioner Ramos stated that to continue to study the issues would just belabor the problem and recommended action by installing two stop signs, especially one where the school bus stops. Commissioner Katan thanked the residents for their comments; advised that, obviously, the data did not support what the residents were experiencing in their neighborhood; and agreed with Commissioner Ramos regarding the placement of a stop sign perhaps at the highest point of speed as a good test to determine if a stop sign would slow down the traffic. Commissioner Katan opined that if a stop sign placed at the greatest point of speed were successful in slowing the traffic down, additional signs could then be considered not by warrant standards but by actual standards. Commissioner Katan suggested increased enforcement, speed bumps (referring to a television program about speed bumps in the City of Seattle that were designed to be open for the wheel base of emergency vehicles), or any alternative that would improve the situation without relying solely on stop signs. In response to Commissioner Katan's inquiry, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised that there was one location where visibility was an issue; however, it only becomes an issue if someone were using excessive speed - referring to the location as Chemin Cline (the top of the hill). Referring to the location of the tot lot/pool as justification for a stop sign, Senior Engineer Moghadam clarified for Commissioner Wedel, that all conditions are considered not just those that directly impact the warrant FAILED MOTION: Commissioner Wedel made a motion to install two stop signs of the four requested, one at the Chemin Cline intersection (where the bus stops) as an initial deterrent to cut-through traffic and teave the other stop sign open for discussion. The motion was seconded for discussion by Commissioner Ramos. Ultimately, this motion failed for lack of a vote. Chairman Lanier suggested that as part of the follow-up study, an up-to-date survey be compiled to include the numbers and the 85th percentile. Commissioner Connerton requested the completion of an additional up-to-date analysis; advised that it was his experience that stop signs do not slow traffic but do cause a false sense of safety; and relayed that, at this time, he would not be in favor of any stop signs at this time; Discussion ensued among the Commissioners with various solutions being suggested. The consensus was to have staff prepare a solution(s) and bring the item back to the Commission at the next meeting. Director of Public Works Hughes made the following points: · That it would be his preference not to install stop signs only to possibly have them removed because of ineffectiveness; · That if stop signs were to be installed for the purpose of slowing traffic, the Commission should make that recommendation to the City Council; · That regardless of the number of completed surveys that are done, the existing speeds will not satisfy everyone; · That a drastic change in speed will not occur by installing multiple stop signs; The average drop in speed is 3 m.p.h; · That if the Commission has a recommendation, it should go forward with it and not experiment. In response to Commissioner Connerton's inquiry, Director of Public Works Hughes clarified that the use of the LED radar trailer and increased enforcement could be implemented without City Council approval; however, in order for a stop sign to be enforceable, it would require City Council approval. SECOND MOTION: Commissioner Connerton made a motion to: (1) install the LED speed limit signs in both directions at a location to be determined by the Public Works Department for a period of 10 days, (2) enforce speed limits, and monitor and record speeds at regular intervals to be determined by the Police Department to be the most effective for a period of 10 days, and (3) return the LED radar trailer to measure the effectiveness of enforcement. The motion was seconded for discussion by Chairman Lanier. This motion ultimately failed (see page 8). If the Commission's intention were to immediately affect driving habits, Sergeant Loman advised that placing motor officers in the area writing tickets would be the most effective. Commissioner Connerton added that it would be his desire to record the speeds measured by the radar trailer in order to have additional data to compare with the speed surveys. Commissioner Wedel opined that these solutions had been tried over a year ago, and that increased enforcement by the Police Department doesn't provide a permanent solution; therefore, he cannot support such a motion. Commissioner Connerton reiterated that it was also a proven fact that stop signs are not an effective measure for slowing traffic. Referring to the traffic engineers' survey, Commissioner Wedel advised that stop signs were ranked as an effective tool for slowing traffic. Director of Public Works Hughes encouraged the Commission to set an objective and to request staff to evaluate solutions in an effort to meet that goal. In agreement with Director of Public Works Hughes, Commissioner Wedel articulated the facts, as follows: · That according to California Law, there is a 25 m.p.h, speed limit in a residential neighborhood; · That the Police Department advises that a ticketable speed is approximately 30 m.p.h, in a residential neighborhood; · That as an intermediate step, options be discussed between staff and the neighborhood homeowners association; that agreeable actions be forwarded to the Commission in four weeks for approval. Director of Public Works Hughes advised that if the goal were 30 m.p.h., that staff would discuss recommendations with the Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association to ensure their acceptance and forward a recommendation to the next meeting of the Public/Safety Traffic Commission to be held on February 27, 2003. For Director of Public Works Hughes, Commissioner Wedel clarified that the goal would be an 85th percentile of 30 m.p.h. By way of a voice vote, the previously made motion failed, as follows: Commissioners Katan, Ramos, Wedel were opposed and Commissioner Connerton and Chairman Lanier were in support. Commissioner Ramos opined that as a motorist he would cut-through Chardonnay Hills knowing that the neighborhood has no stop signs; however, if he knew he would have to make several stops, he would avoid the neighborhood. FINAL MOTION: Commissioner Katan made a motion to direct staff to provide the Public Safety/Traffic Commission with alternatives and options which would address the goal of reducing the speeds in the Chardonnay Hills neighborhood to 30 m.p.h. (i.e., the 85th percentile of speed traveled at 30 m.p.h.), and that staff obtain input from the Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association regarding these alternatives and options prior to the next Public/Safety Traffic Commission Meeting on February 27, 2003; and, additionally, moved to increase enforcement in the Chardonnay Hills area. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Wedel and voice vote reflected approval, with the exception of Commissioner Ramos, who opposed. 3. Jefferson Avenue Median Desiqn - Winchester Road to Sanborn Avenue Recommendation: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report and provide recommendations as necessary. Chairman Lanier advised that he would be abstaining from this item, and left the dais at this time. Director of Public Works Hughes presented a brief update on the status of the median design and introduced Senior Engineer Butler and Senior Engineer Attar who presented additional information via enlarged Exhibits, highlighting the following: · That the project only entails improvements to the intersection of Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue; · That the improvements primarily address the increased turning movements anticipated with additional development in the City; · That the improvements also address the widening of Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue; · That the point of discussion tonight, however, is the proposed access control and conflicting left-turn movements along Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and Sanborn Avenue; · That Exhibit 1 represents all current peak hour traffic counts for the left-turn movements in the vicinity of the area under study; · That Exhibit 2 depicts the proposed median (from Winchester Road to Sanborn Avenue) that would allow traffic to make a left or U-turn at Sanborn Avenue in a left-turn pocket; · That the proposed improvements include a widening on the southbound direction of Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and Sanborn Avenue; · That the high volume of accidents in this area is attributed to conflicting left turns cutting across through traffic; · That in staff's opinion, to cut the median shorter would only shift the accident point. For clarification purposes, Senior Engineer Butler stated that the funded and approved portion of the project was for the Winchester Road Intersection Improvements, i.e., the dual left-hand turn lanes. Commissioner Ramos expressed his concern for the business owners on both sides of the street that would be tremendously impacted by the proposed median. Director of Public Works Hughes commented, as follows: · That Jefferson Avenue was not the only street location that medians were being considered; · That the City's Capital Improvement Program has identified median installation for the entire length of Jefferson Avenue from the City limits to the north all the way to Rancho California to the south; · That because of the multiple conflicting traffic movements, there exists a traffic accident problem; · That the General Plan identifies Jefferson Avenue as an arterial roadway with a median; · That a roadway with a median has a greater roadway vehicle capacity; · That the issue is providing effective access to the adjacent properties vs. reducing accidents and improving the capacity of the roadway; · That as the City grows and roadway capacity and volume increases, in some cases, traffic traveling in one direction can support those businesses that were previously dependent on two-way traffic; R:~trafficminutes\012303 9 · That it would be suggested that the Commission hear the concerns of the business owners in the area and their recommendations. · That at this time, this is only a study instrument and that no final determination has been made; · That from a transportation and safety standpoint, the median would be the preferred alternative; however, staff does recognize the issue of access to businesses. In response to Commissioner Connerton's queries, Public Works Director Hughes clarified, as follows: · That the traffic volumes as stated in the staff report reflect current peak hour volumes (a.m. and p.m.) and that they are not projecting future volumes; · That upon completion, the new interchange improvements are going to change traffic patterns throughout the area and may alleviate some concerns of the area businesses; · That the intersection improvements at Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road will be needed with or without the proposed interchange; · That the median would serve as a means of correcting an existing accident issue; · That there is no design manual warrant for medians; · That there are different hierarchies of roadways that have theoretical capacities and access restrictions and that as designated, Jefferson Avenue was intended to serve a higher level of volume and capacity - one that would require a median. For Commissioner Katan, Director of Public Works Hughes stated that solely the accident rate would warrant the need for new alternatives and that staff would likely recommend a median regardless of the street classification. Regarding the accident history at Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road, Senior Engineer Moghadam commented that because of the Commission's awareness of the high number of accidents, it was requested that the issue be agendized; and in response to Commissioner Katan's inquiry, it was indicated that there was no specific number of accidents. At this time, Chairman Connerton opened the hearing to the public. The following individuals and business owners spoke in opposition to the proposed median: * Carliene Anderson, 27311 Jefferson Avenue, Winchester Plaza Project * Billy Lim, 27300 Jefferson Avenue #A, Operator of Billy B's * Fred Grimes, 27311 Jefferson Avenue #103 * David Thompson, 27315 Jefferson Avenue ¢~LI, Mailmart * Jack Williams, 27311 Jefferson Road, Owner of Richie's Diner * Darcey Rooney, 27311 Jefferson Avenue * Mark Esbensen, 27311 Jefferson Avenue The above-mentioned individuals and business owners were opposed to the proposed median and provided the following comments: · That limiting access to businesses on either side of Jefferson Avenue would be devastating and could cause the loss of 40% to 60% of their business; · That access and circulation is a critical element to a successful business; · That the same sensitivity that was shown to businesses on the east side of the City be afforded to those on Jefferson Avenue, i.e., circulation plans, stop lights, and left turn pockets; · That a stop light and protected left-hand turn be installed at Sanborn to allow a break in traffic rather than a median limiting access to businesses. · That a balance be found between traffic needs, safety, and the needs of the surrounding businesses. · That the Commission schedule a workshop with staff and the affected business owners in order to consider all the issues. · That the speed limit on Jefferson Avenue be lowered. · That in the spirit of cooperation, the owners of Jefferson Creek Center offered to redo the existing driveway approach so that it would create an easier ingress/egress, noting that