HomeMy WebLinkAbout012202 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prier to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JANUARY 22, 2002 - 7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 11:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 11:00 P.M.
6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code
Sections:
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b)('1) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With
respect to such matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been
reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based
on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate
litigation.
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the
City. The following case will be discussed: 1) Eddie Roy Elder vs. City of
Temecula.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various partieS
may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2002-02
Resolution: No. 2002-06
Mayor Ron Roberts
James Michael Johnston
Pastor Ron Bolt of People's Church of the Valley
Pack No. 318
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
R:~Agenda\012202
1
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Presentation of the new Rape Crisis Center at Rancho Springs Medical Center
Special Presentation by Jeffrey Bennett and Jan Rudman, City Councilmembers of the City of
Corona, re,qardin,q Fiscal Issues of Concern to Cities
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter no~t listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of December 11, 2001;
2.2 Approve the minutes of December 17, 2001.
R:~Agenda\012202
2
3
4
5
6
Resolution Approvinq List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Community Development Block Grant Application Proposals for FY 2002-03
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding
recommendation from the Finance Committee and staff.
4.2 Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements and to
reprogram CDBG funds from completed projects in accordance with the current
budget resolution for general administration of the Fiscal Year 2002-03 Community
Development Block Grant Funds.
Purchase of one Fire Department Rescue Squad Vehicle
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Authorize the City Manager to submit the request for six additional fire personnel to
the County Department of Fire for staffing the second medic squad beginning July 1,
2002;
5.2 Approve the purchase of one 2002 Ford 550 Cab and Chassis from Rancho Ford
Lincoln Mercury in the amount of $35,831.00;
5.3 Approve the purchase of the Rescue Squad Vehicle Apparatus from KME in the
amount of $67,437.00;
5.4 Authorize a budget transfer from the Fire Operating Budget to the Vehicle Internal
Service Fund for $103,268.00.
2002 Workers Compensation Coveraqe Annual Renewal
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Select State Compensation Insurance Fund as the City's Employee Workers
Compensation Insurance, for Plan Year 2002.
R:~Agenda\012202
3
7
10
Street Name Chanqe from Saric Court to Mountain View
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME FROM SARIC
COURT TO MOUNTAIN VIEW
Needs Assessment for Library Bond Act
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Award a contract in the amount of $34,500.00 to Godbe Research & Analysis (GRA)
for conducting a public opinion needs assessment for receiving Proposition No. 14
funds;
8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed $3,450.00
which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Department of Parks and Recreation Riparian and Riverine Habitat Proqram
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR
GRANT FUNDS FOR THE RIPARIAN AND RIVERINE HABITAT
GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD
PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AN[:) COASTAL
PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000
Resolution of Support - Proposition No. 42 - Transportation Conqestion Improvement Act
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING PROPOSITION NO. 42 -
TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT
R:~Agenda\012202
4
11
Aqreement for Consulting Services between the City of Temecula and Sandra Massa-
Lavitt
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve the contract with Sandra Massa-Lavitt for consulting services for $25,000
for a total contract amount of $50,000 for the fiscal year 2001-02.
12 Proposed Amendment to RDA Pass-Throuqh Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED "AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX
INCREMENT FUNDS FROM THE TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT"
13 Maintenance Bond posted by Vulcan Materials Company - Western Division - as security
for asphalt concrete pavement for the First Street Extension Proiect - PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Accept the Maintenance Bond as security for the asphalt concrete pavement placed
for the First Street Extension Project - PW95-08.
14
Substitute Aqreements and Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract Map No. 23143-7
(located east of Butterfield Staqe Road and Crowne Hill Drive, south of Pauba Road, and
north of Old Kent Road).
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143-7;
14.2 Accept the substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument
Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-7;
14.3 Acknowledge that original bonds collected by the original subdivider will be released
once transfer of title ownership to the new subdivider is complete;
14.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
R:~Agenda\012202
5
15
16
17
Substitute Aqreements and Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract Map No. 23143-9
(located ease of Butterfield Staqe Road, south of Royal Crest Place, and west of Crowne
Hill Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and
labor and materials for Tract Map No. 23143-9;
15.2 Accept the substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument
Bond as security for monumentation for Tract Map No. 23143-9;
15.3 Acknowledge that original bonds collected by the original subdivider will be released
once transfer of title ownership to the new subdivider is complete;
15.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Completion and Acceptance for Pavement Manaqement System (FY2000-2001) - Project
No. PW00-30
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Accept the Pavement Management System (FY2000-2001) - Project No. PW00-30
- as complete;
16.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
16.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
Completion and Acceptance for the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station (Gradinq & Pavin.q) -
Proiect No. PW01-21
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Accept the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station (Grading & Paving) - Project No. PW01-
21 - as complete;
17.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond;
17.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
R:~Agenda\012202
6
18
Second Readin,q of Ordinance No. 02-01 (Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO, 02-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDED ZONING STANDARDS
FOR THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 8
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
AND
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
R:~,genda\012202
7
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2002-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2002-01
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda er on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 17, 2001.
2 Assessment Enqineerinq Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Award a two-year contract in the amount of $20,000.00 for 2002 and up
to $21,800.00 for 2003 to MuniFinancial for providing Assessment Engineering
Services.
R:~Agenda\012202
8
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan.
4 Teen Proqram
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the report regarding the Temecula Teen Council and City-
Sponsored teen programs in Temecula.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, February 12, 2002, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\012202
9
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2002-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2002-01
Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts, Comerchero
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item no~t on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 17, 2001.
2 Proposed Amendment to RDA Pass-Throuqh Aqreement
RECOMMENDATION:
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION RDA NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
"AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~Agenda\012202
10
OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF
TAX INCREMENT FUNDS FROM THE TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT"
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Ne~regularmeeting:Tuesday, Februa~12,2002, CityCouncilChambers, 43200BusinessPark
Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\012202
11
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. TPFA 2002-01
Resolution: No. TPFA 2002-01
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Temecula
Public Financing Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item no~t on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 11, 2001.
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Temecula Public Financing Authority
before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s)
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at
the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to,
the public hearing.
2 Community Facilities District No. 01-02 (Harveston)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Continue the public hearing to the meeting of February 12, 2002.
R:~Agenda\012202
12
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
BOARD MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
R:~Agenda\012202
13
CONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19
Reschedulin,q of March 12, 2002, City Council Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Direct the City Clerk to reschedule the regular City Council Meeting of March 12,
2002, to March 5, 2002, and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing
requirements of the Government Code.
2O
Community Service Fundin,q Pro,qram
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Approve the 2001-02 Community Service Funding Program grants per the table
outlining the Committee's recommendations of 43 organizations, totaling
$125,500.00.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next workshop meeting: City Council, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 5:30 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, for the purpose of a RCIP
Workshop and at 7:00 PM. for the purpose of a joint City Council/Planning Commission
Workshop.
Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\012202
14
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 11, 2001
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula City Council convened in Closed Session at 5:30 P.M., on
December 11, 2001, in the Main Conference Room of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The Open Session of the City Council
meeting commenced at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers.
ROLLCALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Naggar, Roberts, Pratt,
and Mayor Comemhero.
Absent: Councilmember: Stone.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by the Musician's Workshop Youth Choir.
On behalf of City staff, the citizens, and the Council,
Mayor Comerchero presented flowers to Ms. Eve Craig, thanking her for her continued
service in providing music for the City Council meetings.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Ron Alsobrooks of New Covenant Fellowship.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Troop No. 301.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificate of Appreciation - Cub Scout Troop No. 301
Mayor Comerchero presented Cub Scout Troop No. 301, "The Mighty Rattlesnakes,"
with a Certificate of Appreciation, noting their efforts in decorating the 196 wreaths that
adorn Old Town Temecula, devoting 172 hours towards this particular project.
Certificate of Appreciation Presentation - Ms Judi Steffen
Presenting with gratitude a Certificate of Appreciation to Ms. Judy Steffen, merchant of
the Wild Cactus in Old Town, Mayor Comerchero relayed her noteworthy efforts in
volunteering to help with the decorating of the wreaths in Old Town, as well as aiding in
other community events.
R:\Minutes\121101 !
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Harold L. Atwell, 30792 Point Woods Court, noted his concern with the unsafe
intersections in the Temeku Hills area caused by the recently widened bicycle lanes which
were widened to accommodate golf carts, noting the elimination of left-turn lanes on Bogey
Way, and Point Woods Court which created an unsafe condition; queried the rationale for
placing many residents at risk to accommodate the few who drive golf carts; and additionally
noted that the recently posted 25 MPH speed limit is not adhered to.
For clarification, Mayor Comerchero noted that the change in the streets to accommodate
golf carts was to honor an agreement made long ago; and requested Director of Public
Works Hughes to further address this issue.
In response, Director of Public Works Hughes advised that the existing five-foot bike lanes
were widened to accommodate the safe travel for golf carts, noting that these streets had
been designated as golf-cart compatible streets; relayed that the new configuration was not
unsafe in staff's opinion (although it was preferred that there be a refuge lane), but did
require motorists in the rear to wait for the stopped motorists in front of them who were
waiting for an opportunity to make a left turn; advised that this matter could go back to the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission for review, if that was the desire of the City Council; for
Mayor Comerchero, noted that there were no sight distance issues; and with respect to
staff's perspective from an engineering viewpoint, advised that this perspective was
addressed and considered when the re-striping was done.
Mr. John Carnesecca, 31555 Rancho Vista Road, representing Temecula Valley High
School Track and Field Program, requested the City Council to agendize a proposal from
the Track and Field Program, requesting the City's assistance in contributing towards
constructing a much-needed all-weather track facility.
For Mr. Carnesecca, Councilman Naggar noted the past efforts of the City Council to make
a contribution towards an all-weather track facility, relaying the concerns of the School
Board at that time; and advised that if Mr. Carnesecca would first address this issue with the
School Board, and gain its support, that he would readdress this issue with the City Council.
Mr. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, referencing the Ross v. Stone matter, noted the right
of the citizens of the United States to vote, via the U.S. Constitution; advised that to
consider not counting his vote (which had been registered at the Promenade Mall) would be
appalling; and reiterated that as an American citizen his vote should be counted.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Updating the City Council and the community regarding the Ranch Community
Church Project, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts relayed that earlier today (December
1 lth),the first Subcommittee meeting had been held, which he considered a success;
noted that the facility would be inclusive of a beautiful worship center, and a K-12th
grade school, and would require cooperative efforts, advising that he would keep the
City Council and the community apprised of the continuing discussions.
B. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts wished a Happy Holidays to all.
R:\Minutes\121101 2
C. Noting his attendance at the recent Student-of-the-Month Luncheon, Councilman
Pratt relayed what a thrill it was to honor the diligent efforts expended by these
young people.
D. With respect to the recent annual Electric Light Parade, Councilman Naggar noted
what a pleasure it was to participate, relaying Happy Holidays to all the citizens,
advising that it was an honor to serve them.
E. Reminding all to be safe during this season, Mayor Comerchero echoed the wishes
for a Happy Holiday.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2 Resolution Approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopta resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 01-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
3 City Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 2001.
4 Financial Statements for the three months ended September 30, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the three months ended
September 30, 2001.
R:\Minutes\121101 3
5 Annual Professional Services Aqreements for Geotechnical and Material Testinq
Services for various Capital Improvement Proiects for FY2001-2002
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Rescind the agreement with Petra Geotechnical, Inc. in an amount not to
exceed $60,000 to provide as-needed geotechnical and materials testing
services;
5.2
Approve an agreement with Engen Public Works Services, LLC, in an
amount not to exceed $60,000 to provide as-needed geotechnical and
material testing services;
5.3 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
6 Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Citywide Routine Maintenance Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Citywide Routine Maintenance
Contract with Walter K. Becker (dba Becker Engineering) for an amount of
$100,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment.
7
Completion and Acceptance for Starliqht Ridqe Southern Cross Road Sidewalk
Proiect - Proiect No. PW00-22
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Accept the project for the Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk
Project - Project No. PW00-22 as complete;
7.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a
one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
7.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Councilman Naggar abstained with regard to this issue.
8
Reimbursement Agreement with Rancho California Water District for Cost Sharing
for Aerial Imaqery and Diqital Topographic Elevation Data
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve a Reimbursement Agreement with Rancho California Water District
for the acquisition of Aerial Imagery and Digital Topographic Elevation Data in
the amount of $157,300.00.
R:\Minutes\121101 4
9 Contractor Prequalifications for the Community Theater (Mercantile Buildinq
Seismic Retrofit) - Proiect No. PW01-20CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit and prequalify
contractors to perform the work required for the seismic retrofit of the
Community Theater (Mercantile Building) - Project No. PW01-20CSD.
10 Second Readinq of Ordinance No. 01-16 (Amendment of the Official Zoning Map)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ALONG BOTH SIDES OF A
PORTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO, 01-0460)
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1- 10.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Robeds and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval with the exception of Councilman Naggar who abstained with regard to Item
No. 7, and Councilman Stone who was absent.
At 7:26 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District,
the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and The Temecula Public Financing Authority.
At 7:36 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business.
PUBLIC HEARING
11 Paloma del Sol Specific Plan Amendment No. 8
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:\Minutes\121101 5
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY
OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO
THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
SPECIFIC NO. 4 AND APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 01-0109 (GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT) FOR THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 8 LOCATED EAST OF
MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE
ROAD, NORTH OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND SOUTH
OF PAUBA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-
019)
11.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA 01-0102 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 8)
FOR THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN
LOCATED EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, NORTH OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE
ROAD, AND SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD BASED UPON
THE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THIS
RESOLUTION
11.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDED ZONING
STANDARDS FOR THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 8
11.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:\Minutes\121101 6
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 01-0117 -VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
24188 AMENDMENT NO. 4 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF
293 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 1 RECREATION CENTER
LOT, 1 PARK SITE LOT, AND 16 OPEN SPACE LOTS
WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN
SPACE AREAS, AND PARK SITES OF THE PALOMA
DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 8
LOCATED EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, NORTH
OF DE PORTOLA ROAD, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD, AND SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, AND
FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS.
955-030-003, 955-030-004, 955-030-006, AND 955-030-
032
Mayor Comerchero opened the public hearing, noting that the applicant has requested
that this item be continued to the January 8, 2002, City Council meeting.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Robeds moved to continue this item to the January 8, 2002,
City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who was absent.
12 Development Code Amendment (Plannin~l Application No. 01-0566 - Secondary
Dwelling Units)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCENO. 01-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY THE
STANDARDS FOR SECONDARY DWELLING UNITS
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0566)
Senior Planner Hogan provided an overview of the staff report (of record), noting that the
State legislature has made a determination that second units are an integral part of the
housing market, and that communities should require these units; clarified that the City's
current ordinance limits the size (whether it be attached or detached) to 1200 square
feet, relaying that staff had proposed that this maximum allowable size be increased to
2,000 square feet on lots of one acre, or larger; noted that when this item was presented
to the Planning Commission, ultimately it was the Commission's recommendation that
the City Council deny approval of this particular amendment; and via overheads,
R:\Minutes\121101 7
presented various sized lots, demonstrating the varying total building envelopes with the
required setbacks.
Addressing the queries of the City Council, for Councilman Naggar, City Manager
Nelson advised that while the Planning Commission recommended denial of this
amendment, it was still staff's position that this amendment would be appropriate. Senior
Planner Hogan clarifying that from staff's viewpoint, the 1200 square-foot maximum
allowable size for second units was too stringent for the larger parcels, citing an example
of a resident who owned a two-and-a-half acre lot, and desired to build a 1600 square-
foot second unit, advising that it was staff's opinion that a second unit of this size on a
two-and-a-half acre lot would be appropriate, and that the character of the area would
still be maintained; and noted that the Planning Commission's concerns were regarding
compatibility with the surrounding areas, as well as traffic, on-street parking impacts, and
the provision of additional opportunities for rental housing.
For Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, Senior Planner Hogan noted that the Planning Commission
did not hear this item until last Wednesday, ergo the information regarding the Planning
Commission's action was provided via supplemental agenda material; advised that there
were a few residents with proposals for second units which would be affected by the City
Council action, relaying that once the public hearing is opened, the sense of urgency
would be clearer; and for Councilman Pratt, reiterated that increased traffic was one of
the Planning Commission's concerns.
In response to Mayor Comerchero, Chairman Chiniaeff, representing the Planning
Commission, relayed that the concern of the Commission regarding this issue varied,
noting that initially some Commissioners opined that these second units should not be
allowed, which was addressed via the State mandate; with respect to the proposal to
permit a larger unit (larger than 1200 square feet) on lots larger than one acre, relayed
that it was the consensus of the Commission that it was not necessary to change the
ordinance to allow for larger units for the purpose of granny flats, or second units, and
that this size was adequate for this use; and reiterated the concerns regarding
increasing the size of these units, as follows: increased traffic, and the fear that the
character of the neighborhood would not be maintained.
For Mayor Comerchero, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that the State legislature
provided clarity regarding its intent, declaring that second units are a valuable form of
housing in California; that second units provide housing for family members to assist the
elderly, for in-home healthcare providers, for the disabled, and others, at below market
prices in existing neighborhoods; and advised that the unit was intended as a rental use,
and not as a unit for sale.
In response to Mayor Comerchero's queries regarding whether it was the intent of the
State to increase the economic viability of these homes, City Attorney Thorson advised
that the courts, in interpreting the statute, had stated that the units could be rented out,
advising that this would not be necessarily limited to a family member, or a caregiver;
and relayed that the unit could not be sold.
At this time Mayor Comerchero opened the public hearing.
Speaking as a proponent of the proposal to amend the Development Code, Mr. Ray
Graesser, 39700 Cantrell Road, relayed that subsequent to receiving information from
R:\Minutes\121101 8
the Building Department he built a guest house first, with plans to build a 2500-2600
square-foot main house, paid the associated school fees, and when he went to pick up
the building permit he was directed to fill out a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application,
and was subsequently told that the 1800 square-foot guest house was too large, and
should be 1200 square feet maximum; relayed that had he known, he would have built
this size unit initially; advised that in order to get permits for the main house, he has had
to wall off a portion of the guest house to reduce the square footage to 1200 square feet,
although he is paying taxes on the full unit and has spent the extra money building a
larger unit; and noted that this proposed amendment, if adopted, would have a
significant positive impact for him.
Speaking as a proponent of the proposal to amend the Development Code, Mr. Michael
Graesser, 39700 Cantrell Road, addressing the traffic concerns, relayed that his
residence is located on a privately-maintained road; noted that at this point, a lot split or
a subdivision would mean incurring substantial costs; referencing the California
Government Code, advised that the 1200 square-foot maximum size limitations were
creating a burden on his family; referenced a letter from his neighbor (which was
submitted to City Clerk Jones for the record), supporting the permitting of his 1800
square foot second unit; and noted that Riverside County limits the size of second units
to two-thirds of the square footage of the main home, and not a specific square footage.
Speaking in opposition to the proposal to amend the Development Code, Mr. Ron
Knowles, 39675 Cantrell Road, referencing the State Code, specified the State's
allowance of a maximum '1200 square-foot second unit ( *this 1200 maximum square
footage referenced was later addressed by City Attorney Thorson), advising that this
was adequate space for an elderly parent, relaying that to allow a 2,000 square-foot unit
on a five-acre lot, changed the character of the neighborhood; and additionally noted his
concern regarding traffic, and changes in density.
Speaking in opposition to the proposal to amend the Development Code, Mr. Bill De
Valch, 39835 Cantrell Road, relayed that he bought his property in order to live in a Iow-
density area; and advised that to allow a 2,000 square foot second unit would create
traffic impacts, as well as negative impacts after the property was sold.
For clarification regarding a comment made by the public, City Attorney Thorson advised
that the State only limits the size of the second unit if a local jurisdiction has not adopted
an ordinance addressing second units; for Mayor Comerchero, confirmed that the City of
Temecula did adopt an ordinance limiting the size to a maximum 1200 square feet, and
that the Council did have the authority to allow a larger-sized second unit, is so desired.
At this time the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts noted that he could not support a blanket approval allowing
2,000 square foot second units on lots one acre, or larger, advising that a second unit
this size would be inappropriate on various parcels.
in response to Councilman Naggar, Director of Planning Ubnoske confirmed that the
setback requirements would still have to be adhered to, confirming that the building
envelopes on parcels would vary, Senior Planner Hogan confirming that the site
topography could further restrain the building on the property.
R:\Minutes\121101 9
With respect to traffic, Councilman Naggar relayed that if an individual opted to add
square footage via an attached building (i.e., an add-on), the impacts would not be
different then those associated with adding a second unit; and queried the City Council
for clarification regarding the concerns.
In response, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts relayed that a larger, detached second unit could
house a second family, or be utilized as rental housing, more easily.
For Councilman Naggar, City Attorney Thorson advised that the law did not place
limitations regarding who could utilize the second unit; and for Mayor Comerchero,
confirmed that the City Council could not restrict the use.
Noting his inclination to support increasing the allowable size of a second unit,
Councilman Naggar opined that a 2,000 square foot unit would be too large for a one-
acre site; and advised that since there appeared to be a consensus (in the community,
as well as on the City Council) that the concept of granny fiats would not create a
negative impact, it was his recommendation that the negative aspects of this proposal be
mitigated.
Mayor Comerchero opined that it was inappropriate to amend the Development Code to
address one resident's issue, advising that a more prudent avenue for solving this matter
be sought.
For informational purposes, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that there was a second
property owner present at this hearing who has had to wall off a portion of their second
unit due to this size issue.
For clarification, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that when coming into the Planning
Department, residents with large parcels have relayed a desire for larger second units,
clarifying the rationale for staff bringing this issue forward.
For Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, Senior Planner Hogan provided the rationale for staff
proposing to amend the maximum size of a second unit on lots of a size of one acre, or
larger.
In response to City Manager Nelson, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that in the
past eleven years, staff has had fewer than five requests for larger second units,
confirming that this issue would most likely not have a significant impact in the City,
overall.
Additional discussion ensued regarding the following: 1) creating a sliding scale and
permitting varying sized units based on the acreage of the parcel, 2) addressing the
requests on a case-by-case basis, or 3) increasing the maximum size to 1600 square
feet.
In response to Councilman Pratt's suggestion, City Attorney Thorson relayed that the
City Council would have the authority to approve the uses via a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP), but that standards would have to be developed; and noted that the fee for a CUP
was approximately $5,000.
R:\Minutes\121101 10
In response to Councilman Naggar's queries regarding expeditiously addressing the
residents who have existing second units larger than 1200 square feet, which have been
walled off, Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that the sole avenue for dealing with
these issues with the existing ordinance, would be to limit the second unit to 1200
square feet.
Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that if the units were to be permitted via a Minor
CUP, the matter would go before a hearing, neighbors would be noticed, staff could
address incompatibility issues, and the cost would be under $1,000; and for Councilman
Naggar, advised that findings (i.e., compatibility) would have to be developed to support
the CUP.
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts noted that he would not support permitting a 2,000 square foot
second unit unless the lots' size was a minimum of 2.5, or 5 acres.
Discussion ensued regarding consideration to send the item back to the Planning
Commission for consideration, Chairman Chiniaeff concurring that new information had
been presented.
For Councilman Naggar, Chairman Chiniaeff noted that the second units could be
allowable solely in certain sections of the City, if the larger second units were permitted
based on a certain lot size.
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Roberts, City Attorney Thorson advised that the CC&Rs
of a Homeowners Association are an independent authority over land uses than City
zoning regulations, advising that one does not affect the other.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to send this item back to the Planning
Commission for consideration. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts seconded the motion and voice
vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who was
absent.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Providing an update, City Manager Nelson relayed that Congress has approved
a $4 million commitment of Federal transportation funds to widen Pala Road,
thanking Congressman Issa, Senators Boxer, and Feinstein, staff, as well as
Federal Lobbyist David Turch, for their efforts regarding this matter; and noted
that there was an additional $4.4 million pledged by the Pechangas for this
project.
With respect to the refinancing of the Community Recreation Project Bonds, City
Manager Nelson relayed that the final pricing was complete, and that the City
would receive approximately $2.67 million in additional funding without increasing
the City's annual debt service costs, advising that the funds would be considered
by the City Council in the upcoming CIP process.
After City Manager Nelson welcomed his daughter's attendance to the meeting
(validating for her teacher's information that she was present at this City Council
meeting), Mayor Comerchero requested that she stand, and all those present
greeted Jennifer Nelson with applause.
R:\Minutes\121101 11
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
With respect to the five items discussed in Closed Session, City Attorney
Thorson advised that there were no reportable actions regarding the three Real
Estate items, noting that no final action will be taken on these matters unless at a
public meeting; relayed that there was nothing to report with respect to the City of
Temecula v. Lennar Homes litigation; and with respect to the Ross v. Stone
matter, relayed that a motion was made by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts, seconded
by Mayor Comerchero to defend Mr. Stone pursuant to Government Code
Section 36812.5; that the vote was tied with Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and Mayor
Comerchero voting yes, and Councilmen Naggar and Pratt voting no, advising
that the action was to not defend Mr. Stone in the election contest.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:29 P.M., Mayor Comerchero formally adjourned the City Council meeting to
Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\121101
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 17, 200'1
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:00 P.M., on
December 17, 2001, in the Main Conference Room of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The Open Session of the City Council
meeting commenced at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers.
ROLLCALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Naggar, Roberts, Pratt, Stone,
and Mayor Comerchero.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Naggar.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Commenting on the recently distributed 2002 Recycling and Litter Reduction Calendar,
which was made-up of elementary-aged children's artwork, Councilman Pratt relayed
that the drawings by the young people were superb.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Appointment of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Entertain motions from the City Coundlmembers to appoint the Mayor to
preside until the end of calendar year 2002.
1.2
Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to appoint the Mayor Pro-
Tem, who will assume the duties of the Mayor in the Mayor's absence and
hold this office until the end of calendar year 2002.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to appoint Councilman Roberts as Mayor for the
calendar year 2002. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
R:\Minutes\121701
MOTION: Councilman Roberts moved to appoint Councilman Stone as Mayor Pro Tem
for the calendar year 2002. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and
voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Naggar who voted no
and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Nelson wished all a Happy Holiday Season.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
With respect to the existing litigation of the Ross v. Stone matter, City Attorney Thorson
noted that by a vote of three-to-two the City Council authorized the defense of Mr. Stone
in the election contest entitled Ross v. Stone, Riverside County Superior Court, Case
No. RIC 367738; advised that no votes were expressed by Councilmen Naggar and
Pratt; relayed that the City Council authorized the defense under Government Code
Section 36812.5 subject to reservation of rights, which essentially includes the following:
1) that the City will monitor the litigation to determine whether or not the grounds
provided for defense under Government Code Section 36812.5 have continued to exist
and whether there are grounds for withdrawal of the defense, 2) that in the event that the
City withdraws the defense in indemnification the City will proceed to collect from Mr.
Stone the attorney's fees and litigation expenses through the date of withdrawal, 3) that
the City shall select at its sole discretion competent counsel to defend Mr. Stone in the
election contest, shall control the litigation budget for the defense, 4) that Mr. Stone has
a right to obtain counsel of his own choosing to participate in the defense with counsel
chosen by the City, however the City shall not be responsible for payment of the
additional attorney, and 5) in consenting to the terms, Councilman Stone recognizes that
the terms of the defense are setforth in the letter, as so the opportunity to consult with
counsel, and there are no other terms or conditions for the defense; and advised that Mr.
Stone has accepted those terms and the City will proceed with the defense.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:09 P.M., Mayor Comerchero formally adjourned the City Council meeting to
Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\121701 2
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $2,482,498.13.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of January, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL.]
R:/Resos2002/Resos 02- 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 02- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temeoula on the 22nd day of January, 2002 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
RYResos2OO2/Resos 02- 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
01/04/02 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/10/02 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/22/02 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/03/02 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01/22/02 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTSBYFUND;
CHECKS:
001
165
190
192
193
194
210
261
280
300
320
330
340
GENERAL FUND
RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY- CIP
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
$ 419,407.34
10,877.58
144,729.19
47.04
9,272.82
1,516,163.39
58,064.32
1,800.97
14,699.61
6,008.01
33,411.91
11,017.26
18,083.75
$ 262,176.65
181,278.19
1,800,126.35
238,914.94
$ 2,482,498.13
2,243,583.19
001
165
190
192
193
194
28O
300
3';'0
330
340
GENERAL FUND
RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY RETA WESTON, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST
SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER
175,099.87
4,160.27
40,425.20
65.35
3,672.42
536.58
2,079.82
853.28
6,395.43
1,650.87
3,975.8~
238,914.94
$ 2,482,498.13
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 14
01/04/02 09:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
172,191.98
8,095.57
33,460.49
46.22
5,990.50
641.18
10,931.56
1,408.73
741.27
13,793.05
2,195.27
12,680.83
TOTAL 262,176.65
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
01/04/02 09:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
10302 01/04/02 000642
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020
TEMECULA CiTY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020
TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERB
4467D 01/03/02 000246 PERB
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERB
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERB
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44670 01/03/02 000246 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERB
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
44760 01/03/02 000245 PERS
ITEM
AMOUNT
3,324.46
112.50
555.00
3.75
1.25
11.25
37.50
466.66
327.75
18.75
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 28,471.45
EMPLOYEES, RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 669.01
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 5,109.02
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 12.06
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERB RET 193-2390 484.71
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 101.06
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 289.21
EMPLOYEES, RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 139.55
EMPLOYEES, RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2130 26.51
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 1,153.53
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PEBS RET 330-2390 220.15
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 596.87
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 182.91
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 103.10
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.87
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 20.46
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .05
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 2.29
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .36
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .92
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 3.72
EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 1.39
EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.65
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 001-2090 58.61
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 165-2090 123.68
HEALTH INBUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 190-2090 119.00
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 280-2090 41.22
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 340-2090 8.14
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 19.52
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 54.51
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 147.66
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 31.23
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 .37
HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 001-2090 23.43
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 001-2090 119.46
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 93.56
HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 840.39-
~EALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 1,621.72
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,858.87
37,593.31
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
01/04/02 09:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOURT
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
44760 01/03/02 000245
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH 1NSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INBUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS NEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS NEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTN INSUR. PRE
PERB HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS NEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH IRSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH IHSUR. PRE
PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE
000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI
000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 1,359.45
000245 BLSHIELD 340-2090 257.51
000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 5,763.22
000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 1,515.50
000245 HELTHNET 193-2090 63.56
000245 HELTHNET 194-2090 31.78
000245 RELTHNET 340-2090 687.98
000245 KAISER 001-2090 2,717.14
000245 PACCARE 001-2090 8,154.49
000245 PACCARE 165-2090 320.65
000245 PACCARE 190-2090 410.96
000245 PACCARE 280-2090 106.89
000245 PC 001-2090 16.00
000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 4,651.02
000245 PERS CHO 190-2090 573.33
000245 PERS CNO 280-2090 14.21
000245 PERS DED 001-2090 1,462.15
000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 1,484.51
000245 UNI 001-2090 4,367.02
000245 UNI 190-2090 775.61
000245 UNI 193-2090 168.61
000245 UNI 330-2090 84.30
A~ARD PROGRAM APPLICATION FEE
001-140-999-5250 480.00
74158 12/24/01
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 26,936.02
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX CIRB) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 520.90
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 6~043.56
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 19.22
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 556.16
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 138.06
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 204.08
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 91.02
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 1,171.35
789068 01/03/02 000283 INBTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 220.88
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 546.71
789068 01/03/02 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 6,700.63
789068 01/03/02 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 159.46
789068 01/~3/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,498.16
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 2.80
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 133.48
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 22.86
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 71.73
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 32.48
789068 01/03/02 000283 INETATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 274.26
789068 01/03/02 000283 INETATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 56.73
789068 01/03/02 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 143.63
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 110.97
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070 3.34
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 BDI 190-2070 92.62
36,607.61
480.00
45,544.18
VOUCHRE2
01/04/02 09:26
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 4.64
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 .63
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 1.62
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340'2070 3.07
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 6,855.40
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165'2070 128.96
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 1~368.28
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 6.02
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193'2070 115.67
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194'2070 42.08
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 44.77
789180 01/03/02 000444 IHSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 20.09
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 253.66
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 50.07
789180 01/03/02 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340'2070 114.02
OFFICE SIGNS FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250
74161 01/04/02 000303 2/90 SIGN SYSTEMS
861.30
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 001'2330 330.10
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 190-2330 14.34
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 193-2330 14.34
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 194'2330 4.78
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 340-2330 14.34
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 001'2330 156.20
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 190-2330 55.80
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 320-2330 27.90
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 HOSP IC 001'2330 17.50
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 001'2330 608.00
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 190-2330 177.60
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 193-2330 9.60
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 194'2330 3.20
74162 01/04/02 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 340~2330 20.80
XXX'1408 POLICE DEPT - DEC 001-170-999-5229
CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:POLICE DPT 001'170-999'5208
74163 01/04/02 004148 A T & T
74164 01/04/02 000745 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC
45.30
455.52
CHECK
AMOUNT
9,215.91
861.30
1,454.50
45.30
455.52
74165 01/04/02 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 707.15
74165 01/04/02 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 17.60
74165 01/04/02 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190"2310 95.17
74165 01/04/02 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310 11.73
74165 01/04/02 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 194-2310 1.68
74165 01/04/02 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 5.86
74165 01/04/02 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 330-2310 5.58
74165 01/04/02 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 42.23
74166 01/04/02 002038 ACTION POOL & SPA SUPPL
POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS
190-186-999-5212
25.91
887.00
25.91
74167 01/04/02 004054 ADKISON ENGINEERS INC SURVEY SVC:FIRE STN 92 PW01-21 210-165-739-5802
74168 01/04/02 003693 AMERICAN ASSN OF MUSEUM BOOK:MUSEUM REG METHODS 190-185-999-5228
495.00
46.00
495.00
46.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
01/04/02 09:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
74169 01/04/02
74170 01/04/02
74171 01/04/02
74171 01/04/02
74171 01/04/02
74171 01/04/02
74171 01/04/02
74172 01/04/02
74172 01/04/02
74172 01/04/02
74172 01/04/02
74172 01/04/02
74173 01/04/02
74174 01/04/02
74175 01/04/02
74175 01/04/02
74175 01/04/02
74176 01/04/02
74177 01/04/02
74178 01/04/02
74179 01/04/02
74179 01/04/02
74180 01/04/02
74181 01/04/02
74182 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
74183 01/04/02
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER NAME DESCR I PT I ON
004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE,
004787 AMERIMARK DIRECT
000101 APPLE ORE, IRC.
000101 APPLE ONE, IBC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
001561 ARCH
001561 ARCH
001561 ARCH
001561 ARCH
001561 ARCH
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
004757 AUTO MALL COLLISION CEN
004798 AVANU
004798 AVANU
004798 AVANU
002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV
BECKINGHAM~ JOELLE
8OTTO, MARIA ESTELA
CACE
CACE
CA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL
001155 EALIF PUBLIC SECTOR
004604 CALPELRA
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
AEEOUNT
NUMBER
JAR STORAGE UNIT Blll RENTAL 320-199-999-5238
CITY RECYCLE PRGM:PENCILS 194-180-999-5265
TEMP HELP W/E 12/08 SENG/SMITH 001-162-999-5118
TEMP HELP W/E 12/08 SENG/SMITH 001-162-999-5118
TEMP HELP W/E 12/15 SENG 001-162-999-5118
TEMP HELP W/E 12/15 8ECERRA 001-110-999-5118
TEMP HELP W/E 12/15 SECERRA 001-150-999-5118
DEC-MAR PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 001-164-601-5238
DEC-MAR PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 001-110-999-5238
DEC-MAR PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 001-150-999-5250
DEC-MAR PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 001-170-999-5238
DEC-MAR PAGING/RENTAL SVCS 190-180-999-5238
MEMBERSHIP DUE: FRANK CARRANZA 330-199-999-5250
REPAIRS TO MEDIC SQUAD VEHICLE 001-171-999-5214
REMOTE ACCESS SERVER RASO030 320-1970
FREIGHT 320-1970
BALES TAX 320-1970
REISSUE CK:R&R SIDEWALKS CTYWD 001-164-601-5402
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982
MEMBERSHIP: TOM COLE 001-161-999-5226
MEMBERHSHIP: MARIANNE SALAEAR 001-161-999-5226
REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-2865 190-2900
EAL PUBLIC SECTOR DIRECTORY 001-120-999-5228
MEMBEHSHIP: GRANT M. YATES 001-150-999-5226
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
ITEM
AMOUNT
124.00
215.00
495.70
88.65
520.00
22.75
22.75
84.45
40.65
40.65
153.90
481.50
44.00
494.22
4,458.40
21.00
334.38
4,865.00
8.75
17.50
40.00
40.00
100.00
461.95
195.00
823.43
15.50
170.53
.39
19.00
3.09
7.75
3.88
31.00
11.62
22.06
EHECK
AMOUNT
124.00
215.00
1,149.85
001,15
44.00
494.22
4,813.78
4,865.00
8.75
17.50
80.00
100.00
461.95
195.00
1,108.25
VOUCHRE2
01/04/02 09:26
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
HUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
74184 01/04/02 COLOPY, DONNA M.
74185 01/04/02 004544 COMMAND POST, THE TRIAGE TARP SET FOR MEDICS US
74186 01/04/02 COMMITTEE TO ELECT REFUND:EXCESS CANDIDATES FEES
74187 01/04/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
74187 01/04/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
74187 01/04/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH ERARIT 004403 CHC
74187 01/04/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
74187 01/04/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH EHARIT 004405 CHC
74187 01/04/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
74187 01/04/02 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
74188 01/04/02 001193 COMP U S A INC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
74188 01/04/02 001193 COMP U S A INC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
74188 01/04/02 001193 COMP U S A INC MlSC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
74189 01/04/02 002147 COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS SANTA SUIT RENTAL:12/16-19/01
74189 01/04/02 002147 COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS SALES TAX
74190 01/04/02 000447 COMTROMIX OF HEMET
74190 01/04/02 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET
74190 01/04/02 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET
74190 01/04/02 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET
74190 01/04/02 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET
74191 01/04/02 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS SEPT GEOTECH SVC:PAVEMENT MGMT
74192 01/04/02 CROWTHER, ROBERT
74193 01/04/02 CSTI-CALIF SPECIALIZED
74194 01/04/02 003561 D F M ASSOCIATES
74195 01/04/02 001233 DANS FEED & SEED IHC
74196 01/04/02 001393 DATA TICKET
74197 01/04/02 003383 DEAMER APPLIANCE SERVIC REPAIR TO STATION 84 HEATER
74198 01/04/02 004450 DENNIS A HIBBERT PLUMB[ REPAIR COUNTER TOPS CRACKS:CRC
74199 01/04/02 DOOLv EDWARD REFUND:EXCESS CANDIDATES FEES
74200 01/04/02 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
74201 01/04/02 001380 E S ! EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP RELP N/E 12/14 RUSH
74201 01/04/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 EBON
74201 01/04/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 MONTECINO
74201 01/04/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP N/E 12/14 MONTECINO
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
RADIO INSTALLATION:FIRE STN 92
SALES TAX
INSTALL RADIO:POLICE CYCLE
LABOR FOR INSTALLATION
SALES TAX
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
EMERG SVCS COMF:YATES:02/14/02
3:CAL ELECTIONS CODE BOOKS
PROPANE GAS FOR PUBLIC WORKS
NOV PRKG CITATION PROCESS SVCS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-4982
001-171-999-5311
001-2675
001-2120
190-2120
192-2120
193-2120
194-2120
330-2120
340-2120
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5242
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
210-165~739-5804
210-165-7'39-5804
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
210-165-655-5804
190-183-4982
001-110-999-5261
001-120-999-5228
001-164-601-5218
001-170-999-5250
001-171-999-5212
190-182-999-5416
001-2675
001-164-601-5263
001-161-999-5118
340-199-701-5118
340-199-701-5118
340-199-702-5118
ITEM
AMOUNT
8.75
444.15
57.00
89.49
42.90
1.21
1.94
7.51
.90
171.99
466.38
101.08
170.00
12.75
2,291
96.83
870.70
1,560. O0
65.30
2,762.50
8.75
200.00
129.30
20.00
425.56
86. O0
571.00
61.00
469.46
2,169.19
1, ?94.40
751.80
250.60
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
8.75
444.15
57.00
144.00
739.45
182.75
4,883.83
2,762.50
8.75
200.00
129,30
20.00
425.56
86.00
571.00
61.00
469.46
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6
01/04/02 09:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
74201 01/04/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74201 01/04/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74201 01/04/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74202 01/04/02 003665 EMERITUS COMMUNICATIONS
74203 01/04/02 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN
TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 OBMANN
TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 HEER
TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 MCCOY
001-171-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
NOV LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS 320-199-999-5208
REFRESHMENTS:CLOSED SESSION MT 001-100-999-5260
1,482.78
2,407.79
2,607.20
1,415.02
230.05
10,863.76
1,415.02
230.05
74204 01/04/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-111-999-5230
74204 01/04/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIl SERVICES 001-164-604-5230
6.78
15.75
22.53
74205 01/04/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-1405 UBNOSKE:SUPPLIES;COHF 001-161-999-5220
74205 01/04/02 003347 FIRST SANKCARD CENTER XX-1405 UBHOSKE:EUPPLIEB;COHF 001-161-999-5258
74205 01/04/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-1405 UBHOSKE:SUPPLIES;CONF 001-161-999-5260
74205 01/04/02 003347 FIRST SANKCARD CENTER XX-1405 UBHOSKE:SUPPLIES;CONF 001-1990
74206 01/04/02 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC
AUDIO/VIDEO SUPPLIES:C.CHAMBER 320-199-999-5221
128.74
333.00
149.76
8.04
173.70
619.54
173.70
74207 01/04/02 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD - W 002982 ST DED 001-2140 103.94
103.94
74208 01/04/02 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
74208 01/04/02 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
74208 01/04/02 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
74208 01/04/02 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
DAY TIMER SUPPLIES - COUNCIL
SHIPPING AND HANDLING
SALES TAX
DAY TIMER SUPPLIES - B&S
001-100-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
25.20
5.06
2.26
108.24
140.76
74209 01/04/02 002528 GLASS BLASTERS IHC CITY MUGS FOR NEW HIRES 001-150-999-5265
74209 01/04/02 002528 GLASS BLASTERS IRC CITY MUGS FOR POLICE DEPT 001-1170
34.40
48.38
82.78
74210 01/04/02 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI MEMBERSHIP:G.ROBERTS/P.SROWN 001-140-999-5226
485.00
485.00
74211 01/04/02 004053 HABITAT WEST IRC
OCT/NOV/DEC SVCS:PALA BRDG PJT 210-165-631-5804
1,174.98
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL REVER 001'2510 250.15'
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 222.65
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190'2510 15.37
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193'2510 5.72
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 300-2510 .80
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340'2510 4.87
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL ADVAN 001'2510 250.15
74212 01/04/02 002107 RIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001'2510 222.66
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190'2510 15.38
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193'2510 5.7-5
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194'2510 .75
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 300'2510 .79
74212 01/04/02 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340'2510 4.84
1,174.98
500.30
74213 01/04/02 HOERR, JODY
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982
8.75
8.75
74214 01/04/02 HONG, KYUNG OK REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982 8.75 8.75
VOUCHRE2
01/04/02 09:26
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
74215 01/04/02
74215 01/04/02
74215 01/04/02
74215 01/04/02
74215 01/04/02
74215 01/04/02
74216 01/04/02
74217 01/04/02
74218 01/04/02
74219 01/04/02
74219 01/04/02
74220 01/04/02
74221 01/04/02
74222 01/04/02
74223 01/04/02
74224 01/04/02
74225 01/04/02
74226 01/04/02
74227 01/04/02
74227 01/04/02
74228 01/04/02
74229 01/04/02
74229 01/04/02
74230 01/04/02
74230 01/04/02
74230 01/04/02
74230 01/04/02
74231 01/04/02
74232 01/04/02
74232 01/04/02
74232 01/04/02
74232 01/04/02
74232 01/04/02
74232 01/04/02
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCBER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUB 000194 DEF COMP
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
IMANI TEMPLE OF TEMECUL REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01'2059
004795 J B E S
JEWELL, FREDRIC S.
003280 JON LASKIN BAND
003280 JON LASKIN BAND
JONES, AMY
JORDAN, SHANNON
JUSTUS, JEANETTE
KAPPLE, MARY
KIM, SUNG MI
000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC
LAVIN~ DINA
001865 M C !
001865 M C I
003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS
004141 MAINTEX INC
004141 MAINTEX INC
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076
PALA PARK MODIFY WATCHKEEPER
REFUND:DEVEL DEPT LDO1-O43GR
ENTERTAINMENT:DICKENS OLD TWN
ENTERTAINMENT:DICKENS OLD TWN
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-3238
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
MNTC SUPPLIES FOR PW WORK CREW
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
DEC XXX-1588 CRC
DEC XXX-1708 SKATE PARK
HARDWARE SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT
CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CREDIT:ITEM RETURNED
TEMP HELP W/E 12/09 MCCLANAHAN
TEMP HELP W/E 12/16 CM/AM
TEMP HElP W/E 12/16 COX
TEMP HELP W/E 12/16 NOVOTNY
12/12-19/01 CONSULT SVCS:PLN
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
DENTALML
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
190-2900
190-180-999-5212
001-2670
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999~5362
190-183-4982
190-2900
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
001-164-601-5218
190-183-4982
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-164-601-5244
340-199-701-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-171-999-5118
001-161-999-5248
001-2340
165-2340
190-2340
193-2340
194-2340
280-2340
ITEM
AMOUNT
4,602.75
523.99
581.66
16.50
194.52
50.00
100.00
360.00
995. O0
100.00
100.00
8.75
100,00
8.75
8.75
8.75
46.96
8.75
2.50
2.50
258.00
472.84
91.24-
412.80
557.93
45.15
45.15
1,054.90
4,~5.35
208.96
819.55
63.56
5.66
104.48
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
5,969.42
100.00
360.00
995.00
200.00
8.75
100.00
8.75
8.75
8.75
46.96
8.75
5.00
258.00
381.60
1,061.03
1,054.90
VOUCHRE2
01/04/02 09:26
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DEHTALML
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
MIRACLE RECREATION EQU1
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
BUSINESS CARDS:B.CLEMENTS
CORRECTION NOTICES FOR B&S
VARIOUS PARKS PLAY EQUIPMENT
985-521 LARGE SWING CLEVIS.
BUCKET OF SWING CNAIN 250'.
FREIGNT
SALES TAX
WASH ST/SAND BAG:J.W./CABRILLO
MUNICIPAL MGMT ASSOCIAT RENEW ANNUAL MEMBERSNIP:G.YATE
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI ANNUAL MBRSHP:COUNCIL/CTY MGR
NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO REPAIR OF AIR COMPRESSOR
NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO REPAIR OF AIR COMPRESSOR
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR GI8
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOB PLANNING
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE
PRINTER REPLACEMENT:PD TRAFFIC
SALES TAX
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
REC SUPPLIES - NIGH HOPES PRGM
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-2124
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
SUPPLIES FON EMP RECOGNITION
REFUND:CANDIDATE STATEMENT FEE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
74232 01/04/02 003076
74232 01/04/02 003076
74233 01/04/02 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
74233 01/04/02 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
74234 01/04/02 000973
74234 01/04/02 000973
74234 01/04/02 00097'J
74234 01/04/02 000973
74234 01/04/02 000973
74235 01/04/02 000883
74236 01/04/02 002727
74237 01/04/02 000845
74238 01/04/02 002898
74238 01/04/02 002898
74239 01/04/02 O'NARA, SUSANNE
74240 01/04/02 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
74240 01/04/02 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
74240 01/04/02 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
74240 01/04/02 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
74240 01/04/02 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
74240 01/04/02 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
74240 01/04/02 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
74241 01/04/02 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
74241 01/04/02 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
74242 01/04/02 OLVERA, VIRGINIA MARTIN
74243 01/04/02 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN
74244 01/04/02 OROZCO, SEVERA
74245 01/04/02 ORTNER~ SYLVIA
74246 01/04/02 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA
74247 01/04/02 PEDERSEN, CHRIS CBA
74248 01/04/02 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PENS L-T
74249 01/04/02 000249 PETTY CASN
74249 01/04/02 000249 PETTY CASH
74249 01/04/02 000249 PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
330-2340
340'2340
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
190'180'999-5212
190'180-999'5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-164'601'5402
001'110'999-5226
001-100-999-5226
001-164-601-5214
001-164'601'5214
190"183-4982
001-161-610-5220
001'161-999-5220
001-170'999'5220
001'140'999'5220
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5220
001-110'999-5214
001'164-601'5214
190'183'4982
190-183-999-53~
190-2900
190'183'4982
001-150-999"5265
001'2675
001-2122
001-140-999-5262
001-150-999-5265
001-150-999-5265
ITEM
AMOONT
18.87
135.82
42.7~
361.79
4.92
390.00
160.20
8.20
29.55
1,500.00
50.00
3,530.00
322.85
783.62
8.75
10.34
133.67
27.51
57.18
399.99
30.00
39.95
133.45
8.75
185.65
100.00
8.75
226.90
53.00
83.99
22.08
50.00
50.00
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
6,092.25
404.52
592.87
1,500.00
50.00
3,530.00
1,106.47
8.75
695.46
1~.40
8.75
185.65
100.00
8.75
226.90
53.00
83.99
VOUCBRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9
01/04/02 09:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CBECK
NUMBER DATE
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74249 01/04/02
74250 01/04/02
74251 01/04/02
74252 01/04/02
74253 01/04/02
74253 01/04/02
74254 01/04/02
74255 01/04/02
74255 01/04/02
74255 01/04/02
74255 01/04/02
74256 01/04/02
74256 01/04/02
74257 01/04/02
74258 01/04/02
74259 01/04/02
74260 01/04/02
74261 01/04/02
74262 01/04/02
74262 01/04/02
74263 01/04/02
74264 01/04/02
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000249 PETTY CABN
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASB
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY GASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
PLATZER, WALTER
PROVENCIO, BARBARA
004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC
004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC
RAISCN, JENNIFER
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
004584 REGENCY LIGHTING
004584 REGENCY LIGHTING
000266 RIGHTWAY
000268 RIVERSIDE CO NABITAT
ROBERTS, RONALD H.
ROSS, CARL
002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE
001942 S C SIGNS
001942 S C SIGNS
003389 SAN DIEGO CONVENTION
000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CAGH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5220
001-164-601-5260
001-165-999-5220
001-171-999-5260
001-2175
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-537~
190-187-999-5301
320-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
340-199-701-5214
190-183-4982
REFUND:BEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-2165 190-2900
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
SEP DSGN SVCS:N.W.SPORTS CMPLX
OCT DSGN SVCS:TEM AQUATIC FAC
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
DEC 01-99-02003-0 FLOATING MTR
DEC 02-79'10100-1NW SPORTS PK
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
CITY NALL FRONT PLANTERS
SALES TAX
JAN EQUIP RENTAL-LONG CYN CRK
190-183-4982
210-190-173-5802
210-190-170-5802
190-183-4982
001-164-601-5250
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-180-999-5238
DEC 2001 K-RAT PAYMENT 001-2300
REFUND:CANDIDATE STATEMENT FEE 001-2675
REFUND:CANDIDATE STATEMENT FEE 001-2675
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
INSTALL PUBLIC NTC SIGNS:C.C.
INSTALL PUBLIC NTC SIGNS:PLN
LA TIMES BOOTH SHARE:02/16-17
RECRUITMENT AD:ENGINEERING
190-183-999-5330
001-120-999-5244
001-161-999-5256
001-111-999-5270
001-150-999-5254
ITEM
AMOUNT
16.28
9.65
30.00
9.34
20.29
2.18
10.21
4.95
5.15
108.81
15.01
36.67
14.22
31.00
8.75
100.00
8.~
1,266.75
2,368.40
256.45
68.51
755.71
1,745.22
143.20
10.74
54.3B
140.00
55.00
52.00
574.00
130.00
650.00
850.00
392.04
CHECK
AMOUNT
435.84
8.75
100.00
8.75
3,635.15
8.75
2,825.89
153.94
54.38
140.00
55.00
52.00
574.00
780.00
850.00
392.04
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10
01/04/02 09:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMSER
74265
74266
74267
74268
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74269
74270
74270
74271
74272
74273
74274
74275
74275
74275
74275
74275
74275
74275
CHEEK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
01/04/02
003492 SCHOLASTIC SPORTS
SELFRIDGE, SIU Y1NG
000645 SMART & FINAL INC
SMITH, CHRISTA
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF. EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
D00537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
STONE, JEFFREY E.
000574 SUPERTONER
SWINGLE~ LORI
T.V. POP WARNER, INC.
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
~01WNTR SPRT PRGM/MEDIA GUIDE
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
SISTER CITIES SUPPLIES
REFUND:EXERCISE-YOGA FOR TODAY
DEC 2-21-518-0340 HWY 79
DEC 2-11-007-0455 6TN ST
DEC 2-22-891-0550 VARIOUS MTRS
DEC 2-22-891-0550 VARIOUS MTRS
DEC 2-22-575-0876 VARIOUS MTRS
DEC 2-10-747-1393 VARIOUS MTRS
DEC 2-14-204-1615 FRNT ST RDIO
DEC 2-20-792-2444 VARIOUS MTRS
DEC 2-18-937-3152 MUSEUM
DEC 2-22-496-3439 VARIOUS MTRS
DEC 2-21-981-4720 RWY 79
DEC 2-02-351-4946 SR CTR
DEC 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL
DEC 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS
DEC 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS
DEC 2-21-560-5874 MARGARITA
DEC 2-23-365-5992 STN 92
DEC 2-18-049-6416 FRONT ST PED
DEC 2-21-911-7892 S.SIDE PK LT
DEC 2-19-171-8568 WED CHAPEL
DEC 2-22-934-9634 DIAZ RD
DEC 2-22-934-9766 DIAZ
DEC 2-20-817-9929 P.D.FRNT ST
DEC 2-18-528-9980 SANTIAGO RD
CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SVCS
TCC PEST CONTROL SVCS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-100-999-5254
190-183-4982
001-101-999-5280
190-183-4982
190-180-999-5319
001-164-603-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
340-199-701-5240
190-180-999-5319
190-185-999-5240
190-180-999-5319
001-165-999-5250
190-181-999-5240
340-199-701-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5319
001-171-999-5240
001-164-603-5319
001-164-603-5240
190-185-999-5240
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5319
001-170-999-5229
190-180-999-5319
340-199-701-5250
190-184-999-5250
REFUND:CANDIDATE STATEMENT FEE 001-2675
HP PRINTER SUPPLIES
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG
320-199-999-5221
190-183-4982
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-3228 190-2900
REC SUPPLIES - SPECIAL EVENTS
REC SUPPLIES - SPECIAL EVENTS
TEEN RECREATION SUPPLIES
REC SUPPLIES - SPECIAL EVENTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5320
190-183-999-5370
001-163-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-164-604-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
150.00
8.75
43.85
48.00
60.47
351.58
90.23
1,602.41
324.14
29.41
13.82
195.64
495.98
154.90
73.85
598.87
5,674.95
27.64
717.83
76.43
217.17
209.72
156.23
61.59
70.07
65.40
248.95
47.45
56.00
36.00
63.00
986.27
8.75
100.00
35.67
29.19
96.62
19.35
110.87
79.19
95.03
CHECK
AMOUNT
150.00
8.75
43.85
48.00
11,564.73
92.00
63. O0
986.27
8.75
100.00
VOUCHER2
01/04/02 09:26
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
74275 01/04/02 000305 TARGET STORE BEC SUPPLIES - SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370
74275 01/04/02 000305 TARGET STORE BEC SUPPLIES-SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370
74275 01/04/02 000305 TARGET STORE REC SUPPLIES FOR MPSC 190-181-999-5301
74275 01/04/02 000305 TARGET STORE BEC SUPPLIES - SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370
21.46
20.60
157.63
19.35
684.96
74276 01/04/02 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001~2125 849.38
74276 01/04/02 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 169.88
74276 01/04/02 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 18.00
74276 01/04/02 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.25
74276 01/04/02 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 67.50
74276 01/04/02 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 33.74
74276 01/04/02 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 51.75
74277 01/04/02 TEATOR, CARA REFUND:ARTS/CRAFT-CREATIVE ART 190-182-4980
8.00
1,192.50
8.00
74278 01/04/02 004788 TEMECULA ROOFING RES IMPRV PRGM: LEDFORD 165-199-813-5804
74278 01/04/02 004788 TEMECULA ROOFING CREDIT:AMOUNT EXCEEDS CONTRACT 165-199-813-5804
74279 01/04/02 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY HOLIDAY PARADE AWARD:ST.JEANNE 190-183-999-5370
4,958.00
95.00-
57.51
4,863.00
57.51
74280 01/04/02 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT MNTC FAC DOORS KEYED/MSTR SYS 210-190-158-5804
74280 01/04/02 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT REKEY LOCKS @ MAINT BLDG 340-199-702-5219
74280 01/04/02 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT LOCKSMITN SVCS:BTRFLD STAGE PK 190-180-999-5212
476.10
275.00
76.13
827.23
74281 01/04/02 003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY EMP RECOGNITION SVC AWARDS 001-150-999-5265
71.51
71.51
74282 01/04/02
TIEDMOND, WILLIAM WAYNE RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT 300-199-999-5207
292.00
292.00
74283 01/04/02 003858 TOM BONEY ROOFING RES IMPRV PRGM: HILTON 165-199-813-5804
235.00
235.00
74284 01/04/02 000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC
2 TRANSFORMERS:GYM SCOREBOARD 190-187-999-5301
54.05
54.05
74285 01/04/02 004132 TRUCK HYDRAULIC EQUIPME REPAIR/MAINT-PW BOOM TRUCK 001-164-601-5214
240.00
240.00
74286 01/04/02 004001 U C REGENTS
02-03 IER SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 001-110-999-5228
100.00
100.00
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M gEST (DEF COMP
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
74287 01/04/02 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 10,755.63
001065 DEF COMP 190'2080 1,931.33
001065 DEF COMP 192"2080 2.50
001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 118.49
001065 DEF COMP 194~2080 29.52
001065 DEF COMP 280'2080 14.49
001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 88.54
001065 DEF COMP 320'2080 1,416.68
001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 145.90
74288 01/04/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 974.86
74288 01/04/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 165-2160 87.78
74288 01/04/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 190-2160 852.16
74288 01/04/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 38.70
74288 01/04/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 280'2160 25.28
14,503.08
VOUCHRE2
01/04/02 09:26
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
74288 01/04/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
74288 01/04/02 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
330-2160
340-2160
ITEM
AMOUNT
13.48
25.56
74289 01/04/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001'2120 230.30
74289 01/04/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 7.50
74289 01/04/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 31.99
74289 01/04/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 192'2120 .05
74289 01/04/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193'2120 1.80
74289 01/04/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .64
74289 01/04/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120 2.50
74289 01/04/02 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120 1.52
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 LTD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
74290 01/04/02 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF A 004819 STD
001-2380
165'2380
190'2380
192-2380
193-2380
194-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320'2380
330-2380
340-2380
001-2500
165-2500
190-2500
192-2500
193-2500
194'2500
280'2500
300'2500
320'2500
330-2500
340-2500
74292 01/04/02 VENEGAB, GINA REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190'183-4982
74293 01/04/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
74293 01/04/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
74293 01/04/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
74293 01/04/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
74293 01/04/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
74293 01/04/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
74293 01/04/02 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
74294 01/04/02 004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTI
DEC XXX-O074 GENERAL USAGE
DEC XXX'1408 PD SATELLITE STN
DEC XXX'2626 PD SATELLITE BTN
DEC XXX'2676 GENERAL USAGE
DEC XXX-3526 FIRE ALARM
DEC XXX-3564 ALARM
DEC XXX-9897 GENERAL USAGE
320-199'999'5208
001'170-999-5229
001-170-999-5229
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
PHONE SVCS/EOC BACKUP @ STN 84 32D-199'999-5208
REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982
CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
190-182-999-5212
74295 01/04/02 VICINO, DENISE
74296 01/04/02 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
1,779.06
40.02
332.17
.76
32.04
6.46
17.81
9.04
74.41
14.90
39.61
2,483.17
55.85
463.66
1.07
44.75
9.02
24.88
12.62
103.85
20.81
55.28
8.75
254.75
366.65
221.18
28.52
82.69
55.13
76.00
69.95
8.75
160.86
PAGE 12
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,017.82
276.30
5,621.24
8.~
1,084.92
69.95
8.75
160.86
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 13
01/04/02 09:26 VOUCBER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCBER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
74297 01/04/02
74290 01/04/02
74298 01/04/02
74299 01/04/02
74299 01/04/02
74299 01/04/02
74299 01/04/02
74299 01/04/02
74299 01/04/02
74299 01/04/02
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
003756 WHITE ROUSE SANITATION
WINKLER, ARGELA
WINKLER, ANGELA
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION GILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
DEC CLEANING SVC:BTRFLD STAGE
190-180-999'5250
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-3179 190-2900
REFUND:ROOM RENTAL CANCELLED 190-182-4990
NOV REPAIR/MAINT DC220 COPIER
NOV INTEREST DC220 COPIER
NOV LEASE DC220 COPIER
NOV LEASE DC50 COPIER
NOV INTEREST DC50 COPIER
NOV SASE CHARGE DC50 COPIER
NOV SASE CRARGE 5830 COPIER
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5391
330-2800
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5217
50.00
100.00
132.00
77.96
39.40
136.00
310.40
210.94
53.74
80.30
CHECK
AMOUNT
50.00
232.00
908.74
TOTAL CHECKS 262,176.65
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8
01/10/02 09:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
119,893.35
.82
3,282.32
9,522.23
521.22
2,698.36
8,821.99
5,402.92
TOTAL 181,278.19
VOUCHRE2
01/10/02 09:07
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
74302 01/10/02 000434
74303 01/10/02 003304
74304 01/10/02 004054
74305 01/10/02 004802
74305 01/10/02 004802
74306 01/10/02 001281
74307 01/10/02 004022
74308 01/10/02 000101
74308 01/10/02 000101
74308 01/10/02 000101
74308 01/10/02 000101
74308 01/10/02 000101
74308 01/10/02 000101
74309 01/10/02 001323
74309 01/10/02 001323
74309 01/10/02 001323
74309 01/10/02 001323
74310 01/10/02 003943
74310 01/10/02 003943
74310 01/10/02 003943
74311 01/10/02 004262
74311 01/10/02 004262
74312 01/10/02 003126
74312 01/10/02 003126
VENDOR
NAME
ACCELA.COM
ADAMS ADVERTISING INC
ADKISON ENGINEERS INC
ADLERHORST INTERNATIONA
ADLERHORST INTERNATIONA
ALHAMBRA GROUP
AMERICAN MINI STORAGE,
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE, INC.
