The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About052201 CC AgendaIIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title Iii AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MAY 22, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 11:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City. The following case will be discussed: 1) Southern California Association of Governments, et al vs. Bornstein, et al. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning acquisition of right-of-way affecting Assessor's Parcel Numbers 921-320-009 and 921-320-015, on Rancho California Road, east of Ynez Road. Under negotiation is the price and terms of the real property interests. The City negotiators are Shawn Nelson and Jim O'Grady. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Erika Weitzel Pastor David Shirley of Church on the Rock Councilman Stone Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Cemerchero Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2001-06 Resolution: No. 2001-31 R:~Agenda\052201 1 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS National Public Works Week Proclamation Certificate of Achievement to Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School's Swim Team Cer[ificate of Achievement to Temecula Middle School Swim Team Youth of the Year Award - Lori DiGiacomo Leukemia and Lymphoma Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter no__t listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City CIerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENTCALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motiontowaivethereading ofthete~ ofallordinances andresolutionsincludedinthe agenda. R:~Agenda\052201 2 3 4 5 6 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of February 13, 2001; 2.2 Approve the minutes of February 27, 2001; 2.3 Approve the minutes of March 6, 2001. Resolution approvinci List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report as of March 31,2001 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31,2001. American Le.qion - Boys' State Program RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Allocate $2,000 for two Temecula High School students for the American Legion- Boys' State Program. Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Initiation of Actions Necessary to Foreclose Delinquent Special Tax Liens RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT R:~Agenda\052201 3 8 9 10 SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL Acceptance of Certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-5 (located north of Rancho California Road, east of Margarita Road, west of Meadows Parkway, south of La Serena Way and within the Marqarita Villaqe Specific Plan No. 199 -Temeku Hills Subdivision} RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-5) Parcel Map No. 29821 (located at 43172 Business Park Drive) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29821 in conformance with the conditions of approval. Acceptance of an Easement Deed for a Meandering Sidewalk along Rancho Way with a portion within Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 19580 (located at the southeast corner of Rancho Way and Business Park Drive) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED FOR A MEANDERING SIDEWALK ALONG RANCHO WAY WITH A PORTION WITHIN PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19580 AS REQUIRED PER THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0367 Quitclaim Vehicular Access Easement (located within Tract Map No. 23125-1 throuqh Residential Lot 29 and Open Space Lot 43 from Calle Morita to Buttedield Staqe Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\052201 4 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE QUITCLAIM OF A VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE UNDERLYING FEE OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23125-1 THROUGH RESIDENTIAL LOT 29 AND OPEN SPACE LOT 43 FROM CALLE MORITA TO BU'I-FERFIELD STAGE ROAD 11 Acceptance of Certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-2 (located north of Rancho California Road, east of Marqarita Road, west of Meadows Parkway1 south of La Serena Way and within the Marqarita Villaqe Specific Plan No. 199 - Temeku Hills Subdivision). RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-2) 12 Amendment to Professional Services Aqreement - Inspection Services - Various Projects RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Survey Services Agreement with Vali Cooper and Associates, Inc. for an amount equal to $24,640 and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment. 13 Liqht Emittinq Diode (LED) Traffic Si.qnal Conversion Proqram - Proiect No. PW01-03 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for an amount of $55,984.94 for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program - Project No. PW01-03; 13.2 Approve a budget transfer of $36,000.00 from Capital Project Reserves - Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening at 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program. R:~Agenda\052201 5 14 Completion and Acceptance Citywide P.C.C. Repair Proqram for FY00-01 - Proiect No. PW00-17 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Accept the project Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program for FY00-01 - Project No. PW00-17 as complete; 14.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 14.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 15 Authorize a Temporary Partial Street Closure on Old Town Front Street for Old Town Temecula Street Paintinq Festival on June 2 and 3, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A PARTIAL STREET CLOSURE ON OLD TOWN FRONT STREET FOR THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL ON JUNE 2 AND 3, 2001 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT 16 Acceptance of Certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-1 (located north of Rancho California RoadI east of Marqarita Road, west 17 of Meadows Parkway, south of La Serena Way and within the Marqarita Villaqe Specific Plan No. 199 -Temeku Hills Subdivision). RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-1) Roripauqh Specific Plan - Proiect Update RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Receive and file report. R:~Agenda\052201 6 18 Request for Wa ver of Application Filin,q Fee for PA01-0147 RECOMMENATION: 18.1 Waive application filing fee for PA01-0147. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:~Agenda\052201 7 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2001-08 Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Direotors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and flied with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 6, 2001. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 12, 2001, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\052201 8 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2001-03 Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item no~t on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 6, 2001. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 12, 2001, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:",Agenda\052201 9 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 19 Weed Abatement Liens for FY 2000-01 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION COUNCIL BUSINESS 20 Prima Facie Speed Limit on Certain Streets 21 RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(D) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) HONORS DRIVE BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND TEE DRIVE AND 2) TEMEKU DRIVE BETWEEN TEE DRIVE AND LA SERENA WAY Award the Construction Contract for Project No. PW01-07 - FY2000-01 - Slurry Seal Project RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Receive an oral report on the bids received May 17, 2001; 21.2 Award a construction contract for FY2000-01 Slurry Seal Program and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; R:~Agenda\052201 10 21.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of 10% of the contract documents. 22 Loud Party Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.18 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING LIABILITY TO PERSONS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOUD OR UNRULY ASSEMBLIES WHICH CAUSE DISTURBANCES OF THE PEACE AND PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH ASSEMBLIES DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY A'I-rORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, June 12, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\052201 11 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ~-'~ 0'~ ~'~ =~. = ~n-~ ~ ~-0 r~ -~ ~ -~, ~ ~= ~ ~ ~ ~ '80 ~ ~8 n ~ ~ o~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY t3, The City Council convened in Closed Session at 5:30 P.M. and convened in a regular meeting at 7:04 P.M., on Tuesday, February 13, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero Absent: Councilmember: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Matthew Kim, pianist, accompanied by his teacher Ms. Suzanne Cloutier. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Ben Wikner of Providence Orthodox Presbyterian Church. ALLEGIANCE The salute to the Flag was led by Councilman Pratt. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Five-year Service Awards Mayor Comerchero awarded the five-year pins to Mr. Tom Edwards, Mr. Henry Miller, Mr. Andrew Webster, and Mr. Billy Blair. Certificates of Achievement to the Junior Olympic Award recipients Commending the recipients on a job well done, Mayor Comerchero presented Certificates of Achievement to the following individuals: Jesse Lopez Ryann Bell Benjamin Bradshaw Brett Campfield Drake Woodside Kody Carr Nate Koch PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Ms. Charlotte Fox, 32800 Hupa Drive, thanked Community Services Director Parker for his cooperation and assistance in establishing free home-gardening classes for this community, noting that the classes have been very successful. R:\Minutes\021301 1 B. Referencing his concerns with regard to growth management and the need to provide infrastructure prior to the approval of developments, Mr. Chris Pedersen, 31052 Wellington Circle, announced that a referendum process will be initiated to address issues of concern with regard to the Wolf Creek project. C. Briefly commenting on the annual report for the Operation School Bell program sponsored through the Assistance League of Temecula Valley, Ms. Maryann Edwards, 42913 Calle Londe, introduced the new League President, Ms. Louise Ball, who further commented on the number of children clothed this year through this program and thanked the City Council for its support. D. Thanking the City Council for its financial support to the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), Mr. Tom Stultz, 32076 Corte Soledad, advised that the Temecula Town Association Board of Directors are in the process cf formulating a proposal for the VFW; that he will be reviewing this proposal; and that he will keep the City Council apprised. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Advising that he has met with representatives from the cities of Lake Elsinore and Murrieta with regard to the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, Councilman Naggar noted that the proposed Plan will designate 155,000 acres for habitat and endangered vegetation; that because the proposed land will affect prime developmentJsales tax generating areas, the Cities of Lake Elsinore and Murrieta will be impacted by this Plan; that additional meetings will occur to discuss potential redesignation of some of the already designated land; and that he would keep the Council apprised. B. Advising that the Executive Director of RCTA will report the Measure A survey results to the City Council at its March 27, 2001, City Council meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts noted that an extension of Measure A is being proposed, stating that the extension will include major projects on the ballot for the City of Temecula; and clarified that the City of Temecula already pays ~ cent sales tax for transportation and that the extension would merely be a 30-year continuation, not a tax increase. C. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts informed the City Council that he has, for the third year, been appointed to the National League of Cities Transportation and Infrastructure and Service Committee - a policy Committee which develops policy for all U.S. cities which are then forwarded to Congress and the President. D. In response to Mr. Pedersen's comments, Councilman Stone stated that the City has approved the proper infrastructure and mitigations along with development, including the Wolf Creek development which will be adding a 40-acre sports park, a fire station, future interchange at SR79 and 1-15, and contribution to public art. In closing, Mr. Stone briefly commented on the impacts to the City if a moratorium were imposed. E. Mayor Comerchero advised that he has been appointed to the Steering Committee of the Community and Economic Development for National League of Cities and echoed Mayor Pro Tem Roberts' comment that the City of Temecula is very unique in having two City Councilmembers represented on two different League Committees. R:\Minutes\021301 2 CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of November 28, 2000; 2.2 Approve the minutes of December 12, 2000; 2.3 Approve the minutes of December 19, 2000. 3 Resolution Approvin,q List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2000. 5 Property Insurance Renewal RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the City of Temecula Property Insurance Policy renewal with Chubb Insurance Company, Royal/Agricultural & Greenwich Insurance Companies, and Lloyd's of London for the period of February 26, 2001 through February 26, 2002 in the amount of $83,736.00. R:\Minutes\021301 3 6 Approval of 2000-2001 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 01-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET 7 Reschedulinq of March 13, 2001 City Council Meetin,q RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Direct the City Clerk to reschedule the regular City Council meeting of March 13, 2001 to March 6, 2001 and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements of the Government Code. 8 Microsoft Software Licenses RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize the purchase of 180 licenses of Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional from Ikon Office Solutions to the total amount of $27,151.28. 9 Amendment No. 1 to the Aqreement for Consultin.q Services between the City of Temecuh~ and Sandra Massa-Lavitt RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract with Sandra Massa-Lavitt for consulting services for $25,000 for a total contract amount of $50,000. 10 2001 Workers' Compensation Coveraqe Annual Renewal RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Select State Compensation Insurance Fund as the City's new Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance for Plan Year 2001. 11 Agreement for Consultin,q Services between the City of Temecula and PELA/THE ELLIOT GROUP RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the contract with PELA/THE ELLIOT GROUP for landscape plan check and inspection consulting services in the amount of $74,000.00. R:\Minutes\021301 4 12 Parcel Map No. 29642 (located north of Nicolas Road and west of Winchester Road) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29642 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 12.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. 13 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Construction Bids for the installation of a traffic signal at Margarita Road and Stonewood Road - Project No. PW00-18 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the installation of a traffic signal at Margarita Road and Stonewood Road - Project No. PW00-18. 14 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Bids for the Light Emitting D ode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program - Proiect No. PW01-03 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program - Project No. PW01-03. Mayor Comerchero informed the public that the approval of this energy-conservation measure will save the City $93,000 annually. 15 Award of Construction Contract for the Low-Flow Crossinq at Via Montezuma - Project No. PW99-15 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Award a contract for the Low-Flow Crossing at Via Montezuma - Project No. PW99- 15 to Terra-CaF Construction, Inc. for $404,587.70, contingent upon receiving resource agency permits and approved CEQA clearance, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract; 15.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $40,458.77 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 15.3 Transfer $130,000 of Capital Reserves from the Pavement Management System Project to the Low-Flow Crossing at Via Montezuma - Project No. PW99-15. R:\Minutes\021301 5 16 Professional Services Aqreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. - Diaz Road Extension and Alignment Study - Project No. PW00-10 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional engineering services for the Alignment Study for the extension of Diaz Road to the City limits and a bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek - Project No. PW00-10 for an amount not to exceed amount of $167,101.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 16.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments not to exceed the contingency amount of 10% of the contract or $16,710.10. (Pulled for separate discussion; see pages 7 - 8.) 17 First Amendment to the Reimbursement Aqreement between the City of Temecula and Eastern Municipal Water District First Street Extension - Project No. PW95-0R RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve the First Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Temecula and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) for an amount equal to $405,686.21 and authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1; 17.2 Approve an appropriation of $100,000.00 to cover the reimbursable costs from EMWD for their facilities associated with the bridge construction project; 17.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders with Riverside Construction Company for the additional amount of $100,000.00 above the previously approved 10% contingency for First Street Extension - Project No. PW95-08. 18 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 01-01 (Zoning Standards for Specific Plan No. 12 - Wolf Creek). RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO, 0t-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ZONING STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. t2, THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (PA98-0481) (Pulled for separate discussion; see pages 8 - 9.) R:\Minutes\021301 6 19 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 01-02 (Development Aqreement- Wolf Creek) RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND S-P MURDY LLC" (PA 00-0029) (Pulled for separate discussion; see pages 8 - 9.) MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 15 and 17 (Item Nos. 16, 18, and 19 were pulled for separate discussion.) The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION 16. Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. - Diaz Road Extension and Alignment Study- Project No. PW00-10 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional engineering services for the Alignment Study for the extension of Diaz Road to the City limits and a bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek - Project No. PW00-10 for an amount not to exceed amount of $167,101.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 16.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments not to exceed the contingency amount of 10% of the contract or $16,710.10. Public Works Director Hughes reviewed the staff report (of record), clarifying that the proposed agreement is a professional services selection and not a public contract; that the process for a professional services agreement provides the City discretion in the selection based on work qualifications; that the proposed firm was selected based on experience, qualifications, and staffing; and that the selection and negotiation process for the proposed firm has taken staff four months. Relaying his concern with the appearance of an impropriety, Councilman Stone stated that the Request for Proposal (RFP) specifically notes that the bid shall be returned to the City Clerk's Department; that two of the submitted three proposals followed that procedure; that the proposed firm had directly delivered the RFP to the Public Works Department; that he would suggest to readvertise for the scope of work; that the matter be delayed and reevaluated; and relayed his desire that business be given to a local firm. Councilman Naggar echoed Councilman Stone's comments, specifically with regard to giving business to local firms. Echoing PubJic Works Director Hughes' comments, City Attorney Thorson reiterated that the proposal is not a Public Works contract; reviewed the process, required by statute, for professional services agreements; and stated that the delivery of the RFP to the incorrect Department would not R:\Minutes\021301 7 invalidate the process under the professional services contract as long as it was received within the appropriate timeframe. Councilman Pratt echoed Mr. Stone's comment to rebid the contract. MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to continue the matter off calendar and to reopen the RFP for this particular project. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts. (This motion ultimately passed; see below.) Public Works Director Hughes reiterated the process for professional services agreements and noted that unless the selection process were changed, he would envision staff making the same recommendation if the matter were continued. As well echoing the comment to support local businesses, Mayor Comerchero stated that, as per the City Attorney, the proposed firm legally followed the process; commented on the amount of staff work involved in rebidding this project; and, therefore, relayed his support of approving the proposal as presented. For Councilman Pratt, Public Works Director Hughes advised that all 'three submittals had qualifications that would be acceptable for the type of work being requested; and that staff made an independent and unbiased evaluation and based its decisions on the firm's ability to perform the requested work. At this time, voice vote on the previously motion reflected approval with the exception of Mayor Comerchero who voted no. 18 Second Readinq of Ordinance No. 01-01 (Zoning Standards for Specific Plan No. 12 - Wolf Creek) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO, 01-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ZONING STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 12, THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (PA98-0481) 19 Second Readin,q of Ordinance No. 01-02 (Development Aqreement - Wolf Creek) RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 0t-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND S-P MURDY LLC (PA 00-0029) R:\Minutes\021301 8 Mr. Sam Alhadeff, 41530 Enterprise Circle South, advised that he was present to respond to any questions regarding this matter. Mr. Mark Bailey, 44763 Calle Banuelas, representing Temecula Valley Pop Warner Football, relayed his support of the Wolf Creek project as well as his support of some inconveniences for the construction of a sports park. Mr. Bailey as well commented on the construction of a fire station as a result of this development. A letter of support for Wolf Creek was submitted by Mr. Doug Hasserot, President of Temecula Club Soccer; Ms. Linda Wyman, President of Temecula Valley Pop Warner Football; and Ms. Mary E. Martinez, President of Temecula Valley Little League. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve the staff recommendation, including the adoption of Ordinance No. 01-01 and 01-02. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts. (This motion ultimately passed; see page 10.) With regard to this project, Councilman Naggar stated that the land for the sports park will actually be purchased by the City; that the construction of a future sports park should not be an issue; and that one park will either be constructed in the Wolf Creek area or in the northwest sports complex, where it was originally scheduled. Advising that he would like to vote for this project, Mr. Naggar expressed concern with regard to trading a sports park for no schools, lack of electricity, cumulative traffic impacts that have not been properly addressed. Addressing Councilman Naggar's comments, Councilman Stone noted the following: · Traffic studies - were completed by a bonafide engineer who calculated the figures at City buildout, which reflected that with proposed improvements along Pala Road and with Casino expansion, there will be a 30% excess capacity on the Pala Road Corridor; · School fees - developer is paying the State-mandated fees for schools and, as per the City Attorney, the City may not deny this project based on school fees; · Electricity - this is a State problem; that this project will not be built out for another five to six years; that these homes will not make a significant difference in the electricity problem. Concurring with Abraham Lincoln's philosophy "You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by evading it today," Councilman Pratt read into the record his letter (copies provided to the City Councilmembers) and noted that, in his opinion, the approval of this project would be violating the spirit of the CEQA because the Transportation Circulation Element has not been fully mitigated. Noting that Wolf Creek is the first village concept presented to the City, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts commented on the village core, bike ways, and transit elements. With regard to the overall project, Mr. Roberts addressed the amenities provided by this development such as the sound wall, sports park, grass-lined channel, and religious institution. He spoke in support of this quality development and noted that the project will meet the City's Growth Management Plan. Advising that this is the first Specific Plan to be considered by the City Council, Mayor Comerchero noted that the developer has been conditioned to provide infrastructure prior to the construction of the project ($17 million); referenced the 1993 traffic study in conjunction with the General Plan, noting that only a rezone/upzone would impact the figures of this study; and advised that the City upzoning has not occurred in the City but that an 8% density reduction has occurred. In closing, Mr. Comerchero noted that it is the City Council's responsibility to address impacts created by the developer and that this developer has accomplished that task. R:\Minutes\021301 9 At this time, voice vote on the previously made motion reflected approval with the exception of Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt. At 8:13 P.M., Mayor Comerchero called a short recess and convened as the Community Services District and the Redevelopment Agency and reconvened the City Council meeting at 8:52 P.M. COUNCIL BUSINESS 20 Selection of City Council Committee Assiqnments RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City Commissions and Committees and to the Pechanga Tribal Council: · Community Services Commission - Jeff Stone · Old Town Local Review Board - Sam Pratt · Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee - Ron Roberts · Planning Commission- Mike Naggar · Public/Traffic Safety Commission- Ron Roberts · Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison - Ron Roberts, Jeff Comerchero 20.2 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following external committees: (5-0-0) MN/JS · City of Murrieta Liaison (2 Members) - Jeff Comerchero, Ron Roberts · County General Plan Update Committee - RCIP - Jeff Comerchero · French Valley Airport Committee (2 Members) - Mike Naggar, Sam Pratt · League of California Congress - Voting Delegates (Member and Alternate) - Jeff Comerchero (Alternate Ron Roberts) · Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan Committee - Mike Naggar · Murrieta Creek Advisory Board (Member and Alternate) - Sam Pratt (Alternate Jeff Stone) · National League of Cities Annual Congress - 2001 Voting Delegate (Member and Alternate) - Jeff Comerchero (Alternate Ron Roberts) · Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency- Mike Naggar · Riverside County Transpodation Commission (Member and Alternate) - Ron Roberts (Alternate Jeff Comerchero) · Riverside Transit Agency Representative (Member and Alternate) - Jeff Comerchero (Alternate Sam Pratt) · Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors - Ron Roberts ........................... ~ .............................. ~ ............ ~ - Delete · Trails Master Plan Development Committee - Mike Naggar · WRCOG Representative- Ron Roberts r~,,~,,,~,,,~ _ Delete R:\Minutes\021301 10 20.3 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Advisory Committees: (5-0-0) JS/SP · Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Committee - Mike Naggar, Jeff Stone · Economic Development/Old Town Steering Committee- Ron Roberts, Jeff Comerchero · Finance Committee - Mike Naggar, Jeff Stone · Joint City Council/Temecula Valley Unified School District Committee - Ron Roberts, Mike Naggar · Library Task Force - Ron Roberts, Jeff Stone · Old Town Temecula Community Theater Ad Hoc Committee/Theater Advisory Committee - Jeff Comerchero, Sam Pratt · Public Works/Facilities Committee- Ron Roberts, Jeff Stone 20.4 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Council Subcommittees: {$-0-0) MN/JS · City's General Plan Update Committee - {This subcommittee will be deleted upon formation of the General Plan Steering Committee) - Jeff Comerchero, Mike Naggar · Children's Museum Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Jeff Comerchero, Ron Roberts · Development Overlay Subcommittee ~e~,e~,~e¢~ - Jeff Comerchero, Mike Naggar · Electrical Needs Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Jeff Comerchero, Mike Naggar · Lennar Project Subcommittee - Ron Roberts, Sam Pratt · Roripaugh Ranch Annexation Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Ron Roberts, Jeff Comerchero · SAF-T-NET Subcommittee (one Councilmember and one Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner) ~ - Jeff Stone · Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Jeff Stone Jeff Comerchero · Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee- Jeff Comerchero, Jeff Stone · Water Park Subcommittee - Mike Naggar, Jeff Comerchero · Villages of Old Town Ad Hoc Committee (Proposed Addition) - Mike Naggar, Ron Roberts Separately addressing each appointment, the following motions were offered: MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve the appointments to staff recommendation 20.1 as noted on page 10. The motion was seconded by Mayor Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve the appointments to staff recommendation 20.2 as modified and noted on pages 10-11. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve the appointments to staff recommendation 20.3 as noted on page 11. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\Minutes\021301 11 MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve the appointments to staff recommendation 20.4 as modified and noted on page 11. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 21 City Council Meetinq Adiournment Time (Requested by Councilman Stone) RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Provide direction to staff whether to amend Ordinance No. 95-07 regarding the time of adjournment for City Council meetings. Reviewing the staff report (of record, as per his request), Councilman Stone noted that it is difficult and a disservice to make important decisions for the City late in the evening and, therefore, is requesting that the adjournment time be amended to 11:00 P.M. Concurring with Councilman Stone, Councilman Naggar supported the 11:00 P.M. adjournment time, requesting that an item not be rushed. Mr. Stone noted that an item may always be continued for further discussion. Supporting the idea of adjourning the City Council meetings at 11:00 P.M., Mayor Comerchero as well concurred that an item should not be rushed and reiterated that an item may be continued for fudher discussion and additional input. Encouraging each City Councilmember to familiarize himself with Resolution No. 94-79 (Rules of Order), Mayor Comerchero promoted the adherence to this resolution in an effort to shorten the length of the City Council meetings. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to amend the Ordinance to reflect a City Council meeting adjournment time of 11:00 P.M. and to require a unanimous City Council vote to extent the time of adjournment. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 22 Additional Police Officers - Stop Li,qht Abuse Pro,qram (SLAP) RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Provide direction regarding the Stop Light Abuse Program. Reviewing the various methods of enfomement, Public Works Director Hughes highlighted the staff report (as per agenda material). Supporting deferring the discussion of hiring additional police officers to the budget process, Councilman Stone suggested that the five motor officers function as an organized task force twice a week between the hours of 7:00 A.M. - 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. at risk intersections, requesting that this action be effective on March 1, 2001. Concurring with Councilman Stone's suggestions, Councilman Naggar relayed his opposition to photo enforcement, noting that the running of red lights may be created by the City's lack of traffic mitigation. R:\Minutes\021301 12 Mayor Comerchero relayed his support of Councilman Stone's comments with the addition of photo enforcement, noting that this is a City issue which must be addressed. Not concurring with Councilman Naggar's comment that individuals are running red lights because the City has provided a lack of traffic mitigations, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts apprised the Council and public that the Metro Link utilizes photo enforcement; that such enforcement is a deterrent; that he would concur with a demonstration project; and that he as well supports Mr. Stone's comments. Even if it were accurate that the City did not provide sufficient traffic mitigations, Mayor Comerchero noted that it does not give an individual the right to run red lights. Having recently attended a City of Brea Downtown Tour, Mayor Comerchero commented on the signs displayed at each major intersection Red Light Violation $271 and requested that such signs be posted throughout the City. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to receive and file the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's report; to direct staff to evaluate additional hiring of Police Officers during the budget process; to meet with the Police Chief and members of the Commission and a motor officers to create an organized task force program for all major intersections, effective March 1, 2001; to install Red Light Violation $271 signs at all major intersections; to investigate the feasibility and legality of installing photo enforcement in an effort to eliminate red light running; and to request bimonthly reports from the Police Department with regard to red light ticketing. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Naggar who opposed photo enforcement. 23 Electric Power Emerqency Building Moratorium (Placed on the Agenda at the request of Councilman Pratt) RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Councilman Pratt has requested that this item be considered by the City Council. Referencing his letter of February 13, 2001 (of record), Councilman Pratt clarified his request for a moratorium, noting that the proposed moratorium should include commercial and manufacturing. Although Councilman Pratt's actions are well intentioned, Councilman Stone noted that the electricity issue is a State issue and that if a member of the Southern California Edison Company were to address the City Council and indicate an emergency situation, a moratorium could be established on an emergency level to mitigate the situation. City Attorney Thorson advised that for the approval of a moratorium, the City Council would have to make a finding that there is a genuine health and safety problem. Although not supporting a moratorium, Councilman Naggar requested that the Wolf Creek project be conditioned that if a finding were made with regard to the genuine health and safety of the public. Mr. Naggar relayed that, in his opinion, the City's Growth Management Plan is not effective. Strongly disagreeing with Councilman Naggar, Mayor Comerchero noted that, in his opinion, the Growth Management Plan is effective, noting that Temecula Ridge Apartments is a better project as a result of this Plan; and that the Wolf Creek project is the poster child for the Plan. R:\Minutes\021301 13 Addressing the electricity issue, Mayor Comerchero noted that instituting a moratorium would not accomplish a resolution to the matter. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts relayed his dismay with the continual mentioning of a moratorium and noted that he could possibly support a moratorium with regard to the electricity issue if it were imposed on the entire State but not solely for the City of Temecula. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to receive and file Councilman Pratt's report. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Nelson advised that at the February 27, 2001, City Council meeting, staff will be bringing forth an amendment to the existing agreement with the County of Riverside as it relates to the Police Department, making a recommendation to add an additional five officers in response to the Vail Ranch annexation to ensure a higher level of public service to those residents. In light of complaints he has received, Councilman Naggar recommended that it be explored whether additional Code Enforcement were necessary. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no reportable actions under the Brown Act for Closed Session. ADJOURNMENT At 9:53 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 27, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\021301 14 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 27, 2001 The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:15 P.M. and convened in a regular meeting at 7:01 P.M., on Tuesday, March 6, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero Absent: PRELUDE MUSIC Councilmember: None The prelude music was provided by the Wong Family. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Father Sean Cox of St. Thomas Episcopal Church. ALLEGIANCE The salute to the Flag was led by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Certificate of Appreciation to County Fire Chief Larry Benson Mayor Comerchero presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Fire Chief Benson for his contributions to the City. Fire Chief Benson, in return, thanked the City Council for its efforts in placing public safety at the forefront, noting that as a result of such action, the Temecula Fire Department is one of the best prepared Fire Departments in the County of Riverside. In closing, Chief Benson commended City staff on its efficiency and professionalism. Introduction of new County Fire Chief Tisdale Outgoing Fire Chief Benson introduced the newly appointed County Fire Chief, Tom Tisdale, who relayed his delight with having the opportunity to serve in the City of Temecula. Presentation of sponsorship checks to students travelinq to Sister Cities Nakayama and Voorbur.q Mayor Comerchero introduced and presented a certificate along with a $200 check to each student from Vail Middle School who will be traveling to Voorburg. Mr. Comerehero as well introduced and presented a certificate along with a $200 check to each student from Margarita Middle School who will be traveling to Nakayama. Mayor Comerchero thanked Recreation Coordinator Gilliland for her efforts associated with the Sister City Program. R:\Minutes\022701 1 Presentation by Eric Haley of the Riverside County Transportation Committee with regard to Measure A Transportation Financing Mr. Eric Haley provided an overview of Measure A Transportation funding, noting the following: That the Measure was enacted in 1988 by a 79% vote and established a $1.2 billion, 20- year program, by way of a ~ cent sales tax for County transportation improvements That the 20-year program, at this point in time, has been virtually committed That the City of Temecula is well presented by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts who will chair RCTC in 2003 for a year; by Mayor Comerchero who serves as alternate and also represents the City on RTA; and by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts who represents the City on the Southern California Regional Rail Authority. Referencing the public opinion survey (as per agenda material), Mr. Haley focused on the voters' conclusions; highlighted independent projects; commented on habitat and open space issues; and supported the various programs, noting the following: · That 65% of Riverside County voters had indicated that they would extend Measure A if it were on the ballot today · That the Measure will either be placed on the ballot on March or November of 2002 · That passage of this Measure would extend the life of the Measure for 30 years. Presentation by Temecula Valley Unified School District re,qard n,q School Facilitie~ Superintendent AIImen thanked the City Council for the opportunity to apprise it of the District's five-year School Facility Plan and introduced Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Okun and Director of Facilities Gallaher. Mr. Okun thanked the City Council and City Staff for its support and effective working relationship between the two agencies. Reviewing a presentation which was made to the Board on February 13, 2001, Mr. Okun stated the following: That the District has been very successful on obtaining State funding for schools That since the passage of Proposition lA (1998 State-wide ballot Measure), the District has received over $50 million for the construction of schools within the City That State rules as to allocation of funds for new school site construction have changed; that the change has affected the ability to obtain funding in the same manner; that the District currently has applications on file totaling over $90 million for future schools That because of the uncertainty as to when funding may be received, the construction program has been modified to meet the demand of this community; the modifications, as noted below, will result in changes in the School Facility Program; o Utilizing existing and current District classroom capacity; have sufficient classroom space available without changing to year-round education o Construction of new schools and additions to existing schools will be based on development fee balances; to maximize available funding, will construct new schools with a combination of permanent and portable buildings o District currently has 311 portable classrooms - 35% of total classrooms - that the ratio of portables does not significantly change in the five-year Plan o Use of portable classrooms provide the District to efficiently and quickly accommodate growth; economic way to provide classroom space and, in turn, extend available funding R:\Minutes\022701 2 In order for the District to obtain Level 2 State funding (able to collect up to 50% of the cost to mitigate school impacts), the District must have 25% of its classrooms in portables Five-year Plan includes the developer fee balances as well as development fees from new construction but it does not include any additional State funding for which applications have been submitted; that the Plan is based on development occurring within the City and County; that growth is important to the School District for a variety of reasons in that enrollment growth provides additional funding, noting that next year the District will receive $175 more per existing student Reviewed the timetable of construction for the elementary and middle schools Board has reviewed the Plan and is satisfied that the School District will meet the community needs. With regard to the Wolf Creek project, Mr. Okun advised that this project has two school sites; that the District has a Mitigation Agreement with the developer1 which grants the District the ability to collect maximum fees under State law; that the District also has a Purchase Agreement with the developer, which grants the District to close escrow on the two sites and pay the developer the purchase price whenever State funding is received; that funding will not be allocated from developer fee balances. Mr. Okun noted that the developer has given the District approval to grade the middle school site in advance of closing escrow. From the School District's point of view, Mr. Okun noted Wolf Creek is a favorable Development Agreement under terms and constraints under State Law; stated that portables are a fact of life; that the District will maintain a minimum of 25% portables in order to continue to qualify for Level 2 funding; that the funding difference between Level 1 and Level 2 is significant; that Wolf Creek is mitigating its impacts; and that the development of this project will not result in overcrowding. In response to Mayor Comerchero, Mr. Okun advised that if the Wolf Creek project were to not proceed (loss of $12 million in mitigation monies and title to the land), the District would experience a housing problem in the southern part of the District, noting that these schools will provide additional space beyond what the project would actually generate. For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Okun advised that according to the plans1 construction of the elementary school would begin during the 2002-2003 school year; that funding for the school has not been secured; that funding for the middle school has been secured, by way of development fee balances, if the Wolf Creek project were to proceed; and that if the project were not to proceed, the middle school would be pulled. Because of the sensitivity of these questions and the detailed information, Councilman Naggar expressed concern with being limited to three minutes to address the issues. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts thanked Mr. Okun for the factual information provided and Mr. Okun briefly reiterated funding allocation for next year for existing students ($4,883 plus $175) and new students ($4,883). For Mayor Comerchero, Mr. Okun clarified that full mitigation includes 50% (State Law) of the project's impacts, not the cost to build the school but the project's relationship to student generation. Addressing Councilman Pratt's comments, Mr. Okun advised that the Wolf Creek development will fill 80% of the classroom space, leaving an additional 20% of available space and that for the southern portion of the City, the District will negotiate a school site on the other side of the freeway to farther address housing needs. R:\Minutes\022701 3 At 8:15 P.M., Mayor Comerchero called a recess and reconvened the meeting at 8:25 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. William Griffith, 22842 Mill Creek, Irvine, addressed the referendum with regard to the Wolf Creek project, particularly with regard to comments made by Councilman Naggar, noting the following: · That the information provided by Mr. Okun with regard to school facilities is accurate · That his efforts/workings with the School District began prior to his efforts/workings with the City; that originally three school sites were proposed; that currently two school sites are proposed; that mitigation agreements (executed September 20, 2000) have been entered in order to meet State mandated development fees and have also reserved $6 million in property available to the School District for which the developer will not be reimbursed until the School District has received State monies · That the 40-acre sports park and the northwest sports park (28 acres) are not the same, noting that the City would experience an additional $5 million in development cost. In closing, Mr. Griffith stated that the Wolf Creek project is a quality project and that he will fight the referendum based on misinformation. Echoing Mr. Griffith's concerns with regard to comments made by Councilman Naggar, Mr. Camille Bahri, 15751 Rockfield Blvd., addressed traffic issues, noting that the project traffic study was circulated and approved and that project approvals are conditioned on LOS D consistent with the City's General Plan; reviewed traffic mitigation measures being proposed as a result of this project, noting that the traffic generated from outside City limits continues to create the biggest traffic problems; and questioned why as it relates to the electricity crisis, existing projects, including industrial and commercial, are not targeted. For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Bahri advised that the prepared EIR was based on the following: · 1989AD 159 Study · General Plan prepared in 1993 · Focus studies in EIR prepared in 1998-1999 · EIR has taken into account the county's new RCIP Corridor · Traffic analyses was based on conservative and old assumptions · Traffic report indicated that with ultimate improvements all associated links will property operate In response to Councilman Stone, Mr. Bahri advised that the 1993 EIR calculations, prepared for the General Plan, considered City build out; considered property purchased by Pechanga as traffic generating capacity; and considered Pechanga tripling its operation. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts clarified that the CETAP Corridor, as referenced by Councilman Naggar, has not yet been adopted. Mr. Doug Haserot, 41976 Avenida Alvardo, thanked those Councilmembers who approved Wolf Creek, commenting on the amenities provided by this project and as well thanked the Council for the approval of many positive projects. Mr. Haserto noted that Councilmembers Naggar and R:\Minutes\022701 4 Pratt, who voted in opposition to this project, also voted against a fire station, two school sites, bike trails, storm drains, widening of Pala Road, landscaping medians, 40-acre sports park, and senior housing. He encouraged that efforts spent toward a referendum would be more beneficial if spent on petitioning the County and its growth impacts on the City. Mr. Louie DiBernardo, 35925 Rancho California Road, addressed, from his point of view, the Wolf Creek project. Mr. Chris Pedersen, 31052 Wellington Circle, viewed the referendum as a democratic process; advised that he will expend efforts to ensure the citizens will have the opportunity to vote on this project; and expressed concern with the applicant's representative actions to thwart citizens from signing the referendum petitions. Mayor Comerchero relayed dismay to those individuals who are circulating petitions and are not telling the truth with regard to traffic gridlock, etc. Ms. Pamela Miod, 31995 Via Saltio, informed the Council that as she was leaving the Temecula Target store, she had noticed a City Councilmember allegedly writing a name on the petition which was not his own name. Addressing the democratic process, Ms. Michelle Anderson, 43797 Barletta Street, representing Citizens First of Temecula Valley, commented on her observance of a special interest group blocking voters from signing the referendum petition to repeal Wolf Creek. Although the District has formulated a five-year Plan, Mr. Ed Elder, 42775 San Julian, commented on the funding from Sacramento and noted that the Plan is an adequate Plan but questioned whether it would be the best Plan. Ms. May Lorah, 35555 Monte De Oro, questioned why the 400 residents surveyed for the City survey are more validated than the 2,000 signatures included in the referendum and requested that-her unincorporated area no longer be advertised as part of the City on the City's Website. Mr. Mark Bailey, 344763 Calle Banuelos, spoke in support of Wolf Creek and commented on the need for additional fields. Advising that he has had concerns relative to the Wolf Creek project since its initial review, Mr. Mark Broderick, 45501 Clubhouse Drive, appreciated the information provided this evening; noted that Wolf Creek has numerous amenities but there are impacts as well; noted that each resident should have the right to decide whether those impacts outweigh the benefits of the project; and stated that the referendum may slow the project down in order to address responsible growth. Wishing that there weren't a need for a referendum, Mr. Carl Ross, 43886 Butternut Drive, noted that, in his opinion, the matter could have been avoided had the traffic, school, and energy issues been properly addressed, stating the following: · Traffic- a condition should have been added that if traffic congestion exceeded a Level of Service D for the intersections in and around the area or on Pala Road, the issuance of building permits would be stopped · School - that if State funding were not available, the developer assure available funds for the construction of the schools · Energy - City must be a good steward as it relates to the energy situation. R:\Minutes\022701 5 Mr. Bart Buchalter, 30000 Rancho California Road, noted that no growth requires no thinking and would be taking the route of a default position. Mr. Buchalter encouraged smart growth. Concurring with Mayor Comerchero, Mr. Robert Oder, 29911 Mira Loma Ddve, questioned if the City continues to deny projects where will the children and grandchildren live. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Councilman Stone commended the Police Department on its Enforce Responsible Alcohol Consumption in Temecula Program, noting that over 100 individuals under the influence have been taken off the roads. B. Having met with Police Chief Domenoe to discuss the Stop Light Abuse Program (SLAP), Councilman Stone advised that this program will be implemented, noting that tickets ($271 violation) will be issued at targeted intersections to those individuals running red lights as well as gift certificates will be given to those individuals abiding by the law. C. Councilman Stone requested that staff be directed to proceed with the RFP process for the 40-acre sports park, noting that representatives from the Sports Council, two members from the City Council, two members from the Community Services Commission serve on a committee; and that the RFQ for the development of the new fire station proceed with two members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and two members of the City Council serve on a committee, encouraging public participation. D. Councilman Stone relayed his support of City Council's action to allocate funds to those students traveling to the City's Sister Cities, commenting on a life-time experience. E. Advising that the Commission will be addressing the Emergency Transportation Circulation Plan, Councilman Pratt encouraged the public to attend the March 22, 2001, Public Traffic Safety Commission meeting. F. In an effort to be proactive, Councilman Naggar requested that at the next Joint City Council/TVUSD Committee (comprised of Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and Councilman Naggar) discussion include the possibility of creating a task force to explore the changing of laws as it relates to school funding. G. Councilman Naggar requested that the ordinance, limiting Councilmembers to three minutes of discussion, be agendized and readdressed, viewing the amount of time as insufficient. H. In response to Councilman Naggar, Assistant City Attorney Curley commented on the signature collection process, addressing State laws, protocol to petitioning, etc., noting that if issues of hindering the signature process were to arise, the Police Department should be called. I. For Councilman Stone, Deputy City Manager Thornhill reviewed the Circulation Element of the General Plan, noting that two intersections of concern were referenced (Bedford Court and La Paz - at City build out and County)'as unsatisfactory LOS F; that measures are being explored to address those issues; and that this unsatisfactory LOS should not solely be contributed to the Wolf Creek project. J. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts informed the City Council and the audience that he has been elected to another two-year term as District 5 representative to the Southern California Association of Governments Regional Council. R:\Minutes\022701 6 K. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts noted that the Wolf Creek project was approved by the City Council and that there are many other important issues for this Council to address, encouraging the Council and the public to move on. L. Mayor Comerchero apprised the City Council that San Diego Area of Governments (SCAG) has approved joint efforts between the City and SCAG and approved a $500,000 grant to study the job housing imbalance in San Diego County and Southwest Riverside County, noting that the study will determine methods in which to retain the City's workforce in the City and San Diego's workforce living in San Diego in an effort to address the traffic on 1-15. M. Concurring with Mayor Pro Tem Roberts' comments to move on, Mayor Comerchero stated that this entire process with regard to Wolf Creek has been disheartening, voicing no objection to the democratic process but expressing concern with the distribution of misinformation. Mr. Comerchero encouraged both sides to retain a peaceful atmosphere. CONSENT CALENDAR Standard O~inance and Resolution Adoption Procedum RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motionto waivethereading ofthete~ ofallo~inancesand msolutionsincludedinthe agenda. 2 Resolution Approvin,q List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-'18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 3 County of Riverside Sheriff Contract Amendment No. 2 - Vail Ranch Annexation RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the second amendment for law enforcement services with the County of Riverside for the addition of five patrol officers. Appropriation of Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Funds RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the expenditures of $62,040 in Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds and local match funds for the purchase of police equipment. R:~t, linutes\022701 7 5 First Amendment to a L cense Agreement with Temeka Advertising for the Administration, Market n,q and Installation of the City's Direct ona "K osk" Si.qn Program RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve a first amendment to the License Agreement between the City of Temecula and Temeka Advertising for an additional five-year period for the administration, marketing, and installation of the City's directional kiosk sign program. 6 Environmental Assessment for the Murrieta Creek Crossings (EA-75) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 75 and direct staff to file the Notice of Determination. 7 Nicolas Road - Asphalt Removal and Replacement RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve a contract for removal and replacement of 6" of asphalt and installation of asphalt cap on Nicolas Road with Gueno Development Company, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $51,800.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 7.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,180.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 8 Completion and Acceptance for the FY1999-2000 Slurry Seal Program - Project No. PW00- RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Accept the project FY99-2000 Slurry Seal Program - Project No. PW00-13 - as complete; 8.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 8.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. I - 8. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At 9:42 P.M., Mayor Comerchero convened as the Community Services District and the Redevelopment Agency and reconvened the City Council meeting at 9:45 P.M. R:\Minutes\022701 8 COUNCIL BUSINESS 9 Ordinance Amending Section 2.04.020 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.020 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REVISING THE TIME AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS City Clerk Jones reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), commenting on the change of adjournment time to 11:00 P.M. and the inclusion of allowing Closed Session meetings to convene at varying times according to matters being discussed. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Roberts moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS Noadditionalinput. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT With regard to a letter sent pertaining to Morgan Hill, City Manager Nelson informed the City Council and the viewing audience that after discussions with the County, the developer has tentatively agreed to set aside $1.5 million toward improvements on SR 79 (between the interchange and Pala Road) and proceeded with a brief overview of the differences between the Morgan Hill project and the Wolf Creek project. Having spoken to the developer (High Pointe), Mayor Comerchero reiterated the developer's commitment to provide $1.5 million, noting that a meeting has been scheduled for Monday, March 5, 2001, to solidify the commitment. City Manager Nelson advised that staff will be attending the March 20, 2001, County Board of Supervisors meeting. Noting that, in his opinion, ~everal properties in AD 159, along SR 79, have not been adequately assessed to complete the ultimate improvements which then results in the City having to fund the shortfall, Councilman Naggar suggested that, if possible, it be determined what amount properties have contributed and proposed land use intensity in order to determine if an adequate amount has been assessed or if an additional assessment were necessary. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that there were no reportable actions under the Brown Act for Closed Session. R:\Minutes\022701 9 ADJOURNMENT At 10:15 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 6, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\022701 10 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 2001 The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:30 P.M. and convened in an adjourned regular meeting at 7:01 P.M., on Tuesday, March 6, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero Absent: Councilmember: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Kate Welsh. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor W. M. Rench of Calvary Baptist Church of Temecula. ALLEGIANCE The salute to the Flag was led by Councilman Stone. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Certificate of Achievement to Joshua Duvall for attaining Eagle Scout rank Mayor Comerchero presented the Certificate of Achievement to Joshua Duvall. Wall of Honor Recipient - Grace Mellman Commending Ms. Mellman on her efforts and commitment to library services for this City, Mayor Comerchero inducted Ms. Mellman as a member of the City's Wall of Honor. Honored to receive this award, Ms. Mellman as well commended the City Council, staff, and the citizens for their combined efforts of supporting the library for the City of Temecula. City Manager Nelson informed the public that Ms. Mellman as well was recently awarded by the Chamber of Commerce the Lifetime Achievement Award. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Mr. Roger Jaeger, 41325 Billy Joe Lane, commended the City on a job well done as it relates to the overall City. Mr. Jaeger apprised the Council of potential land stripping (400+ acres) located next to his property; noted that such action destroys plant and animal life in an effort to not encounter future endangered species; clarified that he is not against development but is requesting the formulation of a reasonable City policy as it relates to land stripping. Advising that he has been apprised of Mr. Jaeger's concerns and that the matter is being addressed, Mayor Comerchero noted that once the investigation is completed, a report would be provided. R:\Minutes\030601 1 Relaying his support of Mr. Jaeger's concern, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts advised that he as well has addressed the matter with Public Works Director Hughes and Deputy Public Works Director Parks, viewing land stripping not as brush control and noting that a policy change is needed. Councilman Naggar requested that Council consider reimbursing Mr. Jaeger the $351 fee he had to pay in order for the matter to be addressed. B. Thanking the dedication of a City government which supports high quality of life, living, and planned growth, Ms. Martha Minkler, P.O. Box 954, elaborated on the glories of this City which began years ago and continue to this day. C. Speaking on behalf of the defunct CRC Foundation, Ms. Melody Brunstein (past President of the Foundation), 21705 Como Street, commented on the need for parks in the southern portion of the City. D. Mr. Will Rodgers, 32124 Corte Carmona, commended Mayor Comerchero, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, and Councilman Stone on a job well done. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Advising that he had met with the newly appointed U.S. Secretary of Transportation on Saturday, March 3, 2001, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts noted that discussions included regional multi-airport utilization versus relying solely on Los Angeles Airport and high-speed rail transportation and dedicated truck lanes. B. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts informed the Council and attending audience that he will be traveling to Sacramento, on Wednesday, March 7, 2001, with the SCAG Legislative Committee for a briefing on the Regional Transportation Plan and its funding shortfalls. Mr. Roberts also advised that he had met with the Mayor of the City of Esoondido to discuss high-speed rail, noting that both the City of Temecula and the City of Escondido have stations in the Transportation Plan for the high-speed rail and that discussions included acquisition of land, payment of a station, and the holding of the land until construction of the station. It was decided to formulate a joint San Diego County/Riverside County High-Speed Rail Committee, noting that the first meeting would be in April or May and advising that the formulation of this Committee will ensure necessary discussions with the California High-Speed Rail Authority in an effort to retain the Inland route as proposed versus the coastal route. C. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts informed the Council and the audience that the City of Temecula, through the efforts of Public Works Director Hughes, may be receiving Discretionary State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds in the amount of $2.7 million, through the Riverside County Transportation Committee, for the Butterfield Stage Road (4-lane road), which is a CETAP Corridor project and which has been partially funded. Mr. Roberts stated that he would keep the Council apprised. D. Councilman Pratt reiterated the importance of the community being involved with the City's traffic and safety and encouraged the public to attend the March 22, 2001, Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. E. Commending Mayor Pro Tem Roberts for his continual efforts on behalf of the City, Councilman Stone noted that Mr. Roberts has attained a leadership role on various important committees. R:\Minutes\030601 2 F. Advising that on Friday, March 6, 2001, he had attended a workshop meeting of the Board of Directors of the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA), Mayor Comerchero noted that discussions included a 10-year strategic plan for the Transportation Plan in order to accommodate expected County growth. Expressing concern that the newly planned CETAP Corridor (Banning/HemetNVinchester/'l'emecula) was not designated as one of the primary transportation network corridors, Mayor Comerchero extended appreciation to Supervisor Venable and his district, Councilmember Marge Tandy from the City of Hemet, Councilmember Bonnie Flickinger from the City of Moreno Valley, and Councilmember Pamela Brinley from the City of Lake Elsinore, who as well supported his request to place this new corridor on the 10- year strategic plan, commending his fellow Board members. G. Mayor Comerchero as well thanked and commended Supervisor Venable for his cooperation and support with regard to the County mitigating growth impacts. Mr. Comerchero advised that Mr. Venable has spoken with the Board of Director of the Metropolitan Water District in an effort to obtain funding ($22 million) to extend the Domenigoni Parkway North to connect to Scott and Newport Roads and ultimately to 1-215. CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Resolution Approvin.q List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 01-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2001 4 Letter of Support for Inter-Regional Plannin.q Proiect RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter in support of a grant application by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to establish an inter-regional planning program for San Diego and Western Riverside Counties. R:~Minutes\030601 3 5 Award of Contract to Update the City General Plan RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Award the contract to Cotton Bridges Associates in the amount of $340,285 to assist the City in upgrading the General Plan. (Considered under separate discussion; see page 5.) 6 City Street Banner Vendor RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the contract with Kelley Display, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $33,000.00 for a 16-month term through Jun 30, 2002. Acquisition of Tax-Defaulted Property for Open Space Habitat Creation and Preservation Area and/or Public Park/Pedestrian Access Purposes RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OBJECTING TO THE PUBLIC SALE OF CERTAIN TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY FOR OPEN SPACE HABITAT CREATION AND PRESERVATION AREA AND/OR PUBLIC PARK/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS PURPOSES 8 Award of Construction Contract for the City Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase Ill Proiect No. PW00-16 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Award a contract for the City Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase III - Project No. PW00-16 to T & M Construction for $600,000 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $60,000 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 8.3 Approve a transfer of $80,000 in Capital Project Reserves from the Rainbow Canyon South Interchange Project to the City Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase III - Project No. PW00-16. R:\Minutes\030601 4 9 Award of Construction Contract for the Margarita Road Widenin,q - Phase I - Project No. PW99-01 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Award a contract for the Margarita Road Widening - Phase I - Project No. PW99-01 - to R.J. Noble Company for $1,266,140.80 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract; 9.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $126,614.08 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 9.3 Approve an appropriation of $11650,000.00 from Capital Project Reserves to the Margarita Road Widening - Phase I Project. 10 Second Readinq of Ordinance No. 01-04 (Time and Place of City Council Meetinqs) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.04.020 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF MEETINGS MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 4 and 6 - 10 (Item No. 5 were pulled for separate discussion.) The motion was seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflected unanimous. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION 5 Award of Contract to Update the City General Plan RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Award the contract to Cotton Bridges Associates in the amount of $340,285 to assist the City in upgrading the General Plan. Planning Director Ubnoske reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), including the recommended addition to the proposed recommendation, as follows: Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments up to the amount of $25,000. Councilman Pratt relayed his support of the recommendation if efforts be directed to the transportation problem. MOTION: Councilman Pratt moved to approve the staff recommendation as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At 7:38 P.M., Mayor Comerchero convened as the Community Services District and the Redevelopment Agency and reconvened the City Council meeting at 7:41 P.M. R:\Minutes\030601 5 COUNCIL BUSINESS 11 Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommendations re,qardin,q Emer,qency Traffic Circulation Plan RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Consider the recommendations of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and direct staff to begin implementation of those recommendations. Assistant City Manager O'Grady referenced the staff report (of record). Public/Traffic Safety Chairwoman Edwards highlighted the Commission's recommendations as well as work in progress (as per staff report). Councilman Pratt commended the Commission on a job well done and encouraged public participation at the March 22, 2001, Commission meeting. In response to Mayor Comerchero, City Manager Nelson confirmed that public transportation issues will be addressed as part of he Circulation Element. MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Nelson advised that the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting will be March 27, 2001, 2001. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no reportable actions under the Brown Act for Closed Session. R:\Minutes\030601 6 ADJOURNMENT At 7:48 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 27, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\030601 7 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $620,921.17. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of May, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of May, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 05/10/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/22/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/10/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 05/22/01 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASrDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL rMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 100 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA-LOW,'MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVrCES 340 FACrLITIES TOTAL BY FUND: $ 232,697.51 166,858.75 221,364.91 197,048.28 5,662.10 66,003.28 43.77 5,782.14 417.55 105,460.39 4,518.52 410.38 7,953.03 1,411.42 4,845.40 157,653.92 4,059.69 40,176.03 2,862.58 520.80 764.58 6,787.22 2,109.32 4,378.56 $ 399,556.26 221,364.91 $ 620,921.17' , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 05/10/01 12:00 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMEN? PROJ FUND TOTAL AMOUNT 49,941.20 16,619.7-3 100,297.82 166,858.75 VOUCHRE2 05/10/01 12:00 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 69178 05/22/01 69179 05/22/01 69180 05/22/01 69180 05/22/01 69181 05/22/01 69182 05/22/01 69182 05/22/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 004021 AMERICAN VINEYARD FOUND PIERCES DISEASE RESEARCH PRJT 001007 N P G CORPORATION SLURRY SEAL SKATE PARK PRK LOT 002483 PRO TECH SERVICES/PARTS REPLACE CRC POOL HEATER CORE 002483 PRO TECH SERVICES/PARTS SALES TAX 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D MARCH 2001 BOOKING FEES 004244 004244 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-101-999-5285 190-180-999-5416 190-186-999-5212 190-186-999-5212 001-170-999-5273 TRUGREEN LAND CARE PRGS PMT#2:O.T.S/S PARKING LOT 210-165-828-5804 TRUGREEN LAND CARE RET W/H PMT#2:S/S PARKING LOT 210-2035 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 36,362.00 11,005.00 5,223.00 391.73 13,579.20 111~442.03 11~144.21- PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 36,362.00 11,005.00 5,614.73 13,579.20 100,297.82 166,858.75 VOUCHRE2 05/10/01 11:15 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 13 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 147,107.08 5,662.10 49,383.55 43.77 5,782.14 417.55 5,162.57 4,518.52 410.38 7,953.03 1,411.42 4,845.40 232,697.51 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 69054 69055 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96202 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 05/04/01 05/04/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 002539 3CMA/CITY COMMUNICATION 002539 3CMA/CITY COMMUNICATION 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 PERS EMPLOYEESt RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEESt RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH IHSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH ]RSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS tEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS tEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER SAVVY AWARDS COMPETITION ENTRY 001-111-999-5250 MEMBERSHIP DUES:WOLNICK,GLORIA 001-111-999-5226 ITEM AMOUNT 240.00 350.00 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 26,807.58 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 651.49 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,749.11 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 11.61 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 415.42 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 101.44 000246 PRES RET 280-2390 282.59 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 127.82 000246 PERS RET 320-2130 26.51 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 1,192.74 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 206.19 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 589.34 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 182.91 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 96.59 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.87 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 19.07 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .05 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.82 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .36 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .92 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2590 3.72 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 1.39 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.65 000245 AETNA 001-2090 158.61 000245 AETNA 165-2090 123.68 000245 AETNA 190-2090 119.00 000245 AETNA 280-2090 41.22 000245 AETNA 340-2090 8.14 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 55.47 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 54.51 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 35.78 000245 HELTHNET 001'2090 145.43 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 31.24 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 .36 000245 KAISER 001-2090 23.43 000245 PACCARE 001-2090 119.46 000245 PACCARE 190-2090 18.59 000245 PACCARE 340-2090 2.32 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 93.56 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 1,028.80- 000245 AETNA 001-2090 3,042.39 000245 AETNA 165-2090 254.63 000245 AETNA 190-2090 1,141.99 000245 AETNA 280-2090 84.87 000245 AETNA 330-2090 97.00 CHECK AMOUNT 240.00 350.00 35,473.65 VOUCRRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 96291 138638 138638 158638 138658 138638 138638 158638 138638 138638 138638 158638 138638 138638 138638 138638 138638 138638 138638 138638 138638 138658 138638 138681 138681 138681 138681 138681 138681 138681 CHECK DATE 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/D1 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 VENDOR NUMBER 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 VENDOR NAME PERS (HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTR PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS tEALTH PERS tEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH PERS HEALTH 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 ]HSTATAX (1RS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000285 INSTATAX (IRS) 000285 INSTATAX CIRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IHS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000285 [NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (lES) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 IHSTATAX (EDD) 000444 IRSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) ITEM DESCRIPTION INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSRIELD INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHRET INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET ]HSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE INSUR. PRE 000245 PC INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000285 FEDERAL 000285 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 SDI 000444 SD! 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI ACCOUNT NUMBER 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 195-2090 194-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 540-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 320-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 244.07 1,594.12 468.53 890.72 4,922.45 1,458.56 59.18 29.59 768.95 2,322.21 4,149.17 944.84 244.62 144.45 ~38.00 4,056.44 1,028.80 291.37- 2,037.16 166.98 24,993.12 497.76 5,407.57 16.59 349.37 131.37 190.89 74.25 1,289.07 290.21 553.79 6,081.20 157.96 1,465.22 2.62 103.87 22.28 71.01 29.24 290.72 74.89 157.01 64.63 5.81 123.13 2.80 1.39 5.04 7.42 CHECK AMOUNT 30,578.15 42,248.01 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 4.19 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 6,711.48 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 135.52 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 1,203.41 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 1.94 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 60.01 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 30.48 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-20?0 54.48 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 15.34 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-20?0 283.29 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 68.84 138681 05/10/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 125.44 8,904.64 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 69058 05/10/01 003552 A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC A LAC 003552 CANCER 001-2330 357.70 003552 CANCER 190-2330 14.34 003552 CANCER 193-2330 14.34 003552 CANCER 194-2330 4.78 003552 CANCER 340-2330 14.34 003552 EXP PROT 001-2330 ' 128.30 003552 EXP PROT 190-2330 55.80 003552 EXP PROT 320-2330 27.90 003552 HOSP lC 001-2330 17.50 003552 STD 001-2330 566.40 003552 STD 190-2330 155.20 003552 BTD 193-2330 9.60 003552 STD 194-2330 3.20 003552 STD 340-2330 20.80 1,390.20 69059 05/10/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 706.03 69059 05/10/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 17.60 69059 05/10/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 89.03 69059 05/10/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310 5.58 69059 05/10/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 194-2310 1.68 69059 05/10/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 5.86 69059 05/10/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 330-2310 5.58 69059 05/10/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 42.23 873.59 69060 05/10/01 004518 ABOVE ALL COMPUTERS EE COMPUTER PRGM:R.HRUSKA 001-1175 1,?02.23 1,702.23 69061 05/10/01 000434 AOOELA.COM SQL PRGM COOING-MIGRATION SVCS 320-199-999-5250 630.00 630.00 69062 05/10/01 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING ING OLD TWN BILLBOARD AD:MAY 01 280-199-999-5362 69063 05/10/01 ADAMS BOOK GUILD BOOK:MATH OF TURF GRASS MNTC 190-180-999-5228 1,751.00 37.95 1,751.00 37.95 69064 05/10/01 002733 ALBAO, NANCY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 576.00 5?6.00 69065 05/10/01 003129 ALBERTOB REFSHMNTS:CINCO DE MAYO EVENT 190-18~-999-5371 180.00 180.00 69066 05/10/01 003?06 AMBIENT AVL INC CRC AMPITHEATER SOUND REPAIR 190-182-999-5212 135.00 69066 05/10/01 003706 AMBIENT AVL INC INSTALL:PULL LINE IN OLD TWN 001-164-603-5212 90.00 225.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69067 69068 69069 69069 69069 69069 69070 69071 69072 69073 69074 69075 69076 69077 69078 69078 69078 69078 69078 69078 69078 69078 69078 69078 69078 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/O1 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM BERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 004169 ANAHEIM ORANGE COUNTY V 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC 003126 004059 003582 BARRON, LAURA BONNAND, LAURIE BOOMG~RDEN, DENNIS BOWLEY, DAVID BROWN JR., WILLIAM E. BROWN, PASCALE 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 C GNA C GNA C GNA GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA ITEM DESCRIPTION APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CITY HALL APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MNT FAC APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:SR CTR APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CRC APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:TCC APR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MUSEUM UNIFORMS RENTAL:PW MNTC CREW UNIFORMS RENTAL:TCSD MNTC CREW CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT= TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TENP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT= TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES MEMBERSHIP:GLORIA WOLNICK TEMP HELP W/E 04/14 REID TEMP HELP W/E 04/21BRUNER TEMP HELP W/E 04/21DICLEMENTE TEMP HELP W/E 04/21 CRAMER BOTTLED WATER SVCS:MNTC FAC REFUND:SKYHAWKS FLAG FOOTBALL REFUND:GYMNASTICS-TERRIFIC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MILEAGE REIMB-PW SIGNAL TECH REFD:ARTS/CRAFTS-DRAWING CLASS OLD TWN RESTROOM RENTAL:MAY 003553 LTD 003553 LTD 003553 LTD OO3553 LTD 003553 LTD 003553 LTD OO3553 LTD 003553 LTD 003553 LTD 003553 LTD 003553 LTD ACCOUNT NUMBER 340-199-701-5250 340-199-?02-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 001-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 340-199-701-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 190-180-999-5243 001-164-601-5243 001-111-999-5226 001-120-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 190-180-999-5118 340-199-702-5250 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 001-164-602-5262 190-183-4982 280-199-999-5234 001-2380 165-2380 190-2380 192-2380 193-2380 194-2380 280-2380 300-2380 320-2380 330-2380 340-2380 ITEM AMOUNT 107.40 46.20 63.36 96.24 48.96 43.64 123.59 99.00 12,00- 12.00- 12.00- 12.00- 12.00- 12.00- 12.00- 12.00- 525.00 78.00 101.28 312.00 182.00 86.81 25.00 36.00 295.20 259.20 26.91 36.00 826.00 1,615.51 39.10 299.92 .71 26.38 6.08 17.29 7.99 66.99 13.45 37.67 CHECK AMOUNT 532.39 525.00 673.28 86.81 25.00 36.00 295.20 259.20 26.91 36.00 826.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 69078 05/10/01 003553 VENDOR NAME C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA ITEM DESCRIPTION 003553 STD OO3553 BTD 003553 STD 003553 STD 003553 STD 003553 BTD 003553 STD 003553 STD 003553 BTD 003553 STD 003553 BTD 69080 05/10/01 003138 CAL MAT PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 69081 05/10/01 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 69082 05/10/01 CAMPBELL, SARAH RECREATION SUPPLIES-TCC REFUND:GYMNASTICS-TERRIFIC 2~S 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSUP~RNCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69083 05/10/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 69084 05/10/01 004495 CHICO~S TECATE GRILL REFSHMNTS:CINCO DE MAYO EVENT 69085 05/10/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 69085 05/10/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 69085 05/10/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 69085 05/10/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 69085 05/10/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CNC 69085 05/10/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHD 69086 05/10/01 002147 COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS 69087 05/10/01 CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDAT 69088 05/10/01 D~AMBROSIO, ANGELA 69089 05/10/01 002990 69090 05/10/01 003610 69091 05/10/01 004192 69091 05/10/01 004192 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE DOMENOE, JIM DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN DO'NS COMMERCIAL FUELIN BUNNY SUIT RENTAL~4/5-4/11 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: DOG OBEDIENCE RETAIN ADVOCACY FIRM:FED FUND REIMB:BOOKS FOR SISTER CITY FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2500 165-2500 190-2500 192-2500 193-2500 194-2500 280-2500 300-2500 320-2500 330-2500 340-2500 001-164-601-5218 190-184-999-5301 190-183-4982 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 190-183-999-5371 001-2120 190-2120 193-2120 194-2120 330-2120 340-2120 190-183-999-5320 190-2900 190-183-4982 001-110-999-5248 001-170-999-5250 001-163-999-5263 001-161-999-5263 ITEM AMOUNT 2,254.98 54.57 418.65 .99 36.81 8.49 24.15 11.15 93.49 18.78 52.59 1,920.36 25.70 36.00 645.13 13.01 133.26 .33 12.68 2.59 6.49 3.24 26. O0 9.75 18.52 269.38 123.50 5.60 .60 .20 5.50 .60 107.50 100.00 68.00 2,000.00 163.19 265.18 208.00 CHECK AMOUNT 5,105.74 1,920.36 25.70 36.00 871.00 269.38 136.00 107.50 100.00 68.00 2,000.00 163.19 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 69091 05/10/01 69091 05/10/01 69091 05/10/01 69091 05/10/01 69091 05/10/01 69092 05/10/01 69093 05/10/01 69093 05/10/01 69093 05/10/01 69094 05/10/01 69094 05/10/01 69095 05/10/01 69096 05/10/01 69096 05/10/01 69097 05/10/01 69097 05/10/01 69097 05/10/01 69097 05/10/01 69097 05/10/01 69098 05/10/01 69099 05/10/01 69100 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69i01 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69101 05/10/01 69102 05/10/01 VENDOR NAME 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 004192 DO'NS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 000517 ENTENMANN ROVIN & COMPA 000517 ENTENMANN ROVIN & COMPA 000517 ENTENMANR ROVIN & COMPA 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN FALLBRODK HOSPITAL 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST 8ANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 003347 FIRST BAHKCARD CENTER 004239 FISHER MERRIMAN SEHGAL FORMOE, GARY G. 000795 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 00017-/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 00017-/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENN[ES OFF[CE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 0001~7 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 69103 05/10/01 002372 GUSTAFSON, LINDA HARMON, JUDY ITEM DESCRIPTION FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:C.HALL BADGE CASE FOR JEFF STONE FREIGHT SALES TAX OLD TWN FIRST ST BRDG CEREMONY SALES TAX REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT LOT BOOK REPT: JACOBS LOT BOOK REPT: SWALWELL X-7824 COMERCHERO:CF-SUPPLIES X-7824 COMERCHERO:CF-SUPPLIES X-6165 YATES:PROF MTG-SUPPLIES X-6165 YATES:PROF MTG-SUPPLIES X-6165 YATES:PROF MTG-SUPPLIES REIMB:DESIGN OLD TWN THEATER REIMB:ACCELA CF:4/30-5/4:RENO COMMUNICATOR SEM:4/4:SALAZAR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MCR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY CLRK MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-COPY CTR PANOSONIC TRANSCRIBER:CITY CLK SALES TAX MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-HR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNING MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-B&S MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-RDA/LO~-M MISC OFFICE SUPPL[ES-RDA/LOW-M MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-INF SYS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-REC MGMT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-REC MGMT REFUND:SKYHAWKS FLAG FOOTBALL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ACCOONT NUMBER 001-162-999-5263 001-120-999-5262 001-165~999-5263 001-164-601-5263 001-164-604-5263 340-199-701-5212 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-I00-999-5220 280-199-807-5801 280-199-807-5801 190-2900 165-199-999-5250 165-199-999-5250 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5220 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5265 001-150-999-5265 210-190-167-5802 001-162-999-5258 001-162-999-5261 001-110-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 001-120-999-5242 001-120-999-5242 001-140-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 165-199-999-5220 280-199-999-5220 320-199-999-5221 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5330 ITEM AMOUNT 171.47 29.10 248.23 390.54 25.21 59.54 35.00 8.00 2.