there currently is a steep incline in the driveway apron causing traffic to almost stop before entering. At this time, Commissioner Connerton closed the public hearing. Commissioner Katan opined that an effective Commission is one that addresses issues that are problems for its citizens, i.e., the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road; and that the decision should be based on fact not emotion. Commissioner Ramos agreed that there was a high incident of accidents because of the speed of traffic coming in from the City of Murrieta; that the driveway was an issue and should be redesigned to create an easier ingress and egress; and that it was his recommendation to hold a workshop with staff, emergency services, and business owners to develop alternative solutions and bring them to the Commission for further review. In response to Commissioner Connerton's inquiries, Director of Public Works Hughes advised, as follows: R:\trafficrmnutes\012303 1 1 · That no final determinations have been made other than the improvements to the intersection. · That the dispersal of information and workshops were planned as part of the median projects throughout the City. · That the observation of the high accident rate at Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road caused the Commission to request that this item be placed on the agenda for the purpose of discussing the issue and proposing possible solutions. · That the input received from both the Commission and business and property owners is valuable in the continuation of staff's work. Responding to some of the comments presented, Director of Public Works relayed the following: · With regard to speed limits, the City has a limited ability to control speed limits or lower them below the 85th percentile speed. · With regard to the signal at Sanborn Avenue, any gaps in traffic that would be created by a signal would be short lived due to the expected increase in traffic volumes. In addition, the City has a priority list of approximately 40 signal locations, with funding available for one or two per year. · With the interchange project to the north and if the ramp serves access to Jefferson Avenue, there will be a signal light to the north of this location. In response to the Commission's inquiries, Director of Public Works Hughes advised as follows: · That the intersection improvements providing multiple left and right turn movements are funded in the current budget. · That the intersection project will be taken north to at least driveway #19 (Exhibit 3), with more flexibility from that point north. · That the dual stacking lane will be 300 feet in length. · That construction on the median project would be approximately 12 months away with the construction of the intersection improvements occurring earlier. MOTION: Commissioner Ramos made a motion that staff schedule a workshop to discuss alternatives and options to the proposed median project and invite emergency services, business owners, and members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. Commissioner Wedel seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Chairman Lanier, who abstained. Commissioner Katan opined the importance of giving property and business owners adequate notification and requested that staff plan accordingly. it is noted that the Public/Safety Traffic Commission received and filed this report with comments. 4. Appointment of Chairman and Vice Chairman RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission entertain nominations from the Commissioners to appoint a Chairman and a Vice Chairman to preside until the end of the 2003 calendar year. MOTION: Commissioner Katan made a motion to elect Commissioner Connerton as Chairman of the Public Safety/Traffic Commission until the end of the 2003 calendar year. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ramos and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton made a motion to elect Commissioner Katan as Vice Chairman of the Public Safety/Traffic Commission until the end of the 2003 calendar year. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ramos and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT There were no further comments made. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT There were no further comments made. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT There were no further comments made. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Connerton advised that he had received notice of a meeting to discuss the recommendations for amendments to the General Plan which were in the final stages and would be presented to the City Council in the near future. Commissioner Connerton encouraged everyone to attend the meeting for the Citizen Corps Program to be held next Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 7 p.m. Chairman Lanier suggested that recognition in the form of an award be given to officers for their dedication and hard work during the implementation of "DUI Checkpoints," and that the involvement of the Trauma Intervention Program (TIP) would be of benefit to the Citizen Corps Program. R:~trafficm~nutes\012303 1 3 ADJOURNMENT At 9:28 P.M. Chairman Lanier formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairman Scott Lanier Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle ITEM NO. 2 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: ~ Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic DATE: February 27, 2003 SUBJECT: Item 2 State Route 79 North (Winchester Road) - Construction Scheduling and Traffic Signal Improvements RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report. BACKGROUND: This item has been placed on the agenda at the request of Chairman Connerton. Ms. Elaine Johnson, representative from Supervisor Venable's office will make a brief presentation regarding State Route 79 North (Winchester Road) construction scheduling and traffic signal improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: None. 1 ITEM NO. 3 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: ~ Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic DATE: February 27, 2003 SUBJECT: Item 3 Request for Multi-Way Stop Signs - Butterfield Stage Road and Channel Street/Welton Way RECOMMENDATION: That thc Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council and thc County of Riverside Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop signs at thc intersection of But~erfield Stage Road and Wclton Way/Channel Street. BACKGROUND: Over the past few months both City of Temecula and County of Riverside staff have received several requests to consider installation of stop signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Channel Street/Welton Way to reduce vehicular speeds and provide a controlled crossing during school hours. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration o£this issue through the agenda notification process and by mail. In April 2002, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered a request from Kids In Danger (KID) to install traffic control devices at several locations near schools throughout the City. This intersection was one o£the locahons considered. The specific request received from KID was for the installation o£multi-way stop signs to address heavy congestion during school "pick-up" and "drop-off' times. At that time, it was stalT s opinion that multi-way stop signs would not alleviate traffic congestion and that a full time multi-way stop control was not an appropriate device to mitigate conditions at the intersection. It was also staff's opinion that a traffic signal was a more appropriate traffic control device for the intersection. The Commission approved the staff recoramendation to maintain the present level o£control at the intersection and to add the intersection to the list of potential traffic signal locations £or consideration during the budget review process. Butterfield Stage Road between State Route 79 and Nighthawk Pass is classified as a 76 foot wide £our (4) lane Major Highway on the City's General Plan Circulation Element with two travel lanes in each direction, a raised median and a bike lane in each direction. The east half of Butterfield Stage Road lies within the County of Riverside's jurisdiction. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Butterfield Stage Road is approximately 6,200 south of State Route 79 and approximately 3,200 south o£ Channel Street/Welton Way. The speed limit is posted at 50 MPH on Burterfield Stage Road. However, during school hours the speed limit is posted at 25 MPH in accordance with the provisions o£ the California Vehicle Code. Welton Way is a short entry way street that functions as a residential collector street providing access from Butterfield Stage Road to numerous single-family residential units and Vail Ranch Middle School. The ADT on Welton Way is approximately 2,800. The speed limit is posted at 25 MPH on Welton Way. Welton Way functions as a Suggested Route to School providing direct access to Vail Ranch Middle School. Channel Street, located in the County of Riverside, is a residential street that functions as a residential collector street providing access from Butterfield Stage Road and Nighthawk Pass to numerous single-family residential units. The ADT on Channel Street is approximately 2,600. The speed limit is not posted on Channel Street. Channel Street functions as a Suggested Route to School provk~mg direct access to Vail Ranch Middle School. In order to evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs, entering vehicular volume data was collected and accident history was reviewed for the intersection. This data along with an evaluation of other roadway conditions was used to perform a Multi-Way Stop Warrant analysis. A review of the accident history for the twelve (12) month period from January 1, 2002 to December 31,2002, indicates that there were no reported collisions at this intersection. This indicates that the majority of drivers are exercising due care when traveling through the intersection. The Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that the multi-way stop signs may be useful at locations where the volume of traffic on intersecting roads is approximately equal and/or where a combination of high speed, restricted sight distance and an accident history indicates that assignment of right-of-way is necessary. Multi- way stop signs should not be used for controlling vehicular speed. There are three (3) criteria that Caltrans has established for the evaluation of Multi-Way Stop signs. These criteria are as follows: 1. Where signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installations. 2. An accident problem, as indicated by five (5) or more reported accidents within a twelve (12) month period ora type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and letS-tam collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Minimum Traffic Volumes a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day, and b. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight (8) hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but c. When the 85~h percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. The Multi-Way Stop Warrant analysis performed for the intersection indicates that the minimum traffic volume warrant is satisfied and Multi-Way Stop signs are warranted at the intersection. The reasons that the minimum warrants are now satisfied, unlike April 2002, is that homes east of Butterfield Stage Road are now fully occupied and Channel Street has been opened between Butterfield Stage Road and Nighthawk Pass. Therefore, in order to improve the safety of students and adults when crossing Butterfield Stage Road, staff is recommending the installation of Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Welton Way/Channel Street. 2 Although, Multi-Way Stop signs are being recommended at this time, as an interim measure, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission can still make a recommendation that the City Council and the County Board of Supervisors include this location on the list of potential future traffic signal locations. Since Butterfield Stage Road is a major north/south arterial, which serves a developing area of the City and County, a traffic signal is still the most efficient means of providing traffic control at this intersection. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Account for signing and striping. Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Minutes and Agenda Report, April 25, 2002 3. Exhibit "C" - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis 3 EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP Channel St Welton Way EXHIBIT "B" PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES AND AGENDA REPORT APRIL 25, 2002 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION APRIL 25, 2002 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Thursday, April 25, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Wedel. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Coe, Connerton, Katan, Wedel, and Chairman Lanier. