Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout092501 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title Ill AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COU A REGULAR MEETII CITY COUNCIL CHAMI 43200 BUSINESS PARK SEPTEMBER 25, 20 At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. -Closed ,Session of the City Gc Sections: 1. Conference with Real Property fVegot Negotiation Parties: Temeka Adverbs negotiation: Terms and conditions of a- property interests with Temeka~Advertising 2. Conference with City Attorney and legal coui Section 54956.9(b)(1) with respect to two ma' respect to such matters, the City Attorney h< reached where there is a significant exposur on existing-factsand circumstances and the litigation. 3: Conference with City Attorney-and egal cou with CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: R:\Agenda\092501 concerning .existing Riga y, reviewing the. publicdoc Mayor Jeff Comerchero Mathew Kim and Oliver and Rabbi Yitzchok Hurwitz, Councilman Naggar it pursuant to Government Gode Property: 42380 Zevo Drive; and. :City. of Temecula; Under elopment agreement affecting real pursuant to Government Code. of,pQtential' litigation. With termined that apoint^has-been litigation involving the'City based will decide whether to initiate 1sel pursuant to:`GOvernment Code riof existing.litigation-involving the 1) City of Temecula v. County of and various parties Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2001-14 Resolution: No.2001-83 Koughlin of Temecula Valley 1 ROLL CALL: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Fall Rod Run Presentation Fire Prevention Week Presentation Bovs and Girls Club Presentation Inland Emoire Race for the Cure Month Proud American Citv Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the items that appear within the Consent Calendar or on Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or ; pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out ai When you are called to speak, please come forward public may address the Council on 's that are not listed on the agenda. tesire to speak to the Council on matter not listed on the agenda, a d filed with the City Clerk. state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business mattes on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk rp IOr to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be Members of the City Council request specific Calendar for separate action. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all agenda. R:\Agenda\092501 tiered to be routine and all will cussion of these items unless be removed from the Consent and resolutions included in the 2 Resolution approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A ~ 3 4 5 6 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the minutes of July 17, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the comment letter for transmittal to Commission. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the comment letter for transmittal to Commission. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN EASEMEI MEANDERING SIDEWALK ALONG WINCH PORTIONS WITHIN PARCEL N0. 13 OF 21383 AS REQUIRED PER THE GONDITIC FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-I Riverside County Transportation Riverside County Planning OF THE CITY OF f DEED FOR A STER ROAD WITH PARCEL MAP N0. IS OF APPROVAL R:Wgenda\092501 3 7 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.01- 8 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING JEFFREY HEIGHTS ROAD AND A PORTION OF CALLE GIRASOL INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 14493) Knuckle RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29406 in conformance 8.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreeme Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as 8.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement security for the agreement. RECOMMENDATION: th the conditions of approval; and accept the Faithful ;urity for the agreement; d accept the Monument Bond as 9.1 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract changes with T.Y. Lin International for an additional amount of $35,000 above the previously approved 10% contingency for the Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project. 10 Purchase of Citv Eouioment RECOMMENDATION: 11 10.1 Approve the purchase of the vibratory roller anc Rand Equipment Sales for $26,916.93. PW97-15SW RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Accept the Pala Road Bridge Soundwall Project complete; trailer from Ingersoll- Project No. PW97-15SW - as R:Wgenda\092501 4 11.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Perforr Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the 12 11.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven Completion, if no liens have been filed. Activity Area RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION N0.01;--_ Bond, and accept aone-year after filing of the Notice of A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT 28820 AND 28835 SINGLE OAK DRIVE AS A NO SKATEBOARDING, ROLLERBLADING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY AREA PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 10.36 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE 13 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the location of the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station; 13.2 Approve an appropriation of $562,000 from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance for Fire Department staffing costs for the interim station. 14 Interim Fire Station Residential Facility RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the purchase of the residential module i Manufactured Housing Company for a total amoi RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCH THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SER' AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELC rim Fire Station from San Diego of $34,240.00. :D MEETINGS OF DISTRICT ENT AGENCY F:\Agenda\092501 5 ~.~ Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2001-15 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, PUBLIC COMMENTS Pratt, Roberts, Stone A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward ;and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Di. "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. come forward and state vour name and addree DISTRICT BUSINESS 1 S.M.A.R.T. Program Presentation RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and file the report and video press Activities and Recreation in Temecula (S.M DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS should present a completed pink i you are called to speak, please :ion regarding the Summer Months i.T.) Program. R:\Agenda\092507 6 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, October 9, 2001, 7:00 PM Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\092501 Council Chambers, 43200 Business r~~~~~~.txt+~*'+++fr~+rv~'ww*++~wa~~~~.' Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2001-06 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Chairperson Ron Roberts AGENCY MEMBERS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward 'and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Dii "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. come forward and state vour name and addres CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 11, 2 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for 2001; should present a completed pink i you are called to speak, please Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2.2 Increase the revenue estimates for property tax increment in the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund ($95,100) and Debt Service Fund ($379,399); 2.3 Approve an appropriation of $202,244 to the the Debt Service Fund. R:\P,genda\092501 8 agreement line item in DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, October 9, 2001, City Drive, Temecula, California. R:Wgenda\092501 Chambers, 43200 Business Park RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City may appear and be heard in support of or in opposit at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of limited to raising only those issues you or someone in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk 15 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance ORDINANCE N0.01 ouncil before a public Hearing or i to the Approval of the project(s) project(s) in court, you may be se raised at the public hearing or or prior to, the public hearing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS B AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE TYPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0120) 16 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE~CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0.944-330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0451) COUNCIL BUSINESS 17 Butterfield Stage Road/CETAP Corridors RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Receive and file report. R:Vlgenda\092501 10 18 Proposed Urban Limit Line RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN URBAN LIMIT LINE FOR THE EAST AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA'S PLANNING AREA TO IMPLEMENT THE GENERAL PLAN 19 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.01- A RESOLUTION OF THE .CITY .COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CREATING THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND SETTING FORTH THEIR DUTIES AND TERMS 19.2 Appoint the remaining members of the General Committee. 20 Future Citv Hall Site Selection RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Appoint an ad-hoc committee to participate in City Hall; 20.2 Provide direction to staff to prepare a Request consultant to lead this selection process. 21 Consideration of Increased Bus Service for Temecula (at the request of Councilman Pratt) RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Provide direction to staff regarding the possible i Temecula. R:Wgenda\092501 11 Community Advisory site selection process for a future r Qualifications (RFO) to hire a in bus service for DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, October 9, Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Calif at 7:00 P.M., City Council R:Wgenda\092501 12 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ~ ~~ ~ ~ .J N ~ •°-~ ~ a~ y ~ ~ ~, a '.r '~ ~ o. `~° '~ N N C N ~+ y ~ N W Q O ~~ i.y ~. O C O ~ y ~ a> C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ b N ,~ 'b 'b ~" C. >, /off `° ~ 1+1 .~ ~ ~ C~ ~' ~ o •~ on ~ o ~ ~ ~ o. `~' ~ b 'b ~ ~ T o ~ ~ a~~~." ~"r ~ a`i ~ '~ U °~° y ~ C3. O G' .+ ~ N YO, ~1 r~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'tw O ~ ~ .b ~ y ~ F" ~O/ tr ; N ~ O ~..~ I~1 G O ,y~ N ~G ~ a.1 ICI N .~ U '""~ 3 W ~ ~ ~ ~ O N '~ O Lti ~ U a~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ R. C ~ U .~ T ~ ~ ~~~ o d a~ '> oo b o v~ o v~ .~ > vi C7 Gd i W ~ ~ W ~ W ,~ W ~ ~ W abi 3~, ~ ° > 3~ o ~.~ b~ b b cO U O o ~ ¢ ~ ~ o ~ ~ O w •3 ai o ~ ~ •;; w U ~ '..ter ~ U o 0 C •~ U ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ o ~~ ~ '~ O w y ~-: c~ ~ U .C A p ... O ~ O ~ U O O i~' ~ U ~ 7V-i U O ~ O Q ~ U ~' w .~ w° ti ~ ~ ~-i b Uj N ~ ^WJ w 0 F ~ o W f~: °o F wN 3 x ,~ c 3 z 0 U •~ i•i F+~~I n n r ~--i d ~ ro ~ ~ ~~ U o y O ~' U a~i H °O ~ .~ ~ N , ~ N > ~' p c ~+~ A ti ~v ~ Y U H Y W ~ ~ O N ~ cC ~ c ' ~ ~ ~b ~ ~ .'~.~ 'b N ~ ti ~ ~ a s 4A V ,~ „Hy ~ k 3 w b z s p ° o ~ C ~ o , ~ ~ •N 3 ~ ~ rTi ~ '~ N U ~ O ~ W C O. b ~ ~ .~ O ~ U 0 a~ o z ~ ~ ~ ~ cd U T~ N H U ~ y ~ ~ ~ W ~ 00 c FC b ~ ~ ." U ~ "i ~" ~ ~-+ ~ N C. :3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ i ~ w > o , , G ;~ ~ ~/'~ p ~ w ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ o O 3 ~ ° ' ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ,~ „ .~ U 1~1 ~ 3 -d o a ~ ~ ~ [...~ ~ o o . ° U o ap a •~ ,~ `~ w ~ ~ a~ 'ti ~ W ~ ~ ~ y a i H ~ `b ~ ~ ~° ~ o ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ o ~ o O ~, ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ v ' ~ '~ , ~ ~ j ~ .~ C••~ ~ O ~ ~ C ~ Y ~ ~ ^ ^.. 000 ~ cd ~+ -d N . t a i ~ O L w . , N ~ c d O ~+ ~ p„ ~ ~, ~y R C, cC rn U ~ ~ • y N b of ~ N S, ti 'b ~ y N ~ td ..r ~ ° v~ ~ '~ '~ `~ rn ° O ~ n. ~ ~ , ° ° f a ~ „ ,~ 3 .c = ~ ,~ ~ .., o ~ .~ ~ W r, o d mo ' ~ d' .? b d' -d d' 3 x ~ W v W o o W a W ~ W a y a ~ e4 c 3 0 W 3 o 3 3 ~ o b ~ 3 .~ ° o ~ o z ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ -~ o 3 ° . 3 a U ~ F1 ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~--i U U y0 ~.~ O ~ ~" U t ~ O ~ U ~ Y ~ ~ ~ O U ~ o ~' ~. ~ ~ U ~ `~." ti ~ O ~ ~ ~ N 'V t rr 3bN ~~ti W z V ,b . b ~ ~ V z~~ ~~ A~ W Q ~~ •~ U N O 5~ 1~-~ O a C .n U b y ... .~ w ~ O ~ ~ ~j ~ G ~ ~ '"+ U O .b •~ ~ CU ~ U ~ ~ ~ N O ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ b Q cC ~„i ~ o '~ .~ ~ ~ ~ U ~~ ~ ~ O _ ~ t~i~ o ~ °' b ' ~i a ~ ~U+ C F" O U ~ ~ o ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ T c ~ .~ a~ a .~ o .~ ~ z ~ U o ~ ~ ~ W O ,~ ~U .~ ~ ai vi vi vi vi i. ~ ~ w ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~.' 3 ~ ~ 3 i. F ~~ •~ • Ate, If• W1. Pq a ~° ~O o ~ ~ ~c~+ ~ ~ ctl ~" T ..+ p ~ U ~ ti o U U O ~ N ~ ~ F. ~ ~ ~ o U ,, h v F w o ~ ~., :' .' ~ o ,~ ,.., i o ~ fTrU ~ c~O ~ ~ ~ ~ V1 W ~ w W O y x~a ~ 3~ ~yo ~ T O ~ ' U N 3 ~ ro i _~_ ~:,_ ITEM 1 ~:y ITEM 2 .~.rt _.. --- _ ~ . __ -~ RESOLUTION N0.01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: ~ Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,392,387.64. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 25~h resolution. of September, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2001/Resos O7- 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of - foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regu City of Temecula on the 25'"day of September, 2001 by the AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ~ecula, hereby do certify that the meeting of the City Council of the owing roll call vote: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Resos2007/Resos 01- 09/Ofi/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/13/07 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/25/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/13/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 09/25/01 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BV FUND CHECKS: CITY OF TE LIST OF DE $ 384,448.58 427,268.46 345,196.96 235,483.64 $ 1,392,387.64 001 GENERAL FUND $ 452,995.30 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 317,054.69 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 120,539.23 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 33,717.41 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 10 274.34 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D , 433.01 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 173,100.43 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 399.45 28D REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 6,305.97 300 INSURANCE FUND 6,937.13 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 11,164.60 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 2,006.52 340 FACILITIES 8,072.42 380 RDA- DEBT SERVICE 4,553.50 470 CFD 98-1 DEBT SVC FUND 7,350.00 100 GENERAL FUND $ 167,076.18 165 RDA-LOWMIOD SET ASIDE 3,941.30 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 44,925.72 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 61.54 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2 992 79 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 523.12 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 1,949.79 300 INSURANCE FUND 852.37 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 7 089 74 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 2,032.91 340 FACILITIES 403818 TOTAL BV FUND: PREPAR~FD~Y JAD,~.YONJCER„A¢000NyING SPECIALIST FINANCE CITY 1,156,904.00 235,483.64 $ 1,392,387.64 HEREBY CERTIFY ~HAT~THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. _, HEREBY CERTIFY HAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 CITY Of TEMECULA PAGE 7 09/06/01 08:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMWNT 001 GENERAL FUND 40,541.65 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 307,830.12 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 17,828.89 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 1.14 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 129.02 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 20.71 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 4,646.17 300 INSURANCE FUND 14.55 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2,365.12 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 49.75 340 FACILITIES 3,671.46 470 CfD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND 7,350.00 TOTAL 384,448.58 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 09/06/01 08:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 10830 08/30/01 003626 TEMECULA GARDENS LP LOAN AGREEMENT-MISSION VILL 10904 09/04/01 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL CFD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE PAYME 71272 08/31/01 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC EDEN CONF:PB/MV/MJ/TH:10/9- 71272 08/31/01 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC EDEN CON F: PB/MV/MJ/TH:10/9- 71275 09/06/01 001515 A SAP TRUCK,TRALTOR/F WEED ABATEMENT 922-110-014 71275 09/06/01 001515 ASAP TRULK,TRACTOR/F CREDIT: REVISED INVOICES 71276 09/06/01 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC OLD TWN BILLBOARD RENTAL 71277 09/06/01 001281 ALHAMBRA GRWP LDSCP DSCN SVCS:R.C.MEDIAN 71278 09/06/01 003520 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COM LICENSE FEE FOR OLD TWN EVE 71279 09/06/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVCS:MUSEUM 71279 09/06/01 001323 ARROWHEAD HATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVCS:MNTC FAC 71279 09/06/01 001323 ARROWHEAD HATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVC: CRC 71279 09/06/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVC:SNART PRG 71279 09/06/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVCS:CITY HAL 71280 09/06/01 BASALO, MIKE REFUND: POOL PASS 71281 09/06/01 BLUE HAVEN POOLS RE FUND: PERMIT OVRPMT B01-20: 71282 09/06/01 003126 BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 71283 09/06/01 004225 BURL SLONE COUNTRY MUSE ENTERTAINMENT:8/31 SUMMER Ni 71284 09/06/01 C A C E CODE ENFORCE SEM: SALAZAR:9/' 71285 09/06/01 000154 C S M f 0 ANN'L TRAIN SEM:RUDDELL:11/' 71286 09/06/01 000154 C S M F O APPLICATION FEE:BUDGET ANARI 71287 09/06/01 001249 CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV WORK ETHIC CF:9/20:YATES,GR1 71288 09/06/01 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC PROPANE GAS FOR PUBLIC WORK: 71288 09/06/01 001233 DANS FEED 8 SEED INC 2-SADDLE RACKS:MUSEUM 71288 09/06/01 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC SALES TAX 71289 09/06/01 DEl GAUD10, GERALDINE REFUND: TAKING CHARGE 71290 09/06/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/24 RUSH 71290 09/06/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/24 EBON 71290 09/06/01 001380 E 5 1 EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/24 HANSEN 71290 09/06/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/24 HANSEN 71290 09/06/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP N/E 08/24 OBMANN 71290 09/06/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/24 HEER ACCOUNT NUMBER iGE 165-199-811-5804 IT 470-1040 1 001-140-999-5261 1 320-199-999-5261 001-161-999-5440 001-161-999-5440 280-199-999-5362 OD 001-164-602-5412 TS 280-199-999-5362 190-185-999-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-183-999-5372 340-199-701-5250 190-186-4972 0 001-2660 190-183-999-5330 HT 280-199-999-5362 1 001-161-999-5261 5 001-140-999-5261 001-140-999-5226 JT 001-110-999-5261 001-164-601-5218 190-185-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 190-183-4982 001-161-999-5118 340-199-701-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-120-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 ~.: ITEM AMOUNT 305,000.00 7,350.00 1,050.00 350.00 238.00 144.97- 1,926.00 750.00 350.00 55.10 214.00 86.82 375.00 479.87 25.00 36.08 355.20 50.00 245.00 350.00 25.00 119.00 10.26 60.00 4.50 20.00 1,898.95 1,194.40 1,456.18 1,079.84 1,444.76 2,337.23 CHECK AMOUNT 305,000.00 7,350.00 1,400.00 93.03 1,926.00 750.00 350.00 1,210.79 25.00 36.08 355.20 50.00 245.00 350.00 25.00 119.00 74.76 20.00 9,411.36 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/06/01 08:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHELK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER GATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 71291 09/06/01 004608 E-KNONLEDGE GROUP INC SEXUAL HARASSMENT TRAINING 71292 09/06/01 EDWIN JAMES ASSOCIATES REFUND: OVRPMT LD01-101GR 71293 09/06/01 ELEMENT K JOURNALS SUBSCRIPTION:NINDOYS 2000 71294 09/06/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP CRED IT:OFF-SET INVOICE 298= 71294 09/06/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP CRC COLE LIGHTING N/SOCKET 71294 09/06/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SALES TAX 71295 09/06/01 003665 EMERITUS COMMUNICATIONS JUL LONG DISTANCE PHONE SV[ 71296 09/06/01 ESTOCH, JAMES REFUND:OVRPMT LD01-101GR 71297 09/06/01 000478 FAST SIGNS LETTERING-B8S CITY VEHICLE 71297 09/06/01 000478 FAST SIGNS SALES TAX 71298 09/06/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 71298 09/06/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 71298 09/06/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 71298 09/06/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 71298 09/06/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 71298 09/06/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 71298 09/06/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 71298 09/06/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 71299 09/06/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT:39545 LONG RI 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:LOPE2 MARKET 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:TEM POLICE DE 71300 09/06/07 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM: BEIJING 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:R.TEM REALTY 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:ALLSTATE INSU 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:A CLASSIC TOU 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:TALCOTT COMPA 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:EUROPEAN CAFE 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:RANCHO GRAPHI 71300 09/06/01 004178 FREEDgI SIGNS FAC IMPR PRGM:SAN DIEGO C.U 71301 09/06/01 002104 GRILL ROOM, THE DEPST:COMM RECOGNITION DINN 71302 09/06/01 GROUP TRAVEL SHON INC. ONTARIO TWRI SM TRADE SHON 71303 09/06/01 HEISER, PATRICIA RE FUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CARTOONI 71304 09/06/01 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 71305 09/06/01 004593 J & J SUPPLIES INSTALL SIGNAL BACK-UP SYSTi 71306 09/06/01 JEFFRIES, LISA M. REFUND: MOMS CLUB PICNIC PACE 2 ACCWNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 001-150-999-5261 340.00 340.00 001-163-4362 200.00 200.00 320-199-999-5228 139.00 139.00 190-182-999-5212 91.68- 190-182-999-5212 214.85 190-182-999-5212 16.11 139.28 320-199-999-5208 1,552.10 1,552.10 001-163-4372 150.00 150.00 001-162-999-5214 32.25 001-162-999-5214 1.01 33.26 001-161-999-5230 19.76 001-110-999-5230 14.82 001-150-999-5230 12.92 001-111-999-5230 28.53 001-161-999-5230 35.44 001-164-604-5230 16.06 001-163-999-5230 12.92 001-165-999-5230 28.65 169.10 165-199-999-5250 150.00 150.00 280-199-813-5804 267.00 280-199-813-5804 198.50 280-199-813-5804 188.50 280-199-813-5804 198.50 280-199-813-5804 188.50 280-199-813-5804 188.50 280-199-813-5804 188.50 280-199-813-5804 417.00 280-199-813.5804 217.00 280-199-813-5804 160.00 2,212.00 001-100-999-5265 255.00 255.00 001-111-999-5270 895.00 895.00 190-183-4982 48.00 48.00 190-186-999-5250 253.70 253.70 001-164-602-5250 2,550.00 2,550.00 190-183-4989 20.00 20.00 .`-_ _ -.. ~.._ ~~.- __ .v_~.-r .c_-~-.x_. _ _. _. VWCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 09/06/01 08:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER MANE DESCRIPTION 71307 09/06/01 KELLY, SUSAN REFUND: CPR/FIRST AID TRAIN 71308 09/06/07 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPL 71309 09/06/01 LANDES, VERONICA REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CARTOON[ 77370 09/06/01 000273 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMIS MEMBERSHIP DUES:GARY THORNH 71311 09/06/01 004741 MAINTEX INC MUSEUM CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 77311 09/06/07 004141 MAINTEX INC TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 71311 09/06/01 004147 MAINTEX INC CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 71311 09/06/01 004141 MAINTEX INC TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 71377 09/06/01 004147 MAINTEX INC SR CTR CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 71311 09/06/07 004147 MAINTEX [NC MAI NT FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPLE 77311 09/06/07 004141 MAINTEX INC MUSEUM CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 77311 09/06/01 004141 MAINTEX INC NAINT FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIE 71372 09/06/07 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 77313 09/06/01 001967 MANPONER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP N/E 8/79 LARKIN 71374 09/06/07 003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM: SEETO 71374 09/06/01 003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM: SEETO 71315 09/06/01 MASCARINA-V0, JUDITH RFND:YOUNG DISC.CLUB/TINY TI 71316 09/06/01 004107 MASSA-CAVITY, SANDRA 8/20-27/07 PLANNING CONSULT 77317 09/06/07 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 77378 09/06/07 MCAS MIRAMAR TI CKETS:MIRAMAR AIR SHOP:10, 71319 09/06/01 001905 MEYERS, DAVID NILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 71319 09/06/07 007905 MEYERS, DAVID NILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 77320 09/06/07 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:SALAZAR/URBII 71320 09/06/07 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 71320 09/06/07 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS: PAPAGOLOS/MCDERMOI 77320 09/06/01 007384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS. CARDS:DC/MV/RN/ZS/MC/JY 71320 09/06/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 71320 09/06/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS: KANI GONSKI 77320 09/06/01 007384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 71320 09/06/07 007384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:OLHASSO 77320 09/06/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 71320 09/06/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS CREDIT:BUS.CARDS/MCDERMOTT 71321 09/06/01 004586 MOORE FENCE COMPANY RES IMPRV PRGM: MUN02 71322 09/06/01 001986 MUZAK INC SEPT MUSIC BROADCAST:OLD TOH 71323 09/06/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT JUL DISPLAY AD:4TH OF JULY mJ ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-4982 330-199-999-5220 190-183-4982 001-161-999-5226 190-185-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 790-182-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 340-199-702-5212 190-785-999-5272 340-199-702-5212 190-183-999.5330 001-161-999-5118 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 190-183.4982 001-ibt-999-5248 190-183-999-5330 790-783-999-5350 190-183-999-5330 190-183.999-5330 007-ibi-999-5222 001-161-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-161-999-5222 001-167-999-5222 001-161-999-5222 001-767-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 165.199-813-5804 001-164-603-5250 190-180-999-5254 ITEM AMOUNT 48.00 13.89 24.00 75.00 14.58 59.88 61.78 45.28 45.28 45.28 45.28 45.28 644.00 516.00 1,320.00 250.00 97.00 1,679.73 345.60 697.00 820.00 300.00 79.50 5.96 213.20 238.50 33.88 39.75 2.98 106.60 7.99 114.60- 945.00 59.50 727.10 CHECK AMOUNT 48.00 13.89 24.00 75.00 362.64 644.00 576.00 1,570.00 97.00 1,679.73 345.60 697.00 1,120.00 613.76 945.00 59.50 127.10 VWCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 09/06/01 08:47 VWCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VWCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCWNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMWNT AMWNT 71324 09/06/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S FAX MACHINE FOR STN #84 001-171-999-5220 268.73 71324 09/06/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 35.84 71324 09/06/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S CREDIT:RETURNED ITEMS 001-167-999-5220 7.70- 71324 09/06/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-167-999-5220 3.37 71324 09/06/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 007-740-999-5220 74.76 71324 09/06/07 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 74.86 389.26 71325 09/06/01 002105 OLD TONN TIRE 8 SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINIj 007-161-999-5214 847.02 71325 09/06/01 002705 OLD TOWN TIRE 8 SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS 8 MAINZ 001-161-999-5214 723.53 964.55 77326 09/06/07 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES SEPT DUCK POND HATER MAINT S VC 190-780-999-5250 800.00 800.00 71327 09/06/07 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES 007-171-999-5377 86.57 71327 09/06/01 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES 001-171-999-5311 91.19 77327 09/06/01 003762 P M X MEDI CAI SPECIALTY RETURNED MEDIC SQUAD SUPPLI E S 007-171-999-5311 87.99- 89.77 77328 09/06/07 004463 PERFECT FORM BUSINESS S I CASH RECEIPTS FOR CITY CASHI ER 001-140-999-5222 7,337.00 71328 09/06/07 004463 PERFECT FORM BUSINESS S FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 35.91 77328 09/06/01 004463 PERFECT FORM BUSINESS S SALES TAX 007-140-999-5222 700.28 1,473.79 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-610-5260 12.98 77329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-2175 4.20 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 007-765-999-5260 77.07 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-783-999-5372 7.94 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5372 7.68 77329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY LASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5250 5.45 77329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 007-167-999-5260 75.00 77329 09/06/07 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999.5220 15.20 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASX PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 007-164-607-5260 15.00 77329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5260 28.52 77329 09/06/07 000249 PETTY CASH - PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 790-782-999-5242 38.64 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-182-999-5242 25.76 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 007-771-999-5215 5.35 77329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 007-771-999-5272 6.79 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 790-183-999-5320 17.00 77329 09/06/07 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 790-183-999-5340 27.00 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-783-999-5320 26.17 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 790-183-999-5320 72.48 77329 09/06/07 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 4.30 71329 09/06/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-117-999-5270 20.00 293.93 77330 09/06/01 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC JUL CELLULAR SVCS:SR VAN 190-180-999-5208 47.61 71330 09/06/07 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC JUL CELLULAR SVCS:CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 47.11 88.72 77337 09/06/07 000635 R 8 J PARTY PALACE CHAIR RENTAL•SMR NI GHTS:B/70 280-799-999-5362 48.50 48.50 71332 09/06/01 004453 R C ENTERPRISES FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 007-740-999-5220 35.00 77332 09/06/01 004453 R C ENTERPRISES SALES TAX 001-740-999-5220 2.63 37.63 71333 09/06/01 000907 RANCHO CAR HASH TCSD CITY VEHICLE CAR HASHES 190-180-999-5274 57.50 71333 09/06/01 000907 RANCHO CAR HASH FUEL FOR TCSD CITY VEHICLES 790-180-999-5263 23.28 80,78 VOUCHRE2 09/06/01 08:47 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME CITY OF TEMECULA VWCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 71334 09/06/01 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING MUSEUM EXHIBIT FIXTURE 71334 09/06/01 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING SALES TAX 71335 09/06/01 003591 71336 09/06/01 000266 71336 09/06/01 000266 71336 09/06/01 000266 71337 09/06/01 000353 71337 09/06/01 000353 71338 09/06/01 001365 71338 09/06/01 001365 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE R-O-W MAINTENANCE SERVICES RIGHTNAY SEPT EQUIP RENTAL-SMART/V. RIGHTNAY SEPT EQUIP RENTAL-SMART PR RIGHTNAY CRED IT:CORRECT BILL RATE RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR JUN PARKING CITATION ASSES RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR JUN PARKING CITATION ASSES RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN RENEW ANNUAL PERMIT:TCC RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN RENEN ANNUAL PERMIT:K.H.PA 71339 09/06/01 002940 RIVERSIDE CO OF (GIS SY GIS CONSULTING SERVICES 71340 09/06/01 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC PN STENCIL TRUCK SUPPLIES 71347 09/06/07 002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 71342 09/06/01 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI AUG PARK CUSTODIAL SERVICES 71342 09/06/01 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI AUG TES POOL CUSTODIAL SVCS 71342 09/06/01 003807 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI JUL-AUG PARK CUSTODIAL SVGS 71342 09/06/01 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI AUG 6TH ST CUSTODIAL SVCS 71343 09/06/07 SLEEPING BEAR PRESS 77344 09/06/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 71345 09/06/01 71345 09/06/01 71345 09/06/01 71345 09/06/01 71345 09/06/01 71345 09/06/01 71345 09/06/01 71345 09/06/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF ED ISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDI SON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF ED ISON "DESTRUCTIVE INSECTS" BOOK RECREATION SUPPLIES AUG 2-22-575-0876 VARIOUS M AUG 2-10-331-2153 TCC AUG 2-20-792-2444 VARIOUS M AUG 2-79-683-3255 FRONT ST AUG 2-19-683-3263 FRONT ST AUG 2-02-502-8077 MAINT FAC AUG 2-23-051-9399 MARG PED AUG 2-18-528-9980 SANTIAGO 71346 09/06/01 000519 SW TN COUNTY PEST CONTR CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SVCS 71346 09/06/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR CRC PEST CONTROL SERVICES 77346 09/06/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR TCC PEST CONTROL SERVICES 71346 09/06/01 000519 SWTH CWNTY PEST CONTR MAINT FAC PEST CONTROL SVCS 71346 09/06/01 000519 SOUTH CWNTY PEST CONTR SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL S1 71346 09/06/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR TES PEST CONTROL SERVICES 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 77347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 77347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM ACCOUNT NUMBER 790-185-999-5212 790-785-999-5212 007-164-601-5402 190-183-999-5372 190-783-999-5372 190-183-999-5372 007-2260 001-2265 790-784-999-5250 790-180-999-5250 007-161-610-5248 007-764-607-5278 190-183-999-5330 PAGE 5 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 41.31 3.10 44.41 3,000.00 3,000.00 133.25 110.75 83.06- 160.94 1,454.50 779.00 2,233.50 368.00 73.00 441.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 7r7.n 1n.n 756.00 756.00 190-180-999-5250 3,650.00 190-186-999-5250 210.00 190-180-999-5250 190.00 001-764-603-5250 210.00 190-180-999-5228 74.95 190-186-999-5301 247.74 190-180-999-5319 190-184-999-5240 190-180-999-5319 001-164-603-5319 001-164-603-5319 340-199-702-5240 190-180.999-5240 190-180-999-5319 347.09 7,045.42 152.01 560.24 371.81 1,154.79 74.92 39.39 340-199-701-5250 790-782-999-5250 790-784-999-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-181-999-5250 790-186-999-5250 007.2370 165-2370 190-2370 792-2370 793-2370 56.00 90.00 36.00 40.00 29.00 39.00 290.00 8,274.64 765.12 3,721.07 1.14 129.02 4,260.00 74.95 247.74 3,679.67 ~.«. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PACE b 09/06/01 08:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VWCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG NORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG YORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG NORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG YORKERS' COFIP PREMIUM 71347 09/06/01 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU AUG YORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 71348 09/06/01 000305 TARGET STORE PY OFFICE SUPPLIES 71348 09/06/01 000305 TARGET STORE PY OFFICE SUPPLIES 71348 09/06/01 000305 TARGET STORE PY OFFICE SUPPLIES 71349 09/06/01 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT CRC LOCKSMITH SERVICES 71350 09/06/01 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE PY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 71351 09/06/01 000854 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:35248:G.T~ 71352 09/06/01 004261 VERI20N CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-2676 GENERAL USAGE 71352 09/06/01 004261 VERI ZON CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-3526 FIRE ALARM 71352 09/06/01 004261 VER120N CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-9897 GENERAL USAGE 71353 09/06/01 YAITE, JUDY RE FUND: POOL PASS 71354 09/06/01 004595 NESTERN MUSEUMS ASSOCIA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:PARKER/OT1 71355 09/06/01 003607 XPECT FIRST AID CRC FIRST AID SUPPLIES 71356 09/06/01 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATIO PARAMEDIC EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 71356 09/06/01 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATIO PARAMEDIC EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 194-2370 20.71 280-2370 59.67 300-2370 14.55 320-2370 150.94 330-2370 35.86 340-2370 441.84 13,014.50 001-163-999.5220 13.93 001-165-999-5220 13.93 001-164-604-5220 13.93 41.79 190-182-999-5212 60.00 60.00 001-164-601-5218 316.05 316.05 001-161-999-5226 170.00 170.00 320-199-999-5208 24.89 320-199-999-5208 72.11 320-199-999-5208 76.08 173.08 190-186-4972 20.00 20.00 190-1990 125.00 125.00 190-182-999-5301 399.16 399.16 001-171-999-5311 338.37 001-171-999-5311 322.50 660.87 TOTAL CHECKS 384,448.58 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 15 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 228,795.20 165 RDA DEV- LOU/MOD SET ASIDE 8,693.57 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 99,302.34 792 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 33,716.27 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 10,145.32 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 412.30 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 23,005.57 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 2,520.10 300 INSURANCE FUND 957.08 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 8,799.48 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,956.77 340 FACILITIES 4,400.96 380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE 4,553.50 TOTAL 427,258.46 ... ~..~~. _ - _ .:a ti -gym VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 26243 09/73/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/07 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 26243 09/13/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS-PRE 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/73/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2130 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2090 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 ITEM AMOUNT 26,678.63 660.17 4,877.38 11.19 406.05 97.75 286.27 139.55 26.51 1,126.02 216.19 586.08 182.91 100.31 1.87 19.07 .OS 1.82 .36 .92 .46 3.72 1.39 2.65 158.61 123.68 119.01 41.22 8.13 55.47 54.51 140.69 31.24 .36 23.43 119.46 5.42 2.32 93.56 977.11- 3,142.39 254.63 1,142.00 84.87 97.00 244.06 1,594.12 468.53 555.90 4,806.83 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 35,427.32 s _ .....- _ -v~~.~ r ._ .._ .Y-~ ~.s ._. VWCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHELK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DES CRIPTION 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 NE LT HNET 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PC 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI 26307 09/13/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI 71357 09/10/01 004594 2 HOT ACT IVEUEAR T-SHIRT S/CAPS/PANTS: 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX(IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538728 09/13/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SD[ 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SD] 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SD[ 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 sol ACCWNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 190-2090 1,438.36 193-2090 59.18 194-2090 29.59 340-2090 768.95 001-2090 3,035.83 001-2090 4,638.41 190-2090 958.01 193-2090 244.62 340-2090. 144.45 001-2090 738.00 001-2090 4,050.33 190-2090 4.70 280-2090 1.41 001-2090 891.45 001-2090 170.75 001-2090 2,188.14 190-2090 166.98 31,919.49 001-171-999-5235 2,180.49 2,180.49 001-2070 26,813.07 165-2070 566.76 190-2070 6,238.66 192-2070 17.65 193-2070 380.11 194-2070 132.93 280-2070 253.81 300-2070 91.19 320-2070 1,173.76 330-2070 281.29 340-2070 544.88 001-2070 6,403.81 165-2070 157.22 190-2070 1,642.80 192-2070 2.62 193-2070 106.26 194-2070 22.30 280-2070 72.41 300-2070 32.51 320-2070 296.62 330-2070 73.60 340-2070 146.30 45,450.56 001-2070 107.87 165-2070 3.58 190-2070 159.60 193-2070 2.80 280-2070 .95 320-2070 8.41 330-2070 7.05 340-2070 3.00 .- _, «.vL s _-_._ _ ~ __ VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/13/01 10:57 VOUC HER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 538790 09/13/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/73/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 71360 09/13/01 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C A F L A C 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 003552 CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER EXP PROT EXP PROT EXP PROT HOSP IC STD STD STD STD STD 71361 09/13/01 004148 A T & T ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2330 190-2330 193-2330 194-2330 340-2330 001-2330 190-2330 320-2330 001-2330 001-2330 190-2330 193-2330 194-2330 340-2330 LONG DISTANCE SVCS: POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5208 71362 09/13/01 000745 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:POLICE I 71363 09/13/01 000116 A V P V[S[ON PLANS 000116 AVP 71363 09/13/01 000716 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 71363 09/13/01 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 71363 09/13/01 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 71363 09/13/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 71363 09/13/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 71363 09/13/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 71363 09/13/01 000116 AVP VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 71364 09/13/01 004246 ACME SCREEN PRINTING T-SHIRTS SOFTBALL ANAROS 71364 09/13/01 004246 ACME SCREEN PRINTING T-SHIRTS SOFTBALL AHARDS 71365 09/13/01 004507 AEGIS PROTECTION GROUP CRIME PREVENTION MANUAL-POLI 71366 09/13/01 002733 AlBAO, NANCY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 71367 09/13/01 004601 ALL THE KING'S FLAGS AMERICAN POLE SLEEVE FRINGE 71367 09/13/01 004601 ALL THE KING'S FLAGS CA POLE SLEEVE FRINGE 3 X 5 71367 09/13/01 004601 ALL THE KING'S FLAGS POLE 1 X 1 14" OAK JOINTED 71367 09/13/01 004601 ALL THE KING'S FLAGS SPEAR TOP OF CA FLAG POLE 001-170-999-5208 001-2310 165-2310 190-2310 793-2310 194-2310 280-2310 330-2310 340-2310 ITEM AMOUNT 7,249.64 146.92 1,399.26 5.65 89.93 41.61 57.52 22.01 257.42 67.51 177.58 357.70 14.34 14.34 4.78 14.34 128.30 55.80 27.90 17.50 566.40 155.20 9.60 3.20 20.80 144.71 308.16 706.03 17.60 89.03 5.58 1.68 5.86 5.58 42.23 190-187-999-5313 3,000.00 190-187-999-5313 617.38 001-170-999-5292 118.50 190-183-999-5330 1,608.00 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 56.00 51.70 64.50 15.70 PAGE 3 CHELK AMOUNT 9,746.31 1,390.20 144.71 308.16 873.59 3,617.38 118.50 1.608.00 _.::::. . 'T-a.-s_~~~ .,: ~- ~ _ _ VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 71367 09/13/01 004601 ALL THE KING'S FLAGS FREIGHT 71367 09/13/01 004601 ALL THE KING'S FLAGS SALES TAX 71368 09/13/01 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES DAY CAMP BUS TO L.B.AOUARIU 71369 09/13/01 001375 AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION ACIA SEM:HODSON/ARMSTRONG:1 71370 09/13/01 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHI P:DON NAZEN 71370 09/13/07 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHIP: GARY L. THORN HI 71370 09/13/01 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHIP:THOMAS THORNSLEY 71371 09/13/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV AUG MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:VARIOU 71371 09/13/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV AUG MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:VARIOU 71371 09/13/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV AUG MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:VARIOU 71371 09/13/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV AUC MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:VARIOU 71371 09/13/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV AUG MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:VARI OU 71371 09/13/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV AUG MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:VARIOU 71371 09/13/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV AUG UNIFORM RENTAL: PW MNTC 71371 09/13/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV AUG UNIFORMS RENTAL:TCSD 71372 09/13/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 8/18 SMITH/WY' 71372 09/13/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 8/25 SMITH/WY' 71372 09/13/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/18 CONTRER~ 71372 09/13/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/25 CONTRER~ 71373 09/13/01 003814 BALLREILH, MICHAE LA REIMB: PHOTOCOPY MACHINE DEMI 71374 09/13/01 BORDELON, KIM REFUND:SWIM LESSONS/TODDLER 71375 09/13/01 BORDEN, JANETTE RE FUND:7ENN[S-8EG JR. 71376 09/13/01 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA RE FUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-2' 71377 09/13/01 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES SEPT RESTROOM FAC RENTAL 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 77378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 0035s3 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003s53 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 LTD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003ss3 STD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-183-999-5340 6 001-163-999-5261 001-161-999-5226 001-161-999-5226 001-161-999-5226 340-199-701-5250 340-199-702-52s0 190-181-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 190-185-999-52s0 001-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 f 001-162-999-5718 ' 001-162-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-120-999-5260 190-186-4970 190-183-4982 190-2900 280-199-999-5234 001-2380 165-2380 190-2380 192-2380 193-2380 194-2380 280-2380 300-2380 320-2380 330-2380 340-2380 001-2500 765-2500 190-2500 192-2500 193-2500 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 9.6s 15.93 233.48 513.28 513.28 278.00 278.00 227.00 429.00 195.00 851.00 119.25 42.75 64.20 105.30 46.20 39.55 11s.1o 87.50 852.80 924.95 93.60 187.20 53.00 55.00 50.00 100.00 826.00 1,590.53 39.10 299.92 .71 26.38 6.08 17.29 7.99 66.99 13.45 37.67 2,220.09 54.57 418.65 .99 36.81 619.85 2,058.55 53.00 55.00 50.00 100.00 826.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DES CRIPTION 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71378 09/73/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71378 09/13/01 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71378 09/13/07 003553 C I G N A 003553 STD 71380 09/13/01 000154 C S M F O APPLICATION FEE:BUDGET 71381 09/13/01 003138 71382 09/13/01 000128 71383 09/13/01 000413 71384 09/13/01 002520 71384 09/13/01 002520 71385 09/13/01 004228 CAL MAT CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GA CALIFORNIA T'S SCREENPR CALIFORNIA T'S SCREENPR CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS POLICY RENEWAL:J.O'GRADY PERMIT 1601 :SILT REMOVAL UNIFORM SHIRTS:PW MNTC CI SALES TAX RECREATION SUPPLIES:TCC 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/73/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/07 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA L[FE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71366 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA L[FE ASSURANCE C 003554 71386 09/13/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD8D AD&D AD&D AD&D AD&D ADBD AD80 AD&D AD&D AD&D AD80 LIFE INS LIFE [NS LIFE INS LIFE INS LIFE INS LIFE INS L[FE INS LIFE INS LIfE INS LIFE INS LIFE INS 71387 09/13/01 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY I CLAM ADJUSTER SERVICES 71387 09/13/01 000131 CARL WARREN 8 COMPANY I CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES 71388 09/13/01 002534 CATERERS CAFE 71389 09/13/01 003997 COAST RECREATION [NL 71389 09/13/01 003997 COAST RECREATION INL 71389 09/13/01 003997 COAST RECREATION INC RE FRESHMENTS:EMPLOYEE TRAIN II VAIL RANCH PK REPLACEMENT FREIGHT SALES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 194-2500 280-2500 300-2500 320-2500 330-2500 340-2500 001-140-999-5226 007-164-601-5218 300-199-999-5200 001-164-604-5271 001-164-607-5243 001-164-601-5243 190-184-999-5301 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 ITEM AMOUNT 8.49 24.75 11.15 93.49 18.78 52.59 25.00 1,208.89 350.00 154.00 468.00 35.10 25.70 148.88 3.01 30.76 .08 2.93 .59 1.49 .74 6.00 2.25 4.27 645.13 13.01 133.27 .33 12.68 2.59 6.49 3.24 26.00 9.75 18.51 300-199-999-5205 20.66 300-199-999-5205 136.66 001-150-999-5261 225.00 190-180-999-5212 260.00 190-180-999-5212 30.00 190-180-999-5212 19.50 CHECK AMOUNT 5,045.87 25.00 1,208.89 350.00 154.00 503.10 25.70 1,072.00 157.32 225.00 r _- VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 71389 09/13/01 003997 COAST RECREATION INC VAIL RANCH-PK SWING SEATS 190-780-999-5272 540.00 71389 09/13/01 003997 COAST RECREATION INC SLASH PROOF BELT SWING SEAT 190-180-999-5212 276.00 71389 09/13/01 003997 COAST RECREATION INC FREIGHT 190-780-999-5212 80.00 77389 09/13/01 003997 COAST RECREATION INC SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 56.70 1,202.20 71390 09/13/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 001-2120 123.50 77390 09/13/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 190-2120 5.60 77390 09/13/07 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 193-2720 .60 77390 09/13/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 794-2120 -2p 71390 09/13/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 330-2120 5.50 71390 09/13/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 340-2720 ,60 136.00 71391 09/73/07 001193 COMP U S A INC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES-INF iYS 320-199-999-5242 728.69 128.69 71392 09/13/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS OCT/NOV/DEC:ALARM MONITORING 340-799-701-5250 210.00 77392 09/13/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS OCT/NOV/DEC:ALARM MONITORING 340-799-702-5250 735.00 71392 09/13/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS OCT/NOV/DEC:ALARM MONITORING 001-164-603-5250 75.00 71392 09/13/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS OCT/NOV/DEC:ALARM MONITORING 190-185-999-5250 135.00 71392 09/13/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS OCT/NOV/DEC:ALARM MONITORING 190-785-999-5250 111.00 77392 09/73/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS OCT/NOV/DEC:ALARM MONITORING 190-187-999-5250 135.00 71392 09/13/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS OCT/NOV/DEC:ALARM MONITORING 190-182-999-5250 246.00 71392 09/13/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS OCT/NOV/DEC:ALARM MONITORING 790-788-999-5250 246.00 7,293.00 71393 09/13/01 004579 DON SIDELL 8 ASSOCIATES AUG PROF SVCS:LHAPARRAL POOL 210-190-170-5804 4,348.50 77393 09/73/01 004579 DON SIDELL 8 ASSOCIATES AUG PROF SVC:CHAPARRAL POOL 210-190-170-5804 507.00 4,855.50 71394 09/13/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-780-999-5263 486.82 77394 09/13/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR C[TY VEHICLES 007-763-999-5263 44.88 71394 09/13/01 004792 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-999-5263 175.89 71394 09/13/01 004792 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 213.08 71394 09/73/07 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 007-165-999-5263 182.16 71394 09/13/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5263 557.80 1,660.63 77395 09/13/07 007380 E S [ EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 07/27 THURSTON 190-786-999-5718 1,465.60 77395 09/73/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/70 THURSTON 190-786-999-5778 1,465.60 71395 09/13/07 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 07/27 VOSHALL 007-767-999-5178 2,289.21 71395 09/13/01 001380 E S 1 EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 07/27 NAASEH 001-161-999-5118 2,711.23 71395 09/13/01 001380 E S [ EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 07/27 NAASEH 001-161-999-5118 12,800.82 71395 09/73/01 007380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/70 VOSHALL 007-161-999-5778 2,464.30 71395 09/13/07 007380 E 5 I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/10 NAASEH 001-161-999-5118 16,895.66 71395 09/13/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/24 MCCOY 007-761-999-5778 2,607.20 42,699.62 71396 09/13/01 ESCH, DAVID RE FUND:PARENT/ME SWIM LESSONS 790-186-4970 25.00 25.00 71397 09/13/01 ESCH, ELAINA REFUND: LEVEL 3 SWIM LESSONS 190-186-4970 55.00 55.00 71398 09/13/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI 8 CATERIN RE FRESHMENTS:000NCIL MTG 08/30 001-100-999-5260 262.09 71398 09/13/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN RE FRESHMENTS:SUB-COMMITTEE MTG 210-190-173-5802 61.99 71398 09/13/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN REFRESHMENTS:SUB-COMMITTEE MTG 210-190-173-5802 61.98 71398 09/73/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN RE FRESHMENT:SUB-COMMITTEE MTG 210-190-165-5802 53.05 71398 09/13/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN RE FRESHMENT:SUB-COMMITTEE MTG 270-190-765-5802 53.05 492.16 .ti_. _ ..... ,...~ ,r'~-ate. _...~^~s~ ~ _~ ~ . '~~~z-"-. VWCHRE2 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 71399 09/13/01 003959 EVERETT 8 EVERETT PAINT RES IMPR PRGM:MUNOZ, MARI 77400 09/13/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 71400 09/13/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 71400 09/13/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 71400 09/13/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 71401 09/13/01 FAMILY FUN 71402 09/13/01 000478 FAST SIGNS CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION JUL LDSCP REPAIR:YNEZ/SANT AUG LDSCP IMPR:PALA PARK AUG LDSCP IMPR:HI GHWAY 79S AUG LDSCP IMPR:HI GHWAY 795 SUBSCRI PT[ON: FAMILY FUN TEMP LETTERS:MUSEUM EXHIBIT ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-199-813-5804 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5228 190-185-999-5301 001-165-999-5230 71403 09/13/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 71404 09/13/07 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 71404 09/13/01 003347 003347 003347 003347 003347 003347 003347 003347 003347 003347 003347 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTEA FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 71405 09/13/01 004239 FISHER MERRIMAN BENGAL 71405 09/13/01 004239 FISHER MERRIMAN BENGAL 71406 09/13/01 GARRIDO, NOEL 4,012.07 16,500.00 55.00 71407 09/13/01 004455 GATEWAY COMPUTERS 2 GATEWAY COMPUTER: POLI CE DEB T 001-170-999-5604 2,721.00 71407 09/13/01 004455 GATEWAY COMPUTERS FREIGHT 001-170-999-5604 160.00 71407 09/13/01 004455 GATEWAY COMPUTERS SALES TAX 001-170-999-5604 213.06 3,094.06 71408 09/13/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-C.M. 001-110-999-5220 282.31 71408 09/13/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY CL RK 001-120-999-5277 799.42 71408 09/13/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE 007-140-999-5220 254.61 71408 09/13/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-H.R. 001-150-999-5220 32.90 71408 09/13/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-68S 001-162-999-5220 399.37 71408 09/13/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OffICE SUPPLIES-EGO REV EL 001-771-999-5220 60.62 1,229.23 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES XX-9277 ROBERTS,R:MAYOR CON XX-2292 ROBERTS,G:CONTROL S XX-6165 YATES:PROF MTGS IN XX-6165 YATES:PROF MTGS IN XX-6165 YATES:PROF MTGS [N XX-6165 YATES:PROF MTGS IN XX-0515 THORNHI LL:PUB/PRJT XX-0432 ELMO:I CBO/PROP MTGS XX-0432 ELMO:ICBO/PROP MTGS XX-1143 PARKER:MONTEREY CON XX-7824 COMERCHERO:MAYOR CF XX-7824 COMERCHERO:MAYOR CF AUG-OLD TWN COMMUNITY THE OLD TWN COMMUNITY THEATRE REFUND: TENNIS-INTER/ADVAN 001-100-999-5258 190-180-999-5212 001-110-999-5261 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5260 001-164-604-5260 001-161-999-5228 001-162-999-5228 001-162-999-5260 190-180-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5260 PAGE 7 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT t,aso.oD 1,aso.oo 167.91 760.00 75.00 150.00 1,152.91 17.95 17.95 55.16 55.16 12.92 12.92 1,589.42 49.98 193.14 77.42 s7.oo 83.32 84.65 219.64 54.93 548.63 1,031.84 22.10 210-190-167-5802 10,500.00 210-190-167-5802 6,000.00 190-183-4982 55.00 71409 09/13/01 004053 HABITAT WEST INC 71410 09/13/01 71410 09/13/01 71410 09/13/01 71410 09/13/01 71410 09/13/01 71410 09/13/01 71410 09/13/01 000186 000186 000186 000186 000186 000186 000186 HANKS HARDWARE IN[ HANKS HARDWARE INC HANKS HARDWARE INC HANKS HARDWARE INC HANKS HARDWARE INC HANKS HARDWARE INC HANKS HARDWARE INC R.C. DESILTATION PRJT 1ST HARDWARE SUPPL[ES:TCSD HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PW MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL HARDWARE SUPPLIES: CRC HARDWARE SUPPI[ES:TCSD HARDWARE SUPPLIES:RECREATION HARDWARE SUPPLIES:SR CENTER 210-190-171-5804 190-180-999-5212 001-164-607-5218 340-199-701-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-187-999-5301 190-181-999-5212 810.00 810.00 39.85 552.82 94.19 150.61 417.11 134.05 101.26 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR IT EM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCR IPTION 71410 09/13/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCC 71410 09/13/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:MNTC FAC 71410 09/13/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:PW MNTC C 71410 09/13/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:MUSEUM 71410 09/13/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:MUSEUM 71410 09/13/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:SMART PRG 71411 09/13/01 HICKEY, LAUREN RE FUND:CPR/FIRST AID TRAINI 71412 09/13/01 HICKMAN, DEBBIE RE FD:TINY TOT/YOUNG DISCOVE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL REVER 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK [NC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL L]FE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/73/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL REVER 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIfE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK [NC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL L[FE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK [NC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL ADVAN 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK [NC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71413 09/13/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 71414 09/13/01 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE RES IMPR PRGM:LaNATTE,ANTH01 71415 09/13/07 000193 1 C M A BOOK:UPGR ADING CI7Y HALL-C.1 71416 09/13/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 71416 09/13/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000794 DEF COMP 71416 09/13/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 77416 09/13/01 000194 I C N A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 71416 09/13/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 71416 09/13/01 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 71417 09/13/01 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 71418 09/13/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC CLEAN & SHIP ROD RUN BANNERS 71419 09/13/01 KEPPE L, ANGELA M. REFUND:SECURITY DEPT M501-2e 71420 09/13/01 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT AUG AFFIRMED HOUSING GROUP F -~ ..ten- . ~ - - __ ~. ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-184-999-5212 340-199-702-5212 001-164-601-5218 190-185-999-5212 190-185-999-5301 190-183-999-5372 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2510 340-2510 oo1-zslo 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2510 340-2510 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2570 340-2510 165-199-813-5804 001-110-999-5228 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 190-186-999-5250 280-199-999-5362 190-2900 165-199-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 152.78 16.11 20.74 444.93 25.28 128.97 43.00 62.00 243.15- 222.65 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 zzs.ls- 204.66 11.87 2.22 .74 .79 4.87 243.15 222.66 11.88 2.22 .74 .79 4.86 1,496.82 20.58 3,333.38 445.86 506.03 16.50 166.78 50.00 190.28 171.09 100.00 2,208.09 CHECK AMOUNT 2,278.70 43.00 62.00 486.30 1.496.82 20.58 4,518.55 190.28 171.09 100.00 2,208.09 VOUCHRE2 09/13/01 10:57 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 71421 09/13/07 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 77422 09/13/01 002519 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC WORK GLOVES:PW MNTC CREW 71422 09/13/01 002519 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC FREIGHT 71423 09/13/01 000869 LAWRENCE WE LK RESORT TH SR EXCURSION:9/19:"CAN CAN" 71424 09/13/01 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS 8 SERVI JUL SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGR 71424 09/13/01 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS 8 SERVI AUG SVGS-LIBRARY SYSTEM ACR 71425 09/13/01 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC LIFEGUARD UMBRELLA RING GU[ 71425 09/13/01 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC LIFEGUARD UMBRELLA RING HOL 71425 09/13/01 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC FREIGHT 71425 09/13/01 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC SALES TAX 71426 09/13/01 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS "SCHOOL CROSSING" SIGNS 71427 09/13/01 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 8/26 LARKI N-M 71428 09/13/01 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS JUL SPORTS PRGM UMPIRE SVLS 71428 09/13/01 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS AUG SPORTS PRGM UMPIRE SVGS 71429 09/13/01 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC INVITATIONS COMMISSION DINNI 71429 09/13/01 000220 MAURI CE PRINTERS INC SALES TAX 71430 09/13/01 MCLAUGHLIN, SEERI RE FUND:GYMNASTI CS-EARLY TUMI 71431 09/13/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 71431 09/13/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 71431 09/13/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 71431 09/13/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 71431 09/13/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 71431 09/13/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 71431 09/13/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 71431 09/13/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 71432 09/13/01 MIDDLE EAST WORLD SECTO RE FUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MSO1-2291 71433 09/13/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS "TEMECULA POLICE" ENVELOPES 71433 09/13/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS "TEMECULA POLICE" LETTERHEAC 71433 09/13/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 71434 09/13/01 MISSION POOLS, INC. RE FUND:BLDG PERMIT:601 -2378 71434 09/13/01 MISSION POOLS, [NC. RE FUND:BLDG PERMIT:B01-2378 71434 09/13/01 MISSION POOLS, INC. RE FUND:BLDG PERMIT:601-2378 71435 09/13/01 001214 MORN[NGSTAR MUSICAL PRO ENTERTAINMENT Q CRC ON 8/30/ 71436 09/13/01 003715 MORTON TRAffIC MARKINGS STENCIL PAINT FOR PUBLIC NOR 71437 09/13/01 001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL BASKETBALL OFFICIATING SERVI ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-186-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 190-183-999-5350 001-101-999-5285 001-101-999-5285 190-186-999-5242 190-186-999-5242 190-186-999-5242 190-186-999-5242 001-164-601-5244 001-161-999-5118 190-187-999-5250 190-187-999-5250 001-100-999-5265 001-100-999-5265 190-183-4982 001-2340 165-2340 190-2340 193-2340 194-2340 280-2340 330-2340 340-2340 190-2900 001-170-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-162-4285 001-162-4200 001-2290 190-183-999-5370 007-164-601-5218 190-187-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 55.60 529.20 9.37 660.00 1,185.94 1,315.80 103.50 22.50 6.29 9.45 172.00 516.00 1,400.00 3,850.00 99.00 7.43 44.00 4,179.21 200.93 687.56 61.12 5.44 100.45 18.15 130.60 100.00 68.53 58.74 9.55 237.50 74.25 .76 600.00 451.50 388.00 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 55.60 538.57 660.00 2,501.74 141.74 172.00 516.00 5,250.00 106.43 44.00 5,383.46 100.00 136.82 312.51 600.00 451.50 388.00 wC, - _ . __c-i ..~~s*5 _ _ VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 71438 09/13/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLIC 71439 09/13/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE 8 SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS 8 MAI 71439 09/13/01 002105 OLD TONN TIRE 8 SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS 8 MAI 71439 09/13/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE 8 SERVICE CI7Y VEHICLE REPAIRS 8 MAI 71439 09/13/01 002105 OLD TONN T[RE 8 SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS 8 MAI 71439 09/13/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE 8 SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS 8 MAI. 77439 09/13/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE 8 SERVILE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS 8 MAII 71440 09/13/01 004491 OLD TYME FOLK ENTERTAINMENT: SMR NI GHTS: B, 71441 09/13/01 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN HALLONEEN BAGS XE-25/2412 71441 09/13/01 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN TEENIE HALLOWEENIES XE-18/: 71441 09/13/01 001177 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN TEENIE LANDY BOXES XE-18/3i 71441 09/13/01 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN PENCILS XE-25/2416 71441 09/13/01 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN FREIGHT 71441 09/13/01 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN SALES TAX 71442 09/13/01 PAPAGOLOS, GUS REIMB:OFFICE EOUIP:f INANCE 71443 09/13/01 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 71444 09/13/01 002861 PETSMART SUPPLIES FOR POLICE K-9 UNI 71445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 71445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY LASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 77445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 71445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 71445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 71445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 71445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 71445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 71445 09/13/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 71446 09/13/01 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL 8 POSTAL SERVS 71447 09/13/01 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN AUG VAR.PUBLIC NTCS:PLANNIN 71447 09/13/01 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN AUG VAR-PUBLIC NTCS: PLANNIN 71447 09/13/01 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN AUG VAR. RECRUIT ADS FOR HR 71448 09/13/01 002483 PRO TECH SERVICES/PARTS AQUATICS-MISC POOL HEATER P 71449 09/13/07 004529 OUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON POLICE MOTORCYCLE:ID#620273 71449 09/13/01 004529 OUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON EXTENDED WARRANTY SERVICE 71449 09/13/01 004529 GUAID HARLEY-DAVIDSON TOUR PACK, INSTALLED 71449 09/13/01 004529 gUA[D HARLEY-DAV[DSON SALES TAX 71450 09/13/01 002012 R D O EOUI PMENT COMPANY REPAIR 8 MAINT OF PW EOUI PM 71451 09/13/01 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC APR DESIGN SVCS:NW SPRT COM ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-170-999-5220 001-165-999-5214 001-163-999-5214 001-165-999-5214 001-164-601-5214 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 280-199-999-5362 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 001-140-999-5242 001-2122 001-170-999-5327 001-761-999-5260 190-183-999-5340 190-183-999-5320 001-161-999-5262 001-110-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 001-720-999-5225 001-161-999-5220 001-770-999-5220 001-120-999-5230 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-150-999-5254 190-186-999-5212 001-170-502-5610 001-170-502-5610 001-170-502-5610 001-170-502-5610 001-164-601-5215 210-2030 ITEM AMOUNT 103.45 19.15 26.77 170.94 37.37 17-00 701.36 100.00 2.95 29.50 4.95 1.95 7.95 1.65 177.35 83.99 101.54 29.08 25.26 30.52 9.75 29.63 29.63 24.87 45.17 16.11 100.00 127.00 1-25 2,786.75 57.08 12,495.00 884.00 3,900.00 1,229-62 1,708-71 610.00 PAGE 10 CHECK AMOUNT 103.45 972.59 100.00 48.95 177.35 83.99 101-54 240.02 100-00 2,315.00 57.08 18,508.62 1,708.71 610.