The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About061097 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JUNE 10, 1997- 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of.the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54957,6, Conference.with Cityes LaborNegotiator, Grant ;Yates. 2. §54956.8, Conference with Realproperty:neg0tiator,.Propert¥: 3;09 acres located at the northwesterly corner of La:.Paz. Road and State ~Route79~.APN 922-t~90-25; Negotiating Parties: Mike Moramarco,.County of Riverside and the City of Temecula;'Under negotiation: price and terms of payment. · At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 97-11 Resolution: No. 97-53 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding Prelude Music: Jared Reed Invocation: Reverend Lyle Peterson, Hope Lutheran Church Flag Salute: Councilmember Lindemans ROLL CALL: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS: Proclamation to Chief Jim Wright Presentation by Noon Rotary to City of Temecula Certificate of Appreciation to Noon Rotary Certificate of Appreciation to Jan Weilert Presentation to Albert Crisp Certificate of Commendation to Kyle Kane R:\Agencia~061097 I PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are.limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter no1; listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of May 13, 1997. 2.2 Approve the minutes of May 27, 1997. R:\Agenda~061097 2 3 4 5 Resolution Approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds. Accept Offers of Dedication for Street, Utility and Services Purposes Within Parcel Maps No. 4646 and 28084 for Portions of Zevo Drive. Winchester Road and Reminaton Avenue RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET, UTILITY AND SERVICES PURPOSES WlTH;N PARCEL MAPS NO, 4646 AND 28084 BUT NOT ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-2 (Located at the Northwesterly corner of the Intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 6.2 6.3 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-2; Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security; Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. R:~Agenda\061097 3 7 8 9 10 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System ¢Within Tracts No. 22915-2 and 22915-3) (Located Southwesterly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 22915-2 AND 22915-3) Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-3 (Located at the Southwesterly corner of the Intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-3; 8.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security; 8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Release Warranty and Labor and Materials Bonds in Tract No. 23126 (Located Southerly of the Intersection of Nicolas Road at Roripaugh Road) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders for Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Improvements and the Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 23126; 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 27827-3 (Located Northwesterly of the intersection of North General Kearny Road at Nicolas Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 27827-3; R:~Agenda\061097 4 11 12 13 10.2 Authorize release of Faithful Performance Street and Water and Sewer System Bond amounts, release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, and initiation of the warranty period; 10.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No. 27827-3) (Located Northwesterly of the intersection of Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFOHNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM {WITHIN TRACT NO. 27827-3) "All-Way Stop" - Calle Halcon at Elinda Road RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "ALL-WAY STOP" LOCATION ON CALLE HALCON AND ELINDA ROAD "No Parking" Zones on Rancho California Road, Winchester Road, Pala Road, Santiago Road, Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WINCHESTER ROAD, PALA ROAD, SANTIAGO ROAD, PAUBA ROAD AND RANCHO VISTA ROAD AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A" R:~Agenda\061097 5 14 15 16 17 Award of Construction Contract for Installation of an Interim Traffic Signal at State Route 79 South and Bedford Court RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Award a contract for installation of an interim traffic signal at State Route 79 South and Bedford Court, Project No. PW96-17 to DBX, Inc. in the amount of $89,121.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 14.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $8,912.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. SB 312 - Adding Division 26 to the Water Code Relating to Financing a Flood Control and Prevention Program - Flood Prevention Bond Act of 1998 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING SB 312 - ADDING DIVISION 26 TO THE WATER CODE (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 79000) FLOOD PREVENTION BOND ACT OF 1998 Award a Professional Services Agreement to Urban Design Studio to prepare the Southside Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $61,700.00 to Urban Design Studio to prepare the Southside Specific Plan and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Authorization to Execute Agreements for the Use of 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreements for the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds. 17.2 Authorize the City Manager to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements with the Emergency Food and Aid Program (Senior Center), the Parent Center, and Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP Tots) for administration of the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds, R:\Agen~a~061097 6 18 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-10 RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5 BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR TM 23100, 23101, 23103 AND TPM 28503, WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0030) RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING AND THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING R:\Agen~a~061097 7 TEMECULA COMMUNITY.SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 97-01 Resolution: No. CSD 97-07 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Spsakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item no1; listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and sta_te your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 27, 1997. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: June 24, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda~061097 8 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY'MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 97-01 ~' Resolution: No. RDA 97-04 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Steven J. Ford presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on it.~ms that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 27, 1997. Contract Amendment No. 3, Project No. PW95-07. Professional Services with Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. for the Design of Phase I and Phase II of the Western Bypass Corridor, Purchase Order 17136 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 3 and authorize Chairperson to execute the Amendment between the City and Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $60,935.00 brining the total contract amount to $552,203.60. The Agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form. R:\Agenda~061097 9 3 Award of a Professional Services Contract to Westcott and McGregor and Associates for Property Management of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $1,600 per month to West~tt and McGregor and Associates for property management, operation and maintenance of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments. 3.2 Authorize RDA Chairperson to Execute Contract. AGENCY BUSINESS 4 FY 1997/98 Economic Development Strategic Plan RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Review the FY 1997/98 Economic Development Strategic Plan update; 4.2 Review and approve the FY 1997/98 Marketing Plan; 4.3 Review and provide direction regarding the funding request of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation and the Temecula Valley Film Council. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: June 24, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\061097 10 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at-the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 19 Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) - Shell Automobile Service Station, Car Wash, Convenience Mart, and a Kentucky Fried Chicken Fast Food Restaurant, at the Southwest Corner of Margarita Road and Yukon. within the Palomar Village Shopping Center RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0345; 19.2 Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0345; 19.3 Adopt a resolution entitled.: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 96-0345 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSlON'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 648 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH, A 875 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE MART (WITHOUT ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES), AND A 1,645 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH SERVICE ON 0.794 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND YUKON, WITHIN THE PALOMAR VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-700-017 COUNCIL BUSINESS 20 Planning Commission Appointments RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Appoint two applicants to serve a full three-year term on the Planning Commission. R:tAgenda\061097 11 21 Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DIAZ ROAD 2) PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY 3) DIAZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD 4) RANCHO VISTA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY 22 Request for Annexation of Redhawk by the Redhawk Residents to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District ITCSD) RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Provide direction to staff regarding the annexation for Redhawk and Vail Ranch communities, and if appropriate waive City pre-zoning, annexation and CEQA fees, and to pay all Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) annexation fees. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: June 24, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Char~bers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\061097 12 'PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS City of PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, J~me~ M. Wright h~ b~ a Ri. er~i~ C. oun~ fibfighter for mo~ 20 year~; WHISREAS, Chief WriSt served as the City's Division Chief under the terms of the City of Temecula's Fire Services Contract, Operations Chief for the Riverside County Fire Department, and Acting Riverside County Fire Chief; and WHEREAS, Chief WriSt performed all of these duties with a high de~ree of professionalism and enthuaiaam; and WHEREAS, J~-,e, M. Wright has recendy been promoted to the po~itio,~ of Chief of the Riverside County Fire Department; NOW, TI-~REFORE, I, Patricia H. Birdsall, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, extend our congratulations and wish continued success to Riverside County Fire Chief James M. Wright in his new position. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 10th &y of June, 1997. Patricia H. Bi~all, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Presented in appreciation and gratitude on behalf of the citizens of the City of Temecula To~ This expression of the eommunity's esteem serves to acknowledge the Noon Rotary's instrumental role in enabling the City of Temecula to acquire the CairnsIRIS Helmet. Your fundraising efforts towards the purchase of this mounted thermal imaging system are deeply appreciated. 'Because of your dedication to this endeavor, the capability to expedite rescues in a smoke-filled environment became a reality. The citizens of Temecula, the Temecula Fire Department, and the City Council wish to thank you for your benevolence and consideration. 'In V¥itness Whereof, ][ have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 10th day of June, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Cerfificate Apprecia6on Presented in appreciation and gratitude on behalf of the citizens of the City of Temecula To.' This expression of the community's esteem serves to acknowledge your insight and inspiration in bringing the CairnsIPd$ ,Helmet to the City's attention. Your generous ~.ontribution of $5,000.00 towards the purchase of the ]Helmet is deeply appreciated. Because of your resourcefulness and perception in realizing that the City of Temecula would benefit greatly by acquiring the mounted ther,,,al ima~,,g system, the capability to expedite rescues in a smoke-filled environment became a reality. The citizens of Temecula, the Temecula Fire Depart,nent, and the City Council wish to thank you for your generosity and concern. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto affized my hand and official seal this 1Oth day of $une, 1997. Patricia ,H. Birdsall, N[ayor $une S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk ITEM' 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MAY 13, 1997 EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to adjourn to Executive Session at 5:37 PM, pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54957.6, Conference with City's Labor Negotiator, Grant Yates. 2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: 27600 Jefferson Avenue; Negotiating Parties: Norm Reeves Super Group and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula; Under negotiation: Consideration of lease terms. 3. §54956.9(a), Pending Litigation: a. Strachota Insurance Agency v. City of Temecula, et al. b. Stratego v. City of Temecula, et al. c. Zonos v. City of Temecula, et al. 4. §54956.9(b), Whether to initiate litigation, one matter. The motion was unanimously carried. The Executive Session was adjourned at 7:10 PM. A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:11 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk Susan Jones. PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude and intermission music was provided by Kurt Jordan. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor James Field, First Baptist Church of Temecula. R:\Agenda~051397 1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Mayor Birdsall proclaimed May 14, 1997, as Transit Appreciation Day CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson stated the City Council did not discuss Item No. 2 and on Item 1, the City Council met with Mr. Grant Yates, but there is no final action to report, and in accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, there is nothing else to report from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Art Pelke, 43185 Margarita Road, extended appreciation to the Council from many Temecula organizations for prohibiting alcoholic and tobacco sales at the proposed Pauba and Margarita Roads strip mall. Don Jenkins, 30315 Rogue Circle, thanked the City Council for their support in helping to defray the expenses for Sean McClintock, who was injured in a bicycle accident while on a scouting trip. Mr. Jenkins announced a Bike-a-Thon, tentatively scheduled for August 23, 1997, to help defray medical expenses for injured bicyclists with inadequate medical coverage. Sean McClintock also expressed his thanks to the various Temecula and Murrieta businesses for their support. Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico Road, asked the City Council to make a comprehensive review of the general plan with the build-out capped at a reasonable number. Chuck Washington, Councilmember, City of Murrieta, urged support of a resolution adopting a restructuring of the Riverside County Transportation Commission. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Pro Tern Roberts asked that the Notice of Hearing signs at Pauba Road and Margarita Road be removed immediately. Mayor Birdsall asked the City Attorney if she could participate in Item 25, as she had watched the video and listened to the audio tapes of the May 8, 1997 workshop. City Attorney Thorson replied she could participate. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Pro Tern Roberts requested the removal of Item 5 from the Consent Calendar and asked staff to research if the Old Town Main Street Billboard Association was double billed. R:\Agenda\051397 2 Councilmember Ford requested the removal of Item 18 from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4, 6-17 and 19-21. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. 2.2 Approve the minutes of April 22, 1997. Resolution ADoroving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Citv Treasurer's Report as of March 31. 1997 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1997. 3 4 R:\Agencla\051397 3 6 7 8 Authorize Access to Parcel 1 in Parcel Map No. 21451 from Santiago Road (Located on the Northerly side of Santiago Road Westerly of Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve a new driveway location access opening fronting on Santiago Road Westerly of Margarita Road; 6.2 Authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the preparation of an agreement wherein the applicants shall cluitclaim their rights in an offsite access opening, and shall agree to physically close their existing driveway. Agreement shall be satisfactory to the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to recordation of the agreement. Release Faithful Performance Warranty, and Labor and Materials Bonds in Tract No. 20703- _2 (Located Easterly of the intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2; 7.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer and Surety. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 20703-3 (Located Southeasterly of Winchester Road and Southwesterly of Nicolas Road) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders and Labor and Material Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-3; 8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer and Surety. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6 (Located Southwesterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6; 9.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, Water, and Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security; R:~Agencla\051397 4 10 11 12 9.3 Accept substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials; 9.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F (Located Southwesterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F; 10.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, Water, and Sewer security amounts to warranty level, and release of the Subdivision Monument Bond; 10.3 Accept substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials; 10.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 22962 (Located Southeasterly of Winchester Road and Southwesterly of Nicolas Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water, and Sewer Improvements in Tract No. 22962; 11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer and Surety. Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Securities in Tract No. 23142 (Located Northeasterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho California Road) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Faithful Performance, Labor, and Materials securities for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 23142; 12.2 Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials securities on file; 12.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. R:\Agen(ta\051397 5 13 14 15 Substitute Subdivision Improvement Acjreement and Public Imorovement Bonds in Tract No. 23992 (Located Southerly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Ynez Road) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Faithful Performance, Labor, and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer System improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation and Traffic Signalization Mitigation Bonds in Tract No. 23992; 13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developers and Sureties. Acceptance of the Grant of a Drainage Easement over a Portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Mal~ No. 22554, abutting Tract No. 20879-F (Located north of Rancho California Road and east of Meadows Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF A STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 22554, ABUTTING TRACT NO. 20879-F Acceptance of Public Streets into the CitvoMaintained Street System (Within Tracts No. 21675-5 and 21675-F (Located Westerly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21675-6 AND 21675-F) R:\Agenda~051397 6 16 17 19 Award of Construction Contract for the FY96-97 Street StriDing Program. Proiect No. PW97-01 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 16.2 Award a contract for Project No. PW97-01, FY96-97 Street Striping Program, to Pacific Striping, Inc. for $76,685.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,668.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside Countv Habitat Conservation Agency RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve an Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-05 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010{d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, (2) DEL REY ROAD AND VIA NORTE, (3) MORAGA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA AND MARGARITA ROAD, {4) MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH, JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTH CITY LIMITS R:\Agenda\051397 7 20 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-06 21 5 RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(a1 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE 1 OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW 'FORTUNE TELLING, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY' AS PERMITTED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-07 RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION 9.02.010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND AMENDING SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES Authorize Access to Lot 28 in Tract No. 9833-1 from Margarita Road (Located on the Westerly side of Margarita Road Southerly of Pio Pico Road) Director of Public Works Joseph Kicak presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated his opposition based on the driveway location. Mayor Birdsall inquired about moving the driveway further up on the property. R:~Agenda\051397 8 18 It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, and seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff's recommendation with the modification to relocate access as far north as possible, adjacent to the channel, and to restrict the northerly landscaping on Margarita Road to a low level or set back from curb face to increase sight distance. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize driveway access to Lot 28 in Tract No. 9833-1 from Margarita Road by permitting an exception to the abutters access rights dedicated to and accepted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors' approval of the final Tract Map; 5.2 Authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the preparation of an agreement wherein the applicants shall quitclaim their rights to access from Pio Pico Road. Agreement shall be satisfactory to the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to recordation of the agreement. The motion was unanimously carried. Official Pageant Recognition Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report and introduced Alice Sullivan, Director of the Chamber of Commerce. Ms. Sullivan reported on activities in which the representatives participate. Councilmember Lindemans inquired into any liability issues. City Attorney Thorson stated their activities as representatives will be handled in the same manner as other Parks and Recreation projects. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts to approve staff's recommendation. 18.1 Recognize the Temecula Valley Pageant Title Holders as Official Representatives of the City of Temecula. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Stone, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Linderoans R:\Agencla\051397 9 JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, OLD TOWN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AND THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY Chairperson Steven J. Ford called the Temecula Redevelopment Agency to order; Chairperson Karel F. Linderoans called the Old Town Community Facilities District Financing Authority and the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority to order at 7:47 PM. Agency Member Stone stepped down due to conflict of interest. PUBLIC HEARING 1 AB 1290 Redevelooment Im!;)lementstion Plen Status Report Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. Streetscape Improvements Maintenance Costs Director Birdsall asked about the location of the wooden sidewalks and if the $100,000 annual cost included maintenance of the restrooms and trash. Mr. Meyer replied the wooden sidewalks will run along Front Street from 6th Street to Santiago Road and the cost for maintenance is included. Director Birdsall suggested the City allocate the funds from the City's budget for the first year. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Director Roberts to include, upon project completion, the streetscape improvements maintenance costs in the City's budget as a line item, to be reviewed on an annual basis. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemarts, Roberts, Ford NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSTAIN: 1 DIRECTORS: Stone Facade Improvement Prooram Director Birdsall clarified this program is exempt from prevailing wages. R:~Agenda\051397 10 It was moved by Director Lindemans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Add a $10,000 Assistance Package, from now through June 31, 1998. The terms of the package would be a $5,000 grant with a $5,000 loan forgiven at the end of five years. Staff recommends that applicants be encouraged to use the loan, rebate, and assistance programs concurrently. Staff also recommends that the terms of the rebate program be modified to allow direct payment to the contractor similar to our Residential Rehab Programs. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSTAIN: I DIRECTORS: Stone Streetscape Construction Mitigation Program It was moved by Director Lindemans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Direct staff to develop a mitigation program which will assist the Old Town Merchants to mitigate some of the temporary adverse impacts that are expected to be experienced during the construction period. The motion was carried with Director Stone abstaining. Redevelopment Small Business Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff recommendation to eliminate this program. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone R:~Agenda\051397 11 AGENCY/AUTHORITY BUSINESS 2 Old Town Temecula Entertainment Proiect. Termination of Owner Participation Agreement. Fluor Daniel Construction Management A0reement. and Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District No. 1 It was moved by Director Linderoans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff recommendation 2.1. 2.1 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN 'OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND T.Z.B.G., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION," DATED AUGUST 31, 1995, AS AMENDED MARCH 25, 1996 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone It was moved by Director Lindemans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff recommendation 2.2. 2.2 That the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 97-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN "CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION AGREEMENT," DATED NOVEMBER 26, 1996 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall None R:\Agenda\051397 12 ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone It was moved by Director Linderoans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff recommendation 2.3. 2.3 That the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 97-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DISSOLVING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone Chairperson Ford recessed the Joint Meeting of the City Council, Temecula Redevelopment, Old Town/Westside Community facilities District Financing Authority and the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority meeting. Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 8:19 PM and reconvened the meeting at 8:33 PM. Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 8:33 PM to accommodate the scheduled Community Services District, Temecula Redevelopment Agency, Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, and Old Town Westside Improvement Authority meetings. The meeting was reconvened at 8:52 PM. COUNCIL BUSINESS 22 TCI Cable Presentation Kathy Olett, local manager of TCI Cable, provided an update of TCI operations, future plans, and a rate increase effective June 1, 1997. She introduced Teri Scott, Director of Governmental Affairs, and Stacy Kelly, Director of Regulatory Affairs. Ms. Scott reported programming and service decisions will now be made at the local level. Commissioner Ford asked how local channels and different programming could be added. Ms. Olett stated existing contracts with affiliates, band width capacities, and survey data determine programming. R;~Agenda\051397 13 23 24 25 Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he has noticed improvement and commented his concern is receiving at least one San Diego station. Barbara Nolan, 27430 Senna Court, expressed her displeasure with TCI's service and programming selections and asked the Council to consider alternatives to TCI. Mayor Birdsall received and filed the report. Prima Facia Speed Limits on Certain Streets - Mira Loma Drive North of Rancho Vista Road. Cabrillo Avenue between Jedediah Smith Road and Vallejo Avenue Director of Public Works Joseph Kicak presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 23.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010{d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) MIRA LOMA DRIVE NORTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD {2) CABRILLO AVENUE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND VALLEJO AVENUE The motion was unanimously carried. Proposed Reorganization of RCTC Mayor Pro Tam Roberts presented the staff report. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 24.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The motion was unanimously carried. Development Impact Fees City Manager Ronald Bradley presented the staff report. R:~Agenda\051397 14 Mayor Birdsall announced she had reviewed the video tapes and listened to the audio tapes of the May 8, 1997 workshop. Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:30 PM. Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico Road, asked the Council to reconsider and approve staff's recommended DIF fees. Cecelia Axton, 30169 Sierra Madre Drive, spoke in favor of staff's recommended fees. Monte McLain, 36147 Vence Drive, Murrieta, opposed reducing development impact fees below staff's recommendation. Gordon Greer, 45077 Putting Green Court, spoke in favor of staff's recommended fee structure. George Buhler, 40265 Paseo Sereno, asked the Council to follow staff's recommended fees. Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, expressed his support of staff's recommendation regarding impact fees. David Michael, 30300 Churchill Court, stated developers must pay for the infrastructure costs required by their businesses. AI Theurich, 30533 Bridgeview Circle, stated the creation of jobs will increase traffic problems, if proper mitigation does not take place. Bob Johnston, 29760 Valle Verde, requested Council reconsider their decision to reduce DIF fees. Gartwood Lacour, 40680 Calle Madero, stated his opposition to lowering staff's recommended DIF fees. Bill Dendy, 41975 Winchester Road, representing Westside Business Center, stated his support of the Council's fee structure approved at the May 8, 1997 meeting. Lon Brusegard, 42075 Avenida Alvarado, representing Southwest Riverside County Manufacturer's Council, stated jobs are not antiproductive because even though the employees may live outside the area, they use various local businesses. He expressed the real need is for a north/south corridor - i.e., Diaz Road expansion. Michael Naggar, 43034 Agena Street, stated his opposition to lowering DIF fees. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, and seconded by Councilmember Stone to extend the meeting for one hour. Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 10:19 PM. R:\Agencla\O51397 15 Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 10:19 PM and reconvened the meeting at 10:19 PM. Councilmember Stone expressed his concern over too many projects and not enough revenue and believes the fees are too low as the Council has the developmental fee reduction capability to create incentives to bring jobs, which also bring property and sale tax revenue, into this community. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts displayed SCAG projections showing projected Temecula population increasing by 18% by 2020, and employment, 12% while Orange County employment increases substantially. He mentioned a Vehicle Tax is being considered because of gas tax loss which will effect the 62.8% of people living in Temecula who commute. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Ford, to extend the meeting to 11:30 PM. The motion was carried with Councilmember Lindemans voting no. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to approve staff's recommendation of the proposed fee to be phased in over a seven (7) year period; the fee will be adjust ed July I of each year after staff has provided an analysis of development which has occurred and the amount of fees collected to determine appropriate fees for the next fiscal year. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Councilmember Ford to include the sphere of influence and the residential fee will be adopted at 100% of the maximum fee recommended by the study. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None R:~Agenda~051397 16 25.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER ENTITLED 'PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE' 25.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AND IMPOSING A PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mr. Bradley stated with the adoption of the residential fees, it is still intended to give up to 50% credit for development of private parks. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts asked if staff has a recommended definition for a qualified non- profit organization. Mr. Bradley replied that issue is taking time to research and will be brought back at a later date. Assistant City Attorney Reuben Weiner stated if a non profit organization constructed a non-residential building they would not pay fee until the property is transferred to a for-profit organization. Mayor Birdsall questioned how the 70 plus people who have paid $10,000 will be handled. Mr. Bradley responded staff will come back to the Council with a recommendation. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. R:~A§encla\051397 17 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to adjourn at 11:16 PM to a meeting on May 27, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California and a CIP Workshop will be held June 3, 1997, 6:30 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk R:\Agendat051397 18 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MAY 27, 1997 EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adjourn to Executive Session at 5:30 PM, pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54957.6, Conference with City's Labor Negotiator, Grant Yates. 2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: 3.09 acres located at the northwesterly corner of La Paz Road and State Route 79, APN 922-190-25; Negotiating Parties: Mike Moramarco, County of Riverside and the City of Temecula; Under negotiation: price and terms of payment. 3. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: 27600 Jefferson Avenue; Negotiating Parties: Norm Reeves Super Group and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula; Under negotiation: Consideration of lease terms. The motion was unanimously carried. The Executive Session was adjourned at 7:10 PM. A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called or order at 7:13 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Birdsall presiding. Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk Susan W. Jones. PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude and intermission music was provided by Heather Downing. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Rabbi Josef Germain, Congregation B'Nai Chaim of Murrieta. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCF The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Stone. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson stated in accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, there was nothing to report from Closed Session. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts presented Randall Holland, Vice President of the Arts Council, with a proclamation declaring the week of June 1, 1997, to be "Arts Appreciation Week." Mayor Birdsall proclaimed May 27, 1997, to be "World Trade Day." Jim Morrisey, Director of the Inland Empire American Planning Association, presented Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske an award for the Planning Department's Fast Track Process. Community Development Director Gary Thornhill also recognized Mary Jane McLarney, Tony Elmo, Ron Parks, Annie Bostre-Le, Heida Osvold, Laura Cabral, Matthew Fagan, Carole Donahoe, an_d Larry Cooley for their contribution in making the fast track process a success. Mr. Morrisey presented the Temecula One Award (Operation Neighborhood Enrichment) to Senior Planner John Meyer. Mr. Thornhill also thanked Mary Jane McLarney, Dave Haar, Mike Teyechea, Mary Ann Salazar, Tony Elmo, Shawn Nelson, Irene Rogers, and All Moghadam. Mr. Morrisey awarded Associate Planner Matthew Fagan the "Robert Street Memorial Award" for his hard work, excellent skills and contribution to the Planning Department. Mr. Fagan expressed his appreciation for the award and for the assistance and encouragement given him by his wife, Planning Department staff members, the Planning Commission, and the City Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS Terry Gilmore, 2685 Ynez Road, asked for donations and prayers for two-year old Allison Sanchez, who has brain cancer and stated donations can be dropped off at Paradise Chevrolet, with checks made payable to "People Helping People." Joanie Sanchez, Allison's mother, thanked the community for their support and prayers and reported they will be going to Sacramento for surgery to remove the remainder of the tumor. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, reported many car dealerships are unloading cars in the median of Ynez Road and requested proper enforcement of City codes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Stone discussed the massage ordinance which will be on the June 24, 1997 agenda and asked for Council support regarding active enforcement of the existing ordinance in the areas of working hours, certification of employees, inspection of premises and apparel requirements. Councilmember Stone thanked Joe Kicak and the Public Works Department for the installation of guard rail on the south side of Pauba Road. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Roberts requested the removal of Item 4 from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Ford requested Item 14 be removed from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Linderoans, to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-3, 5-13, and 15-20. The motion carried as follows: 2 3 AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall None None 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of May B, 1997. Resolution Approving List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-2 (Located at the Northerly corner of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) 5.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-2; 5.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amount to the warranty level for Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements, initiation on the one-year warranty period and release of the Subdivision Monument Bond; 5.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 7 8 9 Accept Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 24134-1 (Located Southeasterly of the intersection of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) 6.1 Accept the Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 24134-1; 6.2 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation security; 6.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-3 (Located at the Northwesterly corner of the intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road) 7.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-3; 7.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street and Drainage, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security; 7.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Amendment No. 1 to the Electrical Agreement for Maintenance of Sional and Lighting Systems on State Highways 8.1 Approve an Amendment No. 1 to the Electrical Agreement for Maintenance of Signal and Lighting Systems on State Highways with the State Department of Transportation. Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No. 2271 6-23 (Located Northerly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 22716-2) 4 10 11 12 13 15 16 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No, 22916-3) (Located at the Northwesterly corner of the intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road) 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 22916-3) Acceptance of Sewer Easements Within Lots 27 and 28 - Tract No. 21067 (Located adjacent to Pala Road Community Park) 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF SEWER EASEMENTS WITHIN LOTS 27 AND 28 OF TRACT NO. 21067 11.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the Grant of Easement Documents. Revisions to City of Temecula Travel Policy 12.1 Approve the revised City of Temecula Travel Policy. Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1997 13.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of March 31, 1997, the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1997. Contract Inspection Services for Building and Safety 15.1 Approve an additional payment in the amount of $11,21 5 to J.A.S. Pacific Consulting Services, Inc., to provide building inspection services to the Building and Safety Department. Local Government Subvention Fund Match Program 16.1 Authorize projects proposed to be constructed using AB2766 Subvention Funds Match {20%) and other funds provided by the City (80%); 17 18 19 2O 16.2 Commit the City to the Project Milestone Schedules reflected in the application package; 16.3 Allocate AB2766 Subvention Funds and other funds to the proposed projects; 16.4 Authorize the Mayor to execute two {2) copies of the contract provided in the application package. Selection of Vendor and ADiDroDriation of Grant Funds 17.1 Appropriate $45,525 to purchase a command post trailer for Police Department use from Universal Specialty Vehicles in Riverside, California. David Turch and Associates 18.1 Retain the public advocacy firm of David Turch and Associates to assist the City in pursuing federal funding opportunities for infrastructure needs. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-08 19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010{d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON {1) MIRA LOMA DRIVE NORTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD {2) CABRILLO AVENUE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND VALLEJO AVENUE Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-09 20.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER ENTITLED 'PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE" The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Linderoans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 4 14 Professional Services Contract with Canty Engineering Group. Inc.. for Design and Construction Support Services for the Winchester Roadll-1 5 Interchange, Rancho California Road/I-1 5 Interchange. and the Overland Overcrossing Bridge Councilmember Roberts expressed concern with the selection of an engineering company whose principals were involved with the previous contracted firm, and recommended language regarding payment for additional services and authorization of additional work. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone, to approve staff's recommendation with the following amendments: 1) Page 1, Section (b), "Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and manner as agreed to by the City Manager, the Council's Public Works Subcommittee and the Consultant..."; and 2) "Any additional work shall be approved by the City Council." 4.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Canty Engineering Group, Inc. (CEG) to provide engineering and construction support services for the Winchester Road/I-15 Interchange, Project No. PW95-21, Rancho California Road/I-15 Interchange, Project No. PW95-12 and Overland Overcrossing Bridge, Project No. PW95-11, in an amount not to exceed $54,000.00. The motion was carried unanimously. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Tom Dodson and Associates to Perform Services to Administer and Implement the Mitigation Monitoring Programs for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan Fnvironmental Imoact Report and the Campos Verdes Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report City Manager Bradley reported there was a question about the awarding of this contract because of line items not identified on page 4 of a letter dated March 22, 1997, submitted by the proposed consultant. He stated the wording, which was blacked out by staff because it was not appropriate for this contract, reads, "Item 4 of the duties you identified in the request address additional tasks which may be required. If requested, TDA can provide a proposal to assist the City with securing an archeologist and/or a paleontologist for monitoring activities Nos. 31 and 32." Mr. Bradley reiterated these contracts for the regional shopping center and the middle school site are paid by Forest City and Countryside Community Southwest; and both contracts must be in place before grading permits can be pulled. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts, to approve staff recommendation. 14.1 Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $30,000 to Tom Dodson and Associates to perform services to administer and implement the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreements after the initial funding deposits have been made. 7 14.2 Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $30,000 to Tom Dodson and Associates to perform services to administer and implement the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Campos Verdes Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreements after the initial funding deposits have been made. The motion was unanimously passed. JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. TI=MECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OLD TOWN COMMUNITY FAClLITIFS DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AND THF OLD TOWN WFSTSlDF IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY A joint meeting of the City Council, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, the Old Town Community Facilities District Financing Authority and the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority was called at 8:13 PM. Chairman Ford of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency presiding. Councilmember Stone stepped down due to a conflict of interest. 1 Financing for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts, to approve staff recommendation. 1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AND THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY 1.2 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 96-55 TO ALLOW FOR IMMEDIATE ABANDONMENT OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS 8 1.3 1.4 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AND THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY That the Board of Directors adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 97-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE OLD T. OWN/WESTSlDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DISSOLVING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) The motion carried as follows: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Ford None None Stone It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts, to recess the Joint City Council/Temecula Redevelopment Agency at 8:15 PM to accommodate the scheduled Community Services District, Redevelopment Agency, Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority and Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority meetings. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Stone abstaining. A joint meeting of the City Council and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was reconvened at 8:57 PM. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 Amscan Inc. Owner Participation Agreement Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:00 PM, and hearing no requests to speak, closed the public hearing at 9:00 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to approve staff recommendation as follows: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND AMSCAN INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION 3.2 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND AMSCAN INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION The motion carried unanimously. Mayor Birdsall recessed the City Council portion of the meeting at 9:01 PM and the City Council meeting was reconvened at 9:08 PM. PUBLIC HEARINGS 21 Planning Application No, PA97-0030 Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 5 for Portions of TM 23100, TM 23101, TM 23103 and TPM 28503. within Specific Plan No. 1 99 Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:15 PM. Brian Johnson, 23333 Avenida la Ceiza, Coto de Ceiza, representing the applicant, stated he concurred with the staff report and was available for any questions. Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 9:16 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to approve staff recommendation 21.1. 21.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0030. The motion was carried unanimously. l0 City Attorney Thorson clarified that Sections 11.2, 11.3, and 11.4 of the agreement are deleted and Development Agreement Section 12.2 and Section A will be revised. Mr. Johnson stated he was in agreement with Mr. Thorson's revisions and also noted the term "Interim Public Facilities" appeared throughout the documents and asked that term be revised. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to approve staff recommendation with the following modifications: 1) Delete Sections 11.2_, 11.3 and 11.4; 2) change term "Interim Public Facilities Fee" to Public Facility Fee"; 3) Amend Section 12.2 "Public Facility Fee" to read as follows: (a) In lieu of the county Development Agreement Fee, RSA Fee or City Public Facility Fee, Owner shall pay Public Facility Fee of Three Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety Dollars ($3,590.00) per dwelling unit inclusive of Street Improvement Fees, Traffic Signalization Fees, Fire Protection Fees, Parks and Recreation Fees and Library Fees. The Public Facility Fee shall be paid as provided in Section 12.3 below." 21.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5 BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR TM 23100, 23101, 23103 AND TPM 28503, WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0030) The motion was carried unanimously. COUNCIL BUSINESS 22 Award of Professional Services Agreement for Weed Abatement Services Jim Barron, County Fire Department, introduced Captain Brad Harris, Riverside County Fire Department Hazard Reduction Manager, who made a presentation on the importance of week abatement and providing defensible space around homes. Mayor Birdsall requested the Planning Department have available for landscape architects and developers, a list of low fire intolerant plants for this area. Mr. Thornhill stated the City's landscape architect will review and comment on appropriate plants when there is an interfacial issue with wildlands. Chief Building Official Anthony Elmo presented the staff report. Councilmember Stone asked if actual liens on forced abatement would come to the Council or be handled administratively. Mr. Elmo replied the special assessment that go on county records will be brought to the City Council for approval. Mayor Birdsall suggested the posted notice state the amount of time the property owner will be given to clear his property, plus the dollar amount Fire Protection Services would charge to abate the property. Mayor Birdsall asked if Fire Protection Services would be allowed to contract for weed abatement as an independent, while under contract with the City. Senior Building Official Tony Elmo replied there are two conditions that apply to the conflict of interest issue: 1) once the agreement is signed, the contractor cannot contract independently for weed abatement services in the City; 2) any forced abatement recommendations must come to staff for authorization prior to the abatement work being done by the contractor. Councilmember Stone expressed concern about property owner notification. Mr. Elmo replied at the time of inspection, the property will be physically posted and a certified notification letter sent to the property owner which will state the City can provide a list of contractors available to do the weed abatement. Mayor Birdsall inquired about property owners being required to clear 30' beyond their property line. Mr. Elmo stated clearing beyond one's property line may be dictated by individual CC&R's. City Attorney Thorson pointed out the scope of work states the process the contractor has to follow to notify property owners of a potential problem. He further stated the agreement specifies the contractor cannot undertake any forced abatement without the prior written authorization of the Director of Building and Safety. Ken Osborne, President of Fire Protection Services, explained the process Fire Protection Services will follow before doing any abatement work. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Stone, to approve staff's recommendation. 22.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement, for Weed Abatement Services, with Fire Protection Services, Inc. The motion was carried unanimously. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adjourn at 10:00 PM to a CIP Workshop, June 3, 1997, 6:30 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The next regular City Council meeting is to be held June 10, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk ITEM-.3 RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXI:HRIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF.,CULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,330,336.51 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 10th day of tune, 1997. ATYEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] P~so~ 137 I STATE OF CAIJgORNIA) COUNTY OF R/VERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEM]ECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 10th day of June, 1997 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMFaMB~: Ford, Lindemarts, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCK,MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMg-MBERS: None June $. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Resos 137 2 crFYOF TEMECULA UST OF DEMANDS CEV2:2/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05~9/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/30/g7 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/10/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/15/97 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 06110197 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL $ 452,441.16 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 5,676.50 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 38,726.87 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 65,610.05 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 10,233.55 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 57.86 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 22,422.25 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 396.50 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (ClP) 402,481.18 280 RDA-CIP 162,261.12 300 INSURANCE 2,384.84 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 19,622.58 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 387.67 '0 FACILITIES 3,159.39 $ 483,939.79 126,985.8~ 358,054.76 216,881.24 144,474.89 $ 1,330,338.51 1,185,861.62 PAYROLL: 00~ GENERAL $ 99,670.45 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 2,144.49 190 TCS D 27.568.63 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 67.59 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 159.96 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,580.06 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,042.65 280 RDA-CIP 3,632.80 300 INSURANCE 643.18 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,071.96 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 791.12 340 FACILITIES 3,092.00 TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY THERESA4~VAREZ, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST ., GENIE ROB~ERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER 144,474.89 1,330,336.51 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. . HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 05/22/97 13:20 CiTY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 165 RDA DEV- LO~/MO0 SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROd FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES AMOUNT 27,958.50 5,676.50 37,858.00 7,598.10 7,668.88 219.08 260,958.64 148,619.09 2,069.79 5,108.88 121.00 283.53 TOTAL 483,939.79 'RE2 /97 13:20 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 122241 05/19/97 002811 970521 05/21/97 002811 43498 05/22/97 0007"24 43499 05/22/97 001104 43500 05/22/97 43501 05/22/97 002785 43501 05/22/97 002785 43502 05/22/97 43503 05/22/97 002194 43504 05/22/97 000101 43505 05/22/97 ,6 05/22/97 43507 05/22/97 43508 05/22/97 001260 43509 05/22/97 001054 43509 05/22/97 001054 43509 05/22/97 001054 43510 05/22/97 002803 43511 05/22/97 000131 43511 05/22/97 000131 43512 05/22/97 000135 43513 05/22/97 000462 43514 05/22/97 000146 43515 05/22/97 43516 05/22/97 000155 43517 05/22/97 001669 43517 05/22/97 001669 '7 05/22/97 001669 ~ 05/22/97 001669 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR NAME SUNRISE ESCRO~ SUNRISE ESCRO~ A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI A R M A INTERNATIONAL AEW/LBA ACQUISITION ALL STATE POLICE SUPPLY ALL STATE POLICE SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES TO OOMESTI AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. APPLE ONE, INC. BEAL, KELLI 001950 BECHTEL MAINTENANCE SER BELL, MARILYN CPRS CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF CALI FORN IA BUILD ING OFF CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CLUB, THE COUNTS UNLIMITED DANNECKER, LINDA DAVL I N DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO ITEM DESCRIPTION 1ST TIME BYER-OLIVEROS,R~JqIRO 1ST TIME HOMEBUYER-BEOF BASKETBALL UNIFORMS MEMBERSHIP:G.FLORES 97 REFUND: OVERCNARGED/LD97-O17GR MISC SUPPLIES-SUB STATION TAX REG:R.ROBERTS 5/31 FUND RAISER MEMBERSHIP:FAGAN,MATT 0?9309 TEMP HELP W/E 5/3 J.COMYNS REIMB:SIERRA CF:4/30-5/l:BEAL EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING REFUND: EARLY TUMBLERS TRN:AMAVISCA:REC.LEAD.TRN:6/07 SEMINAR:POST DISASTER:6 REGIST SEM:POST DISASTER 6/11CUMMING SEM:POST DISASTER 6/11 CABPAL STRIPING EXHIBITS/WINCH,R.CA. CLAIM SERVICES FOR APRIL CREDIT: BILLED TWICE MATERIAL SUPPLIES-STREET SIGNS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TRAFFIC COUNT CENSUS PROGRAM REFUND:MOOELING WITH FIMO TAPING OF COUNCIL MTG-5/13 CREDIT: RETURNED SUPPLIES PAINT SUPPLY-GRAFFITI REMOVAL PAINT SUPPLY-GRAFFITI REMOVAL DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO PAINT SUPPLY-GRAFFITI REMOVAL ACCOUNT NUNBER 165-199-999-5449 165-199-999-5449 190-18~-999-5380 001-120-999-5277 120-199-4230 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-100-999-5260 001-161-999-5226 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5261 340-199-701-5212 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5261 001-162-999-5261 001-171-999-5261 001-171-999-5261 001-164-604-5250 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 001-164-601-5244 190-18~-999-5330 001-164-602-5406 190-183-4982 001-100-999-5250 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 18,867.00 18,991.00 240.45 145.00 5,676.50 920.00 71.30 40.00 263.00 180.60 49.28 250.00 46.00 60.00 510.00 85.00 85.00 560.00 2,797.29 727.50- 27.02 468.00 800.00 12.00 810.88 52.13- 158.03 66.27 74.41 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 18,867.00 18,~1.00 240.45 145.00 5,676.50 991.30 40.00 263.00 180.60 49.28 250.00 46.00 60.00 680.00 560.00 2,069.79 27.02 468.00 800.00 12.00 810.88 246.58 VOUCHRE2 O5/22/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43518 43518 43518 43518 43518 43518 43518 43518 43518 43518 43518 43519 43520 43520 43521 43521 43521 43521 43522 43522 43522 43522 43523 43524 43524 43525 43526 43527 43528 43529 43530 43530 43531 43532 43532 43532 43532 13:20 CHECK DATE 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 VENDOR NUMBER 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 000523 002128 002128 000517 000517 000517 000517 002060 0O2O6O 002060 002060 002809 000165 000165 001135 002560 000184 002141 002141 000481 000177 000177 000177 000177 VENDOR NAME ES ES ES ES E S ES ES E S ES ES ES EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMEHT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC ENPLOYMENT SERVIC EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER ENGINEERING VENTURES, ENGINEERING VENTURES, ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN EXPERIAN FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M FISCHBACH & MOORE TRAF. FRAZIN, SHERI GTE G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM GELS, PAUL GEIS, PAUL GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TEMP HELP (2)W/E 4/11 BR1DGHAM TEMP HELP (2)W/E 4/11 BRIDGHAM TEMP HELP (2)W/E 4/11 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP C2)W/E 4/11 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP (2)W/E 4/11 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 D.BRIOGHAM TEMP HELP W/E 4/11 C.00NAHOE TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 C.00NAHOE 95366-02 DIEGO DR LDSC APRIL AUTOCAD SERVICES CREDIT: BILLING ERROR POLICE BADGE/WALLET-J.STONE POLICE BADGE/WALLET-J.STONE FREIGHT TAX SUPPLIES FOR EOC DISASTER FREI GHT TAX REFRESHMENTS/COUNCIL MTG/5-13 CREDIT APS FOR RDA - APR EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES REIMB:BID PW96-17 TRAF.SIGNAL REFUND:POM & CHEER RELOCATION OF PHONE FACILITIES 909-699-1370-COP-APR REPAIR OF POLICE MOTORCYCLES REPAIR OF POLICE MOTORCYCLES MAR PROF SERVS-CITY MAINT FAC! OFFICE SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPT MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT TAX MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-199-999-5118 320-199-999-5118 001-150-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 280-199-999-5118 001-150-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 280-199-999-5118 320-199-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 193-180-999-5240 001-163-999-5250 001-163-999-5250 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001'150-999'5260 001'150-999-5260 001-150-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 280'199-999-5250 001-120-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-150-999-5250 001-199-4053 190-18~-4982 210-165-601-5804 001-1990 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 210-190-144-5804 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-110-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 1,714.57 839.87 380.25 380.25 760.50 387.21 387.21 795.33 2,554.44 1,456.40 2,912.80 219.08 350.00 25.00- 61.20 31.00 6.00 7.38 70.00 5.00 5.43 115.01 50.00 15.56 40.61 93.00 25.00 20.00 236,876.00 122.52 200.00 325.00 2,212.50 147.44 222.96 17.28 29.63 CHECK AMOUNT 12,568.83 219.08 325.00 195.44 50.00 56.17 93.00 25.00 20.00 236,876.00 122.52 525.00 2,212.50 417.31 'RE2 ./97 13:20 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 43533 05/22/97 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, 43534 05/22/97 000520 H D L COREM & CONE~ INC 43535 05/22/97 001720 HOMETRONICS, INC. 43535 05/22/97 001720 HOMETRONIES, INC. 43535 05/22/97 001720 HOMETRONICS, INC. 43535 05/22/97 001720 HOMETRONICS, INC. 43536 05/22/97 001060 HYATT 43537 05/22/97 002787 43537 05/22/97 002787 43537 05/22/97 002787 IDENTICATOR CORPORATION [DENTICATOR CORPORATION IOENTICATOR CORPOILRT]ON 43538 05/22/97 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE, INC. 43539 05/22/97 JOHNSON, DEBBIE 43540 ~0 05/22/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 05/22/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE ,~541 05/22/97 000206 43542 05/22/97 000209 43542 05/22/97 000209 43543 05/22/97 001534 43543 05/22/97 001534 43544 05/22/97 002187 43545 05/22/97 001522 43545 05/22/97 001522 CXTY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIl}OS 43546 05/22/97 43547 05/22/97 002229 43548 05/22/97 002632 43549 05/22/97 001967 43550 05/22/97 002011 43551 05/22/97 000220 43552 05/22/97 001290 05/22/97 00138~ 05/22/97 001384 KINKO'S, INC. L & M FERTILIZER, INC. L & M FERTILIZER, INC. LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV ITEM DESCR l PT ] ON APR/MAY ALARM SRVCS'SUB'STATIO 96-97 PROPERTY TAX CORSULT.SVC 35" TV/ADVANCED PIP-PRIO~I~ STTN 4 HEAD VCR-PRKVI~ FIRE STATION RCA 20" TV-PRIOA/ FIRE STATION TAX HTL:GFOA CF:MrnERNOTT 5/31-6/4 DIGIT-10 FINGERPRINT SYSTEM FREIGHT TAX RECRUITMENT AD/OEV. PROC.COORD. REFUND: BEGINNING TUMBLERS TEMP HELP U/E 5/4 d.EVANS TEMP HELP U/E 5/4 J.EVANS PRINTING SERVICES FOR RDA MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS/EQUI P. ~MA] NT. CRE~ AIR:J.STONE: ICSC CF:5/18-20 AIR:R.ROBERTS: ICSC CF:5/18-20 LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR APR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES LAKE ELSINORE, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CITY OF LEVEZU, ALAN LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I MAIL BOXES ETC. MANPOgER TEMPORARY SERV MARTIN, KATHARINA E. MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MEYER, JOHN MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS REG:R.ROBERTS R.BRADLEY 6/21 REG:R.ROBERTS R.BRAOLEY 6/21 REFUND:MUSIC FOR TODDLERS APR-LUCE PRESS CLIPPING SRVCS MAY MAIL DELIVERY SERVICES TEMP HELP W/E 5/4 J.CASTILLO TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNZNGS 13 THANK YOU CERT. PRINTS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS (10)SETS OF 500 BUSINESS CAROS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-170-999-5610 001-140-999-5248 210-190-626-5610 210-190-626-5610 210-190-626-5610 210-190-626-5610 001-140-999-5258 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-150-999-5254 190-18~-4982 001-163-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 280-199-999-5222 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5242 001-100-999-5258 001-1[)0-999-5258 001-172-999-5255 001-1(10-999-5260 001-110-999-5260 190-183-4982 280-199-999-5270 330-19'9-999-57~0 001-164-604-5118 190-183-999-5330 001-150-999-5265 190-1&$-999-5330 001-1~D-999-5222 001-1~D-999-5222 ITEM AMOUNT 2~.99 2,400.00 1,255.00 279.00 199.00 134.31 439.56 590.00 7.86 45.73 57.60 50.00 46.80 265.20 7.28 939.26 458.47 81.00 159.00 2,753.66 35.00 35.00 32.00 150.63 121.00 574.00 520.00 200.42 60. O0 382.50 29.64 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 2,400.00 1,867.31 439.56 643.59 57.60 50.00 312.00 7.28 1,397.73 240.00 2,753.66 70.00 32.00 150.6~ 121.00 574.00 520.00 200.42 60. O0 412.14 VOUCHRE2 05/22/97 13:20 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERI(DOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 43554 05/22/97 001214 VENDOR NAME MORNINGSTAR MUSICAL PRO ITEM DESCRIPTZON "BATTLE'OF THE BANDS" 5/10/97 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5320 ITEM AMOUNT 100.00 CHECK AMOUNT 100.00 43555 05/22/97 001584 43555 05/22/97 001584 43555 05/22/97 001584 NEUPORT PRINTING SYSTEM NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM PRESENTAT]ON CHECK-PARKVI El~ FREIGHT TAX 001-171-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 248.60 74.99 19.27 342.86 43556 05/22/97 002139 43556 05/22/97 002139 43556 05/22/97 002139 43556 05/22/97 002139 43556 05/22/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT AD FOR CINCO DE MAYO FESTIVAL ROADWAY CONSTRUCT]ON UPDATES PUBLIC NOTICE - CDBG FY 97-98 PUB.HEARING NOTICE/PA97-0099 PUB.HEARING NOTICE/PA97-0083 190-180-999-5254 001-165-999-5256 001-140-999-5254 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 120.75 169.06 45.50 47.84 45.21 428.36 43557 05/22/97 002100 OBJECT RAZ)IANCE, INC. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 336.00 336.00 43558 05/22/97 002105 43558 05/22/97 002105 43558 05/22/97 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MA]NT. & REPAIRS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE &REPA]R VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 001-110-999-5214 001-163-999-5214 001-163-999-5214 90.38 172.52 25.95 288.85 43559 05/22/97 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES 43560 05/22/97 002344 OSVOLD, HEIDA LAKE MAINT & "THE POND" REIMB:SIERRA CF:4/30-5/1 190'180-999-5250 001-161-999-5261 800.00 35.78 800.00 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH 43562 05/22/97 000254 43562 05/22/97 000254 43562 05/22/97 000254 43562 05/22/97 000254 43562 05/22/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PUBLIC NOTICE:PROPOSED ORDINAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PROPOSED ORDINA PUBLIC NOTICE:PROPOSED ORDINAN SUB:FINANCE:4/25/97-7/3/97 SUBMISSION FOR SAVVY AWARDS 210-190-144-5804 001-161-999-5260 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5260 001-110-999-5208 190-184-999-5301 001-150-999-5260 190-184-999-5301 190-184-999-5301 190-184-999-5301 190-184-999-5301 190-184-999-5301 190-18~-999-5305 001-150-999-5260 001-164-604-5260 001-162-999-5230 001-165-999-5260 001-140-999-5262 001-162-999-5243 190-183-999-5320 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-140-999-5228 280-19~-99~-5270 2.63 11.59 3.04 11.67 16.