Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout091101 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title III AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 -7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 11:00 P.M. 6:30 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: 42380 Zevo Drive; Negotiation Parties: Temeka Advertising and City of Temecula; Under negotiation: Terms and conditions of a development agreement affecting real property interests with Temeka Advertising. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2001-14 Resolution: No. 2001-78 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Prelude Music: Eve Craig Invocation: Rabbi David Barnett of Congregation B'Nai Chaim of Murrieta Flag Salute: Troop No. 911 ROLLCALL: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comemhero PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Boys and Girls Club Presentation R:\Agenda\091101 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICETO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Resolution Approvinq List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report as of July 31,2001 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 2001. R:~Agenda\091101 2 7 Financial Statements for the fiscal year endinq June 30, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001; 4.2 Approve an appropriation of $162,000 to the sales tax reimbursement line item in the General Fund; 4.3 Approve an appropriation of $79,000 in the City Attorney line item in the General Fund. Mobile Mappinq/First Response RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the three-phase Mobile Mapping/First Response software license and maintenance support purchase from Plant Equipment for a total amount of $72,414; 5.2 Approve the appropriation of funds in the amount of $109,864 for the purchase of software from Plant Equipment and hardware to be purchased with a separate RFP. Acceptance of a Park Improvement Bonds and Aqreement for Park Site A in the Crowne Hill Development RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Crowne Meadows, L.P., a Washington limited partnership to develop Park Site A in the Crowne Hill Development. Acceptance of certain public streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-6 (located north of Rancho California Road, east of Marqarita Road, and south of Honors Drive, and within the Marqarita Villa.qe Specific Plan No. 199- Temeku Hills Subdivision) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-6) R:~Agenda\091101 3 8 10 Acceptance of certain public streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-7 (located north of Honors Drive, east of Margarita Road, and south of the Metropolitan Water District Fee Riqht-of-Way, and within the Marqarita Villaqe Specific Plan No. 199- Temeku Hills Subdivision) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-7) Acceptance of certain public streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 24182-1 (located north of State Hiqhway 79 South, east of Campanula Way, south of DePortola Road, west of Butterfield Staqe Road, and within the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219 in the Paseo Del Sol Subdivision) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 24182-1) Parcel Map No. 30208 (located on the northwest corner of Overland Drive and Marqarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 30208 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 10.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the bond; 10.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. R:~Agenda\091101 4 11 Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Temecula Fall Rod Run 2001 Event in Old Town 12 13 14 (Old Town Front Street between Moreno Road and Second Street and other related 15 streets) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN 2001 EVENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT Clean Cities Memorandum of Understandinq (MOU) Renewal RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) renewal between the City of Temecula and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) regarding the participation in the Clean Cities Program. Comment Letter on the Riverside County Circulation Element RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the comment letter for transmittal to the Riverside County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. Comment Letter on the Domeni.qoni-Barton Specific Plan No. 310 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the comment for transmittal to the Riverside County Planning Commission. Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations and Appropriation for Additional Telephone Equipment RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Award a contract for Pentium-based computer workstations to Think! Computer Products of Irvine, California, in the amount of $39,054.75; 15.2 Appropriate $40,000 from Development Impact Fees - Corporate Facilities that will include $22,482 for the purchase of additional telephone equipment. R:~Agenda\091101 5 16 Award of Contract for HP Procurve Network Switches RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Award a contract for HP Procurve Network Switches to Sys Technology, Inc. of Cypress, California, in the amount of $35,672.30. 17 Community Services Grant Aqreement with the Temecula Sister City Association RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve a Community Services Grant Agreement with the Temecula Sister City Association in the amount of $10,000 for fiscal year 2001-02. 18 Second Readinq of Ordinance No. 01-13 (Prima Facie Speed Limit on Meadows Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled; ORDINANCE NO. 01-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 10.28.01(D) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON MEADOWS PARKWAY BETWEEN LA SERENA WAY AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:~Agenda\091101 6 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2001-15 Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Financial Statements for the fiscal year endinq June 30, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001. DISTRICT BUSINESS 2 S.M.A.R.T. Proqram Presentation RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the report and video presentation regarding the Summer Months Activities and Recreation in Temecula (S.M.A.R.T.) program. R:~Agenda\091101 7 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, September 25, 2001, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~genda\091101 8 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2001-06 CALLTO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item no.~t on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECQMMENDATION: 1.2 Approve the minutes of August 28, 2001. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, September 25, 2001, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\091101 9 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 19 Development Code Amendment (Planninq Application No. 01-0120 - non profit- clubs and Iodqe meetinq hails, compact parkinq spaces, courtesy curbs, temporary si.qna.qe, minimum lot area, and commercial buildinq offsets) RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE TYPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE COUNCIL BUSINESS 20 Butterfield Staqe Road/CETAP Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 20,1 Receive and file the report. 21 Appointment of Members to the General Plan Community Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CREATING THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMI'i-FEE AND SETrlNG FORTH THEIR DUTIES AND TERMS 21.2 Appoint the remaining members of the General Plan Community Advisory Committee. R:~Agenda\091101 10 22 Future City Hall Site Selection RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Appoint an ad hoc committee to participate in the site selection process for a future City Hall; 22.2 Provide direction to staff to prepare a Request for Qualification (RFQ) to hire a consultant to lead this selection process. 23 Consideration of an Interim Fire Station - Southside of Temecula (At the request of Councilman Stone.) RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Oral presentation to be provided by Councilman Stone. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, September 25, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\091101 11 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $3,444,250.68. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 11th day of September, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2OO1/Resos 01- 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 11th day of September, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 00/23~01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 08/30/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/11/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 08~J0/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 09111101 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 162 193 194 210 261 250 3OO 620 330 34O 46O 47O GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COt~WIUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACIETIES CFD 8~12 DEBT SVC FUND CFD 98-1 DEBT SVC FUND 100 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 100 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 1622 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 2500 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY~IP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FAClLmES TOTAL BY FUND: SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER 2,200,094.85 848,943.25 252,233.46 $ 3,444,250.68 902,375.29 9,446.82 152,476.68 32.46 00,077.26 5,275.26 173,485.52 3,374.00 8,424.22 21,124.20 1,484.50 1,043,864.22 177,863.25 4,500.37 50,624.37 54.07 2,911.08 494.18 844.74 7,284.11 2,002.14 4,420.40 252,233.46 $ 3,444,250.68 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. · HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 08/23/01 12:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOi4/MO0 SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 52,058.45 4,602.00 17,488.83 7,761.10 5,000.00 24,120.54 3,300.00 3,306.65 3,407.98 10,757.02 405.03 2,771.52 134,979.12 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 08/23/01 12:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 71032 08/22/01 000488 KNOTTS BERRY FARM 71032 08/22/01 000488 KNOTTS BERRY FARM 71035 08/23/01 004148 A T & T DAYCAHp EXCURSION ADULT TCKTS 190-183-999-5340 320.00 DAYCAMP EXCURSION CHILD TCKTS 190-183-999-5340 1,107.00 LONG DISTANCE SVC: CITY HALL 320-199-999-5208 128.62 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 420.00 71036 08/23/01 003799 ALKHAS, JACQUELYN RAE 71057 08/23/01 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, SEPT STORAGE UNIT Cl15 RENT 001-162-999-5254 140.00 71037 08/23/01 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, SEPT STORAGE UNIT B109 RENT 001-162-999-5234 140.00 71037 08/25/01 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, AUT/SEPT STORAGE UNIT Blll RNT 320-199-999-5238 248.00 71038 08/23/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 07/07 CRAMER 190-186-999-5118 163.80 71038 08/23/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 07/21 CRAMER 190-186-999-5118 209.30 71038 08/23/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/04 WYTRYKUS 001-162-999-5118 400.40 71038 08/23/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/04 CRAMER 190-186-999-5118 213.85 71038 08/23/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/04 CONTRERAS 001-140-999-5118 263.25 71038 08/23/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/04 ROSS 280-199-999-5118 208.00 71038 08/23/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/04 ROSS 165-199-999-5118 208.00 71039 08/23/01 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE 001-1665 823.30 71059 08/23/01 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIOERY TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE 001-1665 995.72 71040 08/25/01 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV R&R CURS @ R.CAL/I-15 RAMP 001-164-601-5402 2,285.00 71040 08/23/01 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV FENCE REPAIR & REMOVAL:MAIN ST 280-199-999-5250 1,665.00 71041 08/23/01 003126 BOOHGAARDEN, DENNIS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NIGHTS 280-199-999-5362 71042 08/23/01 004225 BURL SLONE COUNTRY MUSI 71043 08/23/01 002103 C A P I 0 ANNUAL DUES:GRANT YATES 001-110-999-5226 71044 08/23/01 004451 CA AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM FIRE ALARM SEM:ALBANESE:9/11 001-171-999-5261 71044 08/23/01 004451 CA AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM FIRE ALARM SEM:DAVIDSON:9/11 001-171-999-5261 71044 08/23/01 004451 CA AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM FIRE ALARM TEST:ROSALES:9/IO 001-171-999-5261 71045 08/23/01 001054 CALIF BUILDING OFFICIAL 71045 08/23/01 001054 CALIF BUILDING OFFICIAL 71046 08/23/01 000647 CALIF DEPT OF CONSUMER 71047 08/23/01 000413 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GA CALBO ANNUAL MTG:AE/PS/MH/ER 001-162-999-5258 DISABLED ACCESS GUIDEBOOKS 001-162-999-5228 ENGINEERS LICENSE:ROGALD PARKS 001-163-999-5226 ROUTINE MNTC R.C.ROAD:#1601 001-164-604-5271 EMPLOYEES FINGERPRINT CHECKS 001-150-999-5250 71048 08/23/01 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A 71049 08/23/01 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY I CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES:JUNE 300-2030 71049 08/23/01 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY I CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES:JUNE 500-2030 REFRESHMENTS:C.M.NONKING LUNCH 001-110-999-5260 REFRESHMENTS:C.M.WORKING LUNCH 001-110-999-5260 REFRESNMENTS:C.M.~ORKING LUNCH 001-110-99<2-5260 REFRESHMENTS:COUNCIL SUBCOMM 001-110-999-5260 230.40 50.00 175.00 385.00 385.00 145.00 775.00 77.00 160.00 129.50 714.00 366.78 2,310.98 37.44 36.74 41.14 26.93 71050 08/23/01 002534 CATERERS CAFE 71050 08/23/01 002534 CATERERS CAFE 71050 08/23/01 002534 CATERERS CAFE 71050 08/23/01 002534 CATERERS CAFE 1,427.00 128.62 420.00 528.00 1,666.60 1,819.02 3,950.00 230.40 50.00 1~.00 915.00 852.00 160.00 129.50 714.00 2,677.76 VOUCHRE2 08/23/01 12:36 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 2 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 71050 71051 71051 CHECK DATE 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 002534 CATERERS CAFE 001249 CENTRE FOR 096 EFFECTIV 001249 CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV ITEM DESCRIPTION REFRESHMENTS:5/24 PLANNING MTG VALUES-SH(FT CF:ROBERTS,G:9/20 ALUMNI EVENT:ELMO/SMITH:09/20 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-161-999-5260 001-140-999-5261 001-162-999-5261 ITEM /~J4OUNT 28.81 95.20 238.00 CHECK AMOUNT 171.06 333.20 71052 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71053 71054 71054 71054 71054 71054 71055 71056 71057 71058 71058 71058 71059 71060 71060 71060 71061 71062 71063 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 CHULA VISTA, CITY OF 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL 0037'35 CINGULAR WIRELESS (EQUI 0037'35 CINGULAR WIRELESS (EQUI 0037~5 CINGULAR WIRELESS (EQUI 003735 CINGULAR WIRELESS (EQUI 003735 CINGULAR WIRELESS (EOUI 004210 CIRCUIT CITY 002989 004017 004017 004017 002147 001923 001923 001923 004600 004123 CLAYTON, TRACY CLEAR I~GE WINDOW CLEA COMERCHERO, JEFF COHERCHERO, JEFF COHERCHERO, JEFF COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS CONVERSE CONSULTANTS CONVERSE CONSULTANTS CONVERSE CONSULTANTS COR VANDER HOUT D L PHAHES & ASSOCIATES DALEY, JAMES CCPA TRAINING CONSORTIUM FEES 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS 7/09-8/08/01 CELL PHONE SVCS MISC PCS PHONE EQUIPMENT MISC PCS PHONE EQUIPMENT MISC PCS PHONE EQUIPMENT MISC PCS PHONE EQUIPMENT M[SC PCS PHONE EQU(PMENT OLD TWN STOREFRONT COMPUTER REFUND:PARENT/NE SWIM LESSONS EXTERIOR WINDOU CLEANING REIMB:STEERING COMMITTEE:6/6 REIMB:US MAYORS:MICHIGAN:6/21- REIMB:RDA CF:MONTEREY:7/25-28 DEPST:SPOOKTACULAR 10/26 001-150-999-5248 001-120-999-5208 001-140-999-5208 001-161-999-5208 001-162-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 280-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-163-999-5208 001-164-601-5208 001-164-602-5208 001-164-604-5208 001-165-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-150-999-5208 330-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 001-170-999-5229 190-186-4970 340-199-701-5212 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 190-183-999-5370 GEOTECH SVCS:VACANT LAND SMN 210-2030 GEOTECH SVCS:PAVEMENT MGMT sYs 210-2030 GEOTECH SVCS:PAVEMENT MGMT SYS 210-2030 SR CENTER PIANO REPAIRS MONTHLY LEASE POLICE STOREFRNT VEHICLE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT 190-181-999-5301 001-170-999-5229 300-199-999-5207 590.00 216.36 60.04 500.02 753.10 1,061.22 77.93 224.81 362.95 433.77 108.92 55.07 653.46 277.24 720.70 56.90 65.26 9.68 19.35 564.14 9.68 48.38 591.24 25.00 385.00 37.23 17.00 6.00 150.00 2,250.00 15,122.52 1,145.48 70.00 1,661.73 730.22 590.00 5,627.75 651.23 591.24 25.00 385.00 60.23 150.00 18,518.00 70.00 1,661.73 730.22 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 08/23/01 12:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 71064 08/23/01 DENNIS CHINIAEFF & ASSO REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-1211 190-2900 100.00 100.00 71065 08/23/01 DLS CONSTRUCTORS, INC. REFUND: PCP PICNIC SHELTER 190-187-4988 100.00 100.00 71066 08/23/01 004192 DO,NS COMMERCIAL FUELIR FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 71066 08/23/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 001-120-999-5262 18.18 14.37 32.55 71067 08/23/01 001380 71067 08/23/01 001380 71067 08/23/01 001380 71067 08/23/01 001380 71067 08/23/01 001380 71067 08/23/01 001380 71067 08/23/01 001380 71067 08/23/01 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 71068 08/23/01 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R TEMP HELP ~/E 08/10 RUSH TEMP HELP W/E 08/10 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 08/10 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 08/10 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 08/10 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 08/10 OSHANN TEMP HELP ~/E 08/10 HERR TEMP HELP ~/E 08/10 MCCOY USER CONF:BEAL:7/9-13:SAR DIEG 001-161-999-5118 340-199-701-5118 001-120-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-171-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-610-5258 71069 08/23/01 003959 EVERETT & EVERETT PAINT RES IMPR PROM:VANCE, NATHAN 165-199-813-5804 71070 08/23/01 FAISON, KAREN 71070 08/23/01 FAISON, ICAREN REFUND:CRC RENTAL/DEPOSIT 190-2900 REFUND:CRC RENTAL/DEPOSIT 190-182-4990 71071 08/23/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IRC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230 71071 08/23/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-166-604-5230 71071 08/23/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-163-999-5230 71071 08/23/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 2,038.75 1,194.40 1,071.15 851.13 231.60 1,254.66 2,122.02 2,607.20 1,295.00 1,850.00 100.00 105.00 40.25 12.92 12.92 23.92 11,370.91 1,295.00 1,850.00 205.00 90.01 71072 08/23/01 001511 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOC PROF FINANCIAL ADVISOR:WOLF CK 001-2644 159.63 159.63 7107] 08/23/01 003174 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE ORE YR RENEWAL:STN 84 001-171-999-5228 28.97 28.97 71074 08/23/01 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS IRC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 491.14 491.14 71075 08/23/01 FRANK, YASMIN REFUND: TODDLER SWIM LESSORS 190-186-4970 25.00 25.00 71076 08/23/01 FRED FIEDLER & ASSOCIAT REFD:OVRPMT PERMIT B00-0531 001-2660 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENN]ES OFFJ~CE PRODUCT WORKSTATION FOR MINUTE CLERK 001-120-999-5242 71077 08/23/01 00017-/ GLERRIES OFFICE PRODUCT SIDE TABLE FOR WORKSTATION 001-120-999-5242 71077 08/2~/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SALES TAX 001-120-999-5242 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY CLERK 001-120-999-5220 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE 001-140-999-5220 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5220 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-BLDG SAFETY 001-162-999-5220 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5220 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-INFO SYSTEM 320-199-999-5221 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-RECORDS MGMT 001-120-999-5277 71077 08/23/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-ECO DEVEL 001-111-999-5220 GREATER WORKS CHURCH 71078 08/23/01 REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS00-2369 190-2900 189.19 55.08 18.32 448.94 411.28 17.33 155.18 59.99 ~..07 144.63 124.52 10.00 1,688.53 10.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 08/23/01 12:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 71079 08/23/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD HNTC 190-180-~9~-5212 71079 08/23/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-SPORTS 190-187-999-5301 7107~ 08/23/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 71079 08/23/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-BLDG&SAFETY 001-162-999-5242 71079 08/23/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-LAND DEVEL 001-163-999-5242 71079 08/23/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PW MNTC CREW 001-164-601-5218 71079 08/23/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC CREDIT:INVOICES PAID TWICE 190-180-999-5212 68.71 21.47 195.79 6.41 25.73 21.10 33.33- 305.88 71080 08/23/01 0023~2 HARMON, JUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 364.00 364.00 71081 08/23/01 HAYNES, TONYA REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982 71082 08/23/01 004525 HUMANSCALE ERGONOMIC SUPPLIES-BLDG&SAFETY 001-162-999-5215 71082 08/23/01 004525 HU~NSCALE FREIGHT 001-162-999-5215 71082 08/23/01 004525 HU~L~NSCALE SALES TAX 001-162~999-5215 71083 08/23/01 INLAND VALLEY FIL-AJ4 AS REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS95-2835 190-2900 30.00 984.00 75.11 69.30 100.00 30.00 1,128.41 100.00 71084 08/23/01 INTEL ECONC~41C DEVELOPM MEMBERSHIP:GLORIA WOLNICK 001-111'999-5226 325.00 325.00 71085 08/23/01 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-186-999-5250 38/*. 86 384.86 71086 08/23/01 004585 J M S COMMUNICATION ART WHERE MAGAZINE DESIGN & LAYOUT 001-111-~-5270 71086 08/23/01 004585 J N S CC~4MUNICATION ART SALES TAX 001-111-~9-5270 71087 08/23/01 J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM EXCURSION ON 9/12/01 MUSEUM 190-183-999-5350 1,271.80 95.39 100.00 1,367.19 100.00 71088 08/23/01 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE INC RECRUITMENT AD:MUSEUM SVCS MGR 001-150-999-5254 138.00 138.00 71089 08/23/01 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 08/05 DANIELS 001-161-999-5118 71089 08/23/01 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 08/12 DANIELS 001-161-999-5118 71090 08/23/01 KELLY, SUSAN REFUND:SPRT-SKYHWK TENNIS C~LMP 190-183-4982 418.95 206.15 64.60 625.10 64.60 71091 08/23/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CITY FAC 340-199-701-5250 71091 08/23/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CITY FAC 340-199-702-5250 71091 08/23/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CITY FAC 190-181-999-5250 71091 08/23/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CITY FAC 190-182-999-5250 71091 08/23/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC flVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CITY FAC 190-186-999-5250 71091 08/23/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CITY FAC 190-185-999-5250 71091 08/23/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC REPAIR HVAC a THE SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 71092 08/23/01 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 71092 08/23/01 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 71092 08/23/01 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 330-199-~-5220 71092 08/23/01 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MIBC SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5372 71093 08/23/01 KISGEN F~J4ILY TRUST REFUND:CANCEL PERMIT B01-1619 001-162-4203 71094 08/23/01 004051 L 0 R GEOTEC~NICAL GROU JUN GEOTECH SVCS:JEFFERSON PAd 210-2030' 71094 08/23/01 004051 L 0 R GEOTECHMICAL GROO GEOTECH SVCS:lST ST EXTENSION 280-199-807-5804 675. O0 37.50 37.50 453.75 93.75 112.50 120.00 41.12 13.71 284.94 21.50 566.25 5,535.00 677.50 1,530.00 361.27 566.25 6,212.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 08/23/01 12:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 71095 71096 71096 71096 71096 71097 71097 71098 71099 71099 71100 71101 71102 71102 71102 71102 71102 71102 71102 71102 71103 71103 71103 71104 71105 71106 71107 71108 71108 71108 71108 71109 71109 71110 71111 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER PANE 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 LINDSLEY, STEPHEN 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 I~L~INTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 003669 PARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI 003669 PARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI PARTINEZ, REBECCA 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA 004208 MILANOS MINEGAR CONTRACTING 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEPAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEPAN PRESS 001384. MINUTEPAN PRESS 001384. MINUTEPAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEPAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 002995 MYRON PANUFACTURING COR 002995 MYRON PANUFACTURING COR 002995 MYRON PANUFACTURING COR 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 004191 NORTH COUNTY TIMEB-PMT OASIS MINISTRIES OGILVIE, MARY 002105 OLD TCR~N TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 000733 PARTY PZAZZ 000733 PARTY PZAZZ PEOPLELINK 000247 PESTPASTER ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER REFUND: TODDLER SWIM LESSONS CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES PAINT FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES SR CTR CUSTOOIAL SUPPLIES RES IMPRV PRGM: GORDON RES IMPRV PRGM: SEETO REFUND:LEVEL 3 SWIM LESSONS 7/31-8/17/01 CONSULTING SVCS BILLING ADJ FOR CONSULT SVCS REFRESHMENTS:COUNCIL MTG:8/14 RFND:PW-CERT/CORRECT:LDO1034MP BLACK PRINT LETTERHEAD FOR HR SLACK PRINT CITY ENVELOPES HR SALES TAX LETTERHEAD FOR ECON DEV SECOND SHEETS SALES TAX B/W CITY ENVELOPES'ECON DEV SALES TAX PENCILS FOR TOURS/PRESENTATION GRAPE LOGO ONE TIME SET UP FEE SHIPPING AND HANDLING JUL DISPLAY ADS:VAR.CIP UPDATE RENEW ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-2032 190-2900 REFUND:PICNIC SHELTER CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & PAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & PAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & PAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT RENT BBQ FOR EE PICNIC 8/12/01 CLEANING/DELIVERY OF BBQ REFUND:BEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-2118 190-2900 R-O-W WEED SPRAYING-CITYWIDE 190-1~-4970 340-199-701-5212 190-182-999-5212 340-199-702-5212 190-181-999-5212 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 190-1~-4970 001-161-999-5248 001-161-999-5248 001-100-999-5260 001-163-4138 001-150-999-5222 001-150-999-5222 001-150-999-5222 001-111-999-5222 001-111-999-5222 001-111-999-5222 001-111-999-5222 001-111-999-5222 001-110-999-5250 001-110-999-5250 001-110-999-5250 001-165-999-5256 001-161-999-5228 190-187-4988 001-164-601-5214 001-164-601-5214 001-164-601-5214 001-164-601-5214 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5265 001-164-601-5402 ITEM AMOUNT 25.00 67.92 199.95 45.28 45.28 610.00 380.00 25.00 2,260.33 6.00 187.50 600.00 312.50 278.55 44.33 62.50 36.00 7.39 185.70 13.93 250.00 29.50 27.65 800.70 61.00 100.00 25.00 19.15 648.98 19.15 54.97 94.50 100.00 100.00 3,215.00 CHECK AMOUNT 25.00 358.43 990.00 25.00 2,266.33 187.50 600.00 940.90 307.15 800.70 61.00 100.00 25.00 742.25 194.50 100.00 3,215.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 08/23/01 12:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME iTEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71112 71114 71114 71115 71115 71115 71116 71117 71118 71119 71119 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/25/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/25/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000249 08/23/01 000252 08/23/01 000252 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH POLYCRAFT INC POLYCRAFT INC 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT COMPANY 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DiST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIHSURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIM8URSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIHBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIHBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5340 75.00 001-150-999-5265 11.81 190-183-999-5372 10.30 190-183-999-5372 19.59 190-184-999-5301 7.21 001-171-999-5261 15.00 001-171-999-5261 20.00 001-2175 10.74 001-110-999-5260 15.00 001-161-999-5260 5.00 001-161-999-5220 4.03 001-100-999-5260 20.90 001-170-999-5230 7,88 001-170-999-5220 31.16 190-180-999-5301 53.89 001-170-999-5242 6.76 001-170-999-5242 15.86 001-161-999-5222 25.29 001-161-999-5222 7.90 001-162-999-5222 21.07 001-161-999-5230 2.20 001-161-999-5222 6.55 001-110-999-5220 6.43 280-199-999-5260 24.00 190'183-999-5520 10.71 190-180-999-5301 19.41 190-18~'999'5372 30.32 001'171'999-5261 37.00 190-183-999-5320 8.47 001-2175 4.37 190-183-999-5320 6.43 190-183-999-5340 25.00 565.28 14" CITY SEALS FOR POLICE CARS 001-170-999-5214 SALES TAX 001-170-999-5214 JUL DISPLAY ADS:VAR.CIP UPDATE 001-165-999-5256 dUL DISPLAY ADS:VAR.TCSO EVENT 190-180-999-5254 JUL DISPLAY AD:SUMMER NIGHTS 280-199-999-5362 RES IMPRV PRGM: MURPHY 269,60 20.22 289.82 1,615.95 682.20 567.50 2,865.65 165-199-813-5804 775.00 775.00 CHAIRS FOR SUMMER NIGHTS 280-199-999-5562 PARTS FOR PW MAINT DIV BACKHOE 001-164-601-5215 VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS 14.40 14.40 72.26 72.26 190-180-999-5240 1,625.67 193-180-999-5240 7,761.10 9,386.77 71120 08/23/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 001-165-999-5214 7.00 71120 08/23/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAiLiNG & GAS 001-110-999-5214 14.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 08/23/01 12:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 71120 71120 71120 71120 71120 71120 71120 71121 71121 71122 71123 71124 71125 71126 71127 71128 71128 71129 71129 71129 71130 71131 71131 71131 71131 71132 71132 71132 71133 71133 71133 71133 71133 71133 71133 71133 71134 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 08/23/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS 003591 002110 RANDOL, DIANE RENES COHMERCIAL MANAGE RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RILINGTON BELLA VILLAGG 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC 001942 S C SIGNS 001942 S C SIGNS 003801 SELF~S JANITORIAL SERVI 003801 SELF~S JANITORIAL SERVI 003801 SELF~S JANITORIAL SERVI 003297 SKATE CITY 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 003836 SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COU ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEH]CLE FUEL CiTY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 001-110-999-5263 340-199-701-5263 340-199-701-5214 001-163-999-5214 001-161-999-5263 001-161-999-5214 001-164-601-5214 DUP 8LUEPRINTS:MAINT FAC MODS 210-190-158-5804 DUP BLUEPRINTS:lST ST BRIDGE 280-199-807-5804 REFUND:SUMMER DAY CANP 190-182-4984 R-O-W WEED SPRAY & ABATEMENT 001-164-601-5402 RENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR PW 001-164-601-5238 REFUHD:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-2000 190-2900 APERTURE CARDS DUPLICATES 001-163-999-5250 MOBILE RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 JUL PUBLIC gTC SIGNS:CTY CLERK 001-120-999-5244 JUL PUBLIC gTC SIGNS:PLANNING 001-161-999-5256 JUL PARKS JANITORIAL SERVICES JUL TES POOL JANITORIAL SVCS JUL 6TH ST JANITORIAL SVCS 190-180-999-5250 190-186-999-5250 001-164-603-5250 DAY CAMP EXCURSION 8/02/01 190-183-999-5340 S.M.A.R.T. PRGM SUPPLIES S.M.A.R.T. PRGM SUPPLIES S.N.A.R.T. PRGM SUPPLIES S.M.A.R.T, PRGN SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5372 190-183-999-5372 190-183-999-5372 190-183-999-5372 AUG 2-21-518-0340 HWY 79 190-180-999-5319 AUG 2-21-560-5874 MARGARITA 190-180-999-5319 JUL 2-19-999-9442 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5319 CHAPEL PEST CONTROL SERVICES 190-185-999-5250 CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SERVICE 340-199-701-5250 CRC PEST CONTROL SERVICES TCC PEST CONTROL SERVICES MAINT FAC PEST CONTROL SERVICE MUSEUM PEST CONTROL SERVICES SR CTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES PALA PARK PEST CONTROL SERVICE 190-182-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-185-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 ANNUAL CiTY MEMBERSHIP DUES 001-111-999-5226 ITEM AMOUNT 44.44 45.42 25.00 7.00 55.89 14.00 31.00 67.54 22.32 75.00 4,950.00 272.21 100.00 25.80 341.41 390.00 650.00 3,440.00 210.00 210.00 324.00 26.56 9.32 39.38 9.32 46.06 55.09 553.82 32.00 56.00 90.00 36.00 40.00 42.00 29.00 49.00 95.00 CHECK AMOUNT 243.75 89.86 75.00 4,950.00 272.21 100.00 25.80 341.41 1,040.00 3,860.00 324.00 84.58 654.97 374.00 95.00 VOUCHRE2 08/23/01 12:36 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE 71135 08/23/01 000293 STADIUM PIZZA 71136 08/23/01 71136 08/23/01 71137 08/23/01 000574 SUPERTONER 71137 08/23/01 000574 SUPERTOHER 71137 08/23/01 000574 SUPERTONER 71138 08/23/01 003828 TANGRAH INTERIORS 71138 08/23/01 003828 TANGRAN ]NTERIORS 71138 08/23/01 003828 TANGRAM INTERIORS 71139 08/23/01 000305 TARGET STORE 71139 08/23/01 000305 TARGET STORE 71140 08/23/01 71141 08/23/01 71142 08/23/01 71143 08/23/01 TEMECULA VALLEY ELK LOD 71144 08/23/01 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 71144 08/23/01 004274 TEMEDULA VALLEY SECURIT 71145 08/23/01 71146 08/23/01 002111 71147 08/23/01 004563 71148 08/23/01 003228 71149 08/23/01 004578 UNDERWATER SOLUTIONS 71149 08/23/01 004578 UNDERWATER SOLUTIONS 71150 08/23/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 71150 08/23/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 71150 08/2~/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 71150 08/23/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 71151 08/23/01 000621 71152 08/23/01 WILLIE, KAREN 71153 08/23/01 WITTEMAN, HOPE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFRESHMNTS:CONCERT SERIES MTG 000465 STRADLEY, HARY KATHLEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 000465 STRADLEY, HARY KATHLEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS SEPT HP PRINTER MAINT SERVICE HP PRINTER SUPPLIES HP PRINTER SUPPLIES PEDESTAL FILE FOR PLANNING DELIVER AND INSTALL SALES TAX SPECIAL EVENTS RED SUPPLIES REC SUPPLIES FOR TEEN PRGM TAYLOR, HARY REFUND:LEVEL 3 SWIM LESSONS 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY S.M.A.R.T. PRGN AWARDS TEMECULA VALLEY BAPTIST REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS96-0148 REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS99-0592 CRC LOCKSMITH SERVICES CITY HALL LOCKSMITH SERVICES 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TOGOS RESTAURANT REFRESHMEHTS:C.M, MTG:8/16/01 TRUMAN DOUR SYSTEMS ]NC RES INPRV PRGM: JACOBS U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL TRUSTEE ADMIN FEES CFD 88-12 CRC POOL PLASTER REPAIR CRC POOL PLASTER REPAIR AUG XXX-O073 GENERAL USAGE AUG XXX-O074 GENERAL USAGE AUG XXX-356~ ALARM AUG XXX-5072 GENERAL USAGE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC "CLEANEST CO.IN WEST" CAMPAIGN REFUND:PARENT/NE SWIM LESSONS REFUND:SPRTS-SKYHWK SOCCER CMP ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 001-161-999-5242 001-161-999-5242 001-161-999-5242 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5320 190-186-4970 190-183-999-5372 190-2900 190-2900 190-182-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 190-183-999-5330 001-110-999-5260 165-199-813-5804 261-199-999-5227 190-186-999-5212 190-1&5-999-5212 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 194-180-999-5250 190-186-4970 190-183-4982 ITEM AMOUNT 119.83 520.00 380.00 587.32 649.30 209.63 291.92 ~.00 27.52 46.17 45.12 25.00 69.08 100.00 100.00 91.39 200.00 156.00 74.31 779.00 3,300.00 299.00 249.00 1,692.76 221.49 48.07 5,540.58 5,000.00 25.00 97.00 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 119.83 900.00 1,446.25 394.44 91.29 25.00 69.08 100.00 100.00 291.39 156.00 74.31 ~79.00 3,300.00 548.00 7,502.90 5,000.00 25.00 97.00 TOTAL CHECKS 134,979.12 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 9 08/30/01 13:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SEI ASIDE 190 CONMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C: 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES 660 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 470 CFD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND TOTAL AHOLINT 251,209.52 36,671.85 32.66 1,6~8.16 275.26 79,595.05 74.00 5,117.57 17,716.22 6,910.62 1,070.47 10,068.63 1,043,866.22 750,987.00 2,208,096.85 VOUCHRE2 08/30/01 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10830 10831 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 95011 13:32 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESv RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS £MPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 460-1040 CFD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 470-1040 ITEM AMOUNT 1,043,864.22 750,987.00 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 26,235.74 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 685.96 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,84.1.21 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 11.19 000246 PERS RET 193-2~90 406.06 000246 PERS RET 194o2390 97.76 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 294.87 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 139.55 000246 PERS RET 320-2130 26.51 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 1,126.01 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 216.19 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 586.05 000246 PERS-PHE 001-2130 182.91 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 88.59 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.87 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 19.09 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .05 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.81 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .36 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .92 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 3.72 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 1.39 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.54 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 32,828.29 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 663.87 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 6,916.26 389385 08/30/01 000283 INBTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 14.39 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 347.71 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 119.79 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 268.46 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 89.34 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 1,241.02 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX CIRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 260.60 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 599.07 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 6,515.18 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 143.88 389385 08/30/01 00028~ INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,782.23 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 2.20 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 99.46 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 19.44 389385 08/30/01 000283 [NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 60.38 389385 08/30/01 00028~ INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 28.14 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 253.64 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 70.6/* 389385 08/30/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 153.16 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 1,043,86~.22 750,98?.00 34,970.91 52,477.15 1 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 08/30/01 13:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 001-2070 131.12 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070 1.43 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 238.42 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 2.73 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 5.04 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 7.78 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 3.89 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 8,732.33 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 179.44 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 1,433.49 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 4.53 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 81.13 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 37.21 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 ~.29 389419 08/30/01 000444 ]NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 22.08 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 271.86 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 56.74 389419 08/30/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 135.87 71156 08/30/01 001515 A S A p TRUCK,TRACTOR/F WEED ABATEMENT SVCS:CITYWIDE 001-161-999-5440 71157 08/30/01 002038 ACTION POOL & SPA SUPPL CRC POOL MNTC SUPPLIES 190-186-999-5212 18,612.09 7.96 11,411.38 18,612.09 7.96 71158 08/30/01 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 71158 08/30/01 00287? ALTA LOHA CHARTER LINES DAY CAMP BUS SVC:MOVIES BUS SVC:KNOTTVS BERRY FARM 190-183-999-5340 190-183-999-5340 71159 08/30/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/11 SMITH 001-162-999-5118 71159 08/30/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/11 WYTRYKUS 001-162-999-5118 71159 08/30/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 08/11 CONTRERAS 001-140-999-5118 71160 08/30/01 004561 AUDIO EVOLUTION INSTALL VEHICLE PCS HANDS FREE 320-199-999-5215 320.80 1,593.98 280.80 572.00 397.80 282.00 1,914.78 1,250.60 282.00 71161 08/30/01 004206 BANUELOS, TERESA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 170.00 170.00 71162 08/30/01 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV R&R PCC SPANDREL & AC TRADEWTR 001-166-601-5402 71162 08/30/01 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV R&R PCC SPANDREL & AC TRADEWTR 001-16~-601-5402 71163 08/30/01 004273 BLUES TESTAMENT, THE ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NGT 8/17 280-199-999-5362 2,700.00 3,225.00 350.00 5,925.00 350.00 71164 08/30/01 004176 BROADWING LONG DISTANCE & INTERNET SVCS 320-199-999-5208 71165 08/30/01 002998 BRUNSWICK CAL OAKS BOWL TEAM BUILDING FOR CITY CLERKVS 001-120-999-5261 1,195.00 100.00 1,195.00 100.00 71166 08/30/01 004225 BURL SLONE COUNTRY MUSI ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NGT 8/17 280-199-999-5362 71166 08/30/01 004225 BURL SLONE COUNTRY MUSI ENTERTAINMENT:8/24 ST PAINTING 280-199-999-5362 50.00 50.00 100.00 71167 08/30/01 003549 CALIF ASSN OF MUSEUMS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:WENDELL OTT 190-185-999-5226 100.00 100.00 71168 08/30/01 001089 CALIF DEBT & INVESTMENT INVESTING FUNDS CF:GR:10/25-26 001-140-999-5261 71169 08/30/01 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A JUL BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS SVC 001-170-999-5328 150.00 1,155.00 150.00 VOUCHRE2 08/30/01 13:32 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 71169 08/30/01 71170 08/30/01 71171 08/30/01 71172 08/30/01 71173 08/30/01 71174 08/30/01 71175 08/30/01 71176 08/30/01 71176 08/30/01 71177 08/30/01 71177 08/30/01 71177 08/30/01 71178 08/30/01 711;'8 08/30/01 71178 08/30/01 71178 08/30/01 71178 08/30/01 71178 08/30/01 71179 08/30/01 71180 08/30/01 71180 08/30/01 71181 08/30/01 71182 08/30/01 71183 08/30/01 71184 08/30/01 71185 08/30/01 71186 08/30/01 71187 08/30/01 71187 08/30/01 71188 08/30/01 71189 08/30/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A CREDIT:INCORRECTLY BILLED CASE 001-170-999-5328 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO MEMBERSHIP:C.L.ADKISSON-FLONR 190-180-999-5226 004604 CALPELRA 004093 001249 001249 001249 001249 003997 COAST RECREATION INC 003997 COAST RECREATION INC 003997 COAST RECREATION INC 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CNARIT 004405 004405 COHMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARZT 004405 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 001193 COMP U S A 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED IHt 002990 DAVID TURCN & ASSOCIATE 002701 DIVERSIFIED ~ISK 004171 DOMINO'S PIZZA 004579 DON SIDELL & ASSOCIATES DROTMAN, LORI 003223 EDAW INC 003223 EDAW INC 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE CANEZ, CASSANDRA CARDIO CARE PLUS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV ACADEMY ALUMNI SEM:PARKS:9/20 CENTRE FOR ORG EFEECTIV WORK ETHIC SEM:9/20:JONES CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV ~ORK ETHIC SEM:MEYER:09/20/01 CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV WORX ETHIC SEM:MEYER:09/20/01 ER LABOR TRAINING:ll/6-9:DL 001-150-999-5258 REIMB:BROCHURE SUPPLIES-POLICE 001-170-999-5242 190-183-999~5330 001-163-999-5261 001-120-999-5261 280-199-999-5261 165-199-999-5261 VARIOUS PLAYGROUND EQUIP PARTS 190-180-999-5212 FREIGHT SALES TAX CHC CHC CHC CHC CHC CHC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES KENWOOD BATTERY-PW MNTC SALES TAX CITYWIDE TRAFFIC COUNT DATA RETAIN ADVOCACY FIRM:FED FUND dUL SPECIAL EVENTS PREMIUMS REFRESNMENTS-S.M.A.R.T. PRGM CHAPARRAL POOL CONST MOMT SVCS REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP BIOLOGICAL SVC:PALA PW97-15 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-2120 190-2120 193-2120 194-2120 330-2120 340-2120 320-199-999-5242 001-164-601-5215 001-164-601-5215 001-16/*-602-5250 001-110-999-5248 300-2180' 190-183-999-5378 210-190-170-5804 190-182-498~ 210-2030 CREDIT:OVRSTATED MILEAGE CHRGE 210-165-631-5801 REFRESHMENTS:HARVESTON MTG 001-161-999-5260 JUL LDSCP REPAIRS:PALA PRK 190-180-999-5212 ITEM AHOUNT 70.00- 125.00 820.00 71.72 336.00 119.00 119.00 59.50 59.50 108.00 12.00 8.10 123.50 5.60 .60 .20 5.50 .60 458.82 232.00 17.40 600.00 2,500.00 933.46 206.14 4,161.50 165.00 2,797.06 37.50- 91.05 1,105.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 1,085.00 125.00 820.00 71.72 336.00 119.00 119.00 119.00 128.10 136.00 458.82 249.40 600.00 2,500.00 933.46 206.14 4,161.50 165.00 2,759.56 91.05 VOUCHRE2 08/30/01 13:32 VOUCHER/ CNECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 71189 08/30/01 71190 08/30/01 71190 08/30/01 71190 08/30/01 71190 08/30/01 71191 08/50/01 71191 08/30/01 71191 08/30/01 71191 08/30/01 71191 08/30/01 71192 08/50/01 71192 08/30/01 71195 08/30/01 71194 00/30/01 71194 08/30/01 71195 08/30/01 71195 08/30/01 71195 08/30/01 71196 08/30/01 71197 08/30/01 71198 08/30/01 71199 08/30/01 71199 08/30/01 71200 08/30/01 71201 08/30/01 71202 08/30/01 71202 08/30/01 71203 08/30/01 71204 08/30/01 71205 08/30/01 71206 08/30/01 71206 08/30/01 71206 08/30/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 000478 FAST SIGNS 000478 FAST SIGNS 000478 FAST SIGNS 000478 FAST SIGNS 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M 002528 GLASS BLASTERS 002528 GLASS BLASTERS 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 00017'7 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GONZALEZ~ CARl 004159 GOODENOUGH, DONNA 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 003956 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOHIC 003956 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOHIC 001517 INTEGRATED INSIGHTS DBA 001186 IRWIN, JOHN 004499 LESLIES POOL SUPPLY 004499 LESLIES POOL SUPPLY LOPEZ, TANYA 004087 LONERS 003054 LYNDE ORDWAY 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 003782 HAIN STREET SIGNS CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOUS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER JUL LDSCP SVCS= MEDIANS COLOR CITY SEAL-EXPLORER PRGM COLOR CITY SEALoEMERG MGMT SALES TAX SALES TAX LOT BOOK REPT-STALOWSKI 190-180-999-5415 001-170-999-5235 001-110-999-5278 001-170-999-5235 001-110-999-5278 165-199-999-5250 LOT BOOK REPT-41501 RIESLING C 165-199-999-5250 LOT BOOK REPT-MENDIEZ 165-199-999-5250 LOT BOOK REPT-LOPEZ 165-199-999-5250 LOT BOOK REPT-44601 JAMIN CIR 165-199-999-5250 XX-1405 UBNOSKE:UCR/MTGS/BOOKS 001-161-999-5260 XX-1405 UBNOSKE:UCR/MTGS/BOOKS 001-161-999-5228 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS CITY MUGS FOR NEW HIRES CITY MUGS FOR NEW HIRES OFFICE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM OFFICE SUPPLIEB-TCSD OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCC REFUND: SPORTS-BB FUND BEG TCSD ]NSTRUCTOR EARNINGS HARDWARE SUPPLIES:STATION 84 3RD ANNUL POLICY CF:IO/2:GY/JO 3RD ANNUL POLICY CF:IO/2:GY/dO EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ROPE FOR DELINEATE THE POOL FREIGHT REFUND: LEVEL 4 SWIM LESSONS HARDWARE SUPPLIES-STATION 84 PAPER FOLDER MNTC CONTRACT VARIOUS SIGN SUPPLIES "SCHOOL XING" SIGNS SIGN HARDNARE SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5250 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5265 190-185-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-18~-999-5220 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5330 001-171-999-5212 001-110-999-5260 001-111-999-5260 001-150-999-5248 190-183-999-5330 190-186-999-5301 190-186-999-5301 190-186-4970 001-171-999-5212 330-199-999-5217 001-16/*-601-5244 001-166-601-5244 ITEM AMOUNT 400.00 74.00 37.00 5.33 3.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 462.62 236.88 415.00 17.20 80.63 178.18 1,135.87 265.00 35.00 84.00 196.94 60.00 60.00 534.66 836.00 104.49 7.84 25.00 59.10 225.00 1,034.42 161.25 744.98 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 1,505.00 119.33 750.00 699.50 415.00 97.83 1,579.05 35.00 84.00 196.94 120.00 534.66 836.00 112.33 25.00 59.10 225.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 08/30/01 13:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOUS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 71207 71207 71207 71207 71208 71209 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71210 71211 71212 71213 71213 71214 71214 71214 71215 71216 71217 71218 71218 71218 71218 71218 71218 71218 71218 71219 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 004141 HAINTEX 004141 MAINTEX 004141 MAINTEX [NC 004141 HAINTEX INC 002046 MASTER K 9 INC 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTE~LRN PRESS 00138~ MINUTEI(RN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 00138~ MINUTEHAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 00138~ MINUTEMAN PRESS 00138/* MINUTEMAN PRESS 00138/* MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 00138/* MINUTEMAN PRESS 00138~ MINUTEMAN PRESS 004534 MOTIENT SERVICES INC 000230 MUNIFINANCIAL 004152 O~MALLEY ENGINEERING CO 004152 O~MALLEY ENGINEERING CO 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 004491 OLD TYME FOLK 003299 OLDER THAN DIRT GANG 001619 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING CONPAN 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING CONPAN 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING CONPAN PACIFIC CAPITAL INVESTM ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT TCC CUSTOOIAL SUPPLIES SR CTR CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 190-184-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 POLICE K-9 TRAINING FY 01/02 001-170-999-5327 SALES TAX-MINOLTA 2010 COPIER 190-182-999-5239 BUSINESS CARDS:A.ELMO 001-162-999-5222 SALES T/O( 001-162-999-5222 BUS.CARDS:PARKER/RUSE/MCCARTHY 190-180-999-5222 BUSINESS CARDS:J.LAWRENCE SALES TAX CITY LETTERHEAD:FINANCE B/W CITY ENVELOPES:FINANCE BLANK SHEETS:FINANCE SALES TAX WINDOW ENVELOPES:FINANCE SALES TAX BUSINESS CARDS:F.CARRANZA SALES TAX 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 330-199-999-5250 330-199-999-5250 AUG AIRTIME-SATELLITE PHONE 001'110-999-5278 JUL-SEP CITYWIOE ASSESSMNT SVC 190-180-999-5370 PROF SURVEYING SVC:MARG RD PROF SURVEYING SVCS:MARG RD 210-165-706-5804 210-165-706-5804 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & )tAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 001-165-999-5214 001-164-601-5214 ENTERTAINMENT:SMR NIGHTS:8/24 280-199-999-5362 ENTERTAINMENT:SMA NIGHTS:8/24 280-199-999-5362 RECRUIT AD:ASST.DIR.FINANCE 001-150-999-5254 MOBILE RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES HOLIDAY PENCIL ASSORTMENT HOLIDAY STICKER ASSORTMENT JINGLE BELL BRACELETS LIGNT BULB CANDLES FREIGHT SALES TAX 190-183-999-5320 190-184-999-5301 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD98-131GR 001-2670 109.25 109.25 109.25 6.17 900.00 35.57 106.60 7.99 319.80 39.75 26.97 125.00 185.70 36.00 26.00 262.71 19.70 39.75 2.98 181.18 5,357.64 1,123.20 1,877.50 19.15 47.69 75.88 100.00 200.00 380.76 301.10 15.90 11.95 14.95 7.95 23.90 8.95 1.65 995.00 333.92 900.00 35.57 1,198.95 181.18 5,357.6~ 3,000.70 142.72 100.00 200.00 380.76 386.35 995.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 08/30/01 13:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCNER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE HUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 71220 08/30/01 001958 PEAS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 71221 08/30/01 003155 PRICE CHOPPER INC ~RISTBANDS FOR AQUATICS 71222 08/30/01 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAO OOUR RES IMPRV PRGM: JONES 71223 08/30/01 004494 RAMONA TIRE INC 71223 08/30/01 004494 RAMONA TIRE 71223 08/30/01 004494 RAMONA TIRE 71224 08/30/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 71224 08/30/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER OIST 71224 08/30/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 71225 08/30/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE OETAILING 71226 08/30/01 RBF CONSULTING 71227 08/30/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT 71227 08/30/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT 71227 08/30/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 71228 08/30/01 002412 NICNAROS WATSON & GERSN 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSN 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSN 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 71228 08/30/01 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 71229 08/30/01 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE 71Z30 08/30/01 001365 RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN 71230 08/30/01 001365 RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN 71231 08/30/01 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW 71231 08/30/01 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW 71232 08/30/01 004296 RORY RIECK WEED ABATEME 71232 08/30/01 004296 RORY RIECK WEED ABATEME 71233 08/30/01 004460 SILVERADO BLUEGRASS BAN 71234 08/30/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 7123~ 08/30/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 71234 08/30/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 71~.