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER 01ST AUG 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL ST 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIWS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIWS WATER METERS 77452 09/73/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER D[ST VARIOUS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIWS WATER METERS 71452 09/13/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH C[TY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 8 Fl 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR HASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & Fl 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH C[TY VEHICLE DETAILING 8 Gi 71453 09/13/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 8 GF 71453 09/13/07 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & G1 71454 09/13/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS DUPL. BLUEPRINTS FOR B8S 71454 09/13/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS BLUEPRINT COPIES 71455 09/13/01 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE R-O-W WEED SPRAY/DEBRIS PGk 71456 09/13/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RENTAL EOUIP FOR PW MAINT 71457 09/13/01 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK 8 RE JUL RECORDINGS 8 COPIES 71457 09/13/01 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK 8 RE JUL RECORDINGS & COPIES 71458 09/13/01 ROBERT JOHN NAPIER SOCC RE FUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-181 71459 09/13/01 ROY, SEAN RE FUND:SEC.DEPOS[T:MS01-205 71460 09/13/01 003576 S Y S TECHNOLOGY INC PRINTER, HP DIGITAL SENDER 71460 09/13/01 003576 S Y S TECHNOLOGY INC SALES TAX 71461 09/13/01 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUIT AD: FINANCE ASST. DI 71462 09/13/01 SANDERS, JAMES LEE RE FUND :SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT 71463 09/13/01 SCHLUSSEL, BEN REFUND: CANCEL ROOM RENTAL 71463 09/13/01 SCHLUSSEL, BEN REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS00-341 71464 09/13/01 SERNA, MELINA RE FUND:LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS 71465 09/13/01 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL 8 SPA JUL TES POOL MAINT SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199-999-5250 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-184-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 190-188-999-5240 001-164-603-5240 001-165-999-5250 001-164-601-5214 001-162-999-5214 001-165-999-5214 001-165-999-5263 001-110-999-5214 001-110-999-5263 001-163-999-5214 001-161-999-5263 001-161-999-5214 001-164-601-5214 001-162-999-5222 001-161-999-5222 001-164-601-5402 001-164-601-5238 001-163-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-2900 190-2900 320-1970 320-1970 001-150-999-5254 001-163-4380 190-182-4990 790-2900 190-186-4970 190-186-999-5250 ITEM AMIXINT 53.30 15,198.61 176.17 252.57 429.30 240.90 8,131.26 620.70 67.95 101.78 677.98 1,011.69 7.00 49.00 7.00 23.12 28.00 93.39 138.00 50.23 28.00 24.00 86.00 49.34 4,227.00 210.71 10.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 2,810.00 210.75 493.17 100.00 15.00 100.00 25.00 716.00 PAGE 11 CHECK AMOUNT 26,962.21 447.74 135.34 4,227.00 210.71 60.00 100.00 100.00 3,020.75 493.17 100.00 115.00 25.00 =_ VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 734.00 1,450.00 399.00 399.00 71465 09/13/01 000403 SHANN SCOTT POOL & SPA AUG TES POOL MAINT SERVICES 71466 09/13/01 000751 SKI LLPATH INC 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 71467 09/13/01 000537 SO CALIF EDI SON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDI SON 000537 SO CALIF EDI SON 000537 SO CALIF ED[SON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDI SON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF ED]SON 000537 SO CALIF EDI SON BUS.WRITING AUG 2-17-274-0428 MEADOWS P AUG 2-06-105-0654 VARIOUS SEPT 2-18-363-1902 PAUBA RD SEPT 2-22-057-2226 VAR]OUS SEPT 2-22-057-2234 MARGARIT AUG 2-19-538-2262 VARIOUS M AUG 2-20-798-3248 VARIOUS M AUG 2-20-798-3248 VARIOUS M AUG 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VI AUG 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VI SEPT 2-Oi-202-7330 VARIOUS AUG 2-22-964-7466 VIA REINA SEPT 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS AUG 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS AUG 2-20-140-9299 VARIOUS 71468 09/13/01 SO.CAL.BASEBALL USSSA RE FUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:M501-7 71469 09/13/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SVCS-P.D. CA 190-186-999-5250 001-171-999-5261 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-188-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 192-180-999-5319 193-180-999-5240 190-780-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 790-2900 001-170-999-5250 71470 09/13/01 004374 SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS TRAF.000NT DATA:VAR. LOCATIONS 001-164-602-5250 71470 09/13/07 004374 SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS TRA F.000NT DATA:VALLEJO/LA PAZ 001-164-602-5250 71471 09/13/01 SWEENEY, TARA RE FUND: SEC.DEPOS[T:MS01-17971 190-2900 71472 09/13/01 003828 TANGRAM INTERIORS 2 DRAWER CABINET fOR PLANNIN G 001-161-999-5601 71473 09/13/01 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES-SMART PR IM 190-183-999-5372 71473 09/13/01 000305 TARGET STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT 001-163-999-5220 71473 09/13/01 000305 TARGET STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT 001-165-999-5220 71473 09/13/01 000305 TARGET STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT 001-164-604-5220 71473 09/13/01 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR MPSC 190-181-999-5301 71474 09/13/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 71474 09/13/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 71474 09/13/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 71474 09/13/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 71474 09/13/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 71474 09/13/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 71474 09/13/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLE X 001-1020 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLE X 165-1020 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 790-1020 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 38.16 2,334.27 26.71 91.71 47.18 98.81 163.22 15.74 6,406.85 1,896.02 33,673.14 12.89 13,648.15 2,798.30 263.96 100.00 29.00 250.00 78.00 100.00 1,049.63 27.45 83.40 83.40 83.41 61.20 641.24 119.26 6.75 2.25 67.50 33.76 57.74 4,060.76 225.00 934.00 9.75 1.25 3.75 61,515.11 100.00 29.00 328.00 100.00 1,049.63 332.86 922.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 13 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CNECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLE X 280-1020 75-00 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLE X 330-1020 466-66 71475 09/13/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLE % 340-1020 11.25 5,787.42 71476 09/13/01 000168 TEMECULA (LOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 102.02 102.02 71477 09/13/01 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PD 001-170-999-5214 473.20 71477 09/13/01 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PD 001-170-999-5214 755.48 71477 09/13/01 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MA INT:TEM PD 001-170-999-5214 9-72 71477 09/13/01 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM BPD 001-170-999-5214 574.37 71477 09/13/01 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL SALES TAX FOR INVH 283849 001-170-999-5214 34.19 71477 09/13/01 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM 'PD 001-2030 2,269.19 4,116.15 71478 09/13/01 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE 8 PARK PLUMBING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 581.49 71478 09/13/01 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE 8 AUG CRC PLUMBING SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 318.20 899-69 71479 09/13/01 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT TCC LOCKSMITH SERVICES 190-184-999-5212 887.63 887.63 71480 09/13/01 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 20.00 71480 09/13/01 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 60.00 71480 09/13/01 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 20.00 100.00 77481 09/13/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 313.60 71481 09/13/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 352-80 71481 09/13/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 235.20 71481 09/13/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 235-20 71481 09/13/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 352.80 1,489-60 71482 09/13/01 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL TRUSTEE ADMIN FEES - RDA BON DS 360-199-999-5227 4,553.50 4,553.50 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 9,493.12 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEf COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 126.16 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,979.13 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S L M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 192-2080 2.50 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S C M NEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 98.71 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 29.50 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S L M NEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 142.36 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 88.54 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 1,416.68 71483 09/13/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 169.44 13,546.14 71484 09/13/01 000389 U S C M WEST <OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 948-98 71484 09/13/01 000389 U S C M NEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 89-84 71484 09/13/01 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 1,410-22 71484 09/13/01 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 23.38 71464 09/13/01 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2760 27.96 71484 09/13/01 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 320-2160 70.08 71484 09/13/01 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 P7 RETIR 330-2160 58-78 71484 09/13/01 000389 U S C M NEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 340-2160 24.96 2,654.20 71485 09/13/01 UHDEN, COLLEEN RE FUND:EXERC[SE-PREGNANCY YOG A 190-183-4982 43.00 43.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 09/13/01 10:57 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ LHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 Uu 71486 09/13/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 71487 09/13/01 004504 VAIL RANCH SELF STORAGE AUDIO/VIDEO TAPE STORAGE 71488 09/13/01 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE JUL 68S PLAN CHECK SERVICES 71488 09/13/01 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE AUG B&S PLAN CHECK SERVICES 71489 09/13/01 004261 VER120N CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-1289 PRATT 71489 09/13/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-1408 PD SATELLITE 5 71489 09/13/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-2626 PD SATELLITE S 71489 09/13/01 004261 VER120N CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-2629 NAGGAR 71489 09/13/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-2670 911 AUTO DIALE 71489 09/13/01 004261 VERI ZON CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-3539 GENERAL USAGE 71489 09/13/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA AUG XXX-5509 GENERAL USAGE 71490 09/13/01 004279 VERI ZON CALIFORNIA INC. SEP ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE L 71490 09/13/01 004279 VER120N CALIFORNIA INL. SEP ACLESS-RVSD CO OPEN LIN 71497 09/13/01 VOGT, KAREN RE FUND:LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS 71492 09/13/01 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 71493 09/13/01 003730 WEST COAST ARBORI STS IN CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING MAIN 71493 09/13/01 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING MAIN 71494 09/13/01 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CITY NALL LEGAL PUBLICATION 71495 09/13/01 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN MISC. SUPPLIES - PW MAINT C 71496 09/13/01 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI JUL BASE CHARGE_DLCS 50 COP 71496 09/13/01 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI SALES TAX TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER oot-zlzo 165-2120 190-2120 192-2120 193-2120 194-2120 280-2120 320-2120 330-2120 340-2120 001-120-999-5277 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 320-199-999-5208 001-170-999-5229 001-170-999-5229 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 190-786-4970 190-182-999-5212 001-164-607-5402 001-164-601-5402 001-120-999-5228 001-164-601-5218 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5217 ITEM AMOUNT 127.05 8.75 22.60 .11 2.20 .49 2.50 5.00 5.00 .60 43.50 5,203.52 240.00 52.52 265.17 206.98 45.44 24.89 33.91 130.58 345.30 345.30 25.00 100.73 165.80 82.90 29.55 175.69 534.96 40.12 PAGE 14 CHECK AMOUNT 174.30 43.50 5,443.52 759.49 690.60 25.00 100.73 248.70 29.55 175.69 575.08 427,258.46 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMELULA PAGE 2 09/13/01 11:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MW SE7 ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND AMOUNT 183,658.45 531.00 3,408.00 150,094.86 399.45 1,139.70 5,965.50 TOTAL 345,196.96 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 09/13/01 11:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION 71499 09/25/01 003717 AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR AUG PRGSS:SLURRY SEAL PR JT 71499 09/25/01 003717 AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR AUG PRGSS:SLURRY SEAL PRGM 71500 09/25/01 002547 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV R8R RANCHO VISTA DITCH 8 INI 71501 09/25/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/24 VOSHALL 71501 09/25/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/24 NAASEH 71502 09/25/01 004239 FISHER MERRIMAN SEHGAL DESIGN SVCS:OLD TWN THEATER ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER AMOUNT 001-164-601-5402 22,431.55 001-164-601-5402 35,505.95 001-164-601-5401 5,460.00 001-161-999-5118 1,783.38 001-161-999-5118 5,027.78 210-190-167-5802 26,250.00 71503 09/25/01 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH 8 ASSOCIA JUL SVC:MARGARITA IMPR PW99 i01 210-165-706-5802 278.52 71503 09/25/01 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH 8 ASSOCIA JUL SVC:MARGARITA IMPR PW99-01 210-765-713-5802 26.42 71503 09/25/01 003815 GFB FR[EDRI CH 8 ASSOCIA JUL SVC:MARGARITR IMPR PW99 X01 210-165-706-5802 2,881.68 71503 09/25/01 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH 8 ASSOCIA JUL SVC:MARGARITA IMPR PW99 i01 210-165-713-5802 273.32 71503 09/25/01 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH 8 ASSOCIA JUL SVC:MARGARITA IMPR PW99- 1 210-165-706-5802 2,778.00 71504 09/25/01 003266 LIBRARY SYSTEMS 8 SERVI JUL SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMNT 001-101-999-5285 11,203.20 71504 09/25/01 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS 8 SERVI AUG SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 8,760.49 71505 09/25/01 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC MAR DESIGN SVCS:NW SPRT 71505 09/25/01 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC APR DESIGN SVCS:NW SPRT 71505 09/25/07 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC MAY DESIGN SVCS:NW SPRT 71505 09/25/01 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP [NC JUN DESIGN SVC:NW SPRTS 71505 09/25/01 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC APR CONSULT SVCS:SPORTS 71506 09/25/01 004572 R MOODY CONSTRUCTION IN PRGS PMT#1:MPSC EXPAN:PW 71506 09/25/01 004572 R MOODY CONSTRUCTION IN RET.W/H PMT#i:MPSC EXPAN 71507 09/25/01 002412 71507 09/25/01 002412 71507 09/25/01 002412 71507 09/25/07 002412 71507 09/25/01 002412 71507 09/25/01 002412 71507 09/25/01 002412 71507 09/25/01 002412 71507 09/25/01 002412 71507 09/25/01 002412 RICHARDS NATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH RICHARDS WATSON 8 GERSH JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JUL 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 71508 09/25/01 004496 SPARKS EXHIBITS 8 ENVIR CHILDRENS MUSEUM CONSULT TOTAL CHECKS 210-2030 210-2030 210-2030 210-2030 210-2030 210-190-163-5804 210-2035 001-130-999-5246 165-199-999-5246 190-180-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 280-799-999-5246 261-199-999-5246 001-2643 001-2642 001-2600 210-165-631-5801 210-190-165-5802 5,294.36 15,266.53 10,730.20 8,497.57 5,750.00 56,000.00 5,600.00- 50,043.13 531.00 3,408.00 5,965.50 1,139.70 399.45 9,190.00 34,131.47 121.50 1,668.26 zo, ooo. 00 CHECK AMOUNT 57,937.50 5,460.00 6,811.16 26,250.00 6,237.94 19,963.69 45,538.66 50,400.00 106,598.07 zo,ooo.oo 345.196.96 :.5. :.~ .~ .= ..-~. ems...-. ' . _ _ _. ITEM 3 __ MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP JULY 17, 2001 CALL TO ORDER The City Council and Planning Commission convened in and adjourned regular joint workshop at 7:00 P.M., on Tuesday, January 16, 2001, in the City Couniil Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers: Naggar~ Pratt, Stone, Roberts, Comerchero Planning Commissioners: Chiniaeff, Mathewson, Telesio, Guerriero. Absent: Planning Commissioner: ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Mayor Comerch'ero. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Councilman Naggar. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS No comments. CITY COUNCIL/COMMISSION BUSINESS 1 The Roripauph Ranch Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Consider the information provided by staff and provide direction to staff on the proposed project. Project Planner V Naaseh-Shahry presented the staff report and noted that the purpose of this workshop would be to provide a project status update and to obtain direction from the City Council and the Planning Commission with regard to identified issues noted in the staff report and, as well, to obtain input from the community. Referencing the Land Use Plan, Mr. Naaseh- Shahry described the various elements of the proposed project including the pan handle, annexed area, loop road, park site, Long Valley Chanriel, Fire Station site, density, and buffering. With regard to buffering, it was noted that the property to the east will be buffered by 2.5-acre lots with the transitioning to smaller lots and buffering to the south will be a minimum of 20,000 square foot lot. R:1Minutes\071901 1 Environmental Imaact Reoort (EIR) That the EIR was sent out fora 45-day review That the finalization of the EIR was late by ap encountered with the traffic study Specific Plan (SP) that the SP was delayed because of delays as was insufficient time to review the Specific I received by the applicant on June 26, 2001 schedule that a redline copy of the SP has been re therefore, staff must review the SP page by pay, that the design guidelines have been labeled w Develooment Agreement that several meetings have occurred with the been made with regard to the deal points Deadlines that as a result of delays, it has been difficult to project would be discussed at the August 1, 2 and then at the August 14, 2001, City Council mi t which will end July 26, 2001 lately 22 days because of issues ted with the EIR; therefore, there that the last screen check was ch was 18 days after the time but has not been received; in progress but that no progress has the set deadlines to ensure the Planning Commission meeting that a Community meeting in conjunction with the City Council subcommittee was held on July 9, 2001; concerns expressed by the community with regard to this project related to drainage, traffic, development in Nicolas Valley, and buffering on the south and east sides of the project, advising that the City Council subcommittee recommended that a minimum of 2.5 acre lot sizes buffer the orooertv to the south and east. City Council/Commission questions In response to Chairman Guerriero, the following • that a Community Facilities District (a tax proposed project not an Assessment District; • that the City has received the formation dep~ are funding the financing team and initial forn • that it has been difficult to obtain consensus s • that a feasibility study was completed a indicated that the Community Facilities Disti $24 million for public infrastructure; that v improvements have been submitted for inclu: amount of $44 million; that $44 million woi funded; that staff has refined the list of imp infrastructure for Butterfield Stage Road an total cost of $24 million; R:\Minutes\071901 was provided by staff: district) will be formed for the it amount from the applicants who lion activities; the scope of work; proximately one-year ago which I (CFD) could fund approximately iin the last six months, various n to the CFD for a total requested I be an unfeasible amount to be cements to include the backbone Murrieta Hot Springs Road for a _ . that there are three property owners inc Lennar, Callaway 220 that the funding gap for the lower portion at $2.5 to $3.5 million. in the CFD - Roripaugh Ranch, Butterfield Stage Road is estimated Wishing that the project would have progressed further than what it has, Commissioner Telesio expressed concerns with regard to sidewalk pavement and parkways. In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff, the following was that staff has diligently worked on this proje applicant has not adhered to the set deadlin that the General Plan permits 3 dwelling ur units for this particular project; that the proje that the reduction on the southerly edge t would reduce the overall density by 80 units by staff: in order to fast track it but that the > per acre, allowing 2,400 to 2,500 has been decreased to 1,700 units 2.5 acres (for buffering purposes) Questioning whether staff should continue to proceed to fast track this project, Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that the financing process for the CFD debends on the yield on the property, noting that if the yield were not available, the financing for Butterfield Stage Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road would not, as well, be available. In response to Commissioner Mathewson, the following • that the southerly edge of the property will square foot lots with a maximum of 2.5 acre In light of the unresolved issues, Commissioner to fast track a project of this magnitude. Councilman Pratt noted that, in his opinion, the implemer potentially mitigate major issues of concern with regard to In response to Councilman Naggar, the following was • that the neighboring properties to the comparison to the project site • that the incorporation of the Trails Master PI. being explored • that land uses included in the EIR and Harveston Specific Plan; that the guidelines analyze any approved projects or projects in • that with regard to the CFD, the applicant ~ fund improvements in excess of $24 million Supporting the accelerated time schedule for the commented on the developer's real estate option construction of Butterfield Stage Road, viewing it as a t System. If this project were not reviewed and app timeframe, Councilman Naggar commented on the po the County. noted by staff: buffered by a minimum of 20,000 expressed concern with continuing ~n of a public transit system could project. by staff: have a higher elevation in is being discussed and issues are the traffic analysis included the r analysis require the applicant to process of being reviewed ~Id have to find prior financing to rsed project, Councilman Naggar Ilines as well as addressed the component of the City's Circulation by the City within the scheduled y of this project being reviewed by R:\Minutes\071901 Noting that the CFD currently involves three property owi that, in his opinion, other property owners should be payin response to Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, Project Planner V N dependent on the quality of the proposed project as to wl could be met, noting that the deadlines for a high quality Tem Roberts noted that the neighboring properties on th properties on the east side. Supporting the continuation of fast tracking this project, ~ City's need of an Eastern Bypass. Mr. Stone as improvements as a result of this project -ones whi development (8 traffic signals and landscaped areas aloe well referenced conditions imposed upon the developer s the issuance of the first building permit to ensure financ Stage Road and the Fire Station improvements. ors, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated their fair share toward the CFD. In aseh-Shahry stated that it would be ;ther or not the proposed deadlines roject could not be met. Mayor Pro south side are more rural than the uncilman Stone commented on the cell referenced numerous off-site don't have a true nexus to the Murrieta Hot Springs Road) and as 1 as the funding of the CFD prior to is in place to construct Butterfield In an effort to increase the buffering on the southern boundary, Mayor Comerchero recommended that the lot sizes in Planning Area Nos. 2~ and 22 be decreased in order to compensate for the lost units along the southern boundary. Although the applicant was not of the opinion that the number of lost lots (80) could be recovered by the reduction of units in Planning Area Nos. 21 and 22. Applicant's presentation Mr. Kevin Everett, representing the developer Ashby following with regard to the proposed project: • that documents have been supplied to the City, in improvements (including the Eastern Bypass • drainage improvements -need for a culvert syst • Assessment District No. 161 debt of $835,0( Facilities District • Improvements-funded/unfunded For the benefit of the Council/Commission/and public, elements of the proposed project, commenting on the folk noted and commented on the ecting the need for $44.7 million all regional connectors) prior to forming the Community r. Everett highlighted the various • Neighborhood park • Fire Station site/site cost • Drainage • Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road -developer would prefer that the Development Fee per unit be allocated for the construction of these roads but advised that staff has recommended that those funds be allocated toward the Fire Station • Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) should be waived • Habitat Fee -donating 201 acres of habitat into the system • Library fees • Corporate fees • Off-site traffic mitigation • Community Facilities District (on-site $20 million and off-site $11 million) R:\Minutes\071901 4 • Full mitigation of school impacts • Average lot size is 6,300 square feet -lot sizes feet) The following individuals addressed the C concerns with regard to the proposed project: • Mr. Ladd Stokies • Mr. Hans Kernkamp • Ms. Sue Gaiser • Ms. Anne Kernkamp • Ms. Sue Knowlton • Mr. Mike Knowlton • Ms. Terri Harrison • Mr. Andrew Gallo • Ms. Karen Bales • Mr. Tim Messer • Mr. C.E. Edwards • Mr. Ed Picozzi • Mr. Richard Harrison • Ms. Helen Lasagna • Mr. Ronald Knowles • Mr. Bill Vazzana 39426 Jessie Circle 39055 Liefer Road 31300 Nicolas Road 39055 Liefer Road 39130 Pala Vista Drive 39130 Pala Vista Drive 40025 Walcott Lane 39445 Pala Vista Drive 39340 Jessie Circle 39120 Liefer Road 31250 Nicolas Road 31480 Nicolas Road 40025 Walcott Lane P.O. Box 1136 39675 Cantrell Road 39605 Avenida Lynell Concerns/comments/suggestions with regard to the mentioned individuals were as follows: • Lack of buffering • Lack of improvements on Nicolas Road • Land use incompatibility • 78' two-lane road proposed on west side - traffic • Reduction of density -relocate higher density u • Support of the annexation • Density on Nicolas Road -should be a four-lanE • Need for aTrail/equestrian system including side • Children's travel route to Chaparral High School • Quality of life • Constant and numerous changes to the propose • Use of Nicolas Road for construction traffic • Elevation • Retention of the rural atmosphere - CEQA requ • Generation of traffic onto Nicolas Road • View impact • Not favoring a future Assessment District to add • Request a balance • Water distribution and erosion • Habitat conservation At this time, City Clerk Jones apprised the City Council of with regard to the Roripaugh Ranch Draft EIR. R:\Minutes\071901 5 from 3.7 acres to 5,000 square and expressed the following project were raised by the above- concerns ~s to the Village Core area road to ensure traffic flow nralks, bike paths, etc. project project concerns letter with 20 signatures (of record) At 8:49 P.M., a recess was called. Mayor Comerchero In response to Councilman Stone, Mr. Everett noted the • Developer has agreed to a work schedule; expr~ red lining the working document which, in turn, h • Issues with regard to the Development Agreerr Valley residents can be resolved • Encouraged, for future use, the creation of an is: • 78' road had been increased to 88'; that this ro road sections were redesigned on a cooperative Although not wanting to debate the time schedule issue, that the Planning Department has designated all departn project. Understanding staff's frustration with regard to deadlines, developer's willingness to pay for any contractual assist process this application and suggested that this option be the meeting at 9:03 P.M. ed concern with each department created a lot of changes and those raised by the Nicolas s list could have been 110' but that all sis with Public Works ;y City Manager Thornhill noted resources toward this particular ncilman Stone commented on the necessary in order for the City to City Manager Nelson reiterated that this project was to be reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 1, 2001, and that the Specific Plan was received 18 days late and that the Specific Plan does not have the red lines. In light of the residents' concerns, Mayor Pro Tem regard to providing equestrian accessibility on Nicolas In response to Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Man: Hughes, and Project Planner V Naaseh-Shahry noted the • that the City's current Circulation Element indict lane roadway (110' right-of-way) • that in light of recent downzoning, recent traf volumes would not justify a four-lane roar contemplated to downgrade that roadway • that the project has been conditioned to build a and a center turn lane • that at build out, it is estimated that the average 12,000 to 14,000 • that the buffering to the west (apartments/town to commercial zoning; existing MWD and EMW[ addition to a 20' landscaped buffer and wall • that drainage for Nicolas Road is being processi District and the City will be acting as a co processes and reviewing what the County is dicta • that flood levels higher than what would have approved as well relayed his concern with Thornhill, Public Works Director Nicolas Road as an arterial four- studies indicated that the traffic iy and, therefore, it is being width section and two 14' lanes daily trips on Nicolas Road will be comes) will range from 2.5 acre lots easements provide a 160' buffer in d through the County Flood Control nmenting agency to the approval ting previously been there can not be R:1Minutes\071901 6 that no State law provisions require the ado guidelines but that the City has traditionally rt every Specific Plan that it would not be recommended to adopt a the Development Agreement that the two larger parcels along Butterfield S Although it may be feasible to adopt a Specific Plan st Agreement, City Attorney Thorson advised that he w developer would have the necessary approvals to close Concurring with Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, Councilman all associated property owners in the CFD. of a Specific Plan to have design d design guidelines to be a part of Plan subject to the adoption of Road are included in the CFD. t to the adoption of a Development question whether by doing so the ow on his property. encouraged the participation of Providing clarification with regard to a Community Facilities) District and an Assessment District, Public Works Director Hughes commented on the impacts of increasing the size of the CFD. Councilman Pratt recommended that the subcommittee be expanded to include Planning Commission representation. In response to Mayor Comerchero's suggestion, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that because the developer has already obtained the necessary permits from Fish and Game/Fish and Wildlife, it would be difficult to redefine borders. Mrl Comerchero suggested that if the opportunity were available, that staff explore expanding Planning Area Nos. 13 and 14 and, thereby, decreasing the open space in Planning Area No. 10. Planning Commissioners' input In response to Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Everett that the deadline for receiving approval for this p that documents have been forwarded to Loy (LAFCO) that full build out would be expected in approxim Public Works Director Hughes provided additional capabilities, noting that bonds can not be sold unless forward and that incorporating Level of Service caps (information which would have to be disclosed) could h the following: ct would be August Agency Formation Commission five years ication as it relates to bonding is a certainty the project will move prevent pulling of building permits the ability to sell bonds. In response to Public Works Director Hughes, Councilman Naggar advised that the bonding company would be satisfied with selling bonds if it would have assurances in place that the project will proceed. In light of the open-ended issues, Commissioner Chiniaeff matter being addressed at the August 1, 2001, Planning Mr. Chiniaeff's concern with regard to equestrian a~ Administrator McCarthy advised that various locations foi constraints are being identified in the Master Plan. Mr. regard to the following: • land use location/land use conflicts toted that he would not foresee this ~mmission meeting. In response to ~essibility, Development Services trails are being explored and that ~hiniaeff expressed concerns with R:\Minutes\071901 • developer's escrow problem should not be the driving force of this project especially considering its magnitude • would not favor approving a project without a Development Agreement/design guidelines • Nicolas Road is a major road determined v~hen the County approved all the residences along the road prior to City incorporation; that the 110' road at Winchester Road will have to tie to the next major arterial which is Butterfield Stage Road I • That provisions have to be made for equestrian • That the proposed project is not ready for PI. August 1, 2001 In closing, Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed his desire Commission be a part of the City Council subcommittee n Commission consideration on have a member of the Planning Ning this project. Concurring with Commissioner Chiniaeff, Commissioner) Telesio noted that he would not envision this matter being ready to discuss at the August 1, 2001, Planning Commission meeting. Issues of concern and suggestions were as follows: lot sizing/buffering -west side reduction of density on east and south sides if deadlines are not met, what happens Expressing his objection to continuing to fast track Guerriero voiced concern with the following issues: • Nicolas Road • Buffering • Traffic mitigation fees for Winchester Road • CFD for Butterfield Stage Road Commenting on the time and pride the Planning Commis Chairman Guerriero noted that he could not foresee this 1, 2001, Planning Commission meeting. In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's comment, Counc of the Planning Commission should have been a part Although the project may not be ready for Commission coi Stone commented on the importance of this project be benefits of the Eastern Bypass and recommended to expa two members of the Planning Commission as well as two the citizens be invited for input. Councilman Naggar clarified that he had not intended Development Agreement or design guidelines but that he w the approval of those items. Noting that the impacts of this years to come, Mr. Naggar reiterated his desire to have th City versus the County and readdressed his concerns with sizes. R:\Minutes\071901 of this magnitude, Chairman takes in reviewing Specific Plans, ter being discussed at the August n Stone concurred that a member the City Council subcommittee. eration in two weeks, Councilman constructed in the City and the the City Council subcommittee to nbers of the City Council and that to approve a project without a ould support an approval subject to project will affect this City for many is project under the purview of the regard to buffering, safety, and lot Commissioner Chiniaeff reiterated that he would not envision this project being ready in two weeks for Planning Commission review and as well advised that he would be interested to serve on the City Council subcommittee for this project. Clarifying staff's recommendation to no longer fast track) this project, City Manager Nelson commented on staff's willingness to continue its efforts with regard to this project but noted that it would be staff's opinion that to accomplish this task in two weeks for the Planning Commission meeting would be an impossible task. In light of the issues that are still unresolved and issues that were addressed this evening by the residents, Deputy City Manager Thornhill confirmed that these issues can not be resolved in time for the August 1, 2001, Planning Commission meeting. In light of the Council/Commission comments, Mayor Comerchero suggested that staff continue to proceed with the project - a project that must as well meet the standards set for any other previously considered project. Commending the City Manager Nelson on his stance of assuring the proposed project will be a quality project within the City, Commissioner Telesio encouraged the Council, Commission, staff, and the applicant to continue to try to complete the project but assured that he would not be willing to accept a lesser project in exchange for better road circulation. Praising staff for their efforts associated with this project, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts noted that this project has been a straining task on staff. Commenting on the $40 million in improvements that the Cify stands to loose if this project were not considered, Councilman Stone requested that staff continue to extend its efforts until the deadline of September 30, 2001. In closing, Councilman Stone applauded the efforts of staff and noted that the Planning Commission must be an integral part of this process and offered the following motion: MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to direct that two m members of the Planning Commission (Subcommittee) me the subcommittee and staff work as diligently as possible that when staff determines that the project is ready foi publication process should be followed; and that the recommendations to the City Council for August 28, 2001, by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous In response to City Manager Nelson, Mr. Richard Ashby City Council approval by August 28, 2001, for the pr< Specific Plan, the Tentative Tract Maps, and the grading tubers of the City Council and two ~t with staff and the developer; that n order for this project to proceed; Planning Commission review, the Planning Commission make its ieeting. The motion was seconded :toper, advised that he must obtain the Development Agreement, the Mayor Comerchero suggested that a subcommittee meeting be scheduled for tomorrow in order to clarify the developer's requirements to assure the August 28, 2001, deadline. City Attorney Thorson clarified that there is no appeal pe decision; that there will be a first reading for ordinances ap Amendments, and Tentative Tract Maps; that there would I later; and that there would be a 30-day period before th there would as well be a 30-day statute of limitations for ~d once the City Council makes its oving a Specific Plan, General Plan a second reading at least five days ordinance becomes effective; that iallenging a legal challenge to the R:\Minutes\071901 statute of limitations; that most lenders would want to wait is a 90-day statute of limitations for approval of the zoning Councilman Naggar encouraged Mr. Ashby to start his loaf on the subcommittee if needed. Commissioners Chiniaeff and Commissioner Telesio offers ADJOURNMENT At 10:55 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adji 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business I that period of time; and that there process and as well offered to serve to serve on the subcommittee. ~d to Tuesday, July 24, 2001, at Drive, Temecula, California. Jett C:Omercher0, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\071901 10 ITEM 4 ATTORNEY. TOR OF FI MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manage+z'y DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Comment Letter on the Riverside County Circulation Element PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Management RECOMMENDATION: Approve the comment letter for Transportation Commission. BACKGROUND: This item was continued at the September 11, 2001 meeting. It was continued to the S action. to the Riverside County of the City Council at their 25, 2001 meeting for Council Various elements of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) are now available for review. One of the elements that has generated much interest is the Draft Circulation Element. City staff has reviewed the draft policies of the Circulation Element and prepared the attached letter for your review and approval. The Draft Circulation Element will be recirculated for the City's further review with the entire General Plan document sometime in 2002. We would like to caution you that the Draft Circulation Element will be part of the County's General Plan and should not be confused with the CETAP Temecula Corridor EIR/EIS. Although the two documents deal with some of the same subjects, they are different entities. We will bring a comment letter on the CETAP EIR/EIS for your approval in the near future. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct impacts, but if the proposed circulation policies are adopted by the County, the City will face undetermined costs to rectify traffic congestion within the City boundaries. ATTACHMENTS: City of Temecula Comment Letter Draft Circulation Element Comment letters from other review R:\BROWNS\RCIP\Circulation Element CC Stafrpt-9-25-01.doc 1 City of Temecula Letter ~_ City of Tem 43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 (909) 694-6400 -FAX (909) 694-6477 September 25, 2001 Cathy Bechtel Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Comments on Draft Circulation Element Dear Ms. Bechtel: The City of Temecula appreciates the opportunity to commen the General Plan. The City has been closely monitoring de within the southwest County for the past several years and it is will address many of the concerns we have raised with the following comments for your consideration: Policy C 1.1 The statement should include: "make a coordinated transit systems to broaden availability. C 1.2 The statement should include: "coordinate with to assure connectivity". -California - 92589-9033 on the Draft Circulation Element of ~elopment and transportation issues our hope that the new Integrated Plan ounty of Riverside. We present the with adjacent cities in the use of cities existing transportation options C 1.7 The first sentence in this policy may not have been edited and may need some clarification. We would like to offer the following as a possible replacement. "An additional easement of up to 2S shall be dedicated along both sides of roadways designated as ~'ransportation Corridors." This was recommended by the CETAP at their meeting of September 4, 2001. C 1.8 We appreciate that the County is concerned about the impact of the cities on the circulation system in the unincorporated territory. Temecula has been vigilant on our impacts to surrounding jurisdictions and feel this policy should be modified to include the County's impacts on cities too. C 1.11 We are concerned with the statement within this policy that implementation of the circulation system needs to be "...consistent with financing capabilities." We are concerned that financing limits may somehow hinder the completion of the necessary traffic improvements as expressed by this policy. This section needs to be rewritten to insure that the Land Use Element will not lead to excessive traffic while the circulation system languishes because of funding constraints. R:\BROWNS\R C 1 P\CETAP Draft response 9-25-Ol.dac C 2.1 The City feels this is a bad policy and the current SWAP standards need to be kept in place or strengthened. The City of Temecula supports the CETAP recommendation to maintain the current Levels of Service contained in the 1984 General Plan. The City of Temecula cannot agree with an increase of service levels that would allow for development toy continue in it current pattern without appropriate improvements at LOS C/D. C 2.5 We feel that the Circulation Element should also anticipate working with the High Speed Rail Authority. C 2.6 Relative to annexations, what would be considered short or intermediate time frames? C 2.7 Add "as amended to comply with the County's Implementation Plan". C 2.8 We have several thoughts on this section: • The first paragraph states that a traffic analysis must be prepared for the project plus those projects "already allowed in the area." We feel that a competent analysis should also include other projects that are concurrent in the planning process too. In addition, does this mean that those who add to the deficiency would not be responsible for incremental improvement? • To limit the study for the "build out" scenario may not be in the best interest of the County and cities. There may be instances where large projects might need certain key infrastructure improvements prior to build out. Large projects should have short and intermediate impacts studied as well as the build out stage. • The concept purported in the second paragraph is dangerous and is possibly a violation of CEQA. This paragraph should be completely eliminated. • The third paragraph is also dangerous. Approving projects with "overriding benefits" may have serious negative consequences for local (cities. Such a policy should require approval by all adjacent cities so they can concur In the perceived "benefit". C 2.36 This policy must set a realistic time to complete the process. We note it took many years for the County to complete the regional traffic study that was required as a matter of policy by the SWAP. C 5.1 This policy needs to be strengthened as illustrated by the Supervisor's actions on land uses surrounding the French Valley Airport. C 6.1 Add in addition to railroad right-of-way "or other utilities". R:\BROWNS\R C I P\CETAP Draft response 9-25-Ol.doc 2 If you have any questions regarding our comment please you to the appropriate department head to answer your q Sincerely, Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Cc: Shawn Nelson, City Manager Temecula City Council Temecula Planning Commission Riverside County Board of Supervisors Riverside County Planning Commission Richard Lashbrook, Director, TLMA Rick Bishop, WRCOG Executive Director Steve Smith, Trancor Juan Perez, Riverside County me at City Hall so I may direct R:\BROWNS\R C 1 %CETAP Draft response 9-25-Ol.doc 3 Draft Circulation County of Riverside General Plan - Circulation Element Introduction BACKGROUND The Circularton Element outlines th components and provides tools, such with development and implementati~ future. The Circu]ation Element is stn the~olicies and represents both the citizens and decision makers to provi existing and future residential, recrea Use Element. Issues and The policies listed below have been which describe how residents foresee the year 2020. The vision statements: are foreseen, but also how the plane system, addresses future mobility n development. The Vision Statement from the year 2020. The VLsion Statement says: "The Van: than kept pace with the growth in p demands for mobility. New and expa connect growth centers at key locati corridors will have built-in transit see various forms of transit. Some of the service to MetroLink stations. It will regard for the environment, including 1 s t}tat Aur open spaces can sustain hal Po~rctes L4, LUUI Dra f t .: necessary mulu-modal transportation system s the policies and the Circulation Plan to assist of the transportation system needed for the :cured to enable the effective implementation of functional and loca[ional criteria desired by e transportation mobility and quality access to on, and economic uses as defined in the Lend veloped considering the Vision Statement, transportation system in Riverside County by only addresses the types of development that infrastructtue, including the transportation s resulting from the planned growth and in a tvay that looks backjrom thefuture or nation system in Riverside County hasmore tlation, employment and tourism and the d vansportation corridors are planned that throughout the County, in fact, several and expansion capability to accommodate corridors are now providing express bus ctitical to design the cotridors with a high vision of critical wildlife corridor crossings t value". Page C-1 ~iverside General Plan - Draft The policies contained in this Chapter re desires of the Riverside County Board of SuI regarding the planned circulation system. D' ouveach meetings, preparation of the Conditions section of the Circulation Elen considering the vansportation objectivesrefe the Vision Statement for the Riverside Integrated Plan (RCIP), several key policyis identified including: Sveet and highway T Lave] of Service (LOS) Standazds, a vi effective public vansportation syste implementation and maintenance of recreati the need for consistent County/City St Highway Design Standards, and land usepla vansportation system integration. These k have been frilly considered and hay incorporated into the Policies included in thi System-Level Directives The overlying intent of the Gent ~~RCIP Vision Circulation Element is to est. comprehensive multi-modal vansportat New growth pettems no longer reflect a pattern oltltat is safe, achievable, efficient, envirc and financially sound, accessible, and cc random sprawl. Rather, they follow a framework of~~ the Land Use Element. II is im transportation and open space corridors, withdesign and implement amulti-modal vat concentretionsofdevelopmentthalfitintothatsystam that will serve projected fiat framework In other words, impoftant open specedemand, minimize congestion, achieve t and trenspodation condors define growth arees.feasible travel times and distances, az Growth Locus in this County is on quality, not on~ture growth and development in the C frustrating efforts to heft growth. In addition to planning for specific Population growth continues end is focused wheretransporiation that will serve the needs it can best be eccommodated.and future residents, integration of vansportation technologies is also imps Growth is well coordinated between cities and theme of new technologies [Intelligent Tra County end theyjointtyinfluencepedodicstaleendS stems (ITS will allow maximum regional growth forecestsv oriation)]nfrasvucture including effecting Riverside County and its cities. ~P ~ highways and vansit. Further, the need tnformation is critical in order to lessen -RCIP Vision f accidents and other special events in Real-time vaveler information can ma Riverside County more enjoyable and r and congestion. One of the most important considerations to achieve a viable vansportation system is financing. Funding priorities must be d innovative financing must be designed [o ensure that the vansporta implemented over the next 20 years. Policies: C:~ wORKWROJECTSIRCfPICIRCFtFMEMVOGICIES~CEPOiJCIESt ]6MORDD[C act the avisors ing the ;xisting nt, and raced in county Les were inimum rte and t, the n nails, :et and wing and y issues been Section. tl Plan lish a a system nentally rdinated triant to ~ortation e navel ;shortest address ann~ toles of 'existing dvanced ant. The poriation to of the Beets and a traveler eimpacts e region. traveling lace delay lti•modal fped and svstem is l'-2 County of Riverside General Plan -~ D~aft Circulation Element ~x,a'f~~~ ``. C 1. I Design the vansportation svs tem in a manner that responds [o concentrations of population and emplo}mte nt activities in nodal azeas designated by the Land Use Element. ~~ C 1.2 Supportdevelopmrnlofava rietyofvansporiationoptionsavai]abletomajor employment and activity cen ters including direct access to express transit routes, primary arterial hig hways, bikeways, park-n-ride facilities, and Despite differences in priorities end pedestrian facilities. approaches, we ere engaged in community buildinghrourselvesandourheirsbesed C 1.3 Consider the integration o f Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) on the common ground we have forged consistent with principles an d recommendations referenced in the Inland ~~ Empire ITS Strategic Plan during implementation of the transportation system. C 1.4 Equitably distribute [he costs of transportation system improvements. C 1.5 New development shall pay a fair share of the costs for providing local and regional transportation system improvements necessary to serve current and new development C ].6 Utilize existing infrastructure and public services to the maximum extent and provide for the logical, timely and economically efficient extension of infraswcture and services. C 1.7 Dedicate an additional easement of up to 25' shall be dedicated along both sides of roadways designated) as Transportation Corridors. Such easements shall be reserved for future transportation system improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: provisions for express transit services, fixed guideway systems, and/or auxiliary lanes. Until needed for such improvements, such easements may be utilized, under permit, for additional parking and/or landscaping. C ].8 Work with the incorporated cities to mitigate the cumulative impacts of incorporated and unincorporated development on [he Countywide transportation system. Use annexations, redevelopment agreements, revenue sharing agreements, tax allocation agreements and the CEQA process as tools to rnsure that development within the cities pays its fair share toward mitigating traffic impacts in the unincorporated portions of the County. C 1.9 Use the County's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to establish improvement priorities acid scheduling for transportation project conswction. C I.10 Implement the General Plan circulation system as shown in the Circulation Plan Map, Figure XX. Provision of a street and highway network that supports and is consistent with Land Use Element policies of the County is ~an overlying desire of Riverside County. The CounTy must establish a network that sirpporis the navel needs of existing and future development designated in the Land Use Element. Policies: sprit za, zom pae<ca -iverside General Plan - Draft C 1.11 Implement the circulation plan in a manner that supports the implementation of adopted General Plan Land Use map and land use policies ani that are consistent with fmancing capabilities. Streets and Highways A well-planned and designed street and highway system facilitates the movement of vehicles and provides safe and convenient access to surrounding development. Riverside County's past efforts to develop a system of local, collector an~ arterial highways and roads has provided the basis for a safe, efficient roadway system. Arterial roads have been built with sufficient capacity to accommodate long-tens traffic growth. In addition, driveway access has been limited to promote safe and efficient operations. Through this Element, the County will continue to provide a system of highways and roads that meets the needs of current and future residents. This can be accomplished through development of a functional classificazion system for major highways, set rnirtirntun tighisof--way and design standards, and the identification of needed roadway improvements. In addition, the road system must be based upon and consistent with the Land Use Element resulting in a highway and road system that has adequate capacity and acceptable levels of service to accommodate projected [ravel demand. Finally, roadway improvement funds should be allocated to enhance moliility and promote convenient, safe and efficient transport of people, goods and materials. Level of Service Riverside County must provide and maintain a highway system with adequate capacity and acceptable levels of service to accommodate projected travel demands for the 20-year planning period. This can be accomplished by maintaining a "D" Level of Service (LOS) or better along the designated street and highway system. Strategies that result in improvements to the transportation system, coupled with local job creation; will allow County residents to have access to a wide rang of job opportunities within reasonable commute times. Policies: C 2.1 The County has established, as Countrywide target widritt community development areas, a Level of Service "D"along all County maintained toads and conventional State Highways except thaz LOS "E" may be allowed in urban areas only az intersections of any combination of Major Streets, Arterials, Urban Arterials, Expressways, or conventional State Highways .sit}ri[I one mile o(a freeway imerchange and also az freeway ramp intersecions. LOS "E" would only be allowed, subjeM to Board of Supervisor approval, in those instances where mitigazion of LOS °D" is deemed to be impractical or in designated community centers "uy tight". Outside Corrtmunity Development Areas, the level of service target is "C" along all County maintained roads and conventional State Highways except thaz LOS "D" may be allowed in urban areas only az intersections of any combination of Major Streets, Arterials, Urban Arterials, Expressways, or conventional State Highways within one mile of a freeway interchange and also az freeway ramp intersections. Area Plan policies could either b~ more or less restrictive depending upon the adopted Area Plan. C 2.2 Maintain the existing trrrtsponation network, while providing for future C-! WORKWRQ/ECTSVfC1PICIRCEfFAfEA7VOLIGES~CEPOLICIFS! 16WORD.DDC County of Riverside General Plan -~D~aft Circulation L• lement ,::, _ ,. ~: ~' ;< expansion and improvement based on travel demand, and the developmem of alternative navel modes. Local Agency Coordination The County has the desire to provi integrated with that of adjacent jurist maintain a high level ofinter-govern the circulation and transportation pl assure that regional transportation pl The County recognizes that the land development process and that it wi compared to earlier patterns of deve a circulation (arterial highway) plan that is [ions. To accomplish this goal, the County must ental coordination and citizen participation in aing process and work with other agencies to s are consistent with the County's General Plan e/transportation connection is a key part ofthe serve to reduce the number of vehicle trips C 2.4 Incorporate as part of the Circulation Element: the Regional Transportation Plan, the Riverside County Congestion Managemem Program, the Expenditure Plan for Measure "A"and the Riverside County Short-and Long- Range Trandt Plans. C 2.5 Coordinate with planning agencies such as Caltrarts, RGTC, WRCOG, and the tides on carious studies relating to freeway, High Occupancy Velucle/I-Iigh Occupancy Toll Lanes (HOV/I-IOT1, and transportation corridor planning, construction, and improrrement in order to facilitate the planning and implementation of an integrated circulation s~";tem. C 2.6 The County Transporiation L and all adjacent counties improvement standards for boundaries. Detailed pros following: 1. For development u boundaries, but w; having roadway st County staff will o design standards ft negotiate logical tr. 2. In general, for suc within the SOI of should apply if the logically occur in t annexation seems Standards should a~ 3. Transition areas a differing City and classifications shoe satisfactory operati County should updr this policy and stan~ agencies. artment Nill work with all incorporated cities coordinate right-of-way requirements and ~neral Plan roads which cross jurisdictional ues have been developed and include the fen the County jurisdiction outside of a city's tin the Sphere of Influence (SOI) of a city tdards different from the County, City and tperate and agree on a reasonable choice of the pariiculaz circumstances involved, and sitions from City to County Standards. development under County jurisdiction but n incorporated jurisdiction, City Standards laffs concur that annexation to the City will short [o intermediate range future. Where oubtful into the long-term future, County meeting points of roadways designed [o County Standards or differing functional Id be individually designed to facilitate mat and safety performance. Further, the e the Road Standards to reflect the intent of uds agreed upon by the County and other local iverside General Plan - Draft f , .~; System Design, Construction and Maintenance ~~ The County's sveet and highway system must be planned, designed, conswcted, ~opera[ed, Incentives end the competitive need to "reisetmplemented, and maintained in a manner that the ba/'in creeang communities o/SUpports the economy and maintains personal excellence commonlystimulate fhen'obiltty, and promotes safety, convenience, and developmentcommunitytoexceedfheefficiency. The County's roadway network must normso/developmentstenderdsalso be consistent and uniform throughout the ~~County. To accomplish this, the County should establish a functional classification system for -RCIP Visionmajor highways, with set minimum right-of--way and design standards, and identify needed roadway improvements. Policies: C 2.7 County roadways shall be designed, conswcted, and maintained as specified in Ordinance No. 461, County Road Improvement Standards and Specifications. C 2.8 Projects that propose an increase in currently approved density and intensity of land use, must prepare a vaffic analysis that evaluates the long-term impacts of the project, demonsvating that the planned road system can support the proposed project, together with those land uses already allowed in the area. The analysis would project average daily vaffic of roadway links for the buildout situation ofthe entire area to demonsvate conformance with the target Level of Service standards. In addition, any individual development proposal may be required to provide a vaffic analysi~ to assess peak hour impacts at affected intersections, identifying needed mitigation measures to achieve or maintain the target Level of Service. A traffic study may not be necessary in every situation, such as when the project area is known to have existing deficiencies or the size of the project will not have a significant impact upon and will not change the exisiing Level of Service. Also, certain types of projects, due to the vip generation characteristics, may add virtually no traffic to the peak hour vaffic vohtmes. These types of projects may be exempt from the vaffic study requirements. Whether a particular project qualifies for an exemption will be determined by the Transportation Department. Projects that have substantial vagc impacts may have ovemding benefits that would be desirable even [hough the Level of Service Standards cannot be met. Examples might be projects that provide jobs in a local aiea to aid in meeting regional air quality and mobility goals, projects thatserve to provide needed vansporiation improvements that would not otherwise be conswcted, or projects that provide some unique benefit to thei County, which would outweigh the vaffic impacts. Projects that may qualify as having overriding benefits tvould be required to analyze vaffic impacts and mitigate such impacts to the extent that it is economically feasible as determined by the Board of Supervisors. Proponents of thesetypes of projects shall be required to provide a value engineering analysis in order to determine the level of improvements that would be considered economically feasible. ~ ci irow:versorFaswcmrracr:rrxrF,vrwotrctes~ceroricrrs~ zeiva~.nec ~ Page Cfi Coun 1 of Riverside General Plan -Draft Circulation Element C 2.9 Special event uses should Vaffic generators because and vaffic trips are usually Vaffic management plan w Vaffic. Also, a Vaffic n measures needed to serve must exist for these types o; to the maximum level poss C 2.10 Any project that would ex Vaffic analysis, would be re Level of Service to the tar conswction of all improve Service, by payment of a fei in place, or by any other apI exceed the tazget level, compliance with standazd improvements or payment impact for each developme C 2.11 Implement design HIGHWAY 4 ((}~~ s T '`_::: . t be evaluated by the same criteria as typical Vaffic patterns for these uses are not typical x at peak hours (e.g., stadium events, etc.). A be required for these uses in order [o manage tagement plan must include Vaffic control ajor events at the site. Adequate circulation evelopment and all impacts must be alleviated ed the target Level of Service, based on the sired to miligate the Vaffic impacts [o bring the :t level. Such impacts may be mitigated by ents necessary to achieve the target Level of tr fees if an appropriate funding mechanism is ipriate means. If the projected traffic does not itiga[ion may include, but not limited to, rnditions of approval, or the conswction of f fees necessary to mitigate the incremental proposal. that identify intersection improvements Classification # of Through Lanes Along Arterial Segment Intersection Tum Lanes Required for intersection w/secondary highway and above Lefr Right Expressway 6 ~ 2 2 Urban Arterial 6 ~ 2 1 Arterial Highway 4 or 6 ~ 2 1 Ma'or Hi wa 4 ~ 2 1 SecondaN Hi hwav 4 ~ I 1 Collector Highways 2 ~ N/A N/A ~ Six lanes may be required for maintained by TLMA C 2.12 Roundabouts or other innc thorough Vaffic impact ass such an intersection design and is physically and econt C 2.13 Design a comprehensive, arterial highways as indicated a listing design solutions may be allowed when a it has been conducted demonstrating that [ive would improve traffic flow such safety v feasible. collector road system in developing areas. C 2.14 All major subdivisions shall) be required to provide adequate collector road networks designed to feed ~affic onto general planned highways. C 2. ] 5 Improvement of streets and highways serving as access to developing commercial, industrial antl residential areas shall primarily be the responsibility of the private developer. These may include roadconswction or widening, installation of turning lanes and Vaffic signals, and the April 24, 2001 Page C-7 iverside Generat Plan - Draft improvement of any drainage facility or other auxiliary facility the safe and efficient movement of traffic or the protection of r C 2.16 Interior collector street systems for commercial and industrial shall be designed to accommodate the movement of heavy tru C 2.17 Restrict heavy duty trucks in residential and town center areas. C 2.18 Off-sveet loading facilities that do not face surrounding roadways or residential neighborhoods for all new commercial and industrial developments shall be required. C 2.19 Private and public land developments shall berequired to provide'all on-site auxiliary facility improvements necessary to mitigate any development generated circulation impacts. A review of each proposed land development project shall be undertaken to identify project impacts [o the circulation system and its auxiliary facilities. The Transportation Departrhent may require developers and/or subdividers to provide traffic impact studies prepared by qualified professionals to identify the impacts of a devi ]opment. C 2.20 Arterial highways shall be identified on a map and improve i as area development and highway needs warrant. C2.21 Wheneverpossible,improvementssha]Ibemadewithfmancingmechattisms that equally-distribute the cost of road improvements among thoseiwho will benefit. C 2.22 I-Iighways serving as Arterials through mountainous and rural area's shall be improved to adequately meet travel demands, while minimizing the need for excessive cut and fill. C 2.23 All street intersections shall be designed to assure [he safe, e1 of through traffic and the negotiation of turning movements. C 2.24 Curves and grades shall be designed to permit safe movement of Lehiculaz traffic at the road's design speed. Design speed should be consistent with and compliment character of the adjacent area. C 2.25 Sight distances shall be adequate to provide for safe vehicular movi ent at a road's design speed and at all intersections. C 2.26 Necessary rights-of-way dedications shall be made by developers) and land dividers as part of the land division and ]and use review processes. C 2.27 Rights-of--way dedications shall be aligned to match up with) existing dedications along adjacent parcels and shall be of a width consistent within the ultimate design standazd of [he road. C 2.28 Dedications outside the road rights-of--way may be necessary to'establish slope stability or drainage structures. These dedications shall be made by land dividers or developers dttring the ]and division and land use review process to the responsible agency. C 2.29 Road rights-of--way and improvements shall be primarily detemtin~dby land C:! WORXWRWECTStRCIPICIRCE1FAfEA'rIPOLlC1ESICEPOLICIE51 ]RWORD.DOC Page C-S County of Riverside General Plan -~Drat't Crreulation Element use and navel demand. C 2.30 Land divisions involving p as agriculture on the Gene reduction in improvement C 2.31 Through traffic movements avoid stree[sthrough reside for highways capable of cal major trip generators. C 2.32 Traffic calming techniques community local street and where such techniques will i neighborhoods. C 2.33 The street network should vehicles, meeting requires specified by [he Fire Depl C 2.34 On-sweet parking shall be congestion. System Financing Discretionary roadway improvement and promote convenient, safe and eff This can be accomplished through Improvement Program" of road an expansion of the existing freeway and of a viable transportation system n Innovative options such as the applic explored as a means of controlling d must consider these and other innovat transportation system is financially st Policies: ., €<.