~ 36.91 21.22 41.80 4.93 37.04 27.49 44.48 5.37 20.00 2.50 5.36 47.00 27.40 11.10 51.79 8.50 9.00 9.00 24.01 35.00 430.05 85 ~1 43563 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001317-6:J$:APRIL 001-100-~99-5208 53.07 43563 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001339-O:KL:APRIL 001-100-999-5208 53.21 *RE2 CITY OF TEMECULA /97 13:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 43563 05/22/97 00277'6 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-500Z361-3:PB:APR%L 001-100-999-5208 30.82 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001383-8:RR:APRIL 001-100-999-5208 61.26 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001218-6:MJM:APRIL 001-110-999-5208 109.19 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001322-6:RB:APRIL 001-110-999-5208 45.19 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001375-4/JG 001-120-999-5208 29.13 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001391-1:GR:APRIL 001-140-999-5208 37.08 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-50013~3-2:GY:APRIL 001-150-999-5208 134.55 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001215-2:GT:APRIL 001-161-999-5208 27.72 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001379-6:JH:APRIL 001-163-999-5208 148.89 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001207-9:BB:APRIL 001-164-601-5208 62.62 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5003835-5:BLAZER:APRIL 001-164-601-5208 46.74 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001237-6:PW EOC:APRIL 001-16~-604-5208 106.58 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001220-2:PW MAINT:APRIL 001-164-601-5208 39.38 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001278-O:SM:APRIL 001-164-604-5208 65.11 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001251-7 BH 190-180-999-5208 31.98 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5002330-8 CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 31.99 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001348-1KH 190-180-999-5208 49.21 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001349-9/MW 190-180-999-5208 58.00 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5003948-6/SN 190-180-999-5208 40.50 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001377-0 SR VAN 190-180-999-5208 42.18 1,304.40 05/22/97 002812 QUINT & THIMMI# LLP LEGAL SERV RE:OLD TWN/WESTSIDE 280-199-999-5246 2,500.00 2,500.00 43565 43565 43565 05/22/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 28747 PUJOL STREET WATER METER 280-199-807-5804 303.64 05/22/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER PAUBA ROAO WATER METER 001-171-999-5240 10.31 05/22/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER PAUBA ROAD WATER METER 001-171-999-5240 50.05 3 64. O0 43566 05/22/97 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET APRIL 1997 LEGAL SERVICES-H.R. 001-130-999-5247 87.50 87.50 43567 05/22/97 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORT TOILET FOR CITY YARD 001-164-601-5238 57.39 57.39 43568 05/22/97 001365 RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME HEALTH PERMITS FOR SNACK BAR 190-180-999-5250 43568 05/22/97 001365 RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME HEALTH PERMIT FOR PALONA DEL S 190-180-999-5250 65.00 65.00 130.00 43569 43569 43569 43569 43569 43570 05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION APR PRGSS WINCHESTER/I-15 BRDG 280-199-602-5804 161,245.75 05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION APR PRGSS WINCH/I-15 CHANGE OR 280-199-602-580~ 19,775.62 05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION APR PRRSS WINCH/I-15 RETENTION 280-2035 18,101.94- 05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION AMOUNT ADJT FOR CHANGE ORDERS 280'199-602-5804 21,714.75- 05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CORRECT AMOUNTS FOR CHANGE ORD 280-2035 2,171.47 05/22/97 002263 RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDIN MEMBERSHIP:J.KICAK:1997 001-164-604-5226 25.00 143,374.15 25.00 43571 43571 43571 43571 43571 05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST & OCT PROF PLAN CHECK CONSULT SV 001-162-999-5248 387.75 05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & JAN PROF PLAN CHECK CONSULT SV 001-162-999-5248 142.25 05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, NaN FROST & NOV PROF PLAN CHECK CONSULT SV 001-162-999-5248 135.75 05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & OEC PROF PLAN CHECK CONSULT SV 001-162-999-5248 247.00 05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WH FROST & dUNE PROF PLAN CHECKING SVCS 001-162-999-5248 517.75 05/22/97 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. REIMB:LEAGUE/CA CITIES CF:4/30 001-100-999-5258 39.65 05/22/97 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR "BATTLE OF BANDS" 190-183-999-5320 151.18 1,430.50 39.65 151.18 VOUCHRE2 05/22/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43574 43575 43575 43575 43576 43576 43576 43576 43576 43577 43578 43579 43579 43579 43580 43581 43582 43582 43582 43583 43584 43584 43584 43584 43585 43586 43586 43586 43587 43587 13:20 CHECK DATE 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 05/22/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000519 000537 000537 000537 001212 001212 001212 001212 001212 000752 000305 0003O5 000305 000307 002766 002766 002766 002621 002621 002621 002621 001342 002109 002109 002109 001918 001918 VENDOR NAME SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COHP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CONP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SOUZA, ROSEMARY STONE, JEFFREY E. TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TEMEEU HILLS DEV.PARTNE THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS TRAFFIC COUNTS INC. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WHITE CAP WHITE CAP WHITE CAP ZUMAR INDUSTRIES~ INC. ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MAY PEST CONTRL SRVCS-SEN CNTR 2o02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA 2-02-351-6800 VARIOUS METERS 2o01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 021 725 0775 SR CENTER 101 525 0950 TCC 133 040 7'57'5 CITY HALL 095 167 7907:PAUBA RD 091 024 9300 CRC REFUND:CONTRACTED CLASS REIMB:LEAGUE/CA CITIES CF:4/30 2 CAMERAS FOR RDA/PLAN DEPT 2 CAMERAS FOR RDA/PLAN DEPT MISC.SUPPLIES FOR REC.CLASSES "BATTLE OF THE BANDS" A~/ARD REFUND:OVERPAYMENT/PA97-0160 LAMINATED THOMAS BROS MAP FREIGHT TAX TRAFFIC COUNTER MACHINE RENTAL 5415305001995928 MJM 5415305001995928 MJM 5415305001995928 MJM 5415305001995928 MJM BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS/EQUIP.FOR LAND DEV TAX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PW TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-181-999-5250 190-182-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 190-181-999-5240 190-184-999-5240 ~40-199-701-5240 001-171-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-183-4982 001-100-999-5258 001-110-999-52~: 280-199-999-5242 190-180-999-5301 190-183-999-5370 001-161-4129 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-1170 280-199-999-5228 280-1990 280-199-999-5270 001-110-999-5220 190-180-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 001-163-999-5242 001-163-999-5242 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 29. O0 3,030.24 44.04 7,424.84 35.44 29.26 33.53 16.43 538.00 16.00 54.77 76.92 32.96 10.17 64.67 299.00 175.00 6.00 14.93 150.00 107.00 15.00 487.60 66.42- 183.60 4.79 248. O0 19.22 863.00 66.88 CHECK AMOUNT 29.0[ 10,499.12 652.66 16.00 54.77 120.05 299.00 195.93 150.00 543.18 183.60 272.01 929.88 TOTAL CHECKS 483,939.79 ~RE2 PAGE /97 11:18 CITY OF TE#ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV- LO~/NOO SET ASIDE 190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL ]#PROVEHENT PROJ FUND REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP iNSURANCE FUND INFORHATiON SYSTENS SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES ANOUNT 81,209.99 868.87 20,599.31 1,137.67 57.86 2,122.40 396.60 457.94 8,539.53 315.05 8,6~.~,5 266.67 2,379.49 TOTAL 126,985.8:1 VOUCHRE2 05/29/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 7O6024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 706024 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 727112 43590 43590 43590 43590 43590 11:18 CHECK DATE 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/9? 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 O5/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 O5/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000444 OO0444 000444 0004Z~4 000444 000444 OO0444 000444 000444 000444 OOOX~ 000444 000444 00044./+ 000444 000444 000444 000444 000283 000283 00028~ O0O283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000724 000724 000724 O0O724 000724 VENDOR NANE INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTAT/O( (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDO) IHSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) IHSTATAX (EDD) I#STATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) I#STATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O((IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) ]NSTATAX (IRS) ]NSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O( (IRS) IHSTATAX (IRS) IHSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O((IRS) INSTAT/O((IRS) IHSTATAX (]RS) INSTATAX (IRS) ]NSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) ZHSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (]RS) A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000444 SDI 00O444 SDI 000444 SOl 000444 SOl 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 0002R~ MEDICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE BASEBALL PROGRAM AWARDS T-SHIRTS FOR THE 4TH OF JULY T-SHIRTS FOR THE 4TH OF JULY SET-UP CHARGE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 19~J-2070 280-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 190-183-999-5380 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 ITEM AMOUNT 38.78 4.22 55.48 1.52 4.68 3.64 4,247.04 75.22 837.61 1.44 3.40 56.83 28.34 141.95 43.08 147.86 19.40 34.15 15,836.39 248.15 3,660.19 8.39 20.94 313.99 156.51 461.40 136.94 616.80 91.41 229.66 3,554.84 959.48 2.28 5.22 87.20 36.10 125.07 24.21 112.90 26.54 99.66 346.96 576.00 168.00 25.00 59.60 CHECK AMOUNT 5,744.6~ 26,~7.63 1,! 43591 05/29/97 002804 ACTION CHEMICAL ENVIRO CLEAR FOR DUCK POND 190-180-999-5415 1,600.00 ~E2 /97 11:18 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 05/29/97 002804 ACTION CHEMICAL VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 43591 43591 05/29/97 002804 ACTION CHEMICAL 43591 05/29/97 002804 ACT%ON CHEMICAL 43592 05/29/97 ALBERTSONS 43593 05/29/97 002816 ALL VLLY PLUMBING & MEC 43594 05/29/97 002669 AMERICAN BATTERY, INC. 43595 05/29/97 000102 AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C 43595 05/29/97 000102 AMER%CAN FENCE CO. OF C 43596 05/29/97 002480 ANIXTER, INC 43597 05/29/97 00272~ APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC. 43597 43598 '9 45600 43601 43601 43602 43603 43603 43603 43603 43604 05/29/97 001275 43605 05/29/97 002106 43606 05/29/97 000155 43607 05/29/97 001380 43608 05/29/97 001056 43608 05/29/97 001056 43609 05/29/97 000165 43609 05/29/97 000165 05/29/97 000170 05/29/97 000170 05/29/97 000170 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 000135 05/29/97 000135 05/29/97 000137 05/29/97 002037 05/29/97 002037 05/29/97 0027~3 APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC. 05/29/97 002805 BECKER ENGINEERING 002377 BEST BUY COHPANY, INC. 002363 C C P 0 A CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CHEVRON U S A INC. COH-AID, INC. CON-AID, INC. 05/29/97 002037 COM-AID, INC. 05/29/97 002037 COM-AID, INC. COHPUSERVE, INC. DA FAMILY SUPPORT DAVLIN E S X EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FRANKLIN GUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN GUEST CONPAHY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIDOS I TEN DESCR I PT I ON ENVIRO-BLUE FOR DUCK POND LABOR TAX REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT PRGH VEHICLE BATTERIES APR TEMP FENCING-PUJOL ST JUN SECURITY FENCE-PUJOL ST NISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES BARD RADAR -POLICE DEPT TAX CONSTRUCT CAGE FOR CITY YARD VIDEO CAMERA, FILM/SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP:L. FANENE 97 TEMPORARY "HO PARKING" SIGNS TAX FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES MISC REPAIR & MAINT OF EQUIP (2)FIBER ADAPTORS TAX CALL ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE APR COMPUSERVE INFO SERVICE 002106 SUPPORT 5/19 PLANNING COMMISSION MTG TEMP HELP(2)W/E 5/9 DONAHOE RNCHO HIGHLANDS-REPAIR MAINLNE MAY LDSC-SPORTS PRK IMPROVEMNT EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES CALENDAR REFZ LLS/SUPPLIES CREDIT: DUPLICATE SHIPMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES/PLANNING ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-2900 165-199-813-5804 001-162-999-5214 280-199-807-5804 165-199-812-5804 320-199-999-5221 001-170-999-5610 001-177-999-5610 001-164-601-5610 001-165-999-5242 001-170-999-5226 190-18:3-999-5370 190-18:3-999-5370 001-162-999-5263 320-199-999-5215 320-1~-99~-5242 320-199-999-5242 320-1980 320-199-999-5228 190-2140 001-161-999-5250 001-161-999-5118 193-180-~9-5212 190-180-999-5415 001-150-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-161-999-5220 001-171-999-5228 001-161-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 360.00 151.90 100.00 55.00 15.41 45.00 44.00 239.12 2,845.00 220.49 3,960.00 834.14 25.00 150.00 11.63 14.67 38.00 462.00 35.81 974.00 9.95 82.50 163.36 2,066.27 64.47 1,~50.00 9.69 7.40 145.03 185.01- 45.15 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 2,861.90 100.00 55.00 15.41 89.00 239.12 3,065.49 3,960.00 834.14 25.00 161.63 14.67 1,509.81 9.95 82.50 163.36 2,066.27 2,014.47 17.09 5.17 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 05/29/97 11:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENI)OR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NANE DESCRIPTZOR NUMBER TEN ANOUNT CHECK 43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-197-5072-NAY-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-506*1941-MAY-PTA CD TTACSO 320-199-999-5208 43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-676-0783-MAY-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-676-6243-MAY-PALA COI~ PRK 320-199-999-5208 43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-4354-MAY-PALA COMM PRK 320-199-999-5208 43611 05/29/97 00018/, G T E CALIFOR#IA - PAYM 909-695-356~-MAY-CITY ALARM 320-199-999-5208 43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-2811-MAY-GENERAL USAGE 320-1990 43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-8632-MAY-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 43612 05/29/97 002545 GAMBLE, MARK S. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 3,008.59 55.09 63.06 27.55 30.36 53.49 1,342.57 28.19 300.00 4,608.90 300.00 43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL CI:~qPUTER SUPPLIE (12) DUST BLASTERS 320-199-999-5221 43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLZE ANTI-STATIC WIPES 320-199-999-5221 43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL CO#PUTER SUPPLIE SONY FLOPPY DISKETTES 320-199-999-5221 43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE TAX 320-199-999-5221 6~.20 7.98 87.98 14.35 12.92 187.43 43614 05/29/97 001609 GREATER ALARN COMPANY, QTR 2 ALARM SRVC-SUB STATION 001-170-999-5610 55.50 55.50 43615 05/29/97 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE MAY EAP PROGRAM 43616 05/29/97 000963 HOGAN, OAVID REIMB: PLANNING CF 5/15-16 001-150-999-5250 001-161-999-5258 358.80 437.46 · 43617 05/29/97 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212 43618 05/29/97 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 43619 05/29/97 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES APR ENG PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-163-999-5249 43619 05/29/97 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES APR EHG PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-163-999-5249 43619 05/29/97 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES WORKERS COMP FOR INV#97-15 001-1182 43619 05/29/97 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES OEBIT:HOURS BILLED 12.5 S/B 13 001-163-999-5249 43620 05/29/97 002023 KING, WENDE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 43621 05/29/97 001282 KNORR SYSTENS, INC POOL CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 43622 05/29/97 002806 LAKE ELSINORE SPORTS BICYCLE RENTAL FOR BIKE SCHOOL 001-170-999-5261 43622 05/29/97 002806 LAr, E ELSINORE SPORTS TAX 001-170-999-5261 43623 05/29/97 000996 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC PUB:CAL LAND USE 97 SUPPLEMENT 001-161-999-5228 43624 05/29/97 001967 MANPOWER TENPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/11 CASTILLO 001-16~-604-5118 43625 05/29/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT NP OFFICEdET LASER PRINTER 210-190-626-5610 43625 05/29/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT TAX 210-190-626-5610 43626 05/29/97 002768 NIP. AGE PRINTING & IMAGI POSTERS FOR 4TH OF JULY EVENT 190-183-999-5370 43626 05/29/97 002768 MIRAGE PRINTING & IMAGI TAX 190-183-999-5370 43627 05/29/97 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262 43627 05/29/97 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-999-5263 310.32 2,862.50 315.00 54.66- 15.00 212.50 19.23 162.00 12.56 94.93 574.00 425.00 32.94 321.28 24.90 132.35 42.22 310.32 3,137.84 212.50 19.23 174.56 94.93 574.00 457.94 /97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUHBER 43627 43628 43629 43630 43631 43632 43633 43634 43635 43636 11:18 CHECK DATE 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000228 000883 001654 001214 0008~5 002105 002088 001354 001911 VENDOR NAME MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO MONTELEONE EXCAVATING MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. MORNINGSTAR MLISICAL PRO NATIONAL LEAGUE OF ClTI NETI~ORK SUBSCRIPTION SE OLD TC~ TIRE & SERVICE OLD TO~ TYPEgRITER P C MAGAZINE PALA MESA RESORT PATEL, NIKLINJ I. CITY OF TE#ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES TRUCK RENTAL AND MOVE EOUIPMNT MASTER/DUPLICATE APERTURE CARD EVENT STAFF CRC OVERTIME "CONNECT CITIZENS & GOV'T"APPL SUBSCRIPTIOR:301285HFE3200B096 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT REPAIR/CLEAN TYPEWRITER AT CRC SUBSCRIPTION: 301285 HFE 3174B NGMT RETREAT 4/24 & 4/25/97 REFUND: OVERPNT BL8626 45638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 0002/,6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 0002&6 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 0002&6 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 05/29/9? 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5263 001-164-601-5250 001-120-999-5277 190-183-999-5320 001-1990 320-199-999-5228 190-180-999-5214 190-182-999-5217 320-199-999-5228 001-150-999-5260 001-199-4056 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 19'5-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2122 I TEN AMOUNT 15.61 3,500.00 65.54 100.00 159.00 22.97 75.70 65. O0 2,941.60 1.00 22.18 15,78~.90 233.95 3,023.32 11.05 27.66 379.28 174.68 471.48 110.36 546.16 128.39 360.39 313.17 61.95 .8~ 13.58 .05 .14 1.77 .97 1.85 .46 1.86 .93 2.09 40.62 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 190.18 3,500.00 65.54 100.00 159.00 22.97 75.70 65. O0 79.95 2,941.60 1.00 21,673.46 40.62 VOUCHRE2 05/29/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 4364O 436~0 436~0 43641 43642 43642 43642 43642 43643 43643 43644 43645 43645 43645 43646 43647 43647 43648 43649 43650 43651 43651 43651 43651 43652 43653 43654 43654 43654 43654 43654 43654 43654 43655 11:18 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 000247 PESTMASTER 000247 PESTMASTER 000247 PESTMASTER 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN 0027'/6 PRIME MATRIX, INC. 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. 002776 PRIME NATR[X, INC. 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE 000262 000262 000262 IL~NCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 000404 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR 001942 S C SIGNS 002034 SAN DIEGO, CITY OF 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFONINA 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS 002150 002150 002150 002150 002150 002150 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PROOUCTS SU~4IT SAFETY PR~OUCTS StJ~41T SAFETY PRODUCTS SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS 001672 TENECULA DRAIN SERV & P CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION RENEWAL OF R-O-W ~EED CONTROL WEED ABATEMENT IN CHANNELS REMOVAL/CUTTING SLOPES PUBLIC NOTICE:PA97-0088 SC-5001373-9 TE SC-5001206'1 HP SC'5001202'0 IS SC'5002401-7 TH MAINTENANCE FACILITY RE-KEY CRC LOCKSMITH SERVICES EQUIP RENTAL FOR ENPYEE APPREC VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS PRINTING SERVICES FOR PLANNING FEB PRKING CITATION ASSESSMNT FEB PRKING CITATION ASSESSMNT PUBLIC HEARING SIGN PA96-0130 INSTALL/MAINTAIN RADIO EQUIP. CITY HALL - PEST CONTROL SVCS. 2-07-626-6063 RANCHO VISTA 2-05-7~91-8807VARIOUS METERS 2-04-792-9005 ~R~RITA 53-77-806-0780-01 COSMIC REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT RESCREEN PATIO DOORS:CHRISTIAN SHEER ADHESIVE STRIPS #020~ LATEX GLOVES #31~ MICROSHIELD & POUCH #1904 FREIGHT TAX MICROSHZELD & POUCH #1904 TAX TEM COMM CTR PLUMBING SERVS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-164-601-5402 001-164-601-5401 001-164-601-5402 001-161-999-5256 001-162-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 340-199-702-5250 190-182-999-5212 001-150-999-5265 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-161-999-5222 001-2265 001-2260 001-120-999-5244 001-170-999-5215 340-199-701-5250 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 190-2900 165-199-813-5804 190-183-999-5310 190-1R~-999-5310 190-1~-999-5310 190-1g-~9-5310 190-1g-~-5310 190-1~-~-5310 190-1g-~-5310 190-184-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 2,154.65 4,273.00 2,925.00 18.25 41.51 36.42 31.59 40.31 332.75 250.00 95.04 964.43 105.41 1,180.62 16.64 115.00 1,771.50 130.00 1,239.39 56.00 13.92 288.42 1,319.02 720.63 100.00 13.96 28.40 85.00 10.00 9.87 85.00 6.59 69.00 CHECK AMOUNT 9,352.65 18.25 149.83 582.75 95.04 2,250.46 1,886.50 130.00 1,239.39 56.00 2,341.99 100.00 68.75 238.82 43656 05/29/97 000311 TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC ADVERTISING IN TVHS FTBAL PRSM 001-100-99~-5254 220.00 220.00 /97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43657 11:18 CHECK DATE 05/29/97 VENDOR NUMBER 001022 VENDOR NAME THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FAIR LABOR STANDARDS HANDBOOK 43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (ORRA) 000389 PT RETIR 43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO ¢ORRA) 000389 PT RETIR 43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 43659 43659 43659 43659 43660 43660 43660 43660 43660 4366O 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 05/29/97 ,1 45661 43662 43662 43662 000325 000325 000325 000325 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 002566 002566 002566 000332 001342 001342 001342 002092 002092 002092 000347 43663 43664 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, VAIL ELEMENTARY PTA VAIL ELEMENTARY PTA VALLEY MICRO CC~PUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI WALT DISNEY~S KRGIC KIN WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN 43665 43665 43665 43666 43666 43666 43667 000325 UW 000325 U~ 000325 UW 000325 UU UNIFORMS RENTAL & CLEANING PW TCSD UN%FORM MAINTENANCE CITY HALL FLOOR HATS RENTAL CRC FLOOR HAT RENTAL SR CTR FLOOR HATS RENTAL TEM COt4M CTR FLOOR HAT RENTAL REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT MICROSOFT PUBLISHER 97 1 CO ROM DRIVE WINDOWS/WORDPERFECT TRAINING PLAN CHECK FEES VAN DORPE MEMBERSHIP: O-0823M-MK BLDG HAINT SUPPLIES:CITY YARD BLDG HAINT SUPPLIES:CITY YARD BLDG HA]NT SUPPLIES: CITY HALL TEMECULA TOURISM NWLTTR DESIGN PRINTING "RIGHT FIT" BROCHURE OESIGN "RIGHT FIT" BROCHURE MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR CITY ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-150-999-5228 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 3~0-2160 001-2120 165-2120 190-2120 280-2120 001-16~-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 360-199-701-5212 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-18~-999-5250 190-2900 190-183-4990 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5261 001-162-999-5248 001-150-999-5226 340-199-702-5212 340-199-702-5212 340-199-701-5212 280-199-999-5270 280-199-999-5270 280-199-999-5270 340-199-701-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 248.00 581.72 63.38 832.24 22.80 70.16 54.58 101.80 2.50 17.00 2.70 696.63 106.55 185.24 127.60 51.72 65.88 100.00 34.00 86.15 134.69 258.00 4,379.66 135.00 197.63 ~0.00 26.13 2,338.65 3,145.22 1,731.37 47.57 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 248.00 1,624.88 124.00 1,233.62 134.00 478.84 4,379.66 135.00 973.76 7,215.24 47.57 TOTAL CHECKS 126,985.83 VOUCHRE2 05,,~0/97 08:~* CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 210 CAPITAL ZMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - AMOUNT 202,7"57.46 150,214.80 5,102.50 TOTAL 358,054.76 ~E2 .,/97 08:44 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 43679 05/29/97 43682 05/30/97 43683 05/30/97 43684 05/30/97 43685 05/30/97 43686 05/30/97 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000348 ZIGLER, GAlL 002802 ELLIS GROUP, INC. KI/FKLA RANCHO REALITY K]/FKLA RANCHO REALITY, STATE STREET BANK & TRU 002817 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTY VEH CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICeS ITEM DESCRIPTION REIMB:STAFF APPRECIATION LUNCH APR LEGAL SERVICES CASE#282~ll-SETTLEMENT CSE#282~06 SETTLEMENT FINAL SETTLEMENT PAYMENT COMMAND POST TRAILER ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-150-999-5265 280-1652 210-165-601-5700 210-165-601-5700 001-1700 001-170-9~-5610 ITEM AMOUNT 112.46 5,102.50 33,493.92 116,720.88 181,500.00 21,125.00 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 112.46 5,102.50 33,493.92 116,720.88 181,500.00 21,125.00 TOTAL CHECKS 358,054.76 VOUCHRE2 05/~9/97 11:33 CZTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COHHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C Z10 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND INFORHATION SYSTEHS FACILITIES AHOUNT 140,535.21 37,&12.64 1,627.00 20,080.7'7 10,850.00 5,879.25 496.37 TOTAL 216,881.2& '.E2 /97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43670 4~670 43671 43671 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 43672 ~672 43674 43674 43675 43675 43676 43676 43676 4367'7 4367-/' 43677 43678 43678 11:33 CHECK DATE 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 06/10/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002348 002348 001281 001281 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 0O0126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 002758 000164 00016~ 001056 001056 001343 0013~3 001343 000406 000406 000406 000434 000434 VENDOR NAME A-PARK AVENUE BUILDERS A-PARK AVENUE BUILDERS ALHAMBRA GROUP ALHAMBRA GROUP CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LAMOSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA ENVIABLE GREENS ESGIL CORPORATION ESGIL CORPORATION EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE HO~E gELDING & FABRICAT HOgE gELDING & FABRICAT HO~/E gELDING & FABRICAT RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFtS SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS CITY OF TEMECIJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DELETION OF DESILTING PONDS REMOVE SILT/DEBRIS -CHANNEL APR LDSC DESIGN SRVCS-gINCHSTR APR LDSC DESIGN SRVCS-gINCHSTR TEMECULA DUCK POMD LDSP HAINT MARGARITA NEDIAM REPAIR4936701 HAY LDSC HAINT PARKS MAY LDSC HAINT SENIOR CENTER HAY LDSC HAINT FOR CRC HAY LOSC MAINT CITY HALL MAY LOSC HAINT MEDIANS HAY LDSC HAINToT C C HAY LDSC HAINT SAM HICKS PARK MAY LDSC PAINT -T.M.S. HAY LDSC HAINT'MARGAR.MEDIANS CREDIT:APR LDSC SERVICES CREDIT:APR LDSC SERVICES CREDIT:APR LDSC SERVICES VERTI-DRAIN SPORT FIELDS MARCH PLAN CHECK SERVICES MARCH PLAN CHECK SERVICES MAY LDSC MAINT SLOPES HAY LDSC HAINT SPORTS PARK FABRICATE 2 STORAGE RACKS REPLACE YARD ENTRANCE GATE FABRICATE SIGN POST RACK/BARRI 96-97 LAW ENFORCEMNT FACILITY 96-97 LAW ENFORCENNT FACILITY MARCH 97 BOOKING FEES SIERRA SUPPORT MAINTENANCE TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-164-601-5401 001-164-601-5401 210-190-149-5802 210-190-149-5802 190-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 191-180-999-5415 190-184-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 001-162-999-52&8 001-162-999-5248 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 001-16~-601-5610 001-16~-601-5610 001-16~-601-5610 001-170-999-5234 001-2030 001-170-999-5273 320-199-~9-5211 320-1~9-999-5211 ITEM AMOUNT B,000.00 6,500.00 8,910.90 1,939.10 141.25 616.00 19,651.37 245.67 1,692.53 496.37 926.00 325.00 760.00 1,480.00 85.00 981.23- 4.91- 101.55- 6,500.00 1,771.49 4,802.55 20,080.77 7,704.51 5,600.00 213.75 4,090.00 24,960.55 74,~1.67 9,715.20 5,670.00 209.25 PAGE I CHECK AMOUNT 14,500.00 10,850.00 25,331.50 6,500.00 6,574.04 27,785.28 9,903.75 109,557.42 5,879.25 TOTAL CHECKS 216,881.24 . -.. . , I'I'EM 4 ADPROVAI. CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~J June 10, 1997 City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by Staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds. DISCUSSION: The California legislature has passed legislation imposing a State-mandated local program requiring the treasurer or chief fiscal officer to render an annual statement of investment policy to the legislative body of the local agency and to render a quarterly report containing specified information regarding investments and deposits to the chief executive officer and the legislative body of the local agency. The Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy, as presented herein, is in conformity with the State requirements and guidelines established by the California Municipal Treasurer's Association, the California Society of Municipal Treasurer's Association, and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. There are no changes this year to the existing policy. The City of Temecula currently invests primarily in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). This investment is consistent with the City's Investment Policy which prioritizes safety and liquidity over yield. It should be noted that LAIF is prohibited by state code from investing in certain derivative products such as inverse floaters. LAIF investment policy also puts constraints on the use of reverse repurchase agreements. Government Code Section 16429.3 states that 'money placed with the State Treasurer for deposit in LAIF by cities, counties, or special districts shall not be subject to impoundment or seizure by any state official or state agency". FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS Proposed Investment Policy R:tNORTONLb4OENDAStlNV~TPLC. AON 06/03/97 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY INTRODUCTION The investment policies and practices of the City of Temecula are based upon State law and prudent money management. The primary goals of these policies are: 1. To protect the principal monies entrusted to this office. 2. To provide sufficient liquidity to meet normal operating and unexpected expenditures. To assure compliance with all Federal, State, and Local laws governing the investment of monies under the control of the City Treasurer. To generate a maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of prudent risk management and consistent with the above policies. The monies entrusted to the City Treasurer (referred to as the 'Fund" throughout the remainder of this document) will be invested, administered, and reported in a timely and prudent manner. The City Treasurer and staff will observe, review, and react to changing conditions that effect the fund. The authority to execute investment transactions that will effect the Fund will be limited to: · City Manager or Assistant to the City Manager or City Clerk and · Director of Finance acting together The Director of Finance will meet on a regular basis with the City Manager to discuss current market conditions, future trends, and to plan investment strategy to meet the City's fiscal objectives. The policy stated below will also address risk management because it is such an integral part of the investment policy. To concentrate only on maximizing return would be dangerous; therefore, policy issues will be directed to: 1. Limiting the Fund's exposure to each issue and issuer of debt; and Determining a minimum credit requirement that firms must have in order to hold City money. R: INOR TONL ~ G ENDA $11N VS TPL C.~4 GN 1 III CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY SCOPE In accordance with Ordinance No. 90-2 of the City Council of the City of Temecula and as prescribed by Section 41000 through 41007 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the City Treasury. OBJECTIVES A. .~afety of PrinciDal Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Temecula. Each investment transaction shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether from securities default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk. Credit Risk. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing only with issuers whose financial strength and reputation can be verified to be the highest as rated by nationally known rating agencies (see Section VI for detailed limitations on credit risk), and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm the City's cash flow. Market Risk. Market risk, the risk of market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by (a) structuring the portfolio so that securities mature earlier than or concurrent with the timing of major cash outflows, thus eliminating the need to sell securities prior to their maturity; (b) prohibiting the use of leverage and margin accounts; and (c) prohibiting the taking of short positions -- that is, selling securities which the City does not own. It is explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall investment return. B. Return on Investment The City's investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market-average rate of return through economic cycles. The market-average rate of return is defined as the average return on three-month U.S. Treasury bills. Whenever possible, and consistent with risk limitations, as defined herein, and prudent investment principles, the Treasurer shall seek to augment returns above the market average rate of return. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, shall be held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City R:iNORTONL~GENDA$11NVSTPLC. AGN 2 04/02/87 IV V VI CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POUCY under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment procedures (i.e., the City's safekeeping agent will only release payment for a security after the security has been properly delivered). This section is intended to comply with Government Code 53635. REPORTING The City Treasurer shall render a monthly report to the City Manager and City Council showing the type of investment, issuing institution, selling institution, date of maturity, par and dollar amount of deposit, current market value for all securities, return on the City's investment portfolio expressed as an annual percentage rate, yield to maturity, cash flow information demonstrating that the City can meet its upcoming financial obligations, and such data as may be required by the City Council. The report shall also state its relationship to this statement of investment policy, as directed under the Code. The treasurer shall annually submit a recommended updated Investment Policy to be reviewed and approved by City Council. The City's investment reporting policy meets or exceeds the requirements of Section 53646 of the California Government Code. QUALIFIED DEALERS The City shall transact investments only with banks, savings and loans, investment security dealers and the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. The dealers must be primary dealers regularly reporting to the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Exceptions to this rule will be made only after thorough research and documented confirmation of financial strength and reputation and after approval by the City Council. Investment staff shall investigate dealers who wish to do business with the City in order to determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the City's needs, and are recommended by managers of portfolios like the City's. The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to all dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy shall be considered as evidence that the dealer understands the City's investment policies, and intends to show the City only appropriate investments. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS Investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent investor" rule, which states: "investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived.' The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq (attached). Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: R:INORTONLI,4GENDAStlNVSTPL C. AGN 3 o,/oz~7 Co CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY !Jnited .~tates Treasury Bills. Ronds. and Notes. or those for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for payment of principal and interest. There is no limitation as to the percentage of the portfolio which can be invested in this category. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five years, whichever is less. C~bligations issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (RNMA). the Federal Farm Credit Rank System (FFCR). the Federal Home ! pan Rank Roard (FH! R). and the Federal National Mortgage Association ¢FNMA). Although there is no percentage limitation on the dollar amount that can be invested in these issues, the "prudent investor" rule shall apply for a single agency name. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five years, whichever is less. Rills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial hank. otherwise known as banker's acceptances. Banker's acceptances purchased may not exceed 270 days to maturity or 40% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances issued by any one bank. Commercial ps.0er ranked "P1" by Moody's Investor Services and "A1 +" by Rtandard and Poor's. and issued by a domestic corporation having assets in excess of $500.000.000 and having an "A" or better rating on its long-term debentures as provided by Moody's or Standard and Poor's. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 15% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper issued by any one corporation. The City may invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation. The City may invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation's commercial paper. Maturity is not to exceed 180 days. Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by nationally or state-chartered bank or a state or federal savings and loan association. Negotiable certificates of deposit (NCDs) differ from other certificates of deposit by their deposit liquidity. They are issued against funds deposited for specified periods of time and earn specified or variable rates of interest. NCDs are traded actively in secondary markets. When feasible, an independent trading service will be used as part of the evaluation process. Issuers must be rated 'B" or better by Thomson Bank Watch or equivalent rating service, or rated A-1 for deposits by Standard & Poor's, or P-1 for deposits by Moody's or comparably rated by a national rating agency. Transactions in NCDs shall not collectively exceed 30% of the total portfolio in effect immediately after any such investment is made. Repurchase Agreements. The City may invest in repurchase agreements with banks and dealers with which the City has entered into a master repurchase agreement which specifies terms and conditions of repurchase agreements. R:~VORTONL kAGENDA$11NVSTPLC. AON 4 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY Transactions shall be limited to the primary dealers and the top banking institutions according to the rating agency based on liquidity, profitability, and financial strength. The maturity of repurchase agreements shall not exceed 30 days. The market value of securities used as collateral for repurchase agreements shall be monitored daily by the investment staff and will not be allowed to fall below 102% of the value of the repurchase agreement plus the value of collateral in excess of the value of the repurchase agreement (haircut). in order to conform with provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code which provide for the liquidation of securities held as collateral for repurchase agreements, the only securities acceptable as collateral shall be certificates of deposit, eligible bankers' acceptances, or securities that are direct obligations of, or that are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any agency of the United States. No more than 50% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase agreements, and a "perfected security interest" shall always be maintained in the securities subject to a repurchase agreement. local Agency Investment Fund. The City may invest in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies up to the maximum permitted by State law. Time r~eposits. The City may invest in non-negotiable time deposits collateralized in accordance with the California Government Code (attached), in those banks and savings and loan associations which meet the requirements for investment in negotiable certificates of deposit. Since time deposits are not liquid, no more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in this category. The issuer firm should have been in existence for at least five years. The City may waive the first 100,000 of collateral security for such deposits if the institution is insured pursuant to federal law. In order to security the uninsured portions of such deposits, an institution shall maintain at least 10% in excess of the total amount deposited. Real estate mortgages may not be accepted as collateral. The maximum term for deposits shall be one year. In general, the issuer must have a minimum 6% net worth to assets ratio or the minimum ratio established by the Comptroller of the Currency. The issuer's operation must have been profitable during their last reporting period. Money Market Funds. The City may invest in money market funds which invest solely in U.S. Treasuries, obligations of the U.S. Treasury, and repurchase agreements relating to such treasury obligations. To be eligible, companies selling money market funds must have an investment advisor with not less than five years experience and that is registered with the SEC, has the highest ranking available as evaluated by a nationally recognized rating service, and with assets in excess of $500 million. Ineligible Investments. Investments not described herein, including, but not limited to, reverse repurchase agreements, mutual funds, zero coupon bonds, inverse floaters, mortgage backed securities, common stocks and corporate notes and bonds are prohibited from use in this portfolio. R:INORTONLb4GEND~$11NVSTPLC. AGN 5 04/02/~7 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY VII SWAPPING OF SECURITIES A swap is the movement from one security to another and may be done for a variety of reasons, such as to increase yield, lengthen or shorten maturities, to take a profit, or to increase investment quality. The purchase transaction and the sale transaction must each be recorded separately and any losses or gains on the sale must be recorded. VIII PORTFOLIO ADJUSTMENTS Should an investment percentage-of-portfolio limitation be exceeded due to an incident such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the Treasurer shall consider reconstructing the portfolio basing his or her decision, in part, on the expected length of time the portfolio will be unbalanced. IX POLICY REVIEW This investment policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic trends. The City Council shall be responsible for maintaining guidance over this investment policy to ensure that the City can adapt readily to changing market conditions, and shall approve any modification to the investment policy prior to implementation. STATE LAW The legislated authority of the Fund is covered in Sections 53601, 53635 and 53646 of the Government Code. Enclosed are copies of the statutes which determine the maximum parameters of the Fund. It is the policy of the City Treasurer to comply with the State laws governing the Fund. R:INORTONLb~GENDA$11NVSTt~LC.A~N 6 ITEM"5 APPROVAl C TY A'rTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~T~ CITY MANAGER)'~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: DATE: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: Accept Offers of Dedication for Street, Utility and Services Purposes Within Parcel Maps No. 4646 and 28084 for Portions of Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and Remington Avenue ~.~,~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer- Land Development Larry D. Cooley, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET, UTILITY AND SERVICES PURPOSES WITHIN PARCEL MAPS NO. 4646 AND 28084 BUT NOT ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM. BACKGROUND: As standard conditions for final maps and associated development, frontage right-of-way is required to be dedicated to centerline plus six feet. Phased Final Maps of TPM 24085, owned by Mr. Bill Dendy of Westside City II and Westside Business Centre, will ultimately be the instruments for dedication of most of the half-street right-of-way fronting Zevo Drive (Avenida de Ventas), Winchester Road and Remington Avenue. However, the subject Offers of Dedication will provide offsite right-of-way necessary to complete full-street improvements of said streets. Mr. Dendy intends to complete the obligation of street improvements prior to final map approval for PM 24085-2. This final map, to be recorded in the near future, will accomodate an appproximately 225,000 square foot warehouse building in the LI Zone. Attached with the Resolution are Offers of Dedication and Legal Descriptions (Exhibit "A") and Plats (Exhibit "B") for street dedications for portions of Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and Remington Avenue, which are necessary to complete public improvements providing access to new development within TPM 24085. Westside City II and Westside Business Centre, as owners of the lands within said tentative maps, has reviewed the project plans and legal descriptions and has agreed to dedicate the necessary easements for this project. R :~.O D~ l 0\OFFERDi~D .STS IcY& The proposed street improvements for Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and Remington Avenue will not be accepted into the City maintained street system until all the street improvements have been completed and accepted by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Resolution No. 97- with Exhibits "A" and Copy of Offer of Dedication (Original on File). Location Map; Tentative Parcel Map No. 24085 R:KAGD~ 10\OFPI=IO)ED.STS le/~t RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET, UTILITY AND SERVICES PURPOSES WITItlN PARCEL MAPS NO. 4646 AND 28084, BUT NOT INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, portions of streets within underlying Parcel Maps No. 4646 and 28084, encompassing phased final maps for TPM 24085, as shown in Exhibits "A" and 'B" attached hereto, have been offered for dedication to the City by Westside City II and Westside Business Centre: and, WHI~E.~, the dedications are easements for street, utility and public services purposes and are necessary for the construction of improvements and future aceepmee into the public street system of the City of Temecula. NOW, ~RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Drive, hereto. Section 1. That the City of Temecula accepts the offers of dedication for portions of Zevo Winchester Road, and Remington Avenue described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 10th of June, 1997. A'I~EST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~G DRP'~97R~ I 0~,OFI- IaKDED.XTS [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 97- wa~ duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a reg.lar meeting thereof held on the 10th day of June, 1997, by the following vote: 0 COUNCILM]E~S: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: II:~A G DRFrLq'7X~I 0'~O FFERDED.ST$ leg~ EXqqTRIT '"A" Right-of Way Dedications for Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and Remington Avenue Offers of Dedication and Legal Descriptions R :~AG ~9'~0610~,0 e t. I:,t~)ED.,~TS Ic/~ OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSES The undersigned, being the present title owner(s) of record of the herein described parcel of land, do hereby make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and its successc or assigns, for street and highway purposes, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, Stak California, described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto. It is understood and agreed that the C]t~ of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility f6r the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or of the local governing bodies or its successors or assigns. IN WITNESS THEREOF, these pr~ents have executed this instrument The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal representatives of the respective parties hereto. Westside Business Centre, LLC Dendy Real Estate a Investment Company, Manager N..,/ ff-_cm~ame a"d Title / // STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE} On x-/-/6 - q 7 , before me the undersigned, a Nota_.ry Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved ~e on the b~is o~ salisfactory evidencc to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/arc subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she;they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacily(ies) and that by his/her/their signalare(s) on lhe inst~ment the pemon(s), or the entity uoon behalf of which the pemonls~ acled. executed the instrument. Secretary ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor .. Greek, City Clerk ,/ED AS TO FORM: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney EXHIBIT A-,f:L~O~ DESCR[P'fiO~q RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION March 11, 1997 ZEVO DRIVE A Portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 28084 That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 28084, in the City of Temeculo, County of Riverside, State of California, os shown by map on file in Book 185 of Parcel Mops, Pages 51, 52 and 5.3, Records of said Riverside County, described os follows: Beginning at the intersection of the eosterty line of said Parcel 1 with the centerline of Zevo Drive, formerly known os Avenido De Ventos; Thence along said centerline of Zevo Drive, being also along the northerly line of said Parcel 1, the following courses: South 49'06'40" West o distance of 479.2.3 feet to the beginning of o tangent curve concave northwesterly and having o radius of 800.00 feet; Southwesterly along said curve through o central angle of 28'59'45" on arc distance of 400.20 feet; Tangent to said curve South 77%6'25" West o distance of 651.6,3 feet to the beginning of o tangent curve concave southeasterly and having o radius of 500.00 feet; Southwesterly along said curve through on central angle of 12'16'14" on arc distance of 107.08 feet; Tangent to said curve South 65'50'11" West o distance of 259.85 feet to on intersection with the centerline of Winchester Rood , continuing South 65'.30'11" West o distance of 50.00 feet to the beginning of o non-tangent curve concave northeasterly and having o radius of 900.00 feet, o radial line to the beginning of said curve bears South 65'30'11" West; Thence, southeasterly along said curve through o central angle of 2'29'01" on arc distance of 39.01 feet; Thence North 65'30'11" East o distance of .309.00 feet to the beginning of o tangent curve concave southeasterly and having o radius of 461.00 feet, said curve being concentric with the hereinabove described curve having o radius of 500.00 feet; Thence northeasterly along said curve through o central angle of 12'16'14" on arc distance of 98.75 feet; Thence tangent to said curve North 77'46'25" East o distance of 651.6.3 feet to the beginning of o tangent curve concave northwesterly and having o radius of 839.00 feet, said curve being concentric with the hereinabove described curve having o radius of 800.00 feet; Thence northeasterly along said curve through o central angle of 28'59'45" on arc distance of 419.71 feet; Thence tangent to said curve North 49'06'40" East o distance of 479.2.3 feet to the aforesaid easterly line of Parcel 1; Thence North 40'53'20" West olong sold eosterly line o distonce of 59.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing o computed area of 1.75 acres, more or less. PREPARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SOUTHWEST SURVEYS CITY OF TEMECULA OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSF~ The undersigned. being the present title owner(s) of record of the herein described parcel of !and, do hereby make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and its successc or assigns, for street and highway purposes, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State California. described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto. It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibilityfor the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon or therein. until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or of the local governing bodies or its successors or assigns. The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal representatives of the respective parties hereto. Westside Business Centre, IN WITNESS Ti-~.EREOF, these pr~sen!.,s haye executed this instrument this day of /'¢/9,c,'/ , STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUN~ OF RIVERSIDE} On ~- /& - ~ ~ , before me the undemigned, a Nmar~Public in and for lhe State of California, pemonally appeared personally known to me (or proveto me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to Ihe within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacily(ies) and that by his/herllheir signature(s) on the instrument the pemon(s), ar the emitv u.on behalf of which the ~erson(sl acted. execuled instrument. LLC Dendy Real F. state & Investment Corn paj>~, Manager By:///~41 ~_j~d~ PrUdent ~ ~ Secretary ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The Cily Council. City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant or' real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: By: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: Peter M. Thorson. City Attorney EXHIBIT RIGHT OF WAY D ' IC,tTION NO. A portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 28084 Winchester Road Being a portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 28084 as shown by map on file in Book 185 of Parcel Maps, at pages 51 through 53 thereof, records of Riverside County, California, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 4646 as shown by map on file in book 6 of Parcel Maps, at page 75 thereof, records of Riverside County, California, said corner also being on the centerline of Winchester Road; Thence South 19°50'46" East along said centerline of Winchester Road, also being the northeasterly line of said Parcel 1 of said Parcel Map 28084, a distance of 798.73 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 850.00 feet; Thence continuing southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 09°18'06', an arc distance of 137.99 feet; Thence South 60°51 '08' West, a distance of 50.00 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 900.00 feet, the initial radial line bearing South 60°51 '08" West; Thence continuing northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 09~18'06", an arc distance of 146.11 feet, to a line parallel with ancl 50.00 feet southwesterly of the northerly line of said Parcel 1 of said Parcel Ma~ 28084; Thenca North 19°50'46" West, along said parallel line, a distance of 768.31 feet to the northerly line of said Parcel 1; Thence North 38°50'27" East, along said northerly line, a distance of 58.52 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel of land contains 46,279 square feet or 1.06 acres, more or less. EXP. 12/31198 Prepared for and on behalf of HLC Date ......... OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPO~E~ The undersigned, being the present title owner(s) of record of the herein d~,cribed parcel of land. do hereby make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a tx)lifical sub&vision of the State of California, and i~ successo' or assigns, for street and highway purposes, the real proper~y situated in the City of Temecula, Coumy of Riverside, Star California, described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto. It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to such offer of dedication, and shall am assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council. or of the local governing bodies or its successors or assigns. The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal representatives of the respective parties hereto. IN WITNESS THEREOF. lhese presents have executed this in.q.stm_mcnt this ///,~ ~ day of /4tp~/'?. ,19 ~" / STATE O?-CALIFORN1A } SS. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) On 7--/-/~ '- ~ ') . before me the undersigned, a NotaryPublic in ami, for the State of California, personally appeared satisfactory evidence to be the p~Yrson(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted. executed the instrument. al~a~ 1 ~"~'~ ,.~sar~-vao~ Comm. #1059230 I~ ~ . ~ .~,MayaL1O~ ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE Westside City Ii Dendy Real Estate & Investment ComE~ny, Manager . ~ il~~n~ ~e id~~./~ The City Council. City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: By: Patricia H. Birdsall. Mayor BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: Peter M. Thorson. City Attorney RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION A Portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 4646 Remington Avenue Being a portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 46~16 as shown by map on file in book 6 of Parcel Maps, at page 75 thereof, records of Riverside County, California, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Parcel 2, being on the centerline of Winchester Roadl Thence North lg°50'46" West along said centerline of Winchester Road, also being the soutt~#esterly line of said Parcel 2; a distance of 175.00 feet to the Point of Beginning Thence North 19°50'46" West, continuing along said southwesterly line, a distance of 57.00 feetl Thence North 70°0g'14" East, a distance of 50.00 feet; Thence South 63037'38' East, a distance of 33.24 feet; Thence North 70°09'14" East, a distance of 65.00 feet to tt~e beginning of a tangent curve, concave southerly, having a radius of 839.00 feet; Thence continuing easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 20°52'31", an arc distance of 305.68 feet; Thence South 88°58'15" East, a distance of 41 37 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 761.00 feet; Thence continuing easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 24°31 '23', an arc distance of 325.71 feet, to a line parallel with and 39.00 feet northwesterly of the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; Thence North 66030'22' East, along said parallel line, a distance of 433.25 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1961.00 feet; Thence leaving said parallel line and continuing northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 21°23'39"1 an arc distance of 732.23 feet, to a line parallel with and 39.00 feet northwesterly of the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; Thence North 45006'43" East, along said parallel line, a distance of 693.30 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave northwesterly, hav,ng a radius of 761.00 feet; Thence leaving said parallel line and continuing northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 07°51'35", an arc distance of 104.39 feet Thence North 37015'08" East, a distance of 72.27 feet; Thence North 08°34'11" West, a. distance of 33.00 feet to the southwesterly line of Diaz Road, 100.00 feet in width, 50.00 feet on eact3 side of centerline, as shown on said Parcel Map 4646, being the beginning of a non tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 4330.00 feet, the initial radial line bearing South 38004'53" West; SHEET 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION Thence continuing southeasterly along said curve and said southwesterly line, through a central angle of 00°45'00", an arc distance of' 56.67 feet; Thence leaving said southwesterly line, South 37°15'08' West, a distance of 94.82 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 794.00 feet; Thence continuing southwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 07°51 '35", an arc distance of 108.92 feet to a line parallel with and 6.00 feet northwesterly of the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; Thence South 45006'43" West, along said parallet line, a distance of 693.30 feat to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1994.00 feet; Thence leaving said parallel line and continuing southwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 21023'39", an arc distance of 744.56 feet, to a line parallel with and 6.00 feet northwesterly of the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; Thence South 66°30'22" West, along said parallel line, a distance of 433.25 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 794.00 feet; Thence continuing westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 24°31 '23', an arc distance of 339.84 feet; Thence North 88°58'15' West, a distance of 41.37 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 806.00 feet; Thence continuing westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 20°52'31", an arc distance of 293.66 feet; Thence South 70°09'14" West, a distance of 138.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above tiescribed parcel of land contains 96,729 square feet or 2.22 acres, more or less. Damn P. Ginn, LS 7075 EXP. 12131198 Prepared for and on behalf of HLC SHEET 2 OF 2 Right-of Way Dedications for Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and Remington Avenue Plats I~ :'~.AG DR.i~7~I~ I O\OF F~..DED. ~'T$ leila r EXHIBIT B-t~ COURSE DATA ' ~0) BEARING//~)E~'rA LENG'I~ RADIUS TANGENT 1 28'39'4-5" 4-00.20' 800' 204-.58' 2 12'16'14-" 107.08' 500' 5,3.75' N65'30'11"E 50.00' 6 28'39'45" 419.71' 859' 214.35' 7 N4.0'53'20"W 39.00' PARCEL 1 P.,M, 18,.8/70-72 /// P.O B.~ // //PCL, 1 · ' /P.,M., 17.8 / /85-'88 / PArcEL 3 P.,M., 5/75 ~ ZEVO DRIVE (FORMERLY AVENIDA DE VENTAS) SCALE: 1" = 200' Vlcm~ ~ V~]) NO SC~L~ -- N65'01'11"E(R) PARCEL 1 P.J\./J, 1..85/61-53 AREA OF RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION PREPARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SOUTHWEST SURVEYS INC. CITY OF TEMECULA P,/GEIT EXHIBIT B OF WAY DEDICATION NO. PARC~. I POINT OF BEGINNING P4RCEZ. 3 PU 6/75 PARCEL 1 P~ 28084 AREA 46,279 SF 1.06 AC INDICATES AREA OF RIGHT OF WAY DEDICA T!ON DARRIN P. GINN, L$ 7075 EXP. 12/,$I/98 PREPARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF' HLC ,I EXHIBIT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION POINT OF .BEGINNING POINT COMMENCEMENT ~ =20~52'3~"~ T = 14.8.48' L ,~ 293.66' A =,24~J1°2~ T ~= 172.56' ~. = 3~9.~'_ 20"52'31' 839.00' 154.56' 305.68' ~ " 24'31'23' R '= 761.00' T -, 165.39' j..- z2~.~' PARCEL 2 6/z5 AR~'A 2.22 AC PARCEL 3 PM 6/75 FUTURE REMINGTON A VENUE, 78' RW 21~3'39" 1994.00' 376.67' 744.56' '~ =, 21"25'39' R =, 1961.00' T ,= 370.43' L - 732.23' VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Z~/BEARiH~U .f ~!- DA 'I A NO. RADIUS LENGTH TAN N70~9'14'E 50.00' S63'37'38'E 33.24' 3 N70'Og'14'E 65.00' ,~ .~,-q~a';5'F 41.37' 07'51'35-- 781.00' 104.3g' 52..28' N37'IS'OS'E 72.27' NOS'34'11'W 33.00' 10 07-~1'35' 794.00' 108.92' 11 N88 .?~8'15"W 41.37, 12 S70'09'~4'W 158.00' 13 N19.~O°46'W 57.00' 28.3 54.5~ INDICATES AREA OF* WAY DEDICATION OARRIN P. GINN, I.S 7075 EXP. 12/31/98 PRE~°ARED FOR AND ON BEHALF' OF HLC TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRr)VA! ~f~ CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE DIRECI[GJ~'~ CITY MANAGER ~ .. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-2. (Northwesterly corner of Intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road). PREPARED BY: ~Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development /~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 22915-2, AUTHORIZE the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On May 8, 1990, the Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 22915-2 on behalf of the City of Temecula. Subdivision Agreements and Surety Bonds were submitted by: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow & Costain Homes, Inc.) for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted by American Home Assurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. PB 300 11 964 in the amount of $1,792,000 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. PB300 11 964 in the amount of $109,500 to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB 300 12 677 in the amount of $185,500 to cover sewer improvements. 4.. Bond No. PB 300 11 965 in the amount of $40,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. Bonds No. PB 300 11 964 in the total amount of $1,043,750 to cover materials and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. R:~,AGDRPT~97~0610\TR2291 $2.ACC Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The subject Tract 22916-3 was one of three for which Costain Homes Inc. became the sole developer. Costain Homes Inc. executed a new agreement and substituted new bonds in the full amount. On June 14, 1994, the City Council authorized partial reduction in the faithful performance security amounts, and accepted the following substituted bond in the appropriate reduced amounts as posted by American Motorists Insurance Company: Bond No. 3SM 802 895 00 in the total amount of $730,625 for Faithful Performance for streets, water and sewer improvements. The subdivider also posted replacement bonds for the full amount for the following items: Bond No. 3SM 802 895 00 in the total amount of $1,043,750 for Labor and Materials for streets, water, and sewer improvements. Bond No. 3SM 802 669 00 in the amount of $40,000 for subdivision monumentation. The work has now been completed and Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts, and the Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation Districts have accepted their items of work. Public Works Staff therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance security to the following ten- percent (10%) warranty amount: Street, water, and sewer improvements Bond No. 3SM 802 895 00 $179,250 The subdivision monumentation requirements have been met, and Staff therefore recommends release of the following security: Bond No. 3SM 802 669 00 in the amount of $40,000 for subdivision monumentation. The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets within the subdivision to be accepted are Camino Casana, Corte Lara, Corte Palacio, Via Baldarama, and portions of Camino Nunez, Rancho Vista Road, Via Valdez, and Butterfield Stage Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map R:~AGDRPT~97\O610~TR229152.ACC VICINITY MAP Tract Map No. ~915-~ i-~oca_tion,Man NOTE~: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,E . · .. . , I'I'EM 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRnVA! CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tracts No. 22915-2 and 22915-3). (Southwesterly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road) PREPARED BY:/~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM, {WITHIN TRACTS NO. 22915-2 AND 22915-3) BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tracts No. 22915-2 and 22915-3 on May 8, 1990, on behalf of the City of Temecula and entered into Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, water and sewer improvements with Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes Inc.), now Costain Homes Inc. The City Council accepted the public improvements for these tracts on June 10, 1997. The public streets now being accepted by this action are: Tract No. 22915-2: Corte Palacio, Via Baldarama, Corte Lara, Camino Casana, and portions of Via Vasquez, Camino Nunez, Rancho Vista Road, and Butterfield Stage Road. Tract No. 22915-3: Corte Fiorecita, and portions of Camino De La Torre and Camino Nunez. R:~AGDRPT~97~0610\TR229152.3ST FISCAl IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. AttAchments: Resolution No. 97- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. R:~AGDRPT~97\06! 0\TR229152.3ST RESOLUTION NO. ~/- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEM~-~0LA ACCEl'lING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO ~ CITY IN AINED-STRI~T SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 229152 AND 22915-3 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~vITzCULA DOES RESOLVE, DE'rERM]NE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of the City of Temecula, accepted offers of dedication of ~ lots for public road and public utility purposes made by Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes Inc.), now Costain Homes Inc., with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 22915-2 and 22915-3; and, WHb'~EAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tracts No 22915-2 and 22915-3 on June 10, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVe, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits 'A' and 'B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATI'F~T: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~AGDRPT~97~0610~TR229152.3ST [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMEC~A ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 97- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of June, 1997, by the following vote: 0 COUNCILNIF3VIBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCIL~ERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL~F. RS: R:~AGDRPT~97~O610~TR229152.3ST r EXHIB~ "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 97- Acce__pting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temeodn as indicated on Tract Maps No. 22915-2 and 22915- 3, and acee__.pting subject public streets into the City Maintained- Street System as described below: Tract M~tp No. 2~91 5.~: Those lots described as Lots "A" through 'H", as shown on Tract Map No. 22915.2, filed on the 8th of May, 1990, in Book 217 of Maps, Pgs $1-59 inclusive, further described as follows: Lot "A"* Lot "B" Lot 'C' Lot"D" Lot 'E" Lot 'F" LOt "G" Lot "H" Portion of Butterfield Stage Road Portion of Rancho Vista Road Via Baldarama Cnmlno Casana Corte Lara Corte Palncio Portion of Via Vasquez Portion of Camino Nunez Tract M~p No. ~915.3: Those lots described as LOts "B", 'C", and "D" as shown on Tract Map No. 22915.3, filed on the 8th of May, 1990, in Book 217 of Maps, Pgs 60-66 inclusive, further described as follows: Lot "A'** Lot "B" Lot "C" Lot "D" Portion of Meadows Parkway Corte Florecita Portion of Camino Nunez Portion of Camino De La Torre * Butterfield Stage Road was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 95-29 on March 28, 1995. ** Meadows Parkway will not be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System until Community Facilities District No. 88-3 and Assessment District No. 159 accept their portions of the improvements. R:~AGDRI=T~97\O610~.TR229152.3ST F.~H~IT ~B~ TO RESOLITrION NO. 97- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE -PUBLIC S~S INTO ~ CITY MAINT~S~ET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: VICINITY MAP NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE I J~.GEND STREETS OR PORTIONS OF ~ TO BE ACCEFI'ED INTO CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM APPRt~VA! CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DI"EC~O~.~ CITY MANAGER J~' ~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager - Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-3. (Southwesterly corner of Intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road). PREPARED BY: /'~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development ' Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 22915-3, AUTHORIZE the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On May 8, 1990, the Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 22915-2 on behalf of the City of Temecula. Subdivision Agreements and Surety Bonds were submitted by: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow & Costain Homes, Inc.) for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted by American Home Assurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $907,000 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $67,000 to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $110,000 to cover sewer improvements. 4.. Bond No. PB 300 11 968 in the amount of $26,400 to cover subdivision monumentation. Bonds No. PB 300 11 967 in the total amount of $542,000 to cover materials and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. R:~GDRP'T~97~0610~TR220153.ACC Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The subject Tract 22915-3 was one of three for which Costain Homes Inc. became the sole developer. Costain Homes Inc. executed a new agreement and substituted new bonds in the full amount. On June 14, 1994, the City Council authorized partial reduction in the faithful performance security amounts, and accepted the following substituted bond in the appropriate reduced amount as posted by American Motorists insurance Company: Bond No. 3SM 802 894 00 in the total amount of $504,200 for Faithful Performance for streets, water and sewer improvements. The subdivider also posted replacement bonds for the full amount for the following items: Bond No. 3SM 802 894 O0 in the total amount of $542,000 for Labor and Materials for streets, water, and sewer improvements. Bond No. 3SM 802 670 00 in the amount of $26,400 for subdivision monumentation. The work has now been completed and Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts, and the Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation Districts have accepted their items of work. Public Works Staff therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance security to the following ten- percent (10%) warranty amount: Street, water, and sewer improvements Bond No. 3SM 802 894 00 $108,400 The subdivision monumentation requirements have been met, and Staff therefore recommends release of the following security: Bond No. 3SM 802 670 00 in the amount of $26,400 for subdivision monumentation. The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets within the subdivision to be accepted are Corte Florecita, and portions of Camino Nunez, and Camino De La Torre. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map R:~a, GDRFT~97~0610~TR229153.ACC MAP Tract Man No. Location Mag NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALP. · ,.. · , fI~EM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRnVAI CITY ATTORNEY AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 Release Warranty and Labor and Materials Bonds in Tract No. 23126. (Southerly of Intersection of Nicolas Road at Roripaugh Road) PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development ~' Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders for Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Improvements, and the Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 23126, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. BACKGROUND: On November 7, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Barratt American Incorporated, c/o Coscan Davidson Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The American Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 11127029103 in the amount of $111,500 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. 