ARROWNEAD WATER INC
ARROWHEAD WATER INC
ARROWHEAD WATER INC
ARROWHEAD WATER INC
BEAR STATE PUMP & EQUIP
BEAR STATE PUMP & EQUIP
BEAR STATE PUMP & EQUIP
BIO-TOX LABORATORIES
BIO-TOX LABORATORIES
BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS
BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ANNUAL CONF:4/8-12:LB/SW/CB
JAN:OLD TWN BILLBOARD AGRMNT
DEC SURVEY SVC:IST ST BRDG
EQUIPMENT FOR NEW POLICE K-9
SALES TAX
LDSCP DESIGN FOR FIRE STN 92
JAN STORAGE UNIT F105
TEMP BELP W/E 11/24 ROSS
TEMP HELP W/E 11/17 ROSS
TEMP HELP W/E 12/01 ROSS
TEMP HELP W/E 12/08 ROSS
TEMP HELP W/E 12/15 ROSS
TEMP HELP W/E 12/22 SENG
BOTTLED WTR SVCS: MUSEUM
BOTTLED WTR SVCS: MNTC FAC
BOTTLED WTR SVCS: CRC
BOTTLED WTR SVCS: CITY HALL
CRC POOL PUMP REPAIRS
LABOR AND TRAVEL TIME.
SALES TAX
LAB DRUG TEST1NG:POLICE/CHP
LAB DRUG TESTING:POLICE/CHP
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999'5258
280'199'999-5362
280-199-807-5804
001-170'999'5327
001-170'999-5327
210-165-739-5804
001-162'999'5234
001-120-999-5118
001'120'999-5118
001'120'999-5118
001'120'999-5118
001'120-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
190'185-999-5250
340-199'702'5250
190-182'999-5250
340'199-701-5250
190-186'999-5212
190'186'999-5212
190'186-999-5212
001-170-999-5328
001-170'999-5328
190-183'999-5330
190-183-999-5330
74313 01/10/02 BRATTON, CAROL REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-2582 190-2900
74314 01/10/02 004176 BROADWING
74315 01/10/02 BUACK, ALEXANDER
74315 01/10/02 BUACK, ALEXANDER
LONG DISTANCE & [NTERNET SVCS
320-199-999-5208
REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-2379 190-2900
ADDITIONAL RENTAL CHARGES 190-182-4990
FURNITURE FOR PLANNING DEPT.
FURNITURE FOR FIRE PREVENTION
FURNITURE FOR BUILD. & SAFETY
FURNITURE FOR INFO SYSTEMS
FURNITURE FOR RDA DEPT.
FURNITURE FOR RDA DEPT.
74316 01/10/02 004081 BUSINESS FURNITURE GROU
74316 01/10/02 004081 BUSINESS FURNITURE GROU
74316 01/10/02 004081 BUSINESS FURNITURE GROU
74316 01/10/02 004081 BUSINESS FURNITURE GROU
74316 01/10/02 004081 BUSINESS FURNITURE GROU
74316 01/10/02 004081 BUSINESS FURNITURE GROU
74317 01/10/02 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES
JAN RENTAL:OLD TWN RESTROOM
001-171-999-5601
001-162-999-5601
320-199-999-5250
165-199-999-5601
280-199-999-5601
280-199-999-5234
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,050.00
1,926.00
3,027.75
259.00
19.43
1,020.00
117.DD
257.40
343.20
429.00
429.00
429.00
520.00
30.56
61.81
29.01
273.62
15.00
208.00
1.13
2,032.20
277.90
324.00
268.80
100.00
1,195.00
100.00
17.00-
2,639.96
882.62
704.76
1,206.47
1,206.47
826.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,050.00
1,926.00
3,027.75
278.43
1,020.00
117.00
2,407.60
395.00
224.13
2,310.10
592.80
100.00
1,195.00
83.00
9,523.43
826.00
VOUCHBE2
01/10/02 09:07
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
74318 01/10/02
74318 01/10/02
74319 01/10/02
74320 01/10/02
74320 01/10/02
74321 01/10/02
74322 01/10/02
74323 01/10/02
74324 01/10/02
74325 01/10/02
74325 01/10/02
74325 01/10/02
74326 01/10/02
74327 01/10/02
74328 01/10/02
74329 01/10/02
74330 01/10/02
74331 01/10/02
74332 01/10/02
74332 01/10/02
74332 01/10/02
74332 01/10/02
74332 01/10/02
74332 01/10/02
74332 01/10/02
74332 01/10/02
74333 01/10/02
74334 01/10/02
74335 01/10/02
74335 01/10/02
74335 01/10/02
74335 01/10/02
74335 01/10/02
74335 01/10/02
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NUMBER
004621
004621
004228
003940
003940
001555
001193
000442
001014
001014
VENDOR
NAME
CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
iTEM
DESCRIPTION
PRGSS PMT:ST STRiPiNG PRGM
PRGSS PMT:ST STRIPING PRGM
HELIUM FOR TCC RECREATION
CBESBERS CUSTOM EMBROID 3 CiTY JACKETS W/LOGO
CHESBERS CUSTOM EMBROID SALES TAX
CHRISTOPHERSON FiRE PRO CRC:SEMi-ANNUAL FiRE SYS TEST
COLE, THOMAS
COMP U S A
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
REIMB:SCACEO CERTIFICATION PRG
MISC COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
INSTALL ALARM SYS IN MNTC FAC
COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM: NOVAMEX
COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:MASSAGE PROF
001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS CREDIT:AMOUNT EXCEEDS CONTRACT
002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC CITYWIDE TRAFFIC COUNT DATA
DALMAN~ LiSA
001393 DATA TICKET INC
REFUND: DANCE-TOT PRE-DANCE
NOV CITATION PROCESSING SVCS
004808 DINE IN DELIVERY
REFRESHMENT:HLDY LGBT & SITES
002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK
DEC SPECIAL EVENTS PREMIUMS
003317 DOMENOE, CHERYL
EE COMPUTER PURCH PRGM:DOMENOE
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELiN
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CiTY VENICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VENICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEBICLES
FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES
001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFiTi REMOVAL
DUNN, MARKCUS
REFUND:SECURiTY DEPT MB01-3470
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 RUSH
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 EBON
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP NELP W/E 12/28 MONTECINO
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 MONTECINO
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 HANSEN
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 HANSEN
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-601-5410
001-164-602-5410
190-184-999-5301
001-162-999-5243
001-162-999-5243
190-182-999-5250
001-161-999-5261
320-199-999-5242
210-190-158-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
001-164-602-5250
190-183-4982
001-170-999-5250
190-183-999-5370
300-2180
001-1175
190-180-999-5263
001-163-999-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-161-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
320-199-999-5262
001-165-999-5263
001-164-601-5218
190-2900
001-161-999-5118
340-199-701-5118
340-199-701-5118
340-199-702-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-161-999-5118
ITEM
AMOUNT
50,658.80
2,809.34
25.70
240.00
18.00
65.00
300.00
26.31
4,224.44
476.B8
1,123.32
190.00-
75.00
65.00
140.00
198.52
511.39
1,200.00
333.81
206.18
25.29
236.44
140.88
20.06
10.97
72.20
190.50
100.00
2,209.90
1,194.40
751.80
250.60
104.22
1,279.59
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
53,468.14
25.70
258.00
65.00
300.00
26.31
4,224.44
1,410.20
75.00
65.00
140.00
198.52
511.39
1,200.00
1,045.83
190.50
100.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
01/10/02 09:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CNECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
74335 01/10/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74335 01/10/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74335 01/10/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74335 01/10/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74335 01/10/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74335 01/10/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74335 01/10/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74335 01/10/02 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
74336 01/10/02 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC
74337 01/10/02 EMERY, LAURA
74338 01/10/02 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
74339 01/10/02 000478 FAST SIGNS
74339 01/10/02 000478 FAST SIGNS
74340 01/10/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
74340 01/10/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
74340 01/10/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
74340 01/10/02 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
74341 01/10/02 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
74341 01/10/02 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKEARD CENTER
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
74342 01/10/02 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
74343 01/10/02 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
74343 01/10/02 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
74344 01/10/02 FITZPATRICK, COLLEEN
74345 01/10/02 003946
74346 01/10/02 002819
74347 01/10/02 004607
74348 01/10/02 000186
74348 01/10/02 000186
74348 01/10/02 000186
74348 01/10/02 000186
G T ENTERTAINMENT
GARWIN & CHAN ASSOCIATE
GRACE BUILDING MAINTENA
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE 1NC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
HANKS HARDWARE INC
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 HANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 BANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 HANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 HANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 HANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 OBMANN
TEMP BELP W/E 12/28 HEER
TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 MCCOY
001-120-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
190-180-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-120-999-5118
001-171-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
PRJT MGMT C~JNSULTING SVCS 320-1980
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982
DEC LDSCP IMPR:MARGARITA PRK 190-180-999-5212
TEEN COUNCIL BANNER 190-185-999-5301
LETTERING FOR NEW VEHICLE:TCSD 190-180-999-5250
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
001-110-999-5230
001-164-604-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
LOT BOOK REPT:30129 VILLA ALTU 165-199-999-5250
LOT BOOK REPT:39166 RISING HIL 165-199-999~5250
XX-7824 COMERCHERO:CONF/GA-CA 001-100-999-5258
XX-7824 EOMERCHERO:CONF/GA-CA 001-100-999-5260
XX-9277 ROGERTS,R:CONF/SUPPLIE 001-1270
XX-9277 ROBERTS,R:CONF/SUPPLIE 001-100-999-5258
XX-9277 ROBERTS,R:CONF/SUPPLIE 001-100-999-5220
XX-2292 ROBERTS,G:CONF/GFOA 001-140-999-5261
XX-6165 YATES:SUPPLIES/MTGS 001-150-999-5265
XX-6165 YATES:SUPPLIES/MTGS 001-150-999-5260
XX-0432 ELMO:TEAM BLDG 001-162-999-5261
HEPATITIS B SHOT FOR EE
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
001-150-999-5250
001-150-999-5250
REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982
SANTA-FESTIVE BITEB/NLDY LIGHT 190-183-999-5370
MISC AUDIO/VIDEO SUPPLIES 320-199'999'5210
DEC CLEANING:REBTROOM/SHELTERS 190-180-999-5250
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT
SMALL TOOLS:FIRE PREVENTION
HARDWARE BUPPLIES:PW MNTC
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: CITY HALL
001-171-999'5242
001-171'999'5242
001'164'601-5218
340'199-701'5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,129.05
550.05
46.32
596.37
1,204.32
1,330.70
2,145.05
2,639.79
343.75
8.75
625.0D
94.62
68.09
12.67
14.55
12.67
12.67
150.00
150.00
3,026.71
23.46
145.40
1,109.67
128.39
915.27
515.00
29.00
569.10
70.00
120.DD
8.75
100.00
313.36
3,730.00
106.76
99.85
44.60
406.24
CHECK
AMOUNT
15,432.16
343.75
8.75
625.00
162.71
52.56
300.00
6,462.00
19D.O0
8.75
100.00
313.36
3,730.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
01/10/02 09:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CBECK
NUMBER DATE
74348 01/10/02
74348 01/10/02
74348 01/10/02
74348 01/10/02
74348 01/10/02
74348 01/10/02
74348 01/10/02
74348 01/10/02
74348 01/10/02
74349 01/10/02
74350 01/10/02
74351 01/10/02
74351 01/10/02
74351 01/10/02
74351 01/10/02
74352 01/10/02
74352 01/10/02
74353 01/10/02
74354 01/10/02
74354 01/10/02
74355 01/10/02
74355 01/10/02
74355 01/10/02
74356 01/10/02
74356 01/10/02
74356 01/10/02
74356 01/10/02
74357 01/10/02
74358 01/10/02
74359 01/10/02
74360 01/10/02
74361 01/10/02
74362 01/10/02
74363 01/10/02
74363 01/10/02
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 BANKS BARDWARE INC
000186 BANKS BARDWARE IHC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
003844 HERITAGE MEDIA CORPORAT
001517 INTEGRATED INSIGHTS DBA
002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC
002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC
002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC
002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC
004785 KRAWCBUK DEVELOPMENT IN
004785 KRAWCHUK DEVELOPMENT IN
004141 MA1NTEX INC
000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC
000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC
003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING
003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING
003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
004534 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTUR
MOMS CLUB OF MURRIETA
00417-3 MONSTENTRAK
001986 MUZAK INC
004533 MYRICK FENCE COMPANY
001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL
004152 O~MALLEY ENGINEERING CO
004152 O~MALLEY ENGINEERING CO
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: CRC
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: TCSD
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: CITY HALL
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: SR CENTER
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: TCC
BARDWARE SUPPLIES: MNTC FAC
BARDWARE SUPPLIES:PW TRAFFIC
HARDWARE SUPPLIES:PW MNTC
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: MUSEUM
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
340-199-702-5212
001-164-602-5218
001-164-601-5218
190-185-999-5212
2002 INSIDE FRONT COVER AD 001-111-999-5270
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM
001-150-999-5248
CLEAN,STORAGE,& FREIGHT CHGS
DATE CHGE:ROD RUN BANNERS
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
001-111-999-5271
001-111-999-5271
001-111-999-5271
001-111-999-5271
FAC IMPB PRGM: PERDUE & ROUTB 280-199-813-5804
CREDIT:BAL S/B PAID BY RES 280-199-813-5804
CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
190-182-999-5212
BUSINESS INFO FLYER FOR MAIL 001-161-999-5222
SALES TAX 001-161-999-5222
DEC PRGS PMT:STN 92:PW01-21 210-165-739-5804
RET.W/B PMT:FIRE BTN 92:PW0121 210-2035
CREDIT:WORK DONE BY ADK~AN ENG 210-165-~9-5804
LABELS-BLDG/ELECTRICAL:B&S
BUSINESS CARDS:POLICE (BLANK)
BUSINESS CARDS:RB/MB/BM/RN
SALES TAX
001-162-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
JAN EOC SATELLITE STN PHONE SV 001-110-999-5278
REFUND:SEC.DEP.:MS01-2043/2095 190-2900
RECRUITMENT AD:SR LIFEGUARD 001-150-999-5254
JAN MUSIC BROADCAST:OLD TOWN 001-164-603-5250
INSTALL FENCE @ TULLEY RANCH 193-180-999-5416
REISS #74041:BSKTBL ASSIGN FEE 190-187-999-5250
EXTRA WORK:MARG RD WIDEN:99-01 210-165-706-5804
SURVEY SVC:MARG RD WIDEN:99-01 210-165-706-5804
ITEM
AMOUNT
3~.99
858.86
14.21
5.35
107.39
3.86
154.61
318.68
140.31
2,715.75
574.56
217.06
1,276.00
98.89
3.19-
2,0OD.DO
950.00-
127.31
646.00
48.45
5,229.00
175.01-
495.00-
83.53
39.75
159.00
14.91
69.00
100.00
145.00
59.50
3,112.40
132.00
175.00
875.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,138.71
2,715.75
574.56
1,588.76
1,050.00
127.31
694.45
4,558.99
297.19
69.00
100.00
145.00
59.50
3,112.40
132.00
1,050.00
VOUCHRE2
01/10/02 09:07
VOUCHER/
CNECK CNECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
74364 01/10/02 002292 OASIS VENDING
74364 01/10/02 002292 OASIS VENDING
74365 01/10/02
74365 01/10/02
74365 01/10/02
74366 01/10/02
74367 01/10/02
7436B 01/10/02 003762 P M X MEDICAL
74368 01/10/02 003762 P M X MEDICAL
74368 01/10/02 003762 P M X MEDICAL
74369 01/10/02 003218 PELA
74370 01/10/02 PENN STATE
74371 01/10/02 004627 PUBLIC SAFETY TECHNOLOG
74371 01/10/02 004627 PUBLIC SAFETY TECHNOLOG
74371 01/10/02 004627 PUBLIC SAFETY TEEHNOLOG
74371 01/10/02 004627 PUBLIC SAFETY TECHNOLOG
74372 01/10/02 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE
74372 01/10/02 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE
74372 01/10/02 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE
74372 01/10/02 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE
74373 01/10/02 002012
74373 01/10/02 002012
743~ 01/10/02 002012
74374 01/10/02 000981
74375 01/10/02 000947
74376 01/10/02 004108
74377 01/10/02 004584
74378 01/10/02 000266
74379 01/10/02 000955
74380 01/10/02 0008~3 ROBERTS, RONALD H.
74381 01/10/02 000645 SMART & FINAL INC
74382 01/10/02 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
74382 01/10/02 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
CITY HALL SUPPLIES/SERVICE 340-199-701-5250
MAINT FAC SUPPLIES/SERVICE 340-199-702-5250
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-164-601-5214
190-180-999-5250
001-111-999-5260
VINYL GLOVES FOR MAIL PROCESS 340-199-701-5250
FREIGHT 340-199-701-5250
SALES TAX 340-199-701-5250
NOV/DEC LDSCP PLAN CHECK SVCS 190-180-999-5248
SMART GROWTH CF:DH/DH:l/24-26 001-161-999-5258
RADIO RENTALS 190-183-999-5370
NEADSET 190-183-999-5370
FREIGHT 190-183-999-5370
SALES TAX 190-183-999-5370
EQUIP RENTAL:TREE LGT CEREMONY 190-183-999-5370
EQUIP RENTAL:TREE LGT CEREMONY 190-183-999-5370
CANOPY RENTAL:HOLIDAY PARADE 190-183-999-5370
3 SIDEWALLS 190-183-999-5370
001-164-601-5215
001-164-601-5215
001-164-601-5215
RADAR EQUIP & REPAIR: POLICE 001-170-999-5215
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:CHAPARRAL SWIM 210'190-170-5804
SEWING NEW PATCHES ON UNIFORMS 001-170-999'5243
CRC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212
JAN EQUIP RENTAL - RIVERTON PK 190-180'999'5238
001-170-999-5370
REIMB:LEAGUE CF:12/18-20/01 001'100'999-5258
RECREATION SUPPLIES-HIGH HOPES 190-183-999'53~3
JAN 2-10-331-2153 TCC 190-1B4-999-5240
JAN 2-19-683-3255 FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEBICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VENICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES JAN DUCK POND WATER MAINT SVC
ONTARIO CONVENTION & VI ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP MTG:WOLNICK
R D 0 EQUIPMENT COMPANY REPAIRS PARTS FOR BACKHOE
R D 0 EQUIPMENT COMPANY REPAIR PARTS FOR BACKHOE
R D 0 EQUIPMENT COMPANY CREDIT:ITEM RETURNED
R H FINC
RANCNO REPROGRAPNICS
RANCHO TAILORS
REGENCY LIGHTING
RIGRTWAY
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW HOLIDAY PARADE PATROL SV:11/30
ITEM
AMOUNT
398.72
77.40
272.46
84.39
322.15
800.00
35,00
4.25
4.93
.32
2,080.00
324.00
40.00
12.00
20.00
3,90
376.47
748.43
191.05
40.00
134.42
127,07
58.71-
109.19
284.87
374.00
119.54
70.88
3,909.24
58.00
144.56
762.37
486.94
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
476.12
679.00
800.00
35.00
9.50
2,080.00
324.00
75.90
1,355,95
202.78
109.19
284.87
374.00
119.54
70.88
3,909.24
58.00
144.56
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6
01/10/02 09:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
74382 01/10/02 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
74382 01/10/02 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
74382 01/10/02 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
74383 01/10/02 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
74383 01/10/02 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
74384 01/10/02 004768 SPLASH DOWN ANCHORS
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74385 01/10/02 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
74386 01/10/02 004465 STITCH PRO
74386 01/10/02 004465 STITCH PRO
74387 01/10/02 000305 TARGET STORE
74388 01/10/02 004761 TEK TIME SYBTEMB~ LLC
74389 01/10/02 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
74390 01/10/02 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
74390 01/10/02 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
74391 01/10/02 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
74391 01/10/02 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
74391 01/10/02 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
74391 01/10/02 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
74391 01/10/02 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
74391 01/10/02 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
74391 01/10/02 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
74392 01/10/02 003862 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR.B
74392 01/10/02 003862 TNYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR.B
74392 01/10/02 003862 THYSSEHKRUPP ELEVATOR.B
74392 01/10/02 003862 TRYSBENKRUPP ELEVATOR.B
74392 01/10/02 003862 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR.B
74392 01/10/02 003862 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR.B
74393 01/10/02 003366 TORAN DEVELOP. & CONBTR
74393 01/10/02 003366 TORAH DEVELOP. & CONSTR
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CBECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
DEC 2-19-683-3263 FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319
DEC 2-02-502-8077 MAINT FAC 340-199-702-5240
DEC 2-20-347-8409 MCCABE/TMS 190-180-999-5240
MAINT FAC PEST CONTROL SVCS
TES POOL PEST CONTROL SVCS
340-199-702-5250
190-186-999-5250
TEEN COUNCIL T'SNIRTS
190-183-999'5320
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 001-2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 165'2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 190'2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 192'2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 193-2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 194-2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 280'2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 300'2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 320'2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 330-2370
W/C PREMIUM FOR DEC 2001 340-2370
C.A.P. PGRM UNIFORM SHIRTS
SALES TAX
001-170'999'5243
001'170'999-5243
SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STN 92 001-171-999-5220
TIME/DATE STAMP MACHINE MAINT. 001-140-999-5250
SUNSHINE FUND 001'2170
VAR PARKS PLUMBING SUPPLIES
VAR PARKS PLUMBING SUPPLIES
190'180-999'5212
190-180-999-5212
NOV VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
NOV VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
NOV VEBICLE FUEL USAGE
NOV VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
NOV VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
NOV VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
NOV VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
001-161-999'5263
001'170-999-5262
001-162-999'5263
001-164-601-5263
001-165-999-5263
190'180'999-5263
340'199'701-5263
CITY HALL/MUSEUM ELEV.INSPECT 190-185~999-5250
CITY NALL/MUSEUM ELEV.INSPECT 340-199-701-5250
CITY HALL/MUSEUM ELEV.INSPECT 340-199-701-5250
CITY HALL/MUSEUM PHONE MONITOR 340-199-701-5250
CREDIT:CITY MALL ELEV.IHBPECT 340-199-701-5250
CREDIT:CITY MALL ELEV.[HSPECT 340-199-701-5250
REPAIRS TO OLD TOWN ST. LIGHTS 001-164-603-5250
REPAIRS TO OLD TOWN ST. LIGHTS 001-164-603-5250
412.39
1,374.31
921.08
40.00
39.00
189.48
6,372.16
108.04
2,092.37
.82
169.92
14.01
39.17
9.83
104.21
21.46
316.37
297.00
22.27
70.36
37.63
153.57
509.30
15.06
20.10
9.14
193.51
226.03
65.97
377.25
80.08
150.00
123.56
4.44
30.00
4.44-
3.56-
1,329.50
1,782.00
3,957.09
79.00
189.48
9,248.36
319.27
70.36
37.63
153,57
524.36
972.08
300.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
01/10/02 09:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
74394 01/10/02
74394 01/10/02
74394 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74395 01/10/02
74396 01/10/02
74396 01/10/02
74397 01/10/02
74398 01/10/02
74398 01/10/02
74398 01/10/02
74398 01/10/02
74398 01/10/02
74398 01/10/02
74398 01/10/02
VENDOR
NAME
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U B POSTAL SERVICE
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
OFFICE SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS
OFFICE SUPPLIES LAND DEV.
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
NOV 2001 PLAN CHECK SVCS/B&S
DEC 2001 PLAN CHECK SVCS/B&S
CITY HALL LEGAL PUBLICATIONS
NOV LEASE 240/460 COPIERS
NOV INTEREST 240/460 COPIERS
NOV POOLED MAINTENANCE SVCS
NOV LEASE 5800 COPIER
NOV INTEREST 5800 COPIER
NOV LEASE TCC COPIER
NOV LEASE FIRE STN 84 COPIER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-604-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-110-999-5230
001-111-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-164-604-5230
001-171-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
001-120-999-5228
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5217
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
190-184-999-5239
001-171-999-5239
ITEM
AMOUNT
121.07
16.89
242.98
74.28
283.18
120.74
755.37
18.05
465.42
33.35
97.90
1.02
185.62
36.64
2,477.62
1,877.86
627.27
1,763.44
964.80
3,690.82
1,885.98
495.49
224.62
223.62
CHECK
AMOUNT
380.94
2,071.57
4,355.48
627.27
9,248.77
TOTAL CHECKS 181,278.19
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE
01/10/02 10:03 VOUCNER/COECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 0
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
AMOUNT
127,322.01
1,167.50
92,900.54
1,515,508.20
35,994.46
1,800.97
3,768.65
4,745.52
16,920.50
TOTAL 1,800,128.35
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
01/10/02 10:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
74401 01/22/02
74402 01/22/02
74403 01/22/02
74403 01/22/02
74403 01/22/02
74404 01/22/02
74404 01/22/02
74405 01/22/02
74406 01/22/02
74407 01/22/02
74407 01/22/02
74408 01/22/02
74409 01/22/02
74410 01/22/02
74410 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74411 01/22/02
74412 01/22/02
74413 01/22/02
74414 01/22/02
74414 01/22/02
74414 01/22/02
74415 01/22/02
74415 01/22/02
74416 01/22/02
74417 01/22/02
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE
004791 BARON POOL PLASTERING
004450 DENNIS A BIBBERT PLUMBI
004450 DENNIS A BIBBERT PLUMBI
004450 DENNIS A HIBBERT PLUMBI
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E $ 1 EMPLOYMENT 8ERVIC
000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
004481 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATE
004805 PEACOCK ENTERPRISES IRC
004805 PEACOCK ENTERPRISES INC
003218 PELA
000247 PESTMASTER
004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP
004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP IRC
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSN
002412 RICRARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GEMSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW
004806 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
003840 STRONGS PAINTING
003840 STRONGS PAINTING
003840 BTRONGS PAINTING
004264 SYNCNRONEX
004264 SYNCHRONEX
003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL
000310 TEMECULA CREEK INN INC
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ARTS COUNCIL COMMUNITY GRANT 190-180-999-5286
REPLASTER CRC SWIMMING POOL 190-186-999-5212
R&R RESTROOM COUNTER TOPS:CRC
LABOR TO R&R COUNTER TOPS:CRC
SALES TAX
190-182-999-5416
190-182-999-5416
190-182-999-5416
TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 NAASEH
TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 NAASEH
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
RECREATION BROCHURE PRINTING 190-180-999-5222
NOV SVCS:DIAZ RD EXTENSION 210-165-684-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
10,000.00
47,079.00
4,165.54
3,496.58
312.42
6,236.00
6,002.15
21,287.00
5,620.00
HP DESIGNJET 5000PS C6096A 320-1970 15,740.00
SALES TAX 320-1970 1,180.50
NOV/DEC PLAN CK SVCS:PLANNING 001-161-999-5250
R-O-W WEED SPRAYING CITYWIDE 001-164-601-5402
JUL DSGN SVCS:N.W.SPORTS CMPLX 210-190-173-5802
AUG DSGN SVCS:N.W.SPORTS CMPLX 210-190-1~3-5802
001-130-999-5246
165-199-999-5246
190-180-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
280-199-999-5246
261-199-999-5246
001-2643
001-2642
210-1990
210-165-7'36-5801
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
NOV 2001 BIKE PATROL SVCS 001-170-999-5326
001-170-999-5273
NOV 2001 BOOKING FEES
190-182-999-5416
190-182-999-5416
190-182-999-5416
PAINT IRON WORK/CEILING @ CRC
PAINT 10 SPEAKERS AMPITNEATER
CREDIT:AMOUNT EXCEEDS CONTRACT
TRAFFIC SIGNAL VIDEO DETECTION 001-164-602-5412
SALES TAX 001-164-602-5412
NOV DSGN SVCS:R.C.BRIDGE:99-18 210-165-710-5802
HOL.REFREBHMNT/ROOM RNTL:12/14 001-150-999-5265
10,310.00
16,567.00
13,660.61
6,466.65
25,190.99
1,167.50
1,008.00
4,745.52
3,768.65
1~800.97
13,544.47
8,797.98
309.56
351.50
5,053.08
11,702.40
5,282.00
300.00
30.00-
8,733.00
654.98
9,586.14
6,395.16
CHECK
AMOUNT
10,000.00
47,079.00
7,974.54
12,238.15
21,287.00
5,620.00
16,920.50
10,310.00
16,567.00
20,127.26
60,685.14
5,053.08
11,702.40
5,552.00
9,387.98
9,586.14
6,395.16
VOUCHRE2
01/10/02 10:D3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
74418 01/22/02
74419 01/22/02
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
001035 TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL JUL-DEC 2001 TRASH HAULING SVC 194'180-999-5315 1,515,508.20 1,515,508.20
003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN CITY~IDE TREE TRIMMING MAINT 001-164-601-5402 8,134.80 8,134.80
TOTAL CHECKS 1,800,128.35
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
City aTTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE
City MaNaGER ~
CiTY Of TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City ManagedCity Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~.
January 22, 2002
Community Development Block Grant Application Proposals for FY 2002/03
PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendation from the
Finance Committee and staff.
Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements and to reprogram
CDBG funds from completed projects in accordance with the current budget resolution for
general administration of the Fiscal Year 2002-03 Community Development Block Grant Funds.
DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered bythe Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in which funding is allocated to the City annually through
the Economic Development Agency (EDA) of Riverside County.
The application requests were also reviewed for eligibility for CDBG funding by our program
representative at the EDA and all of the applications are eligible for funding. In order for a project to be
considered for funding, it must meet one of the following national goals:
The activity benefits 51 percent Iow/moderate income persons; or,
The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or,
The activity meets an emergent community development need.
A total of twelve (12) applications were submitted to the City for consideration and all were determined
to be eligible for CDBG funding. The City's allocation for FY 02/03 is anticipated to be $352,623.
CDBG regulations impose a 15 percent cap from the total allocation or a maximum expenditure of
$52,893 for Public Services. A balance of $299,730 is available for public facilities and capital
improvement projects (refer to table on the following page).
FY 02~03 CDBG ALLOCATION
FUNDING CATEGORY FUNDING ALLOCATION
2002-03 CDBG Allocation - estimate $352,623
Less Public Services (15% CAP) -52,893
Project Funding available for Public Facilities/Infrastructure $299,730
Due to the possibility that the City's allocation may be reduced, it is recommended that all projects
be reduced equally, according to the percentage in allocation reduction. All projects are subject to
final approval at a future Riverside County Board of Supervisors meeting. The EDA will submit a
supplemental agreement to the City identifying the projects approved for funding in June 2002.
Also, for general information this FY 200212003 CDBG funding cycle begins the third and last year of
a three-year cooperation agreement with the County E DA. At the term of this agreement the City will
submit for entitlement status with HUD.
After thorough review, the Finance Committee, composed of Mayor Pro-Tern, Jeff Stone, and
Councilmember, Mike Naggar, are proposing CDBG funding for seven (7) public service
organizations and two (2) City capital projects as described in the attachment.
FISCAL IMPACT: The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have no impact on the City,
other than staff time needed to administer program requirements.
Attachments: 1. Finance Committee Recommendations
2. FY 02/03 CDBG Applications Funding Summary
FINANCE COMMITTEE FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
Funding Finance Committee
Public Services Requested Funding Recommendation
Boys & Girls Club of Temecula 30,000 11,000
Emergency Food Aid 10,000 10,000
Alternatives to Domestic Violence (ADV) 35,000 10,000
Operation School Bell 15,000 11,000
YMCA 10,000 4,500
Rape Crisis Center 5,000 4,000
Riverside Latino Commission 30,000 0
American Red Cross Riverside County 4,500 2,393
Total Public Services Projects (15% Cap
= $52,839)
$139~500 $52.893
Non-Public Service Projects Funding Finance Committee
Facility Expansion Requested Funding Recommendation
Old Town Temecula Gym 249,730 249,730
TCSD - Temecula Middle School ADA 220,000 0
Improvements
Sam Hicks Monument Park 105,050 0
Replacement
RDA - Pujol Street Sidewalk Phase II 50,000 50,000
Total Non-Public Service $624.780 $299.730
GRAND TOTAL $764~280 $352;623
City of Temecula
FY 02/03 CDBG Applications Funding Summary
FUNDING QUALIFYING PROJECT SUMMARY
APPLICATION TITLE AGENCY REQUEST CRITERIA
Boys & Girls Club of Boys & Girls Public Service/ Scholarship program for Iow-
Temecula Club of $30,000 Low-Mod Income income families to pa~icipate
Temecula in AM/PM Camp activities &
transportation.
Emergency Food & Temecula Public Service/ Provide emergency food
Aid Senior Center $10,000 Limited Clientele distribution and limited utility
assistance to households
based on referrals from Social
Services and local chumhes.
Alternatives to Alternatives to Public Service/ Provide 24-hour crisis
Domestic Violence Domestic $35,000 Limited Clientele intervention, advocacy
Violence services, shelter, community
education and the Children's
Support Program.
Operation School Asst. League of Public Service/ Provide clothing to children
Bell Temecula $15,000 Low-Mod Income identified byTVUSD in need of
Valley clothing.
YMCA YMCA Public Service/ This program will provide
$10,000 Low-Mod Income scholarships to day camp for
under privileged children at
Temecula Elementary School.
Riverside County Local Rape Public Service/ This program provides
Rape Crisis Center Crisis Center $5,000 Low-Mod Income assistance to victims of
sexual assault in the
Temecula area at Rancho
Springs Medical Center.
Riverside County Latino Public Service/ This application is to build a
Latino Commission Rehabilitation $30,000 Low-Mod Income Latino drug and alcohol abuse
Center Rehabilitation Center in Indio
Hills, CA.
American Red Public Service/ CDBG funds are requested for
American Red Cross Cross of ~4,500 Low-Mod Income babysitting and child care
of Riverside County Riverside training for Iow and
County moderately Iow income
children at the Temecula Red
Cross Location.
Subtotal Public $139.500
Services
City of Temecula
FY 02/03 CDBG Applications Funding Summary
FUNDING QUALIFYING PROJECT SUMMARY
APPLICATION TITLE AGENCY REQUEST CRITERIA
Old Town Temecuia Temecula Design and construct an
Gymnasium Community $249,730 Public Facility indoor Gymnasium in Old
Services Town with approx 5,800 sq ft
District and spectator seating.
Estimated Cost to build is
$950K. The City will partner
with the Temecula Boys &
Girls Club on this project.
Temecula Schools Temecula Public Facility Design and install concrete
ADA Improvements Community $220,000 sidewalks to the remaining
(James L Day Services sports fields that are located
Middle, Temecula District at the schools.
Middle & Margarita
Middle Schools)
Sam Hicks Temecula Public Facility Improve the park play
Monument Park Community $t 05,050 structures to meet all ADA
Replacement Services standards.
District
Pujol Street Temecula Public Facility Design and install concrete
Sidewalk Phase II Redevelopment ~50,000 sidewalks Curbs and Cutters.
Agency
Subtotal Facility/
Infrastructure
TOTAL FUNDING
REQUESTED
2
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City ManagedCity Council
Howard Windsor, Fire Chief
January 22, 2002
Purchase of one (1) Fire Department Rescue Squad Vehicle
Prepared by: Howard Windsor, Fire Chief and Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Authorize the City Manager to submit the request for six (6) additional fire personnel to the
County Department of Fire for staffing the second medic squad beginning July 1, 2002.
2. Approve the pumhase of one (1) 2002 Ford 550 Cab and Chassis from Rancho Ford Lincoln
Memury in the amount of $35,831.
3. Approve the purchase of the Rescue Squad Vehicle Apparatus from KME in the amount of
$67,437.
4. Authorize a budget transfer from the Fire operating budget to the vehicle internal service fund for
$103,268.
DISCUSSION: On September 15, 1999, the first City of Temecula "Paramedic Assessment Squad"
(PAS) went into service at the Parkview Fire Station (Station #84). During the first year the "PAS"
responded to a total of 2,755 incidents in the City. To date for year 2001, the "PAS" has responded
to nearly 3,000 calls. With the Annexation of the Vail Ranch Area and the expected growth of the
City, a second squad is needed to maintain the desired five-minute response times for Emergency
Medical services within the City.
To increase the number of personnel under the current Cooperative Fire Services Agreement with
the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and Riverside County Fire Department, a formal
authorization request letter is necessary for the appropriate process to be initiated within the State
and County Fire Department systems. Six additional paramedics will be added to the current City fire
contract to staff the second "PAS". This staff will include one Fire Captain/Paramedic who will
assume the Paramedic Liaison responsibilities, two Fire Apparatus EngineedParamedics, and three
Firefighter II/Paramedics. The process to add additional positions to the fire contract usually requires
sixty to ninety days. The increased personnel cost for the second "PAS" staff is $501,337.00. The
second "PAS" should be available to begin emergency response as of July 1, 2002. All increased
fire costs associated with the second "PAS" will be addressed in the upcoming fiscal year 2002/2003
operating budget.
Staff's investigation into the availability and source of this highly specialized vehicle configuration
determined a sole source vendor Rancho Ford that could deliver the cab and chassis in the needed
timeframe. Also, Ford Motor Company is the only company in production of the cab and chassis that
will meet the county standards and specifications.
Bids for the Rescue Squad Vehicle Apparatus were solicited from three (3) companies specializing in
highly specialized fire rescue apparatus. The bids results are listed below and all are based on a
120-day delivery schedule.
Sole source Cab and Chassis purchase:
Dealer Vehicle/Model
Rancho Ford Lincoln F-550 Extended Cab and
Mercury Chassis (2002)
Price
$35,831
Fire Rescue Squad Vehicle Apparatus Purchase:
Dealer
KME
Price
$67,437
Pierce $70,155
Rector $78,826
A state grant from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has been secured for a total amount of $49,000.
The OTS grant can fund 25% or $25,817 of the cost of the rescue squad vehicle. The remaining
grand funds will be used to purchase rescue squad equipment.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the operating budget to purchase this rescue
squad vehicle.
ITEM 6
APPROVAL
ClTY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOR OF F~NA.~N~--~-'~-_,~4~
CITY MANAGER~/.~_/
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City/~er/City Council
Grarf~Y,/I. Yates, Assistant to the City Manager
DATE:
January 22, 2002
SUBJECT:
2002 Workers' Compensation Coverage Annual Renewal
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council select State Compensation Insurance Fund as the
City's Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance, for Plan Year 2002.
BACKGROUND: Workers' Compensation Insurance in California continues to undergo dramatic
changes, both in the areas of availability and cost to the insurance buyer. Fueled by "open rating"
market competition and increases in claims costs over the past seven years, carriers providing
workers' compensation coverage have experienced such negative results, that the second largest
writer in California, Superior National, is no longer in the workers' compensation arena. Firemen's
Fund-and-Fremont-Compensation-are-no-longer-writing-workers' compensation coverage in ....
California. State Compensation Insurance Fund has done a fine job covering the City and staff is
happy with the service State Fund has provided. Last year's premium was $138,000.
The City's insurance broker, Mike Bush of CAL-SURANCE Associates, Inc., requested thideen (12)
market quotes. Mr. Bush was allowed to quote components in an effort to ensure that the market
carriers knew the City was serious about obtaining the best coverage at the lowest rate. A majority
of the 12 carriers declined to quote on the City's coverage. Mr. Bush did receive quotes from:
American International Group Companies (American Home) and State Compensation Insurance
Fund. The increase reflected in the State Fund quote includes a 25% increase in their base rates
and the City's experience modification increasing from 68% to 85%. The rates listed below
represent the quotes for the 2002 Workers' Compensation Plan Year (2/01/02 - 1/31/03):
American Home $270,000
State Comp. Insurance Fund $176,000
Based on the above listed quotes, City staff recommends the City's new workers' compensation
coverage be awarded to State Compensation Insurance fund, for the 2002 Plan Year. The State
Compensation Insurance Fund quote reflects the maximum amount for the contract year and may
be lower depending on actual payroll. Staff believes the quote reflects the best that can be
expected for the 2002 contract year. Our Loss Prevention Program will remain under the leadership
of the City's Safety Committee.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the operating budget to fund this policy.
Maximum amount of quote maybe less based on actual payroll.
J~N-15-2002 TU~ 0~:5@ PH ~X NO, P. 02
_C_A -su ^n,ce
PROPOSAL OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
INSURANCE
~or
CITY OF TEMECULA
Coverage Inception Date:
02-01-02
Presented by:
Michael Bush
Sr. Vice President
Ianuary 15, 2002
J~N-15-2002 TU~ 03:5~ PH ~X NO. P, O~
INTRODUCTION TO CAL-SURANCE
CaI-Surance Associates, Inc., a member of the Cal-Surance Group, is a full service
insurance brokerage. Specializing in Municipal and Commercial Property, Casualty and
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Risk Management Services, CaI-Surance
represents you, our Clients.
Founded in 1962, we are currently ranked as the 54th largest broker in the country, and
the largest independently owned agency/broker in California.
Our philosophy is client oriented. We strive to provide our customers with
comprehensive programs to properly confront their exposures to loss, through:
· Insurance contracts with the best available companies, with the best available
conditions, at the lowest possible cost.
· Risk Management techniques to transfer, reduce and control exposures and their
cost.
Our final goal is to reduce the ultimate net cost of risk for our clients and to provide
services in a professional manner.
You are professionals in your field as we are professionals in ours. By using Cal-
Surance to assist in developing and maintaining your insurance program you will frae
up your resources and add to the expertise needed for maximum efficiency and
eConomy.
FORM iS FOR iLLUSTRA ]30N ONLY. READ YOUR POL/CY FOR SPECIFIC DETAIL&
JRN-~-2002 TUE 03:~9 P~ ~RX NO, P, 04
SERVICE TEAM
Account Executive:
Mike Bush
Senior Vice President
Direct Line: (714) 939-7453
Car Phone: (714) 342-2542
Home Phone: (714) 998-7479
Fax Line: (714) 939-1654
Senior Account Administrator:
Judy Pavlik-Huyg, ClC
Direct Line: (714) 939-7455
Fax Line: (714) 939-1654
Account Administrator:
Sylvia Valdez
Direct Line: (714) 939-7464
Fax Line: (714) 939-1654
Call Our Toll Free "800' Number
1-800-762-7800
THIS FORM I$ FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAII.~
J~N-15-2002 TUE 03:59 PM ?AX NO, P, 05
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
EXPE~CE MODIFICATION
Your experience modification for the current year 2002, February 1st is
85%.
THIS MODIFICATION WAS DEVELOPED BY THE CALIFORNIA WORKERS'
COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BUREAU BASED UPON YOUR INDIVIDUAL
CLAIMS EXPERIENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING YEARS:
2000
1999
1998
J~N-15-2002 TU~ 03:5@ PH ~X NO, P, 08
MARKETS APPROACHED BY CAL-SURANCE
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
AMERICAN INTERNATtONAL GROUP
COMPANIES (AIG) - AMERICAN HOME
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
REPUBLIC INDEMNITY' COMPANY
CONNECTICUT INDEMNITY COMPANY
LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY
CLARENDON INSURANCE COMPANY
ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY
EVEREST INSURANCE COMPANY
CNA INSURANCE COMPANY
CHUBI~ GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES
Quotation Provided
$270,000+ Premium Indicated
Declined
Declined
Declined
Declined
Declined
Declined
Declined
Declined
Declined
Declined
Partial list of carriers no Ionaer writina Workersl Comoensation in California:
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (Discontinued Writing)
· Great States insurance Company (Liquidation)
· HIH America Comp And Liability Insurance Company (Liquidation)
· Reliance Insurance Company (Liquidation)
Credit General Insurance Company (Liquidation)
Fremont Compensation Insurance Company (Regulatory Supervision)
THI~ FOt~M IS FOR ILLU$ 7'RA TION QNL ¥. READ YOUR ~:)LICy FOR SPECIFJC. DE't'AIL.~
J~N-16-2002 TUE 03:59 PM F~X NO, P, O?
AREAS OF MAIOR CONCERN
(,4~)DKESSED BY C~AL=SURANCE AND STAI'E COMPENSATION INSUILAHCE FUND)
1. Safety Committee Attendance (Discuss)
A. Carder Loss Control Support
B. Film Library Available
C. Attendance by Cal-Surance
2. Written Safety Program (Review and Update)
3. Reserve Reviews (Frequency Discuss)
4. Claims Record Keeping
A. Ease of Reporting
B, Exchange of Information
5. Accident Investigation
THIS FORM ,~ FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLy, READ YOUR POLICY FOR .~E'CIFIC D~TAILS.
JRN-15-2002 TUE 03:59 PM FRX NO, P, 08
STATE COMPENSATION INSLTRANCE FUND
Best's Rating and Financial Size:
B+: Xlll; Admitted
11. Location:
Santa Ana, CA
III.
Strong Points:
Loss Prevention, California Workers' Compensation Specialty Company,
Largest Writer of Workers' Compensation in California.
Review Services
Per Areas of Major Concern Section
JRN-15-2002 TUE 04:00 PN FRX NO, ?. 09
PROPOSAL
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Policy Period:
Estimated Annual Premium:
Type of Policy:
02-01-02 to 02-01-03
$171,632 plus State Mandated Fees
One Year - Participating Plan
Classifioation Code Payroll Rate Premium
Municipal (non-manual) 9410 $4,138,912 5.49 $227,226
Municipal (all other) 9420 $544,860 18.40 100,254
Clerical 8810 $2,011,192 1.70 34,190
Subtotal: $361,670
Estimated Modification: x .85
Modified Premium: $307,420
Premium Modifier (including Estimated Premium Discount Factor):x .55830
Estimated Total Premium: $171,632
(Approx,) California Admn. & Fraud Assessment: + 633
California CIGA Fee: + 3,433
Payment Terms:
10% Down, Monthly Installments or Audits (Discuss)
201)1 Rates 2002 Rates
Code w~out Modification With M~ification Without ModlficaUon With Modificailml
68% 85%
9410 2.43 1.65 3.07 2.61
9420 8.15 5.55 10.27 8.73
8810 .78 .53 .95 .81
Premium using 2002 payroll and modification and 2001 rates = $136,796 (25.5% rate increase)
THiS FORM iS IrOR ILLUSTRATION ONL¥, READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAII.~
ITEM 7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
AnthonyJ. Elmo, DimctorofBuilding and Salty
Janua~ 22,2002
StreetName Changefrom Saric Courtto Mountain View
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02__
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME
FROM SARIC COURT TO MOUNTAIN VIEW.
DISCUSSION: The Property Owners of the three parcels on Saric Court have
requested a street name change to Mountain View, Their request has been
reviewed and accepted by the County 911 response coordinator, There are no
buildings constructed at the present time.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
1/I6/02
Date:
To: Carol Brockmeier, for the City of Temecula
Subject: Street Name Change
We are one of the three lot owners on Saric Court in Temecula. We request the name of
the street to be changed as follows:
Old street name: Saric Court
New street name: Mountain View
Our lot APN is (~ziV~ -{~(~ '~ ~.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Current
address:
Date:
To: Carol Brockmeier, for the City of Temecula
Subject: Street Name Change
We are one of the three lot owners on Saric Court in Temecula. We request the name of
the street to be changed as follows:
Old street name: Saric Court
New street name: Mountain View
Our lot APN is q 1.~ 5 - 060 - O'2-.q
Thank you.
NalTle~
Sincerely,
Current
address: B 0 (o ~v 0
Date: I r~ [~)~
To: Carol Brockmeier, for the City of Temecula
Subject: Street Name Change
We are one of the three lot owners on Saric Court in Temecula. We request the name of
the street,to be changed as follows:
Old street name: Saric Court
New street name: Mountain View
Our lot APN is ~5-O6~D-O.~
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Nallle~
Current
address:
Phone: (.-c~ 0 q,) /oqq--qltO
RESOLUTION NO. 02-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME
FROM SARIC COURT TO MOUNTAIN VIEW
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as
follows:
WHEREAS, Section 3409.1 and 3408.1 and 34092 of the Government
Code provides for changing the name of a public street, and:
WHEREAS, the owners of Assessors Parcel Nos. 945-060-007, 945-060-
08 and 945-060-029 have requested a name change from Saric Court to
Mountain View:
WHEREAS, all property owners are in favor of renaming the street to
Mountain View.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Temecula determines and orders that the name of Saric Court be changed to
Mountain View.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby
certify that Resolution No. 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecul~-at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22°d
day of January, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC,
City Clerk
ITEM 8
APPROVAL ~'"'~, ,,~
CITY ATTORNEY /~ ~/,,~'~
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~CE~
CiTY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Herman Parker, Director of Community Services
January 22, 2002
Needs Assessment for Library Bond Act
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1) Award a contract in the amount of $34,500.00 to Godbe Research & Analysis (GRA) for
conducting a public opinion needs assessment for receiving Prep 14 funds.
2) Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed $3,450.00 which is equal to
10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: In March 2000, a state-wide ballot measure was approved by voters titled,
Proposition 14-California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and
Renovation of 2000. This is a competitive, state-wide grant program that will provide 65% of all
eligible construction related expenses. The first round of applications for these funds will be due in
June 2002.
The City Council has previously set aside the required 35% match for the new library project. In
addition, the completed library design has taken into account the joint-use/cooperative agreement
programs proposed with the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD). Joint-
Use/Cooperative programs are being given higher priority for funding consideration. The library
design also displays state of the art technology that will contribute towards the grant application.
It is staff's recommendation to enter into an agreement with Godbe Research & Analysis (GPA) for
the needs assessment. Rick Sarles, an Associate Research Director with Godbe Research &
Analysis, will conduct the needs assessment with several desired components. The tasks involved
in the needs assessment include: a series of 12 executive interviews (20-30 minutes in length)with
key community members (e.g., City Manager, library commissioner, a County Supervisor), a series
of six community workshops with key community groups (e.g., Friends of the Library, Boys & Girls
Club, seniors and residents, and a 12-minute telephone survey of adult residents in Spanish as well
as English.
As an additional component of the application process, Godbe Research & Analysis, will be working
in conjunction with Beverley Simmons and Associates-Library Management Consultants and City
staffto conduct this statistical research. In preparation of this application, City Staffwili be working
very closely with all members of this team including: LPA (librarydesign firm), The Wilson Group
(legislative advocate firm for the City of Temecula), Riverside County, and the Temecula Valley
Unified School District.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds have been included and are available in the Capital Improvement
Program-Library budget
Attachments: Godbe Research & Anal~is (GPA) Contract & Needs Assessment Proposal
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR NEEDS ASSESSMENT
(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of January 22, 2002, between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City"), and Godbe Research & Analysis (GPA). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on January 22, 2002, and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
July 1, 2002, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall
complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Research
Director shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Research Director hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City shall pay half of the fees for these services upon receipt of the
signed agreement in the amount of $17,250.00 and the remaining half ($17,250.00) upon
completion and mailing of the final application. This amount shall not exceed thirty-four thousand
five hundred ($34,500.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is
approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City
Council.
c. Because this project will be billed at a fixed fee, rather than on an hourly
basis, two invoices will be submitted in accordance to the specifications outlined in section 4a
above.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates
a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant ~ll submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its
designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and
audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained fora period of
three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or
otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the
City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer ties.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which
the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or
wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's e~clusive direction and control. Neither Citynor any of its
officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in
any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power
to incur any debt, obligation or liabilitywhatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
9 LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any
way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
10. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without wdtten
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, headng or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to
review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review
any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
11. NOTICES. Any notices which either pady may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
To Consultant:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
Godbe Research & Analysis
640 Grand Avenue; Suite G
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attn: Rick Sarles
4
12. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement,
only Beverley Simmons & Associates-Library Management Consultants shall perform the services
described in this Agreement. Beverley Simmons & Associates-Library Management Consultants
may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this
Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of
assistants from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall
have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said
notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be
otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
13. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
14. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation ofthis Agreement. Anylitigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of lifigation between the parties concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and
reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All pdor or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are
merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entedng into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each partes own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
16. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of [ts obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Godbe Research & Analysis (GRA)
By
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
SCOPE OF WORK
Needs Assessment Tasks
I. Scope of Project
The following is the general outline of the work plan that the City is expecting from the selected
consultant:
Develop a checklist of needs assessment components. This task will guide the
entire project as all items to be completed will be entered on the project list and the
list will be monitored to ensure that all assessment components are completed in a
timely fashion.
Collect and compile all supporting documents required to complete the needs
assessment, including:
1. 12 One to One interviews with Key Community Members
2. 6 Workshops (5 with Key Community Groups and 1 with residents)
3. 12-minute Telephone Survey of 400 Residents (English & Spanish)
4. Attendance to Jan 30 All-Day Meeting
Complete the needs assessment in draft form for review and comment.
Compile and present the completed needs assessment at one meeting.
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
The City shall pay half of the fees for these services upon receipt of the signed agreement in the
amount of $17,250.00 and the remaining half ($17,250.00) upon completion and mailing of the final
application. This amount shall not exceed thirty-four thousand five hundred ($34,500.00) for the
total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
January 2,2002
To: Aaron Adams
From: Rick Sarles
Re: Needs Assessment Costs
Hi Aaron,
Godbe Research & Analysis (GRA) understands that the City of Temecula is
interested in conducting a public opinion needs assessment as a required
component of the application for receiving Prop 14 funds.
Given our prior discussions and our meeting on December 20 I have put together
the following costs, which reflect all desired components of the needs
assessment. These tasks include: a series of 12 executive interviews (20-30
mins in length) with key community members (e.g., City manager, library
commissioner, a County supervisor), a series of six community workshops with
key community groups (e.g., Friends of the Library, Boys & Girls Club, seniors)
and residents, and a 12-minute telephone survey of adult residents.
As discussed at our December 20t~ meeting, the executive interviews will be
organized by the City and will take place over the course of one day at Temecula
City offices. During the evening of the executive interviews, the first of the five
workshops will take place, and the remaining four will be completed the following
day. These workshops will also be organized by the City and take place at
Temecula City offices. The structure of the workshops will be a one to two hour
discussion moderated by GRA staff that will proceed according to a City-
approved discussion guide covering topics required by the Prop. 14 grant
application.
I have also included two other items that were mentioned in our meeting. First,
conducting telephone interviews in Spanish as well as English. And second,
attendance to a workshop on January 30 entitled 'How to Apply for a Library
Bond Act Grant.' It sounded as if attendance to the State's workshop was
optional, so I singled out that item in the costs.
The cost estimates on the following page reflect our understanding of this work
scope, which consists of one meeting to discuss research objectives, developing
a discussion guide for the executive interviews and the workshops, conducting
the interviews and the workshops, crafting and revising a survey instrument,
CATI programming the instrument, developing a sampling frame and purchasing
the sample, conducting phone interviews in English and Spanish, processing,
weighting (if necessary), and analyzing the data, writing a summary report for the
executive interviews and workshops, and a full report for the entire project, and
presenting the results of the entire study at one meeting.
If you have any questions please call me at (760) 730-2943.
Sincerely,
Rick Sarles
Associate Research Director
Below are the tasks and costs required to complete the project. The prices reflect
a firm, fixed-fee to complete the respective projects. The overall cost will not
exceed those shown below, provided that the parameters of the project (i.e.,
survey length, sample size, number of workshops) conform to those shown
below.
