HomeMy WebLinkAbout091702 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 - 7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 11 :00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 11 :00 P.M.
.
6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of. the City Council pursuant to Governrnent Code
Sections:
1. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to two matters of existing litigation
involving the City. The following case will be discussed: 1) City of Temecula
v. Riverside County (Tucalotta Hills Associates) and 2) City of Temecula v.
Riverside County (Domenigoni-Barton).
2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(b)(1) with respect to one matter of potential litigation.
With respect to such matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has
been reached where there is .asignificant exposure to litigation involving the
City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide
whether to initiate litigation.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the Cityalld;various parties
may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2002-04
Resolution: No. 2002-76
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Ron Roberts
Prelude Music:
Hayley Lieberg
Invocation:
Rabbi Yitzchock Hauvurim of Chabad of Temecula Valley
Flag Salute:
Councilman Pratt
ROLL CALL:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
R:\AgendaI091702
PRESENT A TIONS/PROCLAMA TlONS
Kids Dav Americallnternational Proclamation
Santa Marqarita Watershed Clean-Up Dav Proclamation
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request t~
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of July 23, 2002;
2.2 Approve the minutes of July 30, 2002.
R:\AgendaI091702
2
3 Resolution Approvinq List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 Citv Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 2002.
5 Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2002;
5.2 Approve a budget transfer of $55,400 to City Attorney Department from CIP Admin
Department;
5.3 Approve a budget transfer of $7,200 to City Council Department from CIP Admin
Department;
5.4 Approve an estimated revenue and appropriation of $129,600 to the AB3229-COPS
Fund;
5.5 Approve a reduction of the estimated revenues for Grants (COPS) and an increase
in operating transfers into the General Fund in the amount of $129,600.
6 Holiday Schedule for City Council Meetinqs
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Direct the City Clerk to reschedule the City Council meeting of December 24, 2002,
to December 17, 2002 and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing
requirements of the Government Code.
7 Purchase of Hiqh-Speed Emerqency Notification System
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Authorize the purchase of a City-wide Emergency Notification System from Plant
Equipment for $42,791.25.
R:\AgendaI091702
3
8 Purchase of one Fire Department Rescue Squad Vehicle
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve the purchase of the Rescue Squad Vehicle Apparatus from KME in the
amount of $108,906.16.
9 Substitute Aqreements and Bonds for various Tracts within the Crowne Hill Subdivision
(located east of Butterfield Staqe Road, south of Pauba Road, and north of De Portola
Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143;
9.2 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143-1; .
9.3 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision
Monument Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-1;
9.4 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision
Monument Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-5;
9.5 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143-6;
9.6 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision
Monument Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-6;
9.7 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143-8;
9.8 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision
Monument Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-8;
9.9 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143-10;
9.10 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision
Monument Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-10;
9.11 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143-11;
9.12 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision
Monument Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-11;
R:\AgendaI091702
4
9.13 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143-F;
9.14 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision
Monument Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-F;
9.15 Acknowledge that original bonds collected by the original subdivider, Crowne
Meadows, LP, will be released upon acceptance of substitute bonds by separate
administrative action;
9.16 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
10 Completion and Acceptance of Construction Contract for the FY2001-2002 Slurry Seal
Proqram - Proiect No. PW02-05
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Accept the FY2001-2002 Slurry Seal Program Project - Project No. PW02-05 - as
complete;
10.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a 12-month
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
10.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
11 Tract Map No. 29639-1 (located south of Date Street and west of Marqarita Road within
the Harveston Specific Plan)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve Tract Map No. 29639-1 in conformance with the conditions of approval;
11.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement;
11.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as
security for the agreement.
12 Tract Map Nos. 29928, 29928-1, 29928-2, and 29928-3 (located within the Harveston
Specific Plan)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve Tract Map Nos. 29928, 29928-1, 29928-2, and 29928-3 in conformance
with the conditions of approval;
12.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreements and accept the Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for the agreement;
12.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreements and accept the Monument Bonds
as security for the agreement.
R:\AgendaI091702
5
13 Tract Map Nos. 29929 and 29929-1 (located within the Harveston Specific Plan)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve Tract Map Nos. 29929 and 29929-1 in conformance with the conditions of
approval;
13.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreements and accept the Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for the agreement;
13.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreements and accept the Monument Bonds
as security for the agreement.
14 Tract Map No. 30088 (located north of Township Road, south of Harveston School Road.
west of Marqarita Road, and east of Harveston Drive within the Harveston Specific Plan)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve Tract Map No. 30088 in conformance with the conditions of approval;
14.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement;
14.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as
security for the agreement.
********************
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
AND
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
********************
R:\AgendaI091702
6
. ..:..... . .......................0..,..... ..... '. .'.'..... cHn;:,:,;;:!k:j.1:n:>EF:!;;E'.;[{:..~ .Y.' '.. ... ... [V~.....:;,:;~:",{{~'.f~j, >'\.~r~ :~C" \ ;'~;~"';;,~
********7,.******~*~.*:~~t~t~.jrTh~t*:t,~rr.rrmf~t~!:1:rr,~,~;rrM;~.rr'~r:~:n.rr1~f!trrrr:n:t'.rr:.,:n'~t:~!fl~'8!~.1~:~r*:f*t7:h~7:~'r~m~~rr.~llirm{~mlm2*'1~t~*;~,t
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING" ~~
**********************************************************~******************************************************
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2002-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2002-08
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record,
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1,1 Approve the minutes of August 27, 2002.
2 Tract Map No, 23209 - Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service Level D Rates
and Charqes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:\AgendaI091702
7
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH
RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND
SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT MAP
NO. 23209 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 AND
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
3 Acceptance of Landscape Bonds and Aqreements for Tract Map No. 29639 -
Harveston, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Harveston, LLC, to improve the
perimeter slopes and parkways along Date and Margarita Roads within Tract.
Map No. 29639;
3.2 Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Harveston, LLC, to improve the
Landscaped medians on Margarita, Date, and Lakeview Roads within Tract Map
No, 29639;
3.3 Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Harveston, LLC, to improve the
perimeter slopes along the interior Loop Road within Tract Map No. 29639.
4 Award of Construction Contract - Proiect No. PW02-01CSD - Children's Museum
Buildinq Shell Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Award a construction contract to R.E. Fleming Construction, Inc. of Hesperia,
California, for the Children's Museum Building Shell Improvements - Project No,
PW02-01 CSD - in the amount of $347,881.00 and authorize the President to
execute the contract;
4,2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
Contingency amount of $52,182.15 which is equal to 15% of the contract
amount.
5 Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2002.
R:\AgendaI091702
8
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\AgendaI091702
9
';'j<;;; ".!- "',"""""1(;>";;"'"
*************,*,*~*:~t:*~,:*'~m"m:~~~~'~n~'~~m~~~,!,t,f~,~f::~0~t[~~~tmr1~~~mmmm' ",'
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING' .
'T:''"''
;;:<":"':: ;;"'; "; :' ,:; '" ',: " : :;
***************************************************~***************************************.*********************
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2002-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2002-09
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1,1 Approve the minutes of August 27, 2002.
2 Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30. 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended
June 30, 2002;
2.2 .Increase the Debt Service bond proceeds revenue estimate by $23,586,600;
2.3 Increase the Debt Service Fund appropriation for refunding bonds by
$12,044,100;
2.4 Increase the Debt Service Fund appropriation for cost of issuance by $997,300.
R:\AgendaI091702
10
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, September 24, 2002, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\AgendaI091702
11
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. TPFA 2002-02
Resolution: No. TPFA 2002-07
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Temecula
Public Financing Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state vour name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 13, 2002.
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
COUNCIL/AUTHORITY BUSINESS
2 Initial Actions relatinQ to formation of Community Facilities District for Crown Hill
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
R:\AgendaI091702
12
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT
2.2 That the Authority adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO
THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH
RESPECT THERETO
RECESS CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
BOARD MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
R:\AgendaI091702
13
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public Hearing or
may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s)
at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or
in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
15 Villaqes of Temecula General Plan Amendment (PAOO-0138), Chanqe of Zone (PAOO-
0139), Development Plan (PAOO-0140), Tentative Parcel Map (PAOO-0152)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
BASED ON THE INITIAL STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0138, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REALIGN
THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (M) LAND-USE DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES
OF A 23-ACRE SITE, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD, AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS.
944-290-012, -013, AND -014, BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS
AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT
R:\AgendaI091702
14
15.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 02-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0139, A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PROFESSIONAL
OFFICE (PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDOI AND ADOPTING
THE STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE
ACCOMPANYING PDO DOCUMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED
SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC
ROAD, AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION
OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 944-290-012, -013, AND -014
15.4 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0140, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION OF A 160-UNIT
APARTMENT COMPLEX AND EIGHT RETAIL/OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 68,700 SQUARE FEET, GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST
OF COSMIC ROAD, AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 944-290-012, -013, AND -014
15.5 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0152 - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 29140
SUBDIVIDING THE SITE FROM THREE LOTS INTO EIGHT
LOTS, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD, AND EAST OF
THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS.
944-290-012, -013, AND -014
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\AgendaI091702
15
PROCLAMA TIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
.;3 .....
Cil 5 'tl .. cd
~~ .~
1l t I-< t}'-'-
'tl .2 '" 0 0
~ 'tl ~:.a 'tl c:l .s.o>>
v 8 9'''' cd
~ :0 () .~ U'tl
~ t: v p.. ~51--
~ v rn $
~ g 'tl5 i
'tl b ..c:..........
cd :0 ~ ~"O v 0
..!:l t: ..i:I lea .'"
..b ~ is:;a v .....rJS:s
s ,c ~
'S o I-< ~ r:.;Q)'tl
..... ."" !E.si
I rn 5 () ~~~
~ . rn S
B 1l] rn
.....
..!:l .... ~ ~ ~ Q) .
;:l rn () {J
] () {J ..... "'.oC'!
5 ..bel r- () 0
~ ..i:I 0 r-
5 t:...... Cil: ..b 'a (I)'tl 0
.s b rn ;:l.o 5~ .... = ~~.s
v ~ v 8~ U
= is @ .0 Q 'tl '"
V ~~g
,c p.. v ~ .m ~ ~ .;3 ;::
rn
~Z .... I-< rn cd 5~ eo: ..c:s.....
~ .2 v .....
~O 'tl ..i:I 0 = !S g~ ~
0 5 'tl rn ~u .~ 0 ~ l-o
e~ p.. I ~
rn ~ E t: () ()
~~ ~ () v !:l t: =
~< t: E p....!:l 'tl 0 5 ~
I-< 8 ~~ ~.S
~~ ;:l v '" C) -
0 ~ ~ .~ v 0 8 eo:
0< rn 5 () () ..b() ~
.... 0
() ;:::l 0 ~ ~ C) ...
.~~ t: ~ Cil 'tl 0..... 5 l-o
~ p....!:l rn1J ~
~u 'tl rn ~ Cil{J ~
...... 0 :.a I-< . V .....
.... v t: ~'tl
u~ rn .~ () v 0
() cd ~ ..9 I-< ~
~~ ..... "0 ~ 1l ~ ~
0 rn :.a ..i:I
.... ..... I-<..b v
..= 'cD t: 0 1:: ~ ,c Q
.S () v v
~ ~ rn 0 o . p.. .... 5
v .... p..v o () fI.l
,c V 0 g~ I-< 0 "0
= :.a ~ 0 p..rn ~ ~
c:5 ......
~ () 'tl0
1-<. ~ 0 'tl .~ 8 \) v ...
'tl ;:l 0 ~5 ,c ...
~ 0 Cil c-i ;g~ & rn
..... ..... ..8<"2 cd
0 ..... rn :.a v t:C'!
.;3 t: 0
Cil ..b ~ ~ 1l \) () s &8
~ v .S "2
v v..... ......C'!
..c: rn 0 v .;3 S "2~ . ~
5 v .~ "\ij ..... ~~
.;3 t: 'tl .;3 ~ ~ >
I v B .~ ,g ..... cd
~~ '" ~~
I ~] . ~ ~ .s
II i () ~JS
~ ~ .g ~"O
.~ ~, ~~
~ . ~
~~
~ 5 B ~ Ii!:;-
() O'tl C'I
-a~ ;S 5
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
JULY 23, 2002
After the Closed Session that convened at 5:30 P.M., the City Council convened in Open
Session at 7:00 P.M., on Tuesday, July 23, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula
City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
Absent:
Council member:
None
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Matthew Fagan.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor David Shirley of Church on the Rock.
ALLEGIANCE
The flag ceremony was presented by Boy Scout Troop No. 384.
PRESENT A TIONS/PROCLAMA TIONS
National Kids Day Proclamation
Ms. Michelle Arerrano, Director of the Boys and Girls Club, and Mr. Chuck Washington, Vice
Chairman of the Board for the Boys and Girls Club, were in attendance to accept the
proclamation from Mayor Roberts.
Paramedic Assessment Squad Presentation
Fire Chief Windsor introduced the newly hired fire personnel, as follows: Fire
Captain/Paramedic Greg Adams, Fire Fighters IllParamedics Dean Fehler, Ty Davis, Curtis
Tate, and Dave Strickler, and Fire Apparatus Engineer/Paramedic Gad Amith; thanked the City
Council for its continue support, and welcomed the public to view the new Paramedic
Assessment Squad.
Special Achievement Award for attaininq Eaqle Scout rank - Aaron Shaw
Mayor Roberts presented the Special Achievement Award to Aaron Shaw who, in turn, briefly
provided an overview of. his Eagle Scout project.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Commenting on traffic management and enforcement concerns as it relates to the
Winchester/Jefferson Roads intersection, Mr. Michael Angel, P.O. Box 893460, advised that the
yellow light is too short and, therefore, creates a clearing problem; he suggested that the green light
for on-coming traffic be delayed.
R:\Minutes\072302
Mayor Roberts requested that City Manager Nelson follow-up on the matter.
B. Ms. Anne Cameron, representing Gateway Computers, apprised the City Council and the
public of an upcoming community service event to provide free photo identification of children.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. In light of the recent abduction, Councilman Naggar advised that the City Council has
taken proactive measures to support AB 415 (Amber Alert Bill); suggested that the City Council
consider the adoption of a resolution of support of AB 415; noted that the City has received a
$20,000 grant toward a Reverse 911 System; provided information with regard to the Megan
Law information that will be available through the City's Website; stated that more in depth
information will be available through the County's database at the Old Town Police Store Front
location; noted that the Citizens' Action Patrol will be expanded; and advised that he will be
contacting the School Board to determine its process in educating families with regard to this
matter.
B. Addressing the issue of the City generating/distributing its own electricity, Councilman
Pratt relayed his support of this concept.
Mr. Pratt commended the Musicians' Workshop on its performance of South Pacific;
advised that he has been appointed to the Land Use Committee and commented on his efforts
to protect the French Valley Airport; and requested that the City Council agendize the 90-day
Emergency Traffic Plan for the meeting of August 13, 2002.
C. Advising that he had attended the July 18, 2002, Metrolink Rail Station Groundbreaking
Ceremony, Mayor Roberts noted that this facility will function as the main Corona station,
accommodating approximately 625 parking spaces and two 680' long concrete passenger
loading/unloading platforms and noting the project should be completed by October 25, 2002.
Mr. Roberts as well advised that next year the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) Commuter Bus
System will go into affect, providing direct access to the MetrolinK by way of the freeway.
Commenting on the fatal accident on the south side of Winchester Road (County area),
Mayor Roberts advised that 30% of the intersection construction would be the responsibility of
the City and the remaining percentage would be the County's responsibility and commented on
the County's difficulty in finding funding sources to construct the intersection with signals.
D Commending staff on its efforts associated with the purchase of the second paramedic
squad, Mayor Pro Tem Stone advised that the City has its own independent paramedic service
which competes with the County provider, advising that the paramedics are trained on needle
tracheotomy and that both City squads are equipped with Fire GIS systems.
E. Reiterating the City's continued efforts to ensure that infrastructure be developed prior to
County development, Councilman Comerchero echoed Mayor Roberts' comment with regard to
the Winchester Road (County area) intersection.
In addition to Councilman Naggar's comments with regard to the City's proactive
measures with regard to informing the public of Megan's Law, Councilman Comerchero
encouraged the public to become involved with the Neighborhood Watch Program through the
Police Department.
In closing, Mr, Comerchero advised that Mayor Roberts and he had been appointed, by
Congressman Issa, to the Transportation Advisory Committee.
R:IMinutes1072302
2
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda,
2 Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of June 11, 2002.
3 Resolution Approvinq List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which
provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds.
5 Consideration of Cost-Sharinq Aqreement with Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC)
for ConsultinQ Services
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve a Cost-Sharing Agreement with Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC)
for Consulting Services in a matter of the Application of the San Diego Gas &
Electric Company for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the
Valley-Rainbow 500 KV Interconnect Project, in an amount not-to-exceed $25,000.
6 Sister City Monument Dedication In Honor of September 11
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the Temecula Duck Pond as the permanent installation location of our
Sister City monument "Singing In The Rain" to commemorate the tragedies of
September 11, 2001.
R:\MinutesI072302
3
7 Parcel Map No. 30178. located on the east side of Orsmby Road and north of Santiaqo
Road
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve Parcel Map 30178 in conformance with the conditions of approval;
7.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
7.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for
the agreements.
8 Approval of Cooperative Aqreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Aqency for
Construction and Fundinq of the Mercantile Buildinq Seismic Retrofit (Community
Theater) - Proiect PW01-20
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve an Agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of
Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for construction
and funding of the Mercantile Building Seismic Retrofit (Community Theatre) -
Project No. PW01-20;
8.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially
the form attached to the Agenda Report.
9 Annual Professional Service Aqreements for Real Estate Appraisal Services for various
Capital Improvement Proiects for FY 2002-2003
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve an agreement with Robert Shea Perdue Real Estate Appraisal in an
amount not to exceed $30,000 to provide as needed real estate appraisal services;
9.2 Approve an agreement with Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants
in an amount not to exceed $30,000 to provide as needed real estate appraisal
services:
9.3 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements.
10 Annual Professional Service Aqreements for Geotechnical and Material Testinq Services for
various Capital Improvement Proiects for FY 2002-2003
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve an agreement with EnGEN Public Works Services, LLC in an amount not
to exceed $60,000 to provide as needed geotechnical and materials testing
services;
10,2 Approve an agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc, in an amount not to exceed $60,000 to
provide as needed geotechnical and materials testing services;
R:IMinutesI072302
4
10.3 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements.
11 Annual Professional Service Aqreements for Enqineerinq and Construction Survey Services
for various Capital Improvement Proiects for FY 2002-2003
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve the annual agreement with Kevin Cozad & Associates, Inc. in an amount
not to exceed $60,000 to provide as needed engineering and construction survey
services;
11.2 Approve the annual agreement with Project Design Consultants in an amount not to
exceed $60,000 to provide as needed engineering and construction survey services;
11.3 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements.
12 Amendment NO.5 to Professional Services Aqreement - DMJM+HARRIS Pechanqa
Parkway (formerly known as Pala Road) Improvements - Phase II. Proiect No. PW99-11
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve Amendment NO.5 to the Professional Services Agreement with
DMJM+HARRIS in the amount of $20,103.75 to provide additional project
management and field surveying services, and authorize the Mayor to execute the
amendment;
12.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders above the original 10%
contingency approved by City Council on November 16, 1999 by an additional 5%
(or $28,980.00)
13 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for
Citywide asphalt Concrete Repairs for FY2002-2003, Proiect No. PW02-04
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Asphalt Concrete Repairs
for FY2002-2003, Project No. PW02-04.
14 Resolution of support for the passaqe of Measure A on the November. 2002 ballot
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE PASSAGE OF MEASURE A
ON THE NOVEMBER, 2002 BALLOT
R:\MinutesI072302
5
15 Morqan Hill Proiect Mitiqation Aqreement. Approval of Joint Community Facilities Aqreement
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT
AMONG EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AND CITY
OF TEMECULA AND MCMILLIN MORGAN HILL, LLC
16 Second Readinq of Ordinance No. 02-03
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 02-03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY
COUNCIL CITY OF TEMECULA
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 16. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone who abstained with regard to Item Nos 7 and 8 and Mayor
Roberts who abstained with regard to Item NO.2
At 7:39 PM., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency and after a short recess, the City Council Meeting resumed
will regular business at 8:19 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING
17 Remove a Condition of Approval on Amendment NO.7 of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan
(Planninq Application No. 02-0299)
Recommendation:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REMOVING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR
AMENDMENT' NO. 7 OF THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC
PLAN, ALSO KNOWN AS PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-
0285 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0299)
R:IMinutes1072302
6
Planning Director Ubnoske reviewed the staff (of record), noting that the existing interim detention
basin will remain and that staff recommends removal of Condition NO.7 (the Butterfield Stage
Interceptor ultimate improvements shall be built, or the City Council, following a public hearing,
determines that significant improvements have occurred in the negotiations for a reasonable
compromise, at which time, the Council has authority to issue building permits for Parcel Map No,
29431, Parcel 6 and 7 (Planning Areas 6A and 6B), consisting of 508 multi-family units. The City
shall process the request for a public hearing, if needed, as a "no fee" application. [Amended by
the City Council, November 9,1999, and modified by the City Council November 16,1999].)
At this time, Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing.
Having reviewed the staff report, Mr. Sam Alhadeff, 43460 Ridge Park Drive, #270, Temecula,
relayed his concurrence with staff's recommendation, noting the following:
. That there have been two years of negotiations;
. That the last definitive study by the Transportation Department of the County of Riverside
(copies provided - dated January 28, 2002) concluded the Coronas' desire to have the
Interceptor Channel constructed in such a fashion to protect their entire 160 acres even
including property outside of the City of Temecula and Assessment District;
. That the necessary funds to complete the improvements are not available;
. That there would not be a nexus to the Coronas' request.
In response to City Council comments, Mr. Alhadeff responded as follows:
. That it would be the position of the County Flood Control District, the County of Riverside,
the Transportation Department, and City staff that the interim detention basin (as per
Condition No. 40) is working and protecting the property;
. That Condition No. 40 may not be removed nor is Newland Communities seeking to remove
the condition; that the interim detention basin must remain in place until such time as the
Butterfield Interceptor Channel or some other adequate facility is built to convey offsite
storm flows to the Temecula Creek;
. That the lawsuit will to trial in late September;
. That Assessment District Nos. 159 and 161 surround the City of Temecula and that there
would be no dispute with the challenges of the management of these Districts;
. That the Coronas are not desirous of the originally designed improvements because it would
not protect their entire 160 acres only 19 acres;
. That the Coronas are unwilling to place their remaining 140 acres into a new assessment
district plus the 19 acres which are currently in the old assessment district;
. That the Coronas' property, at present, is not zoned for residential.
Mr. Dennis O'Neil, 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Irvine, representing Newland Communities,
advised that he was present to answer questions.
Ms. Michele Staples, 4 Park Plaza, 16th Floor, Irvine, representing the Corona Family, noted the
following:
. That Condition NO.7 placed a hold on 508 units until one of two circumstances have been
met: either that the Butterfield Stage Interceptor Channel ultimate improvements are built or
other significant improvements have occurred in the negotiations for a reasonable
compromise; that the purpose of the condition was to ensure that the project does not get
built out without construction of the Interceptor facility; that neither of the two circumstances
have been met;
R:IMinutes1072302
7
. That the Assessment District, after two years of negotiations, has been unable to reach a
resolution;
. That Condition No. 40 does not mitigate flooding to the Corona Ranch because water runs
downhill; that the detention basin is downhill from the Corona property; that new filling of the
former drainage area serves as a damn and, thereby, backing water up onto the Corona
property and, therefore, it remains in a Flood Control Hazard condition which includes
preexisting commercial buildings at the corner of Butterfield Stage Road and Highway 79;
. That the recommended action would be retaliation against the Coronas for exercising their
First Amendment rights to access the courts and enforce the condition of approval and
mitigation measures on the Newland project;
. That the Coronas filed litigation in February 2002 and that, thereafter, Newland
Communities submitted the application for removal of Condition No.7;
. That the staff report misrepresents the Coronas position; that the Coronas are not desirous
for flood protection for their entire property at Newland's expense; that the Coronas' position
is if Newland Communities would like a facility on the Corona property, then that facility
would need to be sited in a way that it does not interfere with existing agricultural business
or future plans to develop the property; that if that were unacceptable to Newland
Communities, Newland should place the facility on its own property;
. That CEQA, Government Code, City ordinances, and General Plan violations would occur if
the condition were deleted.
In response to the City Council, Ms. Staples noted the following:
. That the nexus to retain this condition would be between the permits withheld and potential
flooding of the property; that the parcel map is expressly linked to the condition of the
Specific Plan; that the condition of the Specific Plan requires the construction of the
Interceptor Channel prior to the development of the downstream properties;
. That many downstream properties have already been constructed and that the Interceptor
Channel is not in place; that the Specific Plan is out of compliance with the conditions of
approval;
. That the original condition on the Specific Plan and these parcel maps require Newland
Communities to construct the Interceptor facility;
. That versus denying project approvals, the City Council may choose to impose an additional
condition on the project, as a safety net, to attempt to ensure compliance with the condition;
. That Newland Communities has not agreed to a culvert facility on Newland property, which
would as well relieve flood conditions;
. That if a reasonable compromise were not achieved, the 508 units should not be
constructed until Newland constructs the Interceptor Channel;
. That with regard to litigation, although a Council subcommittee had been formed, no
meetings had been scheduled and that the filing deadline for litigation was approaching; that
Newland declined to enter into a Tolling agreement (extending time in which a lawsuit may
be filed);
· That the Coronas are not willing to dedicate their land, business, income to solve this
developer's problem; that the Coronas would prefer the construction of a culvert under
Butterfield Stage Road and an open channel on Newland's property; that the Coronas have
compromised to the construction of a channel on their property as long as it is sited in a way
that it does not impact current agriculture business or future development.
Mr. Steve Co~ona, 33320 Highway 79, Temecula, reviewed the amendments to the Paloma del Sol
Specific Plan along with a resolution to form a subcommittee (Comerchero and Stone) to address
the Butterfield Stage Interceptor Channel, noting that there had been no communication from the
subcommittee and, therefore, no other alternative was available but to file a lawsuit. Mr. Corona
proceeded with his opinion as to why not to remove the condition, noting the following:
R:IMinutes1072302
8
. That Newland Communities is not entitled to use Corona property to meet flood mitigations;
. That two alternatives, with the least amount of damages, have been proposed on the
Corona property -- a buried box culvert through the middle of the property which was
deemed as unfeasible by Flood Control and the eastern facility;
. That the facility be built on Newland property with no benefit to the Coronas;
. That there are insufficient monies in the District to build any facility regardless of location;
. That in 1999, Newland pledged $3.5 million in additional bonds to build the facility but such
funding has to date not been provided;
. That the proposed location of the facility was determined by the developer not the Coronas
nor AD 159;
. That none of the Coronas 165 acres is located within a 1 OO-year flood plane only the
portion that has been caused by the filling of the natural basin on Newland property.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone relayed his dismay with receiving lengthy packets the night of the meeting,
not giving the City Council ample review time. Mr. Stone as well objected to Ms. Staples' retaliation
comment, stating that the court will be deciding the outcome in two months and that a drainage
facility could have been built on the Corona property but that the Coronas choose to not have the
facility on the proposed site.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Mr. Alhadefffurther clarified the Tolling Agreement,
commented on Newland's objection to a waiver of rights, and noted the following:
. That Newland did not construct Butterfield Stage Road; that the District and the County
constructed this road;
. That the District/County have recommended that the channel be located on the Corona
property to protect the District but that the Coronas are not desirous of having that channel
placed on their property because they oppose the construction of an open channel because
it would interfere with the farming operation;
. That the developer has dedicated property for the detention basin - 33 acres.
For the City Councilmembers, Mr. Alhadeff noted the following:
. That 19.17 acres of the Corona property is located in the Assessment District and that the
proposed channel would be located within those acres;
. That the purpose of an Assessment District would be to provide regional infrastructure to
ensure development may proceed;
. That the Coronas have a deferral agreement with regard to their assessments and that all
associated properties have agreed to that agreement;
. That the County could have and may at any time exercise the power of eminent domain but
have been reluctant to do so because of lawsuit threats;
. That on January 28, 2002, the Assessment District and the County issued the Butterfield
Stage Road East Interceptor alternative analysis, summaries, and cost estimates; that the
analysis was unacceptable to the Coronas because of insufficient funding;
. That City Council action this evening will not preclude the court from taking action.
There being no additional public input, at 9:17 PM., Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing,
Reiterating that the City Council will not be judge and jury in terms of the proposed Interceptor
Channel, Councilman Comerchero noted that the City Council must address public safety; that the
33-acre detention basin provide flood control to the City; that safety concerns are not in question;
that the purpose of originally imposing Condition NO.7 was for the purpose of negotiation in order to
formulate a resolution; that it was always the City Council's intent to release this condition; and that
R:IMinutes1072302
9
the condition should be released at this time considering negotiations were attempted with the
involved parties.
Concurring with Councilman Comerchero's comments, Mayor Pro Tem Stone noted that, in his
opinion, there is no nexus; stated that the Assessment District language is vague; questioned why
the Coronas would place 19 acres of their property into the Assessment District when they are not
desirous of having a channel built on their property; and relayed his concurrence with the staff
recommendation,
Councilman Pratt noted that there would be a nexus in the form of a bond to ensure the channel
would be constructed.
Being of the opinion that the decision of location of the channel is that of the County and that the
County should make this decision, Councilman Naggar reiterated that the City Council's action will
not harm the Coronas considering the court will be considering the matter in two months and in light
of Condition No. 40 (interim detention basin); that flood control measures are in place; that filing the
lawsuit renders Condition NO.7 mute, noting that negotiations between the parties have stopped;
that there is not a nexus between withholding the 508 units and flood control; and that the City does
not have an obligation to preserve the future development of the Corona property beyond its current
agricultural use,
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved approve the staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilman Pratt who opposed,
COUNCIL BUSINESS
18 Consideration of Fundinq Mechanism for the Acquisition of Open Space
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Naggar.)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Discuss this matter and provide direction to Staff.
Councilman Naggar reviewed the staff report (of record), commenting on Mayor Pro Tem
Stone's earlier suggestion that once the $10 million threshold of reserves is met that monies be
set aside for the purchase of open space; noting that the City Council had made this
commitment in its recent budget approval; and suggesting that the City Council define open
space and as well identify possible funding sources.
Relaying his desire to acquire open space within the City as well as around the City perimeter
while available, Mayor Pro Tem Stone noted that the City's annual contributions to open space
will increase; suggested that a Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) survey be completed to
determine the City's position; and recommended that a subcommittee be formed to identify
potential open space properties.
Concurring with the formulation of a subcommittee, Councilman Comerchero offered to serve on
the committee and noted the following:
. That it would be critical to define open space as well as define the desired amount of
open space (developed parkland, natural habitat, trails, natural park-like setting, etc.);
. That future mitigation agreements be considered
R:\MinutesI072302
10
. That a Transient Occupancy Tax survey should be completed to consider the possibility
of raising the tax, noting that this tax is not paid by the City residents but by individuals
from outside the City/Region.
Commending Councilman Naggar for placing this item on the agenda, Mayor Roberts concurred
with the formulation of a subcommittee and relayed his support of the concept.
Having previously recommended this concept as a proposed ballot measure, Councilman Pratt
relayed his support and as well suggested the consideration of purchasing/annexing buffer
parcels such as the wineries to Vail Lake.
Reiterating previously made comments, Mayor Pro Tem Stone spoke in support of formulating a
subcommittee so that the committee work with staff to define open space as well as the amount
and type of open space, methods of purchase, and identification of site.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to form a subcommittee (comprised of Councilman
Naggar and Mayor Pro Tem Stone) in order to work with staff to formulate an overall policy with
regard to the acquisition of open space for City Council review. The motion was seconded by
Mayor Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. .
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
None.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Echoing his support of the formulation of an Open Space Subcommittee, City Manager Nelson
expressed his excitement with the project and noted that he would envision citizen support in
terms of raising funds for the purchase of open space.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
With regard to the real estate matter, City Attorney Thorson noted that City Council provided
direction to staff but that final action would be taken at a public hearing and that there were no
other items to report with respect to Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:51 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday July 30,2002, at 6:00
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, for the
purpose of a Joint City Council of Temecula/City Council of Murrieta Workshop.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W, Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:IMinutesI072302
11
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR
JOINT CITY OF TEMECULA/CITY OF MURRIETA WORKSHOP
JULY 30, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
The City Councils of Murrieta and Temecula convened in an adjourned regular joint workshop at
6:01 P.M., on Tuesday, July 30, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
City of Temecula
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, and Roberts
Absent:
Council member:
Stone
City of Murrieta
Present:
Council members:
Enochs, van Haaster, Youens, and Ostling
Absent:
Council member:
Seyarto
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Enochs.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1 Discussion of Riverside County Inteqrated Plan (RCIP) and Transportation Issues
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Discuss RCIP and Transportation issues.
It is noted that this item was considered after consideration of Item No.2; see page 4.
2 Discussion of SDG&E Vallev Rainbow Interconnect Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Discuss the SDG&E Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project
City Manager Mandoki, representing the City of Murrieta, provided a brief overview of the
manner in which the City of Murrieta has addressed the SDG&E Valley Rainbow Interconnect
Project, advising that on July 16, 2002 the Murrieta City Council approved an agreement with
R:IMinutes1073002
Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC) to fund up to $75,000 towards the cost of needed
additional experts.
Assistant to the City Manager Yates, representing the City of Temecula, presented an update
on the status of the project, relaying that the project had two phases, that the first phase was to
determine whether there was a need for the project, that if the Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) determined there was a need, hearings would continue and the project would enter the
second phase which would determine the location of the line; advised that the Administrative
Law Judge hearings concluded in May whereas the City of Temecula, SSRC, SDG&E and
others provided information, that closing briefs were due on August 5th, that closing arguments
were scheduled for August 20th, that the City of Temecula would be participating in these
phases as well, that the judge's decision (which was advisory to the PUC) was expected after
the closing arguments; noted that the PUC has scheduled tentative dates for the second phase
of the project (in the case it was determined that the second phase will be entered), that
October 21 5t was the tentative date scheduled for SDG&E to provide their Opening Brief, that
the cities have until November 18th to file their briefs; relayed that the City's current efforts were
focused on advocacy and public information and that the City of Temecula's website had
information regarding the project as well as a draft letter to the Governor (addressing concerns
regarding the project) which the public could access; and for Councilman Comerchero, advised
that if the project enters the second phase, staff would obtain additional information regarding
Congressman Issa's Bill (HR. 3476).
Ms. Barbara Wilder, representing Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC) provided a detailed
overview of the project's process, relaying the following:
. Noted her pleasure and thanks that the Cities of Murrieta and Temecula have joined
together in addressing this particular project;
Provided additional information regarding the project's course, relaying that Phase I of the
project concluded with the last day of evidentiary hearings on May 16th, that expert
witnesses provided by SSRC, the City of Temecula, and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Mission Indians appeared at the hearings and provided testimony which was compelling and
impressive;
. That if required to go to Phase II, additional aid for the expert witnesses' fees may be
needed at that time;
. That at this time the parties to the proceedings are preparing their briefings for Phase I, that
attorneys for SSRC, the City of Temecula, and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission
Indians have been cooperating in preparing the Briefs for Phase I which asserts that the
Valley Rainbow Project is not needed and should be denied by the Commission at this time
based on the evidence and testimony submitted during the May hearings;
. That the Opening Brief was filed on July 12th which presented arguments demonstrating that
the project was not needed and should be denied; that the Reply Brief was to be filed by
August 5th which responds to arguments made by the Independent System Operator (ISO)
and SDG&E in the Opening Briefs in Phase I, and that closing arguments before the PUC
were scheduled for August 20th at which time it would be argued that the project should be
denied;
. That it is not clear when a decision would be issued on the "need" question addressed in
Phase I;
R:IMinutes1073002
2
. That the project could be denied at this time, that no decision could be made and the project
could proceed to Phase II, or that it could be determined there was a need for the project
and then the project would proceed to Phase II; noted that deadlines for testimony and
briefing for Phase II of the proceeding were set by the Commission at the onset of the
proceeding, the earliest of which would be this fall;
. That the City of Murrieta has joined the Cities of Hemet and Temecula with funding to hire
public relations experts as well as other experts to research avenues to bring attention to the
cause, that SSRC's attorneys and the joined cities and their attorneys were planning
strategy for potential future phases of the Valley Rainbow proceedings, that SSRC was
continuing to build alliances with organizations which would assist in the public process, that
due to letter-writing campaigns potentially more than 2,000 letters will have been sent to the
Governor by the end of August, and that the City of Temecula's website has a sample letter
to the Governor, encouraging the City of Murrieta to also have the draft letter (to the
Governor) available on its website;
. That fundraising efforts continue to pay the attorneys' fees; and
. That the efforts of SSRC's volunteers and staff have been very diligent, taking the time to
attend meetings and community forums to inform the public of the concerns associated with
the project, and to engage the media to cover this issue.
Councilman Enochs, echoed by Councilman Comerchero, thanked the SSRC for all their
assiduous efforts regarding this particular project.
In response to Councilman Enochs, Ms. Wilder relayed that it would be helpful if the City of
Murrieta had a section of its website dedicated to this issue, as well as assisting in eliciting the
support of developers; for Councilman van Haaster, noted that via contact with her, additional
information could be obtained regarding the project; and for Councilman Comerchero, advised
that it was her understanding that Congressman Issa was supporting the western route, noting
that the matter was being investigated.
Mayor Roberts noted his dismay with the lack of support by the County Board of Supervisors
regarding this issue (opposition to the project); relayed the concerns of the Temecula Valley
Winegrowers Association (based on quarterly meetings he has attended) associated with the
SDG&E Valley Rainbow Project due to the potential loss of millions of dollars in lost future
revenue, which would also impact the County.
For Mayor Roberts, Ms. Wilder provided information regarding SSRC's meeting with Supervisor
Venable whereby technical data regarding the lack of need for the project was presented;
advised that if SSRC would be open to any recommendations the Council members had on
avenues to further address the issue with the Supervisors.
In response to Councilman Pratt, Ms. Wilder confirmed that the costs associated with
implementing high voltage underground facilities were the concern of SDG&E.
For Councilman Pratt, SSRC staff indicated that the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
associated with Phase II of the project includes an alternative regarding under grounding the
lines.
R:IMinutes1073002
3
Ms. Mary Ann Edwards, representing Citizens Alliance for Reliable Enterprise (CARE), advised
that if the PUC determined that there was a need for the project, CARE would support the
easterly remote route which traversed through the Cleveland National Forest, noting CARE's
fear that if "need" was determined and an alternate route had not been identified and explored;
provided additional information regarding the Forest Service's lack of support for the western
route, copies of CARE's correspondence regarding the project, and various additional
documentation.
For Councilman Comerchero, Ms. Edwards clarified that in all CARE's communications it was
stated that the support for the easterly route was only in the case it was determined that there
was a need for the project; confirmed that CARE has not take a specific position opposing the
need for the project, relaying that it was the aim of CARE to fill the void whereupon if it was
ultimately determined that there was a need for the project, there would be expressed support of
an alternate location for the line.
Councilman Comerchero, echoed by Councilman Pratt, noted his concern specifically due to
CARE not clarifying its opposition to the project, and advocating a specific route, that passive
approval of the project was being provided.
For Councilman Naggar, Ms. Edwards provided additional information regarding the CARE
organization.
Councilman van Haaster relayed a desire for the Murrieta Council members to meet with CARE
organization representatives in order to gain a better understanding as to the organization's
direction.
For Mayor Roberts, Temecula City Manager Nelson relayed that staff would provide additional
information regarding CARE, and its correspondences associated with the project.
At this time the Councils considered Agenda Item NO.1.
1 Discussion of Riverside County Inteqrated Plan (RCIP) and Transportation Issues
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Discuss RCIP and Transportation issues.
Relaying various transportation issues associated with the Riverside County Integrated Plan
(RCIP), Director of Public Works Hughes, representing the City of Temecula, specified the
following:
> That per the. County's analysis, the freeway corridors (the 1-15 and the 215) will be
experiencing a great increase in traffic with the development of the County over the next 25
years;
> That in the year 2025 there could be more than 240,000 vehicle trips on the 1-15 Freeway,
south of the "Y," and at build out more than 340,000 trips per day.
> That while the majority of the arterial systems within Southwest Riverside County was
anticipated to be operating at relatively satisfactory levels of service according to the
County's data, that typically the impacts to the arterial systems were substantial when the
major backbone infrastructure was failing.
R:\MinutesI073002
4
That the City of Temecula has had numerous meetings with County staff regarding the land
use proposals;
That it would take a multi-dimensional approach to attempt to accommodate the grow1h of
Riverside County, and that the following would be important components: seeking job
development in our communities to balance the commuter issues, implementation of Park
and Ride facilities, Measure A funds, and the Transportation Uniform Mitigatjon Fees
(TUMF);
>
>
>
Provided the status of two important transportation projects, as follows:
o
The French Valley Interchange Project which was recently approved by
Caltrans via a preliminary project study report; noted that efforts would next be
expended to develop a project report, as well as conducting design and
environmental work necessary; that funding sources would need to be identified
(I.e., Measure A, TUMF, local funding); that this particular project was critical (to
both cities) in balancing the County impacts; noted the commitment of over $5
million in City funds to accelerate various right-of-way acquisitions for this project;
and provided additional information regarding the associated improvements the
Harveston Project will be required to implement with development; and
o
The Eastern Bypass Project which has been a CET AP corridor under study by
the County; relayed that efforts have been made to identify that the project is
needed to help balance the projected volumes on the 1-15 and the 215 Freeways;
that as to the specific location, the City of Temecula was opposed to the current
identified location of Butterfield Stage Road; that since the land uses the County
intends to develop would be generating the high volumes of traffic, it was the
opinion of City staff that it was the County's responsibility to identify a north/south
corridor to alleviate those impacts, but not at the expense of the Temecula
residents.
Via overheads, Environmental and Transportation Planning Manager Miller, representing the
City of Murrieta, provided a general update regarding the RCIP, noting the three primary
components of the plan, as follows:
> The Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), which encompassed the aim to
acquire an additional 153,000 acres of priyate property, noting that this plan only includes
U.s. Fish&Wildlife clearance, that regarding the funding for this project, there would be a
Habitat Fee, Measure A funds would be impacted, as well as TUMF fees mostly likely being
contributed to this plan.
> Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP), which
would encompass funding work for two of the seven studied corridors; provided additional
information regarding the need for an eastern bypass; noted that CETAP was identified in
Measure A; and emphasized the importance of acquiring right-of way.
> The General Plan Update which would encompass the development of a Zoning Map;
noted that once the Zoning Map was produced there was a commitment to a five-year
moratorium for amendments to the General Plan; provided additional information regarding
the goal to create community centers which were more pedestrian-friendly; advised that with
R:\Minutes\073002
5
the General Plan Update the County would also be updating the Circulation Element; and
highlighted the anticipated traffic volumes.
For Councilman Enochs, Mr. Miller relayed that approximately 500 acres in the City of Murrieta
would be included in the additional 153,000 acres in the MSHCP; in response to Mayor Roberts'
comments regarding the similar impacts to residents if a route was developed on Butterfield
Stage Road or on Clinton Keith Road, advised that the route (eastern bypass) developed would
need to be an expressway with medians and restricted access to adequately address the traffic
impacts.
In response to Mayor Roberts' request, Mr. Hughes provided an overview of the most recent
discussions regarding the eastern bypass, noting that during discussions regarding developing
the routes which would be funded by Development Impact Fees via TUMF, the City of Temecula
has been supporting a four-lane expressway system which would be a north/south corridor to
the east of the City and would ultimately connect back to the 1-15 Freeway south of Temecula,
reiterating the opposition to this route being developed along Butterfield Stage Road; and noted
the importance of TUMF being one of the funding mechanisms for the corridor, advising that
potentially $120,000 million could come from this funding source towards the development of
the corridor.
Councilman van Haaster recommended that there be a formal joint (including the Cities of
Murrieta and Temecula) effort to address the corridor issue in order that the Cities become
active proponents with a recommended solution.
Councilman Enochs relayed that since constructing a corridor route of this magnitude would be
an extremely timely process, that the cities should support a solution to mitigate the impacts of
the anticipated trips on the freeway before it is too late.
For Councilman Enochs, Mr. Hughes relayed the rationale for the proposal to develop a 4-lane
expressway and the support received by the associated entities.
Concurring with Councilman van Haaster, Councilman Comerchero advised that it would be'
beneficial to form a Joint MurrietalTemecula Subcommittee in order to explore regional
transportation issues.
For informational purposes, Mr. Miller advised that joint comments should be relayed by
approximately September 1, 2002.
Councilman Pratt noted the importance on focusing on transit (e.g., bus rapid transit) and not
the building of additional roadways.
It was the consensus of both Councils to agendize the issue (on the subsequent City Council
agendas) to form a Subcommittee with two members from each City's Council to address the
discussed regional transportation issues.
Mayor Pro Tem Youens noted the strength of working together to address these critical issues.
Mayor Roberts recommended that the Subcommittee discussions include Metrolink, as well as
high-speed rail issues.
Councilman Naggar commented on the negative impacts to the cities due to development in the
French Valley, with no provisions for libraries and parks, and the City's commitment of $5 million
R:IMinutes1073002
6
for a regional project, the French Valley Parkway; and complimenting the City of Murrieta
regarding the Jefferson Road Widening Project, queried the Murrieta Council and staff as to the
anticipated timing of extending Ynez and Diaz Roads into Murrieta.
For Councilman Naggar, Councilman van Haaster relayed that although there was concurrence
that the Diaz and Ynez Roads Extension Projects were necessary, that the City of Murrieta does
not have funding at this time to address the increased resulting traffic these projects would
generate in the City of Murrieta. Mr. Miller, echoed by Councilman Enochs, noted the City of
Murrieta's priority projects which encompassed eight freeway interchanges and the three bridge
projects, confirming that Murrieta does not have the necessary facilities to accept the additional
traffic if these roads were extended at this time.
Councilman Comerchero recommended that the Diaz and Ynez Roads Extension Projects be
agendized as a discussion topic for the Subcommittee in order that an expected timeframe
could be developed; and provided additional information regarding efforts to obtain funding for
the Date/Cherry Streets Interchange, recommending that there be a joint (with both Cities and
the County) recommendation forwarded to Congressman Issa regarding the half funding of the
project.
In response to Councilman Comerchero , Councilman van Haaster relayed that while the City of
Murrieta was not opposed to the Interchange Project that there were concerns regarding the
relative phasing and funding.
It was determined that the Interchange Project would be added to the Subcommittee's Agenda.
With respect to the RCIP, Temecula City Manager Nelson relayed that it was critical that the
County be encouraged to have an infrastructure-phasing plan connected with the issuance of
certain building permits.
Councilman van Haaster advised that if the cities of Southwest County worked together,
speaking as one voice, it would have a significant impact on Riverside County; and with respect
to Councilman Pratt's point of view regarding traffic issues, relayed that he reads the data
Councilman Pratt (orwards him, concurring that even after billions of dollars have been spent on
infrastructure, the projected traffic impacts for 20 to 30 years from now were dismal, advising
that as soon as this fact was realized, traffic alternatives would be more likely to be considered.
In response to Councilman van Haaster, Councilman Pratt noted the importance of focusing on
transporting people (via alternate modes of transit) verses the focus being on moving cars,
advising that this has been accomplished in other cities and could be accomplished here.
Mayor Pro Tem Youens concurred with the benefits of the two cities working together to jointly
address these critical County issues, Councilman Comerchero concurring that efforts should be
expended to move forward as a cohesive unit.
It is noted that Item No.2 was considered prior to consideration of Item No.1; see page
1. At this time the Councils considered Agenda Item No.3.
3 General Discussion
With respect to obtaining funding for much-needed transportation projects, Councilman van
Haaster reiterated the importance of forming a joint political force in Southwest Riverside
R:IMinutes1073002
7
County to more effectively influence Measure A, Riverside County Transportation Committee
(RCTC) and Western Riverside County Council of Government (WRCOG) issues, and to ensure
that the Southwest County's point of view was well represented.
Additional discussion ensued regarding the roles of WRCOG and RCTC.
Mayor Pro Tem Youens noted his gratitude to both City's staff for their efforts organizing this
joint meeting, recommending that the joint meetings be held bi-annually at a minimum.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:59 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the Joint City Council/Planning Commission
Workshop to the next Temecula City Council regular meeting on Tuesday, August 13, 2002,
7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\MinutesI073002
8
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $3,438,338.68.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 17th day of September, 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R/Resos2002/Resos 02-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 02-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 17th day of September, 2002 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos2002/Resos 02-
2
I
I
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
08122/02 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08130102 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09/05102 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08129/02 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR D9/17/D2 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
165
190
192
193
194
210
261
280
300
320
330
340
390
460
470
001
165
190
192
193
194
280
300
320
330
340
GENERAL FUND
RDA-LOWIMOD INCOME HOUSING
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
RDA-REDEVELOPMENT
INSURANCE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
RDA DEBT SERVICE
CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND
CFD 98-1 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
GENERAL FUND
RDA-LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERViCE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
RDA-REDEVELOPMENT
INSURANCE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
PREPARED BY RETA WESTON, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST
TOTAL BY FUND:
"'-'-:it=
I SSI~NCE DIRECTOR
SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER
$
374.328.62
2,292,941.33
471,265.76
299.802.97
$
3,438,338,68
$ 776.409.12
19.202.88
210.233.18
49.81
65.380.84
417.46
218.510.05
5.614.75
19,896.51
14.782.06
49.965.00
3.357.57
23.175.08
100.00
1,095,376.51
636,064.89
$ 3,138,535.71
$ 196,269.32
4,670.65
75,569.26
73.54
4,251.78
621.65
2,032.27
985.98
8,117.22
1,921,65
5,289.65 299,802.97
$ 3,438,338.68
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT
. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT,
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
0812212002 .3:09:59PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78784 8122/2002 003157 A M A /KEY PRODUCTIVITY Front desk Security Sem: 1 0/15 & 10/1 507.00 507.00
78785 8122/2002 005288 AOAMS, GREG Reimb:Rvsd Paramedic Certification 75.00 75.00
78786 8122/2002 002877 AL TA LOMA CHARTER LINES Excursion bus svc:Knott's 1,684.20
Excursion bus svc:Skate City 320.80 2,005.00
78787 8122/2002 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. Acosta temp help PPE 08103 1,060.00
Arreola temp help PPE 07/06102 897.00 1,957.00
78788 8122/2002 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY Activewear inventory Team Pace 627.50
Finance dept staff shirts 362.04
Creditorder missing one shirt -25.86 963.68
78789 8122/2002 005197 ARTUKOVICH, JERRY, C. EntertainmentSummer Concert Saris 700_00 700.00
78790 8122/2002 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV Construct statue wall:Duck Pond 10,972.00
Construct & Install Traffic Control 2,767.00 13,739.00
78791 8122/2002 005308 BOLECHOWSKI, JOY Refund:Aquatics-Ufeguard Training 130.00 130.00
78792 8122/2002 005306 BOTTO. MARIA ESTELA Refund: Tiny Tots-Creative Beg 30.00 30.00
78793 8122/2002 005292 BUTLER. GREG Reimb:Caltrans Mtg:8112 84.50 84.50
78794 8122/2002 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES Jul-Aug Old Twn restroom rental 1,652.00 1 ,652.00
78795 8122/2002 001374 CALIF SECRETARY OF STATE Notary mbshp:Susan Jones 40.00 40.00
78796 8122/2002 005297 CASTELLI. VINCENT Refund: Parking Citation 29636 325.00 325.00
78797 8122/2002 004161 CD TOONS EntertainmentEmployee Picnic 300.00 300.00
78798 8122/2002 002147 COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS & Entertainment for Family Fun Night 200.00 200.00
78799 8/22/2002 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 125 - 12V BATTERY FOR UPS 7.811.88
97 - 12v Batterys for UPS Replacemen 1,874.65 9,686.73
78800 8122/2002 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Elect repairs @ TCSD 16.70 16.70
78801 8122/2002 005290 CORPORATE COMPLIANCE CE Annual Minutes Compliance 100.00 100.00
78802 8122/2002 003739 COTTON BELAND ASSOCIATE Consultant svcs:Update general plan 3,390.20 3,390.20
78803 8122/2002 005284 CUTTING EDGE, VINYL GRAPHI employee's picnic vinyl banners 160.00 160.00
78804 8122/2002 004810 DAVID-RICHARDS ELECTRIC I Asphalt patching repairs citywide 789.90 789.90
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
08122/2002 3:09:59PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78805 8/22/2002 005291 DEGANGE, JOHN Reimb:ESRI conf:07/09 97.45 97.45
78806 8/22/2002 005305 DENISON, CASEY Refund: Gymnastics - Circus Camp 175.00 175.00
78807 8/22/2002 003006 DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING Res impr prgm: Flores 1.875.00
Res impr prgm: Stevens 1,750.00 3,625.00
78808 8/22/2002 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELI Fuel for city vehicles 522.25 522.25
78809 8/22/2002 004985 DREAMPAINTING INC Res Impr Prgm: Gilkey, Sandy 1,580.00 1,580.00
78810 8/22/2002 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVICES Montecino temp help PPE 08/09 2,264.80
Rosales temp help PPE 08/09/02 1 ,828.49
Bragg temp help PPE 08/09 1 ,726.20
HEER TEMP HELP PPE 08/09/02 1 ,600.48
Obmann temp help PPE 08/09/02 1 ,527.92
WYTRYKUS TEMP HELP PPE 08/ 1,186.83
Rosa temp help PPE 08/09/02 1,126.48
Martinez temp help PPE 08/09/02 1,058.40
CAMMAROTA TEMP HELP PPE 08 854.28 13,153.88
78811 8/22/2002 003223 EDAW INC Environmental consulting svc:Pala Sr 659.38 859.38
78812 8/22/2002 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC Inforum gold upgrade:Prjt Mgmt 718.75
Inforum gold upgrade: Exp Reimb 342.50 1,061.25
78813 8/22/2002 005286 EDMONDS, GARY Mileage relmb for fire inspections 43.80 43.80
78814 8/22/2002 005052 EMCOR SERVICE Repair compressor @ museum 446.17
Relocate ductwork in city mgrs dept 90.00
CreditTruck chrg8 not part of agrment -20.00
CreditTruck chrge not part of agrment -25.00 491.17
78815 8/22/2002 003665 EMERITUS COMMUNICATIONS July long distance phone 5VCS 588.30 588.30
78816 8/22/2002 002577 ENGINEERING RESOURCES Engineer svcs:John Warner Rd Imprv 5.905.00 5,905.00
78817 8/22/2002 005115 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR INC Van rental for SMART Excursions 94.73 94.73
78818 8/22/2002 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION Building & Safety plan check svcs 11,312.92 11,312.92
78819 8/22/2002 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERING City Clerk Team Building Follow up 163.83
RefrshmntStaff/Mgmt Brainstorm:Pfan 125.04 288.87
78820 8/22/2002 003959 EVERETT & EVERETT PAINTI Res Impr prgm: Sanchez, April 1,800.00 1,800.00
Page2
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
0812212002 3:09:59PM City ofTemecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALtFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78821 8/22/2002 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUNE LDSCP IMPR:PASEO PARK 388.49
JUNE LDSCP IMPR:RANCHO HIGHL 265.96
July Idscp impr:Winchester Creek 187.63
JUNE LDSCP IMPR: VAIL RANCH 160.13
JUNE LDSCP IMPR:JOHN MGEE PR 149.12
JUNE LDSCP IMPR:CAMPOS VERD 100.97
MAY LDSCP IMPR:BUTTERFIELD S 71.63
JULY LDSCP IMPR:WINCHESTER C 50.00
June Idscp impr:Paseo Park 50.00 1,423.93
78822 8/22/2002 004464 EXXONMOBIL CARD SERVICES Fuel expense for City vehicles 125.22 125.22
78823 8/22/2002 000478 FAST SIGNS Old town jail signs 1.456.78
Fae impr prgm:Rancho Atty svc sign 1 ,098.20
Restroom w/arrow signs 614.18 3,169.16
78824 8/22/2002 005289 FEHLER, DEAN Reimb:Rvsd Paramedic Certification 75.00 75.00
78825 8/22/2002 001511 FIELD MAN ROLAPP & ASSOCIA Financial advisory svs:Wolf Creek CF 1,188.80 1,188.80
78826 8/22/2002 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER xx-5288 Jones:EarthlinklComputer 1,164.58
xx-3063 Naggar:Prof Mlgs & Con! 1,068.12
)()(-0902 O'Grady:ICMA ConflUnited Ai 972.00
)()(-4117 Hughes:Prof Mlg in Twn 52.45 3,257.15
78827 8/22/2002 004239 FISHER MERRIMAN SEHGAL July Design svcs:Old Twn Theatre 47,250.00 47,250.00
78828 8/22/2002 003281 FOREMOST FIRE PROMOTION FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC ED MAT 410.81 410.81
78829 8/22/2002 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS Old Town plaza lighting fixtures 3,628.12
Fae Impr Prgm:Thome,Steven 3,442.61
Deduction: BCSE_ 404757 -25.00 7,045.73
78830 8/22/2002 005304 GANIME, MARITZA Refund: Tiny Tots-Creative Beg 30.00 30.00
78631 8/22/2002 005307 GELINAS, ELENA Refund:Tiny Tots-Creative Beg 170.00 170.00
78832 8/22/2002 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORPORAT Binding supplies for copy center 42.68
Binding supplies for copy center 37.66 80.34
78833 8/22/2002 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Office Supplies:TCSD 1,410.95
Office Supplies: City Clerk 557.80 1,968.75
78834 8/22/2002 004607 GRACE BUILDING Custodial svcs for Old Twn restrooms 3,925.00 3.925.00
78835 8/22/2002 004053 HABITAT WEST INC Long Canyon Basin Mntc 761.66 761.66
78836 8/22/2002 005293 HANSEN INFORMATION Innovative Gov't Conf:8125-27:Windsor 1.190.00 1,190,00
78837 8/22/2002 000871 HILTON Hotel:McBride:conf# RRCYG:11/18-22 909.06 909.06
Page3
apChkLst Final Cheek List Page: 4
0812212002 3:09:59PM City of Temeeula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Cheek # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Cheek Total
78838 8/22/2002 003624 HOWELL, ANN MARIE Graphic design tourism CD labels 19.95 19.95
78839 8/22/2002 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I Pool sanitizing chemicals 445.73 445.73
78840 8/22/2002 000388 INTL CONFERENCE BLOG Uniform building code books 393.77 393.77
78841 8/22/2002 005310 IRION, JEANA Refund: Sports Mini-Hawk 84.00 84.00
78842 8/22/2002 005309 KEMP, JAYLEE Refund: Swim Lessons Level 1 30.00 30.00
78843 8/22/2002 005287 KEY 3 MEDIA GROUP Comdex conf:McBride:po22443622 100.00 100.00
78844 8/22/2002 000205 KIDS PARTIES ETC Party hostess:Employee Picnic 1,570.00 1,570.00
78845 8/22/2002 005303 KINDERCARE LEARNiNG CENT Refund: Grading Deposit 29974 parcei 995.00 995.00
78846 8/22/2002 000206 KINKOS INC Stationery paper/mise supplies 41.72 41.72
78847 8/22/2002 004850 LIBERTY COLLISION CENTER towing sves for police dept 250.00 250.00
78848 8/22/2002 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICE July sves-library system agrmnt 1 1 ,056.77
July sves-library system agrmt 1 ,332.32 12,389.09
78849 8/22/2002 005285 L1FWIN,INC Fire Prevention staff teambuilding 113.14 113.14
78B50 8/22/2002 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS Various Street Signs/Hardware 2,493.07 2.493.07
78851 8/22/2002 004068 MANALlLI, AILEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 686.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 280.00 966.00
78852 8/22/2002 005302 MEYER, SUSAN LEE Refund:Parking Cit# 22356 325.00 325.00
78853 8/22/2002 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:HOGAN/BROWNI 344.58
QTY 2000 POLICE LETTERHEAD 115.63
Business Cards:R.Rush 42.83 503,04
78854 8/22/2002 001868 MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 571.20 571.20
78855 8/22/2002 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATTN: Jul SMART Prgm Display Ads 261.38 261.38
78856 8/22/2002 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS Office Supplies:P.D. Main Station 64.33 64.33
78857 8/22/2002 005301 ORTENZO, ELIZABETH Refund: Parking cite# 46327 325.00 325.00
78858 8/22/2002 005300 PAQUIA, M. ARLENE Refund:Summer Day Camp 70.00 70,00
78859 8/22/2002 005019 PARK SPECIALTIES Upgrd Playground Equip:Vail Ranch P 22,589.23 22.589.23
Page:4
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
08122/2002 3:09:59PM City 01 Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78850 8/22/2002 005295 PATTERSON,SHARON Refund:Art-Portrait Drawing 35.00 35.00
78851 8/22/2002 000249 PETTY CASH Petty cash reimbursement 324.48 324.48
78852 8/22/2002 001999 PITNEY BOWES postage meter rental 07/03102 - 09/30 293.48 293.48
78853 8/22/2002 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR Res lmprv prgm: De La Torre 770.00 770.00
78854 8/22/2002 004453 R C ENTERPRISES Self-Inking Stamps for Finance- 143.31 143.31
78855 8/22/2002 000252 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST Various water meters 13,557.53 13.557.53
78855 8/22/2002 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & June 2002 legal services 113,283.44 113,283.44
78857 8/22/2002 001355 RIVERSIDE CO Annual permit renewal:TCC 368.00 358.00
78868 8/22/2002 001309 RUSE, PHYLLIS Reimb:membership to SCAN NATOA 75.00 75.00
78859 8/22/2002 005227 SAN DIEGO CO OF THE DA Deduction: BCSE_ 404757:Freedom Signs 25.00 25.00
78870 8/22/2002 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE May Various Recruit Ads for H.R. 2,040.84
May Various Recruit Ads for H.R. 1,289.58
Jun Various Recruit Ads for H.R. 957.40 4,287.82
78871 8/22/2002 005278 SCIENCE ENRICHMENT SRVCS TCSD Instructor Earnings 13,314.40
leSO Instructor Earnings 12,811.20 26,125.50
78872 8/22/2002 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA' TES pool maintenance services 828.00 828.00
78873 8/22/2002 005294 SIEGEL, LINDA Refund:Exercise-Relax & Breath 20.00 20.00
78874 8/22/2002 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Jul 2-00-397-5059 various meters 4,368.82
Aug 2-19-999-9442 Various Meters 2,032.77
CredltLate fee due to disputed chrgs -20.43 6,381.16
78875 8/22/2002 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Aug 091-024-9300-5 CRC 469.54
Aug 133-040-7373-0 West Wing 19.15
Aug 101-525-0950-0 TCC 17.67 506.36
78876 8/22/2002 000455 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN TeSD Instructor Earnings 550.00
TeSO Instructor Earnings 204.00 754,00
78877 8/22/2002 005299 TAYLOR, BABE-RUTH Refund:Ex-San Diego Wild Animal Prk 60.00 60.00
78878 8/22/2002 000310 TEMECULA CREEK INN INC Refund:Eng Deposit:44501 Rnbw Cyn 995.00 995.00
78879 8/22/2002 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187.20 187.20
78880 8/22/2002 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-5072 GENERAL USAGE 5,379.75
AUG XXX-0073 GENERAL USAGE 1,953.01 8,332.77
PageS
apChkLst
0812212002
Final Check List
City of Temecula
3:09:59PM
Page: 6
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid
78881 8/22/2002 004200 VERIZON WIRELESS LLC Replacement Pager:J.Stone 34.50
78882 8/22/2002 005298 VRT SQUARE, LP Refund:Confonnance Plan:960-Q20-Q 333.00
78883 8/22/2002 004826 WEST COAST OVERHEAD 000 Res Imprv Prgm:Flores 650.00
78884 8/22/2002 005296 WILSON, ROBIN Refund:Parent & Me Swim Lessons 25.00
Sub total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA:
Check Total
34.50
333.00
650.00
25.00
374,328.62
Page:6
apChkLst
08122/2002 3:09:59PM
Final Check List
City 01 Temecula
Page: 7
101 checks In this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
374,328.62
Page:7
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
08130/2002 11 :49:45AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
30 8/29/2002 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREME Employees state retirement 43,084.11 43,084.11
31 8/28/2002 003228 US BANK TRUST NATIONAL AS Final payoff for refinancing CFO 98-1 636,064.89 636,084.89
32 8/29/2002 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) Employees fed pr taxes 12,951.90 12,951.90
33 8/29/2002 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Employees fed pr taxes 56,564.28 56,564.28
34 8/30/2002 003228 US BANK TRUST NATIONAL AS CFD 88-12 Debt Service Payment 1,095,376.51 1,095,376.51
78885 8/30/2002 004148 AT & T Long distance sves: P.O. 142.65 142.65
78886 8/30/2002 000745 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES Internet connection svcs:lnfo Sys 317.40 317.40
78887 8/30/2002 000745 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES Cellular phone svcs:police 253.76 253.76
78888 8/30/2002 000434 ACCElACOM Permits+ Level 1 train:Mclntyre/Ching 2,400.00 2.400.00
78889 8/30/2002 003859 ALL ABOUT SELF STORAGE Jul 02 -June 03 Storage Rental: Musel. 2,280.00 2,280.00
78890 8/30/2002 002877 AL TA LOMA CHARTER LINES Charter bus svc:San Diego Wild Anima 566.42
Charter bus svc:Castle Park BnlO2 100.00 666.42
78891 8/30/2002 005322 ALTERNATIVES TO OOMESTIC, SW Family Violence Cf:4 police 100.00 100.00
78892 8/30/2002 005037 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH I Citywide slurry seal prjt:PW02-05 286,350.52 286,350.52
78893 8/30/2002 000101 APPLE ONE, iNC. Acosta temp help PPE 08/10 1,182.00
Kissam temp help PPE 08110 104.00 1,286.00
78894 8/30/2002 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY LADIES V-NECK SPORT SHiRTS FO 807.05 807.05
78895 8/30/2002 004206 BANUELOS. TERESA TCSD instructor earnings 170.00 170,00
78896 8/30/2002 005327 BAUER, JUDY Refund: Security Deposit 215.00 215.00
78897 8/30/2002 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV Repairs P.C.C. flow line Vintage Hills 9.254.00 9,254.00
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
0813012002 11:49:45AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78898 8130/2002 005326 BERRY, TERRELL Refund: Security Deposit 100.00 100.00
78899 8/30/2002 004262 BIO- TOX LABORA TORI ES DUI/Drug/Alcohol Screening Svcs 644.S0
DUIIDrug/Alcohol Screening Svcs 249.40 893.90
78900 8/30/2002 005331 BROWN, DIANA Refund: Picnic Shelter rental cancalle 25.00 25.00
78901 8/30/2002 005321 CA ASSOC OF CODE ENFORCE Annual CACE Sem:9/4-5:Cole 295.00 295.00
78902 8/30/2002 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES I O'Grady bond renewal 9/02-9/03 350.00 350.00
78903 8/30/2002 000413 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GAME Extension Fee:Mowing Murrieta Crk 127.25 127.25
78904 8/30/2002 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICElACCT Fingerprints info for new ae 1,512.00 1,512.00
78905 8/30/2002 002534 CATERERS CAFE refreshments:Fire Prey Staff MtgITea 78.00 78.00
78906 8/30/2002 000137 CHEVRON USA INC Fuel expense for city vehicles 258.25 258.25
78907 8/30/2002 005155 CLARK, JUDY Refund: Summer Day Camp 155.00 155.00
78908 8/30/2002 004017 COMERCHERO, JEFF Reimb:Nat'l League Steering Comm:6/ 136.45
Reimb:League Exec Forum:7/24-27 49.07 185.52
78909 8130/2002 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARI Employees Charities contributions 136.50 136.50
78910 8/30/2002 005324 CROSSROADS CHURCH Refund: Security Deposit 100.00
Refund: Security Deposit 39.50 139.50
78911 8130/2002 001009 DB X INC Trffc Signal Modil Jefferson/Overland 6,100.00 6,100.00
78912 8/30/2002 004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES Sept Lease:Potice sub-sin in Old Tow 1,849.64 1,849.64
78913 8/30/2002 002900 DANIEL MANN JOHNSON Prof Svcs Agrmnt Pechanga Pkwy (P 1,405.68 1,405.68
78914 8/30/2002 001716 DANS ROOFING Replace roof tiles @ Pala Park 500.00 500.00
78915 8/30/2002 003383 OEAMER APPLIANCE SERVICE Plumber svcs for fire sin 84 200.82 200.82
Page2
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
08/3012002 11 :49:45AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78916 8130/2002 003006 DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING Res lmpr prgm: Bidding 2,765.00 2,765.00
78917 8130/2002 004294 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE CO. Rei Retention:PWOl-21 Stn92 2,378.48
Rei Retention:PWOl-21 Stn92 Ldscp 572.28 2,950.76
78918 8130/2002 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELI Fuel for city vehicles 48.87 48.87
78919 8130/2002 005052 EMCOR SERVICE H.V.A.C. repair @ City Hall 352.41
H.V.A.C. repair @ CRC 171.25
H.V.A.C. repair @ City Hall 155.00
CreditTruck chrge not part of agrment -25.00
CreditTruck chrge not part of agrment -25.00
Credit:Truck chrge not part of agrment -25.00 603.66
78920 8130/2002 005251 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE Mobile Equip & Truck Repair Svcs:PW 368.17
Mobile Equip & Truck Repair Svcs:PW 345.51
Mobile Equip & Truck Repair Svcs:PW 76.56
Mobile Equip & Truck Repair Svcs:PW 72.52 862.76
78921 8130/2002 000478 FAST SIGNS More shops signs for Old Twn 1,012.85
After school hours signs:TCSD 80.54
Exhibit Signs for Museum 79.90 1,173.29
78922 8130/2002 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL MED ( Pre-employment physicals 160.00 160.00
78923 8130/2002 000795 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS/CARE Advanced Access Sem:Robinson 149.00 149.00
78924 8130/2002 005317 GRACE CHAPEL AFRICAN MET Refund: Security Deposit 155.00 155.00
78925 8130/2002 002906 HEMET FENCE COMPANY Res Impr Pgrm:De La Torre, A 2,320.00 2,320.00
78926 8130/2002 004943 HOUSTON RIDGE PAINTING C Res Impr Pgrm:Shaw, M 300.00 300.00
78927 8130/2002 004833 IMPERIAL PAVING COMPANY I AC/PCC Grinding to correct "DipN Haz 2.700.00 2,700.00
78928 8130/2002 001517 INTEGRATED INSIGHTS DBA: H Employee Assistance Program 582.54 582.54
78929 8130/2002 001407 INTER V ALLEY POOL SUPPLY I Pool sanitizing chemicals 330.58 330.58
78930 8130/2002 000388 INTL CONFERENCE BLOG OFF II Lateral Loads sem:Formoe 9/12 25.00 25.00
Page3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
0813012002 11 :49:45AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78931 8/30/2002 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS Crystal Reports Upgrade 8.5 Pro 5Use 831.83
Network Client Services 813.52
Network equipment mntclrepairs 97.33 1,542.68
78932 8/30/2002 003046 K FRO G 95.1 FM RADIO Broadcasting for Summer Nights 100.00 100.00
78933 8/30/2002 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES Harrington temp help PPE 07/14 1,080.00
Harrington temp help PPE 07/21 1,080.00
Harrington temp help PPE 08/04 1,080.00
Harrington temp help PPE 08/11 1,080.00
Harrington temp help PPE 07/07 884.25
Harrington temp help PPE 07/28 864.00 6,068.25
78934 8/30/2002 000206 KINKOS INC Stationery paper/mise supplies 88.30
Stationery paper/mise supplies 65.73
Statione'Y paper/mise supplies 51.29
Stationery paper/mise supplies 10.95 216.27
78935 8/30/2002 000488 KNOTTS BERRY FARM Day camp excursion - adult tickets 1,191.10 1,191.10
78936 8/30/2002 005325 LAFERA JR, GEORGE Refund: Security Deposit 100.00 100.00
78937 8/30/2002 005328 LAMBS FELLOWSHIP OF TEME Refund: Security Deposit 329,00 329.00
78938 8/30/2002 005323 LINFIELD SCHOOL, THE Refund: Security Deposit 100.00 100.00
78939 8/30/2002 000213 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMiS Membership 9/02-9/03 Thomhill 75.00 75.00
78940 8/30/2002 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SER Temp help w/e 7/14 Novotny 516.00
Temp help w/e 7/07 Novotny 283.80 799.80
78941 8/30/2002 004208 MILANOS Rfrshmnts:Council/Planning Comm wr 202.50
Refreshments:Dev. Process Review:? 99.00
Refreshments:Roripaugh mtg:8/05 47.25 348.75
78942 8/30/2002 005333 NATIONAL ASSOC CITIZENS/P Citizen Patrol Conf:Borok/O'Keefe:9/2 30.00 30.00
78943 8/30/2002 001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL Basketball Official Services 240.00
Basketball Official Services 132.00 372.00
78944 8/30/2002 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATTN: Jul display ads:CIP Constr Updates 825.18
Jul recruitment ads for H.R. 613.40 1,438.58
Page4
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
08130/2002 11 :49:45AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78945 8/30/2002 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS Planning Office Supplies 570.23
Planning Office Supplies 237.72
Planning Office Supplies 219.46
Credit items returned:Planning -6.18
Credit items returned:Planning -161.03 860.20
78946 8/30/2002 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City vehicle maint/repair svcs 1,022.84
City vehicle maintlrepair svcs 304.40
City vehicle maintJrepair svcs 176.70
City vehicle maintlrepair svcs 113.88
City vehicle maintlrepair svcs 110.52
REPAIR & MAINT OF VEHICLES- 68.05
REPAIR & MAINT OF VEHICLES- 68.05
City vehicle maintlrepair svcs 66.59
City vehicle maintJrepair SVCS 55.65
City vehicle maintlrepair svcs 54.23
City vehicle maint/repair svcs 19.19
City vehicle maint/repair svcs 19.19 2,079.29
78947 8/30/2002 001619 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER I Aug recruitment ads for H.R. 366.00 366.00
78948 8/30/2002 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA IN Recreation Supplies for MPSC 61.71
Recreation Supplies:Family Fun Night 43.66 105.37
78949 8/30/2002 004538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT COMPAN repair & maintenance of tractor:TCSD 310.63 310.63
78950 8/30/2002 004805 PEACOCK ENTERPRISES INC HP LASERJET 8550DN Printer 6,356.17
HP LASERJET 8550DN (C7098A) 2,451.31
HP Officejet Printer 799.51 9,606.99
78951 8/30/2002 005319 PEOPLES CHURCH OF THE VA Refund:Sec. Deposit:MS02-1769 100.00 100.00
78952 8/30/2002 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG Employee benefits 136.61 136.61
78953 8/30/2002 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN Jul recruitment ads for H.R. 3,430.72
Jul display ads:CIP Constr Updates 1,965.53
Jul Public Notices:City Clerk 104.34 5.500.59
78954 8/30/2002 005330 PROJECT KIDS OUTREACH Sponsorship:Project kids - Endless 1,500.00 1,500.00
78955 8/30/2002 002612 RADIO SHACK INC Misc Computer Supplies 150.46 150.46
78956 8/30/2002 000879 RADISSON HOTEL HTL:ACCELA TRAIN:MCINTYRElCHI 739.20 739.20
Pages
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6
08130/2002 11 :49:45AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78957 8/30/2002 005332 RAHN, WilLIAM Reimb:School Safety Conf:7/7-11/02 97.68 97.68
78958 8/30/2002 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST Various water meters 16,304.81, 16,304.81
78959 8/30/2002 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH City vehicle detailing & fuel usage 125.31
City vehicle detailing svcs 64.00
City vehicle detailing services 60.00
City vehicle detailing svcs 42.00
City vehicle detailing services 30.30
City vehicle detailing services 25.98
City vehicle detailing services 16.00
City vehicle detailing services 10.00
City vehicle detailing services 8.00 381.59
78960 8/30/2002 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS Dupl. Blueprints for Children's Museu 766.59
Dupl. Blueprints for Children's Museu 715.48
Dupl. Blueprints:Pala Rd Imprv 126.94
Dupl Blueprints for Land Dav. 19.29
Dupl. Blueprint for CIP Division 10.72
Dupl. Blueprint for CIP Division 6.47
Dupl. Blueprints:Pechanga Pkwy Impr 6.47
Dupl. Blueprints for Planning 5.50
Dupl. Blueprints for Land Dev. 5.39 1,662.85
78961 8/30/2002 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE Citywide Weed AbatementlDebris Rarr 5,000.00 5,000.00
78962 8/30/2002 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR May 2002 parking citation assessment 2,146.00
Jun parking citation assessment 1,947.50 4,093.50
78963 8/30/2002 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RECOF CEQA Compliance:PA99.0451 1,314.00 1,314.00
78964 8/30/2002 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RECOI July 2002 recordings & copies 10.00 10.00
78965 8/30/2002 005334 RIVERSIDE CO FACILITIES MG~ 2 yrs rent for Vail Ranch Interim Fire 2.00 2.00
78966 8/30/2002 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC Day Camp Supplies 122.80
Recreation Supplies:Family Fun Night 80.88 203.68
78967 8/30/2002 005329 SAFE AL TERNA TIVE FOR EVER FY 02/03 SAFE prgm Sponsorship 15,000.00 15,000.00
78968 8/30/2002 004562 SCHIRMER ENGINEERING COR Plan check svcs: Fire 4,200.00
Plan check svcs: Fire 200.00 4,400.00
Pages
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
0813012002 11 :49:45AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78969 8/30/2002 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER COM Recharge Fire Extinguisher's:PW veh 97.50
Fire extinguishers maintenance svcs 91.27
RECHARGE FIRE EXTiNGUISHER'S 52.50 241.27
76970 8/30/2002 003804 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEM TCSD Instructor Earnings 1,425.60 1,425.60
78971 8/30/2002 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Recreation Supplies - Teen Program 123.04
Supplies:Sister Gities Exchange prgm 60.99
Supplies:Sister Cities Exchange prgm 51.10
Recreation Supplies:Family Fun Night 11.27 246.40
78972 8/30/2002 005154 SMITH, ROBIN CREATE AND ADMINISTER A Bill 160.00 160.00
78973 8/30/2002 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Aug 2.0-397-5042 City Hall 7,706.88
Aug 2.02-351-4946 Senior Ctr 1,641.37
Aug 2.18.937-3152 Museum 1,012.24
Aug 2-00-397-5067 various meters 970.22
Aug 2.23.365-5992 Sin 92 540.57
Aug 2.20.817.9929 Old Town Stn 415.03
Aug 2.1 1-007-0455 61h St. 406.08
Aug 2-22-891-0550 various meters 267.50
Aug 2.18.049.6416 Front SI Ped 241.01
Aug 2.21-911-7892 So.Side Prk Lot 161.09
Aug 2.19-171.6568 Wed Chapel 107.76
Aug 2.21.981-4720 Hwy 79 70.01
Aug 2.22.496.3439 Winchester 45.85
Aug 2-22-057-2226 6th St 43.29
Aug 2-14.204.1615 Front St Radio 24.06
Aug 2-24-151.6582 Overland 19.50 13,672.46
78974 8/30/2002 005250 STARR, DEBRA release claims agreement payment 200.00 200.00
78975 8/30/2002 005320 SUTTON PLACE HOTEL Htl:CACE 2002 Seminar:Cole:9/04/02 130.90 130.90
78976 8/30/2002 002224 SYNDISTAR INC Public Education Materials:Fire Prevo 2,047.60 2,047.60
78977 8/30/2002 000305 TARGET STORE Summer Day Camp Supplies 65.61
Recreation Supplies - Family Fun Nig 17.50
Summer Day Camp Supplies 13.99
Summer Day Camp Supplies 11.62 108.72
78978 8/30/2002 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & PLU Various Parks Plumbing Services 120.00 120.00
78979 8/30/2002 005318 TEMECULA PLAY & LEARN SC Refund:Sec. DepositMS02.0879 100,00 100,00
Page:?
