The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About100901 CC AgendaIIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if yo ~ need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6 ¢44. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE OCTOBER 9, 2001 At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may conbnue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. may be acquired by revieWing the Pub CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Joanne Algier Bishop Brad Snell of Church Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2001-15 Resolution: No. 2001-88 f Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints The Flag Salute will be led by ~l'roop No. 911 Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone,~Comerchero R:~Agenda\100901 1 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Excellence in Transportation Award for Overland Drive Ovei'crossin,q Introduction of County Supervisor Jim Venable (Third Distric~t) Certificate of Achievement to Jessica Garnett of the Case B~atbusters Presentation of City/County Marketinq First Place Award fo~ the City of Temecula Tourism Brochure Boys and Girls Club Presentation Fire Prevention Week Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of th, public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If youI desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out a~nd filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward For all Public Hearing or Council Business matt( Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual spe CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matt at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes CONSENT CALENDAR and state your name for the record. rs on the agenda, a "Request to to the Council addressing that item. akers. .~rs not on the agenda will be made will be devoted to these reports. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are co~nsidered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote, There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific ite~ms be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. ~ Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedlre RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances agenda. R:~Agenda\100901 and resolutions included in the 3 R:~Agenda\100901 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of July 24, 2001; 2.2 Approve the minutes of August 14, 2001 (RCIP Resolution approvin,q List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Workshop). Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI,L OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as First Amendment to Professional Contract for Buildin, RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve a First Amendment to the Professional )f August 31, 2001. Inspection Staff Services Agreement with P & D Consultants amending Exhibit B (Hourly Compensation Rate Schedule). Approval of the Urban Recreat'ona and Cultural Centers, Museums, and Facilities for W d fe Education or Environmental Education Program Grant Application for thc, Imagination Workshop -The Temecula Children's Mdseum RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0t- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR URBAN RECREATIONAL! AND CULTURAL CENTERS, MUSEUMS, AND FACILITIES FOR WILDLIFE EDUCATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 3 7 Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Award a contract for Pentium based computer v 'orkstations to Tech 101 - Arcus, Inc. of Irvine, California, in the amount of $44,618.25; 7.2 Appropriate $5,500 from Development Impact Fees- Corporate Facilities. 8 9 10 Purchase of City Vehicle RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the purchase of one 2001 Ford Range~ four door, from Rancho Ford Lincoln Mercury for $26,873.01. Approval of Development Impact Fee ReimbursementlAgreement with Temeka Advertisinq (42380 Zevo Drive) t A t RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Development Impact Fee Reimbursemen greemen between the City of Temecula and Temeka Advertising providing forlthe reimbursement of $10,400 of Development Impact Fees. Professional Services Aqreement - Berryman & Heniqar - Pavement Manaqement Update - FY2001-2006 - Proiect No. PW 01-22 (RFP INc. RECOMMENDATION: 11 10.1 Approve an agreement with Berryman & Heniga~.in an amount not to exceed $48,578.00 to provide the necessary design services needed to prepare the update of the Pavement Management Program - FY 2001-2006 - Project No. PW 01-22 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 10 2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change o~rders~ot to exceed the ' contingency amount of $4,857.80 which is equal to 10 Yo of the agreement amount. Parcel Map No. 29864 (located on the southwest corner of State Route South and Buttedield Staqe Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29864 in conformance 11.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement security for the agreement. 4 R:\Agenda\100901 ~/ith the conditions of approval; ~nd accept the Monument Bond as 12 13 14 Authorize Temporary Partial Street Closures'for Race for the Cure Event on October 21, 2001, in the Promenade Mall area (Margarita Road, Jblana Way, Ynez Road1 and Overland Drive) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL~ OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES FOR INLAND EMPIRE RACE FOR THE CURE EVENT ON OCTOBER 21, 2001, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THISl SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT Award of Construct on Contract for the S te Grad nq &Pav nq of the Va Ranch nter m Fire Station - Proiect No. PW01-21 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Award a contract for the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station - Site Grading & Paving - Project No. PW01-21 to McLaugh n Eng neer ng& M n ng for a base amount of $82,000.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract; h I , tt 13.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve c ange oroers no o exceed the contingency amount of $8,200.00 which is equa to 10% of the contract amount. Second Readinq of Ordinance No. 01-14 (Amendinq the Temecula Municipal Code) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01 -14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIl TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAK[ TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING NO. 01-0129 OF THE CITY OF AND 17 OF THE MINOR CHANGES APPLICATION R:~Agenda\100901 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELi )PMENT AGENCY 5 CALL TO ORDER: Pres[dent Jeff Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2001-15 Comerchero, N~aggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENTS / A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the a~,enda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If ou decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the C ~nsent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the ity Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forwar and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item.I There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a competed pnk "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for :he record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Community Services Recreation Brochure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Award contract to Graphics Unlimited Lithog~ 1.2 aphy for the preparation and printing of four issues of the Community Services Re ;reation Brochure over a two-year period with a third-year option to renew. The annual is $39,141; cost of printing the brochure Approve a contingency of 10% or $3,914 annually. R:~Agenda\100901 6 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, October 23, 2001, 7:00 Prvl Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\100901 , City Council Chambers, 43200 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comer( PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so member Redevelopment Agency on items that are not liste Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2001-06 ero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts of the public may address the on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. if you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. I There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 25, 200' EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, October 23, 2001, City Cour Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\100901 8 :il Chambers, 43200 Business Park RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 Inland Empire Airports First 16 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Provide direction to staff on taking a formal posi of March Airport and other Inland Empire Airports. / Appointment of Members to the General Plan CommJnity (continued from the September 25, 2001, City Council RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Appoint the remaining members of the General Committee. 17 Disaster Relief for the American Red Cross (requested by Councilman Stone) RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Provide direction to staff regarding a $25,000 dc to assist with the disaster relief effort for the victims CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY A'I-I'ORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, October 23, 21 Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive ',ion of support for the development Advisory Committee meeting) Plan Community Advisory nation to the American Red Cross of September 11, 2001. 101, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\100901 9 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER JULY 24, 2001 The City of Temecula City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, July 24, 2002 in the Main Conference Roor~ of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Cal~forma. The Open Session of the City Counci~ meeting commenced at 7:02 P.M. m the C~ty Council Chambers. ROLL CALL a Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pr tt, Roberts, Stone, and Mayor Comerchero. Absent: Councilmember: None. PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Ms. Jennifer Taft. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Sophia Sadler of Ha ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Mayor Come PUBLIC COMMENTS 'vestor Church of Temecula. 'chero. Ms. Maggie Allen, 42960 Calle Reva, apprised the City Council and the audience of a new television show, Temecula Students of the Month, which Ican be seen on Channel 28, beginning August 14, 2001 at 6:00 P.M. preceding the City Council meeting. In res onse to Counc I "t ' ,, p i man ~ one s commenting .nat other restaurants have expressed an interest n part c pating with respect to the filming location, Ms. Allen relayed that the Chamber of Commerce could explore the feasibility of utilizing a variety of restaurants for the filming. Ms. Michelle Anderson, 43791 Barletta Street, representing Citizens First of Temecula Valley, expressed thanks to Mr. David Lowry, Mr. Steve Vliss, and Mr. Richard Ashby for their generous contributions towards the building of a pedestrian bridge at the intersection of Winchester/Nicolas Roads; relayed thanks to Councilman Pratt for the concept of the bridge being installed at this location four years ago; noted thanks to Councilman Naggar for his efforts regarding funding; and expressed thanks to all the City Councilmembers for their approval of this necessary bridge. 1 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS For informational purposes, Councilman Pratt rel ed that he would be presenting a PowerPoint Presentation at the Public/Traffic Saf~;~', Commission meeting on Thursday, July 26th, noting that the topic would b, Public Transportation; and invited all to attend. In response to Ms. Anderson's comments expressed during the public comment period, Councilman Stone relayed thanks for her ~ccolades, noting that a pedestrian bridge was an important amenity in a City; for informational purposes, clarified that the School District was a separate entity (from th~ City), determining the site location for the school; and advised that the recent accident could have happened at any ~ntersect~on n the C ty, re ay ng that the driver ~nvolved was suffering from a medical cond~bon which caused the driver to be d~sonented. Advising that he had arranged a meeting in April to gain support for the development of a natural gas fueling station in Temecula, May~r Pro Tern Roberts relayed the recent approval of a federal grant for $250,000 which constituted twenty-nine percent (29%) of the funding needed, and the potential toIreceive another grant (from the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee) for $200,000; and relayed hopes for the City to have a natural gas fuehng stabon in Temecula at the Down Commercial Fueling Inc., in November of 2002. Referencing an article in the Press Enterprise regarding how cities have addressed growth in terms of Public Safety, and the Police Officer/resident ratio in each city, Mayor Comerchero clanfled that the article ~ncluded incorrect facts, stating that the C~ty of Temecula has 43 sworn Pohce Officer, wh .ereas the C~ty of Temecula actually has 68 sworn Police Officers serving approximately 60,000 residents; and noted that although the population has almost doubled, cnm~ ~n the C~ty of Temecula has decreased fifty-and-a-half percent (50.5%) since 1993. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Proc dure RECOMMENDATION: t xt f II ' 1.1 Motion towaive the reading of the e o a ordinances in the agenda. and resolutions included 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of June 26, 2001. 3 Resolution approvinq List of Demands 4 5 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31,2001 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements fo the nine months ended March 31,2001. Purchase of City Vehicle RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the purchase of the Dodge Durango model year 2001 from Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge ~n the amount of $29,576.63. 7 8 Arts Council of Temecula Valley Concerts on the reen and Arts in the Country Festival Grant A.qreement RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve a Special Event Community Grant greement between the City of Temecula and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley in the amount of FY20 onomic Development Operatinq Aqr ements RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the operating/marketing agreement with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Corporation of Southwest R vers de County, Temecula Valley Fdm Councd, Inland Empire Economic Partnership, and Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance; tI 7.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the opera lng/marketing agreements for each of the organizations. Award of Construction Contract for Starliqht Ridqe Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Prelect - Prelect No. PW00-22 RECOMMENDATION: 3 9 8.2 Award a construction contract for the Starlig it Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project - Project No. PW00-22 - t(~ Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. in the amount of $51,790.00 and authorize the Ma' for to execute the contract; 8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,179.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Councilman Naggar advised that he would be bstaining from this item. / Maintenance Aqreement - Habitat West, Inc.- Lo~.q. Canyon Detention Basin - Project No. PW01-05 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve a five-year Maintenance Agreement with Habitat West, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $26,140.00 and ~uthorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 10 11 12 Temecula Valley - La Serena Way Storm Drain - Staqe 2 - Project No. 7-0-0315 - Tract Map No. 23371-11 - Cooperative Aqreem~nt RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the Margarita Road - Temecula Valley - La Serena Way Storm Drain - Stage 2 - Project No. 7-0-0315 - Tract Map No. 23371-11 - Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside C6unty Flood Control and Water Conservat on D str ct, the C ty of Temecula, and M.A. Temeku H~ s Development, LLC; 10.2 Authorize the execution of such agreement i~ its final form by the Mayor, City Attorney, and City Clerk. Tract Map No. 23143-5 - now in conformance with lits oriqinal approval (located south of Pauba Road, east of Butterfield Staqe Road, and north of De Portola Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23143-5; 11.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument cash deposit as security for the agreements. State Transportation Improvement Proqram (ST P) D scretionary Fund Application - Cherry Street Southbound Off-ramp Improvemeni Project RECOMMENDATION: 4 13 14 15 12.1 Receive and file the report regarding the 20q2 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Discretionary Fund application for the Cherry Street Southbound Off-ramp Improvement Prelect and authonze the D rector of Publ c Works to forward sa d appl~cabon to the R~vers~de County Transportation Commission; 12.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALTRANS APPLICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR 2002 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR THE CHERRY STREET SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT B I I Professional Services Aqreement for io oqica Observations and Monitorinq Lonq Canyon Detention Basin -Proiect No. PW01~05 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve a five-year Professional Services Agreement with EDAW, Inc. for a totalagreement· not to exceed $58,539.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Professional Services Aqreement for desiqn services for Wolf Creek Fire Station Site -Proiect No· PW01-11 / RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve an acceleration of $100,000 from th Capital Improvement Budget for FY2002-2003 to the current FY2001-200~ budget for the Wolf Creek Fire Station Site - Project No. PW01-11; 14.2 Approve a Professional Services Agreement with STK Architecture, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $159,500.00 to ~' ' prowde design services for the Wolf Creek Fire Station Site - Project No. PWol-11 - within the planned Wolf Creek Development and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 14.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve amen :tments/change orders not to exceed the cent ngency amount of $15,950.00 which ~s equa to 10% of the agreement. 14, 2001 City Council meeting. This item was continued to the August FY2000-2001 Slurry Seal Program - Prelect No. PW01-07 - Add Diaz Road 16 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Authorize the City Manager to approve cont~ ~ct change orders with American Asphalt for an amount of $45,000 above the previously approved 10% contingency for the FY2000-2001 Slurr Seal Program - Project No. PW01-07. Completion and Acceptance of Construction Contr ~ct for Old Town Southside Parkinq Lot - Proiect No. PW98-16 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Accept the Old Town Southside Park Lot Pr( ect- Project No. PW98-16 - as complete; 16.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Peri ~rmance Bond, and accept a 12-month Maintenance Bond ~n the amount of 10% of the contract; 16.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been fil~ed. 17 Third Amendment to Law Enforcement Services A. 18 Riverside RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve the third amendment to the Law En' between the County of Riverside and the Cit hiring of one lieutenant, one traffic/motorcycl service officer. Roripauqh Specific Plan - Status Report RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Receive and file. 19 Walker Basin Specific Plan No. 172 substantial cot 20 reement with County of orcement Services Agreement of Temecula to include the officer, and one community :ormance No. 1 and Tentative Tract Map No. 29369 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Authorize the City Manager to prepare a letter in support of the 106-dwelling unit proposal developed by the Riverside County,, Planning Department staff for the Walker Basin Specific Plan. Woodside Homes Traffic Siqnal Reimbursement RECOMMENDATION: 6 20.1 Approve the refund of the Traffic Signal Dev .~lopment Impact Fees in the amount of $45,000.00 to Woods~de Homes qf Cahforn~a for 50 ~ of the cost of Traffic Signal Improvements at Margarita Road and Verde Lane. t MOTION: Councilman Stone moved o approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-13, and 15-20, and moved to continue Item No. 14 to the August 14, 2001 City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts at~d voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Councilman Naggar who abstained with respect to Item No. 8. / For informational purposes, Deputy City Manager Thornhill provided an oral report regarding the Roripaugh Project Process, noting that on Friday, ~ ' sta?, two Councdmembers, and Commissioner Telesio met with the applicant's representative for a meeting which lasted approximately 3.5 hours, advising that the primary issue~ of discussion were the land use issues, and buffering; relayed that the Subcommittee m~de recommendations to increase the buffering, to reduce densities in areas of the plan, prowded direction regarding the trails, and drainage issues, discussed road improvements on Nicolas Road, determined to schedule a meeting to discuss the design parameters as,soc~ated with Nicolas Road at build- out, and directed the applicant to have the Design Guidelines completed (which the applicant's representative had agreed to); noted that thelminutes of the Friday meeting were provided the applicant on Monday; and advised that staff has had no response from the applicant, including a lack of response regarding the Subcommittee s d~rect~on to provide a Specific Plan. For Councilman Pratt, Deputy City Manager Thornhill, e hoed by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts, relayed that neighboring residents in Nicolas Valley expressed concern regarding the lack of buffering between their homes and the project, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts noting the Subcommittee s d~rect~on to relocate vanous larger buffer areas on the east end of the project to the south end, relaying hopes that the applican~ will soon respond to the Subcommittee's direction. In response to Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill specified that staff made e cry attempt to contact the apphcant, noting d~scouragement that there had been no response. Reiterating the City Council's commitment to agree to fast-track the comprehensive evaluation of this project, Councilman Stone noted disap~)ointment at the lack of cooperation from the applicant which was necessary for the project's time schedule; suggested that a letter from the Mayor be sent to the applicant, clarifying t quality project to the City with very important infrastructu~ cooperation from the applicant, the City would need to sE if deadlines are not met, the City Council will be required efforts will continue to expedite the project process. In re ~e City Council's desire to bring a e, noting that if there was not full ek alternate options, advising that to re-evaluate whether, or not, ;ponse, Mayor Comerchero noted his concurrence, relaying that as soon as time permitted :hey could meet together to draft a letter, th T I At 7:29 P. M., the City Council convened as e emecu a Community Services District, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and The Industrial Development Authority. At 7:33 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business. PUBLIC HEARING 21 Harveston Specific Plan This item was heard out of order, after consideratior see page 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 22 Compensation for Commission Members (as requested by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts) RECOMMENDATION: 2211 Consider amending Section 2.40.100 of th( provide compensation to Commission Met and provide direction to staff. of Agenda Item Nos. 22, and 23; City's Municipal Code to ~bers on a per-meeting basis Advising that this item was agendized per Mayor Pro Te~ n Roberts's request, Assistant Manager O'Grady summarized the staff report (of record t, noting the recommendation that the Commissioners be compensated on a per meeting b~sis rather than a flat monthly basis which would more accurately reflect the actual vanable schedule of vanous Commissions. Noting the recent numerous meetings of the Planning Commission which additionally entails a plethora of review prior to the meetings, Mayor Pro Ter~ Roberts clarified the rationale for agendizing this item. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to direct City ,~ttorney Thorson to prepare an ordinance reflecting an amendment to Section 2.40.100 of the City's Municipal Code to provide compensation to Commission Members on a perI meeting bas~s. Councdman Naggar seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 23 Appointment of an Animal Shelter Subcommittee (as requested by Councilman Naggar) RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Appoint a subcommittee to review the Anima Friends of the Valley proposed new shelter. Assistant to the City Manager Yates provided an overview of the staff report (via material). Noting that he fully supports the development of a new A Wildomar, Councilman Naggar volunteered to serve on t, agenda ~imal Shelter facility in the City of subcommittee. MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to appoint himself serve on this particular subcommittee. The motion was seconded by Councilman voice vote reflected unanimous approval. ~nd Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to Stone and At 7:39 P.M. the meeting recessed, reconvening at 7:53 P.M. 8 At this time the City Council considered Agenda Iter PUBLIC HEARING 21 Harveston Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01 - No. 21. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING I THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN !AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF I OVERRIDING CONS DERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION, MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM INI CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE !5, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMITS (PLANNING APPLICATION 00-0189) 21.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC!L OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0419 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE TWO EXCLUDED PARCELS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO.113 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418) ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF TiHE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910-261-002 015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021 076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008 005, 910-120-007, 910-120-008 002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001 002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004 910-110-013, 910-110- 910-1110-027, 910-110- 910-060-009, 910-120- 911-6:30-001, 911-630- 911-640-002, 911-180- 911-180-008, 911-180- 009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023, AN D 911-180-028 21.3 Read by title only and introduce an ordinanc .= entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE IDEVELOPMENT CODE TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.070 TO INCLUDE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 AND ADOPTING A PORTION OF CHAPTER 11 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) ZONING STANDARDS CONTAINED RESIDENTIAL ANDI COMMERCIAL THEREIN FOR DEVELOPMENT FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13, ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED ON THE APPROXIMATELY EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 9 10-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021, 910-110-027, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, AND 911-180-02 (PLANNING APPLICA~ 21.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 01- 910-110-076, 910-120-008, 911-640-001, 911-180-004, 911-180-023 'ION 99-0418) entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE FOR THE AREA OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCElr NOS. 910-261- 001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015 910-110- 020, 910-110-021, 910-110-027, 910-110-076 910-100- 007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-003 910-120- 007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002 911-630- 003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002 911-180- 003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009 911-180- 015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028. (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0245) 21.5 introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: 10 ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUN(:IL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED ' DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND LENNAR COMMUNITIES (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0446)" 21.6 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN(: IL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNINI APPLICATION NO. 00-0295 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAF NO. 29639, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES INTO 91 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN SPACE AREAS, SCHOOL AND PARK SITES OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR NOS. 910-261-001, 910.261-002, 910.110.013 015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021, 910-110-027, 076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630-003, 001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 023 AND 911-180-028 PARCEL 910-110- 910-110- 910-120- 911-640- 911-180- 911-180- 21.7 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC!L OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0030 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAPI NO. 29928, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES INTO 140 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 21 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN PLANNING AREA 7 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEl(, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-640-001 AND 911-630-003 21.8 Adopt a resolution entitled: I1 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNIN~ APPLICATION NO. 01-0031 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAE NO. 29929, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES INTO 118 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN !SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREAS 31AND 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROADIAND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEl. NOS. 910-261- 001, 910-261-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180- 004 AND 911-180-015 21.9 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC!L OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0032 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAPI NO. 30088, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.18 ACRES INTO 38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 8 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SAN'rA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-630- 001,911-630-002 AND 911-180-015 The Staff Report is Presented Senior Planner Hogan presented the project plan (via the staff report), highlighting the location, the associated documents, the proposed 1921 Units, the Service Commercial area, and the various project components (i.e., the elementary school, the lake, end the Lake Park, the Community Park, the Arroyo Park, and th~ Village Center Area); noted that this particular project was considered by the Plannin~ Commission at the June 20th, and July 12th meetings, relaying the Planning Commissioh's concerns relayed at the initial hearing which consisted of the following: the proposed densities in two areas, the zoning of the outlots, the issue of the public accessing the lake, the design criteria along the I-15, the traffic methodology, as well as the school funding; clanhed that these concerns were addressed at the July 12th Planning Comrhission meeting, and the Planning Commission approved the proposed plan unanimously, subject to the modifications denoted in Attachment No. 13 (per agendalmaterial); relayed a summary of the public comments, noting that all of the residents residing proximate to the project spoke in favor of the project; and advised that the Councilmembers had been provided copies of the minutes of those two Planning Commission meetings, as well as the final copy of the Development Agreement, additionally noting staff's recent receipt of three 12 letters concerning the project, one from Ms. Pamela Mio one from Channel Commercial, and one from Ms. Joan Sparkman (which h~ad been distributed to the City Council via supplemental agenda material). For informational purposes, Councilman Stone provided dynamics of this property, relaying that there was a time exceeded the value of the property, advising that Lennal an overview of the economic when the debt on the property Communities came along with a vision for a plan based on the General Plan, and inves :ed $5 million into Assessment District (AD) No. 161. / In response to Councilman Stone, Director of Public Wolks Hughes specified the infrastructure improvements funded by AD 161; and confirmed that Lennar Communities refinancing was approximately $10 million, f' For Councilman Naggar, with respect to the re ~nanced taxes associated with the property, Director of Finance Roberts relayed that those ~axes were not discounted, but that various penalties and interest fees were waived by the County due to the taxes being delinquent. The Applicant Provided a Proiect Overview Mr. Bill Storm, representing the applicant, noted the three-year prOject planning process, commending staff for their assiduous efforts regarding th~9 project; provided a brief h'story of h's 'nvolvement 'n other