The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About021396 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Debilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, I~ase contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Nuilflcation 48 hours Ixior meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA Tie II] ARFNDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER. 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD FEBRUARY 13, 1996- 7:00 PM § 54956.9|a), Vance Cornoration v. 'CITY of Temec, a,. § 54956.9(b|. two matters of potendd Btiged0~.." 5:30 PM -. Closed Sosdon of the City Councfi/Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Govemment Coda Sections: .. .' ' '.' .~.. ~.~..::':". '.;., "'~.',~i.:~'' '.:.~. '~' ..':'.~':~.~:...,' · , ,.v ,~. ~./ :... .~. , :',. ....,. ,,'.":'.. .. (922-054-003) and 28555Pujd Street |9224)54-006); Negotiating Perde~john~Fm~ta.;' ',~ '. Cande Cebal!ol and the Rede~dopment Agency' Of 'the' CIty .ef Tenteddie; ,U~ 'negotiation:'.. · ~ p.c. andterm ' ': · ...' .' :.' ... ,L:.' · .. .~ ' , ..... ,:~ · ... ",.,,, :'>.., ~' · , ,~ '~ ~,,~ ,"':.',,.: ::., · Avenue;' Negotiating Pardes: Jan We:'lert'.RV; Norm Reeves 'Super 'GrOUp'and ti~'.: :,: .~.'.:.~.i"~: ~'. ".:", Redevelopment Agency of the CIty'0f TemecUla; ,Under negotiation':; conddei;atimt"~;leae · proposals. . : ' ' :'. :". ' :' :':'.' ...."', ~."' · :: './.~ :"": '~'; ,: · . . , , .. , ' .~ ~/~ ~ · § 54956.9(a), Claim of 0rico ~nSurance on Behalf of brsn Orteia."":' ' ' ....."" '.'.'.'" ;..'.~,':'.~.' ..,~ ,..:., ., , ;~ ..' .. .. . · .... .. ,, ',;:. · . '.... ,' .'.~.. · . , .' . ./ · , At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to .1 0:0OPM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Mayor Karel Lindemans presiding Pastor George Simmons, House of Praise Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 96-03 Resolution: No. 96-10 Rag Salute: Councilmember Stone ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Roberrs, Stone, Lindemans PRESENTATIONS/ Oath of Office - Councilmember Ford PROCLAMATIONS Certificate of Appreciation '- Planning Commission Service - Steve Ford PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or are listed on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is e five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the sgenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will. be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC NI matters fisted under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure . RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. see 2 2 4 5 6 Aooroval of Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of January 23, 1996. Resolution Aooroving Iist of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION N0. 96..01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Reoort RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1995. Records Destruction ADoroyal RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Prooertv Insurance Coverage RECOMMENDATION: ' 6.1 Approve the City of Temecula's property' insurance policy renewal with Reliance Insurance Company, Hartford Steam Boiler, and Pacific Insurance Company, LtdJAgricultural Insurance for the period of February 26, 1996 through February 26, 1997 in the amount of ~73,260; 6.2 Appropriate $26,600 from the Insurance Internal Service Fund Retained Earnings to the Property Insurance Account. &.Weend~0213N 7 Direction on Pending Council Reauest RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Direct staff to discontinue development of a tree ordinance. 8 9 Out-of-State Travel RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans. Resolution Finding Benefit to the Community from the Statewide School Facilities General Obliaation Bond RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY FROM THE STATEWIDE SCHOOL FACILITIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 10 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material. and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 20703-1 (Located easterly of intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 10.2 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumantation bonds in Tract No. 20703-1; Direct'the City Clerk to so advise. the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. IL'V~endaV)213N 4 11 Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. ~0703-~ (Located easterly of intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2; 11.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage and Water and Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumectation Bond; 11,3 Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders and approve the subdivision agreement rider; 11.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. 12 '13 Release the Public Improvement Warranty. Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22786 (Located southwesterly of intersection of Nicdas Road at North General Kearny Road) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monumentation, Faithful Performance Warranty, and Labor and. Material Bonds, in Tract No. 22786; 12.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Surety and Developer. ACCePt Public Imorovements in Tract No. ~3126 (Located southerly of Intersection of Nicolas Road at Roripaugh Road) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 23126; 13.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond; 13.3 Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders and approve the subdivision agreement rider; 13.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. 14 15 Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No. 19939~1. ~ and F) (Located northwesterly of intersection of Pala Road at Via Eduardo) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, .. CAUFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM {WITHIN TRACTS NO. 19939-1,2 AND F) Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No. 20703-2. and 23126) (Located southeasterly of intersection of Winchester Road at Roripaugh Road) 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITYo MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-2 AND 23126) 16 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No. 20703-1 and 22786) (Located southwesterly of the intersection of Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO 20703-1 AND 22786) R:V~eemk~21286 e 17 Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No. 22208) (Located northeasterly of Margarita Road at Solarm Way) RECOMMENDATION: 18 19 17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION N0. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO 22208) Award a Contract to Remove and Replace Concrete and A.C. on Co0~merce 'Center Drive. Public Works Maintenance - Project No. PW95-96-17 RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Award a contract to Maples and Associates to remove and replace concrete and 'A.C. on Commerce Center Drive, 200 feet south of Enterprise Circle West at the channel. ComDletion and AcceDtance of the Construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs. Project No. PW95-~1 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Accept the Construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-21; 19.2 File Notice of completion, release the Performance bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 19.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 20 Sewer Facilities Agreement with Eastern Municioal Water District for Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15. Bridee Widening and Northbound Ramo Improvements. Project No. PW94-21 RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents. 20.2 Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering, inspection and testing fees in the amount of 63,940.00. . II.'~ewU~O2IIN 7 21 Sewer Facilities and Service Aareement with Eastern Municipal Water District for Construction of a Sanitary Sewer in Pauba Ropd for the Parkview Site Imorovement Project - Phase I. Fire Station No. 84. Project No. PW95-09 RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents;. 21.2 Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering, inspection and testing fees in the amount of $7,655.00. 22 23 24 Award of Contract for the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project. Proiect No. PW95-06 RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Award a contract for the construction of the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project, Project No; PW95-06 to Ciovis Paving and Sealing, Inc., for $653,929.15 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 22.2, Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $65,392.92 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Second Amendment to Employment Systems. Inc. Aareement to Provide Insecti0n services for the Winchester Interchanae Project No. PW94-21 RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Approve the Second Amendment to Employment Systems, Inc. Agreement to provide Inspector Services for the Winchester Interchange Project No. PW94-21. Proposed Detour for Winchester Road Construction - Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot Sorinos Road (Area 1 ) RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Request approval from Caltrans the proposed detour' plan (Alternative #2), to facilitate the safe and timely construction of Winchester Road (Area 1 ). 25 26 Award of Bid for Reolacement Cornouter Workstations RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Award a bid for the purchase of the replacement computer workstations for City Hall, Bid Number 96-01 to Gdden State Trading Company for $205,608,55; 25.2 Approve an Operating Transfer from the General Fund to the Information Services Internal Services Fund in the amount of $200,000, Amendment to Lease Aareement RECOMMENDATION: 26.1 Approve an amendment to the Real Proparty Lease Agreement between the Temecula Town Association and the City of Temecula regarding the operation and maintenance of Rotary Park, RECESS CITY COUNCIL M,R;'rlNG FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVIC;S DISTRICT MEETING, T;MECULA RED;V;LOPMI:NT MI:PTINn, OLD TOWN/WPSTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITI;S DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MI:E'I'ING OLD TOWN/WFSTSIDI: IMPROVPMENT AUTHORITY R.'V~eend~021 N · TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICFS DISTRICT MEETING Next ,~ Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 96-01 Resolution: No. CSD 96-01 CALL TO ORDER: President Ron Roberrs ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberrs PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item ngt listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996. 2 Fence Installation Contract - Temecula Duck Pond RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Award contract of $22,985 to Rancho Recycled Products for the installation of 1783 linear feet of white, two-rail trail fencing at the Temacula Duck Pond. R.~gete~o2131e 10 3 Release of Iabor and Materials Bond for Voorburo Park - Nicolas Road and North General Kearnv Road RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Authorize the City Clerk to release the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for the construction of Voorburg Park - Van Daele Development Corporation. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT- Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: February. 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. ~V~eendlRO213M 11 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 96-01 ** Resolution: No. RDA 96-01 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone~ Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. SHakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out end filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 23, 1996. AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Temdcula O.N.E. Operation Neighborhood Enrichment RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file report. &'Veend.~021306 12 3 Rancho West Aoartments Proposed Tax-Exempt Financino RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 4 3.2 3.3 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE ACQUISITION BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITION OF A MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT AND RELATED FACILITIES Appoint Jones, Hall, Hill and White as Bond Counsel for the issue; Direct staff to prepare documents acceptable to the Executive Director, Redevelopment Agency Attorney, and Bond Counsel to effectuate the sale of bonds to finance the purchase of the Rancho West Apartments. Comparison of Current Loan Proarams RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Review the Redevelopment-Agency Loan Program and criteria and provide direction to staff concerning the program, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: February 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:%~gendl~O213H 13 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ..' CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENTS President Patricia H. Birdsall Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall Resolution No.: Next in Order: No. FA 95-06 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not; listed on the Agenda a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996. AUTHORITY BUSINESS 2 FinancinQs for Old Town Area Public Imorovements and the Western Bvoass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AMENDING RESOLUTIONS OF INTENTION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LAND WITHIN THE PROPOSED DISTRICT, AUTHORIZE THE FINANCING OF ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS, APPROVE A REVISED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES, AND INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE DISTRICT R:~4~nda%O2139e 14 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: February 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. fl R:%Agef'da~21396 16 CALL TO ORDilb r, aV~L,~ Patdcia H. Birdsall PUBUC cxxeaim'r8 A totel of15 minutee is provided so members of the public can addre~ the Council on item-that ere not Illted on the Agede. Speekes are limited to two (2) minut~ each. If youdeiretolpeakto~C~e~enitemOgl;IbtedontheAgende apink"Reque~t To lieelk" form dte. dd be fled out and filed' with the City Clerk. When you are cadled to speak, please come forwad 8nd .-irate vg' ' ~ =rid addl:lll,' RECOk~,;NDATION: 1.1' Approve the ms of JarKmry 9, 1996. Next~ 'roering: February 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Viitilted, Tbt. I.C'al, Calif0rfde. 11 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit wdtten comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be beard in suppert of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public headng or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or pdor to, the public headng. 27 Plannino Aoolication No. PA95-O113 - Deletion of Conditions of Aooroval and Release of Bonds for Parcel Mao 23969 (Located on the southerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 1,200 feet southerly of Rancho California Road) RECOMMENDATION: 27.1 Adopt a resolution emitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0113 TO DELETE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP 23969 KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-044, 045, 046, 047 AND 048 27.2 Delete Conditions of Approval No. 21,22 and 23 for Parcel Map No. 23969; 27.3 Release Bond No. 177 40 76 for Labor and Materials and Faithful Performance; 27.4 Release Bond No. 117 40 78 for Subdivision Warranty. 28 Plannina Aoolication No. PA95-0133, Zonina Amendmen~ & Plannino Aoolication No. PA95-0134. General Plan Amendment RECOMMENDATION: 28.1 Adopt a resolution emitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION N0. PA95-(:)134, CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTH OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007 R:~aeende~O21398 17 28.2 Read by title only end introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0133, ZONING AMENDMENT, CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTHERLY OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007 28.3 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA95-0133, Zoning Amendment and Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment. COUNCIL BUSINESS 29 Interim Planning Aoolication Fees RECOMMENDATION: 29.1 Adopt · resolution entitled: 3O RESOLUTION NO. 96- A-RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION FEES Review and ADoroyal of the 22nd Year Community Develooment Block Grant Aoolications for FY 1996-97 RECOMMENDATION: 30.1 Review the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendations submitted by the Finance Committee, and provide final recommendations to be forwarded to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA) for consideration. 11 31 32 Temecula Valley In-Line Hockev Association Reauest RECOMMENDATION: 31.1 Consider a request from the Temecula Valley In-Une Hockey Association to provide a matching grant for every 81.00 raised and in-kind services provided not to exceed 832,500 from General Fund Reserves. 31.2 Appropriate 832,500 to the Community Services Funding account from General Fund Reserves. Direction of the Development of a Sion Ordinance Committee RECOMMENDATION: 32.1 Consider Option 1, the creation of · sign ordinance committee to help staff in developing a locally appropriate sign ordinance. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: February 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD JANUARY 23, 1996 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:03 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Karel F. Lindemans presiding. PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Sections: §54956.8- Conference with Real Property negotiator regarding property located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue: Negotiating Parties - Jan Weilert RV, Norm Reeves Super Group and the city of Temecula: Under negotiation: consideration of lease proposals. 2. Government Code § 54956.8- Conference with real property negotiator regarding property located at 28816 Pujol Street: Negotiating Parties - Temecula Town Association and the City of Temecula, Under Negotiation: consideration of acquisition agreement. 3. Government Code §54956.8- Conference with real property negotiator regarding the property located east of Margarita Road, directly North of the Winchester Creek Development, Negotiating parties: Stephen A. Bieri Company and the City of Temecula, Under Negotiation: consideration of acquisition agreement. 4. Government Code §54956.9(b), one matter of potential litigation. The motion was unanimously carried. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Sofia Sadler, Harvester Church of Temecula. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Stone. PUBLIC COMMENTS Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, voiced objections to holding the Special Election to fill the unexpired term of Ronald J. Parks on November 5, 1996, stating the election should be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1996. Minutes%1%23%96 -1 - 01/30/96 CiW Council Minutes January 23. 1996 City Attorney Thorson responded that it is his opinion, pursuant to Election Code Section 10229 3(d) and Government Code Section 36512(c), the next possible election dates to hold an election are November 1996 or November 1997. He explained that there is not an election scheduled throughout the City of Temecula on the June date, since the primaries have been changed to March 26, 1996. Councilmember Stone objected to Mr. Pratt's comments and stated the Council is doing everything possible to 'provide for an election as soon as possible. Mayor Lindemans requested a letter be sent to Mr. Pratt explaining the City's position regarding the special election date. Councilmember Roberts stated Mr. Pratt's statement that the City knew in October that Mr. Parks was planning to resign was incorrect. Thomas Stultz, 32076 Corte Soledad, objected to the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment approved by the Council at the public hearing on January 9, 1996. Cynthia Arocha, 44535 Bedford Court, asked for a status report regarding a traffic signal at Bedford Court and 79 South. Public Works Director Joe Kicak reported this item will be discussed at the Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting of February 22, 1996, where recommendations regarding priorities will be made. Barbara Zera, 39657 June Court, thanked the Council for the excellent job they are doing and presented them a banner expressing appreciation signed by a number of citizens. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, thanked the City Council and City staff for the outstanding service they provide to the community. Timothy J. Miller, 45052 Corte Bella Donna, thanked the City Council and staff for outstanding accomplishments they have made since incorporation. Wesley Scott, 30006 Mira Loma, addressed the Council regarding the donation of yellow tulips, suggesting they be planted on Rancho Vista Road as an entry to the Community Recreation Center. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson announced, under the provisions of the Brown Act, there was nothing to report regarding the discussions held during closed session. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Stone stated he was presented a petition containing 100 signatures in support of the City assisting the Temecula Valley Hockey Association with building a facility on the Minutes%1%23%96 -2- O1/30/96 City Council Minutes January 23, 1996 Temecula Town Association property on Pujol Street. He requested this be agendized for further discussion. Councilmember Stone also requested staff look at the traffic back-ups created by stop signs on 79S, to see if something can be done to alleviate this problem. Councilmember Birdsall thanked the citizens who spoke in support of the City council. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Birdsall requested the removal of Item No. 6 from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Stone stated he would abstain on Item No. 19 and 19a. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-5 and 7-19a. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Stone abstaining on Items No. 19 end 19a. The motion was unanimously carried. Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Aooroval of Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996. Resolution Aoorovinq List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- 05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Minutee%1%23%96 -3- 01/30/96 City Council Minutes January 23. 1996 CombininQ Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1995 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Exoenses and ChanQes in Retained EarninQs for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1995 4.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1995 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1995. Out of State Travel Aooroval 5.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans as outlined in the staff report. e e 10. Records Destruction ReQuest 7.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Release of Monument Bonds in Parcel Mao No. 26852 (located northwesterly corner of Winchester road at Margarita Road) 8.1 Authorize the release of Subdivision Monument Bond in Parcel Map No. 26852; 8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Quitclaim Deed for Certain Storm Drain Easements within Tract No. 23267-3 (located northerly of Loma Linda Road, easterly of Via Del Coronado, and south of Temecula Creek) 9.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign the Quitclaim Deed; 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to return the executed Quitclaim Deed to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Amendment to Agreement for Flood Plain Develooment in Tracts No. 23267-3 and 23267-F (located southwesterly of Intersection of Margarita Road at State Highway 79 South) 10.1 10.2 Authorize the approval of the First Amendment to that Agreement relating to certain properties with the TemecUla Creek Flood Plain in portions of Tracts No. 23267-3 and 23267-F. Direct the City Clerk to so advise the several developers. Minutes% 1%23%96 -4- 01/30/96 CiW Council Minutes Jenuarv 23. 1996 11. ACCePt Public Imorovements in Tract No. 23125-1 (located at the. northeast corner at Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road) 11.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 23125-1; 11.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage and Water and Sewer Bond amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monumentation and Traffic bonds; 11.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 12. Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No. 23125-1) (located northeasterly corner of De Portola Road at Butterfield Stage Road) 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- 06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 23125-1 ) 13. Acceptance of the Grant of e Storm Drain Easement Over a Portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Mao No. 9610 Abuttin{3 Lvndie Lane (located north of Lyndie Lane and west of Rancho California Road) 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- 07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF A STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 9610 ABUTTING LYNDIE LANE Minutes\l \23\96 -5- 01130/96 CiW Council Minutes Jenuerv 23. 1996 14. 15. 16. Summary Vacation of an Existina Thirty-Six Foot (36') Access ODenine Frontina on Jefferson Avenue between Overland Drive and Via Montezuma Drive on Parcel 5 of Parcel MaD No, 22300 and Acceptance of New Access Ooenina 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- 08 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING AN EXISTING THIRTY-SIX FOOT (36') ACCESS OPENING EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTED ABUTTER RIGHTS FOR PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP 22300 LOCATED ON JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN OVERLAND DRIVE AND VIA MONTEZUMA DRIVE 14.2 Approve the new location of a thirty-six foot (36') access opening as described on Exhibit "A" and authorize the Mayor to sign the acceptance of the access dedication. "No Parking" Zones on Ynez Road between Solana Way and the Temecula Town Center 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- 09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 95-84 ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON BOTH SIDES OF YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN SOLANA WAY AND THE TEMECULA TOWN CENTER AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A" Professional Geotechnical Services Contract with Leighton and Associates, Inc. for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15. Bridoe Widenine and Northbound Ramp Improvements. Project No. PW94-21 16.1 Award a contract for Professional Geotechnical Services for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramps Improvements, Project No. PW94-21, to Leighton and Associates, Inc. for $68,833.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 16.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $6,883.30 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Minutes\1%23~96 -6- 01/30/96 City Council Minutes January 23. 1996 17. Award of Contract for City Wide Right-Of-Way Tree Trimming Program 17.1 Award a contract for Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for $18,737.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 17.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $1,873.70 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 18. Consultant Services Contract with the Elliott Grouo to Provide Landscape Plan Review and Inspection Services for Develooment Projects 18.1 Award a Consulting Services Contract to The Elliott Group to provide landscape plan check review and inspection services for development proposals and authorize the Mayor to sign said contract. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 19. Second Readinc~ of Ordinance No. 96-01 19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. I AMENDING SECTIONS IlloD, Ill.E, III.F AND III.G TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberrs, Lindemans 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: .None 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Minutes% 1%23\96 -7- 01/30/96 City Council Minutes January 23. 1996 19a Second Readina of Ordinance No. 96-02 19a. 1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING A VACANCY TO EXIST IN THE CITY COUNCIL, CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 1996 TO ELECT A PERSON TO FILL THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM OF THE VACANT COUNCIL OFFICE AND PROVIDING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO THE VACANT OFFICE UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL ELECTION The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Workers Comoensation Renewal Birdsall, Roberts, Lindemans None None Stone Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall asked if this policy includes dividends. Human Resources Administrator Grant Yates stated this policy does not include dividends. He explained that dividends have been decreasing and staff feels more savings can be realized by choosing a policy with lower fees. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 6.1 Approve entering into an agreement with California compensation for Employee Workers Compensation Insurance, subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney. The motion was unanimously carried. RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 7:38 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 7:41 following the scheduled Community Services District Meeting and the Redevelopment Agency Meeting. Minutes%1%23\96 -8- 01130/96 City Council Minutee January 23. 1996 COUNCIL BUSINESS 20. Public Meetina on Assessment District 95-1 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.6 Councilmember Stone announced he would abstain on this item based on a conflict of interested due to property ownership in Old Town. Director of Public Works Joe Kicak presentedthe staff report.. Noel Christensen, representing Egan & Associates, outlined the construction of the 4- lane Western Bypass Corridor including a breakdown of the $14 million cost estimate. Donald L. Martin, 12132 Woodlawn Avenue, Santa Ana, spoke in opposition to the forming of Assessment District 95-1. RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 8:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:12 PM. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Ste L, representing First Pacific National Bank, requested Parcels 15, 16, 41 and 48 included in Zone C, stating this would be more equitable. John F. Firestone, 3301 Hudnall, Dallas, Texas, concurred with Larry Markham's comments. Mark Telford, 28481 Rancho California Road, representing Rancho California Industrial Park II Association, spoke in opposition to being included in Assessment District 95-1. Richard M. Alvarez, 28373-28545Felix Valdez, representing Alvarez Properties, spoke in opposition to be included in Assessment District 95-1. He. nry Testasecca, 44000 Sandia Creek Road, spoke in opposition to Assessment District 95-1. 21 Review of Process for Interviewina Candidates for City Council Appointment City Manager Bradley presented a staff report. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone that the public comment portion of the meeting for non-agenda items will be limited to 10 minutes to allow ample time to interview the candidates. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes~1%23\96 -9- 01~0~6 City Council Minutes January 23, 1996 It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts that for public comments on the agenda item, speakers will be limited to two minutes per speaker. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone that each candidate will be given a five (5) minute time period for initial interviews 'with an additional one minute allowed for any specific questions from the City Council. If no specific questions are asked of the candidate he or she has the option to use the additional minute to further discuss their qualifications. The motion-was unanimously carried. Council consensus was given that after the hearing of public comments and all of the candidates initial interviews, Councilmember's will announce their selection of three (3) candidates who they feel are the best qualified to be given a final interview. CITY MANAGER REPORTS None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to adjourn at 9:10 PM to a meeting on January 25, 1996, for the purpose of interviewing Candidates for City Council Vacancy, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Possible adjournment to January 26, 1996, (if necessary to complete the interview process), 7:00 PM, Rancho California Water District Board Meeting Room, 42135 Winchester road, Temecula, California. Adjourned Regular Meeting: January 31, 1996, for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing on Assessment District 95-1, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Next regular meeting: February 13, 1996, 7:00 Pm, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor Minutes\l \23%96 - 10.- 01 130/96 City Council Minutes January 23. 1996 ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Minutes%1%23%96 -11 - 01/30/96 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA at-towiNG CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_I3ULA. DOES RESOLVE, DEYEKMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,950.342.51 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of February, 1996. ATTEST: Karel F. Ijndemans, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] Re~n\93 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF ~ULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopt~! at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of February, 1996 by the following roll call vote: COUNCILlVm-MBERS: NOES: COUNCILMF-MBERS: COUNCILMRMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Reeoe\93 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 01/19/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/25/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/01/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/13/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/13/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/25/96 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:' TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 02/13/95 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 280 RDA-CIP 300 INSURANCE 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 208,646.05 36,749.20 2,665.01 51,383.75 6,938.55 22,764.00 22,736.63 1.17 429,121.49 36, 139.08 45,689.96 7,728.11 2,680.93 12,881.99 948,697.18 $ 121,249.61 510,979.81 636,157.11 162,029.72 404,426.85 115,499.41 $ 1,950,342.51 $ 1,834,643,10 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 280 RDA-CIP 300 INSURANCE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I'RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGEI~~-- 71,179.75 13,658.98 458.20 19,627.63 619.16 697.14 2,394.50 3.16 1,987.61 591.11 1,377.46 680.49 2,224.22 115,499.41 $ 1,950,342.51 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE:> 01/19/96 11:38 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAl2' '~ FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 19] TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IHPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 30,685.85 2,374.62 2,385.90 176.32 43,684.89 11,916.44 25,942.70 2,074.18 1,701,21 307.50 121,249.61 vc)Y'~'2 CITY OF TEMECULA 0', > 11:38 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 27300 01/12/96 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES 27301 01/12/96 000253 POSTMASTER ADA RESTROOM UPGRADES NAILING FOR RDA GRAPEVINE 27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN; INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN 27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN 27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC PUBLIC NOTICES 27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN 27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC PUBLIC NOTICES 27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN 27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN 280-199-999-5212 280-199-99~-52~0 001-120-9~-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-161-501-5256 001-120-~-5256 001~161-501-5256 001-120-9~9-5256 001-120-~99-5256 7,600.00 2,941.92 29.82 31.56 29.82 12.78 31.69 14.91 29.82 7,600.00 2,941.92 180.40 27305 01/19/96 001625 A BETTER CONFERENCE, IN CONF CALL ON JAN 5 1996 001-110-99~-5260 101.51 101.51 27306 01/19/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 27306 01/19/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 193-180-9~-5415 193-180-~-5415 56.00 62.00 118.00 27307 01/19/96 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. LA 6015202010196 TH 320-1~-999-5208 50.12 50.12 27308 01/19/96 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP PROF SRVCS/DUCK POND/DEC 210-190-143-5802 01/19/96 000475 B N ! PUBLICATIONS, INC SEM:CONST. CLAIMS:SPAGNOLO 001-165-999-5261 900.00 295.00 900.00 295,00 27510 01/19/96 0006]7 BLACK VOICE NEWS, THE NOTICE INVITING BIDS PW94-15 001-120-~9~-5256 192.00 192.00 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS RETAINER SRVCS:NOV 95 001-130-9~-5246 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL SERViCES:NOV 95 001-130-9~9-5246 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL SERVICES:NOV 95 300-199-999-5246 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL SERVICES:NOV 95 280-199-9~-5246 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS RETAINER LEGAL SRVCS:NOV 95 001-130-99~-5246 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CREDIT:INCORRECT HOURLY RATE 300-199-999-5246 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CREDIT:WAITING DOCUMENTATION 001-130-999-5246 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CREDIT:WAITING DOCUMENTATION 300-199-999-5246 27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CREDIT:WAITING DOCUMENTATION 280-199-999-5246 27311 01/19/96 OOQ1Z3 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS AUG APPROVED BY CLAIM ADJUSTER 300-199-999-5246 27312 01/19/96 001260 C P R S PARK OPERATIONS PARK OPERATIONS CONF:HARTLEY 190-180-999-5261 27313 01/19/96 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. 789-819-697-2 GEN USAGE 001-162-999-5263 27313 01/19/96 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. 789-819-697-2 GEN USAGE 001-161-502-5262 2731] 01/19/96 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. 789-819-697-2 GEN USAGE 190-180-999-5263 27314 01/19/96 001275 COMPUSERVE, INC. SUBSCRIPTION-COMPUTER MAGAZINE 320-1~9-99~-5228 27315 01/19/96 001924 DAVID M. GRIFF[TH & ASS SCHOOL MITIGATION FEE STUDY 001-140-~-5248 27316 01/19/96 000155 DAVLIN AUDIO DUPLICATION SERVS 100-164-604-5250 27316 01/19/96 000155 DAVLIN RECORDINGS OF PC MEETINGS 001-161-501-5250 27316 01/19/96 000155 DAVLIN BROADCASTING OF'COUNCIL MTGS. 001-100-999-5250 01/19/96 0016(>9 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO RE-CYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT 100-164-601-5218 4,500.00 15,397.57 19,257.51 1,]84.40 2,771.13 8.00- 131.00- 1,373.65' 29.05- 8,066.84 45.00 13.09 11 .~ 13.18 10.00 880. O0 21.55 146.66 800.00 101.82 49,835.75 45.00 37.61 10.00 880.00 968.21 101.82 VOUCHRE2 01/19/96 11:38 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27318 27319 27319 27319 27319 27319 27320 27320 27320 27320 27320 27320 27321 27322 27322 27322 27322 27322 27322 27322 27322 27322 27322 27323 27323 CHECK DATE 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 .01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 VENDOR NUMBER 000523 000478 000478 000478 000478 000478 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 001135 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 000184 000184 VENDOR NAME EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS° INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC, FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN ITEM DESCRIPTION 39656 DIEGO DR LDSC/DEC SIGNS FOR EMPLOYEE GOLF TOURN. CITY HALL SIGN - TEMPORARY - PAINTED AND CARVED POSTS I NSTALLAT I ON TAX EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL COSTS 5473 666/+ 0391 0222 RR 5473-6664-0391-0172 RB 5473-6664-0391-0172 RB 5473-666~-0391-0172 RB 5473-6664-0391-0172 RB 5473-6664-0391-0115/JG 5473-6664-0391-0115/JG 5473 666/+ 0391 0123 GT 5473 6664 0391 0123 GT 5473 6664 0391 0123 GT 909 694-1211 POLICE DEPT 909 699-8632 GEM USAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER 193-180-999-5240 001-2172 340-199-999-5219 340-199-999-5219 340-199-999-5219 340-199-999-5219 001-140-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-161-501-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5248 001-I00-999-5260 001-110-999-5258 001-110-999-5260 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 001-120-999-5258 001-120-999-5260 001-161-501-5260 001-161-502-5260 001-161-502-5260 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 ITEM AMOUNT 58.32 150.85 160.Q0 40.00 50.00 15.50 19.50 23.97 18.25 6.50 24.50 41.22 90.00 18.50 262.92 17.0~ 32.45 ~6.39 176.90 72.00 55,13 14.94 40.18 219.38 27.38 CHECK AMOUNT 58.32 416,35 133.94 90.00 1,136.45 246.76 27324 27324 27324 27324 27324 27324 27325 27326 27327 27328 27329 27330 27330 27330 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 000177 000177 0001T7 000177 0001T/' 000177 000175 002149 000939 000193 000695 001667 001667 001667 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI HANDS INTERPRETER REFER I C B 0 - INLAND EMPIRE I C N A - ANNAPOLIS JUN INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTA KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CONF:GFOA:G ROBERTS 5/19-22 SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER SRVC MEMBERSHIP: ANTHONY J. ELMO PUB:INCREASE-SHIPPING CHARGE MEMBERSHIP:LAUBER TEMP HELP W/E 1/07 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 1/07 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 1/07 PETERSON 190-180-999-5220 001-161-501-5220 001-161-502-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5258 001-100-999-5250 001-162-999-5226 001-110-999-5228 100-164-602-5226 001-163-999-5118 100-164-604-5118 001-140-999-5118 12,00 2.73 2.72 89.96 96.78 14.47 275.00 74.00 50.00 2.00 151.00 74.26 144.14 59.15 218.66 275.00 74,00 50.00 2.00 151.00 VOU~q~ 01/ 11:38 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NLINBER DATE 27330 01/19/96 27330 01119196 27330 01/19/96 27330 01/19/96 27330 01/19/96 27330 01/19/96 27330 01/19/96 27330 01/19/96 27330 01/19/96 27331 01/19/96 27332 01/19/96 27332 01/19/96 27333 01/19/96 27334 01/19/96 27335 01/19/96 2''~' 01/19/96 27~3f 01/19/96 27337 01/19/96 27337 01/19/96 27337 01/19/96 27338 01/19/96 27339 01/19/96 27340 01/19/96 27'340 01/19/96 27341 01/19/96 27342 01/19/96 27343 01/19/96 27344 01/19/96 27345 01/19/96 27346 01/19/96 27347 01/19/96 27'~''~ 01/19/96 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 000206 001282 001282 002042 KUNZE, INC. 001513 001653 MAILER'S SOFTWARE 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 000883 001676 002105 002105 00058Q PHOTO WORKS 000253 POSTMASTER 002185 000254 001264 PRICE COSTCO, INC. 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOU & PLUMB 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C ITEM DESCRIPTION TEMP HELP W/E 12/31 EVANS TENP HELP W/E 12/31 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 12/31 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 12/'51NUTTER TENP HELP W/E 12/31NUTTER TEMP HELP W/E 12/'51NUTTER TEMP HELP W/E 12/31NUTTER TEMP HELP W/E 12/Jl EVANS TEMP HELP WE 12/31 EVANS KINKOrS OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC COPY SUPPLIES KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC CREDIT:NEXT DAY TOOK 3 DAYS RELEASE RETENTION: 1~93-09 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIRS ACCU MAIL SOFTWARE TEMP HELP W/E 1/07 LIPOSCHAK BUSINESS CARDS/POURKAZEMI TAX WINDCY,,/ENVELOPES W/CITY LOGO TAX MONTELEONE EXCAVATING WATER TRUCK-CNTRL BURN PALA RD NEXTEL CO!q4UNICATIORS, DISPATCH RADIOS MOBILE SERVS OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MA%NT. & REPAIR OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING BULK HA/LING POSTMASTER - TEMECULA SPECIAL CALL PICK-UP PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN ADS FOR RECREATION STAFF MEMBERSHIP DUES:l-TRANSFERABLE LIGHTS/GENERATOR-X-HAS PARADE REPAIR CITY BACKFL(34 DEVICES LEGAL MAPS AND DOCUMENTS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-165-999-5118 001-165-999-5118 100-164-604-5118 100-164-604-5250 100-164-604-5118 100-164-604-5118 100-164-604-5118 001-163-999-5118 100-164-604-5118 001-110-999-5220 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 210-2035 190-180-999-5214 320-199-999-5211 100-164-601-5118 001-163-999-5222 001-163-999-5222 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 100-164-601-5401 320-199-999-5209 100-164-601-5214 100-164-601-5214 190-180-999-5250 330-199-999-5Z30 001-120-999-5230 190-180-999-5254 001-140-999-5226 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5212 001-161-502-5224 I TEN AMOUNT 5.52 5.52 5.53 83.20 22.53 22.53 22.54 68.62 133.21 25.91 282.16 15.00- 31,126.85 338.64 221.43 507.52 38.25 2.96 268.22 20.79 660.00 984.00 118.39 15.00 40.50 170. O0 450.00 233.53 30.00 765.38 98.00 70.52 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 646.75 25.91 267.16 31,126.85 338.64 221.43 507.52 330.22 660.00 984.00 133.39 40.50 170.00 450.00 233.53 30.00 765.38 98.00 70.52 VOUCHRE2 01/19/96 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27349 2735O 27351 27352 27353 27354 27354 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27355 27356 27357 27358 27359 11:38 CHECK DATE 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 01/19/96 VENDOR NUMBER OOO266 000418 001897 002124 002133 000519 000519 0003~5 000373 0003?5 0003?5 0003~5 000375 0003~5 0003~5 0003?'5 0003?5 0003?'3 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 002184 00218~ 002016 000345 VENDOR NAME RIGHTWAY RIVERSXDE CO. CLERK & R RONALD L. HARRIS CONSTR SAN DIEGO, CITY OF SOUTH COAST NEWSPAPERS, SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTH COUNTY PEST CORTR SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON SPAGNOLO, DON SPORTS TURF MANAGERS AS TSUTSUMZDA & ASSOCIATES XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ]TEN DESCRIPTION PUMPING SERVICES FOR THE POND APER+URE CARDS DUPLICATES RELEASE RETENTiON PW92-10 RE-ISSUE/INSTALL RADAR POLICE ADS FOR THE CALIFORNIAN PEST CONTROL SERVICES - CITY PEST CONTROL/PARKS/DEC 909 202-5153 GY 909 202-4767 GT 909 202-4767 GT 909 202-4764 Pw BLAZER 909 203-9994 BB 909 205-8688 PW EOC 909 202-4760 JH 909 202-4765 PW MAINT CREW 909-Z02-5208/BH/JAN 909-202-4755/CLTY VAN/JAN 909 202-9876 HP 909-202-4754/KH/JAN 909-202-3800/MW/JAN 909-2029-0934/VAN-JAN 909 205-7877 EOC 909 202-4756 KRTN FOR EOC EMPYEE REIMB:VANCE CORP VS CIT MEMBERSHIP:HARRINGTON DESIGN FOR NEW CITY HALL LEASE FOR COPIER-METER USAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5250 001-163-999-5220 210-2035 001-170-999-5214 280-199-999-5254 340-199-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-150-999-5208 001-161-501-5208 001-161-502-5208 100-164-601-5208 100-164-601-5208 100-164-604-5208 100-164-603-5208 100-164-601-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-1280 190-180-999-5226 210-199-650-5804 330-199-999-5217 ITEM AMOUNT. 50.39 5.00 11,058.04 2,089.81 19.17 42.00 32.00 85.96 29.69 29.69 100.08 45.50 87.33 68.92 63.8~ 49.07 40.12 57.80 57.84 71.89 41.62 45.29 37.74 625.00 75.00 600.00 1,531.21 pAG,'~ CHECK AMOUNT 50.39 5.00 11,058.0~ 2,089.81 19.17 74.00 912.37 625.00 75.00 600.00 1,531.21 TOTAL CHECKS 121,249.61 VOW' R 01 16:11 CXTY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 9 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LO~//NOD SET ASIDE '190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORNATION SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE TOTAL A!qOUNT 54,244.97 9,315.11 625.86 16,421;93 6,935.63 22,784,00 3,890.98 1.17 1,2.:32.87 1,565.75 301.41 3,404.36 563,~7 812.75 389,079.79 510,979.81 VOUCHRE2 01/25/96 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27360 27361 27362 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 614574 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 673561 27366 16:11 CHECK DATE 01/23/96 01/24/96 01/24/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 VENDOR NUMBER 001438 O0O473 001072 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 0007'24 VENDOR NAME MO~REY, JODI CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FXRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FXRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (XRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (XRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (XRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EO0) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING SER DEVEL HOUS CONF:MEYER:1/25-26 2/1/96 INTEREST:TRUST 60310RDA 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEOERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEOERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 000444 000444 SDI 000444 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE SPORTS PROGRAMS AWARDS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-100-999-5250 165-199-999-5261 380-1040 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 :191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 190-183-999-5380 ITEM AMOUNT 50.00 290.00 389,079.79 10,732.04 2,422.01 29.56 2,421.80 92.38 84.43 416.43 214.76 128.52 365.45 104.69 148.08 2,728.70 511.17 14.62 707.39 21.44 23.48 86.46 .24 68.96 22.43 60.72 23.16 72.87 24.36 8.83 42.64 5.11 8.08 2,810.41 585.08 8.91 557.21 17.11 10.68 98.32 37.74 38.17 92.35 17.96 16.46 882.67 CHECK AMOUNT 50.00 290.00 389,079.79 21,501.79 4,379.4--?-... 882. VOLy--'~--~, 01, VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27367 27368 27369 27370 27371 27372 27374 27375 27375 27375 27375 27375 27375 27375 27375 27375 27376 27376 27377 27377 27377 27377 27377 27377 27377 27377 27378 2~---'~ 16:11 CHECK DATE 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 '01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 VENDOR NUMBER 001910 000101 000101 002099 000862 000901 001166 000127 000127 000127 000127 000127 000127 000135 000135 000135 000135 000447 000447 000447 000447 000447 000447 000447 000447 000447 002036 002036 002036 002036 002036 002036 002036 002036 002106 000518 VENDOR NAME AMERITECH CUMMUNICATION APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES CALPELRA C P R S SUPERVISORS' SE CAL DOR SPECIALTIES, IN CALIFORNIAN, INC CALIFORNIAN, INC CALIFORNIAN, INC CALIFORNIAN, INC CALIFORNIAN, INC CALIFORNIAN, INC CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CONTRONIX OF HEHET CONTRONIX OF fiEMET CONTRONIX OF HEMET CONTRONIX OF HEMET CONTRONZX OF HEMET CONTRONIX OF HEMET CONTRONIX OF HEMET CONTRON]X OF HEMET CONTRONIX OF HEMET CONRAD, DENNIE E. CONRAD, DENNIE E. CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION COPIER SERVICE AGREEMENT TEMP HELP W/E 10/14 DARBO TEMP HELP W/E 10/21DARBO ACCOUNT NUMBER 330-199-999-5217 001-110-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 RESTROON RENT/DURING RDA IMPRV 280-199-999-5212 LABOR RELATION CONF:YATES:3/14 001-150-~-5258 AWARDS BANQUET & MTG:2/9:STAFF 190-180-999-5261 SENIOR CENTER REPAIR AND MAINT 190-181-999-5212 AD FOR P~94-15/SAM HICK PRK AD FOR BIDS/WINCH & I15 PUBLIC HEAR AD/OLD TWN SPECIFI PUBLIC HEAR AD/PA95-0103 GFI BID AD/PW95-17 FRONT ST BARRIE BID AD/PW95-06 PVNNT MGNT SYST JOSEPH RD & NICOLAS RD SIGNS TAX D.U.I. CHECKPOINT SIGNS TAX MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT -.RADIOS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT * RADIOS 001-120-~29-5256 001-120-~-5256 001-120-~-5256 001-161-501-5256 001-120-~-5256 001-120-~-5256 100-164-601-52~ 100-164-601-52~4 100-164-601-5244 100-164-601-5244 001-110-999-5250 001-171-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 100-164-604-5250 100-164-601-5250 001-163-999-5250 001-165-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-162-999-5250 REFUND-PARKING CITATION #10116 001-170-4055 REFUND-PARKING CITATION #10116 001-2260 REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL 210-199-650-580~ 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-580/, 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-580/, 210-199-650-580/, DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS ANIMAL CARE SUPPLIES FOR TANGO 001-170-~-5327 ITEM AMOUNT 217,18 185.76 185.76 826.00 75.00 42.00 605.79 51.12 40.47 29.82 32.72 59.73 59.73 60.00 4.65 320.00 24.80' 168.00 252.00 474.00 292.50 544.50 195.00 97.50 474.50 752.50 20.00 5.00 35.08 12.35 28.33 12.35 16.09 28.55 70.90 25.22 82.5O 60.90 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 217.18 371.52 826.00 75.00 42.00 605.79 273.59 409.45 3,250.50 25. O0 228.87 82.50 60.90 VOUCHRE2 01/25/96 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 2738O 2738O 2738O 27381 27382 27383 2738~ 27384 27384 2738~ 273~ 27385 27386 27386 27386 27386 27386 27387 27388 27388 27388 27388 27388 27389 27390 27391 27392 27392 27392 27393 27394 27394 27395 27395 27396 16:11 CHECK DATE 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 VENDOR NUMBER 000165 000165 000165 001810 001135 002122 000184 000184 000184 000184 000184 002160 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 001609 001609 001609 001609 001609 001517 002098 000194 000194 000194 001429 000199 000199 001894 001894 001667 VENDOR NAME FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FINN, DANIEL F & NICOLE FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M FIRST LINE CONSTRUCTION G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES GLENN1ES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GORDON, JOANNE GREATER ALARM COMPANY, GREATER ALARM COMPANY, GREATER ALARM COMPANY, GREATER ALARM COMPANY, GREATER ALARM COMPANY, HARTMANN, JOHN HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS INACOM INFORMATION SYST iNTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC JOHNSON FENCE COMPANY JOHNSON FENCE COMPANY KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIQOS ITEM DESCRIPTION EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAiL SERVICES SALES TAX ASSISTANCE FLU SHOTS/SEPT 95 MASONRY REPAIR FOR CITY PARKS 909-181-1123/GENERAL USAGE 909-694-1993/GENERAL USAGE 909-694-4353/PALA PARK 909-694-4354/PALA PARK 909-695-3564/ALARM REPAIR ROLL SHADE AT CRC OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES REFUND-TRANSFERED CLASS ALARM MONITORING NEW CITY HALL ALARM MONITORING * STORAGE ALARM MONITORING - MAINT, YARD ALARM MONITORING - MAINT, YARD ALARM MONITORING - MAINT. YARD REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGN REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 000199 IRS GARN 000199 IRS GARN CRC/INSTALL 4 BARRICADES POST CRC MAINTENANCE POOL EQUIPMENT TEMP HELP W/E 01/14 EVANS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5230 001-110-999-5230. 001-162-999-5230 001-2030 001-2640 190-180-999-5212 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 190-182-999-5212 330-199-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-181-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-183-4982 340-199-999-5250 340-199-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 100-164-601-5250 001-162-999-5250 190-2900 001-150-999-5250 001-170-999-5214 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 320-199-999-5221 001-2140 100-2140 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-163-999-5118 ITEM AMOUNT 20.62 25.23 22.25 200.70 115.00 783.33 544.66 1,063.42 28.89 29.35 52.80 280.00 64.22 48.49 36.37 278.00 37.24 35.00 90.00 35.00 30.00 37.50 7.50 100.00 345.05 19,24 1,020.78 187.83 452.78 320.37 154.91 154.90 280.00 539.00 99.01 CHECK AMOUNT 68.10 200.70 115.00 783.33 1,719.12 280.00 35.00 200.00 100.00 345.05 19.24 1,661.39 320.37 309.81 819.0J~ VOV '~ 01. VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27396 27397 27397 27398 27399 27400 27401 27402 27402 27403 27403 27403 27~ 27404 27404 27404 27404 27404 27404 27404 27405 27406 27407 27407 27408 27409 27410 27411 27412 27412 27412 2 16:11 CHECK DATE 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC 001534 LA HASTERS OF FiNE TRAV 000669 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES 000482 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, 001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL 001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 000228 MOBIL, iNC. 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI 001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL 001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES 001150 O'BRIEN, CARY 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. PALONAR GRADING & PAVIN 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION TEMP HELP W/E 01/14 EVANS MISC COPY SUPPLIES MISC COPY SUPPLIES MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 5 YEAR SERVICE AWARDS 96 DUES:PURSUANT TO ART VII PROF SRVCS/MORAGA RD WIDENING INTERIM FIRE STATION - RENT INTERIM FIRE STATION - RENT LUNCH FOR MEETING 1/18 1ST RESPONSE TRAINING BRK CITY COUNCIL MTG 01-Z]-96 LETTERHEAD STATIONARY TAX BUSINESS CARDS:BJORKLUND TAX BUSINESS CARDS:T MILLER BUSINESS CARDS:D. HILLBERG TAX BUSINESS CARDS:G t4OLNICK TAX BUSINESS CARDS:M. SALAZAR FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FOR THE CiTY BASKETBALL ASSIGNMENT FEES BASKETBALL TEAM FORFEIT FEES CONM DEVEL BLOCK GRANT AD REPAIR PED BARRIER/CHAIN FENCE TEAMBUILDING DEBRIEF 1/10/96 REFUND-OVRPMT ON PLANS & SPECS 000246 PER REDE 000246 PER REDE 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-164-604-5118 330-199-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 190-182-999-5212 001-150-999-5265 001-100-999-5226 210-165-625-5804 001-171-999-5470 001-171-9~9-5470 001-110-999-5260 001-150-999-5261 001-100-999-5260 001-170-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-161-501-5220 001-110-999-5222 001-110-999-5222 001-110-999-5222 001-110-999-5222 001-162-999-5222 001-170-999-5262 001-100-999-5226 190-183-999-5380 190-18~-999-5380 001-140-999-5254 100-164-601-5402 001-150-999-5248 001-199-4053 001-21]0 100-2130 001-2.S90 100-2~90 165-2390 ITEM AMOUNT 192.19 7.28 · 23.65 112.91 3,000.00 100.00 354,00 600.00 600.00 29.25 32.50 80.00 46.06 3.57 205.00 15.88 110.44 38.25 2.96 38.25 2.96 41.21 36.91 2,116.00 72.00 80.00 29.82 700.00 664.00 10.00 191.61 65.19 13,126.16 2,374.73 82.54 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 291.20 30.93 112.91 3,000.00 100.00 354.00 1,200.00 141.75 504.58 36.91 2,116.00 152.00 29.82 700.00 664.00 10.00 VOUCHRE2 01/25/96 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 16:11 CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS PET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 00024'6 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 27413 01/25/96 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 27414 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000253 000253 000253 000253 000253 000255 000255 000546 27415 27415 27415 27415 27415 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER PRO LOCK & KEY PRO LOCK & KEY RADIO SHACK 27416 27416 27417 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAiL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-2390 191-?.390 192-2590 193-2590 280-2590 300-2590 320-2590 330-2590 340-2390 001-2590 100-2590 165-2590 190-2390 191-2590 192-2390 193-2590 194-2390 280-2590 300-2390 320-2390 330-2590 340-2390 100-2122 001-162-999-5242 001-161-501-5260 001-162-999-5220 001-110-999-5260 001-150-999-5261 001-165-999-5262 190-183-999-5320 001-161-502-5262 001-161-501-527'2 001-161-502-5260 001-162-999-5260 340-199-999-5242 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 001-162-999-5220 001-140-999-5230 001-120-999-5250 100-164-604-5250 001-161-501*5230 001-110-999-5230 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 320-1~-~9-5221 ITEM AMOUNT 2,697.09 94;44 111.05 324.86 226.2~ 106.83 282,54 109.73 349.87 -50.39 9.52 .23 11.86 .47 .93 1.39 .93 .46 .93 2.09 51.70 23.95 38,54 89.88 34.75 22.62 27.04 38.53 14,69 17,00 16.75 8.00 10.86 28.50 40.00 20.65 17.25 62.40 25.75 10.75 15.00 35.00 100.43 84.14 PAF CHECK AMOUNT 20,22? 