~ 325.00 24.38 100.00 150.00 150.00 884.11 11.60 90.07 161.68 523.00 841.19 170.90 159.00 250.62 69.16 201.69 24.77 398.00 29.85 140.65 128.79 191.30 399.48 25.08 25.08 169.15 40.38 403.08 25.00 425.60 CHECK AMOUNT 1,337.73 59.54 45.63 349.38 100.00 300.00 1,670.46 841.19 170.90 159.00 2,497.08 25.00 425.60 VOUCHRE2 05/10/01 11:15 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 7 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 69104 05/10/01 002107 RIGHMARN 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMAHK 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARN INC 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMAHK 69104 05/10/01 002107 HIGHMARK 69105 05/10/01 001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & 69106 05/10/01 004217 HYDRO TEK COMPANY 69106 05/10/01 004217 HYDRO TEK COMPANY 69107 05/10/01 69107 05/10/01 69107 05/10/01 69107 05/10/01 69107 05/10/01 69107 05/10/01 69107 05/10/01 69108 05/10/01 69109 05/10/01 69110 05/10/01 69111 05/10/01 69111 05/10/01 69112 05/10/01 69113 05/10/01 69114 05/10/01 69115 05/10/01 69116 05/10/01 69117 05/10/01 69117 05/10/01 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT THUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT THUS 003319 INLAND ENTERTAINMENT RO 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL JACOBS, KATHLEEN 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS 003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE LARDNER, CYNTHIA 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN ITEM DESCRIPTION 002107 VL REVER 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VL ADVAN 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE SALES TAX RECOVERY FEES PRESSURE WASHER REPAIR KIT SALES TAX 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMp 000194 DEF COMP OLD TUN DISPLAY ADS:RDA EVENTS POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS REFD:ARTS/CRAFTS-DRA~ING CLASS NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES BIOLOGICAL SVCS:PALA RD BRIDGE CONSULTING SVCS:PUJOL ST DEVEL HP PRINTER MAINTENANCE SVC REFUND:TENNIS-INTR./ADV.ADULT RESHEETING STREET SIGNS FOR PW TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2510 340-2510 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2510 340-2510 001-140-999-5248 001-164-601-5215 001-164-601-5215 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 280-199-999-5362 190-186-999-5250 190-183-4982 320-199-999-5248 320-199-999-5248 210-165-631-5801 165-199-999-5250 320-199-999-5215 190-183-4982 001-164-601-5244 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 ITEM AHOUNT 227.50- 207.00 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 228.90 208.40 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 185.69 319.50 6.53 2,800.47 445.85 368.12 40.00 16.50 165.01 50.00 213.75 221.99 72.00 527.38 723.64 782.00 2,290.92 396.65 55.00 97.83 462.00 168.00 CHECK AMOUNT 457.80 185.69 326.03 3,885.95 213.75 221.99 72.00 1,251.02 782.OD 2,290.92 396.65 55.OO 97.83 630.OO 69118 05/10/01 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS APR SPORTS PRGM UMPIRE SVCS 190-187-999-5250 194.00 VOUCHRE2 05/10/01 11:15 CITY OF TEMECULA VO[JCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 8 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER BATE 69118 05/10/01 69118 05/10/01 69119 05/10/01 69120 05/10/01 69120 05/10/01 69120 05/10/01 69120 05/10/01 69120 05/10/01 69120 05/10/01 69120 05/10/01 69120 05/10/01 69121 05/10/01 69121 05/10/01 69121 05/10/01 69121 05/10/01 69122 05/10/01 69123 05/10/01 69124 05/10/01 69125 05/10/01 69126 05/10/01 69127 05/10/01 69128 05/10/01 69128 05/10/01 69129 05/10/01 69130 05/10/01 69131 05/10/01 69132 05/10/01 69132 05/10/01 69132 05/10/01 69132 05/10/01 69132 05/10/01 69133 05/10/01 69134 05/10/01 69135 05/10/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS 000217 MARRARITA OFFICIALS ASS NAZUREK, TERESA 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE CONP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI 003574 MORAMARCOw ANTHONY d. MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF MORINw ROGERT 004390 NATELSON C(~4PANY 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN 001171 ORIENTAL TRAOING COMPAN 002297 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONS PAGEL, TERESA PEFFERS, GAYLE 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS 001880 PELI GUARD PROOUCTB 001880 PELI GUARD PROOUBTS 001880 PELf GUARD PROOUCTS 001880 PBLI GUARD PRODUCTS 001958 PEAS LONG TERM CARE PRO PICARD, CATHERINE POWERS & POWERS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER APR SPORTS PROM UMPIRE SVCS APR SPORTS PRGM UMPIRE SVCS REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MSOl-0312 190-2900 003076 DENTALML 001-2340 003076 DENTALML 165-2340 003076 DENTALML 190-2340 003076 DENTALML 193-2340 003076 DENTALML 194-2340 003076 DENTALML 280-2340 003076 DENTALML 330-2340 003076 DENTALML 340-2340 30 DEGREE ENTRY PANEL-PARKS CANOPY FOR CYCLONE SLIDE-PARKS FREIGHT SALES TAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS LEAGUE MTG:5/14/O1:R.ROBERTS REFUND:CPR TRAINING/FIRST AID 190-183-4982 WATER PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY APR DISPLAY ADS:VAR CONST UPDT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TCC SUPPLIES FOR TCSD KITE DAY NAR CONSULT SVCS:TRADING POST REFUND:SKYHAWKS FLAG FOOTBALL 190-183-4982 REFUND:MARTIAL ARTS - TAI CHI 190-183-4982 UNIFORMS FOR LIFEGUARD STAFF FEMALE LIFEGUARD UNIFORMS 407 SUNSCREEN FREIGHT SALES TAX 001958 PEAS L-T 001-2122 REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-DRAWING CLS HR MOMT COURSE:5/16,22,24:BG 190-187-999-5250 190-187-999-5250 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-183-999-5330 001-100-999-5260 210-190-170-5802 001-165-999-5256 001-163-999-5214 190-184-999-5301 190-183-999-5371 210-190-165-5804 190-186-999-5243 190-186-999-5243 190-186-999-5243 190-186-999-5243 190-1~-999-5243 190-183-4982 001-150-999-5261 ITEM AMOUNT 2,314.00 286.00 100.00 3,986.7'5 200.93 687.56 61.12 5.44 100.45 18.15 130.60 170.00 386.00 54.93 41.71 288.00 28.00 68.00 2,000.00 533.80 31.15 111.15 52.80 1,445.00 25.00 25.00 720.00 360.00 58.20 12.00 85.37 113.98 36.00 255.00 CHECK AMOUNT 2,794.00 100.00 5,190.98 652.64 288.00 28.00 68.00 2,000.00 533.80 31.15 163.95 1,445.00 25.00 25.00 1,235.57 113.98 36.00 255.00 VOUDHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 69136 05/10/01 69136 05/10/01 69156 05/10/01 69137 05/10/01 69138 05/10/01 69139 05/10/01 69140 05/10/01 69140 05/10/01 69140 05/10/01 69140 05/10/01 69140 05/10/01 69140 05/10/01 69140 05/10/01 69140 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69141 05/10/01 69142 05/10/01 69143 05/10/01 69144 05/10/01 69145 05/10/01 69146 05/10/01 69147 05/10/01 69148 05/10/01 69149 05/10/01 69150 05/10/01 VENDOR NAME 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRINT FINISHING SOLUTIO 002485 PRO TECH SERVICES/PARTS RAJEC, OLGA 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB 000728 RAMSEY BADKFLOW & PLUMB 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB 000728 RANSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER D[ST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 003517 000526 001365 000268 001592 RAUTERKUS, LYNN REBEL EQUIPMENT RENTAL REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY 0 RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT RIVERSIDE CO INFO TECHN RODRIGUEZ~ JUDITH SCUDDER, KJkRA SINGSON, INOCENCIA ITEM DESCRIPTION AUG VAR PUBLIC NTCS:PLANNING VAR RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR DPT VAR RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR DPT ROTATRIM 36" TRIMMER FOR GIS REPAIR CRC POOL HEATER REFUND:TENNIS-INTR/ADV ADULT S-14 MIRADA BACKFLOW REPAIR S-13 PRESLEY BACKFLOW REPAIR S-12 VINTAGE HILLS BCKFLW RPR S-12 VINTAGE HILLS BCKFLW RPR S-12 VINTAGE HILLS BCKFLW RPR S-8 VILLAGES BCKFLW REPLACEMNT S-15 BARCLAY BACKFLOW REPAIR VAR PARK SITES BCKFLW REPAIRS MAY 01-08-00038-1 PALA RD APR 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL ST VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS APR VARIOUS WATER METERS APR VARIOUS WATER METERS APR VARIOUS WATER METERS REFUND:SKYHAWKS FLAG FOOTBALL VARIOUS PARK EQUIPMENT RENTAL MAP ACT SEM:6/15/O1:C.JIMENEZ RENEW ANNUAL PERMIT:TEMEKU PRK APRIL 2001 K-RAT PAYMENT ANNUAL MAILING.SVCS:AGENDAS REFUND:MUSIC-INSTANT PIANO REFUND:GYMNASTICS-TERRIFIC 2'S REFUND:SPORTS-BB FUND INT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-161-999-5256 001-150-999-5254 001-150-999-5254 001-161-610-5220 190-186-999-5250 190-183-4982 193-180-999-5212 195-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 195-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-165-999-5250 280-199-807-5801 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-18/*-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 001-164-603-5240 001-165-999-5250 210-165-828-5804 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5238 001-163-999-5261 190-180-999-5250 001-2300 001-161-999-5256 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 ITEM AMOUNT 57.00 2,707.05 1,420.76 564.38 656.38 55.00 85.00 170.00 106.00 92.00 380.00 410.00 89.00 965.00 174.60 42.73 4,T57.33 94.20 484.06 144.94 170.85 2,168.76 373.30 55.46 224.50 127.96 40.51 25.00 22.40 295.00 65.00 826.92 95.00 20.00 36.00 40.00 CHECK AMOUNT 4,184.81 564.38 656.38 55.00 2,297.00 8,839.18 25.00 22.40 295.00 65.00 826.92 95.00 20.00 36.00 40.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUEHER/ CHEEX NUMSER 69151 69152 69153 69153 69155 69153 69153 69153 69153 69153 69153 69153 69153 69153 69153 69154 69154 69154 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 SKYE GRAPHICS 003804 SKYHAWKS SPORTS AC~J)EMY 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST COHTR ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER LETTERING-HONOR WALL:MELLMAN 210-190-808-5804 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 MAY 2-17-214-0428 MEADOWS PKWY 190-180-999-5319 MAY 2-10-331-2153 TCC 190-184-999-5240 MAY 2-19-538-2262 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 APR 2-20-792-2444 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5319 ~L~y 2-20-798-3248 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 APR 2'19-683-3255 FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319 APR 2-19-685-3263 FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319 APR 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 APR 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 MAY 2~02-351-5281 CRC 190-186-999-5240 MAY 2-02-351-5281 CRC 190-182-999-5240 APR 2-02-502-807/ MAIHT FAC 340-199-702-5240 CREDIT:METER MISREAD 193-180-999-5240 MAY WED.CHPL PEST CONTROL SVCS 190-185-999-5250 MAY MUSEUM PEST CONTROL SVCS 190-185-999-5250 }L%Y SR CTR PEST CONTROL SVCS 190-181-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 53.87 1,640.00 191.32 637.74 75.66 274.99 200.41 284.86 242.95 25.06 7,896.72 3,000.00 672,46 718.33 7,2T/.68- 32.00 42.00 29.00 69155 05/10/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 596.25 69155 05/10/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 96.75 69155 05/10/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 6.75 69155 05/10/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.25 69155 05/10/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 45.00 69155 05/10/01 001547 TE/~MSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 33.75 69155 05/10/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 51.75 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 69156 69156 69156 69156 69156 69156 69156 69156 69156 69157 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280'1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 4,753.18 225.00 934. O0 1.25 9.75 3.7~ 75.00 466.66 11.25 SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 167.00 N/S RESTROOM DRINKING FOUNTAIN 190-180-999-5212 PUSH ROD FOR 8" WALL. 190-180-999-5212 SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 69158 69158 69158 69159 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT VAR PARKS LOCKSMITH SVCS 190-180-999-5212 207.03 15.52 16.69 52.40 CHECK AMOUNT 53.87 1,640.00 6,942.82 103.00 832.50 6,479.84 167.00 239.24 52.40 69160 05/10/01 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED NAR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-161-999-5263 20.84 69160 05/10/01 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-162-999-5263 262.34 69160 05/10/01 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-170-999-5262 5.93 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 05/10/01 11:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 69160 69160 69160 69160 69160 69161 69161 69162 69162 69163 69164 69164 69165 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 000919 TEMEEULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED TEMECULA VALLEY WOMAN'S TEMECULA VALLEY ~a~MAN'S 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 003366 TORAN DEVELOP. & CONSTR 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS TRACY, JENNIFER ITEM DESCRIPTION MAR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MAR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MAR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MAR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE MAR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5263 340-199-701-5263 001-163-999-5263 001-164-601-5263 001-165-999-5263 REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-0323 190-2900 REFUND:ROOM RENTAL 190-182-4990 MAY CTY HL/MUS ELEV.INSPECTION MAY CTY HL/MUS ELEV.INSPECTION INSTALL BRDWLKS/BARHELS:6TH ST OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR LAND DEV REFUND:GYMNASTICS-TUMBLING TOT 340-199-701-5250 190-185-999-5250 001-164-603-5250 001-164-604-5220 001-163-999-5220 190-183-4982 ITEM AMOUNT 399.44 142.69 163.94 301.52 86.80 100.00 20.00 135.00 135.00 995.00 113.22 63.01 64.00 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 001-2360 148.88 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 165-2360 3.01 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 190'2360 30.76 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 192-2360 .08 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 193-2360 2.93 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 194-2360 .59 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&O 280'2360 1.49 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 300'2360 .74 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 320-2360 6.00 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 330-2360 2.25 69166 05/10/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 340-2360 4.27 69167 69167 69167 69167 69167 69167 69167 69167 69167 69167 69168 69168 69168 69168 69168 69168 69168 69168 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 320-2160 330-2160 340-2160 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M ~ST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF CC~4P 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 OEF COMP 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 05/10/01 11,533.36 101.16 2,089.20 7.50 168.69 44.50 115.85 88.55 1,416.68 169.46 588.70 108.40 1,106.04 23.38 31.60 42.00 61.84 35.00 CHECK AMOUNT 1,383.50 120.00 270.00 995.00 176.23 64.00 201.00 15,734.95 1,996.96 VOUEHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12 05/10/01 11=15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 69169 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVlCE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVlCE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 u S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL 5ERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS 05/10/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-100-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 001-171-999-5230 001-111-999-5230 190-185-999-5230 ITEM AMOUNT 3.35 121.09 89.26 55.73 178.81 37.52 499.37 164.19 856.12 199.21 2.23 48.17 344.42 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 127.05 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 8.75 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 22.60 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 192-2120 .10 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 2.20 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .50 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120 2.50 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 5.00 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120 5.00 69170 05/10/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120 .60 69171 05/10/01 URBAN WATER INSTITUTE~ 69172 05/10/01 004504 VAIL RANCH SELF STORAGE 69172 05/10/01 004504 VAIL RANCH SELF STORAGE 05/10/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 05/10/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 05/10/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 05/10/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 05/10/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 05/10/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. 69173 69173 69173 69173 69173 69174 05/10/01 05/10/01 URBAN STORM WTR CF:AP:6/14-15 001-163-999-5258 APR AUDIO/VIDEO TAPE STORAGE MAY AUDIO/VIDEO TAPE STORAGE APR XXX-1289 PRATT APR XXX-2629 NAGGAR APR XXX-2670 911 AUTO DIALER APR XXX-2676 GENERAL USAGE APR XXX-3539 GEHERAL USAGE APR XXX-5509 GENERAL USAGE 001-120-999-52~ 001-120-999-5277 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 APR ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE LINE 320-199-999-5208 SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT CREWS 001-164-601-5218 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN 69175 300.00 30.00 57.00 72.07 43.17 28.43 32.54 37.40 130.43 342.02 257.01 CHECK AMOUNT 2,599.47 174.30 300.00 87.00 344.04 342.02 257.01 TOTAL CHECKS 232,697.51 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINi~_N~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~"~ May 22, 2001 City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2001 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director'~' Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant ~ RECOMMENDATION: as of March 31, 2001. That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report which provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of March 31, 2001. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2001 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of March31, 2001 Cash Activity for the Month of March Cash and Investments as of March 1,2001 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of March 31, 2001 $ 58,885,472 4,230,140 (5,047,SSS) $ 58,067,947 Cash and Investments portfolio: Type of Investment petty Cash General Checldng Sweep Account (Money Market Account) BeneF~ Demand Delx~its Local Agency Investment Fund Certificate of Deposit (Retention Escrow) Various (Retention Escrow) Checidng Account (Parking Citations) Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 (Money MarkM Account) Reserve Account- CFD 88-12 (investment Agreement) Detinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFD 88-12 (investment Agreement) Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1 (Money Market Account) Reserve Account- CFD 98-1 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Trust Account~TCSD COPs (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-TCSD COPs (Investment Agreement) Trust Accounts-RDA Bends (Money Market Account) Resewe Account-RDA Bonds (Investment Agresment) Institution Yield Maturity/ Contractual/ Termination Market Date Value Par/Book Balance City Hail n/a $ 1,500 $ 1,500 Union Bank n/a (505,997) (505,997) (1) Union Bank 4.130 % 1,163,000 1,163,000 (Highmark U.S. Treasury) Union Bank n/a 227 227 State Treasurer 5.976 % 51,594,099 51,594,099 (2) Community Bank 6.010 % 273,861 273,861 U.S. Bank Vadous 249,044 249,044 Union Bank n/a 8,074 8,074 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.980 % 249,899 249,899 CDCFundtngCorp 5.430 % 9/1/2017 1,531,469 1,531,469 CDC Funding Corp ' 5.422 % 9/1/2017 500,000 500,000 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.980 % 573 573 State Treasurer 5.976 % 929,000 929,000 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.980 % 120,485 120,485 Bayerlsche Landesbank 6.870 % 10/1/2012 502,690 502,690 U.S. Bank (Firet Am. Treasury) 4.980 % 1,103 1,103 Bayedsche Landesbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013 1,448,920 1,448,920 $ 58,067,947 (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. (2)-At Mamh 31, 2001 total market value (including acomed interest) for the Local A;lency Investment Fund (LAIF) was .~43,537.433,535. The City's pmportionate sham of that '~alue is $51,765,709. AJI investments am liquid and currently available. The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual e.~penditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months. ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Shawn Nelson, City Manager May 22, 2001 American Legion - Boys State Program CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA~CE~__~. CITY MANAGER PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council allocate $2,000 for two Temecula High School students for the American Legion-Boys State Program. BACKGROUND: At the request of Councilmember Jeff Stone at the City Council meeting of April 24, 2001, two outstanding academic students were selected to receive a $1,000 scholarship each, in honor of the American Legion-Boys State Program. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Council Discretionary line-item account number 001-100-999-5285. ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCEt~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Peter Thorson, City Attorney May 22, 2001 Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Initiation of Actions Necessary to Foreclose Delinquent Special Tax Liens RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopts a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88- 12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL. DISCUSSION: On October 7, 1997, the City of Temecula became the governing entity for Community Facilities District No. 88-12 ("CFD 88-12") which was originally established in 1988 by the County of Riverside for certain improvements on Ynez Road. Bonds were issued by CFD-12 in 1992 in order to fund the improvements. In June 1998 these bonds were refunded, and new bonds were issued in their place. These bonds are repaid through parceled special taxes. Such taxes are collected in bi-annual installments and are placed on the County's tax roll rather than being hand-billed. As a result of property owner's failure to pay the special taxes, the properties with the following parcel numbers within CFD No. 88-12 are currently delinquent: 921-730-004-2 921-730-005-3 921-730-006--4 921-730-007-5 921-730-008-6 921-730-009-7 921-730-010-7 921-730-011-8 921-730-012-9 921-730-013-0 921-730-014-1 921-730-015-2 921-730-018-5 The delinquent parcels are located in the area just south of the auto park. As of May 22, 2001, the delinquencies on these parcels exceeded $102,901.74. As the governing body of CFD 88-12, the City of Temecula is obligated to foreclose upon the delinquent parcels pursuant to its responsibilities under the bond indentures. In order for the City to proceed with its foreclosure action, it must first seek to "strip" the existing delinquencies from the County's tax rolls. In order to achieve this, the City Council must adopt a resolution which strips the delinquencies from the County's tax rolls. Subsequently, the City must file a Notice of Stripping, which effectively relieves the County Tax Collector from further responsibility in the collection and/or foreclosure upon the delinquent parcels. The goal of the actions is to obtain payment of the special taxes due along with interest, penalties and costs of collection. The property owner will be given every opportunity to pay the amounts due, but the City must formally proceed with the foreclosure actions. FISCAL IMPACT: The delinquencies on these parcels exceed $102,901.74 and will be used to satisfy the debt service requirement on the outstanding bonds. Attachments: Resolution No. 2001- Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2001-__ RESOLUTION NO. 2001-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88- 12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare as follows: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and A. The County of Riverside, California, did previously undertake proceedings to and did establish a community facilities district pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (hereinafter "Mello-Roos Act"), as codified, Government Code section 53311, et seq.; and B. The County of Riverside did previously issue special tax bonds pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Mello-Roos Act to finance public improvements; and C. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, the timely collection of the special tax installments are necessary for the timely payment of all principal and interest on the special tax bond and each special tax levy thereof and interest and penalties thereon constitute liens against the lots and parcels of land against which they are made, until the same are paid; and D. Certain special taxes have not been paid when due, and certain special taxes may not be paid in the future; and E. The County of Riverside has covenanted with the owners of the special tax bonds to commence and diligently pursue foreclosure actions against those parcels of land subject to the delinquent payment of special taxes; and F. The City of Temecula, as successor-in-interest to the County of Riverside, desires to assume the duty of the County of Riverside Tax Collector in collecting upon the existing delinquencies in Community Facilities District No. 88-12; and G. Under the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the California Government Code, the City Council is authorized, at any time prior to the expiration of four years subsequent to the last maturity of the principal of bonds secured by assessment or reassessment, to order the same to be collected by an action brought in the Superior Court to foreclose the liens of the delinquent special taxes; and H. Under the provisions of Section 53356.2 of the California Government Code, when such foreclosure actions are ordered, the county tax collector is to be credited upon the current tax roll with the amount charged against the tax collector on account of the delinquent special taxes to be sued on and to be relieved of further duty in regard ~hereto and a Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Special Tax Installments from the Tax Roll is to be recorded with the county recorder's office in the county in which the real property is located. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby orders that the delinquent payments of special taxes for CFD 88-12 with respect to those parcels identified on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and all subsequent delinquent special taxes with respect to those parcels which are not paid when due, be collected by action brought in the Superior Court of Riverside to foreclose the liens thereof. Section 3. The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to institute such actions in the name of the City to foreclose the liens of all such delinquent special taxes, Section 4. The City Clerk, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and cause to be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Special Tax Installments from the Tax Roll. Section 5. The City Clerk, in cooperation and in conduction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Auditor/ Controller's office of the County of Riverside together with such other documents and the payment of such fees as is necessary or appropriate to credit the County of Riverside Tax Collector upon the tax roll with the amounts charged against the Tax Collector on account of the delinquent special tax installments to be sued upon and to relieve the Tax Collector of further duty in regards thereto, Section 6. The City Manager, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to take such further actions as may be necessary or convenient to recover the special taxes due from the properties and to prosecute the foreclosure actions. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula on May 22, 2001. Jeff Comercheor, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of May, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A City of Temecula Community Facilities Districts CFD No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Assessor's Parcel No. Installment Delinquent Amount NORTH PLAZA 921-730-004-2 921-730-005-3 921-730-006-4 921-730-007-5 921-730-008-6 921-730-009-7 921-730-010-7 921-730-011-8 921-730-012-9 921-730-013-0 921-730-014-1 921-730-015-2 921-730-018-5 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 December 10, 2000 April 10, 2001 3,130.32 3,130.32 5,438.78 5,438.78 12,376.25 12,376.25 2,211.77 2,211.77 1,196.53 1,196.53 1,111.93 1,111.93 2,030.48 2,030.48 2,006.31 2,006.31 1,365.74 1,365.74 1,498.69 1,498.69 1,547.03 1,547.03 8,411.98 8,411.98 9,125.06 9,125.06 ITEM 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANO~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council q~William G. Hughes, Director Works/City Engineer of Public May 22, 2001 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-5 located North of Rancho California Road, East of Margarita Road, West of Meadows Parkway, South of La Serena Way and within the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199, Temeku Hills Subdivision. PREPARED BY: /]~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ET_~lement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULAACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETSlNTOTHE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM(WITHINTRACT MAP NO. 23371-5) BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 23371-5 was approved by the City Council on August 28, 1990. The owner chose to retain all interior streets, and so designated private streets on the final map. Therefore, right of way was not dedicated to the public on the final map. On December 10, 1996, the City Council accepted an offer of dedication of right of way for street purposes as well as a separate offer of dedication for sidewalk and utility purposes. On January 16, 1997, the County Recorder of the County of Riverside recorded the offers of dedication for street purposes and sidewalk and utility purposes as Instrument Nos. 015937 and 015932 respectively. Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. Therefore, the final one-year warranty bond was released. All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released. The public streets now being accepted by this action are Dog Leg Circle, Nassau Court, Spoon Cimle, and portions of Niblick Road. The first portion of Niblick Road being accepted is from Brassie Lane east to the end of the cul-de-sac. The other portion of Niblick Road being accepted is from Wedge Way northeast to the end of the cul-de-sac. FlSCALIMPACT: ~am. ATrACHMENT: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Loc~ion Map Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. 1 r:~agdrpt\.2001\O522\tr23371-5.acceptstreets RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-5) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, On December 10, 1996, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication of right of way for street purposes made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership as a separate document recorded on January 16, 1997 as Instrument No. 015937: and, WHEREAS, On December 10, 1996, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication for sidewalk and utility purposes made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership as a separate document recorded on January 16, 1997 as Instrument No. 015932: and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed: and, WHEREAS, All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released, including the final warranty bond: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City-Maintained-Street System that street and portion of street offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED', by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22n~ day of May, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 2 r:~agd rpt\.2001\0522\tr23371-5.acceptstreets STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular' meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of May, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~agdrpt\.2001\0522\tr23371-5.acceptstreets EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2001-.__ Accepting several of the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 23371-5 into the City-Maintained Street System as described below: Those portions of Tract Map No. 23371-5 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, as filed in Book 224, Pages 50-56 Inclusive, of Maps, in the Recorder's Office of said county, particularly described as follows: 1. Lot"A" (Portion of Niblick Road from Brassie Lane east to the end of the cul-de-sac) of said Tract Map No. 23371-5 2. Lot "B" (Dog Leg Circle) of said Tract Map No. 23371-5 3. Lot "C" (Nassau Court) of said Tract Map No. 23371-5 4. Lot "D" (Portion of Niblick Road from Wedge Way northeast to the end of the cul-de-sac) of said Tract Map No. 23371-5 5. Lot "E" (Spoon Circle) of said Tract Map No. 23371-5 TOGETHER WITH Portions of Tract Map No. 23371-5 as filed in Book 224 pages 50 through 56 inclusive of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California located in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: That portion of Lots 26, 27, 48 and 49 of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide, lying Easterly of and adjacent to the Easterly sideline of Lot "D" as shown on Tract 23371-4 as filed in Book 223 pages I through 9 inclusive of Maps, Records of said county; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolongated as to terminate radial to the Northeasterly comer of Lot "D" of said Tract 23371-4, said radial bears North 72026'55" West per said Tract 23371-4, and terminate radial to the Westerly terminus of the 24.00 foot radius curve concave Northerly on the Southerly Line of said Let 49 of said Tract 23371-5; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 69 through 74 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 6.00 foot wide strip of land, lying Southerly of and adjacent to the Southerly sideline of Lot "A" as shown on said Tract 23371-5; The Sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or elongated as to terminate on the Northerly line of said Lot 74 and the Northerly line of said lot 69. TOGETHER WITH 4 r:~agdrpt\.2001 ~0522\t r23371-5.acceptstreets That portion of Lot 74 of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 2.50 foot wide strip of land, lying Southeasterly of and adjacent to the Southeasterly sideline of Lot "G" as shown on said Tract 23371-4; The Sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or elongated as to terminate on the Southerly line of said Lot 74 and the Southerly line of Lot "A" of said Tract 23371-5. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 63 through 68 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 2.50 foot wide strip of land, lying Northerly of and adjacent to the Northerly sideline of Lot "A" as shown on said Tract 23371-5 and Lot "D" as shown on said Tract 23371-4; The Sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or elongated as to terminate on the Easterly sideline of Lot "B" of said Tract 23371-5, and the Southerly line of said lot 68. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 49 through 55 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5 more particularly described as follows: A 6.00 foot wide strip of land lying Northerly and Westerly of and adjacent to the Northerly and Westerly sideline of Lot "B" as shown on said Tract 23371-5; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate radial to the Easterly terminus of a 24.00 foot Radius curve concave Northerly on the South line of said Lot 49 and on the Northerly prolongation of the course along Lot "B" and Lot 55 shown as North 3 °21'48" East 3.50 feet on said Tract 23371- 5; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 35 through 48 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 6.00 foot wide strip of land lying Southeasterly, Easterly and Northerly of and adjacent to the Southeasterly, Easterly and Northerly sideline of Lot "C" of said Tract 23371-5; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolongated as to terminate on the Westerly line of said Lot 48 and at the Southwesterly line of said Lot 35. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 16 through 26 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 6.00 foot wide strip of land lying Southeasterly and Easterly of and adjacent to the Southeasterly and Easterly sideline of Lot "D" of said Tract 23371-5; 5 r:~gdrpt\.2001\0522\tr23371-5.acceptstreets The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolongated to terminate radial to the most Southerly comer of said Lot "D" and on the Northwesterly line of said Lot 16; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 4 through 8 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 6.00 foot wide strip of land lying Southwesterly, Westerly and Northwesterly of and adjacent to the Southwesterly, Westerly and Northwesterly sideline of Lot "E" of said Tract 23371-5; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northwesterly sideline of Lot "D" of said Tract 23371-5, and at the Easterly line of said Lot 8. TOGETHER WITH That portion of said Lot 49 of Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land lying adjacent to and 6.50 feet Northerly of, and all of said Lot 49 lying Southerly of, the following described line: BEGINNING at the Easterly terminus of a 24.00 foot radius curve concave Northerly on the Southerly line of said Lot 49; THENCE South 88°13'13" West 35.28 feet to the Westerly terminus of said curve and the POINT OF TERMINATION. The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Southerly and Westerly lines of said Lot 49; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 48 of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 7.00 foot wide strip of land lying Easterly of and adjacent to, and all of said Lot 48 lying Westerly of, the following described line: BEGINNING at the Southerly terminus of a 24.00 foot radius curve concave Easterly on the Westerly line, of said Lot 48; THENCE North 26°57'24'' East 38.71 feet to the Northeasterly terminus of said 24.00 foot radius curve, and the POINT OF TERMINATION. The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northerly and Westerly lines of said Lot 48; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 75 of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: 6 r:~gdrpt\.2001\O522\tr23371-5.acceptstreets A 6.00 foot wide strip of land lying Westerly and Northerly of and adjacent to Lot "D" of Tract 23371-1 as filed in Book 216 pages 8 through 16 inclusive of Maps, of said County and Lot "W" and Lot "C" of Tract 23371-3 as filed in Book 222 pages 99 through 113 inclusive of Maps, of said County; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Southwesterly line of Lot 25 of said Tract 23371-1, and the Southeasterly line of Lot 61 of said Tract 23371-3; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 75 of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 6.00 foot wide strip of land lying Southerly of and adjacent to Lot "E" of said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northwesterly line of Lot 75 of said Tract 23371-5 and the Westerly line of Lot 9 of said Tract 23371-1; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 75 of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 6.00 foot wide strip of land lying Northwesterly of and adjacent to Lot "H" of said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northerly line of Lot 8 of said Tract 23371-1 and the Westerly line of Lot 9 of said Tract 23371-1; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 1 through 4 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 2.50 foot wide strip of land, lying Northwesterly of and adjacent to the Northwesterly sideline of lettered Lot "D" as shown on said Tract 23371-5 and lying Northerly of and adjacent to the Northerly sidelines of Lot "C" and Lot "D" of Tract 23371-4 as filed in Book 223, pages 1 through 9 inclusive of Maps of said County; The Sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or elongated as to terminate on the Northwesterly line of said Lot 1 and the Southwesterly sideline of Lot "E" of said Tract 23371-5.. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 9 through 15 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: 7 r:~agdrpt~.2001\0522\tr23371-5,acceptstreets A 2.50 foot wide strip of land, lying Northeasterly and Northwesterly of and adjacent to the Northeasterly and Northwesterly sidelines of Lot "E" and Lot "D" of said Tract 23371-5; The Sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or elongated as to terminate on the Westerly line of said Lot 9 and the Southeasterly line of said lot 15; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 27 through 34 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 2.50 foot wide strip of land, lying Northwesterly of and adjacent to the Northwesterly sideline of Lot "C" as shown on said Tract 23371-5; The Sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or elongated as to terminate on the Westerly line of said Lot 27 and the Northeasterly line of said Lot 34; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 55 through 63 inclusive of said Tract 23371-5, more particularly described as follows: A 2.50 foot wide strip of land, lying Easterly and Southerly of and adjacent to the Easterly and Southerly sideline of Lot "B" as shown on said Tract 23371-5; The Sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or elongated as to terminate on the Northeasterly sideline of Lot "D" as shown on said Tract 23371-4 and on the Northerly prolongation of the course on the Southerly line of said Lot 55 shown as North 3°21 '48" East 3.50 feet on said Tract 23371-5; EASEMENT ADDITION: Augmented by an easement 5.00 feet on both sides of and extending 5.00 feet beyond all street lighting appurtenances including, but not limited to, pull boxes, poles and guy wires. Subject to all covenants, conditions, rights, reservations, rights of way and easements if any of record. 8 r:~agdrpt\.2001\0522\t r23371-5.acceptstreets ITEM 8 aPPROVAl J'~/,~¢'~l CItY ATTORNEY ~ ii DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~(~__~__ II CitY MANAGER -~1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council .,~illiam Director of Public Works/City Engineer G. Hughes, May 22, 2001 Parcel Map No. 29821, Located at 43172 Business Park Drive PREPARED BY: f-~/Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (~iClement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 29821 conformance with the Conditions of Approval in BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 29821 is a subdivision of Pamel 1 of Parcel Map No. 20873 whereby 5.25 acres will be subdivided into a one-pamel condominium map. Parcel Map No. 29821 consists of 5 units totaling 67,494 square feet located at 43172 Business Park Drive. The parcel map shows restricted access along Business Park Drive, excepting two 35-foot wide access openings. There is a 20-foot wide Rancho California Water District Easement, an 8-foot wide Southern California Edison Easement, and a 20-foot wide Landscape Easement that are within the map boundary. Both agencies have provided the City with non-interference letters which state that they do not object to the recordation of the parcel map. One monument associated with this parcel map has already been set, all improvements on Business Park Drive are complete, and all onsite improvements are complete including buildings. Therefore no bonds were collected. The Developer, Windsor Partners, has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This parcel map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Parcel Map No. 29821 1 r:~agd rpt~2001~522~prn29821 .map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. PM 29821 There are no fees associated with this parcel map. All offsite and onsite improvements, including buildings, are already constructed. CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 29821 DATE: May 22, 2001 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT SECURITY SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0 Water $ 0 $ 0 Sewer $ 0 $ 0 TOTAL $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 *One monument associated with this improvements are complete. Therefore no bonds were collected. DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due parcel map has already been set and all offsite and onsite $ N/A $ N/A $ N/A $ 55.00 $ 8.oo $ 770.00 $. 