projects ~nclud~ng vanous award w~nning projects; relayed the early goal to create a project whereby the City of Temecula would be more benefited with the project, than without it; and provided additional information regarding the high development standards which would be set with the Harveston Project. Mr. Ray Becker, representing the applicant, provided a highlighting the following: Relayed statistical data related to the existing reside noting that approximately fourteen percent (14%) of owerPoint Presentation ,ts in the City of Temecula, ~e population are singles, living alone, that eleven percent (11%) are singles, living with roommates, nine percent (9%) are singles, living with children, twenty-six percent (26%) are couples with no children, and forty percent (40%) of the population is ~nade-up of families, clarifying the need for a diverse range of housing products. / Presented an illustrative plan, relaying the higher den,sity product proposed around the lake, and the lower density product proposed on the outside of the Iccp road. Noted the Four Cornerstone Elements of Harveston, listed as follows: Hometown Character accomplished with landscaped parkways, 10 architectural ~o~ign concepts, neighborhoodlmini-parks, a diverse range of densities, open-ended cul-de-sacs with arbors, distinctive signage, lighting, and mailboxes, the Village Center which encourages I~edestrian activity, and attractive streetscapes; and for Councilman Naggar, further specified the various lot sizes represented in the housing product illustrations. Parklands and Open Space, noting that the proposed parks and Open Space was approx mately tw'ce the amount denoted ~n tl~e ex~sting Genera P an, highlighting the lake feature, the amphitheater, the Community Park with all the improvements (including lighted fields) to be con~ ;tructed Prior to Issuance of any Building Permits in the second phase, the Paseo 'Park, the central loop street with enhanced landscaping, and the riparian OpE n Space area. Manaqed Growth and Circulation Improvements, noting the significant existing road improvements (at a cost of approximately 14.4 million dollars) the school site provisions the flood control improvements, the proposed ~mprovements associated with the project, many of which will beI completed Prior to the Issuance of the first Building Permit, the aid in the facilitation of the New Interchange Project, the proposed off-site intersection improvements (at a cost of approximately $7 million), clarifying that Harveston would construct improvements three times the traffic capacity that, it needed which would total approximately $37 million, Prior to Occupancy. Connectivity, noting the 112 acres of Serv ce Commercial which would generate sales tax and local employment, and the transit p an inclusive of a shuttle system. Concluded the project summary, reiterating the projebt's consistency w th the General Plan, the consistency w~th the Growth Management Plan (inclusive of a priority for provisions for public facilities first, roads first, schools first, and a variety of architectural styles and a diverse housing project witl~ a wide range of recreational activities, and provisions for employment opportunitiEs via the Service Commercial area); and requested the City Council to approve the Harveston Community Project Plan. The Applicant addressed the City Council's questions / Addressing Councilman Naggar's queries, Mr. Becker provided the following / Relayed that with the exception of the townhome area, there were no 2,000 square foot homesites anticipated, although the option waslavailable, clarifying that since there is a maximum number of homes within each planning area, that if cluster product was proposed then there would be add~t~oqal open space; Specified that on page 3-3 of the Specific Plan, on Table 3.1 there was a detailed land use plan; Via overheads, provided examples of Low Medium Density product where the minimum lot size would be 4,000 square feet; prese]gted the plotted homesites within the first phase, noting that in Neighborhood I the actual lot average size was approximately 8,954 square feet, and that in Neighborhood II the actual average lot size was 7,881 square feet; and additionally presented the smaller lot sizes; Specified that the Arroyo Park would be 13.8 acres, lnoting that approximately 7.5 acres were required for mitigation purposes; With respect to the homes w th a ey access, re ayed that n Phase , one neighborhood comprised of 72 homes would have alley access, relaying that with the alley element, the lot s~zes would not be reduced; and Noted that the lake feature would not function as a detention/retention basin. information: For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Bob Smith, traffic engineer relayed the following: With respect to the traffic study, noted that the anal~ ordinary assumptions due to the location of the ceni epresenting the applicant, rsis did not consider out-of-the- er (and the potential to encourage pedestrian use), noting that the trips generated from the center were taken into account, clarifying that the full ~mpact was analyzed, and that ~f pedestnan travel occurred ~t would be a benefit ~n the reduction of the anticipated traffic. Mr. Becker further clarified that if the propos clustering elements, and implementation of the Vill~ pedestrian use, those reduction in trips would be a Addressing Mayor Pro Tem Roberts' queries, Mr. Becke .~d project plan with the .ge Center Concept stimulated :~onus. · noted the following: That the transit system would include both an interior system (a single shuttle for circulation throughout the project for those who livelin the Harveston community), and an outside system (the applicant has agreed toI fund the cost up to 300,000 for a broader system); and I That Lennar Communities would be involved in the project during the construction of the homes, along with other builders, noting that Lennar Communities would be designing the architecture for the first phases in order to assure that a quality product is implemented. ] Commenting on the proposed plan, Councilman Stone r~layed the following: b tltt t t h' ' th That this particular project would be the City's es a emp a ac ~ev~ng e Village Concept, relaying the plan for 20,000 square feet oI commercial space adjacent to the lake, Mr. Davis confirming that pedestrian trips to this center were not taken into account and would act as a bonus with respect to a reduction in vehicle trip generation counts; and That the incorporation of paseos would encourage pedestrian activity, Mr. Becker confirming that the paseos would be maintained by lhe HOA; and that with respect to the lake and the Lake Park, relayed that there would be unrestricted public access to the Lake Park while the surface of the lake would be restricted to the homeowners, and both (the lake and the Lake Park HOA. For Councilman Stone, Mr. Storm advised that while the deleted from the proposal due to Fire Department issues streets with landscaped parkways, and numerous cul-de would be maintained by the traffic calmers (chokers) were there would be narrower sacs would have planting areas with trellises and arbors which would create a pleasing a~sthetic appearance. / Addressing Councilman Stone's questions, Mr. Becker c~)nfirmed the following: / That for the construction of the Overcrossing Project, right-of-way would be dedicated to the City (for whatever configuration of linterchange is ultimately created); relayed the applicant's opposition to this dedication being included in the Conditions of Approva (due to ega issues and theI lack of a nexus), advising that t was the applicant s op~mon that the dedication should be solely be part of the DA; noted additionally, that language has been added to the DA to allow the $7 million for off-site street improvements to be redirected by City staff at its discretion (i.e., for the design of the interchange). In response Councilman Stone recommended that at least $1 million of these fund be considered for the CIP to initiate the construction of the bridge. 15 Noting the Planning Commission's recommendation for the surface of the lake to be open to the public, Mayor Comerchero questioned whether the applicant would be ~n agreement to giving the citizens of Temecula the lake, the Lake Park, and the a ph theater, f the C ty could work on ~ts end to estab ~sh an avenue for accepting these elements. In response Mr. Becker noted the applicant's ~greement, concurring that there would be issues associated with the matter for the ~C~ty and the applicant to work out. Mayor Comerchero noting that per initial discussion~ with Director of Community Services Parker, it was the City's desire to assume half the cost of the lake maintenance, the HOA assuming the remaining half andlmaintaining the park itself. Relaying agreement, Mr. Becker noted the need to establish (with City staff) reasonable rules and regulations due to the central location of the lake, For information purposes, Mayor Comerchero noted that per additional investigation, was more feasible for the City, as an entity, to secure, attaining liability insurance The Public is Invited to Comment The following individuals spoke as proponents of the project: Dr. Robert Wheeler Mr. Rodolfo Martinez Mr. David E. Rosenthal Mr. John Kelliher Ms. Joan Tussing MS. Jennifer Thurmond Ms. Pamela Voit 29090 Camino Alba Murrieta 43714 Buckeye Road 27315 Jefferson Avenue J. 29909 Corte Castille 28165 Jefferson Avenue 39811 Knollridge Drive 43922 Carentan Drive 48 The above-mentioned individuals were in favor of the project representing SWRiversideManufacturersCounci] for the following reasons: / The project, as proposed, is a great plan with beautif ~ul imaginary concepts, additionally noting the benefits of the pedestr~an-onentabon. ! Referencing Ms. Miod's four-page letter, noted the delveloper's efforts to aid in traffic solutions. Recommended that the City of Temecula enhance the pubic transit system in conjunct on w th the C ty of Murr eta w~th an ~nterurban transit system w~th ~nter- urban connectors. Relayed accolades to the developer for effectively ad Planning Commission's, and staff's comments. Advised that there was a need to address growth; an the proposed diverse housing products. Noted gratification due to the applicant's agreement t to be accessible to the public. Implored the City Council to consider the greater goo when voting on this project. Jressing the community's, the commended the applicant for allow the surface of the lake for the citizens of Temecula This project would attract business firms to the area :tue to the diverse housing products offered. This particular project supersedes other developments would be a benefit to the City. The major negative traffic impacts in the City of Tern development, and not this project. This proposal is advantageous to the City due to the development would appeal to, commending the appl living units. in the City of Temecula and ;cula were due to the County's wide range of age groups this cant for the proposed assisted- Noted enthusiasm about this particular project, relaying that good long-term planning for growth would be beneficial for the community, no ing appreciation for the amenities that the Harveston Project offered (i.e., traffic solutions, pedestrian- oriented concepts, the wonderful ambience the project would prowde), advising that if other developers would replicate the standards in t lis project, that Temecula would be benefited. The Harveston Project sets a new high set of standa 'ds for development in Temecula. ~' Applauded the developer with respect to proposed tr ~nsit opportunities. Rela ed the b f t f th .... ~ y ene i s o e implememadon of the vill~tge L;oncept. / In response to Councilman Naggar, Dr. Wheeler noted that in light of the future anticipated transportation problems his solution would b~ to implement a massive public transit system, opining that this implementation would be effective in the City of Temecula. For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Kelliher relayed that this project plan included numerous family activities that he considered a benefit, additionallylnoting his pleasure that the applicant agreed to Mayor Comerchero's recommendation' to have the surface of the lake be publicly accessible; and advised that his Temecu'la neighborhood did not have the pedestrian activities to offer that Harveston proposedL / The following individuals spoke in opposition to the project: r~ MS. Michelle Anderson 43797 Barletta Street r~ Mr. Mark Broderick 45501 Clubhouse Drive u Ms. Penny Alexander-Kelley 600 N. Arrowhead SanBernardino r~ MS. Pamela Miod 30995 Via Saltio Redhawk r~ Mr. Carl Ross 43886 Butternut Drive r~ Mr. Chris Pedersen 31052 Wellington Circle 17 representing CitlzensFIrstof the TemeculaVa[ley representing Channell Corporation The above-mentioned individuals were not in favor of the project for the following reasons: the development concepts, and the proposed · 'While acknowledging pleasure with amhitectural designs, expressed concern regarding the traffic generated by the project, specifically on Winchester Road. The negative impacts related to air quality. · 'The proposed densities are too high, recommending the elimination of the lots under 5,000 square feet, that the Low Medium Density lot.. have a 7,200 square foot minimum, and that no more than thirty pement (30%', of the lots be 5,000 square feet. · 'Expressed concern regarding adequate parking for tl~ose accessing the lake. / ~' The rural character of this area needs to be maintain~ed. This project is incompatible with respect to land use in relation to the Winchester Highlands Business Park, specifically due to the prop, osed location of the Community Park and the mix of truck traffic with the park patrons. / ~' Noted the need for the Interchange Project to be cCo°nmsPtlreu~id~naosthisWellproject.as an Alternative Transportation System implemented, prior to the ' f ' ' Advised that the most vital amenity that could be offE red was free-flowing traffic. Opposed to the option for 2,000 square foot lots. Relayed that the City of Temecula is currently meeting the diverse housing needs of the residents. In response to Councilman Stone, Mr. Ross relayed that ,if the 2,000 square foot lots were eliminated from the project, his only concern would be traffic and air quality issues, noting his pleasure with the proposed hometown character of the project. The following individuals spoke (as representatives of th(~ City of Murrieta) to the project: [] Mr. Jack VanHaaster [] Mr. Jim Miller / 24641 Washington Ave. Murdeta 2662 Beckman Court Murriet~ in opposition representing the City of Murrleta representing the City Of Murrleta The above-mentioned individuals were opposed to the p, oject, as configured, for the following reasons: · ' Referencing a letter from Lennar Communities dated May 21st, which stated that any impacts to the City of Murrieta would be constructed, md paid for in full by Lennar Communities, relayed a desire for this agreement to be included in the DA. With respect to the DA agreement, noted Murrieta's )pposition to the Harveston Project being exempt from any future Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), regardless of the developer's participation ~ AD 161. The City of Temecula Development Impact Fee (DIF does not include provisions for the Cherry/Date Street Interchange or the French Valley Flyover. Expressed concern regarding the rezoning of 113 ac res to Commercial Retail, recommending that a portion of the sales tax revenu. ;s should be dedicated to completing the entire interchange project. The traffic studies relies on Clinton Keith Road going through, Butterfield Stage Road to the 1-15 going through, a Murrieta Hot Springs Ro~ ~d/Highway 79 Flyover, and a bridge across Murrieta Creek, none of which are certain to be completed, recommending continuing this item until the County I'{as completed the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP). · 'With respect to the right-of way dedication, noted that the ten acres would calculate to $135,000. ¢ The traffic study is flawed. ¢ Noted a desire to have additional information regardi ~g what the traffic study requires, what items that are Conditions of Approval Ire additionally included in the DA, what credits the applicant is receiving for flood c~)ntrol/drainage fees, what the school credits are, and what the Federal Permits have required, and a desire for there to be a fair share with respect to the Interchang~e Project; and requested that , the City Council continue this item until information isI provided regarding Harveston s true contributions. For Councilman Naggar, Mr. VanHaaster relayed that the City of Murrieta opined that the traffic study was flawed due to the assumption that tl'{e project will be completed in five years ergo there will be no Levels of Service going to Level F; and for Mayor Pro Tern Roberts, noted that wh'le the Interchange Project was denoted ~n the City of Murrieta's CIP that there is no designated funding for th~ project, additionally advising that the Interchange Project would require cooperation fiom the City of Murrieta. / For Councilman Stone, Mr. Miller relayed that at the Planning Commission hearing he had addressed the need to reconsider the project s exernpbon from any TUMF, and the need for the project's mitigation to be further investigated. With respect to the County's development, Councilman Stone noted the inappropriate impacts to the City of Temecula, as well as Murrieta; advised that it appeared that the Harveston Development was being targeted for the traffic conditions that have been created outside of both of the Cities' control, noting that working together to address these outside conditions would be beneficial. In response, Mr. Miller relayed that the sole avenue for correcting the new development; advising that in the City of Murrieta th~ required the applicants to pay any future TUMF; relayed above the DIF with regard to the Harveston Project was ~ 19 traffic impacts was recent negotiated DAs that the $1500 per unit paid ~ot reflected in the DA; for Councilman Naggar, noted that without the interchange, the City of Murrieta would not allow the Ynez Road connection; and confirmed that witl~ respect to traffic counts on Murrieta Hot Springs Road, there was a thirteen-point-four percent (13.4%) increase from last year to the current year, noting the assumed projected future increases, confirming that the proposed improvements to this area were not taken into consideration. The meeting recessed at 10:27 P.M., reconvening at 10:38. P.M. The Applicant's Rebuttal Mr. Becker addressed the following issues: With respect to Ms. Anderson's comments that the project's densities were too high in her opinion, reiterated that different segments of the population had varied housing needs and requ'rements wh'ch th's project would provide. t Wi h respect to the air quality issue, noted that the applicant had provision of a letter written by the applicant's air quality consultant which addressed this matter, providing a technical response; provided additional ~nformat~on regarding a Statement of Overriding Consideration for A~r Qual~ty~ and for Councilman Naggar, noted that air quality was improving and was expectE to reach full attainment in this basin area by the year 2010. Noting that he sits on a committee of the AQMD, Ma additional information regarding the AQMD's role in and relayed that a recent study revealed that sevent in the Southcoast Basin comes from mobile sources Comerchero provided ?itigating air quality impacts; percent (70%) of the pollution and that seventy to eighty percent (70%-80%) of the mobile pollution comes fr( ~ diesel, noting the subsequent regulations which would ultimately reduce diesel fuel !use. With respect to Mr Broderick's comments, noted the lapplicant's discussions with Mr. Brodenck, relaying the d~ff~cult~es ~n explaining the technical complexities of the General Plan Amendment, advising that his issues which were relayed earlier have been resolved to staff's and the Planning Commission's satisfaction, noting that while the applicant would continue discussions with Mr. Broderick, that many of his concerns were based on m~s~nformat~on; and w~th respect to the Land Use Plan, relayed that the proposal is compatible in a positive ~anner, advising that there was justification for every type of housing type; and with respect to Open Space, reiterated that the plan included doubling the amount of parks and Open Space denoted in the existing Genera P an. With respect to negative impacts on Winchester and Margarita Roads, reiterated that based on the analys~s, the applicant was ~mplement~ng three bmes more mitigation on the arterial streets than the project will add, in tern ~s of traffic, which would be a substantial benefit to the community. With respect to comments regarding maintaining the 'ural character of this portion of the City, referencing an aerial photograph, noted that the property was surrounded by Industrial, Commercial, and Residential developm .~nt that does not have the same type of architectural character proposed ~n the Harveston Project. 2O With respect to the concerns raised by the Channeil Corporation's representative, expressed thanks to the corporation for its articulation regarding the concerns raised, and the spec f c recommendabons w~th respect to appropnate COAs to be imposed, clarifying that the applicant was in agreement with thb proposals (via the memo provided by Channell Corporation). With respect to Ms. Miod's and Ms. Anderson's comments, noted that air quality ~ssues have been prewously addressed; and w~th respect to the safety of chddren I v ng n the community, concurred w~th the ~mportance of th~s ~ssue; and offered to contribute to the funding of the previously-mentioned pedestrian bridge project, if the C ty Counc viewed this contribution as appropriate. With respect to Mr. VanHaaster's comments, noted the developer's current project in the City of Murrieta with a successful interaction with Ithe City staff and the City Council; relayed disappointment that the Harveston Piroject had been targeted due to the broader issues between the two Cities; with respect to the TUMF, noted that the scope and nature of the program are unclear at this point; with respect to the Harveston Project, specified that the donation of ten acres of land for an interchange, and the creation of numerous mulb-laned arterials were the type of regional-serving arterial improvements that the TUMF will be credited ioward, nohng the redundancy of charging a TUMF, and subsequently crediting back for those improvements; regarding comments with respect to rezomng the Service Commercial property, clarified that this property and been zoned as such fora lengthy period of time, relaying that this process had been noticed, prowd~ng opportunlbes for comments, advising that this issue must be a misunderstanding; End provided additional information regarding the traffic analysis, requesting Mr. Davis to present technical clarification. Mr. Davis (primarily), and Mr. Becker provided the follow With respect to Mr. VanHaaster's questions regardin! improvements and mitigation measures within the Gl1 ng data regarding traffic issues: the fair share calculations for ' of Murrieta, reiterated the reference of the letter which had been submitted by Eennar Communities to the City of Murrieta which proposed to pay for the entire mitigation of those improvements upfront, and prior to the first phase of the project, Mr. IBecker clarifying that this agreement entailed funding more than ten times the amount denoted in the fair share analysis. With respect to issues related to Clinton Keith Road onnection, the connections to the 1-15 from the southern end of town, and the Western Bypass, advised that these ~ssues are not related to the project s traffic study, clarifying that the analys~s d~d not assume any of those projects to be in place. With respect to growth issues, clarified that the study assumed a five percent (5%) growth rate n reg onal development and traffic, not~ng that the analys~s took ~nto account the specific development projects in the area of influence and subsequently added additional development throughout the area tolcome up with the five percent (5%) growth per year, compounded; and provided additional information regarding the likely cause of the thirteen percent (13%) increas~ of traffic on Murrieta Hot Springs Road. For Councilman Naggar, additional information was provided regarding the analysis. Advised that this traffic analysis was a sound approach with reasonable assumptions. CEQA With respect to the queuing problem on the Winchester Road Offramp, noted that the improvements associated with this project would addI an additional lane to the offramp and provide relief at this intersection, as welllas at other approaches to this intersection; and provided additional information regarding changes in volumes due to a ternate improvements completed (i.e., the Murri~ta Hot Springs Road Project). Provided additional information regarding th ' t I ' t empac s assoc aea with the Ynez Extension Project being completed. For Councilman Naggar, relayed that the Margarita Road corridor would be improved by this project, confirming that the analysis revealed that some of the traffic generated from the project would utilize Margarita Road to Murneta Hot Springs Road to the interchange, noting that this traffic was recognized in the study, clarifying that there was no assumption that Ynez Road would bo through. > With respect to the 2005 projected year for the completion of development, clarified that s nce th s determ ned date ~t has been realized that the Service Commercial area would most likely not develop by the year 2005 which will reduce half the project's projected trips while all the improvements will be in place. / > With respect to cumulative effects, provided additional information regarding the fair concept, h > With respect to Mr. Miller's comments, clarified that t e applicant has offered to accelerate the improvements which would have a more benehc~al ~mpact; and adwsed that the series of project analys~s requested by the C~ty of Murneta has been available from Temecula staff for a lengthy period, noting that at the C~ty Councd s d rect on the eppl cant would be wdhng to prowde whatever level of detad wes requested. Continuing his comments, Mr. Becker offered the following information: Thanked Mr. Ross for his accolades regarding the project, clarifying that the Balboa Product's minimum square lot size was approximately 3,500 square feet, and not 2,000 square feet. ~ With respect to Mr. Pedersen's comments, noted the applicant's respectful disagreement that the project was based on false assumptions; and advised that the concept of diversity was good end attainable. ~ With respect to bus transport, clarified the creation oflnew opportunities, while there wes no assumption that citizens would fully utilize these options. Requested that the letters from Mr. Bob Davis (addn ~ssing the concerns of the City of Murrieta), and from Mr. Hunts Drew (regarding air lquality issues) be made part of the record. Clarified that while the applicant agreed to numerous recommendations from the Channell Corporation, that with respect to the request for an Industrial Designation on portions of the Service Commercial area, that the applicant was not in agreement with this item. The City Council Closing Deliberations MOTION: In light of the concerns voiced by representati' res of the City of Murrieta, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to continue this item to t~e August 14, 2001 City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below.) Tem I ' Reiterating the City of ecu a s opinion that the County was not taking into consideration the City's concerns, Councilman Stone ad~,ised that it was not his desire for it to appear to the representatives of the City of Murri, Temecula was doing to them what the County has done; Subcommittee, and the applicant's representatives meet VanHaaster to come to a resolution prior to the next Cit ;ta as though the City of and recommended that the with Mr. Miller, and Mr. Council meeting. Noting that he, too, would desire to have mass transit iml Temecula, Councilman Stone recommended placing this the citizens to determine whether they were willing to tax residence. Councilman Pratt advised that once a full bus congestion is relieved. Via overheads, Councilman Pratt presented the Open ~ ,.ace areas included in the Wolf Creek and Harveston Projects; provided a comparison o~ residential nodes in the community; relayed the surrounding communities' and the County areas' development; presented a transit plan for addressing traffic which woul~ be further specified at the Ju~y 26th Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting; conclude8 that the addiction of the American citizen to the automobile has been made it the Iplague of prosperity, noting the need for public transportation, specifying information regarding ~mplement~ng a plan for such w th n a s x-month penod of t~me w~th a pro-rata share (to cover the three-year Temecula Transit System's start up and operating costs) at an initial cost of an approximate $212 assessment per residence. ~lemented in the City of issue on the ballot in order for themselves $212 per transit system is implemented, Mayor Comerchero relayed Lennar Communities' agreement to fund the operation of three buses, providing additional information regarding thle potential amenities prov ded on these buses; and advised that this program should belimplemented in order to evaluate whether a bus system would be effective in the City of Temecula. Councilman Pratt clarified that based on his investigation~!if a complete bus system is not implemented with easy access (whereas an individual could go to the corner and catch a bus), the bus system will not work. At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous al aroval of the motion. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS ClTY MANAGER'S REPORT Noadditionalcomments. ClTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT With respect to the closed session, City Attorney Thorso reportable items. ADJOURNMENT At 11:48 P.M., Mayor Comerchero formally adjourned th RCIP Workshop to be held on Tuesday, August 14, 2001 the next regular meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Park Drive, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] noted that there were no City Council meeting to the at 5:30 P.M., to be followed by Chambers, 43200 Business Jeff Comerchero, Mayor MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 14, 2001 The City of Temecula City Council convened n an adjourhed workshop meeting at 5:39 of Temecula City Hall, P.M., on Tuesday, August 14, 2001, in the City Council Cl~ambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ~ / ALLEGIANCE ] The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Naggar. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, '~Roberts, Stone, and Mayor Comerchero. * Mayor Pro Tem Roberts arrived at 5:41 P.M. Absent: Councilmember: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS No reports. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1 Seventh Workshop for the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and file. Mr. Jim Henderson, Project Manager, provided an update of the Plan, noting the following: Accomplishments of the Project Team Land Use and Circulation Elements of th~ General Plan Air Quality and Noise Element - has not )een completed; driven by the Circulation Element; will be completed by the Fall; draft General Plan will be available for review by the end of the year / General Plan input will be taken from impacted ~ities R:\Minutes\081401 ,, Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) - draft plan should be available by the end of this month · Cities' impacts will be reviewed and discussed · Completed outline of Implementation Agl cities will be required to sign Community Environmental Transportation Acce · Resource agencies have been pursuing Western Riverside County are adequatel · Practicality balance · Alternatives will be expanded to include I eement as part of MSHCP - all ~tability Process (CETAP) ~genda to ensure resources of protected ,brid alternative to include Date Street from SR 79 to 1-15; significant improvements beyond what Caltrans has proposed as the ultimate build out for both 1-15 and 1-215 evaluation criteria 8 · Tier I environmental documents have be n hearings in early Spring. In response the Council comments, Mr. Henderson stated t · Traffic model should be available during Environmental documents will be completed until concurrence on the completed and are to prepared for following: he City summit (September 6, 2001) · Have completed several scenarios; ident~ying Environmental impact alternatives · Density bonuses - increased density in areas identified as community centers; have addressed diminished and !increasing density; density program and implementation still under discussionI LanI · d has not yet been designated for MSHCP; 153,000 acres (approximately 55,000 units Western Riverside County ~lide) will be designated Councilman Naggar encouraged the County to schedule public hearings within jurisdictions that may be impacted by density bonus program, d · County's vision to encourage evelopmer~t in areas where infrastructure is in place to serve it · Circulation Element has been reviewed w, ith and without Clinton Keith Road; a connector road for east/west travel has been proposed; so decisions have been reached R:\Minutes\081401 2 Alternatives 5a and 5b - will attempt to ~ dnimize the development attraction of these alternatives; not intended to be ~ rowth inducing; intended to solve traffic issues a s Public transportation will be ignificant part of this process; 30% of transit use has been proposed w~th~n ~denbfled r~odes and 15 Yo transit use between the nodes; right-of-way efforts must be reserved in order to complete this task · Biological consultants are of the opinion to create to a workable MSHCP that would include Clinton Keith Road Plan for Riverside · That originally the 10-year Strategic Transit Authority did not include the SR 79 corridor; that SR 79 is included as a CETAP corridor; that SR 79 has now been included in thelStrategic Plan; that efforts are underway to reserve the needed right-of-ways. Noting that the City continues to adhere to its General Plan, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts expressed concern with the County continuing to not adhere to its General Plan and, as well, expressed frustration with the acceleration of the process. ~ Advising that the City has concerns with the MSHCP as it r~lates to the neighboring cities and the potential economical impacts, Mayor Comerchero questioned why more land will not be set aside for French Valley, viewing it as an ideal area; CITY MANAGER'S REPORT There were no additional comments. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT There were no additional comments. R:\Minutes\081401 ADJOURNMENT At 6:23 P.M., Mayor Comerchero formally adjourned the Ci' August 14, 2001, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chamben Temecula, California. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\081401 Council meeting to Tuesday, 43200 Business Park Drive, Jeff Comerchem, Mayor ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 01- / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL~ OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: / Section 1. That the following claims and demandsas set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Mar~,ager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,702,210.52. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 9th da ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2001/Flesos 01- this resolution. of October, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the C~ty Councd of the City of Temecula on the 9th day of October, 2001 by the foll¢ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- wing roll call vote: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk 09/20/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/27/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10/09/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/27/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: T.-3TAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 10109/01 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 192 194 210 261 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/IVIOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TCSD - DEBT SERVICE CFD 88-12 DEBT SVC FUND CFD 98-1 DEBT SVC FUND GENERAL FUND ROA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COIV~UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-ClP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERWCES FACiLiTIES TOTAL BY FUND: ;HhWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMAN£ S $ 216,942.25 747,148.22 1,506,523.30 $ 2.702,210.52 416,492,84 14,098,56 69.478,44 39.78 27,304.31 3,611.07 1,486.474.90 544.90 11,299.87 22,323.31 %015.89 5,795.00 345,288.10 41,536,73 3,908,35 41.997.35 62.52 527.00 1,680.44 852.37 6,897.93 2,369.56 $ 2,470,613.77 23t,596.75 $ 2,702,210.52 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. . HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOW:~I,3 IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 09/20/01 ~8:28 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 96,071.04 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 11.00 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 37,785.23 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 10,237.62 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 3~270.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 2,738.40 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 4,312.85 320 ~NFORMATION SYSTEMS 14~123.~ 340 FACILITIES 2~655.61 460 CFD 88-12 DENT SERVICE FUND 41~536.73 471 CFD 98-1ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 4,200.00 TOTAL 216,942.25 PAGE 8 VOUCHRE2 09/20/01 08:28 VOUCNER/ CNECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 10918 09/18/01 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL 72003 09/20/01 000434 ACCELA.COM 72003 09/20/01 000434 ACCELA.£OM 72004 09/20/01 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 72005 09/20/01 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, 72005 09/20/01 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, 72006 09/20/01 004446 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIV 72007 09/20/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 72007 09/20/01 000101 APPLE ONE, IRC. 72007 09/20/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 72008 09/20/01 003266 ARGUS DATA SECURITY 72009 09/20/01 004206 BANUELOS, TERESA 72010 09/20/01 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 72010 09/20/01 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 72011 09/20/01 BLUMENTHAL~ JENNIFER 72012 09/20/01 004225 BURL SLONE COUNTRY MUSI 72013 09/20/01 001260 C P R B 72014 09/20/01 004618 CALIF NARCOTIC OFFICERS 72015 09/20/01 001374 CALIF SECRETARY OF STAT 72016 09/20/01 CALPERS CONFERENCE 2001 72017 09/20/01 004093 CARDIO CARE PLUS 72017 09/20/01 004093 CARDIO CARE PLUS 72018 09/20/01 002534 CATERERS CAFE 72019 09/20/01 001555 CNRISTOPHERBOR FIRE PRO 72020 09/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 72020 07/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 72020 ~9/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 72020 09/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF NEMET 72020 09/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF NEMET 72020 09/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF NEMET 72020 09/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF NEMET 72020 09/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF MEMET 72020 0~/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF NEMET CITY OF TEMEGULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CFD 88-12 DEBT SVC ADDL PAY ON-SITE ASST:PERMIT+ WORKFLOW MIGRATION SERVICES TO SQL DAY CAMP BUS:MULLIGAN~S OCT STORAGE UNIT:C115 AUG/SEPT STORAGE RENTAL:B11 MEMBERSHIP:S.BARVEY & G.BUTI ER TEMP HELP ~/E 8/25 ROSS TEMP NELP ~/E 09/01BMITH/W'TR TEMP NELP W/E 08/18 CRAMER OFFSITE RECORDS STORAGE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS LAB DRUG TEBTING:POLICE/CHP LAB DRUG TESTING:POLICE/CNP REFUND:GYMNASTICS-EARLY TUNBLE CNOA CONF:11/17-20:(3)OFFICERS PUBLIC FAC FINANCING CORP FEE ANNUAL CONF:10/22-24:G.YATE~ TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS CPR CERTIF:RECREATION STAFF REFRSNMNTS:RORIPAUGH RANCH TCC SEMI-ANNUAL FIRE SYB TEST RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:POLICE RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:PW ADMI~ RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:PW MNTC RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:PW LAND RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:B&S DEPI RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:TCSD RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:PW CIP RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:INFO BYS RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:FIRE DEF ACCOUNT NUMBER IRT 460'1040 320-1980 320'199-999-5250 190-183-999-5340 001-162-999-5234 320-199-999-5238 001'165'999-5226 001'110-999'5118 001-162-999-5118 190-186-999-5118 001'120'999'5277 190-183-999-5330 001-170-999-5328 001-170-999-5328 190-183-4982 280-199-999-5362 190-180'999-5254 001'170'999-5261 001-140'999'5226 001-150-999-5258 190-183'999-5330 190'180'999-5261 [G 001-161-999-5260 190-184-999-5250 001-170-999-5215 001-164-604-5215 001-164-601-5215 001-163-999-5215 001-162-999-5215 190-180-999-5215 001-165-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 ITEM AMOUNT 41,536.73 1,968.75 1,915.84 368.92 130.00 248.00 410.00 78.00 845.65 36.40 145.50 170.00 1,498.10 259.50 35.00 50.00 55.25 915.00 20.00 250.00 288.00 60.00 125.70 65.00 222.00 639.00 3,586.00 547.00 1~684.75 2~529.75 753.00 334.50 1,152.00 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 41,536.73 3,884.59 368.92 378.00 410.00 960.05 145.50 170.00 1,757.60 35.00 50.00 55.25 915.00 20.00 250.00 348.00 125.70 65.00 VOUCBRE2 09/20/01 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 72020 72020 72021 72022 72022 72023 72024 72024 72024 72024 72024 72024 72024 72025 72025 72025 72026 72027 72028 72029 72029 72030 72030 72030 72030 72030 72030 72031 72031 72031 72031 72031 72032 72032 72032 72033 72034 08:28 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 0g/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 0~/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES 002413 DALEY & HEFT 002413 DALEY & HEFT 004450 DENNIS A HIBBERT PLUMBI 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E $ I EMPLOYMENT BERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 003572 EAGLE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 003572 EAGLE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 003572 EAGLE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 000523 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER 003223 EDAW 003171 EMPIRE ECONOMICS LLO 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS [NC 000165 FEDERAL EXPREBB INC 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOC 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOC 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOC 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOC 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOC 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003271 FORMA SYSTEMS 003531 GATEWAY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:EMER STN RADIO MNTC CONTRACT:CODE EN OR OCT RENT:POLICE STOREFRONT APR-JUN LEGAL SERVICES CREDIT:UNAUTHORIZED WORK AQUATICS PLUMBING REPAIRS TEMP HELP W/E 09/07 RUSB TEMP HELP W/E 09/07 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 09/07 NANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 09/07 BANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 09/07 BANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 09/07 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 09/07 OBMANN 320-199-999-5215 001-161-999-5215 001-170-999-5229 001-2642 001-2642 190-186-999-5212 001-161-999-5118 340-199-701-5118 001-164-604-5118 190-180-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-120-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 1,260.00 585.00 1,661.73 1,468.00 162.00- 1,495.00 1,840.70 1,194.40 46.32 46.32 1,047.99 1,105.89 1,425.75 13,293.00 1,661.73 1,306.00 1,495.00 6,707.37 CITY AERIAL PHOTO CD SOFTWARE FREIGHT SALES TAX 95366-02 DIEGO DR LDSC BIOLOGICAL GVC:PALA RD BRDG 001-163-999-5248 001-163-999~5248 001-163-999-5248 193-180-999-5240 210-165-631-5801 3,500.00 25.00 262.50 324.46 569.74 3,787.50 324.46 569.74 MRKT ABSORPTION:HARVESTON CFD 001-2643 3,500.00 3,500.00 CREDIT:PLAN CK 01-1957 JULY 2001 PLAN CHECK SVCS EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 100.00- 001-162-999-5248 3,479.56 3,379.56 001-164-604-5230 001-161-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 165-199-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 11.00 12.92 12.92 11.00 13.83 12.92 74.59 FINANCIAL SVCS:BUTTERFIELD CFD 001-2600 FINANCIAL SVCS:HARVESTOM CFD 001-2643 FINANCIAL SVCS:BARVESTON CFD 001-2643 FINANCIAL SVCS:BUTTEBFIELD EFD 001-2600 FINANCIAL SVCS:BUTTERFIELD CFD 001-2600 3,195.00 16,813.68 4,663.68 12,519.78 2,325.65 39,517.79 XX-3083 NAGGAR:MTG/SUPPLIES 001-100-999-5260 XX-3083 NAGGAR:MTG/SUPPLIES 001-100-999-5220 XX-2576 NELSON:PROF MTG IN TWN 001-110-999-5258 60.92 1.50 57.00 119.42 GIS:ArcAt[as FOR ArView 3.2 EE COMPUTER PRGM: S.WILLIAM( 001-161-610-5606 284.38 284.38 001-1175 1,817.58 1,817.58 VOUCHRE2 09/20/01 68:28 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 72035 09/20/01 004243 GHERARDI, LUCIANO 72036 09/20/01 00017-/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 72036 09/20/01 000177 GLENNIEB OFFICE PRODUCT 72036 09/20/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 72036 09/20/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 72036 09/20/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 72037 09/20/01 GUTIERREZ, BETH 72038 09/20/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 72039 09/20/01 002372 HARMON, JUDY 72039 09/20/01 002372 HARMON, JUDY 72040 09/20/01 004242 HARMONY ARTISTS 72041 09/20/01 004217 HYDRO TEK COMPANY 72042 09/20/01 004613 ICE HOUSE 72042 09/20/01 004613 ICE HOUSE 72043 0~/20/01 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL BUPPL 72044 09/20/01 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS 72045 09/20/01 003046 K F R 0 G 95.1FM RADIO 72045 09/20/01 003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO 72045 09/20/01 003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO 72046 09/20/01 003631 KLEINFELDER INC 72047 09/20/01 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE 72047 09/20/01 000945 L P B COMPUTER SERVICE 72048 09/20/01 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. 72048 0~/20/01 004412 LEAHDERf KERRY D. 72048 09/20/01 004412 LEANDERi KERRY D. 72049 09/20/01 004599 LONG BEACH AQUARIUM OF ?2049 09/20/01 004599 LONG BEACH AQUARIUM OF 72050 09/20/01 004087 LOWE'S 72051 ~9/20/01 003782 MAIN STREET BIGNS 72052 09/20/01 004141 MAINTEX INC 72052 09/20/01 004141 MAINTEX INC 72052 09/20/01 004141 MAIHTEX IHC 72052 09/20/01 004141 MA]NTEX ]NC 72052 09/20/01 004141 MAINTEX INC CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NGTS OFFICE SUPPLIES:RECREATION OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSD OFFICE SUPPLIES:MUSEUM OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE DEPT REIHB:ROUNDTABLE MTG MILEAGE HARDWARE SUPPLIES:STATION B~ TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NGTS 917 MOBILE MUSIC SYS:CRC SWIM PRTY POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS RADIO AD:HOT SUMMER HGTS NETWORK CLIENT SVCS:INF SYS RADIO AD:SUMMER NGTS OLD TWNI RADIO AD:SUMMER NGTS OLD TWN JUN-JUL CITYWIDE AC REPAIRS HP LASERJET PRINTER:POLICE SALES TAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCBD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS YOUTH ADMISSIONS:DAY CAMP ADULT ADMISSIONS:DAY CAMP HARDWARE SUPPLIES:STATION 8~ SIGNS FOR PW MAINT CREWS TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIE~ SR CTR CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES VAR PARKS CUSTODIAL SUPPLIE~ PAGE 3 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 280-199-999-5362 250.00 250.00 190-181-999-5220 42.40 190-182-999-5220 23.42 190-180-999-5220 53.27 190-185-999-5220 24.11 001-170-999-5220 49.55 192.75 001-150-999-5262 38.~ 38.64 001-171-999-5212 184.45 184.45 190-183-999-5330 364.00 190-183-999-5330 580.80 944.80 280-199-999-5362 600.00 600.00 001-164-601-5215 269.50 269.50 190-183-999-5320 150.00 190-183-999-5320 150.00 300.00 190-186-999-5250 190.28 190.28 320-199-999-5248 1,207.30 1,207.30 280-199-999-5362 1~020.00 280-199-999-5362 100.00 280-199-999-5362 92.85 1~212.85 001-16Y+-601-5248 2~066.50 2,066.50 001-170-999-5604 1~617.00 001-170-999-5604 121.28 1,738.28 190-183-999-5330 208.00 190-183-999-5330 106.00 190-183-999-5330 220.00 534.00 190-183-999~5340 227.50 190~183-999-5340 59.70 287.20 001-171-999-5212 8.79 8.79 001-164-601-5244 212.74 212.74 190-184-999-5212 92.75 190-182-999-5212 64.04 340-199-701-5212 223.00 190-181-999-5212 132.13 190-180-999-5212 296.78 VOUCHRE2 09/20/01 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 72052 72053 72053 ?2054 72055 72056 72057 72058 72058 72058 72058 72059 72059 72059 72059 72060 72060 72060 72061 72061 72062 72062 72063 72064 72064 72064 72064 72064 72065 72066 72066 72066 72066 72067 72068 !78:28 CHECK DATE 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 69/20/01 09/20/01 G~/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 ~9/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION MAINTEX INC MAINT FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIE MANPOWER TEMPORARY BERV TEMP HELP W/E 9/02 LARKIN-MCCL MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 9/09 LARKIN-MCCL VENDOR NUMBER 004141 001967 001967 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA 002046 MASTER K 9 INC 003448 MELODYS AD WORKS 004208 MILANOB 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI 0009~ MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS 004588 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNI 004588 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNI 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 004191 NORTH COUNTY TIMES-PM? 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY 003218 PELA 003218 PELA 003218 PELA 003218 PELA 002498 PETRA GEOTECNNICAL 000249 PETTY CASH 9/04-14/01 CONSULT SERVICES AUG POLICE K-9 BOARDING SEPT SUMMER NIGBTS CONSULT SVC REFRESHMENTS:COUNCIL MTG:9/ 1 BUSINESS CARDS: LT. PINGEL SALES TAX LETTERHEAD FOR CiTY CLERKS DPT BUSINESS CARDS:S.WILLIAMS VARIOUS PARKS PLAY EQUIPMEN' TWO SPRING RISERS'PALA PARK SALES TAX MISD AUTO PARTS FIRE STN 84 CREDIT:ITEMS RETURNED MISC AUTO PARTS FIRE STN 84 BLACK BOOKCASE FOR TCSD SALES TAX AUG DISPLAY ADS:CIP CONBT UPDT RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HUMAN RES. ANNUL SUBSCRIPTION:233144:PW CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINI CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIN1 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIN1 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIN1 SALES TAX FOR INV# 18414 PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES JUL TESD LDSCP PLAN CHECK SVCS JUL LIBRARY LDSCP PLAN CK SVCS AUG TCSD LDSCP PLAN CHECK SVCS AUG TCSD LDSCP PLAN CHECK SVCS GEOTECNNICAL SVC:JEDEDIAH SMTH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PAGE 4 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 340-199-702-5212 82.25 890.95 001-161-999-5118 516.00 001-161-999-5118 412.80 928.80 001-161-999-5248 1,367.68 1,367.68 001-170-999-5327 310.00 310.00 280-199-999-5362 2,200.00 2,200.00 001-100-999-5260 156.25 156.25 001-170-999-5222 106.60 001-170-999-5222 7.99 001-120-999-5222 67.19 001-162-999-5222 42.73 224.51 190-180-999-5212 778.69 190-180-999-5212 702.00 190-180-999-5212 231.66 190-180-999-5212 111.01 1,823.36 001-171-999-5214 269.28 001-171-999-5214 277.35- 001-171-999-5214 175.72 167.65 340-199-701-5242 148.95 340-199-701-5242 11.17 160.12 001-165-999-5256 533.80 001-150-999-5254 300.00 833.80 001-164-604-5228 61.00 61.00 001-162-999-5214 459.71 190-180-999-5214 467.28 001-161-999-5214 35.45 001-161-999-5214 245.50 001-161-999-5214 4.98 1,212.92 001-171-999-5311 1,206.38 1,206.38 190-180-999-5248 4,880.00 210-199-129-5802 1,080.00 190-180-999-5248 600.00 193-180-999-5248 1,610.00 8,170.00 001-163-999-5248 360.00 360.00 190-183-999-5320 21.55 VOUCHRE2 09/20/01 08:28 VOUCHER/ CHECK CBECK NUMBER DATE 72068 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 7206B 09/20/01 72060 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 72068 09/20/01 72060 09/20/01 ?2069 09/20/01 72069 09/20/01 72069 09/20/01 72069 09/20/01 72069 09/20/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASB 000249 PETTY CASN 000249 PETTY CABN 000249 PETTY CASN 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASN 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY DASN REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASN REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMEBT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASB REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEHECULA 6 PBOTOS:ROSE PARADE FLOAT 000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA SALES TAX 000580 PBOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA AUG FILM/PHOTO DEV - LAND DEV 000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA AUG FILM/PHOTO DEV - MUSEUM 000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA AUG FILM/PHOTO DEV - TCBD 72070 09/20/01 000253 POSTMASTER 72071 09/20/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 72071 09/20/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 72071 09/20/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 72071 09/20/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 72072 09/20/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 72072 09/20/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 72072 09/20/01 000907 RANCHO CAE WASH 72073 09/20/01 004108 RANCHO TAILORS 72074 09/20/01 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING 72074 09/20/01 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS AUG 01-02-98000-0 STN #84 AUG 01-02-98010-0 STN #84 VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING TCSD VEHICLES CAR WASH TCSD VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MIBC SEWING FOR POLICE UNIFORM BULBS-MUSEUM EXHIBIT FIXTURES SALES TAX 72075 fl~/20/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RENTAL EQUIPMERT FOR PW 72076 09/20/01 000266 RIGHTWAY 72077 09/20/01 001365 RIVERSIDE CO EBVIRONMEN 72078 B9/20/01 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT 72079 09/20/01 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 72080 09/20/01 004562 SCBIRMER ENGINEERING CO 72081 09/20/01 004609 72082 09/20/01 003804 SEP EQUIP RENTAL - LONG CYN CR STENCIL TRUCK SUPPLIES FOR PW JUL FIRE PLAN CHECK SERVICESI SHREDFORCE INC DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION/RED MGMT SKYBAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS PAGE 5 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUBT 001-161-999-5214 21.48 001-161-999-5230 34.00 190-181-999-5301 13.96 001-161-999-5230 27.98 001-161-999-5260 13.43 210-190-165-5802 14.50 190-183-999-5371 13.19 210-190-170-5801 24.16 190-180-999-5261 20.73 340-199-701-5212 6.50 001-150-999-5265 34.32 190-183-999-5370 16.13 001-161-999-5262 43.23 305.16 001-111-999-5270 71.94 001-111-999-5270 5.40 001-163-999~5250 25.67 190-185-999-5250 13.43 190-180-999-5250 11.55 127.99 001-120-999-5230 38.30 38.30 001-171-999-5240 11.68 001-171-999-5240 461.30 190-180-999-5240 10,590.92 193'180-999-5240 8,289.34 19,353.24 001-171-999-5214 16.00 190'180'999-5214 59.00 190'180-999-5263 33.38 108.38 001-170-999-5243 791.00 791.00 190-185-999-5212 234.09 190-185'999'5212 17.56 251.65 001'164'601-5238 238.26 238.26 190-180-999-5238 54.38 54.38 210-199-129-5802 1,050.00 1,050.00 001-2300 3,138.46 3,138.46 001-164-601-5218 108.31 108.31 001-171-~99-5250 200.00 200.00 001-120-999-5277 351.00 351.00 190-183-999-5330 1,113.60 VOUCHRE2 09/20/01 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 72082 72083 72083 72084 72084 72084 72084 72084 72084 72084 72084 72085 72085 72085 72085 72085 72085 72085 72085 72086 72087 72088 72089 72090 72090 72090 72091 72091 72091 72092 72092 72092 72092 72093 72094 72094 72094 72094 72094 08:28 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 C9/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 003804 SKYNAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARRINGS 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 09/20/01 000645 SMART & FINAL 1NC 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 001212 SO CALIF GAB COMPANY 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES/SMART PRGM RECREATION SUPPLIES/FAMILY FUN SEPT 2-22-331-0400 G.KEARNY SEP 2-22-575-0934 GEN.KEARNY SEPT 2-10-331-1353 STN #84 SEPT 2-22-496-3462 G.KEARNY AUG 2-00-397-5059 COMM SVC ~TL SEPT 2-23-086-5263 MARGARITA REP 2-07-626-6063 R.VISTA S~RG AUG 2-19-999-9442 VARIOUS RS CITY FACILITIES GAS METERS CITY FACILITIES GAS METERS CITY FACILITIES GAS METERS CITY FACILITIES GAS METERS CITY FACILITIES GAS METERS CITY FACILITIES GAS METERS CITY FACILITIES GAS METERS SEPT 095-167-7907-2 STN #84 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR BEE HIVE REMOVAL @ RIVERTON PK 000305 TARGET STONE RECREATION SUPPLIES/SMART PRGM 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL 004541 TEMECULA RADIATOR/AUTO 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY BECURIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM jPD TOW AND REPAIR OF MEDIC SQUAD m CITY HALL LOCKSMITH SERVICE~ SENIOR CENTER LOCKSMITN SVCS PARK SITES LOCKSMITH SERVICES 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 003862 TBYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR ADA COMPLIANT ELEVATOR PHONE, SEP CITY HALL ELEV.MAINT/INSPC SEP MUSEUM ELEV. MAINT/INSPECT 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES - PW ADMIR 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR LAND DE\ 000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRG 1ST QTR EMERG.RESPONBE VOL.PRG 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCBD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS PAGE 6 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 190-183-999-5330 3,093.60 4,207.20 190-183-999-5372 137.30 190-183-999-E371 33.02 170.32 190-180-999-5319 44.39 190-180-999-5240 180.29 001-171-999-5240 1,269.47 190-180-999-5319 17.07 190-180-999-5240 3,775.36 190-180-999-5319 31.87 193-180-999-5240 13.82 190-180-999-5319 696.02 6,028.29 190-181-999-5240 13.96 190-182-999-5240 52.38 190-184-999-5240 16.39 190-185-999-5240 7.81 190-186-999-5240 40.95 190-188-999-5240 4.66 340-199-702-5240 20.33 001-171-999-5240 67.48 223.96 001-172-999-5453 132.00 132.00 190-183-999-5372 10.09 10.09 001-170-999-5214 184.80 184.80 001-171-999-5214 129.76 129.76 340-199-701-5212 30.70 190-181-999-5212 6.79 190-180-999-5212 35.43 340-199-701-5212 440.00 340-199-701-5250 135.00 190-185-999-5250 135.00 001-165-999-5220 453.41 001-165-999-5220 110.67 001-164-604-5220 331.77 001-163-999-5220 90.92 001-171-999-5274 1,620.00 190-183-999-5330 76.80 190-183-999-5330 230.40 190-183-999-5330 192.00 190-183-999-5330 358.40 190-183-999-53B0 358.40 72.92 710.00 986.77 1,620.00 VOUCHRE2 09/20/01 '~8:28 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 72095 09/20/01 003228 U S RANK TRUST NATIONAL 72096 09/20/01 000321 UBNOSKE, DEBBIE 72097 09/20/01 004486 UNION 76 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 72098 09/20/01 VERDOORN, CAROL ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION TRUSTEE ADMIN FEES CFD 98-1 REIMB:PLANNER'S INSTITUTE:3/21 001-161-999-5258 / CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE / 001-165-999-5263 REFURD:TENNIS-1NTER/ADVN AD~ILT 190-183-4982 471-199-999-5227 PAGE 7 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 4,200.00 4,200.00 32.45 32.45 39.50 39.50 55.00 55.00 72099 09/20/01 004261 VERIZOH CALIFORNIA 72099 09/20/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 72099 09/20/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 72100 09/20/01 003191 WEDEKING~ BRUCE 72101 09/20/01 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC 72102 09/20/01 003756 WHITE HOUSE SANITATION SEPT XXX-O073 GENERAL USAGE SEPT XXX-1941 PTA CD TTACSD SEPT XXX-5072 GENERAL USAGE REIMB:2 13" TELEVISIONS FY01'02 SOLID WASTE CO'OP SEPT CLEANING SVC:BTRFLD STAGE 320-199'999'5208 50.44 320'199'999'5208 5~485.21 7~189.38 340'199-701-5242 363.31 363.31 AR 194-180-999'5226 3,270.00 3,270.00 190-180-999-5250 50.00 50.00 72103 39/20/01 003607 XPECT FIRST AID 72103 09/20/01 003607 XPECT FIRST AID FIRST AID SUPPLIES - PW FIRST AID SUPPLIES - PW TOTAL CHECKS 001-164-601-5218 113.37 001-164-601-5218 196.04 309.41 216,942.25 VOUCHRE2 09/27/01 '13:17 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ABIDE 190 COMMUNITY BERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD BERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD BERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD BERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 BUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE TOTAL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS AMOUNT 116,333.07 10,879.06 31,048.21 39.78 17,066.69 341.07 208,894.48 4,345.44 557.50 8,199.54 lw015.89 3,139.39 345,288.10 747,148.22 PAGE 11 VOUCHRE2 09/27/01 ~3:17 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ~ATE NUMBER NAME 10924 09/24/01 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 09/27/01 000246 64840 U9/27/01 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERB EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RET[RE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET[RE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 72104 09/20/01 004619 SOUTH COAST ESCROW 72105 09/24/01 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09,'27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 [MSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (INS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 ~9/27/01 000283 [NSYATAX (IRS) 693198 ~9/27/01 000283 INBTATAX (IRS) 693198 0~/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 693198 0~/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INBTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRB) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 1NSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 693198 09/27/01 000283 1NBTATAX (IRS) CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TCSD COPS DEBT SVC PAYMENT 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERB-PRE 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR DEPST:FIRE STN MOOULAR FAC FUNDRAISER:SEPT 11 TRAGEDIES 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE PAGE 1 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 390-1040 345,288.10 345,288.10 001-2390 27,088.39 165-2390 660.17 190-2390 4,891.21 192-2390 11.19 193-2390 410.72 194-2390 97.53 280-2390 286.27 300-2390 139.55 320-2130 26.51 320-2390 1,153.53 330-239~i 216.19 340-2390 585.40 001-2130 182.91 001-2390 92.31 165-2390 1.87 190-2390 19.07 192-2390 .05 193-2390 1.82 194-2390 .36 280-2390 .92 300-2390 .46 320-2390 3.72 330-2390 1.39 340-2390 8.65 210-165-739-5804 17,120.00 001-2175 1,013.51 001-2070 27,192.41 165-2070 525.80 190-2070 5,822.84 192-2070 17.66 193-2070 413.08 194-2070 132.69 280-2070 223.87 300-2070 91.19 320-2070 1,220.40 330-2070 324.27 340-2070 582.49 001-2070 6~323.66 165-2070 154.68 190-2070 1,541.68 192-2070 2.62 193-2070 111.73 194-2070 22.25 280-2070 66.72 300-2070 32.51 320-2070 288.64 35,874.19 17,120.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/27/01 /3:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER , FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK 2HECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER OATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 693198 U9/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 693198 09/27/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 693227 09/27/01 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 1NSTATAX (ROD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 693227 09/27/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 72108 09/27/01 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, 72109 09/27/01 004431 AMERICAN PAYROLL INSTIT 72110 09/27/01 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC 72111 99/27/01 ANDERSON, BEVERLY J. 72112 09/27/01 ANG, SAMUEL 72113 09/27/01 003203 72113 09/27/01 003203 72113 00/27/01 003203 72114 G9/27/01 004546 72115 09/27/01 002648 72115 09/27/01 002648 72116 09/27/01 002541 72117 09/27/01 004040 72118 09/27/01 72119 09/27/01 004225 72120 09/27/01 000154 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY AUNT KIZZYZ BOYZ AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV BIG FOOT GRAPHICS BRENNAN-MOOHE, BRIDGET BURL SLONE COUNTRY MUSI CSMFO OCT STORAGE RENTAL:UNIT BIO! YEAR END WRKSHP:11/7:JORGENSON MEMBERSHIP: JOHN R. MEYER,AICP REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSEUM REFUND:CITE 1215 OVERTURNED TCSD STAFF SHIRTS SIZES M/L/KL TCSD STAFF SHIRTS XXL SALES TAX ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NGTS 9/I4 MEMOERSHIP:PW MNTC CREW/INSPEC MEMBERSHIP:PW MNTC CREN/INSPEC CHANNEL REPAIRS:RANCHO VIST~ HALLOWEEN FLYER:RECREATION REFUND:MUSIC-YOUNG CHILDREN ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NGTS 9/14 ASST FINANCE DIRECTOR AD ACCOUNT NUMBER 330-20~i 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001~162 ~99-5234 001-140'999-5261 280-199-999-$226 190-183-4986 001-161-4255 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 280-199-999-5362 001-164-601-5214 001-163-~99-5214 001-164-601-5401 190-183-999-5370 190-183-4982 280-199-999-5362 001-150-999-5254 ITEM AMOUNT 81.63 150.03 92.35 4.81 137.97 2.80 1.21 4.12 8.12 2.42 7,360.01 127.83 1,302.92 5.65 101.44 41.56 49.35 22.01 269.29 80.25 131.76 130.00 324.00 332.00 36.00 50.00 668.75 66.00 55.11 400.00 162.00 108.00 2,870.00 150.00 31.00 50.00 160.