51.70 431.76 131,15 VOV"~"'~ 01. VOUCHER/ CHECK NUHBER 27418 27418 27418 27419 27420 27420 27420 27421 27421 27421 27422 27422 27423 27424 27~.~ 27425 27425 27426 27426 27426 27426 27426 27426 27427 27427 27427 27427 27427 27427 27428 27429 27430 27430 27430 27430 16:11 CHECK DATE 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 '01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 VENDOR NUMBER 0008~6 0008~6 000836 000947 000262 000262 000262 000426 000426 000426 000526 000266 000266 000266 000266 000271 000271 001942 001942 001942 001942 001942 001942 000704 000704 000704 000704 000704 000704 001872 001~0 000926 000926 000926 000926 000926 VENDOR NAME RANCH MUFFLER SPECIALIS RANCH MUFFLER SPECIALIS RANCH MUFFLER SPECIALIS RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL REFSDAL, JAN W. & HEIDI REFSDAL, JAN W. & HEIDI REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY 0 RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST & ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST & S C SIGNS S C SIGNS S C SIGNS S C SIGNS S C SIGNS S C SIGNS S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/1NLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, XNC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, XNC/INLAND OIL SALAZAR, MARIANNE SOFTWARE HOUSE INT'L, Z SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]OOS ITEM DESCRIPTION VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR/SUPPLIES LABOR TAX BLUEPRINTS REPOGRAPHICS VARIOUS LOCATIONS VARIOUS LOCATIONS VARIOUS LOCATIONS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - PARKS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - PARKS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - PARKS REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT & RENT REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT & RENT LAND USE LAW CONF:1/26:MILLER PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PLAN CHECK SRVCS/OCT 95 PLAN CHECK SRVCS/NOV 95 PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS & POSTINGS PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS & POSTINGS PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS & POSTINGS POSTINGS FOR NOTICE OF P,H, PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS & POSTINGS POSTINGS FOR NOTICE OF P.H, FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES REIMB:CODE ENFORCE CERT TRAIN MISC CUMPUTER SUPPLIES VARIOUS LOCATIONS VARIOUS LOCATIONS VARIOUS LOCATIONS VARIOUS LOCATIONS VARIOUS LOCATIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 330-199-~-5220 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-183-4990 190-2900 001-161-501-5272 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-52~8 190-180-999-52~8 190-180-999-5238 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 001-161-501-5256 001-161-501-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-161-501-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-161-501-5256 100-164-601-5263 001-165-999-5263 100-164-604-5263 001-162-999-5263 001-110-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 001-162-999-5261 320-199-999-5221 190-182-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 192-180-999-5319 193-180-999-5240 ITEM AMOUNT 360.00 40.00 27.90 18.32 798.32 47.07 2,841.42 44.80 50.19 11.85 80.00 100.00 235.00 125.78 62.89 188.66 172.50 362.82 282.25 450.00 200.00 65.00 390.00 65.00 190.00 374.86 43.98 109.30 63.38 37.03 192.62 80.00 166.24 89.62 33.12 6,629.40 22,553.43 69.11 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 427.90 18.32 3,686.81 106.8~ 180.00 235.00 549.83 645.07 1,360.00 821.17 80.00 166.24 29,374.68 VOUCHRE2 01/25/96 16:11 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAC/ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 27431 27431 27432 27432 27432 27432 27432 27432 27432 27432 27432 27432 27433 27434 27435 27435 27435 27436 27437 27438 27439 27439 27439 27439 27440 27441 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 001212 001212 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 0003~ 00037'3 001546 001497 000305 000305 000305 002177 000307 000306 002111 002111 002111 002111 000320 00201& SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON STRAIGHT LINE GLASS T'R W, INC.-INFORMATXON TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TEMECULA SISTER CITIES TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & TOGO~S TOGO~S TOGO~S TOGO~S TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES 07-8272-901-5751-9/CRC 07-8274-036-1451-3/SEN CENTER 909-202-4752-SN 909-202-4769/JS 909-202-4204/KL 909-202-4763/PB 909 202-4762 RP 909-202-4758/RR 909-202-4770/RB 909-202-4757-JG/JAN 909 205-7826 GR 909-202-4759/AE/JAN MAINT/REPAXRS CRC CREDIT REPTS FOR RDA LOANS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES DECORATIONS/BREAKFAST W/SANTA BREAKFAST WITH SANTA ITEMS FAREWELL DINNER FOR NAKAYAMA GAVELS w/LOGO MAINT/REPAIR OF PARK/REC FAC. LUNCH TEAMBLDG DEBRIEF 1/10/96 LUNCH TEAMBLDG FIRE 1/17/96 LUNCH TEAMBLDG POLICE 1/17/96 1ST RESPONSE TRAINING LUNCH MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY HALL SPACE PLAN:l/I-15 27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 27443 27443 27443 27443 27443 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 190-182-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-180-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 001-120-999-5208 001-140-999-5208 001-162-999-5208 190-180-999-5212 280-199-999-5250 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 001-100-999-5280 001-100-999-5220 190-180-999-5212 001-110-999-5261 001-171-999-5261 001-170-999-5261 001-150-999-5261 001-163-999-5220 210-199-650-5804 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 269.06 186.33 ?8.97 91.90 58.86 32.79 178.01 81.67 50.97 43.14 134.24 60.81 50.00 50.00 112.18 30.89 108.74 1,042.97 50.62 130.37 57.20 49.50 49.50 45.00 86.06 650.00 6,288.32 164.34 629.79 57.20 5.00 312.50 87.50 228.40 82.80 399.66 47.88 75.7O 455.39 811.36 50.00 SO.O0 251.8L 1,042. 50.62 130.37 201.20 86.06 650.00 7,5~.65 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27444 27444 27444 27444 27445 27446 27447 16:11 CHECK DATE 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 01/25/96 VENDOR NUMBER 000325 000325 000325 000325 001342 001857 002186 VENDOR NAME UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WELLS FARGO BANK NATL A ZUNA, PAUL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 U~ BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOUR $25 SAVING BONDS-BIKE PGM BOOT ALLOWANCE FOR 1995 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 280-2120 190-182-999-5212 001-2270 001-162-999-5243 ITEM AMOUNT 67.24 10.96 15.00 .30 286.14 100.00 '95.00 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 93.50 286.14 100.00 95.00 TOTAL CHECKS 510,979.81 VOUCHRE2 02/01/96 16:21 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CQNMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE TOTAL AMOUNT 5,452.69 3,822.33 4,114.77 3.12 29,503.65 1,208.43 18,007.15 2,249.57 416.25 11~761.76 559,617.39 636,157.11 02, 16:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 27470 01/30/96 000718 27471 01/30/96 000740 27472 01/31/96 002193 27473 01/31/96 002005 280796 02/01/96 001072 612404 01/29/96 001300 612404 01/29/96 001300 612404 01/29/96 001300 612404 01/29/96 001300 27476 02/01/96 001674 27477 02/01/96 002194 27477 02/01/96 002194 274,Z_78. 02/01/96 001876 ~ 02/01/96 27480 02/01/96 27481 02/01/96 000123 27482 02/01/96 000588 27483 02/01/96 27484 02/01/96 27484 02/01/96 27485 02/01/96 27485 02/01/96 000138 27486 02/01/96 000144 27487 02/01/96 000146 27488 02/01/96 000155 27488 02/01/96 000155 27488 02/01/96 000155 27489 02/01/96 27490 02/01/96 001165 2 02/01/96 001002 VENDOR NAME NATIONAL RECREATION &PA PICCA DELl GRAHAM COMPANY BUILDING ENERGY CONSULT BANK OF ANERICA NT & SA FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT ADKINS, ROBERT STEVEN AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. BE]JING LONGEVITY, ]NC. BELISLE, CHARLOTTE BONILLA, SILVIA BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS C C A P A CONFERENCE 002077 CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY 0 001139 CHIP MORTON PHOTOGRAPHY 001139 CHIP MORTON PHOTOGRAPHY 000138. CITICORP NORTH AMERICA CITICORP NORTH AMERICA COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPOR COUNTS UNLIMITED DAVLIN DAVLIN DAVL]N EDWARDS, SALLY ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATI FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MEMBERSHIP:H. PARKER LUNCH:SOUTHWEST TOUR MEETING INSPECT:EMERGENCY LIGHT SYSTEM RELEASE RETENTION:PWO\95-O1CSD RDA DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 2/1 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5226 001-110-999-5260 190-182-999-5250 210-2035 380-1040 4TH QTR PMT OF UNEMPLOY INSURA 001-2350 4TH QTR PMT OF UNEMPLOY INSURA 100-2350 4TH QTR PMT OF UNEMPLOY INSURA 190-2350 4TH QTR PMT OF UNEMPLOY [NSURA 280-2350 TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS PUB:ZONING NEWS/THONNHILL PUB:ZONING NEWS/THONNHILL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT APPROVED BY CLAIM ADJUSTER:JUL CONF:LEGISLATIVE:NAASEH:2/16 PUB:WEED HANDBOOK-PARK NAINT COPY PHOTO OF NEW ARTWORK COPY PHOTO OF NEW ART WORK 190-183-999-5330 001-161-502-5228 001-161-501-5228 190-183-999-5330 190-2900 190-2900 300-199-999-5246 001-161-502-5261 19G-180-999-5228 280-199-999-5270 280-199-999-5270 LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM 320-2800 LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM 320-199-999-5391 REFRESHMENTS:TV SHOW TRIP TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAM 3RD QTR RECORDINGS OF PC MEETINGS DUPLICATION SERVS:COUNCIL MTGS BROADCAST OF COUNCIL MTG 1/25 REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT FUNDRAISING:ENTERTAIN BOOKS 96 5473-6664-0391-0198/MJM 190-183-999-5350 100-164-602-5406 001-161-501-5250 001-100-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 190-2900 190-183-4980 001-110-999-5258 ITEM AMOUNT 215.00 53.88 125.00 27,760.00 559,617.39 1,114.54 567.94 1,344.59 178.28 84.00 25.00 25.00 96.00 100.00 50.00 18,007.15 55.00 71.50 91.59 188.56 1,371.20 56.37 100.00 800.00 146.66 796.2~ 890.62 100.00 60.00 390.00 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 215.00 53.88 125.00 27,760.00 559,617.39 3,205.35 8~.00 50.00 96.00 100.00 50.00 18,007.15 55.00 71.50 280.15 1,427.57 100.00 800.00 1,833.51 100.00 60.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 02/01196 16:21 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 27491 02/01/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 54T$-6664-O391-O198/MJM 001-110-999-5260 27492 02/01/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN CYBE'X'REBODT Zl/CUMPUTER SUPPL 320-199-999-5221 27492 02/01/96 001989 FOX NETWC)RK SYSTEMS, IN FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 27492 02/01/96 001989 FOX NETMORK SYSTEMS, IN TAX 320-199-999-5221 14.59 350.00 15.00 27.13 404.59 392.13 27493 02/01/96 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-3526 FIRE ALARM CITY 320-199-999-5208 27493 02/01/96 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909 693-0956 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5Z08 27493 02/01/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4356 K.HINTERGARDT MEN 320-199-999-5208 27493 02/01/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-2475 PUBLIC WORK 100-16~-601-5208 27493 02/01/96 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-7945 CRC FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 80.29 27.21 28.71 39.59 52.51 228.31 27494 02/01/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR SERVICES 001-170-999-5214 27494 02/01/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR SERVICES 001-170-999-5214 100.00 100.00 2OO.O0 27495 02/01/96 002108 GEOSOILS, INC STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 001-1280 129.00 129.00 27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802 27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802 27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802 27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802 27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802 27497 02/01/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 27497 02/01/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 27497 02/01/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 27497 02/01/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT M[SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 100.00 500.00 456.78 300.00 342.00 200.04' 59,17 88.36 66.41 1,698 413.98 27498 02/01/96 001697 HALL, NANCY LEE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 180.00 180.00 27499 02/01/96 HODGE, ALFRED & ANNAMAR OVERCHARGE:TCSD RATES 95/96 190-180-999-5375 27499 02/01/96 HODGE, ALFRED & ANNAMAR OVERCHARGE:TCSO RATES 95/96 191-180-999-5375 51.66 3.12 54.78 27500 02/01/96 001158 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL:PERMITS PLUS:HAFELI:2/8 320-199-999-5261 65.00 65.00 27501 02/01/96 001429 INACON INFORMATION SYST NETMANAGE CHAMELEON INTERNET 320-199-999-5221 176.15 176.15 27502 02/01/96 002170 INDENTICATOR CORPORATIO FINGERPRINT REPLACEMENT KIT 001-170-999-5242 27502 02/01/96 002170 INDENTICATOR CORPORATIO FREIGHT 001-170-999-5242 27502 02/01/96 002170 INDENTICATOR CORPORATIO TAX 001-170-999-5242 27503 02/01/96 KAITA, TERESA REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION 190-183-4980 27504 02/01/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 1/21 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 27504 02/01/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 1/21 EVANS 100-16~-604-5118 27505 02/01/96 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE MISC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218 27505 02/01/96 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPL[E TAX 100-164-601-5218 27506 02/01/96 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218 360.00 6.88 27.90 17.50 99.01 192.19 82.00 6.36 42.24 394.78 17.50 291.20 88.36 47 16:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27507 27508 27509 27510 27511 27511 27512 27512 27512 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 02/01/96 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV 02/01/96 LLYOD, PATTI M 02/01/96 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERXNG 02/01/96 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 02/01/96 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. 02/01/96 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. 02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 27512 '02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 27512 02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 27513 02/01/96 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 27514 02/01/96 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. ~ ,.02/01/96 MULHALL, TERRY 27b~b 02/01/96 002088 OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER 27517 02/01/96 002190 PACIFIC INLAND CAPITAL 27518 02/01/96 001243 PALMQUIST, MARY 27519 02/01/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 27520 02/01/96 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC. 27520 02/01/96 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC. 27521 02/01/96 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. 27522 02/01/96 000926 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON 27523 02/01/96 000752 STONE, JEFFREY E. 27524 02/01/96 STRICKLAND, KATIE 27525 02/01/96 000305 TARGET STORE 27526 02/01/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 27527 02/01/96 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE 27528 02/01/96 001939 WINDSOR PROJECTS, INC. 2 02/01/96 000347 ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AIRFARE:ECON DEV CONF:MCLARNEY REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION REIMB FOR LOST COFFEE POT TENP HELP W/E 1/14 LIPOSCHAK CITY EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS TAX BUSINESS CARDS:FRONT RECEPTION BUSINESS CARDS:S. JONES TAX BUSINESS CARDS/IRENE ROBERS TAX REPAIR UNDER"SIDEWALK DRAIN FILM, CARDS, PROCESSING REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION TYPEWRITER REPAIR MARKET RENTAL SURVEY - HONDA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS BLUEPRINT CIP PRJT PW95-15 PARTS FOR STENCIL TRUCK TAX LEAGUE CONF: ROBERTS 1/11-1/12 2-02-351-5489/28781 FRONT ST LEAGUE CONF:STONE 11/29-12/3 REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION SR CENTER MISC SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS FEB 95 RENT: JAN 95 CAM MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRST AID KIT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-110-999-5258 190-183-4982 001-100-~-5260 100-164-601-5118 001-150-~99-5222 001-150-~-5222 001-120-~-5222 001-120-~-5222 001-120-~-5222 190-180-~-5222 190-180-~9-5222 100-164-601-5402 330-199-999-52T7 190-183-4982 001-150-999-5242 280-199-999-5248 190-183-999-5330 210-165-658-5802 100-164-601-5218 100-164-661-5218 001-100-999-5258 100-164-601-5240 001-100-999-5258 190-183-4980 190-181-999-5301 100-164-604-5220 190-183-999-5330 340-199-999-52~4 001-162-999-5242 ITEM AMOUNT 81.00 70.00 33.28 634.40 262.00 20.31 38.25 102.50 10.90 38.25 2.96 600.00 416.25 70.00 55.00. 750.00 423.20 44.87 665.13 51.55 30.00 113.44 17.34 42.00 32.31 27.49 840.80 11,761.76 53.82 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOJNT 81.00 70.00 33.28 634.40 282.31 192.86 600.00 416.25 70.00 .55.00 750.00 423.20 44.87 716.68 30.00 113.44 17.34 42.00 32,31 27.49 840.80 11,761.76 53.82 TOTAL CHECKS 636,157.11 VOUCHRE2 01/25/96 16:35 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS Pt FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LO~,//MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP TOTAL AMOUNT 84,410,70 1,479.14 2,2.39.15 25,627.90 18,669.33 19,547.85 10,055.65 162,029.72 V( 01, /6 16:35 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 27450 02/13/96 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 002158 A S A P SERVICES INC. 27451 02/13/96 002093 27451 02/13/96 002093 27453 02/13/96 000638 27453 02/13/96 000638 27453 02/13/96 000638 27454 02/13/96 27455 02/13/96 27455 02/13/96 BERRYMAN AND HENIGAR BERRYMAN AND. HENIGAR CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS 002182 D K S ASSOCIATES 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE 27456 02/13/96 000164 27456 02/13/96 000164 27456 02/13/96 000164 27457 02/13/96 27457 02/13/96 2~ 02/13/96 2 02/13/96 274~d 02/13/96 27459 02/13/96 27460 02/13/96 27461 02/13/96 27461 02/13/96 27462 02/13/96 27463 02/13/96 27463 02/13/96 27464 02/13/96 27465 02/13/96 27465 02/13/96 27466 02/13/96 27467 02/13/96 27467 02/13/96 27468 02/13/96 27468 02/13/96 ESGIL CORPORATION ESGIL CORPORATION ESGIL CORPORATION 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 000711 000711 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES 002187 LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. 000220 MAURZCE PRINTERS, INC. 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. 000270 R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S 001483 TOM DOOSON & ASSOCIATES 002016 TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES 002016 TSUTSUHIDA & ASSOCIATES 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC[ATI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION STRIPING/SANTA GERTRUDIS TRAIL PROF SRVCS/TAX CONSULTANTS CREDIT:EXCEEDS DEPOSIT AMOUNT SMI 4TH QTR REPORT 1995 SMI 4TH QTR REPORT 1995 SMI 4TH QTR REPORT 1995 OCT SERVS/I-15 CORRIDOR STUDY LANDSCAPE REVIEWS CREDIT:OVERCHARGED PLAN CHECK PLAN CHECK SRVCS/OCT 95 PLAN CHECK SRVCS/DEC PLAN CHECK SRVCS/DEC 95 LANDSCAPE MAINT/TCSD SLOPES LANDSCAPE MAINT/SPORTS PARK TCSD RECREATION BROCHURE CRC INFORMATION BROCHURES TAX POLICE MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS ANIMAL CONTROL SRVCS/DEC 95 REDEVELOPMENT NEWSLETTER NEWSLETTER MAILING VEHICLE MAINT/PUBLIC WORKS PROF SRVCS/RDA CONSULTING/DEC PROF SRVCS/RDA CONSULTING/DEC PROF SRVCS PARKVIEW SITE BOOKING FEES OCT 95 ACIIS 3RD/4TH QTR PROF SRVCS/FIRST ST BRIDGE CITY HALL SPACE PLAN:l/I-15 CITY HALL SPACE PLAN:l/I-15 PLAN CHECK SRVCS/OCT 95 PLAN CHECK SRVCS/TRACT 27827 ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-190-142-5804 280-2645 280-2645 001-2280 001-2290 001-162-4229 210-165-633-5802 001-161-501-5250 001-161-501-5250 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 001-170-999-5214 001-172-999-5255 280-199-999-5264 280-199-999-5230 100-164-601-5214 280-199-999-5248 165-199-999-5248 210-190-138-5802 001-170-999-527'5 001-170-999-5325 280-199-807-5802 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-580~ 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 4,046.36 2,125.00 500.00- 1,142.31 1,642.35 139.23- 5,368.99 1,050.00 247.50- 21,876.33 1,500.45 1,351.80 18,669.33 7,605.64 15,618.36 2,231.00 172.90 ' 2,221.92 3,630.28 4,269.00 750.00 1,47g.14 2,239.15 2,239.15 5,500.00 10,156.80 18,076.60 1,172.50 442.50 3,020.00 3,7'37.98 5,787.57 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 4,046.36 1,625.00 2,645.43 5,368.99 802.50 24,T28.58 26,274.97 18,022.26 2,221.92 3,630.28 5,019.00 1,479.14 4,478.30 5,500.00 28,233.40 1,172.50 3,462.50 VOUCHRE2 01/25/96 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27468 27468 27468 27468 27469 16:35 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI 000379 W DEAN DAVIDSON CO. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION PLAN CHECK SRVCS/TRACT 22716 PLAN CHECK SRVCS/NOV 95 PLAN CHECK SRVCS/DEC 95 OVRCHGED PLAN CK SERV/B95-1463 PROF SRVCS/PARK RESTROOMS TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248- 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 210-190-146-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 6,631.70 4,413.40 1,727.94 150.00- 1,170.00 CHECK AMOUNT 22,148.59 1,170.00 162,029.72 17:12 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND TOTAL AMOUNT 33,851.84 19,758.00 2,833.25 335,152.23 11,392.83 1,438.70 404,426.85 VOUCHRE2 02/01/96 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 27532 27532 27532 27532 27532 27532 27532 27533 27533 27534 27534 27535 27536 27536 27536 27537 27537 27538 27539 27540 27541 27542 27542 17:12 CHECK DATE 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 02/13/96 VENDOR NUMBER 000123 000123 000123 0001Z3 000123 000123 0001Z3 001945 001945 002129 002129 000202 001982 001982 001982 000944 000944 001713 000406 002021 000329 001342 001342 VENDOR NAME BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I L WILLIAHS LANDSCAPE, I L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY, MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY, NORRIS-REPKE, INC. RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S SELF#S JANITORIAL SERVI URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, IN WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PROF LEGAL SERVS:GENERAL PROF LEGAL SERVS: GEM.& CLAIM PROF LEGAL SERVS: GEM & CLAIM PROF LEGAL SERVS: RDA AGENCY PROF LEGAL SERVS:RETAINER INCORRECT HRLY RATE:BC LEROY INCORRECT HR RATE:D R DEGRAFF RETENTION: PYMT #7:SPORTS PARK PROG PYMT 7 SPORTS PARK PARKVIEW SITE:PW95-09 RETENTION NO. 1:PARKVIEW SITE DESIGN SRVCS:SPORTS PARK TREE TRIMMING CITY-WlDE/RGT-WY TREE TRIMMING CITY-WlDE:RGT WY EMERGENCY TREE TRIMMINNG TRAFFIC SIGNAL CTRL SOFTWARE TAX ENG SERVS FOR FIRST ST EXTENSI BOOKING FEES/NOV 95 JAN 95 RESTROOM MAINT SERVS DESIGN GUIDELINES BLDG MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES BLDG MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES · TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 280-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 210-2035 210-190;137-5804 210-190-626-5804 210-2035 210-190-137-5802 100-164-601-5402 100-164-601-5402 100-164-601-5402 210-165-643-5804 210-165-643-5804 280-199-807-5802 001-170-999-5273 190-180-999-5250 001-161-502-5248 190-182-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 4,500.00 14,166;92 1,438.70 4,042.93. 1,326.92 330.00- 2.00- 23,146.46' 231',464.53 131,204.64 13,120.46' 3,055.39 16,880.00 1,688.00 1,190.00 5,285.00 409.59 7,349.90 11,040.00 1,494.00 3,150.00 339.25 1,000.00 CHECK AMOUNT 25,143.47 208,318.07 118,084.18 3,055.39 19,758.00 5,694 7,349.90 11,040.00 1,494.00 3,150.00 1,339.25 404,426.85 ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance February 13, 1996 City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1995 PREPARED BY: Steve Oakley, Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1995. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of December 31, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1995 2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of December 31, 1995 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of December 31, 1995 Cash Activity for the Month of December: Cash and Investments as of December 1, 1995 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of December 31, 1995 $ 52,075,049 2,613,455 (4, 187,550) $ 50,500,954 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Reserve Account-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Construction Fund-RDA Bonds Reserve Account-RDA Bonds Institution Yield City Hall First Interstate First Interstate State Treasurer 5.748 % ICMA PEBSCO PEBSCO Bank of America 5.408 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 Bank of America 5.408 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.210 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 Balance $ 800 84,659 3,726 36,089,090 289,439 420, 168 29,565 17,477 502,690 728,420 10,886,000 1,448,920 $ 50,500,954 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. City of Temecula Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances As of December 31,1995 c~y (1) Asse~s: Cash end investments $ 30,502,001 $ Receivables 2,850,189 Due from other funds 542,393 Land held for resale 918,171 Fixed assets-net 458,941 Total assets $ 35,271,695 $ Cornmurlit¥ Services Redevelopmerit District Agency 221,137 $ 19,777,816 $ 122,300 197,862 2,103,053 343,437 $ 22,078,731 $ Total: 50,500,954 3,170,351 542,393 3,021,224 458,941 57,693,863 Liabilities and fund equity: Liabilities: Due to other funds $ 509,593 Other liabilities 3,527,793 $ Total liabilities 4,037,386 =und equity: Contributed capital 1,055,344 Retained earnings 545,165 Fund balances: Reserved (2) 5,512,755 Designated (3) 19,628,418 Undesignated 4,492,627 Total fund equity 31,234,309 Total liabilities and fund equity $ 35,271,695 $ 104,954 104,954 $ 32,800 $ 61,799 94,599 893,173 6,675,507 15,308,625 (654,690) 238,483 21,984,132 : 343,437 $ 22,078,731 542,393 3,694,546 4,236,939 1,055,344 545,165 13,081,435 34,937,043 3,637,937 53,456,924 57,693,863 (1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deferred comp agency funds. (2) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod housing, and debt service. (3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service and continuing appropriations. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk February 13, 1996 Records Destruction Approval APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code. The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. Exhibit A details Public Works (Retention Code 80605) from 6/7/93 (93004) to 1/10/94 (93007), a Plot Plan (Retention Code 80605)7/9/90 (00001), and Parcel Maps (Retention Code 80605 from 10/17/90 (00003) to 12/28/93 (23248-2). Exhibit B details Tract Maps (Retention Code 20301 ) from 9/29/66 (03552) to 4/17/90 (21760), Plot Plans (Retention Code 20324) from 12/6/84 (-8231)to 9/13/85 (08769), and a Parcel Merger (Retention Code 20319)5/28/82 (14933). These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Public Works Department and one in permanent off-site storage. These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibits "A" and "B" as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Exhibit B JSG FROM: DATE: ExhIBIT A City Clerk Paula Sargent Office T~echnician February 13, 1996 Destruction of Records Request Attached is a print out of.' Public Works (Retention Code 80605) from 6/7/93 (93004) to 1/10/94 (93007), a Plot Plan (Retention Code 80605) 7/9/90 (00001), and Parcel Maps (Retention Code 80605) from 10/17/90 (00003) to 12/28/93 (23248-2). These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Public Works Department and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. Department Head: '~J2--- .. · oseph Kicak, .Public Works Department City Attorney: R:~fonns~iostn~t.tqs RRDES~...RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 163 Page 1 01/24/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 80605 10:22:21 Destruction Date. 02/13/1996 D, Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media R~ Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 163 07/09/1990 00001 Plot Plan 00001 80605 0063 Film 3821~41A0001 Group I 163/120/%~1e Vault 163 10/17/1990 00003 Parcel Merger 3 80605 0072 Film 3821MIA0002 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 06/07/1993 93004 Public Works 93-004 80605 0075 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/="ne Vault 163 06/29/1993 93010 Public Works 93-010 80605 0076 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/01/1993 93012 Public Works 93-012 80605 0076 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/28/1993 23248 Parcel Mep 23248-2 80605 0073 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 01/10/1994 93007 Public Works 93-07 80605 0049 Film 3821MIA0002 Group I 163/120/The Vault 7 Records Processed TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: I~rRIBIT B City Clerk Paula Sargent Office Technician February 13, 1996 Destruction of Records Request Attached is a print out of: Tract Maps (Retention Code 20301) from 9/29/66 (03552) to 4/17/90 (21760), Plot Plans (Retention Code 20324) from 12/6/84 (08231) to 9/13/85 (08769), and a Parcel Merger (Retention Code 20319) 5/28/82 (14933). These records have been microffimed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Public Works Department and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. Department Head: City Attorney: G~~o" "~arUnent R:\form~\dggtu~t.rq, RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 161 Page 1 01/23/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code.., 20301 08:06:53 Destruction Date. 02/13/1996 De Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Re~ Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage ~ocation Location Reference 161 09/29/1966 03552 Tract 03552 20301 0077 Film 3821/~lA0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/22/1966 03583 Tract 03583 20301 0077 Film 3821HIA0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/04/1968 03646 Tract 03646 20301 0077 Film 3821~[1A0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/04/1968 03713 Tract 03713 20301 0077 Film 3821H1A0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/12/1969 03883 Tract 03883 20301 0077 Film 3821H1A0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/07/1969 03869 Tract 03869 20301 0077 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 07/28/1972 03587 Tract 03587 20301 0077 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 07/28/1975 07402 Tract 07402 20301 0077 Film 3821HIA0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 16, ,/13/1976 07401 Tract 07401 20301 0077 Film 3821HiA0001 Group I 161/120/T~e Vault 161 12/04/1978 12005 Tract 12005 20301 0077 Film 3821M1A0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 12/09/1980 12005 Tract 12005-1 20301 0077 Film 3821MIA0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 09/21/1982 12005 Tract 12005-2 20301 0077 Film 3821M1A0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 04/17/1990 21760 Tract 21760 20301 0077 Film 3821M1A0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault 13 Records Processed RRDESTY..,RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 161 Page 1 01/23/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 20324 07:57:23 Destruction Date. 02/13/1996 ~ Doc. Item Rat. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere. 161 12/06/1984 08231 Plot Plan 08231 20324 0077 Film 3821MIA0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 06/21/1985 08632 Plot Plan 08632 20324 0077 Film 3821MiA0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 08/28/1985 08784 Plot Plan 08784 20324 0077 Film 3821M1A0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 09/13/1985 08769 Plot Pla~ 08769 20324 0077 Film 3821M1A0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault 4 Records Processed RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 161 Page 1 01/23/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 20319 08:01:11 ~- Destruction Date. 02/13/1996 D Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media ReI. Dace Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 161 05/28/1982 14933 Parcel Merger 14933 20319 0077 Film 3821MIA0002 Group I 161/120/The Vault i Records Processed APPROVAL~ CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance February 13, 1996 Property Insurance Renewal PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analysl~/ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the City of Temecula Property Insurance Policy renewal with Reliance Insurance Company, Hartford Steam Boiler, and Pacific Insurance Company, Ltd./Agricultural Insurance for the period of February 26, 1996 through February 26, 1997 in the amount of $73,260; and, 2. Appropriate $ 26,600from the Insurance Internal Service Fund Retained Earnings to the Property Insurance Account. DISCUSSION: The City's insurance policy with Aetna Insurance Company expires on February 26, 1996. In June 1995, the City was put on notice that upon the expiration of this current policy, which includes earthquake insurance coverage in the amount of $7.5 million, Aetna will only carry earthquake insurance in the amount of $2.5 million, leaving the City $5 million under the City Council's previously directed level of earthquake insurance coverage. Consequently, staff directed the City's property insurance broker, Barney & Barney, to market the City's property insurance policy. In response to this request, Barney & Barney conducted a comprehensive inventory of all City buildings and property requiring coverage, and obtained three qualified proposals for basic property insurance from the following companies in the amounts listed. Additionally, Barney & Barney has provided a proposal for earthquake and flood insurance from Pacific Insurance Company Ltd./Agricultural Insurance Company, and a proposal for equipment floater insurance from Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company: INSURANCE CARRIER BASE HARTFORD TOTAL PREMIUM EARTHQUAKE FLOATER PREMIUM Reliance Insurance Affiliated Insurance Aetna Insurance $17,440 $54,948 $872 $73,260 $16,675' $54,948 $872 $72,495 $46,079** $49,448 $872 $96,399 *Although this premium is slightly lower than Reliance, the overall Standard & Poor's Solvency Rating for Affiliated Insurance is "vulnerable," indicating financial instability. Reliance is rated as "good," which rating indicates no solvency issues. Therefore, staff recommends that the second low proposal submitted by Reliance Insurance be awarded the policy. **Aetna's base premium does include earthquake in the amount of $2.5 million. Any coverage in addition to this amount must be obtained as supplemental earthquake insurance from a separate carrier. The total property insurance premium of $73,260 is significantly higher than the previous policy year premium of 934,019. Since the Northridge earthquake, earthquake insurance, if it can even be obtained, is extremely expensive. For this reason, Aetna has elected only to carry earthquake insurance in an amount not exceeding 92.5 million for any one policy. Based on the difficulty in obtaining earthquake insurance, compounded by Aetna's refusal to provide full earthquake insurance coverage, Barney & Barney was able to obtain only one packaged quote for earthquake insurance. This package includes one quote from Pacific Insurance Company Ltd. (which is a subsidiary of ITT/Hartford Insurance) for the first 95 million of insurance, and a quote from Agricultural Insurance for the supplemental 95 million of insurance (Agricultural did not provide a quote for the first 95 million). Staff requested that Barney & Barney obtain a quote for 910 million in coverage based on the total value of all city property having been assessed at 912.4 million through Barney & Barney's comprehensive analysis. Ten million dollars, or 81% of total assessed property value, was determined to be appropriate earthquake/flood insurance coverage during the analysis. All carriers, with the exception of Pacific Insurance Company Ltd. ("Pacific"), are admitted carriers in the State of California. This means that if any of these carriers were to become insolvent, then the City would have the benefit of the California Guarantee Fund to pay all covered claims made during the policy period. Although Pacific is not "admitted", Pacific has a rating of A + XV, which classifies the company as a superior performer (A + ), and as one of the largest insurance carriers in financial size (XV). Additionally, since Pacific Insurance Company Ltd. is a subsidiary of ITT/Hartford Insurance, Pacific has the financial backing of one of the major insurance carriers in the nation. Therefore, the City's risk is minimal in using Pacific for earthquake and flood insurance. The attached proposals summarize the premium and coverage provided by Reliance, Pacific Insurance Company Ltd./Agricultural Insurance (earthquake and flood), and Hartford Steam Boiler. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon the appropriation of 926,600 from the Insurance Internal Service Fund Retained Earnings, funds in the amount of 973,260 will be available in the General Fund Property Insurance Account 300-199-999-5204. Attachments: 1. Reliance Proposal Summary 2. Earthquake Coverage to be Provided 3. Hartford Steam Boiler Proposal Summary RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY PROPOSAL SUMMARY TERM: February 26, 1996- February 26, 1997 FORMAT: Occurrence NAMED INSURED: City of Temecula BLANKET PROPERTY COVERAGE ALL LOCATION BUILDING LIMIT $9,438,000 CONTENTS LIMIT $1,160,000 DEDUCTIBLE 5,000 per occurrerIc6 OPTIONAL COVERAGE INCLUDED: COVERAGE Debris Removal Pollutant Cleanup and Removal Preservation of Property Fire Department Service Charge Newly Acquired Property Newly Acquired Personal Property Building Property Off Premises Broadened Building Architect Fees Paved Surfaces Building Owner Glass Lawns, Trees, Shrubs, and Plants Recharging Detached Outdoor Signs Incidental Locations Personal Effects Transit LIABILITY LIMIT $10,000 $10,000 Properly Limit Property Limit $1,000,000 $500,000 $10,000 Property Limit Property Limit Property Limit Property Limit Property Limit $2,000 Property. Limit $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 DEDUCTIBLE $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 N/A N/A $5,000 N/A $250 N/A N/A $100 $5,000 $100 $250 Attachment 1 Brands and Labels Water Damage Arson Reward Crime Reward Change in Temperature Valuable Papers Accounts Receivable Jewelry and Watches . Fur and Fur Garments Patterns, Dies and Molds Extra Expense Water Backup Money and Securities Media Fine Arts Breakage for Fine Arts Inventory or Appraisal Cost Loss Adjustment Ordinance or Law - Coverage A Ordinance or Law - Coverage B Ordinance or Law- Coverage C Off Premises Services (Direct Damage) Property Limit Property Limit 95,000 91,500 925,000 91,050,000 925,000 $2,500 $2,500 Property Limit Property Limit Property Limit $5,000 $25,000 925,000 Not Covered 910,000 Property Limit 9500,000 9500,000 9500,000 Not Covered 95,000 95,000 N/A N/A 9250 91,000 N/A 9100 9100 95,000 N/A $5,000 N/A 95,000 95,000 N/A N/A N/A 95,000 95,000 $5,000 N/A INLAND MARINE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY RELIANCE ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT (EDP) OCCURRENCE LIMIT: DEDUCTIBLE: COINSURANCE: VALUATION: COMPUTERS/PERIPHERAL DEVICES LIMIT: $641,600 $500 Agreed Value Replacement Cost $375,900 COVERAGE Air Conditioning Damage Discharge of Extinguishing Agents Duplicate Software Extra Expense Flood and Water Damage Incompatibility of Software Laptop and Portable Equipment New Acquired Locations Software Transfer Between Locations Transit LIMIT Property Limit $5,000 $50,000 $50,000 Not Covered $5,000 $5,000 $500,000 $175,700 $500,000 $10,000 DEDUCTIBLE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OTHER INLAND MARINE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY RELIANCE OCCURRENCE LIMIT: DEDUCTIBLE: COINSURANCE: VALUATION: $441,020 $1,000 Agreed Amount Actual Cash Value SCHEDULED EQUIPMENT: 1991 Massey Ferguson Trailer 2 Utility Trailers 1992 Flexo Arrow Trailer Speed Limit Sign' $31,500 $7,910 $5,500 $10,000 COVERAGE Borrowed Property on Any One Item Employee Tools and Clothing/Any One Employee Misc Tools and Equipment Any One Item Newly Acquired Property Rental Reimbursement Valuable Papers and Records Mobile/Communication Equipment Office Equipment Scheduled Equipment Additional Newly Acquired Equipment/Property LIMIT $1,500 $ 5,000/$1,000 $1,000 $500 $25,000 $10,000 $1,050,000 $236,510 133,600 $55,910 $15,000 DEDUCTIBLE $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $5,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE TO BE PROVIDED BY PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. AND AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE COMPANY PERILS INSURED: INTERESTS COVERED: LIMITS OF LIABILITY: DEDUCTIBLES: EXCLUSIONS: VALUATION: Earthquake and flood, and perils resulting in difference in conditions. Buildings, contents, extra expense, valuable papers, electronic data processing (EDP) hardware and software, and EDP extra expense. $10,000,000 per occurrence, with separate annual aggregate with respect to earthquake and flood. The first $5 million is provided by Pacific, and the supplemental $5 million is provided by Agricultural. 10% per unit of insurance, including time element as a unit $100,000 minimum per occurrence for earthquake $50,000 per occurrence for flood $25,000 per occurrence - all other perils Pollution, contamination, theft, asbestos Replacement cost, except actual loss sustained on extra expense. Attachment 2 HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSURANCE PROPOSAL SUMMARY BOILER & MACHINERY COVERAGE OBJECTS COVERED: Pressure and Refrigeration Objects Mechanical Objects Electrical Objects Comprehensive Excluding Production Machinery COVERAGE Direct Damage Expediting Expense LIMIT $3,500,000 $5,000 DEDUCTIBLE $1,000 $1,000 Attachment 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTOR~EPYPROV/~3/'~ DIRECTOR OF F A ~ CITY MANAGE;:k~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager PI nn Gary Thornhill, Director. of a ing,~'7' February 13, 1996 Direction on Pending Council Request Prepared By: David W. Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council direct staff to discontinue development of a tree ordinance. BACKGROUND In recent months, the Council has expressed concern that the City may not be able to limit the removal of mature trees in conjunction with a development project. As a result, the Council directed Staff to investigate the need for a tree preservation ordinance to protect mature and significant trees in the community. DISCUSSION Based upon the Council's direction, staff reviewed the two different approaches used to protect mature and locally significant trees. The two primary approaches used to protect local trees 8r6: 1. The adoption of a specific preservation and protection ordinance; and, 2. The use of the General Plan and development review process. In most circumstances, the development review process can protect mature trees in the community. The only limitation in using the development review process to protect mature and significant trees is that it does not prevent a property owner from independently removing or topping (excessively trimming) a tree independent of a development project. If the Council wishes to provide additional protection for mature and significant trees outside of the development review process, then adoption of a specific ordinance would probably be necessary. CONCLUSION Based upon our evaluation of the issue, it is staff's opinion that the current development review process is capable of adequately protecting local trees. As a result, staff recommends that the Council direct staff to not prepare a Citywide tree ordinance. R:~HOGAND\TREEORD1.CC 1/29/96 dwh ITEM 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: · APPROVAL CITY ATTORN~~ DIR. OF FIN CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance February 13, 1996 Out-of-State Travel RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize certain out-of-state travel plans. DISCUSSION: The City's travel policy requires council authorization for all out-of-state travel. Approval for the following out-of-state travel is requested as outlined below: EST. ATTENDEE LOCATION PURPOSE DATE COST Det. Paul Brinkman & Det. Mark Cordova Reno, Nevada 24th Annual Robbery February 1996 $570 Investigators Association Training Seminar Ron Roberrs Washington, D.C. National League of Cities March 1996 $2,000 Annual Congressional Conference The 24th Annual Robbery Investigator's Association Training Seminar being held in Reno, NV is the only seminar directed solely to police investigators in the robbery division. This request includes training, hotel and airfare for two detectivej. The training will provide a valuable opportunity for investigators to communicate and gain insight from other detectives in this specialty area. The Annual Congressional Conference is an enrichment conference with sessions addressing Policy Committee meetings, steering committes, legislative workshops, state municipal league briefings and meetings with congressional delegates. The City of Temecula has sent delegates in the past and it proved to be beneficial and provided valuable information to conference attendees. R:tNORTONLtAGENDASIOSTRDC. AGN 01/12/96 FISCAL IMPACT: The funds for the National League of Cities Annual Congressional Conf. will be charged to account number 001-100-999-5258. The Robbery Investigators Training Seminar will be charged to account number 001-170-999-5261. R:INORTONLtAGENDASIOSTRDC, AGN 01/12/96 ITEM 9 APPROVAL CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council City Manager ~---~r/ February 13, 1996 Resolution Finding Benefit to the Community from the Statewide School Facilities General Obligation Bond RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY FROM THE STATEWIDE SCHOOL FACILITIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND BACKGROUND: On February 1, 1996 Mayor Lindemans and I met with Barbara Tooker and Dr. Patricia Novotney of the Temecula Valley Unified School District to discuss school financing in the State of California. Ms. Tooker requested that the City join the School District in a statement of support for a Statewide School Facilities General Obligation Bond. Such a proposal, now known as Proposition 203, will appear on the March 26, 1966 ballot. Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY FROM THE STATEWIDE SCHOOL FACILITIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND WHEREAS, California's school population is growing by an average of 160,000 students each year creating a need for more classrooms so that students will have an opportunity to learn in an educationally appropriate environment; and Wt!F~RE&S, Statewide School Facility Bond Measure Proposition 203 will provide $3 billion in State funds for Kindergarten through University; and WHEREAS, The City of Temecula has gone from a population of 27,000 in 1990 to its current population of 41,000, approximately 955 average rate of increase per year, during this 5 year City period; and WHEREAS, The Temecula Valley Unified School District enrollment has gone from 1,200 students in 1985/86 to 12,500 students in 1995/96, exceeding 10% average rate of increase per year, during this 10 year District period; and WIW~REAS, The City of Temecula and County of Riverside have approved General Plans containing quantifies of new residential units which will bring more than 20,000 new students to the district, creating the need for more than 20 new Temecula Valley Unified School District schools over the next 10-20 years; and WHEREAS, Temecula Valley Unified School District .will not receive any more State funds for school construction unless future Bond measures such as Proposition 203 are passed by State voters; and WHEREAS, the lack of adequate school facilities hurts the quality of education in our communities; and WHEREAS, building needed schools will create as many as 50,000 jobs statewide for every 120 schools built in the State; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula that the Statewide School Facility Bond Measure Proposition 203 which is on the March 26, 1996 ballot will provide substantial benefits which are necessary for this community. Re,off95 I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 3 day of February, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, hne S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 96-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __th day of February, 1996, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: CO~CILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMF~MBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Resos\95 2 ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: FINANCE DIRECT~a~'~ CITY MANAGER ~ ~, CITY OF TEMECL LA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Enginee[ February 13, 1996 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument bonds in Tract No. 20703-1. (Easterly of intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road) PREPARED BY:/~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer /~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation bonds in Tract No. 20703-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer, and surety. BACKGROUND: On December 22, 1987, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: DAV-BAR I, a California Partnership c/o Coscan Davidson Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The American Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 713 1951 in the amount of $446,000to cover street improvements. 2. BondNo. 7131952 in the amount of $121,500to cover water system improvements. 3. Bond No. 713 1953 in the amount of $80,500 to cover sewer system improvements. 4. BondsNo. 7131951, 7131952, and 7131953 in the amount of $223,000, $60,750, and $40,250, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. 5. Bond No. 713 1954 in the amount of $10,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. n\agdrpt\96\0213\tr207031 .fnl On August 27, 1991, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one- year warranty period, and authorized the reduction in Faithful Performance bond amounts for warranty purposes to the following amounts: Street Improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: $44,600 12,150 8,050 Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. The subdivision Monumentation was also inspected and verified. Therefore Staff recommends the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty bonds and the following Subdivision Monumentation bond: Subdivision Monumentation: Bond No. 713 1954 $10,000 The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The contractual claim period having run and no claims have been filed with the City, therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material bonds be released: Street Improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: Bond No. 173 1951 Bond No. 173 1952 Bond No. 173 1953 $223,000 60,750 40,250 The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 96- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are June Court, Canary Circle, Linnitt Circle, Terrill Court, Warbler Circle, and portions of Jon Christian Place, Nicolas Road, and Roripaugh Road. Nicolas Road was previously accepted into the County Maintained- Road System and became part of the City Maintained-Street System upon incorporation. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr207031 .fnl rE N ICOLAS r~.~. ~' ~v~ '% _. 'ROAD I L/:"i '.": ;:.'..". ~,~N . J" ~ CNnlS+i~N5 ;~eol.~ ~ VICINITY MAP TRACT NO. 20703-1 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: FINANCE DIRECT '~-- CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECL LA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Enginee[. February 13, 1996 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2 (Easterly of intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road) PREPARED BY://///' Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer ' Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2, AUTHORIZE the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, ACCEPT the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders, APPROVE the subdivision agreement rider, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. BACKGROUND: On June 14, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Barratt American Incorporated, c/o Coscan Davidson Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation in Tract No. 20703-2. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The American Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 11126948501 in the amount of $623,500to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. 11126948519 in the amount of $168,000 to cover water system improvements. Bond No. 11126948527 in the amount of $166,000 to cover sewer system improvements. Bonds No. 11126948501, 11126948519, and 11126948527 in the amount of $311,750, $84,400, and $83,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr20?O32.acc 5. Bond No. 11126948535 in the amount of ,27,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans: 1. Street, and sewer and water improvements within Tract No. 20703-2. 2. Subdivision Monumentation. Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements including the subdivision monumentation. The Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts have accepted their items of work. The Public Works Department therefore recommends acceptance of the work, reduction in bond amounts to the I O-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one- year warranty period. Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows: Street Improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: ,561,150 ,151,200 ,149,400 and to release the following bond: Subdivision Monumentation: Bond No. 1112694835 ,27,000 The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds changing the obligee' from the County of Riverside to the City of Temecula and reducing the bonds for warranty purposes in the following amounts: Streets and Drainage improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: Bond No. 11126948501 Bond No. 11126948519 Bond No. 11126948527 ,62,350 ,16,800 ,16,600 The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 96- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are Jimson Circle, Aralia Court, Lark Court, Mimulus Way, Sanderling Way, and portions of Winchester Road, Swallow Court, Starling Street, Senna Court, and Roripaugh Road. Winchester Road is already included in the State Highway Maintenance System. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Riders to Public Improvement Bonds (on file) Subdivision Agreement Rider(on file) r: \agdrpt%96~0213\tr207032. acc .VICINITY MAP TRACT NO. 20703-2 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ' CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Release the Public Improvement Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22786. (Southwesterly of intersection of Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road) PREPARED BY: ,////Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer ,~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of the Subdivision Monumentation, Faithful Performance Warranty, and Labor and Material Bonds, in Tract No 22786, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Surety, and Developer. BACKGROUND: On July 25, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract Map No. 22786, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Barratt American Incorporated c/o Coscan Davidson 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets, installation of water and sewer systems, and subdivision monumentation. Bonds were posted for these items by The American Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 11141296654in the amount of $244,500 to cover street improvements 2. Bond No. 11141296662in the amount $34,500to cover water system improvements. 3. Bond No. 11141296670 in the amount of $42,000 to cover sewer system improvements. 4. Bonds No. 11141296654, 11141296662, and 11141296670 in the amounts of $122,500, $17,250, and $21,000 respectively to cover labor and material. -1- r:\agdrpt\96\O213\tr22786f. inl 5. Bond No. 11141296688 in the amount of $11,500to cover subdivision monumentation. By City Council action on August 27, 1991, the improvements for this project were accepted, the warranty period initiated, and Faithful Performance Warranty bonds were submitted in the following amounts: Street Improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: Bond No. 11141296654 Bond No. 11141296662 Bond No. 11141296670 $24,450 3,450 4,200 Public Works Staff has reviewed the project including the subdivision monumentation, and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds and the following Subdivision Monumentation Bond: Subdivision Monumentation: Bond No. 11141296688 $11,500 Labor and Material Bonds are posted-to assure payment to material and labor suppliers. The lien period following City Council project acceptance has expired with no claims having been filed. Therefore the Public Works Department also recommends the release of the Labor and Material bonds as follows: Street Improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: Bond No. 11141296654 Bond No. 11141296662 Bond No. 11141296670 $122,500 $17,250 $21,000 The affected streets are Tanager Circle, and portions of Jon Christian Place, Nicolas Road, and North General Kearny Road. Nicolas Road was a County Maintained Road prior to incorporation and became a part of the City maintained-Street System by succession. The other streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution 96- at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map -2- r:\agdrpt\96\O213\tr22786Linl (..¢da 's.t ~'s.'d" ,LOT I0 / / / project Site ,,~ ~ .,~,~ PROJHCT C,ALIFOIvNIA . 4l \ VICINITY NAP TRACT NO. 22786 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL RY~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC 0 CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer : February 13, 1996 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 23126. (Southerly of Intersection of Nicolas Road at Roripaugh Road) PREPARED BY://'~,- Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer ~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 23126, AUTHORIZE the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumentat, on Bond, ACCEPT the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders, APPROVE the subdivision agreement rider, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. BACKGROUND: On November 7, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Barratt American Incorporated, c/o Coscan Davidson Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentat,on. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The American Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 11127029103in the amount of $111,500 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. 