Executive Interviews
Cost for 12 Interviews
t Management $500.00
rch Fee $3,500.00
L FOR 12 INTERVIEWS $4,000.00
Workshops
Task
Cost per Workshop
Facility
Catering
Project Management
Research Fee
Miscellaneous Expenses
TOTAL PER GROUP
Provided by City
$100.00
$500.00
$1,400.00
$100.00
$2,100.00
Telephone Survey
Task
Cost for 12-min Interview
Random Sample
3retest
Translation into Spanish
3ATI Programming
telephone Interviewing (375 English)
$670.0C
$375.0£
$525.0C
$700.0C
$5,440.0C
telephone Interviewing (25 Spanish)
:)ata Processing
Research Fee
Project Management
Miscellaneous Expenses
TOTAL FOR 400 INTERVIEWS
$450.0C
$940.0C
$5,975.0C
$1,500.0C
$325.0C
$16,900.0C
Additional Meeting
ional Meeting (Jan 30)
JTOTAL FOR ONE-DAY ATTENDANCE
Cost for 8-hour Meetin
$1,000.00
$1,000.0a
Total Costs
rask Total Cost
12 One-one-One interviews with Key
3ommunity Members
Workshops (5 with Key Community
Groups and 1 with residents)
2~minute Telephone Survey of 400
~esidents (English & Spanish)
~,ttendance to Jan 30 All-day Meeting
3RAND TOTAL
$4,000.00
$12,600.00
$16,900.00
$1,000.00
$34,500.00
Below is the list of tasks associated with this project and the time required to
complete the tasks. These estimates are firm baring any changes to the research
objectives or unforeseen delays (e.g., in September we suspended data
collection following the terrorist attacks). Because of the extensive qualitative and
quantitative components of the study, GRA estimates that the project will take
approximately 14 weeks to complete (some tasks overlap). Should the City of
Temecula have particular time constraints to be considered, GRA would be
happy to revisit the timeline and discuss alternatives. Once dates have been set
for the executive interviews and community workshops, these can be plugged
into the calendar.
l'ask Time required
nitial Client Meeting 1 day
:3iscussion Guide Drafting 6 days
Norkshop Guide Drafting 6 days
.3onduct Executive Interviews 1 day
2.onduct Workshops 3 days
~,ttendance to State Workshop 1 day
;)raft Summary Report 5 days
3elivery of Summary Report 1 dayI
iQuestionnaire Drafting 10 daysI
iDelivery of Questionnaire Draft 1 dayI
Client Review of Questionnaire 5 days
Questionnaire Revisions 5 days
'3uestionnaire Pretest 1 dayI
:inalize Questionnaire 1 dayI
CATI Programming 3 daysI
Telephone Interviewing 7 daysI
Data Processing 5 daysI
Delivery of Topline Data 1 dayI
Data Analysis 5 days
Report Writing 10 days
Delivery of Report 1 day
Presentations of Findings 1 day
ITEM 9
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Herman Parker, Director of Community Services,~,
January 22, 2002
Department of Parks and Recreation Riparian and Riverine Habitat
Program
PREPARED BY:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR GRANT
FUNDS FOR THE RIPARIAN AND RIVERINE HABITAT GRANT
PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN
WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACTOF
2000
DISCUSSION: The Riparian and Riverine Habitat Grant Program, Safe Neighborhood
Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 provides for Riparian and
Riverine Habitat grant funding to California cities, counties and districts to provide for increased
public recreational access, awareness, understanding, enjoyment, protection and restoration of
California's irreplaceable rivers and streams.
Eligible Projects shall include the acquisition, development or improvement of recreation areas,
open space, parks and trails in close proximity to rivers and streams. Community Services will use
any grant funds received improve trail segments along Murrieta Creek.
FISCAL IMPACT: TCSD will be apply for a grant of $400,000 which is the maximum amount that
can be requested. The trail improvements will be made to the extent that it is funded by the grant.
There will not be a fiscal impact to the City's funds.
R:',srnithb\Per Capita~Staff Report Ripadan Grant.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2002
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT
FUNDS FOR THE RIPARIAN AND RIVERINE HABITAT PROGRAM
UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER,
CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000
FOR TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS ALONG MURRIETA CREEK.
THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the RIPARIAN AND
RIVERINE HABITAT PROGRAM, which provides funds to the State of California for grants to local
agencies and federally recognized California Indian tribes to increase public recreational access,
awareness, understanding, enjoyment and protection of California's irreplaceable rivers and
streams, and
WHEREAS, The California Depadment of Parks and Recreation has been delegated
the responsibility for the administration of the program and the grant Project shown above within the
State, setting up necessary procedures, and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and
Recreation require the Applicant's Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of the
Application before submission of said Application to the State, and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California for the
project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby:
Approves the filing of an Application for local assistance funds from the
RIPARIAN AND RIVERINE HABITAT PROGRAM under the Safe Neighborhood
Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000; and
2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and
maintain the project; and
3. Certifies that the Grantee has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General
Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and
Appoints the City Manager or designee, as agent to conduct all negotiations,
execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications,
agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the
completion of projects,
R:Xsmithb~Per Capita~Reso-Riparian Grant.doc 01/02/2002
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting held on January 22, 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 2002- was duly adopted at the regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of January, 2002 by the following mil call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:XsmithbXPer Capita~Reso-Riparian Grant.doc 01/02/2002
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Grant Yates, Assistant to the City Manager
January 22, 2002
Resolution of Support- Proposition 42 "Transportation Congestion
Improvement Act"
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider adopting the following resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 42-
''TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT"
BACKGROUND: Preposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act will be on
March 5, 2002 the statewide ballot.
Preposition 42 would allocate a portion of the existinq state sales tax on gasoline to cities and
counties to be used for transportation improvements. In Riverside County, examples of projects
awaiting completion are:
· Railroad grade separation on major streets
· Improving MetroLink Service
· Improvements to 1-215
· Widening of 1-15 from Temecula to Corona
· Construction of a new East-West corridor between Riverside and Orange County
· Interchange improvements along 1-10 in Coachella Valley
· Improvement to local bus services
Cities and Counties combined will receive 40 percent of Preposition 42 revenues. Twenty percent
will be earmarked for cities for local street repairs and maintenance. Twenty percent of the revenue
will be earmarked for counties for local read repairs and maintenance. Another 20 percent is
provided to public transit agencies, and the remaining 40 percent goes to the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), which is primarily composed of locally-identified projects.
Gasoline sales tax revenues were estimated at $1.3 billion in 2001-02. Future year revenues are
expected to vary from $1.2 to $1.5 billion depending on the price of gas.
Beginning July 2003, all gasoline sales taxes would go directly for transportation improvements.
Traffic relief and road improvement projects in the governor's existing transportation plan get first
call on that revenue until 2008 (and that's expected to use a little more than half the revenues). The
rest, and allfunds after 2008, would be dedicated to repairing and improving our roads and mass
transit systems.
It is estimated that $35-40 million annually would be available for distribution to Riverside County for
use by cities, the County, transit and RCTC exclusively for transportation purposes.
Proposition 42 is an important measure for all cities and counties as it would provide a much needed
omgoing reliable source of funding for our streets, roads, and other local transportation projects.
Proposition 42 is especially important now as many local transportation sales tax measures are set
to expire over the next few years.
The League of California Cities, CSAC, and Riverside County Transit have all endorsed Proposition
42.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 42-
"TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT"
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help make our roads safer and reduce traffic without
higher taxes by requiring the gasoline taxes we already pay be used to improve mass transit,
highways, and local roads; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 is based on the principle that taxes paid at the gas pump
should be used for transportation purposes; and
WHEREAS, traffic is paralyzing travel with Los Angeles now ranked the number one
most congested urban area in the country, San Francisco/Oakland second, San Diego sixth and
Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino/Riverside following close behind;
WHEREAS, with our neglected transportation system needing attention, California has
the third worst deteriorated roads in the nation and more than 6000 of our bridges and
overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway safety or design standards; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will provide a stable and ongoing source of transportation
funding that will make it possible to plan our future transportation needs; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will guarantee funds to every city and county to help fix
potholes, repair dangerous road conditions and improve the safety of children walking or biking
to school; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help speed up highway safety and traffic relief projects,
and expand and improve mass transit systems; and
WHEREAS, all Proposition 42 projects will be subject to an annual audit and standard
accounting practices to ensure they are delivered on time and on budget; and
WHEREAS, by speeding up transportation projects thousands of new construction and
other jobs will be created, our economy will be stimulated and every dollar invested in our
highways will result in almost six times that in economic benefits.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, that the City of Temecula supports Proposition 42-
"Transportation Congestion Improvement Act" in the interest of:
1. Allocating a portion of the existing state sales tax on gasoline to cities and counties to be
used for transportation improvements.
2. Creating jobs to stimulate the economy through transportation projects, which create
thousands of new jobs in construction, engineering and related services.
3. Joining in a coordinated effort to improve highway, bridge and street safety by fixing
potholes, repairing dangerous roads, highways, bridges, intersections and school routes.
4. Supporting traffic relief projects on highways and local roads, and expand local bus and
commuter services.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, this Resolution has been executed by the City Council of the
City of Temecula, at a meeting held on the 22"dday of January, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAI_]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 02- was duly adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 29th day of January, 2002, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNClLMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
COUNClLMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 11
CITY ATTORNEY ,/ ~ ~"'"u
DIR.OF FINANCE ~
CITY MANAGER ~-.~J~'~-'
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Co u n cil/Cityxl~a n a g.~r_._r~
Gary Thorn hill~e~t~;~ an ager
January 22, 2002
Agreement for Consulting Services between the City of Temecula and Sandra
Massa-Lavitt
PREPARED BY:
Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Contract with Sandra Massa-Lavitt for consulting services for
$25,000 for a total contract amount of $50,000 for the fiscal year 2001-02.
BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted the Growth Management Action Plan on March 21,
2000. One of the action items of the plan was to hire a project consultant to represent the City of
Temecula's interest regarding several facets of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP).
Sandra Massa-Lavitt was retained to provide these services to the City of Temecula on a part time
basis. She has experience working for several Riverside County jurisdictions at the Planning
Director level and is familiar with many of the governmental staff members within western Riverside
County. Sandra has been representing the City at the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC)
workshops and attending the transportation (CETAP) meetings as well.
The RCIP continues to have regular meetings with each of its standing committees. The appointed
member to the GPAC is Jeff Comerchero. For the CETAP standing committee, Ron Roberts,
appointed to represent RCTC, also represents Temecula's interests. There are continuing meetings
by various sub-committees of both the GPAC and the CETAP. Temecula's staff representative,
Sandra Massa-Lavitt prepares meeting notes for GPAC/CETAP regular meetings, and updates Gary
Thornhill, Deputy City Manager on cogent issues.
GPAC: As the staff representative for Temecula, the GPAC has accepted Sandra Massa-Lavitt as
the alternate. The G PAC is meeting on a weekly basis to review the 19 area plans that are the land
use element of the General Plan. The GPAC is now comprised of a core group, and Temecula is
represented at all meetings. This was especially important when the Southwest Area Plan was
reviewed by the GPAC. Staff participation in the review of the Southwest Area Plan was
instrumental in decreasing the size and scope of the Community Center located at Murrieta Hot
Springs Road and Winchester.
R:\browNS~amendment 2002 to sm-I contract cc rept.doc
1
For example, rural separators is a concept to preserve open space corridors between more intense
land uses. This concept is in jeopardy by efforts of the BIA representatives. They have presented
specific properties for reconsideration for density intensification on properties within the rural
separators.
Sandra Massa-Lavitt has taken the initiative and presented cogent rationale strongly opposing this
encroachment into the rural separators. This position has been taken at both GPAC and at bi-weekly
Steering Committee meetings. Sandra has also had individual discussions with BIA and Farm
Bureau members on the committee. Because of Temecula's active participation in the GPAC,
presenting Temecula's viewpoint was accepted without adversarial confrontations.
Steering Committee: This group meets bi-weekly with Sandra participating in each meeting.
Usually items of procedure and process are discussed, and decisions made on how to present
issues to the greater GPAC. Temecula is not an appointed member to the Steering Committee
which means we cannot vote, however, again because we are viewed as a very active and
interested City, Sandra is allowed to participate as a non-voting member.
Incentives/Community Center Concept: Sometime last year, the incentive program was
presented to the GPAC (Planning Directors, and more recently, City Managers) which would allow
for up to a 100% increase in density provided that infrastructure was sized properly, land preserved
and funds (amount to be determined) deposited for open space acquisition. The Incentive Program
was intended for Community Centers only. The BIA indicates that it wants to expand the incentives
into other areas that are not designated as Community Centers, Sandra has questioned this
expansion and will continue to express the City's strong concern to the larger GPAC.
CETAP: Sandra represents Temecula in ail sub-committee meetings for CETAP, Transit Oasis
sub-committee and Transit Strategic planning sub-committee. The Transit Oasis concept is a strong
element in the Community Centers planned for the Land Use Element.
Meetings: Temecula is the ONLY city represented at the regular and sub-committee meetings.
There are a total of 6 to 9 meetings a month for GPAC and CETAP. Now that the project is getting
closer to its conclusion, the meetings schedule will intensify.
The original contract for $25,000 approved by the City Manager is nearly depleted and an
amendment is necessary to insure funding for continued attendance at the various RCIP
proceedings. No change in the hourly rate is being proposed. Contracts with a cumulative value in
excess of $25,000 must be approved by the City Council. Accordingly, this contract amendment of
$25, 000 for a total contract amount of $50,000 is brought forward for Council consideration.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Position funded in 2001-2002 FY budget under
Account No. 001-161-999-5248, RCIP Consultant Assistance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract Dated January 1, 2002
R:\browNS~amendrnent 2002 to sm-I contract cc rept.doc
2
CONTRACT DATED
JANUARY 1, 2002
R:\browNS~amendment 2002 to sm-I contract cc rept,doc
3
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
(SANDRA MASSA-LAVI'I-r)
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of January 1,2002, between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Sandra Massa-Lavitt, ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2002, and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
June 31, 2002, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the pro~sions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit A, Payment Rates and Schedule,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit A other than the payment rates and
schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand
Dollars and No Cents ($25,000.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is
approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
R:\BROWNS\R C I P\Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc
1
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease ali
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates
a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant v~ll submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its
designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and
audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of
three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and
may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make
R:\BROWNS\R C I P\Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc
available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software
and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer ties.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to hold harmless the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses,
defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or
nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to properly arising out of
Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the
performance or non-performance of this Agreement.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatNes, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liabilityform
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to
the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injuryand propertydamage. If Commercial General Liability
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either
the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
projectJlocation or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability:. $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
R:\BROWNS\R C I P\Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc
3
(3)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a
bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Previsions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the bllowing previsions:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, ils officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
Any failure to comply with reporting or other previsions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to complywith these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
R:\BROWNS~R C I P\Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc
4
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements electing the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's e>clusive direction and control. Neither Citynor anyof its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are
in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt, obligation or liabilitywhatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure
of the Consultant to complywith this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without wdtten
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to
review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review
any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
R:~BROWNS'~R C I P\Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
To Consultant:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
Sandra Massa-Lavitt
74040 Old Prospector Trail
Palm Desert, CA 92260
(760) 340-2990
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without pdor wdften consent of the
City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement,
only Sandra Massa-Lavitt shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Sandra Massa-
Lavitt may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this
Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice pdor to the departure of Sandra
Massa-Lavitt from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the City shall
have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said
notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be
otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation ofthis Agreement. Anylitigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief
granted.
17. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula
shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the
Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year
thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of
the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise,
in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this
project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered
whether or not such interest is prohibited bylaw or this Agreement.
R:\BROWNS\R C I P~Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc 6
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All pdor or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or wdtten, are
merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set fodh herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
CityClerk
R:~ROWNS'~R C I P~Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc
7
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
By:.
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
R:\BROWNS\R C I P~Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
And
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
The contractual services shall be limited to attendance at formal and informal meetings related to
the Riverside County Integrated Plan process in any of several venues; research of related materials
or historical data; preparation of reports and summaries of meetings; attendance and oral
presentations at Temecula City Council meetings; all of the preceding as required bythe Community
Development Department as directed bythe Deputy City Manager.
Hourly rate shall be $70.00 per hour plus any direct expenses incurred by research with other
agencies.
Any change in scope requinng auto insurance or Errors & Omissions Insurance coverage shall
require amendments to the basic agreement.
R:\BROWNS\R C I P\Sandra Massa-Lavitt Contract Jan 22, 2002.doc
ITEM 12
APPROVAL
ClTY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER ~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
.City ManagedCity Council
John Meyer, Redevelopment Director~
January 22, 2002
Proposed Amendment to RDA Pass-Through Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
"AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
REIMBURSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX INCREMENT
FUNDS FROM THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT"
BACKGROUND: In June of 1988, the County Board of Supervisors for Riverside County
adopted Ordinance 658 approving the Temecula Redevelopment Plan. Shortly thereafter, Robert
Dawes and Save Historic Temecula, an unincorporated association filed a lawsuit objecting to the
formation of the plan. Subsequently, the City of Temecula incorporated and determined it was in its
best interest to take over the Redevelopment Plan as a City/Agency Plan. In June of 1991, a
Stipulated Judgment was reached between all parties and the Redevelopment Area/Agency was
declared valid.
As is common when redevelopment areas are formed, a pass-through agreement was established
to determine the manner in which all affected local taxing agencies would share in the distribution of
tax increment from the City's Redevelopment Project Area. These local taxing agencies include
Riverside County, Temecula RDA, local school district and special districts. Each agency receives a
set percentage of the tax increment. The percentage remains fixed but the allocation increases or
decreases as assessed property values increase or decrease. In California, property values are
assessed at one (1) percent of the sales price of the property. Therefore, valuation increases only if
a property is sold or improvements such as new construction or additions are made to the property.
The terms of our Agency's Agreement with the County provides the County a fixed amount of
increment each year in the amount of approximately $860,724. The balance deferred remains with
the City. Over time, the allocations would shift with the City receiving a guaranteed minimum of $2.5
R:~,DA PASS THROUGH~RDA Pass Through Council Report.doc
million and the balance going to the County to pay back the deferral with interest.
This arrangement was seen as advantageous because it "front loaded" the City with tax increment
thereby increasing its ability to sell bonds and raise capital to carry out redevelopment activities.
Unfortunately, neither the County nor the City anticipated the recession would result in decreased
property values. This decrease in revenue stream significantly impacted the process of paying back
the County deferral.
DISCUSSION: The terms of the agreement are complicated and difficult to administer. To
resolve this, staff from the City and the County agreed to amend the agreement in order for both
parties to better obtain the benefits of the redevelopment project. The City and County staffs have
formulated the following deal points:
1. Twenty Percent (20%) housing fund would be allocated from the gross increment -
consistent with California Redevelopment Law.
2. Agency provides $6 million payout to County and applies the $545,000 administration fee
to resolve the outstanding deferral.
3. County Agrees to reducing pass-through pementage from approximately 29% to 25%.
4. Agency will start paying administrative fee estimated at approximately $130,000 per year.
The Agency/City would contribute approximately $5 million dollars towards the acquisition of
right-of-way for the Date/Cherry interchange. Both City and County staff agree this is a
regionally significant public improvement. The contribution would allowthe Countyto remain
financially whole between the existing pass-through percentage and the proposed pass-
through percentage.
ANALYSIS: Staff believes this agreement will provide significant benefits to the Agency. By
paying the $6 million to the County, and forgoing the $545,000 administration fee, the City is making
a substantial up front payment to the County, with the balance to be paid over time through the
County administration fee. The reduction in the pass-through rate from 29% to 25% will offer the
Agency the ability to sell a second series of bonds. In addition, this amendment removes the cap on
net increment available to the Agency.
This amendment would stop the on-going accumulation of debt that could reach nearly $100 million
by the end of the life of the RDA in 2028. The amendment would establish a simpler formula for
projecting future revenue for both Agency and County and provide incentive to the Agency to pursue
redevelopment activities, resulting in higher future incrementJpass-through.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that a second series of bonds coupled with the refinancing
of the existing bonds would generate sufficient funding to cover the $6 million payout to the
County. The $5 million for the Date/Cherry intemhange is currently funded within the 2002-2006
Capital Improvement Program Budget
Attachments: RDA Pass Through Agreement
Resolution No.- 2002
R:W, DA PASS THROUGHW, DA Pass Through Council Report.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECU LA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
"AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
REIMBURSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX INCREMENT
FUNDS FROM THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines and declares
that:
A. On July 12, 1988, the County, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula,
duly adopted Ordinance No. 658 enacting a redevelopment plan, known as the "County of Riverside
Redevelopment Plan 1-1988" (the "Plan").
B. The City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989 and all of the
territory to which the Plan applies (the "Project Area") is now included within the corporate
boundaries of the City of Temecula.
C. On April 9, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council")
duly adopted Ordinance No. 91-14 activating the Agency and designating the City Council of the City
of Temecula to be the members of the Agency and Ordinance No. 91-15 adopting a redevelopment
plan, which ordinance had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan
from the County and the County Agency to the City and the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33215(a).
D. On April 9, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-38 which
resolution bound the City to reimburse the County's costs of transferring the Plan to the City
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33215(b).
E. The parties hereby acknowledge that the Agency has paid the County the
costs incurred by the County in transferring the Plan to the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33215(b) and the City's Resolution No. 91-38.
F, Following consultations between the Agency and representatives of the
County on behalf of the County General Fund, Structural Fire Protection Fund and Library Fund to
determine the fiscal impact of the Plan upon them, the County, the County Agency, CORAL, the City
and the Agency entered into an agreement entitled "Agreement Between the County of Riverside,
the Redevelopment Agency of the County of Riverside, County of Riverside Asset Leasing
Corporation, the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for
Reimbursement and Distribution of Tax Increment Funds from the Temecula Redevelopment
Project" dated as of May 14, 1991 (the "Agreement"),
R:hRDA PASS THROUGH~Tem City Res Approving Pass Through. DOC
G. The Agreement was entered into to address the financial detriment caused by
the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan from the County and the County Agency to the City and the
Agency and was entered into pursuant to the authority of Health and Safety Code Sections 33215(e)
and 33401.
H. The Agency has consulted with representatives of the County and the County
Agency and has determined that there is a continued fiscal impact on the County and the County
Agency from the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan from the County and County Agency to the City
and the Agency.
I. The County, the County Agency, CORAL, the City and the Agency desire to
amend and restate the Agreement to assist the Agency in financing the Project Area, to address the
continued fiscal impact of the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan and to amicably resolve any
differences regarding the interpretation of the Agreement.
J. By approval of this Agreement, the parties hereto find and determine that
any financial effects relating to the Plan are alleviated by the terms of this Amended and Restated
Agreement.
K. The County, CORAL, and County Agency each agree and acknowledge that
the Agency and City are relying upon the representations and warranties of County, CORAL and
County Agency with respect to the matters set forth herein and particularly Section 8.
L. This Amended and Restated Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of
all parties to finance and carry out their statutory purposes and is intended to be a contract within the
meaning of Government Code Section 53511.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves in substantial
conformance that certain agreement entitled "Amended and Restated Agreement Between the
County of Riverside, the Redevelopment Agency of the County of Riverside, County of Riverside
Asset Leasing Corporation, the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula for Reimbursement and Distribution of Tax Increment Funds from the Temecula
Redevelopment Project, with such changes in each document as may be mutually agreed upon by
the parties and the City Manager as are in substantial conformance with the form of such Agreement
which on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the
Agreement, including related exhibits and attachments on behalf of the City. A copy of the final
Agreement when executed by the Mayor shall be placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
Section 3. The City Manager (or his designee), is hereby authorized, on behalf of the
City, to take all actions necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement the Agreement and to
administer the City's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be performed under the Agreement
and related documents.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:~RDA PASS THROUGHXTem City Res Approving Pass Through. DOC
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22
day of January, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SS
I, Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15 day of January 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:W. DA PASS THROUGHXTcm City Res Approving Pass Through. DOC
AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE COUNTY
OF RIVERSIDE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY
OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
REIMBURSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS
FROM THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT (the "Amended and Restated
Agreement") is made and entered into this 22 day of January 2002, by and between the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ("Agency"), CITY OF TEMECULA
("City"), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ("County") and THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ("County Agency"). In consideration of their mutual promises and
covenants and the facts set forth herein, the parties do hereby agree as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. This Amended and Restated Agreement is made with respect
to the following facts and for the following purposes, which the parties hereto acknowledge as true
and correct:
A. On July 12, 1988, the County, prior to the incorporation of the City of
Temecula, duly adopted Ordinance No. 658 enacting a redevelopment plan, known as the "County
of Riverside Redevelopment Plan 1-1988" (the "Plan").
B. The City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989 and all of the
territory to which the Plan applies (the "Project Area") is now included within the corporate
boundaries of the City of Temecula.
C. On April 9, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council")
duly adopted Ordinance No. 91-14 activating the Agency and designating the City Council of the City
of Temecula to be the members of the Agency and Ordinance No. 91-15 adopting a redevelopment
plan, which ordinance had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan
from the County and the County Agency to the City and the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33215(a).
D. On April 9, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-38 which
resolution bound the City to reimburse the County's costs of transferring the Plan to the City
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33215(b).
E. The parties hereby acknowledge that the Agency has paid the County the
costs incurred by the County in transferring the Plan to the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33215(b) and the City's Resolution No. 91-38.
F. Following consultations between the Agency and representatives of the
County on behalf of the County General Fund, Structural Fire Protection Fund and Library Fund to
determine the fiscal impact of the Plan upon them, the County, the County Agency, County of
Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation (ACORAL), the City and the Agency entered into an
agreement entitled "Agreement Between the County of Riverside, the Redevelopment Agency of the
County of Riverside, County of Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation, the City of Temecula and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for Reimbursement and Distribution of Tax
Increment Funds from the Temecula Redevelopment Project" dated as of May 14, 1991 (the
"Agreement").
R:~RDA PASS THROUGH~PassThroughAmendmentchg2
G. The Agreement was entered into to address the financial detriment caused by
the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan from the County and the County Agency to the City and the
Agency and was entered into pursuant to the authority of Health and Safety Code Sections 33215(e)
and 33401.
H. The Agency has consulted with representatives of the County and the County
Agency and has determined that there is a continued fiscal impact on the County and the County
Agency from the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan from the County and County Agency lo the City
and the Agency.
I. The County, the County Agency, the City and the Agency desire to amend
and restate the Agreement to assist the Agency in financing the Project Area, to address the
continued fiscal impact of the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan and to amicably resolve any
differences regarding the interpretation of the Agreement.
J. By approval of this Amended and Restated Agreement, the parties hereto find
and determine that any financial effects relating to the Plan are alleviated by the terms of this
Amended and Restated Agreement.
K. The County and County Agency each agree and acknowledge that the
Agency and City are relying upon the representations and warranties of County and County Agency
with respect to the matters set forth herein and particularly Section 8.
L. This Amended and Restated Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of
all parties to finance and carry out their statutory purposes and is intended to be a contract within the
meaning of Government Code Section 53511.
M. Pursuant to Section 10 of the Agreement, that certain agreement entitled A
Reimbursement Agreement by and between the County Agency and CORAL, dated April 23, 1991
was terminated as to the Plan and is of no further force and effect, and, therefore, the County and
County Agency have determined that this Amended and Restated Agreement has no impact on
CORAL.
SECTION 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this Amended and Restated
Agreement, the following terms shall be defined as follows:
A. Assessment Roll. "Assessment Roll" shall mean the 1988-89 assessment
roll, which is the last roll equalized prior to the effective date of Riverside County Ordinance No. 658
adopting the Plan, and which shall be utilized as the base year assessment roll for allocation of
taxes for the Project Area pursuant to Section 33670 of the California Health and Safety Code.
B. Tax Increment Revenue. "Tax Increment Revenue" shall mean that portion of
ad valorem property taxes resulting from the increase in assessed valuation in the Project Area over
the base year assessed valuation in the Project Area as defined in Section 33670 of the Health and
Safety Code. Tax Increment Revenue shall mean only those taxes collected as a result of the one
pement levy allowed under Article XIIIA of the Constitution of the State of California and shall not
include those taxes levied in excess of the one percent levy.
C. Adjusted Tax Increment Revenue. "Adjusted Tax Increment Revenue" shall
mean Tax Increment Revenue less amounts retained by the County as the annual property tax
administrative charge.
11087~0001\671367.6
-2-
D. County Share. "County's Share" shall mean 18.12 percent of the Adjusted
Tax Increment Revenue.
E. County Structural Fire Department Share. "County Structural Fire Department
Share" shall mean 4.70 percent of the Adjusted Tax Increment Revenue,
F. County Library Department Share, "County Library Department Share" shall
mean 2.18 percent of the Adjusted Tax Increment Revenue.
G. Pass-through Increment. A Pass-through Increment shall mean the amount of
tax increment revenue for each taxing entity to be allocated at the respective percentages
authorized by this Agreement or by the agreements referenced in Section 8.
SECTION 3. Allocation of Tax Increment Revenue. Beginning in fiscal year 2001-
02, the Tax Increment Revenue shall be allocated to the taxing entities and distributed by the
Riverside County Auditor-Controller as follows:
A. The County shall retain the County's annual property tax administrative
charge. Such charge is estimated to be approximately $130,000 per year.
B, After disbursement of the amount in paragraph A, the Auditor-Controller shall
disburse to each affected taxing entity the amount of Pass-through Increment calculated based on
the approved percentages pursuant to this Agreement and the agreements referenced in Section 8.
The applicable percentages restated are included in this Agreement as Exhibit 1.
· C. After disbursement of the annual property tax administrative charge and the
Pass-through Increment, the Auditor-Controller shall disburse all remaining Adjusted Tax Increment
Revenue to the Agency.
D. The Agency will be responsible for the deposit of Tax Increment Revenue to
the Agency's Iow and moderate income housing fund.
SECTION 4. Prior Property Tax Administrative Charges. The Parties hereby
acknowledge that notwithstanding Section 13 (c) of the Agreement, the County has previously
charged the Agency $545,000 for property tax administration for past years and has withheld such
amount from the distribution of Tax Increment Revenue to the Agency under the Agreement.
Pursuant to this Section 4, the parties hereby agree that the County will retain such sum of $545,000
as repayment of any amounts deferred under the Agreement. The County hereby acknowledges
that the County is not owed any moneys from the Agency for property tax administration with respect
to the Project Area for years prior to fiscal year 2001-02.
SECTION 5. Payment of $6~000,000. The Agency hereby agrees to pay the County
the sum of $6,000,000 within 90 days after the Agency issues tax allocation bonds in an amount
sufficient to net the sum of $6,000,000 after the payment of incidental expenses, but in no event
later than one year after the execution of this Amended and Restated Agreement by the Agency as
repayment of any amounts deferred under the Agreement. The County agrees to expend such
funds, and the interest on such funds, pending that expenditure, in a manner determined by the
Agency's bond counsel so as to allow the interest on the tax allocation bonds to be excluded from
the gross incomes of the owners of the bonds.
11087~0001\671367.6
-3-
SECTION 6. $5~000~000 Contribution Towards Acquisition of RiRht-of-Way for
the Date/Cherry Interchange.
The Agency hereby agrees to contribute approximately $5,000,000 towards the
acquisition of right-of-way for the Date/Cherry Interchange and to complete the acquisition of such
right-of-way within five years after the execution of this Amended and Restated Agreement. The
parties hereby agree that the Date/Cherry Interchange is a regionally significant public improvement
and that the Agency's contribution as provided for in this Section 6 is for purposes of repayment by
the Agency of any amounts deferred under the Agreement. If the Agency does not complete the
acquisition of the right-of-way for the Date/Cherry Interchange within five years after the execution of
this Amended and Restated Agreement, the Agency and County will jointly select an alternative
regionally significant public improvement with an impact on the City of Temecula and the Agency will
contribute approximately $5,000,000 towards the cost of completing such alternative regionally
significant public improvement pursuant to a time schedule mutually agreeable to the Agency and
County. The parties hereby agree that the Agency's contribution toward an alternative regionally
significant public improvement as provided for in the preceding sentence of this Section 6 is for the
purposes of repayment by the Agency of any amounts deferred under the Agreement.
SECTION 7. Use of Tax Increment Revenue for County Fire and County Library
Services.
A. County agrees that the County Structural Fire Department Share and County
Library Department Share shall be used only for payment of expenses for fire protection and library
services respectively within the City of Temecula. Should County cease to provide these services
within the City, Department County shall remit said County Structural Fire Department Share Fire
and County Library Share to the City.
B. Monies allocated by this Amended and Restated Agreement to the County
representing the County Structural Fire Department Share will be considered as local fire tax
revenue raised within the City of Temecula for the purpose of computing additional fire protection
services contract charges above the base level of services and fire tax revenue received, if the City
desires to contract for enhanced fire protection service levels.
SECTION 8. Debts and Obliflations in Connection With the Plan. The County
and the County Agency warrant and represent to Agency that the following are the only bonds, debts
or other obligations, financial or otherwise, written or oral, incurred by County or the County Agency
relating to the Plan during the time the County Agency administered the Plan:
A. "Cooperation Agreement Between The Mt. San Jacinto Community College
District, The County of Riverside and The Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside",
dated August 23, 1988; and
B. "Cooperation Agreement Between the Temecula Public Cemetery District,
The County of Riverside and The Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside", dated
August 1, 1988;
C. "Cooperation Agreement Between Temecula Valley Unified School District,
the County of Riverside and the Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside", dated April 17,
1991;
D. "Cooperation Agreement Between the County Service Area No. 75, the
County of Riverside and the Redevelopment Agency For the County of Riverside", dated August 4,
1988;
11087~0001\671367.6
-4-
E. "Cooperation Agreement Between the Eastern Municipal Water District, the
County of Riverside and the Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside", dated October 3,
1988;
F. "Cooperation Agreement Between the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District, the County of Riverside and the Redevelopment Agency For the
County of Riverside", dated November 1, 1988;
G. The Stipulated Judgment in Dawes, et al. v. The Redevelopment A.qency of
the County of Riverside (Riverside Superior Court Case Nos. 194488MF, 194968); and
H. "Reimbursement Agreement" between the Redevelopment Agency of County
of Riverside and the County of Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation ("CORAL"), dated April 23,
1991.
SECTION 9. Termination of CORAL ARreement. The parties acknowledge that
the agreement entitled "Reimbursement Agreement" by and between the County Agency and the
County of Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation ("CORAL") dated April 23, 1991 has heretofore been
terminated as to the Plan and is of no further force and effect.
SECTION 10. Repayment of Deferred Amounts. The parties hereby acknowledge
and agree that the payments provided for in this Amended and Restated Agreement satisfy and
discharge the Agency's obligation to repay any deferred amounts under the Agreement. The County
hereby releases the Agency from any obligation to make any payments under the Agreement,
including the repayment of any deferred amounts.
SECTION 11. Amendment of the Plan. The County and the County Agency agree
not to repeal, dissolve or otherwise modify the Plan.
SECTION 12. Amendments. This Amended and Restated Agreement may not be
amended, modified or altered without the express written consent of the parties.
SECTION 13..Administration. The County Auditor-Controller shall annually determine
the following:
A. The total amount of Tax Increment Revenue generated by the Plan; and
B. The total amount of Tax Increment Revenue that will be allocated to the
Agency and the taxing entities based on the distribution established by this Amended and Restated
Agreement.
SECTION 14. Review and Audit. All parties shall make their books and records
regarding the Project Area and calculation of Tax Increment Revenue and distribution available to
the other parties for review within thirty (30) days of receiving written notification requesting to review
said records. The County Auditor-Controller shall carefully, fully and in accordance with generally
accepted government accounting practices document all information and calculations supporting the
distributions required by this Amended and Restated Agreement and shall make such information
and documentation available to the Agency.
SECTION 15. Term of A,qreement. The effective date of this Amended and
Restated Agreement shall be the date of approval by the appropriate governing body of the last of
11087~0001\671367.6
-5-
the parties to approve this Amended and Restated Agreement and, unless previously terminated by
mutual written agreement of the parties, all rights and obligations in this Amended and Restated
Agreement shall terminate when the Agency's legal right to claim and receive Tax Increment
Revenue from the Project Area shall cease.
SECTION 16. A.qreement Not to Litigate. The County, County Agency, City and
Agency each hereby waive against and between each other any and all causes of action, cases,
claims, accounts, actions or complaints relating to, and agree not to challenge the validity of the
Plan or the actions of City described in Section 1, or the validity, on the grounds of the invalidity of
the Plan or the City actions described in Section 1, of bonds to finance or refinance in whole or in
part the Plan, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the legality and validity of all
proceedings heretofore taken for or in any way connected with the designation of the survey area,
the selection of the Project Area, the formation of the Preliminary Plan, the adoption of the Plan, and
the transfer of the Plan pursuant to the City actions described in Section 1 and also including the
legality and validity of all proceedings undertaken in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for
the Plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Further, the parties find and
determine that any financial effects described in former Health and Safety Code Sections 33012 and
33401 relating to the Plan, are alleviated by approval of this Amended and Restated Agreement. In
recognition thereof, the County and County Agency, except for the obligations set forth in this
Amended and Restated Agreement, forever release, discharge, and acquit the Agency and the City
from any and all sums of money, claims, contentions, allegations, demands, accounts, actions and
causes of any matter, fact, transaction or occurrence whatsoever, whether known or unknown,
suspected or unsuspected, relating to or arising out of any and all matters referred to the Agreement
or in this Amended and Restated Agreement or the Plan. It is understood and agreed that the
foregoing release extends to all claims of every nature and kind whatsoever, known or unknown,
suspected er unsuspected that the District now has or could have asserted relative to the matters
herein described, and all rights under California Civil Code Section 1542 are hereby expressly
waived. Said Section reads as follows:
"A general release does not extend to claims which the
creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of
executing the release, which if known by him must have materially
affected his settlement with the debtor."
SECTION 17. Severability. If any provision, term, covenant or condition of this
Amended and Restated Agreement is held invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this
Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered
impracticable to enforce.
SECTION 18. Inte,qration. ThisAmended and Restated Agreement constitutes the
entire, complete and final expression of agreement between the parties. This Amended and
Restated Agreement supersedes and replaces the Agreement which is hereby rescinded. For
purposes of any changes to the allocations of Tax Increment Revenues for the Project Area as set
forth under the Agreement, any changes caused by this Amended and Restated Agreement shall be
made effective July 1, 2001, and shall be reflected in the fiscal year 2001-2002 tax allocations.
11087~0001~671367.6
-6-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed on their behalf by their duly authorized representatives.
COUNTY Of RIVERSIDE
By: ¸
Chairman of the Board
of Supervisors
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman of the Board
ATTEST TO:
Executive Officer-Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
County Counsel
By:
Deputy
1 I087~0001\671367,6
-7-
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
ATTEST TO:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney and
Agency Counsel
11087~0001\671367.6
-8-
Exhibit 1 ~
County General 18.12%
County Library 2.18%
County Fire 4.70%
City of Temecula 0%
City of Temecula Inc Dispute 0%
Temecula Unified 29.62%
Mt, San Jacinto Jr. College 29.62%
Riverside Co. Office of Education 29.62%
Riv. Co. Reg Park & Open Space 0%
Flood Control Administration 100%
Flood Control Zone 7 100%
Temecula Public Cemetery 100%
Temecula Zone B 0%
Eastern Muni Water 100%
Eastern Muni Wtr Imp Dist U-8 100%
Western Muni Water 14th Fringe 0%
Rancho California Water 100%
1/ With the exception of the percentages for County General, County Library and County Fire,
all percentages are stated as a percentage of the applicable taxing entity=s share of the tax
increment revenue generated within the Project Area as a result of the one percent levy allowed
under Article XIIIA of the Constitution of the State of California.
11087X0001\671367.6
-9-
ITEM 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ClTY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~L~..~_
C,TY MANAGER
/~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 22, 2002
Maintenance Bond posted by Vulcan Materials Company, Western Division
as security for asphalt concrete pavement for the First Street Extension
Project, PW95-08
PREPARED BY: t~onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
(2~Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
ACCEPT the Maintenance Bond as security for the asphalt concrete pavement placed
for the First Street Extension Project, PW95-08.
BACKGROUND: Riverside Construction Company entered into an agreement with
the City of Temecula for the construction of the First Street Extension Project, PW95-08.
CalMat Co, dba Vulcan Materials Company, Western Division was a subcontractor to Riverside
Construction Company responsible for supplying asphalt concrete pavement for the project.
The asphalt concrete material did not meet the specifications of the construction contract. The
City of Temecula and Vulcan Materials Company have agreed that Vulcan Materials Company
will guarantee the City of Temecula against all defects in workmanship and materials for a
period of three years from the date of the Notice of Completion for the project. In addition,
Vulcan Materials Company has agreed to post a Maintenance Bond guaranteeing against all
defects in workmanship and materials, which may become apparent during a period of three
years from the date of the Notice of Completion for the project. Travelers Casualty and Surety
Company of America posted the Maintenance Bond as follows:
Bond No. 83SB103610799BCM in the amount of $25,000 as security against all defects
in workmanship and materials for asphalt concrete pavement for a three-year period.
FISCALIMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Maintenance Bond
1
R:~agdrpt~002\O122~rnaintenance bond Vulcan materials.pw95-08 first st extension
Surety Bond Review
The attached surety bonds (Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America)
have been reviewed. (Vulcan Materials Company)
Bond # 83SB103610799BCM $25,000
~The surety company is an admitted company in the State of California
[--~The admitted company was verified at
www. insurance.ca.gov/docs/fs/admitted.htm
liThe surety company is not an admitted company in the State of California
Surety bond reference is A.M. Best 2001 version 071400 (A+:FSC X)
Verified by:
Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
BOND NO.: 83SB103610799BCM
PREMIUM: $188.00
MAINTENANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we CalMat Co, dba Vulcan Materials
Company, Western Division, as Principal, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of
America, a corporation organized, existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut and duly
licensed to do business in the State of California, as Surety, arc held and firmly bound unto the City of
Temecula, as Obligee in the penal sum of Twenty Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars.
..... ($25,000.00) to which payment well and truly to be made we do bind ourselves, our and each of
our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
WHEREAS, Riverside Construction Company entered into an agreement with the Obligee, City of
Temecula, for the construction of the First Street Bridge, Project No. PW95-08, First Street
Extension ("Project"). Principal, Vulcan Materials, entered into a subcontract with Riverside
Construction Co. for furnishing asphalt concrete paving for the Project. The asphalt concrete paving
material placed by Riverside Construction did not meet the contract specifications as specified in the
said construction contract. Obligee, City of Temecula, and Principal, Vulcan Materials, agree that
Principal will guarantee Obligee against all defects in workmanship and materials which may be
verified by surface raveling, cracking (both transverse and longitudinal) shoving, subsidence, rutting or
other detrimental conditions during for a period of three years from the date of the Notice of
Completion for the Project.
WHEREAS, said agreement also provides that the Principal shall furnish a bond conditioned to
guarantee for a period of Three year(s) after the date of the Notice of Completion on said Project, by
the owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said
period.
WHEREAS, the said Project has been completed and accepted by the Obligee, City of Temecula and
the date of the Notice of Completion for the Project is
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that, If the
Principal shall indemnify the Obligee for all loss that the Obligee may sustain by reason of any
defective materials or workmanship which will become apparent during the period of Three year(s)
from and after completion of the work and acceptance by the Obligee then this obligation shall be void,
otherwise to remain in full force and effect.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED
July 30, 2001
CalMat Co., Vulcan Materials Company, Western
Name:
Title: t/.
Travele/r~suaity and Surety Company of
Betty Wall~e-r, Attorney In Fact
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY
Hartford, Connecticut 06183-9062
POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S)-IN-FACT
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY TIIESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF
AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY,
corporations duly organized under tho laws of the State of Connecticut, and having their principal offices in the City of Hartford,
County' of'-Harfford, State of Connecticut,' (hereinafter tho "Companies") hath made, constituted and appointed, and do by these
presents make, constitute and appoint: lil. S. Albrecht, Jr., Saundra L. Gingras, Willlam A. Sadler, Lisa L Thornton, C. K.
Nakamura, Maria Penn, Harriet Lambell, Tracy Aston, Betty Walker, of Los Angeles, California, their fmc and lawful
Attorncy(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, execute and acknowledge, at any place within thc United
States, the following instrument(s): by his/her sole signature and act, any and all bonds, rccognizanccs, contracts of indcmnity, and
other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking and any and all consents incident thcrcto
and to bind the Companics, thereby as fully and to thc same extcnt as if the same were signed by the duly authorized officers of thc
Companies, and all thc acts of said Attorney(s)-in-Fact, pursuant to thc authority herein given, are hereby ratified and confirmed,
This appointment is made undcr and by authority of the following Standing Resolutions of said Companies, which Resolutions arc
now in full force and effect:
VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chalrm~n, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any
Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secreta.9' may appoint Atlomeys-in-Fact
and Agents to act for and on behalf of the company and may give such appolntce such authority az his or her certificate of authority may prescribe
to sign with the Company's nnme and seal with thc Company's seal bends, recognizances, conlxaclz of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in
the nature of a bend, recognizance, or conditional andcrtaking, and any of said officers or the Board of Directors at any time may rcmovc any such
appointee and revoke tho power given him or her.
VOTED: That the Chnh'man, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President' any Senior Vice President or any Vice Prcsidcn{
may delegate all or any part of the foregoing authority to onc or more officers or employces of this Company, provided that each such dclcgntion is
in writing and a copy thcreof is filed in the office of the Sccretnry, ;." . ~
VOTED: That any bend, recognizance, conU'act of indcm~.i7, or' writing 0bllgntory in the nature of n bend, recognizance, or conditional
undcrtnking shall be valid and binding upon thc Company whcn (a) signed b7 thc Presidcnt' any Vice Chairman, any Exccutivc Vice Presidcnt, any
Seninr Vice President or any Vice President' nay Second Vice Presidant, thc Trcazurcr, any Assistant Transurcr, the Corporate Secretary or any
Assistant Sccrctary and duly attested nad sanlcd with thc Company's seal by a Secretary or Assistant Sccrctary, or (b) duly cx~utcd (under seal, if
required) by one or more ^ttomeys-in-Fact and Agents pursuant to thc power prescribed in his or her certilicatc or thcir certificates of authority or
by anc or more Company officers pursuant to a writtan dclegntion of anthority.
This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following
Standing Resolution voted by the Boards of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF
AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, which
Resolution is now in full force and effect:
VOTED: That the signature of each of the following officers: President' any Executive Vice President' any Senior Vice President, any Vice
Presidant' any Assistant Vice President, any Secrei~ry, any Assistant. Secretary, nad the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any
power of attorney or to any cea. ificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys-in-Fact for
purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such power of attorney
or certificate boating such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid nad binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and
certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bend or
undertaking to which it is attached.
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Los Angeles
On July 30, 2001 before me, Edward C. Spector, Notary Public,
personally appeared Betty Walker personally known to me (or proved to
me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose
name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Edward C. Spector
ITEM 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE'~I
CITY MANAGER
~j~'~/illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 22, 2002
Substitute Agreements and Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract Map
No. 23143-7 (East of Butterfield Stage Road and Crowne Hill Drive, South
of Pauba Road, and North of Old Kent Road)
PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
(~lement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Per[ormance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and labor
and materials for Tract Map 23143-7.
ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond
as security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-7.
ACKNOWLEDGE that original bonds collected by the original subdivider will be released
once transfer of title ownership to the new subdivider is complete.
4. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On August 14, 2001, the City Council approved Tract Map No.
23143-7, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreements with:
Crowne Meadows, LP
c/o Communities Southwest
181 Old Springs Road
Anaheim, CA 92808
for the purpose of securing the improvements and monumentation within Tract Map 23143-7.
Accompanying the agreements were the following bonds posted by American Motorists
insurance Company:
Bond No. 3SM96425300 in the amount of $1,140,000 as security for subdivision
improvements.
Bond No. 3SM96425300 in the amount of $570,000 as security for labor and materials.
1
R;~agdrpt~O02\0122\tm 23143-7.sub bond & agmt
Bond No. 3SM96425400 in the amount of $34,375 as security for subdivision
monumentation.
The original subdivider, Crowne Meadows, LP, has decided to sell the land within Tract Map
23143-7 to KB Home Coastal, Inc. Therefore, KB Home Coastal, Inc. has elected to submit
substitute bonds and agreements that will replace the ones on file from the original subdivider
as follows:
KB Home Coastal Inc.
12235 El Camino Real, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92130
Attn: Lisa Gordon
Accompanying the agreements were the following bonds posted by American Casualty
Company of Reading, Pennsylvania:
Bond No. 929 232 821 in the amount of $1,140,000 as security for subdivision
improvements.
Bond No. 929 232 821 in the amount of $570,000 as security for labor and materials.
Bond No. 929 232 822 in the amount of $34,375 as security for subdivision
monumentation.
The sale is in process and Crowne Meadows, LP is the current owner. The release of the
original bonds posted by Crowne Meadows, LP will follow with a separate staff report once the
sale is complete and KB Home Coastal, Inc. submits proof of ownership.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2
R:~agdrpt~2002\0122\tm 23143-7.sub bond & agmt
TRACT NO. 2314,3-7
TO SAN DIEGO
OJECT SITE
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
~/~'William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Janua~ 22,2002
Substitute Agreements and Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract Map
No. 23143-9 (East of Butterfield Stage Road, South of Royal Crest Place,
and West of Crowne Hill Drive)
PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
(~ Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for improvements and labor
and materials for Tract Map 23143-9.
ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Monument Agreement and Subdivision Monument Bond
as security for monumentation for Tract Map 23143-9.
ACKNOWLEDGE that original bonds collected by the original subdivider will be released
once transfer of title ownership to the new subdivider is complete.
4. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On August 14, 2001, the City Council approved Tract Map No.
23143-9, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreements with:
Crowne Meadows, LP
~o Communities Southwest
181 Old Springs Road
Anaheim, CA 92808
for the purpose of securing the improvements and monumentation within Tract Map 23143-9.
Accompanying the agreements were the following bonds posted by American Motorists
Insurance Company:
Bond No. 3SM96425700 in the amount of $1,550,500 as security for subdivision
improvements.
Bond No. 3SM96425700 in the amount of $775,250 as security for labor and materials.
1
R:~agdrpt~002\0122\tm 23143-9.sub bond & agmt
Bond No. 3SM96425800 in the amount of $52,375 as security for subdivision
monumentation.
The original subdivider, Crowne Meadows, LP, has decided to sell the land within Tract Map
23143-9 to KB Home Coastal, Inc. Therefore, KB Home Coastal, Inc. has elected to submit
substitute bonds and agreements that will replace the ones on file from the original subdivider
as follows:
KB Home Coastal Inc.
12235 El Camino Real, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92130
Attn: Lisa Gordon
Accompanying the agreements were the following bonds posted by American Casualty
Company of Reading, Pennsylvania:
Bond No. 929 232 823 in the amount of $1,550,500 as security for subdivision
improvements.
Bond No. 929 232 823 in the amount of $775,250 as security for labor and materials.
Bond No. 929 232 824 in the amount of $52,375 as security for subdivision
monumentation.
The sale is in process and Crowne Meadows, LP is the current owner. The release of the
original bonds posted by Crowne Meadows, LP will follow with a separate staff report once the
sale is complete and KB Home Coastal, Inc. submits proof of ownership.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2
R:\agdrpt~2002\0122\tm 23143-9.sub bond & agmt
TRACT NO. 2,314,3-9
TO SAN DIEGO
~ROJECT
SITE
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 16
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~;~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
~/f/~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 22, 2002
Completion and Acceptance for Pavement Management System (FY2000-
2001) - Project No. PW00-30
PREPARED BY:
d~Greg Butler, Senior Engineer
~ Steven Beswick, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Accept the Pavement Management System (FY2000-2001)-Project No. PW00-30, as complete.
2. File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract.
3. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion,
if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On June 26, 2001, the City Council awarded the contract to McLaughlin
Engineering & Mining for an amount of $2,093,991.32. A decrease in final quantities decreased the
contract amount by $609,922.96, bringing the total cost of the project to $1,484,068.36.
The project is part of the Annual Pavement Management Program that includes rehabilitation of
existing pavement by reconstructing roads throughout the City.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction
retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has
been recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT: The bid price for this project was $2,093,991.32. A decrease in final
quantities decreased the contract amount by $609,922.96, bringing the total cost of the project to
$1,484,068.36. This project was funded through Measure A, AB2928 funds and Capital Project
Reserves in account no. 210-165-655-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit
R:'~AG EN DA REPO RTS~2.C02\012202~W 00-30 ACC EPT,DCC
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CiTY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
92590.
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc.
to perform the following work of improvement:
Pavement Management System (FY2000-2001)
Project No. PW00-30
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the
City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on January 22, 2002. That upon said
contract the Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America was surety for the bond given by the said
company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows:
Pavement Management System (FY2000-2001)
6. The street address of said property is: Citywide Temecula, California
Dated at Temecula, California, this 22nd day of January 2002.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
nd
Dated at Temecula, California, this 22 day of January, 2002.
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
l~'~-2u'l'lf.D IN DUELICAT[
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
~otm f103616349
I'F.,I~2~U~ INCLUDED IN
PIGUzOI~,IANC~ BOND
a
PRDJECT NO. PWO0-30
PA VEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (FY2000-07)
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT:
}~c~AUC]~,]:~ ][t~C~v-~.eING & ~:[]~J.--%lO ZNC.
6,1934 }4A*rN STB. y.~J: ~f107, 'I'~COLA, CA 92590-2701
NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S
COit~ORAIL~ON , hereinafb.:r called Principal, and
(181 i~ wVlether a Corpo~atiofl. PaJ~e~h~o or individual)
TRAVEL~F,S C~SUAL~I~ ~ S1]l~z~z COI4PANY
427.5 ~x~t:uzJ. V*E: SqUAJ~. f700, LA JO1.I.A CA
92037
NAME AND ADDRESS OF SUPIE-r'Y
hereinafter called SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum al
~]GQ) Nll~'l'x--Ol~ DOLLARS and 'i'U.U~fI--'i~O CENTS
($ 2,093~991.32 ) in lawful money 3f the United States, said sum being not ~ess than ten
(10%) ol the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the
Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a
certain Contract with the OWNER. dated the 26TB day of J [IAI.15 .~, 2001. a copy
of which is hereto attached and made a [bart hereof for the Consfructicn of PROJECT NO. PW00-
30, PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (FY2000-01).
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bor~d condilioned to guarantee
for the period of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate or, said job, by the OWNER,
against all Selects In workmanship aha materials which may become apparent clunng said periocl;
and
WHEREAS. 1he said Contract has been completed, and was the final ,;stimate approved on
,2001. '
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year
from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to ~he Contract, the work done
under the terms of said Contract shall di:~r:lose poor workmanship in the execution of said work,
and the carrying out of the terms of said ,.'~ontract, or it shall appear that defective materials were
furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this
instrument shall be void.
As e part of the obligation secured hereb,/and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and
reasonable expenses and fees shall be ir~cluQed, including reasonabl~ attorney's lees incurreo by
the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all Ia be t~xed as costs and
included in any judgment rendered.
The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension ~)f time, alteration, or addition
to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereu:~der, or to the specifications
waive notice of any such change, extansion of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the
Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications.
Signed and sealed this 28'Zli day ol JUt~K ,2001.
(Seal)
(Name}
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
McLAUGIII,IB lINkiNG &
PRINCIPAL~INING
Wa?ae ~e
(Name)
V~ce ~es~de~
(Title)
By:
(Name)
(Title)
MAJNTENANCE BOND M-:~ R:lop'~lec~s'eweo- 3~8~$ 0oc
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Riverside
ss.
On 6/28/01
personally appeared Wayne White
~ COMM. ~1211~ 0
, before me, Carol M. Schlitz, Notary Public
I;fl personally known to me
[] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) islars
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(les), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my h~nd and official seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relj4ng on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond - Pvmt M~;mt 2001
Document Date: 6/28/01
Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name: Wayne White
CI Individual
[~ Corporate Officer-- Title(s): Vice President
O Partner -- [] Limited [] Genera[
[] Attorney in Fact
[] Trustee
D Guardian or Conservator
[] Other.
Signer ls Representing: McLau~hlin Engineering & Mining, Inc.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ SS.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
On 28 JUNE 2001 ,beforeme, NENDY tt. DOl./NS, NOTARY PUBLIC
PERSONALLY APPEARED INGRID ERIKA CROSBY
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(~) whose name~)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl-
edged to me that h~she/.'-~,c7 executed the same in h~/
her,~I,~k authorized capacity(".zz), and that by hit/her/
their signature(~) on the instrument the person(lO, or the
entity upon behalf of which the person(tO acted, executed
the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal//
-~ ~-.. urAHy PUOLIC. CAL~FORN
~ COMMISSION ~ 1213737
~ '~/ ,. ASAN DIEGO COUNTY
This area for Official Notarial 5~al
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENERAL
[] A'FrORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OFPAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
.AMI[ OF PERSONiSi OR ENTI'I~ilE S)
SURETY SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
TRAVELERS CASUALTY A/qD SURETY COMPANY OF AMER ICA
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY
Hartford, Connecticut 06183-9062
POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S)-IN-FACT
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF
AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY,
corporalions duly organized under thc laws of the State of ConnectioR, and having their principal offices in thc City of Hartford,
County of Hartford, State of Connecticut, (hereinaRer the "Companies") hath made, constituted and appointed, and do by these
presents make, constitute and appoint: Brooke Lafrcnz, Ingrid Erlka Crnsby, Larry D. Cogdill, Michael W. Thomas, Wendy H.
Downs, of San Diego, California, their true and lawful Altorney(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign,
execute and acknowledge, at any place within the United States, the following instrument(s): by his/hot sole signature and ac~, any
and all bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or
· conditional undertaking and any and all consents incident thereto and to bind the Companies, Ihercby as fully and to the same extenl
as if the same were signed by the duly authorized officers of tho Companies, and all the acts of said Atmrney(s)-in-Fact, pursuant to
the authority hcrein given, are hereby ratified and confirm~l.
This appointment is made under and by authority of the following Standing Resolutions of said Companies, which Resolutions are
now in full force and effect:
VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any
Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, Ihe Corporate Secrets~ or any Assistant Secretary may appoint Attorneys-in-Fact
end Agents to act for and, un behalf of the company and may give such appointee such authority as his or her ce~ificate of authority may prescribe
to sign with the Company's name and seal with the Company's seal bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in
the nature of o bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking, and any of said officers or the Board of Directors at any time may remove any such
appointee end revoke the power given him or her.
VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, eny Vice Chain~an. any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President or any Vice President
may delegate all or any part of the foregoing authority to one or more officers or employees of this Company, provided that each such delegation is
in writing and a copy thereof is filed in the office of the Secretary.
VOTED: That any bond, recogniTsnce, contract of indemnity, or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond, recogniTanc~ or conditional
undertaking shall ha valid and binding upon the Company when (a) signed by the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any
Senior Vice President or any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasures, the Corporate Secretary or any
Assistant Secretary and duly attested and scaled with the Company's seal by a Secretary or Assistant Secretary, or (b) duly executed (under seal, if
required) by one or more Attorneys-in-Fast and Agents pursuant to the powe~ prescribed in his or her certificate or their certific, ates of authority or
by one or more Company officers pursuant to a written delegntiou of enthority.
This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile (mechanical or printed) under and by
authority of the following Standing Resolution voted by the Boards of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY
COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY
COMPANY, which Resolution is now in full force and effect:
VOTED: That the signutore of each of the following officers: President, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice
President, any Assistant Vice President, any Secretory, any Assistant Secretazy, and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any
power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys-in-Fact for
purposes only of executing end attesting bonds and undertakings m'xd other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such power of attorney
or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid end binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and
certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the fi~ture with respect to any bend or
undertaking to which it is attached,
ClTYOF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PWO~30
PA VEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (FY2000-01)
McLaughlin Engineering
This is to certify that & Mining, Inc. , (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares
to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor,
services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of
the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the
execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula. with regard to the building, erection,
construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW00-30,
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (FY2000-01), situated in the City of Temecula, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Pavement Management Systems, Temecula, CA
PROJECT NO. PW00-30, PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (FY2000-01)
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
t~/2escription Dollar Amount to Dispute
N/A
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code {}7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Date, d: 12/27/01 By:
CONTRACTOR McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc.
Wayne White, Vice President
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R:~p~orojects~ow00-30~Bi~ Doc
ITEM 17
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
~j/~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 22, 2002
Completion and Acceptance for the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station (Grading
& Paving) - Project No. PW01-21
PREPARED BY:
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Accept the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station (Grading & Paving) - Project No. PW01-21, as
complete.
2. File a Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond.
3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion,
if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On October 9, 2001, the City Council awarded the contract to Grade and
Pave the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station site to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining for an amount of
$82,000.00. Minor change orders and contract item overruns brought the total cost of the project to
$84,424.84. Because this contract was for an interim facility no maintenance bond requirements
were included in the contract.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction
retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has
been recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total bid amount for this project was $82,000.00. Minor change orders
and contract item overruns increased the project cost by $2,424.84, bringing the total cost of the
project to $84,424.84. This project was funded by an emergency appropriation from General Fund
Reserves establishing Capitol Imprevement account no. 210-165-739-5804.
A'I-rACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Contractor's Affidavit
I
R:',AGENDA RE PO RTS',2002~012202'~PW01-21ACCEPT.DOC
RECORDING REC~UESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
92590.
