Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19-30 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 19-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 11) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA19-0408)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City Council of the City of Temecula certified the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") on December 17, 2002. B. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 11) was approved by the City Council on November 26, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-112. Amendment No. 1 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) was approved on January 1l, 2005 by the adoption of Resolution No. 05-08. Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) was approved on February 28, 2006 by the adoption of Resolution No. 06-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) was approved on March 8, 2016 by the adoption of Resolution No. 16-17. Amendment No. 4 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP- 11) was approved on January 23, 2018 by the adoption of Resolution No. 18-08. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-4 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan". C. On March 8, 2019, Woodside Homes and Wingsweep Corporation filed Planning Application No. PAI9-0408, a Specific Plan Amendment in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. 'the Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. On November 20, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. F. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 19- recommending to the City Council that the Addendum No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report be approved. Resolution No. 19- is hereby incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.020, the Planning Commission, in recommending that the City Council approve Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed specific plan amendment is consistent with the general plan and development code. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan discusses, at length, the consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan does not make any material changes to the Specific Plan that would impact the consistency findings set forth in the Specific Plan. The findings of consistency contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan are applicable and are incorporated herein by this reference. The General Plan's Land Use Element Goal 1 is to have a complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan creates unified, cohesive neighborhoods, and a neighborhood -level commercial center. In addition to these land uses, the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan provides neighborhood amenities, as well as open space and recreational facilities. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan is also consistent with the City's development code because the City will require that all new construction comply with the City's design and building standards. B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the Specific Plan clearly defines land uses, and establishes development standards, regulations and building criteria for each land use type. The proposed reduced setbacks add to the development standards and regulations and the Municipal Services CFD language does not change the number of approved lots or the size of the lots within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Area. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject property area has already been rough graded and erosion control/water quality management improvements were installed on site except in the habitat conservation area to be preserved along the Santa Gertrudis Creek for the land uses identified by the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the property is physically suitable for the anticipated land use developments. D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. With the reduced setbacks and Municipal Services CFD language the lot sizes and number of lots within the Specific Plan will remain unchanged from what was previously approved which allows the character of the neighborhood to remain. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20(h day of November, 2019. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTES Watson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 19-30 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2011" day of November, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: &zaps i Luke Watson Secretary PC DRAFT RESOLUTION SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT PC RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 11) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 19-0408)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City Council of the City of Temecula certified the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") on December 17, 2002. B. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. I1) was approved by the City Council on November 26, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-112. Amendment No. 1 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) was approved on January 11, 2005 by the adoption of Resolution No. 05-08. Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) was approved on February 28, 2006 by the adoption of Resolution No. 06-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) was approved on March 8, 2016 by the adoption of Resolution No. 16-17. Amendment No. 4 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP- 11) was approved on January 23, 2018 by the adoption of Resolution No. 18-08. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-4 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan". C. On March 8, 2019, Woodside Homes and Wingsweep Corporation filed Planning Application No. PA19-0408, a Specific Plan Amendment in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. On November 20, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. F. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 19- recommending to the City Council that the Addendum No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report be approved. Resolution No. 19- is hereby incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.020, the Planning Commission, in recommending that the City Council approve Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed specific plan amendment is consistent with the general plan and development code. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan discusses, at length, the consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan does not make any material changes to the Specific Plan that would impact the consistency findings set forth in the Specific Plan. The findings of consistency contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan are applicable and are incorporated herein by this reference. The General Plan's Land Use Element Goal I is to have a complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses. The Roripaugh Project creates unified, cohesive neighborhoods, and a neighborhood -level commercial center. In addition to these land uses, the Roripaugh Project provides neighborhood amenities, as well as open space, schools and recreational facilities. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan is also consistent with the City's development code because the City will require that all new construction comply with the City's design and building standards. B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, .safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the Specific Plan clearly defines-land--uses,—and establishess-development-standards regulationsand-building criteria for each land use type. These regulations, which include land use intensities, setback requirements, lighting and landscaping standards, and signage regulations, contribute toward the protection of proposed residential neighborhoods in the area as well as some reduction of possible negative impacts to adjacent properties. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject property area has already been rough graded and erosion control/water quality management improvements were installed on site except in the habitat conservation area to be preserved along the Santa Gertrudis Creek for the land uses identified by the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the property is physically suitable for the anticipated land use developments. D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The lot sizes within the Specific Plan area are not changing from what was previously approved which allows the character of the neighborhood to remain. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20'h day of November, 2019. ATTEST: Luke Watson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Gary Watts, Chairman I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 19- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20'h day of November, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. 20- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 11) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 19-0408) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS• Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 11) was approved by the City Council on November 26, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-112. Amendment No. I to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) was approved on January 11, 2005 by the adoption of Resolution No. 05-08. Amendment No. 2 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) was approved on February 28, 2006 by the adoption of Resolution No. 06-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 1 I) was approved on March 8, 2016 by the adoption of Resolution No. 16-17. Amendment No. 4 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP-11) was approved on January 23, 2018 by the adoption of Resolution No. 18-08. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-4 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan". B. On March 8, 2019, Woodside Homes and Wingsweep Corporation filed Planning Application No. PA19-0408, a Specific Plan Amendment in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan would update and modify those standards including an update to the development standards for a rear yard setback reduction from 20 feet to 10 feet for Planning Areas 18C, 20A, and 24, a rear yard setback reduction from 15 feet to 10 feet for Planning Areas 22 and 23A only if the planning areas are developed as age qualified homes and add new language on the timing of City Services Deficit Payments while not increasing the number of dwelling units previously approved within the Specific Plan. D. On November 20, 2019 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 19- recommending to the City Council that the Addendum No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report be approved. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 19- recommending that the proposed Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) be approved. F. On January 14, 2020 the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and Addendum No. 5 to the Final Environment Impact Report for the Project, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Addendum No. 5 to the Final Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the public hearing. G. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 20- certifying the Addendum No. 5 to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Project. H. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Specific Plan (SP 11) hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed specific plan amendment is consistent with the general plan and development code. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan discusses, at length, the consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan does not make any material- changes to the Specific Plan that would -impact the consistency findings set forth in the Specific Plan. The findings of consistency contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan are applicable and are incorporated herein by this reference. The General Plan's Land Use Element Goal 1 is to have a complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses. The Roripaugh Project creates unified, cohesive neighborhoods, and a neighborhood -level commercial center. In addition to these land uses, the Roripaugh Project provides neighborhood amenities, as well as open space, schools and recreational facilities. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan is also consistent with the City's development code because the City will require that al! new construction comply with the City's design and building standards. B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the Specific Plan clearly defines land uses, and establishes development standards, regulations and building criteria for each land use type. These regulations, which include land use intensities, setback requirements, lighting and landscaping standards, and signage regulations, contribute toward the protection of proposed residential neighborhoods in the area as well as some reduction of possible negative impacts to adjacent properties. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject property area has already been rough graded and erosion control/water quality management improvements were installed on site except in the habitat conservation area to be preserved along the Santa Gertrudis Creek for the land uses identified by the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the property is physically suitable for the anticipated land use developments. D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The lot sizes within the Specific Plan area are not changing from what was previously approved which allows the character of the neighborhood to remain. Section 3. Approval of Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11). The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Amendment No. 5 to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP 11) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of January, 2020. ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ss , Mayor I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 20- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of January, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT Rorip. augh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 November 7, 2019 VOLUME I The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 November 7, 2019 VOLUME I PREPARED FOR: RORIPAUGH VALLEY RESTORATION, LLC 4675 MacAurthur Court 15th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel. (949) 255-2680 PREPARED BY: RICK RICK Community Planning 5620 Friars Road San Diego, CA 92110 TABLE OF CONTENTS ES Executive Summary ES-1 SECTION 1 1.0 General Plan Consistency 1-1 1.0.1 Land Use Element 1-1 1.0.2 Circulation Element 1-2 1.0.3 Housing Element...... .................................. 1-3 1.0.4 Open Space and Conservation Element 1-4 1.0.5 Growth Management/Public Facilities Element 1-5 1.0.6 Public Safety Element 1-7 1.0.7 Noise Element 1-7 1.0.8 Air Quality Element 1-8 1.0.9 Community Design Element 1-8 1.0.10 Economic Development Element ...................... .......... 1-9 1.0.11 General Plan Conformance 1-10 1.1 Growth Management Strategies And Action Plan 1-11 1.1.1 Growth Management Strategies and Action Plan 1-11 1.1.2 City Services Deficit Payment 1-13 1.2 Implementation Program 1-15 1.2.1 Summary of Implementation Program 1-15 SECTION 2 2.0 Specific Plan Components 2-1 2.0.1 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2-1 2.0.2 Circulation Master Plan 2-17 2.0.3 Drainage and Water Quality Master Plan 2-58 2.0.4 Water Master Plan 2-68 2.0.5 Sewer Master Plan 2-74 2.0.6 Grading Master Plan ................................................... 2-80 2.0.7 Phasing Master Plan ........ ....... 2-98 2.0.8 Open Space and Recreational Master Plan 2-02 2.0.9 Landscape Master Plan 2-111 2.0.10 Walls and Fences Master Plan 2-20 2.0.11 Utilities Plan and Public Services 2-150 2.0.12 Offsite Improvements 2-153 SECTION 1 3.0 Plateau Neighborhood Planning Area Descriptions And Development Standards 3-1 3.0.1 Planning Areas lA and 1B.. 3-1 3.0.2 Planning Area 2 3-7 3.0.3 Planning Area 3 3-11 3.0.4 Planning Area 4A and 4B 3-17 3.0.5 Planning Area 5 3-23 3.0.6 Planning Area 6 ... .............. 3-27 3.0.7 Planning Area 7A, 7C, 8 and Portions of 6 3-31 3.0.8 Planning Area 9A 3-35 3.0.9 Planning Area 32 3-39 3.1 Plateau Neighborhood Design Guidelines 3-43 3.1.1 Landscape Concept 4-43 3.1.2 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Facilities 3-47 3.1.3 Trail System 3-60 3.1.4 Project Monumentation and Private Entries 3-61 3.1.5 Streetscape Treatments 3-81 3.1.6 Fuel Modification of Open Space 3-115 3.1.7 Landscape Material Guidelines 3-123 3.1.8 Street Outdoor Lighting and Signage 3-132 3.1.9 Architectural Design Guidelines 3-144 SECTION 4 4.0 Valley Neighborhood Planning Area Descriptions And DevelopmentStandards . 4-1 4.0.1 Planning Area 9A, 9A, and 13.. 4-1 4.0.2 Planning Area 10 4-5 4.0.3 Planning Area 11 4-9 4.0.4 Planning Area 12 4-13 4.0.5 Planning Area 13 4-17 4.0.6 Planning Area 14 ........... .... 