Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout061102 CC Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JUNE 11, 2002 - 7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon pdor to 11:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 11:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to five matters of existing litigation involving the City. The following ca~e will be discussed: '1) City of Temecula v. Riverside County (Tucalotta Hills Associates); 2) City of Temecula v. Riverside County (Domenigoni-Barton); 3) Application of San Diego Gas & Electricity Company (U 902-E) for a Certificate of Public Convenience & Necessity Valley-Rainbow 500 kY Connect Project before the California Public Utilities Commission; 4) Elder v. City of Temecula; and 5) Ross v. Stone. 2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property acquisition negotiations of property located at the northeast corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. Under negotiation is the price and terms of the real property interests. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and Bill Johnson. City negotiators are Shawn Nelson and Bill Hughes. 3. Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957 and 54957.6 with respect to City Manager's Evaluation. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2002-03 Resolution: No. 2002-42 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts R:~Agenda\061102 1 Prelude Music: Micah and Jacob Putnam Invocation: Reverend Howard Brown of Winchester Community United Methodist Church Flag Salute: Boy Scout Troop No. 337 ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Amateur Radio Proclamations Special Olympics Certificates PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be flied with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item, There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. R:~Agenda\061102 2 2 Approval of Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of April 23, 2002; 2.2 Approve the minutes of May 7, 2002; 2.3 Approve the minutes of May 14, 2002. 3 Resolution Approvinq List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2002. 5 Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. 6 Second Amendment to Professional Services Aqreement between the City of Temecula and Kelley Display, Inc. - City Banner Proqram RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Second Amendment in the amount of $1,557.00 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kelley Display, Inc. for the not to exceed amount of $52,057.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment. 7 Adoption of a Resolution extendinq the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Proqram RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\061102 3 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE SERVICE FEE COLLECTED ON BEHALF OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY UNTIL MAY 20'14 8 Substitute Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract Map No. 25892 (located on the south side of Pauba Road between Ynez Road and Marqarita Road and across from the Fire Station) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Accept the Substitute Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for public improvements in Tract Map No. 25892; 8.2 Authorize the release of the existing Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Tract Map No. 25892; 8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. 9 Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Street Paintinq Festival and Great Race Event in Old Town (located at Old Town Front Street, between Second Street and Fifth Street and Third Street between Murrieta Creek and Mercedes Street) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR THE STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL AND GREAT RACE EVENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS 10 Ali-Way Stop Siqn Installation - Overland Drive at Commerce Center Drive RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE R:~Agenda\061102 4 11 Professional Services Aqreement for John WarnedSantiaqo Road Assessment District improvement Proiect - Hvdroloav Study - Proiect No. PW02-07 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $55,400.00 to provide design services for the John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project - Hydrology Study - Project No. PW02-07 - and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 11.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments/change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,540.00 which is equal to 10% of the agreement. 12 Acquisition Aqreement between the City and Claim Jumper Restaurant RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve and execute, in substantially the form attached hereto, the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions between City of Temecula and Claim Jumper-Temecula for the acquisition of certain real property in the amount of $50,000.00; 12.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the document. 13 California Enerqv Commission Grant Applications - Battery Back-up Systems for Traffic Signals RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Authorize City staff to apply for grant funding from the California Energy Commission to partially offset the costs of installing new and existing Battery Back- up Systems (BBS) for traffic signals at critical intersections; 13.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR GRANT FUNDS SUPPORTING THE INSTALLATION OF NEW BATTERY BACK- UP SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR INTERSECTIONS WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED} TRAFFIC SIGNALS 13.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\061102 5 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR GRANT FUNDS SUPPORTING THE INSTALLATION OF EXISTING BATTERY BACK-UP SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR INTERSECTIONS WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) TRAFFIC SIGNALS 14 Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHIN6 THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS 15 Cooperation Aqreement for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Fiscal Years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06. 16 Library Grant Application RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE TEMECULA PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT BUDGET, LOCAL FUNDING COMMITMENT, AND SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS AS REQUIRED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENTS AND LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000 16.2 Approve the grant application for the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 and authorize staff to submit the application to the Bond Act Board. R:~Agenda\061102 6 17 Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2002 and approve the following: 1) An appropriation of $150,000.00 in the City Attorney line item in the General Fund; 2) An appropriation of $50,000.00 in the Internal Service Fund Insurance Fund. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:~Agenda\061102 7 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2002-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2002-03 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 28, 2002. 2 Professional Services Aqreement for TCSD Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Services RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement with PELA, a landscape architectural firm, for TCSD landscape plan check and inspection services in the amount of $60,000.00 and authorize the Board President to execute the agreement. 3 Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda~061102 8 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDING THE ENERGY CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 4 Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2002, and approve the following increases: 1) Increase the Debt Service bond proceeds revenue estimate by $3,684,000; 2) Increase the Debt Service Fund appropriation for refunding bonds by $4,010,000; 3) Increase the Debt Service Fund appropriation for cost of issuance by $179,400. PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Temecula Community Services District before a public Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 5 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charqes for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 02 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, AND SERVICE LEVEL D - TRASH AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~,genda\061102 9 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 DISTRICT BUSINESS 6 Review and Adoption of the FY 2002-2003 Annual Operatinq Budqet RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS 7 Aquatic Schedule - Summer 2002 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Review the Aquatics Program Schedule for the Summer of 2002 and provide staff with direction as it relates to this season's schedule. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\061102 10 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2002-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2002-07 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 28, 2002. 2 Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2002. R:~Agenda\061102 11 AGENCY BUSINESS 3 Review and Adoption of the FY 2002-2003 Annual Operating Budqet RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS 4 Review and Adoption of the FY 2003-2007 Capital Improvement Budqet for the Redevelopment Aaencv (RDA) RECOMMENDATION: a. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2003-07 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2002-03 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 25, 2002, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~genda\061102 12 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL 18 Review and Adoption of the FY 2002-03 Annual Operatinq Budqet RECOMMENDATION: 18,1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS 18.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 18.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 2002-03 19 Review and adoption of the FY 2003-07 Capital Improvement Pro;:lram RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 2003-07 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2002-03 20 Consideration of preliminary steps to explore the feasibility of a City Municipal Electric Utility (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmembers Naggar and Comerchero.) RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Consider the approval of additional staff time to explore the feasibility of a City Municipal Electric Utility, R:~Agenda\061102 13 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\061102 14 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL APRIL 23, 2002 After the Closed Session that convened at 5:30 P.M., the City Council convened in Open Session at 7:01 P.M., on Tuesday, April 23, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts Absent: Councilmember: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Mr. Matthew Fagan. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Ben Wikner of Providence Orthodox Presbyterian Church. ALLEGIANCE The salute to the Flag was led by Boy Scout Troop No. 911, PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Advising that City Manager Nelson, Assistant to the City Manager Yates, and Senior Management Analyst Adams will be participating on a basketball team against the Harlem Ambassador Basketball Team, Mayor Roberts presented to City Manager Nelson his team jersey and informed the public that this basketball game fundraiser for Habitat for Humanity will be on Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at Chaparral High School. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Ms. Kathy Katz, 35125 Calle Nopal, representing the Temecula Valley Garden Club, invited the City Council and the public to the Annual Flower Show on Saturday, April 27, 2002, at the Library, from 10:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M., noting that the admission was free. B. Mr. Tom Stillings and Nannefte, 35595 Glenoaks Road, representing the Lakeside Jazz Club and Nannette and her Hotsy Totsy Boys, invited the City Council and the public to the upcoming Jazz Festival on May 11 and 12, 2002. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Advising that Sister City Voorburg wilt merge with the City of Leidschendam (Leideschendam-Voorburg) on May 22, 002, Mayor Pro Tem Stone suggested that the City of Temecula forward a gift to the newly merged cities to commemorate this special occasion. Mayor Roberts informed Mr. Stone that those efforts are in the process. R:\Minutes\042602 1 B. Commenting on the number of complaints he has received with regard to speeding in residential areas, Councilman Naggar reminded the public that the speed limit in residential areas is 25 miles per hour. C. By way of pictures, Councilman Pratt shared pictures from Spain as it relates to traffic and circulation and recommended that the City invest in four double-decker tourist buses to enhance the traffic/transportation system. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda, 2 Resolution Approvinq List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 02-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Town Association Advertisin(l A(lreement with re(lard to the Frontier Davs Rodeo RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Town Association (TTA) Advertising Agreement with regard to the Frontier Days Rodeo in the amount of $15,000.00. 4 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC, dba Cinqular Wireless - Ground Lease Aqreement RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the lease agreement for a ten year period in an annual amount of $19,200.00, between the City of Temecula and Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC, dba Cingular Wireless for the installation, operation, and maintenance of a wireless Personal Communications Services (PCS) facility at Rancho California Sports Park. R:\Minutes\042602 2 5 Amendment No. 1 to the Library Grant Writinq Services Aqreement RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Library Grant Writing Services Agreement in the amount of $32,000.00 to Beverly Simmons, Library Management Consulting. 6 Sixth Street Property Promissory Note RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE EXTENSION OF THE PROMISSORY NOTE FOR THE SIXTH STREET PROPERTY 7 Harveston Storm Drain Infrastructure - Tract No. 29639-1 - Cooperative Aqreement RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the Harveston Tract No. 29639-1 - Storm Drain Infrastructure Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the City of Temecula, and Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California Corporation; 7.2 Authorize the execution of such agreement in its final form by the Mayor, City Attorney, and City Clerk. 8 Tract Map No. 26828 (located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinqs Road, north of Nicolas Road, west of Seraphina Road, and east of North General Kearney Road) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Tract Map No. 26828 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 8.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement; 8.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. 9 Tract Map No. 26828-1 (located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinqs Road, north of Nicolas Road, west of Seraphina Road, and east of North General Kearne¥ Road) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Tract Map No. 26828-1 in conformance wit.h the conditions of approval; R:\Minutes\042602 3 9.2 Approve the Subdivision improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement for onsite improvements; 9.3 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement for offsite improvements; 9.4 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. 10 Tract Map No. 26828-2 (located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinqs Road, north of Nicolas Road, west of Seraphina Road, and east of North General Kearne¥ Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve Tract Map No. 26828-2 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 10.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement; 10.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Construction Bids for Intersection Traffic Monitorinq System and Traffic Siqnal Interconnect - Project No. PW99-05 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Intersection Traffic Monitoring System and Traffic Signal Interconnect - Project No. PW99-05. 12 Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for Proiect No. PW02-05 - FY2001-02 - Slurry Seal Proiect RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW02-05 - FY2001-02 - Slurry Seal Project. MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 3 and 5 - 12 (Item No. 4 was pulled for separate discussion.) The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone abstained with regard to Item Nos. 3 and 4. R:\Minutes\042602 4 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION 4 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC, dba Cinqular Wireless - Ground Lease Aqreement - Approve Staff Recommendation and direct staff to conduct an appraisal as to what the lease rates are for cellular antennas on municipal property and invite the City of Murrieta and the County of Riverside to loin in this effort and share in the expense of the appraisal (5-0~0) MN/JC RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the lease agreement for a ten year period in an annual amount of $19,200.00, between the City of Temecula and Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC, dba Cingular Wireless for the installation, operation, and maintenance of a wireless Personal Communications Services (PCS) facility at Rancho California Sports Park. Councilman Naggar recommended that an appraisal of lease rates for cellular antennae on municipal property be completed and that the County and the City of Murrieta be invited to participate in the appraisal. MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve the staff recommendation and to direct staff to conduct an appraisal to determine the lease rates for cellular antennae on municipal property and to invite the County and the City of Murrieta to participate in such an appraisal. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING 13 Development Code Amendment (Planninq Application No. 01-0566 - Secondary Dwellinq Units) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Not amend the provisions of the Development Code pertaining to Secondary Dwelling Units. Senior Planner Hogan reviewed the staff report (of record). Director of Planning Ubnoske reiterated previous City Council direction with regard to this issue, noting the Council's desire to address a sliding scale with flexibility with the requirement of a Conditional Use Permit; that the Planning Commission had unanimously denied a Code amendment; and that approximately five propedies have applied for and been granted the permission to build a secondary dwelling unit, limited to 1,200 square feet, since incorporation. In response to Councilman Comerchero, it was noted by staff that the intent of the secondary dwelling units would include housing for family members, students, elderly, in-home health care providers, etc. Questioning why a lot split had not been considered, Mayor Pro Tern Stone noted that he would not view a 2,000 square foot unit as a granny flat. Addressing Mayor Pro Tem Stone's suggestion of a lot split, Mr. Mike Graesser, 39700 Cantrell Road, commented on the associated costs of a lot split and, therefore, making such an option R:\Minutes\042602 5 not feasible. Mr. Graesser advised that his lot is 10 acres and that the two dwelling units are 900 feet apad. Councilman Pratt noted that he would not foresee the placement of two homes on this 10-acre lot having a negative impact on the neighborhood. Speaking in support of a Code amendment, Mr. Ray Graesser, 39700 Cantrell Road, reiterated the costs associated with a lot split and commented on what he would view as misinformation provided to him by the department, noting that the City's departments were aware that the 1,800 square foot residence was being constructed prior to the construction of the main dwelling unit. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Mr. Graesser advised that both a lot split and a variance were explored prior to the construction of the second dwelling unit and that staff had clarified that the second dwelling unit would be limited to 1,200 square feet. Director of Planning Ubnoske provided additional clarification with regard to lot splits and advised, for Councilman Naggar, that Mr. Graesser had received a building permit for the primary dwelling and one for the second dwelling unit with the stipulation that it be restricted to 1,200 square feet. In response to Councilman Naggar, City Attorney Thorsen advised that in order for the City Council to approve a variance, certain specific findings, under State Law, would have to be made prior to approval. Speaking in opposition to the Code amendment, Mr. Ron Knowles, 39675 Cantrell Road, noted that a Code should not be amended as the result of one individual's request; commented on potential impacts, if this amendment were approved, such as rentals, density, traffic, decreasing property value, etc.; stated that a 2,000 square foot dwelling unit would not be a granny flat; and, therefore, encouraged the City Council to oppose the amendment. Councilman Pratt expressed concern with the City Council impacting this individual's investment. Concurring with the opposition of a Code amendment, Mr. Bill Devalck, 39835 Cantrell Road, as well commented on the potential impacts of an amendment to the neighborhood and relayed his support of a 1,200 square foot granny flat. Reiterating Mr. Graesser's understanding of the Code, limiting the granny flat to 1,200 square feet, Mayor Pro Tern Stone relayed his opposition to amending the Code and stated that the City has the responsibility to enforce the Code. Viewing it as inappropriate public policy for the City Council to amend a Code dependent upon an individual's request, Councilman Comerchero suggested that the City Council review the existing Code and determine whether or not a change were necessary, noting that, in his opinion, the Code does not require any changes. Mr. Comerchero stated that the 1,200 square foot granny flat was intended to function as that but not as another residence of 2,000 square feet. Further commenting on Mr. Graesser's situation, Building & Safety Director Elmo clarified that at the time the 1,800 square foot residence was constructed, no other buildings were located on the property; that at the time the second dwelling unit (larger residence) was constructed, staff discussed with Mr. Graesser the need to reduce the living area of the first dwelling unit upon the completion of the construction or issuance of a building permit; and that Mr. Graesser had been R:\Minutes\042602 6 advised that if the Code were not amended, the living area of the first dwelling unit would have to be reduced. For Councilman Naggar, City Attorney Thorson noted that there would be no liability to the City because the building permit was issued with the condition that the second unit not exceed 1,200 square feet. Mayor Pro Tem Stone reiterated that, in his opinion, the City's existing Code is clear. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to approve staff recommendation (to not amend the Code) and to direct staff to work with Mr. Graesser in an effort to create a workable solution to his situation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Pratt who abstained. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS No additional comments. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT No comment. CiTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT With regard to Closed Session, City Attorney Thorson advised that under the Brown Act, there were no reportable actions. ADJOURNMENT At 8:18 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at 5:30 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, for the purpose of an RCIP Workshop. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\042602 7 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MAY 7, 2002 The City Council convened in an adjourned workshop meeting at 5:38 P.M., on Tuesday, May 7, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, and Roberts Absent: Councilmember: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Relaying that a new Metrolink line traveling from Riverside to Los Angels through the 91 corridor had opened, Mayor Roberts advised that this new line would most likely have a significant impact specifically when the new line from the 1-15 Freeway is set up. B. For informational purposes, Mayor Roberts relayed that approximately three weeks ago he sent a letter to the San Diego Union Tribune in rebuttal to the letters that the Mayors of San Diego cities had signed which urged the construction of SDG&E's transmission.line; relayed that the letter was not printed in the newspaper until today (after significant editing), May 7th' which was coincidentally the day that the San Diego Board of Supervisors had on its agenda the recommendation to take action for approval of the SDG&E line in Riverside; and advised that the another coincidence was that one of the Supervisors in San Diego was also named Ron Roberts. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1 Ninth Workshop for the Riverside County Intearated Plan (RClP) RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and file. City Manager Nelson advised that the County representatives would provide an overview of the RCIP with a focus on the circulation elements and traffic impacts of the General Plan, and introduced Mr. Richard Lashbrook, the RCIP Project Manager. Mr. Lashbrook proceeded with an overview of the General Plan, the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and a focused presentation on transportation issues, highlighting the following: · The hearing schedule for the County's General Plan, inclusive of a meeting scheduled for the City of Temecula on May 21s~, and a meeting in the City of Riverside on June 5~h R:\Minutes\050702 1 · The plan for the environmental document to be out for public comments in late June or early July, and the anticipation of having the Board of Supervisors take action on the General Plan in November or December of 2002 · With respect to the MSHCP, noted that a Draft Plan had been distributed in early March, relaying current efforts regarding implementing revisions; and advised that the issues of concem which would be extensively addressed in the next month would be the following: o An avenue for managing the reserve system o The admJnistrative structures (i.e., the consideration for creating a new regional authority), and o Funding · Noted hopes of releasing the environmental documents for public review in July, the General Plan being presented to the Board of Supervisors for action in December of 2002, and meetings with the cities regarding the Implementing Agreement being scheduled for January or early February of 2003 Via a PowerPoint Presentation, Mr. Steve Smith provided an overview of the proposed County's General Plan, and its associated impacts on the City of Temecula, as well as the CETAP alternatives in the Temecula area, highlighting the following: · The key features of the transportation analysis were, as follows: o Buildout of land use and roadway of the cities and the County- with approximately 1 million dwelling units, the majority of that development being within the cities o Employment in the Western County at approximately 1.3 million employees, the majority of that being within the cities. For Councilman Comerchero, Mr. Smith provided additional information regarding the analysis, which revealed that the percentage of anticipated development would be similar as is today. Councilman Stone advised that there was a vast differential between the approximate 4,000 additional approvals in the City, and the more than 30,000 additional approvals in the County. Mr. Smith noted that the analysis encompassed Western Countywide studies, relaying that the situation in Temecula could be slightly different, confirming that there was a plethora of development occurring in the unincorporated areas, additionally confirming that various assumptions were taken into account in the modeling regarding the tribal lands, as well as land use data regarding the Domenigoni Reservoir facilities. o The redistributed development of the MSHCP areas o The buildout of the CETAP corridors o The future planned transit express system for Western County · Other assumptions pertaining to Temecula, as follows: o Butterfield Stage Road as a four-lane arterial R:\Minutes\050702 2 o CETAP Alternative 1, 7a, or 7b o A new interchange (French Valley Parkway) o A new four-lane arterial tying into the 1-15 Freeway Interchange south of Highway 79 (South) o The 1-15 Freeway at 10 lanes and 14 lanes from Winchester Road to the 1-215 Freeway · Specified the CETAP alternatives which were analyzed For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Smith confirmed that there was a study analyzing an alternative east of Temecula, confirming that while there would be an alignment in that route that included Butterfield Stage Road, the issues associated with the alignment have been recognized, advising that this particular alternative would not be denoted as a preferred alternative but that the studies would continue. For clarification, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed, for Councilman Naggar, that as part of the environmental process, additional alternatives have to be studied. Mayor Pro Tern Stone advised that this City Council would never permit Butterfield Stage Road becoming a freeway corridor. ,, The analysis which included the buildout of the existing General Plan land use and roadways, as well as the building out of land use and roadways in the cities, excluding the CETAP corridors and the MSHCP, and the analysis which studied no more development or roadway construction in the unincorporated areas with the buildout in the cities, excluding the CETAP corridors and the MSHCP. For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Smith noted that the second analysis took into account the development of no additional homes in the unincorporated areas in order to obtain a comparison analysis o The results of the above analysis revealed the following: · The arterials could accommodate the demand with the anticipated traffic · The freeway system would be severely congested during peak hours, the LOS in various areas projected at LOS F over most of Western County For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Smith relayed that the expected long- term LOS on the freeway would be Service Level F, advising that Mayor Roberts was provided with additional information regarding this matter. · The County's contribution to the 1-15 Freeway impacts For City Manager Nelson, Mr. Smith relayed that the projected LOS levels reflected projections at buildout. · That the proposed General Plan resulted in less congestion than the existing General Plan R:\Minutes\050702 3 · Concluded that stopping County development and road construction would result in worse conditions on various roadways o Specified observations regarding the 1-15 Freeway · That the freeway currently carried 170,000 vehicles per day (between Winchester Road and the 1-215 Freeway) · That there was an anticipated 260,000 vehicles per day by 2025 · That there was an anticipated 350,000 vehicles per day at buildout · . That these anticipated trips were commensurate with some of the highest volume facility freeways in Southern California · That the future growth of the County accounts for less than 10% of the projected volumes in this particular section at buildout - due to through traffic, and traffic generated locally and by other cites For City Manager Nelson, Mr. Smith confirmed that this analysis only addressed the freeway section between Winchester Road and the 1-215 Freeway, advising that Mayor Roberts had additional data provided him regarding the 1-15 Freeway and the 215 Freeway · Via overhead maps, provided a comparison diagram comparing the buildout of the proposed General Plan with the existing General Plan which reflected the volumes capacity ratios for the facilities For Deputy City Manager Thornhill, Mr. Smith relayed that in the data the existing General Plan analysis included what was in existence now, and the proposed General Plan was the plan before the Planning Commission at this time. Providing additional clarification, Mr. Edwin Studor noted that the basis for the existing General Plan was the General Plan that existed when the analysis began, which did not reflect the amendments subsequently made in the last couple of years by the Board. · Via overhead maps, presented a diagram, which represented the percentage of traffic which would be attributable to growth and roadway development in the County, isolating areas with LOSs less than LOS D Mayor Pro Tern Stone noted that the comparison data appeared inaccurate between the proposed General Plan and the existing General Plan in that the existing General Plan analysis did not reflect the recent amendments, advising that the difference between the existing General Plan data and the actual existing General Plan statistics (with the recent amendments) would be substantial. For Councilman Naggar, it was reiterated that the no project buildout analysis only included development that existed today and not the assessment of approved projects, which do not exist at this time. · Recapitulated the CETAP Corridor studies o Identified priority corridors to be studied which encompassed two intra- County corridors and two inter-County corridors R:\Minutes\050702 4 o Identified alternatives to be studied for environmental study purposes in conjunction with the Federal agencies o The anticipated EIPJEIS circulation of the corridor studies for public review in early July · Relayed the objectives of the CETAP alternatives, as follows: o To maintain acceptable traffic flow on the Winchester Road corridor as well as on the 1-15 Freeway o To develop provision of an effective route for regional traffic between the 1-10 Freeway in Banning/Beaumont and the 1-15 Freeway to San Diego o To minimize the environmental impacts o To preserve right-of-way · Via overhead maps and diagrams, specified the routes of Alternatives 1, 5a, 5b, and 7b · Via overheads, specified the express routes and potential transit oasis locations Councilman Pratt relayed that mass transportation would aid in addressing traffic impacts, advising that in Europe the number of vehicles were restricted which could be a concept considered for this area. In response, Mr. Lashbrook noted that the previously presented express routes included the connection of major nodes of development within Western County, noting that transit will not solve the congestion problem but would provide options for travel. Mayor Roberts relayed that the three percent (3%) reduction in vehicle trips, which could occur in Western County with full implementation, would not create a significant positive impact, noting the need for utilizing mass transit. In response, Mr. Lashbrook relayed that while every effort would be made to provide a transit system, it would not eliminate the anticipated heavy congestion impacts. For Mayor Pro Tern Stone, Mr. Lashbrook confirmed that the anticipated LOS would be F on the 1-15 Freeway at buildout. Mayor Pro Tern Stone relayed that the forecast for this area was disaster, noting that if it was known today that in 2025 the LOS would be F on the freeways, and if this impact was not mitigated in these early planning stages, then it was his opinion that the CETAP process was a failure; forecasted that in 2027 the emphasis on public transit would be more acceptable due to expected high gas prices, opining that infrastructure should be provided now; additionally commented on the safety risks associated with transit options as the Metrolink which share a rail with cargo trains, recommending that right-of-way for a rail along the side of the freeway be secured at this time for future transit development; and concluded that this project was a complete failure unless remedies were setforth to ensure that the quality of life could be enhanced. Councilman Comerchero relayed that the City of Temecula conducted traffic studies in order to resolve anticipated impacts, advising that per the County's presentation it appeared that the message was that gridlock was to be expected in the next 20 or more years, concurring with Mayor Pro Tern Stone's queries regarding conducting a $30 million planned effort which offered no substantial resolutions. R:\Minutes\050702 5 Mr. Lashbrook relayed that a detailed traffic analysis of this type had not been conducted until this point in time; clarified that the arterial roadways have been addressed and a framework for an express transit system has been laid out; and additionally noted that the only alternatives that would address the 1-15 Freeway impacts were the elements which included the route to the east of Temecula. Councilman Naggar noted his preference to not cluster development in order that a higher quality of living be maintained; noted that it did not seem prudent to invest in clustering with high density nodes which was only forecasted to reduce traffic congestion by three percent (3%); with respect to State mandates to provide affordable housing, relayed that when compared with alternate cities (i.e., in North County), the prices of homes in Temecula were affordable; noted that the anticipated future traffic impacts would worsen if all the projected traffic improvements indicated could not be implemented while the development continued; and recommended that the nexus of necessary road improvements be identified with development projects, as well as funding sources. Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that it would be helpful to know the anticipated growth regarding the number of trips contributing to the projected congestion which was generated from outside the area, including truck traffic; with respect to European development, noted that development occurred in density nodes (i.e., clustering), relaying that the transit ridership was well above thirty percent (30%); and advised that if efforts could be focused on transit nodes in terms of planning, then a higher percentage of transit ridership could be achieved. Councilman Naggar relayed that if clustered development only yielded a three percent (3%) reduction in traffic, the results were inconsequential. Mr. Lashbrook advised that although the projected traffic levels were alarming, there were benefits to having this comprehensive analysis available, noting that with this information planning could take into account the vital data; noted that clustering development was an alternative which cities could opt to implement to offset the impacts, relaying the efforts in seeking solutions to mitigate confining our residents to gridlock. For Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Mr. Lashbrook confirmed that in identifying corridors and major new facilities, sufficient right-of-way in the County was also being identified for the provision of transit alternatives; and concurred that planning for transit should be discussed regionally, confirming that setting aside right-of-way in the County would be negated if right-of-way was not also being secured in the cities. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Stone, Director of Public Works Hughes specified the issues that would have to be considered regionally, noting the importance of combining efforts to seek solutions to the traffic impacts (i.e., an alternate north/south corridor, addressing density issues.) Ms. Cathy Beck clarified that with the CETAP alternatives, there were routes that traversed through areas within the cities, concurring that the cities would be key partners with the County regarding the selected corridor as well as with other issues. Mayor Roberts thanked the County representatives for the presentation. At 7:20 P.M. the City Council convened to Closed Session, reconvening to the City Council meeting at 8:44 P.M. R:\Minutes\050702 6 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT No comments. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 8:45 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 14, 2002, at ?:00 P.M., for the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting, in the City Council Chambers, of City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\050702 7 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MAY 14, 2002 After the Closed Session that convened at 5:30 P.M., the City Council convened in Open Session at 7:00 P.M., on Tuesday, May 14, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Robeds Absent: Councilmember: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Andrea Grangruth. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Bishop Frazier of Rock of Faith. ALLEGIANCE The flag ceremony was presented by Boy Scout Troop No. 324. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS National Public Works Week Proclamation Mayor Roberts presented the proclamation to Public Work Director Bill Hughes. Water Awareness Month Proclamation Mayor Roberts presented the proclamation and stated that it would be mailed to the appropriate parties. Mental Health Month Proclamation Mayor Roberts presented the proclamation to Ms. Joanne Moore, Member of Mid-County Registrar Health Board. Ms. Moore thanked Mayor Roberts and the City Council for the proclamation and its willingness to increase awareness of Mental Illness and available treatments. Theatre Foundation Presentation Mr. Dan Steveson, Mr. Harry Clark, Ms. Lisa Furgeson, and Mr. Chuck Washington, on behalf of the Theatre Foundation, presented the City of Temecula with a $200,000 check toward the construction of the Temecula Community Theatre. Mayor Roberts thanked the Theatre Foundation for its generous contribution to the City and the continued interest in building Fine Arts within the community. R:\Minutes\051402 1 California Association of Public Information Officials Award for the City's Website Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services, presented Mayor Roberts and the City with a first place award on behalf of CAPIO (California Association of Public Information Officials). The award placed in the category of "Websites" for its section on "Public Transportation Options." Entries were judged for creativity in subject matter, innovation in presentation and style, uniqueness of format, and effective use of resources. Ms. Jones recognized Pat Comerchero for her excellence in providing the City with an outstanding Web Site, which greatly enhances public accessibility to City Hall. She also announced the City has received a 2001-2002 "Golden Web Award" for the third year in a row. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, representing the VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars), Post 4089, invited the City Council, staff and public to the Memorial Day Celebration, to be held on May 31~t from 10:00 AM to 12:00 Noon, on Santiago Road next to the Catholic Church. He invited questions by contacting the VFVV at 676-1541. B. Supporting additional hours at Chaparral Pool, Jana Clark, P.O. Box 2449, representing the Inland Gold Aquatics Team, encouraged the City Council to review the current scheduling of pool hours for swim clubs. Community Services Director Herman Parker responded to Ms. Clark's comments, stating Inland Gold Aquatics currently receive pool time five nights a week at a Temecula Site. He stated he feels the scheduled time is appropriate for the size of the program and to meet their program needs. D. Representing the Valley Winds Community Concert Band, Mark Margolin, 32321 Cercle Beauregard, invited the City Council and Community to attend the Wine Country Community Band Festival, to be held on June 2n~ at the Wilson Creek Winery. The event is to feature seven bands from all over Southern California with over 250 per[ormers participating. E. James Morgan, 26111 Ynez Road, introduced himself as the new YMCA Executive Director and expressed his enthusiasm to work in this great community. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Councilman Comerchero reported his participation in the RCTC Bus Rodeo, where professional bus drivers, representing Cities along the 1-15 corridor, navigated an obstacle course, with the winner going to Las Vegas to compete as National Champion. Councilman Comerchero announced Temecula did prevail and will be participating in the National Championship. B. Councilman Pratt commended the Police Department for their outstanding Annual Report, noting the City now has six full-time motor officers to handle traffic in Temecula. Councilman Pratt also voiced his opposition to the May 13~h RCIP Meeting. He expressed desires to formally challenge the EIR and ElS, and stated this plan is destined to fail, without cooperation of the general public in their willingness to "share the ride," and explore alternate transit systems. R:\Minutes\051402 2 C Mayor Roberts reported he and Councilman Pratt participated in the Grand Opening of the new 91 Freeway Metrolink Line, which goes between Riverside and Corona and into Fullerton. D. Councilman Naggar made a presentation to the City Council regarding Megan's Law. He reported that thanks to Police Chief Jim Domenoe, residents within 60-90 days, would be able to view information regarding registered sex offenders on CD Rom at the Local Police Station. Previously, this information was only available at the Main Riverside Sheriff's Station. He also reported that some cities have implemented a pin map system that is available via the Internet and requested that the City investigate the feasibility of the City of Temecula providing this information on the City's Website. Council concurrence was obtained to allocate staff time to research not only the legality, but also feasibility of this proposal. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Approval of Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of March 26, 2002. 3 Resolution Approvin~ List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2002. R:\Minutes\051402 3 5 Tablet PC Purchase RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the purchase of Fujitsu Table PC's with the associated accessories from En Pointe Technology for $85,344.47. 6 Approve Sponsorship for the Temecula On Staqe Event presented by the Theatre Foundation RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve funding for the Temecula On Stage Event for actual City-support costs in the amount up to $8,800.00. 6.2 Approve the event sponsorship agreement with the Theatre Foundation and authorize the mayor to execute the agreement. (Mayor Pro Tern Stone abstained with regard to this item,) 7 Approve Sponsorship request for the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve funding request of $30,000.00 for the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival; 7.2 Approve the event advertising agreement with the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 8 Award of Contract for Audit Services for the Fiscal Years endinq June 30, 2002, 03 and 2004 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Award a contract to Diehl, Evans & Company as auditors for the fiscal Years ending June 30, 2002, 2003, and 2004. 9 Tract Map No. 25055 - Findinq of Conformance with its orif~inal approval (located on the north side of Via La Vida between Marclarita Road and Solana Way) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Tract Map No. 25055 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 9.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 9.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. (Councilman Comerchero abstained with regard to this item.) R:\Minutes\051402 4 10 Old Town Southern Gatewav Landscapinq/Rotarv Park Expansion Project - Approval of Negative Declaration (EA-93) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE OLD TOWN SOUTHERN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING/ROTARY PARK EXPANSION PROJECT (Mayor Pro Tern Stone abstained with regard to this item.) 11 Completion and Acceptance for the marqarita Road Improvements - Phase I -Pio Pico to SR 79 South, Proiect No. PW99-01 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Accept Margarita Road Improvements - Phase I - Project No. PW99-01, as complete; 11.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 11.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. 12 Notice of Completion Citvwide P.C.C. Repairs FY2001-2002 - Proiect No. PW01-30 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Accept the Citywide P.C.C. Repairs FY2001-2002 project, as complete; 12.2 File a Notice of completion and release the Performance Bond; 12.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. 13 Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Aqreement - Berryman & Heniqar Pavement Manaqement Update - FY 2001-2006 - Proiect No. PW01-22 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Berryman & Henigar in the amount of $6,800.00 to provide additional pavement design services, and authorize the Mayor to execute this amendment. R:\Minutes\051402 5 14 Solicitation of Construction Bids for First Street Extension Environmental Mitiqation Proiect - Project No. PW01-08 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the project plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the construction of First Street Extension Environmental Mitigation, Project No. PW01-08. 15 Winchester Road Riqht-of-Wav Easement RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Accept a portion of the Winchester Road Transportation Corridor Easement, as shown on Exhibit A and B, that was offered for dedication on Tract Map No. 28530- 2, recorded on November 9, 1998 as instrument No. 487643. 16 Library Joint Use Cooperative Aqreement and Verification Letter of Deposit RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the Library Joint Use Cooperative Agreement among the Temecula Valley Unified School District, the County of Riverside, and the City of Temecula to provide programs and services that enhance the academic goals for school children in grades K through 12; 16.2 Accept a Verification Letter of Deposit in the amount of $100,000.00 from the Friends of the Temecula Library as a contribution toward the construction of the new Temecula Public Library. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 16 (Mayor Pro Tern Stone abstained with regard to item nos. 6, 10, and 14; Councilman Comerchero abstained with regard to item no. 10.) The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected approval. At 7:45 P M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District, and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. The City Council Meeting resumed at 7:52 P.M. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Nelson advised that the City Council and public that the Statement Budget has been released and there will be a fiscal impact to local government. He stated he would provide further details at a later time. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that under the Brown Act, there were no reportable actions to report. R:\Minutes\051402 6 ADJOURNMENT At 7:54 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 28, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: SusanW. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\051402 7 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,590,443.68. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 11th day of June, 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2002/Resos 02- 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do cedify that the foregoing Resolution No. 02- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 11th day of June, 2002 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R2Resos2002/Resos 02- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 05/21/02 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 2,346,809.52 05/21/02 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 243,634.16 TOTAL EST OF DEMANDS FOR 06/11102 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 2,590,443.68 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 1,991,249.91 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 8,624.77 190 CO~MU NITY SERVICES DISTRICT 96,354.66 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 5,241.86 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 51,799.84 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,882.06 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 143,370.92 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 2,935.68 300 INSURANCE FUND 415.35 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 18,536.53 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 23,530.45 340 FACILITIES 2,867.49 $ 2,346,809.52 001 GENERAL $ 172,168.35 165 RDA CEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 4,499.20 190 COIV~UNITI' SERVICES DISTRICT 45,362.12 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 66.24 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 4,461.31 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 563.53 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-ClP 1,896.92 300 INSURANCE FUND 860.06 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 7,235.11 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,890.48 340 FACILITIES 4,630.84 243,634.16 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 2,590,443.68 PREPARED BY RETA WESTON, ACCOUNTING SPEC[ed. IST ECTD OF C ' sA~w.~, ~.. ~ ~'~. ~~ ' . HE~ESV CE.T~ T~T THE FOL'OW,.O ,S TRUE MD CO..ECT. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUNO 1,991,249.91 165 ADA DEV- LO~/MO0 SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 96,354.66 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 5,241.86 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 51,?99.84 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D lw8~2.06 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROd FUND 143,370.92 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 415.35 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 18,536.53 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 23,530.45 340 FACILITIES 2,867.49 TOTAL 2,346,809.52 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 76814 05/17/02 004960 ASH~ORTH, DARTHA L. ENTERTAINMENT:JAZZ FESTIVAL 280.199.999.5362 700.00 700.00 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001.2070 63.36 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165.2070 6.90 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190.2070 138.65 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193.2070 2.95 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EO0) 000444 SDI 330.2070 2.56 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDO) 000444 SDI 340.2070 7.63 152302 05/21/02 000444 IRSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001.2070 6,725.79 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165.2070 125.77 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190.2070 1,263.94 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDO) 000444 STATE 192.2070 5.91 152302 05/21/02 000444 %NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193.2070 138.42 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194.2070 43.86 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280.2070 42.79 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300.2070 26.13 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EOD) 000444 STATE 320.2070 308.62 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330.2070 67.16 152302 05/21/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340.2070 111.46 9,081.90 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001.2070 23,523.63 252302 05/21/02 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165.2070 445.97 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190.2070 5,504.03 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192.2070 18.44 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193.2070 563.65 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194.2070 138.16 252302 05/21/02 00028~ INSTATAX (IRS) 00028~ FEOERAL 280.2070 156.75 252302 05/21/02 00028~ INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300.2070 78.18 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320.2070 1,306.36 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330.2070 263.50 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340.2070 496.69 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001.2070 6,442.7~ 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165.2070 168.27 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190.2070 1,629.64 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192.2070 2.80 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193.2070 157.40 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194.2070 23.65 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (1RS) 000283 MEDICARE 280.2070 66.91 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300.2070 32.49 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320.2070 295.80 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330.2070 67.08 252302 05/21/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 340.2070 160.54 41,542.67 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001.2390 27,9~3.53 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERs (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165.2390 669.01 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190.2390 5,117.62 35Z302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET%RE 000246 PERS RET 192.2390 12.06 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193.2390 57'3.59 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194.2390 105.04 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280.2390 289.21 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300.2390 139.55 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHEEK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTIOR NUMSER AMOUNT AMOUNT 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320.2130 26.51 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PEAS RET 320.2390 1,208.56 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PEAS RET 330.2390 223.51 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PEAS RET 340.2390 596.88 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PEAS-PRE 001.2130 182.91 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001.2390 94.17 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165.2390 1.87 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190.2390 20.01 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192.2390 .05 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193.2390 2.74 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194.2390 .36 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280.2390 .92 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300.2390 352302 05/21/02 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320.2390 3.72 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330.2390 1.]9 352302 05/21/02 000246 PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340.2390 2.65 37,246.32 76817 05/21/02 004970 2ND AVENUE JAZZ BAND ENTERTAINMENT:JAZZ FESTIVAL 280.199.999.5362 100.00 100.00 76818 05/21/02 000745 A T & T glRELESS SERVIC CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:INF SYS 320.199.999.5208 54.99 54.99 76819 05/21/02 0049~ ABACHERLI, LINDI TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190.183.999.5330 358.95 358.95 76820 05/21/02 004901 AOVENTURES IN TEAM ESTE CITY CLERK TEAM BUILDING 001.120.999.5261 2,100.00 2,100.00 76821 05/21/02 0027'33 ALBAO, NANCY TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190.183.999.5330 800.00 800.00 76822 05/21/02 004917 ALL-WAYS HVAC RES IMPR PRGM: VILLA,RICHARD 165.199.813.5804 2,125.00 76823 05/21/02 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE CITY LIMITS BLOUO DRAWS'PD/CHP 001.170.999.5328 63.00 76823 05/21/02 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE CITY LIMITS BLOOD ORAWS'PO/CHP 001.170.999.5328 336.00 399.00 76~24 05/21/02 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS LIFEGUARD TRAINING VIDEOS 190.186.999.5261 225.00 76824 05/21/02 000936 AMERICAN REO CROSS EMERGENCY RESPONSE VIOEOS 190.186.999.5261 265.00 76~24 05/21/02 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS FIRST AID TRAINING:CITY STAFF 190.186.999.5261 130.00 76824 05/21/02 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS JR LIFEGUARD CERTIFICATIONS 190.186.999.5261 200.00 820.00 76825 05/21/02 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE V APRIL 2002 ANIMAL CONTROL SVCS 001.17~.999.5255 5~909.64 5,909.64. 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 04/13 HARDIN 330.199.999.5118 ]]4.10 ?6826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 04/20 HARDIN 330.199.999.5118 332.54 76~26 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 04/27 HARDIN 330.199.999.5118 266.24 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 04/27 ACOSTA 001.163.999.5118 244.00 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 04/27 ACOSTA 001.16~.604.5118 244.00 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 04/20 DELARM 001.163.999.5118 3?8.60 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 04/2? DELARM 001.163.999.5118 326.0? 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 04/27 DELARM 001.164.604.5118 324.93 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP ~/E 05/04 SENG 001.162.999.5118 468.00 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 HARDIN 330.199.999.5118 330.85 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 CRAMER 190.186.999.5118 200.20 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, 1NC. TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 ~AHLQUIST 001.140.999.5118 520.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA PAGE 3 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 ACOSTA 001.163.999.5118 305.00 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 ACOSTA 001.164.604.5118 305.00 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP U/E 05/04 DELAHM 001.163.999.5118 286.50 76826 05/21/02 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TENP HELP W/E 05/04 DELARM 001.164.604.5118 285.50 5,151.53 76827 05/21/02 003221 BEAL, KELLI REIMS: GIS PUBLICATION 001.161.610.5228 82.97 82.97 76828 05/21/02 003126 SOOMGRARDEN, DENNIS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190.183.999.5330 314.40 314.40 76829 05/21/02 004955 BOSSING, EHHETT ENTERTAINMENT:JAZZ FESTIVAL 280.199.999.5362 300.00 300.00 76830 05/21/02 004954 BRAHDEBERRY, ROBERT A. ENTERTAINMENT:JAZZ FESTIVAL 280.199.999.5362 300.00 300.00 76831 05/21/02 002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SO IPAQ PPC TRAINING:CITY HALL 320.199.999.5261 650.00 76831 05/21/02 002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION SO COMPUTER TRAIHING FOR CITY EE 320.199.999.5261 2,400.00 3,050.00 76832 05/21/02 CALIF BOARO OF ACCOUNTA CPA LICENSE RENEWAL:ROBERTS,G. 001.140.999.5226 200.00 200.00 76833 05/21/02 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A MAR BLO00 ALCOHOL ANALYSIS SVC 001.170.999.5328 525.00 ?6833 05/21/02 004248 CALIF DEPT OF dUSTICE/A APR FINGERPRINT CHECK FOR EE 001.150.999.5250 530.00 ?6833 05/21/02 004248 CALIF DEPT OF dUSTICE/A APRIL FINGERPRINT CHECK FOR EE 001.150.999.5250 100.00 76833 05/21/02 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A CREOIT:OVRCHRGEO FUOALACHENET) 001.170.999.5328 35.00- 1,120.00 768~4 05/21/02 001267 CALIF OEPT OF MOTOR VEH REGISTRATION RENEWAL:4TRH912 001.110.999.5214 215.00 215.00 76835 05/21/02 CALIF PLANNING FOUNDATI COMH SKILLS CF:RUSH/HCCOY:6/21 001.161.999.5261 200.00 200.00 76836 05/21/02 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICE TCC COPIER LEASE:MAY/JUNE 2002 330.2800 572.00 76836 05/21/02 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICE FIRE STN 84 COPIER LEASE 330.2800 572.00 76836 05/21/02 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICE CITY HALL COPIER LEASE:HAY/JUN 330.2800 11,074.68 76836 05/21/02 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICE SALES TAX 330.2800 946.94 13,165.62 ?6837 05/21/02 00483? CHERRY VALLEY FEED/PET F(X~O FOR POLICE K-9 ,,KAOS" 001.170.999.5327 59.81 59.81 76838 05/21/02 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001.170.999.5262 214.94 76838 05/21/02 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CiTY VEHICLES 001.110.999.5262 29.90 244.8~ 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.120.999.5208 361.98 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.1990 43.02 76SS9 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.140.999.5208 95.28 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.161.999.5208 565.72 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.162.999.5208 664.93 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 190.1990 1,112.92 76839 05/21/02 003021 ClNGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 280.199.999.5208 133.94 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 330.1990 65.33 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.163.999.5208 272.30 7~9 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.16/+.601.5208 405.44 76~39 05/21/02 003021 C[NGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.164.602.5208 109.10 ?6839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR UIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.16/+.604.5208 55.94 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINOULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.165.999.5208 312.90 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.1990 297.69 VOUCBRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 768]9 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.100.999.5208 445.20 768]9 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.1990 227.72 768~9 05/21/02 003021 CINOULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 001.150.999.5208 57.34 76839 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 320.199.999.5208 611.85 768~9 05/21/02 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 4/9/02-5/8/02 CELLULAR PHONE 330.199.999.5208 .31 5,838.91 768/+1 05/21/02 0037'55 CINOULAR WIRELESS (EQUI MIS( PCS PHONE EQUIPMENT:IS 320.199.999.5242 336.07 336.07 76842 05/21/02 004017 COMER(HERO, JEFF CALED CONF:O4/2-5:SAN DIEGO 001.100.999.5258 6.00 76842 05/21/02 004017 COMER(HERO, JEFF LESS PERSONAL EXPENSE 001.100.999.5258 22.61- 76842 05/21/02 004017 COMERCHERO, JEFF CONGRESSIONAL CITY CONF:3/8-12 001.100.999.5258 113.47 76842 05/21/02 004017 COMER(NERO, JEFF LESS PERSONAL EXPENSE 001.100.999.5258 33.77- 76842 05/21/02 O04O17 COMERCHERO, JEFF NAT'L LEAGUE & ECON 0EV:5/2-5 001.100.999.5258 50.00 76842 05/21/02 004017 COMER(HERO, dEFF LESS PERSONAL EXPENSE' 001.1170 13.50~ 76842 05/21/02 004017 COMER(HERO, JEFF PLANNER INSTITUTE MTG:3/20-22 001.100.999.5258 18.75 118.34 76843 05/21/02 004405 COI4NUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CH( 001.2120 87.00 76843 05/21/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CH( 190.2120 42.90 76843 05/21/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CH( 192.2120 .05 76843 05/21/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 'CHC 193.2120 1.20 76845 05/21/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CH( 194.2120 1.95 76843 05/21/02 004405 CG*qHUN]TY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CH( 330.2120 7.50 76843 05/21/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CH( 340.2120 .90 141.50 76844 05/21/02 001193 COMP U S A INC MiSt COMPUTER EQUIP:INF SYS 320.199.999.5242 639.50 639.50 76845 05/21/02 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS MNTC FAC ALARM MOOIFICATION 210,190,158.5804 792.56 76845 05/21/02 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS MNTC FAC ALARM MOOIFICATIONS 210,190.158.5804 1,177.44 76845 05/21/02 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS SR CENTER ALARM MOOIFICATIONS 210.190.165.5804 1,960.00 76845 05/21/02 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS MNTC FAC ALARM SYSTEM REPAIRS 340.199.702.5212 110.00 4,040.00 76846 05/21/02 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RELOCATED ANTENNA CABLE:FIRE 001.171.999.5215 708.42 76846 05/21/02 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RELOCATED ANTENNA CABLE:FIRE 001.171.999.5215 240.00 948.42 76847 05/21/02 0037'59 COTTON BELAND ASSOCIATE' CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 001,161.999.5248 23,054.40 23,054.40 76848 05/21/02 001716 DANS ROOFING REPAIR LEAKING ROOF:CITY BALL 340.199.701.5212 450.00 450.00 76849 05/21/02 001393 DATA TICKET [NC CITATIONS PROCESSING FOR MAR 001,170.999.5250 414.48 414.48 76850 05/21/02 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS MEDICAL SERVICES:POLICE K-9 001,170.999.5327 293.39 293.39 76851 05/21/02 004612 DIRT CONNECTION INC, TH SILT/DEBRIS REMOVAL:R.CAL ROAD 001,164.601.5401 25,000.00 25,000.00 76852 05/21/02 004294 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE C APR PRGS:PALA RD BRDG LDSCP 210,165.631.5804 14,435.00 14,435.00 76853 05/21/02 004781 DRAEGER SAFETY IN( HANOHELO BREATHALYZER SUPPLIES 001.170.999.5242 139.92 139.92 76854 05/21/02 003223 EDAW INC BIOLOGICAL SVC:LG CANYON BASIN 001.164.601.52~5 612.50 76854 05/21/02 003223 EOAM IHC BIOLOGICAL SVC:PALA RD BRDG 210,165.631.5801 412,50 1o025.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FDR ALL PERIOUS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENOOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMSER OATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 76855 05/21/02 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC INFORUM GOLO UPGRAOE:PRJT MGR 320.1980 625.00 76855 05/21/02 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC INFORUN GOLD UPGRADE:PRJT MGI~T 320.1980 218.75 76~55 05/21/02 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC INFORUM GOLD UPGRADE:DATA CONV 320.1980 437.50 76855 05/21/02 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC %NFORUN GOLD UPGRADE:EXP REIMB 320.1980 1,358.70 2,639.95 76856 05/21/02 004111 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT EMPLOYERS IN CITY LIMIT CD-ROM 001.111.999.5270 1,371.00 1,371.00 76857 05/21/02 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R MAP OBJECTS CONSULTING SVCS 001.161.610.5250 298.00 298.00 76~58 05/21/02 00016/, ESGIL CORPORATION APRIL PLAN CHECK SERVICES:B&S 001.162.999.5248 6,340.36 6,340.36 76859 05/21/02 002060 EUROPEAN OELI& CATERIN REFRESHMENTS:COUNCIL MTG 5/14 001.100.999.5260 16/+.21 164.21 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE APR LOSCP IMPR:TUSCAHY RIDGE 190.180.999.5212 175.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP IMPR:VETERANS PARK 190.180.999.5212 105.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LOSCP IMPR:VAIL RANCH REHA 190.180.999.5416 6,557.50 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LOSCP IMPR:NARGARITA PARK 190.180.999.5212 350.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP INPR:NICOLAB RD PARK 190.180.999.5415 175.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP IMPR:NICOLAS RD PARK 190.180.999.5415 334.40 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP IMPR:CAMPOS VERDEES 190.180.999.5415 150.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LOSGP IMPR:RIVERTON PARK 190.180.999.5415 250.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:HEIGHBORHO00 PRK 190.180.999.5415 19,120.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:SPDRTS PARK 190.180.999.5415 25,325.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:MEOIANS 190.180.999.5415 2,625.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE .APR LDSCP SVC:CRC 190.182.999.5415 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:SR CENTER 190.181.999.5415 361.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:C.HALL/MNTC FAC 340.199.701.5415 541.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:TCC 190.184.999.5415 193.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:FIRE STN 8/~ 001.171.999.5212 400.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:OLD TWN PRKLOT A 001.16/+.603.5415 250.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE APR LOSCP SVC:OLD TWN STRSCAPE 001.164.603.5415 987.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:MUSEUM 190.185.999.5415 285.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:CNILD MUSEUM 190.188.999.5415 155.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:SOUTH SLOPES 193.180.999.5415 25,556.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSGP SVC:NORTH SLOPES 193.180.999.5415 14,778.00 76860 05/21/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSCP SVC:OLD T~N PRKLOT B 001.16~.603.5415 250.00 100,366.90 76861 05/21/02 002037 EXPANETS 4 DISPLAY-PHONES ~/16 BUTTON 320.199.999.S242 1,455.8~ 76861 05/21/02 002037 EXPANETS FREIGHT 320.199.999.5242 29.12 76861 05/21/02 002037 EXPANETS SALES TAX 320.199.999.5242 112.83 76861 05/21/02 002037 EXPANETS LABOR CHNGE FOR PHONE REPAIRS 320.199.999.5215 96.00 76861 05/21/02 002037 EXPANETS PHONE MNTC & REPAIRS:CITY HALL 320.199.999.5215 1,993.36 3,687.15 76862 05/21/02 00446/+ EXXOHMOBIL CARO SERVICE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001.110.999.5262 29.70 76862 05/21/02 004464 EXXONMOBIL CARO SERVICE CREOIT:OVRPAIO LAST STATEMENT 001.170.999.5262 6.05- 23.65 76863 05/21/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS lNG EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001.111.999.5230 13.52 76~63 05/21/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001.1990 19.32 76~63 05/21/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001.1990 43.18 76863 05/21/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 1NC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 190.1990 42.89 76863 05/21/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001.162.999.5230 20.15 139.06 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 76864 05/21/02 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK DBA:T 01-02 COMM SVC FUNDING AWARD 001.101.999.5267 5,000.00 5,000.00 76865 05/21/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-3083 NAGGAR:CONF/MISC 001.100.999.5220 6.47 76~55 05/21/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-308~ NAGGAR:CONF/NISC 001.100.999.5260 72.87 ?6865 05/21/02 00334? FIRST BANKCARO CENTER XX-3083 NAGGAR:CREDIT LODGING 001.100.999.5258 56.10- 76~55 05/21/02 00334? FIRST BANKCARO CENTER XX-52~ JONES:EARTHLINK/MISC 001.100.999.5260 95.36 76865 05/21/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-52~ JONES:EARTBLINK/MISC 320.199.999.5242 232,80 76865 05/21/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-S2~ JONES:EARTHLINK/MISC 320.199.999.5211 425.52 ?~5 05/21/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-52~ JONES:EARTHLINK/MISC 001.120.999.5260 28,67 76865 05/21/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER XX-52~ JONES:EARTHLINK/MISG 001.120.999.5258 828.85 1,634.40 05/21/02 000170 FRANKLIN GUEST COMPANY DAY TIMER SUPPLIES:PLANNING 001.161.999.5220 124.56 124.56 05/21/02 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIA APR:FL~R~RITA RD IMPR:PW99'01 210.165.706.5802 282.69 05/21/02 003815 GFB FRIEDRICB & ASSOCIA APR:MARGARITA RO IMPR:PW99-O1 210.165.713.5802 26.81 309.50 76868 05/21/02 004841 GOOBERS JAZZ BAND ENTERTAINMENT:JAZZ FESTIVAL 280.199.999.5362 100.00 100.00 76869 05/21/02 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY I ALARM SRVCS:POLICE STOREFRONTD 001.170.999.5229 60.00 60.00 768?0 05/21/02 GREER, GAIL COORDINATION SVCS @ CHAPEL 190.185.999.5250 150.00 150.00 76871 05/21/02 004053 HABITAT WEST INC MNTC LG CYN DETENTION BASIN 001.164.601.5275 170.00 170.00 ?6872 05/21/02 002906 HEMET FENCE COMPANY RES IMPR PRCd4: SMALL,INEZ 165.199.813.5804 3?5.00 3?5.00 ?687'5 05/21/02 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE TEST CHEMICALS REFRIGERATOR 190.186.999.5242 75.41 75.41 76874 05/21/02 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001.2080 4,254.92 768?4 05/21/02 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165.2080 523.98 ?68?4 05/21/02 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190.2080 521.~ 16874 05/21/02 000194 C H A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 193.2080 12.50 ?60?4 05/21/02 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 194.2080 16.50 76874 05/21/02 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280.2080 ?6074 05/21/02 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 300.2080 50.00 5,554.22 768?5 05/21/02 004911 IMBSEN & ASSOCIATES ]NC FEASIBILITY STUDY:WINCHESTER 210.165.7~8.5802 4,998.15 4,998.15 ?6076 05/21/02 0048?? IN THE NEWS IRC 2 PLAGUES FOR THE POLICE OEPT 001.170.999.5250 361.75 361.75 ?68TT 05/21/02 001517 INTEGRATED INSIGHTS DBA EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROM 001.150.999.5248 574.56 574.56 76878 05/21/02 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190.186.999.5250 247.93 76878 05/21/02 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190.186.999.5250 203.43 451.36 76879 05/21/02 002575 JONES, SUSAN W. RE]MB:CCAC ANNL CONF:4/16-19 001.120.999.5258 13.28 13.28 768Z)0 05/21/02 003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO BROADCASTING:BLUEGRASS FESTIVA 280.199.999.5362 386.00 384.00 76881 05/21/02 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC CLEANING WESTERN DAY BANNERS 280.199.999.5271 184.00 76881 05/21/02 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC BANNERS CLEANING & STORAGE 001.111.999.5271 117.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 'AMOUNT AMOUNT 76881 05/21/02 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC SALES TAX 001.111.999.5271 37.00 338.50 76882 05/21/02 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC REPAIR HEATER AT FIRE STN 84 001.171.999.5212 60.00 60.00 76883 05/21/02 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 330.199.999.5220 26.88 26.88 76884 05/21/02 001405 KINANIS CLUB OF TEMECUL 01-02 COI4M SVC FUNDING AWARD 001.101,999.5267 5,000.00 5fO00.O0 ?~5 05/21/02 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC MISC POUL SUPPLIES * CRC 190.186.999.5212 145.00 76885 05/21/02 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC SALES TAX 190.186.999.5212 10.85 155.85 76886 05/21/02 001085 L N CURTIS & SONS ELEC BLOWER W/WRIST RING:MEDIC 001.171.999.5610 1,836.33 1,836.33 ?6887 05/21/02 001719 L P A INC STATE GRANT DOC PREP:LIBRARY 210.199.129.5802 4,848.99 4,8/*8.99 7(~ o5/21/o2 0032a6 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI APR SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001.101.999.5285 11,407.35 76888 05/21/02 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI APR SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001.101.999.5285 1,370.17 12,777.52 76889 05/21/02 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & ~HIT APRIL GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 001.130.999.5247 2,243.50 2,243.50 76890 05/21/02 004174 LIGHT IMPRESSIONS MiSt SUPPLIES FOR TEM MUSEUM 190.185.999.5301 46.60 46.60 76891 05/21/02 000996 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC LONGTIN~S CALIF LAND USE 2d 001.100.999.5228 99.76 99.76 76892 05/21/02 003028 LOS ANGELES TIMES RECRUITMENT AD:ENG & PLANNING 001.150.999.5254 1,400.00 76893 05/21/02 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MBRSHP OUES:HUGHES/BURON/WEST 001.164.601.5226 120.00 120.00 ?6894 05/21/02 00196? MANPOt4ER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP ~/E 04/21 SAVAGE 001.120.999.5118 69.02 76894 05/21/02 001967 MANPOUER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP g/E 04/28'NOVOTNY 001.171.999.5118 464.40 533.42 76895 05/21/02 000217 ~ARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS OFFICIATING SVCS:SOFTBALL:TCSO 190.187.999.5250 3,350.00 3,350.00 76896 05/21/02 001256 MARRIOTT HOTEL HTL:GIS CF:7/9/02:~5439448 001.161.610.5258 109.54 109.54 76897 05/21/02 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA APR-MAY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 001.16~.999.5248 2,668.35 2,668.35 ?6898 05/21/02 004170 MATRIX IMAGING PROOUCTS SCANNER PARTS:RECORDS MGMT 001.120.999.5277 138.07 138.07 76899 05/21/02 00138/* MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:TEM POLICE DEPT 001.170.999.5222 39.75 76899 05/21/02 001384 MINUTE~L~N PRESS SALES TAX 001.170.999.5222 3.08 76899 05/21/02 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:SGT R.[~]OO 001.170.999.5222 39.75 76899 05/21/02 0013~ MINUTE~L~N PRESS SALES TAX 001.170.999.5222 3.08 76899 05/21/02 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS POLICE ENVELOPES 001.170.999.5222 68.53 76899 05/21/02 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001.170.999.5222 5.31 76899 05/21/02 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS FOIL BUSINESS CARDS:McBRIDE 001.171.~9.5222 106.60 76899 05/21/02 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001.171,999.5222 8.26 274.36 76900 05/21/02 MISSION OPTC~qETRIC EYE SAFETY GOGGLE LENSES:P~ MAINT 001.164.601.5218 262.00 262.00 76901 05/21/02 001892 MOBILE MODULAR MAY MOUULAR BLDG RENTAL:STN 92 001.171.999.5250 7~.95 7?7.95 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER CATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 76902 05/21/02 004128 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY J. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190.183.999.5330 239.20 239.20 76903 05/21/02 003715 MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS STENCIL PAINT FOR PUBLIC WORKS OO1.16~.601.5218 2,892.7~ 76903 05/21/02 003715 MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS STENCIL PAINT FOR PUBLIC WORKS 001.16~.601.5218 10,742.25 13,634.98 76904 05/21/02 000230 MUNIFINANCIAL APR PUBLIC NOTICE RATES/CHARGE 192.180.999.5256 5,200.00 76906 05/21/02 000230 MUNIFINANCIAL APR PUBLIC NOTICE RATES/CHARGE 193.180.999.5256 3,300.00 76904 05/21/02 000230 MUNIFINANCIAL APR PUBLIC NOTICE RATES/CHARGE 194.180.999.5256 1,371.42 9,071.42 76905 05/21/02 002925 NA~°A AUTO PARTS MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW 001.16~.601.5215 81.39 76905 05/21/02 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC MAINTENAHCE SUPPLIES: PW 001.16~.601.5215 104.51 185.90 76906 05/21/02 006512 NINYO & MOORE GEOTEC SVC:CITY HALL GENERATOR 210.165.612.5804 248.25 268.25 ?6907 05/21/02 00396~ OFFICE OEPOT BUSINESS S MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE 001.170.999.5229 177.92 76907 05/21/02 00596~ OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE 001.170.999.5229 125.18 303.10 76908 05/21/02 002105 OLD TOgN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR: B & S 001.162.999.5214 558.15 76908 05/21/02 002105 OLO TOUN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR: B & S 001.162.999.5216 166.8~ 76908 05/21/02 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR:MAINT OiV 001.16~.601.5214 507.41 1,212.40 76909 05/21/02 002256 P & D CONSULTANTS INC CONTRACT INSPECTORS FOR APRIL 001.162.999.5118 17,293.10 17,293.10 76910 05/21/02 003762 P M X MEDICAL MISC SUPPLIES:FIRE PARAMEDIC 001.171.999.5311 1,081.15 76910 05/21/02 003762 P M X MEDICAL MISC SUPPLIES:FIRE PARAMEDIC 001.171.999.5311 6~1.91 1,723.06 76911 05/21/02 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA MISC SUPPLIES:SPECIAL EVENTS 190.183.999.5370 98.74 98.74 76912 05/21/02 003218 PELA LANDSCAPE PLAN CHK SVC:PWO0-02 OO1.16~.602.5612 215.OO 76912 05/21/02 003218 PELA LANOSCAPE PLAH CHK SVC:P~95-27 210.165.632.5802 559.00 76912 05/21/02 003218 PELA LOSCP PLAN CK & INSPECTION SVC 193.100.999.5248 250.00 1,024.00 76913 05/21/02 002331 PEP BOYS INC MISC SUPPLIES/PARTS:MAINT DIV OO1.16~.601.5214 21.93 21.93 76914 05/21/02 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001.2122 83.99 83.99 76915 05/21/02 000580 PHOTO ~ORKS OF TEMECULA PHOTO PROCESSING:VARIOUS SITES 190.180.999.5250 55.17 55.17 76916 05/21/02 001999 PITNEY 80WES POSTAGE METER & SCALE HNTC 330.199.999.5217 1,06~.26 1,06~.26 76917 05/21/02 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA RENEW ANNUAL MAILIN~ FEE 330.199.999.5230 125.00 125.00 76918 05/21/02 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC MAR CELLULAR SVCS:CITY VAN 190.1990 27.20 27.20 76919 05/21/02 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR RESIDENT IMPROV PRGM:NAGY, N. 165.199.813.5804 6~0.00 76919 05/21/02 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD ODOR RESIDENT %MPROV PRGM:RAMSEY, A 165.199.813.5804 688.00 1,328.00 76920 05/21/02 004529 QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON POLICE MOTORCYCLE MNTC/REPAIRS 001.170.999.5214 230.0? 76920 05/21/02 004529 GUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON 2002 HARLEY-DAVIDSON:POLICE 001.170.503.5610 18,269.62 76920 05/21/02 004529 DUAIO HARLEY-OAVIOSON EXTENDED WARRRNTY SERVICE 001.170.503.5610 084.00 76920 05/21/02 004529 OUAIO HARLEY-OAVIOSON 2002 HARLEY-DAVIOSON:POLICE 001.170.503.5610 18,269.62 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VEND0R VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 76920 05/21/02 004529 QUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON EXTENDED NARRANTY SERVICE 001.170.503.5610 88~.00 38,537.31 76921 05/21/02 004287 QUICKSET PRINTING PRINTING COMMUNITY NENSLETTER 001.110.999.5222 7,714.77 76921 05/21/02 004287 QUICKSET PRINTING SALES TAX 001.110.999.5222 597.89 8,312.66 76922 05/21/02 004792 R H A LANDSCAPE ARCHITE CONSULTANT SVCS:VAIL RANCH PRK 210.190.182.5802 4,491.60 76922 05/21/02 004792 R H A LANDSCAPE ARCHITE CONSULTANT SVCS:VAIL RANCH 210.190.182.5802 8,600.00 13,091.60 76925 05/21/02 00Q981 R H F lNG RAOAR EQUIPMENT & REPAIR:P.D. 001.170.999.5215 254.26 76923 05/21/02 000981 R H F lNG RADAR EQUIPMENT & REPAIR:P.D. 001.170.999.5215 71.19 305.45 76924 05/21/02 004457 R d NOBLE COMPANY PALA RD IMPROV PH 1:PN99-11 210.165.668.5804 105,141.90 76924 05/21/02 00445? R d NOBLE COMPANY RETENTION:PALA RD IMPROV PHI 210.2035 10,514.19- 94,627.71 76925 05/21/02 002612 RADIO SHACK INC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES: IS 520.199.999.5221 23.68 23.68 76926 05/21/02 000262 RANCHO CALIF MATER DIST 0i-17-80000ol VIA EOUARDO 190.180.999.5240 54.82 76926 05/21/02 000262 RANCHO CALIF MATER DIST VARIOUS MATER METERS 190.180.999.5240 1,092.56 76926 05/21/02 000262 RANCHO CALIF MATER DIST VARIOUS MATER METERS 195.180.999.5240 6,306.02 7,455.40 76927 05/21/02 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN MER OUPL KEYS MADE/CITY VEHICLE 001.161.999.5242 40.41 40.41 76928 05/21/02 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS BLUEPRINT REPROOUCTION:P~99-11 210.165.668.5804 5.59 76928 05/21/02 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS BLUEPRINT REPROUUCTION:p~99-11 210.165.668.5804 46.55 76928 05/21/02 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS BLUEPRINT REPRO:OVERLAND BRIOG 001.165.999.5250 126.94 178.88 76929 05/21/02 RANCHO SANTA BARBARA MA SCACEO CLASS 06/28:VOSHALL, J 001.161.999.5261 90.51 90.51 76930 05/21/02 00458~ REGENCY LIGHTING CRC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 190.182.999.5212 406.45 406.45 76931 05/21/02 00496~ RHYTHM & BRENS REFRESHMENT:FIRE PLACEMENT MTG 001.171.999.5260 165.20 76931 05/21/02 00496~ RHYTHM & 8RENS REFRESHMENT:AUTOMATION MTG 001.171.999.5260 51.56 216.76 76932 05/21/02 000266 RIGHTNAY PORT TOILET RENTAL:LONG CANYON 190.180.999.5258 54.39 54.59 76933 05/21/02 000267 RIVERSIOE CO FIRE OEPAR OCT-DEC 2001 FIRE SERVICES 001.171.999.5251 448,541.58 76933 05/21/02 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE OEPAR dAN-MAR 2002 FIRE SERVICES 001.171.999.5251 617,921.37 1,066,462.95 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SNERIFFS D LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:02/06/02 001.170.999.5288 377,348.62 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:02/06/02 001.170.999.5299 94,716.10 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIOE CO SHERIFFS 0 LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:02/06/02 001.170.999.5295 9,073.60 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS O LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:O2/06/02 001.170.999.5294 10,723.40 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:02/06/02 001.170.999.5297 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIOE CO SHERIFFS 0 LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:02/06/02 001.170.999.5291 11,970.00 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:02/06/02 001.170.999.5281 41,132.80 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:O~/06/02 001.170.999.5262 27,761.47 76934 05/21/02 000406 RIVERSIOE GO SHERIFFS D LAN ENFORCEMENT P/E:02/06/02 001.170.999.5279 11,001.39 599,7'50.58 76935 05/21/02 000271 ROBERT DEIN b14 FROST & PRJT STUDY HEPT:I-15/79 SOUTH 210.165.662.5802 400.62 76935 05/21/02 000271 ROBERT BEIN ~a~ FROST & PRdT STUOY REPT:I-15/79 SOUTH 210.165.705.5802 149.38 550.00 VOUCHREZ CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 05/21/02 18:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER OATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER /~J4OUNT AMOUNT 76936 05/21/02 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. SCAG LEGISLATIVE BRIEFING:5/8 001.100.999.5258 41.00 41.00 76937 05/21/02 002226 RUSSO, ~RY ANNE TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190.183.999.5330 721.00 721.00 76938 05/21/0~ 004598 S T K ARCHITECTURE lNG OESIGN SVC:FIRE STN 92 PW01-11 210.165.7'33.5802 472.50 472.50 76939 05/21/02 001919 SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE FY01/02 CC~qM. SVC FUNDING AWRD 001.101.999.5267 5,000.00 5,000.00 76940 05/21/02 004814 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING APR PROF DESIGN SVCS:PW01-09 210.165.722.5802 700.00 700.00 76941 05/21/02 000645 SMART & FINAL INC RECREATION SUPPLIES:HIGH HOPES 1~0.18~.999.537~ 4~.44 76941 05/21/02 000645 S~L~RT & FINAL INC EMPLOYEE LUNCHEONS SUPPLIES 001.150.999.5265 138.18 76941 05/21/02 0006~5 S~L~RT & FINAL INC SNACKS"MAKE A DIFFERENCE DAYII 194.180.999.5265 T~.74 76941 05/21/02 0006~5 SMART & FINAL INC RECREATION SUPPLIES:FAMILY FUN 190.183.999.5371 28.25 76941 05/21/02 000645 S~ART & FINAL INC RECOGNITION PROGRAM:TCSD 194.180.999.5265 ;7.22 76941 05/21/02 000645 SMART & FINAL INC RECREATION SUPPLIES:H~GH HOPES 190.183.999.537~ 24.97 76941 05/21/02 0006~5 SMART & FINAL INC MISC SUPPLIES:FINANCE DEPT 001.140.999.5260 19.97 405.77 76942 05/21/02 004965 SMITH M.D., ~. BERUYN EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAM 001.150.999.5248 125.00 125.00 76943 05/21/02 SMITH, JOYCE ELLEN REFUND:CIATIOH 14157 001.170.4055 325.00 325.00 76944 05/21/02 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS NETERS 190.180.999.5240 10,387.43 76944 05/21/02 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-19-999-9442 VARIOUS METERS 190.180.999.5319 1,918.87 76944 05/21/02 000537 SO CALIF ED]SON APR 2-22-575-0934 PUJOL STREET 190.180.999.5240 2,352.77- 9,953.53 ?6945 05/21/02 001212 SO CALIF G~e~S COMPANY APR 021-725-0775-4 6TH STREET 190.181.999.5240 148.34 76945 05/21/02 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY APR 101-525-0950-0 PUJOL ST 190.184.999.5240 41.54 76945 05/21/02 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY APR 1~3-0~0-7373-0 FL~INT FAC 340.199.702.5240 45.39 ?6945 05/21/02 001212 SO CALIF OAS COMPANY APR 181-383-8881-6 MERCEDES ST 190.185.999.5240 18.48 253.75 ?6946 05/21/02 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SVCS:AGUAT1CS 190.186.999.5250 39.00 39.00 76947 05/21/02 004163 SPORTS CHALET BINOCULARS:BLDG & SAFETY 001.162.999.5242 438.74 76947 05/21/02 004163 SPORTS CHALET SALES TAX 001.162.999.5242 34.00 472.74 76948 05/21/02 004306 STENO SOLUTIONS TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES:POLICE 001.170.999.5250 257.28 257.28 76949 05/21/02 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES: CRC ACT 190.183.999.5320 42.57 76949 05/21/02 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPL]ES:NPSC 190.181.999.5301 39.68 76949 05/21/02 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES:AQUATICS 190.1~.999.5301 129.87 76949 05/21/02 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES: NPSC 190.181.999.5301 20.00 76949 05/21/02 000305 TARGET STORE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/F]LM:P~ 001.163.999.5220 10~.53 76949 05/21/02 000305 TARGET STORE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/EILM:P~ 001.165.999.5220 51.;7 76949 05/21/02 000305 TARGET STORE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/FIL~:P~ 001.164.604.5220 310.60 698.02 76950 05/21/02 TEMECULA LEARNING CENTE REFUND:SEC DEP:RENTAL MS013242 190.2900 100.00 100.00 76951 05/21/02 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY CERTIFICATE HOLDERS:CITY CLRK 001.120.999.5222 315.00 76951 05/21/02 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO~IPANY OIE SET UP CHARGE 001.120.999.5222 50.00 76951 05/21/02 00030? TEMECULA TROPNY COMPANY SALES TAX 001.120.999.5222 28.29 393.29 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIl)OS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK HUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT A~OUNT 76952 05/21/02 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER 'TALK/TC)~H" SEM:6/O6:DU/GT/KN 001.161.999.5260 90.00 90.00 76953 05/21/02 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER FY 01-02 FINAL QTRLY PAYMENT 001.111.999.5264 37,000.00 37,000.00 76954 05/21/02 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER:PNO0-16 210.190.158.5804 4,135.78 4,135.78 76955 05/21/02 004030 TEMECULA VOLUNTEER FIRE REIMB:VOL. SQUAD 8~ REPAIRS 001.171.999.5214 1,965.16 1,965.16 76956 05/21/02 003862 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR.B CITY HALL/MUSEUM MONTHLY 190.185.999.5250 166.67 76956 05/21/02 003862 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR.B CITY HALL/MUSEUM MONTHLY 340.199.701.5250 133.33 300.00 76957 05/21/02 003858 TOM RONEY ROOFING RESIDENT IMPROV PRGM:ROSE, M. 165.199.813.5804 2,710.00 2,710.00 76958 05/21/02 000320 TO'NE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:LAND DEV 001.163,999.5220 265.80 265.80 76959 05/21/02 001065 U S 0 M NEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001.2080 10,838.60 76959 05/21/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 OEF COMP 190.2080 1,630.96 76959 05/21/02 001065 U S C M NEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 192.2080 2.50 76959 05/21/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COHp 193.2080 131.00 76959 05/21/02 001065 U S C M NEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 194.2080 29.51 76959 05/21/02 001065 U S C M NEST (DEF COMP) 001065 OEF COMP 300.2080 88.54 76959 05/21/02 001065 U S C M WEST (OEF COMP) 001065 OEF COMP 320.2080 1,166.68 76959 05/21/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 340.2080 145.88 14,033.67 76960 05/21/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001.2160 578.04 76960 05/21/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165.2160 137.50 76960 05/21/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190.2160 1,235.17 76960 05/21/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RET[R 193.2160 24.57 76960 05/21/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 330.2160 21.34 76960 05/21/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) ' 000389 PT RETIR 340.2160 63.64 2,060,26 76961 05/21/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001.2120 214.80 76961 05/21/02 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UN 165.2120 7.50 76961 05/21/02 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UW 190.2120 27.00 76961 05/21/02 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 LI~ 192.2120 .05 76961 05/21/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 Ug 193.2120 1.80 76961 05/21/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194.2120 .65 76961 05/21/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280.2120 2.50 76961 05/21/02 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UN 340.2120 1.50 255.80 76962 05/21/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAY XXX-O073 GENERAL USAGE 320.199.999.5208 2,040.30 76962 05/21/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAY XXX-O074 GENERAL USAGE 320.199.999.5208 255.98 76962 05/21/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAY XXX-1603 CITY HALL 320.199.999.5208 89.57 76962 05/21/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAY XXX-3564 ALARM 320.199.999.5208 55.40 76962 05/21/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAY XXX-3923 STONE, J. 320.199.999.5208 27.57 2,468.82 76963 05/21/02 WHALERT, LYNN REFUND:WEED ABATEMENT SVCS 001.161.999.5440 470.00 470.00 76964 05/21/02 003756 NHITE HOUSE SANITATION APR HNTHLY SVC:BUTTERFIELD STG 190.180.999.5250 50.00 50.00 76965 05/21/02 WINDONS 2000 MAGAZINE 1YR SUBSCRIPTION:HAFEL[, T, 320.199.999.5228 49.95 49.95 VOUCHRE2 C%TY OF TE#ECULA PAGE 12 05/21/02 18:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AHOUNT 76966 05/21/02 WYMAN, MONICA REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190.183.4982 30.00 30.00 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL% XEROX COLOR COPIER JAN - 14ARCH 330.2800 323.53 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL% XEROX COLOR COPIER JAN - HARCH 330.199.999.5391 197.81 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX COLOR COPIER JAN - MARCH 330.199.999.5217 55.07 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX DC50 COLOR COPIES:3/O2 330.199.999.5217 1,956.29 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL% XEROX DCSO B&W COPIES:3/02 330.199.999.5217 22.34 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL% SALES TAX 330.199.999.5217 153.34 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL% XEROX POOLED COP%ER:TCSD 190.184..999.5239 113.75 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX pOOLED COPIERS:CITY HALL 330.2800 1,826.60 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX POOLED COPIERS:CITY HALL 330.199.999.5391 755.12 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL% XEROX POOLED COPIERS:CITY HALL 330.199.999.5217 1,8?5.18 76967 05/21/02 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER LEASE FOR STATION 8/, 001.171.999.5239 113.25 7,392.28 TOTAL CHECKS 2,3/,6,809.52 ITEM 4 APPROVAL ~2~-- CITY ATTORNEY f~v~ ~ DIRECTOR OF FIN~A~CE ,~. CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Financ~:~.~ DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2002 PREPARED BY: Karen JesteC~'~sstant Finance Director Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2002. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report which provides this information. The City's investment portforio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of April 30, 2002. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2002 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of April 30, 2002 Cash Activity for the Month of March: Cash and Investments as of Apdl 1, 2002 $ 66,589,135 Cash Receipts 4,453,346 Cash Disbursements (3,883,656) Cash and Investments as of April 30, 2002 $ 67,358,825 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Maturity/ Termination Par/Book Type of Investment institution Yield Date Balance Petty Cash City Hail n/a $ 1,500 General Checking Union Bank n/a 303,985 (1) Sweep Account Union Bank 0.800 % 499,540 (Money Market Account) (Highmark U.S. Treasury) Benefit Demand Deposits Union Bank n/a 427 (1) Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 2.845 % 58,652,785 (2) Certificate of Deposit Communily Bank 1.500 % 282,775 (Retention Escrow) Certificate of Deposit Bank of Sacramento n/a 125,900 (Retention Escrow) Checking Account Union Bank n/a 7,069 (Parking Citations) Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 1.500 % 368,241 · (Money Market Account) Reserve Account- CFD 88~12 CDC Funding Corp 5.430 % 9/1/2017 1,531,469 (Investment Agreement) Delinq. Main. Reserve Account- CFD 88.12 CDC Funding Corp 5.422 % 9/1/2017 500,000 (Investment Agreement) Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 1.590 % 1,350 (Money Market Account) Reserve Account- CFD 98-1 State Treasurer 2.845 % 916,715 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Trust Acceunts-TCSD COPs U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 1·500 % 9,378 (Money Market Account) Project Acceunt-TCSO COPs State Treasurer 2.845 % 2,686,163 (Investment Agreement) Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 1.500 % 22,608 (Money Market Account) Reserve Acceunt-RDA Bonds Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013 1,448,920 (Investment Agreement) $ 87,358,825 (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. (2)-At April 30, 2002 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $50,017,179,t70. The City's proportionate share of that value is $58,698,764. All investments are liquid and currently available. The City of Temecula's po~olio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the nexl six months. ITEM 5 APPROVAL 0//, ~ CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE DI R ECTO~R~/,~. ~-..- CITY MANAGER /r~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Records Destruction Approval PREPARED BY: Gwyn R. Flores, Records Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain City records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with State of California Government Code, Sections 34090 through 34090.7. Attached Exhibit A, lists various records from the Finance Department and has been imaged and identified within Groups IV & V of the Records Retention Schedule as outlined in attached Exhibit A. The imaging of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 340903.5. Attached Exhibit B, lists various records from the Building & Safety Department and has been imaged and identified within Groups IV of the Records Retention Schedule as outlined in attached Exhibit A. The imaging of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 340903.5. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed the Exhibits, as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATrACHMENTS: Destruction of Records Request, Finance Department Exhibit A, List of Records recommended for destruction Destruction of Records Request, Building & Safety Department Exhibit B, List of Records recommended for destruction TO: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk FROM: Gwyn R. Flores, Records Coordinator DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Request for Destruction of Records Attached is a listing of records maintained in the Finance Department that has been imaged into the City's LaserFiche Imaging System and is eligible for destruction in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Retention Policy. The imaging of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5 The attached list of records has been identified within Retention Groups IV and V, as outlined in "Exhibit 1", Schedule A, of Resolution No. 92-17. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. Department Head: Ge e ~)ate City Attorney: R:\forms~dest~ct.rqs EXHIBIT "A' CITY OF TEMECULA RECORDS MANAGEMENT DESTRUCTION FILE REPORT Bocument Date Item Brief File Reference~ Storage Media Reference Reference DescriptJen Security Class Storage Location 140 91/92 Box 12 Budget, Revenue, 401-02/Group IV LaserFiche General & Journal Journal Enb'ies 140 12289-01/96 Box 51 Revoked Business 402-03/Group IV LaserFiche Lincense A-L 140 94~5 Box 68 Cash Receipts 402-022Group IV LaserFiche 140 91/92 Box 82 Timesheets 404.04/Group IV LaserFiche 92/93 14;0 95/96 BOx 85 Timesheets 404-041Group IV LaserFiche 140 95 BOx 88 Leave Bank Reports 404-06/Group IV Laser Fiche PERS Summary Check Generalion 7/95-12295 Payroll Reports 140 96/97 Box 123 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFiche Wire Transfer 140 96/97 Box 124 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFiche Wire Transfer 140 96197 Box 125 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFiche Wire Transfer 140 96/97 BOx 126 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFiche Wire Transfer 140 96/97 Box 127 Cash Receipts 402-022Group IV LaserFiche Wire Transfer 140 96/97 BOx 128 Cash Receipts 402.022Group IV LaasrFiche Wire Transfer 140 95196 Box 186 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFiche 140 95/96 Box 187 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LasenCiche 140 95/96 Box 188 Cash Receipts 402q)2/Group IV LaserFiche 140 95/96 BOx 189 Cash Receipts 402-022Group IV LaserFiche 140 95/96 BOx 190 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFi~e 140 95/96 BOx 191 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserF~he 140 97 Box 244 Cash Receipts 402-02/Grenp IV LasenCicfle 140 97 Box 245 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFiche 140 97 Box 246 Cash Receipts 402-022Group IV LaserFiche 140 97 Box 247 Cash Receipts 402.02/Group IV LaserFiche 140 97 Box 248 Cash Receipts 402-022Group IV LaserFiche 140 97 Box 249 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFiche 140 97 Box 250 Cash Receipts 402-02/Group IV LaserFiche TO: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk FROM: Gwyn R. Flores, Records Coordinator DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Request for Destruction of Records Attached is a listing of records maintained in the Building and Safety Department that has been imaged into the City's LaserFiche Imaging System and is eligible for destruction in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Retention Policy. The imaging of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5 The attached list of records has been identified within Retention Group IV, as outlined in "Exhibit 1", Schedule A, of Resolution No. 92-17. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. Department Tony & Safety ~)ate City Attorney: R:\forms\destract.rqs EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF TEMECULA RECORDS MANAGEMENT OESTRUCTION FILE REPORT Document Date Item Brief FiFe Reference# Storage Media Reference Reference Description Security Class Storage Location 162 Various Boxes Residential & 805-07 LaserFiche 1,2,3,8,9,10, Commemial 11,12,13,14, Building Permits 15,16,17,18, 19,20,21,22, (list attached) 23 TRACT 24185 LOTS 1 & 2 LOTS 87-90 32831 ABANA CT. 32839 ABANA CT. 32847 ABANA CT. 32848 ABANA CT. 32855 ABANA CT. 32856 ABANA CT. 32862 ABANA CT. 32863 ABANA CT. 32871 ABANA CT. 32872 ABANA CT. 32873 ABANA CT. 32875 ABANA CT. 42023 ACACIA WY. 32879 ADELANTE ST. 32882 ADELANTE sT. 32883 ADELANTE ST. 32886 ADELANTE ST. 32889 ADELANTE ST. 32892 ADELANTE ST. 32897 ADELANTE ST. 32900 ADELANTE ST. 32913 ADELANTE ST. 32914 ADELANTE ST. 32916 ADELANTE ST. 32941 ADELANTE ST. 33000 ADELANTE ST. 33001 ADELANTE ST. 42130 AGENA ST. 43655 ALCOBA DR. 43671 ALCOBA DR. 43699 ALCOBA DR. 43716 ALCOBA DR. 43726 ALCOBA DR. 43858 ALCOBA DR. 40168 AI.F. XANDRIA 40177 ALEXANDRIA 43720 ALTAMURA CT. 43080 ALTUMURA CT. 43080 AMAR1TA WY. 39805 AMBERLY CR. 40000 AMBERLY CR. 39556 APRIL DR. 41423 ASI-IBURN RD. 41453 ASHBURN RD. 'l 32876 ABANA CT. 41478 ASHBURN RD. 41473 ASHBURN RD. 31373 ASHMILL CT. 33287 AVENIDA BICICLETA 30670 AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE 31039 AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE 31039 AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE 31085 AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE 29878 AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL 29690 AVENIDA DE CALZADA 29765 AVENIDA DE CALZADA 43225 AVENIDA DE SAN PASQUAL 43225 AVENIDA SAN PASQUAL 29894 AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL 31090 AVENIDA DEL REPOSO 31278 AVENIDA DEL REPOSO 31289 AVENIDA DEL REPOSO 31345 AVENIDA DEL REPOSO 31590 AVENIDA DEL REPOSO 31635 AVENIDA DEL REPOSO 44739 AVITA CR. 40834 BACCARAT RD. 30845 BALATA DR. 30882 BALATA DR. 42248 BALDARAY CR. 39731 BARBERRY CT. 43129 BARSANTI DR. 43952 BARLETTA ST. 43140 BARSANTI DR. 41440 BELLERIVE CT. 41445 BELLERIVE DR. 41455 BELLERIVE CT. 41460 BELLERIVE DR. 41465 BELLERIVE CT. 43113 BELLOTA CT. 43153 BELLOTA CT. 43172 BELLOTA CT. 41466 BIG SAGE CT. 41610 BIG SAGE CT. 41635 BIG SAGE CT. 41696 BIG SAGE CT. 43095 BLACKDEER LOOP 30440 BOGART PL. 30464 BOGART PL. 27485 BOLANDRA CT. ' 32817 BONITA MESA ST. 32511 BERGAMO CT. 32825 BONTIA ~ESA ST. 32907 BONTIA MESA ST. 41765 BRANDELIS CR. 30790 BRANFORD DR. 30800 BRANFORD DR. 30810 BRANFORD DR. 30820 BRANFORD DR. 30830 BRANFORD DR. 30835 BRANFORD DR. 30840 BRANFORD DR. 30850 BRANFORD DR. 30860 BRANFORD DR. 30870 BRANFORD DR. 30880 BRANFORD DR. 41285 BRAVOS CT. 41294 BRAVOS CT. 41305 BRAVOS CT. 41314 BRAVOS CT. 41324 BRAVOS CT. 41337 BRAVOS CT. 41344 BRAVOS CT. 41365 BRAVOS CT. 31400 BRITTON CR. 43232 BROOKWAY DR. 43255 BROOKWAY DR. 43248 BROOKWAY DR. 43287 BROOKWAY DR. 43279 BROOKWAY DR. 43726 BUCKEYE RD. 31539 BUNKERS WY. 31559 BUNKERS WY. 31532 BUNKERS WY. 41760 BRANDELIS CR. 31542 BUNKERS WY. 31552 BUNKERS WY. 31562 BUNKERS WY. 31569 BUNKERS WY. 31572 BUNKERS WY. 31582 BUNKERS WY. 31592 BUNKERS WY. 31600 BUNKERS WY. 31602 BUNKERS WY. 31612 BUNKERS WY. 31619 BUNKERS WY. 31622 BUNKERS WY. 31629 BUNKERS WY. 31632 BUNKERS WY. 31639 BUNKERS WY. 31649 BUNKERS WY. 40976 BURGESS CT. 41003 BURGESS CT. 41019 BURGESS CT. 41027 BURGESS CT. 41035 BURGESS CT. 41040 BURGESS CT. 43846 B~RNUT DR. 30105 CABRILLO AVE. 42945 CALA ROSSO 32126 CALA TORRENTE 42019 CALABRIA DR. 42027 CALABI~IA DR. 42032 CALABRIA DR. 42035 CALABRIA DR. 42040 CALABRIA DR. 43694 CALABRO ST. 32281 CALLE BAI.F~REZA 31934 CALLE BALLENTE 31987 CALLE BALI.F. NTE 33333 CAI,I.E CANTU 33357 CAI.I.E CANTU 30081 CAI,I.E CARRANZA 41820 CALLE CEDRAL 41995 CAI .1 ~E CEDRAL 31900 CAI Jl ~E CHAPOS 43394 CALLE DE VELARDO 43399 CA! .! .F. DE VELARDO 43677 CALLE DE VELARDO 43775 CALLE DE VELARDO 43845 CALLE DE VELARDO 44013 CALLE DE VELARDO 31940 CALLE ESPINOZA 31983 CAI.I.E ESPINOZA 31260 CALLE FELIC1DAD 40473 CALLE FIESTA 40512 CAI J,F. FIESTA 48481 CAI J.l~ FIESTA 30969 CALLE FUENTE 30970 C/~I J.F. FUENTE 30979 CAI J JE FUENTE 30980 CAL[ J J:. FUENTE 31605 CAI J.E GIRASOL 30365 CAI J ~F~ HALCON 40358 CAI J,E KATHERINE 40445 C/~I J.F. KATHERINE 31593 CALLE LOS PADRES 43154 CAIJ.F, MATARO 41403 CAI.I.F, TAJO 40482 CALLE MEDUSA 40472 CAI.I,F. TIARA 43331 CALLE MORITA 40560 CAI J ,R TIARA 43333 CALLE MORITA 40300 CAI.I,F, TORCIDA 43379 CALLE MORITA 40630 CALLE TORCIDA 43463 CALLE MORITA 40670 CALLE TORCIDA 43407 CALLE NACIDO 42883 CAMINO ALAGON 43480 CALLE NACIDO 32122 CAMINO CALIARI 30592 CALLE P1NA COLADA 40290 CAMINO CAMPOS VERDE 30787 CALLE PINA COLADA 40320 CAMINO CAMPOS VERDE 30879 CALLE PINA COLADA 43259 CAMINO CARUNA 30909 CAI J,F. PINA COLADA 32025 CAMINO HERENCIA 30939 CALLE PINA COLADA 32030 CAMINO HERENCIA 30949 CALLE PINA COLADA 32035 CAMINO HERENCIA 32178 CAMINO NLrNEZ 43182 CAMINATA 32271 CAMINO NUNEZ 43189 CAMINATA 30999 CAMINO VERDE 43189 CAMINATA 31965 CAI.I.E VIMIANOZO 43192 CAMINATA 30196 CAMINO VERDE 40330 CAMINO CAMPOS VERDE 43122 CAMINATA 32271 CAMINO NUNEZ 43129 CAMINATA 31047 CAMINO DEL ESTE 43132 CAMINATA 27558 CAMPANA 43141 CAMINATA 32410 CAMPO DR. 43142 CAMINATA 32416 CAMPO DR. 43152 CAMINATA 32417 CAMPO DR 32422 CAMPO DR. 32425 CAMPO DR. 32428 CAMPO DR. 32433 CAMPO DR. 32434 CAMPO DR. 32441 CAMPO DR. 32442 CAMPO DR. 32441 CAMPO DR. 32449 CAMPO DR. 32450 CAMPO DR. 32457 CAMPO DR. 32458 CAMPO DR. 32465 CAMPO DR. 32466 CAMPO DR. 32487 CAMPO DR. 31344 CANTERBURY CT. 31353 CANTERBURY CT. 39700 CANTRELL RD. 30222 CAPRICE CT. 29553 CARA WY. 43846 CARINI CT. 43850 CARINI WY. 43851 CARINI CT. 43856 CARINI CT. 43861 CARINI CT. 43862 CARINI CT. 43868 CARINI CT. 43871 CARINI CT. 43874 CARINI CT. 40573 CHANTEMAR WY. 41642 CHENIN BLANC 31377 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31392 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31408 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31409 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31410 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31416 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31417 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31424 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31425 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31433 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31434 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 31441 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 41040 CHEMIN CHEVALIER 41050 CHEMIN CI-IEVALIER 41060 CHEMIN COUTET 41062 CHEMIN COUTET 41070 CHEMIN COUTET 41080 CHEMIN COUTET 41081 CHEMIN COUTET 41091 CHEMIN COUTET 41111 CHEMIN COUTET 41121 CHEMIN COUTET 41131 CHEMIN COUTET 41141 CHEM1N COUTET 41771 CARLETON WY. 41785 CARI,F, TON WY. 41793 CARL,ETON WY. 41845 CARLETON WY. 41907 CARl.ETON WY. 41910 CARl,ETON WY. 40346 CARMELITA CIR. 40789 CARMELITA CIR. 32955 CASALA CT. 32956 CASALA CT. 32963 CASALA CT. 32964 CASALA CT. 32971 CASALA CT. 32972 CASALA CT. 32979 CASALA CT. 32980 CASALA CT. 32987 CASALA CT. 32988 CASALA CT. 32996 CASALA CT. 32997 CASALA CT. 33002 CASALA CT. 33005 CASALA CT. 33012 CASALA CT. 33013 CASALA CT. 32440 CASSINO CT. 32447 CASSINO CT. 32467 CASSINO CT. 32732 CASTANA DR. 32281 CERCLE BEAUREGARD 31828 CERCLE BEAUREGARD 31852 CERCLE CHAMBERTIN ( 31861 CERCLE CHAMBERTIN 32349 CERCLE LATOUR 32944 CESENA ST. 32945 CESENA ST. 32971 CESENA ST. 40567 CHANTEMAR WY. 40573 CHANTEMAR WY. 27102 CHERRYGROVE CT. 42010 CHESTNUT DR. 42026 CHESTNUT DR. 42057 CHESTNUT DR. 42074 CHESTNUT DR. 42125 CHESTNUT DR. 42155 CHESTNUT DR. 43369 CHICO DR. 30280 CHURCHII.L CT. 45760 CLUBHOUSE DR. 30360 COLINA VERDE 30546 COLINA VERDE 27480 COLT CT. 30445 COLVER CT. 31206 COMOTILO CT. 31218 COMOTILO CT. 31391 CONGRESSIONAL DR. ' 31420 CONGRESSIONAL DR. 31441 CONGRESSIONAL DR. 31451 CONGRESSIONAL DR. 31470 CONGRESSIONAL DR. 31675 CORDOBA 43881 CORONADO DR. 31845 CORTE ALGETE 43310 CORTE ALMERIA 43120 CORTE ALMONTE 43795 CORTE AMAYA 31011 CORTE ANACAPA 31060 CORTE ANZA 32084 CORTE ESCOBAR 33460 CORTE FIGUEROA 32128 CORTE FLORECITA 43091 CORTE FRESCA 41653 CORTE HIOUERA 41839 CORTE LARA 32359 CORTE LAS CRUCES 32365 CORTE LAS CRUCES 32402 CORTE LAS CRUCES 33491 CORTE MANGARINO 31406 CORTE MONTIEL 43245 CORTE MONTILLA 31600 CORTE PADRERA 31632 CORTE PADRERA 32301 CORTE PALACIO 32342 CORTE PALACIO 32262 CORTE PARADO 41557 CORTE PERAGAMINO 33506 CORTE PORFIRIO 31909 CORTE POSITAS 31900 CORTE PRIEGO 31430 CORTE RIMOLA 45049 CORTE ROSA 31750 CORTE ROSARIO 31771 CORTE ROSARIO 31548 CORTE SALINAS 44635 CORTE SAN GABRIEL 29990 CORTE SAN LUIS 30060 CORTE SAN LUIS 32302 CORTE SAN VINCENTE 32396 CORTE SAN VINCENTE 41565 CORTE SED)k 44895 CORTE SIERRA 43153 CAMINATA 43165 CAMINATA 43172 CAMINATA 43177 CAMINATA 31717 CAI J.F. REDONDELA 43001 CAI J.F. REVA 31084 CORTE ANZA 31135 CORTE ANZA 43269 CORTE ARGENTO 43221 CORTE ARGENTO 43269 CORTE ARGENTO 43156 CORTE ASTORGA 43550 CORTE AYALA 32046 CORTE BACARRO 42993 CORTE CABRERA 43017 CORTE CABRERA 43094 CORTE CABRERA 45084 CORTE CAMELIA 30226 CORTE CANTANIA 31985 CORTE CARDIN 32204 CORTE CARMEI.A 32129 CORTE CARMONA 30040 CORTE COELHO 30110 CORTE COELHO 30266 CORTE COELHO 30273 CORTE COELHO 30276 CORTE COELHO 30289 CORTE COELHO 42965 CORTE COLUCCI 32340 CORTE CORNADO 32130 CORTE SOLEDAD 31357 CORTE SONORA 29891 CORTE TOLANO 43161 CORTE TOLOSA 31375 CORTE TUNAS 45036 CORTE VAI J .E 43128 CORTE VILLA 42347 CORTE VILLOSA 33239 CORTE YACA 32420 CORTE ZAMORA COSMIC DR. 42461 COSMIC DR. 41058 COUR CITRAN 41065 COUR CITRAN 41066 COUR CITRAN 41073 COUR CITRAN 41074 COUR CITRAN 41081 COUR CITRAN 41082 COUR CITRAN 41089 COUR CITRAN 41090 COUR CITRAN 39799 CREATIVE DR. 41170 CROOKED STICK DR. 30770 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30776 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30782 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30788 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30794 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30800 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30806 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30812 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30818 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30824 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30830 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30836 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30854 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30858 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30862 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30866 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30870 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30874 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30878 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 31490 CULBERTSON LN. 30882 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30898 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30956 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30962 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 30910 CRYSTALAIRE DR. 31413 CULBERTSON LN. 31485 CULBERTSON LN. 31509 CULBERTSON LN. 31530 CULBERTSON LN. 31557 CULBERTSON LN. 31580 CULBERTSON LN. 44750 CUPA LN. 30221 CUPENO LN. 30250 CUPENO LN. 42000 DAHLIA WY. 42015 DAHLIA WY. 42020 DAHLIA WY. 42028 DAHLIA WY. 42031 DAHLIA WY. 42036 DAHLIA WY. 42044 DAHLIA WY. 42047 DAHLIA WY. 42052 DAHLIA WY. 42060 DAHLIA WY. 42068 DAHLIA WY. ~ 42076 DAHLIA WY. 42081 DAHLIA WY. 42084 DAHLIA WY. 42089 DAHLIA WY. 42090 DAHLIA WY. 42092 DAHLIA WY. 42097 DAHLIA WY. 30655 DE PORTOLA RD. 3141! DE PORTOLA RD. 41837 DEEPWOOD CR. 30407 DEER MEADOW RD. 30480 DEER MEADOW RD. 29665 DEL REY RD. 29684 DEL REY RD. 30011 DEL REY RD, 30383 DEL REY RD. 30625 DEL REY RD. 30903 DEL REY RD. 31000 DEL REY RD. 41965 DEL MONTE ST. 41977 DELMONTE ST, 42041 DELMONTE ST. 42073 DELMONTE ST. 42175 DELMONTE ST. 43304 DODARO DR. 43312 DODARO DR. 43320 DODARO DR. 43328 DODARO DR. 43336 DODARO DR. 43344 DODARO DR. 43352 DODARO DR, 43453 DODARO DR. 43461 DODARO DR, 43486 DODARO DR. 43493 DODARO DR. 43485 DODARO DR. 43477 DODARO DR. 43469 DODARO DR. 43495 DODARO DR. 31171 DOG LEG CR. 41533 EAGLE POINT WY. 30921 EAGI,F, CT. 43675 EL FARO PL. 33269 ELIZABETH RD. 33270 ELIZABETH RD. 33289 ELIZABETH RD, 33290 ELIZABETH RD. 33299 ELIZABETH RD. 33319 ELIZABETH RD. 33333 ELIZABETH RD. 33340 ELIZABETH. RD 45371 ESALANTE CT. 41223 ESSEX CT. 30553 ESTERO ST. 32451 FAVARA DR. 32575 FAVARA DR. 32635 FAVARA DR. 30690 FEATHER CT. 30700 FEATHER CT. 31228 FELIC1TA RD. 28464 FELIX VALDEZ RD. 28545 FELIX VAl.DEZ RD. 32852 FERMO CT. 31110 FIRESTONE ST. 31111 FIRESTONE ST. 31121 FIRESTONE ST. 31122 FIRESTONE ST. 31131 FIRESTONE ST. 31134 FIRESTONE ST. 31141 FIRESTONE ST. 31146 FIRESTONE ST. 31158 FIRESTONE ST. 31170 FIRESTONE ST. 31182 FIRESTONE ST. 31194 FIRESTONE ST. 31206 FIRESTONE ST. 31213 FIRESTONE ST. 31216 FIRESTONE ST. 31226 FIRESTONE ST. 31233 FIRESTONE ST. 31236 FIRESTONE ST. 31246 FIRESTONE ST. 31256 FIRESTONE ST. 31268 FIRESTONE ST. 31280 FIRESTONE ST. 31292 FIRESTONE ST. 43909 FONDI CT. 33085 FOX RD. 33091 FOX RD. 33130 FOX RD. 33140 FOX RD. 33163 FOX RD. 33187 FOX RD. 33211 FOX RD. 33219 FOX RD. 33227 FOX RD. 33258 FOX RD. 33335 FOX RD. 33438 FOX RD. 33450 FOX RD. 32559 GABBIANO DR. 32571 GABBIANO DR. 32583 GABBIANO DR. 32595 GABBIANO DR. 32607 GABBIANO DR. 32619 GABBIANO DR. 32631 GABBIANO DR. 32643 GABBIANO DR. 32356 GARDEN VAIL DR. 29756 GENERAL KEARNY RD. 39859 N. GENERAL KEARNY RD. 39863 N. GENERAL KEARNY RD. 39867 N. GENERAL KEARNY RD. 40356 N. GENERAL KEARNY RD. 40611 N. GENERAL KEARNY RD. 40613 N. GENERAL KEARNY RD. 29523 GEORGETOWN LN. 29532 GEORGETOWN LN. 31240 GLENEAGLES DR. 31245 GLENEAGLES DR. 31250 GLENEAGLES DR. 31255 GLENEAGLES DR. 31264 GLENEAGLES DR. 31265 GLENEAGLES DR. 31275 GLENEAGLES DR. 31276 GLENEAGLES DR. 31285 GLENEAGLES DR. 31288 GLENEAGLES DR. 31295 GLENEAGLES DR. 31305 GLENEAGLES DR. 31313 GLENEAGLES DR. 27104 GREENSTONE ST. 27104 GREENSTONE ST. 27107 GREENSTONE ST. 27124 GREENS TONE ST. 27127 GREENSTONE ST. 27144 GREENSTONE ST. 27144 GREENSTONE ST. 27147 GREENSTONE ST. 27163 GREENSTONE ST. 27179 GREENSTONE ST. 27195 GREENSTONE ST. 41825 GREEN TREE RD. 30554 GREENWAY CR. 32440 GUEVARA DR. 32463 GUEVARA DR. 32464 GUEVARA DR. 32501 GUEVARA DR. 32496 GUEVARA DR. 32504 GUEVARA DR. 32513 GUEVARA DR. 32516 GUEVARA DR. 32525 GUEVARA DR. 32537 GUEVARA DR. 32573 GUEVARA DR. 32633 GUEVARA DR. 32645 GUEVARA DR. 32648 GUEVARA DR. 32657 GUEVARA DR. 32669 GUEVARA DR. 32681 GUEVARA DR. 32684 GUEVARA DR. 39870 GUEVARA DR. 42109 HUMBER DR. BOX 8 27139 JEFFERSON AVE. 27260 JEFFERSON AVE. 27270 JEFFERSON AVE. 5- 27280 JEFFERSON AVE.~3 27281 JEFFERSON AVE. 4 27300 JEFFERSON AVE. 27300 JEFFERSON AVE. # B 27309 JEFFERSON AVE. 27311 JEFFERSON AVE. ~bo 27313 JEFFERSON AyE. 27314 JEFFERSON AVE. #5 & 6 12. 27315 JEFFERSON AVE. 27326 JEFFERSON AVE./40 27338 JEFFERSON AVE. 27345 JEFFERSON AVE. 2_2- 27345 JEFFERSON AVE. 27348 JEFFERSON AVE. 13 27355 JEFFERSON AVE. 27349 JEFFERSON AVE. 13 27363 JEFFERSON AVE.~ 27364 JEFFERSON AVE. /0 -,c5"4-I 27364 JEFFERSON AVE. 27365 JEFFERSON AVE. q. 27371 JEFFERSON AVE. I"7 27378 JEFFERSON AVE. G, 27403 JEFFERSON AVE. 27405 JEFFERSON AVE. '7 27410 JEFFERSON AVE. 27415 JEFFERSON AVE. 3 27420 JEFFERSON AVE. 27423 JEFFERSON AVE. '7 27433 JEFFERSON AVE. 27435 JEFFERSON AVE. '7 27443 JEFFERSON AVE. 27445 JEFFERSON AVE, 5--k 1 27452 JEFFERSON AVE. 27455 JEFFERSON AVE. 12. 27457 JEFFERSON AVE. 27459 JEFFERSON AVE. [.p 27469 JEFFERSON AVE. 27470 JEFFERSON AVE. ~g 27472 JEFFERSON AVE. 27475 JEFFERSON AVE. /4- ~- I 27485 JEFPERSON AVE. 27489 JEFFERSON AVE. 10 27495 JEFFERSON AVE. 27496 JEFFERSON AVE. t.J 27500 JEFFERSON AVE. 27501 JEFFERSON AVE. Zo 27515 JEFFERSON AVE. 27523 JEFFERSON AVE. It, ~ I -r 4q 27525 JEFFERSON AVE. 27531 JEFFERSON AVE. 7--- 27537 JEFFERSON AVE. 27560 JEFFERSON AVE. i6, 27590 JEFFERSON AVE. 27600 JEFFERSON AVE. (7 27612 JEFFERSON AVE. 27622 JEFFERSON AVE. '7 27624 JEFFERSON AVE. 27625 JEFFERSON AVE. '2_~- q:'/ ~- 2- 27626 JEFFERSON AVE. 27635 JEFFERSON AVE. 79-- 27645 JEFFERSON AVE. 27655 JEFFERSON AVE. Z(,,, 27660 JEFFERSON AVE. 27665 JEFFERSON AVE. 5' 27672 JEFFERSON AVE. 27675 JEFFERSON AVE. 7_- 27685 JEFFERSON AVE. 27690 JEFFERSON AVE. 9- 27696 JEFFERSON AVE. 27700 JEFFERSON AVE. 9.0 27706 JEFFERSON AVE. 27710 JEFFERSON AVE. {g 27713 JEFFERSON AVE. 27715 JEFFERSON AVE. ~4-/v I 27717 JEFFERSON AVE. 27725 JEFFERSON AVE. 6~:)- 27727 JEFFERSON AVE. 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. ~{ te,'l'h 27780 JEFFERSON AVE. 28011 JEFFERSON AVE. 42130 LYNDJE LN. 42225 LYNDIE LN. 42270 LYND[E LN. 42140 LyNDIE LN. 42145 LYNDIE LN. 42172 LYNDIE LN. 42190 LYNDIE LN. 42160 LYNDIE LN. 42210 LYNDIE LN. 27135 LYNDIE LN. 27230 MADISON AVE. 27250 MADISON AVE. 27259 ½ MADISON AVE. 27364 V2 MADISON AVE. 41887 MAIN ST. 41910 MAIN ST. 41920 MAIN ST. 41934 MAIN ST. 41950 MAIN ST. 41953 MAIN ST. 41955 MAIN ST. 41964 MAIN ST. 41971 MAIN ST. 42012 MAIN ST. 42030 MAIN ST. 42031 MAIN ST. 42049 MAIN ST. 42050 MAIN ST. 42061 MAIN ST. 42081 MAIN ST. 42100 MAIN ST. 42221 MAIN ST. 42231 MAIN ST. BOX 9 27301 MARGARITA RD. 29119 MARGARITA RD. 29275 MARGARITA RD. 29280 MARGARITA RD. 29382 MARGARITA RD. 29545 MARGARITA RD. 29575 MARGARITA RD. 29860 MARGARITA RD. 30140 MARGARITA RD. 30142 MARGARITA RD. 30290 MARGARITA RD. 30300 MARGARITA RD. 30302 MARGARITA RD. 39834 MARGARITA RD. 39836 MARGARITA RD. 39950 MARGARITA RD. 39954 MARGARITA RD. 40045 MARGARITA RD. 40490 MARGARITA RD. 40801 MARGARITA RD. 41205 MARGARITA RD. 41347 MARGARITA RD. 41544 MARGARITA RD. 41554 MARGARITA RD. 41564 MARGARITA RD. 41574 MARGARITA RD. 41582 MARGARITA RD. 41584 MARGARITA RD. 41594 MARGARITA RD. 41604 MARGARITA RD. 41614 MARGARITA RD. 41624 MARGARITA RD. 41630 MARGARITA RD. 41634 MARGARITA RD. 41644 MARGARITA RD. 41654 MARGARITA RD. 41664 MARGARITA RD. 41674 MARGARITA RD. 41684 MARGARITA RD. 41694 MARGARITA RD. 41704 MARGARITA RD. 41714 MARGARITA RD. 41724 MARGARITA RD. 41734 MARGARITA RD. 41744 MARGARITA RD. 41754 MARGARITA RD. 41770 MARGARITA RD.#18 41770 MARGARITA RD. #1073 41770 MARGARITA RD. #19 41801 MARGARITA RD. 41804 MARGARITA RD. 41805 MARGARITA RD. 41841 MARGARITA RD. 41844 MARGARITA RD. 41848 MARGARITA RD. 41846 MARGARITA RD. 41926 MARGARITA RD. 41930 MARGARITA RD. 4195:~ MARGARITA RD. 41959 MARGARITA RD. 41961 MARGARITA RD. 41965 MARGARITA RD. 41969 MARGARITA RD. 41971 MARGARITA RD. 41975 MARGARITA RD. 41979 MARGARITA RD. 41981 MARGARITA RD. 41985 MARGARITA RD. 41989 MARGARITA RD. 41991 MARGARITA RD. 41992 MARGARITA RD. 41995 MARGARITA RD. 41999 MARGARITA RD. 42001 MARGARITA RD. 42005 MARGARITA RD. 42009 MARGARITA RD. 42057 MARGARITA RD. 42063 MARGARITA RD. 42659 MARGARITA RD. 42690 MARGARITA RD. 42775 MARGARITA RD. 43049 MARGARITA RD. 43053 MARGARITA RD.# 109 & 110 43053 MARGARITA RD. B-104 43053 MARGARITA RD.B-103 43057 MARGARITA RD.gl03&104 43057 MARGARITA RD.C-101 43120 MARGARITA RD. 43124 MARGARITA RD. 43153 MARGARITA RD. 43215 MARGARITA RD. 43141 MARGARITA RD. 43298 MARGARITA RD. 43982 MARGARITA RD. 44060 MARGARITA RD. 44155 MARGARITA RD. 44159 MARGARITA RD. 44200 MARGARITA RD. 44239 MARGARITA RD. 43438 MARGARITA RD. 41375 MCCABE CT. 28314 MERCEDES ST. 42004 MORAGA RD. 42008 MORAGA RD. 42010 MORAGA RD. 42012 MORAGA RD. 42014 MORAGA RD. 42016 MORAGA RD. 42018 MORAGA RD. 42020 MORAGA RD. 42036 MORAGA RD. 42042 MORAGA RD. 42048 MORAGA RD. 42052 MORAGA RD. 42054 MORAGA RD. 42056 MORAGA RD. 42058 MORAGA RD. 42060 MORAGA RD. 42062 MORAGA RD. 42066 MORAGA RD. 42068 MORAGA RD. 42072 MORAGA RD. 42074 MORAGA RD. 42078 MORAGA RD. 42080 MORAGA RD. 42082 MORAGA RD. 42084 MORAGA RD. 42086 MORAGA RD. 42090 MORAGA RD. 42092 MORAGA RD. 42094 MORAGA RD. 42096 MORAGA RD. 42098 MORAGA RD. 42100 MORAGA RD. 42101 MORAGA RD. 42102 MORAGA RD. 42104 MORAGA RD. 42106 MORAGA RD. 42108 MORAGA RD. 42112 MORAGA RD. 42114 MORAGA RD. 42116 MORAGA RD. 42118 MORAGA RD. 42120 MORAGA RD. 42122 MORAGA RD. 42124 MORAGA RD. 42126 MORAGA RD. i 42128 MORAGA RD. 42130 MORAGA RD. 42132 MORAGA RD. 42134 MORAGA RD. 42136 MORAGA RD. 42138 MORAGA RD. 42140 MORAGA RD. 42142 MORAGA RD. 42144 MORAGA RD. 42146 MORAGA RD. 42148 MORAGA RD. 42152 MORAGA RD. 42156 MORAGA RD. 42160 MORAGA RD. 42162 MORAGA RD. 42164 MORAGA RD. 42166 MORAGA RD. 42168 MORAGA RD. 42170 MORAGA RD. 42172 MORAGA RD. 42174 MORAGA RD. 42176 MORAGA RD. 42178 MORAGA RD. 42180 MORAGA RD. 42184 MORAGA RD. 42186 MORAGA RD. 42188 MORAGA RD. 42192 MORAGA RD. 42192 MORAGA RD. 42194 MORAGA RD. 42196 MORAGA RD. 42204 MORAGA RD. 42212 MORAGA RD. 42216 MORAGA RD. 42220 MORAGA RD. 42222 MORAGA RD. 42224 MORAGA RD. 42226 MORAGA RD. 42228 MORAGA RD. 42230 MORAGA RD. 42232 MORAGA RD. 42234 MORAGA RD. 42236 MORAGA RD. 42240 MORAGA RD. 42244 MORAGA RD. 42246 MORAGA RD. 41919 MORAGA RD. SUITE D 41919 MORAGA RD. SUITE E 41841 MORAGA RD. 41873 MORAGA RD. 41864 MORAGA RD. 41900 MORAGA RD. 41920 MORAGA RD. 41941 MORAGA RD. 41963 MORAGA RD. 41970 MORAGA RD. 41841 MORAGA RD. 41872 MORAGA RD. 41895 MOTOR CAR PKWY. 41902 MOTOR CAR PKWY. 41915 MOTOR CAR PKWY. 41922 MOTOR CAR PKWY. 41925 MOTOR CAR PKWY. BOX 10 42035 2~'~ ST. 41923 2~ ST. · 41965 3~t~ ST. 41920 6TM ST. 41915 4TM ST. 41920 6TM ST. SUITE A. 41920 6TM ST. SUITE B. 41992 AVENIDA ALVARDO 42030 AVENIDA ALVARDO 42066 AVENIDA ALVARDO 42387 AVENIDA ALVARDO 42387 AVENIDA ALVARDO 41397 BUECKING DR. 44535 BEDFORD CT. 43095 BLACKDEER LOOP 43095 BLACKDEER LOOP 43095 BLACKDEER LOOP 43135 BLACKDEER LOOP 27432 BOSTIK CT. 27460 BOSTIK CT. 41437 BUECKING DR. 41437 BUECKING DR. 41915 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43105 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43172 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43174 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43176 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43180 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43180 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43200 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43210 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43218 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43218 BUSINESS PARK DR. SUITE 201 43218 BUSINESS PARK DR. # 108 43218 BUSINESS PARK DR. # 106 43234 BUSINESS PARK DR. # 101 43234 BUSINESS PARK DR. # 106' 43250 BUSINESS PARK DR. # 104 43260 BUSINESS PARK DR. # 201 43264 BUSINESS PARK DR. # 108 43280 BUSINESS PARK DR. # 105 43339 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43350 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43357 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43391 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43395 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43397 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43425 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43445 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43455 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43475 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43280 BUSINESS PARK DR. 44051 BUSINESS PARK DR. 27449 COLT CT. 27470 COLT CT. 27470 COLT CT. 27464 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27485 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27491 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27496 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27521 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27537 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27556 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27570 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27610 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27613 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27617 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27617 COMMERCE CENTER DR.' 27621 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27625 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27629 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27633 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27629 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27637 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27641 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27645 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27653 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27657 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27661 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27669 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27653 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27633 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27645 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27665 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27669 COM/VIERCE CENTER DR. 27705 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 40750 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40761 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40880 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40925 COUNTY CENTER DR. t 40940 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40980 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40193 COUNTY CENTER DR. 26877 DIAZ RD. 27370 DIAZ RD. 27381 DIAZ RD. 27565 DIAZ RD. 27985 DIAZ RD. 27225 DIAZ RD. 27401 DIAZ RD. 27461 DIAZ RD. 27495 DIAZ RD. 27565 DIAZ RD. 27635 DIAZ RD. .-. BOX 11 { 27711 DIAZ RD. 27851 DIAZ RD. 27895 DIAZ RD. 27941 DIAZ RD. 27949 DIAZ RD. 27957 DIAZ RD. 27965 DIAZ RD. 27973 DIAZ RD.' 28046 DEL RIO RD. 28061 DIAZ RD. 28063 DIAZ RD. 28065 DIAZ RD. 28069 DIAZ RD. 28071 DIAZ RD. 28073 DIAZ RD. 28075 DIAZ RD. 28076 DIAZ RD. 28085 DIAZ RD. 28115 DIAZ RD. 27447 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27478 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27488 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27515 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 41530 S. ENTERPRISE CR. # 209 41530 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41625 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41635 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41636 N. ENTERPRISE CR. # 200 41636 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41637 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41661 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41662 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41675 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41675 S. ENTERPRISE CR.#1 41695 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41715 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41743 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41769 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41840 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41890 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 28636 FRONT ST. 27911 FRONT ST. ~, 27941 FRONT ST. 28111 FRONT ST. 28120 FRONT ST. 28636 FRONT ST. 28677 FRONT ST. 28721 FRONT ST. 28822 FRONT ST. 28822 FRONT ST. # 103 28822 FRONT ST. # 102 29065 FRONT ST. 30153 HIGHWAY 79 S. 30493 HIGHWAY 79 S. 30495 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31693 HIGHWAY 79 S. 30497 HIGHWAY 79 S. 30905 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31720 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31722 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31725 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31741 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31781 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31789 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31789 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31805 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31813 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31821 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31829 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31940 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31950 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31960 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31960 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31972 HIGHWAY 79 S. 32018 HIGHWAY 79 S. 32020 HIGHWAY 79 S. 32022 HIGHWAY 79 S. 32055 HIGHWAY 79 S. 32122 HIGHWAY 79 S. 32124 HIGHWAY 79 S. 33175 HIGHWAY 79 S. 33175 HIGHWAY 79 S. 332f5 HIGHWAY 79 S. 33291 HIGHWAY 79 S. 33295 HIGHWAY 79 S. 33320 HIGHWAY 79 S. 27220 JEFFERSON AVE. 27260 JEFFERSON AVE. " ; 27280 JEFFERSON AVE. 27300 JEFFERSON AVE. 27309 JEFFERSON AVE. 27311 JEFFERSON AVE. 27311 JEFFERSON AVE. # 101 27315 JEFFERSON AVE. SUITE G 27315 JEFFERSON AVE. SUITE F 27315 JEFFERSON AVE. SUITE K 27326 JEFFERSON AVE. 27345 JEFFERSON AVE. 27349 JEFFERSON AVE. 27355 JEFFERSON AVE. 27364 JEFFERSON AVE. 27365 JEFFERSON AVE. 27420 JEFFERSON AVE. 27443 JEFFERSON AVE. 27443 JEFFERSON AVE. 27452 JEFFERSON AVE. 27453 JEFFERSON AVE. 27464 JEFFERSON AVE. 27470 JEFFERSON AVE. 27476 JEFFERSON AVE. 27489 JEFFERSON AVE. 27491 JEFFERSON AVE. 27503 JEFFERSON AVE. 27515 JEFFERSON AVE. 27523 JEFFERSON AVE. 27529 JEFFERSON AVE. 27529 JEFFERSON AVE. 27533 JEFFERSON AVE. L~oX BOX # 12 27622 JEFFERSON AVE. 27625 JEFFERSON AVE. 27625 JEFFERSON AVE. SUITE 105 B 27635 JEFFERSON AVE. 27645 JEFFERSON AVE. 27660 JEFFERSON AVE. 27655 JEFFERSON AVE. 27690 JEFFERSON AVE. 27699 JEFFERSON AVE. 27620 JEFFERSON AVE. 27715 JEFFERSON AVE. 27717 JEFFERSON AVE. 27720 JEFFERSON AVE. 27911 JEFFERSON AVE. 27919 JEFFERSON AVE. 27941 JEFFERSON AVE. 28061 JEFFERSON AVE. 28120 JEFFERSON AVE. 28120 JEFFERSON AVE. SUITE 202 28121 JEFFERSON AVE. 28132 JEFFERSON AVE. 28134 JEFFERSON AVE. 28145 JEFFERSON AVE. 28710 LAS HACIENDAS 27135 MADISON AVE. 27250 MADISON AVE. 41852 MAIN ST. 41955 MAIN ST. 42030 MAIN ST. 42050 MAIN ST. 42031 MAIN ST. 42050 MAIN ST. 30003 MARGARITA RD. 30003 MARGARITA RD. 30007 MARGARITA RD. 30095 MARGARITA RD. 39822 MARGARITA RD. 39902 MARGARITA RD. 39952 MARGARITA RD. 40000 MARGARITA RD. 40390 MARGARITA RD. 40390 MARGARITA RD. 40440 MARGARITA RD. 40442 MARGARITA RD. 40545 MARGARITA RD. 40552 MARGARITA RD. 41520 MARGARITA RD. 42071 MARGARITA RD. 42197 MARGARITA RD. 42690 MARGARITA RD. 43049 MARGARITA RD. 43053 MARGARITA RD. 43055 MARGARITA RD. 43057 MARGARITA RD. 43059 MARGARITA RD. 43941 MARGARITA RD. 44099 MARGARITA RD. 44239 MARGARITA RD. 28314 MERCEDES ST. 28690 MERCEDES ST. 41980 MERCEDES ST. 41925 MOTOR CAR PKWY. 41852 MOTOR CAR PKWY. 41915 MOTOR CAR PKWY. 27212 NICOLAS RD. 27260 NICOLAS RD. 27270 NICOLAS RD. 27280 NICOLAS RD. 27250 NICOLAS RD. 27252 NICOLAS RD. 27321 NICOLAS RD. 27380 NICOLAS RD. 28314 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28326 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28410 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28465 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28475 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28480 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28495 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28522 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28545 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28645 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28547 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28636 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28670 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28690 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28693 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28771 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28780 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28900 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28950 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28964 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 28964 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. 30650 PAUBA RD. 31950 PAUBA RD. 31690 PIO PICO RD. 32210 PIO PICO RD. 28483 PUJOL ST. 28485 PUJOL ST. 28487 PUJOL ST. 28489 PUJOL ST. 28491 PUJOL ST. 28493 PUJOL ST. 28495 PUJOL ST. 28497 PUJOL ST. 28499 PUJOL ST. 28501 PUJOL ST. 28955 PUJOL ST. BOX # 13 i 44051 RAINBOW CANYON RD. 43040 RANCHO WY. 43193 RANCHO WY. 43244 RANCHO WY. 27454 RANCHO CA. RD. 28401 RANCHO CA. RD. 28551 RANCHO CA. RD. 28900 RANCHO CA. RD. 28903 RANCHO CA. RD. 29377 RANCHO CA. RD. 29385 RANCHO CA. RD. 29485 RANCHO CA. RD. 29530 RANCHO CA. RD. 29588 RANCHO CA. RD. 29640 RANCHO CA. RD. 29720 RANCHO CA. RD. 29720 RANCHO CA. RD. 29740 RANCHO CA. RD. 29740 RANCHO CA. RD. 29750 RANCHO CA. RD. 29760 RANCHO CA. RD. 29762 RANCHO CA. RD. 29764 RANCHO CA. RD. 29900 RANCHO CA. RD. 29910 RANCHO CA. RD. 30000 RANCHO CA. RD. 30000 RANCHO CA. RD. BDG. 79 30000 RANCHO CA. RD. # 80 30000 RANCHO CA. RD. # 81 29930 RANCHO CA. RD. 30050 RANCHO CA. RD. 30060 RANCHO CA. RD. 30070 RANCHO CA. RD. 30080 RANCHO CA. RD. 30090 RANCHO CA. RD. 30100 RANCHO CA. RD. 30520 RANCHO CA. RD. 30522 RANCHO CA. RD. 30530 RANCHO CA. RD. 30534 RANCHO CA. RD. 30570 RANCHO CA. RD. 30590 RANCHO CA. RD. 30640 RANCHO CA. RD. 30680 RANCHO CA. RD. ) 31008 RANCHO CA. RD. 28915 RANCHO CA. RD. ~'[~-:~Of~ 4a3'2'OO'REMINGTON AVE. 27413 REMINGTON AVE. 41906 REMINGTON AVE. 41906 REMINGTON AVE. 42375 REMINGTON AVE. 43460 RIDGE PARK DR. 43460 RIDGE PARK DR. # 100 43460 RIDGE PARK DR. # 170 43460 RIDGE PARK DR. # 270 43460 RIDGE PARK DR. #255 43460 RIDGE PARK DR. # 140 43500 RIDGE PARK DR. 42122 RIO NEDO # 107 42346 RIO NEDO 42355 RIO NEDO 42380 RIO NEDO 42396 RIO NEDO 42480 RIO NEDO 42480 RIO NEDO 42487 RIO NEDO 42540 RIO NEDO 42555 RIO NEDO 42583 RIO NEDO 42587 RIO NEDO 42600 RIO NEDO 42640 RIO NEDO 42657 RIO NEDO 28820 SINGLE OAK DR. 43094 VIA DOS PICOS SUITE C 43094 VIA DOS PICOS # D 28720 VIA MONTEZUMA 28730 VIA MONTEZUMA 28733 VIA MONTEZUMA 28381 VIA MONTEZUMA\ 27098 WINCHESTER RD. 40140 WINCHESTER RD. · . 40150 WINCHESTER RD. 40174 WINCHESTER RD. '. · 40285 WINCHESTER RD. 40287 WINCHESTER RD. · 40355 WINCHESTER RD. 40385 WINCHESTER RD.' ' 40387 WINCHESTER RD. 40390 WINCHESTER RD. & 40404 WINCI-IESTER RD. 40456 WINCI-iESTER RD. 40405 WINCHESTER RD. BOX # 14 40405 WINCHESTER RD. 40405 WINCHESTER RD. S-4 40405 WINCHESTER RD. S-3 40407 WINCHESTER RD. PAD A 40435 WINCHESTER RD. 40454 WINCHESTER RD. 40458 WINCHESTER RD. 40460 WINCHESTER RD. 40464 WINCHESTER RD. 40496 WINCHESTER RD. 40642 WINCHESTER RD. 40665 WINCHESTER RD. B-3 40665 WINCHESTER RD. # 7 40686 WINCHESTER RD. PAD C 40695 WINCHESTER RD. # 3 40695 WINCHESTER RD. #2 40705 WINCHESTER RD. 40705 WINCHESTER RD. A-8 40708 WINCHESTER RD. 40784 WINCHESTER RD. 40820 WINCHESTER RD. 40885 WINCHESTER RD. 40885 WINCHESTER RD. 40900 WINCHESTER RD. 40902 WINCHESTER RD. 40971 WINCHESTER RD. 40998 WINCHESTER RD. 41555 WINCHESTER RD. 41615 WINCHESTER RD. 41638 WINCHESTER RD. 41707 WINCHESTER RD. 41735 WINCHESTER RD. 42092 WINCHESTER RD. 42187 WINCHESTER RD. 42188 WINCHESTER RD. 42265 WINCHESTER RD. 42265 WINCHESTER RD. 42389 WINCHESTER RD. 42387 WINCHESTER RD. 42400 WINCHESTER RD. 42410 WINCHESTER RD. 42420 WINCHESTER RD. 42440 WINCHESTER RD. 40150 WINCHESTER RD. 40275 WINCHESTER RD. 40325 WINCHESTER RD. 40355 WINCHESTER RD. 40367 WINCHESTER RD. 40385 WINCHESTER RD. 40390 WINCHESTER RD. 40405 WINCHESTER RD. 40406 WINCHESTER RD. 40408 WINCHESTER RD. 40414 WINCHESTER RD. 40420 WINCHESTER RD. 40426 WINCHESTER RD. 40432 WINCHESTER RD. 40438 WINCHESTER RD. 40444 WINCHESTER RD. 40450 WINCHESTER RD. 40452 WINCHESTER RD. 40456 WINCHESTER RD. 40458 WINCHESTER RD. 40462 WINCHESTER RD. 40464 WINCHESTER RD. 40466 WINCHESTER RD. 40468 WINCHESTER RD. ~-0470 WINCHESTER RD.' 40474 WINCHESTER RD. 40480 WINCHESTER RD. 40486 WINCHESTER RD. 40520 WINCHESTER RD. 40570 WINCHESTER RD. 46620 WINCHESTER RD. 40620 WINCHESTER RD. PAD C 40680 WINCHESTER RD. 40710 WINCHESTER RD. 40665 WINCHESTER RD. 40688 WINCHESTER RD. 40688 WINCHESTER RD. PAD D 410688 WINCHESTER RD.SUITE A 40688 WINCHESTER RD. # C 40705 WINCHESTER RD. A-1 40705 WINCHESTER RD. a-2 40705 WINCHESTER RD. A-5 40705 WINCHESTER RD. A-6 40750 WINCHESTER RD. 40752 WINCHESTER RD. 40705 WINCHESTER RD. #104 40720 WINCHESTER RD. 40788 WINCHESTER RD. # C 40788 WINCHESTER RD. LOT G { 40810 WINCHESTER RD. #A 40812 WINCHESTER RD. PAD H 40820 WINCHESTER RD. 40820 WINCHESTER RD. K-1 40820 WINCHESTER RD. K-10 40820 WINCHESTER RD. FC-1 -. 40820 WINCHESTER RD. FC-2 40820 WINCHESTER RD. FC-4 40820 WINCHESTER RD. FC-5 40820 WINCHESTER RD. FC-6 40820 WINCHESTER RD. FC-7 40820 WINCHESTER RD. FC-8 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1010 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1020 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1040 40820 WINCHESTER RD. # 1050 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1120 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1100 BOX # 15 41065 1sT ST. 41905 2r'~ ST. 41923 2tqr) ST. 41950 2N° ST. 41952 2~rv ST 41915 3P'I) ST. 41925 3R° ST. 41934 3RD ST. 41956 3Rr~ ST. 41965 3RD ST. 41841 4TM ST. 41850 4TM ST. 41915 4TM ST. 41935 4TM ST. 41975 4TM ST. 42096 4TM ST. 41843 5TM ST. 41868 5TM ST. 41876 5TM ST. 41890 5TM ST. 41955 5TM ST. 41964 5TM ST. 41805 5TM ST. 41818 6TM ST. 41835 6TM ST. 41910 6TM ST. 41920 6TM ST. 41944 6TM ST. 41952 6TM ST. 41952 6TM ST. 41955 6TM ST. 41973 6TM ST. 41975 4TM ST. 42146 6TM ST. 42220 6TM ST. 42251 6TM ST. 41976 AVENIDA ALVARADO 41981 AVENIDA ALVARADO 41992 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42011 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42024 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42030 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42041 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42066 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42136 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42143 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42257 AVENEDA ALVARADO 42198 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42257 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42295 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42322 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42345 AVENff)A ALVARADO 42353 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42353 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42363 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42371 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42373 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42374-B AVENIDA ALVARADO 42387 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42445 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42497 AVENIDA ALVARADO 42506 AVENIDA ALVARADO 44535 BEDFORD CT. 43095 BLACKDEER LOOP 43135 BLACKDEER LOOP 27458 BOSTIK CT. 27460 BOSTIK CT. 41915 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43035 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43040 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43044 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43045 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43071 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43085 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43089 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43105 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43123 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43137 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43153 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43171 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43172 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43174 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43176 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43178 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43180 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43189 BUSINESS PARK DR. ,. · 43195 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43200 BUSINESS PARK DR. / 43205 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43218 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43223 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43225 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43234 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43250 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43264 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43280 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43280 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43280 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43280 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43300 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43339 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43350 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43352 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43357 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43375 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43397 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43415 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43425 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43445 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43455 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43475 BUSINESS PARK DR. 43497 BUSINESS PARK DR. 27447 COLT DR. 27480 COLT DR. 27464 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27470 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27475 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27485 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27495 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27496 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27499 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27511 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27516 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27521 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27532 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27537 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27555 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27556 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27561 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27562 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27570 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27570 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27574 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27576 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27577 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27584 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27585 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27590 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27591 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27598 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27599 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27610 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27620 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27630 COMMERCE CENTER DR. 27860 DEL RIO RD. 27886 DEL RIO RD. 28030 DEL RIO RD. 28061 DEL RIO RD. 28115 DEL RIO RD. 31139 DEL RIO RD. 27640 DEL RIO RD. 27667 DEL RIO RD. 27685 DEL RIO RD. 27690 DEL RIO RD. 27705 DEL RIO RD. 31618 DEL RIO RD. 40610 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40761 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40880 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40925 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40935 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40937 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40945 COUNTY CENTER DR. 40997 COUNTY CENTER DR. 41000 COUNTY CENTER DR. 41093 COUNTY CENTER DR. ~0~ (S' i ?. 'zo BOX # 16 41530 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41581 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41593 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41607 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41609 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41625 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41661 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41662 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41669 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41680 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41689 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41689 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41690 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41710 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41715 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41740 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41743 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41769 N. ENTERPRISE CR. 41785 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41797 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41800 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41840 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41860 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41892 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 41710 S. ENTERPRISE CR. 27412 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27415 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27430 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27431 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27462 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27463 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27478 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27479 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27479 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27488 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27495 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27498 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27512 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27515 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27520 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 27535 W. ENTERPRISE CR. 31320 FELECITA RD. 28374 FELIX VALDEZ AVE. 28377 FELIX VALDEZ AVE 28403 FELIX VAI.DEZ AVE 28404 FELIX VALDEZ AVE 28418 FELIX VALDEZ AVE 28432 FELIX VALDEZ AVE 28441 FELIX VALDEZ AVE 28450 FELIX VALDEZ AVE 28464 FELIX VALDEZ AVE 28465 FELIX VALDEZ AVE 24596 FUERTA 43910 FLORES DR. 43919 FLORES DR. 43930 FLORES DR. 43975 FLORES DR. 44121 FLORES DR. 27740 FRONT ST. 27770 FRONT ST. 27780 FRONT ST.' 27901 FRONT ST. 27911 FRONT ST. 27919 FRONT ST. 27941 FRONT ST. 27969 FRONT ST. 27999 FRONT ST. 28007 FRONT ST. 28011 FRONT ST. 28036 FRONT ST. 28061 FRONT ST. 28075 FRONT ST. 28093 FRONT ST. 28100 FRONT ST. 28110 FRONT ST. 28111 FRONT ST. 28120 FRONT ST. 28121 FRONT ST. 28125 FRONT ST. 28127 FRONT ST. 28129 FRONT ST. 28130 FRONT ST. 28131 FRONT ST. 28145 FRONT ST. 28165 FRONT ST. 28250 FRONT ST. 28266 FRONT ST. 28274 FRONT ST. 28282 FRONT ST. 28286 FRONT ST. 28290 FRONT ST. 28298 FRONT ST. 28322 FRONT ST. 28360 FRONT ST. 28370 FRONT ST. 28410 FRONT ST. 28~,~.~. FRONT ST. 28455 FRONT ST. 28464 FRONT ST. 28465 FRONT ST. 28475 FRONT ST. 28480 FRONT ST. 28495 FRONT ST. 28500 FRONT ST. 28522 FRONT ST. 28535 FRONT ST. 28544 FRONT ST. 28545 FRONT ST. 28551 FRONT ST. 28581 FRONT ST. BOX # 17 31087 NICOLAS RD. 27229 NICOLAS RD 27248 NICOLAS RD. 39120 PALA VISTA RD. 39130 PALA VISTA RD, 33010 PATERNO ST. 30470 PAUBA RD. 30650 PAUBA RD. 31051 PAUBA RD. 31089 PAUBA RD. 31125 PAUBA RD. 31141 PAUBA RD. 31547 PAUBA RD. 31950 PAUBA RD. 31950 PAUBA RD. #1030 32126 PAUBA RD. LOT 46 32159 PAUBA RD. 33840 PAUBA RD. 33905 PAUBA RD. 28501 PUJOL ST. 28735 PUJOL ST. 42200 MAIN ST. 43084 RANCHO WY. 43124 RANCHO WY. 43136 RANCHO WY. 43244 RANCHO WY. 27536 RANCHO CA. RD. 28275 RANCHO CA. RD. 28401 RANCHO CA. RD. 28419 RANCHO CA. RD. 28441 RANCHO CA. RD. 28481 RANCHO CA. RD. 28764 RANCHO CA. RD. 28775 RANCHO CA. RD. 28865 RANCHO CA. RD. 28897 RANCHO CA. RD. 28900 RANCHO CA. RD. 28903 RANCHO CA. RD. 28910 RANCHO CA. RD. 28915 RANCHO CA. RD. 29345 RANCHO CA. RD. 29363 RANCHO CA. RD. 29370 RANCHO CA. RD. 29373 RANCHO CA. RD. 29375 RANCHO CA. RD. 29379 RANCHO CA. RD. 29385 RANCHO CA. RD. 29400 RANCHO CA. RD. 29405 RANCHO CA. RD. 29418 RANCHO CA. RD. 29428 RANCHO CA. RD. 29450 RANCHO CA. RD. 29500 RANCHO CA. RD. 29530 RANCHO CA. RD. 29560 RANCHO CA. RD. 29588 RANCHO CA. RD. 29610 RANCHO CA. RD. 29636 RANCHO CA. RD. 29640 RANCHO CA. RD. 29645 RANCHO CA. RD. 29676 RANCHO CA. RD. 30000 RANCHO CA. RD. 29700 RANCHO CA. RD. 29720 RANCHO CA. RD. 29738 RANCHO CA. RD. 29740 RANCHO CA. RD. 29750 RANCHO CA. RD. 29758 RANCHO CA. RD. 29760 RANCHO CA. RD. 29762 RANCHO CA. RD. 29764 RANCHO CA. RD. 29766 RANCHO CA. RD. 29780 RANCHO CA. RD. 29800 RANCHO CA. RD. 29815 RANCHO CA. RD. 29855 RANCHO CA. RD. 29940 RANCHO CA. RD. 29950 RANCHO CA. RD. 29960 RANCHO CA. RD. 29970 RANCHO CA. RD. 29980 RANCHO CA. RD. 29990 RANCHO CA. RD. 30000 RANCHO CA. RD. 30042 RANCHO CA. RD. 30100 RANCHO CA. RD. 30010 RANCHO CA. RD. 30020 RANCHO CA. RD. 30040 RANCHO CA. RD. 30030 RANCHO CA. RD. 30100 RANCHO CA. RD. 30101 RANCHO CA. RD. 30104 RANCHO CA. RD. 30233 RANCHO CA. RD. 30240 RANCHO CA. RD. 30252 RANCHO CA. RD. 30258 RANCHO CA. RD. 30496 RANCHO CA. RD. 30510 RANCHO CA. RD. 30520 RANCHO CA. RD. 30520 RANCHO CA. RD. 30530 RANCHO CA. RD. 30534 RANCHO CA. RD. 30540 RANCHO CA. RD. 30550 RANCHO CA. RD. 30570 RANCHO CA. RD. 30580 RANCHO CA. RD. 30590 RANCHO CA. RD. BOX # 18 30610 RANCHO CA. RD. BLDG. 1 30630 RANCHO CA. RD. 30640 RANCHO CA. RD. 30650 RANCHO CA. RD. 30660 RANCHO CA. RD. 30680 RANCHO CA. RD. 30682 RANCHO CA. RD. 30684 RANCHO CA. RD. 30690 RANCHO CA. RD. 30696 RANCHO CA. RD. 30710 RANCHO CA. RD. 30900 RANCHO CA. RD. 28903 RANCHO CA. RD. 31000 RANCHO CA. RD. 31200 RANCHO CA. RD. 31346 RANCHO CA. RD. 31872 RANCHO CA. RD. 31975 RANCHO CA. RD. 32000 RANCHO CA. RD. 32036 RANCHO CA. RD. 36195 RANCHO CA. RD. 42200 RANCHO CA. RD. 42208 RANCHO CA. RD. 42238 RANCHO CA. RD. 30875 RANCHO VISTA 31350 RANCHO VISTA 41908 REMINGTON AVE. 42306 REMINGTON AVE. 41735 RIDER WY. 41745 RIDER WY. 41750 RIDER WY. 41755 RIDER WY. 41760 RIDER WY. 41765 RIDER WY. 43500 RIDGE PARK DR. 41979 RIO NEDO 42033 RIO NEDO 42088 RIO NEDO 42122 RIO NEDO 42166 RIO NEDO 42188 RIO NEDO 42217 RIO NEDO 42122 RIO NEDO 42232 RIO NEDO 42274 RIO NEDO 42327 RIO NEDO 42346 RIO NEDO 42348 RIO NEDO 42355 RIO NEDO 42368 RIO NEDO 42380 RIO NEDO 42381 RIO NEDO 42505 RIO NEDO 42520 RIO NEDO 42580 RIO NEDO 42585 RIO NEDO 42620 RIO NEDO 42625 RIO NEDO 42640 RIO NEDO 42660 RIO NEDO 42662 RIO NEDO 42685 RIO NEDO 42690 RIO NEDO 42715 RIO NEDO 42979 RIO NEDO 39541 SARAH DR. 29542 SARAH DR. 39547 SARAH DR. 39548 SARAH DR. 39553 SARAH DR. 39554 SARAH DR. 39577 SARAH DR. 39578 SARAH DR. 42136 SARAH DR. 42246 SARAH DR. 42148 SARAH DR. 42158 SARAH DR. 42169 SARAH DR. 42170 SARAH DR. 42179 SARAH DR. 42179 SARAH DR. 42180 SARAH DR. 42191 SARAH DR. 42192 SARAH DR. 42201 SARAH DR. 42202 SARAH DR. 42204 SARAH DR. 42213 SARAH DR. 42214 SARAH DR. 42223 SARAH DR. I o4v'2- 42224 SARAH DR. 42235 SARAH DR. 42236 SARAH DR. 42245 SARAH DR. 29775 SANTIAGO RD. 29851 SANTIAGO RD. 29962 SANTIAGO RD. 30026 SANTIAGO RD. 30600 SANTIAGO RD. 28765 SANTIAGO RD. 28780 SANTIAGO RD. 28835 SANTIAGO RD. 28835 SANTIAGO RD. 28865 SINGLE OAK DR. 31640 VIA CORDOBA 43062 VIA LOS PICOS 43094 VIA LOS PICOS 43122 VIA LOS PICOS 43154 VIA LOS PICOS 43169 VIA LOS PICOS 43186 VIA LOS PICOS 43216 VIA LOS PICOS 43169 VIA LOS PICOS 29753 VIA LAS CHACRAS 28696 VIA MONTEZUMA 28715 VIA MONTEZUMA 28730 VIA MONTEZUMA 28733 VIA MONTEZUMA 28753 VIA MONTEZUMA 28362 VINCENET MORAGA 28381 VINCENT MORAGA 28395 VINCENT MORAGA 28410 VINCENT MORAGA 40140 WINCHESTER 40142 WINCHESTER RD. 40190 WINCHESTER RD. 40212 WINCHESTER RD. 40263 WINCHESTER RD. 40301 WINCHESTER RD. 40335 WINCHESTER RD. 40345 WINCHESTER RD. 40353 WINCHESTER RD. 40355 WINCHESTER RD. 40355 WINCHESTER RD. 40375 WINCHESTER RD. 40392 WINCHESTER RD. BOX # 19 40820 WINCHESTER RD. # 1110 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1130 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1140 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1150 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1160 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1170 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1200 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1210 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1220 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1240 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1250 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1255 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #t300 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1310 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1330 &1340 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1360 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1370 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1380 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1400 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1410 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1420 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1430 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1440 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1460 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1500 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1510 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1520 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1530 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1540 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1550 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1560 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #t600 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1610 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1620 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1630 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1450 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1650 40820 WIN( ~HESTER RD. #1660 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #1750 40820 WIN( ',HESTER RD. #2100 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2200 40820 WIN( ',HESTER RD. #2110 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2120 40820 WIN( ',HESTER RD. #2130 t 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2140 40820 WIN( ~HESTER RD. #2150 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2160 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2165 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2170 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2200 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2270 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2360 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2370 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2390 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2400 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2410 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2420 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2430 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2440 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2450 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2460 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2470 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2460 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2500 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2500 · 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2510 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2510 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2540 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2530 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2205 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2210 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2220 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2225 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2230 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2240 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2250 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2253 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2255 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2260 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2280 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2282 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2285 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2290 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2292 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2297 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2300 · , :' ' 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2310 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2320 ~ 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2330 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2353 40820 WINCHESTER RD. #2350 40820 WINCHESTER RD. # J 41868 WINCHESTER RD. 40963 WINCHESTER RD. 41125 WINCHESTER RD. 41555 WINCHESTER RD. 41593 WINCHESTER RD. 41630 WINCHESTER RD. 41669 WINCHESTER RD. 41750 WINCHESTER RD. 41790 WINCHESTER RD. 42420 WINCHESTER RD. 42715 WINCHESTER RD. 0, BOX # 20 ~, ~ 40402 WINCHESTER RD. 40404 WINCHESTER RD. 40414 WINCHESTER RD. 40435 WINCHESTER RD. 40465 WINCI-I'ESTER RD. 40495 WINCHESTER RD. 40505 WINCHESTER RD. 40511 WINCHESTER RD. 40515 WlNCI-I~STER RD. 40525 WINCHESTER RD. 40575 WINCHESTER RD. 40585 WINCHESTER RD. 40605 WINCHESTER RD. 40635 WINCHESTER RD. 40665 WINCHESTER RD. 40665 WINCHESTER RD. B-8 40665 WINCHESTER RD. B-7 40667 WINCHESTER RD. 40695 WINCHESTER RD. 40700 WINCHESTER RD. 40705 WINCHESTER RD. 40767 WINCHESTER RD. 40800 WINCHESTER RD. 40805 WINCHESTER RD. 40825 WINCHESTER RD. 40885 WINCHESTER RD. 40915 WINCHESTER RD. 40917 WINCHESTER RD. 40941 WINCHESTER RD. 40945 WINCHESTER RD. 40949 WINCHESTER RD. 40963 WINCHESTER RD. 40967 WINCHESTER RD. 40971 WINCHESTER RD. 40975 WINCHESTER RD. 41005 WINCHESTER RD. 41125 WINCHESTER RD. 41195 WINCHESTER RD. 41540 WINCHESTER RD. 41555 WINCHESTER RD. 41593 WINCHESTER RD. 41611 WINCHESTER RD. 41615 WINCHESTER RD. 41630 WINCHESTER RD. ' 41669 WINCHESTER RD. 41670 WINCHESTER RD. 41699 WINCHESTER RD. 41700 WINCHESTER RD. 41707 WINCHESTER RD. 41715 WINCHESTER RD. 41735 WINCHESTER RD. 41750 WINCHESTER RD. 41773 WINCHESTER RD. 41790 WINCHESTER RD. 41975 WINCHESTER RD. 41980 WINCHESTER RD. 42063 WINCHESTER RD. 42092 WINCHESTER RD. '42116 WINCHESTER RD. 42130 WINCHESTER RD. 42135 WINCHESTER RD. 42139 WINCHESTER RD. 42267 WINCHESTER RD. 42291 WINCHESTER RD. 42297 WINCHESTER RD. 42299 WINCHESTER RD. 42310 WINCHESTER RD. 42315 WINCHESTER RD. 42400 WINCHESTER RD. 42410 WINCHESTER RD. 42430 WINCHESTER RD. 42440 WINCHESTER RD. 42442 WINCHESTER RD. 45540 WINCHESTER RD. 26706 YNEZ CT. 26720 YNEZ CT. 26750 YNEZ CT. 26772 YNEZ CT. 26780 YNEZ CT. 26810 YNEZ CT. 26201 YNEZ RD. 26810 YNEZ RD. 26040 YNEZ RD. 26090 YNEZ RD. ~", 26109 YNEZ RD. 26111 YNEZ RD. ':" ' 26201 YNEZ RD. 26246 YNEZ RD. ~ 26401 YNEZ RD. 26403 YNEZ RD. 26407 YNEZ RD. 26411 YNEZ RD. 26415 YNEZ RD. 26419 YNEZ RD. 26422 YNEZ RD. 26423 YNEZ RD. 26427 YNEZ RD. 26431 YNEZ RD. 26435 YNEZ RD. 26439 YNEZ RD. 26443 YNEZ RD. 26447 YNEZ RD. 26451 YNEZ RD. 26453 YNEZ RD. 26455 YNEZ RD. 26459 YNEZ RD. 26463 YNEZ RD. 26469 YNEZ RD. 26471 YNEZ RD. 26475 YNEZ RD. 26479 YNEZ RD. 26483 YNEZ RD. 26485 YNEZ RD. 26487 YNEZ RD. 26489 YNEZ RD. 26491 YNEZ RD. 26493 YNEZ RD. 26495 YNEZ RD. 26527 YNEZ RD. 26531 YNEZ RD. 26631 YNEZ RD. 26632 YNEZ RD. 26645 YNEZ RD. 26677 YNEZ RD. BOX # 21 26668 YNEZ RD. #B 26671 YNEZ RD. 26672 YNEZ RD. 26673 YNEZ RD. #C 26677 YNEZ RD. 26680 YNEZ RD. 26700 YNEZ RD. 26755 YNEZ RD. 26770 YNEZ RD. 26799 YNEZ RD. 26808 YNEZ RD. 26845 YNEZ RD. 26847 YNEZ RD. #H 26875 YNEZ RD. 26891 YNEZ RD. 26895 YNEZ RD. 27352 YNEZ RD. 27393 YNEZ RD.STE. 151 27401 YNEZ RD. 27403 YiNEZ RD. 27405 YNEZ RD. 27418 YNEZ RD. 27422 YNEZ RD. 27423 YNEZ RD. 27425 YNEZ RD. 27438 YNEZ RD. 27450 YNEZ RD. 27450 YNEZ RD. #306 27450 YNEZ RD.