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
0813012002 11:49:45AM City 01 Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78980 8130/2002 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY, Maint Fae locksmith services 125.00
locksmith svcs:K. H. Park 55.39 180.39
78981 8130/2002 005316 THOMPSON, MICHELLE Refund:Tiny Tots - Creative Beg 143.75 143.75
78982 8130/2002 004979 TRINIDAD STEEL DRUM BAND EntertainmentSummer Nights:9/02 660.00 650.00
78983 8130/2002 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) PIT EE retirement pmt 4,573.22 4,573.22
78984 8/30/2002 002065 UNISOURCE paper supplies for Copy Center 1,228.54
Maintenance Supplies:TCC/CRC/Sr C 201.50
Credit items returned -52.80 1,377.24
78985 8130/2002 000325 UNITED WAY Employee contributions 255.80 255.80
78986 8130/2002 005315 VALLE, NADINE ACOSTA Refund:Sec. Deposit:MS02-206812156 106.00 106.00
78987 8130/2002 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA Duplicate payment of inv# 2039 4,391.00 4,391.00
78988 8/30/2002 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA Aug xxx-0074 general usage 256.25
AUG XXX-2626 PD TARGET STOREF 223.98
AUG XXX-1603 GENERAL USAGE 89.60
AUG XXX-3526 GENERAL USAGE 83.18
Aug xxx.3564 general usage 55.45
AUG XXX-8573 GENERAL USAGE 32.41
AUG XXX-2676 GENERAL USAGE 28.69
AUG XXX-3923 GENERAL USAGE 27.55 797.11
78989 8130/2002 004848 VERIZON SELECT SERVICES I Jul telecommunication svcs 1,303.98 1,303.98
78990 8130/2002 004268 WESTERN FIRE COMPANY TCC RE-CHRG KITCHEN FIRE SUPP 350.00 350.00
Sub total lor UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 2.292,941.33
Page:8
apChkLst
0813012002 11 :49:45AM
Final Check List
City of Temecula
Page: 9
111 checks In this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
2,292,941.33
Page:9
apChkLsI
08130/2002
11 :49:45AM
Final Check List
City of Temecula
Page: 10
<none)
Bank code: union
" " " !loid'Checks
Page:10
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
09/05/2002 3:34:36PM City olTemecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
78991 9/312002 005336 LOS ANGELES FREIGHT BROKE Duty chrges for Statue from Netherlan 540.73 540.73
78992 9/5/2002 005344 79 S. MOTORSPORTS, INC Refund:Cert~icate of Occupancy 30.00 30.00
78993 9/5/2002 005339 ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSION 12 issues of Admin Prof:City Mgr 48.00 48.00
78994 9/5/2002 002733 ALBAO, NANCY TCSD instructor earnings 1,506.00 1,506.00
78995 9/5/2002 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES Day camp excursion bus to Castle Prk 1 ,395.48
Day camp excursion bus to San Diego 501.25
Day camp excursion bus to Movie Exp 320.80 2,217.53
78996 9/5/2002 004431 AMERICAN PAYROLL INSTITU Year-End Sem:11/06:Jorgenson 329.00 329.00
78997 9/5/2002 004431 AMERICAN PAYROLL INSTITU Annual membership:Monica Jorgenso 155.00 155.00
78998 9/5/2002 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALL Animal control services for July 2002 9,584.04 9,584.04
78999 9/5/2002 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. Acosta temp help PPE 08117/02 1,182.00 1,182.00
79000 9/5/2002 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC Bottled wtr servs @ City Hall 597,07
Bottled wtr servs @ Mnte Fae 223.77
Bottled wtr servs @ CRC 151.92
Bottled wtr servs @ Museum 23.48 996.24
79001 9/5/2002 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TCSO staff team shirts 3,101.48
TCSD staff team shirts 806.51
TCSD staff doby caps 83.51
TCSD staff Red Jackets 66.81
City Clerk staff team shirts 22.63
Finance staff team shirts 12.93 4,093.87
79002 9/5/2002 005343 BEAZLEY,REBECCA Refund: Eng Depst 31083 Avenida Bu 995.00 995.00
79003 9/5/2002 005340 BENGTSON, CARRIE Refund: Summer Day Camp 200.00 200.00
79004 9/5/2002 004778 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC Design svcs:Pavement mgmnt update 7,065.20 7,065.20
79005 9/5/2002 005312 BITCH'N STITCH'N Safe driver award jackets for City staff 282.31 282.31
Page:l
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
09/0512002 3:34:36PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
79006 9/5/2002 003617 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL Misc. paramedic supplies:Fire 208.88 208.88
79007 9/5/2002 005345 BRIGHT, KATHLEEN Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons 25.00 25.00
79008 9/512002 005342 BRINGHURST, GREGORY Refund: Eng Depst 3883 tract map lot: 995.00 995.00
79009 9/5/2002 004176 BROADWING TELECOMMUNICA Long distance & intemet svcs 1,195.00 1,195.00
79010 9/5/2002 005347 BROWN, TAMI Refund: Summer Day Camp 155.00 155.00
79011 9/5/2002 005063 CELSOC Add't freight chrges for various manual 13.11 13.11
79012 9/512002 000154 CSMFO Applic. fee for budget award prgm 25.00
Applic. fee for Budget awards prgm 25.00 50.00
79013 9/5/2002 005346 CAHA, WENDE Refund: Level 2 Swim Lessons 35.00
Refund: Parent & Me Swim lessons 35.00 70.00
79014 9/5/2002 005338 CALIFORNIA RETAIL SURVEY Publication:Calif Retail Survey 2002e 172.40 172.40
79015 9/5/2002 004093 CARDIO CARE PLUS TCSD instructor earnings 1,215.00 1,215.00
79016 9/5/2002 002358 CERTIFIED FOLDER DISPLAY Tourism brochure distribution Souther 14,811.99 14,811.99
79017 9/5/2002 001326 CHULA VISTA, CITY OF Agency's share expense for CCPA tr 615.00 615.00
79018 9/5/2002 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL PC 07/09 - 08108 cellular phone svcs 5,629.22 5,629.22
79019 9/5/2002 003735 CINGULAR WIRELESS (EQUIP Cellular phone equipment 26.93 26.93
79020 9/5/2002 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF Nuts & Bolts conf:Rosa:09/19-20/02 200.00 200.00
79021 9/5/2002 005348 CLENDENON, KRISTA Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons 25.00
Refund: Parent & Me Swim Lessons 25.00
Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons 22.00
Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons 22.00 94.00
79022 9/5/2002 004626 COMFORT ZONE FURNITURE 3 chest of drawer:Fire Stn 92 702.53 702.53
Page2
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
09/0512002 3:34:36PM City 01 Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
79023 9/5/2002 001193 COMP USA INC Mise Computer supplies:lnfo Sys 111.58 111.58
79024 9/5/2002 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC Propane Gas for PW mntc Division 28.28 28.28
79025 9/5/2002 001393 DATA TICKET INC JULY PARKING CITATION PROCESE 253.20
July parking citation processing 140.00 393.20
79026 9/5/2002 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATES Retain advocacy firm:lobbyistlconsul 3,000.00 3,000.00
79027 9/5/2002 005349 DENOFRIO, RENEE Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons 25.00
Refund: Level 1 Swim Lessons 25.00 50.00
79028 9/5/2002 004294 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE CO. Mulch for Landscape at City's Fac 13,000.00 13,000.00
79029 9/5/2002 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVICES Naaseh-Shahry temp help PPE 07/26 6,236.00
Naaseh-Shahry temp help PPE 07/12 5,612.40
Naaseh-Shahry temp help PPE 08109 5,456.50
McCoy temp help PPE 08109/02 2,900.51
McCoy temp help PPE 08123/02 2,753.86
Hansen temp help PPE 08109/02 2,641.80
McCoy temp help PPE 07/26/02 2,607.20
McCoy temp help PPE 07/12/02 2.574.61
McClanahan/Ching temp help PPE 07 2.460.63
McClanahan/Ching temp help PPE 08 2,356.60
McClanahan/Ching temp help PPE 07 2,320.22
Hansen temp help PPE 07/26/02 2,283.27
Montecino temp help PPE 08/23/02 2,264.80
TEMP HELP - OFC ASST & BLDG IN 2,057.76
Obmann temp help PPE 08123/02 1,850.72
Rosales temp help PPE 08123/02 1,762,40
McClanahan/Ching temp help PPE 08 1,374.54
Kanigowski temp help PPE 08/09/02 1,326.19
Kanigowski temp help PPE 08123/02 1,258.40
Kanigowski temp help PPE 07/26/02 1,242.67
Martinez temp help PPE 08123/02 1,176.00
Kanigowski temp help PPE 07/12/02 1,101.10
Rosa temp help PPE 08123/02 1,061.90
TEMP HELP - OFC ASST & SLDG IN 908.36
Bragg temp help PPE 08123/02 863.10
Cammarota )emp help PPE 08123/02 607.03 59,258.57
79030 9/5/2002 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC EDEN USER CONF:10/14-17:KJ/P 1,050.00 1,050.00
79031 9/5/2002 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC 2002 Eden user cant: 1 O/14-17:Kruege 475.00
Eden User Conf:10/14-17:Gutierrez 350,00 825.00
Page3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
09105/2002 3:34:36PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
79032 9/5/2002 005115 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR INC Van rental for SMART Excursions 94.73 94.73
79033 9/5/2002 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE Idscp mntc:Neighborhood prks 92,445.00 92,445.00
79034 9/5/2002 002037 EXPANETS Telephone Maintenance Agmmt 7/15- 2,198.40
Installation Labor 1,076.00 3,274.40
79035 9/5/2002 000478 FAST SIGNS REIMBURSEMENT OF DEVELOPME 190.00 190.00
79036 9/5/2002 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC Express mail services 215.21
Express mail services 114.26 329.47
79037 9/5/2002 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOCIA Financial sves for Butterfield CFD 1,931.71
Financial sves for Butterfield CFD 1,256.00
Financial Bves for Butterfield CFD 834.75
Financial Bves for Butterfield CFD 171.50 4,193.96
79038 9/5/2002 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPP Preliminary Title Report:Library 500.00
Title report:Parksite "CII in Vail Ranch 500.00
Title report for 41281 Via Aguila 150.00 1,150.00
79039 9/5/2002 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER xx-6165 Yates:Prof mtgiconf/misc 2,926.70
xx-1405 Ubnoske: Prof MtgslStafl Edu 227.59 3,154.29
79040 9/5/2002 004239 FISHER MERRIMAN SEHGAL YP ARCHITECTUAL DESIGN:OLD TOW 889.69 889.69
79041 9/5/2002 005270 FLAGS UNLIMITED INC 4" X 6" Nylon Flag of the Netherlands 3,232.94 3,232.94
79042 9/5/2002 005196 GARVEY EQUIPMENT COMPAN Chainsaw & Chain for Stn 84 716.54 716.54
79043 9/5/2002 005337 GIANT PHOTO SERVICE Photo mural for E.S.Gardner 521.51 521.51
79044 9/5/2002 004159 GOODENOUGH, DONNA TCSD instructor earnings 112,00 112.00
79045 9/5/2002 004607 GRACE BUILDING MAINTENANC Custodial svcs for park restrooms 3,925.00 3,925.00
79046 9/5/2002 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED L1THOG Comm Recreation elr Brochures 1,888.86 1 ,888.86
79047 9/5/2002 005350 HARGROVE, GINA Refund: level 4 Swim Lessons 25,00 25,00
79048 9/5/2002 002767 IDENTICATOR CORPORATION Fingerprint equip & Supplies:Police De 556.76 556.76
Page:4
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
09105/2002 3:34:36PM City 01 Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
79049 9/5/2002 004288 IMITATORS OF ROCK LEGEND High Hopes Program Entertainment 9/ 600.00 600.00
79050 9/5/2002 004219 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GR Mote supplies for PW Mote Division 197.19 197.19
79051 9/5/2002 003670 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR CO~ Repairs to garge door @ Stn 84 770.50 770.50
79052 9/5/2002 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I Pool sanitizing chemicals 356.01
Pool sanitizing chemicals 273.36 629.37
79053 9/5/2002 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD instructor earnings 392.00 392.00
79054 9/5/2002 004007 J L WINGERT COMPANY CRC pool buck-up pool pump 1,003.17 1,003.17
79055 9/5/2002 005351 JACKSON, CELESTE Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons 25.00 25.00
79056 9/5/2002 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS Network equipment mntc/repairs 528.52 528.52
79057 9/5/2002 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE INC EE recruitment ads:Sr Planner/Prop A 128.80 128.80
79058 9/5/2002 005341 KELLERHALS,TERESA Refund: Security Deposit 100.00 100.00
79059 9/5/2002 003986 KEVIN COZAD & ASSOCIATES I Design Svcs:Pala Ad Impr Phase II 40,404.73 40,404.73
79060 9/5/2002 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT Consulting svcs:CBH review & Analys 2,510.06
Consulting svcs:Welty Building rehab 318.76 2,828.82
79061 9/5/2002 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC AquatiC - Pool Mote supplies 38,98 38.98
79062 9/5/2002 000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC Misc. mnte supplies for PW Mote 337.32 337.32
79063 9/5/2002 000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TH 11 tickets to show and buffet Dutch 396.00 396.00
79064 9/5/2002 004905 LIEBERT. CASSIDY & WHITMOR Human Resource Legal svcs 5,431.34 5,431.34
79065 9/5/2002 005352 LIGHT, CINDI Refund: Parent & Me Swim Lessons 25.00 25.00
79066 9/5/2002 004087 LOWE'S Mise hardware supplies: TCSD 534.75 534.75
Pages
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6
09/05/2002 3:34:36PM City olTemecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
79067 9/5/2002 004697 LOWES HiW INC Mise hardware supplies:Fire Stn 117.09 117.09
79068 9/5/2002 003762 MAIN STREET SIGNS Var. Street Signs for PW Maint. 765.03 765.03
79069 9/5/2002 004141 MAINTEX INC C.R.C Custodial Supplies 191.51 191.51
79070 9/5/2002 002664 MAR CO INDUSTRIES INC Custodial equipment prevo maintenanc 248.09 248.09
79071 9/5/2002 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSN Jul Officiating Services 600.00 600.00
79072 9/512002 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC Skateboard Park Brochures 1,387.82 1,387.82
79073 9/512002 005239 MAYO, KRISTINA Refund:ParenVMe Swim Lessons 25.00 25.00
79074 9/5/2002 005360 MCDERMOTT, CANDY Refund:ParentlMe Swim Lessons 25.00 25.00
79075 9/5/2002 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS Office Supplies: Finance Dept. 283.07
Qty 2000 envelopes - Police 130.39
Business Cards:J. Meyer 114.86
Business Cards:Fire Dept. (Generic) 85.66
Business Cards:J. Jemegan 85.66
Letterhead Stationery:RDA 67.34
Business Cards:S. Rossini 42.63
Business Cards:J. Payne 42.83
Business Cards:G. FomlOe 42.63 695.47
79076 9/5/2002 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIP Resurface Pala Park. Tot Lot 3,050.32 3,050.32
79077 9/512002 004534 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES Aug emergency satellite phone sves 69.00 69.00
79078 9/5/2002 005355 MORA, LEONEL Refund:Toddler 8im Lessons 25.00 25.00
79079 9/5/2002 005354 MORENO, SYLVIA Refund:Level 2 Swim Lessons 25.00 25.00
79080 9/5/2002 001986 MUZAK INC Sept Music Broadcasting:Old Town 59.50 59.50
79081 9/5/2002 005361 NORTH AMERICAN V AN LINES Shipping Chrgs:Gold Fever Exhibition 229.27 229.27
79082 9/5/2002 002292 OASIS VENDING Kitchen/Coffee Supplies:Cily Hall 381.62
Kitchen/Coffee Supplies:West Wing 77.58 459.20
Pages
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
09105/2002 3:34:36PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
79083 9/5/2002 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City vehicle mainVrepair svcs 138.95 138.95
79084 9/5/2002 003762 P M X MEDICAL Paramedic Supplies for Fire 145.17 145.17
79085 9/512002 001248 PAPER DIRECT INC Invitation for 9/11 dinner. Vineyard 111.89 111.89
79086 9/5/2002 003663 PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO QtMy management meeting:7/1 8/02 1,016.49 1,016.49
79087 9/5/2002 003218 PELA Ldscp plan ck/inspect svc:R.C. media 86,00 86.00
79088 9/5/2002 000249 PETTY CASH Petty cash reimbursement 413.86
Petty cash reimbursement 290.16 704.02
79089 9/5/2002 003155 PRICE CHOPPER INC Wristbands for Aquatics 116.00 116.00
79090 9/5/2002 000981 R H F INC Repair/maint radar equipmentPolice 61.27 61.27
79091 9/5/2002 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY Jul Prgs PmtPala Rd Ph 1:PW99-11 11,682.63 11,682.63
79092 9/5/2002 000879 RADISSON HOTEL Htl:SCACEO Training:#1246VFT:1011 188.16
Htl:SCACEO Training:#1246VFT:1011 188.16 376.32
79093 9/5/2002 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING T.V. Museum electrical supplies 171.97
Old Town area electrical supplies 147.29
Var Parks electrical supplies 69.82 389.08
79094 9/5/2002 003742 REHAB FINANCIAL CORPORATI Loan Servicing for ADA Loan prgm 100.00 100.00
79095 9/5/2002 000266 RIGHTWAY Equipment rental - Paseo Park 189.05
Equipment Rental - Riverton Park 70.89
Equipment Rental - Veteran's Park 54.39 314.33
79096 9/5/2002 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT Aug 2002 K-Rat payment 2,700.00 2,700.00
79097 9/5/2002 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW ST Add', Patrol Svcs:Tem. Rodeo OS/25/0 965.96 965.96
79098 9/5/2002 001097 ROADLlNE PRODUCTS INC Misc. Parts & Supplies:PW Stencil Tru 581,35 581.35
79099 9/5/2002 005359 SAN GORGONIO GIRL SCOUT C Refund:Picnic Shelter:7/16/02 24,00 24.00
Page:;"
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
0910512002 3:34:36PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
79100 91512002 005353 SCHOSSOW-BYLAND, JAMIE Refund:Level2 Swim Lessons 25.00 25.00
79101 91512002 005358 SCHWENKMEYER, HANNAH Refund:Hawaiian Dance Teen Begin 65.00 65.00
79102 91512002 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA T.E.S. pool maintenance services 743.80 743.80
79103 91512002 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Day Camp Supplies 382.64
Day Camp Supplies 153.65
Day Camp Supplies 109.59
Supplies for 4th of July 65.31
Day Camp Supplies 22.46 733.65
79104 91512002 000722 SO CALF ASSN CODE ENF.OFF SCACEO Training:SalazarNoshall 500.00 500.00
79105 91512002 002718 SO CALIF CITY CLERKS ASSN Business Mtg:9127102:S.J.lM.B.lC.D. 90.00 80.00
79106 91512002 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Aug 2-02-502-8077 West Wing 2,225.04
Aug 2-10-331-2153 TCC 1,414.11
Aug 2-19-683-3255 Front St Ped 715.40
Aug 2-19-683-3263 Front St Ped 385.44
Aug 2-22-575-0876 Old Town Front S 283.49
Aug 2-19-538-2262 various meters 161.64
Aug 2-18-528-9980 Santiago Rd 54.61 5,239.73
79107 91512002 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTRe Pest Control Srves: CRC 90.00
Pest Control SlVes: Maint Fae. 40.00
Pest Control Srves: Tee 36.00 166.00
79108 91512002 004496 SPARKS EXHIBITS & ENVIRON~ CHILDRENS MUSUEM CONSTRUCTI 73,648.00 73,648.00
79109 91512002 004768 SPLASH DOWN ANCHORS Summer/Fait 2002 Softball Awards 3,071.83 3,071.63
79110 91512002 000293 STADIUM PIZZA Refreshments for SMART Pgrm 400.00 400.00
79111 91512002 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FUN Aug workers' cemp premium 27,200.11 27,200.11
79112 91512002 003840 STRONGS PAINTING PREP & SEAL ALL BENCHES, PLAN 5,400.00 5,400.00
79113 91512002 003599 T Y L1N INTERNATIONAL Jul/Aug Design Svcs:R.C. Bridge Wide 4,480.25 4,480.25
79114 91512002 000305 TARGET STORE Supplies for 4th of July 68.00
SUPPLIES FOR SMART PGRM- 50.58 118.58
Page:B
apChkLst
0910512002
Final Check List
City olTemecula
3:34:36PM
Page: 9
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check # Date
Description
995.00
Vendor
79115 9/5/2002 004541 TEMECULA RADIATOR/AUTO R Refund:Grading DepositLD01-107GR
79116 9/5/2002 004260 TEMECULA STAMP & GRAPHIC Office Supplies for Fire Prevention
79117 9/5/2002 004209 TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY I Public Bus Bench placement/main!.
79118 9/5/2002 000668 TIMMY 0 PRODUCTIONS INC
OJ for Summer Concert Series
79119 9/512002 003228 US BANK TRUST NATIONAL AS Trustee Admin Fees:CFD 88-12
79120 9/5/2002 004504 VAIL RANCH SELF STORAGE Sept Off-Site Storage:Records Mgmt
79121 9/5/2002 005356 VALDEZ, DARLENE Refund:Level2 Swim Lessons
79122 9/5/2002 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE Permits Plus Screen/Report Dev.:Fire
79123 9/5/2002 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
AUG XXX-1408 P.D. OLD TOWN STN
AUG XXX-9897 GENERAL USAGE
79124 9/5/2002 001890 VORTEX DOORS
Doors repairs & installation:Stn 84
79125 9/5/2002 004948 WESTCO FURNITURE SERVI
Furniture repair:Stn 84
79126 9/5/2002 003667 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR CO Inspection fee:Mercantile Bldg Retrofit
79127 9/5/2002 005357 WHiLDIN, LAURA
Refund:Level 2 Swim Lessons
79128 9/5/2002 003756 WHITE HOUSE SANITATION
Aug cleaning svcs:Butter1ield Stage
79129 9/5/2002 003607 XPECT FIRST AID
First Aid Supplies for PW Maint
City Hall First Aid Kit Supplies
Amount Paid
995.00
22.63
3,000.00
2,125.00
3,300.00
30.00
25.00
2,655.00
444.57
89.60
3,599.78
450.00
65.00
25.00
50.00
581.85
47.57
Sub total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA:
Check Total
22.63
3,000.00
2,125.00
3,300.00
30.00
25.00
2,655.00
534.17
3,599.78
450.00
65.00
25.00
50.00
629.42
471,265.76
Pagel)
apChkLst
09105/2002 3:34:36PM
Final Check List
City of Temecula
Page: 10
139 checks In this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
471,265.76
Page:lO
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC~
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Financ~ ~ GI2--
September 17, 2002
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Treasurer's Report as of July 31,2002
PREPARED BY:
Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant ~
RECOMMENDATION:
Report as of July 31, 2002.
That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio, receipts, and disbursements are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004
respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report which provides this information.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635
as of July 31,2002.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
1. City Treasurer's Report as of July 31,2002
Cash Activity for the Month of July:
Cash and Investments as of July 1, 2002
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of July 31, 2002
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of July 31,2002
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Sweep Account
(Money Market Account)
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(Retention Escrow)
Checking Account
(Parking Citations)
Trust Accounts- CFO 88-12
(Money Market Account)
Delinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFO 88-12
(Investment Agreement)
Delinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFD 88-12
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 88-12
(Investment Agreement)
Reserve Account- CFD 86-12
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accounts- CFO 96-1
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Accounts- CFD 98-1
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
(Money Market Account)
Project Account- TCSD COPs
(Money Market Account)
Project Account- TCSD COPs
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Delivery Cost Account-TCSD COPs
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accounts-RDA Refinance Bonds
(Money Market Account)
Project Account-RDA Refinance Bonds
(Money Market Account)
Project Account-RDA Refinance Bonds
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Admin Account-RDA Refinance Bonds
(Money Market Account)
Institution
CityHatt
Union Bank
Unjon Bank
(High mark U.S. Treasury)
Union Bank
State Treasurer
Bank of Sacramento
Union Bank
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
COC Funding Corp
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
CDC Funding Corp
u.s. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
State Treasurer
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
State Treasurer
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
$
$
68,363,736
3,665,704
(11,464,420)
60,765,020
Maturityl
Termination
Yield Date
nl.
nl.
0.730 %
nl.
2.714 %
nl.
nl.
1.300 %
5.430 % 9/1/2017
1.300 %
5.430 % 9/1/2017
1.300 %
1.300 %
1.300 %
1.300 %
1.300 %
2.714 %
1.300 %
1.300 %
1.300 %
2.714 %
1.300 %
(1 )-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
(2)~At July 31, 2002 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $46,068,744,600.
The City's proportionate share of that value is $63,646,552.
All investments are liquid and currently available.
The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet
budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months.
$
$
Par/Book
Balance
1,500
(338,053) (1)
556,160
2,903 (1)
63,669,542 (2)
126,366
3,777
52
500,000
369,397
1,531,469
64
744
923.595
22
2,952
2,704,551
6,437
319,632
4,965
10,346,646
25,679
60,765,020
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE:
September 17, 2002
SUBJECT:
Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
PREPARED BY:
Karen Jester, Assistant Director of Finance
RECOMMENDATION: Thatthe City Council receive and file the Financial Statements
for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002 and approve the following:
1. A budget transfer of $55,400 to City Attorney Department from CIP Admin Department;
2. A budget transfer of $7,200 to City Council Department from CIP Admin Department;
3. An estimated revenue and appropriation of $129,600 to the AB3229-COPS Fund;
4. A reduction of the estimated revenues for Grants (COPS) and an increase in operating
transfers into the General Fund in the amount of $129,600.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflectthe unaudited activity of the City for
the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2002. Attached are the Financial Statements with an analytical
review of financial activity.
The request for an additional budget transfer request for the City Attorney Department line item is
due to an increase in legal costs reiating to various litigation and development project activity. The
additional budget transfer request for the City Council Department line item is due to additional
information systems support costs. The estimated revenue and appropriation for AB3229-COPS
Fund is as a result of the grant guidelines that require a separate fund to be set up in order to
account for the grant monies. These grant funds were originally budgeted in the General Fund. The
related Police Department costs will continue to be expended in the Police Department budget with
an offsetting operating transfer in to the General Fund from the AB3229-COPS Fund.
FISCAL IMPACT: The operating budget transfer for the City Attorney and City Council budgets
is offset by budget savings in the CIP Admin Department budget. The estimated revenue and
appropriation for AB3229-COPS Funds has no net impact as these funds have previously been
budgeted in the General Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2002
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Combining Balance Sheet (Internal Service Funds) as of June 30, 2002
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings
(Internal Service Funds) for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Combining Balance Sheet (Community Facilities Districts) as of June 30,
2002
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
(Community Facilities Districts) for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
CITY OF TEMECULA
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2002 and the
Statements of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance
For The Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2002
and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes
in Retained Earnings
For The Fiscal Year Ended
June 30,2002
(Unaudited)
Prepared by the Finance Department
CITY OF TEMECULA
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~
DATE: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT: Replacement pages for attachments
Attached please find replacement pages for City Council consent calendar item #5. The originally
submitted pages reflected the amended budget figures pnorto the Council approval. Please contact
me if you need additional clarification.
R:\ROBERTSGIMEMOSIFINANCIALS63002SUPPLEMENTAL.DOC
9/16102
City ofTemecula
Combining Balance Sheet
As ofJune 30, 2002
State
General Gas Tax Transportation Dev Impact CDBG
Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 21,599,9t8 $ $ 8,591,297
Receivables 5,313,2t5 $ 38,267 22,619 274,557 131,507
Due from other funds 169,774
Advances to other funds 2,817,574
Deposits 18,463
Land held for resale 530,401
Total assets $ 30,449.345 $ 38,267 22,619 $ 8.865,854 $ 131,507
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds $ 17,433 $ 38,267 $ t3t,507
Advance from other funds
Other current liabilities 6.348,208
Deferred revenue 522,397 $ 69.97t
T otalliabilities 6,888,038 38,267 69,971 131 ,507
Fund balances:
Reserved 2,844,041
Designated $ 22,619 8.795,883
Undesignated 20,717,266
Total fund balances 23,561,307 22,619 8,795,883
Total liabilities
and fund balances $ 30,449,345 $ 38,267 22,619 $ 8,865,854 $ 131,507
City of Temecula
Combining Balance Sheet
As ofJune 30, 2002
Law Enforcement
AB 2766 Grants Measure "A" CIP
Fund Fund Fund Fund Total
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 103,904 $ t4t $ 1,776,812 $ 15,654,728 $ 47,726,800
Receivables 17,621 726 62,282 1,987,944 7,848,738
Due from other funds 169,774
Advances to other funds 2,8t 7,574
Deposits t 8,463
Land held for resale 530,40 t
Total assets $ t21,525 $ 867 $ t,839.094 $ 17,642,672 $ 59,t 11,750
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds $ t 87,207
Advance from other funds $ 1,425,000 t,425,000
Other current liabilities 1,463,521 7,8t t.729
Deferred revenue 592,368
Total liabilities 2,888,52t 10,016,304
Fund balances:
Reserved 2,844,041
Designated $ t.839,094 10,657,596
Undesignated $ 121,525 $ 867 14.754.151 35,593,809
Total fund balances 121.525 867 1.839,094 14,754,151 49,095,446
T otalliabilities
and fund balances $ 121,525 $ 867 $ 1,839.094 $ 17,642,672 $ 59,11 1,750
City of T emecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actuat
General Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Percent
Budget Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Sales tax $ t 7,670,000 $ 19,237,317 109%
Developmental services:
Planning 312,000 509,655 163% (I)
Building & safety 1,595,000 1,464,047 92%
Land development 1,218,000 2,135,359 t75% (1)
Fire 172,000 173,029 101%
Grants 374,800 207,214 55%
Motor vehicle in lieu 3,128,000 3,803,347 122% (2)
Property tax 2,072,000 2,330,54 t 112%
Property transfer tax 407,000 570,974 140% (3)
Franchise fees t,676,000 1,861,385 111%
Transient occupancy tax 1,417,000 1,424,167 101%
Reimbursements 280,000 270,997 97%
Reimbursements from TCSD 162,000 162,000 100%
Reimbursements from RDA 225,000 225,000 100%
Reimbursements from CIP 1,207,000 695,225 58% (4)
Investment interest 805,000 908,409 113%
Business licenses 205,000 230,941 113%
Vehicle code fines 363,000 483,801 133%
Miscellaneous 72,000 120,811 168% (5)
Fee Mitigation 0 150,000
Recovery of prior year expense 0 99,t66
Parking citations/impound fees 100,000 102,563 103%
Operating transfers in 1,157,000 t ,278,978 111%
Total Revenues $ 34,617,800 $ 38,444,926 111%
3
City ofTemecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
General Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual YTD
Amended YTD Activity Percent
Bud~et Activity Encumbr. + Encumbr of Bud~et
Expenditures:
City Council $ 334,060 $ 341,195 $ 341,195 102% (6)
Community Support 428,414 402,728 $ 8,000 410,728 96%
City Manager 689,537 645,778 645,778 94%
Economic Development 859,206 784,817 59,045 843,862 98%
City Clerk 746,387 720,500 720,500 97%
City Attorney 695,000 750,311 750,311 108% (7)
Finance 1,236,840 1,103,970 33,862 1,137,832 92%
Human Resources 399,932 372,119 449 372,568 93%
Planning 3,079,669 2,467,971 310,527 2,778,498 90%
Building & Safety 1,986,541 1,758,025 2,180 1,760,205 89%
Land Development 1,202,197 1,101,301 1,101,301 92%
Public Works 4,934,003 3,681,382 562,165 4,243,547 86% (8)
elP Admin 1,623,993 1,335,456 1,335,456 82%
Police 8,942,011 8,578,956 14,010 8,592,966 96%
Fire Dept 3,102,664 2,914,919 41,253 2,956,172 95%
Animal Control 115,700 81,105 81,105 70% (9)
Non-departmental 4,222,000 4,217,577 4,217,577 100%
Total Expenditures (Excluding Transfers) 34,598,154 31,258,110 1,031,491 32,289,601 93%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 19,646 7,186,816
Operating Transfers Out 5,030,000 5,030,000
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
and Operating Transfers (5,010,354) 2,156,816
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,2000 21,404,491 21,404,491
Ending Fund B!llance, June 30, 2001 $ 16,394,137 $ 23,561,307
Notes:
(I) The variance in community development revenue is due mainly to several specific plans being processed during the current fiscal year
and higher than anticipated levels of land development and building activity.
(2) The variance in motor vehicle revenues is due to greater than anticipated revenue based on per capita allocation of the state revenue pool.
(3) The variance is due to increase in sales of property during the fiscal year.
(4) The variance is crp reimbursement revenue is offset by corresponding budget savings in the CIP administration department budget.
(5) The variance in Miscellaneous revenues is due primarily to unbudgeted State Mandated Costs of$72,119 and non-receipt of budgeted police
Donations- Every 15 Minutes Program of$20,000.
(6) The variance in City Council expenditures is due to more computer allocation expense than anticipated.
(7) The variance in the City Attorney expenditures is due to higher than anticipted cost for development related projects and various litigation activity.
(8) The variance is due primarily to lower than anticipated costs being incurred for the administration ofCIP projects.
(9) The variance in Animal Control is due to expenditures are based on actual services provided and were less than anticipated.
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Gas Tax Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Totat Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Section 2t05-2107 $ 1,150,500 $ t, t 33,649 $ 1,133,649 99%
Investment interest 6,500 5,738 5,738 88%
Total Revenues 1,157,000 t, t 39,387 t, t 39,387 98%
Expenditures:
Operating transfers out 1,157,000 1,139,387 1,139,387 98%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Batance, July 1, 2001
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002 $ $
City ofTemecuta
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
State Transportation Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Investment interest $ 13,790 $ 13,790
Traffic congestion relief $ 194,600 166,529 t 66,529 86%
Total Revenues 194,600 180,319 180,319 93%
Expenditures:
Operating transfers out 489,600 556,319 556,319 114%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (295,000) (376,000)
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 398,619 398,619
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002 $ 103,6t9 $ 22,619
City ofTemecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Development Impact Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Totat Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Quimby $ 160,000 $ 364,436 $ 364,436 228%
Street improvements 998,000 855,959 855,959 86%
Traffic signals 248,000 199,773 199,773 81%
Parks 793,000 661,959 661,959 83%
Corporate facilities 252,000 224,192 224,192 89%
Fire protection 65,000 70,098 70,098 108%
Library t97,000 160,987 160,987 82%
Public facilities 4,082 4,082
Investment interest 260,829 260,829
Miscellaneous 21,708 21,708
Total Revenues 2,713,000 2,824,023 2,824,023 104%
Expenditures:
Operating transfers out 7,991,380 2,575,833 2,575,833 32% (1)
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (5,278,380) 248,190
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 8,547,693 8,547,693
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002 $ 3,269,3 t 3 $ 8,795,883
Notes:
(1) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when DIF funded projects are started and costs
are incurred.
7
City ofTemecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Community Development Block Grant
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Grant revenue
Annual
Amended YTD Totat Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
$ 754,300 $ 621,460 $ 621,460 82%
754,300 621,460 621,460 82%
Revenues:
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
Other outside services
Operating transfers out
58,000
696,300
40,000
58t,460
40,000
581,460
84%
Total Expenditures
754,300
621,460
621,460
82%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, Juty t, 2001
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002
$
$
A
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
AB 2766 Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
AB 2766
Investment interest
Annual
Amended YTD Totat Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
$ 58,000 $ 68,535 $ 68,535 118%
2,019 2,019
58,000 70,554 70,554 122%
Revenues:
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
Operating transfers out
130,000 6,000 6,000 5% (I)
130,000 6,000 6,000 5%
(72,000) 64,554
56,971 56,97t
$ (15,029) $ 121,525
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001
Ending Fund Batance, June 30, 2002
(1) The variance in transfers out is due to the timing of when AB 2766 funded project(s)
(79S Sidewalk Landscape) are started and costs are incurred.
a
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
AB 3229 COPs
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Total Revenues
AB 3229 - COPS
Investment interest
Annual
Amended YTD Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
$ $ 139,591 139,591
867 867
0 140,458 t40,458
Expenditures:
Operating transfers out
139,591
139,591
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
o
867
Beginning Fund Balance, July I, 2001
$
o
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002
$
o $
867
<n
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Measure "At!
For the Fiscat Year Ended JundO, 2002
Measure "A"
Investment interest
Annual
Amended YTD Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
$ 1,643,000 $ 1,768,963 $ 1,768,963 108% (I)
69,014 69,014
1,643,000 1,837,977 1,837,977 112%
Revenues:
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
Debt service - principal
Debt service - interest
Operating transfers out
396,t38 397,580 397,580 100%
183,344 168,021 168,021 92%
3,517,880 2,460,286 2,460,286 70% (2)
4,097,362 3,025,887 3,025,887 74%
(2,454,362) (1,187,910)
3,027,004 3,027,004
$ 572,642 $ 1,839,094
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,2001
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002
Notes:
(1) The variance in Measure "A" revenue is due to higher than anticipated per capita growth in Temecula,
as well as strong retail sales activity county-wide.
(2) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when Measure "A" funded projects are
started and costs are incurred.
"
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Batance - Budget and Actual
Capital Improvement Projects Fund
For the Fiscat Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues: (1)
Operating transfers in $ 20,112,840 $ 11,679,898 $ 11,679,898 58%
Grants 1,176,200 1,074,738 1,074,738 9t%
Reimbursements 6,258,850 t,203,11O t,203,11O 19%
Investment interest 248,472 248,472
Article 3 (SB 821) 216,750 38,843 38,843 18%
Total Revenues 27,764,640 14,245,061 14,245,061 51%
Expenditures: (t)
Murrieta creek bridge/Overland ext 602 2tl,426 29,231 29,250 58,481 28%
Pala Rd Interim improvements 603 4,554 4,429 4,429 97%
Overland overcrossing 604 74,328 t,OOO 1,000 1%
Pauba Rd Improvements II 606 32,044 25,37t 7,Ot6 32,387 101%
Intersection monitoring system 607 868,242 (539) 21,568 21,029 2%
Winchester Rd widening 608 1,960,9tO 22,182 22,t82 1%
Rancho Ca Rd widelY nez Rd 6tl 322,866 6,806 6,806 2%
Emergency generator 612 195,000 145,589 145,589 75%
Traffic signals ButterfieldlRancho Ca 627 169,518 89,732 89,732 53%
Pata Rd. bridge 631 383,426 72,898 127,413 200,3t 1 52%
Diaz realignment 632 933,447 88,667 2,409 91,076 10%
Pavement management 655 2,53 t ,868 1,558,727 652,514 2,211,241 87%
Jefferson pavement improvement 656 466,619 361,559 361,559 77%
t t 5/79S interchange (ultimate) 662 533,203 3,240 19,828 23,068 4%
Pala Road improvements 668 2,610,316 600,067 385,4 tl 985,478 38%
Ftashing beacons 2000 670 20,000
Diaz road extension at Date street 684 168,686 54,429 tl4,257 168,686 100%
I I5/Winchester Road ramp improvemell1 697 69,116 68,316 68,316 99%
Date street/Cherry Overpass 704 1,186,059 4,687 4,687 0%
I 15/Santiago interchange 705 8,601 1,208 7,393 8,601 100%
Margarita improvements Pio Pico/79S 706 1,164,987 t,094,855 54,327 t,149,182 99%
Murrieta creek interim.Nia Montezuma 707 35,180 28,687 28,687 82%
Murrieta creek bridge widening R.C. 710 678,409 191,332 86,279 277,611 41%
Traffic signal equipment installation 712 210,000 10,014 IO,Ot4 5%
Traffic signals MargaritalDePortola 713 2,238 2,947 2,947 t32%
Traffic signals Margarita/Stonewood 714 149,426 135,444 135,444 91%
Woodside landscaping 7t7 78,292 78,292 78,292 100%
Fiber optic conduits 718 tl8,800 tl8,000 tl8,000 99%
Date/Cherry Street S.B. offramp 719 1,232,064 55,613 55,613 5%
1-15 onramp widening @ Winchester 720 960 960 960 100%
Margarita/Winchester intersection imp. 721 33,862 2,799 2,799 8%
Bridge Barrier Rail Replacement 722 190,000 31,t68 23,895 55,063 29%
Butterfield Stage Rd Ext 723 130,000
Date/Cherry Ext Diaz-Jefferson 724 1,820,000
Date/Cherry MHS to Margarita 725 5,372,000
Date/Cherry t-15 Off-ramp 726 1,000,000 546 546 0%
John Warner/Santiago Rd 727 220,000 4,903 60,940 65,843 30%
Signal Diaz @ Winchester 728 168,000 130,722 130,722 78%
Winch/79S Landscaping 729 100,000
Ynez Road Median 730 170,000 45,685 45,685 27%
(continued)
12
City ofTemecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Capital Improvement Projects Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annuat
Amended YTD Totat Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Tax Defaulted Properties 731 103,toO
Maint Fac Parking Lot 732 245,000 6,853 6,853 3%
Fire Station Wolf Creek 733 229,230 tl9,096 57,983 177,079 77%
79S SidewalklLandscape 734 260,000 5,826 5,826 2%
Murrieta Creek Improvement 735 150,000 125,000 125,000 83%
Rainbow Canyon Sidewatk 736 53,750 2,04t 2,041 4%
Pedestrian BridgelHwy 79N 738 400,000 2t,867 3,749 25,6t6 6%
Vail Rch Interim Fire Station 739 250,000 245,856 1,000 246,856 99%
Startight Ridge sidewalk 141 167,839 54,580 54,580 33%
Murrieta Creek multi-purpose trail 142 200,000 7,497 37,300 44,797 22%
Maintenance facility modification 158 859,932 856,479 856,479 toO%
Maintenance facility parking lot 161
Senior center expansion 163 614,068 608,596 1,142,699 1,751,295 285%
Children's museum 165 2,259,497 457,478 457,478 20%
Civic center t66
Community theater t67 445,621 239,288 167,375 406,663 91%
Calle Aragon park drainage t69
Chaparral HS swimming pool 170 2,876,677 2,831,492 18,292 2,849,784 99%
Desiltation pond 171 5,040 3,285 1,800 5,085 to1%
Margarita community park fencing 172
Sports complex 173 5,845,027 25,076 21,623 46,699 1%
Sports park field tighting t74 33,9tO
Sports park parking lot rehabilitation 175
Trails master plan 176 18,02t t5,74t 15,741 87%
Chaparrat HS Stadium track 177
Sports park culvert design 178 11,339 10,672 10,672 94%
Play Structure Retrofit 179 50,000 15,669 25,535 41,204 82%
RC Sports Park ADA Access t80 79,500 379 379 0%
Schoot Site ADA Improve. t81 500 490 490 98%
Vail Ranch Add Amenities t82 300,000 20,062 7,443 27,505 9%
City Hall Complex 199-166 75,000
City halt improvements 199-808 791
Library 129 429,012 117,388 169,624 287,012 67%
Tntal Expenditures (Excluding Transfers)
41,587,301 10,673,961 3,433,239 14,107,200 34%
Revenues Qver/(Under) Expenditures
(t3,822,661) 3,571,100
Beginning Fund Balance, Juty 1, 200 t
11,183,05t t 1,183,051
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002
$ (2,639,6 to) $ 14,754,15t
Notes:
(I) The variances in CIP Fund revenues and in project expenditures are due to the timing of when the various projects
are actually started and costs are incurred.
12
Internal Service Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2002
Information Support
Insurance Vehicles Systems Services Facilities
Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 1,396,854 $ 333,836 $ 655,424 $ 2t5,2t t $ 114,048 $ 2,715,373
Receivables 44,036 1,517 7,100 1,471 2,514 56,638
Prepaid assets 126,842 126,842
Property, plant and equipment (net of
accumulated depreciation) 640,604 580,660 233,606 t,454,870
Total assets $ t,567,732 $ 975,957 $ 1,243,184 $ 450,288 $ 116,562 $ 4,353,723
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Current liabilities $ 684,520 $ 67,437 $ 74,944 $ t7,877 $ 42,420 $ 887,t98
Capital leases payable 224,411 224,4lt
Total liabilities 684,520 67,437 74,944 242,288 42,420 t,ltt,609
Fund equity:
Contributed capital 500,000 214,539 473,065 94,177 1,28t,78t
Retained earnings 383,212 693,981 695,175 t 13,823 74,142 1,960,333
T ota! fund equity 883,2t2 908,520 1,168,240 208,000 74,142 3,242, lt4
T ota! liabilities and fund equity $ 1,567,732 $ 975,957 $ 1,243,184 $ 450,288 $ lt6,562 $ 4,353,723
Please note that these balances are unaudited.
14
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings
Internal Service Funds
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Infonnation Support
Insurance Vehicles Systems Services Facilities
Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total
Revenues:
Charges for services $ 471,8t5 $ 196,248 $ 1,168,859 $ 253,375 $ 432,109 $ 2,522,406
Investment interest 41,234 5,t4t 12,408 5,414 961 65,158
Miscellaneous 3,335 1,795 304 28,821 25 34,280
Operating transfer in 333,268 333,268
Total Revenues 516,384 536,452 t,181,571 287,610 433,095 2,955,1 t 2
Expenses:
Salaries & wages 34,989 3tO,258 89,169 232,Q61 666,477
Operating expenses 468,263 3,024 410,349 85,497 202,137 l,t69,270
Interest 14,285 14,285
Depreciation 164,552 34t,897 69,673 576,t22
Total Expenses 503,252 t67,576 1,062,504 258,624 434,198 2,426,154
Net tncome (Loss) 13,132 368,876 119,067 28,986 (1,103) 528,958
Retained Earnings, Juty 1, 2001 370,080 325,105 576,108 84,837 75,245 t,43 t,375
Retained Earnings, June 30, 2002 $ 383,212 $ 693,981. $ 695, t 75 $ tl3,823 $ 74,t42 $ 1,960,333
Conununity Facilities Districts
Combining Balance Sheet
As ofJW1e 30, 200]
CFD 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 98-0] CFD 98-01
Admin Debt Debt Admin
Expense Service Service Expense
Fund Fund Fund Fund Total
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 20,479 $ 3,578,437 $ 1,566,438 4,069 $ 5,169,423
Receivables (136) 60,367 ]5,003 $ 75,234
Total assets $ 20,343 $ 3,638,804 $ 1,581,441 $ 4,069 $ 5,244,657
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Current liabilities $ 9,725 $ 3,638,804 $ ],58],44] $ 4,069 $ 5,234,039
Total liabilities 9,725 3,638,804 1,581,441 4,069 5,234,039
Fund balances:
Reserved
Designated 10,618 10,618
Total fund balances 10,618 10,618
T otalliabilities and fund balances $ 20,343 $ 3,638,804 $ 1,58],44] $ 4,069 $ 5,244,657
Please note that these balances are unaudited.
16
City ofTemecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Community Facilities Districts
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
CFD 88-t2 CFD 88.12 CFD 98-1 CFD 98-1
Admin Debt Debt Admin
Expense Service Service Expense
Fund Fund Fund Fund Total
Revenues:
Investment interest $ 707 $ 210,539 $ 76,880 $ 80 $ 288,206
Reimbursements 221 2,184 2,405
Special assessments 26,780 1,357,920 836,652 18,400 2,239,752
Total Revenues 27,708 1,570,643 913,532 t8,480 2,530,363
Expenditures:
Legal services 10,479 10,479
Sataries & Wages 500
Other outside services 42,812 t7,500 60,312
Bond Premium Expense 7,350 7,350
Debt service - principal 640,000 420,000 t ,060,000
Debt service - interest 875,897 74t,509 t,617,406
Total Expenditures 53,291 1,5t5,897 t, t 68,859 18,000 2,756,047
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (25,583) $ 54,746 $ (255,327) $ 480 $ (225,684)
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,2001 36,201
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002 $ to,6t8
17
ITEM 6
APPROVAL
CITY A HORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE iq;<
CITY MANAGER 1i / .
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
,
FROM: ~susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services
DATE: September 17, 2002
SUBJECT: Holiday Schedule for City Council Meetings
RECOMMENDATION: Direct the City Clerk to re-schedule the City Council Meeting of December
24, 2002, to December 17, 2002, and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing
requirements of the Government Code.
BACKGROUND: The second regularly scheduled City Council Meeting in Decemberfalls
on December 24, 2002, Christmas Eve. Therefore, it is suggested that this meeting be rescheduled
to December 17,2002.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact.
Agenda Reports/Holiday Schedule
ITEM 7
"
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Grant Yates, Assistant to the City Manager
DATE: September 17, 2002
SUBJECT: Purchase of High-Speed Emergency Notification System
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
1) Authorize the purchase of a City-Wide Emergency Notification System from Plant
Equipment for $42,791.25.
2) Appropriate $22,000 in the Police Department Equipment line item and increase
estimated revenue grant revenue for $22,000.
BACKGROUND: Staff has been investigating ways to more effectively communicate with
City residents during an emergency. Earlier this year, staff was introduced to new technology
that has since been implemented in many jurisdictions around the country. This system is
called the "Communicator" and is available through local vendor, Plant Equipment.
Before staff recommended purchasing this system, we also reviewed other products, but found
the Communicator to better fit our needs. In addition this purchase can be considered a sole-
source purchase as the Communicator will integrate with our existing GIS system and is the
only product that we found that allows for staff notification in an emergency.
The Communicator is a high-speed telephone based notification system that offers a very high
calling capacity for large-scale notifications as required before, during and after such events as
inclement weather, chemical releases, missing persons, and evacuations, This system works
in conjunction with the City's Geographic Information System and can be activated,from the
field, by police or fire personnel to provide information to the community about an emergency
situation,
Recently the City was successful in obtaining $22,000 in grant funding for this system through
the Riverside County Fire Department Emergency Services Division. The balance of
$20,791.25 will be funded through a Local Law Enforcement Block Grant.
FISCAL IMPACT: This new program will be funded entirely through grant funding. A total of
$22,000 will be funded by a FEMA grant and the remaining funds through a Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG). The LLEBG funds have already been appropriated in the
amount of $20,791.25. As a result, the appropriation of $22,000 is offset by the increase
estimated grant revenue.
Attachment: Agreement & Plant Equipment Quote
. R:\ADAMSA\COUNCIL\Reverse 911 staff report.doc
Proposal Date: September 9, 2002
Proposal No.: 6438
The Communicator Automatic Notification System - Upgrade
City of Temecula
Customer Information
Customer: City of Temecula
Contact:
Phone:
Fax:
E-Mail:
PEl Contact Information
Sales Representative:
Phone:
Fax:
E-Mail:
Account Exec: John Bourne
Phone: 909-719-2100
Fax: 909-296-2739
E-Mail: ibournelRl...einc.com
1 TSD
THE COMMUNICATOR™
: '>Dfisi:ljbtiaiii ~'. i();UifitielicJi :UlMijYi ;;. ;i;Uj.;;I:QUW,
The Communicator includes:
Phone Line Expansion (8 Ports) $ 35.500.00 EA $ 35,500.00
Networking for CommunicatorlGeoNotify
with one(1) Seat License
Commercial Data
(maps, addresses & phone numbers)
OneCall Offsite Back-Up with FTP Access
(3,000 calls included)
Multi-Form Chassis Hardware Package
Pre-Installation Set-up
One Year 24/7 Support & Warranty
0; Part No.
The Communicator System Subtotal
$
35,500.00
Plant Equipment. Inc. - P.O. Box 9007 - 42505 Rio Nedo, Temecula, CA 92589. Tel: 909.676.4802 - Fax: 909.676.9651
Visit OUf Web Site at http://www.peinc.com
Page 1 of 2
The Communicator Automatic Notification System - Upgrade
City of Temecula
Services
Q F?aI'tN6, "'QiiifcnotiifilJ '/:lil"it'F?ncii' " ,J'J'/:lIMJ'W ;;, "wmofilm
Services
1 809800-17101 On-Site InstallationfTraining (3 days) $ 4,500 $ 4,500.00
1 T5D One Year 24/7 Support & Warranty
Services and Training Subtotal $ 4,500.00
Quote Summa
The Communicator System
Services
subtotal
CA Sales Tax
$35.500.00
89%
11%
Additional Comments
Quote is valid for 45 days from Proposal Date.
Lead Time: 6 - 8 Weeks ARO.
Quote includes an 8 line Communicator System. Installation and training for 3 days has been included.
24/7 manufactuer support and warranty has been included through year one.
A block of back up calls not to exceed 3000 per year has been included. Call volumes that exceed 3000 will be charged
at .25c per call.
Plant Equipment, Inc.. P.O. Box 9007 - 42505 Rio Nedo, Temecula, CA 92589 - Tel: 909.676.4802 - Fax: 909.676.9651
Visit our Web Site at http://www.peinc.com
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT
COMMUNICATOR AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION SYSTEM-UPGRADE
This Purchase and Installation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered
into as of September 17, 2002 by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal
corporation, and Plant Equipment, Inc. ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants
and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purchase and Sale of EauiDment. On and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to design,
manufacture, sell, deliver and install to the City modular and private office furniture for City Hall
as more particularly described in Exhibit A Description of Equipment & Exhibit C Vendor
proposal, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter
"Equipment").
2. Purchase/Installation Price. The Purchase and Installation price which
City agrees to pay to Vendor for the equipment, training, 1-year warranty and installation of the
Communicator Automatic Notification System, is Forty-Two Thousand, Seven Hundred and
Ninety One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($42,791.25) The Purchase price is final and
shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: 50% deposit at the
time of approved contract with balance d/:le upon completion of project as set forth in Exhibit B.
3. Chanae Orders. All change orders shall be approved by the City
Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by
written order, changes or additions to the Work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council. A 10% contingency in the amount" of $4,279.00 is available if
change orders should take place above the purchase price amount.
4. ScoDe of Work. Vendor shall design, manufacture, and install the
equipment as described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit A and Exhibit C ("Work"). Vendor shall provide and furnish all design sketches, labor,
materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment and all utility and transportation services
required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the
Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The
Work shall be completed within the time set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not
commence the Work until such time as directed by the City.
5. ReDresentations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the
following representations and warranties to City:
a. Authoritv and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal
capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this
Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in
connection with Vendor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this
Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof.
The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by
Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor
and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable
against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms.
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
1
b. Title and Operatina Condition. Vendor has good and marketable
title to all of the Equipment designed, manufactured and installed. All of the
Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or
assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and
clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims,
covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or
granted by City. All of the Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of
any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions,
representations and warranties set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is
aware the City is purchasing the Equipment for use as an emergency back-up
generator for electrical power to City Hall and that City is relying on Vendor's
warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for
which the Equipment is normally used.
c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made
by Vendor in this Agreement contain, or will contain any untrue statement of a
material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
6. Performance. Vendor shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Vendor
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement. Installation of the Equipment shall be performed by a licensed
contractor.
7. City Approval. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services
shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its
authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year
from date of acceptance. The City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery.
Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the
determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR
RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City.
Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt.
8. Time of Deliverv.
be completed by November 30, 2002.
The date and time of delivery of the furniture shall
9. Place of Deliverv. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location:
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. On-site installation date and time must be
pre-approved by City.
10. Reiection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City
pursuant to Section 6, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment and
Installation, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment and Installation, or (3) accept any
commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder or the Installation. The
exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any
rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by
the City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
2
expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full
for such expenses.
11. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance.
Vendor expressly agrees that the design, manufacture and installation of Equipment tendered
and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the
original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part
thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute
performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender
by Vendor.
12. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers. officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or
from the Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
13. Contract Documents.
a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by
this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: (1) Vendor quotes,
dated June 28, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents
conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the
terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling.
c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the
quote provided by the Vendor and attached to this Agreement shall prevail.
14. Default of Vendor.
a. The Vendor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event the Vendor is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Vendor for any
work performed after the date of defauit and can terminate this Agreement immediately by
written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's control, and without fault or
negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines the Vendor is in default in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Vendor
with written notice of the default. The Vendor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of
said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the
Vendor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without
further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in
equity or under this Agreement.
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
3
15. Liabilitv Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this projecVlocation or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
4
occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceotability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coveraae. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to
be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the
City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer
may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
16. Prevailina Waaes. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the
Labor Code of the State of California, the District Council has obtained the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for
each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk.
Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a
copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5,
1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code,
Contractor shall forfeit to the District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or
portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated
prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under
him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
5
17. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive
the execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement.
18. leqal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at
all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply
with this section.
19. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula
shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the
Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year
thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrrants and represents to the City that no officer or
employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual,
financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's
sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such
interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
20. Independent Contractor. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to
the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this
Agreement on behalf of the Vendor shall at all times be under the Vendor's exclusive direction
and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have
controi over the conduct of the Vendor or any of the Vendor's officers, employees, agents or
volunteers except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall not at any time or in any manner
represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner, officers,
employees or agents of the City of Temecula. Vendor shall not incur or have the power to incur
any debt, obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind the City in any manner.
21. Assiqnment. The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City.
22. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the
other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to.
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the
United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate
by Notice:
To Vendor at:
Plant Equipment, Inc.
PO Box 9007
42505 Rio Nedo
Temecula, CA 92589
To City at:
City of Temecula
Attn: City Manager
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
6
23. Governina Law. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the
iaws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior or federal district court
with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
24. Entire Aareement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein
and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems
material.
25. Authoritv To Execute This Aareement. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind
Vendor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
R:\vollmumla9reements.alllreverse911.2002
7
Vendor
Plant Equipment, Inc.
PO Box 9007
42505 Rio Nedo
Temecula, CA 92589
Phone (909) 676-4802
Fax (909) 676-9651
BY:
Signatures two (2) Corporate Officers required for corporations.
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
8
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT/SCOPE OF WORK
All work to be performed as per specifications attached hereto and incorporated herein.
. Equipment to be installed should include:
Phone Line Expansion (8 ports)
Networking for Communicator/GeoNotify with one (1) Seat License
Commercial Data
(maps, addresses & phone numbers)
OneCall Offsite Back-Up with FTP Access (3,000 calls included)
Multi-Form Chassis Hardware Package
Pre-Installation Set-Up
One Year 24/7 Support and Warranty
. On-Site InstallationfTraining (3 days)
One Year 24/7 Support and Warranty
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
9
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
Cost of Work shall not exceed $42,791.25 as quoted by the Vendor in the letters dated
September 9, 2002 attached hereto and incorporated herein.
R:\vollmumlagreements.all\reverseg11.2002
10
EXHIBIT C
VENDOR'S PROPOSAL DATED
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\reverse911.2002
11
ITEM 8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
pI0
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Howard Windsor, Fire Chief ~)::I
DATE: September 17, 2002
SUBJECT: Purchase of one (1) Fire Department Rescue Squad Vehicle
Prepared by: Howard Windsor, Fire Chief and Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Approve the purchase of the Rescue Squad Vehicle Apparatus from KME in the amount of
$108,906.16.
DISCUSSION: The City currently has two paramedic assessment squads located at stations
84 and 73. With the purchase of this vehicle the City will have a third fire rescue vehicle in full
operating capacity. This vehicle will become the front line rescue unit located at Parkview Fire
Station (Station #84). And the first vehicle purchased by the City at the inception of this program will
become the fire rescue back-up vehicle Station #84 (Medic Squad 84R) for the City.
The purchase of the fire rescue squad vehicle is being made based on the previous purchase from
KME Fire Apparatus. The bid price from the last purchase is being honored by KME Fire Apparatus
and applied to this purchase. Staff has requested several modifications to the original vehicle
specification, which has affected an overall increase of $3,070 from the previous purchase price of
the vehicle. The price increase is the result of a cab and chassis increase as well as the modification
to the original specifications to include additional 110-volt receptacles, three (3) 12-volt power
supplies, strip lighting in all compartments and a hydraulic generator. Because of a limited number
of vehicle cab and chassis types that meet this specification the model year 2002 Ford F550 cab
and chassis is the only platform that can meet the county's specification for this emergency vehicle
application.
The purchase agreement is based on an approximate 90-120-calendar day delivery from the time
KME receives the cab and chassis. The followin9 information applies to the KME "Walk Around"
light duty rescue vehicle body mounted on a 2002 Ford F550 cab and chassis:
Dealer
KME
Fire Apparatus
Vehicle/Model
F-550 Extended Cab and
Chassis (2002)
Price
$1 08,906.16 tax included
FISCAL IMPACT:
squad vehicle.
Adequate funds are available in the operating budget to purchase this rescue
Attached: City Purchase Agreement With KME Fire Apparatus
CITY OF TEMECUlA
PURCHASE AND INSTAllATION AGREEMENT
KME FIRE APPARATUS
PARAMEDIC SQUAD BODY
This Purchase and Installation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered
into as of August 27, 2002, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal
corporation, and KME Fire Apparatus ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants
and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purchase and Sale of Eauipment. On and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to
manufacture, sell and deliver to the City a KME "Walk Around" Light Duty Rescue Vehicle body
as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Paramedic Squad Specifications, attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment").
2. Purchase/Installation Price. The Purchase and Installation price which
City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment, Service and Installation is One Hundred Eight
Thousand, Nine Hundred and Six Dollars and Sixteen ($108,906.16). The Purchase price is
final and shall be paid by City to Vendor within 30 days of receipt of invoice and acceptance by
the Riverside County, City of Temecula, Fire Department.
3. Scope of Work. Vendor shall manufacture and install the equipment
as described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A
("Work"). Vendor shall provide and furnish all labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be
performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the
specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed within the time set
forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed
by the City.
4. Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the
following representations and warranties to City:
a. Authoritv and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal
capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this
Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in
connection with Vendor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this
Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof.
The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by
Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor
and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable
against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms.
b. Title and Ooeratina Condition. Vendor has good and marketable
title to all of the Equipment manufactured and installed. All of the Equipment are
free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and
City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages,
liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions
R:\Finance\Purchasing\Agrreements.AIl\KME.Rescue Squad Cab.2002 1
and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the
Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in
conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties
set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware the City is purchasing the
Equipment for use as Paramedic Squad body to City supplied Vehicle cab and
chassis and that City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Equipment is fit
for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally
used.
c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made
by Vendor in this Agreement contain or will contain any untrue statement of a
material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
5. Performance. Vendor shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Vendor
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement.
6. City Approval. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services
shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its
authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year
from date of acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery.
Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the
determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR
RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City.
Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt.
7. Time of Deliverv. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment
shall be approximately 120 days from receipt of Contract by the Vendor.
8. Place of Deliverv. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location:
Parkview Fire Station 84, 30650 Pauba Road, Temecula CA 92592
9. Reiection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City
pursuant to Section 6, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment and
Installation, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment and Installation, or (3) accept any
commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder or the Installation. The
exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any
rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by
City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that
expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full
for such expenses.
10. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance.
Vendor expressly agrees that both the Equipment and Installation tendered and the tender itself
will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the
event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to
Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or
engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor.
R:\Finance\Purchasing\Agrreements.AII\KME.Rescue Squad Cab.2002 2
11. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or
from the Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
12. Contract Documents.
a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by
this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: (1) Paramedic Squad
Specifications, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) Vendor's Proposal Sheet dated
January 10, 2002, attached hereto as Exhibit B.
b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents
conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the
terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling.
c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the
RFP and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over
the RFP and the Vendor's Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over
the Vendor's Response to the RFP.
13. Default of Vendor.
a. The Vendor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event the Vendor is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Vendor for any
work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by
written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's control, and without fault or
negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines the Vendor is in default in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Vendor
with written notice of the default. The Vendor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of
said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the
Vendor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without
further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in
equity or under this Agreement.
14. Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
- 3 -
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENTAND INSTALLATIONOl.
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option ofthe City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officiais, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
-4-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIONO 1
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceotabilitv of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to
be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the
City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer
may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
15. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive
the execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement.
16. Leaal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at
all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply
with this section.
17. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula
shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the
Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year
thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or
employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual,
financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's
sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such
interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
18. Independent Contractor. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to
the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this
Agreement on behalf of the Vendor shall at all times be under the Vendor's exclusive direction
and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have
control over the conduct of the Vendor or any of the Vendor's officers, employees, agents or
volunteers except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall not at any time or in any manner
- 5 -
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIONO!
represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner, officers,
employees or agents of the City of Temecula. Vendor shall not incur or have the power to incur
any debt, obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind the City in any manner.
19 Assianment. The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City.
20. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the
other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the
United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate
by Notice:
To Vendor at:
KME Fire Apparatus
Attn: Edward G. Shabro
5400 E. Jurupa Street
Ontario, CA 91761
To City at:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589
Attn: City Manager
- 6-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIONOl
21. Governino Law. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior or federal district court
with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
22. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein
and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems
material.
23. Authoritv To Execute This Aoreement. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind
Vendor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
-7 -
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIQNOI
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Vendor
KME Fire Apparatus
Attn: Edward G. Shabro
5400 E. Jurupa Street
Ontario, CA 91761
(909) 937-3326
By:
Title:
By:
Title:
Two Signatures Required for Corporations
- 8-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENTAND INSTALLATIONOl
EXHIBIT A
Paramedic Squad Specifications
All work is to be in accordance with the attached specifications attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
- 9-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUlPMENTAND INSTALLATIONOl
EXHIBIT B
KME Proposal Sheet
The purchase and installation is for one (1) KME "Walk Around" Light Duty Rescue Vehicle body
to be mounted per City of Temecula Fire Department specifications on KME supplied 2002,
Ford F550 cab & chassis. The cost for manufacture and installation of the body shall not exceed
One Hundred and Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Six Dollars and Sixteen Cents
($108,906.16) as per the proposal sheet attached hereto and incorporated herein.
- 10-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLATIONOl
CITY OF TEMECUlA
PURCHASE AND INSTAllATION AGREEMENT
KME FIRE APPARATUS
PARAMEDIC SQUAD BODY
This Purchase and Installation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered
into as of August 27, 2002, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal
corporation, and KME Fire Apparatus ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants
and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purchase and Sale of Eauipment. On and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to
manufacture, sell and deliver to the City a KME "Walk Around" Light Duty Rescue Vehicle body
as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Paramedic Squad Specifications, attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment").
2. Purchase/Installation Price. The Purchase and Installation price which
City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment, Service and Installation is One Hundred Eight
Thousand, Nine Hundred and Six Dollars and Sixteen ($108,906.16). The Purchase price is
final and shall be paid by City to Vendor within 30 days of receipt of invoice and acceptance by
the Riverside County, City ofTemecula, Fire Department.
3. Scope of Work. Vendor shall manufacture and install the equipment
as described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A
('Work"). Vendor shall provide and furnish all labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be
performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the
specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed within the time set
forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed
by the City.
4. Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the
following representations and warranties to City:
a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal
capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this
Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in
connection with Vendor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this
Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof.
The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by
Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor
and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable
against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms.
b. Title and Ooeratina Condition. Vendor has good and marketable
title to all of the Equipment manufactured and installed. All of the Equipment are
free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and
City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages,
liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions
R:\Finance\Purchasing\Agrreements.All\KME.Rescue Squad Cab.2002 1
and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the
Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in
conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties
set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware the City is purchasing the
Equipment for use as Paramedic Squad body to City supplied Vehicle cab and
chassis and that City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Equipment is fit
for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally
used.
c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made
by Vendor in this Agreement contain or will contain any untrue statement of a
material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
5. Performance. Vendor shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Vendor
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement.
6. City ADDroval. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services
shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its
authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year
from date of acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery.
Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the
determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR
RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City.
Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt.
7. Time of Deliverv. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment
shall be approximately 120 days from receipt of Contract by the Vendor.
8. Place of Deliverv. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location:
Parkview Fire Station 84, 30650 Pauba Road, Temecula CA 92592
9. Reiection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City
pursuant to Section 6, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment and
Installation, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment and Installation, or (3) accept any
commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder or the Installation. The
exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any
rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by
City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that
expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full
for such expenses.
10. No ReDlacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance.
Vendor expressly agrees that both the Equipment and Installation tendered and the tender itself
will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the
event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to
Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or
engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor.
R:\Finance\Purchasing\Agrreements.AII\KME.Rescuc Squad Cab.2002 2
11. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or
from the Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
12. Contract Documents.
a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by
this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: (1) Paramedic Squad
Specifications, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) Vendor's Proposal Sheet dated
January 10, 2002, attached hereto as Exhibit B.
b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents
conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the
terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling.
c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the
RFP and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over
the RFP and the Vendor's Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over
the Vendor's Response to the RFP.
13. Default of Vendor.
a. The Vendor's failure to comply with the proviSions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event the Vendor is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Vendor for any
work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by
written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's control, and without fault or
negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines the Vendor is in default in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Vendor
with written notice of the default. The Vendor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of
said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the
Vendor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without
further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in
equity or under this Agreement.
14. Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
-3-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INS! ALLA TIONOI .
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily InJury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of'the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
-4-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIONOl
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptabilitv of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coveraae. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to
be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the
City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer
may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
15. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive
the execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement.
16. Leaal ResDonsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at
all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply
with this section.
17. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula
shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the
Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year
thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or
employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual,
financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's
sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such
interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
18. IndeDendent Contractor. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to
the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this
Agreement on behalf of the Vendor shall at all times be under the Vendor's exclusive direction
and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have
control over the conduct of the Vendor or any of the Vendor's officers, employees, agents or
volunteers except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall not at any time or in any manner
- 5 -
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TION01
represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner, officers,
employees or agents of the City of Temecula. Vendor shall not incur or have the power to incur
any debt, obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind the City in any manner.
19 Assianment. The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior wrillen consent of
the City.
20. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the
other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (i1i) mailing in the
United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate
by Notice:
To Vendor at:
KME Fire Apparatus
Alln: Edward G. Shabro
5400 E. Jurupa Street
Ontario, CA 91761
To City at:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589
Alln: City Manager
-6-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIONot
21. Governina Law. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior or federal district court
with jurisdiction over the City of T emecula.
22. Entire Aareement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein
and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems
material.
23. Authority To Execute This Aareement. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind
Vendor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
-7-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIONOl
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Vendor
KME Fire Apparatus
Attn: Edward G. Shabro
5400 E. Jurupa Street
Ontario, CA 91761
(909) 937-3326
By:
Title:
By:
Title:
Two Signatures Required for Corporations
- 8 -
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIONOt
EXHIBIT A
Paramedic Squad Specifications
All work is to be in accordance with the attached specifications attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
- 9-
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLA TIONOI
EXHIBIT B
KME Proposal Sheet
The purchase and installation is for one (1) KME "Walk Around" Light Duty Rescue Vehicle body
to be mounted per City of Temecula Fire Department specifications on KME supplied 2002,
Ford F550 cab & chassis. The cost for manufacture and installation of the body shall not exceed
One Hundred and Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Six Dollars and Sixteen Cents
($108,906.16) as per the proposal sheet attached hereto and incorporated herein.
P:\AGREEMENTS\EQUIPMENT AND INST ALLATIONOl
-10 -
~~ of TEMECfl.
CJ'
FIRE
DEPARTMENT
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
PARAMEDIC/RESCUE SQUAD
SPECIFICATION: 2002-MS8-27
8/27/02
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Section 1 - General Specifications
1.1. Intent of specifications 1.5. Acceptance authority
1.2. Bid information 1.6. Delivery schedule
1.3. Other bid information 1.7. Paint
1.4. Terms of purchase 1.8. Slriping
2. Section 2 - Cab & Chassis
2.1. Inspection 2.10. Engine
2.2. Chassis and cab 2.11. Fuel system
2.3. GWVR 2.12. Coolant system
2.4. Steering system 2.13. Exhaust
2.5. Axle requirements 2.14. Transmission
2.6. Suspension requirements 2.15. Cab interior
2.7. Brakes 2.16. Exterior mirrors
2.8. Tires 2.17. Controls
2.9. Wheels 2.18. Other items required
3. Section 3 - Rescue Bodv
3.1. General tire rescue body
3.2. Compartments
3.3. Body features
3.4. Right side compartments
4. Section 4 - Electric
4.1. Emergency lighting
4.2. Upper level warning devices
4.3. lower level warning devices
4.4. Lower zone "e" rear signal master
4.5. Lower zone "A" wig wags
4.6. Audible warning devices/control heads
4.7. Apparatus communication system
4.8. Intercom system
5. Section 5 - Illustrations
5.1. Outside left
5.2. Inside left
5.3. OutBide right
5.4. Inside right
5.5. Outside rear
5.6. Inside Rear
3.5. Left side compartments
3.6. Rear/Back compartment bed area
3.7. Air bottle storage compartment
3.8. Bumper rear
4.9. 12 volt power access
4.10. Additional lighting requirements
4.11. Compartment lighting
4.12. Scene lighting
4.13. StBpli9hts
4.14. Diesel generator
4.15. Power switch
08/27/02
.
Section 1.
General Specifications
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
PARAMEDIC/RESCUE SQUAD CONVENTIONAL DRIVE
08/27/02
1_1 Intent of Soecifications
1.1.1 These specifications are intended to describe type, size, and quality of apparatus
desired. Bids will be considered on equipment complying substantially with these
specifications, provided each deviation is stated and the substitution is described,
including technical data, when applicable, in a letter attached to the bid. Each
and every exception must be clearly stated on previous page opposite each
specification where an exception is made, lengthy detail or technical data
requiring more space to explain must be easily identifiable and referred
back to the specification page and line number. Riverside County Fire
Department as the authorizing agency for the City of Temecula Fire Services
reserves the right to accept or reject any substitutions or exceptions to these
specifications. Price will not wholly detennine award. Efficiency, delivery date,
reliabiltty. construction details, and manufacturing abiltty will be considered in
determining which builder shall fumish the proposed apparatus.
1.1.2 Details of construction and materials not otherwise specified are lefl to the
discretion of the manufacturer. The manufacturer shall be solely responsible for
the design and construction of all features. The manufacturer must keep in mind
the fire department plans to utilize the rescue body on a second chassis. The
Fire Department will require that the manufacturer design this rescue body to last
a minimum of 10 years@ 30,000 miles a year.
1.2 Bid Information
1.2.1 Sealed proposals are desired from reputable domestic manufacturers of motor
fire apparatus equipment in accordance with these specifications. When
submitting bids, manufacturers are required to report each and every ttem of their
specifications, which does not comply with these specifications.
1.2.2 Bidders may not take exception to items in these specifications where the term
"No Exceptions" is entered. Exceptions may result in rejection of the bid.
1.2.3 Each builder shall fumish satisfactory evidence of their ability to construct the
apparatus specified and shall state the location of the factory where apparatus is
to be built. They shall also show that they are in a position to render prompt
service.
1.3 Other Bid Information
1.3.1 Each bid shall be accompanied by two (2) sets of builder's proposals consisting
of a detailed description of the apparatus.
1.3.2 Should a question arise, apparatus fumished under any contract, which may be
entered into, as a result of this bid shall confonn to these specifications. except
as provided below:
1.3.2.1
Exceptions to specified requirements which are not clearly indicated as
"Exception" on this specification by the builder as required (and if the Fire
Department has not approved said exceptions in writing) may be cause
for rejection. In any case, the final contract issued pursuant to the
bidding process shall prevail over these specifications and the builder's
proposal.
08127/02
1.3.2.2
Builders will utilize this document in their response. Indicate opposite
each item of these specs where the item offered differs from the item
requested.
Builder's proposal shall indicate size, type, model, and make of all
component parts and equipment. It is the intent of the builder's proposal
to cover the furnishing and delivery to the purchaser of complete
apparatus equipped as hereinafter specified.
The complete vehicle shall comply in every respect with the latest
editions of the Vehicle Administrative Codes of the State of California,
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety standards, and Provisions of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act.
1.3.2.3
1.3.2.4
1.4 Terms of Purchase
1.4.1 A sales slip and weight slip showing front axle, rear axle, and total vehicle weight
shall accompany the apparatus when delivered. Dealer's report of sale shall be
attached to the windshield of the vehicle.
1.4.2 A Califomia Highway Patrol Motor Vehicle Safety Inspection Report will also
accompany the vehicle upon delivery, which will declare no safety or weight
violations.
1.4.3 All contacts concerning any proposed deviations from these specifications after
award must be made to the Fire Department Apparatus Design Officer.
1.4.4 Notification oftest and delivery of apparatus shall be made with the Fire
Department Apparatus Design Officer.
1.4.5 The apparatus shall not be stored on any property of the Fire Department prior to
final acceptance.
1.4.6 No repairs, additions, or alterations shall be perfonned on the apparatus while on
Fire Department property prior to final acceptance of the apparatus.
1.5 Acceptance Authority
1.5.1 The Fire Chief delegate's fonnal acceptance authority, to the Fire Department
Apparatus Design Officer named in the request for proposal.
1.6 Delivery Schedule
1.6.1 The builder shall state the number of calendar days required for delivery of the
completed apparatus after receipt of order, and specify a calendar date for
delivery.
1.6.2 Delivery schedule shall be provided to the Fire Department on receipt of order.
Schedule will allow for no more than four vehicles arriving during any calendar
week. This schedule will be used as the basis for detennining specified delivery
date, and in the application of LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, should the need arise.
08127/02
1.6.3 Delays in delivery will severely impact the operation of the fire department.
Should delivery not be completed by the promised date, liquidated damages will
be applied against the amount owed for the apparatus to the builder. An amount
of one hundred and fifty ($150) dollars per calendar day for each and every day
of delay for each unit, will be established as liquidated damage to the fire
department. And not as a penalty or forfeiture for the breach of agreement to
complete delivery by the specified date on the purchase order. Liquidated
damages may be applied for a maximum of ninety (90) days. After a delay in
deiivery of ninety (90) days, the fire department reserves the right to cancel the
order and invoke its right under the PERFORMANCE BOND.
1.6.4 The provisions of liquidated damages will apply in cases where delivery of non-
acceptable apparatus is made, where replacement or repair is not made prior to
the promised delivery date.
1.6.5 Should the builder be obstructed or delayed in the work required hereunder by
changes in the work, or by an act, default, or omission of the fire department, or
by strike, fire, or act of God, or due to Federal Govemment restrictions due to
defense or war, then the lime for completion shall be extended as agreed to by
the builder and the fire department. Should there be insufficient time to grant an
extension prior to the completion date, the fire department may upon acceptance.
waive accrued liquidated damages after hearing evidence as to the reasons for
such delay, and making a finding as to the cause of same.
1.7 PaintinQ
1.7.1 The Dupont Chroma I system or equivalent will be utilized.
1.7.2 A monotone red with a clear-coat finish similar to Ford paint chip F1 shall be
utilized.
1.7.3 All exposed welds will be ground smooth for final finishing of areas to be painted
and primer surfacer applied for leveling of small imperfections and topcoat
sealing.
1.7.4 The underside areas of the complete rescue body will be painted with an
undercoat material prior to the installation of the body on the chassis.
1.7.5 The cab and body will be finish sanded and prepared for final paint. Upon
completion of final preparation the apparatus will be painted utilizing the highest
quality. state of the art, low V.O.C., polyurethane base paint. Finish paint will be
applied in multiple coats to ensure proper paint coverage with high gloss finish.
The finish will be warranted against defects for a period of not less than five (5)
years, including such defects as fading, cracking, peeling, or corrosion.
1.7.6 The fire-body compartments will be sprayed utilizing polyurethane coating in
graphite gray pigment. Rhino Lining or equivalent. No wires, tubes, or hoses will
be painted.
1.7.7 One (1) pint of red exterior color paint with matching batch color, for touch-up
purposes will be supplied when the apparatus is delivered to the end user.
1.8 StripinQ
1.8.1 The lettering and striping will be computer generated, 3M "Scotch-Cal" non-
reflective gold metallic acrylic vinyl applique with 1/8" black border. Font will be
Optima Semi-Bold
08/27102
1.8.2 Computer generated lettering and striping configuration have been developed to
ensure symmetrical layout design and durability, which exceeds current hand
applied gold leaf standards and provides economical replacement costs.
1.8.3 A white four- (4) inch Scotch lite adhesive reflective tape will be applied on the
vehicle that meets NFPA requirements. Must match existing Riverside County
Fire Department policy. Photographs and specifications will be provided to the
contractor upon request.
08127/02
Section 2.
Cab & Chassis
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
PARAMEDIC/RESCUE SQUAD CONVENTIONAL DRIVE
08127/02
2.1 Inspection
2.1.1 Fire officials shall inspect the apparatus at mid-construction prior to installation of
fire body to the chassis and upon completion of apparatus. Vendors to supply
drawing for approval by fire department before beginning manufacturing of body
(NO EXCEPTIONS).
2.2 Chassis and Cab
2.2.1 Our need is for a domestically produced fully enclosed commercial cab and
chassis powered as specified, similar to a Ford F550 Super Cab or equal.
2.2.2 A heavy-duty cab and chassis with a 60 inch rear of cab to rear axle length.
2.2.3 The chassis shall be 162" wheelbase; super-cab or equal. capable of carrying
four firefighters fully clothed in fire fighting protective equipment.
2.2.4 The overall bumper to bumper length shall be approximately 260" including push
bumper.
2.2.5 The overall top of cab to ground shall be approximately 90" including light bar
and excluding antenna.
2.2.6 The vender will provide a drawing with the angle of departure and approach for
pre-construction evaluation.
2.3 GVWR
2.3.1 GVWR will,be a minimum of 16,000 pounds with a minimum payload of 7,000
pounds.
2.4 SteerinQ System
2.4.1 Will be equipped with power steering.
2.5 Axle Requirements
2.5.1 Front axle will have a weight rating of 5.500 pounds minimum.
2.5.2 Rear axle will have a weight rating of 10.500 pounds minimum and shall have an
axle width no greater than 94 inches and no less than 90 inches. Rear axle ratio
shall be 4;30 to 5:13 (4;88 PREFERRED)
2.5.3 Rear axle clearance shall be approximately 8".
2.5.4 Rear axle shall be of the limited slip type.
2.6 Suspension Requirements
2.6.1 Two (2) double acting shock absorbers per axle will be supplied; capable of
dampening the shock of the load carried.
2.6.2 Front and rear axle will be equipped with leaf type springs; spring capacity will
exceed the capacity of the rear axle.
OSn7102
2.6.3 Front axle will be equipped with a stabilizer bar.
2.7 Brakes
2.7.1 All wheel power discs, systems will comply with FMVSS 121.
2.7.2 All wheel Anti-lock brakes shall be supplied.
2.8 Tires
2.8.1 Seven (7) tires, with all season tread, will be supplied with a capacity capable of
carrying a load equal to or greater than axle weight rating or as required by the
manufacturers.
2.8.2 Spare tire to be mounted in under fire-body carriage. (If possible)
2.9 Wheels
2.9.1 Seven (7), wheels will be provided. They will be rated equal to or greater than
axle weight rating. Wheels will be steel and painted to match the apparatus
(except spare) utilizing the same preparation process established for the fire
body.
2.9.2 Chrome lug nuts and axle covers will be provided to enhance the overall
appearance.
2.10 EnQine
2.10.1 Shall be a Turbo-Charged diesel with a minimum of 250 hp and 505 Ib.lft torque
or greater.
2.11 Fuel System
2.11.1 Will have a minimum of 33 gallons. ("Saddle" style tanks are acceptable).
2.12 Coolant System
2.12.1 Will be equipped with a heavy duty cooling system and heavy-duty transmission
cooler.
2.13 Exhaust
2.13.1 Shall tenninate behind the right rear tire at a 30-degree angle with a chrome tip.
08127/02
2.14 Transmission
2.14.1 Heavy-duty automatic electronic 4 speed transmission with overdrive or
equivalent with PTO port capability for a hydraulically powered generator.
2.15 Cab Interior
2.15.1 Front seats will be high back captain chairs.
2.15.2 All seats will be equipped with three (3) point seatbelts.
2.15.3 Gray vinyl upholstery for the cab. Two (2) padded visors, right visor will be
equipped with vanity mirror.
2.15.4 Dual air bags shall be supplied; right side air bag will be equipped with a
passenger deactivation switch. NO EXCEPTION.
2.15.5 Factory tinted safety glass will be provided in all windows.
2.15.6 The chassis will be designed and manufactured for heavy-duty fire fighting
service, with adequate strength and capac~y for the intended load to be
sustained and the type of service required.
2.15.7 Scuff plates will be located in all high impact areas. to be discussed in pre-
construction meeting.
2.15.8 Door operated dome/courtesy light.
2.15.9 Power windows and door locks with key!ess entry will be provided.
2.16 Exterior mirrors
2.16.1 Large trailer tow mirrors that extend out from the body. Remotely operated and
heated preferred.
2.17 Controls
2.17.1 This cab is to be equipped with all controls needed to operate the vehicle.
2.17.2 Two speed electric windshield wiper with intenniltent selection and washer.
2.17.3 Dash gauges provided will include the following:
2.17.3.1
Oil Pressure
2.17 .3.2
Speedometer/Odometer
2.17 .3.3
TachometerlTrip Odometer
08/27/02
2.17.3.4
Water Temperature with Alert Light
2.17.3.5
Voltmeter
2.17.3.6
Fuel Gauge
2.17.3.7
Open Compartment with alann
2.17.4. The manufacturer will be solely responsible that vehicle-handling characteristics
are within accepted tolerances at all loads up to maximum gross axle weights.
2.17 .5. We have outlined specific chassis requirements, such as brakes, axles and
frame components. The intent of these specific components references are as
follows:
2.17.5.1. To support our logistical effort in maintaining the fire department fleet.
2.17.5.2. To eliminate components which have been unreliable or difficult to
service and repair.
2.17.5.3. To incorporate proven components in new vehicles.
2.17.6 This specification requires the vehicle manufacturer to employ industry
acceptable engineering criteria in the design of the vehicle and to certify its
compliance with all applicable standards in force at the time of manufacture.
Vehicle safety will remain the most important design criteria.
2.17.7 It will be incumbent on the builder to evaluate these specifications as to any
deviations from acceptable standards of vehicle manufacture. Should the
contractor identify any problem, They will be brough1 to the attention of the Fire
Department. No deviations from Federal motor vehicle safety standards are
intended.
2.18 Other Items Reauired
2.18.1 The vehicle shall be equipped with the following;
2.18.1.1 Ambulance prep package or equivalent which includes;
2.18.1.1.1 Auxiliary idle control
2.18.1.1.2 Dual 1 05 amp alternators or greater
2.18.1.1.3 Air conditioning
2.18.1.1.4 Passenger side airbag
2.18.2 HD Heater/Side Window Defrosters
2.18.3 Chrome Front Bumper & Front Grill
2.18.4 Fronllow hooks
08/27/02
2.18.5 Heavy-duty push bumper for the use of mounting extemal siren speakers and
waming lights. (Smittybilt Outland Sport 213310-S)
2.18.6 Bright Windshield Molding
2.18.7 AM/FM Radio With Digital Clock and Door Mounted Speakers
2.18.8 Inside Hood Release
2.18.9 Locking Glove Box
2.18.10 Map Pocket in Door Trim
2.18.11 Factory OEM chrome tubular side running boards or equivalent.
2.18.12 Dual 78 A.H. HD Batteries with cab operated on/off switch
2.18.13 A solid state back-up alann will be provided and installed at the rear of the
apparatus under the tailboard. The back-up alann will activate automatically
when the transmission is placed in reverse gear and ignition is "on".
2.18.14 Two (2) rear tow eyes will be provided and bolted directly to the chassis frame
protruding below the body at the reannost portion of the frame. Each tow eye will
be a minimum thickness of;S" and will have a 3" inch diameter hole. LIFE
SAFETY ONLY and labeled appropriately.
08/27/02
Section 3.
Rescue Body
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
PARAMEDIC/RESCUE SQUAD CONVENTIONAL DRIVE
08/2 7/02
3.1 General Fire Rescue Bodv
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.1.5
3.1.6
3.1.7
3.1.8
3.1.9
3.1.10
3.1.11
3.1.12
3.1.13
3.1.14
Rescue body shall be mounted on an appropriate wheel base cab and chassis.
The cab to axle length shall be 60".
The body shall have sufficient support from the frame, both front and rear, and at
the sides, so that, under full rated load, no body sagging will occur throughout the
useful life of the apparatus.
The body side and compartment structure will be designed and assembled to
provide maximum strength and durability under all operating conditions. Special
attention will be taken to minimize rust and corrosion on all fabricated parts and
structural members of the body.
The body design will incorporate removable panels to access spring hangers,
rear body mounts, and fuel tank-sending unit.
The body assembly will be a complete unit isolated from the cab.
No welding or cutting shall be permitted on the chassis frame. All brackets,
braces, etc. shall be boned to the frame and through the body or component part.
Boltholes shall be drilled through the web of the frame member. No drilling
through either frame flange will be permitted.
The body shall be attached to the chassis in such a manner to enable the
removal of the body from the chassis without cutting or othelWise damaging the
body.
The body will be all heliarc-welded construction for maximum strength and
integrity for the entire life of the apparatus.
All seams will be caulked prior to finish paint to ensure proper compartment seal.
All Compartment panels and body side sheets will be constructed entirely from
1/8" aluminum. Each side compartment will be both plug welded and stitch
welded to ensure proper weld penetration on all panels while avoiding the
warping caused by a full seam weld. The side compartments will be welded on a
fixture to ensure true body dimensions and squareness of all door openings. The
side compartments and body side panels are then set into a squaring fixture
where the superstructure is installed and the entire body aligned to be completely
symmetrical. The super structure is then welded to the compartment side
panels and reinforcement plates are inserted which allows the compartment
panels to become an integral component of the body support structure.
Proper reinforcing and supports will be utilized throughout all construction to
assure strength and rigidity for this type of unil. All smooth .125 aluminum
5052H 34 will have a tensile strength of 34.000 PSI and a yield strength of
31,000 PSI.
The super structure is designed to utilize 6061 extruded aluminum 3" x 1-1/2" x
.375" vertical wall thickness rectangular tubing for the main transverse cross
supports, and all cross bracing between the main supports in an all welded
configuration. Which extends the full length and width of the body to maximize
body support and structurai integrity while accommodating walkway support.
This structure rests on the chassis frame rails and is secured to the chassis
frame. An isolation barrier will be inserted between the body support structure
and the chassis frame rails to prevent dissimilar metals corrosion.
Welded construction shall not be used in the attachment of compartment hinges.
Welded fenders and compartments are acceptable, but shelving within
compartments must be adjustable other than noted.
The front face of the body side compartments including the entire fOlWard area of
the body, will be overlaid with a polished aluminum tread plate. full height
protection panel.
08/27/02
3.1.15
3.1.16
3.1.17
3.1.18
3.1.19
Sacrificial, aluminum tread plate rub rails will be mounted at tha base of the body
and will extend outwaro a minimum Of%", downward 2", and flange inward 1".
The rub rails will extend the full length of the main body and wrap around the
corners. Rub rails will be designed to boll to the body from the bottom side of the
compartment area, so as not to damage the compartment panels on initial impact
and to provide for ease of replacement.
Both compartment tops to be covered with polished aluminum tread plate and
fonned into drip rail of body.
All exterior fasteners used for holding panels or tread plate will be stainless steel.
In no case will pop rivets or self-tapping screws be used.
Fully removable, bolt-in, 1/8" aluminum fender liners, which extend into the truck
frame and have vertical splash shields, inward of the wheels will be provided.
The completely washable fender liners are designed to protect the front and rear
compartments and the main body supports from road salts, dirt accumulation and
corrosion. The rear wheel wells will be trimmed with bolt-in replaceable type.
polished extruded aluminum fenderettes.
Heavy-duty mud flaps will be securely attached at the rear of the body wheel well
liners behind the rear wheels.
3.2 Compartments
3.2.1 The compartment doors will be flush type with the outer skin fabricated from
3/16" (5052 H32) aluminum. The door skin will have a formed flange on one side
used as a hinge, mounting flange. The door skin will have reinforcing channels
welded intemally, which accommodate the inner door pan mounting. The 2"
inner pan, made from 1/8" aluminum, will be boiled to the 2" thick reinforcing
channels for accessibility to the latch mechanism and will enclose the latch and
reinforcements completely to provide a smooth and snag free inner door
configuration.
3.2.2 All horizontally hinged doors will be 1" thick in order to optimize compartment
space.
3.2.3 All compartment doors shall be hinged on their vertical edge, and where possible
on the leading edge. All doors shall be full length, stainless steel piano type with
y." minimum stainiess steel pin size and shall be securely bolted to both the
compartment and the compartment door.
3.2.4 Protection panels will be located in the rear compartments providing access to
lights and associated wiring. The covers will also serve as protective covers to
prevent inadvertent damage to lights or wiring from tools or equipment located in
the compartment.
3.2.5 Compartment doors shall have "Cleyeland dual spring' stay rods to hold door in
its open position. The stay rods shall be stainless steel. A.L. Hansen Company,
Model #5 door checks or equivalent.
3.2.6 Top hinged compartment door will be furnished with Eberhard gas shock, type
door stay anns.
3.2.7 Door latches will be Eberhard #206 automotive type mechanism or equal.
Latches will be stainless steel "0" ring style for ease of operation even with
gloves on. The blank. door in a double configuration will be provided with an
internal two-point slam latch with a squeeze type inner door opener. Dissimilar
metals insulating gaskets will be placed between the door handles and outer
door panels to prevent any electrolytic reaction between dissimilar metals to
protect paint. All doors shall be lockable and k.eyed to Riverside County Fire
Department standards. Keys will be provided at pre-construction meeting.
08/27/02
3.2.8
3.2.9
3.2.10
3.2.11
3.2.12
3.2.13
3.2.14
Compartment floors are welded to compartment walls, with door opening flanges
flanged down to provide a sweep-out design to pennit easy cleaning.
Compartments set on running boards or with a lip at bottom of door are not
acceptable.
All compartments shall be weatherproof. All shall have weather stripping and
adhesive seals on all four (4) sides of the door opening. All double doors shall
have weather stripping at the point where they join in the closed position.
Compartment shelving will consist of 3/16" brush finished aluminum, with a 2" lip
on all four (4) sides. Shelves will be vertically adjustable by mounting in heavy-
duty aluminum unistrut "CO channel tracking material. securely fastened to the
wall. Shelving must be lockable type to pennsnently secure in place and allow
full adjustment of shelves regardless of accessories utilized. There shall be two
strips per compartment wall.
Heavy-duty slide-out trays to be installed at bottom of compartments as noted
and to have Grant-slides #3320-20 (250# cap.).
All compartment floors shall have polyurethane coating applied to minimize
movement of stored equipment, Rhino Linings or equivalent.
Orip molding will be provided around the perimeter of the roof edge panels as an
integral component of the panels. A secondary extruded aluminum drip molding
will be attached to and directly over all of the compartment doors.
Machine stamped ventilating louvers will be fumished in each enclosed
compartment and will be positioned towards the rear bed compartment so that
airflow through the center of the apparatus can occur and water will not nonnally
enter the compartment.
3.3 Bodv Features
Length:
Height:
Compartment depth:
Bed Width:
Overall width:
108" long
54" high
25' deep
40' wide
90" wide
3.4 RiQht Side Compartments
3.4.1 R-1, Front Compartment- 54"H x 37"W x 25"0. (1) Heavy-duty adjustable shelf
mounted 16" from bottom frame rail.
3.4.2 R-2, Horizontal Compartment- 33"H x 44'W x 25'0 with double doors. (1)Heavy-
duty adjustable shelf center mounted. Compartment shall have a sweep out floor
and an electronically controlled locking mechanism that may be activated via
dash mounted switch.
3.4.3 R-3, Rear Vertical Compartment- 54'H x 27"W x 25"0. This compartment will
contain six heavy-duty slide out drawers (2) 8'H x 17"0 (4) 6"H x 22'0.
3.5 Left Side Compartments
3.5.1 L-1, Front Compartment - 54'H x 37'W x 25'0. (1) Heavy-duty adjustable shelf
mounted 16" from bottom frame.
3.5.2 L-2. Lower Center Compartment- 19'H x 44"W x 25'0. (1) Heavy-duty slide out
tray mounted to the bottom of compartment.
08/27/02
3.5.3 L-3, Rear Vertical Compartment- 40'H x 27W x 25'0 (2) adjustable shelves with
a single downward opening door utilizing two gas shocks capable of supporting
the door
3.5.4 L-4, Upper Center Compartment- 14"H x 71"W x 25"0 with a single door utilizing
two gas shocks capable of supporting the door at 110 degree angle.
3.6 Rear/Back Compartment Bed Area
3.6.1 B-1, Top Rear Compartment- 108"0 x 38"H x 40W
3.6.2 Double doors (barn type) with door holders. Door Holders rear compartment bed
area, must not create safety hazard to personnel, Le., pointed sharp profile.
Must provide adequate protection to ensure that rescue body and/or doors do not
cause damage to one another.
3.6.3 B-2, Bottom Rear Compartment- 88"D x 13"H x 40'W. A partition shall be
established to separate backboards from a rescue basket.
3.6.4 A two (2) section compartment cover that slides as far forward as possible and
will be hinged at the front stationary section WITh lifting cylinders for easy lifting
and to hold in the upright position regardless of weight.
3.6.5 The rear surface of the body, around the rear compartment access doors will be
overlaid with a polished aluminum tread plate, to protect the painted surfaces
around rear compartment.
3.7 Air Bottle Storage Compartments
3.7.1 A total of three (3) air bottle storage compartments (8" high x 8" wide x 25" deep)
will be inserted into the body fender area on a 5 degree, pitch. The
compartments will be located one (1) toward the front and one (1) toward the rear
of the passenger side fender well area and one (1) toward the front of the drivers
side fender well area. The lower portion of the compartment will be rubber lined
to absorb shock.
3.7.2 Each storage compartment will be equipped with a polished aluminum door.
3.8 Bumper Rear
3.8.1 10' rear bumper (step type with a 0.5' space between the body and the bumper)
to be covered with tread plate all sides. A recessed hole will be cut into the
vertical portion of the bumper to allow for mounting of the Signal Master warning
device.
08127102
Section 4.
Electrical
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
RESCUE SQUAD CONVENTIONAL DRIVE
08/27/02
4.1 EMERGENCY LIGHTING
4.1.1 Vehicle lighting, reflectors and warning equipment will comply with all Federal
Department of Transportation, California Vehicle Code lighting standards, Title
13 Sirens Article 8, Sections: 1020 through 1028, Installation Section 1029, and
Lamps Article 22, Section: 810 through 818. Whenever possible all lights shall
be LED. NO EXCEPTION. All emergency equipment shall meet or exceed
NFP A requirement and California Vehicle Code requirements.