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 45,322.85 9,745.87 130.00 324.00 332.00 36.00 50.00 789.86 400.00 270.00 2,870.00 150.00 31.00 50.00 160.00 VOUCHRE2 09/27/01 'i3:17 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER bATE NUMBER 72121 L~¥27/01 72121 09/27/01 72122 09/27/01 72123 09/27/01 72124 09/27/01 002534 72125 09/27/01 001249 72125 09/27/01 001249 72126 09/27/01 72127 72127 09/27/01 VENDOR NAME 001590 CALIF REDEVELOPMENT ASS 001590 CALIF REDEVELOPMENT ASS CAPRCBM CARTER-FAHIE, SANTANYA CATERERS CAFE CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV CHARETTE, DEBORA 000137 CHEVRON U S A 000137 CHEVRON U S A 1NC 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 G9/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 ~/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 72128 0~/27/01 003021 72128 09/27/01 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CIN6ULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL CINGULAR WIRELESS CELL ClNGULAR WIRELESS CELL 72129 ~9/27/01 CLEM, SANDRA CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCRER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AGENCY MEMBERSRIP DUES AGENCY MEMBERSHIP DUES MEMBERSHIP:PARKER/COMMISSIONS REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSEUM REFRESHMENTS:INTERVIEW PANEl MGMT ACADEMY:HAZEN & DALLREICH MGMT ACADEMY:HAZEN & BALLREICH REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CHILDRENS / FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PRONE SERVICE~ SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE: SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE! SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE~ SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES SEPT CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE! CREDIT:BILLING ERROR CREDIT:BILLING ERROR CREDIT:HILLING ERROR REFUMD:ARTS/CRAFTS-CHILDREN~ 72130 09/27/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CRARIT 004405 CHC 72130 09/27/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 72130 09/27/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 72130 09/27/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 72130 09/27/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CRARIT 004405 CHC 72130 09/27/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CRARIT 004405 CHC 72131 09/27/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 72132 09/27/01 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 72133 E9/27/01 COOPER, ESTELLA MUSEUM SECURITY SYS REPAIRS JUL GEOTECH SVCS:MNTC FAC MOD REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSEUM PAGE ACCOUNT ITEM CNECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 165-199-999-5226 280-199-999-5226 190-180-999-5226 190-183-4986 001-150-999-5260 001-161-999-5261 001-120-999-5261 190-182-4980 2,920.00 1,050.00 3,970.00 190.00 190.00 36.00 36.00 72.37 72.37 2,000.00 2,000.00 6.00 4,000.00 6.00 001-110-999-5262 43.89 001-170-999-5262 8.49 52.38 001-120-999-5208 132.47 001-140-999-5208 73.41 001-161-999-5208 486.60 001-162-999-5208 810.68 190-180-999-5208 1,090.36 280-199-999-5208 64.31 320-199-999-5208 290.70 001-163-999-5208 345.82 001-164-601-5208 305.24 001-164-602-5208 108.98 001-164-604-5208 61.52 001-165-999-5208 892.81 001-100-999-52D8 476.68 001-110-~99-5208 296.98 001-150-999-5208 58.68 330-199-999-5208 65.30 001-100-999-5208 4.99- 001-161-999-5208 4.99- 190-180-999-5208 4.99- 190-182-4980 3.00 5,545.57 3.00 001-2120 123.50 190-2120 5.60 193-2120 .60 194-2120 .20 330-2120 5.50 340-2120 .60 136.00 190-185-999-5212 65.00 65.00 210-190-158-5801 1,130.00 1,130.00 190-183-4986 36.00 36.00 VOUCHRE2 09/27/0~ ~3:17 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 72134 09/27/01 002954 DIAMOND GARAGE 72135 09/27/01 72136 09/27/01 72137 09/27/01 72138 09/27/01 72139 09/27/01 72139 d9/27/01 72139 09/27/01 72139 09/27/01 72139 09/27/01 72140 09/27/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION RES IMPR PRGM:LANATTE,ANTRONY DISASTER CONFERENCE BIO-CHEMICAL TRNG:PARAMEDIC 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK AUG SPECIAL EVENTS PREMIUMS 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEHP HELP N/E 09/07 MCCOY 000523 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER APPLICATION:INTERIM FIRE STN 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SPIDER BOX FOR TCSD MNTC 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SALES TAX 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP CRC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP CRC REPLACEMENT LAMPS 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SALES TAX 003665 EMERITUS COMMUNICATIONS 72141 09/27/01 EMETERIO, BARBARA 72142 09/27/01 003959 EVERETT & EVERETT PAINT 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE' 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72143 09/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 72144 09/27/01 72144 09/27/01 AUG LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVC~ REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS'CRILDRENJ RES IMPR HILLS PRGM:VEDRA,DENNIB JUL LDSCP IMPR:SADDLEWOOD JUL LDSCP IMPR:TEMEKU PK AUG LDSCP IMPR:RANCHO HIGHLAND AUG LDSCP IMPR:RANCHO HGHLDSI AUG LDSCP SVCS:PRESLEY AVE AUG LDSCP IMPR:PRESLEY AVE AUG LDSCP IMPR:VINEYARDS AUG LOSCP IMPR:VAIL RANCR AUG LDSCP IMPR:PAVILLION POINT AUG LDSCP IMPR:WOODCREST AUG LDSCP IMPR:VAIL RANCHO PKW 004464 EXXONMOBIL CARD SERVICE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 004464 EXXONMOBIL CARD SERVICE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 72145 0~/27/01 000478 FAST SIGNS 72145 09/27/01 000478 FAST SIGNS 72146 09/27/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 72146 0~/27/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 72146 09/27/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC WINDOW DECALS:POLICE STOREFRNT SALES TAX EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 72147 09/27/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-4117 HUGHES:PROF MTG 72148 0,9/27/01 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M FIRST AID CARE FOR EMPLOYEE 72148 09/27/01 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-199-813-5804 001-171-999-5261 300-2180 210-165-739-5804 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 320-199-999-5208 190-182-4980 165-199-813-5804 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 001-170-999-5262 001-165-999-5263 001-170-999-5229 001-170-9o9-5229 001-111-999-5230 001-163-999-5230 001-164~604-5260 001-150-999-5250 001-150-999-5250 72149 09/27/01 FUNES, MARTNA REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-0883 190-2900 ITEM AMOUNT 945.00 258.00 133.25 2,574.61 398.71 29.91 156.50 95.35 18.89 1,707.75 6.00 2,275.00 190.47 49.87 719.00 75.00 163.20 320.00 123.83 164.89 99.35 161.75 161.52 89.06 53.70 156.25 7.50 64.28 39.98 12.92 35.40 198.20 445.00 100.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 945.00 258.00 133,25 2,574.61 3,311.00 699.36 1,707.75 6.00 2,275.00 2,228.88 142.76 163.75 117.18 35.40 643.20 100.00 VOUCHRE2 09/27/01 i3:17 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER ~ATE NUMBER 72150 09/27/01 004243 72151 09/27/01 72152 09/27/01 72153 09/27/01 000520 72154 ~9/27/01 004053 72155 09/27/01 72156 09/27/01 001060 72157 d9/27/01 004217 72158 09/27/01 000194 72158 09/27/01 000194 72158 09/27/01 000194 72158 09/27/01 000194 72158 09/27/01 000194 72158 09/27/01 000194 72159 U9/27/01 002787 72159 39/27/01 002787 72159 09/27/01 002787 72160 09/27/01 001123 72161 ~9/27/01 001517 72162 09/27/01 001407 72163 09/27/01 72164 b9/27/01 72165 09/27/01 72166 09/27/01 004292 72166 09/27/01 004292 72167 00/27/01 72168 09/27/01 003631 72169 09/27/01 72170 09/27/01 001719 72171 09/27/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION GHERARDI, LUCIANO ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NGT 9/21 ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199~99-5362 GRACE TEMECULA VALLEY A REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-1368 190-2900 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS H D L COREN& CONE INC HABITAT WEST INC BOLT, JULIA . HYATT HYDRO TEK COMPANY I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS IDENTICATOR CORPORATION IDENTICATOR CORPORATION IDERTICATOR CORPORATION REFUND:CANCEL RENTAL 3 QTR TAX CONSULTING SVCS AUG/SEPT SVCB:PALA RD GRIDGI REFUND:EXERCISE-YOGA FOR TOOAY HTL 10/3-6:NRPA CONF:N.PARKER PRESSURE WASHER PARTS:PW MAI'NT 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMp 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP AD TOUGH SIGNATURE THUMBPRINT FREIGHT SALES TAX INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION MNTC SUPPLIES:PW MNTC CREWS INTEGRATED INSIGHTS DBA INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL IVES, VALERIE JESS, ANITA JONES, INGRID KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL KERR, NENDY KLEINFELDER INC KNIPPERS, KELLI L P A INC LANDES, VERONICA EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROM POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS REFUND:GYMNASTICS-TUMBLING TOT REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSEUM REFUND:DOG OBEDIENCE 190-187-4988 001-140-799-5248 210-165-631-5804 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5258 001-164-601-5215 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 001-170~999-5242 001-170-999-5242 001-170-999-5242 001-164-601-5218 001-150-999-5248 190-186-999-5250 190-183-4982 190-183-4986 190-183-4982 NALOWEEN SPOOKTACULAR SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 FREIGHT REFUND:EXERCISE-HATHA YOGA JUL GEOTECN SVCS:MARGARITA REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CHILDREN REIMBURSABLES:LISRARY DESIGN REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CNILDRENS 190-183-999-5370 190-183-4982 210-165-706-5804 190-182-4900 210-199-129-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 250.00 100.00 139.00 2,400.00 1,350.00 43.00 740.83 293.53 3,132.12 445.85 448.18 16.50 148.62 49.99 350.00 6.24 26.25 320.23 538.65 209.30 76.66 68.00 275.00 27.00 35.00 3,982.50 3.00 286.33 3.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 250.00 100.00 139.00 2,400.00 1,350.00 43.00 740.83 293.53 4,241.26 382.49 320.23 538.65 209.30 76.66 18.00 68.00 302.00 35.00 3~982.50 3.00 286.33 3.00 VOUCHER2 09/27/01 13:17 VOUCRER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 72172 C9/27/01 LAVIN, DINA 721}~3 09/27/01 MAGNER, LAWREN 72174 09/27/01 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 72175 09/27/01 003823 MASTERPIECE PAINTING CO 72176 09/27/01 MCDONALD, JONNA 72177 09/27/01 004617 MCLAUGBLIN ENGINEERING- 72178 0~/27/01 003427 MEYLER, JAMES A. 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72179 09/27/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 72180 09/27/01 MOLLOY, MARJORIE 72181 D9/27/01 004534 MOTIENT SERVICES 72182 09/27/01 NEAL, BARBARA 72183 09/27/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S 72184 09/27/01 004231 OLD TOWN JAZZ BAND 72185 09/27/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 72185 ~9/27/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 72185 09/27/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 72185 89/27/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 72185 09/27/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 72186 09/27/01 PADILLA, JULIE 72187 09/27/01 000359 PARKER, HERMAN 72188 09/27/01 001958 PERB LONG TERM CARE PRO 72189 09/27/01 004605 PERSONAL TOUCH CATERING 72190 09/27/01 000249 PETTY CASN CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND:YOUNG DISCOVERERS CLIB REFUND:TAKING CHARGE MISC SIGNS FOR PW MAINT CREWS RES IMPRV PRGM: SELL REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CARTOONING RET-ESCROW ACCT:PVMT MGMT:O030 REIMS:LEAGUE CONF:7/25-27/01 BUSINESS CARDS:POLICE DEPT BUSINESS CARDS:CBAPLAIN MOSSA SALES TAX LETTERNEAD/ENVELOPES:PW DEPT LETTERNEAD/ENVELOPES:PW DEPT LETTERNEAD/ENVELOPES:PW DEPT LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES:PW DEPT SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX SALES TAX REFUND:TAKING CSAR6E SEPT AIRTIME - SATELLITE PHONE REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CHILDREN PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES ENTERTAINMENT:SHE NIGNTS:9/21 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIN' CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & HAIN' CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIN' CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIh CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIN' REFUND:DANCE-COMBO REIMS:CALF LEAGUE:7/25-27/O' 001958 PERS L-T REFRESHMENTS:HIGH HOPES ANN PETTY CASH REINSURSENENT PAGE 6 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 190-183-4982 27.00 27.00 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00 001-164-601-5244 466.55 466.55 165-199-813-5804 2,500.00 2,500.00 190-183-4982 24.00 24.00 210-1035 15,013.09 15,013.09 190-180-999-5258 601.76 601.76 001-170-999-5222 636.00 001-170-999-5222 106.60 001-170-999-5222 55.69 001-163-999-5222 93.30 001-165-999-5222 93.30 001-164-602-5222 93.30 001-164-604-5222 93.30 001-163-999-5222 7.00 001-165-999-5222 7.00 001-164-602-5222 7.00 001-164-604-5222 6.99 1,199.48 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00 001-110-999-5278 69.00 69.00 190-182-4980 3.00 3.00 001-161-999-5220 21.60 21.60 280-199-999-5362 350.00 350.00 190-180-999-5214 257.62 001-164-601-5214 141.96 001-163-999-5214 69.95 001-165-999-5214 243.67 340-199-701-5214 150.79 863.99 190-183-4982 75.00 75.00 190-180"999-5258 3.75 3.75 001-2122 83.99 83.99 190-183-999-53~ 712.50 712.50 001-150-999-5265 36.30 VOUCHRE2 09/27/01 VOUCNER/ CHECK ~CBECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 72190 09/27/01 000249 PETTY CASH 72190 09/27/01 000249 PETTY CASH 72190 09/27/01 000249 PETTY CASR 72190 09/27/01 000249 PETTY CASB 72190 09/27/01 000249 PETTY CASH 72190 09/27/01 000249 PETTY CASH 72191 09/27/01 002185 72192 09/27/01 003493 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASB REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASN REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT POSTMASTER - TEMECULA POSTAGE FOR QTRLY COMM. NWS TR PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR RES IMPRV PRGM: GRUNAUER PAGE 7 ACCO~JNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 190-183-999-5320 48.23 190-183-999-5320 35.06 190-183-999-5350 12.14 001-171-999-5261 15.00 001-140-999-5262 29.61 001-140-999-5261 20.00 001-110-999-5230 1,979.95 165-199-813-5804 50.00 72193 09/27/01 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA JUL DSGN SVC:MURR.CREEK:PWO026 210-165-602-5802 5,553.54 72193 09/27/01 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA CREDIT:CONSULTANT OVERCBARGE 210-165-602-5802 10.54- 72194 09/27/01 001-140-999-5220 44.80 72194 09/27/01 001-140-999-5220 3.36 004453 R C ENTERPRISES SELF-INKING STAMP FINAN~ FOR E 004453 R C ENTERPRISES SALES TAX 72195 09/27/01 004318 R J BULLARD CONSTRUCTIO PRGS PMT#6:PALA RD SOUNDWAL 72195 U9/27/01 004318 R J BULLARD CONSTRUCTIO RET.W/H PMT#6:PALA RD SOUND~AL 72195 09/27/01 004318 R J BULLARD CONSTRUCTIO CRDT:PREV.BILLED AMT INCORRECT 72195 09/27/01 004318 R J DULLARD CONSTRUCTIO REVERSE RETENTION FOR CREDIi 72196 0~/27/01 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY PRGS PMT~3:JEFFERSON:PW99'l~m 210-165-656-5804 37,605.90 72196 0~/27/01 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY RET.W/H PMT#3:JEFFERSON:99-1=7 210-2035 3,760.59- m 72197 09/27/01 002176 RANCBO CALIF BUS PARK A OCT-DEC BUS.PK ASSOC DUES:DIaZ 001-164-604-5226 1,813.72 72197 09/27/01 002176 RANCBO CALIF BUS PARK A OCT-DEC BUS.PK ASSOC.DUES:C.:H. 340-199-701-5226 1,319.07 72198 09/27/01 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST APP. FEE:INTERIM FIRE STATION 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 210-165-631-5804 10,270.69 210-2035 513.53- 210-165-631-5804 8,571.03- 210-2035- 428.55 210-165-739-5804 4,243.00 190-180-999-5240 2,168.67 193-180-999-5240 I0~985.07 72199 09/27/01 72199 09/27/01 72200 09/27/01 RASCON, JENNIFER REFUND:YOUNG DISCOVERERS CLUB 190-183-4982 83.00 72201 5o/27/01 REID, DONNA REFUND:BALLOON TWISTING FOR KD 190-183-4982 10.00 72202 09/27/01 72202 09/27/01 72202 09/27/01 001-164-601-5238 225.76 001-164-601-5238 41.90 001-164-601-5238 80.92 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR PW 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR PW 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR PW 72203 09/27/01 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR JUL PARKING CITATION ASSESSMNT 001-2260 707.00 72203 09/27/01 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR JUL PARKING CITATION ASSESSM~T 001-2265 490.00 72204 ;~/27/01 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE AUG RECORDINGS/COPIES:RDA/PW 165-199-999-5250 33.00 72204 ~/27/01 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE AUG RECORDINGS/COPIES:RDA/PW 001-163-o~9-5250 3.00 72205 0c/~7/01 000418 RIVERSIDE 00 CLERK & RE LIEN RELEASE WEED AGATEMNT FEE 001-120-999-5250 10.00 000411 RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD COMT MAY/JUNE PROF SVCS:VIA MONTEZU 001-2030 675.13 72206 09/27/01 196.34 1,979.95 50.00 5,543.00 48.16 1,614.68 33,845.31 3,132.79 4,243.00 13,153.74 83.00 10.00 348.58 1,197.00 36.00 10.00 675.13 VOUCHRE2 09/27/01 !3:17 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 72207 0~/27/01 72207 09/27/01 72208 09/27/01 72209 09/27/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO TECHN 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO TECNN ROCCO, ANTHONY RUSSELL, MARLENA CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION JUL EMERG. RADIO RENTAL:P.D AUG EMERG. RADIO RENTAL:P.D REFUND:DOG OBEDIENCE PAGE 8 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 001-170-999-5238 282.75 001-170-999-5238 282.75 565.50 190-183-4982 68.00 68.00 REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSEUM 190-183'4986 36.00 36.00 72210 09/27/01 SALMI, MAUREEN REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSE 72211 09/27/01 72212 09/27/01 72212 09/27/01 004528 SAN DIEU0 BANJO BAND 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE ENTERTAINMENT:SMB NIGHTS:9/ ADVERTISING:BMR NIGHTS:7/26 ADVERTISING:BMR NIGHTS:7/12 72213 09/27/01 SCATLIFFE, MARIAN REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CHILDREN 72214 09/27/01 SIMICH, SILVANA REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CHILDREN 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 0~/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 ~/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 72215 09/27/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON SEP 2-21-518-0340 HNY 79 SEP 2-11-007-0455 6TH ST. JUL 2-22-891-0550 VARIOUS MTRS JUL 2-22-891-0550 VARIOUS MTRS SEP 2-10-747-1393 VARIOUS MTRS SEP 2-14-204-1615 FRNT BT RDIO SEP 2-18-937-3152 MUSEUM SEP 2-22-496-3439 VARIOUS MTRS SEP 2-21-981-4720 HWY 79 SEP 2-02-351-4946 BR CTR SEP 2-21-560-5874 MARGARITA SEP 2-18-049-6416 FRONT BT lEO SEP 2-21'911'7892 S.BIDE PK LT BEP 2-19-171-8568 WED.CHAPEl SEP 2-22-934-9634 DIAZ LS3 SEP 2-22-934-9766 DIAZ 72216 09/27/01 000519 SODTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 72216 09/27/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 72216 0~/27/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 72216 09/27/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 72217 09/27/01 004163 SPORTS CHALET 72218 09/27/01 000574 SUPERTONER 72218 09/27/01 000574 SUPERTONER WED.CHAPEL PEST CONTROL SVCS TCC PEST CONTROL SVCS MUSEUM PEST CONTROL SVCS SR CTR PEST CONTROL SVCS POLICE BICYCLE REPAIR & MAUT. HP PRINTER MAINTENANCE SVC HP PRINTER SUPPLIES 72219 09/27/01 004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION 72219 09/27/01 004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION 72219 09/27/01 004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION PRGS PMT#5:MAINT FAC MODS:O016 STOP NTC:MAINT FAC:STEEL TECH 72220 09/27/01 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P SENIOR CENTER PLUMBING SEBV] 190-183-4986 36.00 36.00 280-199-999-5362 250.00 250.00 280-199-999-5362 315.00 280-199-999-5362 315.00 190-182-4980 3.00 190-182-4980 3.00 190-180-999-5319 48.11 001-164-603-5240 488.14 193-180-999-5240 2,736.12 190-100-999-5240 260.51 190-1B0-999-5240 28.31 340-199-701-5240 24.09 190-185-999-5240 1,009.83 190-180-999-5319 117.57 001-165-999-5250 79.46 190-181-999-5240 921.02 190-180-999-5319 63.41 001-164-603-5319 210.30 001-164-603-5240 174.25 190-185-999-5240 108.86 190-180-999-5319 56.54 190-180-999-5319 50.74 190-185~999-5250 32.00 190-184-999-5250 36.00 190-185-999-5250 42.00 190-181-999-5250 29.00 001-170-999-5215 132.20 630.00 3.00 3.00 6,377.26 139.00 132.20 320-199-999-5215 279.50 320-199-999-5221 1,228.73 1,508.23 210-190-158-5804 141,172.86 210-2035 14,117.29- 210-2038 5,600.00- CE 190-181-999-5212 65.00 121,455.57 65.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMEOULA 09/27/01 15:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCBER/ j CHECK 'CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 72221 09/27/01 001022 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO 72222 09/27/01 THORSEN, DEBORAH 72223 09/27/01 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE 72224 09/27/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G FAIR LABOR STANDARDS HANDBOOKS REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSEUM PW MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 .09/27/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S E M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S C M ~4EST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMp) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S C M [~EST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72225 09/27/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 72226 09/27/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 72226 09/27/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 72226 09/27/01 000389 U S C M WEST (ORRA) 000389 PT RETIE 72226 09/27/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OMRA) 000389 PT RETIE 72226 09/27/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 72226 09/27/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 72226 09/27/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 72226 09/27/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 72227 D9/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 03/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 ~9/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 09/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 0~/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 09/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 09/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 09/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 09/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 03/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 09/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 09/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72227 09/27/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 72228 0~/27/01 000325 UNITED ~AY 000325 UW 72228 09/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 72228 09/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UN 72228 09/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 72228 09/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 72228 09/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 72228 09/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 72228 09/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UN 72228 09/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW PAGE 9 ACCOdNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 001-150-999-5228 411.50 411.50 190-183-4986 18.00 18.00 001-164-601-5218 780.99 780.99 190-183-999-5330 264.00 264.00 001-2080 9,299.97 165-2080 126.16 190-2080 1,925.14 192-2080 2.51 193-2080 98.71 194-2080 29.49 280-2080 126.16 300-2080 88.54 320-2080 1,416.68 340-2080 169.43 001-2160 819.64 165-2160 100.14 190-2160 1,229.98 193-2160 23.38 280-2160 30.08 320-2160 34.38 330-2160 67.64 340-2160 20.06 001-110-999-5230 49.25 001-111-999-5230 68.93 001-120-999-5230 156.62 001-140-999-5230 437.19 001-150-999-5230 141.79 001-161-999-5230 948.89 001-162-999-5230 65.36 001-164-604-5230 408.74 001-170-999-5230 1.70 001-171-999-5230 8.12 190-185-999-5230 340.00 190-180-999-5230 741.26 280-199-999-5230 33.43 001-2120 127.05 165-2120 8.75 190-2120 22.60 192-2120 .10 193-2120 2.21 194-2120 .49 280-2120 2.50 320-2120 5.00 330-2120 5.00 13,282.79 2,325.30 3,401.28 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/27/01 13:17 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 72228 G9/27/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 U~ 7222909/27/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA SEP XXX-O074 GENERAL USAGE 72229 0~/27/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA SEP XXX-3564 ALARM 72230 09/27/01 004200 VERIZON WIRELESS LLC RENTAL EQUIPMENT: STONE 72231 09/27/01 WILLIAMS, PATR[CIA REFUND:DOG OBEDIENCE 72232 09/27/01 WOOD, NOBMA REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSEUM 7223309/27/01 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL! JUL BASE CHARGE:5830 COPIER 7223472233 09/27/010R/27/01 000345 YORKE,XEROX CORPORATIONJANET BILLI AUGREiMB:LEAGuEBASE CHARGE:5830CONF:7/25.27/o1COPIER 72235 09/27/01 ZOTES, GLADYS REFUND:EXCURSION-GETTY MUSEUM PAGE 10 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 340-2120 .60 174.30 320-1Q9-999-5208 222.34 320'199-999-5208 48.25 270.59 001-1990 45.22 45.22 190~183-4982 68.00 68.00 190'183'4986 18.00 18.00 330-199-999'5217 80.30 330-19Q-999-5217 80.30 160.60 190~180'999'5258 95.88 95.88 190-183-4986 18.00 18.00 TOTAL CHECKS 747,148.22 VOUC~RE2 09/27/01 13:45 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 204,088.73 165 aDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 3,208.50 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 645.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 1,274,842.02 261 CFD 88'12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 544.90 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ' DIP 2,641.58 300 INSURANCE FUND 20,552.57 TOTAL 1,506,523.30 PAGE 2 VOUCRRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/27/01 13:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 72238 10/09/01 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OFf TRE V 72239 10/09/01 004580 CALIFORNIA COMMERiCIAL P 72239 10/09/01 004580 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL P AUGUST ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES AUG PRGSS:CNAPARRAL SWIM POOL RETENTION:AUG PRGSS CHAPARRAL 72240 10/09/01 004571 CUNNINGHAM DAVIS CORP 72240 10/09/01 004571 CUNNINGHAM DAVIS CORP AUG CITYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS RETENTION:AUG A.C.REPAIRS PAGE 1 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 001-172-999-5255 8,656.88 8,656.88 210-190-170-5804 142,143.14 210-2035 14,214.32- 001-164-601-5402 79,072.93 001-2035 7,907.29- 72241 10/09/01 004569 DAVID TAUSSIG & A~SOCIA TAX CONSULTART:BUTTERFIELD CFD 001-2600 AUGUST PLAN CHECK SERVICES WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK SVCS 72242 10/09/01 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION 72243 30/09/01 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES 72243 10/09/01 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATE,S 72244 I~/09/01 004051 L 0 R GEOTECNNICAL GROU GEOTECN SVCS:JEFFERSON PW99'17 72245 !0/09/01 003800 MCLAUGNLIR ENGINEERING 72245 10/09/01 003800 MCLAUGNLIR ENGINEERING 72246 10/09/01 004617 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING- 72247 10/09/01 002256 P & D CONSULTANTS INC 72248 10/09/01 003218 PELA 15,477.72 72249 10/09/01 004287 QUICK SET PRINTING 72249 10/09/01 004287 QUICK SET PRINTING 001'162-999'5248 16,678.98 72250 10/09/01 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY) 72250 10/09/01 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY 72250 10/09/01 004457 R J NOBLE COMPARYi 72250 10/09/01 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY~ 001-1182 33.63' 001-163-999-5248 6,725.00 210-165-656-5804 5,670.00 72251 !0/09/01 72251 10/09/01 72251 10/09/01 72251 10/09/01 72251 !0/09/01 72251 !0/09/01 72251 ~0/09/01 72251 10/09/01 72251 10/09/01 PRGS PMT#2:PVMNT MGMT:PWO0-310 210-165~655-5804 924,959.76 RET.W/H PMT#2:P~q4NT MGMT:00-~O 210-2035 92,495.98- RET.ESCROW ACCT:PVMT MGMT:O030 m AUG TEMP BLDG INSPECTOR SVC~ m AUG PLANNING PLAN CNECK SVCS CITY QTRLY COMMUNITY NEWSLTRS TAX ON PRINTING OF NEWSLETTERS PRGS PMT#4:JEFFERSON:PW99-1~ RET.W/N PMT#4:JEFFERSON:99-1~ PRGS PMT#4:MARG IMPRV:PW99-Oi1 RET.W/N PMT#4:MARG IMPRV:99-01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 002412 RICHARDS WATSON &iGERSN AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 002412 RICHARDS WATSON &)GERSH AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 002412 RICNARDS WATSON & GERSN AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 002412 RICNARDS WATSON &)GERSH AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 002412 RICHARDS WATSON &i GERSH AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 002412 RICHARDS WATSON &[ GERSH AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 002412 RICHARDS WATSON &= GERSH AUG 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 72252 10~'09/01 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL AUG DSGR SVCS:R.C.BRIDGE:99- TOTAL CHECKS 210-1035 92,495.98 001-162-999-5118 10,520.64 001-161-999-5250 8,855.00 001-110-999-5222 6,363.42 001-110-999-5222 477.26 210-165-656-5804 8,429.21 210-2035 842.92- 210-165-706-5804 198,067.11 210-2035 19,806.71- 001-130-999-5246 43,778.85 165-199-999-5246 3,208.50 190-180-999-5246 645.00 300-199-999-5246 20~552.57 280-199-999-5246 2,641.58 261-199-999-5246 544.90 001-2643 5,586.74 001-2642 9,836.23 210-1990~ 3,299.42 18 210-165-710-5802 27,137.33 127,928.82 71,165.64 15,477.72 16,678.98 6,691.37 5,670.00 832,463.78 92,495.98 10,520.64 8,855.00 6,840.68 185,846.69 90,093.79 27,137.33 1,506,523.30 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIN~ANCE~ CITY MANAGER ~/ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance October 09, 2001 City Treasurer's Report as of Augu Genie Roberts, Director of Finance Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: of August 31, 2001. That the City Council receiv, DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regar¢ 31,2001 and file the City Treasurer's Report as the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report which provides thru information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections §360'1 and §363§ as of August 31, 2001. FISCAl IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 2001 ~.~_ :~,: :.:~ City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of August 31, 2001 Cash Activi~ for the Month of August: Cash and Investments as of August 1, 2001 Cash Receipt~ Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of August 31,200t Cash and Investments Portfolio: Ty~e o1 Investment Petty cash General Checking Sweep Account (Money Market Account) Banef'd Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Certificate of Deposit (Retention Escrow) Various (Retention Escrow) Checking Account (Parldng Citations) Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 (Money Market Account) Rese~e Account- CFD 88-12 (Investment Agreement) Delinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFD 88-12 (Investment Agreement) Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1 (Money Market Account) Reserve Account- CFD 98-1 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Trust Account~-TCSD COPs (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-TCSD COPs (Investment Agreement) Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-RDA Bonds (Investment Agreement) Institution Yield City Hall n/a Unk~n Bank Wa Union Bani( 2.640 (Highmark U.S. Treasury) Union Bank n/a State Treasurer 4.502 Community Bank 3.300 U.S. Bank Various Union Bank n/a U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 3.300 CDC Funding Cerp 5.430 CDC Funding Cerp 5.422 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 3.300 State Treasurer 4.502 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 3.300 Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 3.300 Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. (2)-At August 31, 2001 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Lccal Agency Inv The City's proportionate share of that varue is $56,041,395. investments are liquid and currently available. 64,978,520 5,491,158 (7,610,586) 62,859,092 The City of Temecula's po~/olio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual exl~enditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months. stment Fund (I. All=) was $48,729,659,672. $ 1,500 $ 1,500 (3,413,344) (3,413,344) (1) 2,835,000 2,835,CX:}0 401 401 (1) 55,916,281 55,916,281 (2) 249,044 249,044 278,405 278,405 2,979 2,979 1,297,896 1,297,896 9/1/2017 1,531,469 1,531,469 9/1/2017 500,000 500,000 797,500 797,500 910,000 910,000 292 292 10/1/2012 502,690 502,690 59 59 2/1/2013 1 ~448,920 1 ~448~920 $ 62,859,092 Maturity/ Contractual/ Termlnation Market Par/Book Date Value Balance ITEM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FI.~t~CE ?ITY MANAGER,S,'' /(~'/~' CITY OF TEMECULAI AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Anthony Elmo-Director of Building and Safe~ October 9, 2001 First Amendment to Professional Contract for Building Inspection Staff RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a First Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with P & D Consultants amending Exhibit B, the houdy compensation rate schedule, h BACKGROUND: The Building and Safety Department as utilized the services of P & D Consultants to supplement its building inspection staff for ~pproximately two and one half (2 %) years. Inspection staff provided by P & D Consu tants has been well qualified and professional. P & D Consultants has found it necessary to modifytheir initial ~ ' hourly compensation rate schedule due to the varying experience needs of inspection staff. The original agreement identified a payment schedule based on limited experience levels. The one fee compensation schedule (Exhibit B) in the existing contract, has limited our ability to obtain the services of more qualified inspection staff to supplement our regular senior staffwith, on the more time ~ntensive, complex projects such as the mall. Today the inspection requirements demand a larger scope of work and h gher evel of e per ence and n some cases h gh y spec a zed nspector expenence is needed for commerc a and industrial construction. To obtain this talent it is necessary to revise the current payment rate schedule with P & D Consultants. The new rate schedul~ will provide two additional levels of inspection service to the City. t To this end, the proposed schedule will designate compensa ion levels for inspection staff from entry level to highly experienced level. Staff has surveyedlother firms and found that the rates proposed in this amendment are reasonable and in line with hourly compensation rates charged by other firms offering similar services. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are currently available in Accoun! No. 001-162-999-5118, "Temporary Help', for th's purpose. The total contract amount will not change with this contract amendment. Expenditures from this account are offset by building permit revenue collection. No further appropriation of funds will be necessary for this purpose. FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND P&D CONSULTANTS THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of October 09, 2001 by and · ~ ("City" between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation and P&D Consultants (A Gonsultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenant parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the A. On July 10, 2001 the City and Consul' and conditions set forth herein, the following facts and purposes: ant entered into that certain agreement entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services" ("Agreement"). 2. Exhibit B to the Agreement is hereby deleted{ from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit B is added to the Agreement as set forth on ~ttachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as thought ~et forth in full. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth h, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect· :rein, all other terms and conditions of R:IBROCKMEJMGMTSIAMENDMNT ISTP&D 200I.DOC i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Jeffery Comerchero, ATTEST: BY: Susan Approved As t, BY: Mayor it. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTAN~ BY: NAME: Steve Ltterson, Associate VP RABROCKMEIMGMTSL4MENDMNT IST P&D 2001.DOC 2 Revision of Exhibit B to Agreement Attachment A PAYMENT SCHEDULI For and in consideration of the Contractor's services, ins~ :ction services shall be provided in accordance with the following rates: Level 1 - Entry level Inspector (Residential Only) $45.00 per hour - Definition: Zero to one-year municipal experience, one to five construction experience. / 2 ~Mid Level Ins ector resid .... Level - p ( ent~al and medium commercial/tenant improvement) $50.00 per hour - Definition: More than one-year municipal expqrience. Five to ten years con. struction experience. I. Level 3 - Semor Level Inspector (Residential, Commercial, Industrial) $60.00 per hour Definition: More than five-years municipal ex] ~erience. More than ten-years construction experience. Mileage charge will be $.30 per mile for each mile accumt lated while performing inspection services for the City. . . I . Should the C~ty provide vehmular transportation for contractor's use, no fees shall be charged for mileage. ITEM 6 AP PROVA~/z~, .~~'~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR ~_~:~ CI~TY MANAGER ~v~)~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services/~/ October 9, 2001 Approval of the Urban Recreal and Facilities for Wildlife Ed Program Grant Application Temecula Children's Museum ional and Cultural Centers, Museums, Jcation or Environmental Education Or the Imagination Workshop, the PREPARED BY: D t D ' Phyllis L. Ruse, epu y irector of CommunityServces RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR I GRANT FUNDS FOR URBAN RECREATIONAL AND CULTURAL CENTERS, MUSEUMS, AND FACILITIES FOR WILDLIFE EDUCATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 BACKGROUND: The Safe Neighborhood Parks Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (2000 Park Bond Act) was passed by the state constituents in March 2000. The Act provides for several competitive and non-competitive grant funding sources under several different categories. One competitive category of funding is for the Urban Recreational and Cu tura Centers (URCC) Centers). Unlike the other funding opportunities under the 2000 Park Bond Act, this particular grant requires the nomination of the project by a state legislator. adopted a Resolution authorizing staff to seek a legislative Imagination Workshop, the Temecula Children's Museum. On April 24, 2001, the City Council )omination for a URCC grant for the The project was nominated by Assemblyman Hollingswor application packet from the California Department of Parks completed application must be submitted by November 1, applications and submit a prioritized list of all projects to the State Legislature for approval R:\RUSEP~AG~NDAS\children's museum urcc application reso.doc h and staff has received the grant and Recreation (Department). The 301. The Department will review all prior to April 1,2002. Appropriations for the grants funds are expec :ed to be included in the 2002/2003 State Budget, and available to the successful projects at that time. Grant funds ma on be used fordesi n fabncabo , I Y Y g , ' ' n ano installation that occurs after the funding becomes available. It is anticipated that the first phase of the Imagination Workshop will be completed by spring 2002. However, funding for the se~ond~ phase of the project is, as yet, unspecified. The design for the second phase will be completed as part of the overall planning and design for the facility; it is anticipated that URRC grant wouldlprovide funding for the second phase exhibits fabrication and installation. Upon approval of this itom, staff will finalize preparation of the grant application and submit it to the California Department bf Parks and Recreation. Th UR I FISCAL IMPACT: e CC Grant application for the Imagination Workshop is for an amount of $300,000. If successful, these funds will provide for the fabrication and installation of the second phase exhibits for the Imagination Workshop, the Ter~ecula Children's Museum. Design for these exhibits will be completed as pad of phase one of the project. R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS\children's museum urcc application reso,doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR URBAN RECREATIONAL AND CULTURAL CENTERS, MUSEUMS, AND FACILITIES FOR WILDLIFE EDUCATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 For the Imagination Workshop, the Temecula Children's Museum THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: / Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine and declare that: ! a. The people of the State of California have enacted the Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers, Museum, and F~cilities for Wildlife Education or Environmental Education Program which provides funds to the State of California for Grants to cities, counties, nonprofit organizations and federally recognized California Indian Tribes. a b. The California Department of P rks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the Program within the state and grant Project shown above, setting up necessary procedures. c Said rocedures t bi' ' ' aP~;kroSCa~dofRt~eCrae~'t~icnart~oqnU~!ftohree sAuPbPr~.sa~ni~i !i~!i~nianbip.B.t~a~tiYotCn°i~e~i!~aSbt~ie~sa°r~u~t t h°ef for the Project. Section 2. District: The Applicant will enter into a Co ~tract with the State of California That the Board of Directors of th Temecula Community Services a. Approves the filing of an appli¢ ~tion for local assistance funds from the Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers Museum, and Facilities for Wildlife Education or Environmental EducationI Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. b. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the Project. ~ c. Certifies that the Applicant ha~ reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the Contract show in the Procedural Guide. d. Appoints the City Manaqer as gent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned Project. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certif to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of ,2000. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopte of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the I the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Jeffrey Stone, President California, do hereby certify that by the City Council of the City day of ., 2001 by ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ITEM CiTY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: ~l, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Supl DATE:[Joctober 9, 2001 SUBJECT: Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE_,~;~__ CITY MANAGER ,rt Services Prepared by: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator RECOMMENDATION: 1. Award a contract for Pentium based computer workstations to Tech 101 - Arcus, Inc. of Irvine, California in the amount of $44,618.25. 2. Appropriate $5,500 from Development Impact Fees - Corporate Facilities. BACKGROUND: 1. The City recently completed a Request for Propos~ (RFP) for the purpose to select a qualified vendor to purchase thirty (30) Pentium based computer workstations. These new systems are necessary for the workstations being ~reated in the Maintenance Facility expansion currently under construction. A total of ten (10) proposals were received and reviewed. The proposals ranged from a Iow of $39,054.75 from Think! Computer Products of Irvine, California to a high of $55,792.50. Forty-seven RFP packets were mailed (eleven to local Temecula vendors), of which the following ten (10) vendors responded. Vendor Unit Price Total Quote Think! Computer Products, Irvine CA Tech 101 -Arcus, Inc., Irvine CA Golden State Trading Co., Brea CA Jaguar Systems, Inc., Riverside CA Computer Masters, San Diego CA Sys Technology, Inc., Cypress CA LPS Computer Service Group, Inc., Escondido CA CempuSource, Carlsbad CA Sterling Computers, Lomita CA LAN Solutions LLC, San Diego CA $1,301.83 $39,054.75 $1,487.28 $44,618.25 $1,531.88 $45,956.25 $1,538.33 $46,149.75 $1,602.83 $48,084.75 $1,644.38 $49,331.25 $1,649.78 $49,493.25 $1,682.15 $50,464.50 $1,760.85 $52,825.50 $1,859.75 $55,792.50 2. On September 11,2001, City Council awarded a oont 'act to Think! Computer Products as the lowest qualified bidder. Think! Computer Product~ has withdrawn their bid, unable to supply the equipment at the previously proposed pric~. Agenda Reports\PC Workstations -~ ~; . 3. Tech 101 - Arcus, Inc., of Irvine, California submitted the next lowest qualified quote, meeting all the technical specifications of the RFP, and has confirmed that they are ready to honor their bid price of $44,618.25. 4. These systems were specified with ViewSonic ViewPane s instead of a traditional CRT monitor, due to the s~gnff~cant decrease ~n the cost of these monitors over the past year. Current pricing, confirmed by the lowest bid, shows an! approximate $50 difference between the traditional CRT monitor and the flat panels. Th~ benefits of these panels are many; ergonomic issues affecting City employees, both from the aspect of moving and installing equipment to I~m~ted-space workstation ~ssues and the angle at which employees must use their computers; s~gnd~cantly reduced energy consumption; and a life of ten years, instead of three years. D I t FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in eve opmen Facilities to fund the additional $5,500 appropriation. Attachment: Request for Proposal Price Sheet- Tech 101 Confirmation letter dated 10/1/01 - Tech 101 Equipment Purchase Agreement Withdrawal letter from Think! Computer Agenda Reports\PC Workstations Impact Fees Corporate - Arcus, Inc. - Arcus, Inc. PART I:; Oty 30 :CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST FOR, PR~)POS.Z · . ' PRICING- SHEET EQUIPMENTSPECIFICATIONS.',-~ · ~:"~, .: L Description . Unit PriCe Personal Computer Wodmtation . . -'ATX Mid-Tower caSe wZ300W/UL p8/'2 power SUpplF (Must comply with Prat 15 of FCC Rules) - Intel D815EEA2 Mothefooard w/Intel integrated graphk~; Audio and LAN 10/100 connectivity :'- · - Intel 1000MHz Pentiufn III Pmcassor ~ ...: .:. :, · - 128MB PC133 SDRAM, lx128 ' - 40GB Hard Drive, 7200 rpm (Minimum) - TeaS 1.44MB, 3.5- Roppy Drive - 50X.CD-ROM, ATAPI Ddve - 250MB Iomega Zip !ntemal ATAPI Ddve - Microsoft Natural Keybomd Er~te . - Logitech two button Wheel Mouse (Optical) - Amplitied 2 piece Multimedia Speaker system - Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional - APC Back-UPS 500 (500 VA) UPS $897 Extended Price / ViewSon~c vjewPanel 15' VG150 $44n Three (3) year an-~tie warranty, for labor, parts and technical I Support with minimum eight ~8) hour response time (Monday $50 Through Fgday 8am - 5pm. $26;910 $13,200 $1,500 EXHIBIT A PART Il: PRICING ~EM I TOTAL Equipment per specifications (PART I) Deliver Cha~. es Sales Tax (Temecula 7.5%) Other Costs (Please Identify) Cost of the Three(3) year c~-site warranty TOTAL PRICE $3,008.25 $1,500 Vendor Name:. Tech 101 - Arcus, Inc.. .Contact: Gregory L. Horn City/St,~p: Address: 16812 Millikan Ave. Phone. 949-261~-5141 Ext. 249 .Fa~c. '949-62_2-6649 5 :[],vine, CA 92606 Tax ID: 33-0743256 - Date: 08/14/01 o' EXHIBIT B STATEMEN;~)F, ;Q UALIFICA rlONS . , Attach a statement of qualificat!onsoutlining vendor'= = corporate profile and experience in . providing (inse~t requirement) requ red by th s RFP. Attach a list of client references, to'include the followi ~g information for each reference: Reference .-Company Nam e. Point of Contact Company 'Street Address f City, Slate, Zip Code I t Telephone: Number _ . ... Attach a statement of warranty for all work to be provided. / Attach a copy of all City, County, Federal and State i;enses required, as applicable. Attach a copy'of resumes or licenses/permits for all ersonnel in your shop Who will be ' (insert requirement). Selected Vendor will provide the following documentation upon execution of the contract: Certificate of Insurance for: Workers Compensation, G Excess/Umbrella Liability, and Personal Property Dam~ occurrence. ' · Early Pay Discount: A 1 % discount is offered for payment within 15 (Note: No less than 15 days will be considered for purl By signing this RFP, Vendor has read and will comply witl Signature Name'S'n( 6 eneral Liability, Automobile Uabili~, [ge in the amount of $1,000,o00.Per days. )cae of bid evaluation). all terms and conditions herein. of Authorized Representative L. Horn, Account Executive TECH 101-ARCUS1 INC. 16812 Millikan Ave., Irvtne, CA 92606 Tel: 949~261-5141 Ext. 249 Fax: 949-622-6649 greg~tecblOl.com To: Mr. Tom I-Iafel~ Fax: 909-694-6498 From: Grcg Horn Date: 10/1/0! Re: Pag~s: CC: [] Urgenl wi For Review [] Please Commem Mr, Hafeli: Here is confirmation that Tech 101 can and $44,618.25 submitted for the "PC WORKST~ August 28, 2001. The following pages are our original submi~ Performa invoice. We are prepared to deliver said systems wiU days of receipt of your Purchase Order. Thank you, Sr, 5ales Executive ~ill honor our price of kT~ON RFP" award dated ~on for said RFQ and our tin seven (7) business Telephone 949/261-51&1 SALES OROER Sold To: CITY OF TEMECULA ~]200 BUSINESS PARK TEMECULA~ ¢-A 92590 Sh~p TO; CITY OF TEMECULA 63200 8U$1NESS PARK TEMECULA~ CA 92~90 Phone: SO Date Ship Via F-O.B. Terrr~ 10/01/0~ DEL[VER~O Origin ~ET ]0 DAYS Po Number Req Date Salesperaan Aef Num. OrdOtyJShpQ~YlJtem IDescription ] Pricel Ext. Price 30 ~ T£C128/PCl]~/OE 128 MB PCl~ OIMN 16X64 OE~ O.OO $ 0.00 30 ~ TEAZ~SHF] TEAC I.~MB (IVORY) FD~ 0.00 S O,OO 30 SO~5~XCDRO#/IOE SONY 52X CD-ROM [DE 0.~ S O.OO 30 TECC~THD~ IDE ~BLE UlTH ~ C~NECTOR$ 0.00 H 0.00 $0 ~ I~ZIP/INT250 I~EU ZIP RTAPI ZS~ DRIVE 0.~ S 0.00 Page I No~Texab[a ~ubtotal 1500.00 Texabte subtotal 40110.00 CITY OF TEMECULA PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") is made and ~ ntered into as of September 11, 2001, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Tech 101 - Arcus, Inc., ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, th~ parties agree as follows: 1 Purchase and "ale fE . I ..... · ~ o quipment. On aha subject to tl~e terms ana conoitions set Iorth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to manufacture, sell and deliver to the City, Personal Computer Workstations as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Request for Proposal/Pricing Sheet, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment' ). 2. Purchase Pric~e. The Purchase price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment and service is Forty-four thousand six hundred, eighteen Dollars and tw~nty-five Cents ($44,618.25). The Purchase price is final and shall be paid by C~ty to Vendor tn accordance with the following schedule: Net 30. / 3. Representations and Warranties of Vendor! Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, dehvery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been d~ly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment manufactured and ~nstalled. All of the Eqmpment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free a d clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, eqmtles, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or g!anted by City. All of the Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descrrpt~ons, representations and warranties set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware the City is purchasing the Equipment for use as Computer Workstations on the City's Wide Area Network consisting of both Microsoft NT and Novell Servers and that City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. t c. Full Disclosure. None of the represen ations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contain or will contain any untrue statement ~f a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the~ circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 4. Performance. Vendor shall at all times faitl ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Vendor si fully, competently and to the best of his or her tall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. Cit~ Approval. All labor, materials, tools, e~uipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement I~ notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 6. Time of Delivery. The date and time before Friday, October 19, 2001 with weekly delivery of at least ten (10) ~ use of the Equipment by City. If, in the ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or ystems per week through November 2, 2001. / 7. Place of Delivery. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 8. Rejection. In the event of such notice ol non-conformity by City pursuant to Section 5, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The ~xercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies o~City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonabl{ instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9 NoR I ts f [ · ep acemen o Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that the Equipment tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of th~ whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may, but is not required to accept any substi[ute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. lndenmification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officmls, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all clmms, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, en incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons the Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability 11. Contract Documents. ployees, agents or volunteers may sustain or or damage to property arising out of or from rising out of the sole negligence of the City. a. This Agreement includes the follow~ tg documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: ( 1 ) Vendors response to the Request for Proposal dated August 1, 2001, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) Request· for Proposal dated August 14, 2001, attached hereto as Exhibit B. b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of th s Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the RFP and/or the e dor s response to the RFP, th~s Agreement shall prevad over the RFP and the Vendor s Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over the Vendor's R~sponse to the RFP. 2 12. Default of Vendor. The Vendor s failure to comply with the pro[~s~ons of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event the Vendor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Vendor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's ~ontrol, and without fault or negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines the Vendor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Vendor with written notice of the default. The Vendor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the Vendor fails to cure its default within suchlPeriod of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equit~ or under this Agreement. 13. Survival of Representations and Warrantiel. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive th~ execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. 14. Legal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall k~ep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in ahy way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and con'ply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity o~casioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. N m 15. PROHIBITED INTEREST. o ember, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the c~ntract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of ail such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if suCh interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 ~ourmencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 16. Independent Contractor. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. T,he personnel performing the services under this ~greement on behalf of the Vendor shall at all times be under the Vendor s exclusive direction and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of the Vendor or any of the Vendor's officers, employees, agents or volunteers except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall not at any tinge or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner, officers, employees or ~tgents of the City of Temecula. Vendor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability what~ver against the City, or bind the City in any 17 Assignment. The Vendor shall not assign the l thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of tt 18. Notices. Any notices which either party may Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal se ,erformance of this Agreement, nor any part City. tesire to give to the other party under this vice, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides alreceipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, retr of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may I~ To Vendor at: Tech 101 - Arcus, Inc. 16812 Millikan Ave Irvine, California 92606 To City at: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 9258~ Attn: City Manager rn receipt requested, addressed to the address ter designate by Notice: 21. Governing Law. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning thisIAgreement shall take place in the municipal, superior or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. 22. Entire Agreement. Th' A I . Is greement contmns the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 23. Authority To Execute This Agreement. on behalf of Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the authuri Vendor and has the authority to bind Vendor to the performance of its ob IIII he person or persons executing this Agreement , to execute this Agreement on behalf of the igations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to thi the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Approv Agreement have duly executed in on '~d as to form: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Peter MI Thorson, City Attorney Vendor Tech 1( - Arcus, Inc Est. 1987 - Formerly H.Co. Computer Products lO-Ol-Ol City of Temecula Tom I-Iafeli At thi~ tim~, Think Computer Products will have to rescind on the bid for .t;39,054.75 for the computer systems. We are a Intel IPD reseller and ,.ha~e bee, told .fro..m'[ilte! directly that the 1GHZ Intel pwc~ssor you wanted for this bid that w~ quoted Is dis,:onfinued and not being manufactured by Intel anymore. Our company can not s~,ice a ."!yr, scrviccable itctn ffthe manufactur~ has stopped producing. Product can't be discontinued from manufacturers if Th nk Computer Prod-,:tcts is to warranty thc syst~ns for 3 years. Wc are not able to pm :base Intel retail processors from our normal channel because of th~. discontinuation and ?w av'ailable iuve~bry on this product, The bid request on thcsc systems was in early ~ mgust, and we received confirmation a~ tho end of September which was beyon~, our illvoutoty coil':roi. Sincerely, Bryon Strachan Systems Division Mnnager Think Computer Products www. thinkcomputerproducts.com · 16812 Hale Avenue · Irvine, Califoma 82606-5021 [ TOll Free: .(.,~00}7~6~477 Local 194g) 833-3222 Fax: (949} 83~-3389 - info@thinkcomDutemroduct~com ITEM 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: II APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE'-~"~-~ ~" ~..~?'~ J D~RECTOR OF F~NANCE' ~1 ?TY MANAGER Cl~ OF TEMECU~ AGENDA REPORT Ci~ Manager/Ci~ Council illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/Ci~ Engineer October 9, 2001 Pumhase of Ci~ Vehicle RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the purchase of one (1) 2001, Ford Ranger four (4) Door from Rancho Ford Lincoln Mercury for ~26,873.01. / BACKGROUND: The adoption of the 2001/02 annual Operating Budget approved the funding for the purchase of this vehicle. This vehicle is an addition to the current fleet and will be used by Public Works Traffic Division. On September 11, 2001, the Request for Proposal (RFP) forlthe purchase of City this vehicle was mailed to siX (6) local dealerships (see attached vendor list). Three (3) local dealerships provided a bid response to the RFP. The specifications called for a bid to be placed on model year 2001 vehicles that could be delivered within a 60 to 90 day period. Based on previously purchased vehicles this bid is considered competitive and is recommend~ed by staff. Also, the purchase pdce is within the budgeted amount. The purchase of these vehicles will satisfy the vehicular requirements for the identified department. The following are the bid resulls: / Dealer Vehicle / Mod~el ~ Price / Rancho Ford Ranger Full Size 4 Door $26,873.01 4WD Pick Up Norm Reeves Dodge Paradise Chevrolet Ram Quad Full Size 4 Door 4WD Pick Up Silverado Fu S ze 4 Door 4wd Pick Up FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Fis( the total vehicle purchase amount. Attachment: Vehicle Vendor List 1 r:.~agend $29,123.08 $31,317.98 alYear2001-02 Operating Budgeter ~ reports~2001~10/09\ Vehicle Purchase 2001,agn Vehicle Vendor List Paradise Chevrolet 26845 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 Rancho Ford 26895 Ynez Rd Temecula, CA 92591 Temecula Valley Toyota 26631 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 Norm Reeves Super Group 26755 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 Cardage Motor Company 41872 Motor Car Parkway Temecula, CA 92591 Nissan of Temecula 41895 Motor Car Parkway Temecula, CA 92591 2 r:~agenda reports~2001 \10/09\ Vehicle Purchase 2001.agn ITEM 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE_~____ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECUL~ AGENDA REPORT City Manager / City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager October 9, 2001 Approval of Development Impact Fe Temeka Advertising (42380 Zevo Drive) / PREPARED BY: Reimbursement Agreement with Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council apl,rove Development Impact Fee Reimbursement Agreement between the City and Ter~eka Advertising providing for the reimbursement of $10,400 of Development Impact Fees BACKGROUND: In 1998, the City Council gave prelimil ~ary approval to a waiver of $10,400 in Development Impact Fees for this business. This was done as part of economic development programs in effect at that time. Temeka /~dvertising has since completed its business expansion and the attached agreement would formalize this approval and provide for the appropriate fee reimbursement. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of such an agreement Iwould cause the reimbursement of $10,400 of Development Impact Fees, which have been previously collected. Funds are available for such reimbursement. accounts: Corporate Facilities - DIF Fire Protection Facilities - DIF Street Improvements - DIF Traffic Signals - DIF ATTACHMENT: Agreement These fees would 120-199-4245 120-199-4246 120-199-4242 120-199-4243 be reimbursed from the followin9 490.56 208.48 8,413.23 1,287.73 $10,400.00 C' IDOCUMENTS ~qND SETTING S[ADAMSA IL OCAL SETTINGSI TEMPIRWGIMAN1_6 70554_1, DOC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMEKA ADVERTISING (423~0 ZEVO DRIVE) TH S AGREEMENT ' ' ' · is maae aha effective as of Octooer 9, 2001, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and 'l'emeka Advertising, a California corporation. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This agreement is made with respect to the each party acknowledges as true and correct: Owner is the owner of the real propert Temecula, CA., which is legally descril fllowing facts and purposes, which located at 42380 Zevo Drive, ~ed on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set Iorth in full ("Property"). Owner warrants and represents to the City that it holds title to the Property and that no other persons, except for holders of deeds of trust, hold an ownership interests in the Property. b. The City Council of the City of Temecula has enacted a comprehensive development impact fee ordinance which is set forth in Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code. The actual development impact fees are set forth in Resolution No. 98-30 of th~ City Council as authorized by Section 15.06,020 of the Temecula Minicipal Code ("DIF"). / c. Chapter 15.06 of the Temecuta Municipal Code requires persons obtaining building permits for commerclial construction to pay a development impact fee established by the City Council. d. On January 13 1998, the City Council gave preliminary approva toa wawe of $10,400~n Development Impact Fees fora proposed expansion and relocation of Temeka Advertising. ISince that time the Owner has constructed a building of approximately' 17,400 square feet and currently employs approximately 40 persons and has paid DIF fees in the amount of $14,772, which represents full payment of development impact fees for this project. P e. Owner's development of the roject provides significant financial and economm benefits to the C~ty. The expansion of ~ts bus~ness enhances the area in which it is located and the general welfare of the community by creating additional employment opportunities and additional sources of tax revenue, and other economic benefits to the City. / Within ten days from the executiPn of this Agreement by the Owner, City shall rembursement the Development mpact Fees described below to the Owner, in the amount of $10,400 for the new building a~ 42380 Zevo Drive. These fees would be reimbursed from the following acco[ nts: C.'IDOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS~4DAMSAILOCAL SETTINGSITEMPIRWGIMAN1_670534_I.DOC 2 10/4/01 Corporate Facilities L DIF 120-199-4245 490.56 Fire Protection Facilities - DIF 120-199-4246 208.48 Street Improvements - DIF 120-199-4242 8,413.23 Traffic Signals - DIF 120-199-4243 1,287.73 10,400.00 The Owner shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for and hold the City and its elected and appointed officers and employees, harmless from all costs (including attorneys fees and costs, claims, demands or habd~t~es judgments for ~njury or damage to property and ~njunes to persons, including death, which may be caused by any of the Owner s act~wt~es under th~s Agreement or on the Property, whether such activities or performance thereof be by the Owner or anyone directly or indirectly ~mployed or contracted with by the Owner and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement. This indemnity includes, but is not limited to, any repair, cleanup, remediation, detoxification,~ or preparation and ~mplementation of any removal, remedial, response, closure or other plan (regardless of whether undertaken due to governmental~ action) concerning any hazardous substance or hazardous wastes including petroleum and its fractions · I as defined in the Comprehensive Enwronment~]l Response, Compensation and Liability Act ["CERCLA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, e_t seq.], the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ["RCRA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 e_tt seq.] and California Heath and Safety Code Section Code Section 25280 et seq. at any place where Owner owns or has control of real property pursuant to any of the Owner's activities under this Agreement. Th`" operate as an agreement pursuant to Section Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to as,, indemnify City from liability. foregoing indemnity is intended to 107 (e) of CERCLA and California ute, protect, hold harmless and delivery by a reputable document delivery ser~ Federal Express, that provides a receipt showi mailing in the United States Mail, certified ma requested, addressed to the address of the pa other address as that party may later designat The terms of this Agreement shall be incorporated into any conditions, covenants and restrictions or similar documents, for the Property filed after the date of this Agreement. / Any notices which either party may desire togive to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) ice, such as but not limited to, ~g date and time of delivery, or (iii) I, postage prepaid, return receipt · ty as set forth below or at any ~ by Notice: To City: To Owner: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager Temeka Advertising 42380 Zevo Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: President C:IDOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS~ADAMSA ILOCAL SETTING$iTEMPIRWGIMAN1_670534 1.DOC 11. This Agreement contains the entire understar ding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged ~nto th~s Agreement and shall be of no further force · I or effect. Each party is entering into th~s Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. This Agreement may not be altered or amended except by wri to be charged. In any action between the parties to interpret or otherwise in connection with any of the te~ Agreement, the prevailing party in the action :lng executed between the parties enforce, reform, modify, rescind, ms or provisions of this ;hall be entitled, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled, reasonable without limitation, litigation costs and reason~ Time is of the essence hereof. No waiver by City of any breach of or default deemed to be a waiver of any other or subse¢ hereunder. costs and expenses including, ble attorneys' fees. under this Agreement shall be uent breach thereof or default This Agreement and all related documents sh~ll be deemed to be contracts made and delivered in the State of California and shall be governed and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of sai State. C:[DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGSI.4DAMSAII. OCAL SETTINGSlTEMPiRWGIMANI_670534 1.006 4 10/4/01 I1~ WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and City hav~ the date first written above. executed this Agreement as of CFI Y OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero Mayor Atl Su§an Jones, CMC Cit' Clerk Apl~roved as to Form: Petbr M. Thorsen Cit~' Attorney OV~ NER A alifornia corporation By Name: Titl, By: Nar ~e: Title: C:IDOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS~4DAMSAILOCAL SETTINGSlTEMPtRWGIMANI_6?O534_1.DOC ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT ~,~ity Manager/City Council illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public October 9, 2001 Professional Services Agreement - Pavement Management Update - FY Project No. PW01-22 (RFP No. 98) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer APPROVAL ~'~/,..,..~ ClTYATTORNEY ~.~_ ~ DIRECTOROF FINANOE......