The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc.
to perform the following work of improvement:
Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station (92)
Project No. PW01-21
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the
City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on January 22, 2002. That upon said
contract the Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America was surety for the bond given by the said
company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows:
Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station (92), Project No. PW01-21
6. The street address of said property is: 32364 Overland Trail, Temecula, CA 92592
Dated at Temecula, California, this 22nd day of January 2002.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 22nd day of January, 2002.
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
R:~CIP~PRO J ECTS',PW0 I~PW01-21 VR Int. FS~COMPLETN.NOT.dec
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT No. PWOI-21
VAIL RANCH INTERIM FIRE STATION
This is to certify that McLaushlin Engineering & Mining, Inc., (hereinafter the
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all
materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR'S agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's con~ract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW01-
21, VAIL RANCH I]NTERI~I FIRE STATION, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California,
more particularly described as follows:
Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station, Temecula, CA
PROJECT NO. PW01-21, VAIL RANCH INTERIM FIRE STATION
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid
sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract. The CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description Dollar Amount to Dispute
N/A N/A
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code S7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the
city of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims,
debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated: 12/27/01 By:
CONTRACTOR M/c~Laughlin Engineering &
/)/ ~ z/--~i~g' Inc.
~a~ne ~h~ce, V~ce President
Print Name and Title
RE:EASE R-I R:/cip/proj ects/pw-30/B id Doc
ITEM 18
ORDINANCE NO. 02-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDED ZONING STANDARDS
FOR THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 8
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural History. The City Council of the City of Temecula does
hereby find, determine and declare that:
Newland Communities LLC ("Owner")filed Planning Application No. PA01-01-0109
(General Plan Amendment), PA01-0102 (Specific Plan Amendment No. 8 to Specific
Plan Amendment No. 219 & Amendment of Planning Area No. 38 Zoning Standards),
PA 01-0117 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24188, Amendment No. 4) ('1he
application") in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code.
On November 7, 2001 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the project at which time all persons interested in the project
had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters.
Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing
and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 01-40 recommending to the City Council that the Project be approved,
subject to certain recommended conditions.
On January 8, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public
hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the
opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters.
At the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony,
the Council approved of the Application, and certified Addendum No. 4 to the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan, made all required
findings and determinations relative thereto and after finding that the project proposed in
the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan as amended.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula further
defines and declares that:
Specific Plan No.8 implements the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and
provides balanced and diversified land uses, and impose appropriate standards and
requirements with respect to land development and usage in order to maintain the
overall quality of life and the environment within the City.
Specific Plan No. 8 is consistent with the City's General Plan, and each Element
thereof, the City's Growth Management Program Action Plan and constitutes a
present valid exercise of the City's police power.
R:/Ords 2002/Ords 02-01 I
Specific Plan No. 8 is compatible with surrounding land uses. It proposes similar
residential neighborhood adjacent to existing surrounding neighborhoods. In addition, it
proposes commemial uses adjacent to existing commercial development.
d. Specific Plan No. 8 will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains
consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
The City Council finds the City of Temecula has certified Addendum No. 4 to the Final
Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan No. 8, made all required findings and
determinations relative thereto and finds that the Addendum was prepared consistent
with applicable CEQA provisions. The Council also finds that the Addendum was
considered in association with the approval of this Specific Plan Amendment.
Section 3. Adoption of Amended Zoninq Standards for the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan.
The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby adopts revised zoning standards for the
Paloma del Sol Specific Plan Amendment No. 8, as set forth in the attached Exhibit A.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 8th day of January, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Ords 2002/Ords 02-01 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 02-01 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th day of January, 2002, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 22n~ day of January, 2002 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Ords 2002/Ords 02-01 3
EXHIBIT A
AMENDED ZONING STANDARDS
R:/Ords 2002/Ords 02-01 4
Medium Density. Residential
Planning Area 4, ~i; 8 (if not seniors), 10, la, 17, 18, ~i~ 25, 26, 28 & 33
Medium Density Residential Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this Medium Density Residential Zone:
SECTION 6.1
USESPERMITTED.
a. The following uses shall be permitted in the Medium Density Residential Zone:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
One family dwellings.
Two-family dwellings.
Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length falnvays and
counlry clubs.
Home occupations.
Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to
the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the development
standards in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
bo
The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the
provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991):
(1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are
employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet in
area.
(2) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for
and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years
in any event.
(3) Nurseries, horticultural.
SECTION 6.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
shall apply in the Medium Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments
shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 348 ( 1991).
a. Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of forty feet (40).
Lot area shall be not less than 5,000 square feet. However, the lot area for two-family
dwellings shall be not less than 4,500 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. The minimum lot area shall
be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion
of a lot used as a building site.
rev. 10/24/01 -1-
The minimum average width of that portion ora lot to be used as a building site shall be 45
feet with a minimum average depth of 85 feet..However, for two-family dwelling lots, the
minimum average width shall be 40 feet with the same minimum'average depth of 85 feet.
That portion ora lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet.
The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 45 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-
de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may
be measured at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards.
Minimum yard requirements are as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than 10 feet, measured from the existing public right-
of-way street line or from any future public right-of-way street line as shown on any
Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 5 feet. Side yards on
comer and reversed comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing street
line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways,
whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides,
except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of
the width of the lot.
(3) The rear yard shall be not less than 15 feet. In addition, the following standard shall
also apply:
(a) No lot shall have more than 55% of its net area covered with buildings or
sl~uctures.
(4) No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard without
approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance.
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
rev. 10/24/01
Medium Density_ Residential (Senior)
Planning Area 8 (if seniors)
Medium Density Residential (Senior) Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this Medium Density Residential (Senior) Zone:
SECTION 6.1 USES PERMITTED.
a. The following uses shall be permitted in the Medium Density Residential (Senior) Zone:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
One family dwellings.
Public parks and public playgrounds.
Home occupations as permitted othemrise by City of Temecula Development Code.
Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to
the provisions Of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the development
standards in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the
provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991):
(1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are
employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet in
area.
(2) Tempora~ real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for
· and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years
unless such offices are combined with a community or recreation center in which
case not to exceed 5 years.
Nurseries, horticultural.
(3)
SECTION 6.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
shall apply in the Medium Density Residential (Senior) Zone, except that planned residential
developments shall Comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
a. Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of forty feet (40').
Lot area shall be not less than 4,000 square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined
by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as
a building site.
The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be 40
feet with a minimum average depth of 70 feet.
rev. 10/24/01
The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-
de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may
be measured at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards.
Minimum yard requirements are as follows (all setbacks are measured from the back of
sidewalk or, if there is no sidewalk, from the back of curb):
(1) The from yard shall be not less than: 10 feet to the living area of the building, 8 feet
to a porch, 18 feet to a front enlry garage, 8 feet from back of curb to a side entry
garage or 5 feet from back of sidewalk to a side entry garage.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 5 feet. Side yards on
comer and reversed comer lots shall be not less than I0 feet to the living area of a
building, 5 feet to a porch or 18 feet to a front entry garage on the street side of a
house. Side yard encroachments up to 2 feet are allowed for a chimney and/or media
niche. Where such projections are proposed on facing sides of adjacent dwelling
units, encroachments shall be off-set to allow adequate site drainage.
The rear yard shall be not less than 10 feet, except on comer lots where the rear yard
shall not be less than 5 feet provided the street side yard shall not be less than 10 feet.
Where courtyards are included on the interior side of the structure then the rear yard
shall not be less than 8 feet.
No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side Or rear yard without
approval of a setback adjusunent pursuant to City Ordinance.
Patio covers are allowed in rear yard areas only, except for end units which are
allowed patio covers only in courtyard areas. Patio covers shall be set back from rear
or side property lines as follows: 5 feet minimum to a support post, 3 feet minimum
to the edge of the shade smacture (canopy).
(3)
(4)
(5)
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
rev. 10/24/01 -4-
Medium Density. Residential
Planning Areas 9 & 31
Medium Density Residential Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this Medium Density Residential Zone:
SECTION 6.1
USES PERMITTED.
a. The following uses shall be permitted in the Medium Density Residential Zone:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
One family dwellings.
Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways and
countl') clubs.
Home occupations.
Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to
the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the development
standards in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the
provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991):
(1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are
employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet in
(2) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for
and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years
in any event.
(3) Nurseries, horticultural.
SECTION 6.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of devdopment
shall apply in the Medium Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments
shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
a. Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of forty feet (40').
Lot area shall be not less than 7,200 square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined
by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as
a building site.
The minimum average width of that portion ora lot to be used as a building site shall be 60
feet with a minimum average depth of 100 feet. That portion of a lot used for access on
"flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet.
rev. 10/24/01 -5-
The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 60 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-
de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may
be measured at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards.
Minimum yard requirements are as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than 15 feet, measured from the existing public right.
of-way street line or from any future public fight-of-way street line as shown on any
Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than t 0% of the width of the
lot, but not less than 3 feet in width in any event, and need not exceed a width of 5
feet. Side yards on comer and reversed comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet from
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan
of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main
building sides, except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not
exceed 20% of the width of the lot.
The rear yard shall be not less than 10 feet.
No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the fi-om, side or rear yard without
approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance.
'(3)
(4)
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
rev: 10/24/01 -6-
Medium High Density Residential
Planning Areas 2, 3,-~,, 13, 15, 16; 20, 21, ~4 22
Medium High Density Residential Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this Medium High Density Residential Zone:
SECTION 6.1
USESPERMITTED.
a. The following uses shall be permitted in the Medium High Density Residential Zone:
(1) One family dwellings.
(2) Two family dwellings.
(2) Pul~lic parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways and
countD' clubs.
(3) Home occupations.
(4) Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to
the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991 ) and the development
standards in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the
provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991):
(I) Beauty shops operated f~om a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are
employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet in
area.
(2) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for
and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years
in any event.
(3) Nurseries, horticultural.
SECTION 6.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
shall apply in the Medium High Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential
developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
a. Building height shall not exceed 3 stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
Lot area shall be not less than 4,000 square feet. However, the lot area for two-family
dwellings shall be not less than 3,500 square feet per dwelling unit. The minimum lot area
shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the
portion of a lot used as a building site.
rev. 10/24/01 -7-
The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be 40
feet with a minimum average depth of 80 feet. However, for two-family dwelling lots, the
minimum average width shall be 40 feet with the same minimum average depth of 75 feet.
That portion ora lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet.
The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-
de-~acs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may
be measured at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards.
Minimum yard requirements are as follows:
( 1 ) The front yard shall be not less than 10 feet, measured from the existing public fight-
of-way slreet line or from any future public right-of-way street line as shown on any
Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 5 feet. Side yards on
comer and reversed comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing street
line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways,
whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides,
except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of
the width of the lot.
(3) The rear yard shall be not less than 15 feet. In addition, the following standard shall
also apply:
(a) No lot shall have more than 55% of its net area covered with buildings or
structures.
(4) No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard without
approval of a setback adjuslment pursuant to City Ordinance.
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
rev. 10/24/01 -8-
High Density Residential
Planning Area 6A
High Density Residential Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this High Density Residential Zone:
SECTION 8.1
USES PERMITTED.
The following uses shall be permitted provided approval of a plot plan shall first have been
obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348
(1991):
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Any use permitted in the Medium Density Residential Zone..
Apartment houses or condominiums.
Nursery schools for preschool day care.
Institutions for the aged licensed by the California State Departtnent of Social
Welfare or the County Department of Public Welfare.
Accessory.buildings, to a specific permitted use, provided that the accessory building is
established as an incident to a principal use and does not change the character of that use.
On-site signs, affixed to building walls, stating the name of the structure, use or institution,
not to exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area of the exterior face of the wall upon which
the sign is located.
The follgwing uses shall be permitted provided a conditional use permit is obtained pursuant
to this ordinance:
(1) Evening nursery school, child care and babysitting facilities, where 13 or more
unrelated children are kept under supervision by a person licensed by the State
Department of Social Welfare or Riverside County Depa~hnent of Public Welfare
during any hours between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m.
(2) Congregate care residential facilities, developed pursuant to City Ordinance, County
and State Codes and Ordinances.
Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved pursuant to the
provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the developmem standards
in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
SECTION 8.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
shall apply in the High Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments shall
comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County Ordinance
No. 348 (1991).
rev. 10/24/01 -9-
ao
bo
The minimum lot area shall be 7,200 square feet for a multifamily or condominium project
with a minimum average width of 60 feet and a minimum average depth of 100 feet. The
minimum lot area for small lot single family detached shall be 3,000 square feet with a
minimum average width of 30 feet and a minimum average depth of 100 feet.
For a single family detached product, the minimum from and rear yards setback to the main
structure (livable portion of the building) or a side loaded garage shall be 5 feet. The
minimum front setback for a front-loaded garage shall be 16 feet from the back of sidewalk
and a roll up garage door shall be required. If the garage is located in the rear of the lot and
is accessed from the front, the rear setback shall be 5 feet and the garage shall be a single
story smacture. If the garage is located in the rear and accessed by an alley, the minimum
rear setback as measured, from the centerline of the alley shall be 10 feet. The alley width
shall be a minimum of 20 feet. The from setback shall be measuredfrom any existing or
furore public or private right-of-way street line as shown on any specific street plan of the
City. The rear setback shall be measured from ~e existing rear lot line or from the eenterline
of any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback
requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback.
The minimum side yard shall be 5 feet, if the side yard adjoins a slxeet, the side setback
requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. No structural encroachments
shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard except as allowed by City Ordinance.
The maximum density shall be twelve (12) units per acre.
All buildings and structures shall not exceed 35 feet in height.
· Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (199.1).
rev. 10/24/01 -10-
Very. High Density. Residential
Planning Area 6B
Very High Density Residential Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this Very High Density Residential Zone:
SECTION 8.1
USESPERMITTED.
The following uses shall be permitted provided approval ora plot plan shall first have been
obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348
(1991):
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Any use permitted in the Medium High Density Residential Zone.
Apartment houses.
Nursery schools for preschool day care.
Institutions for the aged licensed by the California State Department of Social
Welfare or the County Department of Public Welfare.
Accessory buildings, to a specific permitted use, provided that the accessory.buildIng is
established as an incident to a principal use and does not change the character of that use.
On-site signs, affixed to building walls, stating the name of the structure, use or institution,
not to exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area of the exterior face of the wall upon which
the sign is located.
do
The following uses shall be permitted provided a conditional use permit is obtained pursnant
to this ordinance:
(1) Evening nursery school, child care and babysitting facilities, where 13 or more
unrelated children are kept under supervision by a person licensed by the State
Department of Social Welfare or Riverside County Deparunant of Public Welfare
during any hours between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m.
(2) Congregate care residential facilities, developed pursuant to City Ordinance, County
and State Codes and Ordinances.
Planned residential developments, provided a land division is approved purs~mnt to the
provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 (1991) and the development standards
in Section 18.5 or 18.6 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 ( 1991 ).
SECTION 8.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
shall apply in the Very High Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments
shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
rev. 10/24/01 -11~
f.
g.
h.
The minimum lot area shall be 7,200 square feet with a minimum average width of 60 feet
and a minimum average depth of 100 feet, unless differem minimums are specifically
required in a particular area.
The minimum front and rear yards shall be 10 feet for buildings that do not exceed 35 feet
in height. Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height shall be set back from
the front and rear lot lines no less than 10 feet plus 2 feet for each foot by which the height
exceeds 35 feet. The front setback shall be measured from any existing or future public
right-of-way street line as shown on any specific street plan of the City. The rear setback
shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if
the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shall be the same a s required for
a front setback.
The minimum side yard shall be 5 feet for buildings that do not exceed 35 feet in height.
Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height shall be set back from each side
lot line 5 feet plus 2 feet for each foot by which the height exceeds 35 feet; if the side yard
adjoins a street, the side setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front
setback. No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard
without approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance.
High density multi-family dwelling units shall be set back a minimum of 18 feet from any
existing or future public right-of-way street line as shown on any specific street plan of the
City. Said setback shall be applicable for front, rear and side yards should they adjoin a
street.
No lot shall have more than 50 percent of its net area covered with buildings or structures.
The maximum density shall be twenty (20) units per acre.
All buildings and structures shall not exceed 50 feet in height.
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991)i
rev. 10F24/01 -12-
Community/Neighborhood Commercial
Planning Areas 1, -2-7-and 36 ~!3~ ,~.~
For Planning Areas l(a) & l(b), see Pages 18--2~
Community/Neighborhood Commercial Zone
The following regulations shall apply in all Community/Neighborhood Commercial Zones:
SECTION 9.1
uses PEa _IrreD.
The following uses are permitted, only in enclosed buildings with not more than 200 square
feet of outside storage or display of materials appurtenant to such use, provided a
'Development Plan is approved.
(1) Antique Shops.
(2) Appliance Store, household, not to exceed 10,000 square feet
(3) Art supply shops and studios.
(4) Art and fine art sales.
· (5) Automobile parts and supply stores, not to exceed 7,500 square feet.
(6) Bakery goods dist~butors, not to exceed 7,500 square feet.
(7) Bakery shops, including baking only when incidental to retail sales on the premises.
(8) Banks and financial institutions with walk-up or drive-up teller or ATM.
(9) Barber and beauty shops.
(10) Barbecue Stores.
(11) Baseball ticket, card and logo merchandise stores.
(12) Beauty aid/supply and/or health stores.
(13) Bed and bath stores.
(14) Blind and window cover stores.
(15) Blueprint and duplicating services, copy shops or 24-hour Copy and Business Service
Stores.
(16) Book stores and binders.
(17) Building materials with more than 75% indoor including the outdoor sale of garden
supplies.
(18) Card and gift stores.
(19) Car washes.
(20) Carpet or floor covering stores.
(21) Catering services.
(22) Ceramic painting stores.
(23) Check cashing centers..
(24) Child learning centers.
(25) Children's store including educational toys and gifts.
(26) Civic and government uses including post office and library uses.
(27) Cleaning and dying shops.
(28) Clothing stores, not to exceed 25,000 square feet.
(29) Coffee houses.
(30) Confectionery or candy stores.
rev. 10/24/01 -13-
(31) Convenience stores, not including the sale of motor vehicle fuel.
(32) Day care centers.
(33) Delicatessens.
(34) Depattmem stores not to exceed 50,000 square feet.
(35) Dollar stores.
(36) Donut shops.
(37) Drug stores with drive-thru, not to exceed 20,000 square feet.
(38) Dry goods or general merchandise stores.
(39) Employment agencies.
(40) Express delivery collection points.
(41) Fabric stores.
(42) Feed and grain sales only as an incidental accessory use to a pet shop.
(43) Fimess club (including 24-hour operation).
(44) Florist shops.
(45) Food markets and frozen food lockers.
(46) Frame, lens or eyeglass stores.
(47) Furniture Stores.
(48) Gasoline service stations, not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-
premises consumption.
(49) Gift shops.
(50) Golf equipment stores.
(51) Hardware stores.
(52) Health centers, or similar personal service establishments, not to exceed 7,500 square
feet.
(53) Household goods sales, including but not limited to, new and used appliances,
furniture, carpets, draperies, lamps, radios and television sets, including repak
thereof.
(54) Hobby shops.
(55) Honey baked ham stores.
(56) Ice cream, yogurt, frozen yogurt or juice shops.
(57) Ice sales, not including ice plants.
(58) Interior decorating shops.
(59) Jewelry stores, including incidental repairs.
(60) Laboratories, film, dental, medical, research or testing.
(61) Laundries and laundromats.
(62) Leather goods stores.
(63) Linen stores.
(64) Loan stores.
(65) Locksmith shops.
(66) Mail Order or intemet businesses.
(67) MatU-ess or bed stores.
(68) Meat markets, not including slaughtering.
(69) Music, media, or video rental stores.
(70) Musical insU-uments stores.
(71) Nail and manicure stores.
(72) Newsstands.
(73) Notions, novelty or tabletop stores.
rev. 10/24/01 -14-
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(8o)
<81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(9])
(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(lOO)
(]01)
(]o2)
(103)
(104)
(]05)
(106)
007)
008)
(]09)
(]1o)
(] 12)
(113)
(] ]4)
.015)
(116)
(]17)
Nursery schools for preschool day care.
Offices, including business, law, medical, dental, chiropractic, architectural,
engineering, community planning and real estate.
Office supplies including home office service stores.
Outlet stores.
Paint and wallpaper stores, not including paint contractors, not to exceed 10,000
square feet.
Party supply stores.
Patio furniture stores.
Pet shops and pet supply shops.
Photography shops and studios and photo engraving.
Pizza eat-in, take-out or delivery stores.
Plumbing shops, not including plumbing conlxactors, not to exceed 10,000 square
feet.
Postal annex stores.
Printer or publishers.
Produce markets.
Radio and television broadcasting studios.
Recording studios.
Recycling collection facilities with no outdoor storage allowed.
Refreshments stands.
Restaurants and other eating establishments, including those serving beer, wine or
alcohol and with outdoor seeting.
Schools, business and professional, including art, barber, beauty, dance, drama,
karate, martial arts, music and swimming.
Shoe stores and repair shops.
Shoeshine stands.
Shopping center management and leasing offices.
Sign shops including instant signs and on-site advertising and sponsorship.
Sporting goods stores, not to exceed 40,000 square feet.
Speaker stores, including small appliances.
Stained glass assembly or ceramic painting stores.
Stationery stores.
Suntanning stores.
Supplemental, diet or weight loss stores.
Tabletop and gift stores.
Taxidermist.
Tailor shops.
Theater, not including drive-ins.
Tire sales and service, not including recapping.
Tobacco shops.
Tourist information centers.
Toy shops.
Travel agencies.
Typewriter sales and rental, including incidental repairs.
Vitamin shops.
Watch repair shops.
Wholesale businesses with samples on the premises but not including storage.
Wine tasting rooms and sales.
rev. 10/24/01 -15-
The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted
pursuant to City Ordinance.
(1) Convenience stores, including the sale of motor vehicle fuel.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Gasoline service stations with the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises
consumption.
Liquid pe~xoleum service station with the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-
premises consumption, provided the total capacity of all tanks shall no exceed 10,000
gallons.
Bars and cocktail lounges.
Billiard and pool halls.
Dance halls.
Fast food restaurants with drive-thru.
Multifamily or mixed use multifamily/commercial uses provided a Developmem Plan is
approved in accordance with the City of Temecula Development Code.
Any use that is not specifically listed in Subsections a., b. and c. may be considered a
permitted or conditionally permitted use provided that the Planning Director finds that the
proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the
designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process which governs the
category in which it falls.
SECTION 9.2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Planned Commercial
D~velopments are permitted provided a land division is approved pursuant to the provisions of City
or Temecula Ordinance No. 460 (1991).
SECTION 9.3
~ELETED)
SECTION 9.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
are required in the Community/Neighborhood Commercial Zones:
There is no minimum lot area requirement, unless specifically required by zone classification
for a particular area.
There are no yard requiremems for buildings which do no exceed 35 feet in height except as
required for specific plans. Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height shall
be setback from the from, rear and side lot lines not less than 2 feet for each foot by which
the height exceeds 35 feet. The from setback shall be measured from the existing public
right-of-way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will be
measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the
existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easemem; if the rear line adjoins a slzeet,
the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. Each side
setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from an existing adjacent public right-of-
way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted, in which case it will be measured
from the specific plan street line.
rev. 10/24/01 -16-
All buildings and structure shall 'no exceed 50 feet in height.
Automobile storage space shall be provided in accordance with the City of Temecula
Developmem Code. as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348
(1991).
All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view
to a minimum sight distance of 1,320 feet.
rev. 10/24/01 -17-
Community/Neighborhood Commercial
Planning Area l(a) - Village Core as crosshatched on Exhibit "A'
attached hereto and made a part hereof
The following regulations shall apply in the Village Core Commercial Planning Area 1 (a) Zone of
the Villages ~ Paseo del Sol.
SECTION 9.1
USESPERMITTED.
The following uses are permitted only in enclosed buildings.
(1) Art and fine art sales.
(2) Art supply and studios not to exceed 3,000 square feet.
(3) Bakery shops, including baking only when incidental to retail sales on the premises.
(4) Banks and financial institutions with walk-up or ATM in Building J except for 1,600
square foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(5) Barber and beauty shops.
(6) Baseball ticket, card and/or logo merchandise store.
(7) Beauty aide/supply store and/or health store.
(8) Blueprint and duplicating services or 24 hour Copy and Business Service Store in
Building B or in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on southeast comer
on Plaza.
(9) Book stores and binders not to exceed 2,000 square feet.
(10) Card and gift store which may include antiques as incidental sales.
(11) Check cashing center in Building B or in Building J except for 1,600 square foot
space on southeast comer on Plaza..
(12) Child learning center in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on southeast
comer on Plaza
(13) Children's store including educational toys and gifts.
(14) Civic and government uses including post o~ce and library uses.
(15) Clean/ng, dying or tailor shops.
(16) Clothing stores, not to exceed 5,000 square feet.
(17) Coffee house.
(18) Confectionery or candy stores.
(19) Copy shop in Building B or in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on
southeast corner on Plaza.
(20) Day care centers in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on southeast corner
on Plaza.
(21) Delicatessens.
(22) Dental or medical offices in Building J except for 1,600 square foot spaCe on
southeast corner on Plaza.
(23) Donut shop.
(24) Dry goods or general merchandise stores not to exceed 3,000 square feet.
rev. 10/24/01 -18-
(25) Employment agencies in Building B or in Building J except for 1,600 square foot
space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(26) Express delivery collection poim in Building B or in Building J except for 1,600
square foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(27) Fabric store not to exceed 3,000 square feet.
(28) Florist shops including can or kiosk.
(29) Frame, lens or eye glass store in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on
~outheast comer on Plaza.
(30) Health centers or similar personal service establishments, not to exceed 10,000
square feet in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on southeast comer on
Plaza.
(31) Health and beauty aids store.
(32) Household goods sales, including but not limited to, new and used appliances,
furniture, carpets, draperies, lamps, radios and television sets, including repair thereof
not to exceed 1,000 square feet.
(33) Hobby shops and toy store not to exceed 5,000 square feet.
(34) Honey~aked ham store.
(35) Ice cream, yogurt, frozen yogurt or juice shops.
(36) Information center.
(37) Interior decorating shops in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on
southeast comer on Plaza.
(38) Jewelry stores, including incidental repairs.
(39) Laboratories, film, dental, medical, research or testing in Building J except for 1,600
square foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(40) Leather goods stores.
(41) Linen store not to exceed 2,000 square feet.
(42) Loan store in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on southeast comer on
Plaza.
(43) Locksmith shops.
(44) Luggage stores.
(45) Mail order or intemet businesses in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on
southeast comer on Plaza or any retailer as incidental to its operating retail store.
(46) Medical or dental offices in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on
southeast comer on Plaza.
(47) Meat markets, not including slaughtering.
(48) Music, media, or video rental stores not to exceed 2,000 square feet.
(49) Musical instrument store.
(50) Nail and manicure store.
(51) Newsstands.
(52) Notions, novelty or tabletop stores.
(53) Nursery schools for preschool day care in Building J except for 1,600 square foot
space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(54) Offices, including business, law, medical, dental, chiropractic, architectural,
engineering, community planning and real estate in Building J except for 1,600
square foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(55) Party supPly store.
(56) Pet shops and pet supply shops not to exceed 3,000 square feet.
rev. 10/24/01 -19-
(57) Photography shops and studios and photo engraving.
(58) Pizza eat-in, take-out or delivery store.
(59) Postal annex store.
(60) Post Office.
(61) Printer or publishers in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on southeast
comer on Plaza.
(62) Produce markets, carts or kiosk.
(63) Radio and Ielevision broadcasting studios or remote broadcasting.
(64) Real Estate office in Building B or in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space
on southeast comer on Plaza.
(65) Recording studios.
(66). Recycling collection facilities incidental to a retail store operation, but not including
outdoor storage.
(67) Refreshment stands.
(68) Restaurants and other eating establishments, including those serving beer, wine or
alcohol and with outdoor seating and including bakery goods baked on premises for
distribution and allowing catering services as an integral use. Also, music and
dancing is allowed as part of a restaurant and lounge operation.
(69) Schools, business and professional, including art, barber, beauty, dance, drama,
karate, martial arts, music and swimming in Building J except for 1,600 square foot
space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(70) Shoe stores and repair shops.
(71) Shoeshine stands.
(72) Shopping center management and lea~ing office in Building J except for 1,600 square
foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(73) Sign shops including instant signs and on-site advertising and sponsorship in
Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(74) Sporting goods stores, not to exceed 3,000 square feet.
(75) Speaker stores, including small appliances not to exceed 3,000 square feet.
(76) Stained glass assembly or ceramic painting store.
(77) Stationery stores.
(78) Suntan store.
(79) Supplement, diet or weight loss store in Building B or in Building J except for 1,600
square foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(80) Tabletop & gifts.
(81) Tailor shops.
(82) Tobacco shops.
(83) Tourist information centers.
(84) Toy shops not to exceed 2,500 square feet.
(85) Travel agencies.
(86) Typewriter or computer sales and rental, including incidental repairs and training in
Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
(87) Vitamin shop.
(88) Watch repair shops.
(89) Wholesale businesses with samples on the premises but not including storage or
distribution from the premises in Building J except for 1,600 square foot space on
southeast comer on Plaza.
(90) Wine Tasting Room and sales.
rev. 10/24/01 -20-
The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted
pursuant to City Ordinance.
(1) Bars and cocktail lounges.
(2) Billiard and pool halls.
(3) Evening nursery school, child care and babysitting facilities, where 13 or more
unrelated children are kept under supervision by a person licensed by the State
Department of Social Welfare or Riverside County Department of Public Welfare
during any hours between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m. in Building J except for 1,600 square
foot space on southeast comer on Plaza.
Any use that is not specifically listed in Subsections a and b. may be considered a permitted
or conditionally permitted use provided that the Community Development Director or
Planning Manager finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and
intensity as those listed in the designated subsections and the Village Concept overlay. Such
a use is subject to the permit process which governs the category in which it falls.
SECTION 9.2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Planned Commercial
Developments are permitted provided a land division is approved pursuant to the provisions of City
or Temecula Subdivision Ordinance.
SECTION 9.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
are required in the Village Core:
There are no minimum lot area requirements, unless specifically required by zone
classification for a particular area.
(2)
There are no yard requirements for buildings which do not exceed 35 feet in height except
as required for specific plans. Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height
shall be setback from the front, rear and side lot lines not less than 2 feet for each foot by
which the height exceeds 35 feet. The front setback shall be measured from the existing
public right-of-way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will
be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the
existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street,
the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. Each side
setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from an existing adjacent public right-of-
way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted, in which case it will be measured
from the specific plan street line.'
(3)
(4)
(5)
All buildings and structure shall not exceed 50 feet in height.
Calculation of required parking spaces required shall be provided as required by City of
Temecula Development Code. Landscaping of parking area shall be consistent with the
Specific Plan Amendment No. 7 as approved.
All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view
to a minimum sight distance of 1,320 feet at same grade as finished floor.
rev. 10/24/01 -21-
rev. 10/24/01 -2~~
Community/Neighborhood Commercial
Planning Area l(b) - Retail Villages shown on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof, excluding the Village Core.
The following regulations shall apply in the Retail Villages Planning Area 1 (b) of the Retail Villages
the Villages ~ Paseo del Sol.
SECTION 9.1
USES PERMITTED.
The following uses are permitted only in enclosed buildings.
(1) Antique Shops.
(2) Appliance Store or Electronic Store household, not to exceed 20,000 square feet.
(3) An supply shops and studios.
(4) An and fine art sales.
(5) Amomobile pans and supply stores, not to exceed 7,500 square feet.
(6) Bakery goods distributors, not to exceed 7,500 square feet.
(7) Bakery shops, including baking only when incidental to retail sales on the premises.
(8) Banks and financial institutions with walk-up or drive-up teller or ATM.
(9) Barber and beauty shops.
(10) Barbecue store.
(11) Baseball ticket, card and/or logo merchandise store.
(12) Beauty supply store.
(13) Bed and bath store.
(14) Blind or window cover store.
(15) Blueprint and duplicating services or 24 hour Copy and Business Service Store.
(16) Book stores and binders.
(17) Card and Gift store.
(18) Car washes.
(19) Carpet or floor covering store.
(20) Catering services.
(21) Ceramic painting store.
(22) Check cashing center.
(23) Child learning center.
(24) Children's store including educational toys and gifts.
(25) Civic and government uses including post office and library uses.
(26) Cleaning, dying or tailor shops.
(27) Clothing stores, not to exceed 25,000 square feet:
(28) Coffee house.
(29) Confectionery or candy stores.
(30) Convenience stores, not including the sale of motor vehicle fuel.
(31) Day care centers.
(32) Delicatessens.
(33) Dental or medical offices.
(34) Department stores not to exceed 50,000 square feet.
rev. 10/24/01 -23-
(35) Donut shop.
(36) Drug stores with drive-thru, not to exceed 20,000 square feet.
(37) Dry goods or general merchandise stores.
(38) Employment agencies.
(39) Express delivery collection point.
(40) Fabric store.
(41) Feed and grain sales only .as an incidental accessory use to a pet shop.
(42) Fitness club (including 24 hour operation).
(43) Florist shops.
(44) Food markets and frozen food lockers.
(45) Frame, lens or eye glass store.
(46) Furniture Store.
(47) Gasoline serVice stations, not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-
premises consumption.
(48) Oolf equipment store.
(49) Hardware store.
(50) Health centers or similar personal service establishments, not to exceed 10,000
square feet.
(51) Health and beauty aids store.
(52) Home Improvement Store with the outdoor sale of gardening supplies and plants in
enclosed area with no roof, seasonal sales in a designated area of the parking lot and
merchandise for sale or rent along storefront in designated striped areas as approved
on the site plan.
(53) Household goods sales, including but not limited to, new and used appliances,
furniture, carpets, draperies, lamps, radios and television sets, including repair
thereof.
(54) . Hobby shops and toy store.
(55) Honey baked ham store.
(56) Ice cream, yogurt, frozen yogurt or juice shops.
(57) Ice sales, not including ice plants incidental to a food, convenience or liquor store.
(58) Information center.
(59) Interior decorating shops.
(60) Jewelry stores, including incidental repairs.
(61) Laundries and laundromats.
(62) Leather goods stores.
(63) Linen store.
(64) Loan store.
(65) Locksmith shops.
(66) Mail order or intemet businesses.
(67) Mattress or bed store.
(68) Meat markets, not including slaughtering.
(69) Music, media, or video rental stores.
(70) Musical instrument store.
(71) Nail and manicure store.
(72) Newsstands.
(73) Notions, novelty or tabletop stores.
(74) Nursery schools for preschool day care.
rev. 10/24/01 -24-
(75) Office supplies including home office service stores.
(76) Offices, including business, law, medical, dental, chiropractic, architectural,
engineering, community planning and real estate.
(77) Paint and wallpaper, not including paint contractors, not to exceed 10,000 square
feet.
(78) Party supply store.
(79) Patio furniture store.
(80) Pet shops and pet supply shops.
(81) Photography shops and studios and photo engraving.
(82) Pizza eat-in, take-out or delivery store.
(83) Plumbing shops, not including plumbing contractors, not to exceed I0,000 square
feet.
(84) Postal annex store.
(85) Post Office.
(86) Printer or publishers.
(87) Produce markets.
(88) Radio and television broadcasting studios or remote broadcasting.
(89) Real Estate Office.
(90) Recording studios.
(91) Recycling collection facilities incidental to a retail store operation, but not including
outdoor storage.
(92) Refreshment stands.
(93) Restaurants and other eating establishments including catering, and including those
serving beer, wine or alcohol and with outdoor seating, including dancing.
(94) Schools, business and professional, including art, barber, beauty, dance, drama,
karate, martial arts, music and swimming.
(95) Shoe stores and repair shops.
(96) Shoeshine stands.
(97) Shopping Center Management and Leasing Office.
(98) Sign shop including instant signs and on-site advertising and sponsorship.
(99) Sporting goods stores, not to exceed 40,000 square feet.
(100) Speaker store, including small appliances.
(101) Stal~ed glass assembly or ceramic painting store.
(102) Stationery stores.
(I03) Suntan store.
(104) Supplement, diet or weight loss store.
(105) Tabletop & gift stores.
(106) Tailor shops.
(107) Theater, not including ckive-ins.
(108) Tire sales and service, not including recapping.
(109) Tobacco shops.
(Il0) Tourist information centers.
(lll) Toy shops.
(ll2) Travel agencies.
(113) Typewriter or computer sales and rental, including incidental repairs and training.
(114) Vitamin shop.
(115) Watch repair shops.
rev. 10/24/01 -25-
(116) Wholesale businesses with samples on the premises but not including storage.
(117) Wine Tasting Room and sales.
The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted
pursuant to City Ordinance.
(1) Convenience stores, including the sale of motor vehicle fuel.
(2) Gasoline service stations, including liquid petroleum ("LPG")(provided the total
capacity of the LPG tanks shall not exceed 10,000 gallons) with the concurrent sale
of beer and wine for off-premises consumption.
(3) Bars and cocktail lounges.
(4) Billiard and pool halls.
(5) Dance halls.
(6) Fast food restaurants with drive-through.
(7) Evening nursery school, child care and babysitting facilities, where 13 or more
unrelated children are kept under supervision by a person licensed by the State
Department of Social Welfare or Riverside County Department of Public Welfare
during any hours between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m.
Any use that is not specifically listed in Subsections a and b. may be considered a permitted
or conditionally permitted use provided that the Community Development Director or
Planning Manager finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and
intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit
process which governs the category in which it falls.
SECTION 9.2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Planned Commercial
Developments are permitted provided a land division is approved pursuant to the provisions of City
or Temecula Subdivision Ordinance.
SECTION 9.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
are required in the Community/Neighborhood Commercial Zones:
There are no minimum lot area requirements, unless specifically required by zone
classification for a particular area.
There are no yard requirements for buildings which do not exceed 35 feet in height except
as required for specific plans. Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height
shall be setback from the front, rear and side lot lines not less than 2 feet for each foot by
which the height exceeds 35 feet. The front setback shall be measured from the existing
public right-of-way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will
be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured fi.om the
existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a stxeet,
the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a fi.ont setback. Each side
setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from an existing adjacent public right-of-
way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted, in which case it will be measured
fi.om the specific plan street line.
c. All buildings and structure shall not exceed 50 feet in height.
rev. 10/24/01 -26-
Calculation of required parking spaces shall be calculated and provided as required by City
of Temecula Development Code. Landscaping of parking area shall be consistent with
Specific Plan 219 Amendment No. 7.
All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view
to a minimum sight distance of 1,320 feet at same grade as finished floor.
rev. 10/24/Ol -27- '
!
,~ ~i fllltJlHlllJlllltl11111tHg ~ ]':
rev. 10/24/01 -28-
Day Care Center/Information Center
Planning Area 34
Day Care Center/Information Center Zone
The following regulations shall apply in the Day Care Center/Information Center Zone:
SECTION 8.1
USESPERMITTED.
The following uses shall be permitted provided approval of a plot plan shall first have been
obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348
(1991):
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Nursery schools for preschool day care.
Institutions for the aged licensed by the California State Depaxtment of Social
Welfare or the County Depmtment of Public Welfare.
Architectural, engineering and community planning offices; provided there is no
outdoor storage of material, equipment or vehicles, other than passenger cars.
Congregate care residential facilities.
Information center.
Accessory buildings, to a specific permitted use, provided that the accessory building is
established as an incident to a principal use and does not change the character of that use.
On-site signs, affixed to building walls, stating the name of the structure, use or institution,
not to exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area of the exterior face of the wall upon which
the sign is located.
The following uses shall be permitted provided a conditional use permit is obtained pursuant
to this ordinance:
(1)
(2)
Evening nursery school, child care and babysitting facilities, where 13 or more
unrelated children are kept under supervision by a person licensed by the State
Department of Social Welfare or Riverside County Department of Public Welfare
during any hours between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m.
Congregate care residential facilities, developed pursuant to City Ordinance, County
and State Codes and Ordinances.
SECTION 8.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
are required in the Day Care Center/Information Center Zone.
There is no minimum lot area requirement, unless specifically required by zone classification
for a particular area.
rev. 10/24/01 -29-
There are no yard requirements for buildings which do no exceed 35 feet in height except as
required for specific plans. Any portion of a building which exceeds 35 feet in height shall
be setback from the front, rear and side lot lines not less than 2 feet for each foot by which
the height exceeds 35 feet. The front setback shall be measured from the existing public
right-of-way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will be
measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the
existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street,
the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. Each side
setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from an existing adjacent public fight-of-
way street line unless a specific plan has been adopted, in which case it will be measured
from the specific plan street line.
All buildings and structure shall noi exceed 50 feet in height.
Automob.ile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
· County Ordinance No. 348 (1991!.
All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view
to a minimum sight distance of 1,320 feet.
rev. 10/24/01
Elementary. School
Planning Area 7
School/Medium Density Residential Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this Medium Density Residential Zone:
SECTION 6.1
USESPERMITTED.
The following uses shall be permitted in the Medium Density Residential Zone:
(1) One family dwellings.
(2) Two-family dwellings.
(3) Public schools.
(4) Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways and
country clubs.
(5) Home occupations.
The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the
provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 ( 1991 ):
(1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are
employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet in
area.
(2) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for
and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years
in any event.
(3) Nurseries, horticultural.
SECTION 6.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
shall apply in the School/Medium Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential
developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
a. Bmld~ng height shall not exceed three (3) stones, w~th a maximum hexght of forty feet (0).
Lot area shall be not less than 7,200 square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined
by excluding that portion ora lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as
a building site.
The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be 60
feet with a minimum average depth of 100 feet. That portion of a lot used for access on
"flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet.
rev. 10/24/01 -31-
The minimum frontage of a lot shall be 60 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-
de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may
be measured at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards.
Minimum yard reqniremems are as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than 20 feet, measured from the existing public right-
of-way street line or from any future public right-of-way street line as shown on any
Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 10% of the width of the
lot, but not less than 3 feet in width in any event, and need not exceed a width of 5
feet. Side yards on comer and reversed comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet fi.om
the existing public right-of way street line or from any future public right-of-way
street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the
proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is
less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of the width of the lot.
(3) The rear yard shall be not less than 10 feet.
(4) No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard without
approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance.
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
rev. 10/24/01 -32-
Elementary_ School
Planning Area 11
School/Medium High Density Residential Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this Medium High Density Residential Zone:
SECTION 6.1
USES PERMITTED.
The following uses shall be permitted in the School/Medium High Density Residential Zone:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
One family dwellings.
Two-family dwellings.
Public schools.
Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways and
countr3; clubs.
Home occupations.
The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the
provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991):
(1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are
employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet in
area.
(2) Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for
and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of 2 years
in any event.
Nurseries, horticultural.
(3)
SECTION 6.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
shall apply in the School/Medium High Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential
developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
a. Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of forty feet (40').
Lot area shall be not less than 4,000 square feet. However, the lot area for two-family
dwellings shall be not less than 3,500 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. The minimum lot area shall
be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion
of a lot used as a building site.
The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be 40
feet with a minimum average depth of S0 feet. However, for two-family dwelling lots, the
minimum average width shall be 40 feet with the same minimum average depth of 75 feet.
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet.
rev. 10/24/01 -33-
The minimum frontage ora lot shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-
de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may
be measured at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards.
Minimum yard requirements are as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than 10 feet, measured from the existing public right-
of-way street line or from any furore public right-of-way street line as shown on any
Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 5 feet. Side yards on
comer and reversed comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing street
line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways,
whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides,
except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of
the width of the lot.
(3) The rear yard shall be not less than 15 feet. In addition, the following standard shall
also apply:
(a) No lot shall have more than 55% of its net area covered with buildings or
structures.
(4) No structural ~ncroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or mar yard without
approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance.
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991). . .
rev. 10/24/01 -34-
Planning Area~ 29B, 30 and 32
School/Medium Density Residential Zone
The following regulations shall apply in this Medium Density Residential Zone:
SECTION 6.1
USES PERMITTED.
ao
The following uses shall be permitted in the Medium Density Residential Zone:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
One family dwellings.
Two-family dwellings.
Public schools.
Public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways and
country clubs.
Home occupations.
The following uses are permitted provided a plot plan has been approved pursuant to the
provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991):
(1) Beauty shops operated from a home by its inhabitants where no assistants are
employed and the on-site sign is unlighted and does not exceed two square feet in
(2) Temporary real estate ~xact offices located witkin a subdivision, to be used only for
and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a p~riod of 2 years
in any event.
(3) Nurseries, horticultural.
SECTION6.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards of development
shall apply in the Medium Density Residential Zone, except that planned residential developments
shall comply with the development standards contained in Section 18.5 of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
a. Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of forty feet (40').
Lot area shall be not less than 5,000 squaxe feet. However, the lot area for two-family
dwellings shall be not less than 4,500 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. The minimum lot area shall
be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion
of a lot used as a building site.
The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be 45
feet with a minimum average depth of 85 feet. However, for two-family dwelling lots, the
minimum average width shall be 40 feet with the same minimum average depth of 80 feet.
That portion ora lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of 20 feet.
rev. 10/24/01 -35-
The minimum frontage ora lot shall be 45 feet, except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-
de4acs may have a minimum frontage of 35 feet. Lot frontage along curvilinear streets may
be measured at the building setback in accordance with zone development standards.
Minimum yard requirements are as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than 10 feet, measured from the existing public right-
of-way street line or from any future public right-of-way street line as shown on any
Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than 5 feet. Side yards on
comer and reversed comer lots shall be not less than 10 feet from the existing street
line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways,
whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides,
except that where the lot is less than 50 feet wide, the yard need not exceed 20% of
the width of the lot.
(3) The rear yard shall be not less than 15 feet. In addition, the following standard shall
also apply:
(a) No lot shall have more than 55% of its net area covered with buildings or
structures.
(4) No structural encroachmems shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard without
approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance.
Automobile storage' space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
rev. 10/24/01 -36-
Neighborhood Park/Recreation Areas
Planning Areas 12, 19, 24, 29-A and 37
ParkZone
The following regulations shall apply in all Park Zones:
SECTION 8.100. USES PERMITTED.
The following uses shall be permitted provided approval of a plot plan shall first have been
obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 .
(1991):
(1) Public parks and private recreation facilities.
(2) Golf courses and appurtenant facilities, including clubhouses. A clubhouse is
permitted to have customary retail shop and restaurant facilities:
(3) Noncommercial community association recreation and assembly buildings and
facilities.
(4) Lakes, including noncommercial fishing therefirom.
(5) Pieuic grounds.
(6) Parking lots, only for above-listed permitted uses, pursuant to the provisions of
Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991), except that not less
than five percent of the interior of such parking lots shall have distributed landscap-
ing in addition to the landscaping requirements of Section 18.12 of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
(7) Water wells an appurtenant facilities.
(8) On-site identification signs, maximum size - I0 square feet.
The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted:
(1) Riding academies and stables.
SECTION 8.101. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
Lot Area. This zone is to be applied to those areas within subdivisions and other residential
developments that provide open space and recreational area and facilities for the project.
Therefore, no minimum lot size is established for the zone.
Yards. Whenever a building is to be constructed on a lot in this zone, it shall have a front
yard, side yard and rear yard, each of which shall be not less than 25 feet. If more than one
building is consmacted on one lot, there shall be not less than a 20-foot separation between
the buildings. No structural encroachments shall be pennitted in the front, side or rear yard
without approval of a setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance.
rev. 10/24/01 -37-
c. Trash Areas. All trash collection areas shall be enclosed with a solid fence or wall no less
than 6 feet high.
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
All buildings or structures shall not exceed 40 feet in height.
rev. 10/24/01 -38-
Community Open Space
Planmng Area 35
Community Open Space Zone
The following regulations shall apply in all Community Open Space Zones:
SECTION 8.100. USES PERMITTED.
The following uses shall be permitted provided approval of a plot plan shall first have been
obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.30 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348
(1991):
(1) Undeveloped and manufactured open space.
(2) Golf courses and appurtenant facilities, including clubhouses. A clubhouse is
permitted to have customary retail shop and restaurant facilities.
(3) Noncommercial community association recreation and assembly buildings and
facilities.
(4) Lakes, including noncommercial fishing therefrom.
(5) Picnic grounds.
(6) Parking lots, only for above-listed permitted uses, pursuant to the provisions of
Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (1991), except that not less
than five percent of the interior of such parking lots shall have distributed landscap-
ing in addition to the landscaping requirements of Section 18.12 of Riverside County
ordinance No. 348 (1991).
(7) Water wells an appurtenant facilities.
(8) On-site identification signs, maximum size - l0 square feet.
bo
The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted:
(1) Riding academies and stables.
SECTION 8.101. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
Lot Area. This zone is to be applied to those areas within subdivisions and other residential
developments that provide open space and recreational area and facilities for the project.
Therefore, no minimum lot size is established for the zone.
b°
Yards. Whenever a building is to be constructed on a lot in this zone, it shall have a from
yard, side yard and rear yard, each of which shall be not less 'than 50 feet. If more than one
building is constructed on one lot, there shall be not less than a 20-foot separation belween
the buildings. No structural encroachments shall be permitted in the front, side or rear yard'
except without approval cfa setback adjustment pursuant to City Ordinance.
rev. 10/24/01 -39-
Trash Areas. All trash collection areas shall be enclosed with a solid fence or wall no less
than 6 feet high..
Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 348 (1991).
All buildings or structures shall not exceed 50 feet in height.
rev. 10/24/01 -40-
Commercial Office/Neighborhood Commercial
Planning Area 38
Commercial Office/Neighborhood Commercial Zone
The following regulations shall apply in all Commercial Office/Neighborhood Commercial
Zones:
SECTION 9.1
USES PERMITTED.
(1)
· (6)
(7)
(11)(6)
02)(7)
(13)~
(14)'9~
(:S)(lO)
The following uses are permitted, only in enclosed buildings with not more than 2,000
square feet of outside storage or display of materials appurtenant to such use and other
than as delineated below and outdoor seating for restaurants, employee eating and casual
dining, provided a Development Plan is approved. Antique shops.
Art supply shops and studios.
Art and fine art sales.
Banks and financial institutions with walk-up ~ ;,iw-~v teller or ATM.
Barber and beauty shops.·
Baseball ticket, card and logo merchandise mores.
Beauty aid/supply and/or health stores.
Bio-medical buildings.
Blind and window cover stores.
. Blueprint and duplicating services, copy shops or 24-hour copy and business
service stores.
(17)(1 l) Book stores and binders.
(l~) ..........
(2,9)(12) 'Carpet or floor covering stores.
- - -. . Cellular phone stores Mfii ~,~--" alto.
..... .. Check cashing centers.
.... . . Child learning centers or day care centers with outdoor play yard.
(22)(13)
(23)(14)
(24)(15)
(26)(16)
(27)(17)
.... . Civic and government uses including post office and library uses.
..... . Cleaning and dying shops.
(2g)(18) Coffee houses wi~h ,xiid without drive tilrough facilities.
(29)(19) Congregate care facility.
rev. 10/24/01 41-
(30)
(30
(32)(20)
(33)(2D
(34)
(35)(22)
(3¢)(23)
(37)(24)
(38)(25)
(3~)(26)
(4])
(42)(27).
(43)(28)
(44)
(45)(29)
(46)
(47)(30)
(4g)(31)
(50)(32)
(51)(33)
(52)(34)
(53)(35)
(55)(36)
(56)(37)
.(~)(38)
(62)
(63)(40)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(6g)(42)
(69)(43)
(7~)~)
(70(45)
Delicatessem.
Den~ o~ces.
. Donut shops.
. Emergency c~e m~icfl ficilifies.
. Emplo~ent agencies.
Express delive~ collection poin~ ~d s~pp~g facilities.
. F~ly ~ cent~.
. Fimess club (~clud~g 24-ho~ operation) ~ outdoor recreation facilities
such ~ b~ketb~l, volleybfll, te~s or s~g.
. Fr~e, le~ or eye gl~s ~ores.
G~den offi~.
. Go~eq~pment ~o~s.
. He~ cent,s, or s~l~ perso~ se~ice esmblis~enm, not to exceed 17,5~0
35,000 sq~e feet.
Ho~ehold goods s~es, includ~g but not limited to, new ~d ~ed appli~ees,
~e, c~ets, ~apefies~ lmps, radios ~d television sets, includ~g rep~
~ereof.
. Hotel lod~g facilities.
. Ice crem, yo~, ~ozen yo~ or j~ce shops.
. Ice s~es, not ~clud~g ice pl~B.
. htedor decom~g shops ~d offices.
Laboratories, fi~, den~, me~c~, res~ch or testing.
. Li~g Stores.
Lo~ ~o~s.
M~I order or ~t~et b~esses.
. Medi~ ~d c~opracfic offices.
Music~ ins~enB stores.
N~I ~d m~c~ sto~s.
Newsmds.
. Notion, novel~ or tabletop stores.
rev. 10/24/01 -42-
(74)(46)
(75)
(76)(47)
(77)(48)
(78)(49)
(79)(50)
(gC,)(51)
(g4)(S4)
(9O)(59)
(91)(60)
(92)(61)
(93)(62)
(94)(63)
. Offices, including business, law, medical, dental, chiropractic, architectural,
engineering, community planning and real estate.
N~oh:g h,~mc.
. Office park management and leasing offices. ·
. Office supplies including home office service mores.
. Paint and wallpaper stores, not to exceed 20,000 square feet.
. Party supply stores.
Patio furniture stores.
. Photography shops and studios and photo engraving.
. Pizza eat-in, take-out or delivery stores.
Postal annex stores.
. Printer or publishers.
. Radio and television broadcasting studios.
. Recording studios.
. Refreshments stands with outdoor seating.
. Restaurants and other eating establishments, including those serving beer, wine
or alcohol and with outdoor seating.
· Schools, business and professional, including art, barber, beauty, dance, drama,
karate, martial arts, music and swimming.
. Shoe repair shops including incidental sale of shoes.
Shoeshine stands.
· Shopping center management and leasing offices.
. Sign shops including instant signs and on-site advertising and sponsorship.
. Speaker stores, including small appliances.
. Stained glass assembly or ceramic painting stores.
Stationery stores.
(99~68~ Suntanning stores.
(100'(69)Supplemental, diet or weight loss stores.
(I 02)(70)Tailor shops.
(I $3)(71)Telemarketing offices.
(I 06)(72)Tobacco shops.
~ ~,,o.n 73)Travel agencies.
(109) T ......... '
(I 1 O,)(74)Typewdter and computer sales and rental, including incidental repaks.
(111) U:~i,¢,si,?' cxt¢:i~ioii schools.
( 112)(75)Vending machines
il 13)(76)Vitamin shops.
rev. 10/24/01 -43-
(I 14)(77)Watch repair shops.
The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted
pursuant to City Ordinance.
(1)
(1)
(2)
(2)
(3)
(3)
(4)
(4)
(5)
Assisted living facility.
Nursery schools for preschool day care.
Nursing homes.
Church and church-school facilities.
Universit~ extension schools.
Multifamily or mixed use multifaniily/commercial uses provided a Development Plan is
approved in accordance with the City of Temecula Development Code.
Any use that is not specifically listed in Subsections a., b. and c. may be considered a
permitted or conditionally permitted use provided that the Planning Director finds that the
proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the
designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process which governs the
category in which it falls.
SECTION 9.2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Planned Commercial
Developments are permitted provided a land division is approved pursuant to the provisions of
City or Temecula Ordinance No. 460 (1991).
SECTION 9.3 (DELETED)
SECTION 9.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following standards o{ developmem '
are required in the Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial Zones:
There is no minimum lot area requirement,
for buildings ~***~s, ,~,, ,,~
zone, except as req~red for by ~e adopted P~oma del Sol Specific PI~ svcchfic
.... ~ '~ ~- -' ~e ~ont setback sh~l be me~ed ~om ~e existing public fi~t-of-
~.~ ~ ov~.~ v~ ~[ ,~. ~e rem setback sh~l be me~ed ~om ~e exis
rev. 10/24/01 44-
-C.
rear lot line or f~om any recorded alley or easemem; if the rear line adjoins a street, the
rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a fi.ont setback. Each side
setback shall be measured fi.om the side lot line, or from an existing adjacent public right-
f- t lin ........ '"- --' ...... ....... ' --' '-'- --- ' ...... '- -
All buildings and stmcture_s shall not exceed 70 forty-five (45) feet in height.
Automobile storage space shall be provided in accordance with the City of Temecula
Development Code. as required by Section 18.12 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348
(1991).
All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation
view at finish floor elevation to a minimum sight distance of 1,320 feet.
rev. 10/24/01 .-45-
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DECEMBER 17, 2001
A special meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:10
P.M., in the City Council Chambers of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
President Stone presiding.
ROLLCALL
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, and
Stone.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Appointment of President and Vice President for the Calendar Year 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1Entertain motions from the Board of Directors to appoint the President to preside
until the end of Calendar Year 2002.
1.2 Entertain motions from the Board of Directors to appoint the Vice President, who will
assume the duties of the President in the President's absence and hold this office
until the end of Calendar Year 2002.
MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to appoint Director Stone to serve as President for the
Calendar Year 2002. The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
MOTION: Director Roberts moved to appoint Director Pratt to serve as Vice President for the
Calendar Year 2002. The motion was seconded by Director Naggar and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No comments.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
Minutes.csd\121701 1
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:12 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, January 8, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers of Temecula, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.csd\121701 2
ITEM 2
A P P R OVAI..,~//.,/~ ~
CITY ATTORNEY 7" ~'//v'
DIRECTOR OF FINANC(= ~
CITY MANAGER ~ !"
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CiTY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
February 22, 2003
Assessment Engineering Contract
PREPARED BY:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Award a two-year contract in the amount of $20,000 for 2002 and up to $21,800 for 2003 to
MuniFinancial for providing Assessment Engineering Services.
DISCUSSION: On September 25, 2001, the City solicited Request for Proposals from
engineering firms for providing the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) with the
administration of assessment engineering services. The City received four (4) Requests for
Proposals, which were reviewed and ranked by a committee. Three firms judged to be the most
qualified were invited to make an oral presentation to a selection committee comprised of City staff.
After the presentations, the selection committee ranked MuniFinancial as the most qualified firm that
would provide the highest quality services. MuniFinancial is a local firm and has been providing
TCSD with assessment services since 1991.
Staff has negotiated with MuniFinancial a contract with the final Scope of Work, which includes
preparation of the annual levy report, public notices, maintenance of the parcel database and year
round staff support. The fees, as stated in the proposal, are $20,000 for the calendar year 2002
services and up to $21,800 for calendar year in 2003. The fee for 2003 will vary and be based on
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for calendar year 2002. Due to City budget process and Riverside
County assessment process deadlines which start in January and ends in December, it is practical
to keep this contract on a calendar year basis. At the end of 2003, this contract may be extended
for two (2) one calendar year extensions.
FISCAL IMPACT: Total cost of the Assessment Engineering is $20,000 for calendar year
2002 and up to $21,800 for calendar year 2003. This amount is budgeted and approved in the
City's Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. Future amounts will be budgeted in the
appropriate year's Annual Operating Budget.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of January 1,2002, between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and MuniFinancial ("Consultant"). In consideration of
the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2002, and shall
remain and continue in effect until December 31, 2003, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement. The City reserves the option to extend the contract(s) under the same
terms and conditions for a maximum of 2 additional one-year terms per the attached pricing
schedule in "Exhibit B".