11127029111 in the amount of $22,000 to cover water system improvements. 3. Bond No. 11127029129 in the amount of $24,000 to cover sewer system improvements. Bonds No. 11127029103, 11127029111, and 11127029129 in the amount of $55,750, $11,000, and $12,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. r.~agdq=t\97~0610\tr23126f.inl 5. Bond No. 11127029137 in the amount of $9,800 to cover subdivision monumentation. On February 13, 1996, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one- year warranty period, authorized release of the subdivision monumentation bond, and accepted the faithful performance bond riders, changing the obligee' from Riverside County to the City of Temecula, and reducing the bond amounts for Faithful Performance warranty purposes to the following amounts: Street and Drainage Improvements Bond No. 11127029103 Water System Improvements Bond No. 11127029111 Sewer System Improvements Bond No. 11127029129 $11,150 $ 2,200 $ 2,400 Public Works staff has reviewed the project in the field and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. Staff therefore recommends the release of the Faithful Performance warranty securities. The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. No claims having been filed against the developer for either labor or materials, Staff recommends the release of the following labor and materials bonds: Street and Drainage Improvements Water System Improvements Sewer System Improvements Bond No. 11127029103 Bond No. 11127029111 Bond No. 11127029129 $55,750 $11,000 $12,000 The affected street, Sweet Brier Circle, was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 96-14. FISCAL IMPACT: None AttAchment: Location Map r:.\egdrpt~97\0610\t~23126f.inl ~0 ,J I$ VZCZNZ TY NAP TRACT NO. 23126 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager APPRnVA! CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~~ CITY MANAGERial_ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 27827-3 (Northwesterly of intersection of North General Kearny Road at Nicolas Road) PREPARED BY: /~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 27827-3, AUTHORIZE release of Faithful Performance Street and Water and Sewer System Bond amounts, release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, and initiation of the warranty period, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract Map No. 27827-3 on January 24, 1995, and entered into agreements with: Coscan Homes California, Inc., a California Corporation Doing Business as Coscan Davidson Homes. 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Suite 200 Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets, water and sewer system, and subdivision monumentation. The bonds were posted by Reliance Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. B2482393/111126 in the amount of $339,500, ($244,000, $49,000, and $46,500, respectively) for street, water and sewer system improvements. 2. Bond No. B2482393/111126 in the amount of $169,750 ($122,000, $24,500, and $23,250, respectively) for street, water and sewer system labor and materials. 3. Bond No. B2482395/111128 in the amount of $13,284 to cover subdivision monumentation. -1- r.\agd~pt~97~O61 O~tr278273.ac= Bond No. B2482394/111127 in the amount of $33,950 to cover faithful performance warranty amount. The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans: Street, Water and Sewer System improvements within Tract No 27827-3. Subdivision Monumentation. Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements and the subdivision monumentation. The Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts have accepted their items of work. The Public Works Department therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, release of the faithful performance bond and the monumentation bond, reduction in faithful performance security amounts to the 10-percent warranty level for which separate bonding was submitted at map approval, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amount as follows: Street, Water and Sewer System improvements: $305,550 and release the following bonds: Faithful Performance Subdivision Monumentation: Bond No. B2482393/111126 Bond No. B2482395/111128 $339,50O $13,284 The Faithful Performance Warranty Bond (No. B2482394/111127) will be retained in the following amount: Street, Water and Sewer System improvements: $33,950 The developer was required to post Labor and Materials Bond to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. This bond is maintained for six-months after the City Council accepts the public improvements. The public streets within this tract are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets to be accepted are portions of June Road, April Drive, Parkside Drive, and two alleys. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map -2- rAagdrpt~97\0610~tr278273.acc c! T¥ OF ?FJ'~CuLA VICINITY ~ PeR. LOT 18,1 --- rl.8. 8/3~g _-=.~?;~=g-~_L= ' ",'" ,' ,' ,'0,",,.~,,;.',.:..;~;',",-'. :-.~~I ./ .~.~ ~ ' ~ - ~ ~ ~'~*'o,-. o-- -/ ....... ~. ~'~'~~ ' ~0:o~TM l~ ~ ~._ - ...... ~ X ~- - / -, ~ ~ 1 ,b ~ ~1~ ................. / ~ ~% ~ / : ~ract MaD No. 27877=3 ",ocation Mau NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ,.~° · , I~I'EM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~O~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No. 27827-3) (Northwesterly of intersection of Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road) PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 27827-3) BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tract No. 27827-3 on January 24, 1995, and entered into Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, water and sewer system improvements and subdivision monumentation with Coscan Homes California, a California Corporation, doing business as Coscan Davidson Homes. On June 10, 1997, the City Council accepted the public improvements for this tract. The public streets now being accepted by this action are portions of June Road, Parkside Drive, April Drive, and two alleys. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 97- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. r.\agdrpt\97~0610\tr278273.~t. RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STRk'~FS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINEI~-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 27827-3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'rEMECLR.A DOES RESOLVE, D~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots for street and public utility purposes made by Coscan Homes California, a California Corporation doing business as Coscan Davidson Homes, with the recordation of Tract Map No. 27827-3; and, W!~7~F_AS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tract No 27827-3 on June 10, 1997. NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVI~D, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those meets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSK'~, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk rAegdrpt\97\0610~,tr278273.sta [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TI~V~CULA ) $$ I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 97- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of June, 1997, by the following vote: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNC]I.MEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMF_2V~ERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL~F_2,S: r.\agdmt\g7~0610~tr278273. ~IT *A~ TO RESOLUTION NO. 97- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 2782%3, and acceptin_~ subject public streets into the City M~intained-Street System as described below: Those lots described as Lots "A" through "E" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 27827-3, f'ded 10 February 1995, in Book 252 of Maps, Pgs 11-14 Incl., further described as follows: Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Portion of June Road Portion of Parkside Drive Portion of April Drive Portion of Alley Portion of Alley c~=gdrpt\97\0610\tr278273. =t= EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 97- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE -PUBLIC STREETS INTO ~ CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS I]qDICATED BELOW: ' VICINITY MAP NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE STRF..E'~ OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACCEPTED INTO CITY MAINTA~.ED-~TREET $YST'E~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPRt3VA! CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT~R.r~._~ City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 "All-Way Stop" - Calle Halcon at Eiinda Road PREPARED BY: {~)Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'ALL-WAY STOP" LOCATION ON CALLE HALCON AND ELINDA ROAD BACKGROUND: The City received a request from a resident of the area to establish an "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Calle Halcon and Eiinda Road. This request was made due to the restricted visibility caused by a relatively sharp curve on Elinda Road south of Calle Halcon. Both Calle Halcon and Elinda Road are residential streets with low traffic volumes. Although no accidents have been reported at this intersection, due to the very limited sight distance, installation of an "All-Way Stop" is recommended at this intersection. This item was reviewed by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission on May 22, 1997 and the Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing an "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Calle Halcon and Elinda Road. Some residents of the area attended this meeting and supported the proposed "Stop" sign installation. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Signs Account No. 001-164-601-5244 and Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-601-5410. Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 97- 2. Exhibit "A"- Location Map RESOLUTION NO. 9% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "ALL-WAY STOP" LOCATION ON CALLE HALCON AND ELINDA ROAD The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, the following "STOP" sign location is hereby established in the City of Temecula. Calle Halcon at Elinda Road Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 1997. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk r Aa~97X0610~-IALCO N ...qTP/tj~ [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 10th day of June, 1997 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:~drp~l ~/V~ I 0~HALCON .STP/ejp ~CMO CALiFORNiA ROAD REQUEST FOR ALL-WAY STOP I~I'EM 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVA, CITY ATTORNEY flJ4~ FINANCE DIRECT~ CITY MANAGER ~)~~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 "No Parking" Zones on Rancho California Road, Winchester Road, Pala Road, Santiago Road, Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road PREPARED BY: ~Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer- Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING" ZONES ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WINCHESTER ROAD, PALA ROAD, SANTIAGO ROAD, PAUBA ROAD AND RANCHO VISTA ROAD AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT BACKGROUND: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission directed the Traffic Division staff to review the existing on-street parking and parking restriction on the City's circulation streets for safety, consistency and operational efficiency. Staff reviewed the parking situation and recommended that parking be restricted on the following circulation streets. · Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to Moraga Road and from Margarita Road to east City limits. · Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to its westerly end. · Pala Road from SR 79(S) to Wolff Valley Road Santiago Road from Front Street to Ynez Road · Pauba Road from Ynez Road to Butterfield Stage Road · Rancho Vista Road from Ynez Road to Butterfield Stage Road -1- r:. ~ngdrpt\97\0610~nopnrkin. vtr/ajp At the April 24, 1997 meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission reviewed staff's recommendation and recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to establish no parking zones on these circulation streets. It should be noted that segments of these roadways are not currently improved to the ultimate width and will not be posted as no parking at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001- 164-601-5410. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 97- 2. Exhibit "A" - Proposed Parking Restriction -2- r:.~gdrpt\97\0610knoparkin.v~/ajp RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WINCHESTER ROAD, PALA ROAD, SANTIAGO ROAD, PAUBA ROAD AND RANCHO VISTA ROAD AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A". The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, "No Parking" zones are hereby established in the City of Temecula on Rancho Califomia Road, Winchester Road, Pala Road, Santiago Road, Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road as shown on Exhibit "A". Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -3- r:~agdrpt\97~0610~noparkin.var/ajp STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 10th day of June, 1997 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: C OUNCILMEMBERS: C OUNCILIVIEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:. \agd~t\97~0610~noparkin. var/ajp X LLI EX/~IBIT "A" ROAO ,...- · . i~iEM 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL /,'J~..~,-- CITY ATTORNEY ~'/4~ FINANCE DIREC~'?!~ .~ CITY MANAGEF~~~ CiTY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager -~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 Award of Construction Contract for Installation of an Interim Traffic Signal at State Route 79 South and Bedford Court PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects ~) All Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for installation of an interim traffic signal at State Route 79 South and Bedford Court, Project No. PW96-17 to DBX, Inc. in the amount of $89,121.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $8,912.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On March 18, 1997, the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for installation of an interim traffic signal at the intersection of State Route 79 South (SR 79(S)) and Bedford Court, Project No. PW96-17. This project includes installation of an interim three-way traffic signal and minor signing and striping at this intersection. The interim traffic signal at this intersection will be replaced upon widening of SR 79(S) by the County Assessment District 159 Phase II. This traffic signal will also be interconnected and the timing will be coordinated with the nearby traffic signal at the intersection of SR 79(S) and La Paz Street. The signal timing coordination on SR 79(S) between the intersections of Bedford Court and Pala Road is crucial in maintaining an acceptable level of service on this segment of the State Highway. R:~GDRPT~97~0610~VV98- 17 .AWDINp The engineer's estimate for this project was $110,000.00 Seven (7) bids were publicly opened on May 22, 1997, and the results for the bid are as follows: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 DBX, Inc .................................... $ 89 Computer Service Company ....................... $ 89 Paul Gardner Corp .............................. ~ 93 Peek Traffic .................................. $ 95 Leekos Electric, Inc ............................. $ 96 Sierra Pacific ................................. $ 101 HMS Construction ............................. $ 109 121.00 447.00 769.00 700.00 442.00 400.00 Staff has reviewed the bid documents for compliance with City requirements and have determined that DBX, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder for this project. DBX, Inc. has completed several other projects for the City in the past, including installation of traffic signals at SR 79(S)/Margarita Road, SR 79(S)/La Paz Street and Margarita Road/Rustic Glen Drive, with satisfactory results. The specifications allow ninety (90) working days for completion of this project. Work is expected to be completed by December, 1997. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Capital Improvement Budget Account No. 210-165-675- 5804. ATTACHMENTS: Contract R:'~AGDRPT'~7\0610M:~V96-17 .AWD/~jp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW96-17 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION A T STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD COURT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 10th day of June, 1997, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and DBX, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW96- 17 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD COURT, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard SDecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96- 17 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD COURT. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96- 17 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD COURT. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed CONTRACT r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contract.wpd/ajp completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW96-17 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD COURT All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHFDU! F. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: EIGHTY NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY ONE DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($89,121.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed NINETY (90) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. CONTRACT r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contract. wpd/ajp UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (3Oth) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000- $75,000 $75,000-$500,000 Over $500,000 RETENTION PERIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RETFNTION PERCFNTAGE 3% $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 o LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CI AIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of CONTRACT r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contrect,w13d/ajp 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAIl ING WAIFS. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. CONTRACT 4 r.\cip\projects\pw9 6\p w9 G- 1 ?\contract.wpd/ajp 16. NOTICE TO CITY OF I ABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. 17. BOOKS AND RFCORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 18. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 19. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on thedate first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR DBX, Inc. Jim Perry, President 42066 Avenida Alvarado, Suite C Temecula, California 92590 By: Jim Perry, President CONTRACT r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contract.wpd/ajp DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contract.wpd/ajp o TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager ~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 SB 312 - Adding Division 26 to the Water Code Relating to Financing a Flood Control and Prevention Program. Flood Prevention Bond Act of 1998. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING SB 312 - ADDING DIVISION 26 TO THE WATER CODE (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 79000).FLOOD PREVENTION BOND ACT OF 1998 BACKGROUND: Legislation to provide financing a flood control and prevention program known as the "Flood Prevention Bond Act of 1998", has been introduced in Sacramento. This bill, if adopted, would authorize, for the purpose of financing a flood control and prevention program, the issuance, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, sale of bonds for that purpose. The bill would require the Secretary of State to submit the bond act to the voters at the June 2, 1998, primary election. It would require a 2/3 vote for the issuance of bonds for that purpose. The bill provides for an Urban Stream Restoration Sub-account which could be of specific benefit to this area in the form of grants for various phases of the Murrieta Creek project. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Resolution No. 97- R:~,GD1LPT~7~0610~S B312BN D.ACT rh RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING SB 312 - ADDING DIVISION 26 TO THE WATER CODE (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 79000) FLOOD PREVENTION BOND ACT OF 1998 The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, SB 312 providing for financing Flood Control and Prevention Program and Flood Prevention Bond Act is being considered by State Legislature; and, WHEREAS, this legislation when adopted will pave the way for the people in California to approve funding for the Flood Control and Prevention Programs; and, WHEREAS, Portions of the City of Temecula are threatened annually by the streams nmning through the City and have frequently flooded residential and commercial areas of the City as a direct result of inadequate flood protection from Murrieta Creek and Temecula Creek; and, WHEREAS, millions of dollars in property damage has been sustained in the several recent incidents of flooding due to lack of adequate flood protection; and WHEREAS, funding of these necessary improvements on these streams to provide the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of this community is beyond the means of the local agencies; NOW, TI-W~REFORE be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Temecula support the passage of SB 312. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 10th day of June, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk l~6.GDRPT~.o~0610\SB312 BND.ACT rh [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. 9% was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 10th day of June, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk RzXAGDRFI%97~0610~SB312BND~CT rh TEMECULA COMMUN'!TY SERVICES DISTRICT o ITEM 1 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:15 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and Deputy City Clerk Susan Jones. PUBLIC COMMENT: None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Linderoans, seconded by Director Birdsall, to approve Consent Calendar Items 1 and 2. 1 Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 13, 1997. 2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended 3/31/97 for Temecula Community Services District 2.1 Review and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1997 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1997. 2.2 Approve an appropriation of $304,914 for an operating transfer from the Capital Project Fund to the City's Development Impact Fee Fund. The motion was unanimously carried. DISTRICT BUSINESS 3 Appeal of 1996-97 TCSD Rates and Charges, Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course City Attorney Peter Thorson presented the staff report. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD MAY 27, 1997 ROLL CALL: PRESENT: ABSENT: Director Lindemans questioned exempting the portion of the property located in the flood plain. Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, replied 22 acres in the flood plain was determined not to be part of the developed golf course and was therefore exempt and is consistent with previous exemptions. Paul Reed, 325 Mesa Way, San Diego, representing the applicant, stated the TCSD formula does not have a golf course classification. He stated a golf course does not have the number of customers of a commercial one (1) acre property; and a golf course utilizes a large number of acres similar to agriculture, but with low intensity usage. He asked the Board to leave the fee at .5 EDU's per acre for the 1996/97 Fiscal Year, and to find the golf course usage similar to a park or open space which cannot be developed. Director Linderoans stated the golf course is an asset to the community and wants to leave the fee at .5 EDU's. Director Birdsall stated a golf course is a commercial entity and income is generated from people using it. Director Roberts mentioned the proposed rate is consistent with the rate charged Temeku Golf Course and sees no relationship between a park which does not charge a user fee and a golf course which does charge a fee. Director Ford stated the golf course offers open space and buffering and cannot be developed as other commercial property. Director Stone stated a golf course is a commercial venture and feels 2 EDU's are appropriate for this usage. It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Roberts, to approve staff recommendation. 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DENYING THE APPEAL BY REGENCY PROPERTIES OF FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 RATES AND CHARGES LEVIED AGAINST THE TEMECULA CREEK INN City Attorney Thorson noted a change in Section 5 to state the Board considered the appeal on May 27, 1997 rather than May 13, 1997. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 DIRECTORS: NOES: 2 DIRECTORS: ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Roberts, Stone Ford, Lindemans None DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Mr. Nelson reported the Winchester Creek Park will be out to bid in July with construction to begin in early fall of 1997. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Roberts, to adjourn at 8:57 PM to a meeting on June 10, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting was unanimously carried. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk District Secretary 3 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD MAY 27, 1997 A regular meting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:57 PM at he City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Steven J. Ford presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk Susan W. Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Agency Member Lindemarts, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Items 1 and 2. 1 Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 13, 1997. 2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1997 2.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1997 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1997. 2.2 Approve the recommended budget adjustments per "Schedule A". The motion was unanimously carried. Mayor Birdsall reconvened the City Council Meeting at 8:59 PM for a Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and reconvened the Redevelopment Agency meeting at 9:00 PM. Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford None R:~Agenda~052797 I JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 Amscan Inc. Owner Participation Agreement Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:00 PM, and hearing no requests to speak, closed the public hearing at 9:00 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to approve staff recommendation. 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'rEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND AMSCAN INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION 3.2 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND AMSCAN INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION The motion carried unanimously. Mayor Birdsall recessed the City Council Meeting at 9:03 PM. AGENCY BUSINESS 4 Facade Improvement Program Amendment Agency Member .Stone stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Senior Planner Jones Meyer presented the staff report. Agency Member Birdsall clarified this work does not fall under the prevailing wage structure. R:\Agenda\052797 2 It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall, to approve staff recommendation. 4.1 Amend the Facade Improvement and Non-conforming Sign Removal Program. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Ford NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Bradley reported he, along with Agency Members Roberts and Stone, attended the ICSC Conference in Las Vegas, where the main attraction of Forest City's booth was the proposed Temecula Mall. He announced grading for the mall should begin by the end of June 1997. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to adjourn at 9:06 PM to the a meeting on June 10, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk R:\Agencla\052797 3 ITEM 2 APPROVal CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRE~TO2--~ CITY MANAGER)~"~ .?.~/~. TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: ~ SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 Contract Amendment No. 3, Project No. PW95-07, Professional Services with Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. for the Design of Phase I and Phase II of the Western Bypass Corridor, Purchase Order 17136 PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency approve Contract Amendment No. 3, and authorize the Chairperson to execute the Amendment between the City and Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $60,935.00 bringing the total contract amount to $552,203.60. The Agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form. BACKGROUND: The Agreement for Professional Services approved by the Redevelopment Agency on March 28, 1995, funded $365,843.60 for design of Phase I of the Western Bypass Corridor, the section from Front Street to Vincent Moraga Drive and the Vincent Moraga Drive extension. As authorized, Amendment No. 1 was approved on October 31, 1995, for additional work in the amount of $86,085.00 for design of a portion of Phase II of the Western Bypass Corridor, the section from Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road including the alignment for the Western Bypass Corridor bridge over crossing Rancho California Road to accommodate a grade separated intersection configuration. Thus the contract amount was adjusted to $451,928.60 and with a 10% contingency in the amount of $45,192.86 the total authorized amount was $497,121.46. Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $37,340.00 was approved on July 9, 1996, for additional preliminary geotechnical investigation, additional aerial topographic maps and detail investigation for the Western Bypass Corridor crossing at Rancho California Road, environmental documentation, provision of street light plans and the design engineer's attendance at meetings with Mr. Buffman's representatives. 1 R:~AG DR.PT~97V)610\WBPW95-4).AD3 In our joint participation with Riverside County, the Front Street and State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor intersection improvements will be included with the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange improvements. This work is scheduled to begin as soon as the property acquisition for construction of the intersection has been completed and plans have been finalized. The interchange improvement plans were complete and approved by Caltrans. However, when the City Council approved acquisition of only 12,O00 square feet the plans had to be modified and the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) lift station had to be relocated. The acquired limited area required preparation of revised legal descriptions and plats for the necessary acquisition documents and modifications to the improvement plans for relocation of the lift station. A purchase order in the amount of $2,000.00 between the City and Trans-Pacific Consultants was approved on January 2, 1997, for preparation of legal descriptions and plats in order to proceed with the property acquisition. Amendment No. 3 in the amount of $60,935.00 is for the following items: To prepare additional right-of-way documents identifying the limits of construction and slopes in the amount of $5,000.00, To revise the improvement plans to include provisions for the utilities in the amount of $19,325.00, To revise the bridge plans to incorporate a retaining wall at the abutment in the amount of 9,800.00, To make the necessary revisions to the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange bid plans as they relate to the modifications of the EMWD lift station and driveway in the amount of 9,100.00, and To make the necessary revisions to the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange bid plans for reducing acquisition to 12,000 square feet in the amount of $17,710.00. The contract amount will be $552,203.60 with approval of Amendment No. 3. The breakdown is as follows: Initial Contract Amendment No. 1 Amendment No. 2 Amendment No. 3 TOTAL $365,843.6O 86,085.00 37,340.00 2,000.00 60.935.00 $552,2O3.6O preparation of legal description and plat for the 12,000 square feet acquisition area Western Bypass Corridor is included in the current Capital Improvement Program, 2 R :~.G DRFT,,~0~ 10\W~ FW95_O. AD3 FISCAL IMPACT: $800,130.00 is available in Capital Improvement Program Account No. 210-165-612-5802 for this Professional Services contract of $491,268.60 and Amendment No. 3 in the amount of $60,935.00 for a total cost of $552,203.60. Funds are available in the Fiscal Year 1996-1997 budget. The total authorized amount was $497,121.46. Approval of this Amendment No. 3 will increase the original authorized amount by $55,082.14. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" - Amendment No. 3 - Trans-Pacific Consultants - Project No. PW95-07 3 R:~AGDRPT~97~0610\W~PW9~0.AD3 Exhibit "A" R: ~.AG DRFF\F7V~ I 0\VVB !~/95-.0. AD3 Exhibit "A" AMENDMENT NO. 3 TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. PURCHASE ORDER NO. 17136 The agreement dated July 15, 1995, between the City of Temecula and Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. (TPC) (herein referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: RE: Design of Phase I and Phase II of the Western Bypass Corridor Section 1 The Scope of Work is hereby amended to include the following in a not to exceed contract amount of $43,225.00: To prepare additional right-of-way documents identifying the limits of construction and slopes in the amount of $5,000.00, To revise the improvement plans to include provisions for the utilities in the amount of $19,325.00, To revise the bridge plans to incorporate a retaining wall at the abutment in the amount of 9,800.00, To make the necessary revisions to the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange bid plans as they relate to the modifications of the EMWD lift station and driveway in the amount of 9,100.00, and To make the necessary revisions to the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange bid plans for reducing acquisition to 12,000 square feet in the amount of $1 7,710.00. The Scope of Services are identified in Attachment No. 1 of this Exhibit "A". Section 2 Compensation shall be for all services described in this Amendment. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: Ao B. C. d. Eo Approved Contract Amendment No. 1 Amendment No. 2 Preparation of legal description and plat for the 12,000 square feet acquisition area Amendment No. 3 TOTAL $365,843.6O 86,085.00 37,340.00 2,000.00 60,935.00 $552,203.60 I R :~.GDRPI~97~0610\WB PW95-0.AD3 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement of the above written date. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: Rich Soltysiak, Director of Engineering By: Steven J. Ford, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk 2 R:',AG DR PT\97~O~ 10\WI~I~V9.~0.AD3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 R:~AGDR. Ir~9'Tl~fI 0\'W'BPWg.~-.0. AD3 Au,zust 30. 1996 Work Order .No. Z77-035.12 Amendment ,.No. City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA 92589-9033 Anention: Mr. John Pourkazemi Subject: Western Bypass Corridor Phase I and Phase II Additional Utility. Easement Dear Mr. Pourkazemi: Enclosed are two original, executed copies of our Aa¥12ENDlVI~NT FOR EXTR.< AND ADDITION:&L WORK for the Western Bypass Comdor Phase I and Phase II Additional Utitirv Easement. Please sign and date both ongmals and initial each page of the Amendment. Keep one ongmal for your files and return one to us in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope provided for your convemence. Sincerely, TRANS-PACIJ'IC CONSLrLTANTS, INC. CO.' Bob Inopea, TPC Leland Marcial, TPC File: 477-035.12 Chron C'IT;' OF- T£.~ 1£CC'£.4 .4.! I£.\:D,W£Y/T .',"0. 2 [I:O .t,'2-035 /2 EXHIB[T "A" SCOPE OF AMEN'DED SERVICES Revise plats and legal descriptions to include a 6' public utility. easement adjacent to the noaheasterly right of way line for Western Bypass Corndot between Front Street and Rancho California Road. Revise street improvement plans to show 6' =m-aded utility easement and recalculate earthwork quantities rbr Phase I and Phase r.I. Revise storm drain for Phase II. Design anct Proleer Team Drafting Prolect Engineer 1 78 I ~.ssocmre CADD Designer 115 J Assocmte Surveyor I J Project Manager } Total Fees I t Re:mbursat>les l bluelines) I I Total Amendment ~o. 3 } [ Legals 3O Total Hour~ 78 115 30 2'4 Rate/Hr I Total Cost 580 } S6.240.00 ~;65 t 57,475.00 g751 52.250.00 590t ~;2.160.00 I $18.125.00 t S1200 09 I S]9,225.0o [II. These services shall be billed on a hme and material basis not to exceed 518.125.00. REiMBURSABLFS This Amendment includes a reproduction budget in the amount of 51,200.00. Ptc.~c (nitia~ "_:'e ng ....LYE W B P 03 h'a,;v- P.tc..q.;c' (.'onv:titt:tn;,~ inc. MC. DAN! EL ENGINEERtNG October 8, 1996 Mr. Greg Aguilar Trans-Pacific Consultants _ J447 Enterprise Circle West Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Addendum for the Western Bypass Corridor Bridge over Nlurrieta Creek in the City o£Temecula - Retaining Walls at Abutment 1 Dear Greg: As previously discussed in our meeting on June 27, 1996 with you and Steve Cresswell of the City of Temeculm we indicatea mat we wui provine a proposal for me aes~gn aria (letailing of retaining walls that are required at the west abutment (abutment I). Due to conflicts with the Metropolitan Water District's 97" and 99" pipelines. the abutment location was revised, and the abutment type was revised from a short seat type, to a tall cantilevered type abutment. This required the addition of retaining walls to support the fill behind the abutment. Our original scope of work for the bridge design did not include design and detailing for these retaining walls. Based upon ~e latest information provided by Bob ionopea. we estimate that the retaining walls will have an approximate len~h of 110' and will range in heig_ht from 8' to 26'. We anticipate that Caltrans Standard Type 1, reinforced concrete retaining walls. founded on spread footings will be used. We propose to provide our engineering services which include design. derailing, quantity and quantity. check calculations, Engineefts estimate. and special provisions for the retaining walls for a fixed fee of $9,$00. If this proposal is satisfactory, you may indicate your acceptance by signing in the space provided and returning a copy to our office. We have provided a space for the City. of Temecula to initialize. Very truly yours, Ja~n~s~P E '~' ~) ~ McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. ACCEPTANCE Trans-Pacific Consultants' By: Name: Title: Date: McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. By: ,:f~--~< ~ ~,~~ Name: W. Mark Ashley Title: ~- ~ ~ -',~ --" ~ Date: October 8. 1996 City of Temecula Initials: Title: Date: 5030 Camino De La Siesta, Suite 204 · San Diego, California 92108 · (619) 5.92-1920 Fax (619) 692-0634 E-Mail: Compuserve, 102521.3714.corn LFTTFR OF TRANSMITTAL 'l'cmccula, C.'~ ')25')0 t;?,4 Tel. (')[.1) .',% - ',)(,,, Trans-lPacific .lanuarv 20, 1997 City Of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92500 We are transmitting via: Personal Delivery Attention: SUBJECT. John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer Western Bypass Comdor/l-I 5/SR79 Interchange RECEIVED CiTY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPA RTMEN 1' Dear Mr. Jolm: With this letter. we are transmitting the following as requested; l. ) One preliminary cost estimate dated January 20. 1997 tbr the revisions needed tbr I-15/SR79 South Interchange bid plans. This revisions is m response to Citv's request revise Lift Station Relocation plans to accomodate parking space for Texaco. If you have an.,,' questions or need timher inibrmation. please don't hesitate to call me at ext. 347. Sincereix', TR.ANS-PACIFIC CONSULTANTS, iNC. BoB t~opea Project Engineer Greg AgmlaL TI'C leland M.tcial .TPC Fn.412-030;23031 05 cl~run Trans -l~acific TRANSMITTAL December 20, 1996 City of Ternecula Public Works Depm tment 43174 Business Park Drive Temeoda. CA 92590 We are transmitting via: Personal Delivery Attention: Mr. John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer Subject: Western Bypass Corridor/l-15/SR79 South Interchange Dear John: · With this letter, we are transmitting the foilowing as requested: 1) One pr '~ cost estimate dated December 20, 1996 for the revisions needed for both the I-15/SR 79 South Interchange bid plans and the Westera Bypass Comdor - Phase I plans in response to the C, ity Council's decision on the fight ofway issue. If you should have any questions or need more information, please do not hesitate to contact me at ext. 265. i Sincerely, TRAN&?A~C CONSULTANTS, INC. Bob lao~s, TI~ Joe Perez, Ti~ Files: 412-030, 23031.05 Chron PRELIMINARY TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. 20-Dec-g6 I. 1-15/SR 79 SOUTH INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PLANS ACTIVITY I HRS A. REVISE IMPROVEMENT PLANS 1. REVISE LAYOUT PLAN NO. 1 2. REVISE GRADING PLAN SHTS. NO, G-1 AND G-2 3. REVISE STAGE CONSTRUCTION PLAN SC-1. SC-7, SC9, ACol I AND SC-13 REVISE PAVEMENT DELINEATION PLAN PD-1 , PD1A REVISE SIGNING PLAN S-1 AND S-1A REVISE EROSION CONTROL PLAN EC-2 7. REVISE RECLAIMED WATER SHT, 3 8. REVISE SEWER LIFT STATION SHT. 1 SUBTOTAL FOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVISIONS 12 16 6 8 8 64 COSTIHR TOTAL COST $ 85.00$ 510.00 $ 85.00$ 1,020.00 B. UPDATE QUANTITY AND ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATES $ 85.00$ 1.360.00 $ 85.00$ 340.00 $ 85.00$ 340.00 $ 85.00 $ 510.00 $ 85.00 $ 680.00 $ 85.00$ 680.00 $ 5.440.00 1. REVISE COST ESTIMATE C. REVISE LEGALS AND PLATS 1. REVISE LEGALS AND PLATS D. AGENCY COORDINATION 1. COORDINATE REVISIONS WITH CALTRANS, RCTD, COT. EMWD, RCWD AND OTHER AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES 12 85.00 $ 1,020.00 10 $ 85.00 $ 850.00 40 i 95.00 I $ 3,800.00 SUBTOTAL FOR 1-1515R795 INTERCHANGE 126 $ 11,110.00 ' II. WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR - PHASE I IMPROVEMENT PLANS 1. REVISE PLAN AND PROFILE 2. REVISE STORM DRAIN PLANS 3. REVISE COST ESTIMATE 4. REVISE RECLAIMED WATER PLAN 5. COORDINATE REVISIONS WITH COT, RCTD AND RCWD AND AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES 16 $ 85.00 16 $ 85.00 4 $ 85.00 8 $ 85.0015 16 J $ 85.00 1,360.00 1,360.00 340.00 680.00 1,360.00 SUBTOTAL FOR WESTERN BY-PASS CORRIDOR - PHASE i III. REIMBURSABLES GRAND TOTAL 36 $ 5,100.00 S 1,500.00 I $ 17,710.00 Page 1 ITEM. ~3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV ,, ' CITY ATTORNEY ~V.~ -~ FINANCE OFFICER ' IPCl, CITY MANAGER '~/~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Redevelopment Agency Members/Executive Director Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager June 10, 1997 Award of a Professional Services Contract to Westcott and McGregor and Associates for Property Management of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments Prepared By: John R. Meyer RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Board: Award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $1,600 per month to W.estcott, McGregor and Associates for property management, operation and maintenance of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments. 2. Authorize RDA Chairperson to Execute Contract. BACKGROUND On October 8, 1996 the Redevelopment Agency authorized the purchase of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments located along the west side of Pujol Street in Old Town. There is a total of 38 units in the two apartments. In order to maintain consistency in the management of the property, staff is recommending the Agency retain the services of Westcott and McGregor who has managed the property for the FDIC for the last two years. This firm has done an fine job as can be attested to by the properties' appearance and reduction in police calls. The contract is on a month to month basis until the property is rehabilitated as part of the future RDA affordable housing project. This will take a minimum of 9-12 months. The $1,600 a month covers the management of all 38 units and is the same rate paid by the FDIC. FISCAL IMPACT The average gross operating expenses are projected to be $9,005 per month (Exhibit C of the Agreement). In addition, there are several non-recurring expenses that may arise during the length of this agreement. Therefore $48,980 has been included for contingencies such as unit upgrades and renovations, legal fees and miscellaneous fees. A total of $134,000 has been proposed in the FY 97-98 RDA Low-Mod Budget (Account 165-199-201-5480 and 165-199- 202-5480). R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 613197 cad 1 Actual costs will be offset by the revenues collected from the rent. The gross revenues are currently $17,945 per month or $215,340 through the end of the agreement. Attachments: 1. Agreement - Page 4 R: \HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 c~d 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 AGREEMENT R:\HOUSING\WESTCTVT,STF 6/2/97 c~d 3 PROPERTY MANAGEMF~ SERVICES AGREF_aME~ THIS AGREEMF2qT is made as of by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency") and Westcott, McGregor & Associates, Inc., a California corporation ("Manager"). RECITALS A. Agency desires to utilize the services of Manager as an independent contractor to provide property management services to Agency as set forth in Exhibit B. B. Manager represents that it is fully qualified to perform such property management services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Manager's Services. Manager shall act as the property manager for the Agency owned properties located at 28497-28485 Pujol Street, and 28559 Pujol Street (collectively, the "Agency Properties"), in the City of Temecula, California. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by Manager are as described in Exhibit B. 2. Term of Agreement. This Contract shall take effect and shall terminate , unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 3. Compensation. a. The Agency agrees to pay Manager monthly. The amount shall not exceed Sixteen Hundred Dollars ($1,600.00) each month for the total term of this Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the Agency as provided in this Agreement. For property management services, the sum shall be $1,600.00 per month pro-rated for any partial month for which services are provided. Manager is authorized to deduct such amount each month as the first charge upon the gross monthly income received. Gross monthly income includes, without limitation, rents of all forms, tax and insurance reimbursements and other miscellaneous charges. In no event shall security deposits, the proceeds from insurance claims, condemnation or the sale of assets be classified as a portion of "gross income". b. For services not customarily a part of the usual duties required of Manager under this Agreement, Manager shall receive additional compensation in an amount to be mutually agreed upon, by both parties on a case by case basis. Any such extraordinary services requires the prior written authorization of the Agency. R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 c~ 4 4. General Terms and Conditions. The General Terms and Conditions set forth in Exhibit A are incorporated as part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between the General Terms and Conditions and any other exhibit to this Agreement, the General Terms and Conditions shall control unless it is clear from the context that both parties intend the provisions of the other exhibit to control. The provisions of Manager's proposal, if any, shall not control over the General Terms and Conditions. 5. Addresses. Agency: Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director Atto: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Manager: Dora Westcott Westcott, McGregor & Associates Inc. 2141 Palomar Airport Road, #110 Carlsbad, CA 92009 6. Exhibits. All three (3) exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WI-IEREI)F, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. REDEVELOPIVIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA Attest: By Redevelopment Agency Chairperson June S. Greek, Agency Secretary R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/'2/97 cad 5 Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, Agency Counsel Manager Dora Westcott, President R:\HOUSING\WESTCT9~.STF 6/2/97 end 6 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Status as Independent Contractor. A. Manager is, and shall at all times remain as to Agency, a wholly independent contractor. Manager shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of Agency or otherwise act on behalf of Agency as an agent. Neither Agency nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Manager or any of Manager's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Manager shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of Agency. B. Manager agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Manager under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold Agency harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against Agency by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. In the event that Agency is audited by any Federal or State agency regarding the independent contractor status of Manager and the audit in any way fails to sustain the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between Agency and Manager, then Manager agrees to reimburse Agency for all costs, including accounting and attorney's fees, arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto. C. Manager shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Manager and Manager's employees. Manager further agrees to indemnify and hold Agency harmless from any failure of Manager to comply with applicable worker's compensation laws. Agency shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Manager under this Agreement any amount due to Agency from Manager as a result of Manager's failure to promptly pay to Agency any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 1. 2. Standard of Performance. Manager shall perform all work to the highest professional standards and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the Agency Executive Director or the Agency Executive Director's designee. 3. Indemnification. Manager is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the services and duties agreed to be performed under this Agreement, and Agency is relying upon the skill and knowledge of Manager to perform those services and duties. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Manager hereby agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the Agency, the City of Temecula, and their elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, volunteers, successors, and assigns (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to any act, failure to act, error, or omission of Manager or any of its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers or their officers, agents, servants or employees, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 cad 7 connection with, resulting from, or related to this Agreement or the performance or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of the Agreement, including this indemnity provision. This indemnity provision is effective regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by Indemnitees and shall operate to fully indemnify Indemnitees against any such negligence. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against an Indemnitee shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. Manager shall pay Indemnitees for any attorneys fees and costs incurred in enforcing this indemnification provision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this instrument shall be construed to encompass (a) Indemnitees' sole negligence or willful misconduct to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(a) or (b) the contracting public agency's active negligence to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782C0). This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under the Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. Manager, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Manager regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees. In the event there is more than one (1) person or entity named in the Agreement as a Manager, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this Section 3 shall be joint and several. 4. Insurance. Manager shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California and approved by the Agency (1) a policy or policies of broad-form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts by Manager, its officers, employees, agents, and independent contractors in performance of services under this Agreement; and (2) worker's compensation insurance in the amount required by law. Agency, its officers, employees, attorneys, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) as to comprehensive general liability, property damage, and workefts compensation coverages. (1) All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non- renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through the addition of additional insureds to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving Agency thirty (30) day's prior written notice thereof. Manager agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance coverage. (2) Manager agrees that if it does not keep the insurance in full force and effect, and such R:\HOUSING\WESTCT9'7.STF 6/2/9'7 e~d 8 insurance is available at a reasonable cost, Agency may take out the necessary insurance and pay the premium thereon, and the repayment thereof shall be deemed an obligation of Manager and the cost of such insurance may be deducted, at the option of Agency, from payments due Manager. (3) Manager shall submit to Agency (i) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the worker's compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements indicating compliance with all other minimum insurance requirements above, not less that one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on Agency's appropriate standard forms entitled "Additional Insured Endorsement". 5. Confidentiality. Manager in the course of its duties may have access to confidential data of Agency, private individuals, or employees of the Agency. Manager covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Manager or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Manager without written authorization by Agency. Agency shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All Agency data shall be returned to Agency upon the termination of this Agreement. Manager's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 6. Managership of Materials. All materials, books and records, provided by Manager in the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of Agency without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by Agency. 7. Conflict of Interest. Manager covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, director or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed by Manager under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services hereunder. Manager further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Manager shall avoid the appearance of having any interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. 8. Termination. Agency may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Manager. The effective date of termination shall be upon the date specified in the notice of termination, or, in the event no date is specified, upon the thirtieth (30th) day following delivery of the notice. In the event of such termination, Agency agrees to pay Manager for services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of termination and assume responsibility for expenses incurred in compliance with the contract during the active contract period. Immediately upon receiving written notice of termination, Manager shall discontinue performing services. 9. Personnel. Manager represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this Agreement will be performed by Manager or under it supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be qualified to perform such services. Manager reserves the right to determine the R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 cad 9 assignment of its own employees to the performance of Manager's services under this Agreement, but Agency reserves the right, for good cause, to require Manager to exclude any employee from performing services on the Agency Properties. 10. Financial Condition. Prior to entering into this Agreement, Manager has submitted documentation acceptable to the Agency Executive Director, establishing that it is financially solvent, such that it can reasonably be expected to perform the services required by this Agreement. Within thirty (30) days of the furst anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement, Manager shall submit such financial information as may be appropriate to establish to the satisfaction of the Agency Executive Director that Manager is in at least as sound a financial position as was the case prior to entering into this Agreement. Financial information submitted to the Agency Executive Director shall be returned to Manager after review and shall not be retained by Agency. 11. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. A. Manager shall not discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement, and will comply with all rules and regulations of Agency relating thereto. Such nondiscrimination shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. B. Manager will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Manager state either that it is an equal opportunity employer or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. C. Manager will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement except contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. 12. Assignment. Manager shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of Manager's obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of Agency, and any attempt by Manager to so assign this Agreement or any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be void and of no effect. 13. Performance Evaluation. For any contract in effect for twelve months or longer, a written annual administrative performance evaluation shall be required within ninety (90) days of the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement. The work product required by this Agreement shall be utilized as the basis for review, and any comments or complaints received by Agency during the review period, either orally or in writing, shall be considered. Agency shall meet with Manager prior to R:\HOUSING\WESTC'r97.STF 6/2/97 cad 10 preparing the written report. If any noncompliance with the Agreement is found, Agency may direct Manager to correct the inadequacies, or, in the alternative, may terminate this Agreement as provided herein. 14. Compliance with Laws. Manager shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments. 15. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by Agency of any payment to Manager constitute or be construed as a waiver by Agency of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Manager, and the making of any such payment by Agency shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to Agency with regard to such breach or default. 16. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal or equitable action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including costs of expert witnesses and consultants. 17. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during Manager's or Agency's regular business hours or by facsimile before or during Manager's or Agency's regular business hours; or Co) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses heretofore set forth in the Agreement, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section. 18. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Manager and Agency. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. Amendments on behalf of the Agency will only be valid if signed by the Agency Executive Director or the Agency Chairperson and attested by the Agency Secretary. R: \HOUSI~G\WESTCT97.STF 612/97 cad 1 1 ~IT "B" SCOPE OF WORK Manager shall provide all services necessary to manage the Agency Properties in a prudent and businesslike manner, consistent with the highest standards for the management of rental housing. A. AGENCY PROPERTIES SHERWOOD APARTMENTS 28497-28485 Pujol Street Temecula, California 92590 PUJOL APARTMENTS 28559 Pujo! Street Temecula, California 92590 go GENERAL SERVICES Manager will train resident managers, and ensure that competent, properly trained personnel are available for Agency Properties to handle any contingency. 2. Will have personnel available to make "emergency" and non-emergency" distinctions to situations and take appropriate action 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. o Manager shall advertise the availability of units on the Agency Properties in a manner agreed upon by Manager and Agency. Manager will work diligently to procure tenants per the occupancy standards and at rental rates as approved in writing by Agency. Manager will not knowingly permit any of the dwelling units on the Agency Properties to be used on a transient basis and will not rent any such dwelling units for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive days nor allow any of the dwelling units on the Agency Properties to be leased or rented for use as a hotel, motel, dormitory, fraternity house, sorority house, rooming house, nursing home, or rest home. Manager is authorized to negotiate rental agreements on behalf of Agency for terms not to exceed month to month. The form of rental agreement used by Manager shall be subject to review and approval by the Agency Executive Director or designee. The Manager shall include provisions in such rental agreements which authorize the Manager to immediately terminate the tenancy of any Lower Income Household occupying an dwelling unit on the Agency Properties where one or more of such Lower Income Households have misrepresented any fact material to the qualification of such individual or family as a Lower Income Household and/or for qualification for occupancy of a Lower Income Unit on the Agency Properties. Each such rental agreement for a dwelling unit on the Agency Properties shall also provide that the R:\HOU$ING\WF_.STCT97.$TF 6/2/97 cad ] 2 tenants of such unit shall be subject to annual certification or recertification of income. Each such rental agreement shall also provide that the Manager will not discriminate on the base of race, creed, color, sex, national origin, ancestry, religion, marital status, age, disability or receipt of public assistance or housing assistance in connection with the rental of a dwelling unit on the Agency Properties. All applications and rental agreements entered into for such purposes concerning the Agency Properties shall contain similar non-discriminatory clauses to such effect. In addition to the conditions and restrictions confined in rental agreements, ongoing operation of the Agency Properties will be subject to certain house rules, policies and regulations. Such rules shall be developed by the Manager, and are subject to the approval of the Agency Executive Director or designee. Consistent with the provisions hereof, Manager shall establish the general policies under which the Agency Properties will operate. Such policies shall include but are not limited to resident selection criteria and priority guidelines. Such policies are subject to the approval of the Agency Executive Director or designee. Manager is authorized to sign and serve for the Agency notices to terminate the tenancies and other such notices as the Manager deems appropriate; to institute legal actions in the name of Agency to evict tenants and recover possession of the units; to recover rents and other sums due; and when expedient to setfie, compromise and release such actions or suits or reinstate such tenancies. Where legal assistance is needed for such matters as enforcing the collection of rent or eviction of a tenant, such action shall be through counsel designated or approved by Agency. Manager is authorized to appear in court on Agency's behalf, with counsel, as necessary. 10. Manager shall not knowingly permit the Agency Properties or any portion thereof to be a site for the use, generation, treatment, manufacture, storage, disposal or transportation of hazardous materials (as defined herein) or otherwise knowingly permit the presence of lm?oydous materials in, on or under the Agency Properties. "Hazardous materials" shall mean any "hazardous substance" as defined in state or federal law, any "hazardous water," "infectious waste" or "hazardous material" under federal law or under the California Health and Safety Code or the California Water Code. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "hazardous materials" shall not include ordinary construction and/or rehabilitation materials, gardening materials, household products, office supply products or janitorial supply products customarily used in the rehabilitation, maintenance or management of residential apartment projects or associated buildings and grounds, or typically used in residential activities in a manner typical of other residential developments which are comparable to the Agency Propert/es, so long as the same are maintained, used and stored in commercially normal fashion. R:\HOUSING\WF~TC-'T97.s'rF 6/2/97 e~d 1 3 The Agency shall indemnify, defend and save Manager and Manager's respective officers, directors, shareholders and employees harmless from and against any and all of the costs (including attorneys' fees), penalties and charges assessed against or imposed upon Manager by reason of the Agency or any third party keeping on or around the Project, whether prior or subsequent to the date of this Agreement, for use, disposal, treatment, generation, storage or sale of any substances, wastes, or materials designated as, or containing components designated as haTardous, dangerous, toxic or harmful and/or which are subject to regulation by any federal, state or local law, regulation, statue or ordinance (collectively the "Hazardous Substances"). The Agency shall be exclusively liable for any clean-up, monitoring, reporting, civil or criminal penalties, charges, fees or expenses (including attorney's fees or costs) with respect to the Hazardous Substances, and Agency shall indemnify and defend Manager against same. Manager shall immediately notify Agency should he/she have any knowledge of the presence or storage of any hazardous substances on the property. C. INCOME AND DISBURSEMENTS Manager shall prepare and submit to Agency a proposed Operating Budget for the Agency Properties, to include capital expenditures, for the forthcoming year concurrent with the execution of this document for the current fiscal year, and not hter than June 1st of each year the contract is in effect. The approved budget shall be the basis for operating the Agency Properties during the ensuing year. Upon approval of the budget by the Agency, Manager shall use all reasonable efforts to ensure that the operating and capital expenditures shall not exceed the approved budget. The approved budget for the period December 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997 is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 2. Rent and Security Deposits. Manager will collect rents, security deposits and all other receipts and deposit such monies into Manager's operating account to be held at an F.D.I.C. insured banking institution. Upon termination of the tenancy by the tenant or Manager, Manager shall disburse the security deposit appropriate at the termination of the tenancy. Security Deposit refunds, if any, shall be made to tenants within 23 days or the time prescribed by law. Manager is not liable for tenant damages, including unpaid rent, which exceed the security deposit. Co If the rental agreement contains a "Late Fee" charge, Manager shall be entitled to such fee as additional compensation for the additional time and expenses of collecting the delinquent rental payment. Late fee charges shall not exceed $25.00. R:~qOUSING\WESTC'IX~.STF 6/2/97 cad 14 3. Disbursements. ao Manager shall pay from gross receipts all operating expenses and such other expenses as are set forth in the approved operating budget, or as may be authorized in writing by the Agency Executive Director or designee. bo No disbursement of Agency funds shall be made unless consistent with a line item on the approved budget. No disbursement which exceeds $1,000 can be made without the prior written approval of the Agency Executive Director or designee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, emergency repairs in excess of this amount can be made, if the Manager deems such expenditures are necessary for the immediate protection of the Agency Properties from damage or persons from injury. Agency shall reimburse Manager promptly for any monies which Manager may elect to advance for the account of Agency. Nothing herein contained, however, shall be const_rued to obligate Manager to make any such advances. do Agency assumes full responsibility for the payment of any expenses and obligations incurred in connection with the proper and reasonable exercise of the Manager's duties set forth in this Agreement, to the extent such expenses are included in the approved budget or otherwise authorized by the Agency Executive Director or designee. Manager shall not pay from the Agency account interest or amortization on mortgages, taxes or assessment unless Agency, in writing, directs Agent to do so. Any excess of a $3,000 ledger balance in the operating account for each Agency Property at the end of any calendar month shall be forwarded to the Agency along with the Manager's submission of financial reports for the preceding month pursuant to Section E of this Agreement. D. REPAIRS, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE CONTRACTS Manager shall do everything reasonably necessary for the proper management of the Agency Properties, including periodic inspections, the supervision of cleaning and maintenance and arranging for such improvements, alterations and repairs as may be required of Agency. Manager shall maintain and preserve the Agency Properties in good condition and repair. Manager shall not remove, demolish or substantially alter any of the improvements in the Agency Properties without the prior written consent of the Agency Executive Director or designee, other than to make repairs in the ordinary R:\HOUSING\WESTC"rg~.$TF 6/2/97 cad ] ~ course of business and as have been set forth in the approved annual operating budget, which repairs shall serve to preserve or increase the value of the Agency Properties. Manager shall cause to be completed promptly and in good and workmanlike manner the rehabilitation of any improvements which may now or hereinafter be constructed on the Agency Properties and shall promptly restore in like manner any improvement which may be damaged or destroyed therein from any cause whatsoever. Manager shall comply with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, covenants, conditions, restrictions and orders of any governmental authority now or hereinafter affecting the conduct or operation of the Agency Properties or requiring any alteration or improvement to be made thereon. Manager shall not commit, suffer or permit any act to be done in, on or upon the Agency Properties or any part thereof in violation of any such laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or orders. Manager shall establish and continuously conduct an ongoing maintenance program, which shall include the following: (a) Scheduled preventative maintenance and repair of installed equipment in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations. (b) Routine repairs to kitchen appliances, electrical, plumbing and heating equipment. (c) Preventative annual dwelling unit inspections to regularly and consistently ascertain the condition of each dwelling unit. (d) Preventative regular inspections of common areas and equipment as well as regular schedules (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, etc.) for maintaining the same. This will include maintenance of exterior areas to keep grounds free of litter, trash and paper. Parking areas will be maintained in good repair and free from dirt and litter. Common areas such as hallways and laundry rooms will be swept and cleaned daily and kept free of trash and other debris. Garbage removal will be effected through arrangements with a contractor. The trash areas will be swept daily. Extermination services will be contracted with to provide a high level of sanitation and cleanliness. (e) Contracting with a landscape firm to maintain the landscaped areas in an attractive and healthy condition. (f) Interior painting and redecorafion of individual dwelling units shall occur every three to five years based on need, substantiated by the annual physical inspection, or as occupancy changes, or as the Manager or its management agent may otherwise deem necessary. (g) Manager will employ a maintenance work order procedure in the Agency R:~-IOUSING\WESTCT97.