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Associate Engineer Gonzalez, Fire Captain McBride, Police Lieutenant Pingel, Police Sergeant Lohman, Administrative Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation re,qardin,q the Community Action Patrol (CAP) Team Pre.qram - Officer Bob Ridley Officer Ridley provided an overview of the Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program, a volunteer program that he oversees, noting the following: · That the CAP vehicles had been donated, one of which was a Ford Explorer donated by City Manager Nelson, and the other a Chevrolet pick-up truck donated by the Public Works Depadment; · That currently there were nine members, introducing the four members that were present, relaying that there were an additional four volunteers in the Citizen Academy; · That there were hopes of receiving additional vehicles in the future; · That the CAP responsibilities included the following: patrolling the City, and contacting the dispatch center if witnessing any unusual activity, aid in directing traffic, aid in missing children incidents · vacation house checks, and · school site patrolling; and · That the volunteers typically work in pairs in a CAP vehicle with a third volunteer acting as a dispatCher, and if no member was present at the dispatch center, the volunteers utilized their own cell phones and dispatched from the vehicles. Mr. Larry O'Keefe, CAP member, provided additional information regarding the CAP Program, relaying the following: · That the program had a weekly schedule, which he distributed to the Commission, as well as a list of patrol stop requests; · That there was a need for cell phones for utilization in the program; · That there was a goal was to make the public more aware of the program in order for the volunteers to be utilized more efficiently; · That the ability to have direct communication with the Police Depadment would be a benefit; and · Queried whether the CAP volunteers could do anything to aid the Public/Traffic Safety Commission (i.e., patrol specified troubled areas, direct traffic, etc.) For Commissioner Connerton, Mr. O'Keefe confirmed that the CAP Program was under the jurisdiction of the Police Department; and in response to Chairman Lanier, noted the desire to let residents know that one did not have to be a senior citizen to become a member. Commissioner Connerton advised that in the future, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission may request the CAP volunteers to work in the school areas where there was excessive traffic. In response to Chairman Lanier, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the Public Works Department had no available cell phones or radios. Noting that recently safety tips have been added to the Public Works Department's news release, Chairman Lanier advised that via e-mail (to either Chairman Lanier or Police Sergeant Lohman) CAP information could be forwarded for consideration for inclusion in the news release; and additionally suggested that flyers be posted, which would make the public aware of the need for additional volunteers. · Ms. Laurie J. Casper, representing ForTel Traffic, Inc., demonstrated for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission the vehicle calming traffic sign, which the City recently ordered, noting the following: · That the device was utilized primarily in school areas and heavy traffic areas; · That per recent studies, the device slowed seventeen percent (17%) of all vehicles. approaching the sign; · That even in sunlight motorists can see the bright lit signage from 1,000 feet; and · . Demonstrated how the radar unit registers the oncoming vehicle's speed and then displays (flashes) that speed. For Commissioner Connerton, Ms. Casper noted that the speed was displayed once, Subsequently displaying the following vehicle's speed; and relayed that the device could be mounted numerous places. In to Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the response City ordered four of the devices, confirming that the devices' locations would be rotated; for Commissioner Katan, noted that the devices the City ordered were proximate in size to the one being demonstrated; and for Commissioner Wedel, relayed that the device would also record the speeds collected which could be downloaded for study purposes. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Robert Purmont, 45099 Corte Valle, noted that he came to address the topic of deception on the part of police officers and their supervisors; opined that in alternate cities, as the population rises, the Police Department operates in a self-serving manner, which victimizes the citizens; citied examples of corruption in other entities, such as the courts, religious institutions, and etc.; opined that the Temecula Police Department was not serving the public when patrolling (for the purpose of issuing citations) on Jefferson Avenue between Via Montezuma and Del Rio Road, which was not an area with numerous accidents. Thanking Mr. Purmont for addressing his comments, Police Sergeant Lohman advised that Mr. Purmont could make a copy of the notes he had brought and that he and Police Sergeant Lohman could address his concerns without the same time constraints imposed during the public comment period of a hearing, relaying that Mr. Purmont could either call, or come down to the station. For informational purposes, Commissioner Coe noted that based on his travels through numerous cities, it was his opinion that Temecula Police Department was the finest police department he has ever seen. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of March 28, 2002. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. School Area Traffic Circulation - Kids in Danger (KID) Committee RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission take the following action: 1. Direct staff to continue imposing restricted hours/days of operation for construction activities around school sites; 2. Recommend that the existing stdping on Plo Pico Road in front of Sparkman Elementary School not be changed; 3. Recommend that the present level of traffic control on Rancho Vista Road at Temecula Valley High School be maintained; 4. Recommend that the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Avenida La Reina be included on the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration of partial funding during the budget review process; 5. Direct staffto develop a special traffic signal timing plan to accommodate school peak hour traffic at the intersection of Margarita Road at Ranch Vista Road; 6. Recommend that the present ievel of traffic control at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate Street be maintained; and 7. Recommend that the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate Street be included on the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration during the budget review process. Providing a detailed overview of the staff report (of record), Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed the following information regarding the several suggestions the Kids in Danger (KID) Committee (a group of concerned parents) brought to the City's attention with respect to safety issues related to the City's school sites: · With respect to the concern regarding the construction activities proximate to school sites, in particular during the hours of the schools operation, noted that while to the extent feasible construction hours were limited to certain periods of time when traffic would be less impacted, that the contractors needed a certain window of time to complete their work. · With respect to the desire to remove the bike lane on Plo Pico Road proximate to the school site in order to allow parking in this area, relayed that due to the width of the road, there would not be adequate space to provide for parking in this area. · With respect to the recommendation to install a three-way stop on Ranch Vista Road at the high school exit driveway, noted that with the exception of the time when there is school traffic generated, the installation would be requiring drivers to stop for no good reason which ultimately renders the installation ineffective, advising that a better solution would be the installation of a traffic signal, noting that a recommendation was provided to the School District that if there was consideration to participate in the costs of the construction of the signal, as well as implementing on-site modifications in the parking lot, the City was willing to consider placing a signal at this location; and noted that this particular signal was on the pdodty list. · Regarding the concerns with respect to Winchester Road proximate to Chaparral High School, relayed that with respect to extending the left-turn, lane at westbound/southbound Margarita Road, noted that staff could recommend to Caltrans that this particular left-turn pocket be extended; advised that numerous issues relayed would need to be addressed by the School District and/or Caltrans, including adding exit driveways to Winchester Road, and installing two-right turn lanes out of the main driveway at Chaparral High School at Nicolas Road; and · With respect to the recommendation to install a temporary traffic signal or a stop sign at Buttedield Stage Road/Weiton Way, advised that while a stop sign would only be effective during the school start and release times, that it has been relayed that if the School District placed a crossing guard at this location, the City would install striping for a crosswalk as well as installing appropriate signage, additionally noting that half of this intersection was in the County and whatever installations were proposed in this area would need to be approved by the County. Ms. Adrienne Potter, 30816 Medinah Way, representing KID, noted appreciation for Senior Engineer Moghadam due to his thorough and expedient response to the school issues which were presented to him by this particular committee; provided an overview of various school site issues she has dealt with in the past in alternate cities; noted that on Margarita Road, the 25 MPH speed limit signs were placed on the wrong side of the intersection; advised that most of the cities in California utilize retirees for crosswalk supervision; and concurred with the concepts presented by staff regarding various joint funding efforts between the City and the School District in order to install much-needed traffic implementations (i.e., signals). For Ms. Potter, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that the most important factor at the Avenida La Reina location would be to connect the parking lots in order to allow access from one lot to another. For information purposes, Chairman Lanier relayed the time restrictions associated with public comments. In response to Commissioner Coe, Ms. Potter relayed that this organization, KID, was recently formed, confirming that she had formed similar committees in other cities, citing projects which had been implemented due to committee efforts; for Commissioner Connerton, relayed that for fifteen years she has been a safety activist; noted that the School District was provided a copy of the letter which was provided to the City; for Commissioner Coe, noted that there were approximately 25 interested members on the KID Committee; and for Commissioner Katan, confirmed that it was Mr. McKinney from the School District that the committee had scheduled a meeting with. Commissioner Connerton noted that in the City'of Temecula the School District and the City had a good working relationship with ongoing open dialogue; and applauded Ms. Potter for her efforts. Commissioner Katan advised that once the committee had met with Mr. McKinney from the School District significant progress would begin. Ms. Sherry Stanfill, 29970 Rancho California Road, # 80, echoed Ms. Potter's comments regarding appreciation to staff for all their efforts regarding this agenda item; via overheads, specified her concerns regarding the Joan F. Sparkman Elementary School site, noting the ongoing illegal parking occurring while parents wait to pick up their children, specifying all available parking areas including a dirt lot which is currently being utilized; recommended that there be a loading zone created, prohibiting parking, and allowing a larger area for parents to pick up their children; noted that she was a proponent for the bike lane being removed, allowing parking on the south and north side of the street; with respect to Vail Ranch Middle School, recommended restricting the f parking on the west side of Buttedield Stage Road in order to improve the flow of the children pick up process; and for Commissioner Katan, specified the areas where school staff was currently parking off-site due to the lack of parking provisions. For informational purposes, Fire Captain McBride advised that removal of the bike lanes in order to allow parking would not be feasible due to Fire Department width and distance requirements; and noted that enforcement would need to be increased in light of the plethora of illegal parking in this area in order to ensure that there was Fire Department access was available at all times. Mr. Jeff Okun, representing the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD), expressed appreciation to the Public Works Department staff, advising that if there was an issue needing to be addressed he would typically set up a meeting with Senior Engineer Moghadam in order to analyze the matter; recommended that with regard to this issue, that City staff and the TVUSD staff work together to address the matter; advised that at the Joan F. Sparkman Elementary School site, the charter school was being removed from this site which would open up the lower parking lot for additional parking; and commenting on the adequate parking provisions at the Vail Ranch Middle School site, advised that the greatest significant negative impact in his view was the plethora of U-turns movements made at this location. For informational purposes and for future plans for school sites, Commissioner Connerton recommended that the School District have the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review the development plans and circulation issues for proposed school sites, as was conducted with the Ysabel Barnett Elementary School site. In response, Mr. Okun relayed that the School District coordinates with the City's Engineering Department on all future school sites, advising that he would take this recommendation under consideration. Commissioner Katan noted his support of staff's recommendation, relaying hopes that the KID Committee's upcoming meeting with Mr. McKinney from the School Distdct would be productive. Concurring with Commissioner Katan's comments, Commissioner Coe, echoed by Commissioner Connerton, commended staff for the thorough manner in which this issue was addressed. Commissioner Wedel noted that he was pleased with the cooperative efforts between the City and the School District. Relaying his concurrence with previous Commission comments, Chairman Lanier advised that in the past two to three years the cooperative efforLs between the City and the School Board have greatly improved; advised that there was a Joint City Council/TVUSD Advisory Committee (with Councilman Naggar and Mayor Roberts serving on this panel), noting that, if deemed necessary, the issues addressed at tonight's meeting could be further addressed by this particular committee. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Coe and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 3. Traffic Conditions - Milky Way and Rancho California Road RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission take the following action: 1. Recommend that the current pdma facie speed limit of 25 MPH is maintained on Milky Way; 2. Recommend the installation of 25 MPH speed limit signs on Milky Way with additional enforcement; and 3. Recommend that the current posted speed limit of 50 MPH on Rancho California Road between Moraga Road and Margarita Road be maintained. Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report (per agenda material), noting that a few years ago the City conducted a study evaluating all the streets within the Starlight Ridge Community including Milky Way; advised that as a result of that particular analysis, several stop signs had been installed and enforcement was increased which rendered good results; relayed that after conducting another speed survey on Ranch California Road and Milky Way, the analysis determined that there were no unusual conditions occurring in this area, ergo staff was not recommending any changes in speed limits, but was recommending the installation of 25 MPH limits signs (which was the prima facie speed) on Milky Way, that.Milky Way be placed on a list to receive installation of the radar speed display signs (as demonstrated earlier in the meeting), and that enforcement be increased in this area. Per review of the speed data associated with this item, Commissioner Wedel noted, for the Police Department's information, that there appeared to be a single driver traveling between 56-70 MPH in this 25 MPH zone. While noting that at times vehicles traveling in the downhill area of Asteroid Way (across from the shopping center) had difficulty exiting, Commissioner Connerton concurred with staff's recommendation. Providing a history of the Starlight Ridge traffic issues, and the activism of the residents in this area, Commissioner Coe supported staff's recommendation. Commissioner Katan recommended additionally that the Stage I of Traffic Calming Program be implemented. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Wedel and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 4. Status Report- Winchester Road Pedestrian Bridqe at Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file this status report. Providing an update regarding the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road, Director of Public Works Hughes presented the staff report (of record); noted that in spite of expressed concern, it was determined that Chaparral High School would be located at the existing site which was outside of the City's control; noted that in 1999, a task force was formed which included the Police Depadment, School officials, and City staff which evaluated the intersection as to whether there were any feasible improvements which could be installed at this location; relayed that it was determined that there should be an exit driveway added on Winchester Road due to the vehicular/pedestrian conflicts which when installed effectively reduced a vast amount of conflicting movements; advised that at the School District's request staff has been working with the School officials to investigate the installation of lit electronic flashing school zone signs which are utilized on City streets, noting that Caltrans would not permit the installations on Winchester Road due to the device not being approved by Caltrans; noted that in May, of 2001, there was a fatality at this location which occurred on a Sunday evening (and was not associated with school pedestrian traffic) involving a small child who was crossing the street with his parents, clarifying that the child was struck by a vehicle which was out of control due to the driver being impaired due to a medical condition which rendered the driver unconscious; relayed that this type of accident was not caused due to the design of the intersection; advised that subsequent to the accident, the City Council appropriated approximately $400,000 last year in order to investigate the installation of a pedestrian crossing at this location, additionally noting that there have been additional monies pledged by developers to be utilized towards the funding of a pedestrian crossing; cladfied that this particular intersection was not owned, operated, or controlled by the City of Temecula, advising that this road was a State Highway and that Caltrans had full jurisdiction; noted that after numerous meetings (held between June of 2001 to November of 2001) with Caltrans officials, the City received a letter from Caltrans stating that certain criteria needed to be met in order for Caltrans to consider approving a pedestrian overcrossing, and that Caltrans did not support installation of a pedestrian crossing at this location due to the existing controls which were considered adequate with the existing conditions; relayed that after additional meetings with Caltrans, Caltrans took the position that although Caltrans would not support the crossing, there would be no objection to the City pursuing the installation of a crossing which could meet the dictated criteria; relayed that at this point the City has hired an engineering company to investigate avenues to meet the criteria (dictated by Caltrans), advising that this contract will be completed in six to eight weeks; and relayed that the study results would most likely be brought to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, in order for the Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council, Director of Public Works Hughes provided additional information regarding the constraints associated with the Pedestrian Bridge Project, as follows: · Queried the avenue to pursue which would effectively encourage pedestrians to utilize the pedestrian bridge, noting that the signalized intersection could not be closed for pedestrians; · Noted the likelihood of the majority of school students crossing without utilizing the bddge; · Advised that pedestrian crossings were generally successful when located in areas where there could be physical restraints from crossing elsewhere, which forced pedestrians to utilize an overpass; · Relayed that various options were bdng explored with the study (i.e., the installation of elevators, tunnel-type crossings); · Noted that the analysis had indicated that approximately 150-200 students cross in this area in the morning and again in the afternoon; provided additional information regarding the feasibility of installing an elevator which would meet the needed capacity for the pedestrian traffic which would only be present for a short period of time; · Relayed potential liability issues if certain crossing implementations were installed in this area; · Advised that future road improvements (i.e., transit structures) in this area may increase the span necessary for the crossing; and · Noted staffs concern regarding establishing a Citywide precedent, whereby residents will request that additional overcrossings be installed. Commissioner Coe commended staff for efforts regarding the investigation of this item. For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes noted one Councilmember's continuing concern regarding the location of the campus; advised that it was Caltrans' opinion, which he supported, that the existing provisions were adequate, that the visibility conditions were good, and that the signalized crossing as well as the school signage effectively benefited this area; opined that it was the drivers' and pedestrians' responsibility to be aware of how to utilize the facilities correctly, advising that the majority of accidents in these type of areas were not due to the fault of the design of a system, but caused by driver behavior or pedestrians not recognizing the significant danger that exists if the rules of the road are not followed; In response, Commissioner Coe opined that the City was wasting money by continuing to study an installation which will most likely not be feasible and not permitted by the State; and concurred with Director of Public Works Hughes' comments, that the impetus for maintaining safety was ddver and pedestrian awareness. Commissioner Katan noted that he looked forward to reviewing the results of the study. Providing the rationale for requesting that this issue be agendized, Commissioner Wedel ' noted the desire for infOrmation regarding the history of this issue as well as an update, advising that Director of Public Works Hughes presentation was comprehensive and educational, thanking staff for the presentation. For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the height of the overcrossing would be approximately 17 feet, advising that there may be a requirement to exceed the minimum height due to Winchester Road serving as an alternate route to the freeway. Commissioner Connerton commented on the necessary height and length of the overcrossing which would most likely render the project not feasible; and advised that utilizing these funds for alternate traffic solutions in the City would be more prudent. Director of Public Works Hughes noted the benefits of conducting the study due to staff being able to provide a recommendation after exhausting every possible solution; and advised that most likely there will be an accident at this location at some point in the future which most likely will be caused by a driver mistake or from an individual not practicing safe habits; reiterated staff's desire to explore this intersection thoroughly; and for informational purposes, noted that approximately half of the students crossing at this intersection (while he was observing) were being dropped off by their parents across the street from the school which was why they needed to cross this roadway to access the school MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Apprising the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted the positive feedback received from the residents regarding the stop signs which were installed on Vail Ranch. B. Via a video presentation, Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the crosswalk timer device, which was installed today (April 25, 2002) at Ynez Road/Motor Car Parkway as a test site (proximate to the Guidant use.) C. Per comments received at a recent City Council meeting, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be addressing speeding issues in the Promenade Chardonnay Hills area, advising that when the Commission last addressed this issue, Stage I of the Traffic Calming Program had been implemented; noted that one of the residents in this area desires to have stop signs installed, and that the Mayor has determined that since the issue was addressed approximately one year ago by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, that the Commission should re-agendize the matter. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT A. Providing an update, Police Sergeant Lohman relayed that up to this point in time during the month of April over 650 hazardous violations have been issued, 77 non-hazardous citations, 45 parking citations, 77 NET citations, and 60 SLAP citations; advised that the Enforce Responsible Alcohol Consumption in Temecula (ERAClT) operation was conducted on April 12th; noted that due to citizens complaining about excessive speeds in their neighborhoods radar trailers were placed at various locations, advising that software has been ordered to update the current radar trailer; and relayed that the Concerned Citizens Letter Writing Program was implemented which is a program whereby a citizen who witnesses unsafe driving behaviors can call or e-mail Police Sergeant Lohman, and subsequently a letter is sent to the driver, stating that they were observed violating certain codes, advising that 11 letters have been sent up to this point. B. Police Sergeant Lohrnan relayed that the Tip-a-Cop Program was scheduled for May 2, 2002, at the Claim Jumper Restaurant whereby off-duty Police Officers will help serve food in the interest of raising tips for the upcoming Special Olympics Event. C. For Commissioner Coe, Police Lieutenant Pingel relayed that in comparison to alternative cities within the County, the City of Temecula has fewer DUI arrests, as well as other serious incidents due to better driving behaviors in the City. D. Commissioner Connerton commended the Police Department for their excellent work, in particular regarding the ERACIT Program enforcement. E. For Commissioner Katan, Police Lieutenant Pingel relayed that roving patrols yielded more DUI citations than the DUI checkpoints. Commissioner Connerton opined that the DUI checkpoints served as an effective deterrent, Commissioner Wedel commenting on the good public relations created between the Police Department and the public at the checkpoints, commending the Police Officers. Police Sergeant Lohman confirmed, for Commissioner Coe, that the designated driver concept was effective in preventing accidents and fatalities. F. For Chairman Lanier, Police Lieutenant Pingel relayed that he would keep the Public/Traffic Safety Commission posted regarding the next Every Fifteen Minutes Program in order for the Commission to be involved in the program. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT A. Updating the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Fire Captain McBride noted that the laptop installations project in the Fire Vehicles was proceeding, noting that he anticipated the devices to be installed in approximately two months. B. Fire Captain McBride relayed that the Fire Department's website (which was part of the City's website) was being updated. C. For informational purposes, Fire Captain McBride advised that the fire season has begun. D. Apprising the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Fire Captain McBride noted that in the upcoming agenda packets the Public/Traffic Safety Commission would be receiving the Fire Department report which was prepared for the City Council. E. Fire Captain McBride relayed that the Western Days Event had been a success with no negative incidents (i.e., injuries, or sickness). COMMISSION REPORTS A. Commissioner Connerton requested that the area at Honors Ddve and the first street (as one is traveling east on Margarita Road) be an agendized issue due to the negative impact of the line of sight conditions. B. Noting that there was an asphalt ramp located on Margarita Road at Temecula Valley High School at the drop-off zone, Commissioner Connerton requested that staff investigate the matter of having the ramp removed. C. For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that while new concepts were often being explored that the City controls the traffic signals, advising that prior to the installation of strobes (by any agency) which interrupt the synchronization of the signals by any the City would have to be involved. D. Commissioner Connerton commended Senior Engineer Moghadam and Associate Engineer Gonzales for the well-prepared data associated with the KiD Committee recommendations which was on tonight's agenda. E. For Commissioners Katan and Connerton, Police Lieutenant Pingel advised that provisions for radio communications for the CAP team will be acquired after investigation, providing additional information regarding the restrictions associated with the matter; and for Chairman Lanier, and Commissioner Katan, noted that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission would be updated regarding this issue (i.e., via the Police Chief's Report.) F. Commissioner Katan recommended that the issue of increasing the public comment period of time be agendized. Senior Engineer Moghadam and Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the Chairman could extend the public comments time, if deemed necessary. Additional discussion ensued regarding this matter, and it was the consensus of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to agendize the issue, Commissioner Wedel requesting that staff provide a legal opinion at that time. G. For informational purposes, Commissioner Connerton provided the data and times of the Fiddler on the Roof play which Commissioner Coe would be starring in which was scheduled for May 9, 10, 11, and 12. H. Chairman Lanier noted that he would provide to staff, for distribution to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, information regarding the installation of speed bumps. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. L. Borok, 30476 Milano Road, commented on reducing traffic impacts, recommending that the schools implement a program whereby the star and release times would be staggered. R:~baffi cminutes~042502 12 ADJOURNMENT At 8:36 P.M. Chairman Lanier formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, May 23, 2002 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairman Scott Lanier Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: ~ Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic DATE: April 25, 2002 SUBJECT: Item 2 School Area Traffic Circulation - Requested By Kids In Danger (KID) Committee RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Direct Staffto continue imposing restricted hours/days of operation for construction activities around school sites; and 2.Recommend not to change the existing striping on Plo Pico Road in front of Sparkman Elementary School; and 3.Recommend that the present level of traffic control be maintained on Rancho Vista Road at Temecula Valley High School; and 4. Recommend that the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Avenida De La Reina be included on the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration of partial funding during the budget review process; and 5.Direct Staffto develop a special traffic signal timing plan to accommodate school peak hour traffic at the intersection of Margarita Road at Rancho Vista Road; and 6.Recommend that the present level of traffic control be maintaine4 at the intersection of Butterfield _ Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate S~eet; and 7.Recommend that the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate Street be included on the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration during the budget review process. , BACKGROUND: In'March 2002, staffreceived a-letter from Kids In Danger (KID) a committee of parents, requesting that the City address traffic circulation issues identified at various schools in the City of Temecula. The letter, which contained seven areas of concern, included potential solutions to the problems identified. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process and by mail. Margarita Middle School KID Concern: Construction at Margarita Middle School During Student Pick-up and Drop-OftTimes. KID Proposed Solution: City should inform contractors that construction is allowed only from 8:20 a.m. to 2:45p. m. and after 3:10 p.m.; allow construction on Saturdays and holidays if necessary. I r:\traffic\commissn\agenda~02\0425\KIDS Citywide Scheol Issues/ajp ~he City is very sensitive to parking and traffic circulation at school sites during student pick-up and drop-off times. In fact, staffcurrently requires that any construction work occurring in the public fight-of-way adjacent to school sites, be performed during restricted hours and days. Typically, it is staff's preference that construction work be performed during school holidays or on weekends. However, there are circumstances when construction schedules cannot accommodate these requirements. When this occurs, steps are taken to divid~ the construction activity into multiple phases of construction to minimize traffic circulation impacts. Additionally, weekend traffic at some schools is just as heavy as weekday traffic due to the City sponsored sports activities occurring on-site. This situation makes it very difficult to restrict construction work to ' weekends only without affecting on-street parking and traffic circulation during these activities. Moreover, since these activities usually last all day, the traffic impacts are over a longer period of time on the weekend than during the week, which are short-term impacts and usually affect only a short window of time in the moming and afternoon. Staff will continue to impose workday and work hour restrictions around school sites, construction schedules permitting, to eliminate conflicts between construction and school traffic. Sparkman Elementary School KID Concern: Bike Lane and parking constraints. KID Proposed Solution: Remove bike lane and relocate to a different street or change bike lane to dotted line in front of school. Last year, staffevaluated a similar request, which was generated by Sparkman Elementary School's Principal and Commissioner Edwards. Pio Pico Road, which is 44 feet wide curb to curb, presently accommodates a 10- foot left-turn lane, a 12-foot travel lane in each direction, and 5-foot bike lanes on each side of the roadway. The evaluation determined that even with the removal of the bike lanes, a 17-foot wide travel lane is not wide enough to safely accommodate on-street parking. In order to accommodate on-street parking in front of Sparkman Elementary School, the left-torn lane on Pio Pico Road would have to be removed. This is an option that would not, be supported by staff. The elimination of the left-turn lane would severely impact the traffic signal operation at Margarita Road as well as, the overall traffic circulation at Sparkman Elementa~ School. The left-mm lane provides storage for westbound left-mm movements at Margarita Road and eastbound left-turn movements at Calle'Redondella. In so far as the availability of parkingqoading areas at Sparkman Elementary School, an on-street loading area has been provided on Margarita Road adjacent to the school site. Loading and parking is also available on-site at the Margarita Road parking lot and Pio Pico Road parking lot. Additional on-street parking is available on Calle Redondella. For these reasons, staff does not recommend any changes to the existing striping. However, we would encourage the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) to explore other o~-site parking alternatives. Temecula Valley High School KID Concern: Heavy traffic during drop-off and pick-up times that causes congestion in the nearby intersection. KID Proposed Solution: Install 3-way stop sign at main exit to Rancho Vista, have school repaint parking lot arrows, have school add signs showing proper traffic flow around parMng lo~ Extend left-turn lane on Margarita Road at Rancho Vista Road. 2 r:~traffic\commissnXagenda~2002\0425\KIDS Cilywide School Issues/ajp In the past, both staff and the Public/Traffic Safety Commission have addressed similar issues regarding parking and circulation around Temecula Valley High School. In April 2000, staffmet with representatives of TVUSD and the high school to discuss on-site circulation issues and circulation issues on Rancho Vista Road. At that time, staff indicated that the installation of a traffic signal at the school's main access driveway alone, without on-site circulation modifications, would not resolve the circulation issues. Staff suggested that the district hire a professional Traffic Engineer to develop access alternatives that would address the district's concerns. Also, as a result of the meeting, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approved the extension of the white curb along Margarita Road to increase the on-street loading zone area. In March 2001, the City modified the existing striping along Rancho Vista Road to accommod/~te revised ingress/egress modifications to the high school. While we agree with the KID proposed solution that the school's on-site circulation needs to be revised to mitigate the impacts to Rancho Vista Road, we do not agree that a multi-way stop control would improve traffic circulation on Rancho Vista Road. Moreover, a multi-way stop control would be a full time traffic control device used to mitigate a condition that occurs twice a day for only a short period of time. During the remainder of the twenty-four (24) hours when the multi-way stop control is not needed to assign right-of-way, motorists will be forced to stop needlessly, which eventually promotes the violation of traffic control devices. It is staff's opinion that the only viable traffic control device at the school's main access driveway is a traffic signal along with modifications to the on-site circulation. Therefore, staff does not recommend the installation of a multi-way stop control on Rancho Vista Road. In so far as, extending the southbound left-turn lane on Margarita Road that is an option that can be explored. However, it is our opinion that the practical short-tcrm solution is to provide a special traffic signal timing plan during the morning and afternoon school peak hours to accommodate the heavy turning movements associated with those peaks. A similar plan was implemented at the intersection of Margarita Road and North General Kearny Road last year, which h~s improved traffic flow during the morning and afternoon school peak hours. For these reasons, staff is recommending the development of a special timing plan to accommodate the school related peak hour traffic. As previously mentioned the solution to reliving congestion at nearby intersections and improving traffic circulation at Temecula Valley Itlgh Schoolbegins with improvements to the high school parking lots. We strongly encourage TVUSD to pursue the modification of the on-site circulation to alleviate the off-site traffic congestion. Therefore, staff is recommending that the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Avenida De La Reina be added to the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration of partial funding during the budget review process. Chaparral High School KID Concern: Heavy congestion during pick-up and dmp-off times. KID Proposed Solution: Open additional exits from school parking lot to Winchester Road and restrlpe Winchester Road in front of school to add exit lane for cars leaving school ,4dd left-turn lane from Winchester Road to Margarita Road and vice-versa. Staff has reviewed the issue of additional left-turn lanes on Winchester Road at Nicolas Road and Margarita Road in the past. In April 2000, staff performed an evaluation of turning movement count data at the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. The data indicates that the volume, at the time, would warrant a dual left-turn lane at the intersection. However, the access road stripingwould have to be modified to accommodate the dual left-turn movements from Winchester Road into the school's parking lot. The access r:\traffic~commissnXagenda~002\0425\KlDS Citywid,e School Issues/ajp road is a private roadway under ownership