•~ ~ ~~ :,,, . els greater than 20 acres in size and designated Plan Land Use Map shall be considered for a be limited to general plan roads and shall neighborhoods. Provisions shall be made high volumes of through traffic between rld be considered in the design of new systems and within existing communities ve safety and traffic flow through sensitive le a quick and efficient route for emergency width, tum around radii and other factors as when necessary, to reduce vaffic nds should be allocated to enhance mobility ent transport of people, goods and materials. ntinued development of a "Transportation bridge improvements. Inves[menl in and terial street nebvork is critical to theprovision :ssary to sustain a healthy level economy. on of "Toll-wan fares" should continue to be rand in critical corridors. Riverside County :funding mechanisms to ensure that the future toned and can be adequately maintained. C 2.35 The County Transportatio Department shall annually prepare a Transportation Improvemen[~Program, which lists all projects scheduledfor improvement during the next 5 to 7 years. This program is a multi-year program, reviewed and updated annually. C 2.36 The County shall particip~ mitigation fees and/or road t new development. The fees providing local and subregi serving new development in are defined as those improve development. C 2.37 Encourage the use of road of road improvements improvements. in the establishment of regional traffic bridge benefits districts to be assessed on 111 cover a reasonable share of the costs of d transportation improvements needed for unincorporated area. Local improvements nts to streets within the impact area of new tent financing mechanisms, with the cost those who benefit from the road L9, LUUI iverside General Plan - Draft ~. - C 2.38 Review and update the County fee swcture for development impact fees annually to provide an ongoitig mechanism to ensure that projects are developed and constructed in a timely manner. System Access Access to [he County's street and highway system must be designed, constructed, operated, implemented, and maintained in a manner that supports the economy and maintains personal mobility, and promotes safety, convenience, and efficiency. Further, access to the County's roadway network must be consistent and uriifonn. Policies: C 2.39 Dedicated and recorded public access shall be provided to all except as provided for under the statutes of the State of Calm C 2.40 All weather access shall be provided to all developed areas. C 2.41 Access points and intersections of streets and highways shall be limited based upon the road's classification and function. C 2.42 Parcel access points taken directly off general planned highways shall be discouraged. C 2.43 Access may be permitted off general planned highways only ifno local streets are present. C 2.44 Whenever access must be taken directly off a General Planned Highway ,common access shall be provided via shared driveways and/or reciprocal access easements. Parcels on opposite sides of a highibay shall have access points located directly opposite each other, whenever possible, to allow for future street intersections and increased safety. Public Transportation System tyeneral Riverside County understands the need to promote development of a safe, efficient, convenient and economical communiTy, intercommuniTy and countywide public transportation system. In addition, it is important to encourage increased ridership on public transit systems and increased use of alternative modes, including bicycles and walking. The Land Use Element describes the critical nature of the patterns and densities of development for a successful public transportation system. To accomplish this goal, the County supports reliable, efficient, and effective paratranstt service throughout the Counry, by encouraging development of service that satisfies vansit needs of the elderly and physically handicapped. Further, the County continues to support fixed-route, scheduled bus services, which will have convenient access to major population, economic, institutional, recreation centers, communiTy centers and activity centers. Policies: C:1 R'ORKIPROlECT5L4CIPiCIRCEL64fEMWOL1ClE51CFPL7GClESI 76WmtD.OGL^ County of Riverside General Plan -~D~aft Clement E ~: C 3.1 The County, through the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and development of the Short- and Long-Range Transit Plans, should identify short- and long-range vansit needs and maximize revenue sources utilizing all funding mechanisms including federal grants, state enabling legislation, and fargbox revenue. C 3.2 Support vansit operator's programs to foster vansit usage. C 3.3 Utilize community centers and concenvated development areas in the future land use patterns [o facilitate, mul[imodal vansportation Paratransit Service C 3.4 Support programs of vansit agencies/operators to provide paravansit service. Fixed Route Transit Service C 3.5 Reserve right-of--way for designated vansit service. C 3.6 Developments that are identified as major trip atvactions (i.e. community centers, commeretal and emplo}rsnent centers) shall inwtporate [he potential for public transit service in their design, as indicated in Ordinance No. 460, Regulating the Division of Land of the County of Riverside. C 3.7 Support the coordination of express and local bus routes by establishing a series of transit centers or vansier sites and supportive park- and-ride lots in Riverside County. Transit centers shou]d be located: 1) maximize the use of conventional public vansit, 2) provide adequate off- street parking for communrty centers and activity centers, 3) provide convenient pedestrian access from community or activity centers, and 4) avoid arterials with heavy traffic and congestion. Transit centers should be designed to enhance public convenience and provide mulit-modal i connections to the community. C 3.g Accommodate the vansit corridors and ancillary facilities (including Vansit stations for rail and bus operations) identified through the Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) and the Riverside County Integrate Project (RCIP) planning process along the transit spine network. C 3.9 Design the physical layout grid geometries of arterial and collector highways to facilitate bus operations. C 3.10 Offer incentives to new development if they locate in transit-oriented areas such as in community centers or along designated vansit corridors near stations and also accommodate vansit through higher densities, innovative design, and right-of--way dedication. rage ea r iverside General Plan - Draft Rail System The freight and passenger rail systems in Riverside County are vital to the mobility and economy of the region. Riverside County will continue to support operation of passenger and freight rail systems that offer efficient, safe, convenient andeconomica] transport of County residents and commodities. The proposed Califomiahigh-speed rail system will direclly serve residents and businesses in Riverside County, enabling the County to compete in the global economy. The County will also continue to encourage rail passenger improvements and the efficient movement of goods by rail through development of efficient intermoda] freight facilities and a shift of a portion of the goods previously moved by trucks onto the rail freight system. Further, every effort wit I be made to reduce conflicts between rail and other modes of vans}~ortation (particularly the highway system). Riverside County will thoroughly consider issues surrounding the abandonment of rail lines so that the lines are preserved for other vansportation uses. Policies: C 4. ] Support continued development and implementation of the Measure A Rail Program including new rail lines and stations, the proposed California High Speed Rail System with at least two (2) stations in Riverside CounryG, andthe proposed Intercity Rail Corridor between Calexico and Los Angeles. C 4.2 Support continued improvements to AMTRAK and MevoLinl: rail passenger service within Riverside County and throughout the Southern California Region. C 4.3 Support implementation of the San Jacinto Branch Line to planned industrial development. C 4.4 Improve or reconstruct existing grade separations as necessary for the smooth flow of traffic within the Counrv consistent with plans developed by WRCOG and CVAG. C 4.5 Provide additional grade crossing improvements as determined by the California Public Utilities Commission and the County. C 4.6 Reserve the future use of rail right-of--way for alternative transportation purposes in cooperation with comdor communities so that an integrated and mutually supportive set of Vansporia[ion projects may be defiped for Riverside County. C 4.7 Alternatives for intermodal shipment should be addressed for affected by abandonment of rail facilities. C 4.8 Locate future transit stops in community centers and/or major activity areas (high concenvations of employment and residential uses). C:i If'ORKIPRQ/ECISVtCIPICIRCELEIIEATPOLICIESICEPOLIClESl 76WORD.DOC County of Riverside General Plan -~D~aft Circulation ff AirpoAS serving the County are tied into the regional air Uenspottation system end operate es an e/ficient end convenient transportation made to accommodate the traveling needs of the people and move selected goods quickly in the highly competitive infemetional marketplace ~~ -RCIP Vision Eti Aviation System The provision of general aviation fat residrnts of Riverside County is Vansportation svstem. To meet these n County airport plans with aviation I Economic Development Agency, and 1 and fmancing. It will also be importar airport facilities for general aviation a from rncroachmrnt of future develol extreme noise from aircraft as defined residents and businesses are tied into airports must continue to operate effici accommodate future Vaveling needs a County should coordinate with Vansit hies and services that meet the needs of [he n important component of the Counn~'s ads, the County must facilitate coordination of arming conducted by the State, the County cal agencies related to Vansportation, land use for the County to continue to provide civilian 9 emergency purposes and to protect airports Went within areas that would be subject to i the Noise Element. Airports used by County re regional air vansportation system. These ntly and provide convenient Vansporta[ion to id the movement of goods. In addition, the gencies to provide connections to pass Politics: C ~.l Ensure the developmrnt of specified in the Riverside C lpriate land uses near County airports, as Airport Land Use Plan. C 5.2 Implement and maintain Airport Land Use Policy Plans for public use airports to address compatible land use designations, noise issues and safety considerations within and adjacent to each airport facility. C 5.3 The County, in coordination enforce federal and State rt airport facilities. the Economic Development Agency, shall (ions related to land use planning around C 5.4 Recognize and Port General Plan and It C 5.5 Consider development and circulation improvements on airport faci C 5.6 Minimize adverse enviror surrounding communities Airport Land Use Plan. C 5.7 Recommend flight patterns sensitive neighborhoods. policies contained in the March Air Cargo Fund Access Plan. implications associated with adjacent and promote efficient and safe access and safety impacts of County airports on i implementation of the Riverside County new and existing airports to avoid noise Non-motorized Riverside Countv should establish safe use of non-motorized modes of trans character of the County. I[ will also b among residential neighborhoods, t recreational facilities. To satisfy the rte the region, options to the automobile at In addition, a comprehensive Vail sys provides access to the County's many d nd convenient facilities to accommodate the oration to enhance the future liability and important to provide non-motorized access tploymen[ centers, shopping areas, and I for mobility within the towns and throughout public Vansit systems should be developed. m should be planned in such a way that i[ verse recreational opportunities. Thebikeway April 24, 2001 iverside General Plan - Draft network in the unincorporated area should provide non-motorized altema[ives for commuter navel as well as recreational opportunities. Further, Riverside Count}' should encourage safe pedestrian walkways within commercial office, industrial, residential and recreational developments that also adhere to the American with Disability Act (ADA) requvements. Most importantly, to ensure that the non- mo[orized system is implemented, Riverside County should actively seek all iavailable means of financing such improvements including State and federal grants. Policies: General C 6. ] Encourage the use of existing railroad right-of--ways for facilities, where appropriate. C 6.2 Encourage and support maintenance of existing non-motorized facilities. C 6.3 Whenever economically and physically possible, provide separate rights of way for non-motorized nails. C 6.4 Promote coordination in planning, design, construction and implettjen[ation standazds, where applicable, among the County, Calvans, the Cities, WRCOG, CVAG, RCTC, and other agencies to provide integrated non- motorized trails to maximize safety and minitnize potential conflicts with pedestrian and motor vehicles. Recreational Trails C 6.5 The Riverside County General Plan ~ ~ Regional Trails Map Figure XX and policies depict conceptual trail aligmnents within Trail Alignment Planning Corridors. The precise alignment of a nail within a Trail Alignment Planning Corridor~shall be Mulfipuryose regional open space end i community/neigh6orhoodpu6licspaees erebased on the physical characteristics of the ea and permanent elements otthe Riverside CountyFonsider connections to recreationial~ areas, landscape.employment centers, community centers, res~tdential ~ areas and vansit centers. Where practical, v~ils shall be aligned along road rights-of-way and flood control and utility easements. C 6.6 Recreation nails within [he County right-of--way shall have a public agency responsible for maintenance. C 6.7 Concurrent with the approval of any development proposal, all dequired ultimate trail rights-of-way and easements must be identified, dedicated and approved and determined to be consistent with the goals, objectives policies and Recreation Trails Plan Map of the General Plan and withcurrent Riverside County design criteria, standards, and practices. Plans for recreation trails must illustrate how nails systems integrate with backbone trails, environmental corridors, recreational facilities, and schools. C 6.g Design the recreation trail system to utilize drainage courses and waterways, canal easements, levees, environmental corridors, power-line easements and other public rights-of--way whenever possible. C:~ a'ONKWROJECrSViCIP1CIRCELFMEMI1bLIC1ESK'EPOLICIESI ]6WORDDOC 1:-19 County of Riverside General Plan -Draft Circulation Element ~ C 6.9 Development conditions of improvements may be utilize maintrnance costs. Private implemrntation and maims existing and new private de. Bikeways C 6.10 Bikeways shall be den the Caltrans Highway E~ ~a ~~ pproval, or other methods of financing such I by the County to address implementation and entities will be solely responsible for the ranee of recreation trails contained within incompliance with the standards established in Manual or other appropriate standards. C 6.11 Provide for bicycle Vavel onarterial highways as depicted on the Regional Trail Plan Map Figure XX. 'Bicycle navel will also be accommodated on arterial highways during roadway construction, widening or other improvements, whenever feasible and practical. C 6.12 Encourage othermodes of tr sportation (buses, trains, etc.) to plan for, and provide space for carrying recreational and commuting bicyclists on public transportation systems where feasible. C 6.13 Review and update the Regional Trail Map as needed, in order [o assure compatibility with the other elements of the County General Plan, and with the bikeways plans of WRC G, CVAG, RCTC, the Cities, and adjacent counties. C 6.14 The County shall ~onsider bicycle transportation needs in the review of development prolects, and where appropriate, should require provision of bicycle access between a proposed development and other parts of the County through dedication of easements and conswction of bicycle access ways which connect with other bicycle access ways. C 6.15 Solicit and utilize all sources of local, regional, State, and federal funds to plan, acquire right-of--way for, and construct bikeways. Pedestrian Facilities C 6.16 Appropriate facilities shall within developments, as Regulating the Division of C 6.17 Encourage removal of convenient movement the needs of disabled n C 6.1g Assure pedestrian access routes and terminal facilit C 6.19 The County shall plan for p projects. The County shall consistent with road design sidewalks and timing ofvaffi shall be included. rvided for the safe movement of pedestrians ied in the attached Ordinance No. 460, of the County of Riverside. s (walls, easements, and fences) for safe and strians. Specialemphasisshou]dbeplacedon considering ADA regulations. developmrnt to existing and future transit destrian access in designing street and road continue its requirement for such facilities standards. Provision of pedestrian paths or signals to allow safe pedestrian street crossing 124 2001 C ~ WORKI^RQ/EC75WCIP~C/RCEfE4EMV(XJCIFSICFXX.ICIES! ]6WORD.DOC Pegc C-15 __ ~ ~ =- iverside General Plan - Draft C 6.20 The Counry should work with local to enswe that school children have adequate transportation rou such as a local pedestrian or bike path, or local bus service. C 6.21 Assure appropriate pedestrian and future transit routes and terminal facilities. ff Scenic Corridors We ere proud o/the disfinctive identities that An important goal of the County is to preserve and our communises now possess end cherish I the sense ofplece that results Irom fhem.enhance the region's unique or special aesthetic We went this sense ofplace and~d visual resowces through sensitive highway distinctivenessmainfeinedendenhencedir~esign and [he regulation of development within our planning and development ectivilies.scenic corridors. This can be accomplished ~~through the coordination of maintenance, enhancement, and development of existing and new scenic corridors with Caltrans, RCTC, CVAG, WRCOG, the cities, and the development community aimed at preserving the aesthetic qualities of the environment. 6i Policies: The development o/scenic highways will riot C 7.1 Preserve scenic routes that have exceptional only add fo the pleasure o/the residents ofor unique visual featwes in accordan~ a with this State, but will also play en important roleCaltrans' Scenic Highways Plan. in encouraging the growth o(the recreation and tourist industries upon which theC 7.2 Where necessary to preserve unique or special visual features, impose conditions on development within a scenic highway corridor to require dedication of scenic easements consistent with Caltrans' Scenic Highways Plan and discussed in the Land Use Element. C 7.3 Where feasible, utilize contour grading and slope rounding to gradually transition graded road slopes into the natwal configwa[ion consistent with the topography of the area. ~~ Environmental Considerations Riverside CountyisefemilyofspecielThe County's transportation system must be planned, designed, conswcted, operated, and communities in a remarkable environmentalimplemented in a manner that maintains a high setting.level of environmental quality. Transportation 99system improvements should be implemented to minimize distwbance of the natwal environment • RCIPVsionand other sensitive environmental features~covered under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) guidelines. Policies: C 8.1 All development proposals shall be reviewed to inswe that pres anon of specimen trees within road rights-of--way when at all possible. C: i WORKV'RQIECTSWCIPIC(RCfl~A¢MiPOLC/ESICEPOL/C/fS1_]6WORD.A^C Yage C-16 County of Riverside General Plan -~Oraft Circulation Element ~ .: ~ ,: E C 8.2 Al] roadways IocateA within identified flood areas shall beprovided with adequate flood control reasures. C 8.3 Roadways shall be possible. C 8.4 Dust shall be C 8.5 All road C 8.6 A]I sweets and shat] be protected from I C 8.7 Adequate measures transportation generated m landscaped beams, other sow shall be provided along free order to project adjacent not noise impacts. outside identified flood plains whenever during all stages of roadway conswction. shall be protected from blowing sand. located within identified blowsand areas hazards. .all be taken to project County residents from e hazards. Increased setbacks, walls, absorbing barriers, or a combination thereof ys, expressways and four lane highways m -sensitive land uses from traffic-generated C 8.8 Specific requirements of t}%e Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) shall be incorporated into transportationplans and development proposals, where applicable. C 8.9 Alignments for new roadway , or for improvements to existing roadways and other transportation system improvements, should avoid, wherever practicable, disturbance of existing communities, and biotic resource areas. C 8.10 Implement the Circulation Plan in a manner consistent with federal, State and local environmental quality standards and regulations. C 8.11 Review and monitor propose suitable products and mates impacts. In particular regt chemical or gas leakage and C 8.12 Specific requirements of incorporated into transpc applicable. Transportation Systems rr expansion of pipelines for the transport of and require mitigation of environmental mitigation of the potential for hazardous General Plan Air Quality Element shall be rn plans and development proposals where Riverside County should implement 'transportation systems management (TSM) swlegies that enhance traffic flow and reduce travel delay along the unincorporated County roadway system. We must make the efficient use of our current and future road network. Priority should be given to Transportation SystemManagemen[ (TSM) strategies that improve level of service, especially in areas that are currently fully developed, before more costs and descriptions capacity increasing strategic are used. Policies: C 9.1 Enhance the uninterrupted movement of vehicles along bus routes by providing bus tumours. April I4, 2001 iverside General Plan - Draft C 9.2 Encourage [he use of HO V lanes. Such lanes should be continuous, linking major population centers t~'ith emplo}mtent centers. IfHOV lanes are used, make them available for mixed flow traffic dttring non-peak periids where warranted and feasible. C 9.3 Priority shall be given to Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies to improve level of service, particulazly in areas which are currently fully developed. C 9.4 Traffic signals shall be constructed and improved at appropriate intersections. Whenever possible, traffic signals should be spaced to optimize Vaffic operation and facilitate signal coordination. C 9.5 Roadway expansion at public expense to relieve congestion shall only be considered once it has been determined that TSM measures will not be effective. C 9.6 Auxiliary lanes shall be installed whenever necessary [o relieve congestion and safety hazards. C 9.7 Installation of one-way streets; exclusive or reversible lanes shall be undertaken where applicable. Transportation Demand Management Transportation demand management (TDM) strategies that reduce dependedceon the single-occupant vehicle and enhance mobility along congested corridors are an important priority for the management of the County's transportation system. Such strategies shou]d be consistent tt~th Rule 1501 of the South Coast Airl Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the County Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Guidelines. Policies: C 10.1 The County shall continue with implementation of its TDtvl Design Guidelines. The goal of the TDM Guidelines is to reduce single occupant motor vehicle tops during peak hours and modify the vehicular demand for travel to increase the ability of the existing system to carry more people., C 10.2 Coordinate with Caltrans and other responsible agencies to identify theneed for additional park-n-ride facilities along major commuter travel c~omdors. C 10.3 Developments that are identified as major trip attracters (i.e., commercial and emplo}intent centers) shall incorporate the potential for public Vansit service in their design. Goods Movement/Designated Truck Routes The efficient movement of goods in and through Riverside County is vital to the Inland Empire's economy and will improve traveler safety. This can be accomplished through design, construction and maintenance of the regional and local sUeet and highway system. The CounTy should identify street and highway improvement and C-i wpR/,MROIECISUtC1PiC/RCE(F.M1fEM1POLlCIESiCEPOL1ClESI :6WORD.DOC Count Circulation ,: „,~?r. ~: , ~~ ~~~ °'~ ': maintenance projects [hat will improv i goods movements and implement the projects [hat are economically feasible. Policies: C 1 I.l Street and highway projects should be implemented so that goods movement can continue to be convenient and economical in areas where large concentrations of truck traffic] exist. C 11.2 Where extensive truck navel snvolving regional movement of bulk goods is anticipated, roadway standards to accommodate large trucks should be implemented. C 113 Support continued operation safe, convenient and econos C 11.4 Support provisions to phys heavily traveled sweets and Intelligent Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems (I1 communications, and computer systen the regional transporia[ion system. information exchange between drivers cars and smart highways. These tech forms of transportation including publi allows drivers and other system user: traffic conditions, alternate routes, and The Inland Empire ITS Strategic P Transportation Commission in 1997 m The Plan contains a list of goals and p within the County to achieve a viable enhances safety within the region. of Riverside General Plan -Daft ie regional freight rail system, which offers transport of commodities. separate heavily traveled rail lines from (ITS) i) involves the use of advanced electronics, s that increase the efficiency and safety along These technologies can provide real-time and the roads, giving rise to the terms smart ologies have also expanded to include other transportation, rail, and goods movement. ITS access to up-to-the-minute information on iirections to unfamiliar destinations. 1 was approved by the Riverside County outlines future plans for ITS implementation. icies to be followed by responsible agencies 'S infrastructure that improves mobility and Comment Letters From Other From: Dan Silver <dsilveda@earthlink.net> To: Cathy Bechtel <CBECHTEL@rctc.org>, ""Sf, <steve.smith@transcore.com>, AI Bell <abell@planningcenter. <rramella@planningcenter.com>, Melani Smith <msmith@plar Date: 8/17/01 8:14AM Subject: Comments on drat Circulation Element August 14, 2001 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY Cathy Bechtel Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Ave. Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Comments on draft Circulation Element The Endangered Habitats League (EHL) appreciates the oppoi comment on the draft Circulation Element policies. As you know, Southern California organization dedicated to ecosystem protecti~ land use planning, and collaborative conflict resolution. C 1.11 Should bring in the Transit Oasis concept here C 2.1 Should not Area Plan levels of service be consistent with the Plan, that is, equal or better? C 2.8 (second paragraph) Regarding requiring traffic studies, what the cumulative impact of of numerous "insignificant" projects? Are ~ traffic studies needed for cumulative impacts? C 2.10 Should include project denial as a potential outcome for unr traffic impacts. C 2.22 The purpose of this confusing policy is unclear. Is it about mandating a particular type of highway project or about landform im Why is there an absolute requirement to construct improvements to traffic demand' "shall" is used' irrespective of availability of funds, cost-benefit of the project, environmental impacts, community impai The "shall" preempts the normal decision-making process, which tai account a full range of factors. Also, the notion of "minimizing exce: cut and fill" is internally contradictory. Suggest: If highways serving as arterials through mountainous and rural a improved to meet travel demand, cut and fill shall be minimized. C 2.33 Road standards should not be delegated to the Fire Dept. up-front action plan to permit narrower streets. ," STEVE A." >, Dick Ramella center.com> lily to IL is a improved etc. into are need an C 3.7 Need to bring in the Oasis concept here. C 3.10 Should also state that underlying land use designations antl speck plan requirements should support transit. C 6.18 Should add that these features will be implemented design. C 9.5 Developer fees should be used for fair share financing. Sincerely, Dan Silver, Coordinator cc: Steve Smith Dick Ramella AI Bell Melani Smith Interested parties Dan Silver, Coordinator Endangered Habitats League 8424-A Santa Monica Blvd., #592 Los Angeles, CA 90069-4267 TEL 323-654-1456 FAX 323-654-1931 CELL 213-804-2750 d silverla @ea rth I in k. net project Comments from the General Plan ~.dvisory Committee i n Circulation Element Policie. Discussed August 7, 2001 • Serious issues existing with street design. They heea to be ironed out with the County, BIA, and fire department. They aze moitly issues with local streets, not necessarily with the General Plan roadways. • Make swe terms aze defined • Counry should have a database that is updated in with other planning elements • Need to identify right-of--way requirements for fi accommodate buildout. Need to show these on < something similar. Also needs to show on circu] • Need to emphasize the importance of resolving t • Policy C1.5 -delete the word "current" • Policy C2.4 -Need to have a brief summary or d documents mentioned in this policy • Policy C2.6.1 -Don't burden the county with toi resolve as much up front as possible • Policy C2.7 -Perhaps the policies referring to O should include amplify on she principles in those • Policy C2.17 -change "heary duty" to "through Policy C2.31 -Reword -confusing • Policy C2.33 -Important, but don't give Fire De • Policies on fixed route transit service -Need to r definitions -activity center, transfer site, transit ; mentioned. • Policy C4.6 -Should cross-reference policies on real time, linking transportation re expansion of freeways to r plans as an overlay zone or on plans. CPTC restriction on the 91 of each of the many negotiations -try to Nos. 460 and 461 rtment carte blanche dify terms a~~d/or provide ';e network. Transit oasis not space • Policy C6.5 -Cross-reference related policies • Policy C6.7 -Reference provisions for privac., and security -who is going to take caze of trails? • Policy C6.17 -Add words on maximizing visibi] Also add words on pedestrian safety, lighting, et< Policies on scenic comdors -Should be more spy open space policies. • Policy C8.4 - Dust is not the only construction it more generic issue • Policies on transportation system management - • Policies on goods movement -Need discussion t: and access for pedestrians. :d cross-reference back to -maybe reference as a vide definitions in mazgin Riverside Co. lies in the path of transportation from Asia and Mexico Proposed Policies for Circt Submitt~d by Bruce August 7, 2001 Congestion Relief Standard Discussion The consultant team is proposing to downgrade the standard in the Circulation Element. Downgrading the Stan • lower the quality of life, and make Riverside Cou place to live or work • make air quality worse by increasing the amount of • increase people's waiting times in traffic by 50 per areas - a 10-minute wait in lights now will become standard Element nty's existing congestion relief ~ would: a more congested, less desirable gyp-and-go traffic nt in the Community Development 15-minute wait under the proposed • allow LOS F in the Community Centers when combined with Policy 2.8, which means that people's waiting times in traffic wi1T be three times longer -await for one traffic light change now to get through an intersection, will take three light changes to get through an intersection in the Community Centers under the proposed standard. The cumulative effect of traffic impacts is almost invariabl ~ one level-of-service worse than was planned. Therefore, keeping the existing standard would provide the needed cushion to mitigate for future, cumulative traffic impacts. In addition, downgrading appears unnecessary because the Circulation Element traffic model shows that the existing standard is easily achievable for County arterials in the proposed, enhanced circulation network. The existing standard provides much discretionary flexibili higher LOS within one mile of a freeway or that provide o LOS standards. This flexibility allows the standards to planned urbanized areas. Since land use densities alre; RCIP General Plan, the congestion standard would not alter The Committee should propose a standard representing its w regarding congestion relief. Several factors are involved common in local jurisdictions in the mid-1980's, however at was unwilling to pay for the improvements to meet LOS C, the norm for local jurisdictions in Southern California. H improvements has become more advanced in recent years th assessment districts, making the payment for improvemi Numerous specific plans throughout the County already havt County's existing congestion relief standard. The consults highways. More "efficient" use of highways simply means ~ Because people's preference for what is an acceptable perception, the issue becomes a political decision. The pu to approve projects that require a riding benefits but don't meet the lapt to increased densities in the have been established by the planned densities. derstanding of the public preference The LOS C standard wa: more the time, the public expressed that it and as a result, LOS D has become >wever, financing of transportation •ough the use of mitigation fees and nts more equitable and palatable. been planned and entitled using the tts propose more "efficient" use of tore congestion. el of congestion is a matter of expressed a strong preference for congestion relief in the public opinion surveys con wane to see congestion reduced from present levels. February 2001 RCTC study, which found that 74 funding transportation projects to reduce congestion. Reouested Policy Re-word Policy C.2.1 to use the wording of the County's Reouested Policy Use the County's existing congestion relief standard in the Build-Out Freeway and Transit ROW Discussion Caltrans' ultimate freeway design concept does not include traffic needs of Riverside County; therefore, the Calt sufficiently to relieve the congestion of build-out traffic in Circulation Element traffic model forecast -which incorl design concept -show that freeways in the County at bui LOS F conditions are chazacterized by the formation of bay and-go traffic that are extremely unstable. In order to reli ROW will be needed than that shown by Caltrans. For Elsinore Corridor joins I-15, that portion of I-15 may ne current 5-lane design concept provides. The policy being proposed would bridge the public infc ROW shown by Caltrans on its ultimate freeway design ROW needed to serve the build-out traffic needs of Circulation Element. This policy proposes a mechanism acquired in the future to address build-out ROW needs. Category on the Areas Plans, showing lands between the out ROW. The Overlay Category would allow the base acquired for ROW, which would provide the flexibility nee transportation corridors. As the County determines the bui transit ROW, these would be shown on the Area Plans. at the beginning of the RCIP, and strong preference was reiterated in a t of voters expressed an interest in Congestion Relief Standard. CETAP corridors or the build-out s freeway ROWS are not sized verside County. For example, the rtes the Caltrans ultimate freeway out will operate mostly at LOS F. d-up traffic and by waves of stop- congestion on the freeways, more ample, where the Hemet to Lake more ROW at build-out than the anon gap between the amount of ncept and the amount of freeway Riverside County General Plan identify land that may need to be mechanism would be an Overlay trans ROW and the needed build- l use to continue until the land is d for long-range planning of major rut freeway ROW needs, including By showing the build-out ROW needs on the Area Plans, which aze used for development approvals, the proposed policy would help Riverside Count}G to avoid Orange County's mistakes of having to widen freeways inbuilt-up areas. The information would allow Riverside County to exercise foresight, and would assist in eazly resolution of issues. It's faz easier to reduce the ROW size of a corridor in the future, because it's much easier for the County to vacate la County demonstrates both of those lessons: The CDM Fre land have been sold off for residential use, benefiting all County realized that it needed to widen the 5-Freeway an lure than to widen a corridor in the than it is to condemn land. Orange ay was vacated, and portions of the ties. On the other hand, as Orange ne 55-Freeway after all, the Cotmty i had to condemn large portions of commercial and residential land at a much higher cost than if the land had been set aside at the beginning. For freeway segments that are constrained from attaining the congestion-reliving ROW and where no alternative route is proposed to relive congestion,) using the current travel patterns and mode choice, the number of additional lanes that may be needed to relive congestion on a freeway should be noted for informational purposes (if only to illustrate the need to consider other engineering options). Since the Circulation Element traffic model addresses bt should provide the land needed to serve build-out traffic. General Plan. The Supervisors want the congesti~ unconstrained by financing considerations at this stage. This information may be needed for the EIIt/EIS being traffic, the Land Use Element would be consistent within the ing planning process to be for the General Plan. R,~uested Policy The General Plan will show the freeway ROW needed to serve build-out traffic, including transit ROW, as an Overlay Category on the Land Use Element Area Plans. The Overlay Category would identify lands between the Caltrans ROW and the needed build-out ROW. The Overlay Category would allow the base land use to continue until the gland is acquired for ROW. Reouested Policy Add a policy following C.2.29, stating that: "the County in its land development negotiations will protect the freeway ROW, including transit ROW, needed to serve build-out traffic, shown on the Area Plans." ~ Providiug Freeway Congestion Relief Comparative Facts Discussion A February 2001 RCTC study found that 74 percent of vot transportation projects to reduce congestion. The provision the public to help them make informed decisions regardin improvements would create public support for the extension The CETAP Advisory Committee ought to identify a prose values to the public regarding specific freeway conge identification and provision of estimates of the incremenu improved level-of-service on freeways is needed. By tying a public could then effectively decide the LOS standard tha Riverside County. The process of providing comparative fac public interest in securing additional sources of funding. Pei freeway congestion relief improvements could be issued. One option for providing compazative facts to the public characterize each potential LOS for freeways and then give increase needed to fund only the cost-effective improve the Public rs expressed an interest in funding of comparative facts and values to specific freeway congestion relief if Measure A. to provide comparative facts and :ion relief improvements. The costs to achieve each successive pecific cost to a specific result, the they would fund for freeways in to the public may help to generate aps, separate bonds earmarked for would be to provide photos that he corresponding percent sales tax vents to achieve the given LOS, 3 factoring in additional funding sources, existing planned example: PHOTO 0.25-cent sales tax increase LOS E PHOTO 0.50-cent sales tax increase LOS D PHOTO ]-cent sales tax increase LOS C Requested Polrcv The CETAP Advisory Committee ought to begin a course to the public by identifying a process for how the fs comparative facts are the approximate incremental costs b improvements to achieve each successive improved level-c and time factors. For action to provide comparative facts s could be made available. The >nd planned design concept freeway service on freeways. LOS Standard for Freeways Discussion The consultant team is proposing to set the freeway congestio meaningless. What the proposed LOS E standard means) in conditions will be at or near capacity. Small increases in traffic movement. The low standazd would: lower the quality of life, and make Riverside Cour place to live or work make it more difficult to move goods in or out businesses to more favorable locations outside the C increase the jobs/housing ratio make air quality worse by increasing the amount of s The cumulative effect of traffic impacts is almost invariably planned. Therefore, keeping the LOS E standard will likely characterized by the formation of backed-up traffic, and w extremely unstable. The Circulation Element traffic moi condition of Riverside County's freeways unless action suc} the Committee. A higher standazd would provide the nee cumulative traffic impacts. Requested Policy Keeping in mind that it is easier to reduce the size of a f later, where the build-out freeway ROW is shown on the ~ the facility improvemenu at the LOS decided by the public ~ standard so low as to render it practical terms is that freeway will cause breakdowns in traffic a more congested, less desirable of the County, which may drive aunty and make it more difficult to traffic. >ne level-of-service worse than was ead to LOS F conditions, which are wes of stop-and-go traffic that aze el shows that LOS F will be the as this proposed policy is taken by led cushion to mitigate for future, sway later than to widen a freeway a Plans, the ROW will be sized for discussed above, or at LOS C. Reouested Policy Change the added policy following C.2.29, to read that: negotiations will protect the build-out freeway ROW, incl Plans, needed for the facility improvements at the LOS de Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Discussion It would make sense for the County to make sure that it 1 money spent. Without acost-effectiveness analysis, mone; squandered. So, in order to spend scarce public funds County ought to make sure that acost-effectiveness improvement alternatives, within any major transportatio effectiveness at relieving congestion could be measured ' have to spend in their cats - or a reduction in tot, Transportation solutions need to serve the real travel patten County in it's land development transit ROW, shown on the Area by the public or at LOS C." is the most congestion relief for the hat could relive congestion could be T'ectively to reduce congestion, the analysis is conducted for capital corridor such as a freeway. Cost- ~ the reduction in how long people Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT). of people. Reouested Policy Add a Policy C.2.39, stating that: "a cost-effectiveness analysis for congestion relief, measured in the reduction of total Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT), will be conducted for proposed capital improvement alternatives within any major transportation corridor such as a freeway." Caltrans Discussion The design process would be far more efficient and timely role in the design of projects instead of merely rejecting 1 participating in the design process, Caltrans could build the design of a project. f Caltrans were to play apro-active ~ojects after submittal. By actively criteria that need to be met into the Reouested Polirv Add a policy following C.2.20, stating that: "the County will encourage the active participation of Caltrans in the design of highway capital improvement projects." Orange Couuty Corridor Discussion There is no Orange County constituency that needs impro~ Because there is a lack of incentive and political will for the Corridor, Riverside County will need to begin actic planning; for the Corridor congestion problem to be Transportation Corridor Franchise Agreement blocking County corridor needs to be eliminated. A policy is nef resolvi,tg this issue. Reouested Policy Add a policy following C.2.5, stating that: "the County and authorities to provide for improvements and altem< County." ent of the Orange County Conrdor. ige County to initiate any action on unilaterally, both in court attd in solved. The 91 Express Lanes ded improvements in the Orange I that would formalize the goal of partner with government agencies transportation corridors to Orange ITEM 5 APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Comment letter on the Domen Specific Plan No. 310. PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior RECOMMENDATION: Approve the comment letter for Planning Commission BACKGROUND: This item was continued at the September 11, 2001 meeting. It was continued to the S action. Analyst to the Riverside County of the City Council at their 25, 2001 meeting for Council The Domenigoni-Barton Specific Plan is a 1,734 acre master planned community located in the Winchester area of Riverside County west of MWD's Eastside Reservoir. The land use concept proposes to create a community of 4,600 residential unitslocated within three distinct areas centered around an 18 hole golf course. Staff has prepared jcomments on the project relative to land use planning practices and impacts to the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: None directly, however, unmitigated traf the City to expend monies to solve traffic related problems. ATTACHMENTS: Comment letter on the impacts by this project may cause Specific Plan R:\BROWNS\agency review\SP 310 CC Staffrpt 9-25-Ot.doc 1 Domenigoni-Barton Specific Plan Comment Letter City of Tem 43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - (909) 694-6400 - FAX (909) 694-6477 September 25, 2001 Aleta Laurence, AICP Director of Planning Riverside County Planning Department P.O. Box 1409 Riverside. CA 92502-1409 Subject: Specific Plan No. 310, GPA No. 451 and Deaz Ms. Laurence: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above cases. concerns regarding Specific Plan 310 and the associated EIR. We have reviewed the traffic impact analysis for the proje projected that the proposed development will add in excess of ; Road south of Benton Road, none of the major intersections or Temecula were included in the scope of study. It is anticipate will adversely impact several intersections on Winchester Roa The Traffic Impact Analysis for the project only consider conditions and the year 2020. There is no interim analysis for project to identify phased off-site improvements and funding at various stages of development. Moreover, the Traffic Impa off-site improvements; however, it does not appear that a fu proposed off-site improvements. The EIR for the project recommends that the County General to upgrade Winchester Road to a classification of "Tr recommendation is indicative of the project's impact on V{ considers the project's impacts to be significant regionally considerations for impacts to traffic and circulation. We woe approval until the traffic problems can be resolved. R:\6ROWNS\agency review\SP310-9-25-0I comment le¢ecdoc -California - 92589-9033 6359 Comment Letter This comment letter will address our ;t and conclude that although it is .,000 vehicles per day to Winchester Winchester Road within the City of d that the proposed project's traffic 1 in the vicinity of the I-15 Freeway. intersection LOS for the existing Bening year or various phases of the arces to mitigate the project impacts Analysis identifies numerous costly ling mechanism is in place for the an Circulation Element be amended >portation Corridor". Again this Chester Road. In addition the EIR l requires a statement of overriding .request that [his project not receive Aleta Laurence, AICP September 25, 2001 Page 2 The project maybe premature based on the unknowns of the ~ Recreation Area land uses and the Eastside Reservoir in gener year the City has concerns relative to this Specific Plan based t development. If you should have any questions regarding our comments 694-6400. Sincerely, Jeff Comerchero, Mayor cc: Shawn Nelson, City Manger City Council Planning Commission ~posedDiamond Va1leyLake West If there are 2-4 million visitors per the uncertain nature of the reservoir contact Stephen Brown at (909) R:\BROWNS\agency review\SP3I0-9-25-B1 comment letter.doc 2 ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: ~~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Acceptance of an Easement Deed Winchester Road with portions within located near the southwest corner of ' Engineer for a Meandering Sidewalk along Parcel 13 of Parcel Map No. 21383 Vinchester Road and Diaz Road PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of I Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engl RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a RESOLUTION NO.2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING FOR A MEANDERING WINCHESTER ROAD WITH PARCEL 13 OF PARCEL REQUIRED PER THE CONDI FOR PLANNING APPLICATION Works entitled: COUNCIL OF THE CITY ANEASEMENT DEED SIDEWALK ALONG PORTIONS WITHIN MAR NO. 21383 AS f1ONS OF APPROVAL NO.~ PA98-0409 BACKGROUND: On May 11, 2000 Planning Applical rental business, was approved administratively subject Approval. Per Condition 38 of the Conditions of Approve Winchester Road. Due to site constraints, the required wf constructed in an area that impeded the path of travel fo Therefore, the sidewalk alignment was modified to circun valves. The precise grading plan was revised to reflect th with the sidewalk realignment exhibit for an easement de meander through private property shall be dedicated t Department of Public Works, the City Attorney, and the City secure public access, construction and maintenance throw and location of the portion of the meandering sidewalk ea; part of the said Easement Deed, is in general conforman~ plan. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Easement Deed -Meandering Sidewalk with Exhibit "A" on No. PA98-0409, an equipment to the associated Conditions of I sidewalk is to be installed along ter service connection valves were the proposed sidewalk alignment. vent the water service connection :sidewalk realignment and agrees ;d. Easements for sidewalks that > the City and approved by the Council. The easement deed is to Ih private property. The alignment ement shown on Exhibit "B", made e with the revised precise grading "B" made parts thereof. R:~agdrpt\01\0925\parcel 13 of 7 RESOLUTION NO.2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN FOR A MEANDERING SI WINCHESTER ROAD WITH I PARCEL 13 OF PARCEL MA REQUIRED PER THE CONDITIO FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City Council of the determine and declare that: A. The construction location of water the need to meander the required the revised precise grading plans; B. City Staff has established the requiremt sidewalks that meander through private C. The applicant, Vincent R. Graves, I which grants an easement for construction and maintenance of the D. Acceptance of the easement deed interests of the community. WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of the easement deed by Vincent R. Graves, Principal for n Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. NCIL OF THE CITY EASEMENT DEED EWALK ALONG ~RTIONS WITHIN NO. 21383 AS IS OF APPROVAL PA98-0409 TEMECULA DOES HEREBY of Temecula does hereby find, connection valves necessitated around the valves as shown on for dedication of an easement for submitted an easement deed ring sidewalk including the both the public and private la hereby desires to accept ip sidewalk as described in NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts the easement deed by Vincent R ~ Graves, Principal for a meandering sidewalk. ~ PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 25`h day of Sep' the City Council of the City of rer 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:\agdrpt\07\0925\parcel 13 of ~ 2 (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula Resolution No. 2001-_ was duly and regularly ado~ted t Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 25t day vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: California, do hereby certify that y the City Council of the City of if September, 2001 by the following W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:\agdrpt\Ot\0925\parcel 13 of i 3 383. m eanderingsidewal keasementdedication -, EXEMPT RECORDPIG REQUESTED BY Ciry of Twxar PER CgVT CT3DE 6107 AND WNEN RECORDED MAR. TO Ciry ofTm,cvb-CRY Ckrk P 0 Bos 9073. a3100 Bminaa Park Dr. Temc~vlyG 42589-9033 MwIL rnx srwrsfExfs rn Ciry ofTe~e:Na P O Bm 9037. U1W Burmm Puk Dr. rmiecvh.U 91569-9037 EASEMENT DEED-MEANDERING SIDEWALK FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is See Attached Exhibit "A" For Complete Description L, tVTINESS 77TEREOF, these presorts have executed this instrument this 4^ day of la p2r~ .20~ STATE OF CALTFORMA) SS. ,o-cc ,before me the undersigned, a Notary Public N and for th/e Srtate of Califomia, personally appeared personally (mown to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose nemc(6) is/are subscribed to the within iashument and admow7edged to me that he/she/they executed the same in hisrherhheu authorized capacily(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the inswment the person(s), ar the anti a on behalf of which the persons WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature PrintpName an Title virrCf rlT Q~ 6y qJ Sr ~f iwU PAL ~k JO Ji? A. L ONS ~~. Commisslc^=1U1672 _ ":^s-_'a ~ Nota7 PUaC-CalifCmin ~ ~ RIV(vsl~C County r My Crmm.-sti:r~Prh]]. SfY The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as se[ forth above. TEMECULA By: ATTEST: BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney GRAh'f(S) [o [he CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for meandering sidewalk, including the coruvuction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the Ciry of Temecula, State of Califomia, described as: ~ ly) 213 b' 3 (, ~ is ~l 2 ~ i 3 COUNjY OF RIVERSIDEf On CL t; Y, ..icn. Mayor EXHIBIT "A" A 6.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR SIDEWALK PURPOSES OVER PARCELI3 PM 21383 AS SHOWN ON MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 167, PAGES 18 THROUGH 25 OF PARCEL MAPS, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. THE CENTERLINE OF SAID EASEMENT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT THE WESTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 13 OF S ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF WINCHESTER F ANGLES TO SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE NORTH 45°22'27" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 44°37'33" EAST, 9.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°37'33" EAST, 4.95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°22'27" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID RIGHT OF THENCE NORTH 0°22'27" EAST, 4.24 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°37'33" WEST, 10.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THENCE SOUTH 45°22'27" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY BEGINNING. D PARCEL MAP, SAID POINT BEING AD, DISTANT 50.00 FEET AT RIGHT 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF WAY, 41.54 FEET; RIGHT-OF-WAY; 48.04 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF EXHIBIT " so, R ~ ~~ ~/ I Y i i s• ,.~ ~ ,- ~ i ~ N45'22'27"E ~ i 10.00' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / ~] S89'37'33"E a0 a.ss' S44'37'33"E 9.80' ~ ~~l ~~ ~~~° °~l~ 14/s/01 I < <' ,:. , . SCALE:1 "=20' ~~'~dqq,~d~~pd ~~ ~d dd!ld ~ 1J °a ° NO. 3165s LIC. E;~? i 2/31G4~ 2313 E. Philadelphia St., Ste. F ONTARIO, CA 91761 VT (909) 930-1466 FAX (909) 930-1468 TION PLANNING • CIVIL • SURVEYING _. SHEET: JOB NO. SIDEWALK !0' 2 OF 2 3336 EASEMENT ITEM 7 __ ~~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: /William G. Hughes, Director of Public W DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Jeffrey Heights Road and a Maintained Street System within Parcel Map Calle Girasol and east of Riverton Lane Engineer AL ion of Calle Girasol into the City- 144931ocated on the north side of PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of P blic Works Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engireer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING JEFFREY HEIGHTS ROAD AND A PORTION..OF`.CALLE GIRASOL INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET~SYSTEM (WITHIN PARCEL• MAP fJO.14493) BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervi January 20, 1981. The owner dedicated to public use for designated as lettered lots on the map. Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public imps replacements were satisfactorily completed. No bonds are map. The public street now being accepted by this action is Girasol along the parcel map frontage. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural years. ATTACHMENT: 1. Resolution No. 2001 2. Vicinity Map with Exhibits "A-B", approved Parcel Map No. 14493 on 't and public utility purposes streets ants and all required repairs and by the City relating to this parcel Heights Road and a portion of Calle will be required every 5 to 8 r:\agdrpt\.2001 \0911 \pm 14493.accepisireets -:;.- RESOLUTION NO.2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING JEFFREY HEIGHTS ROAD AND A PORTION OF CALLE GIRASOL INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 14493) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, On January20, 1981, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors accepted an offer of dedication for street and public utility purposes made by Art and Olympia Brehm, owners on recorded Parcel Map No. 14493: and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed: and, WHEREAS, Jeffrey Heights Road and a portion of Calle Girasol along the parcel map boundary, although dedicated on the parcel map, were not accepted into the maintained street system: and WHEREAS, the City does not hold any bonds relating to the improvements for this parcel map: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City-Maintained-Street System that §treet and portion of street offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 25t" day of September, 2001. Jeff ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Mayor 2 r:~agd rpt\.2001 \0911 \pm 7 4493.acceptstreets STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2. vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: 3 da la, California, do hereby certify that ~ by the City Council of the City of tf September, 2001, by the following r:~agd rpt\.2001 \0911 \pm 14493.acceptstreets EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO.2001- Accepting public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Parcel Map No. 14493 into the City- Maintained Street System as described below: Those portions of Parcel Map No. 14493 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, as filed in Book 87, Page X60, Inclusive, of Maps, in the Recorder's Office of said county, pa i icularly described as follows: 1. Lot "A" (Portion of Calle Girasol, half-width, along the southern parcel map boundary) of said Parcel MapNo. 14493 2. Lot "B" (Jeffrey Heights Road, half-width,!along the western parcel map boundary and within Parcel 2) of said Parcel Map No. 14493 ~ 3. Lot "C" (Jeffrey Heights Road, half-width, along the western parcel map boundary and within Parcel 1) of said Parcel Map No. 14493 a r:\agd rpt\.2001 \0971 \pm 7 4493.acceptstreets 0 ~ ,, W L--~-~-. s X w z y I h ° R ~ ~ ~ '^ ~ o f ~`G ~~ W Q e~ v '+ e@v0 ~ h u ~ oQi~ n V¢ O~k >t Q a ~Z r o ~ v c V ac~A~ P ~ .o..~ i 2 V oa RE W va ~ h v~t?b ~ Q m 1. k ° J ti F> ~° q' o~ ~ W H i e ~ Q h k°° Q a rt 4 >e ., >° y2 R oa ~ °e ~> ° 41 ~ o jog. b = ° uy > u ~+ 4Wi IJ O~~~~ ~ Q ¢a ium bo ~u h ~o°\C~v~ yn.~ C 0 °~e~M° ~ Z oa°``{N t ¢~ ti vo ~_ZO ~ ,d ° E ~ F Q o a ~ o V mod 4°k °g ..e ~ E" ~~90 ~ .l 'ev Q ~07~ °„ Q ~i a o 0 2 Q 0 ~n W i; o -l o ~ d o O .N '¢i p m i, ~ p °C o t°i _ _ _ ~ ~.tix~ ~~~ W ~ g~g1~ ~~F~'i ~vg~~~~~ ~~ ~ o ~~: ~~a:~hc ~~ ~ ~ $ ~~ ~ htti~'~~p~"'~o2C2 t~0 `J~po;Q o ~m ~Z~S~. o$~F~~~~ ~2 ~~ ~ti~ ~ Q OV. ~ 2~~1~~ h'~U~QOa~~ 3~ -~~'lV ~ l ~, ~h Z • o ~~~~~N&~~ ~~ ~CV~1 ti y Q _.9~. ab / ss o h Y y: R ~ m ~L ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ / /, i 4Q j > a ~ I 1 `_°~ 9. ~ Z Q J ~ ~~~ '1 \~ Z i~t eo t G 23 2 ~~h ^~~ ~; ~~$ ti~ iY/db~~ d e~~~~o ` I \ N ~~~30 o ~ J " ~y ~'~e o3h a ~ 3 0 ' ' m ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ° -o ~eh 4EV ~~Ip ~~~ V c ~ ° ~ ° O a ` ~ V c ~° i Q, ~Y! p3 ,~@ m~ tio`~a a; l`I~ oW ~~~`~ Q°"° ° ti _~Y?~ A~ A3~~Z x ~V ~~ ~~W ~~c h ~~> ~~ ~Q~ ??~ ~ 0 ~n M N~ ~~~1 ~~i~ ~g~ ~h~~ G~ ~~V ~ ~ ~~p Wly~ QQ33 ~. 'IR V\ ~h 0 4 "''''CCCCCC l.~ti ~ a\.. ~ .W g . so Fem. ~ "~3yB -. rrr~. _'ti- `~ J~>k 1J/J15b e~~UNM HI N~~i~(y~ ~ Vt ~ os7Myy of na/~ %L-OJ // g S ~ osaaery~Y /LG~ L J 'O~w 15~i e e -- ,Loo/L Dol, /6a0Ar ,69 aJF ,BF ZLF ^ o® ~ N 009 ~`b ((`V~~ ~~~' 8;~:' :\\ 0~ °' c. ~hh 6,\~ hVv ° ~\ `,v ~ ~ V I\ ~ i. I. ~ Z ao ~ 's 9~'~ , ~Y\~ o '•. ~, U "' ~ ~~~ ~ NV1 a W Q Q o0 l~ 'NOl2V r~ ~~ a ~ ~~ Q e,~h ~ ?,a ~ ~ ~ y ~ET~ J a W Z ~ yY~~~ `$WF 24 ~ayo s ~z W~"~ ~,a~°v . ~~ ~j/ ~~ V ~~ /~°O• T o ® ,U C N ie0 z ~,~~ ~h , oo/ -, / : ~7aJC z W o c k y 6~ E a ° xa S i i y O ~ 1 ~ ~. ° 3 o F $$ £ ~ $.Q~ V c u R o o k ` " $ v h ~ & ° ~ ~ u a i e ~ ~ ° o 1.. 0 Lh ° pn ; ui t°', VV ~ ` ° V ° 4 V V - ~ 2 353.', 0 3 °^ o¢ o b o ~' ~ ,~ y W ~ i ~ ~. e " ~ 1 Ql Q ~ •~ ~W {yt ~h ~~rt 8eh h U~~^ ~~~^ m2"° ~ pW U?`)j~ ~R~~ ~~2W ~~~~ Nei Jee ~hn Pm ~ `~ 8~.~,y 8^^' ~~I V V X11 .~VV~ ~ ~ I .. =L ,co F! "~ ~, ~ p~VO S S F M1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~r ~IWO4M ~,~~~; •*9 ~~ ~ ~t~;~t>5.9 ~ ~q ~ 2 `o 2 • V ,~1 ~ J ~~ ~q ~~~ ~W~pp~ ' ~~Wn ~~1 ~~ '. ~~yh>,•. N \ ~~~~~ ~po~P ~A~~h i ~~~ ~~~~~ .~ yg~ V 1. 'n -\T ~~i -'QJ' S1N9/3N rt3Y!!3 `~ ~ '*i ~~~ ~~ec~s'ov ® - ah ~ m ,V® ''Y9J G J V ~ I$ r ¢ N v~ ~b ~Q i d ~a =~~~o ~~g ~Qn~i~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ b ~~ ~ \ ~ ~ ,'_`e. yr ya \ :~h ~~~~ ,aka ,~~I,Q f =~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~2~`g~~n ~?~2 k . . ~ I ~ ~ 1 o~~Djo'r, ~~ ti .. ° o I, I ~k'o' a ~" W 4~ E ~ a, ~ .,U o.. ado. _.cuo YB°@\~~ {{II ° ° 3 ° ~ e o I `~ ~ -4 a $ o C ~ ~' o , i$ E o .g M °u ~ U O °o _~ l ~` ° ~ O ° X20 ~ ~o-~ F ° '^> Z hc> Uir, ~ I G ~~\ 2E Z h~. OO ~~'%, iii Iooi°cuo 2f N ~~ a~ 1 ~~ z V a tt ~i f/ETA--- P,W65 v V/C/N/ T Y ~1 PN! / 44 93 ~~ r .y ~~ P Rp. S/T6 ITEM 8 ~~ _ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUL/ AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: ^~t~Nilliam G. Hughes, Director of DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 29406, Located on the Knuckle Works/City Engineer Side of Enterprise Circle West at PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of f Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer - RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council apF conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivisio the Faithful Pertormance and Labor and Materials Bond as s Monument Agreement and accept the Nbnument Bond as BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 29406 is a tw south side of Enterprise Circle West at the knuckle. The sidewalk are in place. The Developer is conditioned to co On February 16, 2000, the Planning Commission for the 1 Parcel Map 29406, with the appropriate Conditions of Apprc with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mai FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Parcel Map No. 29406 Works Development 1) Parcel Map No. 29406 in ovement Agreement and accept forthe agreement 3) Subdivision tyfor the agreement. parcel subdivision located on the ite improvements other than the :t the sidev~alk. of Temecula approved Tentative This final map is in conformance division map, which substantially ory ministerial act under State law. r:\agdrpt\2001 \0925\pm29406.map CITY OF TEME DEVELOPMENT FEE CASE NO. PM Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their FEE Flood Control (ADP) Development Impact Fee z to this project. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Paid Paid r:\agdrpt\200'I \0925\pm29406. map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERI FEES AND SECURITIES PARCEL MAP NO. 29406 DEPARTMENT DATE SeotemhPr 25. 2007 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 4,000 $ 2,000 Water $ 0 $ 0 Sewer $ 0 $ 0 TOTAL $ 4,000 $ 2,000 Monument $ 675 - DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due 3 $ 0.00 $ Paid $ Paid $ 103.00 $ 8.00 $ 790.00 $ 50.00 $ 951.00 $ 0.00 r:\agdrpl1200110925\pm29406. map ~a; ,~e~ r ~G ~~ ~yo'J aec ~` C% F~f~ %',o~. ~~s~ s~ Site v~ N„ SO ~~ . e~~~~a O~ ~C'o~ ~~ c~~~^ O,.°co ~~o VICINITY MAP Not to /~o ti~ tie ~,o N W w w N O ~- ~~¢ 8p.~', W ~ t g ~ ~ W h W ~ ¢ ~- ~ is 3 w of ° `dP G n 7 Z m N w E ~n ~ 3~ n ~~~ d 8 ~ ~ 3 g c 3 E o U p a ~ '~ c ~6 g ~' ~ ~ ~~'„ c o ~~~~ p W~>p ~ °~p< x ~$-~ e z O J U z O O C ~ o~W gW z ~ ~ 'po o '"Y~3g 41 N ~o N up$wm y `^, g~~ 2 agaWg ~ ~ ~~, i_ \ ~u~ ~ ~i~~ t z ~ m~~ °~G7~ az 1 O ~ n~~ pU~~~ '~ ~~wWH ti go~ u, Quipo`~ j ego ~ $gzrW~ U ~ ~_Y ~<°zs$~ a m ~ '~N~, of 1 „ or= <powW~ Wr 1 oaf o '- ~~;"n~~ V ~ ~~,~ w Leo ~ ~~ENa~ §~_ °=~8~ mo~W o Q ~ ~ ~70,0~ a ~~m U i 2 ion ~~y ~ ~~ g€ W ,y F- h w n ~ p O ,Q m°o " ~ rc~~ 3 ~~ W o Ys _€~ S 0 Y g ~a 3U ~a u I Hih~ ~ Yo ~ u - °~~~~ a = u~ ]~>LFW ~& §~ h'i$$3~~wi ` ` ~ ~ - z ~ ~ ~- 2 ca § ~o~2 N o ~ ~ ~Y ~}o gS ~ E `~$z}ez ~? y w N iE ~°~~= k `~ 7 ~ c~ N zp°-. a:w ~ V 4 i ^"` o N~ ~E w52w~'oW$ , ~ c o ^ od ~e C "x m33 u3Nw7 0 ~ w i i g ~foe =W WS T u~`w ~ Z i SPaY==" ' Yz Y_` 'z o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~€o~`~°e ; ~ Q~~oo3W ~' ' btp Y z ~' _~Te~ca~ a 4 b ~ ~ z, z~ ~ ~ ¢~C yap p C 6 I ypyp z £}} h n ~p~W ~^ ~ ~ 2 o w Z < 1- w 6 id - ~' m o ~ ~fi cn~3'6~ i h 2~$ oci~iion F tun k §^ogz ~~NWt~ o 4`'8'a p ~Qe~§ w So,~w ~~C~~o ogu t Ngog O 8~y~m° ~` z=W;~e~ of u m ohs :4o ~$o~~w°~ ~ pG~m C~0 p ~~~oaF~o w °zWW3"`~$ mW° 2 > >aa € ow% s_3> ga mmw~t£~o ~~~ Q~W~oWWW ~ ao _m 'sum S wa m za ye_yw U~ h ~~ a~ ~~ w `~ Q w 3~ y oa V) ~ Yu Wo U ~u L~55 U c~3 r~~yWy=3 ~~53'. ~ha 3 R n h W h W U h N O N ~ a ~~ _ ~~ ~ ~~~~ g~~ ~ $~ ~~y~ ~n • o co ~~ N° Q ~~ a U§ n~ {J'_.ai31 ice' ~ y: ~ i~ 9'" tY~ ;'z°~'w ' y'~ 1 ~~~,~+ B R ~$ J y e ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ e~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ n ~~ o ~~~ ~~~ :~ X ~ ~ ~~^ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ a a ~W~ ~~a ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~g~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~E ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ° ~ ~ «' 3z / G ~ / // / y /~ ~_~~ ~,~ ~~- ~ \~~ 3 ~~' ~,,;, Y \'~ ~ ~ \'4~l$ ~~ d9'•~O' /mod Ir ~ ~ ~ Z ~ y "b~'s`~`'' S ~~ ~ J x /~-- -~ r ~; ~R~? `, ;=; a, 1; L III a. n _R~o~~ "~~R° dz+a V ~ 2 ~\ 4, ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~. ' ~ ~ `I ~sw' ~i, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~E ' ~ '~~ yy °C ~a€ ' eg t~ ~~~ Ba~ ' . r ;s. I +°'' ~ s; s M as{ m SI N Y ^ ~I~ ~ _~ s ~, Vf E ~Z a a=~ ~w r ~ ~ b w lD d=t0yd~i, ~ 8=5 ~ ojS,~~Y~ ~ ~ ~ „~ p ~C1 a ~. ~~'01 • I~ °~ a R ~j tM1 a f~ g b$ 5 f ~P. ~ e a ~+ $ a ~~ W s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ° ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ g ~ ~~ 4h ~ F ~ }~~ye ~~~~ ~ aRR~ ~~ C ~ 6 ~ n~ iF ~ . s ~ ~ ~ a a ~ ~y~ ~a a~~r¢ ~ ryya I, ~e~ ff@ ~,Ye~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ a I ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ 8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9~~ ~ ~~h~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ t GE ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ Z ~ O ~ Fg`~ / i ~~ Q ~ ct' ~ ~ / N ~~~ y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~4 ,, ~. ~~ ~~ ~ 4 .