~4 08/30/01 000645 SMART & FINAL /NC 71234 08/30/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC PAGE 6 ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 001-2122 83.99 83.99 190-186-999-5301 192.00 192.00 165-199-813-5804 1,400.00 1,400.00 REPAIRS FOR FIRE DEPT VEHICLES 001-171-999-5214 CREDIT:~J TO PREV. INVOICE 001-171-999-5214 CREDIT:ADJ TO PREV. INVOICE 001-171-999-5214 692.02 7.65- 31.37- 317.12 68.51 100.00- AUG 01-99-02003-0 FLOATING HTR 001-164-601-5250 AUG 02-79-10100-1NW SPORTS PK 190-180-999-5240 CREDIT:LATE FEE:01-99-02003-O 001-164-601-5250 001-162-999-5214 36.60 REFUND:BLDG PERMIT:B01-2313 001-162-4285 001-164-601-5242 001-164-601-5242 001-164-601-5238 PUBLIC ~ORKS ROLLER & VIB PLAT SALES TAX RENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR PW JUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 001-2030 JUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 165-2030 JUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 190-2030 JUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 300-2030 dUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 280-2030 JUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 210-2030 dUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 261-2030 JUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 001-2643 JUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 001-2642 JUN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 001-2644 RECORDING FEE:W.B.LIEN RELEASE 001-120-999-5250 RENEW ANNUAL PERMIT:S.H.PARK 190-180-999-5250 RENEW ANNUAL PERMIT:PALA PARK 190-180-999-5250 DIABETES WALK PATROL SVC:5/06 001-2030 TRAFFIC CONTROL SVCS:4/19/01 001-2030 001-161-999-5440 001-2030 WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES FY 00-01 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS ENTERTAINMENT:SMA NIGHTS:8/31 280-199-999-5362 190-183-999-5320 190-181-999-5301 190-181-999-5301 190-183-999-5373 190-183-999-5370 60.00 1,780.00 133.50 31.00 62,970.46 298.50 1,515.50 16,503.19 3,264.65 2,0?5.25 74.00 138.00 39,555.09 112.00 10.00 65.00 65.00 204.00 204.00 3,837.50 4,550.50 350.00 58.29 31.20 70.81 10.19 56.71 RECREATION SUPPLIES-TEEN PRGM RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR MPSC RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR MPSC SUPPLIES FOR HIGH HOPES PRGM RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR 10/26 653.00 285.63 36.60 60.00 1,944.50 126,506.64 10.00 130.00 408.00 8,388.00 350.00 227.20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 7 08/30/01 13:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71235 08/30/01 71236 08/30/01 71237 08/30/01 71237 08/30/01 71237 08/30/01 71238 08/30/01 71238 08/30/01 71239 08/30/01 71240 08/30/01 71240 08/30/01 71240 08/30/01 71240 08/30/01 71240 08/30/01 71241 08/30/01 71241 08/30/01 71241 08/30/01 71242 08/30/01 71242 08/30/01 71243 08/30/01 71244 08/30/01 71245 08/30/01 71246 08/30/01 71246 08/30/01 71246 08/30/01 71246 08/30/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EOISON 000537 SO CALIE EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 003836 SOUTBWEST RIVERSIDE COU 003836 SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COU 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS INC 004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION 004456 T & N CONSTRUCTION 004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION 004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION 004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION 000305 TARGET STORE 000305 TARGET STORE 000305 TARGET STORE 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004132 TRUCK HYDRAULIC EQUIPME 004244 TRUGREEN LAND CARE ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION HUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT AUG 2-11-007-0455 6TH ST 001-164-603-5240 AUG 2-10-747-1393 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 AUG 2-14-204-1615 FRNT ST ROIO 340-199-701-5240 AUG 2'18-937-3152 MUSEUM 190-185-999-5240 AUG 2-22-496-3439 WINCHESTER 190-180-999-5319 AUB 2-21-981-4720 H~Y 79 001-165-999-5250 AUG 2-02-351-4946 SR CTR 190-181-999-5240 AUG 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 AUG 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 AUG 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 AUG 2-18-049-6416 FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319 AUG 2-21-911-7892 SO.SIOE PKLT 001-16/*-603-5240 AUG 2-19-171-8566 WED CHAPEL 190-185-999-5240 AUG 2-22-934-9634 OIAZ 190'180-999-5319 AUG 2-22-934-9766 OIAZ 190-180-999-5319 AUG 2-20-817-9929 PD SATELLITE 001-170-999-5229 EMERG.GENERATOR PERMIT:01-16 210-165-612-5802 STN ~ PEST CONTROL SERVICES 001-171-999-5212 WEDDING CNAPEL PEST CONTROL SV 190-185-999-5250 MUSEUM PEST CONTROL SERVICES 190-185-999-5250 3RD QTR MTG:YATES/ADAMS/~OLNIC 001-110-999-5260 3RD QTR MTG:YATES/ADAMS/WOLNIC 001-111-999-5260 RES IMPRV PRGM: MURPHY 165-199-813-5804 PRGS PMT#4:NAINT FAC M005:0016 210-190-158-5804 RET.W/H PMT#4:MAINT FAC:O0-16 210-2035 REL.STOP NTC:MNTC FAC:STEEL TE 210-2038 STOP NOTICE:MAINT FAC:RAM-CO 210-2038 STOP NOTICE:MNTC FAC:STEEL TEC 210-2038 AQUATIC SUPPLIES RECREATZON SUPPLIES-TCSD EVENT RECREATION SUPPLIES-SMART PRGM 190-186-999-5301 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5372 RECOG.PLADUE FOR SVC:MCDERHOTT 001-140-999-5250 ADD~L ENGRAVING SVCS:MCDERMOTT 001-140-999-5250 MAINT FAC LOCKSMITH SVCS 340-199-702-5212 REAR TORSION BARS:PW BOOM TRCK 001-164-601-5214 REL.RET:SO.SIDE PRK LOT:98-16 210-2035 464.86 28.50 25.92 1,056.49 110.57 67.42 1,148.86 8,415.10 25.49 683.66 199.79 170.51 143.66 62.69 44.74 406.30 289.55 80.00 32.00 42.00 44.00 22.00 639.72 43,304.00 4,330.40- 5,600.00 11,900.00- 5,600.00- 85.67 75.17 6~.47 125.16 34.69 50.00 4,087.90 32,783.82 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 1,142.54 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 11.90 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 2,067.30 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 22.80 13,054.56 289.55 154.00 66.00 639.72 27,073.60 225.31 159.85 50.00 4,087.90 32,783.82 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 08/30/01 13:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 71246 71246 71246 71247 71247 71248 71248 71248 71248 71248 71248 71248 71248 71248 71248 71249 71249 71250 71251 71252 71253 71254 71255 71256 71256 71256 71257 CHECK DATE 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/50/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 08/30/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAHE 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 002899 UNISTRUT 002899 UNISTRUT 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITEO WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED UAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 004368 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATE 004368 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATE 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY WESTERN PLUMBING & DRA! 003756 WHITE HOUSE SANITATION 001601 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 003607 XPECT FIRST 003607 XPECT FIRST AID 003607 XPECT FIRST AID 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 000389 PT RETIR 320-2160 42.00 000389 PT RETIR 330-2160 64.90 000389 PT RETIR 340'2160 32.40 SIGH SUPPLIES-PW MAINT CREWS 001-164-601-5244 SALES TAX 001-164-601-5244 2,811.75 210.88 000325 UW 001-2120 127.05 000325 U~ 165-2120 8.75 000325 UW 190-2120 22.60 000325 UW 192-2120 .10 000325 UW 193-2120 2.20 000325 UW 194-2120 .50 000325 UW 280-2120 2.50 000325 uw 320-2120 5.00 000325 UW 330-2120 5.00 000325 UW 340-2120 .60 JUN TEMP INSPECT SVCS:LARSON 001-2030 JUN TEMP INSPECT SVCS:LARSON 001-2030 UTILITY RELOCATION:AQUATIC FAC 210-190-170-5804 CITY HALL LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 001-120-999-5228 REFUND:BLDG PERMIT:B01-2240 001-162-4285 AUG RESTROOM CLEAMING:BTRFLD 190-180-999-5250 MAY-AUG 99 EIR/TIA REVIEW SVCS 001-164-602-5248 APR-JUN BASE CHRG:2510 COPIER 330-199-999-5239 CITY HALL FIRST AID SUPPLIES 340-199-701-5250 PW FIRST AID SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FOR AQUATIC 190-186-999-5301 EMP COMPUTER PRGM: G. ZIGLER 001-11~ 1,627.89 9,883.61 7,451.07 96.21 30.00 50.00 361.67 123.00 63.33 69.55 393.62 505.24 3,383.84 3,022.63 174.30 11,511.50 7,451.07 96.21 30.00 50.00 361.67 123.00 526.50 505.24 TOTAL CHECKS 2,208,094.85 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 08/30/01 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COI4MUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND FACILITIES TOTAL N40UNT 599,107.32 98,316.00 80,668.00 69,769.93 1,082.00 / 8~8,943.25 / VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 1 08/30/01 15:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CNECK NUMBER 71260 71260 71260 71260 71260 71260 71260 71260 71260 71260 71260 71260 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71261 71262 71262 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 09/11/01 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002959 ENVIRONMERTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002959 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMERTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 004485 K E C ENGINEERING 004485 K E C ENGINEERING ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECX DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT MNTC:PRI~LARY ARC/INFO LICENSE 001-161-610-5217 MNTC:ARCPRESS FLOATING LICENSE 001-161-610-5217 LICENSE RENEWAL:MAP OBJECTS 001-161-610-5217 MNTC:ARCVIEW WINDOWS W/TEC SVC 001-161-610-5217 SALES TAX COMPAQ COMPUTER:GIS WRKSTN READ WRITE ZIP DRIVE PCI MOOEM ARCINFO 8.1 SOFTWARE:GIS SALES TAX SALES TAX 001-161-610-5217 001-161-610-5604 001-161-610-5604 001-161-610-5604 001-161-610-5604 001-161-610-5606 001-161-610-5606 001-161-610-5604 AUG LDSCP SVCS:NEIGHBORNO00 PK AUG LDSCP SVCS:SPORTS PARK AUG LDSCP SVCS:MEDIANS AUG LDSCP SVCS: CRC AUG LDSCP SVCS:SR CENTER AUG LDSCP SVCS:C.HALL/MNTC FAC AUG LDSCP SVCS:TCC AUG LDSCP SVCS:STATION 84 AUG LDSCP SVCS:PRKING LOT A AUG LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN STSCAPE AUG LDSCP SVCS:MUSEUM AUG LDSCP SVCS:CHILDREN MUSEUM AUG LDSCP SVCS:SOUTH SLOPES AUG LDSCP SVCS:NORTH SLOPES AUG LDSCP SVCS:PRKING LOT B JUL LDSCP SVC:NEIGHBORNOOD PRK JUL LDSCP SVC:SPORTS PRES JUL LDSCP SVC:HEDIAMS JUL LDSCP SVC:CRC JUL LDSCP SVC:SR CENTER JUL LDSCP SVC:C.NALL/MNTC FAC JUL LDSCP SVC:TCC dUL LOSCP SVC:STATION 84 JUL LSCP SVC:OLO TWN PRKLOT A 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 190-184-999-5415 001-171-999-5212 001-164-603-5415 001-164-603-5415 190-185-999-5415 190-188-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 001-164-603-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 190-184-999-5415 001-171-999-5212 001-164-603-5415 JUL LDSCP SVC:OLD TWN STRSCAPE 001-16~-603-5415 JUL LDSCP SVC:MUSEUM 190-185-999-5415 JUL LDSCP SVC:CNILDREN MUSEUM 190-188-999-5415 JUL LDSCP SVC:$OUTH SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 dUL LDSCP SVC:NORTH SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 dUL LDSCP SVC:OLD TWN PRKLOT B 001-164~603-5415 FINAL PMT:RC SPT PE PWOO-23CSD 210-190-178-5804 RETENTION:RC SPT PK P~OO-23CSD 210-2035 3,000.00 200.00 1,000.00 932.36 309.92 3,800.00 325.00 250.00 150.00 10,000.00 750.00 359.58 19,120.00 25,325.00 2,425.00 1,444.00 361.00 541.00 1~.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 285.00 155.00 25,556.00 14,778.00 250.00 19,120.00 25,325.00 2,125.00 1,444.00 361.00 541.00 193.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 285.00 155.00 25,556.00 14,T/8.00 250.00 10,474.55 298.73- 21,056.66 183,840.00 10,175.82 71263 09/11/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 58 FILM FESTIVAL BANNERS 001-111-999-5271 4,956.00 71263 09/11/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY IRC 18 RO0 RUN BANNERS 001-111-999-5271 1,759.00 71263 09/11/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC SALES TAX 001-111-999-5271 485.10 7,180.10 VOUGHRE2 08/30/01 13:51 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 71264 09/11/01 003697 71265 09/11/01 003591 71266 09/11/01 000955 71267 09/11/01 000406 71267 09/11/01 000406 71267 09/11/01 000406 71268 09/11/01 003599 71269 09/11/01 71270 09/11/01 71271 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA JUL DSGN SVCS:PAUBA RD IMPRV RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE ~EED AGATE/SPRAY/LITTER REMVL RIVERSIDE GO SHERIFF S~ dUL 2001 BIKE PATROL SERVICES 004368 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATE JUl TEMP INSPECT SVCS:LARSON 0037'30 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING FAINT 09/11/01 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC ANNUAL CITY MEMBERSHIP DUES ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-165-606-5802 001-16~-601-5402 001-170-999-5326 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 92-93/00-01 LA~ ENF.FAC.EXPENS 001-2030 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D GAL-ID FY01-02 AGENCY ASSESSMN 001-170-999-5286, RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D JULY 2001 BOOKING FEES 001-170-999-527'5 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL JUL DESIGN SVCS:MURR CRK:99-18 210-165-710-5802 001-165-999-5118 001-164-601~5402 001-100'999'5226 ITEM A~OUNT 6,128.00 5,300.00 10,057.03 459,757.03 40,888.00 13,910.40 53,466.11 11,762.00 16,497.10 8,925.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AHOUNT 6,128.00 5,300.00 10,057.03 514,555.43 53,466.11 11,762.00 16,497.10 8,925.00 TOTAL CHECKS 848,943.25 ITEM 3 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FI~kNCE~._ CITY MANAGER ,/~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance September 11, 2001 City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 2001 PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: of July 31, 2001. That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report which provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of July 31, 2001. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 2001 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of July 31,200t Cash Activit~ for the Month of July: Cash and investments as of July 1, 2001 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of July 30, 2001 65,797,574 3,879,084 ~4,698,13S) 64,978,520 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Institution Petty Cash General Checldng Sweep Account (Money Market Account) Benerd Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Certificate of Deposit (Retention Escrow) Vadous U.S. Bank (Retention Escrow) Checldng Account Union Bank (Parking Citations) Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 (Money Market Account) Reserve Account- CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp (Investment Agreement) Delinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp (Investment Agreement) Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1 (Money Market Account) Reserve Account- CFD 98-1 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-TCSD COPs (investment Agreement) Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-RDA Bonds (investment Agreement) City Hall Union Bank Union Bank (Highmark U.S. Treasury) Union Bank State Treasurer Community Bank . U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury} State Treasurer U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) Bayedsche Landesbank U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) Bayedsche Landesbank Yield n/a 2.780 tva 4.635 3.810 Various ~a 3.470 5.430 5.422 3.470 4.635 3.470 6.870 3.470 Maturity/ Termination Date ContractuaV Market Value Par/Book Balance 9/1/2017 9/1/2017 10/1/2012 2/1/2013 1,500 $ 1,5G0 46,752 46,752 (1) 0 0 1,633 1,633 (1) 58,916,281 58,916,281 (2) 277,651 277,651 249,044 249,044 4,992 4,992 253,322 253,322 1,531,469 1,531,469 628 628 955,883 955,883 292 292 502,690 502,690 287,463 287,463 1,448,920 1,448,920 $ 64,978,520 (1)-This amount Is net of outstanding checks. (2)-At July 31, 2001 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $51,789,973,808. The City's proportionate sham of that value is $59,048,108. All investments are liquid and currently available. The City of Temecula's portfolio is in complia~tce with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months. ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~R~,___ CITY MANAGER ~gt/- CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance September 11, 2001 Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001. 2. Approve an appropriation of $162,000 to the sales tax reimbursement line item in the General Fund. 3. Approve an appropriation of $79,000 in the City Attorney line item in the General Fund. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2001. Please see the attached financial statements for an analytical review of financial activity. The request for an additional appropriation in the sales tax reimbursement line item is due to higher than anticipated retail sales within the CFD 88-12 assessment district (Ynez corridor). Sales tax collected by the City within the boundaries of CFD 88-12 increased by 75% from the prior fiscal year. An agreement between the City and the property owners within the district requires the City to annually reimburse the property owners 25% of the sales tax collected within the district. An additional appropriation is also being requested for the city Attorney department line item. During the fiscal year 2000-01 the City experienced increased legal costs due to increased litigation activity and development project activity. FISCAL IMPACT: The appropriation in the General Fund for sales tax reimbursements is funded by the additional sales tax revenue generated within CFD 88-12. The appropriation for City Attorney costs is offset by budget savings in other department budgets. ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Combining Balance Sheet (internal Service Funds) as of June 30, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Internal Service Funds) for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Combining Balance Sheet (Community Facilities Districts) as of June 30, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance (Community Facilities Districts) for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 CITY OF TEMECULA Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2001 and the Statements of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department City of Temecula Combining Balance Sheet As of Jtme 30, 2001 Assets; Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Advances to other funds Deposits Land held for resale Total assets Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other current liabilities Deferred revenue Total liabilities State General Gas Tax Transportation Der Impact Fund Fund Fund Fund CDBG Fund $ 21,179,520 $ 393,89I $ 8,514,061 4,335,432 $ 110,420 4,728 149,096 232,577 7,987 2,721,917 18,881 530,401 122,157 $ 29,018,728 $ 110,420 398,619 $ 8,671,144 $ 122,157 $ 18,178 $ 110,420 7,074,828 45,000 122,157 444,937 $ 78~50 7,537,943 110~20 123,450 122,157 4,099,645 15,182,369 398,619 8,547,694 2,198,771 21,480,785 398,619 8,547,694 Fund balances: Reserved Designated Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances $ 29,018,728 $ 110,420 398,619 $ 8,671,144 $ 122,157. City of Temecula Combining Balance Sheet As of Jane 30, 2001 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Advances to other funds Deposits Land held for resale Total assets Liabilities and fitnd balances: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other current liabilities Deferred revenue Total liabilities Marg Rd AB 2766 Measure "A" CIP Reim Dist Fund Fund Fund Fund Total 40,817 $ 2,992,659 $ 12,350,270 $ 7,987 $ 45,479,205 16,154 34,345 1,862,035 6,634,367 240,564 2,721,917 295,000 313,881 530,401 $ 56,971 $ 3,027,004 $ 14,507,305 $ 7,987 $ 55,920,335 1,425,000 $ 7,987 $ 1,561,585 2,040,124 9,282,109 523,387 3,465,124 7,987 11,367,081 Fund balances: Reserved Designated Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances $ 56,971 4,099,645 3,027,004 5,023,056 32,235,713 6,019,125 8,217,896 56,971 $ 3,027,004 $ 14,507,305. $ 7,987 $ 55,920,335 56,971 3,027,004. 11,042,18l 44,553,254 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Ftmd Balance - Budget and Actual General Fm~d For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 200l Pamual Panended YTD Budget Activity Percent of Budget Sales tax $ 15,700,000 $ 16,321,929 104% Developmental services: Plamfing 458,500 624,340 136% Building & safety 1,887,700 2,168,888 115% Land development l, 100,000 1,368,432 124% Fire 214,000 226,049 106% Grants 167,868 168,593 100% AB3229 (COPS) 116,900 116,791 100% Motor vehicle in lieu 2,602,900 2,895,607 111% Property tax 1,934,000 1,913,781 99% Property transfer tax 385,000 435,438 113°/6 Franchise fees 1,367,000 1,618,679 118% Transient occupancy tax 1,350,000 1,345,538 100% Reimbursements 394,800 401,323 102% Reimbursements from TCSD 162,000 162,000 100% Reimbursements from RDA 225,000 225,000 100% Reimbursements froin CIP 1,055,690 726,041 69% hlvest~nent interest 1,178,000 1,539,101 131% Business licenses 205,000 215,795 105% Vehicle code £mes 325,000 368,376 113% Miscellaneous 70,000 54,074 77% Parking citations/impom~d fees 90,3¢0 101,201 112°/6 Operating transfers in 1,015,700 1,044,376 103% Total Revenues $ 32,005,358 $ 34,041,352 106% (1) (1) O) (2) (3) (4) (5) City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual General Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Expenditures: Annual Amended YTD Budgct Activity YTD Activity Percent Encumbr. + Encumbr of Budget City Council $ 282,210 $ 255,585 CotnmunJty Suppor~ 477,138 419,263 City Manager 619,731 596,476 Economic Development 805,5180 727,678 City Clerk 598,900 561,090 Ciiy Attorney 387,500 465,624 Finance 1,111,141 1,025,351 Human Resources 335,290 301,990 Plmming 2,653,211 2,045,198 Building & Safety 1,788,990 1,662,247 Land Development 1,137,601 890,951 Public Works 4,172, l 19 2,993,781 CIP Admin 1,507,110 1,272,947 Police 7,440,135 6,795,328 Fire Dept 2,581,576 2,084,520 Animal Control 110,000 96,458 Non-departmental 3,259,000 3,421,921 Total Expenditures (Excluding Transfers) Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 29,267.232 25,616,408 2,738.126 8,424,944 $ $ 255,585 91% 28,914 448,177 94% 6,277 602,753 97% 43,166 770,844 96% 561,090 94% 465,624 120% (6) 19,941 1,045,292 94% 572 302,562 90% 430,019 2,475,217 93% 5,570 1,667,817 93% 1,077 892,028 78% (7) 361,563 3,355,344 80% (8) 12,313 1,285,260 85% (9) 10,380 6,805,708 91% 4,027 2,088,547 81% (9) 96,458 88% 3,421,921 105% (10) 923,819 26,540,227 91% Operating Transfers Out 4,087.200 4,055~000 (1,349,074) 4,369,944 17.110,842 17,110,842 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Begimfing Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June30,2001 $ 15,761.768 $ 21,480.786 ( 1 ) The variance in community development revenue is due mainly to several specific plans being processed during the currcm fiscal year and higher than anticipated levels of land development and building activity. (2) The variance in motor vehicle revenues is due to greater than anticipated revenue based on per capita allocation of the state revenue pool. (3) The variance in franchise fee revenue is due to higher payments from the gas and electric utility companies. (4) The variance is CIP rehnbursement revenue is offset by corresponding budget savings in the CIP administration deparlment budget. (5) The variance in investment interest is due to higher than anticipated cash and investment balances being maintained. (6) The variance in the City Ailomey expenditures is due to higher than anticipted cost for development related projects and various litigation activity. (7) The variance in Land Development and Public Works is due to personnel cost savings. (8) The variance is due primarily to lower than anticipated costs being incurred for the administration of CIP projects. (9) The variance in the Fire Department expenditures is higher than anticipated structural fire tax credit that offsets fire contract costs to the City. ( I 0) The variance in the Non-Departmental expenditures is due to greater than anticipated sales tax revenues being generated in CFD 88-12 which results in an increased reimbursement to the propexXy owners within the district. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Gas Tax Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Section 2105-2107 Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begiuning Fund Balm~ce, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balmice, June 30, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget 1,008,200 $ 1,034,481 $ 1,034,481 103% 7,500 9,895 9,895 132% 1,015,700 1,044,376 1,015,700 1,044,376 $ 1,044,376 103% 1,044,376 103% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual State Transportatiun Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Investment interest Traffic congestion relief Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beghming Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Encumbr. $ 10,000 $ 15,207 383,000 383,412 393,000 398,619 393,000 398,619 $ 393,000 $ 398,619 Total Acti~ $ 15,207 383,412 398,619 Percent of Budget 152% 100% 101% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Development Impact Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Quimby $ 81,900 $ 33,455 Street improvements 1,883,800 1,092,937 Traffic signals 341,800 180,766 Parks 1,059,800 1,366,963 Corporate facilities 313,300 369,304 Fire protection 103,800 94,040 Library 258,200 343,188 Public facilities 18,292 Investment interest 469,721 Total Revenues 4,042,600 3,968,666 Expenditures: Operating transfers out Encumbr. Total Activity $ 33,455 1,092,937 180,766 1,366,963 369,304 94,040 343,188 18,292 469,721 3,968,666 8,157,900 2,270,189 2,270,189 Percent of Budget 41% 58% (1) 53% (1) 129% 118% 91% 133% 98% 28% (2) Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begiuning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 (4,115,300) 1,698,477 6,849,216 6,849,216 $ 2,733,916 .$ 8,547,693 Noms: (1) The variance is due to the timing of fees collected on non-residential development, and due to fee credits given for assessment district improvements. (2) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when Df1e funded projects are started and costs are incurred. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Community Development Block Grant For the Fiscal Year Ended J~me 30, 2001 Revenues: Grant revenue Total Revenues Expenditures: Other outside services Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begi~ming Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity 735,700 $ 175,566 735,700 175,566 45,700 45,700 686,300 129,866 732,000 175,566 3,700 3,700 $ (1) The variance is primarily due to the Sextior Center Expression project which is in design. Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 175,566 175,566 45,700 129,866 175,566 24% (1) ~% 19% (1) 24% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes h~ Fm~d Balance - Budget and Actual AB 2766 Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget AB 2766 $ 41,000 $ 59,824 h~vestment interest 2,127 Total Revenues 41,000 61,951 Expenditures: Operating transfers out 38,400 38,400 Total Expenditm'es 38,400 38,400 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 2,600 23,551 Begi~ming Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 33,420 33,420 Ending Fund Balance, Juae 30, 2001 $ 36,020 $ 56,971 59,824 146% 2,127 61,951 151% 38,400 100% 38300 100% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure "A" For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Measure "A" $ Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Debt service - principal Debt service - interest Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begi~ming Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 $ Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Encumbr. Total Activity 1,298,000 $ 1,577,594 138,364 1,298,000 1,715,958 382,036 382,036 183,344 183,344 2,501,000 17,213 3,066,380 582,593 (1,768,380) 1,133,365 1,893,639 1,893,639 $ 1,577,594 138,364 1,715,958 382,036 183,344 17,213 582,593 125,259 $ 3,027,004 of Budget 122% (1) 132% 100% 100% 1% (2) 19% Notes: (1) The variance in Measure "A" revenue is due to hiF~her than anticipated per capita growth in Temecula, as well as strong retail sales activity county-wide. (2) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of whan Measure "A" funded projects are started m~d costs are incurred. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital Improvement Projects Ftmd For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Revenues: (1) Annual Amended 'FID Budget Activity Operating transfers in $ 16,750,070 $ 7,247,668 Grants 1,384,970 865,084 Reimbursements 3,927,450 20,488 h~vestment interest 105,821 Article 3 (SB 821) 175,000 Total Revenues 22,237,490 8,239,061 Expenditures: (1) Rancho Ca Rd interchange 601 Murrieta creek bridge/Overland ext 602 Pala Rd Interim improvements 603 Overlaud overcrossing 604 Offramp widening at Rancho Ca Rd 605 Pauba Rd Improvements II 606 Imersection monitoring system 607 Winchester Rd widening 608 Median rein~bursement 609 Rainbow Canyon interchange 610 Rancho Ca Rd wide/Ynez Rd 611 Emergency generator 612 Santa Grtrds creek bridge/l-15 615 Santiago/Ynez Iht i~nprovements 616 Ynez Rd h~teritn improvements 617 LED-Light emitting diodes 618 Traffic signals Butterfield/Rancho Ca 627 Pala Rd. bridge 631 Diaz realigmnent 632 Signal interconnect system 640 Pavement management 655 Jefferson pavement improvement 656 I15/79S interchange (ultimate) 662 Pala Road improvements 668 Flashing beacons 2000 670 Flashing signals schools 672 Mall improveraent Overland ext. 68l Diaz road extension at Date street 684 I15/Winchester Road ramp improvemen 697 Traffic signals Pala/Loma Linda 701 Traffic signals Pala/Wolf Valley 702 Date streeffCherry Overpass 704 115/Santiago interchange 705 Margarita improvements Pio Pico/79S 706 Murrieta creek interim./Via Montezuma 707 Traffic signal controller upgrade 709 M~mSeta creek bridge widening R.C. 710 Traffic signal equipment installation 712 Traffic signals Margarita/DePor~ola 713 Traffic signals Margarita/Stonewood 714 (continued) Encmnbr. Total Activity $ 7,247,668 865,084 2OA88 105,821 8,239,061 29,051 29,051 210,000 45,274 1,500,000 2,845 232,748 54302 2,700 182,000 149,654 936,999 68,759 25,000 9,090 25,000 14,388 46,000 220,000 32,134 141,820 572,522 6,276 25,000 2,355 57,500 445,870 422,733 115,276 2,058 2,868,277 1,105,205 56,640 23,419 21,436 2,031,844 855,654 725,000 254,796 325,408 9,112 526,914 232,598 50,914 4,554 74,328 32,044 43,679 2,435 91,300 355,630 16,268 441,616 23,068 251,179 45O 33,700 3,764 1,670,000 17,214 168,686 160,629 69,116 37,300 31,994 250,000 15,442 15,157 11,999 3,398 8,601 1,713,432 639,010 913,329 600,737 538,672 35,180 39,000 25,570 500,000 181,591 207,224 210,000 10,014 118,519 7,433 2,238 165,306 5,574 145,600 29,051 96,188 7,399 128,730 181,698 112,438 9,090 14,388 34,569 6,276 2,355 93,358 1,460,835 23,419 871,922 696312 32,180 483,777 3,764 185,900 69,116 30,599 11,999 1,552,339 573,852 25,570 388,815 9,671 151,174 of Budget 43% 62% 1% 37% 100% 46% 0% 55% 100% 12% 36% 58% 16% 1% 81% 51% 41% 43% 96% 10% 92% 11% 11% 43% 12% 100% 91% 96% 66% 78% 8% 91% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital hnprovement Projects Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended Jane 30, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget Woodside landscaping 717 Fiber optic conduits 718 Date/Cherry Street SB. offramp 719 1-15 o~amp widening @ Winchester 720 Margarita/Winchester intersection hnp. 721 Pujol st. sidewalk improvements 826 Old Town south parking lot 828 Starli~t Ridge sidewalk 141 Murrieta Creek multi-purpose trail 142 ADA sports park 145 Multi-trail s system 147 Maintenance facility modification 158 Maintenance facility parking lot 161 Seuior center expansion 163 Children's museum 165 Civic center 166 Community theater 167 Calle Aragon park drainage 169 Chaparral HS swimming pool 170 Desiltation pond 171 Margarita community park fencing 172 Sports complex 173 Sports park field lighting 174 Sports park parking lot rehabilitation 175 Trails master plan 176 Chaparral HS Stadium track 177 Sports park culvert design 178 Musemn 190-808 City hall improvements 199-808 Library 129 Total Expenditures (Excluding Transfers) Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 Notes: 78,292 78,292 78,292 100% 120,000 118,800 118,800 99% 250,000 45,565 45,565 18% 670,000 2,213 960 3,173 200,000 17,138 472 17,610 9% 13,091 435,432 372,077 41,617 413,694 95% 175,000 20,108 116 20,224 12% 200,000 111,453 102,301 102,301 92% 94,608 14 14 0% 741,999 137,390 584,466 721,856 97% 135,000 616,224 52,156 11,538 63,694 10% 1,662,992 974,494 562,920 1,537,414 92% 75,000 2,108,850 104,639 12,930 117,569 6% 90,422 90,755 90,755 100% 2,484,433 255,757 56,775 312,532 13% 155,247 149,422 5,040 154,462 99% 5,778 6,106 6,106 106°/'o (2) 4,904,716 55,837 46,278 102,115 2% 582,394 557,331 33,910 591,241 102% 216,365 203,729 18,021 221,750 102% 80,221 59,488 59,488 74% 44,700 85,000 72,334 11,339 83,673 98% 7,516 3,554 3,554 47% 791 791 791 100% 696,376 383,581 181,631 565,212 81% 33,907,971 8,423,460 4,728,0~6 12,718,769 38% (11,670,481) (184,399) 11,226,580 11,226,580 $ (443,901) $ 11,042,181 (1) The variances in CIP Fund revenues and in project expenditures are due to the timing are actually started and costs are incurred. of when the various projects City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Margarita Road Reimbursement District For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Total Revenues Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning F~md Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30,200I Annual ganended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 15,572 15,572 $ (15,572) (15,572) $ (15,572) $ Internal Service Funds Combfuh~g Balance Sheet As of June 30, 2001 Cash and ~nvestments Receivables Prepaid assets Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation) Total assets Liabilities m~d fund equity: Liabilities: Current liabilities Capital leases payable Total liabilities Fund equity: Conthbuted capital Retained earnings Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity Information Support Insurance Vehicles Systems Services Facilities Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total $ 1A17,751 $ 51,508 $ 457,862 $ 221,409 $ 38,507 $ 2,187,037 14,920 444 5,243 2,041 740 23,388 103,145 3,024 106,169 484,668 606,936 207,902 1,299,506 $ 1,535,816 $ 539,644 $ 1,070,041 $ 431,352 $ 39,247 $ 3,616,100 $ 623,633 $ $ 66,181 $ 27,470 $ 33,617 $ 750,901 224,868 224,868 623,633 0 66,181 252,338 33,616 975,769 500,000 214,539 473,065 94,177 1,281,781 412,183 325,105 530,795 84,837 5,631 1,358,551 912,183 539,644 1,003,860 179,014 5,631 2,640,332 $ 1,535,816 $ 539,644 $ 1,070,041 $ 431,352$ 39,247 $ 3,616,101 Please note that these balances are unaudited. t4 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Internal Service Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2001 Ftmd Vehicles Fund Information Systems Fund Suppor~ Services Fund Facilities Fund Total Revenues: Charges for services $ 402,286 $ 141,973 $ 989,630 $ 255,998 $ 298,624 $ 2,088,511 h~vestment interest 73,991 4,203 22,424 10,008 3,790 114,416 Miscellaneous (515) 5,700 441 11,841 31 17,498 Operating transfer in 55,000 55,000 Total Revenues 475,762 206,876 1,012,495 277,847 302,445 2,275,425 Expenses: Salaries & wages 31,125 285,967 79,102 197,766 593,960 Operating expenses 449,422 5,I85 386,661 97,290 173,526 1,112,084 Interest 20,224 20,224 Depreciation 121,009 320,706 70,096 511,811 Total Expenses 480,547 126,194 993,334 266,712 371,292 2,238,079 Net Income (Loss) (4,785) 80,682 19,161 11,135 (68,847) 37,346 Retained Earnings, July 1, 2000 416,968 244,423 511,634 73,702 74,478 1,321,205 RetainedEanfings, June30,2001 $ 412,183 $ 325,105 $ 530,795 $ 84,837 $ 5,631 $ 1,358,55l Cmnmunity Facilities Districts Combining Balance Sheet As of June 30, 2001 CFD 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 98-01 CFD 98-01 Admin Debt Debt Admin Expense Service Service Expense Fund Fund Fund Fund Total Assets: Cash and investments $ 38,771 $ 3,496,189 $ 1,801,437 9,878 $ 5,346,275 Receivables 559 87,869 35,331 $ 144 123,903 Totalassets $ 39,330 $ 3,584,058 $ 1,836,768 $ 10,022 $ 5,470,178 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Current liabilities $ 3,129 $ 3,584,058 $ 1,836,768 $ 10,022 $ 5,433,977 Total liabilities 3,129 3,584,058 1,836,768 10,022 5,433,977 Fund balances: Reserved Designated 36,201 36,201 Total fund balances 36,201 36,201 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 39,330 $ 3,584,058 $ 1,836,768 $ 10,022 q $ 5,470,178 Please note that these balances are m~audited. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Community Facilities Disthcts For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Investment interest Reimbursements Special assessments Total Revenues Expenditures: Legal services Other outside services Debt service - principal Debt service - interest Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 CFD 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 98-1 CFD 98-1 Admin Debt Debt Admin Expense Service Service Expense Fund Fund Fund Fund Total $ 2,294 $ 213,499 $ 99,975 $ 327 $ 316,095 5,985 1,320 7,305 45,000 1,515,793 1,091,476 18,400 2,670,669 53,279 1,730,612 1,191,451 18,727 2,994,069 6,733 6,733 47,675 I7,504 65,179 610,000 165,000 775,000 904,663 758,723 1,663,386 54,408 1,514,663 923,723 17,504 2,510,298 (1,129) $ 215,949 $ 267,728 $ 1,223 $ 483,771 37,330 36,201 17 ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANd'~ CITY MANAGER /~) CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Howard Windsor, Fire Chief September 11, 2001 Mobile Mapping / First Response RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the three phase Mobile Mapping / First Response software license, and Maintenance support purchase from Plant Equipment for a total amount of $72,414. 2. Approve the appropriation of funds in the amount of $109,864 for the purchase of software from Plant Equipment and hardware to be purchased with a separate RFP. DISCUSSION: After numerous attempts to develop software that would satisfy the City's needs, the professional services of the Max Responder software company have been discontinued. Since City staff originally began working with vendors on the development of a mobile mapping and emergency response capability for the Fire Department emergency response units, Plant Equipment, a local contractor, has fielded a state-of-the-art software that currently exceeds all other software known to the City. The primary goal was to find a program that would improve and standardize our procedures for mapping and cataloging streets and pre-fire plans and for assisting field units in finding call addresses using the latest available technology. Secondly, to provide a system that can be easily updated as new construction and infrastructure is added in the City On June 13, 2001, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was sent to six (6) companies and two responses were received. Only one company (Plant Equipment) clearly illustrated that the City's request could be significantly satisfied with the purchase of an off-the-shelf-software system. Additionally, further developments of this system would satisfy the entire software specification. This technology is considered on the cutting edge and to find a nationally acclaimed contractor local to the community is an invaluable benefit. The only other companyto respond to the RFP did not ha~e a product to demonstrate and was interested in developing software from ground zero for application by our Fire Department. The recommendation by staff is to enter into a three-phased agreement with Plant Equipment for the purchase software licenses, support training and technical maintenance service support for three (3) years. It is necessary to schedule the total purchase of this agreement in three (3) phases so that pricing can be fixed for the new mobile map version (5.0) which is expected to be released in November 2001. Essentially, the first phase of the agreement would be executed immediately for $38,118 and would include the purchase of two (2) license agreements, version 4.2, one (1) mobile mapping module and map manager package. The second phase would be purchased in November 2001, following the fielding of mobile map version 5.0 for $19,760. This phase would include the purchase of seven (7) units of software licenses and associated training. The final phase of this agreement would include the purchase of five (5) software licenses, version 5.0, for $14,536 and would take place after the first of the year. The total agreement would be for $72,414 (taxes included). Exhibit E lists the pricing schedules for the three phases of this agreement. Another benefit to purchasing the Plant Equipment software is the development of a business relationship with this local company. Plant Equipment has proposed to the City a beta test agreement relationship that would directly impact the City's ability to influence the future development and testing of software improvements and updates. This would keep the City on the cutting edge of technological advancements and in a position to take advantage of preferred pricing. FISCAL IMPACT: In the current year Fire Department budget funds totaling $42,000 is available to purchase a portion the software licenses. An appropriation of $109,864 is needed to satisfy the purchase of all additional software and hardware associated with this system. Attachment: City of Temecula and Plant Equipment Agreement ~th Exhibits A thru E R:IPAPAGGIAGENDASIPL~L~T EQUIPMENT RESPONSE SOFTWARE. DOC 9/4/01 CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR SOFTWARE PURCHASE AND MAINTENANCE ORION Mapping / MapMobile This Purchase and Maintenance Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of September 11, 2001, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Plant Equipment, Inc ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purchase of Software License. On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and all attachments to this agreement, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City ORION Mapping / MapMobile Software as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Statement of Work, and Exhibit B, City Request for Proposal (RFP) Specifications attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Software"). 2. Software Maintenance. On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and all attachments to this agreement, Vendor agrees to provide to the City Software Maintenance for a period of three (3) years as more particularly described in Exhibit C and will begin after the expiration of the warranty, Software Maintenance Prcgrem, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Software Maintenance"). Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its maintenance obligations under this Agreement. 3. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Software is Seventy Two Thousand Four Hundred Fourteen Dollars and No Cents ($72,414.00). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: Phase I: $38,118.00; Phase I1: $19,760.00; and Phase II1: $14,536.00. The Software Maintenance Costs are included in the purchase price of the software for the full three (3) years. 4. Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title, License and OperatinR Condition. Vendor is the owner of the Software and has good and marketable title and license to all of the Software. All of the Software and associated modules are free and clear of any rastdctions on or conditions to transfer, license or assignment, and City will be granted license rights to utilize the purchased software free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions, restrictions, copyrights or disputes. Vendor shal! grant to the City a non- exclusive license to use the Software for the purpose in accordance with the terms and on the conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Software License Agreement described in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Software License"). All of the software is in good operating condition as per the attached Statement of Work and specifications attached hereto and incorporated herein, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Exhibit B. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the Software for use by Temecula Fire Department for emergency response mobile data and that the City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Software is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which this Software is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement and all attachments, contain or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made. 5. Term. This Agreement shall commence on September 11, 2001 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the previsions of this Agreement. The license will run indefinite or until terminated. The Software Maintenance Agreement will continue in effect for no longer than three (3) years, with an option to renew the Maintenance Agreement if so desired by both parties. 6. Delivery. Delivery of the Software shall be provided in a three-phase installation process as outlined in the Exhibit A and B. 7. Acceptance. Acceptance testing shall be jointly performed by the Vendor and City for the software described in Exhibit A and B. Acceptance testing shall begin when the installation for each phase is complete for that portion of the software is operable. All other requirements of Ac, ceptanca Testing shall be as outlined in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A. If, in the determination of the City, the Software fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, the City shall so notify Vendor within thirty (30) days of installation of the Software. Failing such notice, the Software shall be deemed accepted by the City as of the date of installation. 8. Rejection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City pursuant to Section 7, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Software, (2) accept the whole of the Software, or (3) accept any module of the Software and reject the remainder. The exercise of any of the above options shall be '~,ithout prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, the City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Software tendered and any and all performance required of the vender pursuant to this agreement will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Software or any part thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or from the City's use and/or vendors installation of the software/equipment or vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 11. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injudes to persons or damages to property which may adse from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covedng Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be pdmary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' pdor wdtten notice by certified mail, retum receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:Vll, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of CoveraRe. Consultant shall furnish the City with odginal endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the aaa 14~0191 0 - 4 - 12. Contract Documents. a. This Agreement consists of this agreement and the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: (1) Plant Equipment Inc Statement of Work, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) City of Temecula Specifications as attached to the Request for Proposal (RFP) dated June 13, 2001 attached hereto as Exhibit B; (3) Plant Equipment Software Maintenance Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit C; (4) Plant Equipment Software License Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit D; (5) Plant Equipment, Inc. Price Sheet & City of Temecula Cost Implementation By Phase, attached hereto as Exhibit E. b. In the event any term or condition of any and all attachments to this agreement conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the RFP, and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendor's Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over the Vendor's Response to the RFP. 13. Remedies. The remedies and dghts conferred on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative with all other remedies and dghts accorded the City under law or equity.' 14. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. 15. Le.qal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and/or its officers or employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 16. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Vendor without the express wdtten consent of City. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. 17. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of final jurisdiction, it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid, enforceable, and binding on the parties. 18. Prohibited Interest. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds there or during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/vendor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non- contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 19. Entire Agreement; Modification; Waiver. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all pdor and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver of any of the previsions of this agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 20. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the third business day after mailing if mailed to the party to whom notice is to be given, by first class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, or on the first business day after being deposited with an overnight carrier for delivery the next business day, and properly addressed as follows: To Vendor: Plant Equipment, Inc. P. O. Box 9007 Temecula, CA 92589-9007 Attn: Jeff Freeland To City: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, Califomia 92589 Attn: City Manager Any party may change its address for purposes of this paragraph by giving the other parties written notice of the new address in the manner set forth above. 21. Effects of Headings. The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its previsions. 22. Governin,q Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Califomia as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California. 23. Warranty Against Propriety Infringement Vendor warrants that it is lawfully entitled to provide City with the Software and all other materials referred to in this agreement hereof. Vendor shall indemnify, defend and hold free and harmless City from and against any and all claims, liabilities and/or judgments based upon or arising out of any allegation that any aspect of the software licensed to City by Vendor infringes a United States patent, trademark, copyright or other intellectual property or proprietary fight, or constitutes a misappropriation of a trade secret provided (i) that City promptly notifies Vendor in writing that such claim or suit has been received by the City; (ii) that Vendor has the right to assume the defense of such claim or suit with counsel selected by Vendor and at Vendor's sole cost, (iii) that Vendor receives City's cooperation in the defense of such claim or suit, (iv) that Vendor shall have the right to settle such claim or suit at its expense, and/or procure the right for City to continue to use the software purchased, and/or to modify the software in such a fashion as to eliminate any infringement or misappropriation, subject to City's satisfaction, and (v) that Vendor and City shall have the right, in the event that such cure is not reasonably available, to terminate this Agreement, subject to Vendor's refunding seventy-five percent (75%) of any prepaid license fee if terminated less than two (2) years of the date of acceptance by City, fifty percent (50%) if terminated between two (2) and five (5) years after the date of acceptance, and twenty-five percent (25%) if terminated any time thereafter. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on the day and year first above wdtten. CITY' OF TEMECULA Jeff Commerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Plant Equipment, Inc. Attn: Jeff Freeland P.O. Box 9007 Temecula, CA 92589-9007 Phone (909) 719-2100 Fax (909) 296-2727 By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: Two Signatures Required For Corporations EXHIBIT A Plant Equipment, Inc. Statement of Work 960829 t1086-~000! sas 1480191 0 - 9 - CTEMJF083001.doc City of Temecula, CA ORION MapManager / MapMobile Statement of Work (SOW) 42505 Rio Nedo Temecula, CA. 92590 Tel. 909-676-4802 Fax 909-676-0998 www. peinc.com July 20, 2001 CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY INFORMATION This document and the product it describes are the property of Plant Equipment, Inc. This document may not be transferred from the custody or control of Plant Equipment, Inc. except as authorized by Plant Equipment, inc. This Document is for informational purposes only. PLANT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. Copydght 1998 Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights reserved. CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 Table of Contents il.0 GOALS .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 3 3.0 PROJECT DETAILS ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 PEI RESPONSIBILITIES ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 TEMECULA RESPONSIBILITIES ............... . .................. 9 3.3 TEMECULA RESPONSIBILITIES CONT ......................................................................................... 10 4.0 PRICING AND PAYMENT ..........................................................................................................13 4.1 DETddLED PROJECT TASKS AND PRICING FOR MAPPING SERVICES AND INTERFACES ................... 13 PLEASE REFER TO PEI QUOTE NUMBER 3290 FOR MORE COMPLETE PRICING. ORDEKI]qG INFORMATION.. 13 ORDERING INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................... 