4.1.2 All wiring will be in a fire resistive; split convoluted polypropylene loom,
adequately protected from damage due to vibration or mechanical injury. All
wiring will be neatly supported and clamped throughout the vehicle. At any point
where wire or looms must pass through metal, rubber grommets shall be
installed to protect the wire from abrasion.
4.1.3 All wiring in the fire body compartments shall be done in a manner that does not
interfere with the mounting of equipment on any surface. NO EXCEPTION.
4.1.4 ALL EMERGENCY WARNING SYSTEMS COMPONENTS WILL BE
CONTROLLED THROUGH THE SIREN CONTROL HEAD (with the exception of
the siren brake, hom/siren switch and master code 3 switch) WITHOUT THE
NEED FOR AN ADDITIONAL ROCKER SWITCH BANK ON THE DASH.
4.1.5 Strobe lighting unacceptable.
4.1.6 Relays will be used on all lighting to provide adequate current and switch
protection.
4.2 UPPER LEVEL WARNING DEVICES
4.2.1 Zone "A" (front) shall have one (1) Federal Signal 53" Vista light-bar (Model #:
X232P2XXC) mounted on the cab roof. The light-bar shall have; two (2) 120FPM
standard speed rotators. two (2) 175FPM fast-speed rotators, two (2) trapezoid
mirrors, two (2) VR intersection "sweep" lights, four (4) rear flashing halogen
lights, two (2) alley lights, two (2) CA steady burn lights, one (1) TCL and one (1)
3M Opticom emitter (Model #: 3M-792H). The light-bar will be pennanent
mounted to the cab roof.
4.2.2 Zone "C" (rear) shall have two (2) Federal Signal MODLED 3-up LED warning
lights with clear lenses (Model #: MODLED3F-RRA). Each light shall be
connected to one (1) Federal Signal solid state LED flasher (Model #: FA5).
These lights shall be flush mounted. If flush mount product not ayailable, a
surface mount light is acceptable.
4.3 LOWER LEVEL WARNING DEVICES
4.3.1 Eight (8) Federal Signal MODLED 1-up LED warning lights with clear lenses shall
be installed in the following manner:
4.3.1.1 Two (2) lights on the front of the apparatus (Zone "Ai.
08/27/02
4.3.1.2 One (1) light on each front comer point of the apparatus (Zone "B" & "0").
4.3.1.3 Two (2) lights on each rear corner points (Zone "B" & "0").
4.3.1.4 Two (2) lights on the rear of the apparatus (Zone "c').
4.3.2 Each LED warning light shall be connected to one of two (2) Federal Signal solid-
state LED flashers (Model #: FA5). These lights shall be flush mounted. If flush
mount product is not available, a surface mount light is acceptable.
4.4 LOWER ZONE "C" REAR Sianal Master
4.4.1 Signal Master Model SML8 to be flush mounted in the rear bumper of the
apparatus, in a manner that will provide protection during routine operations.
Exact location to be determined at pre-construction meeting.
4.4.2 The Signal Master shall only operate when vehicle transmission is in the park
position.
4.4.3 Once the transmission has been placed in drive the Signal Master shall
automatically go to the rear flash mode.
4.5 LOWER ZONE "A" WIG WAGS
4.5.1 Wig Wag headlights shall utilize (model #: PSE 360 HL). A switch near the siren
control head will activate an override control for night driving. Wig Wag mode
shall be automatically canceled whenever the high beams are in use.
4.6 AUDIBLE WARNING DEVICES/CONTROL HEADS
4.6.1 One (1) Federal Signal 200W electronic "Q" siren with PA microphone (Model #:
EQ2B) shall be installed and connected to two (2) 1 OOW DynaMax flush-mount
electronic siren speakers (Model #: MS100-01) mounted on push bumper of
apparatus. This system shall include all necessary options provided by Federal
Signal.
4.6.1.1 Control head will be wired to allow vehicle horn button to activate siren or
change siren from "wail to yelp" and automatically retum to "wail" within eight
(8) seconds.
4.6.2 All of the lights listed shall automatically be deactivated when the transmission is
placed in park and parking brake set:
4.6.2.1 Wig wag
4.6.2.2 Clear intersection and clear rotators mounted in the light bar including
opticom.
4.6.4. Federal Signal (Model #:SS2000SM-SC) control head. Switches for emergency
lighting shall be provided through siren control head in the following manner:
08/27/02
4.6.4.1. Left first switch: left alley light in light bar and left Fire Research scene light.
4.6.4.2. Second switch: right alley light in light bar and right Fire Research scene
light.
4.6.4.3. Third switch: rear clear work lights in light bar and rear pick-up lights.
4.6.4.4. Forth switch: intersection light in light bar ovenide/deactivation, clear rotators
in light bar ovenide/deactivation, and front wigwag ovenide/deactivation.
4.6.4.5. Siren control head position #1: rear amber's and Signal Master.
4.6.4.6. Siren control head position #2: rear amber's and rear red's, Signal Master,
red rotating lights in the light bar, front reds mounted in cab, front solid reds
and front flashing reds mounted in light bar, all side lights mounted on the
cab and rescue body, air horn officer side and EQ2B siren switches.
4.6.4.7. Siren control head position #3: rear amber's and red, Signal Master, all
rotating lights in the light bar, wig wags, intersection lights mounted in light
bar, front reds mounted in cab, front solid reds and front flashing reds
mounted in light bar, all side light mounted on the cab and rescue body, air
horn officer side and EQ2B siren switches.
4.6.4.8. The Control Head shall allow operator to select one of the alternating modes;
center out, right or left.
4.6.4.9. Must meet California Vehicle Code requirements.
4.7 APPARATUS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
4.7.1 The siren and communication equipment will be mounted into a Gamber Johnson
Epic 17 console with cup holders.
4.7.2 Riverside County Fire Department to provide all radio communication equipment.
4.7.3 The builder will be required to mount all control heads and speakers howeyerthe
builder will have Commtronix Company of Hemet, Califomia pull all wiring, mount
the antenna, along with making all of the final hook-ups and testing of the
system. Contact Commtronix@ 909-925-7539
4.8 INTERCOM SYSTEM
4.8.1 Riverside County Fire Department to provide all radio communication equipment.
4.9 12 VOLT POWER ACCESS R-2 COMPARTMENT
4.9.1 A 12-volt cigarette adapter style power supply will be supplied near the top, hinge
side corner of compartments R-1 and L 1 and front corner of compartment R-2 for
the purpose of maintaining continual power access to ALS equipment and hand
held lighting equipment.
08/27/02
4.10 ADDITIONAL LIGHTING REQUIRMENTS
4.10.1 Two (2) Federal Signal MODLED 5-up LED brake/turn/backup light assemblies,
(Model #: MODLED5F-BTTB) shall be installed (Zone "C"). Installation shall be
in accordance w~h FMVS 121 of the California Vehicle Code standards.
4.10.2 A license plate light will be provided. Area must also be provided for a California
license plate with no modification to fire body or license.
4.10.3 Clearance lights will be armored style LED; installation and placement will be
according to FMVSS 121, California Vehicle Code standards.
4.11 Compartment LiQhtinQ
4.11.1 All hinged door compartments shall have a switch mounted on the hinged side
door jam, which will turn the light on when the door is opened and off when the
door is closed. The wiring of these compartment lights shall be so arranged that
only the light for the compartment, which is opened, will turn on. Switches shall
have protective insulated cover so that tools will not ground the circuit. In
addition, the switch shall activate a 2" red flashing light located in the cab to alert
the driver that a body door is open.
4.11.2 Compartment lights will be installed in each compartment proYided; Sufficient
lighting will be provided so that entire compartment is illuminated with shelving
installed. Both florescent and strip lighting shall be used. Installation must protect
assembly from external damage and water spray.
4.12 Scene Liahts
4.12.1 Two (2) bottom raise pole Fire Research (Model #: C530) with Focus lights
(Model #: D30) 30Ow, 25 amp spot with a 22" outer pole and a 56" inner pole,
with 2" offset, will be mounted on front of rescue body. Top of pole, bottom of
light shall be mounted level with rescue body when fully retracted. Left light will
be activated by left switch in siren control head and right light by switch to the
right of the far-left switch. Relays will be used to provide adequate current and
switch protection.
4.12.2 Right and left sidelights in the light bar shall be wire with the appropriate switch to
work in conjunction with the appropriate Fire Research light.
4.13 Step Liahts
4.13.1 The apparatus shall have sufficient lights to properly illuminate the work areas,
steps, walkways and ground areas around the apparatus. Areas under the driver
and crew exit areas shall be activated automatically when the exit doors are
opened. Ground area lights shall be switched from the cab dash with the work
light switch. Strip lighting shall be used.
4.13.2 A strip lighting shall be provided to illuminate the rear step area. Step lights shall
be activated with work lights switch in cab and the transmission in park.
08/27/02
4.14 Generator
4.14.1. A PTO dliven hydraulic generator, Onan (Model CMHG 6000) shall be provided
and specific details discussed at pre-construction meeting.
4.14.2. The generator will have a remote starting system allowing operator start-up fonn
the cab of apparatus.
4.14.3. The generator will be mouhted in rear/bed compartment as far forward as
possible for weight distlibution. The front bulkhead will be louvered to allow for
adequate airflow. The floor in the front area will be of a mesh matelial open to
the frame rails below allowing for airflow from beneath the chassis. A super
structure designed to carry the weight of the generator will be integrated with the
designed super structure of the rescue body.
4.14.4. All wiling will be THHW or THW stranded conductors installed in flexible liquid
tight conduit. The installation of all 120/240 wiling will meet the current 1996
revisions of NFPA 1901 Standards. NO EXCEPTIONS.
4.14.5. Generator output will be wired from the generator compartment to a Square D
(Model #: QC816100DS) eight (8) space breaker panel box located in the upper
left side front compartment. The breaker panel will be equipped with four (4)
appropliately sized 110-vo~ 20 amp circuit breakers and one (1) main breaker
sized accordingly to the generator size.
4.14.6. All voltage conductors located inside the main breaker panel box will be
individually and pennanenUy identified. When pre-wiring for future power wiling
installations, the untenninal ends will be labeled showing function and wire size.
4.14.7. The neutral conductor of the power source will be bonded to the vehicle frame.
The neutral bonding will only occur at the power source. The grounded current
carrying conductor (neutral) will be insulated from the equipment-grounding
conductors and from the equipment enclosures and other grounded parts. The
neutral conductor will be colored white or gray. In addition to the bonding
required for the lower vo~age retum current, each body and crew compartment
enclosure will be bonded to the vehicle frame by a copper conductor, The
conductor will have a minimum amperage rating of 115% of the name plate
current rating on the power source specification label.
4.14.8. Any receptacle installed in a wet location must be a minimum of 24" above the
ground and provided with an approved wet location cover.
4.14.9. Two (2) 110-volt, 15 amp, single one (1) standard and one (1) twist receptacle
with weather proof covers will be installed on left side of the bOdy above the rear
wheels wells. One (1) 110-volt, 20 amp and one (1) 110-vo1t15 amp, single twist
receptacle will be installed on the right side of the body above the rear wheels.
4.15 Power Switch
4.15.1 A battery disconnect switch will be provided in the dlivers area of cab. This
switch will be utilized to isolate all battery power from the apparatus so as not to
allow for drainage from non-essential components during inactivity.
08127/02
4.15.2 Priority of non-essential components will be discussed at pre-construction
meeting.
4.15.3 A master diagram of all wiring pertinent to the apparatus and its function will be
provided upon delivery.
12/15/01
Section 5
Illustrations
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
PARAMEDIC/RESCUE SQUAD CONVENTIONAL DRIVE
-
w.:r
r- ...-
b
-.r
:
r-
01
....
h
f-
Z
w .
-=- :q
~
fo- '::- """
0::: :J
<:( Z
D.... OJ 0
W 0::: c
o 0 0
W>-o -
0:::00 ro
"-
_ (1 .......
LL- ]: Cf)
ill :J
~.
r:=0 S:
zCZ: "-
~::::) W 0
"1-
~G>LlJ
'--'OJ
t" - W -.J
~'- Cl-=(
WO-O
OOC?c.o F--
OJWf-O C'!
o:::~tHf-
Wa::a::f-
>CZ:f-O
a::D....OJZ
l-
. )0
w .J
:! z
~ 0'
C
C[ (!,I 0 -
'" 1..-
1oloi 0 e
C> g"
~=::li
~ 0:1
-::!:l...._
lJ..=3:=
)0 ..
~C[~g
:z: = ~..
~~_.lJ
0:11);1..1
U:) O~
w ::i ~~,
Q.I.l:"
~~~~
w$ ~_
:;'-1.0'
~~~Z
-
-.t-
r- ...
.
'='
-or
- .-....,.,..~.._,
,_""'-h.,j,,,..;,,-.,
"'P''''''''-
">;'
....,
-l ~ .
:i:i ,--
~ :r~ \~~
:5, :)
:J "TIll)
-l. ~
C'<J (J)
.
t::
.
.".
"""
~
,
'C'
.,.-
-.J
~
i--
~~,
,,'."'-.'"
,..\\,'.:....}"..
, 't - ...:,.~~':'!-<, d.i\i: _J~'\.,;':-. '" ' ,'{ ,'. ;', .' ,~.~. .
;'k,-:f
- ~
IJ':l
"':
ID
..-
~
lD
-
f..-
,...~
I
Z
W
~
f- :::J
0::
<={ "7
0... D
w c-
U :.0 0
W>-:t:: -
o::u:=> ~
t:;
-C' :::) CJ)
L.l..m::J ~ to =
~~~ ""'l"
... 0 -.:t
.... - g r-
l-' ~
- c" j.r W
'?W..l.J--.J
l) . ><i'
WO..l.JU
,..
OU::JlO
C;:;~:J)D
o::<=(:nl-
\.Uo:::Lt-
-== <i( :) '..>
0:: 0... ::.J 7'
I"-
\""1
>-
I- ..J
:z: ::
j,j"j 0
:! z:
~ 0
CI:: -
-ca: I-
Cl. ~~
~>-Q~
~gg~
LI:rn~j
Q~-
>-.- ...
~-J:Cl
:z::='IJj....
~ " ,- ~
Ot/.l:=-..J
UUIJj~
-"CV
~ CII ._ t/.I
-:E~O
~c:(lll-
1.l.IC::1Jj~
~ccL...o
C2c..cnz:
l1J
.g
Ux
~o
l.1J III
~
LD
":
~
-
r:--
(Y)
....
.~< II
~
o
.-
-
~
~
N
u:
"",
~
"
o
o 0
o
o
o
,,>
- ID
r:-- ;s:
N l1J
o
M
Il::
~,a,. l' , _'" "
I-
:z:
L.U >
:E ...J
I- :z:
c::: 0
cc C
Q. 0
L.U .-
=> ti
::!28 "-
'to
U::=lQ :$
>=0
I-CC "-
:z:=o,s
=0'=
0",_L.U
(,)v~~
L.UC~(,)
5!L.U '"
lQ:ESO
L.U~c:::1-
:>CCCCI-
I 2!2o.::!2g
J
I ~
It!
= . I
I co ~
(V) N
cD
....
:
.
in
N
3
~I
~
OJ~"I'
It!
N
~
:z
W >-
:: ~
~ ~
q: c:
Q. CI
~>- i
Ll.IQ ...
e:O '!l;
u..a:l(/)::l
>-cs=
~q:CI'"
:z=C';!
=0
Ocn.ew
UU3:~
W- q:
c3:U
SWlIlcn
~:::;O
W~...~
::=Oq:a:l~
iXQ.~~
.
=
ell
.
I Ot
""
. I
..., "" .
N .... ""
N N
... t.i.
....
""
N
rn
cD
"""1'
I.' ."
,'-,{ -:.
',..;' .'.
{'I.~'
J"" ,.
'.1< ,"
}'.,,';
.,,"
....'.v -.'
'8,: :t
~
~
rn
C')
N
...,
N
- ,
,
KME FIRE APPARATUS
By Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp.
5400 East Jurupa Street
Ontario, CA 91761
(909) 937-3326 Phone
(800) 328-1033 Toll Free
(909) 937-3945 Fax
www.kovatch.com URL
TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT
PARAMEDIC SQUAD, 2ND UNIT
I)
August 8, 2002
Below is a list of items that Temecula Fire Department deleted on the first unit.
1. Delete two tone paint on cab
2. DeletelO' attic ladder
3. Delete load manager
4. Delete standard cab switches
II)
Total credits
($431.00)
($169.00)
($200.00)
($62.00)
($862.00)
Below is a list of items provided by KME Fire Apparatus on the first unit delivered to the
Temecula Fire Department. These items were not included in the original specifications/
bid and will be an additional charge on the second unit.
1. Ford chassis price increase (KME option 2 vs. current price)
Additional $1,469.00
2. Four (4) total I IO volt receptacles located (2) each side in the wheel well area IPO
two (2) total Additional $253.00
3. KME to supply Gamber Johnson "Epic 17" center console lPOFire Department
supplied Additional $433.00
4. Three (3) totall2 volt power supply/ cigarette lighter plugs IPO one (1) total
Additional $216.00
" .....
- .
.
.
-,
5. Onan # CMHG-6000 hydraulic generator IPO Onan diesel
Additional $564.00
6. One (1) recessed light in the passenger side rear compartment door in addition to
standard lighting Additional $211.00
7. Strip lighting in all compartments IPO standard compartment lighting
Additional $786.00
TOTAL ADDITIONS. ......... ....... ........... ......... .......$3,932.00
TOTAL CREDITS....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......($862.00)
ADDITIONAL AMOUNT DUE FOR 2ND UNIT...........$3,070.00
IIn
KME Fire Apparatus supplied chassis price breakdown:
2002 Ford F-550, Super Cab, 4x2, XL T
Spare tire and wheel
Keyless Entry
Adjustible foot peddles
PTO provision for generator
$36,057.00
$251.00
$225.00
$102.00
$250.00
TOTAL
$36,885.00 {Delivered}
.
"
,
KME FIRE APPARATUS
By Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp.
5400 East Jurupa Street
Ontario, CA 91761
(909) 937-3326 Phone
(800) 328-1033 Toll Free
(909) 937-3945 Fax
www.kovatch.com URL
REVISED PROPOSAL SHEET, Option 2
DATE:
ATTN:
DEPARTMENT:
August 8, 2002
BATTALION CHIEF MIKE RITCHEY
ADDRESS:
CDF, RIVERSIDE COUNTY
30650 Paba Rd
Temecula, CA 92592
Bidder hereby proposes to manufacture and furnish to Purchaser, subject to Purchaser's
acceptance of the Bidder's proposal and the proper execution of the appropriate contract, the
following apparatus and equipment to be built in accordance with the attached specifications.
Quantity: One (1) KME "Walk Around" Light Duty Rescue Vehicle body
mounted on KME supplied 2002 Ford F550 cab and chassis per the Fire Department
specifications dated 10/24/2001 with e-mailed changes dated 07/28/2002.
ORIGINAL OPTION 2, DATED 12/1712001:
CREDITS FOR DELETED OPTIONS ON 1ST UNIT:
ADDITIONS TO ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS:
FORD CHASSIS PRICE INCREASE:
ADJUSTED SUB TOTAL:
TAX @ 7.75%:
$98,003.00
($862.00)
$2,463.00
$1.469.00
$101,073.00
$7,833.16
NEW TOTAL FOR 2ND UNIT: $108,906.16 F.O.B. TEMEC/:lLA, CA.
Delivery is to be made subject to all clauses of the attached contract, within
approximately 90-120 calendar days from receiDt of chassi'!,. This proposal is valid until
August 16, 2002.
Edward G. Shabro
Area Sales Manager
FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE
NAME
TITLE
DATE
ITEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC -
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
ty{~ William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 17, 2002
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Substitute Agreements and Bonds for Various Tracts within the Crowne Hill
Subdivision (East of Butterfield Stage Road, South of Pauba Road, and North of
De Portola Road)
PREPARED BY: W Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful Performance
and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and labor and materials for Tract
Map 23143.
2. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful Performance
and Labor and Materials Bond as security for improvements and labor and materials for Tract
Map 23143-1.
3. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond as
security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-1.
4_ ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond as
security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-5_
5. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful Performance
and Labor and Materials Bond as security for improvements and labor and materials for Tract
Map 23143-6_
6. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond as
security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-6_
7. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful Performance
and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and labor and materials for Tract
Map 23143-8.
8_ ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond as
security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-8.
R:\agdrpt\2002\09171crowne hill.sub bond & agmt
9. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful Performance
and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and labor and materials for Tract
Map 23143-10.
10. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond as
security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-10.
11. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful Performance
and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and labor and materials for Tract
Map 23143-11.
12. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond as
security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-11.
13. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful Performance
and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and labor and materials for Tract
Map 23143-F.
14. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond as
security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-F.
15. ACKNOWLEDGE that original bonds collected by the original subdivider, Crowne Meadows,
LP, will be released upon acceptance of substitute bonds by separate administrative action.
16. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: The past land owner, Crowne Meadows, LP, finalized their sale with
Greystone Homes, Inc. earlier this year and recently submitted substitute bonds and agreements. The
following lists existing bonds and agreements secured by Crowne Meadows, LP and posted by
American Motorists Insurance Company to be released:
Tract Faithful Performance Labor & Materials Monument
Number Bond No. Bond Am!. Bond No. Bond Am!. Bond No. Bond Am!.
23143 3SM98235800 $194,000 3SM98235800 $97,500 N/A N/A
23143-1 3SM91451100 $1,409,000 3SM91451100 $704,500 3SM91450900 $38,148
23143-6 3SM96425100 $1,610,000 3SM96425100 $805,000 3SM96425200 $49,250
23143-8 3SM9642550 $1,284,000 3SM9642550 $642,000 3SM9642600 $35,000
23143-10 3SM96425900 . $1,248,000 3SM96425900 $624,000 3SM96426000 $36,000
23143-11 3SM96426100 $1,191,000 3SM96426100 $595,750 3SM96426200 $37,125
23143-F 3SM96426300 $1,580,000 3SM96426300 $790,250 3SM96426300 $42,875
The original subdivider, Crowne Meadows, LP, has decided to sell the land to Greystone Homes, Inc.
Therefore, Greystone Homes, Inc. has elected to submit substitute bonds and agreements that will
replace the ones on file from the original subdivider as follows:
Greystone Homes, Inc.
40980 County Center Drive, Suite 110
Temecula, CA 92591
Attn: Bob Diehl
2
R:\agdrpt\2002\0917\crowne hill.sub bond &. agml
Accompanying the agreements are the following substitute bonds posted by St. Paul Fire and Marine
Insurance Company as follows:
Tract Faithful Performance Labor & Materials Monument
Number Bond No. Bond Amt. Bond No. Bond Amt. Bond No. Bond Amt.
23143 SV 9463 $194,000 SV 9463 $97,500 N/A N/A
23143-1 SV 9485 $1,409,000 SV 9485 $704,500 SV 9466 $38,148
23143-5 N/A N/A N/A N/A SV 9468 $5,125
23143-6 SV 9459 $1,610,000 SV 9459 $805,000 SV 9460 $49,250
23143-8 SV 9455 $1,284,000 SV 9455 $642,000 SV 9456 $35,000
23143-10 SV 9470 $1,248,000 SV 9470 $624,000 SV 9471 $36,000
23143-11 SV 9473 $1,191,000 SV 9473 $595,750 SV 9474 $37,125
23143-F SV 9476 $1,580,000 SV 9476 $790,250 SV 9457 $42,875
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
3
R:lagdrpt\2002\0917\crowne hill.sub bond & agml
\,
:r
-n-~
)j ;
r i
:~ ;
~-!-
.
" i1"~
.....,.. .
l .
I.
i
-4
I
~l
y
_.
_."""".-~Ii
~- .,
~ .
I I
.'
i!ll~ !1I1:~-a
In 'iii~1
!el! ! i! liilii i I ____
'll'I'I"'iii. __
i':. inlll III !!' ,_ _ ,tc--~~- c......, '_"
;. -~"" '~' '.
. .
- - - -1:::::::'..' L, - ~; iff
' . ...! . ,;
, " ' ~ ','C , it
. - '-n...,.. :" ,"
- '=1' . I I: '. '. . _, .
' ~ - "b~:.. r\." .:.,/ "'''''-',If
' . , . , , . ' , " ""'I"
t 1;-" r:,U '~:r:tF.: : rr~~ .~. . .: _ 1\1
' ~ '. . . '=-.:.M:' .:,] , .
~ L. . "J!.. '. ." . f,. .
~. ~" . ., pi;. """.(.,:...1 '. .
'/.-. '. ",.. '~':"11'7:, '. . C. '",
' - . , '. l~ ~, _'.., ,
l . , . "",,'" 1\\.::'\1, , . '- . t: 0,
S '/, ',' " "'.
~ ""' . " . , ..., ,
,,' ',"" .
-'
L.lIO'
l..' .
~
.,".. l .
// " . \/ ~
~
. ~ .
..I..:..L'"..l:
-.
-~-- -
~
-1'
t. '
\~
..
, 'mi'l En" .
-"'1"'" --..\ I~ ':l' . , . _'.
:::A~ ,~ ..
-a.~.
... ..... .'
: t r: ., "
. a__
. .
'. . 0/...
.
; . ~ ',' . .
' tiZl'f.
'. .- ....
~
.- l\:
,
- ,
, .
.~
7..... " '""l'lJ;'
. -=--J . ~\Fb' 0,
I . :._....
,[
...... ,
..~" ,
... -
. .
5"."' 0
.
;.1.: . . ;- .
,
. .
,. .
'....
""/
,
.CC', '
L'.~
.:Jo. .
.,
,
..."
Ii
~
,
'0 -
.
,
.
. .~'.
I
.
~ "
S1
.
. .
" .
"
. . . . . /,- .
.' ,.~.~' {/lPf:..
"'~~:'. " "'~V.'. .
,,' '~~~""k":"~~,-
' . ,,,... ........ ., .
' , "". .....
' ,'.. "'{;". . Ii:]':
. ,~" "0 . ~ .
. ',lo.~ . li""r-:.
. .:. .
,: :"t,l'';j./,.
." . ~~
rT~ ,
..yr.......;- 000
~.'
~,
'./.if; ,
..~~.
\. " ><-:'""j .
'. '--t!kJ-. .
'. '. .' ~ .
,. 'I.
:11,
~:
'/)T..'
. .
. ''If.~.
. . '
,
:!II
.
,'f'-1'~ :'
. ~r-:-
, Q~.
.'..; 'r.-: ~",:.;;,.:_.
. rr: . r;; r:;.- /... r ~ I J.i..J..L :
.. r.' - r~ ~ - -:'L :
' ,/. '. , 'J - I -, Li'
'r:: oJ pll. IJ - 1---: I T il/...
' . . oJ ~ r.- r-- iF -J ,,~
'.., 0:: J"" .i. j,t!!~
"7 .
.- . r: ~ . : . ,
' . . .,.- \,;.~- "':....~ ' .
!~.'f.'" .0..........
. .." ".
. ,
/
"
~.
,
..
II
'T/j
.
.
..
~" -=
Ijl_
-01-
I III
! II.
I wU
i !il
; I
j
t~
",
.
"z
o
.
~
r
ITEM 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 17, 2002
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Completion and Acceptance of Construction Contract for the FY2001-
2002 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. PW02-05
PREPARED BY: IJl;1 Greg Butler, Principal Engineer
~ Eric Weck, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Accept the project, FY2001-2002 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. PW02-05, as complete;
and
2. File a Notice of Completion, release the performance Bond, and accept a twelve (12) month
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and
3. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of
. Completion, if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On May 28, 2002 the City Council awarded the construction contract to
American Asphalt South, Inc. in the amount of $343,269.12 for said project and authorized the City
Manager to approve change orders that are within the 10% contingency.
This project entailed street sweeping, cleaning and sealing cracks in the pavement and then
applying a rubberized asphalt slurry over approximately 2,886,500 sq ft of the City's streets.
The contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and within the allotted time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for
this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is funded with Public Works
Routine Street Maintenance Funds, account 001-164-601-5402. The total cost of the project
including authorized contract change orders and quantity adjustments was $355,563.06.
Final fieid measured quantities resulted in a net savings of $19,457.07. Contract Change Orders 1
& 2 were approved in the amount of $31,751.01. Contract Change Order 1 involved the application
of Type II slurry on various residential streets with higher than average traffic loads in place of Type I
slurry. Contract Change Order 1 also added additional streets for slurry sealing because they were
not slurry sealed in the last project. Contract Change Order 2 involved the repainting of two
intersections and freshening up various golf cart legends along golf cart trails.
A:\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\PW02.QSNoticeofCompletion.doc
ATTACHMENT:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release
2
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\PW02-oSNoticeofCompletion.doc
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 BusinesB Park Drive
Temecula, CA 925a9-9033
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. Nature of Interest
Vendee Under Contract.
92590.
2. The full address of the City ofTemecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to American Asphalt South, Inc.: 14436
Santa Ana Ave., Fontana, CA 92337 to perform the foliowing work of improvement:
SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - FY2001-2002
Project No. PW02-05
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the
City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on September 17, 2002. That upon
said contract the Insurance Company of the West was surety for the bond given by the said company as
required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improyement was completed is in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as foliows:
Slurry Seal Program FY2001-2002, Project No. PW02-05
6. The location of said property is: Various Streets within, Temecula, California
Dated at Temecula, California, this 17th day of September, 2002
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecu'la. California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 17'h day of September, 2002.
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
R\CIP\PROJECTS\PW02\PW02-DS Slurry\COMPLETJON NOTE.doc
/'
CITY OF TEMECUI,.A, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO, PW02-05
SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - FY2001-2002
KNOW ALL PERSONS ay THESE PRESENT THAT:
BOND It 1883069-M
Premium Incl.in Perf.Bond
American Asphalt South,Inc. : 14436 Santa Ana Ave., Fontana, CA. 92337
NAMe AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S
a corporation
(ffll in Whether B Corr>oratlon. Paflner.;!Jip or iIlr:lividuaO
, hereinafter called Principal, and
Insurance Company of the West: 1575 Treat Blvd., Walnut Creek, CA. 94598
NAMe AND ADDRess OF SURCTY
hereinafter called SURETY, are held and finnly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, ________
hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of Thirty-Five Thousand, Five Hundred
Fiftv-Six DOLLARs and thirty-one CENTs
($ 35,556.31 1 in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten
(10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temeclila under the lenns of the
Contract, far the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and
severally, finn/yo by these presents.
IHE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that Whereas, the Principal entered into a
certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 28th day of May , 2002, a copy
of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PWOZ-
05, SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM _ FY2001-Z002.
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will fumish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER,
against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period;
and
WHeREAs, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on --2:!.t day
of August ,2002_ ,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS dBUGATION IS SUCH, that if Within one year
from the date of approval of the final estimate on said Job pursuant to the Contract, the work done
under the tenns of said Contract Shall disclose poor WOrkmanShip in the execution of said Work,
and the carrying out of the tenns of said Contract, or it shall appear that d~fective materials were
furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and 'Virtue, otherwise this
instrument shall be void.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and
reaSonable eXpenses and fees shall be included, inclUding reasonable attorney's fees incurred by
the City of Temecula in successfuiTy enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and
included in any JUdgment rendered. .
M.I./I>lTENANCE eONO
M-1
R~ClP\PROJeC1'S\PW02\PW02~ Sltmy\$pecs\810 speC.do<;
The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition
to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications
accompanying the same, shall in any way affect Its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby
waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the
Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications.
Signed and sealed this
23rd
day of August
.2002.
(Seal)
Insurance Company
of the W st
\
By:
By:
lJ>'Lli5 v, :f2r:hVl....-tt
(Name)
PrtP.stl'1.t9 n~
(TiUe)
By. '<f!/D/
k';';l~ <"~f'
~.
5eC('C.l-c...-'6 _
(TrtJe)
David
(Name)
attorney-in-fact
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peler M. Thorson; City Attorney
MAINTENANCE BONO
M-2
R:\CIP\?ROJECTS'PW02\PW02oll5 SlunylSpeclBlO SPEC.dcc
No. 0002037
ICW GROUP
Power or Attorney
Insurance Company or the West
The Explorer Insurance Company Independence Casualty and Surety Company
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That .Jnsunnce Company of the Wes~ a Corporation duly organized under the laW. of the State of California, The
Explorer Insurance Company, a Corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Arizona, and Independence Casualty and Surety Company, a Corpollltion
duly organized under the laws oCthe State of Texas, (collectively referred to as the "Companies), do hereby appoint
DERMOD E. HOUWELING,JAMES W. UNTIEDT, BONNIE T. ATNIP, DAVID G. HARRIS,MAUREENE. SCHMIDT
their true and lawful Attomey{s)-in-Fact with authority to date, execute, sign,. seal, and deliver on behalf oCthe Companies, fidelity and surety bonds, undertakings,
and other similar contracts of suretyship, and any related documents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Companies have caused these presents to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 16th day of January, 2001.
~~
{~
~.~
INSURANCE COMPANY OF TIlE WEST
TIlE EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY
INDEPENDENCE CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
Jolm H. Craig, Assistant Secretary
Jolm L. Hannum, Executive Vice President
State of California }
County of San Diego 58.
On January 16, 2001. before me, Nonna Porter, Notary Public, personally appeared John L. Hannum and John H. Craig, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by
their signatures on the instrument, the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
I.... NOAMAPOflTEA I
_. COMM.#1257540
",0 . _ - NO. TAAY. PU .U.C.CAllFO~NfA .g
o SAN D1~Go COUNTY (;
J' '. MyComrniS$ion EXpires i
MARCH 19.:/004
-
1~ 4fw
Norma Porter, Notary Public
RESOLUTIONS
This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed, sealed and notarized with facsimile signatures and seals under authority of the following resolutions adopted by
the respective Boards of Directors of each of the Companies;
"RESOLVED: That the President, an Executive or Senior Vice President of the Company, together with the Secretary or any Assistant
Secretary, are hereby authorized to execute Powers of Attorney appointing the person(s) named as Attomey(s)-in-Pact to date, execute, sign.
seal, and deliver on behalf of the Company, fidelity and surety bonds, undertakinBs, and other similar contracts of suretyship, and any related
documents.
RESOLVED FURTHER That the signatures of the officers makinB the appointmen~ snd the signature of any officer certifying the validity
and current status of the appointment, may be facsimile representations of those signatures; and the signature and seal of any notary, and the
seal of the Company, may be facsimile representations of those signatures and seals, and such facsimile representations shall have the same
force and effect as if manually affixed. The facsimile representations referred to herein may be affixed by stamping, printing. typing, or
pbotocopying. '
CERTIFICATE
~ the undenigned, Assistant Secretary of Insorance Company of the West, The Explorer Insorance Company, and Independence Casualty and Surety Company, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is in full foree and effect, and has not been revoked, and that the above resolutions were duly adopted by the
respective Boards of Directors of the Companies, and are now in full force.
INWlTNESSWHEREOF,Ihavesetmyhandthis 23rd day of August 2002
John H. Craig, Assistant Secretary
To verify the authenticity of this Power of Attorney you may call 1-800-877-1111 and ask for the Surety Division. Please refer to the Power of AttomeyNumber,
the above named individual(s) and details of the bond to which the power is attached. For infonnation or flling claims, plesse contact Surety Claims, ICW Group,
11455 EI Camino Real, San Diego, CA 92130-2045 or call (858) 350-2400.
CALIFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
County of
San Francisco
} ss.
State of California
On August 23,2002
Date
before me,
Maureen E. Schmidt,notary public
personally appeared
Name and Trtle 01 OIficer (e.g., "Jane Doe,Notary Public")
David G. Harris
Name(s)of Signer(s)
IQ personally known to me
o proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
--..... '"
~.............~_...._-(
MAUREEN E. SCHMIDT!:
COMM. # 1249846 Gl
NOTARY PUBLlC.CALlFORNIA
City & County of San Francisco ~
COMM. EXP. FEB. 11, 2004 l
- .,.,. ...., ...,. ...., ...., - ....,.. ....,
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed fo the within insfrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their aulhorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s). or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.j,1 '. .I
~mR.AA R, .j~
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons refying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Titie or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
o Individual
o Corporate Officer - Title(s):
o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
o Attorney-in-Fact
o Trustee
o Guardian or Conservator
o Other:
TOp of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
C 1999 National Notaly Assodel/on. 9350 [}a Solo Ave., P.O. BoK 2402' Chatsworth, CA 91313-240:2' www.natlooalnolary.org
Prod. No. 5907
Reorder:CaIlToII-Froo1-8Q0.876-6827
CALIFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of Califomia }
County 01 ~3:LY1 ~Cm.r&i(1f) ss.
On~JJbI"t ~W/~lXJa beforeme,,<i....IVLr'I L,^la..rnopj. ~}../IJ:Pubt.
personally ap~eare:" Le\..Di.s 1), "&h()eltN'm~"'~ctr;;~DS'.b~.'~ ,
Name(s)ofSlgllQr(s) J
pg,personally known to me
D proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
l.~~~\
r'- _ ~;~":~l
to be the person@ whose name@ ~
subscribed to the within instr ment and
acknowledged to me that ey xecuted
the same in hel authorized
capacily(leS), and that by' heir
signature~on the instrument the person s or
the entity upon behalf of which the person@>
acted, executed the inslrument.
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by Jaw; it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
'Tltle or Type of Document: .rJ1::Al.a}:e4jC.p ,~d - l-e.vne c u..lc. .
<hbI02-
Document Date:
Number 01 Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
.
Top of thumb here
D Individual 'i1 :t
Jll Corporate Office':7 Tltle(s): -r (\O~I'c(..e.Y)
D Partner - D limited D General
D Attomey-in-Fact
D Trustee
D Guardian or Conservator
D Other:
Signer Is Representing: Avvt.p..ll" j (laY) A:"Jf~CL.l-J- ,<},,)+h, ItJc..
5eu.p~
C 1999 National Notary AssocIatioo. 9350 De Solo Ave., P.O. Bolt 2402' Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402' www.nationalnotary.org
Prod.No.S907
Reoroer: Call Toll-Free 1-800-676-6827
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW02-0S
SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - FY2001-2002
This is to certify that Ar"eric4~ A~~ f-S, I, (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares
to the City of Temecula, under oath, that e/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor,
services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of
the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the
execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection,
construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW02..()S,
SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM. FY2001-2002, situated in the City of Temecula, State of Califomia,
more particularly described as follows:
FY2001-2002 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR. hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contract Code 37100, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of T emecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated:
~ ~{ o;Z
By:
CZ02f8J#
Signature
l.eil>i 5 D. 'Bohn-e-tf, fr<es;&€.-fl+
Print Name and Title A 5
AM -e. ri c..c.u'\ '5.p kc.-{ f-- 0 . J I tJ Co .
RElEASE
R-1
R:\CIPIPROJECTSIPW02\PW02-05 SlunylSpecs\8ID SPEC.doc
CALIFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ~U'\ ~(~dlt'\7'l
} ss.
Namlland leolOlflCer(e.g,,"Jane
.P, :B?~r1t'-tt
Name(s) 01 Signer(s)
tl( personally known to me
o proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
on~~ldlOCl~
0..
personally appeared ---.l-.ewis
before me. j
a SUSAN It. WAllNER
_ eo.,u.64ol.'I264I71
~ ,.. NoIay P\.tllIc . CaIlfanIa
z Son Bemadlno Ccx.my
~ _ _ _ _My.~~"'_~l~~1
to be the personteo) whose nametlll ~
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that@helthey executed
the same in @n;u/1I16" authorized
capacity(i&&). and that by ~,ill,oi,
signature\i) on the instrument the persontsl. or
the entity upon behalt ot which the persontsl
acted. executed the instrument.
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, n may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: ~1vr5 A..fh'dudi t / fiYlUl R elf'us <e
", II I
Document Date: ~I 0"2- Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
signer'sNarne:~;5 D. ~
.
Top 01 thumb nere
o Individual 1). .0 I
j1(corporate Officer - Title(s): _~rl.f..c, I c;<. ~ r
o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
o Attorney-in-Fact
o Trustee
o Guardian or Conservator
o Other:
Signer Is Representing: Am of',;(i ~Cu1 Aspha11-Sou* IIAJe.
C 1999 National NotalY Association. 9350 De Solo Ave., P.O. 80. 2402. Chalsworth, CA 91313-2402' _.n.alionalnotary.org
Prod. No. 5901
Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827
ITEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: ryJ)~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: September 17, 2002
SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 29639-1 , Located south of Date Street and west of Margarita
Road within the Harveston Specific Plan
PREPARED BY: ~nald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
nnie Bostre-Le, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATI. That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 29639-1 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept
the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement 3) Subdivision
Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 29639-1 is a fifty-four (54)-lot subdivision located south
of Date Street and west of Margarita Road within the Harveston Specific Plan. The tract is bordered
by the County of Riverside Tract Map Numbers. 29111,29111-1, and 28184 to the north and Tract
Map Numbers. 29286 and 21340-6 to the east.
On July 12 and August 14, 2001, the City Planning Commission and City Council, respectively,
approved the Tentative Tract Map, with the appropriate Conditions of Approval.
The Developer, Harveston, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company, by Lennar Homes of
California has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the
approved tentative tract map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies
with the approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Fees & Securities Report
3. Project Vicinity Map
4. Tract Map No. 29639-1
r:\agdrpt\2002\0423\tm26828.map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 29639-1
Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Flood Control (ADP)
Paid. This fee is due prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
Development Impact Fee
Not Paid. This fee will be collected prior to
issuance of building permits.
2
r:\agdrpt\2002\0423\tm26828.map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
C
o
E S
b 17 2002
TRA T MAP N .29639-1 DAT: eotem er ,
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ $2,778,500.00 $ $1,389,250.00
Drainage (RCFC&WCD) $ $1,565,523.60 $ $ 782,761.80
Water $ $ 649,500.00 $ $ 324,750.00
Sewer $ $ 275,500.00 $ $ 137,750.00
TOTAL $ $5,269,023.60 $ $2,634,511.80
Monumentation $ 81,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ *TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 142.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 8.00
Plan Check Fee $ 1,570.00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 4,050.00
Fees Paid to Date $ 5,707.00
Balance of Fees Due $ 0,00
*To Be Determined
3
r:\agdrpt\2002\0423\tm26828.map
V>
~
~.
~ ~ ~en; i II ~
, ."1 ~..,' 'i f II i
! g I ~~, M I'i ~I i I I
I '. ~.~ eil I II I . I. ~
i · i ..I~ .'s'! h I j I' ~
R 81~ i:e g!ft =1 Ii ' 'I: '
I' ~l' il,; d' I ~
,. !l~ ~i~ II !!! ~! h
! 1 ~ !;~g 15!:< ~i ~ :! !:! H 8 III
~ ~. ~ ~ ii~ ;il i; i, i. Ii' ! I
" ~! ~ ~i b ;:~ ~I ~I d I ~I ~; ~
;", I 8~ III ell I, II II ~ h I I
l:-l~~ m~ij:=~; ,I
_.. .. .. .. . ... ~ D
::
l's
N
~
~ ..--
~ I ~~~~
~ (J) n~g
u """' ~.i~
15 1-) ~.~.
~ CD ~~~~
~ (J) ~.~~
15 N;!I~~
! ~~~i
"- ~~~ .
~ O:~~~!
~ z .i'.
u ~.~~
<< ....-c-L
~ ~;~.;
~ .gB~
~ I- ~-~
;;~~.
l's U>,,'~
g <( ~.a~
~ 0:: ih~
=1-
d~ ~I! !
1;'"l:;L
I i~ :ip ~
~ !! l," II!
· 'i' !.' · ~
I i~~ dUh
I :Ii ~:!~ IPI
~ !:.t:S '-;1= i..
~ . " 'E ! l:g . ~
8 ~:! el . I, e i
. 8 " "13 ~
'I
g'
"
,I I,~
Ii m
.~ ~U
1!ln~!
lll~ h.
~ II" ~ I~i~
~ MI" 'Il~j
~ ~" '"
~ ~;l- i~i~
B I., ~ l..~
. ' !
,- 1';,0.
,II '" i ~'I - ,-,- '.
..i ,. . ,I .1 ,
~j' ,;1, '"1 '," ~.," <!
ii! iii Ii! IIi II! illj i!!
1,1 !.. I.. oft)! li~ I'i~ !I~
t..1!I ! 'Il ;~ b 10 _ ..
,Ei ,!I ,II <~t ,.~ 5"~ II'
~~;i Iii ;;i ill! ;I~ ;~!~ i~!
~I'! II. !I~ II,! !II ~~I~ --.
1111ll! il~ 'il: ~I; 'il! I!:
~I.' ai' .i' ;!~, ~II ~~il 1'1
, I~ '!I '!I "ll'~ h, Ii,
Il.!-~ hg I~g I!;; hi lili I~I
d il Ii;~ I:ii~ tAh tCla II!I:_l!I IS
e 6l '" '" El El €I
~ a 1.!~I;~~!~~!i~li!II!!1
, ;0000000000000000000000
I ; ;1!m~~V!I!~i~~!~!ii!
i
~ ! "Ao;l::HI;l;n!lllilR;:;RA;lI"~IIU..tll
~ 9
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~~2!!~'li5~ag~:!a~~la~~VI~;~g~~'8~!~:la~R~S~e!~in~i~a.~~~~i
:! Ilg~I~~II~ll1111~~~lllgll~l!iE!~I~gt 18:~g8:III8:IB:8:11118:1'1!8:1B:18:1
! j ! fll n ~6fi! ;!!ii 1i!5 Ie ~i! ~ a~" 5 ~E ~ ~
i f~ ~~~~~~~~~F~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~F~~~~;~;;~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~;~~~~
8zaoo&~sagtl~~=b'~8'~~~8=t~~'aA..8..8o;~!..~t~~Z~8~83AJ8~i..~;:;"R
iii'i"ii'iiiiii"'iiiiii'oi'~j'jii.'i'iii'i'!i~ii;i"j'jbi
_~"~~.~..2=~2~~~~~:A~~~;I;g&~R&R;:;RA;lI~II~lIl1i;~;;Vt~':2..tlAJRII~III
~i~
. "
; {
$
r1
s
"
w
~
. ci
.
IIi
0 ':'
z
~ :,,:
~ ~
, <ri
u ;i
"'
Cl
Z
<(
...J
00..
~~ i
ox ~
uw
Cl
>-z
'!i- ~
'2l t;j ~
iSw -
miJj~
,.
"
~.
o
ITEM 12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
FROM:
JCiry Manager/Ciry Council .
.11i 11 William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/Ciry Engineer
September 17,2002
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Tract Map Nos. 29928, 29928-1, 29928-2, and 29928-3 located within the
Harveston Specific Plan
PREPARED BY:
nald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
nnie Bostre-Le, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATI N: That the Ciry Council approve 1) Tract Map Nos. 29928, 29928-1,
29928-2, and 29928- n conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement
Agreements and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as securiry forthe
agreement 3) Subdivision Monument Agreements and accept the Monument Bonds as securiry for
the agreement.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 29928 is a forty-five (45)-lot subdivision located east of
Date Street, west of Harveston Drive and north of Lakeview Road. Tract Map No. 29928-1 is a forty-
one (41 )-Iot subdivision located south of Margarita Road, north of Harveston Drive and west of
Harveston School Road. Tract Map No. 29928-2 is a forty-six (46)-lot subdivision located south of
Margarita Road, north of. Harveston Drive and east of Date Street. Tract Map No. 29928-3 is a
thirty-six (36) lot subdivision located south of Date Street, north of Harveston Drive and west of Tract
Map No. 29928-2. All subdivisions are located in the Harveston Specific Plan.
On July 12 and August 14, 2001, the City Planning Commission and Ciry Council, respectively,
approved the Tentative Tract Maps, with the appropriate Conditions of Approval.
The Developer, Harveston, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liabiliry Company, by Lennar Homes of
California has met all of the Conditions of Approval. These final maps are in conformance with the
approved tentative tract map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies
with the approved tentative map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
\
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Fees & Securities Report for Tract Map No. 29928, 29928-1,29928-2 and 29928-3
3. Project Viciniry Map
4. Tract Map No. 29928
5. Tract Map No. 29928-1
6. Tract Map No. 29928-2
7. Tract Map No. 29928-3
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\TM29928 ALL FNL.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 29928, 29928-1, 29928-2 and 29928-3
Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Flood Control (ADP)
Paid. This fee is due prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
Development Impact Fee
Not Paid. This fee will be collected prior to
issuance of building permits.
2
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\TM29928 ALL FNL.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 29928
. eptem er ,
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 233,000 $ 116,500
Water $ 67,500 $ 33,750
Sewer $ 91,500 $ 45,750
TOTAL $ 392,000 $ 196,000
Monumentation $ 21,625
DATE S
b 17 2002
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ *TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 145.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 8.00
Plan Check Fee $ 1,630.00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 1.081.25
Fees Paid to Date $ 2,864.25
Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00
*T 0 Be Determined
3
R:IAGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\TM29928 ALL FNL.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 29928-1
DATE: SeDtem er 17, 2002
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 219,000 $ 109,500
Water $ 67,000 $ 33,500
Sewer $ 78,500 $ 39,250
TOTAL $ 364,500 $ 182,250
Monumentation $ 20,750 $
b
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ *TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 142.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 8.00
Plan Check Fee $ 1,570.00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 1,037.50
Fees Paid to Date $ 2,757.50
Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00
*To Be Determined
4
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\20021091 7021TM29928 ALL FNL.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 29928-2
DATE: Seotember 17, 2002
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 243,500 $ 121,750
Water $ 86,000 $ 43,000
Sewer $ 99,500 $ 49,750
TOTAL $ 429,000 $ 214,500
Monumentation $ 22,875
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ *TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 147.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 8.00
Plan Check Fee $ 1,670.00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 1.143.75
Fees Paid to Date $ 2,968.75
Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00
*To Be Determined
5
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\200210917021TM29928 ALL FNL.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 29928-3
DATE: SeDtember 17, 2002
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 167,500 $ 83,750
Water $ 58,500 $ 29,250
Sewer $ 84,500 $ 42,250
TOTAL $ 310,500 $ 155,250
Monumentation $ 17,375
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ *TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 137.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 8.00
Plan Check Fee $ 1,470.00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 868.75
Fees Paid to Date $ 2,753.75
Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00
*To Be Determined
6
R\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091 702\TM29928 ALL FNL.doc
(J
~
f
Vj
/......
~
LO
~
C\J
I-
lJ.J~
aU)
a:
~
~
'6
'0>
~
~
~
c...
<C
~~
<r:
)-obi
~~
~
Zi::;
= z
()
"""'"
>
OtrOc!l tr
81 :t lc!ltr()c!I~fV
OQ
<.'-1
!S
~
on
b
N
~
<
~ ex) ~
~ N ~~
is OJ .;;
~ OJ ~B
in N ~~
l'i I~
Vi ~l!I
~ ~
~ 0 n
I: Z ~~
g -.
.< ~.
cl .a
'!! ~ ~"
i" U ~~:i
~ --~
~ <( :~3
~ Ct: ~!~
"'~iWl
~
"~
5"~ . .
~ ~i~t-~~In g
'i 5.~.~" ~ . ~ i
~ l!Ia!: it:i': ~
w~ .' -,.~ ~~ ' ;' -
;I ::i III I::! ~!Il!. ...... * .....
! ~ HHI ~~g il d ~ ;
~ : ~ ~~ ~~ BSS !~ '" Ii ~ ii
i i Hi ;~ ~HI i n ~ i
~ :' i "3 "j; ",~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~. ~. ,.~~ ~~ . . . - ,
~ I. ~ ~ ~~ ~;. ~~~ ii ; ; ; ~ ;~
:;1' ~ !l_ II S lli~ i ~ ~ ~ <S
~ Ii~ Ii ~ i~ i~~ ~.~ ~iij ~ ~ ~ g
f:! l!~ l! il -~ At;; .5S ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~ : h m ~i~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g
~
.: N ,.j .; ..; ..;,.:..;.,;!:!
VI l:Il8;3:!,!!
~ 9 ci~~~
.
~ ~ ~'e~
~ 1,3..
<
2
~ ! ~Ill;~
u _
~ 9
~ - Ii
: ~~. ~ : ,~
~ ;;i ; I : ili ~ !:
~ s~l! ,~. ~ ," M ~ m~
i ~~~ i, ~ ~ Ii~~ 8 l! ~
~ ~~~ ~ ~~" - ~ ~
I; ;~~ Ii H. ~~: ~ a
~'" - r ~ ~il ::~ ~ i~~
~: m iH I~ i~~ ~ ~I~;
1'1 i~ ~5~;; ~~. ~ Iii ;~.i~ ~. ~ ~
'" .. - · -"~~ ~t ~ i
i51 ~~ ~.~, ~~ ~ ,i !:JI" !. ~,,~
x~ X~~i x~ X ~y !oe ~ !o,.; . ..
H ~~ . ~,; ;l;~~
"$ . .[3[3 BEl
^
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ S~E~%21ll~~~~~~~~~~~~3~~~~~~~;~
!!f 1111111'2~n811Iin81 t 1881188888
! i '-'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ri~
~ ~ ~~~~,,~~.~. ~~f.~.~~~..~~.....
~ l ~~~~~~~p~~~~~~~~~~~F~~~~~~F~~
~a~s~g~~ft~~8~~8o~~~a~8~8~~~~l
iiiii~~i:~~i~~:i"~ii~:~i~~'"~
~,
~<
~
~I
in
~~
5~
i" i!~
51 ~Wl
Uli
~M
b ~'l!
~ ~~~
m ~<c1!i
~~~
~~i
~~~
~ ~~~
!Z ~"~
- ~~"
~ ..~
~~F
~; .~a
i""
_~i
- ~5~
ffi ~".
_""~~G~G.2=~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~
//
. ~~ 2
<(
~ ! ~~ i
~~ ~ 8(:) ~
~ 0 >-2 ~
[~ 0::-
~~ ~
0 lil ~
~
~
on
b
N
~
.< ..--
g I
~ eX)~!
(,) Nbc;:
b '" l'
i" VJ.~
~ (J) li~
. NIt
B ~i
~ .'
- ~~
'" ~
b '-
"
~ O~~
uZ.......
. .
~ ~a
'!! '.
w L- ~-.
'" ,- .~-
15 U;-~
g <( ~i3
'I' rv~J
I- L...L.... Itl!!:S
:;;~
,~
5"~
~ ~i~ ~~ ~
, . 5. ~,m ~ii S
~ ! w~ ~~ ':-;8 ~~ " Ii
9 ,. -~ ., ~'; . t ~
! n :Hi ~~ql ~ i I
~ 5 ~ S~ ~~sS ,~~ m g ~
i ~ Hni ~PH ; n
~ ~ i ~S g~ ~~i' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.' '. ,. '.~ ~~ . _ 8,
~ ~ S ~~ ~.. ~-~ ": 3 3 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~. ~~~ I" ~. I. I!! ~
51 ~. ~ " ~~ ~iS ~~S Ii ;~ ~~ ~ ~
!" ~" ~ !l ~, ~-~ :5~ 8 ~~ ~~ ~ ~
~ l!; l! g i~ ii~ ~is " g~ g~ ~ g
~ ~~ ~ 0 ~i ~~~ ~~~ :8 . ,; .;.;
- ... ..;
! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~::1grat::!;~2~:II2~..~g:
" "-
~; ~
., .
. -
'; ~
!!J 811'2111~11111'~1~
;~~~ ~ ;~
.... ............"" ",!",..~..... ,-,
~ ~ ft~~S~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~~8~~~~R~~??~~~p
I =~~~~~~.~~2~.'.8
~
e "s
~ ~".
~ ;;i I: ~ .;
~ B~i ;" . ~
~ ~~~ - t ~
~ . -:~~ . ~ ~ ~
~- . ~ ~ ~
~, "i~ ~.
~i i;: ! h .~ ~
~"~i~ ~~! ~q
iR -.~ ~ ~i ~i ,
~ i~ ~ij ~ ~m ~q
51 I!!~ ~~c, ~ il!!i ~
i ~~ ~~'. ~,,~.~ S
g~ ~'.i ~ l:~ ~~ ~
...@ .13l!:!1~
~l
~5
~I
~~
U
li~
i" ~I,
51 ~~.
Ui!
~M
b ~'l!
!!! ~~~
~ ~!.
~
l~s
!::!u~
, .
d~
~ ~!~
~-;>;
~ ;ia
~ 3'~
~ IF.
" .~a~
! i~'~
,. ~~iii
CJ ~!!!I!l!.
_"'~.~m~am2~~~~~~
~ ~ ~~.~~
~ 9: 00000
~ ~ ."~~;
~ ~ 0..."
z ~.
i
~ ! ~:Il~i;
~ 9
~
on
b
N
~
<N
~ I ~
~ ex) ~~
uN..
~ OJ ~i
~ Q) li~
l'i N I~
- '.
II! ~
~ ~i!
~ ~~
> ~
~ O;i~
g Z';L
.< ~.
a .a
~ i5~
i" ~ ~~.
~ u !S!
t:; <( ."'~
U l-
~ Ct: ~l!~
~~
.
~
~~
~ 0 ~
U
.
,~
5"~
~ ~i~ ~~
5. ~.~~"
~ ~ ~.a' il -.
! ~~. ~~ ~~~ i~ , , I
~ ~ H~ il ~;g Ih i ~
~ ~ I ~~ ~~ s~~,~ R ~ m
~ g 5~", "". ~~ l! l! l! ~
! . ~ ~~ ~~ ~~;:~ ~ ~ ~ a
. . i 's "j; ,,~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1'1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~;i =~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" B B - ~.~. . ~ - ~ ~
51 ii, ii ~ .8 .~s ~,,~!~ ~. 1 ~ ~
~ Ii'~. ~ ~ i~ i~~ ~h I~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~
0,; . _ "I At;;. " · ~~ ~~ ~~ ~
~. i ~ i W ~1' . ~~ ~~ ~~-
~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ ~~~ ~ti ~ ~~ :: ~ = ~
- ... ..; .; .,; ..; ..: "j .,;
Ill: ~
lStg
~ ~
e "s e
~ ~". ~
~ ;;; ~ I ~ ill!
'i ~~i ~ ~ ~ M ~
~ . -:~~ ~. ~ ~ Ii~~ ~
I: :~~ 1:; iz i!~ ;
~i ~ii ii; ~~ ~~~ ~
i~, i ~ ~i ~t!,~ ~
~ ~rii iH ~i i~~~ E
51 ~~ ~~~' ~~ ~ ~i !:J~~ ~
~ ~~ ~,h ~~ ~ j'~ ~~~l ~
~"<!l <JeS13 51
~~
i5~
i" ~!i
51 ~W'
~ r~
u!m
b ~'l!
!!l ~~~
~ ~!.
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ R~~2~~i~~ft~N~ft~;~~~R~~~ig~~
~~~
.-~
;g"'.
~~~
i" ~--Ii
o 8.
z ~-
!i' ~".
- a:~~
IIi!
II~!
- ~~i
15 ~".
~ 1111118112828'21128111188888
~ ~ E -~-~- -E ~~~~~
~ ~ ~~~~~~. ~~~. ~.~~~~.~~~,.....
~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~?~~~~~~??~F~~~~~
i ~~?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P?f~~~~
i ii~~~~~i~i~i~i~~i~i;ii!;~~~
i _N~~~~~~~2:~~:~~~~~~N~~~~~~
~ ~ 6.~..
!1l 900000
~ ~ ....s
~ I.....
~
~ ! !i;~~'
u ,
~ 3
~
~~
~.
~
~I
~!Il
12
...
-'
OD-
0::... ~
>-::0 ;
8~ ~
&~ ~
~!;i g
m~~
-
-~
/-1
_J :-'1
~g:::~J ~~
~~J Jo.I~
.t:: AVI !J ij
~:~ ilj
Ol,,_J ~
I- ~~1~;0 :
"I~ -
- .
"'J~
~ -Ii" 0 i
m ~ .....4~ I s.
I~ ~;:!-t~~
~~ ~--;t-j-}
I \ ~c N~~ ~t-
\ ci" 1 ~~'
\..\ ",g -I ~
r I t,,'-I-
'I 0l-'i-1
~~ I 1-_ j
~ ~ ~ ~.: ':'"~ Ii::
'n~ j
~
on
b
N
~
<I")
~ I
~
;;! ex) ~.
~ N .B
i" OJ ~~
~ OJ 6~
~ N I'
~ :;
<r ~
is .~
~ 0";'"
g Z ~.;
_ .5~
< g,
"j ~'3
u ~~_
~ ~ iS~
~ u .~~
~u- <( !~
1IIi!:~
~Ct:
~~
6a-99/S62 'S"N
I / 9h.6l .dN b""~ I
~-.J_J.-.J_I_Ll..J./ _
OVOij v u~mrv" 1
9llo66tl 1.\it,IS.l:tN
. saNl~~S!!.___
f----
,~
5"~
~ ~i~ ~~ g
~ ~ ~!~ ~,t ~~ s
~ ~: ~~ j~~ ~~ i ~
I d iH~ ~~ql ~ i i ;
~ U ;n~ ~~i ~~I : ! : ~:
~ ~ I · B s' g:, ~ · ~
~: ~ ~ ,;~ ~~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
III ~ ~3!.g ~.~i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III
~ ~ s ~~ ~; ~~i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~. ~~~ Ii 8 8 8 ~
~ ~~ ~ : ~~ ~wB ~iB I~~ ~I. ~I. ~I. ~ ~
'" !; Ii S ~, p~ ":~ iij m ~ ~ ~ ~
o . . ~ 1 ;is "-0 e i5 i5 i5 2
~ ~ ~ g i i~~ ~iS . ~~ ~~ ~~ j ~
~ ~~ ~ < ~ ~~~ Iii~~ ,il :: : ~ j g
_ N ..; .. ,,; ci ..: -i .,; 2
I
_J
Ill: ~
tli
'1
'" o.
! ~
!:: !!
.
.
...~~
. -15
S~i
~ ~
~ - ~ Ii
~ ~~ ~ · f~
; ~;i ; I ~ ill! i !:
~ ~~i ~ ~ ~ M ~ m~
! ~i~ ! ~ ~ Ii~~ ~ l!;
~ 2i~ ~.: ,~ :I~ ~ ~r
~,~~: ~,~ h u: ~ ~~ .
I~ Hi I~ Ilni~ : ~llf
~i ~l!i~ ~I i~" p' ~ ! ll:
~ ~~ ~~~_ ~~ ~ m~ i~~~ i~ :, l!
.~ . _ _ .~. i .gl" " ..!;
I ~ ~r. ~ ~ ,,~.~ 6 .. ~,~
g~ g'~i g~ g H ~~ ~ ~i ;l;~~
<II@ 41_1313 B@
N
,
"
N
0>
0>
N
o "
z
t .
02 "!
I- "
.
~~
~6
~I
~!2
~~
5!:
i" ~!~
51 ~W'
Y.l ~-.
!! ~~i
U~i
b ~'l!
~ ~~~
~ ~..
~~~
!!!c:;i
, .
.~~
~m
!< ~"'
- ~~"
~ ..~
~ ~~.
;/ !~s
Ii~'
- 8~1
~ ~".
. .
~ ~~~~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~
~ !=~~~R~o3~~;~~2%~E~~8~
/ ~ 1111182111'282111111888
'. /1 ~ ~ ~- T ~~~
I) ~ ~ w.... www.. ....w..
/( at ~ ~~~a~~~i~~~~~~~~!~;;;~
~)w =aa~~~~i'8!R*~8~s~a~~~
/ I :: iiii~!i~~~~~i~~iiii!mjq
I)g
'I~-
'1 {2-
,1:::'5
I, >...J
II ~
. IlJ:
\ W~l...1
. , -
"
./
,
~ Jl
~
~N~*~G~GG2=~~~~~~~~~N~
,
0>
"
~
m
N
o "
z
~ Q ~~.
~ !;1: 000
~ ~ E;.~
~ ~no
Z ~ -
~
2
~ ! ~~~
u ,
~ S
t . '5
~ ~...J
I- "
~
--'
~~ ~
!z '" ~
~~ ~
0::- ~
~<1- g
W ~
~ -
gVl~
ITEM 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: 'VI1( William G, Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: September 17, 2002
SUBJECT: Tract Map Nos. 29929 and 29929-1 located within the Harveston Specific
Plan
PREPARED BY: to aid J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
ie Bostre-Le, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATIO That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map Nos, 29929 and 29929-1
in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreements and
accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for the agreement 3)
Subdivision Monument Agreements and accept the Monument Bonds as security for the agreement.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No, 29929 is a fifty-one (51 )-Iot subdivision located south of
Harveston Drive and west of Ysabel Barnett Elementary School. Tract Map No, 29929-1 is a
seventy-four (74)-lot subdivision located north of Lake Front Road, south of Bristol Road, west of
Village Road and east of Newport Road, Both subdivisions are located in the Harveston Specific
Plan,
On July 12 and August 14, 2001, the City Planning Commission and City Council, respectively,
approved the Tentative Tract Maps, with the appropriate Conditions of Approval.
The Developer, Harveston, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company, by Lennar Homes of
California has met all of the Conditions of Approval. These final maps are in conformance with the
approved tentative tract map, The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies
with the approved tentative map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law,
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1, Development Fee Checklist
2, Fees & Securities Report for Tract Map No. 29929 and 29929-1
3. Project Vicinity Map
4. Tract Map No, 29929
5. Tract Map No, 29929-1
1
R:\AGENDA REPORTS'2002\091702\TM29929 and 29929-' FNL.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 29929 and TM 29929-1
Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Flood Control (ADP)
Paid, This fee is due prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
Development Impact Fee
Not Paid, This fee will be collected prior to
issuance of building permits.
2
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\TM29929 and 29929-1 FNL.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 29929
. eptem er 17, 2002
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 152,000 $ 76,000
Water $ 37,000 $ 18,500
Sewer $ 40,000 $ 20,000
TOTAL $ 229,000 $ 114,500
Monumentation $ 23,875
DATE S b
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ *TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 152,00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 8,00
Plan Check Fee $ 1,770,00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 1,193.75
Fees Paid to Date $ 3,123,75
,
Balance of Fees Due $ 0,00
*To Be Determined
3
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\TM29929 and 29929.1 FNL.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 29929-1
DATE: September 17, 2002
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 415,500 $ 207,750
Water $ 119,000 $ 59,500
Sewer $ 141,500 $ 70,750
TOTAL $ 676,000 $ 338,000
Monumentation $ 32,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ -TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 175.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 8,00
Plan Check Fee $ 2,230,00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 1 ,600,00
Fees Paid to Date $ 4,013,00
Balance of Fees Due $ 0,00
*To Be Determined
4
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\TM29929 and 29929-' FNL.doc
~
~
&
~
rf
Vj
/......
-f'
~~
OCi5
a:
o/YOc!l
g /Y.1/c!I/YQc!I~fV
/......'?:
~
~
~
<2
~
'6
~
'i
~
i;.
a..
<C
:2:w
~
<(
>~
1= 2
......
Zb
...... z
()
......
>
rOp.,O
yN(Z
~
~
""
'"
~
~
~ . 5.
" @."
~ ~ ~~ ~~
! ~ ~ ~Hi
; ; Hn~
~ n ~! ;~
i ; ~ ;~ i:
~ ~ "" ~~ "i;
o B ~ ~ ,.' '~5.
z. !fa !l"-I
(I') ~p ~ I'l ..:; "'!r
- Ii Ii ~ ~. ~,
~ l!~ l! g i~ iis
~ ~~ ~ 4 ~i '5~
~ ~ ~~
. f ~!2
".
:Si.5 ,
~H II;;!
S~s@ ,~ R i I .
~Ui ~I' ~
",... w i i i '"
-:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~i" t ~~ ~ ~ ~ a
~;;~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
......~; !.!: ~ ~ ~ ~
~~;g I; !g ig Ig ~
~5~S ~~ ~~~~~~g
~g'~~ ~. g~g~gH
.U. ~il :: ~ = ~
"Ii
~ ~~~ ~ ~ i
, ., "', ,
~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~
~ s~l! ~ ~
i ~~~ ~. ~ ~
I~' ~~~ I~' i~ ~
!i "i~ !i ."
c ,."~ .: ,.
I! ~!i I: I!;i
~~ '5' ~~ ~~ ' .
~ I~ ~~j I~ Il! ~~
51 ~~ ~~~' ~~ ~~ ~l!
~ g~ g'~!i g~ g~ g~
~.. €I .tJ..
~
to
N
~
-i ... iii ,..: .; .,;
~ ... ..;
~ ~
~ OJ ~3
~ N~'
b OJ l!~
~ OJ ~~
in N .~
i'i h
~ 61
!:! u
~ ~~ Ill: ~
,.. 0 ~. II!; ·
~ Z ~!!
.< ~~
~ ~ ;~ f--r!/!
Is U E g - f.~ ...........('j../~
~ <.::( ~~ N '" ~. .~.Ol~)
~ Ct:;; dJ" ...""';';" - '\)a '
~ ~~" 4'-., <:, 8
~ ~. \$' 1; ,,;- --IIi
A3,.,-!, '" >! 1\7
..,'/6 ~ a::
~""',/',. .... ',.1-\
--\\oJ-
~ \Y..
,\ ',;,- ~~ /.!~
~'o~"~~ ~~-!.1",
~1..1.,&" ~~~
1.111.'~"'.~...o_!t~~~~.;,
'i-C 1.? ~1
'0tl. ,,~ ..,
y""~, .'"
r~
r"'-"!. ....."
"0> "
"" - "
co. _--r-...........,
01-- I
"'.., <>", /'
'<
~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^~^^^^ ^
S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~8~8Si~:g~~
~ ~~~~;~;~;~~~~t~E"':~~"':~"'~~~~Q~~
H~
I ~ '
. ~ ~
~ a
J
..: i ,
S
!l 111~1~1~1~1118811111128118181
"9 ~. ~ ~ ~~ -~" 8
~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~
< ~ ~~~,~.~.~. ~~~. . ~~~~~~~ w. . w
~ d ~~~?~~~~?~~~P~~~~~~~~?~~~~~~~
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~F??~8g8~~~~~~3~~
I ~~~~~~i~~~g~~~~g~~~~~~8~ij~~~~
~ _N~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~
~~
~.
, ~
~I
~!!,!
~~
~
~-
i"!I.
51~"
~ ~~l
h!;
b ~'l!
l!l ~~~
~ ~~.
"
.;
~
.
i"L
;;; l!~
~ .7
!2~
~~
,'//
(~-~~l/'
I ................-
/ r---
I .".",
.Q~"
,
.r
~'"
~
O.
'f \
G-
,,;r .,.
~.
~
~
~~
~;o
~ U
l
~~
J.~
~~
~~~
.~"
i" ~~~
~ s~!:!
!z ~",
- ~~a
~ ..~
~ ~~'.~
8 ~~>-~
~ t:!i
~ .J.
- .~~-
ffi ~".~
o
Z
<1:
...J
OCL
~~ !
ox
uw ~
>- 2 ~
"'- ~
CSt- ~
?i l:J ~
gili~
~
. 5"
e ~ ~ ".
s , ~~ ~~
! ~! :nl
; ~ ~ ~~ ~~
. ~ 5. ~~
! ~ I ~! ;~
~ g ~ ~~ ~;
~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~.
51 - - ~ ~. ~"I
en ~~ ~ n ...:; ....!i!
.~ . g ~, ~,
; iH : ~H!~
'"
~
on
b
N
~
:':
~
~
u
b
i"
<
"
'"
..--
I
OJi
N l!~
OJ ~~
OJ ,,~
N ~;;
~B
~~ ~ ~
~~
~" .
O~
z -;
~
l!l
;;;
'"
~
;r
b
,.
"
~
a
u
<
a ".
~ i5~
= ~ ~.
~ u ~a<
u <( <:!:~
~ Ct: ~~~
~~
1
~
~
~
~
~.
d ~~
Z c;i!
:si
~,,~ ~~,
;;i ii ~
s~.t;i ,~ R
~!ji ~~ l!
-:~~~ ~~ ~
~i"t ~~ ~
i;U :~ ~
~i~g I; !~
~;.~ S ~g ~~
~~'~~ ~!i g~
~~~, ~ll :;
- ... ..;
.
..; ...
~~
!!!a:;i!
1'.
d~
~ ~~;
._1'
~ ~~~
~ ..~
'l! ~~'.~
8 ~Ir-;
i I~!i
~ ~~i~
CJ ~!!!l!l9
e "':'8
i ~~"
2 .-.
, ~~.
~ S"l!
~ ....
, >~g
I.N
~ i~~
I' 2i~
!I (:ltl
" ~oe
I!m
~g '5'
~ "f. ~~j
51 ~~ ~~c,
I !: :i~i
~
~ ~
~
I ~
~ ~
I ~i
. ~-
~~ '.
~d~
,i .:~
im ~~
~l! ~~
~g ~Ii
<S~ 15ft
g~ gl!
. .
'"
~
/"
/"
/"
/"
/"
/"
/"
I/"/"
I
~. I
"-
U~ I
~~i I
~:i \
\
.J
,.).~1 .
III ",;;11.1:' ...
)oj.
Se.
-;:.
~
'-......
\
l
o \
, ~~ @ \
II ~ >
w ~
l1 I
-' I
I
\
/
(
)
/
I
I
I
\
\
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ N3:~;&~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~ lill~I~I~I~II~I~lilllllll
~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ "..
! i~ ~~~~~?~~~~~~~~?~~~~~~~~
~ =8$~g8~~~B~N~=~Ba~~8'~~
~ ~g~~!gi~~m~~~~gnm!
~~~~R~~~~~R~~~i;~~l~*~*
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~"'~;"'E~~2a~~;~;~;~aN~R~i&
!l 1111118811181818181111111
! ~ m~ ~ ~ Ii ~
~ ~ ~~~~~~.. ~~~.,.,.~. ~~,~,~,
a ~ ~~~~~~F~~~~~p~~~~?~~~~~~~
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~F~~F~F~
~ mnM1!me!~geg~ii!~im
_~~.~G~G~~=~~~~~~,~ft~~~~~
'"
\
\
"~~/ ".
~~ ~ .
~~ - "
~~ !" ,.~---
~ ",]!;C"~-_=r~ ~;'-,
~ -- / "
-' -
..... 133!Us J.!Vo 1/0/
~
.
.
.
<
.
.
O!/ Ava HlOO8
/
/
(
I
I
/
I
I
~___ I
- 3^ I ~2- N01S3Ali -;;..L.
- -~
1~lfJf(-r::~
I II ;?II' /'
I II~ II' /
/ .
82662 .ON fJ"fA(
.L;)VlI"
'\
'"
" -
'"
'"
<;:
~ ~.
'"
\
,..
~
~~
Ii'
, ~
~I
~~
~~ .
~"
i" ~I,
51 ~"~
U~!
~ I!m
b ii"l!
!!l ~~~
~ ~."
,
Cl
Z
<
..J
00..
"'< ~
1-::<
Z
OX ~
uw
Cl
~~ ~
< ~
~w 2
::>~ -
ffiVl ~
ITEM 14
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
trJ~ William G, Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 17, 2002
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Tract Map No. 30088 located north of Township Road, south of Harveston
School Road, west of Margarita Road and east of Harveston Drive within the
Harveston Specific Plan
PREPARED BY: ~onald J, Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
nnie Bostre-Le, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATI. That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No, 30088 in conformance
with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement 3) Subdivision Monument
Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 30088 is a forty-nine (49) lot subdivision located north
of Township Road, south of Harveston School Road, west of Margarita Road and east of Harveston
Drive within the Harveston Specific Plan,
On July 12 and August 14, 2001, the City Planning Commission and City Council, respectively,
approved the Tentative Tract Map, with the appropriate Conditions of Approval.
The Developer, Harveston, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company, by Lennar Homes of
California has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the
approved tentative tract map, The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies
with the approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law,
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATIACHMENTS:
1, Development Fee Checklist
2, Fees & Securities Report
3, Project Vicinity Map
4, Tract Map No, 30088
r:lagdrpt\2002\0423\tm2682B.map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 30088
Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Flood Control (ADP)
Paid, This fee is due prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
Development Impact Fee
Not Paid, This fee will be collected prior to
issuance of building permits,
2
r:\agdrpt\2002\0423\tm26B2B.map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP N . 30088 DATE: eptember 17, 2002
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 251,000 $ 125,500
Water $ 81,000 $ 40,500
Sewer $ 92,000 $ 46,000
TOTAL $ 424,000 $ 212,000
Monumentation $ 22,000
o
S
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ *TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 147,00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 8,00
Plan Check Fee $ 1,670,00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 1,100,00
Fees Paid to Date $ 2,925.00
Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00
*To Be Determined
3
r:\agdrpl\2002\0423\tm26B2B.map
ROAD
GS
p~\~
0<(' <5 z
,",0 \ ~-!
woo
>0<
O:::IO
<U~
IVl~
\t1~
t.'U~R
a.
<( Q)
~ 0
()
(f)
~ 0
- -rJ
Z -rJ
-
0 0
Z
-
>
ca
~
.4-
':::.
~
<&
4
~
Ob-oc::Y
<~-1{
C)
d
Q:'
ft
{:]
is
f
~
on
b
N
~
.. _.c
~ ex) a!
!: ex) l!~
~ 0 ~~
b 0 ,,~
~ ~-
;: "'"' .~
I/} 1- .J liD:
~ I"
lQ ~I
~ . ~.
~ 0 ~!
~z ~;
u .
. .;
< "
a ~ 3~
~ u i~
~ <( Ea
!:; rv ~.
u L.L .-
iii L- ~~
~ r- Ill;;:
~
~
~
.~
i;!t ~. ~ ~~: . !
~ 5 ~~" ~ ".._ ~ ~~
~ ~,,~ :'.~ ~ ~ ~ia I ~: g!
~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~i' ; ~ ~~; ~ ~ i ~ ~I
~ m ~ ~~ i,l ~;g i~ ~ ~ ~. "i~ d ~ ~ ;;
~ ~ ~ . ~ ,w.~ ~.~ ~~ * . il ~ ~>" ~ ~ ~, ~.
. . ~ .~ ~ SB_.S ~ ~" t" ~ ~ ~ I ~e
I I i !I;i ::1:1 ii' i ':; .! ~ il ,I!I
! · i ~n~ ~~i ~~ ~ d~ ini: h ~ ; ~ :il
~ ! ~ ~~~; ~~n~ ~ n~ ~i F;: ~,~ i ~m _ ~~'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~;. ,~~~ I" 1 ~ ~~ ~ -~ ~~,~, m ~z ~ ~l! ! ;~:
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~! ~~! ~~ ~~ ~ ~II ~~ ~:~ ~ ~h H ~ ~~~
. ~9 ~ ~ ~ ~.. .5, i8 ~~ ~ ~ g. __~,. ~~~
I in ~ ~I ~!j ~i~ :~ ~~ ~ : . 0 . B 8 B ~ ~."
, "
"<-
!lu~
. .
~~~
n~~
.-.
~ .~~
~ ~,,~
~~i~
I j~'~
;: ~:;i~
l:l ~!!!l!5!
~ ~~8~~~~~~~~~~
~ lQ~~~!:::i:;la~jjj"'''~
~ 1111~1~1~81Ig
f ~ ~ · ~~
: < ~~~~.~ ~. ~~~~
~ a ~~~;~~~~~~~~~
3 ~ a~~8~~~~~~9~~
E ~~i~2i~2:!!:iii
~ ~ OS;;",
-< 15_..._8
~ 00000
~ ~ "30--
~ I'~~.~
.
2
~ i ~~~!t~
u .
~ 3
lid ~
I[i ~
O_rH'l
-.....,.............----
'OJ"lT585E/R'1Il; 'OJ
~ "-;'\~"'t.
\\ ~.i.4l"'
\...~\
\~~
~
~.
M,i
~ u- "'-.
U "
"';!
i=-
.=~
t':'l'
j='"
g~1
h_
~
g
I
:I
I
i
:I
~
,
.
"
:'
;~~
{
~
g~ i
8~ ~
~- ~
~i~
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AUGUST 27, 2002
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:31
P.M, at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5
DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Pratt, Stone
ABSENT:
o
DIRECTORS:
None
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 23, 2002;
1.2 Approve the minutes of August 13, 2002.
2 Arts Council Communitv Grant AQreement
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Community Grant Agreement between the Temecula Community
Services District (TCSD) and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley in the amount
of $40,000.00
MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2. The
motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Development Services Administrator McCarthy advised that the last concert at the CRC
amphitheater will be on Thursday, July 25, 2002, at 6:30 P.M.
Minutes.csd\082702
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
President Stone commented on the upcoming Pre-Film Festival Media Extravaganza and invited
the public to attend on Thursday, July 25,2002,6:00 P.M., at Tower Plaza.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:33 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 7:00 P.M" City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.csd\082702
2
ITEM 2
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER {)D
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Board of Directors
Herman D, Parker, Director of Community servicestfi>
September 17, 2002
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Tract Map No, 23209 - Service Level B, Service Level C and Service
Level D Rates and Charges
PREPARED BY:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst ~:;,..-
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RECOMMENDATION:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A
REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND
SERVICE LEVEL 0 RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT MAP NO. 23209
BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under
the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting, perimeter
landscaping and slope landscaping maintenance and trash/recycling collection services to
numerous residential subdivisions within the City of Temecula through Service Level "B", Service
Level "c" and Service Level "D", The boundaries of the TCSD are coterminous with the City, and
the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD,
Tract Map No. 23209 is a future 220 lot residential development. The development consists of
approximately 80.0 gross acres of vacant property located to the west of Butterfield Stage Road and
east of Walcott Lane. The property owner has requested that the TCSD establish the future parcel
charges necessary to provide ongoing revenue for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping
and slope maintenance, and trash/recycling collection services within this development.
R:\smithb\Elections\23209 Election\Staff-Notice of Hearing 9-02.doc
09/09/2002
Beginning Fiscal Year 2003-2004, the following TCSD rates and charges are proposed for
residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and trash/recycling
collection services within Tract Map No. 23209:
Service Level B
$ 25,68 per residential parcel
$ 200,00 per residential parcel
Service Level C
Service Level D
$172,56 per occupied parcel
Pursuant to the provisions of Proposition 218, the TCSD is required to hold a public hearing and
obtain voter or property owner approval in order to establish certain new rates and charges, In
addition, a report must be prepared and filed with the Secretary/City Clerk which identifies all of the
affected parcels and the amount of the proposed rates and charges, A notice is mailed to the
property owner identifying the proposed rates and charges and date of the Public Hearing, The
Public Hearing is held at least 45 days after the mailing of the notices, If the proposed rates and
charges are not reJected pursuant to a written protest, then the TCSD will conduct a mailed ballot
proceeding not less than 45 days after the public hearing, The proposed rates and charges for
Service Level B and Service Level C cannot be imposed unless the property owner has approved
the new charges, In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners shall receive notice of the
proposed charges for Service Level D, however, mailed ballot proceedings are not required to
impose rates and charges for trash/recycling collection services,
Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report
on the proposed residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and
trash/recycling collection services rates and charges for Tract Map No, 23209 beginning in Fiscal
Year 2003-2004 and schedule a public hearing concerning this issue for November 12, 2002, Staff
will then proceed with noticing the owner of Tract Map No, 23209 regarding the proposed rates and
charges and the public hearing date, If there is no majority protest against the rates and charges on
November 12, 2002 staff will then proceed with the mailed ballot process for Service Level Band
Service Level C,
FISCAL IMPACT: If voter approved, upon buildout of the development, the proposed
rates and charges of $25,68 and 200,00 per parcel will generate an annual levy of $5,649,60, forthe
Service Level Band $44,000,00 for Service Level C, The proposed Service Level D charge of
$172.56 per parcel will generate an annual levy of $37,963,20, (Pursuant to Proposition 218, this
amount may be increased by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 after conducting an additional
public hearing, However, mailed ballot proceedings are not required to increase Service Level D
rates and charges,) Actual costs for providing long-term residential street lighting and perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance services within Tract Map No, 23209 will be absorbed into
Service Level B and Service Level C upon installation of said improvements, The owner of Tract
Map No, 23209 has paid the administrative and mailing costs associated with the public notices and
ballot information required per Proposition 218,
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2,
3,
Vicinity Map
TCSD Landscape Maintenance Area
Resolution of Intention
R;\smithb\Elections\23209 Election\Staff.Notice of Hearing 9-02.doc
09/09/2002
VICINITY MAP
Tract No. 23209
Not to Scale
PROJECT
SITE
~.
PROJECT MAP
T:~~~::,::~~~~j
-----:.
:::;
0..
III
III
,;.;
I"")
..;f
o
N
o
o
N
"
I'-
"
<0
o
~
:J
g,
o
...J
0>
;<
~~
x
N
I
~
I
co
I
c
o
E
I
C>-
()
(JJ
-0
C
...J
I
~
.D
.<:::
x
OJ
/
(JJ
~
1i
.<:::
x
w~
/(1)
col'-
I"");::!
0jLl'i
/.;:.
a:
C) .
z<l:
w~
/5
.. ....
f-LL
. /
OFFSITE
/.' A.~fA 2
, /
/. .'
/~
)
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
- SLOPES MAINTAINED BY TCSD
TCSD LOT
AREA
S. FT.)
/11,7ZZ
41,8U
17.J86
10,880
z""
6.492
2,916
In
128
D4
WJ
""
OFFSITE AREA J
QFFSITE AREA I
! ROAD R10HT-OF_WA. Y
I LANDSCA.PING
,
89,605
TOTAL
348,104
.I
I
!
i
/
~
\
\ \
OFFSITE
AREA 1
,
~
i
~ ~C<HVLTANlS
~ r..w.a.~.a--.S-IGPS
41460 RCdp Pla.... lJoroWt. s..u. "0 ~ a. U510
""US'SSM 'AX 696.6697
NOT TO SCALE
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A
REPORT WITH RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND
SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT MAP NO. 23209
BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE
DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,1989, voters
approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide specified
services to properties within its jurisdiction,
Section 2. The TCSD provides long-term residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping
and slope landscape maintenance, and trashlrecycling collection services in numerous residential
developments within the City of Temecula, Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and
61621,2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street
lighting (Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level C), and
trash/recycling collection (Service Level D) services furnished by it, and has elected to have these
rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the
same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by
Government Code Sections 61765,2 to 61765,6, inclusive,
Section 3. The TCSD hereby initiates proceedings to provide residential street lighting,
perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and trash/recycling collection services within Tract
Map No. 23209 beginning Fiscal Year 2003-2004, Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621,2,
the TCSD has caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the
TCSD, (Exhibit A) which Report contains a description of the real property and the proposed amount
of the Service Level B, Service Level C, and Service Level 0 rates and charges required for
residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, and trash/recycling
collection services provided to each parcel within Tract Map No, 23209 and its subsequent phases
beginning fiscal year 2003-2004. The TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same
time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the
property taxes collected within the TCSD, These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same
time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes, All laws
applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to,
those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, shall
be applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section
4831, However, if for the first year the charges are levied, the real property to which the charge
relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona
fide encumbrance for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the
first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the
property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection,
Section 4. The Board of Directors hereby acknowledges the filing of the Report, and appoints the
day of November 12, 2002 at the hour of 7:00 p,m" or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City
Council Chambers at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590, as the
time and place for the public hearing on the Report and the proposed Service Level B, Service Level
C, and Service Level D rates and charges, At the public hearing, the Board of Directors will hear and
consider all objections or protests, if any, to the Report. The Board may continue the hearing from
time to time,
Section 5. The Secretary of the TCSD is hereby directed to give notice of the filing of the
Report and of the time and place of hearing on the Report pursuant to the requirements of
Government Code Section 61765,2 and Section 6 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution,
Section 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community
Services District this September 17th of 2002,
Jeffrey E, Stone, Presideni
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/District Secretary for the Temecula Community Services District, do
hereby certify that Resolution No, CSD 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the board of
Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on
September 17'h of 2002.
AYES:
NOES:
BOARD MEMBERS
BOARD MEMBERS
ABSENT:
BOARD MEMBERS
Exhibit A
CITY OF TEMECULA
TRACT MAP NO. 23209
INITIAL LEVY REPORT
Service Levels B, C and D
Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
Commencing Fiscal Year 2003-2004
INTENT MEETING:
PUBLIC HEARING:
September 17, 2002
November 12, 2002
INTRODUCTION:
A. The TCSD
Since December 1, 1989, the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD") has
provided residential street lighting, perimeters landscaping and slope maintenance, trash
and recycling collection and other services to properties within its jurisdiction, The
boundary of the TCSD is coterminous with the boundary of the City of Temecula ("City").
To fund its services and maintain improvements within its boundaries, the TCSD collects
rates and charges ("Charges"). The TCSD was formed, and Charges are set and
established, pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the
California Government Code.