$TI~ 6/'2197 cad 1 6 Properties to adequately document requests for work and promptness within which the work has been completed. Ordinarily, it is anticipated that routine maintenance requests will be reasonably completed within 72 hours. Manager agrees to execute contracts for utilities, maintenance and safety of the Agency Properties as the Manager deems necessary or advisable. Agency gives Manager authority to execute contracts not to exceed one month and the amount payable not to exceed one month and the amount payable shall not exceed $1,000 per month without written permission of the Agency. Agency agrees to assume the obligation of any contract so entered into at the termination of this Agreement. E. RECORDS AND REPORTS Manager shall maintain accurate records of all monies received and disbursed in connection with its management of the Agency Properties. The records shall be open for inspection by Agency during regular business hours upon reasonable notice. Manager shall submit monthly statements of all receipts and disbursements on or about the 15th day of the following month. The monthly statement shall include documentation of the relationship of those receipts and disbursements to a line item on the approved budget, or if none, an explanation of why not. Manager shall submit an annual report (the "Annual Report") to the Agency. The Annual Report shall include for each rental unit the rental rate and the income and family size of the occupants. The income information shall be supplied by the tenant in a certified statement on a form provided by the Agency. The Participant shall submit the Annual Report prior to June 30 of each year, for the preceding fiscal year. F. OCCUPANCY STANDARDS AND PREFERENCES Manager will use due diligence in the screening and selection of tenants and abide by all fair housing laws. As vacancies occur, all units on the Agency Properties shall be rented to Lower Income Households as their principal residence at rents that do not exceed the lower of those rents prescribed by either Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code or, to the extent that the terms of Federal financial assistance are u 'ulized, such rents as are prescribed by the terms of such financial assistance (the "Affordable Rents"). (a) The maximum monthly Affordable Rent for each unit shall be established at one- twelfth (1/12) of the product of thirty percent (30%) times sixty percent (60%) of the Riverside County median income, adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit, as R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 612197 ~ad 1 7 determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, less a utility allowance as provided by the Riverside County Housing Authority for the Temecula area for the Section 8 Rental Subsidy Programs. (b) As used in this Agreement "Lower Income Households" means households earning not more than eighty percent (80%) of the Riverside County median income, adjusted for family size, as determined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. 3. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33411.3, if the Agency refers to Manager prospective tenants who are displaced by implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, or any other redevelopment project of the Agency, such tenants (if otherwise qualified), shall be granted priority over other applicants in the rental of available units on the Agency Properties. R:U-Iousn~o\v, rF. STCT97.STF 6;2/97 ~,d 1 8 EXHIBIT SHERWOOD APARTMENTS OPERATING EXPENSE BUDGET FOR THE YEAR ENDRD JUNE 30, 1998 (Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of this Budget) Recurring Operating Expenses: Monthly Average 12 Month Advertising Grounds Maintenance Repairs & Maintenance Property Management Fees On-Site Management Fees Misc. Operating Expenses Other Contractual Services Utilities (Note 1) $ 60.00 800.00 1,850.00 1,000.00 100.00 185.00 600.00 795.00 $5,390.00 $ 720.00 9,600.00 22,200.00 12,000.00 1,200.00 2,220.00 7,200.00 9,540.00 $64,680.00 Non-Recurring Expenses: Extraordinary Damage Reserve (Note 2) Six (6) Future Renovations (Note 3) Legal Fees (Note 4) Miscellaneous Expenses $1,750.00 175.00 50.00 $1,975.00 $ 5,500.00 21,000.00 2,100.00 600.00 $ 29,200.00 Note (1) - This item includes trash collection and pest control. Note (2) - A contingency reserve has been allocated to cover possible future damages. Note (3) - An estimate of six (6) renovations due to vacancies has been provided for in this Budget based upon the average maximum necessary expenditure required to prepare a unit for rental. Based upon past experience, there is no way to accurately predict the condition of a unit upon a temnt's moveout. This estimate may prove to be too low based on actual future occurrences. Note (4) - Legal fees are predicted upon three (3) legal actions being required. Future costs may vary based upon differing requirements for legal actions. As a policy, Management prefers that tenants move out as expeditiously as possible avoiding legal action. Note (5) - No provision has been made for the cost of a new roof on both buildings. Estimates obtained previously place the replacement at between approximately $12,000 and $18,000. Note (6) - No provision has been made for any expenses relative to the large subterranean cavity in the driveway and garage area. There is no way to accurately assess potential damages. R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6;2197 cad 1 9 EXItlBIT 'C' PUJOL APARTMENTS OPERATING EXPENSE BUDGET FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 (Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of this Budget) Recumng Operating Expenses: Monthly Average 12 Month Advertising Grounds Maintenance Repairs & Maintenance Property Management Fees On-Site Management Fees Misc. Operating Expenses Other Contractual Service (Note 1) Utilities $ 40.00 600.00 750.00 600.00 350.00 200.00 500.00 69.5.00 $ 3,615.00 $ 480.00 7 200.00 9 000.00 7 200.00 4 200.00 2 400.00 6 000.00 7,500.00 $ 43,980.00 Non-Recurring Expenses: Extraordinary Damage Reserve (Note 2) Four (4) Future Renovations (Note 3) Legal Fees (Note 4) Miscellaneous Expenses $1,167.00 84.00 65.00 $1,316.00 $ 4,000.00 14,000.00 1,000.00 780.00 $19,780.00 Note (1) - This item includes trash collection and pest control. Note (2) - A contingency reserve has been allocated to cover possible future damages. Note (3) - An estimate of four (4) renovations due to vacancies has been provided for in this Budget based upon the average maximum necessary expenditure required to prepare a unit for rental. Based upon past experience, there is no way to accurately predict the condition of a unit upon a tenant's move out. This estimate may prove to be too low based on actual future occurrences. Note (4) - Legal fees are predicted upon two (2) legal actions being required. Future costs may vary based upon differing requirements for legal actions. As a policy, Management prefers that tenants move out as expeditiously as possible avoiding legal action. R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 cad 20 . ... . , I'I'EM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl ~,, ,,.,,..- CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIN~N-iE CITY MANAGER ' TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager June 10, 1997 FY1997/98 Economic Development Strategic Plan RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members: 1) Review the FY1997/98 Economic Development Strategic Plan update; Review and approve the FY1997/98 Marketing Plan; 3) Review and provide direction regarding the funding request of: a) b) c) Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation Temecula Valley Film Council; DISCUSSION: On February 21, 1995, the City Council adopted the first Economic Development Strategic Plan. This plan was based on the goals set forth in the General Plan and the Economic Development Element (Attachment A). The Plan encouraged attraction, retention, and marketing efforts to expand the City's industrial base. Since that time, staff has prepared updates to the plan based on current conditions. This report will provide 1997/98 plan updates. The basic elements remain in the plan. Additionally, for the first time. we have data concerning existing businesses and their labor force. r :\eyersk\edcatrat.98 I Fm01oyment rl~t, Each quarter, the City now receives employment reports which provide data on the history of our job base and the distribution of jobs by sector. From 1995 to 1996, the number of manufacturing jobs increased by 174 (3.7%). The manufacturing sector represents 27.7% of total jobs. It is interesting to note that the average pay for this sector is higher than the regional average ($34,700 vs. $29,000) indicating that the quality of our jobs is higher than average for the region. Additionally, studies are being prepared to determine labor needs of existing businesses to focus efforts of education. For example, we have identified a need for tool and diemakers and Mount San Jacinto College is preparing a program for this training. We are also providing curriculum input to the Temecula Valley Unified School District through the TEAM Program. We are updating the labor market survey which was done in 1994. This data will be provided to companies looking to expand or relocate. Marketing PlAn The 1997-98 update is included as Attachment C. The plan has proven extremely beneficial in the planning and success of our economic development and tourism efforts that have occurred in the Temecula Valley. The success to promote Temecula in both areas are self- evident. Many businesses have located and expanded in Temecula over the past several years, thus, creating more local manufacturing jobs. Also, the tourism activity has expanded as indicated by increased attendance at special events as well as increased tourism exposure in all areas of the media. The City has received substantial publicity and exposure in publications such as the Los Angeles Times, AAA Avenues and Buzz Weekly. Staff relies heavily on the "purchased" services we receive from the Chamber and the EDC, particularly the leveraging from the numerous volunteer hours received. In addition, the City works with other local, county and statewide agencies to accelerate business development and tourism activities through publicity, trade shows, public events, direct mail, real estate and industry outreach. This cooperative approach to improving upon our economic development and tourism efforts, has allowed the City to accomplish measurable results with a cost-effective marketing program. MARKETING PLAN STATUS Business Development Exhibit I Lead Agency Outreach Materials A. Business Development Kit - Reprint B. City of Temecula Fact Book (Demographics) Update C. Business Testimonial Piece To Do New To Do City City City r:~syer~k\edcstrat .98 2 III IV V Vl Direct Mail Literature CD Rom - Update Photography Library Corn,oleted City of Temecula Business Brochure Business Development Kit City of Temecula Fact Book (Demographics) CD Rom Selected Industry Outreach A. Review EDC Research on Individual Temecula Companies B. Research Specific Industry Communications C. Develop & Implement Tactics for Each Industry Trade Show Participation D. Retention Committee for Community Business E. Reception Committee for Businesses F. Site Selectors Industrial Tour G. Business Outreach - Golf/Lodging Industry H. "The Right Fit" Direct Mail Program Completed Temecula RNC Host Committee Trade Show Participation Regionel Business Media Outreach A. Press Materials B. Establish Working News Bureau Real Estate Outreach A. Outreach to Commercial Brokers, Builders and Lenders (i.e. Real Estate Audience Newsletter) B. Outreach to Business Relocation Consultants Selected Advertising A. Develop Print Ad B. Identify Advertising Venues and Buy Media Completed Developed Business Print Ad Advertised in Business Publication and Newspaper Community Relations A. Schedule City Speaking Opportunities B. Schedule Media Roundtables with Press Enterprise, Rancho News, KRTM-FM and the Californian New On Going On Going On Going On Going On Going On Going On Going New On Going In Process On Going On Going On Going On Going New On Going On Going City City/EDC City City City EDC City/EDC City City City/EDC EDC Chamber City City City N/A City/EDC City City City City City City City City City City r:\syer~k\edc~tr~t .98 3 VII III IV Real Estate Facilitator Outreach Outreach Activity Directed to Real Estate Industry in Orange and Los Angeles Counties Completed One Real Estate Industry Outreach Activity Tourism Outreach Materials A. Press Kit B. Tourism Brochure - Reprint Completed Press Kit Tourism Brochure Media Relations B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. Update and Maintain Media Lists Monthly Event Publicity Respond to Media Inquiries Travel Media Outreach Tourist Guidebook Outreach (new for '97) Tourism Industry Newsletter Long-lead Event Calendar Media Familiarization Tours Cable/Public Access Visitors Guide Completed Tourism Industry Newsletter Visitors Guide Travel Industry Outreach A. Industry Mailings B. Trade Show Participation Coml;)leted One Tourism Trade Show Selected Advertising A. Develop Print Ad B. Identify Advertising Venues and Buy Media Completed Advertising in Two Tourism Trade Publications New On Going To Do On Going On Going On Going On Going To Do On Going On Going On Going On Going New On Going On Going New City City City City City City City City City City City City Chamber City City Chamber City Chamber City Chamber City City City r :\syersk~,edc~tret .98 4 V Marketing Workshops A. Small Business Development Workshop On Going Chamber Vl Integrated Marketing Tactics A. Table Tents - Reprint To Do City CornDieted Table Tents City VII Sponsored Items A. Tourism Site on World Wide Web On Going Chamber /EDC VIII Services A. Rack Service - Expand to Orange County On Going City CornDieted Rack Service in San Diego City Although the indicated agency has taken the lead for the tactic, the total outcome of the FY96/97 Marketing Plan is the result of the hard work of the entire Marketing Committee. !=conomic DeveloDment P~rtners The strategic plan sets forth the participation of our partners and their roles in the plan as follows: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - The mission of the Chamber is "to promote the economic environment of all member businesses and by doing so will support the programs which preserve and improve the quality of life." The Chamber primarily supports small businesses and provides walk-in visitor and tourist information. Additionally, the Chamber responds to requests for tourism, relocation and business inquiries and sends corresponding information to prospective visitors, residents and potential businesses. The Chamber encourages existing businesses and residents to ~Shop Temecula First" and provides avenues for businesses to promote their products and services. The Chamber serves as a representative for business legislative issues that affect the overall welfare of the Chamber Membership. In cooperation with the school district, the Chamber plans, coordinates and assists in programs that foster and encourage a viable working partnership among business, educators and students. The fee to the Chamber, was $85,000 in FY97 (including reprints of the visitors guide). The FY98 request is for $112,425. An activity report is included in Attachment D. Temecula Valley Economic DeveloDment CorDoration ¢FDC) - According to their mission statement, the purpose of the EDC is ~to promote growth, development and r:\=yersk\edc~trat .98 5 retention...to improve business conditions and job growth...and to assist existing employers in the area and to encourage their expansion and growth within the area." EDC membership is composed of a broad spectrum of businesses, professionals, non- profit organizations, and public agencies. The FY97 contribution was $61,400 ( excluding matching funds of $10,000). The FY98 request is for $91,000. Their business plan is included as Attachment E. Temecula Valley Film Council {Film Council) - "The mission of the Film Council to market Temecula as a desirable, cooperative, efficient and multi-faceted location destination for the film, television and advertising industry... to further the interests of Temecula Valley economic development by attracting the film industry to our area, to act as a liaison between the film industry and the community, to provide a focal point for all film related inquiries, to prepare and provide a location library, production and service information to the industry, to educate local merchants to the opportunities of servicing the film industry and to promote the relocation of film companies to the area to generate new jobs." The FY97 contribution was $30,000. The current year request of $35,000 is included in their report (Attachment F). Old Town Mainstreet Association ¢OTTMA) - The mission of OTTMA is "to implement the Specific Plan for Old Town Temecula using the four point Mainstreet strategy for downtown revitalization." Organization - To build a strong membership organization to support financially and philosophically the Old Town Mainstreet project. To build partnerships with outside organizations, businesses, media, financial institutions and city government. Design - To work closely with the city planning staff, Redevelopment Agency, Local Review Board, Old Town Task Force as a liaison between those agencies and the business owners and property owners in Old Town. Economic Restructure - To develop a BRAG (Business Recruitment Assistance Group) made up of EDC, City, Chamber of Commerce, OTTMA and appropriate business representatives within the city to determine a desirable retail/service business mix in Old Town and to outline those businesses to be recruited to balance the current mix. Promotion - To build upon existing special events and promotions and add several others specifically focusing on Old Town's target markets. The Old Town Specific Plan calls for a decreasing annual contribution to the organization. The OTTMA is in the process of developing a five year business plan which will be brought back by staff at a later date. r:\syemk\edcstrat.98 6 Inland Fm[)ire Fconomic Partnership (IEEP) - Any local economic development effort must be coordinated with the County and surrounding cites. This was never more evident than in the 1993 negotiations with International Rectifier. Staff is currently working with IEEP and other local cities on a regional marketing effort. Outreach includes direct mailing, trade show participation, and visits to key Chief Executive Officers of major companies in Los Angeles, New York, etc. Additionally, the City was featured in a Los Angeles Times article resulting from our joint marketing program. The City's contribution to the Inland Empire Marketing Program is approximately $12,000. This represents nearly 3 times the prior year funding and is based on like increases in the Marketing Plan and IEEP staffing dedicated to lead generation. Murrieta/Temecula Rroup (MTR) MTG has a broader mission than economic development, however, one of their key objectives is "to support for the economic development efforts of the two cities, county and the local economic development organization." This group was identified in the EDC proposal as the legislative advocate for economic development. MTG has never requested any financial assistance from the City. Southwest County Alliance - The Southwest County Alliance was created to promote the many benefits found for the business and real estate communities within the region. Additionally, the Alliance is working to bring attention to the need for infrastructure improvements, such as a brine line and better access to fiber optics. Temecula Valley Vintners' Association - As an organization, the Vintners Association has the responsibility to work for the improvement of the social, agricultural political and business environments in which we work and live. The Vintner's Association does not exist solely for profit, yet profit is essential to their survival. Profit comes from the quality of their witness and people, their efficiency, pragmatism and productivity. Their purpose is to pursue the perfection of an age-old art form inextricably linked to the earth while preserving an agricultural area and lifestyle in the Temecula Valley. Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival - The mission of the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival is ~to produce a premier event with unique, quality family entertainment that attracts guests from Southern California; directly contributing to the economic development of the environmentally-conscious master planned community; thereby, providing proceeds to charitable organizations." The annual City sponsorship is $10,600. The key to the success of the Economic Development Strategic Plan is the leverage we obtain when joining in public/private partnerships. r:\ayemk~ed(~tret.98 7 Funding Consider~,fions The Redevelopment Agency has historically provided financial support for the Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Corporation, the Film Council and the Old Town Mainstreet Association. The Fiscal Year 1998 funding requests from these organizations are included as Attachment D - Chamber of Commerce, Attachment E - EDC, Attachment F - Film Council. The Old Town Mainstreet Association (OTTMA) is in the process of developing a long range plan which will be brought to you at a later date. The Agency may purchase all or a portion of the services of the EDC, Chamber and Film Council. Concid,sion: The Economic Development Strategic Plan is a comprehensive approach to promoting the City of Temecula. It is based on policy set by the City Council focusing on quality of life, attracting quality business and promoting tourism. The marketing component presented here is a conservative, directed approach to promote business and tourism and it capitalizes on the strengths of our community's human resources through our partnerships with various non-profit organizations. FISCAL IMPACT: Based on Agency action for items 2 & 3, an FY97-98 budget appropriation may be necessary. Attachments: A- B- C- D- E- F- Economic Development Element Employment Report Marketing Plan FY1997-98 Chamber of Commerce FY98 Funding Request Economic Development Corporation FY98 Funding Request Film Council FY98 Funding Request r:~yer~k\edc~trat.98 8 CITY OF TElVIECULA GENERAL PLAN ECONOMIC DEV!=-T.OPMENT ATTACHMENT A CITY OF TEMECIJ~ Economic Development Element !. INTRODUCTION A. Overview of the Economic Development Element The purpose of this Element is to provide guidance for economic development within Temecula's jurisdiction to attain an economically viable community. In this scnse, economically viable means a providing range of housing and employment o?portuniues that meet the needs of residents and workers alike, attracting families and businesses to create demand for pla~r~ed land uses, and establishing and funding public service levels that preserve Temecula's quality of life. The Economic Development Element is linked primarily to the Land Use and Housing Elements. Land use policy, in which the City takes an active role in defining development intensity, balance and mix of land uses and design guidelines, is fundamental to economic growth and fiscal well-being. Land use policy also helps the City plan in advance for the secondary effects of development, including employment grow.h, infrastructure requirements and :fiscal impacts. Temecula's housing policy is also linked to economic development planning in that economic relationships exist between housing types and employment opportunities, as well as between housing densities and the cost to maintain City service levels. With regard to attracting industry and maintaining mobility for corporate activities, the Circulation Element is also important to the economic development strategy. B. Authorization and Scope The Economic Development Element is an optional element of the General Plan, as set forth in the State Planning, Zoning .and Development Laws, California Government Code §65303. Although the Economic Development Element is not a required element in the General Plan, the City has requested that one be prepared to consolidate and codify a gro .wT;ng body of policy concerning the economic and fiscal viability of Temecula. Since this element is optional, it may be amended by the City Council to adapt to changing needs and economic conditions. C. Related Plans and Programs I. Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation The Temecuta-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation (EDC) is a privately funded program chartered to promote economic growth and development within Southwestern Riverside County. The EDC aims to accomplish its mission by improving business conditions and job growth in order to attract medium to large clean industry employers and to assist existing employers in the area. The EDC's goals for the subregion complement Temecula's specific economic development goals. Additionally, the EDC provides technical assistance with economic research and marketing programs that directly benefit the City. Date: November 9, 1993 Page 11-1 ~ OF 'I'E3~~ Economic Development Element 2. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce is currently providing four programs related to business development in the Temecula area: Tourism. The Chamber is currently in the pmc~&q of pumuing a program for elementary school children from other counties to visit Temecula's historical disu'ict, wineries, home ranches and museum as a field trip. The purpose is to educate kids and give them information to take home m their parents, opening the possibilities of relocating homes or businesses to the area. Local business promotions. The "Shop Temecula First" program is a year-round project encouraging citizens to shop locally. The program is designed to educate consumers that the monies from local sales mx are used for local expenditures. Local merchants participate in the program by displaying logos and posters for ad campaigns. Education. The Chamber offers a busine.~ start-up kit to new and relocating businesses. The kits contain City guidelines for operating a business, tax information, City ordinances such as signage, and area information. Governmental. The Chamber has an active Civic and Developmental committee which tracks business related legislation and local issue& The Committee members attend the Planning Commission, Traffic Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council meetings and make recommendations to the board for talcing positions on business related issues. 3. City of Temecula Pubh'city Campaign Tcmecula has recently launched a national publicity campaign 'to promote the advantages of locating in Tcmecula. The program included development of a promotional video and target industry list. This program currently implements several goals stated in this element, and should be further reviewed to ensure continuing efforts are in accordance with this clement. Old Town Specific Plan The Temecula Old Town Specific Plan is being prepared concurrently with the C~neral Plan. The Old Town area provides an important retail environment within a historic setting, making it a key component of Temecula's tourism industry. Because of its importance to the local economy, the Old Town Specific Plan should be implemented in accordance with Temecula's stated economic development goals. TEM-01UlGP-£~-D~ * Dam: November 9, 1~ Page 11-2 CITY OF TEM~C-'ULA Economic Development Element II. SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES There is an interdependence among economic issues and the overall quality of ldc in Tcmecula. The high standards for community facilities and sewices attract businesses and residents. This am'action generates revenues which make high standards possible. Given its demonstrated attractiveness to industry and residents alike, opportunity exists for Temccula to t-urther strengthen the local economy and maintain high servic~ levels through effective economic development planning. A. Balanced Land Use As Temecula grows, there will be a need to maintain a level of housing supply which is affordable to workers in Temceula, given the diversiffed nature o£ the arca's employment base. This is important for two primary reasons. First, an improved jobs/housing balance will reduce long-distance commuting and enhance the quality of life £or all Temecuta residents. Second, a jobs/housing balance will increase the range of choice for residents and businesses, making Temccula attractive to prospective residents and employers. B. Fiscal Viability Given the economic realities in California, each local jurisdiction must maintain its own fiscal viability. This will require a combination of land use policy, attraction of business, and local revenue policy, including taxation. It must be also recognized that long-term fiscal viability requires in~emental public and private investment, including development impact fees. C. Economic Expansion.- The economy in Tcmecula has expanded very rapidly over the 1983 to 1989 period. However, there has b~n concern in the community that growth since 1989 may be flagging. As Temecuta's economic base once again expands, this expansion can provide a ~'cater range of job opportunities and can help the City meet its fiscal goals. However, rapid expar~nion can also lead to undesirable impacts on traffic and other in.f:rastructure capacity. D. Employment Growth Temecula's job base grew very rapidly during the 1980s. The number of jobs in Temccula increased f:rom about 4,000 in 1983 to over 15,000 by 1992. This growth represents an ~nnual growth rate of about 18 percent, significantly higher than growth in both the Riverside-San Bernardino Metropolitan Area and Southwest Riverside County. Based on economic trends and projections for the Southern California region, the number of jobs in the Temecula area is projected to increase by between 30,000 and 53,000 by 2010. TI~vI-OlUlOP.£CDEV * Date: Novcm~r 9, 1~ Page 11-3 CITY OF THM~CUL,A Economic Development Element E. Development Capacity During the 1980s, the area that is now T:mecula experienced rapid growth, tr.n-~itioning from a rmidcntial-oficnted suburban community into an employmorn c~nter for southwmmrn ILivcmidc County. Even under curmot rec~sionary conditions, si?ificam development potential still r~mains for additional employment and residential development within the City and sphere of influence, with over 3,330 acres proposed for employment and about 1,275 acrm/or retail development. As ~c. onomi¢ recovery occum, Temccula will once again cxpcr/cnc~ the pressures of development. Within this context, City officials and community mcmbcr~ have ~cognizexl the n -r.~:t to develop an economic s~ratcgy to guide future economic growth. F. Industry. Growth Tcm~ula's maaufacturiag b~e has shown strong growth in the high t~haology industries and moderate growth in other industrim. Tcmecula scrvm as a regional retailing center, with about $2.00 in retail sales for every $1.00 of demand within the City Iimits. Tcmecula has also grown rapidly in the scrviees sector, particularly in business and professional services. G. Tourism Community leaders have expressed a dinire to see tourism expanded beyond the realm of Old Town and the wineries into a commercial recreation industry which will generate positive economic impacts for Temecula. Preliminary economic analysis of the Temecula area indicates tha~ additional diversification is currently needed in lodging, amusement and recreation service,~. T~-01UIGP-£C.D~V * Dam: Novcml:~r 9, 1993 Pag~ 11-a Economic Development Elemcnr I!!.GOALS AND POLICIES Goal 1 Development of a swong base of clean manufacrttring activities which employs a siallied labor force and can be successfully integrated into Temecula's community character. Discussion Tcmecula has maintained high standards for manufacturing activity which have enhanced its attractiveness to both employers and residents. With additional land reserved for manufacturing activities, the City must continue to guide the location, design, and function of industry throughout its development cycle. Policy 1.1 Attract and retain industry that complements Temecula's character and takes advantage of Temecula's 1oeational advantage for goods movement and corporate mobility. Policy 13 Encourage the growth and expansion of existing industry by providing high quality municipal services, facilities, and economic development assistance. Policy 1-3 Maintain a local regulatory environment that is favorable to clean industry.. Policy 1.4 Provide technical assistance to industries that will bc a:ffcctcd by new regional air quality regulations and other developing regional regnlatiom. Goal 2 Diversification of the economic base to include a range of manufacturing, retail and service activities. Discussion The economy in Temecula has b~n expanding very rapidly, providing job opportunities and generating riscally positive development patterns. The Temecula economy has shown rec~nt divemification in both manufacturing and services. Since Temecula has not yet completed its real estate development cycle, the economic base can be expected to diversify further, with an increased level of professional services and a more mature retail base. Areas where additional diversification is needed may include: the financial sector, medical and health services, retail (particularly in general merchandise and apparel), lodging, recreation and other visitor-oriented services. Pohcy 2.1 Provide for industrial land uses which facilitate a variety of user types, including manufacturing space, storage and distribution, back-of:rice space, and research and development space. Policy Plan for land use and development patterns that allow succession of use and will adapt to Temecula's economic conditions. TEM-01LIIOP-£C. DEV · Dam: November 9, 1993 Page 11-$ CITY OF TEMEC-'ULA Economic Development Element Policy 2.3 Policy 2.4 Policy 2.5 Promote development of properly 1o~atccl and well designeel commcrcia~ centers to meet the diverse service needs of the City. Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high-quality goads and scrvicc~ for residents, workers and tourists, including apparel, general merchandise, home fia'nishings and appliances. Use redevelopment powcm and opportunities to enhance development opportunities. Goal 3 Discussion Policy Maintain an economic base to provide a sound fiscal foundation for the City' as well as quality commnnity facilities and high service levels. Prior to incorporation, the Tcmccula area cxpericneexi rapid growth under the jurisdiction of Rivcmidc County. With incorporation and the ability to capture more local revenues, the City is now able to conduct fiscal planning in the context of economic development. With economic development planning, Temccula has an even greater oppormuity to influence its fiscal base, resulting in a fiscal balance across land uses. 3.I Policy 3.2 Policy 3.3 Policy 3.4 Encourage a pattern of development that balances revenue generating land uses in phase with other uses that have negative fiscal impacts. Encourage the growth or rclocation of industries that generate local tax and employment advantages. Evaluate fiscal' impacts of new development on an ongoing basis and provide appropriate mitigation strategies. Take advantage of Tcmccula's regional capture of taxable sales and continue to establish Tcmccula as a retailing center along the Interstate 15 corridor. TEM-OIUlOP.F.g. DEV · Dam: Novcrabs. 9, 19t73 Page 11-~ CITY OF TEM~CUL, A Economic Development Elernent Goal 4 Discussion Policy Establishment of a diverse education and traitting and job placement system which will develop and maintain a high quality work force in Temecula. Residents and cmploycr~ have identified education as a key element in developing the long-range economic base in Temeeula. By pwviding superior educational opportunities and resources, with an emphasis on practical educational programs £or the job mix required to serve the community, many residents will prei:r to work: within the City. A ~11 range of adult education, retraining, special education, vocational/technical education and collcg¢/univemity level facilities and curriculums should be provided, aimed at responding to the educational n'--,m~:is of the community through each phase oi development. 4.1 Policy 4.2 Pohcy 4.3 Support economic development goals through a range of ~ucation and training activities. Establish a proactive, periodic dialogue early in the platming proc:.ss between the City and educational institutions, including school distric~ and community colleges, on issues related to the phasing of development, service standards and demands. Explore the potential for a comprehensive cxmnsion center titrough UC Riverside and/or the California State Unive~ity system. Goal 5 Discussion Pohcy Promote the advantages to businesses of locating in Temecula, including cost advantages, amenities, housing, community activities and civic services. Temecula currently has a number of favorable employment growth conditions - including demonstrated attractiveness to industry and an ideal locatiohal advantages for company headquartem. The City wishes to focus future efforts on continuing to attract high quality clean industry. However, with the current regulatory environment and rising land price.s, the City may need to clearly define incentives for businesses to locate in Temecula instead of other communities. 5.1 Pohcy 5.2 Policy 5.3 Policy 5.4 Develop and maintain a marketing program to publicize the virtues of relocating to Temecula. Monitor the economic conditions in Temecula in comparison to other locations in California and throughout the nation to determine relative advantages. Monitor the supply of housing in relation to the supply of jobs in terms of to balance area-wide jobs, households, worker earnings and housing expenses. Monitor existing businesses in Temecula and identify the elements of a business retention program. 'r~.~4~m2m,.~c.~, · Date: November 9, 19~Y3 Page 11-7 C'[TY OF TEIVIE~ Economic Development Element Goal 6 Discussion Policy Develop Temecula as a comprehensive., recognizable tourist destination, with a range of at'tractions throughout and beyond the sphere of influence. Because of its wine country location and historical si~m'~ifieane~, Temecula has become a limited tourist destination point. For tourism to play an effw. tive role in the local economy, however, the industry must expand beyond Old Town and seasonal attractions and provide for year-round activities capable of generating greater tourist interest. Community leade~ have expressed the de.sir~ to expand Temeeuta'$ tourism industry in a manner that complements established residential areas as well as businesses. 6.1 Policy 6.2 Policy 6.3 Policy 6.4 Encourage and enhan~ cooperative eft. am with the wine-making industry in the Tcmccula Valley to promon: Tcmeeula as a destination resort. Identify commercial recreation, convention and resort activities - including goLf-oriented resorra - that can take advantage of Tcmecula's character and climate, while complementing wine-making activitiea. Revitalize and enhance Old Town to expand its role in local taurism and to improve its attractiveness, accessibility, and economic vitality. Enhance the City's image through development of cultural facilities, including performing am, museums. Date: November 9, 1993 Page 11-8 CITY OF TEMECULA EMPLO~ REPOKT ATTAC~B Employment CITY OF TEMECULA SECTION 4 EMPLOYMENT Temecula's emergence as a center of job growth is primarily the result of the migration of firms and people to the Inland Empire from the Southland's coastal counties. This migration is occur- ring as the density of land development in Orange, Los Angeles and San Diego Counties has cre- ated a shortage of manufacturing, distribution and housing space, and increased space costs. In most cases, this phenomena is increasing the demand for business space and homes along transportation corridors in cities directly adjacent to Orange and Los Angeles Counties.. Teme- cula is unique in two ways. It has been able to get firms and families to leap frog past many miles of undeveloped land to locate within its borders. And, the jobs coming to the city are better paying than the Inland Empire average. Why? Since the city's inception, local leaders have undertaken a consistent and successful pro- gram to lure high technology firms to the area. These efforts have been aided by the city's physi- cal beauty and moderate climate. Meanwhile, the completion of the 1-15 freeway has given commuters and firms located in Temecula ready access to San Diego and Orange County mar- kets, while allowing them to avoid the land restrictions and high costs of those areas. Employment Between the first six months of 1991 and 1996, CA Employment Development Department show that Temecula's employment rose from 13,590 to 19,714 (Exhibit 43), up 6,124 jobs or an very rapid 45.1%. The city's economy has begun to specialize with 5,455 of its total jobs in manu- facturing (Exhibit 44). Consistent with the city's development policies, Manufacturing (2,246) and Distribution & Transportation (643)accounted for 47.2% of new jobs (Exhibit 45). From 1991-1996, Temecula's annual job growth rates have far exceeded the 0.6% to 3.7% rates for the Inland Empire (Exhibit 46) except in 1995. This growth trend has altered the make up of the city's economy with manufacturing moving from 23.6% of employment in 1991 to 27.7% in 1996 (Exhibit 47-8). ('ily of Trmrcula k~, l'~rpan. d by Jolm E. Ilusino~, 1'1-1). l'a~e 24 Employment Pavroll The payroll expended by firms located in Temecula has followed a pattern similar to employ- ment, though its growth has been more aggressive. In 1991, city payrolls totaled $153 million. In 1996 they reached $248 million, up $95 million or 62.1% (Exhibit 49). When adjustment is made for the 11.7% increase in the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Consumer Price Index, the purchasing power of this payroll was up 50.3% (Exhibit 50). From 1991-1996, payroll growth in Temecula was dominated by Manufacturing ($48 million) which alone accounted for 50.5% of the city increase (Exhibit 52). Construction, and Engineering & Management suffered declines. In 1996, the Manufacturing sector had the largest payroll ($95 million), followed by Retail Trade ($35 million) and Government, Education & Utilities ($26 million) (Exhibit 51). Averace Pay Per Worker Pay per worker in Temecula rose from $22,480 in 1991 to $25,115 in 1996, an 11.7% increase. However, this was exactly offset by the 11.7% increase in prices, leaving the average worker with almost exactly the same standard of living (Exhibit 53-53). The entire growth in the pur- chasing power of Temecula's payroll was thus from the increased number of workers in the city. Within the sectors, Temecula is unusual in having Manufacturing and Distribution & Transporta- tion as its highest, and third highest paying sectors. Along with Engineering & Management and Finance, Insurance & Real Estate these sectors averaged over $30,000 (Exhibits 55-56). The lowest paying sectors, averaging below $20,000, were those involving consumer services, agri- culture and employment agencies. Number & Size Of Firms The number of firms in Temecula grew slowly from 1991-1994, rising from 1,189 to 1,255. In 1995 and 1996 the number increased rapidly to 1,533 as Califomia's recession began to end (Exhibit 57). The 133 new firms in Distribution & Transportation (53), Business Service (41) and Manufacturing (39) firms were roughly matched by the 115 new firms in Consumer Service (59) and Retail Trade (56) (Exhibit 58-60). The gains in the latter were in rough conformance to economic theory that states that when new basic tier firms bring money to a community, a sec- ondary tier of firms will be created as that new money is spent locally on consumer goods and services. Temecula's economy is dominated by small firms, with the average number of employees fluctu- ating from a low of 11.4 employees in 1991, to a high of 14.2 in 1994 (Exhibit 61). In 1996, the only exception to the small size rule was in the Government, Education & Utility sector (103). Otherwise, only the Manufacturing (42), Hotel & Amusement (21) and Retail Trade (16) sectors exceeded the city average (Exhibit 62). Accuracy Check Comparing data for the full years 1991-1995, to those for the six months 1991-1995, reveals no essential differences in the behavior of employment, payroll or firm information. The use of first six months data, to allow the inclusion of 1996 information, thus seems warranted. ~ 'it?.' of Temecula P~epa~ed ~' John F2 llusing, Pitl). Page 25 ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVe...L. CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECU~ AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director June 10, 1997 Award a Professional Se~ices Agreement to Urban Design Studio to prepare the Southside Specific Plan Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Award a Professional Services Agreement in the Amount of $61,700.00 to Urban Design Studio to prepare the Southside Specific Plan and authorize the City Manager to sign Agreement. BACKGROUND The General Plan designates the area west of 1-15 to the City Limits between Rancho California Road and Route 79S as Specific Plan. This area includes two previously approved specific plans, the Old Town Specific Plan and the Westside Specific Plan. The Southside Specific Plan covers the majority of the remainder of the area not included in those specific plans,(refer to Attachment 1 for the project boundary map). On August 22, 1995, the City Council directed staff to prepare the Southside Specific Plan. The City received five proposals to prepare this specific plan (refer to Attachment 2 for a list of consultants). The Selection Committee interviewed all five consultants and recommended Urban Design Studio (refer to Attachment 3 for a list of Selection Committee members). The major focus of this specific plan is to improve the aesthetics of the area in terms of architecture and landscaping. In addition, a Land Use Plan will be prepared to address the land use issues in the area. The main focus of this Land Use Plan is to encourage uses that do not directly compete with uses in Old Town and provide a transition of uses into Old Town. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of this project is $61,700. The Community Development Department has already included $70,000 in the FY 96-97 budget, Account Number 001 161 999 5248. Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. Project Boundary Map - Page 2 Consultant List - Page 3 Selection Committee Members - Page 5 Agreement between City of Temecula and Urban Design Studio - Page 7 R:\$OUTHSP%CONTRT.CC 614197 ~a 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PROJECT BOUNDARY MAP R:\SOUTHSP~CONTRT.CC 6/3/9'7 m 2 PROJECT BOUNDARY ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONSULTANT LIST R:~SOUTHS~CONTRT.CC 6/31F7 m 3 Urban Design Studio PBR Envicom RNM Keith International R:\~OUTI-~P~CONTRT.CC 6/3/F7 =a 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 SELECTION COMMITTEE MEMBERS R:\SOUTHSP~CONTRT.CC 6/3/~'/sn 5 Steve Ford, Council Member Linda Fahey, Chair Person of the Planning Commission Ron Parks, Principal Engineer Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst R:\SOU'I'HSP~CONTRT.CC 6/4/97 sn 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND URBAN DESIGN STUDIO TO PREPARE THE SOUTHSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN R: \SOIYTH$I~CONTR?.CC 614/97 ~a 7 PROFES,qIONAI. ,qF. RVICF. q This Agreement was made and entered into this 10th day of June 1997, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Urban Design Studio hereinafter called ("Consultant"). The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: 1. Services. Consultant shall perform the ta_uks set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. 2. Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. 3. Payment. The City agrees to compensate the Consultant for its services based upon the costs set forth in Exhibit B. The total cost of this contract shall not exceed $61,700, which represents the total compensation to be paid to Consultant by City for all work to be done by the Consultant. The total cost for this contract shall include the costs of duplication for all reports and documents described in Exhibit A. The City Manager may approve additional payments, not to exceed $10,000.00 for additional or supplemental work. Such costs for work under this contract shall be reimbursed only if the work is approved by the City as to its nature, type, amount, and staff performing the services. The City shall withhold ten percent (10%) of the cost of this contract until all work on this project, as specified in Exhibit A, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City. Consultant shall submit invoices upon the completion of the work activities contained in Exhibit A, except that such invoices shall never be submitted more than once in any thirty (30) day period. Such invoices shall specify the completed work task(s) included on the invoice, the total amount invoiced to date, and the total amount outstanding. Within thirty (30) days of submittal of any invoice, the City shall either approve said invoice or return it to Consultant specifying any objections. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of the approval of the invoice. 4. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant. 5. Ownership Of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. The Consultant may, at its option and expense, elect to have the work products for this project copyrighted jointly with the City of Temecula. R:\FORMS\CONTRACT.SVC 5/30/9'7 klb 6. City Responsibility. The City shall make all reasonable efforts to cooperate with Consultant in the completion of this project, including but not limited to: a. Designating a single representing authority with whom Consultant can fulffil Consultant needs. b. Prompfiy notifying Consultant of any dissatisfaction with Consultants performance or any deviation from the tasks specified in Exhibit A. c. Providing City documents and reports to Consultant at no cost. 7. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least ten (10) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. 8. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultants acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 9. Consultant Staff. The Consultant Principal in Charge, Mark J. Brodeur, shall be responsible for the professional services required to complete the activities identified in Exhibit A. Modifications to Consultant's staffing, including subconsultants for this project, shall be made only with the prior written approval of the City. 10. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder. 11. Term. This Agreement shall commence on June 11, 1997, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 1998. 12. Subcontracts. The Consultant shall not enter into any subcontracts for services to be rendered toward the completion of the Consultant's portion of this Agreement without the consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be for the value of service rendered to the City. 13. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant R:~'OR~$\CONTRACT.$VC 5/'30/97 k~ to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, tt_a~. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. 14. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: a. City: Attention: City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 b. Consultant: Mark J. Brodeur, Principal 14725 Alton Parkway Irvine, CA 92619 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. 15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. 16. Sickness or I~ury of Consultant. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Consultant shall secure worker's compensation insurance. Upon request of Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's worker's compensation policy and the Consultant to the City's worker's compensation policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. R:',FORMS\CONTP..ACT.SVC 5130/97 k~ CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By: Ron Bradley, City Manager ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney R:\FORMS\CONTRACT.SVC 5/30/g7 klb Exl-imrr A TAgKS TO RE PERFORMED R:~FORMS\CONTRACT.SVC 5/30/~'/ 10b 2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED) 2. SCOPE OF WORK Task 1.2 - Research of Existing Documents TASK 1.0 - INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHSIDE AREA The foundation for the Specific Plan planning effort will be constructed during the inventory. and analysis phase. It will provide the data and analysis necessary to understand the ways in which physical, social, environmental, community facilities, and public policy issues provide a range of choices for the study area. Specific tasks will include: Task 1.1 Define Project Objectives, Concerns, and Requirements The draft components of Temecula's General Plan, Old Town Specific Plan zoning ordinance, Citywide Design Guidelines, streetscape plans. and other existing plans, policies, and ordinances will be reviewed. The purpose of this review is to identify the public policy parameters within which the Southside Specific Plan will be prepared. Opportunities, constraints, and on-site development/ redevelopment which might result from the policies and conclusions of the documents being reviewed will be identified. Potential measures to capitalize on opportunities and minimize constraints will be identified. At the outset of the program, Urban Design Studio's project manager will meet with City staff to establish a mutual understanding of the key issues to be addressed, refine the scope of work and project timing, and obtain additional plans, reports, ordinances, and studies applicable to the project. Another objective of this meeting will be to reevaluate the appropriateness of the proposed project boundaries and to either expand or contract them accordingly. The most important purpose of this meeting will be to clearly define City expectations for the planning/design program, and to define basic objectives regarding study area development. PRODUCT: TIME FRAME: Findings notes 2 days PRODUCT: Discussion notes TIME FRAME: 1 day Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 Ci~ of Temecula 2 Sco , (l v sg ) Task 1.3 - Field Reconnaissance A field reconnaissance of the project area will be conducted. It is recommended that Urban Design Studio schedule with Saied Naaseh, project manager, a mutually agreed upon time to conduct the field trip together and concurrently with Task 1.1. Valuable input can be gained from planners originally involved with the project. PRODUCT: Videotape log, slides TIME FRAME: 1 day Task 1.4 - Base Mapping/Exhibits Urban Design Studio will be responsible for securing any available aerial and topographic maps from the City. The City will make available any existing base maps for the plan area. The consultants will prepare a composite base map from the City provided maps which depict necessary information. If additional information is necessary. and required by the City, but unavailable from the City, the consultant team will provide such information on a reimbursable basis. The exact boundaries of the Specific Plan area must be defined at this point to avoid contract amendments. PRODUCT: Full size and reduced base maps (vellum original) TIME FRAME: 2 weeks Task 1.5 Baseline Infrastructure Facilities, and Services Analysis (deleted) Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 Ci.ty of Ternecula 2 2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED) Task 1.6 - Market Analysis (deleted) Task 1.7 - Opportunities and Constraints Analysis Urban Design Studio will identify and assess opportunities and constraints including inconsistent building design, and other development standards. Land use buffer and ~xansition areas will be mapped, along with other information found in the field which could impact a final planning/design solution. PRODUCT: Opportunities and Constraints Map - colored TIME FRAME: 2 weeks Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 City of Temecula 3 2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED) TASK 2.0 - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND STAFF INPUT Urban Design Studio knows and has worked in Temecula where individual property, rights are of paramount importance. We urge the City to select a full-service urban design firm with proven experience working with citizen advisory committees. While we understand the City will work with the successful firm in determining the type and level of public input to be provided, Urban Design Studio suggests the following (first class) methods that have proven successful in other similar downtowns. The public participation methods that we have recommended are comprehensive in their scope. The City requested a "first class" comprehensive Specific Plan and we are proposing a fun and informative public participation process as part of our overall approach. feedback. As currently structured, we are planning to conduct three workshops with the SC. SC Workshop #1 - Kickoff, get acquainted. issues. "Best of" tour. "What is a Specific Plan?" SC Workshop #2 - Land use/visioning charette SC Workshop #3 - Design Guidelines, Regulations, Public Improvements PRODUCTS: 3 meetings, Slide Presentations, Questionnaire, Memorandums TIME FRAME: Generally first 2-4 months of process Task 2.1 Workshops with Southside Committee Eariv in the Specific Plan process, the project team will meet with the "Southside Committee" to provide orientation to the process and to receive input regarding issues and goals for the area that will be used to develop the draft plan. Staff will be responsible for assembling the Committee, arranging the workshop and providing an introductory overview of the project. Urban Design Studio will facilitate group Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 Ci~ of Temecula 4 $¢ov Task 2.2 - Saturday Storefront Workshop (Public Workshop #4) As a method of soliciting further community input, Urban Design Studio proposes to hold a one-day "drop-in" workshop in a location in the Southside area. This will provide an opportunity for merchants and community members to participate in the Specific Plan process in an informal way, and "on their own terms". Consultants and staff will be on hand to discuss the Specific Plan process and exchange ideas. Appropriate maps and graphics will be available. PRODUCT: Full- or half-day meeting, input notes, map graphics (colored) PRODUCT: TIME FRAME: 2- to 3-hour meeting, meeting notes 8 hours. including preparation time. Task 2.4- Personal Interviews (Local merchants/property owners) Urban Design Studio will conduct approximately 15 personal interviews with preselected (by City) owners, merchants, and elected officials. These interviews would be used to solicit the owner/merchant or elected official's desires in terms of land use and physical improvements for the area. PRODUCT: Interview Notes TIME FRAME: 2 days TIME FRAME: 1 day Task 2.3 - Joint Workshop with City Council and Planning Commission I'Public Workshop #5) Shortly before or after the Saturday Storefront Workshop, Urban Design Studio will hold a joint workshop meeting with the City Council and Planning Commission. The purpose of the workshop will be to identify broad issues relative to the plan and receive direction on plan development. The consultant team will be prepared at this time to discuss findings and action programs and will solicit feedback from those present. Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 City of Temecula 5 2 SCORE OF WORK (REviSED) Task 2.5 - Public Hearings Urban Design Studio will attend one Planning Commission hearing and one City Council hearing to consider and adopt the Specific Plan. Extra meetings will be attended on a $750 per meeting basis. PRODUCT: n/a TIME FRAME: 2 days Task 2.6 - Staff Liaison/ Project Management Urban Design Studio team members will maintain continuous contacts with City staff and participate in regular meetings or conference calls to monitor progress. receive input. and feedback. These meetings will also be used as project management tools to keep staff and the consultant team informed. We currently anticipate a minimum of five meetings in Temecula with City staff. It is envisioned that these meetings will be held on Workshop days to the extent possible. PRODUCT: N/A TIME FRAME: Ongoing during contract Regular meetings with staff will be scheduled. In addition, tt is anticipated that informal, informational meetings with the Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Association. specific properOy owners. Board of Realtors', or other interested grou£s could be scheduled in conjunction with the Project Team ~' visits to the area. They are included at no additional charge. Southside Specific Plan Revised- l Ci.ty of Temecula SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED) TASK 3.0 -EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT (deleted) TRAFFIC Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 City of Temecula 7 2 S¢or ov TASK 4.0 - FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT The consultant team will prepare draft policy and master plan scenarios together for the Southside Specific Plan area. All consultants will assist in the development of review of master plan patterns for their respective considerations (e.g. Circulation. Marketing, Infrastructure, Urban Design, Open Space, etc.) Task 4.1 - Goals and Policies The preparation of goals and policies is the key to success for the Specific Plan program. While the identification of existing conditions and evaluation of issues and opportunities does much to assist in understanding the study area, it is the goals and policies which clarify the logic of the Specific Plan. The goals and policies provide direction, represent the criteria for selecting alternatives, and solidi~ the management plan for the study area's future. As part of the review of project alternatives. a Preliminary Statement of Goals and Policies will be submitted to the City, for review. Refined goals and policies will be developed as a final product of this task. PRODUCTS: Preliminary Goals and Policies, Final Goals and Policies TIME FRAME: 2 weeks Task 4.2 - Develop Alternative Land Use Plans Working with staff and the Southside Committee, Urban Design Studio will develop tlxree realistic land use alternatives for the area. This exercise will be the focus of the second Southside Committee Workshop. Task 4.3 - Southside Master Plan (Vision Urban Design Studio will prepare a final master plan following staff, Southside Committee, public, and elected official input. We plan to illustrate and color a wall size exhibit (48"x 48") showing buildings, feature notes, streets, parking, streetscape, etc. A feature of this product will be conceptual site plans for "key vacant or under utilized sites". PRODUCT: Color. preferred Master Plan/Land Use Plan Illustrative TIME FRAME: 3 weeks Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 City of Temecula 8 2 ScoP~ og WoP, K (R~vts~o) 4.3 - Proposed Infrastructure Improvements Planning Report (deleted) Southside Specific' Plan Revised- City of Temecula 9 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED) TASK 5.0 DRAI~ SPECIFIC PLAN COMPONENTS This phase will develop the regulatory and urban design heart of the Specific Plan: land use regulations, permitted uses, development standards, design guidelines, streetscape, and public improvements. The components will be put together to establish the Administrative Draft/Specific Plan. Task 5.1 - Land Use and Development Regulations Detailed !and use and development regulations will be formulated for each subarea Of the Specific Plan area. The regulations will be formulated in conjunction with staff input and findings of other project team members in order to assure compatibility with the overall vision for the Southside area. The development regulations section will constitute zoning for the planning area and will include the following elements: A. General Provisions Description and purpose of Land Use Districts Relation'hip to the City General Plan Interpretation/Effective Date Applicability of Standards Amendments to Plan Land Use Determinations Approval Process Nonconforming Uses Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 City of Temecula B. Specific Development Regulations Primary Function/Location Principal Permitted. and Conditionally Permitted Prohibited Uses Parcel size, Configuration Setbacks (front, side, streetside. rear) Landscape Requirements (percent of parcel coverage, planting densiF, parking area landscape requirements, streetscape percentages) Height Limitations Maximum Site Coverage (building envelope) Paricing Requirements C. Special Provisions/Regulations (if applicable) .4daptive Reuse Parking Waiver Special Sign Overlay Zone Pedestrian Amenity Bonus Program Nonconforming Sign Removal Incentive PRODUCT: Draft Land Use Regulations TIME FRAME: 4 weeks Task 5.2 - Design Guidelines Tailored design guidelines aimed at improving the physical and economic image of the Southside area will be prepared. We propose to present the design guidelines in the form of text and illustrations with notations indicating what the desirable design elements are and how they are to be applied. We will focus on the following 10 2 Sco , og WOrK design components: · :o Site planning 4° Architecture 4° Circulation · :. Signage · :o Landscape/hardscape Draft Design Guidelines The design guidelines will incorporate a combination of design principles, design guidelines, and design standards. The component structure of the guidelines will be as follows: Site Planning · :. setbacks 4. buildingplacement/orientation · :o land use buffenng · :. service areas · :. "special"projects - automotive uses, outdoor dining Architecture do ~ and don'ts architectural context (how to relate or not relate to Old Town) acceptable material palettes (theme) prohibited material palettes roofdesign/parapet walls color wall articulation contextual scale, bulk. and height mechanical equipment storefront/facade design Circulation vehicular circulation standards inter/intra site circulation space size and design requirements parking lot buffers and setbacks driveway throat design standards handicapped provisions Advertising Guidelines sign types/materials/lighting letter size to sign panel percentage color location of signs freestanding signs wall or building signs projecting signs window signs Landscaping acceptable plant palette planter width minimum plant sizes existing landscape retention (trees) exterior lighting fencing/screening Final Draft Design Guidelines Following staff and public review of the draft Design Guidelines, Saied Naaseh will forward a "red ink" modified copy of the guidelines to Urban Design Studio. PRODUCT: Draft Design Guidelines TIME FRAME: 4 weeks Southside Specific Plan Revised- I City of Temecula 11 2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED) Task 5.3 Final Draft Development Regulations and Design Guidelines Following receipt of the City's "red ink" version of the draft, Urban Design Studio will make appropriate revisions and prepare a final draft document for inclusion into the Specific Plan document. PRODUCTS: Final Development Regulations. Final Design Guidelines TIME FRAME: 3 weeks Task 5.4 - Streetscape Improvements The primary. focus of this task will be to prepare a Streetscape Improvement Plan that is consistent with other design recommendations being made in the design guidelines and other sections of the Specific Plan. Relevant input from City staff. the Downtown Committee, and the joint workshop with the Council and Planning Commission will be taken into consideration. A. Right-of-Way Alternatives Urban Design Studio and RBF will review right-of-way alternatives with input from out consultant team and City staff. These alternatives may include medians, safe crosses. diagonal parking, alley usage, and street cul-de-sac/closures. B. Streetscape Plans Urban Design Studio will prepare streetscape plans which implement the goals and objectives of Downtown. The streetscapes will be stylistically suited to the historic theme. Components may include: sidewalk design new trees crosswalks/paving/painting benches pedestrian lights trash receptacles planter boxes retention or undergrounding utilities C. Public Wayfinding System Urban Design Studio will prepare a public signage program stylistically suited to the historic theme and the streetscape elements selected. Sign components will include: freeway. identification (?) directional signage ent.rv signs PRODUCT: Right-of-way alternatives, streetscape components, public signage program TIME FRAME: 4 weeks Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 Citv of Ternecula 12 2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED) Task 5.5 - Economic Implementation Strategies (deleted) Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 City of Temecula 13 2 S¢oP WOR (I v s o) TASK 6.0 - FINAL SPECIFIC PLAN Task 6.1 - Administrative and Public Hearing Drafts Once component task products and graphics have been integrated, the remaining text. including the introduction. goals, and implementation will be prepared (Administrative Draft) and submitted to staff for their "screencheck" review. (5 copies) Following a review and incorporation of staff and Southside Committee comments on the Administrative Draft, twenty. (20) copies of the Public Hearing Draft will be transmitted to the City for distribution to appropriate individuals. PRODUCTS: 5 copies Administrative Draft 20 copies and 1 reproducible master of Public Hearing Draft TIME FRAME: 3 weeks Task 6.2 - Final Specific Plan Document An index of revisions made during the review of the Public Hearing Draft Specific Plan will be maintained as an ongoing addendum to the final Specific Plan Report. This will eliminate the need for repetitive and costly revisions to the report. Followirlg City Council adoption of the report, a final Specific Plan document will be transmitted to the City. The final Plans will be based on Urban Design StudJo's professional evaluation of input received of the Public Hearing Draft. PRODUCTS: One reproducible master of the Final Specific Plan (all text and graphics to be transmitted on several computer floppy disk) TIME FRAME: 1 month, depending on Public Hearings Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 City of Temecula 14 EXI-II~IT I~ PAY1VI~NT SCH~T)UI ~F~ R:\FORMS\CONTRACT.SVC 5130/97 k. lb COST The City's revised RFP for the Southside Specific Plan articulated eight specific activities that should be completed as part of this Specific Plan proposal. The revised RFP requested that we delete many task related to infrastructure market analysis and traffic. Budgets for these tasks have been deleted from the final fee. Urban Design Studio feels that there may be other tasks that should be completed. We feel these tasks are desirable or necessary, therefore our fee" includes all tasks contained in our proposal. It should be noted that this is a fixed fee and it is all inclusive. No fees beyond the fees articulated below will be paid to UDS. I TASK t TASK DESCRIPTION?: : ': I FEE ] 1.1 Define Project Requirements $ 700.00 1.2 Research of Existing Documents $500.00 1.3 Field Reconnaissance $1,000.00 1.4 Base Mapping $1,500.00 1.5 Baseline Infrastructure Analysis (deleted) 1.6 Market Analysis (deleted) 1.7 Opportunities and Constraints Analysis $3,100.00 2.1 Workshops (3) with Southside Committee $5.000.00 2.2 Saturday Storefront Workshop $1,500.00 2.3 Joint PC/CC Workshop $1,750.00 2.4 Personal Interviews $1,600.00 2.5 Public Hearings $2,500.00 2.6 Staff Liaison/Project Management $4,700.00 3.1 3.2 3.3 Existing Traffic/Parking Report (deleted) Traffic Improvements Report (deleted) Final Report (deleted) Southside Specific Plan Revised-1 City of Temecula COST I TASK 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.3 :TASK DESCRIPTION ' Goals and Policies Develop Alternative Land Use Plans Southside Master Plan Infrastructure Planning Report (deleted) FEE[ $1.000.00 $4,050.00 $5,100.00 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Land Use and Development Regulations Design Guidelines Final Regulations and Guidelines Streetscape Improvements Economic Implementation Strategies (deleted) $3,700.00 $5,0O0.00 $2,00O.0O $7,000.00 6.1 6.2 Administrative/Public Hearing Drafts Final Specific Plan $7,000.00 $3,0O0.00 Grand Total $61,700.00 Southside Specific Plan Revised-I Ci.ty of Temecula ITEM 17' APPROVAl, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~j~ June 10, 1997 Authorization to Execute Agreements for the Use of 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst}~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreements for the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds. That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements with the Emergency Food & Aid Program (Senior Center), the Parent Center, and Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VlP Tots) for administration of the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds. DISCUSSION: On January 28, 1997, the City Council recommended funding for 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects. The U.S. Department of Housing Urban Development (HUD) provides CDBG funding for local projects which meet at least one of the following nationally established goals: Low/moderate income persons are primarily benefitted by the activity; or The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or The activity meets an urgent (emergency) community development need. The projects and levels of funding approved by the Riverside Economic Development Agency (EDA) are as follows: Temecula Community Center Acquisition $ 211,000 Temecula Recreation and Human Services 15,500 Valley Family Support, Health & Rec Service 13,304 Emergency Food & Aid 10,000 Alternatives to Domestic Violence 1,000 Boys and Girls Club of Temecula 10,000 Operation School Bell 10,000 VlP Tots 1,000 Operation Safe House 500 Parent Center 1,000 TOTAL: $ 273.304 The total approved amount of $273,304 is $11,696 less than the $285,000 which the City Council recommended for funding during the January 28th meeting. The difference in funding reduced the amount awarded to the Valley Family Support, Health and Recreation Services (construction of a new "Parent Center" facility in Murrieta) to $13,304 from the $25,000 which the City Council had recommended. The total funding approved by the EDA was based on the City's total allocation of CDBG funds by HUD. Execution of the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Supplemental Agreements and Sub-Recipient Agreements facilitates CDBG funding for these projects. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Supplemental Agreements CDBG Sub-Recipient Agreement for VlP Program for Tots CDBG Sub-Recipient Agreement for Parent Center CDBG Sub-Recipient Agreement for the Emergency Food & Aid Program C ty of Temecula 43200 Burness Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 · Mail,r~jAddres~: P.O Box 9033 · Temecula, CA 9258%9033 (909) 6946444 · Fax (909) 694-1999 CDBG SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT Agreement made this 10th day of June, 1997, by and among the City of Temecula (City), a municipal corporation, and Emergency Food & Aid Program, a private, non-profit organization. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: Emergency Food & Aid Program provides emergency food and supplies to senior citizens in the Temecula Valley. The Emergency Food & Aid Program agrees to provide such services on a first come, first serve basis to all residents of the City of Temecula who need and request such services so long as economic resources permit. The Emergency Food & Aid Program agrees to keep such records, as necessary, to verify low and moderate income status of clients, and shall provide such data to the City of Temecula upon request. The Emergency Food & Aid Program shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside, their elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees, harmless from all claims, damages, losses, or liability of any kind or nature, including all reasonable attorney's fees and costs or liability of any kind or nature arising out of the acts or omissions of Emergency Food & Aid Program with respect to its work pursuant to this Agreement. The City agrees to provide the Emergency Food & Aid Program with funds equal to the costs allocable by the City of Temecula as agreed upon by the City, Riverside County Economic Development Agency, and the service provider. Emergency Food & Aid Program may request reimbursement from the City of Temecula by submitting three (3) copies of: the request; appropriate invoices; and paid receipts with either canceled checks (front and back), or proof of a petty cash disbursement, to the City of Temecula Finance Department. The City of Temecula will reimburse Emergency Food & Aid Program from the City's General Fund up to the City Council approved amount of $10,Q00 for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997. Costs incurred by the Emergency Food & Aid Program before the County's authorization date or anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997, which are determined by the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside to be unrelated to the approved CDBG project are ineligible and are not reimbursable by the City. The City of Temecula will request reimbursement for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997. This Agreement may not be assigned in whole, or in pan, without the written consent of the parties. 6. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30. 1998. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by written agreement signed by all parties. The Emergency Food & Aid Program shall abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement executed between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula dated June 10, 1997, which governs the use of CDBG funds. Emergency Food & Aid Program shall keep itself informed of all applicable State, Federal, and local laws and regulations, and the conditions of the CDBG grant to the County and the City. Emergency Food & Aid Program shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws, regulations, and conditions. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA EMERGENCY FOOD & AID PROGRAM Ronald E. Bradley City Manager Authorized Signature/Title Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk City of Temecula 43200 Bughess Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 · IV~il~ng Addr~: P C) Box 9033 · Temecula, CA 925139-9033 (909) 694-6444 · Fax (909) 694-1999 CDBG SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT Agreement made this 10th day of June, 1997, by and among the City of Temecula (City), a municipal corporation, and Parent Center, a private, non-profit organization. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: Parent Center provides quality educational and personal workshops, seminars, classes, and support groups to empower parents to build full functioning families. Parent Center agrees to provide such services on a first come, farst serve basis to all residents of the City of Temecula who need and request such services so long as economic resources permit. The Parent Center agrees to keep such records, as necessary, to verify low and moderate income status of clients, and shall provide such data to the City of Temecula upon request. The Parent Center shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside, their elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees, harmless from all claims, damages, losses, or liability of any kind or nature, including all reasonable attorney's fees and costs or liability of any kind or nature arising out of the acts or omissions of Parent Center with respect to its work pursuant to this Agreement. The City agrees to provide the Parent Center with funds equal to the costs allocable by the City of Temecula as agreed upon by the City, Riverside County Economic Development Agency, and the service provider. Parent Center may request reimbursement from the City of Temecula by submitting three (3) copies of: the request; appropriate invoices; and paid receipts with either canceled checks (front and back), or proof of a petty cash disbursement, to the City of Temecula Finance Department. The City of Temecula will reimburse Parent Center from the City's General Fund up to the City Council approved amount of $1,000 for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997. Costs incurred by the Parent Center before the County's authorization date or anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997, which are determined by the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside to be unrelated to the approved CDBG project are ineligible and are not reimbursable by the City. Co The City of Temecula will request reimbursement for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997. This Agreement may not be assigned in whole, or in part, without the written consent of the parties. 6. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30. 1998. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by written agreement signed by all parties. The Parent Center shall abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement executed between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula dated June 10, 1997, which governs the use of CDBG funds. Parent Center shall keep itself informed of all applicable State, Federal, and local laws and regulations, and the conditions of the CDBG grant to the County and the City. Parent Center shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws, regulations, and conditions. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA PARENT CENTER Ronald E. Bradley City Manager Authorized Signature/Title Peter M. Thorson City AUorney ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk City of Temecula 43200 Burness Park Drive · Temeodla, CA 92590 · Mailinc3/~ldress' P.O Box 9033 · Temeo~la, CA 92589-9033 (909) 6946444 · Fax 1909) ~94-1999 CDBG SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT Agreement made this 10th day of June, 1997, by and among the City of Temecula (City), a municipal corporation, and Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP Tots), a private, non-profit organization. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: VIP Tots, through its inter-generational volunteer program, matches senior citizens to at- risk families with chronically ill or disabled children. The VIP Tots agrees to provide such services on a fu'st come, fu'st serve basis to all residents of the City of Temecula who need and request such services so long as economic resources permit. The VIP Tots agrees to keep such records, as necessary, to verify low and moderate income status of clients, and shall provide such data to the City of Temecula upon request. The VIP Tots shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside, their elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees, harmless from all claims, damages, losses, or liability of any kind or nature, including all reasonable attorney's fees and costs or liability of any kind or nature arising out of the acts or omissions of VIP Tots with respect to its work pursuant to this Agreement. The City agrees to provide the VIP Tots with funds equal to the costs allocable by the City of Temecula as agreed upon by the City, Riverside County Economic Development Agency, and the service provider. VIP Tots may request reimbursement from the City of Temecula by submitting three (3) copies of: the request; appropriate invoices; and paid receipts with either canceled checks (front and back), or proof of a petty cash disbursement, to the City of Temecula Finance Department. The City of Temecula will reimburse VIP Tots from the City's General Fund up to the City Council approved amount of $1,000 for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997. Costs incurred by the VIP Tots before the County's authorization date or anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997, which are determined by the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside to be unrelated to the approved CDBG project are ineligible and are not reimbursable by the City. I~ P~'nted on Re~,cled Paper The City of Temecula will request reimbursemere for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997. This Agreement may not be assigned in whole, or in part, without the written consent of the parties. 6. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30. 1998. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by written agreement signed by all parties. The VIP Tots shall abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement executed between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula dated June 10, 1997, which governs the use of CDBG funds. VIP Tots shall keep itself informed of all applicable State, Federal, and local laws and regulations, and the conditions of the CDBG grant to the County and the City. VIP Tots shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws, regulations, and conditions. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA VALLEY INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOR TOTS (VIP Tots) Ronald E. Bradley City Manager Authorized Signature/Title Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk File No: 1.TM037, 038, 039, 043, 0.217, 0.218, 0.225, 0.228, 0.233, 1.126 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS 1 2 3 4 5 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, herein called, 6 "COUNTY," and the CITY of Temecula, herein called "CITY," mutually 7 agree as follows: 8 1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation 9 Agreement dated June 29, 1993, whereby CITY elected to participate 10 with COUNTY, which has qualified as an "Urban County" for purposes of 11 receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and to 12 assist and undertake essential community development and housing 13 assistance activities pursuant to the Housiog and Community 14 Development Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter referred to as "Act". 15 Said Cooperation Agreement dated June 29, 1993, is incorporated herein 16 by reference and made a part of this Agreement as if each and every 17 provision was set forth herein. 18 2. PURPOSE. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist 19 with the community development activities, within its jurisdiction, 20 by utilizing the sum of $273.304, CDBG Entitlement Funds, as 21 specifically identified in Exhibit "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, & J" 22 which are attached hereto and consist(s) of 3 pages (each), and by 23 this reference are incorporated herein, for the projects: 24 1.TM037 - Temecula Community Center Acquisition, $211,000 25 1.TM038 - Temecula Recreation and Human Services. $15,500 26 1.TM039-Valley Family Support, Health, and Recreation Service, $13,304 27 1.TM043 - Emergency Food & Aide, $10,000 28 0.217 - Operation School Bell. $10,000 1 0.218 - Boys & Girls Club of Temecula, $10,000 2 0.225 - V.I.P. Tots, $1,000 3 .0.228 - Operation SafeHouse. Emergency Service Transition, $500 4 0.233 - Domestic Violence Services, $1,000 5 1.126 - Parent Center, $10000 6 CITY shall obtain COUNTY's approval, through its Economic Development 7 Agency, of the projects plans and specifications prior to CITY's 8 construction of same when a project consists of a construction 9 activity. 10 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement for the 11 projects shall be for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 1997 to 12 June 30, 1998, and proceed consistent with the completion schedule set 13 forth in Exhibits "A, B, C, E, F, G, H, I, & J". In the event that 14 the projects are not substantially completed by the time set forth in 15 the completion schedule due to unforeseen or uncontrollable causes, 16 the schedule for the completion of the projects may be extended by the 17 period of the enforced delay. Times of performance may also be 18 extended in writing by the mutual agreement of CITY and COUNTY. If 19 substantial progress toward completion in conformance with the 20 completion schedule, as determined by COUNTY of the projects are not 21 made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, COUNTY may suspend 22 or terminate this agreement by the procedures set forth in the Section 23 titled "Termination", of this agreement and the entitlement funds 24 associated with the projects may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after 25 appropriate notice is given. 26 4. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors shal~ 27 determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds received 28 by COUNTY under the Act consistent with the provisions of Paragraphs 2 1 2 and 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY, through its Economic Development 2 Agency, shall: (1) make payment of the grant funds to CITY as 3 designated in Exhibits "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, & J", and (2) 4 monitor the projects activity to ensure compliance with applicable 5 federal regulations and the terms of this Agreement. CITY shall 6 comply with timely drawdown of funds by submitting monthly requests 7 for reimbursement. All disbursements of grant funds will be on a 8 reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) days after the CITY 9 has submitted its letter identifying payments and documentation which 10 supports expenditures. All authorized obligations incurred in the 11 performance of the Agreement must be reported by June 1, 1997 for 12 projects eligible under 570.201(e), Public Services. 13 5. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ACTIVITIES. CITY shall cooperate 14 with COUNTY in undertaking essential community development and housing 15 assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and public 16 assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY in carrying out its 17 Strategic Plan of the Consolidated Plan and other requirements of the 18 Community Development Block Grant Program. 19 6. LEAD AGENCY FOR COMP!.IANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA 20 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOA). Pursuant to ~Section 15051(d) of 21 Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, CITY is designated as 22 the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of this 23 Agreement. 24 7. HOT.D HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. CITY shall comply with 25 all applicable laws, rules and regulations, .and shall indemnify, save 26 and hold harmless COUNTY and its agency members and their respective 27 agents, servants and employees of and from any and all liabilities, 28 claims, debt, damages, demands, suits, actions and causes of action 1 of whatsoever kind, nature or sort including, but not by way 2 limitation, wrongful death, expenses of the defense of said parties, 3 and the payment of attorney's fees, arising out of or in any manner 4 connected with the performance by CITY under this Agreement. 5 8. RRCORDS AND INSPECTIONS. 6 a. CITY shall establish and maintain records in 7 accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 and Part 85 and OMB Circular A-87 as 8 applicable and as they relate to the acceptance and use of federal 9 funds under this Agreement. 10 b. -CITY shall maintain a separate account for CDBG 11 Entitlement funds received as set forth in Exhibits "A, B, C, D, E, 12 F, G, H, I & J". 13 c. CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make 14 available to COUNTY and to the Department of Housing and Urban 15 Development for examination and copying all of its records and other 16 materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement. 17 d. CITY shall retain all program income as defined in 18 Section 570.500 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations. Said 19 program income shall be used only for the activity that is the subject 20 of this Agreement. Further, all provisions of this Agreement shall 21 apply to such activity. 22 e. The CITY shall ensure projects that are serving 23 limited clientele (570.208(a) (2) (i), that at least fifty-one percent 24 (51%) of the persons benefitting from the CDBG funded activities are 25 of low and moderate income and meet the program income guidelines 26_ attached as Exhibit IG. The CITY must provide the direct benefi' 27 documentation required. 28 9. FEDERAL REOUIREMENTS. CITY shall comply with the 4 1 provisions of the Act and any amendments thereto and the federal 2 regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the 3 Act. More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations 4 found in Part 85 and Part 570 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal 5 Regulations. CITY is to comply with OMB Circular A-87, or any 6 subsequent replacement. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the 7 Community Development Block Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and cited 8 in the above-mentioned Cooperation Agreement. 9 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and its agents, servants 10 and employees shall act at all times in an independent capacity during 11 the term of this Agreement, and shall not act as, shall not be, nor 12 shall they in any manner be construed to be agents, officers or 13 employees of the COUNTY. 14 11. TERMINATION. 15 a. 'CITY. CITY may not terminate this Agreement 16 except upon express written consent of COUNTY. 17 b.. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 18 11a, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this Agreement upon written 19 notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason for such action: 20 (1) In the event CITY fails to perform the 21 covenants herein contained at such times and in such manner as 22 provided in this Agreement; and 23 (2) In the event there is a conflict with any 24 federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation or rule rendering 25 any of the provisions of this Agreement invalid or untenable; or 26 (3) In the event the funding from the Department 27 of Housing and Urban Development referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2 28 above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable. 1 ¢. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees t¢ 2 return any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY. 3 In accepting said funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause of 4 action it may have against CITY for breach of this Agreement. 5 d. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees not 6 to incur any additional cost with regard to the projects that are 7 cited in the written notice as necessitating the suspensions. 8 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by Sections 570.601 9 and 570.602 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations which 10 requires that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of 11 race, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from participation 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Community Development funds. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFI.ICTS OF INTEREST a. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with the CDBG.regulations prohibiting conflicts of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611, attached hereto as Exhibit "CI" and by this reference incorporated herein. b. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers, and elected. and appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with Section A-11 of the County's CDBG Policy manual, attached hereto as Exhibit "CI" and by this reference incorporated herein. c. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver o~ exception can be granted to the prohibition against conflict of interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR 1 570.611 (d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be 2 reviewed by COUNTY to determine whether such request is appropriate 3 for submission to HUD. In determining whether such request is 4 appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors 5 listed in 24 CFR 570.611 (e). 6 d. Prior to any funding under this Agreement, CITY shall 7 provide COUNTY with a list of all employees, agents, consultants, 8 officers and elected and appointed officials who are in a position to 9 participate in a decision making process, exercise any functions or 10 responsibilities, or gain inside information with respect to the CDBG 11 activities funded under this Agreement. CITY shall also promptly 12 disclose to COUNTY any potential conflict, including even the 13 appearance of conflict, that may arise with respect to the CDBG 14 activities funded under this Agreement. 15 e. Any violation of this section shall be deemed a 16 material breach of this Agreement, and the Agreement shall be 17 immediately terminated by the COUNTY. 18 14. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, COUNTY 19 shall bear no liability for any later determination by the United 20 States Government, the Department of Housing and Urban Development or 21 any other person or entity that CITY is or is not eligible under 24 22 CFR Part 570 to receive CDBG funds. 23 15. USR OF PROPERTY. Whenever CDBG federal or program income 24 are used, in whole or in part, for the purchase of equipment or 25 personal property, the property shall not be transferred for a period 26 of five (5) years from the date of purchase or completion of 27 construction without COUNTY approval. The CITY shall maintain an 281 inventory for COUNTY review. 1 16. E~PT.OYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. CIT~ 2 agrees to notify and to require any lessee or assignee to notify 3 Riverside County JTPD (Jobs Training Partnerships Department) and GAIN 4 - Department of Public Social Services of any and all job openings 5 that are caused by this project. 6 17. PUBLICITY. Any publicity generated by CITY for the 7 projects funded pursuant to this Agreement, during the term of this 8 Agreement, will make reference to the Contribution of the County of 9 Riverside Community Development Block Grant Program in making the 10 project possible. 11 18. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVA!.UATION. CITY shall be 12 monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely 13 compliance with the provisions of this Agreement and the effective and 14 efficient achievement of the Program Objectives. Quarterly reports 15 shall be due on the last day of the month immediately following the 16 end of the quarter being reported. The quarterly written reports 17 shall include, but shall not be limited to the following data 18 elements: 19 a. Title of program, listing of componenets, description 20 of activities/operations. 21 b. The projected goals, indicated numerically, and also 22 the goals achieved (for each report period). In addition, identify 23 by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards meeting 24 the specified goals; additionally, identify any problems encountered 25 in meeting goals. 26 c. Beneficiaries 27 Provide the following: 28 1) Total number of direct beneficiaries 1 2) Percent of total number of direct beneficiaries 2 who are: 3 · Low and moderate income 4 · Low income 5 · Black, not Hispanic origin 6 · White, not Hispanic origin 7 · Hispanic 8 · American Indian/Alaskan Native 9 · Asian or Pacific Islander 10 · Female Headed Households 11 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this 12 Agreement together with the cooperation Agreement between the parties, 13 embodies the entire agreement of the parties in relation to the 14 subject matter thereof, and that no other Agreement or understanding, 15 verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject matter, exists between 16 the parties at the time of execution. 17 20. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Executive Director of the COUNTY's 18 Economic Development Agency or his or her designee(s) are authorized 19 to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or appropriate 20 to implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Agreement 211 as it may be amended from time to time by COUNTY. 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 21. modified or amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized and empowered representative of COUNTY respectively. DATED: MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be and CITY ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors By: Deputy (Seal) DATED: ATTEST: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Mayor SW:AA:ri F:\USERS\CDBG\1S~TM\SUPAGR97.037 10 .IBIT A r~ge 1 SUPPT.EMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE: 1.TM037 Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula Address: 26442 Beckman Court,Temecula0 CA 92590 Project Title: Temecula Community Center Acquisition Location: 28816 Pujo] Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Description: City of Temecula purposes to use CDBG funds to make final payment on the newly acquired building and adjacent property. The building and property is being used as a community center and neighborhood park providng recreation and human services in the Old Town Temecula area providing recreation and human services. This is the second year of a two (2) year project, using two (2) consecutive CDBG funding cycles. Project Budget: Cost CDBG Approved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ 211,000 $ 211,000 EXHIBIT A Page 2 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone Begin Project Semi-Annual Monitoring Report Monitoring Site Visit Start Date 07/1/97 12/97 7/97 FILE: 1.~ Completion Date 6/30/98 12/97 6/98 'IBIT A ~e 3 FILE: 1.TM037 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FROM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO July 1, 1997 June 30, 1998 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-97-UC-06-0506 Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT Temecula Community Center Acquisition 6. PROJECT NUMBER 1.TM037 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Exempt 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT City of Temecula 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER (909) 694-6480 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: City of Temecula purposes to use CDBG funds to make final payment on the newly acquired building and adjacent property. The building and property is being used as a community center and neighborhood park providng recreation and human services in the Old Town Temecula area providing recreation and human services. This is the second-year of a two' (2) year project, using two (2) consecutive CDBG funding cycles. GIBILITY: 570.201(a) BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (1) (i) 11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) 432.05 (low/mod target area survey) 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Acquisition of building and adjacent property to be used as a community center and neighborhood park. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) $ S $ Acquisition 211.000 Totals $ 211,000 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 211.000 EXHIBIT B Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FILE Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula Address: 28816 Pujol St.,Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Temecula Recreation and Human Services Location: 28816 Pujol Street. Temecula, CA 92590 Description: CDBG funds will be used to off-set the community center's staff cost associated with the coordination and implementation of recreation and human services programs in the community of Old Town Temecula. Additional operation costs include: supplies, utilities and equipment. Programs that will be provided are: recreational and cultural activities, social/human services such as: medical, legal assistance and parenting classes. Project Budget: Cost CDBG Approved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ 15,500 $ 15.500 ~IBIT B Fage 2 FILE: 1.TM038 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone Start Date Completion Date Begin Project Monthly Grantee Status Report Semi-Annual Monitoring Report Monitoring Site Visit 07/1/97 7/97 12/97 7/97 6/30/98 6/30/98 1/98 6/98 EXHIBIT B Page 3 FILE: 1.TM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FROM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO July 1, 1997 June 30, 1998 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-97-UC-06-0506 4 o X Original (each year) Revision, Date __Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT Temecula Recreation and Human Services 6. PROJECT NUMBER 1.TM038 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Exempt 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Temecula (909) 694-6480 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: CDBG funds will be used to off-set the community center's staff cost associated with the coordination and implementation of recreation and human services programs in the community of Old Town Temecula. Additional operation costs include: supplies, utilities and equipment. Programs that will be provided are: recreational and cultural activities, social/human services such as: medical, legal assistance and parenting classes. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(e) BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (1) (i) 11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) 432.05 (low/mod target area survey) 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Provide recreational and cultural activities to approximately 2,000 individuals. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY. Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) $ $ Public Service 15,500 14. Totals $ 15,500 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 15,500 qIBIT C ~e 1 FILE: 1.TM039 SUPPLEMENTAT. AGREEMENT Cooperative Agency: Murrieta Valley Unified School Dist. Parent Center Address: 245!5 Lincoln Avenue,Murrieta, CA 92562 Project Title: Valley Family Support, Health, and Recreation Serv. Location: Temecula Valley Description: The Parent Center/MVUSD plan to use CDBG funds to offset the cost associated with the purchase or construct a multi-use facility that can be shared with various non-profit agencies. Agencies that are collaborating on the multi use facility have a common goal to provide services to low/mod income individuals. Services that will be provided are child care, health, recreational, substance abuse, youth and alternative to domestic violence services. Project Budget: Cost 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency $ o CDBG Approved 13,304 TOTAL $ $ 13.304 EXHIBIT C Page 2 FILE: 1.T Timetable Implementation Schedule M~lestone Begin Project Monthly Grantee Status Report Semi-Annual Monitoring Report Monitoring Site Visit Start Date 7/97 7/97 1/98 12/97 Completion Date 6/30/98 6/30/98 2/98 6/98 -"qIBIT C FILE: 1.TM039 e3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY FROM TO 4. July 1. 1997 June 30. 1998 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-97-UC-06-0506 ~ Original (each year) __Revision, Date __Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER Valley Family Support, Health, 1.TM039 and Recreation Serv. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Exempt 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER Murrieta Valley Unified School Dist. Parent Center (909) 696-1588 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Parent Center/MVUSD plan to use CDBG .funds to offset the cost associated with the purchase or construct a multi-use facility that can be shared with various non-profit agencies. Agencies that are collaborating on the multi use facility have a common goal to provide services to low/mod income individuals. Services that will be provided are child care, health, recreational, substance abuse, youth and alternative to domestic violence services. GIBILITY: 570.201(a) BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (2) (i) (B) 11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) Limited Clientele 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Acquisition of building or built a multi-use facility to be shared with various non-profit agencies. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) $ $ $ Acquisition 13,304 Totals $ 13,304 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 13,304 EXHIBIT D Page 1 SUPPT,FMRNTA!, AGRFRMRNT FILE: 1.TF- ~ Cooperative Agency: Temecula Senior Center - City of Temecula Address: 40250 Winchester Road. Temecula, CA 92586 Project Title: Emergency Food & Aide Location: 40250 Winchester Road, Temecula Description: The senior center provides an emergency food program for 5,000 individuals that may be homeless, elderly, handicapped and for migrant farm workers. CDBG funds will be used to purchase food and supplies, also operational cost, salaries, travels, telephone and utilities. Project Budget: Cost CDBG Approved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ 10.000 $ 10,000 -"HIBIT D ~e 2 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone Begin Project Monthly Grantee Status Report Semi-Annual Monitoring Report Monitoring Site Visit Start Date 7/97 7/97 12/97 12/97 FILE: 1. TM043 Completion Date 6/30/98 6/30/98 2/98 6/98 EXHIBIT D Page 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FROM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO July 1, 1997 5. NAME OF PROJECT Emergency Food & Aide June 30, 1998 6. PROJECT NUMBER 1.TM043 FILE: 1.TMc 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-97-UC-06-0506 X Original (each year) __Revision, Date Amendment, Date 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Exempt 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER Temecula Senior Center - City of Temecula (909) 676-5155 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The senior center provides an emergency food program for 5,000 individuals that may be homeless, elderly, handicapped and for migrant farm workers. CDBG funds will be used to purchase food and supplies, also operational cost, salaries, travels, telephone and utilities. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(e) BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (2) (i) (A) 11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) Limited Clientele 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Provide an emergency food program for 5,000 individuals. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) $ $ $ Publis Service 10,000 14. Totals $ 10.000 $ $ 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $ 10.000 ~"~IBIT E FILE: 0.217 e 1 SUPPT,FMENTA!, AGREEMENT Assistance T.eague of Temecula Valley-City of Lake Flsinore 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ ~s project has been funded by: Cost CDBG Approved S 10,000 $ 10,000 City of Lake Elsinore City of Murrieta City of Temecula Total $ 2,000 5,000 10,000 $17,000 Cooperative Agency: Address: 27464 Commerce Center Dr., Ste. K,Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Operation School Bell Location: 27464 Commerce Center Drive, Suite K, Temecula, CA 92590 Description: Operation School Bell will provide new clothing and school supplies for approximately 700 school age children of the cities of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore, and the Temecula School District. The clothing provided consists of shoes, 3 pairs of socks and underclothing, jeans, slacks or skirts, sweatshirt, and jacket. This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the Cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and Temecula. 'ject Budget: EXHIBIT F Page 1 FILE: 0.218 SUPPT.EMENTAI. AGREEMENT Cooperative Agency: Roys & Girls Club of Temecula -City of Murrieta Address: 28790 Pujol St.,Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Boys & Girls Club of Temecula Location: 28790 Pujol St., Temecula. CA 92590 - City of Murrieta Description: Funds will be used to provide child care services through the off-track and Am/Pm program, Monday through Friday. The program will run year round, providing child care for 550 school age children from 1st grade through 8th grade. These children are from low/moderate income families, 30% from 1st district unincorporated area and 70% between the cities of Temecula and Murrieta. This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the First District, Cities of Murrieta and Temecula. Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ This project has been funded by: Cost CDBG Approved $ 10,000 First District City of Murrieta City of Temecula Total $ 10.000 $14,000 22,776 10.000 $46,776 FVHIBIT G FILE: 0.225 e 1 SUPP!,EMENTAL AGREEMENT Cooperative Agency: V.I.P. Tots Address: 41915 East Acacia St,Hemet. CA 92544 Project Title: V.!.P. Tots Location: 41915 E Acacia St. Hemet, CA Description: V.I.P. Tots will use CDBG funds to expand and enhance the provision of educational services for 80 children with various disabilities. Specifically, funds will be used to purchase new computer technology specially designed for children with developmental, physical disabilities and visual/hearing impairment. This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the Third District and City of.Temecula. Project Budget: _j Architect/Engineer Design Costs 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL Cost CDBG Approved S 1,000 $ 1,000 This project has been funded by: Third District City of Temecula Total $ 1,000 1,000 $ 2,000 EXHIBIT H Page 1 SUPPT,EMENTAT, AGREEMENT FILE: 0.228 Cooperative Agency: Operation SafeHouse, Inc. Address: 9685 Hayes Street,Riverside, CA 92503 Project Title: Operation SafeHouse, Emergency Service Transition Location: 9685 Hayes Street, City of Riverside Description: The program is projecting to serve approximately 650 youth in FY 97/98. CDBG funds will be used to off-set the operation and maintenance cost (salaries, rent, telephone, and supplies) of the shelter in order to provide additional safe shelter, food, clothing, and counseling. This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the Third District, Fifth District and City of Temecula. Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ This project has been funded by: Cost CDBG Approved $ 5OO Third District Fifth District City of Temecula Total $ 500 $ 2,500 5,000 5O0 $ 8,000 EXHIBIT I Page 1 SUPPT.~MENTAT. AGREEMENT FILE: 0.233 Cooperative Agency: Alternatives to Domestic Violence Address: PO Box 910,Riverside. CA 92502 Project Title: Domestic Violence Services Location: Western Riverside County Description: ADV provides victims of domestic violence with an outreach support program. CDBG funds will be used for costs that include salaries/benefits and operating expenses (telephone, rent, etc.) This funding will allow ADV to continue and expand current services such as transitional housing services, crisis intervention counseling, emergency shelter, and advocacy services, throughout Riverside County. This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf.of the First, Second, Third and Fith Districts, Cities of Banning, Beaumont, San Jacinto and Temecula. Project Budget: · Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ This project has been funded by: Cost CDBG Approved $ 1. 000 First District Second District Third District Fifth District City of Banning City of Beaumont City of San Jacinto City of Temecula Total $ 1,000 $15,000 15 000 10 000 28 250 3 000 5 000 3 000 10000 $ 80,250 EXHIBIT J Page 1 FILE: 1.__6 SUPPT.F. MENTAL AGREEMENT Cooperative Agency: Parent Center - Murrieta Valley Unified School District Address: 24515 Lincoln Ave,Murrieta, CA 92562 Project Title: Parent Center Location: 24515 !.incoln Ave.. Murrieta. CA 92562 Description: The program will provide parents with parenting, English as a second language, GED and math classes. In addition, workshops on parenting issues relating to youth and drugs, alcohol abuse, gang participation, homework strategies and child development. Funds will be used for salaries, supplies and training. This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency on behalf of the First District and City of Temecula. Project Budget: 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ This project has been funded by: Cost First District City of Temecula Total CDBG Approved 1.000 $ 1,000 $10,000 1,000 $11,000 Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest EXHIBIT CI , page 1 of 4 § 570.611 Conflict of interest. (a) (1) App]icability. In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services by recipients, and by subrecipients (including those specified at § 570.204(c)), the conflict of interest provisions in 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB circular A 110, respectively, shall apply. (2) In all cases not governed by 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A-110, the provisions of this section shall apply. Such cases include the acquisition and disposition of real property and the provision of assistance by the recipient, by its subrecipients, or to individuals, businesses and other private entities under eligible activities which authorize such assistance (e.g., rehabilitation, preservation, and other improvements of private properties or facilities pursuant to § 570.202, or grants, loans and other assistance to businesses, individuals and other private entities pursuant to § 570.203, § 570.204 or § 570.455). Conflicts prohibited. Except for the. use of CDBG funds to pay salaries a~d other related administrative or personnel costs, the general rule is that no persons described in paragraph (c) of this section who exercise or have exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to CDBG activities assisted under this part or who are in a position to participate in a decision making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from a CDBG assisted activity, or have an interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. For the UDAG program, the above restrictions shall apply to all activities that are a part of the UDAG project, and shall cover any such interest or benefit during, or at any time after, such person's tenure. (c) Persons covered. The conflict of interest provisions of paragraph (b) of this section apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected official or appointed official of the recipient, or of any designated public agencies, or subrecipients which are receiving funds under this part. (d) Exceptions: threshold requirements. Upon the written request of the recipient, HUD may grant an exception to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section on a case-by-case basis when it determines that such an exception will serve to further the purposes of the Act and the effective and efficient administration of the recipient's program or project. An exception may be ~onsidered only after the recipient has provided the following: (1) A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by an assurance that there has been public disclosure of the conflict and a description of how the public disclosure was made; and Prohibition Against Conflicts of Int EXHIBIT CI, page 2 of 4 (2) (e) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) An opinion of the recipient's attorney that the interest for which the exception is sought would not Violate State or local law. Factors to be considered for exceptions. In determining whether to grant a requested exception after the recipient has satisfactorily met the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, HUD shall consider the cumulative effect of the following factors, where applicable: Whether the exception would provide a significant cost benefit or an essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would otherwise not be available; Whether an opportunity was provided for .open competitive bidding or negotiation; Whether the person affected is a member of a group or class of low or moderate income persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the ass: ed activity, and the exception will permit such person to receive gene the same interests or benefits as are being made available or provideu to the group or class; Whether the affected person has withdrawn from his or her functions or responsibilities, or the decision making process with respect to the specific assisted activity in question; Whether the interest or benefit was present before the affected person was in a position as described in paragraph (b) of this section; Whether undue hardship will result either to the recipient or the person affected when weighed against the public interest served by avoiding the prohibited conflict; and (7) Any other relevant considerations. Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest Rxhibit CT, page 3 of 4 Community Dvlpmt. Block Grant Policy Manual I.D. # A-11 (pg. 1 of 2) TOPIC: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODED RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: October 1989 This Conflict of Interest Code is written to comply with Federal Regulations (24 CFR Part 85). These Regulations. "Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments" require that grantees and sub-grantees will maintain.a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer or agent of the grantee shall participate in the b=±ection, in the award or in the administration of a contract supported by Federal Funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. 2) Such a conflict will arise when: i) The employee, officer or agent; ii) Any member of the immediate family; iii) His/Her partners, or; iv) An organization which employs, or is about to employ any of the above has a financial or other interest in the firm's selection for award. 3) The grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to sub-agreements except as noted in Section 4. 4) A grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will be presumed to have a financial interest in a business if their financial interest exceeds the following: i) Any business entity in which the official has a direct or indirect investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. ±i) Any real property in which the official has a direct or indirect interest worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest Exhibit CI, page 4 of 4 TOPIC: DATE: iii) iv) v) 5) Community Dvlpmt. Block Grant Policy Manual I.D. # A-11 (pg. 2 of 2) CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY October 1989 Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. Any business entity in which the official is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or o~fts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provid, o, received by, or promised to the official within 12 months prior t time when the decision is made. For purposes of Section 4, indirect investment or interest means an5 investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of ar official, by an agent on behalf of an official, or by a business entity o2 trust in which the official, the official's agents, spouse, and dependen~ children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a 10-percent interes~ or more. ITEM 18 ORDINANCE NO. f~'/-10 AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUI.,A, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. $ BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR TM 23100, 23101, 23103 AND TIM 28503, WITHIN SPF_,C]FIC PLAN NO. 199 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0030) WItEREAS, Section 65864 et li:tl. of the Government Code of the State of California and Temecula City Resolution No. 91-52 authorize the execution of agreements establishing and maintaining requirements applicable m the development of real property; and, WITEREAS, in accordance with the procedure specified in said Resolution, Bramalea California, LLC has filed with the City of Temecula an application for a Development Agreement which reflects an amendment and restatement of existing County Development Agreement No. 5 (hereinafter "this Agreement"), of a residential housing subdivision on its property for Tracts 23100, 23101, 23103 and 28503 (305 lots), hereinafter the "Subject Property" which application has been reviewed and accepted for filing by the Community Development Director; and, WHEREAS, notice of the City's intention to consider adoption of this Agreement with Bramalea California, LLC has been duly given in the form and manner required by law, and the Planning Commission and City Council of said City have each conducted public hearings on April 21, 1997 and May 5, 1997 (Planning Commission), and May 27, 1997 (City Council) at which time it heard and considered all evidence relevant and material to said subject. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~ DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. FINDINGS. The City Council hereby finds and determines, with respect to this Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Bramalea California, LLC that it: A. Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that this Agreement makes reasonable provision for the use of certain real property for residential development consistent with the General Plan's land use designation of Low-Medium Density Residential; B. Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which the Subject Property referred to herein is located as this Agreement provides for residential development pursuant to a Specific Plan; C. Is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance of land uses compatible with the remainder of the City; D. Will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare because it provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof; E. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days before the Planning Commission public hearing, and mailed or delivered at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; F. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the date, time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the heating body, a general explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description in text or diagram of the location of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to exhaust administrative remedies; G. Notice of the public heating before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the City Council public hearing, mailed at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant, to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; H. Notice of the City Council hearing included the date, the time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, the general explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the Property that is the subject of the hearing, and the notice of the need to exhaust administrative remedies; I. City Council approves this Agreement by Ordinance based upon evidence and findings of the Planning Commission and new evidence presented at its hearing on this Agreement, giving its reasons therefor and setting forth the relationship between this Agreement and the General Plan; J. The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from this Agreement are as follows: 1. Generation of municipal revenue; 2, Construction of public infrastructure facilities; 3. Acceleration of both the timely development of subject property as well as the payment of municipal revenue; 4. Enhancement of quality of life for surrounding re, dents with the timely development through the elimination of dust and nuisance of partially improved lots; and 5. Payment of Public Facility Fees (fire, library, traffic signal mitigation, development and RSA). Section 2. APPROVAl,. This Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit A, is hereby approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Mayor is authorized and directed to evidence such approval by executing this Agreement for, and in the name of, the City of Temecula; and the City Clerk is directed to attest thereto; provided, however, that this Agreement shall not be executed by the City until this Ordinance takes effect and the City has received from the applicant two executed originals of said Agreement. Section 3. ,RF, VI::.IZARII,ITy. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. NOTICI::, OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 00) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June, 1997. Patricia Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEIVIEL-~3LA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No.97-10 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 27th day of May, 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of May 1997, by the following vote, to wit: COUNCILMI~MBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk Employment 14,505 16,366 17,768 18,056 19,714 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 ISoume: CA EmploymenlDevelopmentDepa~mentl City Employment, 1991-1996... · In 1996. employment within the City of Temecula reached 19,714. This was a 6,124 job gain since the first half of 1991 or 45.1%. · Despite the recession, Temecula's employment has increased consistently from 1991-1996. · Manufacturing has become the city's largest sector with 5,455 jobs. It is followed by Retail Trade at 4,370 and the Government, Education & Utility sector group at 1,910. The smallest sector was Engineering & Management at 393 workers. · The fastest growth rate from 1991-1996 was found in Hotel & Amusement, up 238.5% to 860 jobs. Next was Business Services, up 112.0%; and Distribution & Transportation, up 80.2%. In that period, two related sectors have lost jobs: Engineering & Management and Construction. Exhibit 44.-Employment Summary City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 Sector 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 %91-96 Manufactunng 5,455 5,281 5,108 4,750 3,605 3,209 70.0% Retail Trade 4,370 4,178 4,074 3,498 3,204 2,867 52.4% Government & Education & Utilities 1,910 1,819 1,759 1,483 1,383 1,225 55.9% Distribution & Transportation 1,445 1,201 999 986 1,026 802 80.2% Agriculture 1,193 956 1,109 1,127 986 1,086 9.9% Construction 1,130 866 894 898 1,172 1,463 -22.8% Other Services & Help Supply Agencies 1,048 1,102 1,262 931 831 617 69.9% Hotel & Amusement 860 434 470 427 289 254 238.5% Business Services 777 726 584 521 346 366 112.0% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 571 570 675 575 541 554 2.9% Health Services 563 600 472 442 416 371 51.8% Engineering & Management 393 325 363 729 708 776 -49.4% TOTAL 19,714 18,056 17,768 16,366 14,506 13,590 45.1% SouRCE: CA Employment Development Department CiP,.' of lcntrcula l'~vpan, d by Joint IK llusing, l'h.l). Page 26 Employment Exhibit 45.-Wage & Salary Employment Gain By Sector City of Temecula, First S-Months, 1996 Mfg Retail 6{36 4.1 4!0 ) Travel ,Serv/Help Bus._Sv Health Gov/Edu 168 Agr i Soume: CA Employment Development Department I ........ Fin/RE Const (383) ........ Eng/Mgt Employment By Sector 1996, & Job Growth, 1991-1996... · Temecula's beautiful surroundings, and concerted effort to lure high technology firms have made manufac- turing the city's fastest growing sector numerically since 1991, up 2,246 jobs. When a commumty sees increasing monies flow to it from the outside world, owing to the expansion of sec- tors like Manufacturing and Distribution & Transportation, the secondary tier of its economy, including Re- tail Trade (1,503), government & education(685) expands as a restfit. In five of the past six years, Temecula has added jobs much faster than the Inland Empire. For instance, in 1996, it grew 9.2% versus 3.6% for the region. In 1993, it was 12.8% versus 0.6%. The only pause was a slow 1.6%job growth in 1995, against 3.7% for the region. Exhibit 46.-Wage & Salary Employment Growth Rates City of Teme cula & Inland Empire, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 ImTemecula I:31nland Empire 12.8% 8.6% 9,2% 1992 3.7% 2.2% 1,6% 0.6% 1993 1994 1995 ISource: CA Employment Development DepartmentI 3.6% 1996 ('it3. of Tcmccula kS"l'~ifff~, P~p:m'd by &~hn E. Ilusin~o, l'h.I). Page 27 Employment Exhibit 47.-Employment Distribution By Sector, 1996 City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1996 (21.4%) Oth~...~.~.,..~ ~-.__. (27.7%) Mfg (5.7%) co.= !~"'~"~'"';~,/~ ~ 3%) Di~'::' -:~ .... ~ ¢2.2%) Retail (9.7%) Gov/Edu ISource:CA Employment Development Depa~tmentl Employment Distribution, 1996 & 1991... · In 1996, 27.7% of Temecula's jobs were in Manufacturing. This was up from 23.6% in 1991 as the sector added 2,246 jobs. · Most of other sectors maintained a relatively stable share of the city's jobs. An exception was Distribution & Transportation which rose from 5.9% to 7.3%. · Construction employment fell from 10.8% to 5.7% of the market as city housing sales slowed dramatically. This sector will increase its share of employment in 1997 as residential markets are beginning to recover. Exhibit 48.-Employme nt Distribution By Sector, 1991 City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991 (21.6%) Other ~ (23.6%) Mfg ISource:CA Employment Development Department (*it) of 'l't'mecula k"f~'11'~ l'rt, parrd by Jolm 'E. 1Iusin~, l'h.D. l'a~e 28 Employment Exhibit 49.-Wage & Salary Payroll City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 nominal & CPI Adjusted '1 [] no.inal · c.~ adiust.d [ -- $183 ................................................... ~1~ ............. ~ $153 I.$~09 ............ $.1.1.3 ....... $205'~ $122 ::::$135 $225 $248 $146 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Isourc,: c^ Employment Development Department I 1996 Wage & Salary Payroll 1991-1996... · In 1991, the payroll for firms located in Temecula's was $153 million. In 1996, it was $248 million. That was a gain of $95 million or 62.1% in just 5-years. * When allowance is made for the increases in the Southern California Consumer Price Index, the purchasing power of Temecula's payroll (1982-1984 dollars) rose from $109 million to $157 million, a $48 million gain. * Of the $95 million increase in payroll, 11.7% or $18 million was attributable to inflation. The other $77 million represented a real increase in purchasing power or 50.3%. Exhibit 50.-Components of Payroll Growth City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 _ $95 mil (62.1%) $77 mil (50.3%) $18 mil (11.7%) Nominal Growth Inflation Purchasing Power Growth Source: CA Employment Development Department ~ ('i~' ol*'l'emecula Prepared b3 &Dim F. Ilu~in.o, l~h.I). l'a~e 29 Employment Exhibit 51.-Wage & Salary Payroll Summar3' City of Temecula, Fh'st 6-Months, 1991-1996 Sector 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 % 91-6 Manufactunng $94,755,933 $91,397,735 $80,642,084 $69,962,246 $56,167,819 $46,300,028 104.7% RetailTrade 34,523,515 31,528,310 28,095,495 23,035,700 21,686,065 20,854,009 65.5% Govt. &Education. &Util. 26,355,771 24,879,021 24,496,370 21,238,920 1g,650,701 17,677,432 49.1% Distribution& Transportation22,484,673 18,110,445 14,790,175 13,838,499 12,954,562 9,710,962 131.5% Construction 15,744,401 12,331,961 11,078,009 11,438,225 13,859,939 16,473,465 -4.4% Agriculture 10,558,314 8,293,777 8,400,188 8,234,407 7,569,515 7,464,499 41.4% Other Services & Help Agcy. 9,322,289 8,605,825 8,194,670 7,031,789 6,000,793 4,731,514 97.0% Fmance, Insurance, RcalEst. 8,578,573 8,910,207 10,616,338 8,552,836 7,863,238 9,037,977 -5.1% Business Services 7,507,968 6,170,119 4,784,707 4,046,442 3,275,495 4,371,733 71.7% Health Services 6,508,300 6,523,824 4,992,687 4,453,086 4,017,408 3,565,263 82.5% Engineering & Management 6,156,188 6,433,787 6,600,648 8,981,029 9,802,957 11,427,677 -46.1% Hotel &:Amusement 5,068,238 2,265,383 2,395,228 2,325,688 1,626,472 1,130,785 348.2% TOTAL $247,664.163 $228,450,394 $206,086,699 $183,138,867 $164,474,964 $152,745,34462.1% Payroll Trends By Sector... 1991-1996 In 1996, Temecula's largest payroll was in Manufacturing ($94.8 million), followed by Retail Trade ($34.5 million). Government, Education & Utilities ($26.4 million), and Distribution & Transportation ($15. 7 mil- lion) The Manufacturing payroll was up a very strong $48 million or 104.7% from 1991-1996. In dollar terms, Retail Trade grew second fastest, up $13.6 million or 65.5%. Distribution & Transportation grew $12.7 mil- lion, or 131.5%, moving it from the sixth to the fourth largest paying employer group. · The ciB"s weakest growth was in Engineering & Management, off$5.3 million or -46.1% Exhibit 52.-Wage & Salary Payroll Gain By Sector City of Temecula & Inland Empire, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 $48imil ! : ' J $14~md$131mll' ......... .........' ........ .....i ........... ............... .............................................................................................................. ~ ..........................................................L ......}..~.imit ........ Mfg ~etail ~ Gov~du 8e~/~lp Travel Bu~Sv Agr ~alth ~n/RE ~n~ Eng~gl I$ou .: ~ Employment ~velopment ~pa~ment I ('iD ~J!' Tt'mccula l'~rpa~d by Jolm E. llusin~-, Ph.l). PaRe 30 Employment Exhibit 53.-Wage & Salary Payroll Per Worker City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 nominal & CPI Adjusted $22,480 S15,96g [~] nonlnal 1991 $24.972 $25,115 $22,678 $22,381 $2&13~5 's16,125 $15,967 515,533 $14,931 $15,231 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 I Source: CA EmDIoyment Development Department ~ Pay Per Worker, 1991-1996... Temecula workers were paid an average of $22,480 in 1991. In 1996, the average rose to $25,115, an 11.7% gain. The 1996 average was the city's $248 million payroll divided by its 19,714 full & part time workers. Southern California prices rose 11.7% between 1991 and 1996, roughly equal to the 11.7% growth in cid' average pay. Thus, the $2,636 gain in average pay, was matched by a $2,640 increase in prices, leaving workers $4.55 worse off in today's purchasing power. · In 1982-1984 constant prices, the purchasing power of the city's average pay also remained almost constant, falling $2 from $15,969 to $15,967. In 1996 prices, the decline was $4.55 · Note that average payroll is no~t average worker family income. The latter often includes income from more than one worker. Exhibit 54.-Components of Average Payroll Per Worker Change City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 -- $2,636 (11.7%) $2,640 (11.7%) Nominal Growth ($4.55) (.o.o%) Inflation Purohasing Power Growth ISource: CA Employment Development Depa~trnentI (.'iO' of Tcmecula l'tvpan~d by Jolm 'E. 11using, l'h.D. Page 31 Employment Exhibil 55.-Average Pay Per XVorker City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 Sector 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 %91-96 Manufacturing $34,710 $34,615 $31,577 $29,480 $31,191 $28,842 20.3% Engineering & Management 31,392 39,435 36,362 24,790 27,682 29,458 6.6% Distribution & Transportation 31,111 30,187 29,611 28,071 25,230 24,248 28.3% Finance, L,~surance, Real Estate 30,094 31,079 31,446 29,781 29,095 32,624 -7.8% Construction 27,869 28,486 24,770 25,412 23,645 22,544 23.6% Government & Education & Utilities 27,624 27,474 27,875 28,659 28,447 28,824 -4.2% Health Seroices 23,113 21,739 21,145 20,162 19,333 19,220 20.3% Business Services 19,299 16,979 16,373 15,532 18,902 24,046 -19.7% Other Services & Help Agencies 17,757 15,616 12,984 15,105 14,682 15,335 15.8% Agriculture 17,652 17,338 15,159 14,578 15,310 13,764 28.2% Retail Trade 15,801 15,088 13,791 13,172 13,542 14,555 8.6% Hotel&Amusement 11,819 10,439 10,193 10,919 11,272 8,858 33.4% TOTAl, $25,125 $24,992 $23,093 $22,383 $22,687 $22,480 11.8% SOLTECE: CA Employment Development Department-' Average Pay Per Sector, 1991-1996 ... In 1996, Temecula's best paying sectors were Manufacturing ($34,710), Engineering & Management ($31,392) and Distribution & Transportation ($31,111). The greatest 1991-1996 growth in average pay was 33.4% in the low paying Hotel & Amusement sector, followed by 28.2% in Agriculture. Temecula is umque in having Manufacturing workers average well over $30,000 and Distribution & Trans- potration also above that amount. In other Inland Empire cities, their average pay is in the $28,000-$29,000 range. In the mid-range, average pay in Construction ($27.869) roughly equaled that in Government, Education & Utilities ($27,624), and exceeded Health Services at (23,113). Public and utility sector pay fell 4.2% since 1991. · Temecula's lowest 1996 average pay was in the Hotel & Amusement industry ($11,819), Retail Trade ($15,801), Agriculture ($17,652) and Other Services and Employment & Help Agencies ($17, 757). $344.710 1 : $31¢11 $30~094 $31~392 · Mfg EnglMgt Dist Exhibit 56.-Average Pay Per Worker By Sector City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1996 $28jlla ..........J~ ........... $19 i,~99 Fin/RE Const GovlEdu Health B us...Sv ServlHelp Agr Isource: CA Employment Development DepaRment I $15,..~01 I S11j819 Retail Travel { 'iD ol'Tc,nccula k~l~H'IW~, l'~pared b3' &din F- IlusinR, 1'1~.1). PaRe 32 Employment Exhibit 57.-Number of Firms City of lem ecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 89 1,217 1,238 1,533 1,423 1,255 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 ISource: CA Employment Development Department 1996 Number Firms Per Sector, 1991-1996... The number of firms located in Temecula has risen from 1,189 in 1991 to 1,533 in 1996. That is a gain of 344 companies or 28.9%. · Most of the growth in new finns occurred in 1995 and 1996. This marked a time when the Southern Califor- nia recession was ending, and companies were looking for places to expand. · The largest number of city finns are in Retail Trade (279), followed by Construction (222), Other Services & Employment Agencies (194). · The greatest growth rate for new firms has come in Distribution and Transportation (5Z3%), Business Serv- ices (55.1%), and Other Services and Employment Agencies (43.2~ and Manufacturing (42.3~,f). Exhibit 58.-Firms Per Sector City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 Sector 1996 Retail Trade 279 Construction 222 Other Services & Help Supply Agcy 194 Distribution & Transportation 146 Manufacturing 130 Business Services 114 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 113 Agriculture 107 Health Services 101 Engineering & Management 71 Hotel & Amusement 41 Government & Education & Utilities 19 TOTAL 1,533 sOURCE: CA Employment Development Department 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 %91-96 259 234 231 231 223 24.9% 203 177 185 207 204 8.8% 188 164 153 138 136 43.2% 136 118 108 95 93 57.3% 122 113 98 92 91 42.3% 100 85 80 69 74 55.1% 106 81 87 93 93 21.6% 95 91 90 87 84 28.1% 101 89 94 90 83 21.7% 66 57 67 70 69 2.9% 34 33 29 29 29 39.7% 17 16 19 19 14 37.0% 1,423 1,255 1,238 1,217 1,189 28.9% ('it).' of 'l'emecula I}'l~ttl~, Prypared b)' ,lohll F_ Ilusin~, I'h.l). Page 33 Employment Exhibit 59.-Growth In Number of Firms By Sector City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1996 56 53 41 39 24 2O 18 18 12 Sew/Help Retail Did Bus_Sv Mfg Agr Fin/RE Con~l Health Travel ISource: CA Employmenl [)evelopmenl Depaltment~ 2 Gov/Edu Eng/Mgt Every sector of Temecula's economy has added firms since 1991, led by Other Service & Employment Agencies with 59 new firms, Retail Trade with 56, and Distribution & Transportation with 53. Note that the 133 of Temecula's 344 new ftrms are in Distribution & Transportation, Business Services and Manufac- turing These sectors largely sell services and products outside of the Inland Empire. This is a good sign as they bring fresh dollars to the commumty and expand its economic base. Though Temecula has specialized in terms of Manufactttrmg employment and payroll, it has not truly specialized in any sector, in terms of the number of fins. The largest concentrate is the 222 compames in Retailing. They represent just 18.2% of city firms. Construction, is next at 14.4%. IdTlm;l[I;t~]l:3111;'l"qt[,], of Firms City of Temecula, First ~Months, 1996 (36.8%) Other (18,2%) Retail 04.4%) Const (8.4%) Mfg (9.5%) Dist (12.7%) SeN/Help ISource: CA Employment De~lopment DepamnentI it3.' of lemecula ~' Jolm E. flusinR, l'h.]). Pa~e 34 Employment Exhibit 61.-Average Size of Firms City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 11.9 13.2 14.2 12.7 12.9 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Isour,.: cA Employment Development DepaAment I · Temecula's economy is largely made up of smaller finns. The average number of workers per firm grew from 11.4 in 1991 to a high eft 14.2 in 1994. It has since stabilized at just under 13 workers per finn. · Only one sector of Temecula's economy averaged over 100 workers: Govenunent & Education (103.4) · The balance of the city's economy was composed of smaller firms led by Manufacturing at 42.1 workers, Ho- tel & Amusement at 21.3, Retail Trade at 15.7 and Agriculture at 11.2. · The balance of the economy is composed of firms with less than 10 employees. Exhibit 62.-Average Number Workers Per Firm City. of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 Sector 1996 Government & Education & Utilities: 103.4 Manufacturing 42.1 Hotel & Amusement/c 21.3 Retail Trade 15.7 Agriculture 11.2 Distribution & Transportation 9.9 Business Services 6.8 Health Services 5.6 Engineering & Management 5.6 Other Services & Help Supply Agcy 5.4 Construction 5.2 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 5.1 TOTAL 12.9 SOURCE: CA Employment Development Department 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 °A,91-96 107.0 110.3 80.2 75.2 90.9 13.7% 43.3 45.4 48.7 39.4 35.3 19.5% 12.9 14.3 14.7 10.2 8.8 142.3% 16.2 17.5 15.2 13.9 12.9 22.1% 10.1 12.2 12.5 11.3 13.0 -14.1% 8.9 8.5 9.1 10.9 8.7 14.6% 7.3 6.9 6.5 5.0 5.0 37.1% 5.9 5.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 24.7% 5,0 6.4 10.9 10.1 11.3 -50.8% 5.9 7.7 6.1 6.0 4.6 19.0% 4.3 5.1 4.9 5.7 7.2 -28.3% 5.4 8.4 6.6 5.8 6.0 -15.3% 12,7 14.2 13.2 11.9 11.4 12.6% { 1D' of Temccula l'wpan, d by ,Jolm E. Ilusin~, PILl). Page 35 Employment Exhibit 63.-Employment & Payroll Summary, First Six Months City of Tcmccula, 1991-1996 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 Wage & salary. emplo.vment 19,714 18,056 17,768 16,366 14,505 13,590 Wage & salary. income $495,128,326 $450,900,788 $410,173,198 $366,277,734 $328,949,928 $305,490,688 Average pay level (annualized) $25,115 $24,972 $23,085 $22,381 $22,678 $22,480 Number of firms 1,533 1,423 1,255 1,238 1,217 1,189 Workers per firm 12.9 12.7 14.2 13.2 11.9 11.4 In comparing the 1991-1995 first six months employment data for Temecula, to the full year data, there is no significance. · The use of first half data, to allow inclusion of the available information on 1996, is thus probably reflective of trends through 1996. Exhibit 64.-Employment & Payroll Summary, Annual Wage & salary employment Wage & salary income Average pay level (annualized) Number of firms Workers per firm City of Temecula, 1991-1995 1996 1995 1994 18,616 17,910 $463,483,529 $416,328,128 $24,896 $23,246 1,470 1,280 12.7 14.0 1993 1992 1991 16,712 14,756 14,025 $377,272,737 $330,472,945 $310,874,082 $22,575 $22,396 $22,165 1,251 1,229 1,197 13.4 12.0 11.7 Ui~.' of 'l'emccula l'~rpa~rd by Jolm E. Ilusin~, l'b-i). Pa~oe 36 CITY OF TEMECULA MARKETING PLAN FY1997-98 ATTACttMENT C INTRODUCTION DRAFT To a large extent, the 1997-1998 Marketing Plan for The City of Temecula reaffirms the goals the marketing committee made last year to accelerate business development activities and services, to gain a larger share of the tourism industry, and to provide effective umbrella communication services to the City. With this in mind, this plan is more of a continuation of the first plan. The plan is sound and practicai, the next step is not to keep planning the work but work the plan. The programs outlined herein are a function of work generated and cash flow. Constant monitoring of them factors, together with periodic evaluation of marketing effectiveness, will allow for all these programs to be completed effectively. The key element determining the successful implementation of the marketing plan is not the plan itself but the people involved in executing it. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS The City of Temecula has emerged as one of the fastest growing regions in Southern California and ranked as "The #1 Most Livable City in Riverside County". Temecula's dramatic population growth between 1980 to present suggests that the quality of life is high, and that the city will continue to grow in its appeal as the area is promoted to all of its markets. Temecula offers a variety of community features-- affordable housing, scenic location, award winning schools, low crime rate, numerous neighborhood and community parks and recreational facilities -- that shows evidence of the city's commitment to maintaining a quality living environment. Temecula also offers a desirable business climate to attract new businesses to its area -- low land cost, highly skilled labor force, business assistance programs, and quality of life offered to its employees. The City has a host of appealing events and attractions, and together with its mildly seasonal climate, good air quality year round, and its convenient location, create an inviting destination that can position Temecula as an inviting tourist destination. A number of outdoor activities including championship golf courses, hot air ballooning, hiking, camping, and boating and fishing at Lake Skinner provide recreational opportunities for all age groups. For entertainment, residents and visitors enjoy antiquing in Old Town along with wine- tasting and tours offered at 12 popular wineries. The area's attributes and tourism-friendly environment coupled with a strong publicity campaign will boost awareness of the city, and enhance its economic development. As the City's marketing program was developed to include both business development and tourism, we must keep in mind that each division plays an important role which effects the other. The program has a strong emphasis on tourism promotion which not only is instrumental in establishing Temecula as a tourism destination but also positions Temecula as a place to establish a business. The tourism campaign is used as a "hook" to attract business development to the area by bringing the conception that Temecula has more to offer than just a nice place to visit. Thus, it is imperative that Temecula continues to move forward with implementing its marketing program in attracting select businesses and visitors to the city. 2 o GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Increase the Number of Businesses Locating and Expanding in Temecula Accelerate business development activities and services. A. Position the City as an ideal location for businesses to locate and expand in Temecula. B. Position Temecula as "business friendly". C. Communicate the many business success stories in Temecula. D. Continue to serve existing businesses and keep abreast of their expansion plans. Increase the Number of Tourists Visiting Temecula Gain a larger share of the tourism industry. A. Increase the number of weekday overnight visitors. B. Increase the number of weekend and weekday non-overnight visitors. C. Increase the number of weekend overnight visitors. D. Increase awareness ofTemecula Valley's features as a tourist destination. E. Continue the response program to consumer inquiries about Temecula. F. Increase attendance at all Temecula events. Provide Umbrella Communication Services to the City of Temecula Effective communication is critical in executing the marketing plan. A. Continue coordinated communication efforts of the City's marketing committee consisting of the EDC, Chamber of Commerce, Vintner's Association, OTTMA, County of Riverside, Temecula Valley Film Council, Inland Empire Economic Partnership/Inland Empire Tourism Council, Special Events Representative and the City, to communicate a single, unified message. B. Continue coordinated communication efforts with the local commercial brokerage community and lodging industry. C. Continue to provide general communication advice and counsel to the City of Temecula as required. 3 TARGET AUDIENCES Economic Development A. Specific Clean Industries Small to mid-size companies located in: High-tech manufacturing and communication services Paper and plastics industry Health related manufacturing services Vineyards/Vintners B. Real Estate Industry Business relocation consultants specialists California commercial brokers Lenders and financial community C. Business Owners and Decision Makers Throughout California and the West Emphasis on Southern California (Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange Counties) D. Business Executives and Decision-Makers Who Visit Temecula Overnight visitors Golf course patrons Winery visitors Special event attendees E. Temecula Residents and Businesses 4 TARGET AUDIENCES Tourism A. Adults (ages 25-55) Middle to upper income Singles and couples Within driving distance B. Vacationers (Couples and Families) Vacationers planning a trip to Southern California Vacationers already in San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles Counties C. Select Affinity Groups Tour groups Motor coach tours Cruise Lines through San Diego Convention groups (spouse/companion activities) Association business groups (corporate recognition - i.e. president's clubs) D. Young Adults (ages 18-25) Active recreation seekers Potential patrons of Temecula dining and entertainment establishments E. Active Mature Adults (ages 55+) Middle to upper income Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange Counties Singles, couples and groups DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING CAMPAIGN I. Outreach Materials Design and produce various outreach materials that will assist in the development of awareness and exposure for Temecula among business executives. The focus will include business and media outreach. A. Business Development Kit 1. Reprint folder kit Expenses: $5,000 Lead Organization: City B. City of Temecula Demographic Book Update demographic information. Develop and print slick demographic booklet compatible in design to the business folder kit. The demographic book will be distributed at trade shows as well as included in the City's business brochure. Expenses: $5,000 Lead Organization: City C. Business Testimonial Piece Marketing piece on testimonials from businesses relocating and expanding in Temecula . This will be used as a direct mail piece, included in the business development kit and distributed at trade shows. Expenses: $2,500 Lead Organization: City D. Direct Mail Literature Design and develop a direct mail piece targeted to businesses in San Fernando Valley, 1-10 & 1-15 corridor, and the City's existing business data base. Expenses: $5,000 Lead Organization: City 6 E. CD Rom Unique marketing tool utilized for business and tourism attraction. Information includes City demographics, tourism entities and special events. Update existing City CD Rom. Reorder CD Rom for business development program. Expenses: $2,500 Lead Organization: City F. Photography Library Prepare top quality marketing photography for promoting business development and tourism marketing collateral and for use in marketing efforts. Hire professional photographers. Photo materials - prints, slides, transparencies, etc. Expenses: $4,000 Lead Organization: City H. Selected Industry Outreach The marketing committee has agreed on targeting small to mid-size companies within the following industries to target: High-tech Manufacturing and Communication Services, Paper, Plastics, Health Related Manufacturing Services, and Vineyards/ Vintners. These successful "clean" industries as well as vineyards have an established presence within the City and have the greatest potential to grow. A. Review EDC Research on Individual Temecula Companies Update prospective business database. Maintain list of prospective businesses and monitor follow-up. Establish a tracking system. Expenses: -0- Lead Organization: City B. Research Specific Industry Communication Tactics Continue to investigate and join associations. Update industry trade media list. Expenses: -0- Lead Organization: City Develop and Implement Tactics for Each Industry Media outreach, association outreach and trade show participation. Attend 3 trade shows in partnership with California Trade & Commerce and Inland Empire Economic Partnership. Expenses: $3,000 Lead Organization: City Retention Committee for Community Businesses 1. Sustain and nurture existing businesses in Temecula. 2. Establish a business retention program to focus on the top 20 companies in the area. Expenses: -0- Lead Organizations: EDC, Chamber, City Reception Committee For Businesses Structure a reception committee for businesses that have relocated to the area. Mail relocation packet and other pertinent material on Temecula as a business plans its move. Once a business has made a commitment to the area, the committee will personally visit the new businesses welcoming them to the area. Expenses: -O- Lead Organization: Chamber Fe Site Selectors Industrial Tour The industrial tour is a unique opportunity for the City of Temecula to promote the City's growing business climate to a select group of site selectors. Identify a select group of site selectors and invite them for an industrial tour including golf, wine tour, meals and lodging. Establish a program for the tour. Provide information on Temecula's business climate and unique opportunities. Expenses: $1,000 Lead Organization: City 8 G. Business Outreach Through Golf/Lodging Industry 2. 3. 4. Meet with local golf/lodging representatives. Follow-up with key business and business executives staying at local hotels and golf resorts. Provide a gift basket and business relocation information to the qualified contact for each visiting business group. Continue follow-up with the company through our direct mail program and personal follow-up. Expenses: $500 Lead Organization: City "The Right Fit" Direct Mail Program Direct mail campaign targeted to executives and businesses along 1-10 corridor, Manufacturer's Council member list and City's master business economic database. An invitation is extended for a free game of golf and a tour of Zevo Golf's facilities. Respondents only will receive a complimentary shirt. Polo shirts will also be available for purchase at the Chamber. 2. 3. 4. Mail out the "Right Fit" direct mail piece. Plan activities for businesses that respond to the direct mail piece. Activities include: golf, lunch and tour of Zevo Golf's facilities. A complementary Temecula polo shirt will be sent to those receiving the invitation who respond. Provide information on the business opportunities Temecula offers. Temecula Polo Shirts Expenses: $9,900 Lead Organization: City Direct Mail Program Expenses: $1,000 Lead Organization: City Regional Business Media Outreach Through opportunities created by tourism and successful business development efforts, there will be opportunities to bring a greater awareness of Temecula to business owners through the general business press. A. Press Materials Write background release, fact sheet, EDC release. Determine "City approved" media materials. Expenses: -0- Lead Organization: City B. Establish Working News Bureau Respond to media inquiries and requests for information. Continue to respond to editorial placement opportunities such as special supplements in the regional Business Journals. Update and maintain database of influential business media. Generate articles regarding business development news in regional press. Publicize individual company success stories to general media in region (four per year). Reprints of articles for business press kits and direct mail pieces. Expenses: $3,000 Lead Organization(s): City IV. Real Estate Outreach A key audience for the City's business development efforts are commercial brokers, business relocation consultants and builders. These key publics assist business decision- makers with relocation needs and should have a strong and favorable opinion of the City of Temecula. A. Outreach to Commercial Brokers, Builders and Lenders o Update list of influential brokers for EDC database. Produce 1 page real estate audience newsletter including news and information about new sites, local business relocations and expansions, land availability and land costs in Temecula. Distribute to real estate database semi-annually. Local commercial broker marketing ideas meetings - three meetings per year. Expenses: $2,000 Lead Organization: City B. Outreach to Business Relocation Consultants Update list from IEEP, business publications and business lists. Add to business development database. 10 Write editorial for trade magazines. Evaluate selected advertising. Expenses: -0- Lead Organization: City V. Selected Advertising Research and recommend targeted advertising opportunities to reach the business community. All advertising will maintain a consistent and strong message on economic development for Temecula. A. Develop Print Ad Produce one industry-specific ad. Reprints of published print ads and editorials for press kits and direct mailings. Expenses: $3,000 Lead Organization: City B. Identify Advertising Venues and Buy Media Pursue media co-operative advertising buys with other area businesses, developers and organizations to stretch Temecula's advertising budget. Place ads in relocation business supplements in San Diego, Orange, San Gabriel and San Fernando and Los Angeles County Business Journals. Place an ad in one specific industry trade magazine. Research various radio advertising means. Consider co-op advertising with the County of Riverside EDA and Inland Empire Economic Partnership. Expenses: $15,000 Lead Organization: City VI. Community Relations In order to stay "business friendly", the economic development program of the City as well as its marketing campaign, must be communicated clearly and positively to the businesses and citizens of Temecula. Their acceptance and buy-in will make both internal and external efforts easier to implement successfully. Schedule City Speaking Opportunities and Other Presentations to Professional Organizations 1. Develop briefing presentation on the importance of economic development, 11 tourism outreach and the marketing campaign. Schedule presentations to Chamber of Commerce, Rotary Club, OTTMA, brokers, and professional organizations. Expenses: -0- Lead Organization: City B. Continue To Schedule Media Roundtables Invite local media representatives to media roundtables that feature the marketing committee and other local business leaders discussing marketing efforts for tourism and business development activities. Expenses: -0- Lead Organization: City VII. Real Estate Facilitator Outreach in Orange and Los Angeles Counties A planned event to reach out directly to select individuals in the real estate industry in Orange and Los Angeles Counties. The event will also provide an opportunity to generate substantial media awareness of our economic development efforts. Expenses: $2,500 Lead Organization: City VIII. Marketing Meetings (Business Development and Tourism) Bi-monthly marketing meetings scheduled with key tourism and business development representatives including the City, EDC, Chamber, OTTMA, Vintners Association, Local Special Events Representative, Inland Empire Tourism Council, Inland Empire Economic Partnership, Film Council and County of Riverside to share individual activities, network and strategize. 12 TOURISM MARKETING CAMPAIGN DRAFT Outreach Materials An important part of the marketing campaign is an aggressive outreach to travel media, travel industry writers and travel industry professionals. Outreach will focus on establishing awareness with the travel industry along with establishing Temecula as a desirable destination for travel. Press Kit - Press kits to be used for information materials during familiarization tours, as handout to media at specific events and as part of an on-going public relations direct mail program. Update press releases and background features. Secure and duplicate photos and maps. Follow-up with all media who receive the kit, by phone or through written communication. Assemble press kits and distribute to tourism industry. Expenses: $2,500 Lead Organization: City B. Tourism Brochure Reprint tourism brochure. Distribute brochure through rack service in San Diego and Orange Counties. Additional distribution includes special events and businesses in Temecula and the brochure is included in press kits and business brochures. Expenses: $9,900 Lead Organization: City Media Relations Extensive media relations will continue to be an important outreach to achieve our goals of generating overnight visits and development of attendance for all Temecula events. Mailings and direct contact with regional consumer and travel media are included. A. Update and Maintain Media Lists Continue to update and maintain a comprehensive media contact list that includes editors, publishers and/or writers from leading travel, lifestyle and business publications and newspapers. 13 Update and maintain list of contacts of California Visitors and Convention Bureaus, convention and meeting planners, travel agents, and tour/motor coach operators. Expenses: $1,500 Lead Organization: City Monthly Event Publicity 2. 3. 4. Research and write monthly event release, spotlighting a specific event. Research and write monthly calendar of events. Update monthly the long lead calendar of events. Press releases regarding people, places and amenities that make Temecula such a unique and desirable community (i.e. hiking in Santa Rosa Plateau, hot air ballooning). Distribute and follow-up with appropriate media. Expenses: $4,000 Lead Organization: City Respond to Media Inquiries Respond to phone calls and written inquiries from media regarding tourism and special events. Follow-up with key media to assure coverage of events and receipts of materials. Expenses: $1,500 Lead Organization: City Travel Media Outreach Update list of key regional and national travel publications and writers. Distribute press kit with pitch letter. Research and write article on topics including golf vacations, romantic getaways and jazz weekends. Expenses: $2,500 Lead Organization: City Tourist Guidebook Outreach Guide books tourists use in planning their itineraries in Southern California. 1. Identify appropriate guide books including those issued by the State of 14 California, Automobile Clubs, Commercial Publishers and In-Hotel Room Publications. Write and distribute copy about various Temecula attractions, events, activities and it's history. Expenses: $500 Lead Organization: City Tourism Industry Newsletter A two-color newsletter targeted to regional, national and international travel and tour operators. Write and produce a six panel tourism industry newsletter twice a year. Develop industry database and mail. Expenses: $6,000 Lead Organization: City Long-lead Event Calendar Research upcoming events. Produce long-lead calendar. Mail calendar every six months to long-lead consumer and tourism trade media and designated media planners. Expenses: $1,000 Lead Organization: City Media Familiarization Tours 2. 3. 4. 5. Develop media list for invitation to a fam tour in Temecula and mail. Establish itinerary, lodging and transportation. Work with local hotels, restaurants and wineries for sponsorships. Plan media days for special events. Partner with Inland Empire Tourism Council on hosting media faro tours. Expenses: $3,000 Lead Organization: City Cable/Public Access Identify and exploit all regional and cable opportunities for exposure regarding Temecula tourism. 15 Send calendar of special events monthly. Coordinate spokespersons for cable programs when opportunities arise. Utilize all means available to secure a commitment from a major regional television program to have the show broadcast for a limited time period from Temecula. Expenses: 0 Lead Organization: City J. Visitors Guide Update and reprint the 1997 visitor guide that represents all the tourism aspects of Temecula. Expenses: -O- Lead Organization: Chamber lIl. Travel Industry Outreach An outreach campaign will be conducted to the travel industry, primarily focusing on industry segments as: convention and meeting planners, travel agents, tour associations, and bus/motor coach operations. Efforts will be made to partner with San Diego, Los Angeles, and Orange County entities when possible. A. Industry Mailings Identify lists of specific industry individuals and media. Prepare material and distribute. Follow-up. Expenses: $1,500 Lead Organization: City B. Trade Show Participation Participate in one tourism trade show (tour association meeting and group tour planners, consumer tourism). Coordinate City involvement and logistics. Expenses: $3,000 Lead Organization: Chamber IV. Selected Advertising Research and recommend targeted advertising opportunities to reach the tourism industry. 16 Vo VI. All advertising will maintain a consistent and strong message on tourism for Temecula. A. Develop Print Ad 1. Work with designer to develop one tourism-specific ad. 2. Reprints of' print ads for press kits and direct mailings. Expenses: $2,000 Lead Organization: City B. Identify Advertising Venues and Buy Media Pursue media co-operative advertising buys with other area organizations stretch Temecula's advertising budget. 1. Place ads in up to three tourism industry trade publications. Expenses: $15,000 Lead Organization: City Marketing Workshops tO These workshops will consist of public relations and advertising workshops for Temecula small businesses and merchants to use in furthering their individual marketing efforts. City of Temecula Marketing Workshops 1. Small Business Development Coordinate subject matter with Chamber and OTTMA. Develop overheads and handouts for group. Lead interactive workshops. Expenses: -0- Lead Organization: Chamber Integrated Marketing Tactics A strong effort will be made to reach business decision-makers who are visiting Temecula as tourists to bring awareness of business opportunities in the area. The projects listed can greatly enhance the synergy of both economic development and tourism marketing activities. A. Reprint table tents with economic development message points to be displayed 17 VII. VIII. on tables of local restaurants, hotel rooms and local business conference rooms. B. Tag tourism advertisements with economic development messages. C. Promote economic development at all Temecula special events. Expenses: $1,500 Lead Organization: City Sponsored Items A. Tourism Site on World Wide Web Update material and add to existing site. Maintain a linkage of all Temecula Internet sites and produce additional sites where warranted. Establish a tracking system to be put in place on the sites to properly measure interest (hits). Expenses: -0- Lead Organizations: EDC and Chamber Services A. Rack Service Rack service distribution throughout San Diego and Orange Counties. Expenses: $7,000 Lead Organization: City 18 BUDGET SUMMARY BUSENESS DEVEI,OPMENT Tactic Eee$ Economic Development: Outreach Materials 1-A Business Development Kit 1-B Demographic Book 1-C Business Testimonial Piece 1-D Direct Mail Literature 1-E CD Rom 1-F Photography Library -0- Selected Industry Outreach 2-A Research on Temecula Companies 2-B Research Specific Industry 2-C Trade Show Participation 2-D Retention Committee 2-E Reception Committee 2-F Site Selectors Industrial Tour 2-G Business Outreach 2-H "The Right Fit" Direct Mail Program/ Polo Shirts -0- Regional Business Media Outreach 3-A Press Materials 3-B Maintain Public Relations Program -0- Real Estate Outreach 4-A Outreach to Commercial Brokers, Builders and Lenders 4-B Outreach to Business Relocation Consultants -0- Selected Advertising 5-A Print Ads 5-B Advertising -0- Community Relations Real Estate Facilitator Outreach Expen. $ 5,000 $ 5,0O0 $ 2,500 $ 5,OOO $ 2,5OO $ 4,000 -0- 3,0OO 1,000 500 1,000 9,900 -0- $ 3,000 $ 2,000 $ 3,000 $15,000 o0- $ 2,500 DRAFT Organ. City City City City City/EDC City City City City/EDC EDC Chamber City City City City City City City City City City City City tOTALS -0- $64,900 19 BUDGET SUMMARY TOURISM T~ctic Tourism: Outreach Materials 1-A Press Kit 1-B Tourism Brochure Media Relations 2-A Media Lists 2-B Monthly Publicity 2-C Media Response 2-D Travel Media Outreach 2-E Tourist Guidebook 2-F Tourism Industry Newsletter 2-G Long-leadEvent Calendar 2-H Fam Tours 2-I Cable/Public Access 2-J Visitors Guide Travel Outreach 3-A Mailings 3-B Trade Show Participation Selected Advertising 4-A Print Ads 4-B Advertising Marketing Workshops Marketing Tactics Sponsored Items Rack Services in San Diego and Orange Counties TOTALS DRAFT Fees Expen. Organ. -0- $ 2,500 City $ 9,900 City -0- $1,500 City -0- $ 4,000 City -0- $1,500 City -0- $ 2,500 City -0- $ 500 City -0- $ 6,000 City -0- $1,000 Chamber -0- $ 3,000 City -0- $ -0- City -0- -0- Chamber -0- $1,500 City -0- $ 3,000 Chamber -0- $ 2,000 City -0- $15,000 City -0- -0- Chamber -0- $ 1,500 City -0- -0- EDC/Chamber -0- $ 7,000 City -0- $62,400 TOTAL MARKETING BUDGET -0- $127,300 20 FU-ND]~TG REQUEST ATTAC~E~T D 27450 YBez Rd., Suite 104 Temecmla, CA 92591 PhoBe (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-020! March 31, 1997 Mayor Pat Birdsall City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Mayor Birdsall: Enclosed please find our 1996/97 budget, a current financial statement as of February 28, 1997, a September 30, 1996 Fiscal Year-end financial statement, and a recap of"Services Provided to the City". We appreciate the City's past support and recognition of the Chamber's valuable contributions to our city. The City's increased contract in 1996 from $45,000 to $80,000 proved beneficial in our ability to provide even more quality services. As we continue to experience growth, the Chamber will continue to provide unmatched service to visitors, potential residents, and potential businesses. The Chamber's aggressive fund-raising efforts make it possible to provide services to the city at a fraction of the cost. The total value of services provided is $340,680 and we are requesting just 33%. The City's $112,425 will ensure the Chamber's goal; to provide the best possible services! We look forward to meeting with you to discuss further the oppommities of our continued joint efforts. Sincerely, Terry Gilmore President CC: City Council Members Ron Bradley, City Manager Mary Jane McLamey, Assistant City Manager 27450 Ynez Rd., Shire 104 Temecnla, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5000 · Fax (909) 694-0201 Value of Services Provided to the City Total % Tourism 177,380 52% Visitor Guides Satellite Visitor Centers (9) Postage/Faxes/Printed materials Internet-Tourist Information Visitor Outreach Long Lead Event Calendar Trade Show Participation Tourism Industry Newsletter Marketing Committee Participation 65,000 74,880 15,000 7,500 7,500 4,000 1,000 5OO 1,000 Community Information 89,000 26% Pictorial Walk-in/Telephone Traffic Maps Relocation Packets Demographic Information Special Events Calendar of Events Internet - Relocation/Calendar/Schools 30,000 30,000 10,000 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 Cit~ Promotions 44,800 13% Shop Temecula First Campaigns (2) Business of the Month Program Business Showcases Mystery Shopper Campaign Holiday Lights/4th of July Float Internet - Local Businesses Marketing Seminars (Customer Service) State of the City luncheon CD Rom 28,000 4,800 2,000 2,000 1,000 3,000 2,000 1,500 500 Education/Government 23,000 7% Registry Scholarships Student of the Month School Promotions Brochure Issue Awareness 4,000 4,000 4,000 6,000 5,000 Economic Develo, ment Marketing Campaign 6,500 2% Provide support to existing Temecula business Schedule City Speaking Opportunities Welcoming Committee (Ribbon Cuttings) Follow up on Company Leads 1,500 1,000 1,500 2,500 GRAND TOTAL 340,680 0 Services Provided to the City (Detailed) TOURISM The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Tourism Committee is comprised of volunteers from tourist related entities in the community such as the wineries, Old Town, Nature Couservancy, hotels, and restaurants. The committee continues to strive to promote the tourism industry in Temecula. Visitor Guides - An updated guide is currently available in several local businesses that have high tourist traffic, the satellite visitor centers, and at all local major events. In addition, the Chamber mails the guide to any individual requesting tourist information. Satellite Visitor Centers - Due to the success of the original two centers, the Chamber now manages a total of nine centers to ensure easy access to visitors exiting either Rancho California Road or Winchester Road from the 1-15. The centers provide weekend visitors with a visitor guide, demographics and/or relocation information. Postage/Printed materials - As a result of the city's marketing efforts there has been an obvious increase in postage and printing of materials such as housing tracts, schools, realtors, demographics, employment opportunities, apartment rentals, and other specific requests. Internet - Tourist Information - Information on all tourist aspects of the city are available worldwide. The website address is WWW.TEMECULA.ORG Visitor Oulxeach - The Tourism Committee's "goodie bag" concept has proven to be a big hit with groups corning into Temecula for sports related activities or tour groups. The bags are full of information and goodies from Temecula. The goal is to ensure that these individuals are aware of ALL the tourist aspects of Temecula so that they will return in the future. This projects also helps promote local business. 1 .ong l.ead g. vent Calendar - The Chamber provides the City's Marketing Department with calendar information on a regular basis. This information is used to promote upcoming events. Trade Show Participation - Chamber staff is available on an "as-needed" basis to help at various trade shows. Tourism Industry Newsletter - Chamber staff is available to assist with conceptual ideas for the newsletter. Marketing Committee Participation - Chamber staff actively participates in the Marketing Committee and attends monthly meetings held at the City. COMMUNITY INFORMATION Pictorial - An updated pictorial is scheduled for 1997! This comprehensive guide provides a profile of business and industry, medical and health services, lifestyle and real estate, education, transportation, shopping, arts and culture, recreation, and city and county resources. Walk-in/Telephone Traffic - The Chamber is dedicated to providing quality, professional service. See attached Activity Reports. Maps - An updated map is available at the Chamber and all Satellite Visitor Centers. Relocation Packets - The relocation packet has proved to be a valuable asset to anyone interested in moving to Temecula. It is used by many local manufacturers to assist their employees that are relocating to the area. It includes information on schools, utilities, city and government offices, law enforcement, hospitals, climate, and a commnnity profile. Demographic Information - The Chamber assembles, customizes, and dislxibutes current information including census, commumty growth figures, demographic studies, and an economic profile from Riverside County, the State of California and the Economic Development Corporation. Special Events - The Chamber "makes it their business" to provide details on all special events to interested callers. Instead of referring the caller to make another call to obtain the information, Chamber staff will provide the caller with as much information as possible. This is especially important for events such as Balloon & Wine, Rod Run, Taste of the Valley, Arts Festival and Tractor Races. Calendar of Events - Staff interacts with all groups and organizations to keep a current community calendar for all events planned in the community. Citizens and visitors have come to depend on the Chamber's Calendar of Events; the only comprehensive monthly listing of events citywide. Intemet (Relocation/Calendar/Schools - All printed information distributed is now available on the internet. CITY PROMOTIONS Shop Temecula Fixst Campaign - Due to the success of the 1995 and 1996 campaigns, the Local Business Promotions Committee is coordinating two campaigns in 1997. The campaign promotes shopping locally and gives residents awareness of the availability of products and services in our own community while keeping tax dollars in the community. Business of the Month Program - The Local Business Promotions Committee started a new recognition program in 1997 which will provide visibility to businesses that go "over and above" for the community. Business Showcases - Local businesses have the opportunity to introduce theix products and services to the commumty. Mystery Shopper Campaign - Each month, the Local Business Promotions Committee sends out Mystery Shoppers to local businesses. The business with the highest points wins the Mystery Shopper award. This provides awareness to the community as well as to the businesses. Holiday/4* of July Float - Floats are decorated and displayed to encourage folks to shop locally. Internet - Local Businesses - An entire list of Chamber Members (over 900) is available worldwide through the internet. Marketing Seminars - These seminars are free to local business owners and managers and focus on providing them with tips on Customer Service. State of the City Luncheon - A luncheon is coordinated to provide the Mayor of Temecula an opportunity to showcase the City's plans for the year. CD Rom - The Chamber advertised on the City's CD Rom and will participate in promoting the sales of this product. EDUCATION-GOVE. RNM'E. NTAI, Registry. - The Chamber's Education Committee started the registry program in 1995. The registry is a valuable resource to educators and students. It provides information on businesses that have committed to participate in various programs such as Career Days, Job Shadowing, Job Exposure, Mentorship Programs, Speakers and Material Contributions. Scholarshil>s - The Chamber awards four scholarships to graduating high school students each year. Student of the Month - This program recognizes two students from each of the thxee local high schools each month. School Promotions Brochure - The Education Committee presented a new brochure featuring all of Temecula's schools. This full-color glossy brochure is distributed thxough the Chamber office, Satellite Visitor Centers and the City of Temecula. Issue Awareness - Issues relating to business are reviewed by the Governmental Action Committee and when necessary a position is taken. The committees positions are published m local newspapers as well as in the monthly newsletter. ECONOMIC DEVF, I,OPMF. NT MARICF, TING CAMPAIGN Support of Existing Temecula Businesses - Chamber staff is available to make courtesy calls to existing businesses to ensure their needs are being met. City Speaking Opportunities - Speaking oppormrdties are scheduled at various groups when there is a need to provide "quick" information throughout the commtmity. A good example of this is the Measure C Campaign. Welcoming Committee = The Chamber schedules ribbon cuttings for new businesses. Follow up on Comoany Leads - Chamber staff follows-up on all company leads. CITY CONTRA CT HISTOR Y Services Provided City Contract % of Services Paid by City 1993 $ 65,000 $45,000 69% 1994 $103,100 $45,000 44% 1995 $122,400 $45,000 37% 1996 1996 $303,740 $100,234 $ 8O,OOO 33% (requested) 26.4% (received) 1997 $340,680 $112,425 33% oo '0 oo °°888 88 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 88 88888888 8 8 0o 00008 88 88 8 °° 8 8 8 88 88 88°°°800 oo oo ooo oo oooo ............... 6J ,,.:,6,a6,~ 6~ oo o oo o o o oo oo oo6o&~66 o~n r- o u, o~- o o o in in o oo oo 00000 o o o o oo o o oooo o ~ ....... 88 08 8 88 o 8 o 08 oo o8o8oooo 8 o 0,. ~8~0~ o 8~ o 8 o o o ~ oo ooooo oo oo oo o o o oo oo oooooooo o o oo ooooo oo oo 8 oo o o o oo oo oooooooo ojo 88 88888 88 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 88 88888888 8 8 88 88888 88 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 88 88888888 8 8 888 888 888 888 oo oooo 00 o o 00 o o o oo oo ooooooo o b ...... 8 oo 08 ................. 8 o 8. 8.8.~ J~ ,~ o ,,, o o oo o oo oo ooooooo ~ 0 .... 8~,8~- 8 8 8 o 8 ~ ~ 8 8 ~ oooooo§ 88~8 ooo o88oooo8,- o88~88888~888 . .B . 80 8 .BRB . 8~8888 ~ o 8 ~oo~ 888888888888888888888888 8 888 8 88 8 8888 8 888888'8 8 8 °°8°°°°8 ..... ~. 88888 °° 8 8888888888 8 888 8 88 $ 88~8 ~ 888888 8 8 8 88°0°°88 oooooooooooo~ooooooooooo o oo o o o oo o ooooo o o o oooooooo o ............... oooooo .... 008 o 80 o 8o~8 ~ °°°°°8 ............ ~ ~ooooooooom~o~000000ooO ~ 0oo 0 O0 0 O0 0 O0 OhO ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ooo0oo0oo000000000000000 0 O0 -0 O0 0 0000 0 000000 0 0 0 0000o00o 5 ........................... 8 ........ I oooooo oooooooooooo oo o o - o ...... 8 ............ 8oo88 8 880 8 88 8 88~8 ~ 880888 8 8 8 88888888 ~ ~666&6~66~6~666666666 ~ 6~6 ~ 66 6 66 '6 ' 6~66~6 ~ 6 6 ~6666666 0°°880°08888 8 888 8 80 8 88~8 6666666666~6~4666666666 ~ 666 6 66 6 6~ '6 oooocooooooooooooooooooo o 0oo 0 oo o o000 0 000000 o 0 o 00oo0ooo o o ....... oo~ 8 ~ °°° ~ °° ° ~ °°°°~° ~ ° ° °°8 ..... ~ ooooooooo .... ooooo8oo8~8 8 888 8 oo o 8o~8 ~ 800088 0°8°08°0000000°00o00 8 888 8 8 °°°8 ~ 888888 8 8 8 8°°°°~° oo8OOO oo 8 8 ~ ooo oo oo~ oo~ oo oo oooooooooooo TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BALANCE SHEET SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash in checking - Bank of Commerce Cash - Scholarship fund - GW Cash - Money Market Petty cash Receivable from City of Temecula Prepaid rent TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Office furniture & equipment Less: accumulated depreciation NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT 23,401 118 11,375 200 40,000 2,455 72,633 (39,371) $ 77,549 33,262 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable Payroll taxes payable Accrued payroll Deferred income TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES EQUITY Retained earnings, beginning Net income for period TOTAL EQUITY $ 1,831 (259) 2,098 3,493 $ 57,985 45,662 $ 110,811 $ 7,164 103,647 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $ 110,811 See accountant's compilation report Winifred A. Samstag, Certified Public Accountant Temecula, California c,q N ,q, # ...--it I N II .m.# A oo ',q' II t'~ II II If II N N N 0 II 0 H c) If II II u 0000 o II 0 II r.- N N II II II oo O0 o II 0 ff II II # It II # r~ II ~ H I~ II ~ II II ff N II II II # II c) ff ~ H ~ N II H I! ~ 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ EO~ · ~ ~ ~mO0~ ~ ~ 0 O~o~ ~ ~ ~ Z~~O ~ ~,4 ~'~ v v v A c~ II m II If It ff N II 0000 A 0 l 0 II ~ N wl l N It N # oo o o N o II II H H U II II m'N ,~0 Iw o 0 o Id ,,,d O~ ,4 ,,-4 ul II f-. ff N II II H It H 0000 o 0 II o N ~ N N It U N N fi O0 0 II II N II II H tl II ff f~ "q' N II ff H ff # II m.N 0 N II l II N H N N N m. ll O0 0 0 H ~ H H II II ff # H ~ o~o0o0o0o~0o O0~0ooomoooo 0 II r'.. II ,,..# # # 0 DO~ 0~ m~000 a:) II ~ H ~ N # II ,i,-( fi r-,. N 0 II N l N II ,u'J. II · ~ 0 ,-4'00 0 ~ oo~oooo0o~000o0oo0000~000 r~ N a'~ II ~N o H fi fi I1 m II 0 N 0 N u') fi N II N TEM~CULA VALLEy CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BALANCE SHEET FEBRUAR~ 28, 1997 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash in checking - Bank of Commerce Cash in checking - Fallbrook Nat°l Bank Cash - Scholarship fund - GW Cash - Money Market Petty cash Prepaid rent TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS PROPERTY AND EQUIPKENT Office furniture & equipment Less: accumulated depreciation NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPKENT TOTAL ASSETS CURRENT LIABILITIES Payroll ta~es payable TOTAL CURR~NT LIABILITIES EQUITY R~tained earnings, Net income (loss) LIABILITIES AND EQUITY beginning for period TOTAL EQUITY 725 3,811 3,075 36,629 200 2,717 73,870 (39,371) $ 3,346 $ 103,541 (25,231) $ 47,157 34,499 81,656 $ 3,346 78,310 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $ 81,656 See accountant's comp£1at£on report Wlnifred A. Samstag, Certified Public Accountant Temscul&, California o~ I i"' "" '"J '" i '" -" J J J~J ..,., -.. --,-, .-, ...,o ool "*'~° "" ~' 0,,,I (-4, - .-I C · C, 0 * *C.) * C , ~ m~ .= k C u,..~ O E :J e X O~ O0 E J:l k,-t . . J.t . . . O , ,.cI 14 ~-~ :: ~ o r', I fi o I 'q' ~.1 I i I I I fil I CO 1 I 0 I I '-I I .'11 I ffl I -..I I I C I I -,,I I I 00000000 r400fflmO I 0 I 0 ~ ~lm. I ql. I I ! 0 0 I o) II 0 I I I ¢~11 ~110 I 1 1 I m I ml ~11 o I 0 0 ~ ~°°~°o°o°§°°°~°§~o°~°-°.°~°~°°o°o°i~." I r,,I I I I I I I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FUNDING REQUEST FY98 ATTACHMENTE June 10,1997 Economic Development Corporation [emecu/a l'~//er Honomble City Coundl CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Councilmembers: On behalf of the Board of Directors, the membership and staff of the Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation, I am pleased to present you with this summary report of our activities during the 1996-97 fiscal year. While this past year has been a period of transition and challenge, I am,nonetheless, proud of our accomplishments. During the first six months, we undertook a significant effort to reorganize and stabilize the administration of the TVEDC. We accomplished that; but in doing so our "pure" economic development efforts were reduced by necessity. The charge given to our intedm Executive Director was explicitly to focus more on the reorganization than on conventional economic development. We reasoned that a short time spent on effective organizational redesign would, quite simply, make our economic development efforts significantly better in the long run. In the latter half of the year, our economic development efforts have increased. You will see in our report that, even on a strained budget, the 'i'VEDC consistently represented itself and the Temecula Valley as professional and accommodating to business. New ideas and new strategies continue to emerge. Members are demonstrating a recommitment to our mission. The TVEDC wants to thank the Council for its financial support this past year. We also want to thank City staff for their cooperation, support, and understanding as we navigated some choppy waters. The TVEDC is a group of people who look to the economic future of Temecula, and like what they see. We remain adamant in our belief that successful economic development must spdng from a coalition of all the stakeholders in the community - residents, businesses, government, schools. Our new work program reflects that belief and a commitment to succeed. W'rth the City's continued support we can work to create the kind of durable wealth and promote the Quality of Life that will give Temecula the sustainable economy essential to achieving long term community prosperity. Again, thank you for your long standing support. We are looking forward to demonstrating our continuing improvement. Very/truly yours, .__ Thomas A. Ei~lem Executive Director Enclosure Post Office Box 1388 · Temecula, CA 925934388 · Office 909/695-5130 · FAX 909/69~,-'3126 TEMECULA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SUMMARY OF 1996-97 ACTIVITIES In accordance with the provisions delineated in Section 1 of the agreement between the TVEDC and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, the TVEDC Board of Directors, committees, volunteers and staff undertook the following activities: WORKSHOPS - Three workshops/presentations were held this year. In the Fall, the 'I'VEDC Expediting Committee, in collaboration with the City, hosted an afternoon workshop addressing the City's permitting and regulatory procedures. It was attended by about 30 individuals from the development community. Also in October, the TVEDC hosted an economic development roundtable discussion/open forum as part of a membership luncheon, attended by nearly 60 people. In January, the Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation presented Dr. John Husing discussing the Valley's economic outlook. Over 85 people attended. BUSINESS ATTRACTION ('TRADE SHOWS) - The 'I'VEDC attended the WESCON, NEPCON and MDM trade shows as part of the TeamCalifornia exhibit. 'I-VEDC members and staff attended the Diamond Venture Forum; TVEDC staff participated in the ranking and review of the Forum's participating entrepreneurs. BUSINESS ATTRACTION ('RECRUITMENT AND OUTREACH) - Business recruitment is clearly the most public, the most noticeable, of economic development programs, for it is always measured in tangibles such as new jobs, new businesses, new construction, new taxes and the like. The inherent difficulty in this measurement system is that business growth decisions rarely, if ever, neatly correspond to contract reporting periods. This year's efforts may produce next year's (or the year after that) activity. For 1996-97 the TVEDC can report a host of activities and boast of a healthy economic outlook which can serve as indicators of success. Perhaps the other tangibles can be reported next year. The 'FVEDC's attraction efforts included: 1. Working with the City and the brokerage community to identify geographical targets and industries where Quality of Life would play a key role in the 2. Implementing a new system of broker alerts and inquiry response. Responding via introductory correspondence to over 475 new inquiries from all sources. a. 63 required additional simple follow-up ranging from telephone calls to sending more detailed information. b. 11 inquiries evolved into more extensive responses or bona fide proposals where specific development data was provided. c. 5 remain active - pending as of this date. 4. Additionally, 122 older files were closed/purged as non-responsive. TVEDC staff hosting/conducting five individual prospect tours and luncheons with company representatives. Two of these companies are still considering Temecula in a near future decision process. Staff continues to work with these companies. 6. Visiting the manufacturing plant of one of the prospects seeking a site. This company remains interested in Temecula. 7. Responding to all appropriate California Trade and Commerce and Inland Empire Economic Partnership proposals. 8. Cooperating with any and all agencies on creating economic enhancement programs. MARKETING - A TVEDC representative attended most community marketing meetings. TVEDC representatives offered key suggestions relating to the creation of concise, customized trade show distribution pieces, and developing a San Diego Super Bowl tie-in. A Super Bowl committee has been formed by the City; the distribution pieces will be developed by fall. TVEDC undertook the "Who's Gonna Pay" campaign to enlighten the community on the vital role played by business. TVEDC only issued one newsletter this year, but timed its distribution to support the passage of Measure C. A two-part mailer was distributed discussing the value of both doing business in Temecula and being a member of the 'I'VEDC (Slice of the Pie) RETENTION & VISITATION - Business retention activities are critical to successful economic development programs. This past year, working from available data, over 175 businesses were assigned to committee members for visitation. For various reasons (gone out of business, wrong address/phone, left town, decline process. While the TVEDC did not achieve its target for visitation count, the Retention Committee has been by far the most active and reliable in this past year. With a core of dedicated participants, the committee met regularly and undertook its tasks in a highly professional manner. The Retention Committee added the executive director of the Chamber of Commerce and invited the President of the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturer's Council to participate in developing a new business welcoming process. While referred to as a "welcoming" program, the intent is more accurately described as offering resource and orientation support and assistance to those businesses that are in the transition period between the time they select Temecula and when they actually get into operation. This effort is ready to implement. The Retention Committee completed: 1. a compilation of past visitation data; 2. developing a new, comprehensive visitation survey instrument; 3. developing a coordinated data matrix; 4. developing and assembling comprehensive packets to be presented at business visitations; and 5. re-ranking target list of businesses based on new business inventory assembled by the City. As intended, our visitations did reveal certain concerns and discontent. In every case we followed up with appropriate action. Perhaps the most notable instance involved a company contemplating leaving Temecula due to an old issue with former City employees. This issue was passed onto the City Manager who responded immediately to successfully resolve the issue. The process worked very well in this case. EXPEDITING - Fortunately, the Expediting Committee was barely visible this year with the notable exception of the workshop presented in the Fall. Over the course of the year, a few (less than five) issues emerged, but they were effectively resolved by individual intervention. As part of the expediting and facilitating mission, TVEDC representatives sat on the sign ordinance comment panel, and the Industrial Committee played an advocacy role in the debate over Developer Impact Fees. SPECIAL PROGRAMS - Between and among the focused economic development tasks undertaken, 'I'VEDC engages in and/or responds to a number of other projects and activities. This past year, the TVEDC: Began investigating a loan subsidy program that could be established as a financial incentive. This program, if implemented, will be in lieu of a micro- loan program, and will not be a "last resort" program. It will be an incentive program for preferred qualified business. Represented the Temecula area at the California Incubator Conference, CALED Conference and the California Downtown Association annual conference. Hosted the Riverside Community College International Trade representative through October. The reorganization caused a suspension of service; this can be reviewed in the upcoming year. 4. Restablished/edited the TVEDC Website. 5. Updated and revised the Community Profile. 6. Assisted in distribution of the completed CD-Rom. The City staff stepped in and assumed the lead role on the final production. 7. Gave a public presentation to the Lion's Club of Temecula. 8. Staffed a TVEDC booth at the SWRC Manufacturer's Council Business Expo. 9. Regularly attended the monthly meetings of and cooperated with the SWRC Manufacturing Council. 10. Initiated discussions with Mt. San Jacinto Community College on developing a specialized curriculum for essential tool and die training. 11. Concluded a telemarketing effort begun in the prior year. Effort focused on expanded name recognition among professional real estate companies and real estate divisions of Southern California major employers. The 'I'VEDC, overall, effectively restructured itself to meet the challenges of competitive economic development. For the year just ending, and the year just beginning, the 'I'VEDC achieved its goals in quality and performance, even if identified task quantities were sometimes below expectations. Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation 1997-98 Work Plan and Operating Budget At the regular meeting of the Board of Directors, held April 23, 1997, the attached work plan and operating budget for the year 1997-98 was unanimously approved. This program, budget and accompanying request for City support is a departure from past practice in a couple of aspects. First, this work program reflects a commitment not just to job creation and/or development, but rather, to building long term community and economic prosperity. This plan is not oriented to growth, but rather, it is focused on developing all of Temecula's wealth - human, social, natural and financial. It is a program designed to serve the needs of today's Temecula without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The communities that prosper will be those that develop strategies to create resilient local economies that make the unique strengths of their people and their place a source of competitive advantage. This program is the beginning of just such a strategy. Second, this is a funding request for a program, not an organization. The TVEDC seeks funding to pursue the economic development programs that benefit the community without the encumbrance of member recruitment. TVEDC has a loyal core of members and their contributions are reflected in our budget. If that membership grows, however, the TVEDC is prepared to return a percentage of that extra income to the City; this allows us to keep an uncompromising eye on the economic development goals. Economic development programs are people intensive. Hence, the TVEDC seeks expanding its staff by using a contract employee 30 hours per week for 40 weeks over the year. This position will cost $28,800. In 1996-97, the City of Temecula appropriated $71,400 for the TVEDC (but allocated only $61,400). The TVEDC seeks to increase the City support by $18,600 to $90,000. That increase will go to offset part of that contract position. The four goals each focus on enhancement for Temecula's residents. They can accommodate a natural growth, but growth is not the goal. The strategies build on and refine programs that have a history of being effective. The tasks are results driven and can be accomplished through the conscientious collaboration of the City and our members. The economy of Temecula as a whole depends upon the success of its many parts, constituencies and agencies. Through our combined efforts the City of Temecula and TVEDC can create an environment that promotes entrepreneurship, innovation, and business and community responsibility by marshalling local resources to address economic need. GOALS GOAL I Increase The Number Of Jobs Available To Temecula Residents To Accommodate Population Growth Plus 1%. Measurement: Second quarter 1996 show 18,503 jobs and a population of 44,000, a ratio of one job to every 2.38 residents. Our goal is to increase jobs that will both accommodate growth as well as reduce the ratio by 1%. Data received from State of California. GOAL II Preserve Annual Per Capita Wage/Salary; If Feasible, Seek 1% Increase. Measurement: Second quarter 1996 shows a per capita income of $9,917. Our goal is to ensure that figure does not decrease annually. We shall put forth efforts to increase by 1%. Data received from State of California. GOAL III. Reduce Number Of Residents Commuting Long Distances (45 Minutes Each Way) By 3%. Measurement: 1994 labor survey and a special survey prepared for residential circulation. GOAL IV, Develop Enhanced Regional Collaboration For Economic Development; Expand Scope And Vision Of The EDC. Measurement: Participation, involvement, and increases in basic community wealth indices such as job growth, local wages, unemployment, technology transfer, educational achievement, new development, and the like. STRATEGIES A. BUSINESS ASSISTANCE · Workshops · Expediting/Regulatory Review · Media/Press Relations · Resource Development B. BUSINESS RETENTION · Visitation · Intervention · Resource Development C. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/ENHANCEMENT · Expansion · Start-ups · Attraction/Recruitment D. COMMUNITY/OUTREACH AND COLLABORATION Eo · Community Outreach/Information Dissemination · Interagency/Inter-Community Relations · Promotions/Public Relations/Media Campaigns · Member Relations EDUCATION · Accessibility · Curriculum Development · Training/Employment Links TASKS/ACTIONS A. BUSINESS ASSISTANCE 1. Conduct four workshops annually on timely issues. 2. Periodic reviews of regulatory provisions to identify obstacles to economic growth. 3. Prepare and issue media/press releases as appropriate. 4. Develop and maintain a business resource user library at the TVEDC office. 5. Initiate an inter-business referral network. 6. Solicit volunteer professionals to serve on ad hoc advisory task forces assembled to assist troubled/struggling businesses. B. BUSINESS RETENTION 7. Conduct 120 business visits. Conduct surveys, distribute resource materials. 8. Host individual lunches for the CEOs of Temecula's top 20 private employers. 9. Mobilize expediting teams to assist businesses with regulatory processes. 10. Assemble and train volunteers to respond as a Red Team. 11. Develop and disseminate a financial resource directory. 12. Develop and disseminate a directory of public/quasi-public agencies offering a general profile of the agency and a comprehensive inventory and description of the programs offered by each agency. C. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/ENHANCEMENT 13. Develop a series of target lists for attraction efforts. Focus will include electronics, health related (bio, mdm, etc.) technology, pastics. Cluster development will be evaluated/formulated. 14. Make mail and personal contact with CEOs of target list, and with unsolicited inquiries, trade show contacts and magazine advertising responses. 15. Coordinate visitations to target companies (Business Attraction Teams). 16. Coordinate visits by company representatives to include (as reasonable and appropriate) lunches, tours, golf outings, and the like. 17. Develop and distribute to active prospects resource materials including funding programs, SBDC programs, regulatory compliance, and other resources. 18. Design and distribute to CEOs business focused attraction products that differentiate Temecula from the countless other communities issuing slick marketing materials. 19. Evaluate and design financial incentive programs that could be implemented locally. 20. Conduct mail survey of Temecula residents to gain new data on labor force commute trends. 21. Maintain useable, current data relevant to business decision makers. 22. Design, develop, and maintain a comprehensive building and property directory and area business directory. 23. Design and implement a bonus incentive program to reward persons who Assist in Temecula's acquiring a new enterprise. 24. Attend trade shows as appropriate; custom design handout materials; follow-up on leads. COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND COLLABORATION 25. Conduct four member luncheons. 26. Maintain memberships/seats/participatory relationships with community groups and area governments. 27. Print/issue four newsletters annually. 28. Design and offer advertising space on the TVEDC web site. Eo 29. Participate in the City of Temecula's marketing effort as is necessary and appropriate. 30. Assist, on a case-by-case basis, with collaborative promotions, public relations and media campaigns. 31. Implement a community outreach/information dissemination/action alert system on issues of relevance to economic development. 32. Public presentations/image enhancement. 33. Design and implement new performance measures based on overall community standards. EDUCATION Team with all area educators to expand the number and type of educational opportunities at local/neighborhood sites. Team with area educators to develop special curricula expressly to fill an identified void in the business community. Maintain web site and e:mail system, including regional/state links. Coordinate with local industry to identify labor/education needs and current training expertise for cross-use (business to business training). Seek appropriate foundation grants to purchase new/expanded computer equipment for training use. Survey local community to develop base of expertise of local active and retired professionals; formulate outline to utilize these professionals in training/teaching programs. Develop and maintain a list of technical assistance providers and training opportunities. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. '['VEDC 1997-1998 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY REVENUE Memberships - Cash City Contract County Contribution Special Event Revenue (Golf) [Net] Quarterly Luncheons Advertising Interest Income Miscellaneous Revenue TOTAL 1997-98 REVENUE 50,000 90,000 5,000 16,000 3,800 700 400 100 166,000 EXPENSES PERSONNEL SERVICES (3 Positions) DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSE DIRECT PROGRAM EXPENSE EQUIPMENT EXPENSE TOTAL 1997-98 BUDGET EXPENSE 126,000 28,500 9,000 2,500 166,000 5~30~97 1997-98 Proposed Budget Page I TEMECULA VALLEY FrLM COUNCIL FUND]2qG REQUEST FY9$ ATTACHMENT F Temecula Valley Film Council Business Plan for Fiscal Year 1997-1998 Submitted by: Jo Moulton Mark A. & Mickie Evans March 5, 1997 Board of Directors Mark Evans, President Sunny Pouison Thomas, Vice President Carl Love, Secretary Elaine Miller, Treasurer Tim Miller, Legal Counsel Jeff Comerchero Brian Padberg Dr. Fred Huber Stephanie Cuip Dick Rainey Staff Jo Moulton, Exec. Director Mickie Evans, Office Administrator TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL BUSINESS PLAN 1997/1998 1997 marks the fifth year of the Temecula Valley Film Counci!'s entry into the competitive arena of t'dm commissions. State of the art theater screens are proliferating everywhere as billions of dollars continue to be spent every year in producing motion pictures, commercials, music videos and television shows. Competition for lucrative production project dollars is intense. Fortunately for Temecula, the Temecula Valley Film Council has positioned itself creatively to have a chance at a slice of these lucrative dollars. By producing an event that is normally within the realm of world capitals and destination places, the film council's ambitious undertaking of its very own t'dm festival has succeeded in creating a growing interest in the Temecula Valley as Hollywood's most attractive, new geographically desirable t'dmmaking destination. The Temecula Valley Film Council marketing and business plan for the new fiscal year 1997-1998 will continue to focus on the following: 1. MARKETING An aggressive campaign of direct personal calling along with direct mail and indirect solicitation to attract the t'dm industry to Temecula. This includes: Participation in I'dm industry related trade shows, specifically, Showbiz Expo in June, 97 at the Los Angeles Convention Center, the Natpe Convention in January'98 and AFM Market in March, 1998. am Advertising in selected issues of Daily Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, Location Update, LA411 and the Hollywood Reporter Biu Book Directory. Continued membership in the Association of Film Commissioners (International) ~ 3RD ANNUAL TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL, a celebration of the imagination through filn~ In keeping with this year's festival slogan, the festival has expanded its event programming by accepting aH film genres. The last two years, film entries were limited to romantic comedies. m Be o A. B. C. D. ge ~ TEMEKU AWARDS. This project is still in its preliminary stage. It is an awards/banquet event specifically designed to honor and acknowledge broadcast, print and multi- media professionals of the Inland Empire/Riverside County region. This is non-maintream professionals' answer to established awards show like the Oscars, the Emmy's, etc. OIYTREACH Hosting a familiarization tour. Location Scouts, Location Managers, Producers, Directors, Cinematographers, Unit Managers, Writers, Travel Editors, Location Magazine Editors, Trade Publication Editors (Daily Variety, Hollywood Reporter, On Location, Location Update) will be invited to preview Temecula as a poss'ble site for their feature film, television or commercial projects. ~ Invite television shows to do taeir shows live in Temecula. On ratings periods, networks like to do their shows on location just to be different and to garner as much ratings points as possible. The Film Council is currently working aggressively to convi£ce Ted Koppe!'s Nightline to do a Town HaH Meeting type of show here in Temecula. Subject suggested is: "America's Burgeoning 'Edge Cities'. Ter~ecula is a perfect example of the 'edge city" phenomena. Continue to organize t'dm indcstry related workshops. Invite industry professionals like News Directors, Set Designers, Casting Directors, Special Effects Specialists to talk on v~rious film/tv industry issues. OPERATIONS Continue to maintain a Locati, ms Library ( photos of various locations sites). Update Production Guide/Sup ~ort Services Directory. Update mailing list of contact ~ersons (location managers, producers,etc). Produce a Film Council Newsletter, highlighting Temecula and surrounding area's unique location sites, local film/video production crews, talent and film council activities. Continue to act as the focal point for all film related inquiries, production and support service informatioa to the industry, education to local merchants to the opportunities of servicing the film industry and to promote the relocation of l"dm crews and flirt companies to the area to generate film activity and new jobs. e BUDGET REQUEST FOR 1997/1998 Reprint of TVFC Prod. Guide/Location Postcards $6,000 Both the Production Guides and Location postcards have been the Film Council's main marketing tools. The guide contains everything a producer, director, unit manager or location scout needs to know about t'dming in Temecula and surrounding areas. The guide needs updating yearly to keep the information in a somewhat current state. The Location postcards are distributed at trade shows. Location Scout/Survey Services $5,000 These dollars will be used mainly to cover expenses incurred during location scouting trips for production companies. Average number of days for location scouting per project is 3. Costs involve films (approx. rolls of 35mm film used per scouting trip is 12, at 24 or 36 exposures per roll) film developing and gasoline expenses. To date, the film council receives at least 18 location requests a month. These dollars will also be used to continue building the Locations Library. Still panoramic photos, exterior and interior photos of frequently requested location sites are maintained to service on the spot requests by scouts and production managers. Trade Shows $10,000 These dollars will be used to pay towards expenses for attending ShowBiz Expo'97 at the Los Angeles Convention Center, the Natpe Convention'98 and AFM Market in March'98 at Loews, Santa Monica. FAM Tour $2,000 Hosting expenses for a familiarization tour planned for October'97. Location scouts, managers, producers, directors, writers, set designers, trade publication editors, travel editors will be invited to preview Temecula as a possible site for their feature film, television or commercial projects. Print Media Advertising $12,000 These dollars will be used to pay for advertising in selected issues of Daily Variety, Hollywood Reporter, Location Update, Locations Magazine, selected Film Festival programs/directories, LA411 and the Hollywood Reporter Biu Book Directory. TOTAL REQUEST $35,000 1997/1998 REV-ENUEg 1. Production Guide'98 2. Temecula Valley International Film Festival 3. Friends of the Festival Donations 4. Miscellaneous Fundraisers 5. City Funding (see attached budget) EXPENDITURE~ BUDGET ESTIMATE 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Print Media Advertising Trade Shows FAM Tours/Location Scouting Executive Director (Part time) Prod./Services Directory/Location Postcards Telephone Postage Insurance AFCI Membership Office Rent Office Supplies Electricity TOTAL TOTAL NET $4,000 $10,000 $3,000 $6,000 $35,000 $57,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $12,000 $5,000 $3,000 $1,200 $2,500 $500.00 Donated Donated Donated $54,200 $2,800 .'.I! ,, __~., · ......... or for your Free Production Guide ........ ' 27645 jefferson Avenue, Suite ~04-A · Temecula, CA 92590 (~9) 699-6267 I ~I I I I I i ~I I No permit fees, no red tape Location scouting assistance · Great accommodations super suppor~ services · Terrific California weather · Estate homes Easy, fast access to Hollywood · Charming small towns, western towns Picturesque wineries, lush vineyards · Lakes & streams, rolling hills o Thoroughbred ranches, groves · Strip shopping centers "Film friendly" community · Infinite variety... ' I I I" I ~ ,II!-' ' ;..~, ~.,~ . ~. ,. _ .:~:~..,....~...~ ....~:~:~ .... LOCATION: Western Towns Old Town Temecula Movieland Frc~ntiertown · ~..:. ~. .... ; ,:' .: Calico Ghost Town Pioneertown Temecula Valley Film Council Activity Report for November/December, 1996 November 4 - November 22, 1996 Film Feature filming of"Whine Country" Locations used were a residence in Bear Creek, Butterfield Square, Old Town Jewelers, Spirited Sisters Trading Post, and Mount Palomar Winery Area businesses used to provide various services were: Attraction Balloons, Prime Equipment, Spano's Flying Adventures, Togo's Eatery, Comfort Inn, Country Signs, Kinko's Copies, Potamus Press, Lucky's Supermarket, Fish Exchange, Peony's Chinese Restaurant, Presto's Gourmet, Pam's Donuts, Albertson's Supermarket, El Rancho Animal Hospital, Long's Drugs Local residents hired to do production and engineering crew work - 15 Salary ranged from $600-$8,000. Economic Impact for 11 days of filming in the area: $46,000 Producer/Director Joe Khoury is hoping to start post production work on the film in January. He plans to enter the film at the film festival in September. The Community Variety Show will be revived, with some changes.. Auditions for hosts/talents will be Dec. 14-15, from 9am to 5pm at the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. (See Attached Press Release) Film Feature filming of"What Comes Around", set to start 3rd week of January. Locations being considered: Trailer Park on East Benton Road, Gas Station on Washington St./Murdeta, Temecula Market on Front St., Via Vaquero Rd./De Luz Area. Local connection: Script was written by Joe Hudon of Rancho News. Joe Hudon submitted the script to Jo Moulton. Moulton gave it to a producer who showed it to a Director. Jo Moulton will be Line Producer and Assistant Director. Stacy Sievek has been hired to do all the Cmffing/Grip work. A list of additional local crew has been submitted to LA based director (Kevin Haasamd) for consideration. Auditions for a major role and three supporting roles and extras are set for Dec. 14 and 15 at the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. Film Council Activity Report Page 2 Estimated economic impact to Temecula for a 10 day shooting schedule is $60,000. Other areas to be used for the film are Barstow and Coachella Valley. Plans are now being formulated for the 1997 Film Festival. One great development is the fact that Blockbuster Entertainment Group has selected the Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival as one of approx. 10 Film Festivals in the country that the company will support with a monetary donation and publicity for their participation in Blockbuster's newly formed annual Student Film Award program. The winning student film fi-om each of these festivals will be submitted to Bluckbuster where a panel of judges will choose one film for the company's national award. We're told by Blockbuster Entertainment that Temecula is the least known of the festivals asked to participate, but Blockbuster executives like what they see happening in our festival and want to help us grow and gain national attention. They have committed publicity support and the use of all Blockbuster Video Stores south of Los Angeles as our Festival's Information/Ticket Outlet Center. We're kicking off the year with a fundraiser on January 25. Veteran Hollywood sramman Loren Janes will be giving a three hour presentation on stunts at the CRC Multi-Purpose Room. Discussions will include: what it takes to be a stunt person, an hour behind the scenes footage of actual movie stunts being planned and executed, and a question and answer session. Locations Expo'97 at the Los Angeles Convention Center in March.. The Film Council will be attending this big industry trade show to promote the 1997 Film Festival, distribute the Call for Entry forms to attending producers and directors, unveil the 1997 Festival Poster in addition to giving out the Film Council production guides and location postcards. Miko Food Corporation/Avocado Grove commercial shoot last October 21-24 in the De Luz area Filming of the commercial took three days. They brought in equipment and crew fxom Los Angeles. Still, according to their Production Coordinator, Ms. Misao, the production company managed to spend about $2,500 between accommodations, heavy equipmere rental, location rental, food and some incidental purchases. TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL 27645 Jefferson Ave., Suite 104A. Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 699-6267 FAX (909) 308-1414 Film Council Activity Report for December'96/January, 1997 Currently in pre-production phase for "Community Variety Show (a flee-flowing format in the classic tradition of magazine-variety shows, the Community Variety Show will have three main segments: Community News & Trends Update, the Quiz Challenge and Celebrity/Talent Spotlight). Auditions were held last Dec. 14/15 for local talents. Big turn-out. Audition hopefuls came from as far as Apple Valley and as diverse as Mark Lohman (Riverside Sheriffs Spokeman) and Linda Modok, a Temecula housewife!!. Final selection will be January 15. Campaign to generate sponsorships start January 13. Production is scheduled for Saturday, March 15. Production staff will be 100% local. Technical crew will be a combination out of area and obom 70% local. TCI-cable has committed a Monday airing schedule, 7:00-8:00PM. If everything goes as planned, this show should be able to generate a decent monthly funding support for the film council. Film Council Fundraiser- An Evening with Veteran Hollywood Stuntman, Loren Janes" is all set for January 25, 7:00-10:00pm. at the CRC Auditotium. Tickets are $7, adults and $5, children, students and children. Filming of "What Comes Around" might be pushed back to February. Producers have not made a final decision as to where exactly their main location will be but for sure, Temecula is at least going to have no less than 10 filming days of the movie's 30-day shooting schedule. Resumes from local residents have been submitted for consideration. 