~--~I CiTY MANAGER /~)/ ' Works/City Engineer erryman & Henigar ~001-2006 Steven W. Beswick, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve an agreement with Berryman & Henigar in an amount not to exceed $48,578.00 to provide the necessary design services needed to prepare the Update of the Pavement Management Program, FY2001-2006, Project No. PW01-22 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $4,857.80, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. BACKGROUND. I · This project consists of reviewir~g all public roadways within the City evaluating and upgrading the City's existing pavement management program software, and provides capital improvement planning for the pavement rehabilitatio~ program. / The recommendations provided by the Pavement Management System Update includes summarizing the conditions of the pavement for each street s~ction as measured by various types of distresses and a calculated Pavement Condition Rating. The final Pavement Management Program report will establish a prioritized list of projects with recommended improvement based on cost- benefit formulas. The improvements to City roadways will include,, slurry seals, overlays, crack seals, and reconstruction. The Pavement Rehabilitation Program in the Capital Improvement Program and budget for FY2002- 2006 has allocated approximated $6,522,000.00 for reconstrucbon and rehabilitation of City roadway. The U date of the Pavement Mana FISCAL IMPACT: p gem~nt System is part of the Public Works Department Maintenance Division Operating Budget for ~Y2001-2002. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 001-164-601-5248 for the amountlof $48,578.00 plus the contingency amount of $4,857.80 for a total cost of $53,435.80. r:~agdrpt~2001~1009~B&HRFP98.agr ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Location 2. Professional Services Agreement 2 r:~agd rpt',2.001\1009\B & H RFP98,ag r City of T ~/Highways Centerline City Legend N CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PAVEMENT MANGEMENT SYSTEM! FY2001-2006 PROJECT NO. PW01-22 (RFP No. 98) THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of October 9, 200'1, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporaton (Cry) and Berryrnan & Henigar, ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on October 9, 2001, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks descnbed here~n are completed, but in no event later than October 9, 2003, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the ~)rovisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, atta'~'~-~'a h~to and ncorporated here n as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks accord ng to the schedule of performance which ~s also set forth ~n Exhibit A. the best of his o3r' her a~~~nCd°t~eU~tt~teSdhoa;Imata~l ~atlsr~ef~/l~elldy't~eOrmeipne, t~not~Ys~r~tda~ shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to !he provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Counc has obta ned the general prevailing rate of per d~em wages and the general rate for hohday and overbme work in th~s locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute thisI Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file! with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. ConsUltant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay ~he adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply w th the prov sons of Sect ons 1773 8, 1775, 1776, 1777 5, 1777.6 and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $2.5.00 for each calendar day, or port on thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanm employed, pa~d less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under th s contract, by h m or by any subcontractor under h~m, m wolabon of the provisions of the Contract. Payroll records, Certified Payrolls, shall be submitted to the City with each invoice· Payments will be withheld pending receipt of any outstanding reports. 5. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthl in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount sha no! exceed Forty E ght Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Eight Dollars and no Cents ($48,578.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless add~bonal payment ~s approved as prowded ~n th~s Agreement. 1 !~cip~pmjects'~wq!?22'~Ben'y~nan&Henigar agrmt A b. Consultant shall not be compensated )r any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing be compensated for any additional services in the amounts Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authori; performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to excee y the City Manager. Consultant shall nd in the manner as agreed to by City :ation is given to Consultant for the ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum (basic agreement amount and contingency amount) exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice invoice. 6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION O a. The City may at any time, for any reas any disputed fees set forth on the : AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. )n, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving uPon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the C~)nsultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination Ishall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant a reasonable amount for the work performed up to the time of termination. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in defa ~lt for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue c6mpensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's contiol, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. ~ / b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Ag!eement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have t10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of lime, the City shall have the dght, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 2 ~cip~orojects~pw01"22~Berryman&Henigar agrmt A 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete nd accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such informatiop required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultantshall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation 6f services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accour~bng principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or ~ts designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give C~ty the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained fora period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. / b. Upon completion of, or in the eventof termination or suspension of this Agreement, all ong~nal documents designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other document,s prepared ~n the course of prowd~ng the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shal/become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by th~ Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data gE make available to the City, upon reasonable written request software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compilin files. c. With respect to the design of public in' City without the permission of the nerated for the work, Consultant shall by the City, the necessary computer transferring and printing computer rovements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the wntten consent of the Consultant. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the ~ ~'~cials, employees ~nd volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, it~ officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injur~ to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful act~ or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 10. INSURANCE REQU REMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for ~njunes to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. / / a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: / (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability fOrm No. CG O0 01 11 85 or 88. / (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA O0 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3 : : : . r~\cip~projects~pwO 1-2 2\Beriynan & Henig ar agrmt A (3) (4) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Llablhty Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while perform ng under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is notlrequired, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees p f ro essional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consul ¢) General Liability: $1,000,0C personal injury and property Insurance or other form with 'or the Consultant's profession. :ant shall maintain limits no less than: 0 per occurrence for bodily injury, mage. If Commercial General Liability ~eneral aggregate limit is used, either (2) (3) the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Automobile Liability: $1,000 properly damage. Worker's Compensation as Employer's Liability: One milli( bodily injury or disease· ~00 per accident for bodily injury and 'equired by the State of California; dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for (4) Professional Liability coveragq One million ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retenti 3s. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate Such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The geheral liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the follow!ng provisions: / (1) The City, its officers, officials,~mployees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of actvties performed by or on behalf of the Consu rant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobdes owned, leased, h~red or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to thi~ project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, offic als, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained bythe City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 4 w cts r:, 'p~proje ~ow01-22'~Berryman&Henigar agrmt A (3) Any failure to comply with repo~ ting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warrantk s shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers, Th ~ It t' ' ,I II I t I t h' d (4) e ~onsu an s ~nsurance sna app y separa e y o eac insure against whom claim is made orIsuit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. E I I I (5) ach insurance po icy required by this cause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days pnor wntten nobce by certified mad, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. nsurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. V fi t f I f. eri ~ca ion o Covera.qe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. Th'e endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times rerr ain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all t~mes be under Consultant s exclusive d~recbon a~d control. Neither C~ty nor any of ~ts officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control Over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as se{ forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any t~me or ~n any manner represent that ~t or any qf ~ts officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever agaiist City, or bind City in any manner· / b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees pald to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consu tant for njury or s ckness ar s ng out of perform ng serv ces hereunder. Th CI It t h II 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. e onsu an s a keepitselfinformedofall local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulabons which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its sel vice pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all SL ch ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable a: law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 5 . ':'~ ~ ~ :,- . r:~cip~projects~ow01-22~aeftyman&Henigar agrmt A 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant ir be considered confidential and shall not be released by C authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or s authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, information concerning the work performed under this Agr performance of this Agreement shall 3nsultant without City's prior written Jbcontractors, shall not without wdtten the City Attorney, voluntarily provide 'esponse to interrogatories or other .~ement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify Ci~ should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding thi there under or with respect to any project or property located but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be presE proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City an review any response to discovery requests provided by Cons any such response does not imply or mean the right by * response. 14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be g delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as b[ s Agreement and the work performed within the City. City retains the right, nt at any deposition, headng or similar J to provide City with the opportunity to Jltant. However, City's right to review ity to control, direct, or rewrite said ~ady may desire to give to the other yen either by (I) personal service, (ii) t not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or ( ) ma ng n the United States Mail, cerbfied mad, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later' designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below o~ on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: To Consultant: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 9 -)589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attenbon: C~ty Manager Berryman & Henigar 2001 East First Street I Santa Ana, California 92705-4020 Attention: Yazdan Emram, M.S., P.E. 15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without pdor wdtten consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date ofltermination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. / 16. LICENSES. At all times during the ter~n of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all hcenses required of ~t by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 6 17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Con,~ultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of Ca--the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or ~ederal distdct court w~th geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailin~ party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. / 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this A~reement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to nobly the City ~n the event any such interest s d scovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or th~s Agreement. 19 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the part~es relating to the obhgat ons of the part es descr bed n th~s Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force orieffect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set fortl'~ herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants ~nd represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 7 ".~cip~projects~pwO1-22~Berryman&Henigar agrmt A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be day and year first above written. CITY O! Attest: Susan Approve executed the ' TEMECULA eft Comerchero, Mayor Jones, CMC, City Clerk As to Form: Peter M.! Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Berryman & Henigar 200t EaSt First Street Santa Aha, California 92705-4020 (714) 568-7300 Yazdan Emrani, M.S., P.E., Sr. Vice President By: Name: Title: (signatures of two corporate officers requi~ ed for CorpOrations) 8 ~ · , r~cip~projects~pw01-22\B; erryman&Henigar agrmt A EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORIV ED g . · ~ :ip~orojects~pw01-22\Berryman&Henigar agrmt A Proposal to Provide Consultant Services for the U )date of the Pavement Management Program SECTION 3 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND Apl'ROACH/SCOPE OF WORK pROjECT UNDERSTANDING Pavement Management Program, Berryman & Henigarwill not 0nly resurvey the entire network but will create a comprehensive program that will include_proactive~-ye~r CIP re--porting, educational training, ~tewardship,_GIS links, GASB 34 compliance and software training. Berryman & Henigar has met with C ty Eng near ng staff (Mr Steven Besw ck, Mr Amer Attar, and Mr John De Gange) to estab sh the Oty s ~mmed~ate and long-tern Pavement Management Program goals for th~s proJect and d~scussed the value-added services which set our firm apart. As the City continues to show dynamic growth with its population, infrastructure, and maintenance needs, the street network is running parallel as new developmeqts, annexations, and capital street projects widen and lengthen streets. With the City's GIS system incorporating more recent changes to the network, the MicroPAVER dataset that was updated in early 1998 needs to show identical information. A through assessment of both the GIS centerline, AutoCAD, and PMS data needs to be the first priority. With our ce~ified MicroPAVER staff, we will quickly assess City data for viable, quality data that w be a cornerstone to the projects success W th severa projects under our be ts that m rror Temecula s needs, ~ncludmg Yorba L~nda and Rancho Palos Verdes Pavement Management proJects, our team wdl be able to meet the C~ty s scope requirements as well as ~mplement proacbve value added services" to mentor, educate, and train City staff with p~vement management methodologies. Berryman & Henigar has discussed these goals and objectives ~,ith City staff and currently has all 1998 MicroPAVER data (from rp~e~vJous_pavement management system) in-house which gives otJr sta~ff the unique ability to immediately begin condition assessments that w'l!_b~e cost effective to the project. With a completed survey, our team will be able to establish a pavement management program that will provide an ongoing schedule of needed repairs and provide data that will be used to prepare budget estimates required to complete the scheduled work. PROJECT APPROACH The City of Temecula has recognized the need to continually improve the approach utilized for managing its pavement and ROW network. Specifically, the City has requested proposals from consultants experienced in conducting Pavement Management Programs to assist the City in their efforts to update and enhance their existing 5-Year PMS Program with street, sidewalk and curb and gutter inventories. The City of Temecula is currently using MicroPAVER to manage all pavement assets. We are confident that we can meet the City's projected timeline to complete this project. Through our knowledge and expenence of M~cmPAVER v4.2, we wdl prowde the C~ty w~th an updated citywide Pavement Management Program which will allow the City to make cost-effective pavement management decisions that optimize the expenditure of street aintenance funds. B~F~ Project Onderstandin~ and Approach / Scope of Work ~e~ I I · · · I · · · I · Proposal to Provide Consultant Services for the Update of the Pavel ement Program With our working knowledge of the City's pavement network, discussions with key City staff and future asset management needs, we have developed an approach whiih will: · Provide updated PMS to assist City with GASB 34 cq~n3pliance, · Condition analysis which can be presented in GI$ through custom applications; ' I · Determinethepresentconditionstatusofthepavem~ntnetwork(artedal, collector, and residential streets), as a whole and of any grouping or individual component within the City; Produce a ranked list of streets, or segments of streets, by condition; Determinerehabi/itation/maintenanceneedsofeach~treetsegment yyear(Le., generation of new 5-year slurry seal recommendations); · Determine an optimized priority maintenance and rehabilitation program based on cost/benefit analysis and various levels of funding; Determine optimum annual budget levels for pavem~ fo/lowing five (5) years; Predict the future performance of the Citiy's paveme~ section; and · I · · · · Link Updated MicroPA VER database with the Cit] Train City staff to establish in-house stewardship for nt maintenance for the current and the network and each individual street 's existing Arcview basemap ~utura pavement management needs Berryman & Henigarwill perform the following services in accordance with the scope of services outlined in the City of Temecula's Request for Proposals. As a c uick overview, the following tasks shall be identified in this section. Task 1: Task 2: Task 3: Task 4: Task 5: Task 6: Task 7: Task 8: Task 9: Task 10: Task 1t: Project Orientation Assessment and Improvement of Existing City PMS, Update of PMS - Pavement Condition Survey Prepare Network Data Report Develop Recommended Improvement Program (Ta.~ CAD, and GIS Files ks 5.7) Define Repair/Rehabilitation Strategies and Paveme 3t Life Cycles Develop Recommended Improvement Program Using Cost Benefit Analysis Prepare Executive Summary Final Report Defining GIS Segmentation-Mapping Provision of Materials, Training, and Manuals On-Call, On-Demand Support Services GASB Statement 34 Infrastructure Compliance for P ~vement (Optional) Project Understanding and Approach / Scope of Work Proposal to Provide Consultant Services for the U of the Pave ~nent Management Program TASK 1: PROJECT ORIENTATION A pavement management project requires the cooperation and c oord,ination of meny people, and for management priorities. The Berryman & Henigarteam will mee~ to discuss in detail the expectations of the project and the MicroPAVER tools to be used by Berryman & Henigar staff in relation to data collection, pavement analysis, and CIP reporting. From there, an initial review of the key data will be completed to determine what assets the City would like to have Surveyed above and beyond pavement distress. i The first key tOpics tO be discussed will include the review and assessment Of the existing pavement! data, City annexations, data quality and condition, current procedures and applications for pavement maintenance, available resources, historical expenditure levels, ~nd desired service levels. Other key issues will be to define the capabilities and benefits ofjthe MicroPAVER pavement management sof~ware being used by the City. This will establisl? a proiect structure and schedule that conforms to the internal workings of the software. In regard to pavement analysis, a key component of these d'scussions wil focus on data collection methods, inspectibn, and budgeting analysis and how they will be used in the future to ensure the most effective resultS. J Through these discussions our Project Team will gain an understanding of the unique needs and wil identify specific areas of concern that will need to be included a~ part of the pavement management program. TASK 2' ASSESSEMENT AND IMP.,OVEMENT OF E×ISTING PMS, CAD AND GIS DATA In order to update and improve the City s existing PMS, basemaJps, and GIS d_a,t.a, we would like to have access to the most recent MicroPAVER dataset, CAD, and GIS coverage s currently maintained by the City. Berryman & Henigarwill review existing files to assbss existing street naming conventi,ons, as well as ensure a one-to-one match for joining, linking, or querying the GIS data and PAVER PID s at later dates. Upon assessing this data, our team will develop andrecommend effective scenarios to improve the software capabilities and data output. Based on th~ recommendations, our staff will sit down with the City to discuss the cost effectiveness of all options set forth. ' J d Also, our staff will also update the City s AutoCAD basemap to show all maintained and non-maintaine streets. This is a critical step in quality control, where all routes !o be surveyed need to be identified. With the City annexing large developments, additional pavemen'~ sections that have been constructed or are scheduled for construction need to be built into the syste~ immediately. / TASK 3 UPDATE OF PMS - PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY Validation of Inventory Segmentation Criteria The first step in conducting the p,avement condition survey will be to validate and confirm the inventory segmentation criteda for the City s pavement network. This will ibe based from the information obtained from the City and the existing database and will act as an initial quality control for standard street naming conventions. Project Onderstandin~ and Approach / Scope of Work Proposal to Provide , Consultant Services for the Update of the Pavement Management Program Once all routes have been validated, Berryman& Heniga~r will visually review a 10 percent sample set of Temecula pavement data from M'~VER (the sample set will include ~rial, collector and residential routes). This will allow City staff to see the cost effectiveness of our datasets to the City's ArcView-coverage's. Berryman & Henigarihas developed custom in-house ODBC linked applications to work between MicroPAVER PMS softwarei and ArcView. Our GIS Programmers on staff will also demonstrate the "GIS value added" services w~ will be providing to the City for this project. These services can are shown in detail under Task 8 of this scope. In validating and updating of the MicroPAVER dataset our staff Will include all critical pavement data / (e.g., inspection/distress, street dimensions, work I-iistory information, structural and dale data, etc.), which will allow our staff to calculate the existing Pavement Condition Indices (PCI) based upon a 0~ 100 scale. This information will then be entered into MicroPAVER, which is MS Access-structured software. It is key to note with the versatility and flexibility of MicroPAVER, there are several user-defined fields, which are specific to individual street sections that can be designed to hold additional roadside data that pertain to specific street sections (C&G and sidewalk dimensions, etc.). These task items will be defined during the project orientation. These additional records Ican be extremely valuable to the City when valuation compliance for GASB 34 is needed. We have included "Optional GASB 34" services in Task 11 of this scope. Field Review Once the pavement network to be surveyed has been verified, the inspection of approximately 130 centerline miles will be made, and all conditions recorded, based upon actual surface conditions and physical characteristics of the segment. Surveying methods typ~Fally are conducted by surveying 100 percent of the surface area; a more accurate indication of road Conditions is generated thereby producing a more accurate estimate of maintenance and rehabilitation costs. The visual (windshield) survey is performed by a team of experienced and trained Berryman & Henigar personnel using an automated system to c~ollect field data (collection of data is recorded into our field Compaq Ipaq units then downloaded into the matching MicroPA VER databa$~J~s). This data is -Ebllected on-board then transferred at the end of the day t~ our in-house workstations for_ quality control and data population. Based on street conditiqns and/or traffic, our staff will measure specific or distinct distress types by hand. An example of the information that is collected/verified during the survey for the Pavement Management database is Ii§ted below: 1. Attribute Data · Designation of ownership or jurisdiction such as City, C( ,unty, State or Federal agencies, and Privately owned property · Name ofstreetr · From/To, indicating the assigned limits of the section · Segment codification, which will allow for assignment o! special designations (i.e., truck routes and school zones) as well as mainten; ,nce districts · Street classification indicating functional class: arterial, ;o/lector, residential, etc. · Number of travellanes Project Understanding and Approach / Scope of Work Ii ~ Proposal to Provide i . Consultant Services for the Update of the Pavement Management Pro ram Ii°PresenceOfcurbandgutterandsidewalkineachsectiO(CriticalfOrGASB34)' ' Segment quantities, indicating the length, ROW, width, a~d total area of the section (Critical · for GASB 34) Surface type: AC, PCC, gravel, dirt We welcome staff members from the City of Temecula to join ANY portion of our survey efforts. Condition data will be evaluated for all street segments and shal include the following condition characteristics: 2. Condition Characteristics edge cracking, raveling, bleeding etc.). Specific types o~distresses to be measured will be determined prior to the start of the inventory. · Drainage Condition Rating will be completed for each segment. · Pavement Condition Index (PC/), taking into account thelsurface condition, level of distress, dde and drainage to provide an overall condition assessment. The numbering system ranges between 0 - 100, with 0 indicat/hg a fai~ed pavement and 100 indi'cating a new pavement (approximately 20-year life expectancy without preventive maintenance). · Ride quality, ranging from a perfectly smooth ride to o~e that is very rough and may pose a safety hazard. ~ Sinut~ aaccec~u~d;tie~esr~ i~s~ub~fa~a~cuh~eadctae~dst~asc~ hw;;gt~nee~nntg~ae%d~wtth an Overall scOre' taklng The specific types of pavement distresses to be ~ ~ -- collected will be reviewed during discussions with City staff prior to the start of the survey. We would expect to collect data on the extent and ACBu~,~ m~ .... ~c c~,~ I.~--~ seventy of distresses such as rutbng, ravehng, Aco~*~, ~~-----' depressions, utility cuts, block and fatigue (alligator-type) cracking. Other types of distress data that might be of particular concem to the City, such as from truck damage or County/City bus routes, will also be collected. This information will allow us to conduct the L=====J[~ inventory in a simple, fast, and efficient manner. ~~1~ City personnel can participate and observe for any pedod of time during the field inventory. Project Understandin~ and Approach / · Sco~ of Work ~ Proposal to Provide date of the Consultant Services for the U Pavement Management Program At the time of surveying, Berryman & Henigar staff will perform a uality control test within the pavement management software using a sample set of Temecul~ street distress data. This will ensure that all system and analysis settings as well as City recommendations and standards are programmed correctly. Reg,ular status meetings during the pavement condition survey, between Berryman & Henigarand the City s Project Manager, will be conducted to report on project status, concerns, and quality control I efforts' This is typically dOne with bi-mOnthly Or monthly meetin'gs dependent upon the City's current! workloads (see Project Manager, Section 2, Project Schedule, S~ction 5). Any action items from these meetings that need to be made will be completed and data collection and entry process will continue. Berryman & Henigar staff will input all collected pavement data into the software, and will enter any I ! additional roadside data that has been defined for this project. Our staff and surveyOrs will be responsible for organizing the work to minimize traffic disruption ~n the City's street system. All work w be performed n accordance w th OSHA standards, and furthermore, Berryman & Henigar staff will inform City engineering and police staff when and where our teams will be working within the week's period. Using this software, all items listed above will be maintafned by Berryman & Henigar for the duration of this project. We will provide your staff with the electronic copies of your upda!ed/converted MicroPAVER database files for inclusion into your licensed co~y of MicroPAVER v-4.2 PMS software. Berryman & Henigar wi~~hand~~~~~~icensingf~rupgrad~ngth~C~ty~fTeme~u~at~the~atestvers~~n~fM~cr~PA~ER~~ . . . , . I .... and the hcense wdl be tn the C~ty s name. All converslon/vepficat~on w~ll be performed ~n-house at Berryman & Henigar using the most recent version release. From there we will coordinate with your staff in order to purchase the software and/or implement the new files with your information services/communication network. TASK 4: PREPARE NETWORK DATA REPORT Upon completion of the Pavement Condition Survey, , ........... Berryman & Henigar will prepare a report that documents the condition of all pavement segments inventoried. The report will serve as the primary method for quality control of the data to be included in the final report. The City will ,~ _ review these reports and our staff to ensure that all . inventory data is correct. As mentioned in Task 3, our staff will conduct an in-house "pilot study" with actual pavement data taken from our ~ : · surveys. Once this has been completed and all data has -- been entered into the updated system, our staff will nenerate a Network Data Renort that will include' Present Status/Condition Distribution Graph · Network/Street Database · Pavement Condition Index(PCI) Report and Approach/ Project Understanding Scope of Work ~ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Update of the Pave Proposal to Provide Consultant Services for the Management Program · D_urainage and Ride Report · Present Status/Condition (shown to the right) · Network Needs Analysis · Maintenance/Rehabilitation Report (Task 7) · Maintenance Schedule (Task 7) · Budget Analysis Report (Task 7) A presentation/meeting will be conducted with City staff and at that time, any action items, edits, or recommendations will be made and delivered in the Final Repo[l (Task 7). DEVELOP RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK 5: DEFINE REPAIR/REHABILITATION STRATEGIES AND PAVEMENT LIFE CYCLES Following the acceptance of the pavement network data report, ~/arious repair/rehabilitation strategies will be d~scussed. Berryman & Hen/garwill help the City develop th~ most cost-effect've preventat've maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation strategies possible. This will be accomplished by meeting with the City to discuss and strategize on maintenance activities that would be applicable to the City. With MicroPAVER, the existing "decision tree" or "decision matnx ha~ the ability to b_e matched to any existing strategy that is currently in use by the City of Temecula. We wil! work with-the City to develop the necessary maintenance strategies and also build or recommend approaches that may be beneficial to this project and future activities. These strategies typically include R&R, chip seals, cape seals, slurry seals, overlays, and reconstructions based on the condition of the maintenance sechons, the expet~ted ~mprovement m pavement condd~on and life cycle extension which would result, and the unit co§t ofeach maintenance. PAVEMENT LIFE CYCLE STANDARD DETERIORATION CURVE PCI (Pavement Condition Index) 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 PAVEMENT LiFE (YEARS) 19 21 23 25 27 Project Understanding and Approach / Scope of Work · ~ ~ ProposaltoProvide Consultant Services for the Update Pavement Management Program of the The strategy assignments will be based on road class, maintenance zones, and type of surface, which are user defined and flexible, allowing selection of appropriate activities, unit costs, and life cycles for · · · · · · I · the pavement management program. / / Berryman & Henigaralso reviews the standard deterioration curves that will be developed based on traffic volumes, pavement surface, and road class. The curves will be modified based on local pavement cond~bons present at the bme of the survey. Berrym~n & Hemgar wtll also benchmark Temecula's unique deterioration curve to similar surrounding agencies that we have worked with in San Diego and Orange Counties. TASK 6: ANALYSIS / Berryman & Henigar's Project Manager and Principal will work Closely with City staff in defining repair and rehabilitation strategies during each fiscal year (2001-2006). Once the repair/rehabilitation strategies have be~n defined, the the recommended maintenance and software will be used to identify ' rehabfl~tabon projects for each street over a g~ven penod of bme, typically 5 to 7 years. The recommended projects will be ~denbfied on the bas~s of several criteria: cost/benefit of individual strategies, present pavement cond~bons, current traffic volumes, current and unconstrained funding level s, accrued backlog levels, future routine and major maintenance needs based on projected deterioration rates, future AHRP objectives and goaL~ desired levels of service and available resources. DEVELOP RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM USING COST BENEFIT "The maintenance recommendations made by any software are only as good as the engineering fundamentals that support them." The primary emphasis of this task is to maximize the programn the most cost-effective strategies available, and taking into account a life cycle cost analysis of each strategy recommended. Within our report, several scenarios will be presented for the City to consider or compare against. Th s w II ~nclude reporbng on the City s actual CiP budget (i.e., $1.4 mflhon in 2001-2002, $850,000 in 2002-2003), and proposed, unlimited, and constrained budgets. Following this analysis, maintenance project lists will be generated for the several funding level scenarios: the existing "actual" amount of available funds (i.e., City's funding level) and proposed, unlimited, and constrained funding levels given the most cost effective Pavement Management Plan. In this way, if available funding is less than required for completion of recommended projects within a given year, it will be easy to determine which projects can be deferred with the least impact on current pavement condition and futura rehabilitation cost. Project Understandin~ and Approach / Scope of Work ~ng of street maintenance projects using Comparison of Budget Scenarios U Proposal to Provide Consultant Services for the late of the Pavement Manag ram TASK 7: PREPARE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FINAL REPORT The Final Pavement Management Program Report will provide a summary of the findings from the cond t on survey w~th the corresponding recommendat'ons for the 'mplementat'on of the most cost- effective maintenance program each year. The-report will be prepared in a format that will utilize the inform~ ~tion found in the computerized PMS reports in conjunction with the information and analysis performdd by the Berryman & Henigar Pavement Management Team. The report will provide the City ~ ~ith information on: · Current pavement conditions shown in tabular and graf surface types (pavement condition report, priority listings · Projected annual repair/rehabilitation programs for streei year period (Action Forecast Report) which demonstrate · Project schedules and associated budgets (i.e., adjustec on user selected inflation factors) for the entire network, each fiscal year over the given period of time (typically 5 · Priority projects that should be scheduled for immediate priorities and existing conditions; · An analysis that allows the City to measure and underst~ maintenance for the City street network; _a_?