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
professionally, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally
accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are
required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant quarterly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and
the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment
are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for the
calendar year 2002, the amount for the succeeding year will be subject to an increase which will not
exceed 10% of previous year.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement, which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services.
c. Consultant will submit invoices quarterly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each quarter, for services
provided in the current quarter. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
R.:~smithb~2002 Ass Eng Conb"act,doc January 3, 2002
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. IftheCitysuspendsorterminates
a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its
designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and
audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of
three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and
may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
City's reuse of such materials on any project other than the project which is the subject of this
Agreement shall be at the City's sole risk. With respect to computer files containing data generated
for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the
City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
R:~smi~hb~2002 Ass Eng Contract.doc January 3, 2002
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert
witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, designated agents and
employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions
arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commemial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to
the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
WorkeCs Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
(4)
Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either
the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
projectJlocation or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
(4)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
R:Xamithb~2002 Ass En[ Contract.doc January 3, 2002
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a
bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses. The City agrees that Consultant's professional liability insurance may include a
deductible of $150,000 through the term of this Agreement, without guarantee or bond.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the DIIowing provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party, except after
thirty (30) days' prior written notice by mail has been given to the City,
ten (10) days if cancellation is due to nonpayment of premium.
Consultant shall give City thirty (30) days prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested of any policy being
suspended, voided, or reduced in coverage or limits.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to complywith these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the Ci~s forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
R:\smithb\2002 Ass Eng Contract.doc January 3. 2002
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are
in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. ' LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure
of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, headng or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to previde City with the opportunity to
review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review
any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
I~.:~mithb~002 Ass Eng Contract,doc Janua~ 3, 2002
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
MuniFinancial
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590-3661
Attention: Jim McGuire
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without pdor wdtten consent of the
City Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for
actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise
agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
'16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.
17. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee ofthe City of Temecula
shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the
Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year
thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of
the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise,
in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this
project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered
whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are
merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
R:Xsrnithb~2002 A~s Eng Contract,doc Januai'y 3, 2002
'19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
R:~smithb~2002 Ass £ng ConU'act.doc Janua~/3, 2002
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffery E. Stone, President
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
MuniFinancial
Attn: Jim McGuire
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590-3661
(909) 599..3990
Name: Michael McNamara
Title:
Vice President
Name: Paul whitelaw
Title: Vice President
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
R:%mithb~2002 Ass Eh8 Contract.doc JanuaPJ 3, 2002
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ASSEMSSMENT
ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
SPECIFICATIONS/SCOPE OF WORK
EXHIBIT "A"
1. Coordination with the City, County of Riverside and other entities to obtain all information
needed to provide the services requested, such as assessor's parcel maps, assessor's files,
copies of secured roils, boundary maps, budget information, historical data, etc.
2. Review existing method of spread to address staff concerns and to ensure equity throughout
the District.
3. Consultant will research parcel and land use changes, and maintain communication with
TCSD on changes in District as well as regulatory changes.
Coordinate with the City's Franchise Waste Hauler to insure that all parcels are included and
reconciled to Service Level D. Confirm with the TCSD the addition of new residential areas
for streetlight and landscape maintenance services.
Assist with and attend public meetings and workshops prior to any public hearings, to
discuss the District services, budgets, and any concerns generated by property owners in
order to alleviate any negative misconceptions, if so desired by TCSD.
Ability to assist TCSD staff in preparing budgets by providing a preliminary EDU count in
January and the preliminary levy report in early April of each year. Provide comparison
studies as requested by staff to aid in the analysis of various methods of assessment,
benefit to equity evaluations, EDU calculations and rates.
Prepare Preliminary Report for review by staff and modify as directed, This includes but is
not limited to: method of spread; description of the district and service levels; budget and
levy summary; district services and charges; changes and modifications to the district;
district budgets and method of apportionment,
8. Prepare final report for presentation by staff to the Board of Directors and provide approved
final levy database report.
9. Prepare, print and mail public hearing notices and explanatory information in conjunction
with adoption of the rates and charges.
10. Prepare and submit to the appropriate County department, by County deadline, a magnetic
tape, or other media that is compatible with the County, for its use in entering individual
parcel levy amounts onto the tax bill, included with the enabling resolution.
11. Prepare for City staff required correspondence, ie: including but not limited to Compliance
with Proposition 218, Authorized Signature to Request Changes to the Tax Roil and
Correction of Fixed Charges letter required as by the County, and Declaration of Mailing of
Public Notices.
R:Xsrnithb~2002 Ass Eng Contract,doc January 3, 2002
12. Upon receipt of a parcel exceptions list from the County, revise parcel numbers and report
the remaining levy amounts to the County Assessor's Office.
13. Make all necessary adjustments for annexations into the Distdct upon notification by the
TCSD.
14. Provide computer printout and CD to staff listing the "Noticed" levy amounts for each
assessor's parcel number and information requested by TCSD including acreage; land use
codes; TCSD Service Levels; number of dwelling units; EDU values; situs address; track
number and owner information.
15. Provide all the same services as called out in this agreement for areas which may at some
time in the future be annexed into the City. Any significant change to the District structure or
to the parcels included within the District, including annexations to the City, may result in
additional fees. These additional fees will be addressed in an amendment to this contract or
a separate agreement.
16. Reconcile Service Levels B, C, D and R with the number of parcels being assessed.
17.
Assist, as necessary, with the election process, including preparation of the annexation
Report. Any significant change to the Distdct structure orto the parcels included within the
District, may result in additional fees. These additional fees will be addressed in an
amendment to this contract or a separate agreement.
18. Assist with appeals procedure and make necessary revisions to the database as directed by
City staff.
19.
Assist TCSD, as necessary, in addressing property owners or residents with questions about
TCSD charges on property tax bills, noticing procedures, assessment districts and other
related issues.
P,:~smithb',2002 Ass Eh§ Cona'act.doc January 3.2002
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
The following fixed fees and schedule of quarterly payments shall be in effect for the scope of
services as set forth in Sections 2 and 4 of the Agreement, (The CPI adjustment will be based the
rates for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside and San Bernardino areas on a calendar year basis.)
2002 Amount 2003 Amount
January $ 4,500.00
December $4,500.00 + CPI Adjustment
March
$ 4,500.00 March
$4,500.00 + CPI Adjustment
June
$ 4,500.00 June
$4,500.00 + CPI Adjustment
September ~ 4,500.00
September $4,500.00 + CPI Adjustment
Quarterly Services $18.000.00
$18.000.00 + CPi Adiustment
Contingency (For
CPI Adjustment) $ 0
$1,800.00
Reimbursable Exp
(Not to Exceed)
$ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
2002 Contract Total
2003 Total ~
(Approximate, based on CPI Adjustment)
Reimbursable Expenses
The reasonable cost of reports, reproduction, County data tapes, assessor's parcel information and
other "out of pocket" expenses provided by the consultant are included in this contract in the
$2,000.00 per year reimbursable expenses listed above.
Reimbursable expenses not included under this contract are: coordination, production, postage and
mailing of resident notices. TCSD will reimburse consultant, under separate purchase order, for
previously approved costs associated with these services, including processing, reproductions,
materials, and service charges incurred by the consultant. In addition, the consultant will be
reimbursed for coordination and management of the mailing process at an amount not to exceed
$0.10 per notice mailed. TCSD shall provide postage costs, payable to the Consultant or
Postmaster, within seven (7) days prior to mailing.
R:~sraithb~2002 Ass En~ Contract.doc Januanj 3, 2002
DISTRICT BUSINESS
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY 1'-wv''
FINANCE DIRECTOR~____~
CITY MANAGER /-.,~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
January 22, 2002
Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan
PREPARED BY:
Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
Master Plan.
That the Board of Directors approve the Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways
BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2000, the Board of Directors awarded a contract to
KTU+A for the preparation of the Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. The purpose of the
master plan is to provide a comprehensive guide for planning, developing and implementing a safe
and efficient trails system including both off road trails and on road bikeways. This comprehensive
document would be implemented over several years.
A Trails Advisory Committee was formed which included Councilmember Naggar, Community
Services Commissioners Henz and Hogan, trail advocates, city staff and other interested parties.
The advisory committee worked with the consultants to identify potential trail users, proposed routes,
helped with the creation of the questionnaire and reviewed the work product at various stages of
development.
In order to ascertain multi-use trail and bikeway needs throughout the community, over 24,000
surveys were mailed to Temecula residents and the survey was also made available on the City's
web site. The response to the survey was tremendous. KTU+A received over 700 completed
surveys in the mail and 120 surveys returned via the Internet. The results of the survey provided
direction to the Consultants and formed the foundation of the needs analysis. These needs were
further defined with two (2) Community Workshops held in September and October 2000.
With a distinct knowledge of what the community wanted, Mike Singleton and John Holloway,
principals of KTU+A, spent many days in Temecula researching current trails, their conditions,
possible connections, constraints, etc. During this time they also researched use of utility
easements, liability issues and funding possibilities.
The initial draft master plan was provided to staff in mid July 2001. After staff reviewed and
commented on this draft, another revised draft master plan was submitted to the Trails Advisory
Committee for review and comment.
R:",McCarthC',Agenda Reports'dvlulti-Use Trails Master Plan.doc
The Master Plan was presented to the Community Services Commission on December 10, 2001.
Representatives of the Meadowview Homeowners Association expressed their desire to exclude
their trails in our master plan document. They want their private trails to remain for the exclusive use
of their residents who fund the trails. The Community Services Commission approved the Master
Plan and forwarded it to the Board of Directors with the stipulation that all Meadowview trails be
deleted. Due to a similar request by Roripaugh Hills Homeowners Association after the commission
meeting, trails owned and maintained by Roripaugh Hills were also deleted. These changes were
made and alternate routes and connections were established.
This final draft of the Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan includes design and construction
guidelines, with safety considerations and typical cross sections. Also incorporated in detail are
potential funding sources, constraints and connectivity of current and potential trails. The Master
Plan prioritizes specific trail segments, provides construction cost estimates, recommends signage
and interpretative opportunities and addresses maintenance concerns.
FISCAL IMPACT: Multi-use trail segments will be identified and improvements funded in the
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process. Maintenance of the trails system will be funded in the
appropriate operating budget.
ATrACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Executive Summary
Attachment 2 - Selected pages from the Master Plan
Attachment 3 - Letter of Support
R:'uMcCarthC~Agenda Reports'vMulti-Use Trails Master Plan.doc
Attachment I
~/' Chapter One "An interconnected system of pathways and bike
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY routes is needed to support a variety of recre-
I.I Project Background and Goals
The trail experience is becoming increasingly de-
sirable, whether the trail users ride bicycles or
horses, run, walk or birdwatch. Recent surveys
have shown that homeowners along trails expe-
rience less crime and have actually experienced
disproportionate increases in property values
compared to their neighbors whose properties
are not adjacent to the trail system. (Discovery
Hills, San Marcos, California)
This multi-use trail and bikeway master plan is
intended to guide trail and bicycle facility plan-
ning for the City of Temecula.The process included
evaluating existing and proposed trail routes and
on-street bicycle facilities using conventional field
techniques, computerized geographic information
systems analysis, community meetings and both
mail-in andWeb-based survey questionnaires.The
plan recommends revisions to existing facilities,
construction of new facilities and an implementa-
tion program. The plan also includes general and
specific design and engineering guidelines for the
development of these facilities.
The City of Temecula surveyed its residents in
1991 to determine their desires in the way of
City services and to set priorities. Residents ex-
pressed strong interest in a well-defined trail sys-
tem that would serve several functions:
· Access key destinations within the City and
region
· Serve as both recreation and transportation
routes
· Connect neighborhoods to parks, schools, em-
ployment and commercial areas
· Form loops that follow creeks and utility ease-
ments wherever feasible
Based on the 1991 survey results, continued
strong community support and the desired func-
tions listed above, the following primary project
goal was developed:
ational uses and non-motorized transportation
requirements forTemecula residents."
"This system should be community-wide and
should connect a variety of community and re-
gional destinations (such as schools, parks and
other areas of interest) and should utilize open
space corridors, flood control channels, utility
easements, publicly owned lands and roadways
most appropriate for non-motorized uses."
"Trails and bike routes should be provided to
improve the quality of life for residents of
Temecula, offer transportation alternatives,accom-
modate recreational enjoyment and increase the
value and connectiveness of the community."
The scenicTemeculaValley area is well suited to outdoor
recreational activities.
1.2 Project Scope
The master plan process evaluated the
community's need for a city-wide multi-use trail
system. The community's needs analysis included
workshops, survey questionnaires and evaluation
of potential for connectivity to planned County
and regional trail systems. All potential trails
segments and all roadway segments with an
existing bicycle facility were personally inventoried
at least once by the project team, either on foot
or by bike.
Executive Summary
............. City of Temecula
The master plan process explored all the oppor- mum) to accommodate multiple user types and
tunities and constraints of the proposed trail and
trail-related facilities, including topography, land
use, general plan, specific plan, flood plain, owner-
ship and liability considerations.
1.3 Opportunities and Constraints
The City of Temecula is unusually blessed with a
number of potential trail alignments. Among the
reasons for this are the City's history as an eques-
trian community that provided for trails in the
past, the numerous regional utility easements run-
ning through the City limits and the creek corri-
dors that border the City on three sides.
Temecula currently has a few Class I bicycle
routes and some similar trails, but the potential
exists for creating a Class I bike route and trail
system throughout the city. (See Figures 7- I and
7-5, Proposed Trail System and Proposed On-
Street Bikeways.) Since Temecula already has an
extensive Class 2 system, most of the new bikeway
routes shown on the maps are Class I routes
and multi-use unpaved trails. This reflects the de-
sires of the City and residents for more routes
away from roadways and includes both paved and
unpaved facilities.
Opportunities exist for the installation of several
Class I type off-street paved facilities that would
not only provide the relaxed recreational atmo-
sphere associated with off-street facilities, but
would also improve commuter connections. Nor-
mally, Class 2 facilities are preferred for transporta-
tion or commuting purposes. However, if no road-
ways exist through a relatively large area, Class I
type facilities will be useful to commuters.Together,
these facilities would fill in many of the gaps in
the current system where topography and lack
of facilities currently limit access.
Wherever possible, the proposed Class I type
routes would be paved paths officially designated
as Class I routes, and designed for multipurpose
use versus the generally unpaved surface treat-
ment endorsed for most informal trail facilities.
The paths should be wide enough (12 feet mini-
should include an unpaved side path (2 to 4 feet)
for users who prefer a softer trail. Paving is rec-
ommended for these specific routes within the
context of the overall trail system to maximize
their value for recreational and transportational
cycling throughout Temecula.
A major opportunity for Class I bikeway facility
and multi-use trail development is the creek chan-
nels running through the City of Temecula. The
creeks provide an opportunity for an extensive
scenic recreational trail system that could also
~rovide more direct bicycle transportation access
than is now possible around Temecula. The natu-
rally gentle grades of the creek corridors are ideal
for trail development. A recommendation is made
to include rest stops at scenic points along the
creeks within Temecula and would be equipped
with a number of amenities for cyclists, pedestri-
ans and equestrians.
The City of Temecula has an almost complete sys-
tem of Class 2 bikeways along its major road-
ways, and plans to install Class 2 facilities on the
as-yet unbuilt roadways as well. Implementation
of the programmed major roadways will provide
greater choice in Class 2 routes between rela-
tively isolated sections of Temecula. Full implemen-
tation of the programmed Class 2 facilities would
~rovide a relatively complete Class 2 system.
There are scattered existing trail segments inTemecula,
such as this one along Murrieta Creek, but numerous
~otential routes exist throughout the City.
Page I-2 Chapter
Multi-UseTrails and Bikeways Master Plan
A general improvement to the Class 2 facilities is
the provision of more roadway width on freeway
and creek bridges and underpasses. It is common
for bikeway facilities to end prior to where the
roadway crosses a bridge and to have the curb
pinch inward, eliminating the previously available
space for cyclists. In addition, bridges often have
excessively high curbs that could potentially catch
a cyclist's pedals, especially if the cyclist was
attempting to stay far to the right to avoid the
motor vehicles on a narrow bridge. In general,
there are a number of solutions short of the ideal,
which would be to actually widen the bridges. In
some cases, the lanes could be restriped or the
sidewalk width decreased if local, state and federal
standards can be met. In other situations where
high motor vehicle volumes and limited width
create particularly difficult cycling situations,
alternative routes could be provided.
Several problems consistently constrain non-mo-
torized use inTemecula. The most common con-
straints result from narrow bridges, lack of cross-
ings over barriers such as highways and creeks,
and topography. Especially in the east central por-
tions of the city, there are some long and some-
times steep grades. Also, many of Temecula's ex-
isting Class 2 roadways have relatively high posted
motor vehicle speeds. Experienced cyclisls are
generally not concerned with adjacent motor
vehicle speeds, especially when they can rely on
the relative safety of their own lane. However, less
experienced cyclists are more likely to find such
conditions uncomfortable and are therefore less
likely to use these roadways.
Finally, site-specific problems encountered in
Temecula are not numerous, but a few locations
have conditions detrimental enough to a safe bi-
cycle facility system to warrant special attention.
Though the vast majority of intersections do not
pose a threat to competent cyclists in Temecula,
one was singled out as particularly difficult for
cyclists to negotiate; the Rancho California Road
interchange at I- 15. Personal field experience and
questionnaire responses make it clear this loca-
tion poses special challenges,even for experienced
cyclists. From a cycling viewpoint, the problem
with this location is the intersection layout with
heavy motor vehicle traffic making numerous types
of merging movements, including dual on-ramp
lanes. It is a decidedly unpleasant place to be for a
cyclist at most times of the day, but especially so
during rush hour. The proposed bikeway system
would route cyclists away from this intersection.
1.4 Public Input
Public input has always been a hallmark of
Temecula's planning methods. Public input was
originally sought in 1991 via surveys and commu-
nity workshops concerning the citizen's desires
for City services. It was then that the demand for
non-motorized trails first arose and that citizen
input eventually became the springboard for this
trails and bikeways master plan.
The public input for this master plan included a
survey questionnaire mailed out to all residents
in the City as an insert in the City's quarterly
newsletter (approximately 24,000), the publish-
ing of the questionnaire on the City's official web
site,two community workshops and several meet-
ings with a Trails Advisory Committee made up
of City staff and officials, the consultant team and
trails advocates.
1.5 Conclusions
The study recommendations are intended to take
advantage of trail opportunities, programmed
roadways and bicycle facilities to resolve users'
concerns for connectivity and safety. Temecula has
only the beginnings of a multi-use trails system.
However, the sheer quantity of potentially avail-
able trail routes in Temecula makes it likely that
full construction of trails from the "ground up"
will not be required except in specific locations
where connectivity would be enhanced by such
construction. Existing dirt roads and "unofficial"
trails can be designated as trails to form the back-
bone of a comprehensive City system.
Chapter I Page I-3
Executive Summary ....................
.............................. City of Temecula
The City of Temecula has an almost complete
system of Class 2 bikeways along its major
roadways, and plans to install Class 2 facilities on
the as-yet unbuilt roadways as well.
Implementation of the programmed major
roadways will provide greater choice in Class 2
routes withinTemecula. Full implementation of the
programmed Class 2 facilities would provide a
relatively complete Class 2 system. However,
public meeting comments concerning loss of Class
2 facilities were common.
Short, but important, gaps in the bikeway system
now occur, especially across I- 15 where few cross-
ings occur and where they do occur, they are on
bridges with high motor vehicle traffic volumes
with a high number of turning movements. On
the approaches to the bridges over 1-15 and the
creeks, the Class 2 lane striping often simply dis-
appears, the roadway narrows going over the
bridge and the bike lane then reappears on the
far side of the bridges.
Temecula currently has just a few Class I facili-
ties, but the potential exists for creating a Class I
trail system throughout the City, along with an
unpaved system for which official Caltrans desig-
nation would not be sought. Since Temecula al-
ready has an extensive Class 2 system on its
streets, a still substantial amount of open land and
few Class I routes or designated trails, many of
the new bikeway routes are Class I along with a
proportional number of unpaved trails. The un-
paved multi-use trails are not intended to have
Caltrans Class I designation. Note that this mas-
ter plan combines Class I bikeways and other trail
types and shows them together on Figure 7-1,
Proposed Trail System. All on-street bike facilities
are shown on Figure 7-5, Proposed On-Street
Bikeways. This separation is a logical distinction
between the facility types since it divides on-street
and off-street facility types. In addition, it is rec-
ommended that whenever paved trails are
planned, that they be built to Caltrans Class I
bikeway specifications to be able to take advan-
tage of available bikeway funding.
Unless there are overriding circumstances, it is
generally inadvisable to designate specific trails
as either equestrian, bicycle or pedestrian facili-
ties since consistent enforcement is virtually im-
possible. Referring to all trails as "multi-use" fa-
cilities will probably be sufficient to advise users
that they should expect different types of users.
This should be the norm so that the City-wide
system will be as consistent as possible for the
benefit of all potential users. Where paved and
unpaved trails are necessary within the same align-
ment, they can be installed adjacent to each othen
Unless congestion reaches unacceptable levels,
mixed-use trails generally function quite well and
developing a single trail system is far more eco-
nomical in terms of capital costs and land than a
series of parallel trails. However, some commu-
nity workshop attendees did prefer separate fa-
cilities, primarily to separate bicycle use from
other user types, especially equestrians. If this
develops as a high priority, such separated trails
should be provided where feasible. It should also
be noted that other equestrian users felt that
mixed use trails were acceptable.
1.6 Primary Recommendations
The primary recommendation for this study is
the addition of a number of non-motorized un-
paved trails and paved Class I off-street routes
throughoutTemecula in a loop arrangement. User
questionnaire responses indicate there is a con-
siderable demand for this type of route.
The second primary recommendation is to pro-
vide improved connectivity via increased access
points across the creeks and 1-15. Though the
present conditions make crossing I- 15 fairly diffi-
cult, more crossings would help to alleviate the
connectivity issues between the east and west
sides of Temecula split by the freeway.
Page I-4 Chapter
Attachment 2
MURRIETA CREEK TRAIL CONDITIONS
City of Temecula Multi-use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan
FUTURE BRIDGES
Cherry Street
RanchoWay
~ S~eet
We:stem Bypass
EXISTING BRIDGES
~ *' ~ Main Street I(~ First Street
Museum ~ ·. ,. ~: ..... -
Segment Trail Type
M I,M2,M3,M4:
1,4,6,9,12,13,15,16,17
BI: 2,3,5,7,14
B2,/B3: 8, 10, II
(See Figures 2-4 to 2-7)
Creek or channel crossing requiring I:~dge or trail
diversion around obstacle ·
Potential creek crossing points (Z)
Potential points of historic interest
~uaip~e p~ rou~es
Chapter 7 Page 7-9
PROPOSED
City of Temecula
ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
Multi-use
Trails and Bikeways
Master Plan
EXISTING Trail Type
Class 2 (Bike Lane) m B2
Class 3 (Bike Route) .......... B3
PROPOSED
Class 2 (Bike Lane) --- B2
Class 3 (Bike Route) ...... B3
Chapter 7 Page 7- I I
PROPOSED TRAIL CIP SEGMENTS IFigure[~
City of Temecula Multi-use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan
*Does not include on-street bicycle facilities.
~.. ...................... ..~.. .......... .,~
...?::.. ........ .... ~.? ~--
/
ExistlngTrails ~
Proposed Trails -.~
Out of Jurisdiction · ·.,
Trail Segments O
Chapter' 8 Page 8-3
Implementation City of Temecula
a M4 17.820
b MI 25,740
c M4 2,244
d M4 2.640
e M3 2,508
f H I 4,620
~ M3 6,732 128 Temecula Creek from Temecula Can~on to Pala Road $469.129
a M3 8,646 I 64 North side of Temecula Creek from Pala Road to Margarita Road $602.509
b M I 17,028 323 South side of Temecula Creek from Pala Road to eastern City limit $623,225
c M I I,S 18 029 Along Murfield Drive between Pala Road and Temecula Creek $53.559
d M I 2,640 050 Along Jedediab Smith Road between Temecula Creek and Loma Linda Road $96,624
] a MI 9,372 I 78 Aiong Pechanga Creek between Temecula Creek and Wolf Valley Road
b
2 40 Utility easement between ?ala Road and Rancho California Road $810,714
050 Connection between utility easement and Pauba Road $183,972
0.75 East/west trail across 5ports Park $253,348
0 88 Utility easement between Pauba Road and Rancho Cahfornia Road $295,573
a M I 9,768
b M I 4,224
c M2 4,224
d M4 4,7S2
] a
a 4.224 080 Out of jurisdiction: Southe~.st of City
b 2.640 0 $0 Out of jurisdiction: Southeast of City
c 10,560 200 Out of jurisdiction: Southeast of City
] a MI 1,980 0.38 Along north side ol North General Kearney Road west of Calle Pina Coiada
b M I 1,914 0 36 Along south side of North General Kearney Road between Cage Pina Colada and Margarita Road
a Mg 6,600 125 Along Nicolas Road between utility easement and current east end of Santa Gerb-udis Creek trail
b M I 6,600 1.25 Along Enfleld Lane and Amberley Circle between utdlity easement and 5e~ne~t 13c
c MI 9,715 184 Along Calle Medusa and cross-countr~ to Via Lob:) and along utility easement to Nicolas Road
Page 8-4 Chapter 8
Attachment 3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Regional Park And Open-Space District
4600 Crestmo~ Road * ~lverside, CA 92509-6858 * (909) 9~5-4310
F~ (909) 9~5-4~05
PAUL F~NDSEN
General Manager
October 23, 2001
Temecula City Coancil
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Ca. 92590
RE: Multi-Uae Traib & Bikeways Master Plan
Honorable Council members:
As Chaff of the County Trails Committee, as well as a recent Governor's Appointee to the State
Trails Committee, and longtime Trails Advocate, I want to express my highest degree of compli-
ments to your S~aff, KTUA and Committee members for what 1 believe to be the most comprehen-
sive and complete Trails Master Plan, this side of East Bay Regional Park District.
Together they have done an excellent job in addressing the many components ora Trails Plan,
including prioritizing implementation. I was particularly impressed with their Legal Citations,
including California Property Owners Recreational Use hnmunity (846) and the California Public
Resources Code (5070-5077.8)
I was even more impressed with their citations on "Trail Liabilities and Immunities" complete with
recent case law
This is a good plan that will serve the City for a long time. It was my pleasure to participate.
Sincerely,
Jeannie Oillen, Chair
Riverside County Tails Committee
Riverside County Parks Commission
i~l State of California
~ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Jeannie Gillen
California Recrealional Trail Committee Member
California State Parks
P.O, Box 942896
Sacramento, CA 94296.0001
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR__~_
CITY MANAGER ' ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services~
January 22, 2002
Teen Program
PREPARED BY:
Julie Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Community Services Commission:
Receive and file this report regarding the Temecula Teen Council and City sponsored teen
programs in Temecula.
DISCUSSION: In December of 1992, the City of Temecula officially formed the
Temecula Teen Council. The primary purpose of the Teen Council was to allow teen
representatives from each of the local schools the opportunity to assist in planning,
programming and implementing teen activities sponsored by the City. The City believes that if
local teens play an active role in determining the types of programs offered to them, program
participation will be of interest and that the greatest needs of the teen population will be
served.
The Teen Council meetings are conducted at the Temecula Community Recreation Center on
the first and third Thursday evening of each month from 6:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. The meetings
are open to the public and all teens are encouraged to attend. Senior Recreation Leader, Suzie
McVey attends each meeting for the primary purpose of encouraging active participation and
to provide guidance to the Teen Council.
Throughout this past year, the Teen Council has actively planned, programmed and
implemented special events and programs at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, as
well as at other off-site facilities. Senior Recreation Leader Suzie McVey and several members
of the Temecula Teen Council are here tonight to provide the City Counci~ with information
regarding teen events and programs.
Attached are examples of the activities and special events that are currently being offered by
the Community Services Department through the dedication and efforts of the Temecula Teen
Council members.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Tap Dancing 12-18 Years
This class is designed for the beginning student or students that need to refresh
tap steps. Tap shoes are required.
Instructor: C. Rowley Location: Cathy's Dance
Beginning
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee Activity# Start Date
1026.101 Jan/ M 6:lS-/:00pm $00.00/0 wks 1420.101 Jan22
1026.102 Mar 4 M 6:lS-/:00pm 580.00/8 wks 1420.102 Feb 19
[ntermediate (2 gears e~perrenee required) 1420.100 Mar26
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee 1420.104 Aprl6
1027.101 Jan l M 6:00-6:45pm 580.00/8 wks 1420.105 May 14
1027.102 Mar 4 M 6:00-6:45pm 580.00/8 wks 1420.106 Jun 18
Kitchen Survival For Teens 12-18 Years
It's the millennium and survival in the kitchen isn't just about microwaving pizza!
In this class at the CRC, teens will learn to make favorite recipes and unusual
foods as they prepare and eat their own creations. Leftovers can be taken home,
bring your own containers. Instructor: Ci~C Staff Location: CRC Kitchen
Day Time Fee
T 4:00-5:30pm 56.00/class
T 4:00-5:30pm S6.00/dass
T 4:00-$:30pm S6.00/dass
T 4:00-5:30pm 56,00/class
T 4:O0-S:30pm S6.00/class
I 4:00-5:30pm 56.00/class
Hawaiian Tahitian Dance 13 Years - Adults
Polynesian dance instruction br fun and enjoyment( Come join us and learn the
graceful Hawaiian hula, t~e excitement of Tahiti and the fun of the Maori poi
balls. Costumes are available, but are optional. There is an $8.00 materials fee
due at the first class for poi balls, or you may make your own.
laslructats: A. Dankel Location: CRC
Beginners
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
1022.101 Jan 3 Th 6:00-6:50pm 535.00/8 wks
1022.102 Feb 28 Th 6:0O-6:5Opm 535.00/8 wks
1022.103 Apr 25 Th 6:00-6:50pm $35.00/8 wks
Intermediate
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
1048.101 Jan 2 W 5:00-5:50pm 535.00/8 wks
1048.102 Feb 21 W 5:00-5:50pm 535.00/8 wks
1048.103 Apr 24 W 5:00-5:50pm 535.00/8 wks
Advanced
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
1021.101 lan 3 Th 5:00-S:50pm 535.00/8 wks
1021.102 Feb 28 Th 5:O0-5:50pm 535.00/8 wks
1021.103 Apr 25 Th 5:00-5:50pm S35.00/8 wks
Oil Painting
13 Years-Adult
Want to learn how to paint in oil or acrylic? Now is the time to start. Work on
your own projects at your own pace with the guidance of an experienced
instructor. Gabriele will take you through the process step by step. You will learn
how to prepare your ideas and get them ready, how to transfer them to drawing
on canvas, blocking in, and an excellent opportunity for studio time for the
beginner and more advanced student alike. Supply list available.
Instructor. G. Baber Location:./CC
Activity# Start Date Day time Fee
0225.101 Jan 17 Th 9:00-11:30am S60.00/4 wks
0225.102 Feb 14 Th 9:00.1 l:3Oam 545.00/3 wks
0225.103 Mar21 Th 9:00-H:3Oam S60.00/4 wks
0225.104 Aprl8 Th 9:00-11:30am $60.00/4 wks
0225.105 May 16 Th 9:00-11:30am 560.00/4 wks
Scrap Book Making
12-18 Years
Come on down to the Teen Center where you can work on your scrapbook or
photo album with others who enjoy scrapping! You can share ideas and tools,
but all you really need to bring is your own book and pictures. We will provide
the rest and the best part of it is it's free!
lestructor. Oty Staff Location: CRC Teen Center
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
Continually Jan 8 T 3:30-5:30pm Free
Creative Art 12-18 Years
Teens will show their creative side as they explore several types of mediums in this
art class at the CRC Teen Room. We'll be using paints, glues, modeling clay and
more as we create some unusual projects, lash'oct0r. City Staff L0colJon: (0( Teen
Center
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
1412.101 Jan 24 Th 4:00-5:30pm $4.00/class
1412.102 Feb 21 lh 4:00-5:30pm S4.00/dass
1412.103 Mar28 Th 4:00-5:30pm S4.00/dass
1412.104 Apr 18 lh 4:00-5:30pm S4.O0/dass
1412.105 May 16 Th 4:00-5:30pm 54.00/dass
1412.106 Jan 20 Th 4:00-5:3Opm S4.00/class
Mystery Dinner 12-18 Years
Come by andsee what's br dinner as the Teen Center tries to unlock the mystery
and figure out "Who Done It?" Will you be able to put the clues together or will
you be taken by surprise? Worse yet, will it be you? This event is sure to be furl
of mystery, intrigue, surprises and fun. Instroctor:. Chy Staff Location:CRCleen Center
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
1012.101 Jan 26 S 5:00-8:00pm 55.00
Get Cultured and Taste the World ~ 12-18 Years
Join us as the Temecula Teen Council takes other Temecub Teens for a "tour"
around the world. One evening a month we will sample appetizers and music
from different cultures and countries. We will take a look at the average teen life,
cultural dress, customs and government of that month's country in focus. At the
end of each night we will have a round table discussion about how the foreign
teens compare to our own everydaylife. Instructar:GtyStaff Locatiom CRC Teen Center
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
1010.101 Jan9 W 5:30-1:30pm Free
1010.102 Feb6 W 5:304:30pm Free
1010.103 Mar !3 W 5:30-l:OOpm Free
1010.104 Apr lO W 5:30-1:30pm Free
1010.105 May~2 W 5:30-/:30tom Free
1010.106 Jun 26 W 5:30-1:30pm Free
Hip-Hop Classes
12-18 Years
We invite Temecula Teens to join us at the CRC Teen Center for some Free hip-hop
classes. This four-week class will be taught by a professional dance teacher who
will show you some basic dance moves and a complete choreographed dance.
So bring your friends down to the Teen Center so you can learn to dance the night
away. Please wear appropriate attire, no jeans. Instructor: P. Floate Locution: CRC Teen
Center
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
1011.101 Feb1 F 3:30-4:30pm Free
Everyday at the Teen Center
12-18 Years
EYeryday at the Teen Center, the CRC has activities just for you! All the oclivities
are free and we have something for everyone. So meet your friends at the Teen
Center for an afternoon and check us out!
Instructor: CRC St~ L0anti0n: CRC Teen Center
Date Day Activity Time Fee
Continuous Man's 8-Ball Tuurnomenl 3:30gm Free
Continuous Tue's Scrupbooh Making 3:300m Free
Cnnfinunus Wed's Movie Mnfinee 8:300m fcee
Continuous Fhu's Kumnke 6:00pm Free
Continuous FcFs TFN 6:00pm Free
TFN - Totally Friday Nights 12-18 Years
Join us at the CRC Teen Center every Friday for Totally Friday Nights. We have
weekly tournaments, karaoke, movies and more! It's something to do every week.
Teens can buy pizza for iust $2.00 and the fun begins al 6:00pm.
bstrnctor: CRC Staff Location: CRCTeen Center
Date Day Activity Time Fee
Continuous lstFridny PoalShorkFournament 6:O0-8:00pm Free
Continuous 2nd Friday Movie Hight 6:00-8:00pm Fcee
Continuous 3rd Friday Karaoke Night 6:00-8:00pm Free
Continuous 4th Friday N64Tnurnament 6:00-8:00pm Free
Spring Dance 12-18 Years
The Temecula Teen Council is hosling a Spring Dance at the Skate Park. The Skate
Park will be closed for skateboards and roller bladders. The event is open for oil
Temecub Teens and proof of residency is required at the door.
Instructor: City Staff Location: Temecub Skate Park
Activity# Date Day Time Fee
1016.~01 May 11 S 6:00-9:00pm S1.00
Co~: .lc Bowling ~ 12-18 Years
lYs bowling with o h,vist. The lights ore turned down and the pins and balls glow
as we listen to music. Meet at the CRC to be transported to the bowling center. If
you have not tried this yet you must come and see what ell the hype is all aboul.
Inslructor: City Staff Location: Pick-up and Drop-off at CRC
Activity# Dote Day Time Fee
1017.101 Apr 13 S 8:30pm-1:30am SlO.O0
Spring Break at the Teen Center 12-18 Years
During Spring Break the Teen Center is going to have lots of fun activities. We
will go to Magic Mountain, have a locbin and a band jam. The Teen Center will
be open from F 2:00 to 8:45pm during Spring Break so you can come on in and
hang out. We will have a PlayStation, N64, karaoke machine, big screen TV and
scrapbook making. So come join us for Spring Break 2002.
Instructor: City Stdf Location: CRC Teen Center
Activity# Date Dny Time [vent Fee
1018.101 MacI Th 8:00am-9:OOpm Magic MountainS5.00'
1018.102 Mar 13 W 8:00gm-9:OOum Loch-In S]O.O0
1018.103 Mar 11 Su 4:00-6:00pm Band Jam Free
*Cost of admission lo theme pork and food purchased on own
School's Out/Teen Pool Party 12-18 Years
Come down to the CRC pool starting this spring and once a month you can swim
with your friends while we have e DJ play music on deck. The pool will be open
for Temecuta Teens only and we will have games for prizes and the slide will be
open! Be sure fo bring your Temecula Valley School ID with you.
Instructor: City Staff Location: CRC Pool
Activity# Start Date Day Time Fee
1014.101 May 18 S 6:00-8:00pm 51.00 (TVUSD ID requiced)
1014.102 Jun 15 S 6:00-8:00pm ShOO (TVUSO 10 required)
1014.103 Jul 20 S 6:00-8:000m S1.00 (TVUSD ID required)
1014.104 Aug 17 S 6:00-8:000m $1.00 (TVUSO 10 required)
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services~,
January 22, 2002
Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary
On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi-Trail
System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the committee selected KTU& Associates
as the top ranked firm. The Board of Directors awarded a contract to KTU&A on March 28, 2000.
Staff has reviewed the first draft document and a draft copy has been mailed out to the committee in
for their comments. The Trails Master plan was presented to the Community Services Commission
on December 12, 2001 and forwarded to City Council with changes. Staff is presenting the Trails
Master Plan to the Board of Directors on tonight's agenda with those recommended changes.
Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of an aquatic facility to be
constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Directors approved a Scope of Services
Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one ranked firm, RJM Design Group. The
architect and project design committee has completed the schematic design of the project. The
Board of Directors approved the Master Plan on June 27, 2000, and awarded a contract to RJM
Design Group on July 11,2000, for the Phase II of the Design Contract. The City Council awarded
a contract to California Commercial Pools on July 10, 2001 and construction began on August 13,
2001. Both pools have been shotcreted and the tile has been installed.- The block work for the
building is nearly complete. The project is on schedule and staff anticipates construction will be
completed by early spring.
The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adopted at the September 26, 2000 City
Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and
specifications for the Temecula Public Library. Staff is resolving the final issue with the construction
documents and they will be submitted for final plan check. Staff released an RFQ for grant writing
services to apply for the California State Library's Bond Act 2000. A consultant was selected and
focus group interviews and a community workshop are scheduled for January 28 - 29, 2002.
Staff released an RFQ for the children's museum interior space planning, exhibit design, fabrication,
construction and installation. Interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on October 17, 2000.
Staff began negotiations with the top ranked firm, Sparks Exhibits and Environments. The
R:~ZIGLERG\XDE PTRPT~0102.doc
January 15, 2002
Agreement and Scope of Services was approved by the City Council on December 12, 2000. The
committee has been meeting and has proposed naming the facility "Imagination Workshop, The
Temecula Children's Museum". A staff report went forward to the Community Services Commission
on May 14, 2001, and they unanimously approved a recommendation to the City Council to name
the facility. The Design Committee has been working on a theme an interior design concept. A
committee meeting was held on October 11,2001. The Community Services Commission reviewed
the design concept for the project and recommended staff take the design concept forward to the
City Council. Staff will be bringing the design concept forward for approval by the City Council in the
next 30 to 60 days.
We met with RHA Landscape Architects regarding the improvements to Vail Ranch Park Site "C"
adjacent to Pauba Elementary School. This project is identified in this year's CIP. The new
amenities will include a tot lot, picnic shelter, tables, benches and walkways. We should have a
conceptual plan to present at the next Commission meeting.
The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects
within the City including Wolf Creek, Roripaugh, Villages of Old Town and Harveston, as well as
overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the contract for refuse and
recycling, cable television services and assessment administration.
The Maintenance Division recently completed a rehabilitation of the Temecula Community
Recreation Center which including interior/exterior painting of the facility, replastering of the pool,
including repairs to the waterslide and diving board, resurfacing of the gymnasium floor. The
Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of all parks and recreation facilities, as
well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance Division
assists in all aspects of Citywide special events.
The Recreation Division recently released the Winter/Spring 2002 Guide to Leisure Activities and is
receiving a great response to the programmed classes and activities. Additionally, the Recreation
Division is in the preliminary planning stages for upcoming holiday events including the Spring Egg
Hunt and the Annual 4th of July parade and fireworks extravaganza.
R:~ZIGLERG~XDEPTRPT~0102.doc
J~nua~ 15, 2002
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 17, 2001
A special meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:11
P.M., in the City Council Chambers of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Chairman Roberts presiding.
ROLLCALL
PRESENT: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pmtt,
Roberts, and Stone
ABSENT:
0 AGENCY MEMBER: None
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Appointment of Chairman and Vice Chairman for the Calendar Year 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Entertain motions from the Agency Members to appoint the President to preside until
the end of Calendar Year 2002.
1.2 Entertain motions from the Agency Members to appoint the Vice President, who will
assume the duties of the President in the President's absence, and hold this office
until the end of Calendar Year 2002.
MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to appoint Agency Member Roberts to serve as
President during the Calendar Year 2002. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Pratt.
(Ultimately this motion was withdrawn,)
Agency Member Roberts relayed his desire to concentrate on his position as Mayor during
2002.
Per Agency Roberts request, Agency Member Naggar withdrew his motion.
MOTION: Agency Member Pratt moved to appoint Agency Member Comerchero to serve as
President during the Calendar Year 2002. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone
and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to appoint Agency Member Naggar to serve as
Vice President during the Calendar Year 2002. The motion was seconded by Agency Member
Pratt and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
R:\Minutes.rda\121701
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:14 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, January 8, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Ron Robe,s. Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes.rda\121701
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER... ~
CiTY MANAGER ~ '
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Board of Directors
John Meyer, Redevelopment Director~/
January 22, 2002
Proposed Amendment to RDA Pass-Through Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: That the Temecula Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA No. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDE-
VELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROV-
ING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AMENDED AND
RESTATED AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY
OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
REIMBURSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX INCREMENT
FUNDS FROM THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT"
BACKGROUND: In June of 1988, the County Board of Supervisors for Riverside County
adopted Ordinance 658 approving the Temecula Redevelopment Plan. Shortly thereafter, Robert
Dawes and Save Historic Temecula, an unincorporated association filed a lawsuit objecting to the
formation of the plan. Subsequently, the City of Temecula incorporated and determined it was in its
best interest to take over the Redevelopment Plan as a City/Agency Plan. In June of 1991, a
Stipulated Judgment was reached between all parties and the Redevelopment Area/Agency was
declared valid.
As is common when redevelopment areas are formed, a pass-through agreement was established
to determine the manner in which all affected local taxing agencies would share in the distribution of
tax increment from the City's Redevelopment Project Area. These local taxing agencies include
Riverside County, Temecula RDA, local school district and special districts. Each agency receives a
set percentage of the tax increment. The percentage remains fixed but the allocation increases or
decreases as assessed property values increase or decrease. In California, property values are
assessed at one (1) percent of the sales price of the property. Therefore, valuation increases only if
a property is sold or improvements such as new construction or additions are made to the property.
The terms of our Agency's Agreement with the County provides the County a fixed amount of
increment each year in the amount of approximately $860,724. The balance deferred remains with
R:~RDA PASS THROUGH~DA Pass Through RDA Report.doc
the City. Over time, the allocations would shift with the City receiving a guaranteed minimum of $2.5
million and the balance going to the County to pay back the deferral with interest.
This arrangement was seen as advantageous because it "front loaded" the City with tax increment
thereby increasing its ability to sell bonds and raise capital to carry out redevelopment activities.
Unfortunately, neither the County nor the City anticipated the recession would result in decreased
property values. This decrease in revenue stream significantly impacted the process of paying back
the County deferral.
DISCUSSION: The terms of the agreement are complicated and difficult to administer. To
resolve this, staff from the City and the County agreed to amend the agreement in order for both
parties to better obtain the benefits ofthe redevelopment project. The City and County staffs have
formulated the following deal points:
1. Twenty Percent (20%) housing fund would be allocated from the gross increment -
consistent with California Redevelopment Law.
2. Agency provides $6 million payout to County and applies the $545,000 administration fee
to resolve the outstanding deferral.
3. County Agrees to reducing pass-through percentage from approximately 29% to 25%.
4. Agency will start paying administrative fee estimated at approximately $130,000 per year.
The Agency/City would contribute approximately $5 million dollars towards the acquisition of
right-of-way for the Date/Cherry interchange. Both City and County staff agree this is a
regionally significant public improvement. The contribution would allow the County to remain
financially whole between the existing pass-through percentage and the proposed pass-
through percentage.
ANALYSIS: Staff believes this agreement will provide significant benefits to the Agency. By
paying the $6 million to the County, and forgoing the $545,000 administration fee, the City'is making
a substantial up front payment to the County, with the balance to be paid over time through the
County administration fee. The reduction in the pass-through rate from 29% to 25% will offer the
Agency the ability to sell a second series of bonds. In addition, this amendment removes the cap on
net increment available to the Agency.
This amendment would stop the on-going accumulation of debt that could reach nearly $100 million
by the end of the life of the RDA in 2028. The amendment would establish a simpler formula for
projecting future revenue for both Agency and County and provide incentive to the Agency to pursue
redevelopment activities, resulting in higher future incrementJpass-through.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that a second series of bonds coupled with the refinancing of
the existing bonds would generate sufficient funding to cover the $6 million payout to the County.
The $5 million for the Date/Cherry interchange is currently funded within the 2002-2006 Capital
Improvement Program Budget.
ATTACHMENTS: RDA Pass-Through Agreement
Resolution RDA No. 2002
R:XRDA PASS THROUGFi%RDA Pass Through RDA Report.doc
RESOLUTION NO. RDA No. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDE-
VELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROV-
ING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AMENDED AND
RESTATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY
OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
REIMBURSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX INCREMENT
FUNDS FROM THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT"
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. On July 12, 1988, the County, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula,
duly adopted Ordinance No. 658 enacting a redevelopment plan, known as the "County of Riverside
Redevelopment Plan 1-1988" (the "Plan").
B. The City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989 and all of the
territory to which the Plan applies (the "Project Area") is now included within the corporate
boundaries of the City of Temecula.
C. On April 9, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council")
duly adopted Ordinance No. 91-14 activating the Agency and designating the City Council of the City
of Temecula to be the members of the Agency and Ordinance No. 91-15 adopting a redevelopment
plan, which ordinance had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan
from the County and the County Agency to the City and the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33215(a).
D. On April 9, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-38 which
resolution bound the City to reimburse the County's costs of transferring the Plan to the City
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33215(b).
E. The parties hereby acknowledge that the Agency has paid the County the
costs incurred by the County in transferring the Plan to the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33215(b) and the City's Resolution No. 91-38.
F. Following consultations between the Agency and representatives of the
County on behalf of the County General Fund, Structural Fire Protection Fund and Library Fund to
determine the fiscal impact of the Plan upon them, the County, the County Agency, CORAL, the City
and the Agency entered into an agreement entitled "Agreement Between the County of Riverside,
the Redevelopment Agency of the County of Riverside, County of Riverside Asset Leasing
Corporation, the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for
Reimbursement and Distribution of Tax Increment Funds from the Temecula Redevelopment
Project" dated as of May 14, 1991 (the "Agreement").
R:~DA PASS THROUGH~TRDA Resol Pass Through Agreement. DOC
(3. The Agreement was entered into to address the financial detriment caused by
the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan from the County and the County Agency to the City and the
Agency and was entered into pursuant to the authority of Health and Safety Code Sections 33215(e)
and 33401.
H. The Agency has consulted with representatives of the County and the County
Agency and has determined that there is a continued fiscal impact on the County and the County
Agency from the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan from the County and County Agency to the City
and the Agency.
I. The County, the County Agency, CORAL, the City and the Agency desire to
amend and restate the Agreement to assist the Agency in financing the Project Area, to address the
continued fiscal impact of the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan and to amicably resolve any
differences regarding the interpretation of the Agreement.
J. By approval of this Agreement, the parties hereto find and determine that
any financial effects relating to the Plan are alleviated by the terms of this Amended and Restated
Agreement.
K. The County, CORAL, and County Agency each agree and acknowledge that
the Agency and City are relying upon the representations and warranties of County, CORAL and
County Agency with respect to the matters set forth herein and particularly Section 8.
L. This Amended and Restated Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of
all parties to finance and carry out their statutory purposes and is intended to be a contract within the
meaning of Government Code Section 53511.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby approves in substantial conformance that certain agreement entitled "Amended and
Restated Agreement Between the County of Riverside, the Redevelopment Agency of the County of
Riverside, County of Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation, the City of Temecula and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for Reimbursement and Distribution of Tax
Increment Funds from the Temecula Redevelopment Project, with such changes in each document
as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties and the Agency Executive Director as are in
substantial conformance with the form of such Agreement which on file in the Office of the Agency
Secretary. The Chairperson of the Agency is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement, including
related exhibits and attachments on behalf of the Agency. A copy of the final Agreement when
executed by the Agency Chairperson shall be placed on file in the Office of the Secretary of the
Agency.
Section 3. The Executive Director of the Agency (or his designee), is hereby authorized,
on behalf of the Agency, to take all actions necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement
the Agreement and to administer the Agency's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be
performed under the Agreement and related documents.
Section 4. The Secretary of the Agency shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:'dLDA PASS THROUGHXTRDA Resol Pass Through Agreement. DOC
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED bythe Board of Directors of the Temecula Redevel-
opment Agency on this 22 day of January 2002.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, Secretary of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, do hereby
certify that the Resolution No. RDA 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22 day
of January 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
NOES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Secretary
R:kRDA PASS THROUGH~TRDA Resol Pass Through Agreement. DOC
AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE COUNTY
.OF RIVERSIDE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY
OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
REIMBURSEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS
FROM THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT (the "Amended and Restated
Agreement") is made and entered into this 22 day of January 2002, by and between the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ("Agency"), CITY OF TEMECULA
("City"), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ("County") and THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ("County Agency"). In consideration of their mutual promises and
covenants and the facts set forth herein, the parties do hereby agree as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. This Amended and Restated Agreement is made with respect
to the following facts and for the following purposes, which the parties hereto acknowledge as true
and correct:
A. On July 12, 1988, the County, prior to the incorporation of the City of
Temecula, duly adopted Ordinance No. 658 enacting a redevelopment plan, known as the "County
of Riverside Redevelopment Plan 1-1988" (the "Plan").
B. The City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989 and all of the
territory to which the Plan applies (the "Project Area") is now included within the corporate
boundaries of the City of Temecula.
C. On April 9, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council")
duly adopted Ordinance No. 91-14 activating the Agency and designating the City Council of the City
of Temecula to be the members of the Agency and Ordinance No. 91-15 adopting a redevelopment
plan, which ordinance had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan
from the County and the County Agency to the City and the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33215(a).
D. On April 9, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-38 which
resolution bound the City to reimburse the County's costs of transferring the Plan to the City
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33215(b).
E. The parties hereby acknowledge that the Agency has paid the County the
costs incurred by the County in transferring the Plan to the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 33215(b) and the City's Resolution No. 91-38.
F. Following consultations between the Agency and representatives of the
County on behalf of the County General Fund, Structural Fire Protection Fund and Library Fund to
determine the fiscal impact of the Plan upon them, the County, the County Agency, County of
Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation (ACORAL), the City and the Agency entered into an
agreement entitled "Agreement Between the County of Riverside, the Redevelopment Agency of the
County of Riverside, County of Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation, the City of Temecula and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for Reimbursement and Distribution of Tax
Increment Funds from the Temecula Redevelopment Project" dated as of May 14, 1991 (the
"Agreement").
R:'uRDA PASS THROUGH~PassThroughAmendmentchg2
G. The Agreement was entered into to address the financial detriment caused by
the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan from the County and the County Agency to the City and the
Agency and was entered into pursuant to the authority of Health and Safety Code Sections 33215(e)
and 33401.
H. The Agency has consulted with representatives of the County and the County
Agency and has determined that there is a continued fiscal impact on the County and the County
Agency from the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan from the County and County Agency to the City
and the Agency.
i. The County, the County Agency, the City and the Agency desire to amend
and restate the Agreement to assist the Agency in financing the Project Area, to address the
continued fiscal impact of the transfer of jurisdiction over the Plan and to amicably resolve any
differences regarding the interpretation of the Agreement.
J. By approval of this Amended and Restated Agreement, the parties hereto find
and determine that any financial effects relating to the Plan are alleviated by the terms of this
Amended and Restated Agreement.
K. The County and County Agency each agree and acknowledge that the
Agency and City are relying upon the representations and warranties of County and CountyAgency
with respect to the matters set forth herein and particularly Section 8.
L. This Amended and Restated Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of
all parties to finance and carry out their statutory purposes and is intended to be a contract within the
meaning of Government Code Section 53511.
M. Pursuant to Section 10 of the Agreement, that certain agreement entitled A
Reimbursement Agreement by and between the County Agency and CORAL, dated April 23, 1991
was terminated as to the Plan and is of no further fome and effect, and, therefore, the County and
County Agency have determined that this Amended and Restated Agreement has no impact on
CORAL.
SECTION 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this Amended and Restated
Agreement, the following terms shall be defined as follows:
A. Assessment Roll. "Assessment Roll" shall mean the 1988-89 assessment
roll, which is the last roll equalized prior to the effective date of Riverside County Ordinance No. 658
adopting the Plan, and which shall be utilized as the base year assessment roll for allocation of
taxes for the Project Area pursuant to Section 33670 of the California Health and Safety Code.
B. Tax Increment Revenue. 'q'ax Increment Revenue" shall mean that portion of
ad valorem property taxes resulting from the increase in assessed valuation in the Project Area over
the base year assessed valuation in the Project Area as defined in Section 33670 of the Health and
Safety Code. Tax Increment Revenue shall mean only those taxes collected as a result of the one
percent levy allowed under Article XIllA of the Constitution of the State of California and shall not
include those taxes levied in excess of the one percent levy.
C. Adjusted Tax Increment Revenue. "Adjusted Tax Increment Revenue" shall
mean Tax Increment Revenue less amounts retained by the County as the annual property tax
administrative charge.
11087~0001~671367.6
-2-
D. County Share. "County's Share" shall mean 18.12 percent of the Adjusted
Tax Increment Revenue.
E. County Structural Fire Department Share. "County Structural Fire Department
Share" shall mean 4.70 percent of the Adjusted Tax Increment Revenue.
F. County Library Department Share. "County Library Department Share" shall
mean 2.18 percent of the Adjusted Tax Increment Revenue.
G. Pass-through Increment. A Pass-through Increment shall mean the amount of
tax increment revenue for each taxing entity to be allocated at the respective percentages
authorized by this Agreement or by the agreements referenced in Section 8.
SECTION 3. Allocation of Tax Increment Revenue. Beginning in fiscal year 2001
02, the Tax Increment Revenue shall be allocated to the taxing entities and distributed by the
Riverside County Auditor-Controller as follows:
A. The County shall retain the County's annual property tax administrative
charge. Such charge is estimated to be approximately $130,000 per year.
B. After disbursement of the amount in paragraph A, the Auditor-Controller shall
disburse to each affected taxing entity the amount of Pass-through Increment calculated based on
the approved percentages pursuant to this Agreement and the agreements referenced in Section 8.
The applicable percentages restated are included in this Agreement as Exhibit 1.
C. After disbursement of the annual property tax administrative charge and the
Pass-through Increment, the Auditor-Controller shall disburse all remaining Adjusted Tax Increment
Revenue to the Agency.
D. The Agency will be responsible for the deposit of Tax Increment Revenue to
the Agency's Iow and moderate income housing fund.
SECTION 4. Prior Property Tax Administrative Charges. The Parties hereby
acknowledge that notwithstanding Section 13 (c) of the Agreement, the County has previously
charged the Agency $545,000 for property tax administration for past years and has withheld such
amount from the distribution of Tax Increment Revenue to the Agency under the Agreement.
Pursuant to this Section 4, the parties hereby agree that the County will retain such sum of $545,000
as repayment of any amounts deferred under the Agreement. The County hereby acknowledges
that the County is not owed any moneys from the Agency for property tax administration with respect
to the Project Area for years prior to fiscal year 2001-02.
SECTION 5. Paymentof$6,000~000. TheAgencyherebyagreestopaytheCounty
the sum of $6,000,000 within 90 days after the Agency issues tax allocation bonds in an amount
sufficient to net the sum of $6,000,000 after the payment of incidental expenses, but in no event
later than one year after the execution of this Amended and Restated Agreement by the Agency as
repayment of any amounts deferred under the Agreement. The County agrees to expend such
funds, and the interest on such funds, pending that expenditure, in a manner determined by the
Agency's bond counsel so as to allow the interest on the tax allocation bonds to be excluded from
the gross incomes of the owners of the bonds.
11087~0001\671367.6
-3-
SECTION 6. $5~000,000 Contribution Towards Acquisition of Right-of-Way for
the Date/Cherry Interchan.qe.
The Agency hereby agrees to contribute approximately $5,000,000 towards the
acquisition of right-of-way for the Date/Cherry Interchange and to complete the acquisition of such
right-of-way within five years after the execution of this Amended and Restated Agreement. The
parties hereby agree that the Date/Cherry Interchange is a regionally significant public improvement
and that the Agency's contribution as provided for in this Section 6 is for purposes of repayment by
the Agency of any amounts deferred under the Agreement. If the Agency does not complete the
acquisition of the right-of-way for the Date/Cherry Interchange within five years after the execution of
this Amended and Restated Agreement, the Agency and County will jointly select an alternative
regionally significant public improvement with an impact on the City of Temecula and the Agency will
contribute approximately $5,000,000 towards the cost of completing such alternative regionally
significant public improvement pursuant to a time schedule mutually agreeable to the Agency and
County. The parties hereby agree that the Agency's contribution toward an alternative regionally
significant public improvement as provided for in the preceding sentence of this Section 6 is for the
purposes of repayment by the Agency of any amounts deferred under the Agreement.
SECTION 7. Use of Tax Increment Revenue for County Fire and County Library
Services.
A. County agrees that the County Structural Fire Department Share and County
Library Department Share shall be used only for payment of expenses for fire protection and library
services respectively within the City of Temecula. Should County cease to provide these services
within the City, Department County shall remit said County Structural Fire Department Share Fire
and County Library Share to the City.
B. Monies allocated by this Amended and Restated Agreement to the County
representing the County Structural Fire Department Share will be considered as local fire tax
revenue raised within the City of Temecula for the purpose of computing additional fire protection
services contract charges above the base level of services and fire tax revenue received, if the City
desires to contract for enhanced fire protection service levels.
SECTION 8. Debts and Obligations in Connection With the Plan. The County
and the County Agency warrant and represent to Agency that the following are the only bonds, debts
or other obligations, financial or otherwise, written or omi, incurred by County or the County Agency
relating to the Plan during the time the County Agency administered the Plan:
A. "Cooperation Agreement Between The Mt. San Jacinto Community College
District, The County of Riverside and The Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside",
dated August 23, 1988; and
B. "Cooperation Agreement Between the Temecula Public Cemetery District,
The County of Riverside and The Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside", dated
August 1, 1988;
C. "Cooperation Agreement Between Temecula Valley Unified School District,
the County of Riverside and the Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside", dated April 17,
1991;
D. "Cooperation Agreement Between the County Service Area No. 75, the
County of Riverside and the Redevelopment Agency For the County of Riverside", dated August 4,
1988;
11087~0001\671367.6
-4-
E. "Cooperation Agreement Between the Eastern Municipal Water District, the
County of Riverside and the Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside", dated October 3,
1988;
F. "Cooperation Agreement Between the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District, the County of Riverside and the Redevelopment Agency For the
County of Riverside", dated November 1, 1988;
G. The Stipulated Judgment in Dawes, et al. v. The Redevelopment Aqenc¥ of
the County of Riverside (Riverside Superior Court Case Nos. 194468MF, 194968); and
H. "Reimbursement Agreement" between the Redevelopment Agency of County
of Riverside and the County of Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation ("CORAL"), dated April 23,
1991.