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed,
revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting (Service Level B),
perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level C), trash/recycling collection
(Service Level D), and road improvement and maintenance (Service Level R) services
furnished by the TCSD, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the
tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with
and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code
Sections 61765,2 to 61765,6, inclusive, As required by these sections of the Government
Code, the TCSD Board approves an Annual Levy Report each year describing the
proposed rates and charges for that year,
B. This Report
This Initial Levy Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board pursuant to
Section 61621.2 of the Government Code to prescribe Rates and Charges beginning in FY
2003-2004 for the parcels and territory identified as Tract Map No, 23209,
The territory identified and described in this Report includes all parcels within the Tract
Map No, 23209, a future residential subdivision that consists of 80,01 gross acres of
vacant property located on the west side of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane
and north of Rancho California Road, with 220 planned residential units, The owner of
record (sole property owner) has requested that the TCSD establish the parcel charges
necessary to provide ongoing revenue for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping
and slope maintenance, and trash/recycling collection services within this future
residential subdivision,
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. Period Covered By Report
This Report describes rates and charges to be imposed for Fiscal Year 2003-2004, The
expectation of the TCSD is that these rates and charges will continue to be imposed on an
annual basis thereafter in connection with the TCSD's annual rate and charge levy
proceedings,
B. Parcels Affected By This Report
The rates and charges set forth in this Report shall affect all parcels included on Tract Map
No, 23209, recorded in Book P 1 of Parcel Maps, Pages 44 through 46 in the Office of the
Riverside County Recorder as No. 119017 recorded December 5, 1968.
C. Description of Service Levels
The proposed services to be provided to parcels within Tract Map No, 23209 include:
residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; and
trash/recycling collection.
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting - includes all developed single family
residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the TCSD provides on-going
servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements, The cost of
providing Service Level B services is $31.35 per residential parcel per year, meaning that
the cost of providing Service Level B services for the 220 parcels within Tract Map No.
23209 will be $6,897.00per year. However, in order to conform the rates and charges for
Tract Map No. 23209 with the rates and charges levied for Service Level B elsewhere
within the TCSD service area, only $5,649,60 per year of this cost will be recovered
through rates and charges levied against parcels within Tract Map No, 23209,
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance - includes all developed
single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels fOr which the TCSD
provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas
and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to and
associated with each development. The landscaped areas associated with this particular
development include, but are not limited to, perimeter slope and landscaping, as follows:
Within Tract 23209 the perimeter slopes within Lots 224 and 226 along Waleott Lane, the
perimeter slopes within Lot 225 and portions of Lots 223 and 222 along La Serena Way
and perimeter slopes within a portion of Lots 222 and 223 along Butterfield Stage Road.
There are two (2) off-site areas located between Butterfield Stage Road and Lot 95 and
between La Serena Way, Lot 225 and the bulb of Calle Elenita.
The cost of providing these services for these areas of slopes and landscaping is estimated
to be $44,000.00 per year,
Service Level D, Trash and Recycling Services - provides for the operation and
administration of the trash/recycling collection program including street sweeping services
for all single-family residential homes within the TCSD. The current cost of providing
these services to a single family residential home is $172,56 per year. Thus, the cost of
providing this service to the 220 parcels that have been identified as developed with a
residential home within Tract Map No, 23209 will be $37,963,20 per year,
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The cost to provide services within Tract Map No, 23209 will be fairly distributed among
each assessable property by the same methods and formulas applied to all parcels within
the various Service Levels of the TCSD.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's TCSD charges and is
applied to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter
Landscaping and Slope Maintenance); and Service Level D (Trash/Recycling Collection):
Total Balance to Levyrrotal Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
The following table reflects the levy calculation for each Service Level.
TABLE I
Proposed Service Level Charges
For Tract Map No, 23209
Estimated Budl!et and Charl!es for Fiscal Year 2003-2004
SERVICE LEVEL Total Levy Planned Charge Per
Budl!et LeVY Units LeVY Unit
Service Level B:
Residential Street Lighting $5,649,60 220 $25,68
Service Level C:
Local Landscaping and
Slopes $44,000,00 220 $200.00
Rate Level #8 (C-8)
Service Level D: $37,963,20 220 $172.56
Trash/recvclinl! Collection
The following tables (Table II through IV) show the methodology used to compute the
levy for each parcel affected by this Report,
TABLE II
Parcel Charge Calculation for
Service Level B
Parcel
Char e
$25,68
$25,68
A charge is imposed on all residential parcels developed or undeveloped, Parks, open
space areas, easements and non-buildable parcels are not charged,
TABLE III
Parcel Charge Calculation for
Service Level C
e
residential
vacant
Parcel
Char e
$200,00
$200,00
A charge is imposed on all residential parcels developed or undeveloped. Parks, open
space areas, easements and non-buildable parcels are not charged,
TABLE IV
Parcel Charge Calculation for
Service Level D
Parcel
e Char e
residential $172,56
This charge is imposed only on developed single-family residential parcels (with a
residential home),
APPENDIX A - PARCEL LISTING (FY 2003-2004)
The actual parcels subject to rates and charges for Service Level B, Service Level C and
Service Level D beginning Fiscal Year 2003-2004 shall be those parcels within Tract Map
No, 23209 identified on the Riverside County Secured Roll at the time all TCSb rates and
charges are submitted to the County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the tax roll for
that fiscal year.
The rates and method of apportionment outlined in this Report are consistent with the
rates and methods previously approved by the TCSD Board of Directors for each
applicable Service Level contained herein, However, all rates and methods described in
this Report are subject to revision and modification within the prescribed parameters of
the law, The actual rates and charges applied on the tax roll each fiscal year shall be
apportioned and submitted according to the rates and method described in the final TCSD
Annual Levy Report presented and approved by the Board of Directors at an annual Public
Hearing,
The following pages encompass a complete listing of all parcels within Tract Map No.
23209 subject to the TCSD Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D rates
and charges beginning Fiscal Year 2003-2004, This listing shows the rate and charge that
will be charged to each parcel based on development with a single family residential unit.
The rates and charges applied to each newly subdivided residential parcel will reflect the
services provided and the development of each respective parcel at the time the rates and
charges are applied.
Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Rates and Charges
Servi ce Service Service Total
Level B Level C Level D** Assessment
1 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
2 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
3 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
4 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
5 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
6 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
7 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
8 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
9 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
10 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
11 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
12 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
13 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
14 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
15 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
16 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
17 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
18 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
19 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
20 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
21 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
22 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
23 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
24 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
25 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
26 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
27 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
28 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
29 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
30 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
31 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
32 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
33 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
34 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
35 $25.68 $200.00 $172,56 $398.24
36 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
37 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
38 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
39 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
40 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
41 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
42 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
43 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
44 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
45 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
46 $25,68 $200.00 $172,56 $398,24
47 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
48 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
49 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
50 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
51 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
52 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
53 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
54 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
55 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
56 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
57 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
58 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
59 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
60 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
61 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
62 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
63 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
64 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
65 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
66 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
67 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
68 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
69 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
70 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
71 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
72 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
73 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
74 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
75 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
76 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
77 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
78 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
79 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
80 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
81 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
82 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
83 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
84 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
85 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
86 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
87 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
88 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
89 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
90 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
91 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
92 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
93 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
94 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
95 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
96 . $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
97 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
98 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
99 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
100 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
101 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
102 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
103 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
104 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
105 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
106 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
107 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
108 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
109 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
110 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
111 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
112 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
113 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
114 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
115 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
116 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
117 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
118 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
119 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
120 $25.68 $200,00 $172,56 $398,24
121 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
122 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
123 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
124 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
125 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
126 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
127 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
128 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
129 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
130 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
131 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
132 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
133 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
134 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
135 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
136 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
137 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
138 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
139 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
140 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
141 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
142 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
143 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
144 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
145 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
146 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
147 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
148 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
149 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
150 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
151 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
152 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
153 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
154 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
155 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
156 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
157 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
158 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
159 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
160 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
161 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
162 $25,68 $200,00 $172,56 $398,24
163 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
164 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
165 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
166 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
167 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
168 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
169 $25.68 $200,00 $172,56 $398,24
170 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
171 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
172 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
173 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
174 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
175 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
176 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
177 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
178 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
179 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
180 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
181 $25,68 $200,00 $172.56 $398,24
182 $25.68 $200,00 $172.56 $398.24
183 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
184 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
185 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
186 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
187 $25.68 $200.00 $172,56 $398,24
188 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
189 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
190 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
191 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
192 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
193 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
194 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
195 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
196 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
197 $25.68 $200.00 $172,56 $398,24
198 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
199 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
200 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
201 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
202 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
203 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
204 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
205 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
206 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
207 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
208 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
209 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
210 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
211 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
212 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
213 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398.24
214 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
215 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
216 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
217 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
218 $25,68 $200.00 $172,56 $398,24
219 $25,68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
220 $25.68 $200.00 $172.56 $398,24
Totals $5,649.60 $44,000.00 $37,963,20 $87,612.80
*Alllot numbers are by reference to Tract Map No, 23209 as recorded by the Riverside County
Office Recorder No. 2002-357382 recorded on June 28, 2002,
**Rates for Service Level D for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 may be increased by further action of the
City Council.
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA~E ""1171-
CITY MANAGER t.p rr~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Board of Directors
Herman D, Parker, Director of Community service~
September 17,2002
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Landscape Bonds and Agreements for Tract Map No,
29639; Harveston LLC
PREPARED BY:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
~\G7
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
1, Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Harveston, LLC to improve the perimeter
slopes and parkways along Date and Margarita Roads within Tract Map No. 29639,
2. Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Harveston, LLC to improve the landscaped
medians on Margarita, Date and Lakeview Roads within Tract Map No, 29639,
3, Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Harveston, LLC to improve the perimeter
slopes along the interior Loop Road within Tract Map No, 29639,
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the conditions of approval for Tract Map No, 29639,
Harveston, LLC is proposing to improve certain perimeter slopes and landscaped parkways adjacent
to Margarita and Date Roads, as well as the interior Loop Road along Harveston Drive and a small
segment of Village Road, In addition, the developer is proposing to improve and dedicate to the
TCSD landscaped medians along Margarita, Date and Lakeview Roads,
Once the landscaping is installed and the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) has
approved these landscaped areas TCSD will take over the maintenance responsibilities of the
proposed landscaped improvements within Tract Map No, 29639,
To insure that the slopes/parkways and landscaped medians are constructed to City standards, the
developer is normally required to post securities to improve these areas based upon the approved
landscape/irrigation plans and the certified construction cost estimates for the improvements, As of
this date, the final landscape plans for the medians on Date, Margarita and Lakeview Roads and the
parkways along Margarita and Date Roads have been through two plan checks and have been
tentatively approved, Since these plans do not have a final approval, TCSD has agreed to accept
the bonds in the amount of 125% of the landscape/irrigation improvement costs for these two areas.
R:\smithb\Bonds'Staff Tract 29639 Harveston.doc
The Interior Loop Road has been though one plan check and based on this status, TCSD has
agreed to accept the bonds in the amount of 200% of the initial landscape/irrigation improvement
costs,
As a result, Harveston, LLC has entered into an agreement with the City and has provided surety
bonds, issued by St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co, as follows:
Slopes and Parkwav Landscapinq Alonq Marqarita and Date Roads:
1. Faithful Performance Bond No. SV9730 in the amount of $365,800,00,
2, Labor and Materials Bond No, SV9730 in the amount of $182,900,00,
3. Warranty Bond No, SV9730 in the amount of $36,580,00,
Landscaped Medians
1, Faithful Performance Bond No, SV9731 the amount of $308,500,00,
2, Labor and Materials Bond No, SV9731 in the amount of $154,250,00,
3, Warranty Bond No, SV9731 in the amount of $30,850,00,
Interior Loop Road Alonq Harveston Drive and Villaqe Road
1. Faithful Performance Bond No, SV9729 in the amount of $471 ,000,00,
2. Labor and Materials Bond No, SV9729 in the amount of $235,500,00,
3. Warranty Bond No, SV9729 in the amount of $47,100,00,
Upon completion and acceptance of the improvements by the TCSD, staff will recommend the
appropriate release or reduction of the bonds,
FISCAL IMPACT: None, The cost of construction for the perimeter slope areas and
medians will be borne by the developer,
ATTACHMENTS:
Vicinity Map
Project Map
Agreement/Bonds,
R:\smithb\Bonds\Staff Tract 29639 Harveston.doc
~
~
~
Vj
~
~
/......"'f
~
~
~
I-
U
~~
o CiS
~
o~~
~
'\~
~:\. ~
0tf. " "
~~~r;~i ~ -.:-
"~O;-, ~ -
~, ,oJ
~'~'--=J ~
" ~
,
,
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
a..
<( w
~ ...J
<1:
~ U
([J
0
-
Z f-
- f-
(J 0
z
-
>
I Ii
Il
j ~
I Eh.
, I I
III
iL IE.
I I
I
I
___-=L_
-.....-
h800 am.aw. DrIft
MIilIdaq...jD.Cdlfonaia It2fi1
,
i
i
I
.
f
i
i
_ TEMECUlA COMMUNITY SERVICES DIS1llICT lTCSDl - 40\188 SF
!STREET AND SLOPE IAAlNTENANCEl
lHARVESTON COMIMITY lMD - LEVa Ol
f
I
.
I.8nnar Communltlea
I
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
MEDIAN/PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
HARVESTON PROJECT
DATE OF AGREEMENT: September 9, 2002
NAME OF SUBDIVIDER:. Harveston, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company
(Referred to as "SUBDIVIDER")
NAME OF SUBDIVISION:
. Harveston
TRACT NO.:
29639
TENTATIVE MAP RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO.:
(Referred to as "Resolution of Approval")
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF MEDIANIPARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS:
($ .00) $1 , 1 45 , 300
One million, one hundred forty-five thousand, three hundred dollars
COMPLETION DATE: QIC>3
NAME OF SURETY AND BONO NO. FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS BONO:
st. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.
SV 9729 $235,500; SV 9730 $182,900; SV 9731 $154,250
NAME OF SURETY AND BONO NO. FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BONO:
st. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.
SV 9729$471,000; SV 9730 $365,800; SV 9731 $308,500
NAME OF SURETY AND BONO NO. FOR WARRANTY BONO:
st. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.
SV 9729 $47.100; SV 9730 $36,580; SV 9731 $30,850
704981,1 8/24/02
1
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Temecula,
California, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as
CITY, and Harveston, LLC" a Delaware limited liability company (the "SUBDIVIDER").
RECITALS
A, SUBDIVIDER has presented to CITY for approval and recordation, a final
subdivision map of a proposed subdivision pursuant to provisions of the Subdivision Map
Act of the State of California and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the
filing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps, The Subdivision Map Act and the
CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the filing, approval and recordation of
subdivision maps are collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Subdivision
Laws,"
B, A tentative map of the SUBDIVISION has been approved, subject to the
Subdivision Laws and to the requirements and conditions contained in the Resolution of
Approval. The Resolution of Approval is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and is
incorporated into this Agreement by reference,
C, SUBDIVIDER is required, as a condition of the approval of the tentative
map, to submit Median/Parkway Improvement plans to the City for approval by the City
and to complete the approved Median/Parkway Improvement by the Completion Date.
The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a final map,
that the SUBDIVIDER has entered into a secured Agreement with the CITY to complete
the Median/Parkway Improvements within the Completion Date,
0, In consideration of approval of a final map for the SUBDIVISION by the
City Council, SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into this Agreement, whereby Subdivider
promises to install and complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the
Median/Parkway Improvement work required by City in connection with proposed
subdivision, Subdivider has secured this agreement by Median/Parkway/Landscaping
704981.1 8/24/02
2
Improvement Security required by the Subdivision Laws and approved by the City
Attorney. The term "Median/Parkway" includes landscape areas, other than parks, lakes
and the lake park,. as designated on the Median/Parkway Improvement Plans to be
maintained by the Temecula Community Services District,
E, Complete Median/Parkway Improvement Plans for the construction,
installation and completion of the Median/Parkway Improvements have been prepared
by SUBDIVIDER and submitted to the City for approval by the Director of Community
Services pursuant to Section 1 of this Agreement.
F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the proposed Median/Parkway
Improvements according to the Improvement Plans submitted to the City for approval
has been made and approved by the Director of Community Services, The estimated
amount is stated on Page 1 of this Agreement. The basis for the estimate is attached as
Exhibit "A" to this Agreement based on the preliminary plans submitted to the City and
includes a twenty five percent (25%) contingency to accommodate an changes in the
plans which may be required by the City as part of the final approval..
G, The CITY has adopted standards for the construction and installation of
Median/Parkway Improvements within the CITY, The Median/Parkway Improvement
Plans shall be in conformance with the CITY standards, (in effect on the date of approval
of the Resolution of Approval),
H, SUBDIVIDER recognizes that by approval of the final map for
SUBDIVISION, CITY has conferred substantial rights upon SUBDIVIDER, including the
right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the SUBDIVISION, and has taken the final act
necessary to subdivide the properly within the SUBDIVISION, As a result, CITY will be
damaged to .the extent of the cost of installation of the Median/Parkway Improvements
by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform its obligation under this Agreement, including, but
not limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S obligation to complete construction of Median/Parkway
704981 ,1 8/24/02
3
Improvements by the Completion Date, CITY shall be entitled to all remedies available
to it pursuant to this Agreement and the Subdivision Laws in the event of a default by
SUBDIVIDER. It is specifically recognized that the determination of whether a reversion
to acreage or rescission of the SUBDIVISION constitutes an adequate remedy for
default by the SUBDIVIDER shall be within the sole discretion of CITY.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the approval and recordation by the City
Council of the final map of the SUBDIVISION, SUBDIVIDER and CITY agree as follows:
1. SUBDIVIDER'S Obliaations to Construct Median/Parkwav Improvements,
SUBDIVIDER Shall:
a, Comply with all the requirements of the Resolution of
Approval, and any amendments thereto, and with the provisions of the
Subdivision Laws,
b, Pursuant to the requirements of Labor Code Section
1720, SUBDIVIDER shall pay prevailing wages for all work performed for
the construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair for the
Median/Parkway Improvement Work required by this Agreement. In
accordance with the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime
work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman
needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of
Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Cleric Copies
may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of the City of Temecula,
Subdivider shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall
pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum, Subdivider shall
comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5,
704981,1 8/24/02
4
1777,6, and 1813 of the Labor Code and other applicable laws and
regulations with respect to the payment of prevailing wages, Pursuant to
the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Subdivider shall forfeit to the
City, as a penalty, the sum of $25,00 for each calendar day, or portion
thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less, than
the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by
it or by any subcontractor under it, in violation of the provisions of the
Agreement or in violation of any applicable laws or regulations pertaining
to the payment of prevailing wages.
c, Prepare and submit to the City Median/Parkway
Improvement Plans for the construction, installation and completion of the
Median/Parkway Improvements, The Median/Parkway Improvement
Plans shall be approved, conditionally approved, or rejected by the
Director of Community Services pursuant to this Agreement. If rejected,
the Subdivider shall resubmit the Plans with such changes as may be
required by the Director of Community Services, Once approved by the
Director of Community Services, the Median/Parkway Improvement Plans
numbered as referenced previously in this Agreement shall be placed on
file in the Office of the Director of Community Services and are
incorporated into this Agreement by this reference, All references in this
Agreement to the "Median/Parkway Improvement Plans" or
"Median/Parkway Improvements" shall include reference to the
Median/Parkway improvement plans and any specifications for the
Improvements as approved by the Director of Community Services,
d, Complete by the time established in Section 20 of this
Agreement and at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the Median/Parkway
704981.1 8/24/02
5
Improvement work required on the Tentative Map and Resolution of
Approval in conformance with the Median/Parkway Improvement Plans
and the CITY standards:
d, Furnish the necessary materials for completion of the
Median/Parkway Improvements in conformity with the Median/Parkway
Improvement Plans and CITY standards.
e. Except for easements or other interested in real property to
be dedicated to the Homeowners Association of the SUBDIVISION,
acquire and dedicate, or pay the cost of acquisition by CITY, of all rights-
of-way, easements and other interests in real property for construction or
installation of the Median/Parkway Improvements, free and clear of all
liens and encumbrances for the SUBDIVIDER'S obligations with regard to
acquisition by CITY 01 oft-site rights-ol-way, easements and other
interests in real property shall be subject to a separate Agreement
between SUBDIVIDER and CITY,
2, Acauisition and Dedication of Easements or Riahts-of-Wav, If any of the
Median/Parkway Improvements and land development work contemplated by this
Agreement are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no
construction or installation shall be commenced before:
a. The ofter of dedication to CITY or appropriate rights-of-
way, easements or other interest in real property, and appropriate
authorization from the property owner to allow construction or installation
of the Improvements or work, or
b. The dedication to, and acceptance by, the CITY of
appropriate rights-of-way, easements or other interests in real property,
704981,1 8/24/02
6
and approved by the Department of Public Works, as determined by the
Director of Community Services,
c, The issuance by a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant
to the State Eminent Domain Law of an order of possession,
SUBDIVIDER shall comply in all respects with order of possession.
Nothing in this Section 2 shall be construed as authorizing or granting an extension of
time to SUBDIVIDER.
3,
Securitv,
SUBDIVIDER shall at all times guarantee SUBDIVIDER'S.
performance of this Agreement by furnishing to CITY, and maintaining, good and
sufficient security as required by the Subdivision Laws on forms approved by CITY for
the purposes and in the amounts as follows:
a, to assure faithful performance of this Agreement in regard
to said improvements in and amount of one hundred percent (100%) of
the estimated cost of the Median/Parkway Improvements; and
\
b, to secure payment to any contractor, subcontractor,
persons renting equipment, or furnishing labor materials for
Median/Parkway Improvements required to be constructed or installed
pursuant to this Agreement in the additional amount of fifty percent (50%)
of the estimated cost of the Improvements; and
c, to guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant to this
Agreement for a period of one year following acceptance thereof by CITY
against any defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished
in the additional amount of ten percent (10%) of the estimated cost of the
Median/Parkway Improvements,
The securities required by this Agreement shall be kept on file with the City Clerk. The
terms of the security documents referenced on Page 1 of this Agreement are
704981.1 8/24/02
7
incorporated into this Agreement by this Reference, If any security is replaced by
another approved security, the replacement. shall be filed with the City Clerk and, upon
filing, shall be deemed to have been made a part of and incorporated into this
Agreement. Upon filing of a replacement security with the City Clerk, the former security
may be released,
4, Alterations to Median/Parkwav Imorovement Plans,
a, Any changes, alterations or additions to the
Median/Parkway Improvement Plans and specifications or to the
improvements, not exceeding ten (10%) of the original estimated cost if
the improvement, which are mutually agreed upon by the CITY and
SUBDIVIDER, shall not relieve the improvement security given for faithful
performance of this Agreement. In the event such changes, alterations,
or additions exceed 10% of the original estimated cost of the
improvement, SUBDIVIDER shall provide improvement security for
faithful performance as required by Paragraph 3 of this Agreement for
100% of the total estimated cost of the improvement as changed, altered,
or amended, minus any completed partial releases allowed by Paragraph
6 of this Agreement.
b, The SUBDIVIDER shall construct the Median/Parkway
Improvements in accordance with the CITY Standards in effect at the time
of adoption of the Resolution of Approval. CITY reserves the right to
modify the standards applicable to the SUBDIVISION and this
Agreement, when necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare
or comply with applicable State or federal law or CITY zoning ordinances,
If SUBDIVIDER requests and is granted an extension of time for
704981 ,1 8/24/02
8
completion of the improvements, CITY may apply the standards in effect
at the time of the extension,
5, Insoection and Maintenance Period.
a, SUBDIVIDI;:R shall obtain City inspection of the
Median/Parkway Improvements in accordance with the City standards in
effect at the time of adoption of the Resolution of Approval. SUBDIVIDER
shall at all times maintain proper facilities and safe access for inspection
of the Median/Parkway Improvements by CITY inspectors and to the
shops wherein any work is in preparation, Upon completion of the work
the SUBDIVIDER may request a final inspection by the Director of
Community Services, or the Director of Community Service's authorized
representative. If the Director of Community Services, or the designated
representative, determine that the work has been completed in
accordance with this Agreement, then the Director of Community
Services shall certify the completion of the Median/Parkway
Improvements to the Board of Directors,
b, SUBDIVIDER shall continue to maintain the
Median/Parkway Improvements for ninety (90) days after they have been
certified completed, No improvements shall be finally accepted unless
the maintenance period has expired, and all aspects of the work have
been inspected and determined to have been completed in accordance
with the Median/Parkway Improvement Plans and CITY standards.
SUBDIVIDER shall bear all costs of inspection and certification,
6. Release of Securities, Subject to approval by the Board of Directors of the
Community Services District of the CITY, the securities required by this Agreement shall .
be released as follows:
704981,1 8/24/02
9
704981 ,1 8/24/02
10
other obligations secured by the Security. The balance of the security
shall be released upon the settlement of all claims and obligations for
which the security was given,
d, No security given for the guarantee or warranty of work
shall be released until the expiration of the warranty period and until any
claims filed during the warranty period have been settled, As provided in
paragraph 10, the warranty period shall not commence until final
acceptance of all work and improvements by the City Council.
e, The CITY may retain from any security released, and
amount sufficient to cover costs and reasonable expenses and fees,
including reasonable attorney's fees,
7, Iniurv to Public Improvements, Public Propertv or Public Utilities Facilities,
SUBDI\fIDER shall replace or have replaced, or repair or have repaired, as the case
may be, all public improvements, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision
monuments which are destroyed or damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done
under this Agreement. SUBDIVIDER shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repairs
of any and all public property on public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason
of any work done, Under this agreement whether such property is owned by the United
States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political
subdivision thereof, or by the CITY or any public or private utility corporation or by any
combination or such owners, Any repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and
subject to the approval, of the City Engineer,
8, Permits, SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER'S expense, obtain all
necessary permits and licenses for the construction and installation of the
improvements, give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law,
9, Default of SUBDIVIDER
704981 ,1 8/24/02
11
a, default of SUBDIVIDER shall include, but not be
limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely commence construction
pursuant to this Agreement; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely commence
construction of the Median/Parkway Improvements; SUBDIVIDER'S
failure to timely cure the defect in the Median/Parkway Improvements;
SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform substantial construction work for a
period of 20 calendar days after commencement of the work;
SUBDIVIDER'S insolvency, appointment of a receiver, or the filing of any
petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or involuntary which SUBDIVIDER
fails to discharge within thirty (30) days; the commencement of a
foreclosure action against the SUBDIVISION or a portion thereof, or any
conveyance in lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or SUBDIVIDER'S
failure to perform any other obligation under this Agreement.
b. The CITY reserves to itself all remedies available to it at
law or in equity for breach of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this
Agreement. The CITY shall have the right, subject to his section, to draw
upon or utilize the appropriate security to mitigate CITY damages in event
of default by SUBDIVIDER. The right of CITY to draw upon or utilize the
security is additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to
CITY. It is specifically recognized that the estimated costs and security
amounts may not reflect the actual cost of construction or installation of
Median/Parkway Improvements and, therefore, CITY damages for
SUBDIVIDER'S default shall be measured by the cost of completing the
required improvements. The sums provided by the improvement security
may be used by CITY for the completion of the Median/Parkway
Improvements in accordance with the Median/Parkway Improvement
704981,1 8/24/02
12
'-
Plans and specifications contained herein, In the event of
SUBDIVIDER'S default under this Agreement, SUBDIVIDER authorizes
CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after mailing written notice of
default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER'S Surety, and agrees to pay
the entire cost of such performance by CITY. CITY may take over the.
work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other
method CITY may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of
SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDIVIDER'S Surety shall be liable to CITY for an
excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and, in such event,
CITY without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in
completing the work, such materials, appliances, plan and other property
belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work and
necessary for performance of the work,
c, Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this
Agreement shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a notice of
violation against all the lots in the SUBDIVISION, or to rescind the
approval or otherwise revert the SUBDIVISION to acreage. The remedy
provided by this Subsection C is in addition to and not in lieu of other
remedies available to CITY, SUBDIVIDER agrees that the choice of
remedy or remedies for SUBDIVIDER'S breach shall be in the discretion
of CITY.
d, In the event that SUBDIVIDER fails to perform any
obligation hereunder, SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay all costs and expenses
incurred by CITY in securing performance of such obligations, including
costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees,
704981,1 8/24/02
13
e, The failure of CITY to take an enforcement action with
respect to a default, or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a
waiver of that default or breach or any subsequent default or breach of
SUBDIVIDER.
10. Warranty, SUBDIVIDER shall guarantee or warranty the work
done pursuant this Agreement for a period of one. year after expiration of the
maintenance period and final acceptance by the City Council of the work and
improvements against any defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished,
Where Median/Parkway Improvements are to be constructed in phases or sections, the
one year warranty period shall commence after CITY acceptance of the last completed
improvement. If within the warranty period any work or improvement or part of any work
or improvement done, furnished, installed, constructed or caused to be done, furnished,
installed or constructed by SUBDIVIDER fails to fulfill any of the requirements of this
Agreement or the Median/Parkway Improvement Plans and specifications referred to
herein, SUBDIVIDER shall without delay and without any cost to CITY, repair or replace
or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or
structure, Should SUBDIVIDER fail to act promptly or in accordance with this
requirement, SUBDIVIDER hereby authorizes CITY, at CITY option, to perform the work
twenty days after mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to
SUBDIVIDER'S Surety and agrees to pay the cost of such w~rk by CITY, Should CITY .
determine that an urgency requires repairs or replacements to be made before
SUBDIVIDER can be notified, CITY may, in its sole discretion, make the necessary
repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and SUBDIVIDER shall pay to
CITY the cost of such repairs,
704981,1 8/24/02
14
11. Subdivider Not Aaent of Citv, Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of
SUBDIVIDER'S agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in
connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this Agreement.
12,
Iniurv to Work,
Until such time as the Median/Parkway
Improvements are accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for and bear
the risk of loss to any of the improvements constructed or installed, CITY shall not, nor
-
shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or
damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to the work or improvements
specified in this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the work or
improvements, All such risks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby assumed by
SUBDIVIDER.
13, Other Aareements, Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude
CITY from expending monies pursuant to agreements concurrently or previously
executed between the parties, or from entering into agreement with other subdividers for
the apportionment of costs of water and sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant
to the provisions of the CITY ordinances providing therefore, nor shall anything in this
Agreement commit CITY to any such apportionment.
14, SUBDIVIDER'S Obliaation to Warn Public Durina Construction. Until
final acceptance of the Median/Parkway Improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall give good
and adequate warning to the public of each and every dangerous condition existent in
said improvements, and will take all reasonable actions to protect the public from such
dangerous condition,
15,
Vestina of Ownership.
Upon acceptance of work on behalf of CITY
and recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed
pursuant to this Agreement shall vest in CITY.
704981,1 8/24/02
15
16. Final Acceptance of Work, Acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY
shall be made by the City Council upon recommendation of the Director of Community
Services after final completion and inspection of all Median/Parkway Improvements,
The Board of Directors shall act upon the Director of Community Services
recommendations within thirty (30) days from the date the Director of Community
Services certifies that the work has finally completed, as provided in Paragraph 5. Such
acceptance shall not constitute a waiver of defects by CITY,
17. IndemnitvlHold Harmless. CITY or any officer or employee thereof
shall not be liable for any injury to persons or property occasioned by reason of the acts
or omissions of SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this
Agreement. SUBDIVIDER further agrees to protect and hold harmless CITY, its officials
'and employees from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, liability or loss of
any sort, because of, or arising out of, acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER, its agents or
employees in the performance of this Agreement, including all claims, demands, causes
of action, liability, or loss because of, or arising out of, in whole or in part, the -design or
construction of the Median/Parkway Improvements, This indemnification and Agreement
to hold harmless shall extend to injuries to persons and damages or taking of property
resulting from the design or construction of the Median/Parkway Improvements as
provided herein, and in addition, to adjacent property owners as a consequence of the
diversion of waters from the design or construction of public drainage systems, streets
and other public improvements, Acceptance of any of the Median/Parkway
Improvements shall not constitute any assumption by the CITY of any responsibility for
any damage or taking covered by this paragraph, CITY shall not be responsible for the
design or construction of the Median/Parkway Improvements pursuant to the approved
Median/Parkway Improvement Plans, regardless of any negligent action or inaction
taken by the CITY in approving the plans, unless the particular improvement design was
704981 ,1 8/24/02
16
specifically required by CITY over written objection by SUBDIVIDER submitted to the
Director of Community Services before approval of the particular improvement design,
which objection indicated that the particular improvement design was dangerous or
defective and suggested an alternative safe and feasible design, After acceptance of
the Median/Parkway Improvements, the SUBDIVIDER shall remain obligated to
eliminate any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by the design or
. construction defect, however, SUBDIVIDER shall not be responsible for routine
maintenance. Provisions of this paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten
years following the acceptance by the CITY of Median/Parkway Improvements, It is the
intent of this section that SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for all liability for design and
construction of the Median/Parkway Improvements installed or work done pursuant to
this Agreement and .the CITY shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfeasance,
misfeasance or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans
or specifications or in approving, reviewing or inspecting any work or construction. The
improvement security shall not be required to cover the provision of this paragraph,
18, Sale or Disoosition of SUBDIVISION, Sale or other disposition of
this property will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the obligations set forth herein, If
SUBDIVIDER sells the property or any portion of the property within the SUBDIVISION
to any other person, the SUBDIVIDER may request a novation of this Agreement and a
substitution of security, Upon approval of the novation and substitution of securities, the
SUBDIVIDER may request a release or reduction of the securities required by this
Agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve the SUBDIVIDER of the obligations
under Paragraph 17 for the work or improvement done by SUBDIVIDER.
19, Time of the Essence, Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
20, Time for Comoletion of Work Extensions, SUBDIVIDER shall complete
construction of the improvements required by this Agreement no later than September 9,
704981,1 8/24/02
17
2003, In the event good cause exists as determined by the City Engineer, and if
otherwise permitted under the tentative map condition, the time for completion of the
improvements hereunder may be extended, The extension shall be made by writing
executed by the Director of Community Services. Any such extension may be granted
without notice to SUBDIVIDER'S Surety and shall not affect the validity .of this
Agreement or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given for this Agreement.
The Director of Community Services shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or
not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension, Delay, other
than delay in the commencement of work, resulting from an act of CITY, or by an act of
God, which SUBDIVIDER could not have reasonably foreseen, or by storm or inclement
weather which prevents the conducting of work, or by strikes, boycotts, similar actions by
employees or labor organizations, which prevent the conducting or work, and which
were not caused by or contributed to by SUBDIVIDER, shall constitute good cause for
an extension of time for completion, As a condition of such extension, the Director of
Community Services may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing
performance of this Agreement as extended in an increased amount as necessary to
compensate for an increase in construction costs as determined by the Director of
Community Services,
21, No Vestina of Riahts, Performance by SUBDIVIDER of this
Agreement shall not be construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S rights with respect to any
change in any change in any zoning or building law or ordinance,
22. Notices, All notices required or provided for under this Agreement
shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and
addressed as provided in this Section, Notice shall be effective on the date it is
delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail.
704981,1 8/24/02
18
Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change of address is filed with the
City:
Notice to CITY:
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P,O, Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Notice to SUBDIVIDER:
Harveston LLC
24800 Chrisanta Drive
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
23. . Severabilitv, The provisions of this Agreement are severable, If any
portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the
remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or
modified by the mutual consent of the parties.
24,
Captions,
The captions of this Agreement are for convenience and
reference only and shall not define, explain, modify, limit, exemplify, or aid in the
interpretation, construction or meaning of any provisions of this Agreement.
25,
Litiaation or Arbitration,
In the event that suit or arbitration is brought
to enfo~ce the terms of this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to litigation
costs and reasonable attorney's fees,
26,
Incorporation of Recitals,
The recitals to this agreement are hereby
incorporated into the terms of this agreement.
27,
Leaal Responsibilities,
The Subdivider shall keep itself informed of
all local, State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its obligations pursuant to this
704981,1 8/24/02
19
Agreement. The Subdivider shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and
regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity occasioned by failure of the Subdivider to comply with this section,
28, Entire Aareement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of
the parties with respect to the subject matter, All modifications, amendments, or
waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate
representative of the parties. In the case of the CITY, the appropriate party shall be the
City Manager.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by CITY, by and through
. its Mayor,
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W, Jones, CMC, City Clerk
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
William Hughes, City Engineer
Herman Parker, Director of
Community Services
704981,1 8/24/02
20
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M, Thorson
City Attorney
SUBDIVIDER
\ .. """"'\.
By:
.... --- ,
Name: Tom Banks
Title: Vice President
By:
~~
Name:
Dee Baker
Title:
Assistant Secretary
(Proper Notarization of
SUBDIVIDER'S signature is
required and shall be attached)
704981.1 8/24/02
21
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Olf' /I~C;;E
}
}
On. BE!",. II
personally appeared
V personally kno,wn to me -OR- .
11 proved.to me n the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the pers~whose
nam. subscribed to the wit~~=nt and acknowledged to me that
e ecuted the same in h' uthorized capacitY~, and that
by , ei signatur~ the instrument the pers~ or the entity upon
behalf of w ich the pers~cted, executed the instrument.
,2002 before me, .:1#NfeG L ,ZL/t,(Er
Witness my hand and official seal.
J ~ JANICE l. ZlAKET ~
- Comm, # 1228574
Ul . NOTARY PUBLIC ,CALifORNIA ~
Orlngl Counly
My Comm, bpl," Jul 11,2001'"
~ c,~
~ V __ -'---' X:'-
NATURE OF NO Y
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of
}
}
On
, personally appeared
, 2002 before me,
[] personally known to me -OR-
[] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s} whose
name(s} is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that
by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
704981.1 8/24/02
22
E)(IJ~jt A1
Harveston Parkway Slopes CSD02-0019
01-153
BUDGET ESTIMATE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
PLANTING
TREES 36" BOX EA. 600.00 0.00
24" BOX 190.00 EA. 225.00 42,750.00
15 GAL 642.00 EA. 75.00 48,150.00
SHRUBS 5 GAL 4,510.00 EA. 16,00 72,160.00
1 GAL 838.00 EA. 5.00 4,190.00
JUTE NETTING S.F. 0.12 0.00
LAWN HYDRO SEED 40,397.00 S.F. 0.10 4,039.70
SOIL CLEARlWEED 153,627.00 S.F. 0.03 4,608.81
GRADFJAMEND S.F. 0.10 0.00
BARK 113,230.00 S.F. 0.15 16,984.50
CONCRETE MOW STRIP 409.00 L.F. 2.95 1,206.55
PLANTING SUB-TOTAL 194,089,56
IRRIGATION
KBI CHECK VALVE 2.00 EA. 7.50 15.00
CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY 2.00 EA. 5,000.00 10,000.00
BASKET STRNR 1 INCH 2.00 EA. 200.00 400.00
R.c.v. 1 INCH 14.00 EA. 35.00 490.00
11/2 INCH 28.00 EA. 40.00 1,120.00
RAlNBIRD PRS REG 3/4 14.00 EA. 12.00 168.00
API WYE STRNR 14.00 EA. 20.00 280.00
QUICK COUPLER 56.00 EA. 30.00 1,680.00
API END FLUSH CAP 74.00 EA. 3.50 259.00
RVALVE 2 INCH 5.00 EA. 30.00 150.00
BOWSMITH EMITTER 7,702.00 EA. 0.90 6,931.80
RAlNBIRD RAIN GUAGE EA. 42.00 0.00
MASTER VALVE 2 INCH 2.00 EA. 150.00 300.00
FLOW METER 2 INCH 2.00 EA. 525.00 1,050.00
RAlNBIRD 6 POP-UP 1,653.00 EA. 6.00 9,918.00
MAIN 2 INCH 5,436.00 L.F. 2.25 12,231.00
1 INCH 100.00 L.F, 1.25 125.00
LATERAL 2 INCH 250.00 L.F. 2.25 562.50
1-1/2 INCH 250.00 L.F. 1.60 400.00
1-1/4 INCH 250.00 L.F. 1.40 350.00
1 INCH 500.00 L.F 1.20 600.00
3/4 INCH 23,747.00 L.F. 1.05 24,934.35
IRRIGATION SUBTOTAL 71,949,65
PLANTING AND IRRIGATION TOTAL 266,039,21
MAINTENANC /MONTH 153,627.00 S.F. 0.015 2,304.41
PER YEAR 27,652.86
01-153 C.B. Parkway Slopes
08/16/02
Harveston Parkway Slopes CSD02-0019
01-153
WATER BUDGET
PROCESS STEP (I) (2) (3)
NUMBER DRIP SHRUB SPRAY LAWN SPRAY
HYDROZONE
NUMBER
ETORATE (I) 55.45 55.45 55.45
(IN.NR)
(TABLE NO. I)
AREA OF HYDROZONE (2) 113,230.00 0,00 40,397.00
(SQ,FT.)
PLANT COEFFICIENT (3) 0.30 0.30 0,70
(TABLE NO.4) ,
IRRlGATION (4) 0.90 0.70 0.70
DISTRIBUTION
EFFICIENCY
(TABLE NO,2)
IRRlGATION (5) 0.85 0.85 0,85
OPERATION
EFFICIENCY
(TABLE NO, 3)
YEARLY (6) 16.64 16,64 38,82
WATER DEMAND
(STEP #1 xSTEP #3)
(IN.NR)
TOTAL WATER (7) 156,337.23 0,00 130,144,79
DEMAND (0,083
xSTEP #2
xSTEP #6) (CU. FT.)
IRRlGATION EFFICIENC (8) 0,72 0.77 0.60
(STEP #4 x STEP #5)
HYDROZONE WATER (9) 217,135.04 0.00 218,730.74
DEMAND(STEP #7 / STEP
#8 (CU,FT.)
--------------------------------------------
565,636.18 Allowable Project Demand (Step #10)
(0.083 x 0.8 x Step #1 x total of all
Step #2's),
435,865.78 Total of all water demands,
08/16/02
Harveston Parkway Slopes CSD02-0019
01-153
DRIP
ETO %ETO CU,FT. GALLONS DAYS GPM MINIDA Y
JANUARY 2.10 0,04 8,223.33 61,510.50 10.00 128.37 48
FEBRUARY 2,75 0,05 10,768,64 80,549.46 13.00 128,37 48
MARCH 3.90 0.07 15,271.90 114,233,78 18.00 128.37 49
APRIL 4.40 0.08 17,229.83 128,879.14 21.00 128.37 48
MAY 5,90 0,11 23,103,64 172,815,21 31.00 128.37 43
JUNE 7.40 0.13 28,977.44 216,751.28 30.00 128.37 56
JULY 7.60 0.14 29,760.62 222,609.43 31.00 128.37 56
AUGUST 7,00 0,13 27,41 I.IO 205,035,00 30.00 128.37 53
SEPTEMBER 5.80 0.10 22,712.05 169,886.14 26,00 128.3 7 51
OCTOBER 3.90 0.07 15,271.90 114,233.78 20,00 128.37 44
NOVEMBER 2,60 0,05 10,181.26 76,155.86 12.00 128.37 49
DECEMBER 2.10 0.04 8223,33 61,510.50 10,00 128,37 48
------------------------
55.45 1.00 217,135.04
CU.FT,
CU,FT./GAL,
217,135.04
7.48
OB/16102
Harveston Parkway Slopes CSD02-0019
01-153
LAWN
ETo KC ETc PR MlM DIM MID
JANUARY 2.10 0.70 1.47 1.50 59 6 10
FEBRUARY 2.75 0.70 1.93 1.50 77 8 10
MARCH 3.90 0.70 2.73 1.50 109 12 9
APRIL 4.40 0.70 3.08 1.50 123 13 9
MAY 5.90 0.70 4.13 1.50 165 17 10
JUNE 7.40 0,70 5.18 1.50 207 22 9
JULY 7.60 0.70 5.32 1.50 213 22 10
AUGUST 7.00 0.70 4.90 1.50 196 22 9
SEPTEMBER 5.80 0.70 4.06 1.50 162 18 9
OCTOBER 3.90 0.70 2.73 1.50 109 12 9
NOVEMBER 2.60 0.70 1.82 1.50 73 8 9
DECEMBER 2.10 0.70 1.47 1.50 59 6 10
TOTAL 55.45
NOTE: Daily run time will have to be increased
during the plant establishment period.
ETo Reference Evapotranspiration
KC Crop Coefficient
ETc Crop Evapotranspiration
PR Precipitation Rate
M/M Minutes per Month
DIM Days per Month
MID Minutes per Day
OB/16/02
E)(J..;/oif A2
Harveston Medians CSD02-0015
01-153
BUDGET ESTIMATE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
PLANTING
TREES 24" BOX 67.00 EA. 225.00 15,075.00
SHRUBS 5 GAL 681.00 EA. 16.00 10,896.00
I GAL 689.00 EA. 5.00 3,445.00
SOIL CLEARlWEED 50,101.00 S.F. 0.03 1,503.03
GRADE/AMEND o S.F. 0.10 5,010.10
BARK 50,101.00 S.F. 0.15 7,515.15
CONCRETE MOW STRIP L.F, 2.95 0.00
PLANTING SUB-TOTAL 43,444,28
IRRIGATION
KBI CHECK VALVE 6.00 EA. 7.50 45.00
CONTROLER ASSEMBLY 1.00 EA. 5,000.00 5,000.00
BASKETSTRNR I INCH 1.00 EA. 200.00 200.00
R.C.V. I INCH 3.00 EA. 35.00 105.00
RAINBIRD PRS REG 3/4 3.00 EA. 12.00 36.00
API WYE STRNR 3.00 EA. 20.00 60.00
QUICK COUPLER 18.00 EA. 30.00 540.00
API END FLUSH CAP 12.00 EA. 3.50 42.00
BVALVE 2 INCH 2.00 EA. 30.00 60.00
BOWSMITH EMITTER 1,575.00 EA. 0.90 1,417.50
RAINBIRD RAIN GUAGE EA. 42.00 0.00
MASTER VALVE 2 INCH 1.00 EA. 150.00 150.00
FLOW METER I INCH 1.00 EA. 400.00 400.00
RAINBIRD BUBBLERS EA. 1.00 0.00
MAIN 2 INCH 930.00 L.F. 2.25 2,092.50
I INCH 494.00 L.F. 1.25 617.50
LATERAL 1-1/2 INCH L.F. 1.60 0.00
1-1/4 INCH 2.00 L.F. 1.40 2.80
I INCH L.F 1.20 0.00
3/4 INCH 3,048.00 L.F. 1.05 3,200.40
IRRIGATION SUBTOTAL 13,923,70
PLANTING AND IRRIGATION TOTAL 57,367.98
MAINTENANC /MONTH
50,101.00 S.F.
0.015 751.52
PER YEAR 9,018.18
* Controller "J" separate from this estimate
01-153 c.E. Medians
08116/02
Harveston Medians CSD02-0015
01-153
WATER BUDGET
PROCESS STEP (I) (2) (3)
NUMBER DRIP SHRUB SPRAY LAWN SPRAY
HYDROZONE
NUMBER
ETO RATE (I) 55.45 55.45 55.45
(IN./YR)
(TABLE NO. I)
AREA OF HYDROZONE (2) 50,101.00 0.00 0,00
(SQ,FT,)
PLANT COEFFICIENT (3) 0.30 0.30 0.70
(TABLE NO, 4)
IRRIGATION (4) 0.90 0,70 0.70
DISTRIBUTION
EFFICIENCY
(TABLE NO,2)
IRRIGATION (5) 0,85 0.85 0.85
OPERATION
EFFICIENCY
(TABLE NO, 3)
YEARLY (6) 16,64 16.64 38,82
WATER DEMAND
(STEP #1 xSTEP #3)
(IN./YR)
TOTAL WATER (7) 69,174,70 0.00 0,00
DEMAND (0,083
xSTEP #2
xSTEP #6) (CD. FT.)
IRRIGATION EFFICIENC (8) 0.72 0,77 0.60
(STEP #4 x STEP #5)
HYDROZONE WATER (9) 96,075,97 0,00 0,00
DEMAND(STEP #7 I STEP
#8 (CD.FT.)
--------------------------------------------
184,465.87 Allowable Project Demand (Step #10)
(0,083 x 0.8 x Step #1 x total of all
Step #2's).
96,075.97 Total of all water demands.
08/16/02
.
Harveston Medians CSD02-0015
01-153
DRIP
ETO %ETO cu. FT, GALLONS DAYS GPM MINIDA Y
JANUARY 2,10 0,04 3,638.59 27,216,62 7.00 26,25 148
FEBRUARY 2.75 0.05 4,764.81 35,640.81 9,00 26.25 151
MARCH 3,90 0.07 6,757.37 50,545.15 12,00 26.25 160
APRIL 4.40 0.08 7,623,70 57,025.29 13.00 26.25 167
MAY 5.90 0,11 10,222.69 76,465.73 18.00 26.25 162
JUNE 7.40 0.13 12,821.68 95,906.17 22,00 26,25 166
JULY 7,60 0.14 13,168,21 98,498.23 22,00 26,25 171
AUGUST 7.00 0,13 12,128,62 90,722,06 20.00 26,25 173
SEPTEMBER 5.80 0,10 10,049.43 75,169,70 17.00 26,25 168
OCTOBER 3.90 0,07 6,757.37 50,545,15 12,00 26,25 160
NOVEMBER 2.60 0.05 4,504.91 33,696.76 8.00 26.25 160
DECEMBER 2.10 0.04 3638.59 27,216,62 7.00 26.25 148
------------------------
55.45 1.00 96,075,97
CU.FT.
CU,FT./GAL,
96,075,97
7.48
OB/16/02
ex'-f&it A'3
*East Margarita Parkway (Controller J) CSD02-0015
01-153
BUDGET ESTIMATE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
PLANTING
TREES 24" BOX 153.00 EA. 225.00 34,425.00
SHRUBS 5 GAL 3,335.00 EA. 16.00 53,360.00
1 GAL 4,526.00 EA. 5.00 22,630.00
SOIL CLEARlWEED 12,743.00 S.F. 0.03 382.29
GRADE/AMEND S.F. 0.10 0.00
BARK 12,743.00 S.F. 0.15 1,911.45
CONCRETE MOW STRIP 2,036.00 L.F. 2.95 6,006.20
PLANTING SUB-TOTAL 118,714.94
IRRIGATION
KBI CHECK VALVE 44.00 EA. 7.50 330.00
CONTROLER ASSEMBLY 2.00 EA. 5,000.00 10,000.00
BASKET STRNR 1 INCH 2.00 EA. 200.00 400.00
R.C-V. 1 INCH 19.00 EA. 35.00 665.00
RAlNBIRD PRS REG 3/4 19.00 EA. 12.00 228.00
API WYE STRNR 19.00 EA. 20.00 380.00
QUICK COUPLER 44,00 EA. 30.00 1,320.00
API END FLUSH CAP 42.00 EA. 3.50 147.00
B.VALVE 2 INCH 15.00 EA. 30.00 450.00
BOWSMITH EMITTER 8,174.00 EA. 0.90 7,356.60
RAlNBIRD RAIN GUAGE 3.00 EA. 42.00 126.00
MASTER VALVE 2 INCH 2.00 EA. 150.00 300.00
FLOW METER 1 INCH 2.00 EA. 400.00 800.00
RAlNBIRD BUBBLERS 306.00 EA. 1.00 306.00
MAIN 2 INCH 6,389.00 L.F. 2.25 14,375.25
1 INCH 518.00 L.F. 1.25 647.50
LATERAL 1-112 INCH 127.00 L.F, 1.60 203.20
1-114 INCH 125.00 L.F. 1.40 175.00
1 INCH 3,800.00 L.F 1.20 4,560.00
3/4 INCH 5,565.00 L.F. 1.05 5,843.25
IRRIGATION SUBTOTAL 48,282,80
PLANTING AND IRRIGATION TOTAL 166,997,74
NUUNTENANC ~ONTH 12,743.00 S.F. 0.015 191.15
PER YEAR 2,293.74
* This estimate is for Controller "J" only.
01-153 C.R Medians I-Parkway
08116/02
*East Margarita Parkway (Controller J) CSD02-0015
01-153
WATER BUDGET
PROCESS STEP (1) (2) (3)
NUMBER DRIP SHRUB SPRAY LAWN SPRAY
HYDRaZONE 12743
NUMBER
12743
ETa RATE (1) 55.45 55.45 55.45
(IN.NR)
(TABLE NO, 1)
AREA OF HYDRaZONE (2) 12,743.00 0.00 0.00
(SQ,FT.)
PLANT COEFFICIENT (3) 0,30 0,30 0,70
(TABLE NO, 4)
IRRlGATION (4) 0,90 0,70 0.70
DISTRIBUTION
EFFICIENCY
(TABLE NO,2)
IRRlGATION (5) 0.85 0,85 0.85
OPERATION
EFFICIENCY
(TABLE NO, 3)
YEARLY (6) 16.64 16,64 38.82
WATER DEMAND
(STEP #1 xSTEP #3)
(IN,NR)
TOTAL WATER (7) 17,594,32 0,00 0,00
DEMAND (0.083
xSTEP #2
xSTEP #6) (Co. FT,)
IRRIGATION EFFICIENC (8) 0.72 0.77 0,60
(STEP #4 x STEP #5)
HYDRaZONE WATER (9) 24,436.56 0,00 0,00
DEMAND(STEP #7 / STEP
#8 (Co. FT.)
--------------------------------------------
46,918,20
Allowable Project Demand (Step #10)
(0.083 x 0,8 x Step #1 x total of all
Step #2's),
24,436.56
Total of all water demands,
08/16/02
.
<
*East Margarita Parkway (Controller J) CSD02-0015
01-153
DRIP
ETO %ETO co. FT. GALLONS DAYS GPM MINIDAY
JANUARY 2,10 0.04 925.46 6,922.44 7,00 136,23 7
FEBRUARY 2.75 0.05 12,743.00 95,317.64 9.00 136.23 78
MARCH 3.90 0,07 12,743.00 95,317.64 12,00 136.23 58
APRIL 4.40 0,08 1,939,06 14,504.17 13.00 136.23 8
MAY 5,90 0.11 2,600.10 19,448.77 18,00 136,23 8
JUNE 7.40 0.13 3,261.15 24,393,37 22.00 136.23 8
JULY 7,60 0.14 3,349,29 25,052.65 22.00 136.23 8
AUGUST 7.00 0,13 3,084,87 23,074.81 20.00 136.23 8
SEPTEMBER 5.80 0.10 2,556,03 19,119.13 17,00 136.23 8
OCTOBER 3,90 0,07 1,718.71 12,855.97 12.00 136.23 8
NOVEMBER 2,60 0.05 1,145,81 8,570,64 8,00 136,23 8
DECEMBER 2,10 0.04 925.46 6,922.44 7,00 136,23 7
------------------------
55.45 1.00 46,991.94
Co.FT.
Co.FT.lGAL.
24,436.56
7.48
08/16/02
--
Exlli" il- A4
Loop Road
01-153
BUDGET ESTIMATE
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
PLANTING
TREES 36" BOX EA. 600.00 0.00
24" BOX EA. 225.00 0.00
15 GAL 1,038.00 EA. 75.00 77,850.00
SHRUBS 5 GAL 2,443.00 EA. 16.00 39,088.00
I GAL 1,827.00 EA. 5.00 9,135.00
JUTE NETTING S.F. 0.12 0.00
LAWN HYDRO SEED 10,138.00 S.F. 0.10 1,013.80
SOIL CLEARlWEED 20,508.00 S.F. 0.Q3 615.24
GRADEl AMEND 10,138,00 S.F. 0.10 1,013.80
BARK 10,370.00 S.F. 0.15 1,555.50
CONCRETE MOW STRIP 307.00 L.F. 2.95 905.65
PLANTING SUB-TOTAL 131,176,99
IRRIGATION
KBI CHECK VALVE 37.00 EA. 7.50 277.50
CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY 2.00 EA. 5,000.00 10,000.00
BASKET STRNR I INCH 1.00 EA. 200.00 200.00
R.Cv. I INCH 19.00 EA. 35.00 665.00
I 112 INCH 38.00 EA. 40.00 1,520.00
RAINBIRD PRS REG 3/4 19.00 EA. 12.00 228.00
API WYE STRNR 19.00 EA. 20.00 380.00
QUICK COUPLER 75.00 EA. 30.00 2,250.00
API END FLUSH CAP 89.00 EA. 3.50 311.50
RVALVE 2 INCH 16.00 EA. 30.00 480.00
BOWSMITH EMITTER 11,165.00 EA. 0.90 10,048.50
RAINBIRD RAIN GUAGE 1.00 EA. 42.00 42.00
MASTER VALVE 2 INCH 1.00 EA. 150.00 150.00
FLOW METER 2 INCH 1.00 EA. 525.00 525.00
RAINBIRD 6 POP-UP 1,829.00 EA. 6.00 10,974.00
MAIN 2 INCH 7,063.00 L.F. 2.25 15,891.75
LATERAL 2 INCH 250.00 L.F. 2.25 562.50
1-l/2INCH 2,456.00 L.F. 1.60 3,929.60
1-l/4INCH 2,456.00 L.F. 1.40 3,438.40
I INCH 4,900.00 L.F 1.20 5,880.00
3/4 INCH 14,737.00 L.F, 1.05 15,473.85
IRRIGATION SUBTOTAL 82,950.10
PLANTING AND IRRIGATION TOTAL 214,127,09
MAINTENANCE /MONTH
20,508.00 S.F.
0.Ql5 307.62
PER YEAR 3,691.44
01-153 C.R L<>op Road
08116/02
y Loop Road
01-153
WATER BUDGET
PROCESS STEP (1) (2) (3)
NUMBER DRIP SHRUB SPRAY LAWN SPRAY
HYDROZONE
NUMBER
ETORATE (1) 55.45 55.45 55.45
(IN,NR.)
(TABLE NO, 1)
AREA OF HYDROZONE (2) 10,370,00 0.00 10,138,00
(SQ.FT,)
PLANT COEFFICIENT (3) 0,30 0.30 0.70
(TABLE NO, 4)
IRRIGATION (4) 0.90 0.70 0,70
DISTRIBUTION
EFFICIENCY
(TABLE NO.2)
IRRIGATION (5) 0,85 0,85 0,85
OPERATION
EFFICIENCY
(TABLE NO.3)
YEARLY (6) 16,64 16.64 38.82
WATER DEMAND
(STEP #1 xSTEP #3)
(IN.NR.)
TOTAL WATER (7) 14,317,91 0,00 32,661.04
DEMAND (0.083
xSTEP #2
xSTEP #6) (CU. FT.)
IRRIGATION EFFICIENC (8) 0,72 0,77 0.60
(STEP #4 x STEP #5)
HYDROZONE WATER (9) 19,885.99 0,00 54,892.50
DEMAND(STEP #7 / STEP
#8 (CU.FT.)
--------------------------------------------
75,508.00 Allowable Project Demand (Step #10)
(0,083 x 0,8 x Step #1 x total of all
Step #2's),
74,778.49 Total of all water demands,
OB/16/02
Loop Road
01-153
DRIP
ETO %ETO CU.FT, GALLONS DAYS GPM MIN/DA Y
JANUARY 2.10 0,04 753,12 5,633.35 10,00 186.08 3
FEBRUARY 2.75 0.05 986.23 7,377.00 13.00 186.08 3
MARCH 3.90 0.07 1,398.65 10,461.93 18,00 186,08 3
APRIL 4.40 0.08 1,577.97 11,803.20 21.00 186,08 3
MAY 5,90 0,11 2,115.91 15,827.02 31.00 186.08 3
JUNE 7.40 0.13 2,653.86 19,850.84 30.00 186.08 4
JULY 7.60 0,14 2,725.58 20,387,35 31.00 186,08 4
AUGUST 7,00 0,13 2,510.40 18,777.82 30,00 186.08 3
SEPTEMBER 5,80 0.10 2,080.05 15,558,77 26,00 186.08 3
OCTOBER 3.90 0.07 1,398.65 10,461.93 20.00 186,08 3
NOVEMBER 2.60 0.05 932.44 6,974.62 12.00 186,08 3
DECEMBER 2,10 0,04 753,12 5,633,35 10.00 186.08 3
------------------------
55.45 1.00 19,885.99
CU.FT,
CU.FT./GAL,
19,885.99
7.48
OB/16/02
Loop Road
01-153
LAWN
ETo KC ETc PR MlM DIM MID
JANUARY 2.10 0.70 1.47 1.50 59 6 10
FEBRUARY 2.7~ 0.70 1.93 1.50 77 8 10
MARCH 3.90 0.70 2.73 1.50 109 12 9
APRIL 4.40 0.70 3.08 1.50 123 13 9
MAY 5.90 0.70 4.13 1.50 165 17 10
JUNE 7.40 0.70 5.18 1.50 207 22 9
JULY 7.60 0.70 5.32 1.50 213 22 10
AUGUST 7.00 0.70 4.90 1.50 196 22 9
SEPTEMBER 5.80 0.70 4.06 1.50 162 18 9
OCTOBER 3.90 0.70 2.73 1.50 109 12 9
NOVEMBER 2.60 0.70 1.82 1.50 73 8 9
DECEMBER 2,10 0.70 1.47 1.50 59 6 10
TOTAL 55.45
NOTE: Daily run time will have to be increased
during the plant establishment period.
ETo Reference Evapotranspiration
KC Crop Coefficient
ETc Crop Evapotranspiration
PR Precipitation Rate
MlM Minutes per Month
DIM Days per Month
MID Minutes per Day
08/16/02
, ,
,
CITY OF TEMECULA
PARKLANDILANDSCAPE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Bond No. SV 9729
Premium: $1,178.00
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and Harveston LLC
(hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement
whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain Parkland Improvements, which said
Agreement, dated ~'e.f*~ '1-20D2 , and identified as Project Tract 29639-1,
Harveston Drive (Loop Road) , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
ParkR'!Y~
W HbREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the Agreement to furnish a bond for
the Faithful Performance of the Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and St. Paul Fire* as surety, are held
and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of
$ 471,000.00
lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we
bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally,
The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and void if
the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns,
shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants, conditions,
and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or
their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all
respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnifY and save harmless
the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated; otherwise, this
obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement rendered,
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
*and Marine Insurance Company
'.
does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or the work or to the specifications,
//1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on
September 11
,20~,
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY
SURETY
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar HBmes of California, Inc.
its administrative member
PRINCIPAL
BY: a.~..!71n~
BY:-\
~
'-
Patricia H. Brebner
(NAME)
Attorney-in-Fact
(TITLE)
ThomAS RAnks
(NAME)
Vice President
(TITLE)
BY: C(.QLL)~.~
Dee Baker
(NAME)
Asst. Secretary
(TITLE)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorsen
City Attorney
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Oranae
On September 11, 2002 before me, S. McDonald. Notary Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
~/I~/J'#
i-------...,'~,.~. .
@ s. Me DONALD
- ~. Commission # 1260983 ~
~ -.. .}, Notary PUblic. California ~
j' Orange County f
_ _ _ _My_~m.ExpjresAp'16,2CX)4
- - - - - -
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Corporate Officers
Dee Baker - Asst. Secretary
Thomas Banks - Vice President
Lennar Homes of California, Inc,
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Performance Bond No, SV9729
Number of Pages: Two (2)
Date of Document: September 11, 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No. 5907
State of California
Cou nty of Orange
On
September II 2002
DATE
personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner
before me, Alexis H, Bryan, Notary Public
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - EG., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC"
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
~ personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/shelthey executed the same in
his/herltheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/herllheir
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
ALEXIS H. BRYAN
~ Commission#13~13~ ~
~ .. Notary Public - California ~
Z Orange County
My Comm. Expires Jun 1,2005
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~p t\,~J-0
SIGNATU E OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
o INDIVIDUAL
o CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
o PARTNER(S)
~
o
o
o
TlTlE(S)
o LIMITED
o GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTI1Y(IES)
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-40B7/GEEF 2/98
C 1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION" B238 RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184" Canoga Part<, CA 91309.7184
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bond No. SV 9729
Premium included in charge
for performance bond
PARKLANDILANDSCAPE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and
Harveston LLC
. (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an
Agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain Parkland Improvements,
which said Agreement, dated ~ t ~ <1-, 20 Eb and identified as
Tract 29639-1, Harveston
Project Drive (L6op Road) Parkways, is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, under the term of said Agreement, Principal is required before entering upon
the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of
Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section
3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and
NOW, TIlEREFORE, we the principal and St. Paul Fire and*
as Surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors,
subcontractors, laborers, materialmen, other persons employed in the performance of the
aforesaid Agreement and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of
$ 235,500. QQawful money of the United States, for materials furnished or labor thereon of any
kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or
labor, that Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount set forth,
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of
any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15
*Marine Insurance Company
C:\DOCUME-I\Pbrebner\LOCAL8-l\Temp\parkland landscape labor and materials bond.doc
-1-
(commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of
action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
If the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and
void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
C:\DOClJME..IIPbrebner\LOCALS-l\Templparkland landscape labor and materials bond.doc
-2-
IN WTINESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on
September 11
,20~,
(Seal)
(Seal)
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY
SURETY
By: l!k~:.;'JI./f~
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar Homes of California, Inc.
its administrative member
PRINCIPAL
BJ==
~ ----
-
Patricia H. Brebner
(Name)
Thomas Banks
(Name)
Vice President
Attorney-in-Fact
(Title)
(Title)
By:
t(P/J .~
Dee Baker
(Name)
Asst. Secretary
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
C:\DOCUME-I IPbrebner\LOCALS-IITemplparkland landscape labor and materials bonddoc
-3 -
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Oranae
On September 11, 2002 before me, S, McDonald. Notary Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
. ~Aa/c7
~------------J
..,..,.,..,. S, MC DONAlD
! ~? Commission # 1260983
~ ,,;~.. ':1;'.:t' Notary Public - California ~
~z \"~,';'C:);V Orange.caunty r
~="" MyComm. Expires Apr16,2004 ,
~~~
OPTIONAL
Thaugh the data belaw is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER-
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Corporate Officers
Dee Baker - Ass!. Secretary
Thomas Banks Vice President
Lennar Homes of California, Inc,
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Payment Bond No. SV9729
Number of Pages: Three (3)
Date of Document: September 11. 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No. 5907
State of California
County of Orange
On
September 11 2002
DATE
personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner
before me, Alexis H. Bryan, Notary Public
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC"
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
~ personally known to me - OR - D proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
ALEXIS H. BRYAN
. Commission" 130673& z
~ _.; Notary Public. Califomia ~
Z Orange County
, My Comm. Expires Jun 1. 2005
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
. ~-\\.~ 0
SIGNATU OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
D INDIVIDUAL
D CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
D PARTNER(S)
~
D
D
D
TlTlE(S)
D LIMITED
D GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-4067/GEEF 2/98
@1993NATIONALNOTARYASSOCIATION'8236RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184 . Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
Bond No. SV 9729
Premium included in charge
for performance bond
CITY OF TEMECULA
P ARKLAND/LANDSCAPE WARRANTY BOND
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California (hereinafter designated as "City"),
and Harveston LLC
(hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into
an Agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated Parkland
Improvements, which said Agreement, dated .st€fr~v '1 20 D2.. , and
m~act 29639-1, Harveston
identified as Project Drive (Loop Road) Parkways, is hereby referred to and made a
part hereof; and
WHEREAS, Principal is required to warranty the work done under the terms of the
Agreement for a period of one (1) year following acceptance thereof by City against any
defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished, in the amount of ten percent (10%)
of the estimated cost of the improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and St. Paul Fire and*
as surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of
$ 47,100.00
, lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly
and severally, The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and
void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or
assigns shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants,
conditions, and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided,
on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and
in all respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnifY and save
harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, aB therein stipulated;
otherwise, this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect.
*Marine Insurance Company
C:\DOCUME-l IPbrebnerILOCALS-1 ITemplparkland landscape Warranty Bond l,doc
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement rendered,
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications,
C:\DOCUME-I IPbrebnerILOCALS-1 ITemplparkland landscape Warranty Bond I.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on
September 11
,20~,
(Seal)
(Seal)
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY
SURETY
By: /a;;~:_))?(I?~
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar Homes of California, Inc.
its administrative member
PRIN~
By: 1 ~ "\.
~
,
Patricia H. Brebner
(Name)
Thomas Banks
(Name)
Attorney-in-Fact
(Title)
Vice President
(Title)
By:--tii/ ~--'-'
Dee Baker
(Name)
Asst. Secretary
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
C:\DOCUME-l \Pbrebner\LOCALS-l ITemplparkland landscape Warranty Bond l.doc
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Oranoe
On September 11, 2002 before me, S, McDonald. Notary Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
~~('Pjld
l-----..-....---~
____ s, Me DONALD
i~J """OM""""" .
J~'';J~t~'': NOj&~~~~C c~~~omla r
~ MyComm.8cpiresAprl6.2004
------------
Witness my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Coroorate Officers
Dee Baker - Asst. Secretary
Thomas Banks - Vice President
Lennar Homes of California, Inc,
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Maintenance Bond No, SV9729
Number of Pages: Three (3)
Date of Document: September 11. 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H, Brebner
C.(LIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No. 5907
State of California
County of Orange
On
September II 2002
DATE
personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner
before me, Alexis H, Bryan, Notary Public
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER" E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC"
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
i:8J personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
~------------~
ALExiS H, BRYAN
-~ Commission' 1306738 z
~ ..: Notary Public" California ~
j .' Orange County t
_ _ _ _My:o:m~Ex~i~J:1.:...2~5
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~ \\.~~
SIGNATURE F NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
o INDIVIDUAL
o CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
o PARTNER(S)
i:8J
o
o
o
TITLE(S)
B LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-iN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-4067/GEEF 2/98
10 1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION. 8236 RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184. Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
TheStRlul
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
U oited States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Power of Attorney No.
22775
Certificate No.
1401224
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that
81. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 81. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and
that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters,
Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies'), and that the Companies do hereby make,
constitute and appoint
James A, Schaller, Rhonda C. Abel, Jane Kepner, Nanette Marlella-Myers, Mike Parizino, Unda Enright,
Jeri Apodaca, Patricia H. Brebner, Leigh McDonough and Alexis H, Bryan
of the City of Costa Mesa ,State California ,their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact,
each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings,
contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the
perfonnance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or pennitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this
4th
day of
October
.2001
Seaboard Surety Company
S1. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
S1. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
e
@ PETER W. CARMAN, Vi" Pre,id,nl
~e,r1~
State of Maryland
City of Baltimore
THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistant Secretary
On this 4th day of October , 2001 , before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Peter W Carman and
Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and
Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and
Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of
said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the
corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers.
In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
~t~./)~.!~
My Commission expires the 1st day of July, 2006.
REBECCA EASLEY-ONOKALA, Notary Public
86203 Rev. 7-2002 Printed in U.S.A.
,
CITY OF TEMECULA
PARKLANDILANDSCAPE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Bond No. SV 9730
Premium: $915.00
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and Harveston LLC
(hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement
whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain Parkland Improvements, which said
Agreement, dated ~~1-200Z., and identified as ProjectTract 29639-1, Date Street!
Margarita Road Parkways , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the Agreement to furnish a bond for
the Faithful Performance of the Agreement;
NOW, TIIEREFORE, we the Principal and St. Paul Fire* as surety, are held
and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of
$ 365,800,00
lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we
bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally.
The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and void if
the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns,
shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants, conditions,
and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or
their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all
respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless
the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated; otherwise, this
obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement rendered,
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
*and Marine Insurance Company
does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or the work or to the specifications,
III
IN WIlNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on September 11 , 20~,
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY
SURETY
BY: 12t:.~:. ),l1f3~
Patricia H. Brebner
(NAME)
Attorney-in-Fact
(TITLE)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorsen
City Attorney
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar HBmes of California, Inc.
its administrative member
PRINCIPAL
r \ .~
BY: ~
Thomas Banks
(NAME)
Vice President
(TITLE)
BY: l(k ~JA
Dee Baker
(NAME)
Asst. Secretary
(TITLE)
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Oranae
On September 11, 2002 before me, S. McDonald. Notary Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
l-------..----I
S. Me DONALD
'< tt:fl; Commission # 126.0983 z
Z f.+--ffi -e,::. <j;: Nomry PUDlIc - California ~
[2 \~';.,l~:,; Orange Couniy f
~'" MyComm.E>piresAp'16.2lXl4
-,~ ~ .' 0r'IiI' ~ .JJ. _ _
.~ffM
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Corporate Officers
Dee Baker - Asst. Secretary
Thomas Banks - Vice President
Lennar Homes of California. Inc.
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Performance Bond No. SV9730
Number of Pages: Two (2)
Date of Document: September 11. 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No. 5907
State of California
County of Orange
On
September II 2002
DATE
personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner
before me, Alexis H. Bryan, Notary Public
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.. "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC"
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
[gJ personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
~------------~
@ ALEXIS H. BRYAN
' Commission # 1306738
- z
~ --".' - Notary Public" California ~
~. Orange County t
_ ~ _ ~y:o:m~~in:J~1~2~5
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
c~ 4. V~~
SIGNATURE OF OTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
o INDIVIDUAL
o CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TlTLE(S)
8 LIMITED
GENERAL
o PARTNER(S)
[gJ
o
o
o
ATTORNEY-iN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTl1Y(IES)
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-4067/GEEF 2/98
C> 1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATlON. 8236 RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184. Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bond No. SV 9730
Premium included in charge
for performance bond
PARKLAND/LANDSCAPE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and
Harveston LLC
, (hereinafter designated as ''Principal'') have entered into an
Agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain Parkland Improvements,
which said Agreement, dated -~,.J-&lLhu '1-, 2001., and identified as
Tract 29639-1 Date Stree~
Project Margarita Road Parkways, is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, under the term of said Agreement, Principal is required before entering upon
the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond, with the City of
Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section
3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and St. Paul Fire and*
as Surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors,
subcontractors, laborers, materialmen, other persons employed in the performance of the
aforesaid Agreement and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of
$ 182,900. o.aawful money of the United States, for materials furnished or labor thereon of any
kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment insurance Act with respect to such work or
labor, that Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount set forth.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of
any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15
*Marine Insurance Company
C:IDOClJME...I IPbrebnerlLOCALS-IITemp\parldand landscape labor and materials bond.doc
-I.
(commencing with Section 3082) ofPart 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of
action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
If the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and
void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
C:\DOC1lM&- tIPbrebnerlLOCALS-IITemplparldand landscape labor and materials bond.doc
-2-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on
September 11
, 2002 .
(Seal)
(Seal)
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE.
INSURANCE COMPANY
SURE~
By: ,.,:_)118~
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar Homes of California, Inc.
its administrative member
PRTNC'TPAT<!-
?, ""'~
By:-.J- - ____
Patricia H. Brebner
(Name)
Thomas Banks
(Name)
Attorney-in-Fact
(Title)
Vice President
(Title)
By:
{L~;,.L
Dee Baker
(Name)
Asst. Secretary
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
C:\DOCUME-I IPbrebneJ\LOCALS-l\Templparldand landscape labor and materials bonddoc
-3 -
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Oranae
On September 11. 2002 before me, S. McDonald. Notarv Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
L ~M/7/d
---_-...-----_.-._-~
..~_ s. Me DONALD
1 (Ji;~t"';. Commi;sion # 1260'183 z
3!!:-~'-'",;, '"~'4 Notary Public - California ~
Z f.,- t >A"; '. -7 Oronce County I J
>..'" ~ / ....
~ <"'::'~" My Comm. "xph" Ap'16. 2lXl4
~\~-.&,.~...",~
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Corporate Officers
Dee Baker - Asst. Secretary
Thomas Banks Vice President
Lennar Homes of California. inc.
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Payment Bond No. SV9730
Number of Pages: Three (3)
Date of Document: September 11. 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No. 5907
State of California
County of Orange
On
before me, Alexis H. Bryan, Notary Public
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.. "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC"
September II 2002
DATE
personaily appeared Patricia H. Brebner
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
[gJ personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
~-----------~~
~ ALEXIS H. BRYAN
_ Commission' 1306738 z
~,. Notary Public. California ~
~ Or. nge County t
_ ~ _ ~Y:O~~~ire~J,:,1.:..2~5
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
A0il~
C ' SIGNATU OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
o INDIVIDUAL
o CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TITLE(S)
8 LIMITED
GENERAL
o PARTNER(S)
[gJ
o
o
o
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-4067/GEEF 2/98
@1993NATlONAlNOTARYASSOCIATlON.8236RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184. Canoga Pal1<, CA 91309-7164
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bond No. SV 9730
Premium incidded in charge
for performance bond
PARKLANDILANDSCAPE WARRANTY BOND
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California (hereinafter designated as "City"),
and Harveston LLC
(hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into
an Agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated Parkland
Improvements, which said Agreement, dated~1-~"'" 1 20 6:2 . and
Tract 29639-1 Date St~
identified as Project Margarita Road Parkways , is hereby referred to and made a
part hereof; and
WHEREAS, Principal is required to warranty the work done under the terms of the
Agreement for a period of one (1) year following acceptance thereof by City against any
defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished, in the amount of ten percent (10%)
of the estimated cost of the improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and St. Paul Fire and*
as surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of
$ 36,580.00
, lawful money of the Unip:d States, for the payment of such sum well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly
and severally. The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and
void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or
assigns shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants,
conditions, and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided,
on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and
in all respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save
harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated;
otherwise, this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect.
*Marine Insurance Company
C:\DOCUME-IIPbrebnerILOCALS-IITemplparkland landscape Warranty Bond l.doc
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement render.ed.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
C:\DOCUME-I \PbrebnerILOCALS-I \Templpark1and landscape Warranty Bond I.doc
,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this ins1ntment has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on
September 11
,20~.
(Seal)
(Seal)
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY
SURE~
By: ~~~:-)~fi~
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar Homes of California, Inc.
its.administrative member
JmR" (;11> ftL -
~ l
-
l
-
By:
Patricia H. Brebner
(Name)
Thomas Banks
(Name)
Vice President
.Attorney-in-Fact
(Title)
(Title)
By:
~~
Dee Baker
(Name)
Asst. Secretary
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
C:\DOCUME-I\Pbrebner\LOCAL8-1\Templparkland landscape Warranty Bond I.doc
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Oranae
On September 11. 2002 before me, S. McDonald. Notarv Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
~diJdhl
r1t,....~...../~...pl/;;~.,..._.:lh.~..,~.C1
::;, fvL.':: QCh:\LD
1 Cc'nr'~i,~'~'''-':!:'c ")6"98'~
~. "', ..:f: ..}- ., '-"~"" ,~ \.- . .. z
Z '5.," , 'j NO!ury Puu';c- California ~
z~ ":,,,.;:'.} Ororge County d-
'.~"fi"-'-/>-/ . ~
.. t{,~"r-- {V,;,.. :.0iT1('!"\. ;:xci'-esApr16.2CXJ4
.t-".....3~...,,'-'~:......i,.''W--.,''''~'~;''~'V~~
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Corporate Officers
Dee Baker - Asst. Secretary
Thomas Banks - Vice President
Lennar Homes of California. Inc.
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Maintenance Bond No. SV9730
Number of Pages: Three (3)
Date of Document: September 11. 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner
CAliFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No. 5907
State of California
County of Orange
September II 2002
DAnE
personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner
before me, Alexis H. Bryan, Notary Public
NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER" E.G.. "JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC"
On
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
[gJ personally known to me - OR - 0
i------------
@ ALEXIS H. BRYAN
- Commission' 1306138 ~
~ -e: . Notary Public. Cafifomia ~
j , Orange County f
, MyComm. EJcpiresJun 1, 2005'
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
A-lzf2 \-\- ~
C 'SIGNATURE NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
o INDIVIDUAL
o CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TlTLE(S)
8 LIMITED
GENERAL
o
[gJ
o
o
o
PARTNER(S)
ATTORNEY-iN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTlTY(IES)
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-4067/GEEF 2/9B
C 1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION' 8236 RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184' Canoga Park, CA 91309M7184
TheStRlul
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Power of Attorney No.
22775
Cortin.ato No. 14 0 12 2 5
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that
51. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 51. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and 51. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and
that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters,
Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies ''), and that the Companies do hereby make,
constitute and appoint
James A. Schaller, Rhonda C. Abel, Jane Kepner, Nanette Mariella-Myers, Mike Parizino, Linda Enright,
Jeri Apodaca, Patricia H. Brebner, Leigh McDonough and Alexis H. Bryan
of the City of Costa Mesa , State California , their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact,
each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings,
contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the
performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed b~ law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this
4th
day of
October
2001
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
e
@ PETER W. CARMAN, V;ce Pm;d,,!
~e.rI~
State of Maryland
City of Baltimore
THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistant Secretary
On this 4th day of October 2001, before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Peter W. Cannan and
Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and
Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, 51. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and
Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of
said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the
corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers.
In Witness Whereof, J hereunto set my hand and official seal.
~J;AA1Jg'~
My Commission expires the 1st day of July, 2006.
REBECCA EASLEY-ONOKALA, Notary Public
86203 Rev. 7-2002 Printed in U.S.A.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PARKLANDILANDSCAPE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Bond No. SV 9731
Premium: $771.00
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and Harveston LLC
(hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement
whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain Parkland Improvements, which said
Agreement, dated Serte~ '1 2002. , and identified as Project Tract 29639-1 Date Street/
Margarita Road Medians . is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the Agreement to furnish a bond for
the Faithful Performance of the Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and St. Paul Fire* as surety, are held
and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of
$ 308,500.00
lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we
. bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally.
The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and void if
the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns,
shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants, conditions,
and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or
their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all
respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless
the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated; otherwise, this
obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
*and Marine Insurance Company
does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or the work or to the specifications.
III
IN WIlNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on September 11 , 20...QL...
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY
SURETY
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar Hames of California, Inc.
its administrative member
PRINCIPAL
BY:
/J.:: ))(jj~
-
::j
~
Patricia H. Brebner
(NAME)
Attorney-in-Fact
(TITLE)
Thomas Banks
(NAME)
Vice President
(TIlLE)
BY: '(.o1.J ~
Dee Baker
Asst. ~~~ry
(TIlLE)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorsen
City Attorney
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Oranae
On September 11, 2002 before me, S. McDonald, Notarv Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
. ~A/J/~
r ~.. .~.' ",--."...- - - -I
.-n.- $. Me DGt'~ALD
. "C ';r..
ft':-.! :t':;\ Commission it 1260983 z
~ ~".r:.;" ___....:;d Notary PuoHe - Caj~fomia ~
-, 1.:'" ;'" .} Orange CounTY d
~~!;.'~ t-.~y Cor11m. Expires ~.16, 2004
--'(J~~~'~~ W Qi V
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Corporate Officers
Dee Baker - Asst. Secretary
Thomas Banks - Vice President
Lennar Homes of California. Inc.
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Performance Bond No. SV9731
Number of Pages: Two (2)
Date of Document: September 11, 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner
CAL1FORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No. 5907
State of California
County of Orange
On
September II 2002
DAnE
personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner
before me, Alexis H. Bryan, Notary Public
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., "JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC"
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
[gJ personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
aCknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
@ ALEXIS H. BRYAN
_ t Commission' 1306738 z
~ _. Notary Public - Califomia ~
z -
Orange County
.. My ComO" Expires Jun 1, 2005
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~tt.D vJ
~E OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
o INDIVIDUAL
o CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
o PARTNER(S)
[gJ
o
o
o
TITLE(S)
8 LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-4067/GEEF 2/98
01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION. 8236 RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184. Canoga Park, CA 91309.7184
. CITY OF TEMECULA
P ARKLANDILANDSCAPE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND
Bond No. SV 9731
Premium included in charge
for performance bond
WHEREAS, the City ofTemecula, State of California, and
Harveston LLC
, (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an
Agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain Parkland Improvements,
which said Agreement,. dated ~enk{ ~ 20~ and identified as
Tract 29639-1 Date Streett
Project Margarita Road Medians , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, under the term of said Agreement, Principal is required before entering upon
the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond. with the City of
Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section
3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and St. Paul Fire and'"
as Surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors,
subcontractors, laborers, materialmen, other persons employed in the performance of the
aforesaid Agreement and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in, the penal sum of
$ 154.250. OGBwful money of the United States, for materials furnished or labor thereon ofany
kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or
labor, that Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount set forth.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of
any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15
"'Marine Insurance Company
C:\DOCUME-IIPbrebneJll.OCALS-JlTemplparldand landscape labor and materials bond.doc
-1-
(commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of
action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
If the condition of this bond is fully perfonned, then this obligation shall become null and
void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or .
addition to the tenns of the Agreement or to the work to be perfonned thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extension of time, altemtion or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
C:IDOClJM&..l IPbrebnerlLOCALS-IITemplparldand landscape labor and materials bond. doc
-2-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on
September 11
,20~.
(Seal)
(Seal)
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE .
INSURANCE COMPANY
SUREI2
By: h:..:.)71iJ~
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar Homes of California, Inc.
its administrative member
PRINCIPAL
By:_I- - ~ '-----
Patricia H. Brebner
(Name)
Thomas Banks
(Name)
Attorney-in-Fact
(Title)
Vice President
(Title)
By:
~&.~
Dee Baker
(Name)
Agst. Secretary
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
C:lDOCIJME...t IPbrebnerlLOCALS-tlTemp\parkland landscape labor and materials bond.doc
-3.
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Oranae
On September 11, 2002 before me, S. McDonald, Notarv Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
J------------~
~ s. Me DONALD
-l;~~~~ Commission # 1260983 z
~ ;orb. :;Jl~~:t, Notary Pt;bl1c. Caiifomia ~
2~ ~.at:'ill Orange Couniy f
"""""'" My Comm. Expires Ap' 16, 2lXl4 r
""~.
,A~~u
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Corporate Officers
Dee Baker Asst. Secretarv
Thomas Banks - Vice President
Lennar Homes of California. Inc.
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Payment Bond No. SV9731
Number of Pages: Three (3)
Date of Document: September 11, 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner
.. CAL:iFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No. 5907
State of California
County of Orange
On
before me, Alexis H. Bryan, Notary Public
NAME, TiTlE OF OFFICER. E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC"
September 11 2002
DATE
personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
[gJ personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
EXtS H. BRyAN
'I A\nissionll'306738 Z
t Com Public'" Ca\ifoml3 !
-, Notal'!
~ .. Orange County 005
Z . c~ire.Jun1.2
.. MyComm.~...
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~~.~~
SIGNATUR OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
o INDIVIDUAL
o CORPORATE OFFiCER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
o PARTNER(S)
[gJ
o
o
o
TlTLE(S)
8 LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-iN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-4067/GEEF 2/98
Cl1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION. 8236 RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184' Canoga Park, CA 91309.7184
'.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bond No. SV 9731
Premium included in charge
for performance bond
PARKLANDILANDSCAPE WARRANTY BOND
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California (hereinafter designated as "City"),
and Harveston LLC
(hereinafter designated as ''Principal'') have entered into
an Agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated Parkland
Improvements, which said Agreement, dated &.rl-~"" q 20 02. . and
Tract 29639-1 Date Street! ~
identified as Project Margarita Road Medians . is hereby referred to and made a
part hereof; and
WHEREAS, Principal is required to warranty the work done under the terms of the
Agreement for a period of one (I) year following acceptance thereof by City against any
defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished, in the amount of ten percent (I 0%)
of the estimated cost of the improvements;
NOW, TIffiREFORE, we the Principal and St. Paul Fire and*
as surety,
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of
$ 30.850.00
, lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly
and severally. The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and
void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or
assigns shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants,
conditions, and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided,
on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and
in all respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnifY and save
harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated;
otherwise, this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect
*Marine Insurance Company
C:\DOCUME-l\Pbrebner\LOCALS-I\Templparkland landscape Warranty Bond I.doc
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgement rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to' the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
C:\DOCUME-l IPbrebner\LOCALS-1 \Templparkland landscape Warranty Bond l.doc
.'
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on
September 11
,20~.
(Seal)
(Seal)
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY
SUREM
By: ~.,,:~)1I fi~
HARVESTON LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Lennar Homes of California, Inc.
its administrative member
PRINCIPAL
By: ---r
-
""""--
Patricia H. Brebner
(Name)
-
\.
Thomas Banks
(Name)
.Attorney-in-Fact
(Title)
Vice President
(Title)
BY:_~~)LV
Dee Baker
(Name)
Asst. Secretary
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
C:\DOCUME-i\PbrebnerILOCAL8-l\Templparkland landscape Warranty Bond i.doc
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of OranQe
On September 11, 2002 before me, S. McDonald, Notarv Public, personally
appeared Thomas Banks and Dee Baker, personally known to me to be
the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,
and that by their signatures on the instrument the person or the entity upon
behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal.
~d4~/d
)-----..................-J
.....,~ s. Me DONALD
~. j,~.'''~.... Commission # 1260'183
-~",,'~1;:<"\l-a . . Z
~ ~~-~; ..;':l.'.~,i.:'J Notary Public - Caiifomia ~
J \~.,t:.(:q~~/ Orar,.,ge CQu.niy d-
, '''--::~..&l'-<;/ tv.yCof'lm.::\(li-c-sAtx16,2a)4
j. ,.:,,"....':,-~,...'....4.~...,_:'...''''f.j-.4t.J;-..~J,~. j;
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Corporate Officers
Dee Baker Asst. Secretarv
Thomas Banks - Vice President
Lennar Homes of California. Inc.
DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Type of Document: Maintenance Bond No. SV9731
Number of Pages: Three (3)
Date of Document: September 11, 2002
Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner
CAliFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Orange
On
No. 5907
September II 2002
DATE
personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner
before me, Alexis H. Bryan, Notary Public
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC"
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
[gJ personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
ALEJOS H. BRYAN
@ Commissionj1306738 z
~ ... Notsrv p. ublic - California ~
z _. - Orange County
.. My Comm &pires Jun 1,2005
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~ \\.~A-0
SIGNATUR OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
o INDIVIDUAL
o CORPORATE OFFICER
o PARTNER(S)
[gJ
o
o
o
TlTLE(S)
8 LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-iN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTlTY(IES)
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
S-4067/GEEF 2196
Cl1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION. 8236 RemmetAve., P.O. Box 7184 . Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
11IeStRlul
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Power of Attorney No.
22775
Certificate No.
1401223
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that
S1. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and
that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State oflowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters,
Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies''), and that the Companies do hereby make,
constitute and appoint
James A. Schaller. Rhonda C. Abel, Jane Kepner, Nanette Mariella-Myers, Mike Parizino, Linda Enright,
Jeri Apodaca, Patricia H. Brebner, Leigh McDonongh and Alexis H. Bryan
of the City of Costa Mesa ,State California ,their true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact,
each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings,
contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the
performance of contracts and execqting or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this
4th
day of
October
,2001
Seaboard Surety Company
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company
51. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
e
@ PETER W. CARMAN, Vi" Pre,id,n!
-;Le.r!~
State of Maryland
City of Baltimore
THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistant Secretary
On this 4th day of October 2001, before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Peter W. Carman and
Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, S1. Paul Fire and
Marine Insurance Company, S1. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, S1. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and
Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of
said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the
corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers.
My Commission expires the 1st day of July, 2006.
~~~.~
In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
REBECCA EASLEY-ONOKALA, Notary Public
86203 Rev. 7.2002 Printed in U.S.A.
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA
FROM:
General Manager/Board of Directors
Herman Parker, Director of Community service~
September 17, 2002
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Award of Construction Contract
Project No. PW02-01 CSD, Children's Museum Building Shell Improvements
PREPARED BY:
killiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brian Guillot, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
1. Award a construction contract to R.E. Fleming Construction, Inc., of Hesperia, California
for the Children's Museum Building Shell Improvements, Project No. PW02-01CSD, in the
amount of $347,881.00; and, authorize the President to execute the contract.
2. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $52,182.15, which is equal to 15% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: On March 26, 2002, the Board of Directors approved the Construction
Plans and Specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids
for the Children's Museum Building Shell Improvements, Project No. PW02-01 CSD.
On December 12, 2000, the Board of Directors awarded a contract to Sparks Exhibits and
Environments to design the conceptual master plan for the Imagination Workshop, Temecula
Children's Museum. A committee consisting of Mayor Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Pro Tem Ron
Roberts, Commissioner Jack Henz, educational staff, and TCSD staff worked with the consultant to
design the facility. Through a series of community workshops and several sub-committee meetings
the master plan was developed and forwarded to the Board of Directors for approval. On March 26,
2002, the Board of Directors approved the master plan and Amendment No. 2 to the Sparks
agreement, which authorized the construction and installation of the interior exhibits. The subject
construction contract provides for major modifications to the existing building interior and exterior,
which are not a part of the Sparks agreement.
The improvements consist of modifications to the architecture of the building, structural
modifications, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing system modifications. The work includes the
replacement of the roof and certain offsite improvements such as removal and replacement of the
drive approach.
Two (2) bids for the project were publicly opened on September 5, 2002. The results of the bids are
as follows:
1. R.E. Fleming Construction, Inc. ................................................................$347,881.00
2. Amelco Construction ................................................................................. $490,418.40
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702\PW02.01.AWARD.DOC
R.E. Fleming Construction, Inc. has extensive experience in constructing general building
improvements. They have successfully completed similar projects for the County of Riverside,
Desert Sands Unified School District, and the Snowline Joint Unified School District.
The construction period for this project is 40 working days. Work is expected to begin in October
2002 and be completed in December 2002.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works.
The engineer's estimate was $354,900.00.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Children's Museum Building Shell Improvements is a Capital Improvement
Project funded through Capital Project Reserves, Proposition 12 (State Urban Centers/Education
Grant) and the Redevelopment Agency. The total project cost is $400,063.15, which includes the
contract amount of $347,881.00 plus a 15% contingency in the amount of $52,182.15. Adequate
funds are available for this project in Account No. 210-190-165-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Project Location
2. Project Description
3. Contract
R\AGENDA REPORTS\2002\091702IPW02-01.AWARD.DOC
~
en
~ ~
en <to.."" ~
~ "
~
@ ~
~
%
~ ~ J
0
t:: 2i 0
~ 0
u ~
c ~
'-l a
<i
b ;::
-
~ ~
-
:-:
~ "S
... z~
l>-o
~
.:-
,,0
o
plJp,S"l:
"""",,,"0
0"",,,
'"
-
-
1=1
~
o
~
j:l..,
~
~
~
~
~
~
u
~
~
b
~
~
00
z
[:2
~
U
q;
.,
1=
....
<J
..
.~
o
..
j:l..,
8
::s
<>
'"
~
'"
""
~
::9
:E
U
-
o
<8
<>
lil
::s
<:r
'"
o
o
'"
.-:
oS
t)
E
'"
"
<> 0
il~
<.> 8
~ 6b
oS ._
~ '"
" <>
_0
q;
"""
;"0
f-c'l:l
.... ""
f;l'S::
.~ ...
o '"
.. '"
j:l..,~
~
'0
<fl
~
<>
'"
~
'"
~
:E
U
oS
...
o
"
.9
-
~
"
o
<.>
"0
8
6b
'V;
<>
"0
<>
'" -oS
<> <>
<'>"0
.~ ~
00 .S
p-
.~ .~
-
8 3
8"5'
o ....
Up..
.;.:
...
'"
:; '0'
" ..
",p..
€'o
.. '"
",,""
'" 0
~~
i-
i:J
<>
-oS
...
o
~
o
;.,
'"
-oS
....
<8
'"
.2
-
'8
~
""
""
o
OJ
"
o
.~
<>
....
<.>
~
"0
8
OJ
"
o
.~
<.>
::s
"0
<>
"0
[
><
<>
::::0
.~ ~
_ ...."
<.>....
.~N
8 M"
p..",
....
...
'"
.~
o
..
e=~
..OJ
" ....
'" 0
!l:lf-c
~I
.!!l~
.. ..
S~
<~
.;.:
'"
o
U
00000
0000
cooV')
v) .n 0" ~..
-.::tOOr---N
"1.'"
-
'"
....
c:>
,
""
c:>
c:>
N
""
c:>
.
Ifl
c:>
c:>
N
Ifl
c:>
.,j.
c:>
c:>
N
....
c:>
,
'"
c:>
c:>
N
'"
c:>
,
N
c:>
c:>
N
00 0 00 00
0, 000
10 00'"
tn....,...;-o.....;-
~ 00 l:- N
,.....4 f'I'lV')
-
'"
00 0
00 0
00 0 0
c-rl 0" vi'
M 0 0\
00 ~
'"
"
o
o.g
::::J!l
~ 5
.s = ..s~~
~ 0 CdE;8
=".g ~a=
P.9./:l .9" 0
:':::.t:::.~ ~ ~"+;::
:E.~ d 6h () - (OJ..!:2
.~ 50 ~ 'V; ] ~ ..9 ..
~<<Q~~Pl~
~
'"
S
<>
;>
Pl
o
o
o
...."
N
'"
E
o 0 Ol~
000
00'"
00 00" 0\
....00\
O\MO\
-
'"
~
tJ
"
o
.~
<J
::s
.",
~
....
<>
1::
o <>
o U
~ 8
~ en of ~
"'~~<.>
:::~~~
tn fI) iX1 bD
o Q)....._<(
u~~.....
..... 1) N =
C1) Q)_ Q)
Z'O''' 8
o '"'" 0 0..
o ~ '.0 .9
0_0- co
oO$cg>
-.::t '~e~
",Up..JX:
-
<>
<2l
...
o
C>
S:!
-
'"
o
U
g
~
;,;
....
'"
o r.;
U"O
~ =
ol$""
0'0
f '"
::s ~
.. ::s
::s 0
""'"
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW02-01CSD
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM BUILDING SHELL IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 17th day of September, 2002, by and between
the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and R.E. Fleming Construction, Inc., hereinafter
referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, rlJutually
agree as follows:
1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Perfonmance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW02-01CSD, CHILDREN'S MUSEUM BUILDING SHELL IMPROVEMENTS,
Insurance Fonms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State
of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where
specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version
of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements
as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern
California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California
(hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW02-01CSD,
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM BUILDING SHELL IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of these
Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775 .
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO.
PW02-01CSD, CHILDREN'S MUSEUM BUILDING SHELL IMPROVEMENTS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
CONTRACT
CA-1
R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PWD2I.PW02.Q1 Child Museum\PS&E\Conlractdol
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between.this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following: .
PROJECT NO. PW02-01CSD, CHILDREN'S MUSEUM BUILDING SHELL
IMPROVEMENTS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by DISTRICT.
3. DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools. equipment, and services shall be
furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and
subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives.
4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and
CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the
sum of: THREE HUNDRED FORTY SEVEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY
ONE DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($347,881.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty (40) working
days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by DISTRICT. Construction shall
not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by DISTRICT.
5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE:
A. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule. as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
CONTRACT
CA-2
R:\CIPlPROJECTS\PWQ2\PW02-01 Child MuselaTl1\PS&E'IContactdot
B. Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT. the CONTRACTOR shall
be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the DISTRICT on
forms provided by the DISTRICT.
C. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms
of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms
of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as
an acceptance of any part of the work.
D. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
E. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete. The District hereby delegates its authority to reduce
the retention to the Engineer.
7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to DISTRICT the sum
of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by DISTRICT.
CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify DISTRICT of any such delay.
8. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for compensation
as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount
of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the DISTRICT related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
. required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
9. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California. the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
CONTRACT
CA-3
R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW02lPW02-Cll Ctulll Museum\PS&BCootract.dot
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are available from the California
Department of Industrial Relations' Internet Web Site at http://www.dir.ca.gov.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation
of the provisions of the Contract.
10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT for
any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against the
project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final
payments due to the DISTRICT.
12. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to DISTRICT's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any District officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
CONTRACT
CA-4
R:\ClP\PROJECTS\PW{)2\PW02.Ql Child MusellTl\PS&E\Contractdot
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
16. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
17. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
18. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
19. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to
this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning
this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the
parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be
entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
20. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of
a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant convenants and agrees to their knowledge that no
board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether
contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business
of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such. interest
comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all
such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest
would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section
1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the
Government Code of the State of California.
21. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
CONTRACT
CA-5
R:\CIP\PROJECTSIPW02\PWONJ1 Child Musellll\PS&BContractdot
22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Mailing Address:
William G. Hughes
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Street Address:
William G. Hughes
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CONTRACT
CA-6
R;\ClP\PROJECTS\PWD2\PWOZ-Q1 ChDd MusellnlPS&E\Con\racttlot
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
R.E. Fleming Construction, Inc.
15415 Bear Valley
Hesperia, CA 92345
Phone (760) 949-1781
By:
Donna Fleming, President
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT
CA-?
R;\CIPlPROJECTS\PW02\PW02-01 Child Museumll'S&E\Conlract.dot
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE ~
CITY MANAGER I
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
General Manager/Board of Directors
Genie Roberts, Director of Financef
September 17, 2002
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
PREPARED BY:
Karen Jester, Assistant Finance Direct
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial
Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2002.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the
Community Services District for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2002. See the attached Financial
Statements for an analytical review of financial activity.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2002
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Combining Balance Sheet as of
June 30, 2002
and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balance
For The Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2002
(Unaudited)
Prepared by the Finance Department
T emecula Community Services District
Combining Balance Sheet
As of JWle 30, 2002
Parks & Service Service Service
Recreation Level A Level B Level C
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 1,457,752 $ 57,783 $ 433,417
Receivables 54,442 9,866 31,166
Due from other funds 17,433
T ota! assets $ 1,529,627 $ $ 67,649 $ 464,583
Liabilities and fWld balances:
Liabilities:
Other current liabilities $ 351,437 $ 144 $ 113,527
351,437 144 113,527
FWld balances:
Reserved
Designated 1,178,190 67,505 351,056
T ota! fund balances 1,178,190 67,505 351,056
T ota!liabilities
and fWld balances $ 1,529,627 $ $ 67,649 $ 464,583
Please note that these balances are unaudited
2
Temecula Community Services District
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2002
Service Service Debt
Level D Level R Service Total
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 1,551,485 $ 24,514 $ 2,695,564 $ 6,220,515
Receivables 73,802 919 27,033 197,228
Due from other funds 17,433
Total assets $ 1,625,287 $ 25,433 $ 2,722,597 $ 6,435,176
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Other current liabilities $ 1,521,687 $ 1,986,795
1,521,687 1,986,795
Fund balances:
Reserved 2,722,597 2,722,597
Designated 103,600 25,433 1,725,784
Total fuod balances 103,600 25,433 2,722,597 4,448,381
Total liabilities
and fund balances $ 1,625,287 $ 25,433 $ 2,722,597 $ 6,435,176
Please note that these balances are unaudited
3
T emecula Community Services District
Citywide Operations
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in FIDld Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended JIDle 30, 2002
Annual
Amended Y1D Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Special tax $ 2,626,000 $ 2,505,301 $ 2,505,301 95% (1)
TCSD admin fee creditl"REST" 2,117,000 2,117,000 2,117,000 100%
Recreation programs 515,000 606,168 606,168 118%
Investment interest 40,000 21,522 21,522 54%
Miscellaneous 266,000 130,9] 9 130,919 49%
Operating transfer in
Total Revenues 5,564,000 5,380,910 5,380,910 97%
Expenditures:
Parks, medians and arterial street lighting 3,6]8,240 3,320,543 $ 26,922 3,347,465 93%
Seniors 160,53] ]55,083 1,900 ]56,983 98%
Community Recreation Center (CRC) 426,830 395,354 395,354 93%
Recreation programs 440,885 368,2] 9 11 ,458 379,677 86%
Temecula Community Center (TCC) 137,850 111,768 6,000 117,768 85%
Museum 173,550 ]42,681 6,484 149,165 86%
Aquatics 384,24 ] 278,703 3,490 282,193 73%
Sports 170,920 ]27,403 ]27,403 75%
Children's Museum 38,000 16,315 ],100 ]7,415 46%
Operating transfers out 430,000 429,386 429,386 100%
Total Expenditures 5,981,047 5,345,455 $ 57,354 $ 5,402,809 90%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (417,047) 35,455
Beginning FIDld Balance, July], 2001 1,]42,735 1,]42,735
Ending FIDld Balance. JIDle 30, 2002 $ 725,688 $ 1,178,] 90
(1) Revenues are accrued on an availability basis. Final payment of revenues does not occur until October 2002 and does
not meet the availability criteria.
4
T emecula Conununity Services District
Service Level B
Residential Street Lights
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Assessments $ 420,000 $ 410,829 $ 410,829 98% (2)
Investment interest 2,000 667 667 33%
Street lighting fees 106,000 12,210 12,210 12% (1)
Miscellaneous 12,000 0 0%
Total Revenues 540,000 423,706 423,706 78%
Expenditures:
Salaries & wages 3,370 2,929 2,929 87%
Street lighting 596,100 451,718 451,718 76% (2)
Miscellaneous 20,000 7,895 7,895 39%
Total Expenditures 619,470 462,542 462,542 75%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (79,470) (38,836)
Beginning Fund Balance, July I, 2001 106,341. 106,341
Ending Fund Balance, June 30,2002 $ 26,871 $ 67,505
(I) The variance in Street lighting fees is due to no CSA 143, allocation was not calculated in time for FYOlI02.
Amount rebudgeted for FY 02103.
(2) Revenues are accrued on an availability basis. Final payment of revenues does not occur until October 2002 and does
not meet the availability criteria. However, street lighting payments are due irrespective of when assessment revenue
is received.
5
T emecula Community Services District
Service Level C
Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Food Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended Jooe 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Assessments $ 985,000 $ 962,076 $ 962,076 98% (2)
Investment interest 20,000 7,608 7,608 38%
Plan check and inspections 40,000 6,757 6,757 17%
Miscellaneous 12,000 0 0%
Total Revenues 1,057,000 976,441 976,441 92%
Expenditures:
Salaries and wages 184,880 141,210 141,210 76%
Landscape maintenance and rehab 630,000 581,270 9,852 591,122 94%
Utilities 260,000 202,677 202,677 78%
Other expenditures 126,500 56,983 56,983 45% (I)
Total Expenditures 1,201,380 982,140 9,852 991,992 83%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (144,380) (5,699)
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,2001 356,755 356,755
Ending Food Balance, Jooe 30, 2002 $ 212,375 $ 351,056
Notes:
(I) The variance is primarily due to lower than anticipated slope repair and maintenance costs, consulting services
and election costs being incurred.
(2) Revenues are accrued on an availability basis. Final payment ofrevenues does not occur until October 2002 and does
not meet the availability criteria.
6
T emecula Community Services District
Service Level D
Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended JundO, 2002
AIUlUal
Amended Y1D Tota! Percent
Budget Activity Encwnbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Assessments $ 3,030,000 $ 2,958,472 $ 2,958,472 98% (1)
Grants 15,000 15,471 15,471 ]03%
Investment interest 20,000 8,571 8,571 43%
Miscellaneous 5,000 22,619 22,619 452%
Total Revenues 3,070,000 3,005,133 3,005,133 98%
Expenditures:
Salaries and wages 26,240 24,927 24,927 95%
Refuse hauling 3,030,330 3,031,016 3,031,016 100% (1)
Other expenditures 37,740 35,406 $ 35,406 94%
Tota! Expenditures 3,094,310 3,091,349 0 3,091,349 100%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (24,310) (86,216)
Begiruting Fund Balance, July I, 2001 189,816 189,816
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002 $ 165,506 $ 103,600
(1) Revenues are accrued on an availability basis. Final pa)TI1ent of revenues does not occur until October 2002 and does
not meet the availability criteria. However, refuse hauling payments are due in June or July each year irrespective of when
assessment revenue is received. TIris causes the 2% difference between revenues and corresponding expenditures.
7
Temecula Community Services District
Service Level R
Streets and Roads
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fwd Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended Jwe 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YID Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Assessments $ 12,000 $ 11,453 $ 11.453 95% (1)
Investment interest 1,000 592 592 59%
Total Revenues 13,000 12,045 12,045 93%
Expenditures:
Emergency street maintenance 17,080 4,800 $ 4,800 28%
Other expenditmes 80 48 48 60%
Total Expenditures 17,160 4,848 0 4,848 28%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (4,160) 7,197
Beginning Fwd Balance, July 1, 2001 18,236 18,236
Ending Fwd Balance, Jwe 30,2002 $ 14,076 $ 25,433
(1) Revenues are accrued on an availability basis. Final payment of revenues does not occur wtil October 2002 and does
not meet the availability criteria.
8
Temecula Community Services District
Debt Service Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended Total Percent
Budget Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Operating transfers in $ 430,000 $ 429,386 100%
Investment interest 35,000 56,731 162%
Bond Procees 6,454,000 6,454,313 100%
Total Revenues 6,919,000 6,940,430
Expenditures:
Debt service - principal 225,000 225,000 100%
Debt service - interest 215,500 216,350 100%
Bond Costs 275,680 274,415 100%
Payment to escrow agent 4,008,720 4,008,254 100%
Other expenditures 6,300 5,430 86%
Operating transfers out 700,000 0% (I)
Total Expenditures 5,431,200 4,729,449 87%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 1,487,800 2,210,981
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,2001 511,616 511,616
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002 $ 1,999,416 $ 2,722,597
(I) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when CFD Bond funded
project(s) (Sports Complex) are started and costs are incurred. Sports Complex is also
funded by DIF - Parks/Rec ($319K in the current year).
9
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 27, 2002
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:33
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
Comerchero
ABSENT:
o
AGENCY MEMBER:
None
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 13, 2002.
MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item NO.1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comment.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
R:\Minutes.rda\081302
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:33 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, September 17, 2002, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes.rda\081302
2
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY A TIORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE ~
CITY MANAGER__
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Genie Roberts, Director of Fin~nc~
September 17, 2002
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
PREPARED BY:
Karen Jester, Assistant Finance Direc~
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Members:
1. Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002;
2. Increase the Debt Service bond proceeds revenue estimate by $23,586,600;
3. Increase the Debt Service Fund appropriation for refunding bonds by $12,044,100;
4. Increase the Debt Service Fund appropriation for cost of issuance by $997,300.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity ofthe
Redevelopment Agency for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2002. See the attached Financial
Statements for an analytical review of financial activity.
The increase in the revenue and expenditures is primarily due to the refinance of the Tax Allocation
Bonds (TAB). The 1993 TABs were refinanced and the life of the bonds was extended in May 2002,
which resulted in additional bond proceeds and costs of issuance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2002
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2002
and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance For The Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2002
(Unaudited)
Prepared by the Finance Department
CITY OF TEMECULA
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Agency Members
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~
DATE: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT: Replacement pages for attachments
Attached please find replacement pages for Redevelopment Agency consent calendar item #2. The
originally submitted pages reflected the amended budget figures prior to the Agency Member
approval. Please contact me if you need additional clarification.
R:\ROBERTSGIMEMOSIFINANCIALS63002RDASUPPLEMENTAL.DOC
9/16/02
T emecula Redevelopment Agency
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30,2002
LowlMod Redevelopment Debt
Fund Fund Service Total
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 6,981,580 $ ],376,117 $ ]8,]73,93] $ 26,53],628
Receivables 1,606,431 330,297 ]42,679 2,079,407
Land held for resale 2,103,053 2,103,053
Total assets $ 8,588,011 $ 3,809,467 $ 18,316,610 $ 30,714,088
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Other current liabilities $ 32,948 $ 407,439 $ 6,001,250 $ 6,441,637
Deferred revenue 943,704 ] 57,059 ],100,763
T otalliabilities 976,652 564,498 6,001,250 7,542,400
Fund balances:
Reserved 7,611,359 $ 12,315,360 ] 9,926,719
Designated 3,244,969 3,244,969
Total flmd balances 7,611,359 3,244,969 12,315,360 23,171,688
Total liabilities
and fund balances $ 8,588,011 $ 3,809,467 $ 18,316,610 $ 30,714,088
Please note that these balances are unaudited
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Food Balance - Budget and Actual
Redevelopment Agency Low/Moderate Income Housing
For the Fiscal Year Ended Jooe 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Total Percent
Budget Activity Encwnbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Property tax increment $ 2,084,234 $ 2,125,311 $ 2,125,311 102% (I)
Investment interest 165,000 205,108 205,108 124%
Rental income 30,000 40,706 40,706 136%
Miscellaneous 7,000 254,078 254,078 3630% (4)
Total Revenues 2,286,234 2,625,203 2,625,203 115%
Expenditures:
Salaries and wages 196,310 182,404 182,404 93%
Operating and administrative expenditures 297,953 231,043 231,043 78% (2)
COooty Admin Fees 32,475 32,475 (5)
Hornebuyer programs 200,000 120 120 0%
Residential rehabilitation programs 1,086,664 233,975 45,756 279,731 26%
Housing development & acquisition 3,963,451 28,331 26,511 54,842 ]% (3)
Affordable housing I future obligation 1,407,000 1,101,512 1,101,512 78%
Total Expenditures 7,151,378 1,809,860 72,267 1,882,127 26%
Revenues Over/CUncler) Expenditures (4,865,144) 815,343
Beginning Food Balance, July 1, 2001 6,796,016 6,796,016
Ending Food Balance, Jooe 30, 2002 $ 1,930,872 $ 7,611,359
Notes:
(1) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May each fiscal year.
(2) The variance in operating and administrative expenditures is primarily due to lower than anticipated consulting
costs and other outside services being incurred.
(3) Minimal costs have been incurred to date on the Senior Housing and Northwest Housing and Pujol Neighborhood
projects.
(4) There were $235K First Time Homebuyer forgiveable loans made during the year.
(5) This is 20% portion OfCOOOty Admin Fees. The full amooot is budgeted in RDA CIP Food.
2
City of T emecula Redevelopment Agency
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Redevelopment Agency- Redevelopment
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YfD Total Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Investment interest $ 30,000 $ 37,519 $ 37,519 125% (I)
Rental income 180,000 180,000 180,000 100%
Loan interest 14,000 12,384 12,384 88%
Reimbursements 125,682 125,682 125,682 100%
Operating transfers in 1,020,375 808,000 808,000 79% (3)
Miscellaneous 6,702 6,702
Total Revenues 1,370,057 1,170,287 1,170,287 85%
Capital Projects (4):
Public Restrooms Adjacent to O.T. 1,223 127 127 10%
First Street bridge 289,347 222,414 $ 69,617 292,031 101%
General Contractor 21,617
OT S. Gateway Landscape 50,000 4,818 6,072 10,890 22%
Old Town central parking lot
Operations and Maintenance:
Salaries and wages 80,040 76,826 76,826 96%
Operating and administrative expenditures 446,182 260,567 3,308 263,875 59% (3)
Owner participation agreements 300,000 300,000 300,000 100%
Old Town plan implementation 105,980 84,277 84,277 80%
Old Town development incentives 200,000 (2)
Old Town building facades 140,545 115,674 19,301 134,975 96%
Total Expenditures 1,634,934 1,064,703 98,298 1,163,001 71%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (264,877) 105,584
BegilU1ing Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 3,139,385 3,139,385
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2002 $ 2,874,508 $ 3,244,969
Notes:
(1) The variance in investment interest is due to higher than anticipated cash balances being
maintained during the fiscal year.
(2) No costs have yet been incwred for providing development incentives in Old Town.
(3) Budget includes County Admin Fees and a corresponding Transfer In from RDA Debt Service.
County Admin Fees were recorded in RDA Debt Service and Low/Mod Housing Funds (80%/20%).
3
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Redevelopment Agency - Debt Service
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
Annual
Amended YTD Percent
Budget Activity of Budget
Revenues:
Property tax increment $ 8,336,940 $ 8,501,242 102% (1)
Investment interest 150,000 288,085 192%
Advances from other funds 72,932 (6)
Bond Proceeds 4,300,000 27,886,585 649% (3)
Total Revenues 12,786,940 36,748,844 287%
Expenditures:
Passthrough agreements 5,715,830 11,004,008 193% (2)
County Admin Fees 129,899 (5)
Debt service w principal 990,000 765,000 77%
Debt service - interest 682,140 755,072 111%
Bond Costs 997,217 (3)
Payment to escrow agent 12,044,032 (4)
Miscellaneous 7,500 7,498 100%
Operating transfers out 2,808,055 1,508,000 54%
Total Expenditures 10,203,525 27,210,726 267%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 2,583,415 9,538,118
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,2001 2,777,242 2,777,242
Ending Fund Balance, June 30,2002 $ 5,360,657 $ 12,315,360
Notes:
(I) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May each fiscal year.
(2) The variance in the passthrough agreements expenditure is due to a renegotiation
of the county's passthrough agreement.
(3) New bonds were issued in FYOI/02.
(4) Old honds were defeased in FYOl/02.
(5) This is 80% portion of County Admin Fees. The full amount is budgeted in RDA C1P Fund.
(6) The advance was not budgeted as it was anticipated the advance would be fully repaid during FYOl/02.
4
TEMECULA PUBLIC
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUGUST 13, 2002
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public Financing Authority was called to order at
7:39 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5
BOARD MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone,
and Roberts
ABSENT:
o
BOARD MEMBER:
None
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 9, 2002;
MOTION: Board Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item NO.1. The motion was
seconded by Board Member Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
AUTHORITY BUSINESS
2 Issuance of Bonds for Temecula Public Financinq Authoritv Community Facilities District No.
01-2 (Harveston)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 02-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BONDS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY FOR
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 01-2 (HARVESTON), APPROVING
AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF AN INDENTURE OF
TRUST AND APPROVING OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS
AND ACTIONS
R:m in utes. tpfa\040902
Finance Director Roberts reviewed the staff report (of record).
MOTION: Board Member Comerchero moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Board Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Nelson noted that the $5 million improvements will be constructed on Winchester
Road and completed prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Harveston Development.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
Board Member Stone clarified that through this bonding, the City will not be jeopardizing the City
Treasury but that it will provide the infrastructure which will be a benefit to the entire community.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:42 P.M., the Temecula Public Financing Authority meeting was formally adjourned.
Ron Roberts, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:min utes. tpfa\040902
2
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FI~
CITY MANAGER /'k)
. /f
CITY OF TEMECULA
and
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/temecula Public Financing Authority
FROM: City Manager/Executive Director
DATE: September 17,2002
SUBJECT: Initial Actions Relating to Formation of Community Facilities District for Crown Hill
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the City Council adopt the resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
2. That the Authority adopt the resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGING
RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO THE FORMATION OF A
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
BACKGROUND: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (the "Developer") has requested that a
community facilities district be formed to assist in the financing of publiC improvements in the
Crown Hill area. The City and the Redevelopment Agency created the Authority, by execution
of a joint exercise of powers agreement, to provide an independent governmental entity that
could consider the proposed community facilities district financings and act as the issuer of any
related bonds.
It is expected that the Authority will consider the adoption of a resolution related to the formation
of a community facilities district. The CFD will only include land owned or controlled by the
Developer or other properties owners that consent to be included in the CFD. The Developer
has requested that the CFD issue bonds to finance certain public improvements so that
development of the land can proceed.
The Developer has agreed to pay all City and Authority costs related to the proposed CFD
formation and bond issue, and a deposiUreimbursement agreement has been prepared with
respect thereto. The bonds would be payable solely from special taxes levied on land in the
CFD and collected by the Authority.
SPECIFIC ACTIONS: In order to begin the process to consider the formation of the community
facilities district and the issuance of the bonds, the City Council will consider adoption of a
resolution approving a deposiUreimbursement agreement, and the Authority will then consider
adoption of a resolution accepting the Developer's deposit, approving a deposiUreimbursement
agreement with the City and the Developer and engaging professionals to assist the City and
the Authority in forming the CFD and issuing bonds of the Authority for the CFD.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Developer has agreed to pay all out of pocket expenses incurred
relative to the proposed CFD formation. Costs of issuance of the proposed bond issue will be
paid from the proceeds of the bonds to be issued by the Authority. All annual costs of
administering the bond issued will be paid by special taxes levied on the properties in the
community facilities district.
Any CFD bonds will not be obligations of the City, but will be limited obligations of the Authority,
payable solely fFem special taxes levied on land in the community facilities district.
Attachments:
Resolutions (2)
DeposiUReimbursement Agreement
DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 03-1
(Crown Hill)
THIS DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is by and among
the City of Temecula (the "City"), the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") for
itself and on behalf of the proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities
District No. 03-1 (Crown Hill) (the "CFD"), and Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (the
"Developer").
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that the Authority consider the issuance of
bonds for the CFD (the "Bonds") under Sections 53311 et seq. of the California Government
Code (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, the Developer is willing to deposit funds with the City to ensure payment of
the costs of the Authority and the City in forming the Authority and otherwise in connection with
the issuance of bonds for the CFD and the proposed expenditure of the proceeds thereof,
provided that such funds so advanced are reimbursed to the Developer from the proceeds of
any bonds issued by the Authority for the CFD to the extent provided herein; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and the Developer now desire to specify the terms of said
deposit and reimbursement.
AGREEMENT:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants set
forth herein, and for other consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. The Deposit: Additional Advances. The Developer is, concurrently with its
execution of this Agreement, delivering to the City's Finance Director $120,000.00 (the
"Deposit"), to be used by the City to pay the costs in conducting proceedings for the issuance of
bonds for the CFD (as more fully described in Section 2(a) below, the "Initial Costs"), said
amount being in the form of a check made payable to the "City of Temecula." The City, by its
execution hereof, acknowledges receipt by the City of the Deposit. The check representing the
Deposit will be cashed by the City, and the Deposit may be commingled with other funds of the
City for purposes of investment and safekeeping, but the City shall at all times maintain records
as to the expenditure of the Deposit.
The Developer hereby agrees to advance any additional amounts necessary to pay any
Initial Costs incurred by the City or the Authority, in excess of the amount of the Deposit,
promptly upon written demand therefore by the Finance Director of the City; provided that the
amount of the Deposit, plus any such additional amounts (th~ "Additional Deposits" and,
collectively with the Deposit, the "Deposits"), shall not exceed $200,000 without the prior written
consent of the Developer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Manager may direct City and
Authority staff and consultants to cease all work related to the issuance of the Bonds and/or the
formation of the Authority and the CFD until any additional amounts so demanded has been
received by the City.
Section 2. Use of Funds. The Deposits shall be administered as follows:
(a) The Finance Director of the City may draw upon the Deposits from time to time to
pay the Initial Costs, including but not limited to: (i) the fees and expenses of any consultants to
the City or the Authority employed in connection with the issuance of the Bonds and the
proposed expenditure of the proceeds thereof (such as engineering, legal counsel, including
the City Attorney, Bond Counsel and financing and special tax consultants); (ii) the costs of
appraisals, market absorption and feasibility studies and other reports necessary or deemed
advisable by City staff or consultants in connection with the Bonds; (iii) costs of publication of
notices, preparation and mailing of ballots and other costs related to any election with respect to
the CFD, the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes to be levied therein and
any bonded indebtedness thereof; (iv) a reasonable charge for City staff time, as determined by
the City Manager in his sole discretion, in analyzing the CFD, the eonds and the expenditure of
the proceeds thereof, including a reasonable allocation of City overhead expense related
thereto; and (v) any and all other actual costs and expenses incurred by the City or the
Authority with respect to the CFD or the Bonds after the date of execution of this Agreement.
The Developer hereby acknowledges that, at a minimum, the following amounts will or may be
charged against the Deposits, whether or not the CFD is formed and the Bonds are issued: (i)
up to $30,000.00 to Albert A. Webb Associates, special tax consultant, (ii) up to $30,000.00 to
an appraiser, (iii) up to $12,000.00 to Richards, Watson & Gershon, City Attorney and general
counsel to the Authority, (iv) up to $15,000.00 for a market absorption analysis related to the
CFD, (v) up to $20,000.00 to Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates for financial advisory services, and
(vi) up to $13,000.00 to the City for City Staff time in analyzing the CFD, the Bonds and the
expenditure of the proceeds thereof, including a reasonable allocation of City overhead
expense related thereto, including all other actual costs and expenses incurred by the City.
(b) If the -Bonds are issued under the Act by the Authority secured by spec.ial taxes
levied upon the land within the CFD, the Authority shall provide for reimbursement to the
Developer,without interest, of all amounts charged against the Deposits, said reimbursement to
be made solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted
under the Act. On or within ten (10) business days after the date of issuance and delivery of
the Bonds, the Finance Director of the City shall return the then unexpended Deposits to the
Developer, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs incurred by the City or the
Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to pay, which costs would be
subject to payment under Section 2(a) above, but have not yet been so paid.
(c) If the Bonds are not issued, the Finance Director of the City shall, within ten (10)
business days after adoption of the resolution stating the intent of the Authority to terminate
proceedings under the Act with respect to the issuance of the Bonds, return the then
unexpended Deposits to the Developer, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs
incurred by the City or the Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to
pay, which costs would be subject to payment under Section 2(a) above but have not yet been
so paid.
Section 3. Reimbursement of Other Developer Costs. Nothing contained herein shall
prohibit reimbursement of other costs and expenses of the Developer or any successor in
-2-
interest thereto with respect to the land in the CFD incurred in connection with the CFD from the
proceeds of the Bonds, including, but not limited to fees and expenses of legal counsel to the
Developer and/or its successor in interest and special consultant expenses. Any such
reimbursement shall be made solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent
otherwise permitted under the Act and otherwise provided for, at the reasonable discretion of
the Authority, in the proceedings for the issuance of the Bonds.
Section 4. Aoreement Not Debt or Liability of Citv or Authority. It is hereby
acknowledged and agreed that this Agreement is not a debt or liability of the City or the
Authority, as provided in Section 53314.9(b) of the Act. Neither the City nor the Authority shall
in any event be liable hereunder other than to return the unexpended and uncommitted portions
of the Deposits as provided in Section 2 aboye and provide an accounting under Section 7
below. Neither the City nor the Authority shall be obligated to adyance any of their own funds
with respect to the CFD or for any of the other purposes listed in Section 2(a) hereof. No
member of the City Council, the Board of Directors of the Authority or officer, employee or
agent of the City or the Authority shall to any extent be personally liable hereunder.
Section 5. No Oblioation to Issue Bonds. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no
way obligate the City or the Authority to issue any bonds, or to expend any of their own funds in
connection with the CFD.
Section 6. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be
given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible.
Section 7. Accountina. The City Finance Director shall provide the Developer with a
written accounting of moneys expended under this Agreement, within ten (10) business days of
receipt by the Finance Director of the City of a written request therefor submitted by an
authorized officer of the Developer. No more than one accounting will be provided in any
calendar month and the cost of providing the accounting shall be charged to the Deposits.
Section 8. Successors and Assions. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
-3-
Section 9. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original.
*****.**
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year written alongside their signature line below.
Executed on:
September 17, 2002
DEVELOPER:
LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
By:
Its:
Executed on:
September 17, 2002
CITY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager
Executed on:
September 17, 2002
AUTHORITY:
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, for
itself and on behalf of the proposed Temecula
Public Financing Authority Community Facilities
District 03-1 (Crown Hill)
By:
Shawn D. Nelson, Executive Director
-4-
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO
THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT,
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH
RESPECT THERETO
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (the "Developer") has submitted to the
Finance Director of the City of Temecula (the "City") monies (the "Deposit") to be used by the
City to pay costs of the City and the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") in
connection with proceedings under Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code
(the "Act") to create a community facilities district to be designated "Temecula Public Financing
Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-1 (Crown Hill)" (the "CFD"); and
WHEREAS, there has also been submitted a DeposiVReimbursement Agreement (the
"Agreement"), among the Developer, the City of Temecula and the Authority, and this Board of
Directors now desires to accept the money advanced by the Developer, to authorize the
execution and delivery by the Authority of the Agreement, employ certain consultants necessary
for the formation of the CFD and the sale of bonds of the Authority for the CFD, and authorize
and direct Authority staff to take actions necessary to present to this Board of Directors for
approval the documents necessary to form the CFD and issue bonds of the Authority for the
CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Public Financing Authority as follows:
Section 1. The Director of Finance of the City of Ternecula is hereby authorized and
directed to accept the Deposit, and to use the Deposit in the manner contemplated by the
Agreement. The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to
execute the Agreement for and on behalf of the Authority, and to take all actions necessary, in
his discretion, to implement the Agreement.
Section 2. City staff, acting for and on behalf of the Authority, are hereby authorized
and directed to take all actions necessary or advisable to present to the Board of Directors for
its review and approval all proceedings necessary to create the CFD and issue bonds of the
Authority therefore. The passage of this Resolution shall in no way obligate this Board of
Directors to form the CFD or issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD.
Section 3. The firm of Stone & Youngberg LLC is hereby designated as underwriter to
the Authority for any bonds to be issued for the CFD.
Section 4. The firm of Albert A. Webb Associates is hereby designated as Special Tax
Consultant to the Authority for the CFD, the firm of Fieldman Rolapp & Associates is hereby
designated as financial advisor to the Authority for the CFD, the firm of McFarlin & Anderson is
hereby designated as disclosure counsel to the Authority for the CFD, and the firm of Quint &
Thimmig LLP is hereby designated as Bond Counsel to the Authority for the CFD. The
Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute agreements with said firms for
A:frPFA Aesos 2002/02-_
their services in connection with the CFD, in form and substance acceptable to the Executive
Director. The fees and expenses of such consultants shall be payable solely from the Deposit
and lor the proceeds of bonds, if any, issued by the Authority for the CFD.
Section 5. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to engage an
appraiser to appraise the property subject to the special taxes to be levied within the CFD, and
a market absorption consultant to analyze the proposed development in the CFD, on such
terms as are acceptable to the Executive Director. The fees and expenses of such consultants
shall be payable solely from the Deposit and lor the proceeds of bonds, if any, issued by the
Authority for the CFD.
Section 6. The Executive Director, Treasurer, Secretary, legal counsel to the Authority
and all other officers and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to take all
actions necessary or advisable to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the 17'h day of September, 2002.
Ron Roberts, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Authority Secretary
[SEAL]
-2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 02-_ was duly adopted at a regular
meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 17'h day of
September, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
BOARDMEMBERS:
BOARDMEMBERS:
BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk /Authority Secretary
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (the "Developer") has requested that the
Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") form a community facilities district in the
Crown Hill area of the City of Temecula (the "City"), and has advanced funds to pay costs of the
City and the Authority related thereto; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a DeposiVReimbursement Agreement with the
Authority and the Developer (the "Deposit Agreemenf'), regarding the disposition of funds
advanced by the Developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. Deposit Aqreement. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the
City Manager to execute and deliver the Deposit Agreement, in the form on file with the City
Clerk together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Attorney, the approval of
such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the City of the
Deposit Agreement.
Section 2. Official Actions. The Mayor, City Manager, City Clerk and all other officers
of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or
desirable hereunder with respect to the implementation of the Deposit Agreement, including but
not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and
other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable and not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, at
a regular meeting held on the 17th day of September, 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R: Resos2002/02-_
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 02-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 17'" day of September, 2002, by the following roll call vote:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
AYES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:Resos2002/02-~
2
ITEM 15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER CJJ
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/CitY?f~
Debbie Ubnoske~r~ctor of Planning
FROM:'
DATE:
SUBJECT:
September 17, 2002
Villages of Temecula General Plan Amendment (PAOO-0138); Change of Zone
(PAOO-0139); Development Plan (PAOO-0140); Tentative Parcel Map (PAOO-
0152)
PREPARED BY: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
1. ADOPT a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
BASED ON THE INITIAL STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
2. ADOPT a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0138, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REALIGN
THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (M) LAND-USE DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES
OF A 23 ACRE SITE; GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO(S). 944-290-012, 013, AND 014, BASED UPON THE
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF
REPORT.
RID P\2000l00-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
1
3. READ by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO.02-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PAOO-
0139, A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
(PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO), AND ADOPTING THE
STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE
ACCOMPANYING PDO DOCUMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED
SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC
ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION
OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012, 013,014.
4. ADOPT a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0140, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 160 UNIT
APARTMENT COMPLEX AND EIGHT RETAIL I OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 68,700 SQUARE FEET, GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST
OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012, 013, AND 014.
5. ADOPT a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0152 - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 29140
SUBDIVIDING THE SITE FROM 3 LOTS INTO 8 LOTS,
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE
MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S), 944-290-012,
013, AND 014.
BACKGROUND:
The Villages of Temecula project is located south of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic
Road and east of the Moraga Road / Rancho California Road intersection. The project includes
three (3) Assessor Parcel number(s), 944-290-012, 013 and 014. In 1993, upon adoption of the
City's General plan the property was designated Professional Office (PO) and Medium Density
RID P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
2
Residential (7-12 du/ac). In 1995, the City adopted the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map
and Development Code, which designated Assessor Parcel number(s) 944-290-012 and 013 as
Professional Office (PO) and 944-290-014 as Medium (M) D~nsity Residential.
The first application, PAOO-0138, is a proposal for a General Plan Amendment to realign the
Professional Office (PO) and Medium Density Residential (M) land-use designation boundaries,
which will also increase the gross acreage of the residential area by 5.03 acres (with a
corresponding decrease in the Professional Office area). The second application, PAOO-0139,
is a request for a Zoning Map Amendment from Professional Office (PO) and Medium Density
Residential (M) to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) and the adoption of the standards and
regulations contained in the PDO document. The third application, PAOO-0140, is an application
to construct a 160 unit multi-family residential complex on approximately 15.26 acres (which
equates to 10.5 du/ac) and nine (9) retail/office buildings, totaling approximately 68,700 square
feet on 7.71 acres. The final application, PAOO-0152, is a proposal for a Tentative Parcel Map
to subdivide the site into eight parcels.
Summary of Public Participation
The Planning Department has held two Community Meetings for this project. The first
Community Meeting was held on February 9, 2001. Approximately 30 people attended this
meeting. A second Community Meeting was held on January 14, 2002 to review revised plans.
Approximately 20 people were in attendance, including City Staff and project representatives.
Both meetings were open for questions and there was some concern expressed about
neighborhood compatibility.
On February 20, 2002 the Planning Commission held a pUblic hearing, and all property owners
and tenants within 600 feet of the project site were notified via a mailed public notice. A number
of issues were raised during the hearing procedures as summarized below.
On March 18, 2002, planning staff met with two homeowners from the Starlight Ridge
subdivision. A number of issues and concerns were voiced by these two residents regarding
lighting, sound attenuation, sight, grading and property boundaries. These concerns have been
transmitted in writing to the applicant.
On May 7, 2002, staff met again with two neighborhood representatives to discuss the project.
DISCUSSION
Planning Commission Hearing and Issues
At the Planning Commission hearing, three members of the public spoke in favor of the project
and five members of the public spoke against the project. After closing the pUblic hearing and
discussing the applications, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the following
approvals by the City Council:
Environmental:
Unanimous recommendation to adopt the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
General Plan
Amendment:
Unanimous recommendation to approve.
R:ID P12000l00-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
3
Development Plan:
Three to two (3-2) recommendation to approve. (Commissioner
Guerriero and Commissioner Mathewson voting against because
of the gas station) with the following conditions:
. Approve the Service Station as proposed.
. Planning Commission to review architectural design of the
apartments at a future public hearing.
. Residential Building #3 (Adjacent to Starlight Ridge) be
redesigned to reduce negative view impacts.
. That a tot lot be added to the residential project as deemed
appropriate by staff.
. That the project participate in the Crime Free Multi-
Housing Program.
. That the trees on the easterly portion of the site of the site
be increased in size.
. That a walkway be constructed for pedestrian access on
the easterly portion of the site.
. And, as a separate request, for staff and the City Attorney
to develop an amenity fee to satisfy the Growth
Management Plan requirements for amenities, to be
reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council.
Tentative Map:
Unanimous recommendation to approve.
Subsequent to the Planning Commission action on this item, the applicant held several
meetings with staff and concerned citizens regarding the design of the project. As a result of
these discussions, the applicant has revised the site plan. Staff recommends the Council
continue this item to allow staff time to review the revisions and make any necessary changes to
the conditions of approval, Resolutions and Ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
1. Draft Resolution adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration/Mitigation Monitoring
Plan
2. Draft Resolution approving a General Plan Amendment
3. Draft Ordinance approving Zone Change and PDO document
4. Draft Resolution approving Development Plan
5. Draft Resolution approving a Tentative Parcel Map
6. Planning Commission Minutes
7. Planning Commission Staff Report and Exhibits
8. Letters received
R:\d p\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\CC Agenda Report.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO.1
DRAFT RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:\D P\2000l00-0140 Village of Temecula\CC Agenda Report.doc
5
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
BASED ON THE INITIAL STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR PAOO-
0138, PAOO-0139, PAOO-0140 AND PAOO-0152, GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST
OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012,013, AND 014.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
declare that:
C.
D.
E.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
A.
MJW Property Group filed Planning Application Nos. PAOO-0138, General
Plan Amendment, PAOO-0139, Zone Change, PAOO-0140, Development
Plan, and PAOO-0152, Tentative Parcel Map, for the property consisting of
approximately 23 acres and generally located south of Rancho California
Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Moraga Road intersection of
Rancho California Road known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 944-290-01 2,
013, AND 014 ("Project"). .
B.
The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental
review was conducted as required by law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
pUblic hearing on February 20, 2002 to consider the applications for the
Project and environmental review. /
Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-003 approving a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the
Project, Tentative Parcel Map and Development Plan for the Project and
recommended that the City Council approve of a General Plan
Amendment and zone change for the Project.
On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested
in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on
these matters.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project and all comments received regarding the Mitigated
R:/Resos 2002lResos 02-_
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program and, based on the whole record before
it, finds, determines and declares that:
A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's
local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study
(Environmental Assessment No. EA- _) of the potential environmental
effects of the proposed Project. Based upon the findings contained in that
Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that
the project could have a significant effect on the environment and a
Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. A copy of the Initial
Study and Negative Declaration are attached hereto as Exhibit "An and
incorporated herein by reference.
B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required
by law and copies of the documents have been available for public review
and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community
Development, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
Ca. 92589.
C. The City Council reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all
comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The
Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration were discussed at a
public hearing of the City Council held on June 25, 2002.
D: The Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with
CEQA
E. There is no substantial evidence that the Project, as conditioned, will
have a significant effect on the environment.
F. The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the City Council.
G. The Mitigation Monitoring Plan set forth in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been prepared in accordance with law.
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the Project and approves the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the
Project.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a Notice of
Determination describing the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Program by the City Council in the Offices of the County Clerk of the County of
Riverside in accordance with the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
R:/Resos 2002/Resos 02-_ 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 02-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:lResos 2002lResos 02._
3
EXHIBIT A
INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION
a.,
.. .
City of Temecula
P.O, Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Project Title Temecula Village Development
Lead Agency Name and City of T emecula
Address P.O. Box 9033,
TemecuJa, CA 92589-9033
Contact Person and Phone Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
Number (909) 694-6400
Project Location The south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of
the intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive. Unsectioned
land within T8S, R3W, located on the USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle,
San Bernardino Base and Meridian. IAPN # 944-290-012,013,014)
Project Sponsor's Name and TV Development, LP
Address c/o Markham Development Management Group, Inc.
41750 Winchester Road, Suite N
Temecula, CA 92590
General Plan Designation Professional Office (12.74 acres)
Medium Densitv Residential (7-12 dwellino units/acre) 110.23 acres)
Zoning Same as General Plan
Description of Project The Project consists of the following planning applications:
1. PAOO-0138 proposes a General Plan Amendment which will reorient the
current north / south boundaries of (PO) Professional Office (12.74 acres)
and (M) Medium Density (10.23 acres) to an east / west orientation of 7.71
acres of (PO) Professional Office and 15.26 acres of (M) Medium Density.
2. PAOO-0139 proposes a Zoning Amendment which overlays the current
zoning of (PO) Professional Office and (M) Medium Density with a mixed-
use office/retail (PDO-5) Planned Development Overlay.
3. PAOO-0152 proposes a Tentative Parcel Map subdividing the current
three parcels, which are a portion of lot 24 of Tract 3334, into 8 individual
parcels.
4. PAOO-0140 proposes to construct 160 attached single-family residential
units on approximately 15.26 acres. The apartment buildings will consist of
two-story structures with stucco exteriors consisting of simple horizontal or
gabled parapets. The project also proposes 71,100 square foot of single
story and two-story office/retail space on approximately 7.71 acres. Access
to the proiect site will be from Rancho California Road.
Surrounding Land Uses and Rancho California Road serves as the north boundary of the project site,
Setting with commercial and multi-family development located on the .north side of
the road. Single-family residential uses are located to the east and south.
Undeveloped open area, approved by the City for multi-family residential
use is located to the west.
Other pubic agencies whose The only other agency approval that may be required is an incidental take
approval is required permit (ITP) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No stream channels
are located on this ridge located south of Rancho California Road, therefore
an Army Corps 404 Permit or Department of Fish and Game 1603
Agreement appears not to be required. No Regional Board approvals are
reauired.
R:\D P\2000\OO.Ol40 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
: '
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
imoact that is a "Potentiallv Sionificant Imoact' as indicated b\l the checklist on the followino Paaes.
Land Use Planning X Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Population and Housing Noise
X Geology and Soils Public Services
Water Utilities and Service Systems
Air Quality Aesthetics
Transportation/Circulation X Cultural Resources
X Biological Resources Recreation
Energy and Mineral Resources Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
R:\O P\2ooo\OO-o140 Village of Temeculallnnial Study.rtf
... k,,-o.
Determination
(To be comoleted bv the lead alJencvl
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be oreoared
X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to
bv the oroiect orooonent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be oreoared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is reouired
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed
in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a 'potentially
significant impact' or 'potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is reauired, but it must analvze on Iv the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imoosed unon the oroDosed oroiect, nothinn further is renuired.
Signature:~"'I?e:,~Date: ~ 7/ Zoo I
Printed Name: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner For: City of Temecula
R:\D P\2000\OO-O 140 Village of T emecula\lnitiaJ Study.rtf
'''', ".
~ \~>:::J/t-I -~r\S .
~ :!='ILZ- -C f'f-'~,< lI~ I \
~ ;!Ltf'\ K ~ '1\ \ I
, ~ I ~"'l<~1Sl1JrY1lTI--'\L
~~,,~ ~~J?;f f--
~ ~ ~8:q!~ ~)E:r Y\ 'i\~ ;::: p
Im!- W~ ~h p
II (m\y(!T nTTll'i ~ u.,\l~
~ >:'?-i IllllllllllmT T/A ~ ~ ~
~ I!g; K \\)\\"" ':;'~
~:i~~I; ij ~ \ ~IJ ~
~ ~~ ~
+-
m
<;:::11/
f::I
1"-
g
,]
___ TirE l
I _/_-(':" l - L "'" ~, :J -I
If:: , ~ / ~ "-. /7>-- cTIU "'- 111111
I'-V" \ ~ n!-- '~~
_ j. !;0G "'~
'- '2~ ~ I
~ Y ~ '\
",l~ " \' ~\,[\\n\\l .
-)~ ~ .,- j,'
I " 1 F""" ~= ~<1
~.;.. d >= 'V '7)<. ~U
~ ~\ ""'/. 0./ >= '=
\ \"~_~ ,#<." ~ ~ ~E p ~ "--/1
~. ~ ~w ~~ IIZJ~
. ~ ~ ~ I ~
'~" ~ ""'- \\'ill ;;,,, ~../
~ ~ ,Jrg, Y' 'V- ~ ~, h" ~
~ ,'i~ v"~ P c '\ui I 'L c'~
;m II .Ih~ Ki ,/ 'T /J ~
'l.,
. .
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING, Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significatlt Significant Significant ,,,,,,",
,,,,,,,,, Unless Mitigation ,,,,,,,,,
I""'^""""rated
a. Physically divide an established community? X
b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation X
of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,
but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoidinQ or mitiQation an environmental effect?
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X
natural communitv conservation olan?
Comments:
1.a The project site is surrounded with urban/suburban development. Residential uses exist to the south and
east; multi-family residential development has been approved on the vacant property located immediately
to the west; and commercial development exists to the north of Rancho California Road which is one of
the major east-west arterials in the City of Temecula. The construction and occupancy of 160 residential
units and 71,100 square feet of office/retail on this approximate 22.97 -acre property will be an urban infill
development project. The type of project proposed and the location of the project eliminate any possibility
of causing adverse impact from physically dividing an established community.
1.b Based on the site's medium density residential and professional office designations, and the infill
character of the project site, the proposed Temecula Village project is consistent with the village center
and planned development overlay concepts presented in the General Plan and Development Code. The
proposed project does not pose any significant adverse land use impacts with implementation of required
mitigation. The project requires the approval of a General Plan Amendment and a Change of Zone.
Potential mitigation for other issues is discussed in the appropriate sections of this Initial Study. No
mitigation is required for land use issues beyond those that are already included in the proposed project
Planned Development Overlay.
1.c The project site constitutes an island of undeveloped property that is surrounded on all sides by urban
and suburban development. The site does contain disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) habitat, but it is
not identified in the City General Plan or any other agency plans as part of a habitat conservation plan or
a natural community conservation plan. Converting the property to suburban uses comparable to that
surrounding the site will require mitigation through acquisition of an incidental take permit from the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, but discussions with the Service biologists indicate that the appropriate solution
for this site is not to retain it as permanent habitat due to the surrounding level of development. If
mitigation is required based on the presence of the California Gnatcatcher, the Service Staff indicates that
it should be acquired offsite at a location determined suitable by the Service (See Biological Resources
Section).
R:\D P\200Q\tX)-()l40 Villaga of Temecula~n~ial Study.rtf
....
2: POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant ,,,,,oct
,,,,,oct Unl~~:tion '''''''''
'OCO od
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either X
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly {for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructurel?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X
construction of replacement housina elsewhere?
Comments:
2.a The City General Plan designated a total of 772 acres of medium density residential land use. The
proposed project will convert -15.26 acres of this designation to 160 apartment units. At an occupancy
rate of 2.83 persons per unit, the total population that will occupy this project at full occupancy is forecast
to be 453 persons. However, as Temecula Village is an infill project where many service needs of
residents are provided onsite, it is not forecast to induce population growth that will exceed the capacity of
roads, utilities, and other infrastructure anticipated in the General Plan. Additionally, the proposed
office/retail uses on site are only approximately two-thirds of the minimum FAR square footage
anticipated in the General Plan for this site (.21 compared to a minimum of .3), and 20% of the maximum
FAR (.21 compared to the maximum FAR of 1.0). Based on this evaluation, the proposed project is not
forecast to cause significant growth within the City of T emecula.
2.b The project site is presently unoccupied and the proposed project has no potential to displace any
existing housing. The project will provide critically needed apartment housing units for the City, and
equally important, the adjacent professional and commercial development can reduce the overall trip
generation by allowing pedestrian trips to replace vehicle trips.
2.c The project site is presently unoccupied and the proposed project has no potential to displace any
existing population. The project provides essential rental housing that will serve a portion of the City's
residents which relies upon this type of housing which is in very short supply within the City and
surrounding area
No mitigation is required.
R:\O P\20001OO-Q140 Village of Temeoula~n"ial Study.rtf
, ,
3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially less Than No
Significant Significant Significant In'O'CI
I"".., Unl~~~ation In-oact
Inco led
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial X
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involvino: .
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the X
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geoloav SDecial Publication 42.
iI) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
iii) Seismic-related ground failure. including liquefaction? X
iv) Landslides? X
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
c. Be IDeated on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
snreadinn, subsidence. Iiouefaction or collaDse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B X
of the Uniform BUild~~ Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or nronert .
e. Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of X
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Comments:
3.a A detailed description of the City's geology and soils is contained in Chapter 4.1 of the City's General
Plan Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR). According to the GPEIR. the City of Temecula is in Ground
shaking Zone II, which will experience moderate to intense ground shaking in the event of a major
regional earthquake. Geologic mitigation measure 5 is identified in Section 4.1.3 of the GPEIR and it is
deemed adequate to reduce potential ground shaking impacts to a level of no significance. No additional
m~igation is required.
A review of the City's Fault Hazard Zones in the General Plan (Figure 7-1) indicates that the project site is
not located within a fault hazard zone and it has a very low probability of being exposed to fault rupture.
A review of the City's SubsidencelLiquefaction Hazards in the General Plan (Figure 7-2) indicates that the
project site is not located within a zone of potential subsidence or liquefaction. The proposed project has
a very IDW probability of being exposed to these geologic hazards.
Although the project site is located on a low ridge, no landslides were observed on the property proposed
for development. A geotechnical investigation by CHJ Incorporated reached this same conclusion. A
copy of this geotechnical study is available at the City Planning Department office for review if desired.
The lack of observed landslides, the low vertical relief of the site, and the shallow slopes would indicate a
low potential for being exposed to significant landslide hazards on this project site.
3.b Development of the project site will expose it to potential erosion and downstream sedimentation. The
General Plan requires mitigation for project to control erosion. Further, specific requirements have been
established under the state-wide NPDES program that requires every project to implement a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction and over the long-term. Best Management
Practices (BMPs) are identified in the SWPPP to control erosion on a site and any sedimentation
A:\D P\2000\oo...()140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
-."
generated by disturbing the site for development. Mitigation is required to control potential erosion and
sedimentation. The following standard City condition of approval shall be implemented.
S.b.l The SWPPP prepared for this project shall implement BMPs identified in the County's
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the performance standard that must be
met is to minimize erosion on the site in accordance with DAMP BMPs and to contain all
eroded sediment on the project site.
3.c As noted under issue 3.a, the project site has a minimal potential for any instability reiated to subsidence,
liquefaction, or landslides.
3.d Based on a review of the General Plan, the Friant-Lodo-Escondido Association underlies the site and it
has no potential to be expansive or create hazards related to expansive soils.
3.e The project site will be served by a sewer collection system so there is no potential for the site to have
adverse impacts related to use of subsurface wastewater disposal systems.
Implementation of mitigation measure #5 (General Plan) in the General Plan for ground shaking impacts and
measure 3.b.l for erosion/sedimentation impacts will reduce the only potentially significant geology and soil
impacts to a level of no significance.
R:\D P\20001OO-Q140 Village of Temecula~nttial Study.rtf
".
'"
4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY, Would the project:
.
Issues and Suppolting lnfonnation Sources Potentially Potentially .....Th.. No
Signilicant Significant Significant '0''''''
."""" UnI8$$ r.ttlgation .......
Inco-ate<!
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
reauirements?
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been oranted\?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner, which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result
in f1oodino on- or offsite?
e. Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the X
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X
g. Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area as X
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
maD?
h. Place within 1 DO-year flood hazard area structures, which X
would imDede or redirect flood flows?
i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X
Comments:
4.a The proposed project would permit development of 160 multi-family residential dwelling units and 71,100
sq. ft. of office/retail space. This type of development does not generally generate any wastewater, other
than domestic or municipal, which will require treatment or waste discharge requirements. No water
quality standards are forecast to be violated by implementing the proposed project. Wastewater will be
delivered to the regional treatment plant for treatment under waste discharge requirements established by
the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. During construction and occupancy
implementation of BMPs as outlined in Supplement A of the Riverside County DAMP will be implemented
which will control pollution to a level of no significance. See mitigation measure 3.b.1.{See Condition Of
Approval, 3.b.1)
4.b The project site is located on a ridge, which has no potential to serve as a recharge location for surface
runoff. Therefore, the project has no potential to adversely interfere with groundwater recharge. The
proposed project does not include any extraction of groundwater, so no adverse direct impact can result
from implementing the proposed project. The GPEIR addresses water demand from development in the
City of T emecula, including 772 acres of medium density residential uses and 520 acres professional
R:\D P\2000\oO.()140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
. .
office uses. Rancho California Water District has confirmed in the "will serve" letter dated May 17, 2000
that water will be available upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assign water
rights. The GPEIR concludes that the City's two purveyors can meet cumulative water demand within the
City without having a significant adverse impact on the environment, including depletion of the areas
groundwater supplies. The proposed development increases the number of dwelling units anticipated in
the General Plan by 37 and increases demand for residential uses. However, the decrease in
commerciaVoffice acreage (5.03) and actual proposed commerciaVoffice square footage (71, tOO square
feet compared to a permissible a range of between t 00,754 and 335,000 square feet under the
applicable Floor Area Ratio (FAR)), and consequent decrease in water demand for commerciaVoffice
uses, decreases water demand more than the additional 37 residences will increase demand. Therefore,
the proposed project will not contribute to a significant cumulative, indirect adverse impact on the area
groundwater aquifers.
4.c The project site presently drains to existing storm drains in Rancho California Road and at the southwest
corner of the project site. From there runoff enters the regional drainage system, which terminates in
Murrieta Creek and ultimately the Santa Margarita River. The existing drainage pattern will be retained
after project development. Erosion and siltation issues are addressed in previous discussions under
geology and hydrology. A preliminary drainage/hydrology study prepared by engineers of Markham
Development Management Group, Inc. verifies that the existing drainage system is adequate to accept
the volume project runoff from the developed site without causing any significant adverse downstream
impacts.
4.d As noted in 4.c above, the project would not alter the existing site or area drainage system. It will
increase runoff as a result of increasing the impervious surface on the project site, but the City imposes
standard conditions to detain surface runoff on the property to ensure that the maximum runoff volume
from the site is not be significantly increased. No adverse impacts are forecast to affect properties
downstream of the site from developing the project as proposed.
4.e Please refer to the discussion under 4.d above.
4.1 Please refer to the discussion under 4.a above.
4.g The project site is located on a ridge and is not located in the vicinity of any identified tOO-year flood
hazard area. No potential for exposure to significant flood hazards will occur from developing the project
site as proposed.
4.h The project site is located on a ridge and is not located in the vicinity of any identified dam inundation
flood hazard area. No potential for exposure to significant flood hazards will occur from developing the
project site as proposed.
4.i-j Since the project is not near any water body and is located on a ridge, no potential exists for the site to be
adversely impacted by inundation from seiche, tsunami, or mudflow.
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
. , .
. ,
5. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially POlantially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant ,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,, Unless Mitigation .""act
IncOroorated
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable x
air aualitv plan?
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially x
to an existina or oroiected air aualitv violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any x
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which
exceed auantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant x
concentrations?
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number x
of oeoole?
Comments:
5.a The land use designations will vary somewhat from that which is contained in the City's General Plan. A
total of 37 additional multifamily residential units are being proposed on the project site than would be
permitted under the existing land use designations. In addition, the amount of commercial development
has been reduced on the project site in order to create a pedestrian scale commerciaVoffice development.
The proposed project modification is of such a small scale and meets the objective of providing adequate
multifamily housing adjacent to a commercial and job generating development that the overall reduction in
trip generation and vehicle miles traveled will be fully consistent with SCAG's Regional Comprehensive
Plan and Guide (RCPG) and the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Development of the
project site with mitigation measures as outlined in the SCAQMD "CEQA Air Quality Handbook" will not
conflict with any applicable air quality plan.
5.b Air quality within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) is improving, and development of the proposed
project will be in full conformance with the RCPG and AQMP because it contains all of the elements
identified in these plants to minimize trip generation and vehicle miles traveled. The proposed project's
development will ensure that the emissions will be minimized to the maximum extent possible and will
contribute to the regional programs being implemented to ensure that air quality emissions in the SoCAB
will ultimately be brought within the carrying capacity of the Basin.
5.c The CEQA Air Quality Handbook contains a screening table for operations and construction impacts.
Under Table 6-2 of the Handbook, the threshold for potential cumulative significant air emissions is 261
apartment units. The comparable threshold for development of office and commercial development is
96,221 square feet and 50,000 square feet respectively. The project proposes 36,000 square feet of
office space and about 35,100 square feet of commercial development, including an -9,600 square foot
day care center. The proposed project falls below these thresholds and therefore, this project does not
have a patential to cause significant air emissions within the basin during operation.
Regarding construction (refer to Table 6-3 in the Handbook), the total area to be graded is approximately
-23 acres, which will occur over a period of one to two months. The threshold for significant grading air
quality impacts is 177 acres quarterly; therefore, the proposed project falls below these thresholds.
Assuming an average of 2,000 square feet for each unit, the total gross floor area (GFA) for the
multifamily project is 320,000 square feet of GFA which is also below the threshold of significance for
apartments (1,410,000 GFA) and the 71,1000 square foot commercial area falls well below the 975,000
GFA in Table 6-3 of the Handbook. Based on these comparisons, the proposed project will not cause or
contribute to cumulative significant increases in air emissions. To prevent nuisance fugitive dust standard
erosion/dust control measures are required as conditions of grading and building permits.
R:\D Pl20001OO.0140 Village of TemeculaUnitial Study.rtf
'"
'.
5.d None of the activities at the project site (multifamily residences or the commercial/office uses) have a
potential to generate significant volumes of pollutants or create substantial pollutant concentrations that
could harm sensitive receptors.
5.e None of the activities at the project site have a potential to generate significant odors or create substantial
odor concentrations that could harm sensitive receptors.
R:\D Pl20001OO.Q140 Village of TemeculaUnitial Study.rtf
'." ."
6. TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Imormation Sources Potentially Poterltially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant ""'""'
''''''''' Unless Mitigation ,,,,,,,ct
Incnmarated
a. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in X
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either
the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio
on roads, or congestion at intersections?
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of X
service standard established by the county congestion
manaaement aaencv for desianated roads or hiahways?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either X
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safetv risks?
d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature X
(e.g., sharp curves ar dangerous intersections) or
incomoatible uses Ie. a., farm eauiomeritl?
e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X
f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X
g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs X
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicvcle racks?
Comments:
6.a A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates (Traffic Impact Analysis Temecula
Village Development) for a project with a total of 454 single family units and a mixed-use retail and
commercial village center on the project site and an adjacent -21 acre parcel to the west. This study was
revised and updated in August 2000. The proposed project consists of 160 apartment units and 71,100
square feet of officefretail use, which fall within the scope of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The
proposed project is an infill development. The TIA concluded the following regarding the area circulation
system impacts: "Under both year 2001 With and Without Project traffic conditions, the intersections of
Rancho California Road at the 1-15 Southbound Ramps, 1-15 Northbound Ramps and Ynez Road are
projected to operate at unacceptable levels of service (i.e., worse than LOS D) during the PM peak
hour..'with roadway improvements planned at these intersections, and with the opening of Overland
Drive overpass...the three intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better, for both the Year
2001 Without Project and With Project traffic conditions. These improvements are now in place.
Consequently, WSA does not propose any specific measures to mitigate project traffic impacts." "The
developer will be responsible for payment of development impact fees in accordance with the fee
schedule established by the City. Prior to project opening, the City may negotiate an agreement with the
developer to implement off-site improvements in exchange for fee credits." Based on the data contained
in the TIA, the proposed project can be implemented without causing any significant adverse impacts to
the circulation system.
6.b Please refer to the discussion in 6.a above.
6.c The project site is not located near any airport and has no potential to adversely impact any air traffic
patterns.
6.d Based on the TlA, the proposed project circulation system improvements will not cause any roadway
hazards.
6.e Emergency access to the project site will be via Rancho California Road on the north and two private
roads, one extending south from Rancho California Road along the west side of the proposed project and
another road entering the shopping center. These two roads will provide adequate emergency access.
R:\O Pl20001OO.Q140 Village of T emeculaUnttial Study.rtf
6.1 The applicant has provided adequate parking spaces to meet the City's Development Code requirements
in both the commerciaVoffice (Sub areas A and B) and multifamily development (Sub area C) areas.
6.g The project will be conditioned to provide alternative transportation facilities consistent with the road
improvements serving the project site and provides a bus bay and seating with shelter designed to be
used as a transit stop No conflict or adverse impact to adopted alternative transportation policies, plans
or programs is forecast to occur from implementing the proposed project.
R:\D Pl20001OO.Q140 Village of TemeculaUnnial Study.rtf
'. .
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Inlormalion Sources PotentiaUy Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant I"""",
,,,,,,,,, Unless Mitigation I""""
Incorporated
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as
a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies. or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or X
regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected X
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological
interruotion, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or imoede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat X
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation olan?
Comments:
7.a The leller from United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service dated May 31,2000,
recommends that focused surveys occur within suitable habitat on site prior to any ground disturbing
activities. According to the Biological Survey, the project site contains a mix of coastal sage scrub (CSS),
ruderaVdisturbed lands and non-native trees. Biological surveys were prepared for the project site. No
sensitive plants and no Quino Checkerspot Butterflies (QCB) were identified on the property, but a pair
California Gnatcatchers (CAGN) were identified. Therefore, based on the current survey, an incidental
take permit will need to be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or FWS). Based on
initial discussions with the Service's Staff, the preference is for offsite mitigation at a 3:1 ratio for CSS and
a 1:1 ratio for the disturbed grassland, with appropriate endowments and protection of resources at the
mitigation site. Therefore, the following mitigation measure will be implemented.
7.a.1 The project developer shall acquire compensatory mitigation acreage off the project site
as outlined above for the -23 acre parcel. Prior to grading the project site, the developer
shall provide the City with a copy of the incidental take permit issued for the proposed
development.
7.b The project site does not contain any waters of the United States, riparian or wetland resources.
Therefore, development of the proposed project cannot adversely impact such resources.
7.c Please refer to the discussion in 7.c above.
R:\O P\2000\OO-ol40 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
.. .
7.d The project site is surrounded by urban/suburban development and as an infill parcel, its development
has no potential to adversely impact wildlife movement.
7.e There are non-native tree species on the site that may require acquisition of a permit for removal. The
developer is required to obtain such a permit and no mitigation is required to ensure that the permit will be
obtained prior to removal of any trees on the property.
7.f Development of the proposed project does not conflict with the provisions of any habitat conservation
plan and, in fact, with the mitigation outlined above should support implementation of such plans.
No additional mitigation will be required for the proposed project.
8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant IrTllaCl
Impact Unles;~:tion ,,,,,act
loco ted
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important X
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
oeneral olan, soecific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
B.a There are no mineral resource designations nor any known mineral resources on this project site Since
the site is located on a ridge, outside of alluvial deposits, no potential for sand and gravel resources exists
on the project site.
B.b Development of the site has no potential to lose access to known and available mineral resources since
none occur on the project site, nor is access required across the site to such resources.
No mitigation is required for the proposed project.
R:\D Pl20001OO-D140 Village of T emeculaUnttial Sludy.rtf
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Inlormation Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Signfficant '''''OCl
,,,,,,,,, Unless Miligation .""""
lnco~ed
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through the routine transportation, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely X
hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of
an existina or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of X
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
or a public airport or public use airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the oroiect area?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X
the project result in a satety hazard for people residing or
workina in the oroiect area?
g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h. Expose peopie or structures to a significant risk or loss, X
injury or death involving wild land fires, including where
wild lands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wild lands?
Comments:
9.a The proposed project will consist of residential, office and retail uses that do not involve significant
potential for routine transport or use of hazardous materials or routine generation of hazardous wastes
beyond those normally encountered in urban/suburban "village center" type setting, typically termed
"household hazardous wastes". The one exception to this finding is the possibility of installing a gasoline
station at the project site. Therefore, a potential does exist for this project to create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment through its implementation. Gasoline service stations are heavily regulated,
regarding both the management of fuel on the site and required operating conditions, which are
established through the County and other regulatory agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality
Management District. To ensure that the implementation of a service station on the project site does not
pose any significant health hazard through the routine transport of hazardous materials for use and for
disposal, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented.
9.a.l Prior to authorization to begin operations by receiving fuel or other hazardous petroleum
materials, fhe developer shall provide fhe City with the following materials: fhe Business
Plan filed with the Department of Environmental Health that outlines how hazardous
products will be safely delivered to the site; managed on the site; and removed from the
site as hazardous waste, if any. This will include all safety measures required to
minimize hazards and public health risks as outlined in the required spill prevention,
response and countermeasures plan. All requirements for managing hazardous
A:\D P\2000\OQ.0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
, .
materials and wastes must conform to local and state public health and safety
requirements established by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Riverside County and the City of Temecula.
9.b Since significant quantities of hazardous material (petroleum products, including gasoline and diesel fuel)
will be used or hazardous wastes generated on the site, a potential exists for significant impacts to the
environment from upset or accidental release conditions. The mitigation outlined under 9.a above will
ensure that any hazards related to upset or accidental release conditions are managed within the level of
safety established by regulatory agencies to ensure such a potential falls below a nonsignificant level of
potential safety hazard. Additional requirements may be necessary at the time a specific development
proposal is reviewed.
9.c Since substantial quanlilies of hazardous materials or wastes will be handled on the project site
(petroleum fuels), there is a potential to emit hazardous emissions in quanlilies that could cause a
significant public health impact. SCAQMD Rules 461-464 establish the controls for operating gasoline
stations, and each station must conduct a public health risk analysis before obtaining operating permits
from the District. Regardless, there is no school within 1/4 mile that would be exposed to such emissions.
These emission control requirements are in place and mandatory, so additional mitigation is not required
to ensure that public health is not adversely impacted. Additional requirements may be necessary at the
time a specific development proposal is reviewed.
9.d The project site is not identified as a contaminated site under Government Code Section 65962.5.
9.e The project site is not near any airport or private airstrip and has no potential to adversely impact airport
operations.
9.f Please refer to the discussion under 9.e above.
9.g Development of the project site has no potential to modify or adversely affect an adopted emergency
response plan or evacuation plan.
9.h The project site does contain a minimal wild land fire hazard onsite based on the presence of the CSS,
but due to the surrounding urban development this fire hazard is not considered significant. The
proposed project will eliminate the wild land fire hazard on the property if it is approved. No adverse wild
land fire hazard impact is forecast to occur and no mitigation is required.
R:\O P\2000\OO.0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
, .
10. NOISE. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Inlormation Sources Potentially Potentially less Than No
Significan1 Significant Significant '''''''''
."""" Unless Mitigation '''''''''
Incoroorat(Kj
a. Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of X
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other aoencies?
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground X
borne vibration or around borne noise levels?
c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
proiect?
d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X
the project expose people residing or working in the
. project area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
10.a According to a summary noise evaluation by Mestre Greve Associates, the project would be exposed to
noise levels of approximately 64.7 Ldn from traffic noise on Rancho California Road. However, the
residential uses included in the proposed project would not be exposed to noise at this level. The
Temecula Village Development design buffers the residential uses from traffic noise on Rancho California
Road with the office/retail development abutting Rancho California Road. The landscape elements
between the office/retail development and the residential component of the project also buffer noise from
Rancho California Road. The future residents of the site will not be exposed to severe noise levels.
(Please also see response 10.c).
10.b Based on the discussion in 10.a above, development of the proposed project will not expose future
residents to excessive ground borne vibration or noise levels.
10.c Future background noise levels will be dominated at the project site by noise generated from traffic on
Rancho California Road, directly north of the project site. The proposed project permits or conditionally
permits the development of use such as a restaurant, small health club, small dance/aerobics/martial arts
studio (less than 5000 sq. ft.), Laundromat, and speCialty retail uses in Sub Area A. These businesses
may operate during evening hours causing nuisance noise to residents in the development and in the
surrounding area. The proposed project also permits or conditionally permits the development of a
fast-food restaurant, health club, dance/aerobics/martial arts studio (greater than 5000 sq. ft.), auditorium,
conference facilities, gas station with car wash, market, movie theater, Laundromat, nightclubfteen club,
veterinary clinic with overnight facilities, and specialty retail uses in Sub Area B. These businesses may
also operate during evening hours, but there is a nuisance ordinance requirement to ensure noise levels
are not excessive.
10.d Construction noise levels will be above background noise levels during daylight hours, but the City
General Plan requires construction noise mitigation by restricting construction activities to daylight hours.
With implementation of this measure the short-term noise impacts are not forecast to be significant to the
surrounding land uses.
R:\O P\2000\OO..o140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
10.e The project site is not located near an airport or a private airstrip and has no potential to be exposed to
significant airport operation noise impacts.
10.1 Please refer to the discussion in 10.e above.
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered Government services in anv of the following areas:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially _ Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant IfTlIact
lnl)aCl Unles:~~gation ,,,,,,,,,
Inco rated
a. . Would the project result in substantial adverse physical X
impacts associates with the provisions of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any of the public
services?
b. Fire protection? X
c. Police protection? X
d. Schools? X
e. Parks? X
f. Other public facilities? X
Comments;
11.a The proposed project is an infill development within the central portion of the City of Temecula and all
services are already available at the project site. The development of 160 apartment units and 71,100 sq.
ft. of office/retail space will place a small increment of cumulative demand on the service systems (fire,
police, schools, and parks). Based on a review of the GPEIR all of the service system impacts from
developing the proposed project can be mitigated to below a significant level by implementing mitigation
measures identified in that document. These measures include: Fire Service, Measures 1 and 2; Police
Service, Measures 1-4, and Education Measures 1-1 and 1-6, as appropriate. For park and recreation
services, those appropriate mitigation measures for the proposed project from Measures 1-3, 1-8 and
1-12 shall be implemented. With implementation of these measures, the proposed project can be
implemented without causing or contributing to a significant cumulative public services impact.
11.b Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above.
11.c Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above.
11.d Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above.
11.e Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above.
11.f Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above.
R:IP Pl20001OO.0140 Village of Temeculallnftial Study.rtf
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
Issues and SUPPOrting In/ormation Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Signilicant Significant l/TlIact
''''''''' Unless Mitigation '''''''''
Incornorated
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X
applicable Reaional Water Quality Control Board?
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or X
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water X
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X
project from existing entitiements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X
provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X
accommodate thej:ll'oiect's solid waste disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X
reQulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
12.a The proposed project will deliver wastewater to the regional treatment wastewater reclamation plant in
Temecula. The Rancho California Water District (RCWD) operates the facility and it has capacity to meet
the demand from the proposed project within its authorized treatment capacity. This facility operates
within its waste discharge requirements. Therefore, the proposed project is not forecast to cause a
violation of wastewater treatment requirements, either directly or indirectly.
12.b According to the GPEIR, adequate capacity exists within the RCWD water supply and wastewater
treatment systems to provide water and wastewater capacity for the proposed project. This conclusion is
aiso supported by urban water master plan adopted by the RCWD.
12.c The site already drains to existing storm drains in the area and a regional storm water system. The
connection of this site will not cause the need to expand these facilities based on detention of storm
runoff. Future volume of flow from the site would not exceed the current maximum flows due to onsite
retention. The drainage analysis for the project site outlines the detailed information regarding existing .
and future storm water runoff.
12.d Adequate water supplies have been identified by the RCWD to meet the City of Temecula's current and
immediate future demands, including the proposed project. See also 12.b above.
12.e Adequate wastewater treatment capacity has been identified by the RCWD to meet the City of
Temecula's current and immediate future demands, including the proposed project. See also 12.b above.
12.1 According to the General Plan and the County Solid Waste Management Plan adequate landfill disposal
capacity exists within the regional landfills to meet current and future demands.
12.g By participating in the City's source reduction and recycling element, the proposed project will comply
with all statutes and regulations for management of solid waste. The proposed commercial and
residential project does not pose any significant or unique management requirements.
R:\D Pl20001OO.0140 Village of TemeculaUnitial Study.rtf
. .
Regarding energy supplies to the project and region, the City of Temecula's General Plan identified
adequate capacity for energy systems. Since this document was adopted electric and natural gas utilities
have been deregulated and short-term shortages in electricity and natural gas will be experienced until
new electrical generation and natural gas production have been installed and are in operation. This
impact is not considered a significant adverse impact at the level of individual urban developments,
because adequate capacity is available but at a higher costs than have occurred in the past, i.e., the
commercial systems are functioning but at a much higher cost than forecasted. The energy availability
issue will cause short-term inconvenience during the higher electricity and natural gas consumption
periods, specifically on the hottest summer days when air conditioning loads are the greatest or during
the winter on cold days.
The City has adopted building codes that require implementation of energy conservation measures for
new development. Implementation of these design and construction standards is considered adequate
compliance with energy conservation goals and policies. The additional energy demands resulting from
the project would normally be considered a less than significant impact. However, as noted above recent
shortages in generation capacity may require the new residents to pay higher costs for electricity or to
accept short-term rolling black outs in response to excessive short-term demand. These limitations will
be resolved as new generating capacity is brought on line over the next few years. This short-term
electricity constraint is not considered to be a significant adverse impact, particularly since the new
structures will be constructed with an awareness of these constraints.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially less Than No
Significanl Significant Significant IlTllact
,,,,,,,01 Unl~~ation '''''''''
Inco ted
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X
b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not X
limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building
within a state scenic hiahwav?
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X
oualitv of the site and its surroundinos?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which X
would adverselv affect day or niahttime views in the area?
Comments:
13.a The proposed project will infill a small undeveloped area along the Rancho California Road urban
corridor. No scenic vistas will be adversely impacted at the project location from developing the proposed
_ project based on the surrounding land uses, which are consistent with that proposed by this project.
13.b No major tree resources, rock outcroppings or historic buildings exist on the project site. The project site
is not located on a scenic highway, but it will be required to meet design requirements along Rancho
California Road to be consistent with existing development. This is a planning and design issue for which
the City has established design guidelines and no adverse environmental impact or mitigation is required
to ensure that the project conforms to local design guidelines.
13.c. The proposed project will be located adjacent to existing single-family units to the east of the project site.
Design requirements will be imposed on the proposed project by application of standards in the Planned
Development Overlay District in addition to the Community Design Element standards and design plan.
- Based on the City's requirement to meet these design guidelines, the proposed project has no potential to
substantially degrade the existing visual character of the site and surroundings, which is comprised of a
combined urban/suburban visual setting.
R:\D P\2000\oo-Q140 Village of Temecula\lnitlal Study.rtf
13.d The proposed project must meet the County's Palomar lighting Ordinance No. 655 requirements for no
conflict with Palomar Observatory. Due to proximity to residential uses, the project will be conditioned to
not create significant light and glare impacts onsite or impacting the surrounding area and uses.
Implementation of this measure will ensure that no light or glare sensitive areas are exposed to significant
light and glare impacts.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources P01entially Potentia/ly less Than No
Significant Significant Significant '''''''''
''''''''' Unless Mitigation '''''''''
Incornorated
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the signfficance of X
a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
an archaeoloaical resource pursuant to Section 1506.5?
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X
resource or site or uniaue aeologic feature?
d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
14.a A cultural resources survey of the project site was conducted by Jean A. Keller and no historical
resources are known to occur on the project site. Therefore, no potential exists for the proposed project
to adversely impact such resources.
14.b The GPEIR sensitivity map for archaeological resources identified the project site as being within a
sensitive area for archaeological resources. Jean A. Keller completed a survey of the site and no
resources were discovered on the property. However, due to the potential for such resources to occur in
the subsurface of the property, the following mitigation measure will be implemented:
14b.1 During initial grading and ground disturbance activities, a qualified cultura/ resources
monitor shall be present and shall have the authority to stop and redirect ground
disturbance activities to evaluate the significance of any cultural resources exposed.
14.b.2 If any cultural resources are exposed during initial grading and ground disturbance
activities the City shall be contacted, and a qualified archaeologist shall evaluafe the
resources. If discovered resources merit long-term consideration, adequate funding
shall be provided to collect, curate and report these resources in accordance with
standard archaeological management requirements.
14.b.3 If any human remains are encountered during initial grading activities, all ground
disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately and
fhe County Coroner's office shall be contacted to manage such remains.
Although the probability is low, any cultural resources discovered during site preparation and grading will
be managed to ensure that all resource value is protected and preserved. With implementation of the
above measures, the potential for significant cultural resource impact has been reduced to a level of no
significance.
14.c The GPEIR sensitivity map for paleontological resources identified the project site as being within a
sensitive area for paleontological resources. Due to the potential for such resources to occur on the
property, the following mitigation measure will be implemented:
R:\D Pl20001OO.Q 140 Village of T emeculaUn~ial Study.rtf
14.c.1
During excavation and hill-side cutting activities, a qualified paleontological monitor
shall be present and shall have the authority to stop and fedirect grading activities to
evaluate the significance of any paleontological resources exposed during the grading
activity within the alignment. If paleontological resources are encountered, adequate
funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report on these resources to the ensure
the values inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and preserved.
14.d Please refer to the discussion in 14.a above.
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
Issues and SUpporting Information Sources Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significanl Significant .""""
,,,,,,,,, UntessMitigation ,,,,,,,,,
Inco.....orated
a. Would the project increase the use of existing X
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require X
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities,
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Comments:
15.a The proposed project includes recreation areas as part of the project including swimming pool, clubhouse
and play areas. Based on the inclusion of these recreational features as part of the proposed project,
existing neighborhood park utilization is not forecast to increase significantly. The residents of the
development are likely to increase demand for regional facilities, such as baseball diamonds, basketbali
courts, etc. However, these are managed facilities where the individual users is typically integrated into
existing leagues and the cumulative demand for such facilities is not forecast to increase substantially
from implementing the proposed project. No significant adverse impact to recreational resources is
forecast to occur from implementing the proposed project.
15.b Please refer to the discussion in 15.a above.
R:\D P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Issues and SUpporting Information Sourc8li Potentially Potentially lass Than No
S1gnifican1 Significant SiliJl'ificant '''''''''
''''''''' Unless Mitigation '''''''''
IncO~ed
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California historv or prehistorv?
b. Does the project have impacts that are individualiy limited, X
but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
oroiects, and the effects of probable future projects?
c. Does the project have environmental effects, which will X
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directlv or indirectly?
Comments:
16.a-c The Temecula Village Development consists of a 160-unit apartment complex and 71,100 sq. ft.
office/retail space that is proposed to be constructed on an infili parcel of land located on the south side of
Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of Rancho California Road and
Cosmic Drive. The proposed project is not consistent with the details of the City of Temecula General
Plan and zoning designations as delineated on current land use and zoning maps. However, it is
consistent with the concept of Village Center and Planned Development Overlay presented in the General
Plan as a method of integrating multiple uses over a large site containing more than one land use or
zoning designation. For the majority (eight of fifteen) of environmental issues discussed in this Initial
Study Environmental Checklist Form (Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Geology and
Soils, Mineral Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Public Services, Utilities and Service
Systems, and Recreation) no potential for significant adverse impact has been identified and no project
specific mitigation, other than standard conditions utilized by the City, will be required.
For the remaining seven issues project specific mitigation will be required to ensure that implementation
of the proposed project does not cause significant adverse physical changes in the environment.
Specifically, mitigation is identified to control erosion and sedimentation on the site for Hydrology and
Water Quality issues. Mitigation is established to prevent nuisance fugitive dust from impacting adjacent
uses during construction. The project site contains coastal sage scrub habitat that was determined to be
occupied by the California Gnatcatcher. Based on discussions with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
this site will not be managed for long-term habitat and offsite compensation is the appropriate mitigation
to reduce this impact to a level of no significance. The project's traffic is identified as having a potential to
adversely impact the local circulation system and a combination of recently completed improvements and
project specific improvements are required to ensure that the circulation system operates at acceptable
levels of service in the future. The site is identified as having a potential for significant paleontological
resources and the possibility of archaeological resources. Mitigation is identified to reduce the potential
impacts to such resources to a no significant level of impact. Mitigation is also provided to reduce the
nuisance noise, from evening/night-time uses on the project site, to a less than significant level. Finally,
mitigation is identified to control potential commercial lighting impacts on adjacent residential property.