_d~ ical format for all road classes and r~aintenance on all streets for a five- the largest return on investment; for inflation within the software based ~s well as each street segment, for .7 years); maintenance, based on user defined ~nd the impact on and cost of deferred Review and development of recommended funding programs for street related improvements. TASK 8: DEFINING GIS SEGMENTATION - MAPPING With the complete survey and verification of alleGIS street intersection Dod~ poi~nts, our staff~-~:~-e~{~ {~ d~¥~-~one r~tch with th~ ~ity's ~iS-. With age of oveflays, sh~rf~ce types, width changes, and pavement conditions defining segmentation, our staff will create the required link to allow the joining of pavement data to City ArcView map. This will be shown in our presentation in Task 3 where our methodology and successful projects will be highlighted. Screenshot Project Understanding and Approach / Scope of Work · Temecula pavement database linked to Centerline ArcView GIS Idler ! ! · ! · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Proposal to Provide Consultant Service~ for Update of the Pavement Management Program Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Implementation Berryman & Henigarwill provide GIS linkages, operational, and ]pport services for this project where we will work closely with Mr. De Gange's GIS group to establish the necessary PMS-GIS functionality for the City of Temecula. Also, our staff will meet with each I~ , member of the PMS project to assess what information they would like to be able to quer~ for using the "custom applications" built by Berryman & Henigar. With this value-added servic~ provided by our staff, the City's ability to filter for pavement data will greatly increase from t~e querying functionality that is limited currently in MicroPA VER. I I Most pavement management systems have the capability of interfacing GIS datasets through the use of ArcView, AutoCAD, or other GIS compatible software. Specifically, MicmPAVER's "PAVERGIS" allows all pavement assets and information to be linked directly !o city coverage's (ArcView/AutoCAD) with a one-to-one relationship. Within MicroPAVER there is a Polygon Identifier (PID) that represents unique/street sections, from and to des~gnabons, and point Iocahons. Berryman & Hen;gar staff w~ll rewew and asses the ex~sbng centerline and polygon files used by the City to ascertain that thgre will be a one-to-one relationship between the updated pavement database and the City GIS coverage. This ensures that future GIS research efforts and the creabon of project maps will be projected properly due to the one-to-one match of PID s. Quality co,ntrol measures will be taken to ensurgthat all new sections that are represented within the City s GIS will be reflected within the uPdated MicroPAVER database. Once the City has approved Network Data Report our staff will necessary linkages. By using PAVERGIS and the custom appli City, individuals that are not familiar with GIS will be able to que information they desire. For example, Mr. Attar and Mr. Beswic applications built for Temecula staff without having to go-into .th, from the custom applications. :omplete the development of all ;ations our staff will develop for the 'y the data for specific roadway will be able to use the custom ~-PMS program; all queries can be run For example, the City will be able to filter for specific records (e.g., sections with PCI's < 40, or sections to be slurry sealed in 2002-2003). Those individual records will be highlighted on the map or record table (or filtered for). By working within ArcView, performing a filter on a ArcView "table" or by using the "custom applications" built by Berryman & Henigar, those selected pavement records will be filtered for right on the map. Screenshot of Custom Application ProjectScope of Understanding Work and Approach Proposal to Provide Consultant Services for the date of the ent Management Program TASK g: PROVISION OF MATERIALS, TRAINING AND MANUALS With training being one of the top priorities for the City of TemeCUla's Engineering staff, our staff will make every effort to provide City staff with the necessary skills needed to steward and maintain the PMS. Berryman & Henigar will provide City staff with all pavem~ntJGIS data collected as well as updated operation manuals for both field data collection and software use. Based on the number of future users our staff will deliver as many copies as needed by City staff to facilitate the program. With Mr. Peter Bucknam and Mr. Mat Huff, Certified MicroPAVER Professionals, comprehensive multi-day Berryman & Henigarwill provide training in the techniques used to inventory the network pavement condition to City staff so that they have a clear understanding oflhow the system is developed and data recorded. City personnel will be versed in the proper procedures for data collection, thereby ensuring Pavement Management System Software Training I i the ability of the City to repeat the pavement surveyOn its Own when the need arises. This is a key issue for the City and one that will be heavily focused on. With the inclusion of key Berryman & Henigar technical staff that are fluent with MicroPAVER and PMS operations from the Public/Private sectors and implementation and development, a complete step-by-step training schedule will be established for City staff. At that point the City will be able to update each individual portion of the dataset as work requests, schedules, and record edits as n~eded. Berryman & Henigarwill provide pavement system software traiping which will concentrate not on y on the utilization and operation of the software, outlining the steps for proper on-going maintenance of the system database, but also on the necessary program tasks that are required to maintain and update the City's pavement management program on an annual basis· IThe training will include such items as: · System operation overview I · Review the process flow of annual activities required to maintain the program specific to the City of Temecula I · Mock replication of annual PMS support activities (i.e., re-inventory office procedures; updating of maintenance costs, strategy assignments, engineering data, deterioration curves; interpretation and utilization of management reports) The MicroPAVER program is a self-contained menu driven program which will allow the City to manage its pavement system by tracking street conditions, developing capital improvement budgets, and tracking historical workloads on all the street segments within tl~e City network. / For example, MicroPAVER version 4.2 is capable of: / / · Defining maintenance strategies, unit costs, pavement lile cycles, and deterioration curves; / · Developing budget and cost information which can be readily changed to reflect annual changes in fiscal requirements, and to reflect multi-year budgetin ~ needs (i.e., 'what if' budget analysis Project Understanding and Approach / H~.~I I' $cope. of Work ~ .... Propo.sa/to prov/de Consultant Serv,ces for the _U )date of the Pavement Management Program · comparing the impact on maintenance programs and service levels based on various funding levels); · Demonstrating graphically (i.e., pie charts, bar charts, etc.), and in tabular format, the overall I i condition levels for the entire street network based on the items mentioned above; · Compiling and stodng construction related information (i.e., "Design" and "As-built" highway sections); and · Entering and stodng completed maintenance projects to keep an archive of all work related activities relative to each pavement section. ~nadditi~nt~PMSs~ftw~r~training~B~rryman&H~nigarwi~~pr~videthetraininginArcViewf~rany G S "custom application" or coverage implemented by Berryman & Henigar. The training will concentrate not only on the utilization of the software, such as it~ SQL analysis, but on the use and operation of a Geographic Information System to produce reports, layouts, and spreadsheets. TASK 10: ON-CALL, ON-DEMAND SUPPORT SERVICES Berryman & Henigar will provide annual support for a period of two years providing quality and accurate Ii use °f the in'h°use °Per~tiOn Of the MicrOPAVER software' This will include receiving yeady pavement maintenance workload updates from the City, assessing and reviewing the City's upcoming maintenance schedule for that Fiscal Year, and conducting visual inspections to verify/edfl the recommendations for planned maintenance. The agreement wi I also include the provision of two years of combination on-site and telephone support for the City staff. Based on an as-needed basis, Berrgman & Henigarwill providelconsulting services requested by the City of Temecula regarding PMS reporting and analysis. Delive~'ables will include a final report based on the information requested as well as an executive summary describing the methodology employed. Additionally this task includes presentations to City Councils or &lected officials showing the results of the pro, ram. TASK 11: GASB STATEMENT 34 INFRASTRUCTURE COMPL ANCE FOR PAVEMENT (OPTIONAL) , This O~tional Scope of services is to provide the valuation of the City s pavement infrastructure to be in compliance with GASB Statement 34 reporting requirements that are a part of the new reporting model. / In order to accomplish the stated goal, Berryman & Henigar proposes the following scope of services for the City of Compton. , 1. Coordination: Berryman & Henigar will classify the Citys pavement by network or subsystem as needed. The classification of assets will be coordinated witl~ yourself and your auditors. 2. Records: Examine the Asset Management System dat and financial records, if needed for inventory completeness Project Understanding and Approach / Scope of Work ~ Proposal to Provide J J[ J J Consultant Services for the U date of the Pavement Management Program ~3.. Develop Historical Costs for Infrastructure Assets: Berryman & Henigar will develop an average composite unit cost for each street functional classification Jwithin the City. The historical costs for each street will be calculated based upon its functional classification, and age by using the ENR Construction Cost Index and the average composite unit costs to calculate the estimated costs at the date of acquisition. / / 4. Develop Recommended Depreciation Method(s): It is anticipated that depreciation will be done on a composite basis similar to the method used to develop composite unit costs for each class of infrastructure asset' The recOmmended depreciatiOn methOd(s) fOr each class Of infrastructure/ h asset will be reviewed with City staff and the City auditors. 5 c~f~'!ii !hh~ ~mmmmee~dV~e~d I ~h~v~ i li~ ~b~e~uUt~e~! ~a~r s~ I Cw&Ul Ii aHati~nl gi!~'~!~ii! ~ePP r ae (~?a~ m e~ ~ s ~ It 6. Review Asset Management Systems: If the City s desire to use the modified approac or ensure compliance with the criteria outlined in ParagraphI 23 of GASB Statement 34. This will include a review of the procedures used to maintain and update the inventory of infrastructure assets, the methods used to conduct pedodic condition ]assessments of those assets, and to estimate the annual level of funding needed to maintain and preserve those assets at the established condition levels. Where elements of the required asset management system(s) are not complete, we will provide the City with specific recommendations for upgrading those systems. levels for pavement, Berryman & Henigar will develop ~ecommended condition measurement criteria for adoption by the City. The measurement criteria will be developed based upon use of the data currently available within each asset management system, and the ability of the City to fund maintenance activities at the levels needed to preserve the ~sset at the condition level established. 8. Review Results: Review the draft results of the examination with City staff and the City auditors pdor to completion of the final report. / 9. Final Report: Submit Final Report which documents the processes used and project results. I Berryman & Henigar has provided complete GASB 34 servi(~.es to other cities including deve oping historical costs for all major infrastructure assets where actual cost data is not readily available, and then be depreciated on an annual basis each fiscal year. Project Understanding and Approach / Scope of Work Proposal to Provide Consultant Services for the Update of the Pavement Management Program Phase 1 Preliminary Infrastructure Assessment Compliance Strategy The Preliminary Infrastructure Assessment is a valuable ~~~fication of the infrastructure t° be valued' the decJsi°ns t° be made' and the valuati°n moth°ds t° be used' The proposed scope of services consist of the following tasks: 1. Determine the impacted departments and operations. 2. Identify the applicable infrastructure assets. 3. Recommend methods to be used for valuation of the ider~tified infrastructure assets. 4. Review existing asset management systems to determine compliance with the minimum guidelines for using the modified approach report method. 5. Prepare a compliance timeline, identify specific implementation steps and develop estimated compliance budget. 6. Prepare a Preliminary Infrastructure Assessment Report Containing: · Infrastructure to be valued · Recommended methods of valuation · Recommended "early" and "on time" compliance tim·lines · Specific implementation steps · Compliance budget. · Prepare a Preliminary Infrastructure Assessment Report Phase 2 Valuation Services After' the completion of Phase I and the City has made the decisions on issues such as the following What Reporting method will be used for each infrastructure network and subsystem? · How does the City plan to track future infrastructure cost on an automated basis? ° In which fiscal year will the City began reporting in accOrdance tO GASB 347I ' ' ' · Will the infrastructure assets in service before 1980 be included in the h~stoncal cost. The following steps will be accomplished during Phase 2, valuat on: · Coordination of classification of infrastructure networks/s'ubsystems with the city project manager throughout the project · Examine existing historical records for infrastructure assets · Develop historical costs for infrastructure assets · Develop recommended depreciation method · Establish extent of asset history to record, length of ass~ t useful lives, for each network/subsystem · Review asset management systems for compliance with modified reporting approach (if desired) · Develop recommended condition levels for each Infrastr Jcture asset (Modified Approach Infrastructure) · Prepare summaries of findings · Review results with appropriate staff · Issue final report. Project Understanding and Approach / Scope of Work Update of the SERVICES/INFORMATIO~N TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CIT~Y · Access to utility information, surveys (including any GIS drawings and other data on file with the City · A digital copy of the City's GIS base map including stree · Available structural sections of pavement · Latest Annual Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts · Most Recent City Map · Maintenance Road Mileage Report · Available Road Maintenance Records (materials, unit c¢ · Existing MicroPAVER PMS data Proposal to Provide Consultant Services for the ,ent Management Program tata), geotechnJcal data, traffic data, sectioning sts, engineering bJdS,g~etc. EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE 10 :\cip~oroject~pw01-22\Berryman&H~nigar agrmt A E ITEM 1 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPR V CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council ./~iiliam G. Hughes, Director of Public October 9, 2001 Parcel Map No. 29864, Located on South and Butterfield Stage Road Works/City Engineer outh West Corner of State Route 79 PREPARED BY: / Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Pbblic Works Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer-l.and Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council apprqve 1) Parcel Map No. 29864 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 29864 is a seven (7) parcels subdivision located on the southwest corner of State Route 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road. The street mprovements associated w~th this map, State Route 79 So~th and Butterfield Stage Road, were constructed as part of Assessment District 159 and they arein place. Wolf Store Road, along the southerly property boundary, is a private road and its improvements were completed as part of the requ red mprovements of the underlying Parcel Map 23172J On October 3, 2000 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tentative Parcel Map No.29864, with the appropriate condition of approvals. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Parcel Map No. 29864 1 r:~agdrpt~001\1009~om29864.rnap CASE NO. PM 29864 Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicabilit,. ,to this project. FEE Flood Control (ADP) To be Development Impact Fee To be CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL aid aid r:~agdrpt~001\1009~pm29864.map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 29864 DATE: October 9, 2004 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY I Street and Drainage$ 0 $ I 0 Water $ 0 $1 0 Sewer $ 0 SI 0 TOTAL $ 0 SI 0 Monument $ 5,000 I DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Eees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due 3 $ 0.00 To be paid To be paid $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $. 255.00 $ 255.00 $ 0.00 r:\agdrpt~.001 ~1009~m29864.map 0 · [] Il I I I ITEM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~xJ,,~William G. Hughes, Director of Public October 9, 2001 Authorize Temporary Partial Street C! APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE._~ CITY MANAGER Works/City Engineer 3sures for "Race for the Cure" Event October 21, 2001, in the Promenad( Mall area (Margarita Road, Solana Way, Ynez Road, and Overland Drivet. PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of P~blic Works ~_.~Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a ~ esolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES FOR INLAND EMPIRE "RACE FOR THE CURE" EVENT ON OCTOBER 21, 2001 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT. BACKGROUND: The Susan G. Komen Breast C~.ncer Foundation/Temecula Chapter has applied for permission to close portions of public streets in order to hold the Inland Empire Race for the Cure on Sunday, October 21,2001, on and around theI Promenade Mall area. Coordination for the activities on the Promenade Ma s te has been negotiated with the Mall Site Management. A number of sponsors are supporting this event. The directly affected streets, including Ynez Road, Solana Way, Margarita Road, and Overland Drive would require some partial or full closures on the event date. The Mall Ring Road, a private road, w II also be partially closed for the event. Provision for traffic movements along the race route and abutting streets have been reviewed and revised to m(~et traffic concerns along both major traffic routes and nelghbonng residences and businesses dunng the proposed event period. The race route begins at the starting line located on the Mall Ring Road, proceeds to the Mall Entrance Road opposite North General Kearny Read easterly over three (3) traffic lanes, then southerly along Marganta Road over two lanes of traffic, then westerly along Overland Dnve over four lanes of traffic to Promenade Way where the begmn~n§ of a raised landscaped median on Overland Drive reduces the leg to two lanes of traffic, then sodtherly along Ynez Road over one lane of traff c, then easterly along Solana Way over one lane of traffic, then northerly along Marganta Road over two lanes of traffic to Overland Dnve where the leg ~s reduced to one lane of traffic to Winchester Road where the course u-turns and proceeds southbound on Margarita Road over two / Mall Ring Road and the finish line located in a parking lot drive aisle off of the Mall Ring Road. Toh~ ~ i~11n°dW iDi ~ ~ ~ ~)vme~ iiaZne; t; ~ ;~ tbeent ~v ~ fe ~t r~ tr; 18 ~.i~ rl~aadn~!; ~ i iommeeSn ~ fd ~ I °V~i~ ii rl ~ gf ~c~oV~en~:' Overland Drive, between Promenade Way and Ynez Road,I will be partially closed. The two (2) eastbound lanes will be closed for the event. This street will be closed between 7:00 AM and 10:15 AM. Ynez Road - Ynez Road, between Overland Drive and SolaNa Way, will be partially closed. The easternmost northbound lane will be closed for the event. / / Solana Way - Solana Way, between Ynez Road and Margarita Road, will be partially closed. The northernmost westbound lane will be closed for the event. T AM and 10:15 AM. Margarita Road - Margarita Road, between Solana Way and The two (2) southbound lanes will be closed for the event fr Road, between Overland Drive and Winchester Road, will I: northbound lane will be closed for the event from 7:30 AM to Winchester Road and the Mall Entrance Road, will be parti lanes will be closed for the event. This street will be closed Mall Entrance Road (Private Street) - The entire Mall Entr General Kearny Road, will be closed entirely for the event. T AM and 11:00 AM. Mall Ring Road (Private Street) - A portion of The Mall Ring R, will be closed entirely for the event. The traffic control plan lis street will be closed between 7:00 )verland Drive, will be partially closed. ~m 7:00 AM to 10:15 AM. Margarita e partially closed. The westernmost 10:00 AM. Margarita Road, between tlly closed. The two (2) southbound )etween 7:45 AM and 10:15 AM. ~nce Road, the one opposite North lis street will be closed between 6:00 )ad, between the start and finish lines, hows the limits of closure. Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways" local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any ~treet for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons ,,~ho are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing". / / The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way. While a process was established for reviews and approva delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions The recommended resolution delegates the authority to appr Inland Empire "Race for the Cure" Event sponsored by Ti Foundation/Temecula Chapter. This authority is limited to an~ s, no mechanism was provided for ~f streets, for these special events. )ve temporary street closures for the e Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer I delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures etc. remain subject to the approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulat ons establ shed by the C'ty Council. These rules and regulations sha a so be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code 2 ection 21101. ~gdrpt~O0 l\lO09\RaceForTr~eCureStreetOlosu re The basic racecourse and event schedule is attached hereto more effectively allow the movement of traffic in and to the Pr the adjoining areas, the residential neighborhoods, and the FISCAL IMPACT: costs for City services have been accordance with the funding agreement with the Inland Err Breast Cancer Foundation. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2001- Sponsor's Proposed Traffic Control Plan & Event Hours Sponsor Event Brochure The approved traffic control plans will )menade Mall and other businesses in ~olana Ridge Apartments. )rovided for in the City budget in pire affiliate of the Susan G. Komen agdrpt~001\1009\RaceForTheCureStreetClosure RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES FOR INLAND EMPIRE "RACE EVENT ON OCTOBER 21, 2001, AND FOR THE CURE" AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES R AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code pro~ regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by loc WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rul closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety a WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authoriz~ the Inland Empire Inaugural "Race for the Cure" Event spon., ESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER ides for the promulgation of rules and authorities by Resolution; and, ~s and regulations for the temporary id protection; and, . the partial closure of public streets for ored byThe Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer FoundationFFemecula Chapter, for which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those st~'eets for the special event: and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the ~ssuance'l of permission to temporarily close public streets for the Inland Empire Temecula "Race f~r the Cure": and, / NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve temporary street closures for the Inland Empire "Race for th~ Cure" sponsored by The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundabon/Temecula Chapter, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the Inland Empire "Race for the Cure" Event on October 21,2001. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of October 2001. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Susan W.Jones, CMC, City Clerk 4 [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Teme¢,~la, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regula~ meeting thereof held on the 9th day of October 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: 5 ~usan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk ~gdrpt~2001\1009~,Race ForTheCu reStreetCIosure 'P~l ,~uJe~)t lejau~9 I.i.I 0 n- >- Ki//A~~T HE CURE® INLAND EMPIRE RACE 'FOR Meeting with City of Temecul 9/10/00 ATTACHED: City/Police- Timeline Expo Site Plan Course Maps Parking Map Traffic Plan was submitted prior to meeting UPDATE OF PERMIT ITEMS: 1. Communication - 40 walkie talkies will be used for communicatio ;: Channel gl Expo; Channel #2 Course: Channel #3 parking 2. Medical - A medical tent will be manned by physicians and nursec Its will be located at the finishline. An ambulance will also be at the finishline. Medical is on Channel #2 3.40 plus 2 Handicapped portapotties will be adjacent expo area. 4. Health permits will be applied for after food has been finalized 5. Music and sound systems will be at the locations indicated on the maps. Announcements will begin at 7AM music will begin after 7:#0 at General Kearny and after 8:00 at the ~her course locations. A- G 6. Parking plan is enclosed and has been approved by the Promenade Management. 7. Expo plan is enclosed and has been approved by Promenade Management. 8. No selling will be allowed by any entities other than the Komen F~undation volunteers. Food and souvenirs will be sold as a fund-raiser for Komen / 9. No purchase is necessary to be eligible for the Grand Prize drawing. 10. The rental company is TBD, they will pull the fire permit for any tents larger than 10 x 20. 11. Central Security will be providing security on Saturday night Oct. 20 12. . .... . . . . I Course vehicles w~ll be ~dent~fied w~th an Of£~c~al Vehicle placard on dash board. Course vehicles will include: A Ford Windstar, Ford Stake Bed and Ford mustang. / 1 Traffic equipment/Placement and removal: Is the city able to provide traffic equipment, manpower and/or cleanup support ? 2987 Highland Dr., Carlsbad, CA. 92008. (760) 434-1601. FAX (760) 434-7706 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: PLEASE ADD TO YOUR EVENT CALENDAR: DATE/TIME: ATTENDANCE: EVENT: REGISTRATION & INFORMATION: LOCATION: FEATURES: FEE: BENEFICIARY: Sunday, October 21, 2001 6:30 AM Registration 7:30am- Family 1 Mile 8:00am- Women's 5K, 9:00am - Coed 5K 10,000 KOMEN INLAND EMPIRE Women's 5K Run/Walk, Family 1 RACE FOR THE CURE® Mile Fun Walk, Coed 5K Run/Walk Register online at www. IEKOME N.com Race Hotline: (909) 695-0457 or ~ontact Kinane Events (760) 434-7706, m The Promenade, Temecula Rolling hills and USATF certified Expo, Kid's Expo, age group awa: competition. Adult Entry $25 $27 after $30 Day YouthISeniors $15 $20 after Survivors $15 [chelle @kinaneevents.com course. Features Health & Fitness ds, fantastic pledge prizes and team 10/15/01 af Event 10/15/01 ;usan G. Komen Breast The Inland Empire Affiliate of the: Cancer Foundation O00FIO00 BOOBOO0 0111300[-1 OdXg SOIN .LN'a~dlnlD::l INV"ld ,°mo otto [] [] C ~"~O00:l~:al¥~A HSINIJ ~ MJ BNIf'l glJl:l )llea~epl$ uo - $1B'I101 uJ Z Z:::) \ - C~ U.lO UJ Z gN'~rl :33 Ill Mall Road General Kearny Rd. NOTIFICATION OF SPECIAL EVENT DATE: EVENT: SCHEDULE: SUNDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2001 KOMEN INLAND EMPIRE RACE FOR TI 6:30AM - ll:00AM KIDS, HEALTH & Fir 7:30AM 1 MILE FAMILY FUb 8:00AM 9:00AM IE CURE® ITENS EXPO RUN/WALK WOMEN'S 5K RUN/WALK COED 5K RUN/WALI~ LOCATION: THE PROMENADE, TEMECULA (EXPO LOCATED IN LOT IN FRONT OF MARGARITA ROAD SOUTHBOUND MARGARITA ROAD NORTHBOUND SOLANA WAY WESTBOUND EDWARDS THEATER) - CLOSED FROM 7:00AM-10:15AM - UP TO 30 MII~. DELAYS 7:30AM- 10:00AM - CLOSED 7:00, ~M- 10:15AM (BETWEEN MARGARITA PKWY. & YNEZ RD.) OVERLAND DRIVE (BETWEEN MARGARIT ROAD & YNEZ RD.) YNEZ ROAD - CLOSED 7:00, - OPEN NORT TIMES (ONL'I CLOSED) **CALL KOMEN INLAND EMPIRE RACE FOR THE CURE, MORE INFORMATION M-10:15 ~IBOUND & SOUTHBOUND AT ALL 1 LANE SOUTHBOUND LANE IS .T (909) 600-7156 FOR INLAND EMPIRE RACE FOR THE CURE~ 5K & I MILE RUNA6/ALK Sunday. Oct. 21, 2001 The Promenade 6:30AM-Noon THE MALL Ynez Rd. ITEM 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City ManagedCity Council /~'~William G. Hughes, Director of Public October 9, 2001 SUBJECT: Award of Construction Contract for th Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station, Proje PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Staff( PW01-21 to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining for authorize the City Manger to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders of $8,200.