~ ~b ,, a ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ W w~~ Y~ Y~ ~ e i ~ .~e~' l ~„d ~,.~' a ~' ~ t.-- .~ _i ' ` I ~{~,~ ~~~ \ I \ ` - ~/ ~ ~F r~ ~ i x!!93 _ ~~ Q65 ip, ~1 ~y ~~ `J ~~ R ~ s ai ~ ~~~SE ~~ 2 'gq~xp ~ ~ ~'~ ~ o `' ~: ~- 2 A \ ~ \ s ~~ G ~ ~.~ ~ ~ a ,_- ~~,s. - , \', "' ~$ Y .~ ~' !- }~ !e ~'~ ~ . 8P''~ 3~ i h C N x s `y ~ u U y 1 ~ y ~4=' ~ i~I i i w = t~~sl ~~- p~`h R tiii+ < ~ szo \ \ ~ j y o ~~d»~ ~ ~ SR `S~ '' mm~ix ti. ~ b^- fj,' ~ ~ 8d5 31 _i'- ' ~ ~ `4 ~~ D 9 ~„-~ yy r !$~1v ,~ :~ ~ ~yP~ G b~$ ~ ~I /N~ V ti) 0 °m w U W ITEM 9 a ~ ~ _ .. v APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECUL~ AGENDA REPORT TO: 1 City Manager/City Council FROM: ry~-y~lNilliam G. Hughes, Director of DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Request to Increase Contingency for Rancho California Road Bridge Wide Project Number PW99-18 ~~ PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer-CIP Steve Charette, Assistant Engineer -,CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Authorize the City Manager to approve contract additional amount of $35,000 above the previ Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Proje BACKGROUND: On August 22, 2000, the City the Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project to T.' amount of $330,366.00. During design, the preliminary gt there is a potential for soil liquefaction and lateral spreadi proposed widening (movement and subsequent failure of th conditions). Further investigations are necessary to deter design measures to mitigate its effects and protect the exis CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOROF FIB CITY MANAGER Works/City Engineer ~ssional Services Agreement Over Murrieta Creek - des with T.Y. Lin International for an approved 10% contingency for the luncil awarded the design contract for Lin International of San Diego in the echnical investigation indicated that around the existing bridge and the Bridge due to seismic and/ or flooding ine the extent of this potential, and B bridge and the proposed widening. Staff is requesting that the City Council authorize an increase to the contingency amount for T.Y. Lin's design services agreement in the amount of $35,000. This amount will cover design modifications anticipated to mitigate any impacts to the structure pending the additional investigation. The original design agreement did not provide for this additional investigation and design modifications. FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho Califomia Road Bridge funded through Development Impact Fees (Street Impro\ Adequate funds are available in the project's Account ~ additional design costs in the amount of$35,000.00. ATTACHMENT: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description Bening Over Murrieta Creek Project is gents) and Capital Project Reserves. 210-165-710-5802 for the potential R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2001\0925\PW99-18.DOG _~p~ A`/~ .1FS~-/ h a d r F w d O L Q z - F- ~i O a a 0 U W D U F u L 4 C m o ~= o m ~_ U 5 3 ~ ~ L v F s s E„ o L `" O d m F y C L-. O ~ ~ y e0 pj N ,D 9 y ~> s a~ O .... Y OD N .C ~. U~ :=~3U °' .. ~o tu.~ 3 `v ~ ~ O ~ O .~ ed C ~ ~ 'O ~ > y O d ~ ~ .~ G_ ~ ~ 7 W ~ N U 'O t O O •• U T m O ~ 7 9 ~ N E ~ ~ ~ V ~3~R .~ .~C v ~"' ~.. ~" ~ w 3 ~' 0 ~ ~ ~ a3~ V L C O .~ 7 U U W v ~3 N U u u •L a a L C u 0] F o F= '^ E 0 c UU of e 0 N of O 0 N OI f~1 O N OI i N O O N NI O ...i O O N .~. 7 ~ ¢F ~ooo ~°o°o°o r"ovio 7~ ~ f~l 00 - r, c 9 MI 691 O O O O p p O M r O ~ ~ N V ~ O 69 N 7 O 4 ~ O O y T ~ ~ ~ Hl ~ ~ m L ~ w ` y y U T ^~ ~ a ~ O ~ ~ O 7 G ~ .v -' C~ O C p ¢ a~ y ~ ~ ¢ ~ ` d. U M 0 0 y N d a ~ > N U~ ~A n 69 H O U ~ °o ~ ~ ~ y c O °'~ L y E v O ` o C_ p B . C y ~, ~, L ~ U L t Vl fi o W A U F '.z . rn G V .~ N 7 H m G C w U 2 0 U N a 0 C C U U N O d O~ ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council !}~,~,William G. Hughes Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 25, 2001 Purchase of City Equipment RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the purchase of the vibratory rollerand equipment trailer from Ingersoll-Rand Equipment Sales for $26,916.93. BACKGROUND: The adoption of the 2001/02 annual Operating Budget approved the funding for the purchase of a vibratory roller and trailer. This roller and trailerwill be used bythe City maintenance personnel. The primary use of this equipmentwill be to compact asphalt and other like surfaces by the City's maintenance staff. On August 16, 2001, Request For Proposals (RFP) were mailed to seven (7) equipment vendors (see attached vendor list). On August 30, 2001, four (4) vender responses were received, of which one response was for a decline to bid. The purchase of this vibratory roller and trailerwill satisfythe equipment specification and is available for immediate delivery. Based on staffs research the below bids are considered competitive. The following are the bid results: Dealer Ingersoll-Rand Equipment Rental Service Corp Goldstar Asphalt Products Haaker Equipment Equipment /Model DD-14/16 Dura-Pac Vibratory Roller &Tra Wacker Hydrostatic Vibratory Roller &Tra BW 90 AD-2 Roller & FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the the total equipment purchase amount. Attachment: Vendor List Price $26,916.93 $29,229.25 $33,277.51 decline to bid Year2001-02 Operating Budgetfor r:\agendareport\2001 \0925\VibratoryRol ler D & H Truck Equipment Breezer Equipment Supply 4567 Federal Blvd. 1566 Sterling Court San Diego, CA 92102 Escondido, CA 92029 Gold Star Asphalt Products Ingersoll-Rand Equipment 1354 Jet Way 12747 Schabarum Avenue Perris, CA 92572 Los Angeles, CA 91706 Haaker Equipment Company RSC (Rental Service Corp) 3505 Pomona Blvd. 28377 Felix Valdez Pomona, CA 91768 Temecula, CA 92592 Pacific Utility 1326 E. Francis Street Ontario, CA 91761 2 r:\agendareport12001 \09251VibratoryROller ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAL CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: ry~/~iNilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Completion and Acceptance of the Pala Road Bridge Soundwall Project Project Number PW97-15SW PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Accept the "Pala Road Bridge Soundwall Project, complete; and 2. File a Notice of Completion, release the Per Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the 3. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On October 24, 2000, the City Council Bridge Soundwall Project, Project Number PW97-15SW, to and authorized the City Manager to approve change orders of $32,000, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Orders 1, 2 & 3 which provided the installation of a concrete along the new soundwall. As a result of all change orders th Number PW97-15SW" project as Bond, and accept aone-year and of the Notice of Completion, ~rded the contractforthe Pala Road Bullard for the amount of $320,000 to exceed the contingency amount e City Manager approved Change tch and additional landscape areas \al contractamountis$351,183.54. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. ~ FISCAL IMPACT: The Pala Road Bridge Capital Impro~ funded with Bureau of Indian Affairs Funds, Capital Project The final Contract amount, including all change orders and ; funds from the BIA grant, Capital Project Reserves and De\ cover the entire cost of this contract. The City has already i from the BIA. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit Project, including this portion, is es and Developer Impact Fees. ents, is $351,183.54. Adequate ant Impact Fees are available to the process for reimbursement REPORTS12001 \092SPW97-15S WAccept.DOC RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property~hereinafter described. 92590. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Califomia 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to R.J. Noble Company to perform the following work of improvement: PALA ROAD BRIDGE SOUNDVIIALL Project No. PW97-15SW 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on September 25, 2001 . That upon said contract the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required bylaw. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follow: PROJECT NO. PW 97-15SW. 6. The project location is: Pala Road, City of Dated at Temecula, California, this 25"' day of September 2001. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Susan W. Jones CMG, City Clerk I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded iri the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council Dated at Temecula, California, this 25`h day of September 2001. Susan RACiP~Projadsbw9TPwA~-15ko~rylel Sountlwdll i~ a CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND tvo. KF1856 PROJECT NO. PiiNa7-ltfSW PALA ROAD SOUNDWALL KNOW ALL PER80NS BY THESE PRESENT THAT: R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc. 980 Park Center Dr., Suite J, Vistas CA NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR S 92083 a corporation , herelnaf-er called Prindpal, and (eu In wneMSr ~ GarpwMkn. Putn~fYA a United States Fidelity and Guarant~ Company 333 The City Boa3evard.West, Suite 1100-Orange, CA 92868 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SUR~ hereinafter called SURETY, are held end firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum Of Thirty Five Thousand One HundrecL Sixteen - - - - - - - - - - - DOLLARS and I i8/~o0 - - - - - CENTS (t 35,116.18 - - ~ in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not bss thsn ten (10%j of the Contrail value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and ^ severally, firmly by these presents. ^ THE CONDITION OF THiS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Prindpaf entered into a certain Contrail with the OWNER, dated the 24th day of [k~r~har 2000, s copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PVi/si7- 153W, PALA ROAD t30UNDWALL. WHEREAS, said Contrail provides that the Principal will famish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one (1) year after approval of the flnal estimate on said job, by the OWNER, agalrtst all defers in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contrail has been completed, and was the final estlmate approved on ~, C~-S-~~~ .2004. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within Otte year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said jab pursuant to the Corrtrail, the work done under the terms of sakt Contrail shall disclose poor workmanship In the execution of saki work, and the carrying out of the terms of caid Contrail, or it shall appear that defective materials were famished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and In addition to the face amount speclfled, casts end reasonable expanses and fees shalt lx' included, induding reasonable attorneys fees incurred by the Clty of Temecula In auacessfuliy enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as poets end included in any judgment rendered. ~~ ~~ r,~~•»c,wwrair~na~ ~- CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 State of California County of Orange On 9~/:!• ~D / before me, Alexis H. DATE NAI personally appeared Nanette Mariella-Myers ® personally known to me - OR - ^ proved to me on the basis whose name(s) is/. acknowledged to r his/her/their author signature(s) on the behalf of which the ~~~ Though-the data-below is not required by law, it may prove could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this_form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ^ INDIVIDUAL ^ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ^ PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL __ _ - --- ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ^ TRUSTEE(S) ^ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ^ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) 5-4087/GEEF 2/99 Public E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY ` satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) e subscribed to the within instrument and e that he/she/they executed the same in ed capacity(ies), and that by hislher/their istrument the person(s), or the entity upon person(s) acted, executed the instrument. ALEXIS H. BRYAN WITNESS my hand and official seal. ~ Commission#1306738 /~ z =d Notary Public - Catifcrnia ~ y~.~ a ( Jj Orange County My Comm. Expires Jun 1, 2005 _ ~ SIGNATURE OF N~ to persons relying on the document and OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ®1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8238 RemmM Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Perk, CA 913D9-7184 OPTIONAL Th@~PdU~ POWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company oiled S[a[es Fidelity and Guaranty Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company SL Paul Guardian Insurance Company i delity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 22665 I g G 6 g l 9 Power of Attorney No. Oertitica[e No. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Stale of New York, and [hat St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St Paul Guardian Insurance Company and SL Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of [he Slate of Maryland, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws o~ [he Since of Iowa, and [hat Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein ~ //ecrively called the "Companies'/, and that [he Companies do hereby make, constitute and appoint James A. Schaller, Rhonda C. Abel, Jane Kepner, Nanette Mariella-Mye s, Mike Pari2ino, Lin[la Enright, Jeri Apodaca and Patricia H. Brebner Costa Mesa Califotvia of the City of ,State ,their tine and lawful Attomey(s}in-Fact, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, [o sign its name as surety [o, and toy execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other writter, instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guarameeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings reguae8 orpei7nitted i~,any actions or proceedings allowed by law. [N WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this v ~i Seaboard Surety Company ,- .~ -. - __.... - - -- - __ - - ~ {4 SL Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ~' ~ -~ ~ti S[. Paul Guardian Insurance~Companv ~' f.^ ~o- ' ...t ~~~~ss~~tt SL Paul Mercury Insurance Company +~. Q `~ E{ Q`{",'y}4, "' ,~`YYry M'-~ e0Y_FSL 's ~Y~~T °~aF„i+bP} ~~ t92 ~\ 3fiALi:° t ng R , s ,.x nN ~4' State of Maryland City of Baltimore day of July 2001 States Fidelity and Guaranty Company +and Guaranty Insurance Company r and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. ~~~~~, ~.~ THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistam Secretary 31st Jul 2001 I On [his day of 3r ,before me, thle undersigned officer, personally appeared Jahn E Phinney and Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretory, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, SL Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, S[. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the steals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of said Companies; and that [hey, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing ins[mme It for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers. In Witness Whereof, 1 hereunto set my hand and official seal. My Commission expires the 13th day of July, 2002. 0 ¢" NOrAAF m t'U~C 1DgEC V sQ REBECCA EASLEY-ONOKALA, Notary Public 86203 Rev. 7-2000 Printed in U.S.A. F~ 1 I~ I~ CITYOF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND PROJECT NO. PAlA ROAD This is to certify that `~. \. K.a~,k.(nerem~ to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/s a/it has paid it services, tools, equipment, and all other bills wntracted for the CONTRACTOR'S agents, employees or subcontractr execution of it's conVact with the City of Temecula, wit construction, or repair of that certain work of improvemer 15SW, PALA ROAD SOUNDWALL, situated in the City of particularly described as follows: RELEASE fter the "CONTRACTOR") declares full for all materials, supplies, labor, >y the CONTRACTOR or by any of 's used or in contribution to the i regard to the building, erection, known as PROJECT NO. PW97- femecula, State of California, more PALA ROAD SOUNDWALL The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party i claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Further, in cdnnection -with the final payment of the disputes the following amounts: Description Rcoo.orS~ ~_ra,~#-• Sur~w, row -gyp \ dl c.~~ ~l-~'b ( the CONTRACTOR hereby Amounorto Dispute ~~.,.- ., Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. Dated: °I- 12 - ~ ( BY~ Print Name RELEASE R-1 F.'DeV~W WLITVFOJECTSPY9TYN9)-ISISouM WT9)iS5W5GEC5 Ool .. .~ ,S $. ITEM 1 APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager`s DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Request to Designate Certain Rollerblading or Similar Activity Area." as No Skateboarding, PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT 28820 AND 28835 SINGLE OAK DRIVE AS A "NO SKATEBOARDING, ROLLERBLADING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY AREA" PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 10.36 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE. BACKGROUND: The City has received a request to declare two properties located at 28820 and 28835 Single Oak Drive as a No Skateboarding, Rollerblading or Similar Activity Area as permitted by Ordinance 94-18. This ordinance was adopted to prohibit skateboarding and related activities in certain areas of the City when designated by the City Council. Larry Johnston Facilities Manager for Chemicon International who represents the owners, has made this request to have the property designated no skateboarding after experiencing incidental vandalism, noise and safety problems caused by skateboarders participating in their sport on the property managed by the applicant. Ordinance No. 94-18 requires that the owner or his application supporting the " No Skateboarding" designati action by the City Council is attached to this Agenda Repi which illustrates the area to be designated as a " No Ska violators after the resolution is adopted the area is posted FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 01- Application from Chemicon uthorized agent submit a written A letter of application requesting A vicinity map has been prepared Boarding". The police may cite any a "No Skateboarding" area. and Vicinity Map R:\SKATEBRD.NO\CC Saffrpt Chemicon 9-25-01.doc 1 ATTACHMENT N0. RESOLUTION NO. 01 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROP 28835 SINGLE OAK DRIVE AS A "NO ROLLERBLADING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY AI CHAPTER 10.36 OF THE TEMECULA MUNI WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 94-18 established C Code and adopted by ordinance permits the City Council to similar activity in certain designated areas; and, WHEREAS, the efforts of the property owner at 28 control skateboarding, rollerblading and similar activities hay WHEREAS, private property at 28820 and 28835 S receive damage in connection with skateboarding, rollerblad WHEREAS, the property owner of 28820 and 28835 City to designate the property as a "No Skateboarding, Roller WHEREAS, the property owner has submitted a wri Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, notice of proposed action was posted California Branch, the U.S. Post Office, and the Temecula V; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF T RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City findings: A. The City Council in approving this Resolution makes 1. Ordinance 94-18 was enacted by the City general public, as well as the right to enjoyment of private 2. The action proposed is consistent with Code. 3. The action proposed complies with all other local ordinances. . OF THE CITY OF ERTY AT 28820 AND SKATEBOARDING, iEA" PURSUANT TO CIPAL CODE. 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal t skateboarding, rollerblading or ?0 and 28835 Single Oak Drive to been unsuccessful to date; and, le Oak Drive has the potential to and similar activities; and, Oak Drive has requested the or Similar Activity Area"; and, application in conformance with City Hall, County Library, Rancho 'y Chamber of Commerce. CITY OF TEMECULA, DOES hereby makes the following following findings to wit: to maintain the safety of the within the City. 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal requirements of state law and RaSKATEBRD.NO\Chemican Reso.doc Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the Rollerblading, or Similar Activity Area" on the properties loc< Drive in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10.3E Enforcement of the "no skateboarding, rollerblading, or simi appropriate signage has been posted as required by Chap1 Code. Section 3. The City Clerk shall Certify the Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND Temecula this 25th day of September, 2001. establishment of a "No Skateboarding, ted at 28820 and 28835 Single Oak of the Temecula Municipal Code. ~r activity" shall not commence until 'r 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal of this Resolution. by the City Council of the City of Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, 2001-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Counci meeting thereof held on day of 2001, by the io hereby certify that Resolution No. of the City of Temecula at a regular following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: R:\SKATEBRD.NO\Chersticon Reso.doc Clerk 2 ~: .. ATTACHMENT NO. APPLICATION FROM CHEMICON INTERNATIONAL AND VICINITY MAP ./~ CHEMICON INTERNATIONAL September 5, 2001 Ms. Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RE: Properties at 28820 and 28835 Single Oak Drive, Deaz Ms. Ubnoske: Our company has been the victim of repeated property dama rollerbladers. This letter is to inform you of our intention to driveways that allow public access to the properties noted at These signs will stat that this is private property and no skate activities aze permitted. They reference Ordinance 10.36.02 Ordinance 10.36.070 outlining the punishment. The sign me high as outlined in Ordinance 10.36.050. Pursuant to City Ordinance 10.36.030 (d), please post the this issue is brought before the September 25ei meeting of Best regazds, L Johnston Facilities Manager cc: Mr. Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Mr. Roy Millender, Attorney ~~~f~ SEP - 7 2001 CA 92590 e caused by skateboazders and ost signs at each of the five (5) ve, per Ordinance 10.36.050. ~oazding, rollerblading or similaz prohibiting these activities and sores 17" X 22" with lettering 1" scary public notice and see that City Council. CHEMICON INTERNATIONAL 28620 Single Oak Drive,.Temecula, CA Phone (800) 437-7500 or (909) 676-8080 Fax (909) 676-9209 www.che Vicinity I Off` i :-. c I 3 I R:r I 572.71 i 361 o a ~,3~t/. ' = V FPS FA:St/42 m I 11 '~ PQ. \ ~ Q ` a Z O ~~ ~ ! ~' oA ~4 ^' y P' o t . m ~~, ~ Q ~ y' Y/. 372.' 6 ~ ` ~ ~,` J 00 l7 f Se 3. 62 ~ ~ 26¢.9 d~ 260 7 _ __ Q e k`°' ~ ~m '`~ y Js ImaP~ 22820 Single Oak Drive _ ~`6~ i ~~O \/ ~ y'c I F• I°' ~ i ~ o ry• ~ ,. e 9 oriSU C2 a9ry:l `~ 266. I6 663.54 1261.23 ~iq ap ~Iti \ 'OO a 5a, m~ Im QT .g c ry` e ~G P I ~ e. ~2 b°~ 341.16 d ~,P A' .~-- 387.6 PF ~ 3y Q ~~ ~ I25/1 e Q S !g 2 a~~9 . P `c ., ~_ ry~4 / ry 2pr `2 ry. 1`. 9 Z `ryy .4 A' ~ ' ~'~ /6 ~. k 90 ~ SSs. t3 p`-'6i/SB 5<'e.°.1 5~ _\ Ay' PQ- F~ '1 0 1 9 Q >, ,2 Qp • ~h, I e pF m Q y 6~4 •~ 2<9. ~B ~ q, PLO •" ~ ~ ~ 561. B6 Q a va '/ 212 2a,1~ a --- - ~/ 11.51 i9. e3 ~ K D ~ s5a .. / ! /67'.'5 S ~ P ?~~ 28835 Single Oak Drive 6~ .~ ,~,,Jy;N: / I 5 „P~ ~\ by Ory b M ITEM 1 APPROVAL ATTORNEY :TOR OF FINANC MANAGER .~ CITY OF TEMECUL~ AGENDA REPORT TO: City ManagerlCity Council FROM: Howard Windsor, Fire Chief DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Interim Fire Station Work P Works Project (01-21) RECOMMENDATION.: That the City Council: Approve the location of the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station; and 2. Approve an appropriation of $562,000 from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance for Fire Department staffing costs for thg interim station. BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2001, the Cityof Teme to residents of Vail Ranch. One of the challenges the C General Plan objective fora 5 minute Fire/Emergency Mec Vail Ranch. Although this goal is met Citywide, a review of 1 actual response time trials into Vail Ranch revealed that the the 5 minute General Plan goal. A permanent fire station to serve area residents in Vail Creek Specific Plan. From the proposed Wolf Creek Fire be met. However, the timeline for the completion of the la began providing municipal services faced was to ensure that the City's it Services response time was met in previous year's responses along with tual response times were not meeting has been conditioned in the Wolf ,the five-minute response goal will lent facility is currently unknown. At the September 11, 2001, City Council meeting, Councilmgmber Stone made a motion that the City pursue development of an interim fire station in the Vail Ranch area. The motion also allocated $250,000 to fund the associated capital costs related to the station. In addition, staff was directed to bring back a detailed work plan outlining all aspects of the project. The following represents that detailed work plan addressing each element of the project. It is staff's intent to have this facility fully operational by November 1, 2001, however, if there are issues that arise that are out of staff's control, we will notify the City Council immediately so that an amended time schedule can be provided. Location of Project The location of the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station is on thei north side of Overland Trail east of Redhawk Parkway. This piece of property is currently vacant and the City is in the process of obtaining a Grant Deed on the property from the developer of Yail Ranch. This property came under City control when the Vail Ranch annexation became officials as of July 1, 2001. In addition, Fire Department staff reviewed several locations before determining that this site provided for the best Po\CITYMGR\YATRSG\In¢rimf rcwurAplan. doc level of service to the Vail Ranch community. The Fire D this location and it was determined that the five-minute re Ranch. A location map is included as an attachment as Site Improvements ment also conducted time trials from use goal will be met in all areas of Vail as a detailed site map. This site has many benefits including: existing utility infrastru ture is readily accessible, and the site is flat and requires little finished grading. In order to construc~an interim station at this location, staff needs to provide for utility connections, paving and concrete work, landscaping, signage and fencing. Included, as an attachment, is an itemized cost estimate for the required work. Building Improvements Included on this agenda is a request to purchase a residentis of the station personnel. This residential unit is being purch necessary appliances included in the purchase price. In add another modular to be utilized as a business office. Finally between the two modular units. This awning will provide cc station. Staff will also ensure that this facility is ADA compli Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment modular unit to meet the living needs sed as a turnkey modular with all the ion, staff is negotiating for the lease of an awning needs to be constructed er to the fire engine assigned to this The majority of these items are related to living requirement of the station personnel. These will include beds, dressers, furniture and television. Additional requirements will include office furniture, computers, telephones, radios and other essential items. Operations and Maintenance Requirements Fire Staff has made the formal request to Sacramento for appiroval of positions required to staff this fire station. This station will add 1 Fire Captain, 1.6 Fire Apparatus Engineers and 5.2 Firefighters for a total of 8 new positions. It is anticipated that the staff will be ready for duty by November 1, 2001. ~ The fire engine is already in place and in-service within the pity's existing fleet of equipment. Finally, the City Manager also sent a letter to all residents them of this project. A copy of that letter is also attached. FISCAL IMPACT: The City Council authorized a $2° 2001, meeting for the interim stations capital costs. This all Fund Unreserved Fund Balance will satisfy the costs of November 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Detailed Site Map Letter to Vail Ranch Residents Breakdown of Project Costs the Vail Ranch community advising )allocation at the September 11, m of $562,000 from the General ng the interim fire station from R9CIT V MGR\YATGSG\InmrimGrcwd#p~+^ dac z~~ N Y g~ N o a in v r O 0 ~ N Q M t r U ~, C ~ f0 ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ N N C _O L d-+ '^ L v' O oa LL ~'FG I ~•(,q >S> C~ eq 9>>q~ f~lQF y>'6 I q9g~ a j b NI ' c~ ~F fCa f<a f(r f~Jf i>6j sgBS6 q9j6 gyBe rg9jq 3 S I I i ~ + i r +C [p fCe f~0 q z 9~9 9BJ> gyeAj qy@>S ff~f qyS ' 1 I III ~ ~~ F a I p Si'r' ~~ q99'. Q~. ~o'~t°i ~ ~. V ~ ~QP 4Ee eNC , I '~ 9 fCigyy RES~~ f(agy lb I`L f<;qy #~ S`S 06 9 ~ yq2 ~- .. C /' ~ ~ 1 `_ . % ` QyBeq ~ ~5W E55 / I~~ Q ~ 1 /b~. I' P g ,6 O ~ N r > qye G C~gy f(O ' '('~ ,r'S/ f(a$ / f(O S6 y26 yJ 8 q _ _ ~ ~ p~~3 ~ ~ __ $1J € ~ % > r 1 r r ' ' 1 i ` 6~h Zµ 1 1 Y 1 1 / 1 ;" _. _ -500 .. ___ ._--~ ~ Q ? /yam N N q~~ /~ ~ r Qp '1'C ' +A A a y~P y99 ~ ~ I6 _ ~ .. -... ~. .l ..~ ~ S 1,.... ~ N<6~ ,p3•V~- -- ~.,, - ___.____ ~ _ NT .-_ f.~C ~~ e S ' 0 ~ _ .. " ~ ~ - _ FAC x ~~ ~ pQO~ ~~ a / ~ ~ ' °et. ~ 1 } 0q >o yye3 n~ SS ~~ N qyg A9 a'a~ t > fn x ' i 5>f 9Y'> ~ ` qy9 I r ~ ~ f > { I - `: ~S ~1 -----' -- ~~~9. 1 r.. i }>A r Sq City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive•Temecula, G9 92590•Mailing 19091 SOb-5100 • Fax 19091 694-6499 September 18, 2001 Dear Vail Ranch Resident: As you all are aware, Vail Ranch residents joined our be would again like to welcome you as an official resident of always provided a high level of public safety to our resides plans to expand this level of service in your area. The City's General Plan calls for a goal of maintaining a fi~ emergency medical calls in order to improve public sa conditioned the Wolf Creek developer to dedicate land construction of a permanent fire station to be located or completion of a permanent fire station will take between provide a high level of public safety to the residents of Vai construct an interim station within the Vail Ranch Developr to be operational until the permanent Wolf Valley Station is The location of the interim fire station is proposed on the Redhawk Parkway. Once the permanent fire station is co proceed with improving the site on Overland Trail as a nest will begin master planning this property within 12 months. side of Overland Trail east of ed in Wolf Creek, the City will god park. In addition, the City As a final point, we would like you to know that the interimfire station will include landscaping and appropriate measures will be taken to ensure that the station is attractive while it meets the goal of improving public safety for your community. As planning for this facility proceeds, the City Council w meetings. If you would like additional information or have Yates, Assistant to the City Manager at (909) 506-5100. Sincerely, . ~1 ~-'~- Shawn D. Nelson City Manager ® Printed an ae[YClea Pdper Address: PO. Box 9033•Temecula, CA 92589-9033 iful City on July 1, 2001, and we City. The City of Temecula has and we wanted to share with you ~-minute response time for fire and :ty. To meet this goal, the City ind provide partial funding for the Wolf Valley Road. However, the two to three years. Therefore, to Ranch now, the City is planning to ent. This interim station is planned be discussing this issue at future ~y questions, please contact Grant R:~ntlmn~2001 CgnCSNnlCflm Fvc Swbn- Vail Ruch resiECn¢doc i BUDGET VAIL RANCH INTERIM STATION (8 Month s) (Annual) 1. Flag Pole $ 1,500 -0- 2. Landscape $ 15,000 -0- 3. Site Work A. Grading/Paving $ 30,000 B. Concrete Pad $ 5,000 C. Wet Utilities $ 15,000 D. Dry Utilities $ 15,000 E. Fencing/Gate $ 10,000 F. Signage $ 1,500 -0- G. Lighting $ 1,500 H. 15% Contingency $ 11,700 4. Resident Modular $ 34,240 -0- (Purchase) 5. FF&E's (See attached Fire Department list) $ 19,150 -0- 6. Business Modular Set up $ 1,600 -0- (Lease Agreement) $ 5,520 $ 8,280 A. 2 Year Total: $16,560.00 B. 3 Year Total: $24,840.00 7. Awning 30' X 40' $ 8,500 -0- 8. Staffing Costs $ 561,357 $ 842,035 Includes: 1 Captain 1.6 Fire Apparatus Engineers 5.2 Fire Fighter II's 9. Utility Costs A. Electric $ 5,112 $ 7,667 B. Phone $ 1,600 $ 2,400 TOTAL BUDGET $743,279 $ 860,382 INTERIM FIRE STATION City of Temecula Fire D IES ESTIMATED COST 6 Gear Lockers, 78X15X18 6 XL Twin Beds with frames 6 Bedspreads 6 Pillows 24 Flat Sheets 12 Pillow Cases 12 Twin Blankets $ 900 $ 3,220 $ 150 $ 120 $ 400 $ 160 $ 450 SUBTOTAL $ 5,400 3 Recliner Chairs 2 End Tables 2 Lamps 1 Television 25" 1 Video Cassette Recorder 1 Television Stand 4 Wall Clocks $ 1,200 $ 300 $ 100 $ 450 $ 150 $ 200 $ 100 SUBTOTAL $ 2,500 BEDROOMS: DAYROOM: OFFICE: 1 Clerical Desk, 30X60 1 5 Drawer File Cabinet, Letter Size 1 Manager Office Chair W/ Arms & C 2 Guest Stacking Office Chairs W/O 2 Telephones 1 Cordless Telephone 1 Computer Desk 2 Book Shelves 36 X 15 X 84 3 Bulletin Boards 4 Trash Cans 12 File Trays 1 Computer 1 Printer- Inkjet 1 Fax Machine 1 Copy Machine $ 850 $ 250 $ 400 $ 180 $ 100 $ 100 $ 200 $ 600 $ 150 $ 120 $ 30 $ 3, 500 $ 300 $ 200 $ 450 SUBTOTAL $ 7,430 KITCHEN: 1 Coffee Maker 1 Toaster 10 Dinner Plates 10 Soup Bowls 10 Coffee Cups 10 Drinking Glasses 10 Sets of Silverware 2 Frying Pans W/Lids 8" 2 Frying Pans W/Lids 12" 2 Sauce Pans W/Lids 1 Ot. 2 Sauce Pans W/Lids 3 Ot. 1 Set of Kitchen Knives W/Holder 1 Set of Steak Knives 1 Set of Kitchen Canisters 1 Cutting Board 1 Kitchen Table 4 Folding Chairs 1 Propane Bar-B-Cue 1 Corning Ware Cooking Set 1 Set Plastic Storage Containers 1 Hand Mixer 1 Blender 1 Crock Pot 1 Dutch Oven W/Lid AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES: 1 Shop Vacuum, Wet & Dry-10 Gal 1 Creeper 1 Complete Toolbox 1 Hand Grease Gun 1 Battery Filler Container 1 Battery Post Cleaner 1 Hydrometer 1 Flammable Safety Can,14 Gal. 1 Gas Can W/Spout, 5 Gal. 1 Droplight Cord, 50 Ft. 2 Extension Cords, 50 Ft. 1 Battery Charger 1 Metal Storage Cabinet 1 Flammable Storage Cabinet, 40 2 Plastic Buckets, 10 Ot. 1 Funnel $ 150 $ 40 $ 100 $ 100 $ 30 $ 30 $ 40 $ 40 $ 40 $ 30 $ 35 $ 30 $ 15 $ 30 $ 20 $ 100 $ 100 $ 300 $ 40 $ 30 $ 30 $ 40 $ 40 $ 30 SUBTOTAL $ 1,440 $ 200 $ 40 $ 450 $ 25 $ 25 $ 5 $ 25 $ 75 $ 35 $ 30 $ 50 $ 150 $ 300 $ 500 $ 10 $ 10 SUBTOTAL $ 1,930 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT: 1 Emergency Water Container, 55 C 1 Biohazard Waste Can W/Plastic L 1 Biohazard Waste Liners, 100cs 3 1 Metal Cabinet, 2 Door 78 X 48 X Emergency Disaster Storage in. $ 50 $ 40 $ 60 $ 300 SUBTOTAL $ 450 GRAND TOTAL: $ 19,150.00 ITEM 1 ATTORNEY CTOR OF FINANC MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Howard Windsor, Fire Chief >~~ DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Interim Fire Station Residential Facility RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the purchase of the residential module Interim Fire Station from San Diego Manufactured Housing Companyfor a total amount of $34,240. DISCUSSION: At the September 11, 2001 City Council meeting staffwas directed to pursue the establishment of an Interim Fire Station in the Vail Ranch area. The strategic geographical location of the Interim Fire Station is essential for maintaining a five (5) minute emergency response time to the Vail Ranch area. It is the intention of this Interim Fire Station to remain in operation until the permanent Wolf Creek Fire Station is completed and fully operational. The anticipated duration of the interim Fire Station is between 24 and 36 months. ~ In order to meet the November 15' deadline, the City manager pre-approved the purchase of the modular facility to allow for the necessary 4 to 5 week manufacture and delivery of the unit. This purchase is a sole source purchase based on the immediatie need and associated lead-time to manufacture the modular facility. Staffs research has indicated that this purchase agreement is competitively priced. It is estimated that the fair market value of the modular facility will be over $20,000 at the end of the 36-month period. The proposed facility is considered a turnkey residential facility that can be easily placed and removed from the site. This facility is a single story modular structure and is approximately 1,023 square feet and designed with two (2) bedrooms two (2) bathrooms with living and complete kitchen and dinning areas. The total lodging capacity of the facility will accommodate all of the proposed Interim Fire Station personnel. Also, the modular unit will be ADA compliant and will meet orexceed all building and safety codes. The anticipated delivery is four(4) to five (5) weeks from the time of order. The purchase includes all escrow and fees, delivery to the site, above ground setup, custom skirting two (2) custom up and insteps, three (3) ton air conditioning unit and home appliances with washer and dryer ~ FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available from the Initjal appropriation of $250,000. Attachment: Purchase Proposal From San Diego Manufactured Housing Ham, aAn ulerauRMA1VUhACTURED HO ~P 19~2DU3 U4:12PM PS 10514 Mis[ion verge Rd. USINt3 785322 - Spnice, fA 97071 (6191 M9.1440 ~ FAX (619) 449.2021 NOTICE: THIS FORM IS COPYRIGHTED AND REPRODUCTION OF qU. OR PART IS STRIC L.._-_r, TLY FORRIpDEN. MANUFACTURED HOME PURCHASE ORDER AND FEDERAL DISCLO SURE STATEN NT PURGiA$ER: I E: ADDRESS: % CITY: _ STA : 9P: SALES ERSON: f L v P.r ro Nw Mrrm and Earldirif ns frorpd on aGh iYd[s ddlu BRnemr+5[Sa Vfrca tv w4 aNl Wrdvwr °'9'pi[ b wrAl 6w Nip MGv4,k AFFa.%MEi. liwnc +%~~ _ r,OOFL s xPPmx.IHRnCL. ELY ' w DusEa ~y xpm / x /,ppnp%. /o~ppN~e-pTxo.' p '/ N[/ OfJ.W~IRr. KT/! T,tiC:Mil WT11ENNMBL MNFFJCµ1pE9 THE ysTPpepIC[BfyATry[ff lTdE. [p . rt . W lp G M FI' ' ~ T gq r ~ / . .. i roNeM. pNS'FI$ ~ ~_ ~prlE%LNUw,;_Ynm.~%%re0 ! aL/f/ /IfFQ NOME E w'rt Nm.om. BBCpw ereP .. s)frrroTrFA mraESeaes r%rr,pua',UST SaArwa proTnreol S.. REMRC-0 ACCE$501RES AND THEtfi COSTS. (SEE RODE RUMS ~ ~__ IE~ I ~ ~ ~~~~77 _ ~ ~, -i~fS~~ ` .. ~ ~ "7F~E _ Yr~~w ~{j ~y{j . L ... E F tr / ~G+IY ~ N~ . f < HO M~ ' e + d y ~ / . ~ - ~ y -, j~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AL E IES(WTSIPEMOME) /F f ! /Ir~i { • ,rY / i i - {/(/r ~.v r TOTAL MFG HOME 6 ACCESSORIES f ' /' A ' ,[ ~ /.y~7~/ T~~~ ~J~,r, ,. H SAFES TAX (ITEMS NOT INTE(%RAL TO p E~ S G/~' ~ I'Yr !A A'~':~c* _r ~ WUNOATION SVSTEMITIE pOWNS J DEUVERV N ~ i/ ~„/~ f i ' M ~f .wrE wnl,4r Bmpsoxs SET UP /}NO p ~ ~ f ... _... .- HCOFEF~ .. f q 9{ ~ "ti ' IN,$URANCE PREMIUM (ONLY IF.SOLU B Y OEALERi f ~, / ~ 1 ~ uu Yrnwf -T^~- -~- nccouM Ne ESCROW FEES ', ~ f _ $CNOpL FEES S' _ TG OTHER I PRE PAID TAXES ~ I E RESS/PHONE DOG FEE (NOT A GtBYERNMENTAL CHp ROE) ~f THE MANUFACRIRER STATES THAT INSUUTION HAS BEEN 1. TOTAL CAEN PRICE ~ E INSTALLED IH THI 5 NOME AS FOLLO WS (NEw ONLY) ALLOWANCE ON TNADE-W $ _ TYPE ._._ THICKNESS 'R'EACTOR LESS SAL OUE ADOVE f ' ROOF NET ALLOWANCE E ~ ' f%IERIOF WALLS _ PAIp HEREWITH S - FLC:JH ^ 'FA9H BEFORE DEL S i::. indpdp6 in Ihls ADrpem¢nt Iw - UESIONATED DEPOSIT S' r 1, f emar~b Insurarge, PayrTani for such r ' (WG. RJ ON PNIT7 . .. ~ .u: p: nd.~:J by Vr;b r,.yrpernerit. - R. lESf BUYERS IEOINN PA7MEM S '!( fhe l1BelET i5 also llCBrrSBtl as a tea! estate DIOkBI, the sale S. UNPAip RAL ON CAEH EALES PRIC E E 01 a ma/10/aCEU/e(y home O[ mobilahome being InStalletl OR a 4• flNAHCE CHAIOE E ~ f0urtlafigl system pursuant t0 $ech'On 185.51 may he s. ANNUM PERCENTAGE kATE % included in Mte pUrCltase tlOCUrlle/1E 70r the underlying Ieal O. TOTAL PAYMENT AMOUNT (BW) E property, providetl that Elie fAQUfI'9111BId5 O( H$C $$C. T. UNPAID 9AIANCE DUE PRIOR TO D EL $ Id035.3 ar0 mOt" e. TOTAL!>FFEAAED PA7ME14T PRICE ( Eofi) S ~ ^ PAYA&E AS FOLLOWS: TFIE DEALER CERTIFIES THAT THE _ _ INSTALVFTION CONTPAC70R IS: NAME }.IC. Y BUSINESS ADDRESS ~ b rve ererc pN marxlEpWN nom. urnol tr: O pNrb Ins uPwJ 0¢YVery lisle dw: 10 npryeAa eRprap'erwGr ouµcBao mgWM nurrcv aY BIC grypt, Buyur Bfrun b GITy A ZIP om a Bc IWlorYg el IM aplbn ul :tNU, e,V pr (l) b pry f ~~ A CwWaCler k N~raBtl bJ ¢W IB be I~nfBd 8M uFUIBd py RIB 'mrpu pr O+v r%fl a nun,rtrLreE Iwme ir reB ruwu Y u neurrrW in aufum b au Dover m Nfnnelbn ewWrce w ceN4csu a llaavmrm urma w 1~7 P'+r M B%e canb[a«B slab Lk¢n[p Bpara. P.o. eP% 2e000 spapnbmo, cA 95827. ~ ~ a s--__.- ~ _ :.,, a bla Bunsiaraw. f ~ [A) DO NOT SIGN THE PURCHASE AGgEEMENT BEFORE YOU REA P 1T OR IF R CONTAINS' ANY BLANK SPACES TO BE FILLED IN. (B) YOU ARE ENTRLED YO A COMPCETELV i iLLED-IN COPY OF THAT rIGREEh1ENT AND, IF PURCHASING A MANUFACTUREDIMOBILE HOME COVERED BY A WARRANTY, A COPY m Of THE WARRANTY. Collfilaillts mrlrBminp the purchase shall be relerreU W [he dealer antl, R the co plalm Is not resolved, may be resorted to the Department of Houslnn99 and Community-Development, Plvlsbn al Codes and Standards, tNi:j Swc 31, Sacramento, Cal(lomia 958ig-0031 ONeplrone (St1D) 952-5275). A Im7ure to disdose Pursuant to Isi lpatlonal Licensing, Post ORic9 s genlon mall not be Me 6asH iw reclssion of a mnditbnal sale conlred. The Manulaauretl Home that I errs plimhasulg wlf be used as a residepce. 1 further ceNty chat I undersle ntl tlial it subjepl Marwiadurad Home U used for any purpose Offset than a reWdence, I mey be liable, to the Stale Boats of EquaEzatiG ,lo! the tax maesUrell Dy 111p arnoun[e%duded PumuaM lO INS certilicale. ' PURCHASER- DATE RECEIPT Of A fILLED-W COPY OF THIS AGRFEMFtYT IS HERE6Y ACKNOWLEDGED 4 7 PUROIASFR 'i I:a PercLaBn Order % subject b Qed'n aPPr¢val Arid k rwl olndiliR unless sfjrxpf by an eWhol¢fe reaa[emeave of p eFer. Purrnexr cerolba met he is I .:( IsyG LLJa. +11U .r,Jreps IG aiyn a RBNMy Apw6rtleni BLCOrt6e9 la Ina bans nercn. In t116 event peyoll fig res ¢n a the PUICnaBpr iMrpby aJl[CB kl paY tilk a%Ep6i nl 11>rIC lignG are IINN[ R1Bn 9lWled CY lil¢ PunRR9pr InamuO Yti M IIaRS-in Ior2rP Rte Wra'pw el a On RBnIBM. . ... , . .. ua CUfLLITf6NL sEt n[,FTH ON THE kEVERSE OF tHIS Ar IfFEMENi ARE IN[ORP(YR ` - ATED HEREIN Alva ANE , ..r. Y fuss A> inbSE acs F(iaYE! bN Tf IE FRONT s1aF OF iri15 A :::rl. I PURCHASER- E LER - -- .. ~_ L S PURCHASER: SELLER: --_ DATE RD AUTHDRITEO REPRESENTATIVE OF DEALER ~ia1°N°r ,mein pprrN'~.rr.~i,w[seo[-Plm.aB~nu FROM FRX IvO. Sep. 1~ 2001 01: S1PM P1 Proposal September f3, 2001 Attn: Mika Richey City of Temecula Fire Department Fax 909.676.8751 Ofc 909.506.3104 Pgr 909.370.5204 RE: Fleetwood Mode166626 (ALL ELECTRIC HOME) Floor Plan and Spec Sheet Included Home inGudes delivery to jobsite, above ground set on an approved pig specification, custom skirting to match home, two (2) custom up and in and a 3 ton air conditioner; installed, and all home appliances including and dryer. Includes escrow and HCD fees. rand pad Home DOES NOT include grading, utilities or hook-ups, on-site costs, or permits. All monies has to be in escrow before home is ordered. COST: S34,T40 DELIVERY; 4 - 5 weeks (approx.) from time home is ordered. SET UP: 7 - 10 days (approx.) from time home comes off line PRICES QUOTED GOOD FOR 30 DAYS FROM TODAY'S Doug Hyde San Diego Manufactured Housing Ofc 619-449-1440 Fax 619-049.8627 G~~G7ion/ ~, eta Nd y~liTS ~- f1~G /Nv~T Gl~iO l,B,~ " ~~G~-av, HGO ~~. ~' 3~Z~v' c~' /y. TEMECULA CO SERVICES DI MUNITY TRICT ITEM 1 APPROV ATTORNEY VCE DIRECTOR MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULI AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker. Director DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: S.M.A.R.T. Program Services PREPARED BY: Julie Crowe-Pelletier RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors presentation regarding the "Summer Months Activities and program. BACKGROUND: As a direct result of a request and approved by all members of the City Council, the prof reality. In late June of 2001, the Community Services S.M.A. R.T. program to the citizen's of Temecula. This progre 15 years, the opportunity to participate in a free, drop-in sups games, arts and crafts, sports, water games, special event: held Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. at Winches Park, Pala Community Park, Temeku Hills Park and the City' and Nighthawk Pass. With the help of city staff, parents and Temecula's youth, tremendous success. Tonight we have a special video presentation that it FISCAL IMPACT: None Superintendent and file this report and video on in Temecula" (S.M.A.R.T.) Wade by Council member, Jeff Stone ram known as S.M.A.R.T became a )epartment officially introduced the n was designed to offer youth ages 7- visedsummer program that included and much more. The program was er Creek Park, Margarita Community new park site at Vail Ranch Parkway S.M.A. R. T. program of 2001 was a the success ofthe program R:\CROW EJ W GENDAS\SMARTdoc TCSD DEPARTME TAL REPOR~ APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifica System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the c as the top ranked firm. The Board of Directors awarded a co Staff has reviewed the first draft document and a draft copy ha for their comments. Staff anticipates bringing the final draft Commission and the Board of Directors in October. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Direc Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one rar architect and project design committee has completed the Board of Directors approved the Master Plan on June 27, 2( Design Group on July 11, 2000, for the Phase II of the Design a contract to California Commercial Pools on July 10, 2001 ai 2001. The pool is under construction and on schedule. completed by early spring. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the c constructed in the City. Statements of Qualifications were rep interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on March awarded to RJM Design Group at the May 23, 2000, Board o' committee was held on November 7, 2000. With the adoption o January 23, 2001 City Council meeting, it has been determin located in the Wolf Creek development. A community worksho architect is drafting a plan based on the information compiled league questionnaires. A committee meeting was held on conceptual plan. The Master Plan will go forward to the Comml City Council in the near future. R:~ZIGLERGV(DEPTRP710901.doc Services (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi-Trail ttee selected KTU& Associates t to KTU&A on March 28, 2000. ~n mailed out to the committee in and to the Community Services asign of an aquatic facility to be rs approved a Scope of Services :d firm, RJM Design Group. The erratic design of the project. The ), and awarded a contract to RJM mtract. The City Council awarded construction began on August 13, ff anticipates construction will be sign of a sports complex to be eived on February 16, 2000, and B, 2000. A design contract was Directors meeting. The first sub- theWolf Creek Specific Plan at the 'd the 40 acre sports park will be was held on April 7, 2001, and the `rom the workshop and the sports luly 10, 2001 to review the final Wily Services Commission and the September 20, 2001 The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adop Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for 1 specifications for the Temecula Public Library. LPA submit second plan check and staff has received proposals to a RFQ the California State Library's Bond Act 2000. Staff released an RFQ for the children's museum interior spacf construction and installation. Interviews were held of the four t Staff began negotiations with the top ranked firm, Sparks Agreement and Scope of Services was approved by the City C committee has been meeting and has proposed naming the Temecula Children's Museum". Astaffreportwentforwardtot on May 14, 2001, and they unanimously approved a recomme the facility. A meeting was held on July 5, 2001 to review the F storyline was presented and well received by all present. Desi~ A committee meeting will be held September 26, 2001. at the September 26, 2000 City final construction documents and the construction documents for grant writing services to apply for planning, exhibit design, fabrication, p ranked firms on October 17, 2000. Exhibits and Environments. The ~uncil on December 12, 2000. The acility "Imagination Workshop, The e Community Services Commission idation to the City Council to name eliminary conceptual plans. Anew n is underway for this new concept. The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects within the City including Wolf Creek, Roripaugh and Harveston, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the contract for refuse and recycling and assessment administration. ~ The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance Division assists in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation Division is currently programming for Half annual Halloween Spooktacular to be held at the Temecula October 26, 2001. In addition, staff is putting together the n Department's Winter/Spring 2002 Recreation Brochure. R:IZIGLERGIXDEPTRPT\0901.doc en festivities which includes our ate Park's roller hockey arena on issue of the Community Services September 2Q, 2001 REDEVELOP'~MENT AGENC ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOI SEPTEMBER 11, 2( A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of August 28, 2001. MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to approve Con; motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS No comments. AGENCY .y was called to order at 7:25 Temecula. Naggar, Pratt, Stone, and City Clerk Jones. Calendar Item No. 1. The reflected unanimous approval. R:\Minutes.rda\091101 1 ADJOURNMENT At 7:25 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Tuesday, September 25, 2001, in the City Council C Temecula. California. was formally adjourned to 43200 Business Park Drive, Ron Roberts, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:UAinutes.rda\091101 2 ITEM APPROVAL ITY ATTORNEY INANCE DIREC' ITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Redevelopment FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Financial Statements for the F Members Year Ended June 30, 2001 PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members: 1. Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 . 2. Increase the revenue estimates for property tax increment in the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund (595,100) and Debt Service Fund ($379,399). 3. Approve an appropriation of $202,244 to the passt Service Fund. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements Redevelopment Agency for the Fiscal Year ended June financial statements for an analytical review of financial The requested budget adjustments are the result of hig increment revenue being received for the fiscal year. This values in the project area (especially those surrounding ar additional tax increment revenue results in an incre~ expenditures to other local agencies, as these passthroul gross tax increment revenue received by the City. h agreement line item in the Debt ct the unaudited activity of the 2001. Please see the attached :r than expected supplemental tax crease is due to increased property including the Promenade Malq. The in the amount of passthrough s are based on a percentage of the FISCAL IMPACT: The increase in tax increment revenue will result in a net increase of 5237,250 in available revenues to the Debt Service and Redevelopment Funds, and a 595,100 increase in available revenues to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund. ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 TEMECULA REDEVELO Combining Balance Sheet as and the Statement of Revenues, Expendi Fund Balance For The Fisc June 30, 20( (Unaudited) ENT AGENCY >f June 30, 2001 :ures and Changes in al Year Ended ~1 Prepared by the Finance Temecula Redevelopment Agency combining Balance Sheet As of June 30, 2001 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Land held for resale " 'total assets Liabilities and fund balances Liabilities: Other current liabilities Deferred revenue Total liabilities i~und balances: Reserved Designated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances Please note that these balances are unaudited Low/Mod $ 5,927,706 $ 1,079,278 1,839,602 910,176 2,103,053 $ 7,767,308 $ 4,092,507 $ 17,362 $ 789,506 9 952,167 162,059 969,529 951,565 6,797,779 2,635,632 505,310 6,797,779 3,140,942 $ 7,767,308 $ 4,092,507 Debt Service Total £ 3,321,723 $ 10,328,707 266,537 3,016,315 2,103,053 3,588,260 $ 15,448,075 811,0]8 $ 1,617,886 1,114,226 811,018 2,732,112 1,448,920 10,882,331 1,328,322 1,833,632 2,777,242 12,715,963 i 3,588,260 $ 15,448,075 1 City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditwes and Changes m Fund Balance -Budget and Actual Redevelopr.:entAgenty Low/Moderate Income Housing For the Fi::cal Yeaz Ended June 30, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Revenues: Property tax increment Investment interest Rental income Miscellaneous 'total Revenues Expenditures: Salaries and wages Operating and administrative expenditures Homebuyer programs Residential rehabilitation programs Housing development & acquisition Affordable housing /future obligation Total Expendi[mes Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begi~ming Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 $ 1,765,000 $ 1,860,100 280,000 292,216 2,000 7,167 7,200 113,156 2,054,200 2,272,639 215,320 167,098 295,460 186,991 $ 300,000 1,058,680 203,336 4,000,000 36,549 305,000 305,000 6,174,460 898,974 (4,120,260) 1,373,665 5,424,115 5,424,115 $ 1,303,855 $ 6,797,780 Notes: (1) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May each fiscal yeaz. (2) The variance m operating and administrative expenditures is primarily due to lower than and consulting costs being incurred. (3) Minimal costs have been intoned to date on the Senior Housing and Pujol Neighborhood Total Percent Activity of Budget $ 1,860,100 105% (1) 292,216 104% 7,167 358% 113,156 1572% 2,272,639 111% 167,098 78% 46,114 233,105 79% (2) 36,562 239,898 23% 36,549 1% (3) 305,000 100% 82,676 981,650 16% legal protects. 2 City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency- Redevelopment For the Fisca] Yeaz Ended June 3Q, 2001 Revenues: Investment interest Renal income Loan interest Reimbursements Operating transfers in Total Revenues Annual Amended $ 140,000 64,000 15,200 1,392,316 955,000 2,566,516 25,000 5,200,647 850 3,100 175,000 $ 145,616 123,393 15,295 1,143,063 955,000 2,382,367 Capita] Projects (4): Public ResVooms Adjacent to O.T. First SVeet bridge Front Street widening Old Town streetscape Old Town central parking lot Operations and Maintenance: Salaries and wages Operating and administrative expenditures Owner participation agreements Old Toe1~ plan implementation Old Town development incentives Old Town building facades Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begimwrg Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 Notes: 74,750 289,230 310,000 78,450 200,000 299,399 6,656,426 (4,OS9,910) YTD 4,231,854 $ 72,418 204,306 300,000 77,099 119,329 5,005,006 (2,622,639) 5,763,581 5,763,581 $ 1,673,671 $ 3,140,942 (1) The vaiiance in investment interest is due to higher than anticipated cash balances being maintained during the fiscal yeaz. (2) The variance is due to the renewal of the Reeves property lease. (3) The variance itt operating and administrative expenditures is due primarily to lower than anticipating legal, consulting, and other outside services costs being incurred. (4) No costs have yet been incurred for providing development incentives in Old Town. Tota] $ 145,616 123,393 15,295 1,143,063 955,000 2,382,367 4,501,201 72,418 223,902 300,000 77,099 184,878 5,359,498 Percent f Budget 104% (1) 193% (2) 101% 82% 100% 93% 87% 97% 77% (3) 97% 98% (4) 62% 81% 3 City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency -Deb[ Service For the Fiscal Year Ended June 3Q, 2001 Revenues: Property tax increment Investment interest Advances from other funds Deferred passthrough Total Revenues Annual Amended $ 7,061,000 150,000 75,750 1,831,000 9,117,750 YTD Activity $ 7,440,399 211,908 75,749 1,153,119 8,881,175 Expenditures Pass[ltrough agreements Debt service -principal Debt service -interest Miscellaneous Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues~Over/(Under) Expenditures 5,241,000 1,244,000 1,040,050 7,500 2,184,270 9,716,820 (599,070) 5,443,244 725,000 1,039,753 5,952 1,642,000 8,855,949 25,226 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fmrd Balance, June 3Q, 2001 Notes: 2,752,016 2,752,016 $ 2,152,946 $ 2,777,242 (1) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance in the deferred passthrough line item is due to the current portion of the county's passthrough being recorded in the Due To Other Govetments account Percent 105% (1) 141% 100% 63% (2) 97% 104% 58% ]00% 79% 75% 91% 4 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPOR~ ~ _ ~ r ~. Y.~ .~ _. __~~~ APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEYE AGENDA TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Attached for Department. Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency John Meyer, Redevelopment Director September 25, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report your as First Time Homebuvers Program Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 01 Residential Improvement Programs The program budget for FY 01/02 is $250,000 and $43,1 Affordable Housing AGENCY has been funded. Two projects have been submitted for preliminary review. Qne project is from the Agency's development partner, the other from a property owner who is also interested in developing affordable housing. Staff is analyzing these proposals. Senior Housing Agency staff is negotiating with a development partner to housing. A senior housing demand study is being condw Old Town Community Theater The Redevelopment Agency Board approved the Community April 24, 2001. The Architect has begun the next Phase development and construction drawings. 96 units for affordable senior ieater's Master Plan at its meeting of the design, which includes design R:GSYERSI(1MONTHLLYtreport.augusl0l.doc Facade Imorovement/Non-Conforming Sian Program The following facade improvement/sign projects have rece • The Stampede - Paint Exterior • Old Town Plaza Shopping Center - Refinish Exterior and Signs for all units • Chaparral Building - Stain Exterior The following is the most recent inventory of the current • In compliance with the Old Town Sign Programs • Work in Progress • Code Enforcement Follow-up • New Business Old Town Promotions/Marketing Hot Summer Nights concluded on September 28. The Ag events overthe next few months. The events include Howl-~ carving contests, a craft fair and live entertainment, Chri; carolers, live entertainment, pictures with Santa and a craft been completed: ~ projects: 22 13 10 1 46 is also sponsoring several other ~n in Old Town featuring pumpkin in Old Town featuring strolling R:ISYERSKUdONTHLLWeport. a ug ust0l.doc ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECUL/ AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/Cit Co cil FROM: Debbie Ubnos Director of Planning DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Development Code Amendment (Planning A and lodge meeting halls, compact parking signage, minimum lot area, and commercial ATTORNEY CTOR OF FI ~plication 01-0120 -non-profit clubs spaces, courtesy curbs, temporary offsets) PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and read by title only an ORDINANCE N0. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COON TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS TEMECULA MUNICIPAL COC TYPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER MIND DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING AF BACKGROUND: The Development Code was adopte its adoption, the Code has been periodically amended various provisions as problems are identified. These improve clarity, to provide additional direction, and to corre~ Commission considered these amendments at its August the Commission received public testimony and continue second unit and political signage provisions and is recomm proposed changes to allow non-profit clubs and lodge m~ Low -2, and Low Medium residential zones. In addition t. minor changes, the Planning Commission is recommer Development Code Amendments. entitled: L OF THE CITY OF AND 17 OF THE TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE _ICATION 01-0120) by the City Council in 1995. Since improve its clarity and to modify roposed changes are intended to typographical errors. The Planning 5, 2001 meeting. At this meeting, the proposed amendments to the nding that the Council not adopt the sting halls in the Very Low, Low-1, a number of typographic and other ling the following changes to the Compact Parking Spaces-The Commission had previously expressed a concern that compact spaces were not meeting the needs of dri ~ ers. At the Commission's request, staff presented several options to the Commission. The options ranged from reducing the allowable percentage to prohibiting compact parking spaces. The Commission is recommending that compact parking spaces no longer be allowed for new development. Courtesy Curbs-The Code requires landscaped planters to be constructed in vehicle parking lots. In practice, the landscape material in planters adjacent to vehicle parking spaces is being damaged by foot traffic from people~exiting their vehicles. In an attempt to provide an appropriate stepping area for p rsons exiting their vehicles, the Commission is recommending amending the Code to require a minimum 12 inch wide R:\DEVCODE\01-0120 Nrendment\staM report cc2.tloc concrete courtesy curb on landscaped planters adjacent to parking spaces. This amendment would not reduce the width of the planted area in parking area landscaping. Temporary Signage-To clarify some confusion !about temporary signs in the fourth quarter of each year, the Commission is recom lending that the Council amend the ordinance to require a 30-day "down period" for attached temporary sign permitted during the fourth quarter. Previously, the Ordinance had not clearly require this down period. Minimum Lot Area-The City's General Plan and Development Code Sections 17.06.020.A through D describes the minimum lot size in terms of net acres while Table 17.06.040 describes minimum lot size in terms of r~ross acres. To resolve this conflict, the Planning Commission is recommending that the Table be amended to be consistent with the General Plan and refer to net lot area. ~ Commercial Building Offsets-Commercial dee large and small scale projects. The Developm development can produce buildings whose arc walls. The Code already clearly addresses this Commission is recommending that this provision an attempt to prevent "big box" commercial deve which is inconsistent with the Citywide Design Gui The Planning Commission continued discussions on two the modifications to requirements for political signs and sei allow staff and the City Attorney to provide additional inforr the Commission is not recommending that the Council a allowed Non-Profit Clubs and Lodge Meeting Halls in the Medium residential zones. At present, the only residential the medium and high residential zones. Environmental Determination An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this amendments would result in any environmental impacts Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Pi proposed amendments would not result in impacts bey City's General Plan and the supplemental analysis preps As a result, the Planning Commission recommends that that the potential impacts of these changes were Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and tl required. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact is anticipated. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance -Page 3 2. Planning Commission Resolution -Page 9 3. Planning Commission Staff Report -Page 11 4. Letter received by the Planning Commission ~ment within the City includes both Code recognizes that large scale :cture includes long unarticulated kern for industrial buildings. The added to Section 17.08.070.0.2 in ment with long unarticulated walls, the proposed code amendments, d dwelling units were continued to ion on these items. The one item, ~t a modification that would have ry Low, Low-1, Low -2, and Low yes this kind of use is allowed are eject to determine if the proposed yond those impacts identified in the The Checklist indicated that the i those originally anticipated for the I for the original Development Code. City Council make a determination equately addressed by the Final no further environmental analysis is 12 R:IDEVCODE101~0120 Amendmemistafl report cc2.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NC . 01-_ RIDEVCODElOb0120 Artentlment~staH re0on cc2.doc ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION 01-0129) WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and re general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the provides for the adoption and is by cities to implement such e requires that a zoning ordinance and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly oticed public hearing on August 15, 2001, and recommended that the City Council approve the following amendments to the City Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the and local ordinances; and, WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance ~ Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly notic 2001 to consider the proposed amendments to the C Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendments To The Citv Munii clarifications to Chapter 17 of the Temecula Municipal follows: requirements of State law posted at City Hall, Temecula 'y Chamber of Commerce; and, public hearing on September 11, Zoning Map and the Temecula DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS ode. The following minor code are hereby amended to read as A. Amend Section 17.06.020.E read, "Medium Density Residential (M). The medium density residential zoning district is intended to provide for the development of attached and detached residential development. Typical housing types may include single-family, duplexes, triplexes, townhouses and patio homes, with a density range of 7 - 12 dwelling units per acre:' B. Amend Section 17.06.020.E to read, "High Density Residential (H). The high density residential zoning district is intended to provides for the development of attached residential development. Typical housing types may include townhouses, stacked dwellings and apartments, with a density range of 13 - 20 dwelling unfits per acre." C. Amend Section 17.06.040, Table 17.06.040,amend the portion with the heading "Minimum gross lot area (acres)" to read, "Minimum net lot area (acres)". D. Amend Tables 17.08.040A and B of Sedtion 17.08.040 to add superscript numeral 1 to the end of the heading to read, "Minimum requi ed landscaped open space'". RIDEVCODEWI-0120 NrenErrent~sWH repon cc2.tloc 4 E. Amend Tables 17.08.040.A and B of section with a note that reads: "1. Minimum required include the necessary planting within the right-of-way." F. Amend Section 17.08.070.0.2 to unarticulated walls should be avoided. Wall planes for greater than fifty (50) feet without an offset or enl 17.08.040 to include a notes red open space area does not an item d which reads, "Long not extend in a continuous direction architecture articulation." G. Amend Section 17.24.040.E., to read, "Compact Car Parking. Compact car parking spaces shall not be allowed." H. Amend Section 17.24.OSO.H.6 to read, "All interior landscaped islands adjacent to vehicle parking spaces shall be protected and enclosed in a 12 inch concrete curb no less than 6 inches in height:' I. Amend Section 17.28.600.0.1 to read, " promotional signs during the first through third quarters year is one thirty (30) day period per quarter, with a coi during which time promotional signs are not permitted. through December) promotional signs are permitted for tv the temporary sign is down for at least thirty (30) days I again:' ie maximum duration for attached January through September) of the ecutive sixty (60) day down period, During the fourth quarter (October thirty (30) day periods provided that fore the temporary signage is used J. Amend Section 17.34.010 to read, '°'Lot coverage" means that portion of the lot that is covered by buildings and structures, which is derived as the quotient of the gross lot acreage divided by the area covered by the footprint(s) of tlje buildings or structures." Section 2. Amendments To The Citv Muni error corrections to Chapters 8 and 17 of the Temecula read as follows: A. Amend the first sentence of Section 8.16. allowed for compliance in the original notice, or as extent by the board of appeals, compliance has not been actor or the agency of which he is an officer may order the ha public officers or by employees of said agency, or may private contractor selected by the City in accordance with and under the terms specified by the City Council." The following typographic Code are hereby amended to ~ to read, "If at the end of the time in cases of appeal, or as specified shed, the officer issuing the notice sous vegetation to be removed by se removal to be carried out by a ~licable statutes and in the manner B. Amend the second sentence of Section 8.16.060 to read, "The cost of such removal accompanied by a reasonable administrative charge may be imposed as a special assessment upon the property, and such property shall be ~ubject to a special assessment lien for such purpose." C. Section 17.05.010.H, amend the fir t sentence of the paragraph to read, `The approving authority may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to the expiration, grant a time extension of one year (up to three extensions may be granted):' D. Section 17.080.060.0.5, modify the first word in the first sentence to read "Slope". RIDEVCODEl01-0120 Wrentlnrenl~slaH rapod cc2.doc E. Section 17.24.040.A, amend the Planning. sentence by capitalizing Director of Section 3. Severabilitv. The City Council heretiy declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be inv~lid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. Environmental Compliance An Env this project to determine if the proposed amendments woi beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environment and the supplemental analysis prepared for the original indicated that the proposed amendments would not res anticipated for the City General Plan and the supplemei Development Code. As a result, the Planning Commiss make a determination that the potential impacts of these by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the environmental analysis is required. Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as ~nmental Checklist was prepared for result in any environmental impacts Impact Report for the General Plan evelopment Code. The Checklist in impacts beyond those originally J analysis prepared for the original i recommends that the City Council ranges were adequately addressed ~neral Plan and that no further shall certify to the adoption of this ~d by law. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall) be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force) and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _th day of _, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) R:IDEVCODE101-0120 Amentlrrent~stan report cc2.tlx 6 I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of foregoing Ordinance No. 01-_ was dully introduced ar regular meeting of the City Council on the _th day of Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular th day of , 2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~mecula, do hereby certify that the placed upon its first reading at a _, 2001 and that thereafter, said Feting of the City Council on the Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:IDEVCODEW7-0120 Nrentlrrent~sWH report cc2.dot 7 ATTACHMENT N0. PLANNING COMMISSION RE RaDEVCODt101-0120 Amendrrenhstatt report w2.doc DRAF PC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENC COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINA ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNC TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO M AND OTHER MINOR CHANGES TO CODE" WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City General Plan; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City City's Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to and -031 MMISSION OF THE THAT THE CITV ENTITLED "AN OF THE CITY OF AND 17 OF THE i TYPOGRAPHICAL IE DEVELOPMENT of the City of Temecula adopted the of the City of Temecula adopted the the adopted Development Code; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission consideredthe proposed amendment on August 15, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify i ither in support or opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER ~S FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending Chapters 8 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to make typographical and other minor changes to the Municipal Code that is substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Envi this project to determine if the proposed amendments wou beyond those impacts identffied in the Final Environments The Checklist indicated that the proposed amendments those originally anticipated for the City General Plan and ti the original Development Code. As a result, the Plannir City Council make a determination that the potential impa< addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for environmental analysis is required. mmental Checklist was prepared for i result in any environmental impacts Impact P.eport for the General Plan. n+ould not result in impacts beyond supplemental analysis prepared for i Commission recommends that the s of these changes were adequately ie General Plan and that no further R:~DEVCODEWi-0120 MrntlmemlSUM flepon OC1.tlx J Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND Planning Commission this 15`" day of August, 2001. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular 2001, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: by the City of Temecula Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Ion was duly adopted by the Planning I thereof held on the 15`" day of August Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R10EVCODE~D1At20 Amentlrtent\RteM Report CC1.tloc ATTACHMENT NO.3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R:~DEVCODE~OI-0120 Pmentlment~StaM report cc2.tloc 11 STAFF REPORT - CITY OF PLANNING August 15, 2001 Planning Application No. 01-0120 Prepared by: Dave RECOMMENDATION: The Community Developn recommends the Planning PC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING O OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING TF APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHAPTERS 8 AND 17 OF THE TEMECI MAKE TYPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER I DEVELOPMENT CODE" BACKGROUND ENT CODE AMENDMENTS) Senior Planner Department -Planning Division Staff tmission: adopt a Resolution entitled: 11SSION OF THE CITY THE CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE OF THE IECULA AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE TO )R CHANGES TO THE The Development Code was adopted by the City Council in 1995. Since its adoption, the Code has been periodically amended to improve its clarity and to modi ~ various provisions as problems have been identified. These proposed changes are intended to~improve clarity, to provide additional direction, and to correct typographical errors. This staff report is intended to analyze the proposed changes for your review and consideration. ~ ANALYSIS The proposed changes are intended to achieve three objectives: provide policy interpretation, provide clarity, and correct typographical errors. The typographical changes, proposed in Attachment 1, are self- explanatory and are found in Sectior%s 8.16.060 and 17.05.010.H. The proposed policy and clarifications are listed below in Prooosed Policv Interpretations Non-Profit Clubs and Lodge Meeting Halls-Staff f months from people wanting to locate anon-profit cl City. The Development Code limits the placement of tl density residential zones excluding large areas where Available property zoned for medium or high densil limited, further complicating the placement of club recommending amending Section 17.06.030, Table 1; allow non-profit club and lodge meeting halls without tt in the Very Low (VL), Low (L-1 and L-2), and Low Medi R:~DEVCODE~D1-0120 AmendmenflPC Staff Report-8-15At.doc 1 ~s received several inquiries in recent ib and lodge meeting hall within the ese facilities to the medium and high hese uses might also be appropriate. i residential uses within the City is and lodge meeting halls. Staff is .06.030 of the Development Code to e sale of alcohol as a conditional use ~m (LM) residential zones to provide _,_-. more of an opportunity for location of such foci opportunity to review the potential impacts of the and recommend conditions that will mitigate ash hours of operation, site design and traffic. f conditional use permit (CUP) are violated, the C the CUP). Staff's recommendation is to amend Table 17.0E and lodge meeting halls in the VL, L-1, L-2, and ;s. As a conditional use staff has the eject on the surrounding residential uses ;ts of the operation pertaining to noise, ther, if conditions of approval on the has a legal recourse (i.e.: revocation of Ito conditionally permit non-profit clubs zones by editing the table as follows: Descri lion of Use HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls-without the sale of alcohol - C C C C P P Political Signage-The Code Enforcement Divi; orientation of political signs within the City. Lt displayed with the sign faces oriented toward one of another. As a result, the signs that were displa to reduce visual clutter and prevent postings of Section 17.28.050.0.2 of the Development Cod separation between political signs posted. m has express concerns regarding the t election season political signs were pother or with one sign mounted on top ~d had a larger sign face. In an attempt its nature, staff is recommending that be amended to provide fora 36 inch Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.28.050.0.2 to read, "Signs must be separated by no less than 36 inches. There shall be no limit on the number of signs during the ninety (90) days prior to a state, federal, or local election and fourteen (14) days after the election. A sign erected or placed for a candidate who prevails in a primary election may be maintained until 10 days after the final election." Second Dwelling Unit-Section 17.06.050.M.3 Code currently provides a property owner the flex square foot second dwelling unit in zones whe Residents with large lots who want to build unit approached staff. Analysis of this request indicate would be appropriate and is unlikely to Great recommends modifying the Code to permit second percent of the primary dwelling with the following the second dwelling unit cannot exceed 1,200 sq equal to 1 acre, the second dwelling unit cannot e. Sections 17.06.O50.M.3and 17.06.OSO.M.4addre: distinguishes between attached and detached. As dwelling unit does not change whether it is de' recommending the elimination of this distinction. Section 17.06.050.M3 and M4, add a new item M5, remaining items. Section 17.06.050.M.3 shall be amended to read lot may be attached or detached:' id 17.06.050.M.4 of the Development ility to build a 400 square foot to 1,200 the allowable density can be met. in excess of 1,200 square feet have that to allow a larger unit on larger lots significant adverse impacts. Staff welling units that are no greater than 75 pulations: 1) For lots less than 1 acre, ire feet and 2) for lots greater than or ;eed 2,000 square feet. the size of the second dwelling unit but ie Code is written the size of the second ched or attached; therefore, staff is Staff's recommendation is to amend nd renumber the section based on the follows, "A second unit on a residential R:\DEVCODE\01-0120 Amendment\PC Staff Repon-6.15-01.tloc Section 17.06.050.M.4 shall be amended to read as follows, "A second dwelling unit on a tot less than 1 acre shall not exceed 75 percent of the primary dwelling unit up to a maximum of 1,200 square feet." Insert a new Section number 17.06.050.M5 to lot of 1 acre or greater shall not exceed 75 maximum of 2,000 square feet " Compact Parking Spaces-At the December 6, issue of compact parking spaces was discusses compact spaces were not meeting the needs of tl spaces, thereby eliminating parking for other driver this issue back as an agendized item with tf amendments. Staff is proposing that the allowab from thirty (30%) percent to fifteen (15%) perc compromise that will not eliminate compact space amount of compact parking spaces each business vehicles. Staff proposes to amend the first sen "Compact Car Parking. Up to fifteen percent of tl compact cars " Courtesy Curbs-The Code requires landscape parking lots. In practice, the landscape material spaces is being damaged by foot traffic from peop provide an appropriate stepping area for pe recommending amending the Code to require a landscaped planters adjacent to vehicle parking s follows, "A second dwelling unit on a of the primary dwelling unit up to a )00 Planning Commission hearing, the The Commissions' concern was that drivers and sometimes taking up two The Commission directed staff to bring next series of Development Code compact parking spaces be reduced ~t. Staff feels this is a reasonable entirely, but at the same time, limit the an provide to meet the needs of larger tnce of Section 17.24.040 E to read total parking count may be sized for planters to be constructed in vehicle i planters adjacent to vehicle parking exiting their vehicles. In an attempt to ins exiting their vehicles, Staff is inch wide concrete courtesy curb on Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.24.0~50.H.6 to read, "All interior landscaped islands adjacent to vehicle parking spaces shall bej protected and enclosed in a 12 inch concrete curb no less than 6 inches in height " Proposed Clarification Amendments Temporary Signage-Confusion has arisen in the t section of the Development Code. Section 17.28.6( an attached promotional sign to one thirty (30) day quarter of the year when the signs are permitted for t were being submitted which requested one thirty (3 and one thirty (30) day period at the beginning o temporary promotional sign with a duration of 6~ Development Code. Due to difficulty administering t requested an interpretation of this provision frc interpretation specified that a quarter is a 90 day peri posted for 30 days and must be removed for 60 con general acceptance with the business community. Development Code to provide clarity to the existing iministration of the temporary signage I.C.i.e limits the maximum duration of eriod per quarter except in the fourth ~o thirty (30) day periods. Applications )day period at the end of the quarter the next quarter. The result was a days, which is in conflict with the is provision, the Building Technicians n the Planning Department. The d of time, during which, a sign maybe ecutive days. This policy has gained itaff is recommending amending the R:~DEVCODE101-0120 AmendmentWC Staff Report-8.1S01.doc 3 Staff's recommendation is to amend Section duration for attached promotional signs during through September) of the year is one thirty (30) sixty (60) day down period, during which time pn the fourth quarter (Octoberthrough December) p (30) day periods without observance of the sixiy Residential Densities-Section 17.06.020.E ar Code describes the Medium and High Density R indicate allowable densityforthe zones as found the public inquires about the density permitted General Plan. In an attempt to provide the pub information dissemination process, Staff is recon be amended to include residential zone target descriptions and the City's General Plan. .2i3.600.C.i.e to read, 'The maximum fe first through third quarters (January ry period per quarter, with a consecutive fotional signs are not permitted. During notional signs are permitted for two thirty 0) day down period." Section 17.06.020.E of the Development idential zones but these sections do not Sections 17.06.020.A through D. When i these zones staff must reference the with clear direction and to facilitate the lending that Sections 17.06.020.E and F consistent with, the other zone Staff's recommendation is to amend Section17.06.020.E to read, "Medium Density Residential (M). The medium density residential zoning district is intended to provide forthe development of attached and detached residential development. Typical housing types may include single-family, duplexes, triplexes, townhousies and patio homes, with a density range of 7 -12 dwelling units per acre. In addition, amend Section 17.06.020.E to read, "Nigh Density Residential (H). The high density residential zoning district is intended to provide for the development of attached residential development. Typical housing types may include townhouses, stacked dwellings and apartments, with a density range of 13 - 20 dwelling units per acre." Minimum Lot Area-The Citys General Plan and through D describes the minimum lot size in to describes minimum lot size in terms of gross ac Planning Director has made the determination consistent with the General Plan, therefore, net I minimum lot size. Staff is recommending that replaced with the word 'net' to alleviate further co General Plan. Amend the second row of Table 17.06.040 with the to read, "Minimum net lot area (acres)". Right-of-Way Planting-One aspect of project re provides the minimum required landscaped open minimum landscaped requirements that can be 17.08.040. Applicants are also required to plant ac or right-of-way. The policy has been established not included in the minimum required landscape Works Department can reclaim the right-of-way arf Code Sections 17.06.020.A ~s of net acres while Table 17.06.040 ~. Conflict has presented itself so the at the Development Code should be size should be used when addressing word 'gross' in Table 17.06.040 be ~sion and provide consistency with the 'Minimum gross lot area (acres)' sew is to determine whether the project space. The Development Code has Fund in Table 17.08.040A of Section scent areas that fall within an easement sat plantings within the right-of-way are open space area because the Public t for public use (i.e.: a road at any time). R:~DEVCODE~01-0120 AmendmentlPC Staff Report-8.75-01.doc Should the Public Works Department reclaim the area would be removed resulting in a deficiency owner to maintain at least the minimum landscap even if the right-of-way area is reclaimed the projec for landscaped open space planting. Staff is recor include this policy which in practice has gained ac uea it is probable that the landscaped f landscaping. Requiring the property d open space area onsite insures that will not fall below the code requirement mending that the Code be amended to :ptance in the community. Staff's recommendation is to amend Tables 17.08.040A and B of Section 17.08.040 to add superscript numeral 1 to the end of the heading to read," Minimum required landscaped open space'". Amend Tables 17.08.040.A and B of Section 17.0 note that reads,"1. Minimum required landscaped necessary planting within the street right-of-way." Commercial Building Offsets-Commercial and includes both large and small scale projects. The D scale development can produce buildings whose z walls. The Code addresses this concern in Section need to add offsets to break up long unarticulated provision be added to Section 17.08.070.0.2 in an s development with long unarticulated walls, which is Guidelines. to include a notes section with a space area does not include the ndustrial development within the City velopment Code recognizes that large chitecture includes Tong unarticulated 7.08.070.D.2.a, where it addresses the valls. Staff is recommending that this tempt to prevent "big box" commercial inconsistent with the Citywide Design Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.08.070.0.2 to include an item d which reads, "Long unarticulated walls should be avoided. Wall planes should not extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty (50) feet without pn offset or enhanced architectural articulation." I • Lot Coverage -The Development Code uses lot coverage as a development standard but there is no definition of lot coverage in Section 17.34100. Staff is recommending amending the Code to include a lot coverage definition. Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.34.010 to read, "'Lot coverage" means that portion of the lot that is covered by buildings and structures, which is derived as the quotient of the gross lot acreage divided by the area covered by the footprint(s) of the buildings or structures " I ENVIRf~NMtNTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this pi amendments would result in any environmental impacts beyc Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan. The C amendments would not result in impacts beyond those origir Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared for the origins Planning Commission recommends that the City Council m. impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the the General Plan and that no further environmental analysis oject to determine if the proposed nd those impacts identified in the Final hecklist indicated that the proposed ally anticipated for the City's General Development Code. As a result, the ike a determination that the potential Final Environmental Impact Reportfor is required. R:\DEVCODEIDI-0120 AmendmenllPC Staff Report•8-15-01.doc 5 GENERAL PLAN CONCLUSIONS The proposed amendments are determined to be cons General Plan Environmental Impact Report and the City's; was prepared and determined that the proposed amendm environment beyond those impacts identified in the Fin. General Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared fof FINDINGS 1. The proposed Development Code Amendments a welfare of the community. 2. The proposed Development Code Amendments community because they remain consistent with General Plan. Attachments: 1. PC Resolution -Blue Page 7 2. Exhibit A -Proposed Ordinance -Blue Page 10 istent with the City's General Plan, the ?oning Map. An Environmental Checklist :nts will not have an adverse effect on the al Environmental Impact Report for the the original Development Code. compatible with the health, safety and not have an adverse effect on the goals and policies of the adopted R:~DL-VCODEWI-0120 AmendmentlPC Staff Report-8-15.01.tloc 6 ATTACHMENT N0.4 LETTERS RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION R:~DEVCODE101-0120 Artentlment~stafl report pp2.tloc 1 r~ MDMG, Inc. Markham Development Management Group, Inc. August 15, 2001 City of Temecula Chairman Dennis Chiniaeff, Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92593-9033 Subject: PA 01-0120 De~ Agenda Item #5 Planning Comm Dear Chairman Chiniaeff, I would like to provide a written record of my item. My comments are as follows; • Non Protit Clubs, etc. -Good revision, L-1, L-2 • Political Signage -Good revision, but revise also 14 days • Second Dwelling Unit -Good revision, but instance • Compact Parking Spaces -Good revision, but spaces entirely. Additionally, "fifteen percent" o • Courtesy Curbs- Already being required?., as a end parking spaces be paved 1' foot wider, i.e. 1 planter areas are usually left uncompacted for ply out strips" are constructed after the curbs are co invariably crack and fail. • Temporary Signage -Good revision • Residential Densities -Needs better definition. density but is moot within the recommendation s appears to a "stealth" attempt to negate the desit currently in process and thus unacceptable. 41750 Winchester Road, Sui[e N • Temecula, California Code Amendments of 8-15-01 relative to the subject agenda recommend delete from VL, to 60", and why is 10 days not "livable space" in each ibly delete compact parking total Required parking alternate I would offer that the I feet but striped to 9 feet. The nting purposes and the 6" "step .strutted on uncompacted 511 and The discussion section targets ;coon. Additionally, this n of at least two projects (909) 296-3466 • Fax: (909) 296-3476 Minimum Lot Area -Bad concept. This was now it resurfaces. Project densities have been h Additionally, builder lot sizes are very definitely when parcels increase to 0.5 acres and larger, i.~ concept breaks down and it magnifies as the pai example, every existing 40 acre gross project w parcels, likewise 10 acre gross yields only 3 x 2 yields only 3 x 1.0+ acre net parcels, 2 acres grc parcels. This may not seem like a major issue to staff, bt a 25% or larger yield reduction and the slight in not yield little if any increase in lot value. ThesF homesites not as lot sizes. This change will alsi legal non-conforming parcel sizes in every large As a final note, and as an example, the City of Los Ranchitos (VL) and as a result of this ame yield 2 lots versus 3 under the existing code. at the last Code update, storically based on gross acreage. net of road right of ways, but . L-2, L-1, VL and HR this ;els become larger. As an Auld only yield 3 x 10+ acre net i+ acre net parcels, 4 acres gross ss into only 3 x 0.5+ acre net to a landowner it is. Potentially rease in remaining lot size does type of parcels are sold as create a flood of prior existing area of Temecula. la owns 7.72 acres gross in if subdivided would only Right of Way Planting -Discussion - "within an easement or right of way", concern about easement language, better definition -specifically the Winchester Road SH 79 25 foot transportation comdor eas~ment on both sides. Commercial Building Offsets - No Comment Lot Coverage -Questions, structures, does thi i include gazebos, patio covers, decks, etc. -Not clear Based on these comments, and the demise of the City of Temecula Coordinating Committee, I would request a continuance to 9-5-01 to address you in person. Management Group, Inc. cc: R. Guerriero, Planning Commissioner D. Mathewson, Planning Commissioner M.J. Olhasso, Planning Commissioner J. Telesio, Planning Commissioner Sincerely, Tp: Temecula Planning Commission RE: Elks Club Zoning Variance on Calle Chapos We have lived at 39910 Calle Girasol in Temecula for engagement, we aze unable to attend the Planning Com that will address the zoning change request by the Elks change in our developing neighborhood, one that provi for the City. r ten years. Due to a previous sion meeting on August 15`n ib. We oppose this zoning some of the last rural chazacter While the Elks are a fine community organization, their'plan to build a lodge in the middle of a residential area is totally incompatible with the zoning for the area. The objective of our General Plan and Planning Commissions is to prevent such misdirection by organizations that aze working solely on their own agenda. The zoning in our neighborhood is for very low density residential. This is very cleazly defined in our General Plan: "...intended to provide for the development of sir, homes on large lots with rural ranchette chazacter designation is also consistent with lagge lot reside: other animals, or utilize a portion of the land for a Th Elks request is totally incongruent with this definition should be in a more commercially-oriented azea. If the E lodge, they should have secured such zoning prior to the simply did not do their homework and should not be gray will discourage future home construction in this azea and inconsistent with any reasonable planning guidelines. family detached development. This ;s that keep horses and cultural production." . This type of development ks Club intended to build a purchase of any land. They ted a variance. Such a variance lead to a mixed-use area that is Our final question to the Elks organization and Planning Commission members is this: Would you want a lodge in the middle of your residentia azea? Our answer to that question is no, we do not. Please help our neighborhood develop into a quality variance that would be so incompatible with our life Dennis Fitz Harriet Hiding ential azea and not allow a in this neighborhood. ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAM CITY MANAGER _ CITY OF TEMEC AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/Cit~ C~o ncil FROM: Debbie Ubnoskd?~Director of Plann DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Rancho Highlands Drive General PA99-0451) Amendment (Planning Application PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION David Hogan, Senior Planner The Planning Commission ADOPTa BACKGROUND: A RESOLUTION OF THE CI OF TEMECULA DENYING ' GENERAL PLAN LAND US ON RANCHO HIGHLAND; ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NC APPLICATION NO. 99-0451) The purpose of this City initiated amendment was to corr the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and the General PIS Amendment, if approved, would change the designation Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. This "clean-up" to most of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 23624. Staff had prey space designation on this site was incorrect. This initial a review of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. that the City Council: entitled: 'COUNCIL OF THE CITY E AMENDMENT OF THE MAP FOR A LOCATION DRIVE, IDENTIFIED AS 944-330-019 (PLANNING t a mapping inconsistency between Land Use Map. The General Plan ~ 1.4 acres of property from Open Feral Plan Amendment would apply usly identified that we felt the open ~ssment was further supported by a The following information from the Specific Plan supported the concept that the open space designation had been incorrectly applied to this site. 1. The Land Use diagram, Figure 6 of the Specific Plan, was prepared in a "bubble" style and is intended to show only a general location for the land use areas; not to provide a precise Planning Area boundary. 2. The Open Space/Major Slope diagram, Figure 12, ii be a manufactured slope between Planning Areas 1 acceptable as open space areas. tes that a portion of this site will 6. Manufactured slopes are not A:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc 3. The conceptual Grading Plan, Figure 13, contains) a listing for "Natural Open Space"; however, no natural open space areas are actually identified on Figure 13. (The remaining natural open space areas were removed when the Specific Plan was amended in 1988.) 4. The site consists of Parcel 2 of approved Tentative Parcel Map 23624. This site was not designated as an open space lot in 1989 when the map was approved. (Parcel 1 is occupied by the Embassy Suites Hotel and Parce~ 3 is occupied by Marie Calendars Restaurant.) 5. The subject site has been paying a commercial DISCUSSION: This item was presented to the Planning Commission at the 1999 meetings. The Planning Commission staff report contained in Attachment No. 3. At the December presentation, the Commission unanimously denied the req inconsistency with the Specific Plan stating concerns abou increasing developable area, associated traffic impacts witt Specific Plan Amendment to require the development of such as a Park-N-Ride or a pedestrian bridge over I-15. F minutes are contained in Attachment No. 4. This item was previously considered at the December 1 Council meetings where it was continued off-calendar. At been brought back to the City Council for reconsideratic December 14'" and October 24'" meetings are contained draft Initial Environmental Study and selected pages from are contained in Attachment Nos. 6 and 7, respectively. SUMMARY The Planning Commission i. to change the General Plan Commercial. ATTACHMENT: recommending that the City Land Use Map designation f 1. Resolution No. 01-_ -Blue Page 4 2. Exhibits -Blue Page 7 A. Location Map B Existing General Plan Map 3. December 8, 1999, Planning Commission Staff Rep 4. December 8, 1999, Planning Commission Minutes- 5. December 14, 1999 and October 24, 2000 City Cow 6. Initial Environmental Study -Blue Page 14 7. Pages from the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan - B levied by CFD 88-12. it August 18, 1999 and December 8, from the December 8`h hearing is S, 1999 meeting, following staff's lest due to the proposal's perceived reducing Open Space acreage and the amendment, and the need for a ~n alternative transportation system copy of the Planning Commission's 1999 and October 24, 2000 City Applicant's request, this item has Copies of the minutes from the Attachment No. 5. A copy of the e Rancho Highlands Specific Plan ncil deny the applicant's request Open Space to Highway Tourist Blue Page 11 ie Page 12 Minutes-Blue Page 13 ue Page 15 R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO.01- R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO.01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUP TEMECULA DENYING THE AMI GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP F RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944 APPLICATION NO. 99-0451) WHEREAS, the City of Temecula initiated accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 99-0451 to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered December 8, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as pre: staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of F - OF THE CITY OF IMENT OF THE A LOCATION ON IDENTIFIED AS h019 (PLANNING Application No. 99-0451, in \ent Code; processed including, but not limited and local law; posted at City Hall, Temecula ley Chamber of Commerce; and, rg Application No. 99-0451 on by law, at which time the City either in support or opposition and after due consideration of Application No. 99-0451; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. 99-0451 on December 14, 1999, October 24, 2000, and September 25, 2001 at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and by reference. Section 2. Findings The City Council, in der (General Plan Amendment) hereby makes the following CITY OF TEMECULA DOES and are hereby incorporated Planning Application No. 99-0451 A. The proposed amendment to the General PI'an Land Use Map is not compatible with existing and surrounding uses, as the site was originally intended to provide an open space buffer between a commercial and residential area. B. The amendment would adversely effect amount of developable commercial pr approved as part of the Rancho Highla developable area would adversely impact Rancho California and Ynez Roads. the community by increasing the rty beyond what was originally Specific Plan. The increase in congested intersection at R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451 PA99 CC3b.dx C. The amendment is incompatible with the) health, safety and welfare of the community be its interjection of additional commercial uses in conflict with the goals and policies contained in the General f51an. Section 3. Denial of Planning Application 99-4451 Based upon the information provided, the recommendation of the Planning Commissio ~ ,the public testimony, and a review of all pertinent information presented to the Planning Commission and City Council, the City Council hereby denies Planning Application 99-0451. Section 4. Severabitity The City Council hereby) declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shalt not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adopti i n of this Resolution. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of September 2001. ATTEST: Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of foregoing Resolution No. 01-_ was duly and regularly Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: :cula, do hereby certify that the d by the City Council of the City of of , 2001 Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc 5 ATTACHMENT N0.2 EXHIBITS R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP R:\G P A\PA99-0457\451PA99 CC3b.doc chnE~`oF 9~ EXHIBIT - A LOCATION MAP CASE NUMBER: 99-0451 CITY COUNCIL DATE -SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 A~PA$p .999~GC3.doo -' ~ 9-- -r.s _w CITh'OF TEMECULA ~ ---- - ~~ ' - r ~ / ~ CC . C • . • ~ K • S 1 ~ Q . Q OS . F { ~ ~ S TC • ~ ., ~_ __ _ ._ __ ___ r __ _ _ EXHIBIT B -CURRENT GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESI CASE NUMBER: 99-0451 NATION CITY COUNCIL DATE -SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451 PA99 CC3.doc 10 "' _, =' ~. - _ _ _ ATTACHMENT NO.3 DECEMBER 8, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION STAF REPORT A:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc 10 STAFF REPORT - CITY OF PLANNING RECOMMENDATION: December 8, 1999 Planning Application No. P. (General Plan Amendn Prepared By: David Hogan, The Planning Department Commission: 1 2. O~/A v'~j~ /~` Planner recommends the Planning APPROVE a Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA99-0451; and, ADOPT Resolution No. 99- recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0451 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: GENERAL PLAN City of Temecula To amend the General Plan Land Use Map to change the Land Use Designation for a Portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan from Open Space to HighwayTourist Commercial. Between Rancho Highlands Drive and Interstate 15 (also identified as Assessors Parcel Number944-330-019) Specific Plan (SP-2) North: Specific Plan East: Specific Plan South: Specific Plan West: Specific Plan DESIGNATIONS: Open Space EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Highway Tour East: Vacant South: Vacant West: Interstate 15 PROJECT AREA 1.4 acres t Commercial \\TEMEC_FS701 \VOL1 \DeptsIPLANNING\STAFFRPT4151 PA99 - PC.doc 1 - . ~.... - BACKGROUND This item was initially presented to the Planning Commis At that time, the Commission continued this General Plan an opportunity to gather additional information. The pur mapping discontinuity between the Rancho Highlands Spei Map. The General Plan Amendment, if approved, would property from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commerci -Based upon staff's review of the Specific Plan, staff believes to be open space when the Specific Plan was adopted in ' originally been envisioned to contain manufactured land: supposed to provide a transition area between two adjacent a transition area was eliminated when the site was graded 1990s. i at their August 18, 1999 meeting. endment off calendar to provide staff of this amendment is to correct a Plan and the General Plan Land Use nge the designation on 1.4 acres of the area in question was intended . Staff believes that the site had ed slopes. These slopes were fining Areas. Much of the need for used as a borrow site in the early To further assist the Commission in their deliberations, staff has re-reviewed various sections of the Specific Plan and assembled the following information bout this area and the "open space" areas within the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. Section III.A.2.d on page 16: The Open Space/Recrr amendments to the Specific Plan would reduce the within the project from 60.6 to 34.3 acres. The chant non-usable slope areas toward more active recreatioi no park or recreation facilities shown on the plan. Thr occurred when the exact location of the Wildomar Fa a portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and ation discussion states that the 1988 amount of open space/major slopes e represented a shift from away from sites. The original Specific Plan had need to amend the Specific Plan had ift was identified. Its discovery made The key fact here is that major slope areas were cortisidered to be open space within the Plan. The definition of open space used in the Specific Plan is very different from the definition commonly in use by the City of Temecula. The City Planning Department does not consider manufactured slopes to be open space since none of the underlying plant and animal resources remain after the grading and landscaping processes are completed. 2. Section III.A.7 Open Space and Recreation Plan on { issues are discussed in more detail in Section 7. Thl and Recreation Plan includes natural open space (paragraph 1 on page 26). There is another referen~ talks about the acreage of "open space/major slope: of this section discusses the proposed recreation facil Open Space/Manufactured Slope" areas within the General Plan Land Use Map change is shown Space/Manufactured Slope. 3. Figure 13: The conceptual Grading Plan for the R provides information about future open space areas wi for the conceptual grading exhibit contains a listing f exhibit is examined, no natural open space areas are s natural open space is shown on the legend and not exhibit, staff believes that the open space areas in the when the Specific Plan was amended in 1988. The on did contain some natural open space areas. ages 26 through 28: The open space section states that the Open Space two lakes, and recreation centers to open space in Paragraph 3 that within the project. Most of the rest ies. Figure 12 shows all the "Natural project. The area of the proposed .n Figure 12 as a Natural Open cho Highlands Specific Plan also in the Plan. Specifically, the legend "Natural Open Space". When the wally shown on this Plan. Because entified on the conceptual grading iginal Specific Plan were eliminated fiat Rancho Highlands Specific Ptan \\TEMEC FS101\VOL1\Depls\PLANNINGISTAFFRPTW51PA99-PC.doc 2 4. Finally, Figure 6, the Land Use Plan, has been prep to show only the general development area for eaG staff believes that the "open space" area in questi< area between Planning Area 2 (commercial) residential/commercial). This interpretation is fun approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23624 in 1989. AI Planning Area 2, was subdivided into three comms contained an identification that an undevelopable o~ other two lots of Parcel Map 23624 already contain uses. In conclusion, staff believes that the open space areas wit were never intended to be open space as we currently Specific Plan, when taken as a whole, indicates that th represent landscaped transitional areas between the differs staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the General Plan. A copy of these various pages from the Attachment No. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION .An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project would result in any environmental impacts or any impacts Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The proposed General Plan Amendments would not result in imps for the City General Plan. As a result, these potential increa; staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be adopted. FINDINGS To recommend approval of the General Plan Amendment, the following findings: The amendment is compatible with the 2. The amendment is compatible with existing 3. Attachments: Ired in a "bubble° st~Ae and is intended particular Planning Area. As a result, n, was intended to depict a transition nd Planning Area 6 (high density ter supported by Riverside County's that time, a single parcel representing ~cial sites. None of the three parcels en space lot was being created. The Hiahwav Tourist oriented commercial n the Rancho Highland Specific Plan derstand it. The information in the e areas were originally intended to land use planning areas. As a result, e proposed clean-up amendment to 3ncho Highlands Specific Plan are in determine if the proposed changes :yond those identified in the Final itial Study indicated that overall, the s beyond those originally anticipated s are not considered significant and Planning Commission must make safety and welfare of the community. surrounding uses. The amendment will not have an adverse) effect on the community and are consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. 1. PC Resolution No. 99-_ -Blue Page 4 Exhibit A -Resolution No. 99-_ -Blue Page 7 2. Initial Environmental Study -Blue Page 11 3. Selected pages from the Rancho Highlands Specific 4. Exhibits -Blue Page 13 A. Location Map B Existing General Plan Map F:~DeplsIPLANNINGISTAFFRPTkl51 PA99 - PC.doc -Blue Page 12 ~ ~*;. ATTACHMENT NO. DECEMBER 8, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION M R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc 11 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C THE CITY OF TEMECULA A PPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL A LIGATION NO. PA99-0243 FOR TEI NO. 86 FOR THE SUBDIVISION 1 INTO 38 IDENTIAL LOTS LOCATEI SIDE OF M ARITA ROAD AT THE ~ LIMIT AND OWN AS ASSESS NUMBER 911-640- 3. Add- • A Condition subjecting the project to Commission. • A Condition requiring the app' nt to submit the Planning Commission be subject to Pr the applicant's recomm dation. The motion was seconded y Commissioner Web: unanimous approval. • EN11Camm/TlnuW/l'10•G- )MMISSION OF :COMMENDING OF PLANNING TATIVE TRAC F 9.75 AC S ON THE ST )RTHE CITY the Airport Land Use Guidelines for review by eview, per staffs and and voic'.s. vote reflected The applicant provide ssurance that this project would deflect sure quality; an elayed a preference that th project be subject to Product Review rather than Design Gui 'nes Review. Commissio r Webster Garified that the project had been conditioned to either be subject esign Guidelines Review, or Product Review, ~~Specifying the latitude. 7. PA99-04511 Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation for a portion of the Rancho Highl: Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. RECOMMENDATION k is recommended by the Planning Commission approve the request. Relaying that this proposal, if approved, would be tl Amendment for the year of 1999, Senior Planner Hogai staff report (of record); referenced sections of the Sped with respect to the Grading Plan, and the Open Sps additional information regarding the incorrect denoted ai with respect to Commission querying, relayed that while 6 to change the Land Use Speck Plan from Open that the Planning e fourth Land Use Element provided an overview of the c Plan (per agenda material) :e/Recreation area; provided 'eage in the Planning Areas; tall was of the opinion that a Specific Plan Amendment was not necessary, that 'rf it was the Commission's desire, that the matter could be brought back to the Commission at is later date; and with respell to the proposed CIP Project to construct a pedestrian bridge over the Interstate, noted that the specific location of that project had not been deterni~ed. Y Commissioner Webster queried the lack of provisio respell to the requirement to implement a Park ai requirement to have a Transportation Systems establishment of a coordinator (in Planning Area No. Area No. 2, recommended that there be a Specific revisions in this particular area. In response to Commissioner Fahey's comments regarc and Ride facility, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that the was that there be consideration of alternative transpor and Ride facility would be one option; speed that spe~dty, noting that the proposed pedestrian bridge particular requirement. in this particular proposal with Ride fadlity, as well as, the lanagement Team and the and wffh respect to Planning n Amendment to address the ig the implementation of a Park riginal intent of the requirement bon details, noting that a Park ie language was vague as to could qualify as meeting this Commissioner Fahey relayed that since there had been no implementation of any alternative transportation plan, that 'rf this particular sits was not maintained as Open Space, this site would be the sole area available for meeting that uiteria. Chairman Guerriero relayed concurrence with While concuring with staffs recommendation that Commissioner Webster relayed that with respell tc Grading Plan, this proposal was Dearly identified as an the intent for provision of a buffer within this area betwe and the Office Professional, and between the freeway which this area satisfied; relayed concern with exce Planning Area No. 2, in conjunction with the lack c transportation element; reiterated the recommendation f and relayed that he was not in favor of this proposal. Fahey's comments. revisions were necessitated, the Land Use Plan and the open Space/Slope area; noted n the High Density Residential and the development on site, ding the development within f provision for an attemative .r a Specific Plan Amendment; MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to dose the pudic hearing; and to deny staffs recommendation due to the following: 1) the proposal's nonconformance with the Specific Plan, and 2) the plan to develop additional acreage, rather than maintain an Open Space area, noting the assodated negative impact with respell to traffic. Chairman Gueriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. It was noted that at 6:58 P.M. the meeting recessed, recowening at 7:09 P.M. At this time the Commission considered Agenda Item No. 5. ATTACHMENT NO. CITY COUNCIL M R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc 12 Tem Comerchero relayed the difficulties Mayor Stone noted that a preliminary designing of the paAicular project had been comp d.t~rough the grentingplo with receiving grant Project, that M TION: Councilman Naggar moved to ap Recommendation. Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero seconded the motion an cs vote reflecte val with the exception of Councilman Pratt who voted At 7:15 P.M. ity Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Co ity Services Distri the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 7:35 P.M., The City Council res with PUBLIC HEARINGS 15 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve a Negative DeGaration for Planning Application PA9&0451; 15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION N0.9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 944330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-045,1) Due to the issues that had been raised at the Planning Commission meeting regarding this particular General Plan Amendment, Deputy City Manager Thornhill recommended tttat the matter be continued off calendar in order for staff to address those issues. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero moved to continuethis Agenda Item off calendar. Councilman Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDA' 16.1 Deny the appeal and uphol Application No. PA9 - 16.2 9de resolution entitled: Commission of Planning R.VAim,IS1171~YY 0 dson's comments, Mr. Stone reiterated that multi-family developments create less traffic than sing amily dwelling units. In closing, Mr. Stone stated that he would view the proposed cY as ' a visiona roject for the City. Noting that a City Heil decision was made with regard toy this project at t ctober 10, 2000, City Council meeting, Gilman Pratt stated that the City Attorney h repared the appropriate resolution for denial and the Council should vote on it. At this time, Mayor Stone requested th roll call vote continue the matter to the November 14, 2 City~2tS AYES: Comerchero, NOES: Naggar ABSENT: At 9:01 P.' ., ayor Stone called a short recess and recon\ P.M. 16 P.M, the City Council convened as the Comm RECOMMENDATION: ' 8.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration for Planning 8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC TEMECULA APPROVING THE AME GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FO RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE FROM HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-3. APPLICATION N0. PA99.0451) Planning Director Ubnoske presented the staff report (of rec advising that staff would view the proposed recommendatioi the General Plan Land Use Map and, therefore, it is being n designation of the 1.4 acres from open space to highway toi the Planning Commission had denied the request, voicing a increase developable area and, thereby, as well could poter exhibit, Planning Director Ubnoske relayed that the County'; boundaries for the planning areas. While the area of discus space/manufactured slope, she noted that it would be staffs boundaries were established with the intent of being refined City and stated that it would be staffs opinion that the site w manufactured slopes which would have provided a buffer be Referencing the conceptual grading plan, Planning Director discussion has been listed as natural open space but noted iken on the previously made motion to meeting. the City Council m ~ng at 9:15 Services District and the No. PA99-0451; OF THE CITY OF ~MENT OF THE A LOCATION ON PEN SPACE TO IDENTIFIED AS t119 (PLANNING Ord), reviewing the application, i as a clean-up or mapping error on commended to change the rist commercial. She advised that mcerns that the amendment would tially increase traffic. By way of an Specific Plan identifies general lion is designated as open opinion that these general once projects were submitted to the as originally envisioned to contain tween two the planning areas. Jbnoske advised that the area of :hat there are actually no areas of R:\Minutes1102400 11 natural open space on the exhibit. She stated that, in staffs opinion, the open space areas were eliminated when the Specific Plan was amended in 1988. Subsequent to the Planning ' Commission meeting, Ms. Ubnoske advised that the City Attorney had received information indicating that on an approved map the site of discussion is reflected as a commercial parcel and that a commercial assessment has been levied on the property of discussion by way of CFD 88-12. For Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero, Planning Director has been paying a commercial assessment. With the property owner paying a commercial assessment, this would be one in a number of factors indicating that the treated as commercial property and because the Specific F and bounds descriptions of open space/manufactured slop to review all the various factors with respect to the Tentativ In response to Councilman Naggar, Planning Director Ubn the site of discussion has been received by staff; that staff representatives regarding the construction of a hotel; that ; previously determined the mapping error but had not prese until an application had been presented to staff; and that tt and ride requirement but that staff will work with the applic To his understanding, Councilman Naggar noted that Plal separate lots (Marie Callendars, hotel, and open space). requires the construction of a park and ride, Councilman I ' staffs intent to construct the park and ride. For Councilm clarified that the requested amendment would not elimina park and ride; advised that the park and ride requirement and 2 and, therefore, it may be constructed in either Plani may not be constructed on property designated as open s currently has one park and ride by Carl's Jr. (Winchester are planned -one at the mall, one on SR79, and another In light of the potential of a Freeway Flyer, Councilman Ri ride at the site of discussion and stated that the area has City Attorney Thorson, for Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero, Plan amendment will not waive the Specific Plan requirE At this time, Mayor Stone opened the public hearing. reiterated that the property owner City Attorney Thorson advised that property in question has been Ian does not reflect precise meets os/commercial, it would be necessary Maps. ke advised that an application for is been talking wish the off, after some research, had ed it to the City Council for action applicant was unaware of the park ing Area 2 was divided into three ;cause the Specific Plan as well ggar questioned where ii would be Naggar, Planning Director Ubnoske the Specific Plan requirement for a is placed on both Planning Area I ~g Area; stated that a park and ride ice; and clarified that the City gad) and that three additional sites the site of discussion. :rts spoke in support of the park and use as open space. med that the proposed General to construct a park and ride. Ms. May Lorah, 35555 Monte De Oro, representing Citizens First for Temecula Valley, relayed her opposition to the proposed amendment and stated thatunder the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the amendment must be evaluated for environmental impacts and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report should be completed. Mr. Bill Johnson, 29400 Rancho Califomia Road, primary F Highlands Plan, noted that the open space designation alo ' the Specific Plan as well as the General Plan; that the site opportunity to create a desirable entrance development to Califomia Road; and that in light of this property being the City, he recommended that careful attention be given to th operty owner of the Rancho g the freeway is an important part of if discussion would give the City the ~e City of Temecula, along Rancho ast remaining entry property to the site. R:\Minutes\1024Q0 12 There being no additional input, the public hearing was closed by Mayor Stone. ' If a General Plan amendment were necessary to ensure the development of a park and ride on the site of discussion, Councilman Naggar, echoed by Couricilman Pratt, relayed his support of the request. If the amendment were not necessary for the park and ride, Mr. Naggar relayed his opposition to the amendment. Mayor Stone as well relayed his support for a park and City Attorney Thorson noted that the City Council must d should be designated as highway commercial or open sF were determined, a resolution would need to be adopted determined to leave the designation at highway commer~ Council should be adopted. Mr. Thorson noted that the I a separate issue and reiterated that the park and ride, to constructed on Planning Area 1 (of record) 2. fe whether the site of discussion ~. If the open space designation the City Council. If it were then the resolution before the City and ride issue should be treated as understanding, may be either Since there is no urgency with regard to this matter, Mayor tone suggested to continue the matter and discuss the feasibility of constructing a park and ride in the area of discussion and if not there, staff to determine other possible alternatives. MOTION: Mayor Stone moved to continue this matter off calendar and to renotice the issue when it is reagendized. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. MENDATION: 9.1 Rece~ the Subcommittee's verbal report and Having met with the licant, Mayor Pro Tem Comers Naggar and he served o he subcommittee which is re project with approximately residential units and the At this time, Mayor Stone opened thepublic hearing. Mr. Marasco, 12625 High Bluff Drive, San Did County had imposed an assessment on the City zoning which, in turn, imposes a ce n e a downzoning, which now makes the sessn therefore, it is being requested to prove the For Mayor Stone, Mr, be a viable solution; t action; and, therefor ~ advised that the subcorc nsizing the property would further exacerbate the prol Mr. Charles hristensen, 444 West C Street, San Dig that his le r of October 27, 2000, be incorporated into acres a been taxed as commercial property from thr tha n economically viable solution must be approved; proval of the request. R:1Minutes1102400 13 the approprjafe direction. dtffat Councilman g the development of a be commercial. t of the project, advised that the thereby, making an assumption of for on the property; that there was ,tent with the zoning; and that, ~Q the zoning map. ation would not the County's Old Vail Partners, r ues record; stated that thes re District No.159 was forr I that he would encourage ATTACHMENT NO. INTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC3b.doc 13 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Ch~ cklist Project Title .Planning Application P A99-0451 -Rancho Highlands Drive General Plan Land Use Map A mendment Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589; 9033 Contact Person and Phone Number David Hogan, Senior P lanner (909) 694-6400 Project Location West of Rancho Highla nds Drive, immediately east of Interstate 15 in the City of Temecula. Project Sponsors Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589- 9033 General Plan Designation Open Space Zoning Specific Plan (SP-2) Description of Project Amend the General Pla n Land Use Map for a portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Pl an from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial to correct a mapping error from the earlier adoption of the General Plan. The underlying Speci fic Plan land use and site development requirements are not b eing changed by this amendment. Any future development of the sited will comply with the appropriate development and environmental reviY w requirements. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The site is located in th' e Rancho Highlands Specific Plan in an area identffied for urban sca i development The can-ent adjacent land uses are as folhws: North: Commercia l (the Embassy Suites Hotel) East: Vacant South: Vacant __ _ _._ .:.____. ...- ..._ West: Interstate 1 5 Other public agencies whose approval None. is required I F:~DeptsW LANNING~CEOAV751 PA99 IES.Ooe 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use Plannin Hazards Po ulation and Housin Noise Geolo is Problems Public Services Water Utilities and Service S stems Air Quali Aesthetics Trans rtation/Ciroulation Cultural Resources l3iolo ical Resources Recreation Ene and Mineral Resources Mandato Findin s of Si n~cance Nohe Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that although the proposed project could have a signifcant effect on the environment, there will not be a sign~canYeffect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the ro'ect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially sign fficant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated° impact on the environment, but at least on e effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, end 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on atta ched sheets, if the effect is a "potentially sign cant impact" or "potentially sign cant unless mitigated l" An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re wired but it must anal ze onl the effects that remain tb be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a signific ant effect or, the environment, because all potentially sign cant effects (a) have been analyzed adequa tely in an ear~ar EIR or NEGATIVE DECtJiRATION,pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) ha ve been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including rev isions or mitigation measures that are im osed u on the ro osed ro'ed, nothin further is re wir ed. Signature Printed name F:1Dep1s1PLANNING~CE~AM57 PA99 IES.EOc 1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: a. b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (inducting, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? (11 c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan dr / natural community conservation plan? (21 Comments: 1. The proposal is intended to correct a mapping error that oc The site was inadvertently designated as open space whet Space on the General Plan was, in Rancho Highlands Spey that were intended to represent a transition area between Rancho Highlands Spetitic Plan did not identify any enviror project will not conflict with the applicable environmental ~ jurisdiction over the project The project will not divide an a commando? area between Rancho Highlands Drive and Ir on or near the site to be divided by this proposal. Then community conservation plans applicable to the site. Then proposed project. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a. Intluce substantal population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension med during the original General Plan process. it was part of Planning Area No. 2. The Open fic Plan, manufactured and landscaped slopes ,rture commertial and residential areas. The rental resources that would be protected. The ans or polities adopted by the agencies with stablished community. The site is located in :rstate 15. There is no established community are also no habitat conservation or natural 'ore, no significant impacts will result from the b. Dispisce substantial numbers of existing housing, / necessitzting the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 3 c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacementhousing elsewhere? (31 Comments: 3. The project will not induce new population growth within the structures or area residents. The project is the correction of a approved spetific plan. As a result, no displacement impacts r and will not displace existing residential ping error for a commertial zone within an associated with this proposal. F:~DeptaIPLANNINGICE0A1451 PA99 IES.tlx 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? a. I Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, inGuding the risk of loss, injury, or death q rcupture or a Known eartnquaKe mutt, as tlerneatetl on / the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Sbecial Publication 42. b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? ./ c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B of the. Un'rfonn Building Code (1994), creating substantial e. I leave soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems .where sewers are not available for the disposal of Comments: 3. The project is a General Plan Land Use Map correction and substantial adverse effects. Any specific development props review when the detailed project is ready for consideration. hazards near the project area. The General Plan EIR also will be applied when development occurs. These measurE various seismiarelated hazards. The project (a General PI for soil subsidence and slope instability. In addition, no or result, no sign cant effects are anticipated as a result of th 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. ~ Violate any water quality standards or II not expose people or structures to potential 31s will receive the appropriate environmental ie General Plan ident~es signficant seismic entifies numerous mitigation measures that have the ability to reduce the impacts from Land Use Map correction) has no potential to waste disposal is being proposed. As a project. b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or blanned uses for F:~De{AeWUNNINGICE~AV151PA9D IES.doe lJ which ermits have been ranted ? 2 c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the Bile or area, induding through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? 3 d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the si te or area, induding through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amou nt of surface runoff in a manner which would result in floodin g on- or off-site? 3 e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed th e capadty of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of olluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantiall d rade water uali ? g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area a s mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Floo d Insurance Rate Map or other food hazard delineation map ? 4 h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would im ede or redirect flood flows? 4 i. F_xpose people or structures to a sign cant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (4) j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? (2,4) Comments: 4. The proposed amendment will not aker or impact physical areas where flood hazards have been ident~ed within the Cit)rs boundaries and will not effect water quantity or quality. As a result, no significant impact have been ident~ed. 5. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance crii management or air pollution control district may determinations. Would the project: a. ~ Conflict with or obstruct established by the applicable quality relied upon to make the following b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ~/ to an existin or ro acted air uali violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed uantitative thresholds for ozone recursors? d. 6cpose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant wncentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of oeoole? f2) f:~Dep1a1P UNNINGICEOAM57 PA99 IES.doe 5 Comments: 5. The proposed amendment, a mapping error correction to 1 effect air quality. As a result,'no significant impacts have General Plan Land Use Map, will not aker or en identified. 6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: _. ~ 4 # > ~: > s # # n,~y>u > Fs~S i~ €'Y ii W ~. i # s : # : i >;' i>~S#i'S#FF,1W~3> E ~'~YF Y#IiF F i ~F~u, 5 E5 #~ r mF b ff £ ~ 3~ ~' F' -: ~ Potential Pdentlally Sigrdrwpttl Unle~_s -.len'[Itav2E: 7 .. tt--5 Z~ i 5 s y i F : 3 .... ( . .. . ~ $~ICYII~ ~U~~! . : b~ ...<..:. a. ........ ~..... .. $ nrORIW~rG{$Q{ItE88i :_: .,. ~ k. ..~, .' i ..: . .. 8E8d F .. ..: ... a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing Vaffic load and capacity of the sVeet system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehiGe trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads or con estion at intersections? 2 b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively; a level of service standard established by the county congestion mono ement a en for desi Hated roads or hi hwa s7 c. Result in a change in air Vaffic patterns, inGuding either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safe risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incom atible uses e.. farm a ui ment ? e. Result in inade uate erne en access? f. Result in inade uate arkin ca aci g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative Vansportation (e.g.; bus turnouts, bi cle racks? 