250.00 $ 1,079.00 $ 0.00 2 r:'~gd rpt~001\0522~prn29821 .map o >- ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council APPROVAL CITY AI-i'ORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.,../~4~ CITY MANAGER ~/Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Acceptance of an Easement Deed for a Meandering Sidewalk along Rancho Way with a portion within Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 19580 located at the southeast corner of Rancho Way and Business Park Drive PREPARED BY: ¢~/Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ~) Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED FOR A MEANDERING SIDEWALK ALONG RANCHO WAY WITH A PORTION WITHIN PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19580 AS REQUIRED PER THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0367 BACKGROUND: On January 3, 2001 the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA00-0367, the design, construction and operation of four multi-tenant speculative buildings and the associated Conditions of Approval. Per Condition 38 of the Conditions of Approval, easements for sidewalks that meander through private property shall be dedicated to the City and approved by the Department of Public Works, the City Attorney, and the City Council. The easement deed is to secure public access, construction and maintenance through private property. The alignment and location of the portion of the meandering sidewalk easement shown on Exhibit "B", made part of the said Easement Deed, is in general conformance with the development plan. FISCAL IMPACT: N~ne All'ACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Easement Deed - Meandering Sidewalk with Exhibit "A" and "B" made a part thereof. R:~agdrpt\01\0522~m28627parce14.m eanderingsidewalkeasementdedication 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED FOR A MEANDERING SIDEWALK ALONG RANCHO WAY WITH A PORTION WITHIN PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19580 AS REQUIRED PER THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0367 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: City Staff has established the requirement for dedication of an easement for sidewalks that meander through private property per Condition of Approval No. 38 of the Conditions of Approval, PA00-0367, approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on January 3, 2001; The developer, MKJ Temecula Business Park, LLC submitted and easement deed for a meandering sidewalk including the construction and maintenance of the sidewalk; C. Acceptance the easement deed serves both the public and private interests of the community. WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby desires to accept the easement deed by MKJ Temecula Business Park, LLC for meandering sidewalk as shown in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts the easement deed by MKJ Temecula Business Park, LLC for a meandering sidewalk. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of May, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor A'I-rEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:~gdrpt~01\0522~m28627parce14.meanderingsidewalkeasem entdedication 2 (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regula;' meeting thereof held on the 22"d day of May, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:~agdrpt\01\0522~m28627parce14.meanderingsidewalkeasementdedication 3 EASEMENT DEED- MEANDERING SIDEWALK FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby aclmowledged, MKJ Temecula Business Park, LLC GRANT(S) to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for meandering sidewalk, including the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California, described as: See A~ached Exhibit "A" F°r C°mplete Deserif~///~ .t.///~//By~/~ IN WITNESS THEREOF, these Eresents have executed this instrument this o~3//4/ day of x'7/fg/o/~ .200 / Print Name and Title MKJ Temecula Business Park, LLC STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. By: ~anager COUNTYOFi~aE~~ J Developers, LLC On ~ ~.~ / . before me the undarsigned, By: Michael B. Mueller a Notary Public in a~d for the State of California, personally appeared Managing Member personally known to me (g: prca~da~ ,~ ~a4~-basis-o f~evtdence) to be the person~ whose name) is/ave'subscribed to the wi~kin instrument and a~knowledged to me that hel~c~,"',h;'.; executed the same in hi .s/hg..?-h::~ authorized capacity(/es), and that by his/L'-: -'.t'-hc:-- signatur e~ on the ilts~mment the person(~, or the entity upon behalf of which the peifson~ acted, ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE ATTEST: By: JeffComerchero, Mayor BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT Legal Description A parcel of land being a portion of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 19580, recorded January 27, 1989 in book 154 of Parcel Maps, at pages 92 thru 96, in the city of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly comer of said Parcel 4: Thence, along the southeasterly Right-of-Way line of Rancho Way as shown on said Parcel Map 19580, South 47000'23" West a distance of 70.05 feet, to the beginning of a tangent 789.00 foot curve concave northwesterly; Thence, continuing Southwesterly along said Right-of-Way line and along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 12013'50" an arc distance of 168.10 feet to a point on said 789.00 foot radius curve, whence a radial line bears South 30045'47" East, said point also being the beginning of a non-tangent 112.00 foot radius curve concave northwesterly, whence a radial line beam South 55°18'28" East, said point also being True point of beginning; Thence, leaving said Right-of-Way line and Southwesterly along the arc of said 112.00 foot radius curve through a central angle of 56°50'11" an arc distance of 111.10 feet to a point on said 789.00 foot radius curve, whence a radial line bears South 23000'57" East; Thence, Northeasterly along said Right-of-Way line and along the arc of said 789.00 foot radius curve through a central angle of 07044'50'' an arc distance of 106.68 feet to the True point of beginning. EXHIBIT 'B' 7"W PARCEL D--07'44'50" =106.68' so1'31'43"w(_~ S55'lS'28"E(_~ I .8/ R~112.00' L~lll.IO' ~'50' L=168,10' T.P.O.B. EASEMENT FOR MEANDERING SIDEWALK EXIST. 20' DRAINAGE--%-.~i EASEMENT PER P,M, '~ 19580 PARCEL 4 P,M, 19580 SCALE: 1"--100' EXIST. SEWER EASEMENT-x....L~ I REC, 4-26-197~, AS ~% ~ INST NO 53~82 PARCEL 3 ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN~E~L,~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council /~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Quitclaim Vehicular Access Easement, located within Tract Map No. 23125-1, through Residential Lot 29 and Open Space Lot 43, from Calle Morita to Butterfield Stage Road PREPARED BY: /'~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (:~Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE QUITCLAIM OF A VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE UNDERLYING FEE OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23125-1, THROUGH RESIDENTIAL LOT 29 AND OPEN SPACE LOT 43, FROM CALLE MORITA TO BUTFERFIELD STAGE ROAD BACKGROUND: On November 9, 1994, the City of Temecula Planning Director approved a Revised Map for Vesting Tract Map No. 23125 and related Conditions of Approval, Planning Application No. PA94-0090. Per Condition of Approval No. 7, of those conditions of approval, a temporary secondary access road to Butterfield Stage Road, across Lot29 of Tract Map No. 23125- 1, was to be constructed prior to the issuance of the 35th certificate of occupancy. The developer satisfied this condition by constructing a 32-foot wide secondary access road over an emergency vehicle access easement dedicated to the City on Final Tract Map No. 23125-1, filed in Book 246, Pages 81-85 of Riverside County. All street improvements within the subdivision are now completed and all lots within the first phase of the subdivision are occupied with the exception of Lot 29. Therefore, the secondary access is no longer needed and should be quitclaimed. The emergency vehicle access easement runs across Lot 29, a residential lot, and Lot 43, an open space lot. The owner of Lot 29 is KB Home Coastal, Inc. The owner of Lot 43 is California Tradewinds Homeowners Association, a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation. Two Quitclaim Deeds, each with Exhibits "A" and "B", one for Lot 29 and the other for Lot 43, are included with this Staff Report. 1 r:~agdrpt~.2001 \0522\tm23125-1 LOT29&43.quitclaimvehicularaccesseasement FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2001- Quitclaim Deed to KB Home Coastal, Inc. for Lot 29 of TM 23125-1 with Exhibit "A" and "B" Quitclaim Deed to California Tradewinds Homeowners Association, a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation for Lot 43 of TM 23125-1 with Exhibit "A" and "B" 2 r:~agdrpt~.2001 ~0522\tm23125-1 LOT29&43.quitclairnvehicularaccesseasernent RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE QUITCLAIM OF A VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE UNDERLYING FEE OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23125-1, THROUGH RESIDENTIAL LOT 29 AND OPEN SPACE LOT 43, FROM CALLE MORITA TO BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City of Temecula Planning Director approved a Revised Map for Vesting Tract Map No. 23125 and related Conditions of Approval, in particular Condition of Approval No. 7, which required the construction of a temporary secondary access road and the procurement of an access easement; and, WHEREAS, the developer offered for dedication a 32-foot wide emergency vehicular access easement on Final Tract Map No. 23125-1 across residential Lot 29 and open space Lot 43; and, WHEREAS, all street improvements within the subdivision are now completed and all lots within the first phase of the subdivision are occupied with the exception of Lot 29, and therefore this secondary access road is no longer needed; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves a quitclaim which quitclaims the emergency vehicle access easement across residential Lot 29 and open space Lot 43 to the underlying fee owners, KB Home Coastal, Inc. and California Tradewinds Homeowners Association, a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation, respectively and authorizes the Mayor to execute the quitclaim deed in substantially the form attached. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd dayof May 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:\agdrpt\.2001\0522\tm23125-1LOT29&43.quitclaimvehicu]araccesseasement STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd dayof May, 2001, bythe following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 4 r:\agdq)t\.2001\0522\tm23125-1 LOT29&43.q uitclaimvehicularaccesseasement WH~=N RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk's Department City of Temecula P.O, Box 9033 43200 Business Par~ Ddve Temecula, CA 92589-9033 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ -~- Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed; OR Computed on the consideration or value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. Signature of Declarant or Agent determining tax B Firm Name QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, THE CITY OF TEMECULA does hereby rem/se, release and forever quitclaim to: KB Home Coastal. Inc. the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, descdbed as: See attached Exhibits A and B, legal description and map. Dated: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ) On personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of safisfacto~j evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged fo me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and officia~ seal. Signature Dated: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) o~r',c"if'c,'-'~)rD ) ss. COUNTY ) On ~-,~)-¢ L~ beforem~,~)~tl}~,J~"~_, ~tr~C'~] ~C,r~ ~ht((' , pemonallyappeamd ~ ~ c ~ [~zd' V~ pemonally known fo me (or pro~d-ta me'on the'basis of satisfacto~ evidence)-to be the person~) whose name~s) islam-subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged fo me that he/sh~-'~'m~ executed the same In his/~cr.a_h:!r authorized capacity~, and that by his/berber signaturre(~' on the instrument, the person~i'~, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNES,~my hand and o/~flcial/se~.. - / Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones. CMC/~, City Clerk Approved as to Form Peter M. Thorson, CityAttorney (This area for official notadal seal,) Quitclaim Deed acknowledgment, authorization to record: (Signat'u~r~of a~ative) Title Date: ~. ~..~r~ I acceptance and EXHIBIT A THAT PORTION OF LOT 29 OF TRACT 23125-1, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY IN BOOK OF MAPS NO. 246, PAGES 81-85, O.R. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 29, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE THEREOF S 27°38'50" E 14.46 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF A 32.00 FOOT WIDE EMERGENCY VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF SAID TRACT NO. 23125-1, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ALSO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 116.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS N 20°22~27"W; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID EMERGENCY VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT 94.77 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46°48'28"; THENCE S 63033' 59" E 124.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 29, BEING A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS N 50°21'12'' W;'THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 32.29 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26025'34'' TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID 32.00 FOOT WIDE EMERGENCY VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT, BEING 32.00 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE THEREOF, PARALLEL TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, N 63°33'59"W 124.24 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF .84.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 64.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44000'45" TO SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 29; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE N 27038'50'' W 32.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. E×I-hI~T ~ WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk's Department City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ ~0- Computed on the consideration or value of properly conveyed; OR Computed on the consideration or value less IJens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. Signature of Declarant or Agent determining tax- Firm Name QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, THE CITY OF TEMECULA does hereby remise, release and forever quitclaim to: California Tradewinds Homeowners Association, a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as: See attached Exhibits "A" and "B," legal description and map. This quitclaim shall release only the City's interest in the described land. It shall not affect any City obligations, including but not limited to any maintenance obligations, pertaining to the described land or any other pamel. Dated: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ) On before me, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/ara subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMG/..~I~, City Clerk Approved as to Form Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney EXHIBIT A THAT PORTION OF LOT 43 OF TRACT 23125-1, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY IN BOOK OF MAPS NO. 246, PAGES 81-85, O.R. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 43, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE THEREOF S 22057'33" E 14.71 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE 32.00 FOOT WIDE EMERGENCY VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF SAID TRACT NO. 23125-1, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID EMERGENCY VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT N 67002'27" E 13.84 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 116.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 5.23 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2035'06'' TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 43; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE S 27057'33'' E 32.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID EMERGENCY VEHICULAR ACCESS EASEMENT, BEING A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 84.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS N 17034'44'' W; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 7.89 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°44'49"; THENCE S 67002' 27" W 13.84 FEET TO SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 43; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE N 22°57'33"W 32.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ITEM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~-////~,..-~ CITY ATTORNEY ,/~ ~/'/f~,,, II DIRECTOROFFINANOE,..~:~ II CITY MANAGER ~/ II CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council ~"t~Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-2 located North of Rancho California Road, East of Margarita Road, West of Meadows Parkway, South of La Serena Way and within the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199, Temeku Hills Subdivision. PREPARED BY: lfRonald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (~lement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-2) BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 23371-2 was approved by the City Council on May 29, 1990. The owner chose to retain all interior streets, and so designated private streets on the final map. Therefore, right of way was not dedicated to the public on the final map. On December 10, 1996 the City Council accepted an offer of dedication of right of way for street purposes as well as a separate offer of dedication for sidewalk and utility purposes. On January 16, 1997, the County Recorder of the County of Riverside recorded the offers of dedication for street purposes and sidewalk and utility purposes as Instrument Nos. 015934 and 015929 respectively. Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. Therefore, the final one-year warranty bond was released. All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released. The public streets now being accepted by this action are Colonial Court, Cascades Court, Pinway, and Parway. A portion of Rancho California Road falls within the tract boundary but is a part of the City Maintained Street System as successors in interest to the County of Riverside. FISCALIMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. A'I'I'ACHMENT: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Location Map with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. 1 r:~agdrpt\.2001\O522\tr23371-2.acceptstreets RESOLUTION NO. 2001-.__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, On December 10, 1996, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication of right of way for street purposes made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership as a separate document recorded on January 16, 1997 as Instrument No. 015934: and, WHEREAS, On December 10, 1996, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication for sidewalk and utility purposes made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership as a separate document recorded on January 16, 1997 as Instrument No. 015929: and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed: and, WHEREAS, All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released, including the final warranty bond: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City-Maintained-Street System that street and portion of street offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of May, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor A'I-I'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 2 r:~agdrpt~.2001~522\tr23371-2.acceptstreets STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of May, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~agd rpt\.2001\0522\tr23371-2.acceptstreets EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2001-.__ Accepting several of the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 23371-2 into the City-Maintained Street System as described below: Those portions of Tract Map No. 23371-2 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, as filed in Book 219, Pages 18-25 Inclusive, of Maps, in the Recorder's Office of said county, particularly described as follows: 1. Lot "B" (Parway) of said Tract Map No. 23371-2 2. Lot "C" (Cascades Court) of said Tract Map No. 23371-2 3. Lot "D" (Pinway) of said Tract Map No. 23371-2 4. Lot "E" (Colonial Court) of said Tract Map No. 23371-2 TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 39 and Lot 40 of said Tract 23371-2 more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide, lying Northwesterly of and adjacent to the Northwesterly sideline of Lot "E" as shown on said Tract 23371-2; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolongated as to terminate on the Easterly line of said Lot 40, and on the Southerly line of said Lot 39; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 39 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide, lying Westerly and Southwesterly of and adjacent to the Easterly and Northeasterly lines of said Lot 39 as shown on said Tract 23371- 2; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolongated as to terminate on the Southeasterly line of Lot "D" of Tract 23371-1, as filed in Book 216 Pages 8 through 16 inclusive of Maps, records of Riverside County, California, and the Westerly line of Lot "E" per said Tract 23371-2; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 37 and Lots 16 through 21, inclusive of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide lying Westerly of and adjacent to the Westerly sideline of Lot "C" as shown on said Tract 23371-2; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northerly prolongation of that course on the Southerly line of Lot 21 of said Tract 4 r:~agd rpt\.2001~522\t r23371-2.acceptstreets 23371-2 shown as North 4°15'00"West 3.50 feet, and the Southeasterly line of Lot 37 of said Tract; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 16 and a portion of Lot 38 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide lying Northerly of and adjacent to the Northerly sideline of Lot "B" as shown on said Tract 23371-2; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate perpendicular to the Westerly terminus of the 24.00 foot radius curve concave Northerly on the Southerly line of said Lot 16, and the Westerly line of said Lot 38; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 16 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land lying adjacent to and 8.00 feet Northwesterly of and all of said Lot 16 lying Southeasterly of the following described line; BEGINNING at the Westerly terminus of the 24.00-foot radius curve concave Northerly on the Southerly line of said Lot 16; THENCE North 57 ° 11'39" East a distance of 32.39 feet to the Northerly terminus of said curve and the POINT OF TERMINATION. The sidelines of said strip are to be are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Easterly and Southerly line of said Lot 16; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 37 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 2.50 feet wide lying Southerly of and adjacent to the Southerly sideline of Lot "B" as shown on said Tract 23371-2; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Westerly line of Lot "C" as shown on said Tract 23371-2, and the Easterly line of Lot "D" of Tract 23371-1 as recorded in Book 216 Pages 8 through 16 of Maps said County records; TOGETHER WITH ' That portion of Lots 21 through 36 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 2.50 feet wide lying Northerly, Easterly and Southerly of and adjacent to the Northerly, Easterly and Southerly sideline of Lot "C" as shown on said Tract 23371-2; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northerly prolongation of that course on the Southerly line of Lot 21 of said Tract 5 r:~agdrpt\.2001\o522\tr23371-2,acceptstreets 23371-2 shown as North 4° 15'00"West 3.50 feet, and the Westerly line of Lot 36 of said Tract 23371-2; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 40 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 2.50 feet wide lying Northerly of and adjacent to the Northerly sideline of Lot "D" as shown on said Tract 23371-2; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Westerly line of Lot "E" as shown on said Tract 23371-2, and the Easterly line of Lot "D" of said Tract 23371-1; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 1 through 15 inclusive and a portion of Lot 38 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 2.50 feet wide lying Northerly, Easterly and Southerly of and adjacent to the Northerly, Easterly and Southerly sideline of Lot "E" as shown on said Tract 23371-2; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Westerly line of Lot 1 of said Tract 23371-2, and the Northerly line of Lot 38 of said Tract 23371-2; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 37 through 40 inclusive and Lot 42 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 2.50 feet wide lying Easterly of and adjacent to the Easterly sideline of Lot "D" as shown on said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Southerly line of Lot "F" of said Tract 23371-1, and the Northeasterly line of Lot "C" of said Tract 23371-1; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 41 and Lot 42 of said Tract 23371-2, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 2.50 feet wide lying Easterly of and adjacent to the Easterly sideline of Lot "C" as shown on said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Easterly line of Lot "D" of said Tract 23371-1, and the Northwesterly line of Lot "A" of said Tract 23371-2; EASEMENT ADDITION: 6 r:~agd rpt\.2001 ~0522\tr23371-2.acceplstreets Augmented by an easement 5.00 feet wide on both sides of and extending 5.00 feet beyond all street lighting appurtenances including, but not limited to, pull boxes, poles, and guy wires. Subject to all covenants, conditions, rights, reservations, rights of way and easements if any of record. NOTE: Lot "A", portion of Rancho California Road, falls within the tract boundary but is a part of the City Maintained Street System as successors in interest to the County of Riverside. 7 r:~.gd rpt\.2001\0522\t r23371-2.acceptstreets ITEM 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOROF FINANCE'~ C 'MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~'~)~.William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Amendment to Professional Services Agreement Inspection Services - Various Projects PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer -Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Amendment Number 2 to the Professional Survey Services Agreement with Vali Cooper and Associates, Inc. for an amount equal to $24,640 and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment. BACKGROUND: On October 30, 2000 the City Manager approved a professional services agreement with Vali Cooper and Associates, Inc. to provide an interim Public Works Inspector to cover a vacancy that arose because of an inspector resignation. The recruitment process took longer than anticipated so on December 19, 2000, at staff's request, Council approved amendment number one (1) to Vali Cooper's agreement increasing their contract total. A recent resignation has forced the Public Works Department to begin recruiting for another Public Works Inspector. The recruitment process for the inspector is anticipated to take one (1) to two (2) months. In order to bridge this recruitment period, a second amendment to Vail Cooper's agreement has been prepared. Vail Cooper will provide the same individual that filled in during the previous vacancy, eliminating the need to train a new inspector. The requested $24,640 amendment combined with 943,120 of the original amended contract amount exceeds the City Manager's 925,000 approving authority and therefore requires Council approval, FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for this agreement in the Public Works Temporary Help Account, No. 001-165-999-5118. ATTACHMENT: Amendment No. 2 1 R:\agdrpt \2001\0522\ValiCooperArnend2 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATES, INC. THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 22, 2001 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation Vail Cooper & Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: On October 27, 2000 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services" ("Agreement"). On December 19, 2000 the City issued Amendment #1 to the original agreement. C. ' The Agreement as amended shall be referred to as the "Agreement." The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1, "TERM" of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: This Agreement shall commence on October 30, 2000, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31 ,'2001, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the pro,,isions of this Agreement. 3. Section 4, "PAYMENT", paragraph a, of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit "A2", Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit "As" other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Sixty seven thousand seven hundred sixty Dollars and no Cents ($67,760) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. 4. Exhibit Al, to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a new Exhibit A2. is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment"A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set brth in full. 5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. R:~GMTEtV,~UCOOPER A2.DOC ]. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc. 41 Washington Ave. Pt. Richmpnd, CA 94801 BY: ~Yt~ [ ~ Va'Ii Cooper, Presi eU,,,~/CEO BY: NAME: TITLE: ~i:2,P~'/ ~.,~'o (Two Signatures Required For CorporatiOns) Consultant Services Agreement - Amendment 2 Construction Inspection Services - Various Projects Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc. Attachment A EXHIBIT A2 PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Scope of Services: Provide construction inspection for various ClP Projects Payment Rates: Classification Hourly Rate Inspector $72.00 Vehicle $5.00 Total Estimated Cost: ClasSification I Total Hours I Houd~/Rate Total Original Contract $ 23,040.00 $5.00 $ 1,600.00 Original Total $ 24,640.00 $72.00 $ 17,280.00 $5.00 $ 1,200.00 Inspector 320 I $72.00 Truck 320 I Amendment No. t Inspector I 240 Truck 240 Amendment No. 2 Inspector 320 Truck 320 Amendment 1 Total $ 18,480.00 $72.00 $ 23,040.00 $5.00 Amendment 2 Total $ 1,600.00 $ 24,640.00 Revised Contract Total $ 67,760.00 ITEM 13 APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council ."J4(C/CNilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 SUBJECT: Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program Project Number PW01-03 PREPARED BY,~L,~Amer Attar, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract Change Order No. I for an amount of $55,984.94 for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program, Project Number PW01-03. Approve a budget transfer of $36,000.00 from Capital Project Reserves, Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening at I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program. BACKGROUND: On April 10,2001, the City Council awarded the contract for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program, Project No. PW01-03, to Republic Electric in the amount of $368,714.25. The City of Temecula received a grant from the California Energy Commission (CEC) in the amount of $140,870. The purpose of the grant is to replace incandescent traffic signal lights with Light Emitting Diode (LED) at each traffic signal and intersection within the City of Temecula. The California Energy Commission has implemented this retroit rebate program to all state, local and regional agencies to encourage the replacement of incandescent lights with those using LED in an effort to reduce peak electricity demands throughout the State of California. Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $55,984.94, will increase the number of Amber Light Emitting Diode (LED) units, balls and arrows and pedestrian indications. In addition, six mast arm mount signal heads will be replaced to make them compatible with the new LED units. These additions to the contract will help save additional energy costs, estimated to be $15,000, and enhance our future option to use alternative power sources at critical intersections during power outages. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded by State of California Energy Commission grant and Capital Project Reserves. Adequate funds from Capital Project Reserves are available for the requested $36,000.00 transfer to cover Contract Change Order No. 1, to cover the increased number of equipment to be provided. The contract amount of $368,714.25 plus the 10% contingency of $36,871.43, and Contract Change Order No. 1 for a total contract cost of $461,570.62. A portion of the original 10% contingency is being retained to cover any unforeseen changes during the execution of this contract. ATTACHMENTS: Contract Change Order No. 1 I R;~GDRPT~2001\0522\PW01-03CCO 1 ,DOC CITY OF TEMECULA CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 01 PROJECT NO. PW 01-03 PAGE 1 of 2 PROJECT: TO CONTRACTOR: NOTE: CHANGE ORDER REQUESTED BY: Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program Republic Electric This change order does not go into effect until approved by the City Council City of Temecula DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Increase the number of Amber Light Emitting Diode (LED) units, balls and arrows; add "hand/man" pedestrian combo LED units, deduct "Ped" only LED units, and add 12" signal heads, MAS mount. These additions to the contract will enable signals in critical intersections to be fully operational during rolling blackouts, if the City adds the power backups. METHOD OF PAYMENT: Extrawork at contract unit price, agreed unit price, and extended amounts as shown: Item Extended No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 12" Amber Ball LED Unit, Furnished and 7 Installed 66 EACH $114.28 $7,542.48 DEDUCT From Contract This Number of 8 Units. Raised Pedestrian Hand LED Unit- -42 EACH $143.95 -$6,045.90 Type A, Furnished and Installed 12" Amber Arrow LED Unit, Furnished and New Installed 49 EACH $113.00 $5,537.00 Pedestrian Hand/Man Combo LED Unit, New Furnished and Installed 42 EACH $284.00 $11,928.00 13 12" Amber Ball LED Unit, Furnished Only 151 EACH $89.01 $13,440.51 DEDUCT From Contract This Number of 14 Units. Raised Pedestrian Hand LED Unit- -58 EACH $118.68 -$6,883.44 Type A, Furnished Only New 12" Amber Arrow LED Unit, Furnished Only 89 EACH $87.73 $7,807.97 Pedestrian Hand/Man Combo LED Unit, New Furnished Only 58 EACH $258.73 $15,006.34 12" Signal Head, MAS mount, with Back Plate & Full Circle Visor with 12" Red, New Amber, and Green Arrows, Furnished and 6 EACH $1,275.33 $7,651.98 /nsta//ed TOTAL $55,984.941 The agreed unit prices and extended amounts constitute full compensation, including all mark-ups for the work described above and no additional compensation will be allowed therefore. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 01 CONTRACT NO. PW 01-03 PAGE 2 of 2 CCO 01- Total Increase ..................................................... $55,984.94 Original Contract Amount. .......................................................................................... $368,714.25 This Change Order .................................................................................................... $. 55,984.94 Previously Approved Changes .................................................................................. .$ 0.00 Total Adjusted Contract Amount ................................................................................ ,$.424,699.19 Adjustment of Working Days ....................................................................................................... Q. Submitted by: Date: city of Temecula - Amer Attar, P.E. Senior Engineer Approved: Date: (AsdirectedbyCityManager) City of Temecula - William G. Hughes, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer We the undersigned contractor has given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, e~.ept as mayotherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above. Accepted, Date: By: Name: Signature Printed Contractor: Republic Electric Company name Title: If the contractor does n ct sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest ~ithin the time therein speciled, R:\CIP/PROJ ECTS\PWOI\PWO1-031ChangeOrder i .dec ITEM 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE_L~:~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~f~,/~ William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Completion and Acceptance Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program for FY00-01 Project No. PW00-17 PREPARED BY: Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Accept the project "Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program for FY00-01, Project No. PW00-17", as complete; and File a Notice of Completion, release the performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On August 8, 2000, the City Council awarded the contract to J.D.C., Inc. for an amount of $67,068.80. The project included a contingency amount of $6,706.88. This work included concrete sidewalk repairs, removal and replacement of curb and gutter, removal and replacement of concrete cross gutters, removal and replacement of catch basin lids, and repair of under sidewalk drains. This list was grouped together to form a cost effective project. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. FISCAL IMPACT: This Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program is funded through Public Works Department Routine Street Maintenance. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 001- 164-601-5402. The original contract amount for this project was $67,068.80. Contract Change Order No. 1 was approved in the amount of $3,810.40 for a total contract amount of $70,879.20. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit I R:~AGD RPT~2001\0522\PW00.17.ACC.DOC/ RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O, Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to J.D.C., Inc.to perform the following work of improvement: CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM FOR FY00-01 Project No. PW00-17 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on May 22, 2001. That upon said contract the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW 00- 17. The project location is: Various locations within the City of Temecula Dated at Temecula, California, this 22"d day of May 2001. Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council, Dated at Temecula, California, this 22"d day of May 2001. Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk CITY.OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND PROJECT NO. PIIViN~I? CITYllVIDE PoC. C. REPAIR PROGRAM FYO0-01 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE· PRESENT THAT: JDC, INc., 13061 SHASTA CT., RANCHQ CUCAMONGA~ CA 91729 NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S BOND (/08084600 PREMIUM: INCLUDED IN . PERF~kNCE . BOND PREMIUM CORPORATION , hereinafter called Principal.and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANy.' OF MARYLAND, 225 S. LAKE AVE.,. sTE, 700. PAsaDENA. NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY · CA 91101 hereinafter celled SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of SEVEN ~0USAND EIGNTY-SEVEN ' .' DOLLAR8 ~nd , ~INETY-TWO " cENTs · ($ . 7,087.92... ~ ) in lawful mone~, of the United States, said sum being not i~'~S' than' ten (10%) of the Contact value payable by the said City of Temecule under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, . jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS. OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the ... 8TH day of AUGUST , 2000, a copy of which is.hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT' NO. PW0O. 17, C~IDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM FY00-0¶. WHEREAS, said Contact provides that the Principal will fumish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one (1) year. after approval of the final estimate on. said job, by the OWNER, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent dLJring said period; WHEREAS. the said contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on · ' 2000 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION 15 SUCH, that if within one .year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract,' the work d~ne under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution Of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials .were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otheMise this instrument shalJ be void. As s part.of'the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be Included. including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City of Temecule in sUCCesSfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. iUdNTEN&NC[ BOND ~-1 I%I~g~QJECTgJ~O(N1~BID DZ:X: · . The Surety hereby s~lpulates 'and .agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration .or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to.the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying.the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it. does hereby. waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to:the terms of the Contract, or to the work. or to.the Specifications. ' ' Signed and sealed this l~T~ day of MARC~ ,200g. .. i~EPOS:IT" APPROVED A~ T° FORM: Peter M. ,'City AtlomeY PRINCIPAL JDC, INC.. o'rde) ! By: . (Name) CnUe) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California ' '~' County of. oz-a~ge ' · '! On MARCH 14~ 2001 personally appeared ,be~mme, BRAD L. SETTGAST, NOTARY PUBLI~ J.W. Johnson [] personally known to me !-I proved to me on the basis of satisfactory · evidence to be the person~) whose name(~ is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/~ executed the same in hisif:~JfJiA~ authorized capacity~, and that by signature(D on the instrument the person[4~[, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(A) acted executed the instrument. nd official seal. OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Boric!. Document Date: HARCH 14, 2001 Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: JDC, INC. Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: J.W. JOHNSON [] individual [] Corporate Officer-- Title(s): · [] Parther--O Limited [] General I~ Attorney in Fact [] Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator n Other. Signer lsRepi'esenfing: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE: P.O. BOX 1227, BALTIMORE, MD 21203-1227 Know ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by W. B. WALBRECHER, Vice-President, and T. E. SMITH, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority, granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By-Laws of said Company, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full_~r~,{ and effe,...~ the date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint J. W. Johnson, of Fulierton, Cali[(IO~.l~,, its true,~t~l~Cfful agent and Attorney-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as sure--as its a~'~deed: any and all bonds and undertakings an the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pug~"~c"'e of thes.~/l~nts, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if th~x.~.e~.~.t. Vb.e.e.n d~z~cuted and acknowledged by the regularly elected of~cers of the Company at its once in Baltknor~., in the~.~ropor ~ons. This power of attorney revokes that i uedonbehalfof,. W.,oboson, dated janu a a9,8. The said Assistant Secretary does hereb.~.,.~il~y that _t~tract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of icle Section of the By- ws of. {$?pany, now in force. IN w~,r~ss wi-mREop, the said ~r,~sid~_ 'Xssis~,t SecreCy ha~e here,nto subsc,~d the~ names and aff'Lxed the Corporate Seal of the~s~:>FIDELIT~'~D DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 19th day of N'ovember, A.D. 1999, A't-1 ':~ ST: ' FIDELI'I'~ND [~SIT C OM PA NY OF MA RY LAND T. E. ~ ' tant 5'ecretary W. B. Walbrecher Yice-President StateofMaryland ) ss: County of Baltimore On this 19th day of November, A.D. 1999, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came W. B. Walbrecher, Vice-President and T. E. Smith, Assistant SecreUary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding insu'ument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding insmunent is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. Carol J Fa~e~ //~ ~ Notary Public y Comm~ss~o~ Expires: August 1, 2000 L142B-012-4152 CITYOF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PWO0-'I7 CITYWlDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM FYO0-OI This is to certify that ~ ~)~' t~c. , (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW00-17, CR'YWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM FY00-OI, situated in the City of Temecula, State of Califomia, more particularly described as follows: I I I I I I I I I I I I ClTYW1DE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM FY00-01 The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Ternecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. Dated: CONTRACTOR '~ Signature ~ Pdnt Name and ~fle RELEASE R:~IP~ROUEC~lT~BID DOC ITEM 15 -¢ APPROVAL ~///.