# 206 27450 YNEZ RD. # 300 27450 YNEZ RD. # 104 27450 YNEZ RD.# 106 27450 YNEZ RD.# 110 27450 YNEZ RD.#120 27450 YNEZ RD.#122 27450 YNEZ RD.# 124 27450 YNEZ RD. #128 27450 YNEZ RD.# 203 27450 YNEZ RD.# 212 27450 YNEZ RD.# 228 27450 YNEZ RD.# 203 27450 YNEZ RD.# 214 27450 YNEZ RD.# 222 27450 YNEZ RD.# 226 27450 YNEZ RD.# 300 27450 YNEZ RD.# 300 27450 YNEZ RD.# 316 27450 YNEZ RD.# 318 27450 YNEZ RD.# 100 27451 YNEZ RD. 27453 YNEZ RD. 27453 YNEZ RD. 27454 YNEZ RD. 27467 YNEZ RD. #2F 27468 YNEZ RD.# B-13 27468 YNEZ RD.# 27468 YNEZ RD.# B-3 27468 YNEZ RD.# B-7 27468 YNEZ RD.# A-7 27468 YNEZ RD.# 27468 YNEZ RD.# B-1 27468 YNEZ RD.# B-11 27468 YNEZ RD.#D-9 27468 YNEZ RD. #B-17 27469 YNEZ RD. 27471 YNEZ RD. 27473 YNEZ RD. 27475 YNEZ RD. 27476 YNEZ RD. 27477 YNEZ RD. 27479 YNEZ RD. 27479 YNEZ RD. 27480 YNEZ RD. 27481 YNEZ RD. 27483 YNEZ RD. 27485 YNEZ RD. 27488 YNEZ RD. 27489 YNEZ RD. 27491 YNEZ RD. 27493 YNEZ RD. 27495 YNEZ RD. 27497 YNEZ RD. 27499 YiNEZ RD. 27501 YNEZ RD. 27503 YNEZ RD.#A-7 27505 YNEZ RD.#A 27507 YNEZ RD.# A 27509 YNEZ RD.#D-3 27510 YNEZ RD. 27511 YNEZ RD. 27513 YNEZ RD.#B 27515 YNEZ RD.#B-3 27517 YNEZ RD. 27519 YNEZ RD. 27520 YNEZ RD. C-1 27521 YNEZ RD. B-6 27523 YNEZ RD.# C 27525 YNEZ RD. 27527 YNEZ RD. 27529 YNEZ RD. 27531 YNEZ RD. 27535 YNEZ RD. 27536 YNEZ RD. 27537 YNEZ RD. 27540 YNEZ RD. 27541 YNEZ RD. 27544 YNEZ RD. 27546 YNEZ RD. 27548 YNEZ RD. 27555 YNEZ RD. 27560 YNEZ RD. 27576 YNEZ RD. 27580 YNEZ RD. 27576 YNEZ RD. 27585 YNEZ RD. 27589 YNEZ RD. 27610 YNEZ RD. 27630 YNEZ RD. 27636 YNEZ RD. 27644 YNEZ RD. 27691 YNEZ RD. 28921 YNEZ RD. 28250 YNEZ RD. 29445 YNEZ RD. 29521 YNEZ RD. 30088 YNEZ RD. 41358 YNEZ RD. 42301 ZEVO DR. 42380 ZEVO DR. 42382 ZEVO DR. 41514 ZINFANDEL AVE. BOX# 22 27420 YNEZ RD. 27423 YNEZ RD. 27425 YNEZ RD. 27430 YNEZ RD. 27450 YNEZ RD. 27450 YNEZ RD.# 200 27469 COLT CT. 27477 YNEZ RD. BLDG. H 27487 YNEZ RD. 27489 YNEZ RD. 27497 YNEZ RD. 27517 YNEZ RD. 27517 YNEZ RD. # B~6 27520 YNEZ RD. 26522 YNEZ~RD. 27523 YNEZ RD. 27536 YNEZ RD. 27540 YNEZ RD. 27541 YNEZ RD. 27548 YNEZ RD. 27555 YNEZ RD. 27555 YNEZ RD. #300 27555 YNEZ RD.# 406 27560 YNEZ RD.# H-1 27576 YNEZ RD. 26810 YNEZ CT. # B 26810 YNEZ CT.# D 26810 YNEZ CT.# E 26845 YNEZ RD. 26845 YNEZ RD. 26893 YNEZ RD. 26895 YNEZ RD. 26896 YNEZ RD. 26905 YNEZ RD. 27360 YNEZ RD. 27362 YNEZ RD. 26531 YN-EZ RD.BLDG. E 26531 YNEZ RD. BLDG.A 26558 YNEZ RD. 26580 YNEZ RD. 26580 YNEZ RD.# B 26580 YNEZ RD.# C 26580 YNEZ RD. PAD R 26582 YNEZ RD. 26604 YNEZ RD. 26610 YNEZ RD. 266612 YNEZ RD. 26677 YNEZ RD. 26700 YNEZ RD. 26770 YNEZ RD. 26780 YNEZ RD. 26780 YNEZ CT. 26799 YNEZ RD. 26780 YNEZ RD. 26810 YNEZ CT. 26431 YNEZ RD. 26431 YNEZ RD. BLDG. A 26531 .YNEZ RD. BLDG. E 26531 YNEZ RD. BLDG. B 26447 YNEZ RD. 26453 YNEZ RD. 26455 YNEZ RD. 26459 YNEZ RD.# B 26460 YNEZ RD. 26462 YNEZ RD. 26469 YNEZ RD. 26475 YNEZ RD. 26480 YNEZ RD. 26482 YNEZ RD. 26485 YNEZ RD. 26487 YNEZ RD. 26489 YNEZ RD. 26491 YNEZ RD. 26531 YNEZ RD. 26109 YNEZ RD. 26040 YNEZ RD. 26090 YNEZ RD. 26109 YNEZ RD. 26111 YNEZ RD. 26411 YNEZ RD. 26419 YNEZ RD. 26420 YNEZ RD. 26440 YNEZ RD. 26440 YNEZRD.PAD O 27630 YNEZ RD. 27632 YNEZ RD. 27634 YNEZ RD. 27636 YNEZ RD. 27640 YNEZ RD. 27641 YNEZ RD. 27642 YNEZ RD. 27644 YNEZ RD. 27645 YNEZ RD. 27648 YNEZ RD. 27649 YNEZRD. 27658 YNEZ RD. 27684 YNEZ RD. 27691 YNEZ RD. 27735 YNEZ RD. 28231 YNEZ RD. 28250 YNEZ RD. 28921 YNEZ RD. 28960 YNEZ RD. 29083 YNEZ RD. 29111 YNEZ RD. 29180 YN-EZ RD. 29201 YNEZ RD. 29232 YNEZ RD. 29280 YNEZ RD. 29320 YNEZ RD. 29345 YNEZ RD. 29370 YNEZ RD. 29420 YNEZ RD. 29501 YNEZ RD. 29521 YN-EZ RD. 29528 YNEZ RD. 29999 YNEZ RD. 30000 YNEZ RD. 30075 YNEZ RD. 30195 YNEZ RD. 30220 YNEZ RD. 30225 YNEZ RD. 30235 YNEZ RD. 30260 YNEZ RD. 42340 YNEZ RD. 30655 YUKON RD. 30661 YUKON RD. 30915 YUKON RD. 42000 ZEVO DR. 42180 ZEVO DR. 42182 ZEVO DR. 42230 ZEVO DR. 42301 ZEVO DR. 42303 ZEVO DR. BOX# 23 28601 FRONT ST. 28635 FRONT ST. 28636 FRONT ST. 28645 FRONT ST. 28656 FRONT ST. 28657 FRONT ST. 28676 FRONT ST. 28677 FRONT ST. 28690 FRONT ST. #300 28690 FRONT ST. #370 28690 FRONT ST. #400 28690 FRONT ST. #440 28693 FRONT ST. 28718 FRONT ST. 28721 FRONT ST. 28780 FRONT ST. 28781 FRONT ST. 28800 FRONT ST. 28822 FRONT ST. 28825 FRONT ST. 28860 FRONT ST. 28897 FRONT ST. 28900 FRONT ST. 28924 FRONT ST. 28936 FRONT ST. 28950 FRONT ST. 28970 FRONT ST. 28980 FRONT ST. 28999 FRONT ST. 29000 FRONT ST. 29065 FRONT ST. 29095 FRONT ST. 29105 FRONT ST. 29107 FRONT ST. 29115 FRONT ST. 29125 FRONT ST. 29217 FRONT ST. 29635 FRONT ST. #B 29663 FRONT ST. 30025 FRONT ST. 30027 FRONT ST. 42050 FRONT ST. #D 29150 HIGHWAY 79 S. 30909 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31300 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31589 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31669 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31677 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31685 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31693 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31797 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31797 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31805 HIGHWAY 79 S. #D 31805 HIGHWAY 79 S. #D-1 31805 HIGHWAY 79 S. #D-3 31805 HIGHWAY 79 S. #D-5 31805 HIGHWAY 79 S. #D-7 31805 HIGHWAY 79 S. #D-9 31813 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31821 HIGHWAY 79 S. #C-5 31821 HIGHWAY 79 S. # C-9 31821 HIGHWAY 79 S. # C 31821 HIGHWAY 79 S. # C-1 31821 HIGHWAY 79 S. 8C-3 31821 HIGHWAY 79 S. #C-7 31829 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31829 HIGHWAY 79 S. #B-1 31829 HIGHWAY 79 S. #B-3 31829 HIGHWAY 79 S. #B-5 31837 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31837 HIGHWAY 79 S. #A-3 31845 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31853 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31940 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31940 HIGHWAY 79 S. #C-2 31940 HIGHWAY 79 S. #C-3 31950 HIGHWAY 79 S. #B-1 31950 HIGHWAY 79 S. #B-4 31950 HIGHWAY 79 S. #B-5 31950 HIGHWAY 79 S. #B-6 31950 HIGHWAY 79 S. #B-9 31960 HIGHWAY 79 S. 31970 HIGHWAY 79 S. 33320 HIGHWAY 79 S. ~, to.Fi ITEM 6 A P P R O V ~,,,~.,,/,,,~...~._. CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~¢I~ ~r-,..~. ClTYM, NAGER ' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council ~- FROM: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Managed/t,~ DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Second Amendment To Professional Services Agreement Between City of Temecula and Kelley Display, Inc. - City Banner Program Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment in the amount of $1,557.00 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kelley Display, Inc. for the not to exceed amount of $52,057.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment. BACKGROUND: On March 6, 2001, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Kelley Display, Inc. for $33,000.00. This firm is responsible for manufacturing as well as the storage, cleaning and shipping of the City banners that are located on Rancho California and Winchester Roads. On October 23, 2001, the City Council approved the Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Kelley Display, Inc. for the not to exceed amount of $50,500.00. This included event banners with new date changes, the new Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure banners, and fill-in banners. The current contract needs to be amended to cover the costs of manufacturing new American flag banners to be displayed along Rancho California and Winchester Roads. The flag banners are being replaced due to old age and they have been displayed throughout the year since shortly after September 11. Except for the increase amount of the contract, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for this agreement in the FY 2001-02 Economic Development Department Operating Budget, Banner Program. ATTACHMENTS: Second Amendment to Professional Services Agreement Between City of Temecula and Kelley Display, inc. - City Banner Program R:\Wolnickg~genda report s~an n e r Amendment *02 doc AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BE'I'WEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND KELLEY DISPLAY, INC. - CITY BANNER PROGRAM THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of, May 21, 2002 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Kelley Display, Inc. ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On, March 6, 2001 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Banner Purchase/Storage/Cleaning/Shipping Services ("Agreement"). B. The Agreement was amended on October 23, 2001. The Agreement as amended shall be referred to as the "Agreement C. The parties now desire to increase the payment for services in the amount of $1,557.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 3 Purchase/Storacle/Cleanina/ShiDDina Price. of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, for the Purchase, storage, Cleaning and Shipping price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the banners shall not exceed One Thousand Five Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars ($1,557.00). The total amount of this agreement is increased to $52,057.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. - 1 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CiTY OF TEMECULA BY: Ron Robe,s, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Susan W, Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney VENDOR BY: Kelley Display, Inc. NAME: TITLE: BY: NAME: TITLE: (Two Signatures Required For Corporations) 2 ITEM 7 APPROV~.. C TY^TTORNEV DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~,~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Extending the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE SERVICE FEE COLLECTED ON BEHALF OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY UNTIL MAY 2014 BACKGROUND: In 1990, the California State Legislature enacted legislation allowing for the creation of county-based vehicle service authority, pursuant to the provisions of Section 22710 of the Vehicle Code. In June 1994, the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority was formed and imposed a one-dollar annual vehicle registration fee on vehicles registered to an owner with an address in the County of Riverside. Vehicle registration fees are collected by the Department of Motor VehiCles and allocated to Riverside Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority by the State Controller pursuant to Section 9250.7 of the Vehicle Cede. Fees are then allocated to 24 participating Cities within Riverside County and the unincorporated County on the basis of the size and the population in each jurisdiction. The current program is set to expire in May 2004. New legislation allows the local service authorities to extend the programs every ten years with the approval of the county and the majodty of the cities comprising a majodty of the population in the incorporated areas. Adoption of the attached resolution is the first step toward the extension of this important program. FISCAL IMPACT: The program will generate approximately $20,000 per year for the City. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2002- R :~BR OVV NS\C.~xle~AVA CC staffrpt 6-11-02.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE SERVICE FEE COLLECTED ON BEHALF OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY UNTIL MAY 2014 WHEREAS, The Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority was formed on or about June 1, 1994, pursuant to the provisions of California Vehicle Code §§ 92570.7 and 22710 enacted by the Legislature in 1990, which authorized the establishment of a service authority and imposition of a service fee on all registered motor vehicles located within a county. WHEREAS, beginning in June 1994 and continuing to the present, the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority has been the recipient of service fees collected on its behalf by the California Department of Motor Vehicles; and WHEREAS, the service fees received by the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Authority are used to reimburse local govemmental agencies for a portion of their costs incurred as a result of abatement, removal, and disposal as public nuisances of any abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles or parts thereof; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority apportions and distributes service fee proceeds to each member agency according to the formula set forth in California Vehicle Code § 22710; and WHEREAS, since the establishment of the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement program in June 1994 it has disbursed $126,158.47 in service fee proceeds to the City of Temecula and caused the abatement of approximately 1422 abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles within the City limits; and WHEREAS, the service fee collected as part of the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement program is set to expire in May 2004; and WHEREAS, the Legislature recently amended the California Vehicle Code § 9250.7 to allow for and extension of the service fee collected s part of the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement program in increments of up to 10 years each if the Board of Supervisors of the county, by two thirds vote, and a majodty of the cities comprising the majodty of the population of the incorporated areas within the county adopt resolutions providing for the extension of the service fee'; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to the City of Temecula to have the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement program continue beyond its current termination date of May 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Temecula approves the extension of the service fee collected on behalf of the Riverside County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority until May 31, 2014. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of 2002. R:~ROWNS\Code~AVA reso 6-11-02.doc Ron Roberts, Mayor A'FI'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the th day of ,2002, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNClLMEMBERS None NOES: 0 COUNClLMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNClLMEMBERS: None Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:~ROWNS\Code~AVA reso 6-11-O2.doc ITEM 8 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: ~/'~/-~/{l/Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Substitute Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract Map No. 25892 (South side of Pauba Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road and across from the fire station) ,~/ PREPARED BY: ~ff~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (:~lement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. ACCEPT substitute Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for public improvements in Tract Map No. 25892. 2. AUTHORIZE the release of the existing Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Tract Map No. 25892. 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. BACKGROUND: On November 25, 1997, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 25892, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreements with Chong She Wang, Chunghsin Wang, Richard Lin, and Ary Lin. This original subdivider sold the project to Rilington Temecula 32 LLC/By Rilington Communities, LLC. On March 21, 2000, the City Council approved the replacement of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful Performance, Labor and Material, and Monument Bonds. The current subdivider, Rilington Temecula 32 LLC/By Rilington Communities, LLC now wishes to replace or substitute these bonds with new bonds in the same amount posted by a new surety, Gulf Insurance Company. These new bonds shall replace those on file with the City Clerk posted by Frontier Pacific Insurance Company. The new bonds are as follows: Faithful Performance Bond No. BE2653583 in the amount of $859,000 to cover street, drainage, sewer, and water improvements. Labor and Materials Bond No. BE2653583 in the amount of $429,500 to secure labor and materials. 1 R:~agdrpt~O02\061 l\tm25892.sub fp &Im bonds The following existing bonds shall be released to the current surety, Frontier Pacific Insurance Company as follows: Faithful Performance Bond No. SD00014179 in the amount of $859,000 to cover street, drainage, sewer, and water improvements. Labor and Materials Bond No. SD00014179 in the amount of $429,500 to secure labor and materials. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Substitute Subdivision Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds (On file) 2 R:~agdrpt~2002\0611\tm25892.sub fp & Im bonds x.~ .-~ ~oj~ ,qlte 11 Tract No. 25892 Location NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 9 APP ROVAI.~./, ~ CITYATTORNEY l"~'~"~¢' DIRECTOR OF FINAI~CE ~:~2.-.-- CITY MANAGER ~) t CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: /~l//~Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Street Painting Festival and Great Race Event in Old Town. (Old Town Front Street, between Second Street and Fifth Street and Third Street between Murrieta Creek and Memedes Street) PREPARED BY: ~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (2~Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR THE STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL AND GREAT RACE EVENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS BACKGROUND: The Annual Street Painting Festival scheduled for June 22"~ and 23r~ of this year, necessitates the physical closure of certain streets in the Old Town area, and related detouring, as these streets serve as the canvas on which artists paint. The Great Race Event scheduled for June 22nd of this year will also require street closures to accommodate and provide the "Street Scene" ambience that allows the free movement of pedestrian traffic by minimizing potential vehicular-pedestrian conflicts. The City of Temecula will be a lunch stop host to those participants in the Great Race, a vintage car race from San Antonio Texas to Anaheim California. Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing". The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewaiks, or public right of way. While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was provided for delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these special events. 1 r:~agdrpt~002\061 l~treet painting & great race closure The recommended resotution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the Street Painting Festival and G rear Race Event sponsored by the City of Temecula. This authority is limited to and delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject to the approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council. These rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101. This years Street Painting Festival requires the closure of Old Town Front Street between Fifth Street and Second Street and Third Street from Murrieta Creek to Mercedes Street from 6:00 AM on Saturday June 22nd, 2002 to 5:00 PM on Sunday June 23rd, 2002. The Great Race Event also requires the closure of Old Town Front Street between Fifth Street and Second Street and Third Street from Murrieta Creek to Mercedes Street from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM on Saturday June 22nd, 2002. A detour is proposed on Second Street to Mercedes Street. Main Street will remain open. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated costs for the Public Works Department Maintenance Division support is estimated at $2,300.00. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 001-164-601-5402. ATrACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2002- 2. Location Map 2 r:~gdrpt~002\061 l~street painting & great race closure F RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR THE STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL AND GREAT RACE EVENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and, WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to authorize the closure of public streets for the Street Painting Festival and Great Race Event sponsored by the City of Temecula, for which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those streets for the special event; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily close public streets for the Street Painting Festival and Great Race Event; and, NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve temporary street closures for the Street Painting Festival and Great Race Event sponsored by the City of Temecula, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporarystreet closures shall be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the Street Painting Festival nd rd scheduled from 6:00 AM Saturday June 22 , 2002 to 5:00 PM Sunday June 23 , 2002 and Great Race Event scheduled from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM Saturday June 22"d, 2002 and establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be approved or denied approval by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W.Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~.gdrpt~002\061 l~treet painting & great race closure [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) l, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1 l~h day of June 2002, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: 4 r:~agdrpt~O02\061 l~street painting & great race closure k k,N~ 2 p~g '~ 'kk , sp~/on~ e~h xx x si~ of s~t for /~ ~ s~tp~g ~GEHD: Sa~y morning Sa~y, June 22 6 a.m. m Sun~yJune 23 5 p.m. B. G~ ~CE CLOS~ ~, Samr~y, June 22 10a-2p C. ~C~AY G~T ~ D. FOOD ~, ~A P~S (see a~ched) ~ . . ~,, ~.~ F. MOV~ ~ CLOS~ FOR H. ~SIC, Comer Fron~n ~'~ Gr~ ~ P~k Gr~ ~e Route ~eet dosure ITEM 10 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.~.~/~_ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council & FROM: /'~fIWilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Ali-Way Stop Sign Installation- Overland Drive and Commerce Center Drive PREPARED BY~ Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2002-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE BACKGROUND: Since the opening of the Iow-flow crossing on Via Montezuma and increased use of Overland Drive, staff has received several requests to review the feasibility of installing Multi- Way Stop signs at the intersection of Overland Drive and Commerce Center Drive. A Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis was performed at the intersection to determine if the minimum warrant criteria for the installation of Multi-Way Stop signs is satisfied. At their meeting of May 23, 2002, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered the results of the Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis and unanimously (4-0) approved the staff recommendation that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing an Ali-Way Stop at the intersection of Overland Drive and Commerce Center Drive. In addition to the Multi-Way Stop signs, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approved the staff recommendation to establish a parking restriction in the immediate area of the intersection (E~ibit "A") to accommodate turning mo,,ements at the intersection. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in Public Works Signing and Striping Account. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2002- 2. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report - May 23, 2002 1 r;~Agenda Repod',2002~061202\stopoverlandddve.reso RESOLUTION 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the facts justifying the need for the stop signs proposed for the location described in this resolution. The City Council hereby finds and determines that installation of the stop signs pursuant to this resolution will enhance the public health and safety and general welfare at this location and the proposed stop signs will not create any adverse conditions in the area. SECTION 2. 'Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, the following Ali-Way Stop intersection is hereby established in the City of Temecula. Overland Drive and Commerce Center Drive SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cedify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of June, 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 2 r:~Agenda Report~002\061202\stopovedanddrive reso [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 11th day of June, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNClLMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNClLMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~Agenda Report~002\061202\stopovedanddrive.reso AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission ~"~Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, FROM: Traffic DATE: May 23, 2002 SUBJECT: Item 3 Multi-Way Stop Signs - Commerce Center Drive at Overland Drive RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing a Multi-Way Stop control at the intersection of Commerce Center Drive and Overland Drive. BACKGROUND: Since the opening of the low-flow crossing on Via Montezuma and increased use of Overland Drive, staffbas received several requests to review the feasibility of installing Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of Commerce Center Drive and Overland Drive. An evah~ation of traffic conditions has been performed at the intersection to determine if minimum warrant criteria for the installation of Multi-Way Stop signs is satisfied. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this matter through the age~da notification process. Commerce Center Drive is classified as a 56 foot wide two (2) lane Principal Collector on the City's General Plan Circulation Element with one travel lane in each direction and on-street parking on both sides of the street. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Commerce Center Drive is approximately 4,200 north of Overland Drive and approximately 4,900 south of Overland Drive. The speed limit is posted at 25 MPH on Commerce Center Drive. Overland Drive is classified as a 64 foot wide four (4) lane Secondary Highway on the City's General Plan Circulation Element with two travel lanes in each direction and on-street parking on both sides of the street. Currently, Overland Drive west of Jefferson Avenue is a 44 foot wide two (2) lane roadway with parking on each side of the street. Overland Drive carries approximately 8,800 ADT east of Commerce Center Drive. The speed limit is posted at 35 MPH on Overland Drive between Commerce Center Drive and Jefferson Avenue. In order to evaluate the need for Multi,Way'Stop signs, entering vehicular volume data was collected and a review of the accident history was performed for the intersection. This data was used to perform a Multi: Way Stop Warrant analysis. A review of the accident history for the twelve (12) month period from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001, indicates that there was one reported collision at this intersection. This indicates that the majority of driverg exercise due care when traveling {brough the intersection. The Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that the Multi-Way Stop signs may be useful at locations where the volume of traffic on intersecting roads is approximately equal and/or where a combination of high speed, restricted sight distance and an accident historyindicates that assignment of right-of-way is necessary. Multi- Way Stop controls should not be used for controlling vehicular speed. There are three (3) criteria that Caltrans has established for the evaluation of Multi-Way Stop signs. These criteria are as follows: 1. Where signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installations. 2. An accident problem, as indicated by five (5) or more reported accidents within a twelve (12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Minimum Traffic Volumes a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day, and b. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight (8) hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but c. When the 85t~ pementile approach speed of the major street ~raffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70percent of the above requirements. The Multi-Way Stop Warrant analysis performed for the intersection indicates that the minimum traffic volume warrant is satisfied and Multi-Way Stop signs are warranted at the intersection. Therefore, staffrecolnmends the installation of Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of Commerce Center Drive at Overland Drive. In addition to the installation of the multi-way stop signs, staff is recommending the installation of parking restrictions in the immediate area of the intersection to accommodate turning movements at the intersection. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Account. Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis ITEM 11 APPROVal CItY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of finaNf3e~ CITY MANAGER ./L~- ' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: /~¢William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project - Hydrology Study, Project No. PW02-07 PREPARED BY: er Attar, Senior Engineer-CIP ~ Laura Bragg, Project Engineer - CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $55,400.00 to provide design services for the John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project - Hydrology Study, Project No. PW02-07, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments/change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $ 5,540.00 which is equal to 10% of the agreement. BACKGROUND: The overall project will ultimately complete the asphalt concrete paving of rural dirt roads including Santiago Road, John Warner Road from Santiago Road to Jeramie Drive, Lolita Road, Paulita Road, La Presa Loop and Colver Court. the portion of the project covered under this contract consists of performing a Hydrology and Hydraulics Study and report preparation, calculation of amount of annual sediment transport, and preparation of storm drain plans and profiles. Design services will include the preparation of plans and specifications as needed to accompany the street improvement plans that have already been prepared by a private engineer and are under review. City staff evaluated five proposals received for providing professional engineering design services as outlined in Request for Proposal No. 109. The firms were ranked, and negotiations for the contract commenced with the number one ranked firm, Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. of Hemet, California. FISCAL IMPACT: the John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project- Hydrology Study is a Capital Improvement Project funded through Capital Project Reserve Funds with the Improvements being constructed through a proposed Assessment District. Adequate funds are available for this project in Account No. 210-165-727-5802 for the subject professional services agreement in the amount of $55,400.00 including the 10 % contingency amount of $5,540.00 for a total amount of $60,940.00. 1 R:~AGENDA REPORTS~002~061102~PW02-07John Warner h~lrology. DOC ATrACHMENTS: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description 3. Professional Services Agreement 2 R:~AGENDA REPORTS~2002~061102\PW02-07John Warner Hydrology. DOC CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY STUDY SERVICES JOHN WARNER/SANTIAGO ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NO. PW02-07 THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of June 11,2002, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc., ("Consultant"). In consideration ofthe mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on June 11,2002, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2003, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25~00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the previsions of the Contract. 5. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Fifty Five Thousand Four Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($55,400.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. riCJD~Droiects\DW02-07'~notneerino Resources Aormt/~in b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work up to the ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, as authorized by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6, SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior wdtten notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under th is Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by wdtten notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be cleady identi- fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained fora period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3 (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: One Million Dollars $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-lnsurad Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4 (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptabilit,/of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Covera(~e. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 5 r:cip~rojects~owO2-07~Engineering Resources Agrml/ajD 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without wdtten authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in wdting and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Consultant: Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. 3550 East Florida Avenue, Suite B Hemet, California 92544 Attention: Matt Brudin, P.E. President 15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without pdor wdtten consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation conceming this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All pdor or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or wdtten, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each pady's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 7 r:cip~projects\pw02-07\Engineering Resources Agrmt/ajp IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OFTEMECULA Ron Roberts, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Engineering Resources of So. California, Inc. 3550 E. Florida Ave., Suite B Hemet, CA 92544 (909) 765-6622 Matt Brudin, P.E., President By: Name: Title: (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) r:dp~rojects~w02-07\Englneering Resources Agrmt/ajp EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. SECTION 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES The successful completion of any engineering project is incumbent upon adequate pla~. ing and strict adherence to a cogent work plan. As part of any project undertaken at Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc., an in-depth analysis of the tasks required to complete the project is performed. This analysis will result in a list of tasks that, when properly arranged, will cause the project to flow in a smooth, uninterrupted manner from beginning to end. Considering our knowledge of flood control systems, preliminary research and past experience with similar projects, the following work plan represents Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. 's approach to the preparation and analysis of alternative facilities alignments, the development of contract documents and resolving the issues affecting each alignment identified during the preparation of this proposal. During our evaluation of available records and site visits, our engineers identified certain issues which will effect the analysis of the potential alignments for John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project. These issues include: Cross drainage impacting John Warner Road; Lack of adequate flood control facilities downstream of John WalTler Road; and n The impacts of the concentrated storm flows and sediment on downstream properties. Our work plan is developed around the resolution of these issues and the identification of others which may not be apparent at this time. Rapid identification and resolution of other issues is paramount to controlling the progress of each phase of the project and overall project schedule. WORK PLAN ' ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT UTILITYAND RIGHT-OF-WAY RESEARCH -- Utility and fight-of-way research will form the foundation for the preparation of the project base map. Utility research will be initiated by written request for record drawings from the various utility purveyors including the Rancho California Water District, Southern California Edison, the Gas Company, Verizon and Adelphia. Given the schedule requirements, it will be necessary to expedite the acquisition of record drawings from the utility companies. In keeping with City practice, staffhas requested record drawings from City of Temecula RFP No. 109 John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project Page 15 Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. the various utilities outlined above. Upon receipt of the record data from City staff, it will be reviewed, field verified and cataloged for use in future tasks. Right-of-way reseamh will be conducted at the City of Temecula, the County of Riverside Surveyors Offices, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and through local Title Companies. Data required to accurately develop a project base map, include parcel and tract maps, deeds, easements and other record documents affecting the configuration of record parcels in the study area. BASE MAP PRE PARATION-- Development of viable system alternatives is ultimately a function of the quality and accuracy of the base map. Base map preparation will utilize parcel data obtained during right-of-way research. Initial mapping efforts will focus on verifying parcel data acquired in the previous task. The project base map will be developed using record data to calculate parcel lines, street center line, street right- of-way and public easements. Once line work is complete, basic parcel information such Assessor's Parcel Numbers will be added to the map. Finally, existing utilities will be inserted into the drawing to provide the complete base map. Where possible, utilities will be located by offset from the center line of the right-of-way to give an accurate reflection of available pipeline corridors. Utility information shown on the base map will include water and sewer lines, power and communications facilities, gas and drainage and flood control systems. Once completed, the final base map will be forwarded to the affected utility purveyors for final review and verification of utility location and extent. HYDROLOGY STUDY--Hydrology studies will be initiated consistent with the methods and criteria outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's Hydrology Manual. Hydrologic models will be developed for the areas tributary to John Warner Road from Santiago Road to Jeramie Road. Hydrology calculations will be prepared for both the 10- and 100-year return frequency storm. Calculations will be based on subareas derived from either Riverside County Flood Control topography or topography jointly prepared by the City of Temecula and the Rancho California Water District. The hydrologic models will reflect, as accurately as possible, the existing improvements within the watershed under consideration. Once completed, the hydrology calculations will be forwarded to City Staff for review. This intermediate submittal is crucial to the accurate development of future phases of the project. Prior to completing subsequent phases of the project, City comments on the hydrology will be incorporated to ensure the most accurate data is employed during the generation of system alternatives. City of Temecula RFP No. 109 John tVarner/$antiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project Page 16 Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. The hydrology study will include a narrative describing the characteristics of the watershed, methods used to develop runoff values, a comparison of runoff predictions and a discussion of the study outcome. SEDIMENT ANALYSIS Each alternative under consideration will be subject to sedimentation resulting from erosion in the headwaters of each watershed. Therefore, an analysis of the annual sediment yield will be conducted for the area tributary to John Warner Road. Sediment yield can be determined by methods developed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, the Army Corp's of Engineers or the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Each method considers a set of variables, some of which are consistent between methods such as watershed area, watershed slope, rainfall intensity and runoff quantities. Each of these quantities, and others not stated, can have far reaching implications when developing sediment yield. For this reason, multiple methods will be investigated to determine the most conservation method available for estimating sediment yield in the basin under consideration. Once the sediment yield had been estimated, methods of sediment control will be developed using Soil Conservation Service guidelines. Sediment control will ultimately be a combination of preventative measures aimed at controlling erosion and protective measures whose purpose it is to regulate the movement of sediment through the basin and onto downstream properties. SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES -- System alternatives will be generated giving consideration to existing infrastructure, environmental issues, the hydrology of the watershed, regulation of sediment, location of available right-of-way, minimizing required right-of-way and location of adequate outlet facilities. Although many alternatives may be considered, only the two most viable will be mapped for presentation to the City. Prior to initiating development of system alternatives, meetings will be held with City staff. Initial discussions will establish a list of project goals, identify issues to be resolved and verify design criteria to be used during alternative development and analysis. The final system alternatives will be those that best fit project goals, design criteria and the other factors listed above. Once determined, the final alternatives will be inserted into the base map to create a System Alternatives Map. Information provided for each alternative will include location, size and flow rate. In addition, in-depth project descriptions will be developed for each alternative. Once completed, the System Alternatives Map and Systems Descriptions will be forwarded to the City. Subsequently, meetings will be held to receive comments on the proposed alternatives. Comments received at these meetings will be incorporated into the information provided prior to initiating the final phase of the analysis. City of Teraecula RFP No. 109 John tYarner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project Page 17 Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS -- A hydraulic analysis will be prepared for each system alternative under consideration. Hydraulic calculations will give consideration to outlet and inlet control, system geometry, sediment control measures, and system appurtenances. Hydraulic models will be developed based on preliminary system layouts and will include allowances for manhole and junction losses. All hydraulic calculations will be prepared using WSPG for pipelines and channels and CivilDesign for reservoir routing calculations. ANALYSIS AND RECOMNII'~NDATIONS --Upon completion of the system hydraulics, each alternative will be analyzed and ranked. However, prior to initiating the formal analysis a construction cost estimate for each alternative must be prepared. Each estimate will include the costs for labor and materials, permanent and temporary rights-of-way, and soft costs covering the preparation of environmental studies and documents, engineering and surveying, geotechnical engineering and project management and inspection. Formal alternative analysis will include comparison of the attributes of each system to the project goals established during the Alternative Development phase of the project. Additional comparisons will be made on the basis of overall project cost, public safety, convenience to the traveling public, disruption of public infrastructure and environmental considerations. Upon completion of the analysis, each alternative will be ranked giving consideration to all applicable criteria. The highest ranking alternative will then be recommended as the most appropriate for the John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project. The final analysis of each alternative will be reduced to writing and presented to City Staff for review. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS-- Final design will commence once the alternatives have been ranked and a recommended alternative has been selected and accepted by City staff. Final design of the recommended alternative will include a horizontal layout of the proposed storm drain, location of catch basins, connector pipes and manholes or junction structures. In addition, a profile of the proposed facility will be developed based on the inlet and outlet conditions, the location of existing utilities and the location of catch basins. Construction drawings will be submitted at 60 and 90 percent complete. The 60 percent submittal will include the horizontal and vertical alignment of the proposed improvements and preliminary location of appurtenant facilities such as catch basins, sediment control structures and headwalls. Upon completion of the 60 percent submittal, the system hydraulics will be revised to reflect any changes in system configuration experienced as a result of preliminary design. Major changes in cross section resulting from more refined design data may result in further analysis of the recommended alternative to ensure the design being advanced is the most effective alternative. City of Temecula RFP No. 109 John I~arner/$antiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project Page 18 Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. The 90 percent submittal of construction drawings will include construction drawings and specifications that are essentially complete. The 90 percent submittal will include a title sheet, plan and profile sheets for the proposed improvements and details of catch basins, headwalls, connector pipe profiles and sediment control structures. Specifications provided at 90 percent complete will include the bid schedule, technical provisions and special provisions for use in compiling the specifications for the John Wamer/ Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project. Finally, the cost estimate prepared during the analysis of alternatives will be updated to reflect the more advanced state of design. The final cost estimate will detail the costs associated with labor and materials for storm drain and street construction, permanent and temporary rights-of-way, and soft costs covering the materials testing, project management and inspection. Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. has identified a number of specific tasks necessary to complete the hydrology report and contract documents for the John Wamer/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project. These tasks have been formulated based on our experience with similar projects and the City's Request for Proposal. Our specific goal is to provide the City a complete analysis of alignment alternatives with minimal staff involvement. ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPfiAENT UTILITYAND RIGHT-OF-WAY RESEARCH - Acquire parcel and tract maps, Records of Survey, deeds and easements from the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, and Metropolitan Water District. Review and field verify record drawings from Rancho California Water District, the Southern California Edison Company, The Gas Company, Vefizon and Adelphia provided by City staff. PROJECT BASE NIAP - Using record data acquired during previous tasks, prepare a base map of the project area including parcel lines, street centerlines, curb lines from preliminary construction drawings, right-of-way lines and public easements. In addition, the base map will include parcel identification such Assessor's Parcel Number, record utility information and other public infrastructure such as existing drainage facilities. HYDROLOGY STUDY- Prepare a hydrology study of the area tributary to John Warner Road. The study will be based on the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's Hydrology Manual and will determine the 10- and 100- year rnnoff tributary to John Warner Road. Required mapping for the preparation of the proposed hydrology study will be based on Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) topography or topography recently developed by the City and the Rancho California Water District in a joint mapping effort. City of Temeeula RFP No. 109 John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project Page 19 Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. SEDIMENTANALY$I$ - Prepare an analysis of the known methods of developing sediment yield to determine the method most applicable to the area tributary to John Warner Road. Based on this analysis, develop an estimate of the sediment yield for the watershed under consideration. Once the sediment yield has been estimated, develop methods of sediment control including structural and non-structural improvements. Non-structural improvements will include erosion control methods applied in the headwaters of the watershed. Structural improvements may include debris basins, debris walls or other methods of grade stabilization. SYSTEMALTERNATIVES- Develop a maximum of two alternative system configurations giving consideration to structural and non-structural improvements and the locations of existing flood control facilities, utilities and rights-of-way. Map the proposed system alternatives and prepare written project descriptions for each alternative. Submit the written project ~lescriptions to City staff for review and input. Meet with City staffthe receive input and discuss comments. ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS - Prepare a hydraulic analysis of each alternative under consideration. Hydraulic calculations will be prepared using WSPG for the analysis of mainline storm drains, cross drainage and open channels. Basin routing calculations will be prepared using CivilDesign sottware. ANALYSIS AND RECO/vlNI. ENDATIONS - Prepare an analysis of the alternative systems based on an established set of criteria. Develop a written comparison based on the recommended criteria, project costs and other factors such as environmental considerations. Provide a written recommendation as to the most viable system alternative. Meet with City staffto review the outcome of the analysis and comparison of the system alternatives and present the recommended system configuration. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FIELD SURVEY-- Conduct field surveys necessary to augment record data and verify existing improvements and adjacent grading. Information collected during field surveys will be located horizontally and vertically to within one-tenth of a foot. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY-- If required, establish horizontal and vertical control necessary for the development of aerial topography. Commission the preparation of aerial topography for John Warner Road from Santiago Road to Jeramie Road, Lolita Road, Paulita Road, La Presa Loop and Clover Court. Topography will be mapped at 40 scale with a one-foot contour interval. Actual limits of topography, within those defined above, will be identified subsequent to the adoption of the recommended alternative. City of Temecula RFP No. 109 John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project Page 20 Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. BASE SHEETS-- Prepare base sheets for construction drawings by combining topography, cultural data and parcel data and other line work developed in previous tasks. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS - Based on the recommended system configuration and using the proposed street plan as base sheets, prepare final construction drawings for the proposed drainage improvements. Construction drawings for storm drain improvements will be prepared at 40 scale and will include the location of drainage facilities, manholes, catch basins, sediment control features and features appurtenant to storm drain construction. Construction drawings will be submitted the City for review at 60 and 90 percent complete. Final submittal of the construction drawings will include one set of original mylars for signature and digital files in AutoCad 2000. SPECIFICATIONS - Prepare specifications for the construction of drainage improvements along John Warner Road. Sections detailing quality of materials, workmanship and methods of construction will be based on the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Sections to be provided under this task include project description, bid schedule, technical specifications and special provisions. COST ESTIMATES- Final cost estimates for the proposed improvements will be submitted to the City at 90 percent complete and with the final submittal. Cost estimates will be provided on the overall project cost based on the items of work contained in the bid schedule provided with the specifications. City of Temecula RFP No. 109 John Warner/Santiago Road dssessment District Improvement Project Page 2 l EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. SECTION 3 SCHEDULE A Project schedule for the completion of the John WarnedSantiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project has been generated considering the work tasks necessary to complete the design and the requirements of the City's Request for Proposal. A graphic representation of the project schedule is included in this section for review by City staff. The proposed schedule has been prepared under the assumption that Notice to Proceed will be issued June 17, 2002. Further, we have assumed that intermediate submittals will be reviewed and returned within one week. City of Temecula RFP No. 109 John Warner/Santiago Road.4ssessment District Improvement Project Page 22 Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. SECTION 4 MANPOWER ESTIMATE An estimate of man hours is presented in the following table. This estimate has been prepared considering the specific tasks outlined in our scope of services and the proposed project team. Man hours estimated for the completion of construction drawings are based on the development of improvement plans for the mainline storm drain. Because the ultimate solution to drainage and sediment control on John Warner Road has not been studied, estimated hours may fluctuate depending on the chosen alternative. city of Temecula RFP No. 109 John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District Improvement Project Page 24 Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates (EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,2002) PRINCIPAL ............... $135.00 PRINCIPAL PLANNER ....... $95.00 PRINCIPAL ENGINEER ..... 115.00 SENIOR PLANNER ......... 85.00 SENIOr CiVil ENgiNeer .. 95.00 ASSOCIATE PLAnNEr ...... 70.00 ASSOCIATE CiVIl ENGINEER 80.00 ASSISTANT PLANNer ...... 50.00 ASSISTANT CIVIl ENGiNEEr 65.00 EngiNEEriNg TEChniCiaN Ii 75.00 ExecutiVE SECrETarY .... 45.00 ENglneeRiNgTEChnlClaN [ 60.00 SEcrETary .............. 40.00 ENgiNEErINg TEChNICIaN 50.00 CONSTrUCTiON MaNAger .............................. 2.6 X Direct SALARY RESIdENt ENgINEEr ................................... 2.6 X DIreCT SALARY SeNiOr InsPECtOr .................................... 2.6 x DIreCT SaLAry INSPECtOr ............................................ 2.6 X Direct SaLARY SURVEY Crew (2-PERSON) $160.00 SURVEY Crew (3-PERSON) $175.00 Travel Time .............................................. 50% Crew Rate Mileage ...................................................... $0.38/mile DIRECT COST .................................................. COST + 15% TeSTiMONY UNDER OATH Will BE BILLED AT $220 PER Hour With a four (4) Hour minimum ITEM 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Acquisition Agreement between the City and Claim Jumper Restaurant PREPARED BY: Brian Guillot, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve and execute in substantially the form attached hereto, the PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND CLAIM JUMPER-TEMECULA for the acquisition of certain real property in the amount of $50,000. 2. Authorize the City Clerk to record the document. BACKGROUND: On February 26, 2002 the City Council authorized staff to begin negotiations for the acquisition of certain real properties required for the construction of the Rancho California Road Widening project. On April 2, 2002, the City delivered to Claim Jumper Restaurant an offer to purchase the real property interests described in the Agreement, which include a temporary construction easement. Those negotiations have concluded as set forth herein. The attached Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions describe the details for the acquisition of the real property interests necessary to construct the improvements for the widening of Rancho California Road, east of Ynez Road. FISCAL IMPACT: The project, Rancho California Road Widening East of Ynez Road, is funded through Capital Project Reserves and is included in the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 2001-2005. Adequate Capital Project Reserves are available for the acquisition of the subject property rights. The total acquisition cost is $50,000.00 for the real property interests and temporary construction easement. ATTACHMENTS: Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions. R:\agdrpt\00\l 114\jointaccessagre.acs 1 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND CLAIM JUMPER-TEMECULA (RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD WIDENING, PROJECT NO. PW00-20) THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS ("Agreement") is dated and entered into as of ,2002 by and between the Claim Jumper-Temecula, a California corporation ("Seller"), and the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation ("Buyer"), and constitutes both an agreement to purchase and sell real property between the parties and the parties' escrow instructions directed to First American Title Insurance Company ("Escrow Holder"). RECITALS A. On April 2, 2002, the Buyer delivered Seller an offer (the "Offer") to purchase the real property interests described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property") pursuant to Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (Section 7260, et seq.). B. Buyer intends to use the Property for public purposes. C. Seller desires to sell and Buyer desires to buy, the Property on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, operative provisions and the recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purchase and Sale. On the Close of Escrow (as herein defined), Seller agrees to sell the Property to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to buy the Property from Seller, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. Purchase Price. The total purchase price for the Property to be paid by Buyer is the sum of fifty thousand and 00/100 dollars ($50,000.00) (the "Purchase Price"), which sum shall be paid in full in cash on the Close of Escrow. 3. Title and Title Insurance. Upon the Opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder shall order from First American Title Company ('q'itle Company") a title commitment for the Property. Escrow Holder shall also request two copies each of all instruments identified as exceptions on said title commitment. Upon receipt of the foregoing, Escrow Holder shall deliver these instruments and the title commitment to Buyer and Seller. Buyer's fee title to the Property shall be insured at the Close of Escrow by a CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price (the "Policy"). The Policy of title insurance provided for pursuant to this Section shall insure Buyer's fee interest in the Property free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, restrictions, and rights-of-way of record, subject only to the following permitted conditions of title ("Permitted Title Exceptions"): (a) The applicable zoning, building and development regulations of any municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting the Property; and Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 1 (b) Those non-monetary exceptions approved by Buyer within fifteen (15) business days after the date Buyer receives the title commitment and legible copies of all instruments noted as exceptions therein. If Buyer unconditionally disapproves any such exceptions, Escrow shall thereupon terminate, all funds deposited therein shall be refunded to Buyer (less Buyer's share of escrow cancellation charges), and this Agreement shall be of no further force or effect. If Buyer conditionally disapproves any such exceptions, then Seller shall use Seller's best efforts to cause such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. If such conditionally disapproved non-monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, Buyer may, at Buyer's option, either accept the Property subject to such encumbrances, or terminate the Escrow and receive a refund of all funds deposited into Escrow (less Buyer's share of escrow cancellation charges), if any, and this Agreement shall thereupon be of no further force or effect. At the Close of Escrow, Buyer's fee title to the Property shall be free and clear of all monetary encumbrances. 4. Grant Deed. Seller covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder prior to the Close of Escrow a Grant Deed duly executed and acknowledged by Seller, granting and conveying to Buyer the Property. The Grant Deed shall be in a form satisfactory to Buyer and Buyer's counsel and shall be accepted by Buyer prior to recording. Authorization to Record Documents and Disburse Funds. Escrow Holder is hereby authorized to record the documents and disburse the funds and documents called for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow, provided each of the following conditions has then been fulfilled: (a) Title Company can issue in favor of Buyer the Policy, showing the Property vested in Buyer subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions. Escrow Holder shall use the proceeds of the Purchase Price to obtain partial reconveyance, if necessary, of any monetary liens encumbering the Property, so that the Property shall be free and clear of monetary liens and encumbrances at the Close of Escrow. (b) Escrow Holder shall have received Buyer's notice of approval or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies to Buyer's obligations hereunder, as provided for in Section 11; and (c) Seller shall have deposited in Escrow the Grant Deed required by Section 4. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is authorized to record at the Close of Escrow any instrument delivered through this Escrow if necessary or proper for issuance of the Policy, including the Grant Deed. 6. Escrow. The parties hereby establish an escrow ("Escrow") to accommodate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, Opening of Escrow shall mean the date on which Escrow Holder shall have received a fully executed original of this Agreement from Buyer and Seller. Close of Escrow shall be the date upon which the Grant Deed to Buyer is delivered and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The Close of Escrow shall be on the date, which is not later than the first business day occurring sixty (60) days after the date of this Agreement. Before the Close of Escrow, all risk of loss and damage to the Property from any source whatsoever shall be solely that of Seller. Buyer shall pay all escrow costs. Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 2 7. Escrow Charqes and Prorations. Buyer shall pay for the cost of the CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, the Escrow fees and Escrow Holder's customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long distance telephone, etc. Buyer shall pay for recording the Grant Deed and any documentary or other local transfer taxes, and any other recording fees. If the Escrow shall fail to close through no fault of either party, Buyer shall pay all Escrow cancellation charges. The parties further agree and hereby authorize and instruct Escrow Agent to comply with the following tax adjustment procedures: (a) The term "Date of Apportionment" will refer to the date that the conveyance is made to Buyer, is recorded, or if the County Tax Collector and Assessor deem it acceptable, the date on which the Grant Deed was accepted by Buyer, whichever is earlier. (b)(1) Escrow Agent will, on behalf of Buyer, send the County Assessor, Auditor, and Tax Collector copies of the instrument evidencing the acquisition of the subject property by Buyer. This instrument must indicate the date of apportionment as defined above. (b)(2) Escrow Agent will forward to County Assessor, Auditor, and Tax Collector letters asking these agencies to cancel taxes on the acquired Property for the remaining portion of the fiscal year after the date of apportionment. Attached to this letter will be a copy of a map of the acquired property and a legal description of the acquired property. Prior to forwarding the material to these County agencies, Escrow Agent will ensure that the materials are complete and contact Buyer if they are not complete. (c) Seller will be liable for any unpaid taxes, including any penalties or costs levied for prior tax years constituting a lien at the date of apportionment. Seller will pay Escrow Agent sufficient funds to cover any such lien, or Escrow Agent will deduct the amount of such liens from proceeds of sale prior to remittance to Seller. Escrow Agent will forward such amount to the County as part of the process of closing escrow. (d) If the date of apportionment occurs after the lien date, but prior to the commencement of the fiscal year for which taxes are a lien on the property, no adjustment will be made to escrow proceeds. (e) If the date of apportionment occurs after commencement of the fiscal year for which current taxes are a lien on the property, Seller will be liable for the portion of current taxes and any penalties and costs that are allocable to the part of the fiscal year that ends on the day before the date of apportionment. Seller will pay Escrow Agent sufficient funds to cover any such taxes, penalties, and costs, or Escrow Agent will deduct the amount of such taxes, penalties, and costs from proceeds of sale prior to remittance to Seller. Escrow Agent will forward such amount to the County as part of the process of closing escrow. (f) If Seller has paid in advance any taxes on the property required by Buyer pursuant to this escrow, Seller will be entitled to apply to the County for a refund Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 3 of such taxes and Buyer will not contest such application or request that Buyer be paid a portion of such prepayment. This paragraph will only apply to taxes for the remainder of the fiscal year, beginning with and including the date of apportionment, and will only apply to the property acquired by Buyer. (g) If for any reason Buyer is held liable for any underpayment of taxes by Seller for that period when the acquired property was owned by Seller, Seller hereby agrees to reimburse Buyer even if escrow has already closed. (g)(1) All tax amounts described herein, whether paid, refunded, retained, or otherwise dealt with, will be for the property actually conveyed herein, such that said taxes will be calculated for the conveyed portion of the property conveyed herein as a portion of a larger Assessor's pamel. (g)(2) It is the intent of all parties that each party will be responsible for the taxes on the portion of the property acquired/retained by him/her/itself. Seller will be responsible for paying all taxes on the parcel, as defined by the Assessor, including pursuant to the other provisions of these instructions and excepting no more than the taxes on the conveyed portion after the date of apportionment. (g)(3) (i) If the County has established separate values for the conveyed portion prior to the date of apportionment, those values will be used in determining the tax amounts in question; and (ii) If the County has not established a separate value, with separate taxes, for the conveyed portion prior to the date of apportionment, the taxes on the conveyed portion will be calculated by multiplying the taxes for the entire parcel (land only) as defined by the Assessor by the percentage conveyed. (h) Should the provisions of Article 5, Chapter 4, Part 9, Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code governing acquisitions of property by public agencies be changed during the term of escrow, any terms of this escrow in conflict with the law then prevailing will be automatically deemed to be no longer in effect. 8. License to Enter. Seller hereby grants to Buyer and Buyer's authorized agents, contractors, consultants, assigns, attorneys, accountants and other representatives an irrevocable license to enter upon the Property for the purpose of making inspections and other examinations of the Property, including, but not limited to, the right to perform soil and geological tests of the Property and an environmental site assessment thereof. Buyer shall give Seller reasonable notice before going on the Property. Buyer does hereby indemnify and forever save Seller, Seller's heirs, successors and assigns, and the Property, free and harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, damages and costs and expenses, demands, causes of action, claims or judgments, whether or not arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Property as a result of any accident or other occurrence at the Property which is in any way connected with Buyer's inspections or non-permanent improvements involving entrance onto the Property pursuant to this Section. If Buyer fails to acquire the Property due to Buyer's default, this license shall terminate upon the termination of Buyer's right to purchase the Property. In such event, Buyer shall remove or cause to be removed all Buyer's personal property, facilities, tools and equipment from the Property. Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 4 9. Warranties and Representations of Seller. Seller hereby represents and warrants to Buyer the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and shall survive the Close of Escrow: (a) That (i) on the Close of Escrow the Property shall be free and clear of any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials, and waste, including, but not limited to, asbestos; (ii) the Property is in compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations, including environmental, health and safety requirements; (iii) all businesses on the Property have disposed of their waste in accordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations; and (iv) Seller has no notice of any pending or threatened action or proceeding arising out of the condition of the Property or alleged violation of environmental, health or safety statutes, ordinance or regulations To this end, it is agreed that notwithstanding the conveyance of the Property to Buyer, Seller shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Buyer from and against any and all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, costs, expenses and damages, including but not limited to attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of any claim for loss or damage to any property, including the Properly, injuries to or death of persons, or for the cost of cleaning up the Property and removing hazardous or toxic substances, materials and waste therefrom, by reason of contamination or adverse effects on the environment, or by reason of any statutes, ordinances, orders, rules or regulations of any governmental entity or agency requiring the clean-up of the Property, caused by or resulting from any hazardous material, substance or waste existing on, under or about the Property on the Close of Escrow. (b) That Seller is the sole owner of the Property free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments from adjacent properties, encroachments by improvements or vegetation on the Property onto adjacent property, or rights of way of any nature, other than those that may appear on the title commitment. Seller shall not further encumber the Property or allow the Properly or to be further encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow. (c) Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder including the transfer of the Property to Buyer, violates or shall violate any contract, agreement or instrument to which Seller is a party, or which affects the Property, and the sale of the Property herein contemplated does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto. (d) There are no mechanics', materialmen's, or similar claims or liens presently claimed or which will be claimed against the Property for work performed or commenced prior to the date of this Agreement. Seller agrees to hold Buyer harmless from all costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including attorney fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or any similar lien claimed against the Property and arising from work performed or commenced prior to the Close of Escrow. (e) There are no written or oral leases or contractual right or option to lease, purchase, or otherwise enjoy possession, rights or interest of any nature in and to the Property or any part thereof, and no persons have any right of possession to the Property or any part thereof. Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 5 (f) Seller has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential litigation, action or proceeding against Seller or any other Party before any court or administrative tribunal that is in any way related to the Property. 10. FULL PAYMENT OF ALL OBLIGATIONS OF CITY. (a) It is understood and agreed between Seller and Buyer that the payments made to Seller as set forth in this Agreement represent an all inclusive settlement and is full and complete payment for just compensation for the acquisition of all property interests pertaining to the Property and includes and satisfies any and all other payments, if any, which may be required by law to be paid to Seller arising out of the acquisition and displacement of the Seller and persons residing on the Property, and specifically includes, but is not limited to, claims for severance and other damages, attorney's fees, interest, expenses of litigation, expert's fees, precondemnation damages, inverse condemnation, owner participation rights under the Redevelopment Plan, relocation assistance and/or benefits under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq.), if applicable, or under Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (Section 7260, et seq.), and loss of business goodwill under the Eminent Domain Law, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510, and all costs and expenses whatever in connection therewith. Seller hereby acknowledges that Buyer has advised Seller of the possible availability of such relocation assistance rights to Seller and that the waiver of all rights by Seller herein set forth as free and voluntary. (b) This Agreement arose out of Buyer's efforts to acquire the Property through its municipal authority. The parties agree that this Agreement is a settlement of claims in order to avoid litigation. Seller, on behalf of itself and its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby fully releases Buyer, its officials, employees, and agents, from all claims and causes of action by reason of any damage which has been sustained, or may be sustained, as a result of Buyer's efforts to acquire the Property or any preliminary steps thereto. Seller further releases and agrees to hold Buyer harmless from any and all claims and causes of action by reason of any leasehold interest in the Property. (c) Seller acknowledges that it may have sustained damage, loss, costs or expenses which are presently unknown and unsuspected, and such damage, loss, costs or expense which may have been sustained, may give rise to additional damages, loss, costs or expenses in the future. Nevertheless, Seller hereby acknowledges that this Agreement has been negotiated and agreed upon in light of that situation, and hereby expressly waive any and all rights which they may have under California Civil Code Section 1542, or under any statute or common law or equitable principle of similar effect. California Civil Code Section 1542 provides as follows: "A general release does not extend to claims which the Creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." (d) This section shall survive the Close of Escrow. Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 6 11. Buyer's Continclencies. For the benefit of Buyer, the Closing of Escrow and the Buyer's obligation to consummate the purchase of the Property shall be contingent upon and subject to the occurrence of all of the following (or Buyer's written waiver thereof, it being agreed that Buyer can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow: (a) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are all true and correct. (b) The delivery of all documents pursuant to Section 4 hereof. (c) Title Company's commitment to issue in favor of Buyer of a CLTA Standard Coverage Owner's Policy of Title Insurance with liability equal to the Purchase Price showing Buyer's fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions. (d) Buyer's approval prior to the Close of Escrow of any environmental site assessment, soils or geological reports, or other physical inspections of the Property or the underlying real property that Buyer might perform prior to the Close of Escrow. 12. Certification of Non-Foreiqn Status. Seller covenants to deliver to Escrow a certification of Non-Foreign Status in accordance with I.R.C. Section 1445, and a similar notice pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 18805 and 26131, prior to the Close of Escrow. 13. Default. In the event of a breach or default under this Agreement by either Buyer or Seller, the non-defaulting party shall have, in addition to all rights available at law or equity, the right to terminate this Agreement and the Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Property, by delivering written notice thereof to the defaulting party and to Escrow Holder, and if Buyer is the non-defaulting party, Buyer shall thereupon promptly receive a refund of all prior deposits, if any. Such termination of the Escrow by a non-defaulting path/shall be without prejudice to the non-defaulting party's rights and remedies at law or equity. 14. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mail, postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by personal delivery. Notices shall be considered given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery, (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, or (c) one (1) business day following deposit with an overnight carrier service. A copy of all notices shall be sent to Escrow Holder. Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall thereafter be given as demanded in that notice: BUYER: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attn: City Engineer Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 7 SELLER: ESCROW HOLDER 15. Broker's Commissions. Seller shall pay all claims of brokers, agents or finders, licensed or unlicensed, and all claims of real estate or other consultants which exist or may arise as a result of Seller's actions with respect to the Property. Buyer shall not be liable for any such fees or claims and Seller shall indemnify Buyer, its officers, employees and agents, from any and all costs, liabilities or judgments, including attorneys' fees, incurred in defending or paying any such claims. 16. Further Instructions. Each party agrees to execute such other and further escrow instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 17. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be effective only when duly executed by Buyer and Seller and deposited with Escrow Holder. 