of the TVUSD and the senior ho~sing complex. Any modifications to the roadway striping would have to be performed by TVUSD and approved by the owners of the senior housing complex. Staffcontacted district representatives and advised them of the results of the evaluation and subsequent needed improvements. The installation of the additional left4um lane cannot go forward unless the access road improvements are installed by TVUSD and the additional left-turn lane is approved by Caltrans. Currently, at the intersection of Winchester Road at Margarita Road there are dual left-mm lanes for every direction, except the eastbound to northbound left-mm movement which will be provided in the near future with the development of the Harveston project. The present width of Winchester Road cannot accommodate a third westbound left-turn lane as proposed by KID. Moreover, Margarita Road is presently striped for two southbound through lanes and is not wide enough to accommodate a third through lane to receive the additional left4um movement. Since Winchester Road is a state owned and maintained facility, any improvements on the state highway such as, additional driveways onto Winchester Road, modification to the existing striping, and the installation of additional left-mm lanes would require approval from Caltrans. Presently, a fight-turn egress is provided onto Winchester Road from the school's parking lot. It is unlikely that Caltrans will approve any additional driveway openings onto Winchester Road from Chaparral High School. Moreover, this is an alternative that staff will not support or recommend. In so far as a third left-mm lane from Winchester Road onto Margarita Road, it is not likely that Caltrans will support this type of improvement nor is it an improvement that staffwould support. Our own experience with attempting to implement a third northbound to westbound left-mm lane on Ynez Road at Winchester Road, which was unsueeesgful, indicates that Caltrans is not very receptive to the idea. This is at a location where left-turn vehicular volumes, during the majority of the day, justify a third left-mm lane, unlike Winchester Road at Margarita Road where the morning and afternoon school p~a~ last a short period of time and do not justify a third left-mm lane. For these reasons, staff does not support the KID proposed solutions. However, staff encourages the TVIJSD to pursue the implementation of an additional left-turn lane at Winchester Road and Nicolas Road through Caltrans along with the necessary modifications to the access road, and explore the possibility of providing access to Roripaugh Road through the construction zone on the north side of the high school facility. Vail Ranch Middle School KID Concern: Heavy congestion durlng pick-up and drop-ofttimes. KID Proposed Solution: Install 4-way stop sign, or temporary traffic signal at Butterfield Stage Road and Walton Way for use during entrance and exit times, or permanent signal at intersection. Shortly after the annexation of Vail Ranch, staff met with TVUSD representatives and the middle school principal to discuss circulation and parking issues on streets surrounding Vail Ranch Middle School. Staff received a request to modify traffic controls, curb markings and striping along Camino Piedra Rojo and Butterfield Stage Road adjacent to the middle school site. Traffic controls were added at the intersection of Camino ?iedra Rojo and Welton Way, curb markings were modified in front of the school and a southbound left-turn lane was installed on Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Chaote Street. It was also determined that there is approximately 500 feet of unrestricted on-street parking along Butterfield Stage Road directly adjacent to the school, north of Welton Way. On-street parking is also available south of Welton Way on the westside of Buttertield Stage Road. 4 r:\lraffic\commissnXagcnda~2002\0425XKIDS Citywide School Issues/ajp The possibility of installing a multi-way stop control or a traffic signal wa~ discussed at the meeting. It was agreed that the installation of a multi-way stop control would not alleviate the traffic congestion and that a full time multi-way stop control is not an appropriate device to mitigate a condition that occurs twice a day for a short period of time. During the remainder of the twenty-four (24) hours when the multi-way stop control is not needed to assign right-of-way, motorists will be forced to stop needlessly, which creates unnecessary delays and eventually promotes the violation of traffic control devices. Therefore, staff does not recommend the installation of a multi-way stop control at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate Street. Although a traffic signal will not completely alleviate the traffic congestion at this intersection, it is staffs opinion that a traffic signal is the only viable traffic control device, which does not stop traffic needlessly and create unnecessary delays on Butterfield Stage Road. The use of a temporary traffic signal during peak school times is not an option that staff would support. Therefore, staff is recommending that the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate Street be added to the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration during the budget review process. Since the east side of Butterfield Stage Road lies within th9 unincorporated county area, County of Riverside approval and participation in the cost of the traffic signal installation will be necessary. Location of School Sites KID Concern: Schools are located on busy commuter street& KID Proposed Solutiot~: Proper planning requires that schools be located away from commuter streets or that they be designed with driveways long enough to enable parents to safely drop-off or pick-up their children, and with a safe, unobstructed return to commuter street& Both staffand the Public/Traffic Safety Commission share this concern. To that end, the Commission has appointed a representative to act as the Commission's liaison to improve communication and coordination between the City and the TVUSD. This has resulted in improved coordination during the facility planning process. Staff concurs with the KID proposed solutions and encourages the TVUSD to consider the viability of the solutions during the facility planning process. Crossing Guards in the City of Temecula KID Cqncern: There are few crossing guards in Temecula. KID Proposed Solutlon: Seekfundingforadditional crossing guards. As the Commission is aware, the TVUSD is responsible for providing adult crossing guards at the various school sites throughout the City. It is our opinion that the TVUSD is doing a "good job" of keeping up with the growing demand for adult crossing guards thrOUghout the district considering the limited resources they have to work with. Staff concurs with the KID proposed solution and encourages the TVIJSD and KID committee to explore available funding mechanisms. An interim solution that could be explored with the district is the possibility of using KID committee members on a voluntary basis, to provide adult crossing guard services at various locations throughout the City. 5 r: ~tra ~c\commissnhagenda~2002~0425\KI DS Citywide School lssues/ajp The traffic issues identified by the KID committee are common m almost every school in the City of Temecula and for that matter in Southern California. Commonly, the lack of on-site parking and on-site circulation are the primary causes of traffic congestion around school sites. Secondly, there is the issue of over-saturation of intersections and roadways during a short period of time caused by parents taking their children to and from school. The final cause of traffic congestion is the total disregard for the roles of the road by some parents when loading and unloading children. Staff encourages the KID committee to take a pro-active role in helping to mitigate some of the congestion issues they identified by encouraging parents and members to carpool when taking children to and from school. This will help reduce vehicular volumes around school sites and improve parking. Also, encourage parents to be more courteous and observe the rules of the road when picking-up and dropping- offchildren. The elimination of double parking and illegal turning movements, along with the expression of common courtesy can "go a long way" in reducing traffic congestion and providing for the safety of children around school sites. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Letter from Kids In Danger (KID) 6 r: \ir a ffic\commissnXage nd a~2002',B425 \KI DS Citywid¢ School Issues/ajp EXHIBIT "C" MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software 02/20/03 Major Street: Butterfield Stage Road Minor Street: Welton Way/Channel Street Date of Analysis: 02/20/03 Name of Analyst: Case Number: Comments: 85th% Speed of Major Street: 50 WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMRY: WARRANT 1 - Accident Experience NOT SATISFIED - The accident warrant of 5 or more reportable accidents of a correctable type is not met with 0 accidents over a 12 month period. WARRANT 2 - Minimum Traffic Volumes SATISFIED - The 100% vehicular warrant of 500 entering vehicles for any 8 hours of the day is met with 10 hours meeting the warrant. SATISFIED The 70% vehicular warrant of 350 entering vehicles for any 8 hours of the day is met with 14 hours meeting the warrant. WARRANT 3 - Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic from Minor Road SATISFIED The combined total of 200 vehicles and pedestrians from the minor approach is met with 6 hours meeting the warrant. Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software 02/20/03 100% 70% COMBINATION START NB SB EB WB HOUR WARRANT WARRANT WARPJtNT TIME TOT MET MET MET 0:00 7 22 3 3 35 1:00 3 9 4 2 18 2:00 7 6 1 2 16 3:00 7 7 3 1 18 4:00 19 10 26 18 73 5:00 50 25 38 34 147 6:00 78 218 48 48 392 * 7:00 178 361 113 91 743 * * * 8:00 167 382 127 120 796 * * * 9:00 116 214 97 78 505 * * 10:00 57 186 55 69 367 * 11:00 69 204 73 90 436 * 12:00 78 281 60 82 501 * * 13:00 76 249 90 102 517 * * 14:00 115 435 144 125 819 * * * 15:00 142 439 172 185 938 * * * 16:00 98 370 124 100 692 * * * 17:00 159 416 153 81 809 * * * 18:00 79 338 79 58 554 * * 19:00 59 256 45 31 391 * 20:00 22 184 27 21 254 21:00 32 128 18 10 188 22:00 15 65 13 7 100 23:00 4 44 4 5 57 ITEM NO. 4 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic DATE: February 27, 2003 SUBJECT: Item 4 Promenade Chardonnay Hills - Multi-Way Stop Signs RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission continue the discussion of the Promenade Chardonnay Hills request for Multi-Way Stop Signs. BACKGROUND: Staff is continuing to review the options and obtain concurrence of the Promenade Chardonnay Hills Home Owners Association. Director Hughes met with the Home Owners Association on February 6th to receive additional input from the Association and he intends to meet with their representative again to present the City's suggestions before the February 27t~ Commission meeting. A verbal report will be delivered at the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: None. 1 r :\tra ffie~commissn~agenda~2003\0227~coraenade ChaTdonnay follow up~ajp ITEM NO. 5 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic DATE: February 27, 2003 SUBJECT: Item 5 Temecula Citizen Corps Program RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission appoint one Commissioner to assist each Temecula Citizen Corps area, and appoint the Public/Traffic Safety Commission Chairman to oversee all areas. BACKGROUND: This item has been placed on the agenda for discussion at the request of Chairman Connerton. This program currently has over 30 registered volunteers and an ongoing recruitment effort. As discussed previously the Commission plays a valuable roll as ambassadors to the Program. This discussion can help further provide structure to that roll. A representative from the Police Department is available to provide additional information, if necessary. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Temecula Citizens Corp. December 10, 2002 /~City Highways mis map ,~ r~de ~y U~ my o~ Te~a ~=~lc ~ Centedine p~u~ ~ ~ ~de ~ ~s ~ ITEM NO. 6 TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City ManagedCity Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 25, 2003 SUBJECT: Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of January, 2003. MOACTRPT.FRM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report January ! February 2003 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: December February 25, 2003 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Extension - Environmental Mitigation This project will create approximately 1.49 acres of wetlands along Murrieta Creek at First Street. It includes construction of landscaping and irrigation improvements, and maintenance of said improvements for a period of five (5) years in accordance with California Department of Fish and Game and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit requirements. ACOE and RCFC are requesting the relocation of the mitigation site to avoid conflict with Murrieta Creek Improvement Project. A letter was sent from the City to ACOE for possible alternate mitigation site. The City received a response from ACOE approving the relocation of mitigation site. Research is underway to acquire an alternate site. 2. Community Theatre - Mercantile Seismic Retrofit This project will create a community theatre at the old Mercantile building in downtown Temecula. 2H Construction began construction on Monday, September 16, 2002. Construct[on of the structural braced frames are complete with foundation and sub floor upgrades underway. 