Based on the evaluation contained in this Initial Study, the City proposes to adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration as the appropriate environmental determination to comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
A:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program
EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed In an earlier EIR or
negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on
attached sheets.
a. Earlier analvses used. Identifv earlier analvses and state where thev are available for review.
b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed bv mitiaation measures based on the earlier analvsis.
c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are 'Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.' describe
the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to
which thev address site-specific conditions for the proiect.
SOURCES
1. CityofTemecula General Plan, 1993.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 1993.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook
4. 1999 Quino Checkers pot Butterfly Survey 45-Day Letter Report Rancho California Road Project, Merkel &
Associates, Inc., June 10, 1999
5. Kading/Rancho California Road City of Temecula Biological Constraints Report, Merkel & Associates, Inc.
June 4, 1999.
6. Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Temecula VillagefTemecula Ridge Development Temecula, California,
Wilbur Smith Associates, August 28, 2000.
7. Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay, Markham Development Management Group, Inc.,
January 2001.
8. Drainage/Hydrology Study for Tentative Parcel Map No. 29140 Village Commercial and Apartments
9. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) 1997
10. Southern California Association of Governments 'Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide", 1996
11. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment -Temecula Ridge (PA99-0371), Jean A. Keller, 1999
12. Preliminary Noise Analysis for T emecula Ridge, Mestre Greve Associates, February 14, 2000.
13. Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential/Commercial Development City of Temecula, CHJ, Inc.,
June 8, 1999
14. Riverside County Flood Control District "Supplement A to the Riverside County Drainage Area
Management Plans, and Attachment to Supplement A", 1996
15. Rancho California Water District, Steve Brannon, P.E., May 17, 2000
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf
@
Bancha
Water
BoltTciofDire<:ton;
Dou'l'las V. Kulberl{
Pr"~l<i..m
Georl(e:\-L Woods
Sr. \"ice President
Ralph H. Daily
Li~a D. Herman
Csaba F. Ko
Scot! A. :\Iclnt)"re
.Jeffrl'Y L :\llnkler
Offk..rs:
.John F. Henniltar
G..n..rai :\Ianugef
Phillip L Forbes
Dir"(:,'r,,iFinanc...
Tl"E'a~UTl'r
E.P. "Bob" U!moltll
Din>L'l<l1" 'Jf En~neeri~
K.mnl.'lh Co Dealy
Din-n"!"oiOperati"ru;
&.:\la.imenance
Perry R. Louck
C.mtfo:olJ.,r
r
..-:-; ~:
~ i!1:i
May 17, 2000
MAY 1 8 zOOO
'''- -"--.".
'---":"":':':"":::':'-:::':::.:."".::-."=-:..::..
Carole Donahoe, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
LOT NO. 24 OF TRACT NO. 3334
APN 944-290-012, APN 944-290-013 AND
APN 944-290-014
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAOO-0149
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Linda .'II. f'n'l(OSO
Di""" '~,"'"~;Admini",.u,.< Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Sm"""M'""' Agency .Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to
('. :\tkhael Cowell
Best Be"l & Kriegt'r u..P RCWD.
G"n..ral C'Junst'1
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
At-1A-<-'~ ~
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
OO\SB:at066\FOI2- T3\FCF
Hun(.'ho Califurnia WUI,'r District
Ii id' JUN 0 9 2000 ~)/
, :y
United States Department of the Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Ecological SelVices
Carls bad Fish and Wildlife Office
2730 Loker Avenue West
Carlsbad, California 92008
u.&
....... AW1LIlCDZ
SE.''''''
~
Carole Donahoe
Case Planner
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
MAY 3 1 2000
Re: Planning Application PAOO-OI49, City ofTernecula. Riverside COl.mty, California
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
We have reviewed Planning Application PAOO-0149, Village ofTemecula Apartments, Riverside
County, California. We offer the following comments and recommendations on the biological
resources that could be affected by the proposed project based on our knowledge of sensitive and
declining species and habitat types in Riverside County.
Weare concerned about "take" offederally listed species protected under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the take of any federally
listed endangered species by any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Take
includes "harass" and "harm", as defined by section 3 of the Act. Harass in the definition of take
means "an intentional or negligent act or omission which creates the likelihood of injury to
wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns
which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering." Harm in the definition of
take in the Act means "an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include
significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering."
(see 50 CFR S 17.3). Take incidental to an otherwise lawful activity may be authorized under
sections 7 or 10 of the Act.
The proposed project is to construct a l60-unit, two-story apartment complex with clubhouse and
pool. The project site is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, west ofCosrnic
Drive in Riverside County. This area is known to support occupied habitat for the federally
threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila califo1'llica calif arnica, gnatcatcher),
endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quina), and the endangered
Stephens' kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi, SKR). Populations of these species have been
documented in the Rancho California area. If habitat, such as remnant coastal sage scrub, clay
soils, or grasslands, occurs on the proposed project site, then the site may support listed species.
Therefore, we recommend that focused sUlVeys occur within suitable habitat on site prior to any
.. ... j.
('
Carole Donahoe
2
ground disturbing activities. If these wildlife species occupy the project site, incidental take
authorization likely will be required before the proposed project can proceed.
The proposed project occurs within the boundary of the Stephens' kangaroo rat Habitat
Conservation Plan. Compliance with the regional incidental take permit will be required prior to
any ground disturbing activities. Ifwetlands are affected by the proposed project, an U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers section 404 permit and/or California Department ofFish and Game 1600
permit may be required. We recommend that impacts to coastal sage scrub or any other sensitive
resource be considered cumulatively significant and mitigated prior to any ground disturbing
activities.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed project. If you have any
questions or cornments please contact Ruth Olsen of my staff at (760) 431-9440.
Sincerely,
11~~
~ Jim A. Bartel
Assistant Field Supervisor
1-6-00-NFTA-339
cc: Glenn Black (CDFG, Chino)
j .j .fJ
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project Description: Planning Application PAOO-0138 General Plan Amendment
Planning Application PAOO-0139 Zoning Amendment
Planning Application PAOO-0152 Tentative Parcel Map
Planning Application PAOO-0140 Development Plan
Location:
Applicant:
South of Rancho California Road, east of Cosmic Drive and west of
Moraga Road intersection, (APN# 944-290-012, 013, & 014).
The MJW Property Group, Barton L. Buchalter,
7131 Owensmouth Ave, Suite 6-0
Canoga Park, CA 91309-7961
Bioloqical Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Affect endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and
birds).
(1). The project developer shall acquire compensatory mitigation
acreage oft the project site as discussed with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife SeNtce staft whose preference is for oft site mitigation at
3:1 ratio for costal sage scrub and a 1:1 ratio for undisturbed
grassland, with appropriate endowments and protection of
resources at the mitigation site. The developer shall provide the
City with a copy of the incidental take permit issued for the
proposed development prior to grading the project site.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above rnitigation
rneasures as part of the grading plan check review process.
Prior to the issuance of a grading perrnit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Departrnent
Hazards and Hazardous materials
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through routine transportation, use, or disposal or hazardous
materials.
(2). Prior to authorization to begin operations by receiving fuel or
other hazardous petroleum materials, the developer shall provide
the City with the following materials: the Business Plan filed with
the Department of Environmental Health that outlines how
R:\D P\2000\OO..Q140 Village of Temecula\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc
1
, .J. t~
~' ~ .
hazardous products will be safely delivered to the site; managed
on the site; and removed from the site as hazardous waste, if any.
This will include all safety measures required to minimize hazards
and public healfh risks as outlined in the required spill prevention,
response and countermeasures plan. All requirements for
managing hazardous materials and wastes must conform to local
and state public health and safety requirements established by the
State Department of Toxic Substances Control. Riverside County
and the City of Temecula.
Specific Process:
Planning staff will verify cornpliance with the above mitigation
measures prior to the issuance of a building permit for uses
producing hazardous materials (e.g. gas station).
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Riverside County Fire Department, Building and Safety
Departrnent, Public Works Departrnent and Planning Department
Cultural Resources
Generallrnpact:
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5
Mitigation Measures:
(3). During initial grading and ground disturbance activities, a
qualified cultural resources monitor shall be present and shall
have the authority to stop and redirect ground disturbance
activities to evaluate the significance of any cultural resources
exposed.
(4). If any cultural resources are exposed during initial
grading and ground disturbance activities the City shall be
contacted, and a qualified archaeologist shall evaluate the
resources. If discovered resources merit long-term
consideration, adequate funding shall be provided to
collect, curate and report these resources in accordance
with standard archaeological management requirements.
(5). If any human remains are encountered during initial
grading activities, all ground disturbing activities in the
vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately
and the County Coroner's office shall be contacted to
manage such remains.
Specific Process:
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading and building plan check review
process.
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc
2
A ...;.
~~
. " v
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Cultural Resources (cont.)
Generallrnpact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleotological resource or
site or unique geological feature.
(6). During excavation and hill-side cutting activities, a qualified
pa/eontological monitor shall be present and shall have the
authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the
significance of any paleontological resources exposed during the
grading activity within the alignment. If paleontological resources
are encountered, adequate funding shall be provided to collect,
curate and report on these resources to ensure that the values
inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and
preserved.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading plan check review process.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Disturb any hurnan remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries.
(7). If any human remains are encountered during initial grading
activities, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the
discovery shall be terminated immediately and the County
Coroner's office shall be contacted to manage such remains.
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
rneasures as part of the grading and building plan check review
process.
During any ground disturbance and prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
R:\D P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalMitigation Monttoring Program.doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO.2
DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
R:ID P12000l00-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
.~,-
6
RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0138, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REALIGN
THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (M) LAND-USE DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES
OF A 23 ACRE SITE; GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO(S). 944-290-012, 013,014, BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS
AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOllOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, deterrnine and
declare that:
A. MJW Property Group filed Planning Application Nos. PAOO-0138, General
Plan Arnendment, PAOO-0139, Zone Change, PAOO-0140, Development
Plan, and PAOO-0152, Tentative Parcel Map, for the property consisting of
approximately 23 acres generally located south of Rancho California
Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Moraga Road intersection of
Rancho California Road known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 944-290-01 2,
013, AND 014 ("Project").
B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental
review was conducted as required by law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on February 20, 2002 to consider the applications for the
Project and environmental review.
D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the
Planning Comrnission adopted Resolution No. 2002-003 approving a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the
Project, Tentative Parcel Map and Development Plan for the Project and
recornmended that the City Council approve of a General Plan
Amendment and zone change for the Project.
E. On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested
in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on
these rnatters.
F. On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for
R:/Resos 2002lResos 02-_
Section 2.
findings:
A.
B.
C.
the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 02-_ entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE INITIAL
STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
FOR PAOO-0138, PAOO-0139, PAOO-0140 AND PAOO-0152,
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD,
WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012,013, AND 014."
The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following
The Project, including the General Plan Amendrnent, is compatible with
the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Project, including
the General Plan Arnendrnent has been reviewed and deterrnined to be in
conforrnance with the City's General Plan. These docurnents set policies
and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the
community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles.
The Project, including the General Plan Amendment, is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
The Project, including the General Plan Amendment, will not have an
adverse effect on the comrnunity because it remains consistent with the
goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The Project does not
represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site and
represents a relocation of existing land uses.
Section 3. The official "General Plan Land Use Map" of the General Plan of the City
of Ternecula is hereby amended to realign the Professional Office (PO) and Medium Density
Residential (M) land-use designation boundaries of a 23 acre site, generally located south of
Rancho California Road, west of Cosrnic Road and east of the Moraga Road intersection of
Rancho California Road known as Assessors Parcel Nos. 944-290-012, 013, 014 as shown on
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
R /Resos 2002lResos 02. 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 251h day of June, 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Ternecula, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 02-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Ternecula at a regular meeting held on the 25'h day of June, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos 2002lResos 02-_
3
[JJt1fi'S/~, Exhibl't A
~1it~~\I+ ,,\\W~ TIm
J-~~w~~ ~~~,,\~,~~~jfk
T,c-lf; 1f:\\Vi ' eel \ I j "J ), " ~ -
-!\ II I IhT" :\\1'\'1 'if ,_:I )\'-- II I ~-
'07. III T T \~~-~ I\' ",(11),1" \ \~1J<<~
~?::t.J/ I I IT ,ir~r i<\?'XY ,y I \(\\\\' ,\0,Q's2;]" If
7f-111b--l=t, _ ~ Uj 0; ~ _,_ \\1 ~ 11" v q, 'Tv
'I J II I TT ,-' ' v ~ K\:;- ,- \- '- '~Iili
_ _ ? ~ ~~ 'i I ,,{t'iE-y ~
f-- e--- ~ all::-1:./
\ cc=~, ::;// ~rffi0i>
~lI\r ~ ~ cv1 j)i/Ifi ~'/lIl1ljj,
/ _ t:: II n ImM 'mLQi11]
-=-~-::::c=--::! ' c\~ /c~'6r)ff-i
L1 I ~ I-,! fl/irr
\~ - W
:::;~TllT II IT~
~"1 ~, IE '~I~' ~f!! -
1f1~~i~ ~
J-- ..~ Tj~~~' i
-e '- 'c F' ~ II>>
\. J I ,\ \-Nli" Q'tW >>--
'\ , ~~-~'~
-;/f- CC'- iW IT ~ "\;?-~O
~ L- I-D:' 'y \ ,,1 '('
v--J 1=, f- ,e.fc >--J-))-;': , ;{ ILrm-C-'
df ~21 c= - C""ejc< H ~~
@:", 0<~':cI :c-~' ~:
~ ~~~C}f0,~ ~
~,~~~
:::::--
/'
~
/I
ATTACHMENT NO.3
DRAFT ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONE CHANGE AND PDO DOCUMENT
RID P\2000l00-0140 Village ofTemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
7
ORDINANCE NO. 02-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PAOO-
0139 A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
(PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO), AND THE STANDARDS
AND REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING
PDO DOCUMENT, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO(S). 944-290-012, 013,014.
THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOllOWS:
Section 1.
declare that:
E.
F.
R:/Resos 2002lResos 02,_
The City Council of the City of Ternecula does hereby find, determine and
A.
MJW Property Group filed Planning Application Nos. PAOO-0138, General
Plan Amendrnent, PAOO-0139, Zone Change, PAOO-0140, Development
Pian, and PAOO-0152, Tentative Parcel Map, for the property consisting of
approximately 23 acres generally located south of Rancho California
Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Moraga Road intersection of
Rancho California Road known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 944-290-01 2,
013, AND 014 ("Project").
B.
The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental
review was conducted as required by law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
C.
The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on February 20, 2002 to consider the applications for the
Project and environmental review.
D.
Following consideration of the entire record of inforrnation received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-003 approving a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the
Project, Tentative Parcel Map and Developrnent Plan for the Project and
recomrnended that the City Council approve of a General Plan
Arnendrnent and zone change for the Project.
On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested
in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on
these matters.
On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for
Section 2.
findings:
A.
B.
C.
the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 02-_ entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE INITIAL
STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
FOR PAOO-0138, PAOO-0139, PAOO-0140 AND PAOO-0152,
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD,
WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012,013, AND 014."
The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following
The Project, including the zone change and text amendment, is
compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The
Project, including the zone change and text amendment, has been
reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General
Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the
health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are
adequate for emergency vehicles.
The Project, including the zone change and text amendrnent, is
compatible with surrounding land uses.
The Project, including the zone change and text amendment, will not
have an adverse effect on the cornmunity because it remains consistent
with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the Official Zoning Map for the City of
T emecula as follows:
A. For the parcel identified as APN # 944-290-012, change the zoning
designation from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development
Overlay (PDO 5), as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
B. For the parcel identified as APN # 944-290-013, change the zoning
designation from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development
Overlay (PDO 5), as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full..
C. For the parcel identified as 944-290-014, change the zoning designation
from Medium Density Residential (M) to Planned Development Overlay
(PDO 5), as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein
as though set forth in full.
Section 4. The City Council hereby amends Chapter 17.22 of the Temecula
Municipal Code by adding thereto the Villages of Ternecula Planned Development Overlay
District as Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.149, inclusive, of the Temecula Municipal Code, as
R:/Resos 20Q2IResos 02"_
2
said sections are set forth in the document attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Ordinance and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner required by
law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 111h day of July, 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 02-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 25'h day of June, 2002, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 111h
day of July, 2002 by the following VOTE, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos 2002lResos 02-_
3
~
~ ~~ _, ,Exhibit A
~~c~ 71fJ,K I~'" '~~
1'1' )(0 II ~ "= r I J- ::::?X \ ~
'r!JJ ~'}'" / ~ I -l07; \
j"~ ,[\w"(' ,W "1'1' = "
j T I I I ' TI\ ",,~\IY ~C'-::'~n:1\ II/'~
1:", TIT \YO '-n\~Jl: ,)',
T L _, .. -v>rl'5 ~ ~ :r' \--0/< Y IlV
dill Tfy -rl -T \ ,'V/ \- ~;/ ::::. v' ,.~ ~\
::.::::: III '10V'" = ~___~wvl 'Jl BB
e- ~ .. - n ,,,,-,~ ' -
~~ I 'L~~~-----O'
I-' -,--J--- ~ Tf\ S 1/ J::.t h=
\ ,IT 11 Ifj. UlITi'
\ I \ -"" '-I J5jj j::f:f II m:
~ _ \;N~~~ ~J lJIi1i
--==---.J n ,:c - IliIclhry
_________ ilTl -I L [(rrrrrF 1-) L
L LJ~,
\ \ IT ffiTn b- I
\ T' 'f U ~ lI7;=;:
\i It---j ~~ -.:::::::::
'0./ \-l --i
'-1/
"o' T "':S '\ \'
. T 1-t11--L/"V\ Y '\
____ ,_.- 1/ '?if!'> ;, r r;jYOw,y ee
h'>' e\)J ~ P I i \ I ;0,T
ff \Ye:\. '- 11 ~ ,.Yri/~ \ \ \ \ ~
I ~\^~)-; l: ,~ \ TTII \~y
I' 'Y1<.' ,,0) :x / 7"C ,~" ~..-cl--T
;;;/7/'f,iP):'''' w/,ltF! :\ II II
/-01 T:0 t'fl. ~ ~O
~k~\ - v ',r-,;c"J. iX-; I ,-rr:1fN
/--_' Ie'- rem ClJ., .j)(
e:: if-t:SJ., ~-L. II" ~,n \, \
ra~~'~' '= C=" cf'i ^ ~ ~w:'-...r r\\
'F' W ;.c .=,::1 _, ~ c
~ J~- .~ ~~w ->
1 :f<Y-A~ ~. /I
~
\
l-
::-- :--~,
.'.
--l
~
J
-
n
()
)
j
Errata Sheet - Planning Commission Modifications
Planning Application No. PA 00-0139
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay (PDO)
. The Planning Commission made the following recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to Planning Application No. 00-0139 (Planned Development Overlay - PDO)
at their meeting of February 22, 2002:
Table 17.22.1XX (Schedule of Permitted Uses) - 00.7 throuah 14
· Aerobicsldance/gymnastics/martial arts studios (less than 5,000 square feet): delete
"CO from Sub Area A and change "PO to "C' in Sub Area B.
· Animal Hospital (indoor only): delete "Po from Sub Area B.
· Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances): delete "Po from Sub
Areas A and B.
· Automobile parts - sales: delete "Po from Sub Areas A and B.
· Bowling alley: delete "Po from Sub Area B.
· Community care facilities, less than 5,000 square feet: delete "Po from Sub Areas A,
Band C.
· Congregate care housing for the elderly, less than 5,000 square feet: delete "Po from
Sub Areas A, Band C. .
· Fumiture sales: delete "Po from Sub Area B.
· Garden supplies and equipment sales and service: delete "CO from Sub Area B.
· Grocery store, retail & specialty less than 10,000 sq. ft.: change "Po to "C' in Sub
Area B.
· Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.): delete "C' from Sub Area A and
change "Po to "C' in Sub Area B.
· Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing center: delete "research or testing
centers' from Description of Use and add .P'to Sub AreaS.
· Nursing homes/convalescent homes, less than 5,000 sq. ft.: delete .C. from Sub
Areas A, Band C.
· Parcel deliverY services: delete .p. from Sub Areas A and B.
· Public utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission): delete "C' from
Sub Areas A and B.
· Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care): delete .p. from Sub Areas A, B
andC.
· Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales: add "no outdoor storage' to Description
of Use.
· Temporary real estate tract offices: delete "Po from Sub Area A, Band C.
· Wedding chapels: delete "PO from Sub Area B.
1
Section 17.22.1XX. 8.2 (Pedestrian Linkaaes) - 0.17
. The 1st bullet item shall be revised to reaej: "Two (2) pedestrian linkages shall be
provided between Sub Area 8 and Sub Area C. In addition to the pedestrian linkage
depicted on Exhibit 8 (Sidewalk Plan). a pedestrian linkage shall be provided to the
east of the drive lane that connects Sub Area 8 to Sub Area C".
Section 17.22.1XX 8.7.A.1 (Sianaae Proaram) - 0.35
. Delete last bullet Item: "Individual plastic channel letters".
()
(-'
, )
~)
2
Exhibit B
Temecula Village
Planned Development Overlay
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village ofTemecula\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
I
17.22.140
17.22.142
17.22.143
17.22.144
17.22.146
17.22.148
17.22.150
17.22.152
17.22.154
17.22.156
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Chapter 17.22, Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156
Table of Contents
Title
Purpose and Intent
Project Vision
Relationship With Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines
1. Development Standards
2. Design Guidelines
3. Approval Authority
Use Regulations
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Design Standards and Setback Standards
Vehicular Circulation Systern Standards
Architectural and Landscape Design Standards
Incorporation of Exhibits
Exhibit 17.22.156 A. Conceptual Site Plan and Sub Area Map
Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan
Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections
Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Conceptual Building Elevations"
Exhibit 17.22.156 E. Color and Material Board
Exhibit 17.22.156 F through ff Exhibits Attached to Application
Text of new section 17.22.156:
"17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Temecula Village
Planned Development Overlay District shall conform and comply with the
requirernents set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in the
Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference as
though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in the
Zoning Code Text:
Exhibit 17.22.t56 A. Conceptual Site Plan and Sub Area Map
Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan
Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections
Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Conceptual Building Elevations
Exhibit 17.22.156 E. Color and Material Board
Exhibit 17.22.156 F through ff Exhibits Attached to Application"
R:\D P\2000\OO-OI40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POD. PC Changes.doc
2
TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
17.22.140
TITLE.
Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 shall be known as "PDO-5" (Temecula Village
Planned Developrnent Overlay District).
17.22.142
PURPOSE AND INTENT
The Temecula Village Planned Developrnent Overlay District (PDO-5) is intended to
provide regulations for the safe and efficient operation, and creative design of a unique
office/retail and residential area within the City. PDO-5 encompasses 22.97 acres and is
located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of the
intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Way. PDO-5 has been divided into
three distinctive sub areas, as depicted on Exhibit A (Conceptual Site Plan & Sub Area
Map). Sub Area A consists of office/retail property which irnmediately abuts existing
single-family residential to the east. Sub Area B consists of the remainder of the
office/retail area. Sub Area C consists of M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12 dwelling
units/acre) which encompasses the rear portion of the site and abuts existing single-
family residential to the south.
The PDO area is surrounded by existing single-family development to the northeast,
east and south and multi-family development to the northwest. The property to the west
is currently vacant, but zoned M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12 dwelling units/acre).
This special overlay zoning district regulation is intended to permit a range of
neighborhood convenience uses, which are compatible and complimentary to the
existing residential development and M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12 dwelling
units/acre) proposed as part of the PDO. Performance standards, in addition to those
referenced from the City's Development Code and City-wide Design Guidelines, have
been provided to ensure internal project compatibility as well as compatibility with the
adjacent single-family residential development and to protect these adjoining uses from
excessive noise, odor, smoke, toxic materials, and other potentially objectionable
impacts. It is the intent of the City to use these special regulations to supplement the
regulations of land uses and development already existing within the adopted
Development Code. (Ord. 99-03 !}2)
17.22.143
PROJECT VISION
The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO) is intended to
provide a comprehensive planning approach to the development of 22.97 acres. As
discussed above, the project has been divided into three distinctive sub-areas, which
have been created to foster an overall development to serve the needs of existing and
future residents. While it is not feasible to create a pure "Village Center" at this location
because the project is considered "in-fill," the project will include many design features,
which are found in a Village Center. These features include: pedestrian scale of
development, unique signage, gathering places, transit provisions and neighborhood
serving uses. This is accomplished through its design, development standards,
permitted and conditionally permitted uses and guidelines that will be irnplemented at the
Development Plan stage.
R:\D NOOO\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDO . PC Changes.doc
3
Sub Areas A & B comprises the officelretail component of the project. Uses in Sub Area
A have been selected which provide support services to existing and future residents.
These uses are limited in size and scope and are intended to be compatible with the
existing single-family residential to the east. Single story elevations have been included
to help to create a pedestrian scale. Drive-through facilities have been prohibited in Sub
Area A. This area will also provide a place for existing and future residents to work.
Uses in Sub Area B have been chosen that cater to both the pedestrian and the
automobile. Existing and future residents, as well as passing motorists will be able to
utilize potential services provided in this area. Some auto-oriented uses are permitted in
Sub Area B. This is a necessary component to the project, as it will serve to internalize
vehicle trips and reduce vehicle trips to auto-oriented services along Rancho California
Road.
Sub Area C is the residential component of the PDO. A total of one hundred sixty (160)
units may be developed in this area. As depicted on Exhibit A, multi-family residential
development is envisioned in this Sub Area, although other residential and limited non-
residential uses are also envisioned in this Sub Area (reference Section 17.22.146, Use
Regulations). Large landscaped buffer areas have been provided between this Sub
Area and the existing single-family development to the east and south.
Several obstacles to pedestrian access exist within the Sub Areas, as well as to the
existing single-farnily residential to the east and south, the existing multi-family
residential to the north (across Rancho California Road) and to planned multi-family
residential development to the west. A comprehensive sidewalk plan, which has been
coordinated with the landscape plan, is included as Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). This plan
will foster pedestrian access within the site. When coupled with the existing/proposed
pedestrian network, obstacles to pedestrian movement will be greatly reduced.
17.22.144
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE
DESIGN GUIDELINES
A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District is contained in Table
17.22.148.
B. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.03.050, the following rules
and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area.
1. Development Standards.
a. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.08)
that would apply to any development within a Neighborhood Commercial
zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed
complete for Sub Area A.
b. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.08)
that would apply to any development within a Community Comrnercial
zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed
complete for Sub Area B.
R:\D P\2000\OO-014O Village ofTemecula\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
4
c. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.06)
that would apply to any development within a Medium Density Residential
zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed
complete for Sub Area C. This includes site open space and private open
space requirements, as well as overall project density.
d. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the
Development Code will apply to Sub Areas A, B & C.
e. Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements per Chapter 17.32 of the
Development Code will apply to Sub Areas A, B, and C.
2. Design Guidelines. The City-Wide Design Guidelines that are in effect at
the time an application is deemed complete.
a. Chapter 3 (General Commercial Design Guidelines) and Chapter 4
(Specific Commercial Development Type Design Guidelines) for Sub
Area A and Sub Area B.
b. Chapter 5 (Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines) for Sub Area C.
3. Approval Authority. The Conceptual Site Plan is depicted in Exhibit A.
Approximate building square footage and location, as well as approximate
location of parking, drive lanes, access points and landscaping, are shown on
this Exhibit. Conformance with Exhibit A, as well as the provisions contained
below will allow the Approval Authority for projects approved under PDO-5 as
follows:
a. Permitted uses, which are within Sub Area A and Sub Area B of PDO-5,
and are consistent with the provisions contained within PDO-5, shall be a
staff level approval and shall not require a noticed public hearing. Those
permitted uses found to not be consistent with the above shall be heard
by the Planning Director at a noticed public hearing.
b. Conditionally Permitted uses, which are within Sub Area A and Sub Area
B of PDO-5, and are consistent with the provisions contained within PDO-
5, shall be approved by the Planning Director and will require a noticed
public hearing.
c. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are
in effect at the tirne an application is deemed complete for Permitted and
Conditionally Permitted Uses within Sub Area C.
4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an
application is deemed complete. (Ord. 99-03 9 2)
R:\D P\2000\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\TemecuIa Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
5
17.22.146
USE REGULATIONS
The list of permitted land uses for the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay
district is contained in Table 17.22.148. Where indicated with a letter "P" the use shall
be a permitted use. A letter "COO indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject
to the approval of a conditional use permit. Where indicated with a "-", the use is
prohibited within the zone.
R:\D P\2000\00..()I40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ. PC Changes.doc
6
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use A I B I c
A
Adult business - - -
Aerobicsldance/gymnasticsljazzercise/martial arts studios (less C PC
than 5,000 sq. ft.)' -
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/rnartial arts studios (greater - p
than 5,000 sq. ft.)' -
Airports - - -
Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities - - -
Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) - - -
Alcoholic beverage sales'- - C -
Ambulance services - - -
Anirnal hospital (indoor only) - P -
Antique restoration - C -
Antique sales . p p -
Apparel and accessory shops p P -
Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P P -
Arcades (pinball and video games) - - -
Art supply stores p p -
Auction houses - - -
Auditoriums and conference facilities - C -
Automobile dealers (new and used) - - -
Automobile sales (brokerage)-showroom only (new and used)-no - -
outdoor display -
Automobile Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs - - -
Automobile painting and body shop - - -
Automobile repair services - - -
Automobile rental - C -
Automobile salvage yardslirnpound yards - - -
Automobile service stations - p -
Automotive parts -sales P P -
Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine - with or - -
without an automated car wash 1 -
B
Bakery goods distribution - - I -
R:\D P\2000\00-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Qumges.doc
7
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use A B C
Bakery retail - p -
Bakery wholesale - - -
Banks and financial institutions, without drive-through p p -
Banks and financial institutions, with drive-through - p -
Barber and beauty shops p P -
Bed and breakfast - C -
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) p p -
Billiard parlor/pool hall - - -
Binding of books and similar publications - - -
Blood bank p p -
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services - p -
Bookstores p p -
Bowling alley - p. -
Building material sales - - -
Butcher shop - p -
C
Cabinet shop - - -
Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) P P -
Candy/confectionery sales P P -
Car wash, full service - - -
Carpet and rug cleaning - - -
Catering services - P -
Clothing sales P P -
Coins, purchase and sales P P -
Cold storage facilities - - -
Comrnunications and microwave installations - - C
Communications equipment sales - C -
Comrnunity care facilities, less than 5,000 square feet> P. P. P.
Computer sales and service P P -
ConfJregate care housing for the elderly, less than 5,000 square P. P. P.
feee
Construction equiprnent sales, service or rental - - -
Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental - - -
Construction trailer P P P
R\D P\2000\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Changes.doc
8
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use A B C
Convalescent facilities, less than 5,000 square feet> - C P
Convenience market' - - -
Costume rentals p p -
Crematoriums - - -
Cutlery sales - p -
D
Data processing equiprnent and systems C C -
Day care centers - C C
Delicatessen C p -
Discount/department store - - -
Distribution facility - - -
Drug store/pharmacy p p -
Dry cleaners, no drive through p p -
Dry cleaning plant - - -
E
Emergency shelters - - -
Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) - p -
Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage) - - -
F
Family day care homes (small and large) - - p
Feed and grain sales - - -
Financial, insurance, real estate offices p p -
Fire and police stations - - -
Floor covering sales - p -
Florist shop p P -
Food processing - - -
Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity - - -
Freight terrninals - - -
Fuel storage and distribution - - -
Funeral parlors, mortuary - - -
Furniture sales - p -
Furniture transfer and storage - - -
R:\D P\2000\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Olanges.doc
9
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use A I B I c
G
Garden supplies and equiprnent sales and service - e -
Gas distribution, meter and control station - - -
General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft.* C P -
Glass and mirrors, retail sales - p -
Governmental offices, less than 5,000 sq. ft.* C p -
Granny Flat - - p
Grocery store, retail & specialty less than 10,000 sq. ft. - PC -
Grocery store, wholesale - - -
Guest House - - p
Guns and firearm sales - - -
H
Hardware stores, less than 2,000 square feet' P P -
Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.)' e PC -
Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.)' - P -
Health food store C P -
Health care facility, less than 5,000 square feet' P P C
Heliports - - -
Hobby supply shop P P -
Home and business maintenance service - - -
Hospitals - - -
Hotels/motels - - -
I
Ice cream parlor P P -
Impound yard - - -
Interior decorating service P P -
J
Junk or salvage yard - - I -
K
Kennel - - I -
R:\D P\2000\00-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PD~ - PC Changes.doc
10
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use A B C
L
Laboratories, film, medical, research er testiRg ceRters - p -
Laundromat p p -
Laundry service (commercial) - - -
Libraries, museums and galleries (private) C p -
Liquefied petroleurn, sales and distribution - - -
Liquor stores and wine shops 1 - C -
Lithographic service - - -
Locksmith p p -
M
Machine shop - - -
Machinery storage yard - - -
Mail order businesses p p -
Manufactured homes - - p
Manufacturing of products sirnilar to, but not limited to, the
Following:
Custorn-made product, processing, assembling, - - -
packaging, and fabrication of goods within enclosed
building (no outside storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art
objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing,
assembling, and repair processes which do not involve
frequent truck traffic.
Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, - - -
packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and
products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer
of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and
warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling,
shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and
wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or
semi refined products requiring further processing or
manufacturing, and outside storage.
Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage - - -
Massage - - -
Medical equipment sales/rental p p -
Membership clubs, organizations, lodges - - -
R:\D P\2000\00-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POD. PC Changes.doc
11
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use A B C
Mini-storage or mini-warehouse - - -
Mobile home sales and service - - -
Motion picture studio - - -
Motorcycle sales and service - - -
Movie theaters - C -
Musical and recording studio - C -
N
Nightclubs/tavems/bars/dance club/teen club' - C -
Nurseries (retail) - C -
Nursing hornes/convalescent homes, less than 5,000 square feet' G G G
0
Office equipment/supplies, sales/services C P -
Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than - C
50,000 sq. It: -
Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. It.,
including, but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, P P -
veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate,
insurance'
P
Paint and wallpaper stores - P -
Parcel delivery services p p -
Parking lots and parking structures, appurtenant to the primary C C
-
use
Pawnshop - P -
P~rsonal service shops P P -
Pest control services - - -
Pet grooming/pet shop P P -
Photographic studio P P -
Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) - - -
Postal distribution - - -
Postal services P P -
Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.) - C -
Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities G G
Comrnission) -
R:\D NOOO\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Changes.doc
12
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I A B I c
Q
Reserved - - -
R
Radio and broadcasting studios, offices P P -
Radio/television transmitter - - -
Recreational vehicle parks - - -
Recreational vehicle sales - - -
Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed - -
building -
.
Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard - - -
Recycling collection facilities - p -
Recycling processing facilities - - -
Religious institution, without a day care or private school C C C
Religious institution, with a private school C C -
Religious institution, with a day care C C -
Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial C C
or industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business) -
Residential, multiple-family housing - - P
Residential, single-family detached - - p
Residential, duplex - - P
Residential, single-family attached (greater than two units) - - P
Residential care facilities for the elderly C C P
Restaurant, drive-in/fast food - C -
Restaurants and other eating establishments C P -
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment' - C -
Retail support use (15 percent of total development square - -
footage in BP and L1) -
Rooming and boarding houses - C p
S
Scale, public - - -
Schools, business and professional C C -
Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12) C C -
Scientific research and development offices and laboratories - - -
Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care) < p p p
R:\O P\2000\OO-014O Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
13
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use A B C
Solid waste disposal facility - - -
Sports and recreational facilities - - -
Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building - - -
Swap Meet, outdoor - - -
Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales - p -
T
Tailor shop p p -
Taxi or limousine service - - -
Temporary real estate tract offices P P P
Tile sales - p -
Tobacco shop - C -
Tool and die casting - - -
Transfer, moving and storage - - -
Transportation terminals and stations - - -
Truck rentals (no sales or /service) - - -
TVNCR repair P P -
U
Upholstery shop I - I - -
V
Vending machine sales and service - - -
Veterinarian clinic w/overnight facilities (indoor kennels) - P -
W
Warehousing/distribution - - -
Watch repair P P -
Wedding chapels - P -
Welding shop - - -
Welding supply and service (enclosed) - - -
y
Reserved - - -
R:\D P\2OOO\OO-Ot 40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ . PC Changes.doc
14
Table 17.22.148
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I A T B I c
Z
Reserved I - I - I -
1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.0B.050(G) of the Development Code, special
standards for the sale of alcoholic beverages.
2. All Senior Project housing residential projects shall use the development and
performance standards for the M (Medium Density Residential) zone and the provisions
contained in Section 17.06.050.H of the Ternecula Development Code.
. The Director of Planning may approve an increase in floor area up to 15% for those uses
that have a maximurn square footage specified.
(Ord. 99-039 2)
17.22.150
DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS
The following standards are designed to increase the compatibility between uses within
and adjacent to the project. The standards are to be irnplemented based upon the
appropriate Sub Area.
A. Sub Area A
1. Landscape Setback/Buffer.
. A landscaped buffer area, not less than twenty-five feet (25') in width
shall be provided between Sub Area A, and the existing residential
development to the east. Reference Exhibits C-3a (Plan) and C-3b
(Section).
. The landscaping shall include (at a minimum) specimen trees, shrubs,
and appropriate ground cover. No parking areas are allowed in this
visual buffer area. A wall shall be provided on the eastern property
line between Sub Area A, and the existing residential development to
the east. The height of the wall shall be six feet and may be
increased to eight feet if deemed necessary and appropriate by the
Community Development Director.
. A minimurn twenty-five foot (25') landscape setback from the property
line shall be provided along the Rancho California Road frontage. No
parking or drive lanes may be allowed to encroach into this area.
Reference Exhibits C-2a (Plan) and C-2b (Section).
R:\D P\2000\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Changes.doc
IS
2. Pedestrian Linkaaes.
· Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B
(Sidewalk Plan).
. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided between Sub Area B, Sub Area
A and Rancho California Road. Pedestrian access between Sub Area
C and Sub Area A will be via Sub Area B. A pedestrian linkage
shall be provided to the east of the drive lane that connects Sub
Area B to Sub Area C.
3. Buildina Heiaht. All buildings in Sub Area A shall be one-story. Varied
roof heights shall not exceed twenty-eight feet (28') in height. Towers
and other architectural features shall not exceed thirty-nine feet (39') in
height.
4. Gatherina Soaces. A minimum of one (1) pedestrian gathering space
shall be provided in Sub Area A. Gathering spaces shall contain the
following items:
. Shading. (I.e., urnbrellas, shade structures).
. Plantings (i.e., a mixture of trees, shrubs, vines). These may be
within planter areas or potted.
. Seating. (i.e., chairs, benches, seat walls).
. Eating area.
5. Transit Provisions. Provisions for a transit stop shall be provided in either
Sub Area A or B. Final location shall be determined at the Development
Plan stage, through consultation with the developer, Riverside Transit
Agency (RT A) and the City Traffic Engineer.
6. Loadina Areas. All required loading spaces shall be located in the front of
the building. No loading shall be allowed on the side or the rear of the
buildings.
7. Trash enclosures. No trash enclosures shall be permitted on the rear
sides of the buildings or along Rancho California Road. All enclosures
shall be architecturally compatible with the main building and screened
with landscaping. Exact locations shall be determined at the
Development Plan stage.
B. Sub Area B.
1. Landscaoe Setback. A rninirnurn twenty-five foot (25') landscape setback
from the property line shall be provided along the Rancho California Road
frontage. No parking or drive lanes may be allowed to encroach into this
area. Reference Exhibits C-1a (Plan) and C-1b (Section).
2. Pedestrian Linkaaes. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance
with Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan).
R:\D P\20oo\oo-014O Village of Temecula\TemecuIa Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
16
. /\ minimum sf eRe (1) Two (2) pedestrian linkages shall be provided
between Sub Area B and Sub Area C. In addition to the pedestrian
linkage depicted on Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan), a pedestrian linkage
shall be provided to the east of the drive lane that connects Sub
Area B to Sub Area C.
. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided between Sub Area B, Sub Area A
and Rancho California Road.
3. Transit Provisions. Provisions for a transit stop shall be provided in either
Sub Area A or B. Final location shall be determined at the Oeveloprnent Plan
stage, through consultation with the developer, Riverside Transit Agency
(RTA) and the City Traffic Engineer.
4. Gatherino Soaces. A minimum of one (1) pedestrian gathering space shall
be provided in Sub Area B. Gathering spaces shall contain the following
items:
. Shading. (i.e., umbrellas, shade structures).
. Plantings (i.e., a mixture of trees, shrubs, vines). These may be within
planter areas or potted.
. Seating. (i.e., chairs, benches, seat walls).
. Eating area.
5. Loadino Areas. All required loading spaces shall be located in the front of the
building. No loading shall be allowed on the side or the rear of the buildings.
6. Trash enclosures. No trash enclosures shall be permitted on the rear sides
of the buildings or along Rancho California Road. All enclosures shall be
architecturally compatible with the main building and screened with
landscaping. Exact locations shall be determined at the Oeveloprnent Plan
stage.
C. Sub Area C.
1. Buildino Setbacks. All structures shall be setback a minimum of forty-five
(45) feet along the eastern and southerly property line, which abuts
existing single-family residential development. Reference Exhibits C-6a
(Plan) and C-6b (Section).
2. Pedestrian Linkaoes. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance
with Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan).
. A minimum of one (1) pedestrian linkage shall be provided between
Sub Area C and Sub Area B and between Sub Area B or Sub Area C
and Sub Area A.
. A pedestrian pathway system shall be provided within Sub Area C.
3. Buildino Heioht. The height of structures shall not exceed two (2) stories
or thirty-five (35) feet in height.
R:\D P\2000\OCJ-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO. PC Qumges.doc
17
4. Buildina Plottina. Buildings on the eastern property line shall be plotted
so that they will not view into the existing residences to the east of the
project. The ends of units or garages shall be located on the perimeter.
R:\D NOOO\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Changes.doc
18
17.22.152
VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SYSTEM STANDARDS
Vehicular Circulation System Standards have been developed to assure that adequate
vehicular access ingress and egress exist for the project, that internal project circulation
and vehicle stacking are sufficient and that necessary emergency vehicle access
requirements are met. A Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit A) has been prepared with input
from the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments. Locations and approximate
square footage for building envelopes, access points from Rancho California Road and
the western road, drive lanes, parking lots and parking lot landscaping have been
provided on the conceptual plan in an effort to depict typical overall development of the
site. Minor changes or rnodifications to the conceptual plan may occur provided they are
reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula at the developrnent plan stage.
Access Points: Three (3) access points to the project have been provided to the site
from Rancho California Road.
1. Access to Sub Area A shall be provided from the easterly access point on
Rancho California Road and by a drive lane, which is perpendicular to
Rancho California Road (through Sub Area B).
2. Access to Sub Area B shall be provided from all three (3) access points on
Rancho California Road.
3. Access to Sub Area C shall be provided frorn the two westerly access points
on Rancho California Road and from the property to the west via the westerly
Rancho California Road project access point.
17 .22.154
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Architectural and Landscape Design Guidelines have been included for the commercial
component of PDQ-5 (Sub Area A and Sub Area B). These guidelines, when used in
conjunction with the Citywide Design Guidelines, will provide the necessary assurances
that a cornprehensive and high quality project is developed on the site. Unless
expressly stated below, Residential Architectural Guidelines for Sub Area Care
contained within Chapter 5 of the City-Wide Design Guidelines.
A. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. Form, Height And Massing
A variety of building form, height and massing techniques shall be utilized to
achieve a pedestrian scale of development. The Guidelines contained below
correspond to the Conceptual Building Elevations (Elevations), contained in
Exhibit D. The Elevations are representative of the design concept that is
strongly encouraged in the commercial component of Temecula Village. Final
design of the individual buildings will utilize the design concepts depicted on the
Elevations and may vary from the Elevations depicted in Exhibit D.
. The architectural design of the office and retail area in Sub Area A shall be
single-story structures with covered walkways, colonnades, arcades and
R:\D P\2000\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ ~ PC Changes.doc
19
openings that create interest. Structures in Sub Area B may be increased to two-
stories; however, they must meet the criteria mentioned above.
· Two-story buildings shall not exceed thirty-four feet (34') in height. Exceptions to
this height limitation, up to forty feet (40') in height, shall be allowed for towers
and other architectural features.
. Offsets in planes shall be used to reduce the mass of building walls, accent entry
areas, and create architectural interest.
. Building forms shall be of simple geometry with sculptural or traditional forms
acceptable.
. Second floor balconies/dormers is a method that can be used to reduce the mass
of large buildings.
. Pediment entries, colorful window and door trim shall be used for accent
purposes.
. Building entries shall be defined and articulated through the use of items such as
colurnns and stone veneers.
. Recessed windows and entryways shall be used, especially at the ground level
as they add interest to the product.
. Windows or window-type elements are encouraged on second story elernents.
. Windows on the second floor should line up with windows on the first floor,
making the column/structure apparent.
. All sides of the buildings shall receive adequate detail treatment; however,
reduced articulation shall be permitted for those sides of the buildings that are
not clearly visible from public view.
. The use of arcades is encouraged on front elevations of larger buildings (Shops
"B" and Building UP') and on the western elevations of the buildings in Sub Area
A (Buildings "G", "H" and "I").
2. Colors & Materials
The colors and materials for all Sub Areas shall be consistent with the color and
material board (Exhibit E). The purpose of the color and material board is to
provide continuity between the components of the Temecula Village POO.
A. Colors
. The predominant building color includes a mixture of earth tones (grays,
whites, yellows, tans and browns, similar to colors already used throughout
the City of Temecula and other Southern California cities. Warrn or light
colors are the most appropriate for trirn.
. Brighter colors shall be limited to signs, doors, window trirn and other
detailing related to pedestrian areas.
B. Materials
. Cernent Plaster, or similar rnaterials will be used predominantly throughout as
will natural color ledger stone, wood trellis and copper patina metal roofing.
. The use of canvas awnings is strongly encouraged over windows and entries.
. Textured concrete (poured in place or tilt up) and concrete block may be used
on building elevations.
R:\D NOOO\OO.OI40 Village of Temecula\TemecuIa Village PD~ - PC Changes.doc
20
. High quality, dark colored roofing, such as sealed non-reflective metal, wood
or concrete shingles or shakes, and asphalt/concrete composites are
recommended.
. Beams, posts and wooden or stone columns should be simple with camps
and toes. Care should be taken so that the width of the column is in
proportion to the scale of the building.
3. Roof Forms
. Flat roofs with simple horizontal or gabled parapets are encouraged. Roofs shall
be high enough to hide rooftop equipment.
. Rooftops shall be designed to be visually attractive when viewed from adjacent
buildings or roadways.
. Varied roof heights shall be incorporated to reduce building massing.
. The use of cornices is strongly encouraged.
B. LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. Project-Wide Landscaping
Plant communities currently represented on the site are annual grasslands and
woodland tree plantings. Existing development in the area also establishes a
plant palette for the project to draw from. The landscape theme for the site
development is intended to cornplirnent the existing development, while at the
same tirne establishing it own identity.
The landscape theme is also intended to support the architectural guidelines by
creating screens and buffers where needed and views where opportunities exist.
Guidelines:
. Plant material selection for street trees shall be determined by the Chapter 8
(Public Design Guidelines) of the City-Wide Design Guidelines and
complement the existing street trees on Rancho California Road.
. Introduced plant rnaterials will be installed so that they reflect the surrounding
plant species.
. Irrigation systems shall include low flow drip systems, consistent with the
Section 17.32 of the City's Development Code (Water-Efficient Landscape
Design).
. Landform grading and the use of berming shall be used in coordination with
development pad landscaping to screen parking and loading areas.
2. Project Edges
Project edges will be the rnost visible cornponents of the project. These edges
include: Rancho California Road edge, residential (internal)/office/retail (internal)
edge, residential (internal)/residential (external) edge and residential
(internal)/residential (external) edge. The intent is to provide a comprehensive
landscape approach to the project, while paying attention to the particular needs
of each edge condition. Plans and Sections are provided to guide future
R:\D P\2000\OO-OI40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ . PC Changes.doc
21
Development Plans in these areas. The Landscape Plan and Section Legend,
Plans and Sections are included as Exhibit C and Exhibits C-1a through C-7b.
a. Rancho California Road Edae
Landscaping along Rancho California Road will be complimentary to existing
landscaping along Rancho California Road, as well as serve to identify the
project. Streetscape plantings will be coordinated with interior streetscape and
parking treatments as well as with adjacent parcel landscaping. Enhanced
project entries at two locations will provide a gateway into the project. Reference
Exhibits C-1a (Plan) and C-1b (Section): Rancho California Road/Sub Area B
Interface and Exhibits C-2a (Plan) and C-2b (Section): Rancho California
Road/Sub Area A Interface.
b. Residential (External)/Office/Retail Edae
This edge will serve to buffer the proposed development in Sub Area A from the
existing single-family residential to the east. A minimum twenty (20) foot
landscape buffer shall be required frorn the eastern property line to any structure.
An architecturally treated wall shall be constructed on the eastern property line to
further serve as a buffer. Evergreen trees with broad canopies may be utilized to
allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. Reference
Exhibits C-3a (Plan) and C-3b (Section): Sub Area A Interface at East.
c. Residential (Internal)/Office/Retail (Internal) Edae
This edge will be viewed by residents living adjacent to the project and will act as
a buffer between the development and residential use. Native vegetation in good
condition will be retained where possible and layered densely planted evergreen
landscape rnaterials will be provided for further screening. Reference Exhibits C-
4a (Plan) and C-4b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area B Interface and Exhibits C-
5a (Plan) and C-5b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area A Interface.
d. Residential (lnternal)/Residential (External) Edae
Slopes created on the eastern and southern slopes will be extensively
landscaped to meet current City Development Code standards. Since these are
down slopes of various lengths, trees and shrubs are provided near the top of the
slope to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. The
southwestern portion of the site will not be altered and will remain in a natural
state. Reference Exhibits C-6a (Plan) and C-6b (Section): Sub Area C Interface
at East and Exhibits C-7a (Plan) and C-7b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at
South.
3. Major Entries
Special landscaping will occur at the major entries that will identify the points of
entry and set the tone for the center. Plantings will be coordinated with the
Rancho California Road edge. Clear views for traffic safety and project signage
must be maintained. Enhanced vehicular and pedestrian access will identify
major entries, as follows.
R:\O P\2000\OO-OI40 Village of Temecu1a\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
22
"17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Temecula Village
Planned Developrnent Overlay District shall conform and comply with the
requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in the
Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference as
though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in the
Zoning Code Text:
Exhibit 17.22.156 A. Conceptual Site Plan and Sub Area Map
Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan
Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections
Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Conceptual Building Elevations
Exhibit 17.22.156 E. Color and Material Board
Exhibit 17.22.156 F through ff Exhibits Attached to Application"
R:\D P\2000\OO+Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Changes.doc
23
~: Ii :;:.;;:;:;;;;;;:;;: C.d ;
...J ~~~~ m!iH HHIHm ~I ; I!I~I!I~II!-; !~[~~ ~~ 0 ! i
i mii~m!!!!! im . . .... · _ ~..
I~ ~ h J~ -,-- ~
. ~ I IHii ~tlll'l lih ! ~Ii i Iii ~ ~
, i h"', !!mml::Ulhihl:1I ilmlllmm InUiii r i I !! i 'I W
:jpl", ! \"', . I I I Ii 11I1 9;. ~ C/) J
,1 11\ .1, : .' : ~-i ", ' '\, . ",'" f ' :-- - n ,/' " ! .'
'.; i1'\ :\', n i' . '" : ,', v',". ",,:J,' Z _' " .' '\ :', 1.R .1zjfJ9"l, '''' 9 :' )<"::,"': "..:;<>>// >/::,:" - "3'
; : '\! tl, I, ". "., i Z ~ ~ I 8 --c ~ ,~'j. '-';: \"0'_' ' , . "'0 "'" ",;;MB 134)97"99 ~." ...? "" "': '-7:::::::-:~-:/ ,., /I""'R 12169
ii' 11 . '..., 'l "', '. ,cvJ- ,/'lBLlIi'! __ '_""_ - -""V~';"'"c_".. ....~.: _._,~..' "'Tilll-- ~:- ~"/, ~"'''' .-.__.c"__'J.?!;,, /91"91
:':.\\ il! : ;!'. .<'~. j,-"._.d.~.'T'-~,:~-'..o...L:;g~~:> !:IL---..--::::""c:::::,:::::::\",Jf.:' ..:.....",'~o-';.fM.~."BE.~Pli(',"7:;.;y::c.q;:-;;::;> -~;"-:;::;"-;=-;:>'" N1El13i1",
. '. ,. t~ ' . ",. .... ..' . Jlt -'- ".1 -,', --. ~ '.'". )'EI)' 'f?' r" , l'''cf r"'/'" -- "..".. .. ,-,-.
! .f i'IM . :;~., ;;;i I > ". ,', "','... ' '~'.: .. ,.,,) I" "'.~' ",,' . ., ". . -. .' . .... '
il;'L(t~;:)8,.t' ~<t"~1!. "'.' ~;'f1!.'> ~'. I! '~: ," . '. ~~~~:;:~~~~,: - I,' "
:i\}::.-.:::.l':li-\,'U.~L~'i.;:"" ,~;il,..-....~,I" 'Ill ~UJ'~.~ .111.111: I~:~.I III i 10" .l'h!! It:~~:t . \\:H~- '. .' - )--- :\ ~-,,~~
.! I' , '-0::... ~\~; _+1' .:F I<'<!?!\'. . .f - '"
i~~il ;,';}, . ".; r:i<(~J-tt{r~llll,j!. i=HI\'_~ ~ '....:.... 'f:;"U;1
!!;':'I"!!'! ' .(!~: .- I: II"!.I ~ E <,..-~-(~~\~~v . ~" ".'~.!.:.,.'..l.r,,:..~.,.,-..,.......,.i.:.._._~:,=~::_:""'{'::"""""':~r";:"'-':'
i~j'F,i: i,,:,_III-~cnt ,~,;'~:,~)-::i:I;':'~'J'~. JI;f_"~\\@~, I~~~";
, :. I' :! i,' >:-'--.---.l~ ,.......-.,'J.... '''':fr~ \~ ::;. , .~ ..\~:l;~~' ..;"
r,.,.:.: \.,.,,11'; I'. .... ~, . . ......~~. '1111" j I~n "I"~" '. . ". " ~:~,...~ I ~#;fl , :.:'. ,,'.i/'.
i:'-ii' lj;.:1.~i.,:I-.--I-~1-~.TI!"!_I1J_L~~=; . +':'r':~':~~)~, ,.if:l(Q\j~:ijl\.'S~.~~,,~:":~"
i:,.'I....I!' .:T ff" ~ I" ji'''T'''' "'I""'HT.i.' 11'1. j I~.i . HJ-.': ,- . . "r.... -'>" ,;\.' ,'..','
:;.J"lli1l:' I,lL ~~. I. I r.:;l", /: :_"\:;.. ~'~ - --,'~
!,t~".I!iUl. '.' !-I::.'.'..... s f---. -.-.- ~ I TII' T I ..r . . } i . ~ .' ...3\11- i/ .~.,' ..... _ 11.1 :" : :::,"'. ;i- ~."'"
",,,...S "',,, HI::~ I JH' '~rff' r--.--.--L--.~.-.J . "':!I- J-&j" '1\~1" . ,U
i.J;,,~j : [:!/.~ -'-, r,,,, ... I' '::ll ~ : I 1'111 n Il "II ~ . ,~~ ---" .-"- \. " " , fL'",..,',"
J.-L i :.; ',' = I ,I, Ai -- ' -- ;{~ . ')J' '/J . . ' \it.\.-." .'
i:l...t I, ;:\:; = L.__...._._ ~ = I I -i- UI/:r ..l~""'" ..:i; ... /,.1:,\::;' '~::
'I I , ,., " ; -;:l , r-:: l I'I~-- ,,~- f)f;:;; '(fE' . . ' , I ,,'" ,
\i, l, "\~; 11"11' r-....... I -illl I /~ nr- ' .<;J1~" , ", l\\\-",s,~'-<.-',!
.'''' t I', ',- V,I .". Ie-' - I E~! I =- .I~" " ,..: Cd , ~ Ii.: .,~ ,,\<\ \~,,'t.:~~.:):
. I'Hl:.f'1, 1\ I\:~. if; 'I~!::::: I li!a I ,~ ,'. -". V;rU"':~L ..:-~E !'t ;\:":::'::-~;::-
,r I '1 - I:ls I ~ L' ...J ~ ~. ~ '" 'l.; '". -:-~...... .
It' /: 'I ' ....~ '~. ~ ------ /, ,. ,'/; -&&....-- r - ,~., . !i:. ,.,' :$-""
;'i 11,:: ,\, , h- I~, ~ i= ..;'4 f /' ~~, :-:.."".... ' t., .,~ .' I};.:':;; '.',',.-':',:!E :,,:;~.;
"" ".; . "," /. 1;;" 0"" "I, f",:",;~- '.,,-r ~ N'" , U1 ~'.
:. . .d ,cn..k "," _:.t:' ;),>J......~,."'" 'S'::m'l . ",['\"0,;,,,.,
\ \'[, f~.' "l~ ii <~I^~;:J~ 1i1"/'IT'~~'t;" :.:....= .' ,~./ .. '''~~ ij!$l;~.'~'J -~ i;>,,:..,(.j~;:;;:;; tr\.'~~~
,,+iti ~~.' ". ," - \'-.'-lg,--<r ;,'ffl ,'" ,_.-.~. ~' .,~. It<t '~'.'.:fJ;ij" <,0'. ~ ~ . '\';'~~' ':::,__":'
t~:; I, ~ '~8."'''" ~"'1UJ .',' n..\i:Y ){ 'ra':~'':c,J;> 0,;""~~:s~
I't I ~l!!' " ,f..... .~. a:: , "1'1 ~ J' -m~, ..:ft /A.; ,.' _,..\. \~,~:: \'~ffi7
, Ii I!' :, , . fBr v"'"'::> t.'" ." ..~, .~'~ ~, '~O"
(I\J :' ']1 ' .-Y' '''<( -.-- ~/ ~ ~~~Chrn .;;'\~' /... "",'::-,;" 'I '~'CO,
",j'l'"' : I ~. >, I (f1 ,,_, ~'r ~ ,~. \. '-- /~ f f.%/. \: ,,', :, :,r" 't ,~lJ!-'
I;!"',HI ,; I:~ ~';, /. ~1.1..!,II-J;fDlllj "q-J"Q.' c: ~~ ~, ~.-" lIG..\'0.'~ 'IIA".":"""\ jI:;.>Ui :",
'I" '-! 'I' ,/.' ...J " " /<: - . ";;Ijl, i'-'u'\! 1jf,' . \,.:::E , '.
:,': ,!/ "Y' cnr'.. Y':._Ii'!.. J' ,...,,~ /I"!fif ,; r' \,.. ,~k3:::"'"
..:', ,', i' It' _dm._ , :;:: 'l I/o "lQ i:= "'Ii: "'" ! . A . \, I.. :'\~ 1:> '.'
! I' Ill' t; 'r, f J i i =' - -l :~ (1;, . u_ /' 1ft:, fiJ'l'\; "~'~i' " ,.<~ w\\";:,:
li'ii, :rr':~ . illi i i =' ;; " :"'-'''',. .=.:.1.......... 'TI/P1'f'l'/IJ ",/ -:':'>~hA~'~-'-;-:
. ! i'~ i' ::1: i,: , . i -," i.' ~-~ . T . I-'-- (I H I III ,"'"-~ j . :, ,j. r., . . ~ \ Vi, '". :
. 1\ I " I ~ 'I ... 1:'" ---.-.~ -= il1.~ ~ ~,.. :!! ~~""'1 I " ,-" Jr}..~-,. 'm;
\1' ',:'ti: i i tt '- - ,,' III I,?, 1 =='. -- ",' ':qp :::: t;; l'tCr~ ~-'fJ~. ',' ~ if, / ,,/ .-, ...,<~\' 1 !,r~~~'"
!i1;i tl, ;::~:' ,l IIIT-t'-, - ".._,,~ '. --.,-= {.\,'" ~ ~~ i:' 'I, '," ,\.' 'l'\,:.::-g.
. ,', -! :,I~",.. 1" 1 =6 ~' ;,,; '_' ."'.'.....:.7 ,'. , 'i I' "
~I~I ,.','i L..._..c._.:......_-j ;'" . . '..' ~'S:o..:.. r/' 't ~ ;'" /.7'00..;.,;).' '.' 'I""': -
" : I;; I ;:!d"i' III 11111 i 1lm1l' , !/~&. ~~ "'- '-J ;). ~~fi'~.~. ' /' / '~" '.' : \Ik .:. :".
111'11' I' ',i ' /~ ~"- ~~ .""', ......./G. ",I ,'/ ,/' ..'..:~ tU"': '."I:.,~
ll' !i' 'i !!" "~', i 1111.11'1 ;,If \.,:~...... :~~.. :::-'" p .~':..( I' . ; .'~ ':",'.' !"'It:; ",
"I~ ! I: ',.F ::I~ ,..1-1 --.-. .~ ""''V~ "~~" '.' \.. \ ~'\c' : }.f-\":'.''!t"
, ,I; LJ, 'q, i"~ 'I ' . ..........".'':] 'Ci/ II ""1 .. """ '. ,\, , ':;. ^,' \" '.. ....
". r~r::J:t; <g,. !. I'~~,i/;.~ '~~', ~/. ' '. \) ;:-~:; ,W\ ,..... '
"'!"I:I':I,i .1_1i' li!oJ: I ~''''''l' ,"-="-,, 'ie'/; l.lt "",..!.L/~<< ..... '.' " '," "~~"'l~' ',"'->
'1'(!: ~'u1: :~ m' ~ ~ .' [~~. /.II;"Jr-..."-~ ~,r-.'-l::)' 1 ''',. l':1'\s"1\t.!'~:f
"'1'--1 I' ': !". ~ ,~ . ~ - --":"",..,-<:---.::~, 09' ~'n~1 r"'t'oj' ,\J'j ",,~,' {jfj!JJ!., " " f' .)'c, ":1"1. ."
I. ,~; 'f, --~... . "" ,- . K'\.J' I Ir. "i~ "\ C:i~-
. ." , ",.,~, .....,...., , ,=--- . -, .....;;;;!?Jo,s r:.t.'P'tiJ ",' ~ /&.'11-1.1 ' _. ..,,'.., ....", 'c","
i~ iT' -~"," 4~;~;,,:-jf/f:'?,-~~:;:::~j~:;,-~... ,-'~ ",'" ~ - '... ,1f""')i :;;s~~r'~:" : " .i ;',....~ \;-:t~~:
11j"}f 'I.;' .".,,~ il%s:.l,'Y"":';b,<<tO"'=:~-;~"-""j"J:;"'t-;f:;~::>r"",,, ,:,_:-~:::t -;-;. t\:'" ~.., ~~"7."i ," i' !.' 'I i~:"."~',>::':
",;.. ill ill! I / rtl~' ,\,-,;;-' ".- .-_o~~.",-~.~......".""",,,- ~'i'~~""" r !Ji\'~''/ ! " , ,. f') '"
J:'. :~ :ii' ~ ' . ' ,~' j!::~':';;'::" '. ".' /;'~"'~~'1'::;~~:7:?f{.;,"~~, -~~O""''''c' ~> "', oll,' i' ',.
"f'\o.' _,,:;;-"';::\ ..._/-~. !:i JI':_-~~--,~..-=-~_ --?~~!-F-y,;. -.. _. : - ,..,~_ T~ ~ ~".. [, -',..." . ~i"\ ,h~l ...,. <
, . .-, ~ .. " ',-- - ~",,~..... ~ I .~ " i,~\ ""~
,,'" /:;/ \ ...;' ~ ;~ >'1 ;".,.~-~,...::!'. "J.: " ~ ~l '.-, '\.. ----. L" _ ......,?;,,71,....~~ J'l ,.\ ~- ~ \1 1,', \
I --" ..-- ~--" .- ... ~ ""'''''' ' 1'1"
. "'/. ....-~..~-'... f "'o---:.'-.,-"-'''.,,.. ':"'-"{;;b:~~~.r "-,':,' 'M""'.,:-:-;: '.' " I I 'I
: {, ~,II'I ,- ' .,~ ..,', ,r' 'Vp'fi"'" ".'1"",''''~ " "--0; '" '<;l
. 1 I ! '\: I' .,- ,7;T-O.,..T-....L.-::_,Z;J;-'::-.n' ' /1 (7~! ',.'''' -. ~-,: ,'~...~~~~, 'j -_ \ __'~l" _.f ':.
" \~ ~ I,;~ -"'; ,I ''':;;''_:;'-~~_="".......~:-~;..-;-~:;"___~..,._:.~",,. .loer..t.Nsn,"r'" -~ - ,1" ,~,"t~''';'''-'''--........_, "...,fi:... '...L':,
, '~'I.; -.-..- ,'- - ",' .. "'..' H" v/8"'<,-' '-, ' ~, ,~,~.. "1'1'=: -
, ' I' . ~ . ! , .. ", - ..... " <' 1 e G/p-rl '"<.t f ,," r~' '. 0/.. '~, "., , ,,~--"--7
........ I , , -. 'r' ... .-. , ~ -- ,." . '" 81" "././81 ,~' . '.- ' " ~--' : "
:t:~.:s:=_ " I .<i .. I' / l...lo, /.,. r\~'< -.. ~'1 ':{ l:PnrvS(]I'fj- I,... ~,' '. _ - -...._.... .... :~'1' ,
, " '" ,. ,- ~" , " ~ - lI! /' r;:" "'-CoP J,., 'I1r tI/ '- ~ " ... I
, ' I I I" I: :, I - "'-... ,-t,' ,,",><;-H-J': _T ~-'.~" ,. ''', ,., "c ':I,j, ~IIOSpt; !!j" -...t:~ ' :;f;- "'-_...~ ; ;
~, ;; '1 \:\J i -- - '~" I ~ ~'J:~;"~~"'~l' .~:._~:~~~~, ;,;~,' ,u, ~~.~. ~ ,~-~~~O~fV ~"j"'-'.':'.'l,'_- Q"~IJ ,,~. --,"" j '~
. : , i i" ,m - " ,~li,~~i,;~~,~c,t:;;;;;~J~, .i"'>"tfl~Q~7::~';;: ,':1 .IL__'
!
.
e.
'f/ 9!iI" ZZ. Ll /!lO!;WllS ;LlllIllXll
.t~:.. '. '. " . .' .' .
'~';>;~.:~_:."':';:'-~,..........olA. .......:.....olA...:..i... ...............;.. ~.......,:..:.....:-........... _ _ ~ ....... _;:.,..~.~ _ _ ...... ...... .- ...... ......
...... .-;........'":.
!
41.... .. ...... ..... ......
U.liI ll: ... ..... ...
IH I IH 1m IH
>-
-l
E
~
I
g It
c~h
lblbt:.lblb
inn
..,..
:,tl
..... ..
....
sU!
.
e.
-l
,
i
i
i:. ,}:-
l-t:t . '
I \ . .
! }\-
Ji( \ ·
c_ I
. .." 'I.
,,-,'
, I
" r
;
..
,
'.
'.~. ~
.1,i
,1-.
.~ ;:
'.~ .,
i,j
I l
. .!
,
l ~
'it\
,;
. '!
I !j
r.
i
! i
II
o
ZU)
<(<( 0
zw~
<(0::9
-J<(g
a.. en ~
w::> Q..
I-CI)
-
CI)
..
l\
..
i
_ ll!
~lii
i"
~Ji
A
.~?;.:~
-'
.'~'(-
-1
,'('I)'
-~
9!;1" ZZ. Ll J.lllllOOl
f'
T
,,,.....''''
!,.,,~- ,
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SECTION LEGEND,
PLANS AND SECTIONS
Exhibit C: Landscape Section and Plan Legend
Exhibits C-1a (Plan) and C-1b (Section): Rancho California Road/Sub Area B
Interface
Exhibits C-2a (Plan) and C-2b (Section): Rancho California Road/Sub Area A
Interface
Exhibits C-3a (Plan) and C-3b (Section): Sub Area A Interface at East
Exhibits C-4a (Plan) and C-4b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area B Interface
Exhibits C-5a (Plan) and C-5b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area A Interface
Exhibits C-6a (Plan) and C-6b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at East
Exhibits C-7a (Plan) and C-7b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at South
R;\D P\2000\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Changes.doc
24
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
(')
CD
:! -)
;< )
/
~
0-
<(
::E
j1jl/)
.~. !z
. .
EXlIBIT SEcTlOa-17.22.156 C
.
!.
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.
, CONiCAl DECIDUOUS BROAD CANOPY
i
J STREET TREE TYPICAl DECIDUOUS TREE TYPICAl
MEDIUM FOREGROUND. 1 6' CONCRETE.
SHRUB MASSING TYP. SIDEWAlK TYPiCAl
LARGE BACKGROUND SMALL FLOWERING ACCENT
SHRUB MASSING TYPiCAl SHRUB MASSING TYPiCAl
\
( \
\ \
i
, \ \
.1
.j \\
I RESTAURANT
r UPRIGHT EVERGREEN
',\ TREE TYPiCAl 1.....1
PYRAMIDAl EVERGREEN
TREE TYPiCAl
PLAN VIEW .~
Rancho CalUornia Road I Sub Area B Interface
NTS
,r
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
I
','
o
'.
:\
\(
.I
\ )'
, '.~
EXllDlI'l SECTIONMl1. 22 .156 C
.
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.
lARGE BACKGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL
PYRAMIDAL EVERGREEN
TREE TYPICAL
6' CONCRETE
SIDEWALK TYPICAL
CONICAL DECIDUOUS
STREET TREE TYPICAL
BROAD CANOPY
DECIDUOUS TREE TYPICAL
SMAlL FLOWERING ACCENT
SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL
2
OFFICE
MEDIUM FOREGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYP.
MINOR ENTRY MONUMENT
PLAN VIEW ~
Rancho California Road I Sub Area A Interface
NTS
<:>
I- ~~~
Z - I-
~~ liioS
-w
o' -' 0- (:S::l;Q.
5~ V) (5 oC(~
~- ~
0 ~~ <:>
0::<:> ~<:> ~ Q)
<:>z o::z ~~
w- Uw w- 0
0:: V) ~V)
o!tl ww o!tl td
00:: o::~
"':::1: I- ~::l; 1:
~~ .0-,
::l;1D -,ID 8~ Q)
2~ -w ~~
00:: Zo:: 0 -
W:I: 8lii Coin C
::l;V) V) V) -
0 i<,. <(
~ '"
I .td
0 Q)
~. L-
! <(
.a
.'
ID ::J
CI)
Co -' --
~ Q.
"0
0:: .~
i td
ZID 0 '.
, ::l;~
in V) a:
J Nd td
0 .-
...J - C
IDID
'" L-
V) C\l0
- w I~
If)-
~~ C\I td
I . > zO
~ Co 00
i. '1 ~ bg
" ~
~ ~ ~ w as(/)
CI) a: 1z
.\ ~ ~ ~~ 0
-'Ill
ii IIlw
w w ~ ~cr
~~ ~~ 0<:> H<
'1 o::z N>
<:>-
, 01- 01- ~V)
j ~~ ~~ ~~
0
00:: ~. wID
oC(<:> ~Q <:>~
00:: .00 0::0::
lB~ o::w :5~ ( )
mo
j
. EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
b\
i
!
-j
i
;
!l
",
i
;
f)
: EXHIBIT 'SECTION 17.22.156 C
.
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.
BROAD CANOPY
EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAl
lARGE BACKGROUND
SHRUB MASSING' TYPICAL
MEDIUM FOREGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYP.
PYRAMIDAL DECIDUOUS
ACCENT TREE TYPiCAl
3
~
f'.- ..-
'I I,
(J)C"-J
..-
<X> ,
..- ' ,
C"-JLO
..- t-r)
OFFICE
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
'f
%0000
%
:z:
I,
I
..-
0:::
I-CO
~
CONCRETE BLOCK
PERIMETER WALL TYPICAL
VINES ATTACHED
TO WALL TYPiCAl
PLAN VIEW ~
Rancho California Road / Sub Area A Interface
NTS
EXlUBIT SECTION
17.22.156 C
p
t....
b
t4
· t;r'
.}j~
4p
.!"
-'
tS ~
~ _ lIl.
00. ~~
z>- otS 0 a:
.... ~I- ~_ z>-
>-.... 00 00. 61-
o.g: o::z u~ 0:: 0
o Oiij .... 0 z
~;z; ~lIl' 0.... ....-
Ul::l u<( .... 0:: III
0:: ~::i! ~ e ~
~ ....00 91- ::i!
~o:: o~ ~::i!Z ::i! 00
~ ~o:: .... ~
~ ::;>:1: u - ~
00 .JlIl U 8 0::
<( ::i!Vi
"
'/
~
~
i~
~
~~
u-' :::J
g:;{ 80
oo~ :I:-
....0:: ~~
w~ ~-'
0::.... -'
CJ::i!' lIl<(
20:: ....~
8.... Zo
a. 51-
i~
i ~
o
0::
~ III
....
0:: a::
L5 <(,
It: >
-
gJ
W
-
as
8
as
't:
CD
-
(1).&
J.,<c
Z as
o ~
F<C
0.0
~ ~Ul
, (f.)'Z
10
N
..u)
EXHIBIT SEcTION 17.22.156 C
lARGE BACKGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYPiCAl
x x
i
i
I
!
!
PYRAMIDAl DECIDUOUS
ACCENT TREE TYPiCAl
RETAIL
4
PYRAMIDAl EVERGREEN
TREE TYPiCAl
BROW DITCH
BROAD CANOPY
EVERGREEN TREE TYPiCAl
MEDIUM FOREGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYP.
SMALL FLOWERING ACCENT
SHRUB MAsSING TYPICAL
f-r
[j
4
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
5' CONCRETE
SIDEWAlK TYPiCAl
VINES ATTACHED
TO FENCE TYPICAL
8' TUBULAR STEEL
FENCE TYPiCAl
PLAN VIEW
Sub Area C / Sub Area B Interface
NTS
~..
,)
KlDIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
.
-'
<(
au
w-
5~
.<(
~~
Z
-' UI""'
W w....
w
In-' ~g
S()
=J
IIiw
=>u
I-z
_ W
ex> .....
~~ ~g
=>t: g-
~Cl g~
g 8z ~""' ...!
- ~~ Ow m~
-' ~ e~ cil=
() 0
~~ ~~ ~~ ~-~
=> 01- W:I: U
~~ g~ ~UI <(
~~ ~ r5
IIi o~
~~ lB ~
~~
:s~
w
0-
OUl
-'w
UI(2
':':~
N
0
d ~~
!ZJ.. ~~
~~
I ~()
i u- I
<~
-'
Cl <(
~C) ~ I u
~z ~~
w-
~Vl
9~ if ~l<:
.....~ U-'
-,aD 5 8~
<'~ ~
:;) 0
~:I: inUl
VlVl ~
^
CD
o
as
1:
~ ~
-
m
as
CD
L..
<(
.0
::J
en
'il:t-..
~O
as.
~~
1=<(
0.0
W ::J (/)
CI) en !Z
_J
EXHIIIIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
-'
BROAD CANOPY
DECIDUOUS TREE TYPiCAl
lARGE BACKGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYPiCAl
BROAD CANOPY
EVERGREEN TREE TYPiCAl
PYRAMIDAL. EVERGREEN
TREE TYPICAl
PYRAMIDAl DECIDUOUS
ACCENT TREE TYPiCAl
MEDIUM FOREGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYP.
.,
8' TUBUlAR STEEL
FENCE TYPiCAl
VINES ATTACHED
TO FENCE TYPiCAl
5' CONCRETE
SIDEWALK TYPiCAl
,.
,
~
PARKING
5
I
I
I
TWO STORY
OFFICE
I .
I
I
5
I
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
~
PLAN VIEW
Sub Area C / Sub Area A Interface
NTS
(,)
~
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
.
, .
I
I
~
~ ~~
::J .... 0
u ~~!3~
~ 01- ~iii
.... gVl 0!f2
:::> .....~
>-~ 0
Q. o=> ~m
01- <0 2:::>
Zz 0- 00::
<........ O::~....::I:
U me ~Ul.
0!3
(50::
85~
~
.~~
=>
OCl
o::z
Cl-
ll<:Ul
5i!f2
m~
....m
Cl=>
~~
Cl
Z ...J
- ...J
.~ ~
<VI
Q.
...J
o(s
....-
::I:~
5i
~~
Z
...J Ul....
t:I w......
I-...J ~o
Ul< ...1-
~g
:::>~
m....
i=~ .
. ....
co.....
....
Q.
OVl
...J....
Ulo::
~~
N
I ;;=::1:
OU
a::!:::
me
,! e
'J ~~
~J.
I a::
1 ~~
., ....<
i Uu Ul...J
u- :::><
<~ ou I
:::>-
Cl ~~ ~
~Cl .~ :J.
o::z d
....- . ........ ~~
;;=Ul .0.... ::E ffi
0!f2 ...JO:: ~ ....
~~ <I- O::ll<:
91- 0 U...J
...Jm ~~ 5 ~~
...J:::> m
<0:: u....
~:I: ~5i ~ 0
UlUl ioUl
Q)
o
aI
t:
Q)
-
c:
-
)
,.- ..~
<C
aI
Q)
L-
<C
.a
:J
CJ)
1.0"""'-
.},O
zal
O~
F<C
O.a
W :J (f)
CJ)CJ)'Z
( )
---~/
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
LARGE BACKGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYPiCAl
MEDIUM FOREGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYP.
UPRIGHT EVERGREEN
TREE TYPiCAl
5' CONCRETE
SIDEWALK TYPiCAl
~
/
/
SING~~j7'AMIL Y
RESI~1'1j TIAL
/ .~
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL.
6
I
:0
(
BROAD CANOPY
DECIDUOUS TREE TYPiCAl
BROAD CANOPY
EVERGREEN TREE TYPiCAl
LAWN TYPICAL
8' TUBULAR STEEL
FENCE TYPiCAl
,.
L.O
-
-
-
-
-
-
PLAN VIEW
Sub Area C Interface at East
NTS
rJ
~.
. mrnmIT SECTION 17.22.156C
.
~
~
w
-' ~~ 0-,
. w 85
w 0
!n~ ~~ ;;::-
~ (.:)~
~- O~
~.~ ::sa. <(.:) ~w
::I~ o~ !nU il
OOw ~~ -z
::I xw
0(.:) ::Iu ...........
Q:Z .....z
(.:)- . .....
l<:lf) 00......
u~
-~~ ~m
.....00
(.:)::1
5~ ia:
Cl
Q:
~13
~~ b) H_
Q: m
a,J .w
1ii
CI)
z 0
, ~ m
,
I "t
I()
-t CI)
-
~l (0.&
cl,O
~ Zm
~5
~ o - u- O~
5~ <a.
..... Cl (.:)~ ~<l F<
Q:(.:) ~(.:)
~~ c>z Q:Z U.o
w- w-
0"'" ~Ul ;;::Ul itffi W ::::J Ul
z(/) o~ o~
5::1 ......~ iZ~ !J~ (J) (J) !Z
0
0::1 ~oo -,00 "
<59 2::1 -'::I )
OQ: <Q: ~~
Q:~ .....:1: ~:I: /
IDO ~Ul (/) (/)
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
.!
I-
Z-'
~()
0-
<~
o . <:>
~~ ~~
o w-
~ 3= en
5~ O~
~iii~~
~ ~! ~;
~~ ~~ enen
D:: ~en
<:>w
n:W
~~
z
-'w
:;tw
~5
en en
en-,
5()
~-
9~
o.
Ww
Ow
:;t~ .
9....
~~
j
, -
,
I
-'
()
~~
~
0<:>
n:z
<:>-
~en.
~~
3=:1:
O~
Ir-
mo
Q:..I
. )
-' -'
w <
w 00
~~ 5~
~p.. ~w
~(::. <0
z
mw enw
~o w'"
I-z
- W ~o
Ul... >....
III11I11II1I1I11I1
III11II1IIIII1I111
III1II1IIII1II1111
111m m
111111111111111'"
11,11'11,111'1,1'
'11111111~lr
111-1
~~
~ffi
i~
w
Q.en
Ow
-' -
enD::
~
~
.. .
N
o
Ir
~t3
D::~
~~
Ir
-'
()
wii:
t;j~
D::~
o
8~
o
iniii
~
.c.
-
::::J
o
CI)
-
as
CI>
o
as
1:
CI>
-
".6
~o
zas
oCl>
I=~
O.a
W::::J(I)
Cl)CI)~
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
.
lARGE BACKGROUNO
SHRUB MASSING TYPICAl
PYRAMIDAl DECIDUOUS
ACCENT TREE TYPICAL
5' CONCRETE
SIDEWALK TYPICAL
BROAD CANOPY
EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL
MEDIUM FOREGROUND
SHRUB MASSING TYP.
.1
PYRAMIDAl EVERGREEN
TREE TYPICAL
8' TUBUlAR STEEL
FENCE TYPICAL
SMAll EVERGREEN
SCREEN TREE TYPICAL
7
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
fnJ
".;
I
j
......
"
:!
26
'23
PLAN VIEW
Sub Area C Interface at South
NTS
@
( )
Guidelines:
. Accent trees with fall or flowering color should be used as identify plantings.
. Low-scale walls, shrubs and groundcovers with annual or perennial color
should be used to highlight key areas, such as the base of project entry
monuments.
. Trees should be massed to create an effect similar to native plantings in
undisturbed areas.
R:\D NOOO\OO-OI40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Changes.doc
25
,
i
....J
CIllS
::l_
~.~
0....
w....
00::
I-
~W
-....
Zo::
01-
OCll
i
{
d
a:
<(
Z
a:
ft
:J
<(
o
o
::r:
o
Z
<(
a:
I
I.
i
....J
lS
~
Ow
z....
0::0::
........
~CIl
S::l
......0
....J::l
....JQ
~8
VlO
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
CIl
0::
........
Z""
~S
::l-
zD..
~oId
~::l
!z~
........
o::~~
oz_
JOD..
::::Eiii~
....J
....<
Z::l
....z
Uz
~<
o old
Zo ....J
0:: Z <
....iii U
~Vl-
Q<D..
C:::.~
....JlD 0::
....J::lQ
<0:: ....J
:::.xo
VlVl U
~
~~
o::~
u....J
~~
U....
o
'Coiii
<:> .
~~
o
0::0
OZ
w-
0:: VI
e~
:::'ID
2::l
00::
wx
:::'VI
g
!2~
::l
00
O::Z
Cl-
:.::VI
~~
wID
Cl::l
~~
I-
Z
<(
0:::
:J
~
(/)
W
0:::
....
~~ :;;
0"" ~
~~ ~..J
00 lS
0::l::J VI {1.
~QO ffi ~
0::f;3e- ~ VI
mo'::: a.. 0
~
VI....J
55
::>-
~~
Ww
Ow
:;;i~
QI-
~~
~~
z
....
....
0::
o
0::
....
~.
a..
j:~
t:>
-....
o::w
a.. 0::
::ll-
z
(/)0
<(~
01-
(/)
w
t;j
0::
o
Z
o
o
'... --'
-
C
CI>
E
:J
C
o
~
3:~
We
5w
ZL-
<(.g.
...J as Vl
a.. ~~
)
EXBIBlT SECTION 17.22.156 C
=f,S
m5
::>-
0::0.
:r:~
1II
1-0::
--' vi zO
--' w--'
< ow..... O~ 00 Z
.0 00 0
00:: woo 5
1II111 zOo <--,
z~ 1II",~ ::>~ C)<
::> w w 0 z::> G:o::
OC) o . 0::C) _z -w
o::z lk!W:r: <.:lz o::z I-z
<.:l- w- w< ~3:
l<:1II ::Jo 0::1II ~~
o~ .........-L5 o~ go
3:~ W
~:::; a. .....:::; --' Ofu
--' 0--, .....<.:l
wm a.z< --'< :::;m --'~ w
<.:l.::> <300 1II0 2::> --'1II -,>-
0::-
0::0:: _a. ~O:: on:: ~~ 00.
:S~ Jdl-~ N~ .w:r: 0::0
:::;1II 1II:::; 0.0
o:::r: _
w<.:lo
I-::>w
~o~
O::z
! . _3:-
!! a. :::;
.Ill::>
:r: --,.
lIIl<::::!::J
ZO <
.G:o~==
--'--,
om<o::
OlllZ~ -
OlllO::Z C
::>:s~:s G>
lii<.:l~a. E
~
c
0
~
Z >-
--' 0-=
~ 0:: 5 ~tfi
~:::;
a. z-
~ :s~ I- fij L.
<.:lw a. .Ill gf5. .~
Zw
0::0:: :r:a. :r:--,
WI- !:Q< !:Q--, ~~ ...J ~ ~
3:1II ~o ~~ woW z
~b ..... 0
.....0 "- OW ->-
03:--' I-m
--,::> ,1> o < o~ ~~
) --,0 0--'S:2 Oz
<0 ::>--'0. ::><.:l Zo
:::;w .9 lii~~ 1-- ~o
1II0 1II111
..9'"",Z
Secondary Entries
Secondary entries delineate the entry to the project interior. They are located at
the westerly and easterly edges of the project along Rancho California Road.
Design elements may include accent plantings, low scale walls, and
monumentation.
Guidelines:
. Shrubs and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used at
the base of project entry monumentation.
. Accent trees, such as palm trees or crape myrtle varieties should be used to
identify entries.
R:\D P\2000\OO-Ol40 Village of Temecu1a\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
26
_.- .,.---.
j~i~;r" ".t
EXHiBIT SECTION 17.22.15
"j
d
a:
<(
Z
a:
f(
:J
<(
()
o
:r:
()
Z
<(
a:
-'
1-<
z=>
wz
oz
~<
Cloll:!
~Cl-,
o::Z <
W-O
~~-
~~~
-,m 0::
r )ci~ g
_ ~IO
VI VI 0
Vl5
=>-
00.
5~
Uw
Ww
00::
I-
5w
-w
Zo::
01-
OVl
VI
0::
I-W
Zl-
~S
=>-
Za.
o oil:!
~
~::J
I-~
Z
wW-,
o::Cl<
O~!:?
ZCla.
S1in~
5
~
Clw
~w
0::0::
WI-
~
OVl
-'=>
L...o
-,=>
-,0
<-
~tl
VlO
-'
()
~~
O::li<:
0-,
6~
Ow
o
win
.
o .
~~
o
O::Cl
ClZ
w-
0:: VI
e~
~
~m
2=>
00::
WI
~VI
.
x .
5
~~
=>
OCl
o::z
ClVl-
li<:!,?
~:E
m-
w=>
Clo::
SVi
5
~ 5
lQ ~
~ VI
a. 0
~
w
t;j
0::
o
Z
o
o
~I
o
=>.
3~
Ww
Ow
-,0::
<I-
91-
~z
a?~
t~
Z
w
w
0::
Cl
0::
~.
a.
5:~
!::!w
O::w
0.0::
=>1-
~
-
c::
Q)
E
::::J
c::
o
~
~.b
saD
ZL..
<(0
....J .~ VI
Q..~~
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
...J ;j
~ =F,S ...J
O~ 00<
Oil: M9-,Z z~ :::lU
z~ :::l~ ~~
:::l 0
Ot:> Q:t:> en
o::z t:>z I-Q:
t:>- w- zO
~en Q:en
~~ O~ w...J Z
uO
1L.:=< UU 0
wOO :=<00 <(...J 5
t:><(
t:>:::l 2:::l z:::l G:Q:
0::0:: OQ:
~~ WI _z -w
:=<en ffi~ !ZZ
~oId w3=
90
...J lJfu
1L.t:>
Vl ...J~ W
OWIL. ...Jen ....,>-
~en O~
w90 <( Q:O
en en en:=< ~u
'.' ~..,~
U W
w.
O::~I
...JU
........-<(
~~w
I ~::z;j
<(OU
UQ:-
-~
oIdl-~
I
0:: t:> .
w:::lO
~O~
Q:z
-3=-
I ~~~
1 I ...J'
Ul~:::!::l
~g>-~
tJ.. -oJ -,. -
om;jo:: C
UVlz~ Q)
u~tz
:::l w~ E
\ I- I-
Ult:>Z~ :J
, C
, (
0
~
Z >-
...J Q.b
~ Q: FC
~ W
I-:=< <(w
~ z-
~~
t:>w >L..
~W ~oId WO
O::Q: I I...J ...J .&;; Vl
WI- W en~
~. 0 -<( !!l...J W~!z
OUl ~ ~U ~~
...J:::l II...
.....0 t:>...J ........
...J:::l 0~...J OW
...JO ,t ::c...J U <( U~ )
<(U en~ U...JU' Uz
:=<w z :::l...Jil: :::It:> .~ .