11127029111 in the amount of $22,000 to cover water system improvements. 3. Bond No. 11127029129 in the amount of $24,000 to cover sewer system improvements. Bonds No. 11127029103, 11127029111, and 11127029129 in the amount of $55,750, ~11,000, and ~12,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr23126a.cep 5. Bond No. 11127029137in the amount of $9,800to cover subdivision monumentation. The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans: 1. Street, drainage, sewer and water improvements within Tract No. 23126. 2. Subdivision Monumentation. Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements including the subdivision monumentation. The Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts have accepted their items of work. The Public Works Department therefore recommends release of the monumentation bond, acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in bond amounts to the 1 O-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows; Street Improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: 100,350 $19,800 $21,600 and to release the following bond: Subdivision Monumentation: Bond No. 11126948741 $9,800 The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds changing the obligee' from the County of Riverside to the City of Temecula and reducing the bonds for warranty purposes in the following amounts: Streets and Drainage improvements: Sewer System Improvements: Water System Improvements: Bond No. 11127029103 Bond No. 11127029111 Bond No. 11127029129 $11,150 $ 2,200 $ 2,400 The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The affected street is being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 96- at this time. The street within the subdivision to be accepted is Sweet Brier Circle. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Riders to Public Improvement Bonds (on file) Subdivision Agreement Rider (on file) r:~agdrpt\96\0213\tr23126a.cep 0AO v /3 xe, / ~ ,.,\ L ~ ,,,~,~ PROJECT VZCZNZ TY klAP TRACT NO. 23126 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: :APPROVAL ' CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager J.oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tracts No. 19939-1,-2, and -F) (Northwesterly of intersection of Pala Road at Via Eduardo) PREPARED BY'./~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer 7~- Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 19939-1,-2, AND -F) BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved TraCt Maps No. 19939-1 and 19939-2 on June 16, 1987 and approved Tract Map No. 19939-F on July 21, 1987, and entered into subdivision agreements with Joshua-Towne Homes for street, water and sewer improvements. On March 12, 1990, April 15, 1991, and April 15, 1991, respectively, the County of Riverside accepted the improvements, reduced the faithful performance bonds for warranty purposes, and initiated the warranty period. The City Council released the Subdivision Monumentation bonds for all three tracts on July 23, 1991, and the Labor and Material and Faithful Performance Warranty securities for all three tracts on April 28, 1992. The public streets recommended for acceptance are as follows: Tract No. 19939-1: Hiawatha Court, Bocaw Circle, Saho Court, Eona Circle, Pashaho Street, Kimo Street, and portions of Huron Street, Piute Street, Lahontan Street, Shaba Circle, and Via Gilberto. Tract No. 19939-2: Parsippany Court, Arabasca Circle, Bandan Court, Jeronimo Street, Hopactong Street, Pahuta Street, and portions of Via Eduardo, Piute Street, Lahontan Street, Huron Street, Washana Court, and Alehzon Circle. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst Tract No. 19939-F: Portions of Via Eduardo, Washana Court, Alehzon Circle, Lahontan Street, Shaba Circle, and Via Gilberto. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. Attachments: Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 19939-1,-2, AND F) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots for public road and public utility purposes made by Joshua-Towne Homes, a California Corporation, with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 19939-1, -2, and -F; and, WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted the improvements as complete within Tracts No. 19939-1 on March 12, 1990, and Tracts No. 19939-2 and 19939-F on April 15, 1991. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated on Tract Maps No. 19939-1,-2, and -F, and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained-Street System as described below: 1. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "L" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 19939-1, filed 17 June 1987, in Book 170 of Maps, Pgs 1-4 Incl., further described as follows: Lot "A" Portion of Huron Street Lots "B" & "K" Portions of Piute Street Lot "C" Hiawatha Court Lot "D" Bocaw Circle Lot "E" Portion of Lahontan Street Lot "F" Pashaho Street Lot "G" Saho Court Lot "H" Portion of Via Gilberto Lot "1" Eona Circle Lot "J" Kimo Street Lot "L" Portion of Shaba Circle 2. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "M" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 19939-2, filed 17 June 1987, in Book 170 of Maps, Pgs 5-9 Incl., further described as follows: Lot "A" Lot "B" Lots "C" & "K" Lot "D" Lot "E" Lot "F" Lot "G" Lot "H" Lot "I" Lot "J" Lot "L" Lot "M" Portion of Via Eduardo Parsippany Court Pahuta Street Jeronimo Street Hopactong Street Portion of Lahontan Street Portion of Huron Street Arabasca Circle Bandan Court Portion of Piute Street Portion of Washana Court Portion of Alehzon Circle 3. Those lots described as-Lots "A" through "F" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 19939-Fo filed 7 August 1987, in Book 171, Pgs 92-97 Incl., further described as follows: Lot "A" Lot "B" Lot "C" Lot "D" Lot "E" Lot "F" Portion of Via Eduardo Portion of Washana Court Portion of Alehzon Circle Portion of Lahontan Street Portion of Shaba Circle Portion of Via Gilberto r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: pAI, A~UI ~O PI1 N 4"r'44'·e'W """' 10·1.1·' (1 lleJo'} 1~. PSLA - ~ U;n'a/ /f~ /1~ / //~ I ~, as · IIL I ~ I 2. 2s 1s f~ · 22 ~ S k \ 3 3e I 83 82 67 el 66 02 64 63 ~ 10 1 32 35 e 1~ 31 36 ~ ~ 8 15 30 ~ d 7 16 29 38 ,7283. 5 21 40 ~ 10 26 4 / 3 20 25 42 2 21 24 43 ~ I 22 32e'2 112 114 118 47 -- 102 101 100 19 120 121 P ~ lilt,IT ! 2 O 12 '~ 23 3 , e 13 4 I 14 24 88 66 86 66 85 63 10 ----"----- 84 67 -- 82 11 83 88 el 82 13 751 77 1 89~ 88 122 130 131 132' 54 66 66 51 VIA i63 644 71 72 73 74 68 el 60 60 86 t LOT 87 FOR LOT 87 O~TAIJ · ODEI8A lOAD lOT O 1' IAR . ·TRIP LEGEND STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACCEPTED INTO CITY MAINTA/NED-STREET SYSTEM NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP ITEM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager i~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No. 20703-2, and 23126). (Southeasterly of intersection of Winchester Road at Roripaugh Road) PREPARED BY://~' Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-2 AND 23126) BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract Map No. 20703-2 on June 14, 1988, and Tract Map No. 23126 on November 7, 1989, and entered into subdivision improvement agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, and sewer and water systems on those respective dates. On February 13, 1996, the City Council accepted the improvements and initiated the warranty period for both Tracts. These two projects were constructed by DAV-BAR I, a California General Partnership, (as to Tract No. 20703-2)and DAV-BAR II, a California General Partnership (as to Tract No. 23126) (Both General Partnerships comprised of Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, and Davidson Pacific Ltd., a California Limited Partnership). The affected public streets for these projects are respectively: Tract No 20703-2: Jimson Circle, Lark Court, Mimulus Way, Aralia Court, Sanderling Way, and portions of Roripaugh Road, Winchester Road, Starling Street, Swallow Court, and Senna Court. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032 Tract No. 23126: Sweet Brier Circle Winchester Road is in the State Highway System. The rest of the affected public streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System under Resolution No. 96- FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALWO~, ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-1, AND ~786) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots for public road and public utility purposes made by with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 20703- 1, and 22786; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within both Tracts No. 20703-1 and 22786 as complete on August 27, 1991. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 'City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATYEST: June S. Oreek City Clerk [SEAL] r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify. that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following vote: . · AYES: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated on Tracts No. 20703-2, and 23126; and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained- Street System as described below: A. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "J" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 20703-2, ~ed 23 December, 1987, in Book 185 of Maps, Pgs 37-44 Ind., further described as follows: Lot "A"# Lot "B" Lot "C" Lot "D" Lot "E" Lot "F" Lot "G" Lot "H" Lot "I" Lot "J" Portion of Winchester Road Portion of Roripaugh Road Portion of Starling Street Jimson Circle Mimulus Way Lark Court Aralia Court Sanderling Way Portion of Swallow Court Portion of Senna Court B. That lot described as Lot "A", as shown on Tract Map No. 23126, f'ded 8 November, 1989, in Book 209 of Maps, Pgs 60-62, Incl., further described as follows: Lot "A" Sweet Brier Circle # Street is within State Maintained-Highway System. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO T. HE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: RA.t~C ~o VICINITY MAP LEGEND STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACC]~PT~D IN'TO CITY MA1NTA/NED-STR~ET SYSTEM NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL Rf~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tracts No. 20703-1 and 22786). (Southwesterly of the intersection of Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road) PREPARED BY://ll/Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer /~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-1 AND 22786) BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 20703-1 on December 22, 1987, and Tract No. 22786 on July 25, 1989, and entered into Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, water and sewer improvements with DAV-BAR I, a California Partnership. The City Council accepted the public improvements for these two tracts on August 27, 1991, and initiated the warranty period, and reduced Faithful Performance bond amounts to the 10 % warranty level. The City Council released the Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Subdivision Monumentation bonds on February 13, 1996. The affected streets for these projects are respectively: Tract No. 20703-1: June Court, Canary Circle, Linnitt Circle, Terrill Court, Warbler Circle, and portions of Jon Christian Place, Nicolas Road, and Roripaugh Road. Tract No. 22786: Tanager Circle, and portions of Nicolas Road, Jon Christian Place, and North General Kearny Road. Nicolas Road is already in the City Maintained-System by succession to the County of Riverside. r:\agd rpt\96\0213\tr227867.031 FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. Attachments: Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. r:~agdrpt\96\0213\tr227867.031 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CAL~O~, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-1 AND 22786) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted offer of dedication of certain lots for public road and public utility purposes made by DAV-BAR I, a California Partnership, with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 20703-1 and 22786; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tracts No. 20703- and 22786 on August 27, 1991. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTEr}, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996. ATTEST: Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr227867.031 [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, dO hereby certify 'that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr227867.031 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated on Tract Maps No. 20703-1 and 22786, and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained- Street System as described below: A. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "H" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 20703-1, fried 23 December 1987, in Book 177 of Maps, Pgs 72-76 Ind., further described as follows: Lot "A"* Lot "B" Lot "C" Lot "D" Lot "E" Lot "F" Lot "G" Lot "H" Portion of Nicolas Road Portion of Roripaugh Road Portion of Jon Christian Place June Court Canary Circle Linnitt Circle Terrill Court Warbler Circle B. Those lots described as Lot "A" through "D" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 22786, f'ded 28 July 1989, in Book 205 of Maps, Pgs 10-13 Ind., further described as follows: Lot "A"* Lot "B" Lot "C" Lot "D" Portion of Nicolas Road Portion of North General Kearny Road Portion of Jon Christian Place Tanager Circle *Accepted by the County of Riverside into the County Maintained-Road System prior to City incorporation on December 1, 1989, at which time it became a City Maintained Street by succession. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr227867.031 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-__ SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: NICOI, AS ROAD k t,- k. / / VICINITY MAP LEGEND STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACCEPTED INTO CITY MLINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 17 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ' CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager )~,C, Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No. 22208. (Northeasterly of Margarita Road at Solana Way) PREPARED BY://",e-Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer i~F~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 22208) BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 22208 on February 23, 1988, and entered into subdivision agreements with Rancho Solana Associates, a California General Partnership, for street, water and sewer improvements. On June 18, 1990, the County of Riverside accepted the improvements, reduced the faithful performance bonds for warranty purposes, and initiated the warranty period. The City Council released the Subdivision Monumentation, and the Labor and Material and Faithful Performance Warranty bonds on April 28, 1992. The public streets recommended for acceptance are Amwood Way, Shorewood Court, Nightcrest Circle, Waynewood Drive, Deepwood Circle, and Marwood Circle. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. Attachments: Resolution No..96- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr22208c.mss RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 22208) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots for public road and public utility purposes made by Rancho Solana Associates, a California General Partnership, with'the recordation of Tract Map No. 22208; and, WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted the improvements within Tract No. 22208 as complete on June 18, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr22208c.mss STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr22208c.mss EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated on Tract Map No. 22208, and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained-Street System as described below: Those lots described as Lots "A" through "F" inclusive, as shown on Tract Map No. 22208, filed 25 February 1988, in Book 180 of Maps, Pgs 93-98 Incl., further described as follows: Lot "A" Lot "B" Lot "C" Lot "D" Lot "E" Lot "F" Amwood Way Shorewood Court Nightcrest Circle Waynewood Drive Deepwood Circle Marwood Circle r:\agdrpti96\0213\tr22208c.mss EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: I STREETS OR K)RTION$ OF; TO RE ACCE,lc~"ED ~ Cr'PC MAg,~A,IHED-b"t"RE,w~ S'YS'Z'E~ 3R I8 ax a~ #~ a4 / ! NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCAT-F- .~ ,3e WC/N/TY MAP ~ ITEM 18 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: DATE: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 SUBJECT: Award a Contract to Remove and Replace. Concrete and A.C. on Commerce Center Drive, Public Works Maintenance - Project No. PW95-96-17 PREPARED BY: 1~1~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award a contract to Maples and Associates to remove and replace concrete and A.C. on Commerce Center Drive, 200 feet south of Enterprise Circle West at the channel. BACKGROUND: In January, 1996 the Public Works Department, in conformance with the City's current purchasing procedures requested proposals for a Public Works Maintenance Project No. PW95- 96-17. Eight (8) sealed bids were received for the following scope of work: Remove and replace 530 Sq. Ft. of concrete, 215 L.Ft. of curb and gutter, install 1,770 Sq. Ft. of sidewalk, and 1,096 Sq. Ft. of A.C. on Commerce Center Drive, 200 feet south of Enterprise Circle West at the channel. The bids r~ceived is as follows: Maples & Associates KLM Engineering Rancho Concrete, Inc. Monteleone's Excavating, Murrieta NPG Corporation AMERC, Inc. Farwest Concrete Const. Allied Grading & Paving, Inc. $13,853.15 $14,214.08 $14,587.00 $16,500.00 $17,041.00 $18,454.00 $18,692.50 $24,412.00 Maples and Associates has performed contract work in the past for the City of Temecula, and we have found their work to be satisfactory. The costs are within the Engineer's estimate. r:~agdtpt\96\0213 \channel .bid/nip FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Routine Street Maintenance, Account No. 100-164-601-5402for the proposed work on Commerce Center Drive. Attachments: Contract r:~agdrpt\96\02 13\channd.bid/ajp CITY OF TEMECULA WORK ORDER//95-96-17 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 13th day of February. 1996, by and between the City of Temecula ("City") a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, and Maples and Associates hereinafter called "Contractor". In consideration of their mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City hereinafter set forth, hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary to perform and complete in a workmanlike manner, all of the work required for the construction of the improvements described in Work Order No.95-96-17 attached hereto. The work shall be performed according to the City of Temecula's Procedures For Informal Bidding For Public Works Street Maintenance Work Orders of $25.000 or Less. Fiscal Year 1995-96. ("Informal Bidding Procedures"). Where the Work Order or the Informal Bidding Procedures describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, the latest version of the City of Temecula. Department of Public Works Standards Drawings for Public Works Construction ("Standard Drawings"), and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") shall control. Copies of the Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 In case of any conflict between the Standard Drawings and the Standard Specifications, the Standard Drawings shall control. Where the Work Order, the Informal Bidding Procedures, the Standard Drawings, or the Standard Specifications only describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. 2. The City, in consideration of the performance of this Contract, agrees to pay the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept in full satisfaction for the work done hereunder the sum of Thirteen Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Three dollars and Fifteen Cents ($13.853.15), in accordance with the bid of the Contractor which sum shall be paid to the Contractor within the time and in the manner set forth in the Informal Bidding Procedures, final payment to be made within thirty-five (35) days after filing Notice of Completion of said work and improvement with the Riverside County Recorder. 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. r: ~naint\96workor\95-96-17. oon/ajp These rates are on file in the office of the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at'cost at the City Clerk's office in Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.15, 1777.6, and 1813 of the labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 4. Contractor, by executing the Contract, 'hereby certifies: "I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract." 5. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site, shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Principal, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City. 6. Contractor and subcontractors shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to City business license. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by the [Mayor/City Manager] and attested to by the City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Contractor has hereunto subscribed this Contract the day, month and year hereinabove written. By: Name: Title: Maples and Associates 41419 Pear Street, #4 Murrieta, California 92562 r: knminfi96wo~ofi95-96-- 17. con/njp CITY OF TEMECULA Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk (Date) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney r: ~,maint\96workor\95-96-17. con/nip PROJECT NO. 95-96-17 CITY OF TEMECULA CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE This is to certify that , (hereinafier the "undersigned") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by any of the undersigned's agents, employees, or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the building, erection, construction or repair of that certain work improvement known as: , situated in the Community of , The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid sums owning to the undersigned. Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and in favor of the undersigned and the City of Temecula or which relate in any way to work performed by the undersigned with regard to the above referenced construction project. Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of and waives the benefits of 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known to him must have materially effected settlement with the debtor". This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims which the undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents and employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction or the above referenced project or the contract between the City and the Contractor with respect thereto whether such claims are now known or unknown or are suspected or unsuspected. Dated: By: (Name) (Title) r: ~int\96workofi95- 96-17. con/ajp ITEM 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager t:-Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Second Amendment to Employment Systems, Inc. Agreement to Provide Inspection Services for the Winchester Interchange Project No. PW94-21 PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to Employment Systems, Inc. Agreement to provide Inspector Services for the Winchester Interchange Project No. PW94-21. BACKGROUND: The City entered into an agreement with Employment Systems, Inc. (ESI) on April 14, 1994 to provide supplemental building inspection services. Services are provided when temporally vacated positions, during vacations and to supplement staff during peak work loads. The Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15 Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements project will require inspection by the City as identified in the Construction Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans. We have selected an inspector with specific knowledge of this type of inspection work who which will include construction review of the installation of the piles, construction of the bridge supports and the structural components of the bridge. Mike Nichols has been selected to perform the inspection services. Mr. Nichols has inspected similar Caltrans projects and is familiar with Caltrans construction methods and procedures. Mr. Nichols has also been a resident of Temecula for the past five (5) years. The second amendment has been reviewed as to form by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for inspection services have been allocated in the Capital Improvement Program for this project. Inspection services will be paid for at the hourly rate set forth in Exhibit "A" of the amendment. ATTACHMENTS: Second Amendment to Employment Systems, Inc. -1- r.~agdrpt\96\O213\pw94-21.ins/ajp SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE STAFFING SERVICES TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE STAFFING SERVICES TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA (HEREINAFrER "SECOND AMENDMENT") is made and effective as of February 13, 1996 by and between the City of Temecula ("Agency") and Employment System, Inc. ("ESI"). In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and warranties set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Second Amendment is made with respect to the following facts which the parties agree are true and correct: A. On April 14, 1994, the Agency and ESI entered into that certain agreement entitled "Employment Systems, Inc. Agreement to Provide Staffing Services to the City of Temecula" ("Agreement"). B. The parties now desire to extend the term of the Agreement until February 13, 1997, substitute certain employees and add new employees to the Agreement, and make certain other changes in the Agreement. 2. Paragraph 2.2 of the Agreement is hereby mended to read as follows: "2.2 Term of Agreement. This Agreement and the rights and obligations of AGENCY and ESI shall commence on the effective time and date specified in paragraph 2.1 and shall expire and terminate at the same time on February 13, 1997. The term of this Agreement may be extended only by an agreement in writing, signed and executed by the parties hereto prior to such expiration. It is specifically understood and agreed that AGENCY may not hold-over upon such expiration and may not be or become lessee of the employees from term to term." 3. Article 5, Indemnification, of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "ESI" shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless AGENCY for the purposes of all required payroll deductions and withholdings, legally required workers' compensation insurance, and health benefits of the employees. However, inasmuch as the employees will discharge governmental responsibilities and perform in accordance with the ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, and procedures adopted by AGENCY in its governmental capacity (1) ESI and its employees shall be entitled to all protection and immunities of government employees, including without limitation, those provided in California Government Code, Title I, Division 3.6, Claims and Actions Against Public Entities and Public Employees; and (2) AGENCY does release and agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the employees, ESI, and ESI's agents, personnel, directors, and officers from any and all actions, claims, damages or injuries to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities arising out of or related to the services performed under this Agreement." 4. Exhibit A, Staff, to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit A, Staff, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is added to the Agreement. r: \cip\projecta\pw 94\pow94-21 \impcot2. ag dajp 5. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written. EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. CITY OF TEMECULA President Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk · Approved'As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney rAcip\projects\pw94\pow94-21~nspect2.sgr/ajp Exhibit Employee(s) included in this Agreement by and between the City of TEMECULA and EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS, INC., (is/are) listed below: Employee 1: Mike Nichols (under the supervising direction of Don Sl~ai~nolo) Total ESI payroll to Employee 1: $ 24.00 per hour Overtime will be paid at a rate of time and one-half the pay rate ( $36.00 per ho-r ) for any hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours per week. Hourly Billing Rate to TEMECULA for Employee 1: $ 29.70 per hour * The billing rate for Employee I is based on all hours paid to this employee. Overtime will be billed at a rate of time and one-half the billing rate ( $ 44.55 per hoHr ) for any hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours per week. The benefits provided to this employee are: Insurance: Medical/Dental/AD&D/Life/Long Term Disability Number of Vacation days: ~ Number of Sick days: ~ Number of Holidays: 17 days New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, Columbus Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, Day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day. It is understood that (this/these) employee(s) will be driving a dty vehicle for any field assignments. If the employee(s) use(s) a personal car on such assignments, billing to the City of TEMECULA will be at the rate of $ .36/mile. 6 ITEM 20 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL Ry CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC O CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Sewer Facilities Agreement with Eastern Municipal Water District for Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW94-21 PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents. Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering, inspection and testing fees in the amount of $3,940.00. BACKGROUND: During the design phase of the project, the City received a sewer facilities agreement for the sewer line relocation for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW94-21 from Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). This sewer facilities agreement sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the relocation of the sewer which is included in the project· Approximately 170 linear feet of the existing 15" V.C.P. sewer main and 850 linear feet of existing 8" V.C.P. which are located within existing easements, will be abandoned· The contractor will construct approximately 850 linear feet of new line in the new location which is about 100 feet east of the new loop on-ramp in an easement on a portion of the Mervyn's and Palm Plaza parking area· The agreement includes the description of the work to be performed, the City's responsibilities and EMWD's responsibilities during construction. The City's contractor will construct the new line within the easement acquired by the City. The City will also convey the new sewer line facilities to the District through a Bill of Sale (see Exhibit "C"). The District will inspect the new facility, accept ownership of the line, and provide future maintenance. The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. · -1- r:~gdrpt~96\O213\pw94-21.agr/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) has allocated funds for this project. through RDA Account No. 280-199-602-5804 for the required $3,940. ATTACHMENTS: Sewer Facilities Agreement and Bill of Sale Funds are available -2- r.~d~i~t\96\0213~94-21 .qdmjp INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA RELATIVE TO RELOCATION OF SEWER MAIN AT 1-15 & WINCHESTER ROAD This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 19 , by and between EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, a public agency organized and existing pursuant to Division 20 of the California Water Code (hereinafter "District") and the CITY OF TEMECULA, an incorporated municipality (hereinafter "City"). WHEREAS, City, in anticipation of expected urbanization of the area, is planning to expand the highway interchange located at Winchester Road and 1-15; and WHEREAS, in order to proceed with the highway interchange expansion project, City must remove and/or abandon two existing District sewer mains and relocate the sewer service to a new locale, all as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement and its attached exhibits is to set forth the terms and conditions associated with the required abandonment and/or relocation of District's facilities (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Project"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recited premises, together with the mutual covenants herein contained and attached hereto, it is mutually agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Remove or abandon in place approximately 850 LF of existing 15" VCP sewer mainpipeline as shown on attached Exhibit A. Remove or abandon in place approximately 170 LF of 8" VCP sewer main pipeline as shown on attached Exhibit A. Install approximately 820 LF of 15" VCP sewer main pipeline to~replace abandoned 15" sewer pipeline. D. Install six (6) 48" diameter standard manholes. 2. FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION City shall finance the entire cost of the Subject Project including all applicable permits and environmental assessment Page 1 costs, as such project is generally shown on said Exhibit A, the preliminary estimate of cost of which is $116,610.00, as developed and shown on the cost estimate attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as Exhibit B. 3. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES PLANNING, DESIGNING ANDPREPARATION OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT City shall, at its expense, with its staff and/or, by employing a properly qualified professional engineering firm, plan, design and prepare detailed construction plans and specifications for the Subject Project covered by this Agreement. B. FURNISHING AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBJECT PROJECT Following receipt of District approval of the design and detailed construction plans and specifications for the Subject Project, City shall: 1) 2) Unless otherwise approved by District in writing, request and receive at least four (4) bids from qualified and properly licensed contractors for the Subject Project. With the written concurrence of District, employ the qualified and properly licensed contractor with the lowest bid to construct the Subject ProjeCt in accord with District approved plans and specifications. City shall directly pay all costs associated with such furnishing and construction of the Subject Project. All facilities furnished, constructed and installed by City's contractor shall be installed in strict compliance with plans and specifications. Any and all deviations from such approved plans and/or specifications must be approved by District in writing prior to being made. C. INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION City hereby appoints District to inspect the furnishing and installation of all of the Subject Project and the performance of the involved work associated therewith to be performed by City's contractor for compliance with the approved detailed construction plans and specifications. It is specifically understood that District's inspection personnel shall have 'the authority to enforce such District approved detailed construction plans and specifications for the involved facilities, which Page 2 authority shall include the authority to require that any and all unacceptable materials, workmanship and/or installation be replaced, repaired or corrected by City's contractor without cost to District. District's inspection does not include inspection for compliance with safety requirements by City's contractor. In addition, City shall require its contractor to repair all facilities damaged by any party prior to District's final acceptance and to provide for a one-year materials and workmanship guarantee from the date of acceptance, providing that the contractor will repair, at its expense, all failures of facilities which it furnished, installed and/or constructed due to faulty materials or installation, including settlement of backfill. Said guarantee shall be secured by a Time Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $2,000.00 guaranteeing payment to District for its incurred costs of making any necessary repairs associated with Subject Project in the event City's contractor fails to cause satisfactory repair of the facilities within a specified period of time following District's notification. Notwithstanding the above, District shall have the unqualified right to immediately make any emergency repairs necessary to eliminate any threat to the public's health, safety or welfare and to ensure continuity of service at City's nonreimbursable expense. FIELD ENGINEERING SURVEYS AND COMPACTION AND MATERIALS STRENGTH TESTS ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION City, at its expense, shall provide all field engineering surveys and compaction and strength of concrete and other materials testing and reports required by City's engineer, appropriate public agency officials .and/or District inspection personnel. City shall promptly furnish results of all testing to District for its review. PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE A preconstruction conference shall be arranged for and scheduled by City. District personnel shall be invited to attend and participate in said preconstruction conference.~ At the preconstruction conference, City shall designate, in writing, those who have authority to represent City and shall immediately advise District of any changes in such authorized representation. EASEMENTS AND/OR FEE TITLE OWNERSHIP ACOUISITION Page 3 For those portions of the Subject Project which are to be constructed by City's contractor within and across private property upon which District does not already possess appropriate easements or other rights of way, City shall be responsible for, at its expense, acquiring duly executed easements and/or fee title ownership deeds to assure District's unequivocal right to own, operate, maintain, replace, repair and provide service from and through all involved portions of the subject facilities. G. CONVEYANCE OF OWNERSHIP Upon completion of the Subject Project and written acceptance thereof by District, City shall execute a Bill of Sale, which is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C, conveying title to District, which conveyance of title shall include a warranty by City that such title is free and clear of any and all encumbrances. H. PAYMENT OF DISTRICT ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION EXPENSES City shall make payments to District to cover District's engineering, inspection and testing expenses resulting from District's fulfillment of its responsibilities under this Agreement. I. HOLD HARMLESS City hereby agrees to indemnify and hold District harmless from any and all claims for damage to property or injuries to persons arising by reason. of or in any manner connected with the operations covered by this Agreement that are to be performed by other than personnel and equipment supplied directly by District. Such indemnification shall include attorneys' fees and court costs. DISTRICT'S OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES A. PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION District shall review the design and detailed construction plans and specifications prepared by City's engineer; inspect and test the facilities installed and/or abandoned by City's contractor; participate in preconstruction conference(s) and activity coordination activities; cooperate with City relative to easements, permits and/or fee title acquisitions; and all other obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement, on an actual cost basis. Page 4 _. B. MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE OWNERSHIP AND OPERATING. RESPONSIBILITIES Upon completion of the involved facilities and acceptance of ownership thereof, District shall operate, maintain and provide service from and through the facilities. City shall have no further responsibility or liability for such facilities. C. SEPARATE COST ACCOUNTING RECORDS District shall establish and maintain individual separate cost accounting records under which all its actual incurred expenses for the Subject Project will be clearly identified and set forth. Such records shall be made available to City upon request. D. HOLD HARMLESS District hereby agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all claims for damage to property or injuries to persons arising by reason of or in any manner connected with the operations covered by this Agreement that are to be performed by District personnel or equipment. Such indemnification shall include attorneys' fees and court costs. PREPARATION OF THIS AGREEMENT This Agreement shall not be construed against the Party preparing it, but shall be construed as if all Parties prepared it. PURPOSE OF CAPTIONS Captions of Paragraphs are for convenience purposes only and are not part of this Agreement. BINDING PROVISION This Agreement is binding of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the Parties hereto. SEVERABILITY & If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of law to be invalid or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Agreement and the remaining parts shall remain in full effect as though such invalid or unenforceable provision had not been a part of this Agreement· Page 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ATTEST: Mary C. White, Secretary By: John B. Brudin, General Manager Dated: CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: lw 7/18/9~ By: Dated: , Mayor Page 6 ..... BILL OF SALE For a valuable consideration. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. CITY OF TEMECULA (Seller), hereby bargains. conveys, and grants unto the Eastern Municipal Water District (District), a public agency of the State of California, the following described personal property. such conveyance to become effective upon completion of the construction/installation by Seller's Contractor(s) and acceptance bythe District of such personal property, which is more specifically described as: The Subject Sewer Facilities which are to be furnished and constructed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) as described and provided for in that certain Agreement, by and between Sponsor (Seller in this Bill of Sate) and District. dated , to which this Bill of Sale is attached as Exhibit c. Seller hereby warrants that the above-described personal property is free and clear of any and all encumbrances. In this regard Seller hereby agrees to protect and defend (District's) right to own, operate, maintain and provide services through all the personal property hereby transferred to District's ownership wherein the defense of the District's right to own, operate, maintain and provide services as provided hereinabove results from any person or entity's alleged rights to any of the personal property described hereinabove or for any monetary damages resulting from the nonpayment by Seller of any erson or entity having the right to file a li against said personal property. Seller further agrees to indemnify the District en for any and all losses which may be occasioned or suffered by the District as a result of any claims by others as to clear title of the personal property covered hereby. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the State of California Expi rati on Date (Signature) (lype name and litle) '(Signature) (lype Name and litle) (Mailing'Address) (Date) EXHIBIT C X Z Z EN-56b COST ESTIMATE OF SEWER FACILITIES Developer City of Temecula Tract W.O./C.O.# 94-285 I.D./S.A.# U-8/34 Date 5/5/95 Est'r. Initials CFW Sup'r Intials VJB Typist Initials Implementing Facilities: Yes List No X Sewer Easement: Yes X In Project X Offsite work Authorization: Yes No Sewer Backflow Valves: Required Lots: Treatment Plant Notification: Needed Not Needed A. Sewer Line Installation: 820 L.F. - 15" VCP Sewer Main None B. Installation of Manholes and Cleanouts: 6 ea. - 48" dia. std. manhole $ 61,500.00 C. Miscellaneous Installation: 850 L.F. - Remove or abandon __ exist. 15" sewer; 170 L.F. - remove or abandon exist. 8" swr. $ 12,000.00 D. T.V. 820 $ 20.400.00 Feet of Sewer Line .......... , ............. $ 410.00 SUBTOTAL $ 94.310.00 Contingencies, add to subtotal immediately preceding (10%)~$ 9.430.00 SUBTOTAL,' ........... - ........................... ,,,, ....... $103.740.00 Engineering (by Developer's Engineer) add to subtotal immediately preceding ( 9.0%},,,,, ........ ,.$ 9.340.00 EMWD Engineering, Plan Review, and Construction Inspection, add to subtotal immediately preceding ( 3.4%} ..,$ 3.530.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST - SEWER $116,610.00 AMOUNTS ARE TO BE ROUNDED OFF TO THE NEAREST $10.00 *Estimated costs to be incurred by EMWD Typed original to New Business CC: Engineering File, R/W File EXHIBIT B ITEM 21 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager .C J.oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Sewer Facilities and Service Agreement with Eastern Municipal Water District for Construction of a Sanitary Sewer in Pauba Road for the Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase I, Fire Station No. 84, Project No. PW95-09. PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Steve Charette, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the attached Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents; Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering, inspection and testing fees in the amount of $7,655.00. BACKGROUND: During the design phase of the project the City received a sewer facilities agreement for the sewer line construction for Fire Station No. 84 Improvements, Project No. PW95-09 from Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). This sewer facilities agreement sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the construction of sewer facilities for the project. The City's contractor will construct a sewer main and service lateral in Pauba Road for a distance of approximately 2,200 feet from an existing sewer main located near the Community Lutheran Church Site to the new Fire Station. The agreement includes the description of the work to be performed, the City's responsibilities and EMWD's responsibilities during construction. The City will also convey the new sewer line facilities to the District through a Bill of Sale (see Exhibit "F"). The District will inspect the new facility, accept ownership of the line, and provide future maintenance. The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney. -1- r.~aBctrpt\96\O213~pw95-O9.nfrlmnc FISCAL IMPACT: The Fire Station facility and site improvements are funded by Fire Mitigation funds budgeted in the City's Capital Improvements Program for FY 1994-1995, Account No. 210-190-626- 5804, and the improvements to Pauba Road are funded with Development Impact Fees, Account No. 210-165-660-5804. ATTACHMENTS: Sewer Facilities Agreement and Bill of Sale -2- r: ~agdrpt\96\O213 \pw95-Og.agr/smc STANDARD SEWER FACILITIES AND/OR SERVICE AGREEME!fF This Agreement is made and entered into this day of ,. 199_, by and between Eastern Municipal Water District of San Jacinto California. hereinafter referred to as District, and CII~/OF TEMECULA of TEMECULA , hereinafter referred to as Sponsor. WHEREAS, Sponsor is planning to develop [ ]'Tract FIRE STATION AT PAUBA ROAD or [ ] the development, within District's Improvement District No. 34 and Sewer Service Area No. U-8, which is generally shown and depicted as the Subject Development on the map attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as Exhibit A: and WHEREAS, Sponsor is desirous of making financial and other arrangements with District for [X] the sewer system facilities to serve the Subject Development and/or for [X] sewer service therefor: and WHEREAS, the sewer system facilities which are generally shown and depicted as the Subject Sewer Facilities on the map attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as Exhibit B are necessaryto so provide sewer service for said Subject Development: and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement and the hereinbelow designated exhibits, which are attached hereto and by this and other references herein made parts hereof. is to set forth and cover the detailed financial and other arrangements, by and between District and Sponsor, which shall be associated with the [X] planning, designing, furnishing, construction and installation of the Subject Sewer Facilities. the estimated cost of which is $ 96,840.00 as developed and shown in the Preliminary Estimate of Cost which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as Exhibit C and the ownership, operation and maintenance thereof and/or [X] the provision of sewer service therethrough for the Subject Development following their completion: and WHEREAS,. upon Sponsor's fulfillment of all its obligations and responsibilities provided for in this Agreement and District's applicable Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Provision of Sewer System Facilities and Service, which are hereinafter sometimes referred to as District's Rules and Regulations, and the completion of the Subject Se~er Facilities District shall accept, own, operate and maintain said Subject Sewer Facilitie~ and make sewer service available therethrough for Sponsor's Subject Development (and other lands, developments and inhabitants which are accessible thereto)in accord with and pursuant to said District's Rules and Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration of the above recited premises, together with the mutual covenants hereincontained and attached hereto, it is agreed that: Appl i cable Standard Sewer Faci 1 i ties Aqreement Related Provi si ons, Terms and Condi ti ons Each and all of the provisions. terms and conditions set forth in the Applic' Standard Sewer Facilities Agreement Related Provisions. Terms and Conditions, which attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as Exhibit D. that have bee~ designated (by an "x" mark in the Applicable [ ] for that purpose) as being applicable in Paragraphs 2. and 3. hereinbelow shall be applicable for purposes of this Agreement and shall be appropriately applied. fulfilled and complied with by District and Sponsor. Sponsor's Obliqations and Responsibilities Sponsor agrees to fulfill and/or perform each and all of the following listed obligations and responsibilities which are herein designated as being Applicable for Purposes of this Agreement (by an "x" mark in the [ ] for that purpose) in accord and compliance with the provisions. terms and conditions set forth in the respective referred to subparagraph(s) of attached Exhibit D and/or paragraph(s) of this Agreement: Sponsor's Obligations/ Responsibilities Relative to: Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost(c) Pursuant to: Paragraph(s) Exhibit/ /Subpara- This Agree- qraph(s) of: merit(a) A.1)/4.A.&4.B. D/Hereof Not Appli- Appli- cable cable (b) (b) [x] [ ] Planning. Designing & Preparation of P1 ans/Speci fi cati ons (c) Furnishing & ConsTruction(c) A.2) D A.3) D [x] [ ] [x] [ ~- D. Inspection of Construction(c) A.4) D Ix] [ _ Field Engineering Surveys & Compaction/ Material s Strength Tests A.5) D [x] [ ]' Preconstruction Conferepce/Activity/ Coordination/Designation Authorized Representative A.6) D [x] [ ] G. City/County Road Permits A.7) D [x] [ ] Easements: Involving Lands of Others Involving Lands of Sponsor A.8) D A.9) D [x] [ ] [x] [ ] Deeds: Involving Lands Qf Others Involving Lands of Sponsor A.iO) D A.11) D [ ] Ix] [ ] Ix] J. Separate Cost Accounting Records A.12) D [x] [ ] K. Furnish Separate Cost Accounting Records A.13) D [x] [ ] Conveyance of Ownership(c) A.14) [x] [ ] Payment to District to Cover District's: Engineer/Inspection Expenses Materials/Construction Expenses A.15)a)/6.A. D/Hereof [X] [ ] A.15)b)/6.B. D/Hereof [X] [ ] N. Irrevocable Instrument of Credit A.16)5.G D/Hereof [ ] [X] O. Environmental= Information/Assistance A.17) D :[X] [ ] Sponsor Holding District Harmless Payment of Appl i cable Di strict Charges Bi 11 i ng to Di strict for Di strict' s Fixed Final Financial Participation A.18) D [X] [ ] A.19)/6.C.,6.D., 6.E. & 6.F. D/Hereof [X] [ ] A.20) D [ ] [X] Annexation of Land to Improvement Di strict A.21/13. D/Hereof [ ] [X] T. Formati on of New Improvement Di strict A.21/13. D/Hereof [ ] [X] U. Assessment Districts A.22) D [ ] [X] V. Street Addresses A.23) D [X] [ ] Special Terms, Conditions and/or Requirements A.24) [X] [ ] X. Backfl ow Device .[ ] [x] Y. Treatment P1 ant Locati on Noti fi cati on [ ] [x] (a) Hereof. (b) For the Purposes of this Agreement. (c) Of or to the Subject Sewer Facilities. District's Obliqations and Responsibilities District agrees to fulfill and/or perform each and all of the following listed obligations and responsibilities which are herein designated as being Applicable for the Purposes of this Agreement (by an "x" mark in the [ ] for that purpose) in accord and compliance with the provisions. terms and conditions set forth in the respective referred to subparagraph(s) of attached Exhibit D and/or paragraph(s) of thisAgreement: District's Obligations/ Responsibilities Relative to: Fixed Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost(c) Pursuant to: Paragraph(s) Exhibit/ /Subpara- This Agree- qraph(s) of: ment(a) B.1)/4.C. D/Hereof Not Appl i - Appl i - cable cable (b) (b) [ ] Ix] B. Plan Review/Approval & Construction Inspection B.2) D [x]. [ ~ Furnishing and Construction of Portions(c) Acceptance, Ownership, O&M, & Service Responsibilities B.3) B.4)/12. D [ ] [x] D/Hereof [X] [ ] Determination of Final Total Costs Determination of Sponsor's Final Financial Participation B.5)/8. B.6)/8. D/Hereof [X] [ ] D/Hereof [X] [ ] G. District Holding Sponsor Harmless B.7) Ix] [ ] (a) Hereof. (b) For the Purposes of this Agreement. (c) Of the Subject Sewer Facilities. Sponsor's and District's Financial Participations in the Cost of the Sub.iect Sewer Faci 1 i ties A. Sponsor's Final Financial Participation(a) Sponsor shall finance the Final Total Cost (actual cost) of the Subject Sewer Facilities less the amount, if any, of District's Fixed Financial Participation provided for in Subparagraph 4.C. hereinbelow. The resulting cost to Sponsor, ~- determined by District, is hereinafter referred to as Sponsor's Final Finant Participation. (a) In addition to making payment(s) of applicable District Charges pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 6. hereinbelow. Sponsor's Estimated Financial Participation(a) - Basis for Estab!ishinq the fixed Amounts of Credits to Which Sponsor Will be Entitled Based on the $ 96,840.00 estimated cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities developed in Exhibit C, District's Fixed Financial Participation, in the amount of $ -O- as provided for in Subparagraph 4.C. hereinbelow, Sponsor's Estimated Financial Participation (the estimated cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities minus District's Fixed Financial Participation, if any) is $96,840.00 Notwithstanding any other provisions set forth in this Agreement, it is hereby specifically agreed that the amounts of Nonreimbursable and Potentially Reimbursable Credits to which Sponsor shall be entitled pursuant to the provision of Paragraph 9. hereinbelow in consideration of Sponsor's Final Financial Participation shall be determined by District based on the amount of Sponsor's Estimated Financial Participation, Exhibit C and dimensions/lengths shown on maps/plans of the Subject Development approved by District. (a) In addition to making payment(s) of applicable District Charges pursuant provisions of Paragraph 6. hereinbelow. C o District's Fixed Financial Participation District's Fixed Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities shall amount to the sum of $ -0- as developed in the Computation of District Financial Participation attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as Exhibit E. Such District Financial Participation, if any, shall be paid to Sponsor as provided for in Paragraph 7. hereinbelow. Documents to be Furnished to District by Sponsor Sponsor shall furnish each and all of the following listed documents, which are herein designated as being Applicable for the Purposes of this Agreement (by an "x" mark in the [ ] for that purpose) and which have been duly executed by Sponsor or the involved other party, to District in accord with the indicated time schedule for each respective document: B. C. D. E. F. K o Document(s) City/County Road Permits Easements Deeds Separate Cost Accounting Records Bill of Sale Time Certificate of Deposit in the Amount of $ 2.000.00 Irrevocable Instrument of Credit in the Amount of $ -O- Petition for Annexation to or Formation of Improvement District Billing for District's Fixed Financial Participation List of Approved Stree~ Addresses for Lots/Units of the Tract/ Development to be Served Treatment Plant Location Notification (a) Hereof. (b) Pursuant to: Not Paragraph(s) Exhibit/To be Appli-Appli- /Subpara- This Agree- Fur- cable cable qraph(s) of: ment(a) nished (b) (b) A.7) D (c) IX] [ ] A.8)&A.9) D (c) [X] [ ] A.10)&A.11) D/G&H (c) [ ] [X] A.12)&A.13) D (d) [X] [ ] A.14) D/F (e) [X] [ ] A.4) D (e) I'.] A.16) D (e) [ ] [X] A.21)/13. D/Hereof (e) [ ] [X] A.20/2.R. D/Hereof (f) [ ] [X] A.23) D (e) For the Purposes of this Agreement. [X] [ ] [ ] [X] (c) Not less than 15 calendar days before construction of the involved facili*-~, is to begin. (d) Within 90 calendar days after District's acceptance of the Subject Sew~. Faci 1 i ties. (e) Concurrently with Sponsors execution and delivery of this Agreement to Di strict. (f) Within 30 calendar days after District's acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities· Cash Payments to be Made by SDonsor to District Sponsor shall make each and all of the rollowing listed cash payments, which are herein designated as being Applicable for the Purposes of this Agreement (by an "x" mark in the [ ] for that purpose), to District concurrently with Sponsor's execution and delivery of this Agreement to District: Not Pur- Appli- bppli- suant cable cable Payment of/for: to: Amount (a) (a) Estimated Engineering & Inspection Expenses (b) $ 5,310.00 (c) D(] [ ] Estimated Materials Furnishing & Construction Expenses (d) 0.00 (c) [ ] [X] Nonreimbursable Basic Sewer Frontage Charges (e) 0.00 (f) [ ] Nonreimbursable Special Sewer Frontage Charges (g) 0.00 (h) [ ] IX] Sewer System & Disposal Facilities Financial Participation Charges (i) 1.955.00 (j) [x] [ ] Sewer Treatment P1 ant Capacity Financial Participation Charges (k) 1,890.00 (j) [X] [ ] Water for Facilities/Plumbing Testing Purposes (1) 0.00 (m) [ ] [X] TOTAL $ 9,155.00 Less Initial Partial Payment of Engineering Expenses Paid on 8/8/95 $ Less Previous Fees Paid on $ 1.500.00 0.00 Combined Total to be Remitted with Signed Copies of this Agreement 7,655.00 (a) For the Purposes of this Agreement. (b) Subparagraph A.15)a) of Exhibit D. (c) Subject to future adjustment pursuant to Subparagraph A.15) of Exhibit D. (d) Subparagraph A.15)b) of Exhibit D. (e) Section ll.01 of District's applicable Rules and Regulations, Resolution No. 1643(n). (f) Fixed amount, notsubject to adjustment. (g) Section ll.04 of District's applicable Rules and Regulations, Resolution No. 1643(n). (h) Fixed amount, not subject to adjustment. (i) District's Amended Sewer. System and Disposal Facilities Financial Participation Charge Policy (Resolutions Nos. 1641 and 1642, both as amended). (j) Comprised of payments by Sponsor; Credit to Sponsor in consideration of Sponsor's Final Financial Participation pursuant to Subparagraph 9.B.3) hereinbelow; Credit assigned from another document; and applicable assessment district Community Facilities District related Credit (as appropriate), subject to future adjustment responsive to the provisions of Subparagraph 16.B. hereinbelow and/or future changes in the Subject Development and attendant increases in sewer service requirements. (k) District's Amended Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity Financial Participation Charge Policy (Resolutions Nos. 1599 and 1600, both as amended). (1) Section 9.04(m) of District's applicable Rules and Regulations. (m) Subject to future adjustment based on water use as measured or otherwise reasonably determi ned by Di stri ct's Staff. (n) As amended. Payment to be Made bv District to Sponsor District shall make payment of its Fixed Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities, if any, provided for in Subparagraph 4.C. hereinabove and attached Exhibit E, responsive to its receipt of an appropriate, as determined by District, billing therefor rendered by Sponsor pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.20) of attached Exhibit D, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of such billing. Determination of the Total Final Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities and Sponsors Financial Participation by District Following completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities and receipt of Sponsor's Separate Cost Accounting Records pursuant to Subparagraph A.13) of Exhibit D, District shall determine the Total Final Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities and the amount of Sponsor's Final Financial Participation therein, pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraphs B.5) and B.6) of Exhibit D. and Subparagraphs 3.E. an 3.F. hereinabove. Credits to Sponsor Toward Payment of Applicable District Charqes Based on the provision of Subparagraph 4.B. hereinabove and Sponsor's payment of District Charges pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 6. hereinabove. District will (in its records) credit Sponsor with payment of applicable District Charges in the below indicated respective amounts, which credits and all terms. conditions and rights associated therewith shall be individually covered and provided for in the respective listed separate related documents: District Charqe/Surcharqe/Pursuant to: Amount of Credit Related Separate Docu~ A. Credits for Nonreimbursable District Charqes Paid by Sponsor l) Basic Sewer Frontage Charges/ Subparagraph 6.C.