4-21 4.0.7 Planning Area 15 4-25 4.0.8 Planning Area 16A and 16B 4-29 4.0.9 Planning Area 17A and 17B 4-35 4.0.10 Planning Area 18A, 18B, and 1BC 4-41 4.0.11 Planning Area 19 4-49 4.0.12 Planning Area 20A and 20B 4-53 4.0.13 Planning Area 21 4-59 4.0.14 Planning Area 22 4-63 4.0.15 Planning Area 23A 4-67 4.0.16 Planning Area 238 4-71 4.0.17 Planning Area 24 4-75 4.0.18 Planning Area 25 and 26 . 4-79 4.0.19 Planning Area 27 .... ............................... .... 4-85 4.0.20 Planning Area 28 ..... 4-89 4.0.21 Planning Area 29 4-93 4.0.22 Planning Area 30 4-97 4.0.23 Planning Area 31Aand 31B 4-101 4.0.24 Planning Area 33A 4-107 4.0.25 Planning Area 33B 4-111 4.0 Valley Neighborhood Design Guidelines 4-115 4.0.1 Landscape Concept 4-115 4.0.2 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Facilities 4-116 4.0.3 School Facilities 4-125 4.0.4 Trail System 4-131 4.0.5 Project Monumentation . 4-153 4.0.6 Streetscape Treatments 4-163 4.0.7 Fuel Modification of Open Space 4-217 4.0.8 Landscape Material Guidelines . 4-233 4.0.9 Street Outdoor Lighting, Signage, and Interface 4-246 4.0.10 Architectural Design Guidelines 4-255 SECTION 5 5.0 Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance 5-1 5.0.1 Purpose And Intent 5-1 5.0.2 General Provisions 5-2 5.0.3 Residential Development Standards 5-3 5.0.4 Neighborhood Commercial (Planning Area 11) 5-11 5.0.5 Parks And Open Space (Planning Areas 1B, 5, 6, 7A, 7C, 8, 9A, 13, 23B, 25, 26, 27, And 30) 5-17 5.0.6 Public Institutional (Planning Area 32) 5-19 5.0.7 Parking Requirements 5-19 SECTION 6 6.0 Implementation 6-1 6.1 Implementation Measures 6-2 6.1.1 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 6-2 6.1.2 Circulation Master Plan 6-2 6.1.3 Drainage and Water Quality Master Plan 6-4 6.1.4 Water Master Plan 6-5 6.1.5 Sewer Master Plan 6-5 6.1.6 Grading Master Plan . 6-6 6.1.7 Phasing Master Plan . 6-8 6.1.8 Open Space and Recreation Master Plan 6-9 6.1.9 Landscape Master Plan 6-9 6.2 Timing And Responsibility For Improvements 6-10 LIST OF FIGURES Exprntive Summary Figure ES- 1: Regional Location Map ES-8 Figure ES- 2: Project Vicinity Map. ES-10 Figure ES- 3: Surrounding Land Use & Proposed Development. ES-13 Figure ES-4: General Plan Amendment ES-15 SECTION 1.0 Figure 1-1: Existing Zoning 1-24 Figure 1-2: Existing General Plan Land Use Designations . 1-25 Figure 1-3: General Plan Circulation Element Amendment 1-29 SECTION 2.0 Figure 2- 1: Proposed Land Use Plan 2-7 Figure 2- 2: Neighborhood Plan .... 2-11 Figure 2- 3: Plateau Conceptual Circulation Master Plan 2-47 Figure 2- 4: Valley Conceptual Circulation Master Plan 2-49 Figure 2- 5: Plateau Typical Street Section 2-57 Figure 2- 6: Plateau Typical Street Section 2-58 Figure 2- 7: Plateau Typical Street Section 2-59 Figure 2- 7A: Plateau Typical Street Section . 2-60 Figure 2- 8: Plateau Typical Street Section 2-61 Figure 2- 9: Plateau Typical Gated Entries .... .......... 2-62 Figure 2- 10: Valley Typical Street Sections 1 and 2 2-63 Figure 2- 11: Valley Typical Street Sections 3 and 4 2-64 Figure 2-12: Valley Typical Street Section 5 . 2-65 Figure 2- 13: Valley Typical Street Sections 6 and 7 2-66 Figure 2-14: Valley Typical Street Sections 8 and 9 . 2-67 Figure 2-14A: Valley Roundabout Schematic 2-69 Figure 2- 15: Proposed Circulation Improvements...... ............... 2-73 Figure 2- 16: Plateau Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation Plan.. 2-75 Figure 2- 17: Valley Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation Plan 2-77 Figure 2- 18: Plateau Proposed Sidewalk Plan. 2-79 Figure 2- 19: Valley Conceptual Sidewalk Master Plan 2-81 Figure 2- 20: Plateau Conceptual Drainage Master Plan 2-91 Figure 2- 21: Valley Conceptual Drainage & Water Quality Master Plan .... ............ 2-93 Figure 2- 22: Plateau Conceptual Water Master Plan ..... 2-97 Figure 2- 23: Valley Conceptual Water Master Plan 2-99 Figure 2- 24: Plateau Conceptual Sewer Master Plan . 2-103 Figure 2- 25: Valley Conceptual Sewer Master Plan 2-105 Figure 2- 26: Plateau Conceptual Grading Master Plan 2-111 Figure 2- 27: Valley Conceptual Grading Master Plan 2-113 Figure 2- 27A: Valley Grading Master Plan 2-115 Figure 2- 27B: Valley Grading Master Plan 2-116 Figure 2- 27C: Valley Grading Master Plan 2-117 Figure 2- 27D: Valley Grading Master Plan 2-118 Figure 2- 27E: Valley Grading Master Plan 2-119 Figure 2- 27F: Valley Grading Master Plan 2-120 Figure 2- 27G: Valley Grading Master Plan 2-121 Figure 2- 27H: Valley Grading Master Plan 2-122 Figure 2- 271: Valley Grading Master Plan ...................... .. 