UlO ,S G:@ lii~~ 1--
UlVl
Project-Wide Hardscape Concept
Hardscape elements should be used in coordination with the architecture and
landscaping to provide a link between the street edge and individual
developments. Attention to hardscape details can create a strong sense of
community by relating different developments to an overriding theme. In
addition, property hardscaping can improve pedestrian safety, movement and
visual enjoyment of public areas.
a. Pavino Materials
The use of enriched paving treatment has been recommended for the major
entry into the site and intersections to highlight key areas of the streetscape.
Guidelines:
. Paving materials that incorporate natural rock or stone are highly
recommended.
. Major intersection and project entry crosswalks shall be highlighted by
enriched paving treatments such as stamped, colored concrete, interlocking
pavers or cobblestones to visually denote crosswalks.
. Near buildings, paving materials should be consistent with major intersection
treatments, using interlocking pavers, cobblestone, natural stone, or textured
concrete.
R:\D P\2000\OO-OI40 Village ofTemecula\Temecula Village PDQ. PC Changes.doc
27
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
SMOOTH CONCRETE BANDS TYPICAL
EXPOSED AGGREGATE
CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL
INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL
0\
I
I
5;//'~'~:<~'; ./~<; :":: <:'i:~"'C:;~"~.. I
~
o
\
I
f
,'~'::'
~':....:
....
.. ~..
..>:"."
:::';~
(
I
FREE STANDING PIlASTER
WI DIRECTIONAl SIGNAGE
& BUILT -IN LAMP TYPICAL
PLAN VIEW
Enhanced Paving at Intersection
Alternate 1
~
NTS
(
'-
I
I
I
Q
[
I
i
)
EXHIlIrr SECTION 17.22.156 C
INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAl.
SMOOTH CONCRETE BANDS TYPICAl.
EXPOSED AGGREGATE
CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAl.
COBBLE STAMPED COLORED
CONCRETE TYPICAL
\
/
~
o
o
\
/
I
I
.~ l"-:::'-':
Z l'~~::~.~'
'''~;':' ~':;'
'~':; ..~.~
....",.
:~.!':::~: ~.:
~:..' ....-
:......
:.....,...
........
~ :..~ ('':'
." .....
. -', -'~
;'~}~~::.{;~': ::.;.g;;~;~s
FREE STANDING PIlASTER
wi DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE
& BUILT -:-IN LAMP TYPICAL
PLAN VIEW
Enhanced Paving at Intersection
Alternate 2
~
NTS
b. Street Furniture
Hardscape elements such as benches, bollards, paving and light standards
should reflect the theme of the overall commercial center, complimenting the
architecture and landscape. Materials used in construction of street furniture
should compliment architectural materials used on adjacent buildings. Safety
and durability need special consideration.
Guidelines:
. Natural stone, rock, textured concrete, wood, or metal are all acceptable
building materials for street furniture.
. Street furniture should be located within gathering and/or shaded seating
areas within the center.
. All benches should be of simple design of wrought-iron metal, or concrete
with supports and scroll detailing and finished natural wood slats for the
sitting area.
. Trash receptacles and other minor details particular to individual parcels must
relate to the architectural style of buildings.
R;\D 1'\2000\00-0140 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDO - PC Changes.doc
28
EXBIBIT SECTION 17.22~156 C
!:
i'
I
iQ
BENCH
I
i:
( )
'- /
c. Walls and Fences
When necessary for security or to mitigate grading, walls or retaining walls and
fences can reinforce the project's identity and image. The material, style, and
height of walls and fences shall in order to ensure visual consistency, provide an
element of continuity throughout the center.
Guidelines:
. Construction materials and colors shall be consistent with the project
architecture with dark-toned hues and earthtone colors preferred. The use of
a hedge/bollard treatment is acceptable and encouraged.
. For walls built to screen ancillary structures adjacent to buildings such as
trash enclosures, construction materials should compliment the architecture.
. The horizontal mass of continuous walls should be softened by landscape
planting and vines.
. Tubular steel or an equivalent may be used for fencing.
4. Lighting Concept
In the design of lighting, careful consideration must be given the overall
architectural theme as well as to the safety of the site users. An emphasis
should be made to emphasize human scale in public areas adjacent to buildings
and along walks.
Guidelines:
. Warm white lighting is encouraged, bright colored or blinking lights shall not
be allowed.
. Light standards will blend architecturally with buildings, pedestrian areas, and
other hardscape elements.
. Design and placement of site lighting must minimize glare affecting adjacent
properties, buildings and roadways.
. Natural stone and concrete may be used for light standard bases.
. All lighting shall be consistent with the Mt.Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
. "Old town Style" lighting fixtures, either attached to building or pedestal
mounted along pedestrian walkways and gathering areas shall be utilized.
R:\D P\2000\OO.Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
29
,
i
i.O
I
I
10
( )
"--_/
KXBIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
..
-.
II
LIGHTING STANDARD
5. Signage Program
A comprehensive sign program is provided for Temecula Village in order to meet
the different type of signage needs. Building-mounted signage will need to be
oriented to both to the pedestrian (internal to the project) and motorist (along
Rancho California Road). In addition, it will be necessary to be sensitive to the
existing single-family development to the south and east of the project site.
Monument signs will be permitted along the Rancho California Road frontage, at
project entries, which identify the comrnercial center, as well as the rnajor
tenants. Lastly, directional sign age will be necessary to safely guide throughout
all Sub Areas.
A. Guidelines
1. Appropriate.
. Generally, small, low key signage for tenant spaces.
. Building mounted signs for project identity.
. A limit of four colors on a sign. Additional colors are acceptable only
when incorporating a company logo.
. Eye level signs; window and door signs.
. Signs consistent with building texture, color and architectural style.
. Uniquely shaped signs that are related to the product or service
provided (i.e., barber poll).
. Signs that have illumination sources consistent with Mount Palomar
lighting standards and restrictions.
. Indi...idl,jal plastio oRaARSIIEllters.
2. Inappropriate
. Typical "can" or "box" signs with entire face areas made of plastic.
. Signs rnounted above building rooflines (parapet), or roof-mounted
signs.
. Signs that incorporate any manner of mechanical movement, audible
elements, flashing or intermittent lighting, and/or moving or otherwise
animated forms.
. Signs that interfere with or conflict with any traffic control device,
create a safety hazard by obstructing the clear view of pedestrian or
vehicular traffic or interfere with efficient operations of ernergency
vehicles.
. Signs, which prevent free access to or from any fire escape, door,
window or exit, or access to any standpipe.
. Landscaping or the use of annual or ornamental flowers that form a
sign or message.
. Signs not in scale with the pedestrian orientation.
. Vehicle signs.
. Signs extending above the eave or parapet, roof-mounted signs, non-
projecting signs which project more than twelve inches (12") from a
given building face.
. Signs painted onto building surfaces or trash bins and their
enclosures.
R:\D P\2000\00-Ol40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Vi.lIage POO - PC Changes.doc
30
. Signs with disproportionate, visually distracting, or reflective surfaced
background or graphics.
. Signs with non-contrasting background, graphics or font, which render
the sign illegible.
. Inflatable signs.
. Off-site signage.
B. General Sian Standards and Specifications
. The area of a sign or logo with individual letters shall be measured by a
rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol.
. Planning and Building and Safety Departments' review and approval is
required prior to the placing, erecting, moving, or reconstructing of any
sign within the Specific Plan area.
. All permanent signs shall require a permit prior to erecting or attaching
the sign.
. Signage that is not approved as part of the Development Plan process,
shall be approved administratively by the Planning Director.
. If a situation arises that is not covered by these sign regulations or the
type of permit required, the Planning Director shall provide written
interpretation after consulting the City's Sign Ordinance.
. All building-mounted signs shall meet or exceed all applicable city, state
and federal codes.
. All signs containing electrical components shall conform to the Uniform
Lighting Code.
C. Buildina-Mounted Sians
1. General.
. Signs shall be placed to be cornpatible with the building and accent
the architectural design of the structure.
. Sign colors should be compatible with the building's color.
. Signs and letter sizes shall be used which are complementary to the
building scale.
. Signs should have individually spaced letters.
. Signs shall have concealed illumination source, either internal or
external.
2. Wall signs.
. Signs attached to front walls and/or side walls of buildings shall have
a surface area not to exceed one (1) square foot per linear foot of the
respective face of the building. Sign attached to rear walls of
buildings shall have a surface area not exceeding one-half (~) square
foot per linear foot of the surface area of the rear face of the building.
No wall-mounted signs shall be permitted on the rear of the buildings
in Sub Area A, which face the existing single-family residential
developrnent.
. For storefronts thirty feet (30') wide or less, a maximum letter height of
8" is required.
R:\D P\2000\00-0140 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
"
. For storefronts 30'-60' wide, a maximum letter height of 12" is
required.
. For storefronts 60' wide or greater, a maximum letter height of 16" is
required.
. The maximum letter height allowed is 24".
3. Permanent Window Signs.
. Store identity, graphics, typography and/or company logo may be
silkscreened or etched on the tenant's window.
. The maximum square foot graphic area allowed per window shall not
exceed four (4) square feet or fifteen percent (15%) of the total
window area from the exterior of the building, whichever is greater.
. Signs will not be permitted on doors.
4. Awning Signs
. Twenty percent (20%) maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior
surface of each awning.
. Internal iIIurnination is prohibited.
5. Projecting Signs
. No more than one (1) projecting sign will be allowed per tenant.
. The maximum size may not exceed six (6) square feet and shall not
extend more than three feet (3') from the wall surface.
. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings and shall not be
illuminated.
6. Hanging Signs and Under Canopy Signs
. No more than one (1) hanging sign shall be allowed per tenant.
. Signs are permitted under a canopy and parallel to the parking lot;
maximum size of six (6) square feet; minimum of seven feet (1')
vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom
of the sign.
D. Monument Sians
1. General Requirements
. All portions of signs, including the base, shall be constructed with
materials and colors that are compatible with, and serve to
complement the building.
. All monument signs shall include the address of the site. Numerals
shall be no larger than ten inches (10") in height and no smaller than
six inches (6") in height.
. Low growing shrubs, groundcover and/or annual color shall surround
the base of the sign. The landscaping shall be a minimum of one (1)
foot distance from the sign.
R:\D P\2000\OO-OI40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village POO - PC Changes.doc
32
2. Specific Requirements
o Maior Monument Sion
o One major monument sign, not to exceed nine feet (9') in height
above grade with up to fifty (50) square feet of signage area shall
be permitted at the project major entry.
o Colors and materials for the sign shall reflect the center.
o Up to five (5) tenants may be advertised on the sign.
o Each tenant placard shall not exceed one foot (12") high.
R:\D P\2000\OO~Ol40 Village of Temecu1a\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C
.
I
I STUCCO FINISH
PIlASTER CAP
I
,
I .: ..' .
i
,... .
. .
. RECESSED GlASS BLOCK
0 wi WROUGHT IRON GRILLE
~
I INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED.
I ..., TYPICAL 4 SIDES
STUCCO FINISH
'0 MASONARY PIlASTER
I
c:o
i VIage Martot ~
i DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE
I <? Book store ,
N c GIla ~ MOUNTED TO PIlASTER
LEDGERSTONE VENEER
lD PIlASTER BASE
ALTERNATE:
I c:o COBBLE STONE VENEER
I PIlASTER BASE
.
~
J FINISH GRADE
i
I 6" 2' -6" SQ.
TYP.
i 3' -6" SQ.
I
ELEVATION
Pilaster Lamp / Directional Sign
NTS
(
Minor Monument Sians
. A minor entry monument sign, not to exceed five feet (5') in height
above grade with up to thirty-six (36) square feet of signage area
shall be permitted at each minor entry monument sign.
. Colors and materials for the sign shall reflect the center.
. Up to three (3) tenants may be advertised on the sign.
. Each tenant placard shall not exceed ten inches (10") high.
R:\D P\2000\()().OI40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ. PC Changes.doc
E. Directional Sians
. Shall consist of small-scale versions of monument sign design and
contain graphics conforming to the design for monument signs and
building mounted signs.
. Shall have contrasting background/graphic colors.
. Shall have direct or indirect concealed iIIurnination.
. Individual directional signs shall not exceed three (3) square feet in area,
or have an overall height exceeding three feet (3') above finished grade.
. Multiple-tenant directional signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet
in area, or have an overall height exceeding six feet (6') above finished
grade.
. Shall not contain logos.
R:\D P\2000\OO-OI40 Village of Temecula\Temecula Village PDQ - PC Changes.doc
35
EXHIBIT SECTION 17 . 22. 156 D i l.i,.t
.''*" r G..~'
,"."" IQ~'
';;".,1-
- J";~"i-' , .\il:~!
I " I~
~~-tf' n ~}". i 1~'N
""
!I
! - Ii I, . =1~li -
't'
"'[ ,
, " ~ " -r.:
! ~ 'i
. r', , ,
i .~
: ~' , I
.~ '''', .
, i h '-'f(!
,
( , ~, .
,
Ii l.ll' '"
-.to -'--? 11 Cl
t,~~; ~
I ~<4 -_-l{! .:iI ,
: w.~"f " ~
--L-_:t ~ ~I.:f. ~
" --.---.-J ,. _~i' ~
:1 .. --~'
., ~
- tJ
1
,
, ~
- -''''-jo; ~
/< ') ~ t
< -',
, ,
~", ec:, ; 1, i.{~,:
!I:: .
~.' " ~
~ "" 'I --- f l:'::~~-'; .,J
in'- i
---1
m
---.J. .~ -y z
~'. I ~r, w
....... (J
-~.~<~., !
-\- W
.':~ 11 "
---q:i ,,,.... ,', 0
' r ?' C
-_.~---- J i;-L~? ... !
~ : I', .- , "- ...
, : x.. -
I / , >
__..1!____
\ '~, C
. .' , 5
. -- -- - ., f
., "
, " ~
'" "
" .r
;1, .
, , ~
--l
~tj ~
it'
" -+
- --{t b1 3
.I....
H
,. 't*.....
-f' ."
,-, ! ..-.....
--..~..
"
---1i ~!
...;..;;. < -- - -., ~ , '-'
~ ... .
,ko. .3 !
rl) ~ -- ~~ '"
~. " Cl , t ~
'" . . '"
" ,-- ,-~; ~
~ t "
8 ~
~ , I' .,
S, ~ " - , ~ f?
~ ;. ~ - ""':'1: ,: ; s ~
" . '" :.. I: to.- '"
~ oj ~J~* i -..J ~
" i' '"
~ ~{-,~~ " l-
;[ ~ t::U ~ ~
,,, ~ ..
r~
'~;"0
:"-'l'.,l"
".'.'IL-'J1-:
F"l
.,.'-J'{rr:
';:~ ..~ -'-: ~':~ "::
"~l:':,
"':-:mft<..:.
~.ifl{,
.; .
~,;."
,.~..
1. ,. .,.....~
~.,. h. : "i;~, ,,' .tj
. " :.,;,.:):!
. "IDJ' "'''.
!"';'-:".'-,..:
. ";';'::,:'
"'1"; _"f);_;
Ii
I. .
...I
f......." ","
".
, ",:'
8
'l..
, el'
"Ii,
;-~t,
jJ~
"
i. ~
r}
>'f
.L
:.\~~ ~,
!.~l;
t ~_
I!
,~
~~
!If
S.~
'\o-j.': .
~l
1,
.t
EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 E
ATTACHMENT NO.4
DRAFT RESOLUTiON APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
RID P\2000l00-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
11
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0140, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 160 UNIT
APARTMENT COMPLEX AND EIGHT RETAIL OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 68,700 SQUARE FEET; GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST
OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012, 013, AND 014.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. MJW Property Group filed Planning Application Nos. PAOO-013a, General
Plan Amendment, PAOO-0139, Zone Change, PAOO-0140, Development
Plan, and PAOO-0152, Tentative Parcel Map, for the property consisting of
approximately 23 acres generally located south of Rancho California
Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Moraga Road intersection of
Rancho California Road known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 944-290-01 2,
013, AND 014 ("Project").
B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental
review was conducted as required by law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on February 20, 2002 to consider the applications for the
Project and environmental review.
D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-003 approving a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the
Project, Tentative Parcel Map and Development Plan for the Project and
recommended that the City Council approve of a General Plan
Amendment and zone change for the Project.
E. On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested
in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on
these matters.
F. On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for
the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 02-_ entitled "A
R:lResos 2002lResos 02-_
Section 2.
findings:
A.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE INITIAL
STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
FOR PAOO-013a, PAOO-0139, PAOO-0140 AND PAOO-0152,
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD,
WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012,013, AND 014."
The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following
The Project, including the Development Plan, is compatible with the
health, safety and welfare of the community. The Project, including the
Development Plan, has been reviewed and determined to be in
conformance with the City's General Plan. These documents set policies
and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the
community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles.
B.
The Project, including the Development Plan, is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
The Project, including the Development Plan, will not have an adverse
effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and
policies of the adopted General Plan. The Project does not represent a
significant change to the planned land uses for the site and represents a
relocation of existing land uses.
C.
Section 3. The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required in
Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed uses are in conformance with the General Plan and with all
applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The plan to
develop an office/retail center and 160 apartment units is consistent with
the General Plan land use designation of Office Professional and Medium
Density Residential for the site, provided the service station is deleted
from the plan.
B. The overall development of the land as conditioned, is designed for the
protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The
development plan for the site is consistent with the City's Design
Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable sections of the
Development Code and related Planned Development Overlay
document. Provisions have been made to minimize the visual impact of
the project, and all phases of construction will be inspected to ensure
compliance with the applicable building and fire codes.
Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Application
for a Development Plan (PAOO-0140) for the design, construction and operation of a 160 unit
apartment complex and eight retail / office buildings totaling 6a,700 square feet, generally
R:/Resos 2002!Resos 02-_
2
located south of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Moraga Road
intersection of Rancho California Road known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 944-290-012, 013,
and 014 subject to the specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 2002
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 02-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos 2002/Resos 02,_
3
EXHIBIT A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village ofTemecula\RESOCC DP .doc
]
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.
PAOO-0140 Development Plan
Project Description:
PAOO-0140 Construct 160 attached single-family
residential units on approximately 15.26 acres and a
68,700 square foot office/retail center on
approximately 7.71 acres.
Development Impact Fee Category:
Residential Attached and Retail Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
944-290-012, 013,and 014.
Approval Date:
February 20, 2002
Expiration Date:
February 20, 2004
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One
thousand three hundred and fourteen dollars ($1314.00) for the County administrative fee, to
enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code
Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-
eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development
Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project
granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of
the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim,
action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in
the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City
deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and conditions set forth.
R\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
t
4. After grading, all slopes shall be planted in accordance with the City's Slope Planting
Guidelines. Jute netting will be required on all slopes greater than ten linear feet.
5. An Administrative Development Plan application shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Department for buildings on Pads C, D, and E , prior to issuance of building
permits.
6. The final landscape plan shall indicate street trees planted along the Rancho California
Road frontage as a minimum of 24-inch box London Plane (Plantus Acerfolia 'Bloodgood').
7. Areas proposed for development in another phase occurring not within six months of the
completion of the previous phase shall be temporarily seeded and irrigated for dust and soil
erosion control.
a.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
10. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits A
through ff and the Color and Material Board on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
11. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer, Property
Owner's Association, or any successors in interest.
12. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
13. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with the Color and Material Board on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
Primary wall exterior:
9.
Entry Doors, Railing, Shutters
Roof
Fascia, Trim and Garage doors
La Habra Stucco "Cortez" (Base 200)
La Habra Stucco "Meadow Brook" (Base 100)
Frazee "Old Porch" LRV 10
Lifetile California "Mission Blend"
Frazee "Old Porch" LRV 10
14. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
15. The applicant shall submit the architectural design of the apartment buildings for Planning
Commission review. The architecture of the apartment shall be consistent with the
architecture of the office/commercial buildings. (Added by the Planning Commission at
the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
16. The apartment building on the east edge of the property in proximity to Lot numbers 36 and
37 of the Starlight Ridge Development shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the Planning
Department in order to reduce the negative view shed impacts. (Added by the Planning
R\D P\2000\Oo-0140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
2
Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
17. Prior to issuance of building permits, Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
shall be approved by the Planning Department and recorded with the Riverside County
Recorder. The CC&R's shall contain provisions for the creation of a Property Owner's
Association for the maintenance of all landscaping on the commercial parcels, and
maintenance of all internal roadway and hardscape surfaces within those parcels.
18. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian access from the east portion of the Apartment
Complex to Rancho California Road. A Site Plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. (Added by the Planning
Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
19. The applicant shall insure that all trees planted along the east property line of the subject
development be a minimum size of 24" box trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape
plans and resubmit the plans for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of a
building permit. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public
hearing)
20. The applicant shall add various tot lots throughout the apartment complex. The size, content
and location shall be incorporated in the landscape plans and submitted to the planning
Department for approval. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002
public hearing)
21. An Administrative Development Plan application shall be submitted and approved by the.
Planning Department for all (9) nine apartment buildings, garages, carports and clubhouse
proposed in this project. The applicant shall revise the architecture of the apartment
buildings by incorporating the elements found in the retail! office buildings proposed. The
elevations shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and be approved by the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. (Added by the Planning
Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
Prior to Issuance of an Occupancy Permit
22. All perimeter and slope landscaping, including the Rancho California Road landscape
planter area shall be installed to the approval of the Planning Director, prior to the first
certificate of occupancy.
23. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
24. A one-year landscape maintenance bond of sufficient amount shall be submitted and
approved by the Planning Department.
25. The applicant and owner of the real property represented by this approval shall join and
maintain active membership in the Crime Free Multi-housing Program. (Added by the
Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
26. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
2a. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this
project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no
cost to any Government Agency.
R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalDevelopmenl Plan COA's.doc
]
General Requirements
29. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
propose? ~asements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and
their omiSSion may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
30. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department
of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained
road right-of-way.
31. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
32. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for
consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and
shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit:
33. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Riverside County Health Department
f. Verizon
g. Southern California Edison Company
h. Southern California Gas Company
Development Plan
34. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of
Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
35. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all
soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered
structures and preliminary pavement sections.
36. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist
and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site
including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
37. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the
site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage
facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall
capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property.
The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any
upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall
be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall
be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
R\D P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
4
3a. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
39. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
40. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
41. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed
on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
42. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207 A and/or 208.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, 801, 802 and a03.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400,
401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
\. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301, 302 and/or 303.
g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
i. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties.
43. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise
approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets:
a. Street "A" (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft. with 50-ft. right-
of-way.
b. The driveway at the main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76-ft. with a
6' sidewalk on each side.
c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-ft. with a 6' sidewalk
on each side.
d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of
2a-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on each side.
e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards.
f. 90 parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum
safe distance from intersections.
R:ID P\2000100,0140 Village of TemeculalDevelopmenl Plan COA's.doc
5
g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration,
stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by
the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works.
h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90).
i. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul-
de-sac or a loop road.
44. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of 'Public Works.
45. The westerly and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. The main
driveway shall have full turning movements.
46. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities
shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
47. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject
property.
4a. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the
Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The City prior to commencement of the
appraisal shall have approved the appraiser.
49. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV,
and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
50. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
51. A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle
access for all private streets and drives.
52. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
53. A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval
of the Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
54. Parcel Map 29140 shall be approved and recorded.
55. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
56. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the
. approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and
accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
R:\O P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
6
57. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
5a. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
59. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as
determined by the Department of Public Works.
60. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards -110' RfW) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median,
deceleration lane.
(i) The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half
width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho Califomia
Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot.
(ii) The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the
existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road.
The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property.
b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed
main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an
additional 1 0' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane.
c. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal
equipment, loops, and interconnect.
d. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and
the main entrance.
61. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
62. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
63. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
64. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
65. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to
the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
66. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
R\D P\200Q\OQ.Q140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
7
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Riverside County Health Department
f. Community Services District
g. Verizon
h. Southern California Edison Company
i. Southern California Gas Company
67. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of
Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
68. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all
soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered
structures and preliminary pavement sections.
69. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist
and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site
including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
70. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the
site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage
facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall
capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property.
The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any
upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall
be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall
be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
71. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
72. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
73. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
74. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed
on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
75. Parcel Map shall be approved and recorded.
R\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
8
76. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
77. Grading ofthe subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the
approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and
accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
78. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
79. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
d. Southern California Edison
ao. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
al. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
82. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to
the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
83. Prior to installation of arterial street lighting, the developer shall file an application with the
TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said street lighting into
the respective TCSD maintenance program.
84. All parkway landscaping, slope areas and interior streetlights shall be maintained by the
property owner or private maintenance association.
85. The Developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure
areas.
a6. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
87. Class II bike lanes shall be included on the street improvement plans for Rancho California
Road. Any damage caused to the existing Class II bike lanes on Rancho California Road as
a result of construction shall be repaired or replaced, as determined by Public Works.
Prior to the issuance of buildinQ permits:
8a. The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement through the payment
of in-lieu fees equivalent to .97 acres of parkland, based upon the City's the current land
evaluation. Said requirement includes a 50% credit for private recreational opportunities
provided on-site and shall be pro-rated at a per dwelling unit cost prior to the issuance of
each building permit requested.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
a9. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
R:\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
9
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 199a National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
90. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 forthe regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
91. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
92. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
93. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
94. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
95. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998)
96. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
97. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
98. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
99. Provide house electrical meter provisions for powerfor the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
100. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 199a
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State
Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the
Building Official, to implement in the building design.
101. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
102. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
103. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
104. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
105. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
106. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
107. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
108. Show all building setbacks.
109. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
R\D P\200Q\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
10
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
110. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes that are in force at the
time of building plan submittal.
111. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-l. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1a75 GPM at
20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of a50 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2725 GPM with a 3-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A)
112. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of4 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-21/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and
adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
113. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
114. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020)
115. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC a704.2 and 902.2.2)
116. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
117. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for ao,ooo Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC see 902)
118. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
119. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
120. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
RID P\20001OD-0140 Village ofTemeculalDevelopment Plan COA's.doc
\I
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
121. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
122. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National
Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
123. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
124. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters andlor
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
125. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home
parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which
indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire
hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be
submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
126. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
127. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
128. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
in locations approved by the Fire Department. (CFC 902.4)
129. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
130. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
131. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
R:\O P\2000\OG-0140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
12
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
132. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
133. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the wildland-
vegetation interface. (CFC Appendix II-A)
134. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall
include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block
walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A)
135. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life
safety measures per 199a CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA -13,24,72 and 231-C.
136. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
137. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
138. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
139. The applicant shall comply with all the mitigation measures identified in the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Plan. (Environmental Mitigation Measures)
140. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the United
States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Services dated May 31, 2000. (Attached
letter)
141. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the Pechanga
Cultural Resources dated January 10, 2002. (attached letter)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalDevelopment Plan COA's.doc
Il
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R\O P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Development Plan COA's.doc
14
ATTACHMENT NO.5
, DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
RID P\2000l00-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
12
RESOLUTION NO. 02_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0152 - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 29140 RE-
SUBDIVIDING THE SITE FROM 3 LOTS INTO 8 LOTS,
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE
MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012,
013, AND 014.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
declare that:
R:/Resos 2002fResos 02-_
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
A.
MJW Property Group filed Planning Application Nos. PAOO-013a, General
Plan Amendment, PAOO-0139, Zone Change, PAOO-0140, Development
Plan, and PAOO-0152, Tentative Parcel Map, for the property consisting of
approximately 23 acres generally located south of Rancho California
Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Moraga Road intersection of
Rancho California Road known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 944-290-01 2,
013, AND 014 ("Project").
B.
The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental
review was conducted as required by law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
C.
The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on February 20, 2002 to consider the applications for the
Project and environmental review.
D.
Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-003 approving a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the
Project, Tentative Parcel Map and Development Plan for the Project and
recommended that the City Council approve of a General Plan
Amendment and zone change for the Project.
E.
On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested
in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on
these matters.
F.
On June 25, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for
the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 02-_ entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Section 2.
findings:
A.
Section 3.
declare that:
R:/Resos 2002lResos 02-_
ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE INITIAL
STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
FOR PAOO-0138, PAOO-0139, PAOO-0140 AND PAOO-0152,
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD,
WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012,013, AND 014."
The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following
The Project, including the Tentative Map, is compatible with the health,
safety and welfare of the community. The Project, including the Tentative
Map, has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the
City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that
protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and
circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles.
B.
The Project, including the Tentative Map, is compatible with surrounding
land uses.
C.
The Project, including the Tentative Map, will not have an adverse effect
on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and
policies of the adopted General Plan. The Project does not represent a
significant change to the planned land uses for the site and represents a
relocation of existing land uses.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find determine and
A.
The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the
subdivision are consistent with the Development Code and General Plan.
Each lot will conform to the minimum lot size requirement of the original
zoning district, and as permitted by the Planned Development Overlay
zone, may have parcels with access across other parcels created on the
same site. Conditions of approval will ensure that the common-use
facilities such as parking, sidewalks, and landscaping are maintained by a
Property Owner's Association.
B.
The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a
contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of
1965
C.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development proposed by the tentative map. Based on environmental
documents submitted with the application and an Initial Study which was
prepared by staff in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act, it has been determined that the site is physically suitable for the type
and density of development being proposed. Conditions of approval have
2
been added to ensure that final soils reports are submitted with the
construction plans.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with
conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental
damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat. Based on the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared which will provide
conditions and requirements to reduce the impacts of the project to a less
than significant level. City staff will ensure compliance of the mitigation
measures as provided in the Monitoring Plan.
E. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is
not likely to cause serious public health problems. All phases of
construction will be inspected by appropriate City staff to ensure
compliance with all construction and fire codes.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural
heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The project has been conditioned to comply with the Uniform Building
Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through
or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the
alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those
previously acquired by the public will be provided. As conditioned, the
project will be required to provide access easements across each lot to
provide for parking and on-site circulation.
H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication
requirements (Quimby).
Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Tentative
Parcel Map No. 29140, Application No. PA 00-0152, subdividing the existing 3 lots into a lots,
for the property generally located south of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road and
east of the Moraga Road intersection of Rancho California Road known as assessors parcel
no(s). 944-290-012, 013, and 014 subject to the specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A,
attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
R:/Aesos 2002lResos 02~ _ 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 02-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:!Resos 2002lResos 02-_
4
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FORA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village ofTemecula\RESO CC TPM.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.
PAOO-0152 Tentative Parcel Map
Project Description:
PAOO-0152 Tentative Parcel Map subdividing the
current three parcels, which are a portion of lot 24 of
Tract 3334, into 8 individual parcels.
Development Impact Fee Category:
Residential Attached and Retail Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
944-290-012, 013,and 014.
Approval Date:
February 20, 2002
Expiration Date:
February 20, 2004
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One
thousand three hundred and fourteen dollars ($1314.00) for the County administrative fee, to
enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code
Section 2110a(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-
eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development
Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project
granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The parcel map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the
requirements of the City of Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the
conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State
Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of
the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters ofthe City, concerning the Planning
Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim,
action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in
the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City
R:ID P\2000100-Q140 Village ofTemeculalParcel Map COAs.doc
I
deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and conditions set forth.
Parcel Map
Prior to Approval of the Parcel Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete
the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed
and securities posted:
5. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Rancho California Water District
c. Eastern Municipal Water District
d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
f. Planning Department
g. Department of Public Works
h. Cable TV Franchise
i. Community Services District
j. Verizon
k. Southern California Edison Company
I. Southern California Gas Company
6. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median,
deceleration lane.
(i) The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half
width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho California
Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot.
(ii) The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the
existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road.
The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property.
b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed
main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an
additional 1 0' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane.
c. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal
equipment, loops, and interconnect.
d. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and
the main entrance.
7. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
8. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Parcel Map COAs.doc
2
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207 A and/or 208.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the pUblic streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard Nos. aoo, 801, 802 and a03.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400,
401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301, 302 and/or 303.
g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
i. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties.
9. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise
approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets:
a. Street "A" (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 2a-ft within a 50-ft.
right-of-way.
b. The driveway at the main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76-ft. with a
6' sidewalk for each.
c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-ft. with a 6' sidewalk
on each side.
d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of
28-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on each side.
e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards.
f. 90 parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum
safe distance from intersections.
g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration,
stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by
the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works.
h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90).
i. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul-
de-sac or a loop road.
10. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
11. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho Califomia Road on the Parcel Map
with the exception of three (3) openings, as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel
Map.
a. The westerly and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-inlright-out. The main
driveway shall have full turning movements.
12. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities
shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. a05.
13. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or
R:\D P\2000100,0140 Village of Temecula\Parcel Map COAs.doc
]
other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department
of Public Works.
14. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an
existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to
City Council approval of the Parcel Map, the Developer shall make an application for
reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
15. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
16. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Parcel
Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A
copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The following information shall be on the ECS:
a. The delineation of the area within the 1 OO-year floodplain.
b. Special Study Zones.
c. Geotechnical hazards identified in the project's geotechnical report.
d. Archeological resources found on the site.
17. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject
property.
18. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the
Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion ofthese
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been
approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
19. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV,
and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
20. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
21. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as
determined by the Department of Public Works.
22. A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle
access for all private streets and drives.
23. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated
and noted on the final map.
24. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
25. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
26. A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval
of the Department of Public Works.
27. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
R\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Parcel Map COAs.doc
4
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located
outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the
final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept
free of buildings and obstructions. "
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
28. Parcel Map shall be approved and recorded.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
29. The applicant shall comply with all the mitigation measures identified in the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Plan. (Environmental Mitigation Measures)
30. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the United
States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Services dated May 31, 2000. (Attached
letter)
31. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the Pechanga
Cultural Resources dated January 10, 2002. (attached letter)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:ID P\200010o-0140 Village ofTemeculalParcel Map COAs.doc
5
CITY OF TEMECULA
"
G
. -- - -
11II
-'l.t'J~
--
.~ ::==
::o..:::::.~,.,.,._
--- -'--"'
=. .'_".1
- --
--......-
~ ~==-=
.,.'
~
.- -. --- -
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT -I
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
R:\D P\2000100-G140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs,doc
41
ATTACHMENT NO.6
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
R:ID P12000l00-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
1a
Planning Application No. 00-0138, 0139, 0140 and 0152 (General Plan
Amendment, Change of Zone, Development Plan and a Tentative Parcel
Map) - Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
1.1 Recommend to City Council, adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program based on the Initial Study, which was prepared pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072;
1.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-003
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0138, A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REALIGN THE
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (M) LAND-USE DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES
OF A 23 ACRE SITE; PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0139,
A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO)
AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO), AND THE STANDARDS
AND REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING
PDO DOCUMENT, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0140, A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION
AND OPERATION OF A 160 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX
AND EIGHT RETAIL I OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 68,700
SQUARE FEET, AND PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0152,
A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBDIVIDING 3 LOTS AND
CREATING 8 LOTS, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO(S). 944-290-012, 013,014.
Staff's presentation
By way of overheads, Assistant Planner Preisendanz provided an overview of the project plan
(per agenda material), relaying the following: 1) the proposal to amend the General Plan in
order to realign the current vertical designation to a more horizontal orientation which would
allow for the Commercial and Office portion of the property to be located along Rancho
California Road and the Medium Density to be located along the southerly portion of the project,
2) the proposal to amend the Zoning Map which would allow for a Planned Development
Overlay (PDO) and will provide the Development Standards and Design Guidelines for future
development, 3) the proposal to develop a 160-unit apartment complex with garages and
carports on the southern portion of the project site, and Commercial/Retail/Office buildings on
the northerly portion, and 4) to subdivide the site (three existing parcels) into eight parcels via a
Tentative Parcel Map with seven of these parcels being in the Commercial/Office area, and one
remaining in the Residential area.
Continuing his presentation, Assistant Planner Preisendanz relayed that staff has been working
with the applicant regarding this particular project for over two years, addressing land use
R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village of T emeculalCC Agenda Report.doc 19
compatibility (primarily with neighboring residents in the Starlight Ridge, The Villages, and the
Temecula Ridge Apartments) and buffering elements, advising that due to these issues of
concern, staff requested the applicant to submit a PDO which will require an increased setback
along the easterly portion of the property (25 feet), and require an additional setback along the
southerly portion of the property that abuts the apartments in Starlight Ridge (noting the
requirement for a 25-foot landscaped buffer), relaying that the closest building along the
southerly portion would 65 feet, the closest apartment building along the easterly portion would
be 45 feet, noting the requirement for enhanced landscaping to further the buffering of the
property from the adjacent homeowners; via maps, specified the area within the PDO where the
Commercial buildings would be required to be one story in order to lower the impact to the
adjacent homeowners to the east; relayed that within the PDO area, the apartment complexes
will be required to be kept at a two-story level maximum (with a 35-foot height limit); advised
that in order to provide land use compatibility through the PDO, staff is requiring the applicant
(in order to retain staff's recommendation for approval) to remove the gas station which is
proposed at the front entry of the project, noting that staff was of the opinion that this use would
be more vehicular-oriented rather than pedestrian-oriented; and concluded that it was staff's
opinion that this project plan would provide a better project than was originally designated under
the General Plan and zoning.
For Chairman Chiniaeff, via overheads, Assistant Planner Preisendanz provided additional
specification regarding the easterly edge of the property with respect to the relationship between
the height of the one building (which was at a distance of 45 feet) and the adjacent lots (Lot
Nos. 2, 5, and 6) in the Starlight Ridge development. Mr. Larry Markham, representing the
applicant, specifying how the height of this building would relate to the pad elevations of these
adjacent lots.
The applicant's presentation
Mr. Barton L. Buchalter, the applicant, thanked City staff for their efforts regarding this particular
proposal, noting that since approximately 199a this project has been through numerous
machinations; noted his willingness to continue working with staff, now the Planning
Commission, ultimately the City Council, as well as the surrounding residents, to make efforts to
ameliorate the concerns expressed; with respect to the fear expressed from various residents
regarding an increase in traffic and crime with the development of an apartment complex,
relayed that based on other projects that this particular company has developed in the
community, this project development would be an asset to the community; noted that this family
has a history of building the highest quality project feasible and maintaining ownership after the
project's completion; specified the allowable uses with the current zoning, and the vast
improvement with the current proposal; provided additional information regarding the
Commercial area; apprised the Planning Commission of the community meeting the applicant
held with the Portolino Apartment and Woodcreek Apartment communities (inviting 6aa
residents and/or families) to review the project plan, advising that during the four-hour event
only one negative comment was expressed whereby a resident noted a desire to exclude the
proposed gas station; with respect to the gas station use, noted the relative importance of this
use due to the associated economic viability of the project, clarifying that this use would be
restricted, as follows: no alcohol sold on the premises, limited hours, and high architectural
standards; and relayed that with these restrictions, the benefits of including this use in the
project would outweigh any detrimental impacts, additionally noting the lack of gas stations in
this area.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, presented the project plan; provided a brief
history of the property, the previous zoning, and the proposed PDO; noted the efforts of the
applicant to mitigate the impacts related to the view shed; relayed the benefit of being able to
R:ID P12000l00,0140 Village ofTemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc 20
eliminate left-turn movements into the Target Center (to enter the Mobil gas station), the Texaco
gas station, and the Shell station with the inclusion of the proposed gas station; introduced the
development team members who were available to answer questions; with respect to the letters
staff received today (dated February 13, 2002, and January 29,2002, from representatives of
the Starlight Ridge, Alta Vista, and The Villages Homeowners Associations), advised that the
applicant would address these comments in written detail prior to City Council presentation of
the project; and with respect to architectural design, noted that the applicant was open to
architectural comments from the Planning Commission.
The applicant addresses the PlanninQ Commission's Questions
For informational purposes, Commissioner Olhasso noted that for future projects, it would be
her preference that three- and four-story projects be developed in Temecula; with respect to this
particular project, recommended that the European-styled design of the retail area be carried
over to the apartment architecture; and recommended the inclusion of tot lots in the project plan.
For Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Markham provided information regarding the applicant's view of
what constitutes an "amenity," advising that it would be an element that enhanced the project
(I.e., a pool, a recreation room, an exercise room), creating a more attractive high quality
apartment complex which would be an asset to the community, noting the applicant's openness
for input from the Planning Commission regarding a definition for the term "amenity:' specified
the proposed access points in the project, additionally noting the pedestrian access points;
advised that the signage for the gas station would most likely be a low profile monument sign,
relaying that the applicant would be willing to come back to the Planning Commission for review
of the signage plan for the Commercial area, and in particular the gas station when a sign
program was developed.
Addressing Commissioner Mathewson's queries, Mr. Markham confirmed that the minimum
landscape setback requirement on the eastern portion of the project proximate to the
Commercial area was 25 feet, 45 feet on the eastern side proximate to the residential area, 65
feet on the south, and approximately 25 feet on Rancho California Road; specified the
pedestrian linkage from the Multi-family area to the Commercial area on the western portion of
the project, providing additional information regarding the design of this access which met ADA
requirements, confirming that while there was no pedestrian access route on the east side of the
access road, there was a possibility that a route could be incorporated into the slope, advising
that the project was designed to encourage all the pedestrian access on the western side.
For Commissioner Guerriero, the applicant's representative noted that the Portofino Project's
setback was approximately 15 feet (Commissioner Guerriero relaying that the Temecula Ridge
Development had a setback of approximately 120 feet), Mr. Markham advising that this
particular project's setback along Rancho California Road for the Commercial area was 25 feet
from the property line which constituted 31 feet of landscaped setback including the area behind
the sidewalk, additionally noting that there was also a slight grade difference.
For clarification, Mr. Buchalter noted that the property owner inherited certain elements included
in this project, and subsequently made revisions as staff directed, and time allowed; and in
response to Commissioner Olhasso's comments, advised that the applicant would not be
opposed to revising the design of the apartment complex, implementing a more contemporary
style.
For the Planning Commission's information, Senior Planner Hogan confirmed that a clear
definition of what constitutes an "amenity" has not yet been determined (as the term relates to
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\CC Agenda Report.doc
21
the Growth Management Plan), noting that both the Planning Commission and the City Council
have struggled with this term.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Vince Di Donato, landscape architect representing the
applicant, specified the various trees proposed which would provide varying heights, some
color, screening, and a softening effect on the wall, advising that when the trees mature the
building would nearly completely be screened; confirmed that the majority of the trees would be
24-inch box size, providing additional information regarding each species growth rate; and
advised that the applicant would not be opposed to increasing the size of a portion of the trees if
that was the desire of the Planning Commission.
The public is invited to comment
The following individuals spoke as proponents of the project:
" Mr. A. G. Kading
" Ms. Carolyn Fritchey
" Mr. Robert Oder
2000 Rancho California Road
42763 North Star Court
29911 Mira Loma Drive
The above-mentioned individuals were in favor of the project for the following reasons:
. The zone change was preferable.
. Impressed with this ultimate proposal, noting the changes the project has undergone.
. The proposed retail center will be a stabilizing influence for the Multi-family areas.
. In favor of the proposed service station if a high level of architectural design were to be
implemented.
. Noted that alternate projects this particular company has developed have been exemplary.
. Relayed a desire to obtain information regarding the uses in the retail center.
. Per comments relayed at a National Association of Homebuilders Conference, advised that
"amenities" were described as any element, which could assist in the improvement of the
lifestyle in an apartment (i.e., a gated complex).
. After attending an informational meeting regarding the project, noted that numerous
concerns were allayed, in particular the grading plan (which would lower the site), the
location, the design, the proposed permitted uses at the Commercial Center, the fact that
this property owner has a history of continuing ownership after development of projects, and
the owner's contention that he will continue with the ownership of this property, and the
proposed fencing.
. As an 1 a-year resident residing adjacent to this property, opined that it was an individual's
responsibility to obtain information regarding parcels surrounding one's residence, advising
that she had known for years that this property was planned to be a Commercial/Multi-family
development.
. Emphasized the importance of the rights of property owners to develop on their own land.
. Advised that the concerns of the residents residing proximate to the project site should be
addressed, if feasible.
. The benefits due to the shopping center with its pedestrian links.
. The need for apartments in Temecula, and the probable decrease in rental prices as the
demand is met.
For informational purposes, Mr. Oder noted his concurrence with Commissioner Olhasso's
comments regarding the recommendation for future apartment projects to be taller, and fewer to
be of the traditional box-shaped design.
The following individuals expressed oppOSition to the project:
R:\D P\2000\OO,0140 Village ofTemecula\CC Agenda Report.doc
22
" Mr. David Boucher 42797 Twilight Court
" Mr. Scott Hanson 42298 Cosmic Drive
" Ms. Marli Calabrese 42059 Cosmic Drive
" Ms. Laura Hanson 42298 Cosmic Drive
" Mr. Thomas Chisham 42422 Agena Street
The above-mentioned individuals were opposed to the project for the following reasons:
. Concerned regarding air quality and noise impacts associated with this project.
. Desired a greater buffer between the project and the surrounding areas.
. Opposed to the proposed gas station.
. Concerned regarding the view of the parking lot from the street.
. Expressed a preference for the development of professional offices rather than retail uses.
. Decreased property values.
. Noted a preference for the development of condominiums in lieu of apartments, in particular,
at the top portion of the project.
. The natural rural character of the community would be decreased with implementation of
this project.
. Recommended that there be more of a transitional project (i.e., office buildings) developed
and not a major commercial center.
. Read a letter (which was submitted to staff) written by Ms. Debra Moreno who could not
attend this hearing but had concerns regarding the project, the letter including comments
previously expressed, as well as a concern regarding traffic impacts.
. Inadequate access points for children traveling to school.
In response to Mr. Boucher's comments regarding the negative impacts this project would have
on his view shed, Chairman Chiniaeff noted that if this property was graded flat, a single-family
home would be proximately the same ultimate height as this multi-family unit with the proposed
grading plan. In response, Mr. Boucher additionally noted his preference for multi-family units
for ownership, and not as rentals.
For Chairman Chiniaeff, Mr. Scott Hanson noted that his residence did not back directly
adjacent to the project, reiterating his concern regarding noise impacts.
For the record, Chairman Chiniaeff noted the Planning Commission's receipt of two letters,
which staff received today, February 20, 2002 (dated February 13, 2002, and January 29, 2002,
from representatives of the Starlight Ridge, Alta Vista, and The Villages Homeowners
Associations), which were previously referenced by Mr. Markham. It is additionally noted for the
record that a petitiori with 27 signatures attached to the letter of February 13, 2002 (which
outlined concerns regarding the project) was submitted to staff, as well as the letter from Ms.
Moreno, which was read into the record during the public comment period.
The applicant's rebuttal
Mr. Markham further addressed the following issues:
o Concurred that this project would have no greater impact regarding the view shed than
would a single-family home, which Chairman Chiniaeff had explained earlier.
o Relayed that the setbacks had been increased at the direction of staff (between the time of
last year's and this year's community meetings).
R:ID P\2000l00,0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
23
o Provided additional information regarding the PDO, which is a zoning document; and noted
that the least intensive commercial area was located proximate to the single-family homes
(in Sub-area A).
o With respect to concern raised regarding the maintenance of the property since it was for
rental occupants and not for ownership, specified the alternate projects in the community
that this company owns and maintains.
o Relayed that the project was conditioned to design and construct a signal, which would
additionally assist the Portofino residents.
o Advised that it was likely that the primary cause of the noise impact that residents are
experiencing was derived from the traffic onramps on Rancho California Road and would
not be as a result of this project, noting that Mr. Dodson could further address this issue.
o Noted that the project was conditioned to build an a-foot high wrought iron fence along the
property line, which will be consistent with the fencing along the Kading property, relaying
that this fencing would aid in addressing various concerns of the surrounding residents.
o In response to Commissioner Mathewson's queries, provided additional information
regarding the development of condominiums and the associated construction liability issues.
Mr. Buchalter provided the following information:
o Clarified that this property was purchased due to the existing Multi-family zoning, specifying
the efforts to make numerous improvements in the project plan.
o With respect to the ownership vs. rental issue, specified that this particular company solely
develops rental projects (i.e., high-end apartment complexes), additionally noting the
success of the Ryland Development, which was located adjacent to the Portofino Apartment
complex.
o In response to Commissioner Olhasso, noted that the project will have high-speed
connectivity (i.e., fiber, Digital Subscriber Line.)
With respect to traffic issues, Mr. Bob Davis, traffic engineer representing the applicant, noted
the following:
o Provided additional information regarding the location of the proposed signal (Director of
Public Works Hughes noting that the distance from Cosmic Drive to this location was
approximately 740 feet).
o Confirmed, for Chairman Chiniaeff, that the uses allowed per the existing General Plan
would have generated more trips than will be generated by this particular project, noting that
with Professional Office uses there would have been a greater impact during peak periods.
o Relayed that a conservative discount of trips was factored into the data for the anticipated
internal trips between the Residential and the Commercial areas; and for Commissioner
Telesio, provided additional information regarding the relationship between particular types
of permitted uses and the associated impact with respect to an anticipated reduction in trips.
The Commission deliberates
For informational purposes, Commissioner Olhasso noted that with respect to letters from the
public for Planning Commission consideration, that if the information is received on the day of
the hearing (as were the two letters referenced at this particular meeting) there was inadequate
time for the Planning Commission to thoroughly review the comments, recommending that
information be submitted at an earlier date.
Noting that Starlight Ridge was one of her favorite communities, Commissioner Olhasso
thanked the residents who attended this hearing in order to express their comments to the
Planning Commission; with respect to the remarks noted regarding a preference for the
RID P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc 24
development of condominiums vs. apartments, relayed that from a crime prevention standpoint,
apartments were more easily policed due to the single ownership; and with respect to this
particular project expressed the following recommendations:
That this project be conditioned to participate in the Crime Free Multi-Housing Program;
That the trees proposed to be installed adjacent to the residential area be increased in
size;
That this project be conditioned to have staff investigate park amenities, specifically
considering inclusion of a tot lot; and
That the architectural design on the apartment complex be brought back to the Planning
Commission for review prior to construction.
After echoing Commissioner Olhasso's comments, in particular that the zoning for this area had
been identified and the residents could have obtained information regarding the future
development of this property located adjacent to the residential area, Commissioner Telesio
expressed the following recommendations regarding the proposed project:
Concurred that the design of the apartments should come back to the Planning
Commission for review, noting hopes of the architectural style being consistent with the
proposed design of the Commercial area; and
With respect to the proposed gas station use, relayed that he could support the inclusion of
this use at the proposed location subject to the landscaping plan being adequate, and the
signage subdued, recommending that this use also be brought back to the Planning
Commission for approval of the specific plans;
Addressing the proposed plan, Commissioner Mathewson relayed the following
recommendations:
With respect to the proposed gas service station, relayed his opposition to inclusion of this
use, noting that the negative impacts could not be adequately mitigated;
With respect to the architectural design of the Commercial area, advised that he was
impressed with the proposal;
Regarding the permitted uses in the Commercial area, noted concern regarding adequate
parking provisions if the uses were high attractors (i.e., the Trader Joe's use located on
Winchester Road);
Recommended that there be an additional pedestrian linkage incorporated on the eastern
side of the project accessing the Commercial area (to be located down the slope face from
the apartment pad level to the Commercial pad level); and
With respect to the amenities issue, as it relates to the Growth Management Plan (GMP),
recommended that there be investigation pursued regarding implementing a trails system
to and from this site, if feasible, noting that if this system was not feasible that there be
consideration for imposing an additional fee, an amenity fee, to be deposited into a fund to
be used for recreation facilities in the community; and opined that on-site amenities did not
fulfill the GMP requirements due to not benefiting the community, as a whole.
With respect to this particular proposal, Commissioner Guerriero noted the following
recommendations:
Advised that he was strongly opposed to the inclusion of the gas station due to traffic and
environmental impacts;
With respect to the proposed signal, noted his opposition to locating a signal in this area in
light of the existing five signals, recommending that an alternate plan be investigated;
With respect to setbacks, recommended that there be efforts to increase the 25-foot
setback;
With respect to community amenities, relayed that it appeared that this project was not
proposing any amenities which would benefit the community, as a whole;
RID P\2000100-0140 Village ofTemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
25
Recommended that a certain portion of the apartments be allocated for low-
income/affordable housing;
Queried why patio homes could not be incorporated into the proposal, noting the plethora
of apartments in the area; and
With respect to the negative view shed impacts, concurred with the resident's comments,
recommending that there be the elimination of one story of the building in the area where
the residential views would be negatively impacted.
Chairman Chiniaeff made the following recommendations regarding this particular project:
With respect to the apartment complex elevations, concurred with the need for
improvement, noting that to create consistency with the architectural style proposed for the
Commercial area would be appropriate; and
With respect to the landscaped setbacks, recommended that proximate to Sub-area A
(along the eastern portion of the project), that this setback be increased in order to screen
the project from the houses located in this area.
Commentino on the permitted uses in Areas A. B. and C. the Plan nino Commission made the
followino recommendations for the Citv Council's consideration:
That Animal hospitals be deleted;
That Appliance sales and repairs not be permitted in Areas A or B;
That aerobics/dancelgymnasticsljazzerciselmartial arts studios solely be permitted in Area
B via a CUP;
That Automotive parts sales be removed as a permitted use in Areas A and B;
That Bowling alley be deleted;
That Community care facilities and Congregate care be deleted;
That Furniture sales be deleted;
That Garden supplies and equipment sales and service be deleted;
That Grocery story, retail and specialty be permitted solely by CUP in Area B and that the
size of the use be limited to less than 10,000 square feet.
That Health and exercise clubs be solely permitted in Area B via a CUP;
That Laboratories, film, medical (deleting research or testing) be added as a permitted use
in Area B;
That Nursing Homes be deleted;
That Private utility be deleted;
That Parcel delivery services be deleted;
That Senior citizen housing be deleted;
That with respect to Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales that there be a restriction
prohibiting outside storage;
That Temporary Real Estate tract offices be deleted; and
That Wedding Chapels be deleted.
With respect to the gas station use, Chairman Chiniaeff noted his support of the inclusion of this
use, subject to the use being well-screened, and with exemplary architectural design, advising
that he would visit the gas station located in the Dana Point area, which had been referenced by
the applicant as an example of what would be proposed at this site; and with respect to the
overall project plan, concurred with Commissioner Mathewson's concept regarding imposing an
amenity fee as a recommendation for the City Council's consideration.
For Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Markham and Mr. Kading specified the off-site installments
proposed with the T emecula Ridge Project in order to offset the GMP's requirements for
amenities.
R:\D P\2000\OQ,Q140 Village of Temecula\CC Agenda Report.doc
26
In response to Chairman Chiniaeff, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the signal
would be installed in conjunction with the project's development, advising that staff would not
want the signal installed until it was warranted, noting that the timing of the installation would be
affected by the project's phasing; and confirmed that if the Commercial area was proposed in
Phase I of development, that the signal would be installed at that time.
In light of Commissioner Mathewson's comments, Commissioner Olhasso queried whether this
project was conditioned for park mitigation fees to pay for active fields in the City. In response,
Senior Planner Hogan advised that there was imposition of a Development Impact Fee
component for park and recreational amenities, as well as the project being subjected to the
Quimby Act requirements. For clarification, Commissioner Mathewson noted that his
recommendation was for a fee over and above the typical requirements in order to address the
GMP amenities issue.
With respect to monument signage, Commissioner Mathewson recommended that corporate
logos be avoided (which has resulted in a mish-mash of signage at alternate sites, with no
consistency with respect to design); recommended that the design of the monument sign age be
exemplary. In response, Mr. Markham relayed that the applicant could bring the sign program
before the Planning Commission, when developed, while noting that wood signage (which was
recommended by Commissioner Mathewson) degrades rapidly. Commissioner Mathewson
advised that he would provide staff with photographs of pleasing signage in order for the
applicant to pursue similar design concepts.
In response to Chairman Chiniaeff, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that the Planning
Commission might desire to take action on the General Plan Amendment recommendation
separately, relaying the vote ratio necessary for approval of this particular component.
The Planning Commission opted to take action separately on the various components of this
proposed project, approving the associated documents, including Resolution No. PC 2002-003
(as amended), as follows:
MOTION: Chairman Chiniaeff moved to approve inclusion of the gas station use in the project
subject to the following revisions:
Add-
That the design plan be brought back to the Planning Commission for review;
That the hours of operation would be limited;
That alcohol sales be prohibited,
That the signage plan be brought back to the Planning Commission for review; and
That the reference in the associated approving documents be revised to delete
denial of the gas station use (as had been recommended by staff).
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio. (Ultimately this motion passed; see
page 15.)
Commissioner Mathewson relayed that he still had concerns regarding the lighting impacts, and
the potential for signage to be placed on the canopy of the gas station use. Chairman Chiniaeff
RID P12000l00,0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
27
noted that during the design review the Planning Commission could deny approval of the plan if
it was not satisfactory.
At this time voice vote was taken, reflecting approval of the motion with the exception of
Commissioners Guerriero and Mathewson who voted no.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the General Plan Amendment (PAOO-
0138). The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved approve the Zoning Map Amendment (PAOO-
0139); and to adopt the PDO document subject to the previously noted recommendations and
removal of any references to plastic channel lettering on signage, ergo restricting this particular
use on signage. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
For Director of Planning Ubnoske, Chairman Chiniaeff clarified that it was not the Planning
Commission's desire to have the applicant bring back the redesign of the architectural plan for
the apartments prior to City Council approval, advising that it would be the Planning
Commission's recommendation that the project be approved in conceptual form by the City
Council, and be subject to Planning Commission approval of the design plan prior to
construction.
For Commissioner Olhasso. Commissioner Guerriero relayed that it was his desire that the
signal be eliminated and that either left-turn movements in and out be restricted, or that an
alternative be discussed with the Kading Project representatives, relaying that both projects
could be accessed onto Moraga Road; and advised that in his opinion a community amenity
would be attained if the signal was eliminated and the Kading's project's access was shared.
Director of Public Works Hughes advised that if the Planning Commission was considering
approval of the project without the signal, that staff had not analyzed the impacts associated
with this recommendation (i.e., the U-turn motions created), relaying that from a stacking impact
standpoint, there would need to be off-site improvements to mitigate the added U-turn
movements; advised that while staff would support the elimination of any signals, if feasible, that
this project had not been analyzed without the installation; noted alternatives that while could be
considered, would cause impacts that would need to be mitigated; for Commissioner Telesio,
relayed that the signal may, or may not, be warranted at the first of occupancy; for
Commissioner Guerriero, provided additional information regarding the need to analyze the
project if the signal was not included; and with regard to the existing signals on Rancho
California Road, confirmed that the phasing was not synchronized due to the varying capacities
on this particular street, advising that at as future point, the signals would be synchronized.
MOTION: Chairman Chiniaeff moved to approve the construction of the Multi-family Residential
units and Retail/Office buildings (PAOO-0140) subject to the following revisions:
Add-
That the conditions added regarding the gas station use (as noted in the first
motion) be imposed.
That the architectural design of the apartments be brought back to the Planning
Commission for review with a style consistent with the Commercial area.
RID P\2000100,0140 Village ofTemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
28
That the building (i.e., Building No.3), which was proximate to the Starlight Ridge
Development, and the building proximate to Lot Nos. 36 and 37 (which needs to be
decreased in height on the back side) be re-designed to reduce the negative view
shed impacts.
That the inclusion of a tot lot be investigated by staff, and included in the project
plan, if determined appropriate by staff.
Recommendation that the City Council consider imposing a separate amenity fee to
satisfy the GMP requirements for amenities (Assistant City Attorney Curley relaying
that staff would investigate the feasibility of this recommendation) since the
Planning Commission cannot determine the City Council's definition of a qualifying
community amenity.
That the project be subject to participate in the Crime Free Multi-Housing Program.
That the trees on the eastern portion of the project be increased in size.
That there be a walkway installed for pedestrian access on the easterly portion of
the project. (Mr. Markham noting that a driveway could be added on the eastern
portion in order for pedestrians to avoid the existing necessity to cross, and could
instead be directed to the sidewalk.)
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Commissioner Guerriero and Mathewson who voted no.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Tentative Parcel Map (PAOO-0152).
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to close the public hearing: and to adopt the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\CC Agenda Report.doc
29
ATTACHMENT NO.7
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AND EXHIBITS
RID P\2000l00-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report.doc
30
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
February 20, 2002
Planning Application No(s). PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
Prepared By: Don Hazen, Senior Planner
1. RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL. ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program based on the Initial Study, which was prepared pursuant to
CEOA Guidelines Section 15072.
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0138, A GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT TO REALIGN THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO)
AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) LAND-USE
DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES OF A 23 ACRE SITE; PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0139, A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (M) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
(PDO), AND THE STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS CONTAINED
IN THE ACCOMPANYING PDO DOCUMENT, PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0140, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 160 UNIT
APARTMENT COMPLEX AND EIGHT RETAIL I OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 68,700 SQUARE FEET, AND PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0152, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP RE-
SUBDIVIDING THE SITE FROM 3 LOTS INTO 8 LOTS,
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA
ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN
AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012, 013,014.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
The MJW Property Group, Barton L. Buchalter
PROPOSAL:
PAOO-0138: General Plan Amendment to realign the
Professional Office (PO) and Medium Density Residential
(M) land-use designation boundaries, and increasing the
gross acreage of the Residential area by 5.03 acres, with a
corresponding decrease in the Professional Office area.
PAOO-0139: A Zoning Map Amendment from Professional
Office (PO) Medium Density Residential (M) to Planned
RID P\2000100,0140 Village of TemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc
t
Development Overlay (PDO) and adoption of the standards
and regulations contained in the PDO document.
PAOO-0140: Construct 160 multi-family residential units on
approximately 15.26 acres and nine (9) retail/office buildings
totaling approximately 71,100 square feet on 7.71 acres.
P AOO-0152: A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the site into
eight parcels.
LOCATION: South side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road
and east of the Rancho California Road I Moraga Road
Intersection
EXISTING ZONING: Medium Density and Professional Office
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: High Density
South: Low Medium
East: Low Medium
West: Medium Density
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density and Professional Office
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Portofino Apartments (16.5 du/ac)
South: Starlight Ridge Residential Tract (4.82 du/ac)
East: Starlight Ridge Residential Tract (included)
West: Vacant; approved apartments (11.8 du/ac)
BACKGROUND
March 03, 2000
March 30, 2000
May 1, 2000
May 5, 2000
May 25, 2000
June a, 2000
September 21, 2000
February a, 2001
June 5, 2001
July 5, 2001
January 14, 2002
Project submitted
Project deemed incomplete
First Development Review Committee (DRC)
Project deemed incomplete
Second DRC
Deemed incomplete
Third DRC
First Community Meeting
Received resubmittal from third DRC comments.
Project deemed complete
Second Community Meeting
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Environmental Determination
The following technical reports were submitted with the application as reference documents for
the environmental review:
. 1999 Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey, 45-Day Letter Report, Rancho California Road
Project (Merkel & Associates, Inc., June 10, 1999)
R:\D P\2000\QO.0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and CQAs.doc
2
. Kading/Rancho California Road City of Temecula Biological Constraints Report (Merkel &
Associates, Inc., June 4, 1999)
. Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Temecula VillagelTemecula Ridge Development
Temecula, California (Wilbur Smith Associates, August 2a, 2000)
. Drainage/Hydrology Study for Tentative Parcel Map No. 29140 Village Commercial and
Apartments
. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment -Temecula Ridge (PA99-0371)(Jean A. Keller)
. Preliminary Noise Analysis for Temecula Ridge (Mestre Greve Associates, February 2000)
. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential/Commercial Development City of
Temecula (CHJ, Inc., June 8, 1999)
Staff has prepared an Initial Study and determined that the project could potentially result in
significant environmental impacts, unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of
approval. Based on those findings, staff has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring Plan as summarized below, will satisfactorily comply with the
regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Villages of Temecula EnvironmentallmpactlMitigation Summary
Impact Mitigation Measures Time Frame Responsible Party
Biological
Resources
Potential removal of The project developer shall Prior to the Department of Public
California acquire compensatory Issuance of a Works and the
gnatcatcher, mitigation acreage off the grading permit Planning Department
Quino checkers pot project site as discussed with
butterfly, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Stephen's kangaroo Service.
rat habitat
Hazards and
Hazardous materials
Create a significant Provide the City with a Prior to the Riverside County Fire
hazard to the public or Business Plan that outlines issuance of a County Fire
the environment the management of building Department, Building
through routine hazardous materials. permit. and Safety
transportation, use, or Department, Public
disposal of petroleum Works Department
materials such as and Planning
. aasoline and oil. Department
Cultural Resources
Potentially cause a During initial grading and Prior to the Department of Public
substantial adverse ground disturbance activities, issuance of a Works and Planning
change in the a qualified cultural resources building permit Department
significance of an monitor (and Pechanga rep.)
archaeological shall be present and shall
resource pursuant to have the authority to stop and
Section 1506.5 redirect ground disturbance
activities to evaluate the
significance of any cultural
resources exposed.
R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village ofTemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
]
Could directly or During excavation and Prior to the Department of Public
indirectly destroy a hillside cutting activities, a issuance of a Works and Planning
unique paleotolgical qualified paleontological grading permit Department
resource or site or monitor shall be present and
unique geological shall have the authority to
featu re stop and redirect grading
activities to evaluate the
significance of any
paleontolgical resources
exposed during the grading
activity.
Disturb any human If any human remains are During any Department of Public
remains, including encountered during initial ground Works And Planning
those interred outside grading activities, all ground disturbance Department
of formal cemeteries disturbing activities in the and prior to
vicinity of the discovery shall the issuance
be terminated immediately of a building
and the County's Coroner's permit.
office shall be contacted to
manaQe such remains.
General Plan Amendment
The applicant requests a General Plan amendment to realign the Professional Office (PO) and
Medium Density Residential (M) land use plan boundaries from a vertical alignment to horizontal.
This will result in office/retail uses on the northerly portion of the site along Rancho California
Road, and the residential use on the southerly "uphill" portion of the lot furthest from the street.
The amendment will also have a net effect of increasing the residential acreage by 5.03 acres.
Because General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes require City Council approval, the
Planning Commission will be reviewing the entire project proposal and making a
recommendation to the City Council for final action.
Zone Change
The applicant proposes to change the zoning designation of the site from PO and M to Planned
Development Overlay (PDO). Chapter 17.22 of the Development Code specifies the procedures
and land use flexibility that is possible with a PDO designation. In this case, the applicant desires
a PDO zone in order to broaden the range of retail uses than would otherwise be permitted with
the current PO zoning designation; and to create parcels that do not have frontage on public
streets and/or cannot "stand alone" with respect to parking/access and approval. The applicant
has also submitted an accompanying PDO document that contains development standards, a
use matrix, and architectural design standards that supercede the Development Code.
Development Plan
The applicant requests Development Plan approval for nine (10) office/retail buildings and 160
apartment units on the site. If approved, this would require no further design review of the
individual buildings prior to submittal of a building permit application, except for Pads C (service
station), D (restaurant), and E (daycare), which will require subsequent architectural review as
Development Plan applications, because the applicant wishes to defer designing the buildings
until actual tenants are known. Following is a proposed land use summary for the site:
R\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
4
BUILDINGS PLANNING AREA PROPOSED USE SQUARE FOOTAGE
PAD "A" Sub Area B Retail 6,000 SF
PAD"B" Sub Area B Retail 11,100 SF
PAD"C" Sub Area B Service Station 2,400 SF
PAD"D" Sub Area B Restaurant 6,000 SF
PAD"E" Sub Area B Davcare 9,600 SF
PAD"F" Sub Area B Two-storv Office 20,000 SF
PAD"G" Sub Area A Office 4,500 SF
PAD"H" Sub Area A Office 6,000 SF
PAD "I" Sub Area A Office 5,500 SF
(10) two-story Sub-Area C 160 Apartment Units, 700-1151 sq.ft.
residential buildings 80-1 bdr./aO-2bdr.
containing 16-units
ea.
Office/Retail Plan
The office/retail portion of the site will be located along the Rancho California Road frontage and
extend southward, approximately 260-400 feet. The site will be graded so that the office/retail
portion of the site is generally level with Rancho California Road (+/- 2 feet). The plan shows the
offices to be located along the southeast and easterly portions of the site (adjacent to Starlight
Ridge subdivision). The retail buildings will be located along the street frontage and the westerly
portion of the site. All buildings along the perimeter will have a minimum 25-foot landscaped
setback from the property lines.
Residential Plan
The residential development of the site will consist of 160 "stacked" apartment units located in
ten (10) two-story buildings. The site will be graded so that the building pads are approximately
45 feet above the office/retail grade, and 20 feet below the pad elevations of the adjacent homes
on the uphill slope to the east and rear. The rooftop-to-rooftop grade difference between the
apartment buildings and the adjacent homes will be approximately the same if the adjacent
homes are single-story; and the apartment roofs will be approximately 5-8 feet lower if the
adjacent homes are two-story.
The nearest apartment buildings to the adjacent residences will be set back a minimum 45-feet
from the east property line; 65-feet from the rear property line; and 52-feet from the private
access street along the west property line. Detached carports and uncovered parking will be
sited in proximity to the units they are intended to serve. The B-4 unit type will have lower level
garages with units above. A pool and clubhouse will be located in the interior courtyard as
project amenities.
Architecture
The application includes a Development Plan for all proposed buildings, except for Pads C, D,
and E. The architectural style of the buildings can be described as "Eclectic Mediterranean",
which is characterized by clay tile roofs, arches, heavy use of stucco, and flat cornice parapets.
The commercial buildings will also incorporate canvas awnings and wood trellises as accent
treatment. Each retail/office building will have custom tower elements as distinguishing features.
The residential buildings will have a complementary architectural style, but have a distinctive
"look" that is different from the commercial development. The colors and materials proposed for
the development will consist of earth tones similar to colors used throughout Temecula and
typical for the architectural styles.
R:IO P\2000100-0140 Village ofTemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
5
Landscaping
All exposed graded surfaces and setbacks will be landscaped with a combination of trees and
shrubs. Trees planted along Rancho California Road will include a condition for 24-inch box
London Plane (Condition #7). The setback areas along the easterly and westerly portions of the
site will include rows of 15-gallon Pepper Trees. The graded slope between the commercial site
and the residential site will be planted with Peppers, Mondell Pine, Chinese Flame trees, and
assorted shrubbery. The slope will be approximately aO-feet in depth and 40 feet high. The rear
of the site will have similar landscaping and include an a-foot high tubular steel "view fence"
along the perimeter. A large portion of the rear of the site at the southwesterly corner will remain
in its natural state with native vegetation.
Access and Circulation
Three (3) access points to the project will be provided. The primary access (which will be 740
lineal feet west of the center line of Cosmic Drive, and opposite the intersection across the
street) will be signalized. The remaining two access points will be "right-in", "right-out"
unsignalized driveways located to the east and west of the primary entrance. An internal drive
will extend uphill to the residential project and terminate as a circular loop. For the most part,
internal circulation through the residential project will consist of loop drives, with parking
accessed directly off of those drives.
Tentative Parcel Map
The Tentative Parcel Map application proposes to create the following eight (a) parcels out of three
(3) existing parcels:
Parcel 1
Parcel 2
Parcel 3
Parcel 4
Parcel 5
Parcel 6
Parcel 7
Parcel a
0.93 acres
1.a3 acres
0.99 acres
1.35 acres
0.7a acres
O.a6 acres
0.97 acres
15.25 acres
(Office)
(Office)
(Day Care)
(Restaurant)
(Gas Station)
(Retail)
(Retail)
(Apartments)
ANALYSIS
1. Environmental Determination
Staff has conducted an environmental assessment of the project in accordance with CEQA, and
determined that no significant environmental impacts will occur if properly mitigated. Therefore, staff
recommends that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan be adopted for
the project. The mitigation measures have been included in the Exhibit A, Conditions of Approval.
2. General Plan Amendment
The request to re-align the Professional Office and Medium Density Residential land use
boundary is logical from a land use compatibility standpoint. The current General Plan land use
map shows the Professional Office designation extending from Rancho California Road to the
rear of the site for the westerly half of the site; and the Medium Density Residential designation
extending the full depth of the lot on the easterly half of the site.
By realigning the land use boundaries in a "horizontal" fashion, the commercial uses are located
R\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
6
along Rancho California Road and the residential use is located on the rear half of the site,
which serves as a buffer use between the commercial uses and the adjacent Low-Medium
residential density to the rear and easterly portion of the site. Additionally, developing the site
according to its current land use map configuration would likely create the need to level the
entire site to avoid split-level development projects extending the full depth of the lot and causing
handicap accessibilify problems.
At the first community meeting, there was some public concern expressed about the type of
residential use and density being proposed. The General Plan states that the Medium Densify
designation is intended for "attached and detached residential development. Typical housing
types may include single family zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, townhouses, and multi-
family garden apartments" (Land Use Element, pg. 2-24). Staff supports the proposed use,
because it provides an opportunify to diversify the housing stock and help meet the City's long-
term housing needs.
The density range specified by the General Plan for the Medium Density designation is 7-12
du/ac. The application proposes 160 units, which equates to 10.48 du/ac. While the City Council
Growth Management policies encourage housing projects to develop at the lower end of the
densify range, the traffic analysis indicates that the total peak hour traffic for the site will actually
be reduced with the proposed zone change. The Traffic Engineer determined that the plan to
increase the retail intensify of the site is actually more beneficial than office uses, from a peak-
hour traffic standpoint. Therefore, staff can support the proposed density because the concern
about traffic has been satisfactorily addressed.
3. Zone Change
The request for a PDO zoning designation will permit flexibility in the development of the site.
The primary benefit for the applicant is it will allow a broader range of retail uses than would
otherwise be permitted with the current PO designation. Staff is concerned that an excessive
amount or intensify of retail use would be inconsistent with the intent of the Professional Office
General Plan designation, and that issues of neighborhood compatibilify would arise.
Staff supports the proposed mix of retail and office uses being proposed in the PDO document,
however the inclusion of a service station increases the vehicle-orientated retail intensity of the
site, which staff believes is not compatible with the residential character of the surrounding area.
Staff has discussed this issue with the applicant, and the applicant has advised staff that he
wishes to proceed to public hearing with the plan as proposed.
The intent of the City's Growth Management policy is to discourage zone changes that will result
in higher traffic levels. The City Traffic Engineer has analyzed the projected traffic impacts
resulting from the proposed mix of uses permitted by the PDO, and has determined that the
project would generate approximately 1,455 fewer daily trips and 78 fewer PM peak hour trips
then is projected for uses with the current zoning designation.
4. Development Plan
a. Site Plan
The project conforms to the requirements of the Cify of Temecula's Development Code,
Design Guidelines, and intent of the General Plan. The project proposes a village design
concept, which will provide a pedestrian-scale commercial project (with the elimination of
the service station), and will provide pedestrian access from the apartment complex to
the commercial center. The orientation of the buildings will also allow for various
pedestrian amenities between buildings, as well as serve to minimizing the potential for
monotonous views of buildings from adjacent vantage points.
RIO P\2000100,0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
7
The residential project complies with the development standards for multiple-family
projects. The building orientation, building separation, open space, and recreational
amenities planned for the project will enhance the livability of the project.
The grading plan, landscaping, and building placement will also help create view
corridors to reduce the visual impact of the site. It should be acknowledged that there
would be view impacts regardless of whether the application is approved. The applicant
proposes lowering the grade of the southerly rear of the site in order to reduce the height
of the residential units-but not to the extent that neighbors are looking down on an
entire site of roofs.
b. Architecture
The proposed architectural styles for each building conform to the City's Design
Guidelines and will be compatible with the architectural character of the surrounding
area. The project proposes the use of various architectural elements designed to break
up the building mass. Techniques such as varying the roof planes, introducing unique
elements to each building, and varying the color and materials will help to create "visual
interest" in the site. Staff concurs with the basic design guidelines outlined in the PDO
document and recommends approval of the building designs.
c. Landscaping
The project effectively utilizes landscaping to buffer the adjacent land uses and visually
"soften" the appearance of the structures and parking lot. The plan will continue the
landscape design theme along the Rancho California Road frontage, particularly by
using the London Plane Tree. The overall percentage of site landscaping is 3a% of the
total site area-or more specifically, 30% coverage for the commercial area (which
exceeds the minimum required 25% for the PO district); and 38% for the residential site
(17% exclusive of the slope area). There is no minimum requirement for landscape
coverage in the M zoning district, but there is a minimum open space standard.
Landscaping will also be an integral part of the open space area for the residential
project. The Medium Density Residential zone requires 25% of the site area to be open
space. The plan provides approximately 25% open space, excluding the major slope
portions of the site.
d. Access and Circulation
Staff has reviewed the access and circulation of the proposed project and finds that the
proposed project will meet the requirements set forth in the City of Temecula's
Development Code. The proposed access points off of Rancho California Road have
minimized the effect of traffic conditions by providing "right-in" and "right out" driveways at
two locations, and a signalized intersection at the primary entry. The City of Temecula's
Traffic Engineer has reviewed the access and circulation plan for the project and
supports the proposed design as conditioned.
5. Tentative Parcel Map
The tentative parcel map proposes to subdivide three lots into eight lots. The residential area will
be on one lot, and the commercial development will be on seven other lots. The tentative map
conforms with the intent of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. A condition to establish reciprocal
access and parking easements across all lots will ensure that the site functions as one
integrated project. Because the commercial site will be developed over multiple parcels, staff
R\D P\2000\OO-0140 Vi11age of Temecula\Staff Report and CQAs.doc
8
has added a condition (Condition #16) requiring the formation of a Property Owner's Association
to provide for maintenance of the landscaping and hardscape surfaces throughout the
commercial site.
CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION
Staff has concerns about the neighborhood compatibility of the proposed office/retail portion of the
plan if a service station is approved. Since state law prohibits placing conditions on zone changes,
staff recommends that the applicant be required to delete all references to service stations before
the application is approved. With that change, staff can make the necessary findings for project
approval. All other aspects of the proposal are consistent with the General Plan land use policies
and staff recommends approval with the attached conditions and environmental mitigation
measures. The Planning Commission will need to forward its recommendation to the City Council for
final action.
FINDINGS:
General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes are "legislative acts" and do not require specific
findings to be made, other than the changes will be consistent with other portions of the General
Plan.
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed uses are in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances. The plan to develop an office/retail center
and 160 apartment units is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Office
Professional and Medium Density Residential for the site, provided the service station is
deleted from the plan. A service station at this location would introduce a vehicle-oriented
use that is not compatible with the residential character of the surrounding area.
2. The overall development of the land as conditioned, is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare. The development plan for the site is consistent
with the City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable sections of the
Development Code and related Planned Development Overlay document. Provisions have
been made to minimize the visual impact of the project, and all phases of construction will be
inspected to ensure compliance with the applicable building and fire codes.
Tentative Parcel Map (Section 16.09.140)
1. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. Each lot will conform to the
minimum lot size requirement of the original zoning district, and as permitted by the Planned
Development Overlay zone, may have parcels with access across other parcels created on
the same site. Conditions of approval will ensure that the common-use facilities such as
parking, sidewalks, and landscaping are maintained by a Property Owner's Association.
2. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into
pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965
3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by
the tentative map. Based on environmental documents submitted with the application and an
Initial Study which was prepared by staff in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act, it has been determined that the site is physically suitable for the type and density
of development being proposed. Conditions of approval have been added to ensure that
RID P\2000l00,0140 Village ofTemecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
9
final soils reports are submitted with the construction plans.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval,
are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat. Based on the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared which will provide conditions and
requirements to reduce the impacts of the project to a less than significant level. City staff
will ensure compliance of the mitigation measures as provided in the Monitoring Plan.
5. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health problems. All phases of construction will be inspected by appropriate
City staff to ensure compliance with all construction and fire codes.
6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project has been conditioned to
comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy
conservation.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements
acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to
those previously acquired by the public will be provided. As conditioned, the project will be
required to provide access easements across each lot to provide for parking and on-site
circulation.
8. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby).
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution No. 02-_ - Blue Page 11
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 16
2. Exhibits - Blue Page 34
A Vicinity map
B General Plan map
C Zoning map
D Initial Study / Mitigation Monitoring Plan
E Site plan
F-H Grading plans
I Tentative Parcel Map
J Landscape plans
K-O Commercial floor plans / elevations
P Clubhouse floor plan
Q Clubhouse elevations
R-ee Apartment floor plans/elevations
ff PDO document
R\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs,doc
10
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 02-_
R:ID P\2000l00,0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
II
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0138, A GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT TO REALIGN THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO)
AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) LAND-USE
DESIGNATION BOUNDARIES OF A 23 ACRE SITE; PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0139, A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (M) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
(PDO), AND THE STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS CONTAINED
IN THE ACCOMPANYING PDO DOCUMENT, PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0140, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 160 UNIT
APARTMENT COMPLEX AND EIGHT RETAIL I OFFICE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 68,700 SQUARE FEET, AND PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0152, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBDIVIDING 3 LOTS AND CREATING 8 LOTS, GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF
COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012, 013,014.
WHEREAS, MJW Property Group, filed Planning Application No(s). PAOO-013a General
Plan Amendment, PAOO-0139 Change of Zone (Planned Development Overlay), PAOO-0152
Tentative Parcel Map and PAOO-0140 Development Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
February 20, 2002, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended City Council approval of the Application subject to and
based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approving of the
Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F and Section
16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
RID P\2000100-Q140 Village ofTemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc
12
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010)
1. The proposed uses are in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances. The plan to develop an office/retail center
and 160 apartment units is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Office
Professional and Medium Density Residential for the site, provided the service station is
deleted from the plan. A service station at this location would introduce a vehicle-oriented
use that is not compatible with the residential character of the surrounding area.
2. The overall development of the land as conditioned, is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare. The development plan for the site is consistent
with the City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable sections of the
Development Code and related Planned Development Overlay document. Provisions have
been made to minimize the visual impact of the project, and all phases of construction will be
inspected to ensure compliance with the applicable building and fire codes.
Tentative Parcel Map (Section 16.09.140)
3. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. Each lot will conform to the
minimum lot size requirement ofthe original zoning district, and as permitted by the Planned
Development Overlay zone, may have parcels with access across other parcels created on
the same site. Conditions of approval will ensure that the common-use facilities such as
parking, sidewalks, and landscaping are maintained by a Property Owner's Association.
4. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into
pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965
5. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by
the tentative map. Based on environmental documents submitted with the application and an
Initial Study which was prepared by staff in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act, it has been determined that the site is physically suitable for the type and density
of development being proposed. Conditions of approval have been added to ensure that
final soils reports are submitted with the construction plans.
6. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval,
are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat. Based on the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared which will provide conditions and
requirements to reduce the impacts of the project to a less than significant level. City staff
will ensure compliance of the mitigation measures as provided in the Monitoring Plan.
7. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health problems. All phases of construction will be inspected by appropriate
City staff to ensure compliance with all construction and fire codes.
a. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project has been conditioned to
comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy
conservation.
9. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements
acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to
R:\D P\2000100,0140 Village ofTemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
Il
those previously acquired by the public will be provided. As conditioned, the project will be
required to provide access easements across each lot to provide for parking and on-site
circulation.
10. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby).
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Recommend Adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan based on the Initial Study, which was prepared pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally recommends approval of the Application(s) according to the specific conditions set
forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and
all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 20th day of February 2002.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the T emecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 02-_was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of February, 2002, by the following vote
of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
R:ID P\2000\Oo-0140 Village of TemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc
14
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
15
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RID P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
16
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.
PAOO-0140
PAOO-0152
Development Plan
Tentative Parcel Map
Project Description:
PAOO-0140 Construct 160 attached single-family
residential units on approximately 15.26 acres and a
71,100 square foot office/retail center on
approximately 7.71 acres.
PAOO-0152 Tentative Parcel Map subdividing the
current three parcels, which are a portion of lot 24 of
Tract 3334, into a individual parcels.
Development Impact Fee Category:
Residential Attached and Retail Commercial
Approval Date:
944-290-012, 013,and 014.
TBD
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Expiration Date:
TBD
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One
thousand three hundred and fourteen dollars ($1314.00) for the County administrative fee, to
enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code
Section 2110a(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-
eight (4a) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development
Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project
granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The parcel map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the
requirements of the City of Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the
conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State
Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
R\O P\200Q\QQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and CQAs.doc
17
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of
the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim,
action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in
the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City
deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and conditions set forth.
5. After grading, all slopes shall be planted in accordance with the City's Slope Planting
Guidelines. Jute netting will be required on all slopes greater than ten linear feet.
6. An Administrative Development Plan application shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Department for buildings on Pads C, D, and E , prior to issuance of building
permits.
7. The final landscape plan shall indicate street trees planted along the Rancho California
Road frontage as a minimum of 24-inch box London Plane (Plantus Acerfolia 'Bloodgood').
8. Areas proposed for development in another phase occurring not within six months of the
completion of the previous phase shall be temporarily seeded and irrigated for dust and soil
erosion control.
9.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
10. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
11. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits A
through ff and the Color and Material Board on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
12. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer, Property
Owner's Association, or any successors in interest.
13. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
14. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with the Color and Material Board on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
Primary wall exterior:
Entry Doors, Railing, Shutters
Roof
Fascia, Trim and Garage doors
La Habra Stucco "Cortez" (Base 200)
La Habra Stucco "Meadow Brook" (Base 100)
Frazee "Old Porch" LRV 10
Lifetile California "Mission Blend"
Frazee "Old Porch" LRV 10
R:\D P\200Q\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and CQAs.doc
18
15. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
16. The applicant shall submitthe architectural design ofthe apartment buildings for Planning
Commission review. The architecture of the apartment shall be consistent with the
architecture of the office/commercial buildings. (Added by the Planning Commission at
the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
17. The apartment building on the east edge of the property in proximity to Lot numbers 36 and
37 of the Starlight Ridge Development shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the Planning
Department in order to reduce the negative view shed impacts. (Added by the Planning
Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
18. Prior to issuance of building permits, Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
shall be approved by the Planning Department and recorded with the Riverside County
Recorder. The CC&R's shall contain provisions for the creation of a Property Owner's
Association for the maintenance of all landscaping on the commercial parcels, and
maintenance of all internal roadway and hardscape surfaces within those parcels.
19. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian access from the east portion of the Apartment
Complex to Rancho California Road. A Site Plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. (Added by the Planning
Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
20. The applicant shall insure that all trees planted along the east property line of the subject
development be a minimum size of24" box trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape
plans and resubmit the plans for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of a
building permit. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public
hearing)
21. The applicant shall add various tot lots throughout the apartment complex. The size,
content and location shall be incorporated in the landscape plans and submitted to the
planning Department for approval. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February
20, 2002 public hearing)
22. An Administrative Development Plan application shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Department for all (9) nine apartment buildings, garages, carports and clubhouse
proposed in this project. The applicant shall revise the architecture of the apartment
buildings by incorporating the elements found in the retail/ office buildings proposed. The
elevations shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and be approved by the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. (Added by the Planning
Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
Prior to Issuance of an Occupancy Permit
18. All perimeter and slope landscaping, including the Rancho California Road landscape
planter area shall be installed to the approval of the Planning Director, prior to the first
certificate of occupancy.
19. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
20. A one-year landscape maintenance bond of sufficient amount shall be submitted and
approved by the Planning Department.
21. The applicant and owner of the real property represented by this approval shall join and
maintain active membership in the Crime Free Multi-housing Program. (Added by the
Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing)
R:ID P\200010Q,0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
19
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
20. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
21. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter a.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
22. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this
project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no
cost to any Government Agency.
General Requirements
23. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and
their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
24. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department
of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained
road right-of-way.
25. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
26. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for
consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and
shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit:
27. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Riverside County Health Department
f. Verizon
g. Southern California Edison Company
h. Southern California Gas Company
Development Plan
28. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of
Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
29. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all
soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered
structures and preliminary pavement sections.
30. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist
and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site
R\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
20
including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
31. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the
site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage
facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall
capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property.
The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any
upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall
be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall
be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
32. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
33. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
34. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, priorto issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
35. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed
on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
36. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207 A and/or 208.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard Nos. aoo, 801, a02 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400,
401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301, 302 and/or 303.
g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
i. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties.
37. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise
approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets:
R:ID P\2000100,0140 Village ofTemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
2t
a. Street "A" (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft. with 50-ft. right-
of-way.
b. The driveway at the main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76-ft. with a
6' sidewalk on each side.
c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-ft. with a 6' sidewalk
on each side.
d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of
2a-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on each side.
e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards.
f. 90 parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum
safe distance from intersections.
g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration,
stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by
the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works.
h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90).
i. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul-
de-sac or a loop road.
38. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
39. The westerly and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-inlright-out. The main
driveway shall have full turning movements.
40. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities
shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
41. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject
property.
42. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the
Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The City prior to commencement of the
appraisal shall have approved the appraiser.
43. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV,
and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
44. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
45. A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle
access for all private streets and drives.
46. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
47. A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval
R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village ofTemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
22
of the Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
4a. Parcel Map 29140 shall be approved and recorded.
49. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
50. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the
approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and
accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
51. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 ofthe Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
52. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
53. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as
determined by the Department of Public Works.
54. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards -110' RNI/) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median,
deceleration lane.
(i) The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half
width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho California
Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot.
(ii) The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the
existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road.
The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property.
b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed
main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an
additional 1 0' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane.
c. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal
equipment, loops, and interconnect.
d. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and
the main entrance.
55. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
56. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
R:IO P\2000\00,0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
23
57. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
58. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
59. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to
the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Parcel Map
Prior to Approval of the Parcel Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete
the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed
and securities posted:
60. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Rancho California Water District
c. Eastern Municipal Water District
d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
f. Planning Department
g. Department of Public Works
h. Cable TV Franchise
i. Community Services District
j. Verizon
k. Southern California Edison Company
I. Southern California Gas Company
61. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards -110' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median,
deceleration lane.
(i) The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half
width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho Califomia
Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot.
(ii) The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the
existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road.
The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property.
b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed
main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an
additional 1 0' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane.
c. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal
equipment, loops, and interconnect.
d. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and
the main entrance.
62. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
R:\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and CQAs.doc
24
63. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207 A and/or 20a.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, a01, a02 and a03.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400,
401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301, 302 and/or 303.
g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
i. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the.
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties.
64. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise
approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets:
a. Street "A" (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 2a-ft within a 50-ft.
right-of-way.
b. The driveway atthe main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76-ft. with a
6' sidewalk for each.
c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-ft. with a 6' sidewalk
on each side.
d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of
28-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on each side.
e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards.
f. 90 parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum
safe distance from intersections.
g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration,
stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by
the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works.
h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90).
i. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul-
de-sac or a loop road.
65. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
66. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho Califomia Road on the Parcel Map
with the exception of three (3) openings, as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel
Map.
a. The westerly and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-inlright-out. The main
driveway shall have full turning movements.
R:ID P12000100-G140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
25
67. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities
shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
68. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or
other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department
of Public Works.
69. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an
existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to
City Council approval of the Parcel Map, the Developer shall make an application for
reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
70. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
71. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Parcel
Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A
copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The following information shall be on the ECS:
a. The delineation of the area within the 1 OO-year floodplain.
b. Special Study Zones.
c. Geotechnical hazards identified in the project's geotechnical report.
d. Archeological resources found on the site.
72. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject
property.
73. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the
Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off.site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been
approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
74. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV,
and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
75. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
76. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as
determined by the Department of Public Works.
77. A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle
access for all private streets and drives.
78. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated
and noted on the final map.
79. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
80. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or
R\D P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
26
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
a1. A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval
of the Department of Public Works.
a2. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located
outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the
final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept
free of buildings and obstructions. "
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
a3. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Riverside County Health Department
f. Community Services District
g. Verizon
h. Southern California Edison Company
i. Southern California Gas Company
84. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of
Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
85. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all
soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered
structures and preliminary pavement sections.
86. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist
and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site
including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
a7. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the
site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage
facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall
capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property.
The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any
upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall
be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall
be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
88. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
27
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
a9. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
90. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
91. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed
on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
92. Parcel Map shall be approved and recorded.
93. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
94. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the
approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and
accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
95. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
96. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
d. Southern California Edison
97. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
9a. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
99. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to
the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
100. Prior to installation of arterial street lighting, the developer shall file an application with the
TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said street lighting into
the respective TCSD maintenance program.
101. All parkway landscaping, slope areas and interior streetlights shall be maintained by the
property owner or private maintenance association.
R\D P\200Q\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
28
102. The Developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure
areas.
103. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
104. Class II bike lanes shall be included on the street improvement plans for Rancho California
Road. Any damage caused to the existing Class II bike lanes on Rancho Califomia Road as
a result of construction shall be repaired or replaced, as determined by Public Works.
Prior to the issuance of buildina permits:
105. The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement through the payment
of in-lieu fees equivalent to .97 acres of parkland, based upon the City's the current land
evaluation. Said requirement includes a 50% credit for private recreational opportunities
provided on-site and shall be pro-rated at a per dwelling unit cost prior to the issuance of
each building permit requested.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
106. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 199a National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
107. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
108. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
109. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
110. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
111. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
112. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998)
113. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
114. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
115. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
116. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
117. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State
Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the
Building Official, to implement in the building design.
118. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
119. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior\R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
29
to permit issuance.
120. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
121. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
122. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
123. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
124. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
125. Show all building setbacks.
126. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
127. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes that are in force at the
time of building plan submittal.
128. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1875 GPM at
20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of a50 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2725 GPM with a 3-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A)
129. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-l. A minimum of 4 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-21/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and
adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
130. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
131. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum tuming radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020)
132. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
R:\D P\2000\OQ.0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
]0
133. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
ao,ooo Ibs. GVW. (CFC a704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
134. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for ao,ooo Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC see 902)
135. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
136. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
137. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
13a. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
139. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National
Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
140. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
141. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters andlor
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
142. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home
parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which
indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire
hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be
submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
143. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
144. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village ofTemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
]1
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
145. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
in locations approved by the Fire Department. (CFC 902.4)
146. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
147. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
148. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article a1 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article al)
149. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and a001.3)
Special Conditions
150. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the wildland-
vegetation interface. (CFC Appendix II-A)
151. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall
include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block
walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A)
152. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life
safety measures per 1998 CFC, 199a CBC, NFPA -13,24,72 and 231-C.
153. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
154. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
155. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
R\D P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
]2
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
156. The applicant shall comply with all the mitigation measures identified in the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Plan. (Environmental Mitigation Measures)
157. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the United
States Department ofthe Interior Fish and Wildlife Services dated May 31,2000. (Attached
letter)
158. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the Pechanga
Cultural Resources dated January 10, 2002. (attached letter)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R\O P\2QOQ\QO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
]]
CITY OF TEMECULA
UJ AC-J-
7~
o
?J
t;
)>
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
VICINITY MAP
R:\D P\2000\OD-0140 Village ofTemecula\Slaff Report and COAs.doc
]4
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B -.GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(LM) LOW MEDIUM AND (PO) PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
EXHIBIT C - ZONING
DESIGNATION - LM LOW MEDIUM AND PO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - February 20, 2002
R:\D P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
]5
CITY OF TEMECULA
SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
.
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - D INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE. February 20,2002
R:\D P\2000100'0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
]6
CITY OF TEMECULA
.
," . .-. -
COMMERCIAL
-~
::.::=
- -.
~5Y=! !!
: =m::.:~.
-
. ----_.
---..-
.---.,
---..-
.---..
---..-
rlil:::::--=L.M. --.-.J
-
_3~ J~:
-...,----
..----
-_..._..~
-- ----.!i
=-- :5i
-- .-.
~
[ :~
.;..,.. ~;
....-........
-"':\~.:....
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
SITE PLAN
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
]7
CITY OF TEMECULA
.
- - .
-~-=-~
~
, CONCEPTUAL
GRADING
PLAN
-_...-....
---
-....-..
--
.ur.....
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
GRADING PLAN
R:ID P\2000100,0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
]8
CITY OF TEMECULA
SEClXW-
"., -
"
stcnCft _
"J(
SEel""
"y("
S[ClKW
T
SITE SECTIONS
PA#OO-O/40
..........
~--
.._....wo'
--~
-...-....,..,...,J01".
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
GRADING PLAN
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temerula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
]9
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
T'l'PICA.l SlREET SECTIONS
PA#00-0/40
; ~ ~:;~
_. "1'::;,.J
-~-
R'-N~r::::r.;::."nAl1
RAHr:: r~I::MMA !lnAn
-~ t4 :~!~ hll
-.
AI'T.F"<;<; nmllF....... .~_I'"
h4ftI+t
'b lit ~ ::r.,-'
".INI'N~A~(~aAJ..)
~ .~~.!i[
qcrHl)"~=lll.Nff((':(lI,fMEflaAl)
~
'~
~
=
11 - T " I
~~
...... ~N':.':; (~l1-r.o.lolllY)
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
R:\O P\2000100,0140 Village of TemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc
40
-........--..--
---.
5-..=l..'l::::Il...
~
Ei=':--:::E=
---
~---
=
Bl/""',__
"""-"'"
..
...........
::-'::::''':i:;';'-''
---
=::.
~-..
:...'":"=....
I:i==
~.::...~
=~::..":.""-....
"'(104_'"
'_"nr;._~.~r
....-- .
-,-
""--.....
~"ii~:i:--
~~..::::
-.-
-'''''''-
""""-'"
IIulduom~CDt......~tG....,.bloc.
. 4l1ll.......-~.
....CollI.io!MI
lIIllIi-_n .,....,...F.II
......,'..-.
GRADING PLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
-___-C"-
.
. --. -
.
~---
--
UIIIl..ll-. :u:r=
E':::":;.-;:~.::::-
=:: :.::.....
-......-
~~~ ~
- ~ . - -~-_. -
CASE NO.- PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT -I
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
R\O P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
41
o
.
.
'.
---
,-- ., I
-- -..... ....-
-- ......... -,,-
-- -.... -,,-
--- -..... -..--
--....-.....
=
~""=r.o1
~-_..
=....-
-
.
...---.. ..
....- _...,,-
---
[-- .. I
-- .........-..-
-- -..... -"-
-- -.... -..-
--- -.. ..--
~
:.:r=n.'l -..
:.."':::.-,:,:" -.
~.::rr _.
. ~::
,....-...... -
-
'1II~_-==-==:I..
'~~'-.n-
.="~'l'Il'.TU.r_
:~.-~:::..
..--..--...-
--..-
CITY OF TEMECULA
..
m:u.ttWlY PlANTNG PLAN
--~
-~-
l1J.OlID<SIOOUTI<-......O_D
CIfOOlPNll,OOUCII-7!61
PlD€:IIB-&6-M50
~ ~~ ---.- "'"'"
~~ \lD
--- --
_.."'L"'1:I=---"''1oI._
l/14/'1<<1l1\X1-13J
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - J
PlANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
LANDSCAPE PLANS
R:\D P\2000100.{)140 Village ofTemeculalStaff Report and COAs,doc
42
CITY OF TEMECULA
-=6WJi' ~.,
I! 1 j
I _,--. 1 j r-_.
-""-~.LJ...._~'
'MIW ....
fA""""'"
NOIh1lmv"lJOH~.5t.t:
~nfa.o:"'TJOfI~.!:
J I ! 1 !
, ! I JJ' r j I k.---~
I I . ! I ! i j : 'l ! I
~I-.._!,_! : I ;",..~ t j i ,X; Ii.
,~t"'I","",~~'
"""-OC::_;-_-~J"1.._.-"""-__....II --=-- I r
- I (' I I 11
J '--- v '--'..- : ~
.I'AIfJIoUNAN J ~_"".~__""'...l"I..-^~:i
~'"
. ' 'r I'AIl1l..Q.ft.AJI
. ...~~...~
} .~, I _. l .-. j I _.~ .
l!Iu'UU''''UN.lIJI.OW(;S~''::''$ .~QflIAno;m-'.ADA \5i!So~~~
. ...........,. .=:==-== ~
.~~~
R___ .___
R__ __
TEMECULA VILLAGE CENTER
_a
~k
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - K
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
COMMERCIAL FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
4]
:m
e!r~Ancw-llJIl1JINCt;
'JSkr" .,-'
, ,
, '
DmfflEVA~-I/UIU}(H(;G
~
' ,
lllSTflEV.lTICW_IUIl.OiNGH
.._......""".......,,-....
CITY OF TEMECULA
I ' ~~ ~1dl!J ___ :
1iil, ,,' " '.~.., "
, , ,
, '
~Eb
I"AA1lAl.PL4N
A.Et
2~""TlOH~-~ -. - - . WES"Falv....lJl:IolI--~r
~~"1XW-~1L ~~qlVAJX'I'L-5!J.9I'.'-__
~
..m.,.,,.,,
~"_~I dL
~<<
'I I
'-'-._.' !'" --": -':"
~flEV"TION_llIII.DfH(;;l ..MJIlfflaEVATION_ItKl.OrHCI.
~,--
sc:lIll&uvATION.IWJJfNGH
M2B1l1.fUV"JI(W.II.Il.Dl'NGH
"
~~lUVA7IClN-ltJIlDtHGF
. ~~UfV"'OOH_.$HOP'
~
. '.' ,;
~c131
i:biiQ
--
~
t
sourHlUVATIC!N-'MJA
c
0:...-.......__
-p===, ~-=
~!=sF
I~~ ijE-=-
~-- ~-
~- ._-
,
~.~"71Oi>'-,...wA
TEMECULA VILLAGE CENTER
_a
~
~
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - L COMMERCIAL FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
R:\D P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs,doc
44
CITY OF TEMECULA
"'.
~I
~~f~
...
...
PAD-A
FET......-TWEVNRJU.ySf'll'fQ..EAED
~NEA;G.OOOSF
PAD-B
fET......-n'P'EVNRJU.yllf'f'lN(l.EREO
LEASE.la...ENEJo;tI,1XISF
~
--'1'..-"""""",........
TEMECUlA VilLAGE CENTER
-~
I
-M6A-
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - M COMMERCIAL FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
R:\D P\2000\OQ..0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
45
CITY OF TEMECULA
I-'-~'----'----
J-
I
I
I
I
I
BLDO. I
1ETAl..-Tlf'E'<t<lRllY9f'ffl<l..BlED
~NEA>5.500SF
BLDO. H
flETM...Tn'EVNFLU..YSI'f'HJ..B'ED
l.EA.SEABLEA/El.<4.0008l'
BLDO. G
AET.....-nre..,. R.llUlll'fIH(lflI3)
l..EASEA.9LE~4,520SF
..
~
__'~I'(...UI.al.M.~N'a
TEMECULA VILLAGE CENTER
""""-''''
CASE NO. - PAOO.Q138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - N
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
~A
COMMERCIAL FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\O P\2000100-Q140 Village ofTemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc
46
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
,
ii.
. ana. F SECOND R.OOR PLAN
IETAL4TYPEYNFU.LT~
l.b\.9E.Io&.ENEJ,;O,9OOSF
.
B..OO. F RFlST A...OOR PLAN .
1ET......-TYl'E'lNFU.J...TI3f'JN::l..EFEO
l..E/l:lEAa.E~g~8F
TEMECULA VILLAGE CENTER
-.aM ~
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - 0
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
~
.-.-..oy..._...... __.
~
-M€J.A
COMMERCIAL FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000\QO-Q140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
47
(
\
CITY OF TEMECULA
If-e'
IF:.:::=:t!lL=-=::::::::,ill~.ft
ii Ii
ii
",
'\. ,/ :
~
:~~_J
.. .._=,,=.--===.~~
~'- 'Jjm[Ji
II ,--
:1 !1 =- 1j
ioi:.::::_ -loJ fgt=::-.::'
bl- .::::::kJ
CLUBHOUSE FLOOR PLAN
3750 sq.fl.
s.:..L""V......-o'
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - P
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
R:ID P\2000100.0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
48
r'-~'~
, ,
L .j
[--I
, ,
1--._.1
.
~
_.l.R.....,ARCIlIT8::TI.IIC.j;;
_.....=.::-.:.:
---
CLUBHOUSE FLOOR PLANS
CITY OF TEMECULA
"
~
l
~
:.
~EFAONTB..EY"'TIOM
REAREUVA110N
.
;,
I
LEFTSDEnEYATION
RIQKT SIDE nEYATION
-
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_.l.fI......~lM(:.b;!
-.-="'.. A-2
---
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - Q
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2QOO\DO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
49
CITY OF TEMECULA
...~.
t
10
10
t
'0
.0
BUILDING TYPE 'I' FIRST FLOOR PLAN
. VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_......VNltAl'tClWlU:'n,-.c.~
-..="'''" A-3
---
. CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - R
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000100.0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
50
CITY OF TEMECULA
'IN'''.
~
BUILDING TYPE 'I' SECOND FLOOR PLAN
&(;-..z'II...1'-<1"
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_L",~~,",..-c.Fl
-:.::=.~ ~ A",
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - S
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000\DO.0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
5t
CITY OF TEMECULA
..
e.
8tIIl.O"O TYPE I - FRONT ILeVATlON
8UlLDDCO TYPE I" 6lDf ELEYAllOtI
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_I.FLY"AII~.INC.F1
-..::s.= ~ A-&
CASE NO. - PAOo-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - T
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000100-Q140 Village of Teme<:tJlalStaff Report and COAs.doc
52
CITY OF TEMECUlA
-~.
1
.
t
BUILDING TYPE 'lIa' FIRST FLOOR PLAN
VillAGE OF TEMECUlA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
sc......,"...1'-O"
_.............AftCHI1'EC'n".MC.[;;;I
-..---.. A-
---
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - U
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000\OO-o140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
5]
CITY OF TEMECULA
_.r
t
!').---f. :
II III
It-_-_~ :
BUILDING TYPE 'lIa' SECOND FLOOR PLAN
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
sc.....ev...1'-O"
_.LR.,.,..~CItrTECTS,IIfC.[;;I
-.=""" A-7
----
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - V
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:IO P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
54
CITY OF TEMECULA
1111
Ill! II i
,
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_.a.Fl,.YMNj"IteKrECTa,INC.Fl
-'-:'::;;'= ~ A-a
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - W
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2.00Q\OO-o140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
55
CITY OF TEMECULA
Q~W
A-1R
B-2R
t
"
"
BUILDING TYPE 'III' FIRST FLOOR PLAN
. .
, ,
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOME;S FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_"'R,*~~.~~ A-91
CASE NO. - PAOO-0138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - X .
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEV ATIONS
RID P\2000100-Q140 Village ofTemecula\Slaff Report and COAs.doc
56
CITY OF TEMECULA
ur~
t
~-~1
.1 III
it_-_~ I
.
=
r'i------{'ll
'I [II
tt-____~:
BUILDING TYPE 'III' SECOND FLOOR PLAN
"""'-""........
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_...R.,......~,IJfC.~
----=."."" A-1C
---
CASE NO_ - PAOO-o138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - Y
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2QQQ\QQ-Q14Q Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
57
CITY OF TEMECULA
~
r
~
BUa...olNG TYPE m FRONT -AND REAR ELEVATION
II II
-----------------
-----------------
. .
BlM..DlNG TYPE m SIDE ELEV A TlON
BUILDING TYPE HI SIDE ELEVATION
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_"'I'I.YllNoUI~n.-.c.b;j
_.-="."" A-11
--- .
CASE NO. - PAOO-o138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT -Z
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village ofTemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc
58
CITY OF TEMECULA
13<&'''.
t
A-1R
'10
I
t
BUILDING TYPE 'IV' FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCA'-e..........,.
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMes FOR LEASE.
TEMECULA, -CALIFORNIA
_"'R.~~C'1lI.INC.b;j
-.--=."."" A-12
---
CASE NO. - PAOO-o138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - aa
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
59
CITY OF TEMECULA
~
BUILDING TYPE 'IV' SECOND FLOOR PLAN
.CAU:'''....-o-
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMEs. FOR ~EASE '
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
_...R.......~IMC.~
-~..__....
---
A-13
CASE NO. - PAOO-o138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - bb
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs,doc
60
CITY OF TEMECULA
BUILOlMO TYPE I y. FROtfT ELEVAllON
8UIl..DCNQ TYPE: I Y- SlOE ELEVATION
Yol~h~R~fisPF TEMECULA
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
r
;,
Ii
_.l.A.V..ARCHIftC'n...:.[;]
-'.-=."''''' A-14
---
CASE NO. - PAOO-D138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - cc
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs,doc
61
PLAN B-1
...BIT..IIU!....... _'G.l'T.
__R.ooII.uru. _'O-Ff.
~-
I
PLAN B-3
UJlTAILE.Ao .. IOIT.
__R..OOllARE&. ....ton.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLAN 8-2
IIABlTAaLEAfIEIu ton'OIT.
__I\.OOIIAIIEA. _1tQ..fT.
,
~
-(t.:::j) II]
~
BUILDING TYPE II - TYPICAL 4-CAR
GARAGE UNDER 8-4 UNIT
PLAN B-4
KAm~'1lEL
VILLAGE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
tat.an,
CASE NO. - PAOO-o138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - dd
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20, 2002
TYPICAL 4.CAR
GARAGE PLAN
1ll!Ma.LA.nIillollCtlnCn '~[;J
-.....--....
_-:.-:.:::
A-15
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\2000100-0140 Village of Temecula\Slaff Report and COAs,doc
62
CITY OF TEMECULA
r
PLAN A-1
IU.lIfTAaI.a"AIIEAo 7OO1Q.F'T.
--~_ ntlCU'T.
PLAN A-3
IlA8ITAIU MEA. JOO IQJ'T.
ItM..DItl3A.OO1lAIIU. mlQ}'T.
VILLA GE OF TEMECULA
HOMES FOR LEASE .
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. - PAOO-o138, 0139, 0140 & 0152
EXHIBIT - ee
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- February 20,2002
R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
r
~,
=--- '--'.
,--- "-
.u.'1;i';;"TI!--
~--
PLAN A-2
MUlTAaE:AIltA. ,.. ICl.FT.
-.... "- _ 7711Q.JT.
PLAN A-4
IIAlIJTAIU!Idlf4. ..'IQ.F'T.
~IlGFI.OOIl.IlEA. 8M'~.FT_
-- "-1'\..,.. AllCIflYCTI. Me. [;;]
_..,=~.:o; A-16
---
APARTMENT FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
63
ATTACHMENT NO.8
LETTERS RECEIVED
R:ID P\2000l00-0140 Village of TemeculalCC Agenda Report,doc
31
2/19/02 '
Temecula City Planning Commission
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92591
To Whom It May Concern:
Subject: SEE ATTACHED
My name is Debra Moreno I am a homeowner in the Starlight Ridge my address
is 42767 Twilight Court, I am one of the Twenty-one homeowners that border the
proposed project,l have been a resident of T emecula for 11 years, When I first
moved here it was great, no traffic, no noise you could sit in your backyard and
only hear cricketts chirpping. I have lived at my current address for 8 years, 6 of
the years I rented the home I currently reside in. I bought my home two years
ago because of the great view that I have from my backyard and the open space
between my home and or homes in the vicinity, the noise 2 years ago was
minimal and the traffic was minimal. That has all changed, The traffic as we all
know is horrible now and the noise from the traffic goes on untif late in the night.
The proposed project will:
1), Obstruct my view and the view of the other bordering residents.
2), Lower the value of my home/property,
3). Increase traffic (which the city does not need),
4). Noise levels will double due to increased traffic and people.
These are the main reasons I oppose the project. Please view this as if it were
your home.
iJrr;~lJff
Debra Moreno
&i?V0?0~J'1~" j, .
ps,. J (!Add J1d cdiMUI vf)1J!I!fi'-?!
~J w~ J~M,
z,'1
~o'lS Co5n.;'C D/". kr'),
-p.f!'(L-fj-r,j/iWi0ttll LiZ050 CC>~/M LC- Ve, '5€-A.
l1ZfJS~ C-a9't/o -#2. v:c/f
l./2'f1-'L ~ S-t- ~
32 III ~;:,r ~Oyec~ l125'l2
lj.7-~-r- ~-9.M' {j2JJ2
LId. '; n h CluL. cLuvv Pc
"7//:7/ /if/#:#- dl.HtIi- DIL-
31/1/ /JJ//?/J o!.MJ/j zY. ~
.~/7fo 9JTI Coj)~W
3t>!!b srn. 0p,~J.h:;:2)r)/
"tS
,.J
2-13-02
Temecula City Planning Commission
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92591
The people of Alta Vista, Star Light Ridge North, Star Light Ridge South,
and the Villages homeowners associations are disappointed in the design
acceptance and handling of matters regarding the Temecula Village project
located on the south side of Rancho California Road approximately 200 feet
west of the intersection at Cosmic Dr. The first neighborhood meeting
regarding the project brought opposition to more apartments and a rezoning
to commercial of the bottom half of the properties in question. David Hogan
recorded citizens' expectations and promised no impact to the single-family
homes adjoining the project.
Recently another neighborhood meeting was held. The project concept had
not changed. Attending residents again raised similar opposition to the
project. Unfortunately the mailed notice for the meeting identified the
wrong wly. Many impacted residents were unable to voice their concerns.
Twenty-one homeowners directly border the proposed project on the eastern
and southern sides. Several hundred surrounding homeowners will be
impacted as well. Other Temecula residents currently needing to use the
Rancho California corridor will also feel the consequences ofTemecula
Villages. Correct planning is essential to benefit residents, developer, and
.the city.
"
Our concerns address several issues. Plans for Temecula Villages show
apartments blocking view sheds of single home residents along the eastern
border. Commercial buildings are 10 feet from the fence line of Cosmic Dr.
residences. Parking lots are visible from Rancho California Road. No Buffer
exists between residential and commercial. Commercial buildings and
apartments are not the proper transitional structures to single home
. neighborhoods. Layout of commercial structures doe ot encourage a
sense of community. Another stop light on Rancho fo' a road at the
Portofino Apartments will be a necessity not an amenity if c is to gain
access to businesses in Temecula Villages. Commercial build' . add
to the volume of noise, light, and traffic in our neighbor s.
1
............
)'
The current Temecula Villages project is in violation of the General Plan
and places neighborhoods in direct conflict with developers. Noted
violations of the General Plan are included in the following document.
Planning still has the ability to remedy the current violations and provide a
long term, beneficial situation to all residents, developer, and the city of
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Scott Hanson, President
Starlight Ridge North
Homeowners Association
Ray Johnson, President
Starlight Ridge South
Homeowners Association
Burlie Cole, President
Alta Vista
Homeowners Association
Clark Cegley, President
The Villages
Homeowners Association
2
\~
/bY ;J 1J~"'3
tko7/f!oJIYl! (/ ]~--/!/6
~~ 14Ah/ -
'1~S-.2{) tIeJ dk1-lJ PE
1~ /Y~
/{
~r>t
Lf;Wlb~'v 'Pr.~
~(LL, $~--~c-/ "
,
~/L/6ff7 ~
/
~ /Y)-f()~
'1rJ1IJI rwdiffhJ lj-.
VYlfM\'l0 G. S'cA~_
y { f! f.{ :BOYEo.J,;:s . v.e--
~. keuk
~ ((cfJ @o1Ul~;PL ~
/~~
(/
'I / ~ 1 J JJt'J>tl-uui; -; PV>:
~
2-13-02
~~ @ ~ 0 w ~ml
uU FES 2 0 2002 @,
Temecula City Planning Commission
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92591
8y
The people of Alta Vista, Star Light Ridge North, Star Light Ridge South,
and the Villages homeowners associations are disappointed in the design
acceptance and handling of matters regarding the Temecula Village project
located on the south side of Rancho California Road approximately 200 feet
west of the intersection at Cosmic Dr. The first neighborhood meeting
regarding the project brought opposition to more apartments and a rezoning
to commercial of the bottom half of the properties in question. David Hogan
recorded citizens' expectations and promised no impact to the single-family
homes adjoining the project.
Recently another neighborhood meeting was held. The project concept had
not changed. Attending residents again raised similar opposition to the
project. Unfortunately the mailed notice for the meeting identified the
wrong day. Many impacted residents were unable to voice their concerns.
Twenty-one homeowners directly border the proposed project on the eastern
and southern sides. Several hundred surrounding homeowners will be
impacted as well. Other Temecula residents currently needing to use the
Rancho California corridor will also feel the consequences of Temecula
Villages. Correct planning is essential to benefit residents, developer, and
the city.
Our concerns address several issues. Plans for Temecula Villages show
apartments blocking view sheds of single home residents along the eastern
border. Commercial buildings are 10 feetfrom the fence line of Cosmic Dr.
residences. Parking lots are visible from Rancho California Road. No Buffer
exists between residential and commercial. Commercial buildings and
apartments are not the proper transitional structures to single home
neighbClrhoods. Layout of commercial structures does not encourage a
sense of community. Another stop light on Rancho California road at the
Porto fino Apartments will be a necessity'not an amenity if traffic is to gain
access to businesses in Temecula Villages. Commercial buildings will add
to the volume of noise, light, and traffic in our neighborhoods.
,
The current Temecula Villages project is in violation of the General Plan
and places neighborhoods in direct conflict with developers. Noted
violations of the General Plan are included in the following document.
Planning still has the ability to remedy the current violations and provide a
long term, beneficial situation to all residents, developer, and the city of
Temecula.
Sincerely,
<f~~tfV/
Scott Hanson, President
Starlight Ridge North
Homeowners Association
f),~ d Crk-
Burlie Cole, President
Alta Vista
Homeowners Association
C ar Cegley,
The Villages
Homeowners Association
1-29-2002
I~~ @ ~ 0 w ~ nil
1 u; 11 I
I~ FEB 202002 III
ur Ilj/
E~_ U
---
Temecula City Planning Commission
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92591
Dear Planning Commission,
Alta Vista, Starlight Ridge North, Starlight Ridge South and the Villages homeowners
associations are very disappointed in the design acceptance and handling of matters
regarding the Temecula Village project. The first neighborhood meeting regarding
this project was held about a year ago and brought great neighborhood opposition to
more apartments and a potential up zoning to commercial in this area. Notes were
made by Dave Hogan regarding citizens expectations and the project was to be
redesigned to meet land use compatibility issues.
A recent neighborhood meeting was held. The project concept did not change from a
year ago and the advertised meeting notice sent out by mail to impacted residences
identified the wrong day for the meeting. This has not allowed a group of impacted
residents opportunity to voice their concerns. However, this letter is meant to do so.
This project directly impacts 21 homes on the eastern and southern borders. Impact
creates a ripple effect through all homeowners associations as like properties become
a comparable. This project violates zoning consistency requirements, land use
compatibility requirements, CEQA requirements, transitional density requirements,
growth management requirements, noise requirements, traffic impact requirements, air
quality requirements, basic design standards and multiple general planning
guidelines as out lined in the City General Plan.
\
It was clearly stated at both community meetings by the developer and Planning that
owners view sheds would not be obstructed and that roof tops would never be above
the existing ridge line. After reviewing the grading, plot and site plans, it clearly shows
that roof lines are well above the existing ridge line and between 15-30 feet of building
will be blocking view sheds of houses along the easterly border of this project. This is
a direct violation of chapter 10 of the General Plan and ruins our quality of life. after
purchasing our homes.
Proiect Background and Violations of the General Plan
If you drive around Temecula and look at structures within the "M" zoning designation,
with the exception of the inappropriately passed Temecula Ridge Apartment complex, '
you will see the new Richmond and Ryland single family home developments as well
as the other completed single family home developments of California Summit,
1
Country Glen and La Serena. These projects are consistent in housing type, old or
new, and live up to the General Plan guidelines for zoning consistency requirements
as required by law. It is ordered by the State that day to day actions by the City be
,consistent. If personal judgment of a planner is outside of what is consistently built
within the City, then it is wrong. A developer suggesting incompatible land use that is
not consistent with other structure types within a zoning designation is wrong.
The General Plan calls for "transitional density, transitional structure types, open
buffers and protection to surrounding single family homes". The land use element
ensures a quality of life to the citizens of Temecula. Land use goals emphasize
compatibility. The community has expressed a desire for lower densities with an
adopted Growth Management Plan.
Due to single family homes being classified as a sensitive receptor, commercial and
apartments fail to meet land use compatibility issues and produce an overall negative
impact in terms of light pollution, noise pollution, traffic pollution, and undesirable
visual effects as defined in the Land Use Element. Apartments fall short of meeting
Goal 3 of chapter 2 that requires planning "to protect and enhance residential
neighborhoods". The size, bulk and out-of-scale configuration of this project violates
policies 3.1,3.2 and 3.3 of this element. These policies clearly protect single
family homes from apartments and commercial developments.
Goal 4 of the land use element says "to preserve and enhance the environmental
resources of the study area. This includes retaining open space, natural landscape,
enforcement of hillside grading standards, habitat conservation and trail system
development".
Chapter 3 of the General Plan strives to "maintain a traffic level better than Service
Level D during peak hours and better that Service Level C du'ring non peak hours".
Policies 1.1 - 1.5 will not be met with up zoning and increased density. Failure to
update and implement traffic studies per our General Plan is wrong, clouds planning
decisions and ultimately hurts the community.
Chapter 4 of the General Plan wants to "conserve" existing housing and remain
"responsive to the unique concerns of the community". The City has the opportunity
and power to do so rather than to let a developer dictate a land use.
Chapter 50f the General Plan states that "open space is one of the key features that
defines the character of Temecula and contributes to the quality of life that residents
want to maintain. Open space performs a multitude of functions that are beneficial to
the community. Open space functions to: provide for outdoor recreation areas; protect
view sheds; preserve important natural resources; provide flood control; protect public
health and safety; and establish buffers between incompatible land uses". Goal 1
states that "It is important that land use and development decisions capitalize on and
maintain the natural assets of a given location. The preservation of the remaining
2
hillsides and ridge lines of the city and'of the surrounding area is important to many
residents and results in a more enjoyable and satisfying urban environment. The
transition between the urbanized areas and rural areas is particularly important in
creating a cohesive image of the community. There is a need for hillside development
standards that encourage innovative site and building design to enhance the visual
quality of development and preserves significant natural features or special habitat
areas. The city also has the opportunity to create a positive urban design element with
enhancement and linkage between its parks, water features and other open space
lands".
Chapter 6 of the General Plan states "properly designed and implemented, a
comprehensive growth management program provides a framework that will enable
Temecula to balance and accommodated diverse and competing interests, WHILE
ENSURING THE QUALITY OF LIFE EXPECTED BY THE CITIZENS OF
THE COMMUNITY".
Chapter 8 of the General Plan states that "It is intended that the noise exposure
information developed for the Noise Element be incorporated into the General Plan to
serve as a basis for achieving land use compatibility. It is also intended that noise
exposure information be used to provide BASELINE information" .
"Noise sensitive land uses include, but are not limited to residences, schools, libraries,
hospitals and churches These typify land uses where suitability is restricted by
intrusive noises".
"Many jurisdictions consider residential uses particularly noise sensitive because
families and individuals expect to use time in the home for rest and relaxation, and
intrusive noise can interfere with those activities. Single family uses are frequently
considered the most sensitive". This sensitivity to noise is reflected in the guidelines
for acceptability provided in Figure 8-1 of the General Plan. Noise measurements
were taken during a typical week day at 19 locations throughout the City of Temecula.
Noise levels exceeded the 65 CNEL criteria at seven of the nineteen locations. Six of
these locations are noise sensitive receptors. One site location was from Cosmic
Drive at a house 5 feet above grade. The noise level was 66.8 CNEL. This was a
baseline test in 1993.
Chapter 8 states that "the 65CNEL is generally considered the maximum exterior level
acceptable for these uses". If a residence fronts along a roadway, the noise exposure
in this area would be considered excessive. Goal 1 of chapter 8 wants "land use
planning that provides for the separation ,of significant noise generators from sensitive
receptor areas. Proper planning will ensure that sensitive receptors are not impacted
by noise hazards by locating these land uses distant from each other". Policy 1.1
"discourages noise sensitive land uses in noisy exterior environments". Policy 1.8
says "to minimize noise conflicts between land uses".
Goal 2 of chapter 8 wants the "control of noise between land uses". Policy 2.1 "limits
3
the maximum permitted noise levels which cross property lines and impact adjacent
land uses". Goal 3 says to "consider noise issues in the planning process. Noise
issues should always be considered during the planning process so that needed
measures are incorporated in design and location of land uses", Policy 3.4 says to
"evaluate potential noise conflicts for individual sites and projects". Goal 4 says to
"minimize noise impacts from transportation noise sources", Policy 4.1 says to
"develop a program to construct barriers to mitigate sound levels where necessary or
where feasible to ensure the peace and quiet of the community".
Goal 1 of chapter 9 wants "the improvement of air quality through proper land use
planning in Temecula". Policy 1.3 says "to minimize land use conflicts between
. ,
emission sources and sensitive receptors". Policy 1.4 says "to reduce air pollution
emissions by mitigating air quality impacts associated with development projects to the
greatest extent feasible". Chapter 9, under land use, says "to locate sensitive
receptors" away from major air pollution sources and require full buffering of sensitive
receptors from air pollution sources through the use of landscaping, open space and
other separation techniques".
Chapter 10 of the General Plan states that "the goals, policies, and design concepts of
the community design element are an integral part of all the elements of the General
Plan. Community design objectives contribute to how we perceive the community,
what we experience and those characteristics that we want to preserve. Temecula has
a rich tradition and an outstanding natural environmental setting, New development
can enhance this character or it can destroy it. Through effective community design
and land planning, the important spatial considerations for the land use; circulation
patterns and the details of design can be directed into the most effective and beneficial
community design for the City".
Goals and policies of Chapter 10 state that "many residents are concerned about the
height and bulk of recently constructed structures in the City. Standards need to be
carefully developed for the Development Code to achieve a scale of development that
is in balance with the surrounding area". Policy 2,1 says "to establish a'nd consistently
apply design standards and guidelines for residential and non-residential
development". Policy 2.2 says "to promote a cohesive and integrated pattern of
development for large undeveloped areas", Policy 2.3 says "to provide development
standards to ensure higher quality design that is well integrated", POlicy 2.5 says "to
Limit light I glare pollution",
Goal 3 of chapter 10 says wants "preservation and enhancement of the positive
qualities of individual districts or neighborhoods. While there is a major concern about
the overall city-wide character of Temecula, it is also important to preserve and
ehhance the character and identity of the neighborhood areas or special districts of the
community. Of oarticular imoortance. is the oreservation of the character
for the sinale familv neighborhoods and their orotection from intrusions
from buildinas that are "out of scale". incomoatible land uses and
4
excessive vehicular traffic". Policv 3.2 savs "to preserve the scale and
character of residential develooment by creatinq aooropriate transitions
between lower densitv. rural areas. and hiaher density development".
Goal 5 of chapter 10 wants the "protection of public views of significant natural
features. One of Temecula's most important resources is its environmental setting.
The community desires to protect and enhance the views to these natural features..
Policy 5.1 says to "work with the County of Riverside to protect the surrounding hillside
areas". Chapter 10 states that "hillside design should result in minimal disturbance of
the natural terrain and vegetation".
Chapter 10 states that "the compatibility between the character of
existing single family neighborhoods and adjacent proposed projects is
also an important consideration within the community. Key
considerations in the planning and design of projects adjacent to
existing single family neighborhoods includes the following :
1. Proposed land use densities should provide a density transition
or buffer to improve compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods.
2. Proposed projects should be designed in terms of height,
architectural style, bulk, location of parking and vehicular and non-
vehicular access, to be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods".
When we became a General Law City, inappropriate up zoning and mistakes by the
county should have been changed. A City has the power to do so. We became a City
to make our community a better place. The General Plan states that "a potentially
effective tool that will be examined is the feasibility of a TRANSFER OF
, DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR) PROGRAM. This is a critical component of the
General Management Plan due to the significance of the resources to the long-term
quality of life within the community. Prior to incorporation, the City experienced a
, severe loss of open space, and shortage of parks and recreation facilities due to
deficient park planning. Repetition of this situation, as Temecula continues to grow,
can be avoided through proactive growth management planning".
Conclusions
On February 8th, 2001, Planning should have stated to the developer that commercial
and more apartments were not acceptable for this area. With proper ground rules from
planning regarding proper transitional structure type and density, the MJW Property
Group could choose not to purchase this property for their project design. The
developer could then choose to move on to another piece of land or offer the correct
product for the neighborhood. Planning has again failed to eliminate conflict between
the development and the adjoining neighborhoods.
5
All "H" or high density apartment zones are "built out" except for a redevelopment area
in Old Town. Planning "build out" should simply mean "no more". To up zone this
area at the expense of an entire neighborhood to benefit a developers pocket book is
wrong. To place apartments next to single family homes is poor planning and wrong
according to the General Plan. A summary and preponderance of evidence from the
General Plan stating why this project is wrong for this area is enclosed.
This raw land, although up zoned "M" and "PO" from a hillside residential density
horse ranch, is currently a proper buffer for the single family homes of the Starlight
Ridge and Alta Vista Tracts. By description, this includes steep terrain, natural
watercourses, natural coastal sage vegetation and natural habitat. The uniqueness of
this property makes it impossible to mitigate the damages of another apartment project
and commercial uses in this area. The General Plan states that all chapters of the
General Plan are equal in stature and weight equally when considering a projects'
land use. One chapter cannot be mitigated over another because it is against
Government Code Sections 65860 and 65567 to do so.
In review of the General Plan, we find that the Temecula Village project violates 9
chapters of the General Plan in concepts, goals and policies. In doing so, this project
violates California State laws and Government Codes governing our General Law
City. We also feel that the Temecula Village Apartments do not meet the goals of the
Growth Management Plan and should not be allowed increased density over 7 units
per acre.
Apartments or commercial can never enhance the design or character of a single
family neighborhood. Close proximity, high density, extreme height or bulk, out.of-
scale buildings, light or glare pollution, noise pollution, air pollution, blocked views or
unsightly views of large buildings next toa single family home development make the
single family homes unattractive to potential buyers and unlivable for the occupants.
Privacy of a single family home is so obviously disturbed that a potential buyer may not
purchase the home if it was offered for sale. This devalues a long term investment for
the Citizens and hurts them financially. If homes in a tract are devalued then all of the
tract is devalued due to comparable sales of like kind and quality of home. This
creates a ripple affect lowerina all values in the tract and ultimatelv
lowerin9 the City's tax base. An example of a City on the verge of bankruptcy
due to the erosion of the property value base due to an overabundance of apartments
is the City of Upland. You should speak with them about the mistakes that they made
by giving developers what they want.
Obvious effects to the quality of life include increased gridlock past level "0" ,
overcrowded schools and a potential for increased crime. High density without the
proper infrastructure or facilities only hurts a community. The increased density of this
project will increase the cost to maintain the City services in this area. Approving high
density projects of any kind before new schools can be built only worsens our current
condition of overcrowded schools and hurts our children. Our City has grown very
6
rapidly and the schools claim that they cannot keep up with the educational demands
placed on them. By passing the Temecula Village Apartments, the developer has not
ensured the quality of life expected by the citizens of the community. Temecula Village
will create a total of 400 new families in this area in conjunction with Temecula Ridge.
Commercial traffic will add significantly more trips on top of the residential trips in this
immediate area. Logically, a few thousand additional car trips between Cosmic and
Moraga per day added to the current traffic levels is not in the best interests of the City
or the neighboring tracts.
The General Plan is very clear about noise and the effects on single family homes.
, Land use and type of structure is highly stressed in chapter 8 of the General Plan. The
65 CNEL level was exceeded in this general area and corridor in 1993 as stated in the
General Plan baseline data and can only be higher in 2002. Increased housing
density makes noise intolerable in this general area. The noise study submitted by the
Temecula Ridge Apartment Project is highly suspect. Highly suspect because the
level stated was lower than the baseline study at Cosmic Drive in 1993. How can this
be? We suspect that the same study was used for Temecula Village. General Plan
traffic data is supposed to be updated every 3 years as stated in the enclosed excerpts
for review. Citizens would like to have a current independent noise study done in this
area as well as the other areas stated in the General Plan. New studies would
probably yield this whole area unsuitable for residential units.
The Temecula Village project fails to meet guidelines of the Design Element of the
General Plan. Commercial and apartments are not how the citizens of Temecula
perceive our community. The City markets Temecula with a picture of rural
residential rather than a picture of an apartment complex. Why is that?
Commercial and apartments show no spatial considerations for land use. Commercial
and apartments, by nature, are never really compatible with single family homes and
not intended to be due to the many reasons stated iri the General Plan.
The developer did not own the land at the time. Responsibility went to the Planning
Department to discourage the project due to land use compatibility issues and should
have ensured the right product for the neighborhood. At the time, Dave Hogan stated
a great concern over not creating impact to adjoining single family homes and
promised citizens no impact to their adjoining neighborhoods.
In a neighborhood meeting approximately a year ago regarding Temecula Ridge,
citizens asked about T emecula Village and Dave Hogan denied the existence of an
application or what was actually being planned for this area. Based on the concerns
at the Kading meeting, Mr. Kading told us that he wished that he owned the Temecula
Village project land so that he could fully develop the area into a compatible as well as
suitable project to not impact himself as well as the other neighborhoods. Citizens
asked him if he owned the land if a medium density project like a Ryland or Richmond
project would economically work to protect our single family homes. He said yes and
then stated that he did not own the land.
7
We want the City to choose the right type of structure and land use for this area.
Citizens feel that the proper Land use in this area is single family or single family
detached condominiums such as the Ryland or Richmond projects in order to preserve
the property values of the existing single family homes with ownership as well as to
mitigate all other issues.
We ask that you reject this project as proposed. We expect the City to follow the
guidelines of the General Plan. The Citizens of Temecula have the right to maintain
their quality of life as this is provided for them in the City General Plan iffollowed. The
City Planning Department is chartered to protect the Citizens of T emecula and have
failed to do so regarding this particular land use.
It is important that this information be a part of the public record. If our property values
diminish over time, potential class action litigation mayor may not arise based on your
final decisions. Please choose to protect our quality of life and property values.
Sincerely,
A~~
Scott Hanson, President
Starlight Ridge
Homeowners Association
~.(..1': cI C~
Burlie Cole, President
Alta Vista Homeowners Association
cc Susan Jones, City Clerk
Sam Pratt, City Council
Mike Naggar, City Council
Jeff Comerchero, City Council
Ron Roberts, City Council
Jeff Stone, City Council
Dennis Chiniaeff, Planning Commission
Ron Guerriero, Planning Commission
David Mathewson, Planning Commission
John Telesio, Planning Commission
Mary Jane Ohlasso, Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
Dave Hogan, City Planning Department
Rolfe Preisendanz, Planning
8
TEMECULA
MEETING
CITY PLANNING~MMISSION
JANUARY 14th 2002 AT 7 P.M.
.
We the undersigned residents/homeowners of Starlight Ridge directly
impdted by the proposed change in zoning, are vehemently opposing the
change to Retail zoning,plaKned for this property,if granted this chan-
ge will lower the property values in our area by at least JO%.
We respectfully ask to not validate this zoning change.....,
Homeowners
.-Jacob. J .Hes
- Charlotte Me Donald
Mike and Terry Nagy
_ Bob, and Denise Grimsey
- Carmella Last~~
--Billand Billy Chamberlain
~edrick and Laura Sadler
~~im and Lisa Fuller
- Darrel and Jackiee
St.illman
__Giovanni Calabresa
'J0275
J0291
JOJ05
JOJ21
JOJJ6
JOJJO
J0290,
J0260
~
.------ '.
L~ne ~~~~
" //7/:<$/:h)-s /~ ?cat#-
Nebula
"
"
"
"
"
"
Y>v--
"
"
42050
42059
Cosmic
"
,
~
(
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
PUBLIC HEARING
Agenda Item No. 15
September 17, 2002
_,.c":":":'.'
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council\Cit;'t.l~mJger
Debbie Ubnos~ ~j;:'ector of Planning
September 17, 2002
PAOO-0140 Temecula Village - Site Sections
Please find attached to this memorandum site sections for the Temecula Village project. While
it is anticipated that this project will be continued at the meeting on September 17, 2002. the
applicant thought the sections might prove helpful to the Council in their review of the project.
R:\DEBBIElcc lemacula village memo.doc
1
CD
=
1162.4
~
~
1162.7
1159,0
~
,.....,
1168.0
1169.3
1152.3
1126.2
1136.9
~
::::~
!::;It:
~~
"'<: ;;;
<=>
1121.5
1121.7
'~VJ r
----t."
>- g
c::::J , -<.
~ I '6:~
- :':J'
",,""j~'
~'~ r"'"1
-"""l
...
...
r-
<!'>
y
\
,
.h-
I'
\
\
.,
x:
\
\
\
\
\
~
~
z
Z
""'
~
'!6;&
8sa
z 0
0""
g
)
''I" ;
-u
>- ,
=
'"
z
""
~, C")
?d'
<':;:\
,~\
V>
...
...
(j')
rrt
o
::j
o
2
0;
<=>
g1
iil
~
.,;
"
53 ,...,1
8~
z~
0""
)
"
~
)
1
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
\
\
I
I
'D I .
1>- ._--,.--..
. ~ I --r : -r) ~,\
, "----)I 0 x' 1''-
S _I~I C U) ! \
'-~-r U) --,
Q') C) rT]
'01
(" I
J
;;;
:3
=
~
~
1140,5
1148.3
,.....,
1158.2
1173.1
~
0<
1189,0
1189.3
-l>o-
1188,6
1194,5 .
1182.1
U1
~
::::~
f:;;1t:
~~
"'<:
1127,1 ~
1132.9
...
;A;....
(j')
rrt
o
---i
-
o
::2:
...
...
~
0;
<=>
0;
o
I
\
\,
t
I
\
\
I,:.
"
!\3;&
.~~
.
C' '."L
..~ .
.- - .
: iE~ fl' I
-I !
p' E i~i1I~
. -, .:::::
,:::::J.,.._.......
. :'. :Ej",il:.!i.
,....., 'IB" '.....1
b ;'" :i;:ii~:
- ",.
.. :0:;:;:.
-an ~'''::: ':
~"r'
",'"
. if:
. ..1
I '
"
;.ffil
\
\
\
i!
i
\
\
h>
,',
\
\
\.,.
F
\
\
.. \
\
\.,
~
\
:.-0
>-
, ^"
""
z
""
""
>-
^'
'>-
~
~
'. i__
\-
\.
\
\
\
~
\
\
\"
\"
\
\
\
C
I
I
I
I
11
\
\
\1--
\
\
\
\'.<.
r.
/
I
tr
!
/
/ :
r
F'
/
/
/
(~
/
/
/
!
t
-U I _ _ _u. __ _ \
J__', r ''1
r' '" I .::::
C'i< ,-.....
:;',1 C :,,'
. I U:,
Pl
::1
.
, ',,~.
~~
z='
o~
)
'.
(j') (j')
rrt rrt
... 0 ... 0
C-... ...
::j - ::j
... ...
... ...
~ 0 ~ 0
::::~ 2 ::::~ 2
~It: ~lt:
~~ ~~
"'<: ;;; "'<: ;;;
1116.4 ;;; <!'> ~ g1 8 1116,1 ..., <!'> 0; g1 8
<=> <=> <=>
= -., =
I I
\ I
\ I
I" I'"
r I,
I I '!6;&
I fi~
1120,1 -'<"''''-r. {. 1117.3 I OKl
0
~,\.- "V
,.,' V>
<=1 = ~
'II' 5
'3''"' '
.'~~~i""!' -<
-~>:.{ 3
C>
~ :...,
,
;;;
8
~
0<
"0
~
,)
~
~
1121.4
-
~
~
1120,5
.
-of-
'>1""
=.....
~.~
== -<
-:;<;<'
,:,j
=r.>
g:'
18
0c-;.'
t
,.j
t
'!6;&
8~
Z 0
013
1131.1
1122.7
~<
\
\
-,
,
,.....,
1141,8
1128,0
\
\
\
I
~"
f
I
I
I
1
,.....,
'l;l""
8~
zg
0""
)
I
\
\"
I'
\
1144,5
"
~
)
1140,4
115.13
I
I
\"
\
\
\
\.
:~
0<
1150,5
1167.0
\
\
\
\,
\
\
I
I~
I
I'
1
i!
-c' I
~ 1'- ---,:;- '.
j" c) .-., >< I \
o . I >--' ~- \
-__J __...... \.__ 'J)
-_...J 0'1 -..
U-':"f: ----,
~".J
C
..
,
,
'!6~
8""
z='
O~
)
\
'{"
.c.
,
\
\
I.
(-
I
I
\
,^:
\.
\
\
\,t
r
\
I
I
r::
~~.J t.
,- CJ
o Ii
- { _n,
,~
h:'ll
,
: --1'~" -. , ;, .
.......l. . ~ \
() '-<, I ,
Cn_ L,! : '\
Uj _.-.j I
rn
,
",:,
\,;
"
p 'r'~~':~~ ~p " -'.!""'-~,',~}_T.,__ ~,vztr'-,-""",,"~~'~':',--::r~-- T
(r)
."1
-0
c
<0
-
"0
'--.)
Q
N
o
"
-
~;
~I'~
~ 11110.: '<: ::
~
i!
1100,2
:; 1101,9
8
II1l
~ 11l5J
11l9.7
'i' 1129.4
8
11.17,3
'i'11
8
1150.
~ 11!2.
~ 11816
l185,
~ 1181,
f 1171.1
8
~ 1lQ.2
Ii! 1189,
8
\)
::0
q]
):..
::0
8
OJ
~
~
a
1n2
1181,6
67.1
1175.1
I1l15.0
<:
..
..
€i
Iii
~
tn--
I...t_
'p
r"1
;C;:,
I,
~
;;;:; ("'),\)
0::0
, ~o
S::-O
"10
::UV)
Or"1
);0
r
t5
- . . ~
-:;.,
---'0"",",,:-"'"'1[""--
U)
r"1
(")
-t
-
o
z
i
s
~'I
"'I~
- 1103.:1~ ::
~
1103.4
~ 11047
I
1"1 ' I
C, ('
=:; ,
:z:
~,--
\
~
~
'"
,~
\'
.,
_1__
..,.l- \.
l'
'f
en
'-.1
-'.
m
o
Z
en
t
\
't<'o
\
t
\
~
\
,"
r
\;-
\ G"l""
::UX
0-
~ ~gj
I o~
,~
f
,~
G"l
CD
o
c::
2'
o
~l
I
1100-3
! 11072
Il1n8
~ l1t1.0
t1t6,1
'i' 1119.5
8
1124,0
~ 112!8
11.l5')
f 1145.2
8
11618
~ 111I.8
121X1.1
~ 12019
1196.5
'i' 1181,2
8
189.5
~
ill l1!l!l,O
8
c:
..
Plotted' 09/06/02 10'02,57 I S,\ProJects\1003- Ir'1Ocal \SITE -PLAN-ND-3\SHT -6-SECTS.clwg
"-0
::o::u
~~ lv
2:0' r
OVl '
8 I
',"
'-
r"1
r-
...,
,.;:
~
I
r
I
~~:'. '"
, 1
,...,. .
__ 4 ..1
I '.~'
~:~:;j. ~
.;...
...
00
tr'
,,[,"
,..,,__-.,,1'1:.-
" 'F';;;
.1 .
, ,
. _ 11
At/O S r
r';"
""
U1
()
:x:-
l:""'
~
0J
o
o
~
(]l
0J
o
.....
:
II
c.:>
o
(j)
o
~
,N
o
1:111
..
;..."
-
i
0"
~~u
~"
[Tl0
::Utn
0[Tl
);0
r-
I !Q'
t r;:j
,(
...,
r,
".,
,.;:
-
-
'-
">
r'
\
it
€i
. CW:-'H_ ,- r~-:''''Y"~~'<'''''~-~' --~..' <j.,'
U)
r"1
(")
-t
.. -
"0
Z
..
N
$
,i!i
"u
."
,
. mi
,0
,
.-t
i.
",
,
.._.1
\!,
"
:\
r
Ln
" ,
G"l-o
::0::0
00
C-o
~&i-
r"1
o
,...;
i!i
jj ij
-t" -.,.
~--
+
G"l""
::ox
0-
c:gj
~ ,52
\' G"l
:~
r
I
/'...
.
t
r
: I
i~
"
F
\
\
'\
...,-2 Y:r ii,- '" '
8::J C X 1\
'- , ~.:. G :. \ --~
~-~, -.. i~,-'
0'1'0
cD
;;:;
oS
o
~
~
lt612 .
lt57.7
~11<<l5
N
lt34,2
~ lm5
V<
lt41,5
~ 1134,9
-I>-
It]l,4
J,
~1126.4
()1
m!l.3
~ lt13.8
0'>
mal. -<----.,
't-, -'>-"-:'r:'r'" .'-'~'"",,,:, -~,,\:"<9"7'~'
U)
~
.. -i
"0
Z
-<
!~
,"
~
8
=
'"
o
~
t
'-7"'" -;,... ."C-'. -~'''y~~'''''''''''''''''''''7'''~.'-:- ,. ~T~~;'
=
'"
o
'"
o
. ';'c'I'!V-'fJ'" ,
"...~ ~__J ~ ~-:-~:! ~
II :,;j '.; ':\'~
. ~,' ft C'; >-:>>-0
ex,:",' ~ ;", ~2~
-. -~~,!:. 'l>""t):
--~~' ~ OJOO'
,I c:r"1tn.
'0::- -Zr"'1
t~5-1CJ,
Z
G"l
J
f
''/
f
I
"
i
f.~
/
!
~~ ;'"
::00
_V),
<:r"1,
~~
-<
.,
'.
I
I
F'
~ ,
'~ f
G"l:'
2l \
'~-~, "
-'L!
\
" f
8;g 'I '
~,~~
rT1Q' .
::Utn r'"
0,."
);0
. r
I
'11
r
I
r
i
~r
I
r
",
,
!Q
r;:1
...,'
r-
...,
,.;:
-
-
,'f.
.
r
I
f
I
f
I
r
I
.
"
I
,
\
~ 11119,6 '
""'-J .....---. -
I
111199
-11119
(Xl
maD
(()
N11lt,5
o
N m19
~
mal
lt1a3
mH
"
,
,
,
I
. "I
-1
I
!
I
,
i !
,
--j
"
,
0'
o,"tl-'
~::o
s::~
[Tl0
::Utn
Or"1
);0
r-
!Q
M-
J
"
...,
r-
r"1'
";:'
t'"
o
o
;.'>(
\ .~
f.
, *',
. ~, ! :,t,
4l:t
! h:
1114.7 .....:...l,lt~
, I
:,.-e
. '/f
\
N lt21,O
N
',<
\
\
I
,?,~, - '
(',C" ~,'_ \
-.. ::t.: 'T'l .
-I.'.'.. Q?S ; \.
" '\ c "
'_,," . J. I \
r,j ~f!-.
en r"-'
/
f
I
,',
~,
,
'-!
"
, ......
,
~
..r.
'---""1';
U)
r"1
~~
.. -
"0
~ Z
~~
:5~
~
g
ii!
jj
-., ...-'*
-"j
.!!.. ~ i ~.
i:: ',-. ,i, f/
:I'- ' {
"
I
I
--n'/ ,..
',.;:to""tl
-00"'1
:-t:i;:~
~~~o
_z
5-<
z
G"l
..~-~
j) . -
o
~ l!!it
)
{,
/
L
r
--.--
~'
>
1177.0
;::; 1-184.3
8
l'
\
"
\
I
{
I
r
l1l11l3
"
-.-1._-- ... ~
.
...,
r-
[Tl
,.;:
...
00
~ 1183.6
I. ,.
I<
'.
l1n4
i lt~)
,i:,/~
, ,
I
305'\
STOR\ .,
11n1
f
\
...
~ 11115.2
- I
F,
1185,4
I
I
."1'"
I
f
,
f 118;6
8
:~
"- I'
Ilc.
r
L
,-
;
!,
,
I ) \;
1llI6-2
::::ltt19.2
8
, .
:j
l'
"
11lll,O
"
, .
lPi
, If
ag' ". \
'-..w
i 11S1
\
:?
r
I
,"t
A~OIS r
,Ot
11!125
::0"
o~
C'1J
2:0 I
'o<n .
~ .~
r
'i' !It.l.4
8
,?
r
I
I
f
,
..
'"
/
I
.f
p
,."
:<;
-
-
...
00
..~
1191.7
!i'l1181.7
8
...,
x
Vi
::;j:
2:
C)
G"l
::u
o
C
2"
L..
I
{
1174,'
"
\
\ '
-.j
f
\
'" I1l15.2
8
!
\
\
'l
11!11.7
I
f
'll1ll1l0
8
I
,.
r
I
/-~
r
1170,0
lC 111lt,4
8
r
.l
",'
\--);>.
au
.L"1\
O~:"5 r\
c: ........,
l"--.J
'"
(~~ 1
...
, ,
-!;
[;j
,
.+- -,-
,
...
. -- ::-'~'-'''t.,.'H,." ,-'.
;:l
oS
'\
';'-1
1--,
t
,..
, .
"""';':~".~-~"'-"""'",!:., .",~" :_~.' ~;r:"-'""'""" '''''',' :-';:' '".-~, ''f'I ,.
~,~
~I~
~ lO!l!lJ'<:
~ 1129,0
~ 1134.B
~ 11~6
i 11611
~ 1tn.9
~ 118'/,4
~ 1175.2
! 11 1
~ 1149.2
~ 1168.0
112110
I1ltl
1140.1
1158.4
1168.1
I1l15.3
1183.0
1lQ.2
1154,0
1149.7
11727
.i~ii ~, t5
'8
,\--' CD'
" ~~' ,
i\ . ~!u
\; 2~
,/
'\
\
'""
r
f
f:'J1
,."
~ ~
-
9
8
0'-0
0::0
~-o
",,0
::uv>
a8
>
r
!Q,
r;:1
\
r
\
r
+
o
r ~
/
r
\
U)
r"1
(")
-t
.. -
"0
Z
..
~..
i!i
,
L
,...,
x
-,ti)
=:;
;z
G"l
>C>
::0
..
j--- ,.
..
: -l,
~.. )
\
,
f
r
.. ",
"I 1
,1
'="j': ...,'
,,3 __. .:'
:;:J := ~li;~:
,,...,1,,,,,\ ".
~,s, l~t::l ;,.
. "
D "B
'~ It-_'.'
:. -~.....,
Ln
1~'
30.5\
~g
6:<;
o
":'i~~,:.'.,: .
:=.'J'll~;' .
=,=
'81 11H'; ,
j j "!
~I~ ~ l~
..' -'r~!' I
"
....
-.,1
I. lj',
~'"
~ f'>'
""", ,
'P:.
.~ {
,
r
r
I
F
",
~
(" Vl
::;j
2:
G"l
\ ~
o
C
z
o
yJ
r
\
\
ii!
jj
t-
.
.---_.'~ .. -.... .-
r
f
I
I
r
I
f
I
>
;:s
~
-<
!':'
Ul
r-
~
...,
o
...,
r-
...,
~
-
-
0>
N
0,
...
~
..
"
~-r r-'- -- \
~:~ .!~~ i~ :',~:,' ~.
';'A" t
C") '-1 r~1 -.j
~
>(,.7""~r" '~"",'-; '/"L'
- ~ .!
,
~ Il!to
~ 1181
'i' 1184,
8
~ 118'/
~ Iii
~ 1l62.
!L' 1164.9
8
~ 11
~ 1151,4
'~-""'-',~~' '~'",-;- . '":"';'"'~\"""!",,,~'?,C:-"""'!I;i''''l~n'~< ~'-rF.-..: ',"1-7.,4'1:~""'':'"P'~'-''~;:'I'':~'''''''
U)
r"1
(")
::j
=0
Z
..
~..
~
::: '1 ,;,; I;.,. 'f.' '
.. S "'.'J' ->,;.. "' _,
l:::).....' ,.1.
~~!,e,:' ~
d.:,~ lil '\
11912 ',~"._ g;~:>>:o
. ___ !;.: : to:::O
, .-<<-0
r >-0
/<DOO
'r-[Tltn
,,",,21"'1
S-iCJ
Z
C)
'&
I
. '/!'
" l
Ilf',.:- f
'" ~b
~
;:l
a
\]
l>
~en
a
aim
bn
-i
'1'"
184,4
..
"1'--
11619
, ~
,! - f'
\
-.'\'.:
11
f:'J
~..
u~'1..
r"1
'r ~
2'
C)
I ~.. _. . ."
. F ~..i
~
-
-
...
00 ."
,or
"
r
.' t j
:.. ,t:.
IIl11i
"
1186.
~
1-
r
I?
r"
,,-. "
_~'~ 'i~
--to-
~'
,
"-'''r
ii, IF1
..l
Ii!
"",
,,'rT.
I ._. ~ ..:.".:1.
At/OIS r
,01'
1175,)
/
r
,..
r
~,
~ _ _ I
1--.
nil.
~ F
~
r
'I
~~
\ :
r
I~,.
:1f .
~"
r"1
:' -- ~-
.!! ::;j
, 2:
C)
G"l
::0
ft' ~-i
o
I; ~
(
-- j-
_L
'f
- -, --.-...
--..../
"
- -~. .
lm.l
l1SU
, JO.5'
f. STORY,
L
t
~. -- ~--
~;
f:'J\!
",\
~.
~ ~'
.'
'i' 1164.1
8
11)4,
~ 11!2.6
o
>
, ,;:S
0.. ,~
I. , -<
~,
>
p:
'1
,
-
, -"
l1S1
~ 1167,0
.J
~
.
)~
w~~: "'1'7. ....,r--.
/ -
J" -,
.- I
0:J '
X- !
V' "
"
,
.-.'
f
"
~.
---
<
'---"-
OJ
1"'-
'-i.~
l"-'J
.
-ie'
Q
,,'
0,)
,'(D
"
, .'-;:
':..,
"
/v
, ~
) I
,;:/~
''1----
c:::::' ...:--,
l-
LT100+0l
---
c/
en
"--
I'
'----j.
. '-(
, - .
,-
JJ
~'-'
Ll.1
en
~
U
Ll.1
/
~I
L
---
,.
'I
, ~-" .
.-...-
,-
,~'
> !;l
N
/
.~.,
~
~
-;
~
o
."
~
-
<0
g ::e:
t(5-:-:--f~
O'>rog
~3
~~~
0'> <= =
-n
rr1 S=' =-
r- ro
(J V>
Q..c;)
. :::::;...::."""
.Q=
_':::3 0
c.o -0 0
550c:::L
r:::::5" c..o I
<.0 r-v
O'>"-"'(/)
1 <.D c::
~==
Cii ro
..., =
=--
><
'''J'!''- ";-"'":"" ,.,....,.,.".~ - ~-"~'-".
- -, -~ ~ -, ""~'J'-~
~ -~ "i~~V""""'"~'--"" .,~ -,' '-;'l!" '-p"'<' - ',"" ~
.-. :""?"
- ,T"""7-.-!.tr'.-ryr...."..~~~-i""lJ':
, -___<:'.-;,~" '"""'.~'- ._Tn.. ~~., ..<::'t~ .-.,,~.
.~. < ~ T,
, '.
". - ..,..,.~.-'1r.'~~~ll!"'~.~.''"lIr..,.~.:,.-:.',1t~"...,..p ''''''~'!;''''M>~''-~~'!II'/~' "~...~"'!I";~"":...lY,..~'~~ :':r.,-~."" "~....~""~';"\I~.~~,~~.-..;...._,,,,'"..? ""'I"' I\"V-"'~~'~ ~1~V'.':""~-7'lj)l:'r.~''<)''.'"!''''I'''', ~~~
\
'y' :' ) "";f \
, u.t." . .
G~ '1
, J
"'~<~.j /
-::: '/
>1,' "",-
/' ,.",,)
~ ~ -){
L
'0
I'
10; 0,50%
,CJ1...,
"c"":..~--~--':t ~.-
, ,.
,'\. '
---~-- - -
--iRfTAlNfN(;""'iN.L --
'-~---------- -~--~- ---~----~
, \ '
-..., I \ '
-..., \ .... I
" I ---- 'I
~ '_____.._.__---- ----.. I 0 ....-----"""__. 1_
\ '-- ----,~ -.---,..--, -Fry -1"J1"PfF'f[=-:i---
. ---\.. --------.----- \ - -r-t---,'< [):-'" j
',~~~~-.~--:-~~\-~- <'\~~' ------'-----:;-:---)\;1 B -'TIE1t2~ f4~,
? \, ('? -1 \ \ !} : \
~ " 0) ,'I L
\ l...... \. ; ,
\ .
\ 'r.' \
..' 0::-:::
....,
cO
/
I,
! I
i
, IV'
, 27' .
~
\ 'I
"
'&~'tJ
... /......, Qj~
. ORAl . .. ' ( ~ X''tJ I
I' / ~ '- '"$,';;;r;j \
. ,"--'>., '., .^'>i' "\.'
If----------- , ~. ~ .............'. ~ "
'1 " ',;j: '.' 1'<:;- '~" ': " "
I ", -"..~I/o ., ',' '\.
< ",..to co . ~ '
I i----~-----" '\
\ I: 1\ /
\ - I: \~I";'---' i
\ -; 1 -r, 1
", ": Ii' I I ~ ~o_ \
l''t, '\t\/ ,I~~~ , \
': '\ \1' I \ I ;~; , )
" I I I ~ is''' :;
~: I,' II I \~, ;'
-,--,' ..'. ,,'; \ t II'~ /
-~~"< ',', '
- t".", ' :''---..:'. i r .' / , " .
-, VJ6q, ,- ..' I' I
t"-'J "', \
'-l":' -, <::::::" \ '\ I \ I I
l"-'J 116', -- -- \ 1
CD < \ -:-~~: - j I
\1\ I I /
I \ \ h I, (
x -ie~ \ \ \: 1,\' \ L \
! --'- \ ,I' \ \
. ,_: .\ \ ~\ ""--'.
:;....-, '11,)---'" y_\ _ __ I , ..., '""\
~---------.,\--\ \ j I I ' \
\ \ '\' l I
", \ \ I' I
': \ '\1\ t
"I, ',\'
~. \
t
. 1\ \ /
1\ I, '\
,I I
\ : \ I I \ ",.......J ---=<,--"
.)1' \
I I .,
,.;7 ~ F{>, . \ I,'"
y ._____~ Q;r---------t : I \
j " 'T') ", ,1'\ I \ ,
,~~_~~~~()I --',:==.::--,-- I. \ .
-- -J.' \,J~ - . I
.,-,," , -P/)/ . \ j I 1- '\, /
\c.'............ \....;'-0 . 11 '..... /
\ l"-'J Q1 . ,\' ,I ,~
l"-'J CD ,\1 \ \
. L L il I I I
I' t"-'J --'- l"-'J', 'kl I \ I
/. to \1'
0:J l
) I I ~
,.I \ '\ ",/
'I \ 1\ /
/ I . I I \.----../
, ,I I
I 1
_ "', I I
--~~------------------I- II I
I 01 /
I I /
1 'I //,/ / ,')
I ,/--~- / ,/ / //
, I I ' ---/ /
I. I I / ./ ,,,/ /
I I ! / ,/' /
I I f -'.---/ /.
I 1~1~1 .-- 1-- . //
I "r I ,/ 8 / " . //
L "" ! I ' / ....-// ~ -- ------ /~
I I ------/"----.--.:...----1- -+---' --ry~-- -~~--~--~~.-;
~~ . . / .-
.--..:..-....--------.-----.;-1-..... __ _ __ _ _ __ _
~I \ ' I ,/ f
e/J~~- r'6,/'\7 ~\g\r~. -.' /;/"/'/. ~"'-=:':~=""' -';,~~;,:..~" /~;::/~;/ '" f~J/ rxdo'''' ;J+1< - i~
.. 1- \ '7\ < -,(j J- . ,'/'11' //~---=-, -===--=-~-=- ='::'\ \\'1 \':'" :,~: :,::-// /---,/~ -'II, \: - ~ f.:! j ."u".-1 r..J -, -'-,
C r-69 -(II-', , " / / f /---.----.----- ',,'/, /' <"(J)(J) "'-j e EF jJ/f7Sr- 8fN
(J ',' I /, '-........ ",-. \," ... :r: /T]
'c >!~. ! I~ / / ,//J _.=-:'-: ~. /"\ I -;/T] B . f!-~68r=Zf- ~:fJ
, , ,"" . / -/ ;':".-" -- \ 1 (, (J) ,/ .
I / r 1 ([(_n_~___j:':8 g (
I -;~
=do
'-..---2
(J)
__,J~
---
r. '-...,
<
F'F:..." 53 0
~. '. )~
~-
q'.
-<\'0
.('"
'"
FF =490
n
",'
,
"
" ~ i;:,
.IN "
f "':"1'.
~j.J' ~30' \
- -- ~. .\\, .. .
, . \
/
,
','" '.., "-
'f\
FF>oSSO '
\,
\
\
~o
..J .~
"
'f
-', /
N
-
~v""'~"
\'
,''? "G>
'I,
~'
\ :
f
j I~'t -j'~'
, '~"'54.6 \",.1 i"
\ 16' : .
....~O' -.. '. -'___ 76,S" '..
~- 'I ""'-=.:.--. ~.
'0 ---........... '
o
':,c -"4." ~ \.
J / ~}~\ ,I I;;
\- .0 .... ", .~'~~ ~~
DIU/I'/i- Jf] ;,)~ 0.
J0 ' 0 J.ro,
'''"'.\ D;--..\,0d/
'I -C;/\/<::'J- J'
it: YU j\
,S; /
I'~
,
'"
.}
,
',' ~ ' If
CP "
~./ '
<' '{ , .' C' ~ ,
1'. ,
I,
, ,
\
"
/.
'"".
. !
I:
, .,..Q, 50%
--.::....
J"?
,"\-.l>.,..,..
"
I' '
"
. ~:
,
t:- . j ...
/,
/
"
"'.9
S
- - --
--
10%
'~,
o~,
o
o
. ,'~
'. '
!i
, " f-
~ to, . .-, 0)
I ,'.,..,_ ..
.; \. '\, ' . /'" ,:'..-
~~ .~......' 1
, 1
OJ
'~
II
...
"
ex,
! [~>
,
"~
J.. -- , A\....O .
~':'\' " ,<1':'5' /
': . I lr; /11!7u
,0
..r~
." ..,., "
/ ~ I" 'r~ '
..;., .
,.
,
I
\
. ,I Fr"'5J.O
,.,-,
- \ Fr""SJ,O
,
'.t...
"
I r:-- .;.:
..Jl......Q..:~.-:-. '\'
,
,,-,-. ,~- . ','
, '~'
\
, ;f )'~
::::!
" 1 "
. ...
, .""
,'"
"
.
, ~'I
\,
> " '\.
"
:r
/.'
'.
~'" ;
,
,
\.. '
I;
'r
, ..'
i,
i
.
'-,.J
"
.,,.l "
'i
if
, /
C
'-!':~
~<S
< "-,
,;:.
"---- .
.'
. ,
.:;1 ,
\.
.n
(, -'-
":f-.:.,,,.
"'-
:\., /'1
/
/
. /
'.
~..--,..rr.,.7'- '\'
/'
I
,
)
I
I
/
(
I
, , if,'
18'DRAJ~~'p,PE
I
I
-H
W~
.')>
c:..> r-
......
,~~
m(fJ
(fJ"
'~
--
\.
'\
\
--../
//'
,/'
!
FF~47.8
'.
I
, i
/
/
/
/
/
I
I
\
,
I
I
_/
. .~--
I
'\ / ,
. ,-....
"
, ,
, \ I
, ,
\\
\\,
\> ,.-.
!
I
1
I
i
, \
\
\
\
\
I.
\
\
\
!
,
'8"
,
'-.,
00+61.
/
,
(
/
I
/
f
,
;'
/
I
/
I
)
/
,(',- ",;,.
~) /I-
/
/
,"->
'. ----'
-//
~.
,~
(W
'"
m
+61
......
~
o
~
, ,~ .-Jl..
~~~--.....
. "
G:J
(J'J
"
/,
~~Q.- .~
1"'1 ;;0 Vi i
_:~ ~"
,
" .~>
~I
~.
0>
"-
- 1 ~ .
.- -
-----
~,
)> ,
~- '.,.
), <:1) ,
~ :...
......
1/
V
/'
/
/'
,
'"
j //' - ~~x
, .. ,.~~
. v ~ii1~
8C:'
,.9ffl
o ?;
-:' 7"
/
(
/
" ,
I
i
I
//
!
,
IN
1-;->
1
,
I
..'
!
~
,/'
00+01:
00+&\
,0 TgV
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
,/IN.)}
( ,\
\~- '.
~"'" ~ r~
'.~ "';
-...,
'.,
,.
...
'"
U'
l"-'J
Q'J
,
/
/
/
/
/
I
//
,
-)
/
/
; \
I ,
\ \
\ \ ~\
\ \~ '"
~ '",
\ ,........ ~:
"". '"
'. "-"
, '
~
\
)
..
"
,
'" ,
:;:. ,
g;.
" '"
,
"..
//
/
/
-f /
0/
c:..>~
" r-
~O
)>"
am
:;02:
m(fJ //
(fJ "
>- '
hV
/
/
/
'. \
\
\
\
'.
"
\
\,
"
\
\
l"-'J
l'Q
.... Of'G)\
-rj \
o ~ II \
()~'-
(/) rrJ ~ IIc'O
-.,~......
~
:.....
~. ?
,
I,
/ I
( ~.
I "
I ~~
" ~,
""
,+ I
g,
\
\' \
\
! ...
II::
~
~
a
\
\,
/
-0
:::0
ra
):>
:::0
t9
-tV)
o
G)z
~~n
)>o~
ZZ-i
G)IC
1)>
r
~,..,,""~~-., I
o. 0 -:::0 I"'T"'I
oo<..n~ 10 '-f
t.N_oorr1~~Z
~ Z IZ (J1 ("")
N "o-lOO-i-::r:
(J1:r:: ;::oIZ s::::::
C}----tf'Tln )>
"ZOCD~~:I:_:I: ::::u
I ~fTl=;:;~~[D^
_U> OV;rrl;:O
t.H(f)r;:1;:O-l;::O:>
I 3:Zr'1(/)(/)
roO -:::Orrl{/)
NViR:l>C(o
---AC-C:: ::jo
~ 0-
"'S;:i!~z~
'C.lc: ~o",
_zo~C)"'--I
z- >
o;:O;:O"Tl~
o:z)>>:::o~
o(/)~ZOrrl
zo....-nzo
l>::r::::oI--I-t
::OOOO(F) I
~f2?~~gj
r I
CD~O"'~OO
G;oi-vO -
""'"T1~~?Z;u
08;=5>0<,
"Tl""''''''''?2ri'1
~~z5?zQl
:J> 00("")0
G') ::0 Irr1
--1--1--10
"'Uf'T1Io (")
0""'" (')~
r-~~--I)>
~ .;J(.~~
o 0
"Tl~-;:o
CJ--IO~:ZO
~::r:Zrr1j;~
af'TlC);O C
=--~ "'::0;::
o ~~o_
:::! 0-1>
C)::o-o
>0-
-oC)z_
0> .
r 00
!"1 "Tl
<\
"
Z:!lg
'::1F=.....
'"
x
'1J
!il
-<
...
><
~
t:I
(D
<ll
(D
-
o
'tl
B
(D
l:t
,...
, I I
-0
l>
=1:1:
o
o
I
o
-
-i:'
o
:-<
~c......
oo<O~
-.t..._
N_...
00,-"",
f>r>n
:-<:<:<
II::
~
III
IQ
(D
B
(D
l:t
,...
""
<::>
CD
r->
<:>
C3
N
en
...
o
I:l
~
-
~
a-
n
.
Plotted' 09/05/02 18'48'08 S,\ProJects\1003- IMocClI \SITE -PLAN-ND-3\SHT -4-SITE -6-11dwg
/-,.1 I
, I
I ~ I
t g I
~ ,I ~ ,~
, '
I I
Ll
, as ~:>Ii I
I l lWtS YJS I I
\~" '1':1 ,I
, . ; I 1 I
':< 1~:- -:-~_j_
/,;:-..:.1: + Q~U!DalWo)S-I--
// I ~ I .y, 6u!lsI'] ,
(r: It t I
I.~ I I
'" ' I
II", 1 i I
I~ '11
I, I
. II ! '
! 1;1 ('I I
--:J.., ! (') " I
,< < 0::0
\ 'zo I
. J z'U
"'0 I I
: ~~ I &,
.~o T '+' I
I} I i
1'1' ",t
"''1''< I
I" q::ii I
II ;:~ I
I I -;;f" ,
~,~IM. i
ell ACCESS lJRl'I[lIl\Y I
. --:+---1 I
. .9. 1,91 , t
: ,
, '" I
r' ~ I
I I
hl j ~
i ~ I
18 I
.00 ;
.,.~- :~. :,...; 1:1tH i
, 1M, 119ll/I:):JlI ' I I '~:
: : !;V'9l+lS YJS. I '
, ;.; '\' 8l I
.', II ',r? I
"'1 , I
, . I
00 01 I I J;
1 " ! I
, ,
\\' 1 II;!
, ! ~ 1<0
; 111~ :~
I()'I j I'
I :':~, j' ,; ~
L ; I IV)' 'Iilia
',I' ,.I;~ ,'ll~
t. I:i~ t"'+ ,-
'13'
:~ ? ,
i! ~~ I' J1' k,
II ~~
~II~~ i I I
~I' ,
i: :1': 1'~" ';1:
J /')11 ;~, I
. 0 1,1 '0 1 I,
? ; :I:(~' -+ 0\
\, 8 :i:1 ' :~ 'I 81 1\
J ~ IWc: ~ ~ <0 I
.Ii, Vl""tl"~il I 1 ' 'I
,'~~/III O~~ll f.l ,'--1'
. ....SlII ;0"" I I ,:
- ! /~ ~ 1,1 ~ 11 I \\1
r llll )> 'I; I ,I
,II:: ~ II ' ! fj :' i
'Ii IU :::
t ~ I I
, 8 I .,
~ ~t+l2, : I'
C l ACCESS DRM.'WAY ,
I'~~ .',
~ ",
- ' ~:g I '/
1 ~Sij 1 .
r-O ,. i
>:d
'~I'
.~
, ,
,
<'\( /
'"
(
J~
. I~
: 131 I ~1~5:','n' ~,.
I .
, /15' '16.5\'j
""---' ---
,,"
---j;
-..~ --.
, .
,
r-~ ,1'"7",'.. ; /-~_.:p;. ,
Eo. 1ft ~ : e:
?~~611~i
fT\ ~ I ....
L ~ II ~"
II '
,(." g II ~'
1:-. i I
~ I
I
I Ii'
1
~ I;,
I
-,
"
-'..-,. - ',-. ~}
, r
,
c'
1
'~ ~
- " '/' ' ,
<,
,_I ~ _._~.
I ~ '
, .
-:1\',
,
('
~"
}. (....
I'
."
,
, ,
"
FF=46.8
.'
"
1- '<.. . _., ~.....
'"
'"
~
,,\l,~
4:~"'l
\)\.- ,
i I
1- _ ~ .
, "
L__.\
] '<-l-, ,'>" ::.i'
l >~ '~CA -' ') 1 n
"// Ul ~
,~ <n
1/' en
, ,
,l' I
__ ,__J
II
...-, . ,,-~,.;", -.'
"
'I'
!!~
jq
, 10"
!
,j
,.J~:~
t..., /0
-'I ~"l; - - j ,
,
" .
! I i
" I
,\\
!"-,'_"r,~,,.
., ,
"
_~ _U'"
~ io> '
i kn
, /0
I"'"
I,
.;1 ~
.1'
,-
,
FF%47~1
i.
...
.-
,
, '
,
L /
'1
t.>
.... .
i. '
, '
" "<,
/
"
I'
,.."
/
,',
: ".
/"'.1
~. -_.!..
I'
.,'
C,I
,\v, r:;:'
,~ ,
-<,\OJ'' ".
<' .;
,
,.
'^
;,.
I,'
"
L",
u
o
~ 11"6'
>;!s
'. "'{,-Z'
. .,
, ,
I
II
:01
~~zJ
I
1~
..._L_ L.- '
I ..
"
,
I
/
/'!
-' /
I
i
,
L..~_
~
,0
.^~
V)
,
~ t "':~
.'"
r -: ' ~ ,;, I
-..,..'"~ Y') 4 ' ,~_._~ _. !_
. ~, .~ r L -;;'J
I
,
. ..L..
'L"
\
I
~'U
...."
,,0
::I:~
Ul
~8
Ir""!'
I I
I
-- ~: .
,
'.' )
.;"_ n'.J
\
///
,
~
'"" ~
-
+
8~
./
,)
_. _1--
"
'-.
....
~,-'-
~. +- ---- .
, --------
\
\,
'::-:---- /\
. .
:\'
1':'
--
-- - ---
"->
".
-........~------::--~---
--'"~..
~
--=
~-----
~-
- ~............. ~. .,/
--. ---~_:-~
~
-----~---".
, ,
"-
..
1 \ (
'"
\ j~' ?fl~
-;~
m-
p-~
'iF
//<:s c. :' ~ ~
..... I 0,'
..... :'''';0)> ~
\ 10f'Tl II .....
I 0 ~ ---. '-v
.0>.......
,'-; -
.,,,-, ......
I:;';'V~
I ',(,1'f
: \
,k!
Ir~G
I /(~
.
,',
L>~ '
2;1 SLOPE
I
I
I
~ ""U
O>~ )>
. (/) 0
0.., .....,
o > "-'
Oc II
(/);u ......
-.,> ......
zC)
..,ex>
~:"..
...
'10, ...I.
'"
f,
~ '
,
.L__
\r\ .
;;;,
c;; .
- ,
,
- - - .;;,;:1
I 1 ~~';
: ,. I II I
\:-:-:-...',..-:::-.......',"','.'-:;:---:<:. 'I'
02, '
~ '
, '"
I
---;7
I -:'. ~"I:'
CO
!
1
I
; l
,
,
~ ' -
I.. I
J
CD
:Vi
! -~
,2
,"
\ Xl
: ~ I yr-
, "';- -" ,
..'........,.,:::..'..:.:..<?1:.:.::::...':::::
..
Xl
i . j'
1- ' .
~" I..
,~
i',
.,
<" ,
., '
,1-
~!
,
I,
CO
- ,
CD
I'"
1
:1
\
,
OO+ll
~l\'!~
'f; ,
<d
+J
8
""
i
~~......
Xl
-'
CD
~
,
,
~ i
~J
'f, ~~ _~qfb.
'"
~rn
-
-
Q
'"
-
- -
Ii'"
,
.:-
"
~
021
I" .
, I
I I
, ,
[ I
t ~ I
, I
\ I ~
~ I
\ I
'\ I
1\ ,
't\i !
il ~
II I
-. 'I
/r-~+ I
, ' . ~~ '11
:j 0: !I' \ I
, (~tS"t03Si~ ! \ I
i v/ ~'~+~ YJSfli \
,I ' II. \
<> , '
. \ I I
i I +
! J i ;"" " II.
( 'j ~ 1,11
n~ U
~..
8&: '
~+ I
o~
^
,.
;;;1
~I
'"
I i Clq
~ ----
~~~...- --
-~~,
. I
I I_
I ..
,1'1 . II
*~
I \
,-
~/..J1(f"1 ~\
... f
~~I
~
'"
;;;
: ~z __:_ ~~
r
~\--
-J_____
~,\ :
: ~ ,
'\
\
--r- --
!
.~-~~~l=: ~.-------r-!=;-~-/;~
'f.w~ :t4. ~1;;'a'
~
"!
""-:.,
,
-----~
.--:_----
--
""U
)>,
O'l~ 0'\'
. O:r:
25 ~ 11.1
00 ~ 1\
f'Tl...... \
(f)~..... '\
? ~"
c
nT"iTl rrrTnl
\-0
\ )>
(JI--'''CJ
o,~
O'TJ II
00 ~
(/) f'Tl ::::::
-.,~ .......
:J..
+
o
o
~ "
L
.~- .
, .....,
--------~~----
___._~___~,l"-_____
I -3::-0
I ~OJC
I -f rq
_1 - . ~,."
I -- "---_ ....:-;.." Vl
N I O"FJ-?:
~ <.OU'l-;~~-- ---
+ ---- .....-~l rs~t ----...
g 1\' ~
I ..
I \ .'.!I:-
: .-' f '?
1 riJ ~ ..;......J
t-' 0',
"""-
'~~~-------~--
... '
I'.,
, ....
~, "........
, , ----
I
"1\: ,',
': I ;
" 1
: I
l' -
I ;~"
~,
--........
'''-:., ,
, ,~', "..
-J
F) .
o
-<
,I
"
l
'I
\
';,
'"
i
," .
, .
,
i
/
I"
,
fl
1\
,-----~
...
I
,
,
I
\, t ~, -,
,
lO"Z+~JSr-
,
I
,
+
,
I
,
I
,
t '"
+
, 8
~"
I ~
,
r
I;
,
j
:~
CJ (j')
>0
;:;:l~
'TJO
,'"
00
~'TJ
.. -<
~O
C"
rO
-<I
00
- >
- :z
<C:)>
<C r
00 -<
-<
o
>
r
"
I
o
-<
o
G')
;;lJ
:)>
;;::
;;::
",
-<
::0
o
(j')
(j')
",
;;lJ
:5;
o
",
(f)
~ \1
I >
II ~
\ ~~
1\ a~
I \ ~ ~
I \ ~
I \ ~
\ \ ~
I'.J
II
I'
I' :. II
II
II
II
I j
II
II
\I
I
I
t>1
~
o
o
"
;U
>
'U
I
()
(/)
()
>
,
f'Tl
t
~
o
00
o
,
""
o
"
"
'i !
'i I
I ,
;d:-;",II
, '
I
'. +.
:1: I
~ . f
':. :1
,: 1
, I
,
I
,
'I
I
f
I
I
,
,
I
I
, i
.,
__J -
,I
I
.; ~
8:<> I
I
i 1 I
I I
! I
I I
I
I
i
. ! :
I i ~',' .'
~.
I
1
,
I
I
I
I
I
'I
-, I
I
,
. ,
'j I
i I
!
i I
, ti.. i
"
I
I
I
I
Y ,
" I
I./) ~. I
, , ',I
:l : I
;, I
'i:
j I 'f I
'j.', I
.~
. j \ ,I
. ..
, '\. ",',
1'1" ..I
; ,; ,,,:' ,
Ii:....
i.1
,I i
i
I
I
,
, ,
: 1
I! I
I I
iI' I
. ' I
j\: !
\ ~ I
'~ ':0 !
'~ i
I
I
:~I !
\ 'I I
\J I
\
~\ I
I
~I
'.' I
.
~