(a) $ 0.00 Frontage Charge/Surcharge Receipt No. 2) Special Sewer Frontage Charges/ Subparagraph 6.D.(a) 0.00 Frontage Charge/Surcharge Receipt No. 3) Sewer System and Disposal Facilities Financial Partici- pation Charges/Subparagraph 6.E.(a) 1,955.00 (b) Sewer System and Disposal Facilities Financial Participation Charge Receipt No. 4) Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity Financial Participation Charges/Subparagraph 6.F.(a) 1,890.00 Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity Financial Participation Charge Receipt No. Credits for Nonreimbursable District Charqes Credited in Consideration of Sponsor's Final Financial Participation 1) 2) 3) Basic Sewer Frontage Charges/ Sec. 11.01, Res. No. 1643(c) Special Sewer Frontage Charge/ Sec. 11.04, Res. No. 1643(c) Sewer System and Disposal Facilities Financial Part. Chgs. Subparagraph 6.E.(a)(d) 0.00 0.00 Frontage Charge/Surcharge Receipt No. Frontage Charge/Surchat Receipt No. 0.00 Sewer System and Disposal Facilities Fin. Part. Chg Receipt No. Credits for Potentially Reimbursable District Charc~es Credited in Consideration of Sponsor's Final Financial Participation 1) Additional Basic Sewer Frontage Charges/Sec. 11.02, Res. No. 1643(c) 0.00 Frontage Charge/Surcharge Receipt No. 2) 3) Additional Capacity Charges/ Sec. 11.03o Res. No. 1643(c) Additional Special Sewer Frontage Charges/Sec. 11.05, Res. No. 1643(c) 0.00 0.00 Potentially Reimbursable Additional Capacity Chg. Agreement No. Frontage Charge/Surcharge Receipt No. (a) Of this Agreement. (b) Covers both cash payment and credit in consideration of Sponsors Final Financial Participation (as applicable). (c) As amended. (d) As computed and provided for in Exhibit I (Special Terms. Conditions and/or Requirements). The applicable Related Separate Documents Identified under this Paragraph 9.. which are hereinafter referred to as the Subject Documents and which shall be prepared by District and appropriately executed under the same date as this Agreement, shall be held by District until the Subject Sewe~ Facilities have been accepted by District pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 12. hereinbelow and Sponsor has furnished its Separate Cost Accounting Records to District pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.13) of Exhibit D. Following such acceptance and receipt of Sponsor's Separate Cost Accounting Records. a copy of each Subject Document will be promptly furnished to Sponsor by District. Sponsor shall not be entitled to any reimbursements pursuant to the Subject Documents while they are being so held by District. 10. District's Riqht to Complete the Sub.iect Sewer Facilities Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, it is hereby specifically agreed that: If Sponsor has not taken all actions necessaryto cause construction of the Subject Sewer Facilities to be furnished, installed and constructed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) to have been begun by Sponsor's Contractor(s) within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of this Agreement; or In the event at.any time after construction of the Subject Sewer Facilities has been begun by Sponsor's Contractor(s). Contractor(s) or Sponsor. for'any reason. causes work toward completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities to be interrupted, delayed and/or discontinued for a period of more than thirty (30) calendar days, without written District approval; or Construction of the Subject Sewer Facilities to be furnished, installed and constructed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) has not been completed by the completion date specified in Sponsor's contract(s) with Sponsor's Contractor(s), or such later date as District has given Sponsor written approval for; and D. If Sponsor, after having been given written notice by District: 1) Specifying the involved problem (related to the provisions of Subparagraph IO.A., iO.B. or IO.C. above); 2) Allowing Sponsor ,a reasonable period of time within which to take remedial actions which are satisfactory to District: and 3) Stating District's intentions to exercise its rights under this Paragraph 10. if such a satisfactory remedial action is not taken by Sponsor within the allowed remedial time period. has not taken remedial action which is satisfactory to the District within tb~_ remedial period set forth in said notice to Sponsor. District is hereby granted ~ unqualified right to take such steps as it reasonably determines to be necessa. and appropriate to complete all or such portions of said Subject Sewer Facilitie~ as District determines necessary for its purposes. in which event: Sponsor shall be exclusively responsible for any and all legal and/or financial ramifications and/or settlements with Sponsor's Contractor(s): District shall have the unqualified right to demand and. receive payment(s) under the Irrevocable Instrument of Credit provided for in Subparagraphs 2.N. and 5.G. hereinabove to, together with District's Financial Participation provided for in Subparagraph 4.C. hereinabove, finance such completion of all or such portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities as District determines necessary for its purposes: and The amount(s) of Sponsor's potentially reimbursable amounts provided for in Subparagraph 9.C. hereinabove. if any. shall, at District's discretion, be reduced by the amount, if any, of District's total expenditures toward the cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities which exceeds the total combined amount of its $ -O- Fixed Final Financial Participation provided for in Subparagraph 4.C. hereinabove and the Irrevocable Instrument of Credit payments it receives pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph iO.F. above. 11. Force Ma.ieure If either the District or the Sponsor is delayed, hindered or prevented from performing any term of this Agreement, or if any condition precedent or condition subsequenL. hereunder either occurs or is precluded from occurring, by any reason beyond eith party's control, including without limitation any strike, walkout, inability to procul. material, failure of power, restrictive laws or regulations, riot, war, act of God or the default of the other party, then such performance or condition will be. as applicable. either excused or tolled during the period of delay and the applicable time period or deadline will be extended by a period equal to the period of such delay, in which event the provisions of this Agreement shall be formally amended and modified in writing as necessary to address and cover all changes, including, but not-limited to. costs and financial participations of the Parties, made necessary by the problem(s) which caused the delays and the resolution(s) thereof prior to continuing with the planning, furnishing andinstallation of the Subject Sewer Facilities. 12. Acceptance of Ownership of the Subject Sewer Facilities As provided in Subparagraph B.4) of attached Exhibit D. the Subject Sewer Facilities will be accepted by District for ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of sewer service purposes only following their satisfactory completion and Sponsor's fulfillment of all its obligations and responsibilities provided for in this Agreement and its attached exhibits. all as determined by District. District acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities is further conditioned and contingent upon the completion of other sewer system facilities covered by any other agreement, by and between District and Sponsor or other party(ies) which are necessary to make sewer service available to the Subject Sewer Facilities, all as determined by District. 10 14. Applicable Special Sewer Service Limitations No sewer service will be provided to the Sub.iect Development from or through the Subject Sewer Facilities by District until they have been accepted by District., as provided for in Paragraph 12. hereinabove: Sponsor has completed arrangements, including, but not limited to, payment of all applicable District Charges, with District for such service(s) in accord with District's applicable Rules and Regulations; and, if applicable, leqal proceedinQs, resultinq in the annexation of the lands to be occupied by the Sub.iect Development to the appropriate existinq District improvement district or the formation of a new District improvement district which includes SDonsor-'s involved lands as discussed in SubDaraqraph A.21) of attached.Exhibit D and SubparaqraDhs 2.S.. 2.T. and 5.H. hereinabove. have been completed bv District with Sponsor's assistance and cooperation, all as determined by District. Following the satisfactory completion of construction and testing and before its acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities, District will make sewer service available for construction related purposes only from and through the Subject Sewer Facilities under a separate Special Interim Construction Sewer Service Agreement, by and between District and Sponsor, Sponsor's compliance with and fulfillment of the terms and conditions of such a Special Interim Construction Sewer Service Agreement shall be a prerequisite condition to District's acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities for ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of sewer service purposes, in the same manner as if such terms and conditions were set forth herein. No Occupancy of the Sub.iect Development Before District Acceptance of Ownership of the Sub.iect Sewer Facilities and Completion of Applicable Improvement District Annexation or Formation Leqal Proceedinqs Sponsor hereby specifically agrees not to permit any portion or unit of the Subject Development to be occupied for any residential, commercial or industrial purpose, as applicable, which requires sewer service until the Subject Sewer Facilities have been accepted by District for ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of service purposes, as provided for in Paragraph 12. hereinabove; Sponsor has completed arrangements, including, but not limited to, payment ef all applicable District Charges, with District for such service(s) in accord with District's applicable Rules and R~gulations: and, if applicable, legal roceedings resulting in the annexation of the lands to be occupied by the Subject DevelOpment to the appropriate District improvement district or the formation of a new District improvement district, which includes said involved lands, have been completed by District, as discussed in Paragraph 13 hereinabove. 15. Additional Arranqements Required for Phased Development The provisions of this Agreement are based upon the development of the Subject Sewer Facilities and the Subjec/c Development as a single phase project. Any and all subsequent changes of plans which result in a multi-phased project for the provision of the Subject Sewer Facilities and/or the provision of sewer service to the entire Subject Development must be arranged for under an appropriate written and duly executed amendment(s) or supplement(s) to this Agreement or a new separate agreement or agreements as determined by District. 11 16o Aqreement and District Charqes Applicability Limitations A. Relative to This Entire Aqreement This entire Agreement, including all its provisions, shall automatically be cancelled and become null and void if it has not been executed on behalf of Sponsor and District and Sponsor has not fulfilled all of its financial arrangement and document furnishing obligations and responsibilities, which are hereinabove required to be fulfilled concurrently with Sponsor's execution of this Agreement. on or before JANUARY 30 .. , 199~: and Relative to District Charqes For the portion(s)/unit(s) of the Subject Sewer Facilities and/or the Subject Development which have not been completed (as hereinbelow defined) by Sponsor on or before MAY 30 , 1997 , as determined by District, the amounts of all District Sewer Frontage, Addit'~onal Capacity, Sewer System and Disposal Facilities Financial Participation and Sewer Treatment Capacity Financial Participation Charges to be paid by Sponsor (pursuant to Subparagraphs 6.C., 6.D., 6.E. and 6.F. hereinabove) or credited by District in consideration of Sponsor's Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities (pursuant to Subparagraphs 9.B. and 9.C. hereinabove) shall be subject to adjustment(s) which will reflect, include and cover the full per unit amounts of such District Charges which are applicable at the time(s) the involved portion(s) of the Subject Sewer Facilities and/or unit(s) of the Subject Development have been completed (as defined hereinbelow), all as determined by District. In this regard, it is specifically understood an~ agreed that Sponsor-- shall pay the full amount(s) of such adjusted District Charge(s), as a prerequisi condition to District acceptance of the involved portion(s) of the Subject Sew~. Facilities and/or the provision of water and sewer service to the involved unit(s) of the Subject Development by District. For the purposes of this Subparagraph 16.B., the word completed shall: Relative to the Subject Sewer Facilities, mean those Subject Sewer Facilities which have been accepted and placed into service-by District: and Relative to the units of the Subject Development, mean those units which have been certified for occupancy by the County of RiVerside or the involved city (as appropriate), all as determined by District. 17. Preparation of This Aqreement This Agreement shall not b~ construed against the party preparing it, but shall be construed as if both parties prepared it. 18. Purpose of Captions Captions to Paragraphs are for convenience purposes only and are not part of this Agreement. 12 19. Bi ndi nq Provi si on This Agreement is binding on the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT (District) AI'FEST: By Mary C. White, Board Secretary John B. Brudin, General Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: REDWINE AND SHERRILL (Sponsor) (Signature) (lype Name and litle) (lype Mailing Address) EB'56b Developer City of Temecula W.O./C.O. f96-2C6 Est'r. Initials CFW COST ESTIMATB OF SEWER FACILITIES Fire StatiOn Tract Pauba Rd. ~ I.D./S.A.# U-8 Date 11/15/95 Super Intials VffB Typist Initials tlvt Implementing Facilities: Yes X No ,' ' List PrQposed 8" sewer per new community Lutheran Church (Per SD-11702~to SD-11704) Sewer Easement: Yes In Project Work AuthOrization= Yes__ No X Sewer Backflow Valves: Offsite__ Required Lots: No X ' Treatment Plant Notification: Needed Not Needed A. Sewer Line Installation: 2271 L.F. - 8' sewer main · x B. Installation of Manholes and Cleanouts: 6 ea - 48" die. std. Manhole: 1 ea. - 48" die. Terminus mahole: 1 ea - on-site f.ateral cleanout C. Miscellaneous Installation: $ 63,450.00 i $ 10,600.00 Encasemerit D. T.V. 2271 Feet of Sewer Line $ 1.140.00 SUBTOTAL $ 75,190.00 Contingencies, add to subtotal immediately preceding (10%)--$ 7.520.00 SUBTOTAL- $ 82,710.00 Engineering (by Developer*s Engineer) add to subtotal immediately preceding ( 9.5 %1 $ 7.860.00 EMWD Plan Review** $ 1.~00.00 EMWD Inspection ~ add to subtotal immediately preceding- .S( 6.3t1 $ 4.170.00 As-builts 3 sheets X $200/sheet*** ........................ $ 600.00 ** 2 sheet or less $1000 3-9 sheets one system, water or sewer $1500 Two systems, water and sewer $2500@ 10 sheets or more One system, water or sewer $2000 Two systems, water and sewer $3000@ ***($100/sheet if you have water and sewer in same sheet) @(apply half the amount to each system cost estimate) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST - SEWER ,Estimated costs to be incurred by EMWD Typed original to New Business S96.840.00 APPLICABLE STANDARD SEWER FACILi m its ~bn:=m=,~, RELATED PROVISIONS. TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPONSOR'S OBLIGATIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES Sponsor shall fulfill. comply with and/or perform (as appropriate) each'el 1 of the following set forth obligations and responsibilities which have u~en designated as 'Applicable for the Purposes of This Agreement" in Paragraph 2. of the Agreement to which this Exhibit D is attached. which is hereinafter sometimes referred to as this Agreement: 1) Financial Participation in Final Total Cost of the Sub.iect Sewer Facilities. Sponsor shall finance the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities. in accord with the applicable provisions of Section 9.04 of the District's Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Provision of Sewer System Facilities and Service. less the amount. if any. of District's Fixed Final Financial Participation in such Final Total Cost pursuant to the 'sions of Sub eragraph B.1) hereinbelow. Such financing of the FPi~i~1 Total Cost. ~ss the amount Fi of Di strict' s xed Financial Participation. shall constitute Sponsor's Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities covered by this Agreement. 2) Pl anni no. Oesi eni no and PreDa rati on of Constructi on SDeci fi cati ons for the Sub.iect Sewer Faci 1 iti es Plans and Sponsor shall employ, at its sole expense, a properly qualified professional engineering firm or firms, hereinafter referred togas sponsor's Engineer<s} to plan, design and prepare detailed construe q lens and specifications for all of the Subject Sewer Facilities co~ j ~ythis Agreement, as they are generally shown on Exhibit B, in full and complete accordance with District design criteria and standards. All such pl anning and des i gn work and detai 1 ed . constructi on pl arts and specifications performed and prepared by Sponsor's Engineer(s) shall be subject to review and written a proval by District pri to the beginning of any construction of the involved Subject Sewer aci°r F liti.es. Such review and approval of pl arts and speci fi cati ons for the Subject Sewer Faci 1 i ti es. along with those for other projects, will be diligently processed by the Di stri ct' s Staff i n the order they are received. 3) Furnishino and Construction/Installation of the Sub.iect Sewer Facilities Following receipt of District approval of Sponsor's Engineer's(s') design of and construction plans and specifications for the Subject Sewer Facilities. Sponsor shall: a) Unless otherwise specifically authorized and approved by District in writing. request and receive at least four (4) competitive bids for the furnishing and construction/installation each and all segments/units of the Subject Sewer Facilities. in accord with said District approved plans and specifications. from qualified and properly licensed contractors approved by District. which approval will not be unreasonably delayed or withheld: and 1 EXHIB, J 4) 6~11S)9 t)le wrllil~en concurrLglce OT UISl~rlCl~. ~fipiuy u~m: Huoj,, ,:u ~l,~ properly licensed contractor(s) with the lowest bid(s) under eacr, respective involved specification. hereinafter referred to as Sponsor's Contractor(s). to. in accord with such District approve~ p lans and speci fi cati ons. furnish and construct/i nsta 11 the Subj ec-. Sewer Facilities. In keeping with District's policy anO notwithstanding other provisions of this Agreement and these Provisions. Terms and Conditions. in the event Sponsor. without having received prior written approval and consent from District employs other than the qualified and properly 1 i censed contractor(s i with the lowest bid(s) to furnish and install the Subject S~ver Facilities. the amount of Sponsor's credit for Potentially Reimbursable Additional Basic and/or Special Sewer Frontage and/or Capacity Charges. pursuant to the applicable provisions of Paragraph 9. of this Agreement (and separate documents referred to therein). shall be subject to such adjustments by District as District deems appropriate and necessary to result. insofar as is possible. in the amount of such credit being equal to the amount which would have resulted if Sponsor had employed the low bidding qualified and properly licensed Contractor(s). Sponsor shall directly pay all costs associated with such furnishing anO construction/installation of the Subject Sewer Facilities by Sponsor's Contractor(s). All facilities so furnished. constructed and installed by S onsor's Contractor(s) shall be installed in strict co liance with p~ans and specifications therefore which have been approv1~D in writing by District pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.2) hereinabove and Subparagraph B.2). hereinbelow. In this regard. any and all deviations from such approved plans and/or specifications must be approved by District. in writing. prior to being made Such District approval shall be given as expeditiously as possible. ' Inspection of Construction bv SDonsor's Contractor(s) Sponsor shall and does hereby appoint District to inspect the,furnishing and construction/installation of all of the Subject Sewer Facilities and the performance of the involved work associated therewith-to be performed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) for compliance with the a proved detailed construction plans and specifications as provided for in~ubparagraph A.2) hereinabove and Subparagraph B.2} hereinbelow. It is specifically understood that District's inspection personnel shall have the authority to reasonably enforce such District approved detailed construction plans and specifications for the involved facilities. which authority shall include the authority to require that any and all unacceptable materials. workmanship and/or installation be replaced. repaired or corrected by Sponsor's Contractor(s) at said Sponsor's Contractor's(s') nonreimbursable expense. , District's inspection provided for herein. does not include inspection for compliance with safety requirements by Sponsor's Contractor(s). In addition. Sponsor's Contractor(s) shall be required to repair any and all installed facilities which have been damaged by any party. at no expense to District. prior to District's final acceptance of the 2' EXHIBIT D 5) faclill~les covereO hereby, wnlcn Tinal accept~arlce ~i)~,~ ~u~,~- .... ~, i nspecti on, i nc 1 udi ng tel evi si on inspecti on, and testi ng of s ucr faci l ities after completion of all improvements, including otheT utilities curbs and paving. In this regard, Sponsor specifically agrees to requir~ Sponsor's Contractor(s) responsible for the installation of said Subject Sewer Facilities .to so make the corrections and/or rr-~rs determined to be necessary by District inspection personnel and tD p de for and require of each Sponsor's Contractor a one-year (following da~ of final acceptance by District) materials and workmanship guarantee providing that said Sponsor's 'Contractor will repair, at its expense, all failures of facilities which it furnished, constructed and/or installeC due to faulty materials or ~nstallation, including settlement of backfi 11 within said one-year period, Said guarantee shall be secured, insofar a_ District is concerned, by a Time Certificate of Deposit ~n favor o~ District in the amount set forth in Subparagraph 5, F. of this Agreement tc be furnished by Sponsor to District concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Said Time Certificate of Deposit shall remain in effect until canceled by District. Said Time Certificate of Deposit shall be satisfactory to District. as to form and content and involved financial firm. and shall guarantee Sponsor's payment to District for its incurred costs of making any necessary repairs associated with faci 1 iti es furni shed. constructed and/or installed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) in the event Sponsor fails to cause satisfactory repair. as determined by District. of facilities or failures by Sponsor's Contractor(s) or others within 48 hours or such other longer period of time as District may reasonably determine and specify in its repair notification. based on the nature and extent of the needed repair. following notification of the need therefor by District. Notwithstanding the above provided for 48-hour or other speci fled repai r period. District shall have the unqualified right to in~nediately make any emergency repairs necessary to eliminate any threat to the pub~"~s health. safety or welfare and to ensure continuity of service at Spon. s nonreimbursabl e expense. Field Enoineerino Surveys and Compaction and Materials Strenoth Tests Associated With Construction by SDonsor's Contractor(s ) Sponsor's Engineer(s) shall provide all field engineering surveys associated with the construction of each and all of the Subject Sewer Facilities and/or related work to be furnished, constructed/installed and/or performed by Sponsor's Contractor(s ), i ncl udi ng bui 1 di ng/ structure, facility, fitting and service horizontal and vertical location staking, as determined necessary by Sponsor's Engineer(s), Sponsor's Contractor(s), and/or District's inspection personnel, at Sponsor's direct expense. Sponsor shall promptly furnish to District all field notes and grade sheets, together with location, offset, and attendant data and reports, resul ting from Sponsor' s Engineer' s(s' ) fi el d engi neeri ng surveys and/or proppsed facility design changes, all of which have been prepared in accordance with accepted professional engineering practices, and allow District sufficient time to approve or make any required facility design changes resulting therefrom prior to construction, which District approvals and/or design changes will be processed as expeditiously as possible. 3 EXHI,, O 6) 7) 8) Sponsor snail be responsible for paying all sol ~ compac~on. steel strength tests and report costs associated with the Subject Sewer Facilities to be so furnished and constructed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) required by Sponsor's Engineer(s), appropriate public agency officials prompt y furnisn and/or District inspection personnel, Sponsor shall 1 results of all such compaction and concrete and steel strength testing to District for its review, evaluation and decision as to compliance with applicable specifications, which review evaluation and decision District shall make every reasonable effort to c___nn~lete within 72 hours after its receipt of each involved test result, Preconstructi on Conference(s ) and Activity Coordi nat~ on and Desi anati on of Sponsor' s Authorized Representative Sponsor shall be exclusively responsible for coordinating the activities of. all its contractors, including S onsor's Contractor(s) hereunder. engaged in its development program, ~D~ this regard, it is specifically understood and agreed that a preconstruction conference(s) shall be arranged for and scheduled by Sponsor and District personnel shall be invited to attend and participate in any and all such preconstruction conferences cDncerning the Subject Sewer Facilities to be constructed and the other work to be performed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) hereunder. It shall also be the responsibility of the Sponsor and Sponsor's Contractor(s) to hold safety conferences as required by law. At or prior to the above provided for preconstruction conference(s), Sponsor shall officially, in writing, designate those who have authority to represent Sponsor, relative to the furnishing and construction/ installation of the Subject Sewer Facilities and shall imediately advise the District of any subsequent changes in such authorized representation. City Street and/or County Road Department Construction and Operate and Maintain Permits for the Sub.iect Sewer Facilities For those portions, if any, of the Subject Sewer Facilities which are to be constructed/installed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) within an existing City street and/or County road, Sponsor, at its expense and in accord with the schedule requirements set forth in Subparagraph-E,A, of this Agreement, shall be responsible for obtaining a Construction Permit from the involved city or the Riverside County Road Department (as appropriate) covering the construction and installation of the involved facilities. At the same time such Construction Permit is obtained by Sponsor, the involved city or the Riverside County Road Department (as appropriate) will issue an Operate and Maintain Permit to District, which will become effective upon the completion of the involved Subject Sewer Facilities by Sponsor's Contractor(s) and District's acceptance thereof for ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of service purposes. Easements Involvino the Private Property of Others For those portions, i f any, of the Subject Sewer Faci 1 i ti es, i ncl udi ng access roads, which are to be constructed and/or graded by Sponsor's Contractor(s) within and across private property not owned by S onsor, including those facilities, if any, which will ultimately be ~ocated within future public streets, Sponsor shall, in accord with the schedule 4 EXHIBIT D 9) requ]remenl:s sel: Torl:n 1n 5uDparagrapn D.~. ol ~i~ ~,:::~,:,,~. .,, cos~ to Dis~ri~. furnish to Distri~ an eas~en~ docmen~'~T: satisfactory to O~s~ric: as to the location and width of the ~nvolvec eas~ent parcel(s) and the con~en~ and fore of the easement dockend(s). which has(have) been duly ~t~ by ~e ~nvo]ved property ~ner(s) anc which assure(s) Ois~rict's unequ~vocal right to own. operate. ma~n. replace. repair and provide service through the ~nvolved port~on(~) he Subjec~ S~er Facilities. Easements Involvino Soonsor Owned Lands For those portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities. including access roads. which are to be constructed and/or graded by Sponsor's Contractor(s). within and across property owned by Sponsor. inctudinc those facilities which will ultimately be located within'future publi~ streets. Sponsor shall. in accord with the schedule requirements set forth in Subparagraph 5.B. of this Agreement. ~thout cost to District. furnish to District an easement document(s). satisfactory to District as to the location and width of the involved easement parcel(s) and the content and 'form of the easement document(s). which has(have) been duty executed by Sponsor and which assure(s) District's unequivocal right to own. operate. maintain. replace. repair and provide service through the involved portion(s) of the Subject Sewer Facilities. 10) Grant Deeds Involvino the Private Property of Others Sponsor. for the dollar consideration, if any, set forth in Exhibit C (Preliminary Estimate of Cost for the Subject Sewer Facilities) attached to this Agreement (which dollar consideration shall constitute a part of the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities covered by this Agreement), shall, in accord with the schedule requirements set forth in Subparagraph 5.C. of this Agreement, furnish to District a Grant ~'~-d document(s), satisfactory to District as to content and form, h has(have) been duly executed by the involved property owner(s), conveying to District clear unencumbered fee title to the parcel(s) of land shown on the map attached to this Agreement as Exhibit G for the purpose(s) described on said Exhibit G, if applicable for the purposes of this Agreement. 11) Grant Deeds Involvino Lands of Sponsor Sponsor. for the dollar consideration. if any. set forth in Exhibit C (Preliminary Estimate of Cost for the Subject Sewer Facilities} attached to this Agreement (which dollar consideration shall constitute a part of the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities covered by this Agreement). shall, in accord with the schedule requirements set forth in Subparagraph 5.C. of this Agreement. furnish to District a Grant Deed document(s). satisfactory to District as to content and form. which has(have) ~een duly executed by Sponsor. conveying to District clear unencumbered fee title to the parcel(s) of land shown on the map attached to this Agreement as Exhibit H for the purpose(s) described on said Exhibit H. if applicable for the purposes of this Agreement. 5 EXHI O 1Z) $eDarate Cost Accountlna Recoras To. among other things. accommodate District's -sewer system cosZ capitalization records and facilitate the determination by District of the Final Total (actual) Cost of each segment/unit of the Subject Sever Facilities covered bythis Agreement. Sponsor shall establish and maintain individual separate accounting records under which all its engineering. furnishing and construction/installation expenses (excluding Sponsor's accounting expenses related to the Subject Sewer Facilities) related to the furnishing and construction/installation of each segment/unit of the Subject Sewer Facilities to be furnished and constructed/installed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) will be clearly individually shown and identified. 13) Furnishino of Cost Accountina Records to District As a prerequisite to 'becoming eligible to receive the Credits toward payment of applicable nonreimbursable and potentially reimbursable District Charges pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph g. of this Agreement. Sponsor shall, within 90 days after completion of construction of all of the Subject Sewer Facilities by Sponsor's Contractor(s) and the written acceptance thereof by District for ownership, operation. maintenance and provision of service purposes, furnish to District an accounting report (based upon and accompanied by the above required Sponsor's individual cost accounting records), which is satisfactory to Di strict as to form, content and documentati on. showing Sponsor' s tota 1 actual incurred engineering, furnishing and construction/installation costs for each segment/unit of the Subject Sewer Facilities. 14) Conveyance of Ownership Concurrentlywith its execution of thisAgreement, Sponsor shall, without cost to District. execute and deliver to Oistrict the Bill of Sale. which is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit F, conveying clear title to the Subject Sewer Facilities to be furnished and constructed/installed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) pursuant to this Agreement effective upon the completion of said Subject Sewer Facilities and the acceptance thereof by District for ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of service purposes. In this regard, it is specifically understood and agreed that District shall not be obligated to accept such title or to operate and rovide service through said Subject Sewer Facilities until satisfactory inal inspection, including television inspection, and testing thereof by District's inspection personnel has been completed and Sponsor has fully complied with all its obligations and res onsibilities rovided for in this Agreement and District's applicable ~les and Regulations. all as determined by District. 15) Payments to District to Cover Oistrict's Enaineerino and Insoection Exoenses and Furnishina and Construction Retated Exoenses Concurrently with its execution of this document, Sponsor shall make payment to District in the respective amounts provided for in Subparagraphs 6.A. and 6.B. of this Agreement to cover: a) District's estimated engineering and construction inspection related expenses incurred pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph B.2) hereinbelow: and 6 EXHIBIT D expenses incurred pursuant to the provisions of Subparagrapfi B.3) here1 nbet ow. which payments to District shall be subject to additional billing(s) tc Sponsor. which Sponsor shall pay within fifteen (15) calendar days oi<he date thereof. or refund(s) by District. which shall accompany D/st 's final cost accounting report to Sponsor. to result in Sponsor's payms.._ of District's actual incurred costs. as provided for in Subparagraph 8.2) and 8.3) hereinbelow. Such payment(s) to District of District's actual incurred costs shall constitute a portion of Sponsor's costs to be included in Sponsor's separate cost accDunting records provided for requi red by Subparagraph A. 12) hereinabove. 16) The Furnishino of an Irrevocable Instrument 'of Credit In order to guarantee payment of its Financial Participation in the cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities. as provided for in Subparagraph A.I) herei nabove. and payment of Di Strict' s incurred engi neeri ng and constructi on i nspecti on tel ated and material s furni shi ng and constructi on tel ated expenses resu1 ti ng from District' s ful fi 1 lment of its responsibilities under this Agreement and to insure District's ability to complete the Subject Sewer Facilities. pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 10. of this Agreement. in the event Sponsor and/or Sponsor's Contractor(s) do(es) not so complete them as herein envisioned and provided for Sponsor shall concurrently with the execution of this Agreement. fu~'nish District with an Irrevocable Instrument of Credit. or other security satisfactory to District in the initial amount provided for in Subparagraph 5.G. of this Agreement. which initial amount may be reduced periodically. as portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities are satisfactorily completed and the attendant costs are paid by Sponsor. to cover Sponsor's then estimated share of the remaining costs of ~ uncompleted portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities. as estimat~ ~ approved by District. Such Irrevocable Instrument of Credit shal~ oe satisfactory to District. as to form and content and the involved financial institution. and shall remain in full force and effect until all of the Subject Sewer Facilities have been completed by Sponsor's Contractor(s): Sponsor has fulfilled all of its financial participation and other obligations and responsibilities hereunder: and District has accepted the Subject Sewer Facilities for ownership. operation and maintenance and provision of service purposes. 17) The Furnishino of Environmental Information and Assistance Sponsor shall. at its sole expense. upon request by District. furnish District with such information as District deems reasonably necessary for the preparation of an Environmental i~n!r~ct Assessment. or. if necessary. as determined by District. Sponsor sh . at its sole expense. furnish to District a complete Environmental I~actReport relative to the facilities covered by t~is Agreement and the Subject Development. Notwithstanding the foregoing. in the event District is prevented from carrying out its responsibilities hereunder by reason of an act of God or other reasons beyond District's control. including but not limited to regulatory agency or legal actions involving environmental considerations. then District is relieved of its obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement. In this regard. nothing herein contained shall be construed or interpreted to 7 EXHIL ) require IJ1ST~I'lC~ CO [.aKe or par~lclpa~e lrl tiny ~c--ga, ab.,u~ ,~, ~.,= purpose of securing approval for the facilities covered by tins Agreemenu or the developments to be served thereby. A11 such 1 ega 1 acti on sha 11 be solely financed and conducted by. Sponsor. 18) Sponsor Holdina District Harmtess Sponsor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold District harmless frbm any and all claims for damage or damages to property or injuries to persons arising by reason of or in any m~nner connected with the operations covered by this Agreement that are to be performed by other than personnel and equipment supplied directly by District or a contractor(s) employed by District. Such indemnification shall include attorney's fees and court costs. 19) Payment of Applicable District Charaes Sponsor shall. if designated' a plicabie in Subparagraph 2.Q. of this Agreement. as a prerequisite con~iition for receiving sewer service through the Subject Sewer Facilities and in addition to its Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities. pay to District those of the following District Charges which are determined applicable by District: a) Nonreimbursable Basic and/or Special Sewer Frontage Charges. as provided for in Subparagraph 6.C. and 6.D.. respectively. of this Agreement: b) Sewer System and Disposal Faci l ities Financial Patti ci pati on Charges. as provided for i n Subparagraph 6. E. of this Agreement: and c) Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity Financial Participation Charges as provided for in Subparagraph 6.F. of this Agreement. 20) Billino to District for District's Fixed Financial Participation In the event the provisions of Subparagraph 4.C of this Agreement provide for District Fixed'Financial Participation in ~e Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities. Sponsor shall within thirty (30). calendar days after completion of the constructionZinstallation of the Subject Sewer Facilities by Sponsor's Contractor(s) and District's acceptance thereof for ownershi. operation and maintenance and provision of service purposes. bi 1 ? of District's Fixed Final Financi at the amount Di strict for Participation provided for in said Subparagraph 4.C. District shall. assuming such billing by Sponsor is in proper order. remit payment of its Fixed Final Financial Participation to Sponsor within fifteen (15} calendar days after receipt of the billing therefor from Sponsor. , 21) Improvement District Annexation/Formation Legal Proceedino Reouirements In accord with applicable District Rules. Regulations and Policy. Sponsor shall. if the lands to be occupied by the Subject Development are not already located within a District improvement district and if designated applicable in Subparagraphs 2.S.. 2.T. and 5.H. of this Agreement. furnish 8 EXHIBIT D CO U1Si~rlCl~ a petll~lon (on a (~ocumen; form Furnished Dy uls;rlc~j. wn~cn has been duly executed by the legal owners of all the involved lands. requesting either. as determined by District. annexation of the lands to be occupied by the Subject Development to the appropriate existing District improvement district or the formation of a new District improvement district which includes said involved lands as provided f~--in Subparagraph 5.H. of this Agreement. 22) Assessment District ReQuirements In accord with applicable District Policy, Rules and Regulations, and if designated applicable in Subparagraph 2.U.. Sponsor shall, if the lands to be occupied by the Subject Development are in one of the District's assessment districts and there has been .a subdivision of the subject property subsequent to 'said' assessment district formation, pay the assessment at the time of agreement execution or go through an apporti onment of. assessment di strict procedures administered by the Assessment District Coordinator. b) Upon completion of the construction of the involved assessment district financed facilities and the determination of the final combined and individua] cash assessments, the District shall determine and establish the mount of the portion, if any, of the cash assessment for each assessment parcel within the involved assessment district which is to be credited by District toward partial payment of applicable District front footage and financial partici pati on charges. 23) Street Addresses Sponsor shall concurrently with its execution and delivery of t~ Agreement to District (or as soon thereafter as possible) furnisr District a list of approved street addresses for the Lots/Units of Tract/Development to be served by the Subject Sewer Facilities. 24) Soecial Terms. Conditions and/or Reouirements Sponsor shall fulfill, comply with and/or perform (as appropriate) all Special Terms. Conditions and Requirements provided for-in Exhibit I attached to this Agreement (if indicated as applicable in Subparagraph 2.W. of this Agreement). 8. DISlt~ICT'S OBLIGAI'IONS/RESPONSIBILITIES District shall fulfill and/or perform each and all of the followingset forth obligations and responsibilities which have been designated as 'Applicable for the Purposes of this Agreement" in Paragraph 3. of this Agreement: 1) Fixed Financi,al Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Sub.iect Sewer Faci 1 ities Provided funds for that purpose are available. as determined by District. in accord with the provisions of Section 9.04 of District's Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Provision of Sewer System Facilities and Service.~District's Fixed (not subject to future development) Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities 9 EXHIBI. 2) the capacity (over and above the size and capacity necessary to serve Sponsor's Subject Development) of portions of the Subject Sewer Faci l iti es to be in accord with the District's sewer system planning for the involveO District improvement district or service area. all as determined by District. The amount of such District Financial Participation.. if any. shall be set forth in Subparagraph 4.C. of this Agreement. Plan Review and ADDrOyal and Construction Inspection District shall review the design and detailed construction plans and specifications prepared by Sponsor's Engineer(s) for the Subject Sewer Facilities submitted. pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.2) f hereinabove: inspect and test the facilities to be urnished and installed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) under this Agreement. pursuant to the provi s ions of Subparagraph A. 4) herei nabove: parti ci pate i n preconstruction conference(s) and activity coordination activities. pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.6} hereinabove: cooperate with Sponsor relative to easements. permits and/or fee title acquisitions. pursuant to Subparagraphs A. 7). A.8). A.9). A. lO} and A.11) hereinabove. as applicable: and all other obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement. except those associated with District's Fixed Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities. on an actual cost basis. In this regard. Sponsor has heretofore made and/or shall make payment(s) to District. to cover District's estimated expenses. pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.15)a) hereinabove and Subparagraph 6.A. of this Agreement. with the understanding that the total aggr ate amount of such payments based on estimated District expenses sh~l. lowing fol completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities and the final determination by District of its actual expenses for each involved segment/unit of the Subject Sewer Facilities. be subject to additional billing Cif the amount of the actual expenses exceeds Sponsor's previous payment[s]) or refund (if the amount of actual expenses is less than Sponsor's previous payment[s]}. Such Sponsor's payment of actual District shall constitute a part of Sponsor's cost fo;' each segment/unit ofe~een~u~ject Sewer Facilities to be included as a part of Sponsor's cost accounting report provided for and requi red by Subparagraph A. 12) hereinabove. 3) Furnishina and Construction of Portions of the Sub,iect Sewer Facilities Sponsor shall. unless otherwise agreed by District in writing. furnish the labor. materials. equipment and facilities necessary to connect the Subject Sewer Facilities to District's existing sewer system facilities and construct/install other portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities as provided for in the District approved plans and specifications for the Subject Sewe~ Facilities. on an actual cost basis (which includes overhead charges ). In this regard. Sponsor shall make payment to District. to cover District's estimated expenses. pursuantto the provisions of Subparagraph A)lS)b) hereinabove and Subparagraph 6.8. of this Agreement. with the understanding that the amount of such payment shall. following completion IO EXHIBIT O um ui,c ;uud~CC J~v~r rctCl ilI:le5 clrlcl clle [lil~l U~[.~l'li|,iiabiult u.y u,~, .~.~ its actual expenses, be subject to additional billing (if the amount the actual expenses exceeds Sponsor's previous payment[s]) or refund the amount of actual expenses is less than Sponsor's previous payment[s]). Such Sponsor's payment of actual District expenses shall constitute of Sponsor's cost for each segment of the Subject Sewer Facilities be included as a part of Sponsor's cost accounting report provided fo, and required by Subparagraph A.12) hereinabove. 4) Acceotance. Ownership. Ooeratino. Maintenance and Service Responsibilities Following completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities and the conveyance of ownership by Sponsor. pursuant to Subparagraph A.14) hereinabove anc Subparagraph 5.E. of this Agreement. and acceptance of such ownership by District following such S onsor conveyance and fulfillment of its obligations and responsibi~ties under this Agreement and District's applicable Rules and Regulations and.subject to the Applicable Special Sewer Service Limitations provided for in Paragraph 13. of this Agreement. District shall own. operate. maintain and assume all responsibilities and liabilities associated with the Subject Sewer Facilities. under its involved program. and provide sewer service to the lands. developments and inhabitants accessible thereto in full accord with and pursuant to its the rovision of prevailing Policies and Rules and Regulations Governing P Sewer System Facilities and Service. as they may be amended from time to time by District's Board of Directors. 5) Determination of Final Total Costs Following completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities: District's acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities for ownership. operation a~_nd maintenance and provision of service purposes: and Sponsor furniF g District with its accounting report in form. content and docoment~ n satisfactory to District. pursuant to the provisions and requirements of Subparagra h A. i3) hereinabove and Subparagraph 5.D. of this Agreement. District s~all. based on Sponsor furnished and District cost accounting reports and using appropriate generally accepted cost accounting: procedures and prudent judgment and excluding S onsor and District accounting expenses relatedto the Subject Sewer Facilities. the determine Final Total Cost for eachsegment/unit of the Subject Sewer Facilities for its capital value and other accounting record purposes. 6) Determination of SDonsor's Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost Following District's determination of the Final Total Costs pursuant to Subparagraph 8.5) hereinabove. District shall. as provided for in Paragraph 8. of this Agreement. determine the amount of Sponsor's Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of each segment/unit of the Subject Sewer Facilities for its capital value and other accounting record purposes. 7) Hold Harmless District hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Sponsor harmless from any and all claims for damage or damages to property or injuries to persons 11 EXHIB. , covered by t,is Agreement that are to be performed directly Dy ~ personnel and equipment of 01strict or a contractor ~mp]oyed by Distr~ct. S~c~ ~ndem~f~cation s~a]~ include. but ,or be limited to. attorneys' fees and court costs. 12 EXHIBIT D FROI~FAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RECEIPT IX] (CREDITED) [ 1 (PAID) MEMO NO. COORD NO. SO/CO S.A. NO. 34 Eastern Municipal Water District (District) hereby acknowledges receipt of the followin~ amounts from the below named Party(ies) (Sponsor[s]): Amount of Percent of Sponsor(s) Name and Address Payment Total Payment CITY OF TEMECULA $ 34,065.00 100% covering the payment of: [ ] Nonreimbursable [X] Potentially Reimbursable [ ] Water [X] Sewer [ ] Reclaimed Water Related [ ] Basic Frontage [X] Additional Basic Frontage [ ] Special Frontage [ ] Additional Special Frontage Charges [ ] Water Main Fire Flow Capacity Frontage Surcharges, under the attached "FRONTAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RELATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS" which are relevant to the particular type of Frontage Charges/Surcharges involved (as above specified), applicable to the following described parcel(s) of [X] Sponsor [ ] other party owned land: Frontage Brief Legal Description/ L.F. of Charge/Sur- Total Parcel General Street Location/Tract Number Frontace charee/L.F. Charee Southside of Pauba Road and east of La Primavera Street. Plot alone the south Riqht-of-Way of Pauba Road beqinnine lll8 feet east of La Primavera Street and extendinq easterly 2271' 2271 $15.00 $34.065.00 / / Tot a 1 s 2271 $15.00 $34,065.00 ~STERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT By John S. Fricker, Director of New Business Date: / / Record of Reimbursements and Assiqnments (if applicable) Sponsor Current Reimbursement As s i qnment No. Date Balance / / $ / / / / / / Amount To (Spon. No.) Amount $ New Balance $ Reimbursement E1 i qi bi 1 i ty Termi nati on Date:/ / Distribution: NB / M&R: (Date) (Initial) (Date) / LIB: (Initial) (Date) / (Initial) FRONTAGE RECORDS MEMO NO. COORD NO. FROIfFAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RECEIPT SO/CO IX] (CREDITIED) [ 1 {PAID) S.A. NO. 34 .astern Municipal Water District (District) hereby acknowledges receipt of the following amounts from the below named Party(ies) (Sponsor[s]): Amount of Percent of Sponsor(s) Name and Address Payment Total Payment CITY OF TEMECULA $ 34,065.00 100% covering the payment of: iX] Nonreimbursable [ ] Potentially Reimbursable [ ] Water [X] Sewer [ ] Reclaimed Water Related [ ] Basic Frontage [ ] Additional Basic Frontage [ ] Special Frontage [ ] Additional Special Frontage Charges [ ] Water Main Fire Flow Capacity Frontage Surcharges. under the attached "FRONTAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RELATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS" which are relevant to the particular type of Frontage Charges/Surcharges involved (as above specified), applicable to the following described parcel(s) of [X] Sponsor [ ] other party owned land: Frontage Brief Legal Description/ L.F. of Charge/Sur- Total Parcel General Street Location/Tract Number Frontaqe charqe/L.F. Charqe = . Northside of Pauba Road and east of La Primavera Street. Plot alonq the north Riqht-of-Wav of Pauba Road beqinnina 1118 feet east of La Primavera Street and extendinq easterly 2271' 2271 $15.00 $34,065.00 / / Tota 1 s 2271 $15.00 $34,065.00 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISll~ICT By John S. Fricker, Director of New Business Record of Reimbursements and Assianments (if applicable) Sponsor Current ReinU>ursement Assiqnment No. Date Balance Amount To (SDon. No.) / / / / / / / / Date:__/__/__ $ ~ Amount $ New Balance $ Reimbursement Eliqibilitv Termination Date: / / ~dstribution: NB / : M&R: (Date) (Initial) (Date) / (Initial) : LIB: (Date) / (Initial) FRONTAGE FRONTAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RELATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS WATER RELATED FRONTAGE CHARGES AND SURCHARGES All nonreimbursable and potentially reimbursable Basic Water Frontage 13WF), Additional Basic Water Frontage ABWF), Special Water Frontage (SWF) and Additiom Water Frontage (ASWF) Charges and Water Main Fire Flow Capacity Frontage Surcharges (FFCF) are levied and collected by the District in accord with applicable provb,uns of District's Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Provision of Wa~r System FaciliUes and Service (Resolution No. 229, as amended, of the District's Board of Direaors). SEWER RELATED FRONTAGE CHARGES All nonreimbursable and potentially reimbursable Basic Sewer Frontage CBSF), Additional Basic Sewer Frontage (ABSF), Special Sewer Frontage (SSF) and Additional Special St'wet Frontage (ASSF) Charges ate levied and collected by the District in accord with applicable ptovisiom of District's Amended Rules and Reg~a~om Govermng the Provision of Sewer System Facilities and Service (Resolution No. 1643, as amended, of the District's Board of Dizectors). FRONTAGE CHARGES SEPARATE FROM AND IN ADDITION TO OTHER CHARGES All water and sewer related applicable (as determined by the Disaict) Frontage Clurgu ud Surc, Mrges are separate from and in addition to other applicable charges and costs, including but not limited to water service connection meter, sewer service lateral. Domestic Wa~r System Facilities Financial Participation, SeWer System and Disposal Facilities Financial Participation and Sewage Treamgnt Plant Capacity Financial Pamcipation Charges and the costs of other facilities required to provide services) for and to each revolved development. DIY!'RICT OWNERSHIP .all water and/or sewer mains dira:zly related to Frontage Charges and Surcharges shall be owned, opera~d aad ma~ained by O~e District. REIMBURSEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. All wak-'r and sewer related BWF, BSF, SV/F and SSF Charge and FFCF Surcharge Iravments shall be nonreimbursable: B. Water and sewer relszed ABWF. ABSF, ASWF and ASSF Charge navments shah be potentially reimbursable by the District under ~e following terras and conditions: (I) No interest will be credited to or paid on any potentially ~le ABW'F, ABSF, ASWF or ASSF Charge retated payment balance; (2) As and when fig owner(s) or developer(s) of a parcel of land for which potemially reimbursable ABWF, ABSF, ASWF or ASSF Clarges have been previously paid requests service from snd Um:mgh the related wa~r or sewer facilL-/, the District shall requir~ such owner(s) or developer(s) to pay appropriau: nonmmbursable BWF, BSF, Sg/F or SSF Charges pursuant to the applicable provisiom of the above-mentioned Amended Rules and (3) During the ten (10) year peric~l which follows the date of the involved FRONTAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RECEIPT, (RECEIFr) as and wt Districz collects nonreimbursable BWF, BSF, SWF or SSF Charges from the owner(s) or cleveiopff(s) of patoil(s) of land for which po~ r~knbursable A~9/F, ABSF, ASWF or ASSF Charges have been previously paid it will make reimbursement to the Spomor(s) named in the related ABWF, ABSF, ASW'F or ASSF RECEIFr (or the involved auignee[s]) in an amount equivalent to the pet front foot ~s) set forth in the involved ABWF, ABSF, ASVv'F or ASSF RECEHrlTM times the involved feet of frontage for which ~le .BWF, BSF, SWF or S,qF Fromage Charges ate so colle~___-~_ by the District pursuant to 5.B.