~ ' CITY ATTORNEY ~ I DIRECTOR OF FINANCE _,,/~;~-~ CITY MANAGER ~J CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: I/City Manager/City Council ¢)~//~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 22, 2001 SUBJECT: Authorize a Temporary Partial Street Closure on Old Town Front Street for "Old Town Temecula Street Painting Festival" on June 2 and 3, 2001 PREPARED BY: ~,.~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ~lement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A PARTIAL STREET CLOSURE ON OLD TOWN FRONT STREET FOR THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL ON JUNE 2 AND 3, 2001 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT BACKGROUND: The City's first annual "Old Town Temecula Street Painting Festival" is scheduled for Saturday and Sunday, June 2 and 3, 2001 in Old Town Temecula. The Arts Council of Temecula Valley will be hosting this event in conjunction with the "Arts in the Count~' Festival. This new event will feature as many as 100 fine artists. Artists will paint chalk murals ranging in size from 4-foot by 6-foot to 10-foot by 12-foot blocks on the asphalt concrete pavement. The event begins at 8:00 AM on Saturday morning and ends at 5:00 PM on Sunday. Admission is free. A variety of programs will be offered at Sam Hicks Park. The event will require the closure of Old Town Front Street between Fifth Street and Second Street. However, full vehicular access will be maintained through Main Street and Third Street. Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing". The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way. While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was 1 R:~agdrpt\01\0522\TM28627.rowded[cation, provided for delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these special events. The recommended resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the "Old Town Temecula Street Painting Festival" Event sponsored by the Arts Council of Temecula Valley. This authority is limited to and delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject to the approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council. These rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated costs for services by the Public Works Department Maintenance Division, Police Department, Temecula Community Services District will be negotiated between the affected departments and the sponsors. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Street Closure Exhibit 2 R;~agdrpt\O 1\0522\TM28627.rowdedication RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A PARTIAL STREET CLOSURE ON OLD TOWN FRONT STREET FOR THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL ON JUNE 2 AND 3, 2001 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and, WHEREAS, The City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authorize the partial closure of Old Town Front Street for the "Old Town Temecula Street Painting Festival" Event sponsored by the Arts Council of Temecula Valley, for which a temporary street closure promotes the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those streets for the special event; and, WHEREAS, The City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily close Old Town Front Street for the "Old Town Temecula Street Painting Festival"; and, NOW WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve temporary closure for the "Old Town Temecula Street Painting Festival" Event sponsored by the Arts Council of Temecula, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the "Old Town Temecula Street Painting Festival" Event on June 2 and 3, 2001. 3 R:~gdrpt\0 l\0522\TM28627.rowdedication PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of May, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 4 R:~agd rpt\O 1\0522\TM28627.rowdedication (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001-. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of May, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 5 R:~agdrpt\01\0522\TM28627.rowdedication STREET PAINTENG FESTIVAL Hours 8-5 Street Closures 7 a~. Sat-5 p.m. Sunda~. a. street painting B. Music/band C. Vendors (tables at e. ach end of town. with tents at barricades will be information tents for f~stival) ROAD CLOSURES: (in red) block to block Fifth/Front to Fourth/Front Fourth/Front to Main/Front Main/Front to Third/Front If needed Third/f~ont to Second/Front ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~.~_~ CiTY MANAGER ClTY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council ~/V.~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 23371-1 located North of Rancho California Road, East of Margarita Road, West of Meadows Parkway, South of La Serena Way and within the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199, Temeku Hills Subdivision. PREPARED BY: /-~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (~lement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23371-1) BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 23371-1 was approved bythe City Council on March 27, 1990. The owner chose to retain all interior streets, and so designated private streets on the final map. Therefore, right of way was not dedicated to the public on the final map. On December 10, 1996, the City Council accepted an offer of dedication of right of way for street purposes as well as a separate offer of dedication for sidewalk and utility purposes. On January 16, 1997, the County Recorder of the County of Riverside recorded the offers of dedication for street purposes and sidewalk and utility purposes as Instrument Nos. 015933 and 015928 respectively. Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. Therefore, the final one-year warranty bond was released. All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released. The public streets now being accepted by this action are Tee Drive, Flag Way, Canterbury Court, and Temeku Drive between Tee Drive to the south and the Metropolitan Water District Fee Right of Way to the north. Royal Birkdale Drive is bonded separately as part of Tract Map No. 28482-1 and will be accepted into the City Maintained Street System along with that map's interior streets. The portion of Rancho California Road within the Tract Map No. 23371-1 boundary has already been accepted into the City Maintained Street System. The portion of Meadows Parkway within the Tract Map No. 23371-1 boundary has been bonded separately as part of Tract Map No. 28482-1 and will be accepted into the City Maintained Street System along with those streets. I r:~agdrpt\.2001\0522\tr23371-1 .acceptstreets FISCAL IMPACT: AI'I'ACHMENT: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Location Map Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. __ with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. 2 r:',agdrpt~.2001\0522\tr23371-1 .acceptstreets RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM 0/VITHIN TRACT NO. 23371- 1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, On December 10, 1996, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication of right of way for street purposes made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership as a separate document recorded on January 16, 1997 as Instrument No. 015933: and, WHEREAS, On December 10, 1996, the City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication for sidewalk and utility purposes made by Temeku Hills Development Partners, LP, a California Limited Partnership as a separate document recorded on January 16, 1997 as Instrument No. 015928: and, WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed: and, WHEREAS, All bonds pertaining to this tract have been released, including the final warranty bond: and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City-Maintained-Street System that street and portion of street offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of May, 2001. Jeff Comemhero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 r:~agd rpt\.2001~522\tF23371-1 ,acceptstreets STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of May, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 4 r:~agdrpt\.2001~0522\tr23371-1 .acceptstreets EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2001-.__ Accepting several of the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 23371-1 into the City-Maintained Street System as described below: Those portions of Tract Map No. 23371-1 in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, as filed in Book 216, Pages 8-16 Inclusive, of Maps, in the Recorder's Office of said county, particularly described as follows: 1. Lot "C" (Tee Drive) of said Tract Map No. 23371-1: 2. Lot "D" (Temeku Drive between Tee Drive and Royal Birkdale Drive) of said Tract Map No. 23371-1: Lot "E" (Temeku Drive between Royal Birkdale Drive and the Metropolitan Water District's Fee Right of Way) of said Tract Map No. 23371-1: 4. Lot "G" (Flag Way) of said Tract Map No. 23371-1: 5. Lot "H" (Canterbury Court) of said Tract Map No. 23371-1 TOGETHER WITH Portions of Tract 23371-1 as filed in Book 216 Pages 8 through 16 inclusive of Maps, and portions of Parcel 3 and Parcel 5 per Amended Parcel Map 21884 as filed in Book 152 pages 22 through 31 inclusive of Parcel Maps, all Records of Riverside County, California, located in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: That portion of Lot 25 and Lots 14 through 18 inclusive of said Tract 23371-1, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide, lying Westerly of and adjacent to the Westerly sideline of Lot "D" and Lot "E" as shown on said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolongated to terminate on the Southwesterly line of said Lot 25 and the Westerly line of said Lot 14 of said Tract 23371-1; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 9 through 13 inclusive of said Tract 23371-1, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide, lying Southwesterly of and adjacent to the Southwesterly sideline of Lot "E" as shown on said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolongated as to terminate on the Westerly line of said Lot 9 and the Easterly line of said Lot 13; TOGETHER WITH 5 r:~agd rpt\.2001~0522\t r23371-1 .acceptstreets That portion of Lots 9 through 17 of said Tract 23371-1, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide, lying Northerly of and adjacent to the Northerly sideline of Lot "H" as shown on said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Westerly line of said Lot 9 and on the Southerly line of said Lot 17; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 13 of said tract 23371-1, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land lying adjacent to and 6.50 feet Northwesterly of and all of said Lot 13 lying Southeasterly of the following described line: BEGINNING at the Westerly terminus of the 24.00 foot radius curve concave Northwesterly on the Southerly line of said Lot 13; THENCE North 65039'09'' East a distance of 32.64 feet to the Easterly terminus of said curve and the POINT QF TERMINATION. The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolongated as to terminate on the Southerly and Easterly lines of said Lot 13 of said Tract 23371 - 1; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 13 of said Tract 23371-1, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 6.00 feet wide, lying Northwesterly of and adjacent to the Northwesterly sideline of Lot "G" as shown on said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said Strip are to be shortened or prolongated as to terminate perpendicular to the Easterly terminus of the 24.00 foot radius curve concave Northerly on the Southerly line of said Lot 13 and on the Southerly line of Lot "E" of said Tract 23371-1; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Pamel 3 of said Amended Parcel Map 21884, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 2.50 feet wide, lying Northerly of and adjacent to the Northerly sideline of Lot "E" as shown on said Tract 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northerly line of said Parcel 3, and on the Northerly line of Lot "F" of said Tract 23371-1; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 1 through 8 and Lots 18 through 24 of said Tract 23371-1, more particularly described as follows: 6 r:~gdrpt~.2001~522\t r23371-1 .acceptstreets A strip of land 2.50 feet wide, lying Southwesterly of and adjacent to the Southwesterly sideline of Lot "H" as shown on said Tract 23371 -1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northerly line of said Lot 8, and on the Northerly line of said Lot 18; TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lot 14 said Tract 23371-1, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land 2.50 feet wide, lying Southeasterly of and adjacent to the Southeasterly sideline of Lot "G" as shown on said map 23371-1; The sidelines of said strip are to be shortened or prolonged as to terminate on the Northeasterly line of Lot "H", and on the Southwesterly line of said Lot "E"; EASEMENT ADDITION: Augmented by an easement 5.00 on both sides of and extending 5.00 feet beyond all street lighting appurtenances including, but not limited to, pull boxes, poles and guy wires. Subject to all covenants, conditions, rights, reservations, rights of way and easements if any of record. 7 r:~agdrpt\.2001~522\tr23371-1 .acceptstreets E .? ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/Ci~ Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning May 22, 2001 Roripaugh Specific Plan - Project Update PREPARED BY: Saied Naaseh RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND: On April 24~h the City Council directed staff to process the Roripaugh Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and bring it forward to the City Council for a public hearing on August 15, 2001. To that end, staff has prepared a schedule (attached), met v~th the applicant to discuss the schedule, and worked towards completing the items on the scheduled within the agreed upon time frames. As part of the EIR review process, staff provided comments to the applicant on May 7th. One of staff's main areas of concern was the inadequacy of the traffic study that was submitted. An updated traffic study has been requested of the applicant and will be submitted to staff on May 18th. Staff will then have the weekend to review the study and provide final comments to the applicant on May 21st. The EIR consultant then needs to incorporate the information from the Traffic Study into the EIR and allow staff to review the changes prior to finalizing the EIR for distribution on May 23rd. The EIR must be distributed on May 23rd to adhere to the agreed upon schedule. Should there continue to be problems with the traffic study or any other part of the EIR, there is a chance the hearing date could slip. Other than the Traffic Study, there are many other issues that need to be addressed in the EIR prior to its distribution. Staff has provided comments to the applicant on a timely basis. However, the applicant was late in submitting the EIR revisions to staff which were due on May 14th at 9:00 am. Instead, the revisions were submitted to staff on May 15th at 9:30 am. Staff will revise the schedule as necessary to allow us adequate time to review the revisions. As indicated, the schedule for this project is very tight and any missed deadlines could lead into a delay in the agreed upon hearings dates. FISCAL IMPACT: N~A ATTACHMENTS: Roripaugh Ranch Time Lines R:\S P\Roripaugh Ranch SP\CC status Report May 22.doc 1 0 ITEM 18 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/Ci~)~,,BciI Debbie Ubnosk~Director of Planning May 22, 2001 Request for Waiver of Application Filing Fee for PA01-0147 PREPARED BY: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning RECOMMENDATION: 0147. Provide direction to staff on waiving the application filing fee for PA01- BACKGROUND: On May 2, 2001 the Planning Commission approved PA01-0147 a variance for a 7-feet encroachment into the required 15-foot side yard setback for a single-family residence located at 30464 Bogart Place. This variance was requested to allow the applicant to construct an additional room to accommodate a permanently handicapped family member who will be living with him long term. The Development Code does allow Minor Exceptions to be filed and approved that allow a 20% encroachment into a setback. The approval of a Minor Exception would have permitted the applicant a 3-foot encroachment and that would not have been enough to accommodate the additional room. The residence is a two story single family home with all of the bedrooms located on the second floor. Through the approval of this variance, the applicant will now be able to construct a bedroom for his brother on the first floor. The lot width is 62 feet, which exceeds the typical lot width in the neighborhood of 50 feet. In addition, the home has a 40 foot rear yard setback which exceeds the minimum of 20 feet and the combined side yard setbacks total 23 feet which exceeds the minimum combined requirement of 15 feet. Petitions submitted with the application indicate broad neighborhood support for the request. This variance is one of less than 5 variances that have been submitted since the City incorporated and it is the only variance that has dealt with a handicapped access issue. Due to the hardship involved, the applicant has requested a waiver of the application filing fee. The City Council is the only body that may approve such a waiver. R:\planning.cc staff report.pa014) 147.doc FISCAL IMPACT: The application fee for a variance is $1,954.00. Should the Council choose to approve this request, the Citywould refund this amount. ATFACHMENTS: Planning Commission staff report dated May 2, 2001 R:\planning.cc staff report.pa014)147.doc 2 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING Cl'rY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 2, 2001 Planning Application No. 01-0t47 (Variance) Prepared By: Rick Rush, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA01- 0147 pursuant to Section 15305 of the California Environmental Quality ACt Guidelines. 2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 0t- 0147 A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 230 SQUARE FOOT ROOM ADDITION TO ENCROACH 7 FEET INTO THE REQUIRED 1,5- FOOT EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK, LOCATED AT 30464 BOGART PLACE, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 919- 461-009. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: Rick Ford, 30464 Bogart Place, Temecula, CA 92591 Design and construction of a 230 square foot room addition to a single-family residence that will encroach 7 feet into the required 15-foot exterior side yard set back comer side yard setback. 30464 Bogart Place (APN 919-461-009). LM (Low Medium Density Residential) LM (Low Medium Density Residential) North: South: East: West: LM (Low Medium Density Residential) LM (Low Medium Density Residential) LM (Low Medium Density Residential) LM (Low Medium Density Residential) Single Family Residence R:\VAdance~01-0147 Rick Ford~Staff report 147pa01.doc 1 SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Single Family Residence South: Single Family Residence East: Single Family Residence West: Single Family Residence PROJECT STATISTICS Total Area: Existing Building Area Proposed Building Area 6,758 square feet 1,700 square feet 1,900 square feet (.15 acre) 25.1% 28.1% BACKGROUND The application was submitted to the Planning Department on March 26 and the project was deemed complete on April 15, 2001. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting a Variance for the design and construction of a 230 square foot room addition that will encroach 7 feet into the exterior side yard setback. The applicant is requesting the variance to accommodate a permanently handicapped family member who will be living with him long term, and who is solely dependent on the applicent for housing support. The residence is a two story single-family residence, with all of the bedrooms on the second floor. Granting the variance will allow the applicant to build a ground level bedroom that will provide handicapped aCCessibility and ground level living space. ANALYSIS Variance The Planning Commission may approve a variance if the findings outlined in Code Section 17.04.040 (F) can be made. Staff is aware that handicap accessibility is not a legal basis for granting a variance, however staff can make the required findings based on legitimate physical site conditions. The parcel width is 62 feet, which exceed the typical lot width in the neighborhood of 50 feet. As a comer lot, and addition on the exterior side will have minimal visual impact on the surrounding properties, as compared to an interior lot with 5-foot side yard setbacks. In this case, the home has a 40-foot rear yard setback, which exceeds the minimum required 20 feet; and the combined side yard setbacks total 23 feet, which exceeds the minimum combined requirement of 15 feet. The addition will encroach 7-feet into the exterior setback, and the photo-simulation indicates that the structure will not adversely impact the visual quality of the neighborhood. Petitions submitted with the application indicate bread neighbor support for the request. Architecture The proposed design will be architecturally compatible with the existing residence and with the surrounding residences. The roof tile, stucco, and paint will all match the existing materials. The preexisting landscaping will screen the majority of the elevation fronting Bogart Street. R:~VAriance~l-0147 Ri~ Fore'Staff report 147po01.doc 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project for compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. Based upon staffs review, the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption (Class 5- Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) pursuant to Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the following reasons: · The proposed project is a minor alteration in land use limitations with an average slope of less than 20% and does not result in a change to land use or density. · The proposed project is a side yard set back variance and does not result in the creation of any new parcel. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Low Medium Density Residential (LM). Existing zoning for the site is Low Medium Density Residential (LM). A variety of residential uses are permitted within this zone, with the approval of a Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project as proposed, meets ali other minimum standards of and is consistent with, the General Plan, Development Code and the Design Guidelines. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The granting of the vadance will recognize the unique placement of the home on the lot and will prevent unnecessary hardships that might result from a strict or literal interpretation of the Code. The overall sentiment of the surroundings residents is to support the granting of the variance. Nine of the Ford's closest neighbors have signed a petition in support of the variance. We believe a vadance for the room addition would be compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development, and will represent an attractive addition to the neighborhood. FINDINGS - VARIANCE There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are not shared by other properties in the zone. Other properties in the zone not on a comer lot are permitted to have a combined side yard set back of 15 feet. The setback for comer lots in this zone have created an unnecessary hardship for this property and strict application of the code will not afford the applicant the ability have a total of a 15 foot set back shared by the majority of the other properties in the zone. Construction of a bedroom off the rear of the home would require relocation and reconfiguration of the kitchen as well. The applicant did not create the cimumstances and characteristics for the variance. The original plotting of the home on the lot created the circumstances and characteristics, which prevent the ground level construction of a bedroom without major modifications of the home. This variance does not grant special privileges, which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The majodty of the surrounding residences are permitted to have a total of 15 feet side yard set backs. The design of the project has taken public welfare and safety into account and will not be in any way detrimental to the public welfare. The variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties. The variance does not permit uses, which are not otherwise allowed in the Low Medium Density Residential Zone (LM). R:\VAriance~l-0147 Rick Ford~Staff repor~ 147pa01.doc 3 Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8 Exhibits - Blue Page 11 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan R:\VAdance~01-0147 Ric~ Ford~Staff repo~1147pa01.doc 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001- R:~VAriance~01-0147 Rick FordtStaff report 147pa01.doc 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01- 0t47 A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 230 SQUARE FOOT ROOM ADDITION TO ENCROACH SEVEN (7) FEET INTO THE REQUIRED15 FOOT EXTERIOR SlDEYARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 30464 BOGART PLACE, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 919-461-009. WHEREAS, Rick Ford flied Planning Application No. 01-0147, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 01-0147 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 01-0147 on May 2, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by taw, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 01-0147; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 01- 0147 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.040. (F) of the Temecula Municipal Code: There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are not shared by other properties in the zone. Other properties in the zone not on a comer lot are permitted to have a combined side yard set back of 15 feet. The setback for corner lots in this zone have created an unnecessary hardship for this property and strict application of the code will not afford the applicant the ability have a total of a 15 foot set back shared by the majority of the other properties in the zone. Construction of a bedroom off the rear of the home would require relocation and reconfiguration of the kitchen as well. The applicant did not create the circumstances and characteristics for the variance. The original plotting of the home on the lot created the circumstances and characteristics, which prevent the ground level construction of a bedroom without major modifications of the home. This variance does not grant special privileges, which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The majority of the surrounding residences are permitted to have a total of 15 feet side yard set backs. The design of the project has taken public welfare and safety into account and will not be in any way detrimental to the public welfare. R:~VAdance~O1-0147 Rick Ford~Staff repot[ 147pa01.doc 6 4. The variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties. 5. The variance does not permit uses, which are not otherwise allowed in the Low Medium Density Residential Zone (LM). Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01- 0147 was made per the Califomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations, Class 5). This project is an in-fill development and it meets the following criteria: · The proposed project is a minor alteration in land use limitations with an average slope of less than 20% and does not result in a change to land use or density. · The proposed project is a side yard set back variance and does not result in the creation of any new parcel. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. 01-0147 for Variance to build a 230 square foot room addition located at 30464 Bogart Place, known as Assessors Parcel NO. 919-461-009. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 2~ day of May 2001. ATTEST: Ron Guerdero, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 01- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of May, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\VAriance~1-0147 Rick Forcl~Staff report 147pan1.doc 7 EXHIBITA CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN R:~VAriance~01-0147 RJc~ Fordt. Staff report 147pa01.doc 8 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. 0t-0t47 (Variance) Project Description: A variance to permit a 230 square foot room addition to a single-family residence to encroach seven (7) feet into the corner side yard setback, located at 30464 Bogart Place and also known as Assessors Parcel No. 919-461- 009. DIF Category: Residential Assessor Parcel No,: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 919-461-009 May 2, 2001 May 2, 2003 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy- eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permitteelapplicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. R:\VAdance~31-0147 Rick Ford~Staff repor1147pa01.doc 9 The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year pedod which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 4. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the existing colors and materials used on the residence. Any deviation from these colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 5. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 6. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 7. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals pdor to commencement of any construction work. 8. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. 9. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. 10. Provide housc c~ectricel meters at each building for the purpose of providing power for fire alarm systems and extedor lighting. 11. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date R:~VAfiance~)1-0147 Rick Ford~Staff report 147pa01.doc 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:\VAriance~01-0147 Ric~ Ford~Staff report 147pa01.doc 11 CiTY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0147 (Variance) EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - May 2, 2001 VICINITY MAP R:\Vadance~01-0147 Ric~k Ford~Staff report 147pa01.d~c 12 CITY OF TEMECULA ~ .... EXHIBIT B DESIGNATION - BP ~ Park} ZONING MAP EXHIBIT C DESIGNATION - BP (Business Park)_ GENERAL PLAN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-00147 (Variance) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - May 2, 2001 R:~Variance~01-0147 Ric~ Fo[d~Staff report 147pa01.doc 13 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MARCH 6, 2001 An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:48 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. PresidentComercheropresiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, and Stone ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 27, 2001. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No comments. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT No comments. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. Minutes.csd~030601 I ADJOURNMENT At 7:38 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 27, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.csd~030601 2 TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services May 22, 2001 Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi-Trail System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the committee selected KTU& Associates as the top ranked firm. The Board of Directors awarded a contract to KTU&A on March 28, 2000. A trails questionnaire was mailed out to the residents in mid-September with approximately 450 responses returned. The consultant continues to work on acquiring easements for a Citywide trail system. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of an aquatic facility to be constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Directors approved a Scope of Services Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one ranked firm, RJM Design Group. The architect and project design committee has completed the schematic design of the project. The Board of Directors approved the Master Plan on June 27, 2000, and awarded a contract to RJM Design Group on July 11, 2000, for the Phase II of the Design Contract. The construction documents are complete and staff anticipates going out to bid in the next 30 days. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of a sports complex to be constructed in the City. Statements of Qualifications were received on February 16, 2000, and interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on March 28, 2000. A design contract was awarded to RJM Design Group at the May 23, 2000, Board of Directors meeting. The first sub- committee was held on November 7, 2000. With the adoption of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan at the January 23, 2001 City Council meeting, it has been determined the 40 acre sports park will be located in the Wolf Creek development. A community workshop was held on April 7, 2001, and the architect is drafting a plan based on the information compiled from the workshop and the sports league questionnaires. A committee meeting is scheduled for May 22, 2001. The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adopted at the September 26, 2000 City Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and specifications for the Temecula Public Library. LPAis currentlyworking on construction documents for submittal for first plan check. R:~ZIGLERG~XDEPTRJ3T~0501 .doc May 17, 2001 On June 15, 2000, staff released an RFQ requesting a Statement of Qualifications to prepare a feasibility study for the development of a Water Park. A contract was awarded to the Natelson Company at the September 27, 2000 City Council Meeting, for the preparation of the Water Park Feasibility Study. A community workshop was held and the consultant completed the intercept surveys. The consultant has compiled the information received from the community workshop and intercept surveys and the draft feasibility study was presented to the Community Services Commission on May 14, 2001. Staff released an RFQ for the children's museum interior space planning, exhibit design, fabrication, construction and installation. Interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on October 17, 2000. Staff began negotiations with the top ranked firm, Sparks Exhibits and Environments. The Agreement and Scope of Services was approved by the City Council on December 12, 2000. The committee has been meeting and has proposed naming the facility "Imagination Workshop, The Temecula Children's Museum". A staff report went forward to the Community Services Commission on May 14, 2001, and they unanimously approved a recommendation to the City Council to name the facility. The next committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 5, 2001. The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects within the City including Wolf Creek, Roripaugh and Harveston, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities. The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance Division assists in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation Division is currently in the planning stages for several citywide special events including the July 1, 2001 Vail Ranch Annexation Celebration, 4th of July Parade and Fireworks Program, and the Summer Concert Series. Additionally, the Summer/Fall issue of the Guide to Leisure Activities in nearly complete and staff anticipates the brochure will be mailed to City residents the first week of June. The Recreation Division continues to program classes, activities and excursions at all City recreation facilities. R:~ZIGLE RGXXDEPTRPTX0501 .doe May 17, 2001 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 6, 2001 An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:48 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 27, 2001. MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comments. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS A. Agency Member Stone encouraged staff to explore the submittal of a State application for the Enterprise Zone Designation for industrial park areas within the City. R:\Minutes.rda\030601 1 ADJOURNMENT At 7:40 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Chairman A'FI'EST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes.rda\030601 2 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Redevelopment Director May 22, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of May 22, 2001 for the Redevelopment Department. First Time Homebuyers Pro,ram Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 00-01. One loan has closed for $24,000. Residential Improvement Prof:lrams The program budget for FY 00/01 is $250,000 and $186,594 has been funded. Affordable Housinq Two projects have been submitted for preliminary review. One project is from the Agency's development partner, the other from a property owner who is also interested in developing affordable housing. Staff is analyzing these proposals. Senior Housin.q Agency staff is negotiating with a development partner to rehab 96 units for affordable senior housing. A senior housing demand study is being conducted. Old Town Community Theater The Redevelopment Agency Board approved the Community Theater's Master Plan at its meeting of April 24, 2001. The Architect has begun the next Phase of the design, which includes design development and construction drawings. R:~SYERSK~VlONTHLLY~eport.rnayO 1 .doc Facade Improvement/Non-Conforming Sign Program The following facade improvement/sign projects have recently been completed: · Rooster Creek Crossing Signs · Rhythem & Brews Signs · The Health Insurance Agency Signs · The Old Tin Box Signs · Waves of Beauty Signs The following facade improvements are underway: · M & M Art and Frame Signs · Y's & O's Signs · Old Town Plaza Shopping Center Replacement Exterior and Signs for all units · Old Town Promotions/Marketing The Dixieland Jazz Festival was held on May 12 & 13 and featured 7 bands and several antique appraisers. The Agency is also sponsoring several other events over the next few months. The events include the Street Painting Festival scheduled for June 2 & 3 featuring numerous artists displaying their chalk art on the streets of Old Town and Summer Nights featuring a variety of live entertainment, which is scheduled to begin July 6 and run through September 28, 2001. R:\SYERSK~MONTHLLY~'eport.may01 .doc ITEM 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager'~'' May 22 2001 Weed Abatement Liens f.,or FY 2000-01 APPROVAL CITYATTORNEY DIR.OFFINANCE CITY MANAGER PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Adopt a Resolution Entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION BACKGROUND: Weed abatement activity for the 2000-01 season has been completed and part of this process results in the City performing forced abatement of noncompliant parcels. The owners of these parcels are billed for the actual abatement costs plus an administrative fee. If the owners do not respond to the billing, the City is required to place a lien on the property to recover the costs. The lien process requires that a public hearing be held before the City Council to hear comments from the property owners with respect to the costs proposed to be assessed against their properties and to confirm those costs. Following the public hearing, the Council must adopt a resolution for the fiscal year which: · Confirms the costs incurred by the City in performing the weed abatement work. · Provides that the actual abatement costs will become a lien upon the properties and upon recordation, in the amount of the costs. · Provides that the resolution will be transmitted to the Riverside County Treasurer-Tax Collector so the amounts of the assessments would be entered upon the parcels as they appear on the on the assessment rolls and the costs will be collected on the propertytax bill. R:\BROWNS\Code\weed abatement lien-reso 2001X2.doc 1 After the City Council adopts the resolution it will be transmitted to the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Riverside and the Recorder for recordation. FISCAL IMPACT: The recording of these assessments will enable the City to recover abatement costs through proper~y tax collection. A'I-rACHMENTS: Resolution No. 01- Exhibit "A" Abatement Charges, Fiscal Year 2000-01 R:\BROWNS\Code\weed abatement lien-reso 2001X2.doc 2 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION WHEREAS, following a public hearing held on April 23, 1991, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Ordinance No. 91-18 which became effective on June 28, 1991 and which provides for expedited abatement of hazardous vegetation from vacant lots and parcels, and; WHEREAS, said abatement of hazardous vegetation has been completed on each of the pamels as described in the attached list of parcels (Exhibit "A"), as a cost equal to the cost of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation on each such parcel; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing were held concerning the cost of abatement of these parcels and the Council heard all objections of property owners liable to be assessed for the costs of abatement, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. All of the recitals herein set forth are tru and correct, and the City Council so finds and determines. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, in regular session assembled on May 22, 2001, that the list of parcels and costs of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation for each parcel is hereby confirmed and that said costs shall constitute special assessments against the respective parcels of land, and are a lien on said land in the amount of respective parcels of land, and are a lien on said land in the amount of respective assessment. Section 3. Such liens shall attach upon recordation in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside of a certified copy of this Resolution, and that the City Clerk is hereby directed to make such recordation. Section 4. A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the Treasurer-Tax Collector who shall enter the amount of the respective assessments against the respective parcels of land as they appear on the current assessment roll, and shall collect said assessments at the same time in the same manner as ordinary municipal ad valorem taxes as provided in Section 39577 of the Government Code. R:Resos\01- 1 PASSES, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22''~ day of May, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 01- was duly and regularly adopted by the CitY Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this 22nd day of May, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:Resos\01- 2 Resolution No. 01- Exhibit "A" City of Temecula, abatement charges, Fiscal Year 2000-01 APN Ownership Information Amount 945-030-016 JOSE MAYORGA 290.95 909-290-001 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 $317.40 909-290-003 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 $272.45 909-290-004 TEMECULATWO PROPERTIES $272.50 909-290-005 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 $272.50 909-290-032 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 $284.90 909-290-035 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 $283.05 909-290-057 RANCHO CORE ASSOCIATES NO 2 $317.10 919-043-003 LEE SHIO C $267.15 919-082-005 DAVID ARELLANO $304.10 919-100-014 FERNS JAY $285.10 919-131-002 MAAG LEWIS E $348.70 919-131-005 CIANFRINI JOHN $434.35 919-184-004 SANCHEZ RICHARD A $260.90 919-230-016 WlTTPENN JENNIFER $417.45 919-240-006 MCKAY MARTHA& GARY $515.90 919-410-021 GRAY JOHN $230.00 921-060-044 RANCHO CALIFORNIA GATEWAY $272.65 921-060-046 RANCHO CALIFQRNIAGATEWAY $271.70 921-740-001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD $1,067.20 921-810-019 MARGARITA VILLAGE $422.90 921-211-001 CHARLES FIACCO $260.98 921-120-006 CHARLES RUSSELL $308.05 922-100-006 ROGER CHANG C/O PM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT $438.10 922-110-020 TED OROZCO $279.50 922-160-016 CSEPANYI GIORGIO $383.85 922-170-015 TEMECULA BEDFORD CT INV $339.92 922-170-009 YI HYO J $322.94 922-170-014 TEMECULA BEDFORD COURT INV $322.60 944-290-011 BRUCE HICKE CIO JKI MTG INC $748.10 944-330-008 PROJECT DEVELOPERS GROUP $310.15 955-040-002 GIRGIS MAGDY F $309.20 957-120-005 MULHOLLAND LAND CO $1,035.00 945-030-015 RLCA DEV $296.45 952-030-001 TAYLORWOODROW HOMES CALIF LTD $542.05 952-030-002 TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CALIF LTD $462.50 921-020-079 LOT 9 INDUSTRIAL LTD CIO WESOON PROPERTY $397.00 920-090-077 $345.00 959-020-015 JOSEPH CHU $348.40 959-020-027 ROBERT STRONKS $369.80 959-020-004 JERRY LESSEL CIO SOUTHWEST FORECLOSORE SVC. $293.75 919-323-005 VICTOR SMITH $268.05 961-010-014 ALPINE GARDENS EAST INC. $290.23 MEADOWVlEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION $990.00 957-150-020 PETER CERNOVSEK $477.60 961-010-015 BRIAN SESKO $388.73 CALIFORNIA TRADEWlNDS HOMEOWNERS ASS. $339.65 921-810-017 MARGARITA VILLAGE $785.80 921-810-018 MARGARITA VILLAGE $268.4C 921-810-013 COSTCO WHOLESALE $260.70i Weed Properties to be liened 2000 $19,591H~J.5..__. 