14 5.0 POST INSTALLATION SUPPORT ............................................................................................. 14 5.1 POST INSTALLATION SUPPORT - TIME AND MATEPdALS ............................................................... 14 5.2 POST INSTALLATION SUPPORT LIMITATIONS ................................................................................. 14 6.0 INTEGRATION TESTING ...........................................................................................................15 7.0 ACCEPTANCE .............................................................................................................................. 15 7.1 ACCEPTANCE TESTING .................................................................................................................. 15 7.2 BENEFICIAL LISE ............................................................................................................................ 19 8.0 TERMS & CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................. 19 8.1 RISK OF LOSS ................................................................................................................................ 19 8.2 W~d~NTY ................................................................................................................................... 19 8.3 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY ............................................................................................................. 20 8.4 SOFTWARE LICENSE ...................................................................................................................... 20 9.0 APPROVAL .................................................................................................................................... 21 This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All dghts reserved. - © 1999 ,Page 2 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 Customer Statement of Work Site Riverside County Fire Dept, CA MapManagedMapMobile Temecula, CA Project # CTEMJF08$001 The purpose of this document is to clarify the responsibilities of Plant Equipment, Incorporated, hereinafter designated as "PEI", City of Temecula., CA, hereinafter designated as "TEMECULA", regarding the goals, scope of work, deliverables, and terms and conditions of the custom project described herein for City of Temecula, CA 1.0 Goals This statement of work between PEI and TEMECULA will define the project, performance requirements, delivery schedule, acceptance criteria, and payment milestones from execution to this project include the following: MapMobile, and services for TEMECULA. Deliverables for TEMECULA include: all items in this Statement of Work. 2.0 Project Description Within this project, they may select a mobile data product and some custom modules and interfaces for its mapping needs may need to be developed. The following is a breakdown of the software and services TEMECULA has requested from PEI: · 15 MapMobile Software Licenses · MapMobile Support and Updates · Two Day On-Site MapMobile final configuration · Two Day On-Site Train the Installer and System Administrator- MapMobile · One Day on-site Train the Trainer Session - MapMobile · 3 years of MapMobile Support and Updates This docuroent contains propdeta~ information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equiproent, Inc. - All rights reserved. - © 1999 .Page 3 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 PEI has committed to designing, programming, and implementing the following interfaces and modules: Orion MapMobile 5.0 MapMobile: MapMobile is a mobile mapping display made for emergency response vehicles. As part of the ORION family of mapping applications, MapMobile integrates with MapStar, MapManager and other mission critical applications in the call-center. The application runs onboard a laptop within the vehicle and can utilize standard radio frequencies to receive data. it integrates to some of the leading mobile data providers, including Motorola, Cerulean, Tiburon and Geac. Because it is a Windows based system, it's easy to learn and use and it can also run other Windows applications on the same laptop. Hardware requirements are minimal making it a cost effective in-vehicle solution. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc.- All rights reserved. - © 1999 .Page 4 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 Key Features · Seamless inIvehicle mapping · Small application footprint, does not draw excessive PC resources · Open API allows integration to GPS/CAD/AVL · Immediate zoom and tracking of GPS-equipped vehicle · Excellent address query and geocoding tools , Gives routing and driving directions · ESR! based application, reads ARC/View shapes and ARC/Info coverages · Icon representation of resident vehicle location, speed, bearing, and direction · Utilized zoom layering · Preplan capabilities · Distancing tools · User layering control · Feature information tools, data referencing MapManager: MapManager, is a fully integrated, map-based, master street address guide (MSAG), computer aided dispatch (CAD), and digital map maintenance system from PE[. Its common maintenance approach insures that every call for service (CFS) address found in the HSAG, will also be found in the CAD or 9-1-1 system database and on the digital map. Best of all, it is easy to learn and easy to use. MapManager is a Windows based Geographic Information System (GIS) that was wdtten specifically for digital map, MSAG, and CAD maintenance. It is an Avenue (ESRI) application that can import/export to other major GIS vendors. MapManager is an easy to use system that contains all the functionality needed for map, MSAG, and CAD maintenance. Instead of learning multiple programs with thousands of commands, users need only to learn one simple system. Training for MapManager street and structure addressing tools is typically conducted in less than a day. Features include: · Grid and distance-based street centerline addressing tools · Automated structure addressing based on the relative location to the street centerline and driveway locations · ESN, Community, and Exchange boundary assignment to street centerlines · Map-based MSAG generation with error reports · Map-based MSAG to the tabular MSAG comparison process with reports This document contains propdetaq¢ information and should be protected from disclosure to third par[les. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. ~ All fights reserved. - © 1999 .Page 5 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 · It is an Avenue application and uses .shp fifes directly MapManager is designed to work in conjunction and support PEI's MapStar and MapMobile products. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights reserved. - © 1999 .Page 6 CTEMJF083001.doc Project # CTEMECULA030601 09/04/01 Kev Features · Tightly integrated to MapStar · Provides tools to generate and maintain a digital map and geographic display database of street centerlines, structures and other public safety layers · Features tools to address streets with a distance based and/or intersection- to-intersection approach, which can be used to initially name and address streets and structures from scratch · Tools to maintain MSAG boundaries · Generates MSAG from a street centerline map and associated boundaries · Tools for assignment and maintenance of HSAG boundary information to street centerlines · Tools to maintain the tabular MSAG through a comparison process with the map-based MSAG -- As records are compared and matched, all records that do not match are revealed with their reason for not matching · ORZON rvlapManager is an ArcView® based application using shape files, or ArcInfo® coverage files directly 3.0 Project Details 3.1 PEI Responsibilities Designate a person to act as the Project Manager who will be TEMECULA's point of contact throughout the project. This Project Manager must have the authority to act on behalf of PEI in all aspects of fulfillment of this Project. Name & Phone#: To be determined and accepted by Temecula. Temecula will prefer a local Project Manager. Schedule all on-site activities with TEMECULA's project manager to ensure that the site as well as TEMECULA has the necessary components completed to allow your trip to be successful. · Install, test, and acquire functional field acceptance of PEI software at TEMECULA. The software includes the following: This document contains propdetaP/information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. -All dghts reserved. - © 1999 .Page 7 CTEMJF083001.doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 · ORION MapMobile 5.0 · Resolve technical issues with TEMECULA through TEMECULA's designated program and/or project managers. Provide 2 days of completed on-site installation and set-up for PEI's components. This implementation shall be coordinated through TEMECULA's Project Manager. Provide on-site (at TEMECULA headquarters) end-to-end system testing to gain operational acceptance. This testing shall be coordinated through TEMECULA's Project Manager. Provide one day of on-site MapMobile training for TEMECULA using the "Train the Trainer" approach. This training shall be coordinated through TEMECULA's Project Manager. Complete and provide one copy of detailed documentation in hard and soft copy on the product and interface functionality, interface configuration, and installation instructions. After three years (depending upon length of support agreement), present TEMECULA with the option to renew their on-going maintenance and support. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected fi.om disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc.- All dghts reserved. - © 1999 .Page 8 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 3.2 TEMECULA Responsibilities Designate a person to act as the Project Manager/Designee or alternate who will be TEMECULA's point of contact throughout the project. This Project Manager must have the authority to act on behalf of TEMECULA in all aspects of fulfillment of this Project. Ensure that TEMECULA has all the necessary hardware and software in place for PEI use. Coordinate these items with PEI. Ensure that TEMECULA will allow site access during their normal business hours for any on-site work that PEI will need to perform. Coordinate the on-site implementation with TEMECULA to ensure that the hardware and personnel are available for the agreed upon days. Coordinate the on-site training with TEMECULA to ensure that training facilities and personnel are available for the agreed upon days. The "Train the Trainer" approach will be utilized. Oversee the project to maintain the delivery schedule timelines. And communicate the expectations of implementation dates and deadlines. Provide on request, information, data, records, and documents, and make such decisions as may be reasonably required by PEI to perform under this Agreement. TEMECULA shall perform this task in a prompt and timely manner. TEMECULA shall be solely responsible for the accuracy and completeness of data content and structure supplied to PEI. Use reasonable efforts to provide supporting information to aid in the solution of any problems discovered during implementation. Provide appropriate schedule notification and facility availability for PEI on- site services, if required. Ensure that the operating environment is fully functional and meets PEI's minimum operating requirements for PEI hardware and software products. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All dghts reserved. - © 1999 .Page 9 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04101 Project # CTEMECULA030601 3.3 TEMECULA Responsibilities Cont. This contract assumes that TEMECULA has an updated and positional accurate street centerline file available for TEMECULA and will provide these files at no cost for this project. TEMECULA is responsible for error checking their street centerline files and making certain that their street centerline files and their attributes are accurate and current. TEMECULA is also responsible for creating any other layers that they want displayed. TEMECULA will also be responsible for creating the appropriate label layers for the map. PEI will verify the Temecula map data set. This verification process will examine a number of data attributes and structure. Please refer to the attached Verification and Processing Worksheet. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All dghts reserved. - © 1999 .Page 10 CTEMJF083001.doc Project # CTEMECULA030601 PEI is making the assumption that the following layers will be available from TEMECULA in an ESRI file format: Layer Type Description Street Polyline This layer at a minimum will contain all of the street centedines in the Centerline geographic area covered by the CAD system. Key attributes which must be populated include prefix, street name, street type, street suffix, right Iow address, right high address, left Iow address, left high address, classification code, and any other attributes usually required by a CAD. Major Road Polyline A layer, which only contains major roads. This layer will be extracted from the street centedine layer by TEMECULA and will be used primarily to enhance the speed of the geographic display at higher levels. The attributes for this layer will match the street centerline layer. Intermediate Polyline A layer that only contains intermediate roads. This layer will be extracted Roads from the street centerline layer by TEMECULA and will be used primarily to enhance the speed of the geographic display at intermediate levels. The attributes' for this layer will match the street centerline layer. City Polygon A layer that defines all of the city and county jurisdictional boundaries within the geographic area that will be covered by the CAD. Polygons must match street centedines node for node where the boundary follows the street centerline. The boundary must split the street centerline at an end node of a polyline. Hydrography Polyline A minor rivers and streams layer should be included. This layer will be primarily used for dispatcher/call taker map orientation and will only contain polylines. Hydrography Polygon A lakes and major river layer should be included. This layer will only contain polygon information. Common Place Point This layer will consist of the commonplace name and landmarks layers. The purpose of this layer is to allow the call taker/dispatcher to immediate orientate themselves on the map. This layer will aIIow the dispatcher to visualize any significant landmarks or common places located in close proximity to the incident that may alter the planned response. Common Place Polygon This layer will consist of those commonplace names that should be displayed as a polygon. An example 0f this might include park boundaries, office parks, nei~]hborhood areas, etc. Annotation Text TEMECULA will use MapMobile to create Labels for each layer at each zoom level. The following MapMobile costs have not been included in PEI's contract or costs. These costs should be included in TEMECULA's costs or TEMECULA's internal budget: · All PC hardware costs for MapMobile, hardware installation, network installation, and wiring costs. · The cost for additional network hubs if required. · All hardware support. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All dghts reserved. - © 1999 .Page 1 1 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09104/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 · PEI also assumes that space is available in the console for all of the hardware specified below and this is the responsibility of TEMECULA. · TEMECULA wilt have an integration cost associated with the MapMobile interface. This cost has not been included in this proposal. · TEMECULA is responsible for implementing the traffic studies associated with this task. · It is TEMECULA's responsibility to make certain that all of the units they want to track have the necessary software to provide the unit locations to the switch. · To reiterate, PEI is only providing software applications and not hardware and will only be responsible for interfacing to the TEMECULA switch and mobile application. Minimum Computer Hardware Configuration for MapMobile Pentium 266 MHz Pentium III Processor 4.0 GB hard drive 128 MB RAM (256 MB Recommended) Windows 95,98,NT, 2000 Trimble TAIP Compliant GPS Receiver Placer 400 or later Two serial ports must be available, one to connect to MapMobile, one to connect to TEMECULA for the other GPS feed. Another serial port will be required for the connection to the modem by TEMECULA. 3.5" Diskette Drive CD-ROM Hardware and Interfaces PEI will complete the implementation and acceptance of all software and services within 160 days from date of signature below or as agreed upon by TEMECULA's Project Manager and TEMECULA to meet the timelines of the project. Any request for delivery schedule change must be provided in writing to TEMECULA. This request must contain the reason for delay and identification of a new delivery date. This document contains pmprieta~ information and should be pmtscted from disclosure to third parties, Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights reserved. - © 1999 .Page 12 CTEMJF083001.doc Project # CTEMECULA030601 4.0 Pricing and Payment 4.1 Detailed Project Tasks and Pricing for Mapping Services and Interfaces 1 ~809800-01316 1 vlAPMBL-00101 11 ~09800-51005 ~OR MAP VERIFYNALID CUST Ii;Id Engineering Services AY ONSITE IMPLEMENTATION roject Management Services ROJECT MGT-INTEGRATION $4,600.00I $3,700.00 $154.00 $4,60 $3,70 $1,69 Please refer to PEI quote number 3290 for more complete pricing. 'mis document con~3ins proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties, Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All dghts reserved. - © 1999 .Page '~ 3 CTEMJF083001 .doc Project # CTEMECULA030601 Ordering Information In addition to this agreement, a purchase order for the amount indicated in section 5.1 should be issued to PEI prior to the onset of any labor or delivery of materials. IMPORTANT: Purchase orders should reference the project number CTEMJF083001 listed on this SOW. All purchase orders should be sent via mail, fax, EDI, or e-mail to the following address: Plant Equipment, Inc. Attn: Inside Sales Department P.O. Box 9007 Temecula, CA 92589-9007 Phone: 800.491.1734 Fax: 909.676.9651 e-mail: InsideSales~,peinc.com 5.0 Post Installation Support 5.1 Post Installation Support-Time and Materials Post installation support beyond the standard support already purchased may be obtained from PEI on a Time & Materials basis at a labor rate of $150.00/hour plus expenses, or at the current PEI labor rate, whichever is greater. 5.2 Post Installation Support Limitations PEI's support obligations hereunder will not apply to any PEI supported product if adjustment, repair, or parts replacement is required because of: · Accident, neglect, tampering, misuse, improper/insufficient grounding, failure of electric power, failure of TEMECULA and/or others to. provide appropriate environmental conditions, relocation of hardware or software, or causes other than ordinary use · Repair or alteration, or attempted repair or alteration of any PEI supported product (hardware and/or software) by TEMECULA or others · Connection of another machine, device, application or interface to PEI supported equipment (hardware and/or software) by TEMECULA or others, which has caused damage to PEI supported equipment · Damage or destruction caused by natural or man-made acts or disasters This document contains proprietaP/infonmation and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights reserved. - © 1999 ,Page 14 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 Degradation of performance to PEI systems due to the installation of third party software applications not specifically certified, approved, and registered by PEI for integrated use at the site(s) identified herein. Support described herein does not include cosmetic repairs, refurbishment, furnishing consumables, supplies or accessories, making accessory changes or adding additional devices or software applications. 6.0 Integration Testing Should any TEMECULA supplied/specified hardware and/or software component fail any compatibility, cohabitation and/or coexistence test specified herein, TEMECULA shall be responsible for all charges accrued prior to the test failure as well as the actual testing costs. 7.0 Acceptance 7.1 Acceptance Testing PEI and TEMECULA shall jointly perform acceptance testing for the mapping project described herein. Acceptance testing shall begin when PEI believes that the mapping installation is complete and the system is operable. PEI and TEMECULA personnel shall jointly perform acceptance testing for the Mapping System. The acceptance test shall begin when PEI believes that the Mapping System is complete and operable. Acceptance testing will be performed on two (2) workstations. Acceptance testing shall include GPS interface, and map retrieval from the map database and map display. During the acceptance test period, it is required that the Mapping System operate without major failure. TEMECULA shall assist in identifying deficiencies as provided for in this Agreement. In measuring acceptance, Mapping System failure resulting from external causes, including but not limited to GPS failure, incorrect map data, missing map data, power failure, improper grounding, acts of God, fire, or TEMECULA negligence, shall be excluded from the acceptance testing. This document contains propdeta~ information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All dghts re,sewed. - © 1999 ,Page 15 CTEMJF083001 ,doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 PEI shall be responsible for documenting the cause for and facilitating the resolution of any problem or failure with any PEI supplied component of the Mapping System during the Acceptance Test. If the Mapping system does not function because of a problem with any product or facility provided by TEMECULA, it is TEMECULA's responsibility to define/document the problem and facilitate the corrective action to fix the problem. If, in TEMECULA's judgment, it believes that the Mapping System has not passed a required test, PEI may request a written description of the way in which the Mapping System's performance was unsatisfactory in order that PEI may better facilitate the resolution of the Mapping defective performance. 1. Interfaces and Modules: · 15 MapMobile Software Licenses Once the field-testing of the entire system test procedure has been satisfactorily completed, TEMECULA will initial in the space provided to indicate acceptance of the system. In the event of a discrepancy, a Discrepancy Report form will be filled out detailing the item for resolution. This form shall be signed and dated by representatives of both TEMECULA and PEI. The PEI signature on each Discrepancy Report shall serve as an acknowledgment of responsibility to resolve that item as agreed to by TEMECULA and PEI permitting TEMECULA to sign-off of that ATP section. Acceptance testing for each of the payments will consist of the following: This document contains propdeta~ information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights rose~ved. - © 1999 .Page 1 6 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04101 Project # CTEMECULA030601 Acceptance Test ~ MapMobile Testing MapMobile supports the capability to find an address or intersection on the map. Test: Demonstrate the ability to find an address or intersection on MapMobile. MapMobile supports the capability to acquire information on map layers. Test: Select a segment on the street centerline layer and demonstrate the ability to display information on the segment. Test: Select a pamel on the parcel layer and demonstrate the ability to display information on the polygon. MapMobile supports pan, zoom in, and zoom out capabilities. Test: Demonstrate the pan, zoom in, and zoom out capabilities. MapMobile supports NMEA GPS data protocol and will accept this data via a serial connection Test: Demonstrate the ability to display the GPS location This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights reserved, - © 1999 .Page 17 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04101 Project # CTEMECULA030601 1 2. Services · Completion of 2-day on-site MapMobile configuration · Completion of 2-day Train the Software Installer and System Administrator MapMobile · Completion of 1-day Train the MapMobile Trainer In measuring acceptance, any MapMobile functionality failure resulting from ServedNetwork failure, power failure, improper grounding, acts of God, fire, or TEMECULA negligence, shall be delayed until resolved. PEI shall be responsible for documenting the cause for and facilitating the resolution of any problem or failure with any PEi supplied component of the TEMECULA system during the acceptance test. If the TEMECULA system does not function because of a problem with any product or facility provided by TEMECULA, it is TEMECULA's responsibility to define/document the problem and facilitates the corrective action to fix the problem. If in TEMECULA's judgment, it is believed that the TEMECULA system has not passed a required test, PEI may request a written description of the way in which the system was unsatisfactory. This information will allow PEI to better facilitate the resolution of the performance deficiency. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - Ali rights reserved. - © 1999 ,Page 1 8 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 7.2 Beneficial Use Should TEMECULA commence use of the system or any sub-system thereof for their intended purposes, other than for the express purposes of training or testing, prior to system or sub-system acceptance, outstanding payment for said system or sub-system shall be due net thirty (30) days. The warranty and/or maintenance periods for such equipment put into use, upon completed acceptance testing of the software, unless warranty and/or maintenance has already begun, shall be deemed to have commenced concurrently with the use of the system or sub-system (components thereo0 for its intended purpose. The use of the system, or any of its sub-systems and/or components for its intended purpose shall be deemed to have occurred when TEMECULA commences the use and/or dependency on the system, or any of its sub-systems or components for their intended purpose. 8.0 Terms & Conditions 8.1 Risk of Loss TEMECULA agrees to bear all risk of loss, injury, or destruction of goods and materials, which occur prior to acceptance of the MapMobile system by TEMECULA, and such loss, injury or destruction will not release PEI from any obligation hereunder, provided that such loss, injury or destruction is not due to negligence of TEMECULA. 8.2 Warranty The warranty period for any custom hardware, software and/or services provided hereunder shall be 90 days commencing on the date of installation upon completed acceptance testing of the software. During that period PEI warrants that any custom hardware, software and/or services, provided hereunder, shall be provided by qualified, PEI certified personnel in a workmanlike manner and will perform substantially as required in the SOW and all attachments herein. PEI disclaims all other warranties, either expressed or implied, with regard to the hardware, software and/or custom product. Warranties provided by third parties, brand name manufacturers, and other service providers relating to this service agreement may be coordinated and applied by PEI upon customer request, however, these warranties are ultimately not the responsibility of PEI. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights reserved. - © 1999 ,Page 19 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 8.3 Limitation of Liability In no event shall PEI be liable for any Special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages whatsoever (including but not limited to damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of information, or any other pecuniary loss) arising out of the use of or inability to use the supported hardware, software and/or custom product covered under this statement of work. 8.4 Software License Please see the attached PEI End User License Agreement. This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties. Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights reserved. - © 1999 .Page 20 CTEMJF083001 .doc 09/04/01 Project # CTEMECULA030601 9.0 Approval This statement of work becomes an agreement upon execution by both parties. Thereafter, any changes to the statement of work must be made by a written change order agreement signed by authorized representatives of both parties with direct reference to the statement of work, and to subsequent applicable change orders. Any such changes may increase the price or lengthen the schedule of the project. TEMECULA Plant Equipment, Inc. (Signature) (Signature) (Name) (Name) (Title) (Title) (Date) (Date) This document contains proprietary information and should be protected from disclosure to third parties, Property of Plant Equipment, Inc. - Ail rights rosenred. - © 1999 .Page 21 EXHIBIT B City of Temecula RFP Dated 6113101 with Software Specifications 960829 1108600001 sas 1480191 0 - 10 - CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Mobile Mapping I First Response PART I: SELECTION CRITERIA A final contract will be awarded to the Vendor who can best meet the requirements as specified; and provide the highest quality and cost effective mobile mapping/first response software to the City, as determined by the City Council based on the following factors (which are listed without implication of priority): Information regarding the Vendor's experience and qualifications to successfully provide the software and maintenance support for mobile mapping and emergency first response data storage and mobile display. The ability and willingness of the Vendor to meet all requirements as outlined in the Specifications/Scope of Work (see Exhibit A). A list of client references and an outline of any experience the Vendor has had in meeting the needs of other governmental organizations, or any organization that currently utilizes the mobile mapping/first response software. Name and references of any subcontractors who will be utilized to supply the services as outlined in the Specifications/Scope of Work (see Exhibit A). The thoroughness and conformity of the proposal package, overall cost of services to be provided, quality of the software, and ability of the software to integrate with current City software and hardware. Ability of Vendor to provide on-going twenty-four hour, seven days a week, technical support. Financial ability of Vendor to provide the services as outlined in the Specifications/Scope of Work (see Exhibit A). Quality of the mobile mapping software product and its ability to meet the standards as provided by this RFP and the company's statement of work. 9. Extent of manufacturer and/or dealer warranties. 10. Willingness of Vendor to extend pdcing on a tiered purchase basis. 11. Delivery and installation meet City required timelines. PART I1: INSTRUCTIONS~ CONDITIONS~ LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Provide pricing on all requirements as outlined in Exhibit "A~. If there are discrepancies between services, labor, parts, materials, maintenance costs, technical support, unit prices and extensions, the City reserves the right to clarify pricing with the affected Vendors. Vendor shaft include within its proposal a price quote for future software upgrades, and provide and outline of the software's integration capabilities. P:/Degange/MobileMap. RFP 1 Failure on Vendor's part to list all cost components related to the service will not be accepted by the City as an acceptable justification to re-quote the proposal. The city will treat the original proposal and costs provided as firm. However, Vendor has the option of withdrawing a proposal at any time until a final contract is executed. Delivery schedules shall be a part of the consideretion. It is expected that an implementation outline will be provided by the Vendor with software installation complete within 30 days, and with a test period of 90-120 days. Implementation timelines must be stated in definite terms, and must be met. If time varies on specific items proposed, the Vendor shall so state the specific schedule as to those items in the proposal sheet (Exhibit A). Once a Vendor has been selected for award, the City reserves the right to renegofiate delivery terms based on changing situations or the convenience of the City. Vendor shall provide an original and four (4) copies of the proposal upon submission. Failure to provide four (4) copies may result in disqualification from consideration for contrect award. The City of Temecula has outlined the requirements herein in as much detail as is currently known. Please provide any exceptions, additional information, or suggestions that will aid in the City's selection process (attachments are acceptable). All services provided by the Vendor shall be performed in strict accordance with the manufacturer's standards, State of California specifications, and County/City Fire Department requirements and standards as applicable. Vendor will provide certification establishing that the Vendor is fully authorized by the manufacturer for the sale, distribution, installation, and support of the equipment required by this RFP. The Vendor shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees free and harmless from any and all causes of action or claims of damages arising out of or related to the Vendor's performance under this contract. The City reserves the right to negotiate terms and specifications/scope of work with the highest ranked Vendor. If an agreement cannot be negotiated, the City reserves the right to negotiate with any other Vendor. 10. Vendor shall identify those services that will be out-sourced to a subcontractor or sub- vendor. The Vendor will be responsible for verifying the qualifications and validity of all licenses or permits for any out-sourced work to sub-vendors. The Vendor is also responsible for paying its employees and any sub-vendors the Vendor hires. 11. All work and deliverables described in Exhibit "A" must carry a 1 year warranty. Vendor agrees that any out-sourced work or jobs will carry the same warranty. The Vendor warrants that all service performed shall be consistent with manufacturer and City specifications. The Vendor shall also warrant that any failure of materials or services within the warranty period that is traceable to materials or labor supplied during the service, shall be replaced or repaired at no additional charge to the City. Additionally, vendor agrees to accept liability for any non-performance of the software as proposed in the Vendor's statement of work. 12. A final contract will be awarded to the most competitively priced and qualified proposal. Although price is of prime consideration, it is not the sole determining factor. The P:/Degange/MobileMap. RFP 2 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 20. 21. City reserves the right to select the appropriate firm based on the most qualified proposal and information gained from the interview and presentation portion of the selection process. The determination of the most qualified and most competitively priced proposal may involve all or some of the following factors: price, thoroughness of the proposal package, previous experience and performance; conformity to specifications in Exhibit A; financial ability to fulfill the contract; ability to meet the integration requirements as outlined in the Scope of Work;, terms of payment; compatibility, as required; number of sub-vendors the main Vendor may need to employ for out-sourced work; other costs; and other objective and accountable factors which are reasonable. The City reserves the right to select a Vendor to perform all of the work identified in the RFP, or only selected portions based on price and/or other factors. At time of execution of the contract, the selected Vendor is obligated to provide evidence of insurance liability to include: Worker's Compensation, General Liability, Automobile Liability, Excess/Umbrella Liability, and Personal Property Damage and abide by the City's Insurance procedures in accordance with Exhibit "B". The successful Vendor shall be an independent contractor, and nothing shall be construed to cause the Vendor to be deemed or represent itself as an agent or employee of the City. The Vendor shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees harmless from any and all causes of action or claims of damages arising out or related to the Vendors performance under this contract. The Vendor shall be excused from performance hereunder during the time and the extent that he/she is prevented from obtaining, delivering, repairing, or performing in the customary manner, by acts of God, fire, war, strike, and loss or shortage of transportation facilities. Vendor shall provide the City satisfactory evidence that non- performance is due to other than fault or negligence on the Vendors part. Any evidence of agreement or collusion among Vendors acting illegally to restrain freedom of competition by agreement to propose a rD(ed price, or otherwise, will render the proposal of such Vendors void. The selected Vendor agrees to maintain a City of Temecula Business License for the duration of the contract. All work shall be done by qualified personnel knowledgeable with the mobile mapping software and the response needs of a public emergency unit such as Fire and Police. Vendor agrees that all service by the Vendor shall be to the satisfaction of authorized City personnel. In the event that the Vendor defaults on performance of any of these requirements, then the City shall have the dght to terminate this agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice delivered to the Vendor by certified mail or couder. Termination of the contract will not relieve the Vendor of any liability to the City for damages sustained by the City because of any breach of contract by the Vendor, and the City may withhold any payments to the Vendor until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the Vendor is determined. The Vendor shall submit a list of at least four (4) references who have pumhased similar products and services from the Vendor. Vendor shall provide company name, contact name and phone number for each reference. The term of the contract shall commence upon award by the City Council or a duly authorized City representative. P:~Degange/MoblleMappJng. RFP 22. The contract between Vendor and the City is non-transferable. Vendor shall under no circumstances assign the agreement without wdtten permission of the City. Vendor shall notify the City, in wdting, of any change in company ownership at least thirty (30) days pdor to said change. 23. The Vendor's proposal shall include the price for the most up to date, high quality, and state of the art mobile mapping/first response software, as outlined, in the Specifications/Scope of Work (Exhibit "A"). Vendor shall also agree to acceptance testing by the City and Vendor for the "real time" operation of the software application, its functionality and the compatibility of all software and hardware integration as represented by the Vendor in this RFP and Statement of Work. 24. Included in the quote should be an itemized list for documentation, manuals, testing, training, maintenance, and post implementation support. 25. The City's standard contract is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". The selected Vendor will be required to enter into this Agreement. By submitting a Proposal, Vendor certifies to the City that he/she has reviewed the Specifications of the RFP and the terms of the Agreement and has incorporated all direct and indirect costs of complying with Specifications, and the Agreement into its Proposal. 26. The City's terms for payment are net 30 upon receipt of invoice. Vendor shall submit invoices between the first and fifteenth business day of each month for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all undisputed fees. Vendor agrees that payment shall not be made until acceptance testing has been approved by both the Vendor and an authorized representative of the City of Temecula Fire Department for each phase of implementation. 27. The City plans to purchase map mobile software in phases. The City reserves the right to also add supplementary units to the Scope of Work as new command sites or vehicles are added to the program. Vendor agrees pricing will be the same as quoted for any units purchased in year one (1) of the contract agreement. Terms may be re-negotiated should the City opt to extend the contract upon its expiration date. 28. The highest ranked responding firms will be required to participate in an interview process with designated City of Temecula staff to review the Vendor's software products and services. At that time the Vendor will be required to give a presentation of their product capabilities utilizing City sample data. 29. Prohibited Interest - No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non- contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. P:~Degange/MobileMapping. RFP PART II1: GENERAL INFORMATION Vendor is required to carefully and fully investigate all of the requirements of this RFP, as well as, the software and hardware integration requirements of the City, the type of hardware to be used by the City, the nature of use for~ the product, the City's expectations of the product, and any other information needed to fulfill the terms of the proposal By submitting a Proposal, Vendor represents and certifies to the City that such investigation has been completed and that it fully understands the Specifications/Scope of Work and the requirements and expectations of the City. The Specification Sheet/Scope of Work (Exhibit A) shall be signed by an authorized official of the company. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals where deemed necessary in the City's sole discretion. The City will not reimburse Vendors for any costs involved in the preparation and submission of proposals. Furthermore, this RFP does not obligate the City to accept or contract for any expressed or implied services. Nothing herein shall be construed as an offer. The City reserves the right to request any Vendor submitting a proposal to clarify its proposal or to supply additional material deemed necessary to assist in the selection process. If an Exhibit "A" requirement cannot be met by a Vendor, then the Vendor should submit a "No ProposaF response for the items affected. All submitted proposals and information included therein or attached thereto shall become public record upon contract award. Vendor is requested to provide any exceptions, additional information or suggestions that will aid in the City's selection process. The attached Exhibit "A' is a suggested list only. If Vendor needs to revise or make additions to the exhibit computer or typed alterations are allowed as long as the City format is maintained. If Vendor will be supplying a Statement of Work, the document should be an attachment to the RFP response and not used as a replacement to the RFP response. 10. The attached Exhibit "C" is a copy of the City's standard Agreement. This is a sample document which requires no action at this time. P:~Degange/MobileMapping,RFP 5 CITY OF TEMECULA MOBILE MAPPING/FIRST RESPONSE SOFTWARE FOR CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS/SCOPE OF WORK EXHIBIT "A" Goal: The goal of the City of Temecula is to purchase mobile mapping data software that will effectively integrate with the City's Geographic Information System (GIS) database and the City of Temecula's current pre-plan program and associated database (FireZone current vereion), be Windows 2000 compatible and download with rapid response to a laptop computer and/or a mobile data computer (MDC) located in several emergency response vehicles, as well as, a centralized command post. Specifications: Software: · User must be able to enter destination address or intersection and computer using assessors parcel and street centerline data. · The software must be able to search street database both alphabetically and phonetically, providing a list of choices both numerically and alphabetically. Routing is computed when location is found with default starting point being current GPS location and software shall have capability to allow default starting point be set for individual computer if GPS interface is unavailable. As the unit and icon on the map reach a pre-determined distance from the scene, the map view zooms to show a closer view of the area. Smaller streets become visible with names, etc. (Note: distance to be determined by user). · Software shall have the capability to zoom into the parcel view with the address and lot lines visible. Software must support and integrate with current version of pre-plan program (Fire Zone 5.0) by providing icons to pre-selected sites and accessing attached files for viewing (Software documentation for Fire Zone 5.0 included). · Software must be compatible and 'integrate with HazMat Reference Guide (Emergency Response Guide - ERG) and access database when selected by user. Software shall have the capability to have an administrative module which should include, but not limited to: multiple street address guide database which is printable based on user specified requirements to maintain back-up maps. Routing Data: Software shall utilize Thomas Brothers and County of Riverside ESRI ArcView Centerline Shape files (Note: the City will ultimately be using the County of Riverside ESRI ArcView Centertine Shape files for this program). · Software must be capable of utilizing and integrating the County of Riverside's assessors parcel shape file as an additional source for routing to an incident. P:~Degange/MoblleMapping. RFP Software must be capable of searching the situs address within the County of Riverside's assessors parcel database that is included as part of the ESRI ArcView parcel shape file. Placement of the incident point should be located on the centroid of the parcel as stored within the parcel database. · A list showing table information related to the ESRI ArcView parcel shape file (e.g.: owner, situs address, acreage, etc.) is required. Display Data: Software must be capable of utilizing any data layers as provided by the City, for display purposes, in ESRI ArcView shape file format. List of data includes, but is not limited to: fire hydrants, high-tire areas, public facilities, parks, schools, points of interest, water bodies, city boundaries, and CDF-RCOFD response areas. Prior to being utilized by the Software, the data layers shall be projected to Latitude- Longitude (feet) in order to be utilized by the system. At a future date when the City has developed digital-ortho imagery for display, the software provider shall work with the City to integrate this information to enable the end user to utilize the new technology with the most current version of the mobile mapping software. GPS: Software must be compatible and integrate with GPS hardware selected by the City (Note: the City agrees to meet minimum hardware configuration of Trimble NMEA Compliant GPS Receiver Placer 400 or later by software provider). · Default starting point can be set for individual computer if GPS interface is unavailable. · Software must be capable of providing GPS coordinates to the seconds on the screen to direct Medevac or Firefighting Aircraft to desired locations. · Icon of responding vehicle to be provided on data map in real time. Print Capabilities: Software must have capability to print any and all information available including, but not limited to: business floor plans (pre-plans), routing maps, and HazMat reference material (ERG). · Software must have capability to pdnt matching maps from street database for back-up, reference files, and periodic updates. Street Name Search Enhancements: · Software shall have capability to incrementally search ESRI ArcView Centerline Shape File database (more letters added by user narrows possible matches). · Software shall have capability to find intersections in ESRI ArcView Centeriine Shape Files database by user specified location. P:~Degange/Mobi~eMapplng. RFP Software must have capability to perform searches of ESRI ArcView Centerline Shape Files database (the current files used are Thomas Brothers and the County of Riverside ESRI AmView Centedine Shape files; please note: the City will ultimately be using the County of Riverside ESRI ArcView Centedine Shape files for this program), utilizing phonetic spelling to overcome inability to spell streets in database (e.g.: Via, Villa, etc.). Multiple Address Locations: Software must have the capability to locate multiple addresses on a single parcel (e.g.: shopping centers, and apartment complexes) and integrate with the current version of the pre-plan program. Maintenance: Software provider shall provide annual software technical support and upgrades. Upgrades shall include Hazardous Materials Reference Guide (ERG). Technical support shall be available twenty-four hours per day, seven days a week. It is preferred that Technical support be available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week from a West Coast technician fully knowledgeable with the software capabilities and hardware configurations. Training: · Software provider shall provide a minimum of two (2) days on-site training for 6 City employees ('l'rain the Installer / System Administrator). · Software provider shall provide a minimum of one (1) day's on-site training for 8 City employees (Train the Trainer). Pricin Sheet Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price Software Licenses 15 Note: purchase of licenses will be phased in 3 stages Vehicle Set-ups 10 Software Set-up Per License Interface Set-up Maintenance Agreement annual Technical Support annual (available 24/7) Post Installation Support Integration Testing Training 6 employees (Configuration, installer, system administrator) Training 8 employees ('rrein the trainer) Manuals / Training Guides 15 Subtotal Sales Tax Labor Other Costs (please itemize) P:~Degange/MobileMapping. RFP CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Attach a statement of qualifications outlining vendor's corporate profile and experience in providing mobile mapping / first response software as required by this RFP. 2. Attach a list of client references, to include the following information for each reference: Reference Company Name Point of Contact Company Street Address City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number 3. Attach a statement of warranty for the software, and any installation to be provided. 4. Attach a copy of all City, County, Federal and State licenses required, as applicable. 5. Selected Vendor will provide the following documentation upon execution of the contract: 1. Certificate of Insurance and required endorsements for. Workers Compensation, . General Liability, Automobile Liability, Excess/Umbrella Liability, and Personal Property Damage. 2. Vendor understands the purchase of the software will be done in a three (3) stage process. Vendor also agrees to acceptance testing and acknowledges that no payment will be made by the City until the acceptance testing is approved and authorized by both the vendor and City of Temecula authorized Fire representative for each phase of implementation. Vendor warrants to the City that technical support can be provided twenty-four hours per day, seven days a week by a fully knowledgeable West Coast technician of the software company. By signing this RFP, Vendor has read and will comply with all terms and conditions herein. Signature of Authorized Representative Name and Title P:~Degange/MoblleMapping,RFP EXHIBIT C Plant Equipment, Inc. Software Maintenance Agreement 960829 11086-00001 sas 1480191 0 - l ]. - QUIPAAENT, INC. 42505 Rio Nedo Temecula, CA. 92590 Tel. 909.