(2) above; (4) All such reimbursements of potentially reimbursable ABWF, ABSF, ASWF or ASSF Charges slmil be made by the District to the involved individual Sponsor(s) natned in the involved RECEIPT, (or the involved assignee[s]) in the percentage(s) of each Spomor's (assignee's) percentage of the_ then outSt~mdln~e potentially reimbursable balance owing undex the involved RECEIPT; (5) AJl such reimbunemern shall be limited to ~me which ca~ be made by the District following in razipt of payment(s) of nonteimbunable BWF, BSF, SWF or SSF Charges, pursuant to 5.B.(3) above, within the zn (10) year period which begins with date of the involved RECEIPT; and (6') Thep~temia~reimbursab~ebaiancesdueaSp~m~runderaREL~EIFrshaj~bea~signab~et~an~therpany~rpanies~n~yasm~~~a or amounts then owing, unless otherwise formally appmved in ~ by Districz. Diswict shall chaage it~ records to effect such an a~signme~ respomive to its receipt and approval of a District furnished 'Reimbursable Bnlnn~e Assignment Notification and Record" form, which has been duly completed and executed by the involved Assipor and Assignee, ~ which District shall execute the confirmation portion of the "Reimbunable Balance Assignment NocifK:ation and Record' form and flwaish a copy thereof to both the involved Assignor and Assignee; and FRONTAGE CHARGE PAYMENTS PERTINENT TO TI~ DESIGNATED PARCEL(S) OF LAND All nonreimbursable and potemially t~imbursable Frontage Charge and Surcharge payments shall be pertinent to the pan:zl(s) of land designawcl in the involved RECEIPT and shall not be transferable to any other parcel(s) of laad. FRONTAGE MEMO NO. COORD NO. SEWER TREA~4ENT PLANT CAPACIT~ SO/CO FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGE RECEIPT ID NO. U-8 Eastern Municipal Water District (District) hereby acknowledges receipt of the total sum of $1,890.00 from CITY OF TEMECULA covering payment oZ Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity FInancial Participation C~arges applicable as a prerequisite part of the financial and other arrangements for the provision of sewer service for [ ] Tract or [ ] the 'FIRE STATION AT PAUBA ROAD development, within Dlstr~ct's Improvement D~str~ct No. 22 , wh~c~ Is generally shown on the map which is attached hereto. In accord with the provisions of Resolutions Nos. 1599 and 1600, both as amended, of District's Board of Directors, said $Deferred * total payment by Sponsor has been computed as follows: Sewer Treat- Type of Development 1) Single Family Ind. Residential 2) Single Family Apartment (Permanent Occupancy) - Retirement - Family - Studio/1 Bdrm 3) Motels and Hotels (Transient Occupancy) No. of DU's Charge/ /Units/ DU/Unit/ Students Student $1890.00 $ 1420.00 1890.00 1420.00 850.00 ment .Plant Capacity Fin. Part. Charge* 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Rental Type Mobile Home Parks (Permanent Occupancy) - Retirement - Family Mobile Homes on Individual Lots - Retirement - Family Recreational Vehicle Park small commercial Development All Other Commer- cial Development Schools - Elementary - Junior High - High Schools & Colleges TOTAL SEWER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGES 1 (By Special Study)' EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT By John S. FrlcKer, Dlrectok o~ Customer Service 1420.00 1890.00 1420.00 1890.00 850.00 1890.00 1890.00 96.00 120.50 144.50 Duted: $ 1890.00 / / Subject to future adjustment responsive to the provisions of Subparagraph 16.B. of the Standard Sewer Facilities and/or Service Agreement to which this Receipt is related or in the event of changes in the type of development and/or service requirements, all as determined by District. StRTPCAP SEllER SYSllEM AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGE RECEIPT. (PAID)* BASIC MEMO NO. COORD NO. SO/CO ID NO. U-8 Eastern Municipal Water District (District) hereby acknowledges receipt of the total sum of $ 1955.00 from CITY OF TEMECULA covering payment of Sewer System and Disposal Facilities Financial Participation Charges applicable as a prerequisite part of the financial and other arrangements for the provision of sewer system facilities and service for [ ] Tract or [ ] the PAUBA ROAD FIRE STATION development]within District's Improvement District No. U-8 which is generality shown on the map which is attached hereto. In accord with the provisions of Resolutions Nos. District's Board of Directors. said $1955.00 computed as follows: Type of Development No. of DU's /Units/ Students 1) Single Family Ind. Residential 1641 and 1642. both as amended. of _* total payment by Sponsor has been Sewer System Charge/ and Disposal DU/Unit/ Facilities Fin. Student Part. Charqe 1 $1955.00 $1955.00 2) Single Family Apartment (Permanent Occupancy) - Retirement - Family - Studio/1 Bdrm. 3) Motels and Hotels (Transient Occupancy 1466 O0 1955.00 1466.00 880.00 4) Rental Type Mobile Home Parks (Permanent Occupancy) - Retirement - Family 1466.00 19'55.00 5) Mobile Homes on Individual Lots Retirement 'Family 1466.00 1955.00 6) 7) Recreational Vehi cl e Park Small Commercial Development 880.00 1955.00 8) 9) All Other Commer- cial Development Schools Elementary Junior High High Schools & Colleges (By Special Study) 99.31 124.73 149.56 I SWRBAC1 TOTAL SEWER SYSTEM AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGES $ 1955.00 (a)* (a) COVERED BY: (1) SPONSOR'S PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF (2) DISTRICT'S FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION UNDER THIS AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO EXHIBIT E (3) CREDIT TO SPONSOR PURSUANT TO AGREEMENT WITH SPONSOR DATED (4) CREDIT ASSIGNED TO SPONSOR PURSUANT TO AGREEMENT WITH DATED (5) APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. PURSUANT TO: RESOLUTION NO. .. : MINUTE ORDER ; OR. AGREEMENT WITH DATED (6) APPLICABLE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. RESOLUTION NO. MINUTE ORDER OR AGREEMENT WITH , DATED PURSUANT TO: ., OR TOTAL COMBINED AMOUNT OF PAYMENT AND CREDITS $ 1955.00 NOTE: SEE THE AI'FACHED "CREDIT DESCRIPTION/COMPUTATION" EXHIBIT FOR FURTHER CREDIT RELATED DETAILS EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT By Date:__/__/__ ** John S. Fri cker, Di rector of New Busi ness Subject to future adjustment responsive to the provisions of Subparagraph 16.B. of the Standard Sewer Facilities and/or ServiceAgreement to which this Receipt is related or in the event of changes in the type of development and/or service requirements, all as determined by District. APPLICABLE FOR THE SCHEDULE OF CHARGES SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT A AI'FACHED TO RESOLUTION NO. 1642.12 ONLY 2 SWRBAC1 BILL OF For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CITY OF TEMECULA -FIRE STATION (PAUBA ROAD) (Seller), hereby bargains, conveys, and grants unto the Eastern Municipal Water District (District), a public agency of the State of California, the'following described personal property, such conveyance to become effective upon completion of.the construction/installation by Seller's Contractor(s) and acceptance by the District of such personal property, which is more specifically described as: The Subject Sewer Facilities which are to be. furnished and constructed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) as described and provided for in that certain'Agreement, by and between Sponsor (Seller in this Bill of Sale) and District, dated , to which this Bill of Sale is attached as Exhibit F. Seller hereby warrants that the above-described personal property is free and clear of any and all encumbrances. In this regard Seller hereby agrees to protect and defend (District's) right to own, operate, maintain and provide services through all the personal property hereby transferred to District's ownership wherein the defense of the District's right to own, operate, maintain and provide services as provided hereinabove results from any person or entity's alleged rights to any of the personal property described hereinabove or for any monetary damages resulting from the nonpayment by Seller of any person or entity having the right to file a lien against said personal property. Seller further agrees to indemnify the District for any and all losses which may be occasioned or suffered by the District as a result of any claims by others as to clear title of the personal property covered hereby. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19_. Notary Public in and for the State of California Expiration Date (Type name and Title) By (Signature) (Type Name and Title) (Mailing Address) Date EXHIBIT F ITEM 22 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRE .T CITY MANAG~ City Council/City Manager ; ~,r.,Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer February 13, 1996 Award of Contract for the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project, Project No. PW95-06 PREPARED BY: /i~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for the construction of the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project, Project No. PW95-06 to Clovis Paving & Sealing, Inc, for $653,929.15and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $65,392.92 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On November 14, 1995 City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project, Project No. PW95-06. The project plans and specifications are proposing two (2) types of pavement rehabilitation which include and asphalt overlay with a stress relief membrane (geotextile fabric), and the removal & reconstruction of the existing asphalt pavement. There are fifteen (15) roadway segments to be rehabiiitated, four (4) are arterial, which includes potions of Margarita Road, Pala Road, Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, and eleven (11 ) are secondary/local residential streets at various location throughout the City. This is the city's first Annual Pavement Management Project. Each year the city receives Measure A funds to improve the quality of the City roadways. This project was separated into the base bid and three alternates to maximize the amount of work proposed for each street section with the available funds allocated to this year's project. The base bid included the major streets, which are Margarita Road, Rancho California, Pala Road and portions of Ynez Road. Alternative 1 will complete the remaining portion of Ynez Road (just north and south of Pauba Road). Alternative 2 includes the minor streets, which are Pauba Road, Commerce Center, and Las Haciendas. Alternative 3 includes all of the residential streets for this years project. The engineer's estimate for the base bid is $620,00. pwO4~agdt~t\96\0213 \pw95-06 .awd Ten (10) bids for the project were publicly opened on January 25, 1996 and the results for the base bid are as follows: No. CONTRACTOR BASE BID ALT. I ALT. 2 ALT. 3 ($) ($) ($) ($) I Clovis Paving & Sealing, 493,601.05 91,192.65 69,135.45 55,301.10 Inc. 2 Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. 536,399.90 104,728.20 74,079.60 66,092.50 3 R.J. Noble Company 541,623.80 101,868.70 71,421.20 57,094.10 4 Industrial Asphalt 559,167.25 108,483.25 73,275.70 71,336.50 5 Highgrade Engineering, 571,388.53 98,857.38 77,098.19 69,498.33 Inc. 6 All American Asphalt 583,142.00 105,152.00 74,219.25 61,980.50 7 Laird Construction Co., Inc. 589,529.60 106,932.30 74,485.85 66,167.50 8 Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. 606,698.20 114,238.50 94,079.25 74,465.00 9 Matich Corporation 622,600.00 118,000.00 82,099.50 80,900.00 10 Silvia Construction, Inc. 678,407.90 138,489.10 80,381.20 80,636.50 Staff recommends the awarding of the base bid, alternative 1, and alternative 2, with the remaining streets to be included in next fiscal years program. Clovis Paving & Sealing, Inc., has not performed any work for the City, but has preformed well in other areas of California based on comments from references of previous work. The construction schedule is for 115 working days. Work is expected to begin mid-March, 1996 and be completed in August, 1996. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by Measure A. Funds are available for the construction contact and contingency amounts of $653,929.15 and $65,392.92, respectively in Account No. 210-165-655-5804. Attachment Contract pwO4\agdrpt\96\02 13\pw95-06 .awd FY94-95 STREETS CITY OF TEMECULA PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW95-06 FY94/95 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM THIS CONTRACT, made and entered 'into the 13th day of February, 1996, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Clovis Paving & Sealing, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95- 06 FY94195 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO, PW95-06 FY94/95 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will C0ntrQI the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW95- 06 FY94/95 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects\pw95-06\contract.doc e e The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW95-06 FY94/95 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTORagrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Six hundred ;;;hf-three thousand nine hundred twenty-nine DOLLARS and 15 CENTS ($653,929.15),the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN (115)working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: Ae Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cil~\projects\pw95-06\contract.doc made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Ca Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance Of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000-$75,000 $75,000-$500,000 Over $500,000 RETENTION PERIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RETENTION PERCENTAGE 3% $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. 6 WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 10. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate. of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects\pw95-O6\contract.doc 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, Or death of persons (CONTRACTOR'semployees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw95-O6\contract.doc times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 18. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 19. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Clovis Paving & Sealing, Inc. 4543 N. Hayes Fresno, CA 93722 (209) 275-7909 By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Karel, F. Lindemans, Mayor CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects\pw95-O6\contract.doc APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip\projects\pw95oO6\contract.doc ITEM 23 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager .f/J0seph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Completion and Acceptance of the Construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-21 PREPARED BY: ~Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-21. File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: The City Council awarded a contract for the construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-21, to West Coast Construction for $38,951.00 This project included concrete sidewalk repairs, removal and replacement of curb and gutter, removal and replacement of concrete cross gutters, removal and replacement of catch basin lids, and repair of under sidewalk drains. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. -1- r:-~agdsp696XO213~m95-21 .mm~dm~ FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was $38,951.00. The original bid cost of the project was decreased due to a change in the actual field quantities by $3,894.65, bringing the total contract cost to $35,056.35. This project is a Public Works Annual Maintenance Project and is being funded from Account No. 100-164-601-5402, Routine Street Maintenance. ATTACHMENTS: Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit ITEM 24 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 13, 1996 Proposed Detour for Winchester Road Construction - Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road (Area 1) PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommendation to request approval from Caltrans the proposed detour plan (Alternative #2), to facilitate the safe and timely construction of Winchester Road (Area 1 ). BACKGROUND: Due to the recent funding arrangements secured for the ultimate construction of Winchester Road (Area 1 ), staff has initiated an investigation to modify the current 18 month construction time line, and reduce overall costs to meet current funding. Riverside County, Administrators of Assessment District 1 61, has taken on the task of facilitating project development focussing on meeting three primary goals. Construct Winchester Road to a six (6) lane conventional highway standard between the existing improvements at Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. This will close the gap between existing improvements. To substantially complete the construction prior to the opening of the new Chaparral High School at Nicolas Road on July, 1997. To reduce total project costs in order to meet the current funds committed for the project· The County has completed its analysis of three alternatives, which are summarized in the attached Public/Traffic Safety Commission agenda report and shown on Exhibits "A" through -1- r:Xagdtpt\96\O213\winclose.agn/ajp This issue has been presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission on January 25, 1996 (see attached report). In addition to the proposed improvements recommended by the County, staff placed two (2) additional requirements on Alternative #2, in order to encourage the support of the Commission. These requirements included a traffic signal along the proposed detour route, and the creation of a temporary by-pass road over the property on the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. The additional traffic signal will be needed on Margarita Road at Rustic Glen due to increased traffic volumes. The temporary by-pass road would be created to avoid detouring local traffic through Roripaugh Hills for a three (3) week period. This would apply to all alternatives while the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road is being re-constructed. At the conclusion of staff's presentation summarizing the three alternatives, this item was open for public comments. A representative for the property owner on the corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road stated that his client has not been notified by anyone regarding the possible use of his land and felt current development plans may interfere with construction of a by-pass road. The owner of the gas station/food mart located on the corner of Winchester Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road also spoke in concern for the recommended Alternative #2. He felt that it was imperative to his business that some kind of access be provided throughout this project. He also mentioned that he was happy with the previous project construction management which accommodated his business. The Director of Facilities Development with the Temecula Valley Unified School District, was in favor of any alternative to complete this construction prior to the opening of Chaparral High School (letter attached). He felt that the combination of parents, students and construction traffic would create major safety concerns. Staff has received numerous pleas by the residents of Roripaugh Hills adamantly opposed to any detour through their development, even for only three weeks of the 13 to 18 month construction period. Staff also received a copy of a fax from the City of Murrieta, 'Director of Public Works/City Engineer, to an official of Caltrans, in opposition of detouring the project traffic onto Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Their concern was that vehicles detouring would soon find it easier to use the interchanges at I-15 and 1-215 instead of using Margarita Road to get back into Temecula. This fax is. attached for your review. A representative from the County of Riverside stated that they will start immediately to negotiate with the property owner on the corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. They felt that because of the short duration of the detour and its timing (September, 1996) that they could reach an agreement. They also stated that they will continue to work with the owner of the gas station/food mart to allow access to his business. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission agreed to support staff's recommendation for Alternative #2 with the caveat that the effected businesses and property owners be accommodated, that emergency vehicle response times be reviewed, and school bus routing be evaluated. -2- r:Xagdrpt\96\02 13\winglose .agn/ajp The Commission felt that the four (4) items listed below must be included in the proposed Alternative #2 for the City's request to Caltrans. 1. Signalization of the Margarita Road/Rustic Glen Drive intersection Creation of a temporary by-pass road near the intersection of Nicolas Road/Winchester Road. This would be based on successful negotiations with underlying property owner and last approximatelythree '(3) weeks. Analysis of impacts to emergency vehicle response times during the 13 month construction schedule. Efforts made to ensure continued access of traffic to the existing businesses along the detoured section. Benefits of Alternative #2 as proposed included; Decreasing construction time by approximately five (5) months (to substantially complete construction by the opening of the Chaparral High School), reduce costs by building bridge in one (1) phase, and increase safety by reducing the number of vehicles traveling through the construction zone. Staff recommends that the City Council request that Caltrans consider detouring traffic from State Route 79(N), Winchester Road, to Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Margarita Road to facilitate the safe and timely construction of Winchester Road - Area 1. FISCAL IMPACT: Table "A" Cost Summary ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Exhibits "A" through "C" - Project Alternatives Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report - January 25, 1996 Letter of support from Temecula Valley Unified School District Fax from City of Murrieta to Caltrans County of Riverside Correspondence - January 17, 1996 Engineers Estimate comparing Alternative 81, and Alternative #2 · -3d r:~agdrpt\96\O213\winciose.agn/njp .:""'~'%,.~..'\,,~'BY CALTRANS '~ RUSTIC GLEN DRIVE , \, '\ ,/ ·// .,.,~.~ ')<' / ... ~ ,. '~ -xs ~ / / / \\ HiRh School I.///,V SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK .% l ---____,:'i~>~M~[TH CONSTRUCTION ZONE y ,/ ;IGNALS',,, ~ ,,, ORTH ',\ Open to' ~~ Local Traffic ,'\ SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK .% Hi:~h School TEMPORARY BYPASS ROAD 3 weeks) Open to Local Traffic · :" , , "':T,"\, ,(' ' :~,/-'>-" ",, ",,/ , '\ ",, RUSTIC GLEN DRIVE ~ ~,, ,/,,/ /,A~\ / II NORTH Hiffh School m, ,ss TE]VIPORARY :' ~ =': BOX CULVERTS ;ANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK II ' -I "" ALTERNATIVE ,,';~':" --'/"~-, 13 MONTH CONSTRUCTION ZONE AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer DATE: January 25, 1996 SUBJECT: Item 2 Proposed Detour for Winchester Road Construction - Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road (Area 1) RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to the City Council a detour plan alternative that well best facilitate the construction of Winchester Road (Area 1). BACKGROUND: Winchester Road construction plans were approved by Caltrans with Santa Gertrudis Bridge phased construction to allow continuous traffic along Winchester Road. Because of limited funding, safety concerns and project timing, a local engineering firm has investigated methods to reduce impacts of construction which include (a) construction of the bridge as one unit, and diverting traffic to Margarita Road and to Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and (b) an alternative detour route across the Santa Gertrudis Channel using temporary culverts. Consideration has been given to scheduling the construction of Winchester Road for timely access to the new Chaparral High School. All alternatives will require that the intersection of Nicolas Road be closed to local traffic for a three week period, which will necessitate routing local traffic through Roripaugh Hills, while the intersection of Nicolas Road is being reconstructed. ALTERNATIVE 1 is the approved plan to phase the construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, and to phase roadway construction, keeping Winchester Road open to through traffic. The advantage of this alternative is that the improvement plans are already approved by Caltrans. The disadvantages of this alternative are: the added cost of construction due to phasing of the bridge and roadway; the increased hazard of back and forth construction traffic detouring along the roadway; the increased traffic hazard due ~o the deactivation of the traffic signal at Nicolas Road, with continued through traffic on Winchester Road; and the additional time of construction due to phased construction. Estimated time of construction using Alternative 1 is eighteen (18) months. Estimated cost of the bridge for Alternative 1 is $1,445,350, and for the detour is $261,935. ALTERNATIVE 2 would detour through traffic to Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road, which would mean no phased construction of the bridge, and minimal phasing of the roadway. Winchester Road would be open for local traffic to Nicolas Road for all but the three (3) week period, when the intersection was reconstructed. It is reasonable to expect that through traffic will avoid Margarita Road after one or two experiences, and will quickly learn to use Murrieta Hot Springs Road to directly access the freeway. The advantages of Alternative 2 are: cost savings of unphased construction of the bridge and roadway; reduced traffic hazards due to phased construction and of the deactivated Nicolas Road traffic signal; reduced traffic through the construction area due to the Margarita Road detour, and direct use of Murrieta Hot Springs access to the freeway; and reduced construction time. The disadvantages of this alternative are: through traffic will be required to adjust to the detour r. \traffic~,ommmn~age~da%~\ 125/ajp route; and the increased traffic along Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Estimated construction time for Alternative 2 is 13 months. The cost of the bridge is estimated at $1,084,013, and the cost of the detour is $186,815. The signalization of the Margarita Road/Murrieta Hot Springs Road intersection will be constructed with County Traffic Signal Mitigation Funds. ALTERNATIVE 3 would detour through traffic around the bridge over a temporary culvert crossing of the Santa Genrudis Creek, which would mean no phased construction of the bridge. The advantages of this alternative would be reduction of the bridge construction time. Disadvantages are: (a) cost of the detour itself would eliminate any savings of nonphased bridge construction; (b) the culvert crossing could not convey large storm flows (which might cause rex, onstruction of the temporary crossing); and (c) increased traffic hazard due to phased construction, the temporary culvert crossing, and deactivation of the Nicolas Road signal with full through traffic on Winchester Road. Estimated time of construction would be reduced to thirteen months due to nonphased bridge construction. Cost of the bridge for Alternative 3 is $1,084,013, and cost of the detour is $523,935. The City of Temecula, Department of Public Works has reviewed all alternatives and feels that Alternative 2 will have more benefits than disadvantages if local traffic concerns are mitigated. Table "A' summarizes the varying duration, costs, and safety associated with each alternative. Due to the increase in traffic on Margarita Road, the intersection of Rustic Glen Drive is foretasted to deteriorate below acceptable levels of service. This location currently meets traffic signal warrants even though it is at the bottom of the Cities Traffic Signal Priority List. Signalization of this intersection would ensure safe and efficient operation soon after implementation of the proposed detour. Even though the complete closure of the intersection of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road is a necessity, the use of Roripaugh Road as a detour path raises residential safety concerns. The ADT on Nicolas Road just east of Winchester Road is 6,951 vehicles, per counts taken in 1995 (Please note that Roripaugh Ranch has since been developed and occupied, therefore the volumes have probably increased since 1995). Also, the existing ADTs on Roripaugh Road are 793 and 2,215 vehicles just south of Nicolas Road and just east of Winchester Road, respectively. Therefore, Roripaugh Road will experience an ADT in excess of 9,959 vehicles (6,951 + 793 + 2,215) for three weeks due to the proposed closure. Roripaugh Road is a two lane paved residential collector and 20 residential lots directly access it. It is highly recommended that the Commission consider a requirement to pave a temporary bypass road on the vacant parcel on the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. Staff recommends support for Alternative 2, the Margarita Road/Murrieta Hot Springs detour, with the following conditions: That along with the signalization on Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Marrgarita Road that the County signalize the intersection of Margarita Road at Rustic Glen Drive. That the temporary bypass road be created on the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road to eliminate the three week detour through Roripaugh Hills. FISCAL IMPACT: Table "A" - Cost Summary Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Traffic Volumes in Temecula r: \trnf~c\commissnXag endn\96\ 125/ajp TABLE "A" Typical hazards associated with high speed traffic through construction zones PROJECT SAFETY Increased safety with signalization of Margarita Road at Murrieta Hot Springs and Rustic Glen Drive intersections Typical hazards associated with high speed traffic through construction zones CONSTRUCTION DURATION Approximately 18 months Approximately 13 months with substantial completion prior to high school opening Approximately 13 months with substantial completion prior to high school opening PROJECT COSTS $ 4,745,790 $ 4,745,790 $ 4,745,790 Bridge Costs 1,445,350 1,084,013 1,084,013 Traffic. Handling 261.935 186.815 523.935 Total Savings $ 6,453,075 $ 6,016,618 $ 6,353,738 (436,457*) (99,337) Savings does not account for $125,000 needed for additional signal on Margarita Road and Rustic Glen and construction of recommended bypass road. NOTE: A complete closure of the intersection of Winchester and Nicolas roads, is proposed with all alternatives for three weeks with detouring to Roripaugh Road. R:\TRAFFIC'XCOMMI?~SNXAGENDA\96\0125\TABLE.A-rh Average Daily Traffic Rustic Glen Dr. CROSS CRE:E.J( GOLD(H ROD CT uOONUC.'a CT P,t~t,U, VLY 6,951 793 SS ROAD Nicolas Road I WARBL.~R TUQLOuNE~ ATIJOR~ 2,215 TRAI;I;IC VOLUNIES WrlItlN TEMECULA EXHIBIT "A" January 7.5, 1996 TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District SUPERINTENDENT Pathc~a B. Novotney. Ed.D. BOARD OF EDUCATION BarOara Tooker Richard Shafer Linda CareDDell Patti Smah Rosae Vanderhaak Public/Traffic Safety Commission City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Pre-July 1997 Winchester Road Completion Schedule Endorsement Request Dear Commissioners: At tonight's Traffic Safety Commission Meeting, you will be considering various scenarios for the upcoming construction of the six lane Winchester Road improvements from Margarita Road to beyond the Santa Gertrudis bridge, including a City staff recommendation that enables construction completion prior to the July 1997 opening of the new Chaparrai High School. The Temecula Valley Unified School District CI'VUSD) urges the Commission to endorse the recommendation that enables construction completion prior to the July 1997 school opening. Considering the complex na:-'re ,:t' high school-related and concurrent non-high school-related traffic flows near an active high school campus, the completion of construction prior to the initial opening of the high school is by far the safest alternative for the commumty. Fer the past three years, TVUSD has urged completion of road construction in front of Chaparral High School prior to the July 1997 operarig, to maximize the safety of high school-related and concurrent non-high school- relat~,l *-raffic near the school property. TVUSD's efforts to ensure such timely completion have included up front payment of school property assessments for the road construction funding, plus a commitment to grant all necessary school property rights-of-way free of charge in remm for a pre-July 1997 completion schedule commitment. We urge each Commission member to endorse the City staff recommendation which enables construction completion prior to the July 1997 school opening, thereby rnaximizing traffic safety for the community. Sincerely, T~~~~LLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Dave Gallaher Director of Facilities Development DG:ch CC: Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent Board of Education 31350 Rancho Vista Road /Temecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661 _January 19, 199~ 7:lSam -- Page 2. JAN 1'9 '_c6 i98:3'7~tI CITY ~ ~I~A ?.Z CITY O[ MITRRIErA TO: FROM: DATZ: S~: Ben N. ]VEnandde, Director of Public Worb/City Engineer January 18, 1996 ROUT2 79 (WINC~F-_~TER ROAD); MITRRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD TO MARGiA ROAD; PROPOSED TOTAL (IDSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION; TRAFFIC I1v~PACT ON 1-215 AT )f0XRIErA HOT SPRINGS ROAD INYERCtANGE IN MURRI~TA We believe the total closure for a one (1) year peziod of the subject selpr, ent of l~u~ 79 for construction pur~__~__ (currant ADT 5,000) and the mzouang of mi,~ traffic along Y_acdm Hot Springs Ro~i to Margazita Road, snd then along Kirgari~ Road m Route 79 will resuk in adverse ~_~ traffic congestion at th: 1-115 at Mm Hot .S1xSo~s Road in~chang~. Motorists umg this d~ur will soon recogn~ thai by coafinuing w wav~l ~,st~fly along Mm H~t S~ngs ~ and not taming ~outhe~ly on ~ ~ can mote ea~!y ~zin acc,~ss to the 1-215 and 1-15 fr~ways by using th~ Murrk~a Hot spmgs Road intm'change than by u~dng the ~ R~ati d~our. As you know, the 1-215 at M~ H~ Spmgs Road inmmha~ge w'ich the current 'all. way" st~p si~ ramp controh is at LOS 'F' dttring Ink periods. While the ,~igrtsti~tion project of the existing geometries now under eon.ltmc~on will help, tra~e congolion at ~ rulerchange will be a problem unti/~he ultimam geometric improvements are made. We can see no benefit t~ Murriela from this proposed chnaur. Rstlzr a defmim traffic detriment will be the result. This demur scheme is not justiriS, from our point of view, to minimize the congestion conditions at our intgrchan~e at 1-215. Please call me if you need additional c/arificarion of our objections. cc: Joe Kicak COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANA CEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department David E. Barnhart Director of Transportation January 17, 1996 City of Temecula Department of Public Works 432 174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: Mr. Joe Kicak, City Engineer Subject: Detour For Winchester Road (Area I) Construction DearJoe: Per your request, and in reference to the letter of December 6, 1995 (attached), the attached preliminary construction schedules for the above referenced project are provided for your use in your presentation at the upcoming City of Temecula Traffic & Safety Commission meeting on January 25, 1996. These schedules show the duration of construction based on the following two (2) scenarios: Scenario 1) A proposed traffic detour on Margarita Road, as discussed at a meeting held on September 11, 1995 artended by Jeff Stone, Ron Bradley & yourself of the City and Bob Buster, Kay Ceniceros, Crregg Marrama and 'Kelley Donevan of the County. This schedule shows that the consreaction of Winchester Road (Area I) could be substantially completed in conjunction with the opening of Chaparral High School during the summer of 1997. Scenario 2) Staged construction which allows thru traffic to remain on the highway throughout the duration of construction. This schedule shows a construction duration of approximately 18 months, with a date of completion during the late fall/early winter of 1997. Safety to the travelling public, duration of construction and project cost are the three (3) basic considerations for utilizing the Scenario 1 detour, which will eliminate thru traffic within the Winchester Road (Area I) consreaction area. Caltrans and the County have recently completed highway widening improvements along Winchester Road between Winchester Creek Road and Hunter/Borel Road. This highway improvement was done while moving thin traffic along the construction area. During the construction period six (6) known traffic accidents and one (1) fatality occurred within the construction area. These accidents occurred in spite of the best efforts of the contractor, Caltrans and the County to provide well marked and clear traffic controls for traffic during the construction period. 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor · Riverside, California 92501 · (909) 275-6740 P.O. Box 1090 · Riverside, California 92502-1090 · FAX (909) 275-6721 As you know, the new Chaparral High School is scheduled to open on July 1, 1997. For safety reasons, every effort should be made by all concerned to insure that the highway improvements are substantially complete on or before this date. The Scenario 1 preliminary construction schedule, which utilizes the Margarita Road detour, sets milestones which will allow the project to be substantially completed by July 1, 1997. This timeframe can be met only if thru traffic is eliminated within the construction area, allowing for the bridge to be constructed continuously and sequentially, instead of in phases. Clearly, if the requirement to switch thru traffic from one side of the highway to the other during bridge consauction is no longer necessary, an obvious source of potential traffic accidents could be avoided. Additionally, since only local traffic will pass through the consauction site to Nicolas Road under Scenario 1, the travelling public will consist almost exclusively of repetitive and knowledgeable users which should enhance traffic safety. As you know, the costs associated with the STP Federal Grant application, submitted by the City to the Riverside County Traffic Commission (RCTC), were predicated on utilizing the proposed detour on Margarita Road, as described in Scenario 1 above. This issue was discussed in the September 11, 1995 meeting. The STP Federal Grant required the project to be cleared environmentally in accordance with National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) standards, which would have required at least one (1) year of processing time. Working toward our common goal of substantially completing the highway improvements prior to the opening of the new Chaparral High School, the County successfully negotiated with RCTC to exchange the STP Federal dollars with available local money. This avoided significant project delays associated with the NEPA environmental process. Attached is the Summary of the Engineer's Cost Estimate dated December 1, 1995. As you can see, utilizing the Margarita Road Detour in Scenario 1 will produce an estimated savings of $436,000 over Scenario 2. Most of this cost saving is attributable to eliminating the need to construct the bridge in two (2) separate phases. The remainder is attributable to the need for less temporary consauction traffic control implementation. A consauction funding deficit will be realized ff the decision is made not to proceed with the Scenario 1 detour. We will be happy to assist you with your upcoming presentation to the City of Temecula Traffic & Safety Commission regarding this issue. The success of this project requires all parties to continue to work together in a spirit of cooperation and goodwill. Please contact me at (909) 275-6740 if you have any questions, or require additional information. Director of Transportation DEB:dkd 2 XC: file: Bob Buster, 1st District Supervisor John Tavaglione, 2nd District Supervisor Kay Ceniceros, 3rd Diswict Supervisor Roy Wilson, 4th District Supervisor Tom Mullen, 5th Disn'ict Supervisor Larry Parfish, A.O. Richard Lashbrook, TLMA Gregg Marrama, A.O. George Johnson, RCTD .. Kelley Donovan, RCTD Greg Aguilar, TPC Patricia Novomey, TVUSD Dave Gallaher, TVUSD Roger Prend, Webb Ursula Hyman, Latham & Watkins Frank Lehr, Caltrans file Winchester I Detour/Temecula COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY ~ ~"~ Transportation Department v~ ~. B~. Director of Transportation December 6, 1995 City of Temecula Department of Public Works 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Joe Kicak, City Engineer Subject: Dear Joe: Detour Alternatives for Winchester Road Area I Construction Enclosed, for your review and' consideration, .are Alternatives Analysis with exhibits of the following three alternative detours during construction of Winchester Road (between Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road): Alternative 1 detour along the Winchester Road Area I construction using phased bridge and roadway construction Alternative 2 - detour closing the Winchester Road Area I construction to all but local traffic and diverting through traffic to Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road Alternative 3 detour along the Winchester Road Area I construction which will detour traffic over a temporary culvert crossing of the Santa Gertrudis Creek, and phase roadway construction only Kelley Donovan Senior Civil Engineer Steve Crew, swell, COT Many Lauber, COT Greg Aguilar, TPC Dave Hupp, TPC Joe Perez, TPC File: 235-91-31 & 135-30 Chron 4080 Lemon Street, 8th FlooreRiverside, California 92501*(909) 275-6740 P. O. Box 1090,Riverside, California 92502-1090,FAX (909) 275-6721 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS December 6, 1995 TOPIC: Detour for Winchester Road Construction between Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Spring Road BACKGROUND: Winchester Road construction plans were approved with Santa Gertrudis Bridge phased construction to allow continuous traffic along Winchester Road. Because of limited funding, TPC has investigated methods to reduce the cost of construction which include (a) construction of the bridge as one unit, and diverting traffic to Margarita Road and to Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and (b) an alternative detour route across the Santa Gertrudis Channel using temporary culverts. Consideration has -been given to scheduling the construction of Winchester Road for timely access to the new Chaparral High School. All alternatives will require that the intersection of Nicolas Road be closed to local traffic for a three week period, which will necessitate routing local traffic through Roripaugh Hill~, while the intersection of Nicolas Road is being reconstructed. DISCUSSION: Alternative 1 (Exhibit 1) is the approved plan to phase the construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, and to phase roadway construction, keeping Winchester Road open to through traffic. The advantage of this alternative is that the improvement plans are already approved by Caltrans. The disadvantages of this alternative are: the added cost of construction due to phasing of the bridge and roadway; the increased hazard of back and forth construction traffic detouring along the roadway; the increased traffic hazard due to the aleactivation of the traffic signal at Nicolas Road, with continued through traffic on Winchester Road; and the additional time of construction due to phased construction. Estimated time of construction using Alternative 1 is 14 months. Estimated cost of the bridge for Alternative 1 is $1,445,000, and for the detour is $187,000. Alternative 2 (Exhibit 2) would detour through traffic to Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road, which would mean no phased construction of the bridge, and minimal phasing of the roadway. Winchester Road would be open for local traffic to Nicolas Road for all but the three week period, when the intersection was reconstructed. It is reasonable to expect that through traffic will avoid Margarita Road after one or two experiences, and will quickly learn to use Murrieta Hot Springs Road to directly access the freeway. The advantages of Alternative 2 are: cost savings of unphased construction of the bridge and roadway; reduced traffic hazards due to phased construction and of the deactivated Nicolas Road traffic signal; reduced traffic through the construction area due to the Margarita Road detour, and direct use. of Murrieta Hot Springs access to the freeway; and reduced construction time. The disadvantages of this alternative are: through traffic will be required to adjust to the detour route; and the increased traffic along Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Estimated construction time for Alternative 2 is 13 months. The cost of the bridge is estimated at $1,250,000, and the cost of the detour is negligible..The signalization of the Margarita RoadAVlurrieta Hot Springs Road intersection will be constructed with Traffic Signal Mitigation Funds. Alternative 3 (Exhibit 3) would detour thrqugh traffic around the bridge over a temporary culvert crossing of the Santa Gertrudis Creek, which would mean no phased construction of the bridge. The advantages of this alternative would be reduction of the bridge construction time. Disadvantages are: (a) cost of the detour itself would eliminate any savings of nonphased bridge construction; (b) the culvert crossing could not convey large storm flows (which might came reconstruction of the temporary crossing); and (c) increased traffic hazard due to phased construction, the temporary culvert crossing, and deactivation of the Nicolas Road signal with full -through traffic on Winchester Road. Estimated time of construction would be reduced to thirteen months due to nonphased bridge construction. Cost of the bridge for Alternative 3 is $1,250,000, and cost of the detour is $262,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that detour Alternative 2 (which would dose Winchester Road to through traffic) be used for the construction of Winchester Road due to cost, time and safety advantages. Ijm\wpadXcitytem.cor L M N STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - WIN~TER ROAD (FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF3'rER CIH~-~K RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RI)L INTERSECTIONS . PROJECT CONSTRUCTION B. GRADING C. STREET IlvfPROVEMENTS D. STORM DRAIN ITEMS E. TEMP. CONST. TRAFFIC CONTROL * TEMP. RAMPPAVEML~.rF F. WATER l~l=:r .OCATION G. SEWER Rgrt-OCATIONS H. BACKBONE AND UTILITY TRENCH I. SIGNAL INTERCONNECT J. EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING BORROW SITE FINAL STRIPING AND SIGNING BKIDGE CONSTRUCTION "I ,F_~,S 9_5% OF BRIDGE COST (ALT. DETOUR) CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION SIGNALIZATION TOTAL SAVINGS NOTE: AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - AREA1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DECEM2BER 1, 1995 SUMMARY ORIGINAL PHASING TOTAL $250,000.00 '$872,79150 $2302,819.20 $378,979.96 $186,81450 $75,11950 $281,408.00 $15,800.00 ' $25,125.00 $149,775.00 $57,815.00 ALTERNATIVE .DETOUR TOTAL $250,000.00 $872,79150 $2,3o2,8D.2o $378,979.96 $186,81450 $0.00 $281,408.00 $15,800.00 $25,125.00 $149,775.00 $57,815.00 $43,056~10 $1,445~350.00 $0.00 $168,220.80 $200,000.00 $6,453,074.56 ~3,056.10 $1,445,350.00 ($361,337.00) $168,220.80 $200,000.00 $6,016,618.06 $436,456.50 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION FROM RORIPAUGH HILLS MAY INCLUDE LANDSCAPING REPLACEMENT COST. SMD COST SMD COST Pag 1 of 11 ljm~r79stg4.wk106-Dec-95 STATE HIGPIWAY 79 NORTH - WINCHESTER ROAD (FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF~TER CREEK RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGI{, NICOLAS RD. INFERSECTIONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - AREA1 ENGINEER'S F,,TIIMATE DECEMBER 1, 1995 A~ PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST FIELD OFFICE FOR AGENCY PERSONNEL CRITICAL PATH PROGRESS SQ4KDULING MOBILIZATION N'PDES 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000.00 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $250,000.00 B- GRADING ITEM NO. DESCRIFHON QUAN'ITYY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 CLEARING AND GRUBBING WATERING (INCL. DEV. WATER SUPPLY) ROADWAY EXCAVATION EXCAVATION SLOPES IMPORT OVEREX AND RECOMPACT FINISHING ROADWAY PROTECT EXIST. SIGN STRUCTURE RESTORE LANDSCAPING AND ELECYRICAL APPURTENANCE EX2IST. POWER POLES, PROTECT IN PLACE 10 AC $800.00 $8,000.00 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 55,400 CY $1/5 $69250.00 49~234 CY $1/5 $61~54250 112,790 CY $4.00 $451,160.00 6,868 CY $4.00 $27,472.00 195367 CY Sl.00 $195,367.00 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 TOTAL $872,79150 C. STREET IMPROVEMENTS ITEM NO. DESCKIFFION QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 AC PAVEMENT (INCL. MFDIAN AND TEMP. DETOUR RAMPS) ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (15H AGGKEGATE BASE CLASS II (INCL. TEMP. DETOUR RAMPS) SELECT SUBGRADE (12'T) ASPHALTIC EMULSION CtNCL. TEMP. DETOUR RAMPS) CURB & GLrITER TYPE A2-8 PER CALTRANS STD. A-88 CURB & G~R TYPE A2- 6 PER CALTRANS STD. A-87 CURB TYPE A1-8 PER CALTRANS STD. A-87 25,821 TON $2550 $658,43550 7,500 TON $45.00 $337,500.00 38;.37 CY $15.00 $573,555.00 32;270 CY $10.00 $322,700.00 73 TON $320.00 $23,360.00 11,630 LF $6.00 $69,780.00 833 LF $550 $4,58150 221 LF $7.00 $1,547.00 t Page 2 of 11 ljmNsr79stg4.wk106 - Dec- 1TEM NO. STATE HIGI-FWAY 7~ NORTH - WINCHESTER ROAD (FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHES'I"ER CREEK RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECHONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - AREA1 ENGINI~-F-R'S ESTIM TE DECEMBER 1, 1995 STREET IMPR OVE1V[ENTS (CONT0 DESCRIYIION QUANTITY CURB TYPE ~-6 0vr~L~D PER CALTRANS STD. A-87 '-'. 13,961 24 CURB &GUTTER TRANSITION (8" TO 6" CF) 207 25 CURB TRANSITION (8'TO6'CF) 220 26 6" TEMP A.C. BERM 1,155 27 6" THZK. PCC SIDEWALK 853 28 WHl~.l~l. CHAIR RAMP CASE-A PER CALTRANS STD. A-88 INCLUDING CURB RETURN SWK WItEEL CHAIRRAMPCASE -E PER CALTRANS STD. A-88 INCLUDING CURB REIlTRN SWK 15'W - D RIVEWAY PER CALTRANS STD. A-87 30'W-DRIVEWAY PER CALTRANS STD. A-87 CROSS GUTTER & SPANDREL CacrD S'rD. 209 & 209A) CURB & GTo~'I"ER DEPRESSION PER C~LTRANS 0>78) KEMOVE & GRIND EXIST. AC (KECYCLE AS SELECT SUBBASE) KEMOVE EXIST. BERM & C&G KEMOVE .EXISTING MISC. PIPES INCL. S.D. & ABANDONED IRRIG. PIPES KEMOVE AND REPLACE EXIST. STt~F-17I' CL MONUMENT REMOVE EXIST. GUARD RAIL/BARRICADE REMOVE EXIST. STREET LIGHT REMOVE EXISTING SIGN REMOVE EXIST.-CATCH BASIN/INLET CONCRETE DITCH 2'(W) X r0>) CONC~='rE DrrCH 3'(w) x 1'0>) CONCKETE DITCH 4'Cw) x 1.5'0>) TYPE 1A RETAINING WAT .l . PER CALTRANS STD. B3-3 CUT OFF WAI .T . @ RIPRAP/BROW DITCH TRANS. 0>ET. D- 17) BROW DITCH CONFLUENCE STRUCTURE (SEE DET. D- 17) 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 10 LF $4.50 LF $8.00 LF $7.00 LF $3.00 SF $3.50 TOTAL COST $62,824.50 $1,656.00 $1,540.00 $3,465.00 $2,985.50 EA $4OO.O0 $4,OOO.00 3 EA $500.00 3 EA $500.00 4,7..20 SF $4.00 467 LF $15.00 341,381 SF $0.20 170 LF $2.00 2,070 LF $7.00 5 EA $300.00 340 LF $8.50 2 EA $1,000.00 37 EA $30.00 4 EA $400.00 610 LF $7.50 1,824 LF $8.00 1,135 LF $9.00 3,034 SF $24.00 1 EA $300.00 1 EA $400.00 $1,600.00 $1,500.00 $16,880.00 $7,005.00 $68,276.20 $340.00 $14,490.00 $1,500.00 $2,890.00 $2,000.00 $1,110.00 $1,600.00 $4,575.00 $14,592.00 $10,215.00 $72,816.00 $300.00 $400.00 Page3o[ll -. ijm~r79stg4.wk106-Dec-95 STATE ItlGHV/AY 79 NORTH - WINCtF, STER ROAD (FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF, STER CREEK RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RI). INTERSECTIONS ~ SAaN'TA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DECEMBER 1, 1995 C. STREET IMPROVEMENTS (CONT0 ITEM NO. DESCRIYHON 49 CONCRETEBARRIER TYPE 50A PER CALTRANS STD. B3-3 METAL BEAM GUARD RAIL SEE CALTRANS STD. A77A THRU A77K D. STORM DRAIN ITEMS ITEM NO. DESCRlY~0N 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 24" RCP CLASS IV 30" RCP (1350-D) 36" RCP (1350-D) 42" RCP (1350-D) 48" RCP (1350-D) LIGHT CLASS RIPRAP MEIHOD 'B' MIRAFI 700X FILTER FABRIC 6' THICK 3/4" GRAVEL BLANKET CONCRETE COil PER RCFC&WCD STD. M-803 REMOVE EXIST. CONC. BULKHEAD CMP RISER PER CALTRANS STD. D75 CFYPE GMP) MANHOLE PER RCFC&WCD STD. MH 251 STRAIGHT HEAD WALL PER CALTRANS STD. D-89 (12)=36") STRAIGHTHEADWAIJ. PER CALTRANS STD. D-89 (D=24") "L" TYPE I{EADWAIJ. PER CALTRANS STD. D-89 REMOVE EXIST. HEADWAI .1. CATCH BASIN PER RCFC&WCD STD CB- 100 (W = 14') CB PER RCFC&WCD STD. D - 100 W/UNDERSIDEWALK D RAI/q CATCH BASIN PER RCFC&WCD STD. CB-100 (W=21') TYPE COL INLET PER CALTRANS STD. D-72 (W= 10') QUANTITY 60 130 UNITCOST/UNH' TOTALCOST LF $80.00 $4,800.00 LF $50.00 TOTAL QUANTITY LrNITCOST/UN~ 1,616 LF $35.00 116 LF $44.00 1,161 LF $55.00 163 LF $60.00 990 LF $67.00 46 CY $41) .00 1,600 SF $0.50 4 CY $30.00 4 EA $400.00 2 EA $50.00 2 EA $2,000.00 4 EA $2,500.00 1 EA $2,200.00 1 EA $2,000.00 1 EA $2,000.00 3 EA $200.00 1 EA $4,500.00 1 EA $5,000.00 1 EA $6,500.00 2 F.A. $5,000.00 $6,500.00 $2,302,81920 TOTAL COST $56,565.95 $5,082.00 $63,862.70 $9,772.20 $66,352.11 $1,840.00 $800.00 $120.00 $1,600.00 $100.00 $4,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,200.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $600.00 $4,500.00 $5,000.00 $6,500.00 $10,000.00 Page 4 of 11 ljmNsr79stg4.wk106-Ekc-95 STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - W'INC}-rKqTER ROAD (FROM MARGAEITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF. STER CREEK RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS KD. INTERSECTIONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - AREA1 ENG~R'S ESTIMATE DECERBER 1, 1995 D. STORM DRAIN ITEMS (CObIT.) ITEM NO, DESCRIPTION 70 ' TYPE 'OL' INLET PER CALTRANS STD, D-72 (W=14') 71 TYPE 'OL' INLET PER CALTRANS STD, D-72 72 MODIFIED TYPE 'OL' INI.I:I W= 14' (SEE DETAIL SILT. D- 16) 73 MODIFIED FLAT OU'ILET PER RCRD STD. 303 (SEE DET. D - lo') 74 LOCAL DEPRESSION NO. 2 PER RCFC&WCD STD. CB-201 75 GUITER DEPKESSION PER CALTRANS STD. D-78 (D=3D 76 RAISE EXIST, M/-I, COVER AND FRAME TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL EM NO. DESCRJFIION 77 78 79 QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 8O 16 EA $4,500.00 $72,000.00 1 EA $6,500.00 $6,500.00 6 EA $5,500.00 $33,000.00 1 EA $2,000.00 $2.,000.00 56 LF $15.00 $840.00 583 LF $15.00 $8,745.00 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 TOTAL $378,979.96 81 82 83 84 QUANTITY UNIT COST/UNIT TOTAL COST 85 86 87 88 89 90 --- 91 TEMP, WARNING TRAFFIC SIGNS (60' X 2,4' AVERAGE) TEMP. WARNING TRAFFIC SIGNS (48" X 48' AVERAGE) TEMP. WARNING TRAFFIC SIGNS (36" X 36' AVERAGE) TEM2P. WARNING TRAFFIC SIGNS (24" X 24' AVERAGE) TYPE rv ARROW (L/R) PAVEMENT MARKINGS TYPE VI ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS TYPE VII (LTmT) TURN/FHRU MAKKINGS TEXT PAVEMENT MARKINGS (STOP AHEAD, ETC.) 4" WHITE LANE DETAIL NO.12 4' YI~J.OW CENTER DETAIL NO. 22 4' yl~ .1 -OW EDGE DETAIL NO. 25 4' WHITE EDGE DETAIL NO. 27B 4' Y~ I .OW MEDIAN DETAIL 29 8" WItITE DROPLANE DETAIL NO. 37B 5 22 31 EA $350.00 $1,750.00 EA $250.00 $5,500.00 EA $150.00 $4,650.00 26 EA $100.00 $2,600.00 20 EA $35.00 $700.00 4 EA $35.00 $140.00 4 EA $35.00 $140.00 16 EA $40.00 500 EA $10.00 120 LF $0.20 14,100 LF $0.45 650 LF $0.25 28,520 LF $0.20 7~.00 LF $0.60 150 LF $035 $64.0.00 $5,000.00 $24.00 $6345.00 $16250 $5,704.00 $4320.00 $5250 Page 5 o[ 11 ljm~r79stg4.wk106-Dcc-95 STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - WINCI-IF~TER ROAD (FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF_.,TYER CREEK RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTIONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - AREA1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DECEMBER 1, 1995 E. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL (con"tO ITEM NO. DESCRIlYHON QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 15 17 19 8" WHITE CHANN. DETAIL NO. 38 12" WHITE LIMIT LINE BARRICADE TYPE III TYPE B - YELLOW FLASHER TEMP. K-RAIL (RELOCATE AS R~QOqRED) TEMP. CRASH CUSHION (ARRAY T-~) SAND FILLED PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN (PROJ. DURATION) REMOVE EXIST. TEMP. STRIPES & MARXINGS (Le. SANDBLASTING) TEMPORARY RAMP FOR PHASING (OPTION) AC PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE CLASS II ASPHALTIC EMULSION 2,230 LF $035 $78050 320 LF $0.80 $256.00 95 LF $10.00 $950.00 1 EA $100.00 $100.00 5,000 LF $20.00 $100,000.00 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00 2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000.00 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 TOTAL $186,814.50 1,919 TON $25.50 $48,934.50 1,703 CY $15.00 $25,545.00 2 TON $320.00 $640.00 TOTAL $75,119.50 F. WATER RELOCATION ITEM NO. DESCRIFIION QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 100 24' CML&C WATER (10GA.) 101 20" CM2L&C WATER (12GA.) 102 20' CML&C WATER (gGA.) 103 16" CML&C WATER (12GA.) 104 WATERLINE PIPE SUPPORT (SEE DET. SHT. 4 OF 5) lo5 45o ELBOW (2o') 106 45° ELBOW (16") 107 45° ELBOW 12") 108 24" X 9o FABRICATED BEND 109 24" X 10° FABRICATED BEND 110 24" X 8° FABRICATED BEND II1 12~ X 2° BEND ('PVC) CL 200 112 20" BLrlTERFLY VALVE 113 16" BUTYERFLY VALVE 114 20"X20"X12" TEE 115 16" TEE 24 LF $65.00 $1,560.00 1,428 LF $55.00 $78,540.00 243 LF $60.00 $14,580.00 230 LF $45.00 $10,350.00 17 EA $30.00 $510.00 10 EA $1,000.00 $10,000.00 2 EA $900.00 $1,800.00 2 EA $800.00 $1,600.00 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000.00 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 2 EA $300.00 $600.00 3 EA $3,000.00 $9,000.00 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 1 EA $1,800.00 $1,800.00 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Page 6 of 11 ljmNsr79stg4.wk106 - Dec- 95 STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - WINCHESTER ROAD (FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCItE,TFER CEF-F-K RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTIONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - AREAi ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DECEMBER 1, 1995 F. WATER RELOCATION (CONT.) ITEM NO. DESCRIFHON QUAN'HTY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 116 4" BLOW - OFF ASSY. 117 2"AV & AR ASSY. 118 20" X 16" ECCENTRIC REDUCER 119 6" FIE HYDRANT ASSY. 120 FX RING TYPE CONNECIOR 121 2-WIRE TEST STATION PER RW-40A 122 4- WIRE TEST STATION PER RW-41 123 CONC. THRUST BLOCK W/SHEAR RING 124 CONC. THRUST BLOCK 125 30" ST~=~- CASING 1/2' THICKPER RW-23 126 CONC. ENCASEMENT NO. 2 PER RW-27 127 12" PVC C-900 CL 200 128 CUT AND JOIN 12' PVC 129 CUT AND JOIN 12" PVC TO 12" ACP 130 CUT AND JOIN 16" ~C ~ .D AT .I. JOINTS) 13 1 CUT AND JOIN 16" CML&C TO 16" ACP (WELD AT-T -3OINTS @ CIvIL&C) 132 CUT AND JOIN20" CML&C (WELD AI J- JOINTS) 133 CUT AND JOIN 24" CML&C (WELD AI .1. JOINTS) 134 DE - WATERING EXISTING - 12" WATERLINE 135 DE-WATERING EXISTING - 16" WATEltl 136 DE-WATERING EXIS'IING -20" WATERLINE 137 DE-WATERING EXISTING - 24' WATERLINE 138 REMOVE & RELOCATE EXIST. FI-I ASSY. 139 REMOVE & Rb'~l OCATE EXIST. AV & AR ASSY. 140 ADJUST EXIST. VALVE COVER TO GRADE 141 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD EXIST. 24" CML&C 142 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD EXIST. 