1 ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~¢William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Ordinance 2001- Prima Facie Speed Limit on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: entitled: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance ORDINANCE 2001- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) HONORS DRIVE BETVVEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND TEE DRIVE AND 2) TEMEKU DRIVE BETVVEEN TEE DRIVE AND LA SERNA WAY BACKGROUND: At the meeting of February 22, 2001, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission received a request to review the feasibility of implementing Neighborhood Traffic Calming measures on Temeku Drive to mitigate vehicular volumes and speeds caused by cut-through traffic. The Commission was advised that the majority of vehicles traveled in excess of the 30 MPH posted speed limit. Staff responded that the existing posted speed limit was arbitrarily established by the developer without an Engineering and Traffic Survey to support the speed limit as required in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). A survey of vehicular speeds and volumes was conducted in January 2001, along Temeku Drive to determine vehicular patterns prior to the opening of Meadows Parkway. Following the opening of Meadows Parkway a survey of vehicular volumes was performed at the same locations during the same consecutive seven-day period. In addition to the volume data collected a radar speed survey was conducted on Temeku Drive and Honors Drive. The results of the analysis were presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at their meeting of April 26, 2001 (Exhibit "A"). Following a public hearing and lengtl~y discussion, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommended that the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing a 35 MPH speed zone on Temeku Drive and Honors Drive and that the Police Department enforce the newly established speed limit including the use of the radar speed trailer. In 1997, the City Council adopted an Ordinance amending Specific Plan No. 199. The amendment included the designation of streets within Temeku Hills for combined use of vehicles and golf carts as prescribed in CaJifornia Vehicle Code Section 21115, "Golf Carts on Local Highways" (Exhibit "B"). This section authorizes golf carts to legally travel on highways with regular vehicular traffic. 1 r:~agdrp¢2001 \0522~SPDLIMIT.ord Under this section golf carts are not required to be registered, licensed or equipped with safety features (except if operated during darkness) to travel on the designated public streets. The section also authorizes the local authorityto prescribe the rules and regulations, which shall have the force of the law. A concern was raised at the Commission meeting that because of the designation under CVC Section 21115, the proposed speed limit of 35 MPH was unreasonable and illegal and that Temeku Drive and Honors Drive should be posted at 25 MPH as prescribed in CVC Section 21716, "Golf Cart Operation" (E~ibit "C"). This section states that "e~cept as provided in Section 21115.1, no person shall operate a golf cart on any highway except in a speed zone of 25 MPH or less". This section applies only to the operation of golf carts that are registered, licensed and equipped with safety features, on local highways. However, the section does not apply to local highways, such as Temeku Drive and Honors Drive, which have been designated under CVC Section 21115. Therefore, CVC Section 21716 cannot be applied to Temeku Drive or Honors Drive and the posted speed limit must be established as prescribed in CVC Section 22358 on the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. An Engineering and Traffic Survey as described in the CVC, is a sur~ey of the prevailing speeds, accident records and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist. In April 2001, an Engineering and Traffic Survey was performed on Honors Drive and Temeku Drive. Based on the results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey, staff determined that a posted speed limit of 35 MPH could be supported on Honors Ddve/Temeku Drive between Margarita Road and Royal Birkdale and a posted speed limit 40 MPH could be supported on Temeku Drive between Royal Birkdale and La Serena Way. However, because of the golf cart designation a 5 MPH reduction was recommended on Temeku Drive between Royal Birkdale and La Serena Way. Therefore, Staff recommends the establishment of a 35 MPH speed zone on Honors Drive between Margarita Road and Tee Drive and on Temeku Drive between Tee Drive and La Serena Way. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in Public Works Signing and Striping Account. ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Ordinance 2001- Exhibit "A" - Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report - April 26, 2001 Exhibit "B"- California Vehicle Code Section 21115 Exhibit "C" - California Vehicle Code Section 21716 2 r:~agdrpt~2001\0522~SPDLIMIT, ord ORDINANCE 2001- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) HONORS DRIVE BE'I'VVEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND TEE DRIVE AND 2) TEMEKU DRIVE BETWEEN TEE DRIVE AND LA SERNA WAY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order to determine the appropriate speed limits, WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segments of roadways designated in this Ordinance indicate that the following speed limits be established given the engineering and traffic studies. SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: "Name of Street and Portion Affected. Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit, Miles Per Hour Honors Drive- Margarita Road to Tee Drive 35 Temeku Drive - Tee Drive to La Serena Way 35 SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required bylaw. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of May 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor 3 r:~agdrpt~2001 ~0522~SPDLIMIT.ord ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2001- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the22"dday of May, 2001 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk 4 r:~gdrpt~001\0522\SPDLIMIT.ord EXHIBIT "A" TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic April 26, 2001 Iteru 4 Request for Neighborhood Traffic Calming - Temeku Drive RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend that the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing speed zones on Temelm Drive and Honors Drive; 2. Direct the Police Department to enforce the newly established speed limit including use of the radar speed trailer. BACKGROUND: At the meeting of February 22, 2001, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission received a request from Mr. Mark Wedel to review the feasibility of implementing Neighborhood Traffic Calming measures on Temeku Drive to mitigate vehicular volumes and speeds caused by cut-through traffic. Subsequently, Mr. Wedel met with staff and Chairperson Edwards to reiterate his concerns and explore possible solutions. Mr. Wedel was advised that the Commission would consider the issue at a future meeting, foll0wing the opening of Meadows Parkway. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process and by written correspondence. Temeku Drive/Honors Drive is a 44-foot wide residential collector street that provides access to numerous residential dwelling units between La Serena Way, Rancho California Road and Margarita Road. Access to the majority of Temeku Drive/Honors Drive is limited to street intersections except on the segment between Flag Way/Iverness Court and Surmingdale Drive where access is provided directly onto Temeku Drive for approximately 14 single-family residential units (3 existing and 11 proposed). The average daily traffic (ADT) volume on Temeku Drive is approximately 1,734 south of La Serena Way, 1,298 ADT north of Flag Way/Inverness Court, 2,331 ADT south of Royal Birkdale Drive and 2,198 ADT on Tee Drive north of Rancho California Road. The developer has posted the speed limit at 30 MPH along Temelm Drive. However, this speed limit is not an enforceable speed limit because it was not established by an Engineering and Traffic Survey as required in the California Vehicle Code. In January 2001, traffic volume data was collected at three (3) locations on Temelm Drive and at one (1) location on Tee Drive to determine vehicular travel patterns prior to the opening of Meadows Parkway. In addition to the traffic count data collection, a speed survey was performed on Temelm Drive. The speed and traffic count data was collected for a period of seven consecutive days. In April 2001, traffic count r:\traffi¢\commissn~agenda ~2001 \0426\Tcmelml~ive/ajp data was collected at the same locations for a similar seven-day period. Copies of the vehicular volume and speed data are included as Exhibits "B" and "C". The table below summarizes the results of the data collection: LOCATION 01/22/01 04/07/01 Temeku Drive S/O La Volume (ADT) 1,379 1,734 Serena Way Temeku Drive N/O Flag Volume (ADT) 1,711 1,298 Way/Ivemess Court Speed (85~ %) 41.5 MPH 43 MPH Temeku Drive S/O Par Volume (ADT) 2,467 2,331 Way Speed (85~ %) 38 MPH 40 MPH Tee Drive N/O Rancho Volume (ADT) 2,157 2,198 California Road. The before and after data collection indicates that although some segments experienced an increase in traffic volumes and others experienced a decrease, overall the traffic volumes decreased by approximately 2% with the opening of Meadows Parkway. In addition to the traffic count data, a radar speed survey was conducted in April 2001 on Honors Drive and Temeku Drive to determine vehicular speeds. As shown in the table above, the 85~ percentile speeds observed in April 2001 are slightly higher than those observed in January. The speed survey data was incorporated into the Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey, to determine an enforceable-posted speed limit. The results of the E&T Survey indicate that a posted speed limit of 35 MPH could be supported and deemed enforceable on Honors Drive between Margarita Road and Tee Drive and on Temeku Drive between Tee Drive and Royal Birkdale Drive. The E&T Survey revealed that a posted speed limit of 40 MPH could be supported and deemed enforceable on the segment, between Royal Birkdale Drive and La Serena Way. Although, there may be a perception that vehicles are traveling at a high rate of speed on Temeku Drive, the 85x~ percentile speeds and enforceable speed limits are consistent with speed limits observed on other City streets that are residential collector streets such as, Amarita Way/Montelegro Way (40 MPH), Leena Way (40 MPH) and Sunny Meadows Drive (40 MPH). Having an unjustified posted speed limit of 30 MPH further compounds the perception that motorists are traveling too fast. It is staffs opinion that the majority of drivers are traveling at a safe and prudent speed for conditions on Temeku Drive. Copies of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are included as Exhibit "D". The concerns expressed about the high volume of "cut-through" traffic on Temeku Drive are not entirely supported by the results of the data collection. The before and after traffic volume data indicates that Temeku Drive carries 1,379 ADT to 2,157 ADT between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road. Collectively, the Temeku Golf Course development has approximately 1,351 single-family dwelling units (existing and under construction) that can potentially generate a traffic volume of 13,510 ADT. This volume is based on a trip generation rate of 10 trips per day per dwelling unit. With the completion of all the residential units, it is likely that Temeku Drive will carry between 2,500 ADT to 4,500 ADT. These volumes are based on trips generated by Temelm Hills residential units only. The total volumes shown are approximately 52% of what would normally be expected from the number of residential units within the community that have access to Temeku Drive and Honors Drive. Although it is the residents' perception that there is a high volume of "cut-through" traffic, it is staff's opinion that the majority of "cut-through' traffic observed by the residents is attributed to intra-subdivision trips between the Temelm Hills community. Moreover, it is staff's opinion that Temelm Drive and Honors Drive are being used as they were designed, to provide residential access to Margarita Road, Rancho California Road, Meadows Parkway, and La Serena Way. Based on our observations, there is no logical reason to use Temelm Drive as a "short-cut" since Meadows Parkway provides a more direct route between La Serena Way and Rancho 2 r:\traffic\commissn~agenda~2001\0426\TemelmDrive/ajp California Road. Moreover, it is a very circuitous route and there are no "real" timesavings by using Temelm Drive instead of Meadows Parkway. Insofar as the use of multi-way stop signs, it is staWs position that multi-way stop signs should be recommended where there is strong evidence that overall traffic safety can be improved and should not be used solely for controlling vehicular speeds or volumes. Studies have shown that when stop signs are installed at locations that do not satisfy the minimum warrant criteria, they become ineffective traffic control devices. Thus, by installing signs at unwarranted locations, some drivers become conditioned to disregard traffic controls such as speed limits, stop signs and signals. Those motorists who actually stop for the controls are forced to stop for no apparent reason. This often results in driver frustration and lack of respect to traffic control devices while doing nothing to address the real problem of speeding as our own studies have shown on Via Cordoba and Calle Medusa. For these reasons, staffis not recommending the installation of multi-way stop signs along Temeku Drive to address the residents' concerns. The consideration of other traffic control devices such as, speed undulations would not be considered an appropriate use on Temeku Drive because the 85~ percentile speed limit is greater that 25 MPH, the vertical alignment is greater than five percent in some areas, there are numerous curves along the roadway and the roadway serves as a residential collector street. More importantly, the speed undulations have not been embraced as an effective means of reducing vehicular speeds and volumes as experienced on Calle Pina Colada. For these reasons, staff is not recommending the use of speed undulations on Temeku Drive to address the residents' concerns. The results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey suggest that an appropriate and enfomeable speed limit on Temelm Drive and Honors Drive would be 35 MPH between Margarita Road and Royal Birkdale Drive and 40 MPH between Royal Birkdale Drive and La Serena Way. Therefore, staff recommends establishment of the appropriate speed zones, removal of the existing non-enfomeable 30 MPH speed limit signs, and enforcement of the newly established speed zone and use of the radar speed trailer. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available for signing and pavement markings in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Account. ARachment: 1. Exhibit "A' - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Vehicular Speed and Volume Data, January 2001 3. Exhibit "C' - Vehicular Speed and Volume Data, April 2001 4. Exhibit "D' - Engineering and Traffic Survey 3 r:\traffic\commissn\agendak2001 ~0426\TemekuDtiv~/ajp ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SECTION 627) Street: Honors Drive between Margarita Road and Tee Drive/Temeku Drive Year of Survey: 2001 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT ' Date of Survey Avril 17. 2001 50'h Percentile { 85~h Percentile 33 MPH J 37 MPH J l0 mph pace (% of vehicles) 29 TO 38 lvlPH (81.1%) Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH** PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered Mamh 1, 1999-March 31,2001 Number of Intersection 0 Accidents Mid-Block 0 Mid-Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0 Expected Mid-Block Accident Rate 1.90/MVM ~~ CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date of Observation Anril 18, 2001 Highway: Geometries, Numerous intersections, limited access(driveways, intersections, other) visibility due to horizontal and vertical alignment of roadway Traffic: Pedestrians, on-street parking Striped bike lane both sides of the turnover, school crossings, etc .... street , Roadside: Land uses not apparent Golf Course (park, school, etc...) other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL RE~S RECOMMENDED SPEED 35 MPH **Unjustified Speed Limit ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SECTION 627) Street: Temeku Drive between Tee Drive/Temeku Drive and Royal Birkdale Drive Year of Survey: 2001 ~111NG SPEED MEASUREMENT Date of Survey Aoril 17.2001 50~h Percentile [ 85t~ Percentile 32 MPH I 40 MPH 10 mph pace (% of vehicles) 27 TO 36 MPH (69%) Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH** PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered March 1. 1999-March 31. 2001 Number of Intersection 0 I Accidents Mid-Block 0 Mid-Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0 Expected Mid-Block Accident Rate 1.90/MVM 'ART IH: HIGHWAY, TILAFFIC AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date of Observation Aoril 18, 2001 Highway: Geometries, Numerous intersections, limited access(driveways, intersections, other) visibility due to horizontal and vertical alignment of roadway Traffic: Pedestrians, on-street parking Striped bike lane both sides of the turnover, school crossings, etc .... street Roadside: Land uses not apparent Golf Course (park, school, etc...) other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS RECOMMENDED SPEED 35 MPH **Unjustified Speed Limit ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SECTION 627) Street: Temeku Drive between Royal Birkdale Drive and La Serena Way Year of Survey: 2001 VAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Date of Survey April 17, 2001 50"' Percentile J 85~' Percentile 38 MPH J 43 MPH J 10 mph pace (% of vehicles) 32 TO 41 MPH (67.8%) Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH** PART 11: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered March 1. 1999- March 31. 2001 Number of Intersection 0 Accidents Mid-Block 0 Mid-Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0 Expected Mid-Block Accident Rate 1.90/MVM HIGHWAY, TRAFFIC AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date of Observation April 18,2001 Highway: Geometries, Numerous intersections, limited access(driveways, intersections, other) visibility due to horizontal and vertical alignment of roadwa)' Traffic: Pedestrians, on-street parking Striped bike lane both sides of the turnover, school crossings, ere .... street Roadside: Land uses not apparent Golf Course (park, school, etc...) other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS RECOMMENDED SPEED 40 MPH **Unjustified Speed Limi! ~ha!l be the sole responsibility of the local authority to enforce the provisio~ ~ of the Vehicle Code and all rules and regulations adopted by it upon ouch; street or road. Upon such designation be~orn;n~ effective it shall be lawfal to taxi ai.v.~; upon such street or road in accordance with the rules and rellulations prescribed as aforesaid and said alrcral~ need not be licensed, under ~ code or comply with other provisions thereof. £1ectric Certs on Sidewalks 21114.5. Notwithstanding Section 21663 or any other provision of thi~ code, local authorities may, By ordinance~ authorize the Operation of electric carts by physically disabled persons, by persons 50 years of age or,older, or, while in the course of their employment, by empl0Yeeol of the Uuit~d Stato~ P~ Service, state and local go~,ernmantal agencies, or utility companie~l, on ,public sidewAllr., Any ordinance shall, howeVer, contain pceVisioos requiring ahy disabled person m' perSOn 50 years of age or older who owns or leases, an electric cart to~app!y to the local authority for a permit an~i as identifiCation stlckbr to so operate the cart, &nd requiring ~Jae person to al~ the sticker to the cart in 0rder to operate it on the ~idewalk. The permit and sticker ahall become invelid ffthe person ceases to operate, own, or lease the This section does not apply to devices described in subdivision Co) of Section 415. ' ' .... · .Ameaded Se~ 125, Ch. 124. Stat~ 199~. Effective January 1 1997 '~o# Certs on I. on~l.l#glm,ays '21'I15.~ Ifa local authority finds that a highway under its jurimticti0n i~ located adjacent to, or provides access to, a golf course and between.the golf course and the-place where goff carts are parked or stored or is within or beunded'by a real estate development offering golf facilities and is designed and constructed, so ns to safely permit the use af regular vehicular traffic and also the driving of goff.carts on the highway, the local authority 'may by resolution og o~llnano, e[ designate the highway or portion of the highway for combined'uso and prescribe rules and regulations which shall have the force of law;.No highway slial! be so designated for a distance of more than one mile from the golf coume ffthe highway is not located withi~ a development or beyond the area of a development, provided, the finding of the local authority in thla respect ahall be conclusive. Upon the designation becoming effective it .hall be lawful to drive golf carts upon the highway in aCCOrdance with the prescribed rules and regulations.: The rules and regulations may establl.h mossing sones and speed limits and other operating standards but shall not require that the golf carts conform to any requirements of this code with respect to i~,,istration, licefising, or equipment, except that if oPeratod during darkness the golf cart shall be subject to .the provisions of Section 24001.5 regarding equipment.. · The rules and regulations shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice thereof are posted along the highway effected. .' A 'real estate development offering golf facilities~, for purposes of this section, means an.area of singie-family or multiple-family residences~ tho owners or occupants of which are eligible.for membership in, or the use of, one or more golf courses within the development by virtue of their ownership or occupancy afa residential dwelling unit in the development. .' Amended Ch, 389 Stat~ 1989. Effective January L 1990. Golf Cert Crossln§ Zones 21115.1. · (a) bl0t~vithstandln~ Section 21115, a local' authority may, by ordinanc~ or resolution, establish~croesing zones, for use by goff ca~s at any EXHiBIT"B" time other thRn during darkness; on any street, other than a state highway, which has a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour or less and which is immediately ac~acent to a golf course. The crossing zones shall be a~ an angle of approximately 90 degrees to the direction of the roadway. The ordinance or resolution shall not become effective until submitted to the law enforcement agency having primary jurisdiction over the street, the law enforcement agency finds and determines that the ~onditions pert~inlng to that street, with the addition of proper signs, markers, or lighting, or any combination of those, will permit the establishment' of a golf cart crossing with reasonable safety, and the signs, markers; or lighting specified by the law enforcement agency are in place. Co) Subdivision (a) does not constitute precedent for the operation of golf carts on any street or highway other than in a crossing zone established pursuant to subdivision (a). Added Ch. 192, Stats. 1991. Effect/ye J~usry 1, 1992. Amended Ch. 124~, Stats. 1992~ Effective September 30, 1992. Levees, Banks of Waterways, and Pipeline Rights-of-Way 21116. (a) No pe~on shal] d~ve any motor ve~cle upon a roadway located on a levee, c~n~! ben~ natural watercourse bank~ or pipeline right- of-way if the responsibility for maintenance of the levee, canal b~nl~ natural watercourse bank, or pipeline right-of-way is vested in the state or in a reclamation, levee, drainage, water or irrigation district, or other lecal sgency, unless such person has received permission to drive upon such roadway from the agency responsible for such maintenance, or unless such roadway has been dedicated as a public right-nf-way. . CO) For this section ~o. be applicable to a particular levee, cent! b~nk: natural watercourse bank, or.pipeline right-of-way, the state or other agency having responsibility for maintenance of the levee, canal benl~ natural watercourse b~,l~ or pipeline right-of-way, shall erect or place appropriate signs giving notice that permission is required to be obtained to drive a motor vehicle thereon and giving notice of any special conditions or regulations that are imposed pursuant to this section and shall prepare and keep available at the principal office of the state agency or other agency affected or of the beard of such agency, for e-Rmination by all interested pereons, a writton statement, in conformity with the existing rights of such agency to control access to the roadway, describing the nature of the vehicles, if any, to which such permission .might be granted and the conditions, regulations, and procedure for the acquisition of such permission adopted pursuant to this section. (c) Nothing in this section prohibits the establishment of hicycle paths or routes (es prescribed by Article 6.5 (commencing. with Section 5078) of Chapter i of Division.5 of the Public Resources Code) on levees, canal bznlr~ natural watercourse b~nl~, or pipeline r/ghte-of-way. Amended Ch. 1361, Stats. 1971. Operative May 3, 1972. LOCal AotbOritles: Transfer o! ResponslbilitisS: £cologiczi ~esetves and £n~lronmentell¥ Sensitlee Areas 21117. (a) Local authorities may, notwithstanding Section 21101 or 21.101.6, by written agreement approved by their legislative bodies, transfer among themselves the responsibility for maintaining, operating,, or controlling public access to any highway under their respective jurisdictions located in or adjacent to an ecolo~gical reserve or an environmentally sensitive area within their respective jur/sdictions. Co) An agreement entered into pursuant to subdivision (a) may authorize §21716 -~2-- DIV. 11 Golf Car~ Operation 21'/16. (a) Except as provided in Section 21115.1 and Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1950) of Division 2.5 of the Streets and Highways Code, no person shall operate a golf cart on any highway except in a speed zone of 25 miles per hour or leas. (b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2001; and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enac/ed on or before January 1, 2001, deletes or extends that date. Amended Ch. 192, Sta~. 1991. Effective Janusry 1, 1992. Amended CB. 44, Stats. 1992, Effective January 1, 1993. Amended Ch.598, Stats. 1994. Effective January 1, 1995. Repealed Ch. 598, Stats. 1994. Effective January 1, 1995. Operative January 1, 1998. Amended Se~ 3, Ch. 536, Stst~ 1997. Effective January 1,1998. NO?E: The preceglng section is repealeg Janua~ 1, 2001, at which time the fot[owln9 section becomes operative. 21716. (a). Except as provided in .Section 21115.1,. no person shall operate .a golf cart on any highway except in a speed zone of 25 miles per hour or less. (b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2001. Added Oh. 598, Stats. 1994. Effective January 1, 1995. Operative January 1, 1998. Repealed Sec. 14, Ch. 334, Stats. 1995. Effective January 1, 1996. Added Se~ 13, Ch. 334, Stats. 1995. Effective January 1, 1996. Operative January 1, 1998. Amended Sec. 4, Oh. 536, Stats. 1997. Effective January 1, 1998. Turning Across Bicycle Lane 21717. Whenever it is necessary for the driver of a rooter vshicle to cross a bicycle lane that is adjacent to his lane of travel to make'a turn, the driver shall drive the motor vehicle into the bicycle lane prior to mAlrlng the turn and shall make the turn pursuant to Section 22100. Added Ch.. 751, Stats. 1976: Effective January 1,1977. Stop, par~, or Leave Standing Upon a Freeway 21718. (a) No person shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle upon a freeway which has full control of access and no crossings at grade except: (1) When necessary to avoid injury or damage to persons or property. (2) When required by law or in obedience to a peace officer or official traffic control device. . (3) When any person is actually engaged in maintenance or construction on freeway property or any employee of a public agency is actually engaged in the performance of official duties. (4) When any vehicle is so disabled that it is impossible to avoid temporarily stepping and another vehicle has been summoned to render assistance to the disabled vehicle or driver of the disabled-vehicle. This paragraph applies when the vehicle summoned to render aasisto, uce is a vehicle owned by the donor of free emergency assistance that has been s~mmoned by disp!ay upon·or within a disabled vehicle of a placard or sign given to the driver of the disabled vehicle by the donor for the specific purpose of s~,mmoning assistance, other than towing service, from the donor. (5) Where stopping, standing, or parking is specifically permitted. However, buses may not step on freeways unless aldewall~ are provided with shoulders of sufficient width to permit stepping without interfering with the normal movement of traffic and without the possibility of crossing over fast lanes to reach the bus step. (6) Where necessary for any person to report a traffic accident or other situation or incident to a peace officer or any person specified in paragraph EXHIBIT "C" ITEM 21 APPROVAL CITYATTORNEY ~ DIRECTOR OFFINA~CE//--~ CITY MANAGER .~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Award the Construction Contract for Project No. PW01-07, FY2000-01 - Slurry Seal Project PREPARED BY: Ward Maxwell, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Receive an oral report on the bids recei',ed May 17, 2001. Award a construction contract for FY2000-2001 Slurry Seal Program and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of 10% of the contract documents. BACKGROUND: With the Pavement Management System (PMS) in place, a five (5) year Slurry Seal Project has been formulated. All streets within the City were physically inspected, evaluated and prioritized during the implementation of the Pavement Management System. Certain streets have been grouped into areas to provide the most cost-effective projects. This year's Slurry Seal Project will be using rubberized sealing agent called, "Rubberized Polymer Modified Emulsion (RPME)", which is a preventive maintenance measure where an asphalt concrete surface has become dry or brittle. This rubberized agent will be placed over the existing asphalt concrete pavement to replace the fine materials/oils and seal the pavement surface against water intrusion. This treatment will extend the life of the existing asphalt concrete pavement from five (5) to seven (7) years. The work to be performed in this project includes the following: Application of RPME, crack sealing, treatment of all oil stains, traffic control, and replacement of all striping and street legends. The Plans and Specifications are available for review in the City Engineer's office. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $312,568.00. The contractor will be required to maintain at least two lanes of traffic for each street at all times throughout the project. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Street Maintenance Account 001-164-601-5402. ATTACHMENT: Proposed Contract Form 1 R:~AGDRPT~.001\0522\PW01-07 AWD.DOC CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW01-07 FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 22nd day of May, 2001, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and , hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW01-07, FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction., including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW01-07, FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW01-07, FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 R:~CIP~PROJECTS~PW01\P~O1q37~ContracLdot The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW01-07, FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. Ail labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: DOLLARS and CENTS ($ ), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Forty-Five (45) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be CONTRACT CA-2 R:~CIP~PROJECTS~PW01~v01 ~)7~Contract, dot made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2%ofamountin excess orS75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the CONTRACT CA-.3 R:\ClP~PROJECTS~PW01~Pw01 ~7~Conb'act.dot 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an CONTRACT CA-4 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01~°w01-07~ConffacLdot 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, br in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. CONTRACT CA-5 R:~ClP~PROJECTS~PW01~v01-07~Contract.d0t 23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Mailing Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Street Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA~ R:~CIP~PROJECTS~PW01~w01-07~Contract.dot IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Name Address C~ty Phone By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-7 R:\ClP~PROJEOTS~PW01~:~vOl-07\OontracLdot TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~I CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Award the Construction Contract for Project No. PW01-07, FY2000-01 - Slurry Seal Project PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer -Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a construction contract for the FY2000-2001 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. PW01- 07, to American Asphalt Repair and Resurfacing Co. Inc. in the amount of $277,465.50 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $27,746.55, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: Three (3) bids for the project were publicly opened on May 17, 2001. The results of the bids are as follows: 1. American Asphalt Repair & Resurracing Co., Inc ........................ $ 277,465.50 2. Pavement Coatings Co ............................................................... $ 312,353.20 3. California Pavement Maintenance Co., Inc .................. - ............... $ 314,555.00 The engineer's estimate is $ 313,000. American Asphalt has extensive experience in slurry sealing, especially Rubberized Emulsion - Aggregate Slurry (REAS). They have successfully completed similar projects for the City in the past. The construction period for this project is 45 working days. Work is expected to begin in June 2001. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. FISCAL IMPACT: The FY2000-01 - Slurry Seal Project is funded with Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Funds. The total construction amount is $305,212.05, which includes the contract amount of $ 277,465.50 plus the 10% contingency amount of $ 27,746.55. Adequate funds are available for this project in Account No. 001-164-601-5402. ATTACHMENT: Contract R:~AG DRpT~2001 IO§22\PWO 1-OT,AWO SUPPLEMENTAL,DOC CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW01-07 FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 22nd day of May, 2001, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and, American Asphalt Repair and Resurfacing Company, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW01-07, FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW01-07, FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW01-07, FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 R:~ClP~PROJECTS~PW01~c~v01.07~ConbacLdot The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW01-07, FY2000-2001 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the previsions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CiTY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS and FIFTY CENTS ($277,465.50), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Forty-Five (45) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be CONTRACT CA-2 R:~CIP~PROJECTS~PW01~v01~7~ContmcLdot made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2%ofamountin excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIMF In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the CONTRACT CA-3 R:~ClP~PROJECTS~PW01~ow01~7~Conffact dot 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an CONTRACT CA~1 R:~CIP~PROJECTS~PW01~01~7~ContmcLdot 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractodconsultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. CONTRACT CA-5 R:~ClP~PROJECTS~PW01~O1q37~ContracLdot 23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Mailing Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Street Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-6 R:\ClP~PROJECTS~PW01~v01-07~Contract.dot IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR American Asphalt Repair and Resurfacing Co,, Inc. 27601 Industrial Blvd. Hayward, CA 94545 (510) 723-0280 By: Allan Henderson, President DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-7 R:~CIP~PROJECTS~PW01~:~w01.07~Contract.dot ATTACHMENT "A" PROJECT NO. PW01-07 SLURRY SEAL LIST FY2000-2001 PAGE 1 LOCATION SQ. FT. VIA EL GRECO - RANCHO VISTA RD. TO PASEO GOLETA 1,655X 37 61,235 280 X 33 9,240 CORTE CAMAR1LLO - VIA EL GRECO TO END OF STREET 110 X 20 2,200 11,440 260 X 33 8,580 CORTE SAN LEANDRO - VIA EL GRECO TO END OF STREET 130 X 25 3,250 11,830 560 X 33 18,480 CORTE MALLORCA - VIA EL GRECO TO END OF STREET 135 X 20 2,700 21,180 468 X 33 15,444 140 X 37 5,180 CORTE MADERA - VIA EL GRECO TO END OF STREET 90 X 11 990 21,614 575 X 33 18,975 150 X 20 3,000 CORTE PACI-[ECO - VIA EL GRECO TO END OF STREET 100 X 14 1,400 23,375 620 X 33 20,460 CORTE TUNAS - VIA EL GRECO TO END OF STREET 130 X t8 2,340 22,800 PASEO GOLETA - RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO RANCO VISTA ROAD 3,020 X 41 123,820 900 X 33 29,700 CORTE MONTIEL - PASEO GOLETA TO END OF STREET 150 X 40 6,000 35,700 1,225 X 33 40,425 CORTE PADRERA - PASEO GOLETA TO END OF STREET 200 X 20 4,000 44,425 1,156 X 33 38,148 CORTE POSITAS - PASEO GOLETA TO END OF STREET 160 X 37 5,920 44,068 550X 33 18,150 CORTE MONTECITO - PASEO GOLETA TO END OF STREET 165 X 25 4,125 22,275 CALLE SANTA ANA - RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO CORTE ROSARIO 138 X 32 4,416 1,080 X 33 35,640 CORTE ROSARIO - CALLE SANTA ANA EAST TO END OF STREET 146 X 28 4,088 39,728 TOTAL SQUARE FEET FOR PAGE ONE 487~906 EXHIBIT'A'- INSURANCE ENDORSEMENTS & CERTIFICATES A-1 R:~ID-DOCS~MASTERS~N EWBID PROJECT NO. PW01-07 SLURRY SEAL LIST FY2000-2001 PAGE TWO LOCATION SQ. FT. 220 X 33 7,260 CORTE ROSARIO - CALLE SANTA ANA WEST TO END OF STREET 140 X 26 3,640 10,900 1,005 X 37 37,185 CORTE SONORA - PASEO GOLETA TO END OF STREET 185 X 20 3,700 40,885 VIA LOMAS VISTA - CORTE SONORA TO PASEO DE LAS OLAS 410 X 37 15,170 270 X 37 9,990 PASEO DE LAS OLAS - VIA LOMAS VISTA TO END OF STREET 165 X 20 3,300 13,290 PASEO DE LAS OLAS-VIA LOMAS VISTA TO MEADOWS PARKWAY 2,680 X 37 99,160 CALLE TAJO - PASEO DE LAS OLAS TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. 255 X 41 10,455 1,210 X 37 44,770 CORTE SALINAS - PASEO DE LAS OLAS TO END OF STREET 175 X 24 4,200 48,970 670 X 37 24,790 CORTE TORTOSA ~ PASEO DE LAS OLAS TO END OF STREET 145 X 18 2,610 27,400 650 X 37 24,050 CORTE ENC1NAS - PASEO DE LAS OLAS TO END OF STREET 190 X 30 5,700 29,750 CAMINO ROMO - RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO CORTE VILLOSA 1,310 X 40 52,400 940 X 32 30,080 140 X 30 4,200 CORTE IVIENDOZA - CAMINO ROMO TO END OF STREET 120 X 12 1,440 35,720 1,385 X 40 55,400 CORTE VILLOSA - PAUBA ROAD TO END OF STREET 160 X 30 4,800 60,200 600 X 33 19,800 CORTE CASTRO - CORTE VILLOSA TO END OF STREET 140 X 25 3,500 23,300 650 X 33 21,450 145 X 25 3,625 VIA AZALEA - CORTE CASTRO TO END OF STREET 110 X 10 1,100 26,175 TOTAL SQUARE FEET FOR PAGE TWO 493~775 EXHIBIT "A' - INSURANCE ENDORSEMENTS & CERTIFICATES A-2 R:~ID-DOCS~IASTERS~NEWBID PROJECT NO. PW01-07 SLURRY SEAL LIST FY2000-2001 PAGE THREE LOCATION SQ. FT. VIA TORRES - PAUBA ROAD TO CORTE BACARRO 155 × 41 6,355 455 X 37 16,835 CORTE BACARRO - VIA TORRES TO END OF STREET 150 X 25 3,750 20,585 1,810 X 37 66,970 CORTE PARADO - VIA TORRES TO END OF STREET 160 X 22 3,520 70,490 880 X 37 32,560 CAMINO MERANO - CORTE PARADO TO END OF STREET 160 X 56 8,960 41,520 CAM1NO SENECO - CORTE PARADO TO VIA REINA !,200 X 37 44,400 VIA REINA - MEADOWS PARKWAY TO CORTE CARMELA 390 X 37 14,430 CORTE CARMELA - VIA REINA WEST TO END OF STREET 200 X 63 12,600 800 X 33 26,400 CORTE CARMELA - VIA REINA EAST TO END OF STREET 155 X 25 3,875 30,275 1,840 X 37 68,080 CAMINO NUNEZ - CORTE PARADO TO CORTE FLORECITA 135 X 50 6,750 74,830 CORTE FLORECITA - CAMINO NUNEZ WEST TO MEADOWS PKWY. 180 X 37 6,660 1,100 X 37 40,700 CORTE FLORECITA - CAMINO NUNEZ EAST TO END OF STREET 135 X 23 3,105 43,805 CAMINO DE LA TORRE - CORTE FLORECITA TO VIA VASQUEZ 900 X 37 33,300 CORTE VALENTINE - CAMINO DE LA TORRE NORTH TO END OF 725 X 33 23,925 STREET 200 X 20 4,000 27,925 935 X 33 30,855 CORTE ZAMORA - CAMINO NUNEZ TO END OF STREET 145 X 25 3,625 34,480 TOTAL SQUARE FEET FOR PAGE THREE 461,655 EXHIBIT 'A"- INSURANCE ENDORSEMENTS & CERTIFICATES A-3 R:',BID-DO CS~IAST E RS~N EWB ID PROJECT NO. PW01-07 SLURRY SEAL LIST FY2000-2001 PAGE FOUR LOCATION CAMINO CASANA - CAMINO NUNEZ TO CORTE LARA 1,450 X 37 53,650 545 X 33 17,985 CORTE LARA - CAMINO CASANA TO END OF STREET 140 X 26 3,640 21,625 775 X 33 25,575 CORTE PALACIO - CAMINO CASANA TO END OF STREET 136 X 20 2,720 28,295 VIA BALDERAMA - CAMINO CASANA TO RANCHO VISTA ROAD 705 X 37 26,085 VIA VASQLrEZ - CAMINO CASANA TO CORTE CANEL 850 X 37 31,450 300 X 33 9,900 CORTE CAMARA - VIA VASQUEZ TO END OF STREET 140 X 22 3,080 12,980 720 X 37 26,640 CORTE DE CERRO - VIA VISTANA EAST TO END OF STREET 150 X 24 3,600 30,240 605 X 37 22,385 CORTE CANEL - VIA VISTANA WEST TO END OF STREET 150 X 24 3,600 25,985 CORTE MONTIA - CORTE CANEL TO END OF STREET 140 X 66 9,240 VIA VISTANA - CORTE CANEL TO RANCHO VISTA ROAD 235 X 40 9,400 VIA JABILI - RANCHO VISTA TO CAMINO MAREA 136 X 41 5,576 CAMINO MAREA - VINTAGE HILLS DRIVE TO CORTE SEDA ! 