2-123 Figure 2- 27J: Valley Grading Master Plan . 2-124 Figure 2- 28: Conceptual Phasing Master Plan 2-131 Figure 2- 29: Plateau Conceptual Open Space & Recreation Master Plan . 2-139 Figure 2- 30: Valley Conceptual Recreation Master Plan 2-141 Figure 2- 31: Area Wide Open Space Concept Plan 2-143 Figure 2- 32: Plateau Conceptual Landscape Master Plan 2-149 Figure 2- 33: Valley Conceptual Landscape Master Plan 2-151 Figure 2- 33A: Valley Landscape Irrigation Master Plan 2-153 Figure 2- 34: Plateau Conceptual Walls & Fences Master Plan 2-159 Figure 2- 35: Plateau Project Walls & Privacy Fences 2-161 Figure 2- 36: Plateau View Fences 2-163 Figure 2- 37: Plateau Habitat Walls & Fences 2-165 Figure 2- 38: Valley Conceptual Walls & Fences Master Plan 2-167 Figure 2-39: Valley Habitat Fence 2-169 Figure 2- 40: Valley Project Wall 2-171 Figure 2-41: Valley Partial Project Wall/Partial Glass Fence 2-173 Figure 2- 42: Valley View Fence 2-175 Figure 2- 43: Valley View Fence 2-177 Figure 2- 44: Valley 3-Rail Lodgepole Fence 2-179 Figure 2- 45: Valley 2-Rail Lodgepole Fence 2-181 Figure 2- 46: Valley Privacy Fence 2-183 Figure 2- 47: Plateau Off -Site Improvements - Sewer & Water 2-191 Figure 2-48: Plateau Off -Site Improvement - Street & Drainage . 2-193 Figure 2-49: Valley Master Developer Improvement Areas 2-195 SECTION 3.0 Figure 3- 1: Planning Area 1A and 1B 3-5 Figure 3-2: Planning Area 2 3-11 Figure 3-3: Planning Area 3 3-17 Figure 3-4: Planning Area 4A and 4B 3-23 Figure 3-5: Planning Area 5 3-27 Figure 3-6: Planning Area 6 3-33 Figure 3-7: Planning Area 7A, 7B, 7C and Open Spaces . 3-37 Figure 3-8: Planning Area 9A 3-43 Figure 3-9: Planning Area 32 ........ ... 3-47 Figure 3-10: Plateau Landscape Master Plan 3-51 Figure 3-11: Neighborhood Park 3-55 Figure 3-12: Primary Center 3-59 Figure 3-13: Primary Club Clubhouse Elevation 3-61 Figure 3-14: Mini -Park . 3-63 Figure 3-15: Plateau Trail System Master Plan 3-69 Figure 3-16: Visual Buffer Areas 3-71 Figure 3-17: Plateau Nature Walk .......... .... 3-73 Figure 3-18: Primary Project Monumentation 3-75 Figure 3-19: Staffed Gated Primary Entry (Perspective) 3-77 Figure 3-20: Staffed Gated Primary Entry (PA 3 and 4A) . 3-79 Figure 3-21: Auto and Pedestrian Gated Entry 3-81 Figure 3-22: Card Key Gated Entry (PA 1A) 3-83 Figure 3-23: Card Key Gated Entry (4A and 4B) 3-85 Figure 3-24: Butterfield Stage Road (PA 9B and 13) 3-89 Figure 3-25: Butterfield Stage Road (PA 11 and 13) 3-91 Figure 3-26: Butterfield Stage Road (PA 12 and 13) 3-93 Figure 3-27: Butterfield Stage Road (PA 12 and 14) . 3-95 Figure 3-28: Butterfield Stage Road (PA 22) 3-97 Figure 3-29: Butterfield Stage Road (PA 27) 3-99 Figure 3-30: Butterfield Stage Road (PA 32) 3-101 Figure 3-31: Murrieta Hot Springs Road (PA 1A, 2, 3, and 4A) 3-105 Figure 3-32: Murrieta Hot Springs Road (PA 4A, 4B, and 8) 3-107 Figure 3-33: Murrieta Hot Springs Road (PA 6 and 9A) 3-109 Figure 3-34: Murrieta Hot Springs Road (PA 9B and 11) 3-111 Figure 3-35: Murrieta Hot Springs Road (PA 10 and 11) 3-113 Figure 3-36: Private Interior Street (Option 1) 3-117 Figure 3-37: Private Interior Street (Option 2) 3-119 Figure 3-38: Plateau Fuel Modification Zone Master Plan 3-123 Figure 3-39: Plateau Fuel Modification Zone Master Plan ...... 3-125 Figure 3-40: Plateau Fuel Modification Zone Master Plan 3-127 Figure 3-41: Street Lighting . 3-141 Figure 3-42: Street Signage 3-143 Figure 3-43: Paseo Entry Gate (Card Key Entry) 3-145 Figure 3-44: Paseo Entry Treatments 3-147 Figure 3-45: Cross Section G Open Space Plateau 3-149 Figure 3-46: American Farmhouse . 3-154 Figure 3-47: Inspirational Photos 3-155 Figure 3-48: California Ranch 3-156 Figure 3-49: Inspirational Photos 3-157 Figure 3-50: Classic Revival 3-158 Figure 3-51: Inspirational Photos 3-159 Figure 3-52: Colonial Figure 3-160 Figure 3-53: Inspirational Photos . ... ... .. .. .. ... .... 3-161 Figure 3-54: Contemporary Southwest 3-162 Figure 3-55: Inspirational Photos 3-163 Figure 3-56: Craftsman 3-164 Figure 3-57: Inspirational Photos 3-165 Figure 3-58: French Cottage 3-166 Figure 3-59: Inspirational Photos 3-167 Figure 3-60: East Coast Traditional .. ...... .............. 3-168 Figure 3-61: Inspirational Photos 3-169 Figure 3-62: Italiante . 