-676-4802 Fax 909-676-9651 http://www.peinc.com Software Support Program CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY INFORMATION This document and the products it describes are the property of Plant Equipment, Inc. This document may not be transferred from the custody er control of Plant Equipment, Inc. except as authorized by Plant Equipment, Inc. This Document is for informational purposes only. PLANT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. Copyright 1997 Plant Equipment, Inc. - All rights reserved. SO--ARE SUPPORT PROGRAM JUNE 2, 1998 PLANT EQUIPMENT INC. Software Support Program Plant Equipment Inc. ("PEI") provides software support to all licensed users of the VESTA, MAARS-View and Magic products. In consideration for the software support fee, PEI provides the software support services as outlined in the following paragraphs of this program. Software is defined as computer program instructions that facilitate functionality within hardware. Two main types of software are system software (operating systems, i.e. Windows NT), which controls the working of the computer, and application software that is designed to perform specific tasks. VESTA, MAARS-View, and MagiC are examples of application software. Term of the Soft~vare Support Program The software support program can be purchased in either a 3-year term. The term commences on the date the software is shipped from PEI. Condition of the Software Support Program In order to keep the software support program active, the user, defined as the pady ordedng the software form PEI, is required to maintain a PEI sof[~vare release that is within 12 months from the most current PEI software release. The software release date is determined by the date of the related product release notice (PCN). In addition, any alterations made to the PEI software product by anyone outside of PEI will terminate the software support program, unless PEI provides written consent to the alterations. Hardware Operational Environment It is the users responsibility to ensure that the hardware-operating environment is fully functional and meets PEI's minimum operating requirements for PEI's soflware product(s). It is the users responsibility to ensure that the operating system is fully functional, commercially available (except as othen,vise agreed to by PEI) and meets PEI's minimum operating requirements for PEI's software product(s). However, PEI will provide service pack updates on operating systems when applicable. The user does have the option of purchasing a software support program, which includes any workstation and server operating system upgrades required by PEI software. pLANT EQUIPMENT, INC. - CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PAGE 2 SOF'n/VARE SUPPORT PROGRAbl JUNE 2, 1998 Telephone Support As part of the software support program, PEI provides 7 day / 24 hour unlimited access to our technical support team via our toll free number, 1-800-491-1734. Software program fixes are defined as resolutions to problems that result from a defect in the software product or supplied documentation. If it is determined that a software program correction is necessary, you will be provided a product fix at no additional charge. The program fix will be incorporated into a software program update (see below) as soon as the modification can be propedy developed, documented, and tested. If necessary, PEI will provide on site assistance to accommodate the fix. For the sake of accurete clarification as to the detected problem, you may be asked to submit a written description of the problem including date, time, position, call-taker ID, and a general description of the problem. Software Program Updates Software program updates are defined as minor enhancements to the already purchased product feature / functionality set. A product change is classified as minor, at the discretion of PEI, based upon the impact of the change to the core functionality of the product. Ail software program updates, which occur within the term of the originally purchased software support program, will be made available to the user at no additional charge at the time the product update is released. Software program updates will roll into the existing software support program, thereby not extending the term of the software support program. Any change in the two numbers following the decimal point within the product version number will constitute a software program update (for example a change from product version 1.10 to 1.20, or 2.11 to 2.12, or 3.20 to 3.30 et al will represent a software program update). Software Program Upgrades Software program upgrades are defined as major enhancements to the already purchased product feature / functionality set. A product change is classified as major, at the discretion of PEI, based upon the impact of the change to the core functionality of the product. All software program upgrades, which occur within the term of the originally purchased software support program, will be made available to the user at no additional charge at the time the product upgrade is released. Soft, rare program upgrades will roll into the existing software support program, thereby not extending the term of the software support program. Any change in the numbers preceding the decimal point within the product version number will constitute a software program upgrade (for example a change from product version 1.40 to 2.00, or 2.11 to 3.00, or 3.20 to 4.00 et al will represent a software program upgrade). Software Program Rec~ve~, Tools Software based installation and recovery tools will be made available at no charge at the time such tools became available. PLANT EQUIPMENT, INC, - CONFIDENTIAL INFORblATION PAGE 3 SOF'~NARE SUPPORT PROGRAM JUNE 2, 1998 New Softve Modules New software modules are defined as separate and significant functionality outside the already purchased feature set of the software product. New software modules will be made available at a to be determined pdce upon its release. An example of a new software module would be the Instant Recall Recording for Radio functionality for the VESTA product and it is distinguished by a separate part number and related software support fee. On-site installation or project management support Training On site installation and / or project management services are not covered under this software support program and will be billable at the then current rate plus any associated expenses. Training is not covered under this software support program and will be billable at the then current rate plus any associated expenses. Integration Unks Integration links are not covered under this software support program and will be billable at an established rate (if non-custom) or at a mutually agreed upon rate (if custom). Con'ection of Errom Caused by the Followin9 (including but not limited to) 1) The operation of the software in a manner other than that currenfiy specified by PEI. 2) The failure of the user to provide suitable qualified and adequately trained operating. 3) Incompatible or faulty custemer equipment. Other Se~ices Other services not specifically identified as being included in the support services provided section of this program are not included. PLANT EQUIPMENT, INC. - CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PAGE 4 EXHIBIT D Plant Equipment, Inc. Software License Agreement 960829 11086-00001 s~s 1480191 0 - 12 - End-User License Agreement for Plant Equipment, Inc. (PEI) Software IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY: THIS PRODUCT CONTAINS THE PEI SOFTWARE PRODUCT IDENTIFIED HEREIN ("SOFTWARE") AND OTHER PROPRIETARY MATERIAL, THE USE OF WHICH IS SUBJECT TO THIS END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT ("EULA"). [OPENING THE SEALED ENVELOPE/USING THE SOFTWARE] CONSTITUTES YOUR ASSENT TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF THIS EULA, INCLUDING THE WARRANTY, SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND ANY DISCLAIMERS SET FORTH IN THIS DOCUMENT. IF "YOU" (I.E. THE REGISTERED USER OF THE SOFTWARE AND ITS AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES) DO NOT AGREE WITH ALL THE TERMS, YOU MUST RETURN THIS PRODUCT [WITH THE ENVELOPE STILL SEALED], ALL MANUALS AND DOCUMENTATION TO THE PLACE YOU OBTAINED THEM, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF FIRST ACQUIRING THIS PRODUCT. WRITTEN APPROVAL IS NOT A PREREQUISITE TO THE VALIDITY OR ENFORCEABILITY OF THIS AGREEMENT AND NO SOLICITATION OF ANY SUCH WRITTEN APPROVAL BY OR ON BEHALF OF PEI SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS AN INFERENCE TO THE CONTRARY. IF YOU HAVE ORDERED THIS PRODUCT, PEI'S ACCEPTANCE IS EXPRESSLY CONDITIONAL ON YOUR ASSENT TO THESE TERMS TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHER TERMS; IF THESE TERMS ARE CONSIDERED AN OFFER BY PEI, ACCEPTANCE IS EXPRESSLY LIMITED TO THESE TERMS. 1 SOFTWARE LICENSE AND RESTRICTIONS. Subject to all the terms and conditions of this Agreement, PEI hereby grants you, under PEI's rights in the Software, a personal, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive license to use one (1) copy of the Software, in object code form only, on a single CPU. You may not, directly or indirectly, (i) reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or otherwise attempt to discover the source code or underlying ideas or algorithms of the Software; (ii) modify, translate, or create derivative works based onthe Software; (iii) copy (except for archival purposes), rent, lease, distribute, assign, or otherwise transfer rights to the Software, except as otherwise provided herein; (iv) use the Soi~ware for timesharing or service bureau purposes or otherwise for the benefit of a third party; (v) use or allow the transfer, transmission, export, or re-export of the Software in violation of any export control laws or regulations administered by the U.S. Commerce Department, OFAC, or any other government agency; or (vi) remove any proprietary notices or labels on the Software. As between the parties, you acknowledge that PEI retains ownership of the Software, any portions or copies thereof, and all rights therein. All rights not expressly granted to you are reserved to PEI. All the limitation and restrictions of this Agreement also apply to all accompanying documentation and materials. 2 TERMINATION The Agreement and all licenses will terminate if you fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this EULA. Upon notice of termination you shall immediately, at PEI's option, destroy, or return to PEI at your expense, the Software, all copies thereof, any updates, and all accompanying documentation and materials. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the terms of the Agreement shall survive termination. Termination is not an exclusive remedy and all other remedies will be available whether or not termination OCCurS. UPDATES Updated versions of the Software may be created or issued by PEI from time to time. If the SoRware is an upgrade ora PEI product, you now may use that upgraded product only in accordance with this EULA. PEI may, at its sole discretion, require the installation of software updates, provided to you without additional cost, to maintain the Warranty Provisions. MEDIA You may receive the Software in more than one medium. Regardless of the type or size of medium you receive, you may use only one medium that is appropriate for your single computer. You may not use or install the other medium on another computer. You may not loan, rent, lease, or otherwise transfer the other medium to another user, except as part of the permanent transfer of the Software as provided herein. LIMITED WARRANTY AND DISCLAIMER PEI warrants to (and only to) you for a period of ninety (90) days following original delivery of the Software from PEI or PEI's authorized representative or distributor, as evidenced by dated shipping documents, (i) that such Software will materially conform to PEI's then current user documentation for such Product; (ii) and that the media on which the Software is furnished will be free from defects in materials and workmanship under normal use. This warranty covers only problems reported to PEI during the warranty period. If the deficiency is to be repaired or replaced, PEI will undertake (and your sole remedy shall be) to correct within a reasonable period of time any reported "SoRware Error" (failure of the Software to perform substantially the functions described in the documentation), correct significant errors in the documentation, and replace any magnetic media which proves defective in materials or workmanship, or refund the license fee. PEI shall not be responsible for any defect that results from your abuse, misuse, or other conduct or conditions outside the control ofPEI. PEI makes no warranty or representation that the information or functions contained in the Software will meet your requirements, that the operation of the Software will be uninterrupted or error free, or that all software and documentation defects are correctable or will be corrected. PEI makes no warranty or representation that updated versions of the Software will be created or issued with specific functional enhancements or modifications. PEI does not warrant performance of any third party hardware, software or services provided by PEI or endorsed for the specific purpose of operating with the Software. However, where reasonably possible, PEI shall pass on to you any such third party warranty. PEI is not responsible for problems caused by changes in the operating characteristics of computer hardware or computer operating systems which are made after release of the software, or problems resulting from use of the Software with third party computer hardware components, system or configuration. EXCEPT FOR THE FOREGOING, THE SOFTWARE, OR ANY SERVICE PROVIDED BY OR THROUGH PEI ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMiTATION, ANY WARRANTY OR MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NONINFRINGEMENT. FURTHER, PEI DOES NOT WARRANT RESULTS OF USE, OR THAT THE SOFTWARE IS BUG FREE, OR THAT ITS USE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW LIMITATIONS ON DURATION OF AN IMPLIED WARRANTY, SO THE ABOVE MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU. LIMiTATION OF LIABILITY NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING ELSE IN THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHERWISE, AND EXCEPT FOR BODILY iNJURY, PEI SHALL NOT BE LIABLE OR OBLIGATED WITH RESPECT TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT OR UNDER ANY CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY (I) FOR ANY AMOUNT ACTUALLY PAID TO PEI FOR THE SOFTWARE AND/OR ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTATION AND MATERIALS; (II) FOR ANY COST OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS, TECHNOLOGY, SERVICES OR RIGHTS; (HI) FOR ANY INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES; (IV) FOR INTERRUPTION OF USE OR LOSS OR CORRUPTION OF DATA; OR (V) FOR ANY MATTER BEYOND ITS REASONABLE CONTROL. MISCELLANEOUS Any notice, report, approval or consent required or permitted hereunder shall be made in writing to: Plant Equipment, Inc. P.O. Box 9007 Temecula, CA 92589-9007 (909) 719-2100 PEI may assign this Agreement in whole or in part. No failure or delay in exercising any right hereunder will operate as a waiver thereof, nor will any partial exemise of any right or power hereunder preclude further exercise. If any provision of this Agreement shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or invalid, that provision shall be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that this Agreement shall otherwise remain in full fome and effect and enforceable. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been made in, and shall be construed pursuant to the laws of the State of California and the United States without regard to conflicts of laws provisions thereof, and without regard to the United States Convention on the International Sale of Goods. Any waivers or amendments shall be effective only if made in writing. This Agreement is the complete and exclusive statement of the mutual understanding of the parties and supersedes and cancels all previous written and omi agreements and communications relating to the subject'matter of this Agreement. The prevailing party in any action to enforce this Agreement will be entitled to recover its attorney's fees and costs in connection with such action. EXHIBIT E Plant Equipment, Inc. Price Sheet & City of Temecula Cost Implementation By Phase 960829 t1056~0001 sas 1480191 0 ~ 13 - LLI Z Z ITEM 6 APPROV~(~/, ~ CITY ATTORNEY /)/'//vt~ ,~ ,.~.~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~'" CITY MANAGER //J~') t, TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services~. September 11,2001 Acceptance of a Park Improvement Bonds and Agreement for Park Site A in the Crowne Hill Development PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst ~'~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the agreement and surety bonds from Crowne Meadows, L.P., a Washington limited partnership to develop Park Site A in the Crowne Hill Development. BACKGROUND: Located on the southeasterly corner of Butterfield Stage and Pauba Roads, Tract No. 23143 (Crowne Hill) has been approved for a 459 acre subdivision consisting of 1,024 tract homes and twenty eight (28) Rancheros. Pursuant to the Park Improvement Agreement dated August 28, 1996 the developer is required to develop Park Site A. This park site is 4.5 acres and is located at the corner of Pauba Drive and Via Del Monte within the Crowne Hill Development. This Park Site may not be constructed for several years. As per the Park Improvement Agreement Park Site A shall be fully developed and offered for dedication to the City of Temecula prior to issuance of the 950th building permit. To date there have been 249 building permits issued. To insure that the future park is constructed to City standards, the developer is required to post security so that the park improvements are developed as per approved landscape/irrigation plans. As a result, Crowne Meadows, L.P., a Washington limited partnership has entered into an agreement with the City and has provided surety bonds, issued by The American Motorist Insurance Company, as follows: 1. Faithful Performance Bond No. 3SM99027300 the amount of $977,400.00. 2. Labor and Materials Bond No. 3SM99027300 in the amount of $488,700.00. Upon completion and acceptance of the improvements by the City Council, staff will recommend the appropriate release or reduction of the bonds. FISCAL IMPACT: borne by the developer. None. The cost of construction for the landscaped medians will be ATTACHMENTS: Agreement/Bonds. Vicinity Map Crowne Hill Park Site A CITY OF TEMECULA PARKLAND / LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AGREE/VIENT DATE OF AGREEMENT: NAME OF SUBDIVIDER: NAME OF SUBDIVISION: TRACT NO.: 23143 All~1,Rr 13, 2001 Crowne Meadows, L.P., a Washington limited partnership (Referred to as "SUBDIVIDER") Crowna Hil] (Referred to as "SUBDIVIDF_,R") TENTATIVE MAP RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO.: (Referred to as "Resolution of Approval") PARKLAND IMPROVEMENT PLANS NO.: (Referred to as ".Resolution of Approval") ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF PARKLAND IMPROVEMENTS: $ 977.400.00 COMPLETION DATE: ~ NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND: American Motorists Insurance Company Bond Number 3SM99027300 NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND: Amor~omn Mmrmr~grg T~g,,rmn~p Cnm.nnny Bond Number 3SM99027300 NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR WARRANTY BOND: This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Temecula, California a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the SUBDIVIDER. RECITALS A. SUBDIVIDER has presented to CITY for approval and recordation, a final subdivision map of a proposed subdivision pursuant to provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the rifling, approval and recordation of subdivision maps. The Subdivision Map Act and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the riding, approval and recordation of subdivision maps are collectively referred to in this Agreement as the "Subdivision Laws." B. A tentative map of the .SUBDIVISION has been approved, subject to the Subdivision Laws and to the requirements and conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. The Resolution of Approval is on rifle in the Office of the City Clerk and is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. C. SUBDIVIDER is required as a condition of the approval of the tentative map that the Parkland Improvement plans must be completed, in compliance with City standards, by the Completion Date. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a final map, that the SUBDIVIDER has entered into a secured Agreement with the CITY to complete the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans within the Completion Date. D. In consideration of approval of a final map for the SUBDIVISION by the City Council, SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into this Agreement, whereby promises to install and complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the Parkland/Landscape Improvement work required by City in connection with proposed subdivision. Subdivider has secured this agreement by Parkland/Landscaping Improvement Security required by the Subdivision Laws and .approved by the City Attorney. The term "Parkland" includes landscape areas intended to be maintained by the Temecula Community Services District. E. Complete Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans for the construction, installation and completion of the Parkland Improvements have been prepared by SUBDIVIDER and approved by the Director of Community Services. The Parkland Improvement Plans numbered as referenced previously in this Agreement are on file in the Office of the Director of Community Services and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. All references in this Agreement to the Parkland Improvement Plans shall include reference to any specifications for the Improvements as approved by the Director of Community Services. F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the Parkland Improvements according to the Improvement Plans has been made and approved by the Director of Community Services. The estimated amount is stated on Page I of this Agreement. The basis for the estimate is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement. G. The CITY has adopted standards for the construction and installation of Parkland/Landscape Improvements within the CITY. The Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans have been prepared in conformance with the CITY standards, (in effect on the date of approval of the Resolution of Approval). H. SUBDIVIDER recognizes that by approval of the final map for SUBDIVISION, CITY has conferred substantial rights upon SUBDIVIDER, including the right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the SUBDIVISION, and has taken the final act necessary to subdivide the property within the SUBDMSION. As a result, CITY will be damaged to the extent of the cost of installation of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform File: R:~I ~CO NT RACTS~LN DSC APE. AG R 3 its obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S obligation to complete construction of Parkland/Landscape Improvements by the Completion Date. CITY shall be entitled to all remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement and the Subdivision Laws in the event of a default by SUBDIVIDER. It is specifically recognized that the determination of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of the SUBDIVISION constitutes an adequate remedy for default by the SUBDIVIDER shall be within the sole discretion of CITY. NOW, TH~REFORE, in consideration of the approval and recordation by the City Council of the final map of the SUBDIVISION, SUBDIVIDER and CITY agree as follows; 1. SUBDIVIDER'S Obligations to Construct Parkland/Landscape Improvements. SUBDIVIDER Shall: a. Comply with all the requirements of the Resolution of Approval, and any amendments thereto, and with the provisions of the Subdivision Laws. b. Complete by the time established in Section 20 of this Agreement and at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Work required on the Tentative Map and Resolution of Approval in conformance with the Parkland Improvement Plans and the CITY standards: c. Furnish the necessary materials for completion of the Parkland Improvements in conformity with the Parkland Improvement Plans and CITY standards. d. Except for easements or other interests in real property to be dedicated to the homeowners association of the SUBDIVISION, acquire and dedicate, or pay the cost of acquisition by CITY, of all rights-of-way, easements and other interests in real property for construction or installation of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances for the SUBDIVIDER'S obligations with regard to acquisition by CITY of off-site rights-of-way, easements and other interests in real property shall be subject to a separate Agreement between SUBDIVIDER and CITY. 2. Acquisition and Dedication of Easements or Rights-of-Way. If any of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements and land development work contemplated by this Agreement are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or installation shall be commenced before: a. The offer of dedication to CITY or appropriate rights-of-way, easements or other interest in real property, and appropriate authorization from the property owner to allow construction or installation of the Improvements or work, or The dedication to, and acceptance by, the CITY of appropriate rights-of-way, easements or other interests in real property, and approved by the Department of Public Works, as determined by the Director of Community Services. C. The issuance by a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the State Eminent Domain Law of an order of possession. SUBDIVIDER shall comply in all respects with order of possession. Nothing in this Section 2 shall be construed as authorizing or granting an extension of time to SUBDIVIDER. 3. Security.. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times guarantee SUBDMDER'S performance of this Agreement by furnishing to CITY, and maintaining, good and sufficient ~e~.. u¢~y as required by the Subdivision Laws on forms approved by CITY for the purposes and in the amounts as follows: a. to assure faithful performance of this Agreement in regard to said improvements in and amount of 100% of the estimated cost of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements; and b. to secure payment to any contractor, subcontractor, persons renting equipment, or furnishing labor materials for Parkland/Landscape Improvements required to be constructed or installed pursuant to this Agreement in the additional amount of 50% of the estimated cost of the Improvements; and c. to guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant to this Agreement for a period of one year following acceptance thereof by CITY against any defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished in the additional amount of 10% of the estimated cost of the Parkland Improvements. The securities required by this Agreement shall be kept on ~e with the City Clerk. The terms of the security documents referenced on Page 1 of this Agreement are incorporated into this Agreement by this Reference. If any security is replaced by another approved security, the replacement shah be fi]ed with the City Clerk and, upon f'ffing, shall be deemed to have been made a pan of and incorporated into this Agreement. Upon filing of a replacement security with the City Clerk, the former security may be released. 4. Alterations to Parkland Improvement Plans. a. Any changes, alterations or additions to the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans and specifications or to the improvements, not exceeding 10% of the original estimated cost if the improvement, which are mutually agreed upon by the CITY and SUBDIVIDER, shall not relieve the improvement security given for faithful performance of this Agreement. In the event such changes, alterations, or additions exceed 10% of the original estimated cost of the improvement, SUBDIVIDER shall provide improvement security for faithful performance as required by Paragraph 3 of this Agreement for 100 % of the total estimated cost of the improvement as changed, altered, or amended, minus any completed partial releases allowed by Paragraph 6 of this Agreement. b. The SUBDIVIDER shall construct the Parkland Improvements in accordance with the CITY Standards in effect at the time of adoption of the Resolution of Approval. CITY reserves the right to modify the standards applicable to the SUBDIVISION and this Agreement, when necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare or comply with applicable State or federal law or CITY zoning ordinances. If SUBDIVIDER requests and is granted an extension of time for completion of the improvements, CITY may apply the standards in effect at the time of the extension. 5. In,?ection and Maintenance Period. a. SUBDIVIDER shall obtain City inspection of the parkland/Landscape Improvements in accordance with the City standards in effect at the time of adoption of the Resolution of Approval. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain proper facilities and safe access for inspection of the Parkland Improvements by CITY inspectors and to the shops wherein any work is in preparation. Upon completion of the work the SUBDIVIDER may request a f'mal inspection by the Director of Community Services, or the Director of Community Service's authorized representative. If the Dkector of Community Services, or the designated representative, determine that the work has been completed in accordance with this Agreement, then the Director of Community CITY standards. certification. 6. _R_clease of Securities. Services shah certify the completion of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements to the Board of Directors. b. SUBDIVIDER shah continue to maintain the Parkland/Landscape Improvements for ninety (90) days after they have been certified completed. No improvements shall be finally accepted unless the maintenance period has expired, and aH aspects of the work have been inspected and determined to have been completed in accordance with the Parkland/Landscape Improvet:nent Plans and SUBDIVIDER shah bear all costs of inspection and Subject to approval by the Board of Directors of the Community Services District of the CITY, the securities required by this Agreement shall be released as follows: a. Security given for faithful performance of any act, obligation, work or Agreement shall be released upon the expiration of the maintenance period and the final completion and acceptance of the act or work, subject to the provisions of subsection (b) hereof. b. The Director of Community Services may release a portion of the security given for faithful performance of improvement work as the Parkland Improvement progresses upon application therefore by the SUBDIVIDER; provided, however, that no such release shall be for an amount less that 25 % of the total Parkland Improvement Security given for faithful performance of the improvement work and that the security shall not be reduced to an amount less than 50 % of the total Landscape/Parkland Improvement Security given for faithful performance until expiration of the maintenance period and final completion and acceptance of the improvement work. In no event shall the Director of Community Services authorize a release of the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Security which would reduce such security to an amount below that required to guarantee the completion of the improvement work and any other obligation imposed by this Agreement. c. Security given to secure payment to the contractor, his or her subcontractors and to persons furnishing labor, materials or equipment shall, six months after the completion and acceptance of the work, be reduced to an amount equal to the total claimed by all claimants for whom lien have been filed and of which notice has been given to the legislative body, plus an amount reasonably determined by the Director of Community Services to be required to assure the performance of any other obligations secured by the Security. The balance of the security shall be released upon the settlement of all claims and obligations for which the security was given. d. No security given for the guarantee or warranty of work shah be released until the expiration of the warranty period and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. As provided in paragraph 10, the warranty period shall not commence until final acceptance of all work and improvements by the City Council. e. The CITY may retain from any security released, and amount sufficient to cover costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 7. !~ury to Public Improvements. Public Property or Public Utilities Facilities. SUBDIVIDER shall replace or have replaced, or repair or have repaired, as the case may be, all public improvements, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which are destroyed or damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done under this Agreement. SUBDIVIDER shall bear the entire cost of replacment or repairs of any and all public property on public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done. Under this agreement whether such property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the CITY or any public or private utility corporation or by any combination or such owners. Any repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer. 8. permits. SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER"S expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction and installation of the improvements, give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. 9. Default of SUBDIVIDER. a. Default of SUBDIVIDER shall include, but not be limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely commence construction pursuant to this Agreement; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely complete construction of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely cure any defect in the Parkland/Landscape Improvements; SLrBI~IVIDER'S failure to perform substantial construction work for a period of 20 calendar days after commencement of the work; SUBDIVIDER'S insolvency, appointment of a receiver, or the I-ding of any petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or involuntary which SUBDIVIDER fails to discharge within thirty (30) days; the commencement of a foreclosure action against the SUBDIVISION or a portion thereof, or any conveyance in lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or SUBDIVIDER's failure to perform any other obligation under this Agreement. b. The CITY reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or in equity for breach of SUBDIVIDER's obligations under this Agreement. The CITY shall have the right, subject to this section, to draw upon or utilize the appropriate security to mitigate CITY damages in event of default by SUBDIVIDER. The right of CITY to draw upon or utilize the security is additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY. It is specifically recognized that the estimated costs and security amounts may not reflect the actual cost of construction or installation of Parkland/Landscape Improvements and, therefore, CITY damages for SUBDIVIDER'S default shall be measured by the cost of completing the required improvements. The sums provided by the improvement security may be used by CITY for the completion of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements in accordance with the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans and specifications contained herein. In the event of SLrBDIVIDER'S default under this Agreement, SUBDIVIDER authorizes CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER'S Surety, and agrees to pay the entire cost of such performance by CITY. CITY may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method CITY may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDIVIDER'S Surety shall be liable to CITY for any excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and, in such event, CITY, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utili?.e in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant and other property belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work and necessary for performance of the work. c. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall constitute consent to the ftling by CITY of a notice of violation against all the lots in the SLrBDIVISION, or to rescind the approval or otherwise revert the SUBDIVISION to acreage. The remedy provided by this Subsection C is in addition to and not in lieu of other remedies available to CITY. SUBDIVIDER agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for SUBDIVIDER'S breach shall be in the discretion of CITY. d. In the event that SUBDIVIDER fails to perform any obligation hereunder, SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by CITY in securing performance of such obligations, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney' s fees. e. The failure of CITY to take an enforcement action with respect to a default, or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default or breach or any subsequent default or breach of SUBDIVIDER. 10. Warranty. SUBDIVIDER shall guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant to this Agreement for a period of one year after expiration of the maintenance period and f'mal acceptance by the City Council of the work and improvements against any defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished. Where Parkland/Landscape Improvements are to be constructed in phases or sections, the one year warranty period shall commence after City acceptance of the last completed improvement. If within the warranty perjod any work or improvement or part of any work or improvement done, furnished, installed, constructed or caused to be done, furnished, installed or constructed by SUBDIVIDER fails to fulf'fll any of the requirements of this Agreement or the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans and specificatic;ns referred to here'm, SUBDIVIDER shall without delay and without any cost to CITY, repair or replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or structure. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, SUBDIVIDER hereby authorizes CITY, at CITY option, to perform the work twenty days after mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER's Surety and agrees to pay the cost of such work by CITY. Should CITY determine that an urgency requires repairs or replacements to be made before SUBDIVIDER can be notified, CITY may, in its sole discretion, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and SUBDIVIDER shall pay to CITY the cost of such repairs. 11. SUBDIVIDER Not Agent of CITY. Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER'S agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this Agreement. 12. Injury. to Work. Until such time as the Parkland/Landscape Improvements are accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the improvements constructed or installed. CITY shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to the work or improvements specified in this Agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the work or improvements. All such ri~ks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby assumed by SUBDIVIDER. 13. ~)2h~. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude CITY from expending monies pursuant to agreements concurrently or previously executed between the parties, or from entering into agreement with other subdividers for the apportionment of costs of water and sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant to the provisions of the CITY ordinances providing therefore, nor shall anything in this Agreement commit CITY to any such apportionment. 14. SUBDIVIDER'S Obligation to Warn Public During Construction. Until final acceptance of the Parkland Improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning to the public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said improvements, and will take all reasonable actions to protect the public from such dangerous condition. 15. 7:/2~1g~0~. Upon acceptance of work on behalf of CITY and recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement shall vest in CITY. 16. Final Acceptance of Work. Acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY shall be made by the City Council upon recommendation of the Director of Community Services after final completion and inspection of all Parkland/Landscape Improvements. The Board of Directors shall act uPon the Director of Community Services recommendations within thirty (30) _day~,fr.om the date the Director of Community Services certifies that the work has finally completed, as provided in Paragraph 5. Such acceptance shall not constitute a waiver of defects by CITY. 17. Indemnity/Hold Harmless. CITY or any officer or employee thereof shall not be liable for any injury to persons or property occasioned by reason of the acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this Agreement. SUBDIVIDER further agrees to protect and hold harmless CITY, its officials and employees from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, liability or loss of any sort, because of, or arising out of, acts or omissions or SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this Agreement, including all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of, or arising out of, in whole or in part, the design or construction of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements. This indemnification and Agreement to hold harmless shall extend to injuries to persons and damages or taking of property resulting from the design or construction of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements as provided here'm, and in addition, to adjacent property owners as a consequence of the diversion of waters from the design or construction of public dra'mage systems, streets and other public improvements. Acceptance of any of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements shall not constitute any assumption by the CITY of any responsib'dity for any damage or taking covered by this paragraph. CITY shall not be responsible for the design or construction of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements pursuant to the approved Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans, regardless of any negligent action or inaction taken by the CITY in approving the plans, unless the particular improvement design was specifically required by CITY over written objection by SUBDIVIDER submitted to the Director of Community Services before approval of the paJlicular improvement design, which objection indicated that the particular improvement design was dangerous or defective and suggested an alternative safe and feasible design. After acceptance of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements, the SUBDIVIDER shall remain obligated to eliminate any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by the design or construction defect, however, SUBDIVIDER shall not be responsible for routine maintenance. Provisions of this paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten years following the acceptance by the CITY of Parkland/Landscape Improvements. It is the intent of this section that SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for all liability for design and construction of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements installed or work done pursuant to this Agreement and that CITY shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or in approving, reviewing or inspecting any work or The improvement security shall not be required to cover the provision of this construction. paragraph. 18. Sale or Di .sposition of SUBDIVISION. Sale or other disposition of this property will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the obligations set forth herein. If SUBDIVIDER sells the property or any portion of the property within the SUBDIVISION to any other person, the SUBDIVIDER may request a novation of this Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon approval of the novation and substitution of securities, the SUBDIVIDER may request a release or reduction of the securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve the SUBDIVIDER of the obligations under Paragraph 17 for the work or improvement done by SUBDIVIDER. 19. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. 20. Time for Completion of Work Extensions. SUBDIVIDER shall complete construction of the improvements required by this Agreement no later than · In the event good cause exists as determined by the City Engineer, and if otherwise permitted under the tentative map condition, the time for completion of the improvements hereunder may be extended. The extension shall be made by writing executed by the Director of Commurdty Services. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDF_,R'S Surety and shall not affect the validity of this Agreement or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given for this Agreement. The Director of Community Services shall be the sole and f'mal judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension. Delay, other than delay in the commencement of work, resulting from an act of CITY, or by an act of God, which SUBDIVIDER could not have reasonably foreseen, or by storm or inclement weather which prevents the conducting of work, or by strikes, boycotts, similar actions by employees or labor organizations, which prevent the conducting or work, and which were not caused by or contributed to by SUBDIVIDER, shah constitute good cause for an extension of time for completion. As a condition of such extension, the Director of Community Services may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performance of this Agreement as extended in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction costs as determined by the Director of Community Services. 21. J~lf.~12dgl~. Performance by SUBDIVIDER of this Agreement shall not be construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S rights with respect to any change in any change in any zoning or building law or ordinance. 22. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change of address is filed with the City: Notice to CITY: City Clerk City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Notice to SUBDIVIDF_R: Communities Southwest Attn: Mary Rauschenburg 181 Old Springs Road Anaheim, CA 92808 23. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect un]ess amended or modified by the mutual consent of the parties. 24. Captions. The captions of this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall not define, explain, modify, limit, exemplify, or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of any provisions of this Agreement. 25. '~ A ' ' . In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to enforce the terms of this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to litigation costs and reasonable attorney's fees. 26. into the terms of this agreement. 27. ~. lncom, oration of Recitals. The recitals to this agreement are hereby in..cg, rpomted This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representative of the parties. In the case of the CITY, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager. IN:WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by CITY, by and ~rough its ~M..ayor. Crowne Meadows, L.P., a Washington limited partnership By: CSW Development & Construction Copmany SUBDIVIDER CITY OF TEMECULA (fka: Communities Southwest Development & Construction Company), a Washington Corp. Its general partner By: Mayor Name: Mar~ Rausch~burg Title: Vice President, Deveopment Name: Brent C. Anderson rifle: Senior Vice President (Proper Notarization of SUBDIVIDER'S signature is required and shah be attached) AT1 I~ST: By: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: Name: City Engineer By: Name: Director of Community Services APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter Thorson City Attorney CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF Orange ) On Auqust 13, 2001, before me, Nicole Manson, a Notary Public, personally appeared Mary Rauschenburg and Brent C. Andemon, personally known to me P ................................. ,,~,~ ......... to be the person s whose name(s),.ishare subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that ~--~'/they executed the same in J3ie~ber/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by bie/fledtheir signatures on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature RBF CONSULTING ~x~IBIT A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Tract Map 23143-F-Park Site "A" August 1, 2001 Prepared by: John Andrew, Landscape Architect JN 10-101545.001 Item Number Description Qty. Unit Unit Cost Total 1 Restroom 1 LS $125,000.00 $125,000.00 2 Lighting and Electrical 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00 3 PCC Pavement 19,500 SF $6.00 $117,000.00 4 PCC Play Area Edge 380 LF $20.00 $7,600.00 5 Play Ground Equipment 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 6 HC Play Surface 2,100 SF $15.00 $31,500.00 7 6 x 12 PCC Mow Curb 30 LF $8.00 $240.00 8 Playground Sand 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 9 6 x 6 PCC Mow Curb 27 LF $6.00 $162.00 10 2 x 4 RDWD Header 455 LF $4.00 $1,820.00 11 Basketball Court 4,850 LS $7.50 $36,375.00 12 DG Equestrian Trail 6,700 SF $1.50 $10,050.00 13 Entry Sign 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 14 PCC Bench w/Back 4 EA $1,200.00 $4,800.00 15 PCC Bench w/o Back 5 EA $1,000.00 $5,000.00 16 PCC HC Picnic Table 2 EA $1,500.00 $3,000.00 17 PCC Picnic Table 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 18 PCC Waste Receptacle 6 EA $300.00 $1,800.00 19 Metal BBQ 2 EA $450.00 $900.00 20 Picnic Shelter 2 EA $8,500.00 $17,000.00 21 Drinking Fountain and Service Line 1 L$ $4,600.00 $4,600.00 22 Polyethylene 3-Rail Fence 385 LF $15.00 $5,775.00 23 Polyethylene 3-Rail Fence and Mow Curb 790 LF $23.00 $18,170.00 24 3' High Vinyl Chain Link Fence 565 LF $22.00 $12,430.00 25 3' HJgh Vinyl Chain Link Gate 1 LS $75.00 $75.00 26 Removable Bollards 3 EA $60.00 $180.00 27 Bike Rack 1 EA $650.00 $650.00 RBF CONSULTING Item Number Description Qty. Unit Unit Cost Total 28 Basketball Equipment 1 EA $2,100.00 $2,100.00 29 Backflow Preventer 1 EA $2,500.00 $2,500.00 30 Master Valve and Flow Sensor 1 LS $750.00 $750.00 31 Controller & Controller Wire 1 LS ' $9,000.00 $9,000.00 32 Mainline and Ball Valves 1 LS $12,500.00 $12,500.00 33 Spray Irrigation System 1 LS $88,500.00 $88,500.00 34 Soil Preparation and Fine Grade 188,900 SF $0.45 $85,005.00 35 24" Box Trees 20 EA $250.00 $5,000.00 36 15 Gallon Trees 100 EA $85.00 $8,500.00 37 5 Gallon Trees 19 EA $45.00 $855.00 38 1 Gallon Trees 18 EA $8.00 $144.00 39 1 Gallon Vine 22 EA $8.00 $176.00 40 5 Gallon Shrubs 154 EA $18.00 $2,772.00 41 I Gallon Shrubs 1,857 EA $8.00 $14,856.00 42 D-40 Container 723 EA $2.50 $1,807.50 43 Rooted Cutting 246 EA $2.50 $615.00 44 Hydroseed Turf 109,500 SF $0.10 $10,950.00 45 Hydroseed Nurse 42,487 SF $0.08 $3,398.96 46 Mulch 12,000 SF $0.45 $5,400.00 47 90-Day Plant EstablishmentJMaintenance 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00 Subtotal: $814,456.46 20% Contingency: $162,891.29 TOTAL: $977,347.75 Note: The costs to construct street improvements associated with the park, grading, parking lot improvements, storm drain, sewer and water service ara included within the construction secudty worksheet prepared by RBF and submitted to the City on July 25, 2001. Since ENGINEER has no control over labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others or over the Contractor(s)' method of determining prices, or over the cornpetive bidding or market conditions, its opinions of probable Project Cost and Construction Cost provided herein are to be made on the basis of its experience and ~ represents its best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with th, !NGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that'proposals, bids or actual Project or construction cost ~ f probable cost. If pdor to the Bidding or Negotiating Phase, OWNER wishes greater assuran independent cost estimator. Approved by: st ' ~~loy an Surety Bond Review The attached surety bonds (American Motorists Insurance Company) have been reviewed. (Crown Meadows L.L.P, a Washington Limited Partnership) Bond # 3SM99027300 $ 977,400.00 $ 488,700.00 J~The surety company is an admitted company in the State of Califomia [--JThe admitted company was verified at www.insu rance.ca.gov/docs/fs/ad mitted.htm [--JThe surety company is not an admitted company in the State of Califomia Surety bond reference is A.M. Best 2000 version 071400 (A:FSC XV) Verified by: Grus P-apagolos, Senior Management Analyst Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND Bond #3SM99027300 WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and Crowne Meadows, L.L.P, a Washington Limited Partnership (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated ~LIt:EIS3r [~ ,200 [, and identified as Project Tract Map 23143-F Park Site "A",, is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WItEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, Principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and American Motorists Insurance Company as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen, and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of $488,700.00, lawful money of the United States, for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, the Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount set forth. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. If the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and City of Temecula Subdivision Labor and Materials Bond Page 2 void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on August I0,2001. [SEAL] [SEAL] SURETY American Motorists Insurance Company Attorney-In-Fact ( mae) PRINCIPAL Crowne Meadows, L.L.P., a Washington Limite(kPartnership APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney GENERAL ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Arizona County of Maricopa On August 3.0t 2003. Date personally appeared before me, Brandy L. Baicht Notary Public David G. 3ensen [] personally known to me [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacities and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal OFrI'/ONAL Though the data below is; not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPAC~I'Y CLA~MED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT (__) INDMDUAL (__) CORPORATE OFFICER Bond TITLE(S) TTrLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT (__) PARTNER(S) (__) LIMITED (__) (__) GENERAL NUMBER OF PAGES (~) A'FrORNEY-IN-FAC7 (._) TRUSTEE(S) (__) GUARDiAN/CONSERVATOR L) OTHER STGNER ZS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR Eh ~ 11Y(IES) American Moforists Insurance Company August 10~, 2001 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE I 'emPer . Home Office: Long Grove, tL 6O049 POWER OF A'FrORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists insurance Company, and the American Manufacturer~ Mutual Insurance Company, corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ilinois, having their principal office in Long Grove, Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the 'Company'} do hereby appoint Maryann Carafello, Michael C. Metzger, Brandy L. Belch, Thomas O. Wilder, Terry Crull and David G. Jensen of Phoenix, Arizona (EACH) ........................................................................................ their true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(s)-in-fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending on the date specified below, un]ess sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings *** ....... ************* .................. ****** ............ ***************** EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make, execute, seal and deJiver any pond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note, check, draft or letter of credit. This aulhority does not permit the same obligation to be split into two or more bonds in order to bring each such bond within the dollar limit of authority as set forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shaft be as binding upon the said Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by their ragulariy elected officers at their, principal office in Long Grove, I[tinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001 This Power of Attomey is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by the Executive Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Company on FebruaPj 23, 1988 at Chicago, Illinois, true and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undemigned Secretary as being in full force and effect: 'VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys-in-fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and-undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other wtitings, obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process." This Power of Attorney is signed, sea,ed and certified by facsimile under and by au~odty of the following resolution adopted by the Exscutive Committee of the Boards of D[ractors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certitioations by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company.' In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be affixed by their authorized officers, this June 26, 2001. Attested and Certified: ®¸® Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company Amedcan Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company Rober~ P. Hames, Secretary by J.S. Kemper, III, Exec. Vice President CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF Orange ) On Au.qust 13, 200'1, before me, Nicole Manson, a Notary Public, personally appeared John F. Suriano and Brent C. Anderson, personally known to me tJc; ~m;'cd t~ ;,-,~ c,;, t',-,~ b,~i~ u[ ~,~;.;~i'~.;.,~,y ~v=,~cr, c.r.) to be the person(s) whose name(s),.is'/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that .heCr-.