2,760 X 37 102,120 330 X 37 12,210 CORTE SEDA - CAMINO MAREA TO END OF STREET 140 X 20 2,800 15,010 TOTAL SQUARE FEET FOR PAGE FOUR 371~656 EXHIBIT 'A'- INSURN~!CE ENDORSEMENTS & CERTIFICATES A-4 R:~BID-DOCS~IASTERS~N EWBID PROJECT NO. PW01-07 SLURRY SEAL LIST FY2000-2001 PAGE FIVE LOCATION SQ. FT. 635 X 37 23,495 CORTE PERGAMINO - CAMINO MAREA TO END OF STREET 125 X 15 1,875 25,370 CORTE BALBOA - CAMINO MAREA TO END OF STREET 140 X 71 9,940 VIA TORENO - RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO CAMINO MAREA 360 X 41 14,760 865 X 37 32,005 CORTE LA PUENTA - VIA TORENO TO END OF STREET 145 X 30 4,350 36,355 350 X 37 12,950 CORTE HIGUERA - CAMINO MAREA TO END OF STREET 175 X 32 5,600 18,550 VIA ASTURIAS - CAMINO MAREA TO CORTE SOLEDAD 280 X 37 10,360 210X 37 7,770 CORTE SOLEDAD - VIA ASTURIAS WEST TO END OF STREET 120 X 21 2,520 10,290 780 X 37 28,860 CORTE SOLEDAD - VIA ASTURIAS EAST TO END OF STREET 140 X 32 4,480 33,340 190 X 70 13,300 CORTE AMALIA - CORTE SOLEDAD TO END OF STREET 160 X 20 3,200 16,500 CALLE RESACA - VINTAGE HILLS DRIVE TO RANCHO VISTA ROAD 2,620 X 37 96,940 820 X 33 27,060 CORTE LAS CURCES - CALLE RESACA TO END OF STREET 145 X 20 2,900 29,960 720 X 33 23,760 CORTE SANTA CATALINA - CALLE RESACA TO END OF STREET 140 X 24 3,360 27,120 630 X 33 20,790 CORTE VICENTE - CALLE RESACA TO END OF STREET 160 X 24 3,840 24,630 TOTAL SQUARE FEET FOR PAGE FIVE 354A15 EXHIBIT"A' - INSURANCE ENDORSEMENTS & CERTIFICATES A-5 RSBID-DOCS~IASTERS~NEWBID PROJECT NO. PW01-07 SLURRY SEAL LIST FY2000-2001 PAGE SIX LOCATION SQ. FT. 825 X 32 26,400 CORTE CORONADO - CALLE RESACA TO END OF STREET 140 X 20 2,800 29,200 330X 33 10,890 CORTE CHATADA - CALLE RESACA TO END OF STREET 150 X 23 3,450 14,340 VINTAGE HILLS DRIVE - CALLE RESACA TO RANCHO CALIF. RD. 210 X 42 8,820 TOTAL SQUARE FEET FOR PAGE SIX 52~360 TOTAL SQUARE FEET ALL SIX PAGES 2~221,467 EXHIBIT"A"- INSURANCE ENDORSEMENTS & CERTIFICATES A-6 R:~BID-DOCS~IvlASTERS~NEWBID EXHIBIT 'A"- iNSURANCE ENDORSEMENTS & CERTIFICATES A-1 R:~BID-DOCS'tMASTER S~IEW BiD ITEM 22 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN~_~., CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Police Chief~ May 22, 2001 Loud Party Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 0'1- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.18 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING LIABILITY TO PERSONS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOUD OR UNRULY ASSEMBLIES WHICH CAUSE DISTURBANCES OF THE PEACE AND PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH ASSEMBLIES BACKGROUND: Each year, the police department responds to numerous complaints regarding disturbances, loud padies, assemblies, etc. California Penal Code sections 407, 408, 409, 415 and 416 define unlawful, loud and unruly assemblies and disturbances of the peace. In some cases, officers encounter large assemblies that are potentially troublesome during normal patrol. In either instance, officers often must take action to control the assembly. A significant amount of police officer time is spent responding to such calls, and frequently they require multiple officers to resolve. In 2000, the police department responded to more than 160 disturbance calls. Whenever a police officer responds to such an assembly, police shall hold the person responsible liable for the second and subsequent responses to the premises. Upon initial contact by police the responsible person is given a written warning that explains the ordinance and notifies them that any subsequent responses by police to control the assembly will constitute a special security assignment. Second and subsequent responses by police officers will result in fees being levied against the responsible person for personnel and equipment costs associated with the response. Currently, there is no means by which to recover costs associated with this type of enforcement action. This ordinance provides for recovery of costs for police officer time from those persons who are in control of such activities and fail to take appropriate action to maintain peace and order. It is anticipated that this ordinance will provide some deterrent value, which means that officers may not be required to make multiple responses to many future disturbance calls. This will result in officers being available to respond to more serious calls for service. FISCAL IMPACT: Revenues generated as a result of this ordinance are difficult to predict as there are no statistics available on which to base response estimates, Fees will be set by administrative order of the city manager but shall not exceed the cost of providing such service. ATTACHMENT: Ordinance No. 01- ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.18 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING LIABILITY TO PERSONS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOUD OR UNRULY ASSEMBLIES WHICH CAUSE DISTURBANCES OF THE PEACE AND PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH ASSEMBLIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 9.18, Loud and Unruly Assemblies, is hereby added to Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 9.18 "Loud and Unruly Assemblies "9.18.010 Notice of Personal Liability for Costs of Special Security Assignment a. Whenever a police officer responds to a loud or unruly assembly at any premises within the City and determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that the assembly constitutes a violation of Penal Code Sections 408, 409, 415 or 416, the Responsible Person shall be held personally liable for the costs of providing police personnel and services on the second and subsequent responses of the police to the premises, within twenty-four (24) hours of the first response, to control the assembly. "Responsible Person" shall mean: (1) The owner or owners of the premises; (2) the person or persons in charge of the premises; (3) the person or persons responsible for the assembly; or (4) the parents or guardians of any such person or persons described in (1), (2) or (3), if said person is a person under the age of 18. b. The Responsible Person shall be given a first warning, in the form of notification by a police officer on the scene that the initial police response shall be deemed to be the normal police services provided as described in subsection a. In the event the Responsible Person cannot be located at the time of the first response, the police officer shall post a written notice on the front door or primary entry door to the premises or upon the premises if no structure exists on it, that the initial police response shall be deemed to be the normal police services provided as described in subsection a, which shall constitute a first warning within the meaning of this section. c. The police personnel utilized after the first warning to control the assemblage shall be deemed to be on special security assignment over and above the normal services provided to the premises. "9.18.020 Fees and Costs for Special Security Assignments a. The costs of the special security assignment described in Section 9.18.010 shall include personnel and equipment costs expended during the second and any subsequent returns to the premises. Fees and costs shall be established by administrative order of the City Manager and shall not exceed the reasonable costs of providing such services. In addition, such costs may include the cost of repair or replacement of damaged property owned by the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside or the costs of injuries to personnel of the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside arising out of the second and subsequent returns to the premises. b. All fees and charges levied for the services described in Section 9.18,010 shall be due and payable upon presentation of a bill. c. All fees and charges for such services shall constitute a valid and existing debt in favor of the City and against the Responsible Person to whom such services were rendered, and an immediate cause of action shall accrue to the City for the collection thereof in any court of competent jurisdiction. The City shall have the right to assign said rights for the collection of such debt to the County of Riverside or to any other person. d. Collection pursuant to this Chapter is not intended to be the exclusive remedy available to the City relating to the circumstances which gave rise to the need for police response to the premises and City retains all available remedies, both criminal and civil, to deal with such circumstances. "9.18.030 Notice and Hearinq to Determine Reasonableness of Char,qes. a. The bill for services pursuant this Chapter shall be served upon the Responsible Person at the address of the premises or such other address as the Responsible Party has given to the police or the City. Said bill shall be deemed served upon the Responsible Person upon the earliest date of: (1) Personal service upon the Responsible Person; or (2) five (5) business days following deposit of the bill in United States Mail, addressed to the Responsible Person with first class postage prepaid. b. The Responsible Person charged pursuant to this Chapter shall have five (5) days after the date of service of the bill to file a written request with the Chief of Police for a hearing to determine the reasonableness of the charges. c. Upon receipt of such request, the Chief of Police or his or her designee shall give the Responsible Person not less than seven (7) days written notice of the time and place of the hearing to determine the reasonableness of the fees and charges. d. The hearing shall be conducted by the Chief of Police or his or her designated representative, who shall act as the Hearing Officer. The hearing shall be conducted within twenty-one (21) days following the filing of the request for hearing. The Hearing Officer shall consider all relevant evidence, including but not limited to applicable staff and police reports. The Hearing Officer shall give the Responsible Person, or his or her representative, and interested persons the opportunity to be heard in conjunction therewith. Based upon the evidence presented, the Hearing Officer shatt determine the reasonableness of the fees and charges imposed. The Hearing Officer Ords\01- 2 shall serve written notice of his or her decision to the Responsible Party by personal service of such decision or mailing such decision to the Responsible Person in accordance with the procedures for service set forth in subsection a. e. The decision of the Hearing Officer shall be final and conclusive in the absence of an appeal as provided in subsection f. f. The Responsible Person may appeal the decision of the Hearing Officer to the City Manager. The appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days following the date of service of the Hearing Officer's decision on the Responsible Party. The City Manager's review of the decision of the Hearing Officer shall be limited to the record of the hearing before the Hearing Officer. The City Manager shall afford the Responsible Party an opportunity to be heard on the issues, but no new evidence shall be introduced before the City Manager. Such opportunity to be heard before the City Manager shall be held within fifteen (15) days following the date the notice of appeal is received and the City Manager shall provide the Responsible Person not less than seven (7) days notice prior the hearing. The City Manger shall issue a written decision within five (5) days of the conclusion of the City Manager's hearing on the issues. g. The decision of the City Manager shall be final and conclusive and no further administrative appeals shall be allowed." Section 2. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 3. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2001. ATTEST: ,left Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] O~s~l- 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22ND day of May, 2001 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the of ,2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Ords\01~ 4 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER (v~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official~ May 24, 2001 Departmental Report April 2001 PREPARED BY: Carol Brockmeier, Administrative Secretary TOTAL NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED ................................................................... 234 NSFR ....... . ........................................................................................................ 112 NCOM ................................................................................................................... 7 TOTAL VALUATION ..................................................................................... $17,515,437 TOTAL NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS PERFORMED ............................................... 4563 Over the past several months the Building Department has been sending out Customer Service Surveys for permits that have been finaled. The response to that survey follows: There were fifty three (53) returned surveys. The results of the survey is overwhelmingly excellent with three negative comments. Those negative comments are reflected in (1) needs improvement in Inspection Services; (1) Plan Review, needs improvement and (1) needs improvement in Staff Assistance/General. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~/~ DIRECTOR OF FINAlqCE /~ CITY MANAGER I TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager May 22, 2001 Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of April 2001. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Leads & Inquiries In the month of Apdl, the City received 2 leads (restaurant and skateboard manufacturer) and 7 inquiries. In addition, letters and business kits were sent out to REI and Booing to consider Temecula as a possible site for a future relocation. In the month of Apdl, the Southwest Riverside County Alliance responded to 2 leads from the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) on behalf of the City of Temecula. The Alliance received 140 inquiries from the Westec Trade Show and 3 inquiries from Expansion Management Magazine. Attached is a copy of their activity report. The Alliance had a meeting with Cobra Wireless, a wireless DSL service provider in Los Angeles, on Apdl 3r~. They hope to be relocating to Southwest Riverside County in the near future. 22 calls and/or attempts were made to follow-up on recent and past leads. Groundbreakin;i Ceremony On April 26t', Mayor Comerchero and staff attended the Chamber of Commerce Groundbreaking Ceremony for their new facility on Ynez Road. The pmgrem included messages from Mayor Comerchero and Chamber Chairman of the Board Tomi Arbogast. Media/Outreach Materials Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter titled "New Religious Institution Handbook." Establishing a worship center can be an enormous task for any congregation, so the City of Temecula Community Development Department developed this guidebook to provide a concise package of information describing the development and permit processes. Copies of this handbook have been distributed to all existing churches in the City. Staff wrote an article for the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County quarterly newsletter. The article tiffed "remecula...Where the Future Lives," provided highlights of the Mayor's State of the City Address, which included capital improvement projects, city finances, economic development activities, and future projects. On April 10th, staff met with Rhodes Design to finalize the proof for the Temecula Demographics Quick Facts Brochure. The brochure will be completed by the end of May. Meetings On Apdl 3rd, staff attended a meeting to make the final arrangements for the Southwest Riverside County Career & Manufacturing Expo, which took place Chaparral High School on April 21~. The City of Temecula was a sponsor and participated as an exhibitor. The Expo was extremely successful as it attracted approximately 1000 - 1500 people. Seminars and resume critiquing was also a part of the Expo. There were 285 surveys completed by attendees and the exhibitors filled out surveys critiquing the event. The local businesses that exhibited were extremely pleased with how the Expo was mn and the attendance it drew. They indicated that it far exceeded their expectations. Laser Power Corporation reported that they hired 2 individuals at the job fair. Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Meeting on Apdl 4th. Topics discussed included a leads/inquiries report, status of the CD Rom project, budget review and update on the Alliance marketing program. Staff met with Debra Albamonte, Marketing Director for the Temecula Valley Days Inn, regarding their upcoming grand re-opening, which is scheduled for May 17th and co-op opportunities with the City on future FAM tours, CEO visits, etc. Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Business Relations Committee Meeting on April 5th. Follow-up action reports were given on the following companies: Waterstone, Theraquip, Inc., Prime EDM and North Star Tool, Inc. Company contact reports were given on Adex Medical, Driveline Specialties and Machine, and Next Generation Company. On April 5th, staff met with Lamj Markham regarding fees on the Temecula Creek Inn expansion. Staff attended the Murrieta/Temecula Group on April 6th. The Economic Development Sub-committee members and staff met on April 9th with the City Marketing Partners regarding their funding requests for FY2001-O2. Recommendation of the Sub-committee will be reflected in the overall budget recommendation. Staff attended the Temecula CONNECT Meeting on April 6th. Scott Gradert, Director of Business Development, for ProSoft Corporation was the guest speaker. Announcements were given on the upcoming Director's Luncheon on June 8~ and the 7th Annual EDCSWRC Goff Tournament on June 11th, both to be held at Temecula Creak Inn. Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County's Board of Directors Meeting on April 19~h. Rex Oliver, CEO/President of the Murrieta Chamber was appointed to the EDC Board of Directors. The Board camed to ratify Resolution #2001-04 (not support the RClP Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan affecting the City of Lake Elsinore. The Board reviewed the Slate of Nominees submitted by the Nominating Committee. Updates were given on the Manufacturers' Career Fair, EDC Golf Tournament and City, County and Chamber activities. Staff met with Craig Ballard at Temeku Hills Golf Club on Apdl 19th to go over the City's marketing/promotional program with him. Temeku Hills is eager to partner with the City and Chamber on future economic development and tourism opportunities. Staff had a lunch meeting with Doug Lieber, the new General Manager for Temecula Creek Inn, on April 23~ to talk about the City's marketing program and partnerships. Temecula Creek Inn is pleased to support the City in promoting growth opportunities for business development and toudsm. On Apdl 26th, staff attended the Inland Empire Economic Partnership Community Partners Meeting. Discussion took place on the Formal Goals Statement for Technology Infrastructura. Other business items included a recap of the leads, a report on the Inland Empire High Technology Program and Inland Empire Tourism Council activities. Staff and several Councilmembers attended the Catifomia Association for Local Economic Development (CALED) Annual Economic Development Conference in Monterey on April 10th - 13th. CALED is the premier statewide professional economic development membership organization dedicated to advancing its members' ability to achieve excellence in delivering economic development services to their communities and business clients. Programs on energy, the economy, economic development practices, effective presentations as well as informal discussion sessions were attended. TOURISM Media/Outreach Materials The Temecula Valley Museum and Tony Tobin have been in contact with Huell Howser's Califomia Gold producers and they will be arriving in Temecula on May 8th to film a television segment on the Gardner Ranch owned by Earle Stanley Gardner and the Giant Oak (oldest living oak tree). Pechanga pumhased the ranch and they plan to build their cultural center there, and expand their RV Park. Staff prepared a large gift basket for Mr. Howser filled with Temecula souvenirs, wine, history book, etc. and also provided a tourism press kit. A revised Tourism CD Rem RFP was sent out to businesses to provide film footage. The City was not granted permission to use the video footage from the Eye on LA segment that was filmed in Temecula last year. The Chamber and City will review the proposals mid April. On April 6th, staff provided The San Bernardino Sun with additional information on the Old Town Western Days event to publish in their newspaper's calendar/entertainment section. Familiarization Tours/Media Day Staff worked closely with Sue McClure of San Diego This Week, Thornton Winery, the Chamber, various tourism groups and Old Town restaurants on setting up a FAM Tour for 65 concierges from the San Diego and Orange County Concierge Associations (high-end hotel properties). This was the first time both associations were brought together to learn about another tourism destination other than their own to market. This successful event was held on April 2"~. A follow-up meeting is scheduled for May 10a to discuss the event and how we can create and promote Temecula as a tourism destination for San Diego and Orange County visitors. We want to capitalize on the interest and momentum generated by the concierge's interest in Temecula. On April 17th, staff attended the Chamber FAM Tour Planning Meeting to discuss the upcoming FAM tour scheduled for Fall, which will target travel wdters. The FAM tour will fie in with the grand-opening festivities planned for the Temecula Creek Inn expansion on October 20th. Staff attended the Frontier Days Rodeo Media Event on April 12th at DLR Ranch. The Temecula Fmnber Days PRCA Rodeo is scheduled for May 26a & 27th at the Temecula Showgrounds. For the past several years the Maintenance Superintendents Association (MSA) has held their Secretaries Day Luncheon in Temecula. Approximately 85 people attended this year's event, which was held on Apdl 27~h at Thornton Winery. The MSA organization was founded in 1966 and is made up of professionals from the general fields of public works, services, maintenance, and operations. All cities in the Inland Empire/Desert area are members. Being able to host such events as this allows Temecula the opportunity to market itself to individuals within our same region. Staff made arrangements for the luncheon and donations. Me;Rings On April 3fa, a Post Rod Run 2001 meeting was held with the city departments and the Temecula Town Association to discuss the 2001 event and to get suggestions on ways to improve the 2002 event. As a result of the meeting, the police department will provide alternative locations in Old Town for the cars to exhibit. It was decided that a meeting with all of the city departments and the 'I-I'A will be held in August to start planning for the February Rod Run. Staff met with Cindy Capin of Glen Ivy Hot Springs Spa on Apdl 11th to discuss possible co-op tourism opportunities and the distribution of the Temecula toudsm brochure at the spa. On April 4th, City and Chamber staff met with Sheri Davis of the Inland Empire Film Commission and Jennifer Nutter, Riverside County Cultural Hedtage Representative, to discuss a large group of film/photography professionals that will be attending a photography/film conference in Temecula in August. Owners of the Clickers & Flickers Photo Network in Pasadena, CA attended the Inland Empire Tourism Council/Temecula Fam Tour last September. ATTACHMENTS Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Activities Report Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Activities Report Inland Empire Economic Partnership Activities Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report - Was not submitted 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 May 11,2001 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of April at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights: In the month of April, 13 businesses reqdested information on sta~dng or relocating their business in Temecula. They received a business packet, which includes a copy of the City of Temecula demographic, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc. Committee Highlights: Tourism & Visitors Council: The City of Temecula and Tourism & Visitors Council have been busy coordinating a tourism booth for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival on June 9 & 10, 2001. Volunteers will be distributing Temecula tourism brochures and community events information to festival attendees. Education Committee: The committee is looking forward to the Temecula Valley Youth Job Fair on May 19, 2001, from 10:00 a.m. -- 2:00 p.m. at The Promenade in Teme~zu!a. The job fair is sponsored by the Workforce Development Center's Hire-A-Youth Program, The Promenade in Temecula, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. 45 employers have sigmed tip to participate with over 700 job positions available. The committee has recently judged scholarship applications and will be presenting students from the local high schools with scholarship awards. Ways & Means Committee: The 10~h Annual Chamrock Golf Classic was held on May at Temecula Creek Inn. This successful event hosted 208 golfers who enjoyed fun in the sun lbr the day. Schedule June 14, 2001 at 7:30 am on your calendars, John E. Husing ~vill be the featured speaker at the "Talk of the Town" Economic Realities for the Temecula Valley." · Local Basiness Promotions Committee: Currently 79 businesses have committed to both thc June and the November Shop Temecula First campaign. The committee is working on the Success Seminar Series. Business of the month for June is Eastern Municipal Water District and Temecula Valley Insurance. The Mystery Shopper for June is Pro-Craft and the Chamber Spotlight business is Chrirospa. Government Action Committee: The Government Action Committee and TVCC Board sent letters of support for the following bills: Support AB 1007 (Pacheco), AB 1137 (Hollingsworth) conceming Property Tax Issue - A number of taxing entities in Riverside County have suffered longtime losses of revenue because of misallocation of property taxes by the Auditor-Controller's Office. These errors existed for more than a decade and the county has acknowledged this error. Losses for Murrieta total 5.6 million and $650,000 for Temecula. The Chamber also sent letters of support for SB 688 (O'Connell) - Would require Regional Occupahonal Centers and Programs to institute accountability systems by aligning their curriculum with state standards, and would provide funding to implement the new standards and meet the changing workforce demands of the business sector. GAC and Board OPPOSED SB 350 (Alpert) - Specifically targets Metropolitan and would require the distriqt to automatically refund reserves considered in excess of what is needed for ongoing expenses, capital projects and a normal reserve. Membership Committee: Chamber staffand Ambassadors attended 10 Ribbon Cuttings in the month of April A very successful Mixer was held at Thornton Winery on April 18, 2001 with over 250 guests in attendance. The membership committee is implementing a new membership drive program. "Membership is Everybody's business" a year long drive with special incentives in the months of May and September. April 25, 2001, 80 business owners attended the Ambassador Networking Breakfast. On May 23, 2001 there will be a Special Topic Breakfast regarding the Energy Crisis at 7:30 a.m. at Embassy Suites Hotel. Guest speakers: Mayor Jeff Comerehero - City of Temecula, Bob Lopez - SCE, Jacqueline Howells - SDGE, A1 Sabsevitz - Verizon, Perry Louck - Rancho Water District and Andrea DeLeon representing Assemblyman Hollingworth office. A survey was sent out to the entire membership. Over 100 surveys were returned with comments and concerns. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) · 1500 Temccula Brochures to Sunrise Rotary 14~ Annual Run Through The Vineyards 2001 participants. · 250 Temecula Brochures, 250 Visitor Guides, 250 Winery Brochures and 25 Inland Empire Regional Visitors Guides to Pechanga Entertainment Center for distribution to visitors. 225 Visitor Guides to Silver Spoon Caf6 for distribution to clients. · 225 Visitor Guides to Pala Mesa Resort for distribution to guests. 200 Temecula Brochures to Callaway Vineyard & Winery for distribution to clients. · 200 Winery Brochures and 100 Visitor Guides to Embassy Suites for disthbution to guests. · 200 Winery Brochures to Temecula Valley Balloons for distribution to clients. · 100 Winery Brochures to Pasco dcl Sol for distribution to clients. · 100 Winery Brochures and 75 Visitor Guides to Outdoor Resorts for distribution to guests. · 50 Temecula Brochures, 50 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to Romoland School District for distribution at a teacher recruitment event. · 50 Relocation Packets to the Temecula Valley Unified School District for distribution at a teacher's conference in Monterey. ,, 30 Visitor Guides and 30 Winery Brochures to Guidant for distribution to employees. 25 Tcmccula Brochures, 25 Winer7 Brochures and 25 Balloon & Wine Festival flyers to Thc Colony at Fashion Island for distribution at their facility. 25 Visitor Guides to World Harvest Church to be included in pastors conference packagcs~ · 10 Visitor Guides to Tarbell Realtors for distribution to clients. Marketing Highlights: · In response to the Temecula ad placed in the 2001 San Diego North Travel Planning and Conference Guide, 19 inquiries were requested and filled in April. Activity Report: · Total Tourism calls were 1,724 in April. · Total Phone calls were 3,527 in April. · Total Walk-ins were 2,893 in April. · Total Mailings were 269 in April. · E-mail requests were up 14.20 percent in April. Also attached are the meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways & Means, Membership, Marketing Committee, Local Business Promotions, Government Action and a May edition of the Temecula Today! Newsletter. Sincerely, President/CEO Cc: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roberts Councilman JeffStone Councilman Sam Pratt Councilman Mike Naggar Shawn Nelson, City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS * CHAMBER REFERRALS TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR APRIL, 2001 Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month 356 157 199 1,012 1,724 198 57 1,354 194 3,527 N/A Total Year-To-Date 1,380 736 1,113 4,353 7,582 830 283 5,430 739 14,864 N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 234 121 1,563 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 158 28 675 SPECIAL EVENTS 63 7 391 GENERAL INFORMATION 884 83 4,542 RELOCATION 234 5 939 DEMOGRAPHICS 70 0 325 CHAMBER 863 1 3,528 MISCELLANEOUS 139' 3 692 TOTAL WALK-INS 2,645 248 12,655 121 79 69 269 43 20 122 185 N/A THIS MONTH 3,527 2,893 269 185 MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL 532 456 349 1,337 186 155 439 -78O N/A YEAR-TO-DATE 14,864 12,655 1,337 78O CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber Chamber April, 2000 April, 2001 Percentage Increase PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 437 356 -18.54 Calendar of Events 187 157 -16.04 Special Events 423 199 -52.96 General Information 1,107 1,012 -8.58 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,154 1,724 -19.96 RELOCATION 119 198 66.39 DEMOGRAPHICS 89 57 -35.96 CHAMBER 1,685 1,354 -19.64 MISCELLANEOUS 200 194 -3.00 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 4,247 3,527 -16.95 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 175 234 33.71 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 152 158 3.95 SPECIAL EVENTS 85 63 -25.88 GENERAL INFORMATION 890 884 -0.67 RELOCATION 173 234 35.26 DEMOGRAPHICS 139 70 -49.64 CHAMBER 831 863 3.85 MISCELLANEOUS 134 139 3.73 VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 545 248 -54.50 TOTAL WALK-INS 3,124 2,893 -7.39 MAILINGS TOURISM 132 121 -8.33 RELOCATION 88 79 -10.23 DEMOGRAPHICS 85 69 -18.82 TOTAL MAILINGS 305 269 -11.80 E-MAIL TOURISM 44 43 -2.27 RELOCATION 31 20 -35.48 MISCELLANEOUS 87 122 40.23 TOTAL E-MAIL 162 185 14.20 * Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls May 7, 2001 Jim O'Grady City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RE: Activity Summary- April 2001 Activities of the EDC for the month of April were as follows: Business Development Staff received the following seven business development leads for the month of April: A referral from EDC Director Dick Kurtz to contact Interventional Technologies of Murrieta and inquire on their tentative expansion plans. The company was recently purchased by Boston Scientific, a very large bio- med firm and competitor of Guidant Corporation. Staff called on Kathey Houghtaling to offer assistance with expansion plans and sent a business assistance information packet. · Staff assisted McCall's Country canning with staffing needs for their newly relocated business. McCall's manufactures fragrant candle products and relocated to Mumeta from Missouri. Seven resumes obtained from the Workforce Development Center's Resource Center were forwarded to Dee McCall for hiring purposes. To date, four employees were hired as a result of EDC's workforce assistance. · An in-person visit with Eric Runkle of Performance Resource Group, an integrated training solutions agency. Mr. Runlde requested general information of manufacturing businesses and suggested a partnership with the EDC for possible grant-seeking opportunities. Possible grant funds would be used for a variety of technical and sot~-skill traimmg in the region's manufacturing/commercial/industrial sectors. · Staff regularly provides copies of the City of Temecula's Planning Department meeting agendas to member construction companies for business development. · A phone inquiry from Jim Martinelli, general manager of Laser Power Corporation in Mumeta, to provide wage, cost of living and quality of life comparisons between the local region and Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego Counties. A broad packet of information that included wage data sorted by county and Service Industry Codes was forwarded to Mr. Martinelli. · An in-person visit with James Bell who was referred by Aaron Adams, City of Temecula. Mr. Bellqs working on his thesis in regards to the energy crisis and requested feedback and information on how local companies would be affected with rolling blackouts. Staff provided regional demographic reports, news articles on the Rainbow Interconnect Project, the hydroelectric plant proposed to be built in Lake Elsinore and other utility matters, and contacts to other reliable sources of information. Mr. Bell will share his final analysis with the EDC. · A referral from Gloria Wolnick, City of Temecula, to assist a business owner in Redondo Beach, CA with regional demographic information. Staff contacted Jeff Jacobson who owns a roofing business in Redondo Beach, and is looking to relocate to Southwest Riverside County. Staff sent Mr. Jacobson a detmled information packet specific to his inquiries regarding housing, business license information, labor force, competitor roofing companies, etc. Post Office Box 1388 · 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Suite #101 · Temecula, CA 92593-1388 Office 909/600-6064 ° FAX 909/60045005 · Email info@edc-swrc.org ° www. edc-swrc.org Jim O'Grady City of Temecula Activity Summary- April 2001 Page 2 of 3 Marketing Outreach Staff attended the following meetings/events: · April 3, 2001 - Murrieta Town Square Groundbreaking Event - Staff attended the special celebration of the Murrieta Town Square groundbreaking. · April 6, 2001 - Murrieta Temecula Group - Staff attended the regularly scheduled monthly meeting at Bailey's Winery in Tcmecula. Topics included the Riverside County Integrated Project as it related to transportation, habitat conservation and housing. · April 6, 2001 - Totally Themed Reception - Staff attended a special showcase of Totally Themed's full-scale theme park attraction and thematic arts capabilities. Totally Themed specializes in custom design and fabrication services for themed environments, such as theme parks, hotels, family entertainment centers, resort destinations, etc. A special showing was provided to many executives from various Southern California hospitality industries including Disney. · April 9, 2001 - SBA's 7(a) Loan Program Outreach - Requested by EDC President Gary Yonmans, staff facilitated an email outreach in regards to proposed legislation that would severely impact business lending in Southwest Riverside County. · April 12, 2001- Muscular Dystrophy Association Lock-Up Fundraiser - Staff represented EDC in the annual MDA Lock-Up fundraiser at the Temecula Brewery in Temecula. Staff's goal to raise $1,000 "bail" was successfully met. · April 16, 2001 - SWRC Economic Alliance Marketing CD-ROM Project - EDC President Gary Youmans participated in the Alliance's CD-ROM project by providing a live video testimonial that was shot outside the Workforce Development Center. · April 18, 2001 - Business Technology Expo, Ontario Convention Center - Staff attended the technology expo and luncheon as a guest of City of Lake Elsinore. Keynote speakers included John Husing and former Secretary of Energy, Bill Richardson. Topics included an economic forecast and energy crisis strategies for the Inland Empire. · April 21, 2001 - SWRC Career & Manufacturers' Expo - Staff represented the EDC at the day-long career fair at Chaparral High School in Temecula. The event was very successful and saw approximately 1,500 attendees. Official statistics to be provided after the wrap-up meeting on May 8. · April 26, 2001 - EDC Quarterly Luncheon - "Corporate Recruiting and Labor Law Update" was presented by keynote speakers Kelley Russell, branch manager of Diversified the Staffing Solution; Nonme McClain, technical recruiter of Guidant Corporation; and Jack O'Doanell, attorney/partner of O'Donnell & Harrison. Business Relations · April 5, 2001 - Staff attended the EDC Business Relations Committee Meeting. details.) (See meeting minutes for Administration/Organization · April 3, 2001 - SWRC Career & Manufacturers' Expo Meeting - Stuff attended a planning meeting with the Career Expo Committee to discuss details of the Southwest Riverside County Career & Manufacturers' Expo held on April 21, 2001 at Chaparral High School in Temecula. · April 9, 2001 - Meeting with the City of Temecula's Budget Subcommittee - EDC President Gary Yonmans and staff attending the subcommittee meeting to discuss EDC activities and funding for FY 2001-02. · April 19, 2001 - EDC Board of Directors Meeting held in the Workforee Development Center in Temecula. (See meeting minutes for details.) Jim O'Grady City of Temecula Activity Summary - April 2001 Page 3 of 3 Administration - During the month of April, staff managed the daily operations of the EDC office, coordinated details for the quarterly luncheon held on April 26, coordinated details for the Career & Manufacturers' Expo held on April 21, called on potential golf tournament sponsors and mailed out donation letters to 100 restaurants in the region, and met with seven job seekers from the Career Fair to assist with job placement in local businesses. This concludes the activity summary for April 2001. Should you have questions or need further detail, please call me at 600-6064. Sincerely, EDC of Southwest Riverside County ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MEETING Thursday, April 19, 2001 - 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA BOARD MEMBERS EDC STAFF MEMBERS AND GUESTS Ted Hating, Eastern Municipal Water District Dick Kurtz, CDM Group, Inc. Phil Oberhansley, Cannon Parks & Oberhansley Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council Al Sabsevitz, Vetizon Diane Sessions Robert Ryan, Keeton Construction CALL TO ORDER · Board Secretary Phil Oberhansley called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. Mr. Oberhansley noted that Gary Youmans could not be present as he was in Washington DC. MINUTES · The Board reviewed the minutes ofth~ March 22, 2001 Board of Directors Meeting. Motion was made by Ted Hating, seconded by Dick Kurtz and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the March 22, 2001 Board of Directors Meeting as presented. FINANCIAL REPORT · The Board reviewed the March 31, 2001 Financial Report that showed total monthly income of $3,953, total expenses of $8,202, and total cash-in-bank of $73,356. Diane Sessions reported unfavorable variances year- to-date in Total Revenues of $14,532 and favorable variances year-to-date in Total Expenses of $23,017. Motion was made by Dick Kurtz, seconded by David Rosenthal and carried unanimously to approve the March 31, 2001 Financial Report as presented. NEW BUSINESSS · Ratify Resolution #2001-02 - Not Support the Proposed Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan Affecting the City of Lake Elsinore: The Board reviewed Resolution #2001-04 that was adopted on March 22, 2001. The Board suggested the resolution be sent to local, state and federal legislatures. Motion was made by Dick Kurtz, seconded by Ted Hating and carried to ratify Resolution #2001-04 as presented. Jim O'Grady abstained. · Appoint Director-At-Large to Fill Vacant Seat: The Board reviewed the letter from Rex Oliver, CEO/President of Murdeta Chamber of Commerce, that expressed his interest in filling the vacant director seat until the term expiration in June 2002. In Gary Youmans' absence, Diane Sessions reported that Mr. Youmans favored the appointment. David Rosenthal noted he would favor the appointment so long as it was not made for political reasons and that Mr. Oliver would be an active director. The Board expressed their favor that Mr. Oliver would be a positive addition to the Board. Motion was made by Al Sabsevitz, seconded by Jim O'Grady and carded unanimously to appoint Rex Oliver as Director-at-Large to serve the remaining term until June 2002. Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting - April 19, 2001 Minutes - Page 2 of 3 · Nominating Committee Report: The Board reviewed the Slate of Nominees submitted by the Nominating Committee. Diane Sessions reported that Michelle Steele of Foothill Independent Bank recently accepted her nomination, although her name did not appear on the slate. The Board noted her acceptance and favored her name to be included on the official ballot. Ms. Sessions further reported that solicitation letters for self nominations were mailed to the general membership on April 16, and nominations would close on May 17. · David Rosenthal suggested the Board should present Kathleen Newton, former board member, with a gift for her long-standing participation with the EDC. The Board agreed and requested Diane Sessions to follow up. · Jim O'Grady reported that he spoke with Bob Lopez of Southern California Edison about a nomination to renew his director's term. Mr. Lopez was opened to the nomination, although Edison was not pursuing economic development membership due to the company's uncertain budget. The Board discussed the bylaws for election of a director and agreed the nomination could be given only to a paid member. The Board further discussed an honorary membership for Mr. Lopez that would exclude voting privileges. Discussion was tabled until the May 2001 board meeting to further research the bylaws. CONTINUING BUSINESS Murrieta Chamber Proposal to Request County Redistricting: Ron Holliday was not present to provide an update. Discussion was tabled until the May 2001 board meeting. · Manufacturers' Career Fair Update: David Rosenthal reported plans were moving forward for the Career Fair and 28 companies would participate. · Golf Tournament Update: Diane Sessions reported all major sponsors and most hole sponsors were secured, and there were 15 foursomes registered to date. Ms. Sessions asked members to donate goody bag items and raffled prizes. OPEN DISCUSSION · EDC Administrative Update: The Board reviewed the March 2001 EDC Monthly Activity Report submitted by Diane Sessions. Ms. Sessions reported she participated in the Muscular Dystrophy Association Lock Up fundraiser and thanked those who made donations. · City, County and Chamber Updates: City of Temecula - Jim O'Grady reported the City was represented at a recent CALED conference that discussed the energy crisis and what various cities are planning overall; Diane Sessions and Gary Youmans met with the City's Economic Development Subcommittee, who would recommend EDC funding of $20,000 to the City Council for FY 2001-02; work was in progress for the crossing at Via Montezuma and Diaz Road, which should be completed within several months; the First Avenue bridge project was in the completion stage; the City's newsletter would regularly include traffic- related articles; Outback Steakhouse restaurant was in the building phase; mall expansion plans would focus on new stores fitted toward adults; a GPS study would be conducted for emergency services and the City would consider using emergency-related software from Plant Equipment, Inc.; using state grant funds, the City would begin to replace signal bulbs at key intersections with more energy-efficient bulbs. SDG&E filed their preferred route with the PUC for the Rainbow Interconnect project. The City was concerned with SDG&E's preferred route since it would mn through the heart of Wine Country and Wolf Creek, but no Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting - April 19, 2001 Minutes - Page 3 of 3 formal position had been taken. The Council may considered further discussion at the next City Council meeting to file a protest by outlining concerns and to state their position on record. City of Lake Elsinore - No report available. City of Murrieta - No report available. County of Riverside EDA - No report available. SWRC Economic Alliance -No report available. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - Phil Oberhansley reported plans for the Chamber's golf tournament was going well and would be held on May 4; the official groundbreaking for the new site was on April 26 at 4:00 p.m.; and the Chamber would launch a pro-business campaign throughout the year to educate the community on the positive economic benefits of business development. SWRC Manufacturers' Council - David Rosenthal reported the Council would be present at the Career Fair on April 21; Mr. Rosenthal thanked the City of Temecula for writing a letter to legislative representatives in regards to power rate increases; the Council would collaborate with the Corona Manufacturers' Council on similar interests; and the next luncheon would be held on May 18 at the Hungry Hunter restaurant. EDC Business Relations Committee Update - Jim O'Grady reported that visitation goals to local businesses were slightly behind, but would be met by fiscal year end. ADJOURNMENT · At 10:00 a.m, motion was made A1 Sabsevitz, seconded by Dick Kurtz and carried unanimously to adjourn the board meeting. Respectively submitted by: Diane Sessions Phil Oberhansley Recording Secretary Board Secretary ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, April 5, 2001 - 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA Committee Members Present: Marlene Best, City of Lake Elsinore Dennis Frank, UCR Lisa Garcia-Gleissner, Riverside County EDA Keith Johnson, Missions Oaks National Bank Dick Kurtz, CDM Group, Inc. Michael Lewin, Mirau, Edwards, Cannon, Hatter & Lewin Para Migliozzi, Dawn Human Resources Loti Moss, City of Murrieta Mark O'Connor, Lee & Associates Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council Diane Sessions, EDC Staff Gary_ Youmans, Community National Bank Also In Attendance: Ann Burgner, AFLAC Ted Hating, EMWD Rex Oliver, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce Tracy Picquelle, Manpower Temporary Services Call To Order · Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:06 a.m. Welcome · Michael Lewin welcomed guests Ann Burgner of AFLAC, Rex Oliver of Murrieta Chamber of Commerce, and Tracy Picquelle of Manpower Temporary Services, and thanked all for attending. Follow-up Action Reports · Waterstone - At the February 2001 meeting, Mark O'Connor reported details of a visit and indicated the business owner's desire market the company. Diane Sessions reported she would provide several local marketing firms to Lori Moss for follow up. · Theraquip, Inc./Hessco - At last month's meeting, Gary Youmans reported a phone interview with owner Doug Schultz, who indicated a need for qualified service technicians. Tracy Picquelle to follow up with employment needs. · Prime EDM - At the December 2000 meeting, Alice Sullivan reported the owner was looking to occupy 1,500 sq. ft. of office space. Mark O'Connor and Dick Kurtz to follow up. · North Star Tool, Inc. - At the December 2000 meeting, Alice Sullivan reported the owner was looking expand their existing building on Winchester and required approval for occupancy. Ms. Sullivan referred the owner to the Knute Noland, City of Temecula Planning Department. Jim O'Grady to follow up with the results of the expansion. Apex Manufacturing - Owner's major concern was lack of local affordable housing for employees. It was suggested that Jim O'Grady provide information on the city's First Time Home Buyer's Program. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - April 5, 2001 Page 2 of 4 Company Contact Reports · Opto 22 - Jim O'Grady reported he had not yet secured a meeting date and would continue to try. · ADEX Medical - Gary Youmans reported he had a visit scheduled for May 7, 2001 and would make a report in June. He reported a brief phone conversation with the owner who provided several details of the business. The company is a small wholesale firm that manufactures medical supplies and surgical gloves. · Driveline Specialties and Machine - Pam Migliozzi reported she was in process of setting a meeting date with owner Alfred Noffsinger. · Next Generation - Pam Migliozzi was working on a scheduled meeting with the owner. · JK Industries - Dick Kurtz reported a phone interview with owner Jim Kevany. The company is a specialty machine shop and self-ranked as small. In operation for 15 years in Temecula, the company relocated from Orange County due to the local economy. Mr. Kevany employs one part-time and two full-time employees. Primary competitors are in surrounding counties. Primary suppliers are steel and aluminum fabricators in Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange County. Mr. Kevany indicated he was happy doing business in Temecula and had no issues that required assistance. · CNC Machine - Gary Youmans reported an impromptu interview with the owner of CNC Machine, who is his customer. The owner is presently doing well and may consider future expansion. No survey was completed. · McCall's Country Canning - Lori Moss reported the owners now occupied their new location. She would schedule a visit later in the year. · Michael Lewin provided a brief explanation on the Business Relations Committee and its goals and objectives to first-time attendees. Goal Proeress Rel~ort Michael Lewin announced that visits and phone interviews in the ninth month of the fiscal year were slightly behind as follows: YTD VISIT PHONE Actual 16 17 Goal 20 27 Annual Goal: 27 visits ~ 3 points each + 33 phone interviews ~ 1 points each = 60 visits/calls ~114 points YTD VISIT PHONE POINTS Actual 16 17 65 Goal 27 33 114 Variance - 11 - 16 -49 Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes- April 5, 2001 Page 3 of 4 New Committee Assignments · Point persons assigned for April 2001 were Michael Lewin/Robert Ryan - blue binder #1, Alice Sullivan - blue binder #5, Dennis Frank - green binder #2, and Keith Johnson - green binder #3. Lisa Garcia-Gleissner returned blue binder ~4, Dick Kurtz retained blue binder #4, and Bonnie Hanna returned green binder #4. · Strategic Visits - Tsunami Products - Ms. Sullivan; Osorno Corporation - Mr. Lewin; and Laser Power Corp. - Mr. Johnson. EDC News and Other Information * EI)C Board Update - Gary Youmans reported he and Diane Sessions would meet with the City of Temecula Budget Subcommittee on April 9 to discuss FY 2001-02 funding; most major sponsorship commitments were secured for the golf tournament; and a new EDC membership campaign would commence soon. He further reported that proposed federal legislation could severely impact regional businesses via changes is the current U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA) 7A Loan Program. He asked the Committee to access the SBA's interactive website and vote against the proposed changes. Diane Sessions to email the website to EDC members. Mr. Youmans thanked Jim O'Grady for the letter of support on behalf of his nomination as SBA's Financial Services Advocate of the Year. He further announced he received the national award and would travel to Washington DC for the ceremony. Diane Sessions announced she would participate in the Muscular Dystrophy Association Lock Up campaign on April 12; and the EDC quarterly luncheon was scheduled for April 26 at Bear Creek Golf Club in Murrieta, which would discuss corporate recruiting. · City, County & Chamber Updates - City ofMurrieta - Lori Moss reported the City was very busy with setting the FY 2001-02 budget; completion of Murrieta Hot Springs Road was delayed due to rain; organization was in process for annexation in some of the City's westside area; Verizon would present a DLS update on April 17 at Murrieta Council Chambers; a brokers' meeting was scheduled for April 26 at 8:30 and would discuss the RCIP's Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan; the widening of the Jefferson corridor was delayed due to right-of-way issues with property owners; and a new fire chief was hired. City of Lake Elsinore - Marlene Best reported the City's focus lately was on lake and stadium issues. Education on the lake and water level was ongoing and was available on the City's website; the Padres' game was well attended and they have indicated a desire to be involved with the Storm Stadium; a local radio station would carry the Padres' games; the City has a new fire chief, Steve Gallego; Mission Trail improvements were rapidly moving forward; the Lake Elsinore Valley Connections EDC lunch was scheduled for April 2 at 11:30 and would discuss small business loans and lending practices by the Small Business Development Corp. (SBDC); Enron had recently backed out of the proposed MWD hydroelectric plant, although the project was not canceled; the lake's season opener was this coming weekend; and the Totally Themed reception was planned for April 6 in Lake Elsinore and would showcase very impressive theme park decor to Disney and other theme park executives. City ofTemecula - Jim O'Grady thanked David Rosenthal and the SWRC Manufacturers' Council for his presentation at a recent City Council meeting regarding power Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - April 5, 2001 Page 4 of 4 issues; the Saturn dealership was in plan check and would be located next to Carriage Motors on Ynez; the Planning Department approved a 13,000 sq. ft. medical office complex on Margarita; the plan check process for fire department issues was streamlined to include a link on the City website; tourism was a focus for the City's economic development efforts, which included a tour of the City by 65 concierges from San Diego County and Orange County; the County would officially open Hwy. 79 South on April 12; and the Temecula Chamber's State-of-the-City Address was a success and there were extra copies available of the 12-minute video presentation. Riverside County EDA - No report available. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - David Rosenthal reported the golf tournament was scheduled for May 4 at Temecula Creek Inn and would include 27 holes; and the groundbreaking ceremony for the Chamber's new building was on April 26. Murrieta Valley Chamber of Commerce - Rex Oliver reported his first day was on Monday. His immediate focus would be to provide direction for ongoing Chamber activities. The April mixer would be held at The Mill Restaurant. · SWRC Manufacturers' Council - David Rosenthal reported the next Council luncheon would be on May 18 - 11:30 a.m. at Hungry Hunter Restaurant in Temecula, and would discuss state-of-the region updates, a County project on industry clustering, and energy crisis issues; the Council's website was redesigned; he asked the committee to advise of any new manufacturers that move to the area; and the SWRC Career & Manufacturers' Expo was scheduled for April 12 with exhibitors from Guidant Corp., Chemicon, Scotts Manufacturing, Professional Hospital Supply, the Cities of Murrieta and Temecula, Laser Power Corp. and many others totaling 30 employers. · SWRC Economic Alliance - No report available. Adiournment The meeting adjourned at 10:10 a.m. Ci~J of Murr~ta 26442 Beckman Ct Murrieta, CA 92562 (909) 3042489 Fax: (909) 698-9885 C~ of Temecula 43200 Business Park Dr. Ternecula, CA 92590 TO: Marlene Best Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City of Lake Elsinore City of Temecula FROM: Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator DATE: April 30, 2001 SUBJ£CT: SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY 2000-2001 MARKETING REPORT Please consider this an update for all marketing activities for the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance during fiscal year 00-01. BudRet Rollover from 99-00 year 00-01 Marketinq bud,qe_t Total 00-01 Marketing budget 00-01 Marketing expenses Estimated rollover for 01-02 Leads: $ 21,918.36 $135,000.00 $156~918.36 $147,965.70 $ 8,952.66 Lori Moss Assistant City Manager City of Murrieta As a result of Alliance marketing and partnerships, the Alliance generated a total of 3,574 leads during 2000-2001. Of these leads, 3,296 were a result of industry specific trade shows, 236 were a result of local advertising, and 42 leads were generated from various economic development sources. Of these leads, we have had one relocation from San Marcos, CA. to the city of Murrieta and four business visitations/site tours. Advertisinq During the 00-01 year, the Alliance has placed ads in the following industry specific publications: Business Xpansion Medical Devise & Diagnostic Imaging Expansion Management Business Development Outlook Magazine The Business Press Forbes The :30 second television commercial that was produced for the Alliance in the 99-00 year, aired during September - October in San Diego on Channel 7 during "Good Morning America" as well as the local morning and evening news. The commercial ran for 6 weeks with a total of 192 spots. This commercial also aired during the presidential debates and Monday night football. The Alliance placed radio ads in San Diego to coincide with the television commercial. These commercials aired on KOGO AM, a talk radio station featuring Rush Limbaugh and Dr. Laura, KSDO, a local San Diego station featuring money talks and local news, and XTRA AM, based out of Mexico, this sports station broadcasts from Mexico to Los Angeles. Our commercial aired during the 2000 World Series. Trade Shows I have attended or committed to the following trade shows on behalf of the Alliance: · Wescon September 19-21 · NACORE September 24-28 · Bio 2000 October 30-31 · COMDEX November 13 - 17 · MD&M January 8-10 · Business Expo. January 26 · Nepcon West February, 27-28 · Comdex Canada March 12-14 · Westec2001 March 26-29 · Career Fair/Expo. April 21 · Bio 2001 June 25-27 Electronics, Communications Real Estate Symposium Biotech industry Communications Medical Device Manufacturing Business Electronic Manufacturing Communications Manufacturing Exposition Manufacturing Career Fair Biotech, Biomedical Manufacturing IEEP As a result of our partnership with IEEP, the Alliance was able to attend, as a partner, six of the above mentioned trade shows. A total of 34 leads were responded to on behalf of the Alliance. Labor Force Survey/RFP In February the Alliance applied for a grant through WRCOG and SANDAG to assist with a Labor Force/Commuter survey. Draft copies of the Alliance Labor Force Study RFP, as well as copies of the 1997 commuter studies from Murrieta and Temecula have been sent to WRCOG and SANDAG. We are expecting to hear the result of our application in June. Consultant The Alliance has retained a consultant for the purpose of attracting both business and venture capital to Southwest Riverside County. In consultation with Southwest Riverside County, the consultant will assist with the preparation of a Strategic Plan, as well as identify venture capital, identify potential start-up companies, assist the Alliance with the formation of a venture capital consortium,_provide content analysis of Alliance marketing materials as is relates to targeted businesses and venture capitalists and assist with contacting CEO's of companies in the high-tech, biomedical and telecommunication industries. CD-ROM Along with Cutting Edge marketing, the Alliance has started development of a CD-ROM This CD will be approximately twelve minutes in length and contain demographic information, testimonials from local businesses and cost comparisons for industrial/commercial land and buildings. It will also contain important information from the Southwest Riverside County Business Resource Guide. The expected completion date for this project is June 20, 2001. Web-site The web-site for the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance is located at www.swrco.com. The Alliance is currently preparing to update this site. Items to be added include; demographic information and available industrial/commercial prices and information. Broker Breakfast On February 14, the Alliance hosted its first Broker Breakfast. Brokers, developers and real estate professionals from Southwest Riverside County were invited to this breakfast, where updates from all Partners were provided. Feedback from the breakfast was very positive, resulting in a quarterly breakfast schedule. The next breakfast will be in June. Local Outreach On behalf of the Alliance, I am writing an article for the Valley Business Journal, a monthly publication in Southwest Riverside County. Topics include, the history and goals of the Alliance, touting local businesses in SWRC, the Brine line, comparison on local markets outside Riverside County, industry clusters in the region and the Workforce Development Center in Temecula. On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings: SWRC Manufacturer's Council Business Relations Committee (including site visits to local businesses) EDC IEEP Partner meetings Tourism/Chamber Economic Development meetings concerning the Southwest Riverside County region. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at (909) 600-6066. Sincerely, Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator Copy: Brad Hudson Robin Zimpfer Sarah Mundy Robert Moran Teresa Gallavan INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP For Period: January 2001 to April 2001 I April r Cumulative I Comments 1. Corporate · Public Speaking Engagements 4 17 · Community Outreach 18 98 · Membership Events 5 16 · Public Policy Events 0 0 · Committee Meetings 5 12 · Member Visits & Calls / e-mail 16 / 2 77 / 4 · Potential Member Meetings 10 44 · Potential Member Letters & Calls 126 348 · New Members 5 12 · Corporate Marketin(.i - · Mailings 0 2 · Press Releases 0 0 · Tradeshows 0 2 · Print Advertising Placements 2 9 · Other 0 4 2. Foundation · Grants 0 0 · Activities 0 0 3. Regional Marketing · Direct Mail 0 2 (10,000) · Print Advertisin~l Placements 2 8 · TradeshowsJTrade Associations 1 / 1 6 / 1 SIOR, Econ Bdefing · Press Releases 3 7 ' IE-TechNews (2x), Business Press (CallPoint) · Professional Articles 1 3 The Business Press · Media Relations 0 1 · Television I 5 KVCR (:15 ad 2x) · Other 0 0 4. Economic Development · Prospect Missions 0 3 · Site Selector Outreach I 4 Encore Pharmaceuticals · Foreign AttrectJon Activities 0 0 · Total Leads - 8 - - 29 - Lead Sources: · Magazines 2 6 · Tradeshows 0 5 · Brokers/Site Selectors 1 5 · Web 0 3 · CATAC 3 5 · Phone 1 3 · IEEP I 2 · Total Inquiries - 40 - - 1,044 - o Inquides/Tradeshows 17 / 1 664 / 5 Page 1 of 3 Last Revision May 8, 2001 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PAR1NERSHIP For Period: January 2001 to April 2001 April ] Cumulative 4. Economic Development (cont'd) o Inquiries Print Ads o Inquiries - misc. · Prospects / Tradeshows · Site Tours · Attractions o Jobs Created · Retentions o Jobs Retained · Financial Investment · Relocation/Expansion Assists · Bio Tech/High Tech 5 333 18 47 11 11 3 6 0 1 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comments WESTEC Show o Marketing Inquiries Leads 0 0 0 Other 5 11 : TechNews (1500) 5. Education/Workforce Development · School Enrichment Stnd Awards "Callpoint" 800 line: o Employees Requested o Training Requests o Business Referral Requests · Marketing 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 1 · Other 6. SBDC · Jobs Created/Jobs Retained 16 / 5 70 / 39 RCC Database throughout Riverside County ( ) · Total Economic Impact - SBDC and Export actions combined · Client Activity · Client Hours · Training Events · Training Hours · Training Attendees $6,486,709 182 857.85 23~ $8,690,215 969 72 907 2,887.5 354 1,859 · Inland Empire Trade: o Export Actions $3,263,0010 o Financial Impact · ' OutreachPUblicSpeaking EngagementsActivity 1~03 5 $4,431,212 43 Quarterly report 110 Quarterly report 7. Film Commission Industry Outreach RequestsforLocafions Permits: San Bemardino/Riverside 4 163 16/5 7 791 61/20 Page 2 of 3 Last Revision May 8, 2001 iNLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP For Period: January 2001 to April 2001 I April I Cumulative ] Comments 7. Film Commission (cont'd) · Permits: BLM/US Forest Svc 21 51 · Production Days 154 627 · Filming Credits 0 0 · Economic Impact $3,439,500 $17,831,000 · Total Filming Activity - 72 - - 244 - o Features 3 11 o Television 1 9 o Commercials 16 70 o Stills 37 107 o Music Videos 1 3 o Student Films 8 19 o Documenta~j/Industry 6 25 Videos 8. Tourism Council · Industry Outreach 0 0 · Marketing Activity · Tredeshows 1 4 LA Times · Non-Mailed Promotional Materials 1,100 tradeshow, boxes to o Visitor Guides 0 2,260 riverside sheriffs dept, o Rack Brochure 0 200 Ternecula chamber of com. · Mailings Onta~o Airport, Onta~o · Visitor Guides 1,498 2,727* Convention Center, LA- - I E Rack Brochures 1 228 Welcome Center, Hilton SB, ESRI · Ads 0 0 · Member Visits 0 0 · Leads 0 1,155' · New Member Prospects 1 1 Theo · New Members 0 0 · Toudsm Events 0 0 * Reflects changes made to past reports. Page 3 of 3 Last Revision May 8, 2001 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING April 5, 2001 UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX #206 -MINUTES- Board Members Present: A. Atkinson, S. Caballero, D. Cromie, L. Daniels, A. Dickson, B. Doffman, M. Ferre, D. Hards, J. Husing, N. King, K. Lee, W. Mattioli, A. Morris, T. Ooms, M. Ostoich, B. Oulman, G Reyes, A~ Sabsevitz, J. Sceranka, D. Slawson, P. Thomison, C. Yoshizaki, R. Zimpfer. IEEP Staff Members Present: M. Maloney, S. Miggins, M. Oswald, D. Skeens, G. Vielmann, R. Whittaker. Overview of Meetin,q: Chairman Arnold Dickson called the meeting to order at 7:35 a.m. Self-introductions were made. Minutes for February 8, 2001 were accepted. Motion Reyes. Seconded by Dorfman. 1. FINANCIAL REPORT: Mark Ostoich presented the report from the Finance Committee. He made mention ofthe following: · Good revenues, due to the early account receivables. · Projections look strong; we should expect a high/Iow/high cycle for the year. Rhonda Whittaker explained city payments; whose time for payments are usually in March and July. Financial review accepted. Motion made by Moore. Seconded by Gourley. 2. ACTION ITEMS: The following items were addressed by Arnold Dickson: · TRASPORTATION: Seeking approval on position papers for State and Federal Legislative Program for the Riverside County Transportation Commission and San Bemardino Associated Governments. i. Norm King made the observation of officials in support of this Legislation. Transportation position papers approved. Motion made by Husing. Seconded by Goudey. SB 910: Seeking retroactive approval for a letter that was sent out as an opposition letter to SB 910. i. John Husing made comments on the economical impact to lower the funds for affordable housing in the Inland Empire to in turn build more on the coast. ii. Brian Oulman made mention of the city's concerns of this legislation which would affect greatly in city funding. iii. John Husing then spoke of the gas tax as what we are withholding. SB 910 opposition letter approved. Motion made by Gourley. Seconded by Ostoich. · State Fair Booth: Seeking approval for the State Fair Booth for the Inland Empire builder's contract. i. Cost of the booth will be of $19,000.000. This will include the building and maintaining of the 16 ~' booth. ii. Ted Ooms made mention of the contract made with the counties of Riverside and San Bernardino for the State Fair Booth. iii. Mark Ostoich, asked if the counties reimburse IEEP. iv. Teri Ooms went on to explain how funds are raised through the IEEP Tourism Members who sponsor the booth, along with the counties who will each pay $7, 500. State Fair Booth approved. Motion made by Ostoich. Seconded by Zimpfer. · SBDC Letters: Seeking approval to write letters for additional support to Senators Boxer & Feinstein and local congressional representatives. Approval write letter of thanks to Senator Bond. i. The request by Senator Bond is to the Senate Budget Committee not to lower the funding to SBDC's nation wide. Letter writing approved. Motion made by Zimpfer. Seconded by Husing. CPUC: Seeking approval to write a letter to Loretta Lynch in regards to the increase in electric rates by 30%. i. Discussion revolved around the issue that residential rates are staying lower than those being given to the commercial/business/industry sector. ii. The letter needs to insure that the commercial/business/industry sector is not the only one burdened. iii. Norman King asked is an analysis had been made that showed what percentage the commercial/business/industry sector was being burdened with. iv. Arnold Dickson responded with a 65%. His main concem is that the commercial/business/industry sector tends not to be as vocal about issues such as these. v. Norman King, further commented on the burden the consumers will feel, due to the increase in item per item increase. vi. Jim Gourley, wants to make sure we make a mention of the employer/employee relation. You undo the employer; there will in turn be no employees. vii. John Husing, wants to make sure we do not express an opposition to the increase, because it is needed. viii. Keith Lee, made an open invitation to all members of the board for April 7 From 8:30 - 12 p.m. at the San Bernardino Hilton, where the commissioner will be headng testimony from the local commercial/business/industry sector. ix. Ann Atkinson, made mention of the thirteen (13) permits being processed for energy plant producers in CA and two (2) in Mexico; hoping this will lower rates with time. Letter writing approved. Motion made by Cromie. Seconded by Ostoich. · AB 1001: Seeking approval to promote development of the Space Port in San Bernardino. i. Ann Atkinson, asked what was the projected location. ii. Ted Ooms, Northern San Bemardino County, along with thirteen (13) other states. Promotion approved. Motion made by Atkinson. Seconded by Lee. · SB 857: Request for Ted Ooms to testify on April 24, 2001 in regards to this Technology Bill legislation. i. Senator Soto introduced legislation, where the RTA program would operate in the Inland Empire. ii. Ted's testimony would be along the lines of why the region needs these services and IEEP should be the contract contact. Approved for testifying. Motion made by Husing. Seconded by Goudey. · AB 227: Seeking approval to support the following legislation. i. The legislation will extend the timeline for the Gas taxes to go into Transportation. Approved for support. Motion made by Oulman. Seconded by Sceranka. ii. Attraction i. STAFF REPORT: Teri Ooms reported using the monthly report information and made mention of the following items. Increase in Marketing and Development. Strong numbers in the region. Prospect missions to England, Canada, and Japan. One (1) successful attraction to date, despite of the energy crisis. Name cannot be given out at this time. ii. There are five (5) other companies that are in a holding pattems. iii. There have been twenty-one (21) new sit searches. · Forbes: The 11-page supplement is due for release on May 28, 2001. · Retention: Not a concern yet, which is a good sign for the region. i. 800 inquiries ii. Since the beginning of the year IEEP has had seven (7) new members and has lost two (2) lost members. · Film: The film commission has been extremely active. They won three (3) marketing awards. i. Pathways to production funds have come in for students. · Tourism: In developmental processes. 3 i. An e-newsletter is under construction that will go out to all IETC members. ii. Web site is under construction. iii. John Husing, asked who was staffing this position. iv. Teri Ooms, responded "no one person, right now it's the group working to get this done". · Government Affairs: SCAG meeting on April 10, 2001, attempting to set-up a local advisory group to insure the voice of the Inland Empire. · Technology: i. There have been four e-newsletter have gone out. ii. A GIS lab will be set-up. iii. Preparation for high tech in June and in the Fall. iv. Web site under construction. v. We have been awarded a fellow, who will for 12 weeks in the summer. vi. Clermont grad students are developing a database that could possibly be used for marketing purposes. · Grants: i. Six grants to fund existing programs have come in. · Announcements: i. Membership Luncheon in June ii. SBA awards on May 19, 2001 in Ontario. iii.April 19, 2001 will be the grand opening celebrations for the SBDC west end office. iv. Workforce RFP is in process with seven (7) schools, which will split the funds. Funding will end on June 30, 2001. v. Golf Tournament: Reminder to send in your registration forms. COMMITTEE REPORTS · Government Affairs: nothing! · Economic Development: Russ Moore, mentioned an article in the Wall Street Journal in regards to Silicon Valley. There have been three (3) trade shows from the eight (8) IEEP is scheduled to have throughout the year. Three (3) site tours have been conducted for Fortune 500 companies. · Community Partners: Brian Oulman, recapped activities and highlighted Linda Daniels on the high technology infrastructure committee. Linda Daniels, spoke of the developed strategies for companies to take part in. She will be meeting with City Managers this month to convince them of the strategic goals. In looking at a tag system, one of the strategies is to add conduits bundles for the city at the same time that a new company is getting conduits put in. This would allow for the City's to build their infrastructure without the high cost of doing so. · Education & Workforce: Nothing! · SBDC: Ann Atkinson, congratulated on the great job being done. Mike Stull, mentioned of the two part-time locations that have been opened in Barstow and Corona. He recognized Robin Zimpfer for her years of service to the SBDC board. NEW BUSINESS: NONE 4 6. QUESTIONS TIME: · Norman King asked if companies are choosing Riverside over Los Angeles due to the energy crisis? To which Ted Ooms responded No companies are looking for a certain time of location not a city. · Ann Atkinson, asked what happened in Osaka. Sarah Miggins made mention of the positive exposure with governments and companies alike. Reminded everyone that Marketing is crudal for the region. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS: · Member Luncheon on Transportation of April 25, 2001 · Golf Toumament May 7, 2001. · Board Meeting on June 7, 2001. Meeting was adjourned at 8:25 a.m. APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OFFINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 22, 2001 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of Apdl, 2001. MOACTRPT MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: (~'/~ Bred Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: May 2, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - April, 2001 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of April, 2001: SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired 14 16 10 6 2,905 52 191 442 13 270 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns II1. ASPHALT REPAIRS a. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. 230 New and repainted legends B. 51,711 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 27 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 39 service order requests for the month of April ~ 2001. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 62 events and response to street emergencies. hours of overtime which includes standby time, special The total cost for Street Maintenance per[orr'ned by Contractors for the month of April~ 2001 was $ 98~477.00 compared to $ 33~227.00 for the month of March, 2001. Account No. 5402 $ 61,462.00 Account No. 5401 $ 34,915.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ 2,100.00 Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (ClP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital improvements) JerryAlegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of April, 2001 DATE ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST SIZE CONTRACTOR: GUENO DEVELOPMENT Date: 04/09/01 # 5402 NICHOLAS REMOVE AND REPLACE A.C., OVERLAY A.C. AND RESTRIPE 89,354 TOTAL S.F. TOTAL COST $ 56,980.00 CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING Date: 04/02/01 # 5401 Date: 04/04/901 # 5402 NADA LANE YNEZ AT VALLEIO REGRADE SHOULDER, CONSTRUCT A.C. DOWNSPOUTS AND INSTALL 820 L.F. OF 6 A.C. BERM TOTAL COST I $ 14,615.00 RESTORE CORNERS TO ORIGINAL ELEVA- TIONS AND REMOVE EXCESS MATERIALS TOTAL COST ] $ 2,790.00 ; CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT Date: 04/02/01 # 5401 OVERLAND CHANNEL WEED SPRAYING, WEED ABATEMENT, TRASH/DEBRIS CLEAN-UP TOTAL COST $ 5350.00 CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Date: 04/2001 # 5401 MUIRFIELD CHANNEL VIA LOBO CHANNEL VALLE JO CHANNEL DEL REY CHANNEL Date: 04/02/01 DIAZ ROAD # 5402 Date: 04/16/01 SERVICE LEVEL "R" 04/29/01 #999-5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT g5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT g5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT#99-5~2 REMOVE SILT AND DEBRIS FROM CHANNELS TOTAL COST $ 14,950.00 GRADING OF SHOULDER TOTAL COST [ $ 1,692.00 GRADING OF ALL DIRT ROADS WITHIN SERVICE LEVEL "R" AREAS TOTAL COST I $ 2,100.00 $ 34,915.00 $ 61,462.00 $ 2,100.00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF APRIL , 2001 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 04/02/01 31377 BANDAN COURT CRACK llq STREET 04/02/01 04/03/01 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT MARGARITA ROAD S.N.S. MISSING 04/03/01 04/04/01 28495 FRONT STREET WATER LEAK 04/04/01 04/04/01 29870 MIRA LONA DRIVE ROOT PRUNE 04/04/01 04/06/01 40254 BENWOOD COURT TRASH TRUCK 04/06/01 04/06/01 41540 AVENIDA BARCA POTHOLES 04/09/01 04/07/01 SANTIAGO Al,ID ORMSBY DIRT ROADS 04/09/01 04/09/01 40050 CANNES COURT SIDEWALK REPAIR 04/10/01 04/11/01 30820 LINKS COURT TREES 04/12/01 04/11/01 30042 CALLE HALCON GRATE ON PROPERTY 04/11/01 04/12/01 39310 GREENWOOD LANE ROAD GRADING 04/12/01 04/13/01 RANCHO CALIF. RD. AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE DEBRIS PICK-UP 04/13/01 04/13/01 I-IWY 79 SO. AT MARGARITA DEBRIS PICK-UP 04/13/01 04/13/01 44881 TROTSDALE ROAD CHANNEL CLEAN-UP 04/13/01 04/16/01 31149 CORTE ALHAMBRA POTHOLES 04/16/01 04/16/01 45747 JERONIMO STREET CRACKED SIDEWALK 04/16/01 04/17/01 29729 CALLE OLVERA DRAINAGE CONCERN 04/17/01 04/17/01 32354 CORTE CRUCES TREE TRIMING 04/17/01 04/18/01 30984 LOLITA ROAD ROAD GRADING 04/18/01 04/18/01 31470 PASEO GOLETA SPRINKLER REPAIR 04/23/01 04/19/01 TRADEWATER COURT AT HUMBER DRIVE POTHOLE 04/20/01 04/20/01 41846 FIFTH STREET SPRINKLERS 04/23/01 04/23/01 40612 NOB COURT STREET NAME SIGN 04/23/01 04/24/01 45711 KIMO STREET SIDEWALK 04/25/01 04/25/01 MOTOR CAR PARKWAY POTHOLE 04/26/01 04/26/01 AVENIDA VERDE AT DEL REY ROAD STOP SIGN 04/26/01 04~26/01 31919 CALLE BALLANTINE TREE REMOVAL 04/27/01 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 27 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF APRIL, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 04/02/01 NICOLAS AT WARBLER & JON CHRISTLt~N REPAIR 2 S.N.S. 04/03/01 PALA ROAD AT WOLF VALLEY REPLACED R-I-A 04/04/01 YUKON AT RED RIVER REPLACED R-26 04/06/01 WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON AND RED LIGHT SIGNS 8 L~dqCHOCALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ INSTALL R-73-6 1 04/09/01 WINCHESTER AT YNEZ REPALCE TYPE N YELLOW 1 04/10/01 MUIRFIELD AT CLUBHOUSE INSTALL R-I 1 04/12/01 FRONT AT MORENO REPLACE W-41 1 04/17/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT COSMIC REPLACE R-7 04/17/01 JEIq~ERSON NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REPLACE W-41 04/19/01 YNEZ AT PROMENADE MALL REPLACE 2 W-41 04/19/01 FRONT AT 79 SO. REPLACE 2 DELINEATORS R-I 1 04/20/01 CITY YARD INSTALL SEAT BELT SIGN 1 POST & ANCHOR FOR 04/23/01 MAIN AND PUJOL REPLACE BUS STOP SIGN 1 04/23/01 AMARITA WAY NORTH OF M¢CABE REPLACE R2-40 1 04/25/01 RANCHO CALIF. ROAD - DIAZ TO BUTTERFIELD REPAIR SIGNS 8 04/25/01 27111 DIAZ - VIA MONTEZUMA AT DEL RIO INSTALL CIP SIGNS 2 04/27~) 1 AVENIDA VERDE AND DEL REY INSTALL R-1 1 04/27/01 26845 YNEZ INSTALL TYPE K 1 04/27/01 WOLF VALLEY NORTH OF PALA REPLACE R2-55 1 04/27/01 FRONT AT 79 SO. REPLACE TYPE Q 1 TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 14 TOTAL SIGNS INSTAI.I .I~D 16 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 10 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTlt OF APRIL, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 04/03/01 AREAS #l AND #2 REPAINTED 9,107 L.F. OF RED CURB 04/06/01 MARGARITA AT AVENIDA SON'OMA PAINT 108 L.F. DOUBLE YELLOW 04/06/01 MARGARITA AT AVENIDA SONOMA PAINT 3 HASH MARKS 04/09/01 AREA #1 REPAINT 5,878 L.F. OF RED CURB 04/10/01 kREA #1 REPAINT 11,782 L.F. OF RED CURB 04/10/01 MUIRFIELD AT CLUBHOUSE INSTALL 2 LEGENDS 04/11/01 AREA #1 REPAINT 11,140 L. F. OF RED CURB 04/12/01 AREA gl REPAINT 7,320 L.F. OF RED CURB 04/I 6/01 AREA #2 REPAINT 4,559 L.F. OF RED CURB 04/18/01 AREA #3 REPAINTED 30 LEGENDS 04/19/01 AREA #2 REPAnqTED 24 LEGENDS 1 STOP LEGEND 04/20/01 CITY YARD INSTALL 1 CROSSWALK I 04/23/01 AREA #2 REPAINT 52 LEGENDS 04/24/01 AREA #2 REPAINT 42 LEGENDS 04/24/01 AREA #2 REPAINT 315 L.F. OF WHITE CURB 04/25/01 AREA #3 REPAINT 23 LEGENDS 04/26/01 AREAS 83 & g4 REPAINT 32 LEGENDS 04/27/01 AREA gl REPAINT 8 LEGENDS 04/30/01 AREA gl REPAINT 12 LEGENDS 04/30/01 AREA #1 REPAINT 1,502 L.F. RED CURB TOTAL NEW & REPA1NTED LEGENDS 230 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING LF. 51.711 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF APRIL, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 04/02/01 31681 DE LAS OLAS REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/02/01 DIAZ AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 22 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/03/01 41375 McCABE COURT REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/03/01 HWY 79 SO. AT PALA ROAD REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/04/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT DIAZ REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/05/01 27711 DIAZ ROAD 2 LOCATIONS REMOVED 42 SY. OF GRAFFITI 04/09/01 40168 WARBLER REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/10/01 29210 STONEWOOD REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/19/01 YNEZ AT MALL REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/26/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD WEST OF CALLE TAJO REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/27/01 YNF_Z AT TOWN CENTER NORTH & SOUTH REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 04/30/01 28790 PUJOL REMOVED 96 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 270 TOTAL LOCATIONS 13 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF APRIL, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 04/24/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD - DIAZ TO BUTTERFIELD STAGE ABATED 132 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 04/30/01 FRONT STREET AT SANTIAGO ABATED 310 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED 442 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DFVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF APRIL~ 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 04/11/01 41 $61 AVENIDA DE LA REINA TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 04/19/01 WINCHESTER AT ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 04/23/01 PAUBA AT ELINDA TRIMMED I R.O.W. TREES 04/23/01 PAUBA AT LA PRIMAVERA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL ILO.W. TREES TRIMMED 6 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF APRIL 2001 DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL TONS 04/01/01 DE PORTOLA ROAD REPAIR A.C. BERM 84 2.5 04/03/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MEADOWS REMOVE AND REPLACE 144 6 04/04/01 DE PORTOLA ROAD REPAIR A.C. BERM 31 2 04/09/0! CITYWlDE FILL POTHOLES 52 TEMP AC 04/09/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT LYNDIE LANE FILL POTHOLES 4 TEMP AC 04/09/01 YNEZ 350' SOUTH OF WINCHESTER FILL POTHOLES 10 TEMP AC 04/09/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MEADOWS R & R AC 144 4.5 04/10/01 30110 DE PORTOLA R&R AC BERM 40 2.5 04/10/01 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT CALLE DE VELARDO R & R AC BERM 10 ~, 04/10/01 DIAZ - WINCHESTER TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD FILL POTHOLES 32 TEMP AC 04/11/01 ~ RANCHO CALIF. ROAD WEST OF CHARDONNAY HILLS FILL POTHOLES 8 TEMP AC 04/11/01 28134 JEiq~'ERSON R&R AC 125 5 04/11/01 28134 JEFFERSON AC OVERLAY 18 ~ 04/12/01 AVENIDA BARCA AT MARGARITA ROAD AC OVERLAY 420 5 04117101 RANCHO CALIF, RD. BTWN. LYNDIE LAND & COSMIC AC OVERLAY 300 2.5 04/19/01 DE PORTOLA ROAD R&R A.C. BERM 141 4.5 04/23/01 DE PORTOLA ROAD R & R AC 148 3 04/24/01 PALA ROAD AT LOMALINDA POTHOLES 12 TEMP AC 04/24/01 RANCHO CALIF. ROAD - C,n!,l.l~, TAJO TO TREE DRIVE AC OVERLAY 345 2 04/25/01 RANCHO CALIF. ROAD - YNEZ TO BUTTERFIELD STAGE POTHOLES 92 TEMP AC i 04/25/01 RANCHO CALIF. ROAD - YNEZ TO BUTTERFlELD STAGE AC OVERLAY 434 2 04/26/01 YIqEZ AT VALLEJO AC BERM 147 4 04/26/01 MARGARITA AT MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL POTHOLE 4 TEMP AC 04/30/01 JEIq~ERSON AT DEL RIO R & R A.C. 160 6.5 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 2,905 TOTAL TONS 52 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF APRIL, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 04/02/01 AREA g4 CLEANED & CHECKED 44 CATCH BASINS 04,'~3/01 AREA//4 CLEANED & CHECKED 14 CATCH BASINS 04/05/01 DE PORTOLA AT JEDEDIAH SMITH CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 04/05/01 AREA//4 CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS 04/09/01 AREA g4 CLEANED & CHECKED 36 CATCH BASINS 04/11/01 AREAS #2, #3, g4 CLEANED & CHECKED 43 CATCH BASINS 04/12/~1 AREA #1 CLEANED & CHECKED 26 CATCH BASINS 04/16/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD CLEANED & CHECKED 4 CATCH BASINS 04/17/01 WINCHESTER ROAD CLEANED & CHECKED 3 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 191 APPROVAL CiTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCF/~ CITY MANAGER ~.~,//J/ ' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Jim Dorrienoe, Chief of Police May 22, 2001 Monthry Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during April of 2001. Part One crime statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department responded to twenty-nine "priority one" calls for service during the month of April, with an average response time of approximately 6.7 minutes. A total of 3,038 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. Du ring the month of April, the Temecula Police Department's Town Center storefront served a total of 179 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed fifty-nine prints taken, twenty- seven people filed police reports, thirteen people had citations signed off and two oversize vehicle permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month. He conducted child fingerprinting for a "Mommy and Me" program for pre-school children in Vintage Hills. Officer Fanene conducted four neighborhood watch meetings and conducted fifteen residential security visits and thirty-one business visits during the month. He conducted forty-seven visits to businesses for crime follow-up information. Officer Fanene also worked with our traffic division to assist with the annual "Cross Walk" event. Officer Fanene also completed his article for the Valley Business Journal titled "Weapon Safety for Shopkeepers." The POP Team continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project although no new complexes were certified. At this time there is 70% compliance with this program across the City. The team continued their 290 PC (Sex Registrant) Program in cooperation with the Murrieta Police Department, which resulted in three felony warrants being served. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 The team continued their "Crime Free Parks" program and as a result they made contact with eight subjects and issued three citations for drinking in public. The T.A.G. program for the month was held in conjunction with the Crime Free Parks program. The team also worked the continuing "Homeless Assistance" program, which resulted in contacting eight subjects who were offered and refused assistance. One homeless subject was arrested during the month for a misdemeanor offense. Two off-road vehicle enforcement programs were held during the month and resulted in the issuance of two citations and four warnings. The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP team and a location to assist the public with police services. This has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served ninety customers, eleven fingerprints were taken, twenty-one reports were written and three citations were signed off. The traffic team reported that during the month of April there were 571 citations issued for hazardous violations, sixty-six citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 104 parking citations were issued. Of the 571 hazardous citations issued, 126 were issued for red light violations as part of the newly begun SLAP (Stop Light Abuse Program). There were eleven injury and thirty- eight non-injury traffic collisions reported and thirty-seven drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERACIT program this month led to the arrest of two subjects for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in 69 citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. During the month of April, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 184 calls for service. These calls resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on twelve misdemeanors and two felony cases for various offenses. Four citations were also issued. Officers Robles and Rupe provided training to security staff on officer safety and cooperative policing. The mall officers also presented the mall management staff with the inkless check system program. The team also worked with RAID (Riverside Auto theft Interdiction Detail) to assist in the investigation and reduction in the number of vehicle thefts and burglaries at the mall. The school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. During the past month, the officers conducted numerous presentations in areas such as gateway drugs, forensics, and other topics. They also conducted counseling sessions with students. A total of two arrests were made on TVUSD campuses during the month. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth coud program. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools with truancy meetings and follow up with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. Officer Adams facilitated the sixty- fourth youth court session and conducted the sixty-fifth orientation meeting during the month. Officer Adams continued to work with "At Risk" juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. During the month of April, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and John Morin handled a total of twenty-five cases. These cases resulted in thirty-two misdemeanor and eighteen felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. They also issued twenty-five citations for various violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the cityon a pro-active basis. The team also recovered four grams of marijuana, three grams of methamphetamine and fourteen grams of cocaine. Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 555 hours of service in April. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 354 hours during the month (220 hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temeoula). The posse contributed 190 hours during the month. APPROVAL CITY A'I-DORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~_~ CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Howard Windsor, City Fire Chief May 22, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of Apdl, 2001. Response Statistics for April, 2001 Structure Fire 6 3 Vehicle Fire 5 Fire - Other Medical Aid Traffic Collisions Fire Menace Standby 8 4 2 20 109 2 1 0 6 30 2 1 2 10 40 4 1 2 3 10 52 67 64 45 91 267 1052 18 32 4 17 71 269 4 133 3 1 4 12 46 Public Service 5 4 8 7 24 88 Hazmat 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Ringing Alarm 21 33 8 9 71 409 Responses Outside of the Cit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A TOTAL 149 74 135 491 2095 Medic Squad 84 Response Statistics Medic Squad 84 Time Statistics Medical Aids 192 670 Traffic Collisions 24 147 Public Service Assists 5 18 2 5 Fire Menace Standby's Structure Fires Ringing Alarm Vegetation Fire Vehicle Fire 2 36 19 99 1 3 0 4 Refuse Fire 0 5 Hazmat 1 2 TOTAL 246 989 Average Response Time Longest Response Time Medic Squad Cancelled Prior to Patient Contact 75 Average Wait Time for AMR 3.1 min 5.31 min 11 min Medic Squad on Scene Prior to AMR - Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions 107 Performed *ALS prior to AMR's Arrival 50 *ALS - Advanced Life Support Medic Squad Comments: · On 7 occasions, the Medic Squad was on scene greater than 10 minutes before the arrival of AMR. · The longest wait for an AMR unit was 15 minutes. · Medic Squad 84 had 3 response times over 10 minutes. · MS84 was out of service for mechanical repairs a total of 23 days this month, during which time MS84R was in service. Personnel Fire Prevention 1 - Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal 3 - Fire Safety Specialist 1 - Captain/Deputy Fire Marshal 2 - Fire System Inspectors 1 - Office Technician III Fire Plan Check Statistics Fire Plan Check Building TI Fire Plan Check Building Fire Plan Check Misc. 23 91 7 52 24 125 Fire Under Ground Water Plan Check 5 36 Fire Over or Under Ground Tank Plan Check 0 4 Fire Sprinkler NCOM Plan Check 9 39 Fire Sprinkler TI Plan Check 9 30 Fire Hood Duct Plan Check 5 11 Fire Spray Booth Plan Check 0 1 Fire Special Suppression Plan Check 0 0 Fire Alarm Plan Check 7 36 30 Planning Case Plan Review 85 Fire Code Permits 0 0 TOTAL 119 510 Fire Prevention (Continued) Fire Inspection Statistics Fire Prevention Final Fire Prevention Shell Fire-Underground Hydro Fire Thrust Block Fire Over Head Hydro Fire Flow Fire Flush Fire Sprinkler Final Fire Weld Inspection Fire Hood Duct Final Fire Pre- Wire Fire Alarm Final Fire Spray Booth Final Fire Safety Inspection Fire State Mandated Inspection Fire Special Evems Inspection Fire Piping Hydro Fke Shear Valves Fire Over/Under Tank Final Fire Special Suppression System Fire Special Project Investigations Fire Administrative - Meetings etc... Fire Misc. Inspections Engine Co. Follow Up Enforcemem TOTAL 15 75 12 52 4 15 6 20 10 39 1 2 4 16 12 43 4 13 0 3 11 19 17 52 1 3 6 41 4 13 5 12 1 1 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 8 4 9 0 3 119 444