3. Children's Museum This project will construct a 7,500 square foot children's museum. The contract was awarded at the September 17, 2002, City Council meeting to R.E. Fleming Construction. The contractor is proceeding with completion of the new entry gazebo, porch railing and roof. The HVAC units have been set and the contractor will be constructing screens for the visible units. Repair and retrofit of the foundation system on the east side of the building wilt begin February 24. The City entered into a separate contract with 2H Construction to complete the repairs to the foundation. The foundation repair work is expected to be completed by the middle of May 2003. 4. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Sound Wall Improvements Under this project, sound walls will be designed and constructed on the southwest side of Pechanga Parkway, from Rainbow Canyon Road to the Pechanga casino and on the northeast side along the residences just north of Loma Linda Nine construction bids were received on February 4, 2003 and the contract will be awarded at the February 25, 2003 City Council meeting. The apparent Iow bidder is R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc. Construction will begin in March 2003. Work is being coordinated with the Pechanga Parkway Phase il Improvements. R:~VlonthlyActivity Repot t\C1P~2003klanua~.doc PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS None PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Improvements - Phase II (SR 79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) to its ultimate width from the Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Pechanga mad. The City is currently working with Caltrans' Local Assistance and City's Environmental Consultant to expedite the environmental approval process. The Preliminary Environmental Document Classification (NEPA) of the project has been determined to be an "Environmental Assessment" (EA). Required technical studies (involving Federal action) will be included in the EA. The consultant submitted 95% drainage design plans to RCFC & WCD for review the week of February 10, 2003. RCFC & WCD will respond to the latest submittal within one month. The City received 90% street plans and specifications from DMJM-Harris and staff is currently reviewing them along with the utility companies. 2. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek This project will widen Rancho California Road Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide four additional traffic lanes. Staff is currently working with the design consultant to make final revisions to the drawings and specifications. The proiect is scheduled to be advertised for bids by early March 2003. 3. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resoumes and services. A separate pamel has been created for the library for bond purposes. The application to the State was submitted on 6/13/02. The City's application was not among the approved ones. The City will be resubmitting for the second round of funding approvals later this year. Construction is delayed until Spring 2004, provided that the City receives funding. Utility services construction will be coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II Street Improvements. 4. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The City has reviewed the 100% Design Plans submitted by the consultant. Specifications are under review. Plans were sent to all utilities and utility issues are being addressed. Environmental documents have been finalized by the City Planning Department and the public comments period will begin next month. Work is being coordinated with the library project. 5. John Warner Road Assessment District - Hydrology Study Under this project a drainage study will be done to compliment the improvement plans being done by the property owners. Eventually the City will be the oversight agency for a property owners 2 R:'&I onthlyActiviVjRepoxl\ClP~2003XJanua~.doc sponsored assessment district. An agreement amendment was approved by City Council on October 8, 2002. ERSC submitted a revised hydrology study with storm drain alternatives on 10/30/02. The City chose a preferred alternative and directed ERSC to prepare the final Storm Drain plans and the Engineer's Cost Estimate, Final Design Documents are expected in Mamh for City's review. 6. Landscaping and Sidewalk On SR 79 South (Front Street to Pechanga Parkway) The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk, landscaping, and irrigation along State Route 79 South between Pechanga Parkway and Old Town Front Street Review of 1 st plan submittal is complete. However, the project scope was modified. The modifications were incorporated into 60% submittal, and the p~ans were re-submitted to Caltrans. Caltrans tentatively approved the plans, and final revisions are being made. HOA has tentatively approved the planting layout. 90% plans were submitted. The Civil plans are being revised and we are finalizing planting plans. 7. Temecula Sports Complex A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built at the corner of Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow Way. The City Council approved the Conceptual Master Plan of the project and funding at the January 14, 2003 meeting. RJM, the landscape amhitect, is to develop the construction drawings. Existing facility maps for Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow Way have been received from utility companies. 8. Bridge Barrier Rail Upgrade, Rainbow Canyon Road over Pechanga Creek/Del Rio Road over Empire Creek This project will replace the existing barrier rails of the Rainbow Canyon Bridge over Pechanga Creek and the Del Rio Road Bridge over Empire Creek. Simon Wong Engineering (SWE) delivered the 100% Plans and the Engineer's Cost Estimate in early October. The Specifications are complete. The request for authorization for construction funding was sent to Caltrans on 1/14/03. 9. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site A fire station will be built at the Wolf Creek Site. The Plans have been approved with exception of grading plans. Waiting for parcel to be recorded and APN so an address can be assigned and utility services finalized. 10. Pavement Management System Update The project will establish a pavement management program that will provide an on-going schedule of needed repairs and provide data that will be used to prepare budget estimates required to complete the scheduled work. GIS links, AutoCAD review, and updates to MicroPAVER are included in the total program. The consultant will submit the final pavement study to the City the week of February 18, 2003. 11. Vail Ranch Park (Near Pauba Valley School) - Add Amenities This project will add amenities, including play equipment to the recently annexed Vail Ranch Park. RHA Landscape Architects/Planners Inc. is the design firm. First submittal was made on May 3rd. The City reviewed these documents and returned them to the consultant for revisions. The City and RHA met on 7/31/02 to discuss these comments and revisions are being made. Soil samples were taken and results were provided to TCSD on 8/28/02. The City reviewed the grading plan and 3 R:'dvl onthlyActivityRepor t\C lPX2003~Ianuary.doc transmitted comments back to the consultant. Once the grading plan is completed the design documents will be finalized. 12. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail This project will build portions of the equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek within City limits. The City has received a federal grant of $1,214,000. Caltrans has given the City the "Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering." The City has determined the most qualified consultant based on the interviews held on November 19, 2002. The City is currently in contract negotiation with the chosen consultant. 13. State Route 79 South Medians Under this project medians will be constructed on State Route 79 South within the City of Temecula limits. A Request For Proposal (RFP) was sent out to consultants during the week of November 4, 2002. Responses have been received. Staff reviews of proposals have been completed. Consultant contacted and negotiations are proceeding. 14. Guardrail Installation and Replacement On Rainbow Canyon Road In this project, old guardrails will be replaced and new guardrails will be installed in needed locations on Rainbow Canyon Road within the City of Temecula. The RFP for design has been prepared but must be approved by Caltrans prior to publishing. The request for RFP approval and design funding was submitted to Caltrans on 11/06/02. The City's Planning Department has prepared the required environmental documents. A Field Review for the project with Caltrans was conducted on February 19, 2003. 15. Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping Under this project, 10,000 square feet remnant parcel west of Front Street, which was created by the realignment of First Street, will be landscaped Project plans have been reviewed and are back to Architect for corrections. 16. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. City staff is currently designing the project. City staff is currently designing the project. Street and landscaping design completion is scheduled for May 2003. A signal at the intersection of Diaz and Rancho Way has been added and is currently under design. Right of Way processing is anticipated to be completed by May of 2003. 17. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center The project will include the closing of the hvo median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. The design is 100% complete. This project is being combined with PW00-20, which includes a right turn lane eastbound on Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Combining the design of the two projects will be completed by late March with bidding by late March 2003. 18. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes) This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of 4 R:'dVionthlyAcfi vityReporfiC IP~2003~Jan uary.doc way acquisition at the northeast corner of Rancho California and Ynez is in process with Claim Jumper Restaurant and Swedish American Corporation signing the acquisition agreements. However, Swedish American Corporation is failing to respond to escrow instructions, and it appears that we will have to acquire this property through eminent domain. This will delay the project. Construction is anticipated to begin summer of 2003. Design is 90% complete. This project will be combined with PW00-02. 19. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson This project will widen Winchester road between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson Avenue. It will also add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. Project layout was plotted and discussed with Traffic and the Director of Public Works. In- house design continues, with recent modifications to the design being implemented. 20. Rancho California Sports Park ADA Access and Shade Structure This project entails the design and construction of ADA compliant concrete walkways to the remaining ball fields, 3,4,5,7 & 8. It will also include the installation of two shade picnic/seating areas adjacent to the snack bar building. Design work is 95% complete. Currently, the second plan submittal is being revised. Specifications are being finalized and have been submitted for review. Specification and plan revisions are complete. We anticipate advertising for construction in March 2003. 21. Bus Bench Upgrades Under this project, bus benches and shade structures will be installed and existing ones will be upgraded at various locations. Project research on locations of current bus stops, existing bus bench/shade structures, bus bench/shade structure costs and RTA routes is complete. Bus bench/shade structure design and location options were reviewed and a report with recommendations is being prepared. 22. Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - Phase II This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from south of Overland Drive to Rancho California Road. The rehabilitation will include pavement overlay, and road and driveway reconstruction. Staff is in the process of hiring a surveying and a soils firm to provide topographic maps and pavement analysis for this project. Once the consultant completes the maps, staff will begin the design. 23. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - FY 2002/2003 Staff is reviewing the Pavement Management Report prepared by Berryman & Henigar to ascertain which street sections should be repaired with the available budget for this project. It was recommended, based on that report to repair westbound Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Meadows Parkway. Capital Projects is proceeding with preparing plans and specifications for that section of road. 5 R:'xMonthlyActivityRepor t~C1PX2003XJanuary.d~c PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE 1. 1-15! SR 79 South Interchange - Project Study Report (PSR) This project will modify the 1-15/SR 79 South Interchange to accommodate projected future traffic. The City received the final Value Engineering Analysis Report from Caltrans on May 8, 2002. All the proposed alignments presented by the value analysis team were rejected. The City's consultant provided an alignment modification with supporting traffic data to Caltrans on 10/02/02. Caltrans provided comments and the consultant addressed those comments and sent a response to Caltrans. Caltrans approved the proposed modified alternative #5. However, they proposed an interim solution that includes the construction of a roundabout. The City met with Caltrans on February 6, 2003 to discuss this new concept. We are evaluating this new concept and we will be responding to Caltrans shortly. 