20" CML&C 143 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD EXIST. 16" CML&C 144 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD EXIST. 20" X 16" REDUCER 145 REMOVE & RETURN TO RCWD EXIST. FH 146 REMOVE & REKIRN TO RCWD EXIST. BO 147 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD EXIST. 16' TEE 1 EA $2,000.00 $2,000.00 2 EA · '$1,500.00 $3,000.00 1 EA $3,500.00 $3,5OO.00 1 EA $2.500.00 $2,500.00 1 EA $700.00 $700.00 3 EA $4O0.00 $1,200.00 3 EA $600.00 $1,800.00 2 EA $350.00 $700.00 I3 EA $200.00 $2,600.00 239 LF $150.00 $35,850.00 99 LF $30.00 $2,970.00 10 LF $35.00 $350.00 1 EA $1,300.00 $1,300.00 2 EA $1300.00 $2,600.00 1 EA $1,600.00 $1,600.00 1 EA $1,600.00 $1,600.00 3 EA $1,800.00 $5,400.00 2 EA $9_.000.00 $4,000.00 1 EA $8O0.00 $800.00 1 EA $900.00 $900.00 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 1 EA $1,100.00 $1,100.00 6 EA $2.,000.00 $12,000.00 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 13 EA $200.00 $2,600.00 24 LF $35.00 $840.00 440 LF $20.00 $8,800.00 170 LF $15.00 $2,550.00 1 EA $100.00 $100.00 1 EA $200.00 $200.00 1 EA $200.00 $200.00 1 EA $100.00 $100.00 PaR: 7 of 11 ljm~r795tg4.wk106-De, c-95 ITEM NO. STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - WINCHESTER ROAD (FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WIN~R CREEK RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTIONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4- AREA1 ENGIN~-~-R'S ESTIMATE DECEMBER 1, 1995 WATER til~I-OCATION (CONY.) DESCRIPTION QUAN'ITFY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 148 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD EXIST. BUTI'ERFLY VALVE 149 REMOVE AND DISPOSE AC PIPE (12' & 150 20' CML~C TO BE ABANDONED AND SLI/RRY Fn .LED (2-BAG) 151 REMOVE AND DISPOSE 12' PVC 152 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST. WAT. FACILrrlES 4 EA $400.00 '$1,600.00 180 LF $30.00 $5,400.00 1,220 LF $10.00 $12,200.00 1~ LF $7.00 $1,008.00 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL $281,408.00 G. SEWER R~-OCATIONS ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 153 RAISE EXIST. MAN'HOLE COVER & FRAME 154 ADJUST EXIST. MANHOLE COVER TO GKADE 155 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST. SEW. FACILITIES QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 9 EA $700.00 $6,300.00 9 EA $500.00 $4,500.00 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 TOTAL $15,800.00 H. BACKBONEfSUBDMSION UTILITY TRENCH ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 156 BACKBONE UTILITY TRENCH 157 SUBDMSION UTILITYTRENCH 44O 565 LF $25.00 $11,000.00 LF $25.00 $14,125.00 TOTAL $25,125.00 I. SIGNAL INTER CONNECT ITEM NO. DESCRIFrION 158 1-1/2" PVC COND. SCH. 80 W/i2 PR. #20 SIGNAL IC CABLE 159 SIGNAL INTERCONNECT PULL BOX NO5 160 2" PVC COND. SCH. 80, W/12 PR. #20 SIGNAL IC CABLE 161 TYPE ~IVI' CABINET/SPLICE BOX 162 #20 SIGNAL IC CABLE QUANTITY 4,150 60 5,400 15 75 UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST LF $12.00 $49,800.00 EA $120.00 $7,200.00 LF $16.00 $86,400.00 EA $300.00 $4,500.00 LF $25.00 $1,875.00 TOTAL $149,775.00 Page 8 of I1 ljm~sr79stg4.wk106-Dec-95 STATE HIGHWAY 7P NORTH - WIN~R ROAD CFROM MARGAKITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WIN~R CREW. INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSE~ONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - A_REA1 ENGINEER'S F, STIMATE DECEMBER 1, 1995 J. EROSION CONTROL ('INCLUDING BORROW SITE) ITEM NO. DESCKEPTION QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT 163 HYDROSEEDING 164 1- BAG HIGH SANDBAG 165 2-BAG HIGH SANDBAG 166 3-BAG HIGH SANDBAG 167 STRAW BALE BARRIER 168 DESILTING BASIN EXCAVATION 57 6" TI-IICK 3/4" GRAVEL BLANKET 593,000 SF $0.04 11,500 LF $150 1,865 LF $3.00 600 LF $5.00 2,420 LF $3.00 120 CY $2.00 25 CY $30.00 TOTAL IC FINAL STRIPING AND SIGNING ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 81 83 86 87 88 90 91 92 99 TRAFFIC SIGNS 6" X 15" TRAFFIC SIGNS 24" X 36" (AVE.) TRAFFIC SIGNS 36" X 36" (AVE.) TRAFFIC SIGNS 48" X 48' (AVE.) TRAFFIC SIGNS 66" X REMOVE OR Rg~-OCATE EXIST. TRAFFIC SIGNS 4' Y~ .1 -OW NO PASSING LANE DETAIL NO. 21 TYPE IV ARROW (LT/RT) PAVEMENT MARKINGS TYPE VII (LT/RT) TLrRNFrHRU PAVEMENT MARKINGS TEXr PAVEMENT MARKINGS (STOP AHEAD, ETC.) 4" WHITE lANE DETAIL NO. 12 4" ~ J .OW CENTER DETAIL NO. 22 4" Y~ J .OW EDGE DETAIL NO. 25 4" yFI _1.0W MEDIAN DETAIL NO. 29 8" WHITE DROPLANE DETAIL NO. 3713 8" WHITE CHANN. DETAIL NO. 38 REMOVE EXIST. TEMP. STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKING (Le. SANDBLASTING) TOTAL COST $23,720.00 $17,250.00 $5,595.00 $3,000.00 $7,260.00 $240.00 $750.00 $57,815.00 TOTAL COST 5 EA $75.00 $375.00 12 EA $125.00 $1,500.00 10 EA $150.00 $1,500.00 10 EA $325.00 $3,250.00 1 EA $350.00 ~350.00 12 EA 1,40.00 $480.00 180 LF $02.5 $45.00 43 EA $35.00 $1,505.00 1 EA $35.00 $35.00 50 EA $35.00 32,643 LF $0.20 200 LF $0.45 13980 LF $0.25 1610 LF $0.60 555 LF $035 2835 LF $035 $1,750.00 $6528.60 $90.00 $3,495.00 $966.00 $194.25 $992.25 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 TOTAL $43,056.10 Page 9 of 11 ijm~r79stg4.wk106-Dec-95 STATE ltlGHWAY 79 NORTH - WIN~R ROAD CFROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WIN~R CREEK RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGIt, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTIONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - AREA1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DECEMBER 1, 1995 L. BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 176 MOBrI_.IZATION (BRIDGE) 177 REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE 178 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BR/DGE) 179 STRUCURE EXCAVATION CrYPE D) 180 STRUCTURE BACKFTI .I, (BRIDGE) 181 FURNISH PILING (CLAS,S 45) 182 DRIVE PILES (CLASS 45) 183 FURNISH PILING (CLASS 70) 184 DRIVE PIES (CLASS 70) 185 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE 186 STRUCTURAL CONCP, EI~ BRIDGE FOOTING 187 STRUCTURAL CONCRErE, APPROACH SLAB 188 BAR REINFORCING STEE~ (BRIDGE) 189 MISCKI J ANEOUS METAL, BRIDGE ~90 JOINT SEAL TYPE B (MR= F) 191 TUBULA~ HAND RAILING 7.92 CONCRETE BARRIER 193 WATERSTOP LESS .25% OF COST (NON-PHASED CONSTRUCTION) QUANTITY UNIT COSTFtJNIT 1 · LS $120,000.00 1 LS 67,200.00 583 CY $35.00 324 CY $100.00 335 CY $45.00 2,384 LF $15.00 66 EA $1,000.00 1,t02 LF $15.00 42 LF $1,000.00 1,653 CY $350.00 192 CrY' $300.00 284 CY $250.00 478,700 L,B $050 9,890 LB $3.00 254 LF $60.00 397 LF $20.00 397 LF $60.00 254 LF $15.00 TOTAL COST $120,000.00 $67,200.00 $20,405.00 $32,400.00 $15,075.00 $35,760.00 $66,000.~ $19,530.00 $42,000.00 $578,550.00 $57,600.00 $71,000.00 $239,350.00 $29,670.00 $15,2tm.oo --- $7,940.0,, $23,820.00 $3,810.00 $1,445~350.00 1 LS $361,337.00 ($361,337.0(}) TOTAL $1,084,013.00 Page 10 of 11 ljmNsr79stg4.wk106-De, c-95 STATE HIGtt~AY ~ NORTH - ~N~TER ROAD (FROM MARGAR1TA RD. TO 550 -LF NORTH OF V/INCHF, STER CREEK RD.) INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS P,D. INTERSECTIONS AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE STAGE 4 - AREA1 ENGINEER'S ESTtMATE DECEMBER 1. 1995 M ITEM NO. 194 CHANNKI- CONSTRUCTION DESCRIFHON 6" CLASS A CONC .CHANNEL LINING W/#4 @ 18" EACH WAY 195 6" CLASS A CONCRETE CUT OFF WAY .I . SEE DET. 'G' 'SHT. 15 OF 19 196 6" CLASS A CONCRETE 10U~224" FOOTING SEE DET. 'F SHT. 15 OF 19 197 3" WK, F~ HOLES PER RCFCaWCD STD. 326 198 JUNCTION STRUCTURE NO. 6 PER RC"FC&WCD STD. NO JSZB1 199 1/4 TON RIPRAP 200 REMOVE EXIST. RIPRAP 12 OVEREX AND RECOMPACT 52 36" RCP (1350-D) 56 MIRAF1700X FILTER FABRIC 57 6' THICK 3/4" GRAVEL BLANKET QUANTITY TOTAL COST 20,100 SF $350 $70,350.00 1,005 SF $550 $5,52750 1,340 SF $15.00 $20,100.00 67 EA $50.00 $3,350.00 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 17 CY $45.00 $765.00 2,400 CY $25.00 $60,000.00 1,540 CY $1.00 Sl,540.00 83 LF $55.00 $4,56830 500 SF $050 $250.00 9 CrY $30.00 $270.O0 TOTAL $168,220.80 N. SIGNALITATION ITEM NO. DESCRIFHON 201 202 SIGNAL AT NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTION SIGNAL RECONFIGURATION AT MARGARITA KID, INTERSECTION QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST 1 LS $135,000.00 $135,000.00 · 1 LS $65,000.00 $65,000.00 TOTAL $200,000.00 GRAND TOTAL $6,453,074.56 Pag~ 11 of 11 ijm~r79stg4.wk106-Dec-95 ITEM 25 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl'. c T I Y ATTORNEY ,., / FINANCE DIRE' '-"' CITY MANAG C|TY O[ TEMECU~A AGENDA REPORT City CounciUCitV Manager Mary 3ene Mckarney, Assistant City Manager February 13, 1996 Award of 8id for 8eOeecement Computer Workstations PREPARED BY: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1 ) Award a bid for the purchase of the replacement computer workstations for city hall, Bid Number 96-01 to Golden State Trading Company, Brea, CA for $205,608.55. 2) Approve an Operating Transfer from the General Fund to the Information Services Internal Services Fund in the amount of $200,000. BACKGROUND: On January 5, 1996 the city solicited public bids for the purchase of 80 Personal Computer Workstations to replace existing computer workstations at city hall. The current computer workstations have been primarily in service since 1990-91 and have outlived their useful life span. The current computers are 386sx, 20MHz processors, with 1-2MB RAM, and no hard drives. This technology is outdated and will not be able to operate the newer software packages that are needed to efficiently support the operations of each department. In addition, the city has recently connected to the County wide area network. This connection will provide full electronic mail access to not only the county offices, but to outside state and federal agencies through the Internet electronic mail system. This connection will future enhance the citys communications capability. The city has utilized a DOS based application platform since 1990. Staff recommends that we move to a Windows based platform as that platform is needed to support records management imaging, and the latest applications of integrated word processing, spreadsheets and data base applications. This integrated format will allow users to work with multiple applications simultaneously, thereby dramatically increasing staff productivity. AGENDA REPORT - Award of Bid for Replacement ComPuter Workstations Staff is recommending that we purchase the equipment ahead of the new city hall move because this equipment is needed to support the records management imaging and because the old hardware is beginning to fail. The equipment is transferrable to the new city hall. The bid package consisted of 80 Pentlure workstations. Each workstation consists of an Intel 133MHz processor, 16MB RAM, a hard drive, SVGA color monitor and ergonomic keyboard. designed to reduce work related injuries. This workstation will operate all of the necessary applications that are currently required. This state of the art workstation will increase individual and departmental productivity. Thirteen (13) bids were publicly opened on January 25, 1996 and the results are as follows: Bidder Bid Amount 1. Golden State Trading Company, Brea $205,608.55 2. New Technologies, Santa Fe Springs $209,162.30 3. Butterfield Electronics (Radio Shack), Temecula $219,350.00 4. Software House International, Huntington Beach $227,461.35 5. Valley Micro Computers, Temecula $227,920.20 6. Jaguar/MicroAge Computers, Riverside $232,411.66 7. Compu Systems, Walnut $233,338.51 8. LPS Computer Service, Escondido $249,138.73 9. Inacom Information Systems, San Diego $253,217.54 10. System Design Computers, San Diego $258,821.00 11. 4 Tech Computer Company, Elsinore $280,439.65 12. MicroAge of Temecula, Temecula $297,810.27 13. CompUSA, San Marcos $412,066.23 Staff reviewed the bid proposal from Golden State Trading Company, and found that the proposal was complete and in order. Golden State Trading Company has done business with the City in the past, and has always provided good reliable service. FISCAL IMPACT: Revenues are available in the Information Systems Internal Services Fund to assist in the funding of this computer replacement. However, a transfer from the General Fund is requested to maintain an adequate level of reserves in the Internal Service Fund for future Information Systems related equipment needs. ITEM 26 TO.' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager February 13, 1996 Amendment to Lease Agreement PREPARED BY: ~ Herman D. Parker, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve an amendment to the Real Property Lease Agreement between the Temecula Town Association and the City of Temecula regarding the operation and maintenance of Rotary Park. BACKGROUND: On October 10, 1995, the Board of Directors approved and entered a real property lease agreement with the Temecula Town Association (TTA) to enable the City to maintain and operate Rotary Park as a public park and part of the city's existing park system. The park site, located at 28816 Pujol Street, directly to the north side of the TTA's Community Center, is currently under construction and is tentatively scheduled for completion in May of 1996. In Exhibit B of the original lease agreement, the TTA requested to retain access to the Caboose which is located at the southern end of the park site. The TTA also agreed to be responsible for maintaining the interior and exterior of the Caboose. As of January 1996, the TTA no longer needs to use or maintain access to the Caboose. As a result, staff is recommending that the original lease agreement be amended to allow the City to utilize the Caboose to expand city services in the Old Town Temecula area. It is envisioned that the Caboose would be used to facilitate the delivery of the Problem Oriented Policing (POP) program. This program would provide police presence and visibility in the Old Town Temecula area. FISCAL IMPACT: The maintenance of the Caboose and annual operating expenses associated with the Problem Oriented Policing program are approximately $10,000. These funds will be considered by the City Council during the mid-year budget adjustments. ATTACHMENT: Amendment to Lease Agreement FIRST AIV!'F~~ TO RE&L PROPERTY LEASE BETWEEN TF. AVlF,~ULA TOWN ASSOCIATION AND CITY OF TEMECULA (ROTARY PARK) TRIg FIRST AMENDMENT TO REAL PROPERTY LEASE is entered into by and between the City of Temecula, a California general hw municipal corporation. ("Tenant") and the Temecula Town Association, a California non-profit corporation ("Landlord") and shall 'be dated as of February 13, 1996. In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and for other 'good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. This First Amendment is made with respect to the following facts, which each of the parties agree are correct: a. On October 10, 1995, the Landlord and Tenant entered into the "Real Property Lease" (the "Lease") by which the Tenant leased certain real property in the City of Temecula for the development of Rotary Park. b. The Lease describes in Section 1.0 1 the real property which is to be leased to the Tenant, excluding certain appurtenances, easements or Improvements on the property which are specifically described in Exhibit B of the Lease. Exhibit B provides that the Landlord reserves to itseft the use of the Caboose which is located at the southern end of the Park. c. The Landlord no longer needs to use the Caboose and the parties now intend to amend the Lease so as to allow the City to use the Caboose for park and recreational purposes and for a police substation. 2. Exhibit B to the Lease is hereby amended by deleting the August 31, 1995 letter from John Sterling, General Manager, Temecula Town Association, to the City of Temecula and the map showing the Caboose attached thereto and inserting in their place the word "None." 3. Section 3.01 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 3.01 Permitted Use. Tenant shall use the Premises solely for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating a public park and associated recreational facilities and for maintaining a police substation in the Caboose structure on the Premises. Tenant shall not change the primary use of the Premises without first obtaining the written consent of the Landlord." i:~NELSON~MNDMNT.TFA 7JI/9~ 4. Except as specifically set forth in this First Amendment, all other terms of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this First Amendment to Real Property Lease has been executed by the authorized representatives of the parties as of the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA Attest: Karel Lindemans Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION By: Buck Kemmis President TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD JANUARY 23, 1996 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:38 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron Roberts presiding. PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Stone, Roberrs ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4. The motion was unanimously carried. 2 3 4 r:\minutee.csd\012396 Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996. Tree Trimmine Contract - Community Services Department 2.1 Award contract for trimming trees in Saddlewood, Martinique, Woodcrest Country, and Vintage Hills slope maintenance areas to Golden Bear Arborists, Inc. in the amount of $19,990. Release of Landscaoe Bonds - Taylor Woodrow Homes/Vintaae Hills Develooment (Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway) 3.1 Authorize the City Clerk to exonerate the remaining landscape bonds for Tract Nos. 22715-0; 22715-1,22715-2; 22716-1,22915-0 and 22916-1. Combininc) Balance Sheet as of Seotember 30, 1995 and the Statement of Revenues. Exoenditures and Chanqes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30.1995 4.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1995 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1995. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None given. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 7:40 PM to a meeting on February 13, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, President June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk r:\minutes.csd\012396 -2- ITEM 2 APPROV, CITY ATTORNEY ' FINANCE DIREjT~ CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO-' Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: February 13, 1996 SUBJECT: Fence Installation Contract - Temecula Duck Pond PREPARED BY: ~ RECOMMENDATION: Bruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent That the Board of Directors: Award contract of $22,985 to Rancho Recycled Products for the installation of 1783 linear feet of white, two-rail trail fencing at the Temecula Duck Pond. BACKGROUND: The Community Services Department obtained two cost quotes for the replacement of the existing wood, split-rail fencing at the Temecula Duck Pond. The two quotes compared concrete fencing, which has been utilized in several neighbood parks, with recycled plastic fencing that has been installed at two City parks with favorable results. Rancho Recycled Products of Temecula submitted an installed price of $22,985 for plastic fencing. Designer Concrete Products of Los Angeles submitted a price of 932,761 for the installation of concrete fencing. Both companies are considered to be sole-source providers of their type of product, therefore three competitive bids were not necessary. In addition to being a more cost effective product, the Community Services Department has found the aesthetics and durability of the recycled material to be superior to that of the concrete. Therefore it is recommended that Rancho Recycled Products be awarded this contract as the best product for the intended application. In addition, the use of recycled products is appropriate for a City park and a local vendor will able to provide a high level of customer service, FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the fence installation contract is 922,985. Sufficient funds exist in the current capital improvement budget for the Temecula Duck Pond, account number 210-190-143-5804. ATTACHMENTS: 1 ) Agreement 122994 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement was made and entered into this 10th day of January 19 95, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Rancho Recycled Products., a Corporation ("'Contractor"). The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Services. Contractor shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". Performance. Contractor shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Payment. The City agrees to pay Contractor following completion of specified work. An amount not to exceed $22,985.03 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00. Contractor will submit invoices upon completion of specified work for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. Amendments· This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Contractor. Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the iaermission of the Contractor. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Contractor at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Contractor shall be paid for the services performed. Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 3b~cu~ract~nifnc.~ 10. 11. 12. Status of Contractor. Contractor is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Term. This Agreement shall commence on February 14,19 96, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30,19 96. Subcontracts. The Contractor shall be permitted to enter into a subcontract for fence removal and installation services as needed to complete the Contractor's portion of this Agreement. At all times, Rancho Recycled Products shall be primarily responsible for the performance of the tasks described herein. Contractor shall provide City with fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Moore Fence Co. from Contractor's employ. Upon such notice, the City shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be for the value of service rendered to the City. Default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, shall not be considered a default. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Contractor arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Contractor shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et seq. City and Contractor shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: a. City: 13. 14. 15. Attention: City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Contractor: Bullet Anderson Rancho Recycled Products 27840 Del Rio Rd., Suite C Temecula, CA 92590 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. Liability. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Contractor agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Contractor. Contractor shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of Contractor, the City shall add Contractor to the City's workers' compensation policy and the Contractor to the City's workers' compensation policy and the Contractor shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums. Licenses. Contractor and Subcontractor shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to, City Business Licenses. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCTS CITY OF TEMECULA By: By Print Name and Title Ron Roberts, President APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TASKS TO BE PERFORMED/SCOPE OF WORK Perform the following:tasks as specified at the Temecula Duck Pond, located at the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, in the City of Temecula. Furnish all labor and materials necessary to remove and dispose of approximately 1800 lineal feet of existing wood split-rail fence material and install 1,783 lineal feet of new two-rail fence (made of recycled material), 36" in height, with 2" x 4" x 36" twisted steel wire attached to the fence (each rail) at intervals not to exceed (4) feet. Install (1) 16' double-wide gate and (2) 4' gates to match fence material. Gates shall be constructed of galvanized steel tubing, with all galvanized hardware, and with recycled fence material mounted to the steel gate structure. The support posts for the gates shall be filled with concrete to insure structural integrity. The gates shall have heavy duty steel hinges of a type suitable for the weight of the gates. Exact location of the gates shall be determined by the City Maintenance Superintendent. The fence posts shall be spaced no greater than eight feet apart, and shall have a concrete footing of 12"in diameter x 18" minimum depth. A round ternplate shall be utilized when pouring the concrete around each post to insure a uniform shape. Finish grade of cement footing shall be 1" above grade. Each post shall be set 1 ' 3" into the ground. The removal of existing fence material shall coincide with the installation of the new fence so that the site is not left completely open to the street during construction. At the completion of each day's work, the site shall be left in a clean, safe condition. At the completion of the project the site shall be left thoroughly clean. Work to be completed in one continuous operation, weather permitting, and at no time shall the performance of the work block any public street, sidewalk, or create a hazard to the public. 3b\c~ntmct~lf~.e.a~t ITEM 3 CITY ATTORNA~ROV"~/~ DIRECTOR OF FI ~E ~ CITY MANAGERI~_ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: February 13, 1996 SUBJECT: Release of Labor and Materials Bond for Voorburg Park - Nicolas Road and North General Kearney Road. PREPARED BY: ~::~eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Authorize the City Clerk to release the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for the construction of Voorburg Park - Van Daele Development Corporation. BACKGROUND: On May 11, 1993, the Board of Directors entered into a Parkland/Landscape Agreement with: Van Daele Development Corporation/Rancho 126 Ltd. 2900 Adams Street, Ste. C-25 Riverside, CA 92504 for the construction of a .26 acre park within Tract No. 22627-0. Upon receiving clear title to the property, Voorburg Park was officially dedicated to the City on July 11,1995. On July 25, 1995, the Faithful Performance Bond was exonerated by the Board of Directors. The remaining surety bonds, issued by the Golden Eagel Insurance Company, are identified as follows: 1. Labor and Materials Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $16,376.00. 2. Warranty Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $3,276.00. Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be released six months after the completion and acceptance of the park, pending the settlement of any claims or obligations by the developer. Subsequently, the City Clerk has verified that no claims have been filed by persons providing labor or materials for the construction of Voorburg Park. Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Labor and Materials Bond for this facility. The remaining warranty bond shall be retained for period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. r:\yasinobkWoorburg.lxlr 021396 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Labor and Materials Bond. Staff Report Dated July 25, 1995. r:\ynainobk\voorburg.Mr 021396 CITY OF TEMECULA Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 Premium included in Performance Bond PARIG_ANID/LANDSCAPE LABOR AND 'MATERIALS BOND WI-II=-KEAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and van Daele/Rancho 126, Ltd. , (hereinafter desi~nated as "Principal") have entered into an A~eement whereby Principal agTe, es to install and complete certainPaxkland Improvements, which said AgTeement, dated March 25 , 19 93 , and identified as Project Signature Series , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WI-I]::REAS, under the terms of said Agreement, Principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to fie a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and NOW, ~ORE, we the principal and Golden Eagle Insllrant~urcl~y,Ya/e held and fu-mly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen, and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid Agreement and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of $16,376:0~)lawful money of the United States, for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for mounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will pay the same in an mount not exceeding the mount set forth. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face mount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgement rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and ageed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of l~art 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to ~ve a fight of action to them or theix assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Lf the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligation sha.ll become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Ageement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications. II',r WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on 1~arch 29 , 1993 Acknowledgement stat.__~e of CALIFORNIA On 3-26-93 before me, Kristi L. ~ / of Riverside personally appearea Patrick J. Van Daele Executive Vice President Blanchard r......KI~IS'I'I L. BLANCHARD COMM. ~977337 ~ Notary Ptt:ac-Callfon-,fa · _ (This area for official Seal) personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis at satisfactory evidence) to De the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl- edged to me that he/she/they executed the some in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s], Or the entity upon behalf of which the persOn(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. AIl'ENTION NOTARY: Although rne ~nforrnafiOn reQueste<3 below is OPTIONAL, it cout¢l Dfevent ffauclulenl a~ochment at this Certificate to another Clocumenr THiS CERTIFICATE MUST BE AT[ACHED Title or Type of Document TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Number of Pages __Date of Document rr- 110o ( 11/QO) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above Cerrific:xce of Acknowtedgemen~ 5T~ OF C~LLFORNIA ,)n March 29, 1993 ?e~onsjly .~opes~d R. Vic~es b~ore me, ,qocarv PubLic :e.,~onaL[y known m me. ' ' . to be me Oersonl~ whose namea! ~:ewsubscnbed to me '.v~mm mscrumenc 3nd acknowte~,ed r~ me r, har. fi/shea~Lm{ executed the same m-iG~'/her/~T~[au~otce~ c~acx..wd~. ~qd th~ by , ~her/~sl~zmr~ on the instant me Oe~om,~. or the enuff uoon Oen~ 0f wnic~ the oe~onl:~ acc~. ex~t~ c~e ~menc. OFFICIAL SF..AL VICTORIA M. CA:~PBE'. NOTARY P,~BLIC- CAL:FORN;.\i PRINCIPAL OFrICF,, ORA~GF. COUNT; C~MMISSION F.,XglRES NOV. ,5, 1,9~4 FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: None. 1. 2. Labor and Materials Bond. Staff Report Dated July 25, 1995. r:\ynainobk\voorburg.bdr 021396 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager July 25, 1995 Release of Faithful Performance Bond for Voorburg Park PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Authorize the release of the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance construction of Voorburg Park - Van Daele Development Corporation. Bond BACKGROUND: On May 11, 1993, the Board of Directors entered Parkland/Landscape Agreement with: Van Daele Development Corporation/Rancho 126 Ltd. 2900 Adams Street, Ste. C-25 Riverside, CA 92504 for the into a for the construction of a .26 acre park within Tract No. 22627-0, currently known as Voorburg Park. Accompanying the parkland agreement were surety bonds issued by the Golden Eagle Insurance Company, as follows: Faithful Performance Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $32,751 .00. Labor and Materials Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $16,376.00. Warranty Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $3,276.00. On July 11, 1995, the Board of Directors accepted the grant deed for Voorburg Park. The park has been constructed pursuant to the approved plans and inspected and approved by the City's Maintenance Superintendent. Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Faithful Perfor-mance Bond for this facility. The Warranty Bond, in the amount of ten percent of the Faithful Performance Bond, shall be retained for a period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. r: \yuinobk\voorburg. bnd 07~95 Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be retained for an additional six months to allow for the settlement of all claims and obligations concerning those persons furnishing labor and materials for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is anticipated from the release of the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond. ATTACHMENTS: Vicinity Map Parkland/Landscape Agreement Surety Bonds r:\ya~inobk\voorburg.bnd 072595 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING HELD JANUARY 23, 1996 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:40 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Stone to approve Consent Calendar Item No. I and 2. The motion was unanimously carried. I Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996. 2 CombininQ Balance Sheet as of Seotember 30.1995 and the Statement of Revenues. Exoenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30, 1995 2.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1995 and the statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1995. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None given. r:~minutes.rda\O12396 -1- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by. Agency Member Lindemans to adjourn at 7:41 PM to a meeting on February 13, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk ATTEST: Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk r:\minutes.rda\O 12396 -2- ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Senior Planner .~4JI February 13, 1996 Temecula ONE RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. BACKGROUND: In an effort to implement the General Plan Housing Element and the Implementation Plan of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, staff has formed a multi-disciplinary approach to implementation of affordable housing and neighborhood revitalization programs. Titled "Temecula ONE" (Operation Neighborhood Enrichment) the program is staffed by the Community Development, Community Services, Police and City Manager Departments. Three neighborhoods have been identified as participants in the program. They are: La Serena, Old Town and the Rancho California/Margarita Corridor. The Temecula One Program will allow the City to pro-actively deal with housing, law enforcement and human services issues in a comprehensive manner. By allocating resources today, the City will be able not only to stabilize these target areas, increase property values and positively impact the quality of life for the entire community. Overall Goals for the program include: * Preserve and improve the existing affordable housing stock; * Facilitate the development of new affordable housing resources; Encourage positive community values/standards through active community involvement; * Enhance safety and security of the residential neighborhoods; and Increase access to human services by advising residents of human service resources and bringing service providers closer to the community To better define the goals and objectives of Temecula ONE, the City has contracted with the Resource Group to conduct an in-depth needs assessment survey which will solicit input about R: \HOUS | NG\TONE. CC:$ 2/5/96 1 community needs directly from residents. The Resource Group is currently developing survey questions, which will be reviewed and approved by staff. The survey will be conducted later this month. Based on the results of the survey, staff will revise the Temecula One Goals and Objectives, and bring them back to the Council for formal adoption. The RDA is currently pursuing the acquisition of affordable housing sites and formulating re- use proposals for property to be acquired. The acquisition of targeted properties will not only increase the supply of affordable housing starts, but will also improve neighborhoods by removing blighting conditions through rehabilitation and corrections of structures. The Agency will also be providing rehabilitation assistance programs as contained in the current Capitol Improvement Program, In early March, the Police Department's Problem Oriented Policing Team will begin an outreach program with neighborhood meetings. The POP Team and other Department Representatives will meet with the La Serena neighborhood on March 2, 1996, and the Old Town neighborhood on March 8, 1996. The POP Team is also developing a Property Owner and Landlord Handbook, aimed as a practical guide for efficient property management. The Human Resources program parameters will be defined after the needs assessment survey is completed. The services will be tailored to the specific needs of the residents within the neighborhoods. FISCAL IMPACT: A Program Budget will be included in the mid-year budget review. R:\HOUSING\TONE.CC] 2/5/96 ITEM 3 APPROVAL 'CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Redevelopment Agency Members Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director February 13, 1996 Rancho West Apartments Proposed Tax-Exempt Financing PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency: 1. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE ACQUISITION BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITION OF A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT AND RELATED FACILITIES 2. Appoint Jones, Hall, Hill & White as Bond Counsel for the issue; Direct staff to prepare documents acceptable to the Executive Director, Redevelopment Agency Attorney, and Bond Counsel to effectuate the sale of bonds to finance the purchase of Rancho West Apartments. BACKGROUND: On August 8, 1995, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the purchase of Rancho West Apartments from the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) and assigned the purchase to Coachella Valley Housing Coalition (CVHC), a nonprofit corporation who will own and operate the property as an affordable housing project. (See attached Redevelopment Agency Report). A:IBRADLEYlRANCHO. WST 1 02/06/96 AGENDA REPORT: Page 2 RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS Subsequently, CVHC sought long term financing for the project from RTC. However the RTC interest rate of 11.25% is extremely unfavorable as compared to estimated tax-exempt rates of 6-1/2% to 7%. In order to gain access to tax-exempt financing, CVHC has obtained agreement from the Bank of America to purchase a tax-exempt bond which would be issued by the Redevelopment Agency on behalf of CVHC. This tax-exempt financing mechanism has been used by many redevelopment agencies in California as a means of assisting nonprofit corporations such as CVHC to develop housing to fulfill redevelopment agency affordable housing requirements. The proposed bond issue is a mortgage revenue bond secured solely by the real estate and repaid by rental income. The Redevelopment Agency is the issuer of the bond, but will have no responsibility to secure the credit or repay the bonded indebtedness. The Redevelopment Agency will act solely as the conduit between Bank of America and CVHC in order to provide this qualified affordable housing project with a tax- exempt interest rate mortgage. All issuance costs, including Bond Counsel fees, will be paid by CVHC from acquisition funds previously authorized for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: August 8, 1995 City Council Report A:IBR,,4DLEYlR,4NCHO. WST 2 02/06/96 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE ACQUISITION BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITION OF A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT AND RELATED FACILITIES WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the "Agency") is authorized to issue bonds pursuant to the provisions of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Law") for the purpose of providing financing for the acquisition of multi-family residential rental projects; and' WHEREAS, the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition, a California non-profit corporation CCVHC") has requested that the Agency issue and sell its revenue bonds (the "Bonds") pursuant to the procedures specified in the Law for the purpose of making a loan to CVHC to finance the acquisition of a 150-unit multi-family residential rental project and related and appurtenant facilities (the "Project"), located 42200 Main Street (APN No. 922-061-021) in the City of Temecula, and the Agency wishes to induce CVHC to acquire the Project; and WHEREAS, United States Income Tax Regulations section 1. 103-18 provides generally that proceeds for tax-exempt debt are not deemed to be expended when such proceeds are used for reimbursement of expenditures made prior to the date of issuance of such debt unless certain procedures are followed, among which is a requirement that (with certain exceptions), prior to the payment of any such expenditure, the issuer must declare an intention. to reimburse such expenditure; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest, for the public benefit and in furtherance of the public purposes of the Agency that the Agency declare its official intent to reimb~rse the expenditures referenced herein from the proceeds of the BondS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Governing Board of the Redevelopmerit Agency of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. The Agency declares its intent to issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the procedures specified in the Law in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $2,500,000 for the purposes of providing financing for the acquisition of the Project. Section 2. The issuance and sale of the Bonds shall be upon such terms and conditions as may be mutually agreed upon by the Agency, CVHC and the purchaser of said Bonds, and shall be authorized by resolution of the Agency at a meeting duly held and conducted for such purpose. Section 3. The Agency hereby declares that it reasonably expects that a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds will be used for reimbursement of expenditures for the acquisition of the Project that are paid before the date of initial execution and delivery of the Bonds. Section 4. The maximum amount of proceeds of the Bonds to be used for reimbursement of expenditures for the construction and development of the Project that are paid before the date of initial execution and delivery of the Bonds is $2,500,000. Section 5. The foregoing declaration is consistent with the budgetary and financial circumstances of the Agency in that there are no funds (other than proceeds of the Bonds) that are reasonably expected to be (i) reserved, (ii) allocated or (iii) otherwise set aside, on a long- term basis, by or on'behalf of the Agency, or any public entity controlled by the Agency, for the expenditures for the acquisition of the Project that are expected to be reimbursed from the proceeds of the Bonds. Section 6. The Agency hereby finds that the issuance of the Bonds is a substantial inducement to CVHC to acquire the Project. Section 7. CVHC shall be responsible for the payment of all present and future costs in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, any fees and expenses incurred by the Agency in anticipation of the issuance of the Bonds, the costs of printing any necessary disclosure materials relating to the Bonds, bond counsel fees and expenses, financial advisor fees and costs, trustee fees and expenses, and any costs of printing the Bonds. Section 8. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate (i) the Agency to provide financing to CVHC for the acquisition of the project or to issue the Bonds for purposes of such financing; or (ii) the Agency, the City of Temecula (the "City"), the Planning Department of the City or any other department of the City to approve any application or request for, or take any other action in connection with, any permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, repair, rehabilitation or operation of the Project. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, Agency Secretary/City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 96- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: June S. Greek, Agency Secretary/City Clerk ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENCY REPORT To: From: Datez Subject: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager February 13, 1996 Comparison of Current Loan Programs Prepared by: Don Hillberg Recommendation: That the City Council review the Redevelopment Agency Loan Program and criteria and provide direction to staff concerning the program. Discussion: The purpose of this analysis is to provide a comparison of various loan programs available to small businesses in the City of Temecula and to point out any gaps in available funding. Small Business Administration The Small Business Administration was created in 1953 as an independent agency of the federal government to assist the small business concerns in this country. It has established financial assistance programs to meet the needs of the small business person as well as the handicapped, women owned businesses, export/international trade loans and Native American Affairs to name just 'a few. The SBA administers their lending programs through approved lending institutions throughout the country. The local institutions contacted all have similar programs offered under their SBA programs. (See exhibit 1 for a comparison of the City's RDA program as compared to the SBA and CalCAP). These lenders also have lending programs that they offer to small business outside of the SBA umbrella. California Capital Access "CalCAP" Launched in March 1994 by the state of California, CalCAP is a loan insurance program that partners banks with the state. Its mission is to extend higher than normal risk loans to business owners who may not qualify for conventional financing. To qualify an owner must have been in business in California for two years, have good credit and have adequate cash flow based on the most recent years results to meet business obligations plus the new debt payment. Under this program, participating lenders set up reserve funds made up of premiums paid by the state, the lender and the borrower to cover losses from a portfolio of program loans. The state can put up to 4% of the loan balance while the lender and borrower can put up to 2 % each into the reserve fund. What is unique about this program is that the reserve covers losses for loans made by an individual lender and do not just cover losses for a particular loan. Unlike a loan guarantee, this method gives the lender more flexibility in that the whole reserve fund covers any individual loan that may default. Commercial Lenders Commercial banks, banks, thrifts and mortgage brokers can offer the business borrower lines of credit, equipment loans and real estate loans with a wide rage of loan financing options. With these lenders, in most cases the programs are very structured and require the borrower to meet certain criteria and guidelines. The size of the loan is generally larger, the loan to value is generally lower, financial ratios are higher and rates and terms are either those offered to the most credit worthy borrower in the cases of banks or high if the borrower is dealing with a thrift. The philosophy of the commercial lender is that they are looking for the best borrower for the type of loan they are offering. Redevelopment Agency The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula established a program to offer small business loans to businesses within the City's Redevelopment Project Area. Currently, loan funds can be used to buy, construct, expand or convert' commercial buildings or finance machinery, fixtures and capital equipment. What makes this program unique is that it is only eligible to businesses in the city that have been turned down for financing by a SBA lender. It is a program designed to assist business borrowers that do not meet other lending institutions criteria. Examples for rejection might be the time a business has been operating, past credit problems either personal or business or the type of property or equipment to be secured does not meet the lending guidelines. The criteria for eligibility in the RDA Loan Program is as follows: Maximum loan request not to exceed $100,000, the business must be located within the City's Redevelopment Project Area, be organized for profit, demonstrate the ability to repay the loan from business cash flow, display the necessary knowledge to operate the business profitably and a written decline letter from a SBA area lender. Although the RDA has been termed the "lender of last resort" and past experience has shown that it cannot fund every loan request, it can help the small business that "falls between the cracks." The RDA does not market this program, however during the past year, staff has sent out flyers to thirty-eight prospective borrowers and loan applications to sixteen. In all of the programs outlined there are similarities and it would appear that they should be able to meet the lending needs of the business community. But in reality, there are some loans that do not meet the guidelines of the commercial lender, the Small Business Administration or the other government sponsored loan programs. However, when looked at are still viable Ioans~ These are the ones that "fall between the cracks." Credit, cash flow, debt ratio, net worth are just some of the reasons other lenders might reject a particular loan. In some instances, these loans can be structured to meet the RDA guidelines and assist the business in obtaining financing. The gap that the RDA can fill is the borrower who has not been able to meet other lenders criteria, however can demonstrate that they can meet the criteria of eligibility for the RDA. Enclosures: Comparison of Programs (Exhibit 1) Small Business Administration Loan Program California Capital Access Program "CalCAP" Commercial Lenders RDA Activity Report RDA Funded Loan Report Comparison of Redevelopment Programs City of Temecula RDA Loan Program 3 I! Exhibit No. 1 Interest Rate Equipment Real Estate Term Equipment Real Estate Loan Amount Owner Occupied Debt to Net Worth Debt Coverage Ratio Personal Guarantees Insurance (hazard) Appraisals Loan to Value Equipment Real Estate RDA Fixed at Prime 5 years 20 years $100,000 Yes 4:1 1: 1 or better As Required Yes Used Equipment Real Estate 100% SBA Prime plus 7-10 years 25 years $2 million Yes 4:1 1.2: 1 or better As Required Yes Real Estate 75 to 80% 90% CalCAP Prime plus Fixed 7-10 years 25 years $2 Million Yes 4:1 1.25:1 or better As Required Yes Real Estate 75 to 100% 75% 4 PROGRAM 7(a) Guanntee Program 502 Local Development Company Programs 504 Certi~ed Development Company Prognms SBA LOAN PROGRAM FUNCTION CUSTOMER The program is designed m pwmote small business formation and growth by guaranteerag long term loans m qualified firms. Loans are available for many business purposes ie: real estate, expansion, equipment, working capital or inventory. SBA can guarantee up to $500,000.00-70% m 90% LTV. Small Businesses The 502 loan program targets long-term, fixed asset financing to total gas. Small Businesses The 504 loan pmgta. m provides certified development compames (CDC) m small businesses m acquire real estate, machinex~ and equipment, for expansion or modernizaaon of facilities. Typically 504 loan proceeds are provided as follows: 50% by an unguatant~t bank loan, 40% by a SBA guaranteed debenture and 10% by the small business customer. The maximum SBA debenture is $1 million. Smsll businesses DELIVERY THROUGH Comlnetcinl lending institotiom Certified development CODlp~eS (CDC) through COD~!]~CfCinl ien~ng ~a,S~tUdODS Debentures through ccrl~ed development companies (privam nonprofit corporations set up to conU'ibute to the economic development of or region TERMS up to prime plus 2.75. 10 year term for working capital / 25 years for f'uted assets. 2% fee. not available Not available PROGRAM Lines of Credit Equipment (FF&E) Real Estate CAIJFORNIA CAPITAL ACCESS PROGRAM "CalCAP" FUNCTION CUSTOMER This pwgnm is designed to encourage California financial instimtious to make loans which are somewhat riskier than conventional loans. Under this program, participating lenders set up special reserve funds made up of premiums paid by the Authority, the lender and the borrower to cover losses from a portfolio of program loans. Each participating lender has its own reserve account. The Authority can put in up to 4 % of the loan balance as reserves against losses except when the portfolio is new that percentage can be increased to 150% of maximum or 6%. The lender and the borrower can each contribute up to 2% of the loan mount Small Businesses Sumall Business Most important, the Program is designed to use a small mount of public resources to generate large mounts of private lending, thus allowing lenders to reach a significant number of businesses which otherwise would not have access to capital. Small Business Prime plus 2.0 to 4.0. One month to 18 months term. Debt coverage ratio of lwl. Prime plus 2.0 to 4.0. One to 5 year term. Debt coverage ratio of Itol Prime plus 2.0 to 4.0. Balloon payment mort. 25 yrs due in 10 to 15 yrs. 6 PROGRAM Lines of credit Equipment loans No direct real estate lending program PROGRAM New Equipment Used Equipmere Real Estate COMMERCIAL LENDERS Bank of Commerce FUNCTION To meet the needs for shotz term working capital. One year wHover provision and 30 day out of dcpt per year. To guarantee conlinued gwwth of small to mid sized businesses. with the ability to replace depreciated assets and purdmse new equipment and vehicles All loans secured by real estate are funded ~u'ough a 5BA loan program. 1st PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK FUNCTION Provide funds for small to medium size businesses for expansion of facilities and equipment purchase. The bank wffi look at all types of commercial real estate including office buildings, warehouses, small commercial, gas stations and restaurant. CUSTOMER Stnall Businesses Small Businesses n/'a CUSTOMER Small Business Small Business Small Business RATE/ TERMS Prime plus 1.5 to 2.0..05 fee 1 yr roHover Prime plus 3,0 to3.5. 48to 60 month term. RATE/ TERM Base rate pins 1.0 Max term is 36 mo. Lendupto 75-80% of new price. Base rote plus 1.5%. Lendupto 75-80% of used value per appraisal. Base plus 2.0. Term set per type of property. PROGRAM New F_xluipment Used Equipment Re~l Estate North County Bank FUNCTION Provide funds for small to medium size businesses. Loan limit from $200,000 to $1 million. Loan on furniture, fixtures and equipment. Maximum loan mount not to exceed $200,000. Documentation fee(rain $100.00) To purchasc or build commercial real estate. Loan amount not w exceed $500,000. LTV can vary depending on propew/. CUSTOMER Small Business Small Business Small Business 9% to I0%. 1 yr Rollover. Fees (varies) Fixed rote. Rate and term varies. Term not to exceed life of equipment. Balloon payment. Fixed and variable rate programs. 7 Month January February March April May June July August September October November December RDA Activity Report Numbers Only Flyers Mailed 9 2 6 3 5 3 3 2 1 2 0 2 Applications Mailed 2 0 2 1 2 3 1 2 0 1 0 2 Totals 9/2 11/2 17/4 20/15 25/7 28/10 31/11 33/13 34/13 36/14 36/14 38/16 CITY C!aren~ont Santa Ana Brea Ontario COMPARISON OF REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS TYPE Small Business Assistance RATE/ LOAN ALLOWABLE TERM AMOUNT IMPROVEMENTS Not stated To $100,000 Direct 25 yrs due in $20,000 to Commercial 10 $100,000 Rehabilitation Prime minus Loan Program (-) 2 504 Debenture Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program Center City Commercial Rehabilitation Pmgram 10 to 20 yrs Rate not stated To $1.875M 20 yrs To $75,000 6% 50% Matching funds 10 yrs Prime minus (-) 4 (not to exceed 5 % or below 3%) $15,000 to $150,000 Exterior or interior improvements Exterior Improvements Purchase or remodel of existing buildings, new consauction Exterior remodeling, common space upgradmg, parking improvement Exterior and interior improvements REQUIREMENTS RF_,VrRI~ONS Must demonsu-ate that borrower has been turned down by another lender-in Redevelopmere Zone Must be within designated am Improvements to commercial buildings in designated project areas Building must exist in Center City Redevelopment Project Area 10 I (! City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Small Business Loan Program To be eligible for this program, you and your business must meet the requirements listed below, If in fact you meet these requirements, the term of the loan would be for a minimum of 5 years, amortized over the life of new equipment financed, and not to exceed the life of the lease for tenants improvements. If the loan is for real estate improvements, the term may be extended to 20 years. These funds are to be used to construct, expand, or convert commercial buildings and structures or to finance manufacturing machinery, fixtures, and capital equipment. The maximum loan amount is $100,000, and the rate is fixed at prime (locked in at time of City Council approval). Reauirements for Eliaibilitv 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Your business must be organized for profit. New business ventures must contribute at least 30% cash to the total ' project cost. Existing businesses must not exceed a 4:1 debt to equity ratio including the payment of the new loan. You must establish that you have or can obtain the necessary knowledge to operate the business profitably. You must establish the marketability of your product or service. You must show and support the ability to repay the loan from the business cash flow. You must have been previously declined and provide a declination letter from a SBA lender. The loan must be secured with collateral equal to 100% of the loan amount. You will be required to pay a $250.00 processing fee, plus actual costs such as LJCC fees, title and appraisal, credit report, recording, etc. These fees may be paid in cash by the borrower or out of the loan proceeds at the time of closing. 11 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLDTOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY HELD JANUARY 9, 1996 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 7:54 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. 4 BOARD MEMBERS: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: PRESENT: ABSENT: Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR Board Member Stone announced an abstention. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberrs to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Minutes 1.1 1.2 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone Approve the minutes of December 12, 1995. Approve the minutes of December 19, 1995. Mi nu tes .fa\0 10 9 9 6 - 1 - ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberrs to adjourn at 7:55 PM to a meeting on February 13, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary Minutes.fa\010996 -2- ITEM 2 DIR. OF FINAN~ CITY MANAGER OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Authority Members Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager February 13, 1996 Financings for .Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass .Corridor RECOMMENDATION: That the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopt the resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AMENDING RESOLUTIONS OF INTENTION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LAND WITHIN THE PROPOSED DISTRICT, AUTHORIZE THE FINANCING OF ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS, APPROVE A REVISED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES, AND INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE DISTRICT BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1995, the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted two resolutions (the "Resolutions of Intention") relative to its intention to establish a Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"). The resolutions made reference to the proposed boundaries of the District as set forth on a map on file with the Secretary of the Authority. On October 10, 1995, the Authority adopted a resolution adding territory to the District which included the land proposed for the construction of a new arena. On September 12, 1995, the Authority also .adopted resolutions of intention to form a Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) to finance the Western Bypass improvements in the event that an assessment district for such improvements could not be formed. The City has undertaken proceedings to form the assessment district; however, it now appears that only the parcels intended to be included within the District will be assessed for the Western Bypass improvements, and the Redevelopment Agency will contribute funds to pay for construction of improvements in lieu of assessments on .other property owners. R: tNOR TONL tAGENDASIRNRESO. AGN 02/05/96 In light of the foregoing, the landowners within the District have requested that the Authority expand the scope of the District to include both the Old Town area improvements and the Western Bypass improvements, to add additional territory to the District, to raise the authorized indebtedness of the District and to approve a revised rate and method of apportionment for the District. Adoption of the resolution will accommodate this request, and allow for the completion of the Old Town area improvements and the Western Bypass improvements by means of a single financing district, thereby reducing the complexity of the original financing plan, reducing City administrative expenses in connection with the financing of these improvements, and otherwise allowing for a simpler marketing plan for the proposed bond issue. The resolution listed above amends the Resolutions of Intention to include within the proposed boundaries of the District additional land that would otherwise have been assessed for the Western Bypass improvements, and directs the Secretary to record a second amended boundary map in connection therewith. The resolution also amends the Resolutions of Intention to add the Western Bypass as an eligible improvement to be financed by the District, and amends the special tax formula and the bonded indebtedness limit for the District to accommodate the financing of those improvements. Finally, the date of the public hearings called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intentions has also been amended to March 26, 1996, and the Secretary has been directed to publish a notice of revised public hearing date. Attachment: Resolution R:INORTONL LAGENDASIFINRESO.AGN 02/05/96 RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITW_S DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AIVfENDING RESOLUTIONS OF INTENTION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLI) TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LAND WITHIN THE PROPOSED DISTRICT, AUTHORIZE THE FINANCING OF ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS, APPROVE A REVISED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES, AND INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE DISTRICT WHEREAS, On September 12, 1995, the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted its Resolution No. FA 95-02 and FA 95-03 (collectively, the "Initial Resolution") expressing the intention of the Board of Directors of the Authority to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), to levy a special tax within the District to pay the costs of certain public improvements identified therein (the "Public Improvements"), and to issue bonded indebtedness to finance such costs; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. FA 95-02 approved a proposed boundary map for the District in the form on file with the Secretary (the "Original Map"), and the boundaries of the District referred to in the Initial Resolution were as set forth on the Original Map; and WHEREAS, On October 10, 1995, the Authority adopted its Resolution No. FA 95- 06 amending the proposed boundaries of the District to include additional territory, and on December 12, 1995, the Authority adopted a Resolution making a finding that additional time was required in order to complete the public hearings called pursuant to the Initial Resolutions, and continuing said public hearings to January 9, 1996; and WHEREAS, On January 10, 1996, this Board of Directors further continued the public hearings called. pursuant to the Initial Resolutions to February 13, 1996; and WHEREAS, the proponents of the District have now requested that additional territory be added to the boundaries of the District, the District be authorized to finance additional improvements, the proposed rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District be revised, and the amount of bonded indebtedness that the District can incur be increased, all as further set forth below; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to amend the Initial Resolutions as requested by the proponents of the District and set forth below, to set a new date for the public hearings described in the Initial Resolutions and to direct publication of a revised notice of public hearing in the form herein approved. Rcsos 94 I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. The proposed boundaries of the District are hereby mended to include all of the land indicated on the Second Amended Map of the District on file with the Secretary, which boundaries are hereby preliminarily approved and to which map reference is hereby made for further particulars. The Secretary is hereby directed to record, or cause to be recorded, said Second Amended Map of the boundaries of the District in the office of the County Recorder within fifteen (15) days of the dam of adoption of this Resolution, but in any event at least fifteen days prior to the public heating referred to in Section 6 below. 2. The Initial Resolutions are here amended to reflect that the proposed boundaries of the District are as set forth in the Second Amended Map of the District referred to in Section 1 above. 3. The description of the Public Improvements proposed to be financed by the District, as set forth in Exhibit A to Resolution No. FA 95-02, are hereby amended to include the following: (a) Construction of a new roadway as a four (4) lane divided roadway from near the Front Street/Highway 79 South intersection, to Vincent Moraga Drive, a distance of approximately 5,600 feet. Vincent Moraga Drive, a four (4) lane undivided roadway, will be constructed from this intersection, northerly, to join existing Vincent Moraga Drive, approximately 1,200 feet. Roadway grading will be completed for the future extension of the Western Bypass Corridor approximately 3,400 feet from Vincent Moraga Drive to join Rancho California Road. The work will include, but not be limited to, the following; (i) acquisition of necessary right-of-way, (ii) construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and Rancho California Road, (iii) construction of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, (iv) construction of roadway between the curbs, consisting of an approximately 78- foot wide roadway with an approximately 12-foot wide raised median island, (v) installation of landscaping and irrigation, (vi) installation of water system facilities, (vii) installation of sanitary sewer system, (viii) installation of street lighting system, (ix) construction and/or installation of any facilities or appurtenances incident to any of the foregoing, (x) costs of engineering, design, acquisition of land and/or public easements, planning, insurance, legal and accounting expenses and coordination related to the above-listed facilities; and (b) The elimination of any fixed special assessment liens imposed on any property located in the District pursuant to assessment proceedings to finance all or any portion of the improvements described in the preceding clause (a). 4. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the District, as set forth in Exhibit B to Resolution No., FA 95-02, is hereby amended in its entirety to be as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 5. By reason of the additional Public Improvements described in Section 3 above, the amount required for financing of the portion of the costs of the Public Improvements to be financed by the District has increased by up to $10,000,000, such that it is necessary to increase the maximum bonded indebtedness for the District from $12,500,000 (as referenced in Section 6 of Resolution No. FA 95-02, and Sections 1 and 2 of Resolution No. FA 95-03) Resos 94 2 to $27,500,000. Accordingly, the Initial Resolutions are hereby amended by deleting therefrom, in each place it appears in the Initial Resolutions, "$12,500,000,* and by inserting therein, in lieu thereof, "$27,500,000." 6. The Secretary is hereby directed to publish a notice of a revised date for the public heating referred to in Section 10 of Resolution No. FA 95-02 and Section 4 of Resolution No. FA 95-03, said notice of the revised date to be given by publication one time in a newspaper of general circulation circulated within the District. The Publication of said notice shall be completed as soon as practicable, but in any event at least seven ('7) days before March 26, 1996, which is hereby designated as the revised date set for said public hearings. Said notice shall substantially be in the form of Exhibit A hereto.' 7. Except as amended pursuant to this Resolution and Resolution No. FA 95-06, the provisions of Resolution Nos. FA 95.02 and FA 95.03 are hereby ratified and confirmed. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996. ATTEST: Patricia H. Bridsall, Chairperson June S. Greek, Authority Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] R~sos ~4 :~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, Agency Secretary/City Clerk Resos 94 4 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Notice is hereby given that on February 13, 1996 the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted a Resolution (the "Amending Resolution") approving a second revised boundary map for its proposed Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), authorizing the financing of additional facilities by the District, approving a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District and increasing the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District, and otherwise amending its Resolution Nos. FA 95-02 and FA 95-03 relating to the District previously adopted by the Board of Directors on September 12, 1995. The Amending Resolution changed the date of the public hearings called pursuant to Resolutions Nos. FA 95-02 and FA 95-03 from October 17, 1995 to March 26, 1996. Accordingly, March 26, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where the Board of Directors of the Authority, as legislative body for the District, will conduct public hearings on the establishment of the District and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the information of the District, the levy of special tax as therein and the issuance of bonded indebtedness therefore. At said hearings, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against the establishment of the District, the extent of the Distxict, the furnishings of the specified types of facilities to be financed by the District and the issuance of bonds for the District will be heard. Any person interested may file a protest in writing as provided in Section 53323 of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. If fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be included in the District (as said territory is set forth in the revised boundary map for the District approved pursuant to the Amending Resolution), or the owners of one- half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be included in the District (as said territory is set forth in the revised boundary map for the District approved pursuant to the Amending Resolution) and not exempt from the special tax, ffie written protests against the establishment of the District or the issuance of bonds therefore and the protests are not withdrawn to reduce the value of the protests to less than a majority, the Board of Directors shall take no further action to create the District or levy the special taxes or issue such debt for a period of one year from the date of decision of the Board of Directors, and if the majority protests of the registered voters or landowners are only against the furnishing of a Resos 94 5 type or types of facilities within the District, or against levying a specified special tax, those types of facilities or the specified special tax will be eliminated from the proceedings to form the District. (~ Copies of the foregoing resolutions are available for inspection in the office of the ~ity Clerk of the City of Temecula. Dated: ,1996 June S. Greek, Authority Secretary/City Clerk Resos 94 6 EXHIBIT B RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) A special tax shall be levied on each Parcel of land within the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the Responsible Party of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") through the application of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by law or the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. It is intended that all special taxes applicable to Parcels be collected in the same manner and at the same time 'as ordinary ad valorem properly taxes, and that special taxes so levied will be subject to the same penalties and procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes, subject to any covenant for judicial forec!osure with respect thereto in any Fiscal Agent Agreement for any Bonds of the Authority for the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority may collect the special taxes at such other times or in such other manner as necessary or convenient to satisfy the obligations of the District. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX The maximum special tax that may be levied in the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 On any Parcel shall not exceed the sum of: plus (i) (ii) The maximum building special tax rate of $17. O0 per building square foot, multiplied times the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the Parcel; The maximum land special tax rate of $15.00 per land square foot, multiplied times the Land Area of the Parcel. The special tax shall be levied annually. The maximum building special tax and the maximum land special tax shall increase each Fiscal Year from the maximum special tax for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 by 2%, compounded annually. A Parcel shall be subject to the maximum special tax for not more than 40 years. In no event shall the maximum special tax on any Parcel used for private residential purposes exceed any limitation imposed under Section 53321 of the California Government Code. ..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B1 ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES; LEVY ANNUAL TAX CATEGORIES On or about July 1 of each year, but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the special taxes on the County's secured tax roll, the Responsible Party shall determine for each Parcel within the District, whether or not such Parcel is Taxable Properly. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the County Assessor as of the March 1 preceding such July 1. LEVY The Responsible Party shall then determine the estimated aggregate Special Tax Liability for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1, and levy on each Parcel which is Taxable Property, as follows: Step 1 Determine the Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable Property, and the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property in the District. Step 2: Calculate the annual building tax rate by dividing an amount equal to 85% of the Special Tax Liability, by the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 3: Multiply the total Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable Property by the lesser of: Or (i) (ii) the annual building tax rate; the maximum building special tax rate for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 4: Determine the Land Area for each Parcel of Taxable Property in the District and the total Land Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property in the District. Step 5: Calculate the annual land tax rate as the lesser of: Or (i) (ii) (the sum of the Special Tax Liability less the total of the funds generated for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property under Step 3 above), divided by the total Land Area (by square footage) for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property; the maximum land special tax for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. ..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B2 Step 6: Multiply the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property by the annual land tax rate determined under Step 5. Step 7: Calculate the sum of the building tax (from Step 3) and the land tax (from Step 6) for each Parcel which is Taxable Property. PREPAYMENTS Special tax prepayments may be made for property subject to the levy of the special taxes. A particular Parcel may prepay the special tax, provided that all authorized Bonds that are to be issued, have been issued. Any property owner in the District that desires to prepay the annual special taxes on a particular Parcel shall notify the RespOnsible Party in writing of such intention not less than 90 days prior to an interest payment date and the prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to such interest payment. The following must be applied for a prepayment of a particular Parcel: a, The prepayment amount for a particular Parcel shall be calculated by the Responsible Party, as follows: Compute the special tax for such Parcel by the total special tax for the then current Fiscal Year. The prepayment amount is computed by dividing the special tax for the Parcel by the total special tax for all properties for the then current Fiscal Year within the District, and multiplying the results by the principal amount of any outstanding Bonds. The result shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000); provided however, that if the Authority is provided with prepayments of special tax for more than one Parcel at the same time, then the total prepayments shall be aggregated and the aggregated prepayment amount shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000). The prepayment amount calculated in (2) above for a particular Parcel will be (a) increased in the amount of: (i) applicable redemption premium, if any, on the' Bonds; (ii) an amount determined by the Responsible Party to offset any difference between the amount needed to pay debt service on the Bonds and the amount derived from the reinvestment of the prepaid special tax pending the redemption of such Bonds; and (iii) amount determined by the Responsible Party to pay for the applicable Administrative Expenses to provide such prepayment; and (b) decreased for any reduction in Bond reserves due to the prepayment. Determination of the total amount needed by the Responsible Party shall be conclusive, absent manifest error. ..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B3 The Parcel with respect to which prepayment is made must not be delinquent in any payment of special taxes previously levied within the District. Prepayment shall not relieve any property owner from paying those special taxes which have already become due and payable, and a Notice of Cessation of Special Tax Lien shall not be recorded against any Parcel pursuant to California Government Code Section 53344, until all special taxes with respect to that Parcel have been paid. DEFINITIONS Administrative Expenses means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the Fiscal Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the Authority and the City in carrying out their respective duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of their respective counsel, any fees of the County related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of the Authority and the City staff directly related thereto and a proportionate amount of Authority and the City general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority or the City, respectively, from its own funds with respect to the District or the Bonds, and all other costs and expenses of the Authority, the City or the Fiscal Agent incurred in connection with the discharge of their respective duties under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and, in the case of the Authority and the City, in any way related to administration of the District. Authority means the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. Bonds means any bonds of the Authority issued for the District under Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, authorized to be issued under the Resolution of Issuance. Building Floor Area means the area included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building, including each floor of multiple story buildings, exclusive of vent shafts and courts (defined here as open and unobstructed to the sky). The Building Floor Area will be determined by the Responsible Party by reference to City or County approved building plans or other such documentation as the Responsible Party shall determine. City means the City of Temecula. County means the County of Riverside. Debt Service, for each Fiscal Year, is the total annual principal and interest payable on the Bonds during the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year, less any capitalized interest and any other amounts remaining in the bond fund held under the Fiscal Agent Agreement as of the end of the previous Fiscal Year available to make such payments. ..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B4 District means the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements). Fiscal Agent means the Fiscal Agent designated under the Fiscal Agent Agreement. Fiscal Agent Agreement means the agreement by that name approved by the Resolution of Issuance, and as it may be amended and/or supplemented from time to time. Fiscal Year means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30. Land Area means the measure of land area of a Parcel, in square feet of land, rounded up to the nearest whole integer. Parcel means any County Assessor's parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District based on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Resolution of Issuance is any Resolution adopted by the Authority authorizing the issuance of Bonds. Responsible Party is any person or persons who the Authority may appoint from time to time to compute the leW of the special taxes within the District. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount sufficient to pay Debt Service for such Fiscal Year, Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year, an amount necessary, as determined by the Responsible Party, to offset projected tax delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year based on prior Fiscal Year delinquencies and to otherwise replenish any reserve fund established for the Bonds, and all payments required to be made in the applicable Fiscal Year under the Fiscal Agent Agreement for the Bonds and any supplements thereto. Taxable Property shall mean all real property within the boundaries of the District that is owned in fee by T.Z.B.G., Inc. or BFD/OTEP, a California corporation, at any time between the adoption of the resolution of formation for the District and the date that is one year after the adoption of the resolution of formation, provided however, that the following property shall be exempt from the special tax (i) any real property that is exempt from taxation by law, (ii) any acres of land owned, conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to and accepted by a public agency, including but not limited to, the federal government, the State of California and any local governmental agency, and (iii) land which is a public right-of-way or which is an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement. ..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B5 I! OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY HELD JANUARY 9, 1996 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 7:55 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 4 ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall BOARD MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given, CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberts to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Minutes 1.1 1.2 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None I BOARD MEMBERS: Stone Approve the minutes of December 12, 1995. Approve the minutes of December 19, 1995. Minutes.otwa\010996 -1 - ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Stone, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn at 7:56 PM to a meeting on February 13, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary Minutes.otwa\O10996 -2- ITEM 27 APPROV/~/Z~~ CITY ATTORNEY (! CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: · City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director February 13, 1996 Planning Application No. PA95-0113- Deletion of Conditions of Approval and Release of Bonds for Parcel Map 23969 Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0113 TO DELETE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP 23969 KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-0'?., 045, 046,047, & 048 and e Delete Conditions of Approval No. 21,22 and 23 for Parcel Map No. 23969; and 3. Release - Bond No. 117 40 76 for Labor and Materials and Faithful Performance; and 4. Release - Bond No. 117 40 78 for Subdivision Warranty BACKGROUND Parcel Map 23969 was originally submitted to the County of Riverside in 1989 and transferred to the City of Temecula upon incorporation. On September 25, 1990, the Temecula City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map 23969. The project approval contained conditions of approval that required the improvement of Pujol Street adjacent to the subject project. Bonds were provided to the City by then property owner Omdahl Enterprises for the necessary improvements and the map was subsequently recorded in February of 1991. R:\STAFF'RFl~l13PA95.CC 2/5/96 ctlr On November 1, 1995, the current property owner filed an application with the City seeking a waiver of the conditions to improve Pujol Street. The deletion of the conditions will provide for the release of the related improvement bonds. On November 30, 1995, a Planning Director Hearing was held on the request to delete said conditions of approval. At that meeting, the Director approved the applicant's request. However, subsequent to the hearing, it was determined that the City Council, and not the Planning Director, was the appropriate hearing body for an amendment to a final map. Thus, this item, plus the release of bonds .have been noticed for a public hearing before the City Council. DISCUSSION Typically, staff will condition a project to provide improvements to adjacent streets. Conditions of approval for Parcel Map 23969 included the improvement of Pujol Street and prohibiting the project from using Pujol to access the site. In addition to the conditions, there is an approximate 25 foot grade separation between the site and Pujol Street that physically prohibits the site from accessing Pujol Street. Because no access is proposed or necessary for the subdivision, staff supports the applicant's contention that there is no nexus between the condition to improve Pujol Street and the approval of the map. Pujol Street is a dead-end street and the improvement of which provides no benefit to the subject property. Should the Council delete said conditions, the necessity of the bonds is removed and can thus be released. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Resolution No 96- - Page No. 3 Vicinity Map - Page No. 7 Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map 23.969 - Page No. 9 Minutes from the August 20, 1990 Planning Commission Meeting - Page No. 10 Minutes from the September 17, 1990 City Council Meeting - Page No. 11 Minutes from the September 25, 1990 City Council Meeting - Page No. 12 R:~STAFTRFI~l13PA95.CC 215196 cdr 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- R:\STAFPRI~II3PA95.C~ 1/25/96 ATTACHMENT NO. I 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0113 TO DELETE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP 23969 KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-044, 045, 046,047, & 048 WHEREAS, First Pacific National Bank filed Planning Application No. PA 95-0113 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0113 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved Tentative Parcel Map 23969 on September 25, 1990 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findines. A. The City Council in approving Planning Application No. PA95-0113, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. That the conditions of approval to improve Pujol Street, which are proposed to be deleted, do not provide a direct benefit to the property owner of record. 2. That the conditions of approval to improve Pujol Street, that are proposed to be deleted, would not typically be required by the City of Temecula. 3. That the proposal to delete said conditions of approval would not create a situation that would be inconsistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula. 4. That the proposal to delete said conditions of approval is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 5. That the proposal to delete said conditions of approval is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6. That the proposal to delete said conditions of approval is not likely to cause conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that R:\STAFFRPTXI13PA95.CC 1125196 cdr 4 alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, Planning Application No. proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. · 8S Section 2. Environmental Comoliance. An Initial Environmental Assessment was prepared for this project and it was determined that the project would have no effect on the environment and was therefore exempt from requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061 (3). Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. PA95-0113 to delete condition of approval No. 21,22, and 23 for Parcel Map 23969 on property known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 940-310-044, 045,046, 047,048. A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:~STAI~RPT~II3PA95.CC I/2,~/96 ~ 5 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of February, 1996. ATTEST: Karel Lindemans, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of February, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\STAFFRP~l13PA95.CC 1/25196 cdr 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 VICINITY MAP R:~TAFFRPT~lI3PA95.CC 1/4/96 cclr 7 CITY OF TEMECULA ~ / / ./ ' PARC CASE NO. - PA95-0113 CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 9:1996 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~STAPPRPT~II3PA93.CC 1/4/96 odr '[ 0 CITY OF TEM ECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Parcel Map No. 23969 Commission Approval Date: Expiration Date: P1anninq Department The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents. officers, and employees from any claim, action. or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66~99.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not. thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance ~60, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the City Council approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance L~60. The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act, Subdivision .Ordinance q60. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication shail provide for nonexclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. Legal access as required by Ordinance 1~60 shall be provided from the parcel map boundary to a City maintained road. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform Building Code shall be submitted to the City Department of Building and Safety. STFRPT\PM23969. A I The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyotis letter dated April 2. 1990, a copy of which is attached. All items of the letter shall comply except for No. 's 3 and 6. 10. 11. 12. The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department~s transmittal dated May 22, 1989, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with' the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated June 7, 1989, a copy of which is attached. if the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of parcel map. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department"s letter dated March 3, 1990, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Land Use Section~s transmittal dated March 8, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 15. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated July 14, 1989, a copy of which is attached. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan. 16. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittai dated May 16, 1989, a copy of which is attached. 17. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the 5outhem California Edison Company transmittal dated May 24, 1989, a copy of which is attached. 18. Prior to recordation of this map, a reciprocal access agreement shall be recorded for Parcels 2 and 3. 19, 20. Prior to recordation of this map, a signing and striping plan along with a street improvement plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Prior to occupancy, developer shali pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIRINegative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of ST F R PT\ PM23969. A 2 21. the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. Prior to occupancy, Pujoi Street shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter, (on the south side) located 16 feet from centerline with 32 feet of asphalt concrete paving in accordance with Riverside County Standard 106, Section "A" (32'/50). 22. Dedication shall be made on Pujol Street to provide for a full 50 foot right-of- way in accordance with Riverside County Standard 106, Section "A" 132'/50) ,.prior to final map. 23. Prior to occupancy, a Riverside County Standard 810 barricade shall be constructed at the west end of Pujol Street. The applicant shall not be required to construct a sidewalk on Pujol Street adjacent to Parcel Map No. 23969. GRADING: 25. 26. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by City Ordinance or resolution. Grading plans shall conform to the Hillside Development Standards as presented in the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special terracing Ibenching) plan, increased slope ratio (e.g. 3:1), retain walls, and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not ~xceed a 1596 grade. 27. Prior to the issuance of grading and/or building permits, all proposed new structures on parcels shall be limited to slopes less than 26% unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director. 28, All grading and building plans/permits shall reflect the utilization of post and beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split level pads and post and beam foundations when development is proposed on slopes of 15% or greater measured over a horizontal distance of 30 feet. All driveways shall not exceed a 15% average grade. ST F R PT\ PM23969. A 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 29. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Road Department Environmental Health Riverside County Flood Control Fire Department Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Planning Department of Building and Safety. 30. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the I-P zone. 31. All lots created by this land division shall have a minimum area of 20,000 square feet. 32. When lots are crossed by n~ajor public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility easement. 33. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of Ordinance ~60. 34. Prior to recordation of the final map the land divider shall execute a certificate of noncontiguous ownership. 35. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in this subdivision in accordance with the Standards No. I~00 and ~01, except that sidewalk shall not be required on the south side of Pujol Street. PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 36. Prior to the recordat/on of the Final Map, the following condition(s) shall be complied with: The subdivider shall annex Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 into the City of Temecula's Recreation and Parks District. The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with the City of Temecula Recreation and Parks District which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. ~60. The agreement shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the recordat/on of the final map. A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be transmitted to the Planning. Department for review and approval. STFRPT\PM23969. A 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET CONDITIONS: 37. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with th~ City. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Plannin9 Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet. "Surface alteration shall not be allowed in the delineated constraint area without additional archaeological investigation or mitigation as directed by the City of Temecula Planning Department. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory· Light and glare may adversely impact operations at the Observatory. Outdoor lighting shall be from low pressure sodium lamps that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizontal plane passing through the luminare." Indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject property as of the date of recordation of the final map. The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the Riverside County Surveyor. No building permits shall be issued by the City of Temecula for any buiiding in Parce) Map No. 23969 until the developer or the developerrs successors-in-interest or assignees, provides evidence of compliance with the terms of said agreement for the financing of pubiic facilities. STFRPT\PM23969. A 5 AND Riverside County Road Department P.O. Box 1090 Riverside. CA 1213) May 24. 1989 92502 Attn: Subdivision Section: SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23'969 Please b~ advised that the division of the property shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by ~outhern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said ntative parcel map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights. title and interest in and to said easement(s). nor should this letter be construed as a vaiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of costs for relocation of any affected facilities. In the event that the development requires teloration of facil- ities. on the subject property. which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise. the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such teloration and provide Edison with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the teloration. If additional information is required in connection-with the above mentioned subject. please call me at (213) 491-2644. Very truly yours. 18455pmh CC: Riverside County Planning Dept. Markham & Associates ATTN: Patti Nahill I (I March 8, 1990 Riverside County Planning Department Attention= Jeff Adams County, Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside. CA 92501 R! v ~RSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: Parcel Map 23969, Amended Map No. I Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for. all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348. Sincerely, " Vaughn' SaWn Land Use Technician /sn Administration gl 4) 682-8840 · ('71 4) 787-2020 OFFICa= .,,F ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY ~LIRVEYOR h'wl ~. Ternrant ak-'TI~GIDADCOMMD~ONFa&COUNTYSUIVn~R Riverside County Plm'ming C~mmisston 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Ladies and Gentlemen: April 2, 1990 COUN17 ADMEN1STiIATIVE MAII/NG ADDRESS: IIVEILqDF, CALIRDiLNIA 91S02 PM 23969 - Amend #1 Schedule E - Team 5 S~D #9 AP #111-111-111-9 With respect uo the conditions of approval for referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department rec~-.~.ends that the landdivider provide the following street improvements, street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Sta~Ha~is (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or tunacceptability may require the map to be resutmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential pards and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shell be referred to the Road Coonnissioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream proper%ies from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/ or by securing a drainage easenent. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructtons, or encroachments by land fills are allowed'. The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. e The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road C~.~ssioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, ' the provisions of Article XI of Ora~nance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use. of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department. COUNTY IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION · 3-6-90 F~ & ~s .40~0 ~emon ~ ~dte R~e. CA 9250| NAR 0 8 1990 787-6606 PARCEL MA~ 23969 - AMENDED With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department reco=mends the followins fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 5000 GPM and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 2500 GPM for hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants, (6"xA"x2-2{") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with ~o portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet'from a fire hydrant. Applican=/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant tTpes, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and =he local water company with the following certification: "'I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Count7 Fire Dept."' The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. All questions regarding the meaning of the.conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Departmann Plan~er By Kurt Mattwell, Fire Safety Specialist DEPAR'rMENT OF t~EALI'H EIVERS I E COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. : tzi Nabill .. runeheal Healnh Specialist IV PARCEL HAP 23969 - SAN 53 Requirements DATE: v, ay 22, 1989 The Environmental ilealth Services Division has reviewed tile tentative map for this project and cannot make any recommendations until a sanitation letter is filed. Time requirements for a SAN 51 letter are as follows: A satisfactory soils pcrcolntion test to prove tile' project feasible. A clc-',rance Icttcx' From tlsc npprol~rinte California !{egional Water Control r$onrd. 3. Two cop~cs of tisc tentative map. A "will-serve" letter from the agency/agencies servinU parable water. Should the project be served sunit:~r)' sewer service, this Department would need only: A "wi I 1-serve" letter From the nCency/aOencies serving parable water and san' xtar)' sewers. 2. One copy of the tentative map. If the project is to be served water In' existin~ wells, pumps and water tanks, a water supp_ly permit will lie required (contact the Environmental Iicalth Services I)/visio.. l.:ngineering Sect)on at 787-6544). The requircmonts for a water supply permit are as follows: Sati. srnctory ln!~orator)' tests [bncterjoloCica], aFRonit, inorp. nnic. Re,cr:~l ph)-sic:~!. nntl Re,ernl minernl} to prove the water parable. '. . A complete set of plnns sham,drip, all details of the proposed nnd existinl~ water systems: sizes and.types o~r pipe nnd enactrelations slmwinl} that nd~qunte qunntity and pressure ~n, be nm intn ined (Ca 1 ~ rornia Waterworks Stnndards - Cali ro,-.l- Ilcnl th n,d Safety Code nnd California Administrative Code, Title 22). These plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. 1lIB IIARKE"~ II'RI:CT P. O. IOX 10~$ ~HONw (714) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Riverside County Planning Department .County Administrative Center Riverside, California 92501 Attention: Regional Team No. 5 Patti Nahill Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Parcel Map 23969 This is a proposal to divide 21.56 acres into 4 lots in the Temecula area. The site is located at the end of Kathleen Way south of Rancho California Road. Parcels 3 and 4 are proposed to drain to the storm drain located northeast of this site. Parcels 1 and 2 are proposed to drain east of the site. Offsite flows are to be collected in the con- crete ditch in the southern most corner of the site. These pro- posals appear to be consistent with the approved Parcel Map 19626-2. Following are the District's recommendations: This parcel map is located within the limits of the Mur- rieta Creek/Murrieta Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have 'been adopted by the Board. Drainage fees shall be paid as set forth under the provisions of the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area Drainage Plans", amended February 16, 1988: Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road .Commissioner as part of the filing for record of the subdivision final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of the parcel map; or At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re- quired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment of fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Build- ing Director at the time of issuance of a grading permit or building permit for each approved parcel, whichever may be first obtained after the recording of the subdivision final map or parcel map; provided ~Dwever, this option to defer the fees may not be exercised for any parcel where grading or structures have been initiated on the parcel within the prior 3 .year period, or permits for either activity have been issued on that parcel which remain active· Riverside County Planning Department Re: Parcel Map 2969 - 2 - June 7, 1989 Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should. be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, 'Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions'. 3. A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected proper~y owners for the release of concentrated or di- verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for review prior ~o the recordation of the final map. 4. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal- culations should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recorda- tion of the final map. Grading plans should be approved prior ~o issuance of grading permits. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Zully Smith of this office at 714/787-1253. c: Markham and Associates ry ~y yo :s Civil Engineer ZS:seb NN_r'rH i_ E:DWARDS lgg5 kmARKET STREET P.O. IOX ¶033 TEI,Elmt-IONr (714) 78'7'2015 FAX NO. (714) '788-9965 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE:. ~.,ad, llrORNIA Riverside County P1 arming Department County A~lministrative Center Riverside, California Attention: . Regional Team No. ~' P1 anner Area: R 4rHz: z ha./ We have reviewed this case and.have the following conwnents: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order' to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 1B inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports." drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. The District's report dated is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. .~,/" This project is a part of free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements accordance with approved plans. The project will be ~ave been constructed in The attached con~ents apply. V ry ,.OHN H. KASHUBA · Civil Engineer DATE: 14./,,,(0{ t ~ ct C) #25/R/eg/S Eastern Municipal ' V'at'er Di:;trict Juanixa L Hachek Riverside Co. Planning Dept. 4080 Lemon St., 9th Floor Riverside, Ca 92501 SUBJECT: r~/lY?-=-;- ~-- I~'1 ~ 2 ~ c:L Co c~ _ The District is responding to your request for connents on the subject project relative to water and/or sewer service. The items checked below apply to this project review. The subject project: /'Is not within EMWD's: /water service area sewer service area /Will be required to construct/provide the following facilities if to be served byEffi~D: Sewer Service Any and all necessary regionally sized onstte and offsite gravity sewers and appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers, treatment, and effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EFfaq) regulations will be allowed. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Planning Department COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Department of Building and 'rD: PLANt,,II.",,Ie" D TE= FROM: , ,~'__Please make the fOllOwing a condition of approval: ~_a. P~io~ to commencing any grading exceeding 5~ cubic ,~ B~ the o~ner o~ that p~Qpe~ty shall obtain a g~a~ing ' from the Department Of Building and Safety yards. permit Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a grading permit and approval of the rough grading shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. P~ior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Constructing a road, where greate~ than 50 cubic yards material is placed or moved, requires a grading permit. Prior to occupancy and/or beginning actual use of this permit, a grading permit and approval of the grading shal; be o~tained from the Building and Safety Department. Provide verification that the existing graBing was permitted and approval to construct was obtained from the Building and Safety. ___g. The G~ading Section has no comment on this site. NOTE: For the final grading plan - Please provide the applicable information from County Grading Forms ~8~-~1 ES~-12~ 2B~-13~ Rev. 3/89 ~ R.. C~dNTY OF RIVERSIDE Department of Building and Safety ease refer to the following comments when ~an for plan review by the Grading Section. X. 1. 5 X 12,. .,~..14, 15. .6. 19. submitting a grading Please refe~ to department forms 284-86,284-120,284-.21 and 24-46 for applicable information to include on your grading plans. In order to issue a ~rading permit, the following items will be needed-at the plan review stage. X a. Obtain a plan review permit. X b. Provide 2 copies of the Preliminary Soils Report. Xc. Provide a copy of the hydrologic-hydraulic study. d. Provide clearance departments. Submit 5 review. letters from the following Planning Flood Control Road Department Other F/~E Provide a set of the Planning Department conditions of approval on the approved case. Provide an erosion control plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, for plan review, permit, and bonding. copies of the grading plan for distribution and Refer to any specific plan related to this project. This property is located in the Rancho California Potential Subsidence area. Per Board Resolution 88-61, additional geotechnical information is required. Observe slope setbacks from permit areas and structures per section 7011 and figure 29-1 of the Uniform Building Code as modified by Ordinance 457. Driveway grades shall be 15% or less. = Show-street and pad elevations~ -Insure that a 1% grade (min~ can be'maintained from back of pad to street· Design V-ditches at top of slopes to handle the Q-100 year storm flow. Provide recorded drainage easements for the proposed lot to lot drainage. Show the Q-100 year storm flows at the inlet and outlet of all drainage fa'cilities. Provide building footprint on all lots. Design each lot to drain separately. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, projects having an imbalance between cut and fill shall specify the location of their impor~ or expor~ source. Show all slopes to scale, including terrace and setbacks. Proposed off-site grading will require written notarized permission from the affected property owner. /No obstruction or diversion of natural water courses shall be permitted. Provide sufficient offsite topography to show this projects compatibility with adjacent proper%los. verify any underlvin~ ~radinu was permitted and aDDroved ATTACHMENT NO. 4 MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 20, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING R:\STAFFRPTXlI31~Ag$.CC 114196 c, dr 11 L2mJCNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 20, 1990 mm~ssioner Ford moved to close the public hearing se nded by Commissioner Fahey and carried unanimous . ,- f Commis 'oner Hoagland moved to reject staff's recommen rion and not adopt the Nqgative D aration for Plot n Nos. 5 and 6 and deny Plot an Nos. 5 ia s to ensure ade~ screening of the roof equi , study t g and to re-evaluate the tion of truck loading doors. Commissi amended his motion by continuing the pub g on Item 4 and Item 5 to the Planning Comm n meeting of September 17, 1990. Commissionem zeconded the motion. AYES: COMMI FERS: Blair, FaheV, Ford, Hoagland, Chi ni aef f : 0 COMM None ~-Recess Chai P.M Dennis Chiniaeff declared a five minute o allow planning staff to set up more exhibits The meeting was reconvened at 7:55 P.M. =ess at 7:50 agenda Tentative Parcel Map 2-3969 6.] Deborah Parks presented staff's report on the subdivision of Parcel 22 of Parcel Map 18254 into four parcels. Ms. Parks stated that when the parcel map was approved by the County, they failed to show Pujol Street. County Ordinance 460 required the dedication of Pujol Street; at that time, however, is was overlooked and the width of Pujol Street remained at 40 feet. When Ohmdahl Enterprises applied to sub-divide, they were told by the County they would need the dedication of 20 feet of Parcel 2 for dedication of Pujol Street. Ohmdahl Enterprises had reached an agreement with Eastern Municipal Water District to provide an easement within this 20 feet. To widen Pujol Street would be a great · expense and at this time staff is unclear as to who would be responsible for the cost of these improvements. wxN .8/2o/9o -e- s/23/N PI.ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 20, 1990 3ohn Middleton stated that the Engineering DeDartment's recommendation was to construct Pujol Street as per county seandards. Anthony Polo, Markham & Associates..41750 Winchester Road, Temecula, qave a brief description of the project. William Haley, 28426 Pujol Street, Temecula, an adjacent property owner expressed his desire to have the developer proceed with the road improvements to Pujol Street as proposed by the County of Riverside. Anthony Polo offered an alternative to the Commission of leaving Pujol Street in its' present state and provide the dedication and improvements to create a cu]-de-sac on the end of Sixth Street. Doug Stewart, deputy traffic engineer, advised the Commission that the easement was neither Mr. Ohmdah]'s property nor Mr. Maley's property. He stated that County Ordinance Mo.460 and the recommendation by the Riverside County Transportation Department requires certain improvements be completed; however, there is an exception clause within the ordinance that would allow the Commission to deviate from these regu~red street improvements, but only under that exception clause could the Commission consider anything other than what was recommended by the county. Commissioner Fahey questioned the reference to special circumstances of the exception applicable to the properties size, shape or topagraphy, and did that exception apply to such conditions created by the property owner. Doug Stewart stated that the ordinance reauires that the applicant put in a street: however. it would be at a substantial cost to the applicant, and since applicant has offered other alternatives that seem more appropriate, the commission could consider one of these alternatives and make that reco.a.endation to the Cit~ Council. Commissioner Chiniaeff asked if staff needed action by the Commission to come back with a partial recox~,.endation. az~ .8120190 -1- 8/23190 PLANNING CONMISSION ~IJUTES &UGUST 20, 1990 john Cavanaugh advised the Co...ission that if they were to approve this parcel map and recolmi~',end there be a partial aedication or recommend that part of the dedication be accomplished by another property owner other than the applicant, the Commission needs to be aware that if the other property owner does not approve of the recon~endation, and if that 'approval is not sought within 120 days after the Commission's recommendation. this condition will automatically terminate. Commissioner Ford asked if this was a condition for outside improvements, could the Commission request the applicant to bond or guarantee the acquisition rights of the property. John Cavanaugh stated that the Co,,i','dssion cou]d either recommend that the applicant provide the dedication of his own property or recommend partial dedication/vacation of the other property owner. If the other property owner does not approve 120 days after the Con~nission acts on it, this condition is automatically terminated. Commissioner Fahey moved to not adopt the Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 23969, and to continue the item to September 17, 1990, with staff working with both parties to come to an agreement acceptable. Commissioner Ford seconded the motion. AYES: 5" CONNISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 7.' FIst PI-~ 11621 KIll. 8/20190 -8- 8/23/90 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 MINUTES FROM THE SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MEETING R:\STAFFRPT~I13PA95.CC 1/4l~ cdr I 2 PrnDn~a.I to' suD~lvide Parcel 22 of Parcel MaD ]8954, Located at RidQe Park Drive, South of Rancho California Rnad,,~nto four parcels. The Commission continued this item from the meetinQ of AuQust 20, 1990, and directed staff to work with t'he applicant and the adjacent property owner on a solution to the access problem. DEBORAH PARKS prov~deO the staff report on this item. She stated that staff arranged a meeting however, Mr. Haley d~d not attend that meetjnQ but was advised of the resutts. JOHN MIDDI.ETON stated that in speaking with the Riverside County Fire Department regarding the proposed improvements of Pujo] Street. They confirmed that the aop[icant could build Pujo[ Street according to 32'/50' stacCatOs and that a turn-around at the end of the col-de- sac would not be necessary at this time since the street onJv provides access to one dwelling uni~. He stated that the Engineering Department recon~nendation would be to construct an offset col-de-sac when Mr. Haley develops his property. ANTHONY POLO, Markham & Associates, 41750 Winchester Road, Temecula, asked for clarification of Condition No. 29, requesting pu~tic facility financing. GARY THORNHILL stated that Condition No. 29 did not pertain to this item and should be deleted. WILLIAM HALEY, 28426 Pujol Street. Temecula, adjacent Dropert~ owner. expressed h:s OppOSition to the reco~=nendation by the Engineering Department. MIN. 9/17/90 -6- 9/21/90 Rnao Oena~tment dl.~ not condition him to build the cu~ ~-sac, add t~at the cu]-de-sac would be o~ no benefit to ~ls Drooertv: h~wever, he has o~ered to put ~n the curb ~nd .~utter and 3P' o~ street improvements to expedite the approvaL. COMMISSIONER FORD clarified that Mr. Omdahl was Drovidina approximately 80% of the street improvements and these .improvements woula be of no benefit to his property. He su~aested that Mr. Ha[ey might want to vacate the property ~n the future. COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND and carried unanimously, AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair0 Fahey, For~, Hoagland, Chinjaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to adopt the Negative Declaration for Parcel MaD No. 23969 and approve Parcel MaD No. 23969, based on the analysis and findings in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval- modified by the deletion of Condition No. 29, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND and carried by the followin~ vote. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Ford, Hoaqland, Chiniaeff NOES: i COMMISSIONERS: Blair ARc .n 2 5 6 3 3 PLOT PLAN NO. 11669:--.=-. ............. 5.1 Proposal to subdi~ide-'=~:2'='~eS"intD, four parcels and ~ve~ r a ~ark the we~t"-side o~ Business Park Drive, north MIN. 9/17/90 -7- 9/21/90 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 MINUTES FROM THE SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MEETING R:\STAFIqtFf%II3PAg~.CC 114196 exit 13 City Cou~L~ Minutes September 25, 1990 11. 10-A Permit - S hen's Kangaroo Rat . 11.1 Authorize e Mayor to execute Federal Fi 'and Wildlife License/Perm pplication for incidental 11.2 Authorize the May to execut - i~st Amendment to Agency Agreement California E n ed Species Permit. The motion was carried by the. f : AYES: 5 COU Lindemans, . Moore, · ks 8. Parcel Map No. 23969 Councilmember Moore referred to Planning Condition No. 23, asking that the "Standard 810 barricade" be changed to something more aesthetic. Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, stated this is a temporary barricade and will be removed when adjoining properties are developed. Councilmember Mu~oz asked for a brief report from staff outlining the major issues in this case. Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, explained the significant issue discussed before the Planning Commission was the design of the road where the barricade is proposed. He stated the sewer agency installed lines in the road right-of-way, which caused a re-design of the road. Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, presented slides showing the right-of-way and the 10 foot strip the applicant has agreed to construct. Minutes\9\2S\90 -3- 11/28/95 City Council Minutes September 25.1990 Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to receive and file Parcel Map No. 23969. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Moore, ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Conditional Use Permit No. 2980. Revised Permit No. I Jncilmember Mu~oz asked if this two-lane street can ic proposed by this project? potential Dou 9wart stated that it is his understanding that which a ressed these issues, study was done Gary ;aid this project is a very low of traffic. It is a storage facility, and receive mostly night ar d access, and therefore is not a concern to lff. Mayor Parks asked if e are an' for a traffic signal at this intersection. He stated he shares ,r Mu~oz' concern regarding the traffic in this area and asked the Enginee~ Department to look into a possible exit off of Lyndie Lane from the Car tnd shopping center. . The motion .w s carried by the following vot AYES' 5 COUNCILMEMBERS' Birds I Lindemans Moore N S: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Minutes\9\25\90 -4- 11/28/95 ITEM 28 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATI'ORNEvA~~~ DIRECTOR OF FI A CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director February 13, 1996 Planning Application No. PA95-0133, Zoning Amendment and Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0134,CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTH OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007 Read by title only and introduce ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95- 0133, ZONING AMENDMENT~ CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTHERLY OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'$ PARCEL NO. 921-680-007 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA95-0133,Zoning Amendment and Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment R:\STAP'FRF~I33PA96.CC 2/5196 kJb 1 BACKGROUND The purpose of the requests are to allow for the expansion of the adjacent Nissan dealership onto the subject site. The proposal to expand the Nissan dealership to this site is inconsistent Wlith the existing Community Commercial General Plan Land Use and Draft Zoning El signations. Specifically, automobile dealership are prohibited in the Community C~ommercial Designation. Thus, should the Council not adopt the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment, the proposal to expand will not be permitted. The proposed site is located on one of two vacant parcels within a commercial shopping center. The center contains retail shops and a restaurant to the east and a vacant parcel of land to the south of the subject site. Car dealerships are located to the north and west of the site. On January 8, 1996, the Planning Commission found that the proposals would be compatible with the surrounding automobile dealership and retail uses. Thus, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve the above referenced amendments. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: City Council Resolution No. 96- - Page 3 City Council Ordinance No. 96- - Page 7 January 8, 1996 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11 R:\STAFFRF~I33PA96.CC 215196 kJb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- R:XSTAFFRPT~I33PA96.CC 2/5/96 klb ~ ATTACItlVIENT NO. 1 RF_~OLUTION NO. 96-- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TIFF. CITY OF TEMECULA RECO~ING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0134, CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION PROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTH OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007 WI:fEREAS, Tetraton Corporation fried Planning Application No. PA95-0134 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WtIEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0134 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; W!~REAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA95-0134 on January 8, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WttEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA95-0134; WtIEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA95-0134 on February 13, 1996, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA95-0134; WtIEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA95-0134; NOW, T!~EREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THY~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETFMMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. FindinEs. A. The City Council in approving the proposed General Plan Amendment, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan. R:\STAFFRPT'd33PA96.CC 2/5/96 klb 4 2. The pwposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing and future commercial developments. 3. Mitigation measures in contained within the Mitigation Monitoring Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal below a level of significance. 4. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted in the Draft Development Code due to the fact that the development standards as proposed within the Draft Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative Declaration ensure orderly development of the site. 5. Said findings axe supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA95-0134, as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and weftare of the community. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study determined that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposal. Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecuh City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. PA95-0134 to change the General Phn Land Use Designation on approximately .67 acres of land fwm Community Commercial to Service Commercial on pwperty located on the easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-680-007. R:\ST~133PA96.CC 2'6/96 Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of February, 1996. KAI~RT- F. LI2q'D~S MAYOR I FrEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of February, 1996 by the following vote of the Council: COU'N~ERS: NOES: CO~CILMEMBERS: COUNCK2VIEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~STAFFRPT~I33PA96.CC 2/5/96 klb 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 96- R:~'TA~I33PAg~.CC 2/$196 klb 7 ATTACffi~NT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TIi~ECULA APPROVING PIANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0L33, ZONING A1V~-~~, CHANGING ~ ZONING DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY CO1VIM~-RC~ TO SERVICE CO1VIMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON Tit'F, EASTERLY SIDE OF YNET. ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORT!tERLY OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007 WItF~, Terraton Corporation ~ed Planning Application No. PA95-0133 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WltEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0133 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WttEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA95-0133 on January 8, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WB'EREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, ff any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA95-0133; WItEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Application No. PA95-0133 on February 13, 1996, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA95-0133; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA95-0133; NOW, T!~-REFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findines. A. The City Council in approving the proposed Change of zone, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan. R:~STAFFRPT~I33PA96.CC 216196 lab 8 2. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing and future commercial developments. 3. Mitigation measures in contained within the Mitigation Monitoring Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal below a level of significance. 4. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted in the Draft Development Code due to the fact that the development standards as proposed within the Draf~ Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative Declaration ensure orderly development of the site. 5. Said findings axe supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA95-0133, as proposed, is compatible with the health~ safety and welfare of the community. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study determined that although the proposal could have a .significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposal. Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. PA95-0133 to change the zoning on approximately .67 acres of land from Community Commercial to Service Commercial on property located on the easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-680-007. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:~STAFFRPT~133PA96.CC 2/6196/Lib 9 Section 5. PASSI~.n, AlPROVED AND ADOPIT_J)this 13th day of February, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAII!:~ORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 - was duly introduced and phced upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of February, 1996, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCII/VIEMBERS COUNC]I1VIEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\STAFFRPT~133PA96.CC 2/5196 k~ '[ 0 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 JANUARY 8, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R:\STA, FI~-.F~i33]~A96.CC 2/5196 IrJb 11 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING January 8, 1996 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Application No. PA95-0133, Zoning Amendment. Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: RECOMMEND Adoption of the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA95-0133,Zoning Amendment and Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment; and ADOPT Resolution No. 96- recommending approval of PA95-0133, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and ADOPT Resolution No. 96- recommending approval of PA95-0134, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and APPLICATION INFORMATION RECOMMEND Approval of Planning Application No. PA95- 0133, Zoning Amendment and Planning Applica.tion No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT: Terraton Corporation/Nissan of Temecula REPRESENTATIVE: Larry Markham, Markham & Associates PROPOSAL: General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment for a .67 acre parcel to change the existing land use and zoning designation from Community Commercial to Service Commercial LOCATION: The easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of Solana Way EXISTING ZONING: C 1/CP (General Commercial) PROPOSED ZONING: SC (Service Commercial) R:\STAFFRPT~.I33PA95.PC 1/4/96 klb 1 SURROUNDING ZONING: North: C1/CP South: C1/CP East: C1/CP West: CPS (General Commercial) (General Commercial) (General Commercial) (Highway Tourist Commercial) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Service Commercial EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Car Dealership Vacant Commercial Shopping Center Car Dealership BACKGROUND Planning Application No. PA95-0133 and Planning Application No. PA95-0134 were formally submitted to the Planning Department on December 14, 1995. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on January 4, 1996. Planning Application No. PA95- 0133 and Planning Application No. PA95-0134 were deemed complete on January 4. 1996. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is for a General Plan Amendment to change the existing Land Use Designation from Community Commercial to Service Commercial and a Zoning Amendment to change the proposed Zoning Designation from Community Commercial to Service Commercial. ANALYSIS The proposed site is located on one of two vacant parcels within a commercial shopping center. The center contains retail shops and a restaurant to the east and a vacant parcel of land to the south of the subject site. Car dealerships are located to the north and west of the site. The Planning Department has received applications on both vacant parcels. The southerly parcel has a proposal for a gas station/mini-market/car wash and on the subject site is a proposal to expand the adjacent Nissan dealership to this site (the expansion request is a separate application and is not before the Commission). The proposal to expand the Nissan dealership to this site is inconsistent with the General Plan and Draft Development Code. The Community Commercial Draft Zoning and Land Designations prohibit automobile dealership uses. The Draft Zoning and Land Designations do permit gas stations. Thus, should the Planning Commission or the City Council ultimately not adopt the General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zoning Amendment (ZA), the proposal to expand the dealership cannot be approved. It is the opinion of staff that the GPA and ZA, and ultimately the automobile dealership, would be compatible with the surrounding dealership and retail uses. R:\STAFFRFT~I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 Idb 2 EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The existing General Plan Land Use Designation and the proposed Zoning Designation are Community Commercial. The proposal will change the designations to Service Commercial .~o facilitate the proposed automobile dealership expansion. The Draft Zoning Code ~onditionally permits automobile dealerships in the Service Commercial Zone. Therefore, a ~onditional Use Permit will be required to be approved before the dealership can expand. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION' Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study determined that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposal. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The site of the proposal is located in an area with numerous auto-related and retail business. Vacant land in the area is anticipated to include more of the same. Thus, it is staff's opinion that the approval of the GPA and ZA to facilitate. the automobile dealership expansion will be consistent with the existing and anticipated land uses in the area. Thus, staff recommends that the Commission recommend approval to the City Council. FINDINGS 1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing and future commercial developments. Mitigation measures contained within the Mitigation Monitoring Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal below a level of significance. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted in the Draft Development Code due to the fact that the development standards as proposed within the Draft Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative Declaration ensure orderly development of the site. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. R:\STAFFRixI~133PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 3 Attachments: 2. 3. 4. PC Resolution - Blue Page 5 PC Resolution - Blue Page 9 Initial Study - Blue Page 13 Exhibits - Blue Page 38 A, Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C, General Plan Map R:~TAFFRPT~I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 kib 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- R:\STAFFRPT~I33PA95.PC I/3/96 ATTACHMENT NO. '1 I~ESOLUTION NO. 9~-- A RESOLUTION OF TFW. PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMI~.NDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO, PA9~-0133, CHANGING ~ ZONING DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMM'F, RC~ TO SERVICE COMMF~RCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON TH'E EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTHERLY OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007 WltF. RFAS, Terraton Corporation fried Planning Application No. PA95-0133 in accordance with the City of Temecuh General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WltEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0133 was processed in the lime and manner prescribed by State and local law; WItF. RF. AS , the Planning Commission considereA Planning Application No. PA95-0133 on January 8, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; ~, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, ff any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA95-0133; NOW, THEREFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA95-0133, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan. 2. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing and future commercial developments. R:\STAFFRFr~I33PA95.PC 113/96 klb 6 3. Mitigation measures in containext within the Mitigation Monitoring Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal below a level of significance. 4. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted in the Draft Development Code due to the fact that the development standards as proposed within the Draft Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative Declaration ensure orde~y development of the site. 5. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA95-0133, as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study determined that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposal. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA95-0133 to change the zoning on approximately .67 acres of land from Community Commercial to Service Commercial on property located on the easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-680-007. R:\STAFFRPT',I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 7 Section 5. PASSFJ~, APPROV';.I~ AND ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 1996. STEVEN I. FORD CH.MRMAN I WEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of January, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: DEBBIE UBNOSKE SECRETLY R:\STAFFRFBla3PA95.1K; 1~/96 lab 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 96- R:\STAF'FRFI",133PA95.PC 1/3/96 Idb 9 ATrACI-IM~NT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 9~- A RESOLUTION OF TIFF. PLANNING COMMIqSION OF TIFF. CITY OF TENIECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0134, CHANGING THF. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE CO1VIMF. RCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET NORTH OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680--007 WltEREAS, Terraton Corporation fried Planning Application No. PA95-0134 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0134 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA95-0134 on January 8, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an oppormhity to testify either in support or in opposition; WttF.~, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relath~g to Planning Application No. PA95-0134; NOW, TI:IF. REFORE, TtIR PLANNING COS/ISIISSION OF TIFF. CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETF_,R54]NE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. A. The Planning Contmission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA95-0134, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan. 2. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing and future commercial developments. 3. Mitigation measures in contained' within the Mitigation Monitoring Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal a level of significance. R:\STAF~I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb '[ 0 4. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses described in the General Plan due to the fact that the requirements of the General Plan, the development standards proposed within the Draft Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative Declaration ensure orderly development of the site. 5. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA95-0134, as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study determined that although the proposed proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposal. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA95-0134 to change the General Plan Land Use Designation on an approximately .67 acres of land from Community Commercial to Service Commercial on property located on the easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet north of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way and known as Assessor' s Parcel No. 921-680- 007. R:\STAFFRPTM33PA95.PC 1/3196 kJb ~ ~ Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 8th day of January, 1996. STEVEN J. FORD CHAInMAN I B'F. REBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of January, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: DEBBIE UBNOSKE SECRETARY a:xs~Amnum~ssP^95.pc m/96 klb 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 INITIAL STUDY R:\STAFFRPT'x133PA95.pC 1/3/96 klb 1 ~3 CITY OF TEMECULA Environmental Checklist m Project Title: Planning Application No. 95-0133, Change of Zone Planning Application No. 95-0134, General Plan Amendment Planning Application No. 95-0136, Revised Permit Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Temecula 43714 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Contact Person and Phone Number: Craig Ruiz (909) 694-6400 Project Location: Easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of Solana Way Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Terraton Corp. P.O. Box 2159 Escondido, CA 92033 General Plan Designation: CC (Community Commercial) Zoning: C1/CP (General Commercial) Description of Project: Zoning Amendment to change the zoning from Community Commercial (CC) to Service Commercial (SC), General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use Designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Service Commercial (SC), and a Revised Permit to allow the expansion of an existing car dealership to an adjacent and vacant parcel of land. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is an approximately .6 acre vacant parcel in a neighborhood commercial shopping center. The shopping center is located immediately to the east of the site, car dealerships are located to the west and north, and to the south is vacant land. The property to the south is currently undergoing development review for a proposed gas station, mini-market and self-service car wash. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside County Health Department, Eastern Municipal Water District, Rancho California Water District, Southern California Gas Company, Southern California Edison Company, General Telephone Company. R:\STAFFRPT~133PA95.PC 1/3196 Idb 14 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ (~ Land Use and Planning [ ] [ ] Population and Housing .. [ ] [ ] Geologic Problems [ ] [ ] Water [ ] [ ] Air Quality [ ] [ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] [ ] Biological Resources [ ] [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Hazards Noise Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: [] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. IX] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. R:\STAFFRP'~I33PA95.PC 113196 klb 15 [] I find that although the 'proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in a earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. SignatUre ?~ Date Craig D. Ruiz EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Issues and Supporting:Information Sources ,:: : ~;:: 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Potentially · : Significant Potentially Un|es~ Significant Mitigation : Impact :: Incorporated Would the proposal: a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (1, F2ol, p. 2-17) X Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (2) c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (1, F2-1, p. 2-17) da Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (1, F5-4, p. 5-17) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including low-income or minority community)? ( ) 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:. an Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (1, T4-2a, p. 4-5) bu Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (1, T4-2a, p. 4-5) c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (1, F2-1, p. 2-17) GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving? a. Fault rupture? (1, F7-1, p 7-6) Seismic ground shaking? (1, F7-1, p 7-6) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (1, F7-2, p 7-9) d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( ) Leaa Than SignifiGant Impact X X Impact X X X X X X X X X R:\STAFFRPTM33PAgS.PC 113196 Idb 17 Issuesand ::Supporting: Information Sources ImpBct e. Landslides or mudflows? (2, pgs. 65-70) f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? (2, pgs 65-70) g. Subsidence of the land? (1, F7-2, p 7-9) h. Expansive soils? (2, pgs 60-65) i. Unique geologic or physical features? (2, pgs 60-65) WATER. Would the proposal result in: 8. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and mount of surface runoff? ( ) b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (1, F7- 3, p. 7-10 and 1, F7-4, p. 7-12) c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( ) e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) f. Chj~nge in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) h. Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) : Potentially Significant Unless :-Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X X X X X X X X X X X X X R:\STAFFRPT%I33PA95.PC I/3/96 klb' 18 Issues and Supporting:Information Sources i. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: ae Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (2, pgs. 70-92) b. 'Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) d. Create objectionable odors? ( ) TRAN SPO RTATI O N/CI RCU LATI ON. Would the proposal result in: Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion ? (2, pgs 201-239) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? ( ) c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off- site? ( ) e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ~ Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (2, pgs. 201- 239) -g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( ) Potentielly 'Significant Impact Potentially Signifk:ant Unless Mitigation Incorporated · Less Than Significant Impact X X Impec~ X X X X X X X X X X R:\STAFFRlr~133PA95.PC 113196 idb 19 Potentially Issues: .and!:Supporting Information Sources : sig.ffioant :.~:: .!' !!:i !. · : Impact 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: ae Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)? b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) Cs Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? F5-3, pg 5-15) d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (1, F5o3, pg 5-15) e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) Cs Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: as A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation)? ( ) be Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X X X X X X X X X X R:~.STAFFRPT~I33?A95.PC 1/3/96 kJb 20 10. 11. Issues and Supp:orting: Information Sources . c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ( ) d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? ( ) b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the Potentially Signfficant Impact Potentially SigniFyant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact following areas: a. Fire protection? ( ) X b. Police protection? ( ) X c. Schools7 ( ) X d. Maintenance of public facilities, including X roads? ( ) e. Other governmental services? ( ) Impact X X X X R:\STAFFP,.PT%133PA95,PC 1/3/96 klb 21 12. Issues and Supporting. Information Sources Impact : ' Potentially: Signire}ant ' · Potentially : . Unless. IVlitigation Incorporated UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. b. C. Power or natural gas? ( ) Communications systems? ( ) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? ( ) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) Storm water drainage? ( ) Solid waste disposal? ( ) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) c. Create light or glare? ( ) 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? (2, F55, p.280) b. Disturb archaeological resources? (2, F56, p. 283) c. Affect historical resources? (2, p. 281) d. Have the potential to oause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: X Lass Than Significant Impact Impact X X X X X X X X X X X X X X R:\STAFFR.PT~133PA95.PC 113196 klb 22 Issues andSupportingJnformation Sources : Sign,it.., M~jga~n : : .: ::.:.: :: Impact incorporated aa Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) Leas Than Significant. Impact. X X R:\STAFFP, l~I33PA95.PC 1/3196 ldb 23 16. 17. · !. ;; Potentially :.-:: .........: - :.~: Signifk}ant Issues:: and: Supporti ng:::~ Information Sources ~ ~ ~ ~ s~nmc,,,t ~. e~at~on : ':; :: :' i: :~ i: .: :.: : Impact ' Incorporated MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Less Than Significant. Impact No Impact a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c. Does the project have impacts that area individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that eh incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? EARLIER ANALYSES. X X X X Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one ~r more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. R:\STAFFRPT%I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 Idb 24 Potentially ': ': :: :~ · Significant : Potentially Unless Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~n~i~-ant ~4~i.et~. S~nif~t No Impact I~o~rated' !mp~t Impa~ b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identi~ which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier documen~ pursuant to applicable legal standards, and sZa~e whether such effects were addressed by miZigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant wi~h Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were' incorporated or refined from the earlier documen~ and the extent to which ~hey address site-specific conditions for the project. J - Ci~ of Tem~ula Gene~ ~ : - Cit7 o[ TemecuJa Gene~ ~]~ F~ Env~omen~ Zmpact ~o~ R:\STAFFRPT~I33PA95.pC 1/3/96 klb 2~ DISCUSSION OF ~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Land Use and Planning 1.a. The project is a request for a change of zone and general plan amendment. project be approved, the zoning map and general plan for the City accordingly. Thus, should the will be amended I.e. The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including low-income or minority community). The project is in an existing commercial center. There is no established residential community (including low-income or minority community) at this site. Geologic Problems 3.a.b. Any development of the site will expose people and property to earthquake hazards since the project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. Any potential impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. Information contained in the City of Temecula General Plan Environmental Impact Report (certified November 9, 1993) states that the project wffi not expose people or property to geologic hazards such as landslides or mudslides. No known landslides are located on the site or proximate to the site. The same is tree for mudslides. There is no potential for ground failure and liquefaction in this area. 3.d. The project will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard. The projedt is not located in an area where any of these hazards could occur. 3.f. The project will have a less than significant impact from erosion, changes in topography, grading or fill. Increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site. may occur during the construction phase of the project and the project may result in changes in siltation, deposition or erosion. Erosion control techniques will be included as a condition of approval for the project. In the long-ran, hardscape and landscaping will serve as permanent erosion control for the project. The project will result in a change in the site topography and ground surface relief features for the creation of additional parking spaces on site. Grading will be necessary for the realiTation of this project. Since the amount of grading will be the minimum necessary for the realization of the project, modification to topography and ground surface relief features wffi not be considered significant. Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fil,l will be mitigated through the use of landscaping and proper compaction of the soils. Water 4.a. The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage paRems and the rate and amount of surface runoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, any potential impacts can be mitigated through site design. R:\STAFFRFBI33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 26 Drainage conveyances will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle the runoff which will be created. 4.c. The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until. an NPDES Notice of Intent has been fried or the project is shownto be exempt. By complying with the N'PDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 4.d. The project will not result in a change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody. No major waterbodies are located in the subject project area. 4.e. The project will not impact currents, or to the course or direction of water movements. The project site is not located adjacent to either marine or fresh water sources or areas where there is concentrated currents or water movements. 4.f-h. The project will not result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. No changes will occur in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquffer by cuts or excavations. Further, the project will not result in an altered direction or rate of flow of groundwaters or in impacts to groundwater quality. Construction On the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground. waters. 4.i. The project will not result in a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater water otherwise available for public water supplies. Water service currently exists at the project site. Additional water service will need to be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD). This is typically provided upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Air Ouality 5.b. The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no sensitive receptors in proximity to the project~ 5.c. The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate. The limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts on the environment in this area. 5.d. The project will create objectional odors during the construction phase of the project. These impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant. R:\STAFFRPTXI33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 27 Transportation/Circulation 6.8. The project will result in a less than significant increase in vehicle trips and may add to traffic congestion. It is anticipated that the project have a less than five (5) percent increase to the nearest intersection (Solana Way and Ynez Roads during peak travel hour. The applicant will be required to pay traffic signal mitigation fees and public facility fees as conditions of approval for the project. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 6.b.c. The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is in-fill within an existing center. Further, the project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards to safety from design features. 6.d. The project will have sufficient parking capacity on-site. The applicant has completed a parking needs analysis based upon the uses proposed by this project. Based upon this analysis, there will be sufficient on-site parking spaces provided. 6.e. The project will not result in hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists. A sidewalk exist on the site along Ynez Road. Hazards or barriers to bicyclists have not been included as part of the project. 6.g. The project will not result in impacts to rail, waterborne or air traffic since none exists currently in the immediate proximity of the project. Biological Resources 7.8. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats, including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project site has been previously graded and is located adjacent to a commercial shopping center. Currently, there are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or .endangered species of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species exist at this location. The project will not reduce the number of species, provide a barrier to the migration of animals or deteriorate existing habitat. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be required to mitigate the effect of cumulative impacts to the species. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.b. The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated species are protected in the, Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are not protected elsewhere in the City. Since this project is not located in Old Town, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.e. The project will not result in an impact to wildlife dispenal or migration corridors. The project site does not serve as part of a migration corridor. R:k~TAFFRP'BI33PAg,~.PC 1/3/96 Itlb 2~ Energy 8.a. 8.b. 8.c. Hazards and Mineral Resources The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s) (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant. The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are located at this project site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 9.a. 9.b. 9.c. 9.d. 9.e. Noise The project will not result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in the request. The same is tree for the use, storage, transport or disposal .of any hazardous or toxic materials. The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an-emergency evaluation plan. The subject site is not located in an area which could impact an emergency response plan. The project will take access from a maintained street and will therefore not impede any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No health hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with ~ammable brush, grass, or trees. The project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. 10.a. The proposal will result in increases to existing noise levels. The site is curren~y vacant and any development of the land would result in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long run. The project site is located within a commercial corridor. There are no sensitive receptors located in the area. R:\STAFFRP'BI33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 29 lO.b. The project may expose people to severe noise levels and vibrations during the development/construction phase (short run). Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in. the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This. source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. Public Services ll.a,b. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire or police protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service provision from these entities. ll.c. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for .new or altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate to the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities. .ll.d. The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public facilities, including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California. Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site will be incremental, however, they will not be considered significant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses. ll.e. The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Utilities and Service Systems 12.a. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to power or natural gas. These systems are curren~y being delivered to the site. 12.b. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to communication systems (reference response No. 12.a.). 12.c. The project will have a less than significant effect in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. 12.d. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both ElVlWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (,p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. There are no .septic tanks on site or proximate to the site. R:\STAFFR.PT~I33PA95.PC !/3/96 klb 30 12.e. The proposal will result in a need for new systems .or supplies, or substantial alterations to storm water drainage. The project is in-fill, and will need to provide some additional on-site drainage systems. The drainage system will be required as a condition of approval for the project and will tie into the existing system. 12.f. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Programs which are implemented by the City. 12.g. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or regional water supplies. Reference response 12. d. Aesthetics 13 .a. The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is in-fill and is not located in a area where there is a scenic vista. Further, the City does not have any designated scenic highways. 13 . b. The project is an inffil in nature and will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. 13.c. The project will have a potentially significant impact from light and glare. The project will produce and result in light/glare as all development of this nature results in new light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. The project will be conditioned to be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). Cultural Resources 14.d. The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. None exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14.e. The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. No religious or sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Recreation 15 .a,b. The proposal will not result in impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate to the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. R:\STAFFRPT',I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 3'] A'I'I'ACHIVIENT NO. 3 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:\STAFFRPT~133PA95.pC 1/3/9~ 32 ,< < A3'I'ACHMENT NO. 4 EXHIBITS R:~qTAFFRPT~133PAgS.PC 1/3/96 klb 38 CITY OF TEMECULA (I // TEMECULA - /RANCHO ."' ..... ~ CALIFO~-~IA · 'zso;o z~loo ~1 CASE NO. - PA95-133, PA95-0134 EXHIBIT- A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 8, 1996 VICINITY MAP II R: \STAFFR. P'~I33PAg$.PC 1/3196 Irlb CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - C1/CP (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN 3ESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL CASE NO. - PA95-0133, PA95-0134 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 8, 1996 R:\STAFFR. F~I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb ITEM 29 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manage/~r' Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director February 13, 1996 Interim Planning Application Fees Prepared By: John Meyer, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the City Council: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION FEES BACKGROUND On December 19, 1995, the City Council adopted the Development Code. As a result, new Planning Applications go into effect on February 9, 1996. The Development Code includes new and renamed applications that are not reflected on the City's current fee schedule. ANALYSIS The City is nearing completion of a comprehensive User Fee Study that reflects the applicatioris found in the New Development Code. At the present time, all City departments have prepared draft fees. However, due to a time and motion study being done by the Building and Safety Department, staff is not prepared to present these fees to the City Council. This time and motion study was begun in November of 1995 and will take approximately six months to complete. At the conclusion of this time, staff will meet with the development community in a series of workshops to discuss the fees. Following these workshops, staff will bring the User Fee Study to the City Council. In the interim, staff recommends the adoption of an interim fee schedule. The proposed schedule is attached for your review. The fees were established by using the current application that most closely resembles the new application. These proposed fees will be valid for a period of thirty days, unless extended following a public hearing. Staff will notice a public hearing for the Council on the March 12, 1996 meeting. These will be in effect until the new user fees are adopted. This action requires a 4/5 vote. R:~AFFI~'F~.CC 2n/~6 Im~ 1 FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 96- 2. .. - Page 2 Interim Planning Application Fee Schedule - Page 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION FEES WHEREA~, The City Council adopted the General Plan on November 9, 1993. WtlERE~kS, The General Plan for the City of Temecula calls for the adoption of a Development Code. WHEREAS, On December 19,1995, the City Council adopted the Development Code. WtlEI~EAS, The Development Code results in new Planning Applications. NOW, THF_~EFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Council makes the following findings: 1. The City's new Development Code became effective on February 9, 1996; and 2. The new Development Code generally replaces existing planning application processes, procedures, and fees; and 3. Without established application fees to implement the new Development Code, either applications ~ed until such new fees are adopted would be held or City general fund revenues would be required to cover the costs of funding private. development pwjects resulting in less funding available for public safety among other uses; and 4. Without interim authority to change fees for planning applications under the new Development Code, any application funding would be done with City general fund sources decreasing funding available for other public services including, public safety, recreation, and street maintenance. Such a result would jeopardize the welfare of the public and be inconsistent with City goals of keeping Temecuh a desirable place to live, work, and raise families. Section 2. The City Council hereby adopts, as authorized by the new Development Code the fees as set forth in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and.incorporated herein by this reference, as the interim fees for processing planning applications under the new Development Code. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66017C0) this resolution and the fees adopted herein are interim fees necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare as set forth above and shall take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths vote of the City Council. Section 4. The fees adopted herein shall be valid for a period of thirty (30) days unless extended by the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 66017(b) following notice and a public hearing in accordance with Government Code Section 66016. t Section $. Environmental Compliance. The Interim Planning Application Fees are not a~lproject under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED this 13th day of February, 1996. Karel Lindemans, Mayor A~FEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TElVIEC~ I ItEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of February, 1996 by the following vote of the City Council: COUNCILMF-MBERS NOES: COUNCILMF-MBERS COUNCILlVfEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk ATTACHMENT NO. 2 INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE R:~STAFFRI'I'~rfV.,~ES.CC 2/7/96 im 6 General Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment .. Text Changes Map Changes Specific Plan Conditional Use Permit - Existing Building Conditional Use Permit- New Building Development Plan (10,000 square feet or greater) Development Plan (less than 10,000 square feet) Development Plan (less than 10,000 square feet - exempt from CEQA) Variance Temporary Use Permits Minor Exceptions Home Occupation Permit ATTACHMENT NO. 2 INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE · ·:·APPLICATION ....... FEE' $5,563 3,617 3,617 15,578 888 5,790. 5,445 3,105 2,095 1,954 190 190 20 ITEM 30 APPROVAL C I TY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance February 13, 1996 Review and Approval of the 22nd Year Community Development Block Grant Applications for FY 1996-97 PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst~4~' RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendations submitted by the Finance Committee, and provide final recommendations to be forwarded to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA) for consideration. DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through local governments. The objectives of this program are to develop adequate housing, a suitable living environment, and to increase economic development in the community· In order for a project to be considered for funding, it must meet one of the following national goals: Low/moderate income persons primarily benefit from the activity; or, The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or, The activity meets an emergent community development need. A total of eleven (11 ) qualified applications were submitted to the City for consideration. The applications are summarized in priority order in Attachment A. Preliminary estimates from the EDA allocate approximately $242,000 for non-public service projects, and approximately $43,000 for public service projects. The City received one non- public service application requesting a grant in the amount of $240,000, and ten (10) public service project applications totalling $75,669. A prioritized breakdown of all projects, requested funding, and Finance Committee recommendations is summarized in Attachment B. The Committee recommendations were based on the assumption that the entire amount of $43,000 will be available. Since there is still an uncertainty as to the actual amount to be funded, and the amount of funding available for public service projects may be less than the estimated amount, the recommendations have been listed in priority order to provide the EDA with the City's preferred projects to which appropriated funds should be allocated. FISCAL IMPACT: All CDBG funds allocated to City projects will replace other funding sources (i.e., General Fund, Community Services District), which can then be used for other appropriate projects. The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have no impact on the City, since the City merely serves as a conduit for administering funds provided by the County. Attachments: A. Community Development Block Grant Application Summary B. Prioritized CDBG Funding Recommendations CDBG FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS IN-~L~DER OF PRIORITY AL,,,,JISITION/FACILITIES PROJECTS Sam Hicks Monument Park Temecula Community Center Acquisition TOTAL ACQUISITION PROJECTS AGENCY TCSD TCSD FINANCE PRIOR COMMrI'I'EE YEAR FUNDING FUNDING AWARD REQUESTED RECOMMENDED $248,403 $0 N/A N/A $240,000 $248,403 $240,000 $242,000 $242,000 PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS Temecula Recreation and Human Services TCSD N/A $12,500 $12,500 Emergency Food & Aid Alternatives to Domestic Violence Boys & Girls Club P~-Temecula Operation School Bell Temecula Valley Special Olympics SafeHouse - Emergency Shelter for Runaway/Homeless Youth Rape Awarness and Prevention Parent Center Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program Family Friends TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS Temecula Senior Center $10,000 $10,000 Alternatives to $2,500 $2,500 Domestic Violence Boys &Girls Club $10,000 $28,080 Of Temecula Assistance League of $5,000 $10,000 Temecula Valley Temecula Valley Special N/A $1,600 Olympics Operation Safe House N/A $2,000 Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Parent Center Riverside Dept of Community Action VIP Tots N/A $3,000 $5,000 $5,000 N/A $989 $5,000 N/A $37,500 $75,669 $10,000 $2,500 $10,000 $5,000 $500 $500 $1,000 $1,000 $0 N/A $43,000 GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PROJECTS $285,903 $315,669 $285,000 ITEM 3 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: · City Council · · FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE: February 13, 1996 SUBJECT: Temecula Valley In-Line Hockey Association Request ~ ha PREPARED BY: ~ wn RECOMMENDATION: D. Nelson, Director of Community Services 1) That the City Council consider a request from the Temecula Valley In-Line Hockey Association to provide a matching grant for every ~ 1.00 raised and in-kind services provided not to exceed $32,500; 2) Appropriate $32,500 to the Community Services Funding account from General Fund Reserves. BACKGROUND: At the January 23, 1996 City Council meeting, staff was directed to investigate the status of the Temecula Valley In-Line Hockey Association's (TVIHA) Roller Hockey Rink Project and provide information to the City Council regarding possible funding alternatives. On December 1, 1994, the Temecula Town Association entered into a forty (40) year lease agreement with TVIHA for $1.00 per year to provide the land necessary to construct a roller hockey rink. TVIHA has estimated that the cost of constructing the roller hockey rink is approximately $70,000. Currently, TVIHA has received a $5,000 grant from the City and has received an additional $20,000 in cash donations and in-kind construction services. As a result, TVIHA is requesting that the City Council consider providing a matching grant, dollar for dollar, in an amount not to exceed $32,500 for cash donations and in-kind donated services. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the roller hockey rink is estimated at $70,000. The City has currently awarded ~5,000 to TVIHA from the FY1994-95 Community Services Funding Program. It is requested that the remaining $65,000 be generated in the form of a matching grant, with the City's contribution not to exceed $32,500. The criteria for the matching grant is requested to include both cash donations and in-kind donated services. The cost of the grant will be funded from General Fund Reserves. ITEM 32 CITYMANAGER~/~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA. AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Directo~2~'' February 13, 1996 Direction on the Development of a Sign Ordinance Committee Prepared By: RECOMMENDATION: David W. Hogan, Senior Planner Staff recommends that the Council consider Option I, the creation of a sign ordinance committee to help staff in developing a locally appropriate sign ordinance. BACKGROUND The City adopted its new General Plan and Development Code in 1993 and 1995, respectively. The next major development control that needs to be updated and made locally appropriate is a City Sign Ordinance. The purpose of this Agenda Report is to get Council direction on the need for a Committee to help staff prepare an ordinance for the Planning Commission's and City Council's consideration. DISCUSSION Staff has already started investigating alternative signage. The key question for staff, however, is the composition and degree of community involvement in preparing the new ordinance. The options described below all take a different approach to community participation. In each alternative, it is envisioned that staff would draft the ordinance, and that the Commission and Council would review the requirements and standards during several public hearings. The key question is the level of pre-hearing public participation used to develop the new sign ordinance. Three major alternatives are as follows. Appoint a committee, which represents the entire community, to provide direction for and comments on the future sign ordinance. The Committee would work with Community Development Department staff on a proposed ordinance before it is presented to, and considered by, the City Planning Commission and Council. It is also recommended that the composition of the Committee reflect the wider community, not just local business interests. This process would be similar to the approach used to create the new development code. R:\SIGNCOMM\SIGNCOM.CC12/5~96 dwh I II. III. Staff suggests that a Committee composed of the following be considered by the Council. 0 0 0 0 0 0 One City Councilmember; One Planning Commissioner; Two representatives from local businesses; One commercial property manager or realtor; One representative from the Chamber of Commerce; and Five interested residents of the City who are appointed by the Council and do not have .significant local business affiliations. Staff prepares a discussion draft of the sign ordinance and holds several community meetings and workshops with interested parties before the ordinance is considered by the Commission and Council. This approach is similar to the process used to develop the City's temporary sign ordinances in so far that only directly affected individuals are likely to participate. Have staff work directly with the Commission and Council on the new City sign ordinance. Staff would prepare a draft ordinance for the Commission and Council's consideration. Community input would be limited to the public hearing process. This process is similar to the ordinance preparation process for noncontroversial and relatively minor City regulatory activities. CONCLUSION An appropriate sign ordinance is a key determinate of the future character and quality of a community. However, sign regulations also have a potential to create local controversy. This is because adequate signage is often perceived as the key to a successful business. As a result, staff recommends that the Council consider Option I, or any other approach that maximizes community input and involvement. FISCAL IMPACT This work activity is part of the Community Development Department's 1995-96 Budget. Because the cost of developing this project is included in the budget, the overall fiscal impact to the City should be minimal. R:\SIGNCOMM\SIGNCOM.CC1 2~5~96 dwh 2