1 Comments: 6. Any potential impacts associated with this project have been addressed through the EIR for the citywide General Plan that evaluated the cumulative Vaffic impacts of all development in the City. In addition, the EIR for the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan also discussed the impacts of the entire Specific Plan area (inGuding this site). As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat mod cations, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildl'rfe Service? f21 v. nave a suosuanuai aaverse enect on any npanan habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and F:1Depb1PLANNINGVCE0AU51PA9fa IES.tioc • I t c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Wate Ad (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological intenuption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife conidor s, or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? 2 3 e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources such as a tree preservation policy f or ' , orctinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Comments: 7 The site has already been graded and disturbed and contains no identifiable biologic resources. Prior to the approval of any detailed development proposal, the potential impacts to on site biologic resources will be evaluated. As a result, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? 1,2 b. Result in the loss of availability of a locelly-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local eneral Ian, s ecific plan or other land use plan? Comments: 8. The project is a General Plan land Use Map correction an~will not impact mineral resources. In addition, no mineral resources have been identified on the site. As result, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project 9. HAZARDS. AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the a. I Create a sign~cent hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or crate a signficant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous F:1DeptsW LANNINGVCEOAM51 PA99 IES.doe c. F~nit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is inGuded on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would ft create a sign cant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, NA where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or wortdn in the ro ell area? 1 f. For a project within the vidnity of a private airstrip, would NA the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workin in the ro ell area? 1 g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation Ian? h. Expose people or structures to a sign cant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, inGuding where wiidlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: 9.a-d. The proposed amendment, a mapping eror correction to th'e General Plan Land Use Map will not create a public hazard or resuR in a the discharge of hazardous material. The project is not located in a location that would block or interfere with an emergency response plan. As a result, no significant impacts have been ident~ed. 9.e,f The project is not logted within the Airport Influence Area of the French Valley Airport, the dosest airport to the project site. Therefore, no significant impacts are possible. 9.g,h The site is also not expelled to be affected by wildland fires. The site is located in an urban area, and Interstate 15 is between this site and the Gosest wildland fire area. As a result, no sign cant impacts have been identfiied. 10. NOISE. Would the project result in: a. I Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agendes? o. I txposure of persons to or generation of excessive I I I / groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? (1,2) c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project victnity above levels existing without the project? (1,2) f:lDepbIPUNNINGICE0AVI51PA9D IES.doc u d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro'ecY1 1,2 e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, NA where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would NA the project expose people residing or working in the ro'ed area to excessive noise levels? Comments: 10. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any noise impacts. Any future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. The project is not located within the Airport Influence Area of the French Valley Airport, the Gosest airport to the project site. As a result, no sign cant impacts have been identified. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: a. e. impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause sign cant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for anv of the oublic services? f1.2) Comments: 11 The project, a General Plan land Use Map mapping error wi'I not result in any impacts to public services. Any future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. As a resuk, no impacts have.been identified.. I 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a. hxceed wastewater Vestment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or ~ ~ wastewater Vestment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant F:~DeplsW LANNINGICEOAM51 PA991ES.dx ~~ environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause sign cant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing enUUements and resources, or are new or a ended entiUemeMS needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatmen t provider which serves or may serve the project that it ha , s s adequate capacity to serve the project's projected deman ll in addition to the rovider's existin commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity t o accommodate the ro'ect's solid waste dis osal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and re ulations related to solid waste? Comments: 12. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to public services. Any future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. As a result, no impacts have been ident~ed. 13. AESTHETICS. Would the project: o. .~uDStanuaily damage scenic resources, inGuding, but not ~ limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building within a state scenic hi hwa c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or uali of the site and its suroundin s? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the Comments: 13. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any direct aesthetic impacts. Any future development will need to comply with the Development Code and Design Guidelines that require site landscaping and higher quality architectural design. An future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. As a result, no impacts~have been identified. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Cause a substantial ad a historical resource as F:~Depb1PLANNINGVCE0A~451 PA99 IES.doc in the 10 b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the sign~cance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5? c.- Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or uni ue eolo is feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: 14. The project, a General Plan land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to cultural resources. Any future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. As a result, no impacts have been identified. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: E 1 1 >: ;t 5 $ > ZS ss5 > {~y Q~f x 3 ~S H _, i ikS E.F` F5S _ i i sus sE S~ >us f( ~~'$F, s~z : (;j$t ~k~ s 1£ s i t x ~ n : ~ >; t # } ~ ::,:~' i .~w ~ >5y / t .~,.,,~~,..SU S~. fss'~jFA3[ei(`SMRi~~#~. si~ >3kHI;~£~. $~ICill~ ~~IIyM~ ~inWl~! ~' ~ sF t S E i , J t F{yui FS 3 > "std : t2 jj'FS R : s i :t: k 3 .. ' ##. I t ' ; ~~ ' ~ i S f t' ? i A4tlpalionf: :<i z:t £ >f#d .. ; ,3. :. .: zs, ... .. ... .....<.>is. :vid: . .. Moirtwikn~Saurcesce.,..... :.< .....,: .....'.;. ~ , ,,;:: ;. ryd'.. .nn,:?. i rt: a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the fadli would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: 15. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to recreational faalities. Any future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. As a resuk, no impacts have been ident~ed. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade th? qual of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fi or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to dr below seH sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant animal community, reduce the number of restrict the rarn, of a rare or endangered plant or animal or elimin2 important examples of the major periods of Califon Does the project have impacts that are individually limite but wmulatively considerable9 ("Cumufatiw considerable' means that the incremental effects of project are considerable when viewed in connection w the effects of past projects, the effects of other cone projects, and the effects of probable future projects? F1Depb1PLANNINGICE0AM51 PASO IES.dx 11 • c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substartUal adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectlvT Comments: 16. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping statewide resources. not effect the environment or other important 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, p rogram EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative deGaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attach ed sheets. a. Earlier anal ses used. Ident' earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review. b. Impacts adequatey addressed. Identify which affects fro m the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document purs uant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed b mill ation meas ures based on the earlier anal sis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Sign ificant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporate d or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-s ec~c conditions f or the ro'ed. 17. This project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error, c for the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and the City Gene documents bepuse the City General Plan was developed addition, the City zoning map indicates that the project < proposal is consistent with all previous analyses. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental 3. Rancho Highlands Spec Plan and EIR. 4. FEMA Flood Map: Map No. 060742 0005 8. s not effect the previous analysis undertaken Plan. This proposal is consistent with both incorporate the approved Specific'Plan. In I is zoned Specific Plan. As a result, the Report. F:1DeptaW LANNINGICE~A1651 PA99 IE S.tloc 72 ATTACHMENT N0. PAGES FROM THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS SPECIFIC PLAN R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451 PA99 CC3b.doc 14 7. Open Space and Recreation a. Open Space and Recreation Plan The Open Space and Recreation P1. includes natural open space, two lake ters as shown on Figure 12. Open s~ buffering from the freeway and Ynez common open space has been minimized the change in product mixture from h: development to medium (2-5 du/ac', detached dwelling units. The Amendment now shows a 7.8 acre tion park site in the east/central noted in Section III.A.2., Land use will be used for more active partic uses than the open space which was p Speci-fic Plan. Some uses which recreation building, tennis cour swimming pool, children's play are addition, private recreation center very high density areas (Planning recreation center in Planning Area use by the residents of both Planni: recreation center is desired in Plan: recreation center in Planning Area accordingly. The County requirements relative amendment number 460.76 (which impl: the Quimby Act), will be sati: recreational land and activities ~ Amendment requires that three (3) ac 1,000 persons within the community k hood and community park and rec~ benefit of the residentis. Based on per dwelling unit, population for t 2,293 persons, which would require E land to satisfy proposed Ordinar recreation facilities/park site (7.E that requirement. In addition, recreational facilities will be prc density residential areas, .and. there space/major slopes.. The equestrian trail in the western p been eliminated. Since the conceptio Highlands Plan, the Rancho Californ state of land use transition from a more urbanized condition. Additional did not connect to a major regional ended in the northern reaches of the n for Rancho Highlands s, and recreation cen- ace continues to provide Road. However, internal to a large extent due to gher density clustered density single-family ommunity private recrea- portion of the site (as and Density). That site pation recreational land ovided on the approved may be provided are a s, volleyball courts, ball fields, etc. In will be provided in the yeas 3, 6, and 7). The 6 will be available for g Areas 4/5 and 6. If a ing Area 4/5, then the will be reduced in size > subdivision ordinance cents the provisions of 'ied by the proposed •oposed. This Ordinance •es of property for each dedicated to neighbor- ational purposes,. for n estimated 2.8 persons e project should total 5 acres of recreational e requirements. The acres) more than meets as noted, private ided.in the very high re 32.5 acres of open :rtion of the site has : of the original Rancho a area has been in a predominantly rural to a y, the equestrian trail system and essentially ite. In the approved 26 plan, the trail provided access to the natural open space ad- jacent to the freeway. Because that open space has been reduced in favor of usable park andrecreation area in the eastern portion of the site, the trail is no longer needed. b. Development Standards 1) The open space and recreation areas shown in Figure 12 shall be developed in accordance with the requirements and standards of the R-5 zone of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, and the Specifiic Plan on a minimum of 50 acres as follows: o A master property owner's association shall be es- tablished to operate and m~laintain all open space areas and recreation facilities. o, Vegetative stands shown in (Figure 12 shall be pre- served within open space areas and maintained in a viable growth condition. Natural springs, ponds, water courses, and seeps, shall be preserved within open space areas to the greatest extent possible. o Class I bike lanes, trails shall be c Figure 12. 2) o Equestrian trails crossin across identified roadway Master Homeowner's Associat o Class II bike lanes shall arterial and collector road Road and Rancho California Specific Plan site, and Street within the Specific Community recreation center and centers shall be developed in a "D", and shall include the follow o The sites shall be fully 1 trees, shrubs and ground cov ian trails and hiking d in accordance with shall be constructed and conveyed to the for maintenance. e constructed on all ys Ynez Road, Santiago ad, as they border the "A" Street and "H" an. ighborhood recreation ordance with Exhibit 4: with specimen o An automatic irrigation system shall be installed in a manner compatible with the natural character of the drainage course. o Maintenance of responsibility association. the recreation centers shall be the of the maser property owner's ,. 27 U_ LL Z ~+ N a ~~ I W N ~ ~ ~-. i'~.._.._.., Zp ~ ~ a Q J i ,,, ~! ` :;=-- .~ ;_ ~, I~. I;I ~~1; \~~ Il .`~ ~''~ ~ \. _, •, . . \. C'9 ~ ~~ ~. ~~:1\ •~IJ! I ~~~..4. ~a a ~. ~ ~~ ~~ . , ~ 6 ~E~~~~~?a~~~ ~ ~© ~, ~~~ ~e a ~ _• X y E B 6 3~ gaag a 8~ ~ a?s \ a Sa: ; c~ w O a Z O c~ W s o ~? a ~ ~ d °s °m a~a LL Z U ~ g ~ U a~ a' :~ --- ~ ~ ' ' 1 ~~ ~ i ~ ~~ -' 1 ~. ~ ~ ~ti~ i N ~ ;~~,AC ~ a. i i "i._ «, r z ~~ ~a fig, l N Q W Q _Z Z Q J a a O W 6 a W U ~a LL LL 0 O ui r z w f u~l ~ U W W O 2 U O N Z 2 H W - W W ~ F Z Z a J W y m N ; Z? m O e m^ i^ m ~ 2^ 2 5 o FZ e Z o =~ o N a N LL F '~ U 2 W • N e Z y- m y~ W ~? W a Q W in 1 1 7+ a S r ..~ r / ~~ o a A. z a ~ `u Z •~ w .o. .~ /~ ~ ~Pp ~,~.. •o 6. O~ ,, ?~ ' - %\ w Y /r J \" ~~~/.- (., `;~ G v In P .p ~/. \ (1/\~~ '~ O N Q O J =a x z ~, U W m Z N ~ f' o = W u U w Z Q m Q N 6 N i~h~: Il ~i f VIII ~~V Y .. N~a ~~. O ao i ~~ ~~~~ i y... ~{dN8 z y w C a .~ o S w .~ > 'S.~ G .N- ~_ m ~ Z ~ O O O1 _~ ? LL IS Z d, a P€f ~'~ ~tY 6tf --...... VJ V Q J a W ~ F L..y . en C Z z a Q CO °- ° m e LSO w IL C'3 ojf s a ~ , l s ~° a Z In N ~ ~ i ~ _ Z ~ W ° v1 o ~ ~ 'Z"' O Z O 2 0 O u. Z = ° _ ° i \ : fi ~ ejz 1 ~ ~ a w<~m ~;,,° °~~~ >e~~ mm~ _ >_ J, =.Q LLz J O ~ W ~ / 'I f7 W a .~I N Z x . _... J .... D W 3i:: i' iii ~''! :<kt£id f ~ Q i ~~//~~ U I ti`i:~'j m •, ~ ° ,~( 'r ;' ~jlu.~ o, nn ~r J y~ ° 1 .I'.. Ij~~~n~~~ ~ ((( f'' ~ ~ I i W LL 1 tt (((~~~ ~( '~. it t "' ~ O.p,;Q~. ~ ~.I! l i i ~ e I I ,~ ('~ _ w ~ ~I /. ;~,g~~, > ~~ . , ~~ I do , ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ ' ( i ~- ~,3 ~ i -. ~ o~~~ ~i ~ t' ~~~ ~ Z Q i `.- ~ ~ =r3, ~ ~ r ,r ~ ~~ f` i- ~~I ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ x z l 1 \\ '- -( P~ ~ o l Z ~ ~1i ~ ~ C~~~', i W ~ FyN .. «p, O = w ' @ei `~ ~ : }a' Q tq n e}_ oaf *~~ ~, . % z %" a .~, i; ~ a ~ U O I o° a a ~ o0 W V "' , ,; a w ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~'; I ~+ ~ ~4 jq.'~ j . I _ o~ <; ~ e ~, .- ,~~ ~' x. ~ Y ', z F~~? ~S E ( ryryµµ~~ x ~f L ~~~+ ,~ u _ y V ~w ) ~ r= ~, ~~ ~ ~_' d ?~ ~ ~ f ~~c', / a a F <x nom: 9 _ .' ~~' Y, Ch~ '`s' ?' ~ -, i o ° u 4 ~' ~ - L ^oo q~ ,. ~ ~ e J ~ s I~-= H~ ~m `a ~" ~ ^ a *' `~ ~ ~ y y. ~~ ~' ~~r ~ : Ln: Y ~ ` Tg o ,^ r ~ [F's J: 9 ~j'r~;~ ~ ~, a ~„~ r:~ , X+%`. .~ 6 3 W f U LL f F U e ~, ~ Z ~ F W ~ w a c¢i W w ~ W u o ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ O _ a m W , ~ z ~ ~ ~ z t{t tStStSt ~G :l ^ Z era W ~ ~ -~ W s o eo m ,. s ~_, O O LL _S j Z. ~ GEC ~/, ~ N \~ ~~ ~ ~~,; ,l ..-~) \ ~ ~B~ Z ~.n4?% ~`~~ I ;~-1~- ~ a i~ c~ ~~ ) . o '~- L.--~ f ~ Q ~ ~ ~'.\ ~.. 4 `~~,~ ~; ,~ ti~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~r w r~ ; ( i ~ / i1 ~~ III Y ~/r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ -L'-~ v..~ ~ i y. ' ~, ~/~ ~~`I , 1 ~y~' i ~ ~ it i 1 ~, , ,'~Gr,'r 1 ~, ~ ~~ ? ~~ < I ~' ~ ~ ill i '`'-Lr~~~)~~'~sr'V sV ~~,~ ~ ~ ~ ; <. ;' ~ n,~ i .\ .~1 - i ~ll~~~ ~" ~ ~ . ~ „~~l i ~ ~' ~,, c .. ~~ J~: W w pod ~ y N ~ W Z u! U U O J W LL N 7 2 ~ ~ a z ~~ 1j Z y w A ~ ~ oa S w ~~ o m d _z ~_, T ~ LL V oC ~ ! M 0 A \` a ~ Illi. 1, \\ 41 ~c)~~a~:.~ mar/ ~~- ~m c ~g ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public DATE: September 25, 2001 orks/City Engineer SUBJECT: Butterfield Stage Road/CETAP Corridors RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive Ind file BACKGROUND: Eric Haley, RCTC Executive Director is scheduled to attend our City Council Meeting and discuss the status of the CETAP Corri~or Process as it relates to Butterfield Stage Road. On Monday August 27rh and Wednesday August 29rh the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) held public scoping meetings at the Temecula Library to share information and receive input from citizens about the CETAP process and obtions under consideration for future transportation corridors to serve Southwestern Riverside County. One of the corridors being evaluated is the Winchesterto Ter the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptabili jointly by the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Ti one component of the Riverside County Integrated Projec County General Plan update and aMulti-Species Habitat Cor County. The Winchesterto Temecula Corridor has been de the future to provide additional north-south transportation op, County. SR79 North/Winchester is projected to have a 240` Several alternatives routes are under consideration to pr corridors. Two alternative routes (5A & 56) would run alc boundaries. Corridor 5A generally follows Butterfield Stage North) to State Route 79 South, and then continues west alor continues south from SR 79 South along Butterfield Stage Ro travels westerly to I-15 along the southern area of the Teme ~cula Corridor. This corridor is part of Process (CETAP) being undertaken isportation Commission. CETAP is which also includes the Riverside ervation Plan for Western Riverside rmined to be extremely important in ~rtunities in Southwestern Riverside increase in travel demand by 2020. ride for north-south transportation a the City's easterly and southerly load from Winchester Road (SR79 SR 79 South to I-15. Alternative 56 I and intercepts Anza Road and then da Valley. On August 28, 2001 several Butterfield Stage Road area prop rty owners spoke to the City Council and requested that the City voice our objections to the CETAf~ Corridors 5A and 56. The property owners were concerned that the Butterfield Stage Road alternative 5A would result in a new freeway along the City's eastern boundaries. City Council directed City Staff to meet with the property owners and report back to City Council On Wednesday August 29t" City Staff met with Cathy Bechtel from RCTC and Steve Smith, the County's transportation consultant, to discuss the CETAP corridor statuses, preliminary traffic volume projects and the recent property owner concerns with the CETAP study corridors 5A and 56. City staff was told that RCTC understood that the City of Temecula would not support a roadway r:\agdrpi\2001\0925\BSR CETAP classification greater than an expressway along Butterfield ; City Manager and Public Works Director met with approxim property owners who were concerned about the study aligr that the City was aware of the CETAP process and stu consistently held a position that the City of Temecula would Stage Road. As a result of the RCTC scooping sessions, several people appeared at the CETAP meeting of September 4, 2001 alternatives 5A and 56. The CETAP advisory committee vote 5A and 56 from consideration. The CETAP recommendation by the RCTC Board on Monday September 10, 2001. After remove alternatives 5A and 5B as "locally preferred" routes. alternatives for completion of the study process so that th completed. RCTC understands that the City of Temecula we system along Butterfield Stage Road that is greater than the FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: CETAP EIR/EIS Scoping Information Packet for the CETAP Transportation Corridor Map ae Road. On Friday, August 315'the ly thirty Butterfield Stage Road area nts. The property owners were told alternatives and that the City has support a freeway along Butterfield from the Butterfield Stage Road area and expressed their frustration with ~d unanimously to remove alternatives to remove 5A and 56 was considered discussion the RCTC Board voted to The route will still need to remain as environmental process is properly uld be opposed to any transportation General Plan designation. to Temecula Corridor r:~agdrpt\2001\0925\BSR CETAP RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PROJECT AUGUST 1001 CETAI EIR/EIS SCOPINC INFORMATION PACKET CETAP EIR/EIS WWCHESTER TO TEMECULA CORRIDOR RCIP/CETAP History And Background The Winchester to Temecula Corridor is part of the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) being undertaken jointly) by the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC). CETAP is one .component of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP), which also includes the Riverside County General Plan update and a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for western Riverside County. The purpose of the RCIP is to integrate the processes of planning land Muses, transportation improvements and preserving habitat for endangered species. A primary objective of the RCIP is to accommodate projected population growth within Riverside County by focusing development within areas that will be readily accessible, will provide a good quality of life ~or future residents, and will minimize environmental and community impacts, including impacts to sensitive habitats and endangered species. The RCIP process seeks to achieve concurrent approvals of the General Plan update, the MSHCP, and two CETAP transportation corridors internal to Riverside County (Winchester to Temecula; Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore) by the year2002: Separate environmental documents are being prepared for the General Plan update and the MSHCP. • _AccordingSo_current projections by_the Southern California Association of Govemmenu (SCAG), population and employment aze expected to more than doublf in western Riverside County within the next 20 years. Due to the fast pace of development, opportuntties are being lost to preserve land for habitat conservation and regional transportation facilities. Therefore, an important goal of CETAP is to complete environmental documentation by year 2002, sufficient for use in preserving right-of--way for regional transportation facilities. These facilities are intended to address the mobility needs for both people and goods, with the potential for incorporating the needs for highways and transit, as well as utilities, where appropriate. These facilities may follow existing transportation routes, or traverse presently undeveloped areas. Through early CETAP planning studies, four major transportation corridors have been identified for more detailed analysis, including Winchester to Temecula, Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore, Riverside County to Orange County, and Moreno Valley to San Bema~rdino County. In July, 2000, the RCTC Board and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors directed the initiation of engineering and environmental studies for the Winchester to Temecula and Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore corridors, which will move forward in parallel. The objective of the proposed EIR/EIS is to provide environmental analysis of a multi-modal transportation corridor within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor study area to allow agencies to proceed with the preservation of right-of--way for a preferred route alternative. As part of this action, it is the intent to secure concurrence from appropriate localep regional, state, and federal agencies to allow the preferred alternative to be constructed at the time Y'unding becomes available. Even though actual construction of transportation facilities in this corridormay be a number of years away, there is an urgent need and unique opportunity to make these decisions in conjunction with decisions being • made on habitat conservation and land use within the RCII'I process. It is important to make these decisions concurrently, and to have certainty as to the ability to construct the needed transportation facilities so that land development can take place in an or~erly, efficient, and predictable manner, v:~svcvsa~wr s~Dp~Dg mlu.doc (osnoroq ' RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTE GRATED PROJECT (CETAP EIR/EIS SCUPINC INYORYAI'ION YAC KEI' • AUGUST 4001 CEl'AP EIR/EIS • minimizing the impacts on habitat, aquatic resources, communities, land owners, and other elements of the environment. Similar to the other two components of the RCIP, the CETAP planning effort has been a stakeholder driven process involving a CETAP Advisory Committee wh~~ se membership includes representation from government, environmental organizations, and the building industry. The CETAP planning process is documented in a series of working papers prepared for use by the CETAP Advisory Committee, the County Board of Supervisors, and the RTC Board. The working papers are available for review at the County and RCTC offices. Purpose And Need Purpose Of The Proposed Transportatioo Action. The purpose of the proposed transportation action in the Winchesterto Temecula Corridor is: to provide multi-modal transportation improvements that alill help alleviate future traJfrc demands and congestion and improve the movement oJ' people and ~oods between the Winchester area and the existing Interstate corridors. • The following discussion supports the purpose of the action by summarizing the need for transportation improvements in this corridor. Background information can be provided upon request. In addition, the EIR/EIS will have detailed description of the need for transportation improvements and the required background information that presents the context and support for both the purpose and need. Need For the Proposed Transportation Action. This (section describes the needs that make transportation improvements in the corridor necessary. (The overall need is stated below and supported by background material that is available upon request and will be provided in the EIR/EIS. Given the projected growth and development in Western R access to the regional transportation system, increased !a inadequate mobility on existing facilities, including regii the study area in the future. There is lack ojan ejfrcient Interstate freeways to address the projected movement a within the interior oJWestern Riverside County. The following statements reflect a summary of the need statement stated above: • Growth Projections Within Western Riverside County. • Limited North-South Access to Current and Future Emp • Inadequate Future Mobility on Existing Facilities within Study Area. erside County, there will be inadequate tl and regional traffic congestion, and al highways and local arterials within vnnection between Winchester and the people and goods 20 years from now information supporting the overall Locations. Winchesterto Temecula Corridor P:lSVC933\WT Scoping Info.doc (08/09/01) • u RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTECRATEU PROJECT AV GUST 5001 Proposed Action The proposed action is the preservation of right-of--way for (generally ranging between 300 and 1000 feet in width) and within the corridor study area. The width defined for preser 1000 foot range where circumstances clearly define where th in the high end of the range where circumstances warrant E impacts, based on more detailed future engineering and envii defining whether the future facility would be a freeway, maj~ refers to the number of lanes (mixed flow and high occupa medians, shoulders, and buffer areas, and the number of t corridor will then be the subject of a future detailed analysi the preferred altemative and the least environmentally dan As part of this action, it is the intent to secure concurrence fi federal agencies as to the right-of--way most likely to rest facility that represents the LEDPA. Construction-level envil permits, would be obtained at a future date. Winchester to Temecula Corridor Description The Winchester to Temecula corridor is defined as represent area connecting Banning/Beaumont, Hemet, San Jacinto, T Banning and Beaumont are located along the 1-10 corridor aF City of Hemet. The City of Hemet is located along the Approximately 16 miles south of Hemet is the Murrieta/Terr vicinity of the I-215/1-15/SR-79 junction. The focus of EIR/EIS is on the southern portion of the corridor, from ~ Winchester area to I-15 south of Temecula as shown in Exhil Winchester to Temecula Corridor Alternative The following listing represents the CETAP alternatives to the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. The exact type accommodated within the right-of--way will be deter environmental documentation, but could include as much a lanes plus a transitway, plus room for utilities. Each altemai on the HOV lanes appropriate for year 2025. In alignments (except for the no-build altemative) also includes transit s~ vicinity of SR-79/Ynez Road in Temecula. P:\SVf933\WT Scoping Info.doc (08/09/01) EIR/EIS SLOPING INYUKN ATI ON PACKET CETAP EI0./F.IS me multi-modal transportation corridor ssociated facility type and cross-section ation may be in the low end of the 300. alignment must be located and may be eater flexibility to avoid and minimize Jnmental studies. Facility type involves r arterial, transitway, etc. Cross-section icy vehicle lanes), the general width of acks, if rail is included. The adopted of on-site alternatives, identification of aging practicable alternative (LEDPA): Im appropriate local, regional, state, and t in the construction of a multi-modal mmental clearance, including applicable ng the north-south travel demand in the lurrieta, and Temecula. The Cities of Jroximately 13 miles north of the intersection of the SR-79 and SR-74. :cula area located adjacent to I-15 in the the Winchester to Temecula Corridor R-79 at Domenigoni Parkway near the it 1. carried forward into the ETR/EIS for 'facility and number of lanes to be fined in subsequent, more detailed a freeway with mixed flow and HOV /e will include a level of transit service lat depart from SR-79, each altemative vice along SR-79 to a location in the ..,.: _ -. _._..,. _ _.:< - ...,E ,.. RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PRDJECT CETAP EIR/EIS SCOPINC IN PURM AI'ION PACK F.T ' AUGUST ]PRI CETAP !IR/EIS • The alternatives to be carried into the EIR/EIS are subject to the results of the scoping meetings to be held subsequent to the publication of the Federal Notice of Intent for the corridor. The proposed alternatives include: The no-build alternative-The no-build alternative will constructed within the time horizon of the study (2025). alternative assumes asix-lane freeway from the SR-79/'. 79/Domenigoni Parkway generally following the alignrt will also be conducted assuming that the SR-79 realignr highway along the Warren Road alignment. Widening o also assumed in the no-build alternative. • Alternative 1 -Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domen alignment to Scott Road. Continue along Scott Road to'. • Alternative 3 -Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domen alignment to Keller Road. Continue along Keller Road t Alternative Sa -Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Dome alignment to Pourroy Road. Continue south to Butte~e along SR-79 south within the existing right-of--way to I- 15. clude projects likely to be funded and 4mong other projects, the no-build ndetson Ave. junction to SR- nt of Warren Road. A sensitivity test :nt in this area is afour-lane arterial I-215 to three lanes in each direction is Ini Parkway along the current SR-79 15. oni Parkway along the current SR-79 I-215. iigoni Parkway along the current SR-79 d Stage Road to SR-79 South. Continue 5, with a reconstructed interchange at I- - • - - • Alternative 56 -Multi-modal facility-from SR-79/Domet~igoni Parkway along the current SR-79 alignment to Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road to ~4nza Road and a new connection from Anza Road/Pala Road westward to a new interchange at' -15 approximately 1.5 miles south of the existing SR-79/I-15 interchange. • Alternative 7a -Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domenigoni Parkway, proceeding westerly to a new interchange with I-215 approximately one mile south of Newport Road. • Alternative 76 -Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domenigoni Parkway, proceeding southwesterly to the 1-215/Scott Road interchange. • Hybrid alternative -This consists of further widening o: _ area, including_ widening of 1- I S from its junction with -- _ - in each direction (six lanes plus-one HOV lane) and-sou direction (five lanes plus one HOV lane); widening of 1• in each direction; and construction of the Date Street coi Winchester Road to 1-15, with a new interchange at 1-1_' Environmental Issues To Be Addressed Environmental Review Process. This section discusses th for the completion of the Winchester to Temecula Corri environmental issues and analysis proposed to be provid 1508.7.8, FHWA intends to tier the EIS for this project. Thl • notice shall be programmatic in scope, providing sufficient A future Tier 2 EIS will be prepared to present the design f the evaluation of the preferred route. multiple existing roadways in the study -2I5 to Winchester Road to seven lanes I of WinchesterRoad to sixlanes in each l 5 south of Newport Road to five lanes nection as a four-lane arterial from environmental review process necessary or EIR/EIS. This section describes the d in the EIR/EIS. Pursuant to 40 CFR Tier 1 EIS to be prepared pursuant to this letail to support a route location decision. atures and construction level of detail for Pas VC933\WT scoping Inro.doc (08/09/01) _ RIVf RSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED IR OJ ECT CETAP EIR/EIS 4C OPING INFORMATION PAC.KF.I' AUCUIT 3001 CETAP EI Y/EIS • The EIR/EIS will assess potential project-related and cumulative impacts anticipated to result from implementation of the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor, and will include conceptual mitigation measures to reduce these imparts. The E1R/EIS is intended to provide the necessary CEQA and NEPA clearance for preserving ~ight-of--way for a preferred alternative within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. The preferred alternative will be identified through analysis that will consider the environmental effects of each) alternative in relation to how well each altemative addresses the project objectives. Pursuant to the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act, the preferred altemative will be an alternative alig~tment most likely to yield the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). The analysis will consider both the short-term and long-term impacts associated with the vari~i us altematives described above. The analysis will be based on a conceptual engineering level of design (i.e., a facility centerline and right- of-way line are defined). A Tier 2 EIR/EIS will be required for CEQA/NEPA compliance prior to construction of the project, following completion of additional engineering for the preferred altemative. The CEQA Guidelines require preparation of objective analysis and documentation to inform decision makers, the general public, and responsible agencies of the direct and indirect environmental effects of a proposed action, to provide mitigation measures that reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts, and to identify and evaluate alternatives to the proposed project. The RCTC will be the Lead Agency for CEQA. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the County of • Riverside are Responsible Agencies for the EIR. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the lead agency for preparation of the EIS pursuant to NEPA. After its publication, the Draft EIR/EIS will be available for public review and comment, and a public hearing will take place. After all comments have been responded to, the RCTC Board of Directors may certify the Final EIR and select a preferred altemative. Following this action by the RCTCBoard of Directors, RCTC and Caltrans will request FHWA's approval of the Final EIS and issuance of a Record of Decision. Once the NEPA and CEQA processes are complete, preservation Hof right-of--way for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor can occur. Probable Environmental Effects. The following explanation of probable environmental effects of the proposed altematives within the Winchester to Temeculia Corridor is provided to help guide the analysis in the forthcoming EIR/EIS document and to provid~ information to the public and interested agencies. Air Quality. Regional and local air quality may be affected by the project. Regional emissions will be evaluated to determine if the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor would result in any exceedance of State and federal ambient air quality standards. The analysis will also address whether the proposed improvements would exceed any thresholds of significance established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). A carbon monoxide (CO) hot spot analysis will also be clonducted and the results included in the EIR/E1S. • Biological Resources. Proposed altematives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor may impact sensitive biological resources, such as plant life, wildlife, and wildlife habitat. Potential r uvc~3a~wr scoyfDg iDro.aDC ~oarovroi> 6 0.1 VF.R SIDE COU NTY INTE GRATED IROJ ELT CETAP EIR/EIS SC OPINC INY ORY ATION PACKET AUf.UST ]001 CRl'AP EIR/EIS impacts include direct loss of habitat from future grading or other future construction activities, direct loss of animals and plants by future project construction, loss or disruption of wildlife movement corridors, and habitat fragmentation. Information on biological resources from the proposed MSHCP for western Riverside County will be included in the EIR/EIS for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor as appropriate. A list of biological resources known to exist and potentially occurr ng within the Corridor will be included in the EIR/EIS. Impacts to biological resources will be es~imated based on the relationship of the Winchester to Temecula Corridor improvements to known biological resources as identified for the MSHCP. Impacts to sensitive species will be deterl~tined based on impacts to habitats for these species. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat area will be provided through the proposed conservation areas defined in the MSHCP. Additional studies for any threatened or endangered species may need to be conducted as part of future construction level environmental documents. Cultural Resources. The proposed altematives have that potential to affect both prehistoric and historic cultural resources. Potential impacts include direct loss of resources from future grading or other future construction activities, as well as indirect effects resulting from future construction of the new transportation facilities that may affect the hi torical context of a particular resource. A records search will be conducted through the Arcf~aeological Information Center at UC Riverside to determine the location of known archaeological sites and any prehistoric resources -- -- _ _ _ - that are listed or eligible for the National Register ofd~ Historic Places. Because the project requires approval under NEPA, the EIR/E[S will inllclude documentation of the ptroject's compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Section 106 compliance will be conducted applying a phased approach. The level of effort for this phase will include records searches for each altemative and field surveys to spot check areas in the vicinity of recorded sites or resources. Floodplain Evaluation. The proposed project may affect federally designated floodplains. The existing floodplain setting will be documented in the EIR/ElS along with an evaluation of potential floodplain impacts and encroachments. The d termination of affected floodplains will be based on the latest available Flood Insurance Rate Maps for incorporated and unincorporated areas of Riverside County. Potential impacts would include loss of beneficial floodplain values resulting from future grading or other future construction activities, as well as increased exposure of humans to floodplain risk in areas where and altemative alignment is located within a floodplain. Hazardous Waste. A hazardous waste Initial Site Assessment (ISA) will be prepared for the proposed altematives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. A records search of agency databases will be conducted to determine whether the alternative alignments would impact known hazardous waste sites. Windshield surveys will be conducted to determine the potential presence of unknown hazardous wastes on or near the altemative alignments. Potential hazardous waste • impacts could occur from either soil or groundwater contlamination that exists within properties to be acquired for the improvements, or where contamination on an adjacent property would pose a future health risk to construction workers. P:\SVC933\WT Swping In(o.doc (08/09/01) ~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTE GRATED PR OJ EOT AUGUST 1001 I • Noise. Existing noise levels in the vicinity of the propos Temecula Corridor will be documented in the EIR/EIS evaluate projected noise levels resulting from operation The study will focus on identifying potential noise ii residential uses, hospitals, libraries, and parks. Potentia exposure resulting from increased vehicular or rail traffic FTAP EIR/F.IS SC OPINO INYIIKYAI'ION PACKF'.T CET'AP EIK/!IR q I alternatives within the Winchester to A noise study will be conducted to 'the proposed corridor improvements. pacts to sensitive receptors, such as noise impacts include increased noise ~ithin a specific altemative alignment. Section 4(f). Section 4(t) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 specifies that publicly owned land from public parks, recreation areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, or any significant historic site may not be used for projects that use federal funds unless: • There is no feasible and prudent altemative to the use The highway program or project includes all possible resulting from such use. The EIR/EIS will include an evaluation of potential imps from implementation of the proposed alternatives within ~ Socioeconomic and Land Use. The EIR/EIS will incl --will-address the-potential-socioeconomic.-.impacts of Winchester to Temecula Corridor. The analysis wil socioeconomic impacts of the CETAP corridors, with an Order 12898 regarding Environmental Justice and Execu Children. The analysis will provide a description of exi< population conditions in the vicinity of the project ahem the potential impacts on the residential population an project impact area for each alternative, including land t the proposed improvements. The analysis of land use H on Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of environmental-justice, right-of--way displacements,-n neighborhood cohesion, and fiscal impacts (i.e., estim revenues) will be included. The analysis shall also regional, and state regulations and plans. Visual. Implementation of the proposed improvemer within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. A visua Ellt/EIS to address how the project will affect the exi characteristics ofthe area surrounding each project alter visual resources will be identified in the analysis. Key i removal of vegetation (trees, etc.), the alteration of construction of roads and highway improvements whet will describe the existing visual characteristics of the • resources. Photographs from viewpoints near the projel potential visual impacts from future project constructic views from existing roadways and views of the propose such land. to minimize harm to 4(f) lands to 4(f) resources, which could result W inchester to Temecula Corridor. )de a Community Impact Analysis that the .proposed alternatives within the be conducted to determine potential :mphasis on compliance with Executive ive Order 13045 regarding Protection of ing land use, housing, employment, and hives. The impact analysis will address local business community within the se compatibility impacts associated with III assess the impacts of each altemative Statewide Importance. Discussions on location assistance, business impacts, Ited loss of property tax and sales tax ddress consistency with relevant local, s will change the visual characteristics impact analysis will be included in the ling visual setting. The existing visual alive will be documented and significant sues to be considered in this analysis are significant land forms, and the future ;none presently exist. This assessment area and identify any significant visual altematives will be used to evaluate the 1. Impacts shall be assessed in terms of improvements, as well as the sensitivity P:\gVC933\WT Sniping Info.doc (08/09/01) RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTE CRATED PROJECT iCf TAP EIR/f13 SCOYINO INYONN ATION PACKIa' • AUGUST 8001 CY.T"AP fIR/yF.t3 • la. T: of affected viewers. Potential impacts from light and glare will also be included in the EIR/EIS. Water Resources. The proposed altematives within they Winchester to Temecula Corridor will be evaluated with respect to their potential effect on waters of the U.S. The evaluation will initially focus on opportunities to avoid impacts to these waters, where feasible, by shifting alignments. The EIR/EIS will describe impacts to those water resources that cannot be avoided, and will include mitigation measures to reduce impacts aln those resources. Potential impacts to water resources include direct impacts such as dredging or filling of streams, rivers, and lakes, as well as indirect effects to water resources resulting f ~ m increased runoff from impervious surfaces such as roads and bridges. Geology and Soils. The Ellt/EIS will discuss potential geological impacts of the proposed improvements, with an emphasis on whether alternatives Twill result in any increased potential for landslides or seismic hazards. The EIR/EIS will also i iscuss the increased potential for soil erosion. Public Services and Utilities. The EIR/EIS will disc public services (fire, police, schools, and other public 1 • electricity;-solid waste; and wastewater):-Potential iml emergency vehicles during future construction, effects acquisition is required, as well as indirect impacts such Potential impacts to public utilities include direct impac may require relocation of existing utilities. Transportation/Traflic. While the proposed improve effect on regional traffic circulation, the EIR/EIS will both regional and local traffic conditions. Adverse im traffic volumes are increased as a result of the caps improvements. • s the potential for adverse impacts to ilities) and public utilities (gas, water, :ts to public services include delays to n schools (both direct impacts if land s noise), and access to public facilities. where the transportation improvements is are expected to have a beneficial yze the effect of the alternatives on may occur on other facilities where increase provided by the proposed P:\SVC933\WT Scoping In(o.doc (Og/09/OI ) Winchester to Temecula Corridor Analysis EIR I EIS Alternatives <7a f7 ~- ._-- ._~- ;. - - - ... ~. ~ , ..y .,, s; •--- .1~_ ,_ - DIAMOND ~ALLEYL4KE i. ~ ~ i •~: -- s ~ ,`. 7b-~ ~ _-. ~T_ ,. `, _.- _- 3'-.- --_. ..._-, ...~. ,_.. li ~, ~/ ~ IDT' I ~~ !n __ . - i _.. ~ NN -. .' `""~ ~~ ~ .~~ . l 5a, 5~ - ,.•., ' .~ ,~_ ~.,... `, ~ i ,: ~, ,. ~~.~ ,~ __ ; ` z :. 000 0 ,_ -- _. _.- - _.-^° rl ' PRELIMINARY ~~s~' a - _ R' +~~i TM DRAFT -- - ! ~~ ~.~.u..rr ~. .~q_ .w ~"~ ~ ~, r e... w .~~u.ee~b eh ~'- ~ , \i Y~1~11w f/~~ .. ~ O MMWIIY Ti~Mwnrr C/~°~ ~+O~e~vi Q ~MwtlM M~.~ ~swM~ ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Proposed Urban Limit Line PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION N0.01 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO NCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AI~ URBAN LIMIT LINE FOR THE EAST AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA'S PLANNI G AREA TO IMPLEMENT THE GENERAL PLAN BACKGROUND: On March 27, 2001 the City Council directed staff to prepare a map depicting an urban limit line on the easterly side of the City of Temecula. This map has been created in response to comments made by Supervisor Buster during the'March 20, 2001 Board of Supervisors public hearing for the Morgan Hill Specific Plan (SP 313). Su ervisor Buster was supportive of the creation of an urban limit line and pledged to take the matter up with the Board of Supervisors for consideration after the City Council adopted an urban limit line map. This item was initially scheduled by the City Council at its April 24, 2001 meeting. At that meeting, the Council decided to continue this off calendar until the some of the regional growth issues and the results of the County General Plan Update process were~i better defined. The purpose of this item is to bring the matter back to the Council for their consideration. The purpose of an Urban Limit Line is to focus urban-scale protect agricultural areas from urban encroachment, presen spaces which are important to preserving the local quality of many policy statements that would support the intent of an urb policies are provided in Attachment No. 2. Staff found no polic concept of limiting the location of future urban development i evelopment in urban areas and to habitat areas, and maintain open e. The City General Plan contains i limit line. The text of these related statements that were contrary to the currently rural areas. R:~genplAN\Urban Limit Line CC2.doc FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution Adopting The Urban Limit Line - F 2. A map entitled "Urban Limit Line Within the City Territory of the County of Riverside" -Page 7 3. General Plan Consistency Analysis -Page 8 e3 Temecula and the Unincorporated R:\GENPLAMUrban Limit Line CC2.doc ATTACHMENT N0.1 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE LIMIT LINE R:\GENPLAN\Urban Limit Line CC2.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU TEMECULA ADOPTING AN URBAP EAST AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE I PLANNING AREA TO IMPLEMENT WHEREAS, The City of Temecula adopted a contained all the required elements and four optional e ICIL OF THE CITY OF LIMIT LINE FOR THE ITY OF TEMECULA'S 'HE GENERAL PLAN Plan on November 9, 1993 that WHEREAS, The Land Use Element of the General Plan contains goal and policystatements that support the preservation of rural areas, the protection of gnvironmental resources, and the need to coordinate regional growth patterns with surrounding jurisdictions; WHEREAS, The City of Temecula has endeavored to work with the County of Riverside to intelligently plan for and deal with urban growth pressures in the Southwestern Planning Area since the City's incorporation in December of 1989; WHEREAS, The Open Space/Conservation Elemenf of the General Plan contains goal and policy statements that support the preservation of agricultur ,open space/habitat areas; WHEREAS, The Growth ManagemenUPublic Facilities Element of the General Plan contains goal and policy statements that support the preservation of agriculture, open space, habitat, and rural areas; WHEREAS, The Growth ManagemenUPublic Facilities Element of the General Plan contains goal and policy statements that indicate the desirability of focusing urban growth in urban areas; WHEREAS, The City of Temecula has endeavored tQ work with the County of Riverside to focus urban growth in urban areas rather than allowing it to cover all of western Riverside County; WHEREAS, The Growth ManagemenUPublic Facilities Element envisioned the adoption of a growth management strategy to address regional issues in southwestern Riverside County; WHEREAS, The City Council adopted the Growth Management Action Plan on March 21, 2000 that had the stated goals of redirecting urban growth into urban areas, conserving agricultural and habitat resources, and addressing regional infrastructure needs; WHEREAS, There is a continuing need to attempt to to protect agricultural and open spaces in southwestern Rig WHEREAS, An urban limit line is a recognized appro. spread of urban development into agricultural, open space, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thattheCity Line contained in Exhibit A as an official policy of the City of development into rural and agricultural area adjacent to tht Riverside to consider the needs and welfare of the current Riverside County and restrain additional urban sprawl east the Lake Skinner and Westside Reservoir reserves. urban growth in urban areas and County; to prevent the continued unplanned ~itat, and rural areas; ;ouncil hereby adopts the Urban Limit emecula to limit the spread of urban City and encourages the County of nd future residents of southwestern td south of the City of Temecula and R:\GENPLAN\Urban Limit Line CC2.doc PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City day of , 2001. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temect 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City CoL meeting thereof held on _ day of 2001, by AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ncil of the City of Temecula this Jeff Comerchero, Mayor do hereby certify that Resolution No. I of the City of Temecula at a regular following vote: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\GENPLAN\Urban Limit Line CC2.doc 5 EXHIBIT A R:\GENPLAN\Urban Limit Line CC2.doc ATTACHMENT NO. PROPOSED URBAN LIMIT LINE MAP R:\GENPLAN\Urban Limit Line CC2.doc Proposed Urban Lim Line Ranch/ h/ O Proposed Urban Limit Line Parcels Q City Boundary i_ Sphere of Influence Boundary ® Water Bodies 0 Lake Skinner Reserve Area 0 Johnson Ranch Open Space Area 0 Pechanga Reservation . ; Highways ~., :' Streets N September 25, A TbrropwmW qpy Ciy W iemci~ Gcprpb iMOmras~. r~•+evanwa aom ee.mn pm,K,e qu+a w..tlee carM~.®n ~eMre w w r.~a wa uwps~rn b...y ~~ /w..w.ra+r re. c„a*..ww.MV~ 'wrwAyIX ~ bMYM1mimmOMM wLptlbsu-{`d-Y VCS (ypp'io~ IKVm4n 8nYm~tl(U~I WCY WYJ 1PMME blly nW vi~llMwm4t~. Tq mgsMb,PFAaiW~. 3000 0 3000 6000 Feet auon+~orw.w.•.v ATTACHMENT NO. GENERAL PLAN CON ANALYSIS R:\GENPLAN\Urban Limit Line CC2.doc EXCERPTS FROM THE LAND USE ELEMENT GOaI 2 A City of diversified development chars protected and co-exist with newer urban where rural and historical areas are Dl$cU$$iOri The lazge lot and rural residentia]/agriculti lifestyle and open space chazacter about Temp The historical resources in the community, Sage Stop along Highway 79 South, aze preserved. Future project approvals within c affect the long-term integrity of these areas. Policy 2.1 Provide physical and visual buffers residential and agricultural areas an density residential development. al azeas in the community represent a Dula that many residents want to maintain. ncluding Old Town and the Butterfield Hued by the community and should be adjacent to rural and historical areas will reas to create a transition between rural commercial, industrial and other higher Policy 23 Define the rural and historical areas of [he community to be conserved, and establish a procedure for adding azeas br altering boundaries as necessary. Goa14 A development pattern that preserves and enhances the environmental resources of the Study Area. Dlscll$$iori The General Plan Study Area is rich in I resources. Furthermore, the hillsides in the an aesthetic backdrop for the community anticipated to ultimately be urbanized, it is space that is of value for its biological, recrea Policy 4.2 Consider [he constraints of natural location, type and intensities of new Policy 4.3 Cooperate with other agencies to Plans in western Riverside and not quality and diversity of its biological heastern portion of the Study Area form Although the majority of the azea is tortant that the City seek to retain open tal, visual or aesthetic characteristics. man-made hazards in determining the ;lop Multi-species Habitat Conservation San Diego Counties. R:\GENPLAMUrban Limit Line GP Analysis.doc Goal S A City which is compatible and coordinate with regional land use patterns. D1SClls$lOri Temecula is a leader in the region in terms c of residential development. The land use de indirect impacts on surrounding commm governmental coordination, the City can p~ achieve a coordinated regional land use ps contains more specific policies related management. its commercial uses, job base, and quality sions the City makes will have direct and ies (and visa versa). Through inter- ~erly address regional land use issues to sn. The Growth Management Element to regional coordination and growth Policy 8.1 Provide a pattern of land uses that maintain and enhance the viability of neighboring communities including the City of Murrieta, and the counties of Riverside and San Diego, through co~patible uses and linkages. Policy 8.2 Provide a system of open space that is coordinated with regional open space uses to comprehensively address the nagement and conservation resources. R:\GENPLAMUrban Limit Line GP Analysis.doc EXCERPTS FROM THE OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT Goa13 Conservation of important biological species of concern, wildlife movement and protection of plant and anirttal .,and general biodiversity. DISCUSSIOri The intetrelationship between the built and n. on the character and quality of life in Teme space within the Study Area should be to con to provide recreational opportunities, and between significant natural areas. The pn preserve biological diversity; provide passive facilitate the maintenance of natural, life-sust~ the opportunity to observe wildlife in natural conjunction with recreation trails and other leverages the protection of species of concen and meeting recreational needs. The intent properly manage natural resources within and Policy 3.1 Require development proposals to id provide mitigation, including the preservation; the provision of replay planning techniques including wild; appropriate measures. Policy 3.2 Work with State, regional and nor and enhance significant biological tural environments has a strong influence ula. The permanent dedication of open serve resources of significance, as well as ~ ensure viable ecological connections nervation of natural resources helps to recreation and educational opportunities; Wing systems; and provide residents with environs. Wildlife corridors can exist in pen space uses. This multiple function by simultaneously providing open space of this goal is to identify, preserve and djacent to the community. ntify significant biological resources and use of adequate buffering; selective :ment habitats; the use of sensitive site e corridor/recreational trails; and other agencies and organizations to preserve :es on publicly owned lands. Policy 33 Coordinate with the County of Rive side and other relevant agencies in the adoption and implementation of the verside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Goa17 Protection of prime agricultural land from premature conversion to urbanized uses. D1SCllS$lori Growth pressures are threatening valuable agricultural land, which is an important component of Riverside County's economy iand the agricultural lifestyle that many residents desire. The intent is [o limit the adverse effects of urbanization on areas determined appropriate for long-term agricultut~al uses. Policy 7.1 Encourage the continued production of prime agricultural soils, groves and other agricultural activities in the Study Area and adjacent wine country. R:\GENPLAMUrban Limit Line GP Analysis.doc Policy 7.2 Coordinate as necessary with Agricultural Element. Policy 7.3 Discourage urban development in or the existing built-up azeas of the OPEN SPACE/CONSERVAT IMPLEMENTATION PROGP D. Conservation of Biological Resources 2. Require the establishment of open courses, wildlife corridors, and habi species. H. Conservation of Agricultural 2. Recognize existing agriculture p additional prime agriculture land. County in the prepazation of a County azeas outside the Village Centers ELEMENT MEASURES ice areas that contain significant water for rare or endangered plant and animal contracts and promote the inclusion of R:\GENPLAMUrban Limit Line GP Analysis.doc EXCERPTS FROMI THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT/PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Goal 1 Cooperative management of growth amo i g local governments within Riverside County. Dl$CU$slori The City's Growth Management Element sup I rts WRCOG's effort to develop a growth management strategy in which all jurisdictionls within Riverside County can participate. Many of the draft policies in WRCOG's strategy, which the City has helped to shape and influence, are incorporated below. These policies ]ink to other General Plan policies which help to reinforce the internal consistency among the elements of the General Plan. Policy 1.5 Encourage or assist in the establishm nt of natural reserves for the preservation of sensitive and endangered species, a{rd to provide open space for residents. GOaI 2 Orderly and efficient patterns of growth within Temecula that enhance the quality of life for residents. D1SCllS$lOri The Growth Management Strategy contair framework for a future Growth Manageme designed to influence adequacy of public location, phasing, type, quality and intensity should also take into consideration the exis[ii [he Sphere of Influence, and Environmen Element, in essence, support this goal. in [his Element is intended to be the Program (GMP). This GMP should be icilities and services in relation to the new development and redevelopment. It communities and resources of Temecula, Study Area. All the policies of this Policy 2.6 Establish priority growth azeas near-term urbanization will be e GROWTH MANAGEMENT/PUBLIC IMPLEMENTATION PROGF A. Growth Management Program 4. Direct Growth in the Urbanized Areas 6. Conserve Resources the City and Sphere of Influence where ~ILITIES ELEMENT :MEASURES R:\GENPLAN\Urban Limit Line GP Analysis.doc ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUL~ AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/,pC(it~y Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, De~ City Manager DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Appointment of Members to the General Community Advisory Committee PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council do the following: 1. ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CREATING THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND SETT~NG FORTH THEIR DUTES AND TERMS 2. Appoint the remaining members of the General Plan Community Advisory Committee. BACKGROUND: To assist in the process of updating' the General Plan, the City Council approved staff's recommendation regarding the appropriatg representative stakeholders for the community advisory committee at its June 12, 2001 meeting. The anticipated role of the Community Advisory Committee is to assist the staff and the consultant in identifying issues; reviewing the goals and policies, and assisting in the development of alternative I nd use and circulation plans. The City Council determined that the Committee would be composed of the following: 1 Planning Commissioner 1 Public Traffic Safety Commissioner 1 Community Services Commissioner 1 Representative of the Chamber of Commerce or the Economic Development Council (As determined by the City Council) 1 Representative of a local environmental or community organization (As determined by the City Council) 5 City residents (One appointed by each Council mem er) R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory CommitteeWdvisory Comm ttee Appointments CC2.doc 1 The Committee representatives from the Public Traffic Safe Commissions have already been appointed. Their recd Commission's are Darrel Connerton, James Meyler, and complete the Committee selection process, it is recommen representative from the Chamber of Commerce or Ec representative of a local environmental or community orge appointed by each Council member) to serve on the Comm FISCAL IMPACT: The costs associated with this item are Budget. Attachments Draft Resolution Creating the Community Advisory Community Servies, and Planning fended representatives for these yid Matthewson, respectively. To I that the City Council appoint one ~mic Development Council, one ation and five City residents (one y Advisory Committee. in the FY2001-02 Operating - Page 3 R:\GENPLAMComp Plan Update\Community Advisory CommineeWdvisory Committee Appointments CC2.doc 2 ATTACHMENTI DRAFT RESOLUTION CREATING THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE A:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory CommitteeWdvisory Committee Appointments CC2.doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CI TEMECULA CREATING THE GEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND DOTES AND TERMS WHEREAS, The City of Temecula adapted its first WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that t. General Plan to ensure its appropriateness and accuracy; L OF THE CITY OF PLAN COMMUNITY IG FORTH THEIR Plan on November 9, 1993; is a need to review and update the WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that an advisory committee should be created to assist the staff and the consultant in preparing a revised draft General Plan for the Planning Commission and City CounciPs consideration; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF i HE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Establishment. The City Council heretiy directs the creation and appointment of a short-term Community Advisory Committee. Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of the Community Advisory Committee is to assist City staff and consultant team in the review of draft documents associated with the General Plan update process to provide community input into the process. Section 3. Members. The Community Advisory following: A. A City Planning Commissioner; B. A City Public Traffic Safety Commiss C. A City Community Services Commis: D. A member of the Chamber of Comme E. A representative of a local environme F. Five City residents, each selected by Section 4. Duties. The duties and function of the follows: A. Select one of their membership to Punt Chairman appointed by a majority vote of the Committee. T Chairman's absence) will be responsible for facilitating them. the members of the Committee have an opportunity to p Chairman will work with the City Staff to ensure that the other in a timely manner. B. Meet and discuss General Plan by the Director of Planning. shall be composed of the or Economic Development Council; al or community organization; and, member of the City Council. Advisory Committee are as n as Chairman and another as Vice- Chairman (or Vice Chairman in the ing discussions and ensuring that all cipate in a meaningful way. The ties of the Committee are performed issues at the time and place selected R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory CommitteeWdvisory Committee Appointments CC2.doc 4 C. Review and provide comments to the Director of Planning on various background reports and studies being prepared as part of the process of updating the City General Plan. Examples of these reports and studies include: background and issue reports, draft goal and policy reports, and alternative land use and circulation plans. Section 5. Term. The Community Advisory Committee shall cease to function or meet when the City Planning Commission begins its consideration of the Draft General Plan, unless the Planning Commission or City Council specifically requests additional input on a particular subject or issue. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City day of , 2001. ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula 2001-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Counc meeting thereof held on _ day of 2001, by the AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: of the City of Temecula this Jeff Comerchero, Mayor do hereby certify that Resolution No. I of the City of Temecula at a regular following vote: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory CommitteeWdvisory Comm~nee Appointments CC2.doc 5 ITEM 2 APPROVAL ITY ATTORNEY IRECTOR OF FINA E ITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUU AGENDA REPORT TO: City M Hager/City Council FROM: Gran tes, Assistant to the CityManager DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Future City Hall Site Selection PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Senior RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: (1) Appoint an ad-hoc committee to participate in the site s (2) Provide direction to staff to prepare a Request for Qual this selection process Analyst process for a future City Hall and (RFO) to hire a consultant to lead BACKGROUND: At the June 26'h City Council meeting, Councilmember Pratt requested that the City Council consider a site for a new City Hall. This issue was also discussed on July 10'" and at that time, the City Council directed staff to bring bac a work plan for further discussion as this project has been recently included in the FY 2002-2006~Capital Improvement Program. Staff has discussed this work plan and is recommending th committee to help guide the process. Staff is recommending long-term goals for the community as it relates to a new process, and provide design/cost information on various a interview councilmembers and select communitymembers tc the City Hall. The current CIP budget has funds set aside to hire a cony staff is also recommending that the City Council authorize it the City Council appoint an ad-hoc Ne hire a consultant to help us identify ;ity Hall, assist in the site selection ernatives. The consultant can also help guide us as we create a vision for t to perform this work. Therefore, to send out the RFQ. FISCAL IMPACT: $75,000 has been approved and i$ available in the CIP for a preliminary study of this project. ITEM 2 APPROVAL ATTORNEY RECTOR OF FINA E TY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUU AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Consideration of Increased Councilmember Pratt) Service for Temecula (initiated by RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide direction to staff regarding the possible increase in bus service for Temecula BACKGROUND: Councilmember Pratt has requested that the City Council consider requesting that the RTA provide increased bus service for Tggmecula. This would include express commuter service to Escondido and to the Corona and Riverside Metro Link Stations. In addition, RTA has already planned to re-establish the HolidayShoppgr Bus Service within Temecula. To increase ridership for the Holiday Bus Shopper Bus Service more promotion and advertising would be coordinated through the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA). As for the express bus system, this program is currently included in the 10-year strategic plan for the RTA. Currently under consideration is moving this program into RTA's short-range transit plans. RTA and North County Transit have scheduled a meeting for October 12, 2001, to di cuss the possibility and coordination of such an express bus system between Escondido and Ter~,necula. Requested funding for this program is also being consi anticipated that bus service would commence at that approved. As part of this request would be the authorization of staff RTA in the planning, support and programming ofthis se through RTA for FY 2002-03. It is once funding sources have been as necessary to work with the FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. DEPARTMENTAL. REPORTS APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUU AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public We DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Department of Public Works Monthly Acti RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of August, 20 Engineer Report filing is the Department of Public MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Monthly Activity Rc August/ September Prepared By: Ward Maxwell Checked by: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: September 25, 2001 PROJECTS UNDER 1. First Street Bridge TION This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Tov/n Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. Contractor has finished the final punch list items on the street portion of the work. Construction of the EM D lift station is complete with only punch list items remaining. 2. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Restoration/ Median and Parkway Landscape Improvements The project installed landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane and restored the wetlands in the construction zone. It included the installation of an irrigation system, planting, and hydroseeding. Median and parkway work is complete. Plant establishment period and 5-)ear maintenance began in June. 3. Pala Road Soundwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry blc Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. Notice of 4. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho Via Montezuma This project will construct aloes-flow crossing of Murrieta Cr Montezuma. In addition, this project will rehabilitate the street of Recording a conservation easement is in progress for the mitigati~ 5. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III This project will modify the existing two story masonry block build office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including second floor restrooms. Rough framing, electrical, and plumbing is elevator underway. Progress is being made on both the interior addition. 6. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road This project will widen Margarita Road from Pio Pico to Dartolo Rc Portola to SR 79 South. Included with this project is the pavement Pio Pico. The contractor has completed the street work, some mec soundwalls on Pala Road from west of npletion is going to Counci109/25/01. Road -Low-flow Crossing at connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Moutezuma. This project is complete. of the disturbed area. [o accommodate a new second floor of installation of an elevator, and two new dly complete with the installation of the and the new single story and re-landscape the medians from De labilitation of Phase II (Pauba Road to t island work will continue. The two R:\Mon[hlyAc[ivityReport\Cn'\2001 \Augus[. doc traffic signals at Pio Pico and at De Portola should be in maintenance period will conclude at the end of this year. 7. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification mode on 9/19/01. The plant This project modifies the existing culvert in order to eliminate slope erosion problem. The Project is complete. Notice of Completion approved at the August 28, 2001~City Council meeting. 8. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Margarita R was tamed on 8/30/01. 9. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly complete with the Notice of Completion pending. 10. Senior Center Expansion and Stonewood Drive. The traffic signal limits to Overland Drive. The work is The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. A contract was awarded to R. Moody Construction on June 26 in the amount of $508,500. Expansion will include the addition o~ 3000 square feet of building area for recreational, office and meeting purposes. The Contractor has completed the demolition work. The foundation concrete pour was done September 11 and framing started. 11. Pavement Management System -Citywide This project will involve rehabilitating the pavement of var McLaughlin Engineering and Mining Corp. was awarded a cor amount of $2,073,000. The roads scheduled for constmction are La Paz Road, Winchester Road (Between Diaz and Enterprise Cil Winchester and Overland), Main Street, Enterprise Circle West (Between Margarita and Ynez). The project is essentially Compl all that remain. 12. AC Street Repairs - FY2001 streets in [he City for FY 2000-O1. at the June 26 Council meeting in the cho California Road, Mira Loma Drive, Ues[), Southbound Ynez Road (Between ith of Winchester), and Overland Drive Traffic Striping and punch list items are This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct selected City streets Cunningham Davis was awarded the contract at the June 26 Council meeting in the amount of $ 117,000. ~'he roads scheduled for construction are Margarita Road at Avenida Cima Del Sol, Jefferson Avenue at Del RIio, Overland Drive at Commerce Center, Enterprise Circle West at Rider Way, and Diaz Road at Rancho Way. The project is essentially Complete. Traffic Striping and punch list items are all that remain. 13. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool A 25-yard x 25-meter pool will be built at Chaparral High Sct recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room faci play equipment will be included as an element in the base construct for August 13, 2001, and work is expected to be completed by N relocating the underground utilities and both pool excavations are The facility will include a smaller s, restrooms and showers. Spray-type bid. The Notice to Proceed was issued h 2002. The contractor is working at rly completed. R: VvIOU1hIyAc[ivityReport\CIP\2001 W ugustdoc 14. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project This Project will install approximately one half mile of sidewalk along the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Blite Bobcat Service, Inc. was awarded the contract at the July 24 Council meeting in the amount of $51,790. Work on this project is essentially complete. Contractor is scheduled to finish the final punch list items by September 21. 15. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden sigtts in the La Serena area and replacing them with plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. The signs have been purchased and City forces will start installing the new signs shortly. PROJECTS BEING NONE PROJECTS IN 1. Pala Road Improvements -Phase II (79 South to Pechan This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. design. The approval of Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Study by ] hydrology studies upstream of Wolf Creek require prior approval i appraiser to assist in the preparation of the real estate appraisal rep this time. 2. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta FOR BIDS Road) a Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan ork is proceeding on the remainder of the FC & WCD has been delayed because n RCFC &WCD. Staff will be using an The project is funded fordesign only at This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Mumeta Creek to provide four additional traffic lanes. Consultant is investigating potential lateral spreading and scour and ways to mitigate these impacts. 90% drawings will be submitted shortly after analysis is complete. 3. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community design is progressing on schedule. Utility services constrnction is be project. Staff returned checked plans to architect on 8/28/01. Archi services construction will be coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase 1 4. Pauba Road Improvements -Phase II (Margarita Road to This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter [o just west of ]! designed and built on Pauba Road, just h library resources and services. The coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II t is working on the final plans. Utility Street Improvements. er Road) Road to its ultimate width. The R:\N[onthlyACtivityReport\CIP\2001 \Augustdoc project is in design and the work is being coordinated with design being addressed. 90% design plans were submitted to the City for staff and were returned to Consultant for completion of final desi 5. Murrieta Creek Bridge -Overland Drive Extension to Di; This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an exte Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The projl from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extensi to Diaz Road. Project Design Consultant (PDC), the designer, has currently reviewing the document. 6. I-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Roa the library project. All utility issues aze view. Plans and specs were reviewed by plans. ion of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz includes the widening of Overland Drive of Overland Drive across Murrieta Creek the alignment study and staff is This project will re-stripe westbound Winchester Road from Ynez Road to I-15 northbound on-ramp to allow for a better flow of traffic. The City applied For an Encroachment) Permit from Caltrans to do the striping. Caltrans has just issued the Encroachment Permit Specs will be put (together and the project will be informally bid during the next period. 7. New Temecula Sports Complex A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built on Pala Road at Wolf ('Valley. A soils report was completed and forwarded to the City. The soils report indicated substantial and costly removals. Staff is evaluating options on preparing the site or choosing a different site. The consultant, RJM Design is finishing up the preliminary master plan of the sports complex. 8. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. In response to additional design cost requests by the designer, City staff has elected to complete the design in-house. Anticipated destgn completion is scheduled for November 2001. 9. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town The project will include the closing of the two median openings Town Center, while lengthening the left [urn lanes at Ynez Road, improve traffic circulation. The design is 80% complete with the design is currently at 50% completion. 10. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add rig) This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho Calif. acquisition at the northeast corner of Rancho Califomia and Ynez \ complete. 11. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to PI The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewa south side of State Highway 79 South between Pala Road and Old T~ been selected and a professional services contract will be awazded County and City is finalized. Rancho California Road in front of the vn Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to eption of the landscaping. Landscaping turn lane to westbound lanes) ria Road at Ynez Road. Right of way 1 be required. In-house design is 90% Road) landscaping, and irrigation along the t Front Street. A design consultant has len a funding agreement between the R:VvIOUthlyAc6viryRepart\CIP\2001 W ugustdce 12. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winc i ester Road and Temecula's City Limits and Diaz Road Extension This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murrieta Creek crossing between Winchester Road to the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combinedi with the Diaz Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. The Consultant and Staff met with Riverside County Fl iod Control [o discuss possible alignments. The study is currently underway. PROJECTS THAT ARE 1. Margarita Road/ Winchester Road Intersection Project is on hold. Under this project, an additional left tum ft Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic will require a Caltrans encroachment permit. 2. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements -Phase II This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth hold. OR ON-HOLD eastbound Winchester to northbound ames. Design is 50% complete. Project and Felix Valdez. The project is on 3. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson This project will add a right tum lane from Eastbound Winchester [o Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. O'Malley Engineering Corporation has provided the design survey data. Project is on hold. 4. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Loma plans and specifications aze complete. The project is being cc Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to enviro 5. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to Wolf Valley) Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be complete the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporation issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street i plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pl Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino Dri Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approximate completion d: on hold due to environmental constraints. 6. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at I-15 Pala Road and Wolf Valley rda and the other at Wolff Valley. The linated with Pechanga Development ental constraints. four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to with the second phase of construction of roject). An encroachment permit was provements. Traffic signal and striping se Two) by the Pechanga Development ,way (600 feet southeast of Wolf Valley is Spring 2001. The interim project is R:VvlonthlyActiviryRepart\CIP\2001 W ugustdoc This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the This project will widen the I-15 southbound exit-ramp at the ; additional lane on [he exit rampjust north of Winchester Road. light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street Inter have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Sty indefinitely. 7. Santiago Road/ Ynez Road Intersection Improvements This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timi has been delayed indefinitely. The Traffic Division completed that improved traffic movement through the intersection. thbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. a Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an ~f is revisiting the merits of this project in nge. The study shows that this bridge may Interchange. This project is suspended of the existing intersection. This project me minor striping and signal adjustments R:4~IoutlilyAcdviryRepart\CIP\2001 W ugustdoc n LL O ~ N r r W ~ Q a W W W LL M~ LL a Y O r Q J J_ H Z l7A ~ F- ~ LL O v } W H ~ U ~ a Z W W a J F' a U s ~ a o ~ ° B e ~ d 9 c - y '~ 0 9 6 u c ~ rv n ~ 5 o '3- a C d c_ .'~_ q° u '3 V p, yC O~ ° ~ ( ~ W La C q p u „~ v m a Q c a a ~ 9 u d ~ A ° e .~ a ~ o ~ u o Ya o a vl W o eo y 56 U, o ° a ° s C c 5 -° V eo y 3 Y- ., o. p, C n ° 0 _ ° c u ' e o G ° G' y ~ G ~ 'a ~ .v. o ~ w ~ U o d y C U y C ; u a b c y, v ~ 9~ 00 ° '~ '.. o S I ~ m45 ~a w o^3 ~p a a V d .~ 3 m .~ o ~~ y cP' o c 'q° ti ~ v u m S ~' ~ 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ v ' ~ . ,g ~ ~ `a u 6 '~ ,u L= ~ ''' m U u G G C 's p ~ d G iR 'm c C ~ o .. e p V C wG o~ ~ v. y ~ ~v °' A u U O .w '3 ~ 'C .~ u 'O ^p..b n O O ~~ O °'~ N a I I .°. I z l~ l I a ~ ~ ~ ~ _ °- _ ~ ~ ~ r a° o v ~ ~ ~ u o n m ° a r° ~° ~° a°. 5 o v B ' .C u Y~ ~~ c ' c o m ~= ~ ~ v v '~ 5 0~ 3 u O y C W. W '~ ~ 'O V c °i 3 .~ .~ ~ Y d 2~ 'o 3 a c '~ o ~= 3~ 3~ o ~' ~ 5 ~e N. o` `~- "' '$9~ cam v •~ v i • j ~ n a a v -o 6 . . ° , ~ u ~ ~ a .~ b y ~ „ m L C O v u j~ v N c U C m p~> u ~ ~ ~y 6 o V pp, C~ ~ ^^ V k~ O O ~ U a. T w o- d. p~ r0 V~ V b' ' e U U U v C o VFF ~ '° L y g 3 G ~ ~ F. A ~ ~. i a ` a `o y o E y o :i ° 3 G ° a ° o 0 0° o r '° o o a m a I z l z l~ l~ l w F. c -^ ° w ._ , -, ,- .. .. '~ a°1 6Y o ~e ~o ~ e y3e S e ~ o e ~e ~ e 68 a S°o SQe ° `4 p0.i ~ ao .°+e .°-~ o .°. a °we °x .a+ ° e ~ o w a °o c~.ai a.°w °a o (W~ ~ ' U' 9 a ~ '~' x ~ C m CC ~ ~ m m ~ 3 az ~ ~' ~ 3 &°E ~ ~ ~ 18 dQ g m d d d ~`" -W 3 y~ ~g mw m a ma ;~ v, m `e e 'y z 0 8 z~, ,~ s ~ ~ ~ a ° O _ 9 3 U a 'v ~ '' W o a ~ 4 .r. vv~~ e d ~ w 3 p 'u o` v c w .d .°. o Q U, m b N o .2 G ° ~„°-, m e Y m vi ur F" o E 2 m E °o pe y m'o U h c o ~ yi 7~ .2 vi p r .o ~ h moo '~„' o `n y W rn U'` U V Lh U ~ .j 'O .ri .O ~ Y V 0 P 'O ~.' ~ ~ O La ~ [I] •V ~y W ~ pO p~ .~ ^N,~Nix m`~,c`av ~ dU w o ~ ~~ °o ~~ ~ st ~ ~ ci a~~~ O 0.! d e o "~ ~o ~a q m U~ g c C v m~ ~ N d o W ~' e V ~ ~ ¢ 5 a ~~ r Pr ,O h:F :' S 5 w' m am ~~~ ~ m..Z c,°°, w w ~~~~ W b'~y ~ ~ ° ~.~ a ~ u 3 d o a 3 w qY~~ v ~ ~ ~ r T w n Q 3 a .~0. O 3 4 o P 3 a vq~ V ~ e a .0 0i S 3 i o O 3 c. ti T 3 a rA~ U °'~ a a n O 3 a e O 3 a a ~ ~ 8 a o m O a 3 o° N W 07 O n LL O N 'Wn V Q a W W N W 0 a Y J S F- Z CO 'G^ V/ U W 7 ,a^ VL/ f Z W W Q a J a a U Q J U cW C W F LL O } h U Ga ~ "s3~ 'E F. g ° ~. ~ ~.~.~ ~ U ~ ~ ~9 ~ $ q a ~ ~ ~ m 9 ~ ^ 6 ~ '~ j ~ ° p V°A ~' ~ O ~ ~ q 'Q '`J l ° g ° G' U 4 ' y g ~ ^ ~ o a a~ ~ 3 w _ ° ~~~ w q ~ ._ ° ` C q ~' 9 o . ~ .°n y .. a_ 3~ 3 i a 3 o O >, .~ r W i ' E y . ~ h , GG~z77 e a 3 . 0 0 '~ m p ~ a o u u B m~ m u ~ ° 'u v °- o '~ a z°. 5 o U~~ a ~ 1 3 m a 3 ° ° ~C ~ c C •~ '~ 3 `4 i' u u C ,~ `a 3 ° ~ "C a~ •Q F°~ ~w~ C°c `Ap `o c ° ui ~a T o > i~9 S `O y W 3 y `°P ° ° G ' C 3 y ° a_ x m C 5 d 3 ° ~~ ° ° a ''~ tl ° w 2 ~ 3 ° ~° 3 ~ _'~, °m C ° o~ ~ ° ~ -' a ° ~ ~ ° ~ ~' `o u _ '. y ;J S vai .^ ~ c b 9 ' e p v° d P L. . U F c 9 ~ r O ~ ~ Y C 2 P 3 w ^ 1- .~ ° AW vl ~ ~ O w O ° w Q V U Y} ° 3 ~ A ~ ° ~ C 1 O C q C ° . .' 'O '@ C y~ T ,' ~~ C .O^ `J ° 9 = a~ 'G ~n ° e - . 3 ~~• '~ 3 '3 .°. r ° ~ m ~a w . a m m a y s u ~ _~ ~ 0 4 ° q ? C ' ~ ~ ~ ° T g -~ C O .a U N i ~ O C ~ ° U O' 9 u °O m m '° V ..y O .`! 'S P. °O, o '~ ~ ~i a ~a ~ ° u> ~.~. y, °~ C U 9 'A '9 •> q O a °~ ° y 'O ~ ~ • y ~ o C ° G ' F U W h 4 b V-. 6 L V 4 G ]^ W e o ~ - 4 .'9 X/ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ 'a U i a o ~ ~ o° ~ G ° ~ ®' ~3 -° 0 °i `2 ~` c ~ S° b 'o ~3 °o' 3 ° ~ ~ m y 5 M ° G ° ~ W q ° i & ~ u 'a ° C ~ p ~ > r u o E ~ ~ P a ° P 4 4 a T ° . 7 J° ` ~3 ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ '~' ~ -_ d v U{~ ~ ° °~ ~ U e ° ° > k .C ' ~ O g > ~ m d 2 u S° ° e ~ ~ w v C o ~ a w " ~ °4 0 ° ~a a , ~ c ~ c ;. ° .~ m 4 ~ 4 F ~ u~ 9 a' ° .A °~ .. .. m U Z ° ~ ~ v o o ' u u 5 3 2a S G ~ °~ a' > m : -°' G a° M ^ 3 ~ a ~ .^ G ~ a u o u t ° O .~ '~ O v~ 'O u o s " ' _ m ~ S ', y { ~ 3 W N W '° .' .p ~ O ~ .- ^y ° L ~ A r 'O _ 1] u ,~ , , _ ° A ~-' Y - . ~ 9 C e ,iJ C~ ~ W tt W 4J a q u aY F *6 N C ~ M~ . 9 VN p .- m C V u o0 ~ y 3 v '~ ~ u~ $ ~ C F W c .Z 'o a ~•a4 m ~ uYxm ~''°'o ua~c a`'vl' x'a ~o ~ ~.:Cm o a~^. a.3 ' q °e ~ G A a.3 V`~ A ?~ a 3.a crLoy FL °~ 7gn 3 ~ 3.,w 3 <n a`a` a5' F °U ~, ~ ~ a 'z a z ss o s a se a ' a e ~ ~ ~ z z z O a '_ U [z7 a .,~ F W 9 ~ .-. °e e ti .-. .. .-. .+ .. a~ ~"4's ~e vo _ ~g o= ~o =a ~8 o= ~o va ~a oa ~o =a sus ~a ~e ea ~g oa `O ~ E °~ .~_. r•I M t^ O ry .~ . ~ H Q O 01 ry O\ r•I P O r1 O P O .yG CJ ~ ~'. ~v e O ^4 . v v v O O a ~ O ~ a ~ y ~~ V L y m ~S' ~ ~ '~ ~'" Cr'•G V ~ C C C4 'C W i ~ V > m c cO x > m ~ / ~ W . ~ V ~'.W - GQ Ca ca d y c~ h cq h a y .a rn gp G ° c~ a ' o P~ ~Vy1 ~° m ° h~ h'i E ~ p vi p E-~ F U ' GG w `° 5 e U n ~ ,~ ° '~ ~` sue-' k .-. a p • O m Y y~ tl u ~ , , m E m v m y ~ °o U ~ ~ ~ ~ m W > Q V .'. i1 p iV m n° a 3 ~ o ~ •~ f1 'J '~ ~ '~ p' ~ a 'e~ ~ .; , [zf :? U ti O o o ~ t ~ a > ~ C ~ W o W y _ .. ~ o U' p' Q _:0, _ G .°. U x ai C W U VI a ..l u o 0 o m ~~ ° q~ S G ~ C C U ~ h ~ v u q.. ~~ ~~ ~~..1Q c ~ °~ ~ o y° ' ~ ad c o ~ y~7 ~ u 'o o a ~o w ~~ mz ~ a~ w~~a u ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~i :i~ 'O ~o'v ° ~°= ~ •° C'o ° o ~ v' g `~ 3 0 7 V 9 a ° o .A W a ,g ~ . c (~ y tr '+ 9 0 ~o~N ti' ~~ ~~ ` ~q ~ ~ _~~~;;. W GGq r~ ~ ~ mo.a ~~ ~ ~~ ha v: d W ~» W F V F U 4C aU ° . 3 ya~l o W C ~ F6 ' 4a0` W U ~Q .:a 2 ' '' z ~ ~~ ~ N ~ n ryi n~i rOi V O ti N ~ ~- O O_ T P Q ~ P ~ 0 O O O O o, a a, a s d ~ a ~ a a a a a a .. _ .. O m 0 a 3 N O N N M' ~ ti W M W Q a O a O w O a O ali I O w O '~ ~. q a ,a:: °" N 3 9 O j ay .°+ y U r O ~ 'a p ~E a b> 5 '5 q N S °°' w 3 3 - . '~ LL O - '3 ~ad m .°. ~3 .3 ~~ °00~ vl a o ° M`o '3 D .°. y O ~ +5 ~ G °' a 'S E k'i 3 a o G ~ c 3 ' ~ :m .qb ~.$ 'y` °ro F a T ~O u ~O; O~ u .p ~ ^~' .~ y ~' t0I O' C~ T U b O O p N .p W ~ ,.~ a, 4 pNrn a h m .pEv.u`o U y~ o E.°p dp c.oa .~ ~? ° o O u 4` ~ n~ Q n° p a W .~ u °r o° o ° v°i E u k .°, y ~ C4 o: e a ° 0 3 ~ v~ u ° `n y' ~ c .a ~a '~ y > ~'~ 3 ry Q .. U' m y~ o d.a v~Ll u U ° :?J`o y o.°'a ~' ,p°^m E >o~ ~ ~ d ~ 6. ~ '3 a u Y ~ ~ m ~ Gq Y 0.. m JJJU °' o• }o~ u U F'' ~ ~ ~ o p m Ud p V: 6 ~ C p ,y C B ~~~ u~u~ ~ o e €,5 j °~3 E., °~d p `o o ~2 Y~' .7.7 'O .°). s A~ F ~ m w~ a V y Ir~ .7 .~ ~ ~.. ~ 5 4 m '3 3 f" ~ , ; h y ~ ~ 9`d w ~ ° •° ~ ~Ok W ~ y ? .o « Q p 9 ~ ~ q '3 y` o ... `u ~ v, [. 9 ~ p O ~ ~ RV p ~ 'u W 7." w`ao3yo~9¢E G~U ~'~ .~ o ~N'3 ~~~~u~ 3•~, .°.33~a ~ U ~ C C O ; U 'J ~ O V q ~ ~ rJ" L Y.q ° O 'p ~ ~ ° ~ .yi ~ V J (n ~ °~ b . m ° S `a o E; :° y 4 u ~ ~ z '3_ a a ° ° ° °~ ° o p ~~ ~ v o ~ ~ 'p o5 N ~y .~N ~ ~ 3 ~ e v° ~ O ~ o m ~ u .a o ~op0 5 ,g A V/ ,. a L. u O 'O ~ ~ (i) U P ~ '~ r. .~ G ~ coal L 4i 7 ~ u ~ ~ `~ N '7 Vl .3 U .O 9 3 ~ ~ p p 'a 'a °. `o a7 p '~' o ~ o .g P 9 0 'S U~ a E P E v E .__ E v V gg /~{ ~ :? .P .P ° h d'a u `~ ~ E d '~l y m °~ y~ 'S 3 ~ 'u ~ u n a .o a. v 9 a °. V ~ ~ pC A U Q T O A E C u .C ° °J aY O 6 W Y u u W Y ~> ~ Y L ~ U p ° QQCt,' o 'oa F°qU U a a ~ Ua as 4l s'a°a:°v, -i 9',L 2. °d Z ° °u 2 2 a ~, Y ~ a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ ~ zz ~z 'z '2 'z 'z Z 'z Zz ~ o _a V. ~ a '' J 2~ W W E "- ,-. Q N ,-. ~. x,1-7 ~ bE ^° d o bE o .. yy a 6° o o a a V Z '~~~ 'o'l .\Ov+ °nti ao ~ oa .°ro bsa Z ~ c ~^~ W ~ ~ ~ N ~ m W ~ E 8 w, x >, ~ ., ° x ° x ., ~ W a;c~ a E E ~x ~ as ~P ., ex "> U 0 a, w . ' ¢ 3 a a c~ ~ c7 ~ ~ 2 a 9 q ~ I- ~' ~ ' m '~ 'x a o W Z ~ W ~.~ ..~ v a m ~ ~ Ee ~ '~ e x ~ w ~ ~ ~ f.A W U pp y u c ° c Q ~ a E °q ~ G~''..a1 ~ u 3 3 G .a E u 5 a a~ ° A rZ p y o u a J U.~o -off ~~~a ~ x~o~ ~~q~s~a y ~ w Q ~~ ~ '~ ~ w t~ `~' ,°'m m 1~,~ °~ y u o E u d M U.. ~ 9 ° ° ~ o W o o ~ `u Ki m ° v ~o .~ `d ° ~ a ~~ ~~~~ ~ a~a~~ ~ ~x~ ~~ a ~~ U ~~ ~FON z m~oo° ~' ~ ' .. ti 3rm~~~ ., au E y C , O y N « ~ e~ w o m '. Ol o ° ~ m o., e Q:. o ~ ° ~ ~ a m~ a. '::0..':: a w 3 n 0 LL O m v s !% 3 a ~ v 'S ~ 9 m q a v L ' 6'r'• '° w ~ $ O O rn F U M S ~ S ~ 6 (~ ~ m 5 ~~ T' r~ a H H u Oa O ~' ,. W m b ° Y~ ~- I o w ,°y 3 3 3 a (7 0.,, ~ ~ o ~ ~ 3 ~ 3 °a ~ ~ o a ~ °o ? ~ ~ > d ~ m m QI, ~ m Q O ~ .~ C 'O ~ .pj' S' ~ ~ [V. ~ ' - ~ a 3 p~ K ~ ~ c c4 > E vj ' ~. ~ O V ap ,9 U A 2 V rn U d U ~~~ O ~m r ~_ g ° y ~.r r~ ~ U 0°5 5 9 v 'y' ~ 2 _ o" 'O 2 ~ ~ U ` 8 ~'' a '~ _ F" ~ U 'o F `n `o o . a~ u W a ~ °° ~a C F m w p° 0 ~"y p o +~ ° .A '~ o y r p 3 0 W W F. O~ T C u ~ 'J V1 F .p V ~ ~ b 'r. d ~ O ~ , , 'O P~+ _ ~ b CJ ~ ° O a n .O N a ? b c~ L ~ .~ ~ C .~ °o N 0o c a " ~o p ~ 6 ¢] . `m C v S :~ v o ~~ o . . u o .~ 9 v .A w° .° W a u m a w ` ~~ ' = ~~~ fA U F ° c : v ^E' ~ 0` u= A p° .~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ m p7.'@ a + u w ~ '@ U @ _ ~e q W ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ } ! S d1 U Jp 6 O~ U T 5 ! .O b p } ! ^.J ^ O y, i {; ~i ~ ° a L~ ~ y a q .J a~ }} . W d ~' $ ~ ~ P a ~ w ~ w E w E b a c ~~ ~ 0. •4 w ~ ~ ~.. ~ w: ' 9 2 gv° a ~ ~ I~ $ ~' o NN ° _'~ '3 ~ oq ~ > al '~3 ~ o '~ W Y Y Y 1 d' >, y> Y ^ V W - m Y G' W m V a w Y Y q p G v~ ~~ b p p° ~ y =~ S °~ O q ~ - 'z z 2 Z Z, v, z ~ z ¢~'m a. Z °Y' a z E'~ Z 0. 'w rL 8 Uw3.~ ,~'p: ¢4'ca3 a ~,~ d d d d d d d C d d d d d d d d d ~ 0.'. U , Q= W W a ~ ^ .. ., .. ~^ m . m . m . F 4 BQ 68 6$ a e B4 8@ b$ ~ e c b$ bE a ~ ~ m d z Z ~ '~ 0 0 w O a~ y.;' o ~ ~ w , ~/ LL N ~ ~ ~ . V Y Cm0 Om0 ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ y U 5 Y V N Y V O U ~ ] -y ~ y ~ { Y Cq C4 k+. U C h G °' w " ~: U V ~• c. ~ F iOG C7 ~ P~ po A pp x p GI Ca G u Ca O z z ~ 0. u u u ~ w + ~ ~ C 9 F. Pi ° t ~ ti ~ ti ~ ~ n :~ ti ~ O ,.W i ~ Y7 r a u p fn 0 ~ 3 Y S w ~ 9 ¢ C ~ E m w ~ ~i. ~ ~ ~' r ~ z ° ~ 5 ~ a W `~ d >' a ° w ~ w ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~= o x ~ z ' = W '~ a ~ ' w O A u, : ~, <7J ~ a F ~ .~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ p sm ~ .. ~ U ~ W ~ a ' L ,.C ~ n ~ e E J ~ ~ m ~ C vpai ~, '~ O ~ ~ ~ w eo o ~ ,y d a J yy ~ U ~ -- w o S ~ ° ~ i~ 3 2 dd 'm b ~ ~ '~ ~ o _~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ° p ~ w ~ y ~ 6 ; ,u ~ O ,. b v '~ ~ ° .` -' a ~= ~ a ~ ~ ~ p U _ .` ~5 ru d u~ u 8 w ~ a~ ti >2 ~ u ~] ~ ~:a ~ tee` `° ~I=I=I=I=ICI-I - I ~ I ., I-11=ICI''>ti 11-I~I ~ I ~ I ~ N ~^~+ v v ~ e ~ `~ 5 a a o m ~,; 3 n T ~ N W ~ a a W W W MO/~ 4~ a Y O J J_ ~ Z ~ ~ W ~ r ~^ O U ~ W H ~ U ~ a Z W W a J a a Q U .. .. .. ..... ~ p SS t V V . Y ~ C. ° ~ ry ~•9 .y y U 9 = Y ~~"jy .~ V O O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ' ° qy T ,. .' u b °° ~ '°~ u fl ~ u u h ti C ° W O. O `o O ~ n eJ m y 'gy'm o ~ ~ E ,. O `~ ~ q ~ j ~ gi 0? y^ e 'p G @ C ° y O U 'L ~ 4 y r3 u u Cf~ ;. o W J sr ~ .gyp, ~py o W m q [~i,~ '~ ° ~ ° „ g € ~ ~ , ° ~ m U :: W ~ c o $ ~ > ~ 3 .u '~ L ~ O ~ o g U F U b r'Si ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ m o W J b ~ ° ~> Q ai r. O T O U ~ qy o O C e a J .. a ~y' ' ' • s e , ~ ~ ,~ - • ~ C O b ~. ' O 4 O ~ 1J py 6m E° 0. ~ .«, O . ~ O Oy ~J N ~ ^ FN O Y N » p U m b O ¢y . m A ' p .: h s e0 P ~ U 5 o ~ m Y P ~` U ~ v Ji (5 u y .. ° p. i.a ° .. ~ __ C .J C ~. '06 T , A ~ ' ~ C i y q '~ °~ ~ ~ c ~ !3q~~ " 0 3 w T o p o ~ ~ b Y U gip~.' ~ p~ ~ > ~ o u ' ~ ~ o ° ~ jy o. v o ' .~' a o .~ ~ ~ ~ S °m o q , ~, W b ' a ~ 2 u O ~ Q' ~ o ~ ~ ~ W U m U b 5 ~ O~ ~ ~ ^ 6 ~ ~ V C 3 e O E' c ! F. d . [~ ] G p C ~ ~ 'b a F y ~` "> ~ c C •~ N .i ~ 'S. > o .m. . 4 o y o b a .q° ~ w S 'A d.' U ~ o ~m o '~ ~+ ° o U o o h W C a :: u v u .° ~O - d m ~O a s G C O m C V Y O m x 'v O u y L q F' ~' L ~, m o i C a o e~ ^ ° ~ z - ~ 3 a . `A ~ 'J 3 ~ u pO. c ` 6 3° ~ c A o U s r ' ~ = ~'' u ~ ~ J ~~ p oo a c - c P. ' -m ~+ o.' w q° `o °90 N WI F C D '3 m 0`2 g O y ~'~aYl u .= °a .. > ~t ~~~ u W cF O m ~ b ~ N = ° M 3 v '~a 'd ~ ° °> ~ ' M ~ n w o m cF" ` ~ W o 0 8 o Q Tai o W m ~ 5 w 9 am ~° o o oF" ~•~ Y~ ~C '~ b a' '~ A e S '~ °u a ° °'~ ~ % o o Q u~ e ~ b ~` $UPv a .-. > . a o o^ v ` o 11 0~ ay '° v ~ 'S ~ m ~ = o u E O_ a. u 2, 3 u O 3 ~.~ d mw c b (, ~ y q °o v ~ A w d m~ O ~ V m ~ O ~ .a c w ~3 ~ W ~ m 2^ O ~F a ~U ~U °.o ~ ^ - a ~ 3i°.. oU.'3S " ' 'f : ' O m y '` . - 3 $ 3 °%¢~ ~ 5 °'r° ~ _ 'm ~ ' ~"~-a o ` n ' ~, ~~ o.E Vl ~ ~o o ~ G as W ._ v, ~ 9 J W u a a a ~ ° ~'' • L W La OI a~m4-, 3 ° . L b ° o u ~ .. .. ~ ° ,~ ,., `~ ° b a : u ~ p o ry, t ~. v o .u . ,~ ~' `~ ~ . _ u r. ° ,. r u ° ~ ~w b ° ° d `~ > ~3 m m ~ $ . p. ~O ~ `~ u p ~a b ~ ° ':. cY. C C b wY' o a 6 U N W o IL N M O d 2 d W O t ~ Ny W Yi ~ o . V m 1 ~ a L4 O U Y. V Vl E+ V F ~ . ~ 4~ 3A F F ~i ~ U ~ ~° ~ d ' d ' d ' d 6 d d ' d d ' d 6 6 d ' ~ : z z z z z z z z z z z z z ~ V °" ' ~ ~T W a ~ a ~ d d m 'o m 'e d d d d d d d d d ~ g ~ ~~ '~ C~ C e z Z~ '~Z~ Z 2 ~ ~Z ~ 'z °e g G 0~ pp O O ~ , U~ : (y `.W .. U Y Y Y pip 4 b Y V b pV Y V Y ~~ A [{~~ [{ t0 tC R Y W 4C W C t0 R ~A R C Y . O.'. C7 ~ 'J' a a Y ° ., ',' , 'J' ~ 'J. ~ a oE _ C' z• ' e e e a e e e a ° ° 0 m . a",:W , , n n n ,a n n n n ~ n n n a c7 .a 2 z'm- 0::~ ~ ~ ~? ~ ° U ~ c4 W y° a. ~ ~ ~ ~a 0 °~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 ,~ o d ~ ~ ; ~ , , c~ ~ ~Q ~ ~~ C ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ s 'Q U 'iVi v ~ a, E o {y x q o L u u ~~~ii O h u 'S VI .. G y~„ 0 LV .~ T O ~n p, ~ d~~ ° G c O ~ a h ~A `C ~ ~ ° u ~o W a $ ~ ~ ' ~ a E °°° m ~ ~ [-~ - v, ° a 13 ~ o L y ~° ' b ~ v' ~,.'~ o e ~ 3 ~ v u ~ N _ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ o s ~~ ~ .s ~ ° ~ ~~ u = a ~ ~ ~:Q, W 0.' c 9 j m m^ W ^~ U o o. ` .e. u 'v m y a M U ~d e`o u ~ D ~O a 3 rL am ~ C ai a . ~ u° ~ S ' 3 ~ a m F ° u `~ o s~. m x =ai z ° m a d y .~ ~ ~,.. ~ ~ y a g s m a, . :< ~~F U e o ' e 0 ' e 0 ' e o ' e e ' e e ' a e ' a o ' `d 'E d 0 ' e o 'C e e 'C ,.n„ G C C C C C C G C a > > > > > > > > > > > > _ a ,. °_: m O to a 3 n 0 LL O O N T n m W O (7 Q a H W W 2 N W C3 O a Y O Q J J ~ ~ Z WO ~ g w , ~~ LL OU } w ~ O U ~ a H Z w w O a J Q H a U 0 m m 0 a 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City FROM: bq(~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: September 5, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report -August, 2001 The following activities were performed by Public Works personnel for the month of August, 2001: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of--way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S. F. VII. STENCILING A. 338 New and repainted legends B. 400 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and Street Maintenance Division in-house concerns 207 6 8 27 1.206 29 13 13.950 27 2.615 :.e•~:; Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 51 service order reequests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 60 service order requests for the month of Julv , 2001. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 72 hours of events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by 5 25.710.00 compared to 3 31.430.00 for the month of Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 $ 20,250.00 $ 5,460.00 $ -0- cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvemei Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvemei Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) which includes standby time, special for the month of August. 2001 was j~(j _ N m m m y ~~a N N ~ ~ O O W U~ag m Z ~~~µ¢a¢µ~~ OUa> f W W y~y 2 ~ LL QOy W ~ O Y CyV7j O 0 aOD m A N N O O~ O p N A M n tC ~~~pp N N O O ~ N N O N pC o0 O H q• O N M O !09 G W A m~ f'! x N q ~pD fD V N ~ O y aD ~ A~ N ~ N N ~p R ~ O O N O tV N h N MA! W p N ~ tC O m ~ p N (p O ND pp p 8 CO p O p ~p O N p O N n q p O O O S m qq N e D ~ ((QO~~ p I ! p N N N ~ ep O o ~ ~ t p S N W Y ~ O ~pp n O V ~ p ~ ~ y ~ ~ N ~ M M y y M N N M H O V `° N p m w Cp O W A J W O ~ U ~_, ~ rtm g g _ i ~ g $ ~ g g' ~ g ~Ni Bpi -' i $ a - $ N ~~ ~ LL s~ p p p p N N •• ~ ~ ~ - p , ppQ , W _ q _N ~e yi N r m b ~ ~=- ' ort. ~xN, N - ':~~ ~ V C p ~ ~O y NN X a Y zsc' ~ , N NON .. ;'.. N M ~ :M V ~ tr ^ ' ~ ~ - .. -. ~ _e _. _ _ ~ . . ~ , y . .. ~' , - S ~O O Mf Ok ~ N' •N y A h W N q m ~ WP .. ^ ~ N ~ a ~ X ~ L • - ~. ~ ~U ,a p'^'s ..: _ „~ _ ~ S O O O O O r O W N ~ O W O !r9 r N C n w w w ~ 9i ~ e a a n~ m w ° ~ a ~ N N N O N A N N CO I~ ~ ~ N y y NN MN N W M p ~ N p M ' W Q `~' O O O m N m n ~ H O m m ~ Ol 9 ~ ~' e~' ~• a C ~ v CI ~ CI p ~~~ W r ~9 ~ r s~ M ~ i' ~ N iq ~~ w ~ O Q ~ ~$ m ~ ~ w ~ z ~ O W J O W O ~ ~ N W ~ a W O W G 2 W W C J ~.7 FQQ- 2 V G Q U M ' a ~ _ {y ~ N Q Y = a W ~ O = W ~ ~ 2 ? d' ? F W C9 NW ~ W U S d a = Z Z y 1 ~, 2 a s K W a t ~ Z W q Q R C ~ ~ O O Q N tl 1 U' D Z M 4' F ~~~ m ~~~ ~~. ~~~ ~~~ 0 W F a~ o~ Ug~g gKgF 3~ W T V J L.1 W ~ z" < ~ o~.'S8 -- o o' 1G a .... m ~°° 8 '°° E ~ N { 00 8 0 ^o n ~~ 8 0 ~ ~ e~ ~ LL ~ O s JI e ~ ~Y $$g M g uauaaa ~ ~ 55 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b 3 U S y ~ Qm„-R~~~,~m '> "' 2 R map°~~RB~X q r n v B a ~~~g~ pU @ K- N iIS~~CZ~fTi (~ STREET MAINTENANCE The following contractors have performed the following projdcts for the month of August, 2001 DATE ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEUBRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST SIZE CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Date: 08/07/01 CITYWIDE RO. W. DIRT SHOULDER GRADING # 5402 "- TOT FIL COST $ 7,000.00 CONTRACI'ORE RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT ,_ Date: 08/2001 # 5402 CITYWIDE WE LIT RO. D SPRAYING, WEED ABATEMENT AND ER /DEBRIS REMOVAL FROM CITY W.S. TOT AL COST $ 13,250.00 CONTRACTOR:. BECKER ENGINEERING Date: 08/13/01 1) TRADEWATERATTEMEKU AT HUMEER 1) RI 2) R &RPCCSPANDREL & R #301 DRAIN # 5402 2) TVHS AT RANCHO VISTA TO AL COST $ 5,925.00 Date: 08115/O1 RANCHO VISTA NORTH OF EL GRECO R & ~-F kt V-DITCH AND CONSTRUCT TRANSITION T # 5401 TOT AL COST $ 5,460.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 5,460.00 $20,250.00 - 0 - CITY OF TEMECUIIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIGi WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF AUGUST, DATE ` RECEIVED LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 08/01/01 41565 CORTE SEDA SLUR RY CONCERN 08/01/01 08/01/01 41538 AVENIDA DE LA REINA ROO T PRUNE 08/01/01 08/01 /Ol 31762 LOMA LINDA ROAD DEBR IS CLEAN-UP 08/01 /Ol O8/01/O] 28065DIAZROAD SINK I-TOLE 08/01/Ol 08/02/01 29720 MONTE VERDE ROO T PRUNE 08/02/01 OS/03/01 32079 VIA BONILLA PAIN T SPILT, 08/03/01 08/03/01 DEL REY ROAD AT AVENIDA BARCA TREE DOWN 08/03/01 08/06/01 41886 PACIFIC GROVE SAND IN STREET 08/06/0] 08/06/01 31345 HURON STREET DOWN 08/06/01 08/06/01 41585 ZINFANDEL I TRIM 08/06/01 08/07/01 43551 SANFERMIN S.N.S MISSING 08/07/01 08/08/01 30291 TRADEWATER COURT SETT ING WATER 08/08/01 08/08/01 40465 BRDCTON CIItCLE WAX ON CURB 08/08/01 08/08/01 33156 CALLS MII2APOSA CAT H BASIN CLEANING 08/08/01 08/0801 30291 TRADEWATER P.C.C REPAII2 08/08/01 08/10/01 30484 MILKY WAY ROO PRUNE O8/10/Ol 08/10/01 DIAZ AT ZEVO DRIVE MISS G MANHOLE COVER 08/10/01 08/13/01 28495 FRONT STREET TRIPf ~ING HAZARD 08/13/01 08/] 3/01 41190 VIA CIELITO STOR M DRAIN CLEANING 08/13/01 08/14/01 39767 OAK HII,LS LOST LICENSE PLATE 08/14/01 08/15/01 30165 CORTE CARRIZO TREE TRIIvIN1II4G 08/15/01 08/15/01 31401 CORTE MADERA UND R SIDEWALK CLEANIG 08/15/01 OS/15/Ol 40330 CAMINO CAMPOS VERDE DEBR IS PICK-UP 08!15/Ol DATE RECEIVED LOCATION ~ REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 08/15!01 30165 CORTE CARRIZO TREED TRIlvIIvIING 08/15/01 08/16/01 41701 RIESLING COURT ROO PRUNING 08/]6/01 08/17!01 41701 RIESLING COURT I ROOT PRUNING 08/17/01 08/17/01 27468 JON CHRISTIAN STO DRAIN CLEANING 08/17/01 08/17/01 32505 GALANTINA OII. S PII.L 08/17/01 08/17/01 39839 LONGLEAF P.C.C CRACKING 08/17!01 08/17/01 29611 NIGHTCREST DEBR IS PICK-UP 08/17/01 08/20/01 45566 MASTER DRIVE P.C.C~ REPAIR 08/20/01 08/20/01 41831 5"` STREET TREE DOWN 08/20/01 08/21/01 31063 CORTEALOMAR TREEi TRIM1vIING 08/21/01 08/22/01 29923 MIltA LOMA DRIVE STAN DING WATER 08/22/01 08!22/01 31968 CORTE SOLEDAD TREE TRIIvIIvIItQG 08/22/01 08/22/01 40695 CALLE TORCIDA TREE TRIIvAiIIIQG 0822/01 08/23/01 AVALON MANAGEMENT TREE TRIM[vv1B1G 08/23/01 08/23/01 28950 FRONT STREET POTH OLE 08/23/01 08/23/01 45505 OLYMPIC WAY CATC H BASIN CLEANING 0823/01 0823/01 VIA DOS PICOS DEBR IS PICK-UP 0823/01 0824/01 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER R-1 M ISSING 0824/01 0824/01 41995 KAFFIItBOOM ROOT PRUNING 0824/01 08/27/01 760 SUGAR PIlVE STREET POT OLE 0827/01 0827/01 40505 CALLE KATERINE CAT H BASIN CLEANING 0827/01 08/28/01 29836 VII.LA ALTURAS I CATC H BASIN CLEANING 08/28/01 08/28/01 SOLANA WAY AT ARANDA G I ITI 0828/01 0828/01 43384 VIA ANGELES DEBR IS PICK-UP 0828/01 08/29/01 30260 TRADEWATER DEB SPICK-UP 08/29/01 08/29/01 30375 SENELA PLACE TREE CONCERN 08/29/01 08/30/01 30371 FALCON POINT COURT LOCK MISSING ON GATE 08/30/01 08/30/01 43310 CORTE ALMERIA STAN DING WATER 08/30/01 TOTAL SERVI E ORDER REQUESTS Sl CITY OF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFTTI REMOV. MONTH OF AUGUST,2001 DATE LOCATION ~ WORK COMPLETED 8/02/01 OAK HII,L DRIVE REMOVED 450 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/03/01 RANCHO VISTA AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/08/01 RIESLING AT VINEYARD REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFTTI 08/14/01 33404 CORTE MANGARINO REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI O8/15/01 I-15 AT OVERLAND BRIDGE REMOVED 176 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/15/01 MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 380 S.F. OF GRAFFTTI 08/]6/01 27471 YNEZ REMOVED 232 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/16/01 LA SERENA AT MWD EASTMENT REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/16/01 PIMA COLADA AT DEL REY REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/601 SOLANA AT DEL REY REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/16/01 40291 TANAGIER REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/17/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HUMBER REMOVED 420 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/17/01 CORTE MANGARINO REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/21/01 LA SERENA PARK REMOVED 74 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/21/01 29676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFTTI 08/21/01 YNEZ AT TOWN CENTER SO. REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/21/01 NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY AT NICOLAS REMOVED 350 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/21/01 NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY AT CITY LIMITS REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/23/01 28950 FRONT STREET REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/24/Ol VIA DOS PICO REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/24/01 PAUBAATMEADOWS REMOVED 30 S.F.OFGRAFFITI 0824/Ol AKES PASS AT LINALOU RANCH REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 0827/01 SOLANAATARANDA REMOVED 30 S.F.OFGRAFFITI DATE ,. - :< LOCATION, WORK COMPLETED 0827/01 DEL REY AT CALLE PINA COLADA REMOVED 24 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/28/01 PROMENADE CHARDONNAY AT PLACER REMOVED 48 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/28/01 PROMENADE CHARDONNAY AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 08/29/01 SOLANA AT CALLE ARANDA REMOVED 225 S.F. OF GRAFFTTI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 2.615 TOTAL LOCATIONS 27 O w l O ~^T 1, O N O O O O O M N N r r O a U W O O Z t- V O a W y b 7 Q J 7 W 2 a a a m LL Q O ~+ *I I H V T ,-, h ~n~ ~ N ~ ti ~" ,..; r d o, N us L ~~ ~Y o oA o F F" W mUU Ji !n ~n.o vi ~o~o h~, _ %l~'N f~"pf NV~vIN ".-. t~O Vi OTC ~~ ' lppr OO ~(Oa `D ~b <Nr N O`O 00 ;~ N y~ N'l~ ~ [+1 N b9 `FVfY41 Vf 6A 69 fA b9 fA ~y 69 y9~ CITY OF TEMECUI~r1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISIONI RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE MONTH OF AUGUST, DATE- LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 08/01/01 41951 CAMINO CABANA TRIIvIMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 08/01/01 MEADOWS PARKWAY AT PAUBA TRIIvIIviED 1 R.O.W. TREES 08/01/01 32028 CAMINO MAREA TRIIvIMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 08/08/01 32037 VINEYARD TRIIvIIvIED 2 R.O.W. TREES 08/08/Ol RIESLING AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 08/09/01 BRIXTON ATRIVERTON TRIIv1IvfED 8 R.O.W. TREES 08/14/0] 44882 TEHACHAPI TRIMIv1ED 1 R.O.W. TREES 08/15/01 SPYGLASS AT MEADOWS TRIMIvIED 1 R.O.W. TREES 08/15/01 MEADOWS PARKWAY AT CAFERA TRIIvIIvIED 1 R.O.W. TREES 08/22/01 31082 CORTE ALAMAR TRIMIvIED 2 R.O.W. TREES 08/28/01 REDHAWKATOVERLAND TRIIvIIvfED 2 R.O. W. TREES 08/29/01 CALLE ARANDA AT CATERA TRIMIv1ED 1 R.O.W. TREES 08!29/01 27512 ENTERPRISE CIItCLE WEST TRIIvIMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 08/29/01 RUSTIC GLEN TRIMIvfED 1 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL RO.W. TREE ES TRIMMED 27 CITY OF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / MONTH OF AUGUST, DATE LOCATION ~ WORK COMPLETED 08/01/01 PAUBA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY REPAINTED 24 LEGENDS 08/06/01 VAIL RANCH SCHOOLS REPAINTED 48 LEGENDS 08/06/01 VAII. RANCH SCHOOLS REPAINTED 380 L.F. GREEN CURB 08/08/01 VAII. RANCH SCHOOLS REPAINTED 28 LEGENDS 08/09/01 LA SERENA AT MARGARITA REPAINTED 24 LEGENDS 08/13/01 PALOMA DEL SOL REPAINTED 36 LEGENDS 08/14/01 AREA #3 REPAINTED 28 LEGENDS 08/15/01 AREA #3 REPAINTED 38 LEGENDS 08/24/Ol RANCHO CALIF. ROAD AT I-15 FREEWAY SOUTHBOUND REPAINTED 20 L.F. OF RED CURB 08/27/01 AREA#I REPAINTED 41 LEGENDS 08/28/Ol AREA #5 REPAINTED 38 LEGENDS 08/29/Ol AREA #4 REPAINTED 33 LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAIN NEW & REPAINTED R>] TED LEGENDS 338 D CURB & STRIPING LF. _~ CITY OF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MONTH OF AUGUST, DATE LOCATION 1 WORK COMPLETED 08/07/01 VINEYARD AT ZINFANDEL CLE I D & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 08/09/01 MARGARITA AT HWY 79 SO. CLEA NED c@, CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 08/14/01 CAMINO RUBANO CLEA NED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 08/16/01 31401 CORTE MADERA CLEA NED ~ CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 08/20/01 27600 JEFFERSON CLEA NED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS 08/27/01 40505 CALLS KATERINE CLEA NED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 08/27/01 45505 OLYMPIC WAY CLEA NED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANE D & CHECKED 13 CITY OF TEMECUI~A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF AUGUST, DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 08/01/01 JOSEPH ROAD NORTH OF NICOLAS ABATED 450 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS 08/02/01 JOSEPH ROAD AT RITA WAY ABATED 1,200 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS 08/10/01 JOSEPH ROAD AT RITA WAY ABATED 11,900 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS 08/22/01 JEFFERSON AT WINCHESTER ABATED 400 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS A BATED 13 50 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC~f WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) MONTH OF AUGUST, DATE LOCATION S COPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL TONS 08/06/01 JEFFERSON AT BIANCHI R & R A.C. 250 6.5 08/07/01 JEFFERSON ATBIANCHI A.C~ CAP 345 6.5 08/08/01 JEFFERSON AT BIANCHI R ~@ R A.C. 215 6.5 08/09/01 JEFFERSON AT BIANCHI A.C CAP 215 3 08/13/01 MARGARITA NORTH OF WINCHESTER REPI AIIt POTHOLES 83 2 08/14/01 VAII, RANCH REPI rAIR POTHOLES 58 2 08/15/01 YNEZNORTHOFWINCHESTER R& RA.C. 32 1.5 O8/15/01 30078 MII2A LOMA R & R A.C. 8 I TOTAL S.F. OF R TOTAL TONS EPAIItS 1.206 29 CITY OF DEPARTMENT OF ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF AUGUST, DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 08/01/01 AREA#3 REP LACED 25 S.N. S. 08/01/01 CAMINO MAREA AT CALLS JABII.I REP LACED 2 R-1 FADED 08/02/01 DIAZ AT WINCHESTER REP LACED R-26 T.C. 08/03/01 RANCHO VISTA AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD REP LACED R-I FADED 08/03/01 AREA#3 REP LACED 9 S.N.S. 08/03/01 END OF SERAPHINA INST ALLED 2 "N" MARKERS 08/06/01 CALLS ARAGON AT AVENIDA DE LA REINA REP LACED R-1 FADED 08/06/01 AREA#2 REP LACED 24 S.N.S. 08/07/O] AREA #2 REP LACED 20 S.N.S. 08/07/01 ZINFANDEL AT CHENIN BLANC REP LACED R-26 08/07!01 MARGARITA AT JEDEDIAH SMITH REP LACED R-26 08/08/01 CALLS BAHA VISTA AT AVENIDA DE LA REINA REP LACED R-1 FADED 08/08/01 AREA #2 REP LACED 12 SNS 08/09/01 2994] AVENIDA CIIdA DEL SOL INS ALLED R2 25 08/09/0] RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HUMBER REP LACED TYPE K MARKER 08/13/01 DIAZ AT WINCHSTER REP ~,ACED R26 08/13/01 END OF SERAPHINA INS ~ ALLED `N' MARKER, W31 08/13/01 VAIL RANCH REP ACED 2 R-1, W-17, N41, 45 R250 08/14/01 VAII. RANCH REP CED 2W63, W65, R2-25, W56 O8/15/01 DIAZ NORTH OF WINCHESTER REP ACED R26 08/15/01 VA1L RANCH REP LACED W-7, 4 W-54, K MARKER, 2 W66 08/]6/01 VAII. RANCH REP LACED W66, W54, W65, K MARKER, R-7 08/17/01 VAIL RANCH REP LACED W-66, W-66A, W-65, W63, R-1 08/20/01 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT WELTON INS ALLED "C" PKG. DATE" k LOCATION WORK-COMPLETED 08!20/01 BUTTERFIII.D STAGE AT WOLFSTORE ROAD REP LACED R-1 MISSING 08/20/01 VAIL RANCH REPi LACED W-63, "C" PKG. 08/21/01 NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY AT CITY LIMITS REPi LACED 3 R-1 GRAFFITI 08/21/01 VAII. RANCH REPi LACED W63, W66A, W66, W65 08/22/01 CORTE ALAMAR REPi LACED 9 R30A 08/22/01 VAILRANCH REPi LACED W53, W41, W-11 08/23/01 DIAZLOWFLOW REP LACED DELINEATOR 08/23/Ol MARGARITA NORTH OF WINCHESTER REPI LACED 6 DELINEATORS 08/23/01 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN REP LACED 6 DELINEATORS 08/23/01 WALCOTT REP LACED 6 CARSONITES 08/23/Ol LA SERENA AT MEADOWS REP LACED 2 DELINEATORS 08/23/01 NICOLAS REI~ LACED 2 R2 45 08/24/01 PAUBA AT LOMA LINDA REPi LACED R2 "50" 08/28Po1 VAII, RANCH REPI LACED Rl, Rl-A, W-17, R2 45, K MARKER, W-41, R-7 08/29/01 27512 ENTERPRISE CII2CLE WEST REPI LACED R2 25 08/29/01 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN INS TALL 2 W-63 08/31/01 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN REPI LACED 4 DELINEATORS TOTAL SIGN TOTAL SIGN TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 207 INSTALLED 6 REPAIRED 8 APPRO CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUI.E AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Howard Windsor, City Fire Chief DATE: September 17, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Councils Monthly Activity Report for the month of August, 2001. and filing is the Fire Departments R:6Sbfr FoWefabbmannbVrbMhly Activity Report 20011SfaR Repoli - Shell.tloc Response Statistics for AUGUSTj, 2001 Structure Fire 8 7 10 4 29 210 Vegetation Fire 17 8 6 7 38 121 Vehicle Fire 6 5 1 1 13 81 Fire -Other 2 4 0 2 8 85 Medical Aid 65 56 47 99 267 2088 Traffic Collisions 21 34 6 20 81 540 Fire Menace Standby 7 2 2 3 14 96 Public Service 4 11 8 9 32 172 Hazmat 0 1 0 0 1 N/A Ringing Alarm 28 37 9 ~ 21 95 187 TOTAL 158 165 89 166 578 N/A' Assists/Covers N/A 0 N/A 11 N/A N/A Responses Outside of the City 54 32 N/A ~ 40 N/A N/A • Due to changes to statistic format and items recorded, the YTD total will nd Medic Squad 84 Response Statistics Me Medical Aids 178 1386 Aver a R t be accurate. dic Squad 84 Time Statistics es once Time 5.3 N/A Traffic Collisions 55 346 Lon est R es once Time 18 N/A Public Service Assists 6 45 Medic Sq ~ ad Cancelled Fire Menace Standby's 3 16 Prior to P 'ent Contact 77 661 Structure Fires 6 55 Average W ait Time for Rin 'n Alarm 26 207 AMR 4.43 N/A V etation Fire 3 8 Medic Squ ad on Scene Vehicle Fire 1 7 Prior to A MR -Medical Refuse Fire 2 10 Aids and Traffic Collisions 120 761 Hazmat 0 5 Performed 'ALSpriorto TOTAL 280 2085 AMR's A~ rival 30 308 'ALS -Advanced LitB Support Fire Prevention Personnel 0 -Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal 3 -Fire Safety Specialist 1 - Captain/Deputy 3 -Fire System Fire Plan Check Marshal 1 -Office Technician III Fire Plan Check Buildin TI 27 185 Fire Plan Check Building 28 129 Fire Plan Check Misc. 25 212 Fire Under Ground Water Plan Check 11 72 Fire Over or Under Ground Tank Plan Check 0 5 Fire S rinkler NCOM Plan Check 13 75 Fire S rinkler TI Plan Check 9 75 Fire Hood Duct Plan Check 2 18 Fire S ray Booth Plan Check 0 3 Fire S ecial Su ression Plan Check 0 1 Fire Alarm Plan Check g 72 Planning Case Plan Review 16 172 Fire Code Permits 0 6 TO ~'AL 139 1025 Fire Prevention Fire Inspection Fire Prevention Final 12 139 Fire Prevention Shell 4 89 Fire-Underground H dro 7 31 Fire Thrust Block 4 33 Fire Over Head H dro 7 74 Fire Flow 1 4 Fire Flush 2 21 Fire S rinkler Final 11 98 Fire Weld Ins ection 3 21 Fire Hood Duct Final 5 18 Fire Pre- Wire 1 38 Fire Alarm Final 4 87 Fire S ra Booth Final 0 3 Fire Safet Ins ection 6 74 Fire State Mandated Ins edion 0 13 Fire S ecial Events Ins ection 1 27 Fire Pi in H dro 0 1 Fire Shear Valves 0 2 Fire Over/Under Tank Final 0 5 Fire S ecial Su ression S stem 0 1 Fire S ecial Pro ect Investigations 0 0 Fire Administrative -Meetings etc... 0 N/A Fire Misc. Ins ections 2 15 Engine Co. Follow U Enforcement 1 4 TOTAL 71 798 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcemerit and miscellaneous activity occurring during August of 2001. The Police Department responded to tj~irty-two "priority one" calls for service during the month of August, with an average response time of approximately 7.1 minutes. A total of 3,426 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. Police services continued within the Vail Ranch area during t e month of August. This consisted of both routine patrol and dedicated patrol activities. During the month, a total of 103 calls for police service were noted. The majority of these calls were for non-criminal activity followed by traffic issues. During the month of August, the Temecula Police Departure total of 251 customers. Fingerprinting services for this mont people filed police reports, twenty-three people had citations permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanen events and community oriented programs during the month gate code verifications for six housing communities, four apa storage facilities. He also ~rovided a tour of the station facilit Grand Jury on August 16` . Additionally, Officer Fanene as Family Employee picnic on Sunday, August 11 `". Officer Fang business and residential alarm calls and coordinated with the to resolve the false alarms and the unnecessary ensuing re: it's Town Center storefront served a showed sixty prints taken, forty-one igned off and nine oversized vehicle participated in a number of special Officer Fanene completed monthly tment complexes, one park and five to members of the Riverside County fisted in the yearly City of Temecula ne also continued to handle problem rcoperty/business owners in an effort ~onse by officers. The POP Team continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. At this time there is 70% compliance with this program across the City and they are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify four cc program. The team continued their Warrant Apprehensic resulted in one felony warrant arrest and five misdemeanor plexes that are continuing with the Program during the month, which errant arrests. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 The POP Team continued with their proactive patrol efforts three misdemeanor arrests during the month of August. made two felony arrests and twenty- The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP term and a location to assist the public with police services. This has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. During August, the Old Town storefront served about a hundred customers, taking fingerprints, writing police reports and signing off citations. The traffic team reported that during the month of August there were 503 citations issued for hazardous violations, 229 citations were issued for non-ha~ardous violations and 181 parking citations were issued. During the month there were thirteen injury traffic collisions, forty-one non- injurycollisions were reported and twenty-six drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERACIT program this month led to the arrest of one subject. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in sixty-nine citations being issued. This p jogram addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The SLAP program (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in eighty-five citations being issued. During the month of August, the POP officers assigned to thb Promenade Mall handled a total of 141 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the month, calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on ten misdemeanors and two felony cases for various offenses. Three citations were also issued. Officers Robles and Rupe continued to provide training to security staff employees durin~ the month. The mall officers worked on vehicle theft and burglary programs during the month because two vehicle thefts and two vehicle burglaries were reported. The posse also increased their presence around the mall on weekends with frequent patrols of the parking areas. The school resource officers continued to remain active duringAugust. Officer Kubel conducted two elementary school presentations. The topics of those presentations were "Meet the SRO" and "School Safety." Additionally, a presentation by Officer Gosson the SRO Program also occurred. They also conducted counseling sessions with students. Officer Goss made one felony arrest for receiving stolen property. No other arrests were made during the month. School resource officers assisted in planning, and attended a conference at Chaparral High School during August for area and state school resource officers. The presentation lasted th jee days and featured instructors from various disciplines as presenters. Approximately 150 people attended the conference, which was viewed as a success by all who participated. Officer Bill Rahn replaced Officer Haar at the Temecula Valley High School campus and is settling in well in his new assignment. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Prog~am) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. Officer Sherry Adams conducted the seventy-first Youth Court session on August 2ntl. The JOLT officer assisted at other s ~ hoots when needed and conducted follow-ups with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. Offi~er Adams continued to work with "At Risk" juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. She also assisted the District Attorneys Office and the Probation Department by providing training during home visits with incorrigible juveniles. Officer Adams made a misdemeanor arrest during August. During the month of August, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and John Morin handled a total of twenty-five cases. These cases resulted intwenty-three misdemeanor and eleven felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. They also issued forty-one citations for various violations. These officers conducted two search warrants that ~esulted in fourfelony arrests and five misdemeanor arrests. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 the city on apro-active basis. During this month the team w offenders and conducting parole and probation searches. As recovered quantities of methamphetamineavd marijuana. s involved with registering narcotics result of these programs the officers Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer uric Albert and assistant coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 396 hours of service in August. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance, and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are adc available to the police department. The police department patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 246 hoi specifically spent on patrol in Temecula). itional valuable volunteer resources atilizes reserve officers to assist with enforcement and a variety of special rs during the month (140 hours were APPROV CITY ATTORNEY DIItECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Economic Development Monthly Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordi The following are the recent highlights for the Economic of August 2001. Leads 8 Inquiries In the month of August, the City received 2 leads and Japanese restaurant and a cabinet business. in the month of August, the Southwest Riverside Cou from the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) As a result of advertising efforts, the Alliance received 11 from personal inquiries and brochure response cards. Attached is a copy of their activity report. Film Leads & Highlights Report Department for the month inquiries. The leads included a Alliance responded to 6 leads behalf of the City of Temecula. uiries. In addition, 5 leads came In the month of August, the Film Council received 1351 phone calls regarding the Film Festival and 8 calls regarding locations information requests. Maior Studio Contacts ABC TV was filming in wine country. Flying Tiger Productions requested information on filming in Temecula and was given a permit packet with local photos. Keith Warn of Ibex Productions arranged for a sneak preview of his film "Sorority Girl's Revenge" at the Movie Experience on August 26'". This ovie was filmed in and around the Temecula area and starred the former Miss Temecula Rodeo. Please refer to the attached Film Council report for RiWdnickg\DEPT REPOR'IS\Sryt'UI Deyc Rcpt.docCITYMGR\WOLNICKG\ALIGUSTOODPPT.REPTDOC activities. Media/Community Outreach Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter titled, "City Unveils Web-based Geographic Information System (GIS) Public Information Application." The program was unveiled at the August 28'h City Council meeting. Thi§ GIS program enhances the City's public information capabilities and is accessible from the City's web page. Staff provided information to Neighbor's magazine for their September issue. This local magazine is distributed to residents on a monthly basis. The City section highlights new projects, city events, city website information, traffic update and Mayor's column. Meetings Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Business Relations Committee meeting on August 2"d. Company contacts and follow-up action reports were given. Committee members were assigned company visits for the following month. Staff attended the Murrieta Temecula Group Meeting on August 3rd. Speakers Ann Mayer, District 8 of Cal Trans, and George Dickson, Associate Director of Riverside County Transportation spoke on the topic of "Road Infrastructure." Staff met with Mike Wilson of Temeka Advertising development issues. Mayor Comerchero, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and staff August 7'h and 27th to discuss incentives on a potential e~ Alan Nunez, Coldwell Banker real estate broker, met business incentives for a prospective hi-tech employer. August 7'h regarding building with a local manufacturer on ion for the company. staff on August 7d' to discuss Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Meeting on August 8'h. The Alliance will be entering an agreement with GIS Planking to develop a customized GIS program for the Southwest Riverside Country region. Updates were given on upcoming trade shows, on the status of the CD Rom and Economic Profile. Plans and format for future Broker Breakfast Meetings were also discussed. On August 13"' staff attended a preliminary walk through of the Mitsubishi Motors site, located on Jefferson, with Mike Grater, the owner of Mitsubishi Motors, and his service manager. The dealership opened late August. Staff met with a representative of Mount San Jacinto College on August 17"' regarding future college plans. Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting on August 16'". Topics discussed included County Redistricting, Energy Audit Project, Pro-Business Campaign and updates were given on Energy Issues and RCIP. During the month of August, staff met numerous times on Staff attended a "Tilt-Up" Open House on August 14th Park Drive project, which was put on by Coldwell Banker. Roripaugh Ranch development the Rancho Way and Business R:\W"Inickg\DEPT AFPORIS\SepL'01 Peps Rept_docCll'YMGR\WOLMCICG4L000STWDFPTREPTOOC 2 Staff and the Alliance partners attended a lunch meeting with consultant Ron Nater on August 16'". The focus of the lunch was on marketing Southwest Riverside County to high-tech businesses located in the Silicon Valley. Staff attended a lunch meeting on August 2181 with Stevie Field, Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance, and Dennis Frank of UCR regarding the UCR CONNECT program and the Economic Alliance activities. The meeting also included discussion on bringing venture capital groups to the Southwest Riverside County area. On the 28~' of August, staff met with Bill Kipp regardi g a possible 21-acre mixed-use residentiaUsenior housing project A possible site for the VFW was also discussed. On August 28'", staff from the Economic Development and (Planning Departments met with the City's counter techs to advise them on how to handle inquiries for potential businesses. Both departments provided the techs with handouts and literature to pass along to the potential clients. Loopnet was also demonstrated so that the techs can provide information on properties for sale and lease upon request. TOURISM Media Event Mayor Comerchero and staff attended the Temecula V Festival VIP & Media Event at Tower Plaza on August O'Grady spoke on behalf of the City. Medial Outreach Materials Staff met several times during August with Group Connections to continue work on the Tourism CD Rom Staff provided City ads for the Fall Rod Run and Film & International Film & Music Mayor Comerchero and Jim Productions and Mukimedia Festival's event programs. The City's Tourism Rack Brochure received a first place 3CMA award. The rack brochure is distributed in rack service in San Diego, Orange County, I~alm Springs, Phoenix and included in the City's press kit. The brochure is also distributed a~ tourism trade shows. 3CMA is a City/County Communications and Marketing Association based in Washington D.C. Trade Shows/FAM Tours On August 2T", staff met with Maggie Allen of the Film Council regarding enhancing the City's trade show booth. The City will be able to utilize some of the props from the Film Council's display. The City will include this display at the upcoming Group Tour Live Trade Show in October. Staff ordered additional photos to represent a broader range of our tourism attractions. Staff, representatives of the Chamber Tourism Committee and Film Council will participate at the Group Tour Live Trade Show at the Ontario Conv ntion Center on October 28 - 29. Qual~ed tour operators, travel agents and group leaders ere brought together for atwo-day planning and informational event. Staff attended the Chamber FAM Tour Committee The event is scheduled for October 20 - 21. The which was held on August 29th. sent out invitations to 75 travel A\Wolvic6'g\DEPTREPORTS\Sept.'01 Dept Reps.docCl'fYMGR\WOLNICKGUUGUSTOODEPT REPTDOC writers with a second mailing to follow. The itinerary is cgnfirmed. Staff is coordinating with Temecula Creek Inn on the Saturday evening festivities. Meetings Staff attended the Inland Empire Tourism Council Board' Meeting on August T°. Discussion items included a review of the IETC By-laws, membership packages, IEIBA Tourism Council, and planning a tourism luncheon during National Tourism Week in 2002. On August 21" staff attended a presentation on the San Diego's 2002 Sales 8 Marketing Plan put on by the San Diego Convention & Visitors Bufeau. The presentation included an overview of the tourism industry, target markets, and key strategies of San Diego CONVIS. The City of Temecula is a member and receives many benefits flour this active organization. Staff met with Jeffrey CooperSmkh of the Lord Cukural Resources Planning & Management Group on August 27"'. This marketing consultant has been retained by the Pechangas to conduct a market analysis of a possible Cull~kural Tribal Center/Museum, which will be owned and operated by the Pechangas. The size and exact nature of the museum has not been etermined and could range from a relatively small museum to primarily serving the Southwes~ Riverside County area to a "world class" facility. The location would be on Pechanga property, and several sites an; under consideration with the Boseker property, toward SR79 South, as the location that the consultant thought was preferred. Staff provided the consultant with information on our marketing programs, basic information about our historical museum, the plans for the children's museum and performing arts theater, as well as the Vail Ranch historic buildings. Staff will be cor~tatting Gary Dubois of Pechanga in early November to follow-up on the status of the project ahd at that time will also convey our interest in cooperating with them on joint marketing. ATTACHMENTS Temecula Valley Chamber of CommE Economic Development Corporatit Activities Report Southwest Riverside County Econorr Inland Empire Economic Partnership Temecula Valley Film Council Activiti e Activities Report of Southwest Riverside County Alliance Activities Report :tivities Report Report R1wolnickg~DEPi neroa~~ssep~. ni n~a. rtw~..e«cm~acrz~wou~nc~cuuwusroooFrr.rtFrrmc 27450 Phone (909) September 10, 2001 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as Temecula. This is the month of August at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights: In the month of August, 15 businesses reyuested information on in Temecula. They received a business packet, which includes a demographic, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, e Committee Highlights: Road, Suite 124 t, CA 92591 • Fax (909) 694-0201 ~~~rYS SEP t a 2Qr?r I ~ FF~E~R,S our contract with the City of Jr~~% ig or relocating their business of the City of Temecula • Tourism & Visitors Council: Committee members went onan informative tour of Old Town Temecula. The tour included all aspects of the history and personal knowledge of the Temecula Mercantile, First National Bank of Temecula, Machado's Sto~e and information on the future site of the Community Theater and Children's Museum. FAM Tour Task Force leaders are coordinating the Fall Fam our, "Escape to Temecula", scheduled for October 20 and 21, 2001. Trave( Writers and edia guest's will experience first- hand the many things Temecula has to offer wineries, cultural arts, museum, Old Town, outdoor facilities, shopping, farmers market, golfing, hot-air ballooning, special events and the history of our valley. • Education Committee: Members of the committee attended VUSD's K-5 Principals Meeting to inyuire how the Chamber members could aid in support. a committee will discuss various ways to help at the next education meeting. • Ways & Means Committee: This year's Monte Carlo Extravaganza will be Wednesday, September 19, 2001 at Wilson Creek Winery from 5:30pm - 8:30pm. This year's sponsors include Toyota of Temecula Valley and Community National ~ank. Tickets are available now for $20 and you will receive an opportunity to win $1,000 cash! has been scheduled for October 17, 2001 at Pechanga Entcrt: 8:30pm. Community Little Book has agreed to be this year'; in the planning stages of the 2002 Installation event, which v Entertainment Center. Local Business Promotions Committee: The Local Busir, Jaszcar from the Inland Empire Small Business Developme. services he and the organization provide at the August court make a presentation of advertising venues at the September currently recruiting participants for the November Shop Tet the logo is under consideration. Government Action Committee: Senator Haynes and As presentations to over seventy individuals at the Good Morr August 9, 2001 at Callaway. The Government Action Con supporting AB 901 (Daucher) Water Supply Planning. AB management plans that provide for efficient water use, recl water quality as an influential factor. The committee is cut Chamber members for the Candidates Forum scheduled on Pro-Business Campaign task force will hold a press confen point presentations will be made at local organizations to e~ vote. • Membership Committee: A successful Mixer was held at'1 2001 with over 400 guests in attendance. The September Me. encouraging everyone to become a "Chamber Mentor" by sp the next Roundtable Discussion on September 7, 2001 11:30 Temecula. • Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) Activity Report: • 320 Visitor Guides and 320 Winery Brochures to Parkcrest C congregation members attending a conference at Calvary Bib • 225 Visitor Guides, 200 Winery Brochures and 20 Temecula TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center for distribution to tourists. • 100 Temecula Brochures, 100 Winery Brochures, 50 Visitor t Temecula Valley Unified School District for distribution in ne packets. • 200 Winery Brochures and 200 Temecula Brochures to Deser distribution to guests. • 200 Temecula Brochures, 200 Visitor Guides and 200 Winery for distribution to guests. • 200 Temecula Brochures to Pechanga Entertainment Center fi conference guests. • I00 School Brochures and 100 Temecula Brochures to Ranch distribution to nurses relocating to Temecula. • 50 Temecula Brochures and SO Winery Brochures to Trauma distribution at a TIP national convention heid in Temecula. • C2 Visitor Guides to A Grape Escape Balloon Adventure for c • 50 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to Sharon Taylor 'he 10ih Annual Business Showcase nment Center from 5:30pm - sponsor. The committee is currently 11 be held at the Pechanga s Promotions Committee had Allen Center make a presentation on the ttee meeting. ICFRG is scheduled to ~mmittee meeting. The committee is cola First Campaign. A redesign of blyman Hollingsworth gave Sacramento Breakfast held on tee and Board of Directors are will enhance urban water tion and conservation to include ly requesting questions from the obey 10, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. The on September 14, 2001. Power uage the public to get out and mecula Valley Bank on August 15, bership Drive is under way and tsoring a new member. Join us at 1:OOp.m. at Pat• & Oscar's in istian Church for distribution to College. tlley Museum Brochures to 'des and 20 Relocation Packets to employee personnel relocation Hills Premium Outlets for Brochures to the Pala Mesa Resort distribution to potential Springs Medical Center for Program for ibution to clients. distribution to wedding guests. • 42 Visitor Guides and 42 Winery Brochures to Katherine Hiill for distribution to wedding guests. • 25 Visitor Guides and 25 Winery Brochures to the Califomifi Connection for distribution [o visitors from Scotland. • 25 Visitor Guides and 25 Winery Brochures to Melinda Si group visiting Temecula. • 25 Temecu]a Brochures, 25 Visitor Guides, 25 Winery Br. Temeku Hills Information Center for distribution to new h • 10 Temecula Brochures, 10 City Maps, 10 Visitor Guides 21 Wright for distribution to potential residents moving to • 10 Visitor Guides and 10 Winery Brochures to Spirit of A in Temecula. 