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract ~ BACKGROUND: On July 1,2001 the City of Temecula I the residents of Vail Ranch. On September 25, 2001, in an objective of a 5 minute Fire/Emergency Medical Response development of an interim Fire Station in the Vail Ranch are Station in the Wolf Creek Development are finalized. To accommodate the interim Fire Station, the approved grading, connections to utilities, and pavement in the parki APPROVAL l( CITY ATTORNEY ~ Jl DIRECTOR OF FINA-NCE.,~__z,.~ CITY MANAGER / II Works/City Engineer Site Grading & Paving No. PW01-21 Site Grading & Paving, Project No. a base amount of $82,000.00 and not to exceed the contingency amount mount. ~gan providing municipal services to effort to meet the City's general plan time citywide, Council approved the while the details for a permanent Fire re station site requires some minor and driving lanes. Because of the emergency nature of this work the Public Works department ~olicited proposals from 3 contractors on the City's list of approved general contractors, per the C~ty s informal bdd ng procedures. Of the Three (3) proposals received, McLaughlin Engineering and Mining, Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder able to complete the necessary work in th~ accelerated time frame. Proposals were also received from Riverside Construction and Becker Engineering. McLaughlin Engineering & Mining has satisfactorily performed similar work for the City in the past. In order to expedite the project, the City manager executed a miscellaneous grading contract with McLaughlin in the amount of $24,000. The Site Grading and Paving contract encompa.sses all necessary site work including grading and will supercede the miscellaneous grading contract previously executed by the City Manager. The specifications require the contract to be comp eted no later than October 30, 2001. The Engineer's estimate for this work was $90,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The initial appropriation of $250,000, in account number 210-165-739-5804 is adequate to cover the cost of this work. The total constructio~ cost is $90,200, which includes the contract amount of $82,000.00 plus 10% contingency of $8,200.00. ATTACHMENT: Construction Contract 1 R:~AGENDA REPORTS~2001~IOOgt, PW0t .21 .awd.doc CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / FOR PROJECT NO. PW01-21 VAIL RANCH INTERIM FIRE STATION THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 9 day of October, 2001 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter refer~ed to as "CITY", and McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the considerati(; as follows: l.a. hereinafter named, mutually agree CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Con'ract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Schedule of Prices, PerformanCe Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. iPW01-21, VAIL RANCH INTERIM FIRE STATION, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Trahsportation Standard Specifications where specifically referenced in the Plans and Tec~3nical Specifications, end the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public!Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the J~)int Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American ,~lssociated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, and Special Provisions, for PROJECT NO. PW01-21, VAIL RANCH INTERIM FIRE STATION. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: incorporated Building New, 3055 Overland AvenueI Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will co.~Qntro/the generaJ provisions, construction materials and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, and Special Provision, for PROJECT NO. PW01-21, VAIL RANCH INTERIM FIRE STATION. the Stand rd 'f' ' In case of conflict between ~ alltake precedSpecmcati°ns nacned otvheer other Contract Documents, the other Contract Document sh e , and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of lhe work in general terms but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to b~ furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executin( the Contract. R:\BIO-OOCS~MASTERS\citycontract The Contract Documents are complementary, and, vhat is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict b~tween this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR sha perform everyth ng required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materals, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the fo ow ng: PROJECT NO. PW01-21, VAIL RANCH INTERIM FIRE STATION All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents here nabove enumerated and adopt?d by CITY. This contract shall supercede the previous contract "Miscellaneous Grading - Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station" executed by the City Manger. / / CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the d~recbon and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representabves. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. 'he CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment ~r, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: EIGHTY TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ant NO CENTS ($82,000.00). CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work prior io October 30m, 2001. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be a~proved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the C ty Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: A. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the C~ty Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the vanous portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public ~ontract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%)lof the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the th'rtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or anylpart thereof unencumbered shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR CONTRACT CA-2 R:\BID-OOCS\MASTER$\cit¥co~tract filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. C. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the ICity Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been~performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount Stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payment~ on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. / D. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 ~s hereby ~ncorporated b~ reference. / E. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Publi~ Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The Council h~reby delegates authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. / LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIMId. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees tolforfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each icalendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to becomeldue to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of tired and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in w Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage ra adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. C( provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1' :aused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is uest for payment under Paragraph iting, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTF ACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR ~)f each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to th~ payment CONTRACTOR shall be I ' required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each 'claim for payment. / PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the these rates are on file with the City City Clerk's office of Temecula. es at the job site and shall pay the )NTRACTOR shall comply with the '77.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Cod CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each cale laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less tl' CONTRACT CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the )dar day, or portion thereof, for each an the stipulated prevailing rates for R:\BID~DOCS~MAST E RS\cltycontract 10. 11. any work done under this Contract, by him or I: any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence ir~ this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and dam indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken o CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigati negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. liability, injuries, or death of persons ge to property, arising directly or out of the operations conducted by 3ns arising through the sole active The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY· 12. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that n~e~ther~ nor ~nv nf it~t ' ' ~tives has offered or given any gr~tuiiiestc~i~r;~is_;s..t~)nrnnlnu ¢,~ nnc~nt~_~.l..~,~e~r~,p~o~y~.~: agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 13. . warrar~ts that he has no blood or marriage CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONTRACTOR ' relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. / 14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City ~anager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that the~e are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an · I affidavit covering disputed claims or items ~n connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the Stale of California. 15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delayi?.g or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto!, to CITY. / 16. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's book~, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of t~is Contract shall at all reasonable t mes be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 17. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and ~:onstruction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CO~TRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilitie~ and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and CONTRACT , . CA-4 . R:\B D-DOCSWIASTE~$\citycontrac~ acceptance notwithstanding any payments or ot ~er prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time af :er completion of the work. / 18. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents th;t it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on ihe basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. ~ 19. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor under~tand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the mBnicipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. / / 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or e~nPloyee of the City of Temecula or ~ ~ bod~ll have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year' thereafter. / Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants an! agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of .Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, ~ full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Sectior~ 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. / / 21..-ADA-~ REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Coptractor certifies that the Contractor ~s ~n total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. CONTRACT CA-5 R:~BID-DOCS~',,IASTERS~tyconlmct 22. CONTRACT WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the sa~e in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: William G. Hughes, Director of Public City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 ~Vorks/City Engineer R:~BID-DOCS~4ASTERS~,itycon~act IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused ' date first above written. DATED: his Contract to be executed on the CONTRACTOR McLaughlin En.( ~neenng and Mining, Inc. 41934 Main St. No. 107 Temecula, Ca c~ 2590 Phone (909) 699-7957 ~. Wa~,n~ ~hite, Vice President DATED: ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CITY OF TEMECULA By: Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager CA-7 R:~BID-DOCS~IASTERS~ityconlmct PROJECT NO. PW01.2; VAIL RANCH INTERIM FIRE STATION SCHEDULE OF PRICES DESCRIFRON ESTIMATED Mobilization/Demobilization 1 ILS Earthwork/Grading Sewer Trench & Backfill 120 Water Line Trench & Backfill 140 Dry Utility Trench & Backfill 300 3" AC over 6" Agg. Base 9,850 3" AC over native 4,560 8" Reinforcecl PCC Slab 360 6' Chainlink Fence w/slats 5' wide Chainlink Gate 24' wide Rolling Chainlink Gate 360 I LF 1 AC Dike (City Std. No. 214) 435 Concrete Wheel Stop 11 8" PVC Crossover 64 Pavement Delineation 1 NPDES Compliance 1 [EA UNIT PRICE EX'TENDED AMOUNT 13,750.00 13,750.00 3;550;00 3,550.00 32.O0i 3,860.00 9.00 t,260.00 9.00 2,700.00 1.40 6,386.00 8.00 2,880.00 19.00 6,8~0.00 200.00 950.00 950.00 8.00 3,480.00 &0.O0 440.00 26.50 1,696.00 1,375.00 1,375.00 $10.000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNTOF BASE BID: E£~ht¥ T~O Thousand ($ 82,000.00 ) DOLLARS ANE CENTS ITEM 14 ORDINANCE NO. 01-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 81AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION 01-0129) o WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government C de provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regg general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Cc shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the cit~ lations by cities to implement such :le requires that a zoning ordinance and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly r 2001, and recommended that the City Council approve th Municipal Code; and ~ WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable and local ordinances; and, )ticed public hearing on August 15, following amendments to the City requirements of State law WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, / WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on September 11, 2001 to consider the proposed amendments to the Cit~/ Zoning Map and the Temecula Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendments To The City Municipal Code. The following minor code clarifications to Chapter 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows: u A. Amend Section 17.06.020.E read, "Medi m Density Residential (M). The medium density residential zoning district ~s ~ntended to prov de for the deve opment of attached and detached residential development. Typical housing types may include single-family, duplexes, triplexes, townhouses and patio homes, with a d~nsity range of 7 - 12 dwelling units per acre." B. Amend Section 17.06.020.F to read, "HighlDensity Residential (H). The high density residential zoning district is intended to provideI for the development of attached residential development. Typical housing types may include townhouses, stacked dwellings and apadments, with a density range of 13 - 20 dwelling units per acre." / C. Amend Section 17.06.040, Table 17.06.040, amend the portion with the heading "Minimum gross lot area (acres)" to read, "Minimum net lot a~ea (acres)". R:/Ords 2001/Ords 01-14 I D. Amend Tables 17.08.040A and B of Se(tion 17.08.040 to add superscript numeral 1 to the end of the heading to read, "Minimum requiied landscaped open space~''. / E. Amend Tables 17.08.040.A and B of Se(~tion 17.08.040 to include a notes section with a note that reads: "1. Minimum required landscaped open space area does not include the necessary planting within the right-of-way." F. Amend Section 17.08.070.C.2 to include an item d which reads, "Long unarticulated walls should be avoided. Wall planes should Inot extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty (50) feet without an offset or enhanced architecture articulation." G. Amend Section 17.24.040.E., to read, "Cc parking spaces shall not be allowed." H. Amend Section 17.24.050.H.6 to read, "All to vehicle parking spaces shall be protected and enclosed than 6 inches in height." I. Amend Section 17.28.600.C.l.e to read, "'1 he maximum duration for attached promotional signs during the first through third quarters (January through September) of the year ~s one thirty (30) day period per quarter, w~th a cons~cuhve sixty (60) day down penod, during which time promotional signs are not permitted. During the fourth quarter (October through December) promotional signs are permitted for two Ithirty (30) day periods provided that the temporary sign is down for at least thirty (30) days before the temporary signage is used again." J. Amend Section 17.34.010 to read, ""Lot coverage" means that portion of the lot that is covered by buildings and structures, which is deri~ acreage divided by the area covered by the footprint(s) of th Section 2. Amendments To The City Municipal error corrections to Chapters 8 and 17 of the Temecula Mu~ read as follows: mpact Car Parking. Compact car nterior landscaped islands adjacent in a 12 inch concrete curb no less ed as the quotient of the gross lot buildings or structures." Code. The following typographic licipal Code are hereby amended to A. Amend the first sentence of Section 8.16.060 to read, "If at the end of the time allowed for compliance in the original notice, or as extended in cases of appeal, or as specified by the board of appeals, compliance has not been accomplished, the officer issuing the notice or the agency of which he is an officer may order the hazardous vegetation to be removed by public officers or by employees of said agency, or may cause' removal to be carried out by a private contractor selected by the C~ty m accordance with applicable statutes and in the manner and under the terms specified by the City Council." ,, B. Amend the second sentence of Section 8.~16.060 to read, The cost of such removal accompanied by a reasonable administrative charge may be imposed as a special assessment upon the property, and such property shall be ~ubject to a special assessment lien for such purpose." "The approving authority may, upon an application being expiration, grant a time extension of one year (up to three el Section 17.05.010.H, amend the first sentence of the paragraph to read, filed within thirty days prior to the tensions may be granted)." R:/Ords 2001/Ords 01-14 2 read "Slope". Planning. Section 3. Section 17.080.060.C.5, modify th Section 17.24.040.A, amend the la., Severability. The City Council hereb first word in the first sentence to sentence by capitalizing Director of declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of dompetent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. Environmental Compliance An Environmental Checklist was prepared for th~s project to determ ne f the proposed amendments wou d resu t n any env~ronmenta ~mpacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmentalllmpact Report for the General Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared for the original Development Code. The Checklist indicated that the proposed amendments would not resultl in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the C~ty General Plan and the supplemental ana ysls prepared for the original Development Code. As a result, the Planning Commissioh recommends that the City Council make a determination that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the G~neral Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required. Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as requir~ Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the a, copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated pc Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, t~ Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a in said City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] shall certify to the adoption of this ,d by law. be in full force and effect thirty (30) Ioption of this Ordinance and cause sting places. and effect thirty (30) days after its )gether with the names of the City ~ewspaper published and circulated )f October, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor R:/Ords 2001/Ords 01-14 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of ['emecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01-14 was duly introduced anc placed upon its first reading at a regular rceeting of the City Council on the 25th day of Sept~ ,rcber, 2001 and that thereafter, said ofOrdinanCeoctober,Was2001,dUlYbyadoptedthe followingand passedvote: at a regular rceeting of the City Council on the 9th day AYES: 4 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Naggar, Pratl, Roberis, Comerchero NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: I COUNCIL MEMBERS: Stone ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None R:/Ords 2001 / Ords 01-14 4 Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk TEM CULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 APPROV/~,~'~- CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CIIY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director Community Service~--~ / October 9, 2001 / Community Services Recreation Brochure PREPARED BY: Julie Crowe-Pelletier, Recrea~ on Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Award contract to Graphics Unlimited Lithography for the preparation and printing of four (4) issues of the Community Services Recreation Brochure over a two (2) year period with a third (3) year option to renew. The cost of printing the brochure is $39,t41 . o annually. 2. Approve a cont.ngenc/~ ~f 10 ~ ~r t~3,914 annually. DISCUSSION: equest or Proposal (RFP) was released by the City to solicit proposals for the development and professional production of the Community Services Recreation Brochure. The Winter/Spring issues will be distributed citywide to approximately 27,500 residences on November 30, 2001, November 29! 2002. The Summer/Fall issues will be distributed May 17, 2002, May 16, 2003. The brochur~ will include 32 pages with glossy, full color, seventy-weight pages. Serwces prowded wdl ~nclude design, camera-ready artwork, typesetting layout, final printing, and delivery to the U.S. Post Office for bulk direct mail delivery. / Request for Proposals (RFP) were sent to the following s!x professionals in Temecula: / Graphics Unlimited Lithography Minuteman Press Rancho Graphics (6) qualified printing and graphic Maurice Printers Quickset Printing Winning Colors In addition, a Public Notice was submitted to the local newspaper and information was made available through the City's website informing potential pr nting and graphic professionals that the City was seeking printing and graphic services. Staff received one proposal from Graphics Unlimited Lithography. Based upon vendor's previous experience with the City, th ability to meet projected deadlines, R:\CROWF3/AGENDASIBROCH URE AGN2001 doc the superior quality of printing, and overall cost, staff is r~commending award of the contract to Graphics Unlimited Lithography. Staff has worked witl~ Graphics Unlimited Lithography on several previous projects and has been completely satisfied with their work performance. In addition, the Community Services Department has receive awards for recreation brochures that were produced by ~ FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to produce two (2 in fiscal year 01-02 is $39,141, plus a 10% contingency, of seventy-one cents per issue, per Temecula residence. account #190~180-999-5222· R:ICROWEJ\AGENDAS\BROCH URE. AGN200 l.dcc d five previous statewide recognition ~raphics Unlimited Lithography. issues of the Recreation Brochure · This cost reflects an expenditure Unencumbered funds exist in REDEVELOPM NT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SEPTEMBER 25, 200'1 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment ~gency was called to order at 8:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLLCALL PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBER: Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 11, 2001 2 Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements 2001; Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts Stone Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. 30, 2001 for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2.2 Increase the revenue estimates for proper1 ax increment in the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund ($95,100) and Debt Service Fund ($379,399); 2.3 Approve an appropriation of $202,244 to th I h e pass t rough agreement line item in the Debt Service Fund. MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve ~onsent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and ~'. T--he motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Agency Member stone who was absent. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comments. R:\Minutes.rda\092501 ADJOURNMENT At 8:01 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, October 9, 2001, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes.rda\092501 2 Ron Roberts, Chairman ITEM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim O' Grady, Assistant City Man October 9, 2001 Inland Empire Airports First APPROVAL ~ITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~I~CE :ITY MANAGER ~ger Aaron Adams, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide dire( of support for the development of March Airpod and other BACKGROUND: Staff has spoken with Mr. Knox of March Inland Cargo Port and is seeking support for March, Airports to be further developed. Mr. Knox will present a brief 10-minute presentation that has tion to staff on taking a formal position lland Empire Airports Harley-Knox who is a developer for the ~,irport as well as other Inland Empire been previously shared with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), both of which have adopted resolutions of support. Mr. Knox is seeking support through such resolutions that encourage the development of March, Ontario, San Be~ relieve further expansion needs for LAX. Attached is a draft of a resolution of support that outlines prir development organizations and regional planning agencies aviation needs by encouraging and fostering commercial p; nardino and Palm Springs Airports to ciples for working with local economic to satisfy Southern California's future lssenger and cargo service at Inland Empire Airports. If the City Council is inclined to support such a position, staff will schedule formal action and consideration for the next City Council meeting. !Staff would also recommend that the resolution include support for extending the runway at French' Va ey to further facilitate small jet traffic at this airport. ,, ,, Jurisdictions who recently approved a resolution of support for inland Empire Airports First include: The c t'es of Hemet, Moreno Valley, Perris, Riverside, V~ctorVi e, Hemet/San Antonio Action Group, Western Riverside Council of Governments, March Joint ~owers Authority, Greater Riverside Chambers of Commerce, Fontana Chamber of CoTTer;e, Valley Group, and the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties. FISCAL IMPACT: None. DRAFT Statement of Principles For Airport Capacity Enhancement in Southern California WHEREAS the Southern California area including. Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties i~ served by more commercial airports than any other major metropolitan area in t~e United States; and WHEREAS available Southern California Airports include: Los Angeles International Airport, Burbank Airport, Long Beach Airport, Ontario International Airport, Orange County Airport, Palmdale Airport, IMarch GlobalPort, San Bernardino international Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, and Palm Springs Regional Airport; and WHEREAS the greatest population growth i~ Southern California during the coming centuries will occur m the Inland Empire C ~unties of Riverside and San Bernardino; and WHEREAS Los Angeles International Airpcrt, Burbank Airport, Long Beach Airport, and Orange County Airport are all 1 )cated in highly urbanized areas where environmental concerns and community resistance make further expansion difficult; and WHEREAS March GlobalPort, San Bernard5 no International Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, Ontario Inte~ national Airport and Palm Springs Regional are well located to serve future Sc,uthern California aviation needs and have great unused capacity; and WHEREAS the communities near Ontario Airport, March GlobalPort, San Bernardino International Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, and Palm Springs Regional Airport are supportive of those ai~ports~ and would greatly benefit from the increased use of those facilities; and / WHEREAS increasing freeway traffic into O~ange and LA counties will ground access to coastal airports extremely difficult and attempts to mitigate make the surface access challenges to these airports will siphon off transportation dollars that otherwise could be used to solve traffic challenges in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. t NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED tha favors and supports the development and utilization of well-located aviation facilities available at Southern California Logistics Airport, Ontario International Airport, M~rch GlobalPort, San Bernardino International Airport and Palm Springs P. egional Airport; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the undersigned growth in Southern California air traffic should be. neighboring communities are supportive; and BE IT FURTHER RESLOVED that it is goo traffic to airports with excess capacity rather than expand capacity in highly populated areas; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that regiona] their energies on improving surface transportation and population centers; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that agrees to work with local economic development organization and regional planning ag encies to satisfy Southern California's future aviation needs by encouraging nd fostering commercial I · passenger and cargo service at San Bemardino Intemanonal Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, Ontario International kirport, March GlobalPort, and Palm Springs Regional Airport. agree that future tirected to airports where ~1 public policy to direct air )ending billions of dollars to )lanning agencies should focus inks among existing airports ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager~''' October 9, 2001 Appointment of Members to the General (Continued from September 25, 2001) David Hogan, Senior Planner APPROVAL CITYATTORNEY DIR.OFFINANCE CITY MANAGER lan Community Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council appoint the remaining members of the Genera P an Commun ty Adv sory Committee. BACKGROUND T t . . : o assis in the process or updating the General Plan, the City Council approved staffs recommendation for a Community Advisory Committee at its June 12, 2001 meeting. The Resolution creating the Advisory Committee wa~ approved at the September 25, 2001 meeting. Resolution 01-97 established the Community Advisory Committee consisting of the following: 1 Planning Commissioner I Public Traffic Safety Commissioner 1 Community Services Commissioner 1 Representative of the Chamber of Commerce (to bE appointed by the Chamber of Commerce) 1. Representative of the Economic Development Coun ;il (to be appointed by the Economic Development Council) 1 Representative of a local environmental or community organization (as determined by the City Council) I 5 City residents (one appointed by each Council member) At the September 25th Council meeting, the four Councilmembers present appointed their resident representatives. Councilmember Stone was unable to attend the meeting and will need to appoint his representative at this meeting. In add~bon, the Councdmembers present were unable to agree upon the appointment of the local environmental or community organ~zabon representabve. As a result, th~s member of the Commumty Adwsory Comm ttee still needs to be appointed. R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee~Advisory Committee Appointments CC3.doc 1 A list of the appointed and remaining members is listed bel°w: Organ zat on ! Representative Planning Commission David Matthewson Public Traffic Safety Commission Darreli Connerton Community Services Commission Jame~ Meyler _ _ Chamber of Commerce To be ~ppointed by CCC Board Economic Development Corporation To be ~ppointed by EDC Board Community or Environmental Organization To be determined by City Council Member appointed by Mayor Comerehero Greg I~1orrison Member appointed by Councilmember Naggar Mark Broderick Member appointed by Councilmember Pratt Michelle Anderson Member appointed by Councilmember Roberts Paul JAcobs Member appointed by Councilmember Stone To be ~amed by Councilmember Stone St ff d th t^ I b "t I th I t t t th - A a recommen s a ~ouncimem er~oneseec isrepresenaive o e~ommunity dvisory Committee and that a majority of the Council identify th~ local community or environmental organization member to serve on the CAC. Once these appointments are made, staff will work with the General Plan Update consultant to begin the process. R:\GENPLAN\Cornp Plan Update\Comrnunity Advisory Cornmittee~Advisory Cornmittee Appointments CC3.doc 2 ITEM 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECUL/~ AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council James B. O'Grady, Assistant City Manager October 9, 2001 Disaster Relief for the American Red Cross- PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Aaron Adams, Sr. Management That the City Council provide APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~ :~equested by Councilman Stone ~nalyst rection to staff regarding a $25,000 donation to the American Red Cross to assist with the disaster relief effort for the victims of September 11, 2001. BACKGROUND: Councilmember Stone has requested that the City Council consider donating $25,000 ' ' ~ .... to the American Red Cross for d~saster rehef to assist ~n the tragic events that took place on September 11, 2001. Typically such expenditure cannot be made outside the has advised staff that Government Section code 53021 expenditure due to acts of sabotage or war. Should the City council elect to make such a donation, it earmarked specifically to aid the victims of this tragedy. FISCAL IMPACT: With the adoption of the current ye; budget, $167,500 was approved by the City Council for Community Services funding to fund this request; therefore, adequate funds are available in the Community Services line item of the Cit Council budget. ty limits, however; the City Attorney ermits local agencies to make such recommended that this donation be R:~DAMSA\CO U NCIL/Disastec Relie1911 dcc