SECTION 9. Termination of CORAL A.qreement. The parties acknowledge that
the agreement entitled "Reimbursement Agreement" by and between the County Agency and the
County of Riverside Asset Leasing Corporation ("CORAL") dated April 23, 1991 has heretofore been
terminated as to the Plan and is of no further force and effect.
SECTION t0. Repayment of Deferred Amounts. The parties hereby acknowledge
and agree that the payments provided for in this Amended and Restated Agreement satisfy and
discharge the Agency's obligation to repay any deferred amounts under the Agreement. The County
hereby releases the Agency from any obligation to make any payments under the Agreement,
including the repayment of any deferred amounts.
SECTION 11. Amendment of the Plan. The County and the County Agency agree
not to repeal, dissolve or otherwise modify the Plan.
SECTION 12. Amendments. This Amended and Restated Agreement may not be
amended, modified or altered without the express written consent of the parties.
SECTION 13. Administration. The CountyAuditor-Controller shall annually determine
the following:
A. The total amount of Tax Increment Revenue generated by the Plan; and
B. The total amount of Tax Increment Revenue that will be allocated to the
Agency and the taxing entities based on the distribution established by this Amended and Restated
Agreement.
SECTION 14. Review and Audit. All parties shall make their books and records
regarding the Project Area and calculation of Tax Increment Revenue and distribution available to
the other parties for review within thirty (30) days of receiving written notification requesting to review
said records. The County Auditor-Controller shall carefully, fully and in accordance with generally
accepted government accounting practices document all information and calculations supporting the
distributions required by this Amended and Restated Agreement and shall make such information
and documentation available to the Agency.
SECTION IS. Term of ARreement. The effective date of this Amended and
Restated Agreement shall be the date of approval by the appropriate governing body of the last of
11087~0001\671367.6
-5-
the parties to approve this Amended and Restated Agreement and, unless previously terminated by
mutual written agreement of the parties, all rights and obligations in this Amended and Restated
Agreement shall terminate when the Agency's legal right to claim and receive Tax Increment
Revenue from the Project Area shall cease.
SECTION 16. Agreement Not to Litigate. The County, County Agency, City and
Agency each hereby waive against and between each other any and all causes of action, cases,
claims, accounts, actions or complaints relating to, and agree not to challenge the validity of the
Plan or the actions of City described in Section 1, or the validity, on the grounds of the invalidity of
the Plan or the City actions described in Section 1, of bonds to finance or refinance in whole or in
part the Plan, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the legality and validity of all
proceedings heretofore taken for or in any way connected with the designation of the survey area,
the selection of the Project Area, the formation of the Preliminary Plan, the adoption of the Plan, and
the transfer of the Plan pursuant to the City actions described in Section 1 and also including the
legality and validity of all proceedings undertaken in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for
the Plan pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Further, the parties find and
determine that any financial effects described in former Health and Safety Code Sections 33012 and
33401 relating to the Plan, are alleviated by approval ofthisAmended and Restated Agreement. In
recognition thereof, the County and County Agency, except for the obligations set forth in this
Amended and Restated Agreement, forever release, discharge, and acquit the Agency and the City
from any and all sums of money, claims, contentions, allegations, demands, accounts, actions and
causes of any matter, fact, transaction or occurrence whatsoever, whether known or unknown,
suspected or unsuspected, relating to or arising out of any and all matters referred to the Agreement
or in this Amended and Restated Agreement or the Plan. It is understood and agreed that the
foregoing release extends to all claims of every nature and kind whatsoever, known or unknown,
suspected or unsuspected that the District now has or could have asserted relative to the matters
herein described, and all rights under California Civil Code Section 1542 are hereby expressly
waived. Said Section reads as follows:
"A general release does not extend to claims which the
creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of
executing the release, which if known by him must have materially
affected his settlement with the debtor."
SECTION t7. Severability. If any provision, term, covenant or condition of this
Amended and Restated Agreement is held invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this
Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered
impracticable to enforce.
SECTION 18. Integration. ThisAmended and Restated Agreement constitutes the
entire, complete and final expression of agreement between the parties. This Amended and
Restated Agreement supersedes and replaces the Agreement which is hereby rescinded. For
purposes of any changes to the allocations of Tax Increment Revenues for the Project Area as set
forth under the Agreement, any changes caused by this Amended and Restated Agreement shall be
made effective July 1, 2001, and shall be reflected in the fiscal year 2001-2002 tax allocations.
11087~0001\671367.6
-6-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed on their behalf by their duly authorized representatives.
COUNTY Of RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman of the Board
of Supervisors
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman of the Board
ATTEST TO:
Executive Officer-Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
County Counsel
By:
Deputy
11087~0001\671367.6
-7-
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
ATTEST TO:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney and
Agency Counsel
11087~0001\671367.6
-8-
Exhibit 1 ~
County General 18.12%
County Library 2.18%
County Fire 4.70%
City of Temecula 0%
City of Temecula Inc Dispute 0%
Temecula Unified 29.62%
Mt. San Jacinto Jr. College 29.62%
Riverside Co. Office of Education 29.62%
Riv. Co. Reg Park & Open Space 0%
Flood Control Administration 100%
Flood Control Zone 7 100%
Temecula Public Cemetery 100%
Temecula Zone B 0%
Eastern Muni Water 100%
Eastern Muni Wtr Imp Dist U-8 100%
Western Muni Water 14th Fringe 0%
Rancho California Water 100%
1_/ With the exception of the percentages for County General, County Library and County Fire,
all pementages are stated as a percentage of the applicable taxing entity=s share of the tax
increment revenue generated within the Project Area as a result of the one percent levy allowed
under Article XIIIA of the Constitution of the State of California.
11087X0001\671367.6
-9-
RDA
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTO~._.~
ClTY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
'Executive DirectodRedevelopment Agency Members
John Meyer, Redevelopment Director ~
January 22, 2002
Monthly Departmental Report
Attached for your information is the monthly report as of January 22, 2002 for the Redevelopment
Department.
First Time Homebuyers Program
Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 01-02.
Residential Improvement Pro.qrams
The program budget for FY 01/02 is $250,000 and $102,500 has been funded for 26 units.
Affordable Housin,q
The Agency is currently finalizing an agreement with Affirmed Housing. A final agreement
should be ready for Council consideration within 30 days.
Senior Housin.q
Agency staff is negotiating with a development partner to rehab units for an affordable senior
housing project.
Old Town Community Theater
The Redevelopment Agency Board approved the Community Theater's Master Plan at its meeting of
April 24, 2001, The Architect has begun the next Phase of the design, which includes design
development and construction drawings.
R:~SYERSK~MONTHLLYVepod. Janua~y2202.doc
The Mercantile Buildin.q Retrofit
Staff anticipates bringing a contract for Council consideration within 60 days. Staff estimates
about a 90-120 day construction period.
Facade Improvement]Non-Conforming Sign Program
The following facade improvement/sign projects are in process or have recently been completed:
· Gallery Glass
Sign Program
· Welty Building
Paint Exterior
· Country Porch
Fire Suppression System
Country Cottage/Country Garden
Sign Program
Exterior Paint
· Old Town DaySpa
Sign Program
Exterior Paint
Old Town PromotionslMarketin.q
Dickens Christmas in Old Town concluded on December 23 featuring strolling carolers, live
entertainment, pictures with Santa and a craft fair. The Agency is also sponsoring several other
events over the next few months. The events include the Bluegrass Festival, Western Days,
Dixieland Jazz, Street Painting Festival and Summer Nights.
R:~SYE RSK',MONTH LLY~'eport. Jan uary2202,doc
TEMECULA PUBLIC
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
DECEMBER 11, 2001
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public Financing Authority was called to order at
7:28 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, and
Comerchero.
ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBER: Stone.
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 27, 2001.
MOTION: Board Member Roberts moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Board Member Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval
with the exception of Board Member Stone who was absent.
AUTHORITY BUSINESS
2 Formation of Community Facilities District
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL
TAXES THEREIN
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:minutes.tpfa\121101 1
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF
THE PROPOSED TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 01-2
(HARVESTON)
Director of Finance Robeds presented the staff report (of record), providing an overview of the
two resolutions of intention relative to forming a community facilities district per the request of
Lennar Homes of California, Inc., and Winchester Hills LLC.
Noting staff's recommendation to amend the language denoted in Exhibit A (as per page A-1 in
the agenda material), Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that this document provided a
list of facilities (both on-site and off-site) that are eligible for funding under the CFD bond issue,
advising that these improvements generally include the backbone of infrastructure, as well as
various off-site improvements related to the project's impacts; specified that it was staff's
recommendation to add one additional improvement for eligibility (noting that this particular
improvement had been denoted in the Development Agreement with Lennar), in particular that
on page A-1 of the facilities list, an Item "y.," be added which would be the Cherry/Date Streets
Interchange Design Project which has an estimated cost of $1 million; advised that this added
improvement will provide the flexibility for the bond proceeds to be available for use for this
particular design project, as well as those specified on the list; and noted that there will be a
subsequent public hearing at which time this community facilities district will be finalized,
advising that a list of improvements will be identified at that time for final consideration.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Director of Public Works Hughes reiterated that the design
of the interchange was estimated at a little more than $1 million; with respect to Caltrans'
approval of the project, relayed that a complete conceptual approval of the project study report
from Caltrans' staff has been received, as well as from the Federal Highways Administration,
advising that this report will be completed by year's end and submitted to the Federal Highways
Administration, noting the commitment from this administration to review and return the report in
two weeks, relaying that by the end of February 2002 it was anticipated that this will be a signed
and official document; with respect to the $1 million worth of funding, advised that
reimbursement of these funds from another source would not necessarily be sought, but that
due to the magnitude of the entire project, regional and federal funds would most likely be
needed to complete the project; noted that with respect to the $1 million contribution towards the
design, it would potentially be used as a local match towards other federal and regional monies
contributed toward the project; provided additional information regarding the bonding and the
mitigation monies from Lennar; relayed that if this amendment is approved, while there was no
absolute certainty, there was a high probability that the $1 million in funds would be utilized for
the design of this interchange project.
Noting his opposition to amending the document to include the contribution of funds for the
design of the Interchange Project, Board Member Pratt relayed that ninety pement of the
motorists using the interchange will be diverting through the City of Temecula, advising that this
interchange would provide no benefit to those living in the southern part of the City.
R:minutes.tpfa\121101 2
MOTION: Board Member Roberts moved to approve Resolution Nos. TPFA 01-07, and TPFA
01-08, subject to the following revision:
Add-
That Exhibit A be amended as follows: that on page A-1 of the facilities list (per
agenda material), an Item "y.," be added, which would be the Cherry/Date Streets
Interchange Design Project.
The motion was seconded by Chairman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Board Member Pratt who voted no and Board Member Stone who was absent.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No input.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:36 P.M., the Temecula Public Financing Authority meeting was formally adjourned.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secreta~
[SEAL]
R:minutes.tpfa\121101 3
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FIN2~C~E~~
CITY MANAGER ~ '
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
Temecula Public Financing Authority
Executive Director Shawn Nelson
January 22, 2002
Community Facilities District No. 01-02 (Harveston)
RECOMMENDATION: Continue the public hearing to the meeting of February 12, 2002.
BACKGROUND: Due to ongoing discussions with the properly owner, it is recommended this
public hearing be continued.
ITEM 19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA[~L,(~,,E,,
CITY MANAGER /~',_)
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Susan W. Jones
City Clerk/Director of Support Servicas
January 22, 2002
Rescheduling of March 12, 2002 City Council Meeting
RECOMMENDATION: Direct the City Clerk to re-schedule the regular City Council Meeting of
March 12, 2002 to March 5, 2002 and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements
of the Government Code.
BACKGROUND: It has been recommended by members of the City Council to reschedule the
meeting of March 12, 2002 to March 5, 2002, since four members of the City Council; Mayor
Roberts, Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Councilman Comerchero and Councilman Naggar will be attending
the National League of Cities Congressional City Conference in Washington, D.C.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Agenda Reports/Meeting Schedule 1
ITEM 20
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CtTY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
January 22, 2002
Community Service Funding Program
PREPARED BY: Denise Caravelli, Administrative Secretary
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Review and approve the 2001-02 Community Service Funding Program grants per the attached table
outlining the committee's recommendations of 43 organizations totaling $125,500.
DISCUSSION:At the City Council meeting of February 13, 2001 the City Council appointed
Councilmembers Jeff Stone and Mike Naggar to the 2001-02 Community Service Funding Program
Ad Hoc Committee to allocate grant funds to non-profit organizations that provide community
services to the citizens of Temecula.
Community Service Funding Program applications were mailed to 113 non-profit organizations in the
Temecula Valley area on July 18, 2001. In addition to the mailing, advertisements were placed in the
local papers. A total of 55 organizations submitted applications requesting $241,403 in grant
funding.
The Committee, along with staff members, reviewed the requests for funding based on criteria
previously adopted by the entire council. After review and discussion the committee recommends 42
of the 55 organizations receive grants, totaling $124,500. One organization, Vineyard of the New
Wine, is being recommended for $1,000 funding only by councilman Mike Naggar. Due to a conflict
of interest with this organization, councilman Jeff Stone abstains from any recommendation
regarding this organization.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been made available in the Community Service Funding
line-item to fund these requests. The above grant recommendations totaling $125,500 plus previous
funding to the American Red Cross and Susan G. Komen's Race for the Cure of $25,000 each
brings the total Community Service Funding grants allocated in this fiscal year to $175,500.
Attachment: Community Service Funding Program Committee Recommendation Schedule
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORTS
APPROVAl_
DIRECTOR OF FINANCI~
CITY MANAGER ~.~/' ~'~'~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. Elmo, Director of Building and Safet~
January 28, 2002
Departmental Report
Calendar Year 2001
PREPARED BY: Carol Brockmeier, Administrative Secretary
END OF CALENDAR YEAR
TOTAL NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED ................................................................. 3097
NSFR ................................................................................................................ 941
NCOM ................................................................................................................. 38
TOTAL VALUATION ................................................................................... $174,052,426
TOTAL NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS PERFORMED ........................................................................... 40,208
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manage~.~
January 22, 2002
Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report
Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the
months of November and December 2001.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Leads & Inquiries
During the month of November, the City received 2 leads and during the month of
December the City received 5 inquiries and 1 lead. The leads included a 1,000 sq. ff. - 1,200
sq. ft. sales & service computer games/parts store & arcade, a Mercado Italiano Deli & Fresh
Produce in Old Town (former Musician Workshop) and a planned fiber-optic project.
As part of the EDC's Retention Committee, staff conducted a phone interview with Larry Stern,
owner of Offerman Industries, a motor vehicle parts manufacturing company in Temecula.
The company has been in operation for eighteen years and had relocated from Los Angeles.
During the month of November, the Southwest Riverside County Alliance responded to 2
leads from the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) on behalf of the City of
Temecula. The Alliance received 232 inquiries came from the COMDEX Trade Show, and 3
inquiries from the Expansion Management ad.
During the month of December, the Southwest Riverside County Alliance responded to 7
leads from the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) on behalf of the City of
Temecula. The Alliance received 179 inquiries from the NACORE trade show.
Attached is a copy of the Alliance activity reports.
Media/Outreach Materials
Staff provided articles wdtten by the new City Council members as well as photography for the
January Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter. Staff wrote an article for the
Chamber's February newsletter titled, "City of Temecula Prepares For Future By
Updating Its General Plan." The article explains what is the General Plan, why the City will be
updating its General Plan, provide highlights on some of the major issues Temecula will face in
the future, and encourages the public to attend the Community Workshops.
R:\Wolnickg~,DEPT REPORTS~Dec '01 Dept. Rpt..doc I
Staff wrote an article for the EDC of SW Riverside County's fall newsletter. The topic ~New
Businesses Find Home - Others Eager To Expand in Temecula" highlighted recent business
and development activity.
Staff wrote an article on Temecula for Orange Coast Communications. It will be published in
the 2002 Temecula/Murrieta Community Director.
Staff provided information to Neighbor's magazine for their December and January issues.
This local magazine is distributed to residents on a monthly basis. The City section highlights
new projects, city events, city website information, traffic update and Mayor's column. The
January issue will highlight upcoming projects planned and underway for Temecula.
On December 11th, staff met with Rhodes Design to finalize all the changes on the business
brochure. Due to the holiday, the brochure will be printed and ready for distribution by the
second week of January.
Staff worked with RTA on marketing the City Holiday Shuttle. Staff placed numerous press
releases in local publications, City website, announcement at City Council meeting breaks and
worked with individuals in charge of promotions at the Temecula Town Center, The Promenade
Mall, Tower Plaza and Old Town on cross-promotion.
Staff produced a flyer on "Useful Business Information" which will be sent out with the
Business License Renewal form and letter. The flyer provides information on temporary use
permits, changes to buildings, temporary signs, outdoor storage of materials/equipment, home
occupations, business support programs, permits and first-time homebuyers program.
In December, staff met with the city's webmaster to discuss the economic development
section on the City's website. Staff will draft an outline of the contents to be covered in the
section and get feedback from local commercial brokers and the EDC of Southwest Rivemide
County.
Meetings
Staff attended the EDC Business Relations Committee Meeting on November 1`t. Follow-up
reports were given on ^merican Industrial Manufacturing Services, Osorno Corporation and
Temeka Advertising. Company Contact Reports were given on Bostik, Y3K Grsfix, and Brawley
Guitars.
On December 6th staff attended the EDC Business Relations Committee Meeting. Follow-up
reports were given on Amedcan Industrial Manufacturing Services, Inc. and the Osorno
Corporation. Company contact reports were given on Renaissance Counters & Surfaces, Top
Line Products, McCall's Candles, Multi Visual Products, Offerman Industries, Star
Manufacturing, and Bostik.
Staff met with Cutting Edge Marketing on November 1st for final review of the Alliance CD
Rom.
Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Board of Director's Meeting on
November 15th. The Board reviewed the final report for the Energy Audit Project. Jim O'Grady
provided an RCIP update. O'Grady also reported on the Temecula General Plan Advisory
Committee. Gary Youmans suggested that Board Mernbem provide recommendations to the
General Plan Committee. O'Grady also provided updates on the Harveston petition, opening of
the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station, rezoning of Crystal Ridge and Security/Terrorism segment
aired on Nov. 20th TV28 - police/fire
R:\Wolnickg~DEPT REPORTS~Dec '0l Dept. Rpt..doc 2
Staff met with representatives of local businesses on November and December to further
discuss their expansion projects in Temecula.
Staff met with SANDAG, WRCOG, and other agencies on November 19th to discuss the
jobs/housing grant, which was recently awarded from the State Department of Housing &
Development. WRCOG will have an RFP sent out in early/mid January to survey consultants
on the workforce survey. WRCOG has met with San Diego EDC to discuss the survey and in
January will met with EDC representatives of the vadous cities and areas involved to discuss
the overall project further.
Staff attended a lunch meeting on November 26~ with Alliance consultant Ron Nater and
Stevie Field to discuss the activities of the Aliianse and Ron's current and future direction in
pursuing high-tech businesses for the Southwest Riverside County's region. Staff also attended
a breakfast meeting with Ron Nater on December 24th to further discuss Alliance activities.
Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County
Program Committee Meeting on November 27th. The Program Committee selected the
following presentation topics and meeting dates:
· Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) & CaITrans Update - January 31
· Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) - March 28
· Healthcare Industry - May 24
· Education K-12 - July 25
· Telecommunications & InfrastructureFSmart' Houses and Buildings - September 26
· Venture Capital - November 21
Other important discussion topics were considered. These topics will be carded forward to 2003
or use them as alternates should pdmary topics be postponed. They are as follows: · UCR Research and High-Tech Industrial Park
· Site Selection - expert opinion on the advantages/disadvantages of the region's
business climate
· Tourism and Entertainment Economy/Hospitality Industry/TOT
· MVVD - Diamond Valley Lake
· Murdeta Creek and Regional Flood Control Issues
· Water Districts Update/What is Lake Elsinore's water situation, and their current and
future reclamation projects?
Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturara' Council luncheon on
November 30th. Program featured Freddie Clemons, VP of 112, inc., a firm specializing in High
Tech Data Security, voice over Intemet (VOIP), etc. Their customer base includes: Cisco
Systems - Boeing - Starbucks - K2 Sports and Laidlaw Transportation. Temecula police
officers provided insight on how individuals can heighten their awareness and implement
secudty and safety measures into their businesses and pdvate lives. Mr. Dave Sharp of
Temecula based Magnecomp Corporetion with facilities in Singapore will detail what is
occurring relative to the importing and exporting of manufactured products since September
11th.
Staff attended the UCR CONNECT meeting on December 7th. A review was provided on UCR
CONNECT accomplishments for 2001 and shared plans for 2002 goals. Staff also attended the
UCR Connect LINKS Program on December 7~. Mike Khaled of Ocean Consulting Group
spoke on strategic development planning - "The Architects of Business".
Staff attended the Murrieta Temecula Group meeting on December 7t~ at Callaway Winery.
Development in the French Valley region was discussed.
RAWolnickg~DEPT REPORTS~Dec '0l Dept. Rpt..doc 3
Staff attended the 8th Annual UCR Economic Forecast Breakfast meeting on December 7~.
Keynote speaker Michael Bazdadch, Director of UCR Forecasting Center, spoke on "The 2002
economic forecast, national and state economic trends, future of interest rates and the Inland
Empire economic forecast. Other speakers included Michael Keran, former Director of
Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, spoke on "The Federal Reserve and
Financial Markets after September 11th" and Tom Stevens of Wilshire Asset Management spoke
on "Forecasting Stock Returns in an Uncertain Market."
Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance meeting on December
12t~. The Alliance gave an update on the GIS/website. GIS Planning will develop their GIS site
and it should be completed in 3 months. The CD-Rom and Economic Profile will be completed
by the end of December. Discussion items included Techbeach (company develops websites
for job postings, real estate, etc.), Alliance involvement with UCR CONNECT and advertising
opportunities, which include California CEO and Outlook magazines. The next Broker Breakfast
will be held January 29~ in Lake Elsinore.
City Departments held a meeting to discuss marketing the Old Town area to potential
businesses. Staff has developed a draft outline of a marketing plan to attract selected
businesses to the area, which will be discussed and considered for the City's 2002-03 budget.
Staff met with representatives from Time-Wamer on December 6= to discuss a planned fiber-
optic project to provide telephone and Internet service project in Temecula.
On December 10~, staff met with Joseph Ahn, Deputy Director of California Trade &
Commerce Agency. Mr. Ahn discussed what the Agency could do for the City of Temecula. In
regards to leads, Mr. Ahn stated that the leads would not have to go through the Inland Empire
Economic Partnership and that they could be sent directly to the City or to the Economic
Alliance for follow-up.
In December, staff met with Brad Ducich of TRES D LLC to discuss issues regarding a
potential college campus to be located in the Weefaide Business Park.
Staff met with Richard Haness and Matthew Fagan on December 13*~ to discuss the Villages of
Old Town project. This mixed-use housing project is designed to revitalize Old Town
Temecula and will consist of approximately 1,360 apartments, 165 townhouses and 110 single-
family attached townhomes.
TOURISM
Medial Outreach Materials
Staff prepared press release for the 2002 Rod Run and sent it to Mary Forgey, RV Journal.
Photo was sent also. The event was published in their Winter issue (see attached). This lead
was a result of the City's calendar of events that is sent out on a quarterly basis.
Staff provided Michael Kaitz, PMI Inc. of Las Vegas, with information on Temecula. The
company develops textbooks on tourism travel. They also film video clips highlighting areas in
which toudsts may be interested. He is going to focus on the Mission Inn and day trips from
Riverside, i.e. Temecula, Palm Springs, mountain areas.
Staff provided Yvonne Guerra, a freelance writer, with tourism information. (She also works for
City of Glendale.) The article on French Valley Airport and the Temecula Valley will be
published in Pilots Getaways magazine.
R:\Wolnickg~DEPT REPORTS~Dec '01 Dept. Rpt..doc 4
Staff will be working with Darci Castillegos, operates the French Valley Airport Cafe, on
creating partnerships between French Valley Airport and Temecula's tourism entities.
Staff prepared a long-lead calendar of events (main event listing) which was sent out to
member Convention & Visitor Bureaus to include in their newsletters and on their websites (i.e.
Ontario CONVIS, Anaheim CONVIS, San Diego CONVIS and the Inland Empire Tourism
Council.
Golf resorts with meeting facilities will be featured in the cover story of the February 2002 issue
of Association News. In November, staff provided Ann Shepphird with information and
photography on the Temecula area and Temecula Creek Inn. Staff contacted Temecula Creek
Inn to provide more specific information regarding state or regional association meeting
planners that have held their meetings at their resort and also updated information on TCl's
expansion. This publication is sent to meeting planners.
In December, staff provided Judy Steele with information on Temecula events to include in their
March issue of Southwest RV Traveler.
Temecula was featured in the Where to Retire Magazine, November issue. Staff sent
information and photos to Jynelle Garcia (see attached copy). Temecula was listed as one of
the best cities to retire.
Temecula was featured in Where Orange County Concierge News December issue (see
attached). The newsletter is distributed to concierges in upscale Orange County hotels.
Temecula's co-op ad in Where magazine December issue is also attached.
Staff wrote articles for the December Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter titled, "City
of Temecula Holiday Festivities" and "City of Temecula Holiday Shuttle".
The jacket cover for the City's Tourism CD Rom was designed and approved by staff and the
marketing committee. Staff will continue to work with Group One Productions on the
development of the CD Rom.
Trade Show
The City and Chamber received 2 qualified leads from the Group Tour Live Tradeshow held
in Ontario in October. A senior group from Big Bear Lake will be attending the Balloon & Wine
Festival. Karen Richmond of Promenade Travel from Sun City AZ, will be bringing in a senior
group of 50 to Temecula in ^pril. Staff sent information on the activities in Temecula and a
suggested itinerary.
Temecula will partner with San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau at the Los Angeles Times
Travel Show, which will be held in Long Beach on February 16 & 17. Staff will participate at the
show with members of the Chamber Tourism Committee.
Temecula will partner with the Inland Empire Tourism Council (IETC) at the Orange County
Register Show, which will be held at the Orange County Fair Grounds on February 2 & 3. As
an IETC Board Member, City staff will be manning the booth with IETC staff.
Meetings
Staff attended the Chamber of Commerce Tourism Committee meeting on November 1st.
Staff and the Chamber reported on the Group Tour Live Trade Show that Temecula participated
in. Staff gave an update on the Fall Fam Tour, which was postponed due to the timing of the
R:\Wolnickg~DEPT REPORTS~D~c '01 Dept. Rpt..doc 5
September 11 event. In addition, staff provided an update on the City's marketing and
advertising activities. The City recently joined the Ontado Convention & Visitors Bureau. The
Chamber opposed the State Referendum for Tourism Marketing upon recommendation of the
Chamber's Tourism Committee. The Tourism Marketing Act did get approved to move forward.
Staff met with Pat Vesey on November 20th to discuss the 2002 Fall Rod Run. The event will
be held October 11 & 12 in Old Town.
Staff attended the Inland Empire Tourism Council Board of Directors meeting on November
20th. Items discussed included co-sponsorships of upcoming trade shows, Visitor Guide status,
membership status and discussion of the tourism by-laws.
Misc.
The City of Ontario will have a float in the Pasadena Tournament of Roses Parade. They have
included Temecula Valley Winegrowers brochures and information on Temecula in their press
kits that will be given to the Tournament House and Fiesta Floats.
ATTACHMENTS
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report
Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County
Activities Report
Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Activities Report
Inland Empire Economic Partnership Activities Report
Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report (not submitted)
Media/Advertising Coverage
R:\Wolnickg~DEPT REPORTS~Dec '01 Dept. Rpt..doc 6
27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124
Temecula, CA 92591
Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201
December 10, 2001
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Shawn,
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of
Temecula.
This is the month of November at a glance:
Business Inquiry Highlights:
In the month of November, 7 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business
in Temecula. They received a business packet, which includes a copy of the City of Temecula
demographic, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc.
Chamber Board Update:
The following Board of Directors have been nominated for a 3 year term by the membership.
Dr. Larry Francis, Ron Bradley, Pamela Voit, Chuck Washington and Joan Tussing.
Committee HighLights:
Tourism & Visitors Council: Tourism Council members have had a very successful 2001.
Participating in Trade Shows, Fam Tours, updating the "Big Business Presentation", providing
event business-visitor survey's, advertising, outreach materials, Tourism Booth at the Temecula
Valley Balloon and Wine Festival and a Tourism booth at TVCC's Business Showcase.
Members became acquainted with several tourism related businesses while conducting general
meetings at these locations. The committee is looking forward to continuing its relationship with
the City to market Temecula as a tourist destination.
n
Education Committee: The committee is currently collecting girl certificates for services or
discounts from Chamber businesses as part of an ongoing teacher recognition program. The girl
certificates will be attached to certificates of recognition to be given to all teachers in Temecula.
To assist the TVUSD's elementary schools with their reading programs, the Chamber has asked
for volunteers to contact the literary specialists at the school.
Ways & Means Committee: The 36th Annual Installation Div, ner scheduled for February 23,
2002 at Pechanga Entertainment Center. Plans are under way for the 1 lth Annual Chamrock
Golf Classic, which will take place May 3a, 2002 at Temecula Creek Inn. The "Talk of the
Town" committee has met and will focus their next meeting on reserving a guest speaker for this
year's event.
Local Business Promotions Committee: The Local Business Promotions Committee is
finishing the November Shop Teme~ula First Campaign. The grand prizewinner for the
campaign was Play It Again Sports and their customer LuAnn Thompson. The Committee
decorated the Shop Temecula First float for the 9t~ Annual Electric Light Parade. The
Businesses of the Month for December selected by the Government Action Committee are
California Southwestern Insurance and Verizon. Other campaign winners are Ouch Medical
Center was awarded the Chamber Spotlight, and Rustam Rug Gallery was the Mystery Shopper
winner for the month of December.
Government Action Committee: November 6, 2001 election, the Voter Education Campaign
was a success and the committee plans on continuing the process in the fi~ture. The campaign
encourages everyone to get out and Vote!
Membership Committee Over 90 members and a few non-members attended the November
Ambassador Networking Breakfast. KB Homes and Sun City Gardens were the two business
spotlighted for the same month. Due to the holiday there will no Breakfast schedule for the
month of December. The Appreciation Night is scheduled for Dec. 12, 2001 at Wilson Creek
Winery from 5:30 - 8:30p.m. The Membership and Marketing Committee also would like to
wish everyone Happy Holidays!
· Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution)
Activity Report:
· 200 Temecula Brochures, 200 Winery Brochures, 150 Visitor Guides and 50 One Page Street
Maps to Silver Spoon Caf6 for distribution to guests.
· 200 Temecula Brochures for distribution at the Desert Hills Premium Outlets.
· 175 Winery Brochures to TVCC's Weekend Visitors Center.
· i 50 Visitor Guides to Accent Plastics for distribution to employees visiting Temecula.
· 100 Ternecuta Brochures, 100 Winery Brochures 100 Pechanga Enter~tainment Center Brochures
and 50 Visitor Guides to Temeku Hills for distribution to clients.
· 100 Temecula Brochures, 100 Winery Brochures and 20 Visitor Guides to Coldwell Banker for
distribution to clients.
· 100 Winery Brochures, 50 Temecula Brochures and 25 Visitor Guides to Tucalota Spring for
distribution to clients.
· ! 00 Winery Brochures, 50 Visitor Guides and 35 One-page Street Maps to Outdoor Resorts for
distribution to guests.
· 50 Temecula Brochures, 50 Winery Brochures, 20 School Brochures and 10 Relocation Packets
to Pacific Century Homes for distribution to clients.
· 50 Temecula Brochures to CamSoft Corporation for distribution at a regional meeting in
February.
· 42 Temecula Brochures, 42 Visitor Guides, 42 Winery Brochures and 42 Pechanga Brochures to
The World Mark Club for distribution at a tour in Temecula.
· 30 Winery Brochures to Lisa Citelli for distribution to wedding guests.
Activity Report:
· Total Tourism calls were 1,650 in November.
· Total Phone calls were 3,073 in November.
· Total Walk-ins were 2,852 in November.
· Total Mailings were 202 in November.
· E-mail requests were up 16.94 percent in November.
Also attached are the meeting minutes Ibr the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways &
Means, Membership and Marketing, Local Business Promotions, Government Action Committee's
and a December issue of Temecu!a Today! If you have any questions regarding this information,
please call me at (909) 676-5090. Thm~k you.
Sincerely~.~
cc: Mayor Jeff Comerchero
Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roberts
Councilman Jeff Stone
Councilman Sam Pratt
Councilman Mike Naggar
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
Gau Thomhill, Deputy City Manager
Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
TVCC Board of Directors
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
FOR NOVEMBER, 2001
PHONE CALLS
TOURISM
TOURISM REFERRALS
Calendar of Events
Special Events
General Information
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS
Chamber Vis. Center
This Month This Month
34O
140
204
966
1,650
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PHONE CALLS
* CHAMBER REFERRALS
126
41
1,044
212
3,073
N/A
WALK-INS TOURISM
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
SPECIAL EVENTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL WALK-INS
270
177
67
9O4
161
55
734
217
2,585
130
2
0
133
2
0
0
0
267
MAILINGS
TOURISM
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
TOTAL MAILINGS
87
58
57
202
E-MAIL
TOURISM
RELOCATION
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL E-MAIL
WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS
50
21
74
145
N/A
GRAND TOTALS
PHONE CALLS
WALK-INS
MAILINGS
E-MAIL
THIS MONTH
3,073
2,852
202
145
Total
Year-To-Date
3,822
2,127
2,873
12,470
21,292
2,136
799
13,043
2,289
39,559
N/A
4,583
1,935
1,092
13,173
2,528
983
9,590
2,297
36,181
1,220
1,063
874
3,157
507
367
1,349
2,223
N/A
YEAR-TO-DATE
39,559
36,181
3,157
2,223
CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A
ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS
Chamber Chamber
November, 2000 November, 2001
Percentage
Increase
PHONE CALLS
TOURISM
Tourism Referrals 368 340 -8
Calendar of Events 155 140 -10
Special Events 101 204 102
General Information 1,154 966 -16
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,778 1,650 -7
RELOCATION 154 126 -18
DEMOGRAPHICS 108 41 -62
CHAMBER 1,154 1,044 -10
MISCELLANEOUS 158 212 34
TOTAL PHONE CALLS 3,352 3,073 -8
CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A
WALK-INS
TOURISM 237 270 14
CALENDAR OF EVENTS 139 177 27
SPECIAL EVENTS 52 67 29
GENERAL INFORMATION 934 904 -3
RELOCATION 173 161
DEMOGRAPHICS 96 55 -43
CHAMBER 766 734 -4
MISCELLANEOUS 143 217 52
VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 364 267 -27
TOTAL WALK-INS 2,904 2,852 -2
MAILINGS
TOURISM 70 87 24.29
RELOCATION 79 58 -26.58
DEMOGRAPHICS 61 57 -6.56
TOTAL MAILINGS 210 202 -3.81
E-MAIL
TOURISM 24 50 108.33
RELOCATION 31 21 -32.26
MISCELLANEOUS 69 74 7.25
TOTAL E-MAIL 124 145 16.94
* Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls
27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124
Temecula, CA 92591
Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201
Jaouary 11, 2002
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Shawn,
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of
Temecula.
This is the month of December at a glance:
Relocation Inquiry Highlights: Guidant Corporation contacted the Chamber requesting a Chamber
representative to make a relocation presentation to existing employees. Chief Operations Director
Pattie Deroeux will be going to Menlo Park - Guidant division. We will be shipping relocation, city
maps, housing, rental, community recreation center brochures, school information, etc.
Business Inquiry Highlights:
In the month of December, 5 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business
in Temecula. They received a business packet, which includes a copy of the City of Temecula
demographic, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc.
Chamber Board Update: The 2002 executive board members are as follows: Chairman of the
Board Ron Bradley - Bradley & Associates, Past Chairman of the Board Tomi Arbogast - Stadium
Pizza, 1st Vice Chairman Chuck Washington - Temecula Theatre Foundation, 2nd Vice Chairman
Janet Beck - Beazer Homes, Treasurer Katherine Eggers - Community National Bank and
Secretary Joan Tussing- FASTSIGNS. The appointed directors are as follows: Harry Clark-
Turnkey Schools, Inc., Peggy Evans - Callaway Coastal, Joe Hudon - The Press Enterprise, Greg
Morrison - Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
Chamber staff is currently working on the new chamber website. The completion date is scheduled
for the end of February 2002.
Committee Highlights:
Tourism & Visitors Council: The committee reviewed their Goals & Objectives 2002. The
focus is on enhancing their exiting programs. Congratulations to Event Tech & Rosenow 3 Cent
Copies on being selected as January's Tourism businesses of the month. The City and committee
members will be promoting Temecula at the L.A. Times Travel Show on February 16 & 17, 2002
at the Long Beach Convention Center. Temecula will partner with San Diego Convis. in
the San Diego Island booth. Plans to add tourism related photographs to the statistical
"Big Business Presentation" are currently in progress. Committee members will promote
the presentation to clubs and organizations in the area.
· Education Committee: A Teacher Recognition Program has been initiated by the
committee in appreciation of the teachers who make a difference in the lives of our students, and
in turn, the community. Award certificates along with gift certificates have been collected from
the Chamber members to be given to each teacher. The following businesses have
contributed to this program: A.M.K. Interiors, Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County,
Cal Oaks Brunswick Bowl, Callaxvay Coastal, CC & Co., Community National Bank,
Financial Accounting Services, Gateway Country Store, Great Clips for Hair, Great
Graphics & Framing, Hawaiian Popcorn, JCPenney, Jewel Scene, John Garcia Bail Bonds,
Lake Elsinore Storm Baseball, Outback Steakhouse, Papa John's Pizza, Rancho del Cielo
Golf Course, Redhawk Vision Center, Sizzler Restaurant, Temecula Valley Bank,
Timeless Photography, and Western Eagle Foundation. The first meeting of the year
for the Temecula Youth Job Fair is January 10, 2002. The job fair will be held in
conjunction with The Workforce Development Hire A Youth Program and The Promenade
in Temecula.
Ways & Means Committee: On February 23, 2002 the 36th Annual Installation Banquet will be
held at Pechanga Entertainment Center. The Title Sponsor for this year's event will be Pechanga
Entertainment Center and American Media/TransWestern Publishing. The ! lth Annual Chamrock
Golf Classic will be held at Temecula Creek Inn Friday, May 3rd, 2002. This year's Tournament
will include 27 holes. The State of the City committee will be meeting Thursday, January l0th
2002 at the Chamber to plan this year's event. On June 14th, 2002 the 2nd Annual Talk of the
Town will be held at the Temecula Creek Inn. The committee is currently working on scheduling
a Futurist to speak on the upcoming trends that will affect the business market.
Local Business Promotions Committee: The Local Business Promotions Conunittee is
currently reviewing their goals for the year 2002. With emphasize on improving the existing
campaigns. The Businesses of the Month for January selected by the Tourism Committee am
Event Tech and Rosenow 3 Cent Copies. Other campaign winners are Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District was awarded the Chamber Spotlight, and Temecula Valley Precise Escrow is the
Mystery Shopper winner for the month o f January.
Government Action Committee: The Government Action committee meetings will be held at
the Murrieta Chamber this year. Committee goals will be completed this month.
Membership Committee The December 12"' Membership Appreciation Night at Wilson Creek
Winery was a huge success with over 300 members and few non-members in attendance. The
first mixer of the year 2002 will be on January 16th at Temeku Hills Golf Club, hosted by Chris
Warner ('Fax Concept/Entr6e Care) followed by the Ambassador Networking Breakfast on the
23~d of January at the Embassy Suite Hotel in Temecula.
Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution)
Activity Report:
500 Temecula Brochures, 500 Winery Brochures to University of New Orleans for distribution at
a convention.
· 40 Temecula Brochures and 40 Winery Brochures to Los Willows lnn& Spa for distribution to
tourists.
· 30 Visitor Guides and 30 Winery Brochures to Guidant Corporation for distribution to associates.
· 20 Temecula Brochures, 20 Winery Brochures, 20 Pechanga Brochures and I0 Visitor Guides to
Outdoor Resorts Rancho California for distribution to tourist.
· 20 Visitor Guides, 20 Winery Brochures and 20 Tour of Temecula Maps to Herb Babitzke for
distribution to Leisure World residents visiting Temecula.
Marketing Highlights:
Chamber staff formulated the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Climate document 200 l.
The climate document list average temperature highs and lows and precipitation from January
through December 2001. The document is provided upon request by phone, Chamber walk-ins or
is mailed out.
Chamber staffhas formulated the Calendar of Events 2002. The event calendar is placed on the
Chambers web-site and is distributed to Chamber walk-ins, by phone and is mailed out.
Additional calendar information is added upon request. The calendar information is provided to
the City of Temecula to formulate the cities long lead calendar that is mailed to consumer,
tourism trade media and designated media planners.
Activity Report:
· Total Tourism calls were up 5 percent in December.
· Total Phone calls were 2,882 in December.
Total Walk-ins were up I percent in December.
· Total Mailings were 178 in December.
· E-mail requests were up 5.51 percent in December.
Also attached are the meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways &
Means, Membership and Marketing, Local Business Promotions, Government Action Committee's
and a January issue of Temecula Today! If you have any questions regarding this information, please
call me at (909) 676-5090. Thank you.
· President/CEO
May~r Jeff Comcrchcro
Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roi:errs
Ciluncilman J¢fi'Stone
Councilman Sam Fratt
Councilman Mike Naggar
Shawn Nelson. City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
Gary 'lllomhill, Deputy City Manager
Gloria Wolnick. Marketing Coordina~r
TVCC Board of Directors
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
FOR DECEMBER, 2001
PHONE CALLS
TOURISM
TOURISM REFERRALS
Calendar of Events
Special Events
General Information
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS
Chamber Vis. Center
This Month This Month
3O6
168
121
957
1,552
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL PHONE CALLS
* CHAMBER REFERRALS
136
57
957
180
2,882
N/A
WALK-INS TOURISM
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
SPECIAL EVENTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
CHAMBER
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL WALK-INS
299
138
67
875
173
59
73O
181
2,522
91
2
0
163
1
0
0
0
257
MAILINGS
TOURISM
RELOCATION
DEMOGRAPHICS
TOTAL MAILINGS
54
58
66
178
E-MAIL
TOURISM
RELOCATION
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL E-MAIL
WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS
10
23
101
134
N/A
GRAND TOTALS
PHONE CALLS
WALK-INS
MAILINGS
E-MAIL
THIS MONTH
2,882
2,779
178
134
Total
Year-To-Date
4,128
2,295
2,994
13,427
22,844
2,272
856
14,000
2,469
42,441
N/A
4,973
2,075
1,159
14,211
2,702
1,042
10,320
2,478
38,960
1,274
1,121
94O
3,335
517
390
1,450
2,357
N/A
YEAR-TO-DATE
42,441
38,960
3,335
2,357
CHAMBER REFERRALS
ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS
Chamber Chamber Percentage
December, 2000 December, 2001 Increase
PHONE CALLS
TOURISM
Tourism Referrals 266 306 15
Calendar of Events 119 168 41
Special Events 150 121 -19
General Information 943 957 1
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,478 1,552 5
RELOCATION 130 136 5
DEMOGRAPHICS 50 57 14
CHAMBER 1,099 957 -13
MISCELLANEOUS 162 180 11
TOTAL PHONE CALLS 2,919 2,882 -1
CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A
WALK-INS
TOURISM 195 299 53
CALENDAR OF EVENTS 115 138 20
SPECIAL EVENTS 40 67 68
GENERAL INFORMATION 839 875 4
RELOCATION 170 173 2
DEMOGRAPHICS 74 59 -20
CHAMBER 815 730 -10
MISCELLANEOUS 182 181 -1
VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 320 257 -20
TOTAL WALK-INS 2,750 2,779 1
MAILINGS
TOURISM 63 54 -14.29
RELOCATION 84 58 -30.95
DEMOGRAPHICS 74 66 -10.81
TOTAL MAILINGS 221 178 -19.46
E-MAIL
TOURISM 29 10 -65.52
RELOCATION 19 23 21.05
MISCELLANEOUS 79 101 27.85
TOTAL E-MAIL 127 134 5.51
* Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls
December 11, 2001
Jim O'Grady
City of Temecula
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
RE: Activity Summary - November 2001
Business Development
Staff received the following three business development leads:
· A phone inquiry from Janette Norman of Dove Creek Designs in Colorado, who was looking for grant
funding to create a website to sell wholesale/retail floral and craft products. The company trains
and employs individuals who choose to move from adverse circumstances into a self-sustaining,
economically empowered lives. High-risk youth, adults in transition, single mothers and Native
American youth working to balance the oppression of reservation life are given a chance to transcend
their difficulties. The proposed website would be designed and administered in Southwest
Riverside County, which would create additional jobs in the local area, although the products
would be assembled in Colorado. Staff made initial contact with Pechanga Development Corporation
for possible grant opportunities. Negotiations continue between Dove Creek Designs and Pechanga.
· A phone inquiry from Bill Thorp, who requested information on angel funding to develop a high-end
billiard hall. Staff provided Mr. Thorp with several contacts that could help him find start-up funds
for his project.
· A phone inquiry from Diane Cruzen of Quest Construction in San Diego, who was seeking
information on the fire station development in Weft Valley. Staff provided Ms. Cruzen with a
contact at the City of Temecula Planning Department.
Community Outreach
Staff attended the following meetings/events to promote or assist economic development:
· Murrieta-Temecula Group Meeting - Susan Norton of Guidant Corporation was the guest speaker.
(11/02)
· SANDAG Iuterregional Jobs/Itousing Project - Discussion topic was to design and implement a
commuter survey for residents in Southwest Riverside County. (I 1/02)
· SWRC Manufacturers' Council Board Meeting- (11/14)
· Meeting with Celia Burda, United Way - Ms. Burda is a regional coordinator who is conducting a
needs assessment survey on community outreach programs, such as medical/insurance programs,
food/shelter programs, crisis/trauma programs, etc. Staff completed the survey and referred other
EDC contacts to help with survey data. (11/19)
· Mt. San Jacinto College Meeting - Rick Collins and Michael Conner of Mt. San Jacinto College
invited Diane Sessions and Stevie Field to help coordinate a breakfast summit for local business
owners. The purpose of the summit is to identify workforce training needs in the local business
community through roundtable discussion with business owners. Mt. San Jaeinto College will receive
grant fimds to instruct the community's workforce needs. (11/27)
Jim O'Grady
City of Temecula
Activity Summary - November 2001
Page 2 of 2
SWRC Manufacturers' Council Luncheon - Featured topics included workplace security provided
by the Temecula Police Department and a presentation by Magnaenmp on the effects of import/export
policies since September 11. (11/30)
Business Relations
Business Relations Committee Meeting - November 1, 2001 (See attached meeting minutes for
discussion topics.)
Administration/O rl~anization
· California Association for Local Economic Development (CALED) Conference, Building a
Powerful Community - Staff attended the two-day conference in Burbank, CA. Conference topics
focused on business retention. (11/07 & 1108)
· EDC Board of Directors Meeting held in the Workforce Development Center in Temeeula. (11/15)
(See attached meeting minutes for discussion topics.)
· Administration - Staff managed the daily operations of the EDC office, administered the EDC website
and various email community updates, and began the EDC Winter 2001 newsletter.
This concludes the activity summary for November 2001. Should you have questions or need further
detail, please call me at 600-6064.
Respectfully,
Diane Sessions
Executive Director
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, November 1, 2001 - 9:00 a.m.
Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room
27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA
Committee Members Present:
Aaron Adams, City of Temecuia
Stevie Field, SWRC Economic Alliance
Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank
Dick Kurtz, CDM Group, Inc.
Michael Lewin, Mirau Edwards Cannon Harter & Lewin
Loft Moss, City of Murfieta
Mark O'Connor, Lee & Associates
Paul Ramsey, Keeton Construction
Tony Renz, Diversified The Staffing Solution
David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council
Diane Sessions, EDC Staff
Also In Attendance:
Ron Nater, SWRC Economic Alliance
Robert Ryan,
AmeriCon Constructors, Inc.
Call To Order
· Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.n~
Welcome
· Michael. Lewin welcomed Paul Ramsey of Keeton Construction and thanked all for attending.
Follow-up Action Reports
· American Industrial Manufacturing Services, Inc. (AIMS) - David Rosenthal spoke to Ted
Hating of Eastern Municipal Water District and Greg Morrison of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District to obtain information on funding/tax credits for manufacturers that recycle water. He will
forward the information to AIMS. Item remains open.
· Osorno Corporation - David Rosenthal to provide possible options to help reduce expenses in
electrical use and to provide information on export development. Jim O'Grady suggested providing
information on small industrial development bonds. Diane Sessions provided information on Edison's
electrical rebate progran~ Item is closed.
· Temeka Advertising - Diane Sessions mailed the business owner energy-saving information used
during the energy audit program. Item remains open.
Company Contact Reports
· Bostik, Inc. - Aaron Adams reported Jim O'Grady and David Rosenthal met with Ed Lui, plant
manager of Bostik, Inc. in Temeeula. The company manufactures hot melt and liquid adhesives for
the automotive and building industry. In operation for over 100 years, the company has been in
Southwest Riverside County for three years. There are multiple sites internationally. This site is
Business Relations Committee Meeting
Minutes - November 1, 2001
Page 2 of 4
distribution only. The company relocated fi:om Long Beach to expand into a larger facility and to
leave the high crime area in Long Beach. There are 45 employees at the Temecula site and 6,000-
8,000 employees worldwide. Advantages of the area were noted as good fi~eeway access, cheap land
prices, near their local market in the Western U.S, and quality of life. Disadvantages of the area were
noted as rapid growth and traffic. Primary customers are in the construction industry throughout the
Western U.S. Primary competitors were listed as manufacturers of custom building products. The
business is self-ranked large in its industry, among the top 10%. Sales were up by 20% companywide
in the past year due to a strong economy in construction. Sales were lower in the automotive and
aircral~ industries. The local economy was ranked as stable. Principal suppliers are located in the LA
Basin, cement suppliers in Riverside, and sand suppliers in San Juan Capistrano. Fifty percent of
employees live in TemeculaIMurrieta, 20% in Perris, 20% in Hemet, and 10% in other areas. The
company plans to increase its workforce by 10 next year. There are plans to expand the plant another
60,000 square feet at the current site by 2003. Ed Lui indicated company owners were happy doing
business in the area. He volunteered to be a contact person for other companies planning to relocate
to Southwest Riverside County. The following information was provided during the visit:
Employment Development Department, ACCESS Training/Wayne Sutter for certified forklffi
operators, hotel information, placement on the newsletter mailing list.
Y3K Grafix - Loft Moss reported she and Rex Oliver had a phone interview with co-owner Mark
Klingsporn of Y3K Grafix in Murrieta. In operation for five years, the company produces large-
format fleet graphics for vehicles, and specially-designed floor, window, wall and mural promotional
graphics. The company employs six individuals, who live in Temecula, Murrieta, and Hemet.
Operations began as a home-based business and expanded into a commercial site. With no known
local competitom, the company's primary customers include the City of Murrieta, Greyhound
transportation event coordinators, and local real estate brokers. Self-ranked small in its industry, the
company had increased sales fi:om last year due to 100% aggressive marketing. The local economy
was ranked stable. Suppliers are located in San Diego and Los Angeles. Owners plans to increase
the workforce, with no plans to expand the plant site. Owners are happy doing business in Murrieta.
Due to the nature of computer graphics delivery, the company had major issues with DLS access.
The City of Murrieta continues to work with Verizon to help resolve the issues. Y3K is currently
using an independent provider of wireless DSL.
Brawley Guitars. - Mark O'Connor reported a visit with Keith Brawley, owner of Brawley Guitars
in Temeeula. The company sells and distributes electric guitars that are manufactured in South Korea
and considered high-end, quality instruments. The company's operation started in Temecula three
months ago. Eight employees work for Brawley, four in-house and four in outside sales. All
employees live locally. Locale advantages were noted as favorable due to freeway access. The
owner lives in Temeculm There were no locale disadvantages listed. Primary customers are guitar
players nationwide. Primary competitor is Fender Guitars in Corona. The company is self-ranked as
small in the industry. The local economy was ranked as declining. Principal suppliers are guitar
manufacturers and box manufacturers. Suppliers are located in South Korea and Los Angeles.
Business Relations Committee Meeting
Minutes - November 1, 2001
Page 3 of 4
The owner plans to increase the workforce by 100% and to expand the plant site to double capacity
within the next several years. Mr. Brawley is happy doing business is Temecula.
Mark O'Conner reported that commercial brokers were seeing a number of small businesses
struggling to make rent due to the current and anticipated slow down in manufacturing and
distfibutior~ He suggested the Committee investigate any "safety net" options in lending to help with
the issues, as there could be excess second-generation industrial space if the economy lags. Action
Item: David Rosenthal will connect Lisa Garcia-Gleissner of Riverside County Industry Clustering
Project with Mark 0 'Connor to provide clustering programs that may address site sharing.
Goal Progress Report
· Michael Lewin announced that visits and phone interviews in the fourth month of the fiscal year were
as follows:
27 visits ~ 3 points each + 33 phone interviews @ 1 points each = 60 visits/calls ~114 points
YTD VISIT PHONE POINTS
Goal 27 33 114
Actual 8 1 25
Variance -19 -32 - 89
New Committee Assignments
* Committee members assigned for November 2001 visits were Keith Johnson - green binder ~4,
Michael Lewin - blue binder #5, and Gary Youmans - blue binder #2. Dick Kurtz and Lori Moss
volunteered to assist with visits to McCall's Candles, and Mark O'Connor and Loft Moss volunteered
to assist with Multi Visual Products.
· Strategic Visits - McCall's Candles, MGM Wire & Cable, and Poma Distributing Co.
EDC News and Other Information
· SWRC Economic Alliance - Stevie Field reported that media advertising was ongoing; she attended
the WestCon Trade show and received some good leads; the regional demographic profile and
marketing CD-ROM were nearly complete.
· SWRC Manufacturers' Council - David Rosenthal reported the Council's board elections would
be completed by thc new year; the next luncheon would be held on November 30 at the Hungry
Hunter; memberships were going well.
· City, County & Chamber Updates - City of Lake EIsinore - No report available. City of Murrieta
- Loft Moss reported thc Jefferson Avcnne Corridor was on schedule with two lanes to open on
November 6; bids for thc Town Square Project would be accepted. City of Temecula - Aaron
Adams reported a meeting with SANDAG was scheduled on Friday, November 2 to discuss a
commuter survey. Riverside County EDA - No report available.
Business Relations Committee Meeting
Minutes - November 1, 2001
Page 4 of 4
Lal~e Elsinore galley Chamber of Commerce - The next luncheon is scheduled on November 8 at
11:30 a.m. at the Diamond Club restaurant at Storm Stadium in Lake Elsinore. Murrieta Chamber
of Commerce - Lori Moss reported the next Business Expo was scheduled on November 3 from
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at Staples in Murrieta. Ternecula ['alley Chamber of Commerce - David
Rosenthal reported the Voter Education Committee would hit the streets for a sign campaign on
November 2, 5, and 6 at the intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road to encourage
voters to vote.
EDC Board Update - Diane Sessions reported that Gary Youmans was appointed to the City of
Temecula's General Plan Advisory Committee; Ms. Sessions would attend a CALED conference on
business retention on November 7 and 8; the EDC would be represented on Friday at the SANDAG
meeting; the Board would stay apprised of issues relative to boating at Diamond Valley Lake;
Supervisor Venable would host an open house for his new office in French Valley on November 8.
Adiournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:10 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Diane Sessions, Executive Director
Recording Secretary
DRAFT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MEETING
Thursday, November 15, 2001 - 9:00 a.m.
Workforce Development Center
27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA
DRAFT
BOARD MEMBERS
Martene Best, City of Lake Elsinore
Dennis Frank, UCR Extension
Ted Haring, Eastern Municipal Water District
Ron Holiday, City of Murrieta
Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank
Jim King, Southern California Edison
Susan Norton, Guidant Corporation
Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula
Rex Oliver, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce
David Rosenthul, SWRC Manufacturers' Council
A1 Sabsevitz, Verizon
Gary Youmans, Community National Bank
EDC STAFF
Diane Sessions
Mercedes Soto
MEMBERS AND GUESTS
Frank Casciari,
California Bank & Trust
Run Nater,
SWRC Economic Alliance
CALL TO ORDER
· Board President Gary Youmans called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m.
MINUTES
· The Board reviewed the minutes of the October 18, 2001 Board of Directors Meeting. Motion was made by
Al Sabsevitz, seconded by Dennis Frank and carded unanimously to approve the minutes of October 18,
2001 Board of Directors Meeting as presented.
FINANCIAL REPORT
· The Board reviewed the October 31,2001 Financial Report that showed total monthly revenues of $1,118,
total expenses of $10,558 and total cash-in-bank of $71,894.59. Diane Sessions reported that $6,325 in total
consulting expenses attributed to the Energy Audit Project would be reimbursed by Riverside County EDA.
Motion was made by Dennis Frank, seconded by Keith Johnson and carried unanimously to approve the
October 31, 2001 Financial Report as presemed.
NEW BUSINESS
· Appoint EDC Director: Gary Youmans reported the vacated director's seat previously held by Robert Ryan
could be filled by the Board, in accordance with the bylaws. He further reported that EDC Member Brace
Keeton had written a letter to the Board to request an appointment to fill the vacant seat. Discussion was
held on the eligibility requirements to sit as a EDC director or committee member. The Board upheld that a
director or committee member must be in good standing with current dues paid. Board members agreed that
Mr. Keeton's past support of the EDC and his desire to remain an active member on the Board would benefit
the organization. Motion was made by Gary Yomnans, seconded by David Rosenthal and carried
ananimonsly to appoint Brace Keeton of Keeton Construction as Director-At-Large to fill the vacated seat
previonsly held by Robert Ryan until the term expires in June 2003.
Economic Development Corporation
of Southwest Riverside County
Board of Directors Meeting - November 15, 2001
Minutes - Page 2 of 4
NEW BUSINESS {continued)
* Appointment of Stevie Field to Director: Gary Youmans reported that Robert Moran of Riverside County
EDA resigned from the Board due to his many duties with the County. Mr. Moran's designee replacement
was Stevie Field of the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance. The Board agreed that Stevie Field
was a favorable choice, and she would benefit the Board and organization~ Motion was made by Gary
Youmans, seconded by Ted Haring and carried unanimously to appoint Stevie Field to EDC director
representing the Riverside County EDA membership.
CONTINUING BUSINESS
· Membership Update - Gary Youmans reported he would contact prior EDC members for renewals. He
hoped to develop new member interest and encouraged board members to do the same.
· Temccula General Plan Advisory Committee Update - Gary Youmans reported the Committee had not
yet met although a meeting would be scheduled soon. Jim O'Grady reported the project was of high
importance and many changes would be made to the current General Plan. Mr. Youmans reported he would
address this topic in the next EDC newsletter. He suggested that board members provide recommendations
to the General Plan Committee.
· Energy Issues - There were no specific city reports relative to energy issues. The Board discussed insurance
rate increases that companies were paying due to the high energy rates. Susan Norton reported that Guldant
Corporation's energy expenses had increased nearly 100% even after implementing as many energy-saving
processes to operations as possible.