2 Location surveys have been done by the producers of "Big Bass Bonanza" Tentative shooting schedule is set for March. Location Expo (Feb.7-9, LA Convention Center) - The film council will attend the festival via Inland Empire Film Commission. Film Festival -- in early stages of getting the sponsorship package all finalized. Call for entries should be ready for mailing by first week of March. TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL 27645 Jefferson Ave., Suite 104A, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 699-6267 FAX (909) 398-1414 Film Council Activity Report January - February 1997 Two Los Angeles Times (Calendar/January 12 issue) articles on Film Festivals gave our Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival special mention. From these articles, the Film Council received numerous inquiries about the festival plus about 52 (to date) requests for Festival Call For Entry Forms. This is pretty good news considering our call for entry forms for 1997 are not even printed yet. Festival Sponsorship packets meanwhile, are done and are finally at the hands of our Festival sponsor development people (Catherine Aron & Zenda Parker of BRG). We hope they will be able to increase sponsorship participation this year. The Community Variety Show received its first major sponsor commitment from Pechanga Entertainment Center. If everything goes as planned, taping of the first four shows is scheduled for March 23. Edited shows are scheduled for broadcast on TCI Cable -Ch.8 on Mondays, 7:00-8:00pm starting Apr. 14, 21, 28 & May 5 The Community Variety Show is a family entertainment show offering viewers not only the most comprehensive community news and information but also the most diverse and complete community based entertainment program. The show will be produced network style-live on tape, on location, multiple camera format with rotating hosts, performing talents, competing schools and specials guests. It will be staffed by 90% local and 10% out of area crew. Location Surveys: a. Steve Skolnick scouted the area for a Subaru Jeep commercial. Location selected was the Santa Rosa Plateau. Permission to film Feb. 10- 12 was granted by the Conservancy. but postponed due to rainy/foggy/low clouds weather. No new date has been set due to star's busy schedule 0Vici Gibson is Subam's spokeperson in Japan and was available only Feb. 10-12). This commercial production involves a crew of 60, 5 production vehicles, and 6 picture cars. b. Location surveys for a Movie of the Week "With Savage Intent", an independent feature, "Presumed Guilty" and for a documentary, "Pain Free America" Properties in Temecula and Anza are being considered. Location Expo'97 at the LA Convention Center. The Film Council shared a large booth with the Inland Empire Film Commission. and California Film Commission. Distributed location postcards, production guides and Chamber of Commerce Visitors Guide/Wine Country brochures. IEFC and CFC will share their leads/contact names with the Film Council. Temecula Valley Film Council 27645 Jefferson Ave. Suite 104A Temecula, CA 92590 Financial Statement June 1,1996 - May 31, 1997 Account Name Friends of the Festival Production Guide Film Festival City Funding Miscellaneous Fundraisers In Kind Sponsors (Festival) TOTAL REVENUE Budget Estimate $ 3000.00 $ 40OO.O0 $10000.00 $30000. O0 $ 6OOO.OO Actual Revenue $ 540.0O $ 1714.89 $47960.51 $30000.0O $ 406.6O $88000.00 $168622.00 EXPENSES Account Name Insurance Telephone Mail/Postage Advertising Dues (AFCI Membership) Location Scouting Expense Trade Shows Production Guide/Postcards Film Festival ~,c~ t~c -) Trade/In-Kind Services(Film Fest) Priming/Collateral Materials Prof. Services/Consultant Fees Commissions TOTAL EXPENSES Budget Estimate $ 2500.00 $ 3000.00 $ 1200.00 $15000.00 $ 500.00 $ 5000.00 $10000.00 $ 5000.00 $68OOO.0O $15000.00 $12000.00 Actual Expenses $ 3330.35 $ 1705.78 $ 880.41 $ 3761.03 $ 500.00 $ 7329.35 $ 3069.00 $ 6340.00 $16314.37 $88000.00 $12805.64 $13500.00 $ 3393.42 $160929.35 NET INCOME $ 7692.65 Trade/In-Kind Services for 1996 Temecula Valley int'! Film Festival Sponsor Name The Mission Inn The Press Enterprise The Californian TCI Cablevision Inland Empire Business Journal KOLA 99.9 Embassy Suites Temecula Creek Inn KRTM 88.9 Maurice Printers Innovative Images CR&R Incorporated Tower Piaza/Layton BeHing & Associates Palm P!aza/CB Commercial Code 4 Protective Services GC Graphics & Printing Limelight Design Dimensions $Value of Sponsorship $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $10,000 $1,500 $1,500 $5,00O $1,500 $2,500 $1,000 $10,000 $5,o00 $2,500 $2,500 $5,00O $5,000 TOTAL IN KINDfFRADE $88,000 ITEMs-.19 APPRO'~~"-' CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF F~.N~E~ CITY MANAGER '~,?~_y~. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director~ DATE: June 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Planning Application No. PA96- 0345 (Development Plan) - Shell automobile service station, car wash, convenience mart, and a Kentucky Fried Chicken fast food restaurant with drive through service, at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the Palomar Village Shopping Center Prepared By: Carole Donahoe, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0345; 2. Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0345; 3. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE ci'rY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPMCATION NO. PA96-0345 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0~ (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 648 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH, A 875 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE MART (WITHOUT ALCOHOUC BEVERAGE SALES), AND A 1,645 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE- THROUGH SERVICE ON 0.794 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND YUKON, WITHIN THE PALOMAR VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER. R:',STAFFRPT%345PA96.CC] 6/3/97 dwh 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is the construction and operation of an automobile service station with a 648 square foot automated car wash, an 875 square foot convenience mart (without alcoholic beverage sales) and a 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service on 0.794 acres located at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon Road, within the Palomar Village Shopping Center. All uses are expected to operate seven (7) days per week. The service station was approved by the Planning Commission to operate from 5 a.m. to midnight; the car wash operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; and the fast food restaurant will operate 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. BACKGROUND Land Use According to the Development Code's Schedule of Permitted Uses automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash are permitted in the Community Commercial zone. Grocery stores are also a permitted use, which would allow the convenience mart without the sale of alcoholic beverages. The Director of Community Development determined that the KFC fast food restaurant with drive-through service is incidental to the main use of the site as an automobile service station, and is therefore also a permitted use. The development plan proposes construction under 10,000 square feet. Public Interest The applicant complied with the Planning Director's request for supplemental noticing of intent to file a project application, as well as project noticing requirements in accordance with State law. Staff received inquiries from adjacent and nearby residents. Staff met with the Villages homeowners at an evening meeting at the home of David Micheal. Staff also met several times with Frank Wagnon, whose property is across Yukon Road, and kept him up-to-date on the series of revisions that occurred with the project. Site Design Upon review of the initial submittal, staff identified several areas of concern. The applicant made major revisions to the development plan to address these concerns, to achieve compatibility with surrounding uses, and to comply with the requirements of the Development Code. The applicant reduced the size of the car wash and changed its location to the southernmost portion of the site, more than 200 feet from any residential district. The applicant provided landscaping adjacent to the car wash, along both sides of the drive-through aisle and within the parking areas. He agreed to enhance the landscaping within the existing 50 foot wide easement along Margarita Road, and to provide an approximately 33 foot wide bermed landscaped area with dense shrubbery along the northern perimeter. These measures will effectively screen the trash enclosure, catch any debris prior to routine cleanup, and buffer the project from residential uses across both Yukon and Margarita Road. The applicant modified the aisle widths to address concerns regarding internal circulation. R:\STAFFRPTLM5PA96.CC1 613/97 dwh 2 Conditions of approval insure compliance with Ordinance No. 655 regarding light pollution, Americans with Disabilities Act requirements for handicapped accessibility, and compliance with the City's Sign Ordinance. The project is conditioned to use colors compatible with existing colors within the Palomar Village Shopping Center. The Planning Director determined that the project, with reciprocal use of parking spaces and drive aisles with the other tenants within the shopping center, meets parking requirements of the Development Code. The Planning Director also determined that adequate stacking spaces are provided for the modified "express" menu offered by KFC. Eight (8) residents spoke in opposition to the project; minutes of the Director's Hearing is Attachment 3. The application was approved by the Planning Director on March 13, 1997 with amendments to the conditions of approval. The applicant agreed to construct a decorative block wall and cluster landscaping along the north side of the project. Appeal to the Planning Commission An appeal to the Planning Commission was filed on March 25, 1997 by Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven. Commissioner Slaven stated that she had a number of concerns with the design of the project. Her major concerns included the proposed 24-hour operation of the service station, the off-site illumination from the canopy lighting, and the need for an adequate landscape buffer on the north side of the project site. The Commission heard the appeal on April 7, 1997. Draft minutes are included in Attachment 4. Fourteen (14) residents spoke in opposition to the project and staff received eight (8) written letters of opposition. The appeal was denied and the Director's approval was upheld by a 3-2 vote with amendments to the conditions of approval. The Commission required that the service station and fuel deliveries be limited to 5 a.m. to midnight, that acoustical impacts to adjacent properties not exceed ambient noise levels, that the applicant install a catch basin to trap all ohsire waste products, and that no light spillage occur beyond the boundaries of the project site. Appeal to the City Council An appeal to the City Council was filed May 6, 1997 by Mr. David Micheal, President of the Villages Homeowners Association (see Attachment 2). Mr. Micheal cited concerns regarding traffic, noise, light, hazardous materials and safety. He provides three (3) alternatives to the project: 1) 2) 3) To deny the automobile service station and carwash and replace them with another business. To eliminate the carwash portion of the project and relocate the service station away from residential uses To swap land uses with one along Rancho California Road, such as Jiffy Lube, in order to locate automobile service and car wash more appropriately on a major street. Mr. Micheal asserts that the Environmental Study performed for the project by staff and the Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission is not sufficient. He requests a complete Environmental Impact Report be prepared for the project. R:\STAb"FRP'T~ISPA96.CC1 6/3/9"/dwh 3 Recluest for Information The appellant claims that public information was withheld, including environmental, carwash, and light studies. Mr. Micheal first requested information at the Villages Homeowners Association meeting. Items on his list were delivered to his home within one week. Mr. Micheal further requested traffic studies for the shopping center from staff after the Director's Hearing. However, a search of files in Planning, Public Works and the City Clerk's office were unsuccessful at locating a traffic study prepared for Riverside County when the center was approved in 1988. Staff offered Mr. Micheal copies of the General Plan and the General Plan Environmental Impact Report as an alternative because these documents would address his concerns with cumulative impacts of all development in this vicinity. In preparation for the Commission meeting, the applicant submitted an additional light study showing various illumination levels generated by the project. Prior to the filing of an appeal to the City Council, Mr. Micheal formally requested that the City Clerk copy the entire Planning casefile. This request was completed within three (3) days. To staff's knowledge all available information has been provided to Mr. Micheal. DISCUSSION The issues raised in the appeal include the following: Traffic on Yukon Road Appellant's Statement: Yukon Road is basically a residential access street. Supplemental Information: According to the Public Works Department, Yukon was designed as an "industrial collector" roadway. Having a 78-foot right-of- way width, Yukon is larger than a standard collector roadway (66- foot) and already carries the truck traffic that services the Palomar Village Shopping Center. Signalization Appellant's Statement: The intersection of Yukon Road and Margarita Road should be signalized as a result of this project. Supplemental Information: Noise According to the Public Works Department, the traffic generated by the project is anticipated at below the 5% allowable range of additional impact as noted in the City's General Plan. The City normally determines when an intersection needs signalization based upon warrants. The Palomar Village Shopping Center has contributed its fair share of traffic signal mitigation fees. Appellant's Statement: residences. Noise levels generated by the project will impact adjacent R:\STAFFRPT~5PA96.CC1 6/3/97 dwh 4 Supplemental Information: [.ights Appellant's Statement: Supplemental Information: Hazardous Materials Appellant's Statement: Supplemental Information: Children Appellant'is Statement: Supplemental Information: The site is within an existing commercial shopping center near the intersection of two arterials, Rancho California Road and Margarita Road. The 60 and 65 dB noise contours for Margarita Road are found onsite. The applicant has been conditioned not to impact adjacent residences with noise in excess of ambient levels per the City's General Plan. Based upon roadway noise contours and studies performed by Colia Acoustical Consultants dated April 11, 1991 it is anticipated that the project will meet this requirement. Light and glare generated by the project will have an impact on nearby residences. Staff had asked the applicant to address this same concern at the Development Review Committee meeting. With the assistance of the City's Chief Building Official the applicant modified the design of the station canopy lighting in order to focus illumination away from property lines while providing a safe environment. He will provide recessed light fixtures, lower the height of the canopy and modify the canopy edge. We want to protect the wash and citizens with adjoining homesites. The operation of the automobile service station will be regulated by the County Environmental Health Department and their division for hazardous materials. Additionally, the project is conditioned to meet federal requirements for National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System, and in accordance with NPDES best management practices, shall install a catch basin to trap all onsite waste products. The safety of children attending nearby schools is imperiled because their travel to school would conflict with the vehicular traffic generated by the project. According to the Temecula Unified School District, children in the Villages subdivision will attend Temecula Elementary, Margarita Middle School and will attend Chaparral High School in August and will travel in a northwesterly direction. Children living north of La Serena attend Rancho Elementary, Margarita Middle School and Chaparral High School and would travel west, east or north. Children in the Temeku Hills project area are bussed to Vintage Hills Elementary and Temecula Middle School. R:\STAFF~SPA96.CC! 6/3/97 dwh 5 Attachments: 4. 5. 6. 7. City Council Resolution - Page 7 Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Page 12 Appeal Application from David Micheal- Page 13 Minutes of the Director's Hearing of March 13, 1997 - Page 14 Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission Hearing of April 7, 1997 - Page 15 Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 7, 1997 - Page 16 Letters in Opposition - Page 17 Site Plan Exhibit - Page 18 R:\STAFFR.PTk345PA96.CCI 6/3197 dwh 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:\STAFFRPTk345PA96.CC1 613197 dwh 7 ATTACHlVIENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345 {DEVELOPMENT PLAN - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345 {DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 648 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH, A 875 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE MART {WITHOUT ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES), AND A 1,645 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH SERVICE ON 0.794 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND YUKON, WITHIN THE PALOMAR VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-700-017. WHEREAS, Nick Goyal filed Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Community Development Director considered Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) on March 13, 1997 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, the Community Development Director approved Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) with revised Conditions of Approval on March 13, 1997; WHEREAS, Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven notified the Community Development Department in writing on March 25, 1997 of her desire for Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) to be reviewed and considered by the Planning Commission; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) on April 7, 1997, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support of or opposition to the previously approved project; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after reviewing the staff report, receiving the applicant's presentation, and hearing all public testimony upheld the decision of the Community Development Director and added additional conditions of approval on Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) to protect the surrounding community; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 97-007 on April 21, 1997; R:\STAFFRFI'~SPA96.CCI 6/3/97 dwh 8 WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan - Appeal) was filed May 6, 1997; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan - Appeal) on June 10, 1997, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support of or opposition to the previously approved project; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA96-0345; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. findings; to wit: Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following A. That the proposed commercial land use is appropriately located within a Community Commercial Zoning District that is part of the Palomar Village Shopping Center; B. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 0Vlt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions; C. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare; surrounding area; That the design and layout of the facility minimize its impact on the E. That to ensure the facility's compatibility with the surrounding area, the following items need to be addressed in the project's design and the Conditions of Approval: times for fuel deliveries; Limiting the hours of operation for the service station and the 2. Preventing off-site light spillage from under the pump canopy; Enhancing the screening and landscaping along the northern portion of the site; R:\STAFFRPTX345PA96.CCI 6/3197 dwh 9 4. Requiring appropriate methods to prevent fuel spills and contaminated urban runoff from reaching area storm drains and stream channels; and, service car wash. Reducing the potential noise impacts from the proposed self- F. That an Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has been determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions of Approval added to the project. G.. That the project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project site has been previously disturbed and graded, and street scape installed on site. There are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no any indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. A De Minimus Impact finding can be made for this project. Section 3. Approval The City Council hereby upholds the decision of the Planning Commission and conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Attachment A. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTEl) this 10th day of June, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:[STAFFRPT~SPA96.CCI 613/97 dwh 1 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) s$ CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-m was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 10th day of June, 1997 by the following vote, to wit: AYES' COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk R:\STAFFRF'rk345PA96.CCI 6/3/97 dwh 1 1 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\STAFFRPTk345PA96.CCI 6/3197 dwh 1 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Revised April 21. 1997 Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) Project Description: To construct and operate a Shell automobile service station with a 648 square foot automated car wash, a 875 square foot convenience mart {without alcoholic beverage sales) and a Kentucky Fried Chicken 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service. All uses shall operate seven (7) days per week. The service station is proposed to operate from (; a.m. to ,,,;d~;ght 24-hours from 5 a.m. to midnight; the car wash operation shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.; and the fast-food restaurant shall operate 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. (Amended by the Planning Director, March 13, 1997) (Amended by the Planning Commission. April 7, 1997) Assessor's Parcel No. Approval Date: Expiration Date: 921-700-017 March 13, 1937 April21, 1997 March 13, 19~ Apri121, 1999 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration with a DeMinimus Finding required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction R:\STAFFRPTk345PA96.pc¢ 6/3/97 ckd o contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by the approval. All fuel deliveries shall be between the hours of 7 a.,~. to 7 p.,,,. 5 a.m. to midnight. (Added by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997) (Amended by the Planning Commission, April 21, 1997) Acoustic impacts to adjacent properties shall not exceed ambient noise levels per the City's General Plan. [Amended by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997] The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit "A" Site Plan approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0345, or as amended by these conditions. Prior to the issuance of a buEding permit, the applicant shall submit a site plan showing the location of trash receptacles for all uses, subject to review and approval by the Planning Manager. (Added by the Planning Director, March 13, 1997) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a site plan showing the location, materials and elevation of a wall at the north side of the project, subject to review and approval by the Planning Manager. [Added by the Planning Director, March 13, 1997) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a site plan showing the location of a catch basin installed to trap a// on-site waste products. [Amended by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997) The building shall conform substantially with Exhibit "BI," "B2," and "B3" Elevations; Exhibit "C1," "C2," and "C3" Color Elevations; and Exhibit "D" Floor Plan, approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0345 or as amended by these conditions. Material Color Building walls Cement plaster to match shopping center Roof Metal to match shopping center Decorative stonework To match shopping center Accent stripe for building, car wash, canopy Cement plaster in Shell yellow Cupola To match building roof and shopping center Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view. bo A lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval that indicates fixture type, dimensions, color and materials. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Service canopy light fixtures shall be recessed. Lighting shall comply with Ordinance No. 655 regarding light pollution. Light fixtures shall be installed in such a manner that no light spillage occurs beyond the boundaries of the project site. (Amended by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997) R:~TAFFRPT'G45PA96.pcc 6/3/F7 ckd The applicant shall use colors that are compatible with the color palette existing for the Palomar Village Shopping Center. If the color white is used, it shall be for accent only. Landscaping shall be installed in substantial conformance with Exhibit WE" Conceptual Landscape Plan approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0345 or as amended by these conditions. a. All utilities on site shall be appropriately screened. b. Root barriers shall be provided for all trees within five feet of hardscape. The applicant shall ensure that mature trees do not interfere with driveway sight lines or overhead power lines. A final grading plan shall be submitted along with final landscape construction plans so that cross checking for erosion control can be performed. The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 94-22 regarding water conservation. Additional shrubs shall be planted on the northern berm to create a dense barrier to catch debris prior to routine cleanup of the site. Shrubs along the wa# separating the project site from Yukon Road shall be moved from the inside of the wall facing the project to the outside of the wa// facing Yukon. (Amended by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997] All trees p/anted on the site shall be a mixture of deciduous and evergreen species. However, trees along Yukon Street shall be primarily evergreen. All new trees shall be predomi,]ant/y 24-inch box in size. (Added by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997) (Amended by the Planning Commission, April 21, 1997) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 10. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the .development. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 11. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid. 12. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. R:\STA~SPA95.pcc 6/3/9'7 ckd 13. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. 14. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. Sign approvals are not part of this development plan. An application for signage shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager· No sign shall be affixed on, above or over the roof of any building, including service station canopies. 16. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans. 17. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 18. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephone In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 19. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Department of Planning. R:\STAFFP. PT'~ISPA96.pcc 6/3/97 ckd 20. 21. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Disabled access regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. Submit at time of plan review complete exterior site lighting plans in compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. The Occupancy Classification of the proposed use shall be B/M/S-3 (KFC/Sales/Fuel Dispensing, Carwash). All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations and must be fully detailed for plan check submittal. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April I, 1994). Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide dimensions (space #10). Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record, the truss manufacturer's engineer, and that have been plan checked and stamped by the plan check agency and the City, are required before sheet and shear inspection. Provide an approved Precise Grading Plan with plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. R:~STAFFRFI't345PA96.pcc 6/3197 ckd PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 35. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 36. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 37. All grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. 38. All plans shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits: 39. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 40. The Developer must comply with applicable source control and treatment control best management practices (BMPs) as identified in the "Ca//fornia Stormwater BMP Handbook" for industrial and commercial uses, to satisfy NPDES and the City. (Added by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997) 41. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Planning Department Department of Public Works Eastern Municipal Water District Rancho California Water District Community Services District General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company R:\STAFFR.F'I"~5?A96.pcc 6/3/F7 ckd 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. A Precise Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, City Standards and as additionally required in these Conditions of Approval. A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. An Erosion Control Plan in accordance with City Standards shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval for offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. Concentrated onsite runoff shall be conveyed in concrete ribbon gutters or underground storm drain facilities to an adequate outlet as determined by the Department of Public Works. Letter of approval or a drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the precise grading plan. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans and/or precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: R:\STA~SPA96.pcc 613/9'7 ckd Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. end 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. All drive areas shall be designed for two-way, 24-foot travelways with unobstructed access across the proposed multi-use site. All driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit: 55. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Planning Department Department of Public Works 56. All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 57. The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. 58. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 59. The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; I;)rovided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. Prior to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy 60. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: RASTAFF~SPA96.pcc 6/319'7 ckd Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works 61. The Developer shall confirm that reciprocal access and parking easement agreements are in place for all shared private facilities. 62. All onsite improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, and landscaping, as directed by the Department of Public Works. 63. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 64. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES 65. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated December 24, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 66. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated February 4, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 67. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated December 26, 1996, a copy of which is attached. 68. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Fire Department transmittal dated February 4, 1997. R: \STAFFRP"~345PA96.pc¢ 6/3/97 ckd DAVID P. ZAPI~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 MARKET By Re: hazard re~xms for suc~ _.ca~e~.. D' .mme.. _~~r. eco,,~agt~ona for -~..m.~ ~~ ~ m ~e~ at Area Draln~ ~ i~ (~e~m~t ~1~ f~s). In ~. ~a.h~ ~ a g~ ~e ~ pmv~. The ~ has not .re. viewed the Iproix~sea ~otect in detad amt ~ fol~.che~ced c4~b,.e~ ~o not m .any way consalute m lm13~y District al~WOVal or en4orsemem of the ~'oposea proloci ~ respect to Iloo;I ~, ~ ~ea~h and safety or any omar suc~ ~ssue: v/This ~ wcx~l not be impacted tW OisUict Master Drainage Plan ~ nor are other tacililias o~ reg~nat inlerNt iDrol:~Ose(L This I:)rofect mvolvas _:.l:)~_t M~.....ler Plan ta~l~. ~e ~ ~11 a~N ~ of ~ ~ on ' ~ ,~ at me ~,~. F~es must ~ ~nst~ m ~t_ _~a~, and .-~ ~ ~ ~ inS~ will N mNma f~ U~t a~ptance. ~ ~K~ ma~l:~an and ~msnhve fe~ we ~ reelarea. Th~s prelect i:wo~...ct~. s. torm .drains. 36inchas or ..l~'ger in diameter, or olher facililies mat could De consi~erecI regional ,1 Ilalm'e_ana/or a iog~,,~l exlens~on of Master Or4mage Plan. ine District would con_sider m:r,,el~ ownership at such f'ac~l~e~ on whiten re of me Cily. Fa- 'clJes must tm cons_tructecl to District stm~lards. and Dislnc~ plan check and ~ will be required for District acceptance. Plan check. Jnspeceon anO aclmmistmlive fees wdl be requireeL wittan me linals at the ~slncrs HugKIF'r'~ ~.g£E~_/?F..~CU/..~ )'Area This pro'_te~. ,s located I/ALc~ Oislr~ or City prior to nn~! ap.j~Oval of the Prolect, or in the c~se of a parcel m~l~ m' $ .~livi~n prior to recordation oflhe 6n~l map. ~.ees to l>e pmO should be ~! ~e rale in elle~l at ~ W ol reoocOalion, or ~ ae~, at the I~ ~ issuan~ of the actual parma. GFNF~ INFORMATION This prolect may reqmre a.N, alicmal Polulam Discharge Elimma~n System iNPDES) pem~ from the Slate Water ~e$ources Conlrol Board. ~,lem'ance for grachng, recordation. or ol/ter final air,oval shouKI no( be gwen umil lira City has de~ermmea that the ~olec~ has been granted a Dem',l or is sno~n to be exeml~L If this proleer involves a Fede~aI.Em~rgen~ Manage. merit Agency (FEMA) ,,. ~r¢ gd ~ plain, .then. me ~ty shocdd reouire the aDl:~,anf (o provue all stuoms, calculations. Diane and other mfon~lUOn requwed Io meet FEMA reeu~emems. aria shoula ..f~me.r require that. the aDDImam oe~ama. Cond'dional Letter Of Mao Revmon (CLOMR) prior m graa~g, recomahon or omar nnm approvm of the protect, anaa Letter of Map Rawsine (LOMR) I~'lor to oeec_ ~upancy. If a natur_al watercourse or maopea aooa plain ~s ~moacted 13¥ this IXOfeCt, the City should requa'e t~e aDpiicant to ootam a 5ect~on 160111603 Agreement from the Ca#foram Department of Fish an0 Game anal a Clean VValer Act .S. ectlon 40:4.. Parma from. me U.S. An'ny Corl~ of E.ng2.neers..or. w .n~t~. _corresl:x:mae..n~. ~ ...thee_ ~eg~c...~3. mdical~g me Drolecz is exempt Iro_m these r_equ,reme0ts. A_(;lean water Ac_t Section 401 Water Qua,ty r~_ rtmca,on may required from me local Califorma ~eg~onat water Mualdy Control Board I~or to issuance ot the CorDs 404 Ve~f truly yours. STUART E. MCKIBBIN se.,orC?, e"g.?-. , TO: ATTN: Carole K. Donahoe FROM: ~'~GREGOR DELLENBACH. Environmental Health Spe¢iali~y RE: PLOT PLAN NO. PA96-0345 (Development Plan} County of Riverside.._ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ,~i~)~ DATE: r)ec&nber 26, 19~)6 The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan{ and has no objecttons. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area. PRIOR TO .4NY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance. the following items are required: "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing sch(mlule in order to ensur~ compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at ~909) 694-5022]. A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 69a,- 5022 will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: a) Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4. b) Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3. c) Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance w~th Ordinance # 651.2}. Waste reduciion managemenl. O. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collec~io~LEA). GD:dr 275-8980 .'VOTE: Any current additional reqmrements not covered. can be applicable at time of Building Plan review tor tlnal Department of Environmental Health clearance. City of Temecula l~04~ b~4,~,4~ · F~ (9091 ~94-~9 February ,~, 1997 TO: Planning Department C~role Donahoe RE: PA96-0345 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced development plan, the Fire Department recommends the following ~u'e proteotmn menures be provided in accordance v, qth Tcmecuia Ordinaries and/or recogmzed fire protection standards: The ~'e Department is reelrated m set a minimum f~e flow for the remodel or consauction of all commerc~ building using the procedures established m Ordinance 546. A ~ flow of 2500 GPM for a 2 hour dtu~on at 20 PSI residual ~g pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. The required fire flow shaJJ be available from a super fire hydrant (6"x4"x2-2 '/2" ), located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any pomon of the building ~ rn~'~sur~rl nlor~ vehictdnr tr~velw~ys. Applicant/developer stroll furnish one copy of the water plans Io the Fire Deparm~t for review. Plans ~ be signed by a regis~ civiJ engineer, containing a Fire Depat, tment approval signnntre block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and hummum P. re flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shatl be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The requu, ed water sys~m, including fire hydr'a~ts, shaU be installed and accepted by the appropm~e water agency prior to.an), combustible bufidin~ materinJs being placed on the job site. Prior to the issuance of budding permits, the developer shall pay $.25 per quare foot as mitiganon for fire protection impact. 6. Prior to the it~uance of building permits, the apl~,ant/developer shall be respons~ie. to sut)mit a plan check fee of $582.00 to the City of TernecOa. TItE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. 7. Knox Key lock boxes shall be installed on all buildinp/suites. If building/suiu~ require~ Hazardous Ma~l Reporung (Material Safety Datn Sheets) the Knox IiAZ IvIAT Data and key stogie cabinets shah be restailed. If buUding/sui~ age protected by a frre or burglag alarm system, the boxes will require "rantper" tootUtoring. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Depamnent for approval prior to installation. 8. All exit doors shah be openable without the use of key or special knowledge or effort. /ns~U portable fire extragushers with a minimum r'al~g of 2A 10BC. Contact a certified exunguisher company for proper placement. 10. Applicant/d~veloper shall be responsible for o~ainJng underground and aboveground tank permi~ from both the County tteaith and Fire Depamnent~. ! ]. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted m private streets and driveways to indic~t~ location of fi~e hydrants. They shaU be toountil m the middle of the street direotly in line with f'tre hydrant. Prior to final respection of any building, the appUcant shall provide f'tre lanes with appropriate lane painnng and or signs. ! 3. St~est addt~ shall be posted, m a visible location, minimum 12 inches m height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. ~.~. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans ~re reviewe~ m the Building and S~fety Office. 15. Plea.~e contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. All quesnons r~ga~ding the meamng of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering secuon (909)693-39'74. ra Cabral · ,rc Sa£ety Specialist December 24, 1996 Ms. CarDie Donahoe, Case Planner City of Temecuta Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 C 966L 4 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABIUTY PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP 23472 APN 921-700-017 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 96.0345 Dear Ms. Oonahoe: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located wilhin lhe boundaries of Rant"no California Waler District (RCWD). Water sen/ice, therefore, would be available upon completion of f'mancial arrangements belween RCWD and the property owner. !f fire prolection is required, customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve BrannOn, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 96/S8:mc~16/F01 ~FEG Laurie Williams, Eng,neenng $erv,ces Supervisor Engineering Services ATTACHMENT NO. 2 APPEAL MEMORANDUM R:\STAFl~.PT~345PA~6.CCl 6/3/9'7 dwh 1 3 City of Teme ula 43200 Business Parle Dnve P.O. ~x ~33 ~ ~AY 0 6 ]997 Tem~ula, ~ifom~ (909) 694-64~ · FAX (~) 6~~By DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ;INCOMPLETE APII~fCA'!1OI~ C~ BE'&CCLalrr!~I :i:.. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO{S). PLANNING APPLICATION NO. ?~ q(/o "' (~)~ (~ 6 .. ~e of Review Requested: Annexation IAF) Appeal CEQA Conditional Use Permit ca Existing Building (MCUP) rq O 0 0 0 o New Building (In addition, check appropriate Development Plan) (CUP) Development Agreement t DA) Developmere Plan u Over 10,000 square feet, subject to CEQA {PPN9 ~ Under 10,000 square t~et, subject to CEQA (PP) c~ Under 10,000 square feet. not subject to CEQA (PPA) 0 Subdivision - Home Product Extension of Time for Planning Application No. General Plan Amendment ~GPA$) Minor Exception (PP2) Specific Plan (SP) Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Tract Map Variance (VAR) Zoning. Amendment: Text or Map Change, Specific Plan Amedment (CZ) FAX NO. L %?¢/ .~'A~11 ' FAX NO. MI. ADDRP-~ OWNER PHONE NO. FAX NO. ADDRESS AIaI~.ICANT'S SIGNAT~~' Pro~eet Information: Project Descnpnon/Use: Project Locanon: Application Type: Code Genera/Plan: Res. Use Type: Gross Acres: Overall Project Square Footage: Reia'.~ C~-ses: Proposed ProJect Phazmg: Esumated Number of Employees Per SNf~: Number of Lo~/Umu: (Office Use Only} # Units: # of Lots: Added Gross Acres: # Added Units: # Added Lots: Owner Certification I cerufy that I am presently the legzt owner or the authorized agent for the above-described propert3,. acknowledge the filing of this applicauon and certify that all of the above information is true and accurate. Signature: Print Name: Date: Aeent of the ownermust-attach a letter of. authorizatlon':from::the~ile~nl~ownev::, City of Temecma Community Development Department 43200 Business Park Drive * Temecula · CA · 92590 P.O. Box 9033, Temecula · CA · 92589-9033 (909) 694-6400 · FAX (909) 694-6477 8¥_ npl .a Original Case Number(s) ~/~ .~ /'~ ~ 4,~-'/-- The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or dissatisfied with an action taken by an administrative agency of the City in the administ~tion or enforcement of any provisions of the Development Code. B. FII.ING RF. QIIIRl:Mt::NTR 1. Development Application. 2. Appeal Form. 3. Filing Fee. C. NOTICE OF APPEAI~ - TIME. TIM'IT A notice of an appeal by any individual who is aggrieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by him or in his behalf, or with any action, order, requirement, decision or determination shall not be acted upon unless Hled within fifteen (15) calendar days after se~ce of written notice of the decision. D. NOTICE OF APPEAl,- CONTENTS Appealing the decision of: Specify exactly what is being appealed: 2119/97 Reason or justification to support ~e appeal. Appellant must submit wi~h this appeal each issue which the appellant alleges was wrongly determined together with every agreement and a copy of ev~'y item of evidence. (Attach separate sheet of paper if necessary). Desired action to be taken: In the event any Notice of Appeal applicant fails to answer any information set forth above, then the request will be returned to the appellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant shall be allowed five (5) calendar days in which to refile the notice of aI~al. Dear Sir~ ~ ~ Re: Appl. PA 960= ,/Shell Station & Car Wash _omplex in the Palomar Village in Temecula Ca. The Board of Directors join with the concerned citizens of the Villages Community HOA in stating that this is an inappropriate addition to the Palomar Shopping Center. It will have a major impact on safety, quality of life, and home values. The specific areas this includes: traffic, noise, light, hazardous materials, and the safety of our children. TRAFFIC: Yukon is basicly a residential access street. It is the only access for about 40% of the residents (400) of the Villages. It is their only route getting to and from their homes. The additional vehicular traffic, as well as supplier trucks to the convenience store and KFC, and one 65 foot tractor trailer gas truck per day can and will have a major impact on the citizens who depend on this for access. Add to this the addition of 1400 new homes from the adjoining Temeku Development without a prior condition of a signal at Yukon & Margarita Rd. At least 1/2 the cost should be borne by th developer of Palomar and Shell Oil. They are creating the traffic and should be part of the solution and pay the costs. NOISE: The developer has agreed to their own condition that noise levels will not exceed the current noise levels of Margarita Rd. A. What time of day? B. What days? C. Why are we talking noisy Margarita Rd. rather than the impacted Yukon? As we understand it, the addition of three decibles doubles the noise level. The developer says it will generate 9 ~ . decibels...the same as Margarita . Add the two, and the nois~ level is increased considerably. The only evidence they have is a noise study on a car wash conducted in ]991, and nowhere does it state that there was a car in the car wash when this experiment was performed. Car doors slamming, air brakes on trucks, speakers activated, music playing ..... these are all new additons to the residential area. LIGHTS: Our concern is that light and glare will have an impact on nearby residences. No corrective action for glare has been addressed. (Black concrete or asphalt?) The developer has offered to recess all lights. OUr question is: What does that mean? We want to see the evidence. The city should demand information to assure the citizens of what this is. A general comment shouldn't be part of the conditions. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: The Villages are responsible for the maintenance and safety of the Long Valley Flood Control Wash. Any spill or run-offs, etc. must end up in our wash. A condition was made for a catch basin. We want the fluids tested prior to release, or a bond with the city to protect the wash and the citizens with adjoining home sites. CHILDREN: There are three schools nearby. The children must use Yukon both coming and going as they walk to school. Add all this new vehicular traffic, 1400 new homes, and no signal and common sense tells you that the children's safety is imperiled. Sincerely, David Micheal, Presient of the Villages HOA ATTACHMENT NO. 3 MINUTES OF THE MARCH 13, 1997 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING R:~STAFFKFI'L~SPA~6.CCI 6/3/97 dwh '~ 4 OF T~ C1TY OF TEMECUL~ PL~[~G DIRECTOR MAR~ 1~, 1~ A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Director was called to order on Thursday, March 13, 1997 at 1:30 PM, at the City of Temecula Main Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Senior Planner Dave Hogan presiding. Also presem were Project Planner Ca,role Donahoe, Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley and Minute Clerk KeRi Beal. 1. Planning Appli~fion No. PA97-0028 f13~velopment PLY',0 Senior Planner Dave Hogan continued Planning Application No. PA97-0028 a Development Plan to construct and operate a single story, 9,928 square foot industrial warehouseoffice building for Kruse Microwave Enterprises to the March 20, 1997 Director's Hearing. 2. P!nnning Application No. PA96-0345 0')evelopment Plat0 Carole Donahoe presenmt the staff.,'~pon for a Development Plan to construct and operate a Shell automobile service station with a 648 square foot automated carwash, a 875 square foot convenience mart (without alcoholic beverage sales) and a Kentucky Fried Chicken 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service. Senior Planner Dave Hogan opened the public hearing. Larry Markham, Markham and Associates, 41750 Winchester Road, Temecula, representing the applicant S&L Oil. JV, concurred with the Conditions of Approval except that the service station was proposed for 24-hour operation. He also felt that KFC wanted their corporate logo in red and white. David Mayberry, 42055 Kaffuboom Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due to increased traffic. He sated the Village Grove HOA board was unanimously opposed. Richmond Jackson, 30450 Anaconda Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due to noise issues and safety concerns with the gas station and gas tanks so close to residential. Audrey Modonia, 30486 Danube, Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due to health and safety concerns, specifically related to gas, emissions, and vapors. lim Catapolis, 42075 Humber Dr., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due to concerns with pedestrians and increased traffic. Semor Rou BessIcy, 30605 Hollybeny, Temecula spol~ in opposition of the pwject due to traffic and access issues. He required if a Iraffic study has been done. He also expressed concern with safety issues with gas and leaky gas tanks and environmental issues. Marilyn Sawyer, 30443 Danube Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project with concerns with traffic and the lack of a tra2ffic signal at Yukon and Margarita. She expressed concerns with parking. David Michaels, 30300 Churchill Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project with concerns about traffic, safety and health issues. Frank Wagnon, 42180 Sweet Shade, Temecula requested a wall the same height as the trash enclosures and a berm with fasl growing landscape along Yukon Street. He expressed concern with safety, health and traffic issues. Planner Dave Hogan closed the public comments section. Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley stated a traffic study had been done in 1988 when the center was proposed. Project Planner Carole Donshoe stated an Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the General Plan in 1993. The applicant's representative Larry Markham responded to concerns: He stauxi that tanker truck deliveries would be as needed, probably one or two deliveries per week. The gas tanks are double wailed with monitors with leak alert going directly to the Fire Department. Mr. Markham stated the car wash recycles the water and the recycling umt is underground. He staled the car wash would not be operating 24 hours. Mr. Markham stated the applicant would not be opposed to building a wall with landscape clustered to prevent graffiti. He stated the Traffic Study was prepared in 1988 and the EIR was prepared in 1993 and they anticipated future buildout. He stated this is not a Light Industrial use. He stated the berming addresses the noise issue. Semor Planner Dave Hogan stated the traffic should reduce when the centers at Hwy 79 South and Margarita Road open for business. Lighting wiU be recessed lighting and will comply with the Mr. Palomar Lighting requirements. He stated a condition is to be added to require the location of trash cans be approved. Representative Mr. Markham concurred. Senior Planner Dave Hogan stated a condition is to be added that would add the wall to the south side of the berm along Yukon Street. He stated the red and white stripe on the top of KFC building would not be approved and he stated that the service station operation would be 24-hours. Senior Planner Dave Hogan adopted the Negative Declaration prepared for Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) and approved the project subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. The meeting was adjourned at ~:15 P.M. The next meeting will be held on March 20, 1997 at 1:30 ?M at the City of Temecula Main Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING OF APRIL 7, 1997 R:\STAFFRFI'k345PA96.CC1 613197 dwh 1 5 MINUTES OF A REGULAR lVll~..TING OF ~ CITY OF TEM~~ PLANNING COMMISSION APRI'I~ 7~ 1997 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order on Monday, April 7, 1997, 6:01 P.M., at the City of Temecula Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Co- Chairman Slaven presiding. PRESENT: Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster ABSENT: Fahey Also present were Community Development Director Gary Thornhill, Principal Engineer Ron Parks, Assistant City Attorney Rubin D. Weiner, Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner Dave Hogan, Associate Planner Matthew Fagan, Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley and Minute Clerk Pat Kelley. PUBLIC COM2MENTS Co-Chairman Slaven called for public comments on non-agenda items. There were no requests to speak. COMMISSION BUSINESS Approval of Agenda Co-Chairman Slaven requested Item 5 be heard after Item 6 as the proponents, who were from out of town, had not arrived. It was moved by Commissioner Miller, and seconded by Commissioner Webster, to approve the agenda as amended. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey Chairman Fahey arrived at 6:03 P.M. Approval of March 17. 1997 Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Miller, and seconded by Commissioner Webster, to approve the minutes of March 17, 1997, with the following amendments: Page 3, last paragraph, add Commissioner Soltysiak requested clarification that other developers would not be subsidizing this developer's infrastructure cost. R:\PLANCOMM\MINUT£S\1997\4-7-97.~IPD 6/2/97 vgw i p?,RNNTNG CO~fMTSSTON The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 NOES: 1 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Fahey COMMISSIONERS: Webster COMMISSIONERS None 6. Planning Application No. PA96-0345 - (Development Plan, Palomar Village Shopping Center) Commissioner Webster stated although his residence is in the adjacent area, he is beyond the conflict of an interest limit. Assistant City Attorney Weiner asked Commissioner Slaven to confirm she does not have any predisposition regarding how the grounds mentioned in her letter of March 25, 1997, may come out in this hearing. Commissioner Slaven stated she would make her decision solely based on the evidence presented in the hearing. Senior Planner Dave Hogan presented the staff report. Commissioner Webster asked if the requested uses are permitted or conditionally permitted. Mr. Hogan replied they are permitted uses. Commissioner Webster asked if a signal is planned for the Margarita Road/Yukon intersection. Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley answered no signal is scheduled at this time because the intersection does not meet warrams -- trip counts for Margarita Road, just north of Rancho California Road, were 13,500 daily as of July 1996. Principal Engineer Ron Parks stated the maximum allowable is approximately 20,000 per day. Commissioner Slaven questioned if the tanker trucks can safely enter and exit the facility from Yukon. Mr. Cooley stated the turning radii at the intersection can accommodate a tanker truck and Yukon was originally approved as a commercial collector street. Commissioner Miller questioned whether the loaded weight of 23 service tankers monthly will overstress the street. Mr. Cooley replied he does not feel this is a concern. Commissioner Slaven stated landscaping and driveway access will displace parking spaces and question the depth from the driveway property line to the landscaping area. Mr. Hogan answered it is about 15'. Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:45 P.M. Larry, Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, representing the applicant S&L Oil, JV, stated the applicant remains in concurrence with the Conditions of Approval as modified at the March 13, 1997 Director~' heating. He provided additional detail regarding lighting (1/4-foot candle at the sidewalk, and sufficie for the Police Department) and landscaping. He suggested the shrubs be moved to the outside of the buffer wall, and said the applicant is willing to make a right-turn exit only at the car wash to eliminate stop sign problems. Mr. Markham stated the applicant continues to request @ 24-hour operation for the gas station. R: \PLANCOMM\MIHUTE$\1997\4-7-99 .WPD 6/2/97 v~, 3 pT,~,NZ/T~G CO~'I~Z~;BT01~ ~ 7 · ~ 997 ~~ioner Slaven ~k~ if new ~s were pl~ed for ~e no~ side of ~e prope~. Mr. M~ repli~ five (5) or six (6) 24" box ~ndon Pl~n, tr~s, ~d pines, md shrubby, ~e pl~ed ~ong ~e w~l or ~. Mr. M~ ~gge~ ~ndition 6F be modified to put ~e l~dsc~e buffer ou~ide ~e w~l. Commissioner Slaven asked if the height of the canopy could be lowered. Mr. Markham stated lowering the canopy could restrict RV service. Commissioner Slaven questioned the need for the service station to operate 24 hours a day. Mr. Markham replied competing stations are presently open 24 hours. Joanne Boggein, 30591 Hollyberry Lane, representing the Village Homeowners Association, stated when driving a full size van, she has problems pulling onto Yukon with cars parked on both sides and questioned a tanker being able to make the move safely. She presented photos of businesses in the Palomar Center and Temecula illustrating tile roofs and small signage and requested any slanting or visible portion of the buildings be tile rather than metal. Ms. Boggein stated the Long Valley Wash could be a victim of hazardous spills and runoff and asked if Shell or the developer would post bonds for damages and health hazards to clean up the wash. She mentioned this is the first service station in a residential area. Barbara Michael, 30300 Churchill Court, representing the Village Homeowners Association, spoke in opposition to the project due to the increase in noise and light levels. Jim Contopulos, 42075 Humber Drive, representing the Village Homeowners Association, spoke in opposition to the project due to excess lighting created by a 24-hour operation. David Michael, 30300 Churchill Court, representing the Village Homeowners Association, spoke in opposition to the project because of an increase in traffic, noise, and lighting in the area. However, if the project is approved, he recommended the applicant pay half of the cost for a signal at Yukon and Margarita Road. He stated only one meeting was held with the homeowners and all attendees were opposed to the project. Sharon Mayberry, 42055 Kaffirboom Court, spoke in opposition to the project due to an increase in accidents and the safety of children on Yukon. Curtis Schen, 42136 Teatree Court, representing KFC and a Village Grove property owner, spoke in favor of the project and stated the restaurant manager is very conscientious and has addressed concerns raised by homeowners. Commissioner Slaven asked if it is anticipated that most of the customers will be drive-thru ones. Mr. Schen replied the business is geared for drive-thru traffic and he does not anticipate many dining room customers as they only have two (2) booths and seating for two at a counter. Commissioner Slaven expressed concem about customers crossing the drive-thru lane since a majority of the parking is on the west side. Mr. Schen replied KFC believes their customers will be from the gas station rather than the Center. He suggested signage might be helpful. R:\PLANCOMN\MINUTgS\1997\4-7-97.WPD 6/2/97 v.cr., 4 Frank Villirilli, 30371 Red River Circle, spoke in opposition to the project because of odors, accidents, and trailer truck noise. Peter Rathbun, 24399 Avenida Musico, Murrieta, representing the Village Homeowners Association, expressed concern the project is not meeting discharge requirements. He said rather than going into an approved concrete or underground system; the proposed storm drain system has been incorporated into the area's green belt. Mr. Pathbun stated that most car washes do not meet OSHA noise pollution requirements at significant distances from the blower/dryer assembly. Michelle Dawn, 41880 Humber, spoke in opposition to the proposal because of the loss of parking spaces and increased traffic. Gus Friedel, 42140 Teatree, spoke in opposition to the project due to landscaping restrictions in the Village Grove CC&Rs, which homeowners will prevent use of landscape material to block out noise. Katharine Lara, 42162 Sweet Shade Lane, stated opposition to the proposal because increased traffic will adversely affect those who like to walk/jog/run in the area. Mike Helfrich, 42144 Teatree Court, spoke in opposition to the project. Don Harper, 42020 Teatree Court, spoke in opposition. Debra Prentice, 30445 Shenandoah Court, spoke in opposition to the project because there is nothing to advance the village center concept; to the contrary, it creates additional vehicular traffic. In response to the concerns raised, Mr. Markham reiterated; 1) The traffic generated by this facility will be below the 5 % allowable range of additional impact. 2) The center has paid about $55,000 in traffic mitigation fees which should pay for half of a signal ar Yukon and Margarita Road. 3) He said double wall tanks with censoring devices which tie into HAZMAT will be installed and HAZMAT holds the developer liable for any haT~rdous spills. 4) The applicant offers to put in a chamber catch basin, which is an anticipated future municipa//industrial best management practice for EPDS. 5) The car wash has a clarifier system which basically recirculates the water; Eastern Water District will monitor for any violations. 6) Mr. Markham stated the planned tanker access is along Margarita Road onto Yukon, but a routing through the center is possible. He accepted the condition that no light spillage shall occur beyond the property line. He provided staff with a car wash acoustic study showing the dryer end, the noisiest area, will have a decibel reading of less than 75 at 30 feet. The developer will accept a condition that noise generated by' the car wash will not exceed ambient noise levels for Margarita and Rancho California Roads. Mr. Markham stated a complete pedestrian walking system around the site has been provided, and Lucky's has approved the project. He added the metal roof was dictated by staff to match existing buildings and the developer is neutral on style and open to modification. Mr. Markham mentioned the nine (9) existing trees along Yukon will be retained (the diseased ones replaced) and five (5) additional ones at about 20' spacing are planned, as well as some on Margarita Road. Commissioner Slaven asked how HAZMAT and the fire department were notified of hn?_ardous leaks. Mr. Markham explained an automatic alarm system, with a dedicated phone line to HAZMAT, issues such a warning. R:\PLANCO~'~4\MINUT£S\1997\4-7-97.WPD 6/2/97 vqw 5 UAIII~SCAP~F:.DJ AREA~-' ' / ~ ) . · ~. -~ I / 'mas~ i5' .Li~"IT ~-~"- ' "'" ' . ENCLOSURE __ . t ..-'--=. i : 21'-.4" / -1~l....0 '~,!IN.'~, ! ~t ~ > , ................ -%,', _: . ~.~ , ~ .. ............. ..-~,,, , .~~ ~o~:, '. "'""~':-- - R.~, ' ':.... / ~ ~ // , ~,~.~'~" ~.,~.~*.~' :'.'u .'~.~.. 1' ,~_,, .... :~..:~ .~.: ......-.;~.'.~p). - ~X~ ~ ,-, ~ ~..~ ~.~ .~ .~ ......,...~~L~ ~ , ,' ,/~ oL"'. - ' "":" .....:'""'~ ...."'~''' ~ V/_.~',[. ' ':"..'. '. .' .':~.~ / ' ,~ X ~. N r--~"" ' -''-'"~'"' """ :'"':'" :"~ '""~ ~ ~ ' ' · / ~, %'~:~._ //,. ~'~.. ~' ' ."- "'~:.,, ~ ~' ~ !i' !l.~ //, .~I~~ ~',.., ... · - ': ... , ......."'.:' -.' ,-':: '~::. ": .. ~ /,·~..~. ...,. .. .. _ ,...~..[ .1:~ , , , , ,. ,., .., . ., .. ... ., .. ,_. . .. . , .. . ,..:.,., ,, .... ~ ~.... .~' ."1.~ ..%""~,' 4, ~ t. ~ ~". ' ",~,.'-':~ '... -~ ,, · ~,--,~,:~~ ~ '~'; ~. :'~v'~" .''. ',' · ~ ' .' 1'- ' ~'"(" "' ' .'..' "' 'l-'.'l ~, ' t"~'~ · ' ' ~ *' '' ,I- -'' · , ' .... .' ~: '-" ' ' " ':' · gl''* ,* ~ Z~..%. t. . · ~.N.. · · : ,.. ~- · · · . -- ' '' * ~ '* ' ' ' ~*"-' * '' O" ~." .... ':%~, * .... / '~ %'; "'" ' . . , ' ..; ~.,:.:.~:"{~.~:.',.':~.:~:~.:.:~.,~.~"~','.:?...,~.'~.'..* . .,.... ..- .~,:..::, ....., .... ~ ....,..., , .... · .. .... . '. ,:. . ~ ~' ...'.~:,.'.:. .,,. ~ '.,,-:~,':..t~" ~'. . " ~ . "'.--/I.~=.':.'~: ',. :" -."..-':~.'.'"' .'..'-.,',~ :~'~- . /" " .q..S "..., ~' -"."..' ' ;...-; ' ',l':';.::>~.:'-::".':,....::.,::,:~'::'-.t"::, h:' ~:- ~~ ~ ' ~ '~." ' .t' : -. "', .b. "~'" ' " '-'' ',~ .-J~: ,?.'. ~: -'' / ' ,.~ ' .. % . - .... ... ~.. ~'. ~'-~ ,.-- · , '~' .~ -.~:.. ~,, = .... .,. . . . . . ~/ ... '-:.,.i...,:.:..~-,:.. -.~.'. ?,'~.:..':.~:..'.~. ' ..'~,.;~.'~. :/ · , . ,, . ::~ ~ -; .,, , ... :.'-.: ., .' · ~ · ,' ~ ' ,,. ' ' ~' >.·~ x72BL~~..,~4:.,.. ~.:, .....::.~' .~:~..,-..-.L:--. ~ , ,U .. OHIOKEN/~":::-:""~::i:::::~x~';'~;"0:q'::::~':?~~ ~ . -.... .,:,. ~ "~, . ..... ~- · .. . ~.'~ '-'':'"'~:: ' ' ~ · · ' .', C,. '.:";'z'? · ~ _. - .~ -',~:~ _ SNACK,: ."'...: .:,...-:,....,-GANOBY~-~.,.: 1,.:. :::.... ~:. _ , 2,520 ~.f...,., .......8 .~0 ~(!,..... , ~...~. -~ "~ .... :. ,~ .......s .... · .... ... ....~ .., · ~' :," ?: ...? U..::,.'..:::~~'.',.": '):,'.t;'~' :"~ :' , Attn: Carole Donahoe, Project Planner 4~200 Business Park Drive, P.O. Box 92589-903~ / FROM: Frank Wagnon 42180 Sweetshade Lane, Temecula, Ca RE: Planned nroject at S/W corner - Yukon and Margarita Our visit at your desk on 21 January 1997 DATE: 2~ January 1999 Carole, To confirm our discussion and to review my thoughts on this oronosed nroJect~ these are some of the concerns I raised. 1. Night !ightine, brightness disturbance 2.. Loudsneakers at all three nronosed business onerations Car wash machine noise h. 8' foot wall along Yukon - measured from the building grade Trash-litter from food wrappings blowing u~ Sweetshade Lane (C~rl's Restaurant) a~d small n!~stic styrofoam ~acki~g' ¥its are s freouent concern 6. Large !8 wheelers would come in on Yukon which would be noisey sod dabgerous to nearby'residents aroma 7. The sickicy'of fried chicken ~athing in boiling grease all day is narticularly disturbing I object to this oroject of gas station, car-wash, restaurant and fast food being located here at the edge of a residential ~rea. I would have little or no objection if the omonosed nroject were of a C-2 typw develonment le. nrofessional offlce~ port-littering, non-aromatic, non-noisey, non-bright or limited day-coeration. This is bad plan. Carole~ - Thank you azain for your courtesy apd your assurance thet this communication will get to the Planning Commissiop and will be given a fair and comnlete hearing at all conerned levels of our ciy ~overnment. T~r--8~']K wa gnon ~ 'rE~ECUt~ CA 92591 P.S. This letter may also contain names of others who endorse all or hart of this eoMmun:~ca ATTACHMENT NO. 7 SITE PLAN EXHIBIT R:\ST^F~SPA96.CCl 6/3/97 dwh 1 8 CITY OF TEMECULA I - -~ 1 ~, 1..-/f-T-~ ,-...o..~..,,~,.,..,~/ --~ -~'~ '1 ~1'~ .~ - -~. ~__~,~., ~-~ .... ~~?, E,-~ _ _~.. _ I I, ~ ~.~ ~ ~ , ~i ~.;~ / ~ I ~ ~'~ ~l ~-~ I I i ~ -. ~ ~. ~.~ ~ I ~ ~ / ' J . ~, ~ '/' / ~ ~ ~---~ /,, ~ ~ · .~ , .~.- -- ' ~ ~ /~ ~ I : J : ~'~ ~" ~ ' '" ~. ~ ,~. s _ SNACK : -~: ~ / . ,~_~ ~~ ~ ~ __~ i .,~~-'~ .~ ~ ) . , ~ k~ t~ ~. ~,~ ~ --- .,' .~ : ~ ~ ~1 ~-~.~ r.-/ / -- ',~ ~--- , ~~& /~ ~ d ll ~' ~t - ~-,- ~ ~ , '~~,~,~,,.-~.'~~ ,~ / i / . . x , ~ ~ ~{~~, .l~~/,~' ~l' '. ' ~ / . ~ / * J~' PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345 SITE PLAN FROM APRIL 7, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING CITY COUNCIL DATE: JUNE 10, 1997 ITEM. 20 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk June 10, 1997 Planning Commission Appointments APPROVAT, CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission. Appoint two applicants to serve a full three-year term on the BACKGROUND: The expiring term of Commissioners Marcia Slaven and Andrew Webster was advertised in accordance with the Council's adopted policy and procedure for making appointments and re-appointments. The applications received were forwarded to Mayor Birdsall and Councilmember Ford for a recommendation. Their recommendations are as follows: Mayor Birdsall recommends the appointment of Commissioner Marcia Slaven and Ron Guerriero. Councilmember Ford recommends the appointment of Commissioner Marcia Slaven and John Telesio. Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of May 27, 1997. ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment R:\agenda.rpt~a[Dpoint .I)ln 1 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMrrTEF~ .ND'I~OMMI~ION | · Qualification Requ,rement: Resident of the CRyof Tem~,w'~ PLANNING COMMISS IO~r BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: JOHN H. TELESIO YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA ! 7 ADDRESS: 31760 Via Telesio, Temecula, CA 92592 Voicemai l~P~ger: HOME PHONE: 909-676-7187 WORK PHONE~ 909-417-985n OCCUPATiON:Retired-USAF Officer and retired Assistant to County Supervis EMPLOYER NAME: EMPLOYER ADDRESS: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Bachelor of Arts, Social-Political Science, Calif. State University, L.A Master of Science, Systems Management, University of Southern California Master of Public Administration, Calif. State University, San Bernardino 21 additional professional development semester units, Chapman College LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: Charter Member, Riverside County Code Enforcement Task Force,19~7-1993 March AFB Community Council, 1980-1993 SCAG Regional Airport Authority, 1985-]993 ~ili~avy Affairs ~o~mittoe0. Greater Rivers~3Chambers of Comme,r~5~p~ Participated ~n original Temecula ~ncor~,or~on ~l~nn~n~ l~roce~s ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: ~rofe~siom~, ~ech.ic~, communiU, ser~ce): American Management Association American Society for Public Administration Air Force Association Active fn variety of youth acti-~'ities.'~nd'fm support of TV~4S l~ro~rams. BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO ~ERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC ggse paper h' neck'): Please see attached statement. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information fo%public information purposes. \,',, -,, PLEASE NOT~: A~plications will be kel~ o. file for ¢oasideration of fulur~ vacancies. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR Mail to: P.O. Box g033, Tomocula, r: \¢onums~appform BRI~LY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON TI-~S COMMISSION AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION: From 1985 through 1993, a span of time which included periods of both unprecedented growth and economic downturn in Riverside County, I served as an assistant to the Supervisors of two of the most dynamic districts in the County. Among my principal duties was the pre-application review, analysis and the formulation of recommendations regarding proposed development projects. I also served as liaison between the supervisors and the Planning Commission, the Economic Development Agency, the Planning and Land Use Agency, Flood Control, LAFCO and other county departments in helping to coordinate, guide and monitor the progress of selected projects through the planning process fi'om application to final disposition. From this practical experience I became quite familiar with the functions and procedures of these various players and especially those of the Planning Commission with which. I worked most closely. In addition, during this period, I earned a Master of Public Administration Degree with an emphasis in economic and community development in order to improve my knowledge, understanding and performance. I have attended many meetings of the Temecuia Planning Commission and have noted little if any difference from the processes and procedures I am familiar with at the county level. I feel that my education, background and experience would make my transition to a position on the City Planning Commission a smooth and efficient one. As a 17-year resident, I have witnessed and participated in the city's conception, birt~ growth and development as a proud citizen. During my 21-year military career, I experienced no less than 17 permanent changes of residence. When we came to Temecula, my wife and I knew that we had found a home. We have raised our family here and we are here to stay. We have a stake in this City and have enjoyed the benefits of life in the wonderful environment it has provided us. I would now like to take this opportunity do something meaningfial in return that wouid contribute to its continued growth and improvement. In surrmmry, I have the time, interest, experience , education, ability and desire to become an effective member of the Temecula City Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH 70 SERVE: CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES ~ I Qualification Requirement: Resident of the City'of Temecu~n ' ._._.....-.----I!~-- NAME: Pamela Ann Powel! ADDRESS: 44727-E La Paz, HOME PHONE: 909-699-1683 Sr. Judicial OCCUPATION: EMPLOYER NAME: Riverside County EMPLOYER ADDRESS: P- 0. B o x 1 5 6 9, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Please see attached YEARS RF.