18. Miscellaneous (a) Al~l~licable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted under, and governed and enforced according to the laws of the State of California. (b) Entire A(:lreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreement, oral or written, and together with the Exhibits hereto and any agreements delivered pursuant hereto, contains the entire agreement between Buyer and Seller on the subject matter hereof. No subsequent agreement, representation or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to any employee, officer, agent or representative of either party, shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be bound thereby. No person is authorized to make, and by execution hereof Seller and Buyer acknowledge that no person has made, any representation, warranty, guaranty or promise except as set forth herein; and no agreement, statement, representation or promise made by any such person which is not contained herein shall be valid or binding on Seller or Buyer. (c) Successors and Assi(3ns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. (d) Time of Essence. The parties acknowledge that time is of the essence in this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Escrow company's general Escrow instructions. Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 8 (e) Remedies Not Exclusive and Waivers. No remedy conferred by any of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each and every remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The election of any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of the right to pursue other available remedies. (f) Interpretation and Construction. The parties agree that each party has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to have their counsel and real estate advisors review and revise this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the feminine and masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and "party" include corporation, partnership, firm, trust, or association where ever the context so requires. The recitals and captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement. (g) City En(fineer's Authority. The City Engineer is hereby directed and authorized to execute such other documents, including without limitation, escrow instructions and amendments thereto, certificates of acceptance, agreements for payments of lost rent, or certifications, as may be necessary or convenient to implement the terms of this Agreement. 19. Attorneys' Fees. If either party hereto incurs attorneys' fees in order to enforce, defend or interpret any of the terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement or because of a breach of this Agreement by the other party, the prevailing party, whether by suit, negotiation, arbitration or settlement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees from the other party. 20. Assi(~nment. Buyer may assign its rights under this Agreement or may designate a nominee to acquire title to the Property, provided, however, that any such assignment or designation shall not relieve Buyer of any of its obligations under this Agreement. 21. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not to be concerned with Section 8, 9, 10, and 15 hereof, and Buyer and Seller release Escrow Holder from liability or obligation as to Section 8, 9, 10, and 15 hereof. ///// ///// Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. SELLER BUYER CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation: Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 10 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of the Property 1. RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 2. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT Claim Jumper Temecula Agreement 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 22863 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 150, PAGES 51-57, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNI~ MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID POINT BEING O1~ THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD~LOCATED 55.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 38° 51' 26" WEST, 12.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCE~ THENCE NORTH 51 ° 08' 34" EAST, 165.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH AND 67.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF SAID CENTERENE OF RANCHO GALIFORNIA ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 38° 51' 26" EAST, 12.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RANCHO CAMFORNIA ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 51 ° 08' 34" WEST, 165.08 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,980.00 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0455 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS DESCRIPTION ALSO BEING SHOWN ON THE A3-rACHED 'EXHIBIT MAP' AND THEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION: BRIAN D. FOX PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 7171 REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/2003 Page 1of 1 Ma'ch 6, 2001 BY: I~ Olle~on Ck'd B~ B. P~sa EXHIBIT UAP FOR RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION _. ,, ,<':,5 L PARCEL I ~ PROPOSED R/W / I / L~ ~V/////////-////-~/-/_//Z////~_ ~_ ~,,'_ _ \ * t L~O .... ~_~ ..... ;z .......... _~' .-l"~ N~. _ P.O.B. PROPOSED CUrB · G~ m (N 51'08'34-" E) I L__ P~ ~ ~ P.U. 1~/51-57 UNE T~LE NUMBER DIRECTION OIST~CE L7 ~'51'26" ~ 12,00' L9 N ~51'26" W 12.00' LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 22863 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE mN PARCEL MAP BOOK 150, PAGES 51-57, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD LOCATED 55.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 38° 51' 26" WEST, 12.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY MNE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 38° 51' 26" WEST, 20.00 FEET ALONG SAID LINE; THENCE NORTH 51 ° 08' 34" EAST, 120.00 FEET, PARALLEL WITH AND 87.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF SAID CENTERENE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 38° 51' 26" EAST, 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51 ° 08' 34" WEST. 120.00 FEET, PARALLEL WITH AND 67.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF SAID CENTERUNE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 2,400.00 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0551 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS DESCRIPTION ALSO BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED 'EXHIBIT MAP' AND THEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION: PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 7171 REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/2003 Page1 o~1 Ma~ch 12. 2001 BY: R, Cl~d BY: B. Pisa EXHIBIT MAP FOR TEUPORARY CONSTRUCTION EAST ~' ~{ PARCEL 1 ,,'"~r~.~.~' ~ PAR, I ON ~ ~ ,~--._/ -----_____~_~ /_ _ ~'_ _ ~- P.O.B.' PROPOS~ SlI~'~.K-~' f --~-- I PROPOSED CURB & ~--/ (N ~'0~'~" £) ,..c.o ( ) DE~u~ RECO~) I~I'A PARCEL fin~ 22863 P.M. 150/51-57 Prm~ned NUMBER DIRECTION DIST/~ICE 4,,x2~0 BUSINESS P/~'K Lll N 38'51'26" W 12.00' 'Et~CUtk CA 9259O L12 N 58'51'26" W 20.00' ~ (909) L15 N 51'08'34" E 120.00' L1¢ S 38'51'26" E 20,00' i'--4o' LI§ $ 51'08'34" W 120.00' f,~'/r~' &~z,r ITEM 13 APPROVAL CitY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of fINAnCE CItY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: ~,~.William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: California Energy Commission Grant Applications - Battery Backup Systems for Traffic Signals PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst Julie Dauer, CIP Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Authorize City Staff to apply for grant funding from the California Energy Commission to padially offset the costs of installing new and existing Battery Backup Systems (BBS) for traffic signals at critical intersections. 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR GRANT FUNDS SUPPORTING THE INSTALLATION OF NEW BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR INTERSECTIONS WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR GRANT FUNDS SUPPORTING THE INSTALLATION OF EXISTING BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR INTERSECTIONS WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) TRAFFIC SIGNALS I R:~Agenda Report02\061 l\BBS.grantapp BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2001, the City Council approved the funding/rebate agreement between the City and the California Energy Commission to retrofit all traffic signal incandescent lights to Light Emitting Diodes (LED's) within the City. The installation of the LED's has significantly reduced the energy costs of the City's traffic signals and also allows intersections to operate on emergency battery backup systems. These emergency backup systems allow the City's busiest intersections to operate at total coverage during a blackout or other disruption of electrical service. To date, the City has installed eight such battery backup systems to major intersections along Rancho California Road. In addition to the LED retrofit program, the Battery Backup System (BBS) Program for Light Emitting Diode Traffic Signals was recently enacted by the Legislature of the State of California through SB 84. Also administered by the California Energy Commission, the program is intended to provide up to $10 million in grant funds to offset the material costs of installing battery backup systems incurred by cities and counties that have retrofitted traffic control signal intersections with LED's. The Public Works Department has prepared two grant application requests that we believe meet the goals of the BBS program. Our grant applications seek BBS reimbursement funds for the material costs of the eight existing battery backup systems, as well as the material costs for up to 55 new battery backup systems at critical intersections throughout the City. The installation of the battery backup systems would help to avoid traffic congestion at signalized intersections affected by energy blackouts. FISCAL IMPACT: Pursuant to BBS Program guidelines, applications are prioritized or rated in accordance with an assigned point system for each intersection and battery backup system requested. The grant program will provide up to 70% of the material costs for each existing and new battery backup system approved for grant funding. Sufficient funds are budgeted within the FY 2002-03 Public Works Operating Budget to offset the City's portion of the remaining costs to install the approved battery backup systems. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2002- 2. Resolution No. 2002- 2 R:~Agenda Report\02\061 l\BBS.grantapp RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR GRANT FUNDS SUPPORTING THE INSTALLATION OF NEW BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR INTERSECTIONS WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) TRAFFIC SIGNALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Public Resources Code Section 25403.8, the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) is authorized to provide grants to City, county or city and county governments for battery backup systems for traffic signals; WHEREAS, in order to be eligible for funding, the battery backup systems must be used in conjunction with light emitting diode traffic signals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. Approves the filing of an application with the California Energy Commission for battery backup systems operating with light emitting diode traff~c signals; Section 2. Certifies that if recommended for funding by the California Energy Commission, the City of Temecula will accept a grant up to $118,369. Section 3. Appoints William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, as authorized and empowered to execute all necessary documents to implement and carry out the purpose of this resolution to undertake and complete the energy efficiency project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11t' day of June 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 R:~Agenda Report\02\0611\BBS.grantapp (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of June 2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS 4 R:~Agenda Report\02\061 l\BBS.grantapp RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR GRANT FUNDS SUPPORTING THE INSTALLATION OF EXISTING BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR INTERSECTIONS WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) TRAFFIC SIGNALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Public Resources Code Section 25403.8, the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) is authorized to provide grants to City, county or city and county governments for battery backup systems for traffic signals; WHEREAS, in order to be eligible for funding, the battery backup systems must be used in conjunction with light emitting diode traffic signals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. Approves the filing of an application with the California Energy Commission for battery backup systems operating with light emitting diode traffic signals; Section 2. Certifies that if recommended for funding by the California Energy Commission, the City of Temecula will accept a grant up to $17,218. Section 3. Appoints William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, as authorized and empowered to execute all necessary documents to implement and carry out the purpose of this resolution to undertake and complete the energy efficiency project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 5 R:~Agenda Report\02\061 l\BBS.grantapp (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of June 2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS 6 R:~Agenda Report\02\0611 \BBS.grantapp ITEM 14 APP ROV~'t,~.,,. CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIN/rdNCE~/~/ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~ DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2002-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING TH E AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS BACKGROUND: Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, the Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Arterial Street Lighting Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City of Temecula's Parks/Lighting Services special tax approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. The purpose of the Parks/Lighting Services special tax is to provide for the ongoing operations, maintenance, and servicing of the City's public park and recreation facilities, recreational and human services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals. The Parks/Street Lighting Services special tax is levied in the same manner, at the same time as the TCSD Rates and Charges, and collected on the annual property tax bills for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. The maximum annual tax has been established at $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit; $55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non- residential improved property, $148.88 per acre of golf course property, and $37.22 per acre for agricultural uses. For Fiscal Year 2002-2003, the total operating budget for parks, recreation, medians, and arterial street lighting services is $6,344,770. rR:\smithb'C, ssessmems\02-03 Staff Spec Tax Council doc June 11, 2002 The total possible revenue received at the current rate from all taxable parcels within the City for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 is $2,689,333.00. The difference in operating costs over levy revenue is offset by fund balance transfers, recreational revenues and user fees, and REST Program contributions. Pursuant to City Ordinance 96-21, the City Council is also empowered to establish the amount of the tax levy each fiscal year, approved by the voters, not to exceed the maximum tax rates identified above. As a result, it is recommended that the amounts to be levied as a special tax for Fiscal Year 2002-2003, be less than the maximum amounts established by City Ordinance No. 96-21, in the following manner: $ 63.44 per single family residential dwelling unit $ 47.58 per multi-family residential dwelling unit $126.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone $ 253.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone $ 380.64 per acre of non-residential improved property $126.88 per acre of golf course property $ 31.72 per acre of agricultural property In keeping with the City Council's continued practice of trying to reduce fees to our property owners whenever possible, and even though it is allowable for the City Council to approve this year's Special Tax at the maximum rate, the above recommended Special Tax is a $11.00 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) savings from the maximum rate of $74.44 per EDU. In addition, this will be the eighth consecutive year that the Revenue Excess Sharing in Temecula (REST) program has contributed to the overall reduction in the rates for parks, recreation, and street lighting services. FISCAL IMPACT: The Special Tax levy at the proposed rates will generate $2,689,333.00. The remaining funds necessary to complete the Parks/Lighting Services budget will be derived from fund balance, recreation revenue, user fees, and general fund contributions. ATDACHMENTS: 1. Resolution to Levy Special Tax. rR:\smithb~Assessments\02-03 Staff Spec Tax Council,doc June 11, 2002 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING TH E AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, the City Council adopted, and the voters of the City of Temecula approved, Ordinance No. 96-21, levying and assessing a special tax on each parcel of property in the City of Temecula for each fiscal year, commencing with fiscal year 1997-98. Section 2. The maximum amount of said special tax for each fiscal year as established by Ordinance No. 96-21 is $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-residential improved property, $148.88 per acre of golf course property, and $37.22 per acre for agricultural uses. Section 3. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21 the City Council is empowered to establish the amounts of the special tax levy annually each fiscal year, in amounts not to exceed the maximum amounts specified in Section 2 of this Resolution, as is required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in the Ordinance. Section 4. The City Council hereby determines that the following amounts are required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in Ordinance No. 96-21, and hereby establishes the following amounts to be levied as a special tax for fiscal year 2002-2003, which amounts are less than the maximum amounts established by Ordinance No. 96-21 and approved by' voters: $ 63.44 per single-family residentiaJ dwelling unit $ 47.56 ~er multi-family residential dwelling unit $126.88 ~er acre of vacant property in a residential zone $253.76 )er acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone $380.64 ~er acre of non-residential improved property $126.88 ~er acre of golf course property $ 31.72 )er acre of agricultural property Section 5. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner, on the same dates, and shall be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Temecula. Said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of Temecula by the persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of R:~smithb~Assessments\02-03 Reso for Special Tax.doc 06/12/01 property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to the special tax, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. Section 6. The revenue raised by the special tax shall be placed in a special fund to be used only for the purposes of financing recreational and human services programs, and the operation, maintenance, and servicing of public parks and recreational facilities, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith. Section 7'. The special tax shall not be imposed upon a federal or state governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that is exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the Constitution or any paramount law. Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 9, 2002, the propertytax roll with the special tax enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of such special tax as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor. Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax challenges or questions the levy of the special tax against such property owner's property, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 2, 2002, pursuant to procedures established by the City. Section 10. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment of the special tax for fiscal year 2002-2003 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 2, 2002, pursuant to procedures established by the City, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 11. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. The City Council does hereby declare that it wou~d have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions hereof are declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AN D ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11 th day of June 2002. Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2002- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 11th day of June 2002, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS ITEM 15 APPROVAL ClTY ATTORNEY DIR.OFFINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~ DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Fiscal Years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06 PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant Funds for Fiscal Years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06 DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in which funding is allocated to the City annually through the Economic Development Agency of Riverside County. The CDBG funds may be used for the support of activities that provide affordable housing and suitable living environments and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of Iow and moderate income. This is the standard agreement similar to the one the City entered into in 1999. CDBG regulations require counties to rs-qualify as an Urban County under the CDBG program every three years, therefore, the execution of this agreement is necessary to include the City as a participating unit in the County's CDBG program. Participation in the Urban County program makes the City eligible for the same kind of CDBG funding it has received in the previous years. It is estimated that CDBG funding levels administered by the county during this cooperation agreement will be between $350,000 and $400,000 annually. The City's CDBG funding level for fiscal year 2002-03 is $352,000 and is programmed to fund eight (8) public service organizations and two (2) City capital improvement construction project. The most recent census data indicated the City's population is over 50,000 however, at this time it is not financially prudent to pursue submitting an application for entitlement which would allow the City to receive funding directly from HUD. This situation has been and will continue to be monitored closely as we have been in discussion with the HUD Pacific Regional Office. The HUD Pacific Regional Office provided funding data to the City in order to do a comparison with the County funding level. The County funding level was $38,000 mots than the estimated direct funding from HUD. Next fiscal year the City will request that HUD prepare funding data based on newer population projections in a continuing effod to estimate the feasibility of entitlement status. FISCAL IMPACT: The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have no impact on the City, other than staff time needed to administer program requirements. It is projected that the City will receive $38,000 more annually by continuing with the County EDA as opposed to converting to entitlement status. Attachment: CDBG Cooperation Agreement Urban County Qualification 2003-2005 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CA Riverside County Economic Development Agency 3525 14th Street Riverside, CA 92501 FAX: 909-955-6686 Attn: Suzanne Holland __ This City elects to participate in the Urban County (Riverside County) for the Community Development Program for Federal Fiscal Years 2003-2005. Signed: City Manager This City elects NOT to participate in the Urban County (Riverside County) for the Community Development Program for Federal Fiscal Years 2003-2005. Electing not to participate, I will also notify: HUD Region IX- Los Angeles Office, AT&T Center, 611 W. 6th St., Los Angeles, CA 90017 Signed: City Manager 1 COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS 2 FOR FISCAL YEARS 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06 3 4 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of Califomia, hereinafter referred to as 5 "COUNTY", and City of Temecula , an incorporated municipality within the geographical 6 boundaries of the COUNTY, hereinafter refer?ed to as "CITY", mutually agree as follows: 7 WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended 8 (Public Law 93-383), hereinafter called "ACT" provides that Community Development Block 9 Grant, hereinafter referred to as "CDBG", funds may be used for the support of activities that 10 provide decent housing and suitable living environments and expanded economic opportunities 11 principally for persons of low and moderate income; and 12 WHEREAS, the HOME program authorized by the HOME Investment Partnerships Act 13 (HOME) was enacted as Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, has as its 14 purposes: to expand the supply of decent, affordable housing for low and very-low income 15 families with emphasis on rental housing; build State and local capacity to carry out affordable 16 housing programs, and provide for coordinated assistance to participants in the development of 17 affordable Iow-income housing; and 18 WHEREAS, CDBG regulations require counties to re-qualify as an Urban County under 19 the CDBG program every three years; and 20 WHEREAS, the execution of this Agreement is necessary to include CITY as a 21 participating unit of general government under COUNTY's Urban County CDBG and HOME 22 program. 23 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and the 24 mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties agree as follows: 25 1. GENERAL. 26 This Agreement gives COUNTY authority to undertake or assist in undertaking 27 activities for Fiscal Years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, which will be funded from the CDBG 28 program, the HOME Investment Parmership program, and from any program income generated Page 1 of I 1 from the expenditure of such funds. COUNTY and CITY agree to cooperate to undertake or 2 assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, 3 specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing. COUNTY is qualified as an "Urban 4 County" under the ACT. CITY, by executing this Agreement, hereby gives notice of its election 5 to participate in an Urban County Community Development Block Grant program, hereinafter 6 referred to as "CDBG programs". 7 By executing this Agreement, CITY understands that it may not apply for grants 8 fi'om appropriations under the Small Cities or State CDBG Programs for fiscal years during the 9 period in which it participates in the Urban County's CDBG program and that CITY may 10 participate in a HOME program only through the Urban County not a consortium. 11 2. TERM. 12 The term of this Agreement shall be for not less than a period of three (3) years 13 commencing on July 1, 2003 and extending through the federal fiscal years 2005-2006, which 14 ends June 30, 2006, unless an earlier date of termination is fixed by U.S. Department of Housing 15 and Urban Development, hereinafter called HUD, pursuant to ACT. The terms of this 16 Agreement shall remain in effect until the CDBG (and HOME, where applicable) funds and 17 program income received with respect to activities carded out during the three-year qualification 18 period are expended and the funded activities completed, and that the COUNTY nor the CITY 19 may terminate or withdraw from the cooperation Agreement while it remains in effect. 20 3. PREPARATION OF FEDERALLY REOUIRED FUNDING 21 APPLICATIONS. ' 22 COUNTY, by and through its Economic Development Agency, subject to 23 approval of COUNTY's Board of Supervisor's, shall be responsible for preparing and submitting 24 to HUD, in a timely manner those reports and statements required by the ACT and the federal 25 regulations promulgated by HUD to secure entitlement grant funding under the CDBG and 26 HOME program. This duty shall include the preparation and processing of COUNTY Housing, 27 Community and Economic Development Needs Identification Report, Citizen Participation Plan, 28 the County Consolidated Plan, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report and Page 2 of 2 1 other related programs which satisfy the application requirements of ACT and its regulations. 2 4. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND 3 OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. 4 (a) COUNTY and CITY will comply with the applicable provisions of the 5 ACT and those federal regulations promulgated by HUD pursuant thereto, as the same currently 6 exists or may hereafter be amended. The COUNTY and CITY will take all actions necessary to 7 assure compliance with COUNTY's certifications required by Section 104 (b) of Title I 0fACT. 8 COUNTY and CITY will comply with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act 9 of 1969, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, and 10 Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations part 570; the Fair Housing Act; Cranston-Gonzales 11 National Affordable housing Act (Public Law 101-625); Section 109 Title I of the Housing and 12 Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.§5309); Executive Order 11063, as amended 13 by Executive Order 12259; Executive Order 11988; the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 14 Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.§4630, et. seq.) and other federal or state 15 statute or regulation that is applicable to the use of CDBG or HOME Investment Parmerships 16 Act (enacted as Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990) funds. 17 (b) CITY agrees that CDBG funding for activities in or in support of CITY 18 are prohibited if CITY does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or 19 impedes COUNTY actions to comply with its fair housing certification. 20 (c) CITY and COUNTY shall meet the citizen participation requirements of 21 24 CFR 570.301 and provide citizens with: 22 1. The estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to be used 23 for activities that will benefit persons of low and moderate income; and 24 2. A plan for minimizing displacement of persons as a result of 25 activities assisted with CDBG funds and to assist persons actually displaced as a result of such 26 activities. 27 3. A plan that provides for and encourages citizen participation, with 28 particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income who are residents of Page 3 of 3 I slum and blighted areas and of areas in which funds are proposed to be used, and provides for 2 participation of residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods; 3 4. Reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information and 4 records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the 5 Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under the ACT; 6 5. Provides for public meetings to obtain citizen views and to respond 7 to proposals and questions at all stages of the community development program, including at 8 least the development of needs, the review of proposed activities and review of program 9 performance, which meetings shall be held after adequate notice, at times and locations 10 convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries, and witl/accommodation for the handicapped; 11 (d) CITY shall develop a community development plan, for the period of this 12 Agreement, that identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short 13 and long-term community development objectives. 14 (e) CITY certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that: 15 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by 16 or on behalf of the CITY, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or 17 employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an 18 employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the 19 making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any 20 cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of 21 any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. 22 2. If any funds other than Federally appropriated funds have been 23 paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or 24 employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an 25 employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or 26 cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit standard Form-LLL, 27 "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions. 28 3. The CITY shall require that the language of this certification be Page 4 of 4 1 included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants 2 and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall 3 certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon 4 which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. 5 (f) In accordance with Section 519 Public Law 101-144, (the 1990 HUD 6 Appropriations Act), the CITY certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing a policy prohibiting 7 the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any 8 individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations, and that it has adopted and is 9 enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a 10 facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights.demonstrations within its 11 jurisdiction. 12 5. COMPLIANCE WITH POLICY AND PROGRAM OBJECTIVES. 13 Policy and program objectives as required by applicable federal regulations for 14 the efficient administration of the CDBG program will be adopted by COUNTY's Board of 15 Supervisors, and COUNTY and CITY will adhere to said policy and program objectives. 16 6. OTHER AGREEMENTS. 17 Pursuant to federal regulations at 24 CFR 570.501(b), CITY is subject to the same 18 requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement of a written agreement set 19 forth in federal regulations at 24 CFR 570.503. For each fiscal year during the term of this 20 Agreement, COUNTY and CITY shall enter into a Supplemental Agreement that will have a 21. term coinciding with a Program Year and enumerate the project(s) CITY will implement with its 22 entitlement funds. Said Supplemental Agreement' will set forth the time schedule for completion 23 of said project(s) and any funding sources, in addition to entitlement funds, that will be used in 24 completing the project(s). If substantial compliance with the completion schedule, due to 25 unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances, cannot be met by CITY, the schedule for the 26 project(s) may be extended. If substantial progress toward drawdown of funds is not made 27 during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, the entitlement funds associated with the 28 project(s) may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after appropriate notice is given CITY. Page 5 of 5 1 COUNTY's decision not to extend the completion schedule associated with the project(s) or to 2 reprogram the entitlement funds associated with the project(s) will not excuse CITY from 3 complying with terms of this Agreement. 4 7. DETERMiNATION OF PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED AND 5 DISTRIBUTION OF ENTITLEMENT FUNDS: 6 CITY will, prior to the commencement of a Program Year, designate those 7 projects that it desires to implement with its entitlement funds, said designation to comply with 8 statutory and regulatory provisions governing citizen's participation. Said designation is to be 9 reviewed by the COUNTY's Economic Development Agency to determine that the project is 10 eligible under federal regulations for funding and inclusion in the annual Consolidated Plan's 11 Action Plan and consistent with both federal and COUNTY policy governing use of Community 12 Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. 13 COUNTY's Board of Supervisors will, consistent with Paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 14 of this Agreement, determine the distribution and disposition of all CDBG funds received by 15 COUNTY pursuant to the Act. 16 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MANUAL. 17 CITY warrants that those officers, employees and agents retained by it and 18 responsible for implementing those projects ftmded by CDBG funds have received, reviewed and 19 will follow the Community Development Block Grant Manual that has been prepared by 20 COUNTY and, by this reference, said Manual is incorporated herein and made a part hereof. 21 9. REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED OR PUBLIC FACILITY 22 CONSTRUCTED WITH CDBG FLrNDS. 23 When CDBG funds are used, in whole or in part by CITY to acquire real property 24 or to construct a public facility, CITY will comply with the National Environmental Policy Act 25 of 1969 (42 U.S.C. {}{}4321, et seq.), the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. 26 Resources Code §§21000, et seq.), the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property 27 Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4630, et seq.), California Government Code 28 Sections 7260 et seq., as those Acts may be amended from time to time and any federal or state Page 6 of 6 1 regulations issued to implement the aforementioned laws. 2 In addition, the following is to occur: 3 (a) Title to the real property shall vest in CITY; 4 (b) The real property will be held by or the constructed facility will be 5 maintained by the CITY until five years after the date that the CITY is no longer participating 6 with the County in the CDBG entitlement program and is no longer considered by HUD to be a 7 part of the Urban County CDBG program. 8 (c) While held by CITY, the real property or the constructed facility is to be 9 used exclusively for the purpose for which acquisition or construction was originally approved 10 by COUNTY; 11 (d) CITY shall provide timely notice to COUNTY of any action which would 12 result in a modification or change in the use of the real property purchased or improved, in whole 13 or in part with CDBG or HOME funds from that planned at the time of acquisition or 14 improvement, including disposition. 15 (e) CITY shall provide timely notice to citizens and opportunity to comment 16 on any proposed modification or change; 17 (f) Written approval from COUNTY must be secured if the property or the 18 facility is to be put to an alternate use that is or is not cOnsistent with federal regulations 19 governing CDBG funds; 20 (g) Should CITY desire during the five (5) year period to use the real property 21 or the constructed facility for a purpose not consistent with applicable federal regulations 22 governing CDBG funds or to sell the real property or facility, then: 23 (1) If CITY desires to retain title, it will have to reimburse either 24 COUNTY or the federal government an amount that represents the percentage of current fair 25 market value that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds comprised monies paid to 26 initially acqUire the property or construct the facility; or 27 (2) If CITY sells the property or facility or is required to sell the property 28 or facility, CITY is to reimburse either the COUNTY of the federal govermnent an amount that Page 7 of 7 1 represents the percentage of proceeds realized by the sale that is identical to the percentage that 2 CDBG funds comprised monies paid to initially acquire the property or construct the facility. 3 This percentage amount will be calculated after deducting all actual and reasonable cost of sale 4 t~om the sale proceeds. 5 10. DISPOSITION OF INCOME GENERATED BY THE EXPENDITURE OF 6 CDBG FUNDS. 7 CITY shall inform COUNTY of any income generated by the expenditure of 8 CDBG funds received by CITY from COUNTY. CITY may not retain any program income so 9 generated. Any and all program income shall be returned to the County and may only be used 10 for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements, including all requirements for 11 citizen participation. 12 COUNTY has the responsibility for monitoring and reporting to HUD on the use 13 of any such program income, thereby requiring appropriate record keeping and reporting by 14 CITY as may be needed and requested by COUNTY. 15 11. TERMINATION. 1.6 This Agreement may not be terminated by either CITY or COUNTY, nor may the 17 CITY or COUNTY withdraw from this Agreement or any of the terms of this Agreement. 18 12. FORMER AGREEMENTS UTILIZING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 19 BLOCK GRANT FUNDS BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY. 20 All agreements between CITY and COUNTY regarding the use of CDBG funds 21 for fiscal years 1975-76 through 2002-2003 and any Suppldmental Agreements thereunder, shall 22 remain in full force and effect. If the language of this Agreement is in conflict or inconsistent 23 with the terms of any prior said agreements between CITY and COUNTY, the language of this 24 Agreement will be controlling. 25 13. INDEMNIFICATION' 26 CITY agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless COUNTY and its 27 authorized officers, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all claims,' actions, losses, 28 damages, and/or liability arising from CITY acts, errom or omissirms and for any costs or Page 8 of 8 1 expenses incurred by COUNTY on account of any claim therefore, except where such 2 indemnifications is prohibited by law. CITY shall promptly notify COUNTY in writing of the 3 occurrence of any such claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability. 4 CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY against any liability, claims, 5 losses, demands, and actions incurred by COUNTY as a result of the determination by HUD or 6 its successor that activities undertaken by CITY under the program(s) fail to comply with any 7 laws, regulations or policies applicable thereto or that any funds billed by and disbursed to CITY 8 under this Agreement were improperly expended. 9 10 Dated: ,2002 11 ATTEST: 12 13 GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 14 15 16 17 By: By: 18 Deputy Chairman, Board of Supervisors 19 CITY OF TEMECULA 20 ATTEST: Shawn Nelson 21 City Manager 22 ~4PPROVED AS TO FORM 23 24 By: By: '25 Susan W. Jones, CMC Peter M. Thorson 26 City Clerk City Attorney 27 Cooperation Agreement For Community Developmen~ Block Grant Funds 2001,2002,2003 28 Page 9 of 9 1 COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFICATION 2 The Office of the County Counsel hereby certifies that the terms and provisions of this 3 Agreement are fully authorized under state and local law and that the Agreement provides full 4 legal authority for the COUNTY to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community 5 development and housing assistance activities specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted 6 housing. 7 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN 8 County Counsel 9 10 By: 11 Deputy 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 10 oflO ITEM 16 APPROV/~,,~j CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Library Grant Application PREPARED BY: ~Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE TEMECULA PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT BUDGET, LOCAL FUNDING COMMITMENT, AND SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS AS REQUIRED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENT AND LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000 2. Approve the grant application for the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 and authorize staff to submit the application to the Bond Act Board. DISCUSSION: In March 2000, California voters approved a statewide ballot measure entitled Proposition 14-California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Act of 2000. This competitive statewide grant program will provide 65% ofall eligible construction related expenses for new libraries. In January 2002, the final grant regulations were approved by the State and available to the public. The first cycle of applications is due on June 14, 2002. Staff has been working with the Riverside County Library staff, the Temecula Valley Unified School District (District), the architect, a grant writer and other consultants to complete the grant application and the other required documents. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors heard and considered the Joint Use Cooperative Agreement among the District, County and City earlier today. Those library projects demonstrating a joint use with a public school district will be considered as R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS\Iibrarygrant app & reso-cc, doc first priority projects when the applications are evaluated. Both the District and City previously approved the Agreement. The Board of Supervisors also heard and considered the Grant Application and an Operating Resolution, both of which are required for inclusion in the grant application by the Bond Act. Finally, the City of Temecula as the applicant must consider and approve the Grant Application and adopt a Resolution certifying the project budget, committing to the local matching funds required to complete the project and pledging to operate the facility as a public library for a period of 40 years. The City must commit to fund the ineligible expenses associated with the project and to cover any pledged donations that may not be available from private sources at the time the funding takes place. Adoption of the Resolution and approval of the grant application are the final steps necessary to finalize the City's grant application for the Temecula Public Library. The complete package, with all supporting documents, will be delivered to the California Public Library Construction and Renovation Board prior to the first cycle deadline. FISCAL IMPACT: The grant application is seeking $8,518,977 as the 65% State Bond Act matching funds of eligible expenses for the Temecula Public Library project. The City's adjusted local 35% match is $3,946,641; of this amount, the Riverside County Library System has pledged $1,000,000 for the purchase of collections and the Friends of the Temecula Library has pledged $100,000 towards completion of the project. The supplemental costs in the amount of $1,835,316 are those costs that are ineligible for state matching funds and must be paid through other funding. The grant application provides a means to recover land costs associated with this project, making the adjusted Bond Act match $8,518,977. The City has budgeted $4,872,000 from Development Impact Fees - Library and Capital Project Reserves for this project. The City has also budgeted the pledged funds from Riverside County and the Friends of the Temecula Library in the combined amount of $1,100,000. As part of the Resolution, the City commits to fund any pledged donations that may not become available from private sources. Attachments: Resolution Library Grant Application R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS~IibraW grant app & reso-cc.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE TEMECULA PUBLIC LIBRARY PROJECT BUDGET, LOCAL FUNDING COMMITMENT, AND SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDS AS REQUIRED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENT AND LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine and declare that: a. The California voters passed the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 on March 7, 2000, which provides two-thirds funding of eligible costs of construction of new and renovated libraries in the State of California. b. Library services for the City of Temecula (City) are currently provided at a branch facility located at the City's northern boundary by the County of Riverside. c. The City has completed a Community Library Needs Assessment, which has concluded that the residents of the City, students of the Temecula Valley Unified School District and surrounding community would greatly benefit from a new and larger library facility that would be more centrally located and offer additional programs and hours of service. d. The City has acquired an adequate site located at or about the center of the City for a library site. e. The City has completed the conceptual design of a 34,000 square foot library facility and the Library Project Budget ("Budget"). f. The City commits to provide local matching funds in the amount of $4,587,141 as identified in the Budget, as required by Education Code section 19995 (a). The Budget includes and identifies an amount of $640,500 to be credited to local matching funds pursuant to Education Code section 19995 (c) and (d). g. The City commits to provide supplemental funds in the amount of $1,835,316 necessary to complete the project at the level stated in the Budget pursuant to section 20436 (e). Of this amount, $1,000,000 has been committed by the County of Riverside and $100,000 has been committed by the Friends of the Temecula Library. h. The City confirms the supplemental funds specified in the Budget in the amount of $100,000 to be provided by donation from the Friends of the Temecula Library (Friends) non-profit organization and further attests that the City will provide these funds should the Friends not be able to meet the obligation at the time of construction. i. The City certifies the project budget contained in the Library Project Budget section contained in the Application Form and supporting documents, with an eligible funding amount of $13,106,118 and an ineligible funding amount of $1,835,316. j. The City confirms that the adjusted local matching and supplemental funds will be available and appropriated to meet the cash flow requirements for the library project. k. The City confirms the accuracy and truthfulness of all information submitted in the Application Form and the required supporting documents. I. The City commits that the facility shall be dedicated to public library direct service use for a period of 40 years following completion of the project, regardless of any operating agreements the City may have with other jurisdictions or parties. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of ,2002. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Pro-Tem ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of ,2002 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Section 20440, Appendix 1 A PPLICA TION FORM CALIFORNIA READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENT AND PUBLIC LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000 FUNDS Administered by the California State Library, Office of Library Construction The applicant local jurisdiction, pursuant to the Education Coda, Title l, Division l, Part tt, Chapter 12, Articles 1-3, sections lgggS.2OOfl and Title 5, Division 2, Chapter 3, sections 20430-20444 of the California Coda of Regulations, hereby makes application for a state matching grant for the construction or remodeling of the public fibrary facility described herein and in all supporting documents: APPLICATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS: Limitcommentsthroughouttheentirefon~tothespaceprovidedunlessotherwisestated. sing~espaceresp~nses~imitingtypesizet~n~sma~erthan~lp~intsifusingac~mputer~r12pitch(e~ite)ifatypewriter is used. Attachmentssha~~n~tbeacceptedun~essrequiredbyregu~ati~n~rca~~edf~rintheapp~icati~nf~rrn~ ApplicantsshallsubmitacompletedApplicationFormandsixadditionalcopiesoftheform. (See section 20440 for complete application submittal requirements) -.. .... · , ........................................... 1. Official Name of Project: > Temecula Public Library 2. Type of Applicant Jurisdiction: > ~Ch~konoonly) I City: ~ County: © City/County: © District: © I 3. Grant Applicant Name: · City of Temecula Legal name of jurisdiction that will own building (For multipurpose projects, list the legal name of the jurisdictions that will own the public library pordon of the multipurpose building.) 4. Authorized Official of the Applicant Jurisdiction: · Ron Roberts Mayor, Chairperson of Board of Supervisors, Head of Special District, authorized to sign the application Title: · Mayor Phone: · (909)506-5100 E-mail: · rroberts~.citvofternecula.or<~ Address: · City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive; P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 5. Project Coordinator: · Phyllis Ruse Name of Individual who wilt ha va administrative control over the project for the applicant local jurisdiction Title: · Deputy Director of the Community Services Department Phone: · (909) 694-6480 E-mail: · rusep~.cityoftemecula.oro Address: > City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 6. Alternate Project Contact Person: > Aaron Adams ff the project coordinator is unavailable, the contact person shall be authorized to act in the capacity of the project coordinator. Title: · Senior Management Analyst Phone: · (909) 506-5100 E-mail: · adamsa~citvoftemecula.orc; Address: · City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 7, Head of Planning Department: ·Debbie Ubnoske (For the appllcant jurisdicllon, if applicable. Special Dlst~fcts are exempt.) Title: · Director of Planning Phone: · (909) 694-6400 E-mail: · Ubnoskds~cit¥oftemecula.om Address: · City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 8. Head of Public Works or General Services Department: · William Hughes ff Applicable: Head of Public Works or General San, ices Department for the applicant jurisdiction. Special Districts are exempl. Title: · Director of Public Works Phone: · (909) 694-6411 E-mail: · huc;hesb~.citvoftemecula.om Address: · City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 9, Operating Library Jurisdiction: · Riverside County Library System Legal name of library that will operate the public library. 10, Library Director Name: > Gary Christmas Public library director for the library jurisdiction that will operate the public library. Title: · County Librarian Phone: · (909) 955-1111 E-mail: · qchristmas~.rceo.or(~ Address: · Riverside County Library System, 4080 Lemon St., 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3651 11, Alternate Library Contact Person: · Mark Smith if the library director is unavailable, the contact person shall be authorized to act in the capacity of the library director. Title: · Deputy Administrator Phone: · (909) 369-3003 Ext. 27 E-mail: · marks~lssi.corn Address: · Riverside County Library System, 3392-A Durahart Street Riverside, CA 92507 12. Library Building Program Consultant: ·Linda Demmers (If applicable) Title: · Library Consultant Phone: · 323-668-0404 E-mail: · xlibds~earthlink.net Address: > 2414 Chislehurst Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90027 13. Technology Planning Consultant > Eon Zawadzki (If applicable) Title: · Consultant Phone: · 949-221-0432 E-mail: · rzawadzki~.konsortum l.com Address: · Konsortum 1, 17891 Skye Park Circle#B Irvine, CA 92614 14. Project Architect: · James Wirick License # · C15598 Providing construction budget estimate and/or conceptual plans. Titte: · Principal Phone:· (949)261-1001 E-mail: · iwirick~lpainc.com Address: · LPA 17848 Sky Park Circle, Irvine, CA 92614 18. Project Manager: · Amer Attar (if applicable) Title: · Senior Engineer Phone:· (909)694-6411 E-mai[: · attara~citvoftemecula.om Address: · City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 16. Construction Manager: · Unknown at this time (if applicable) Title: · Phone: · E-mail: · Address: · 17. Construction Cost Estimator: · John E. Mauk (if applicable) Title: · Estimating Manager Phone: · 949-476-2094 E-mail: · imauk~ocmi.com Address: · O'Connor Construction, 19600 Fairchild ~00 Irvine, CA 92612 18. Hazardous Materials Consultant: · N/A (if applicable) Title: > Phone: · E-mail: · Address: 19. Project Interior Designer: · Chris Lentz (if applicable) Title: · Associate Phone:· (949)261-1101 E-mai~: · ctentz~leainc.com Address: · LPA, 17848 Sky Park Circle, Irvine, CA 92614 TYPE OF PROJECT New Public Library Building Gross Total Project S(luare Footacle 1. Construction of a New Public Library Building · 34,000 SF 2. Conversion of an Existing Building into a New Public Library Building · 0 SF 3. Conversion and Expansion of an Existing Building into a New Public Library · SF (Include both new & remodeled square footage.) Gross Sauare Footacle · Remodeling: · 0 SF · Expansion: · 0 SF Priority: [] First Priority "Joint Use" [] Co-Location Joint Use [] Joint Venture Joint Use [] Computer Center [] Shared Electronic/Telecommunications [] Family Literacy Center [] Subject Specialty Center [] Homework Center [] Career Center [] Other similar collaborative library services with direct benefit to K-12 students Specify: · [] Second Prioritv "All Others" Existing Public Library Building Gross Total Project S~uare Footaqe 4. Remodeling an Existing Public Library Building · 0 SF 5. Remodeling and Expansion of an Existing Public Library Building · SF (include both new & remodeled square footage.) Gross Square Foota.qe · Remodeling: · 0 SF ,.~ Expansion: · 0 SF [] First Priority A public library project in the attendance area of a public school that has inadequate infrastructure to support access to computers and other educational technology. "Inadequate infrastructure" is defined as an incoming telecommunication connection to a school building of equal to or less than 512 thousand bits per second (512K bps) Name of Public School: · [] Second Priority "All Others" Field Act Applicability (Joint use projects only) to the Field Act? ·,I YES O NO (~ I 6. Is the project subject 4 Multipurpose Buildings (Multipurpose Building Projects Only) Is the project a Multipurpose Building? · I YES O NO (A multipurpose building is s multi, occupant facility, part of which is a public library and part of which ia used for other purposes.) Types of Multipurpose Building Uses & Square Footage Allocations I Space Use SQ FT % I 1. Dedicated to Public Library Use · SF 0 (Including Pubfic Library / School Ubrary Uss, if Joint Usa Project) Line f SF divided by (Line 1 SF + Line 3 SF) 2. Dedicated to "Other" Uses SQ FT A. Specify · SF B. Specify · SF C, Specify · SF D, Specify · SF E. Specify · SF F. Specify · SF G. Specify · SF H. Specify · SF 3. Subtotal: Dedicated to "Other" Uses · 0 SF 0 Add Lines 2A SF Line 3 $F divided by thru 2H SF (Line 1 SF + Line 3 SF) 4. Common Areas~ 5. Subtotal: Total of Common Areas~ · SF Must equal LIne $ SF + Line ? SI= SQ 6. Public Library Pro Rata Share of Common Areas~ · 0 SF LlneSSFx % ln LIne f 7. "Other" Uses Pro Rata Share of Common Areas~ > 0 SF Llne $ $F x % in LIne 3 8, TOTAL MULTIPURPOSE BUILDING SOUARE FOOTAGE · 0 SF Add Lines fSF, S SF, S 5 SF 9. SF ATTRIBUTABLE TO PUBLIC LIBRARY USE · 0 SF Line 'Comrnon Araas ara th~seareas~f~rnu~ti.~ccupantbugdthgthataresharadbyati~ccupants~such~s~~bbies~vestibu~es~mechanica~r~~ms~rastr~~ms~cus~dia~ areas, delivery, shipping and raceivlng areas, loading d~cks, kitchenettes, auditorfums, meeting rooms, conference rooms, and storage areas that ara used by all parties ora multipurpose building. 5 PLANNING INFORMATION IPopulation Growth When providing the 1980, 2000, and 2020 population figures below, the applicant shall count only those residents: (a) Within the official boundaries of the applicant jurisdiction, and (b) Within the service area of the proposed project, but (c) Exclude all people living within the boundaries of other special district, county, or city public library service areas, for which there is no public library service contract with the applicant. All Projects: I. Public library project's service area fgso population: · 1,783 2. Source: · California Department of Finance 3. Population Percentage Change from lg80 to 2000: · 3137% 4. Public library project's service area 2000 population: · 57,716 5. Source: · U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 6. Population Percentage Change from 2000 to 2020: · 43% 7. Public library project's service area 2020 population: · 82,536 8. Source: · Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Joint Use Projects (Both Co-location & Joint Venture Projects): 9. Project's public school attendance area(s) 1980 student population: · 500 10. Source: · Temecula Valley Unified School District 11. Population Percentage Change from f980 to 2000: · 3700% 12. Project's public school attendance area(s) 2000 student population: · 19,000 t3. Source: · Temecula Valley Unified School District 14. Population Percentage Change from 2000 to 2020: · 100% 15. Project's public school attendance area(s) 2020 student population: · 38,000 16. Source: · Temecula Valley Unified School District IExisting Library Facility Square Footage Existing Public Library: 1. Thecurrentgrosssquarefootageoftheexisting public library(s) being replaced is: > 0 SF ff no existing public library facility, enter "0." Existing School Library: (Co-located Projects Only) 2. The curmnt gross square footage of the existing school library(s) being replaced is: > 0 SF ff no existing school library facility, enter "0." ILibrary Facilities Master Plan Describe the relationship of the proposed project to other existing or planned library facilities for the jurisdiction. The proposed Temecula Public Library is an essential part of the County Library's plan to provide library services in a rapidly growing area. This section outlines how the County Library plans for growth and the role of the proposed Temecula Public Library in that plan. Riverside County has adopted the County of Riverside Comprehensive Mitigation Fee Review ("Report"), which presents the rationale for the construction of new libraries based on population growth, identifies locations for the new public facilities, and describes the purpose and use of the assessed mitigation fee. The facilities list, which is part of the Report, identifies the locations where buildings and collections need to be expanded, constructed or purchased to meet increased library demand. A 16,000 square foot County branch library located within the City boundary currently serves the City of Temecula. An additional 69,200 square feet of library facilities is distributed throughout the Western Riverside County region. However, these other branch libraries are at some distance from Temecula, making it difficult for many Temecula library patrons to access needed library services. Riverside County is growing rapidly. The Report forecasts the construction of an additional 135,347 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU's) in Western Riverside County by the year 2010. Much of that growth is anticipated to occur in or near Temecula. The Report further predicts that the future residents who will move to the area will generate the need for an additional 75,000 square feet of library facilities. The new library in the City of Temecula is therefore a fundamental part of the County Library's plan to meet the additional demand for library facilities and services. Upon incorporation in December 1989, the City of Temecula continued to collect library mitigation fees similar to those collected by the County. In 1997, the City conducted a Development Impact Fee study {DIF) and adopted a new fee. The new fee is designed to mitigate the impact of City residential growth and development on library facilities and services. The fee is now set at a level which maintains current services. There is an annual inflation factor that is applied to all DIF components, including Library Facilities, to help ensure that the fees charged for development do not fall below the cost of providing appropriate library facilities and services. The funds collected by the City for the DIF - Library Facilities component are currently budgeted as part of the City's matching funds towards the construction of the Temecula Public Library. Currently, there is one small branch of the County Library near the border of Temecula and Murrieta. It is the busiest library in the County system, and handles the reference support function for the entire region. Woefully undersized for its purpose, it nevertheless provides the principal library service for the area. The proposed Temecula Public Library does not replace but rather augments the services provided by the smaller branch, and together, the two facilities will greatly advance the County Library's goal of providing adequate facilities in this region of the County. Age of the Existing Library Facility See Definition of "Existing Public Library," section 20430. All Projects 1. When was the existing public library building(s) that will be replaced or improved built? > N/A Year If no existing public library facility, enter "N lA If proposed project will replace more than one building, list the oldest of the buildings. Co-Located Joint Use Proiects Only In addition to the information listed above: 2. When was the existing school library building(s) that will be replaced or improved built? > N/A ~ Year If no existing school library facility, enter "N / A " If proposed project will replace more than one building, list the oldest of the buildings. ICondition of the Existing Library Facility I See Definition of "Existing Public Library," section 20430. All Projects 3. When was the most recent structural~ renovation or expansion of the existing public library building(s) that is to be replaced or improved by the proposed project? > N/A Year find existing public library facility, enter "N / A " If proposed project will replace more than one building, list the oldest of the buildings. Co-Located Proiects Only In addition to the information listed above: 4. When was the most recent structural~ renovation or expansion of the existing school library building(s) that is to be replaced or improved by the proposed project? > N/A Year ff no existing school library facility, enter "N / A" If proposed project will replace more than one building, list the oldest of the buildings. ~ Pertaining to the Ioad bearing elements of the building !,N b.R,,MA' 'iON Ownership and Availability Site 1. Is the library site currently owned by the applicant? Yes (~ No O 2. Will the library site be owned by the applicant? I Yes ~) No © 3. Will the library site be leased by the applicant? lYes © No 4. If the library site will be leased, provide the name of the owner: > N/A 5. Was the site acquired with funds from the "Class Size Reduction Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1998"? I Yes © No [See Education Code section 19995(c)] 6. Is the site currently dedicated to the operation of a public library? J Yes © No Building (~or conva,~io. Projects Only) 7. Is the building to be converted currently owned by the applicant? I Yes © No O 8. Will the building be owned by the applicant? I Yes © No Title Considerations Site 9. Are there any exceptions to marketable record title? I Yes (~ No O Building (~orConvoraionP~jectsOnly) 10. Are there any exceptions to marketable record title? I Yes © No Appraisal (No appraisal is required if the value or the lend or building will not be claimed as an eligible project cost or a local matching fund cradit.) Site 11. What is the appraised value of the library site? > $ 575,000 (or library porlion of site, if multipurpose project) 12. Does the appraiser have a State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser's License? I Yes ~) No O Building (ForConveraionProjectsOnly) 13. What is the appraised value of the building? > $ {or library portion of site, if multipurpose project} 14, Does the appraiser have a State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser's License? I Yes © No © ISite Use Potential Accessibility Describe the accessibility of the proposed site for the residents in the library service araa: Equal Access Discuss the site's accessibility to all parts of the library service aroa and its location in relationship to the geographic center of the library service aroa. Discuss any natural and artificial barriers that may impede access to the site. The site for the proposed Temecula Public Library is ideally located in the geographical center of the City/Library Service Area. It is also centrally located within the educational and recreational ~heart" of the City, near several schools, the Rancho California Sports Park and the Community Recreation Center, which also houses the City's Teen Center. A major school complex including Temecula Valley High School, Rancho Vista High School (a continuation school) and the Temecula Valley Unified School District administrative office is located just 1.3 miles away. The Library's proposed location provides easy vehicular and bicycle access to the site from anywhere within the City. Pauba Road, which fronts the library site, is slated to be widened at the time of library construction to its ultimate width of four fanes with a dedicated left turn lane to enhance library access. The proposed library building is located on a shallow linear site, which places the building very near the existing sidewalk, and provides highly visible pedestrian access from the sidewalk. Access for disabled library users will be via the site's central landscape promenade to the building entrance. Curb cuts in the sidewalk on either side of the parking lot driveway provide disabled access to the path of travel. The central landscape promenade also becomes the accessible path for disabled patrons who have driven to the site. The north side of the site offers a substantial slope down to the athletic playing fields in the sports park. Pedestrian access from this direction is neither practical nor desirable. In fact, the library floor plan takes advantage of the elevation from this direction to bring the valley vista and northern light into the building. Number of public transit stops located within 1/4 mile of site: > 0 If public transit is available in the library service area, describe the various public transit access opportunities for the site. If no public transit is available in the library service area, enter "No Public Transit Service." The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) service area spans 2,500 square miles, making it the second largest service area of any transit company in the United States. Three bus routes serve the City of Temecula and the library service area. Bus service is supplemented and enhanced with Dial-a-Ride services, also provided through RTA. All three bus routes currently converge at County Center Drive, where the Riverside County Library Temecula Branch is located, providing opportunities for transfers to other lines. This allows public transit users from all over the City of Temecula and the library service aroa to access the existing County library. RTA is aware of the City's plans to build a new City Library on Pauba Road and has confirmed their commitment to add and/or re-route bus routes to provide service to the site once the Library is operational. The stop will be on the street just before or after the library driveway. The supporting documents for this application contain a letter from the RTA affirming its commitment to provide bus services to the site. The public transit map (provided as a supporting document for this application) indicates the existing three routes currently serving the City of Temecula. The map also shows the school sites that ara served by the bus routes, providing public transit to the Library for students. l0 Pedestrian & Bicycle Access Describe other access opportunities such as pedestrian walkways and bicycle paths. Discuss plans for amount and location of bicycle parking, including local ordinance requirements. The proposed Temecula Public Library sits at the top of a slope overlooking the Rancho California Sports Park and the Community Recreation Center, a 26,000 square foot facility that houses, among other activities, the City's Teen Center. The site is within a one-mile radius of three public schools and the Temecula Valley Unified School District Office; within a two-mile radius of six additional public schools; and within a three-mile radius of seven public schools. The site is surrounded by residential development. Situated in the middle of the block between two major traffic intersections, the site has sidewalk from both directions, providing pedestrian access. The City of Temecula has recently adopted a Multi-Use Trails and Bikeway Master Plan, which provides for Class II Bike Lanes on most major streets. Specifically, the three streets closest to the site, Margarita Road, Ynez Road and Rancho Vista Road are striped and signed as Class II Bike Lanes, providing bicycle access to the library site. In addition, Pauba Road (adjacent to the Library site) is programmed for Class II Bike Lanes, and will be included as part of the Pauba Road street improvements to be completed in conjunction with the library project. With regard to bicycle parking, the City's Development Code (Section 17.24) requires one bicycle space for every 20 vehicle parking spaces. The proposed library plan exceeds this requirement by 72% through the prevision of 12 bicycle parking spaces. The bike recks will be located in the plaza area near the front door of the library. Automobile Access Describe the site's accessibility by automobile for residents of the library service area. Take into consideration traffic, traffic systems, and availability of curb cuts. The library site, located near the geographical center of the City, is surrounded on three sides by major access streets: Ynez Road to the west is a 134-foot, 6 lane urban arterial; Margarita Road to the east is a 110-foot, 4 lane arterial; and Rancho Vista Road to the north is an 88-foot major collector street. These streets provide vehicular access to the site from all areas within the City. Pauba Road, the site of the proposed Library, is a major connector street. It will be widened, prior to completion of the library, to its ultimate width of 64 feet curb to curb, with 4 lanes and a dedicated left turn lane at the Library parking lot entrance. The driveway will act as one curb cut for vehicular access into the parking lot. The lot is designed for cimular travel within the parking lot and exits back onto the street using the same ddveway. Two additional curb cuts from the right-of-way provide pedestrian access to the site. Within the site, one curb cut allows pedestrian access onto the Timeline Promenade in front of the Library, and a final curb cut provides access away from the Timeline and into the library. Although the service area is the City boundary, the facility will be operated by Riverside County and will serve patrons outside ofthe City. Temecula is situated along either side of Interstate 15, with an Interstate 215 intersection two miles north of the City boundary. Highway 79 bounds the City to the North and South. The highway and surface street system allows easy access to the librery site from within the City, as well as from other Riverside County locations. Proximity to Maior Thorouclhfares List the major arterial routes in the library service area with the most recent traffic counts (number of vehicles per day): Number of Blocks Traffic Count Street Name from Site Count Date 1. · Pauba Road east of Ynez Road 4 8,724 08/07/01 2. · Pauba Road west of Margarita Road 2 7,439 08/07/01 3. · Margarita Road south of Rancho Vista Road 1 16,173 08/07/01 4. · Ynez Road south of Rancho California Road 5 25,603 08/07/01 11 Library Automobile Parking 1. Number of library parking spaces available off street, on library site ........................ > 135 spaces 2. Number of library parking spaces available off street, off library site ........................ > 0 spaces (within 500 feet of front door) 3. Number of parking spaces available on street ..................................................... > 0 spaces (within 500 feet of front door) 4. Total Number of Spaces Available for Library Parking .......................................... > 135 spaces Zoning Requirements 5. Number of on-site library parking spaces required by local zoning .......................... > 113 spaces 6. Was a zoning variance or waiver obtained for the ~reject for parking? ..................... > I Yes © No (~ I 7. If so, by how many spaces were the parking raquiraments reduced? ...................... > spaces 8. Provide number of square feet per parking space as required by local zoning .......... > 220 SF 9. If no local zoning requirement, provide the average number of square feet per parking space used in the project calculations .................................................. > SF Automobile Parking to Building Square Footage Ratio # of Square Feet of Parking > 45,897 SF 10. Calculate: = = 1.35 SF of Parking / 1 SF of Building # of Square Feet of Building > 34,000 SF # of Square Feet of Parklr~g t~,000 SF amp~ ------ -~,- ~'---: = ............. = 1.50~ SF of Par~ing 11 SF of Building ~ # of Squai'e Feet of Building 10,(]00 SF ~:~'~':;~; ~~'~ Library Bicycle Parking 11. Total Number of Spaces Available for on-site Library Bicycle Parking ..................... ;' 12 spaces 12 Parking Rationale Describe the rationale behind the amount of parking that will be available for the project, including: (1) the location of the automobile parking (on-site or off-site), both within and beyond 500 feet of the library entrance; (2) local zoning requirements; {3) the availability of public transportation; (4) bicycle parking and bicycle and pedestrian paths; and (5) any other considerations impacting automobile parking requirements including, but not limited to, parking partnerships with shared use agreements. Parking for library patrons is provided on the site to the immediate west of the building entrance. All on-site parking is within 500 feet of the library entrance. The local zoning ordinance for public buildings requires 1 parking space per 300 square feet. With 135 parking spaces, the library design exceeds this requirement by 22 spaces. The rationale for the additional parking is based on the lack of on-street parking along Pauba Road or other parking opportunities within 500 feet of the facility. Additional overflow parking is available at the fire station to the immediate east of the library and at the Rancho California Sports Park to the north of the library. Since ample parking for normal library services is provided on the site, the overflow parking will only be necessary in the event of a large public gathering at the library. Finally, should the City choose to expand the Library at some time in the future to its maximum potential size of 41,000 square feet, the parking will still be adequate to meet local zoning requirements. Parking was a critical consideration in the design process. As in many other southern California communities, Temecula has a large population of residents who use their cars daily to commute to jobs, shopping, schools, and recreational activities. While the site is narrow and linear, presenting some design challenges, it is centrally located within the City and the library service area and does provide adequate parking facilities for library users. School buses are accommodated in the on-site parking. The buses will park atthe parking arc while disembarking children onto the historic timeline promenade (learning begins before entering the library), or during inclement weather, children may disembark at the front door and the bus may continue to the bus parking location. A public transit stop will accommodate a Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) bus on Pauba Road at the library driveway. RTA has already affirmed that a bus stop will be installed at the library when it is opened. Situated between two major intersections, the site has sidewalk from all directions, providing pedestrian pathways from adjacent streets. Bicycle parking is accommodated in the plaza area in front of the library entrance. The City's Development Code requires one bicycle space for every 20-vehicle parking spaces, which equates to 7 bicycle parking spaces. The proposed library plan provides for 12 bike racks, which exceeds this requirement. Describe how visible and prominent the public library building will be within the library service area. The site for the Temecula Public Library provides a distinct opportunity for the facility to become a focal piece within the community. Set high on the edge of a hillside overlooking the entire Temecula Valley, the library will take advantage of spectacular views to the North, while also providing a distinct presence from the valley below. The site is accessed at the peak of Pauba Road; by utilizing the largest buildable pad area to the east end of the site, the building will sit on a plateau over Pauba Road, creating striking views as the visitor approaches from the roadside below, while also maintaining full on-site access to all parts of the library site. The library site is situated across from what will eventually become a new housing development to the south, and will also be very visible to existing homes to the north of the property. With the development to the south of the site and the widening of the roadway to accommodate increased traffic, Pauba Road has the potential to become an even stronger east-west axis throughout the Temecula community. By placing the library at the peak of Pauba Road, the visual prominence of the facility is guaranteed. 