3-170 Figure 3-63: Inspirational Photos 3-171 Figure 3-64: Mediterranean 3-172 Figure 3-65: Inspirational Photos 3-173 Figure 3-66: Mission 3-174 Figure 3-67: Inspirational Photos ....................................... 3-175 Figure 3-68: Monterey 3-176 Figure 3-69: Inspirational Photos 3-177 Figure 3-70: Prairie Style 3-178 Figure 3-71: Inspirational Photos 3-179 Figure 3-72: Spanish Revival 3-180 Figure 3-73: Inspirational Photos 3-181 Figure 3-74: Recessed Garage 3-182 Figure 3-75: Deep Recessed Garages. 3-183 Figure 3-76: Third Car - Side Located 3-184 Figure 3-77: Third Car - Tandem 3-185 Figure 3-78: Side Garage Entry 3-186 Figure 3-79: Single Width Driveways 3-187 Figure 3-80: Porte Cochere 3-188 Figure 3-81: Varied Roof Shapes 3-197 Figure 3-82: Covered Entry Porch ..................... 3-198 Figure 3-83: Courtyard Entries 3-199 Figure 3-84: Garage Door Detailing 3-200 Figure 3-85: Roof Pitches 3-203 Figure 3-86: Solar Panels 3-204 Figure 3-87: Sample Mail Kiosk 3-206 Figure 3-88: Air Conditioning Pads ........ .............. ................... 3-207 Figure 3-89: Smaller Lots (hardscape & landscape concept) . 3-209 Figure 3-90: LM, Ml, M2 (hardscape &landscape concept) 3-210 Figure 3-91: LM, Ml, M2 (hardscape concept) 3-211 Figure 3-92: LM, Mt, M2 (hardscape concept) 3-212 Figure 3-93: M2 - Tandem Garage 3-213 Figure 3-94: M2 - Rear Load Garage 3-214 SECTION 4.0 Figure 4-1: Planning Area 9B 4-5 Figure 4-2: Planning Area 10 4-13 Figure 4-3: Planning Area 11 4-19 Figure 4-4: Planning Area 12 4-27 Figure 4-5: Planning Area 13 4-33 Figure 4-6: Planning Area 14 4-41 Figure 4-7: Planning Area 15 4-49 Figure 4-8: Planning Area 16A 4-57 Figure 4-9: Planning Area 16B 4-59 Figure 4-10: Planning Area 17A 4-67 Figure 4-11: Planning Area 17B 4-69 Figure 4-12: Planning Area 18A 4-77 Figure 4-13: Planning Area 18B 4-79 Figure 4-14: Planning Area 18C 4-81 Figure 4-15: Planning Area 19 4-89 Figure 4-16: Planning Area 20A 4-97 Figure 4-17: Planning Area 20B 4-99 Figure 4-18: Planning Area 21 4-107 Figure 4-19: Planning Area 22 4-115 Figure 4-20: Planning Area 23A 4-123 Figure 4-21: Planning Area 23B 4-127 Figure 4-22: Planning Area 24 4-133 Figure 4-23: Planning Area 25 4-139 Figure 4-24: Planning Area 26 4-141 Figure 4-25: Planning Area 27 4-149 Figure 4-26: Planning Area 28 4-155 Figure 4-27: Planning Area 29 4-161 Figure 4-28: Planning Area 30 4-167 Figure 4-29: Planning Area 31A 4-175 Figure 4-30: Planning Area 31B 4-177 Figure 4-31: Planning Area 33A 4-183 Figure 4-32: Planning Area 33B 4-187 Figure 4-33: Community Sports Park 4-195 Figure 4-34: Recreation Center 4-203 Figure 4-35: Age Targeted Recreation Center 4-205 Figure 4-36: Middle School Site 4-209 Figure 4-37: Elementary School Facility 4-211 Figure 4-38: Trail Type A 4-219 Figure 4-39: Trail Type B 4-221 Figure 4-40: Trail Type C 4-223 Figure 4-41: Trail Type D 4-225 Figure 4-42: Figure 4-43: Figure 4-44: Figure 4-45: Figure 4-46: Figure 4-47: Figure 4-48: Figure 4-49: Figure 4-50: Figure 4-51: Figure 4-52: Trail Type E Trail Type F Trail Type G Trail Type H Trail Type I Trail Type Pedestrian Bride Typical Gated Entry Option Project Monumentation Round -About Monumentation Nicolas Road Cross Section Figure 4-52A Figure 4-53: Figure 4-54: Figure 4-55: Figure 4-56: Figure 4-57: Figure 4-58: Figure 4-59: Figure 4-60: Figure 4-61: Figure 4-62: Figure 4-63: Figure 4-64: Figure 4-65: Figure 4-66: Figure 4-67: Figure 4-68: Figure 4-69: Figure 4-70: Figure 4-71: Figure 4-72: Figure 4-73: Figure 4-74: Figure 4-75: Figure 4-76: Figure 4-77: Figure 4-78: Figure 4-79: Figure 4-80: Figure 4-81: Figure 4-82: Figure 4-83: : Nicolas Road (Calle Girasol to W. Project Boundary) Cross Section Nicolas Road Oblique Nicolas Road Perspective Loop Road Cross Section Loop Road Oblique Loop Road Perspective Loop Road Round -About Oblique Loop Road Round -About Perspective Roripaugh Valley Road Cross Section Roripaugh Valley Road Oblique Roripaugh Valley Road Perspective Fiesta Ranch Road Cross Section Fiesta Ranch Road Oblique Fiesta Ranch Road Perspective Local Street - Typical Condition Local Street Oblique Option 1 Local Street Perspective Option 1 Local Street Oblique Option 2 Local Street Perspective Option 2 Local Street Oblique Option 3 Local Street Perspective Option 3 Valley Conceptual Fuel Modification Section Location Map Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section