-.-.-.-.-.-~/they executed the same in.his-'Cm~their authorized capacity(ies), and that by ~their signatures on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. CITY OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Bond #3SM99027300 WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and Crowne Meadows~ L.L.P~ a Washington Limited Partnership (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated {],LtClLtf~-~ 13 20 O_j_, and identified as Project Tract Map 23143-F Park Site "A", is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WFI~.REAS, Principal is required under the terms of the agreement to furnish a bond for the Faithful Performance of the agreement: NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and American Motorists Insurance Company as surety, are held and fh'mly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sam of ~77~400.00 lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally. The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and void if the above- bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, adminisUators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions in the agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to this or their ~ue intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated; otherwise, this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. City of Temecula Subdivision Faithful Performance Bond Page 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on ~, 2001. [SEAL] [SEAL] SURETY American Motorists Insurance Company PRINCIPAL Crowne Meadows, L.L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership /- (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ITEM 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE' CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council /~/illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 11,2001 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-6 located North of Rancho California Road, East of Margarita Road, and South of Honors Drive and within the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199, Temeku Hills Subdivision. PREPARED BY: ~'~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (~Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-6) BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 23371-6 was approved by the City Council on September 9, 1997. The owner dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes streets designated as lettered lots on the map. The owner also dedicated to public use 2.50-foot and 6.00 foot sidewalk and public utility easements. The City Clerk accepted the offers of dedication. Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. Therefore, the final one-year warranty bond was released. All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released. The public streets now being accepted by this action are Bogey Way, Links Court, and a portion of Margarita Road along the tract frontage. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. ATTACHMENT: 1. Resolution No. 2001- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. 2. Location Map 1 r:~agdrpt\.2001\0911\tr23371-6.acceptstreets RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-6) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, On September 9, 1997, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication for street and public utility purposes made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership on Tract Map No. 23371-6: and, WHEREAS, On September 9, 1997, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication for public use the 2.50-foot and 6.00 foot wide sidewalk and public utility easements made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership on Tract Map No. 23371-6: and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed: and, WHEREAS, All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released, including the final warranty bond: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City-Maintained-Street System that street and portion of street including sidewalk easements offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of September, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 2 r:~gdrpt\.2001\0911\tr23371-6,acceptstreets STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of September, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~agdrpt\.2001\0911\tr23371-6.acceptstreets EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2001- Accepting several of the public streets offered to and accepted bythe City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 23371-6 into the City-Maintained Street System as described below: Those portions of Tract Map No. 23371-6 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, as filed in Book 265, Pages 37-41 Inclusive, of Maps, in the Recorder's Office of said county, particularly described as follows: 1. Lot "A" (Portion of Margarita Road along the western tract boundary) of said Tract Map No. 23371-6 2. Lot "B" (Bogey Way) of said Tract Map No. 23371-6 3. Lot "C" (Links Court) of said Tract Map No. 23371-6 TOGETHER WITH The 2.50-foot and 6.00 foot wide sidewalk and public utility easements as shown on Tract Map No. 23371-6, 4 r:~agdrpt\.2001\0911\tr23371-6.acceptstreets VICId~I'Y kUbo Tract No. 23371-6 EXHIBIT "B" NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE. D~'Dle.,ATE~) A~ID TO ~. ~INTAIN~D UTILI~ Tract No. 23371-6 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE. ITEM 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA, CITY ATTORNEY Iff/ j''1, II DIRECTOR OF FINANC _/ u II CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council ~J~[Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 11,2001 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-7 located North of Honors Drive, East of Margarita Road, and South of the Metropolitan Water District Fee Right of Way and within the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199, Temeku Hills Subdivision. PREPARED BY: ~'//Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (~Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-7) BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 23371-7 was approved by the City Council on February 10, 1998. The owner dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes streets designated as lettered lots on the map. The owner also dedicated to public use 2.50-foot and 6.00 foot sidewalk and public utility easements. The City Clerk accepted the offers of dedication. Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. Therefore, the final one-year warranty bond was released. All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released. The public streets now being accepted by this action are Southern Hills Drive, Point Woods Court, Ashburn Road, and a portion of Margarita Road along part of the tract frontage. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. A'I-rACHMENT: 1. Resolution No. 2001- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. 2. Location Map 1 r:~agdrpt\.2001~0911\tr23371-7.acceptstreets RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-7) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, On February 10, 1998, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication for street and public utility purposes made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership on Tract Map No. 23371-7: and, WHEREAS, On February 10, 1998, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication for public use the 2.50-foot and 6.00 foot wide sidewalk and public utility easements made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership on Tract Map No. 23371-7: and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed: and, WHEREAS, All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released, including the final warranty bond: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City-Maintained-Street System that street and portion of street including sidewalk easements offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of September, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 2 r:~agdrpt\.2001~0911\tr23371-7.acceptstreets STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of September, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~agdrptL2001~0911\tr23371-7.acceptstreets EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2001- Accepting several of the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 23371-7 into the City-Maintained Street System as described below: Those portions of Tract Map No. 23371-7 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, as flied in Book 267, Pages 49-54 Inclusive, of Maps, in the Recorder's Office of said county, particularly described as follows: 1. Lot "A" (Portion of Margarita Road along part of the western tract boundary) of said Tract Map No. 23371-7 2. Lot "B" (Southern Hills Drive) of said Tract Map No. 23371-7 3. Lot "C" (Point Woods Court) of said Tract Map No. 23371-7 4. Lot "D" (Ashburn Road) of said Tract Map No. 23371-7 TOGETHER WITH The 2.50-foot and 6.00 foot wide sidewalk and public utility easements as shown on Tract Map No. 23371-7. 4 r:~agdrpt\.2001~0911\tr23371-7.acceptstreets TRACT 23371- 7 EXH I BIT "B" / / / 1 A5 O LE"TTEI~ED L-CT.S, ('$TI~.6~T$.) D~.~I C,A.T~D AN[3 ~ ~' /e,,C~I~F='TI~'~;) FF_./~.~H~NT$ DEDIr...AT~'D AND 3~ '51 ~ TEMECULA ~ TRACT 23371- 7 LOCATION MAP ?. 5 / / / / ~5 2% ~5 ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~j,,o/i./~ CITY ATTORNEY /~J/~//~'V~ II DIRECTOROFFINANC~_j~]~-- II CITY MANAGER f~ II CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~/~/(Nilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 11, 2001 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 24182-1 located North of State Highway 79 South, East of Campanula Way, South of DePortola Road, and West of Butterfield Stage Road and within the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219 in the Paseo Del Sol Subdivision. PREPARED BY:/z~_ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 24182-1) BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 24182-1 was approved by the City Council on May 12, 1998. The owner dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes streets designated as lettered lots on the map. The City Clerk accepted the offers of dedication. Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. However, the one-year Warranty Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond have not been released. The Warranty Bond will be released at the end of the one-year period on July 16, 2002. The Labor and Material Bond six months into the one-year warranty period on January 16, 2002. The Monument Bond has been released. The public streets now being accepted by this action are Pavia Way, Caserta Drive, Avola Court, Teramo Street, Charmes Court, Volterra Street, end portions of Campanula Way and De Portola Road along the tract frontage. FlSCALIMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. ATTACHMENT: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Vicinity Map with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. 1 r:~.gdrpt\.2001\0911\tr24182-1.acceptstreets RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 24182-1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, On May 12, 1998, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication for street and public utility purposes made by CaI-Paseo Del Sol, LLC, a California limited liability company on Tract Map No. 24182-1: and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed: and, WHEREAS, Only the Warranty Bond and Labor and Material Bond pertaining to this tract have not been released: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City-Maintained-Street System that street and portion of street offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of September, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 2 r:~agdrpt\.2001~0911\tr24182-1.acceptstreets STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resotution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of September, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~agdrpt~.2001~0911\tr24182-1,acceptstreets EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2001- Accepting several of the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 24182-1 into the City-Maintained Street System as described below: Those portions of Tract Map No. 24182-1 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, as filed in Book 271, Pages 22-31 Inclusive, of Maps, in the Recorder's Office of said county, particularly described as follows: 1. Lot "A" (Portion of De Portola Road along the northern tract boundary) of said Tract Map No. 24182-1 2. Lot "B" (Portion of Campanula Way along the western tract boundary) of said Tract Map No. 24182-1 3. Lot "C" (Pavia Way) of said Tract Map No. 24182-1 4. Lot "D" (Caserta Drive) of said Tract Map No. 24182-1 5. Lot "E" (Avola Court) of said Tract Map No. 24182-1 6. Lot "F" (Teramo Street) of said Tract Map No. 24182-1 7. Lot "G" (Charmes Court) of said Tract Map No. 24182-1 8. Lot "H" (Volterra Street) of said Tract Map No. 24182-1 4 r:~agdrpt\.2001\0911\tr24182-1.acceptstreets TO CORONA City ,ecula TRACT NO. 24182-1 TO SAN DIEGO VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE EX/d/B/f' "B· T,~A C T AIO. Z41$Z- I (R=1205.00' (L= 19 20 21 22 23 COMMON OPEN SPACE N~EA 96 58 ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ II DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.~_.~_ II CITY MANAGER City Manager/City Council /~l,~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 11, 2001 Parcel Map No. 30208, Located on North West Corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer- Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 30208 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the bond 3) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Manument Bond as security for the agreement. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 30208 is a twenty three (23) parcels subdivision located on the north west corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road. The street improvements associated with this map except the raised landscaped medians are in place. The improvements were completed as part of the City's Capital Improvement Projects. On August 23, 2001, the Planning Director for the City of Temecula approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 30208, with the appropriate condition of approvals. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Parcel Map No. 30208 r:\agdrpt~2001\091 l\pm30208.map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. PM 30208 Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Flood Control (ADP) Development Impact Fee CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL To Be Paid To Be Paid r:\agdrpt~001\091 l\pm30208.map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 30044 DATE: September 11, 2001 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 24,000 $ 12,000 Water $ 0 $ 0 Sewer $ 0 $ 0 TOTAL $ 24,000 $ 0 Monument $ 8,500 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00 $ To Be Paid $ To Be Paid $ 77.00 $ 4.00 $ 1,210.00 $ 425.00 $ 1,716.00 $ o.oo 3 r:~agdrpt~2001\091 l\pm30208.map i % I$1$1't,lSB'l,l$'l,l$1,1q*l*l,l*l I,I,ISl Iq I,~1,1 I,I I,Iq 1,1, fl IJ ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOROFFINANC~ CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council ./~J,~/illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 11,2001 Authorize Temporary Street Closu res for Temeoula Fall Rod Run 2001 Event in Old Town. (Old Town Front Street, between Moreno Road and Second Street, and other related streets) PREPARED BY: ..~' Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ~/ Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN 2001 EVENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT BACKGROUND: The Annual Fall Rod Run necessitates the physical closure of certain streets in the Old Town area, and related detouring, to accommodate and provide the "Street Scene" ambience that allows the free movement of pedestrian traffic by minimizing potential vehicular- pedestrian conflicts. Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing". The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way. While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was provided for delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these special events. 1 r:~agdrpt~001\091 l\fallrodrunclosure The recommended resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the Temecula Fall Rod Run 2001 Event sponsored by the Drifters Car Club and P & R Productions. This authority is limited to and delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject to the approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council. These rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101. This year's Fall Rod Run Event sponsors propose street closures as follows: Old Town Front Street between Moreno Road (E) to Second Street from 3:00 pm to 9:00 pm on Friday September 28th, 2001, and from 6:00 am to 5:00 pm on Saturday, September 29th, 2001. Access is provided to handicap parking lots located at Sixth Street and Mercedes Street and at First Street and Old Town Front Street. Show car parking will be at designated parking lots and along both sides of Old Town Front Street as shown on the attached Location Map. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated costs for the Public Works Department Maintenance Division support is estimated at $3,800.00. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 001-164-601-5402. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Location Map 2 r:~agdrpt~2001\091 l\fallrodrunclosure RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN 2001 EVENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecuta desires to authorize the closure of public streets for the Temecula Fall Rod Run 2001 Event sponsored by the Drifters Car Club and P & R Productions, for which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those streets for the special event: and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily close public streets for the Temecula Fall Rod Run 2001 Event; and, NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve temporary street closures for the Temecula Fall Rod Run 2001 Event sponsored by the Drifters Car Club and P & R Productions, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the Temecula Fall Rod Run 2001 Event, and establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be approved or denied approval by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of September 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W.Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~agdrpt~2001~091 l\fallrodrunclosure [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CiTY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of September 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: 4 r:~agdrpt~001~91 l~allrodrunclosure ITEM 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~.,E ~J,~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Grant Yates, Assistant to the City Manager September 11, 2001 Clean Cities Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Renewal PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) renewal between the City of Temecula and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) regarding the participation in the Clean Cities Program BACKGROUND: In June of 1995, the City entered a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for the CLean Cities Program. The single most significant factor that determines the success of Clean Cities is the number of alternative fueled vehicles (AFVs) and alternative fuel (AF) refueling sites in the Clean Cities. This MOU was valid for 5 years which during this renewal process, now allows the City to re-evaluate the role and capability of our City. The MOU between the City of Temecula and SCAG represents a good faith effort to support and promote cleaner cities through the utilization of zero emission vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles. This MOU does not create any contractual rights or obligations and is intended to raise the awareness and importance of alternative fuel vehicles and sites and provide education about technology of dean fuel vehicles. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN THE CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the counties of Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial, Ventura, Orange, and Los Angeles and 184 cities ~thin these counties; and WHEREAS, the cities and counties within the jurisdiction of SCAG are also located in the South Coast Air Basin, Southeast Desert Air Basin, and the South Central Air Basin (Ventura County); and WHEREAS, the South Coast Air Basin is the only area in the nation in the "extreme" category for non-attainment based on the o;~ne concentration; and WHEREAS, both South Central Air Basin and Southeast Desert Air Basin are in the "severe" category for non-attainment for ozone non-attainment; and WHEREAS, the respective State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittals for these air basins contain transportation control measures (TCM) designed to improve the region's air quality and thus brin9 the region into compliance ~th state and federal air quality standards; and WHEREAS, the TCMs contained in the SIP submittals for the three air basins promote, inter alia, the development of zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) and alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs); and WHEREAS, the California Air Resources Board has promulgated regulations pertaining to ZEVs and AFVs; and WHEREAS, the Energy Chapter of the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan recommends implementing the development of alternative fuels, AFVs and ZEVs; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to energy use in the transportation sector that is safer, more environmentally sound, efficient, and sustainable, and which is less dependent on foreign energy sources; and WHEREAS, the 1900 Clean Air Act Amendments, the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and Executive Order 12844 (concerning Federal use of AFVs) all establish guidelines for effecting a favorable energy and environmental situation in the transportation sector; and WHEREAS, the 1994 SCAG Regional Mobility Plan contains an Advanced Transportation Technology Strategy that includes AFVs and ZEVs and support for the Southern California Economic Partnership, a public/private organization, to develop early deployment plans for these technologies; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 5, 1994, the SCAG Regional Council approved a request to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy to designate SCAG as a member of the Clean Cities Program; and Resos\99-40 I NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, that the City of Temecula will participate in the SCAG Clean Cities Program in the interest of 1. Reducing the national dependence on imported petroleum for transportation uses, as specified in the Energy Policy Act of 1992; 2. Complying with the Alternative Fuel Fleet provisions of the Federal Policy Act of 1002; 3. Assisting the region to comply with Alternative Fuel Fleet provision of Title II of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the California Clean Air Act, and local Air Quality District regulations as SCAG region is considered to be a non-attainment area; 4. Educating the public on alternative fuels and available vehicles, which encourage their use; 5. Assisting to stimulate the economic vitality of the region and California by encouraging the utilization of emerging advanced transportation technologies; and 6. Encouraging the development of a market driven and sustained public alternative fuel infrastructure. The undersigned agencies and entities enter into this voluntary Memorandum of Understanding in order to: 1. Join in a coordinated effort to promote and accommodate the acquisition and use of alternative fuel vehicles, change local and state laws to facilitate alternative fuel vehicles and infrastructure, and establish necessary refueling sites and servicing facilities; 2. Provide assistance in the collection and analysis of environmental, economic, and performance data on alternative fuel vehicle use and experience, and distribution of information regarding alternative fuels and vehicles; 3. Work with SCAG and public private organizations such as the Southern California Economic Partnership to encourage engine manufacturers and alternative fuel producers to develop vehicles and infrastructures that meet local and regional needs; and 4. Develop applications for funding or services from the state and federal governments or other appropriate sources to sustain the objectives of the program. This Memorandum of Understanding may be amended by mutual agreement between DOE and signatories or may be terminated by mutual agreement. Signatories may terminate individual participation upon a 30-day written notice. This Memorandum of Understanding is not intended to and does not create any contractual rights and obligations with respect to the signatories or any other parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF, this MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING has been executed on the day and year first written above and shall remain in effect for a period of five years, affer which the Memorandum of Understanding becomes eligible for renewal. Resos\99-40 2 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS CITY OF TEMECULA By: Mark Pisano Executive Director, SCAG Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Date Date ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] Resos\99-40 3 ITEM 13 APPROVAL CITY A~-ORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~.~,~) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager/5 September 11,2001 Comment Letter on the Riverside County Circulation Element PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Approve the comment letter for transmittal to the Riverside County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors BACKGROUND: Various elements of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) are now available for review. One of the elements that has generated much interest is the Draft Circulation Element. City staff has reviewed the draft policies of the Circulation Element and prepared the attached letter for your review and approval. The Draft Circulation Element will be recirculated for the City's further review with the entire General Plan document sometime in 2002. We would like to caution you that the Draft Circulation Element will be part of the County's General Plan and should not be confused with the CETAP Temecula Corridor EIR/EIS. Although the two documents deal with some of the same subjects, they are different entities. We will bring a comment letter on the CETAP EIR/EIS for your approval in the near future. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct impacts, but if the proposed circulation policies are adopted by the County, the City will face undetermined costs to rectify traffic congestion within the City boundaries. ATTACHMENTS: City of Temecula Comment Letter Draft Circulation Element Comment letters from other reviewers R:\BROWNS\R C I P\Circulation Element CC Stafrpt-9-11-01 .doc 1 Comment letter QCity of Teme cula 43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - Temecula - California - 92589-9033 (909) 694-6400 - FAX (909) 694-6477 September 11, 2001 Cathy Bechtel Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Comments on Draft Circulation Element Dear Ms. Bechtel: The City of Temecula appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Draft Circulation Element of the General Plan. The City has been closely monitoring development and transportation issues within the southwest County for the past several years and it is our hope that the new Integrated Plan will address many of the concerns we have raised with the County of Riverside. We present the following comments for your consideration: Policy C 1.7 The first sentence in this policy may not have been edited and may need some clarification. We would like to offer the following as a possible replacement. "An additional easement of up to 25' shall be dedicated along both sided of roadways designated as Transportation Corridors." C 1.8 We appreciate that the County is concerned about the impact of the cities on the circulation system in the unincorporated territory. Temecula has been vigilant on our impacts to surrounding jurisdictions and feel this policy should be modified to include the County's impacts on cities too. C 1.11 We are concerned with the statement within this policy that implementation of the circulation system needs to be "...consistent with financing capabilities." We are concerned that financing limits may somehow hinder the completion of the necessary traffic improvements as expressed by this policy. This section needs to be rewritten to insure that the Land Use Element will not lead to excessive traffic while the circulation system languishes because of funding constraints. C 2.1 The City feels this is a bad policy and the current SWAP standards need to be kept in place or strengthened. The adoption of this policy will lead to more congestion on County and City streets. R:\BROWNS\R C [ P\CETAP Draft response 8-30-01X2.doc C 2.5 We feel that the Circulation Element should also anticipate working with the High Speed Rail Authority. C 2.6 Relative to annexations, what would be considered short or intermediate time frames? C2.8 We have several thoughts on this section: · The first paragraph states that a traffic analysis must be prepared for the project plus those projects "already allowed in the area." We feel that a competent analysis should also include other projects that are concurrent in the planning process too. · To limit the study for the "build out" scenario may not be in the best interest of the County and cities. There may be instances where large projects might need certain key infrastructure improvements prior to build out. Large projects should have short and intermediate impacts studied as well as the build out stage. · The concept purported in the second paragraph is dangerous and is possibly a violation of CEQA. This paragraph should be completely eliminated. · The third paragraph is also dangerous. Approving projects with "overriding benefits" may have serious negative consequences for local cities. Such a policy should require approval by all adjacent cities so they can concur in the perceived "benefit". C 2.36 This policy must set a realistic time to complete the process. We note it took many years for the County to complete the regional traffic study that was required as a matter of policy by the SWAP. C 5.1 This policy needs to be strengthened as illustrated by the Supervisor's actions on land uses surrounding the French Valley Airport. C6.1 Add in addition to railroad right-of-way "or other utilities" If you have any questions regarding our comment please contact me at City Hall so I may direct you to the appropriate department head to answer your questions. Sincerely, Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Cc~ Shawn Nelson, City Manager Temecula City Council Temecula Planning Commission Riverside County Board of Supervisors Riverside County Planning Commission Richard Lashbrook, Director, TLMA Rick Bishop, WRCOG Executive Director R:\BROWNS\R C 1 P~CETAP Draft response 8-30-01X2.doc 2 Riverside County Draft Circulation Element ' County of Riverside General Plan - Draft .. Circulation Element ~ '~" Introduction BACKGROUND The CirculaTion Element outlines the necessary multi-modal transportation system components and provides tools, such as the policies and the Circulation Plan to assist with development anal implementation of the transportation system needed for the future. The Circulation Element is structured to enable the effective implementation of the. policies and represents both the functional and locational criteria desired by citizens and decision makers to provide transportation mobility and quality access to existing and future residential, recreation, and economic uses as defined in the Land Use Element. The policies listed below have been developed considering the Vision Statement, which describe how residents foresee the transportation system in Riverside County by theyear 2020. The vision statements not only addresses the types of development that are foreseen, but also how the planned infrastructure, including the transportation system, addresses future mobility needs resulting from the planned growth and development. The Vision Statement below is phrased in a way that loolc~ back from the future or from the year 2020. The Vision Statement says: "The transportation system in Riverside County has more than kept pace with the growth, in population, employment and tourism and the demands for mobility. New and expanded transportation corridors are planned that connect growth centers at key locations throughout the County. In fact, several corridors will have built-in transit service and expansion capability to accommodate various forms of transit. Some of these corridors are now providing express bus service to MetroLink stations. It will be critical to design the corridors with a high regard for the environment, including provision of critical wildlife corridor crossings ~ r~ sothat~ur open spaces can sustain habitat value". Issues aha l-'OllCleS verside General PLan - Draft The policies contained in this Chapter reflect the desires of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors regarding the planned circulation system. During the outreach meetings, preparation of the Existing Conditions section of the Circulation Element, and considenng the transportation objectives referenced in the Vision Statement for the Riverside County. Integrated Plan (RCIP), several key policy issues were identified including: Street and highway Minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards, a viable and effective public transportation system, the implementation and maintenance of recreation trails, the need for consistent County/City Street and Highway Design Standards, and land use planning and transportation system integration. These key issues have been fully considered and have been incorporated into the Policies included in this Section. System-Level Directives The overlying intent of the General Plan iRCIP Vision Circulation Element is to establish a comprehensive multi-modal transportation system New gror~h pellems no longer reltect e pe~ern o~at is safe, achievable, efficient, environmentally and financially sound, accessible, and coordinated randomsprea4. Rather, ~eyfollowefrernewor~o~ith the Land Use Element. It is important to transportation and open spece corridors, withdesign and implement a multi-modal transportation concentrations of development that fit into ~etsvstem that will serve projected future travel framework tn other words, ~mportant open sp~ demand, minimize congestion, achieve the shortest and transportetion conldors define pro}gib areas. . · feasible travel times and d stances, and address GrowO~ focus in Iris Court, is on gueti~, nol onfuture growth and development in the Count3'. frustrating etfo~ to hell growth. In addition to planning for specific modes of Poputstion grov~ conlinues and is f~cused wheretransportation that will serve the needs of existing il can besl he t~ccornmodal~.and future residents, integration of advanced transportation technologies is also important. ~he Growth is well coordinated between clues and thense of new technologies [Intelligent Transpo~Uen County endtheYj°infiYinfirT;~;;;~;~; ~;;~Systcms (ITS)] will allow maximum use of the ............ ., ,,~..~.transportation infrastructure including streets and ~ ~highways and transit. Further, the need for traveler informal on is critical in order to lessen the unp~cB · of accidents and other special events in the regl°n. .RCIP ~smn . . . ' Real-time traveler information can make travehng Riverside County more enjoyable and reduce delay and congestion. One of the most important considerations to achieve a viable multi-modal transportation system is financing. Funding priorities must be developed and innovative financing must be designed to ensure that the transportation system is implemented over the next 20 years. Policies: Page County of Riverside General Plan - Draft Orculat~on Element Despite differences in pdotfties and approaches, we are engaged in community building for ourselves and our heirs based on the common ground we have forged Cl.1 C 1.2 C 1.3 C 1.4 C t.5 C 1.6 Design the transportation system in a manner that responds to concentrations of population and employment activities in nodal areas designated by the Land Use Element. Support development of a variety of transportation option available to major employment and activity centers including direct access to express transit routes, primary arterial highways, bikeways, park-n-ride facilities, and podesb-ian facihties. Consider the integration of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) consistent with principles and recommendations referenced in the Inland Empire ITS Strategic Plan during implementation of the transportation system. Equitably distribute the costs of transportation system improvements. New development shall pay a fair share of the costs for providing local and regional transportation system improvements necessary, to serve current and new development. Utilize existing infi-astmcture and public services to the maximum extent and provide for the logical, timely and economically efficient extension of infrastructure and services. C 1.7 Dedicate an additional easement of up to 25' shall be dedicated along both sides of roadways designated as Transportation Corridors. Such easements shall be reserved for future transportation system improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: provisions for express transit services, fixed gnideway systems, and/or auxiliary lanes. Until needed for such improvements, such easements may be utilized, under permit, for additional parking and/or landscaping. C 1.8 Work with the incorporated cities to mitigate the cumulative impacts of incorporated and unincorporated development on the Countywide transportation system. Use annexations, redevelopment agreements, revenue sharing agreements, tax allocation agreements and the CEQA process as tools to ensure that development within the cities pays its fair share toward mitigating traffic impacts in the unincorporated portions of the County. C 1.9 Use the County's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to establish improvement priorities and scheduling for transportation project C I. 10 Implement the General Plan circulation system as shown in the Circulation Plan Map, Figure XX. Provision of a street and highway network that supports and is consistent with Land Use Element policies of the County is an overlying desire of Riverside County. The County must establish a network that supports the travel needs of existing and future development designated in the Land Use Element. Policies: 'ivers de Generat Plan - Braft ,,.,', C1.11 Implement the circulation plan in a manner that supports the tmplementation of adopted General Plan Land Use map and land use policies and that are consistent with financing capabilities. Streets and Highways A well-planned and designed street and highway system facilitates the movement of vehicles and provides safe and convenient access to surrounding development. Riverside County's past efforts to develop a system of local, collector and arterial highways and roads has provided the basis for a safe, efficient roadway system. Arterial roads have been built with sufficient capacity to accommodate long-term traffic growth. In addition, driveway access has been limited to promote safe and efficient operations. Through this Element, the County will continue to provide a system of highways and roads that meets the needs of current and future residents. This can be accomplished through development of a functional classification system for major highways, set nfinimum fights-of-my and design standards, and the identification of needed rmdway hnprovcmcnts. In addition, thc road system must be based upon and consistent with the Land Use Element resulting in a highway and road system that has adequate capacity and acceptable levels of service to accommodate projected travel demand. Finally, roadway improvement funds should be allocated to enhance mobility and promote convenient, safe and efficient transport of people, goods and materials. Level of Service Riverside County must provide and maintain a highway system with adequate capacity and acceptable levels of service to accommodate projected travel demands for the 20-year planning period. This can be accomplished by maintaining a "D' Level of Service (LOS) or better along the designated street and highway system Strategies that result in improvements to the transportation system, coupled with local job creation, will allow County residents to have access to a wide range of job opportunities within reasonable commute times. Policies: C2.1 The County has estabhshed, as Cottntr3n'dde target within commumty developmem areas, a Level of Service "D' along all County maintained roads and conventional Stale Highways except that LOS "E' may be allowed in urban areas only at intersectiom of any combination of Major Streets, Arterials, Urban Arterials, Expressways, or conventional State Highways ~nSthin one mile of a freeway imerchange and also al freeway ramp imersections. LOS "E' would only be allowed, subject to Board of Supervisor approval, in those instances where mitigation of LOS "D' is deemed to be impractical or in designated commumty cemers "by right". Outside community Development Areas, the level of service target is "C~ along all county maintained roads and conventional State Highways except thai LOS ~D' may be allowed in urban areas only al intersections of any combination of Major Street$, Arterials, Urban Paterials, Expressways, or conventional State Highways within one mile of a freeway interchange and also at freeway ramp intersections. Area Plan policies could either be more or less restrictive depending upon the adopted Area Plan. C 2.2 Maimain the existing transportation networl~ while prodding for future County of Riverside General Plan - Draft Circulation Element expansion and improvement based on travel demand, and the developmem of altemanve travel modes. Local Agency Coordination The County has the desire to provide a cimulation (arterial highway) plan that is integrated with that of adjacent jurisdictions. To accomplish this goal, the County musl maintain a high level ofinter-goverranental coordination and citizen participation in the circulation and transportation planning process and work with other agencies to assure that regional transportation plans are eousistent with the County's General Plar~ The County recognizes that the land use/transportation connection is a k~' part of the development process and that it will serve to reduce the number of vehicle trips compared to earlier patterns of development. C 2.4 Incorporale as part of the (Tn-culation Elemenl: the Regional Transponalion Plan, the Riverside County Congestion Managemem Program, the 'Expenditure Plan for Measure 'A' and the Riverside CountyShort- and Long- Range Transit Plans. C2.5 Coordinate with planning agencies such as Caltrans, RCTC, WRCOG, and the dries on various studies relating to freeway, High Occupancy Vehicle/High Occupancy Toll Lanes (HOV/HOT), and transportation corridor planning, construction, and improvement in order to facilitate the plannmg and implementation of an integrated cimflafion system. C2.6 The County Transportation Department will work with all incorporated cities and all adjacent counties to coordinate right-of-way requirements and improvement standards for General Plan roads which cross jurisdictional boundaries. Detailed procedures have been developed and include the following: For development under the County jurisdiction outside of a city's boundaries, but within the Sphere of Influence (SOl) of a city having roadway standards different from the County, City and County staff will cooperate and agree on a reasonable choice of design standards for the particular circumstances involved, and negotiate logical transitions from City to County Standards. In general, for such development under County jurisdiction but within the SOI of an incorporated jurisdiction, City Standards should apply if the staffs concur that annexation to the City will logically occur in the short to intermediate range future. Where annexation seems doubtful into the long-term future, County Standards should apply. Transition areas at meeting points of roadways designed to differing City and County Standards or differing functional classifications should be individually designed to facilitate satisfactory operational and safety, performance. Further, the County should update the Road Standards to reflect the intent of this policy and standards agreed upon by the County and other local agencies. 'iverside General Plan Draft System Design, Construction and Maintenance The County's street and highway system must be planned, designed, constructed, operated, · . . implemented, and maintained in a manner that tncenttves and the competiSve need to ratee thebaY, increetingcommunitJeao~Up~.o.~ts the economy and maintains persona] exceJlence commonly s~irnulate themObthty' and promotes safety, convenience, and developmentcornmunitytoexceedtheefficiency. The County's roadway network must notmsofdevelopmentstandardsalso be consistent and u~fotm t~'oughout the ~l~County. To accomplish this, the County should establish a ~notiounl c]assi~cation system for - RClP ~sionmaj°r highways, with set minimum rial. t-of-way and design standards, and identify needed roadway improvements. Policies: C 2.7 County roadways shall be designed, constructed, and maintained as specified in Ordinance No. 461, Count3, Road Improvement Standards and Specifications. C2.8 Projects that propose an increase in currently approved density and intensity of land use, must prepare a traffic analysis that evaluates the long-term impacts of the project, demonstrating that the planned road system can support the proposed project, together with those land uses already allowed in the area. The analysis would project average daily traffic of roadway link~ for the buildout situation of the entire area to demonstrate conformance with the target Level of Service standards. In addition, any individual development proposal may be required to provide a traffic analysis to assess peak hour impacts at affected intersections, identifying needed mitigation measures to achieve or maintain the target Level of Service. A traffic study may not be necessary in ever3, situation, such as when the project area is 'known to have existing deficiencies or the size of the project will not have a significant impact upon and will not change the ex/sting Level of Service. Also, certain types of projects, due to the trip generation characteristics, may add virtually no traffic to the peak hour traffic volumes. These types of prO.lects may be exempt from the traffic study requirements. Whether a particular project qualifies for an exemption will be determined by the Transportation Department. Projects that have substantial traffic impacts may have overriding benefits that would be desirable even though the Level of Service Standards cannot be met. Examples might be projects that provide jobs in a local area to aid in meeting regional air quality and mobility goals, projects that serve to provide needed transportation improvements that would not otherwise be constructed, or projects that provide some unique benefit to the County, which would outweigh the traffic impacts. Projects that may qualify as having ovemding benefits would be required to analyze traffic impacts and mitigate such impacts to the extent that it is economically feasible as determined by the Board of Supervisors. Proponents of these types of projects shall be required to provide a value engineering analysis in order to determine the level of improvements that would be considered economically feasible. County of Riverside General Plan - Oraft Circulation Element C 2.9 Special event uses should not be evaluated by the same criteria as ~pical traffic generators because the traffic panems for these uses are not typical and traffic trips are usually not at peak hours (e.g., stadium events, etc.). A traffic management plan will be required for these uses in order to manage traffic. Also, a traffic management plan must include traffic control measures needed to serve major events at the site. Adequate circulation must exist for these types of development and alt impacts must be alleviated to the maximum level possible. C2.10 Any project that would exceed the target Level of Service, based on the traffic analysis, would be required to mitigate the traffic impacts to bring the Level of Service to the target level. Such impacts may be mitigated by construction of all improvements necessary to achieve the target Level of Service, by payment of a fee or fees if an appropriate funding mechanism is in place, or by any other appropriate means. If the projected traffic does not exceed the target level, mitigation may include, but not limited to, compliance with standard conditions of approval, or the construction of improvements or payment of fees necessary to mitigate the incremental impact for each development proposal. 2.11 Implement design guidelines that identify intersection improvements consistent with the followin[g lane [~eometrics: mottwAr LANE REQUIREMENTS I Classification # of Through Intersection Turn Lanes Lanes Along Required for intersection Arterial ~v/secondary highway and above Segment Left Right Expressway 6 2 2 Urban Arterial 6 2 1 Allerial Highway 4 or 6* 2 1 Major Highway 4 2 1 Seconda~, Hi[thway 4 I 1 Collector Highways 2 N/A N/A Six lanes may be required for designated arterial highways as indicated a lisim maintained by TLMA C 2.12 Roundabouts or other innovative design solutions may be allowed when a thorough traffic impact assessment has been conducted demonstrating that such an intersection design altemative would improve traffic flow such safety and is physically and economically feasible. C 2.13 Design a comprehensive, efficient collector road system in developing areas. C 2.14 All major subdivisions shall be required to provide adequate collector road networks designed to feed traffic onto general planned highways. C 2.15 Improvement of streets and highways serving as access to developing commercial, industrial and residential areas shall primarily be the responsibility of the private developer. These may include road consmmtinn or widening, installation of turning lanes and traffic signals, and the iverside General Plan Draft C2.16 C2.17 C2.18 C2.19 C 2.20 C2.21 C 2.22 C 2.23 C 2.24 C 2.25 C 2.26 C 2.27 C 2.28 improvement of any drainage facili~' or other auxiliary facility necessary for the safe and efficient movement of traffic or the protection of road facilities. Interior collector street systems for commercial and industrial subdivisions shall be designed to accommodate the movement of heavy trucks. Restrict heavy duty trucks in residential and town center areas. Off-street loading facilities that do not face surrounding roadways or residential neighborhoods for all new commercial and industrial developments shall be required. Private and public land developments shall be required to provide all on-site auxiliary facility Xmprovements necessary to mitigate any developmem generated circulation impacts. A review of each proposed land development project shall be undertaken to identify project nnpaets to the circulation system and its auxiliary facilities. The Transportation Department may require developers and/or subdividers to provide traffic impact studies prepared by qualified professionals to identify the unpacts of a development. Arterial highways shall be identified on a map and improved as area development and highway needs warrant. Whenever possible, improvements shall be made with financing mechanisms that equally-distribute the cost of road improvements among those who will benefit. Highways serving as Arterials through mountainous and rural areas shall be improved to adequately meet travel demands, while minimizing the need for excessive cut and fill. All street intersections shall be designed to assure the safe, efficient passage of through traffic and the negotiation of mroing movements. Curves and grades shall be designed to permit safe movement of vehicular traffic at the road's design speed. Design speed should be consistent with and compliment character of the adjacent area. Sight distances shall be adequate to provide for safe vehicular movement at a road's design speed and at all intersections. Necessary rights-of-way dedications shall be made by developers and land dividers as part of the land division and land use review processes. Rights-of-way dedications shall be aligned to match up with existing dedications along adjacent parcels and shall be ora width consistent within the ultimate design standard of the road. Dedications outside the road rights-of-way may be necessary to establish slope stability or drainage structures. These dedications shall be made by land dividers or developers during the land division and land use review process to the responsible agency. C2.29 Road rights-of-way and improvements shall be primarily determined by land County of Riverside General Plan Draft Circulation Element use and travel demand. C2.30 Land divisions involving parcels greater than 20 acres in size and designated as agriculture on the General Plan Land Use Map shall be considered for a reduction in improvement requirements. C2.31 Through traffic movements shall be limited to general plan roads and shall avoid streets through residential neighborhoods. Provisions shall be made for highways capable of carrying high volumes of through traffic between major trip generators. C 2.32 Traffic calming techniques should be considered in the design of new community local street and road systems and within existing communities where such techniques will improve safety and traffic flow through sensitive neighborhoods. C 2.33 The street network should provide a quick and efficient route for emergency vehicles, meeting required street width, mm around radii and other factors as specified by the Fire Department. C 2.34 On-street parking shall be restricted, when necessary, to reduce traffic congestion. System Financing Discretionmy roadway improvement funds should be allocated to enhance mobility and promote convenient, safe and efficient transport of people, goods and materials. This can be accomplished through continued development of a "Transportation Improvement Program" of road and bridge improvements. Investment in and expansion of the existing freeway and arterial street network is critical to the provision of a viable transportation system necessary to sustain a healthy level economy. Innovative options such as the application of "Toll-way fares" should continue to be explored as a means of controlling demand in critical corr/dors. Riverside County must consider these and other innovative funding mechanisms to ensure that the future transportation s3,stem is financially supported and can be adequately maintained. Policies: C 2.35 The County Transportation Department shall annually prepare a Transportation Improvement Program, which lists all projects scheduled fo,' improvement during the next 5 to 7 years. This program is a multi-year program, reviewed and updated annually. C 2.36 The County shall participate in the establishment of regional traffic mitigation fees and/or road and bridge benefits districts to be assessed on new development. The fees shall cover a reasonable share of the costs of providing local and subregional transportation improvements needed for serving new development in the unincorporated area. Local improvements are defined as those improvements to streets within the impact area of new development. C2.37 Encourage the use of road improvement financing mechanisms, with the cost of road improvements among those who benefit from the road improvements. 