13 Community Context & Planning Describe the proximity of the proposed site to other facilities and areas of the community, and how that proximity enhances the use of the {ibrary by the residents in the library service area. Describe the appropriateness of the proposed site including whether the proposed library project will contribute to the establishment, redevelopment, or revitalization of a community or downtown core, business district, or neighborhood. Describe how the proposed library is connected to other uses, including public use facilities, by a full range of transportation and pedestrian options. Overlooking the Rancho California Sports Park, the library will be located in the geographical center of the City of Temecula. Adjacent to the library site, the sports park is the most heavily used park in the City's large park system. Hosting a variety of youth and adult sports and major special events, such as the 4th of July celebration and fireworks display, the park is known to everyone and is already a central gathering place for the community. As a component to the sports park, the 26,000 square foot Community Recreation Center (CRC) is home to the City's teen center, swimming pool complex, indoor gymnasium, amphitheatre, and community meeting rooms. Already familiar with the area, people will naturally gravitate to the new library location on their way to activities at the CRC, sports park, or when shopping throughout the City. Across Margarita Road, the Temecula Valley High School, Rancho Vista Continuation High School and Temecula Valley Unified School District office will act synergisfically to draw students and staff to the library. The Riverside Transit Agency provides public transit in the City through three separate bus routes. As indicated on the bus route map, bus service accomodates most district schools, shopping and business centers. Class II bike paths on major thoroughfares and neighborhood collectors present an alternate method of transportation to the site for bicyclists. Older, more established residential developments ara to the immediate north, east and west of the library site. Residential development continues to grow to the immediate south of the site, as well as large master planned communities and in-fill development that is happening throughtout the City. The Library's location near homes and schools makes it readily accessible to residents and students. With the projected growth of the City in the next five to ten years, the library will act as a community beacon, establishing and solidifying a sense of community character. Site Selection Process Describe the site selection process including community and planning department involvement, consultant assistance, as well as any other pertinent activities associated with determining the best site for the library project. The site selection process involved the community, the City Council, City staff, and the Library Design Committee. Nine sites wera studied as potential locations; they varied in size, cost and location within the Temecula area. The principal selection requirements balanced the need to create a more central, convenient location for as many rasidents as possible, with adding the least amount of financial burden on the City's finances. Each site was photographed, documented, and studied schematically with rough building and parking placement. The sites were prasented to the Library Design Committee, the Community Services Commission, and to the City Council. The nine sites were reduced to thrae after much analysis and discussion. The decision to eliminate certain sites was based primarily on cost, anticipated site development problems, and lack of visual prominence within the community. The early favorite soon became the selected site on Pauba Road. It is centrally located near several school sites, to the public sports and recreation complex and to both existing and planned housing developments. In addition, the site is striking; it incorporates a magnificent hillside location and the potential for diract north views across the valley. Finally, the City was already in possession of the property. These thrae factors led to a unanimous and enthusiastic selection of the Pauba Road property for the new Temecula Public Library. 14 Site Selection Summary Describe why the proposed site was selected and why it is the best available location for the proposed public library project. If there are problems with the proposed site, are there mitigating cimumstances that lessen the negative impact of the problem or problems? Describe any proposed design solutions that may moderate the site's drawbacks. The proposed library site was selected after much analysis and discussion with the Library Design Committee, comprised of community members, Council Members, a Community Services Commissioner, County representatives, School District staff, Library staff, and City staff. The site was selected because of its central location within the City, its proximity to schools and recreational facilities, easy access from major streets and intersections, adequate parcel size, and striking views. Because the City owned the property, funds that otherwise would have been used for pumhase of another site could be pmgremmed into the development of the selected site. The dramatic nature of the selected site for the Temecula Public Ubrary provided many design challenges and opportunities. The opportunities came in the form of a dramatic, linear site with a direct and prominent northern exposure, a centralized location and an extremely visible hillside location with views to and from the entire Temecula Valley. The challenges came in the form of topography, infrastructure, and the narrow width of the site. All of these challenges resulted in a better and stronger design solution and the creation of a striking design statement. To mitigate the steepness of the hillside, the facility was integrated into the topography as much as possible. This created many design opportunities and also enabled the facility to become part of the hillside rather than an object sitting atop it. The concept of a building which grows from the hillside became the defining goal of the project. This was achieved through a limited amount of grading to preserve the natural nature of the hillside and to reduce construction cost. The site itself was then lowered to gain level access from Pauba Road, while eliminating the need for many costly retaining walls. The minimal retaining walls that remained were clad in indigenous stacked granite to appear as natural as possible, further minimizing the impact of the building on the hillside. The result is a building that appears stable and comfortable as it rests within the hillside. Eliminating the need for expensive hillside grading and lengthy retaining walls also helped reduce the cost of the project. An initial concern about the width of Pauba Road and vehicular access to the site was mitigated through an agreement to widen Pauba Road and add a left turn lane onto the site. Not only will this alleviate potential traffic problems, but it will also serve to increase the use of Pauba Road, creating a stronger east to west arterial and providing the library with even greater visibility. The narrow nature of the site was probably the biggest initial concern and resulted in the project's greatest attribute. The major existing buildable area on the linear site exists to the east. The building was placed on this portion of the property to minimize expensive grading and lengthy retaining walls. This created a long, narrow parking condition, which led to an intriguing and contextually relevant design solution: the west end of the site is the beginning of an historical timeline, which leads through a landscaped area and terminates in the entry of the library. The timeline is meant to become a learning tool for the community and will feature fables, stories and historical facts that led to the development of Temecula, while also providing a shaded path to enter the building. The history revealed along the timeline augments the third and fourth grade school curricula. The building itself optimizes north views and light by stretching along the east west axis, An encrosed reading pomh and staff work areas all will front the dramatic north face of the building. t5 JSite Description Size The total square footage of the library site should equal the square footage shown in I through 8 below: AIIProiects (Except Murtipulpose Buildings) Sl3uare Footacle 1. Proposed Library Building Footprint~ > 33,998 SF 2. Proposed Library Surface Parking Lot > 45,897 SF 3. Proposed Library Parking Structure Footprint1 > 0 SF 4. Future Library Building Expansion Footprint1 > 41,000 SF 5. Future Library Parking Expansion > 0 SF 6. Required Local Zoning Set-Backs > 8,500 SF 7. Desired Aesthetic Set-Backs & Amenities > 27,5t9 SF 8. Miscellaneous & Unusable Space > 54,988 SF 9. Total Square Footage of Library Project Site > 211,902 SF 10. Proposed Under-Building Parking > 0 SF ~ "Footpdnt"means the square footage of surface area of the site that a building or structure occupies. For example, a single story 10,000 square root bu~ding would have a 10,000 square foot footprint, but a ~wo-story 10,000 square feot building with 5,~00 square feet on each level would have a footprint or 5,000 square feet. Multil~url~ose Buildin.cl Proiects Only A B C D Library~ Library Portion Other3 Other3 Dedicated of Common Common Dedicated SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT 1. Proposed Building > 2. Proposed Surface Parking Lot > 3. Proposed Parking Structure > 4. Future Building Expansion > 5. Future Parking Expansion > 6. Required Local Zoning Set-Backs > 7, Desired Aesthetic Set-Backs & Amenities > 8, Miscellaneous & Unusable Space > 9. Total Square Footage of Multipurpose Project Site 10. Proposed Under-Building Parking > 2 Ubrary means that portion of the project that provides space for the delivery and support of public library direct services, includin~ joint use school library services (co-location or joint venture). = "Other" uses means any other space that does not provide for the delivery and suppori of public library direct services. 16 Zoning Classification 1. What is the current zoning classification of the site? > PublJo/InstJtutJonal 2. Will the site have to be rezoned to build the project? I Yes O No Variance or Waiver 3. Will a zoning variance or waiver be needed to build the project? I Yes © No 4. If so, list the date the variance or waiver has been or will be granted: > (Date) Permits & Fees Permit & Fees Identification Provide a list of any site permits or fees that have been or will need to be obtained: Date Obtained or Permit or Fee Cost of Permit or Fee will be Obtained 5. · Grading $ 0 08/01/03 6. · Building Permit $ 0 08/01/03 7. · Sewer Connection Fee $ 67,310 12/01/03 8. · Water Meter Inspection Fee $ 15,000 12/01/03 Drainage 9. Is the site in the 100-Year Flood Plain? I Yes 0 No ~) 10. Do any watercoumes that require control drain onto the site? I Yes O No 11. Do any watercourses that require control drain off the site? I Yes O No (~ 12. Is the storm sewer system currently adequate to prevent localized flooding of the site? I Yes (~ No Describe any necessary mitigation measures regarding drainage. There is currently no storm sewer system in place on the north side of Pauba Road. The City of Temecula has approved plans for the ultimate widening of Pauba from Margarita Road west to Showalter Road, which includes the library site frontage. The project is fully funded and is in the City's five year Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2003/04. The Pauba Road Improvements will provide two lanes of travel in each direction and a center lane for left hand turn movements. Storm drains will also be installed as part of the Pauba Road improvement project. The Pauba Road improvement project will be completed prior to or concurrently with the library construction project. Therefore, an adequate storm sewer system will be in place to mitigate any storm impacts and prevent localized flooding of the site. 17 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) CEQA Litigation Are there any unresolved legal actions pending against the project regarding CEOA compliance? If so, provide the case name, court number, and a brief explanation. There are no unresolved legal actions pending against this project. Energy Conservation Describe what measures (include building design, solar orientation, materials, mechanical systems, natural ambient lighting, etc.) are planned to reduce energy consumption and operating costs for the library. The design for the Temecula Public Library creates an intelligent, efficient facility that optimizes the benefits of its northern orientation and the linear nature of the site. The northern orientation allows the maximization of good northern daylight, with the largest face of the structure oriented to the north. A linear light "monitor" allows diffused natural light to filter into the interior spaces within the library and also acts as the main cimulafion and organizing element in the facility. The monitor permits the interior electric lighting to turn off automatically when there is enough natural light i~resent, thereby reducing energy costs considerably. The Project Team reviewed the mechanical and electrical systems with the local utility provider's energy conservation team. Without increasing the upfront costs substantially or requiring a significantly long payback, the systems proposed were found to be excellent in energy conservation. The materials used throughout the facility feature natural materials wherever possible, to reduce maintenance and replacement costs. Indigenous stone and natural metals add to the overall simplicity and efficiency of the facility. Wherever possible, recycled and racyclable products are being used. Careful site planning led to the preservation of much of the natural slope and existing landscape. 18 Historic Buildings Historic Status 1, Was the existing building, if it is being renovated or expanded as part of the project, or any buildings on adjacent properties, built longer than 50 years ago? I Yes © No Is the existing library building project, or any buildings on adjacent properties: 2. On the National Register of Historic Places? I Yes © No 3. A National Historic Landmark? Yes O No 4. A National Monument? Yes © No 5. On County or Municipal Historic Designation list? Yes O No 6, On the California Register of Historical Resources list? Yes © No 7. A California Historical Landmark? Yes © No (~) 8, A State Point of Historical Interest? Yes © No Federal Compliance 9. Will this project utilize Federal funds or require a permit or license from a Federal Agency? I Yes © No 10. if yes, has the review process required by section 106 of the National Historic I Yes © No Preservation Act been completed? If not, please explain. N/A 19 State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) 1. Has the State Historic Preservation Office been contacted regarding the project? I ~'es (~ No © I If yes, summarize any comments received from SHPO. Does the project meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties? Please explain. No comments were received through the State Clearinghouse Review process. Local Historic Preservation Ordinance 2. Is there a local historic preservation ordinance that applies to the proposed project site or any adjacent properties? I Yes O No (~ If yes, briefly specify any applicable requirements or restrictions, such as height limits, etc. Further, describe any ways that the proposed project's conceptual design plans are not substantially in compliance with the local historic preservation ordinance. N/A 2O Geotechnical Report Identify and summarize any special geologic conditions, including, but not limited to, compressible and expansive soils, tunnels and mine shafts, unstable slopes, active seismic zones, excessive ground water and areas prone to liquefaction. Indicate if these conditions will prevent the use or significantly increase the cost of developing the site for a public library building. The following is a summary of the preliminary geotechnical investigation, conclusions and recommendations: 1.) The site investigation was completed on December 7, 1999, and indicates that the site is suitable from a geotechnical standpoint for the construction of the proposed library. 2.) The site soils encountered at the project site exhibited negligible to moderate collapse potential. 3.) Site grading, in general, should include removal and replacement as processed compacted fills for the upper three (3) to nine (9) feet of undocumented fills. Deeper removal may be required along some localized areas. 4.) The proposed fill/cut slopes with slopes 2:1 (H: V) are grossly stable under static as well as earthquake loading conditions. 5.) Groundwater was not encountered within our borings drilled to a maximum depth of 41.0 feet below existing ground surface. 6.) The nearest known active fault designated capable of generating significant ground motion at the site is approximately 1.7 miles southwest of this site. 7.) The project site is not susceptible to soil liquefaction during eadhquakes. 8.) The potential of seismic hazards due to the secondary effects of earthquakes including seismically induced ground settlement and differential settlement, is considered to be very Iow to Iow. 9.) Conventional spread footings founded on undisturbed natural soils or compacted fill and may be used to support the building. Foofings should be founded at least 18-inches below lowest adjacent final grade. The retaining wall along the northern side portion may be founded on piles. Concrete slabs-on-grade for such building may be of the conventional type as opposed to grade-beam or post-tensioned types. in summary, the geotechnical investigation did not present any conditions that would prevent the use or significantly increase the cost of developing the site as a public library facility. Demolition Describe any necessary demolition of structures and the associated costs involved with the site. {If no demolition, indicate by "N/A") Structure(s) to be Demolished Demolition Cost Estimate 1.> N/A 2.> $ 3.> 4.> $ 5.> $ 6.> Total Demolition: · $ 2t Utilities Describe availability of utilities and associated costs if any utilities are not currently located within 100 feet of a property line of the site. Utility Availability Cost to brincl Service to Site (Ineliqibie) 1. Electricity Yes (~ No O > 2. Fiber Optic Cable Yes ~ No O > $ 3. Telephone Yes ~ No O > $ 4. Gas Yes ~ No O > $ 5. Cable TV Yes ~ No O > $ 6. Storm Sewer Yes (~ No O > $ 7. Sanitary Sewer Yes (~ No © > $ 8. Water I Yes (~) No O > $ Site Development (All off-sits costs beyond fO0 foot utility tie.ins em local ineligible expenses, but shall be identified and included in the budget estimate under ineligible site development costs,) Site Development Costs Eii.qible lneli.qible 1. Utilities .................................................................. · $ 145,887 $ 0 2. Cut, Fill & Rough Grading .......................................... > $ 315,755 $ 0 3. Special Foundation Support (pilings, etc.) .................... > $ 59,410 $ 0 4. Paving, curbs, gutters & sidewalks .............................. > $ 293,260 $ 0 5. Retaining Walls ....................................................... > $ 84,009 $ 0 6. Landscaping ........................................................... > $ 531,393 $ 0 7. Signage .................................................................. > $ 2,491 $ 0 8. Lighting .................................................................... > $ 123,894 $ 0 9. Removal of underground tanks .................................... > $ 0 $ 0 10. Removal of toxic materials ......................................... > $ 0 $ 0 11. Rock removal ......................................................... > $ 0 $ 0 12. Traffic signals ......................................................... > $ 0 $ 0 13. Other (Specify): Screen walls, site furninishings > $ 89,950 $ 0 14. Other (Specify): Trellis, seatwall, fountain > $ 86,114 $ 0 15. TOTAL SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS: ..................... · $ 1,732,163 $ 22 INFORMATION INormal Public Construction Costs in the Applicant's Area For projects with new construction only (i.e., constructing s totally new tibra~ building or the expansion to an existing building) Construction Cost Index Approach: To justify the eflgible projected construction cost estimate for new construction, applicants shall complcte the following: 1) January 2002 current costs per square foot: A, Fornewfacilities: $202 ISF B. For square footage added to an existing building, i.e. "expansions": $238 ISF Multiply the sppmpflata County Locality adjustment Factor (2B) by the appropriate new cost per square foot figure (2C) (See section 20436 (c) (1) to obtain the "Locally Adjusted Construction Cost par Square Foot" figure (2D): County Locality Appropriate 2)A, County: > Riverside 8. Adjustment Factor:> 0.99 X C. New Cost/SF:> $ 202 /St: = D. > $ 200 ISF Name of Project County (Select: IA or 1 B) 3) A. Locally Adjusted Construction Cost Per Square Foot: > $ 200 ISF (ne-enter Line 2D) The "Locafly Adjusted Construction Cost per Square Foot" (3A) figure may be increased by 1/5 percent per month for each month from January 1, 2002, through to the estimated mid-point of construction of the project. Multiply the number of months (4A) times .002 (1.5%) to get an Inflation factor (4B), Multiply the inflation factor (4e) times the "Locally adjusted Construction Cost per Square Foot" figure (4C) to get an "Additional Cost per Square Foot" figure (4D) Number inflation Locally Adjusted Additional $1SF 4) A. of Months:· 29 X .002 = B. Factor: · .058 X C. Construction $/SF: · $ 200 ISF = D. · $ 12 ISF ~ (1/5%) (Re-enter 3A) Add the resulting "Additional Cost per Square Foot" figure (SA) to tho "Locally Adjusted Construction Cast per Square Foot" figure (Se) to get the "Eligible Projected Construction Cost per Square Foot" figure (5C): Additional Locally Adjusted Eligible Projected 5) A. CostJSF:> $ 12 ISF + 8. Construction$/SF:> $ 200 /SF = C. Construction$1SF:> $ 212 ISF (Re-enter 4D) (Re-enter 4C) The total "Eligible Projected Construction Cost" for the project is calculated by multiplying the "Eligible Projected Construction Cost per Square Foot" figure (5C) by the total number of square feet of new construction: 6) The Eligible Projected Construction $1SF: · $ 212 /SF Multiplied By (Re.enter 5C} 7) The Square Footage of New Construction: > 34,000 SF Equals 8) The Eligible Projected Construction Cost: · $ 7,210,000 If the projected construction cost estimated by the project amhitect is lower than the figure in Line 8, the applicant shall use the lower figure as the normal public construction cost in the applioant's area. IA10% contingency amount is allowed and is calculated by multiplying the total Eligible Projected Construction Cost by 10%: project 9) Eligible Contingency: (10% of Line 8) · $ 721,000 23 Comparable Public Construction Approach: As an alternate to the Construction Cost Index approach to ealJme6ng normal cons~u~on costs in the appticant's area, the applicant may emproy a local puhtic construction cost comparison approach to calculate the Eligible Projected Constmc6on Cost Ifgure. [See section 20436 (c) (3)]. List a minimum of three comparable public construction projects thai have been bid within the applicant's County within three years of the Board's deadline for application. Comparebts public oanstructJon projects are public tibrarios, community co~legos, post offices, museums, courthouses, dty halls, auditoriums, convenlJon centers, civic centers, senior citizens centers, public schools, and recreation centers. The costs listed sharl be for construction of the building only and exclusive of any site acquisition, demolition, development, utilities, or landscaping; su#aoa and under building parking; works of art; she~'ing; furniture; built-in service desks, counters, workstations, or other casework; movable equipment; or architectural and engineering fees. Construction Project Date Bid CostJSF A. > ISF B, > /SF C. > ISF D. > /SF E. TOTAL · $ ISF 10) Locally Determined Comparable Coat per Square Foot ($/SF): > $ Divided by · =>~' $ 0 ISF Re-enter Line E # of Projects Locally Determined Comparable Cost per Square Foot The "Locally Determined Comparable Cost per Square Foot" (10) figure may be increased by 1/5 percent per month for each month from January 1, 2002, through to the estimated mid-point of construction of the project. Multiply the number of Months (f lA) times .002 (1/5%) to get an inflation factor (r t'B). Multiply the inflation factor (ttB) times the "Locally Determined Comparable Cost per Square Foot" tigure (1 rC) to get the "Additional Cost per Square Foot" figure (t' ID): Number Inflation Locally Determined 11) A. of Months: · X .002 = B. Factor: > X C. Comparable $/SF: > 0 ISF = D, · $ ISF (115%) (Re.enter t0) Adding the resulting "Additional Cost per Square Foot" figure (f2A) to the "Locally Determined Construction Cost per Square Foot" figure (12B) gives the "Eligible Projected Construction Cost per Square Foot" figure (f2C): Additional Locally Determined Eligible Projected 12) A, Cost/SF:· $ ISF + B. Construction$/SF:· 0 ISF = C. Construction $/SF:· $ /SF (Re-enter 11{)) {Re-enter 11C) The "Eligible Projected ConatrectJon Cost' is calculated by multiplying the "Eligible Projected Construction Cosl per Square Foot" figure (120) limes the square footage of new construction: 13) The Eligible Projected Construction $1SF: · $ ISF Multiplied By (Re-enter 12C) 14) The Square Footage of New Construction: · SF Equals 15) The Eligible Projected Construction Cost: · If the projected construction cost estimated by the project architect is lower than the figure in Line 15, the applicant shall use the lower figure as the normal public construction cost in the applicant's area. IA 10% project contingency amount is allowed and is calculated by multiplying the total Eligible Projected Construction Cost by 10%: 16) Eligible Contingency: (I0% of Line 15) · $ 24 LibraryProjectBudget (AIIpmjectsexceptlt, fultlpurposeProJact$) If there ara no costs in any line item below for the project, specify by putting a zero '~" ln the blank provided. Line Items: Eli.qible Ineligible 1) New Construction ....................................................................... > $ 6,795,580 $ 0 2) Remodeling Construction ............................................................ > $ 0 $ 0 3) Contingency .............................................................................. > $ 679,558 $ 0 4) Appraised Value of Building ........................................................... · $ 0 $ 0 5) Appraised Value of Land .............................................................. · $ 575,000 $ 0 6) Site Development ....................................................................... · $ 1,732,163 $ 0 7) Site Demolition ........................................................................... · $ 0 $ 0 8) Site Permits & Fees .................................................................... · $ 166,444 $ 0 9) Site Option to Purchase Agreement ............................................... · $ 0 $ 0 10) Furnishings& Equipment Costs .................................................... > $ 1,488,000 $ 0 tl) Signage .................................................................................... · $ 93,100 $ 0 12) Architectural & Engineering Costs .................................................. · $ 601,178 $ 65,500 13) Construction Cost Estimator Fees ................................................. · $ 175,000 $ 0 14) Interior Designer Fees ................................................................. · $ 13,300 $ 0 15) Geotechnical/Geohazard Reports ................................................. · $ 11,300 $ 0 16) Hazardous Materials Consultant Fees ........................................... > $ 0 $ 0 17) Energy Audit, Structural Engineering, Feasibilify & ADA Studies ........... · $ 0 $ 0 18) Library Consultant Fee ................................................................ · $ 22,000 $ 47,816 19) Construction Project Management ................................................ · $ 460,000 $ 0 20) Other Professional Fees .............................................................. > $ 165,520 $ 38,200 21) Local Project Administration Costs ................................................ · $ 102,200 $ 408,800 22) Works of Art .............................................................................. · $ 0 $ 25,000 23) Relocation Costs & Moving Costs .................................................. · $ 0 $ 0 24) Acquisition of Library Materials ..................................................... · $ 0 $ 1,250,000 25) Other (Specify):Preliminary Title Report · $ 500 $ 0 26) Other (Specify):Fire Safety Water Pressure Test · $ 275 $ 0 27) Other (Specify):Reprographics · $ 25,000 $ 0 28) TOTAL PROJECT COSTS: .......................................................... · $ 13,106,118 $ 1,835,316 25 Sources of Project Revenue (All projects except Multipurpose Projects) 29) State Matching Funds (65% of Line 281 Eligibre Costs) .......................................................... · $ 8,518,977 30) Loca[ Matching Funds (Line 28 Eligible Costs minus Line 29) ...................................................... · $ 4,587,141 [Bust also equal the total of Lines 3f . 39] Sources of Local Matching Funds: 31) City .......................................................................................... > $ 4,487,141 32) County ..................................................................................... · $ 0 33) Special District .......................................................................... · $ 0 34) Private ..................................................................................... · $ 100,000 35) Other (Specify): · $ 0 36) Local Credits [Land2 and A&E Fees] .......................................................................... > $ 640,500 37) Adjusted Local Match [Line 30 minus Une 36] .................................................................... > $ 3,946,641 38) Supplemental Local Funds [Same as Line 28 ineligiblel ......................................................... · $ 1,835,316 39) TOTAL PROJECT INCOME: (Add Unes 29, 30, and 38] ....................................................... · $ 14,941,434 ~ Up to a maximum of $20,~00,000 2 Lend credit is not allowed for land acquired by funds from the "Class Size Reduction Kindergarten. Univereity Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1999" [See Education Code section 19999 (c) which references Part 98 (commencing with section 100400 of the Education Code)] Projected Library Operating Budget (New Public Libraries, including Conversion Projects except Multipurpose Projects) INITIAL START-UP EXPENDITURES EXPENSES ANNUAL EXPENSES 1. Salaries/Benefits · $ 0 $ 1,050,000 2. Facilities Costs · $ 0 $ 120,000 Insurance Maintenance [Including Custodial, Trash, Landscaping, etc.] Security Uttiities Other (Specify): 3. Equipment · $ 177,250 $ 80,000 Equipment Supplies 4. Materials > $ 1,000,000 $ 40,000 Books, AY, Magazines, & Newspapers Electronic Sauces & Subscriptions Other Foamers 5. other AIIocations (As applicable to the proposed projecl) · $ 0 $ 190,622 Administrative/Business Office Branch Operations Circulation Services Facilities & Capital Coordination Program Placniag Technical Sewices Other (Specify): 6. Miscellaneous (Other) · $ 0 $ 0 7. TOTAL EXPENDITURES: · $ 1,177,250 $ 1,480,622 26 Multipurpose Project Budget OtVith Library Project Budget) rMultipu osa Projocts Only) If thera are no costs in any line item below for the projec~ specify by pu~Jng a zero "O"in the blank apace provided. A B C D E Library~ Library Portion Library Library Other2 Dedicated of Common Total Total Total Line Items: Eli.qible Eli.qible EliRible Ineliqible Ineli.qible 1. New Construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 2. Remodeling Construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 3. Contingency $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 4. Appraised Value of Building $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 5. Appraised Value of Land $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 6, Site Development $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 7. Site Demolition $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 8. Site Permits & Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 9. Site Option Agreement $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 10. Furnishings & Equipment Costs $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 11. Signage $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 12. Amhitectural & Engineering Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 13. Construction Cost Estimator Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 14. Intedor Designer Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 15. Geotechnicai/Geohazard Reports $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 16. Hazardous Materials Consultant Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 17. Energy Audit, Structural, ADA, & Engineering Feasibility Studies $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 18. Library Consultant Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 19. Construction/Project Management $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 20. Other Professional Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 21. Local Project Administration Costs $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 22. Works of Art $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 23. Relocation Costs & Moving Costs $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 24. Acquisition of Ubrary Materials $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 25. Other (Specify): $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 26. Total Project Costs: $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ~ Library means that portion of the project ghat provides space for the delivery end support of public library direct services, including Joint use school library services (co. location or joint venture). 2 "Other" uses means any other space that does not provide for the delivery and support of public library direct services. 27 Sources of Multipurpose Project Revenue (Multipurpose Projects Only) 27. State Matching Funds (65% of Une 26 total eligible costs~) .......................................................... > $ 28, Local Matching Funds ............................................................................................. > $ [Column C, Line 26 minus Line 27. Must also equal the total of Lines 29-33.] Sources of Local Matching Funds: 29} City .......................................................................................... > $ 30) County ..................................................................................... · 31) Special District .......................................................................... · $ 32) Private ..................................................................................... · $ 33) Other (Specify): · $ 34. Local Credits [Land2 and A&E Fees] .......................................................................... · 35. Adjusted Local Match (Line 28 minus Line 34) .................................................................... > $ 36, Supplemental Local Funds (Same as Line 26 Ubrary (D) and Other (E) Total Ineligible) ........................ > $ 37. TOTAL PROJECT INCOME: (Arid Lines 27, 28 and 36) ....................................................... > $ ~ Up to s maximum of $20,o00,ooo ~ Land credit is not allowed for land acquired by funds from the "Class Size Reduction Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1998" [See Education Code section 19995 (c) which references Part 68 (commencing with section 100400 of the Education Coda)] Projected Library Operating Budget (Muitipu,ooss ~aw Const.,ction e.d Convorslon P,olscts Only) INITIAL START-UP ANNUAL EXPENDITURES EXPENSES EXPENSES 1. Salaries/Benefits · $ 2. Facilities Costs · $ $ Insurance Maintenance [Including Custodial, Trash, Landscaping, etc. J Security Utilities Other (SpecifT): 3. Equipment · $ $ Equipment Supplies 4. Materials · $ $ Bceks, AV, Magazines, & Newspapers Electronic Services & Subscriptions Other Formats 5. Other Allocations (As applicable to the proposed project) · $ $ Administrative/Bus[ness Office Branch Operations Circulation Se~ices Facilities & Capital Coordination Program Ptsnning Technical Services Other (SpedfT): 6. Miscellaneous (Other) · $ $ 7. TOTAL EXPENDITURES: · $ $ 28 Financial Capacity (New Construction and Conversion Projects Only) Applicants with new public library projects shall describe their financial capacity to open and maintain operation of the proposed library including anticipated revenue sources for library operations support. Riverside County is one of the fastest-growing areas of the State and, as a consequence, local government's property-related income is also growing. Since 1965, the Riverside County Library System has been funded primarily by a separate property tax rate established by the County Board of Supervisors. In addition to the property tax increment, the County Library has multiple other funding sources including: contractual redevelopment pass-through funds; contractual revenue from partnerships with other jurisdictions, fines and fees, State Public Library Foundation Funds, State reimbursement revenue, grant funds and donations. Current projections are for property tax and redevelopment pass-through revenues to increase appreximately 10 percent per year. in addition to these operating revenue sources, the Library is a part of the Riverside County Mitigation Fee Program. Through this program, the County Library receives development mitigation funds for capital facility construction and for library materials. Fees from this program will support the new Temecula Public Library with a one million dollar contribution toward an opening-day collection of library materials. The City of Temecuia contributes to the County Library in order to have extended hours of service and staffing at the current Temecula branch facirity. When the new Temecula Public Library opens, the City will spend approximately a million doilars annually to supplement the County Library's funding level for both libraries. The City and the County Library have a real partnership in planning and operating a public library. This partnership is embodied in their shared financial committment. The strength of two growing jurisdictions contribute to the reliability and stability of the new Library's funding. Provide the timetable for the proposed project. ACTIVITY DATE. 1. Planning and Land Use Permits Obtained (If Applicable) · N/A 2. Site Acquired (Obtain Possession by Purchase, Donation or Lease) · 04/21/93 3. Schematic Plans Completion · 05/01/02 4. Design Development Plans Completion · 08/01/02 5. Working Drawings (90%) Completion · 02101103 6. Construction Documents Completion · 04/01/03 7. Project Advertised for Bids · 05/01/03 8. Start of Construction · 08/01/03 9. Estimated Mid-Point of Construction · 06/01/04 10. Completion of Construction · 04/01/05 11. Opening of Library Building to the Public · 05/01/05 12. Final Fiscal & Program Compliance Review Completed · 10101105 29 ' ,'LICATION ...... CERTIFICATION $10NATURE$ The parties below attest to and certify the accuracy and truthfulness of the application for California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 funds. If the application is successful, the applicant agrees to execute the project on the basis of the application data provided herein including all supporting documents. IAUTHORIZED OFFICIAL OF THE APPLICANT JURISDICTION Signature of Mayor, Chairperson of Board of Supervisors, or Head of District, authorized to make application for the local jurisdiction. > Signature Date · Jeffrey E.Stone · Mayor Pro-Tern Name (type) Title (type) ILIBRARY DIRECTOR OF THE OPERATING LIBRARY JURISDICTION I I hereby affirm that the library jurisdiction for which I am the administrative agent, approves of the application and wilt operate the facility as a public library after its completion. Signature Date · Gary Christmas · County Librarian Name (type) Title (type) · SUBMITCOMPLETEDAPPLICATIONFORMANDSUPPORTINGDOCUMENTSACCORDINGTO INSTRUCTIONS IN SECTION 20440 · MAILAPPLICATIONANDSUPPORTINGDOCUMENTSTO: Bond Act Fiscal Officer Office of Library Construction 1029 J Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814-2825 3O ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT~_~ CITY MANAGER CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~f~' DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 PREPARED BY: Karen Jes stant Finance Director Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant ?1~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 and approve the following: 1. An appropriation of $150,000.00 in the City Attorney line item in the General Fund. 2. An appropriation of $50,000.00 in the Internal Service Fund Insurance Fund. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City for the Nine months ended March 31, 2002. Please see the attached financial statements for an analytical review of financial activity. The request for an additional appropriation in the City Attorney department line item is due to an increased in legal costs relating to various litigation and development project activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of Mamh 31, 2002 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Combining Balance Sheet (Internal Service Funds) as of March 31,2002 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Internal Service Funds) for the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Combining Balance Sheet (Community Facilities Districts) as of March 31,2002 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance (Community Facilities Districts) for the Nine Months Ended Mamh 31,2002 CITY OF TEMECULA Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31,2002 and the Statements of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings For The Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department City of Temecula Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2002 State General Gas Tax Transportation Dev Impact CDBG Fund Fund Fund Fund l~und Assets: Cash andinvestmems $ 18,934,480 $ $ 498,978 $ 8,061,785 $ 296,988 Receivables 2,267,340 87,505 3,185 103,846 Due from other funds (7,987) Advances to other f~nds 2.801,453 Deposits 18,463 Land held for resale 530,401 Tmalassets $ 24,552,137 $ 87,505 502,163 $ 8,157,644 $ 296,988 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Advances from other funds Other current liabilities $ 6,023,017 Deferred revenue 506,277 $ 78,450 Total liabilities 6,529,294 78,450 Fund balances: Reserved 2,844,040 Designated $ 87,505 502,163 7,698,531 Undesignated I5,i78,803 380,663 296,988 Total fired balances 18,022,843 87,505 502,163 8,079,194 296,988 Total liabilities and ~nd balances $ 24,552,137 $ 87,505 ~502,163 $ 8,157,644 $ 296,988 City of Temecula Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31. 2002 Law Enforcement Marg Rd AB 2766 Grants Measure "A" CIP Reim Dist Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund TotaI Assets: Cash and investments $ 89,466 $ 129.691 $ 1.594.734 $ 15.699,321 $ 45,305.443 Receivables 15,506 141 10,050 2.199.209 4.686.782 Due from other funds -7.987 Advances to other funds 2.801.453 Deposits 18.463 Land held for resale 530,40l Total assets $ 104,972 129.832 $ 1,604,784 $ 17,898,530 $ $ 53.334.555 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Advances from other funds $ 1.425.000 $ 1,425,000 Other current liabilities 967,068 6,990.085 Deferred revenue 229.796 814,523 Total ]iabili0es 2.621.864 9,229,608 Fund balances: Reserved 2,844.040 Designated $ 104,972 129.832 1.604.784 10,127.787 Undesignated 15.276.666 31~133.120 Total fund balances 104.972 129.832 1,604,784 i5.276.666 44.104,947 Total liabilities and f~nd balances $ 104,972 129,832 $ 1,604,784 $ 17,898.530 $ $ 53,334.555 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual General Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Percent Budget Activity of Budget Revenues: Sales tax $ 17,670,000 $ 12,350,917 70% (1) Developmental services: Planning 312,000 257,852 83% (2) Building & safety 1,595,000 1,035,995 65% Land development 1,218,000 1,328,567 109% (3) Fire 172,000 122,916 71% Grants 245,200 94,703 39% (4) AB3229 (COPS) 129,600 0% Motor vehicle in lieu 3,128,000 2,548,826 81% Property tax 2,072,000 1,270,118 61% (5) Property transfer tax 407,000 329,121 81% Franchise fees 1,676,000 921,214 55% (6) Transient occupancy tax 1,417,000 1,042,704 74% Reimbursements 280,000 202,196 72% Reimbursements from TCSD 162,000 121,500 75% Reimbursements from RDA 225,000 168,750 75% Reimbursements from CIP 1,207,000 489,996 4i% (7) Investment interest 805,000 729,629 91% (8) Business licenses 205,000 203,209 99% (9) Vehicle code fines 363,000 272,383 75% Miscellaneous 72,000 109,368 152% Parking citations/impound fees 100,000 86,397 86% Operating transfers in 1,157,000 680,210 59% Total Revenues $ 34,617,800 $ 24,366,571 70% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual General Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 3I, 2002 Annual YTD Amended YTD Activity Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. + Encumbr of Budget Expenditures: City Council $ 334,060 $ 267,532 $ (9,921) $ 257,611 77% Community Support 428,414 292,024 67,091 359, l 15 84% (I0) City Manager 689,537 458,033 7,598 465,631 68% Economic Development 844,206 568,981 42,395 611,376 72% City Clerk 746,387 455,769 24,972 480,741 64% City Attorney 545,000 455,232 i0,000 465,232 85% (i 1) Finance 1,236,840 772,193 32~098 804,291 65% Human Resources 399,932 257,897 24.873 282,770 71% Planning 3,079,669 1330,844 565.907 2,296,751 75% Budding & Safety 1,986,541 1,232,675 186,785 1,419.460 71% Land Development 1,202,197 788,919 34,141 823,060 68% Public Works 4,934,003 2,719.453 558,166 3,277.619 66% CIP Admin 1,623,993 920,810 23,491 944,301 58% Police 8,942,011 6.476,721 60,455 6,537,176 73% Fire Dept 3,102,664 2,073,531 75,928 2,149,459 69% Animal Control 115,700 57,423 57,423 50% Non-departmen tal 4,222.000 3,190,181 3,190,181 76 % Total Expenditures (Excluding Transfers) 34,433,154 22,718,218 1,703,979 24,422,197 71% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 184,646 1,648,353 Operating Transfers Out 5,030,000 5,030,000 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers (4,845,354) (3,381.647) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,200i 21.404,490 21,404,490 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 16,559, I36 $ 18,022.843 Notes: (1) The variance is due to timing of payment of sa]es tax receipt for this quarter. (2) The variance in pIanning revenue is due mainly to several specific plans being processed during the current fiscal year. (3) The variance in Land Development revenue is due to several grading permits, inspections and improvement plans being processed during the current fiscal year. (4) The variance is due to several grants scheduled to be received by the end of the fiscal year. (5) Property tax revenue is received primarily in January and May each year. (6) The variance in franchise fee revenue is due to several entities that have annual payments due in the last quarter of the fiscal year. (7) The variance is due primarily to lower than anticipated costs being incurred for the administration of CIP projects. (8) The variance in investment interest is due to higher than anticipated cash and investment balances being maintained. (9) The variance in business license revenue is due to the annual renewal process which occurs in December and January each year. (10) The variance in community support is due to several CS funding awards distributed to recipients and fiscal yea 01-02 commited funds for several projects processed during this quarter. (1 l) The variance in City Attorney is due to higher than anticipated legal cost being incurred during this fiscal year. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Gas Tax Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Section 2105-2107 $ 1,150,500 $ 764,257 $ 764,257 66% Investment interest 6.500 3,458 3,458 53% Total Revenues 1,157.000 767,715 767,715 66% Expenditures: Operating transfers out 1,157,000 680,210 680,210 59% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 87,505 Beginning Fund Balance, July l, 200i Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ $ 87,505 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual State Transportation Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Buclget Revenues: Investment interest $ $ 10,754 $ 10,754 Traffic congestion relief 194,600 92,790 92,790 48% Total Revenues 194,600 103,544 103,544 53% Expenditures: Operating transfers out 489,600 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (295,000) 103,544 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 398,619 398,619 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 103,619 $ 502,163 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Development Impact Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Quimby $ 160,000 $ 308,197 $ 308,197 193% Street improvements 998,000 728,507 728,507 73% Traffic signals 248,000 144,340 144,340 58% Parks 793,000 344.712 344,712 43% Corporate facilities 252,000 162,026 162,026 64% Fire protection 65,000 48,359 48,359 74% Library 197,000 I I0,925 110,925 56% Public facilities 3,113 3,113 Investment interest 213,921 213,921 Total Revenues 2,713,000 2,064,100 2.064,100 76% Expenditures: Operating transfers out 7,991,380 2,532,600 2,532,600 32% (1) Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (5,278,380) (468,500) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 8,547,694 8,547,694 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 3,269,314 $ 8,079,194 (1) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when DIF funded projects are started and costs are incurred. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Community Developme~t Block Grant For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Grant revenue $ 936,300 $ 449,953 $ 449,953 48% Total Revenues 936,300 449,953 449,953 48% Expenditures: Other outside services Operating transfers out 696,300 152,965 152,965 22% Total Expenditures 696,300 152,965 152,965 22% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 240,000 296,988 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 240,000 $ 296,988 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual AB 2766 Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 3l, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: AB 2766 $ 58,000 $ 46,503 $ 46,503 80% Investment interest 1,498 1,498 Total Revenues 58,000 48,001 48,001 83% Expenditures: Operating transfers out 130,000 Total Expenditures 130,000 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (72,000) 48,001 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 56,971 56,971 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ (15,029) $ 104,972 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Law Enforcement Grants For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Total Revenues AB 3229 - COPS $ $ 129,691 129,691 Investment interest 141 141 0 129,832 Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 0 129,832 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 $ 0 0 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 0 $ 129,832 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure "A" For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Measure "A" $ 1.643,000 $ 1,361,806 $ 1,361,806 83% Investment interest 59,400 59,400 Total Revenues 1,643,000 1,421,206 1,421,206 87% Expenditures: Debt service - principal 396,138 297.103 297,103 75% Debt service - interest 183,344 127.037 127,037 69% Operating transfers out 3,517,880 2,419,286 2,419,286 69% Total Expenditures 4,097,362 2,843,426 2,843,426 69% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (2,454,362) (1,422,220) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 3,027,004 3,027,004 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 572,642 $ 1,604,784 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital hnprovement Projects Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: (1) Operating transfers in $ 20,112,840 $ 10,404,851 $ 10,404,851 52% Grants 1,176,200 638,556 638,556 54% Reimbursements 6,258,850 983,660 983,660 16% Investment interest 119,276 119,276 Sale of property 29,210 Article 3 (SB 821) 216,750 38,843 38,843 18% Total Revenues 27,764,640 12,214,396 i2,185.186 44% Expenditures: (1) Murrieta creek bridge/Overland ext 211,426 27,484 29,250 56,734 27% Pala Rd Interim improvements 4,554 2,552 2,002 4,554 I00% Overland overcrossJng 74,328 1,000 23,333 24,333 33% Pauba Rd Improvements li 32,044 24,863 7,181 32,044 100% Intersection monitoring system 868,242 (539) 21,568 21,029 2% Winchester Rd widening 1,960,910 1,708 1,708 0% Rancho Ca Rd wide/Ynez Rd 322,866 2,765 2,435 5,200 2% Emergency generator 195,000 I 17,174 27,139 144,313 74% Traffic signals Butterfield/Rancho Ca 169,518 89,732 89,732 53% Pala Rd. bridge 383,426 (32,397) 266,264 233,867 61% Diaz realignment 933,447 50,960 11,445 62,405 7% Pavement rehabilitation 2,531,868 1,550,337 833,888 2,384,225 94% Jefferson pavement improvement 466,619 361,559 336 361,895 78% Il 5/79S interchange (ultimate) 533,203 2,256 20,813 23,069 4% Pala Road improvements 2,410,316 29,084 249,759 278,843 12% Flashing beacons 2000 20,000 Diaz road extension at Cherry street 168,686 49,588 119,098 168,686 100% I15/Winchester Road ramp improvements 69,116 69, i 16 69,116 100% Date street/Cherry Overpass 1,186,059 4,687 5,600 10,287 1% IlS/Santiago interchange 8,601 841 7,760 8,601 100% Margarita improvements Plo Pico/79S 1,164,987 942,261 195,916 1,138,177 98% Murrieta creek interi m./Via Montezuma 35,180 27,953 2,279 30,232 86% Murrieta creek bridge widening R.C. 678,409 141,425 119,950 261,375 39% Traffic signal equipment installation 210,000 10.014 10,014 5% Traffic signals Margarita/DePortola 2,238 2,889 (2,358) 531 24% Traffic signals Margarita/Stonewood 149,426 135,444 400 135,844 91% (continued) City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital Improvement Projects Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Woodside landscaping 78,292 78,292 78,292 100% Fiber optic conduits 118,800 118,800 118,800 100% Date/Cherry Street S.B. offramp 1,232,064 46,296 46,296 4% 1-15 onramp widening @ Winchester 960 960 960 100% Margarita/Winchester intersection imp. 33,862 2,799 472 3.271 10% Bridge barrier rail repl 190,000 14,263 38,730 52,993 28% Butterfield Stage Rd ext 130,000 Date/Cherry ext Diaz-Jeff 1.820,000 Date/Cherry MHS to Margarita 5,372,000 Date/Cherry I- 15 offramp 1,000,000 John Warner/Santiago Rd 220,000 Signal Diaz @ Winchester 168,000 130,722 130,722 78% Winch/79S landscaping 100,000 Ynez Road median 170,000 45,686 45,686 27% Tax defaulted properties 103,100 Maint fac parking lot 245,000 5,949 5,949 2% Fire stateion Wolf Creek 229,230 106,719 68,731 175,450 77% 79S sidewalk]landscape 260,000 4,894 4,894 2% Murrieta Creek improv. 150,000 Rainbow Canyon sidewalks 53,750 2.041 2,041 4% Pedestrian Bridge/Hwy 79N 400,000 625 625 0% Vail Rch interim fire station 250,000 242,279 7,378 249,657 100% Old Town south parking lot 41,617 41,617 41,617 100% Starlight Ridge sidewalk 167,839 54,580 116 54,696 33% Murrieta Creek multi-purpose trail 200,000 5,351 37,300 42,651 21% Maintenance facility modification 859,933 843,372 39,385 882,757 103% Senior center expansion 614.068 606,175 l 2,443 618,618 101% Children's museum 2,259,497 190,829 716,868 907,697 40% Conmmnity theater 445,621 136,112 309,509 445,621 100% Chaparral HS swimming pool 2,876,677 2,016,761 846,612 2,863,373 100% Desiltation pond 5,040 2,454 2,610 5,064 100% Northwest sports complex 5,845,028 21,773 24,883 46,656 1% Sports park field lighting 33,910 33,910 33,910 100% Trails master plan 18.021 15,74I 2,452 I8,193 101% Sports park culvert design 11,339 10,672 10,672 94% Pluy structure retrofit 50,000 13,937 13,937 28% RC sports park ADA access 79,500 School site ADA improv 500 466 466 93% Vail Ranch add amenities 300,000 4,911 20,624 25,535 9% City hull improvements 791 791 791 100% Library 429,012 64,711 204,078 268,789 63% City hail complex 75,000 Total Expenditures (Excluding Transfers) 41,428,920 8,120,781 4,632~712 12,753,493 31% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (I 3,664.280) 4,093,615 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1. 2001 11,183,051 11,183,051 Ending Ftmd Balance. September 30, 2002 $ (2,481,229) $ 15,276,666 Notes: (I) The variances in CIP Fund revenues and in project expenditures are due to the timing of when the various projects are actually started and costs are incurred. Internal Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2002 Information Support Insurance Vehicles Systems Services Facilities Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total Assets: Cash and investments $ 1,343,556 $ 279,297 $ 597,469 $ 211,570 $ 94,674 $ 2,526,566 Receivables 8,422 1,545 4,414 1,911 992 17,284 Prepaid assets 188,517 188,517 Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation) 618,254 545,942 251,073 1,415,269 Total assets $ 1,540,495 $ 899,096 $ 1,147,825 $ 464,554 $ 95,666 $ 4,147,636 Liabilities and fund equity: Liabilities: Currentliabilities $ 663,987 $ $ 41,646 $ 7,147 $ 33,402 $ 746,182 Capital leases payable 247,842 247,842 Total liabilities 663,987 0 41,646 254,989 33,402 994,024 Fund equity: Contributed capital 500,000 214,539 473,065 94,177 1,281,781 Retained earnings 376,508 684,557 633,114 115,388 62,264 1,871,831 Total fund equity 876,508 899,096 1,I06,179 209,565 62,264 3,153,612 Total liabilities and fund equity $ 1,540,495 $ 899,096 $ 1,147,825 $ 464,554 $ 95,666 $ 4,147,636 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Internal Service Funds For the Nine Months Ended March 3 l, 2002 Information Support Insurance Vehicles Systems Services Facilities Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total Revenues: Charges for services $ 332,417 $ 142,716 $ 792,682 $ 169,262 $ 297,118 $ 1,734,195 Investment interest 34,136 3,623 10,090 4,482 836 53,i67 Miscellaneous 1,032 1,795 276 28,821 25 31,949 Operating transfer in 333,268 333,268 Total Revenues 367,585 481,402 803,048 202,565 297,979 2,152,579 Expenses: Salaries & wages 25,405 221,699 61,773 165,256 474,133 Operating expenses 335,752 3,024 240,696 51,413 145,704 776,589 Interest 10,788 10,788 Depreciation 118,927 283,647 48,041 450,615 Total Expenses 361,157 121,951 746,042 172,015 310,960 1,712,125 Net Income (Loss) 6,428 359,451 57,006 30,550 (12,981) 440,454 Retained Earnings, July 1, 2001 370,080 325,106 576,108 84,838 75,245 1,431,377 Retained Earnings, March31,2002 $ 376,508 $ 684,557 $ 633,114 $ 115,388 $ 62,264 $ 1,871,831 Community Facilities Districts Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2002 CFD 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 98-01 CFD 98-01 Admin Debt Debt Admin Expense Service Service Expense Fund Fund Fund Fund Total Assets: Cash and investments $ 6,881 $ 3,003,456 $ 1,133,613 (3,325) $ 4,140,625 Receivables (4,669) 58,955 16,937 $ 71,223 Total assets $ 2,212 $ 3,062,41l $ 1,150,550 $ (3,325) $ 4,211,848 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Current liabilities $ 3,489 $ 3,062,411 $ 1,150,550 $ (3,325) $ 4,213,125 Total liabilities 3,489 3,062,41 l 1,150,550 (3,325) 4,213,125 Fund balances: Reserved Designated (1,277) (1,277) Total fu nd balances (1,277) (1,277) Total liabilities and fund balances $ 2,212 $ 3,062,411 $ 1,150,550 $ (3,325) $ 4,211,848 Please note that these balances are unaudited. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Community Facilities Districts For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 CFD 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 98-1 CFD 98-1 Admin Debt Debt Admin Expense Service Service Expense Fund Fund Fund Fund Total Revenues: Investment interest $ 662 $ 199,057 $ 55.116 $ 80 $ 254,915 Reimbursements 221 221 Contributions - prop. owner 2,184 Special assessments 793,010 427.526 1,220,536 Total Revenues 883 994.251 482,642 80 1,475,672 Expenditures: Legal services 8,061 8,061 Other outside services 30,300 12,800 43,100 Bond expense 252,350 Debt service - principal 640,000 175,000 815,000 Debt service - interest 875,898 741,509 1,617,407 Total Expenditures 38,361 1,515.898 1,168,859 12,800 2,735,918 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (37,478) $ (521,647) $ (686,217) $ (12,720) $ (1,258,062) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 36,201 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ (I,277) TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAY 28, 2002 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:03 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Pres[dent Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Rober[s, Stone ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 14, 2002. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No comment. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT No comment. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS In response to prior Public Comments discussion, President Stone commended Community Services Director Parker and his staff on efforts associated with allocating swim time to the swim teams at the various pool facilities, reiterating his desire that the Commission/City Council readdress to issue to ensure that the public understands the allocation of this time and the limited number of pool facilities throughout the City. Minutes.csd\052802 1 ADJOURNMENT At $:04 P.M., the Temecu[a Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.csd\052802 2 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for TCSD Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Services PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with PELA, a Landscape Amhitectural Firm, for TCSD landscape plan check and inspection services in the amount of $60,000 and authorize the Board President to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: Since 1993, PELA, a Landscape Architectural Firm, (PELA) has provided landscape plan check and inspection services to the TCSD to augment the Maintenance and Development Services Divisions of the TCSD. These services are necessary to insure that future developer-constructed City parks and landscape maintenance areas are designed and constructed to TCSD standards. Staff is pleased with the services provided by PELA. The current agreement between PELA and the TCSD expires on June 30, 2002. The proposed agreement is for a term of one year with two (2) one-year extensions. These renewals are at the City's sole option. The following agreement provides for plan check and inspection on developer-constructed projects only. Developers pay the TCSD for the necessary landscape and inspection services. In return, all plan check and inspection revenue collected from the development community offsets the costs for services provided under this contract. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no net fiscal impact to the TCSD. The fees paid to the consultant are offset by the plan check and inspection fees paid by the developers. Sufficient appropriations are in the FY 2002-2003 budget in fund 190-180-999-5248 (Parks and Medians) in the amount of $20,000 and in fund 193-180-999-5248 (Slopes) in the amount of $40,000. ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Agreement R:~smithb\Pela\02-03 Staff Report,doc 06/26/01 CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TCSD Parks/Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Services THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 1,2002, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and PELA, a Landscape Architectural Firm ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2002, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2003, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. Contract may be extended by mutual agreement for two (2) one (1) year additional terms. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his Or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Sixty Thousand Dollars and no cents ($60,000.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of Work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi- fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shale give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's ~ compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 p~r accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: One million ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches o! warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Covera<~e. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant .shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance, of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Managf~r or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite, said response. 13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temeoula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Ddve Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Consultant: Pela, a Landscape and Architectural Firm Attention: Mike Elliott 637 Arden Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Mike El~iott shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Mike Elliott may use assistants, · under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Mike Elliott from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the City shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further fome or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. Updated 5/8/02 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeffrey E. Stone, CSD President Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Pete~ CONSULTANT Pela, a Landscape Amhitectural Firm 637 Arden Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 (760) 944-8463 Updated 5/8/02 F~J~IBI~ A Ms. Barbara Smith, Management Analyst CITY OF TEMECULA Community Services Departmem ,~3200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589-9033 RE: City of Temecula, Community Services Depar~nent Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Services Dear Barbara, Per our conversation, I am sending you our proposed scope of services and fees for landscap0 plan check and inspection services for the Temecula Community Services Department for the fiscal year of July 2002 through June 2003. SCOPE OF SERVICES: A. Upon notification from the Temecuh Community Services Department (TCSD) that construction plans are ready for review, PELA will pick up plans at the City. Two sets of plans will be required. B. PELA will review the plans verifying consistency with TCSD standards and specifications, map conditions of approval and CC&R's. One set of plans will be red-lined with comments notifying the applicant of necessary revisions to be made to bring the plans into conformance with TCSD standards. Items not addressed in TCSD standards but that are outside of profession norms will also be marked for explanations from the applicant. C.. PELA will return plans and plan check comments to TCSD within two (2) weeks of receipt of the first submittal; one (1) week for second and third submittals. Plan check comments will also be'provided via e-mall for use by the City. .. D. ~ Once revisions have been resubmitted by the applicant, PELA will re-check the plans for conformance. Should all revisions have been made and all questions answered, the plans will be ready for approval.' If all revisions are not made, one set of plans and the check list will be red-lined again and returned to the applicant a second time for revisions. Tiffs process will continue until the plans are brought into conformance with City standards and professional norms. E. Upon request of TCSD, PELA will review and approve construction cost estimates of proposed improvements in order to determine bonding requirements if required for the project. F. Upon request of TCSD, PELA will attend meetings as required (i.e. pre-design meetings and interim reviews of construction plans with applicants in order to communicate issues with designers, pre-construction meetings, etc.) G. Upon request of TCSD, PI~LA will p~rovide landscape construction inspection services in order to insure implementation is in conformance with the approved plans. A written report will be provided to the proj~t manager after each inspection. ~,ltIBlT 'B FEES: Plan Check Fees: ~[he following fees are based on reviewing a maximum of 3 submittals from tho applicant. Should additional revievts be necessary they will be charged at the rate of $85.00 per sheet. iSOUARE FOOTAOE OF PROJECT FLAT PLAN CHECK FEE 0 - 10,000 $600 (minimum charge) 10,001 - 25,000 $860 25,001 - 100,000 $1,120 100,001 - 13:5,000 $1,380 135,001 - 165,000 $1,620 165,001- 200,000 $1,890 200,001 - 250,000 $2,160 250,001 - 300,000 $'2,430 300,001 - 350,000 $2,700 350,001 - 400,000 $2,970 ............. 400,~_l_& _up $2,970 _+ ._0075 for each sq. fi.. abe~e 400,000 sq. ft. .......... ~_ Plan checks beyond lhe 3'~ Check $85.00/sheet Miscellaneous Meetings: Misc. Meetings FLAT FEE OF $125.00/MEETIH'G & PROJECT l.~ndscape Insp~tion Fees: Landscape Inspection FLAT FEE OF $250.00/VISIT ITEM 3 A P P R O V,~.~./f ,y.------ CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE_,/'"~,~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~)'~. DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDING THE ENERGY CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003. BACKGROUND: Prior to the beginning of each new fiscal year, applications are reviewed regarding the acceptance of residential street lighting, and the inclusion of additional subdivisions into existing TCSD maintenance program. Energy and maintenance costs for residential street lighting is provided through Service Level B. For Fiscal Year 2002-2003, sixteen (16) tracts/areas and the parcels within those tracts/areas will be levied within the Service Level B Rates and Charges at $25.68 per parcel, as follows: Tract No. 24136-00 Tract No. 24183-00 Tract No. 24136-01 Tract No. 24187-01 Tract No. 24136-03 Tract No. 24187-02 Tract No. 04153-00 Tract No. 07402-00 Tract No. 04188-00 Tract No. 08369-00 Tract No. 04457-00 Tract No. 08369-01 Tract No. 06559-00 Tract No. 08369-02 Tract No. 07401-00 Old Town Area FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the aforementioned tracts and the pamels within those tracts into Service Level B has been incorporated into the TCSD budget for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. A'FrACHMENTS: 1. Resolution to accept certain tracts into Service Level B. R:k~mithbXAssessments~02-03 New B Staff&Reso doc 06/11tOl RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDING THE ENERGY CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows: A. The Temecula Community Services District has assumed costs associated with energizing the street lighting within the following residential Tract Nos.: Tract No. 24136-00 Tract No. 24183-00 Tract No. 24136-01 Tract No. 24187-01 Tract No. 24136-03 Tract No. 24187-02 Tract No. 04153-00 Tract No. 07402-00 Tract No. 04188-00 Tract No. 08369-00 Tract No. 04457-00 Tract No. 08369-01 Tract No. 06559-00 Tract No. 08369-02 Tract No. 07401-00 Old Town Area B. The Temecula Community Services District is currently providing residential street lighting services within these subdivisions through Service Level B; and C. The Temecula Community Services District is the authorized legislative body to accept the responsibility of energizing residential street lights within the City of Temecula. Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District hereby accepts the aforementioned residential tracts into the Service Level B rate level for residential street lighting services beginning Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Section 3. The Secretary shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 11th of June 2002. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2002-__ was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the t 1 th day of June 2002, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: ABSTAIN: DIRECTORS: ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT~ CITY MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General ManagedBoard of Directors FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Financ~''/ DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 PREPARED BY: Karen Jes~ssistant Finance Director Pascale E~own, Senior Accountant ¢~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 and approve the following increases: 1. Increase the Debt Service bond proceeds revenue estimate by $3,684,000. 2. Increase the Debt Service Fund appropriation for refunding bonds by $4,010,000. 3. Increase the Debt Service Fund appropriation for cost of issuance by $179,400. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Community Services District for the Nine months ended March 31,2002. Please see the attached financial statements for an analytical review of financial activity. The increase in the revenue and expenditures is primarily due to refinance of the Certificates of Participation(COP). The 1992 COP's were refinanced and the life of the bonds was extended in December 2001 which resulted additional bond proceeds and costs of issuance. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31,2002 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31,2002 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department Temecala Community Services District Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2002 Parks & Service Service Service Recreation Level A Level B Level C Assets: Cash and investments $ 843,122 $ 2 $ 270,129 Receivables 114,710 6,626 15,289 Due from other funds 17,982 Total assets $ 975,814 $ $ 6,628 $ 285,418 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to Other funds $ 17,982 Other currentliabilities $ 104,717 61 $ 42,870 104,717 18,043 42,870 Fund balances: Reserved 337,963 Designated 533,134 (11,415) 242,548 Total fund balances 871,097 (11,415) 242,548 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 975,814 $ $ 6,628 $ 285,41~8 Please note that these balances are unaudited Temecula Community Services District Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2002 Service Service Debt Level D Level R Service Total Assets: Cash and investments $ 140,969 $ 21,153 $ 2,688,343 $ 3,963,718 Receivables 50,563 607 187,795 Due from other funds 17,982 Total assets $ 191,532 $ 21,760 $ 2,688,343 $ 4,169,495 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to Other funds $ 17,982 Other current liabilities $ 229 147,877 229 165,859 Fund balances: Reserved 337,963 Designated i91,303 21,760 2,688,343 3,665,673 Total fund balances 191,303 21,760 2,688,343 4,003,636 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 191,532 $ 21,760 $ 2,688,343 $ 4,169,495 Please note that these balances are unaudited Temecula Community Services District Citywide Operations Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Special tax $ 2,626,000 $ 1,395,312 $ 1,395,312 53% (I) TCSD admin fee cmdiff"REST" 2,117,000 1,587,750 1,587,750 75% Recreation programs 515,000 378,668 378,668 74% Investment interest 40,000 16,106 16,106 40% (2) CSA 143 105,000 Miscellaneous 161,000 78,455 78,455 49% Operating transfer in Total Revenues 5,564,000 3,456,291 3,456,291 62% Expenditures: Parks, medians and arterial street lighting 3,627,040 2,249,142 348,984 2,598, i26 72% Seniors 157,531 109,403 5,118 114,521 73% Community Recreation Center (CRC) 426,830 293,060 21,609 314,669 74% Recreation programs 431,385 259,692 29,854 289,546 67% Temecula Community Center (TCC) 137,850 82,081 5,239 87,320 63% Museum 175,050 99,695 8,813 108,508 62% Aquatics 386,441 185,120 15,493 200,613 52% (3) Sports 170,920 93,320 2,710 96,030 56% (3) Children's Museum 38,000 5,598 1,044 6,642 17% (4) Operating transfers out 430,000 350,718 350,718 82% Total Expenditures 5,981,047 3,727,829 438,864 4,166,693 70% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (417,047) (271,538) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,200I 1,142,635 1,142,635 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 725,588 $ 871,097 Notes: (1) Special tax revenue is primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance in investment interest is primarily due lower cash balance than anticipated (3) The variances am due to seasonal program activity. (4) The variance in children's museum is due early stage in construction and projected position has not been filled yet. Temecula Community Services District Service Level A Arterial Street Lights and Median Maintenance Statement or' Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Special tax Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating Transfers Out $ $ $ 0 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 0 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 0 $ Note: All activity in Service level A is now recorded in the Citywide Operations Fund. Temecula Community Services District Service Level B Residential Street Lights Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Assessments $ 420,000 $ 212,385 $ 212,385 51% (1) Investment interest 2,000 556 556 28% CSA 143 75,000 0 0% Street lighting fees 31,000 10,530 10,530 34% Miscellaneous 12,000 0 0% Total Revenu es 540,000 223,471 223,471 41% Expenditures: Sa]aries & wages 3,370 2,096 2,096 62% Street lighting 596.100 336,436 336,436 56% Miscellaneous 20~000 2,695 2,695 13% Total Expenditures 619,470 341,227 341.227 55% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (79.470) (117,756) Beginning Fund BaLance, July 1, 2000 106,341 106,341 Ending Fund Balance, March 31,2002 $ 26,871 $ (11,415) (1) Special tax revenue is primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. Temecula Community Services District Service Level C Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Assessments $ 985,000 $ 496,140 $ 496,140 50% (1) Investment interest 20,000 5,692 5,692 28% Plan check and inspections 40,000 3,960 3,960 10% Miscellaneous 12,000 0 0% Total Revenues 1,057,000 505,792 505,792 48% Expenditures: Salaries and wages 184,880 97,990 97,990 53% Landscape maintenance and rehab 630,000 353,470 207,731 561,201 89% (2) Utilities 260,000 142,841 142,841 55% Other expenditures 126,500 25,698 52,100 77,798 62% (3) Total Expenditures 1,201,380 619,999 259,831 879,830 73% Revenues Overl(Under) Expenditures (144,380) (114,207) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 356,755 356,755 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 212,375 $ 242,548 (1) Assessments are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance is primarily due to encumbrances that are recorded for landscape maintenance services for the entire year. (3) The variance is primarily due to lower than anticipated slope repair and maintenance costs being incurred. Temecula Community Services District Service Level D Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Assessments $ 3,030,000 $ 1,537,770 $ 1,537,770 51% (l) Grants 15,000 15,471 15,471 103% Investment interest 20,000 3,886 3,886 19% Miscellaneous 5,000 5,000 5,000 100% Total Revenues 3,070,000 1,562,127 1,562,127 51% Expenditures: Salaries and wages 26,240 17,737 17,737 68% Refuse hauling 3,030,330 1,515,508 1,515,508 50% (2) Other expenditures 37,740 27,395 $ 854 28,249 75% Total Expenditures 3,094,310 1,560,640 854 1,561,494 50% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (24,310) 1,487 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 189,816 189,816 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 165,506 $ 191,303 (1) Assessments are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) Refuse hauling payaments are made semi-annually (in January and June). Temecula Community Services District Service Level R Streets and Roads Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Panended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Assessments $ 12,000 $ 6,468 $ 6,468 54% (1) Investment interest 1,000 464 464 46% Total Revenues 13,000 6,932 6,932 53% Expenditures: Emergency street maintenance 17,080 3,360 $ 965 4,325 25% Other expenditures 80 48 48 60% Total Expenditures 17,160 3,408 965 4,373 25% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (4,160) 3,524 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 18,236 18,236 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 14,076 $ 21,760 Notes: (1) Assessments are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. 8 Temecula Community Services District Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended Total Percent Budget Activity of Budget Revenues: Operating transfers in $ 430,000 $ 350,718 82% Bond proceeds 2,770,000 6,454,314 233% (1) Investment interest 35,000 22,477 64% (2) Total Revenues 3,235,000 6,827,509 Expenditures: Debt service - principal 225,000 225,000 100% Debt service- interest 215,500 137,683 64% (3) Cost of issuance 95,000 274,414 289% (1) Payment to refunding bond agent 4,008,254 (1) Operating transfers out 700,000 0% Other expenditures 6,300 5,430 86% Total Expenditures 1,241,800 4,650,781 375% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 1,993,200 2,176,728 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 511,615 511,615 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 2,504,815 $ 2,688,343 Notes: (1) The variance is primarily due to refinance of the 1992 Certificates of Participation. An increased in appropriation in included in this financial statement. (2) The variance is due to semi-annual interest on the reserve fund investment agreement that is paid in October & April each year. (3) Semi-annual debt service paymets are made in October and April each year. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31,2002 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department Temecula Community Services District Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2002 Parks & Service Service Service Recreation Level A Level B Level C Assets: Cash and investtnents $ 843,122 $ 2 $ 270,129 Receivables 114,710 6,626 15,289 Due from other funds 17,982 Total assets $ 975,814 $ $ 6,628 $ 285,418 Liabilities and thnd balances: Liabilities: Due toOther funds $ 17,982 Other current liabilities $ 104,717 61 $ 42,870 104,717 18,043 42,870 Fund balances: Reserved 337,963 Designated 533,134 (11,415) 242,548 Total fund balances 871,097 (11,415) 242,548 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 975,814 $ $ 6,628 $ 285,418 Please note that these balances are unaudited Temecula Community Services District Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2002 Service Service Debt Level D Level R Service Total Assets: Cash and investments $ 140,969 $ 21,153 $ 2,688,343 $ 3,963,718 Receivables 50,563 607 187,795 Due from other funds 17,982 Total assets $ 191,532 $ 21,760 $ 2,688,343 $ 4,169,495 Liabilities and fund baIances: Liabilities: Due to Other funds $ 17,982 Other current liabilities $ 229 147,877 229 165,859 Fund balances: Reserved 337,963 Designated 191,303 21,760 2,688,343 3,665,673 Total fund balances 191,303 21,760 2,688,343 4,003,636 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 191,532 $ 2L760 $ 2,688,343 $ 4,169,495 Please note that these balances are unaudited Temecula Community Services District Citywide Operations Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Special tax $ 2,626,000 $ 1,395,312 $ 1,395,312 53% (1) TCSD admin fee credit/"REST" 2,117,000 1,587,750 1,587,750 75% Recreation programs 515,000 378,668 378,668 74% Investment interest 40,000 16,106 16,106 40% (2) CSA 143 105,000 Miscellaneous 161,000 78.455 78,455 49% Operating transfer in Total Revenues 5,564,000 3,456,291 3,456,291 62% Expenditures: Parks, medians and arterial street lighting 3,627,040 2,249,142 348,984 2,598,126 72% Seniors 157,531 109,403 5,118 114,521 73% Community Recreation Center (CRC) 426,830 293,060 21,609 314,669 74% Recreation programs 431,385 259,692 29,854 289,546 67% Temecula Community Center (TCC) 137,850 82,081 5,239 87,320 63% Museum 175,050 99,695 8,813 108,508 62% Aquatics 386,44l 185,120 15,493 200,613 52% (3) Sports 170,920 93,320 2,710 96,030 56% (3) Children's Museum 38,000 5,598 1,044 6,642 17% (4) Operating transfers out 430,000 350,718 350,718 82% Total Expenditures 5,981,1M7 3,727,829 438,864 4,166,693 70% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (417,047) (271,538) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 1,142,635 1,142,635 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 725,588 $ 871,097 (1) Special tax revenue is primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance in investment interest is primarily due lower cash balance than anticipated (3) The variances are due to seasonal program activity. (4) The variance in children's museum is due early stage in construction and projected position has not been filled yet. Temecula Community Services District Service Level A Arterial Street Lights and Median Maintenance Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Special tax Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating Transfers Out $ $ $ 0 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 0 Ending Fund Balance, March 31,2002 $ 0 $ Note: All activity in Service level A is now recorded in the Citywide Operations Fund, Temecula Community Services District Service Level B Residential Street Lights Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual An~ended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Assessments $ 420,000 $ 212,385 $ 212,385 51% (1) Investment interest 2,000 556 556 28% CSA 143 75,000 0 0% Street lighting fees 31,000 10,530 10,530 34% Miscellaneous 12,000 0 0% Total Revenues 540,000 223,471 223,471 41% Expenditures: Salaries & wages 3,370 2,096 2,096 62% Street lighting 596,100 336,436 336,436 56% Miscellaneous 20,000 2,695 2,695 13% Total Expenditures 619,470 341,227 341,227 55% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (79,470) (117,756) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 106,341 i06,341 Ending Fund Balance, March 31,2002 $ 26,871 $ (11,415) Notes: ( 1 ) Special tax revenue is primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. Temecula Community Services District Service Level C Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Assessments $ 985,000 $ 496,140 $ 496,140 50% (1) Investment interest 20,000 5,692 5,692 28% Plan check and inspections 40,000 3,960 3,960 10% Miscellaneous 12,000 0 0% Total Revenues 1,057,000 505,792 505,792 48% Expenditures: Sa}aries and wages 184,880 97,990 97,990 53% Landscape maintenance and rehab 630,000 353,470 207,731 561,201 89% (2) Utilities 260,000 142,841 142,841 55% Other expenditures 126,500 25,698 52,100 77,798 62% (3) Total Expenditures 1,201,380 619,999 259,83 l 879,830 73% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (144,380) (114,207) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 356,755 356,755 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 212,375 $ 242,548 Notes: (1) Assessments are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance is primarily due to encumbrances that are recorded for landscape maintenance services for the entire year. (3) The variance is primarily due to lower than anticipated slope repair and maintenance costs being incurred. Temecula Community Services District Service Level D Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Bridget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Assessments $ 3,030,000 $ 1,537,770 $ 1,537,770 51% (1) Grants 15,000 15,471 15,471 103 % Investment interest 20,000 3,886 3,886 19% Miscellaneous 5,000 5,000 5,000 100% Total Revenues 3,070,000 1,562,127 1,562,127 51% Expenditures: Salaries and wages 26,240 I7,737 17,737 68% Refuse hauling 3,030,330 1,515,508 1,515,508 50% (2) Other expenditures 37,740 27,395 $ 854 28,249 75% Total Expenditures 3,094,310 1,560,640 854 1,561,494 50% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (24,310) 1,487 Beginning Fund Balance, July I, 2000 189,816 189,816 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 165,506 $ 191,303 Notes: (1) Assessments are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) Refuse hauling payaments are made semi-annually (in January and June). Temecula Community Services District Service Level R Streets and Roads Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Assessments $ 12,000 $ 6,468 $ 6,468 54% (1) h~vestment interest 1,000 464 464 46% Total Revenues 13,000 6,932 6,932 53% Expenditures: Emergency street maintenance I7,080 3,360 $ 965 4,325 25% Other expenditures 80 48 48 60% Total Expenditures 17,160 3,408 965 4,373 25% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (4,160) 3,524 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 18,236 i8,236 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 14,076 $ 21,760 Notes: (1) Assess~nents are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. Temecula Community Services District Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended Total Percent Budget Activity of Budget Revenues: Operating transfers in $ 430,000 $ 350,718 82% Bond proceeds 2,770,000 6,454,314 233% Investment interest 35,000 22,477 64% (1) Total Revenues 3,235,000 6,827,509 Expenditures: Debt service - principal 225,000 225,000 I00% Debt service- interest 215,500 137,683 64% (2) Cost of issuance 95,000 274,414 289% Payment to refunding bond agent 4,008,254 Operating transfers out 700,000 0% Other expenditures 6,300 5,430 86% Total Expenditures 1,241,800 4,650,781 375% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 1,993,200 2,176,728 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 511,615 511,615 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 2,504,815 $ 2,688,343 (1) The variance is due to semi-annual interest on the reserve fund investment agreement that is paid in October & April each year. (2) Semi-annual debt service paymets are made in October and April each year. ITEM 5 APPROV~//~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~'~ ! ' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, AND SERVICE LEVEL D - TRASH AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002- 2003 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and its boundaries are the same as those of the City of Temecula. Property owners pay only for the TCSD services used or made available to their property through separate rates and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A Rates and Charges previously levied bythe TCSD were replaced by the City's Parks/Street Lighting Special Tax, approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. Although the TCSD continues to operate and maintain the parks and recreational facilities through a cooperative agreement with the City, the actual levy budget for the special tax will be considered by the City Council on June 11,2002. As a result, the TCSD is currently comprised of the following four (4) remaining service levels: 1. Service Level B - Residential Street Liqhts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of residential street lighting. 2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscapinq. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. 3. Service Level D - Trash and Recvclinq Collection. Operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program,' and street sweeping services for single family residential homes. 4. Service Level R - Road Maintenance. Operations, construction, and maintenance of streets and roads throughout the City. Service Level "B" includes only those parcels within residential subdivisions that receive street lighting services. The proposed rate of $25.68 per property owner has not been increased from last fiscal year. Service Level "C" includes only those parcels within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance. The seven (7) rate levels for Service Level "C" will not increase from last year. The rate levels are identified as follows: Rate C-1: $ 46.00 Rate C-2: $ 89.00 Rate C-3: $116.00 Rate C-4: $175.00 Rate C-5: $ 70.00 Rate C-6: $225.00 Rate C-7: $129.00 Service Level "D" provides trash, recycling and street sweeping services to all single-family residential properties in the City of Temecula. The proposed rate of $172.56 per property owner has not been increased from last fiscal year. R:Xyasinobk~TCS DLEV Y. 2~O0bod 061300 Service Level "R" includes only those parcels, which receive services for the maintenance of certain unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. The proposed rates for this service level will not increase from last year. The two (2) rate levels for Service Level R are identified as follows: Residential Rate R-1: $115.26 Vacant Rate R-l: $ 57.64 Residential Rate R-2: $121.92 Vacant Rate R-2: $ 60.96 The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. Only those property owners who receive services from a particular service level pay for those services. In summary, the average single-family residence receiving benefit from all service levels will not receive an increase in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD. FISCAL IMPACT: The total Levy Budget for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 is $4,616,762.00. The revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges will fund perimeter landscaping; residential street lighting; trash and recycling collection services; and unpaved road maintenance in the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. CSD 2002-.__ Service Levels B, C, and D. 2. Resolution No. CSD 2002-.__ Service Level R. 3. Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, AND SERVICE LEVEL D - TRASH AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002- 2003 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation ofthe City of Temecula, effective December 1,1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance, service and administration of residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping, and recycling and refuse collection services for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD, and is available for public inspection. Section 4: By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD. Section 5. On June 11,2002, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of such rates and charges. Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonable cost of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and protests and adopts the rates and charges for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping, and trash and recycling collection services for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is tevied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 2002-2003, or claims that an error has been made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates and charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 2, 2002, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or correction of errors program. Section 10. if a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 would create a hardship for that property owner du ring that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 2, 2002, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 9, 2002, the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt there from; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefore. Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resoumes Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD. Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. R:gmithb'~A s se s srt~ at s~02.03 Reso B, C, D & R.doc 06/1Z~01 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 11th day of June 2002. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2002-__ was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 11th day of June, 2002, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: EXHIBIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVELS B, C, AND D On January 1,2002, MuniFinancial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 2002- 2003. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq., the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level, as follows: 1. Service Level B - Residential Street Liclhts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential street lights. 2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscapinq. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. 3. Service Level D - Trash and Recvclinq Services. Operations and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for all single-family residential homes. The Financial Analysis contained herein includes Service Levels B, C, and D with their total levy budgets for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 to be as follows: SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET RATE LEVEL PARCEL CHARGE Service Level B $ 443,622 N/A $ 25.68 Service Level C $ 984,921 C-1 $ 46.00 C-2 $ 89.00 C-3 $116.00 C-4 $175.00 C-5 $ 70.00 C-6 $225.00 C-7 $129.00 Service Level D $3,188,219 $172.56 TOTAL TCSD LEVY FOR SERVICE LEVELS B, C, AND D: $ 4,616,762 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R- ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By previous resolution, the TOSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the maintenance of streets and roads for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD, and is available for public inspection. Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD. Section 5. On June 11,2002, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of such rates and charges. Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" does not exceed the reasonable cost of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and protests and adopts the rates and charges for the road maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2002- 2003 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2002- 2003. Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 2002-2003, or claims that an error has been made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates and charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 2, 2002, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or correction of errors program. Section 10. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 2, 2002, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 9, 2002, the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt there from; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as shown on that roll and to pedorm any and all duties necessary therefore. Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD. Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 11th day of June 2002. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2002- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 11th day of June 2002, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS EXHIBIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVEL R On January 1,2002, MuniFinancial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq., the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those pamels contained within that service level, as follows: Service Level R - Road Maintenance Services. Construction, installation, and maintenance of streets and roads throughout the City. The Financial Analysis contained herein includes the Service Level R total levy budget for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 to be as follows: SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET RATE LEVEL PARCEL CHARGE Service Level R $12,809 R-1 Improved $115.26 R-1 Unimproved $ 57.64 R-2 Improved $121.92 R-2 Unimproved $ 60.96 TOTAL TCSD LEVY FOR SERVICE LEVEL R: $12,809 R:~r~ tbbkA sse s sine nt¢02-03 Reso B, C, D & R.doc CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Fiscal Year 2002~2003 INTENT MEETING: April 23, 2002 PUBLIC HEARING: June 11, 2002 MuniFinancial Corporate Office Regional Offices 28765 Single Oak Drive * San Diego, CA * Jacksonville, FL Suite 200 · Anaheim, CA · Kansas City, MO Temecula, CA 92590 · Lancaster, CA · Phoenix, AZ Tel: (909) 699-3990 · Industry, CA · Seat'de, WA Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) · Oakland, CA · Washington, DC Fax: (909) 699-3460 www.muni.com ~' ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT i · Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the: , · Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) ~ ' City of Temecula ' ' Riverside County, State of California This Report and the information contained therein reflect the proposed budget for each of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District. Dated this /7''lA' dayof /Z:¥~,, ~__ ,2002. MuniFinancial District Engineer .- On Behalf of the City of Temecula and The Temecula Community Services District Jim McGuire Project Manager, District Administration Services TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... l II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ....................................................... 3 A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES ......................................... 3 B. BUDGETAND LEVY SUMMARY ................................................................................. 3 C. DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES .....................................................................5 II1. CHANGES TOTHE DISTRICT ........................................................ lo A. RECENT MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISTRICT (PRIOR TO 2002/2003) ......................... 10 B. MODIFICATIONS OF THE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 ............................. 10 IV.DISTRICT BUDGETS ........................................................................... 13 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .................................................. 16 APPENDIX A m 2002/20003 COLLECTION ROLL ......................... la Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 I. INTRODUCTION Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("District") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the Distdct is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the District. The District collects property-related fees and charges ("Charges") in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The I" District was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the ) · Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code ("CSD Law"). {.' Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the District, any changes to the I '. District and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in I. the Annual Levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and i include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services provided to the parcel. t" The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope protection, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District. , Pursuant to Govemment Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the District has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting (Service Level B), perimeter landscaping (Service Level C), trash/recycling (Service Level D), and road maintenance (Service Level R) services furnished by the District, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. I. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Engineer's Annual Levy Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service Level B, Service Level C, Service Level D and Service Level R Rates and Charges for the parcels and territories within the District. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for Distdct services. MuniFinancial Page 1 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Headng, and review of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Contreller, and included as Charges on the property tax roll for the vadous services provided in Fiscal Year 2002/2003. MuniFinancial Page 2 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 II.PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS A, General Description of the District and Services The boundary of the Distdct is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the City of Temecula. The District provides certain property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate and distinct services referred to as Service Levels. Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the parcel. Each Service Level has diffedng costs depending upon the services provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is provided. Services and improvements provided through the District include residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance and slope protection; a refuse and recycling collection program; and read improvement construction and maintenance. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Residential Street Lighting · Perimeter Landscaping · Trash/Recycling · Road Maintenance B. Budget and Levy Summary Each Service Level provides different and specific services and improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment. t MuniFinancial Page 3 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 C. District Services and Charges Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting -- includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant pamels for which the District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Service Level B Tracts 04153-00 19939-01 21067-00 22203-00 23101-03 23371-06 24184-F 04188-00 19939-02 21082-00 22204-00 23101-04 23371-07 24185-01 04457-00 20079-00 21082-01 22208-00 23101-05 23371-08 24185-02 06559-00 20079-01 21082-02 22593-00 23101-06 23371-09 24186-01 07401-00 20079-02 21082-03 22593-01 23125-00 23371-10 24186-02 07402-00 20079-03 21082-04 22593-02 23125-01 23371-11 24186-03 08369-00 20130-00 21340-00 22627-00 23125-02 23371-14 24186-F 08369-01 20130-01 21340-01 22627-01 23125-03 23483-00 24187-01 08369-02 20130-02 21340-02 22715-00 23126-00 24131-00 24187-02 11087-01 20130-03 21340-03 22715-01 23128-00 24131-01 24188-01 11087-02 20130-04 21340-04 22715-02 23142-00 24131-02 24232-00 12189-01 20130-05 21340-05 22716-00 23143-02 24131-03 25004-01 12189-02 20130-06 21340-06 22716-01 23143-03 24132-00 27827-00 12189-03 20153-00 21340-07 22716-02 23143-04 24132-01 27827-01 12189-04 20154-00 21430-01 22716-03 23173-00 24133-00 27827-02 12189-05 20319-00 21561-00 22716-04 23173-01 24133-01 27827-03 12189-06 20643-00 21672-01 22761-00 23173-02 24133-02 28309-00 12189-07 20644-00 21672-02 22762-00 23173-03 24133-03 26480-00 13060-01 20703-01 21672-03 22786-00 23173-04 24133-04 28482-00 13060-02 20703-02 21672-04 22915-00 23174-01 24133-05 26482-01 13060-03 20703-03 21673-00 22915-01 23174-02 24134-00 28482-02 13060-04 20735-01 21673-01 22915-02 23174-03 24134-01 26482-03 13060-05 20735-02 21673-02 22915-03 23174-04 24134-02 28503-00 13060-06 20735-03 21673-03 22916-00 23174-05 24134-03 28510-00 13060-07 20735-04 21674-00 22916-01 23174-06 24135-00 28510-01 13060-08 20735-05 21674-01 22916-02 23177-00 24135-01 28510-02 18518-00 20735-06 21674-02 22916-03 23220-00 24135-02 28510-03 18518-01 20735-07 21674-03 22962-00 23267-00 24135-03 28526-00 18518-02 20735`08 21675-00 23100-01 23267-01 24136-00 28553-01 18518-03 20735-09 21675-01 23100-02 23267-02 24136-01 28553-F 18583-00 20648-00 21675-02 23100-03 23267-03 24136-03 28810-00 19872-00 20879-00 21675-03 23100-04 23267-04 24182-01 29033-00 19872-01 20879-01 21675-04 23100-05 23371-00 24182-02 29036-00 19872-02 20882-00 21675-05 23100-06 23371-01 24182-03 29286-00 19872-03 20882-01 21675-06 23100-07 23371-02 24182-04 PM 26488 19872-04 20882-02 21760-00 23100-08 23371-03 24183-00 PM 27493 19872-05 20882-03 21765-00 23101-01 23371-04 24183-01 PM 28122 19939-00 20987`00 22148-00 23101-02 23371-05 24184-01 Old Town MuniFinancial Page 5 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping -- includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter f- landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required within these tracts and subdivisions vary depending on operating costs, and therefore seven (7) rate levels have been established within Service Level C. The rate and charges for each of the six service levels in Service Level C are as follows: · The approved rate for C-1 is $ 46.00 and Is currently charged $46.00 · The approved rate for C-2 is $ 89.00 and ~s currently charged $89.00 · The approved rate for C-3 is $116.00 and ~s currently charged $116.00 · The approved rate for C-4 is $175.00 and ~s currently charged $175.00 · The approved rate for C-5 is $ 70.00 and ~s currently charged $70.00 The approved rate for C-6 is $225.00 and ~s currently charged $225.00 The approved rate for C-7 is $129.00 and ~s currently charged $129.00 The current rate and charges for Service Level C is per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Service Level C Tracts I~ Rate Level C-t Tract Name Tract Numbers ' PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT 23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-01 26861-02 26861-03 RANCHO SOLANA 22593-00 22593-01 22593-02 ; THE VINEYARDS 20879-00 20879-01 [~ MONTE VISTA 28309-00 MuniFinancial Page 6 Temecula Community Sen/ices District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Rate Level C-2 Tract Name Tract Numbers MORRISON HOMES 22148-00 RiDGEVIEW 20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 21764-00 27493-PM WINCHESTER CREEK 20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06 21340q:)0 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340-06 21340-07 WOODCREST COUNTRY 21561-00 22205-00 Rate Level C-3 Tract Name Tract Numbers MARTINIQUE 23128-00 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00 SADDLEWOOD 18518-00 18518-01 18518-02 18518-03 VINTAGE HILLS 22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03 22716-04 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01 22916-02 22916-03 28122-PM LENNAR 29286-00 Rate Level C-4 Tract Name Tract Numbers BARCLEY ESTATES 25004-01 MEADOW VIEW 21765-00 SIGNET SERIES 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03 I TRADEWINDS 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03 VILLAGE GROVE 21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21673-01 21673-02 i 21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01 21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06 · CROWNE HILL 23143-02 23143-03 23143-04 I Mt~niFir~ncial Page 7 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Rate Level C-5 Tract Name Tract Numbem TEMEKU HILLS 23371-00 23371-01 23371-02 23371-03 23371-04 23371-05 23371-06 23371-07 23371-08 23371-09 23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 23371-15 28482-00 28482-01 28482-02 28482-03 28526-00 29033-00 Rate Level C-6 Tract Name Tract Numbers WOODSIDE 28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03 Rate Level C-7 Tract Name Tract Numbem VAIL RANCH 23173-00 23173-01 23173-02 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174-02 23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00 28832-00 Service Level D, Trash/Recycling Collection -- provides for the operation and administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District. The current rate and charges for Service Level D is $172.56 per single family residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be applied to all parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes. Pursuant to Proposition 218, the District may increase the rate and charges for this service after conducting an additional protest headng on the matter. Mailed ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level D rates and charges. For Fiscal Year 2001/2002, the Vail Ranch area initially utilized a different Refuse provider than other areas of the City and properties within Service Level D were identified as D-2 (Vail Ranch) and the remainder of the City was identified as D-1. For Fiscal Year 2002/2003, a single service provider will be utilized, and a single service level has been established. MuniFinancial Page 8 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Service Level R, Road Maintenance -- provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the District. The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. All pamels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services provided. The costs associated with the services are proportionately spread among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level R. Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established. Only the pamels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. · Rate Level R-1 --The parcels within this rate level consists of seventy-six (76) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.068 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. · Rate Level R-2 --The parcels within this rate level consists of sixty-five (65) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. MuniFinancial Page 9 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 III. CHANGES TOTHE DISTRICT Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels; or revisions in the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following. A. Recent Modifications to the District (Prior to 2002/2003) On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District. · Community Services, Parks, and Recreation -- that provided for the maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation services within the City. · Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians -- that provided servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting and landscaped medians along arterial streets. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/1998 these two Service Levels were replaced by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District. B. Modifications of the District for Fiscal Year 2002~2003 The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 is related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development are included in these two Service Levels when the Distdct accepts the improvements. Additionally, individual residential parcels are included in Service Level D when a new single family residential unit is identified. l I MuniFinancial Page 10 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Service Level B Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) include 906 residential parcels. The tracts have been divided into two sections to identifY the tracts that are new developments for Fiscal Year 2002/03 and the existing tracts that are subject to Service Level B but not previously charged. The following tracts ara the new developments for Fiscal Year 2002/03: New Tracts Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units 24136-00 87 84 24183-00 79 76 24136-01 103 101 24187-01 92 87 24136-03 79 76 24187-02 82 77 Existina Tracts "Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units 04153-00 65 51 07402-00 36 30 04188-00 66 52 08369-00 38 38 04457-00 61 48 08369-01 54 54 06559-00 38 38 08369-02 57 57 07401-00 27 21 Old Town 16 16 The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service Level B represent the total number of residential parcels and lots within that tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has been approved, in some cases, the actual Assessor's Pamel Numbers (APN's) for each of the individual residential parcels may not have been established by the County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's currently recognized by the County are assigned and charged for the number of residential lots associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's for each of the individual residential parcels and lots are expected to be established by the time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the existing APN's will be charged based on the number of residential lots associated with each APN. Service Level C There are no new tracts to be included in Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes) for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Service Level D MuniFinancial Page 11 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 A total of 915 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and added to Service Level D (Trash/Recycling) for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. New single family residential units are identified each year and included in Service Level D based on updated County Assessor's data, City building permits and the waste hauler's updated service records. The actual cost per household last year for this service was $172.56. For Fiscal Year 2002/2003, the proposed rate and charge is unchanged at $172.56 for actual service costs, as provided in the City's franchise agreement with the contracted waste hauler (CR&R). Service Level R There are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Road Maintenance), proposed for the current fiscal year. However, due to development of two properties within Service Level R-2, the total levy units increased from 44.50 (Fiscal Year 2001/02) to 45.50 (Fiscal Year 2002/03). MuniFinancial Page 12 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 DISTRICT BUDG£T$ The Tables on the next three (3) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year 2OO2/2O03. 2002/2003 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2003 BUDGET ITEM Account Level B Level C Level D Level R Total NO. 192 193 194 t95 Dlntflc~ PERSONNEL SERVICES Sa~ar~s and Wages 5t00 $3,542 $182,827 $28,249 $0 $214,618 Deferred Compensation 5t01 0 0 0 0 0 PERS Retimmer4 5102 0 0 0 0 0 State U nempio~ent 5t03 0 0 0 0 0 Medicare FICA 8104 0 0 0 0 0 Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 0 Life Insurance 5108 0 0 0 0 0 Unemployment Training Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0 Workers Compensation 5112 0 0 0 0 0 Health Insurance 5113 0 0 0 0 0 Mt~ni£inart~ial Page 1:3 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 2002/2003 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2002 No. 192 '193 194 t95 DIstrlc~ OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 2002/2003 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Dopartment Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2003 NO. t92 t93 t94 DIs~ct OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Waste Hsuling 5315 $0 $0 $3,188,219 $0 $3, t88,2t9 Street Lighfir~ 5319 511,300 0 0 0 511,300 insurance 5330 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 5335 0 0 0 0 0 information Systems 5340 0 0 0 0 0 Support Ser~ces 5345 0 0 0 0 0 Facilifle~ 5350 0 0 0 0 0 Assessment Engineering 5370 0 0 0 0 0 City Admin Charges / (Sports 190-183) 5380 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotals (5400's) $0 $604,000 $0 $t7,080 $62t,080 Subtotals (5900's) $0 $0 $0 $0 M. ni£inancial £age 1 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the Distdct will be fairly distributed among each eligible property. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's Distdct charges by the per pamel (residential lot) method. Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Trash/Recycling): Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Pamel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Service Level R (Roads): Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level. PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B Parcel Charge per Parcel Property Type Unit X Parcel [] Charge Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel Single Family Vacant 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel MuniFinancial Page 16 1 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Parcel Charge per Parcel Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier Single Family Residential Rate C-1 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate C-2 1.00 89.00 89.00 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate C-3 1.00 116.00 116.00 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate 0-4 1.00 175.00 175.00 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate C-5 1.00 70.00 70.00 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate C-6 1.00 225.00 225.00 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate C-7 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Parcel X Charge per = Parcel Property Type Unit Parcel Charge Multiplier Single Family Residential Rate D 1.00 $172.56 $172.56 Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R Parcel Charge Parcel Property Type Unit X per Unit = Charge Multiplier Single Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00 $115.26 $115.26 Per Parcel Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50 115.26 57.64 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate R-2 1.00 121.92 121.92 Per Parcel Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50 $121.92 $60.96 Per Parcel t i MuniFinancial Page 17 Temecula Community Services District Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Appendix A -- 2002~2003 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report. I MuniFinancial Page 18 ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY OF F INANf~ ~, _~7~ CITyDIR' MANAGER ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: ~ Shawn D. Nelson, General Manager DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2002-03 Annual Operating Budget PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~A/ Karen Jester, Assistant Finance Dirbc,~:~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS DISCUSSION: The proposed FY 2002-03 TCSD operating budget includes the operation and maintenance of district-wide parks and recreation facilities, debt service on the certificates of participation issued for the construction of the Community Recreation Center, arterial street lighting and traffic signals, and median landscaping. Rates and charges are also established for residential street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency street and road construction and maintenance. Parks and recreation services, as well as artedal street lighting and traffic signals, and median landscaping are primarily funded bythe special tax assessed to properly owners as approved bythe voters as "Measure C" in March 1997. The maximum level of special tax that was approved by the voters is $74.44 per single-family dwelling unit. Over the past three years the special tax rate has been gradually reduced to $63.44 per dwelling unit, with the $11.00 per dwelling unit difference being funded by the City's General Fund through the Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula ("REST") program. The proposed FY 2002-03 budget reflects no change in the existing special tax rate. Residential street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency street and road construction and maintenance services provided by the TCSD are funded primarily by rates and charges assessed to property owners within the District. No changes are proposed in any of the service level rates and charges. On May 29, 2002, the Board of Directors/City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the proposed operating budgets. At that time, the Board of Directors/City Council provided staff with direction to increase the "REST" contribution to the TSCD in an effort to provide increased landscaping along the freeway. This program will provide expanded landscaping and maintenance at various City freeway on/off ramps for an estimated cost of $75,000. As a result, the Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula ("REST") contribution to the Temecula Community Services District has thus been increased by $75,000. The City Council provided additional direction that the TSCD should purchase a new vehicle for the SMART program to be used as a mobile art cart. The additional $30,000 has been added to the Vehicle Internal Service Fund and TCSD City-wide operations reflects an increase of $6,790 for depreciation of the new vehicle. TCSD Revenues Overall, a $2,281,520 (-17.5%) decrease in revenues is projected for TCSD due to the refinance of TCSD Certificates of Participation (COP's) in FY 2001-02. The FY 2002-03 revenue estimates include no change to the special tax rate, or to any of the TCSD assessment rates. The total "REST" program revenue (from the City's General Fund) is proposed to be $2,478,210, a $361,210 increase from the FY 2001-02 amount. The estimated amount of"Measure C" special tax revenues to be collected is $2,689,330, an increase of $63,330 from the FY 2001-02 amount. TCSD Expenditures The proposed Community Services District budget reflects a $385,043 (3.5%) increase in total expenditures from the current year budget. A summary of significant items is as follows: City-wide Operations ~ $175,630 is included for the operation and maintenance of the Children's Museum )' A $75,000 increase is reflected in landscape maintenance to provide additional cleanup and landscaping along the freeway on/off ramps Service Level D ~ $160,210 increase in refuse hauling costs is reflected, due primarily to an increase in the number of parcels served TCSD Fund Balance Surplus fund balance has been used over the past several fiscal years to fund ongoing operations and maintenance costs. The proposed FY 2002-03 budget continues to utilize surplus fund balance, in the following amounts: · City-wide Operations $498,520 · Service Level "B" $ 42,658 · Service Level "C" $127,090 · Service Level "D" $ 5,300 · Service Level "R" $ 4,160 It is anticipated that the actual amount of fund balance required to be used will be less than the amounts reflected above, based on a demonstrated pattern of actual expenditures being less than the budgeted amounts. 2 FISCAL IMPACT: The services provided by the Distdct are funded primarily by the special tax that was approved by the voters as Measure C in March, 1997, the "REST" contribution from the City's General Fund, and the rates and charges assessed to property owners which are to be approved during a public hearing held on June 11,2002. Attachments: Resolution No. CSD 2002- FY 2002-03 Annual Operating Budget RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District has reviewed the proposed final FY 2002-03 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District as follows: Section 1. That the FY 2002-03 TCSD operating budget is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the General Manager. C. The Board of Directors must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. The Board of Directors must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions above the level indicated in the final budget. The General Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. E. The General Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Board of Directors action. F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the General Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Board of Directors action, except that the General Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Board in amounts up to project contingency established by the Board. Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the District books at June 30, 2002 are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2002-03. Section 4. The Board Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of June 2002. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC District Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, do hereby certity that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2002- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of June 2002, by the following vote of the Board of Directors: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC District Secretary/City Clerk PROPOSED OPERATI'NG BUDGET TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 Proposed % 2000-01 YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase Actual @ 3/31/02 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues by Fund: Citywide Operations* 4,871,905 3,456,291 5,564,000 5,928,040 364,040 6.5% Service Level B 371,580 223,471 540,000 494,220 (45,780) -8.5% Service Level C 592,291 505,792 1,057,000 1,048,000 (9,000) -0.9% Service Level D 2,587,963 1,562,127 3,070,000 3,249,220 179,220 5.8% Service Level R 12,748 6,932 13,000 13,000 Debt Service 34,895 6,476,791 2,805,000 35,000 (2,770,000) -98.8% Total Revenues 8,471,382 12,231,404 13,049,000 10,767,480 (2,281,520) -17.5% Total Expenditures by Fund: Citywide Operations* 4,343,420 3,377,111 5,551,047 5,862,060 311,013 5.6% Service Level B 363,314 341,227 619,470 538,880 (80,590) -13.0% Service Level C 636,523 619,999 1,201,380 1,175,090 (26,290) -2.2% Service Level D 2,593,663 1,560,641 3,094,310 3,254,520 160,210 5.2% Service Level R 12,126 3,408 17,160 17,160 Debt Service 497,130 4,650,782 541,800 562,500 20,700 3.8% Total Expenditures 8,446,176 10,553,168 11,025,167 11,410,210 385,043 3.5% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 25,206 1,678,236 2,023,833 (642,730) (2,666,563) Operating Transfers Out*: CIP Fund 105,000 750,000 (750,000) Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out (79,794) 1,678,236 1,273,833 (642,730) (1,916,563) Fund Balances, Beg. of Year 2,405,289 2,325,495 4,199,328 ** Fund Balances, End of Year 2,325,495 3,599,328 3,556,598 * Operating transfers between various TCSD Funds are not reflected. Comparative information reflects amounts previously reported in separate Service Level A Fund ** Projects $600,000 in additional revenues and expenditure savings in FY 01-02 REVENUES BY FUND - COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Actual Actual Estimated Projected FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Parks and Recreation $ 4,457,878 $ 4,871,905 $ 5,564,000 $ 5,928,040 Service Level B 357,922 371,580 540,000 494,220 Service Level C 607,697 592,291 1,057,000 1,048,000 Service Level D 2,337,268 2,587,963 3,070,000 3,249,220 Service Level R 12,593 12,748 13,000 13,000 Deb! Service* 35,344 34,895 2,805,000 35,000 Total $ 7,808,702 $ 8,471,382 $ 13,049,000 $ 10,767,480 *Does not include operating transfers from Parks and Recreation to Debt Service Fund. FOUR YEAR COMPARISON $14- $13.049 $12- $10.769 $7.809 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Actual Actual Estimated Projected I [] Parks and Recreation [] Service Level B [] Service Level C I I [] Service Level D [] Service Level R [] Debt Service* EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY - COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FUNDS Operations Capital Operating Fund Personnel & Maintenance Outlay Transfers Total Parks and Recreation* $ 2,418,290 $ 3,440,270 3,500 $ 5,862,060 Service Level B 4,080 534,800 538,880 Service Level C 211,590 963,500 1,175,090 Service Level D 32,100 3,218,790 3,630 3,254,520 Service Level R 17,160 17,160 Debt Service 562,500 562,500 Total $ 2,666,060 $ 8,737,020 $ 7,130 $ $ 11,410,210~ * Parks and Recreation does not include $562,500 operating transfer to the Debt Service Fund and a $2,000 operating transfer to Service Level B. Servie Level R $1,175,090 ~Service Level B $538,880 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Herman D. Parkee DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Phylli~ Rn~e I SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES Youth & Adult Sports ~ Park Acquisition ~ Park Maintenance Special Events -- Park Development ~ Median Maintenance Volunteer & Cultural Services ~ Assessment Administrati°n ~ Slope Maintenance Teen & Recreational Services ~ Development Plan Review ,.- Facility Maintenance Senior & Human Services ~ Solid Waste Administration ~ Landscape Maintenance Aquatic Program Services ~ Cable Television Administration ~ Plan Check Review Contracted Classes Services ~ Capital Improvement Projects ~ Master Plan Process Review DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES Program: Community Services Funding Source: Special Tax Benefit Assessments General Fund PARKS & RECREATION* Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Expenditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel $ 1,411,302 $ 1,651,866 $ 2,086,447 $ 2,418,290 Operations & Maintenance 2,460,612 2,636,858 3,435,030 3,440,270 Capital Outlay 24,947 54,696 29,570 3,500 Total $ 3,896,861 $ 4,343,420 $ 5,551,047 $ 5,862,060 SERVICE LEVEL B Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Expenditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel $ 73 $ 2,650 3,370 $ 4,080 Operations&Maintenance 324,595 360,664 $ 616,100 534,800 Capital Outlay Total $ 324,668 $ 363,314 $ 619,470 $ 538,880 SERVICE LEVEL C Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Expenditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel $ 101,351 $ 99,805 $ 184,880 $ 211,590 Operations & Maintenance 512,167 536,718 1,016,500 963,500 Capital Outlay Total $ 613,518 $ 636,523 $ 1,201,380 $ 1,175,090 *Does not include operating transfers out. DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES Program: Community Services Funding Source: Special Tax Benefit Assessments General Fund SERVICE LEVEL D Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Expenditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel $ 21,022 $ 22,609 $ 26,240 $ 32,100 Operations and Maintenance 2,323,165 2,565,567 3,063,070 3,218,790 Capital Outlay 5,487 5,000 3,630 $ 2,344,187 $ 2,593,663 $ 3,094,310 $ 3,254,520 SER¥1CE LEVEL R Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Expenditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel Operations and Maintenance $ 11,493 $ 12,126 $ 17,160 $ 17,160 Capital Outlay $ 11,493 $ 12,126 $ 17,160 $ 17,160 DEBT SERVICE Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Expenditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel Operations andMaintenance $ 499,445 $ 497,130 $ 541,800 $ 562,500 Capital Outlay $ 499,445 $ 497,130 $ 541,800 $ 562,500 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES Authorized Authorized PARKS AND RECREATION 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 Director of Community Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Community Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Maintenance Superintendent 0.70 0.00 0.70 Development Services Administrator 0.85 0.00 0.85 Recreation Superintendent 1.00 0.00 1.00 Recreation Services Manager 0.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Supervisor 1.40 0.00 1.40 Management Analyst 0.50 0.00 0.50 Senior Landscape Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 Museum Services Manager 2.00 0.00 2.00 Aquatics Supervisor 1.00 0.00 1.00 Recreation Supervisor 2.00 0.00 2.00 Administrative Secreta~ 1.00 0.00 1.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 1.50 0.00 1.50 Recreation Coordinator 3.00 0.00 3.00 Landscape Inspector 1.25 0.00 1.25 Maintenance Worker 2.50 0.00 2.50 Office Specialist 2.30 0.00 2.30 Custodian 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 24.50 1.00 25.50 SERVICE LEVEL B Management Analyst 0.05 0.00 0.05 SERVICE LEVEL C Maintenance Superintendent 0.05 0.00 0.05 Maintenance Supervisor 0.30 0.00 0.30 Management Analyst 0.30 0.00 0.30 Senior Landscape Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 Landscape Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 Office Specialist 0.30 0.00 0.30 Total 1.95 0.00 1.95 SERVICE LEVEL D Development Services Administrator 0.15 0.00 0.15 M an agement Analyst 0.15 0.00 0.15 Office Specialist 0. l0 0.00 0. ~ 0 Total 0.40 0.00 0.40 Community Services Total 26.90 1.00 27.90 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM: RECREATION SERVICES MISSION: The Recreation Services Program is responsible for providing a comprehensive, Citywide recreation program that meets the recreation and human service needs within the community. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Completed the design ora Teen Council Banner and Summer Concert Series Banner · Completed a mail-in swim registration procedure Completed the Annual Concert Series · Completed the Vail Ranch Dedication and Grand Opening Celebration GOAL 1: INCREASE PARTICIPATION IN TEEN PROGRAMS OBJECTIVES: ~ Promote the Teen Council through the media ~ Develop a Teen Master Plan ~ Develop Teen program exchanges > Re-decorate the Teen Room ~ Develop a Teen Council web page GOAL 2: PLAN, PROGRAM AND IMPLEMENT AQUATIC ACTIVITY AT THE CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL POOL OBJECTIVES: ~ Increase the overall number of aquatic opportunities offered by the City at the Chaparral High School Pool GOAL 3: PLAN, PROGRAM AND IMPLEMENT A DEPARTMENT-WIDE SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM (SCHOLARSHIPS) OBJECTIVES: } Develop a sponsorship policy/procedure } Formally request local non-profit service organizations to provide scholarships for programs } Recognize sponsors for their support GOAL 4: CREATE AND DISTRIBUTE A FACILITY RENTAL BROCHURE OBJECTIVES: } Inform any potential user group of fees, guidelines and responsibilities of facility use } lnform the public of possible rental sites )~ Provide information regarding facility rentals on the City of Temecula's web page ~' Develop a "complete set-up" option for rental parties DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES GOAL 5: INCREASE EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES PROVIDED BY THE TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM OBJECTIVES: ~' Summer Camp Program ~' Provide a traveling "trunk" exhibit } Establish an Annual "History" Fair including Old Town Merchants, RDA, Temecula Valley Performing Arts, schools and vendors GOAL 6: PLAN, PROGRAM AND IMPLEMENT A "YEAR IN REVIEW 2002-2003" VIDEO OBJECTIVES: } Use the video as a marketing tool >' Create Community awareness ~' Track Department/division progress Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of Teen Council Members 12 6 12 30 Number of aquatic programs implemented at Chaparral High School Pool N/A N/A 6 8 Number of sponsorships 2 2 2 4 Number of traveling exhibits at the Temecula Valley Museum N/A N/A N/A 2 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MISSION: The Development Services Program is responsible for park site acquisition and development, assessment engineering, development review, and solid waste and cable television franchise administration. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Completed the Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan · Completed the design of the Children's Museum · Completed the construction of the Senior Center Expansion · Completed the construction of the Chaparral Pool Facility · Completed the 2002 Recycling Calendar · Completed an election information letter for developers · Completed the RFP process for Assessment Engineering · Completed initial data entry for conversion to Permits Plus · Completed the application for the Prop 12 grant funding · Received funding for a tree grant · Received a grant for recycling education (SB 322) · Completed the review process and conditions of approval for the Harveston Project GOAL 1: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE, BALANCED NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE CITY OBJECTIVES: ~ Design and construct basketball court lighting at Vail Ranch Middle School ~' Complete the construction of the Children's Museum } Begin construction of the Sports Park ~ Complete ADA improvements, as funded ~' Complete the improvements at Vail Ranch Park Site "C" } Complete the Master Plan design for Vail Ranch Park Site "D" Coordinate with Public Works to design and begin construction of the trails improvements along Murrieta Creek utilizing the TEA grant ~' Seek grant funding opportunities (i.e. Soccer Grant, Trails Grant, SB 332, CDBG) GOAL 2: INCREASE EFFICIENCY WITHIN THE DIVISION OBJECTIVES: ~ Complete conversion to Permits Plus with written procedures } Implement Work Flow with written procedures } Complete an audit of TCSD's assessment districts } Complete the election process to increase Service Levels B and C DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GOAL 3: PROVIDE THOROUGH REVIEW OF ALL PROPOSED CITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES: ~ Participate in the City's development review process for Specific Plans, Environmental Impact Reports, Tentative Maps, and future park designs ~ Provide appropriate conditions of approval for future development ~' Review future park designs conditioned as part of the large developments Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of capital projects completed N/A 4 3 4 Number or' large developments reviewed and conditioned N/A 0 1 2 Number of recreational marketing techniques Developed N/A 2 3 1 Number of written policies and procedures created N/A 3 3 2 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM: MAINTENANCE SERVICES MISSION: The Maintenance Services Program is responsible for providing effective landscape and facility maintenance services to parks, slopes, medians, recreation facilities and City administrative offices. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Completed Park and Facility rehabilitation and renovation projects including resurfacing &the Pala Community Park Basketball Court, resurfacing o£the Community Recreation Center cabinets and doors, and replacing of split rail fencing at Villages B · Completed the inventory and sa£ety audit of park playground equipment and initiated repairs of noncompliant structures at numerous sites · Redesigned and implemented a Play Structure Inspection and Repair Program which greatly improves playground safety · Assumed the maintenance of the Vail Ranch area and implemented numerous improvements GOAL 1: PROVIDE A SAFE AND ATTRACTIVE FACILITY, PARK, SLOPE AND TRAIL SYSTEM OBJECTIVES: ~ Ensure sites are safe, clean and green at all times ~ Ensure performance compliance of City maintenance contractors and repair contractors ~ Develop priorities for site repairs, renovations and rehabilitation ~ Work closely with the Police Department to monitor problem areas to increase public safety and vandalism response GOAL2: DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT AN EFFECTIVE ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROBRAM/SYSTEM FOR CITY FACILITIES OBJECTIVES: ~ Identify the overall goal of the City of Temecula ~ Identify sites to implement the Energy Management Program ~' Retrofit designated facilities to implement the Energy Management Program } Train staffto ensure effective energy management procedures are utilized GOAL3: UPDATE AND REVISE THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT STANDARD LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SPECIFICIATIONS AND INSTALLATION DETAILS OBJECTIVES: ~ Update landscape and irrigation specifications and installation details ~' Develop and include a section for Standard park Amenities including benches, picnic tables, playground equipment, backstops, fencing, dugouts, etc. Coordinate projects with appropriate consultants and appropriate funding to complete specification and details DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES GOAL 4: SLOPE AREA REHABILITATION PROGRAM TO REHABILATE AGAIN SITES OBJECTIVES: ~ Identify slope areas in need of rehabilitation ~ Outline the required rehabilitation needs of each area identified ~' Prioritize and implement the rehabilitation of each area identified ~ Ensure adequate funding is available to complete rehabilitation projects GOAL5: IMPLEMENT REGULAR DEPARTMENT-WIDE MEETINGS WITH THE MAINTENANCE AND RECREATION DIVISIONS OBJECTIVES: ~' Coordinate monthly department-wide meetings with the Maintenance Division and the Recreation Division Develop Standard Topics for Discussion (i.e. upcoming special events, site and facility conditions, safety issues, planned maintenance, etc.) } Identify Community Services Department Priorities for the month ~ Improve the communication and coordination between division and departments Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Renovation of parks, medians and facilities 4 4 4 4 Rehabilitation of parks, medians and facilities 4 4 4 5 Meet monthly with Police and Public Works Departments regarding vandalism 12 12 12 12 Implement an Energy Management Plan at City facilities N/A N/A N/A 5 Rehabilitate aging slope areas 4 5 5 5 Hold monthly department-wide meetings N/A N/A N/A 12 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM: DEBT SERVICE MISSION: The Debt Service Program provides for the payment of principal, interest, and related costs for the 1992 Certificates of Participation issued for the construction of the Community Recreation Center. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · All debt service and related costs for the 1992 Certificates of Participation (COPs) were made in a timely manner · Refinanced the 1992 COP's resulting in additional proceeds of $2.7 million to be used towards park projects GOAL l: ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS ITEM 7 APPROVAI~./~ CITY ATTORNEY /~'~'//~ . DIRECTOR OF FINANCE__,/(~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services~? DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: AQUATIC SCHEDULE - SUMMER 2002 RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors reviews the Aquatic Program Schedule for the Summer of 2002 and provides Staff with direction as it relates to this season's schedule. DISCUSSION: At the request of Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Stone, this item was placed on the Community Services Commission agenda for discussion at the Commission's Monday, June 10, 2002 meeting. The Community Services Commission reviewed and considered the current aquatic schedule for summer 2002. Plans have been underway for the aquatic schedule for calendar year 2002 since August 2001. With the opening of the CHS Aquatic Facility, there has been increased request and demand for swim programs and use of the facilities. Over the past several years our community need for additional pool time for lap swim programs, swim lessons and public family swim have also increased with our growing community. As a result, staff is indeed pleased to be able to program and open the new Chaparral High School Aquatic Facility. In August 2001, TCSD staff began the process of coordination and planning for the use of three (3) aquatic facilities for public use, high school swim team use and recreational swim team use. As one might imagine, with a new facility coming on line, requests for swim team use has also increased. Staff has taken all of the requests from the two high school swim teams and the two recreational swim teams, and the City's need for expanded public aquatic programs, into account and prepared a schedule of use for these facilities that we wiII present to you tonight. In scheduling these facilities we first consider our charge, which is to address the recreational aquatic needs of the general public. The City's public swim program offers lap swim, learn to swim programs, water aerobics, family night swim, synchronized swimming and public swimming. Secondarily, we consider the request of our two (2) local high school swim programs, which are CIF competitive programs at Temecula Valley High School and Chaparral High School. And third, we consider the request of our two (2) recreational competitive swim programs. Based on rosters submitted to us the Temecula Swim Club has 230 total participants and three (3) coaches. 214 participants are Temecula residents and 16 are non- R:~ZIGLERGXREPORT~061102cc aquatic schedule summer 2002.doc residents. The Inland Gold Aquatics has a total of 32 participants, 2 of which are non- residents. The Temecula Swim Club's summer schedule arovides the following scheduled time of use: CRC Pool Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday ! 5:15 PM to 8:30 PM CHS Pool Monday and Wednesday 5:30 PM to 8:30 PM The Inland Gold Aquatics summer schedule provides the following scheduled time of use: TES Pool Monday, Wednesday, Friday I 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM CHS Pool Tuesday, Thursday t 5:30 PM to 8:30 PM Each day during our summer schedule is itemized to Y2 hour. During the summer schedule, each aquatic facility is scheduled from sunrise to sunset. FISCAL IMPACT: None R:~ZIGLERG~REPOR'I~061102cc aquatic schedule summer 2002.doc REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAY 28, 2002 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:04 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts, Comerchero ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 14, 2002. MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comments. R:\Minutes.rda\051402 1 ADJOURNMENT At $:05 P.M., the Temecu[a Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 11,2002, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:~vlinutes,rda\051402 2 ITEM 2 APPROVAL FC II~ETTDO IP~REE~ToR CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~ DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 PREPARED BY: Karen Jes istant Finance Director Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant I~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members receive and file the Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended Mamh 31,2002. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Redevelopment Agency for the Nine months ended March 31, 2002. Please see the attached financial statements for an analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31,2002 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31,2002. TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31,2002 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Nine Months Ended March 31,2002 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department Temecula Redevelopment Agency Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2002 Low/Mod Redevelopment Debt Fund Fund Service Total Assets: Cash and investments $ 6,719,395 $ 1,707,443 $ 2,233,934 $ 10,660,772 Receivables 1,645,077 336,816 198,486 2,180,379 Land held for resale 2,103,053 2,103,053 Total assets $ 8,364,472 $ 4,147,312 $ 2,432,420 $ 14,944,204 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Other carrent liabilities $ 19,652 $ 343,551 $ 8II,018 $ 1,174,221 Deferred revenue 923,375 157,059 1,080,434 Total liabilities 943,027 500,610 811,018 2,254,655 Fund balances: Reserved 7,421,445 2,429,840 $ 1,621,402 11,472,687 Designated 1,216,862 1,216,862 Total fund balances 7,421,445 3,646,702 1,621,402 12,689,549 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 8,364,472 $ 4,147,312 $ 2,432,420 $ 14,944,204 Please note that these balances are unaudited City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency Low/Moderate Income Housing For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Property tax increment $ 2,084,234 $ 1,073,610 $ 1,073,610 52% (1) Investment interest i65,000 149,508 149,508 91% Rental income 30,000 15,706 15,706 52% (2) Loan Interest 13,735 13,735 Forgiveab]e Loan Repayment 158,403 158,403 (3) Miscellaneous 7,000 394 394 6% Total Revenues 2,286,234 1,411,356 1,411,356 62% Expenditures: Salaries and wages $ 196,310 $ 126,203 126,203 64% Operating and administrative expenditures 297,953 166,693 21,358 188,051 63% (4) Homebuyer programs 200,000 Residential rehabilitation programs 846,664 i55,925 16,645 172,570 20% Housing development & acquisition 5,305,451 32,106 32,106 1% (5) Affordable housing / future obligation 305,000 305,000 305,000 100% Total Expenditures 7,151,378 785,927 38,003 823,930 12% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (4,865,144) 625,429 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 6,796,016 6,796,016 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 1,930,872 $ 7,421,445 (1) Property tax increment revenue Js received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance in rental income is due to Mission Village payment received in April (3) Forgiveable loan repayment revenue is a result of several payoffs due to the terms and conditions of loans that have been breached. (4) The variance in operating and administrative expenditures is primarily due to lower than anticipated legal and consulting costs being incurred. (5) Minimal costs have been incurred to date on the Senior Housing and Pujol Neighborhood Housing projects. City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency- Redevelopment For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Revenues: Investment interest $ 30,000 $ 29,261 $ 29,261 98% (1) Rental income 180,000 135,000 135,000 75% Loan interest 14,000 11,771 i 1,771 84% Reimbursements 125,682 125,682 125,682 100% Miscellaneous 5,660 5,660 Operating transfers in 1,020,375 606,000 606,000 59% Total Revenues 1,370,057 913,374 913,374 67% Capital Projects (4): Public Restrooms Adjacent to O,T. $ 1,223 $ 127 $ 1,096 1,223 100% Fi rst Street bridge 269,347 32,290 155,125 187,415 70% Front Street widening Old Town S. Gateway Landscape 50,000 957 9,933 10,890 22% Old Town central parking lot Operations and Maintenance: Salaries and wages 80,040 56.574 56,574 71% Operating and administrative expenditures 451,I82 167,713 25,375 193,088 43% (2) Owner participation agreements 300,000 (3) Old Town plan implementation 100,980 54,126 26,216 80,342 80% Old Town development incentives 200,000 (4) Old Town building facades 140,545 94,270 27,349 121,619 87% Total Expenditures 1,593,317 406,057 245,094 651,151 41% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (223,260) 507,317 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 3,139,385 3,139,385 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 2,916,125 $ 3,646,702 Notes: (1) The variance in investment interest is due to higher than anticipated cash balances being maintained during the fiscal year, (2) The variance in operating and administrative expenditures is due primarily to lower than anticipating legal, consulting, and other outside services costs being incurred (3) The payment to Costco under the terms of its OPA is not made until the last quarter of the fiscal year. (4) No costs have yet been incurred for providing development incentives in Old Town. City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency - Debt Service For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 Annual Amended YTD Percent Budget Activity of Budget Revenues: Property tax increment $ 8,336,940 $ 4,294,438 52% (1) Investment interest 150,000 142,385 95% Advances from other funds 56,812 Bond Proceeds 4,300,000 Total Revenues 12,786,940 4,493,635 35% Expenditures: Passthrough agreements 5,715,830 3,034,970 53% (2) Debt service - principal 990,000 765,000 77% Debt service - interest 682,140 738,952 108% Miscellaneous 7,500 4,553 61% Operating transfers out 2,808,055 1,106,000 39% (3) Total Expenditures 10,203,525 5,649,475 55% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 2,583,415 (1,155,840) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 2,777,242 2,777,242 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2002 $ 5,360,657 $ 1,621,402 (1) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to Passthrough agreements to be recorded in May (3) The variance is due to several projects in design stage incIuding childrens Museum and the Theater. ITEM 3 AP PROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Q Agency Directors FROM: ~ Shawn D. Nelson, Executive Director DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 200L.2.-~,~nnual Operating Budget PREPARED BY: Genie Robert~xDirector of Finance~"l Karen Jeste~sistant Finance Director RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, RDA 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS DISCUSSION:The Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) consists of three funds, the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Capital Projects Fund, and the Debt Service Fund. RDA Revenues Overall, a $40,144 or .4% increase in total RDA revenue is projected. Gross property tax increment revenue is projected to decrease by $176,174 (-1.7%). This decrease is due mainly to a correction for properties erroneously included in the project area by the County. RDA Expenditures A summary of the significant items included in the proposed budget is as follows: Low/Moderate Income Housincl > A net increase in operating expenditures is proposed, due to the addition of the employee relocation program to assist in recruitment of new businesses in the project area Redevelopment A net decrease in operating expenditures is proposed, due to reductions in Old Town Development Incentives of $100,000 > $75,000 is included for the fa(;ade improvement program > A $35,160 increase is proposed for Old Town Implementation Plan activities Debt Service > A $112,830 decrease is reflected in passthrough agreements as a result of decreased tax increment revenue > Debt service payments have decreased by $658,700 due to the refinance of the RDA Tax Allocation Bonds in May 2002 which resulted in the RDA not having to make a principal payment in FY 2002/2003 FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed RDA operating budget reflects a spending plan that is balanced within projected revenues, and provides resources for various capital improvement projects. Attachments: Resolution No. RDA 02- FY 2002-03 Annual Operating Budget RESOLUTION NO. RDA 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY 2002-03 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the FY 2002-03 RDA operating budget is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the Executive Director. C. The Agency Members must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. The Agency Members must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions above the level indicated in the final budget. The Executive Director may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. E. The Executive Director may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Agency Member action. F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the Executive Director may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Agency Member action, except that the Executive Director may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Agency Members in amounts up to project contingency established by the Agency Members. Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the Agency books at June 30, 2002 are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2002-03. Section 4. The Agency Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula this 11th day of June 2002. Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Agency Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11t~ day of June 2002, by the following vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Agency Secretary/City Clerk PROPOSED OPERATI'NG BUDGET REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FI'SCAL YEAR 2002-03 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 Proposed % 2000-01 YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase Actual L~ 3/31/02 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues by Fund:* Low/Moderate Income Housing 2,272,638 1,411,356 2,286,234 2,482,000 195,766 8.6% Redevelopment 284,304 307,374 349,682 231,000 (118,682) -33.9% Debt Service 7,652,307 4,493,635 8,486,940 8,450,000 (36,940) -0.4% Total Revenues 10,209,249 6,212,365 11,122,856 11,163,000 40,144 0.4% Total Non-CIP Expenditures by Fund*: Low/Moderate Income Housing 355,852 292,897 694,263 835,870 141,607 20.4% Redevelopment 774,708 372,682 1,272,747 1,131,420 ( 141,327) -11.1% Debt Service 7,213,949 4,543,475 7,395,470 6,623,940 (771,530) -10.4% Total Expenditures 8,344,509 5,209,054 9,362,480 8~591,230 (771,250) -8.2% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,864,740 1,003,311 1,760,376 2,571,770 811,394 Other Financing Sources: Deferred Passthreugh/Interest 1,153,119 2,157,000 (2,157,000) Advances from Other Funds 75,749 37,875 Excess of Revenues and Other Financing Sources Over (Under) Expenditures 3,093,608 1,041,186 3,917,376 2,571,770 (1,345,606) * Operating transfer between Debt Service and Redevelopment funds is not reflected REVENUES BY FUND - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Actual Actual Estimated Proposed FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Low/Moderate Income Set Aside $ 1,716,979 $ 2,272,639 $ 2,286,234 $ 2,482,000 Redevelopment* 188,008 284,304 349,682 231,000 Debt Service 7,200,904 8,881,175 8,486,940 8,450,000 Total $ 9,105,891 $ 11,438,118 $ 11,122,856 $ I 1,163,000 *Does not include operating transfers from Debt Service Fund. FOUR VEAR COMPARISON $13a $9.106 $9- $?- $5- $1~ FY 1999410 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Actual Actual Estimated Proposed · Debt Service I I [] Redevelopment* [] Low/Moderate Income Set Aside EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS Operations Capital Operating Fund Personnel & Maintenance Outlay Transfers Total Low/Moderate Income SetAside $ 229,360 $ 606,510 $ $ 835,870 Redevelopment 92,780 1,038,640 I, 131,420 Debt Service* 6,623,940 6,623,940 Total $ 322,140 $ 8,269,090 $ $ $ 8,591,230 *Debt Service does not include $ 620,000 operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund. Income Set Aside.ri. % ~ Redevelopment $835,870 % - :~Debt Servlee j $6,623,940 DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DIRECTOR OF HOUSING/REDEVELOPMENT John Meyer I I I Temecula O.N.E. ~ Capital Projects First Time Homebuyer -- Old Town Specific Plan Residential Improvement Implementation Programs ~ Old Town Advisory Committee Land Acquisition --. Community Liaison Affordable Housing Project Development DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Program: Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside Funding Source: Tax Increment Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Expenditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel $ 196,712 $ 167,098 $ 196,310 $ 229,360 Operations and Maintenance 213,102 188,707 492,953 606,510 Capital Outlay 805 47 5,000 $ 410,619 $ 355,852 $ 694,263 $ 835,870 Program: Redevelopment Funding Source: Tax Increment Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Exl~enditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel $ 76,245 $ 72,419 $ 80,040 $ 92,780 Operations and Maintenance 478,038 702,242 1,187,707 1,038,640 Capital Outlay 8,884 47 5,000 $ 563,167 $ 774,708 $ 1,272,747 $ 1,131,420 Program: Debt Service* Funding Source: Tax Increment Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed Exl~enditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel Operations and Maintenance $ 5,814,047 $ 7,213,950 $ 7,395,470 $ 6,623,940 Capital Outlay $ 5,814,047 $ 7,213,950 $ 7,395,470 $ 6,623,940 *Does not include operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund. DEPARTMENT:REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY Authorized Authorized LOW/MOD HOUSING 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 Director of Housing/Redevelopment 0.75 0.00 0.75 Senior Management Analyst 0.75 0.00 0.75 Administrative Secretary 0.50 0.00 0.50 2.00 0.00 2.00 REDEVELOPMENT Director of Housing/Redevelopment 0.25 0.00 0.25 Senior Management Analyst 0.25 0.00 0.25 Administrative Secretary 0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 0.00 1.00 Redevelopment Agency Total 3.00 0.00 3.00 DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROGRAM: HOUSING MISSION: The Housing Program is responsible for developing, rehabilitating, and preserving affordable housing opportunities. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Revised First Time Homebuyer Program allowing buyers up to 120% of median income to qualify · Funded 55 residential improvements, consisting o£painting, roofing and fencing repairs · Completed negotiation on a 17 unit single-family affordable housing program GOAL 1: PROVIDE QUAL1TY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW AND MODERATE 1NCOME FAMILIES AND TO EXPAND THEIR AVAILABILITY OBJECTIVES: ~ Ensure compliance with State Redevelopment Law ~' Monitor existing affordable housing covenants ~ Administer the First Time Homebuyer and Employee Relocation Programs ~ Administer the Residential Improvement Program ~ Acquire land and develop projects to support new affordable housing opportunities W Encourage private investment in the expansion of affordable housing ~ Partner with non-profit and for-profit developers to construct affordable family and senior housing Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of additional affordable housing units provided 8 0 0 17 Number of affordable housing units rehabilitated 55 55 55 55 Number of first time homebuyers assisted 6 1 2 4 Number of employee relocation homebuyers assisted 5 0 5 4 Number of specialized homebuyer programs N/A N/A 4 4 DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROGRAM: REDEVELOPMENT MISSION: The Redevelopment Program is responsible for encouraging private investment, removing blight, and promoting economic revitalization in the redevelopment project area. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: ·Continued implementation of the Old Town Improvement Program Funded 15 Facade Improvement projects · Assisted the Community Services Department in the renovation of the Old Town Trading Post for the Children's museum · Selected an architect and managed schematic design and master site plan of Old Town Community Theater · Completed the design, development, and construction drawings for the Old Town Community Theater GOAL i: IMPLEMENT THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN OBJECTIVES: ~ Work with Old Town merchants, property owners, civic groups and the development community to make private and public improvements in Old Town, develop projects that will revitalize Old Town economy, and assist in the private rehabilitation of buildings in Old Town ~ Promote and encourage participation in the Facade Improvement Program ~ Recruit new businesses to open in Old Town Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of facade improvement projects completed 8 25 15 15 Number of historical structures assisted 2 0 I 1 Number of redevelopment projects negotiated and completed 2 0 2 2 DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROGRAM: DEBT SERVICE MISSION: The Debt Service Program is the operating budget for the Redevelopment Agency. Items budgeted include debt service principal and interest, property tax administrative fees, and pass through agreements. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · All debt service and related costs for the Tax Allocation Bonds (TABs) were made in a timely manner · l~efinanced the 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds resulting in additional net proceeds to fund additional capital projects · Renegotiated the RDA passthrough agreement with the County of Riverside which resulted in the elimination or'the deferred passthrough in excess o~'$8 million with a lump sum payment of $6 million made possible by the refinance o£the 1993 TABs GOAL 1: ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANC~== CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: /,~ Agency Directors FROM: ~Shawn D. Nelson, Executive Director DATE: June 11,2002 SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2003-07 Capital Improvement Budget for the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~ ,,,,~,~ Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manage~r,~Y,,r'~ RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2003-07 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2002-03. DISCUSSION: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the City's plan for providing public improvements which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long-term rife spans, and are nonrecurring. The proposed CIP document serves as a planning tool for the coordination of financing and scheduling of all capital improvement projects over the next five years. On May 29, 2002 the City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the draft ClP. At the workshop the City Council provided direction to staff. Council requested staff to evaluate the easement area along Old Town Front Street to expand the boardwalk landscaping to the Southern Gateway Landscape Project and this investigation is underway. COSTS The total Redevelopment Agency cost as identified in the CIP is $23,366,186 which includes five (5) RDA projects and six (6) RDA Housing Projects. A total cost of $18,146,186 is programmed in FY 2002-03 CIP. REVENUE Projected revenue from the RDA and RDA Housing sources for the Five Year RDA Capital ! Improvement Program is $24,074,097. Through the five year program, there is adequate funding for all proposed projects. However because of revenue and cost timing considerations there are three (3) projects that do not have funding sources identified. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 2003-07 Five Year Capital Improvement Program establishes the project appropriations for FY 2002-03. Projects which do not have sufficient funds within the funding source will not proceed until the funding has been secured. Attachments: Resolution No. RDA 2002- FY 2003-07 Capital Improvement Program RESOLUTION NO. RDA 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2003-07 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2002-03. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed FY 2003-07 Capital Improvement Program and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adopting the Capital Improvement Budget for FY 2002-03. WHEREAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements is necessary so as to best serve the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, in order to prioritize these public infrastructure and improvements, Capital Improvement Program is necessary; NOW, THEREFORE, TIlE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program FY 2003-07 is hereby approved. A copy of the FY 2003-07 Program is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and will be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City Council has considered relevant environmental factors. Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 2003-07" included herein appropriations for FY 2003-07 is hereby adopted. The CIP appropriations for the 2001-2002 Fiscal Year which have not been completed, encumbered nor included in the FY 2003-2007 ClP are hereby carried over for each applicable project to the Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Section 4. On May 15, 2002 the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65404(c) of State Planning and Zoning Law. Section 5. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Board of Directors action. C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Redevelopment Agency contracts in amounts up to $25,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available. D. That the City Manager may authorize transfers of up to $25,000 between approved Capital Improvement Program projects. E. Notwithstanding Section 5B, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Redevelopment Agency contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Redevelopment Agency funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Redevelopment Agency contracts approved by the Board of Directors in amounts up to project contingency established by Board of Directors. Section 6. Councilmember Stone abstains with respect to projects within the Old Town area due to property ownership in Old Town Temecula. Section ?. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11~h day of June 2002. Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CiTY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of June, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk ITEM 18 APPROVAL CITY OF FINANC~ ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: (.~ City Council FROM: ~;~hawn Nelson, City Manager DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2002-03 Annual Operating Budget PREPARED BY: Genie Robert~:..Director of Finance~/~- Karen Jest,~ssistant Finance Director RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 3. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 2002-03 DISCUSSION: Attached is the proposed FY 2002-03 Annual Operating Budget. The budget includes revenue projections and expenditure requests for the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, State Transportation Fund, Law Enfomement Grant Fund, Internal Service Funds and Community Development Block Grant Fund. The City of Temecula remains in a healthy financial condition. Based upon the Finance Department's revised estimate of revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year, it appears that most revenue estimates will be met or exceeded, and that actual expenditures will be less than the budgeted appropriation amounts for an estimated total savings of $1,900,000. On May 29, 2002, the City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the proposed operating budgets. At that time, the City Council provided staff with direction to increase the City Council conference line item by $5,500 and to increase the "REST" contribution to the TSCD in an effort to provide increased landscaping along the freeway. This program will provide expanded landscaping and maintenance at various City freeway on/off ramps for an estimated cost of $75,000. As a result, the Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula ("REST") contribution to the Temecula Community Services District has been increased by $75,000. In addition to the increase in the "REST" contribution, the City Council provided direction to staff to increase the operating transfer to capital reserves by $130,000 for median design work on Winchester Road ($100,000) and for a City Beautification program ($30,000). The City Council provided additional direction that the TSCD should purchase a new vehicle for the SMART program to be used as a mobile art cart. The additional $30,000 has been added to the Vehicle Internal Service Fund and TCSD City-wide operations reflects an increase of $6,790 for depreciation of the new vehicle. General Fund Revenues The projected General Fund revenues for FY 2002-03 total $37,746,820, which is a $3,129,020 or 9% increase from the FY 2001-02 revenue estimates. Some of the significant revenue increases are summarized below: $2,030,000 increase in sales tax (to $19,700,000) $418,000 increase in transient occupancy taxes due primarily to the addition of rooms associated with the opening of a new hotel and the expansion of an existing hotel $307,300 increase in motor vehicle in lieu revenue due mainly to population increases $278,000 increase in franchise fees due mainly to population increases $110,000 increase in property taxes due to increases in assessed valuations General Fund Exl~enditures The proposed budget of $36,890,295 reflects an increase in General Fund expenditures of $2,457,141 or 7.1% from the FY 2001-02 budget. The primary increases affecting the General Fund include: 1 ) police contract costs due to the addition of five sworn positions, with one additional sworn support positions being added through the contract rate for a total increase of 6 sworn positions, 2) an increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement due to strong retail sales growth within the district, and 3) an increase in the Revenue Excess Sharing in Temecula ("REST") contribution to the TCSD. Personnel costs increases that impact the budget include: 1) the implementation of the salary survey for all regular authorized positions (per the City's newly negotiated labor agreement), 2) the increase of $50 in the benefit allowance to $700 per month effective January 1,2003 for all regular authorized positions per the City's new labor agreement, 3) an increase of $100 per month in the auto allowance for City Councilmembers and Executive Staff to $400 per month per the management 2 compensation plan, and 4) a cost of living increase of three percent. Nine new positions are proposed to be added to the schedule of authorized positions. The total annual cost of these positions is approximately $769,900, however based on a recruitment schedule the actual amounts included in the budget total $532,200. A summary of these positions is as follows: Department Position PW-Land Dev Special Projects Associate Engineer PW-Land Dev Senior Public Works Inspector (NPDES) PW-Land Dev Associate Engineer (NPDES) PW-Land Dev Junior Engineer PW-CIP Admin Property Agent PW-CIP Admin Office Specialist TCSD Recreation Services Manager Information Systems Information Systems Manager Planning Senior Planner The City currently staffs a number of positions with temporary/project staffing. The proposed budget includes a request for the conversion of 16 project positions to permanent full-time equivalent ("fie") positions. The total annual cost of these conversions is approximately $63,000 when comparing annual project costs versus permanent costs. Department Position City Clerk Minute Clerk City Clerk Office Specialist Finance Revenue Manager Finance Accounting Assistant Planning Associate Planner (2) Planning Office Specialist Planning Office Assistant Building & Safety Building Inspector II (2) Building & Safety Office Assistant PW-Land Dev Engineering Tech III PW-Land Dev/CIP Admin Public Works Inspector PW-CIP Admin Senior Engineer Fire Office Specialist Facilities Custodian Four position reclassifications are proposed, the total annual incremental cost of $51,400 is projected for the Planning Department position upgrades along with these reclasses the two senior planner positions and senior management analyst position will be deleted. A summary of the proposed position upgrades is as follows: Dept. Proposed Position Current Position City Manager Assistant to the City Managed Assistant to the City Manager HR Director Planning Principal Planner (2) Senior Planner (2) Planning Principal Planner Senior Management Analyst Two promotions opportunities are included in this year's budget. Therefore, two principle engineer positions have been added and a senior engineer and a project assistant engineer position have 3 been deleted. These promotions are required to complete the reorganization proposed in Public Works. The proposed budget continues the City's practice of relying on project or temporary help to meet short-term needs. Included in the proposed budget is approximately $817,560 in project and temporary help costs, which represents 7.79% of the City's total General Fund personnel cost budget. The project cost associated with the TCSD is approximately 520,040, which represents 20% of the total TCSD personnel budget. Following is a summary of the significant items by department in the FY 2002-03 proposed budget: City Council ~ Includes $25,000 funding for 50% of the CETAP planning grant request from WRCOG City Manacler ~ Includes $36,000 funding to hire a federal lobbyist > Includes $36,000 funding for a state lobbyist Finance ~ Includes $35,000 funding for a User Fee study ~ Includes $50,000 funding for a Development Impact Fee study Planning ~ Reflects a separate line-item budget for Code Enforcement activities ~ Reflects a significant reduction in consulting services due to the prior year award of the General Plan contract Police ~ The following modifications are proposed to sworn staffing levels, maintaining the City's ratio of one sworn officer per thousand residents: · Addition of two patrol officers · Addition of two motorcycle officer for the Neighborhood Enforcement Team · Addition of one narcotics task force officer · Addition of one sergeant as part of the sworn support built into the contract rate ~ The City's ratio of one sworn officer per thousand residents will be maintained > Includes continued funding to support the Community Action Patrol ("CAP") program which would utilize citizen volunteers to perform certain functions ~ Includes $108,000 in support costs for various special events Fire $544,000 increase in Fire Services contract costs due to the addition of a paramedic team A $68,000 increase in Fire Services contract costs is reflected, due to the addition of a Fire Safety Specialist ~ $280,000 increase for a full year staffing of Fire Station 92 (Vail Ranch Interim Station) Non-Departmental ~ A $207,000 increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement is included due to continued retail development within the district ~ The ~'REST" program contribution to the TCSD is proposed to be increased from $2,117,000 to $2,476,210 Operatinq Transfers Out 4 $2,130,000 transfer to the Capital Improvement Program is proposed INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Following is a discussion of significant items in the proposed Internal Service Fund budgets: Insurance > No significant changes Vehicles > Four replacement and three new additional vehicle purchases are proposed as follows: Replacement: · Building & Safety: new full size truck for an Inspector, projected cost $25,000 · Public Works: new SUV for Land Development for an Inspector, projected cost $35,000 · Public Works: replace chassis and rehab stencil truck, projected cost $22,500 · TCSD: replacement midsize 4wd truck for maintenance staff, projected cost $24,000 New: · Fire: new medic squad, projected cost $110,000 to serve as a reserve squad · Fire: new truck for an inspector and reserve chief officer, projected cost $33,000 · TCSD: new transportation van for recreation staff, projected cost $35,000 · TCSD: new vehicle for mobile art cart for SMART program, projected cost $30,000 Information Systems > Increased depreciation costs $69,000 Support Services > No significant changes Facilities > No significant changes "Gann" Appropriations Limit In accordance with Government Code Section 7910, the City Council is required on an annual basis to adopt by resolution the "Gann" Appropriations Limit. The Appropriations Limit creates a restriction on the amount of revenue that can be appropriated in any fiscal year. The Limit is increased each year based on the growth of population, inflation, and non-residential assessed valuation Using population data provided by the State Department of Finance, and assessed valuation information provided by the City's property tax consultant HdL, Coren & Cone, the City's Appropriations Limit for FY 2002-03 has been computed to be $53,472,848. Appropriations subject to the limit in the proposed FY 2002-03 budget total $28,586,128, which is $24,886,720 less than the computed limit. Additional appropriations to the budget funded by non-tax sources such as service charges, restricted revenues from other agencies, grants, or beginning fund balances would be unaffected by the Appropriations Limit. However, any supplemental appropriations funded through increased tax sources could not exceed the $24,886,720 variance indicated above. Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources greater than $24,886,720 from the budget estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations Limit, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years, or voter approval to increase the City's Appropriations Limit. 5 FISCAL IMPACT: Due to anticipated additional revenues to be received and expenditure savings in the current fiscal year, it is estimated that the June 30, 2002 fund balance will be approximately $1,900,000 higher than originally expected. The proposed FY 2002-03 General Fund operating budget is a balanced budget that provides for an excess of General Fund revenues over operating expenditures of $856,525 (before operating transfers), and provides $2 million to be transferred to the Capital Improvement Program. The proposed budget provides fora $10 million designation for economic uncertainties and additionally designates funds for open space acquisition and retiree health benefits. These designations represent 30% of General Fund expenditures at June 30, 2003. Attachments: -Resolution No. 02- -Resolution No. 02- -Resolution No. 02- -FY 2002-03 Proposed Annual Operating Budget RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2002-03 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY 2002-03 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula FY 2002-03 Annual Operating Budget" is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the City Manager. C. The City Council must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. The City Council must authorize any changes to the Schedule of Authorized Positions. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. E. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action. F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by Council. Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at June 30, 2002 are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2002-03. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11~h day of June 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 02-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of June, 2002, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.12.030 of the City's Municipal Code, the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies: and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt the Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. The attached Schedule of Authorized Positions (Exhibit A) is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Govemment Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective July 1,2002, and may be thereafter amended. Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized Positions and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's personnel policies. Section 4. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of June 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula th at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11 day of June 2002, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNClLMEMBERS: NOES: COUNClLMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNClLMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk KHX IB]]T A City of Temecula Schedule of Authorized Positions FINAL Authorized Exempt/ Count Minimum Maximum Nonexempt Buildincl &Safetv Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Building Inspector II 7.0 $3,432 $4,393 NE Community Development Technician 4.0 $2,839 $3,633 NE Deputy Building Official 1.0 $5,162 $6,607 E Director of Building & Safety 1.0 $6,452 $8,258 E Office Assistant 2.0 $1,903 $2,437 NE Office Specialist 1.0 $2,052 $2,628 NE Plan Checker/Building Insp. 1.0 $3,714 $4,755 NE Senior Building Inspector 1.0 $4,093 $5,240 E Building & Safety Subtotals: 19.0 City Clerk Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Central Services Coordinator 1.0 $2,336 $2,989 NE City Clerk/Director Of Support Services 1.0 $6,452 $8,258 E Deputy Director Of Support Services 1.0 $4,963 $6,352 E Information Systems Administrator 1.0 $4,233 $5,419 E Information Systems Manager 1.0 $6,003 $7,685 E Information Systems Specialist 2.0 $3,642 $4,662 E Minute Clerk 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Office Assistant 1.5 $1,903 $2,437 NE Office Specialist 2.0 $2,052 $2,628 NE Records Coordinator 1.0 $2,689 $3,442 NE Web Analyst 1.0 $3,385 $4,334 NE City Clerk Subtotals: 14.50 Citv Council City Council 5.0 $0 $760** E City Council Subtotals: 5.0 City Mana(~er Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Assistant City Manager 1.0 $8,728 $11,173 E Asst. To The City Manager/HR Director 1.0 $6,452 $8,258 E City Manager 1.0 *** $10,261 E Executive Assistant 1.0 $3,898 $4,605 E Human Resources Analyst 1.0 $3,956 $5,066 E Human Resources Specialist 1.0 $3,218 $4,119 E Marketing Coordinator 1.0 $4,355 $5,574 E Senior Management Analyst 1.0 $4,811 $6,156 E City Manager Subtotals: 9.0 Updated on 6/6/2002 Page 1 City of Temecula Schedule of Authorized Positions FINAL Authorized Exempt/ Count Minimum Maximum Nonexempt Communitv Services Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Aquatics Supervisor 1.0 $3,374 $4,318 NE Custodian 2.0 $2,037 $2,609 NE Deputy Dir. Of Comm. Svcs. 1.0 $6,173 $7,901 E Development Services Administrator 1.0 $5,194 $6,648 E Director Of Community Services 1.0 $7,704 $9,862 E Facility Maintenance Coordinator 1.0 $2,810 $3,599 NE Landscape inspector 2.0 $2,889 $3,699 NE Lead Maintenance Worker 2.0 $2,850 $3,650 NE Maintenance Superintendent 1.0 $4,907 $6,281 E Maintenance Supervisor 1.0 $3,993 $5,112 E Maintenance Worker 3.0 $2,422 $3,102 NE Management Analyst 1.0 $4,355 $5,574 E Museum Services Manager 2.0 $3,469 $4,441 NE Office Specialist 3.0 $2,052 $2,628 NE Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor 1.0 $3,993 $5,112 E Recreation Coordinator 3.0 $2,754 $3,526 NE Recreation Services Manager 1.0 $4,401 $5,635 E Recreation Superintendent 1.0 $5,180 $6,630 E Recreation Supervisor 2.0 $3,374 $4,318 NE Senior Landscape Inspector 1.0 $3,323 $4,253 NE Community Services Subtotals: 32.0 Finance Accountant 1.0 $3,503 $4,485 NE Accounting Assistant 2.0 $2,265 $2,900 NE Accounting Specialist 3.0 $2,619 $3,353 NE Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Assistant Finance Director 1.0 $6,118 $7,832 E Business License Specialist/Cashier 1.0 $2,342 $2,999 NE Director Of Finance 1.0 $7,704 $9,862 E Fiscal Services Manager 1.0 $5,371 $6,877 E Purchasing Specialist 1.0 $2,619 $3,353 NE Revenue Manager 1.0 $4,811 $6,156 E Senior Accountant 1.0 $4,473 $5,725 E Finance Subtotals: 14.0 Fire Office Specialist 1.0 $2,052 $2,628 NE Fire Subtotals: 1.9 Updated on 6/6/2002 Page 2 City of Temecula Schedule of Authorized Positions FINAL Authorized Exempt/ Count Minimum Maximum Nonexempt Planninq Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Assistant Planner 1.0 $3,523 $4,510 NE Associate Planner 6.0 $3,993 $5,113 NE Code Enforcement Officer I 2.0 $3,289 $4,210 NE Code Enforcement Officer II 1.0 $3,618 $4,631 NE Deputy City Manager 1.0 $8,636 $11,055 E Development Processing Coordinator 1.0 $3,620 $4,633 NE Director of Planning 1.0 $7,146 $9,147 E GIS Administrator 1.0 $4,444 $5,690 E GIS Analyst 1.0 $3,385 $4,334 NE Office Assistant 2.0 $1,903 $2,437 NE Office Specialist 2.0 $2,052 $2,628 NE Principal Planner 3.0 $5,802 $7,426 E Senior Planner 1.0 $5,045 $6,458 E Planning Subtotals: 24,0 Public Works Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Assistant Engineer 7.0 $3,940 $5,042 NE Associate Engineer 7.0 $4,627 $5,926 E CIP Specialist 0.75 $3,127 $4,002 NE Deputy Director Public Works 1.0 $6,909 $8,843 E Director Of Public Works/City Engineer 1.0 $8,636 $11,055 E Engineering Technician 1.0 $2,661 $3,406 NE Junior Engineer 1.0 $3,060 $3,917 NE Lead Maintenance Worker 4.0 $2,850 $3,650 NE Maintenance Superintendent 1.0 $4,907 $6,281 E Maintenance Supervisor 1.0 $3,993 $5,112 E Maintenance Worker 5.0 $2,422 $3,102 NE Management Analyst 1.0 $4,355 $5,574 E Office Assistant 2.0 $1,903 $2,437 NE Office Specialist 3.0 $2,052 $2,628 NE Principal Engineer 3.0 $6,219 $7,959 E Property Agent 1.0 $4,627 $5,926 E Public Works Inspector 2.0 $3,460 $4,429 NE Senior Engineer 3.0 $5,460 $6,988 E Senior Public Works Inspector 4.0 $3,979 $5,093 NE Special Projects Engineer 1.0 $4,627 $5,926 E Public Works Subtotals: 50.75 Updated on 6/612002 Page 3 City of Temecula Schedule of Authorized Positions FINAL Authorized Exempt/ Count Minimum Maximum Nonexempt Redevelopment Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,722 $3,484 NE Director of Housing & Redevelopment 1.0 $7,146 $9,147 E Management Analyst 1.0 $4,355 $5,574 E Redevelopment Subtotals: 3,0 Totals: Building & Safety ................................. 19.0 City Clerk ........................................... 14.50 City Council ........................................ 5.0 City Manager ....................................... 9.0 Community Services ............................. 32.0 Finance .............................................. 14.0 Fire .............................................. 1.0 Planning ............................................. 24.0 Public Works ...................................... 50.75 Redevelopment ....................................3.0 Total of Authorized Positions: 172.25 Updated on 6/6/2002 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 2002-03 WHEREAS, the voters approved the Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative (Proposition 4) on November 6, 1979, adding Article XIII B to the Constitution of the State of California to establish and define annual appropriation limits on state and local governmental entities; WHEREAS, SB 1352 provides for the implementation of Article XIII B by defining various terms used in this article and prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific provisions of the article, including the establishment by resolution each year by the governing body of each local jurisdiction of its appropriations limits; WHEREAS, the required computations to determine the Appropriations Limit for FY 2002-03 have been performed by the Finance Department and are on file with the office of the City Clerk, and available for public review; WHEREAS, these computations are provided on Exhibit "A~ which is herein incorporated by reference and attached hereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. The Apprepdations Limit for the City of Temecula for FY 2002-03 is hereby adopted. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11" day of June 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11"~ day of June, 2002, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNClLMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNClLMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA COMPUTATION OF GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FY 1992-93 Appropriations Limit ................................................................................ $10,109,911 FY 1993-94 Population Change* .......................................................................................... 8.25% FY 1993-94 Per Capita Personal Income Change* .............................................................. 2.72% Cumulative Compound (1.0825 x 1.0272) .......................................................................... 11.19% FY 1993-94 Appropriations Limit ................................................................................ $11,241,655 FY 1994-95 Population Change*. ........................................................................................... 8.15% FY 1994-95 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** ............................................ 21.7% Cumulative Compound (1.0815 x 1.2170) ............................................................................ 31.61 % FY 1994-95 Appropriations Limit .................................................................................. $14,796,098 FY 1995-96 City Population Change* ................................................................................... 10.49% FY 1995-96 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ................................................................ 4.72% Cumulative Compound (1.1049 x 1.0472) ............................................................................ 15.71% FY 1995-96 Appropriations Limit .................................................................................. $17,119,161 FY 1996-97 City Population Change* ..................................................................................... 6.54% FY 1996-97 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation**. ......................................... 17.07% Cumulative Compound (1.0654 x 1.1707) ............................................................................ 24.73% FY 1996-97 Appropriations Limit .................................................................................. $21,352,109 FY 1997-98 City Population Change* ..................................................................................... 3.01% FY 1997-98 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ................................................................ 4.67% Cumulative Compound (1.0301 x 1.0467) .............................................................................. 7.82% F Y 1997-98 Appropriation Limit ................................................................................... $23,021,965 FY 1998-99 City Population Change* ..................................................................................... 6.41% FY 1998-99 Per Capita Personal Income Change*. ............................................................... 4.15% Cumulative Compound (1.0641 x 1.0415) ............................................................................ 10.83% FY 1998-99 Appropriation Limit .................................................................................... $25,514,326 EXHIBIT "A" CITY Of TEMECULA COMPUTATION Of GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FY 1999-00 City Population Change*. .................................................................................... 4.88% FY 1999-00 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** ............................................ 7.92% Cumulative Compound (1.0488 x 1.0792) ............................................................................ 13.19% FY 1999-00 Appropriation Limit .................................................................................... $28,878,773 FY 2000-01 City Population Change*. .................................................................................... 9.55% FY 2000-01 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** ............................................ 7.73% Cumulative Compound (1.0955 x 1.0773) ............................................................................ 18.02% FY 2000-01 Appropriation Limit .................................................................................... $34,082,212 FY 2001-02 City Population Change* ................................................................................... 24.74% FY 2001-02 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** .......................................... 14.01% Cumulative Compound (1.2474 x 1.1401 ) ............................................................................ 42.22% FY 2001-02 Appropriation Limit .................................................................................... $48,470,384 FY 2002-03 City Population Change* ..................................................................................... 8.37% FY 2002-03 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** ............................................ 1.80% Cumulative Compound (1.0837 x 1.018) .............................................................................. 10.32% FY 2002-03 Appropriation Limit .................................................................................... $53,472,848 * Source: State of California Department of Finance ** Source: HdL Coren & Cone FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 OPERATING BUDGET FUND SUMMARIES CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE GENERAL FUND 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 Proposed % 2000-01 YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase Actual @ 3/31/02 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues 34,062,519 24,164,103 34,617,800 37,746,820 3,129,020 9.0% Expenditures by Dept: City Council 265,831 267,532 334,060 383,900 49,840 14.9% Community Support 422,233 292,024 428,414 407,000 (21,414) -5.0% City Manager 600,823 458,033 689,537 832,790 143,253 20.8% Economic Development 729,308 568,981 844,206 749,130 (95,076) -11.3% City Clerk 569,525 455,769 746,388 8f7,740 71,352 9.6% City Attorney 465,624 455,232 545,000 540,000 (5,000) -0.9% Finance 1,036,506 772,193 1,236,840 1,472,330 235,490 19.0% Human Resources 304,283 257,897 399,932 418,710 18,778 4.7% Planning 1,886,452 1,583,006 2,771,123 2,547,495 (223,628} -8.1% Planning - GIS 175,677 147,838 308,546 255,210 (53,336) -17.3% Building & Safety 1,672,260 1,232,675 1,986,541 2,031,620 45,079 2.3% Land Development 898,666 788,919 1,202,197 1,594,520 392,323 32.6% Public Works 3,002,372 2,719,452 4,934,002 4,486,450 (447,552) -9.1% CJP Admin 1,282,658 920,810 1,623,993 1,782,040 158,047 9.7% Police 6,795,328 6,476,721 8,942,011 9,927,200 985,189 11.0% Fire 2,087,947 2,497,531 3,102,664 3,750,450 647,786 20.9% Animal Control 96,458 57,423 115,700 102,500 (13,200) -11.4% Non-Departmental 3,421,921 3,190,183 4,222,000 4,791,210 569,210 13.5% Total Expenditures 25,713,872 23,142,219 34,433,154 36,890,295 2,457,141 7.1% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 8,348,647 1,02'1,884 184,646 856,525 671,879 Operating Transfers Out: Capital Projects 4,000,000 5,030,000 5,030,000 2,130,000 (2,900,000) information Systems Vehicles 55,000 Total Operating Transfers Out 4,055,000 5,030,000 5,030,000 2,130,000 (2,900,000) Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out 4,293,647 (4,008,116) (4,845,354) (1,273,475) CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE GENERAL FUND 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2000-01 YTD Current Proposed Actual ~ 3/31/02 Budget Budget Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 17,110,842 21,404,491 18,453,783 Revenues 34,062,519 34,617,800 37,746,820 Expenditures and Transfers Out (29,768,870) (39,463,154) (39,020,295) Fund Balance, End of Year 21,404~491 16,559,137 17,180,308 Detail of Fund Balance: Reserved for land held for resale 530,401 530,401 Reserved for long-term advance to RDA 918,171 918,171 Reserved for long-term advance to CIP (Overland) 1,425,000 712,500 Reserved for long-term receivables 320,000 307,000 Reserved for comprehensive annual leave 572,000 600,000 Unreserved: Designated for continuing appropriation 200,543 200,543 Designated for advance to ClP (Chaparral Pool) 1,000,000 1,000,000 Designated for economic uncertainty 10,272,182 10,000,000 Designated for retiree benefits 522,851 Designated for open space 522,851 Designated for capital reserves Undesignated 1,320,840 1,865,991 16,559,137 17,180,308 * Projects $1.9 million in additional revenues and expenditure savings in FY 01-02 CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE GAS TAX FUND 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002~03 Proposed % 2000-01 YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase Actual @ 3/31/02 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues 1,044,376 767,715 1,157,000 1,279,000 122,000 10.5% Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,044,376 767,715 1,157,000 1,279,000 122,000 10.5% Operating Transfers Out: General Fund t,044,376 496,897 1,157,000 1,279,000 122,000 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out 270,818 Fund Balance, Beg. of Year Fund Balance, End of Year CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 Proposed % 2000-01 YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase Actual @ 3/31/02 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues 398,619 103,544 194,600 219,000 24,400 12.5% Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 398,619 103,544 194,600 219,000 24,400 12.5% Operating Transfers Out: CIP Fund 489,600 219,000 (270,600) Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out 398,619 103,544 (295,000) 295,000 Fund Balances, Beg. of Year 398,619 103,619 Fund Balances, End of Year 398,619 103,619 103,619 CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 Proposed % YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase Actual Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues 129,832 130,000 130,000 Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 129,832 130,000 _ 130,0_00 Qperating Transfers Out: General Fund 129,832 130,000 130,000 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balances, Beg, of Year Fund Balances, End of Year CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND EQUITY INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 Proposed % 2000-01 YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase Actual @ 3/31/02 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues by Fund: Insurance 477,036 367,585 480,000 519,760 39,760 8.3% Vehicles 151,877 148,134 193,000 244,800 51,800 26.8% Information Systems 1,057,809 803,048 1,214,000 1,436,600 222,600 18.3% Support Services 277,847 202,565 278,000 301,300 23,300 8.4% Facilities 372,058 297,979 502,000 539,770 37,770 7.5% Total Revenues 2,336,627 1,819,311 2,667,000 3,042,230 375,230 14.1% Total Expenditures by Fund: Insurance 523,924 361,157 539,900 519,760 (20,140) -3.7% Vehicles 126,194 121,951 160,600 208,000 47,400 29.5% Information Systems 993,335 746,042 1,177,804 1,348,830 171,026 14.5% Support Services 266,712 172,015 273,925 292,170 18,245 6.7% Facilities 371,276 310,959 502,847 539,650 36,803 7.3% Total Expenditures 2,281,441 1~712,124 2,655,076 2,908,410 253,334 9.5% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expe nd itu res 55,186 107,187 11~ 924 133,820 121,896 Operating Transfers rn (Out): General Fund (Vehicles) 55,000 333,268 (333,268) General Fund (Information Systems) CIP (Insurance) Excess of Revenues and Operating Transfem Over (Under) Expenditures 110,186 107~ 187 345,192 133,820 (211,372) Retained Earnings, Beg. of Year 1,321,206 1,431,392 1,776,584 Retained Earnings, End of Year 1,431,392 1,776,584 _ 1,910,404 CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2002-03 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 Proposed % 2000-01 YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase Actual @ 3/31/02 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues 175,566 449,953 994,300 425,123 (569,177) -57.2% Total Expenditures 45,700 58,000 52,893 (5,107) Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 129,866 449,953 936,300 372,230 (564,070) -60.2% Operating Transfers Out: CIP Fund 129,866 152,965 696,300 72,500 (623,800) Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out 296,988 240,000 299,730 59,730 Fund Balances, Beg. of Year 240,000 Fund Balances, End of Year 240,000 539,730 FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE Actual Actual Estimated Projected FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Taxes and Franchises Property Tax $ 1,523,263 $ 1,913,481 5; 2,072,000 $ 2,174,850 Franchise Fees 1,331,593 1,618,679 1,676,000 1,954,000 Sales and Use Tax 14,009,322 16,321,929 17,670,000 19,700,000 Property Transfer Tax 376,440 435,438 407,000 415,200 Transient Occupancy Tax 1,206,095 1,345,539 1,417,000 1,835,000 Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges Business Licenses 206,963 215,795 205,000 205,000 Land Development 2,20 I, 163 1,368,432 1,218,000 1,060,890 Building 2,419,652 2,168,888 1,595,000 1,252,000 Planning 395,069 624,340 312,000 569,420 Fire 369,285 226,048 172,000 159,000 Fines and Forfeitures 425,612 469,577 463,000 505,300 Use of Money Investment Interest 1,262,576 1,539,101 805,000 896,000 Intergovernmental Revenues Motor Vehicle in Lieu 2,332,995 2,862,407 3,074,000 3,381,300 Motor Vehicle License Fees 51,802 33,200 54,000 57,000 AB 3229 (COPS) 108,643 116,791 129,600 Grants 135,421 186,790 245,200 75,000 ERAF/Booking Fee Reimbursement 218,257 267,770 106,000 Reimbursement from Capital Improvement Program 1,014,050 726,327 1,207,000 1,503,360 Community Services District 162,000 162,000 162,000 162,000 Redevelopment Agency 125,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 Other 50,265 47,785 89,000 50,000 Operating Transfers In 1,009,767 1,044,376 1,157,000 1,409,000 Miscellaneous 365,297 142,826 157,000 157,500 Total $ 31,300,530 $ 34,062,519 $ 34,617,800 $ 37,746,820 GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE Other 2.86% Property Tax Investment Interest 2.37% "~ J 5.76% Intergovernmental Franchise Fees 9.31% ~ 5,18% Reimbursement 5.14% TrOa nP:;eat 'rsnlgn~r 3.73% 'nde' ~.. Sales and Use Tax Licenses a Transient 52.19% Permits N_Occupancy Tax 8.66% 4.86% $40 - $37.747 S35 Sa~ cna $34.618 ~$31.301 i $30 S20 $15 SI0 ~ Actual 1999-00 Actual 2000-01 Estimated 2001-02 Prnjec{ed 2002-03 9 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY - GENERAL FUND Operations Capital Department Personnel & Maintenance Outlay Total City Council: City Council $ 102,400 $ 281,500 383.900 Community Support 407,000 407.000 City Manager: City Manager 591,530 238.760 $ 2,500 832.790 Economic Development 186,810 562,320 749,130 Human Resources 225,270 193340 418.710 City Attorney 540,000 540,000 City Clerk 553,360 264,380 817,740 Finance 989,050 471,180 12,100 1,472.330 Community Development: Planning 2,091,070 710.135 1.500 2,802.705 Building & Safety 1,512.070 514,550 5,000 2,031,620 Land Development 1,264,920 323,480 6,120 1.594,520 Public Works: Public Works 1,442.570 3,001,670 42,210 4,486,450 CIP Administration 1,410,640 364.850 6.550 1,782,040 Police 25,900 9,831,300 70,000 9,927.200 Fire 97.120 3,627,330 26,000 3,750,450 Animal Control 102,500 102,500 Non-Departmental 4,791,210 $ 4,7912.10 Total $ 10,492,710 $ 26,225,605 $ 171,980 $ 36,890,295 Operating Transfers to CIP 2,130,000 Total 39,020,295 l0 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY - GENERAL FUND ~- Public Works Community Development $6,268,490 Police $6,428,845 --$9,927,200 ~]' ~, ,m,~ /~....~ $540,000 $2,000,6~0 $790,900 PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND Authorized Authorized CITY COUNC1L 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 Councflmcmbers 5.00 0.00 5.00 CITY MANAGER City Manager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant City Manager 1.00 0,00 1.00 Assistant to the CiW Manager/HR Director 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Human Resources Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Marketing Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Human Resources Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Administrative Secretmy 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 9.00 0.00 9.00 CITY CLERK City Clerk/Director of Support Services 1,00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Support Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Records Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary 1.00 0.00 1.00 Minute Clerk 0.00 1.00 1.00 Office Specialist 1.00 1.00 2.00 Office Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 600 2.00 8.00 FINANCE Director o£ Finance 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant Finance Director 1.00 0.00 Fiscal Services Manager 0.75 0~00 0.75 Revenue Manager 0.00 1.00 1 Senior Accountant 1.00 0.00 1 Accountant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary 0.75 0.00 0.75 Accounting Specialist 3,00 0.00 3.00 Purchasing Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Business License Specialist/C~shier 1.00 0.00 1.00 Accounting Assistant 1.00 1.00 2.00 Total I I ~50 2.00 13.50 PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT Authorized Authorized COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 DepuW City Manager 1.00 0.00 1 Director of Planning 1.00 0.00 1.00 Principal Planner 0.00 3.00 3.00 Senior Planner 2.00 (I 00) 1.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 (1.00) 0.00 GIS Administrator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Associate Planner 4.00 2.00 6.00 Development Processing Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Code Enforcement Officer II 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant Planner 1.00 0.00 1.00 Code Enforcement Officer I 2.00 0.00 200 GIS Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary 1,00 0.00 1.00 Office Specialist 1.00 1,00 2.00 Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 2.00 Total 19.00 5.00 24.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING & SAFETY Director of Building and Safety 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Building Official 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Building Inspector 1.00 0.00 1.00 Plan Checker / Building Inspector 1,00 0.00 1 Building Inspector II 5.00 2.00 7.00 Conm~uniiy Development Technician 4.00 0.00 4.00 Administrative Secreta~ 1,00 0.00 1.00 Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 2,00 Total 16.00 3.00 19.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- LAND DEVELOPMENT Director of Public Works/City Engineer 0.30 000 030 Deputy Director of Public Works 0.30 0.00 030 Principal Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Associate Engineer 2.00 1.00 3.00 Special Projects Engineer 0.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Public Works Inspector 1,00 1.00 2.00 Assistant Engineer 3.00 0.00 3.00 Junior Engineer 0.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Tech III 0.00 1,00 1.00 Public Works Inspector 1.00 0.50 1,50 Administrative Secretary 0.25 0.00 0.25 Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 0.33 0.00 0.33 Total 11.18 5.50 16.68 PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT Authorized Authorized PUBLIC WORKS 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 Director of Public Works/Gits' Engineer 0.40 0.00 0.40 Deputy Director of Public Works 0.40 0.00 0.40 Senior Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Associate Engineer 1,00 0.00 1 Maintenance Superintendent 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 0.00 1.00 Management Analyst 0.50 0.00 0.50 Landscape Inspector 0,25 0.00 0.25 Administrative Secretary 050 0.00 0,50 Lead Maintenance Worker 4.00 0.00 4.00 Maintenance Worker 5.00 0.00 5.00 Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 1.33 0.00 1.33 Total 18.38 0.00 18.38 Authorized Authorized PUBLIC WORKS - CIP ADMINISTRATION 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 Director of Public Works/City Engineer 0,30 0.00 0.30 Deputy Director of Public Works 0,30 0.00 0.30 Principal Engineer 0.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Engineer 2.00 1100) 1.00 Associate Engineer 3.00 0.00 3.00 Property Agent 0.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Public Works Inspector 2.00 0.00 2.00 Assistant Engineer 3.00 0.00 3.00 Management Analyst 0.50 0.00 050 CIP Specialist 0.75 0.00 0.75 Public Works Inspector 0.00 0.50 0.50 Administrative Secretary 0.25 0.00 0.25 Office Specialist 0.00 1.00 1.00 Office Assistant 0.34 0.00 0.34 Total 12.44 3.50 15.94 FIR._.~E Office Specialist 0.00 1,00 1.00 Total 0.00 1 00 1 ~00 General Fund Total 108.50 22.00 130.50 14 PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES Authorized Authorized PARKS AND RECREATION 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 Director of Community Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Communiiy Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Maintenance Superintendent 0.70 0.00 0.70 Development Services Administrator 0.85 0.00 0,85 Recreation Superintendent 1.00 0.00 1.00 Recreation Services Manager 0.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Supervisor 1.40 0,00 1.40 Management Analyst 0,50 0.00 0.50 Senior Landscape Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 Museum Services Manager 2.00 0.00 2.00 Aquatics Supervisor 1.00 0.00 1,00 Recreation Supervisor 2.00 0.00 2.00 Administrative Secretm'y 1.00 0.00 1.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 1.50 0.00 1.50 Recreation Coordinator 3.00 0.00 3.00 Landscape Inspector 1.25 0.00 1.25 Maintenance Worker 2.50 0.00 2.50 Office Special/st 2.30 0.00 2.30 Custodian 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 24.50 1.00 25.50 SERVICE LEVEL B Management Analyst 0,05 0.00 0.05 SERVICE LEVEL C Maintenance Superintendent 0.05 0.00 0.05 Maintenance Supervisor 0.30 0.00 0.30 Management Analyst 0.30 0.00 0.30 Senior Landscape Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 Landscape Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 Office Specialist 0.30 0.00 0.30 Total !.95 0.00 1.95 SERVICE LEVEL D Development Services Administrator 0.15 0 00 0.15 Management Analyst 0.15 0.00 0,15 Office Specialist 0,10 0.00 0.10 Total 0.40 0.00 0.40 Community Services Total 26.90 1.00 27.90 PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Authorized Authorized INSURANCE 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 Fiscal Services Manager 0.25 0.00 0.25 Administrative Secretary 0.25 0.00 0.25 Total 0.50 0.00 0.50 INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Systems Manager 0.00 1.00 1.00 Information Systems Administrator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Information Systems Specialist 2.00 0,00 2.00 Web Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 4.00 1.00 5.00 SUPPORT SERVICES Central Services Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1,00 Office Assistant 0.50 0.00 0.50 Total 1.50 0.00 1.50 FACILITIES Maintenance Superintendent 0.25 0.00 0.25 Maintenance Supervisor 0.30 0.00 0.30 Facility Maintenance Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 0.50 0.00 0.50 Maintenance Worker 0.50 0.00 0.50 Custodian 0.00 1.00 1.00 Office Specialist 0.30 0.00 0.30 Total 2.85 1.00 3.85 Internal Service Funds Total 8.85 2,00 I0.85 PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Authorized Authorized LOW/MOD HOUSING 2000-01 Changes 2001-02 Director o f H ousing/Redevelopment 0.75 0.00 0.75 Senior Management Analyst 0.75 0.00 075 Administrative Secreta~ 0.50 0.00 0.50 Total 2.00 0.00 2.00 REDEVELOPMENT Director of Housing/Redevelopment 0.25 0.00 0.25 Senior Management Analyst 0.25 0.00 0.25 Administrative Secretary 0.50 0.00 0.50 Total 1.00 0.00 1.00 Redevelopment Agency Total 3.00 0.00 3.00 TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 147.25 25.00 172.25 17 DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL Citizens of Temecula I Mayor I Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember ] Councilmember Jcouncilmember Ron Roberts Jeffrey Stone Jeff Comerchero Michael S. Naggar Albert S. Pralt DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL PROGRAM: CITY COUNCIL MISSION: The City Council is elected by the citizens of Temecula to set overall policies, legislative and otherwise, to give direction to the City Manager to ensure his effective and efficient operation of the City and to identify the types and levels of programs and services to be provided to its residents. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Completion of Vail Ranch Annexation · Opened interim Fire Station 92 located in Vail Ranch · Completion of a citizen opinion survey · Approved development agreements for Harveston & Wolf Creek Specific Plans · Introduced Youth Summer Activity Programs (SMART Program) · Completed master plan for the Children's Museum · Completion of Senior Center expansion · Completion of Chaparral High School pool and Aquatic Center GOAL 1: PROVIDE A SAFE, SECURE, CLEAN, HEALTHY, AND ORDERLY COMMUNITY BY BALANCING THE UTILIZATION OF OPEN SPACE, PARKS, TRAIL FACILITIES, QUALITY JOBS, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, AND ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTIVES: ~ Encourage recreational and educational programs for all age groups ~ Preserve natural resources while stimulating technology and promoting commerce } Adopt City Ordinances using sound fiscal policy } Enhance and revitalize historic areas ~ Provide clear policy direction to City staff in programs and services offered by the City } Adopt policies and procedures using legislative action consistent with City goals } Encourage local job creation through retention and attraction efforts GOAL2: ENHANCE COMMUNICATION TO ENSURE THAT CITIZENS ARE WELL INFORMED ON COMMUNITY ISSUES OBJECTIVES: ~ Organize community workshops to assist in developing action plans ~ Maintain regular updates and accessible information on City web site } Distribute quarterly newsletters to update the community on capital projects, recreational events, and other community items of interest } Use City Council meeting intermissions to disseminate community information 19 DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL GOAL 3: IMPROVE THE CITY'S INFLUENCE IN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS AND INTRAGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS OBJECTIVES: ~ Lobby State legislators to ensure they support positions that further the City's interest } Lobby Federal legislators to obtain funds for the City's transportation systems upgrades } Continue City Council member attendance and participation on local, regional, statewide, and national boards and commissions Continue joint meetings with the Temecula Valley Unified School District Board so that the two governing entities are working towards common goals ~' Work closely with City of Temecula Commissions through joint meetings and Commissioner participation during Council meetings Continue to support the Temecula Sister City Association to enhance foreign relations with Temecula's Sister Cities GOAL 4: EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENT AND ADMINISTER THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVES: ~' Work collectively with Riverside County and participate in the Riverside County Integrated Planning (RCIP) process ~' Coordinate efforts with the City of Murrieta, particularly in the areas of traffic circulation and economic development ~' Meet regularly with Temecula Valley Unified School District on issues of mutual concern and work to develop consensus on solutions ~' Maintain cooperative working relationships with the Pechanga Tribe GOAL 5: TO WORK COLLABORATIVELY WITH THE CITY MANAGER TO ENSURE THAT ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS OPERATE AS SMOOTHLY AND EFFECTIVELY AS POSSIBLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Projected Actual Projected Projected FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Percent of citizen concerns responded to within 5 business days of receipt 95% 95% 95% 95% Number of citizen concern correspondences addressed 350 325 350 300 Number of community newsletters published 4 3 4 3 Number of meetings with outside organizations 260 275 265 270 DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL PROGRAM: COMMUNITY SUPPORT MISSION: The Community Support Program is responsible for funding various special programs within the City, such as the Community Services Funding Program, Library funding, and Sister Cities Program. It also funds the Temecula Valley Arts Council and the Temecula Valley Playhouse providing cultural events to the community. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Sponsored Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure · Continued sponsorship and support for the Temecula Arts Council & Temecula Valley Playhouse · Sponsored a $25,000 donation to the families of victims of the September 11~h tragedy GOAL 1: FUND LOCAL NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, WHICH PROVIDE THE C1TIZENS OF TEMECULA CULTURAL EVENTS, NEEDED SERVICES OR EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE COMMUNITY Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of organizations funded 40 43 55 55 Total funding for organizations/community $477,140 422,233 $428,400 407,000 Number of students funded for exchange trips to sister cities 40 5 28 20 21 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER CITY MANAGI~ Shawn D. Nelson I I ASSISTANT DEPUTY CITY MANAGI~ CITY MANAGER James O'Grady Gary Thornhill ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER Grant Yates I I I I GENERAL EMERGENCY ECONOMIC HUMAN ADMINISYRATION MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES republic Information ~Preparedness ~Business'At~raction ~Benefits ~Intergovernmental Coordination ~Business Retention ~ Employment ~Public Relations ~Training ~Marketing ~Training ~Animel Control ---.Emergency mLabor Development --Employee Relations Operations Center 22 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PROGRAM: GENERAL ADMINISTRATION MISSION: The City Manager is appointed by the City Council to serve as the Chief Administrative Officer of the organization. The City Manager's Office coordinates the implementation of policy and programs established by the City Council. The City Manager provides overall direction to the administration of City programs and services; coordinates economic development and marketing activities; inter-governmental relations, lobbying, and public relations efforts; oversees inter-departmental programs for human resources, strategic planning, emergency preparedness and animal control. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Coordinated State of City event Coordinated preparation of community newsletters Coordinated City Council business & special engagements · Coordinated facility space planning Retained a State Lobbyist to monitor legislation and lobby on behal£ofthe City Coordinated the effort for design, construction and installation of an emergency back up generator for City Hall GOAL l: COORDINATE THE WORK EFFORTS OF ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS TO ACHIEVE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY GOALS OBJECTIVES: > Conduct weekly staff meetings with all Department Directors to ensure work efforts are coordinated effectively > Conduct a Department Director retreat to establish service level and program goals > Encourage and provide resources for continued education and staff development > Respond to all citizen complaints within a timely manner GOAL 2: COORDINATE AND PROVIDE TIMELY AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA REGARDING CITY EVENTS AND ACTI¥1TIES OBJECTIVES: > Prepare timely press releases regarding City events and activities > Conduct monthly press briefings > Continue to have open communication with media regarding City programs GOAL3: UPHOLD THE CITY'S SUPERIOR LEVEL OF CUSTOMER SERVICE BY PROACTIVELY SUPPORTING EMPLOYEES IN MAINTAINING POSITIVE CITIZEN RELATIONS OBJECTIVES: ~ Provide training to all employees on the importance of positive customer service and public relations efforts ~ Facilitate staffand City Council workshops to obtain public input regarding City projects DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER GOAL 4: REPRESENT THE CITY'S INTERESTS IN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS OBJECTIVES: ~- Assign staff resources and coordinate with Riverside County through the Riverside County Integrated Planning process ~ Attend monthly Western Riverside Council of Governments Technical Advisory Committee Meetings } Track legislative bills and provide support/opposition as requested or required ~' Encourage State and Federal legislatures to use City Hall as community resource } Encourage department directors or assigned staff to attend relevant intergovernmental meetings and report on pertinent issues Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of legislative responses submitted 25 27 25 25 Number of community workshops held 4 4 4 4 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PROGRAM: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MISSION: In case of emergency, the City Manager is the Disaster Director. The mission of this program is to implement, monitor and coordinate the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and Emergency Operations Center (EOC), This program also provides overall coordination and training, and monitors the operational readiness within the various sections of the emergency management organizational structure. This program promotes increased preparedness of the City to respond to disasters. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Conducted Standard Emergency Management System training for City employees Scheduled internal exercise for emergency management working group Completed installation of emergency back-up generator at City Hall Reviewed and inventoried Emergency Operation Center materials for City Hall GOAL 1: ENSURE ALL CITY EMPLOYEES ARE ADEQUATELY TRAINED ON HOW TO REACT AND WHAT ROLE TO ASSUME DURING AN EMERGENCY OBJECTIVES: ~ Send employees through the County of Riverside's Planning/Logistics coarse >' Continue to work through the emergency management committee to implement the updated Multi-Hazard Function Plan } Continue to train employees by simulating actual City disasters GOAL 2: INFORM/INVOLVE THE COMMUNITY IN THE CITY'S DISASTER PLANS OBJECTIVES: )~ Continue Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) training program with the Guidant Corporation } Expand CERT Program with other businesses in our community Coordinate with the Fire Department and the Neighborhood Watch Program to develop a plan to involve homeowners' associations with disaster preparedness plans Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of employees trained in Emergency Management courses 85 40 50 100 Number of meetings/training drills held 20 20 20 10 25 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PROGRAM: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MISSION: The Economic Development Program is responsible for maintaining a sound and diverse economic base for business development and tourism for the City. The Economic Development partners have been a key component in Temecula's success as they have worked together with City Council and City Staff. Such groups include the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance, Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, the Inland Empire Economic Partnership, and the Temecula Valley Film Council. Through these professional affiliations many partnerships have been formed, which have helped to create a strong healthy economy and enhance our exceptional quality of life. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · First Place SAVVY Award for Tourism Rack Brochure · First Place-Association of Professional Brochure Distributors 2001 International Best Brochure Temecula Valley Newcomer & Relocation Guide · Tourism Rack Brochure Tourism Press Kit Temecula Business Brochure · Temecula Demographic Marketing Insert GOAL l: DEVELOP A STRONG BASE OF CLEAN MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES, WHICH EMPLOY A SKILLED LABOR FORCE AND CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATED INTO TEMECULA'S COMMUNITY CHARACTER OBJECTIVES: ~ Attract and retain industry that complements Temecula's character and takes advantage of Temecula's location for ease of goods movement and corporate mobility Encourage the g~owth and expansion of existing industry by providing high quality municipal services, facilities, and economic development assistance ~ Maintain a local regulatory environment that is favorable to clean industry Provide technical assistance to industries that will be affected by new regional air quality regulations and other regional regulations GOAL 2: DIVERSIFY THE ECONOMIC BASE TO INCLUDE A RANGE OF MANUFACTURING, RETAIL AND SERVICE ACTIVITIES, AND VINTNERS OBJECTIVES: ~ Provide for industrial land uses which facilitate a variety of user types, including high tech, semi-conductor and health technology/manufacturing, biomedical/biotech, telecommunications, electronics, office, and research and development space ~ Plan for land use and development patterns that allow succession of use and will adapt to Temecula's economic conditions Promote development of properly located and well-designed commercial centers to meet the diverse service needs of the City ~' Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists, including apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances ~ Use redevelopment powers and opportunities to enhance development opportunities 26 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER GOAL 3: MAINTAIN AN ECONOMIC BASE TO PROVIDE A SOUND FISCAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CITY AS WELL AS QUALITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND HIGH SERVICE LEVELS OBJECTIVES: ~ Encourage a pattern of development that balances revenue generating land uses in phase with other uses that have negative fiscal impacts ~' Encourage the growth or relocation of industries that generate tax and employment } Evaluate fiscal impacts of development on an on-going basis and provide appropriate mitigation strategies >' Take advantage of Temecula's regional capture of taxable sales and continue to establish Temecula as a retailing center along the Interstate 15 corridor GOAL4: ESTABLISH A DIVERSE EDUCATION, TRAINING AND JOB PLACEMENT SYSTEM, WHICH WILL DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY WORK FORCE IN TEMECULA OBJECTIVES: } Support economic development goals through a range of education and training activities } Establish a proactive periodic dialogue early in the planning process between the City and educational institutions, including school districts and community colleges, on issues related to the phasing of development, service standards and demands ~' Explore the potential for a comprehensive extension center of higher education to Temecula Support job placement goals through City website, job databases, and local job fairs and posting system GOAL 5: PROMOTE THE ADVANTAGES TO BUSINESSES LOCATING IN TEMECULA, INCLUDING COST ADVANTAGES, AMENITIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND CIVIC SERVICES OBJECTIVES: )~ Develop and maintain a marketing program to publicize the virtues of Temecula ~' Monitor the economic conditions in Temecula in comparison to other locations in California and throughout the nation to determine relative advantages } Track prospects and assist businesses with relocations and expansions ~' Monitor the supply of housing in relation to the supply of jobs in terms of balancing area-wide jobs, households, worker eamings and housing expenses ~' Monitor existing businesses in Temecula, upgrade retention programs and increase the number of retention visits ~' Promote the Work Force Development Center in Temecula and manufacturing facility in Hemet to address the training needs of both business and the labor pool Enhance the City web site to expand economic development information and GIS capabilities 27 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER GOAL 6: DEVELOP TEMECULA AS A COMPREHENSIVE, RECOGNIZABLE TOURIST DESTINATION, WITH A RANGE OF ATTRACTIONS OBJECTIVES: ~' Increase the number of tourists visiting Temecula and increase attendance at all Temecula special events through a comprehensive marketing program } Continue cooperative efforts with the winemaking/growers industry in the Temecula Valley to promote Temecula as a prime tourist destination ~' Revitalize and enhance Old Town to expand its role in local tourism and to improve its attractiveness, accessibility, and economic vitality through the development of the Children's Museum and Community Theater } Enhance the City's image through development of cultural facilities, including performing arts and museums Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY' 2000-01 FY 2000-011 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of alliance inquiries 4,000 2,796 5,000 4,000 Number of alliance/IEEP leads 300 99 400 300 Number of retention visits 60 18 60 60 Number of Mayor's business roundtables 2 2 3 3 Number of commercial broker workshops 2 2 3 3 Number of trade shows 10 4 10 6 Number of ad placements N/A 11 7 l0 Number of articles in local newsletters N/A 10 14 14 Number of resource materials N/A 8 6 8 Number of awards N/A 2 0 Number of resources/event calendars 6 7 6 7 Number of familiarization tours 3 2 3 3 Number of media placements 20 26 20 25 Number of ad placements in publications 7 13 7 13 Number of tourism trade shows 4 4 4 4 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PROGRAM: HUMAN RESOURCES MISSION: Human Resources is responsible for providing a comprehensive human resources program throughout the City. Responsibilities of Human Resources include the administration of recruitment; selection; equal opportunity; classification; salary; employee benefits; worker's compensation; discipline; training development; employee relations; and development and implementation of administrative guidelines and personnel policies. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Successfully administered an outstanding Employee Recognition Program Successfully administered a successful Safety Program Negotiated a new Memorandum of Understanding GOAL l: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT TO ALL DEPARTMENTS IN THE AREAS OF RECRUITMENT, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, WORKER'S COMPENSATION, EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE AND LABOR RELATIONS OBJECTIVES: ~' Maintain a six-week recruitment processing timeline Administer employee benefit programs to include conducting annual open enrollment and providing input to benefit providers via City benefit committee, made up of representatives from each City department } Meet quarterly with employee union representatives to discuss areas of mutual interest ~ Maintain City Hall bulletin boards GOAL 2: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES FOR EMPLOYEES OBJECTIVES: ~' Publish a list of in-house training opportunities as determined by the C.I.T.Y. training committee Proactively involve employees in training opportunities, both in-house and outside Facilitate bi-monthly management training luncheons Provide three (3) training days per year for each City employee Schedule attendance at Supervisor and Management Academies GOAL3: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF EMPLOYEE MORALE FOR CITY EMPLOYEES OBJECTIVES: } Administer employee recognition program, including quarterly Temecula Pride/Good Deed Award luncheons Promote "My Bright Idea" Program Recognize public safety employees Facilitate and direct Administrative Support Group Facilitate and direct City Information and Training for C.I.T.Y. Committee 29 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER GOAL 4: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT IN THE AREAS OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND SAFETY FOR CITY EMPLOYEES OBJECTIVES: ~ Conduct monthly employee safety meetings to implement the City's injury and illness prevention program ~ Conduct semi-annual fire drills ~ Pro-actively search for and support ergonomic equipment improvements ~' Promote Workers Warm-Ups Program and related injury prevention programs ~' Continuous heightening of "Safety First" awareness by offering safety training ~ Administer Tailgate Safety Program ~ Administer Safe Driving Program Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of recruitments conducted 42 33 32 40 Percent of recruitments within a six-week timeline 95% 99% 99% 99% Number of applications processed 1,800 1,250 1,000 1,750 Number of employee safety meetings l I 11 11 11 Number of quarterly employee meetings 4 4 4 4 Number of training days provided per employee 3 3 3 3 Number of employees receiving recognition awards 40 60 60 30 Number of Temecula Pride luncheons 4 4 4 4 Number of administrative support group meetings 3 9 9 9 Percent of evaluations processed within prescribed timeframes 95% 99% 98% 99% 30 DEPARTMENT: CITY ATTORNEY CITY COUNCIL CITY ATYORNEY ~ Peter M. Thorson CITY MANAGI~ Shawn D. Nelson DEPARTMENT: CITY ATTORNEY PROGRAM: CITY ATTORNEY MISSION: The City Attorney serves as legal advisor to the City Council, City Manager, and the various City departments, commissions, committees, and boards. The City Attorney prepares and approves for legality the majority of proposed City ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and other legal documents. The City Attorney also represents the City in all litigation. GOAL I: PROVIDE SOUND LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY STAFF, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS ON ALL MATTERS CONCERNING THE CITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF CITY POLICY OBJECTIVES: ~ Render legal advice on all City matters to Council and staff in a manner that permits timely and appropriate action ~' Review and advise staff in a timely manner on court decisions and new laws that affect City operations ~' Advise and represent the City on litigation matters in a complete and timely fashion Review all ordinances, resolutions, contracts and agreements in a complete and timely manner 32 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK CITY CLERK/ DIRECTOR OF SUPPORT SERVICES Susan W. Jones DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SUPPORT SERVICES Michaela Balireich I I C1TY CLERK I ' SUPPORT SERVICES ~Council Support ~Copy Center/Mail Room ~Elections ~-Information Systems ~Legislative History ~Reception Services ~Public Information --Records Management 33 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK PROGRAM: CITY CLERK MISSION: To compile and maintain the official records of the City and to make them readily accessible to all; to conduct fair and impartial municipal elections; to prepare, certify, and/or adhere to public notice requirements with regard to legal documents, ordinances, resolutions, public hearings, etc.; to codify and disseminate the City's Municipal Code; to promote public awareness of the processes of government; to provide meeting, administrative, and legislative support to the Mayor, City Councilmembers, and its Commissions and Committees. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Successfully administered the 2001 Municipal Election in an efficient manner in accordance with all California Election Codes Completed a 2001 Election Manual, complete with all updated California and Municipal Law Sections, and new FPPC forms · Scanned all agendas, minutes, resolutions and ordinances as adopted · Held and expanded the City's fourth annual Voter Registration Drive · Expanded the lobby reception services and redesigned lobby to more efficiently serve the public and enhance customer service · Provided Notary services to staff and public Provided educational materials in form of brochures, flyers, and on the web page, to assist citizens in working with their local government Provided information on community events and City events on the local cable television channel, to be broadcast during the intermissions at City Council meetings · Provided appropriate support to the City Council, City staff and the community regarding the timely processing of City documents GOAL I: PROVIDE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY STAFF, AND THE COMMUNITY REGARDING THE TIMELY PROCESSING OF CITY DOCUMENTS OBJECTIVES: ~' Prepare and distribute agenda packets to the City Council at least 72 hours prior to all meetings Record, transcribe, and finalize meeting minutes in a timely manner for City Council, Temecula Community Services District, Redevelopment Agency, Temecula Public Financing Agency, Planning Commission, Public/Traffic Safety Commission, and the Old Town Local Review Board ~' Provide timely processing of ordinances and resolutions within one week of adoption } Process contracts and agreements within ten (10) days of City Council action 34 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK GOAL 2: CONTINUE TO ADMINISTER A COMPREHENSIVE RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, MAXIMIZING THE OPTIMUM USAGE OF SPACE IN CITY HALL, AND FOCUSING ON CUSTOMER SERVICE Continue the scanning of permanent records such as City Council Agendas, minutes, resolutions, ordinances, and agenda packets immediately upon adoption Finalize the new comprehensive City of Temecula Retention Schedule Provide training to all City departments regarding the newly adopted Retention Schedule Expand upon customer service by providing opportunities for interaction via the City web site for records requests Continue to provide excellent customer service by handling all records requests within a 1 O-day period } Accelerate scanning of City-documents to provide better customer service and easier access to City documents Provide continuing training to all departments on the usage of LaserFiche and how to better access City documents GOAL 3: COMPLETE THE LASERFICHE WEBLINK IN COORDINATION WITH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO CITY RECORDS VIA THE INTERNET OBJECTIVES: > Make public record documents available to the public via the City's Web Page ~ Provide a public access terminal (Kiosk) located at City Hall in the front lobby ~ Increase customer service by providing staff to assist the public with record searches GOAL 4: MAKE THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET AYAILABLE ON THE CITY'S WEB SITE OB.IECTIVES: ~' Scan all City Council Agenda Packets prior to City Council Meetings, to make the complete agenda packet available to the public via the lnternet ~ Provide information on the City's web site to make this a user-friendly process Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Average time for distribution of Council packets before meetings 96 hours 96 hours 96 hours 96 hours Average time to finalize meeting minutes 3 weeks 4 weeks 4 weeks 4 weeks Average processing of ordinances and resolutions from time of adoption 6 days 6 days 6 days 6 days Average processing of contracts from time of City Council action 8 days 8 days 8 days 8 days Number of citizen voter registrations obtained 150 180 200 200 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK PROGRAM: SUPPORT SERVICES MISSION: The Support Services Fund is the cost center for central duplicating services, the mailroom, receiving, and copy equipment maintenance for City Hall. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Completed a formal RFP process and awarded a contract to a new vendor for all copying equipment Continued to develop the support services manual which will include specifics with regard to mail, copying, and other available services Continued to provide efficient and timely customer service in light of the increased demands on the division include copying, mailroom, and other services Increased downstairs reception coverage in an effort to provide additional internal/external customer service GOAL 1: COMPLETE A CENTRAL SERVICES DIVISION MANUAL TO ASSIST IN THE CONTINUATION OF EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE CUSTOMER SERVICE TO BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CUSTOMERS OBJECTIVES: ~ Introduce and present the manual to each administrative secretary of each department for review and input Present the completed manual to each department at a departmental staff meeting to ensure compliance and understanding by all departments GOAL 2: INITIATE AN RFP PROCESS FOR CITY HALL PAPER PRODUCTS TO ENSURE COST EFFECTIVENESS OBJECTIVES: ~ Begin the RFP process in July and award a contract by September 30, 2002 GOAL 3: PROVIDE A FULLY STAFFED DOWNSTAIRS LOBBY AREA IN ORDER TO FURTHER ENHANCE THE CITY'S EFFORTS TOWARD CUSTOMER SERVICE OBJECTIVES: ~' Modifythe downstairs lobby area ), Install a kiosk with internet and Laserfiche Web link access for public use } Provide staffing during business hours for public assistance COST ALLOCATION: Charges to departments are calculated based on the number of color and regular copies made by each department, as well as on the number of on-site personnel for each department DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY' 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Computers installed / replaced 26 45 36 129 Computer training days offered per year 50 10 16 20 Information systems requests responded to 2,800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Number of service request slips submitted to copy center N/A N/A 2,600 3,000 Turn-around period for copy center requests N/A N/A 48 hours 48 hours 37 DEPARTMENT: FINANCE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Genie Roberts I I ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR FINANCE Karen Jester SUPPORT SERVICES Gus Papagolos I I I ~ Capital Improvement FINANCE FINANCE Program Budget OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT ~ Risk Management ~ Purchasing -- Business Licensing ~ Accounts Payable ~ Operating Budget ~ Cashiering ~ Accounts Receivable --. Finandal Reporting ~ Grant Administration --- Payroll ~ Cash & Investments ~ General Ledger ~ Contract Administration Maintenance ~ Debt F'mancing ~ Community Facilities District Administration 38 DEPARTMENT: FINANCE PROGRAM: FINANCE OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT MISSION: The Finance Operations and Management Program is responsible for managing the City's financial operations in accordance with established fiscal policies. Primary responsibilities include cash and investment management, financial reporting, preparation of the Annual Operating Budget, internal audit, payroll, accounts payable and receivable, financial oversight, and administration of all City funds and accounts. Additionally, the department administers the public safety contracts of police and fire. 2001-02 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Received awards from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) and Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for excellence in financial reporting for the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) · Received awards from CSMFO and GFOA for excellence in operational budgeting for the City's FY 2001-02 Annual Operating Budget · Implemented and trained personnel on the general ledger, accounts payable and purchasing functions of the Eden lnForum Gold accounting software implemented credit card purchasing at City public counters in the cashiering office and other community service areas GOAL l: PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE AND METICULOUS GENERAL ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS TO ENSURE THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAINTAINS A SOUND FINANCIAL CONDITION OBJECTIVES: > Upgrade the accounting sof~ware to provide enhanced reporting and capabilities ~' Manage the investment portfolio with the safety of principal as the primary objective and return on investment as the secondary objective, while maintaining liquidity to meet the City's obligations > Provide timely and accurate check runs for accounts payable and processing of payroll ~' Provide timely and accurate financial reports, including the CAFR for the decision makers and operating departments Continue to prepare the CAFR, obtain an unqualified audit opinion, and comply with the CSMFO and GFOA award criteria GOAL2: PROVIDE A SOUND FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE CITY THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS OBJECTIVES: ~ Continue to utilize the five-year financial plan to determine the future impact of proposed programs and capital improvement projects to ensure long term fiscal stability Prepare an Annual Operating Budget which complies with the CSMFO and GFOA award criteria GOAL3: PROV1DE CONTRACT COORDINATION AND OVERSIGHT OF THE CITY'S POLICE AND FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTS WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY OBJECTIVES: ~ Negotiate annual service contracts that provide the highest level of services to the City ~ Ensure that police staffing meets the City's goal of one officer per 1,000 citizens DEPARTMENT: FINANCE Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-0~ Percentage of bank reconciliations performed before the close of the subsequent month 100% 100% 100% 100% Invoices processed per year 12,000 13,055 13,200 13,500 Payroll checks/direct deposits processed per year 5,600 5,468 6,000 5,800 CSMFO and GFOA award winning CAFR documents prepared with unqualified opinions I I I 1 Management letter comments as a result of City's annual audit 0 0 0 0 CSMFO and GFOA award winning operating budgets prepared 1 I 1 1 DEPARTMENT: FINANCE PROGRAM: FINANCE SUPPORT SERVICES MISSION: The Finance Support Services Program is responsible for the preparation of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget document, risk management, purchasing, business licensing, grant administration, and other Finance Support related projects. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Received the award for excellence in Capital budgeting from the California Society of Municipal Finance Offices (CSMFO) for the 2002-2006 CIP budget · Administered 100% reimbursement to developed/undeveloped property owners in the CFD 88-12 totaling over $1,661761 including a $349,919 payment to the prior year reimbursement Renewed the City's property and liability insurance policies with a smaller than anticipated premium increase Improved the Business License database tracking of Riverside County certificate requirements for specialized businesses GOAL I: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY THROUGH THE CIP BUDGET PROCESS OBJECTIVES: ~ Prepare a CIP budget document in accordance with the CSMFO award criteria Work collaboratively with each department individually and in workshops to ensure completeness and consistency throughout the CIP process in accordance with City Council direction GOAL 2: MINIMIZE CITY LIABILITY THROUGH THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES: } Conduct quarterly and as-needed field inspections of right-of-way and parks with the insurance carrier's loss control administrator Conduct a preliminary review of all claims within ten calendar days of receipt Actively participate in monthly Safety Committee meetings Update the Risk Management Policy and Safety Manuals GOAL3: ENSURE A CUSTOMER SERVICE ORIENTED PURCHASING OPERATION WHICH PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR ALL CITY PURCHASES OBJECTIVES: ~' Process 90% of all pumhase requests within 48 hours of receipt Use California Multiple Award Schedules to streamline the purchasing time line and take advantage of competitive pricing } Frequently update and train staff on contract requirements for professional services, maintenance and construction agreements Assist staff in the preparation and review of Requests for Proposals (RFP) and Requests for Qualifications (RFQ) 41 DEPARTMENT: FINANCE GOAL 4: PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE BUSINESS LICENSE PROGRAM WHICH ENCOURAGES 100% PARTICIPATION BY CITY BUSINESSES OBJECTIVES: ~' Process 90% of all new license applications within five working days ~' Process 95% of all business license renewals by February 28th each year ~ Coordinate administrative action with Code Enforcement for businesses that do not have an active Business License Quarterly review business license and sales tax data to identify businesses that do not have a sales permit number Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of business licenses issued 5,700 5,750 5,800 6,000 Percentage of business license applications processed within 5 working days 95% 95% 95% 95% Percent of business license renewals processed by February 29th 95% 97% 95% 95% Number of purchase orders processed 2,475 2,600 2,700 2,800 Percent of purchase orders processed within 48 hours of receipt 98% 98% 98% 98% Percent of claims processed within 10 days of receipt 100% 100% 100% 100% 42 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPUTY CITY MANAG~ G~ Thornhill I I I I DIRECTOR OF PLANN1NG DIRECTOR OF BUILDING & SAFEff DEPUIY DIRECTOR Debbie Ubnoske Tony FJmo PUBLIC WORKS Ron hris I CURRENT ADVANCE AI) MINISTIB. TIVE BUILDING 133~ PLANNING PLANNING SERVICES SERVICES DEVELOPY~VI' --Development Review --GeneralPlan --Agency Review --Plan Re~ewProcessing --Pernits --Public lnformatio~ --Ordinancel)evdopm~t --C~ Enforcement --Plan Re~im --Plan Checks ,--CEQAMa~gement --C-eo~hiclnfonmfion--l)evdopmentPmcessi~g --Pemitlssua~ .-MapRecordatlon --CEQA Management --Publiclgormation -Inspection S~r~ic~s --De;'elopmem Inspection --Plan Revi~ DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: CURRENT PLANNING MISSION: The Current Planning Program provides a variety of planning services to the community, including reviewing and processing of development proposals for conformance with City policies and regulations and implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition, staff provides support to tile Planning Commission and City Council and assists the general public and development applicants regarding planning information and application processing. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Processed major Planned Developments (Temecula Creek Village; Villages of Paseo del Sol; Temecula Villages; Rancho Community Church) Streamlined DRC process and Conceptual Plan review · Scheduled intensive professional development training program for planners (Effective communication, professional writing, time management, stress management, land use law update, etc.) GOAL 1: PROMOTE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATIVE PLANNING TECHNIQUES IN THE CITY OBJECTIVES: ~. Continue ongoing professional development training by attending seminars and field study } Continue purchasing of latest planning journals and books outlining latest theories and trends in innovative progressive planning } Encourage staff to obtain professional certificates and advanced degrees in planning GOAL 2: PROVIDE QUALITY CUSTOMER SERVICE OBJECTIVES: ~' Revise and simplify the development applications ~' Improve screening of submitted applications at counter to reduce the rejection rate (incompleteness) of new applications by 50% ~' Strive to return all phone calls within 24 hours GOAL 3: PRO¥1DE FOR THE TIMELY PROCESSING OF PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATIONS WITHIN ESTABLISHED TIMELINES OBJECTIVES: ~ Review minor applications, such as sign permit requests, at front counter to reduce processing time } Require staff to attend at least one legal seminar on development processing timelines mandated by State law Eliminate the DRC process for basis applications that have no issues Utilize the Pre-application process for complex applications to reduce processing time of formal applications Allow concurrent processing of building plans for "fast-track" applications that have all issues worked out and only require final approval DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of public hearing cases submitted 75 79 75 80 Number of pre-application meetings scheduled 20 8 10 15 Number of"fast track" projects 2 0 2 2 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: ADVANCE PLANNING/SPECIAL PROJECTS/GIS MISSION: The Advance Planning and Special Projects Program is responsible for a variety of long-range planning issues affecting the community, including implementation and maintenance of the City's General Plan; preparation of special land use studies of concern to the City; and maintenance of vital demographic and physical information data. This program provides support services to other departments/agencies, monitors various regional agencies and programs, and develops special projects in response to City Council direction. The purpose of the General Plan is to provide long-term vision and consistency for local development and infrastructure programs. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Started the process of comprehensively updating the City General Plan, including community outreach and advisory committee meetings · Completed numerous information requests for the City Council · Processed 12 environmental reviews for City public works and parks projects · Completed General Plan Implementation Report Approved four General Plan Amendments Approved the Harveston Specific Plan · Geographic Information System (GIS) prepared over 250 mapping and information requests Supported the establishment ofa GIS based in-vehicle response and routing program for ambulance and fire protection services · Established a formal procedure for updating the General Plan Land Use and Official City Zoning Maps GOAL 1: ENSURE THAT CITY INTERESTS ARE REPRESENTED ON VARIOUS REGIONAL AND INTER-JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES OBJECTIVES: } Continue to participate in regional planning activities such as the Margarita River Watershed Project and regional infrastructure issues as staff levels permit Coordinate all projects and efforts with other agencies, including but not limited to the County of Riverside, the City of Murrieta, the Southern California Association of Governments, the Western Regional Council of Governments, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and regional utility agencies as staff levels permit GOAL 2: IMPLEMENT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN OBJECTIVES: Develop an Open Space/Habitat Program for the City that includes both the City and surrounding areas GOAL 3: MAINTAIN AND UPDATE PORTIONS OF THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN TO ENSURE THAT THE PLAN CONTINUES TO PROVIDE ACCURATE GUIDANCE AND DIRECTION FOR LOCAL PROGRAMS AND PLANNING ACTIVITIES OBJECTIVES: > Prepare Annual General Plan Implementation Report } Complete the update of the Housing Element to ensure that the provisions of State Law provide adequate housing opportunities ~ Complete the comprehensive update of the General Plan DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOAL 4: UNDERTAKE SPECIAL STUDIES, AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OR THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE, TO ACTIVELY PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE AND TO SATISFY THE COMMUNITY'S SPECIAL PLANNING NEEDS OBJECTIVES: ~ Process applications for new Specific Plans to implement the General Plan } Continue to work with property owners and adopt the Southside Specific Plan to address changing circumstances along the Front Street corridor south of Old Town, as staff resources permit } Initiate a City Hall Master Plan Study to proactively address the City's future long-term facility needs } Undertake high priority special planning studies, programs, ordinances, information requests and amendments as staff resources permit } Upgrade the Planning web page to provide better information and meet user needs GOAL 5: CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS FOR CITY PROJECTS OBJECTIVES: } Work with the Community Service and Public Works Departments to ensure compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and the timely approval of all City projects as staff resources permit GOAL 6: OPERATE THE CITYWIDE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) TO MEET LOCAL DATE AND INFORMATION NEEDS OBJECTIVES: } Update the County database and develop additional City data layers to support City departments and programs to increase the efficiency of providing public information ~' Establish connections between the GIS and other City databases } Produce reports and map exhibits for various City departments in support of their operations and for the community to improve customer service ~' Complete the implementation of Map Objects and provide staff training DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: CODE ENFORCEMENT/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION MISSION: The Code Enforcement/Administrative Services Division provides a variety of planning services to the community, including; reviewing development proposals; monitoring regional agencies and programs; and coordinating with outside agencies to protect the quality of life within the City of Temecula. In addition, this Division is tasked with implementing and managing an effective code enforcement program. This Division also provides administrative staff support for the Community Development Department and aides in the coordination of development services with the public. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Completed the review of major County of Riverside development projects applications in the sphere of influence of the City of Temecula Successful completion of Citywide weed abatement program · Secured approximately $20,000 in revenue as a result of abandoned vehicle abatement efforts Citywide · Participated in numerous committee meetings with the County of Riverside regarding their new General Plan, Multi-Species Habitat Plan, and Transportation Plan GOAL l: ENSURE THAT THE CITY'S INTERESTS ARE REPRESENTED ON THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PROJECT (RCIP) AND TO MONITOR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ADJACENT TO AND WITHIN THE CITY'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OBJECTIVES: ~' Represent the City's interests and continue to participate in the Riverside County integrated Project, Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process ~' Provide comprehensive research, written comments, and present public testimony on projects and issues within the County of Riverside, the City of Murrieta and numerous agencies and special districts that might affect the quality of life in Temecula Coordinate inter-governmental relations between the City of Temecula, the County of Riverside, and local jurisdictions GOAL 2: ENSURE THAT ALL DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES ARE ADEQUATELY TRAINED FOR THEIR RESPECTIVE TASKS OBJECTIVES: } Develop and provide training sessions for professional and clerical staff on current topics specifically tailored for Planning Department employees DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOAL 3: ENSURE A SAFE, DECENT AND ATTRACTIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES AND VISITORS AND PRESERVE AND UPGRADE THE CITY'S HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES OBJECTIVES: ~ Maintain a three-day response time for addressing citizen-generated concerns ~ Contact reporting party at the close of each case GOAL 4: PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE CITYWIDE WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES: >' Manage the commencement of annual weed abatement activities Citywide by May I and complete program activities in a timely manner Monitor the completion of weed abatement activities and obtain City Council confirmation of abatement cost assessments for timely recording on the following year's property tax rolls GOAL 5: PROVIDE RESPONSIVE ASSISTANCE TO THE PUBLIC OBJECTIVES: } Ensure inspectors are allocated time to respond to public inquiries >' Ensure information on land use and code enforcement is available to the public GOAL 6: MAINTAIN A RESPONSIVE PROGRAM FOR CONTROL OF VECTOR NUISANCES OBJECTIVES: ~ Provide resource information to public within 24 hours of receipt for all citizen concerns GOAL7: EFFECTIVELY TRANSITION CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES FROM RIVERSIDE COUNTY TO CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARDS OBJECTIVES: )' Participate in a community information program that effectively communicates the city's values, expectations and role in code enforcement to the Vail Ranch homeowners Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Code Enforcement concerns responded to within 3 working days 2,200 2,256 2,342 2,568 Percent of complaints contacted at the close o f cases 100% 99% 100% 100% Percent of weed abatement activities commenced by May 1 100% 100% 100% 100% Percent of resource information made available to the public within 24 hours 100% 99% 100% 100% 49 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: BUILDING SERVICES MISSION: The Building Services Program is responsible for enforcing the City's Building and Safety codes; performing plan checks on construction documentation to ensure that project proposals meet City codes; distributing plans for review by other agencies or City departments; issuing building permits; completing final inspections; and issuing certificates of occupancy. The program also performs special inspections; implements certain state laws such as the California Disabled Access Regulations; is responsible for updating Building and Fire codes required by the State of California; provides guidance to the general public and development community regarding the Uniform Building Codes and project applications; and is responsible for inspections of private development projects, construction within the public right-of-way exclusive of capital projects, and erosion control enforcement. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Incorporated Planning review of submitted plans for construction within 10-12 working days as part of concurrent plan review process for new construction projects · Initiated mentoring program for personnel to support professional development GOAL l: PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE BUILDING AND FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCALLY MANDATED BUILDING RELATED CODES FOR ALL NEW AND REMODEL PERMIT APPLICATIONS OBJECTIVES: ~, Provide initial plan review comments and conditions within 10-12 working days from the date of submittal ~- Provide complete in house plan review on minor tenant improvement, non-s~ructural additions and remodel permit applications ~' Provide review of resubmitted plans in a 5 to 7 working day period GOAL 2: ENSURE THE TIMELY ISSUANCE OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PERM1TS OBJECTIVES: ~ Enhance the City's permit issuance and tracking sof~ware by implementing workflow to increase efficiency in the processing and issuance of building related permits ~ Utilize new software to increase efficiency in departmental communication network to obtain final approval for building permit issuance ~ Increase efficiency at counter by processing multiple permits } Utilize appointments for the issuance of tract and multiple permits DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOAL 3: PERFORM EFFICENT AND TIMELY BUILDING INSPECTIONS FOR ALL TYPES OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY OBJECTIVES: )~ Respond to inspection requests within 24 hours of receipt ~ Create inspection teams to increase inspection efficiency and decreased travel time ~' Perform unrequested inspections for builders/developers as time allows ~' Utilize appointments for the issuance of tract and multiple permits GOAL 4: PROVIDE RESPONSIVE ASSISTANCE TO THE PUBLIC OBJECTIVES: } Provide construction-related information as an "over the counter" service to the public )~ Ensure inspectors have time allocated to respond to customer questions } Provide informational site inspections to homeowners performing home projects } Conduct bi-annual workshops for active developers within the City of Temecula ~ Maintain inventory of construction standard handouts and code documents for the public ~ Address customer concerns and complaints within three days of receipt Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Percent of initial plan reviews within 12 working days 100% 100% 100% 100% Percent of residential plan re-review 5 to 7 working days 100% 100% 100% 100% Percent of commercial plan re-review with 7 to 10 working days 100% 100% 100% 100% Building related permits issued 2,500 3,386 3,000 3,000 Percent of combination building inspections performed within 24 hours 100% 100% 100% 100% Combination building inspections performed 26,000 48,511 36,000 50,000 Number of unrequested "bonus" inspections performed 600 1,000 1,000 2,000 Certificates of Occupancy inspections performed 100 224 100 120 Workshops provided for active developers within the City 2 2 2 4 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: LAND DEVELOPMENT MISSION: The Land Development Division provides for the review and engineering approvals of all private development and subdivisions within the City to ensure compliance with the subdivision map act, NPDES, FEMA, City codes, ordinances and policies. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Reviewed and processed numerous residential and commercial development including subdivision maps, boundary adjustments, encroachment permits, grading regulations, plan check, field inspection, and related ordinance preparation · Reviewed and conditioned major projects that include the Harveston, Wolf Creek and Roripaugh Specific Plans · Coordinated the transfer of Engineering documents and map files from Riverside County for new annexation of Vail Ranch area GOAL 1: PROPERLY ADMINISTER THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL MANDATES OBJECTIVES: > Ensure special design and construction projects are completed within specified time frames Respond to other agency inquiries timely to resolve all issues Ensure construction compliance throughout the community on land development projects Implement NPDES and FEMA review and oversight program Implement in-house surveying, mapping and monumentation capabilities and increase in-house plan check and review ~' Implement Assessment District Etlgineering Program GOAL 2: PROVIDE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE AND EXCEPTIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE THROUGH COUNTER DUTY, TELEPHONE AND FIELD INSPECTIONS OBJECTIVES: > Ensure that all inquiries and inspections are satisfactory completed in a helpful and expeditious manner > Complete cataloguing of all Engineering plans to LaserFiche for easier and improved accessibility to these documents > Tie City/County Benchmark Log to G.I.S. for easy reference GOAL3: ENSURE ALL DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES ARE TRAINED FOR THEIR RESPECITVE TASKS OBJECTIVES: Provide a challenging work environment where staff have opportunities for career development through training and education · Provide effective leadership with open lines of communication between all Divisions DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY' 2002-03 First plan check turnaround time 3 weeks 5 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks* Subsequent plan checks turnaround time 2 weeks 3 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks* Map changes turnaround time 2 weeks 4 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks* Development review turnaround time 2 weeks 4 weeks 2 weeks 2 weeks* Use permits turnaround time I week 2 weeks 1 week 1 week* * These performance measures are maintained ifprnposed staffing levels are attained. DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIRF. CTOR OF PUBLIC WORI~ CITY £NGINEE~ Bill Hughes DEPUTY DIRECfOR OF pIJ~UC ;VORKS - MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC AD,fiNIS]RAt]ON/ CAPITAL PROJECTS lAND F~ GINE~,ING S~ECIAL PROJECIS AD~NIS]RA]IO~ DEVFLO~b~IENGINff~ING+ --Pavement 5hna~: --Tr~11¢ Co~ssim .-Cir~/Coandl Cooniutir~ Cora~i~les --~jm ~e}0p~m ~M Eve~ ~T~c ~M ~ ~Co~on I~m * Detail info~ation for thc L~d Development program is included in thc Communi~y Development Dcpa~ment 54 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAM: MAINTENANCE MISSION: The Maintenance Program within the Public Works Department is responsible for all maintenance activities associated with the City's streets, drainage facilities, traffic control devices, street trees and parkways, graffiti removal, weed abatement, stenciling/striping, Pavement Management System, pothole patching, and service order requests. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Implemented the "Trees for Temecula" street tree planting program · Assumed right of way maintenance responsibilities for the Vail Ranch annexation area Provided support to numerous City sponsored events, including Holiday parades, Rod Run events, Run for the Cure, Old Town events, and the Balloon & Wine Festival · Provided emergency response for Police, Fire, and utility company emergencies through its after hours call-out program · Maintained 375 miles of public right of way, including related drainage systems, tree trimming, graffiti removal, and weed abatement · Continued to provide a pro-active and responsive citywide maintenance and emergency response program to facilitate the growing needs of the community GOAL 1: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR THE COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES: ~ Respond to all service order requests within a 24-hour period ~ Ensure service requests requiring emergency repairs are completed within 48-hours ~ Remove graffiti within a 24-hour period ~ Implement a Pavement Management System that addresses a minimum of 85% of all pavement projects ~' Routinely re-stencil Citywide, and inventory and record re-stencil legends monthly ~ To continue improvement of our routine and major maintenance programs GOAL 2: PROMOTE EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT, PARTICIPATION AND INITIATIVE OBJECTIVES: ~ To continue to allow our staff to better their education and job knowledge by attending necessary training courses ~ To continuously upgrade our response and field procedures for emergency situations such as accidents, floods, wind, etc. To continue to instn~ct staff in the advancement of new and improved methods of maintaining and repairing roads as it becomes available DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of service order responses 1,584 463 2,000 1,500 Number of legends stenciled 7,000 2,665 7,700 6,000 Number of street signs replaced 281 583 500 500 Number of catch basins cleaned 1,094 2,344 2,500 4,000 Number of street trees trimmed 205 214 250 300 Number of street trees replaced 50 400 700 600 Number of right of way weeds abated 232,461 211,117 225,000 225,000 Square feet of graffiti removed 16,364 24,993 25,000 28,000 Square feet of P.C.C. side walks/curb and gutter repaired 1,465 17,109 20,000 20,000 Miles of City streets slurry sealed 19 18 18 18 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAM: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MISSION: The Traffic Engineering Program is responsible for all daily traffic related operations and safety issues as well as well as future transportation planning and circulation management plans. This program is responsible for the collection and analysis of traffic volumes, accident reports, speed studies, traffic device inventories, maintenance and timing of existing traffic signals, and establishing future traffic signal priorities. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Investigated and evaluated the practicability implementing a Red Light Enforcement Program Y · Conducted approximately 100 citizen generated traffic investigations that resulted in 85 work orders The Citywide traffic census program was updated to include 13 new segment locations and 4 master count locations, for a total of 121 traffic monitoring locations Enhanced traffic safety by installing "Stop Time" buttons that allow emergency personnel to override signal operations during special events. Provided timely review of plans to ensure compliance Optimized traffic signal coordination on Winchester and Rancho California Roads to optimize circulation and reduce traffic congestion · Implemented geometric changes at various locations and installed traffic signals to reduce congestion and improve safety · Provided technical assistance for special events to ensure mitigation measures were implemented to enhance safety and traffic circulation GOAL I: COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF CLOSED CIRUCIT TRAFFlC CAMERAS AND THE TRAFFIC OPERATION CENTER 1N CITY HALL OBJECTIVES: ~ Monitor traffic conditions and traffic signal operation on the City's major arterials; respond to congestion and incident by modifying traffic signal operation and ensure that coordination system is operating properly ~ Coordinate incident management on Interstate 15 with City program GOAL2: ENSURE OPTIMAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION THROUGHOUT THE CITY THROUGH PROPER MAINTENANCE OF STREETS AND SIGNALS, AND MONITORING OF CONDITIONS TO IDENTIFY AREAS OF CONCERN OBJECTIVES: ~ Conduct timely investigation of traffic incidents to identify preventive measures ~ Maintain the Citywide traffic census program to monitor traffic circulation patterns and develop growth management strategies ~ Provide ongoing review of traffic conditions at major intersections to ensure optimal circulation and safety ~ Provide adequate mitigation at special events ~ Provide timely review of all construction plans to ensure compliance ~' Maintain the City's Traffic Signal System to ensure that traffic signals and synchronization system are operating properly and providing optimal circulation DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS GOAL 3: PROACTIVELY MITIGATE POTENTIAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ISSUES OBJECTIVES: ~ Enhance the responsiveness to traffic congestion ~' Monitor City's intersections during peak hours and respond to congestion issues in a timely manner in cooperation with Caltrans >' Review/monitor activities and special events to ensure adequate mitigation measures are provided Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Days to complete traffic investigations 10 10 10 I 0 Traffic signals reviewed for timing 100% 100% 100% 100% Days to complete plan reviews 10 6 l0 10 58 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAM: ADMINISTRATION AND SPECIAL PROJECTS M1SSION: The Administration and Special Projects Program is responsible for providing coordination with other agencies and organizations involved in transportation~ flood control, sanitary sewer, and water distribution. This Division represents the City at technical advisory committee meetings involving the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the Western Riverside Council of Governments on issues concerning federal funding, air quality, and congestion management. Additionally, the Division is involved in the Water Planning Task Force, various Santa Margarita Watershed groups, and the Joint Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee. The Division also tracts division budgets, and coordinates all programs within the Public Works Department. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Obtained $4.0 million in Federal Public Land and Highways Funding for the permanent Pala Road street and drainage improvements Obtained $141,000 in Energy Commission Funding to retrofit all signal lighting with Light Emitting Diodes Received the American Public Works Association 2001 Project of the Year Award for the Pala Road Bridge Project Established the City's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program pursuant to Federal Department of Transportation Regulations GOAL i: PROVIDE A CENTRALIZED SUPPORT CENTER TO ENSURE THE EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION OF ALL PUBLIC WORKS FUNCTIONS OBJECTIVES: > Ensure all Public Works divisions comply with the adopted annual operating budget by tracking all purchase orders and expenditure reports )~ Process timely requests for information and/or Public Works inquiries within 72 hours } Evaluate program policies and procedures to ensure operational plan meets stated goals GOAL 2: MAINTAIN ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL GROUPS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE MANDATES OBJECTIVES: ~' Attend monthly Riverside County Transportation Technical Advisory Committee and Western Regional Council of Governments Technical Advisory Committee to ensure participation in all federal grant programs } Coordinate with the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) in the administration of RT1P funding for Public Works projects } Communicate with federal agencies to ensure conformance with federally mandated regional policies > Meet with City of Murrieta to coordinate traffic issues DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAM: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION MISSION: The Capital Improvement Program will implement the City's Capital Improvement Projects at the scheduled time, within the approved budget, and with minimal disruptions and inconvenience to the residents of Temecula and the public at large. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Coordinated the planning, design and/or construction of more than 35 Capital Projects, including the Old Town First Street Bridge, Pala Road Bridge Median Landscape, Low Flow Crossing, Margarita Road Widening, Light Emitting Diode Traffic Signal Conversion, Starlight Ridge Sidewalk, Maintenance Building Renovation, Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station, Senior Center Expansion, and the Chaparral High School Swimming Pool Implemented procedure manual for the Capital Improvement Project Division Implemented stafftrainiog program for providing in-house design of small projects Coordinated utility meetings with appropriate agencies to address issues pertaining to City and utility projects Increased project tracking efficiency of staff time expenditures through the Project Hours Tracking System GOAL I: PROVIDE TIMELY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CIRCULATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY'S ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES: ~' Update the Capital Improvement Program annually, including a comprehensive review o£ projects; initial cost estimates based on available and projected revenues; project timeliness; and project prioritization Design and construct proposed projects within funding and time guidelines as set forth in the Capital Improvement Program document GOAL2: PROVIDE A TURNKEY CONTRACT MANAGEMENT OPERATION FROM PREPARING REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS TO CONTRACT CLOSEOUT OBJECTIVES: ~' Ensure timely and thorough project initiation, design, and complete all associated tasks ~' Ensure compliance with all requirements of the public bidding process >' Provide timely review of plans and specifications ~' Maintain communication with all parties involved in Public Works projects ~' Provide timely and thorough inspections of construction projects GOAL 3: PROVIDE EXCELLENCE IN CONTRACT MANAGEMENT OPERATION FROM PLANNING TO CONTRACT CLOSEOUT OBJECTIVES: ~ Improve citizen satisfaction with construction impacts Provide accurate and timely coordination while developing and implementing the City's Capital Improvement Program DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS GOAL 4: CHARGE ACCURATE HOURS TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TO PROPERLY REFLECT ACTUAL STAFFING RESOURCES UTILIZED OBJECTIVES: ~ Continue using the work hours form developed Continue tabulating hours for the engineers and charging it to the appropriate project budget GOAL 5: COORDINATE, DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ON SCHEDULE AND WITHIN BUDGET OBJECTIVES: ~' Develop accurate estimates of capital improvement projects } Develop realistic schedules for capital improvement projects using Microsoft Projects software ~' Implement measures to keep budget and schedule in line Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000~01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 i~¥ 2002-03 Total capital project costs incurred $26,000,000 $17,250,000 $44,561,770 $45,000,000 Percent of projects completed under budget 95% 95% 95% 95% Percent of projects completed on schedule 95% 95% 95% 95% Percent completed project budget expended for project management 8.5% 12% 9.5% 15% 61 DEPARTMENT: POLICE POLICE CHIEF Jim Domenoe I I I I POLICE LIEUTENANT ' POLICE !,IEUTENANT POLICE LIEUTENANT Darryl Birney Paula Burch John Hngd Investigations Patrol Special Teams and Services and Adnfinistratien Traffic Team --Detectives --Patrol Officers --Crime Prvention Unit --Volunteers --K-9 Officer mSchool Resource Unit ~CAP Program --Community Service Officers --POP Teams/Satellite Offices ~Administrative Support --Special Enforcement Team ~Traffic Enforcement --Special Event Planning --Accident Investigations 62 DEPARTMENT: POLICE PROGRAM: POLICE ADMINISTRATION MISSION: The City contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department for police services. The Police Administration Program is responsible for providing leadership, direction and general administrative support required for effective and efficient law enforcement. The program also includes budget coordination and management, personnel and payroll administration, planning, organizational development and community support. Additionally, this program ensures cooperation between the Police Department and the City Manager, other departments, and City Council. The Police Administration Program is also responsible for overseeing volunteer support services, with an emphasis on office and logistics support. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Added sworn lieutenant to assist in the administrative functions of the police department. Added personnel to support patrol needs for the Vail Ranch area Continued to provide clerical and volunteer support to enhance field operations Began the Community Action Patrol program utilizing citizen volunteers GOAL: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM TO ENSURE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT FOR TEMECULA'S RESIDENTS OBJECTIVES: ~ Conduct ongoing recruitment of volunteers for the Police Department to support administrative operations, logistics program, juvenile court program and to assist law enforcement personnel at community events throughout the year } Ensure officer compliance with mandated training as directed by California P.O.S.T. } Provide Police Department representation at appropriate meetings Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of volunteers recruited 25 25 20 25 P.O.S.T. Training Compliance 100% 100% 100% 100% Percent of City Council and Traffic/Public Safety Commission Meetings attended 100% 100% 100% 100% DEPARTMENT: POLICE PROGRAM: PATROL SERVICES MISSION: The Patrol Services Program provides first responders to law enforcement related public safety requests. The program is divided into three areas: General Patrol, Traffic Services and Special Teams. Patrol Officers are responsible for maintaining safety and order in the community. Patrol staff is involved in focused efforts to reduce crime, which includes general patrol, the utilization of a Police Service Dog, bicycle patrol, and foot patrol. A part of this component also includes Community Service Officers. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Continued to conduct pro-active patrol activity to address specific crime issues · Continued to respond to requests by the community for information/services Continued to develop community policing techniques across the community · Continued to provide foot and bike patrol to specific regions of the City · Continued to provide extra enfomement during special events · Continued to utilize horseback and ATV patrol when required for special programs Continued to educate the public regarding police issues and programs when possible GOAL: ENSURE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES: ~' Consistently maintain a visible and proactive law enforcement program ~ Respond to calls for service in a timely manner ~ Enforce laws and ordinances to ensure public safety Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of general patrol officer hours provided per day 134.0 133.0 136.5 136.5 Response time for Priority 1 calls 5.9 minutes 5.5 minutes 5.8 minutes 6.0 minutes Response time for Priority 2 calls 7.3 minutes 8.7 minutes 7.1 minutes 9.0 minutes DEPARTMENT: POLICE PROGRAM: SPECIAL TEAMS MISSION: The Special Teams Program provides a focused, cooperative effort to reduce crime by utilizing the full resources of the community to address the problem. This program encompasses the Community Orientated Policing philosophy. Special Teams units' proactive target areas include crime reduction in multi-housing areas, street level narcotic enforcement, off-road vehicle programs, anti-graffiti programs and juvenile offender programs. Special Teams units work with community, county and allied agencies to assist them in a long term approach to solving crime through educational programs, and enforcement. This program is also responsible for the School Resource Officers, who serve the Temecula Unified School District. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Continued working established programs with existing special teams · Continued improving working relationship between SRO's and TVUSD · Continued to work with at-risk youth through JOLT Program · Recruited 70% of the apartment complexes to join "Crime Free" Multi-Housing Project · Continued to actively work with the business community and provide educational seminars related to criminal activity · Continued training Promenade Mall employees in criminal identification / detection · Continued to work with great success in fostering a multi-agency approach to solving juvenile crime and delinquency through the JOLT Program · Worked special holiday season enforcement programs to safeguard shopping areas · Implemented narcotic search warrant program to recover contraband and conduct narcotic-related arrests · Continued to promote new concepts and programs for community policing, such as the off-road vehicle program GOAL: ENSURE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES: ~ Conduct proactive enforcement in identified target areas for specific crime problems and or traffc enforcement issues to include special teams and traffic team personnel ~ Provide public education in crime prevention, traffic education and public safety matters ~ Provide intervention and diversion programs focused on reducing juvenile crime DEPARTMENT: POLICE Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Number of special programs implemented 100 120 I 12 140 Number of programs conducted 160 192 172 192 Number of crime prevention workshops attended 25 52 28 50 Number of security surveys conducted 196 219 200 225 Number of businesses visited 239 334 250 325 Number of businesses visited for follow-up 187 282 200 300 Number of business watch articles prepared 12 12 12 12 Hours dedicated to graffiti prevention 400 400 400 400 DEPARTMENT: POLICE PROGRAM: INVESTIGATIONS BUREAU MISSION: The Investigations Bureau conducts follow-up investigation of initial reports handled by Patrol Services. The Investigations Bureau is comprised of a Crimes Against Property Division and a Crimes Against Persons Division. Investigators from either division may also be utilized at times to initiate and complete investigations that are high profile in nature, in order to speed up the investigative process, and provide a single source contact for victims and prosecutors. The Investigations Bureau's focus is to take initial investigations conducted by Patrol Services, and complete the necessary steps that cannot be completed by a field officer, due to time and resources, to ensure the identity and successful prosecution of criminal offenders. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · The Investigations Bureau conducted 726 Follow-up investigations during the year 2001 · Investigated and prosecuted a career criminal burglary suspect for a series of thefts that resulted in the recovery of over $15,000 in merchandise · Investigated and prosecuted a suspect £or attempting to lure a child into a sexual encounter via the lnternet GOAL: PROVIDE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OBJECTIVES: > Contact victims of crimes in a timely manner ~ Attempt to identity and arrest suspected violators in criminal incidents ~ Conduct Community Training Seminars to maintain open communication between members of the business community and provide awareness of current crime trends and prevention strategies ~ Act as a liaison between the District Attorney's office and the victim(s) to ensure successful prosecution Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 I~Y 2000-01 FV 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Case Closure Rate 65% 63% 67% 67% Open Case Average per Detective 24 22 22 22 Number of Community Seminars Conducted 4 8 6 8 DEPARTMENT: POLICE PROGRAM: TRAFFIC TEAM MISSION: The Traffic Services Team provides enhanced enforcement of traffic laws, issuance of citations and collision investigations throughout the City of Temecula. Collision investigations range from non-injury to fatal and involve the use of accident reconstruction investigators. The officers assigned to the team are highly trained in the use of radar, accident investigation and the detection of drivers under the influence of narcotics or alcohol through the use of high profile enforcement techniques and public education. The team also conducts monthly sobriety checkpoints referred to as operation ERACIT, (Enforce Responsible Alcohol Consumption in Temecula). This program also focuses on various alcohol-related offenses involving minors. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Continued to work specialized traffic enforcement when necessary Continued the ERACIT Program using both fixed and roving checkpoints · Facilitated the annual Rod Run, Rod Run Revisited, 4~h of July Parade and Christmas Light Parade with success Facilitated the "Race For the Cure" event at the Promenade Mall Facilitated numerous other community events and activities that impact traffic flow, such as the Triathlon event GOAL: ENSURE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES: ~ Conduct proactive enforcement in identified target areas for specific traffic enforcement issues Reduce the number of injury traffic collisions through enforcement and public education in traffic, pedestrian and bicycle safety ~ Provide traffic control measures to ensure public safety and orderly traffic flow at special events within the city Reduce the number of DUI related traffic collisions through directed enforcement and public education Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 200t-02 FY 2002-03 Number of citations issued for hazardous violations 8,800 5,308 9,100 9,600 Number of DUI arrests 396 375 450 450 Number of ERACIT Checkpoints conducted 12 10 12 12 DEPARTMENT: FIRE ACTING FIRE CHIEF Howard Windsor I I I FIRE EMERGENCY PREVENTION RESPONSE Information and Education -- Fire Suppression Planning and Engineering ~ Emergency Medical Services Investigation B All Risk Responses Enforcement ~ Non Response Activities DEPARTMENT: FIRE PROGRAM: PREVENTION MISSION: The mission of the Temecula Fire Services Fire Prevention Bureau is to preserve and enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Temecula through the application of a comprehensive fire and hazard prevention program. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Designed and disseminated check-off sheets to facilitate plan checking and inspections Held a developer/contractor workshop to introduce plan check and inspection practices and procedures · Added a vehicle to the Prevention fleet to improve inspection times Continued to improve upon project submittal and review system coordinating with Building and Safety to reduce turnaround times Evaluated additional Fire Protection Et~gineering firms to assist with inspections and plan checks during high volume periods Held Fire Prevention Week activities for the community · Resolved outstanding issues with the fire alarm system at the Promenade Mall · Began Citywide evaluation and review of buildings with outstanding issues · Designed new filing system for department inspection records GOAL I: CONDUCT AN ONGOING, PERPETUAL PUBL1C INFORMATION AND EDUCATION PROGRAM OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY WITH A STRONG FOCUS ON FIRE PREVENTION OBJECTIVES: ~' Educate citizens of all ages in proper fire and life safety practices ~' Begin Adopt-a-School program by fire stations ~' Purchase, stock, and distribute an adequate supply of handouts with fire and life safety messages to the stations for dissemination at fairs and during station tours ~ Participate in existing Fire and Safety Expos ~ Institute smoke detector and battery checks/change program in all residences while on responses at those residences Continue development and distribution of the "After the Fire" Packet Develop new forums for public contacts including merchant booths and radio spots Expand public education efforts to include All Risk Evaluate and purchase technological delivery messages for prevention education DEPARTMENT: FIRE GOAL 2: OPTIMIZE THE FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY ENVIRONMENTS IN ALL BUILDINGS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH PLANNING AND APPLICATION OF THE APPROPRIATE CODES OBJECTIVES: ~' Implement HazMat Permitting program ~ Improve material handling/storage through porchase of a connex container for files and prevention materials storage )~ Shorten turn around on paperwork and clerical support ~ Continue refinement of plan submittal & review processes to maintain timely turn arounds by increasing computerized submittal and tracking capabilities for integrated departmental access, improving filing capabilities/capacities, and providing website information for developers/contractors ~' Improve staff knowledge base through education and training GOAL 3: ENSURE A REASONABLE DEGREE OF LIFE SAFETY IN ALL BUILDINGS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH ENFORCEMENT OF, AND COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS OBJECTIVES: ~' Provide in-depth inspections of new construction in a timely fashion ~' Improve inspection scheduling, reduce contractor wait times 3, Perform Hazardous Occupancy inspection with a fire protection engineering firm ~ Continue apartment complex inspections ~ Provide in-depth inspections of current occupancies ~ Educate and assist engine companies in inspection practices GOAL 4: DETERMINE THE ORIGIN AND CAUSE OF ALL FIRES OBJECTIVES: ~ Investigate all fires to ascertain origin and cause ~' Track trends and patterns for serial and/or suspicious fires, coordinating with CDF Law Enforcement at Perris Headquarters )~ Coordinate with Building and Safety, Planning, and Public Works for any fires related to construction and/or development issues Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-0,~ Number of businesses inspected 2,200 1,800 2,200 2,400 Number of plan checks 1,900 1,087 1,900 2,000 Number of Fire Prevention Bureau inspections 2,150 1,072 2,150 2,350 Administrative project hours for plan checks N/A N/A 150 200 DEPARTMENT: FIRE PROGRAM: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS MISSION: The Temecula Fire Services are dedicated to protect life, property, and the environment throughout the City, accomplished by a comprehensive emergency service response program utilizing responsible fiscal management, a highly trained work force, progressive technology and modern equipment. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Developed a Comprehensive Fire/EMS master plan to address all current and future development factors that could affect the City's fire delivery services and needs Tested laptops/software for enhancing emergency response and management Successfully met the goals and objectives set forth by the City for the F.A,S.T. program of 4.46 average response time · Purchased second Medic Squad for implementation of second unit on July 1, 2002 Participated in multiple community oriented events Recruited and qualified 25 new volunteers through the Battalion training academy · The Temecula Fire Explorer Post earned several awards including first place at the Southern California Muster competition GOAL 1: SAFELY RESPOND TO AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS ON ALL FIRES, MINIMIZING THE LOSS OF LIFE AND PROPERTY TO THE CITIZENS OF TEMECULA, ARRIVING IN 5 MINUTES OR LESS 90% OF THE TIME OBJECTIVES: ~ Maintain 5-minute service level as the City grows geographically and demographically } Apply extinguishing agent in 7-8 minutes (prior to flashover) } Full first alarm assignment in operation in 10 minutes ~' Provide 15 personnel to first alarm assignments as dictated by NFPA 1710 } Utilize on-board laptops to enhance fire service delivery capabilities ~' Maintain and replace equipment as needed to maintain operational readiness Maintain appropriate training levels and fire performance standards GOAL 2: SAFELY RESPOND TO AND TAKE APPROPRIATE MITIGATING ACTIONS ON MEDICAL EMERGENCIES, MINIMIZING THE LOSS OF LIFE AND LIMB TO THE CITIZENS OF TEMECULA, ARRIVING IN 5 MINUTES OR LESS 90% OF THE TIME OBJECTIVES: >' Maintain 5-minute service level as the City grows geographically and demographically ~- Initiate definitive patient care within 6-8 minutes )' Provide 2 Paramedic and 2 EMT level personnel on scene ~' Utilize on-board laptops to enhance fire service/EMS delivery capabilities > Maintain and replace equipment as needed to maintain operational readiness ~ Maintain appropriate training levels and EMS certifications )~ Implement next phase of laptop project DEPARTMENT: FIRE GOAL3: RESPOND TO AND TAKE APPROPRIATE MITIGATING ACTIONS ON ALL OTHER EMERGENCY INCIDENTS TO REDUCE THREATS TO THE CITIZENS OF TEMECULA, ARRIVING IN 5 MINUTES OR LESS 90% OF THE TIME OBJECTIVES: > Utilize on-board laptops with response/G.I.S, applications to enhance fire service delivery capabilities ~' Maintain All Risk equipment as needed for operational readiness > Maintain appropriate All Risk technical training levels GOAL 4: PERFORM NECESSARY TRAINING, MAINTENANCE, AND ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES THAT ENSURE AND ENHANCE THE DEPARTMENT'S FIRE SERVICE DELIVERY CAPABILITIES TO THE CITIZENS OF TEMECULA OBJECTIVES: > Maintain facilities and equipment in accordance with department policy > Perform daily/weekly training, drills, and classes consistent with department policy > Perform daily physical fitness program consistent with department policy > Coordinate with the prevention bureau to participate in the field component of the Fire Prevention Program, focusing on information, education, inspections, public relations, and community oriented events > Provide structured Volunteer Fire Company and Explorer training Continue implemenlation of the Injury Illness Prevention Program as required by federal and state mandates as it pertains to all areas of safety Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Average response time 4.50 minutes 4.46 minutes 5.0 minutes 5 minutes Number of business pre-fire plans prepared and updated 750 300 750 750 DEPARTMENT: ANIMAL CONTROL MISSION: The City of Temecula receives animal control services from Lake EIsinore Animal Friends (L.E.A.F.), a non-profit agency dedicated to fulfilling the animal control needs through contractual agreements. L.E.A.F. monitors dog licensing, patrols City neighborhoods, and ensures the safety of not only Temecula residents, but also animals found and detained from this area. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Successfully developed "Animal Friends" television show which available animals are featured in an effort to promote adoptions · Continue to operate satellite adoption shows every weekend · Continue to successfully operate license inspection program GOAL I: PROVIDE EFFECTIVE AN1MAL CONTROL SERVICE TO PROVIDE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT FOR TEMECULA RESIDENTS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CITY'S ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION OBJECTIVES: ~ Routinely patrol neighborhoods to ensure that animals are properly contained ~ Respond to citizen complains regarding barking, dangerous, or vicious dogs ~ Monitor the City's dog licensing program to ensure timely processing ~' Provide a safe and clean shelter facility for detained animals Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002~03 Number of new licenses issued 1,500 1,806 1,500 1,500 Number of license renewals issued 1,925 1,255 2,000 2,000 Number of administrative hearings conducted 15 13 15 17 NON-DEPARTMENTAL MISSION: The Non-Departmental Program is a cost center for general administrative expenditures such as sales tax reimbursements, the "Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula' REST program and property tax administrative fees. FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY - INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Operations Capital Operating Fund Personnel & Maintenance Outlay Transfers Total Insurance $ 43,560 $ 476,200 $ $ 519,760 Vehicles 208,000 208,000 Information Systems 450,270 898,560 1,348,830 Suppor~ Services ! 07,650 184,520 292,170 Facilities 294,000 234,650 $ 11,000 539,650 Total $ $95,480 $ 2,001,930 $ 11,000 $ $ 2,908,410 Facilities Insurance $539,650~ ~ $519,760 Sup~r9t2~e~ices'~ ~ ~ Information Systems $1,348,830 EXPENDITURE BY DEPARTMENT: INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Four Year Comparison Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed INSURANCE FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2001-02 Personnel $ 28,486 $ 31,126 $ 37,350 $ 43,560 Operations & Maintenance 504,673 492,798 502,550 476,200 Capital Outlay Operating Transfers Out 400,000 Total $ 533,159 $ 523,924 $ 539,900 $ 519,760 VEHICLES Personnel Operations & Maintenance $ 107,913 $ 126,194 $ 160,600 $ 208,000 Capital Outlay Total $ 107,913 $ 126,194 $ 160,600 $ 208,000 INFORMATION SYSTEMS Personnel $ 234,646 $ 285,970 $ 340,420 $ 450,270 Operations & Maintenance 606,086 707,368 837,384 898,560 Capitol Outlay Total $ 840,732 $ 993,338 $ 1,177,804 $ 1,348,830 SUPPORT SERVICES Personnel $ 72,175 $ 79,104 $ 92,860 $ 107,650 Operations & Maintenance 163,590 187,610 181,065 184,520 Capital Outlay Total $ 235,765 $ 266,714 $ 273,925 $ 292,170 FACILITIES Personnel $ 185,609 $ 197,763 $ 259,090 $ 294,000 Operations & Maintenance 160,236 165,784 231,220 234,650 Capital Outlay 14,218 7,729 12,537 11,000 Total $ 360,063 $ 371,276 $ 502,847 $ 539,650 Internal Service Fund Total $ 2,077,632 $ 2,281,446 $ 2,655,076 $ 2,908,410 77 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS Authorized Authorized INSURANCE 2001-02 Changes 2002-03 Fiscal Services Manager 0.25 0.00 0.25 Administrative Secretary 0.25 0.00 0.25 Total 0.50 0.00 0.50 INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Systems Manager 0.00 1.00 1.00 In£ormation Systems Administrator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Information Systems Specialist 2.00 0.00 2.00 Web Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 4.00 1.00 5.00 SUPPORT SERVICES Central Services Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 0.50 0.00 0.50 Total 1.50 0.00 1.50 FACILITIES Maintenance Superintendent 0.25 0.00 0.25 Maintenance Supervisor 0.30 0.00 0.30 Facility Maintenance Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 0.50 0.00 0.50 Maintenance Worker 0.50 0.00 0.50 Custodian 0.00 1.00 1.00 Office Specialist 0.30 0.00 0.30 Total 2.85 1.00 3.85 Internal Service Funds Total 8.85 2.00 10.85 78 INSURANCE MISSION: The Insurance Fund is the cost center for thc financing and accounting of the City's risk management and insurance functions. Costs reflected in the Insurance fund include property, liability, automobile insurance, claims administration services, legal and other costs directly relating to claims and potential litigation. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Renewed the City's liability insurance policy at a very competitive premium Completed a top to bottom review of all machinery and equipment for the property insurance renewal · The City once again did not have any reportable property insurance losses COST ALLOCATION: Charges to departments are allocated based on the number of full-time equivalent personnel in each department VEHICLES MISSION: The Vehicle Fund is used to account for the acquisition, depreciation and replacement of City vehicles. COST ALLOCATION: Charges to department are calculated based on the actual depreciation charge for vehicles used by each department 8O INFORMATION SYSTEMS M1SSION: The Information Systems Fund is used to account for the acquisition, depreciation, and replacement of computer and communications (i.e. radios and telephone system) equipment. It also serves as the cost center for telephone and radio system service, as well as computer software and other City data processing needs. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Replaced e-mail, web access, and document imaging servers Upgraded the City's primary data switch to provide better connectivity of the City's servers and workstations Assisted with Maintenance Facility and Senior Center Expansions · Installed WorkFlow for Permits Plus to provide improved activity Management Assisted Fire and GIS in the implementation of computers on Fire Equipment to provide better response to emergency calls Upgraded LaserFiche Document Imaging System in preparation of providing public access to records management through the City's Web Site Assisted in the upgrade of the Eden Systems Software Received a Golden Web Award for the third year Comprehensive section on "Public Transportation Options" added to site and submitted for CAPIO and Helen Putnam Awards Addition of numerous interactive and informative information added to the web site to increase users' enjoyment and continuing interest Monthly "Temecula Web Link" column in Neighbors Newsletter GOAL !: IMPROVE ALL INTERNAL BUSINESS PRACTICES AND CUSTOMER SERVICE LEVELS FOR THE ENTIRE CITY OBJECTIVES: ~' Provide all necessary resources to speed the completion of implementation of best- practice automation tools throughout the City, including specialized software such as Eden, LaserFiche and Permits Plus ~ Provide tools to allow City departments to better serve the public, including and especially making more public information available via the Web, while ensuring the safety and security of confidential information Define, test, and implement a new remote-access policy, to meet the needs of staff for all communications methods, including off-site and wireless GOAL2: PROVIDE ALL REQUISITE ASSETS FOR SUPPORTING THE USE OF AUTOMATION TOOLS WITH1N PUBLIC SAFETY AND OTHER IN-FIELD DEPARTMENTS OBJECTIVES: ~ Reliable, trustable, cost-effective wide-area communications to City vehicles ~ Use of tablet and laptop PCs, especially by Fire and Fire Prevention ~ Propagating software, system, and GIS updates to in-vehicle systems ~ Integration of portable computers into the larger IS mandate ~ Promote and enable communications between affected departments 81 INFORMATION SYSTEMS GOAL 3: MANAGE FOR GROWTH OBJECTIVES: ~' Create a forward-looking IS Master Plan that covers the next cycle of innovation and system usability Create a data and systems architecture that anticipates and plans for explosive growth in information being managed, stored, and made accessible Build an environment and working relationships, which allow and foster collaborative, secure and manageable use of information between departments Use available communications methods to better serve the public By increasing the productivity of City staff, both in the office and in the field By the creation of a City lntranet page, for disseminating staff-only information By empowering the public to obtain City information, upon request, quickly and easily- either with or without assistance by City staff By providing the tools necessary for the City to regularly and periodically disseminate information to all interested and concerned parties - via email and other means GOAL 4: BECOME BETTER PREPARED FOR DISASTER RECOVERY BY IMPROVING DISASTER COMMUNICATIONS, PREPAREDNESS, AND EOC ACTIVATION OBJECTIVES: ~ Create an IS and communications annex to the City's disaster plan ~' Better coordinate and implement the routine and emergency usage of the City's own radio communications assets ~ Begin deployment if wireless communications for EOC use Establish high-con~dence, high-performance links between City Hall and the CRC/Fire Station 84 complex, which can provide life-safety-quality, resilient communications COST ALLOCATION: Charges to departments are calculated based on the number of computer workstations supported by Information Systems staff in each department Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-~2 FY 2002-03 Computers installed / replaced 45 36 129 Computer training days offered per year 50 10 16 20 Information systems requests responded to 2,800 1,000 1,200 1,400 SUPPORT SERVICES MISSION: The Support Services Fund is the cost center for central duplicating services, the mailroom, receiving, and copy equipment maintenance for City Hall. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Completed a £ormal RFP process and awarded a contract to a new vendor for all copying equipment · Continued to develop the support services manual which will include specifics with regard to mail, copying, and other available services Continued to provide efficient and timely customer service in light o£ the increased demands on the division include copying, mailroom, and other services · Increased downstairs reception coverage in an effort to provide additional internal/external customer service GOAL 1: COMPLETE A CENTRAL SERVICES DIVISION MANUAL TO ASSIST IN THE CONTINUATION OF EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE CUSTOMER SERVICE TO BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CUSTOMERS OBJECTIVES: ~ Introduce and present the manual to each administrative secretary o£ each department for review and input Present the completed manual to each department at a departmental staff meeting to ensure compliance and understanding by all departments SUPPORT SERVICES GOAL 2: INITIATE AN RFP PROCESS FOR CITY HALL PAPER PRODUCTS TO ENSURE COST EFFECTIVENESS OBJECTIVES: ~' Begin the RFP process in July and award a contract by September 30, 2002 GOAL3: PROVIDE A FULLY STAFFED DOWNSTAIRS LOBBY AREA IN ORDER TO FURTHER ENHANCE THE CITY'S EFFORTS TOWARD CUSTOMER SERVICE OBJECTIVES: } Modify the downstairs lobby area >' Install a kiosk with internet and Laserfiche Web link access for public use } Provide staffing during business hours for public assistance COST ALLOCATION: Charges to departments are calculated based on the number of color and regular copies made by each department, as well as on the number of on-site personnel for each department Projected Actual Projected Projected PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2000-01 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Computers installed / replaced 26 45 36 129 Computer training days offered per year 50 l0 16 20 Information systems requests responded to 2,800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Number of service request slips submitted to copy center N/A N/A 2,600 3,000 Turn-around period for copy center requests N/A 48 hours 48 hours 48 hours FACILITIES MISSION: The Facilities Fund is used to account for the cost of operating and maintaining City Hall and City Maintenance Facility. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Painted Exterior of City Hall Re-keyed City Hall to new master system including Maintenance Facility addition Installed eight (8) new 400-watt HPS lights to increase City Hall parking lot lighting · Added lights and electrical outlets for Fire Department's new storage area Installed new landscape lighting on the palm trees at the entrance to City Hall · Upgraded fire / security system to service the new additions to the Maintenance Facility · Added fire sprinkler heads in the Maintenance Facility to comply with fire inspection Painted Exterior of City Hall Installed eight (8) new 400-watt HPS lights to increase City Hall parking lot lighting Added lights and electrical outlets for Fire Department's new storage area COST ALLOCATION: Charges to departments are calculated based on the square footage of space utilized by each department at City Hall and the City Maintenance Facility 85 FISCAL YEAR 2002-03 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND OPERATING BUDGET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT Program: Community Development Block Grant Funding Source: Community Development Block Grants Actual Actual Budgeted Projected Expenditure Summary FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 Personnel Operations & Maintenance $ 42,750 $ 45,700 $ 58,000 $ 52,893 Capital Outlay Operating Transfer Out 111,677 129,866 696,300 72,500 $ 154,427 $ 175,566 $ 754,300 $ 125,393 86 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MISSION: The Community Development Block Grant Program is a mechanism for providing federal funding for local projects. The Program is administered through the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. 2001-2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: · Processed over $616,000 in Community Development Block Grant reimbursements for the Mary Phillips Senior Center expansion project · Received a total of $352,623 in Community Development Block Grant funding Provided Community Development Block Grant funding to nine non-profit public service organizations in the community GOAL 1: PROVIDE DIRECT BENEFIT TO LOW-TO-MODERATE INCOME PERSONS OF THE COMMUNITY IN ORDER TO PREVENT AND ELIMINATE SLUM OR BLIGHT. THE PROGRAM GOAL IS ORIENTED TO MEETING A PARTICULAR URGENCY FOR AN EMERGENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEED OBJECTIVES: ~ Conduct public noticing and receive, review and evaluate input ~' Review CDBG applications and make recommendations to the City Council for funding options ~ Submit City council approved applications to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency Prepare and submit program reimbursement and monthly direct benel~t data to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency ITEM 19 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: ~ Shawn Nelson, City Manager DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2003-07 Capital Improvement Program PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~'3~' ~j/ Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services MaY~ager/,/-,,~~'- RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 2003-07 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2002-03. DISCUSSION: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the City's plan for providing public improvements which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are nonrecurring. The proposed CIP document serves as a planning tool for the coordination of financing and scheduling of all capital improvement projects over the next five years. ClP DEVELOPMENT The ClP was developed by taking recommendations provided by the staff and the City Council during a series of workshops. The primary focus of these workshops was to identity community needs in the areas of roads/streets; bridges; public buildings; parks and recreation facilities; and redevelopment projects. All projects were reviewed to ensure consistency with the provisions of the City's General Plan, as well as the long-term vision of the City as developed by the City Council. The Parks and Recreation Commission at their May 13, 2002 meeting reviewed the Parks and Recreation portion of the document and approved the proposed projects. On May 15, 2002 the Planning Commission found the proposed CIP to be consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65403 of the State Planning and Zoning Law. The Planning Commission also recommended the following priority changes: · Butterfield Stage Rd Extension - from III to II or I · Diaz Rd Widening -from III to II or I · Rainbow Canyon Rd Widening from Pala Rd to the City limit - from ill to a II · State Route 79 South Medians - from II to I Finance/Papagg/Budget/CIP 02-06/ClP02 ResoJution. AGN · Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update - from IV to II · Meadowview North City Circulation - from III to II The Public/Traffic Safety Commission at their May 23, 2002 meeting reviewed the Circulation and Infrastructure portion of the document and found it acceptable with a recommendation that the City Council consider addressing the Santiago Overcressing Project in the near future and that it not be postponed indefinitely. On May 29, 2002 the City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the draft CIP. At the workshop the City Council provided direction to staff to allocate additional funding in the first year for median design work on Winchester Road. Also staffwas directed to add two additional projects for City Beautification and the Harveston Park Site. COSTS Overall, the total cost as identified in the CIP is $409,620,646. A total of 112 projects are included in the program, consisting of forty-two (42) Circulation Projects, twenty-two (22) Infrastructure/Other Projects, thirty-seven (37) Park Projects, and eleven (11) Redevelopment Agency/Housing Projects. The following illustrates the associated costs for each project classification and total cost: Project Cost Circulation $254,858,303 Infrastructure/Other Projects $ 93,661,697 Parks $ 48,469,760 RedevelopmentJRDA Housing $ 12,630,886 Total $409,620,646 REVENUE Projected revenue from identified sources for the Five Year Capital Improvement Program is $165,618,739. Through the first two years of the five year program, there is adequate funding for all proposed projects. The CIP is fully funded in FY 2002-03 at $55,272,196 and in FY 2003-04 at $43,546,420. However, for the remaining three years, in the unspecified category, the deficiency begins and continues to increase to the five year total of $249,778,700. Included in this five year plan are twenty-two (22) projects which currently do not fit into the five year window, but warrant consideration and review in this document. These projects are proposed to be funded by both assessment districts and unspecified funds in future years for a total cost of $170,778,900, which is included in the total unspecified amount of $249,778,700. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 2003-07 Five Year Capital Improvement Program establishes the project appropriations for FY 2002-03. Projects which do not have sufficient funds within the funding source will not proceed until the funding has been secured. Attachment: Resolution 2002- Draft Capital Improvement Program 2003-07 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULAAPPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2003-07 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2002-2003 WHEREAS, the City of Temecula requires public infrastructure improvements in the areas of streets, highways, transportation facilities, parks, recreational facilities and public buildings and facilities; and WHEREAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements is necessary so as to best serve the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, in order to prioritize these public infrastructure and improvements, a Capital Improvement Program is necessary; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program FY 2003-07 is hereby approved. A copy of the FY 2003-07 Program will be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City Council has considered relevant environmental factors. Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 2003-07" included herein appropriations for FY 2002-03 is hereby adopted. The CIP appropriations for the 2001-2002 Fiscal Year which have not been completed, encumbered nor included in the FY 2003-2007 CIP are hereby carried over for each applicable project to the Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Section 4. On May 15, 2002 the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65404(c) of State Planning and Zoning Law. Section 5. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action. C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available. D. The City Manager may authorize transfers of up to $25,000 between approved Capital Improvement Program projects. E. Notwithstanding Section 5B, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by Council. Section 6. Mayor Stone abstains with respect to projects within the Old Town area due to property ownership in Old Town Temecula. Section 7. The City Clerk shall cedify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of June 2002. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of June, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~'~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager ~ DATE: June 11, 2002 SUBJECT: Consideration of Preliminary Steps to Explore the Feasibility of a City Municipal Electric Utility (at the request of Council members Naggar and Comerchero) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the approval of additional staff time to explore the feasibility of a City Municipal Electric Utility. BACKGROUND: The Electrical Subcommittee, consisting of Council members Naggar and Comerchero, have met with staff to discuss in concept the feasibility of forming a municipal utility to provide electrical and possibly other utility services. Staff and the Subcommittee have assembled some information from the California Municipal Utilities Association, various cities, and others regarding this issue This is a complex issue, and neither staff nor the Subcommittee have obtained sufficient information to make a formal recommendation to the City Council at this time. However, the Subcommittee does wish to appraise the City Council of their discussions and to obtain Council's authorization to explore this concept further. FISCAL IMPACT: Additional staff time up to approximately 40 hours is expected to continue this conceptual investigation. No direct expenditures are anticipated during this initial study. If additional steps are taken, additional expenses would be incurred related to investigation and due diligence prior to making a final recommendation to the council. Such additional expense would only be incurred if significant potential benefits and revenue to the city was anticipated and the council approved moving forward beyond the first 40 hours. R:\Ogradyj~Agenda Repocls\Elecldc Utility.doc