· Energy Audit Project - The Board reviewed the final report for the Energy Audit Project submitted by
Diane Sessions.
· RCIP Update: Jim O'Grady reported the County would make an RCIP presentation at the next Temecula
Council meeting. Ron Holliday reported the County had negotiated with the City of Murrieta relative to
habitat land-usc issues. Marlene Best reported there were no changes to the County's habitat land-usc
recommendations that would affect the City of Lake Elsinore.
OPEN DISCUSSION
· Business Relations Committee - Gary Youmans suggested that board members who make frequent
business contacts with their customers could use the opportunity as a visit for the Business Relations
program. He recommended that possible visits be directed to the Business Relations Committee or Diane
Sessions. Keith Johnson reported a visit with McCall's Candles provided the opportunity for the City of
Murrieta to help resolve storage issues for the company. It was suggested that positive results should be
included in newsletter stories or press releases.
· UCR Connect - Dennis Frank reported the next Links meeting was scheduled for December 7 at 11:30 a.ra~
at Murrieta Council Chambers and would feature Mike Khaled on strategic development planning; scveral
Scandinavian companies would consider venture funding to local businesses with UCR Connect's help; the
Murrieta Temecula Group would meet on December 7 at 7:30 a.m. at Callaway Winery and would discuss
the French Valley region.
· City, County and Chamber Updates: CiO; of Lake Elsinore - Marlene Best reported the City Council
elections were not yet final; a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the Franklin St./Canyon Estates connector bridge
was scheduled on Monday at 2:00 p.m.; Pardee and Forecast homes held their grand openings.
Economic Development Corporation
of Southwest Riverside County
Board of Directors Meeting - November 15, 2001
Minutes - Page 3 of 4
OPEN DISCUSSION (continued)
City ofMurrieta - Ron Holliday reported two Jefferson Avenue lanes had opened, and the project could be
completed as much as eight months sooner than estimated; the City would work on affordable housing to
comply with federal regulations; the Nutmeg bridge was near completion; the annexation application passed,
which would add approximately 7,000 Murrieta Hot Springs residents to the City's population base in July
2002; the Veteran's Day breakfast was well attended; the City added a commercial property listings feature
with GIS capabilities to the economic development page; the City would fast-track properties in the Jefferson
Avenue corridor for future commercial development. City of Temecula - Jim O'Grady reported that
Assemblyman Dennis Holiingsworth would discuss security issues on November 20 at 6:30 p.m. in Temecula
Council Chambers; the rl'obon-cutting ceremony for the Vail fire station would be held on November 20 at
9:00 a.n~; the City filed suit against Riverside County for approval of zone changes in French Valley, which
had been subsequently approved for no zone changes until the RCIP was adopted; the Council filed a court
action for declaratory relief to decide if petitions against the Harveston housing development were valid,
which would expedite a ballot decision if found valid; the next Council meeting would discuss land rezoning
of light-industrial use to mixed-oEfice use of property near Rancho California Road; the City's tourism
brochure recently won two prestigious marketing awards; the City was working with the Southern California
Energy Board for funding of compressed natural gas fueling. Guidant - Susan Norton reported that
Guidant would lease a 67,000 square foot building on Zevo Drive for warehouse distribution and for research
and development. The expansion could create eight to ten new jobs in warehousing and possibly some
engineering and technician positions. Ms. Norton thanked the City of Temecula for their help with the
expansion project. SFFRC Economic Alliance - Ron Nater reported that Stevie Field was at a Comdex
Conference; Silicon Valley's economic outlook continued to be unfavorable; the Alliance would work to
bring venture and angel funding to the region. Discussion was held on how to attract venture capital and
angel funding. Mr. Nater suggested that capital investor solicitation be incorporated in the overall economic
development strategy, perhaps with solicitation of straight land purchases. Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber
of Commerce - No report available. Murrieta Chamber of Commerce - Rex Oliver reported the Chamber's
new website would be launched in early December as www.murrietaehamber.org. Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce - David Rosenthal reported the Voter Education Campaign was successfully
accomplished, although there were low voter turnouts at the polls.
· SWRC Manufacturers' Council - David Rosenthal reported the next Council luncheon was on November
30 at Hungry Hunter restaurant in Temecula; the Council was asked to participate as a partner with the
region's high schools to advance workforce programs, student mentoring and job shadowing programs.
· EDC Administrative Update: The Board reviewed the October 2001 EDC Activity Report submitted by
Diane Sessions. Ms. Sessions reported she attended the SANDAG meeting at Temecula City Hall; the
CALED Conference in Burbank, CA was very helpful; the EDC Program Committee would meet very soon
to plan the 2002 lunch programs. Gary Youmans thanked Mercedes Soto for her help in the EDC oEfice
during Diane Sessions' absence.
Economic Development Corporation
of Southwest Riverside County
Board of Directors Meeting -November 15, 2001
Minutes - Page 4 of 4
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:15 a.m., motion was made by Al Sabsevitz, seconded by David Rosemhal and carried unanimously to
cancel the December 20, 2001 Board of Directors Meeting unless impending matters that required beard action
were necessary and to adjourn the board meeting.
Respectively submitted by:
Diane Sessions Phil Oberhansley
Recording Secretary Board Secretary
January 10, 2002
Jim O'Grady
City of Temecula
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
RE: Activity Summary - December 2001
Business Development
Staffreceived the following three business developmem leads:
· An in-person meeting with Janette Norman of Dove Creek Designs in Colorado, who was
looking for grant funding to create a website to sell wholesale/retail floral and craft
products. The initial contact occurred in November with a follow-up meeting in December.
The proposed website would be designed and administered in Southwest Riverside County,
which would create additional local jobs. Staff made initial contacts and proposal deliveries
to Pechanga Development Corporation and Soboba Tribal Council for possible grant
opportunities. Ms. Norman was successful in securing funding through both sources.
· A phone inquiry l~om Sheila Anderson, who requested demographic and site locations in
Lake EIsinore to build a self-serve car wash. Staff mailed a packet to Ms. Anderson with
various site locations, commercial broker contacts, a Business Resource Guide, and
government contact information relative to pollutant discharge regulations.
· A phone inquiry from JeffNada of MDC Commercial Real Estate in Riverside. Mr. Nada was
representing a client who was searching for 10 to 20 acres to build a car auction facility.
Staff faxed Mr. Nada various site locations and comact information for local commercial
brokers.
Community Outreach
Staffattended the following meetings/events to promote or assist economic development:
· California Bank & Trust Holiday Reception (12/4)
· Professional Women's Roundtable Meeting (12/6)
· UCR Economic Forecast Breakfast (12/7)
· UCR Connect Links Meeting (12/7)
· Meeting with Betty Miller of The Press-Enterprise - Ms. Miller requested an interview for
a news article on the jobs-housing balance in Southwest Riverside County. Two articles in a
series were published on December 13 and December 31.
· Tyler Dorsa & EIdridge Holiday Open House (12/13)
· Meeting with Ed Sternagle of UCR Connect - Mr. Sternagle is the director of UCR
Connect. Mutual projects and partnerships were discussed. (12/20)
Jim O'Grady
City of Temecula
Activity Summary - December 2001
Page 2 of 2
Business Relations
· Business Relations Committee Meeting - 12/6/01 (See attached meeting minutes for
discussion topics.)
Administration/Organization
· Administration - Staff managed the daily operations of the EDC office, added new links and
features to the EDC website, emailed various EDC and business updates to the business
community, coordinated the EDC quarterly newsletter, organized the first meeting for the
2002 Career Fair, arranged thc EDC's 2000-2001 federal/state income tax filing, coordinated
the EDC quarterly luncheon for January, submitted a monthly EDC news article to Thc Valley
Business Journal, and mailed membership solicitation letters.
This concludes the activity summary for December 2001. Should you have questions or need
further detail, please call me at 600-6064.
Diane Sessions
Executive Director
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, December 6, 2001 - 9:00 a.m.
Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room
27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA
Committee Members Present:
Aaron Adams, City of Temecula
Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank
Lori Moss, City of Murrieta
Mark O'Connor, Lee & Associates
Rex Oliver, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce
Paul Ramsey, Keeton Construction
Alice Sullivan, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Diane Sessions, EDC Staff
Gary Youmans, Community National Bank
Also In Attendance:
Ron Nater, SWRC Economic Alliance
Frank Casciari, California Bank & Trust
Mercedes Soto, EDC Staff
Call To Order
· EDC President Gary Yotanans called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.n~
Welcome
· Gary Youmans welcomed committee members and thanked all for attending.
Follow-up Action Reports
· American Industrial Manufacturing Services, Inc. (AIMS) - David Roscnthal spoke to Ted Haring of
Eastern Municipal Water District and Greg Morrison of Eisinore Valley Municipal Water District to obtain
information on funding/tax credits for manufacturers that recycle water. He will forward the information to
ALMS. Item remains open.
· Osorno Corporation - David Rosenthal to provide possible options to help reduce expenses in electrical use
and to provide information on export development. Jim O'Grady suggested providing information on small
industrial development bonds. Diane Sessions provided in~ormatlon on Edison's electrical rebate program.
Item is closed.
Company Contact Reports
· Renaissance Counters & Surfaces - Gary Youmans reported a phone interview with Mike Sesslin, co-
owner and manufacturer of customized counter tops and surfaces. In operation for twelve years, the
company relocated fi.om Fallhrook to Temecula three years ago due to greater market exposure. Primary
business markets were listed as government and military work -- Naval contracts. Primary competitors were
located nationally. Renalssance's primary supplier of silicon and adhesive products was Dupont in New
York. The company was ranked small. Sales remained the same as last year's and the local economy was
ranked stable. The company employs twelve, eight of whom work at the Temecula site. Half of the
company's employees live in Temecula and Murrieta, while the other half commutes fi.om San Diego County.
There were no plans in the foreseeable future to increase the employee base and/or expand the plant. There
were no contingency plans for an electrical outage. Lack of DSL/fiber optic alternatives was a major
concern. Mike Sesslin indicated they were happy doing business in Temecula. There was no interest to be a
contact person for other companies that would contemplate relocating to this area.
Business Relations Committee Meeting
Minutes - December 6, 2001
Page 2 of 4
· Top Line Products - Gary Youmans reported a phone interview with Maggie Williams, owner of Top Line
Products in Temecula. The company was a wholesale distributor of nuts and belts for hydraulic products. In
operation in SW Riverside County for twenty-one years, the company reported fourteen employees, ninety
percent of whom live in the Temecula area. Business advantages of this area were noted as living and
working locally. One disadvantage was the owner had inventory in Santa Fe Springs, CA. Primary
customers were truck stops and hydraulic product users in Southern California, Arizona and Washington.
The company had numerous competitors because of their small size. Sales were down in the past year due to
the recession, but the local economy was noted as getting better. Principal suppliers were noted as
manufacturers of Top Line's products. There were no plans to increase the number of employees or to
expand their plant in the foreseeable future. Contingency plans for a power outage were to back up
computer systems and run generators. Owner suggested the EDC could work on affordable housing for
employees. They were happy doing business in SW Riverside County. EDC information was requested.
· McCall's Candles - Keith Johnson reported he, Dick Kurtz and Lori Moss met with owners Dee & Dan
McCall, mother and son, respectively. The company manufactures gilt candles and clocks. In operation for
eleven years, McCalis relocated to Murrieta two years ago. There were twenty employees: 40% of whom
resided in the Temecula/Murrieta area, 20% in Lake Elsinore and 40% in other Riverside County areas. The
company relocated fi.om Missouri - they were from this area originally and decided to return. Business
advantages of this area were listed as land availability and low property costs compared to other California
areas. One disadvantage was the struggle to find and secure quality labor. Primary customem were gilt
shops, i.e., Hallmark, and similar shops nationwide. Primary competitors were Colonial Candle, Yankee
Candle and Village Candle, located in other states. They ranked themselves as medium-sized, within the top
twenty-five percent of their industry. Sales in the past year had increased due to a new line of candle
products that were very popular. They found the local economy stable. Their principal suppliers were wax
and dye companies located in various regions. They didn't believe their suppliers would be interested in
relocating to SW Riverside County. Their plan was to increase the employee base by five, but would not
plan to expand their plant in the foreseeable future. There were no contingency plans for an electrical outage.
Recently there was some confusion with the issue of the stacking height in industrial buildings in Murriet~
They were informed at some point early on that the limit was six feet high. Complying with this was causing
a great deal of congestion on the floor, and they were looking at possibly being forced to lease more space to
accommodate their warehousing needs. Lori Moss researched and found a solution (they were actually
permitted to stack much higher) and they were grateful. They were happy doing business in SW Riverside
County and would be a contact for other companies contemplating relocating to this area.
· Multi Visual Products (MVP) - Lori Moss, Rex Oliver, Mark O'Couner and Keith Johnson reported they
met with Jim Clark, President of MVP in Murrieta. Mr. Clark was very receptive to the inquiry and mostly
positive. MVP was a wholesaler ofhighiy-specialized digital photographic products, including trading cards,
calendars, mouse pads, refrigerator magnets and team photo finishing. Primary customers were
photographers fi.om all over. In operation for eight years in SW Riverside County, the company had forty-
three employees. Most employees lived in the TemeculafMurrieta area, and a few commuted fi.om Corona.
The company originated in Temecula, each co-owner working out of their home. They relocated to Murrieta
due to the rapid growth of their business. Business advantages of this area were quality of life, good and
stable workforee, air quality, and central location. Disadvantages were the increased traffic due to the
growth, with the infrastructure issues lagging behind. They ranked themselves as medium within their
industry. Sales were up in the past year due to marketing. MVP's principal printing suppliers were
Unisource Paper (San Diego), Kodak, Kent Landsberg and Rancho Industrial Supply (local). Mr. Clark
Business Relations Committee Meeting
Minutes - December 6, 2001
Page 3 of 4
didn't believe his suppliers would be interested in SW Riverside County. There were plans to increase the
number of employees by ten or more in 2002 along with further expansion of operations. No contingency
plans for an electrical outage were in place as the business would not be terribly affected. Mr. Clark was
happy doing business in SW Riverside County and would be willing to be a contact person for other
companies contemplating relocation to this area. They did state the need for DSL. Follow up items: Lori
would call Verizon regarding their need for DSL.
· Offerman Industries - Aaron Adams reported a phone interview with the owner, Larry Stem. Mr. Stem
was not willing to answer any questions about their operations or products. The company had been in
operation for eighteen years, all of which were in SW Riverside County. Mr. Stem relocated from Los
Angeles because he enjoyed this area. Business advantages noted were cleaner air and fewer people.
Disadvantages were lack of suppliers and shipping costs. He did not know if his suppliers would be
interested in relocating to SW Riverside County. There was no contingency plan for a power outage. His
main concern was traffic, but was generally happy doing business here. He was not willing to be a contact
person for other companies that would contemplate relocating to this area.
· Star Manufacturing - Mark O'Connor reported that Lisa Garcla-Gleissner met with owner Wayne Gilkey.
The company manufactures equipment utilized by aerospace, medical, automotive and food processing
industries. Star had been in business for eighteen years and originated in Hemet, where they maintained their
primary operations. They expanded to Temecula six months ago due to a better labor force and business
growth. There were seven employees in both locations. Most employees lived in Temecula/Murrieta, some
lived in Corona and several lived in Lake Elsinore. During the expansion, two of his biggest customers cut
back orders indefinitely due to the economy and the events of September 11th' Mark O'Connor and others
would help him with site issues. Business looked good for the furore due to some anticipated contracts.
Business advantages of this area were good customer service and freeway access. The only disadvantage
was that rents were high. Primary customers were Honeywell, ITT, and the U.S. Military, mostly located in
Southern California. Competitors were unknown. Mr. Gilkey ranked his company as small. Sales were
down in the past year, but he felt the economy was getting better. Principal suppliers were tooling stores and
various metal vendors around Los Angeles. He didn't think his suppliers would be interested in relocating to
SW Riverside County. Mr. Gilkey planned to increase the employee base within several weeks, and to
expand his plant in the foreseeable future. There was no contingency plan in place for a power outage. He
believed contract work in the local area was needed. He agreed to be a contact person for other companies
that would contemplate relocating to this area. He requested more information about the EDC. Follow up
items: Diane Sessions to send Mr. Gilkey information on Energy Assistance Programs and EDC Services.
· Bostik - Jim O'CJrady, along with David Rosenthal reported a visit with Ed Lni, plant manager of Bostik in
Temecula. The company manufactures adhesives and serves the western United States. Bostik had been in
business for over one hundred years, with operations in Temeeula for three. There were forty-five
employees, half of whom lived in Temecnla and the remainder in Lake Elsinore, Hemet and Perris. This
operation relocated fi.om Long Beach to expand and to leave a high-crime area. Business advantages of this
area were numerous: fieeway access, low cost land, close to market base, low crime rate and quality of life.
Disadvantages were the rapid growth and traffic. Primary customers included the construction industry and
wholesale building contractors. Primary competitors were custom building products companies. Bostik was
self-ranked large in their industry, within the top ten percent. Sales at the Temecula location were up twenty
percent in the past year due to a favorable construction industry. They found the local economy to
Business Relations Committee Meeting
Minutes- December 6, 2001
Page 4 of 4
be stable. Suppliers were in the Los Angeles basin, Riverside and San Juan Capistrano. Bostik planned to
add ten new employees next year and to expand their plant by 60,000 square feet in 2003. They were happy
doing business in SW Riverside County and agreed to be a contact for other companies that would
contemplate relocating to this area.
Goal Progress Report
* Gary Youmans announced that visits and phone interviews in the fitLh month of the fiscal year were as
follows:
27 visits ~ 3 points each + 33 phone interviews ~ 1 points each = 60 visits/calls ~114 points
YTD VISIT PHONE POINTS
Goal 27 33 114
Actual 11 4 37
Variance -16 -29 - 77
New Committee Assignments
* There were no binder assignments for December.
EDC News and Other Information
EDC Board Update - Gary reported there would be a workshop for the General Plan Advisory Committee
on December 6th. EDC Ad Hoc Committee would provide input.
City, County & Chamber Updates - City of Lahe Elsinore - No report available. City of Temecula -
Aaron reported zone changes on Ridge Park Drive t~om light industrial to office use. City ofMurrieta - Lori
Moss reported the Council would work on affordable housing for seniors and qualified residents; Murrieta's
population was 47,000 and would increase to 60,000 al%r the annexation in July 2002; the new mayor was
Dick Ostling. Riverside County EDA - No report available. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce -
Alice Sullivan reported the Chamber elected a new board; the Member Appreciation event was held and forty
businesses were nominated for awards; she attended a ribbon-cutting ceremony for a company that chose to
relocate to the area because of the quality of life; the Education Committee was working on a teacher
recognition progran~ Murrieta Chamber of Commerce - Rex Oliver reported the Chamber's new website
was hosted by Community Little Book and was officially up and running; the next mixer would be at Cai
Oaks Sports Park, sponsored by the Boys & Girls Club of SW Riverside County. Lake Elsinore Valley
Chamber - No report available.
Adiournment
The meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m.
ALLIANCE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Marlene Best Jim O'Grady
Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager
City of Lake Elsinore City of Temecula
Stevie Field
Economic Development/Marketing Coordinator
December 1, 2001
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE
Lori Moss
Assistant City Manager
City of Murrieta
Dear Partners:
Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the
Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement.
Leads:
The Alliance has assisted two businesses, which have chosen SWRC as their new home!
Rosenow, a one-stop copy store that will be up and running on Dec. 1st has signed a
lease in the city of Temecula. Through the WDC, we are now assisting with their
employee recruitment efforts.
Baywood Interiors, the custom cabinetmaker from San Juan Bautista, has entered into
escrow on a 7,000-sq. ft. (approx.) building in Murrieta. Escrow should close by the end of
the month. I am currently working with Phil, the owner, on a few AQMD issues, along with
the assistance of Steve Cain at the Permit Assistance Center. Phil has already hired two
new employees from SWRC and will be looking for up to 15 more in the coming months. We
will be assisting in that process through the WDC.
A total of 235 leads were generated in the month of November. 232 from the COMDEX trade
show, three from Expansion Management, and we received two IEEP leads.
71 calls and/or follow-ups were made on recent and past leads.
Consultinq
Ron Nater has completed his forth month with the Alliance. Ron is currently working on
contacting existing businesses in SWRC as well as the financial and real estate leaders of
the communities. Ron is also working on writing an article on the basics of venture capital.
Ron and I have been meeting with each Partner individually for lunch to discuss the activities
qf the Alliance, Ron and his current and future direction as well as obtaining an update of
each Partners respective jurisdiction. A more complete update will be provided at the regular
Alliance meeting on December 12th.
Commuter survey
I have attended two meeting on the labor fore/commuter survey in the month of November.
At these meetings, we reviewed the questionnaire used on the last survey and made
changes to more specifically identify information that is useful to the Alliance, such as;
where our commuting residents live and where they are going. I hope to have a draft of the
survey by the meeting on December 12th. If so, I will provide a copy to each Partner. I will
be notified via email when the next SANDAG meeting will be scheduled and I will forward it to
each Partner at that time.
CD-ROM
The latest copy of the CD-ROM was provided to the Partners and all comments were
received. A final copy of the CD-ROM, cover and label will be shown at the Partner
meeting on December 12t~.
Trade Shows
As of this date, the Alliance has committed to the following trade shows, of which I will
attend:
· NACORE December 2-5, Nashville, TN
Future show for consideration:
· APEX - (formerly Nepcon) - Electronic assembly equip., Jan. 22-24, San Diego, CA
· MD&M - Medical equipment, supplies and devices, Feb. 5-7, Anaheim, CA
Web-site/GIS
We ara currently preparing to update our web-site using information from the economic
profile and the CD-ROM I will provide a status report at the next Alliance meeting.
Regarding GIS, I have not yet received the requested GIS information from all of the
Partners. Please provide me with the information from your city as soon as possible so that
we may proceed with this project.
Re,qional Update Breakfast
In last month's update, I listed a few dates for consideration for the Regional Update
Breakfast. I have listed them below for your consideration:
January 1 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.
January 16th 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.
~January 22~d~ 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.
Please respond at your earliest convenience so that we can reserve our date.
On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings:
SWRC Manufacturer's Council
Temecula/Murrieta Group
Business Relations Committee
SWRC EDC
LE EDC
Economic Development meetings concerning the Southwest Riverside County region.
UCR Connect meetings
If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at (909)
600-6066.
Sincerely,
Stevie Field
Marketing/Economic Development Coordinator
Copy: Brad Hudson
Robin Zimpfer
Sarah Mundy
Robert Moran
Teresa Gallavan
ECQNQMtC
ALLIANCE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Marlene Best
Assistant City Manager
City of Lake Elsinore
Jim O'Grady
Assistant City Manager
City of Temecula
Lori Moss
Assistant City Manager
City of Murrieta
Stevie Field
Economic Development/Marketing Coordinator
January 3,2001
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE
Dear Partners:
Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the
Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement.
Leads:
A total of 186 leads were generated in the month of December. 179 from the NACORE
trade show, and we received 7 IEEP leads. We will also be sending out Alliance information
to all 969 NACQRE attendees.
56 calls and/or follow-ups were made on recent and past leads.
Consultinq
Ron Nater has completed his fifth month with the Alliance. Ron and I are currently working
on contacting biotech and biomed businesses as well as venture capitalists in California. It
is our goal to have a minimum of three appointments scheduled for January to discuss
SWRC and the opportunities for business and investment. A more complete update will be
provided at the regular Alliance meeting on January 9t~.
Commuter survey
Each Partner has been notified via email that SANDAG plans to release the RFQ for the
commuter sur~ey in January. I will provide updates on this ,project as they occur.
Trade Show~
As of this date, the Alliance has committed to the following trade shows, of which I will
attend:
~' MD&M - Medical equipment, supplies and devices, Feb. 5-7, Anaheim, CA
Future shows for consideration:
WESTEC 2002, Machine tool and metalworking exposition, March 18 - 21,
Los Angeles Convention Center
Web-site/GIS
I have not yet received the requested GIS information from all of the Partners. Please
provide me with the information from your city as soon as possible so that we may proceed
with this project.
Economic Profile
The economic profile is complete. I will provide each Partner with a supply at the Alliance
meeting on January 9th.
Regional Update Breakfast
The 2002 Regional Update Breakfast has been scheduled for 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.,
January 29th. The Alliance will host the breakfast at the Diamond Stadium in Lake Elsinore.
I am currently negotiating catering services with the Diamond caterers. A more detailed
update will be provided at the regular Alliance meeting.
During this breakfast, a preview of the CD-ROM will be provided as well as an update of
past, present and future Alliance activities. Ron Nater will provide a brief three to five minute
presentation on venture capital and each Partner will be provided with three minutes for an
update of his/her respective jurisdiction.
On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings:
SWRC Manufacturer's Council
Temecula/Murrieta Group
Business Relations Committee
SWRC EDC
LE EDC
Economic Development meetings concerning the Southwest Riverside County region.
UCR Connect meetings
If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at (909)
600~6066.
Sincerely,
Stevie Field
Marketing/Economic Development Coordinator
Copy: Brad Hudson
Robin Zimpfer
Sarah Mundy
Robed Moran
Teresa Gallavan
Clipboard
November 2001
www. ieep.com
REAL ESTATE SUCCESSES
Charlotte Russe, a mall-based clothing retailer, has chosen the Inland Empire for their new West
Coast/National Distribution Center. The signing of this ten-year lease consists of 217,258 square feet of
industrial space located at 1175 East Francis Street in Ontario. The total lease consideration was valued
at approximately $8 million with Charlotte Russe to occupy the premises in February 2002. The b~okerage
team, Inland Valley Partners, consisting of Frank Geraci, Wait Chenoweth, Marc Burns, and Dan de la Paz
of CB Richard Ellis represented both the lessee and lessor, Panattoni Development, in this transaction.
Sport Chalet, a Southern Califomia sporting goods retailer, has leased 326,543 square feet of space
located in Haven Gateway's industrial center at 2250 Sequoia Avenue in Ontario signing a ten-year lease.
They expect to employ 50 to 60 people in their new facility. Chuck Belden, Kyle Kehner, and Stuart
Milligan of Cushman & Wakefield Inc. represented the lessee for a deal valued at approximately $11.6
million. Source: Co-Star
Carboline Company, a St. Louis, Mo.-based manufacturer and distributor of industrial coatings and
adhesives, has expanded into a 25,841-square-foot industrial building located at 5533 Brooks Street in
Montclair. This ten-year lease was valued at $1.5 million. Kevin Frejlach, Ontario and Steve Sprenger,
Anaheim, both of Grubb & Ellis Company, represented the lessee in this transaction.
Atlanta Trading, a leading seafood trading company headquartered in Cochin, India has leased 17,369
square feet of space at 10888 San Sevaine Way in Mira Loma for five years. Paul Whitehouse, Riverside,
and Don Kazanjian and Scoff Ostlund, Ontado, all from Lee & Associates represented the lessor in this
transaction valued at approximately $500,000. Source: Co-Star
Pepsi Bottling Group Inc., is expanding its soft drink and bottling plant located at 6659 Sycamore
Canyon Blvd. in Riverside with the construction of a 40,000-square-foot warehouse and distribution facility
adding an additional 12 employees to its current work-force of about 450 people. Source: The Business
Press
AFG Insulating, one of the country's largest suppliers of construction and specialty glass, is opening a
77,392-square-foot manufacturing facility in the Hunter Highlands Corporate Park located at 813 Palmyrita
Avenue in Riverside. AFG expects to employ 40 people initially and as many as 100 within two years,
according to a statement by the City of Riverside. Source: The Business Press
CALENDAR iTEMS
To register online for SBDC events: www. iesbdc.org
November t3: Simplify your accounting with a "QuickSuccess With QuickBooks Accounting Software" (for
beginners) seminar from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. An
expert from Birdwell & Associates will conduct demonstrations on how to perform a variety of functions.
Cost is $25. For moro information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345.
November 16: IEEP is hosting their Annual Legislative Reception membership event from 5 p.m. to 7
p.m. at the Mission Inn Hotel, San Diego Room, Riverside, froe of charge. Please RSVP by Friday,
November 9, to Margie Oswald at 909.890.1090 ext. 236.
November 27: "Get the Tax Facts!" straight from the source from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. in Riverside, free of
charge. This IRS workshop is a one-day overview of federal and state tax issues for small businesses.
For moro information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345.
December 4: "Get the Tax Facts!" straight from the source from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. in Rancho Cucamonga,
froe of charge. This IRS workshop is a one-day overview of federal and state tax issues for small
businesses. For moro information call 909.466.6244
SAVE THE DATE !
Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. Mark your calendar for the IEEP Annual Installation Dinner,
"Experience the Magic of the Inland Empire," at the Riverside Convention Center! IEEP Members and
Executives from all over the Inland Empire will be entertained with mysterious fun while our 2002 IEEP
Officers and Board Members are installed. A vadety of sponsorships are available to IEEP Members. For
more information contact Margie Oswald at 909.890.1090 ext. 236.
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS
Claremont Graduate University, a graduate and doctoral university. Sandra Wada can be roached at
909.607.3689.
Lasercraft-Kraktronix, an office equipment and computer servicing and rotailer for computer, printer,
copier and fax supplies including OEM, genedc and remanufactured toners. Mark Krakower can be
roached at 909.735.9996.
Victor Valley Community College, is committed to excellence in educational programs and services that
are accessible to a diverse student population. Janet Nix can be roached at 909.245.4271.
CflECK US OUT !1!
IEEP ACTIVITY REPORT for OCTGBER
Business Development - noted six leads and 52 inquiries for a total of 67 leads year to date. The
Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) - registered 88 total days of film activity and 207 requests for
locations, with seven permits issued in San Bemardino County, eight issued in Riverside County, nine
issued for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and four issued for the US Forost Department for an
economic impact of $2,498,500. Small Business Development Center (SBDC) - reported the
creation of five jobs and the retention of 203 jobs for an economic impact of $1,659,726. The SBDC
counseled 198 clients for 900 client hours, and conducted 18 training events with 307 attendees.
International Trade - reported one export action for $582,000.
2992 INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL VISITOR r, MEETING PLANNER GUIDE
The Inland Empire Tourism Council (IETC) has selected Dragonfiyer Press of Upland to publish the
Official 2002 Inland Empire Regional Visitor & Meeting Planner Guide. This guide will provide
information for visitors, meeting planners, and residents on events, places to visit, family activities, dining,
and recreation in the Inland Empire North, Coachelta Valley, Mountains, Temecula Valley, and throughout
the rest of the Inland Empire. It will be distributed to guests at Inland Empire hotels and to Convention and
Visitors Bureaus and Chambers of Commerce throughout the Inland Empire. Additional copies will be
distributed at international travel industry trade shows, all Califomia Visitor Centers, and in response to the
IETC web site and ads in the State Visitor Guide and Sunset magazine. For information on advertising
opportunities, please contact John Bloom at 909.981.3141 or via e-mail at jbloom@uberadv.com.
FILM C9MMISSIGN UPDATE
The Inland Empire Film Commission, once again, was the facilitating film commission for the 2001
California On Location Awards. This is the only event within the film industry that recognized location
managers and scouts as well as production companies for their excellence while filming throughout
California. In addition to the industry being recognized, the public employees at the city, county, state, and
federal level are also recognized for their outstanding service to the industry.
We are extremely proud that our region had a finalist in the County Employee of the Year category for
2001, Dave Slaughter, Real Property Manager, Department of Building Services for the County of
Riverside. Dave was chosen from 23 other county employees statewide for his professionalism and
expertise while working with three major feature films that chose the historic Courthouse in the City of
Riverside. Asa result, the City of Riverside enjoyed DreamWorks' "Time Machine," The Walt Disney
Company's "Babies in Black" and MGM's '~/Vhat's the Worst That Can Happen."
The Film Commission is currently working with DreamWorks' "Catch Me If You Can" in addition to
Universal Pictures "The Hulk" and Paramount Pictures "Star Trek" along with the popular TV series '¥Vest
Wing," "National Geographic," "l'he Discovery Channel," numerous smaller feature films, commercials,
and of course, still photographers.
ECGNOMIC FORECAST BREAKFAST
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) will hold its 15th Annual Regional Economic
Forecast Conference, the only conference to examine the short-term economic outlook for the six-county
Southern California region. The primary objective of this year's conference will be to examine the impacts
of the September 11t~ tragedy on the Southern California region. The conference will also include an
assessment of the potential impacts on trade, air travel, and other economic factors. The event will take
place on November 16, 2001, from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Huntington Library in San Marino. For
more information, please contact Gale Kindberg of Cerrell Associates at 323.466.3445 or
~3alet~cerrell.com.
DIAMOND VENTURE FGRUM
The 6t~ Annual Diamond Venture Forum was a great success with approximately 130 people in attendance
at the Mission Inn in Riverside to hear eight companies present their business plans and investment
opportunity. The event had very good interest from the investors with many first time attendees
representing Ignite Capital, Pasadena Angels, and Oak Tree Ventures. The presentations were followed
by a lively networking reception. Eady feedback from the presenters is that nearly each company reported
interest from several investors at the event. The next Diamond Venture Forum Luncheon is tentatively
scheduled for March 2002, with next year's annual event to be held on October 17, 2002.
'READING BY 8' COMES TO TIlE INLAND EMPIRE
Reading by 9 comes to the Inland Empire through the five county child literacy initiative lead by the Los
Angeles Times. Reading by 9 Partners, along with the Inland Empire Reading Council and the San
Bemardino County Office of Education are working together in the distribution of new kindergarten-
through-third grade books donated by Scholastic, Inc. to teachers throughout Riverside and San
Bemardino Counties during the month of November with each county receiving approximately 20,000
books. Another larger book distribution will occur in March 2002, when books collected from the 2001
Reading by 9 Holiday Book Drive are disseminated. TS Express in Ontado and US Express in Colton
have generously offered their facilities in the distribution of these books.
The Reading by 9 Volunteer Program welcomed the first Riverside County volunteers at Manuel L. Real
Elementary School in Perds at a three-hour training session on Wednesday, October 3. The Ontario City
Library located at 215 East "C" Street, Ontado, will be the site of free training for new Reading by 9
volunteers on Saturday, November 10, from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Cucamonga Elementary, Mission
Elementary, and Ontario Center School are still in need of volunteers. For more information regarding
Reading by 9 and the Reading by 9 Volunteer Program please call 213.625.6080 or
readingby9@lausd.k12.ca.us.
IE-T6ehCBI6ndBr . . INLANB EMPIRE'S TECBNOLOGY CALENBAR
The technology division of the Inland Empire Economic Partnership has launched an on-line technology
calendar. This web-based calendar lists technology-related events throughout the Inland Empire region.
In addition, this calendar also lists all Inland Empire Small Business Development Center activities. By
clicking on the title of an event, the user is presented with an organized and detailed synopsis of the
particular event. To locate the IE-TechCalendar, go to the IEEP website (www. ieep.com), and click on the
"Inland Empire Technology Division" icon. Click on the "calendar" icon in the top left comer of the
technology division web page. To submit an event for the IE-TechCalendar, please e-mail Bdan Underhill
at bunderhill~,ieep.com.
www. ieep.com
INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP
,-~ Season's Greetings
and
Thank You
to all our members for your continued support
Experience
the Magic
of the'
Inland Empire
The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) is holding its "16th Annual Presentation Dinner"
Thursday, January 31, 2002, 6:00 p.m.
Riverside Convention Center '~
"~ 3443 Orange Street, Riverside
Please join us in saluting IEEP's outgoing Chairman, Arnold Dickson with the Gas Company
and in welcoming our new Chairman, George M. Reyes with Best Best & Krieger. IEEP Members and
Executives from all over the Inland Empire will be amazed with the magic of The Great Alexander Raguzi.
For more information, reservations, or sponsorship opportunities, please contact .,~
Margie Oswald at 909.890.1090 ext. 236 or moswald@ieep.com.
REAL ESTATE SUCCESSES
(The ~EEP reports monthly on significant real estate transactions that occurred with or without the assistance of IEEP, in order to provide leads to our members.)
Danone Waters, a bottler and distributor of brand name drinking water products, has leased 348,211
square feet of industrial space located at 14326 Monte Vista Blvd. in Chino. Total consideration for the
five-year deal is $6.7 million. Danone expects to employ approximately 12 people, which will grow to
22 during peak summer months. Jim Koenig of CB Richard ~Ellis represented the lessee in this
transaction. Source: Co-Star and The Business Press
Giant Wholesale Inc. has signed a seven-year lease for a 43,428-square-foot industrial building
located at 2929 Kansas Avenue in Riverside. Bruce Springer of Grubb & Ellis Company represented
both the lessee and the lessor, Kansas Avenue Investment Co., in this transaction valued at $950,000.
Source: Co-Star
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Indianapolis-based Guidant
Corp., has signed a $1.9 million deal to occupy 66,280 square feet at 42301 Zevo Drive in Temecula.
This three-year transaction represents one of the largest lease transactions in Southwest Riverside
County this year. Source: Co-Star
Jerry and Ann Atkinson of Center Chevrolet purchased Holiday Oldsmobile-Mazda, located on 4.5
acres at 388 So. E Street in San Bernardino and plans to rename it Mazda of San Bernardino. The
Atkinson's will have 10 to 14 sales people and four managers at its new dealership, up from its current
level of six sales people and two managers. Source: The Press-Enterprise
Ross Stores Inc., a distributor of clothing apparel, plans to build a $100 million national warehouse
on 83 acres located on the southwest corner of Indian Avenue and Morgan Street in Perris. The 1.3
million-square-foot distribution center is expected to.eventually provide up to 1,100 new jobs. Source:
The Business Press
Mercury General Corp., a Los Angeles-based insurance provider, plans to build a 100,000-square-
foot office building on Foothill Blvd. between Spruce and Elm Avenues in Rancho Cucamonga. The
insurance group plans to hire 50-75 employees to work in a temporary Rancho Cucamonga claims
office until the Foothill Blvd. office opens in December of 2002. As the group grows they plan to hire
an estimated 700 people. Source: The Sun
Volkswagen of America Inc. opened a warehouse and distribution facility located at 3095 E. Cedar
Street in Ontario bringing with it 125 jobs. The 343,000-square-foot facility will serve 127 Volkswagen
and 69 Audi dealerships in the Western United States. Source: The Business Press
Kohl's, a retail department store specializing in housewares and apparel, plans to begin construction
on a 651,000-square-foot warehouse in January. Kohl's first West Coast distribution center is expected
to create 700 jobs when it opens and 400 more bY the time construction is finished and will serve as
a regional distribution center for Kohl's stores in California, Nevada, and Arizona. Source: The Sun
WELCOME 19EW MEMBER
Swiftcomm, Inc., a provider of high-speed broadband service. Richard Liuag, CEO and President,
can be reached at 909.784.3500.
CALENDAR ITEMS
To register online for SBDC events: www. iesbdc.org
January 15, 22, 29: "Develop Your Plan For Success", this three-week, comprehensive seminar
provi, des a solid basis for creating your business plan. This seminar is being held from 9 a.m. to 12
p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. Cost is $40. For more information
contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345.
January 17: What you don't know can hurt you! "Payroll Tax" is a seminar presented by the California
Employment Development Department (EDD) and the IRS from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. in Rancho
Cucamonga, free of charge. For more information call 909.466.6244.
January 22: A one-day seminar entitled "How to Succeed in a Home-Based Business" is being
offered from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. in Moreno Valley. Cost is $20. For more information contact Melanie
Cote at 909.781.2345.
January 24: Want to increase your bottom line? Attend the "Marketing Your Small Business"
workshop and learn how to increase sales, profitability, and efficiently manage your marketing dollar.
This workshop is being held from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. in Palm Springs. Cost is $15. For more information
call 760.864.1311.
January 30: Simplify your accounting with a "QuickSuccess With QuickBooks Accounting Software"
(for beginners) seminar from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. in Victorville. An expert from Birdwell & Associates will
conduct demonstrations on how to perform a variety of functions. Cost is $25. For more information
call 760.951.1592.
January 31: The "Marketing Your Small Business" workshop is being held from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. in
Murrieta. Cost is $20. For more information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345.
SAVE THE DATE. 5'h AlglgUAL GOLF CLASSIC
The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) will be holding its "5'h Annual Golf Classic" at
the Arrowhead Country Club located at 3433 N. Parkside Drive, San Bernardino on Monday, April 22,
2002, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. For more information, reservations, or sponsorship opportunities,
please contact Margie Oswald at 909.890.1090 ext. 236 or moswald~eep.com.
CHECK US OUT
IEEP ACTIVITY REPORT tot 190VEMBER
Business Development - noted one lead and 17 inquiries for a total of 69 leads year to date. The
Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) - registered 93 total days of film activity and 189 requests
for locations, with 32 permits issued in San Bernardino County, 15 issued in Riverside County, and
three issued for the US Forest Department for an economic impact of $2,052,300. Small Business
Development Center (SBDC) - reported the creation of seven jobs for an economic impact of
$3,368,000. The SBDC counseled 138 clients for 782 client hours, and conducted 19 training events
with 263 attendees.
ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE RECEPTION
The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) held its 'Annual Legislative Reception' at the
beautiful Mission Inn Hotel on Friday, November 16, 2001, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Approximately 70 people were in attendance, including State Senator Nell Soto and many of her staff
plus a number of Field Representatives from the offices of State Senator Jim Brulte, Congressman Joe
Baca, Congresswoman 'Mary Bono, Congressman Ken Calvert, Assemblyman Russ Bogh,
Assemblyman Dennis Hollingsworth, and Assemblyman Rod Pacheco.
Also in attendance were local city and county elected officials, pi'us a number of IEEP members.
We would like to say thank you and express our appreciation for the continued support of our members
and local elected officials.
Mark your calendars now for next year's reception that will be held on November 15, 2002, from 4:00
p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Mission Inn.
Please send materials for consideration to Diane Evans. Submissions can be sent by e-mail to devans@ieep.com, or by
fax to (909) 890-1088. All materials should be received by the last Friday of each month.
INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP
301 East Vanderbilt Way, Suite 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
(909) 890-1090 Fax (909) 890-1088
rooms@ ieep.com - www.ieep.com
Gtoria Wotnick
City of TemeCUla
p.O. Box 9033
'TemeC~Jla, CA 925B9-9033
Population: 91,900 in city, 409,000 in
county.
Climate: High Low
January 65 43
July 75 55
Cost of living: Above average )specific
index not availablel.
Average price of a new home:
S480,000 in the ci~ S280.000 in the
county.
Security: 33.2 crimes per 1,000 resi-
dents, lower than the national average
of 42.7 crimes per 1,000 residents.
In[ormation: Santa Barbara Region
ChamDer of Commerce, 12 E. Carritlo St.,
Santa Barbara, CA 93101, (805) 965
3023 or w~wv. sbchambe~org.
Ten years ago Temecula wasn't big
enough or sufficiently populated to
bother with incorporation. Today it's
one of the fastest growing cities in CaF
ifornia -- and one of the pre~iest.
Set in a long, green valley with
snowcapped mountains visible in the
distance, its historic Old Town, east of
interstate 15, has the Western appeal
of Tombstone, AZ. West of the inter-
state, a 21st-century city of sparkling
new commercial buildings and state-
of-the-art housing developments is
slowly spreading across the rolling
landscape,
Linda and Bill Cole, natives of the
Midwest, came to a neighboring town
for a funeral, drove through Temecula
and were so captivated by its small-
town Westem atmosphere and warm,
friendly people that they vowed they
would someday return here to live.
"It's a very conscientious place,"
Linda says. "The town is growing rap-
idly, but there's plenty of room for
growth in the countryside, and offi-
cials are planning well. We've never
been happien"
Population: 58,650 in Ci~ 1,300,000
in county.
Climate: High Low
January 69 46
July 92 61
Cost of living: Above average {specific
index not available).
Average price of a new home:
S258,000
Security: 31.3 crimes per 1,000 resi-
dents, lower than the national average
of 42.7 crimes per 1,000 residents.
Information; Temecula Valley Chamber
54 WHERE TO F~'TIRE
of Commerce, 27450 Ynez Road, No.
124, Temecula, CA 92590. )909) 676-
5090 or www. temecula.org.
Fort Collins, Colorado
It's lmrd to improve on a city with a
major educational institution such as
Colorado State University and
panoramic views of the beautiful snow-
capped Rocky Mountains. But there's
more. A wide, clean fiver flows through
its coqoorate limits, and there's a strong,
diversified economy, outstanding cul-
tural amenities and an active, involved
populace intent on finding ways to
keep these prized features intact.
Jack and Camille Trolla left the
smog, traffic and wall-to-wall people
of Southern California to spend their
retirement years in Fort Collins. Millie
describes it as "the best decision we
ever made."
"Its dean air and warmhearted, hos-
pitable people" are the main reasons
she likes the city, she says. "We love to
get up in the mornings and see the
beautiful blue sky and white clouds
floating by."
Outdoors the Trollas enjoy photog-
raphy, collecting fossils, flying radio-
controlled airplanes and hiking on
trails around Fort Collins and in Rocky
Mountain National Park. When they
aren't enjoying the outdoors, they
build model planes and trains, attend
concerts by the Fort Collins Symphony
and drive to Denver for plays.
Population; 109,000 in city, 200,000 in
county.
Climate; High Low
January 41 14
July 86 57
Cost of living: 106, based on national
average of 100.
Average price of a new home:
5218,000
Security: 43.6 crimes per 1,000 resF
dents, higher than the natJonal average
of 42.7 crimes per 1,000 residents.
information: Fort Collins Chamber of
Commerce, 225 S. Meldrum. Fort Collins,
CO 80521, {970} 482-3746 or wvwv.
fcchamber, org.
Boca Raton, Florida
Empowered by the will and deter-
mination of an enlightened citizenry,
protected by effective land-use plan-
ning and comprehensive zoning laws,
and transformed by a highly success-
ful downtown redevelopment pro-
gram in the '90s, Boca Raton is one of
the most beautiful cities in the world.
By focusing on zero traffic conges-
tion and technology to advance quali-
ty of life as two major issues to be
addressed in the early years of the
new millennium, the "city within a
park" has announced its intentions to
remain "Beautiful Boca" -- and a
beautiful place to live.
Stan and Gladys Pedstein retired
here from Philadelphia. "We are enjoy-
CO
posh counu¥ club conmaunities (each
with /ts own championship golf
course), fashionable upscale bou-
tiques, designer shops and indoor
malls, and streets named for Holly-
wood stars contribute to the glitz and
glamour of this playground of the rich
and famous.
Not that you have to be rich and
famous to live here. Sheldon and Ruth
Esko decided to retire here from
Chicago in 1998 after vacationing in
the ama tbr 15 years. To their delight,
they found that a home could be
bought for half the price of a shnilar
home in their old neighbothood. "Cost
of living is very reasonable for a city
that has everything," Sheldon says.
"It's a little warm in sunm~er," says
Ruth, searching for something that
isn't perfect about the city. "Palm
Desert is a wonderful place to retire. It
has a very active social climate. Its res-
idents have a youthful outlook and
are always looking for new things to
do. And there's no limit to things to
do. We have wonderful theater, muse-
runs and schools. Volunteering oppor-
tunities abound."
Population: 40,000 in city 1,300,000
in COUn ky.
Climate: High Low
Janua~/ 70 38
July 107 77
Cost of living: Above average )specific
index not available).
Average price of a new home:
S354,000
Security: 64.23 crimes per 1,000 resk
dents, higher than the national average
of 42.7 crimes per hO00 residents.
Infom~atJon: Palm Desert Chamber of
Commerce, 73-710 Fred Waring Drive,
Suite 114, Palm Desert, CA 92260, (760)
346.511 I or vwvw. pdcc.org
San Juan Capistrano,
California
A gentle offshore breeze from the
Pacific Ocean -- only a mile away --
keeps surmner and winter tempera-
tures in this picturesque little village at
a comfortable shirtsleeves level.
Streets are filled with visitors who
come from around the world to see
historic, much-acdaimed Mission San
Juan Capiswano, Residents go about
their daily lives in a town little
changed by time.
Fom~er mayor Gil Jones credits a
city council initiative 25 years ago for
the low annual growth rate and
expansive open spaces that have kept
the town impervious to the over-
crowding experienced by many
Southern California communities.
Les and Marie Blair say they looked
all over Southern California before set-
tling in San Juan Capistmno seven
years ago. "We love the town, its near-
ness to the ocean, the friendly people,
the mission and historical aspects,"
Marie says.
"We work with patients with
Alzheimer's disease and the Special
Olympics, deliver for Mean on Wheels,
answer Santa's letters from children
and pa~icipate in the United Way and
the Seniors Club," Les says, describing
one aspect of their active lifestyle.
"We mn every day, swim in the
ocean, do aerobic exercises and win
dance contests," Marie laughs, describ-
ing another. "I'11 stay here forever," Les
says.
Population: 32,500 in city 2,450,000
in county.
Climate: High Low
Januag/ 65 50
July 89 73
Cost of living: Above average (specific
index not available).
Average price of a new home:
S386,000
Security: 18.1 crimes per I,O00 resi-
dents, lower than the national average
of 42.7 crimes per 1,000 residents.
Information: San Juan Capistrano
Chamber of Commerce, I?O. Box 1878,
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92693, 1949)
493-4700 or www. sanjuanchamber.
com.
Santa Barbara, California
Santa Barbara, one of the most
beautiful and expensive towns in
America, is largely the product of an
architectural policy on construction,
plantings and preservation established
more than 75 years ago and scrupu-
lously followed by subsequent city
administrations.
Ensconced between mountains and
seashore, its east-west alignment on
the Pacific coastline provides a
Mediterranean Riviera-type setting.
Noted for its upscale cultuFal scene, its
year-round temperate climate fosters a
wide range of outdoor sports and
recreational activities as well.
Barbara Lockett, a widow, moved
from Albany, NY, in 1994 with some
trepidation. "Housing costs are two to
three times what they are in Albany,"
she says. But she was pleased to learn
that "general living expenses are not
prohibitive.
"We have some polluted beaches,
the water tastes terrible, the trans-
portation system has problenzs, but
I'm still convinced it's the best place in
the world to live," she says with
unfeigned enthusiasm.
of the San Bernardino mountains.
Call for details and schedule.
909-866-3437
How To's on the Forest.
Experts present a series of one hour
or longer talks, workshops and
demonstrations to enhance your
adventure in the forest. How-To's
are on Saturdays, with fees to cover
materials. Call 909-866-3437 for
topics, dates and times.
The Discovery Center is a
state-of-the-art Visitor Center and
environmental education facility
and is a prototype for urban forest
Visitor Centers around our country.
The non-profit San Bernardino
National Forest Association man-
ages the facility in a unique part-
nership with the U.S. Forest
HEMET
Americana RV Park
1190 N Palm, 909-925-3010
.~ ,..~ Florida Avo, ~3.
,,~ 0 Acacia Ave
~ HEMET ~
~tetson Ave
CASA del SOL R.V. RESORT
Daily, weekly & monthly rates. Group discounts avail
Across from WaFMad, close to golf. 2750 W. Acacia
Hemet 92545. (888) 925-2516 · Fax (909) 925-8533.
www.casadelsoJrvpark.com
GOLDEN VILLAGE PALMS see ad in this section
MOUNTAIN VALLEY RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK
Florida Ave ~l~
~ 0 Acacia Ave
~ ~ ~ALLE¥ ~ ~
~ HEME' ~
~tetson Ave
5-Star park wdh 171 lull booN-ups and mature trees
on eac~ site. TL raled 8.5/10/9.
235 So. Lyon Ave., Hemet, ~A 92543
(800) 926-5593 · Fax (909) 658-6272.
IDYLLWILD/SAN JACINTO
MOUNTAIN
CENTER
Hurkey Creek
unly P
'VALLEY
HURKEY CREEK COUNTY PARK
59 acres, 91 developed sites. Hiking, group
camping. Reservations required.(gO0)234-7275.
P~lnler 0]/02
Service. More than 140 volunteers
help to keep the center running and
even expanding.
The new exhibit hall will house
a microcosm of the San Bernardino
Mountains and demonstrate the rich
natural, historical and social stories
of the region.
The Discovery Center is a great
source for information about recre-
ation all year-round in the San
Bernardino National Forest.
They can help with:
All Forest Service permits
Adventure passes
Hiking and biking information
and maps
Camping information
Maps of forest roads
Discovery points and
adventures
Self-guided trails -
including historic
Holcomb Valley
Special group tours
Snowshoe rentals and touring
information
Off-highway vehicle maps and
information
Also at the Discovery Center is
the Adventure Outpost, a unique
shopping experience. An extensive
selection of maps, field guides, and
informational and educational
books on hiking, biking, camping,
skiing, and anything else you might
want to do in the forest is available.
Unique, quality nature-themed
gifts, home accessories, jewelry,
toys and games and Smokey the
Bear memorabilia are here too.
909-866-3437
TEMECULA - 16TM Annual
Rod Run 2002, Feb 16-17. Old
Town Temecula rumbles and roars
from more than 800 classy chassis
and street rods during the Temecula
Rod Run classic weekend. Hot
THE PAINT
We repair any body damage
on your Moto]-holWa-e from a l~lillor
scratch to a n~ajor collision and
paint it with the original factory paint ! ! !
For accident dunnage repair or to completely
repaint your R.V.
Call us at:
BOO 544-5:0'33
73 []
L
rods, muscle cars, street rods, and
vintage autos line the quaint streets
of Old Town Temecula. Some auto-
mobiles date back to the 1930s.
Many of the vehicles have values
exceeding $ I00,000.
On Saturday, the Rod Run con-
tinues until 5pm, with a Poker Run
cruise from 9am-noon. In the Poker
Run, classic autos tour the streets
of Temecula in search of a winning
hand. There is a Poker Walk for
those who don't have a hot rod to
blast around town in, on Saturday
and Sunday mornings. The "Show
and Shine" takes place on Sunday
from 9am-5pm with awards cere-
mony at 3pm. Admission is free.
909-676-4718
RIVERSIDE - Dickens
Festival 2002, Feb 1-3 in down-
town Riverside. Come and enjoy
educational, family-oriented, liter-
ary entertainment and activities
.MOUNTAIN CENTER
IDYLLWILD COUNTY PARK
202 acres, camping, equestrian trail,
hiking/interpretive trail, picnic facilities.
Reservations recommended. (800) 234-7275.
such as plays, dramatic and musical
performances, pageants, living
history presentations, workshops,
lectures, classroom study, exhibits
and a street bazaar with I:¥ee
entertainment, vendors and cos-
tumed characters.
Eleven original adaptations of
Charles Dickens' works and related
subjects have been produced by the
Riverside Dickens Festival.
Marionette plays are presented and
Queen Viotoria and Gordon
Highlander Parade
numerous events are added each
year. Some of these are Queen
Victoria and her Royal Court, Mn
Fezziwig's Victorian Ball, Victorian
MOUNT SAN JACINTO STATE PARK
Idyllwild Campground
Stone Creek Campground
909-659-2607, Res: 800-444-7275
26350ROYAL909 659-26910elan°PINES DriveRV ,PARKp. o. Box 277, Idyllwild, CA 92549
LAKE ELSINORE
LAKE ELSINORE WEST MARtNA& RV RESORT
See ad on the fo/lowing page
Clubs & Groups Welcome
Large & Small
[] 74
1-800-323-9 1 /
3600 West Florida Ave., Hemet, CA 92545
Website: www.goldenvillagepalnls.corn
E-mail: goldenr v@ sunlanO rvresor ts.corn
Celtic Dancers
teas, costume and fashion shows
and contests, Pub Night, a mini-
faire for children, street entertain-
ment and more. Vendors and craft
demonstrators sell wares at the
London Marketplace on the streets
in front of Riverside's historic
buildings. 800-430-4140 or 909-
781-3168. www. pe.net/dickens ·
RIVERSIDE
RANCHO JURUPA PARK
350 acres in a peaceful seRipg near dowotown Riverside.
70 sites w/electricity. Fishing, hiking, picnickiog, equestri-
an trails, group areas. Close to Jensen-Aivarado Historic
Ranch & Louis Robidoux Nature Center (909)684-7032.
Drop in or make reservations: (800) 234-7275.
SAGE
:909) 767-01
SAN BERNARDINO
GLEN HELEN REGIONAL PARK I
44 RV sites. 2555 Devore Hd.,San Bernardino CA.
I
909-880-2522.
WItERE
Volume 6, Number 11
Visit WHERE Magazine on the Web at http://www. WhereOC.com
December 2001
Co yc Coed¢ .
I J DA HAUSEI
ThE Sr. Ptt s MONA C BeACU
Linda Hauser latows th,
value of being organized.
She recently relocated
from the Hilton Waterfront
Beach & Tennis Resort to
The St. Regis Monarch
Beach Resort and Spa. "1
knew what I was getting
into," she admits. "l went
from a well-established
comfort zone into a brand
new work in progress," she
admits. "But, I couldn't be
happier about my decision.
LindaHauser, concierge a; Ti~e ! am So fortunate to be a
St. Regis Monarch Beach. pal't of this new venture."
Linda began her hospi-
tality career as a corporate travel agent for
McDonnell-Doug]as, where she ,~ranged airline and
hotel acconmtodafions for the company's manage-
ment personnel. McDonnell-Douglas relocaled to
Arizona and offered Linda a position thare, but she
couldn't leave her beloved beach atmosphere. Thanks
to her travel agent experience, she landed a concierge
position al the Hilton W, aterfront hotel, where she
worked for eight years. 'The Hilton Waterfront is a
great place to learn the a~t of being a concierge, and
the guests and staff are such a pleasure to work with,"
Linda says. "However, I was at the point in my career
where I was i~ady for a new challenge, so 1 decided to
lake a position at the new St. Regrs Hotel. The last
month or so has definitely been a roller-coaster ride,
but it has all been worth il!"
What specific challenges have you encountered in
your new environment, Linda? "Well, for the first
time in my life, I have had to le,°a'n to operate on a
paperless level. Everything at our desk s computer-
ized. and all of our information is at our fingertips in a
database. So. le,'tming the new system has been quite
SAVE THE DATE
· January 7: Ti~e Orange County Conderge Assodafion
hosts its money meefng at The St. Regis Monarch Beach
Reso~ & Spa. Please RSVP by f~x for ~he meetlng only to
Ginny Wekall at (714) 847-6784. A special room rote of
$129.00 will be exlended to members of the Assecialionfor the
eveniug of January 7 only, courtesy of The St. Regis.
Reservations nmst be made by December 15, 2001. Please
htfonn the resen~Jonist that you are a member of the Oreatge
Counly Co~wierge Association to obtaht the special mte.
NEWS
· Noted res~aur~eur Antonio Cagnoto of Antone~o Risto~ante
& Ne~o Cudna now operates his rough estab~hmem at Soath
Coast Plaza. Folxnerly Armani Cafe, Quattro Cafe (also
known as Q4), officially changed names September 15th.
Cagno]o says lhete ~ll be some so hil~ change~ to b~h lhe menu
and interior design of the reskaurant to reflect his "signatme
touch". Quatlro Cafe offers 84 seats in its main dining ~om
· The End~ssy Suites Anaheim South officially opened on
November 5, 2001. The new properly boasts 375 suites and
11,000 sq. ft tctal meeting space.
· The Anaheim Mardolt Suites opens January 2002. ,and ~411
offer 371 guesl suites specifica~!y designed for fl~e l~rgine,~s Im~
eler pl~ l 0~000 sq. fi. total meeting space.
2002 Service Excellence Awards
Tim O~mlge Comay Tourism Council's Service Exce~ence
Awards will take place on April 1, 2002 at The St- Regis
Monarch Beach Resort & Spa. Call (714) 278-7491 for more
infonnalJon and to o~ain nomination carOs for your guests.