'iverside General Plan raft C 2.38 Review and update the County fee structure for development impact fees annually to provide an ongoing mechanism to ensure that projects are developed and constructed in a timely manner. System Access Access to the County's street and highway system must be designed, constructed, operated, implemented, and maintained in a manner that supports the economy and maintains personal mobility, and promotes safety, convenience, and efficiency. Further, access to the County's roadway network must be consistent and uniform. Policies: C 2.39 Dedicated and recorded public access shall be provided to all parcels of land, except as provided for under the statutes of the State of California. C 2.40 All weather access shall be provided to all developed areas. C 2.41 Access points and intersections of streets and highways shall be limited based upon the road's classification and function. C 2.42 Parcel access points taken directly off general planned highways shall be discouraged. C 2.43 Access may be permitted off general planned highways only if no local streets are present. C 2.44 Whenever access must be taken directly off a General Planned Highway, common access shall be provided via shared driveways end/or reciprocal access easements. Parcels on opposite sides of a highway shall have access points located directly opposite each other, whenever possible, to allow for future street intersections and increased safety. Public Transportation System General Riverside Count), understands the need to promote development of a safe, efficient, convenient and economical community, intercommunity and countywide public transportation system. In addition, it is important to encourage increased ridership on public transit systems and increased use of alternative modes, including bicycles and walking. The Land Use Element describes the critical nature of the patterns and densities of development for a successful public transportation system. To accomplish this goal, the County supports reliable, efficient, and effective paratransit service throughout the County, by encouraging development of service that satisfies transit needs of the elderly and physically handicapped. Further, the County continues to support fixed-route, scheduled bus services, which will have convenient access to ma!o[ population, economic, institutional, recreation centers, community centers end activity centers. Policies: County of Riverside. Generat Ptan Oraft Cir¢ Zatio. me,,e.t C3.1 The Count3,, through the Riverside Count3.' Transportation Commission (RCTC) and development of the Short- and Long-Range Transit Plans, should identify short- and long-range transit needs and maxiXmZe revenue sources utilizing all funding mechamsms including federal grants, state enabling legislation, and farebox revenue. C 3.2 Support transit operator's programs to foster transit usage. C 3.3 Utilize community centers and concentrated development areas in the future land use patterns to facilitate multimedal transportation Paratransit Service C 3.4 Support programs of transit agencies/operators to provide paratransit service. Fixed Route Transit Service C 3.5 Reserve fight-of-way for designated transit service. C 3.6 Developments that are identified as major trip attractions (i.e. community centers, commercial and employment centers) shall incorporate the potential for public transit service in their design, as indicated in Ordinance No. 460, Regulating the Division of Land of the County of Riverside. C3.7 C3.8 C 3.9 C3.10 Support the coordination of express and local bus routes by establishing a series of transit centers or transfer sites and supportive park- and-ride lots in Riverside County. Transit centers should be located: 1) maximize the use of conventional public transit, 2) provide adequate off- street parking for community centers and activit3' centers, 3) provide convenient pedestrian access from community or activity centers, and 4) avoid arterials with heavy traffic and congestion. Transit centers should be designed to enhance public convenience and provide mulit-modal connections to the community. Accommodate the transit corridors and ancillary facilities (including transit stations for rail and bus operations) identified through the Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) and the Riverside County Integrated Project CRCIP) planning process along the transit spine network. Design the physical layout and geometries of arterial and collector highways to facilitate bus operations. Offer incentives to new development if they locale in transit-oriented areas such as in community centers or along designated transit comdors near stations and also accommodate transit through higher densities, innovative design, and right-of-w~ay dedication. 'iverside General Plan Oraft Rail System The freight and passenger rail systems in Riverside County are vital to the mobili .fy and economy of the region. Riverside County will continue to support operation of passenger and freight rail systems that offer efficient, safe, convenient and econ°rmcal transport of County residents and commodities. The proposed California high-speed rail system will directly serve residents and businesses in Riverside County, enabling the County to compete in the global economy. The County will also continue to encourage rail passenger improvements and the efficient movement of goods by rail- through development of efficient intermodal freight facilities and a shift of a portion of the goods previously moved by trucks onto the rail freight system. Further, every effort will be made to reduce conflicts between rail and other modes of transportation (particularly the highway system). Riverside County will thoroughly consider issues surrounding the abandonment of rail lines so that the lines are preserved for other transportation uses. Policies: C4.1 Support continued development and implementation of the Measure A Rail Program including new rail lines and stations, the proposed California High Speed Rail System with at least two (2) stations in Riverside County, and the proposed Intercity Rail Corridor between Calexico and Los Angeles. C 4.2 Support continued improvements to AMTRAK and MetroLink rail passenger service within Riverside County. and throughout the Southern California Region. C 4.3 Support implementation of the San Jacinto Branch Line to accommodate planned industrial development. C 4.4 Improve or reconstraet existing grade separations as necessary for the smooth flow of traffic wi thin the Count3., consistent with plans developed by WRCOG and CVAG. C 4.5 Provide additional grade crossing improvements as determined by the California Public Utilities Commission and the County. C4.6 Reserve the future use of rail right-of-way for alternative transportation purposes in cooperation with corridor communities so that an integrated and mutually supportive set of transportation projects may be defined for Riverside County. C 4.7 Alternatives for intermodal shipment should be addressed for industries affected by abandonment of rail facilities. C 4.8 Locate future transit stops in community centers and/or major activity areas (high concentrations of employment and residential uses). County of Riverside Generat Ptan - Draft Circulation Element ~Jtports sewing the County are tied into the regional air transportation system and operate as an efficient end convenient transportation mode to accommodate the traveling needs of the people and move selected goods quickly in the highly competitive intema§onal mefl~etplace .RClP Vision Aviation System The provision of general aviation facilities and services that meet the needs of the residents of Riverside County is an important component of the County's transportation system To meet these needs, the County must facilitate coordination of County airport plans with aviation planning conducted by the State, the County Economic Development Agency, and local agencies related to transportation, land use and financing, It will also be important for the County to continue to provide civilian airport facilities for general aviation and emergency purposes and to protect airports from encroachment of future development within areas that would be subject to extreme noise from aircra~ as defined in the Noise Element. Airports used by County residents and businesses are tied into the regional air transportation system. These airports must continue to operate efficiently and provide convenient transportation to accommodate future traveling needs and the movement of goods. In addition, the County should coordinate with transit agencies to provide connections to pass Policies: C 5. l Ensure the development of appropriate land uses near County airports, as specified in the Riverside County Airport Lend Use Plan. C 5.2 Implement and maintain Airport Land Use Policy Plans for public use airports to address compatible land use designations, noise issues and safety considerations within and adjacent to each airport facility. C5.3 The County, in coordination with the Economic Development Agency, shall enforce federal and State regulations related to land use planning around airport facilities. C 5.4 Recognize and support policies contained in the March Air Cargo Port General Plan and Inland Ground Access Plan. C 5.5 Consider access implications associated with adjacent development and circulation plans, and promote efficient and safe access improvements on airport facilities. C 5.6 Minimize adverse environmental and safety impacts of County airports on surrounding communities through implementation nfthe Riverside County Airport Land Use Plan. C 5.7 Recommend flight patterns for new and existing airports to avoid noise sensitive neighborhoods. Non-motorized Transportation Riverside County should establish safe and convenient facilities to accommodate the use of non-motorized modes of transportation to enhance the future liability and character of the County. It will also be important to provide non-motorized access among residential neighborhoods, employment centers, shopping areas, and recreational facilities. To satisfy the need for mobility within the towns and throughout the region, options to the automobile and public transit systems should be developed. In addition, a comprehensive trail system should be planned in such a way that it provides access to the County's many diverse recreational oppormmfies. The bikeway 'iverside Generat Plan - Draft network in the unincorporated area should provide non-motorized alternatives for commuter travel as well as recreational opportunities. Fmher, Riverside Count' should encourage safe pedestrian walkways within commercial office, industrial, residential and recreational developments that also adhere to the American with Disabilitv Act (ADA) requirements. Most importantly, to ensure that the non- motoriz~ system is implemented, Riverside County should actively seek all available means of financing such improvements including State and federal grants. Policies: General C 6.1 Encourage the use of existing railroad right-of-ways for non-motorized facilities, where appropriate. C 6.2 Encourage and support maintenance of existing non-motorized facilities. C 6.3 Whenever economically and physically possible, provide separate rights of way for non-motorized trails. C 6.4 Promote coordination in planning, design, construction and implementation standards, where applicable, among the County, Caltrans, the Cities, WRCOG, CVAG, RCTC, and other agencies to provide integrated non- motorized trails to maximize safety and minimize potential conflicts with pedestrian and motor vehicles. Recreational Trails C6.5 The Riverside Coun~ General Plan t: ~ Regional Trails Map Figure XX and policies depict conceptual trail alignments within Trail Alignment Plarming Corridors. The precise alignment of a trail within a Tra Alignment Planning Corridor shall be Multipurpose regional open space end, . . . · . · ..... ......... easen on the physical characteristics oI me area anu communtty/netgneomooo pue c spaces are permanent elements of the Riverside Countyc°nsider connections to recreatioinal areas, landscape, employment centers, community centers, residential ~ ~ areas and transit centers. Where practical, trails shall be aligned along road rights-of-way, and flood control and utility easements. C 6.6 Recreation trails within the County right-of-way shall have a public agency responsible for maintenance. C 6.7 Concurrent with the approval of any development proposal, all required ultimate trail rights-of-way and easements must be identified, dedicated and approved and determined to be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and Recreation Trails Plan Map of the General Plan and with current Riverside County design criteria, standards, and practices. Plans for recreation trails must illustrate how trails systems integrate with backbone trails, environmental corridors, recreational facilities, and schools. C 6.8 Design the recreation trail system to utilize drainage courses and waterways, canal easements, levees, environmental corridors, power-line easements and other public fights-of-way whenever possible. County of Riverside General Plan - Oraft Circulation ~]ement C6.9 Development conditions of approval, or other methods of financing such improvements may be utilized by the County to address implementation and maimenance costs. Private entities will be solely responsible for the implementation and maintenance of recreation trails contained within existing and new private developments. Bikeways C6.10 Bikeways shall be developed in compliance with the standards establishedin the Caltrans Highway Design Manual or other appropriate standards. C6. ll Provide for bicycle travel on arterial highways as depicted on the Regional Trail Plan Map Figure XX. Bicycle travel will also be accommodated on arterial highways during roadway construction, widening or other improvements, whenever feasible and practical. C6.12 Encourage other modes of transportation (buses, trains, etc.) to plan for, and provide space for carrying recreational and commuting bicyclists on public transportation systems where feasible. C6.13 Review and update the Regional Trail Map as needed, in order to assure compatibility with the other elements of the County General Plan, and with the bikeways plans of WRCOG, CVAG, RCTC, the Cities, and adjacent counties. C 6.14 The County shall consider bicycle transportation needs in the review of development projects, and where appropriate, should require provision of bicycle access between a proposed development and other par~ of the County through dedication of easemems and construction of bicycle access ways which connect with other bicycle access ways. C 6.15 Solicit and utilize all sources of local, regional, State, and federal funds to plan, acquire right-of-way for, and construct bikeways. Pedestrian Facilities C6.16 Appropriate facilities shall be provided for the safe movemem of pedestrians within developments, as specified in the attached Ordinance No. 460, Regulating the Division of Land of the County of Riverside. C6.17 Encourage removal of barriers (walls, easements, and fences) for safe and convenient movement of pedestrians. Special emphasis should be placed on the needs of disabled persons considering ADA regulations. C 6.18 Assure pedestrian access from development to existing and future transit routes and termmat facilities. C6. I9 The County shall plan for pedestrian access in designing street and road projects. The County shall continue its requiremem for such facilities consistent with road design standards. Provision of pedestrian paths or sidewalks and timing of traffic signals m allow safe pedestrian street crossing shall be included. 'iverside General Plan - raft C 6.20 The County should work with local communities to ensure that school children have adequate transportation routes available, such as a local pedestrian or bike path, or local bus service. C 6.21 Assure appropriate pedestrian access to existing and future transit routes and terminal facilities. Scenic Corridors We are proud of the distincftve identities that · · , J An ~mportant goal of thc County is to preserx e aha our communities now possess and cherish __ ., · , · . . ., · · _ _ mennance me region s unique or specm aesmet c the sense of piece that results n'om me .... We want this sense of plece andand vlsun resources thl'ough sensitive highway distinctiveness maintained and enhanced indesigI1 and the regulation of development within our planning and development ectMlies. Scenic corridors. This can be acoomplishcd ~through thc coordination of maintenance, enhancement, and development of existing and new scenic corridors with Caltrans, RCTC, CVAG, WRCOG, thc cities, and thc development community aimed at preserving the aesthetic qualities of the environment. Policies: The development of scenic highways will not C 7. l Preserve scenic routes that have exceptional only addtothepleesureoftheresidentsofor unique visual features in accordance with this State, but wilt also play an important mteCaltrans' Scenic Highways Plan. in encouraging the growfh or,he recreation and tourist industries upon which theC 7.2 Where necessary to preserve unique or special visual features, impose conditions on development within a scenic highway comidur to require dedication of scenic easements consistent with Caltrans' Scenic Highways Plan and discussed in the Land Use Element. C7.3 Where feasible, utilize contour grading and slope rounding to gradually transition graded road slopes into the natural configuration consistent with the topography of the area. Environmental Considerations Riverside Countyis e family of special County's transportation system must be planned, designed, constructed, operated, and communities in a remarkable envirenmentatimplemented in a maimer that maintains a high setting, level of environmental quality. Transportation ~stem improvements should be implemented to minimize disturbance of the natural environment - RCIP ~sionand other sensitive environmental features covered under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) guidelines. Policies: C 8.1 All development proposals shall be reviewed to insure that preservation of specimen trees within road rights-of-way when at all possible. County of Riverside Generat Ptan- Oraft Circulation Element C 8.2 All roadways located within identified flood areas shall be provided with adequate flood control measures. C 8.3 Roadways shall be located outside identified flood plains whenever possible. C 8.4 Dust shall be controlled during all stages of roadway construction. C 8.5 All ~:oad rights-of-way shall be protected from blowing sand. C 8.6 All streets and highways located within identified blowsand areas shall be protected from blowsand hazards. C 8.7 Adequate measures shall be taken to project Count).' residents from transportation generated noise hazards. Increased setbacks, walls, landscaped beams, other sound absorbing barriers, or a combination thereof shall be provided along freeways, expressways and four lane highways in order to project adjacent noise-sensitive land uses from traffic-generated noise impacts. C8.8 Specific requirements of the Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) shall be incorporated into transportation plans and development proposals, where applicable. C8.9 Alignments for new roadxvays, or for improvements to existing roadways and other transportation system improvements, should avoid, wherever practicable, disturbance of existing communities, and biotic resource areas. C 8.10 Implement the Circulation Plan in a manner consistent with federal, State and local environmental quality standards and regulations. C8.11 Review and monitor proposals for expansion of pipelines for the transport of suitable products and materials, and require mitigation of environmental impacts. In particular require mitigation of the potential for hazardous chemical or gas leakage and explosion. C8.12 Specific requirements of the General Plan Air Quality Element shall be incorporated into transportation plans and development proposals where applicable. Transportation Systems Management Riverside County should implement transportation systems management (TSM) strategies that enhance traffic flow and reduce travel delay along the unincorporated County roadway system. We must make the efficient use of our current and future road network. Priority should be given to Transportation System Management (TSIvI') strategies that improve level of service, especially in areas that are currently fully developed, before more costs and descriptions capacity increasing strategic are used. Policies: C 9.1 Enhance the uninterrupted movement of vehicles along bus routes by providing bus turnouts. vers de General Plan - Braft C9.2 C 9.3 C9.4 C9.5 C9.6 C9.7 Encourage the use of HOV lanes Such lanes should be continuous, linking major population centers with employment centers. IfHOV lanes are used, make them available for mixed flow traffic during non-peak periods where warranted and feasible. Priority shall be given to Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies to improve level of service, particularly in areas which are currently fully developed. Traffic signals shall be constructed and improved at appropriate intersections. Whenever possible, traffic signals should be spaced to optimize traffic operation and facilitate signal coordination. Roadway expansion at public expense to relieve congestion shall only be considered once it has been determined that TSM measures will not be effective. Auxilia .ry lanes sha I be nsta ed whenever necessary to relieve congestion and safety hazards. Installation of one-way streets, exclusive or reversible lanes shall be undertaken where applicable. Transportation Demand Management ~ransponation demand management (TDM) strategies that reduce dependence on the s~ngie-occupant vehicle and enhance mobility along congested corridors are an important priority for the management of the County's transportation system. Such strategies should be consistent with Rule 1501 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the County Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Guidelines. Policies: C 10.1 The County shall continue with implementation of its TDM Design Guidelines. The goal of the TDM Guidelines is to reduce single occupant motor vehicle trips during peak hours and modify the vehicular demand for travel to increase the ability of the existing system to can'y mom people. C 10.2 Coordinate with Caltrans and other responsible agencies to identify the need for additional park-n-ride facilities along major commuter travel ~orridors. C 10.3 Developments that are identified as major trip attracters (i.e., commercial and employment centers) shall incorporate the potential for public transit service in their design. Goods Movement/Besignated Truck Routes The efficient movement of goods in and through Riverside County is vital to the inland Empire's economy and will improve traveler safety. This can be accomplished through design, construction and maintenance of the regional and local street and highway system The County should identify street and highway improvement and County of Riverside General Plan - Orgft Circulation Element maintenance projects that will improve goods movements and implement the projects that are economically feasible. Policies: CII.I Street and highway projects should be implemented so that goods movement can continue to be convenient and economical in areas where large concentrations of truck traffic exist. C 11.2 Where extensive truck travel involving regional movement of bulk goods is anticipated, roadway standards to accommodate large trucks should be implemented. C 11.3 Support continued operation of the regional freight rail system, which offers safe, convenient and economical transport of commedities. C 11.4 Support provisions to physically separate heavily traveled rail lines from heavily traveled streets and roads. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) involves the use of advanced electronics, communications, and computer systems that increase the efficiency and safety along the regional transportation system. These technologies can provide real-time information exchange between drivers and the roads, giving rise to the terms smart cars and smart highways. These technologies have also expanded to include other forms of transportation including public transportation, rail, and goods movement. ITS allows drivers and other s3,stem users access to up-to-the-minute information on traffic conditions, alternate routes, and directions to unfamiliar destinations. The Inland Empire ITS Strategic Plan was approved by the Riverside County Transportation Commission in 1997 and outlines fumm plans for ITS implementation. The Plan contains a list of goals and policies m be followed by responsible agencies within the County to achieve a viable ITS infrastmctore that improves mobility and enhances safety within the region. Other Reviewers Comments on the Riverside County Draft Circulation Element From: Dan Silver <dsilveda@earthlink.net> To: Cathy Bechtel <CBECHTEL@rctc.org>, ""SMITH," STEVE A." <steve.smith@transcore.com>, Al Bell <abell@planningcenter.com>, Dick Ramella <rramella@pianningcenter.com>, Melani Smith <msmith@pianningcenter.com> Date: 8/17/01 8:14AM Subject: Comments on drat Circulation Element August 14, 2001 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ONLY Cathy Bechtel Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Ave. Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Comments on draft Circulation Element The Endangered Habitats League (EHL) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft Circulation Element policies. As you know, EHL is a Southern California organization dedicated to ecosystem protection, improved land use planning, and collaborative conflict resolution. C 1.11 Should bring in the Transit Oasis concept here. C 2.1 Should not Area Plan levels of service be consistent with the General Plan, that is, equal or better? C 2.8 (second paragraph) Regarding requiring traffic studies, what about the cumulative impact of of numerous "insignificant" projects? Are not traffic studies needed for cumulative impacts? C 2.10 Should include project denial as a potential outcome for unmitigated traffic impacts. C 2.22 The purpose of this confusing policy is unclear. Is it about mandating a particular type of highway project or about landform impacts? Why is there an absolute requirement to construct improvements to meet traffic demand * "shall" is used" irrespective of availability of funds, cost-benefit of the project, environmental impacts, community impacts, etc. The "shall" preempts the normal decision-making process, which takes into account a full range of factors. Also, the notion of "minimizing excessive cut and fill" is internally contradictory. Suggest: If highways serving as arterials through mountainous and rural areas are improved to meet travel demand, cut and fill shall be minimized. C 2.33 Road standards should not be delegated to the Fire Dept. We need an up-front action plan to permit narrower streets. C 3.7 Need to bring in the Oasis concept here. C 3.10 Should also state that underlying land use designations and specific plan requirements should support transit. C 6.18 Should add that these features will be implemented through project design. C 9.5 Developer fees should be used for fair share financing. Sincerely, Dan Silver, Coordinator cc: Steve Smith Dick Ramella Al Bell Melani Smith Interested parties Dan Silver, Coordinator Endangered Habitats League 8424-A Santa Monica Blvd., #592 Los Angeles, CA 90069-4267 TEL 323-654-1456 FAX 323-654-1931 CELL 213-804-2750 dsilverla@earthlink.net Comments from the General Plan Advisory Committee on Circulation Element Policie Discussed August 7, 2001 · Serious issues existing with street design. They neea to be ironed out with the County, BIA, and fire department. They are mostly issues with local streets, not necessarily with the General Plan roadways. · Make sure terms are defined · County should have a database that is updated in real time, linking transportation with other planning elements · Need to identify right-of-way requirements for furore expansion of freeways to accommodate buildout. Need to show these on area plans as an overlay zone or something similar. Also needs to show on circulation plans. · Need to emphasize the importance of resolving the CPTC restriction on the 91 · Policy C1.5 - delete the word "current" · Policy C2.4 - Need to have a brief summary or description of each of the documents mentioned in this policy · Policy C2.6.1 - Don't burden the county with too many negotiations - try to resolve as much up front as possible · Policy C2.7 - Perhaps the ,~olicies referring to Ordinance Nos. 460 and 461 should include amplify on ~he principles in those ordinances · Policy C2.17 - change "heavy duty" to "through" · Policy C2.31 - Reword - confusing · Policy C2.33 - Important, but don't give Fire Department carte blanche · Policies on fixed route transit service - Need to modify terms and/or provide definitions - activity center, transfer site, transit sp!ne network. Transit oasis not mentioned. · Policy C4.6 - Should cross-reference policies on open space · Policy C6.5 - Cross-reference related policies · Policy C6.7 - Reference provisions for privacy and security - who is going to take care of trails? · Policy C6.17 - Add words on maximizing visibility and access for pedestrians. Also add words on pedestrian safety, lighting, etc. · Policies on scenic corridors - Should be more specific ,d cross-reference back to open space policies. · Policy C8.4 - Dust is not the only construction impact - maybe reference as a more generic issue · Policies on transportation system management - provide definitions in margin · Policies on goods movement - Need discussion that Riverside Co. lies in the path of transportation from Asia and Mexico Proposed Policies for Circulation Element Submitted by Bruce Colbert August 7, 2001 Congestion Relief Standard Discussion The consultant team is proposing to downgrade the County's existing congestion relief standard in the Circulation Element. Downgrading the standard would: · lower the quality of life, and make Riverside County a more Congested, less desirable place to live or work · make air quality worse by increasing the amount of stop-and-go traffic increase people's waiting times in waffle by 50 percent in the Community Development areas - a 10-minute wait in lights now will become a 15-minute wait under the proposed standard allow LOS F in the Communfly Centers when combined with Policy 2.8, which means that ~"6ple's waiting~times in traffic w~ll be three times longer - a wait for one traffic light change now to get through an intersection, will take three light changes to get through an intersection in the Community Centers under the proposed standard. The cumulative effect of traffic impacts is almost invariably one level-of-service worse flum was planned. Therefore, keeping the existing standard would provide the needed cushion to mitigate for future, cumulative traffic impacts. In addition, downgrading appears unnecessary because the Circulation Element traffic model shows that the existing standard is easily achievable for County arterials in the proposed, enhanced circulation network. The existing standard provides much discretionary flexibility to approve projects that require a higher LOS within one mile of a freeway or that provide overriding benefits but don't meet the LOS standards. This flexibility allows the standards to adapt to increased densities in the planned urbanized areas. Since land use densities already have been established by the RC~ General Plan, the congestion standard would not alter the planned densities. The Committee should propose a standard representing its understanding of the public preference regarding congestion relief Several factors are involved. The LOS C standard was more common in local jurisdictions in the mid-1980's, however at the time, the public expressed that it was unwilling to pay for the improvements to meet LOS C, and as a result, LOS D has become the norm for local jurisdictions in Southern California. However, financing of transportation improvements has become more advanced in recent years through the use of mitigation fees and assessment districts, making the payment for improvements more equitable and palatable. Numerous specific plans throughout the County already have been planned and entitled using the County's existing congestion relief standard. The consultants propose more "efficient" use of highways. More "efficient" use of highways simply means more congestion. Because people's preference for what is an acceptable level of congestion is a matter of perception, the issue becomes a political decision. The public expressed a strong preference for congestion relief in the public opinion surveys conducted at the beginning of the RCI?, and wants to see congestion reduced from present levels. This strong preference was reiterated in a February 2001 RCTC study, which found that 74 percent of voters expressed an interest in funding transportation projects to reduce congestion. Requested Policv Re-word Policy C.2.1 to use the wording of the County's existing Congestion Relief Standard. Requested PolicF Use the County's existing congestion relief standard in the EIR/EIS. Build-Out Freeway and Transit ROW Discussion Caltrans' ultimate freeway design concept does not include thc CETAP corridors or the build-out traffic needs of Riverside County; therefore, the Cattruns freeway ROWs are not sized sufficiently to relieve the congestion of build-out traffic in Riverside County. For example, the Circulation Element traffic model forecast - which incorporates thc Caltmns ultimate freeway design concept - show that freeways in the County at build-out will operate mostly at LOS F. LOS F conditions are characterized by the formation of backed-up traffic and by waves of stop- and-ga traffic that are extremely unstable. In order to relive congestion on the freeways, more ROW will be needed than that shown by Caltrans. For example, where the Hemet to Lake Elsinore Corridor joins 1-15, that portion of 1-15 may need more ROW at build-out than the current 5-lane design concept provides. The policy being proposed would bridge the public information gap between the amount of ROW shown by Caltrans on its ultimate freeway design concept and the amount of freeway ROW needed to serve the build-out traffic needs of the Riverside County General Plan Circulation Element. This policy proposes a mechanism to identify land that may need to be acquired in the future to address build-out ROW needs. The mechanism would be an Overlay Category on the Areas Plans, showing lands between the Caltrans ROW and the needed build- out ROW. The Overlay Category would allow the base land use to continue until the land is acquired for ROW, which would provide the flex/bility needed for long-range planning of major transportation corridors. As the County determines the build-out freeway ROW needs, including transit ROW, these would be shown on the Area Plans. By showing the build-out ROW needs on the Area Plans, which are used for development aPprovals, the proposed policy would help Riverside County to avoid Orange County's mistakes of having to widen freeways in built-up areas. The information would allow Riverside County to exercise foresight, and would assist in early resolution of issues. It's fa~ easier to reduce the ROW size of a corridor in the future than to widen a corridor in the i' ' future, because t s much easier for the County to vacate land than it is to condemn land. Orange County demonstrates both of those lessons: The CDM Freeway was vacated, and portions of the land have been sold off for residential use, benefiting all parties. On the other hand, as Orange County realized that it needed to widen the 5-Freeway and the 55-Freeway after all, the County had to condemn large portions of commercial and residential land at a much higher cost than if the land had been set aside at the beginning. For freeway segments that are constrained from attaining the congestion-reliving ROW and where no alternative rome is proposed to relive congestion, using the current travel patterns and mode choice, the number of additional lanes that may be needed to relive congestion on a freeway should be noted for informational purposes (if only to illustrate the need to consider other engineering options). Since the Circulation Element traffic model addresses build-out traffic, the Land Use Element should provide the land needed to serve build-om traffic. That would be consistent within the General Plan. The Supervisors want the congestion-solving planning process to be unconstrained by financing considerations at this stage. This information may be needed for the EIR/EIS being prepared for the General Plan. Requested P ol icF The General Plan will show the freeway ROW needed to serve build-om traffic, including transit ROW, as an Overlay Category on the Land Use Element Area Plans. The Overlay Category would identify lands between the Calms ROW and the needed build-om ROW. The Overlay Category would allow the base land use to continue until the land is acquired for ROW. ' Requested ?olic~ Add a policy following C.2.29, stating that: "the County in its land development negotiations will protect the freeway ROW, including transit ROW, needed to serve build-out traffic, shown on the Area Plans." Providing Freeway Congestion Relief Comparative Facts to the Public Discussion A February 2001 RCTC study found that 74 percent of voters expressed an interest in funding transportation projects to reduce congestion. The provision of comparative facts and values to the public to help them make informed decisions regarding specific freeway congestion relief improvements would create public support for the extension ofMensuro A. The CETAP Advisory Committee ought to identify a process to provide comparative facts and values to the public regarding specific freeway congestion relief improvements. The identification and provision of estimates of the incremental costs to achieve each successive improved level-of-service on freeways is needed. By tying a specific cost to a specific result, the public could then effectively decide the LOS standard that they would fund for freeways in Riverside County. The process of providing comparative facts to the public may help to generate public interest in securing additional sources of funding. Perhaps, separate bonds earmarked for freeway congestion relief improvements could be issued. One option for providing comparative facts to the public would be to provide photos that characterize each potential LOS for freeways and then give the corresponding percent sales tax increase needed to fund only the cost-effective improvements to achieve the given LOS, 3 factoring in additional funding sources, existing planned improvements, and time factors. For example: PHOTO LOS E 0.25-cent sales tax increase PHOTO LOS D PHOTO LOS C 0.50-cent sales tax increase 1-cent sales tax increase Requested Polio/ The CETAP Advisory Committee ought to begin a course of action to provide comparative facts to the public by identifying a process for how the facts could be made available. The comparative facts are the approximate incremental costs beyond planned design concept freeway improvements to achieve each successive improved level-of-service on freeways. LOS Standard for Freeways Discussion The consultant team is proposing to set the freeway congestion standard so Iow as to render it meaningless. What the proposed LOS E standard means in practical terms is that freeway conditions will be at or near capacity. Small increases in traffic will cause breakdowns in traffic movement. The Iow standard would: · lower the quality of life, and make Riverside County a more congested, less desirable place to live or work · make it more difficult to move goods in or out of the County, which may drive businesses to more favorable locations outside the County and make it more difficult to increase the jobs/housing ratio · make air quality worse by increasing the amount of stop-and-go traffic. The cumulative effect of traffic impacts is almost invariably one level-of-service worse than was planned. Therefore, keeping the LOS E standard will likely lead to LOS F conditions, which are characterized by the formation of backed-up traffic, and waves of stop-and-go traffic that are extremely unstable. The Circulation Element traffic model shows that LOS F will be the condition of Riverside County's freeways unless action such as this proposed policy is taken by the Committee. A higher standard would provide the needed cushion to mitigate for future, cumulative traffic impacts. Requested Policy Keeping in mind that it is easier to reduce the size of a freeway later than to widen a freeway later, where the build-out freeway ROW is shown on the Area Plans, the ROW will be sized for the facility improvements at the LOS decided by the public as discussed above, or at LOS C. 4 Re~ested ~ Change the added policy following C.2.29, to read that: "the County in it's land development negotiations will protect the build-out freeway ROW, including transit ROW, shown on the Area Plans, needed for the facility improvements at the LOS decided by the public or at LOS C." Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Discussion It would make sense for the County to make sure that it gets the most congestion relief for the money spent. Without a cost-effectiveness analysis, money that could relive congestion could be squandered. So, in order to spend scarce public funds effectively to reduce congestion, the County ought to make sure that a cost-effectiveness analysis is conducted for capital improvement alternatives, within any major transportation corridor such as a freeway. Cost- effectiveness at relieving congestion could be measured by the reduction in how long people have to spend in their cars - or a reduction in total Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT). Transportation solutions need to serve the real travel patterns of people. Requested Polic~ Add a Policy C.2.39, stating that: "a cost-effectiveness analysis for congestion relief, measured in the reduction of total Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT), will be conducted for proposed capital improvement alternatives within any major transportation corridor such as a freeway." Caltrans Discussion The design process would be far more efficient and timely if Caltrans were to play a pro-active role in the design of projects instead of merely rejecting projects after submittal. By actively participating in the design process, Caltrans could build the criteria that need to be met into the design ora project. Requested Policy Add a policy following C.2.20, stating that: "the County will encourage the active participation of Caltrans in the design of highway capital improvement projects." Orange County Corridor Discussion There is no Orange County constituency that needs improvement of the Orange County Corridor. ' Because there is a lack of incentive and political will for Orange County to initiate any action on the Corridor, Riverside County will need to begin actions unilaterally, both in court and in planning; for the Corhdor congestion problem to be resolved. The 91 Express Lanes Transportation Corridor Franchise Agreement blocking needed improvements in the Orange County corridor needs to be eliminated. A policy is needed that would formali?e the goal of resolving this issue. Requested Policy Add a policy following C.2.5, stating that: "the County will partner with government agencies and authorities to provide for improvements and alternative transportation corridors to Orange County." APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIREOTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER /'~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager'~ September 11, 2001 Comment letter on the Domenigoni-Barton Specific Plan No. 310. PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Approve the comment letter for transmittal to the Riverside County Planning Commission BACKGROUND: The Domenigoni-Barton Specific Plan is a 1,734 acre master planned community located in the Winchester area of Riverside County west of MWD's Eastside Reservoir. The land use concept proposes to create a community of 4,600 residential units located within three distinct areas centered around an 18 hole golf course. Staff has prepared comments on the project relative to land use planning practices and impacts to the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: None directly, however, unmitigated traffic impacts by this project may cause the City to expend monies to solve traffic related problems. ATTACHMENTS: Comment letter on the Domenigoni-Barton Specific Plan R:\BROWNS\agency review\SP 310 CC Staffrpt 9-11-01 .doc of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - Temecula - California - 9 - (909) 694-6400 - FAX (909) 694-6477 September 11, 2001 Aleta Laurence, AICP Director of Planning Riverside County Planning Department P.O. Box 1409 Riverside. CA 92502-1409 Subject: Specific Plan No. 310, GPA No. 451 and CZ 6359 Comment Letter Dear Ms. Laurence: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above cases. This comment letter will address our concerns regarding the July 23, 2001 Specific Plan and EIR documents. We have reviewed the traffic impact analysis for the project and conclude that although it is projected that the proposed development will add in excess of 8,000 vehicles per day to Winchester Road south of Benton Road, none of the major intersections on Winchester Road within the City of Temecula were included in the scope of study. It is anticipated that the proposed project's traffic will adversely impact several intersections on Winchester Road in the vicinity of the I-15 Freeway. The Traffic Impact Analysis for the project only considers intersection LOS for the existing conditions and the year 2020. There is no interim analysis for opening year or various phases of the project to identify phased off-site improvements and funding sources to mitigate the project impacts at various stages of development. Moreover, the Traffic Impact Analysis identifies numerous costly off-site improvements; however, it does not appear that a funding mechanism is in place for the proposed off-site improvements. The EIR for the project recommends that the County General Plan Circulation Element be amended to upgrade Winchester Road to a classification of "Transportation Con'idor". Again this recommendation is indicative of the project's impact on Winchester Road. In addition the EIR considers the project's impacts to the to be significant regionally and requires a statement of overriding considerations for impacts to traffic and circulation. We would request that this project not receive approval until the traffic problems can be resolved. RSBROWNSkagency review~SP310-9-114)1 comment letter.doe Aleta Laurence, AICP September 11, 2001 Page 2 The project may be premature based on the unknowns of the proposed Diamond Valley Lake West Recreation Area land uses and the Eastside Reservoir in general. If there are 2-4 million visitors per year how can this be planned intelligently for a future use that is still unknown at the reservoir? If you should have any questions regarding our comments please contact Stephen Brown at (909) 694-6400. Sincerely, Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Shawn Nelson, City Manger City Council Planning Commission RSBROWNS~agcncy rcvicw~SP310-9-11-01 comment letter.doc 2 Vicinity Map i-lemet ITEM 15 CITY ATTORNEY I1~'1/1,~ Di . FINA O CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services DATE: September 11, 2001 SUBJECT: Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations and Appropriation for Additional Telephone Equipment Prepared by: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator RECOMMENDATION: 1. Award a contract for Pentium based computer workstat ons to Think! Computer Products of Irvine, California in the amount of $39,054.75. 2. Appropriate $40,000 from Development Impact Fees - Corporate Facilities, which will include $22,482 for the purchase of additional telephone equipment. BACKGROUND: The City recently completed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purpose to select a qualified vendor to purchase thirty (30) Pentium based computer workstations. These new systems are necessary for the workstations being created in the Maintenance Facility expansion currently under construction. A total of ten (10) proposals were received and reviewed. The proposals ranged from a Iow of $39,054.75 from Think! Computer Products of Irvine, California to a high of $55,792.50. Forty-seven RFP packets were mailed (eleven to local Temecula vendors), of which the following ten (10) vendors responded. Vendor Think! Computer Products, Irvine CA Unit Price Total Quote $1,301.83 $39,054.75 Tech 101 -Arcus, Inc., Irvine CA Golden State Trading Co., Brea CA Jaguar Systems, Inc., Riverside CA Computer Masters, San Diego CA Sys Technology, Inc., Cypress CA LPS Computer Service Group, Inc., Escondido CA CompuSource, Carlsbad CA Sterling Computers, Lomita CA LAN Solutions LLC, San Diego CA $1,487.28 $44,618.25 $1,531.88 $45,956.25 $1,538.33 $46,149.75 $1,602.83 $48,084.75 $1,644.38 $49,331.25 $1,649.78 $49,493.25 $1,682.15 $50,464.50 $1,760.85 $52,825.50 $1,859.75 $55,792.50 Think! Computer Products of Irvine, California submitted the lowest qualified quote, meeting all the technical specifications of the RFP. Agenda Reports'PC Workstations These systems were specified with ViewSonic ViewPanels instead of a traditional CRT monitor, due to the significant decrease in the cost of these monitors over the past year. Current pricing, confirmed by the lowest bid, shows an approximate $50 difference between the traditional CRT monitor and the fiat panels. The benefits of these panels are many; ergonomic issues affecting City employees, both from the aspect of moving and installing equipment to limited-space workstation issues and the angle at which employees must use their computers; significantly reduced energy consumption; and a life of ten years, instead of three years. Additional telephone switching equipment ($8,791), instruments ($5,175), and cabling ($8,516), consistent with our current telephone system, are also necessary for the completion of the Maintenance Facility expansion project. This equipment and installation will be purchased from Exp~,,nets, our current contract vendor for telephone equipment support under a separate agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in Development Impact Fees Corporate Facilities to fund the $40,000 appropriation. Attachment: Request for Proposal Price Sheet - Think! Computer Products Equipment Purchase Agreement Agenda Reports'~PC Workstations EXHIB~ A CITY OFTEMECULA REQUESTFOR PROPOSAL PRICING SHEET PARTI: EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS Qty Description Unit Price Extended Pdce 30 Personal Computer Workstation - ATX Mid-Tower Case w/300W/UL PS/2 Power Supply (Must comply with Part 15 of FCC Rules) - Intel D815EEA2 Motherboard w/Intel integrated graphics, Audio and LAN 10/100 connectivity - Intel 1000MHz Pentium Ill Processor 256K System Cache - 128MB PC133 SDFIAM, lx128 - 40GB Hard Drive, 7200 rpm (Minimum) - Teac 1.44MB, 3.5' Floppy Drive - 50X CD-ROM, ATAPI Drive - 250MS iomega Zip Internal ATAPI Drive - Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite - Logitech two button Wheel Mouse (Optical) - Amplified 2 piece Multimedia Speaker System - Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional -APC Back-UPS 500 (500 VA) UPS O~O(.~, c~ Z/.~IO~O, ~'~ 30 ViewSonicViewPane115"VG150 /7/0_~. CC, /Z/,~-0, ~-o J Three (3) year on-site warranty for labor, parts and technical Support with minimum eight (8) hour response time (Monday Through Friday 8am - 5pm. PART I1: PRICING ITEM TOTAL Equipment per specifications (PART I) ~ (.~ ..~ ~-'-'~ O, Deliver Char~]es Sales Tax (Temecula 7.5%) ~ 7 Z. ~.~/, 7~" Other Costs (Please identify) TOTAL PRICE ~ c~.~ 0:~¢../, 7~' Address: /.~2/Z- /~/~' /~. City/St/Zip: /~/,/'/,,~'- Phone: ~/-/?-~/~_.~-~)'Z-"ZZ .Fax: FedTaxlD:~--~--C)z'/z'J-~/q Signature: /~"~ ~ Date: 5 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS EXHIBIT B Attach a statement of qualifications outlining vendor's corporate profile and experience in providing (insert requirement) required by this RFP. 2. Attach a list of client references, to include the following information for each reference: Reference Company Name Point of Contact Company Street Address City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number Attach a statement of warranty for all work to be provided. 4. Attach a copy of all City, County, Federal and State licenses required, as applicable. Attach a copy of resumes or licenses/permits for all personnel in your shop who will be (Insert requirement). 