1~'Iarketing Highlights: • TVCC's staff nominated and submitted 14 of Temecula's m; the 2002 edition of the California Celebrations publication California's official source of events and features tnore than • Over 400 visitor surveys were completed at the Temecula VI Enclosed is a summary of TVCC's Balloon & Wine Tourisn • The California Guide to Fairs, Festivals & Craft Shows 2 2002 Calendar of Events. The informative book is distribute commercial vendors. It is also a valuable marketing tool for Activity Report: • Total Tourism calls were 1,765 in August. • Total Phone calls were 3,251 in August. • Total Walk-ins were up 43 percent in August. • Total Mailings were up 4.15 percent in August. • E-mail requests were up 11.11 percent in August. Also attached are the meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visito Means, Membership and Marketing, Local Business Promotions, and TVCC's Balloon & Wine Tourism and Business Surveys. If this information, please call me at (909) 676-5090. Thank you. Sincerely, Alice Su wail/~~~ PrestdenUCEO cc: Mayer Jett Cnmcrchem Mayor Pro Tcm Run Roberts ('ouncilman 1cIP Stene Councilman Sam Pratt Councilmm~ Mikc Nagger Shawn Nelson, City Manager Jim O'GraJy, Assistant City Mnnagcr Gary "ntumhill, Deputy Ciry Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Gnmdinan>r 'rVCC nuanl a(Directors for distribution to a motor home and 10 Relocation Packets to 10 Winery Brochtres to Century Tours for distribution at a tour jor event applications to be placed in California Celebrations 2002 is 1,100 annual celebrations. Iley Balloon & Wine Festival, 2001. and Business Surveys. 102 edition requested Temecula's 1 to crafters, artist, food vendors and nquiries and distributed statewide. Council, Education, Ways & avemment Action Committee's u have any questions regarding TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF CO MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR AUGUST, 2001 PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS Chamber This Month Vis. This RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS ` CHAMBER REFERRALS WALK-INS TOURISM CALENDAR OF EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL WALK-INS MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL CHAMBER REFERRALS 310 206 117 1,132 1,765 217 90 986 193 3,251 NIA 305 179 60 1,036 244 90 904 222 3,040 117 92 92 301 47 17 126 190 NIA THIS 107 3 0 t66 3 0 0 0 279 Total Year-To-Date 2,851 1,590 2,261 9,375 16,077 1,721 637 9,762 1,587 29,784 NIA 3,436 1,419 851 9,769 2,012 759 7,301 1,591 27.138 973 864 688 2,525 390 298 940 1,628 NIA YEAR-TO-DATE 29,784 27,138 2,525 1,628 _;.:~. r ANNUAL PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS CHAMBER REFERRALS WALK-INS TOURISM CALENDAR OF EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS TOTAL WALK-INS MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL Chamber August, 2000 337 154 65 1,311 1,867 132 27 1,314 178 3,518 N/A 242 142 25 562 202 53 818 114 169 2,327 98 100 91 289 20 42 109 171 310 206 117 ,132 ,765 217 90 986 193 N/A 305 179 60 244 90 904 222 279 117 92 92 47 17 Percentage Increase _g 34 80 -14 -5 64 233 -25 8 _g N/A 26 26 140 84 21 70 11 95 65 43 19.39 -8.00 1.10 4.15 135.00 -59.52 15.60 11.11 Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls Rfve~s~ s~ ~ + v y P ~ ~ ' C ;. 0 N ~ tlry of lake Flsbwre 730 Bakh Maln Street Lake Elsinae, CA 92530 19091 fi7a3124 Fax 19091fi7a2392 n9' of Mtnteta 26442 Beckman Ct. MunieU, CA 925fi2 I90913oa24as Fax: 1909169&95 CNy otTemeala 43200 Business Park Dr. lemecuW, CA 92590 Isssl ss4~aaa Fax: 19D916946499 rainy m xrvasMe rwnomk Development pgenry 27447 Enterprise Cirde West Surte 701 Temeala, CA92590 Iso91 soas9B9 Fax: 19091 fiG06040 ~EFJ~l~,~1ClfE ~~~4' V TO: Marlene Best Jim O' Assistant City Manager Assist City of Lake Elsinore City of FROM: Stevie Field Economic Develooment/Marketir Lori Moss Manager Assistant City Manager 21a City of Murrieta Coordinator DATE: September 1, 2001 SUBJECT: SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE Dear Partners: Please consider this an update on the marketing Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Busir Leads: As a result of advertising efforts, eleven leads wl and brochure response cards and six IEEP projf 97 calls and/or attempts were made to follow-up Consulting ities for the Alliance as required in the Attraction Agreement. generated, five from personal inquires leads. recent and past leads. Ron Nater has now completed his first month wit of UCR Connect, to determine how the Alliance c. in the SWRC region. Dennis was very optimistic goals and was confident that we can work togethB and I will be attending all future springboard mee Steve Austin, a second meeting has been sche Hunter restaurant in Temecula. All Partners are the Alliance. We met with Dennis Frank l work with Connect yet keep its interests bout the Alliance and our venture capital in the future. Effective immediately, Ron igs. At the request of Dennis Frank and uled for September 13th at the Hungry relcome to join us. Ron and I have also met with some of the local brokers. The purpose of these meetings is to gather feedback on how the Alliance can better] assist the brokers as well as to keep our finger on the pulse of new businesses coming into SWRC. I will provide verbal updates of our finding, at the Alliance meeting on Septembef 12rn CD-ROM The latest copy of the CD-ROM is ready to be viewed at the next Alliance meeting. Ken is also preparing 20 disks for distribution to Partners and staff. This will ensure that the CD's will work with any computer. The cover anc~ label have been changed to our specifications and are ready for approval. Trade Shows As of this date, the Alliance has committed to tt • Wescon, Oct. 16-18, San Jose, CA • COMDEX -Computer & Technology, Nov. Future show for consideration: • APEX - (replaced Nepcon) -Electronic as CA • MD&M -Medical equipment, supplies and Web-site/GIS following trade shows, which I will attend: Las Vegas, CA equipment ,Jan. 22-24, San Diego, February 5-7, Anaheim, CA After careful consideration, it has been determined that the Alliance will be entering into an agreement for GIS with GIS Planning in Berkeley. I am currently working with Anatalio on the contract and hope to get started on this project immediately. I will be in contact with each Partner's GIS team requesting data. I will provide updates monthly on this project and will keep everyone updated via email as progress is made. Economic Profile Report I have obtained all of the information needed for the economic report. A breakdown of this report will be supplied to each Partner at the September meeting. At this meeting, a draft copy of the report from the graphic designer for comments/approval will be provided. Regional Update Breakfast Prospective dates for the next Regional Update are the following: 8 a.m. - 9 a.m., October 24, 2001 8 a.m. - 9 a.m., October 31, 2001 Please check your calendars and let me know of ~ I am working with Marlene as to whether the city associated with having the breakfast at the Diam As discussed at the July Partner meeting, we ~n projects and progress rather than on city updates. with approximately three minutes for a brief upda rich date works best with your schedule. Lake Elsinore can assist with the fees id Stadium or the Cultural Center. focus more on the Alliance activities, Each partner, however, will be provided On an ongoing basis I attend the following Manufacturer's Council Business Relations Committee EDC IEEP Partner meetings Economic Development meetings concerning UCR Connect meetings Southwest Riverside County region. If you need any additional information or have 600-6066. Sincerely, Stevie Field Economic Development & Marketing Coordi Copy: Brad Hudson Robin Zimpfer Sarah Mundy Robert Moran Teresa Gallavan questions, please contact me at (909) Clipboard September 2001 www.ieep.com We look forward to seeing you at IEEP's upcomin 3rd Annual Policy Conference "Inland Empire 2025 - - Without Compromise" October 2, 2001 from 7:30 a.m. ~0 12:00 p.m. REAL ESTATE SUCCESSES Becton, Dickinson and Co., a seller and manufacturer of medical devices and equipment used by healthcare professionals, is consolidating its Chino and Fontana warehouses into a 424,000 square foot distribution center, including an 8,000 square foot office building on San Bernardino Avenu~ in Redlands. The 24-acre site will allow for future growth and room to accommodate another 150,000 square feet of building space over the next five years producing an estimated 80 jobs. The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) assisted this company with workforce development information. Source: The Sun Adam Nutrition, a manufacturer of vitamins, has expanded into 155,Ob0 square feet of industrial space located at 11010 Hopkins Street, Unit B, in Mira Loma. The signing of this six~year lease is valued at $3.5 million. Scott Ostlund of Lee &Associates-Ontario represented the lessee and Jay Dick of CB Richard Ellis represented the lessor, Space Center. AA Bridal/Apex TK, a Chino-based manufacturer and wholesaler ofbridal headwear, has relocated from within Chino purchasing a 33,500 square foot industrial building located at 41115 Schaefer Avenue in Majestic Spectrum. Karl Heim and Mark Kegans of Grubb & Ellis Company represented the buyer in this $2.5 million deal. International Institute of Municipal Clerks, a leading professional nonprofit association of Municipal Clerks and officials from cities and towns around the world, is relocating its corporate headquarters, bringing with them their staff of 13, from San Dimas to 8331 Utica Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. The company has purchased a 10,150 square foot office building and expects to occupy the space in September 20b1. Greg Martin of Grubb & Ellis Company represented the seller, a private investor, and Todd Launchbaugh of Lee &Associates-Ontario represented the buyer in this $1.1 million deal. Fitness Outlet Inc., a company that refurbishes used exercise equipment, is relocating its Lake Forest warehouse into 16,303 square feet of space located at 4107 Indus Way in Riverside. The three-year lease is valued at approximately $294,000. Herrick Johnson and Paul Whitehouse of Lee &Associates-Riverside represented the lessee and the lessor, Robert Brandy, in this transaction. Source: Costar _.. _~. _Y . - __~._.' CALENDAR ITEMS To register online for SBDC events: www.iesbdc.org September 14: "SBA Loans and How to Get One" is an informative Se Business Administration (SBA) and banking personnel from 10 a.m. information call 760.864.1311. that will be presented by the U.S. Small p.m. in Indio. Cost is $15. For more September 18: What you don't know can hurt you! A seminar entitled "Payroll Tax News for the New Employer' is being presented by the Califomia Employment Development Departure t (EDD) from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. in Victorville, free of charge. For more information call 760.951.1592. September 26: "Education" will be the topic of discussion for the Sep~ember Membersl-ip Luncheon that will be held from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Mission Inn, Riverside. Featured speakers are: Dc Herbert Fischer, County Superintendent; Roy C. Hill, Education Center; Dc David Long, Riverside County Superintendent of Schools. Cost is $25. For more information contact Margie Oswald at 909.890.1090 ext. p36. September 26: A seminar entitled "Small Business Finance and Accourjting" is being offered from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. in Victorville. Cost is $20. For more information ca11760.951.1592. September 28: "Get the Tax Facts!" is a one-day IRS workshop that will provide an overview of federal and state tax issues for small businesses. An enrolled agent will present this workshop from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m, in Ontario, free of charge. For more information call 909.466.6244. October 3: A special condensed seminar entitled "Business Plan De 9 p.m. in Yctorville. Cost is $20. For more information call 760.951.1 October 4: What you don't know can hurt you! A seminar entitled "Pa presented by the California Employment Development Department free of charge. For more information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781 October 4: "Franchising Opportunities in 2001." Franchising experts 1 business from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. in Rancho Cucamonga, free of charge. (Part I) is being held from 6 p.m. to Tax News for the New Employer' is being from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. in Moreno Valley, Frannet will discuss what to look for in a more information call 909.466.6244. October 8, 18, 23: "Develop Your Plan For Success" is a three-week comprehensive seminar that will provide a solid basis for creating your business plan. This seminar is sponsored by The Business Press and is being held from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. Cost is $40. For more information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345. ~ October 10: A special condensed seminar entitled "Business Plan Development' (Part II) is being held from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. in Vidorville. Cost is $20. For more information call 760.951.1692. October 10: Small Business Associates is presenting a seminar entitle) "The SBA Pre-Qualification Business Loan Program" from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. in Ontario. Cost is $15. For more information call 909.466.6244. October 11: This "Doing Business with the Government" workshop will provide you with a simple overview of how to sell your products and services to the Federal, State and Local governm nt. This workshop is being held from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. Cost is $15. For more information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345. October 18: IEEP is hosting aVIP/Prospective Member Breakfast Galleda Room, Riverside, free of charge. Please RSVP to Margie Os IEEP would like to welcome its new 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. at the Mission Inn, at 909.890.1090 ext. 236 by October 10. t Community Partner ~ City of Barstow WELCOME NEW MEMBERS HardHatBid, Inc. (HDB) provides an unparalleled, proprietary system notification and bidding process from, land acquisition to development can be reached at 909.682.4445. Kleinfelder Inc. provides civil, mechanical and geotechnical Project Manager, can be reached at 909.506.1488. encompasses the entire construction pletion. John P. Parks, PresidentlCEO, services and engineering. Rick Smith, Rhodes College is a provider of Associate of Science degrees in Criminal Justice, Business, and Technology, giving their students quality instruction, a sense of professional responsibility, end the essential skills and abilities to succeed in their chosen career. Eugenia Lockhart, President, can be ruched at 909.484.4311. Riverside Physician Network is an Independent Practice Association serving the health care needs of over 65,000 Riverside area residents reached at 909.788.9800. Thalman Financial Services provides leasing and financing for all of President, can be reached at 760.242.1086. CRECK US OUT I!I IEEP ACTIVITY REPORT for AUGUST Business Development -noted three leads and 23 inquiries for a Empire Flfm Commission (IEFC) -registered 54 total days of film a permits issued in San Bernardino County, 15 issued in Riverside Cou Management (BLM), for an economic impact of $1,305,000. Small E reported the creation of five jobs and the retention of 33 jobs for an ~ counseled 137 clients for 711 client hours, and conducted three trai attendees. of more than 200 local physicians 1984. Charles Stewart, CEO, can be equipment needs. Andrew Thorn, I of 55 leads year-to-date. The Inland ty and 99 requests for locations, with five and eight issued for the Bureau of Land ness Development Center (SBDC) - iomic impact of $6,319,000. The SBDC events for 540 training hours and 182 STATE FAIR ANNOUNCES COUNTY WINNERS Year after year, the most popular program at the California State Fair particularly noteworthy because no other state fair showcases county counties were represented in the 2001 competition, including San together as the Inland Empire. The Inland Empire exhibit, which showcased the region as both of America," received Silver Awards. The next opportunity to view the Inland Empire exhibit will be the 2002 INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL VISITOR S The Inland Empire Tourism Council (IEHTC) has selected Dragonf 2002 Inland Empire Regional Vlsltor & Meeting Planner Guide. TI meeting planners and residents on events, places to visit, family activitir North, Coachella Valley, Mountains, Temecula Valley, and throughor distributed to guests at Inland Empire hotels and to Convention and Vi throughout the Inland Empire. Additional copies will be distributed at California Visitor Centers, and in response to the IETC web site and magazine. For information on advertising opportunities, please contact jbloom@uberadv.com. ~) is the Counties Exhibits. This is Fifty-five of California's fifty-eight and Riverside counties exhibiting Largest Backlot" and the "Golf Capital Date Festival in February 2002. FETING PLANNER GUIDE /er Press of Upland to publish the Official is guide will provide information for visitors, s, dining and recreation in the Inland Empire t the rest of the Inland Empire. It will be ~itors Bureaus and Chambers of Commerce nternational travel industry trade shows, all ads in the State Visitor Guide and Sunset John Bloom at 909.981.3141 or via e-mail at "Inland Empire 2025 - - Without Compromise" The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) is hosting i~s 3r° Annual Policy Conference entitled "Inland Empire 2025 - -Without Compromise" on Octo~er 2, from 7:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Mission Inn in Riverside with an optional Met,opolitan Water District Tour of Diamond Valley Lake from 12:00 The focus of this conference will be on the future of our growth in all areas: Transportation and Housing, Water, Our audience will be local businesses, government, and t~ the Inland Empire. For more information contact Portia Leadership Program Fellow at pbesockeCriliet Cost of Conference (includes buffet bn Cost of Diamond Valley Lake Tour (includes Please RSVP by Wednesday, September 26, 2001, to Ma Conference Sponsors Platinum: BIABaIdy View Chapter, Ca1lPoint, Chaffey College, City of Hes Action Resource Trust (HART), Inland Empire Economic Partnership, Loma Water District, Quality Printing, The Business Press, The Gas Company - A Gold: Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Silver: A-Check America, DPR Construction, Inc., Employers Group, Inland to 5:00 p.m. Inland Empire, projecting :hnology, Energy and Air Quality. Get involved in shaping the future of IEEP's Sustainable Communities or 909.890.1090 ext. 227. ist) is $ 40.00 'd lunch) is $ 20.00 Oswald at 909.890.1090 ext. 236. Eastern Municipal Water District, Housing University Medical Center, Metropolitan a Energy Company, 91 Express Lanes. Utilities Agency. TEMECULA VALLEY FIL11't COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPO~tT August 2001 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council ire Maggi Allen, President; Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Steve Phelps, S~cretary/Treasurer; Pat Martinez, Molly Mathis, Judi Staats, Eve Craig, oe Hohenberger, Patty Slaton and Ellen Watkins The Business of the Film Council • This month we received 213 phone calls; 1~5 -Film Festival, 8-locations information requests; 30-council business. • The TVFC web site. ~.~emec„iasim.ore has received 1080 "hits" since it opened on September 4, 2000. Photo and linl~ updates aze a continuous process. The web site is currently being updated to include a Film Festival link and new photographs collected om the "Great Temecula Shootout". • Production meetings for the Temecula Valley Film and Music "Fest 2001" aze continuing, now on a bi-wee y basis Film and Music applications have been received in abundance as well as many inquiry phone calls. Over 25 bands have been chosen as finalist for the competition to be held on September 14~' in t e old, but now newly renovated Von's Mazket in Tower Plaza. Ov~r 500 films were received for consideration of which 80 have been chosen for the festival. Sponsorship procurement continued. Invitatigns were mailed and major press releases have gone out. Sponsorship/Press preview on August 16~' at the Movie Experience was very successful with band members and film makers in attendance for questions and answers. • Film Council members have taken volunteer ositions with the Film Festival as, Operations Coordinator, Workshop Coordinator, Volunteer Coordinators and Event Chairpeople. All Film makers will be greeted and given Guest Packs including local information and maps on Wineries, Old Town and points of interest. Each will also receive TVFC filming in Temecula brochures and photogra hs of the area. TVFC will sell souvenir hats and magnets in the Festival Mazketplace • The first television presentation of the Student of the Month was broadcast on Adelphia cable channe128 from 6:00 -7:00 p. m. on August 14`h just before the Temecula City Council same time. This was the first taping and ei Department at Chaparral High School and have received positive feedback from the c continue with taping in September and bro Filming in Temecula • ABC Television was filming in the • Flying Tiger Productions requested informa and received our permiting packet with local • Students from Chaparral High School will be Month in September. • Keith Warn of Ibex Productions arranged film "Sorority Girl's Revenge" at the Movi 26th. This movie was filmed in and around starred the former Miss Temecula Rodeo. good, but don't expect to ever see this film • Network corespondents from Japan and Franc about to contact Gloria Wolnick with the City information on the City of Temecula for touri their countries. • Greenstemp Productions will be taping the Fi promotional opportunities. They will also be and production apprentices. We will continue to support the daily manageme and encourage the growing awareness of the ind is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the context of filmmaking activities, and to present t benefits of this production to local merchants an. Respectfully, Maggi Allen President, TVFC ing and again on the 28`t', by the Video across very well. We .-nity. This effort will tinQ in October. on filming in Temecula Student of the br a sneak preview of his Experience on August the Temecula area and Cemecula looked very n local theaters again. have contacted or are for FAM tours and m pieces to be presented in Festival for future nQ local students as film of filmmaker's requests, ry in this community. It Area within the e opportunities and businesses. EDC September 14, 2001 Jim O'Grady City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 RE: Activity Summary -August 2001 Business Develonment Staff received the following six business development leads: • August 14, 2001 - A follow-up phone call to Michael Ghafouri o1 contact information to Mr. Ghafouri to help resolve ongoing postal provide contact information on regional medical-related businesses. • August 28, 2001 - A phone inquiry from Jean Martin, owner of Big 1 referred to the EDC through the energy audit project. She was seeking sources for anon-profit organization she is developing. Staffsent hei vazious funding sources, and a referral to an individual involved in gran • August 29, 2001 - A phone inquiry from the owner of The Golden Spy He was seeking finance information to help facilitate the sale of his Lopez. Staff spoke with Ms. Lopez and refen•ed her to the SBDC, funding sources. Staff also provided Ms. Lopez with contacts to inquir • August 29, 2001- A phone inquiry from Tim Yates who owns a re< Mr. Yates was seazching for commercial office space in Temecula. St various office sites. • August 29, 2001 - An in-person meeting with Marilyn Ganley of Tota provides office interior solutions for new and existing businesses. • August 30, 2001 - A phone inquiry from Ron Beck of Colliers Intern: regional demographics. Staff mailed Mc Beck copies of demographic and Temecula. Community Outreach Staff attended the following meetings/events: • August 1, 2001- SWRC Manufacturers' Council Board Meeting • August 3, 2001 - Murrieta-Temecula Group Meeting -Guest spi presented plans to road improvements in Riverside County and addre issues. • August 7, 2001 -Congressman Darrell Issa's Town Hall Meet priorities relative to education, defense, health care, and Border 1 participants. • August 8, 2001 - TVCC Voter Education Campaign Meeting ADEX Medical in Temecula. Staff provided service issues. Staff responded to a request to lud's Florist in Canyon Lake. Ms. Martin was fmancial information for her business and grant a Business Resource Guide, provided her with t seeking and non-profit management. bn restaurants in Temecula and Moreno Valley. vforeno Valley business to a new owner, Terry CDC Small Business Finance Corp. and other on minority-owned businesses. idential real estate and interior design business. ff provided Mr. Yates with lease information on Plan, a business interior company. Ms. Ganley in San Diego. Mr. Beck was looking for for the cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Ann Mayer, Regional Director of Cal Trans, challenges with present and future traffic flow - Congressman Issa briefed attendees on his ~l checkpoints, and answered questions from Board of Directors Activity Summary -August 2001 Page 2 of 2 • August 14, 2001 -Temecula Corporate Centre Wall Tilting Open promote the development of Temecula Corporate Centre on Rancho R • August 15 & 16, 2001 -Workforce Development -Staff met with 1 provide a tour of the Workforce Development Center. • August 17, 2001 -TVCC Voter Education Campaign Meeting • August 24, 2001 - Murrieta Cbamber of Commerce Annual Chamber of Commerce with their annual golf tournament. • August 27, 2001 -Riverside County Transportation Commisai scoping meeting that provided details of the proposed transportation pi • August 29, 2001 - SWRC Manufacturers' Council Board Meeting • August 29, 2001 -Jefferson Avenue Corridor Master Plan U Associates to update the community on specific details and developme • August 31, 2001-TVCC Voter Education Campaign Meeting Business Relations • August 2, 2001- (See attached meeting minutes for discussion Administratiou/Oreaui~tiou • August 16, 2001 EDC Board of Directors Meeting held in the Wr attached meeting minutes for discussion topics.) • August 16, 2001 -EDC Program Committee Meeting- Commit program. • August 23, 2001 -Workforce Development Partner Meeting 1 Temecula. Topics included mutual staff issues and interests relative to • August 28, 2001 -Workforce Development Safety Meeting held in i Staff is on the WDC Safety Team and attends scheduled meetings to di • August 28, 2001 -Workforce Development All-Staff Meeting Temecula. Topics included mutual staff issues and interests relative to • August 1-31, 2001 -Energy Audit Program -Staff managed the S The project is funded by Riverside County EDA, in partnership with 1 were provided free energy audits. The target goal will be to complete 1 • Administration -Staff managed the daily operations of the EDC office This concludes the activity summary for August 2001. Should you have 600-6064. House - Coldwell Banker held an open house to ay and Business Park Drive in Temecula. vo individuals to assist with job placement and to Touruameut -Staff assisted the Murrieta Scoping Meeting -Staff attended a public ;ts within Riverside County. late Meeting - A presentation by Webb & of the Jefferson Avenue improvements. Development Center in Temecula. (See members planned the next quarterly lunch I in the Workforce Development Center in ;h partner agency within the Center. Workforce Development Center in Temecula. ss various site safety issues. l in the Workforce Development Center in ;h partner agency within the Center. hwest Riverside County energy audit project. .on. Over seventy-five local small businesses audits by late October. or need further detail, please call me at Diane Sessions EDC of Southwest Riverside County DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT C OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSID BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENEI Thursday, August 16, 2001- Workforce Development ~ 27447 Enterprise Circle West, T BOARD MEMBERS Scott Crane, Inland Valley Medical Center Dennis Frank, UCR Extension Ted Haring, Eastern Municipal Water District Ron Holliday, City of Murrieta Rob Moran, Riverside County EDA Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Rex Oliver, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce David Phazes, D.L. Phares & Associates Claude Reinke, The Californian David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council Robert Ryan, Keeton Construction Al Sabsevitz, Verizon Lorie Schulenberg, California Bank & Trust Gary Youmans, Community National Bank Diane CALL TO ORDER • Boazd President Gary Youmans called the meeting to order at MINUTES • The Board reviewed the minutes of the July 19, 2001 Board of Haring, seconded by Dennis Frank and carried nnanimOUSIy 1 Boazd of Directors Meeting as presented. FINANCIAL REPORT • The Boazd reviewed the July 31, 2001 Financial Report that sho expenses of $4,545 and total cash-in-bank of $77,355. Diane S memberships and outstanding golf registrations would be rea Sessions reported the EDA would fund $7,500 for an Energy E explained the purpose and details of the project. Ms. Session Services expenses be reallocated to Consulting Fees to prope auditors. She further recommended that a new revenue line iter project funding. Motion was made by Ron Holliday, seconded approve the July 31, 2001 Financial Report as presented and "Special Project" income line item and to reallocate $7,500 froi Fees. tPORATION COUNTY L MEETING uu a.m. CA MEMBERS AND GUESTS Stevie Field SWRC Economic Alliance Frank Casciazi, California Bank & Trust a.m hectors Meeting. Motion was made by Ted approve the minutes of the July 19, 2001 red total monthly revenues of $12,606, total ssions reported that revenue increases from zed within the next several months. Ms. adit project facilitated by the EDC, and she recommended that $7,500 from Personnel y report the payroll costs for two project be added to the operating budget to report ry Jim O'Grady and carried unanimously to i amend the operating budget to include a Personnel Services expenses to Consulting EXHIBIT 2.0 Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Boazd of Directors Meeting -August 16, 2001 Minutes -Page 2 of 4 • Quarterly Luncheon Reconciliation: The Boazd reviewed th quarterly lunch, which showed a deficit of revenues over expe~ facility chazge of $300 for use of the Diamond Club Restauran chazge of only $150 and would contact the City of Lake E1 reported that attendance was low due to typical summer-mc recommended the EDC not hold luncheons during peak summer NEW BUSINESSS • Adopt Administrative Resolution #2001-OS (Back Account Resolution #2001-OS to change authorized signers on the corpc the resolution, in accordance with corporate bylaws, remove added Ron Holliday, Vice President. Gary Youmans, Phil Obe authorized signers on the corporate bank accounts while serv reported he was a Murrieta City Council candidate and could Sessions reported that two signatures were required on all cl resolution to reflect Mr. Holliday's signing authority. Motion Sabsevitz and carried unanimously to approve Administrative verbiage to reflect the limits of Mr. Holliday's signing authority • Busiuess referral List: Diane Sessions provided the Boazd witl 2000-2001 Annual Report. Ms. Sessions reported that twen EDC, seven of which were requests for business-to-business absence, Ms. Sessions requested that the Board approve the c business owners during retention visits. David Rosenthal reps business owners with a referral list during visits, but suggestei EDC office directly. The Boazd discussed confidentiality and could be made to businesses on a request basis by calling the referral policies could be discussed with Michael Lewin at th announced the Business Relations Committee was an integral 1 EDC members support retention visits. CONTINUING BUSINESS • County Redistricting: The Boazd discussed the proposed ~ reported that EDC letters were sent to Riverside County Board Elsinore. • Energy Issues -Susan Norton reported that Guidant had seen decreases in usage. Robert Ryan reported that many new deve generation plants. The Boazd discussed the feasibility of manuE a co-generation plant. David Rosenthal advised he would monit manufacturing industry. reconciliation report for the July 26, 2001 es of $246.30. Discussion was held on the Diane Sessions reported she anticipated a pore to resolve the issue. Gary Youmans nth schedules, such as vacations, etc. He ): The Boazd reviewed draft Administrative ate bank accounts. Diane Sessions reported David Phazes as an authorized signer and oansley, and Keith Johnson would remain as ig as officers on the Board. Ron Holliday of sign singly on the bank accounts. Diane scks over $200, and she would amend the vas made by Dennis Frank, seconded by Al :esolution #2001-OS as amended by adding n all checks. copies of the Business Relations Committee y companies requested assistance from the and vendor referrals. In Michael Lewin's incept of providing a vendor referral list to rted he would not be in favor of providing that referrals could be made by calling the solicitation issues, and agreed that referrals iDC office. The Board further agreed that next committee meeting. Gary Youmans trt of EDC activities and requested that all mty redistricting lines. Gary Youmans Supervisors on behalf of the City of Lake 93% energy cost increase, even with major lopments may considered installation of co- cturing companies such as Guidant building ~r the use of co-generation plants within the EXHIBIT 2.1 Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting -August 16, 2001 Minutes -Page 3 of 4 • Energy Audit Project: Diane Sessions reported the EDA woo with Edison to provide energy conservation resources and rebat County. Projects goals to audit 100 small businesses by independent auditors under the direction of EDC staff. Ms. S were already completed. • RCIP Update: Lake Elsinore - No report available. Murri~ O'Grady reported the Western Riverside Council of Governme Thursday, September 6 to review the proposed RCIP and to acc~ • 2002 Golf Tournament: Gary Youmans reported that bids fo from Bear Creek Golf Club and SCGA. He recommended the F Mr. Youmans suggested that tournament entry fees be increasc O'Grady suggested that a bid from Cross Creek Golf Club be item: Diane Sessions to obtain a golf tournament bid from Cro: OPEN DISCUSSION • EDC Administrative Update: The Boazd reviewed the July 2( by Diane Sessions. • City, County and Chamber Updates: City of Lake Elsinore Ron Holliday reported the Jefferson Avenue Corridor Master workshops with the Steering Committee to discuss affordable ] reported the Rancho Water District found contamination in somF cause; the City Council authorized litigation to oppose the Coy French Valley azea; the City Council approved the first reading known referendum activities to oppose the project; the Planning Roripaugh Project; the new Saturn dealership would soon celel sublease agreement for a Mitsubishi dealership; Scotts Company Phazes suggested the Boazd continue to take interest in the Frer keep the Boazd updated. County of Riverside EDA -Rob M Lunch would be held today. SWRC Economic Alliance - S profile was going to print; the marketing CD-ROM project c identifying and local venture capitalists. Lake Elsinore Val available. Murrieta Chamber of Commerce -Rex Oliver rep candidate's forum on October 18 at 7:00 p.m. at Murrieta Counc completed; the Chamber golf tournament was scheduled for E Commerce - No report available. • SWRC Manufacturers' Council -David Rosenthal reported tl September 21 and would feature a brief presentation of the Pec other topics. • Gary Youmans suggested that future EDC agendas include "UCR fund an energy audit project in partnership to small businesses in Southwest Riverside e October would be conducted by two sions reported that one-third of the audits a - No report available. Temecula -Jim is (WRCOG) would hold a city summit on ~t public comments. next year's golf tournament were received Yazd approve SCGA's bid of $80 per player. t to $125 due to increased expenses. Jim rbtained before making a decision. Action Creek Golf Club. 1 EDC Monthly Activity Report submitted - No report available. City of Murrieta - lan was ongoing and the City would hold Dosing. City of Temecula -Jun O'Grady water wells and would work to identify the nty's approval of property rezoning in the f the Hazveston Project, and there were no commission continued consideration of the •ate their open house; the City approved a obtained a limited occupancy permit. David ;h Valley rezoning issues. Jun O'Grady to ran reported the UCR Quarterly Forecast ;vie Field reported the regional economic as in process; Alliance activities included 'y Chomber of Commerce - No report ~rted the Chamber would host a televised Chambers; the Resource Guide was neazly ugust 24. Temecula Valley Chamber of next Council luncheon was scheduled for mga Entertainment Center expansion and Update". EXHIBIT 2.2 Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Boazd of Directors Meeting -August 16, 2001 Minutes -Page 4 of 4 • EDC Business Relations Committee Update -Previously ADJOURNMENT • At 10:10 a.m, motion was made by Dennis Frank, seconded adjourn the boazd meeting. Respectively submitted by: Diane Sessions Recording Secretary during New Business. Rosenthal and carried unanimously to Phil O Boazd EXHIBIT 2.3 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERS)~E COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMi~TTEE MEETING Thursday, August 2, 2001- 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center, E cutive Board Rooro 27447 Enterprise Circle West~Temecula, CA Committee Members Present: Stevie Field, SWRC Economic Alliance Lisa Gazcia-Gleissner, Riverside County EDA Michael Lewin, Mirau, Edwazds, Cannon, Harter & Lewin Mazk O'Connor, Lee & Associates Rex Oliver, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce Tracy Picquelle, TriStaff Tony Renz, Diversified, The Staffing Solution David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council Diane Sessions, EDC Staff Alice Sullivan, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Call To Order • Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to Welcome • Michael Lewin welcomed committee members and Follow-uo Action Reports • Apex Manufacturing -Owner's major concern was Information was provided on the City of Temecula's 1 Comoanv Contact Reports • American Industrial Manufacturing Services, Inc. - Kurtz paid a visit with Julie Horn and Dianne M~ remanufactures automobile parts of various makes, exc Davidson. They would implement OEM soon. In of County, AIMS has been in Murrieta for 9 yeazs with primarily in Mumeta and Temecula, with most as: City/Menifee azeas. Workforce increased last yeaz by fif are very stable and reliable due to exceptional benefits baseball fields, gymnasium, and free lunch-time bever; Beach due to the area's affordability and low-cost la recent expansion was 50,000 squaze feet of wazehouse Self-ranked as top 10 in their mazket, sales were up in 2 company's new focus on OEM. Local economy is rank located in the Midwest. _~.: Also In Attendance: Ron Nater, Consultant SWRC Economic Alliance at 9:06 a.m. all for attending. of local affordable housing for employees. Time Homebuyers' Program. ~x Oliver reported he, Lori Moss and Dick of AIMS in Murrieta. The company Nissan. Their newest account was Hazley ation for 14 years in Southwest Riverside i employees. The administrative staff live iblers residing in the Lake Elsinore/Sun n employees in manufacturing. Employees ~h medical insurance, company soccer and s. The corporation relocated from Long for their build-to-suit location. The most ce. The company recycles their own water. 0 with a decrease so faz in 2001 due to the as getting worse. Primary competitors aze Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes -August 2, 2001 Page 2 of 4 Principal suppliers aze businesses that buy from auto repair shops located nationwide. Concerns noted were energy crisis matters and speeding motorists on Adams. Lori Moss to contact the city's police department to address speed/traffic issues. Action items: Alice Sullivan and David Rosenthal to research and provide information on funding/tax credits for manufacturers that recycle water. Urban Logic Consultants -Lisa Gazcia-Gleissner met with David Dillon of Urban Logic Consultants in Temecula. She reported the company operations included engineering, planning, municipal services and industrial sales. The company originated in 1993 in Southwest Riverside County. There are 12 employees locally and 30 total a all sites combined. Primary customers are municipal agencies. Their major competitor is US Filter in Palm Springs, CA. The company was self-ranked small in its industry, with sales up in the ~ast yeaz due to new venture and company expansion. Local economy was ranked stable. Suppliet~s aze located in Korea and India. Company employees live primarily in Murrieta and Temecula. There aze plans to expand the work site and increase the number of employees. Mr. Dillon was provvIided with informational brochures on SBA lending, ACCESS training, EDC material, and a Busines$ Resource Guide. Owner wanted additional information on demographics and income data in the French Valley region, waste water program/tax credit information and training. Action item: Stevie Field to provide owner with demographic and income data information. Michael Lewin to contact ~ennis Frank and Ted Haring to provide information on waste water and training information. Annual Goal Progress Report • Fiscal Yeaz-End Totals: The Committee reviewed the Lewin. He highlighted the Committee's goals and I to-date goal results as follows: 27 visits @ 3 points each + YTD VISIT Goal 27 Actual 23 Variance -4 33 phone interviews @ l F PHONE POINTS 33 114 26 92 -7 -22 Mr. Lewin reported that 79 company contact attempts per month. He further reported that 20 companies reque<. responses as follows: Issues # of Requests 1) Traffic 1 2) Business issues relating to city 6 services/permits/city programs 3) Employee training 6 4) Business expansion /referrals 7 1 Annual Report compiled by Michael e achievements, and announced yeaz- each = 60 visits/calls @114 points e made, which averaged over 6 contacts assistance from the EDC and all received Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes -August 2, 2001 Page 3 of 4 Due to the number of requests for business/servia member/company referral roster be created and made include a brief profile of business operations. David individual names and company profile information, alth~ contact with the EDC. • Michael Lewin suggested the Committee continue wit: comprised of 27 visits and 33 phone interviews. The Cc same as last yeaz and discussed targeting new business information on existing businesses that would expand. business owners to luncheon events. • Annual Visit Awards: Michael Lewin thanked everyc Relations Program He announced there were two cater participation. Mr. Lewin awazded certificates for "Best of the Yeaz" to Lori Moss for the most visits and poin acknowledged committee members for their dedication to New Committee Assi¢nments • Michael Lewin suggested that committee members make assigned visits. Diane Sessions circulated an a referrals, Mr. Lewin suggested that a ilable for future visits. The roster could senthal suggested the roster not include h referrals could be made through duect the same visitation goals of 60 per year unittee agreed the goals would remain the s for visits. Rex Oliver offered to shaze David Rosenthal suggested inviting new to for their commitment to the Business ories in which members showed exemplary attendance" to David Rosenthal and "Point s scored relative to visits. He thanked and the program several months of the new fiscal yeaz to it calendaz. EDC News and Other Information • Michael Lewin suggested that meeting and event anno cements be placed on the agenda before all other updates. • EDC Board Update - No report. • City, County & Chamber Updates -City of Murrieta -Rex Oliver reported the Jefferson Avenue Corridor project was moving forwazd and construction ould include Verizon's installation of DLS lines. City of Lake Elsinore - No report available. City of Temecula - No report available. Riverside County EDA - No report available. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce -Alice Sullivan reported that a strategic plan for the pro-business campaign was ongoing, and she thanked the EDC and Manufacturers' Council for their participation; a PowerPoint presentation would be included in the campaign; housing developments woul be discussed at the next Temecula City Council meeting; "Good Morning, Sacramento" woul beheld at Callaway Vineyazds; "Good Morning, Washington" was scheduled for October; Representative Ken Calvert was successful in lobby efforts to obtain $20 million to research and eradicate Pierce's disease; a candidates' forum for November elections was scheduled for October. Murrieta Chamber of Commerce -Rex Oliver reported the Chamber would focus on reintroducing pas programs that were currently inactive; the Chamber's annual golf tournament was scheduled foz ~ugust 24 at SCGA in Murrieta; tonight's mixer would be held at Well's Fargo Bank. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes -August 2, 2001 Page 4 of 4 SWRC Economic Alliance -Stevie Field introduced consulting services for the Economic Alliance; the C: Southwest Riverside County were moving forward and project would be completed by yeaz's end; a media camp; SWRC Manufacturers' Council -David Rosenthal re held in September at Pechanga Entertainment Center Department, Waterstone, a Murrieta manufacturer, ant O'Neal was very active in public speaking about energy i PUC proposal that could allow approval of energy rate that committee members write to elected officials in onnc Ron Nater and reported he would provide ~-ROM and economic profile projects for huld be completed by late August; the GIS ugn would be launched later in the yeaz. ported the next Council luncheon would be with featured topics by UCR Engineering l Pechanga. He further reported that Paul sues. He read an email message regarding a increases during closed sessions. He asked sition to the PUC proposal. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m ATTORNEY CTOR OF FINANC MANAGER ~_ CITY OF TEMECUL~ AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Co ncil FROM: Gary Thornhif}'Depu~ity Manager DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department in the month of August 2001. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 59 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home occupations and 16 applications for public hearings during the month of August. The new public hearing cases are as follows: Development Plan 7 Conditional Use Permit 2 Product Review 2 Minor Conditional Use Permit 1 Parcel Map 1 Substantial Conformance 2 General Plan Amendment 1 Status of Major Projects Staff is working with project applicants to address any remai ing issues and prepare the following cases for public hearing before the Director of Planning or Pilanning Commission: The Villages of Temecula -The design and constructiion of a 160-unit, 2-story apartment complex w/clubhouse and pool, on the south side of Rancho California Road, between Cosmic Drive and south extension of Moraga, east of the proposed Temecula Ridge Apartments; and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Planned Development Overlayfor an office/retail component along Rancho California Road. The community meeting with adjacent property owners and homeowners' associations was held on Fj~ebruary 8, 2001. Staff is currently reviewing the initial study. Harveston Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and Development Agreement -the City Council certified the FEIR, and approved the Specific Pfan and Development Agreement on August 14, 2001. R:Vv10NTHLY.RPT~2001 Wugust 2001.doc • Roripaugh Ranch Annexation, Specific Plan, Environm~ Agreement: The Planning Commission reviewed the E direction to the applicant and continued it to October 17, applicant since then to address the Commission's conc Impact Report and Development :t on August 15, 2001, provided . Staff has been meeting with the • Meadowview Golf Course -On June 7, 2000, the Planni i g Commission continued the case off calendar at the request of the applicant. The applicant has submitted a draft focused EIR -staff is reviewing document and has provided comments to thi; consultant. Consultant was provided Staff's EIR comments on September 6, 2001. Staff is awaiting revisions. • Palomar Hotel -Remodel of the existing Palomar Hotel to the Palomar Inn (a bed and breakfast) located on the northeast corner of Front and Fjfth Streets. DRC meeting was held on January 27, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal. • Waltz Industrial Building - A 9,000 square foot concrete tilt-up facility for N/C Industries located on the southside of Roick Drive and west of Winchester) Road. The applicant resubmitted on July 6, 2001. Approved by Planning Commission on August 22, 2001. • SunridgeCommunityChurch-An 88,918 square foot re programs, Sunday school, weddings and funerals, a auditorium with nursery; atwo-story, 21-room educatic high grades; asingle-story, 9,840 square foot multi-pur assembly room; atwo-story, 10,622 square foot admin single-story, 6,163 square foot youth center building; storage and maintenance building. The proposed site Butterfield Stage Road, 1,400 feet north of Rancho Calif held on January 11, 2001. Staff has requested a supple another community meeting. Etco Plaza -The design and construction of two specs feet, on two lots. The lots are located on the east Sanborn Avenue. The project went to DRC on Nove Planning Commission review on March 28, 2001. The staff reviewed a redesigned proposal. Planning Comr September 5, 2001. Rancho Community Church - Application to design, con campus on a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will in and school facilities and a 477,449 four story parking sti number of phases beginning with a 1,500 seat interim nursery; a four story, 42,716 square foot administra buildings, a 9,695 square foot preschool, a 300 seat, 5,E buildings totaling 10,000 square feet, and lighted at permanent first through twelfth grade classroom faciliti square foot worship center, and a parking structure. Th State Highway 79 South east of Jedidiah Smith Road. 14, 2000. The applicant resubmitted new drawings Au • Hampton Inn Suites -Application to design, and cor approximately 41,100 square feet. Located on the nc Winchester Road Adjacent to the I-15 off-ramp. DRC 3ious facility in two phases for worship, isisting of a single-story, 1,500-seat facility for elementary through junior use building with kitchen, lockers and tration and Sunday school building; a nd a single-story, 1,040 square foot on the west side of the extension of rnia Road. A community meeting was rental EIR, redesign of the project and e buildings, each at 23,500 square of Madison Avenue at the end of 30, 2000 and was scheduled for act was continued off-calendar and in approved project on truct and operate a church and school ude 279,957 square feet of religious icture. The site will be developed in a sanctuary with assembly room and a on building, 15 modular classroom i6 square foot chapel, two field house letic fields. Future phases include ,, a gymnasium, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 project is located on the north side of )RC meeting was held on December ust 22, 2001. a 4-story, 75-room hotel building t corner of Jefferson Avenue and ig was held on January 11, 2001. R:UAONTHLY.RPT2001 Wugus12001.doc Revised plans were submitted on August 16'h and address previous concerns. • Burger King -Conditional Use Permit Application to drive thru fast food restaurant on Parcel 2, PM 2 approved at Director's Hearing on August 30, 2001. has requested revisions in order to i and construct a 4,691 square foot Paseo del Sol. This project was • Inland Terrace Investment Group -Development Plan todesign and construct a 55,697 square foot office building located on the Western Bypass Parcel 4 of PM 28473. The project was discussed at DRC on May 31, 2001. This project was a (proved at the September 6`h Planning Commission. Mosco Lot 20 -Development Plan application to design and construct a 16,400 square foot warehouse/office spec building on 1.52 acres. The project is located on Winchester Road between Zevo and Colt Ct. The proposed project was submitted on June 22, 2001, and was deemed incomplete. Revised plans submitted on Augu~t 17`h are still incomplete. • Mosco Lot 29 -Development Plan application to design and construct a 11,600 square foot warehouse/office spec building on .92 acres. The projec is located in the vicinity of W inchester and Diaz Road. The proposed project was submitted on ~ une 22, 2001 with additional materials submitted on August 17, 2001. The project is scheduled, for DRC on September 27, 2001. • Tentative Parcel Map No. 30166 (Southwest Traders) '~ A Planning Application to subdivide 10.86 acres into three parcels located between Rancho California Road and W inchester Road on Diaz Road. Awaiting revised plans to conform to the ~uubdivision Ordinance. Applicant has resubmitted, awaiting comments from other department. • Golf Career College: Conditional Use Permit application to design and construct a 10,000 square foot golf instruction classroom, administrative center with ancillary pro-shop and a nine hole par three practice course on a twenty acre site along Rancho Vista Road between Margarita Road and Meadows Parkway. Awaiting submittal of complete application. • Paloma del Sol Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan!Amendment and Tentative Tract Map Amendment - To relocate commercial in the northeast portion of the project to the southwest (adjacent to the other commercial). Staff is reviewing resubmitted materials. • Eli Lilly Tentative Parcel Map 30107 - A commercial subdivision of 40.09 acres into five lots on the southeast corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road currently under review, initial study being prepared. • Wolf Creek General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan jmendment -the property owner has submitted a conceptual plan to allow for a senior housing area on the south half of the project. This could entail the creation of a gated senior community and may involve the relocation of the community park to the middle portion of the project. The General Plan Amendment involves relocating the sports park from Deer Hollow Road to Wolf Valley Road. • Albertson's Express Mini Mart -Conditional Use Permit Planning Application to construct a 1,989 square foot mini-mart building, a 76 foot x 40 foot canopy structure over three rows of gas pump islands, and a 1,165 square foot building for adrive-thru automated car wash. The site is located at the northeast corner of State Highway 79 South and Margarita Road at Albertson's Shopping Center. Scheduled for DRC on September 2d, 2001. R:Vv10NTHLY.RPT2001V\ugust 2001.doc Cingular Wireless -Planning Application to: (1) repl restaurant with construction of a 35 foot high, 16 in incorporate concealed wireless communications ante palm to allow construction of a 9 foot x 16 foot (144 stucco and paint finish to match adjacent trash enclo; side of State Highway 79 South, and west of Redhawk Vail Ranch/Stater Brothers Shopping Center. RevieH • Romano's Macaroni Grill -Planning Application to con restaurant building within Bel Villaggio Commercial Ci southwest corner of Margarita road and North General • Woodcrest Children's Center -Proposal submitted on , Day Care Center to be located in Planning Area 34 of corner of Pauba and Margarita. The project has been September 20, 2001. e an existing flag pole at McDonalds' diameter structure flag pole that will as, and (2) relocate an existing queen luare foot) equipment enclosure with e. Project site is located on the south irkway at McDonalds Restaurant within 3 application. a 6,900 square foot free-standing The project site is located at the iey Road. Reviewing application. 21, 2001 fora 9,993 square foot ~ma Del Sol Specific Plan at the sled for DRC on • Wolf Creek Tentative Tract Map No. 29798 - This a plication is a proposal to subdivide Planning Areas 1, 2, 5, 6 and 9 into 631 dwelling units.~This project is still under review and anticipates Planning Commission review in October. Small Business Assistance • The Emporium Building: Staff made a site visit to this Man Street landmark in order to help the sign designer and building owner develop a new sign program which will be in compliance with the Old Town Specific Plan and improve the overall appgarance of this complex. • Land and Sea Marine: Planning Staff is working with the designer of new signs for this business located in Old Town and will schedule a hearing with the Old Town Local Review Board to review the proposal. Redevelopment will fund this project through the Fagade Improvement program. • Country Home/Country Garden: Helped owner of this proposed Main Street business in Old Town submit an application for landscaping, signs, paint. and fagade improvements. • Cobblestone Cottage: Staff met with the owner of this sign program possibilities with her. • Old Town Sunglasses and Jerky: Staff has continued business deal with their sign company and obtain fui Improvement Program. Special Event Permits Town business and discussed new td the owners of this new Otd Town for this project through the Fagade • 25`h Annual Great Temecula Tractor Race: Staff advised the Temecula Town Association (TTA~ regarding its planning application and prepared site plans forthis event to be held on October 5 and 6`" at the Northwest Sports Complex. Organizational meetings are being held on a regular basis with the TTA and all City departments involved. • Race For The Cure: Assisted this organization in prel closures and temporary use permit. Staff has scheduled f applications for this for street lar meetings with organizers and R:w10NTHLY.RPT~2001 Wugust 2001.doc City departments in order to monitor progress for this Promenade Mall. • Mexican Independence Day Celebration: City Staff he permission and obtain insurance coverage for this Old for September 15'h but will now take place in mid-Octc Special Projects & Long Range Planning Activities to be held October 21, 2001 at the organizers secure property owner's n event. It was originally scheduled The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale aid longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities are as follows: • Housing Element Update: The City has received the comments of the State Department of Housing and Community Development and is preparing the draft Element for the Planning Commission's consideration. The remaining issues with HCD are local land costs, unit affordability and their relationship to the allowable densities. • Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City hold pending the update of a General Plan Circulation • Comprehensive General Plan Update: The Council committee into the process. The final composition determined while the consultant works on the backpro • Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance: scheduling this item for a Planning Commission v additional staff resources. Plan: This activity is on directed staff to add an advisory the committee is currently being analysis. changes are being made prior to gyp. This item is on hold pending • Surface Mining Ordinance: The staff and City Attorney h d been making final changes based upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item~to the Council for their consideration. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. • Application Fee Study: Staff has provided ii Department about changes to our current fee information. • Hillside Development Policy: The policies are t grading ordinance. This item is on hold pending • Multi-species Habitat Conservation Planning Efforts for Naggar and Planning Staff are attending committee n determining conservation reserve needs. • Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance: The Ordinance amendment at their February 2, 2000 mee resources. • County Project Reviews: Staff continues to allocate si within the County and other local jurisdictions that to the consultant and Finance and is currently awaiting revised fined for integration into the draft- staff resources. Riverside County: Councilman and monitoring the process of Wing Commission considered this This item is on hold pending staff it resources to review projects affect the City of Temecula. R:WIONTHLY.RPT2007 Wugust 2001.doc Information regarding these projects will be forwarded Concern. • Southside Specific Plan: This item is on hold pending separate cover labeled Projects of staff resources. • Development Code Amendment: Was presented to the Planning Commission at its August 15, 2001 hearing. It will be heard September 25, 2001 by the City Council. • Crystal Ridge Rezoning: Staff is in the process of c Ridge area to see if there is support to change the zon to facilitate a more office-style of development. The more than 50,000 square feet. • City -Project environmental reviews and permitting: o Butterfield Stage Road (NEPA) o Temecula Library o Advance Acquisition Authorization for N o Long Valley Channel Maintenance o City Hall Emergency Generator (AQMD General Plan Amendments • Rancho Highlands Drive has been scheduled for City September 25, 2001. • A request to reduce the size of Via Industria (W Alvarado has been submitted and has been on Circulation Element. • Eli Lilly General Plan Amendment -staff has been mee and Guidant on a future GPA in this area. The current the land use designations on about half of the area. • Villages of Temecula Initial Study still in review. Geographic Information Svstem (GIST Activities • The City unveiled its web-based GIS program to the p meeting. This program allows the public to access GIS • Staff has been conducting field verifications of street add geocode the City's street centerline data. ~ property owners in the Crystal Light Industrial to Business Park LI zone limits office buildings to Court properties (NEPA) ng requirements) ncil consideration on Bypass Corridor) north of Avenida pending the approval of a revised with representatives from Eli Lilly osal would only involve changing at the August 14`" City Council ration from the City's web page. throughout the City in order to • The City hosted a quarterly Global Positioning System (CAPS) user's group meeting. • Recent mapping products include: - Aerial vicinity maps for City Manager - Potential bus route map for Council Member Pratt - Updated the RV ordinance implementation map R:WIONTHLY.RPT~2001 Wugust 2001.doc 6 - Area school map for TCSD - Old Town Specific Plan map and Tourist Retail CorE - Interchange map for Public Works - Vail Ranch area maps for Finance - Updated City Council and Planning Commission del - Hwy 79 S aerial vicinity map for Building & Safety - Rod Run 2001 map for Planning and Fire - Vicinity, land use, zoning maps for selected project - Vicinity maps for the Public Works Department - Analysis of surrounding property owners near NW S - Updates to the Zoning and General Plan Land Use I - TracUparcel map area maps for Public Works - Township and Range maps for Planning - Regional map and directions for City Clerks Office - Old Town vicinity maps for Redevelopment - Fire response areas maps for unincorporated areas • Staff continues with ongoing data layer development cc: Grant Yates Aaron Adams Gloria Wolnick map for Redevelopment route maps for Planning for Planning staff Park for City Manager's Office for the Planning Department of the City maintenance. R:UNONTHLY.RPT12001 Wugust 2001.doc ROVAL ATTORNEY :TOR OF FIN E MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building DATE: September 25, 2001 SUBJECT: Departmental Report -Building Month of August Safety PREPARED BY: Carol Brockmeier, Administrative TOTAL NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED .....................1.............................................237 NSFR .................................................................................................................60 NCOM ..................................................................................................................2 TOTAL VALUATION ..................................................., ............................... $15,622,185 TOTAL NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS PERFORMED .......................I.....................................................4812