~IDENTOF TEMECULA .. Temecula, CA 92592 WORKPHONE: 909-245-3371 Office Assistant (Deputy Court Clerk) Consolidated Courts Riverside, CA 92502 resume. LIST ANYRIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED ANDTHE YEAR(~OFSERVICE: Riverside Economic Development Council 1990-~993 School District Liaison, School Improvement Plan Review Committee 1990-1991 ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professiomll, technical, community, service): California Court Clerks Association BRIEFLY STATEWHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU AREQUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECI~C ~ ~dit~n~ ~rffnecessary): I am really proud to tell people that I live in Temecula. ~cnose to move here 8 years ago after a divorce and have chosen to remain because I could not find a better quality of life in another Southern California community. I am an interested citizen and. have a desire to serve "my community." I believe I am amply qualified to serve on this commission. My education and work experiences have provided directly relevant background that would be applicable to issues, decisions and concerns that might come before this panel. (Please see attached resume.) I un~tand that ~y or ~ in~rm~n on ~ ~rm m~ he verified. I consent to ~e release of th~ / ' // . ~GNATUR~ -~'~"~ -'~Z~~ DATF: M~ 27, 19q7 PLEASE NOTE~. Apphc~io" ~ ~' m ~ be ke~ on fi~ ~£ co~ider~ion of ~ture ~cancies. R~urn to: Ciw C!erk's O~ 432~ B~iness Park Drive (909) 694-~~ OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 r:\commis~ppforrn PAMEI .A ANN POWEI.I. 44727-E La Paz, TemeeuJa, California 92592 H~ (909) 099-10B3 Education: University ot~ San Diego, Post Graduate Lawyers Assistant Certificate, ABA Approved; Honors Graduated December 1993, Specialty: Corporate, Real Estate, and Environmental Law University of Arizona, Tucson Palomar college, AA, RN. Special Licenses: Department of Real Estate, Sales Associate since 1977 (inactive) California Board of Registered Nurses since 1977 (inactive) Work Experience: 9/94-?resent RI'V-ERSIDE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SUPERIOR AND MUNICIPAL COURTS Senior Judicial Office Assistant 112/96 to present) Judicial Office Assistant II-Deputy Court Clerk (9/94 to 12/96) 6/04-12/96 TIERRA FINANCIAL Real Estate Sales Associate and Loan Consultant 1/94 to 9/94 LAW OFFICES OF CON]L4D, FRIDAY & WAGNER Paralegal; legal research, file management, client contact, calendar management, file review and office organization 6/93 to 6/94- MAIN STREET FUNDING GROUP, INC Loan Consultant 10/93 to 1~93- LAW OFFICE OF SEBASTIA2V DiAMICO Paralegal Intern; legal researcli, com-t search 9/90 to 9/91-FASTRAX DEVELOPERS SERVICES Regulatory. Compliance Officer/Land Use Consultant to PACTEL CELLLq. AR for cell site development 6/86 to 6/93-COLDWELL BANIx.~R, REALTY WORLD, and WEST COUNTY INVESTMENTS Real Estate Associate and Property Manager (Commercial & Investment) '**References and Complete Education Profile Available CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMIT rEF_.S AND COMMISS}ONS Qualification Requirement: 'Resident'of the City*of Temecula. ~ BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: RON GUERRIERO YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA 10 ADDRESS: 41510 CHENIN BLANC 92591 HOME PHONE: 676-6150 WORK PHONE: 695-6390 OCCUPATION: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY / HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRAINER EMPLOYER NAME: H E A T (hazardous emerRencv action training) EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 41510 CHENIN BLANC 92591 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: AA - SADDLEBACK COLLEGE, POLICE SCIENCE/BUSINESS BA CAL STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON, CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMIN. / SOCIOLOGY MINOR. CALIF. REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, REAL ESTATE LICENSE. CA. OFFICE 0F EMERGENCY SERVICES, STATE CERTIFIED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSTRUCTOR. LIST ANYRIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMH'FEE OR COMB41SSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED ANDTHE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: PUBLIC & TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION - SINCE 1990 Tk~ECULA/MURRIETA TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE - 4.5 yrs. SEVERAL AD HOC COMMITTEES REGARDING TRAFFIC. TEMECULA PUBLIC SAFETY EXPO COMMITTEE. ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SAFETY ENGINEERS. CEO/EXEC. BRD TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & wine. CA. POLICE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION. past pres./vice pres. BEARBACKERS TVHS PETROLEUM ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION. Past brd. member Temecula Town Assoc. BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paperifnecessm'y): Being a resisdent for 10 years, and very involved in community,youth groups, High School groups, and the Public/Traffic safety commission since our city incorporation, I feel very committed to its future growth. I believe I can assist knowledgeably in public safety, and traffic infastructure concerns. As a retired police ofcr. and current state contractor I understand the difficulties city staff encounters, and feel I would be able to lessen that undertaking through my interaction with the public. I also understand the time commitment of this position, and am willing to fulfill that obligation. I am extremely proud, and feel very fortunate to live in Temecula with all its attributes,and giving people, and would be honored to serve in its tremendous future. I understand that any or all information on this form may he verified. ! consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. PLEASE NOTE: Apphcatmns wdl be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: City C!erk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694~.~.~. OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Tomecula, CA 92589-9033 r:\comm~s~app£orm CITY OF TEMECULA ' MAY ~ J. J~g7 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COM~ffTT~ AN"~_ ~~1_~.~ 1 · ' Qualification Requirement: 'Resident of the City:of Temecula. ..... '. ~ ...... '~--' ~- /~ ik] i;4 i /~J~'~,/ /'~" ?'/~. I '5-:~ ~' BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: Michael S. Naggar ADDRESS: 43034 Agena At. 695-0324 HOME PHONE: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA 5+ WORK PHONE: 619-492-5084 OCCUPATION: Solid Waste Enforcement/Code Enforcment Officer EMPLOYER NAME: City Of San Diego Environmental Service Department 9601 Ridgehaven Dr EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Emergency Mediaca/ Technician P.O.S.T. PC 8.32 See attached for background LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: In my current position I work with various community groups in the neighborhoods which I serve. ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): Please See Attached BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): Please See Attached I understand thnt nny or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. k. · PLEASE NOTE: Al~plications ~il be ke~ on file fpr c6~ideration of future vacancies. Return to: CiW C!erk's Office, 43200 Business Park"Da~ye_ ~909) 694~.~.~. OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 5/21/97 r:\¢ommis\&ppform Michael S. Naggar 43034 Agena St. Temecula. CA 92592 (909)695-0324 hm (619) 492-5084 wk Council Members. City of Temecula C/O City Clerk P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 May 20, 1997 To The Honorable Council Members: Please consider my application for the upcoming planing commission vacancy. I am very anxious to serve the city, and offer the following history and qualifications lrbr your consideration. I have been in the real estate management and development field since 1980. During the mid 1980's 1 owned and managed one of the largest real estate management firms in the Torrance, South Bay area of Los Angeles. My firm managed over 200 apartment buildings and commercial space totaling over 2000 residential units, as well as 40,000 squar ft. of commercial space. In the process of management I have acquired land, participated in the construction of apartment buildings and condominiums, and have orchestrated the process from acquisition of land to residents moving in. During this period I was involved with several boards, and committees in the various neighborhoods of the properties I managed. In addition I was also a credentialed teacher for the City of Torrance Adult School: scheduled to teach real estate management. I have also been a candidate for the designation of"Certified Property Manager" with the Institute of Real Estate Management. a national organization recognizing management excellence. In late 1989, after much soul searching, I sold this business looking to change to a profession where I could focus on serving others. I moved to the City of Big Bear Lake where I became a Paid Call Firefighter. I also built a small cabin in the area. I then moved to San Diego where ! got married, and a few months later learned I was going to be a father. Knowing it was time to plant roots, I visited Temecula. 1 had past our town on the freeway frequently en route from Big Bear to San Diego. My wife and I fell in love with the city immediately and knew this is where we wanted to raise our family. I bought a home and have been living here for the past 5 years. Since then I have purchased another home and have now become a landlord. My roots are in/emecula as well as my financial future. Currently I am employed with the City of San Diego as a Solid Waste/Code Enforcement Officer with the Environmental Services Department. I have been with the City since 1993. I am familiar with state and local codes as to environmental issues, and what 1 don't know. I 'know how to find out. 1 also work part time as a Park Ranger for the Ortega Trail Park and Recreation District. I serve as a Soccer Coach for the TVSA, and have been a police volunteer. I am currentIv running for a seat on the Board of Directors for the Starlight Ridge Homeowners Association. I am thoroughly committed to this town. and want to be of service to it in the areas I am capable of. I truly do want to become a member of the Planing Commission so I can contribute to the planing and growth of the city I have chosen to live the majority of my life. I am committed to this town and to you as council members. Please consider me for this opportunity. You will not be disappointed. City of Temecula Planning Commission BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: John Joseph Stanton YEARS RESIDENT OFTEM~CULA ADDRESS: 27431 Senna Court HOMEPHONE: (909) 308-0091 OCCUPATION: Production Supervisor WORK PHONE: (909) 694-1695 / Shipping & Receiving Manager EMPLOYER NAME: Sunset Trails, Inc. EMPLOYER ADDRESS:43205 Business Park Drive Temecula CA 92590 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Harvard School of Architecture Summer Session 1991 Golf Course Design and Smalt. Harbours & Marina Design California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo B.S. Landscape Architecture 1990 qr~,4v Ahrn~d Proor.m; Pnrt~l~] & Spmin. Urban Planninm, Principals of Design LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNT~ OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMI1'FEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: This commission is the first which I have had the opportunity to serve. ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG:(Professional, technical, community, ~rvice): Hostellag International ( American Youth Hostels) - Volunteer Activities American Society of Landscape Architecture - Associate Member BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (U~ additional paper if necessary): Please refer to attached sheet. I understand that nny or all informalion on this form may be verified. i consent to the release of this information for public informalion purposes. PLEASE NOTE.y'Application~ will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: City Cierk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 1997 r:\comm~s~pp form As a resident and business owner in Temecula, I wish to serve on the Planning Commission to apply my education and experience to the service of our community and maintain the quality of life we enjoy in Temecula. I believe I am qualified for this position because of the planning skills developed at Cal Poly and the business skills developed as a small family-owned and operated manufacturer. Through hands on urban planning experience with cities such as Sacramento, working on their Downtown Redevelopment program, I was able to apply the principals of environmental design. The project allowed me the opportunity to apply my strengths in critical thinking in the development of a project statement and objectives through background and historical research. Within the context of their specific plan I was able to offer the Downtown Redevelopment Agency alternatives to creating a viable and identifiable downtown center that offered the community - residential, commercial and entertainment uses without loosing the identity of Sacramento as a city as well as a state capital. As a resident and business owner in Temecula I would be privileged to work with the Planing Commission to grow into the future with a vision of providing the residents and business owners opportunities for growth and maintain the quality of life we have come to enjoy living and working in Temecula. CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEF~ PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD, COMMIl~EE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: HAL ROZAKAS ADDRESS: 45596 Masters Drive HOME PHONE: 676 - 21 02 OCCUPATION: EMPLOYER NAN[E: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA 7 WORK PHONE: General Buildinq Contractor HR eONSTRUCTION COMPANY EMPLOYER ADDRESS: (same as residence) EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Architectural Design (Mesa College) Presently enrolled at California Babtist College (w~]] ~mp]~t~ my mamter's ~tudies in Rthics and Philosoph~ in 1999) LIST ANYRIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED ANDTHE YEAR(S) OFSERVICE: Certified Arbitrator for the State of California (Contractors State License Board) ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, National Organization for Historic Preservation BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional ~r~n~r~): Over 2,000 years ago, Aristotle observed that government came into existence to provide the basic needs for society, but its continuation is only jus- tified if it helps us to achieve a better life. While I make no claim to having solved the problems of achieving that goal, I firmly believe in taking an active approach toward community involvement and embrace the social compacts of our city. Since there was no job description attached to this application, I don't really know w~at is required or expected of a planning co~m%iss~ member. However, I look forward to talking with the appropriate powers that be to further discuss how my talents, skills and experience may best serve the needs Of Temecula. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for publi_~g.infot~ation purposes. PLEASE NOTE: A[~gi;.atmns will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. -- Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-~.~.~. OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Tomecula, CA 92589-9033 r:\commis\app form 'Qmdincaaon Requirement: Resident of the City of Temec~u~"~":~"-~-~- - .-.. ' BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: Marcia L. Slaven ADDRESS: 30110 La Primavera St. HOME PHONE: (909) 676 2507 OCCUPATION: Administrative City of EMPLOYER NAME: 450 E. EMPLOYER ADDRESS: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: AS Math & Science AA Behavioral Science YEARS RF. SIDE~ OF TEMECULA 2 2 WORK PHONE: (909) 765 2330 Secretary Hemet Latham Ave., Hemet, CA 92543 LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: Presently serving on the Planning Commission for the past three years. ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG:(Profess~nal, te~nical. community,~rvice): Municipal Managers Assistants of Southern California Community Association Institute Phi Thot~ K~pp~ Honor $ocioty BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECI~C ~ additional ~r ~ necessary): I believe that my length of residence here provides a good solid base of historical knowledge which can be used positively in the pursuit of well designed managed growth. My experience of the past three years on the Planning Commission and my constant involvement with community concerns prior has given me a broad knowledge base that will enable me to make good decisions on behalf of the community. I have thoroughly enjoyed my tenure as a commissioner and would like the opportunity to continue to serve the City of Temecula. I understand that any or all informalion on this form may be verified. ! consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. PLEASE NOTE: Applications willbe kel~ on file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694=~-~-~ OR Mail to: P.O. Box 9033. Temecula. CA 92589-9033 r:\comrms\appform CITY OF TEMECULA ~. ;~ ~.( '; '..' APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND'COMMISSI~)I~S ",i'/'- ~' . [[=~': ...... ii'= ~= . ' Qualification Requirement: Resident of the City of Temecula.= BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: /~-,~,4/~-'f7~ ~, ~ ~' YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA ~ ADDRESS: ~/'~ q'7 /O/O h/E~.O /~),g). '~,,n~A='~M/..~ ~--~ ~.~.~5"~.~-~ HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: EMI'LOYER NAME: '-"-- EMPLOYER ADDRESS: '"--- EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COM341TTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE: ORGA~ZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: ~rof~io~, techniC, communi~, se~ce): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): I unde~md th~ ~y or M! ~fom~ion on th~ fo~ may be verified. I cogent to ~e rele~ of thB informSion for public informSion pur~s~. P~ASE NO~: Appli~tiom will be ke~ on file for~e~ion of future va~ci~. Ret~ to: Ci~ C!erk's Office, 43200 B~in~ P~rive (909) 69~3 M~ to: P.O. ~x 9033, Tzmacula, CA 925~9-9033 r:\comrma\app form 85/27/1997 ],6:38 9E~J-506-B561 ,13K3Ti'ER -...i_ ., EDUCATZOI~AT~ BACII:GROUND/DF, GREES: LI~ Ah'Y RIVERSIDE C~ONTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMIITEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU RAVE SERVED AND THE YEAB~ OF gERVICE: ORGA. lq~-4,TIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG- (labor:- k~,-l, ! ' *,~.,,,4, mmmuni~', service): BI~n~'~'LY STATE WRY' YO~ 'WISH TO SERVE ON ~ BOARD OR COAJMISSION, AAID WHY YOU BEL1EV~ YOU ARE QUAI 1FlED FOR ~ FOSmOlq. BE SlqK3FIC COs, ~-Vr~k--.~ plim" if"- y): ~ m: l'.O. Bea: 90:~, Tom4oda, CA 9:~589 ITEM '21 APPROVAl C,T CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Ordinance 97- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: ~Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DIAZ ROAD 2) PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY 3! DIAZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD 4) RANCHO VISTA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY BACKGROUND: Engineering and traffic surveys have been conducted to update the posted speed limits on the roadway segments as shown on Exhibit "A". Section 40803 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that in order to enforce posted speed limits using radar, an engineering and traffic survey must be conducted within a five (5) year period. An engineering and traffic survey as described in the CVC, is a survey of the prevailing speeds, accident records and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the drivers. Based on analysis of the recent data, staff recommends that the existing speed limits remain the same and be re- affirmed by the City Council. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has reviewed the new engineering and traffic surveys and recommended that the City Council amend Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code to re-affirm the existing speed limits as shown on Exhibit "A". -I- r:~agdrpt\97\0610\spdlimit.ord/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. Exhibit "A" - Affected Roadway Segments 2. Ordinance 97- 3. Exhibit "B", Location Maps -2- r:~agdrpt\97\0610\spdlimit.ord/ajp EXHIBIT 'A" "Name of Street and Portion Affected Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and Diaz Road Pauba Road between Ynez Road and Meadows Parkway Diaz Road between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road Rancho Vista Road between Ynez Road and Meadows Parkway Declared Prima Facie Soeed Limit. Miles Per Hour 40 45 45 45 -3- r:~agdrpt\97\0610\spdlimit.ord/ajp ORDINANC£ ~?- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.25.010(d) OF THE TEMECI~A MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DIAZ ROAD 2) PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNt~Z ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY 3) DIAZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD 4) RANCHO VISTA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order to determine the appropriate speed limit; WWEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segments of roadways designated in this Ordinance indicate that the speed limit should remain the same and, therefore, the intent of the Council is to re-affirm the speed limits given the new engineering and traffic study. r:\agdrpt\97~0610\spdlimit.ord/ajp SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: "Name of Street and Portion Affected Declared Prima Facie Speed l.imit, Miles Per Hour Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and Diaz Road 40 Pauba Road between Ynez Road and Meadows Parkway 45 Diaz Road between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road 45 Rancho Vista Road between Ynez Road and Meadows Parkway 45 Except as specifically set forth in this Section 1, all other provisions of Section 10.28.010(d) shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ~ day of~ , 1997. -5- Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor r Aagdrpt\97\0610\~pdlimit.ord/ajp ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of June, 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regtdar meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of June, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:\agdrpt\9710610\spdlimit.ord/ajp LOCATION MAP SPEED LIMIT STUDY x~XHIBIT "B" ! $DJIY c 2 PA.~O B LOCATION MAP SPEED LIMIT STUDY EXHIBIT "B" ITEM -22 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII~AI~ , CITY MANAGER .'~.~ TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT City Council ~a~ Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director June 10, 1997 Request for Annexation of Redhawk by the Redhawk Residents to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff regarding the annexation for Redhawk and Vail Ranch communities, and if appropriate waive City pre-zoning, annexation and CEQA fees, and to pay all Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) annexation fees. BACKGROUND: In January 1997, staff received a petition supporting annexation from 121 Redhawk homeowners and requesting that this matter to be presented to the City Council. An updated request dated May 20, 1997 has also been included (refer to Attachment 1). The Redhawk and Vail Ranch homeowners have contacted City staff on several occasions during the past few years concerning the annexation to the City and TCSD (refer to Attachment 2). The Redhawk community is now formally requesting that the City Council initiate the annexation of Redhawk. Staff has also had several conversations with residents from Vail Ranch who seem very interested in annexing to the City. However, their efforts have been less organized, primarily because that area lacks a Home Owners Association. DISCUSSION: Both Redhawk and Vail Ranch are within Temecula's Sphere of Influence. Both communities are partially developed with single family dwellings, parks , golf course, and schools. The following are some of the factors that should be considered by the City before the initiating the annexation of these areas: Should Redhawk and Vail Ranch be considered for annexation, or at least pre-zoned, at the same time? Should all developed and vacant portions of the two communities should be annexed at the same time? (If the undeveloped portions of these areas are annexed, the City would have control over the expenditure of development impact fees collected here.) R:\STAFFRPT~P,.EDHANN.CC 6/419'7 m 1 Should all City application processing fees relating to annexation should be waived by the City_Council? Should the City pay for all LAFCO annexation fees? Should the City Council require the residents of both communities to demonstrate an overwhelming support for their annexation? (Staff recommends some form of community outreach program to both inform the residents and obtain the level of support for the annexation.) If the City Council directs staff to initiate annexation, staff will begin the process by beginning a community outreach program, the Pre-Zoning of the area, and preparation of the Plan of Services and the environmental documents. Staff would also provide information regarding fiscal impacts of the annexation including those to the TCSD and other City services, consistency of the project with the City's Annexation Guidelines, and existing entitlements and Development Agreements in the project area. FISCAL IMPACT: The immediate fiscal impacts of these annexations are related to City and LAFCO application fees and City staff time. The City fees for processing an annexation application is approximately $10,000, LAFCO fees are approximately 85,000, and staff time is estimated at $5,000 for a total of approximately $20,000. The only portion of these costs that the City would actually have to directly pay are the LAFCO fees. The actual fiscal impacts of the annexation of these communities will be determined by the Fiscal Impact Model after the exact area of the annexation is determined. Attachments: Redhawk's Annexation Request Letter - Page 3 Redhawk and Vail Ranch Land Use Maps - Page 4 R:\STAFFRPT~I~E. DHANN.CC 6/3197 sa 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REDHAWK'S ANNEXATION REQUEST LETTER R: ~STA FFRPTX,.RE~ HANN.CC 6/3197 May 20, 1997 Temecula City Council 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Friendly Annexation Of The Redhawk Community In January the Committee For Annexation submitted a proposal for your worthy consideration of a friendly annexation of the Redhawk Community. Included with the aforementioned proposal was a modest sampling of resident support. At the time the signatures were obtained the committee did not ascertain whether the signees were registered voters. We have subsequently determined from Riverside County that approximately 1200 ballots were mailed out for the CSA 143 vote. On this basis it can be assumed that three quarters of the Redhawk residents of voting age are registered to vote. It is-our sincere hope that you will be favorably disposed to our request for annexation and we are eagerly looking forward to becoming a part of and contributing to this wonderful community. The Committee For Annexation 45436 Via Jaca Temecula, CA 92592 January 7, 1997 Mr. Dave Hogan, AICP Senior Planner, Planning Division Community Development Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Mr. Hogan, JAN 0 9 !997 By This is in follow-up to my letter of December 26, 1996 concerning a proposal for friendly annexation of Redhawk community into the City of Temecula. The enclosed copy of request for friendly annexation of Redhawk community has been updated and corrected to reflect changes to estimated dwelling units from 750 to 810 and total number of existing parks from 2 to 1. Please substitute this copy for the drat~ that I sent you on December 26, 1996. I have also enclosed 11 signed originals of"Petitions for Proceedings," which contain a total of 121 signatures of registered voters who live in Redhawk. Thank you for your support. If you have any questions, I can be reached on (909) 676- 7484. Sincerely, Ronald F. Turco FRIENDLY ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY INTO CITY OF TEMECULA Purpose: The purpose of this briefing package is to provide information to support a request for a friendly annexation of Redhawk community-into the City of Temeeula. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California government Code (commencing with section 56000, Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985). The specific changes of organization proposed are: That the areas of the Redhawk Specific Plan, generally Iocateci south of Highway 79 and east of Pala Road, be annexed to the City of Temecula~ and that these same properties be detached from Riverside County Service Area 143 and annexed to the Temecula Community Services Dismet. The reason for this proposal is: To provide for increased service levels and a more efficiem response to service requests for the residents and property owners in the Redhawk area by becoming part of the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District, the nearest providers of municipal - type services within the County of Riverside. This proposal is consistent with the Sphere of Influence for the affected city and district. The area included in the request is inhabited by 12 or more registered voters. A copy of the Petition for Proceedings signed by more than 5% of eligible registered voters living in Redhawk is attached at TAB A. (Revised 1/4/97) History: The entire project site, now known as Redhawk, was originally purchased by the Great American Development Company for a raw land purchase of 1,270 gross acres for a price of $15,100,000.00. Actual developable area consisted of 580 gross acres. The Great American Development Company sold bulk lots to Redhawk (RDHK) Venture, the developer, and seven merchant builders in April 1989. RDHK Venture, a California limited parmership, became the master developer builder of approximately 970 gross acres. RDI-IK Venture plans to build 1,988 single family dwelling units, 1,299 multi family dwelling units and develop 13 acres for commercial use. The seven merchant builders bought the remaining lots located on approximately 300 gross acres to build 901 single family dwelling units. The majority of the tracts bought by the seven merchant builders have been fully developed. Redhawk has an approved Specific Plan and Development Agreement with Riverside County that provides it with entitlement to build 4,188 residential units, including detached, attached and apartments. Redhawk has a land use density of seven dwelling units per acre. Planned infrastructure and major public improvements have been completed, in accordance with Specific Plan 217 as administered by the County of Riverside, for the entire project. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Redhawk Community Association were recorded for the record in Riverside County on June 14, 1989. Background: Location: Unincorporated area of the Southwestern portion of Riverside County, east of Interstate 15 and south of the intersection of Highway 79S and Margarita Road. Land area: 1,270 13 182.7 692 gross acres (580 developable acres) planned for residential use gross acres planned for commercial development gross acres described as Redhawk Golf Course gross acres of land conveyed or offered for dedication to a public agency or owned by Homeowners' Association, public rights of way, unmanned utility properties or any public or utility easements. Market value of land as of July 25, I990: $144,600,000.00 (appraised value using a discounted cash flow developmental analysis). 2 Estimated number of dwelling umts at build out: Residemial Units Single family $150-245,00.00 Multi family: (Condos & apartments) $121-150,000.00 Total Range in size of units: Lot sizes: Range in cost of units: Master Developer/Builder: Tract Map Nos: Gross acres: Number units: Merchant Builders: Tract Map No: Gross acres: Number of units: No Planned 2,900 1,200 4,188 1,800 to 3,300 square feet 5,000 to 7,200 square feet $121,500 to $245,000.00 Redhawk Vemures 23064, 23065, 23066, 23067 970 3,287 Seven 23063 300 901 30 100 Completed to date 810 0 810 Infrastructure: Miles of paved roads: Street sweeping No. square feet of slopes, parkways, medians, turf grass and park: No. of street lights: Solid Waste and Recycling Services: School district: Fire Protection: Police Protection: Library: Parks: 26 12 times per year Riverside County Contract (CSA - 143) Cost $4,683 per year 1,298,277 square feet Riverside County Contract (CSA - 143) with Adame Landscaping Cost $165,700 per year 272 lamp poles Riverside County Contract (CSA- 143) with Southern CA Edison Cost $32,000 per year 810 dwellings Riverside County Contract (CSA - 143) with Waste Management of Inland Valley Cost $143,250 per year Temecula Valley Unified School District Redhawk Elementary School, Camino San Jose Station 84, Pauba Road Sheriff's Department, Riverside County Riverside County, Temecula Branch 4 Special Assessment Districts and Other Taxing Agencies: Taxing A~encies County Service Area - 143 (CSA - 143) Landscape maintenance of public areas and Redhawk signature fountain Street lights Street sweeping County Service Area - 143 (CSA - 143) Solid Waste and Recycling Services Elementary School Debt Service Riverside County Assessment District No. 159 (AD 159 Mello Roos) (Supplemental Rancho Villages) State Highway 79S from Tract 20319 at imersection Pala Road and Highway 79 east to Butterfield Stage Road. District was formed to finance construction of: sewer lit~ station and force main, sewer trunk main, natural gas main, Butterfield Stage Road, Margarita Road, Wolf Valley Road, Wolf Valley Loop, sewer improvements dePortola Road, realignment and channelization of Temecula Creek, additional traffic lanes in Highway 79S, bridge crossing Temecula Creek at Pala Road, flood control facility in Pala Road to Temecula Creek and additional traffic lanes along east entrance and exit ramps of the I-15 intersection with State Highway 79S. Temecula Valley Unified Services District, Community Facilities District No. 89-1 (CFD 89- 1) (Redhawk Me!lo-Roos Project). District was formed to finance a portion of the direct costs of developing public facilities for Redhawk. Facilities which may be financed by CID 89-1 include schools, reclaimed water facilities, landscaping and day care facilities. Water debt charges Annual Cost/Dwelling $114.00 191.00 195.00 497.00 726.00 257.00 Metropolitan Water Debt Service Eastern Municipal Water Debt Service Rancho California Water Division debt Service EMWD Standby MWD Standby East Flood control storm water/Clearwater Total Special Assessment Districts Cost (67.00) (69.00) (98.00) (12.00) (?.00) (4.00) $1,980.00 Paid by Homeowner on an Annual Basis Homeowner Associations (I-IOA) Redhawk (all 810 homes) Rancho Serrano (120 homes located in gated community within Redhawk) HOA fees pay for maintenance of six slopes located in common areas of six developments in Redhawk. Also residents of Rancho Serrano, a gated community within Redhawk, pay an additional HOA fee of $552.00 year to maintain interior slopes, streets and entrance/exit security gates. ,Annual Assessment $360.00 $552.00 6 reclaimed water system fire hydrants All improvements were completed in accordance with Specific Plan No. 217 as administered by the County of Riverside. Development of Redhawk community is a legal conforming use under the Specific Plan. Therefore, annexation of Redhawk should result in no additional infrastructure cost to the City of'Temecula. 8 PRINTED NAME MAIL~G AIX~ESS ;ach of serf or ~erse# states: I have ptrsonsliy affixed my ow~ siOnSaute to Ihls betlibrL pu-'riher, I am on e~i& room·red vot~ the County of Riverside. ¢all~omJ~ at the time of signinO and I hove correcUy wr~tee my plm:e o! residence heroon (for registered voter 1:,atelions only). R~SIO~NCG means a number and street lidroll or description suffk:Jent for the Registrar of Voters to ioc·te property off · map. Post Office Ix~x hUmp·rs or rome numbers CANNOT BE USED AND Wit· NOT BE ACGEPTED. We ceilday we are registered voter· (or landowners, for · landowner peal·loft) of the arab de·crJlMcl in the attached map end we underuLund that t~es~inne may not be cftcneared ·eperotAly from a current description of the area involved and 4 current map showing the oreo involved. "-"-"-""-- ,.~GN 14AMk PHINI ~E F~l~rl' NAME PRI~ NAME DAIk JAil,- .~e~L,~d~ ALX,~e..5~. (AJ-'N ~ L3reowam ~:i:~,L~_f~.b A&A.~Ir...La~ (A~N For L~ncJmm~ laelfoo~ ~<~..~lL~ AL.Y~IE,%5 (;dan Fm ~ Pe~m~n) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained) I am registered to vote in the County of Riverside, California. I circulated this petition and ·ew each of the appended signatures on this petilion. being written. Each aigne~re on this petition is, to the best of my information ar .J~,.,.~o~Jef. the genuine signature of the person.Whose name purports to be. All signatures on this document were obLlined between //-- //.~-'~' . and // /!s0 ;":, i cert,y under penalty or perjury under the Laws o! the State or ColafataL· that the foregoinO)~tnje and corr~f~ / / / Signlaura Primed Name {incrude mklcl~e initial} Residence Addreee City State PAGE 2 of 2 Wherefore, petitionerIs) J~luost(e) that prscoedln~ be take. In .cconfenco with the p~wf-in~e of Section 84000, et seq.. of the Government Co~a and horswl~ ellix signatures(s) os lollawe: THE CHINA~ P~nTIONERS OF ~ PROI~SAL ARE: INet to exceed threa) PRINTED NAME MAILJNG AIXJRE$S ~sch o se# or herJeff states: I have IMrSonalty affsxecJ my own signaCura to this petition. Further, I am an eligble registered voter o~ the County of RivenMe, C&lffomis at jiu lime or signing and ! have correctly written my place of residence heroon (for register~S voter petjilofis only). I~SID~NG~ means · fi~mber end street oddMss o~ deecrll}tlon sufficient for b Registrar of Voters to Jocate proJ~rty on a map. Post Office box numbers or route numbers GANNOT B~ USED ,e~fD Wll.k NOT BE ACCePTeD. We certify we are registered voters (or tendowners, for 8 landowner petJiM) of b ars8 descrjiMd In the attached map end we understand II~t thes/O.'lMtitions may not be circulated Selmretely tram a current description of IIM area Invoked and · current map showing the area Involved. ~. .,.~.~ ))~,~d~ j ////// ~ JO-'7~.'.:.';~'"4:...,':t:~-~l~. :,:t.?fr'~,.. ..-7-7~. :.--. .-~,., .,.,. , w - . Te-'::/ /" / 7-o - DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To ba completed after signatures have been obtained) I am registered to vote in the County of Riverside, ¢alJiomla. I circulated thla petition end saw each of the appended slgn&turs8 on this petition belf~- written. Each ,tgnature on this petition la, to the best O! my kllormatiOll end bella,, the.genuine signature o! t~l//~% wh0$e name pt ~,to IM. All signatures on thl~ document ware obtained between /~--/C/ /191 ~/' , and -- 109 ,~ I ¢ ~Jnder penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of C&ljiomla that the Iorsgoin0(.J~/true end corrscL /~--~, // Signatur~ Printed Nam~ (Mclude mlcMla initial) ReJid~nce Addra~s City Slate PA~E J of J Wherefo~, puimon.~o) ~-.rd4stie) IMt proem4,..~'- and herswit offlz slgnotures4s) os Iolinws: PRINTED NAME 2. ~e Co~ of R~e~. ~lomh st b ~e of s~n~g end I ~ve ~ w~ my pb~ of res~e he~ (for Mgbte~ voter ~s on~ ~NG~ means 8 numar ~ s~t ~dms8 or ~sc~ su~bnt ~ ~ R~r of Vote~ M ~M pm~ ~ 8 map. Post 0~0 ~x num~ or ~ num~ ~NOT BE US~ ~D ~ ~T BE ~ ~ be taken In accordimam wit le Iuuvlslono o'/' %t- Icm ~400Q, el seq.. of the Govern~,t TI~E CHIEF PETTr10NERS OF THIS PROPOSAL AJqE: ~1ot to exceed mine) Id~l. JNO IId3C~ES$ We certify we are registered voters {or Ian~;Jo?,~l.~'~l landowner petition) of the am described h the attached map and we understand that ~ese .pellticms may no~be cl.n:ulat.ed se~r~a current Cleacrtptlon o! the area involved arid a current map showing the area invo~ed. l DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained) I am registered to vote in the County of Rlveriide, C&lifomL-. i circulated this IMtltJon and IeW each of the aPlMnded sJgnattJres on this betn;~ wrillen. Each signature on this petttidn h, to the best or my information and belbf, the genulr~ signature of the person whose name pUrlDOffS to ~:)4. All Signatures on this document were obtained belwe, an · ~',~./~---,:,('~; 100 ~, . and , /U~. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State or Call(orals that h foregohg is true and corre. cL~ _~__ '~'//~'"~ ~/' ('~/~/%'6/ ~S~-././. sure ~'~- :'tinled Name (include mlclclle klitial) ~'~" ~'~'~'/'~/~ ! Residence Addree~ C~/' State PAGE 2 of 2 ~ot m exe~ ~) PRI~ NM ~NO ~e Coun~ d R~eo~ Oafflash at ~ ~ of s~n~g e~ I ~o ~ ~ my p~ of restnee h~n flor ~te~ voter ofi~ ~S!~ mo.~ · n~r a~ smt ~Ms8 or desc~ s~bnt br ~ R~r of Vote~ M ~te pm~ ~, took Post O~e ~z ~mM~ or ~ numM~ ~NOT BE US~ ~D ~ NOT ~ ~ We certify we &~e registered voters (or isndowners. for · landowner petJtkm) of ~h4 am deKrbod in ~e a~tJch~J map and we unclersLund that the~edpeUtJona may not be circulated separately from · currunt clescrlpticm o! t~o ifil in¥o~fed I~d · curTent map showinG the er~a Isysired. DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained) I am registered m vote Jn the County of Riverside, C&b~omL-. I clrcuistod this petition and saw each of the appended aign&~res on thh petition being wrifierL Each signature on this petition is, to the best or my informaiM end b~liif, the genuine sionature o! the person whose n~me it ,purp~ ~,be. Ait signatures on thls document ware obLuined between ,.~.p;trd..Z.~, llO~ , and -J,..~/'~, /~,/ J car. :Jar penaffy of perjuly under the LlWa of the Still of California that the foregoing ~ tfiJe. Jnd coFrecL / Signature )rinled Name (include middle initial) Residence Address '~lty / Shill Zip PAGE 2 of 2 ~ecn o('ue lee ramseft or nerue# 0rates: I ~uve peruonelly eff,-e4 my ow~ o~gf~uJre to thh peruton. Fum~er, 6 am on ei~it)t. reg~teroa voter o~ the County of RIvemhM, ¢ol#omb at ~ ~l of o~nhg 8~ I ~ve go~ ~ my p~ of ms~e ~n (for ~lsto~ voter ~o on~ ~S~CE me8~ 8 ~m~r 0~ sU~t ~dms8 or des~tM 8~bfit ~ b R~r of Voters ~ ~lt pm~ ~ i map. Post ~0 ~E numM~ or ~ fi~ ~NOT BE US~ ~D ~ NOT BE ~ We cefi~ we a~ ~g~Mr~ voMrs (or ~~. br 8 bnd~r ~) of h ~ ~K~ ~ ~ m~c~ m~ and we unde~ ~t ~es4 .~fft~s may not ~ ci~MI~ 8~rate~ f~m a cur~ desc~ of ~ oreo bvo~ a~ · cu.ent map 8~hg ~e a~a ~vok~ DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained) I am registered to vote in the County of Riverside, ¢&lifomlL i circulated this petition ond sow each o! ~he eppended aigneture$ on this petition b~Ing wrifien. Eech signature on this petRion is, to the best of my informetlon and belief, the genuine e~gneture oftf)e person whose name I~-' putperil to b4. All aigno~Jres on this document were obtained behveen Jo,,.,~ .~.) 199 /'~ . end z/o,4~ ~_-~ 199 ..~ I certify under penalty or perjury under the ~wa of the State of Cliffemro thot the forK~ true end correct. 2,,/ ""--' Signetufo 'rinted Name (include tolddie initial) Residence Address CI~ State Zip PAGE 2 of 2 ' ' ' be Mke~ In f~cofdoaou wills tim IMUvisloao ~ '~ ~, el ~. of ~ ~e~,t ~e ?,_ CHIEF P~11I~S O~ ~ ~0~ ~ PR~ N~E ~0 ~ESS ~ocn oi us ior n~se~ or ~ff sams: t ~e ~ ,a~ my o~ .~mm u ~ ~m~ Fu~r. i am on el~m f~M~ vomr od ofi~). MS~N~ m~8 a numar ~ I~ut ~ll Or desC~ sugar ~ b RMhUr of vo].~ ~ ~t. pmM~ ~ · ml~. O~o ~z numM~ or ~ n~ ~NOT H ~ ~D ~ NOT BE ~~ ,_ Printed Name (include m~dl~ inithr~ Relk[ence Address C~ S~IE ~p PAGE 2 of 2 Ice, rider penalty of perjury under me S-ws of ms SLuts of C&llfomis mat the fomgoing~s ~e and correct. ~ E.~.,ed., ~-~ ~"- . cA o,, ,./,,.,..,.~ /~' .,,6. -./(-~,,,~ .,4-/,.~ beings,irE=fl. Each lign4ture on aim petition is. to the best o! my Inforrna( _k)n and boiler. the genuine sign,tture of put o1~. Allslgns~resonmisdocumentweraobtainedboeween 4~/(,M,q~_ /.) lll..~,ip.~., and DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION CTo be completed =tier sign=tures h=ve been obtained) I am registered to vote in the County of Riverside. C&lJfomie. I circuLutnd thll PetlfJon and iiw each of the appended signatures on this petition end hemwith ef~ eig~m~e(a) is ~: "-~, ~ ~ ex~ ~) me Co~ ~ K~e~ Clhml it ~ bl Of I~ ~d I Mve ~ w~n my p~ of ms~e M~ (for ~teM voter on~ ~S~NCE me~ a n~r ~ s~Nt ~N88 Of des~t~ s~bnt ~ ~ A~b~r of Voile ~ ~to pm~ ~ a map. Post O~* ~z n~ or ~e num~ ~NOT BE US~ ~D ~ NOT ~ ~ We certify we are registered vol. rs (or inndowners. !or I ~r ~) of ~e a~ ~sc~ ~ ~ a~c~ map a~ ~ ~e~ ~1 may not ~u~l~N~tt~ from a ~nt desc~n ~ ~ area ~vo~ a~ a cu.~t map shrug ~e ams ~vo~ ~0. ~ ~ . II, I . ~1~ .... DECLAP, AT]ON OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have bHn obtained) I am registered to vote in th~ County of Riverside, California. I clrcutatod this petlUon and saw each of the appended aigrmturee on this petition brairig w~itten. Each sigrmmre on ~hll petriion is, to the best of my informst!~)~l end belbf. the genuine signature of th~ person wh~ose name Jt -- pu~rls Io be. All signatures on this documenl were obta~ed behveen ,/0,4..~ :~-/~-.-1tl ~:~ . led ~' /~-),~ /-- / ~ ¶IS ~ I certify under p~nalty of perjury under the isws of the State of Callfomil that the fomgoing"Ti'l~e end corzect, /2.,,~ __ ~ S~nsture Printed Name (include middle initia0 Reek:lance Address Ctty State Zip PAGE 2 of 2 ~e Coun~ ~ R~e~ Ca~omh it ~ ~e of s~n~g ~ ! ~vo ~ w~ my ph~ ~ msb~ ~r~n (for ~hte~ voMr ~lll~8 on~ ~SI~CE me~8 · numMr I~ s~t ~m88 or ~sc~ subfit br ~ R~r of Vote~ M ~te pm~ ~ 8 m.~. Post O~e ~z numM~ or ~ num~m ~NOT BE US~ ~D K NOT BE ~ We cefil~ we are ~giste~ voters (or ~~, br 8 ~r ~M) of be am desc~ ~ ~ 8~ mip Ind we ~en~ ht ~ese .~i~n~y not ~ ci~u~t~ seMmte~ f~ 8 cu.~t desc~t~n of b ires hvo~ ~d a cunent m~ uh~mg ~e 8m8 ~vo~ DEClARATiON OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained) I am regislered tO vote in !~e County of Riverside, California. I circulartel this petition end saw each of the appended signatures on this petition heine -'oifien. Each signature on this petEion h, Is flue b4at of my bformaUo9 and bobf, the genuine signature of ~e whose name # put ~ b4. All s~natures on thh document were obtained b4tween i~'~.~,c/~// 100 ~ om:J c-/~/~r~°fi/( 100 ~-~ . I co. ~der penalty of p~rjury under the laws o! the State of ¢&l~romfa that ~ ror~oing Re and correct. / Printed Name (include mk:ldte inillar) Resk:Jence Address PAGE 2 of 2 Signature SLate Zip Wherelorn, I~dlJonI4S) raiNsaKs) Ore( procar · ~d helmwith ~ signllums(s) M ~ THE CHIEF PLrTTTIONERS OF 11dIS PROPOSAL ~ ~ Io exceed Sirroe! PRINTED NAME MAILING AJaRESS the County o/Rlvento~ ¢llltomtl II the lime of sioJIIng Ind I Imvl cofNc~ wfllle my piles of relll:ldNv~ hemon (for registered rotor pBIItlof~ only). RES#~NCE mear~ · number mvl street idamss or description ·ufflcimn( for the Registrar of Vc4er8 to Iocato probefry off, meG. Post Office box numbors or route numbers rAIdNOT BE USEZ) AND WI.L, NOT BE A~.Bl-lr.u. We certify we e~e ~glsto~d voters .,.y not b,_ ~. ~ ,~ ~ ~ . .~. ._~ v~ ~, -c,~,=..., ~ .... ~ / 11. 3Alic /, -// DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION ~1'o be completed after signatures have been obtiined) I am reglslered to voto hi itel County of RJvlrslde. Callfomla. I ciKulilecl thl~ petRion Ind IIW lath of the Ipl~fided slgnitUml on thll petit·off being writtan. Each siormture off this petition is, to Ihl best of my irlformat~pn and belj4f, the genuinl signature of thai P4rsQ,-whose name purlx)r~s to be. All signalres on ~is document were ob*-,k~ld belw~erl &./~.)'~/~ / 191 & , Ifld ~../~,,~./G,, /// 111 ~__. I certif~ under penalty of perjury under ~e Llwl of the SL~ts of C·11fomla that the fomgol'~ true and correct. Prinled Name (include m~dle initial) Signitum Rilldents Address City State PAGE 2 of 2 MAJLINO AIX~ES$ i~cn ~1 us tot turn·ell or Its·ell'sUm: i tuwe Pelf·hilly mfflAed my o~ia sig/mlum Io mi~ I)~t~gm. Furll~r. iem on eligd)ll rogiilef~ v~ ~]~ We County o4' Riverside, ¢&lffomll at lbs time of signing 8fid I have corystay wdfiml my piece of residence be·on (for resistarid voter petitions only). RESIDENCE means m number arKI $l~o4t oddrs# or deicdpUolt sufTIghnt br ~ RogJ~tmr of Volers Is k)cate pro!Mrq off · mop. Post Ofi'k:a box noraMrs or rome numbers CANNOT BE USEZl AND WILL NOT BE A~EPTE~. certify we ere rtOistered voters (or landowners, for · J~ldownir petltJMt) of b ired descrJbe(f in lite eltoch~d map arid we u~derstand that I~eae 4Mtl~lons may not be cin:ulted S·lMritely from · current description of ~te at# Ilwoived m~l · curtant map showing bte erie involved. ~,~ ....... ' ' ~ ~ ' ~' , '. -,i" - .... ' '~-' ' ~-~ ~, ~ /d. ' ~,, ~- -~ ~ f i . ..T,~,-~ ~ u l~ c ~ _,....e ~, ~-~ ~ ~ .~ --~ -~ ~ DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained) I am registered to vote in ~· County of Rivereld·, C·lifomlL I circulated I~Js IMtltJon and sew each of ~o appended signatures on ~is PetitJori pu, ',~be. AIIslgnsturesonmlsdocumentweraobt, uinedbetwoe. /~/~ /...~ 1#~.__, end :'~'f2"~[Z. ,~'- . ~Prinled Name (Include m~dLo initial} Signature Res~ence Address C~ S~te PAGE 2 of 2 Whefelom. pllJ#Mtmde) met(el IhiI F4IIi lion IIO00. et ~ of ere Government C~i ~ hMIWNh Ifib eMnItUfe~(8) N Ioimis: PRINTED NAME THE CHIF Pl:.,,~ IIEP. I OF lWS PROPOSAL ARE: Mot to era:M4 Imie) MMJIG ADOREIS inly not Be cl/gUlitia lelIIrliely hem · currefit discrip#off of Ihe &fel involved Ind I CUITIfit rail) 8howlng the &fee kwolved. DECLARA~ON OF ClRCULA33ON (To be completed Ifter slgniturts hive blln obtiined) I im regiaterod to VOle in h Colff~ly Ot Riverlb, ClEoml. I eif~ulAIod 11~lA pMJtlo~ Mid law IlCh 01 b IppllM$ld Iigrlltufel on Ihh I~tJtJoa being wrifien. EIch ligature purports to b.. All i~nemfel 2 Ih~ petilion k, t0 Ihe best o! my klformitkNt I~niture of lb. I)4[~ofi w. hose nIme I Ihli document were oMoined belwein Z- 8nd bl~l, h O~uine I certify under penalty o! p~rju~ under the laws of Ihe SIAM of ColfromMIbl foreook~ k 7Fe Ind correct. /.., .,,, :t' a co . . !Printed Name (include middle initial) Residence Addfell City St411 Z~ PAGE 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 2 REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH LAND USE MAPS R:\STAFFRPTXREDI'IAI'qlq. CC 6/3/97 m 4 i Bulltdiehl $1&$e ,,,'., // ,f' .... ";;' .,.: , /. I i, <Z < ~ pT,i~NNTNG COI~MTSS?ON Chairman Fahey questioned the impact if the car wash was not part of the project. Mr. Markham replied the applicant typically has a car wash facility with his stations and the project would probably not go without the car wash. Commissioner Miller asked how much noise will be heard by a neighbor 100 yards from the car wash. Mr. Markham replied the noise will be below the ambient noise of Margarita Road, and he will accept a condition the car wash shall not be within 200' of a residential zone. Commissioner Soltysiak questioned timing of gasoline deliveries. Mr. Markham replied deliveries in a peak season occur about 23 times a month and typically in the evening, but can be tailored to whatever is required. Commissioner Miller asked if a right-out-only rum from the car wash wouldn't make traffic worst because traffic is then forced to exit on Yukon. Mr. Markham stated he did not see exits from the car wash as a major concern. Chairman Fahey called for a recess at 8:18 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:29 P.M. Commissioner Webster asked why Mr, Michael only received a copy of the general plan. Ms. Ubnoske stated, staff xeviewed traffic and noise impacts and determined the project is consistent with the General Plan's traffic study, which was done for the entire city. Mr. Hogan stated a negative declaration was approved by the County when the Center was built; staff reviewed the General Plan EIR which address' impacts. He also advised that Mr. Michael will be given a copy of the initial study. Chairman Fahey stared her thoughts are: this use is allowed at this location; the developer has attempted to mitigate any adverse effects; she and she would support the project with the following additions: no lights spill past the properly lines; tankers to come thru the center at a time having the least traffic impact (staff to determine); a chambered basin is to be installed; The car wash acoustic impact will not exceed ambient standards; staff directed to determine if it is possible to lower the canopy height; operating hours shall be 6AM to midnight; and increase the size of trees on Yukon, with a majority being evergreen. Commissioner Webster stated a tile roof is inappropriate as the other buildings have metal roofs; and shrubs should be placed outside the wall. Commissioner Slaven said her comments are: The design is not in the best interest of the community or people living in the vicinity; she supports the lighting/noise-impacting-homes arguments; and are not certain the guarantees are enforceable; The existing landscape was put in to mitigate noise, but according to residents doesn't; The design does not allow for ease of use; is not pedestrian friendly; does not include any of the village concept ideas; and should not be a 24-hour operation. Commissioner Soltysiak stated his thoughts are: the project is consistent with the General Plan; internal traffic congestion relates to Lucky's, and the Lucky's and Albertson Centers being built to the south should relieve this area. Commissioner Miller said a gas station will meet the auto needs, homeowners and he supports the project as it in compliance with zoning. R: \PLA~CO~q\HINUT~$\1997\4-7-97.I4PD 6/2/97 vgw 6 Mr. Markham reiterated the applicant is agreeable to amended conditions except for the hours of operation as the station works most efficiently on a 24-hour basis, with maintenance, upkeep and cleaning being performed in the early hours. Chairman Fahey stated she cannot support a 2,C-hour operation based on the noise impacts on the surrounding areas. It was moved by Commissioner Slaven to deny Planning Application PA96-0345 based on the best interest of the people in the area due to negative impacts to their health, safety and welfare, and because the hours of operation exceed midnight. The motion died for lack of a second. It was moved by Commissioner Miller, and seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak, to approve Planning Application PA96-0345 as previously conditioned at the March 13, 1997 Planning Director meeting and as augmented tonight-i.e, no light spills past the property lines; installation of a special catch basin; acoustic impact not to exceed ambient parameters; canopy height to be as low as possible and still accommodate vehicles; trees to be 24" box, of an evergreen majority, along the properry's perimeter; shrubs to be located outside the wall; if a left-turn lane from Margarita Road into the Center is established, the fuel trucks must utilize that entrance; establish hours of fuel delbery to minimize noise impact; -- and staff direction to return at the April 21, 1997 Planning Commission meeting with a resolution containing the findings. The motion failed as follows: AYES: 2 NOES: 3 ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Soltysiak COMMISSIONERS: Slaven, Webster, Fahey COMMISSIONERS None Commissioner Miller, "I move the approval of Planning Application... and as those conditions have been augmented and amended tonight..." Chairman Fahey, "...Clarification on the conditions was...tanker coming through the center vs Yukon with an appropriate time to be determined in the daytime limitation in low traffic times in the center, but not nighttime." Assistant City Anomey Weiner, "You may want to discuss actually what the appropriate time at this point because there may be a disagreement among the people voting on the motion on that." Commissioner Webster, "Give a time range." Chairman Fahey, "10 A to 4 P." Commissioner Miller, "This is petrol deliveries; if I inadvertently made that a part of my motion, apologize. I think it is an inherently bad idea to run a gas truck through that parking lot .... " R: \PLANCOMM\MINUTE$\1997\4-7-97.WPD 6/2/97 v~ 7 'L~TNTNG COI~f?SSTON D~'~]~,Y S, ~1997 Chairman F~ey, "...~e ~o ~ngs ~der di~ussion ~e ~e ~ ~rough ~e tenor vs ~ound Yukon ~d then the hours ~ f~ ~ delive~ of ~el. Does ~e m~er of the motion w~t to cl~ whm ~ey intended for that condi~on?" Co~issioner Miller, "Until there is a left-ram line provided..." C~m F~ey, "The next question w~ hours of deliver. I ~ ~gge~ed ~a ~ff deterinc hou~ of delive~ that would ~ hM ~e le~t noise imp~t to eve~ng ~d nigh~me hou~ m f~ ~ a t~ck comng in ~ere. And someone ~ked ~at we cl~ ~ for di~ussion ~d so I pulled numbers out of the hat which were 10 A to 4 P. Is it, would you like ~at not to ~ in ~ere?" Commissioner Miller, "I don't ~ow ~ it if we ~e ~ng a~ut w~ting to reduce t~ffic, I would ~me it should be at the laer hours." ~ssioner Sol~si~, "I ~i~ ~e concern a~ut ~e l~er hours is how much noise it would m~e." Commissioner Miller, "Perh~s we should Md ~ Mdifion~ condition ~at I don't ~ow ~at ~is happens, but when ~e t~cker is ~ere to drop ~e ~el...~ere is no noi~ involved." Chai~ F~ey, "Probably you need m cl~ most...~e you m~ing a motion ~at included limi~ hours or does not include limited hours?" Co~issioner Miller, "I ~ not m~ing ~at p~ of my motion." Chai~ F~ey, "So the m~r of ~e motion would not include ~y limi~ to ~e hours. Does ~e second concur wi~ that?" ~ssioner Sol~si~, "I don't ~ I ~ ~owl~geable m m~e ~ de~ination...our intent which is to minimi~ the imp~t." Ch~ F~ey, "Do you have a problem wi~ staff m~ing ~az." Co~issioner Miller, "Not at ~1." Ch~m F~ey, "Staff work on minimizing ~e noise ~d trYtic imp~t by n~owing down the hours of ~el delive~..." Do you agr~ ~at ~ose ~e ~e conditions ~at you were requesting, second..." The motion did not p~s. Commissioner Webster, "I'd like to move to m~e ~e s~e motion, but ju~ to chmge ~e hours of operation till 12 o'clock midnight for ~e g~ station." Ch~ F~ey, "So what about the opening time?" Co~issioner Webster, "~ening time I w~t m cl~ ~is. ~y rout, my time just ~at ~e hours of operation end at 12 midnight... begi~ing of 6 AM." R: ~P~CO~MINUT~1997~4-7-97.~D 6/2/97 v~ 8 pr,ANNTNG COMMT~TON Chairman Fahey, "We have a motion for of the previous motion and conditions with one additional condition that the hours of operation are 6 AM to midnight. Is there a second?" Commissioner Webster, "Actually, let me modify that. Speaking more of a 5 AM to 12 midnight due to the number of commuters .... " The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 NOES: 2 ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Webster, Fahey COMMISSIONERS: Slaven, Soltysiak COMMISSIONERS None Forest City Workshop (Mall Project-Winchester/Ynez/Margarita Roads) Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented a summary of the project's background. Associate Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. Chairman Fahey questioned the review of the environmental impact report. Mr. Fagan stated the pro,.: appears to be consistent with the parameters of the EIR. Cola Macken, representing Forest City Development, stated the power center elevations will be ready by June 2, 1997, and it is hoped elevations of the anchor stores will also be ready at that time. Jim Heller, KA Architects, Cleveland, stated the anchor department stores will do their own designs as they will own the buildings, but will work with Forest City to develop an integrated design scheme. Mr. Heller explained the site plan. Tom Gmover explained the design study model illustrates patios, landscaping, and activity space (football fie]d-size) for special community and tenant events. He also displayed the proposed materials and colors; explained how each major courtyard will have a different theme, and how building fronts/backs will be designed to resemble a main street, with each tenant having an opportunity to customize their individual entrance. Phil Milsap, Mason Design, provided overall landscaping information and stated the landscaping is based on the approved Specific Plan. Mr. Macken stated the power center is an integral pan and economically makes the development work. He said it will extend to North General Kearny Road, which is larger than previously shown, and will have the same architectural features as the front of the mall. Mr. Macken mentioned an approved sit plan should be ready by the June 2, 1997 hearing. R:\PLANCOMM\MINUTE$\!997\4-7-97.I4pD 6/2/97 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 7, 1997 R:\STAFFRPTL~$PA~.CC1 §/3/~7 dwh '~ 6 TO: FROM: Planning Commission ~ Debbie Ubnoske~; Planning Manager MEMORANDUM DATE: April 7, 1997 SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Director's Approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) - Shell automobile service station, car wash, convenience mart, and a Kentucky Fried Chicken fast food restaurant with drive through service, at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the Palomar Village Shopping Center Prepared by: Carole K. Donahoe, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: Review and consider the issues of concern raised by Commissioner $1aven, determine whether the Planning Director's approval was appropriate, and if necessary, make any needed modifications to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND This project is the construction and operation of an automobile service station with a 648 square foot automated car wash, an 875 square foot convenience mart (without alcoholic beverage sales) and a 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service on 0.794 acres located at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the Palomar Village Shopping Center. All uses are expected to operate seven (7) days per week. The service station is proposed to operate on a 24-hour basis; the car wash operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; and the fast food restaurant will operate 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. This application was approved by the Planning Director on March 13, 1997. This appeal was filed March 25, 1997 by Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven (see Attachment 1). Commissioner Slaven stated that she had a number of concerns with the design of the project. Her major concerns included the 24-hour operation of the service station, the off-site illumination of the canopy lighting, and the need for an adequate landscape buffer on the north side of the project site. ANALYSIS North side landscql~ing and wall I~lans During the Planning Director's hearing for Planning Application No. PA96-0345, the applicant's representative agreed to add Condition #4.b. requiring a block wall on the north side of the project. It is anticipated that the block wall will be constructed of decorative block, and located on the interior, down side of the proposed berm. Additionally, the applicant agreed to cluster R:~,-taffrptk.345pa~.ap~ 4/?J~7 cad landscaping along the street side of the wall to discourage graffiti. The applicant's representative is in the process of preparing the revised plans showing these changes. While the revised plans were not available for distribution to the Commission at the time this staff report was prepared, the representative will have them available to the Commission prior to or at the Commission's April 7, 1997 hearing. Project lighting The approved project recluires the use of recessed lighting fixtures in the canopy to minimize off-site illumination. The applicant's proposal for canopy lighting was reviewed by the City's Chief Building Official Anthony J. Elmo, CBO. His comments are noted in a February 11, 1997 letter to the applicant, which is included as Attachment 2. Additionally, the applicant's representative is preparing a supplemental lighting analysis in response to the appeal. The analysis will be distributed to the Commissioners at the April 7, 1997 hearing. Project's 24-ho-r A,,tomobile Rervice -~t-tion oDerAtion The original project proposal listed the following hours of operation: Gas station Car wash Fast food 24-hours per day a.m. to 11 p.m. a.m. to 10 p.m. 7 days per week 7 days per week 7 days per week The City's Development Code discusses car washes in Section 17.08.050 (d), Special Use Regulations and Standards, and hours of operation are specifically limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. The applicant accepted these hours for the car wash. However, he did not wish to decrease the hours of operation for the service station. Summ~ry The issues discussed herein were considered by staff during the processing of the applicant's proposal. Much of the redesign of the project and the revised Conditions of Approval that were ultimately approved by the Planning Director, are a direct result of these discussions. Attachments: Correspondence from Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven dated March 25, 1997- Blue Page 3 Correspondence from Chief Building Official Anthony J. Elmo, CBO dated February 11, 1997- Blue Page 4 Minutes of the March 13, 1997 Planning Director's Hearing - Blue Page 5 Staff Report and Conditions of Approval Revised March 13, 1997 - Blue Page 6 R:\sta~frpt~45pa96.ap~ 4/2/97 cad ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 6 LETTERS IN OPPOSITION R:\STAFFRFI'E345PA96.CCl §13197 dwh 17 1409 Via Gabriel Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 April 4, 1997 Temecula Planning Commission New City Hall 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Proposed project at Yukon and Margarita Gentlemen and/or Mesdames: As the owner of the house at 30416 Danube Court, Temecula, I wish to register my opposition to the installation of a gas station, car wash and convenience store at the corner of Yukon and Margarita. It is my opinion that this project will adversely affect the value of my property because of noise, increased traffic, and the possibility of pollution of the Long Valley Wash. Please do not approve this project. Sincerely, Sandra Forman MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager Carole Donahoe, Project Planner Shell Station Appeal - Telephone Call in Opposition to the Project April 7, 1997 Jeri and John Witt, 30321 Tradewater Court, Temecula (The Villages subdivision) called because Mrs. Witt is ill and unable to attend the Planning Commission hearing this evening. They want to voice opposition to the project, Planning Application No. PA96-0345. They have requested that the following information be distributed to the Commission: The project will be noisy. They are opposed to the car wash and Shell station. The KFC would be okay. The project will generate traffic and cause accidents. There are no lights on Yukon, either at Margarita or at Rancho California Road. 3. The project will devalue surrounding residential property. CC: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner Larry Cooley, Assistant Engineer Larry Markham, representative Markham & Associates Via FAX No. 699-1848 I#onclay April 7, 1~? 2:12pa -- P.~e 11 The Avalon Management Group xUvVeflt xFerRevie~ Oeqeas~Co , v~t 2 04/O7/97 Ker~Jcky F~ed ChickarL ~ inc~Jde I i'~ Ihe ~ re: Planning ~ no. PA.q6-0345 (Devek3pmer~ jHondoy ApHt 7, 1997 2:121:m To: ~ VJllalle ~ Dm~ wut.Km,~ JVe~/bit 42191 Rubidon Cm:le Apfd 7, 1997 To 1he V'dlag¢ Boant of Directors, ~,a Plmming Commission: Ploa~ allow me to set/he record sUaight..I am vd,-m,-~tly opposod to any seavice statioa or rcstaumnts amassing dos~ to my locale. These im~ine~-% along with lhe Phuming Commission, are inviting high speeds, vandalism, crimo and lraffio into a quiet, family- orimlexl nci~hhodaood. Prolxaty values are at rislL as is this commtmi .ty and my quality of We all know hhat growlh is an important part of any city, but not at the expens~ of ~ablished, quality ncighbo~s. Please undergrand I am not opposed ~o progress in Temooula, but the comer of Yukon and Margarila is not a good localion fo~ these b~incasca. Kcatucky Fried Chickca and Shell may feel that this is an ideal ioe. ariott for making profi~ but they probably wouldn't live in a neighborhood studded wid~ fast food restrotators and gas sialions. Would you?? Their profits will not b, r¢inv~lcd into our nci~=hhodaoods willa trccs and oth~ improvcancnts, but ralhc'r into parking 1o1~ 85 wcll as their poekeg. Temecttla is a wonderful city in which, ~o live and raise f~ilies. Part oflhe city's altractioa is its ability to foresee potential problems and ¢limin~ting ~ by ZODing giroilar buslncsscs logcthcr. K. ggp these typ~s ofbusincsses out ofresidemi~l r~ighbod~nod.q! Let ms not give liceage to Ihc highest bidder but rather to eat which will enhance 1he '~1~ oftho community and our city. Sincerely, Dan and Karen Nes, bit MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager Carole Donahoe, Project Planner Shell Station Appeal - Telephone Call in Opposition to the Project April 7, 1997 I received a call this morning from Ruby Doerksen, 30551 Hollyberry Lane, Temecula (Village Grove subdivision) who is unable to attend the Planning Commission hearing this evening, but wanted to voice her opposition to the project, Planning Application No. PA96- 0345. She has requested that I relay the following information to the Commission: The project lacks a current traffic report. In light of the hazards existing at the intersection of Margarita and Rancho California Roads, safety concerns should be addressed. The increase in traffic caused by the buildout of the shopping center renders the General Plan study obsolete. The project will generate noise and fumes that will rise up and impact the surrounding residences. o The project is not suitable down the street from an established community. The masterplan for the shopping center did not show a gas station. Temecula residents' voices should be heard. CC: Larry Markham, representative Markham & Associates Via FAX No. 699-1848 MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager Carole Donahoe, Project Planner Shell Station Appeal - Telephone Call in Opposition to the Project April 7, 1997 Harold Doerksen, 30551 Hollyberry Lane, Temecula (Village Grove subdivision) has called because he is unable to attend the Planning Commission hearing this evening, and wants to voice his opposition to the project, Planning Application No. PA96-0345. He has requested that I relay the following information m the Commission: 1. Temecula is over-saturated with car washes. We don't need another one. 2. The project doesn't add anything to the area. The project should consider another pad at the shopping center that is adjacent to Rancho California Road. 4. Yukon is a residential street and wasn't constructed for tankers and other commercial use. CC: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner Larry Cooley, Assistant Engineer Larry Markham, representative Markham & Associates Via FAX No. 699-1848 DON'T LET MARGARITA ROAD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BECOME DEATH ALLEY THREE SCHOOLS ARE ON MARGARITA THAT PULL STUDENTS FROM ACROSS RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD. TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL, MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL AND THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AT MARGARITA AND MORAGA. THEY WILL ALL BE PASSING THE DANGEROUS LEFT TURN INTO YUCON JUST A SHORT BLOCK FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD. ENOUGH PEOPLE USE THIS TURN NOW, GOING INTO THE MARKET AND INTO VILLAGE GROVE. MORE PEOPLE TURNING IN AT ALL TIMES OF THE DAY AND NIGHT FOR GAS WOULD INCREASE THE LIKELIHOOD OF ACCIDENTS GREATLY. Remember your childhood! did YOU always look both ways before you crossed the street? was there one time you saw your friend across the street and ran across not carefully but on the spur of the moment. All kids are vulnerable to this moment. THE PRIME QUESTION IS, CAN FAMILIES COPE WITH THE ODDS OF THEIR CHILDREN BEING KILLED IN THAT UNEXPECTED MOMENT. All the Neighbors of this Gas station are going to have to learn to live with added noise, lights shining in the window all night long. PEOPLE DO NOT KEEP THEIR STORES OPEN, IF BUSINESS IS NOT BEING DONE. NONE OF THE PEOPLE IN VILLAGE will escape the noise or the fear for their kids. WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN THROUGH THE ACCIDENT AT THE HIGH SCHOOL CORNER THAT KILLED SEVERAL STUDENTS AND THE OTHER YOUNG MAN ON A VISIT TO HIS FATHERS HOME THAT WAS KILLED CROSSING THE STREET. QUESTION! HOW MANY OF THESE GAS STATION MINI MARTS DO WE HAVE ALREADY! do we need one on every corner. WITHIN TWO BLOCKS WE HAVE A PROPOSED MINI MART, WITHIN TWO BLOCKS WE HAVE A CAR WASH AND Gas STATION. will the competition put some out of business and will we be left with a decaying neighborhood of empty stores. WE HAVE SEEN THIS IN TEMECULA BEFORE . We have just heard a number of Politicians talk about family values. Where does this responsibility stop, at the door of the child's house. OR, IS IT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VILLAGE, AS THE FIRST LADY REMINDS US IN HER BOOK "IT TAKES A VILLAGE". ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, DON'T KILL OUR NEIGHBORHOOD KIDS, OR OUR MAR 13 1997 , January28,1997 Anita Chaplin c/o Avalon Mgmt. Co. 31590 Railroad Canyon Rd. Canyon Lk., CA 92587 Re: Proposed Gas Station Complex After observing a sign on the comer of Yukon and Rancho California Roads which indicated a proposed gas station, conveinance mart, fast food restaurants and car wash, I called the City of Temecula Planning Department and spoke with Carol, who is the Project Coordinator. She informed me the project was in a preliminary stage and was actually proposed for the corner of Yukon and Margarita Road, (the sign was placed on the wrong comer). She indicated to me the City was also concerned with the request to have the complex open 24 hours as well as the placement of the car wash. My concern is for the safety of my area subdivision with regard to health and hazardous conditions produced by this business. It puts the Villages Homeowners Association and the City of Temecula in a precarious position with regard to liability by allowing this business to proceed and operate within such close proximity to homes. I would appreciate a further evaluation of the proximity of the gas station complex to existing homes in the subdivision. This being a mere twenty yards away can produce excessive congestion, noise and a definite threat to our health. Please reconsider allowing this type of business to operate in that small area. Surely a restaurant or some other passive use can be maintained in that small space. Respectfully, Mrs. Audrey Madonia 30486 Danube Court Temecula, California 92591