2. French Valley Parkway Overcrossing and Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Preparation This project will construct an interchange between Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/~-215 split. The City's consultant will be providing the City a Project Report (PR), and Environmental Documents (ED) for this first phase of the design process. This project will include the southbound off-ramp to Jefferson Avenue. On January 14, 2002, the City Council approved the design contract with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers. Monthly Project Design Team meetings will be starting on February 26, 2003. 3. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. PDC has completed the alignment study and staff has reviewed copies of the preliminary plans. Staff has reviewed design costs for next year's fiscal funding. No funding until FY04-05. 4. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula City Limits and Diaz Road Extension This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murrieta Creek crossing between Winchester Road and the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Riverside County Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. The Consultant and Staff met with Riverside County Flood Control to discuss possible alignments. The consultant is currently awaiting data from Riverside County Flood Control in order to complete the work on the first draft of the alignment study. Staff was informed this data could take up to a year to receive (from May 2002). 6 R:'dVlonthlyActivityRepor t\C IP~2003XJanuaxy.doc PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON-HOLD 1. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit romp for Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is revisiting the merits of this proiect in light of the Project Study Report for French Valley Parkway Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to accommodate the new Interchange. This project is suspended indefinitely. 2. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Project is on hold. Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing troffic volumes. Design is 50% complete. A developer will be doing this project. 3. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II Project is on hold. This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and Felix Valdez. The developer of a nearby property may be designing and constructing this project. 4. School Site ADA Improvements Project has been removed from this year's ClP. Design and construct ADA concrete walkways and hand railing to athletic facilities at Temecula Middle School, James L. Day Middle School and Margarita Middle School. TCSD re-allocated the funds. 5. City Hall Parking Lot Modifications Project is on-hold. Funding has been postponed until FY 2004/2005. Under this project, a security fence will be installed between the existing maintenance facility and the western side of City Hall to secure the parking lot west of the main building. The design of a security fence between the existing maintenance facility and the western side of City Hall will be performed in-house. A scoping meeting was held on November 12, 2001. Research on existing base maps for the proposed area and as-builts for the existing security fence near the maintenance facility is complete. Design and review of the proposed layout is complete. The project is currently on hold waiting for further direction 7 R:hMonthlyActivityRepoffiC h~2003~January.doc MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: ~q/) Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: February 5, 2003 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - January, 2003 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of January, 2003: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 125 B. Total signs installed 18 C. Total signs repaired 142 I1. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 22 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 2,741 B. Total Tons 64 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 212 V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement - 0 - VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 49 B. Total S.F. 2,762 VII. STENCILING A. 290 New and repainted legends B. 100 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 63 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 46 service order requests for the month of December, 2002. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 48 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of January, 2003 was $ 44,035.70 compared to ~ 85,532.50 for the month of December, 2002. Account No. 5402 $ 37,435.70 Account No. 5401 $ 4,500.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ 2,100.00 cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer (ClP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer (Land Development) R:\MAINTAIN\MOACTR PT~IU LY 2002- JUNE 2003~JANUARY 03.DOC CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF JANUARY, 2003 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 01/02/03 McCABE AT CAMINO ALACON REMOVED 14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 44515 BEDFORD COURT REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 15 FWY AT 79 SO. REMOVED 184 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 MARGARITA PARK (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 37 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 MARGARITA AT PASEO BRILLANTE REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REMOVED 23 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 MARGARITA AT SOLANA REMOVED 14 $.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 29604 MARGARITA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 MARGARITA AT OVERLAND REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 MARGARITA AT SOLANA REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/06/03 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REMOVED 91 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/07/03 McCABE AT CAM1NO ALAGON REMOVED 36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/07/03 MEADOWS PARKWAY AT PAUBA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/08/03 MORAGA REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/08/03 MARGARITA AT SANTA GEP,.TRUDIS REMOVED 1,207 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/0903 27326 JEFFERSON REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/09/03 27314 JEFFERSON REMOVED 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/09/03 27536 YNEZ REMOVED 214 S.F. OF GRAFFIT1 01/09/03 28100 JEFFERSON REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/09/03 1-15 FWY AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 48 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/09/03 42210 REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/09/03 40435 WINCHESTER REMOVED 9 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/13/03 WINCHESTER AT SANTA GERTRUDIS REMOVED 130 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/13/03 WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/14/03 39610 RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/14/03 BIKE TRAIL AT CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL REMOVED 32 S.F. OF GRAFFITI DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 01/14/03 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/14/03 26730 YNEZ COURT REMOVED 180 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/17/03 SPORTS PARK REMOVED 80 S.F, OF GRAFFITI 01/21/03 RANCHO VISTA AT ARGO REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/22/03 LONG CANYON CREEK PARK REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/22/03 42101 MORAGA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF G1LAFFITI 01/23/03 29766 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 34 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/23/03 29740 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 21 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/24/03 29566 PUJOL (6 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 58 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/24/03 TROTSDALE REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/27/03 28816 PUJOL REMOVED 96 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/27/03 YNEZ AT WINCHESTER 1EEMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/27/03 41005 WINCHESTER REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 01/28/03 TEMECULA LANE AT CANTERFIELD REMOVED 56 S.F. OF GRAFFIT! 01/30/03 OIVERLAND AT PROMENADE WAY REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 2~762 TOTAL LOCATIONS 49 ITEM NO. 7 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT f APPROVAL ClTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic~jJ~/J DATE: January 25, 2003 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during January 2003. The Police Department responded to 27 "priority one" calls for service during the month of January, with an average response time of approximately 5.3 minutes. A total of 3,733 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During January, the Temecula Police Department's Town Center Storefront served a total of 166 customers. Forty-seven sets of fingerprints were taken, 14 people filed police reports and five people had citations signed off. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events, neighborhood watch and community-oriented programs during the month. He also coordinated requests for patrol ride-alongs. Additionally, he continued to provide residential and business security surveys/visits and past crime follow-up. Officer Fanene also continued to process City Planning Department submissions of site plans/conditions. The POP Teams continued their Warrant Apprehension Program during January, which resulted in five felony and four misdemeanor warrant arrests. They also issued 25 citations for various traffic violations. POP Teams also continued with the homeless persons program, with the goal of assisting homeless in finding services and aid to help them. The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP teams and a location to assist the public with police services. This has greatly increased their accessibility and their ability to serve the Old Town area. During January, the Old Town Storefront served 276 customers. Twenty-six sets of fingerprints were taken, 16 reports were written, and 14 citations were signed off, The traffic team reported that during the month of January there were 684 citations issued for hazardous violations, 189 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 106 parking citations were issued. During the month there were 20 injury traffic collisions, 72 non-injury collisions were reported and 31 drivers were arrested for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in 170 citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The SLAP program (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in 55 citations being issued. Monthly Departmental Report - Police Department 1 During the month of January, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 86 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the month, calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on four felony and six misdemeanor cases. Officers McEIvain and Rupe continued to provide training to security staff during the month. The mall officers continued to work on vehicle theft and burglary programs. No vehicle thefts, and only one vehicle burglary occurred during the month of January. Our five school resoume officers have remained active during January. The school resource officers conducted many counseling sessions with students. A total of 36 investigations/reports were conducted/written by the school resource officers during January. The school resoume officers also made four arrests for various misdemeanor crimes during January. These crimes ranged from possession of marijuana to burglary to drunk in public. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enfomement Program) continues to be a success in part through its Youth Court program. Officer Michelle Medeiros conducted the 104th Youth Court session. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools when needed and conducted follow-ups with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. During January, Officer Medeiros made two misdemeanor arrests of juveniles for being drunk in public. Officer Medeiros also worked with "at risk" juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. She assisted the Riverside County District Attorney's Office and Probation Department by providing training during home visits with incorrigible/at risk juveniles during the month of January. During the month of January, the Special Enforcement Team (SET Team) of Officers Jon Wade and Michelle Larson made seven misdemeanor and five felony arrests, primarily for namotics violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a proactive basis, recovering quantities of methamphetamine and marijuana during the month. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Bob Ridley and assistant coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 502 hours of service in January. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and telephone answering duties. Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program volunteers have begun their activities, patrolling the city for graffiti, conducting vacation residential checks and assisting patrol with special logistical needs and special events. Other duties these volunteers will attend to are business checks and abandoned vehicles and traffic control. The goal of the program is high visibility, which prevents crime from occurring. CAP Team members contributed 269 hours of service to the community during the month of January. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 190 hours specifically on patrol in Temecula during January. Monthly Departmental Report- Police Department 2