6. Selected Vendor will provide the following documentation upon execution of the contract: Certificate of Insurance for: Workers Compensation, General Liability, Automobile Liability, Excess/Umbrella Liability, and Personal Property Damage in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence. Early P. ay Discount: A __~__% discount is offered for payment within ~ days. (Note: No less than 15 days will be considered for purpose of bid evaluation). By signing this RFP, Vendor has read and will comply with all terms and conditions herein. Signature of Authorized Representative Name and Title /T 6 i~an Jones' COT view 17 cRT 2001:08,~'~_~.d-f THINK! COMPUTER PRODUCTS 16812 Hale Ave. IA/ine, CA 92606 (909) 929-4224 Tel / (909) 929.2004 Fax w'~w,thinkcp.com QUOTE 22-Aug-01 Bill TO: Ship To: Name City of Temecula Name City of Temecula A~n~o. Tom Hafeli Attent]oo Tom Hafeli A~mss 43200 Business Park Dr. ^~ress 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Temecuta, CA 92589-9033 Phone (909) 694-6456 F~x (909) 694-6498 Pending Keith Schneider 3 - 5 Days FDO UPS Net 30 Days Qty Description Part Number Unit Price Total I Viewsonic 17" Professional Series CRT 3t9.00 3t9.00 · Shipping is estimated, subject fo change. Warranty Info: 'One (1) year parts or manufacturer warranty. · Think! C.P. will assist in all manufacturer warranties. · One (1) year labor (depot). Sub Total 319,00 Shipping 25.00 Taxes 23.93 Total 367.93 THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITYI COT View 17 CRT 2001-08-22 CITY OF TEMECULA PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT This Purchase and Installation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of August 28, 2001, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Think! Computer Products ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained heroin, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purchase and Sale of Equipment. On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to manufacture, sell and deliver to the City, Personal Computer Workstations as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Request for Proposal/Pricing Sheet, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment"). 2. Purchase/Installation Price. The Purchase and Installation price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment and service is Thirty-nine thousand, fifty-four Dollars and seventy-five Cents ($39,054.75). The Purchase price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor/n accordance with the following schedule: Net 30. 3. Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment manufactured and installed. All of the Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of theEquipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment axe in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware the City is purchasing the Equipment for use as Computer Workstations on the City's Wide Area Network consisting of both Microsoft NT and Novell Servers and that City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contain or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 4. Performance. Vendor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described heroin. Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 3. 5. City Approval. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be fia'nished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement llq ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 6. Time of Delivery. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before Friday, September 21,2001 with weekly delivery of at least ten (10) systems per week through October 5,2001. 7. Place of Delivery. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 8. Reiection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City pursuant to Section 5, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment and Installation, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment and Installation, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder or the Installation. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Equipment and Installation tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all clalms, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the City. its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or from the Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 11. Contract Documents. a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: (1) Vendor's response to the Request for Proposal dated August 1, 2001, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) Request for Proposal dated August 15, 2001, attached hereto as Exhibit B. b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the RFP and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendor's Response to the RFP. and the RFP shall prevail over the Vendor's Response to the RFP. 2 12. Default of Vendor. a. The Vendor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event the Vendor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Vendor for any work performed after the date of defauit and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines the Vendor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Vendor with written notice of the default. The Vendor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the Vendor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right. notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 13. Survival of Representations and Warranfien. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement. 14. Legal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City. and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 15. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 16. Indel~endent Contractor. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor shall at all times be under the Vendor's exclusive direction and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of the Vendor or any of the Vendor's officers, employees, agents or volunteers except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its o.fficers, employees or agents are in any manner, officers, employees or agents of the City of Temecula. Vendor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind the City in any manner. 17 Assi~,nment, The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 18. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To Vendor at: Think! Computer Products 16812 Hale Avenue Irviee, California 92606-5021 To Cityat: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589 Attn: City Manager 21. Governing Law. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the fights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. 22. Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 23. Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind Vendor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. //// IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Vendor Think! Computer Products Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk ITEM 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City ManagedCity Council .~usan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services September 11,2001 SUBJECT: Award of Contract for HP Procurve Network Switches Prepared by: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for HP Procurve Network Switches to Sys Technology, Inc. of Cypress, California in the amount of $35,672.30. BACKGROUND: The City recently completed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purpose to select a qualified vendor to purchase four HP Procurve Network Switches to replace the Cities current network switches which has been showing signs of fatigue. A total of seven (7) proposals were received and reviewed. The proposals ranged from a Iow of $35,672.30 from Sys Technology, Inc., of Cypress, California to a high of $48,645.90. Forty-seven RFP packets were mailed (eleven to local Temecula vendors), of which the following seven (7) vendors responded. Vendor Total Quote Sys Technology, Inc., Cypress CA Jaguar Systems, Inc., Riverside CA e-Systems Design, Brea CA Peacock Systems, Chino CA CompUSA, San Marcos CA Golden State Trading Co., Brea CA LAN Solutions LLC, San Diego CA $35,672.30 $37,916.79 $37,922.78 $41,215.73 $42,105.17 $45,130.65 $48,645.90 Sys Technology, Inc., of Cypress, California submitted the lowest qualified quote, meeting all the technical specifications of the RFP. A network switch is the backbone of a network, connecting all the workstations, printers, plotters, scanners, servers, and other network devices together. The HP Procurve switches are designed for high-performance, with redundant power supplies and hot swappable modules for easy service. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds were appropriated in the 2001-02 Fiscal Year Budget for the Information Services internal Services fund. Attachment: Request for Proposal Price Sheet- Sys Technology Inc. Equipment Purchase Agreement ,_...,1 Sys Technology, Inc. .. 6481 GLOBAL DRIVE CYPRESS, CA 90603 (800) 613-9963 EXT. 113 BROBERTS~SYS.COM PART 1: Ef UIPEMENT SPECIFICATIONS Qty-DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE System 1 ' l-J4865A, HP Procurve switch 4108gi $799.00 $799.00 3-J4894A, gl transceiver module $789.00 $2367.00 4-J4862A, gl 10/100-TX module $1199.00 $4796.00 1-J4839A, redundant power supply $799.00 $799.00 9-J4131A, Gigabit-SX transceiver $309.00 . $2781.00 1-10 Meter SC-ST Fiber Cable $40.00 $40.00 System 2 I-J4865A, HP Procurve switch 4108gl $799.00 $799.00 1-J4894A, gl transceiver module $789.00 $789.00 5-J4862A, gl 10/100-TX module $1199.00 $5995.00 1-J4839A, redundant power supply $799.00 $799.00 3-J4131A, Gigabit-SX transceiver $309.00 $927.00 2-1 Meter SC-SC Fiber Cable $29.00 $58.00 System 3 I-J4865A, HP Procurve switch 4108gl $799.00 $799.00 1-J4894A, gl transceiver module $789.00 $789.00 5-J4862A, gl 10/100-TX module $1199.00 $5995.00 I-J4839A, redundant power supply $799.00 $799.00 · 3-J4131A, Gigabit-SX transceiver $309.00 $927.00 2-1 Meter SC-SC Fiber Cable $29.00 $58.00 System 4 1-J4121A, HP Procurve switch 400m $1699.00 $1699.00 1-J4119A~ redundant power supply $1029.00 $1029.00 Thre~ (3) year warranty for labor and par~ PART H: . PRICING ITEM TOTAL Equipment per specifications (part 1) $33~044 00 Deliver Charges $150.00 Sales Tax (Temecula 7.5%) $2478.30 Other Costs (please identify) TOTAL rmc~. $35,672.30 Vendor Name: Sys Technology, Inc. Address: 6481 Global Drive Phone: (800) 613-9963 ext:113 Contact: Brett A~ Roberts City/SffZip: Cypress, CA 90630 Fax:(714) 821-9592 Feb Tax ID: 95-4856339 Signatur~e: 8/24/01 CITY OF TEMECULA PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT This Purchase and Installation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of September ! 1, 2001, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Sys Technology Inc., of Cypress, California ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purchase and Sale of Equipment. On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to manufacture, sell and deliver to the City, Personal Computer Workstations as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Scope of WorkIProposal Sheet, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment"). 2. Purchase/Installation Price. The Purchase and Installation price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment and service is Thirty-five thousand, six hundred, seventy-two Dollars and thirty cents ($35,672.30). The Purchase price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: Net 30. and warranties to City: Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the following representations a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the fight, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment manufactured and installed. All of the Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware the City is purchasing the Equipment for use as Computer Workstations on the City's Wide Area Network consisting of both Microsoft NT and Novell Servers and that City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contain or will contain any untrue statement ora material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 4. Performance. Vendor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted 3. standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. City Approval. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 6. Time of Deliver,. before October 15, 2001. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or 7. Place of Deliver*. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 8. Reiection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City pursuant to Section 5, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment and Installation, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment and Installation, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder or the Installation. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with ail reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Equipment and Installation tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent effor~ to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or from the Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 11. Contract Documents. a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a pan hereof.' (1) Vendor's response to the Request for Proposal dated August 24, 2001, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) Request for Proposal dated August 8, 2001, attached hereto as Exhibit B. b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the RFP and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendor's Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over the Vendor's Response to the RFP. -2- 12. Default of Vendor. a. The Vendor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event the Vendor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Vendor for any work performed after the date of defanlt and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines the Vendor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Vendor with written notice of the default. The Vendor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the Vendor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 13, Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement. 14. Legal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 15. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 16. Independent Contractor. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor shall at all times be under the Vendor's exclusive direction and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of the Vendor or any of the Vendor's officers, employees, agents or volunteers except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner, officers, employees or agents of the City of Temecula. Vendor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind the City in any manner. 17 Assignment The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. -3- 18. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to thc other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To Vendor at: Sys Technology, Inc. 6481 Global Drive Cypress, California 90630 To City at: City of Temecula 4.3200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589 Attn: City Manager 21. Governing Law. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. 22. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 23. Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Vendor waixants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind Vendor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. -4- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Vendor Sys Technology, Inc Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk -5- ITEM 17 APPROVAl/. CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN(~EA~ CITY MANAG EFI TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager ~,,-~ September 11,2001 Community Services Grant Agreement with the Temecula Sister City Association PREPARED BY: Robin Gilliland, Recreation Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Community Services Grant Agreement with the Temecula Sister City Association in the amount of $10,000 for fiscal year 2001-02. DISCUSSION: The Temecula Sister City Association (TSCA) is a California non- profit corporation that supports cultural exchanges of people and ideas between the citizens of our community and foreign communities. In doing so, the outlook of our citizens is enhanced and Temecula's quality of life improved. In the past, the City and the TSCA have worked together to coordinate and promote Sister City activities, travel and special events. The TSCA has grown and is now ready to take on a greater role in these areas with less oversight provided by City staff. The City will continue to support and encourage the TSCA in their efforts to promote cultural exchange with our Sister Cities, Voorburg, Netherlands and Nakayama, Japan with limited staff support and funding. The City Council approved a line item in the FY 2001-02 budget of $10,000 to assist with necessary activities and functions. The Community Services Grant Agreement more specifically outlines each of the responsibilities and duties to be carried out by the City and the TSCA. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding in the amount of $10,000 is appropriated in the budget for FY 2001-02 for the Temecula Sister City program. These funds are available in account 001- 101-999-5280. R:\Gillik\Sister City Programkagreements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and the Temecula Sister City Association, a non-profit corporation, and is dated as of September 11, 2001. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each of the parties hereto acknowledge and agree to be tree and correct: a. The Temecula Sister City Association ("TSCA") coordinates many programs for cultural exchanges within the City of Temecula, which are not provided by the City's recreation program. b. The TSCA warrants and represents to the City that it is a non- profit, tax exempt corporation under the tax laws of the United State and California, and agrees to continue in such status during the term of this Agreement. b. On June 12, 2001 the City Council awarded a community services grant to the TSCA in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for the purpose of continuing and enhancing its cultural exchange programs within the City of Temecula and abroad. The City Council allocated $10,000 for the costs of items indicated in Exhibit A for fiscal year 2001-2002. paid to the TSCA. This Agreement provides for the manner in which the grant will be 2. The City shall pay to the TSCA for services as described in this agreement for the period July 1, 2001 through June 30, 200 an amount not to exceed $10,000.00 per year. TSCA shall submit an invoice to the TCSD at the end of each fiscal year for the actual costs of cultural exchanges and shall be accompanied by such documentation as reasonably required by the Director of Finance to establish that such costs were incurred by the TSCA. 3. The term of this agreement shall be September 11, 2001 to June 30, 2002. 4. The TSCA and City have developed goals and objectives which are set forth in Exhibit A. The TSCA is committed to implementing these Goals and Objectives. 5. The City may at any time, for any breach of this Agreement, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the TSCA at least ten (10) days prior written notice. If the breach is corrected during this ten day period, City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, rescind the termination. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. TSCA shall make available to the City its books, records and financial R:\Gillih'~Sister City Program~agreements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc documents in such form as to allow City to verify TSCA's compliance with the terms of this Agreement. 6. The TSCA agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of TSCA's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability attributable to the active negligence of the City. 7. TSCA shall procure and maintain, or shall have provided on its behalf, for the duration of fiscal year 2001-2002 insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the activities of the TSCA, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 1! 85 or 88, including a non-owned auto endorsement. (2) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Workers Compensation Insurance shall not be required if the TSCA has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. TSCA shall maintain limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than the following amounts unless otherwise approved by the City Manager: (1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. (2) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the TSCA; premises owned, occupied or used by the TSCA; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the TSCA. The coverage shall R:\Gillik\Sister City Program~greements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, the TSCA's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the TSCA's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The TSCA's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. TSCA shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the TSCA's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 8. TSCA is and shall at all times remain as to the City and TCSD a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of TSCA shall at all times be under TSCA's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of TSCA or any of TSCA's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. TSCA shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. TSCA shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 9. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as R:\Gillilr\Sister City Prog~amkag~eements\tsca final agreement 2001-02,doc set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager To TSCA: Temecula Sister City Association 27349 Jefferson Ave. Suite 213 Temecula, California 92593 Attention: Ad Cmemers & Mark Katan Co-Chairmen 10. The TSCA shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 11. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. R:\Gillilr\Sister City Program~greements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney TEMECULA SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION, a California non-profit corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: R:\Gillilr\Sister City Program~agreemen~s\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and the Temecula Sister City Association, a non-profit corporation, and is dated as of September 11, 2001. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each of the parties hereto acknowledge and agree to be true and correct: a. The Temecula Sister City Association ("TSCA") coordinates many programs for cultural exchanges within the City of Temecula, which are not provided by the City's recreation program. b. The TSCA warrants and represents to the City that it is a non- profit, tax exempt corporation under the tax laws of the United State and California, and agrees to continue in such status during the term of this Agreement. b. On June 12, 2001 the City Council awarded a community services grant to the TSCA in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for the purpose of continuing and enhancing its cultural exchange programs within the City of Temecula and abroad. The City Council allocated $10,000 for the costs of items indicated in Exhibit A for fiscal year 2001-2002. paid to the TSCA. This Agreement provides for the manner in which the grant will be 2. The City shall pay to the TSCA for services as described in this agreement for the period July 1, 2001 through June 30, 200 an amount not to exceed $10,000.00 per year. TSCA shall submit an invoice to the TCSD at the end of each fiscal year for the actual costs of cultural exchanges and shall be accompanied by such documentation as reasonably required by the Director of Finance to establish that such costs were incurred by the TSCA. 3. The term of this agreement shall be September 11, 2001 to June 30, 2002. 4. The TSCA and City have developed goals and objectives which are set forth in Exhibit A. The TSCA is committed to implementing these Goals and Objectives. 5. The City may at any time, for any breach of this Agreement, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the TSCA at least ten (10) days prior written notice. If the breach is corrected during this ten day period, City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, rescind the termination. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. TSCA shall make available to the City its books, records and financial R:\Gillilr~Sister City Program~greements\tsca finaI agreement 2001-02.doc documents in such form as to allow City to verify TSCA's compliance with the terms of this Agreement. 6. The TSCA agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of TSCA's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability attributable to the active negligence of the City. 7. TSCA shall procure and maintain, or shall have provided on its behalf, for the duration of fiscal year 2001-2002 insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the activities of the TSCA, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88, including a non-owned auto endorsement. (2) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Workers Compensation Insurance shall not be required if the TSCA has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. TSCA shall maintain limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than the following amounts unless otherwise approved by the City Manager: (1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. (2) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the TSCA; premises owned, occupied or used by the TSCA; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the TSCA. The coverage shall R:\Gillilr~Sister City Program~agreements\~sca final agreement 2001-02.doc contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, the TSCA's insurance coverage shall he primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the TSCA's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The TSCA's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. TSCA shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the TSCA's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 8. TSCA is and shall at all times remain as to the City and TCSD a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of TSCA shall at all times be under TSCA's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of TSCA or any of TSCA's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. TSCA shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. TSCA shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 9. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as R:\Gillik\Sister City Program~agreements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager To TSCA: Temecula Sister City Association 27349 Jefferson Ave. Suite 213 Temecula, California 92593 Attention: Ad Creemers & Mark Katan Co-Chairmen 10. The TSCA shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 11. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. R:\GillikXSister City Program~agreements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.do¢ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney TEMECULA SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION, a California non-profit corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: R:\Gillilr~Sister City ProgramXag~eements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and the Temecula Sister City Association, a non-profit corporation, and is dated as of September 11, 2001. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each of the parties hereto acknowledge and agree to be true and correct: a. The Temecula Sister City Association ("TSCA") coordinates many programs for cultural exchanges within the City of Temecula, which am not provided by the City's recreation program. b. The TSCA warrants and represents to the City that it is a non- profit, tax exempt corporation under the tax laws of the United State and California, and agrees to continue in such status during the term of this Agreement. b. On June 12, 2001 the City Council awarded a community services grant to the TSCA in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for the purpose of continuing and enhancing its cultural exchange programs within the City of Temecula and abroad. The City Council allocated $10,000 for the costs of items indicated in Exhibit A for fiscal year 2001-2002. paid to the TSCA. This Agreement provides for the manner in which the grant will be 2. The City shall pay to the TSCA for services as described in this agreement for the period July 1, 2001 through June 30, 200 an amount not to exceed $10,000.00 per year. TSCA shall submit an invoice to the TCSD at the end of each fiscal year for the actual costs of cultural exchanges and shall be accompanied by such documentation as reasonably required by the Director of Finance to establish that such costs were incurred by the TSCA. 3. The term of this agreement shall be September 11, 2001 to June 30, 2002. 4. The TSCA and City have developed goals and objectives which are set forth in Exhibit A. The TSCA is cotmmitted to implementing these Goals and Objectives. 5. The City may at any time, for any breach of this Agreement, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the TSCA at least ten (10) days prior written notice. If the breach is corrected during this ten day period, City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, rescind the termination. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. TSCA shall make available to the City its books, records and financial R:\Gillilr\Sister City ProgramXagreementsYsca final agreement 2001-02.doc documents in such form as to allow City to verify TSCA's compliance with the terms of this Agreement. 6. The TSCA agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of TSCA's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability attributable to the active negligence of the City. 7. TSCA shall procure and maintain, or shall have provided on its behalf, for the duration of fiscal year 2001-2002 insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the activities of the TSCA, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88, including a non-owned auto endorsement. (2) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Workers Compensation Insurance shall not be required if the TSCA has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. TSCA shall maintain limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than the following amounts unless otherwise approved by the City Manager: (1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. (2) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the TSCA; premises owned, occupied or used by the TSCA; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the TSCA. The coverage shall R:\Gillilr\Sister City Program~agreements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, the TSCA's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the TSCA's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including broaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The TSCA's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City by certified mail, tatum receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. TSCA shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements am to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the TSCA's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 8. TSCA is and shall at all times remain as to the City and TCSD a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of TSCA shall at all times be under TSCA's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of TSCA or any of TSCA's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. TSCA shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. TSCA shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 9. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as R:\Gillik~Sister City Program~agreements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager To TSCA: Temecula Sister City Association 27349 Jefferson Ave. Suite 213 Temecula, California 92593 Attention: Ad Creemers & Mark Katan Co-Chairmen 10. The TSCA shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 11. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. R:\GiIlilr\Sister City Program~greements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney TEMECULA SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION, a California non-profit corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: R:\Gil[ilr\Sister City Program~agreements\tsca final agreement 2001-02.doc ITEM 18 ORDINANCE 01-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.0'10(D) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON MEADOWS PARKWAY BETWEEN LA SERENA WAY AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order to determine the appropriate speed limits, WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segments of roadways designated in this Ordinance indicate that the following speed limit be established in accordance with the results of the engineering and traffic surveys. SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limit only on the following street: "Name of Street and Portion Affected Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit, Miles Per Hour Meadows Parkway - La Serena Way to Rancho California Road 45 SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. R:/Ords 2001/Ords 01-13 1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01-13 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of August, 2001 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 11th day of September, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Ords 2001lOrds 01-13 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 APPROVAL I CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE DIRECTOR~_ CITY MANAGER ~// TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: General Manager/Board of Directors Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~ September 11, 2001 Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Community Services District for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2001. Please see the attached financial statements for an analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2001 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department Temecula Community Services District Combining Balance Sheet As of June 30, 2001 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Total assets Parks & Service Service Service Recreation Level A Level B Level C 1,315,277 73,510 18,178 $ 97,069 $ 415,907 7,796 13,008 1,406,965 $ 104,865 $ 428,915 Liabilities mhd fund balances: Liabilities: Other current liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fm~d balances $ 350,192 350,192 $ 5,059 $ 83,549 61,169 995,604 5,059 83,549. 1,056,773 99,806 345,366 $ 1,406,965 $ 99,806 345,366 $ i04,865 $ 428,915 Please note that these balances are mmudited Temecula CoIranunity Services District Co~nbining Balance Sheet As of June 30, 2001 Assets: Cashandinvestments Receivables Due from other funds Total assets Service Service Debt Level D Level R Service Total $ 108,110 $ 17,007 $ 502,981 $ 2,456,351 50,880 758 8,634 154,586 18,178 $ 158,990 $ 17,7~65 $ 511,615 $ 2,629,115 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Other current liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances 18,531 $ 457,331 18,531 457,331 502,690 563,859 140,459 17,765 8,925 1,607,925 140,459 17,765. 511,615 2,171,784 158,990 $ 17,765 $ 511,615. $ 2,629,115 Please note that these balances are miaudited Temecula Coinmunity Services District Citywide Operations Statement ofRevanues, Expendintres and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended Jtme 30,200I Amlual ganended YTD Total Budget Activity Encmnbr. Activity of Budget Special tax $ 2,486,100 $ 2,324,820 $ 2,324,820 TCSD admin fee crediff"REST" 1,729,000 1,729,000 1,729,000 Recreation programs 536,700 521,556 521,556 Investment interest 40,000 46,691 46,691 Miscellaneous 168,900 186,002 186,002 Operating trm~sfer in 44,200 Total Revenues Expenditures: 5,004,900 4,808,069 4,808,069 94% 100% 97% 117% 110% 96% P~ks, medians mid arterial street lighting 3,237,601 2,977,347 $ 67,445 3,044,792 94% Seniors 146,800 111,352 111,352 76% Conununity Recreation Center (CRC) 345,670 335,I89 335.189 97% Recreation programs 327,210 307,773 307,773 94% Temecula Community Center (TCC) 143,780 i 17,999 117,999 82% Museum 176,300 146,157 146,157 83% Aquatics 249,380 212,I52 212,152 85% Sports 169,230 118,336 118,336 70% Operating transfers out 568,000 567,182 567,182 100% Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begiuning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 5,363,971 4,893,487 $ 67,445 $ 4,960,932 (359,07I) (85,418) 1,142,092 1,142,092 $ 783,021 $ 1,056,674 92% 3 Temecula Community Services District Service Level A Aflefial Street Lights and Median Maintenance Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Special tax Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating Transfers Out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, JuDy 1,2000 Eading Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 Annual An~ended YTD Budget Activity Encumbr. Total Activity of Budget $ 44,200 $ 39,343 39,343 44,200 39,343 39,343 (44,200) (39,343) 39,343 39,343 $ (4,857) $ Note: All activity in Service level A is now recorded in the Citywide Operations Fund. Temecula Community Services District Service Level B Residential Street Lights Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Investment interest Street Iighting fees Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Salaries & wages Street lighting Miscellaneous Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1,2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 Annual A~nended YTD Budget Activity Encumbr. Total Ac6vib, 348,400 $ 345,036 2,000 2,160 15,600 17,250 12,000 600 378,000 365,046 of Budget $ 345,036 99% 2,160 108% 17,250 111% 600 5% 3,150 2349 353,530 353,530 I1,170 7,135 367,850 363.314 365,046 2,649 353,530 7,135 10,150 1,732 98,074 98,074 $ 108,224 $ 99,806 363.314 97% 84% I00% 64% 99% Temecula Community Services District Service Level C Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance Statement of Rev~ues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Am~ual Aanended YTD Budget Activity Revenues: Assessments $ 559,800 $ 548,291 Investment interest 19,000 19,081 Plan check and inspections 25,000 12,930 Miscellaneous 12,000 600 Total Revenues 615,800 580,902 Expenditures: Salaries and wages 120,820 99,804 Landscape maintenance and rehab 360,900 360,051 Utilities 138,100 125,581 Other expenditures 85,330 51,086 Total Expenditures 705,150 636,522 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (89,350) (55,620) Begimfing Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 400,987 400,987 Ending Fund Balance, June 30. 2001 $ 311,637 $ 345,367 Encumbr. Total Activity Percent of Budget $ 548,291 98% 19,081 100% 12,930 52% 600 5% 580,902 99,804 360,051 125,581 51,086 636,522 94% 83% 100% 91% 60% (1) 90% Notes: (1) The variance is primarily due to lower than anticipated slope repair and maintenance costs being incurred. Temecula Community Services District Service Level D Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Revenues: Assessments Grants Invest~nent interest Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Salaries and wages Refuse hauling Other expenditures Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begimfing Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Encumbr. Total Activity 2,597,960 $ 2,500,394 14,300 14,279 19,000 18,935 5,000 5,000 2,636,260 2,538,608 $ 2,500,394 14,279 18,935 5,000 2,538,608 24,990 22,609 2,597,960 2,550,437 34,210 20,617 $ 2,657,160 2,593,663 22,609 2,550,437 20,617 Percent of Budget (20,900) (55,055) 195,513 195,513 $ 174,613 $ 140,458 96% 100% 100% 100% 96% 90% 98%(2) 60% 0 2,593,663 98% Temecula Cmrammity Services District Service Level R Streets and Roads Statement of Revenues, Expenditares and Changes in Fnnd Balance - Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 Amended YTD Budget Activity Revenues: Assessments $ 11,600 $ 11,308 Investment interest 500 969 Total Revenues 12,I00 12,277 Expenditures: Emergency street maintenance 17,080 12,080 $ Other expenditures 80 47 Total Expenditures 17,160 12,127 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (5,060) 150 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 17,614 17,614 Ending Fund Balm~ce, June 30, 2001 $ 12,554 $ 17,764 Encumbr. Total Activity 11,308 969 12,277 0 12,080 47 12,127 of Budget 97% 194% 101% 71% 59% 71% Temecula Community Services District Debt Service Fand Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Fiscal Year Ended Jane 30, 2001 Operating transfers in Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Debt service - principal Debt service - interest Other expenditures Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Begizming Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending F~md Balance, June 30, 2001 Amended Total Budget Activity $ 463,000 $ 462,182 35,600 34,896 498,600 497,078 Percent of Budget 100% 98% 210,000 210,000 100% 281,700 281,665 100% 6,300 5,465 87% 498,000 497,130 100% 600 (52) 511,668 511,668 $ 512,268 $ 511,616 ITEM 2 APPROVAL~'~, CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE D I RECTOR_~L~:~_~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~ September 11, 2001 S.M.A.R.T. Program Presentation PREPARED BY: Julie Crowe-Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Receive and file this report and video presentation regarding the "Summer Months Activities and Recreation in Temecula" (S.M.A.R.T.) program. BACKGROUND: As a direct result of a request made by Council member, Jeff Stone and approved by all members of the City Council, the program known as S.MA.R.T became a reality. In late June of 2001, the Community Services Department officially introduced the S.M.A.R.T. program to the citizen's of Temecula. This program was designed to offer youth ages 7- 15 years, the opportunity to participate in a free, drop-in supervised summer program that included games, ads and craffs, sports, water games, special events and much more. The program was held Monday- Friday from 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. at Winchester Creek Park, Margarita Community Park, Pala Community Park, Temeku Hills Park and the City's new park site at Vail Ranch Parkway and Nighthawk Pass. With the help of city staff, parents and Temecula's youth, the S.M.A.R.T. program of 2001 was a tremendous success. Tonight we have a special video presentation that illustrates the success ofthe program FISCAL IMPACT: None R:\CROWE J~AGE N DAS\S MART. doc Activities and Recreation proud to present a new and exciting program. The .... S.M.A.1LT." program will nm all summer long, beginning Monday, June 25th and end Friday, August 17th. Recreation staff will be on site each day, Monday through Friday from 9:00 a~m. - 5:00 p.m. Activities will include a variety of arts and crafts, sports, water games and special events for absolutely FREE? The program is for children between the ages of 7-15. So, be sure to fred one of the five park sites nearest you, and join us for a fun filled summer. FIV EXCITIING LOCATIONS *Winchester Creek Park I *Margarita Community Park 39950 Margarita Way/ 29119 Margarita Road *Temeku Hills Park 31367 La Serena Way *Pala Community Park 44900 Temecula Lane *Park Site in Vail Ranch Vail Ranch Parkway/Nighthawk Pass For more information on activities or a park nearest you, please call 694-6480 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AUGUST 28, 2001 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 9:09 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLLCALL PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBER: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts None Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk Ballreich. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of July 24, 2001; 1.2 Approve the minutes of August 14, 2001. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORT,~ No comments. R:\Minutes.rda\082801 1 ADJOURNMENT At 9:10 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, September 11, 2001, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:'~Minutes.rda\082801 2 ITEM 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: A P P R O V~,~/,/~,,,~-.. CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA_N~E /~/"- CITY MANAGER C:::X,'] / CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning September 11, 2001 Development Code Amendment (Planning Application 91-0120 - non-profit clubs and lodge meeting halls, compact parking spaces, courtesy curbs, temporary signage, minimum lot area, and commercial building offsets) PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE TYPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE BACKGROUND: The Development Code was adopted by the City Council in 1995. Since its adoption, the Code has been periodically amended to improve its clarity and to modify various provisions as problems are identified. These proposed changes are intended to improve clarity, to provide additional direction, and to correct typographical errors. The Planning Commission considered these amendments at its August 15, 2001 meeting. At this meeting, the Commission received public testimony and continued the proposed amendments to the second unit and political signage provisions and is recommending that the Council not adopt the proposed changes to allow non-profit clubs and lodge meeting halls in the Very Low, Low-l, Low -2, and Low Medium residential zones. In addition to a number of typographic and other minor changes, the Planning Commission is recommending the following changes to the Development Code Amendments. · Compact Parking Spaces--The Commission had previously expressed a concern that compact spaces were not meeting the needs of drivers. At the Commission's request, staff presented several options to the Commission. The options ranged from reducing the allowable percentage to prohibiting compact parking spaces. The Commission is recommending that compact parking spaces no longer be allowed for new development. · Courtesy Curbs--The Code requires landscaped planters to be constructed in vehicle parking lots. In practice, the landscape material in planters adjacent to vehicle parking spaces is being damaged by foot traffic from people exiting their vehicles, in an attempt to provide an appropriate stepping area for persons exiting their vehicles, the Commission is recommending amending the Code to require a minimum 12 inch wide Temporary Signago To clarify some confusion about temporary signs in the fourth quarter of each year, the Commission is recommending that the Council amend the ordinance to require a 30-day "down period" for attached temporary sign permitted during the fourth quarter. Previously, the Ordinance had not clearly require this down period. Minimum Lot Area--The City's General Plan and Development Code Sections 17.06.020.A through D describes the minimum lot size in terms of net acres while Table 17.06.040 describes minimum lot size in terms of gross acres. To resolve this conflict, the Planning Commission is recommending that the Table be amended to be consistent with the General Plan and refer to net lot area. Commercial Building Offsets--Commercial development within the City includes both large and small scale projects. The Development Code recognizes that large scale development can produce buildings whose architecture includes long unarticulated walls. The Code already clearly addresses this concern for industrial buildings. The Commission is recommending that this provision be added to Section 17.08.070.C.2 in an attempt to prevent "big box" commercial development with long unarticulated walls, which is inconsistent with the Citywide Design Guidelines. The Planning Commission continued discussions on two of the proposed code amendments, the modifications to requirements for political signs and second dwelling units were continued to allow staff and the City Attorney to provide additional information on these items. The one item, the Commission is not recommending that the Council adopt a modification that would have allowed Non-Profit Clubs and Lodge Meeting Halls in the Very Low, Low-l, Low -2, and Low Medium residential zones. At present, the only residential zones this kind of use is allowed are the medium and high residential zones. Environmental Determination An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed amendments would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan. The Checklist indicated that the proposed amendments would not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City's General Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared for the original Development Code. As a result, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council make a determination that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact is anticipated. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance -Page 3 Planning Commission Resolution -Page 9 Planning Commission Staff Report -Page 11 A'I-rACHMENT NO. 1 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 01- R:~DEVCODE~01*0120 Amendment~Sta~ff Reporl CC1 .doc ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on August 15, 2001, and recommended that the City Council approve the following amendments to the City Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; and, WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on September 11, 2001 to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map and the Temecula Municipal Code. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendments To The City Municipal Code. The following minor code clarifications to Chapter 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows: A. Amend Section 17.06.020.E read, "Medium Density Residential (M). The medium density residential zoning district is intended to provide for the development of attached and detached residential development. Typical housing types may include single-family, duplexes, triplexes, townhouses and patio homes, with a density range of 7 - 12 dwelling units per acre." B. Amend Section 17.06.020.F to read, "High Density Residential (H). The high density residential zoning district is intended to provide for the development of attached residential development. Typical housing types may include townhouses, stacked dwellings and apartments, with a density range of 13 - 20 dwelling units per acre." C. Amend Section 17.06.040, Table 17.06.040, amend the portion with the heading "Minimum gross lot area (acres)" to read, "Minimum net lot area (acres)". D. Amend Tables 17.08.040A and B of Section 17.08.040 to add superscript numeral I to the end of the heading to read, "Minimum required landscaped open space~''. E. Amend Tables 17.08.040.A and B of Section 17.08.040 to include a notes section with a note that reads: "1. Minimum required landscaped open space area does not include the necessary planting within the right-of-way." F. Amend Section 17.08.070.C.2 to include an item d which reads, "Long unarticulated walls should be avoided. Wallplanes should not extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty (50) feet without an offset or enhanced architecture articulation." G. Amend Section 17.24.040.E., to read, "Compact Car Parking. Compact car parking spaces shall not be allowed." H. Amend Section 17.24.050.H.6 to read, "All interior landscaped islands adjacent to vehicle parking spaces shall be protected and enclosed in a 12 inch concrete curb no less than 6 inches in height." I. Amend Section 17.28.600.C.1 to read, 'q'he maximum duration for attached promotional signs during the first through third quarters (January through September) of the year is one thirty (30) day period per quarter, with a consecutive sixty (60) day down period, during which time promotional signs are not permitted. During the fourth quarter (October through December) promotional signs are permitted for two thirty (30) day periods provided that the temporary sign is down for at least thirty (30) days before the temporary signage is used again." J. Amend Section 17.34.010 to read, '"'Lot coverage" means that portion of the lot that is covered by buildings and structures, which is derived as the quotient of the gross lot acreage divided by the area covered by the footprint(s) of the buildings or structures." Section 2. Amendments To The City Municipal Code. The following typographic error corrections to Chapters 8 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows: A. Amend the first sentence of Section 8.16.060 to read, "If at the end of the time allowed for compliance in the original notice, or as extended in cases of appeal, or as specified by the board of appeals, compliance has not been accomplished, the officer issuing the notice or the agency of which he is an officer may order the hazardous vegetation to be removed by public officers or by employees of said agency, or may cause removal to be carried out by a private contractor selected by the City in accordance with applicable statutes and in the manner and under the terms specified by the City Council." B. Amend the second sentence of Section 8.16.060 to read, "The cost of such removal accompanied by a reasonable administrative charge may be imposed as a special assessment upon the property, and such property shall be subject to a special assessment lien for such purpose." C. Section 17.05.010.H, amend the first sentence of the paragraph to read, "The approving authority may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to the expiration, grant a time extension of one year (up to three extensions may be granted)." read "Slope". Section 17.080.060.C.5, modify the first word in the first sentence to Planning. Section 17.24.040.A, amend the last sentence by capitalizing Director of Section 3. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. Environmental Compliance An Environmental Checklist was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed amendments would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared for the original Development Code. The Checklist indicated that the proposed amendments would not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared for the original Development Code. As a result, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council make a determination that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required. Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full fome and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days affer its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __th day of __., 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day of ,2001 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the th day of __, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk A'I-rACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION DRAFT PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE TYPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE" WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the adopted Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment on August 15, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending Chapters 8 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to make typographical and other minor changes to the Municipal Code that is substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Environmental Checklist was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed amendments would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan. The Checklist indicated that the proposed amendments would not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared for the original Development Code. As a result, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council make a determination that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental impact Report for the General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required. R:'~DEVCODE~01 o0120 Amendment'~Staff Repot[ CC1 .dOC DRAFT Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of August, 2001. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of August ,2001, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~DEVCODL%01-0120 .A,-nen dment'~t afl Report CCl.dcc ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT- PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION August15,2001 Planning Application No. 01-0120 (DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS) Prepared by.' Dave Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE TYPOGRAPHICAL AND OTHER MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE" BACKGROUND The Development Code was adopted by the City Council in 1995. Since its adoption, the Code has been periodically amended to improve its clarity and to modify various provisions as problems have been identified. These proposed changes are intended to improve clarity, to provide additional direction, and to correct typographical errors. This staff report is intended to analyze the proposed changes for your review and consideration. ANALYSIS The proposed changes are intended to achieve three objectives: provide policy interpretation, provide clarity, and correct typographical errors. The typographical changes, proposed in Attachment 1, are self- explanatory and are found in Sections 8.18.060 and 17.05.010.H. The proposed policy and clarifications are listed below in detail. Proposed Policy Interpretations Non-Profit Clubs and Lodge Meeting Halls--Staff has received several inquiries in recent months from people wanting to locate a non-profit club and lodge meeting hall within the City. The Development Code limits the placement of these facilities to the medium and high density residential zones excluding large areas where these uses might also be appropriate. Available property zoned for medium or high density residential uses within the City is limited, further complicating the placement of club and lodge meeting halls. Staff is recommending amending Section 17.06.030, Table 17.06.030 of the Development Code to allow non-profit club and lodge meeting halls without the sale of alcohol as a conditional use in the Very Low (VL), Low (L-1 and L-2), and Low Medium (LM) residential zones to provide R:\DEVCODE~01-0120 Amendment\PC Staff Report-8-15-01 ,doc more of an opportunity for location of such facilities. As a conditional use staff has the opportunity to review the potential impacts of the project on the surrounding residential uses and recommend conditions that will mitigate aspects of the operation pertaining to noise, hours of operation, site design and traffic. Further, if conditions of approval on the conditional use permit (CUP) are violated, the City has a legal recourse (i.e.: revocation of the CUP). Staff's recommendation is to amend Table 17.06.030 to conditionally permit non-profit clubs and lodge meeting halls in the VL, L-l, L-2, and LM zones by editing the table as follows: Description of Use Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls-without the sa~e of alcohol HR VL L-1 L-2 'Mr EI H I - C C C C P P Political Signago The Code Enfomement Division has express concerns regarding the orientation of political signs within the City. Last election season political signs were displayed with the sign faces oriented toward one another or with one sign mounted on top of another. As a result, the signs that were displayed had a larger sign face. In an attempt to reduce visual clutter and prevent postings of this nature, staff is recommending that Section 17.28.050.O.2 of the Development Code be amended to provide for a 36 inch separation between political signs posted. Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.28.050.O.2 to read, "Signs must be separated by no less than 36 inches. There shall be no limit on the number of signs during the ninety (90) days prior to a state, federal, or local election and fourteen (14) days after the election. A sign erected or placed for a candidate who prevails in a primary election may be maintained until 10 days after the final election." Second Dwelling Unit--Section 17.06.050.M.3 and 17.06.050.M.4 of the Development Code currently provides a property owner the flexibility to build a 400 square foot to 1,200 square foot second dwelling unit in zones where the allowable density can be met. Residents with large lots who want to build units in excess of 1,200 square feet have approached staff. Analysis of this request indicates that to allow a larger unit on larger lots would be appropriate and is unlikely to create significant adverse impacts. Staff recommends modifying the Code to permit second dwelling units that are no greater than 75 percent of the primary dwelling with the following stipulations: 1) For lots less than 1 acre, the second dwelling unit cannot exceed 1,200 square feet and 2) for lots greater than or equal to 1 acre, the second dwelling unit cannot exceed 2,000 square feet. Sections 17.06.050.M.3 and 17.06.050.M.4 address the size of the second dwelling unit but distinguishes between attached and detached. As the Code is written the size of the second dwelling unit does not change whether it is detached or attached; therefore, staff is recommending the elimination of this distinction. Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.06.050.M3 and M4, add a new item M5, and renumber the section based on the remaining items. Section 17.06.050.M.3 shall be amended to read as follows, "A second unit on a residential lot may be attached or detached." R:~DEVCODE~01-0120 Amendment\PC Staff Report-8-15-01.doc 2 Section 17.06.050.M.4 shall be amended to road as follows, "A second dwelling unit on a lot less than 1 acre shall not exceed 75 percent of the primary dwelling unit up to a maximum of 1,200 square feet." Insert a new Section number 17.06.050.M5 to read as follows, "A second dwelling unit on a lot of I acre or greater shall not exceed 75 percent of the primary dwelling unit up to a maximum of 2,000 square feet." Compact Parking Spaces--At the December 6, 2000 Planning Commission hearing, the issue of compact parking spaces was discussed. The Commissions' concern was that compact spaces were not meeting the needs of the drivers and sometimes taking up two spaces, thereby eliminating parking for other drivers. The Commission directed staff to bring this issue back as an agendized item with the next series of Development Code amendments. Staff is proposing that the allowable compact parking spaces be reduced from thirty (30%) percent to fifteen (15%) percent. Staff feels this is a reasonable compromise that will not eliminate compact spaces entirely, but at the same time, limit the amount of compact parking spaces each business can provide to meet the needs of larger vehicles. Staff proposes to amend the first sentence of Section 17.24.040 E to read "Compact Car Parking. Up to fifteen percent of the total parking count may be sized for compact cars." Courtesy Curbs--The Code requires landscaped planters to be constructed in vehicle parking lots. In practice, the landscape material in planters adjacent to vehicle parking spaces is being damaged by foot traffic from people exiting their vehicles. In an attempt to provide an appropriate stepping area for persons exiting their vehicles, Staff is recommending amending the Code to require a 12 inch wide concrete courtesy curb on landscaped planters adjacent to vehicle parking spaces. Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.24.050.H.6 to read, "All interior landscaped islands adjacent to vehicle parking spaces shall be protected and enclosed in a 12 inch concrete curb no less than 6 inches in height." Proposed Clarification Amendments Temporary Signago Confusion has arisen in the administration of the temporary signage section of the Development Code. Section 17.28.600.C.1 .e limits the maximum duration of an attached promotional sign to one thirty (30) day period per quarter except in the fourth quarter of the year when the signs are permitted for two thirty (30) day periods. Applications were being submitted which requested one thirty (30) day period at the end of the quarter and one thirty (30) day period at the beginning of the next quarter. The result was a temporary promotional sign with a duration of 60 days, which is in conflict with the Development Code. Due to difficulty administering this provision, the Building Technicians roquested an interpretation of this provision from the Planning Department. The interpretation specified that a quarter is a 90 day period of time, during which, a sign may be posted for 30 days and must be removed for 60 consecutive days. This policy has gained general acceptance with the business community. Staff is recommending amending the Development Code to provide clarity to the existing provision. R:'~DEVCODE't01-0120 Amendment~PC Staff Report-8~15-O1.doc 3 Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.28.600.C.l.e to read, 'q'he maximum duration for attached promotional signs during the first through third quarters (January through September) of the year is one thirty (30) day period per quarter, with a consecutive sixty (60) day down period, during which time promotional signs are not permitted. During the fourth quarter (October through December) promotional signs are permitted for two thirty (30) day periods without observance of the sixty (60) day down period." Residential Densities--Section 17.06.020.E and Section 17.06.020.F of the Development Code describes the Medium and High Density Residential zones but these sections do not indicate allowable density for the zones as found in Sections 17.06.020.A through D. When the public inquires about the density permitted in these zones staff must reference the General Plan. In an attempt to provide the public with clear direction and to facilitate the information dissemination process, Staff is recommending that Sections 17.06.020.E and F be amended to include residential zone target densities consistent with, the other zone descriptions and the City's General Plan. Staff's recommendation is to amend Section17.06.020.E to read, "Medium Density Residential (M). The medium density residential zoning district is intended to provide for the development of attached and detached residential development. Typical housing types may include single-family, duplexes, triplexes, townhouses and patio homes, with a density range of 7 - 12 dwelling units per acre. In addition, amend Section 17.06.020.F to read, "High Density Residential (H). The high density residential zoning district is intended to provide for the development of attached residential development. Typical housing types may include townhouses, stacked dwellings and apartments, with a density range of 13 - 20 dwelling units per acre." Minimum Lot Area--The City's General Plan and Development Code Sections 17.06.020.A through D describes the minimum lot size in terms of net acres while Table 17.06.040 describes minimum lot size in terms of gross acres. Conflict has presented itself so the Planning Director has made the determination that the Development Code should be consistent with the General Plan, therefore, net lot size should be used when addressing minimum lot size. Staff is recommending that the word 'gross' in Table 17.06.040 be replaced with the word 'net' to alleviate further confusion and provide consistency with the General Plan. Amend the second row of Table 17.06.040 with the heading 'Minimum gross lot area (acres)' to read, "Minimum net lot area (acres)". Right-of-Way Planting---One aspect of project review is to determine whether the project provides the minimum required landscaped open space. The Development Code has minimum landscaped requirements that can be found in Table 17.08.040A of Section 17.08.040. Applicants are also required to plant adjacent areas that fall within an easement or right-of-way. The policy has been established that plantings within the right-of-way are not included in the minimum required landscaped open space area because the Public Works Department can reclaim the right-of-way area for public use (i.e.: a read at any time). R:~DEVCODE'~01-0120 Amendment\PC Staff Report-8-15-01.doc 4 Should the Public Works Department reclaim the area it is probable that the landscaped area would be removed resulting in a deficiency of landscaping. Requiring the property owner to maintain at least the minimum landscaped open space area onsite insures that even if the right-of-way area is reclaimed the project will not fall below the code requirement for landscaped open space planting. Staff is recommending that the Code be amended to include this policy which in practice has gained acceptance in the community. Staff's recommendation is to amend Tables 17.08.040A and B of Section 17.08.040 to add superscript numeral 1 to the end of the heading to read," Minimum required landscaped open space1''. Amend Tables 17.08.040.A and B of Section 17.08.040 to include a notes section with a note that reads,"1. Minimum required landscaped open space area does not include the necessary planting within the street right-of-way." Commercial Building Offsets--Commemial and industrial development within the City includes both large and small scale projects. The Development Code recognizes that large scale development can produce buildings whose architecture includes long unarticulated walls. The Code addresses this concern in Section 17.08.070.D.2.a, where it addresses the need to add offsets to break up long unarticulated walls. Staff is recommending that this provision be added to Section 17.08.070.C.2 in an attempt to prevent "big box" commercial development with long unarticulated walls, which is inconsistent with the Citywide Design Guidelines. Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.08.070.C.2 to include an item d which reads, "Long unarticulated wails should be avoided. Wall planes should not extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty (50) feet without an offset or enhanced amhitectural articulation." Lot Coverage - The Development Code uses lot coverage as a development standard but there is no definition of lot coverage in Section 17.34.00. Staff is recommending amending the Code to include a lot coverage definition. Staff's recommendation is to amend Section 17.34.010 to read, '"'Lot coverage" means that portion of the lot that is covered by buildings and structures, which is derived as the quotient of the gross lot acreage divided by the area covered by the footprint(s) of the buildings or structures." ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed amendments would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan. The Checklist indicated that the proposed amendments would not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City's General Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared for the original Development Code. As a result, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council make a determination that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required. R:~DEVCOD~01-0120 Amendment\PC Staff Report-8-15-01.doc 5 GENERALPLAN CONCLUSIONS The proposed amendments are determined to be consistent with the City's General Plan, the General Plan Environmental impact Report and the City's Zoning Map. An Environmental Checklist was prepared and determined that the proposed amendments will not have an adverse effect on the environment beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan and the supplemental analysis prepared for the original Development Code. FINDINGS The proposed Development Code Amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The proposed Development Code Amendments will not have an adverse effect on the community because they remain consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Proposed Ordinance - Blue Page 10 R:\DEVCODE~01-0120 Amendment\PC Staff Repor~-8-15-01.doc 6 ITEM 20 APPROVal ClTYATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN~CF_.~ CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~l,~'..~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer September 11, 2001 Butterfield Stage Road / CETAP Corridors PREPARED BY: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: Eric Haley, RCTC Executive Director and Cathy Bechtel, RCTC Director of Planning and Programming are scheduled to attend our City Council Meeting and discuss the status of the CETAP Corridor Process as it relates to Butterfeld Stage Road. On Monday August 27th and Wednesday August 29th The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) held public scoping meetings at the Temecula Library to sharo information and receive input from citizens about the CETAP process and options under consideration for future transportation corridors to serve Southwestern Riverside County. One of the corridors being evaluated is the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. This corridor is part of the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) being undertaken jointly by the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Transportation Commission. CETAP is one component of the Riverside County Integrated Project, which also includes the Riverside County General Plan update and a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan for western Riverside County. The Winchester to Temecula Corridor has been determined to be extremely important in the future to provide additional north-south transportation opportunities in Southwestern Riverside County. SR 79 North / Winchester is projected to have a 240% increase in travel demand by 2020. Several alternative routes are under consideration to provide for north-south transportation corridors. Two route alternatives (5A & 5B) would run along the City's easterly and southerly boundaries. Corridor 5A generally follows Butterfleld Stage Road from Winchester Road (SR79 North) to State Route 79 South, and then continues west along SR 79 South to I-15. Alternative 5B continues south from SR 79 South along Butterfield Stage Road and intercepts Anza Road and then travels westerlyto 1-15 along the southern area of the Temecula Valley. On August 28, 2001 several Butterfield Stage Road area property owners spoke to City Council and requested that the City voice our objections to the CETAP Corridors 5A and 5B. The property owners were concerned that the Butterfield Stage Road alternative 5A would result in a new freeway along the City's eastern boundaries. City Council directed City Staff to meet with the property owners and report back to CityCouncil. On Wednesday August 29th City Staff met with Cathy Bechtel from RCTC and Steve Smith the County's transportation consultant to discuss the CETAP corridor statuses, preliminary traffic volume projections and the recent property owner concerns with the CETAP study corridors 5A and I r:\agdrpt~2001\091 l\fallrodrunclosure 5B. City staff was told that RCTC understood that the City of Temecula would not support a roadway classification greater than an expressway along Butterfield Stage Road. On Friday August 31, the City Manager and Public Works Director met with approximately thirty Butterfieid Stage Road area property owners who were concerned about the study alignments. The property owners were told that the City was aware of the CETAP process and study alternatives and that the City has consistently held a position that the City of Temecula would not support a freeway along Butte~eld Stage Road. As a result of the RCTC scoping sessions, several people from the Buttedield Stage Road area appeared at the CETAP meeting of On September 4, 2001 and expressed their frustration with alternatives 5a and 5b. The CETAP advisory committee voted unanimously to remove alternatives 5A and 5B from consideration. The CETAP recommendation to remove 5A and 5B is scheduled to be considered by the RCTC Board on Monday September 10, 2001. A verbal report will be made on the outcome of the RCTC Board meeting during the September 11th CityCouncil meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. CETAP EIR/EIS Scoping Information Packet for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor 2. CETAP Transportation Corridor Map 2 r;\agdrpt~001\091 l\fallrodrunclosure WINCHESTER TO TEMECULA CORRIDOR RCIP/CETAP History And Background The Winchester to Temecula Corridor is part of the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) being undertaken jointly by the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC). CETAP is one component of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP), which also includes the Riverside County General Plan update and a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for western Riverside County. The purpose of the RCIP is to integrate the processes of planning land uses, transportation improvements and preserving habitat for endangered species. A primary objective of the RCIP is to accommodate projected population growth within Riverside County by focusing development within areas that will be readily accessible, will provide a good quality of life for future residents, and will minimize environmental and community impacts, including impacts to sensitive habitats and endangered species. The RCIP process seeks to achieve concurrent approvals of the General Plan update, the MSHCP, and two CETAP transportation corridors internal to Riverside County (Winchester to Temecula; Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore) by the year 2002. Separate environmental documents are being prepared for the General Plan update and the MSHCP. According to current projections by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), population and employment are expected to more than double in western Riverside County within the next 20 years. Due to the fast pace of development, opportunities are being lost to preserve land for habitat Conservation and regional transportation facilities. Therefore, an important goal of CETAP is to complete environmental documentation by year 2002, sufficient for use in preserving right-of-way for regional transportation facilities. These facilities are intended to address the mobility needs for both people and goods, with the potential for incorporating the needs for highways and transit, as well as utilities, where appropriate. These facilities may follow existing transportation routes, or traverse presently undeveloped areas. Through early CETAP planning studies, four major transportation corridors have been identified for more detailed analysis, including Winchester to Temecula, Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore, Riverside County to Orange County, and Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County. In July, 2000, the RCTC Board and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors directed the initiation of engineering and environmental studies for the Winchester to Temecula and Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore corridors, which will move forward in parallel. The objective of the proposed EIPJEIS is to provide environmental analysis of a multi-modal transportation corridor within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor study area to allow agencies to .proceed with the preservation of right-of-way for a preferred route alternative. As part oi'this action, ~t is the intent to secure concurrence from appropriate local, regional, state, and federal agencies to allow the preferred alternative to be constructed at the time funding becomes available. Even though actual construction of transportation facilities in this corridor may be a number of years away, there is an urgent need and unique opportunity to make these decisions in conjunction with decisions being made on habitat conservation and land use within the RCIP process. It is important to make these decisions concurrently, and to have certainty as to the ability to construct the needed transportation facilities so that land development can take place in an orderly, efficient, and predictable manner, P:~SVC933\WT Scoping lntB doc (08/10/01) ] minimizing the impacts on habitat, aquatic resources, communities, land owners, and other elements of the environment. Similar to the other two components of the RCIP, the CETAP planning effort has been a stakeholder driven process involving a CETAP Advisory Committee whose membership includes representation from government, environmental organizations, and the building industry. The CETAP planning process is documented in a series of working papers prepared for use by the CETAP Advisory Committee, the County Board of Supervisors, and the RCTC Board. The working papers are available for review at the County and RCTC offices. Purpose And Need Purpose Of The Proposed Transportation Action. The purpose of the proposed transportation action in the Winchester to Temecula Corridor is: to provide multi-modal transportation improvements that will help alleviate future traffic demands and congestion and improve the movement of people and goods between the I~inchester area and the existing Interstate corridors. The following discussion supports the purpose of the action by summarizing the need for transportation improvements in this corridor. Background information can be provided upon request. In addition, the EIR/EIS will have detailed description of the need for transportation improvements and the required background information that presents the context and support for both the purpose and need. Need For the Proposed Transportation Action. This section describes the needs that make transportation improvements in the corridor necessary. The overall need is stated below and supported by background material that is available upon request and will be provided in the EIR/EIS. Given the projected growth and development in Western Riverside Count, there will be inadequate access to the regional transportation system, increased local and regional traffic congestion, and inadequate mobilio: on existing facilities, including regional highways and local arterials within the study area in the future. There is lacl~ of an efficient connection between I~inchester and the Interstate freeways to address the projected movement of people and goods 20 years from now within the interior of }Festern Riverside County. The following statements reflect a summary of the background information supporting the overall need statement stated above: · Growth Projections Within Western Riverside County. · Limited North-South Access to Current and Future Employment Locations. · Inadequate Future Mobility on Existing Facilities within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor Study Area. P:~SVC933\WT Scoping Info.doc (08/1)9/91 ) 2 Proposed Action The proposed action is the preservation of right-of-way for one multi-modal transportation corridor (generally ranging between 300 and 1000 feet in width) and associated facility type and cross-section within the corridor study area. The width defined for preservation may be in the Iow end of the 300- 1000 foot range where circumstances clearly define where the alignment must be located and may be in the high end of the range where circumstances warrant greater flexibility to avoid and minimize impacts, based on more detailed future engineering and environmental studies. Facility type involves defining whether the future facility would be a freeway, major arterial, transitway, etc. Cross-section refers to the number of lanes (mixed flow and high occupancy vehicle lanes), the general width of medians, shoulders, and buffer areas, and the number of tracks, if rail is included. The adopted corridor will then be the subject of a future detailed analysis of on-site alternatives, identification of the preferred alternative and the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative (LEDPA). As part of this action, it is the intent to secure concurrence from appropriate local, regional, state, and federal agencies as to the right-of-way most likely to result in the construction of a multi-modal facility that represents the LEDPA. Construction-level environmental clearance, including applicable permits, would be obtained at a future date. Winchester to Temecula Corridor Description The Winchester to Temecula corridor is defined as representing the north-south travel demand in the area connecting Banning/Beaumont, Hemet, San Jacinto, Murrieta, and Temecula. The Cities of Banning and Beaumont are located along the 1-10 corridor approximately 13 miles north of the City of Hemet. The City of Hemet is located along the intersection of the SR-79 and SR-74. Approximately 16 miles south of Hemet is the MurrietaYTemecula area located adjacent to 1-15 in the vicinity of the 1-215/1-15/SR-79 junction. The focus of the Winchester to Temecula Corridor EIPdEIS is on the southern portion of the corridor, from SR-79 at Domenigoni Parkway near the Winchester area to l- 15 south of Temecula as shown in Exhibit 1. Winchester to Temecula Corridor Alternative Descriptions The following listing represents the CETAP alternatives to be carried forward into the EIR/EIS for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. The exact type of facility and number of lanes to be accommodated within the right-of-way will be determined in subsequent, more detailed environmental documentation, but could include as much as a freeway with mixed flow and HOV lanes plus a transitway, plus room for utilities. Each alternative will include a level of transit service on the HOV lanes appropriate for year 2025. In alignments that depart from SR-79, each alternative (except for the no-build alternative) also includes transit service along SR-79 to a location in the vicinity of SR-79/Ynez Road in Temecula. P:\SVC933\WT Scoping Info.doc (08/09/01) 3 The alternatives to be carried into the EIR/EIS are subject to the results of the scoping meetings to be held subsequent to the publication of the Federal Notice of Intent for the corridor. The proposed alternatives include: The no-build alternative- The no-build alternative will include projects likely to be funded and constructed within the time horizon of the study (2025). Among other projects the no-build alternative assumes a six-lane freeway from the SR-79/Sanderson Ave. junction to SR- 79/Domenigoni Parkway generally following the alignment of Warren Road. A sensitivity test will also be conducted assuming that the SR-79 realignment in this area is a four-lane arterial highway along the Warren Road alignment. Widening ofi-215 to three lanes in each direction is also assumed in the no-build alternative. Alternative I - Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domenigoni Parkway along the current SR-79 alignment to Scott Road. Continue along Scott Road to 1-215. Alternative 3 - Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domenigoni Parkway along the current SR-79 alignment to Keller Road. Continue along Keller Road to 1-215. Alternative 5a - Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domenigoni Parkway along the current SR-79 alignment to Pourroy Road. Continue south to Butterfield Stage Road to SR-79 South. Continue along SR-79 south within the existing right-of-way to I-15, with a reconstructed interchange at 1- 15. Alternative 5b - Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domenigoni Parkway along the current SR-79 alignment to Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road to Anza Road and a new connection from Anza Road/Pala Road westward to a new interchange at 1-15 approximately 1.5 miles south of the existing SR-79/I-15 interchange. Alternative 7a - Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domenigoni Parkway, proceeding westerly to a new interchange with I-215 approximately one mile south of Newport Road. Alternative 7b - Multi-modal facility from SR-79/Domenigoni Parkway, proceeding southwesterly to the I-215/Scott Road interchange. Hybrid alternative- This consists of further widening of multiple existing roadways in the study area, including: widening ofl-15 from its junction with 1-215 to Winchester Road to seven lanes in each direction (six lanes plus one HOV lane) and south of Winchester Road to six lanes in each direction (five lanes plus one HOV lane); widening of I-215 south of Newport Road to five lanes in each direction; and construction of the Date Street connection as a four-lane arterial from Winchester Road to l- 15, with a new interchange at 1-15. Environmental Issues To Be Addressed Environmental Review Process. This section discusses the environmental review process necessary for the completion of the Winchester to Temecula Corridor EIR/EIS. This section describes the environmental issues and analysis proposed to be provided in the EIR/EIS. Pursuant to 40 CFR 1508.28, FHWA intends to tier the ElS for this project. The Tier 1 EIS to be prepared pursuant to this notice shall be programmatic in scope, providing sufficient detail to support a route location decision. A future Tier 2 ElS will be prepared to present the design features and construction level of detail for the evaluation of the preferred route. P:\SVC933\WT Scoping Info,doc (08/09/0I) 5 The EIR/EIS will assess potential project-related and cumulative impacts anticipated to result from implementation of the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor, and will include conceptual mitigation measures to reduce these impacts. The EIR/E1S is intended to provide the necessary CEQA and NEPA clearance for preserving right-of-way for a preferred alternative within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. The preferred alternative will be identified through analysis that will consider the environmental effects of each alternative in relation to how well each alternative addresses the project objectives. Pursuant to the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act, the preferred alternative will be an alternative alignment most likely to yield the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). The analysis will consider both the short-term and long-term impacts associated with the various alternatives described above. The analysis will be based on a conceptual engineering level of design (i.e., a facility eenterline and right- of-way line are defined). A Tier 2 EIR/EIS will be required for CEQA/NEPA compliance prior to construction of the project, following completion of additional engineering for the preferred alternative. The CEQA Guidelines require preparation of objective analysis and documentation to inform decision makers, the general public, and responsible agencies of the direct and indirect environmental .effects ora proposed action, to provide mitigation measures that reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts, and to identify and evaluate alternatives to the proposed project. The RCTC will be the Lead Agency for CEQA. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the County of Riverside are Responsible Agencies for the EIR. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the lead agency for preparation of the EIS pursuant to NEPA. After its publication, the Dra~ EIR/E1S will be available for public review and comment, and a public hearing will take place. Ai~er all comments have been responded to, the RCTC Board of Directors may certify the Final E1R and select a preferred alternative. Following this action by the RCTC Board of Directors, RCTC and Caltrans will request FHWA's approval of the Final EIS and issuance of a Record of Decision. Once the NEPA and CEQA processes are complete, preservation of right-of-way for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor can occur. Probable Environmental Effects. The following explanation of probable environmental effects of the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor is provided to help guide the analysis in the forthcoming E1R/E1S document and to provide information to the public and interested agencies. Air Quality. Regional and local air quality may be affected by the project. Regional emissions will be evaluated to determine if the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor would result in any exceedance of State and federal ambient air quality standards. The analysis will also address whether the proposed improvements would exceed any thresholds of significance established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). A carbon monoxide (CO) hot spot analysis will also be conducted and the results included in the EIR/EIS. Biological Resources. Proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor may impact sensitive biological resources, such as plant life, wildlife, and wildlife habitat. Potential P:\SVC933\WT Scoping Info,doc (08/09/01) 6 impacts include direct loss of habitat from future grading or other future construction activities, direct loss of animals and plants by future project construction, loss or disruption of wildlife movement corridors, and habitat fragmentation. Information on biological resources from the proposed MSHCP for western Riverside County will be included in the EIR/EIS for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor as appropriate. A list of biological resources known to exist and potentially occurring within the Corridor will be included in the EIR/EIS. lmpacts to biological resources will be estimated based on the relationship of the Winchester to Temecula Corridor improvements to known biological resources as identified for the MSHCP. Impacts to sensitive species will be determined based on impacts to habitats for these species. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat areas will be provided through the proposed conservation areas defined in the MSHCP. Additional studies for any threatened or endangered species may need to be conducted as part of future construction level environmental documents. Cultural Resources. The proposed alternatives have the potential to affect both prehistoric and historic cultural resources. Potential impacts include direct loss of resources from future grading or other future construction activities, as well as indirect effects resulting from future construction of the new transportation facilities that may affect the historical context of a particular resource. A records search will be conducted through the Archaeological Information Center at UC Riverside to determine the location of known archaeological sites and any prehistoric resources that are listed or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Because the project requires approval under NEPA, the EIR/EIS will include documentation of the project's compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Section 106 compliance will be conducted applying a phased approach. The level of effort for this phase will include records searches for each alternative and field surveys to spot check areas in the vicinity of recorded sites or resources. Floodplain Evaluation. The proposed project may affect federally designated floodplains. The existing floodplain satting will be documented in the EIR/EIS along with an evaluation of potential floodplain impacts and encroachments. The determination of affected floodplains will be based on the latest available Flood Insurance Rate Maps for incorporated and unincorporated areas of Riverside County. Potential impacts would include loss of beneficial floodplain values resulting from future grading or other future construction activities, as well as increased exposure of humans to floodplain risk in areas where and alternative alignment is located within a floodplain. Hazardous Waste. A hazardous waste Initial Site Assessment (ISA) will be prepared for the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. A records search of agency databases will be conducted to determine whether the alternative alignments would impact known hazardous waste sites. Windshield surveys will be conducted to determine the potential presence of unknown hazardous wastes on or near the alternative alignments. Potential hazardous waste impacts could occur from either soil or groundwater contamination that exists within properties to be acquired for the improvements, or where contamination on an adjacent property would pose a future health risk to construction workers. P:\SVC933\WT Scoping Info doc (08/09/01) 7 Noise. Existing noise levels in the vicinity of the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor will be documented in the EIR/EIS. A noise study will be conducted to evaluate projected noise levels resulting from operation of the proposed corridor improvements. The study will focus on identifying potential noise impacts to sensitive receptors, such as residential uses, hospitals, libraries, and parks. Potential noise impacts include increased noise exposure resulting from increased vehicular or rail traffic within a specific alternative alignment. Section 4(f). Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 specifies that publicly owned land from public parks, recreation areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, or any significant historic site may not be used for projects that use federal funds unless: · There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land. · The highway program or project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to 4(f) lands resulting from such use. The EIR/E1S will include an evaluation of potential impacts to 4(f) resources, which could result from implementation of the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. Socioeconomic and Land Use. The E1R/EIS will include a Community Impact Analysis that will address the potential socioeconomic impacts of the proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. The analysis will be conducted to determine potential socioeconomic impacts of the CETAP corridors, with an emphasis on compliance with Executive Order 12898 regarding Environmental Justice and Executive Order 13045 regarding Protection of Children. The analysis will provide a description of existing land use, housing, employment, and population conditions in the vicinity of the project alternatives. The impact analysis will address the potential impacts on the residential population and local business community within the project impact area for each alternative, including land use compatibility impacts associated with the proposed improvements. The analysis of land use will assess the impacts of each alternative on Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Discussions on environmental justice, right-of-way displacements, relocation assistance, business impacts, neighborhood cohesion, and fiscal impacts (i.e., estimated loss of property tax and sales tax revenues) will be included. The analysis shall also address consistency with relevant local, regional, and state regulations and plans. Visual. Implementation of the proposed improvements will change the visual characteristics within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor. A visual impact analysis will be included in the EIPdEIS to address how the project will affect the existing visual setting. The existing visual characteristics of the area surrounding each project alternative will be documented and significant visual resources will be identified in the analysis. Key issues to be considered in this analysis are removal of vegetation (trees, etc.), the alteration of significant land forms, and the future construction of roads and highway improvements where none presently exist. This assessment will describe the existing visual characteristics of the area and identify any significant visual resources. Photographs from viewpoints near the project alternatives will be used to evaluate the potential visual impacts from future project construction. Impacts shall be assessed in terms of views from existing roadways and views of the proposed improvements, as well as the sensitivity P:\SVC933\WT Scoping Info.doc (08/09t01) 8 of affected viewers. Potential impacts from light and glare will also be included in the EIR]EIS. Water Resources. The proposed alternatives within the Winchester to Temecula Corridor will be evaluated with respect to their potential effect on waters of the U.S. The evaluation will initially focus on opportunities to avoid impacts to these waters, where feasible, by shifting alignments. The EIR/EIS will describe impacts to those water resources that cannot be avoided, and will include mitigation measures to reduce impacts on those resources. Potential impacts to water resources include direct impacts such as dredging or filling of streams, rivers, and lakes, as well as indirect effects to water resources resulting from increased runoff from impervious surfaces such as roads and bridges. Geology and Soils. The EIR/EIS will discuss potential geological impacts of the proposed improvements, with an emphasis on whether alternatives will.result in any increased potential for landslides or seismic hazards. The EIR/EIS will also discuss the increased potential for soil erosion. Public Services and Utilities. The EIR/EIS will discuss the potential for adverse impacts to public services (fire, police, schools, and other public facilities) and public utilities (gas, water, electricity, solid waste, and wastewater). Potential impacts to public services include delays to emergency vehicles during future construction, effects on schools (both direct impacts if land acquisition is required, as well as indirect impacts such as noise), and access to public facilities. Potential impacts to public utilities include direct impacts where the transportation improvements may require relocation of existing utilities. Transportation/Traffic. While the proposed improvements are expected to have a beneficial effect on regional traffic circulation, the EllUEIS will analyze the effect of the alternatives on both regional and local traffic conditions. Adverse impacts may occur on other facilities where traffic volumes are increased as a result of the capacity increase provided by the proposed improvements. P:\SVC933\WT Scoping l nfo doc (08/09/01) 9 · Winchester to Temecula Corridor Analysis EIR / ElS Alternatives DIAMOND VALLEYLAI~E PRELIMINARY DRAFT "'1~ 5a, 5b Temecuia ITEM 21 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE ~ CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Ma n age r/~,~ ~.~ cil Gary Thornhill,~ep~ty City Manager September 11, 2001 Appointment of Members to the General Plan Community Advisory Committee PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council do the following: 1. ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CREATING THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND SETI'ING FORTH THEIR DUTES AND TERMS Appoint the remaining members of the General Plan Community Advisory Committee. BACKGROUND: To assist in the process of updating the General Plan, the City Council approved staff's recommendation regarding the appropriate representative stakeholders for the community advisory committee at its June 12, 2001 meeting. The anticipated role of the Community Advisory Committee is to assist the staff and the consultant in identifying issues; reviewing the goals and policies, and assisting in the development of alternative land use and cimulation plans. The City Council determined that the Committee would be composed of the following: 1 Planning Commissioner 1 Public Traffic Safety Commissioner 1 Community Services Commissioner 1 Representative of the Chamber of Commerce or the Economic Development Council (As determined by the City Council) 1 Representative of a local environmental or community organization (As determined by the City Council) 5 City residents (One appointed by each Council member) R:\GENPLAN\Cornp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\Advisory Committee Appointments CC.doc 1 The Committee representatives from the Public Traffic Safety and Planning Commissions have already been appointed. Their recommended representatives for these Commission's are Darrel Connerton and David Matthewson, respectively. The Community Services Commission is scheduled to be appointed on September 10~h and will be included as part of staff's presentation. To complete the Committee selection process, it is recommended that the City Council appoint one representative from the Chamber of Commerce or Economic Development Council, one representative of a local environmental or community organization and five City residents (one appointed by each Council member) to serve on the CommunityAdvisory Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs associated with this item are included in the FY2001-02 Operating Budget. Attachments 1. Draft Resolution Creating the CommunityAdvisory Committee - Page 3 R:\genpran\comp plan update\communityadvisory committee~advisorycornmittee appointments cc. doc 2 ATTACHMENT 1 DRAFT RESOLUTION CREATING THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\Advisory Committee Appointments CC.doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CREATING THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMI'I-rEE AND SE'FI'lNG FORTH THEIR DUTES AND TERMS WHEREAS, The City of Temecula adopted its first General Plan on November 9, 1993; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that there is a need to review and update the General Plan to ensure its appropriateness and accuracy; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that an advisory committee should be created to assist the staff and the consultant in preparing a revised draft General Plan for the Planning Commission and City Council's consideration; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Establishment. The City Council hereby directs the creation and appointment of a short-term Community Advisory Committee. Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of the Community Advisory Committee is to assist City staff and consultant team in the review of draft documents associated with the General Plan update process to provide community input into the process. Section 3. following: Members. The Community Advisory Committee shall be composed of the B. C. D. E. F. A City Planning Commissioner; A City Public Traffic Safety Commissioner; A City Community Services Commissioner; A member of the Chamber of Commerce or Economic Development Council; A representative of a local environmental or community organization; and, Five City residents, each selected by a member of the City Council. Section 4. follows: Duties. The duties and function of the Community Advisory Committee are as A. Select one of their membership to function as Chairman and another as Vice- Chairman appointed by a majority vote of the Committee. The Chairman (or Vice Chairman in the Chairman's absence) will be responsible for facilitating the meeting discussions and ensuring that all the members of the Committee have an opportunity to participate in a meaningful way. The Chairman will work with the City Staff to ensure that the other duties of the Committee are performed in a timely manner. B. Meet and discuss General Plan related issues at the time and place selected by the Director of Planning. R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\Advisory Commitlee Appointments CC.doc 4 C. Review and provide comments to the Director of Planning on various background reports and studies being prepared as part of the process of updating the City General Plan..Examples of these reports and studies include: background and issue reports, draft goal and policy reports, and alternative land use and circulation plans. Section 5. Term. The Community Advisory Committee shall cease to function or meet when the City Planning Commission begins its consideration of the Draft General Plan, unless the Planning Commission or City Council specifically requests additional input on a particular subject or issue. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of ,2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001 - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on __. day of 2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\Advisory Committee Appointments Ce.doc 5 ITEM 22 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE,~2~ CITY MANAGER ~.~../ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim O' Grady, Assistant City Manager September 11, 2001 Future City Hall Site Selection PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: (1) Appoint an ad-hoc committee to participate in the site selection process for a future City Hall and (2) Provide direction to staff to prepare a Request for Qualification (RFQ) to hire a consultant to lead this selection process BACKGROUND: At the June 26th City Council meeting, Councilmember Pratt requested that the City Council consider a site for a new City Hall. This issue was also discussed on July 10th and at that time, the CityCouncil directed staff to bring back a work plan for further discussion as this project has been recently included in the FY 2002-2006 Capital Improvement Program. Staff has discussed this work plan and is recommending that the City Council appoint an ad-hoc committee to help guide the process. Staff is recommending we hire a consultant to help us identify long-term goals for the community as it relates to a new City Hall, assist in the site selection process, and provide design/cost information on various alternatives. The consultant can also interview councilmembers and select community members to help guide us as we create a vision for the City Hall. The current ClP budget has funds set aside to hire a consultant to perform this work. Therefore, staff is also recommending that the CityCouncil authorize staff to send out the RFQ. FISCAL IMPACT: $75,000 has been approved and is available in the CIP for a preliminary study of this project. ITEM 23 ORAL PRESENTATION