Concierge Comments:
Tracie Berger. Editor
Concierge News
125 E. Baker Sl~eet, Suite 250
Costa Mesa CA 92626
Phone: (714) 825-1700 Fax: (714) 825-1710
E-mail: t racie.berger @ WhereOC.com
FIVE STAR RESOURCES
AT-EASE MEN S STORE
Need a great place to send your male shopping connoissems? Lonk no fu:lher than
at-ease! Located at Fashion Island, at-ease offem the latest fashions f~' men in a com-
fo~able, professional environment
m-ease Men's Store featmes popular designem such as Zanella, Bobby Jones,
Cutter & Buck, B~3, Bdcken. Reyn Spooner and Robert Comsttrk Slx~swe,~.
Eveq,thing from suit jackets and ties to belts and shoes can be found in both drossy
and casml stytes.
ment,~y shipping within the U.S. and pomml shopping assisamce. Visit at-ease's
website at www,at..~ase.com for ad~tional infommfion.
at-ease, Fashion Island, Newport Beach, (949) 759-7979
BLACK GOLD GOLF CLUB
Ase yovx guests looldng for an outstanding goff course with challenging
holes and "commy club" service? Send them to Black Gold Golf Club in
Yorba Linda! Black Gold is Orange Cotmty's newest premiere goff
cotme. Designed by Arthur Frills, Black Gold's l~r 72 layota metches up
to 6,756 yams and incoqx)mtes several water features, slight elevation
chm~ges, roiling tfiiis, swategic bunkering'and inc~dlble vistas overlooldng '
Orange Co~mty and Chino Hills Stale ~ Golfers can view the Pacific
Ocean, Catalina Island and the Disneyland Resorl from several points
along the co~wse.
Black Gold features a regal 20.000 square foot: clubhouse and a fully lighted practice facility. ~he staff is eager to cater to gues~'
~xis in a friendly, acconmmdating roamer. For more information about green fees, golf lessons, specialty clinics and event facilities
at Black Gold GoffC]ub, visit '~wew.blaolcgo~.olf, eom or call Eric Lolnnan. Manketing Di~ctor, at (714) 96141060.
Black Gold Golf Club, 17681 Lakeview Ave., Yorba Linda, (714) 9~1-0060
CYl OF TEMECULA' . :-
Only 61 n~es southeast of Orange County and 90 miles southeast of Los Angeles
lies Wine Co~mt~y Temecula. the heml of Culifomia's South Coast Wine Region. 15
world-.cless wineries, sumise ch,~ balloon flights, historic Old Town show, m-
ing 640 antique dealers, unlimlted shopping and fine dirdng me just a few of the indul.
gem plea~m~s wailing for vi,sim
The City of Temecula featm'es special events each month for locals and ',~ito~ to
enjoy, such as Old Town Ten~xxfla's Dicke~ Christmas (v~ekends, Nov. 24-Dec.
23). the W~megmwers W'mter Banel Tasting (Feb. 9-10, 2002) and the lob Annual
Temecula Rod Run (Feb. 16-17, 2002). In ,xl0~fion to the city's events, the Temecula
Valley Winegrower's Association sponsors ever~s such as the Vintners Golf Classic
and the Temecula V,'dley Wine Auction. For more information about the city of
Temecula's wineries and amaclions, visit www. temeetfla.org and www.temeeulawlnes, ovg.
Ten.mia Valle.v Chamber of Commerce, (909) 676-5090 or (888) TI~VIECULA
ORANGE COUNTY
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~:E
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic~
January 22, 2002
Monthly Depadmental Report
The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring
during December of 2001. The Police Department responded to forty "priority one" calls for service
during the month of December, with an average response time of approximately 4.3 minutes. A total
of 3,438 calls for police service were generated in the Cityof Temecula during the month.
During the month of December the Temecula Police Department's Town Center Storefront served a
total of 1 $7 customers. Fifty-seven sets of fingerprints were taken, fifteen people filed police reports,
eight people had citations signed off and five oversize vehicle permits were issued. Crime
Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community-oriented
programs during the month. Officer Fanene conducted a Crime Prevention workshop/presentation.
He also coordinated requests for patrol ride-a-longs. Additionally, he continued to provide
residential and business security surveys/visits and past crime follow-up. Officer Fanene also
continued to process City Planning Department submissions of site plans/conditions.
The POP Teams continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi-Housing" project. At this time there is
70% compliance with this program across the City. The teams continued their Warrant
Apprehension Program during the month, which resulted in two felony arrests and eighteen
misdemeanorarrests. The POPTeams continued with their proactive patrolefforts and madefour
additional felony arrests and thirty misdemeanor arrests during the month of December. Additionally,
the POP Teams worked many long hours of surveillance, attempting to identify and locate the
suspect(s) responsible for the window-smash burglaries occurring in the business district. The POP
Teams were successful in developing leads for those cases.
The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for one of the POP teams and a location to assist the
public with police services. This has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area.
During December, the Old Town Storefront served 110 customers. Six sets of fingerprints were
taken, fifteen reports were written, and four citations were signed off.
The traffic team reported that during the month of December there were 609 citations issued for
hazardous violations, 159 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 117 parking
Monthly Departmental Report
Page 2
citations were issued. During the month there were eleven injury traffic collisions, seventy-two non-
injury collisions were reported and forty-five drivers were arrested for DUI. The Neighborhood
Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in thirty-five citations being issued. This program
addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The SLAP
program (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in seventy-two citations being issued. On Sunday,
December 16th, a fatal traffic collision occurred that involved a pedestrian walking south across
Highway 79 at Jedediah Smith Road. The pedestrian and his dog were struck and killed by a
vehicle traveling eastbound on Highway 79. The investigation into the cause and the contributing
factors of the collision continues. No arrests v, ere made relating to this collision.
During the month of December, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of
185 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the
month, calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on twenty-one
misdemeanors and six felony cases for various offenses. Seventeen citations were also issued.
Officers Robles and Rupe continued to provide training to security staff during the month. The mall
officers continued to work on vehicle theft and burglary programs. Onlyone vehicle burglary and
one vehicle theft occurred during the month of December, which represents success for the POP
Teams during the holiday shopping season. The posse also increased their presence around the
mall on weekends with extra patrols of the parking areas.
The five school resource officers continued to remain active during December. They conducted a
total of fifteen school presentations. The topics of these presentations ranged from "Stranger
Danger" to "Inhalants" to "Drug Update for Teachers." The school resource officers also conducted
many counseling sessions with students. One misdemeanor arrest Dr battery, one misdemeanor
arrest of a parent for drunk in public, and two arrests for curfew violations were made during the
month. A total of thirty-two investigations/reports were conducted/written by the school resource
officers during December.
The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enfomement Program) continues to be a success in part
through its Youth Court program. Officer Sherry Adams conducted the 78th Youth Court session.
The JOLT officer assisted at other schools when needed and conducted follow-ups with parents of
juveniles in the JOLT program. Officer Adams continued to work with "at risk" juveniles throughout
the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. She also assisted the District
Attorneys Office and the Probation Department by providing training during home visits with
incorrigible/at risk juveniles. Officer Adams also made a misdemeanor arrest cfa female juvenile for
being under the influence of marijuana during the month of December.
During the month of December, the Special Enforcement Team (SET Team) of Officers Todd
Pauling and John Morin handled a total of fifteen cases. These cases resulted in twenty-one
misdemeanor and fifteen felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. This team continues to
work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. During this
month the team was involved with registering narcotics offenders and conducting parole and
probation searches. The SET officers recovered marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine and
marijuana plants during December.
Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's
staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Eric Albert and assistant coordinator
Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 474 hours of service in
December. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event
assistance and telephone answering duties.
Monthly Departmental Report
Page 3
The CommunityAction Patrol (CAP) Program began its academyon Saturday, October 20th. This
academy concluded on Saturday, December 1,2001. Some of the duties of these volunteers in the
CAP Program will be vacation checks, business checks, special events, abandoned vehicles and
traffic control. The goal of the program is high visibility, which prevents cdme from occurring. These
volunteers will also have the ability to report suspicious activities and persons directly, via police
radio, to sworn officers.
The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources
available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with
patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special
functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 159.5 hours during the month of December (52
hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temecula).
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/Ci~"~cil
Debbie Ubnosk~irector of Planning
January 22, 2002
Monthly Report
The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department in the month of December 2001.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
New Cases
The Division received 5._~4 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home
occupations and 9 applications for public hearings during the month of December. The new public
hearing cases are as follows:
Development Plan 2
Conditional Use Permit 2
Minor Conditional Use Permit 2
Product Review 3
Lot Line Adjustment 3
Substantial Conformance 1
Appeal 1
Status of Major Proiects
Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and prepare the following
cases for public hearing before the Director of Planning or Planning Commission:
Roripaugh Ranch Annexation, Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Repod and Development
Agreement - On October 17~h, the Planning Commission continued the item off-calendar. Staff
has been meeting with the applicant since then to address the Commission's concerns and
assisting the applicant in developing the project concept. The project is expected to go to
Planning Commission in April 2002. A first draft of the new Specific Plan has been submitted to
staff to review.
· Villages of Old Town Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Report
have been submitted. Staff is currently reviewing the initial proposal.
R:\monTHLY.RPT~2001\december 2001 ,doc
1
Pacific Dental Services - The applicant has submitted a proposal for a 10,927 square foot
retail/dental office building located between the Combs Medical Building and the AM/PM on
Highway 79 South. As a result of the November 15, 2001 DRC, the applicant will be submitting
revised plans.
Rancho Community Church -Application to design, construct and operate a church and school
campus on a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will include 292,745 square feet of religious and
school facilities with two four level (two story) parking structure (162,600 square feet and
380,023 square feet). The site will be developed in a number of phases beginning with a 1,500
seat, 26,927 square foot interim sanctuary with assembly room and a nursery; a two stow
226,777 square foot administration building, 17 modular classroom buildings, a 9,695 square
foot preschool, a 300 seat, 5,856 square foot chapel, two field house buildings totaling 10,000
square feet and lighted athletic fields. Future phases include permanent first through twelfth
grade classroom facilities, a gymnasium, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship center and a
parking structure. This project is located on the north side of State Highway 79 South east of
Jedidiah Smith Road. A second DRC meeting was held December 11,2001 with the applicant
and the City's Subcommittee followed by a letter with comments from all departments. Currently
awaiting response to those comments.
Mosco Lot 20 - Development Plan application to design and construct a 16,400 square foot
warehouse/office spec building on 1.52 acres. The project is located on Winchester Road
between Zevo and Colt Ct. The proposed project was submitted on June 22, 2001, and was
deemed incomplete. DRC was held on November 1, 2001, comments routed to applicant;
awaiting resubmittal.
Mosco Lot 29 - Development Plan application to design and construct an 11,600 square foot
warehouse/office spec building on .92 acres. The project is located in the vicinity of Winchester
and Diaz Road. The proposed project was submitted on June 22, 2001 with additional materials
submitted on August 17, 2001. The project was reviewed at DRC on September 27, 2001. The
applicant has not resubmitted plans as of November 13, 2001.
Paloma del Sol Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment and Tentative Tract Map
Amendment - To relocate commercial in the northeast portion of the project to the southwest
(adjacent to the other commercial). The project was approved at the January 8, 2002 City
Council Meeting.
Villages of Temecula - Development Plan proposal for a 160 unit multi-family apartment
complex with a commercial retail/office center located on the south side of Rancho California
Road, west of Cosmic Drive and east of the Moraga Road and Rancho California Road
intersection. This project also includes a General Plan Amendment, change of zone (with a
PDO) and a parcel map. The State Clearinghouse is currently circulating the initial study. A
community meeting is scheduled for January 14, 2002.
Wolf Creek General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment - The General Plan
Amendment involves relocating the sports park from Deer Hollow Road to Wolf Valley Road.
The property owner has submitted a conceptual plan to allow for a senior housing alternative on
the south half of the project. This could entail the creation of a gated senior community and may
involve the relocation of the community park to the middle portion of the project. The project is
tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission in February.
R:~rnonTHLYRP'f52001~lecember 2001 .doc
2
Romano's Macaroni Grill - Planning Application to construct a 6,900 square foot freestanding
restaurant building within Bel Villaggio Commercial Center. The project site is located at the
southwest corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearney Road. The applicant's architect
is working on preparing a revised site plan and revised building elevations to address issues
raised by staff.
Temecula Creek Village - Application for a 32.6-acre mixed-use development site containing
108,100 square feet of retail/office uses, four hundred multi-family residential units, and a
15,000 square foot day care center building. A related application (Tentative Parcel Map No.
30468 was filed to divide the site into 14 parcels for commercial and residential uses. The
project site is located at the southeast corner of State Highway 79 and Jedediah Smith Road.
DRC was held on November 1, 2001. Staff is reviewing revised plans.
Mosco Lot 34 - Development plan application to design and construct a 24,850 square foot
office/warehouse building on 1.68 acres. The project is located on the south side of Zevo Drive
approximately 2,000 feet west of Diaz Road. CEQA initial study being prepared. Letter sent to
applicant on January 3, 2002 requesting revised project plans to address completeness and
design issues.
Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Buildings- Development plan application for the design and
construction of adjacent 22,000 square foot tilt up concrete industrial building on two separate
parcels located on the north side of Winchester Road, west of Diaz Road. Project was
scheduled for October 11, 2001 DRC meeting; awaiting resubmittal.
U Stor It - A Conditional Use Permit for the design, construction and operation of a 55,950-
square foot storage facility located on Pala Road. The proposed project was submitted on
October 22, 2001 and was deemed incomplete; awaiting resubmittal.
Crystal Ridge Office Building -A Development Plan for the design, construction and operation
of a 9,990 square foot office building located at 43471 Ridge Park Drive. The proposed project
was submitted on October 16, 2001, and was deemed incomplete. Applicant resubmitted on
December 27, 2001. Planning is awaiting comments from other departments.
Village of Old Town Specific Plan - Staff is in the process of reviewing the Specific Plan and has
met with the applicant to discuss the major issues of the proiect.
Vail Ranch Center Retail Shops -Administrative Development Plan application to design and
construct five new retail shop buildings ranging from 2,500 square feet to 5,200 square feet on
separate building pads within the Vail Ranch Commercial Center located on Highway 79 South
and Redhawk Parkway. Staff is currently reviewing application for completeness and design
compatibility.
Gospel Recordings Building - Development Plan Application to design and construct a 17,500
square foot executive office building on a 41,817 square foot lot. The project is located on
Enterprise Circle North. The applicant is now redesigning the architectural elements of the
building.
R:\monTHLY.RPT~2001\december 2001 .doc
3
The Fountains at Temecula Expansion - Submitted by Fountain Glen Properties; a proposal to
design and construct an additional 102 senior apartment units on 3.4 acres. This is an
expansion of the existing Fountains at Temecula project located on the adjacent eight-acre lot.
The project is located on the northwest corner of Nicholas and Winchester Roads. Plans were
distributed to other departments for review and comment December 24, 2001, with comments
due January 15, 2002.
Linfield Christian School Master Plan - Submitted by Linfield Christian School; a Conditional
Use Permit proposal to expand the existing facility with 154,397 square feet of additional
classroom and accessory structures and a proposed 37,500 square feet of housing for a
superintendent, caretaker and facility. This project is located on the north side of Pauba Road
west of Margarita Road (behind Temecula Valley High School). Plans were submitted
December 26, 2001 and are being reviewed for completeness.
Temecula Methodist Church - Conditional Use Permit application to construct and operate a
6,489 square foot nine classroom addition to an existing church facility. The project site is
located on the east side of Margarita Road, north of Rancho Vista Road. Staff is awaiting
changes to incomplete items.
Commercial Tentative Parcel Map - Application submitted by Lowry and Assor to divide a 13.2
acre parcel into 14 commercial lots. The subject property is located at the southeast and
southwest corners of State Highway 79 South and Pala Road. Staff is awaiting additional
information items.
Small Business Assistance
Old Town Temecula Salon and Day Spa: Staff made a site visit to this proposed business on
Third Street in Old Town Temecula in order to help the new owner with tenant improvement
plans. City provided guidance in preparing materials for presentation to the Old Town Local
Review Board. New paint and signs were approved. Funding was provided through the FaCade
Improvement Program.
Country Home/Country Garden: A joint meeting between staff and the owners of this business
was held to discuss what structural plans and inspections are needed to allow the opening of
this business in December. Approval and funding of her improvements under the Fa(~ade
Improvement Program was expedited.
Welty Building Outdoor Vendor Area: Staff from the Planning, Fire and Building and Public
Works Departments held a meeting with the owner of this property on Main Street in order to
assess the impacts of his proposal. Aided owner in the development of exhibits and color
boards. Provided assistance with applications for a Development Plan and an Encroachment
Permit.
· Old Town Sunglasses and Jerky: Staff helped this new Old Town business with design concepts
and an application for FaCade Improvement Program funding for the approval of new signs.
· Massage Professionals: Worked with owner of this Old Town business in order to help her make
new color selections for her signs. The proposal was administratively approved.
· Rhythm and Brews: Staff provided assistance to the owner of this business to help his achieve a
December grand opening.
R:~monTHLY.RPT~2001~ecember 2001 .doc
4
Mercato Italiano: Application by this new business for a wall sign was expedited in order to
obtain approval from the Old Town Local Review Board and funding under the Facade
Improvement Program.
· Tropitone: Helped owner of this new business resolve a sprinkler problem with the Fire
Department and get his line up and running.
Special Event Permits
2002 Rod Run: Staff advised the Temecula Town Association (TTA) regarding its planning
application and has prepared a comprehensive site plan. Meetings are being held on a regular
basis with the TTA and all City departments involved.
Camp Del Corazon Race: Staff has assisted this organization in preparing an application for this
for a temporary use permit. Organizational meetings have been scheduIed with the organizers
and all City departments involved in order to monitor progress for this event which is scheduled
for February 23, 2001 at the Promenade Mall.
· Toys For Tots: Staff processed this permit in one day in order to accommodate organizers of this
charitable event.
· Spark of Love Toy Drive: Staff processed this permit on an emergency basis in two days due to
a late submittal of the application.
Massaqe Approvals
· Golden Touch located at 28274 Old Town Front Street was issued a one-year renewal for a
massage establishment permit on December 3, 2001.
Special Proiects & Lon.q Range Planning Activities
The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both
private and public purposes~ These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or
environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major
special projects and long range planning activities are as follows:
Housing Element Update - The City has received the comments of the State Department of
Housing and Community Development and is preparing the draft Element for the Planning
Commission's consideration. The remaining issues with HCD are local land costs, unit
affordability and their relationship to the allowable densities.
· Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan - This activity is on
hold pending the update of a General Plan Circulation Analysis.
Comprehensive General Plan Update - The Community Advisory Committee (CAC) held it's first
meeting on January 7, 2002. A second CAC meeting has been scheduled for late January. The
first community workshops were held on December 6, 2001 and January 12, 2002. The
consultant is preparing the background report for the Committee's consideration. A joint PC/CC
meeting will be set up in late January or early February.
R:~monTHLY.RPT~2001\december 2001 .doc
5
Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance - Final changes are being made prior to
scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop. This item is on hold pending
additional staff resources.
Surface Mining Ordinance - The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based
upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration.
This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
Application Fee Study - Staff has provided information to the consultant and Finance
Department about changes to our current fee schedule and is currently awaiting revised
information to be returned for the Planning Department's review.
Hillside Development Policy - The policies are being examined for integration into the draft-
grading ordinance. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
Multi-species Habitat Conservation Planning Efforts for Western Riverside County -
Councilman Naggar and Planning Staff are attending committee meetings and monitoring the
process of determining conservation reserve needs.
Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance - The Planning Commission considered this
Ordinance amendment at their February 2, 2000 meeting. This item is on hold pending staff
resources.
County Project Reviews - Staff continues to allocate significant resources to review projects
within the County and other local jurisdictions that could affect the City of Temecula.
Information regarding these projects will be forwarded under separate cover labeled Projects of
Concern.
· Southside Specific Plan - This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
· Secondary Dwelling Unit Ordinance- The City Council the Planning Commission to re-evaluate
this topic and report back to the Council after their re-consideration.
· City - Project environmental reviews and permitting:
o Butterfield Stage Road (NEPA) - Draft PES and Draft Programmatic Categorical
Exclusion have been prepared.
o Temecula Library
o Advance Acquisition Authorization for McCabe Court properties (NEPA)-Accepted
by CaITrans and Riverside County for "advance protection". Public Works is hiring
an appraiser to determine the value of the site.
o Long Valley Channel Maintenance
General Plan Amendments
Villages of Temecula, south of Rancho California Rd., west of Cosmic and east of Moraga
intersection. A community meeting is scheduled for January 14, 2002.
· Rancho Highlands Drive was continued by the City Council on September 25, 2001.
R:~monTHLY.RPT~2001\december 2001.doc
6
A request to reduce the size of Via Industria (Western Bypass Corridor) north of Avenida
Alvarado has been submitted and has been on hold pending the approval of a revised
Circulation Element.
Eli Lilly General Plan Amendment and zone change - staff has been meeting with
representatives from Eli Lilly and Guidant on a future GPA in this area. The current proposal
would only involve changing the land use designations on about half of the original project area.
Staff is currently considering different land use options for the properties facing Overland Road.
Geo.qraphic Information System (GIS) Activities
· The contract for the City's GIS Based Fire Response Program with Plant Equipment has been
executed. Staff is currently conducting hardware specifications to equip all the front line
emergency vehicles in the City.
· The IS and GIS Departments circulated an RFP for a HP 5000 60" wide plotter and awarded the
contract to the lowest bidder. A purchase order was issued and the new plotter will be delivered
in early January.
· Fire Department and GIS staff met with Riverside County GIS to discuss County-wide
coordination of data for public safety applications. It was determined that a committee
consisting of representatives of various cities, CDF/County Fire, the County SherifFs office
would be formed and would meeting every other month to discuss the long-term coordination of
GIS data including updating and accuracy issues.
· Recent mapping products include:
Vail Ranch aerial map for TCSD
Fault zone/city hall map for Fire
SDG&E map for Riverside County
Old Town Vicinity map for Redevelopment
Meadowview aerial map for Public Works
Proposed and Existing PUD locations for Planning
Environmental hazards map update for Planning
Updated the Potential Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas map
Silverhawk area map
A list of parcels and addresses of properties within the Redevelopment Area for
Redevelopment
Commercial/Industrial map for Finance
Sign Program Inventory Map
Potential sites map for Economic Development
Rod Run 2002 map for Planning/Fire Departments
Aerial maps for Public Works and the City Manager's Office
Updated Social Services directional map
Address Ranges for the Winchester Hills Tract for Public Works
Mapped all Christmas Wreath locations in Old Town using GPS unit for
Redevelopment
Prepared various vicinity, Land Use and Zoning maps for Planning
· Staff continues with ongoing data layer development and maintenance.
R:~monTHLY.RPT~001\december 2001.doc
7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC~-~
ClTYMANAGER ~--~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 22, 2002
Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public
Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of November and December, 2001.
MOACTRPT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
December 2001/January 2002
Prepared By: Amer Attar
Submitted by: William G. Hughes
Date: January 22, 2002
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1. First Street Bridge
This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction
of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The project is complete. The Notice of
Completion is going to the City Council on February 12, 2002.
2. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road- Low-flow Crossing at
Via Montezuma
This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via
Montezuma. In addition, this project will rehabilitate the street of Via Montezuma. This project is complete.
Recording a conservation easement is in progress for the mitigation of the disturbed area. Draft Document was
sent to the ACOE, Fish & Game and RWQCB for review on 10/31/01. RWQCB responded on 1/8/02 that it is
acceptable to them.
3. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III
This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of
office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, and two new
second floor restrooms. Building modifications are complete with the contractor working on punch list items
from the walk through that occurred on January 8, 2002.
4. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road
This project will widen Margarita Road from Pio Pico to Dartolo Road and re-landscape the medians from De
Portola to SR 79 South. Included with this project is the pavement rehabilitation of Phase II (Pauba Road to
Pio Pico. The contractor has completed the street work, with some minor punch list items still remaining. The
65-Working Days Maintenance period began on October 8, 2001.
5. Senior Center Expansion
The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for
recreational, office, and meeting purposes. It will include the addition of 3000 square feet of building area for
recreational, office and meeting purposes. Roofing and siding is complete along with the installation of the
interior drywall. Installation of the exterior brick veneer and interior flooring is currently underway.
Installation of the kitchen equipment and cabinetry is scheduled for mid January followed by exterior flatwork.
Scheduled completion is for early February 2002.
R:~vlonthlyActiviP/Report\Cn~200 BDecember.doc
6. AC Street Repairs - FY2001
This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct selected City streets. Cunningham Davis was awarded the
contract at the June 26 Council meeting in the amount of $117,000. The roads scheduled for construction are
Margarita Road at Avenida Cima Del Sol, Jefferson Avenue at Del Rio, Overland Drive at Commerce Center,
Enterprise Circle West at Rider Way, and Diaz Road at Rancho Way. The Contractor has completed most of
the work for this project. Minor striping and punch list items are all that remain.
7. Chaparral High School Swhnming Pool
A 25-yard x 25-meter pool will be built at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller
recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. Spray-type
play equipment will be included as an element in the base construction bid. The block work for the two
buildings is nearly complete. The underground work for the various drainage and piping systems is nearing
completion. The tile work on the two swimming pools is complete and the pool deck is under construction.
8. Emergency Generator - City Hall & City Yard
This project will install an emergency generator for City Hall. Contractor is ready to install Generator. City
waiting to present enclosure plans to Business Park Association. Upon BPA approval Construction will begin.
9. Long Canyon Detention Basin 5-yr Habitat Maintenance
Under this project, the Long Canyon Detention Basin will be planted and maintained for five years. Contractor
having trouble grading due to wet conditions, will continue grading. Irrigation system and planting should be
complete by the end of February.
10. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road
This project will re-stripe westbound Winchester Road from Ynez Road to I-15 northbound on-ramp to allow
for a better flow of traffic. This project will re-stripe Westbound Winchester Road from Ynez Road to I-15
Northbound on-ramp to allow for a better flow of traffic. Bids were opened on 11/15/01. The lowest bidder is
DBX, inc. with a bid of $32,390. The precon meeting was held on December 19, 2001. Work to start 01/26/02
(Saturday).
PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS
NONE
PROJECTS IN DESIGN
1. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road)
This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan
check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. Work is proceeding on the remainder of the
design. The approval of Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Study by RCFC & WCD has been delayed because
2 R:hMonthlyActivityReport\CIPx200 BDecember.doc
hydrology studies upstream of Wolf Creek require prior approval from RCFC & WCD. Staffwill be using an
appraiser to assist in the preparation of the real estate appraisal report.
2. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson
This project will add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at
Enterprise Circle. O'Malley Engineering Corporation has provided the design survey data. The project was on
hold and is being re-started at this time with the design.
3. Pala Road Improvements, Phase I - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Pala Road Bridge to
Wolf Valley)
Pala Road Improvements, Phase I will give Pala Road two lanes in each direction (58 feet in width) from the
Pala Road Bridge to the Pechanga Casino. It includes re-striping the entire length. This project is scheduled to
be advertised for construction bids in February.
4. Traffic Signals Modifications at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley
Two traffic signals will be modified to accommodate the road interim widening. Wildan, the City's consultant
is updating the signal modification plans. This project is scheduled to be advertised for construction bids in
February as part of the Pala Road Improvements, Phase I project.
5. Margarita Road Widening, Phase II (Interim), Pauba Road to Pio Pico
This project will widen Margarita Road on an interim bases between Panba Road and Pio Pico. As a result,
Margarita Road will have four lanes throughout City limits. The City Council approved plans and
specifications and authorized solicitation of bids on January 8, 2002. Project will be advertised for construction
bids during next period.
6. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek
This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide four additional traffic lanes.
The consultant has recently completed additional subsurface investigation work and has determined that there
is a potential for lateral spreading. As a result the Consultant is currently revising a portion of the bridge
foundation design to mitigate the findings. 90% drawings will be submitted this month.
7. Temecula Library
A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just
west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. The
design is progressing on schedule. Architect is finishing the final plans. A separate parcel is being created for
the library (Plat & Description) for bond purposes. Utility services construction will be coordinated with Pauba
Road, Phase II Street Improvements.
8. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road)
This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The
project is in design and the work is being coordinated with design of the library project. 100% design plans
and specs will be submitted to the City for review shortly. All utility issues are being addressed. Work is being
coordinated with design of the library project.
3 R:XMonthlyActivityReport\C1PX200 l\December.doc
9. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz
This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz
Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening of Overland Drive
from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Murdeta Creek
to Diaz Road. PDC has completed the alignment study and staff has reviewed copies of the preliminary plans.
Staff sent comments to the consultant regarding the negative declaration to revise the environmental
documents. Phases 2, 3 & 4 of the Design will begin next month pending council approval.
10. New Temecula Sports Complex
A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built on Pala Road at Wolf Valley. The new location of the complex
is on Pala Road, near Wolf Valley. The soils report indicated substantial and costly removals. Staff is
evaluating options on preparing the site or choosing a different site. The consultant, RJM Design is finishing
up the preliminary master plan of the sports complex.
11. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site
A full service fire station will be constructed in the Wolf Creek development area. Initial construction drawings
to be submitted by the end of February 2002
12. Diaz Road Realignment
Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business
Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. City staff is currently designing the project. Anticipated design
completion is scheduled for April 2002.
13. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center
The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the
Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to
improve traffic circulation. The design is 90% complete with the exception of the landscaping. Landscaping
design is currently at 70% completion. Bidding is scheduled for February 2002.
14. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes)
This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of way
acquisition at the northeast corner of Rancho California and Ynez is in the process of being done. In-house
design is 95% complete.
15. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to Pala Road)
The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk, landscaping, and irrigation along State
Route 79 South between Pala Road and Old Town Front Street. The design consultant and contract agreement
was approved at the November 27 Council meeting. A kick-off meeting was held and associated documents
have been received from the County in order to begin the design process.
16. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula's City Limits
and Diaz Road Extension
This study will determine the alignment and location of the Munieta Creek crossing between Winchester Road
to the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz Road Extension alignment
4 R:~MontlflyAcfivityRcport\Cl~200 l~December.doc
study and design. Coordination with the City of Murdeta, Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is
necessary. The Consultant and Staff met with Riverside County Flood Control to discuss possible alignments.
The consultant is currently awaiting data from Riverside County Flood Control in order to complete the work
on the first draft of the alignment study.
17. Bridge Barrier Rail Upgrade, Rainbow Canyon Road over Pechanga Creek/Del Rio Road over
Empire Creek
This project will replace the existing barrier rails of the Rainbow Canyon Bridge over Pechanga Creek and the
Del Rio Road Bridge over Empire Creek. Contract documents have been returned and the Purchase Order was
issued. Kick offmeeting was held on January 15, 2002.
18. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site
A fire station will be built at the Wolf Creek Site. Initial construction drawings are to be submitted by the end
of Febmary 2002.
19. Community Theatre
This project will create a community theatre at the old Mercantile building in downtown Temecula.
Preliminary design of project is underway with design survey complete. City is expecting plans for first plan
check any day.
20. City Maintenance Facility Modifications (Parking Lot)
Under this project, a security fence will be installed between the existing maintenance facility and the western
side of City Hall to secure the parking lot west of the main building. A scoping meeting was held on 11/12/01.
Research on existing base maps for the proposed area and as-builts for the existing security fence near the
maintenance facility is underway.
21. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II
This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and Felix Valdez.
PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON-HOLD
1. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements
Project is on hoM. Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound
Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. Design is 50% complete. This
project may be done by a developer.
2. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15
This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road.
This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an
5 R:WlontldyActivityReporfiC IPL200 BDecember.dec
additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is revisiting the merits of this project in
light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may
have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Street Interchange. This project is suspended
indefinitely.
6 R:~VlonflflyAcfivityRepo~CIPX200BDecember.doc
Z
ILl
ILl
0
,.,I
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
December 4, 2001
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - November, 2001
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house
personnel for the month of November, 2001:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 61
B. Total signs installed 20
C. Total signs repaired
II.
TREES
A. Total trees tdmmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
Ill.
IV.
VI.
VII.
ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. 177 New and repainted legends
B. 216 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
3,514
28
333
31500
19
5,809
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 4~ service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree
trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 7._.~0
service order requests for the month of October, 2001.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 103 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events
and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of November~ 2001 was
$ 48,273.00 compared to $ 30~998.00 for the month of October~ 200t.
Account No. 5402 $ 30,893.00
Account No. 5401 $ 15,700.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ 1,680.00
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
JerryAlegda, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of November, 2001
DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE
CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Date: 11/14/01 SANTIAGO ROAD AND
CONSTRUCT 4 DESILTING PONDS FOR
JOHN WARNER ROAD RAIN STORMS
# 5401
TOTAL COST $ 9,200.00
SANDBAGGING OF CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY
Date: 11/02/01 CITYWIDE AND CITY OWNED PROPERTIES
TOTAL COST I $ 8.010.00
5402
Date: 11/29/01 SERVICE LEVEL "R' AREAS GRADING OF DIRT ROADS AFTER RAIN
STORM IN SERVICE LEVEL "R" AREA
# 999-5402 TOTAL COST $1,680.00
CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING
Date: 11/08/01 CITYWIDE CITYWIDE ASPHALT SAW CUTTING FOR
PW MAINTENANCE PATCH TRUCK
# 5402
TOTAL COST $ 4,990.00
REMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALK CURB &
Date: 11/28/01 DIAZ ROAD, BIG SAGE ROAD, GUTTER & ROOT PRUNE PER CITY
VISTA LADERA STANDARDS
# 5402
TOTAL COST I $11,365.00
1) REPAIR RIBBON GUARD RA1L;
Date: 11/28/01 RA1NBOW CANYON ROAD AND 2) R&R PEDESTRIAN GUARDRAILS
# 5402 WINCHESTER AT DIAZ TOTAL COST
6,528.00
CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT
WEED ABATE, DEBRIS AND TRASH
Date: 11/07/01 CITYWIDE CHANNELS PICK-UP AT INLETS AND OUTLETS
# 5401 TOTAL CHANNELS: 11
TOTAL COST $ 6,500.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT //5401 $ 15,700.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT //5402 $ 30,893.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT 8999-5402 $ 1,680.00
g g g g o
0
m
z
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
11/01/01 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS
11 rD2/01 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 15 CATCH BASINS
11/07/01 AREAS #3 &//4 CLEANED & CHECKED 30 CATCH BASINS
11/08/01 AREA #4 CLEANED&CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS
11/09/01 LA SERENA AT CAMINO CORTO CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS
11/13/01 AREA g4 CLEANED&CHECKED 10 CATCH BASINS
11/15/01 AREA #1 CLEANED & CHECKED 108 CATCH BASINS
11/16/01 AREA #1 CLI~ANED & CHECKED 3 CATCH BASINS
11/26/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 53 CATCH BASINS
11/27/01 AREA # 1 CLEANED & CHECKED 6 CATCH BASINS
11/27/01 CITYWIDE "RAI~' CLEANED & CHECKED 38 CATCH BASINS
11/28/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN"' CLEANED & CHECKED 49 CATCH BASINS
TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 333
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
SIGNS
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
11/05/01 PAUBA WESTBOUND EAST OF MARGARITA REPAIR 4 R-26
11/05/01 AVENIDA BICICLETA AT JOHNSON REPAIR I R-1
11/05/01 CAM1NOPIEDRAROJO~VAILRANCHPARKWAY REPLACE 1 R-I (FADED)
11/05/01 NASSAU COURT AND NIBLICK ROAD INSTALL 4 BLUE RPMs (MISSING)
11/05/01 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER REPLACE I R-7
11/05/01 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER REPLACE 1 TYPEK (MISSING)
11/06/01 LOMALINDA AT TEMECULA REPLACE 1 R-I (FADED)
11/06/01 LOMALINDA AT TEMECULA INSTALL SNS 2 (MISSING)
11/06/01 MARGARITA AT JEDEDIAH SMITH REPAIR SNS 2
11/06/01 AREA $$2 REPLACE 6 SIGNS (FADED)
11/06/01 AREAS #2 AND $$3 REMOVE C.I.P. SIGNS 3
1 R-7 (DAMAGED)
11/07/01 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER REPLACE 1 TYPEK (MISSING)
11/07/01 AVENIDA BARCA 50/ NORTH OF MARGARITA REPLACE I W-41 (FADED)
11/07/01 41597 AVENIDA DE LA REINA REPLACE I W-17 (FADED)
11/07/01 MARGARITA - AVENIDA BARCA TO MORAGA REPLACE 7 R-26 COMBO (FADED)
11/08/01 RANCHO CALIF. RD. AT BUSINESS PARK DRIVE REPLACE lW-41 (FADED)
11/08/01 YNEZ AT TOWN CENTER N REPLACE 1 K-MARKER (BENT)
11/08/01 YNEZ AT TOWN CENTER N REPLACE 5 R-26 (FADED)
11/08/01 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REPLACE I R-26 COMBO (FADED)
11/08/01 MARGARITA AT SAN FERMAN INSTALL 2 SNS (MISSING)
11/13/01 RIOTEMBCULAATAVENIDADEMISSIONES REPLACED W-3, R-t, 4 RED "N" MARKERS
11/13/01 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER REPLACED R-10, R-26
11/13/01 BUTTERF1ELD STAGE ROAD N/O 79SO. REPLACED R-55, W-41
11/14/01 CAMINOPIEDRAATROJO INSTALLED R-l, W-66, W-63
11/14/01 JEH~'ERSON INSTALLED R2 "40"
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
11/15/01 CAMINATA WAY AND DELUCA ~VAY INSTALLED R-1
11/15/01 CAlvHNO PIEDRA AT ROJO INSTALLED R- 1
11/15/01 REDHAWK AT VIA CORDOBA REPLACED R-l, W-17
11/15/01 LOMALINDA AT DEL CORONADO REPLACED 2 W-17, R-I
11/16/0! PALAROAD WEST OFMASTERS REPLACED 2 R96, 2 R-96A
11/16/01 PALA ROAD AT RAINBOW CANYON ROAD REPLACED R20
11/19/01 LOMA PORTO STREET INSTALLED W53
11/20/01 AREA #3 REPLACED 4 S.N.S.
11/21/01 FRONT STREET AT Isx STREET REPLACED R-2 "25"
11/27/01 DEL RIO AT LAS HACIENDAS REPLACED TYPE N MARKER
11/27/01 PALA AT RAINBOW CANYON ROAD INSTALLED R20 - B
11/28/01 DEL RIO AT VIA MONTEZUMA REPA1RED 4 SIGNS
11/28/01 DEL RIO AT CALLE CORTEZ REPLACED N MARKER
11/28/01 MARGARITA AT SANTIAGO REPLACED W-74, W-11
11/28/01 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD REPLACED 3 DELINEATORS
11/29/01 PALA ROAD AND RAINBOW CANYON ROAD INSTALLED 4 R-20-B
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACEI) 61
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLEI) 20
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 11
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
11/01/01 BUTTERFIELD STAGE BRIDGE S/O 79(S) REMOVED 4,325 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/05/01 PAUBA 500' PAST STATION 84 REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/05/01 MARGARITA S/B 200' NO/O STONEWOOD REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/05/01 MARGARITA N/B 40 N/O RAMSEY REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/05/01 MARGARITA AT SANTIAGO REMOVED 24 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/06/01 29140 STONEWOOD REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/07/01 29766 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 164 S.K OF GRAFFITI
11/07/01 WINCHESTER AT MARGARITA REMOVED 22 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/08/01 I-15 FWY. AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 180 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/13/01 MONTELEGRO AT LEENA WAY REMOVED 14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/13/01 HWY 79(S) AT JEDEDIAH SMITH REMOVED 270 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/14/01 WINCHESTER AT DIAZ REMOVED 104 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/15/01 42101 MORAGA REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/15/01 28903 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 32 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/19/01 NICHOLAS AT NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY REMOVED 288 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/19/01 C STREET AT SANTIAGO REMOVED 108 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/26/01 NICHOLAS AT NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY REMOVED 14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/27/01 27471 YNEZ ROAD REMOVED 150 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/28/01 MAIN STREET BRIDGE REMOVED 46 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 5,809
TOTAL LOCATIONS 19
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION
WORK COMPLETED
11/29/01 CALLE CORTEZ ABATED 3,500 S.F. R,O.W. WEEDS
TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED 3~500
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
11/0601 MARGARITA AT JEDEDIAH SMITH TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES
11/07/01 41597 AVENIDA DE LA REINA TRIMMED I R.O.W. TREES
11/08/01 YNEZ AT TOWN CENTER N TRIMMED 1 R.O,W. TREES
11/08/01 MARGARITA AT SAN' FE~ TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES
11/27/01 DEL RIO AT LAS HACIENDAS TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES
11/27~1 RIDER WAY TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES
TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED ~9
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
STENCILS / STRIPING
MONTH OF, 2002
DATE LOCATION
WORK COMPLETED
11/05/01 AREA fi4 REPAINT 19 LEGENDS
11/06/01 AREA #3 REPAINT 38 LEGENDS
11/07/01 AREA #3 REPAINT 22 LEGENDS
11/08/01 AREA g4 REPAINT 39 LEGENDS
11/14/01 AREA 84 REPAINT 11 LEGENDS
3 LEGENDS
11/15/01 VAIL RANCH REPAINT 200 LF. RED CURB
11/26/01 AREA g4 REPAINT 21 LEGENDS
11/27/01 NANTES COURT AT CORBIE STREET INSTALLED 16 L.F. OF RED CURB
11/28/01 AREA 84 REPAINTED 8 LEGENDS
TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 177
NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING LF. 216
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL
TONS
11/06/01 PALA ROAD AT MASTERS AC OVERLAY 1,002 4.5
11/07/01 VIlqCENT MORAGA AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD POTHOLES 10 TEMP AC
11/07/01 PALA ROAD NORTH OF MASTERS AC OVERLAY 879 4.5
11/08/01 PALA ROAD NORTH OF MASTERS AC OVERLAY 750 3.5
11/13/01 VINCENT MORAGA AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD R & R A.C. 176 6.5
11/14/01 VINCENT MORAGA AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD R & R A.C. 192 6.5
11/15/01 PALOMA PARK A.C. OVERLAY 353 2.5
11/26/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" POTHOLES 102 TEMP A.C.
11/28/01 AREA #1 PARADE ROUTE POTHOLES 50 TEMP A.C.
TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 3~514
TOTAL TONS 28
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK
RECEIVED COMPLETED
10/31/01 SAN FERMIN AT MARGARITA STREET NAME SIGN 11/02/01
11/01/01 4TM STREET FENCE 11/01/01
11/01101 DIAZ AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TREE 11/01/01
11/01/01 30138 CORTE CANTERA TREE TRIM 11/01/01
11/01/01 44715 CALLE BANUELOS TREE REMOVAL 11/01/01
11/01/01 SAN FERMIN & MARGARITA STREET NAME SIGN 11/02/01
11/02/01 31185 NASSAU COURT BLUE RPMs 11/05/01
11/05/01 DEL REY AT CALLE PINA COLa, DA ROAD REPAIR 11/05/01
11/05/01 N. GENERAL KEARNEY AND GEORGE TOWN GRADING 11/05/01
11/05101 CORTE SOLIDAD TREE TRIMlvffNG 11/05/01
11/05/01 30658 SOUTHERN CROSS TREE TRIMMING 11/05/01
11/05/01 41819 BOREALIS TREE TRIMMING 11/05/01
11105101 33264 CORTE YACA STUMP REMOVAL 11/05/01
11/06/01 PALA ROAD AC REPAIR 11/07/01
11/07/01 44715 GLEN EAGLES COURT STUMP REMOVAL 11/07/01
11/07/01 31411 DE PORTOLA STORM DRAIN 11/07/01
11/09/01 MARGARITA AT MORAGA DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/13/01
11/09/01 31480 CULBERTSON LANE DOOR OPENER / CATCH BASIN 11/09/01
11/12/01 DENDY PARKWAY HOSE ON FIRE HYDRANT 11/13/01
11/13/01 29717 WINDWOOD CIRCLE TREE TRIMMING 11/13/01
11/13/01 30165 CORTE CARRIZO DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/13/01
11/13/01 30535 AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE TREE DOWN 11/13/01
11/13/01 29682 STONEWOOD DRIVE TREE TRIMMING 11/14/01
11/13/01 43780 PAULITA ROAD SLURRY QUESTIONS 11/13/01
11/14/01 30141 CORTE CORAZO DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/14/01
DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK
RECEIVED COMPLETED
11/15/01 31171 MIRA LOMA TREE REMOVAL 11/15/01
11/15/01 43130 CORTE LANDEROS SIGN MISSING 11/15/01
11/16/01 CORTE LANDEROS SIGN MISSING 11/16/01
11/19/01 45411 MASTERS DRIVE A.C. WORK 11/19/01
11/20/01 FRONT STREET SIGN KNOCK DOWN 11/20/01
11/20/01 SARIC COURT S.N.S. COST 11/20/01
11/21/01 WINCHESTER ROAD DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/21/01
11/21/01 WINCI-IESTER ROAD AT JEF~'ERSON DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/21/01
11/26/01 JOHN WARNER DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/26/01
11/26/01 RAY SNODGRASS TREE TRIMMING 11/26/01
11/26/01 42030 MAIN STREET STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 11/26/01
11/27/01 39330 KIMBERLY GRADING OF STREET 11/27/01
11/27/01 42012 MAIN STREET CREEK MAINTENANCE 11/27/01
11/27/01 42100 MAIN STREET CREEK MAINTENANCE 11/27/01
11/27/01 43825 PAULITA ROAD ROAD GRADING 11/27/01
11/27/01 43825 PAULITA ROAD ROAD GRADING 11/27/01
11/2701 45064 CORTE ROSA SLURRY SEAL 11/27/01
11/27/01 30165 CORTE CARRIZO DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/27/01
11/27/01 29645 VIA MONDO DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/27/01
11/28/01 30011 VIA VELEZ TREE TRIMMING 11/28/01
11/29/01 31655 PIO PICO TREE TRIMMING I 1/29/01
TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 45
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: ~ Brad Buren, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: Januar~ 2, 2002
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - December, 200t
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house
personnel for the month of December, 2001:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 101
B. Total signs installed 85
C. Total signs repaired 11
I1.
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
28
III.
ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
2~039
5O
IV.
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
331
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
5,000
VI.
VI/.
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. 256 New and repainted legends
B. - 0 ~ L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
27
1~134
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 40 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree
trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 45
service order requests for the month of November, 2001.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 205
events and response to street emergencies.
hours of overtime which includes standby time, special
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of December, 2001 was
$103~470.94 compared to $ 48~273.00 for the month of November~ 2001.
Account No. 5402 $ 15,380.00
Account No. 5401 $ 9,210.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ -0-
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (ClPFFraffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December, 2001
DATE
ACCOUNT
STREET/CHANNEUBRIDGE
DESCRIPTION
OF WORK
TOTAL COST
SIZE
CONTRACTOR:
MONTELEONEEXCAVATING
Da~: 12/12/01
# 5402
Da~: 12/13/01
# 5401
CITYWIDE
CALLE MEDUSA CHANNEL
STORM DEBRIS REMOVAL AND REINFORCE
SANDBAGS
TOTAL COST
REMOVAL OF ALL SILT & DEBRIS FROM
CHANNEL
TOTAL COST
4,850.00
CONTRACTOR:
RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT
Date: 12/07/01
# 5402
CITY'S PROPERTIES
APPLICATION OF PRE & POST EMERGENT
HERBICIDES
TOTAL COST
$ 10,880.00
CONTRACTOR:
BECKER ENGINEERING
Date: 12/05/01
# 5401
YNEZ AT TOWN CENTER
(EMPIRE CREEK)
REINFORCE REP-RAP WITH SLURRY & REPAIR
EROSION AT HEAD WALL
TOTAL COST $ 4,360.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT g5401 $ 9,210.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT g5402 $15,380.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT /09-5402 ~ 0-
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK
RECEIVED COMPLETED
12/03/01 29645 VIA MONDO GLASS IN STREET 12/03/01
12/04/01 29610 VALI~ OLVERA TREE TRIMMING 12/04/01
12/04/01 30388 SENELA COURT STUMP REMOVAL 12/04/01
12/04/01 30449 BOGART PLACE TREE TRIMMING 12/04/01
12/04/01 PAUBA AT MARGARITA POTHOLES 12/04/01
12/05/01 41437 CHENIN BLANC TREE REMOVAL 12/05/01
12/05/01 41420 CHENIN BLANC TREE TRIMMING 12/05/01
12/06/01 YNEZ AT PAUBA SPILL 12/06/01
12/06/01 31062 CORTE ALAMAR SPILL 12/06/01
12/06/01 41588 CORTE SEDA TREE TRIMMING 12/06/01
12/06/01 33358 EASTRIDGE PLACE DRAINAGE CONCERN 12/06/01
1 2/07/01 YNEZ AT SOLANA DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/07/01
12/10/01 27523 SENNA TREE TRIMMING 12/10/01
12/10/01 42075 HUMBER DRIVE RAISED SIDEWALK 12/10/01
12/10/01 NO. GENERAL KEARNEY AT VIA LAS COLINAS DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/14/01
12/11/01 43244 RANCHO WAY DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/11/01
12/11/01 PAUBA AT MEADOWS TREE LIMB DOWN 12/11/01
12/11/01 32044 MERLOT CREST TREE TRIMMTNG 12/11/01
12/11/01 31072 CORTE AI~MAR OIL SPILL 12/11/01
12/11/01 MARGARITA AT HWY 79 SO. TREE REMOVAL 12/11/01
12/12/01 SANTIAGO WEST OF MARGARITA DAMAGED BARRIER 12/12/01
12/13/01 43129 VISTA DEL RANCHO TREE TRIMMING 12/13/01
12/13/01 VIA MONTEZUMA LOW FLOW GATES DAMAGED 12/13/01
12/17/01 30850 DE PORTOLA DEBRIS IN STREET' 12/17/01
DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK
RECEIVED COMPLETED
12/17/01 30603 DEL REY ROAD TREE TRIMMING 12/17/01
12/18/01 41325 BILLY JONE LANE DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/18/01
12/18/01 27270 NICHOLAS ROAD POTHOLES 12/18/01
12/19/01 30330 CHURCHII.I. COURT TREE TRHxdM1NG 12/19/01
12/19/01 41966 HUMBER DRIVE TREE TRIMMING 12/19/01
12/20/01 41282 VIA DEL MONTE REQUEST WOOD CH]PS 12/20/01
12/20/01 RANCHO VISTA DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/20/01
12/20/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MORAGA DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/20/01
12/21/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MARGARITA PAINT SPILL 12/21/01
12/21/01 41966 HUMBER DRIVE TREE REMOVAL 12/21/01
12/24/01 30851 DE PORTOLA ROAD TREE TR1MMING 12/24/01
12/24/01 27106 RAINI3OW CREEK DRIVE TREE TRIMMING 12/24/01
12/27/01 VILLA VENECIA AT MILANO DRBRIS PICK-UP 12/27/01
12/27/01 30165 CORTE CARR]ZO DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/27/01
12/28/01 HIAWATHA COURT SIDEWALK LIFTING 12/27/01
12/28/01 LOW FLOW CREEK WATER LEVEL 12/28/01
TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 40
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
STENCILS / STRIPING
MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
12/04/01 AREA fi4 REPAINTED 19 LEGENDS
12/05/01 AREA g4 REPAINTED 25 LEGENDS
12/06/01 YNEZ COURT AT YNEZ ROAD INSTALLED 8 LEGENDS
12/07/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF MEADOWS REPAINTED 6 LEGENDS
12/11/01 AREA gl REPAINTED 35 LEGENDS
12/13/01 AREA #1 REPAINTED 28 LEGENDS
12/19/01 AREA #1 REPAINTED 50 LEGENDS
12/19/01 AREA #1 REPAHxl I'ED 29 LEGENDS
12/26/01 AREAS #1 AND #2 REPAINTED 56 LEGENDS
TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 256
NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING LF. -0-
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE
MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
12/03/01 AREAS/41 AND #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 6 CATCH BASINS
12/04/01 AREAS gl AND #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS
12/05/01 AREAS #1 AND #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 38 CATCH BASINS
12/10/01 AREAS#1 ANDg2 CLEANED&CHECKED 50 CATCH BASINS
12/11/01 AREAS gl AND g2 CLEANED & CHECKED 23 CATCH BASINS
12/12/01 AREA #2 CLEANED&CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS
12/13/01 AREA gl CLEANED & CHECKED 46 CATCH BASINS
12/17/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 28 CATCH BASINS
12/18/01 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 40 CATCH BASINS
12/21/01 AREA 94 CLEANED & CHECKED 35 CATCH BASINS
12/31/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN' CLEANED&CHECKED 34 CATCH BASINS
TOTAL CATCH BASllN'S CLEANED & CHECKED 331
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS
MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL
TONS
12/04/01 CARMELITA CIRCLE A.C. OVERLAY 305 3
12~)5/01 CARMELITA CIRCLE A.C. OVERLAY 493 3.5
12/06/01 WALCOTT LANE AT CALLE CHAPOS CONSTRUCTED OSD 144 6
12/10/01 MEADOWS SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD A.C. OVERLAY 210 3
12/11/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD W/O VINCENT MORAGA R&R A.C. 171 6
12/17/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD W/O VINCENT MORAGA R&R A.C. 117 6.5
12/18/01 MARGARITA AT MORAGA R&R A.C. 215 6.5
12/19/01 CABRILLO AT JOHN WARNER R&R A.C. 240 9
12/20/01 CABRILLO AT JOHN WARNER R&R A.C. 144 6.5
TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 2,039
TOTAL TONS 50
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING
MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
12/03~)1 NO. GENERAL KEARNEY AT NICHOLAS TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES
12/10/01 PAUBA, YNEZ AND RANCHO VISTA TRlMMED 23 R.O.W. TREES
12/18/01 PAUBA AT MEADOWS TRIMMED 3 R.O.W. TREES
12/24H1 MEADOWS AT RANCHO VISTA TRIMME33 1 R.O.W. TREES
TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMM3ED 28
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SIGNS
MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
12/03/01 VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT NIGHTHAWK REPLACED 2 R-7, KMARKERS
12/03/01 BUTTER.FIELD STAGE ROAD AT WOLF STORE INSTALLED R-1
12/03/01 CAM1NO PIEDRA AT ROJO INSTALLED R2 25
12/03/01 VAILRANCH REPLACED W-56, 3 R-7,4 KMARKERS
12/04/01 YNEZ ROAD SOUTH OF SOI~NA REPLACED 2 R-10, 2 TYPE K
12/04/01 VIARENATE AT VIALA VIDA AREA INSTALLED 10 S.N.S.
12/04/01 CALLE BAHIA VISTA REPLACED R-1
12/04/01 CAMINO MAREA REPLACED R-1
12/04/01 REGINA DRIVE REPLACED R-1
12/04/01 REGINA DRIVE AND CAMINO RUBANO INSTALLED 2 R-2 25
12/1)5/01 79 SO. AT FRONT STREET REPLACED R-26
12/05/01 WINCHESTER AT DIAZ INSTALLED 19 HASH MARKS
12/05/01 FIRE STATION 84 REPLACED 3 R-26
12/05/01 TIERRA VISTA INSTALLED 2 TYPE N MARKERS
12/06/01 MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA INSTALLED R73 - 2
12/06/01 TEMEKU AT TEE DRIVE INSTALLED R-2 25
12/06/01 30010 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REPLACED R-26
12/06/01 NICHOLAS AT NO. GENERAL ~Y REPLACED R- 1
12/06/01 SUNNY MEADOWS AT CORBIE INSTALLED 2 W~o6
12/07/01 N. GENERAL KEARNEY ~ SANTA GERTRUDIS CR. REPLACED 2 R-1
12/07/01 WALCOTTAT CAI.I,~ CHAPOS INSTALLED 2 W57, 2 TYPE K, 2 S.N.S~
12/10/01 WALCOTT AT CALLE CHAPOS INSTALLED W57, W3, W3 lA, TYPE K
12/10/01 TEIVIEKU AT PIN WAY REPLACED R-7
12/10/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD FJO MARGARITA REPLACED 13 R-26~81 COMBOS
12/10/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD W/O VINTAGE H]I,L REPLACED 6 R-26-81 COMBOS
12/10/01 RAMCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MEADOWS REPLACED R2 - 55
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
12/11/01 yNrEZ AT RANCHO VISTA REPLACED R2 - 45
12/~01 RANCHO CALIF. RD. AT MARGARITA & YUKON INSTALLED 6 R-26-81 COMBOS
12/12/01 MARGARITA AT PAUBA REPLACED W-41
12/12/01 40156 CALLE MEDUSA REPLACED W-41
12/12/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD N/O YNEZ REPLACED R-26-81 COMBOS 21
12/13/01 FELl)( VALDEZ AT VINCENT MORAGA REPLACED R-1
12/13/01 SANTIAGO AT PUJOL REPLACED R-1
12/13/01 NICHOLAS AT WINCHESTER INSTALLED 4 R-26-81 COMBOS
12/13/01 NICHOLAS AT WINCHESTER REPLACED W-41, R-7
12/14/01 TEMEKU HILLS INSTALLED 4 N.H.W.S.
12/17/01 VIA RIO TEMECULA AT COUNTRY GLEN REPLACED R-2 "25"
12/18/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. AT VIA LAS COLINAS I]q'STALL W53
12/18/01 YNEZ AT SOLANA INSTALL 4 R26-81 COMBOS
12/18/01 SINGLE OAK AT BUSINESS PARK DRIVE REPLACED W-17
12/18/01 42036 MORAGA REPLACED W41
12/18/01 DE PORTOLA AT CAMPANULA REPLACED R-7
12/18/01 LA SERENA AT SO. GENERAL KEARNEY REPLACED W-17
12/18/01 AVENIDA BARCA AT MARGARITA REPLACED 4 R-26
12/19/01 AVENIDA BARCA AT MARGARITA REPLACED 5 R-26
12/19/01 MEADOWS AT I-1WY 79 SO. REPLACED R-7
12/19/01 YNEZ AT SANTIAGO N& S REPLACED 2 W-41
12/20/01 LOMALINDA INSTALLED 4 R2 "25"
12/20/01 JEDEDIAH SMITHAT HWY. 79 SO. INSTAI.I.~D R-2 35
12/20/01 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT YNEZ INSTALLED R-2 35
12/24/01 MEADOWS AT PAUBA REPLACED W- 17
12/26/01 MARGARITA N/O RUSTIC GLEN REPLACED 8 DELINEATORS
12/27/01 VALLEJO AVENUE E & W INSTAll.RD 8 R-2 "35"
12/27/01 27606 STANFORD INSTALLED W-53
12/28/01 STANFORD DRIVE AT CHANTEMAR ROAD INSTALLED W-53
12/28/01 BALATA DRIVE & MASI-I]E WAY INSTALLED W-53
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 101
TOTAL SIGNS INSTAI,I ,El) 85
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 11
CITY OF.TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2001
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
12~)7/01 NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REMOVED 23 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/10/01 1-15 AT TEMECULA CREEK REMOVED 399 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/11/01 SOLANA AT MARGARITA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/13/01 39960 NO. GENERAL KEARNY REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/13/01 27480 COLT REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/17/01 EMPIRE CREEK AT YNEZ ROAD (5 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 99 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/17,'D1 TOWN CENTER NORTH AT YNEZ REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/17/01 42192 LYNDIE LANE REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/18/01 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/18/01 RANCHO CALIF. ROAD AT CALLE TAJO (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 134 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/19/01 29601 MIRA LOMA REMOVED 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/21/01 MORAGA ROAD AT CHANNEL REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/21/01 42101 MORAGA REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/24/01 HUMBER AT LONG VALLEY (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 143 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/26/01 RANCHO VISTA AT SANTA SUSANA (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 29 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/26/01 30302 LONG VALLEY REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
12/26KH 1sT STREET BRIDGE REMOVED 180 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 1,134
TOTAL LOCATIONS 27
0 0 0 0 0 0