A and B Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section C and D Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section E and F Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section G and H Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section I and J Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section K and L Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section M and N Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section 0 and P Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section Q and R Valley Fuel Modification Master Plan - Section S 4-227 4-229 4-231 4-233 4-235 4-237 4-249 2-251 4-253 4-255 4-261 4-263 4-265 4-267 4-273 4-275 4-277 4-279 4-281 4-287 4-289 4-291 4-297 4-299 4-301 4-307 4-309 4-311 4-313 4-315 4-317 4-319 4-327 4-329 4-330 4-331 4-332 4-333 4-334 4-335 4-336 4-337 4-338 Figure 4-84: Cross Section (A) Medium Density Interface ......... ........... 4-362 Figure 4-85: Cross Section (B) Medium Density Interface 4-363 Figure 4-86: Cross Section (C) Medium Density Interface 4-364 Figure 4-87: Cross Section (D) PA 12 &14 Residential Interface 4-365 Figure 4-88: Cross Section (F) South Project Boundary Interface.. 4-367 Figure 4-89: Cross Section (H) Low Residential Density Interface 4-368 Figure 4-90: American Farmhouse 4-373 Figure 4-91: California Ranch 4-374 Figure 4-92: Classic Revival ........ 4-375 Figure 4-93: Colonial 4-376 Figure 4-94: Contemporary Southwest 4-378 Figure 4-95: Craftsman 4-379 Figure 4-96: East Coast Traditional 4-380 Figure 4-97: French Cottage 4-381 Figure 4-98: Italiante 4-383 Figure 4-99: Mediterranean ..... ......... .... 4-384 Figure 4-100: Mission 4-385 Figure 4-101: Monterey 4-386 Figure 4-102: Prairie Style 4-387 Figure 4-103: Spanish Revival 4-388 Figure 4-104: Recessed Garage 4-389 Figure 4-105: Deep Recessed Garages 4-390 Figure 4-106: Third Car - Side Located ................... .................. 4-391 Figure 4-107: Porte Cochere 4-392 Figure 4-108: Single Width Driveways . 4-393 Figure 4-109: Varied Roof Shapes 4-402 Figure 4-110: Covered Entry Porch 4-403 Figure 4-111: Courtyard Entries 4-404 Figure 4-112: Garage Door Detailing 4-405 Figure 4-113: Roof Pitches 4-408 Figure 4-114: Solar Panels .... ... 4-409 Figure 4-115: Sample Mail Kiosk 4-411 Figure 4-116: Air Conditioning Pads 4-412 Figure 4-117: MF Zone PAs 28 & 29 Cluser Option (10 DU Hammerhead) 4-415 Figure 4-118: MF Zone PAs 28 & 29 Cluser Option (10 DU Cul-de-Sac) 4-416 Figure 4-119: MF Zone PAs 28 & 29 Cluser Option (8 DU Thru-Street) 4-417 Figure 4-120: MF Zone PAs 28 & 29 Cluser Option (10 DU Alley Access Scheme) 4-418 Figure 4-121: MF Zone PAs 28 & 29 Cluser Option (10 DU Rear Loaded Garages) 4-419 Figure 4-122: M2 -Tandem Garage 4-420 Figure 4-123: M2 - Rear Load Garage 4-421 Figure 4-124: Smaller Lots - Hardscape & Landscape Concept 4-422 Figure 4-125: LM, Ml, M2 - Hardscape & Landscape Concept 4-423 Figure 4-126: LM, M1, M2 - Hardscape Concept 4-424 Figure 4-127: LM, M1, M2 - Hardscape Concept 4-425 Figure 4-128: American Farmhouse 4-428 Figure 4-129: California Ranch 4-429 Figure 4-130: Classic Revival 4-430 Figure 4-131: Colonial 4-431 Figure 4-132: Contemporary Southwest 4-432 Figure 4-133: Craftsman. 4-433 Figure 4-134: East Coast Traditional 4-434 Figure 4-135: French Cottage .. 4-435 Figure 4-136: Italiante 4-436 Figure 4-137: Mediterranean . 4-437 Figure 4-138: Mission 4-438 Figure 4-139: Monterey 4-439 Figure 4-140: Prairie 4-440 Figure 4-141: Spanish Revival 4-441 Figure 4-142: Neighborhood Commercial ... ...... 4-451 SECTION 5 No figures listed in Section 5. SECTION 6 Figure 6-1: Landscape Maintenance Responsibility Master Plan 6-25 LIST OF TABLES Executive Summary Table ES-1: Proposed Land Uses ES-6 SECTION 1 Table 1-1: Procedural Approval Authority 1-22 SECTION 2 Table 2-1: Residential Land Uses by Land Use 2-14 Table 2-2: Proposed Land Uses by Planning Areas (PA) 2-21 SECTION 3 No tables listed in Section 3. SECTION 4 No tables listed in Section 4. SECTION 5 Table 5-1: Schedule of Permitted Uses -Residential Districts 5-6 Table 5-2: Development Standards -Residential Districts 5-8 Table 5-2.1: Accessory Structure Setbacks 5-10 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (UNDERLINE/STRIKEOUT) CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTPS://TEM EC U LACA.GO V/C EQA